Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/13/1998 • TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 13, 1998 LOCATION: 129 Holmes Street South Mayor Jon Brekke presiding 1] Roll Call at 6:00 p.m. 2] Approval of Agenda 3] Other Business a] Hiring of Secretary for Building Inspection Division b] 4] Worksession with Jackson Town Board a] Comprehensive Development Plan b] Annexation Issues c] Other Business 5] Adjourn to Tuesday, October 20, 1998,at 7:00 p.m. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor & City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director Marilyn Remer, Payroll/Benefits Coordinator SUBJECT: Hiring of Building Inspections Secretary DATE: October 9, 1998 INTRODUCTION: Interviews have been held with candidates for the Building Inspections Secretary position. At this time, staff is recommending that the City Council authorize the hiring of Bonnie Mauritz to fill this position. BACKGROUND: A vacancy was created with the transfer of Jeanette Shaner from the position of Building Inspection Secretary to Secretary in the City Clerk' s office effective August 13, 1998 . Staff utilized the Scott County Personnel Department for the selection process which provided a certification list of eleven candidates. Staff interviewed four candidates from this list . The interview panel consisted of the Community Development Director, Building Official and Payroll/Benefits Coordinator. After reviewing the results of the interviews, applications and reference checks, the recommendation is to hire Bonnie E. Mauritz . Ms. Mauritz has eight years experience as a Construction Facilities Administrator for a firm in the western united states region, plus other outstanding previous office experience. Her anticipated starting date is October 19, 1998 and would be contingent upon successful completion of the standard pre-employment physical and background check. BUDGET IMPACT: The advertised starting salary range was $12 . 57-$13 . 92/hr. Based on this candidates extensive experience and education, staff is recommending a starting salary of $13 . 92/hr, Step 4, Grade H of the 1998 Pay Plan with subsequent increases in pay occurring on the annual anniversary date of employment . All new hires are subject to a 6-month probationary period. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the hiring of Bonnie E. Mauritz for the Building Inspection Secretary position. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to authorize the hiring of Bonnie E. Mauritz as Building Inspections Secretary at $13 . 92/hr. Step 4, Grade H of the 1998 Pay Plan, effective October 19, 1998; subject to successful pre-employment physical and background check. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor, City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator From: Dan Hughes, Chief of Police/ Date: October 12, 1998 Subject: Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant (JAIBG) Introduction: The Police Department is seeking authorization to make application to the Minnesota Department of Economic Security, Office of Youth Development, for a$5,926 grant. Background: The Minnesota Department of Economic Security has been designated to allocate $4,167,900 in federal JAIBG funds. The City of Shakopee has the opportunity to receive an allotment of$5,926 under the JAIBG program. Our allocation is based on a formula prescribed by federal law. The program is intended to help reform the juvenile justice system and to provide greater accountability for juveniles involved in the juvenile or criminal justice system. This program encourages collaboration with neighboring jurisdictions with allocations of less than $5,000 to participate in the development and implementation of their plans. Potential partners are Scott County, Savage, Prior Lake, New Prague, Jordan, Belle Plaine, and the townships of Scott County. If we choose to partner with other jurisdictions we would receive the same amount of funds but the additional funds from the other jurisdictions would allow the partners the opportunity to address multi jurisdictional issues with $34,421. Either application format provides the same level of funding to the City. Budget Impact: The JAIBG does require a minimum cash match of$658.48 from the City. These funds will be available in the 1999 Police Department Budget or in forfeiture funds. Action Requested: If Council concurs, they should, by motion, authorize the Police Department to make application to the Minnesota Department of Economic Security, Office of Youth Devel. • Sent, for a $5,926 Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant. Dan Hughes Chief of Police CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jackson Township Board Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Planning Workshop MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 INTRODUCTION: On Wednesday, September 9, 1998 Shakopee City staff met with members of the Jackson Township Board to discuss comprehensive planning issues. At that meeting it was agreed that a workshop meeting should be held between the Shakopee City Council and Jackson Township Board. BACKGROUND: Accompanying this report for the Council and Board's information are the following: • Copy of the current City of Shakopee Land Use Plan Map, • Copy of the draft City of Shakopee Land Use Plan Map revision, • Copy of the March 19, 1996 Development Guide Plan Amendments for Jackson Township. Current City of Shakopee Land Use Plan Map: The City's current land use plan was adopted in the fall of 1996. It guides about 826 acres in the townships for single-family residential use. The area shown is bounded on the north by STH 169; on the east by CSAH 79; on the south it extends about 2,700 feet south of C.R. 78; on the west it is bounded by CSAH 77. This area is included in the depicted 2010 MUSA Expansion. The Metropolitan Council's approval of the City's current plan in 1996 did not include approval of the depicted 2010 MUSA Expansion areas. Draft City of Shakopee Land Use Plan Map: The draft land use plan map, at this time, does not guide the area described above. An underlying reason that this area has not been depicted at this time is that City staff felt that more substantive discussions should occur between the City and Township before the City exercised planning authority over any areas in the Township. City staff's early thought and intention had been to recommend in the text that: 1) the northern area of the Township is a natural location for future urban expansion, 2) that the City and Township renew discussions regarding joint planning and annexation issues, and 3) that the City's plan be amended in the future based on those discussions. Jackson Township Guide Plan Amendments: The Amendments anticipate more rapid demand for developable land in the Township than does the City's plan. (See page 1 at(a)) As a result, the Township has guided the area in question for"Jackson 2005 Urban Reserve." (See Figure 1) The area is anticipated to be made available for residential use. (See page 5 at(d)) DISCUSSION: The following issues, at a minimum, need to be discussed, and direction provided for City staff and the Township's planning efforts; • Whether the township areas identified in the current City plan should be carried forward to the draft City plan? • If the township areas are to be carried forward to the draft plan, then what areas currently identified for MUSA staging should either be removed from the staging plan or moved further into the future? • If the township areas continue to be included in the City plan, what should be the staging of MUSA? The current Township plan anticipates much earlier staging than the City's plan. • What should the timeline be for City annexation of Township area? ACTION REQUESTED: Direction is requested regarding the issues identified above, and changes which may need to be made to either the draft City land use plan and/or the Township plan. / d R. Michael Leek Community Development Director TOWNSHIP OF JACKSON SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA DEVELOPMENT GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENTS MARCH 19, 1996 TOWN BOARD NORBERT TRIS CHAIRMAN ROSE MENKE CLERK GERALD MARECK SUPERVISOR MARK LUCE SUPERVISOR EARL WECKIVIAN TREASURER TOWNSHIP OF JACKSON SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA DEVELOPMENT GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENTS MARCH 19, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page (a) MUSA Encroachment 1 (b) Municipal Sewer Extensions 1 (C) Area Protection for Future Urbanization 3 (d) Development Type and Density 5 (e) 2020 Sewer Connections 5 (f) Rural Service Area 5-6 (g) Commercial Agriculture Areas 6 (h) Environmentally Sensitive Areas 7 (i) Transportation Guide Plan 7-8 (j) Projected School Population 9 (k) Official Map 9 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1- Land Use Plan 2 Figure 2 - Urbanization Staging Plan 4 Figure 3 - Transportation Plan 8 lime 4 - Base Map 10 Figure 5 - OFFICIAL MAP 11 TOWNSHIP OF JACKSON SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA DEVELOPMENT GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENTS MARCH 19, 1996 (a) MUSA Encroachment Urbanization of Shakopee's lands adjacent to Jackson Township is planned to advance to the Town Line within the next five year period and to consume a portion of the Township's northeast corner within the following decade. Volume III: Plans of the City of Shakopee Draft Comprehensive Plan dated April, 1995, places the westward limit of the year 2000 MUSA Expansion at Co. Rd. 79. Shakopee's year 2010 MUSA Expansion proposes to include all of the east half of Section 13 and east half of the northeast quarter of Section 24. Approximately 400 acres of Jackson Township are included in the proposal. Jackson Township considers that the rate of MUSA expansion into their northeast corner may likely come sooner as a result of higher than expected residential land demand. Also, it is expected that existing rural residential subdivisions will resist further densification of their specific developments and create pressure to divert further subdivisions to un-built areas. Accordingly, more land in areas contiguous to the proposed Shakopee expansions is planned for accommodation of these demands. Such land will be designated Urban Reserve as described below. (b) Municipal Sewer Extensions Because much of Jackson Township naturally drains to Shakopee, municipal sewers can feasibly be extended from Shakopee as the MUSA expands. A 50 year sewer engineering study commissioned by the City of Shakopee has evaluated sewer extensions into all of Jackson Township. Preliminary layouts of sewer sub-districts and estimates for future sewage flows have been made in order to plan for adequate downstream facilities. The 50 year study is currently being updated to conform with the Shakopee Draft Comprehensive Plan. Timing for the sewer extensions depends on staging plans for urban growth as described in the following paragraph. DEVELOPMENT GUIDE PLAN MARCH,1996 AMENDMENTS 1 I .1 \. \\ � '\\ t--1 " C.�•AV'v A.wo`•;fv'.;*jC.,ry I`YI v v \,... 1 1� r V-• O.O O.O vw.40.tg.$00 ° ��1■�// 'Ai*''� O�'�ifOi�`��',p�i� 4•;•.•'�:a�� RJJJ r ,/ •pd iO•�� ti O e��Xii si i♦' JJJ J f•:J `� �' Op�4 O�' �0'.p¢,twv.'� OSA �1' Oi• ..4e.• 4''•• .'s+ ':�A�•rs0• O.'O. JJJJJ - J JOi..OJ!J.%4:*:i>'4••d :4;: 40 f�• -JJ JJ .-JJ M A •'II •.g,.3�'.8 •g. a..:.•.44,4 J JJJ 404 4.4 pp��� :433.44:$44 a. j JJJ) , — c •1/44., J ��4�� �. JJJ � _I-1-1J1 JJ t �{i , _..-J JJJ-JJJJ 0 /7 A - • - JJJJ V el ''1� � y'�I/1I I J �'f JJJJJJ1 i Ill&u.1 -4111 -71 i .\ • - viJ4 11JJ i. o %illi . \‘.\ hi. I . / 7 j �\�■\ 1111 �- M • �. ■CV i .\� ilit ' 'maw. \ N tciiiih1c , 1, C Ilh JJ \1Vaintiars ■.„.■Ili rk e. p Oil ir biAiliihnimingwitliiiN ,i- 4-- N 14.°te ___ t ,. ; 7 ' .,,,v r--------,- a � ,, , 80O O z coO L■ O z (g • A m i§ > 01 5 rz Z 1 a 2 I 1 igi i Li § g JN d s2 a'O I , c t"Cl • a NC n _ i; 0 unto 11 . as°I.',0 ; .a..°' � ' ■ LL olle ® �� ''r' ° Y IIa • 1 i (C) Area Protection for Future Urbanization Jackson Township supports orderly annexation by the City of Shakopee of those areas that will be provided urban services. Shakopee has developed a plan for Urban Service Area Staging that will affect the order of urban growth in Jackson Township. The staging plan is based on feasibility of extending sewers and other urban services, minimal disruption of prime agricultural land and land use for life-cycle housing opportunities. All of Jackson Township except for the southwest quarter of Section 23 is included in Shakopee's Staging Plan. Staging areas as described in the Shakopee Draft Comprehensive Plan are shown in Figure 2. Shakopee's Staging Area F is the most imminent. Staging Area F includes the east half of the designated Urban Reserve Area in Section 13 and the east half of the designated Agricultural Area in Section 24. The reader is referred to the Shakopee Draft Comprehensive Plan for further discussion of the staging issue. The concept of preserving the land for urbanization has become evident in light of the Metropolitan Council's re-classification of the agricultural lands in the township as less than prime, and in light of the realities of annexation, the Chaska interceptor construction and the STH 101 by-pass construction. As the MUSA expands, petitions for extensions of trunk sewer and water supply systems will proliferate. As a result, service areas will form in accordance with the plan for Urban Service Area Staging. Rural residential parcels that already have homes with wells and on-site sewage systems will be included in the future trunk sewer and water service areas. Benefits received from construction of trunk facilities will be distributed evenly over the service area. Existing rural residential properties will receive the same benefits for trunk facilities as the un-built properties. All properties will be liable for their share of the assessed costs for trunk benefits even though the actual facility may not be built within ready connection distance of specific properties. Normally, rural residential property owners oppose area assessments for trunk facilities, since their benefit is perceived as either nonexistent or redundant. Existing lot sizes in the rural residential areas remaining in the township are typically two to five acres. The extrapolated costs for trunk benefits may appear to create economic hardships for many of the owners. If they decide to subdivide in order to take advantage of the improvements, they may force further assessed costs for laterals, streets and storm sewers upon their neighbors. Recently a rural subdivision with 2.5 acre lot sizes was developed in Staging Area E. Paved streets were required in accordance with policies for all rural subdivisions. Extensions of urban services into a subdivision such as this could be fraught with excessive construction and reconstruction costs that will likely be repulsed by the property owners. Even with ghost platting, extra costs for un-built street connections and reconstruction of paved streets would have to be factored in to a future assessment project. Too much extra cost will impinge upon the feasibility of the improvement project. Clearly, it is in the best interests of the township to avoid creating situations where expansion of the MUSA will conflict with rural residential land use. Consequently, it behooves the township to limit any further subdivision of land within the Urban Reserve Area to none for the purpose of preservation of the land for urbanization. DEVELOPMENT GUIDE PLAN MARCH,1996 AMENDMENTS 3 I N 0.'g 111\'' "lia .a"f•: ': a 4; 0) V. !...-b O. ----1/41 , ,r p Illink 4 .• %11 1 s •-•? omaII. , M - .. 1 •: ; _� k.y • GI,nra o 1 _•'A k • ,i -. : i, W �; i►. o It. I, _ • . ;' (Nil, gi in At csi • , . ,...,._ gs\� ,i, ._,.., ... , i.::.\..,. .. 418'03 a' ' .1 • e �� _-, • ; 14 eg l © 4 ' "*: i o ' ,ilP lod Ale 4. .a '0, • ti.2 K‘‘ 4 0 .. ; '' - ' 110 Vail z ,ik ICJ lib .4 , , -11111,:.., r 0,47 0/) , t,,,,. .:, � •, , .a o Co a . sio, 1M o a Q. 0 — v) = c 0 O Z d 1 � Ov/ ♦ p T c° I i Z -1d+ O 4 N .MIN N C Vif s —4 D 51r 4 1 1 ( ) Ded velopment Type and Density The type of development that will be allowed in the designated Urban Reserve Area is limited to residential uses with the exception of the area designated for highway commercial at the Co. Rd. 15/STH 101 Bypass interchange. Densities in new developments will be restricted to those allowed in the appropriate subdivision and zoning ordinances of the annexing authority at the time urban services are extended. (e) 2020 Sewer Connections The number of households within the Urban Reserve Area that may be sewered by the year 2020 is dependent upon the rate of growth predicted in the Shakopee Draft Comprehensive Plan. The 50 year sewer engineering study commissioned by the City of Shakopee is being updated to conform with the elements of the Shakopee Draft Comprehensive Plan. Estimated residential equivalent connections per the default 50 year plan for the period from the years 2010 to 2040 are based on parameters shown in the following table. TABLE 1- ESTIMATED SEWER CONNECTIONS, 2010 - 2040 SHAKOPEE SUB- JACKSON STAGING ACRES RECs per RECS DISTRICT AREA ACRE JT A North half of F 233 2.5 583 JT B Part of E 168 2.5 419 TOTAL -- 401 2.5 1002 Many factors beyond the scope of those considered in this document may affect the actual number of connections. The numbers shown are only the best guess at this time. The reader should consult the final Shakopee Comprehensive Plan and the updated 50 year sewer plan when available for more information. (I) Rural Service Area Those areas outside of the Urban Reserve Area include highway commercial, industrial, rural residential and commercial agricultural. Some of the commercial agriculture areas in Sections 23 and 24 have already been split up into small parcels ranging in size from two to ten acres. Three rural residential subdivisions are already established. Due to the density of existing rural residential development and the presence of wetlands, much of the land in these sections is not amenable to commercial agriculture. Also, provisions have been established for relocation of certain land uses displaced by the S.T.H. 101 Bypass. The relocation of 60 displaced lots in their pertinent land uses was allowed in Jackson Township as described in Scott County Resolution No. 80037 and subsequent agreements. Accordingly, the designated areas in Sections 23 and 24 DEVELOPMENT GUIDE PLAN MARCH,1996 AMENDMENTS 5 are better suited for infilling with residential parcels consistent with the neighboring developments. Other areas designated as Highway Commercial and Industrial provide ample space for business, commercial, and industrial uses. Lot sizes will be required to have an average minimum size of 2.5 acres. Smaller lots will be allowed where sufficient provisions for on-site sewage systems including additional backup soil treatment areas can be demonstrated, but the average in any one subdivision will be limited to 2.5 acres minimum. Commercial and industrial areas located outside of the Urban Reserve Area are beyond the 2010 to 2040 sewer service area. Uses in these areas must depend on private wells and on-site sewage treatment systems. Consequently, low water use/large open area type businesses and industries will be encouraged. Setbacks and frontage requirements consistent with existing and future developments must be met. Ghost platting will be required for all rural residential developments and lot splits in order to lay out the pattern of future developments. (g) Commercial Agricultural Areas As urban services come closer, land values and consequent tax burdens increase. Parcelling of farm land for re-sale affords some owners the opportunity to alleviate these burdens. The current 40 acre minimum lot size discourages new street construction, but also limits access. Upon consideration of the frequency of individual farm ownerships it appears that the 40 acre minimum lot size could be economically punitive. Because of the impending changes in land valuation that ripple out from the edge of urban service areas, some of the larger tracts of land may be caught with a shifting real estate tax burden whereby splitting into smaller parcels may begin to make economic sense. Land in the agriculture areas is less than prime. As development pressures increase it is expected that the usefulness of these areas for commercial agriculture will be less important than the usefulness for housing. Accordingly, a 40 acre minimum lot size encumbers those property owners that may see their incomes shift away from agricultural production. A ten acre minimum lot size seems to suit the need for protection of the land for future rural development. A typical, 660 ft. square, ten acre parcel fits nicely into patterns for minimum access spacing guidelines discussed in the Transportation Guide Plan that follows. Consequently, Commercial Agricultural Areas will be allowed a density of one unit per ten acres. The one unit in ten acre density may be prone to fostering an interim hobby farm environment, but such an environment is not inconsistent with the goals espoused in the township's current development guide plan. Coupled with the minimum access spacing guidelines, the distribution of housing in the agricultural areas will be sparse. Ghost platting will be required as a condition for a 10 acre minimum lot size subdivision of land so that buildings and accesses may be planned to ultimately accommodate future urban services. DEVELOPMENT GUIDE PLAN MARCH,1996 AMENDMENTS 6 (h) Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protected waters, wetlands, floodplain, and steep slopes will be protected through the county zoning ordinance. The Township will require evaluation of the environmentally sensitive areas on a site-specific basis and may amend the base map depiction of these areas as necessary to meet actual conditions. (10 Transportation Guide Plan Trunk Highway 101 by-pass construction, realignment of U.S. Highway 169 and construction of Co. Rd 78 drastically affect Jackson Township's Year 1990 Road Classification Guide Plan. Furthermore, the City of Shakopee's Draft Comprehensive Plan overlays all of Jackson and resets the functional classification scheme. In the new scheme north-south County Roads 69, 15 and 79 are upgraded to minor arterial priority. East-west Co. Rd 78 also gains minor arterial status. North-south Co. Rd. 77 is upgraded to a collector street designation. New roads are planned as follows. 1. A new minor arterial "frontage road" is planned along the south side of the STH 101 by-pass from Co. Rd. 69_east across the township to Co. Rd. 79 where it will connect with the planned Shakopee Arterial Reliever that will continue east to Co. Rd. 83. 2. A new collector street frontage road is planned along the east side of U.S. Highway 169 from the Co. Rd. 69/STH 101 by-pass south frontage road intersection southwest to Co. Rd. 78. 3. A new collector street frontage road is planned along the west side of U.S. Highway 169 from STH 41 northeast to 115th Street (Strunks Road). The importance of 115th St. is elevated due to the fact that it will be retained as an interchange with U.S. 169 while U.S. 169 to the south will be realigned. The new U.S. 169 alignment will create the new STH 101 by-pass/Co. Rd. 69 interchange. A portion of U.S. 169 south of 115th St. will be obliterated leaving 115th St. as the first major outlet north of STH 41. Another leg of the collector street frontage road is planned along the west side of U.S. Highway 169 from 115th St. farther north to Chaparral Ave. 4. A new collector street is planned along the west side of the C &NW Railway from STH 41 northeast to Strunks Road. 5. A new local street is planned along the common boundary with Louisville Township from Co. Rd. 69 to Co. Rd. 15. Minimum access spacing guidelines recently established by the county highway engineer will apply to new development considerations. The new functional classification designations that relate to traffic volumes will restrict access for private residential, individual commercial and industrial driveways and new streets. For example, a new street serving a 10 acre minimum lot size subdivision would likely be spaced at least 1/4 mile from the nearest intersection with a low volume, undivided two-lane county road. A copy of the county's spacing guidelines follows. DEVELOPMENT GUIDE PLAN 7 MARCH,1996 AMENDMENTS 0 o • o F 2 2 2 Z 73 73 o0c 0r • R 8 aaa 8. 2. 24 73 W = C C CC V, N N O CD N 2.C Z hE 0 a E O D m CD M c N a N .fl � t E— E � o 2 o � E E E NJ p — VD 7. — a U ❑ ID a c g' 2' . c --'. o,E a 0, 5 3 e.�5 c�i t3� co c [U �� C N 2. y • y y—a N t2Cn 2 efl to J I O CD _m _O O C, CO `�) Ol C J) =11.1 la E E = c y cb o Ta CO c = - o U c a c c W m a, g2ess p V G� 0 V as 7.3 asC N z !p T La 8. 413 "2 N m N 2. 2 eo 2 �. FJ a o m m m C 2 OtG N C Z o E E E E � `� E e� ma c W o v m �-§ = � 1 E E -* = U Q •- ^ T- L _ H N ca > o y N 2 842 2'2 Pi 0,2 . . . 0 }( eUC t'3 c0 cSU7 eta U 00 ?► rv� z e0 E NG 22 pN N 2 N 2.2 2 O t9 C ON e� V �. T © .2o) 2 Q C C o, c NG Q, C N 8 U = >, 1,, o ICC 0 0,2 0 03 cs os TS so to 171 n -© C Cl) as co 0 in m '' E C. C. d OCm O CO v' C0u2. 28 c Cl)/ U r mC o o ., C = 4, 0, 0 00, c EcE `n .E Ems Eu' — m wc E V 'xi o - m a Gc c. G c cJG c •EGC nN W Q < Z O ** a .* � .* 2 — "X .2 ec ; 0 m w W F- Cl)N a N N N 7.5 cz in —et: t. EE 2.2 2 e' ! 8 u 2 N a C en .. 3 i 412 � 'e7, © s �� �NQ O _ N c Z O N 33 N -g3 E -g ? F� L momE74 _z to 'OC p, 22 o •O C y O N 03 eti a cc a - C' Q > m F.-0 io a o E 0.2 Q E. e0 � 2 N 2.2 e� . - �� � C7 ¢ 00 g� N c �u C') := L' a Q' C' c, g oeC H oec� 21 33 = c, 0 --- 2 .s. n � . a s E g c E -a a E a tttt_dddd r 's _ co $ a � �X — C > Z, m . -x = cv E cat G-x = E -a E30 _ e �a a.05� p _, m p .Q F3aoa 0 el 9 C E � e13EXI fa e E ID . g . UCI) aN o e � m O E a3 .0 U � mEEq Z > 1 > > 4 in m � esa o 'eo »p 4� iQ lc AC E s a5 E g E > > > 3 8 _� Cn _ -o 3m > � cn o cA > ` y •. •. . 8 . w Z - } o aoa b o y. a_ a.aS10 c .� U)i z ter= = rte-- `r'- ac`s ? t= t-- CO d m U O ul u 1 az N v en lig! ;M .P ':--h '0.... Pi . K. !.`.R ''' • ' ' ' . .,1k-P .t' iI - 1 rWO - I \ ,. • � /4 �la b , " M � . P -fir ., _r1,111Nr--.). art 4 QAir Ankh if - ��1,1 ,.. wr#-- �.� 1 y. ... . 0 0 WM ‘4 141 I Ir.;1 1 .:..i n. . , '01\ , .n. IF Iiq '1 � \ 1 g 6-'i .M. I a 4 v\--\ i'.- . I \ wl i,if! �A. ti . `r( ' \‘-i-rNIklit) tit. ... 6•%* .c ".1,-. -.:'-.:7; I.,-.;'.' -6.VO t I, 11., ,.,1Z°. Wan `,. %II' . . .Al-' ., .. "et,e‘ ut Ail • .'•N, Al . ' .111111t\ •,.,',.`4.-40-40 ' :, Or ' 1‘.Q '''" L,.„'" '•-t,' '•, .••• ...4 i 'I X,\„N r:4te, A �, Vie,:4I %Iiiio M a O ......„ ° - _ -v s 00 z O A A . . CO a ei 1 I Ai d zL ; Oo � I N he 0 ab -' F- e 1 (j) Projected School Population The projected staging of development to the year 2020 will add approximately 930 housing units to the Urban Reserve Area at full saturation. Based on the allowable development density in the remainder of the township, the total number of housing units projected to the year 2020 is estimated to be 1430. An 1990 inventory of 4163 households in Shakopee indicated that 41 per cent had children . Also, it was estimated that 20 percent of the 1990 population was school age. The household occupancy rate was 2.8 per housing unit. Shadow numbers for the future Jackson Township, holding the rates and percentages as constants, suggest that the projected year 2020 school ageulation would be 800 students. This number should be compared lip with the school district forecasts. Consideration should also be given to allocating future Jackson Township populations within the Urban Reserve Area to Shakopee since annexation goes hand-in-hand with future extensions of urban services. (k) Official Map The township has purchased current digital base mapping from the county. This base mapping provides the following. 1. Surface Transportation Routes a. Existing highways, streets, driveways b. Railroads 2. Wetlands a. National Wetland Inventory b. DNR protected wetlands c. Other identified wetlands 3. Lakes, Rivers and Streams a. FEMA flood hazard zones b. Drainageways 4. Topography a. 10 ft. contours based on mean sea level datum b. Buildings and significant structures c. Fence lines 5. Woodlands 6. Parks The Official Map combines the base mapping with the Transportation Guide Plan and Urban Land Use Plan. When all components are combined the proliferation of data hinders the readability of the map. Consequently each component is presented as a separate exhibit as well. DEVELOPMENT GUIDE PLAN n MARCH,1996 AMENDMENTS 9 t y �. C hit (rr: . ` V' - ;bilis v = 1- ai � 'S'? :" . 1; ".. g A % 1J • -1„,,:vii,w,,,,„-,_.4pit- u , tf, y .-. _ --- ritrA\ 1 \=.___.70.• .,; ,, , ,,,,,..1. z rn � ��fir ; = . . „Ts • , . li rAmirlihric • kri'r ili --- -. ---- -t - r-�AwN:o v...moist �.�'� AL(---- i/2051, ly - rk,viqr s, 141), .--:--_--144 -4 AL-.,L-,-;7114111 .-17:'-'N1N - 0. IL'I A 11 1 1 il 44 �I 1. �ItrigMMI7o/65(01/4 pi rs ��c c( A 1A 1. 407,. ..,,i0., ark. I) ,,‘'‘ N ,, ,? _., ..v..: All / )i,11.‘')111.1.1. Av..lito L.Vifi .11.1141, air\k Al ls, 111*Ilk v, 41 k,,,,:iit i •,/, „,,,,, ,,, r.„... ____„, ,,,..,:„ .......,;..„ c., 1 if(qk ,,t44 4-,..... kia PI AI ..„. 1 , k -.'.= 111° A r.•.i.---\. (F6 L )1 rc-- 44 \ \il:,!,`"'. '„ kiiii„ ":Sifit-RL,b7.44 ::, NO ' i,i-.11, .,,,lorda.4.6.„- •,s",.....; .`..,-.\\ &.,„j -.04. \lk I NilrA\ \ \ , N, k : it,...%. w,i,„_, . 7 _ ---i xt„:„,_.„„\----.0„:, *lot\ ,...*;;Aisi ,. \ . \ itii,... .,,,,..,. pk, ” ... • ,..,...„ , ,..1 . ', 'ft„...4 '., :VA. X* tii./___„‘„---:-- § Ast;;,,,4%1(311146.,,,-7- R � , \ N., ,,-,1445/\,,,,,,;- ?..q 44%.„-k -- 4, ,\..., ....„ . ...,..,..,. ,_ . aW,.. ,, co 0 z p oap 0O ZWI L.0 CO 6 a 2 wm Y U iiits i • tire a A �i**`'�>lvv 'a��w•�i��� w �� ���� � " 5�'''r{s" -� �'t,��?- i�at til r.. ��tgQrs.,�r�,a7�,'7n i, s r;�, �. J• i r i i, )1), fl !a: : 3' it € ( t.A:aye s A :t4%,, . ;, '.'� - • �r `'l.. 6 ` �i,,v n avv ��P .V".-'' i t ` t„,, V Il �,r.ty$�J,,;.� } .x, 4j rte'. ��ti. .„ ,./r. _,,,,,,_,::. 1., _,- -,f,. 1 -,,,.±.,,I,:l.,,,., ..-?:),- „:„.,:,,,s. ..tt,F41t.. ....orAw- .- ,.. ri,- lip, „•,g--7,/,v:,,,,,,,r.x‘tAls,i' 7,,,I rAllfOraell r., r.,..,•;:<...,,,, ................._ ..1!, Ark ,A,.., 1-41r In-”+4."4;•.-. .eira g...-.` 0,,, . • -.Alit ._ \. 01 1 a • 1�.i , tsi l�:� .1141/4� _f/1F1Re C'p,1i,G ,'c 1 i '''.‘'f....T.,:d4.:1k744,L.-'N„,---rX 7A4.%; 1..i.,11 . .-'‘.,..\-'t c ifittlw iff/A1: '1743"? " °4 N'- ' t V . # 1.4d i,,.,,,,,,1-_,i ., ‘-:".1-,,.--,,110116'irTN-*Ii w'rik,Cri- ..., 411' . A .:1-..Y _ :-.1-s- ', .-,, -k.,. .i,:,.,,,,,.,?._,-A,,_, At vv....1_4x ,ts-f , . At., \\ "..- ') V.:711Tb,al it'll';4:2,.--,..-N!.,,,,-7,' ‘.,Th i.,,4- -'1.',-'s\_ ,. A.. 44,41:ri(„'et. SV1•zlitlill A5---v 6, Itil,,.tok...,-,.--,..-. ,.-:.. ...:,.e....-, ,,‘;1',.4,,41,4. . \IN, ,,,,,-_--,... .., ::,l'il ' '‘4,-L-y ode` ik` ,'4,fiZii .','W,-,,','i---.3.,4 ,".7.'4i--li:..,, \''',.4\-`-'-'1-)51.1 ill, \ \ i TO 411%1 1 VII;'14V:"Z;,:.,"17 N. 4,1, : '''S'.7:.-c) '.. 'NS\‘t AI i h*Nati r Ub " , ter <�. �+y -i:"., vC 1,�. �`�- L'� _ fi. , �r �t,yR. s �'Sh t '��titi, W,, i�' _...��~ .Vii 11141 F f� i , �1.�, L '4y ♦.i�:�', .-'.•4".,4,,h riftSr;,.. \ -.116:1.,!,:: ::".51';t.4:-.,.'"1/4..,:r a' of -$1t . NOally ' •'ke ? FRS Ste' , '-'l ' aililipt r 7‘ : \\;; ', ' . .---'------ V/ frillOP9! \ o0 Z . a „ o a � o o Imm J s Q v 8 z — •• 0 oV W z; Id� UI Q. N WW a 0 W CIZ Z Si 1 Q > W C R.1 _� Wg on W ...1 .... .Q., U O 031:5 O JdJ Z W W -1 ICC O C JoN LI 2 K �• Z W yQZO 7 W rA O Q Q LX 6 cr F.' O d JOY j Q H d .d.. Q U Y Y Y S U Q = j O 2 G J 6 W V q Z J U UN d' - OC O N OJd Q K '1 ,Z.. W a 2 O,..„,;,,, 40 1 ::: _ ..„.4....,, 0 .70: s vt A',. W / its is a i J / x1rc'L 1 e 7 fac1�•r i f': orTi*„. w4 9.s+.�.„.R. • 1 i II al I,.-1-" est -I+ >,.. v tk ° 1,,'"3111c7:547%1117.-; 1 J! OG42. �i t .1+, 1. tiiir. ,,--......._,.:-.0..•,,..„,,-,....-,,..... 14 fir:, biegiltv „talon ..� ;;un4n r � ;i .,,,,„„ ....„..., , ,,,1,!,# ,q4-!--a ,r,t, . ,, .-, ai X11 'i -ro,:, \' ' i - i► r �` `. �_iiiikkiiii ++'+ t -.1;':;,,....z, ,:i* * s .. i � .'++VIA 1� �J, t, ! it4, 0 i ig04 ;1.4: l tirtfi ji__---::.,...111 .1_ ::,...: (k1 fitall/k lir - -I's - ----J ‘- „ o,. , I ....:,, . ,r, ,_,11/4„ 1” t l� `}yam is ‘ 1 ' ' \' '. ili Iii 1 s ,i �' ... �. i 1, Mi* — , , 1 0 ,.. A. 1 a 16[ .7 sa i 15 A '(h '1' fS It ioi�3 .101fr— i..�.l ny_y di A g IiU .d - : t\ •:A:.---t.. .,..'t,,,., i .,--•..,.*.*, IS " s q: ", ! �` ,' t S "lb� _ Ait lli•..40/4116::::- `die m e' o cx ti c2 O I Ell01111110 10 L9 '; E. ..-" ,.!' ' r j ►� q a e o go 27 e.0, Fs! m E.,2 G p v, m S o t'" ap b ""� C a Aa n C G n ° a a e m C m C1 M (1) ' cru Z °' ° g ° 9p W �. a R �' g `b r Cry C 9 L t a 4. `° * 4a Cs7 0 == E r ,.a. tv Z 0 al 0 "Z E. p �C• mss+ :,. a _*. , .. r .„, •,. . \:\ il 1 1 ) ,._..•tra.,, . ., iv „ \„...4.,,,, ...., s , ,,I, v �'� -' iwnw IY� -/ „zip._ ilt.....c.7.10\ �q ,4„:„..,,I,.....4,,,,,:,,,.." . x r +�5+ 1 (o � D' t. r . � 1 J,� .1, T 'jF kbit i L-o v 15f { , (C) g ° 4'''' )' -I ci 1 ,j) A 1,'," iinOT-col i v �1 7 • • • - \ 1 !!yl'It 's- .11 n ccc� � f --' la ve ;;;���tttyyy _1 e ./ F sa 1• rte'. I N if a :p s ..a Z _Jam.,._ . ),,,,// .___ Ll ar.a• �� , a lfj1 y\ v *S`i" ', i ii I hc3 043fooi \ , R r- i 4. A IIn fo �r 9 h �‹` r X40 ` r , 4. i 1 f a .1 . . / ;/ es t • P1t , , 1 r i o 2 g a �9L O CSS 9- 8 ;w,,r;c 9 O (4,2 , _..... , _ _ ... , .., .. .. ...... 3n, •,....... ,_..., � /"` >r a _ = r0 2 _2g V? U3 Cl) -' L O a m c 2 - a w o `a O 'g n ,o rt m c rn -oZ m°11 D- O-I w o o vy c aaa Ii !3 oooN m a mew co o tO (Dta Q ^n h..0 2;, n 0 0 m