Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJuly 7, 2015 City Council - Regular Session RESOLUTION NO. 7585 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF VALLEY VIEW BUSINESS PARK 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, Tom Elander, applicant; and Mary Ann and Loren Gross, property nd owners, made application for final plat approval of Valley View Business Park 2 Addition on May 20, 2015; and WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as: Outlot A, Valley View Business Park 1st Addition; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the final plat application on July 7, 2015 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota that the final plat of Valley View Business Park 2nd Addition is hereby APPROVED subject to the following conditions: The following actions must be addressed prior to release of the Final Plat for recording: 1.The signature block on the final plat must be revised. City Administrator must be removed and a signature block for City Clerk must be added. 2.An additional 10 of drainage and utility easement must be added to the existing 10 proposed drainage and utility easement along the southern lot line of Lot 1 for a total of 20 of drainage and utility easement for the future extension of watermain. If a future extension of watermain to Outlot A through the southern drainage and utility easement involves removal of significant trees on Lot 1, the developer of Outlot A will be required to replace trees at a 4:1 (Remove: Replace) ratio and restore turf to the disturbed areas of Lot 1. The owner of Lot 1 will be notified prior to work commencing within the easement area. 3.Park Dedication Fees based on net lot area must be paid at the current adopted fee schedule rate. The applicant must provide calculations of the total lot area and the total area of public utility easements on the lot for calculation of the fee to the Parks and Recreation Director. 4.The applicant must provide electronic files (AutoCAD and PDF) of the Final Plat to be record. The files must be recorded on datum on the Scott County Coordinate System. The following items must be addressed prior to approval of a grading permit, a building permit and/or a street and utility plan: 1.The applicant must obtain a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) construction site permit prior to any land disturbing activity and provide PDF documents of the coverage card and coverage letters to the Engineering Department. 2.The applicant will grade the entire site, as proposed on the approved plans, in one phase within one (1) year of the date of approval of a grading permit application. 3.All landscaping must comply with the City of Shakopee Easement, Fencing, and Landscaping Policy. 4.The applicant must submit a detailed impervious surface drawing of Lot 1. 5.The applicant must pay the Trunk Stormwater Charge, as required by the current City of Shakopee fee schedule. 6.Any tree removal on the site is subject to the Tree Preservation Regulations, City Code Section 11.60, Subdv 9 7.The applicant must work with Scannell Properties and City Natural Resources Staff to provide required replacement trees from the initial subdivision of Valley st View Business Park 1 Addition on this site, per Resolution No 7327. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the _____ day of ____________________, 2015. ________________________________ Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: ________________________ Lori Hensen, Acting City Clerk engineeringplanningenvironmentalconstruction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 June 19, 2015 Mr. Bruce Loney City of Shakopee 500 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Re:Patterson Drive –Storm Water Management Study Proposal to Identify Improvements for Flooding/ Channel ErosionAbatement Dear Mr. Loney: We appreciate the opportunity to assist you in identifying solutions to address the floodingand channel erosionissues in the area of Patterson Drive. After meeting with you and your staff on th June 17, we have a better understanding of your needs and expectations for this work. Outlined below please find the work plan associated with completing the project. Task 1 –Review the Existing Storm Water Hydrologic Model for the Area. This task consists of reviewing the existing Storm Water HydroCAD modelfor the City of Shakopee, specifically the MPGSubwatershed. This review may also include the following: Review Parameters Used to Estimate Peak Discharges This Task includes reviewing the general parameters used to establish the individual subwatershed discharges and determine if the model needs to be adjusted to accommodate changes in land use, etc. The existing HydroCAD model usesTP-40 methodology. During our meeting, the use ofAtlas 14 rainfall was selected for the analysis. Parameters reviewed typically include: acreage, land use, design rainfall event, impervious surface coverage, anticipated discharge rates, anticipated runoff volumes, etc. This task will include collection of background data used for the existing model. Data may include existing and future land use mapping, aerial photography, City parcel records, GIS shapefiles, existing zoning and land use regulations, etc.An existingpeak Atlas 14100-YR discharge design rate will be determined through this effort. Please note that a portionof this work has already been completed by WSB staff. We estimate up to an additional 16hours of staff time to complete this effort. Task 2-Review surroundinginfrastructurein the immediate vicinity of Patterson Drive and determine if improvements are required/ recommended. We will review as-builts as well as perform field observation of the channel and culvert under St. Cloud Minneapolis St. Paul Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com C:\\Windows\\TEMP\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@B804374B\\@BCL@B804374B.docx Mr. Bruce Loney June19, 2015 Page 2 Patterson Drive. Some of this effort hasalready been completed by WSB staff. We will review and provide options/ recommendations on improvements and or maintenance required, including an option for additional flood protection forthe low-lying property closest to the channel at Patterson Drive, options for channelimprovement/ repairat thedownstream end closest to Patterson Drive, options for additional capacity under Patterson Drive, and options for extending the outlet pipe northcloser to the pond bottom to alleviate erosion potential and improve aesthetics of the slope to the pond. We estimate up to 30hours of staff time to complete this effort. If additional survey work is required, this will be added to the fee at a cost of $225/ hr for survey crew. Task 3–Prepare construction plans and assist in bidding of corrective/ flood protection work Based on information collected as part of previous tasks, and upon approval to move forward with desired alternatives identified by you, we will prepare construction documents to be used for bidding. We will also provide engineer’s estimates for the improvements and assist with the bidding process. We estimate up to 60 hours of staff time for this effort. Construction inspection would be an additional service. Estimated Cost Tasks 1 –3are proposed to be completed on an hourly basis for an estimated not-to-exceed cost of $13,300. If the scope changes or additional options beyond that outlined above are requested, the fee above would increase accordingly. Additional survey and construction observation are not included in these numbers and can be added to the scope at additional fees. Please call me if you would like to discuss or need additional information. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jeffry S.Sandberg, PE Senior Project Manager ACCEPTED BY: City of Shakopee By: Title: Date: C:\\Windows\\TEMP\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@B804374B\\@BCL@B804374B.docx engineeringplanningenvironmentalconstruction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 June 19, 2015 Mr. Bruce Loney City of Shakopee 500 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Re:Danube Avenue Area Erosion Proposal to Identify Alternatives to Address Wash-out Area Dear Mr. Loney: We appreciate the opportunity to assist you in identifying solutions to address the washout area of the channel adjacent to Danube Avenue. This washout occurred following the unusual June th 2014 rainfall event. After meeting with you and your staff on June 17, we have a better understanding of your needs and expectations for this work. Outlined below please find the work plan associated with completing the project. Task 1 –Review the Existing Storm Water Hydrologic Model for the Area. This task consists of reviewing the existing Storm Water HydroCAD modelfor the City of Shakopee, specifically the MP-2 Subwatershedand the Countryside Development storm water modeling. This review may also include the following: Review Parameters Used to Estimate Peak Discharges This Task includes reviewing the general parameters used to establish the individual subwatershed discharges and determine if the model needs to be adjusted to accommodate changes in land use, etc. The current HydroCAD modelusesTP-40 methodologyand rainfall values. You have expressed a desire to have this effort modeled / converted to XPSWMM. We have accounted for that in our proposed fee. Parameters reviewed typically include: acreage, land use, design rainfall event, impervious surface coverage, anticipated discharge rates, anticipated runoff volumes, etc. This task will include collection of background data used for the existing model. Data may include existing and future land use mapping, aerialphotography, City parcel records, GIS shapefiles, existing zoning and land use regulations, etc.An existingpeak Atlas 14 100-YR discharge design rate will be determined through this effort. The proposed conditions peak flow rate is estimated to be lessthan existing rates once development occurs upstream. We estimate up to 20hours of staff time for this effort. St. Cloud Minneapolis St. Paul EqualOpportunity Employer wsbeng.com C:\\Windows\\TEMP\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@BC04F654\\@BCL@BC04F654.docx Mr. Bruce Loney June 19, 2015 Page 2 Task 2 –Prepare up to 3 alternative designs for repair of the washout area This Task will utilize the design peak discharge determined in Task 1 and provide up to 3 alternatives that will provide storm water conveyance up to the 100-YR design event. Maintenance, aesthetics, and functionality will be considered for each option prepared. We estimate up to 20 hours of staff time for this effort. Task 3 -Review down-stream infrastructure and determine if improvements are required/ recommended. We will review as-builts as well as perform field observation of the channel and culvert under Danube Avenue that is immediately downstream of the erosion issue. We will review and provide options/ recommendations on improvements and or maintenance required. We estimate up to 5 hours of staff time for this effort. Task 4–Prepare construction plans and assist in bidding of corrective work Based on information collected as part of previous tasks, and upon approval to move forward with desired alternatives identifiedby you, we will prepare construction documents to be used for bidding. We will also provide engineer’s estimates for the improvements and assist with the bidding process. We estimate up to 32 hours of staff time for this effort. Estimated Cost Tasks 1 –4are proposed to be completed on an hourly basis for an estimated not-to-exceed cost of $8,850. If the scope changes or additional options beyond that outlined above are requested, the fee above would increase accordingly.Survey was done in 2014 and the estimated costs in this proposal assumes that data is generally representative of the areaand can be utilized for design. If additional survey is required, upon your approval, we will complete that task at a rate of $225/ hour for a survey crew. Please call me if you would like to discuss or need additional information. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jeffry S.Sandberg, PE Senior Project Manager ACCEPTED BY: City of Shakopee By: Title: Date: C:\\Windows\\TEMP\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@BC04F654\\@BCL@BC04F654.docx engineeringplanningenvironmentalconstruction 701 XeniaAvenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 June 19, 2015 Mr. Bruce Loney City of Shakopee 500 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Re:Hwy 101 Crossing North of Amazon Parcel Proposal to Perform Drainage Study Dear Mr. Loney: We appreciate the opportunity to assist you in performing a drainage study adjacent to the Hwy 101 crossing in the vicinity of the Amazon parcel. There is some question regarding how the drainage functions/ where it goes in this area and whether improvements are needed in the sub- watershedto facilitate storm water management due todevelopment that has occurred or is th anticipated in the sub-watershed. After meeting with you and your staff on June 17, we have a better understanding of your needs and expectations for this work. Outlined below please find the work plan associated with completing the project. Task 1 –Review the Existing Storm Water Hydrologic Model for the Area. This task consists of reviewing the existing Storm Water HydroCAD modelfor the City of Shakopee, specifically the subwatershedthat includes the Amazon parceland the draft Interstate Trucking analysis. This review may also include the following: Review Parameters Used to Estimate Discharges This Task includes reviewing the general parameters used to establish the individual subwatershed discharges and determine if the model needs to be adjusted to accommodate changes in land use, etc. The current HydroCAD model usesTP-40 precipitationvalues. You have expressed a desireto have this effort modeled / converted to XPSWMM. The proposed fee reflects this. Parameters reviewed typically include: acreage, land use, design rainfall event, impervious surface coverage, anticipated discharge rates, anticipated runoff volumes, etc. We know that there are several upstream sites that need to be added to the model. This task will also include collection of background data used for the existing model. Data may include existing and future land use mapping, aerial photography, City parcel records, GIS shapefiles, existing zoning and land use regulations, etc.The flow patterns under Hwy 101 willbe determined through this effort. Survey data willbe required to confirm grades and pipe locations and grade. Thefield survey fees will be added once the project limits have been defined. We estimate up to 26hours of staff time for this effort (not including survey). St. Cloud Minneapolis St. Paul Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com C:\\Windows\\TEMP\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@C0046356\\@BCL@C0046356.docx Mr. Bruce Loney June 19, 2015 Page 2 It should be noted that the TH 101 culvert crossings were evaluated by WSB in 2008 using TP-40 precipitation values. This evaluation recommended increasing the TH 101 24” culvert downstream of the RR and Amazon parcel to 36” RCP. It is our understanding that the pipe under east-bound CSAH 101 was replaced as recommended as a part of the turnback to Scott County. The west-bound pipe willrequire verification as a part ofthis study. We will also make sure this effort is coordinated with future trail crossings that are currently being contemplated. Task 2 –Identify potential flooding issues and make recommendations on alternatives for remedying said issues. This Task will utilize the design peak dischargesdetermined in Task 1 and provide up to 3 alternatives that will provide flood protection to properties and infrastructure up to the design event(if deemed necessary through results of Task 1). Maintenance, aesthetics, and functionality will be considered for each option prepared. These options will be schematic in nature. If design documents are required, a subsequent work order will need tobe executed. We estimate up to 16 hours of staff time for this effort. Task 3 -Review down-stream infrastructure and determine if improvementsand or maintenanceare required/ recommended. We will review as-builts as well as perform field observation of the stormwater infrastructurethat is immediately downstream of the Amazon parcel, including culverts under Hwy 101 and culverts under the rail road (RR maintained). The downstream conveyance to Mill Pond will be evaluated. It is recommended that a survey be performed on the downstream flow pathto Mill Pond. We will review and provide options/ recommendations on improvements and or maintenance requiredand assist your Public Works staff in requesting maintenance/ improvements of infrastructure that is the responsibility of others. We estimate up to 24hours of staff time for this effort, not including survey. Estimated Cost Tasks 1 –3are proposed to be completed on an hourly basis for an estimated not-to-exceed cost of $8,200. If the scope changes or additional options beyond that outlined above are requested, the fee above would increase accordingly.If field survey is orderedto complete Task 1, upon your approval, we will provide up to 2 days of field survey for an additionalhourly not-to- exceed cost of $3,600.If field survey is ordered to complete Task 3, upon your approval, we will provide up to 2 days of field survey for an additional hourly not-to-exceed cost of $3,600. There will be savings to the city if these two surveys can be combined in to one effort. C:\\Windows\\TEMP\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@C0046356\\@BCL@C0046356.docx Mr. Bruce Loney June 19, 2015 Page 3 Please call me if you would like to discuss or need additional information. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jeffry S.Sandberg, PE Senior Project Manager ACCEPTED BY: City of Shakopee By: Title: Date: C:\\Windows\\TEMP\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@C0046356\\@BCL@C0046356.docx engineeringplanningenvironmentalconstruction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 June 19, 2015 Mr. Bruce Loney City of Shakopee 500 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Re:Storm Water Management Study Upper Valley DrainagewayAnalyzed in XPSWMM Dear Mr. Loney: We appreciate the opportunity to assist you in performing a drainage study in the Upper Valley subwatershed. The intent of the study is to update the existing Upper Valley Drainageway (UVD) Storm Water Hydrologic model, which is currently in HydroCAD using TP-40 rainfall, toXPSWMMsoftware. The updated model will assist the city in identifying regional storm water management opportunities/ improvements based ondevelopment that has occurred or is th anticipated to occur in the sub-watershed. After meetingwith you and your staff on June 17, we have a better understanding of your needs and expectations for this work. Outlined below please find the work plan associated with completing the project. Task 1 –Review the Existing Storm Water Hydrologic Modelfor the Area. This task consists of reviewing the existing UVD Storm Water HydroCAD modelfor the City of Shakopee. This review may also include the following: Review Parameters Used to Estimate Discharges This Task includes reviewing the general parameters used to establish the individual subwatershed discharges and determine if the model needs to be adjusted to accommodate changes in land use, etc. The number of subwatersheds will be limited to the delineations in the SWMP. Parameters reviewed typically include: acreage, land use, design rainfall event, impervious surface coverage, anticipated discharge rates, anticipated runoff volumes, etc. This task will include collection of background data used for the existing model. Data may include existing and future land use mapping, aerial photography, City parcel records, GIS shapefiles, existing zoning and land use regulations, etc. The existing model will be converted to a new model as efficiently as possible. It is anticipated that ponding areas and other improvements in the watershed will need to be added to the existing model to ensure that the proposed model is as accurate asfeasibly possible. We estimate up to 80 hours of staff time for this effort. St. Cloud Minneapolis St. Paul Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com C:\\Windows\\TEMP\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@C404709C\\@BCL@C404709C.docx Mr. Bruce Loney June 19, 2015 Page 2 We will use existing city as-built information as well as Lidar topo information for this effort. The city GIS database of the storm sewer pipe data with size, type, inverts, and shape will be provided by the city if available. If not available, only primary trunk conveyance systems will be input. If flood prone properties are to be analyzed, it will be done as an additional task at additional fees. No field survey is anticipated or accommodated in this proposal. If it is found that field survey is required, that service can be provided atan additional fee. Task 2 –Identify potential areas for regional ponding and storm water conveyance systems to be utilized once development occurs. This Task will utilize the design peak dischargesdetermined in Task 1 and provide a schematic map that highlightslocations of potential regional storm water managementopportunities. If design documents are required, a subsequent work order will need tobe executed. We estimate up to 10 hours of staff time for this effort. As discussed with staff, this effort will include identifying potential improvements to alleviate flooding that has occurred near Larkspur Court. Estimated Cost Tasks 1 –2are proposed to be completed on an hourly basis for an estimated not-to-exceed cost of $10,900. If the scope changes or additional options beyond that outlined above are requested, the fee above would increase accordingly. Please call me if you would like to discuss or need additional information. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jeffry S.Sandberg, PE Senior Project Manager ACCEPTED BY: City of Shakopee By: Title: Date: C:\\Windows\\TEMP\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@C404709C\\@BCL@C404709C.docx Funds transferred electronically June 16, 2015 to July 7, 2015 PAYROLL $ 548,813.81 FIT/FICA$ 161,731.12 STATE INCOME TAX$ 32,381.75 PERA$ 148,660.85 HCSP$ 16,440.55 $ 25,830.50 NATIONWIDE ICMA$ 2,426.22 MSRS$ 6,044.60 HEALTH SAVING ACCOUNT$ 10,496.20 FSA$ 6,289.52 $ 118,620.25 MEDICA $ 5,787.87 AFLAC $ 2,386.65 NIS $ 1,085,909.89 TOTAL RESOLUTION NO. 7541 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING DAVID BRUNSTO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTADVISORY COMMITTEE WHEREAS, a vacancy exists on the Economic Development Advisory Committee as a result of Jim Mahoney’s resignation prior to the scheduled end of his term. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that David Brunsis hereby appointed to fill the unexpired term, from July 8, 2015 to February 28, 2016. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, th Minnesota, held this 7day of July, 2015. __________________________ Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: __________________________ Acting City Clerk