The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFebruary 07, 2017 City Engineers Association of MN (CEAM) Municipal Project of the Year Award for 2016 Nomination Form (Please Type or Print – Three Page Application Form Plus up to 10 Additional Sheets) Submit Application Electronically to Marc Culver, Roseville Public Works Director At marc.culver@cityofroseville.com Deadline is November 29, 2016 APPLICATIONS MUST BE FOR MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED IN 2016 Projects will be scored on the items below. Note that items 7-13 will be scored as a group for a total of 40 percentage points for Project Elements. Therefore, if you did not, for example, have a particularly notable Community Relations component to your project, but your Environmental Considerations were outstanding, focus the narrative on that element and you won’t be penalized for not having the Community Relations element. SANITARYSEWERLATERALPIPEREHABILITATIONPROGRAM 1.Name of Project: 2.Name and Address of the following: Municipality CityofShakopee a): BruceLoney,PE;PublicWorksDirector 500GormanSt Shakopee,MN55379 b) Prime Contractor: NationalWaterMainCleaningCompany(NWMCC) JamesLounsbery 1806NewarkTurnpike KearnyNJ07032 Design Engineer ShortElliottHendrickson,Inc. c): PaulJ.PaskoIII 10901RedCircleDrive,Suite300 Minnetonka,MN55343 3.Brief description of project (electronic photographs and renderings may be submitted if desired). TheCityofShakopeetookaproactiveapproachtosewermaintenancewithamultiyearprojecttostrengthen privatelyownedsanitarysewerlateralpipes.Thenodigmethodofinstallinganewpipeinsideofanexisting lateralpipesignificantlyreducesthechanceoffailure,andprotectsthe/źƷǤ͸ƭinvestmentinstreetsand boulevards. Attheconclusionof{ŷğƉƚƦĻĻ͸ƭstreetrehabilitationproject,theonlyoldpipe remainingunderthenewstreetsweretheprivatelyownedlaterals.Tosafeguardits investmentinnewstreetpavement,adjacentboulevardrestorationandexisting ownexpenseusingthe boulevardtreestheCityisrehabilitatingtheselateralsatits trenchlessblindshotCuredInPlacePipe(CIPP)method.Shakopeeisthefirst communityintheTwinCitiestospecifytheblindshotmethodofinstallingCIPPat lengthsof2530ft.Intheillustrationprovided,theportionofthesanitarysewer lateralpipesthatwasrehabilitatediscoloredred. City Engineers Association of MN (CEAM) Municipal Project of the Year Award for 2016 Nomination Form (Please Type or Print – Three Page Application Form Plus up to 10 Additional Sheets) Submit Application Electronically to Marc Culver, Roseville Public Works Director At marc.culver@cityofroseville.com Deadline is November 29, 2016 Besidesrehabilitatingthelateralpipefromthesewer maintojustbeyondthecurbandgutter,thisCIPP methodalsoincludesafullcircumferentialCIPPwrap ofthemainextendingabout1ft.upanddownstream ofthelateral,andisinstalledwithoutneedinga cleanouttoaccesstheupstreamendofthelateral pipe.TheCityofShakopeewillrehabilitate approximately150lateralsperyearoverafiveyear period. 4.Final completion date contained in contract and any authorized time extension. Startingin2015andcontinuingthroughatleast2019,theCitywillrehabilitate approximately150lateralsperyear.Phase1oftheprojectincludedrehabilitating 144lateralpipeswithinthenineblockresidentialarea. Phase1constructionbeganinSeptember2015,andtheprojectwassubstantially completeinNovemberof2015.Currently,Phase1isinitsͻ/ƚƩƩĻĭƷźƚƓtĻƩźƚķͼͲ throughNovemberof2017whenafinalinspectionwillbeperformedandthe contractclosed. Theprojectwascompletedonschedule,withallcontractworkrelatedtothe rehabilitationcompletedwithin11weeks.Nocontracttimeextensionswere needed. 5.Public benefit and service nature of project. Completionofthisprojectensuresthatpropertyownerswillnotincurtheexpenseorinconvenienceofa fundedentirelybythe/źƷǤ͸ƭEnterprise sewerlateralpipefailurebeneaththe/źƷǤ͸ƭstreets.Theprojectis fund. 6.Design characteristics and features or innovations. TheblindshotmethodofinstallingCIPPincludestheinstallationoftheCIPP byenteringasewermanholeinthestreet,andnavigatingthesewermain withroboticequipmentandͻƭŷƚƚƷźƓŭͼtheCIPPlinerintothelateralpipe, withouttheneedofacleanoutorexcavationtoaccessthelateralpipe itself. Applyingthisinnovativemethodonaprojectofthismagnituderequires highlyskilledcontractors.{9I͸ƭprojectteamdeterminedhowtoattract outofstatecontractorstoShakopeeataneconomicalbidprice.Exhaustive researchwithengineersandcontractorsaroundthecountryrevealedthat thewaytodoitwastocreativelydevelopbiddingdocumentsallowing contractorstoinstalllinersmeetingeitherASTM1216orASTM2561to challengeeachotherbybiddingtheprojectheadtohead. sewer IntheCityofShakopee,theprimaryreasonforthefailureofaging lateralpipesisrootintrusion.ProductsmeetingeitherASTM1216orASTM 2561areeffectiveinprovidingthestructuralrehabilitationofthesewer lateralpipestopreventfuturefailurebyrootintrusion.BecausetheCity allowedproductsmeetingeitherspecification,thepoolofcontractorsthat City Engineers Association of MN (CEAM) Municipal Project of the Year Award for 2016 Nomination Form (Please Type or Print – Three Page Application Form Plus up to 10 Additional Sheets) Submit Application Electronically to Marc Culver, Roseville Public Works Director At marc.culver@cityofroseville.com Deadline is November 29, 2016 areabletocompletetheworkincreasedsignificantly,creatingamplecompetitionandtheresulting competitivepricing. 7.Construction management scheduling and control techniques used. Fromthestart,theprojectteamknewdetailedcoordinationandtimingwereessentialinordertoefficiently completeeachphaseoftheprojectandminimizeinconveniencetothepropertyowners.Toachievethis,the CityrequiredthattheContractorfollowthestepbystepprocedureasoutlined: Foreachmanholetomanholesegmentofthesanitarysewercollectionsysteminthe project,thecontractorwouldfirstcleaneachlateralpipe,andperformavideo inspectionofeachlateralpipedocumentingitsconditionpriortorehabilitation.Next theContractorwouldsubmittheirproposedplanforrehabilitationofeachlateral pipe,requestingthe/źƷǤ͸ƭapprovaltocompletetherehabilitation.Onceapproval wasobtained,theContractorwouldcommencerehabilitationofthelateralpipesin theapprovedsegment. Usingthismethod,theContractorcompletedtherehabilitationonastreetbystreet basisΑmethodicallycompletingtheprojectfromeasttowest.Astheproject progressed,therehabilitationstatuswaspublishedontheprojectwebpage,and eNotificationsweresentalertingsubscriberstothe/ƚƓƷƩğĭƷƚƩ͸ƭwhereaboutsand theirplansforcompletingtheremainingworkontheproject. 8.Environmental considerations – summary of steps taken to protect the environment during construction and compatibility of finished project with the pre-existing environment. CIPPtechnologyofferssignificantsustainableenvironmentalbenefitscomparedtothetraditionaldigand replacemethod.Thismethodofrehabilitatingexistinglateralpipesrequiresnoexcavationordisturbanceto existinginfrastructure,whileminimizingimpactstothesurroundingenvironment.Successfulrehabilitationvia atleast50years. CIPPextendstheservicelifeofthelateralpipeby Byusingtheblindshotmethod,theCitywasabletoavoidtheenvironmentalimpactscausedbyexcavations andtheirsubsequentrestorationactivities,aswellasthetime,monetarycosts,andnuisancetoproperty ownersassociatedwiththeinstallationofcleanouts. 9.Community relations – Summary of efforts to protect public lives and property, minimize public inconvenience, and improve relations between contractor personnel and the public. Inpreparationfortheconstructionphaseoftheproject,SEHandtheCityusedamultimediacampaignto educatepropertyownersaboutwhyandhowtheCitywouldrehabilitatethefirst30feetoftheirlateralpipes. tohiretheirown TheCityalsodesignedaninternalprocesstoassistpropertyownerswhomightwish contractortorehabilitatethebalanceoftheirlateralpipe,afterconstructiononthe/źƷǤ͸ƭcontractwas complete.TheCityhostedalivepublicinformational meetingwhichwasrecordedandpostedonthe/źƷǤ͸ƭ projectspecificwebpage,forfutureviewing. Onceconstructionbegan,theCityutilizedtheproject webpage,mapsandvideospostedonthatwebpage, andthe/źƷǤ͸ƭeNotificationtooltocommunicateproject updatesandotherimportantinformationtosubscribers. Inaddition,theContractoruseddoorhangersandface tofacecommunicationtocoordinatetherehabilitation ofeachlateralpipewithintheproject,andminimizethe inconveniencetothepropertyowners. City Engineers Association of MN (CEAM) Municipal Project of the Year Award for 2016 Nomination Form (Please Type or Print – Three Page Application Form Plus up to 10 Additional Sheets) Submit Application Electronically to Marc Culver, Roseville Public Works Director At marc.culver@cityofroseville.com Deadline is November 29, 2016 Uponcompletionoftheconstructionphaseoftheproject,aletterwassenttoeachpropertyownerdescribing theresultsoftherehabilitationoftheirpipe.Italsoincludedinstructionsforhowtoaccessthevideofootage abouthowtorehabilitate ofthepostrehabilitationconditionoftheirpipeonthe/źƷǤ͸ƭGIS,andinformation therestoftheirpipe,ifthepropertyownerwishes. 10.Safety performance and overall safety program employed during construction. AllNationalWaterMainCleaningCompany(NWMCC)employeessubmittoacomprehensive orientationprogram,whichincludesextensivesafetytraining.Trainingtopicspresentedinorientation senseofthesafetycultureoutlinedspecifically areintendedtoexposetheteamtoadiverse throughout29CFR1910and29CFR1926OSHAregulationssothattheycanbegintobuildaͷƭğŅĻƷǤ ĭǒƌƷǒƩĻ͸foundationintheGeneralIndustryandConstructionIndustry. Aftersuccessfulcompletionofachallengingprobationaryemploymentperiod,thenewemployeesof NWMCCarerequiredtoattendmandatoryannualsustainmenttraining,whichservesasarefresheron thesafetycoursestheyoriginallyattended,inadditiontoprovidingupdatesonregulations,statues, policiesandprocedures.AlltrainingcoursesprovidedtoNWMCCemployeesfollowh{I!͸ƭ29CFR Instructor,coursematerials, 1910.120App.EregulationswhereasNWMCChasatrainingfacility, proficiencyassessments,andadministrativesupport. Withdedicatedpersonnel,excellentcommunicationbetweenthefieldcrews,projectmanagerand Shakopeeofficials,andthankstodetaileddailyreports,theprojectwasstreamlinedandaccurate. NWMCCwastaskedtoclean,televise,andinstallmorethan100laterallinersduringan11week period.TheNWMCCFieldSuperintendentprovidedoversightforthisproject,whichincluded supervising,mentoring,troubleshootingmechanicalandmaintenancefailures,orderingand maintainingaccuratesupplies,andensuringthatallcrewsworkedsafelyanddiligentlywhileobtaining fieldproductionatarateneverachievedbeforebyanyothercrewinthehistoryofba//͸ƭlateral liningdivision. ba//͸ƭOSHA/DOTComplianceAdministratoroversawthecrewsdeployedforthisassignmentand ensuredthattheirsafetytrainingwasutilizedtoitsfullestpotential.Confinedspaceswereentered multipletimesaday,withoutincident;fallprotectionwasusedseveraltimesashift,withoutincident; materialwaspreppedandinstalledeveryday,withoutincidentorexposure;safetyequipmentwas worndayinanddayout,withoutincident;etc.MattandtheOSHA/DOTComplianceAdministrator spokeonceaweektocommunicateallSafetyandDOTupdates;noviolationswerereportedandall inspectionswerepassedbynumerousagencieswhoinspectedourvehicles.Themenonba//͸ƭ crewsassignedtotheShakopeeprojectshowedwhatba//͸ƭtruecapabilitiesarewithgreat leadership,communication,andteamwork.NWMCCcontinuestostrivetowardsexcellenceandthe ExecutiveManagementcontinuestoseethatwithouremployeeseveryday. City Engineers Association of MN (CEAM) Municipal Project of the Year Award for 2016 Nomination Form (Please Type or Print – Three Page Application Form Plus up to 10 Additional Sheets) Submit Application Electronically to Marc Culver, Roseville Public Works Director At marc.culver@cityofroseville.com Deadline is November 29, 2016 11.Unusual accomplishments under adverse conditions; including but not limited to adverse weather, soil, or other site conditions or constraints over which the contractor had no control. Twocommonproblemsthatchallengenearlyeverylateral CIPPliningprojectarethepresenceofbroken/offsetpipe jointsandrootintrusion.Fortunately,onlyonelateralhad anoffsetjointsevereenoughtowarranttheinstallationofa cleanouttosupportcleaning,inspectionandliningofthat particularlateral.NWMCCalsoencounteredonebroken lateralpipe.Thebreakwasinthefloorofthepipe(see photosatright,thepreandpostrehabilitationconditionof thepipe). Thisbreaksnaggedba//͸ƭcleaningequipmentasitwentpastthebreak. NWMCChadtorescueitscleaningequipmentfromthelateralbyinstallinga cleanout. However,rootintrusionwasamorecommonprobleminShakopee.Someofthe rootintrusionchallengesdealtwithbyNWMCC.Onelateralrequiredthe installationofacleanoutjusttoremovetherootsinthepipe.TheCityanticipatesissuinga$35,000change acknowledgingͷŷĻğǝǤ͸rootcleaningcompletedbyNWMCC.TheCitydecidedhowmuchrootcleaning order toconsiderͷŷĻğǝǤ͸afterconsideringthecontentsoftheirpostrehabilitatonCCTVinspectionsfromtheproject ğƩĻğ͸ƭpreviouslycompletedmainrehabilitationproject. TheCityhadmadetheseCCTVinspectionsavailabletothe biddersduringthepreparationofbidsinanefforttoassist bidderswiththecalculationoftheirbidunitpricesfor cleaningandinspectingtheprojectğƩĻğ͸ƭlaterals(see photosatrightofrootsthatwereremovedduringthe project). 12.Construction innovations. ThestakesarehighinblindshotCIPP.Theprocessistoenterasewermanholeinthestreet,navigatethe sewermainwithroboticequipmentandshoottheCIPPlinerintothelateralpipewithouttheneedofaclean outorexcavation.Mistakescouldresultinmaterialsand/orequipmentfailurethatwouldrequireexcavationΑ defeatingthepurposeofthenodigmethod. Tominimizethechancesoffailure,andsuccessfullyemploytheblindshotmethod,theContractormusttake precisemeasurementstocorrectlysizeandmanufacturetheCIPPmaterials.Inadditiontocarefulpreparation ofthereceivinglateralpipe,andtheCIPPmaterialsthemselves,theContractorisresponsibleformeticulously maintainingtheroboticequipmentandthecamerasusedtoremotelyshoottheCIPPlinerintothelateral pipe.Theconfigurationoftheroboticequipmentandcamerasusediscustomizedforeachrehabilitation,and mustbeproperlyplannedforthesuccessfulrehabilitationofeachlateralpipe.Forthisreason,ongoing maintenance,properlytrainedandexperiencedcontractors,andseamlessplanningandcommunicationis criticaltotheoverallsuccessoftheproject,andtheminimizationofimpactstopropertyowners. City Engineers Association of MN (CEAM) Municipal Project of the Year Award for 2016 Nomination Form (Please Type or Print – Three Page Application Form Plus up to 10 Additional Sheets) Submit Application Electronically to Marc Culver, Roseville Public Works Director At marc.culver@cityofroseville.com Deadline is November 29, 2016 13.Construction quality. Priortotheactualrehabilitation,eachlateralpipewasthoroughlycleanedand aCCTVinspectionwasperformedtodocumenttheprerehabilitationcondition. OnlyafterreviewingandapprovingtheinspectionfootageandtheContractors rehabilitationplan,wouldtherehabilitationprocessbegin. Specialcarewastakenthroughouttherehabilitationprocesstoensurethatthe productwasinstalledinaqualitymanner.Duringeachrehabilitation,the contractormaintainedadetailedlogwhichrecordedtheinstallationpractices toensurequality.Thislogcontainedinformationrelatingtotheambient weather,fabriclinertubelotnumberandmeasurements,resinlotnumbers temperatureandtime,hostpipemainandlateral andmixproportions,cure measurementsandmaterialtype,andthephysicalstreetaddressassociated witheachrehabilitation. Afterrehabilitationwascomplete,eachlateralpipewasagainsubjectedtoa CCTVinspection,todocumentthepostrehabilitationcondition,andtoensurethatthelateral pipewassatisfactorilyrehabilitatedandwasnotobstructedpriortoitsreturntoregularuse. Beforeeachphaseoftheprojectiscompletedandthecontractclosed,aCorrectionPeriod CCTVinspectionwillalsobeperformed(attwoyearsaftersubstantialcompletion),toensure thatthelateralpiperemainsinasatisfactory,unobstructedcondition,andthattheCIPP continuestoshownoevidenceoflossofintegrity.UponacceptanceoftheCorrectionPeriod CCTVinspectionsandclosureofthecontract,thefiveyearwarrantyperiodwillbegin. AlloftheseCCTVinspectionvideosareavailabletopropertyownerstoviewonthe/źƷǤ͸ƭGIS iftheywish. 14.Nominated by (Deadline is November 29, 2016) Printed Name: Date: Jennifer Schumann 11/28/16 Address: 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 Phone: 952-912-2613 15.Name of public agency administering the contract: CityofShakopee MEMORANDUM TO: Bruce Loney, PE FROM: Jennifer Schumann Kaitlin Swanson Emily Steinweg Mike Ostendorf DATE: January 4, 2017 RE: Sanitary Sewer Manhole Evaluation - Preliminary Engineering Report SEH No. SHAKO 139429 14.00 Background The City of Shakopee has retained Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) to provide inspection services and condition analysis of sanitary sewer manholes as part of the Sanitary Sewer Manhole Inspection and Evaluation scope of services agreement dated October 3, 2016. This Memorandum is the deliverable for Phase 2, including discussion of our findings and alternatives for rehabilitation along with estimated costs associated with each alternative. This Memorandum is intended to serve as a discussion guide to facilitate further discussions with City Staff to ultimately select a rehabilitation method to be used in the remaining Phases 3 and 4 of this project. The project location is within the City of Shakopee along US Hwy 169 and is bounded by Marystown Road on the west to Gateway Drive on the east. See the attached Figures 1 – 4 for the project location. A total of 57 manholes were inspected on November 21 and December 6 during Phase 1 of the project. Inspection of the manholes determined corrosion to be the primary concern. Corrosion has occurred within the manholes included in this study, resulting from the microbiologically induced corrosion (MIC) process that takes place in wastewater collection systems. MIC occurs when hydrogen sulfide compounds are transformed into sulfuric acid, in the presence of bacteria and oxygen. MIC takes place directly over the wastewater surface, and can quickly cause serious structural damage. Rehabilitation of select manholes experiencing MIC may result in the migration of bacteria to a more suitable environment, such as a nearby unprotected concrete manhole. Evaluation of Defects Each manhole’s condition was rated from ‘very poor’ to ‘excellent’ condition based on the level of corrosion present. The ratings are listed in Table 1, and are shown on the attached Figures 1 - 4. There were six ratings used for the manholes including ‘very poor’, ‘poor’, ‘fair’, ‘good’, ‘very good’ and ‘excellent’. No evidence of inflow or infiltration was discovered. See the below descriptions and photos illustrating each condition rating. Very Poor Manholes having a rating of ‘very poor’ would show evidence of heavy corrosion throughout the entire depth of the structure, exposed aggregate and exposed reinforcing steel. No manholes were rated as ‘very poor’. ‘Very poor’ manholes are recommended to be rehabilitated within 6 months to 1 year. Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 SEH is 100% employee-owned | sehinc.com | 952.912.2600 | 800.734.6757 | 888.908.8166 fax Sanitary Sewer Manhole Evaluation - Preliminary Engineering Report January 4, 2017 Page 2 Poor The ‘poor’ condition rating includes heavy corrosion throughout the majority of the manhole and exposed aggregate. Three of the 57 manholes inspected received a rating of ‘poor’. ‘Poor’ manholes are recommended to be rehabilitated within 1 to 2 years. The photo below illustrates a ‘poor’ condition rating. Fair A ‘fair’ condition rating indicates light to moderate corrosion along with exposed aggregate. Twelve of the 57 manholes inspected received a rating of ‘fair’. ‘Fair’ manholes are recommended to be rehabilitated within 2 to 5 years. The photo below illustrates a ‘fair’ condition rating. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Evaluation - Preliminary Engineering Report January 4, 2017 Page 3 Good ‘Good’ condition includes the majority of the manhole to exhibit no to light corrosion with some moderate corrosion. Eighteen of the 57 manholes inspected received a rating of ‘good’. No rehabilitation is recommended for ‘good’ manholes. These manholes should be inspected regularly to assess any change in condition. The photo below illustrates a ‘good’ condition rating. Very Good ‘Very good’ condition ratings include very light to light corrosion. Fifteen of the 57 manholes inspected received a rating of ‘very good’. No rehabilitation is recommended for ‘very good’ manholes. These manholes should be inspected regularly to assess any change in condition. The photo below illustrates a ‘very good’ condition rating. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Evaluation - Preliminary Engineering Report January 4, 2017 Page 4 Excellent An ‘excellent’ condition rating indicates no to very light corrosion. Nine of the 57 manholes inspected received a rating of ‘excellent’. No rehabilitation is recommended for ‘excellent’ manholes. These manholes should be inspected regularly to assess any change in condition. The photo below illustrates an ‘excellent’ condition rating. The condition ratings for each manhole can be seen below in Table 1: Sanitary Sewer Manhole Evaluation - Preliminary Engineering Report January 4, 2017 Page 5 Table 1 – Manhole Evaluation Results ağƓŷƚƌĻ.ǒźƌķ/ƚƓķźƷźƚƓwğƷźƓŭtŷğƭĻЊ ağƓŷƚƌĻL5 ĻƩǤtƚƚƩtƚƚƩCğźƩDƚƚķĻƩǤDƚƚķ9ǣĭĻƌƌĻƓƷ IĻźŭŷƷΝŅƷΞwĻƦğźƩΝŅƷΞ ED28121.3X ED28218.7X18.7 ED28319.2X19.2 ED283A16.9X ED28716.2X ED28817.3X ED28917.7X ED30210.7X ED303**0.0X ED3049.0X ED30612.2X12.2 ID11121.8X21.8 ID11221.3X ID11321.3X ID11423.3X ID11524.4X ID11622.4X ID319.0X9.0 ID3213.6X ID3311.9X ID3412.9X ID3511.3X ID9023.8X23.8 ID9121.2X21.2 ID9223.6X23.6 ID9322.3X22.3 ID9421.4X ID9520.4X ID9620.7X ID9721.3X MC574431.3X MC5747A22.6X22.6 MC5749A**0.0X MC577425.0X25.0 SS34617.8X SS38413.7X SS39112.8X SS483a13.2X SS49719.1X SS53113.0X SS54914.8X SS5509.0X SS56510.3X SS56622.8X22.8 SS56722.4X SS56820.9X SS56921.3X SS57616.7X SS57717.4X SS57815.2X SS72515.8X SS73725.7X25.7 SS768*25.0X VP17715.6X15.6 VP17813.8X13.8 VP17912.8X VP18013.0X ƚƷğƌƭВБА͵АЉЌЊЋЊБЊЎВЋВЏ͵В *ManholenumbershowninFigures14doesnotmatchthatshownondrawingspreviouslysuppliedbytheCity. **Manholewasnotaccessiblewiththecamera,howeveravisualinspectionwasperformedinthefield. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Evaluation - Preliminary Engineering Report January 4, 2017 Page 6 Alternatives for Rehabilitation Five rehabilitation methods are being considered for rehabilitation of the manholes. The alternatives include Geopolymer Lining, Polyurethane Coating, Three-Layer Polyuria System, Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic (FRP) Insert and Geopolymer with Epoxy Lining System. See the below discussion for descriptions of each alternative. Geopolymer Lining A geoplymer repair lining provides corrosion resistance, structural integrity and infiltration resistance. The geopolymer consists of fiber reinforced, cementitious like material made from pozzolanic materials and monocrystalline quartz aggregate. A one-half to three-inch application using pressure spraying or spinning is recommended. A two coat application of a curing compound may be required based on humidity in the structure. The initial cure time is approximately an hour and the final cure time may take up to two hours. Polyurethane Coating A solvent free, 100% solids polyurethane coating provides corrosion resistance, elongation, flexibility, high build potential, high impermeability and a rapid application. Low permeability protects sewage systems from HS gas 2 and metal surfaces from corrosive atmospheres. It can be sprayed in one surface application, be immersed immediately, cures in 7 days, and does not require any heating, baking or follow-up treatment. Three-Layer Polyuria System This three-layer system includes a primer with silicone modified polyuria, a second layer made of closed cell polyurethane foam and a final layer for corrosion made of silicone modified polyuria. The three layers seal, protect and resurface manholes. An impervious barrier is created that protects against groundwater intrusion, rapid temperature changes, leaking and other wastewater structural damage. FRP Insert A FRP insert is a one piece precast piece that can be dropped into an existing manhole and will act as a freestanding manhole. The existing casting and cone are removed and replaced using this rehabilitation method and grout is placed in between the existing manhole and the insert. The insert provides both structural and corrosion resistance. The bench configuration of the manhole can be a part of the insert as one piece, can have coatings applied or have fiberglass laminated to it. Installation of the insert typically takes 3 days per manhole. Geopolymer with Epoxy Lining System The Geopolymer with Epoxy Lining consists of the above Geopolymer Lining used in combination with an Epoxy Lining. When the combination is spray-applied to at least a half-inch thickness, it is a monothlitic liner with compressive and flexural strengths that exceed the original structure. The benefit of combining the Geopolymer Lining with Epoxy Lining is increased corrosion resistance. Table 2 – Summary of Rehabilitation Alternatives Approximate Bypass ApproximateStructural? Excavation cost \[$/foot\]* Required? time to rehab Required? Geopolymer Lining $380 No 6-8 hours Yes No Polyurethane Coating $430 Yes 6-8 hours No No Three-Layer Polyuria $360 Yes 6-8 hours Yes No System FRP Insert $1,500 Case 3 days Yes Yes Dependent Geopolymer with $620 Yes 1.5 days Yes No Epoxy Lining System *Assuming a 4-foot diameter manhole Sanitary Sewer Manhole Evaluation - Preliminary Engineering Report January 4, 2017 Page 7 Recommendations Rehabilitation is recommended during the 2017 construction season for all manholes having a condition rating of ‘very poor’, ‘poor’, and ‘fair’. Use of the FRP Insert and Geopolymer with Epoxy Lining are discouraged, because they are cost prohibitive. We recommend allowing contractors to select the rehabilitation product / method, from the following: Geopolymer Lining, Polyurethane Coating, or Three-Layer Polyuria System. By allowing all three products / methods, the City will realize greater competition in pricing, for different products that provide similar rehabilitation benefits. Re-inspection is recommended every 2 years for manholes noted to have ‘good’, ‘very good’, and ‘excellent’ condition ratings. Rehabilitation of select manholes may impact the deterioration rates of other manholes in close proximity, due to MIC migration. Additionally, the City should work in coordination with MCES in an effort to ensure that chemical addition impacting the City’s collection system is performed and monitored for effectiveness. p:\\pt\\s\\shako\\139429\\4-prelim-dsgn-rpts\\memo\\manhole rehabilitation memo.docx SS384 SS391 SS565 SS550 SS549 SS531SS497 Legend SS566 Project Boundary City Manholes SS567 City Sanitary Sewer SS568 Inspected City Manholes SS576 Excellent - (9) Very Good - (15) SS569 SS577 Good - (18) Fair - (12) SS578 Poor - (3) Very Poor - (0) MCES Interceptors Interceptor (Gravity main) Interceptor (Forcemain) Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Project: SHAKO 139429 Sanitary Sewer Manhole Inspection and Evaluation I Figure 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. Print Date: 12/28/2016 ST. PAUL, MN 55110 PHONE: (651) 490-2000 City of Shakopee Map by: ELS FAX: (888) 908-8166 1 0250500Feet Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N TF: (800) 325-2055 Source: City of Shakopee www.sehinc.com This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey map and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information, and data gathered from various sources listed on this map and is to be used for reference purposes only. SEH does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and SEH does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking, or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The user of this map acknowledges that SEH shall not be liable for any damages which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. Legend Project Boundary City Manholes ED287 City Sanitary Sewer E Inspected City Manholes Excellent - (9) Very Good - (15) Good - (18) Fair - (12) Poor - (3) Very Poor - (0) MCES Interceptors MC5744 Interceptor (Gravity main) Interceptor (Forcemain) SS483A SS346 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Project: SHAKO 139429 Sanitary Sewer Manhole Inspection and Evaluation I Figure 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. Print Date: 12/28/2016 ST. PAUL, MN 55110 PHONE: (651) 490-2000 City of Shakopee Map by: ELS FAX: (888) 908-8166 2 0250500Feet Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N TF: (800) 325-2055 Source: City of Shakopee www.sehinc.com This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey map and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information, and data gathered from various sources listed on this map and is to be used for reference purposes only. SEH does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and SEH does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking, or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The user of this map acknowledges that SEH shall not be liable for any damages which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. ED289 ID114 VP178 ED288 VP177 ED283A ID116 ID115 ED287ED282 VP179 VP180 ED283 ED281 MC5747A Legend ED304 ED306 Project Boundary ED303 City Manholes MC5749A ED302 SS725 City Sanitary Sewer Inspected City Manholes Excellent - (9) MC5744 Very Good - (15) Good - (18) Fair - (12) Poor - (3) Very Poor - (0) MCES Interceptors Interceptor (Gravity main) Interceptor (Forcemain) Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Project: SHAKO 139429 Sanitary Sewer Manhole Inspection and Evaluation I Figure 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. Print Date: 12/28/2016 ST. PAUL, MN 55110 PHONE: (651) 490-2000 City of Shakopee Map by: ELS FAX: (888) 908-8166 3 0250500Feet Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N TF: (800) 325-2055 Source: City of Shakopee www.sehinc.com This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey map and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information, and data gathered from various sources listed on this map and is to be used for reference purposes only. SEH does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and SEH does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking, or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The user of this map acknowledges that SEH shall not be liable for any damages which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. Legend Project Boundary City Manholes City Sanitary Sewer Inspected City Manholes Excellent - (9) Very Good - (15) Good - (18) Fair - (12) ID97 Poor - (3) Very Poor - (0) ID96 ID95 MCES Interceptors ID31 ID32 Interceptor (Gravity main)ID33 ID34 ID94 ID35 Interceptor (Forcemain) SS737 MC5774 ID93 ID91 ID92 ID90 ID111 SS768 ID112 ID113 ID114 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getm Project: SHAKO 139429 Sanitary Sewer Manhole Inspection and Evaluation Figure 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. Print Date: 12/28/2016 ST. PAUL, MN 55110 PHONE: (651) 490-2000 City of Shakopee Map by: ELS FAX: (888) 908-8166 4 0250500Feet Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N TF: (800) 325-2055 Source: City of Shakopee www.sehinc.com This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey map and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information, and data gathered from various sources listed on this map and is to be used for reference purposes only. SEH does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and SEH does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking, or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The user of this map acknowledges that SEH shall not be liable for any damages which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. February 1, 2017 RE: City of Shakopee 2017 Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation Preliminary Cost Estimate SEH No. SHAKO 139429 14.00 Bruce Loney, PE Public Works Director City of Shakopee 129 Holmes St. S. Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Bruce: On January 3, 2017 SEH sent the Preliminary Engineering Report Memorandum (Memo) to the City of Shakopee, which contains the inspection results from Phase 1, and our analysis and recommendations for Phase 2 of the referenced project. In response to recent discussions with your staff regarding our recommendations, we are sending you the Preliminary Cost Estimate for the rehabilitation of the 13 manholes that have been selected for rehabilitation in 2017. The total build height for the 13 manholes is about 250 feet. Please recall from our Memo that we recommend allowing contractors to quote any one of the three recommended rehabilitation methods. The estimated pricing for each of the recommended rehabilitation methods is as follows: Rehabilitation Method Approximate cost \[$/foot\]* Geopolymer Lining $380 Polyurethane Coating $430 Three-Layer Polyuria System $360 *Assuming a 4-foot diameter manhole Applying the median cost of $380/foot for the 13 manholes results in an estimated total construction cost of $95,000. Procurement using competitive quotes is recommended because we anticipate project costs being less than $100,000. Please contact me with questions or comments at mostendorf@sehinc.com or 651.280.0679. Sincerely, Michael H. Ostendorf, PE Project Manager p:\\pt\\s\\shako\\139429\\4-prelim-dsgn-rpts\\preliminary cost estimate\\20170201 preliminary cost estimate letter.docx Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 SEH is 100% employee-owned | sehinc.com | 952.912.2600 | 800.734.6757 | 888.908.8166 fax !"#$%&'(& )* -+).%/,,31<0; !" #$ %&'=,/%$3>,)' 01234%56,!3-$,,$3-%$+13?31<0@3A)$)3B &)53C-+),"3C3)&"377DEE ()!,' -+).%/,,7899:;2 ,&& F,3G)HH)"C291E31::?2:01G)HH)"I-+).%/,,78JK%L (%&$)#$'*+%&,'M?7) 5' N+,3!$)$ !$ #)53)&)5O! !P3!)5)O3)&K,3)&"3,Q#,/$ %&)53!,L #,3/)O3$,!$3,!5$!3),3!+%R&3H,5%RJ33*)$3S3 !3K,&,)53 &F%6)$ %&3 F%63O%3/)O3,T $O3,/%$3")$)J33*)$!3SSP3SSS3)&"3SU3K L,3O%3$+,3$,!$3,!5$!J B%36%,3",$) 53%&3,)#+3$,!$P3,F,3$%3$+,3G ",3$%3*)O3MT $O3(%6/5 )&#,3)&"3(%6/$,3=,/%$!J +,'-./.(01'234'1055'+/63(708+3/ 7#!&'6&#!&'4#!#$%&:'0!!'2;' !#99&9!#99&9!#99&9!#99&9 3:^31:3_3@9 V3%H3(5)!!,! 30<93:_31130@0 V3M6/5%O,,! WLKJ37)Q37%&$+5O3 3@P0;;J9<339P@91J@9339P209J:<3 *)O3/,3,6/5%O,, ++,'5808+58+01'0/01<5+5'8.58 'IJ,KJ 0,''''=$:&) #>&$*'(#*"'?'@ 7#!&'6&#!&' !#99&9!#99&9 31@30_ )J3V3W$3%3)H%L,3*," #$,"3*)O 30132 HJ3V3D,5%R3*," #$,"3*)O 3:^31: #J3NXNWY 3:0J9^3:2J0: "J3Z3D,5%R3*," #$,"3*)O3 CH3" L ","3HO3#3\[3"E \\C=,!5$3 !3Z3%F36)5,3#5)!!,!3H,5%R3/," #$,"3/)O3" L ","3HO3Z3%F3F,6)5,3#5)!!,!3H,5%R3/," #$,"3/)OJE 4,'''8A*&9*'(&9B!*9 30:;?:J:<2 A,K,,!3%F3B,,"%63CABE3\[3U)5,3%F3N3\[3 `_:3 )J3WLKJ3" FFJ3 &3/)O3F%63/," #$,"3/)O3F%36)5,3\]%H!3\[3 `1@23 HJ3WLKJ3" FFJ3 &3/)O3F%63/," #$,"3/)O3F%3F,6)5,3\]%H!3\[3 'LJM,LL +++,'5010(<'(0/-.'8.58'?'C(&9B!*'"9'0':"D":&:';>'4E 39J<: WJ3333WLKJ3V3%F3O,)!3$%36)Q3!)5)O3F%36)5,3\]%H!3\[3 DJ3333WLKJ3V3%F3O,)!3$%36)Q3!)5)O3F%3F,6)5,3\]%H!3\[33_J;_ 'J,JJ +F,''''.G.H8+3/01'5.(F+.'H0<'8.58'?'C(&9B!*'"9'4':"D":&:';>'0E 3<J<< WJ3333Z3%F36)5,3#5)!!,!3,#, L &K3M-*\\ 3<J<< DJ3333Z3%F3F,6)5,3#5)!!,!3,#, L &K3M-* \\CSF31<Z3%35,!!P3$,!$3,!5$3R 553H,3<J<<E -.#/01++ !23 #$%&& 9%)% 81)". :*"(5(7%)(1 ;(&)456", !"#$#!%&'#( )#*+, #$%&& !" !" #$%&& & +(1 + +%3 + 4"& ) +%3 4"& 5 837*/)(1%$ !"'()$*+%$*&,*-%$*&'./*0(1)&2%$%".2%$%".2%$%".2*"6(7*2*"6(7* 0%. !78-+9:&;+!"+*/!<$$+'=#'$!2!2>!8?@883A!?@37 A!!2A!A !)B*$0=&#'!!C!87?@DEEA!?3@EA!!2A!A !7E>B&(=&'F!-B1+9:&*09!!>!D?@ A!?@7EA!!2A!A !7D<9+'#!-B1+9:&*09!8!C!D?@D2A!?@2 A!!2A!A !G+;+1$&0'&*$!H!)&$I!J#((!!%!?@DE8A!?3@E3A!!2A!A ! G+;+1$&0'&*$!H!K0(&;+!!%!7?@DE8A!?3@E3A!!2A!A !2%#;&(&$&+*!C#&'$+'#';+!L09/+9!!C!?3@E A!?2@D7A!!2A!A !EK0(&;+!G+;09=*!M+;.'&;&#'!!3%!?3@ 2A!?2@77A!!2A!A !7NOO&;+!<**&*$#'$!H!%&9+!"+1$!!%!7?3@ 2A!?2@77A!!2A!A !3)0PPB'&$I!-+9:&;+!NOO&;+9!!C!2?3@ 2A!?2@77A!!2A!A !D<;;0B'$&'F!)(+9/!!%!7?3@D 2A!?2@D77A!!2A!A !3<=P&'&*$9#$&:+!<**&*$#'$!!D%!77?3@D 2A!?2@D77A!!2A!A !8C#&'$+'#';+!N1+9#$09! !C! ?3@8 8A!?2@837A!!2A!A !7K0(&;+!Q:&=+';+!M+;.'&;&#'!!%! 7?3@D 2A!?2@D77A!!2A!A !77K0(&;+!G+;09=*!-1+;&#(&*$!!%!E?3@ 2 A!?2@778A!!2A!A !4+#=!C#&'$+'#';+!N1+9#$09!!C!D?7@D2A!?7@D2A!!A!A ! M+;.'0(0FI!-B1109$!<**&*$#'$!!%!D7?2@3 A!?7@27A!!7A!A !2Q'F&'++9&'F!M+;.'&;&#'!!C!D7?2@8D8A!? @A!!7A!A ! >B&(=&'F!C#&'$+'#';+!C#'#F+9!!C!?2@3 A!?7@27A!!7A!A !73)9&P+!K9+:+'$&0'!-1+;&#(&*$!!%!7?2@3 A!?7@27A!!7A!A ! C+;.#'&;!!C!7?2@3A!?7@72A!!2A!A !7R&;$&P!#'=!)0PPB'&$I!-+9:&;+!)!!%!?2@3 A!?7@27A!!7A!A !JBP#'!G+*0B9;+*!-1+;&#(&*$!!%!?2@8D8A!? @A!!7A!A !56-!-1+;&#(&*$!!C!?2@8D8A!? @A!!7A!A !4+#=!C+;.#'&;!!C!7?7@ 3A!?7@ 3A!!A!A !7%09+P#'!!C!7?2@8D8A!? @A!!7A!A !259#'$*!#'=!-1+;&#(!K90S+;$*!!%!3?2@8D8A!? @A!!7A!A !3K(#''+9!!C!2?2@8D8A!? @A!!7A!A !7K#I90((!T!>+'+O&$*!-1+;&#(&*$!!%!2?2@8D8A!? @A!!7A!A !28U#$B9#(!G+*0B9;+*!M+;.'&;&#'!!C!27?2@8D8A!? @A!!7A!A !72%&9+O&F.$+9!2!C!77?2@8D8A!? @A!!7A!A !K90S+;$!)009=&'#$09!!C! ?7@EA!?E@3A!!7A!A !D)0PPB'&;#$&0'*!)009=&'#$09!!%! ?7@87A!? @ A!!7A!A !86M!-1+;&#(&*$!!C!E?2@8D8A!? @A!!7A!A !8>B&(=&'F!6'*1+;$09!!C!E7?7@87A!? @ A!!7A!A !3K0(&;+!NOO&;+9!D! C!8?2@83A!? @27A!!2A!A ! C#&'$+'#';+!-B1+9:&*09!H!KL!!C!83?7@87A!? @ A!!7A!A !7 -9!KBV(&;!L09/*!M+;.'&;&#'!!C!D7?7@87A!? @ A!!7A!A ! -+'&09!Q'F&'++9&'F!M+;.'&;&#'!!C!3?7@87A!? @ A!!7A!A !E%&9+!6'*1+;$09!!C!38?7@87A!? @ A!!7A!A !DC#&'$+'#';+!-B1+9:&*09!H!%#;&(!!C!38?7@87A!? @ A!!7A!A ! 7K+9P&$!)009=&'#$09!!%!38?7@87A!? @ A!!7A!A !37K90S+;$!Q'F&'++9!!C!37?7@EA!?E@3A!!7A!A !33-+'&09!K(#''+9!!C!32?7@7A!? @7 A!!7A!A !K0(&;+!G+;09=*!-B1+9:&*09!!%!323?7@87A!? @ A!!7A!A !3G+;9+#$&0'!-B1+9:&*09!3!>!37?7@87A!? @ A!!7A!A !E)&$I!)(+9/!!%!2?7@EA!?E@3A!!7A!A !3 >B&(=&'F!NOO&;&#(!!C!23? @7E2A!?8@EA!!7A!A !2D<;;0B'$&'F!C#'#F+9!!%!23?7@EA!?E@3A!!7A!A !38KBV(&;!L09/*!-B1+9&'$+'=+'$!!C!23? @7E2A!?8@EA!!7A!A !36M!)009=&'#$09!!%!233?7@EA!?E@3A!!7A!A !7Q;0'!"+:!)009=&'#$09!!%!27? @7E2A!?8@EA!!7A!A !32K0(&;+!-+9F+#'$!7!>!28?E@A!?E@E88A!!A!A !3D<**&*$#'$!)&$I!Q'F&'++9!!C!28? @7E2A!?8@EA!!7A!A !2K0(&;+!)#1$#&'!!C!777?E@7D3A!?D@2DA!! A!A ! 3JBP*'!G+*0B9;+*!C#'#F+9!!%!787?E@7D3A!?D@2DA!! A!A ! 26M!"&9+;$09!!C!7D7?E@7D3A!?D@2DA!! A!A !2K#9/*!#'=!G+;9+#$&0'!"&9+;$09!!%! 7?8@2A!?@3A!! A!A -.#/01++ !23 #$%&& 9%)% 81)". :*"(5(7%)(1 ;(&)456", !"#$#!%&'#( )#*+, #$%&& !" !" #$%&& & +(1 + +%3 + 4"& ) +%3 4"& 5 837*/)(1%$ !"'()$*+%$*&,*-%$*&'./*0(1)&2%$%".2%$%".2%$%".2*"6(7*2*"6(7* 0%. !2E%&9+!).&+O!!C! 2?8@2A!?@3A!! A!A !22KL!"&9+;$09!)&$I!Q'F&'++9!!C! 87?8@2A!?@3A!! A!A !2%&'#';+!"&9+;$09!!C!E7?8@DE A!?@A!! A!A !23K(#''&'F!#'=!"+:+(01P+'$!"&9+;!!C!E7?8@DE A!?@A!! A!A !3E<**&*$#'$!)&$I!<=P&'&*$9#$09!!C!E?8@DE A!?@A!! A!A !27).&+O!0O!K0(&;+!!C!EE?8@DE A!?@A!! A!A !2 )&$I!<=P&'&*$9#$09!!C!87?@3EEA!?@3EEA!!A!A ! 7 W0V!UBPV+9!)0B'$, //0 )*#+,-.. #$ %&'( %!#)!* +,$(!-,$!!!! !"#$#!%&'#( !"!!!! 2 4 2 123 045 >,&'$9 6#(.!7,89%.:#(.!7,89;#(#'<.=!7,89>?.=&<$.=!>#@ A&'.!B,'$&'C#$&,'!D6&'EA&'.!B,'$&'C#$&,'!D6#FE >#G.!!,H!1 //0 )*#+,-.. #$ %&'( %!#)!* +,$(!-,$!!!! !"#$#!%&'#( !"!!!! .,/!.,/!1&(2 0/$!0/$!1,(2!.,/!.,/!45!4,!#$ %&'( %!#)! 0/$42 8 92 0/$1)+ #,&3(62$)#)7&-- $ 3' !34).?I&<.!".9+!J$$.'=#'$!2!2!4;#(#'<.=!4KL13 M!KL 0M12!DK13M12E !BC9$,=&#'!!!6#(.!43K1L0M!KL05M55!K54M! !30;C&(=&'G!)C-.?I&9,?!!!;#(#'<.=!5KL30M!KL53M35!DK122M35E !35J?.'#!)C-.?I&9,?!4!!46#(.!5KL2 M!KL53M35!DK245M35E !N.<.-$&,'&9$!O!B&$@!P#((!!!%.:#(.!K1L01M!K1L M00!K3 M1! ! N.<.-$&,'&9$!O!>,(&<.!!!%.:#(.!3K1L01M!K1L41M1 !K215M 2! !2%#<&(&$&.9!6#&'$.'#'<.!Q,?+.?!!!6#(.!K2L53M!K1L23M53!K 45M3! !0>,(&<.!N.<,?=9!R.<*'&<&#'!!1!1%.:#(.!K2L33M!K1L23M53!KL55M3! !3SHH&<.!J99&9$#'$!O!%&?.!".-$!!!%.:#(.!3K2L33M!K1L34M33!K50 M23! !1B,::C'&$@!).?I&<.!SHH&<.?!!!6#(.!2K2L33M!K2L2M30!K1 2M21! !5J<<,C'$&'G!B(.?+!!!%.:#(.!3K2L533M!K2L143M03!K3 5M3! !1J=:&'&9$?#$&I.!J99&9$#'$!!5!5%.:#(.!33K2L533M!K2L34M12!K22 M ! !46#&'$.'#'<.!S-.?#$,?! !! 6#(.! K2L413M!K2L 5M55!K3M! !3>,(&<.!TI&=.'<.!R.<*'&<&#'!!!%.:#(.! 3K2L533M!K2L00M5!K10M! !33>,(&<.!N.<,?=9!)-.<&#(&9$!!!%.:#(.!0K2L334M!K3L1M4 !DK223M4 E !A.#=!6#&'$.'#'<.!S-.?#$,?!!!6#(.!5K3L52M!K3L1M05!DK M05E ! R.<*',(,G@!)C--,?$!J99&9$#'$!!!%.:#(.!53K3L23M!K3L1 M31!K41M20! !2T'G&'..?&'G!R.<*'&<&#'!!!6#(.!53K LM!K3L1 M31!K033M20! ! ;C&(=&'G!6#&'$.'#'<.!6#'#G.?!!!6#(.!K3L23M!K3L22M !K0M14! !31B?&:.!>?.I.'$&,'!)-.<&#(&9$!!!%.:#(.!3K3L23M!K3L2 5M0!DK5M0E ! 6.<*#'&<!!!6#(.!3K3L32M!K3L M !DK224M E !3U&<$&:!#'=!B,::C'&$@!).?I&<.!B!!!%.:#(.!K3L23M!K3L 0M3!DKM3E !PC:#'!N.9,C?<.9!)-.<&#(&9$!!!%.:#(.!K LM!K3L 0M3!K23M25! !VW)!)-.<&#(&9$!!!6#(.!K LM!K3L 0M3!K23M25! !A.#=!6.<*#'&<!!!6#(.!3K3L 1M!K3L012M5!DKM5E !3%,?.:#'!!!6#(.!3K LM!K3L012M5!K140M! !2V?#'$9!#'=!)-.<&#(!>?,X.<$9!!!%.:#(.!1K LM!K3L055M51!K1M0! !1>(#''.?!!!6#(.!2K LM!K LM3!KM53! !3>#@?,((!Y!;.'.H&$9!)-.<&#(&9$!!!%.:#(.!2K LM!K LM3!KM53! !24Z#$C?#(!N.9,C?<.9!R.<*'&<&#'!!!6#(.!23K LM!K L 2M !K30M15! !32%&?.H&G*$.?!2!!26#(.!33K LM!K L M2!DK22M2E !>?,X.<$!B,,?=&'#$,?!!!6#(.! K0L1M!K L4M5 !K5M2! !5B,::C'&<#$&,'9!B,,?=&'#$,?!!!%.:#(.! K L M!K L4M5 !K140M2! !4WR!)-.<&#(&9$!!!6#(.!0K LM!K L12M31!DK5M31E !4;C&(=&'G!W'9-.<$,?!!!6#(.!03K L M!K L13M22!K32M3 ! >#G.!!,H!1 //0 )*#+,-.. #$ %&'( %!#)!* +,$(!-,$!!!! !"#$#!%&'#( !"!!!! .,/!.,/!1&(2 0/$!0/$!1,(2!.,/!.,/!45!4,!#$ %&'( %!#)! 0/$42 8 92 0/$1)+ #,&3(62$)#)7&-- $ 3' !1>,(&<.!SHH&<.?!5! !136#(.!4K L23M!K L2M2 !K2M32! ! 6#&'$.'#'<.!)C-.?I&9,?!O!>Q!!!6#(.!41K L M!K L24M !K00M52! !3 )?!>C8(&<!Q,?+9!R.<*'&<&#'!!!6#(.!53K L M!K L3M23!K51M33! ! ).'&,?!T'G&'..?&'G!R.<*'&<&#'!!!6#(.!1K L M!K L324M!K30M44! !0%&?.!W'9-.<$,?!!!6#(.!14K L M!K L342M !KM02! !56#&'$.'#'<.!)C-.?I&9,?!O!%#<&(!!!6#(.!14K L M!K L 14M 1!DK1M 1E ! 3>.?:&$!B,,?=&'#$,?!!!%.:#(.!14K L M!K L 14M 1!DK1M 1E !13>?,X.<$!T'G&'..?!!!6#(.!13K0L1M!K L 0M2!K2 M34! !11).'&,?!>(#''.?!!!6#(.!12K L3 M!K0L1M25!DK32M25E !>,(&<.!N.<,?=9!)C-.?I&9,?!!!%.:#(.!121K L M!K0L M44!DK233M44E !1N.<?.#$&,'!)C-.?I&9,?!1!!3;#(#'<.=!13K L M!K0L0M4!DK3M4E !0B&$@!B(.?+!!!%.:#(.!2K0L1M!K0L 4M1!DK250M1E !1 ;C&(=&'G!SHH&<&#(!!!6#(.!21K4L0M!K0L00M0!K222M01! !25J<<,C'$&'G!6#'#G.?!!!%.:#(.!21K0L1M!K0L00M0!DK 2M0E !14>C8(&<!Q,?+9!)C-.?&'$.'=.'$!!!6#(.!21K4L0M!K4L1M !K4 M02! !1WR!B,,?=&'#$,?!!!%.:#(.!211K0L1M!K4L M50!DK51M50E !3T<,'!".I!B,,?=&'#$,?!!!%.:#(.!23K4L0M!K4L0M0!K2 M41! !12>,(&<.!).?G.#'$!3!!0;#(#'<.=!24K0L044M!K4L3M04!DK01M04E !15J99&9$#'$!B&$@!T'G&'..?!!!6#(.!24K4L0M!K4L3M04!DK52M04E !2>,(&<.!B#-$#&'!!!6#(.!333K5L25M!K5L154M53!K51M3! ! 1PC:9'!N.9,C?<.9!6#'#G.?!!!%.:#(.!343K5L25M!K5L 2M1!DKM1E ! 2WR!"&?.<$,?!!!6#(.!353K5L25M!K5L01M24!DK2M24E !2>#?+9!#'=!N.<?.#$&,'!"&?.<$,?!!!%.:#(.! 3KL1M!K5L43M 3!K23M13! !20%&?.!B*&.H!!!6#(.! 2KL1M!KL32M!K20M4! !22>Q!"&?.<$,?!B&$@!T'G&'..?!!!6#(.! 43KL1M!KL 5 M50!DK152M50E !2%&'#'<.!"&?.<$,?!!!6#(.!03KLM!KL5M3!K10M3! !21>(#''&'G!#'=!".I.(,-:.'$!"&?.<!!!6#(.!03KLM!KL5M3!K10M3! !10J99&9$#'$!B&$@!J=:&'&9$?#$,?!!!6#(.!0KLM!KL3M3!K 0M53! !23B*&.H!,H!>,(&<.!!!6#(.!00KLM!KL33M !DK11M E !2 B&$@!J=:&'&9$?#$,?!!!6#(.!43KL100M!KL12 M55!K1M! ! 3 7,8!ZC:8.?!B,C'$\[! >#G.!1!,H!1 Proposal #®¬¯¤² ³¨® 0±®¦± ¬ 2¤µ¨¤¶ For #¨³¸ ®¥ ShakopeeǾ -¨¤²®³ 12/20/2016 0±¤¯ ±¤£ ¡¸Ȁ +¤¸²³®¤ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® '±®´¯ LLC ΒΒΐΕ %²¨¦ !µ¤ . -¨¤ ¯®«¨² -. ΔΔΓΑΖ 4¤«¤¯§®¤Ȁ 612-810-3522 E-Mail: Sabboud@keystonecomp.net 7¤¡Ȁ www.keystonecomp.net $¤¢¤¬¡¤± ΑΏǾ ΑΏΐΕ Compensation Program Review for Shakopee Table of Contents Topic 0 ¦¤ Ͱ " ¢ª¦±®´£ £ /¡©¤¢³¨µ¤² ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 0±®©¤¢³ 3´¬¬ ±¸ £ $¤«¨µ¤± ¡«¤² ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 &± ¬¤¶®±ª ¥®± #®£´¢³¨¦ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® 0±®¦± ¬ 2¤µ¨¤¶ -------------------------------------- 4 3³¤¯² ¥®± #®¬¯«¤³¨¦ 4§¨² 3³´£¸ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 0±®©¤¢³ 4¤ ¬ £ 2¤« ³¤£ %·¯¤±¨¤¢¤ ------------------------------------------------------------------ 8 %²³¨¬ ³¤£ &¨ ¢¨ « "´£¦¤³ £ 0±¤«¨¬¨ ±¸ 4¨¬¤«¨¤ ---------------------------------------------- 9 0±®¯®² « !¯¯±®µ « ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10 "¨®¦± ¯§¨¤² ®¥ 0±®©¤¢³ 4¤ ¬ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 11 +¤¸²³®¤ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® '±®´¯ ,,# 0 ¦¤ 2 $¤¢¤¬¡¤± ΑΏǾ ΑΏΐΕ Compensation Program Review for Shakopee " ¢ª¦±®´£ £ Objectives #¨³¸ ®¥ Shakopee (C¨³¸ȩ request¤£ ¯±®¯®² « ¥±®¬ +¤¸²³®¤ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® '±®´¯ ,,# ¥®± ¯±®µ¨£¨¦ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ¢®²´«³¨¦ ²¤±µ¨¢¤²ȁ 4§¤²¤ ²¤±µ¨¢¤² ¨¢«´£¤ ¤µ «´ ³¨¦ City jobs, ¢®£´¢³¨¦ ¢®¬¯¤³¨³¨µ¤ ¬ ±ª¤³ analysis, £ ¯±¤¯ ±¨¦ ±¤¢®¬¬¤£ ³¨®² ¥®± ´¯£ ³¨¦ ³§¤ #i² « ±¸ ± ¦¤²ȁ 4§¤ Ci³¸ § ² ¡®´³ 150 full-³¨¬¤ £ ¯ ±³-³¨¬¤ ¤¬¯«®¸¤¤² ¨ ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ 60 ©®¡ ¢« ²²¨¥¨¢ ³¨®²ȁ !¡®´³ ΔΑ ®¥ ³§¤²¤ ©®¡² ±¤ non-´¨® ¢« ²²¨¥¨¢ ³¨®² £ ³§¤²¤ ±¤ ³§¤ ¯±¨¬ ±¸ ¥®¢´² ®¥ ³§¨² ²³´£¸ȁ 2¤¬ ¨¨¦ ©®¡² ¨¢«´£¤£ ¨ ³§¨² ²³´£¸ ¶®´«£ ¡¤ £¤¢¨£¤£ duri¦ ³§¤ ¯±®©¤¢³ ¨¨³¨ « ¬¤¤³¨¦ȁ 4§¤ #¨³¸ ´²¤² ²³¤¯ ¯ ¸ ¯±®¦± ¬ ¶¨³§ µ ±¸¨¦ ´¬¡¤± ®¥ ²³¤¯²Ǿ ± ¦¤² ²¯±¤ £Ǿ £ ¸¤ ±² ³® ¬ ·¨¬´¬ȁ .® £®¢´¬¤³ ³¨® ¨² µ ¨« ¡«¤ ® ³§¤ ¢´±±¤³ ©®¡ ¤µ «´ ³¨® ²¸²³¤¬ȁ 4§¤ ¢´±±¤³ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬ ¶ ² ±¤µ¨¤¶¤£ ¨ ΑΏΐΒȁ 4§¨² ¯±®¯®² « ®´³«¨¤² ®´± ´£¤±²³ £¨¦ ®¥ ³§¤ ²¢®¯¤ ®¥ ³§¨² study, ²³¤¯² ¶¤ ¶®´«£ ³ ª¤ ³® ¬¤¤³ its objectivesǾ ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤ ³¨¬¤«¨¤Ǿ £ ¤²³¨¬ ³¤ ®¥ ³§¤ ¥¨ ¢¨ « ¡´£¦¤³ ³® complete th¤ ¶®±ªȁ 0±®©¤¢³ 3´¬¬ ±¸ £ $¤«¨µ¤± ¡«¤² 1.#®£´¢³ meeting ¶¨³§ #¨³¸ «¤ £¤±²§¨¯ ³® ±¤µ¨¤¶ £ ¤µ «´ ³¤ ³§¤ ¢´±±¤³ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬ £ ¤·¯«®±¤ «³¤± ³¨µ¤²Ǿ £¨²¢´²² ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ²³± ³¤¦¸Ǿ £ ²¤³ ³§¤ ®µ¤± «« ¯« ¥®± ³§¤ ¯±®©¤¢³ȁ #®²´«³ ³ ¶®´«£ «²® ¢®¥¨±¬ ³§¤ ¯¤¤± ¦±®´¯ ®¥ ³¤ ¢¨³¨¤² ¢´±±¤³«¸ ¡¤¨¦ ´²¤£ ³® ¡¤¢§¬ ±ª #¨³¸ ©®¡². 2.%µ «´ ³¤ #¨³¸ ©®¡² ´²¨¦ ³§¤ +¤¸²³®¤ *®¡ ,¤µ¤«¨¦ 3¸²³¤¬ Ȩ¥ ¢³ ²§¤¤³ ¯±®µ¨£¤£). 3."¤¢§¬ ±ª #¨³¸ ©®¡² ´²¨¦ ³§¤ ,¤ ¦´¤ ®¥ -¨¤²®³ #¨³¨¤² Survey. 4.#®£´¢³ ¢®¬¯¤³¨³¨µ¤ ¬ ±ª¤³ «¸²e² £ ¢®¬¯ ±¨²®² ¥®± #¨³¸ jobs. 5.# «¨¡± ³¤ ³§¤ ¢´±±¤³ ¶ ¦¤ ²³±´¢³´±¤ £ «¨¦ ¨³ ¶¨³§ ³§¤ ¬ ±ª¤³ȁ 6.Perform ²³ ³¨²³¨¢ « «¸²¤² £ ¢±¤ ³¤ ²¢ ³³¤±¯«®³² ³® illustrate ³§¤ ±¤« ³¨®²§¨¯ ¡¤³¶¤¤ C¨³¸ ¯ ¸ levelǾ marketǾ £ ¯±®¦± ¬ ¨³¤± « ¤°´¨³¸. 7.0±¤¯ ±¤ ±¤¢®¬¬¤£ ³¨®² ¥®± ±¤µ¨²¨¦ ³§¤ ¢´±±¤³ ¶ ¦¤ ²³±´¢³´±¤ ¡ ²¤£ ® ¨³¤± « ©®¡ ¤µ «´ ³¨® ±¤²´«³² £ ¬ ±ª¤³ «¸²¨²ȁ 8.7®±ª ¶¨³§ #¨³¸ ²³ ¥¥ ³® ¯±¤¯ ±¤ ¢®²³ ¤²³¨¬ ³¤ ¥®± ³§¤ ¨¬¯ ¢³ ®¥ ³§¤ ±¤¢®¬¬¤£¤£ ¶ ¦¤ ²³±´¢³´±¤ ® ³®³ « ¯ ¸±®«« ¡´£¦¤³ £ ¨£¨µ¨£´ « ¤¬¯«®¸¤¤² pay. 9.0±¤¯ ±¤ su¬¬ ±¸ ³® ®´³«¨¤ ²³´£¸ processes £ «¸²¨² £ ³§¤¨± ¨¬¯«¨¢ ³¨®s ® #ity ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬ȁ 10.4§±®´¦§®´³ ³§¤ ¯±®©¤¢³ ¢±¤ ³¤ ®¯¯®±³´¨³¨¤² ¥®± #¨³¸ «¤ £¤±²§¨¯ ³® ¡¤ ¨µ®«µ¤£ ² £¤¤¬¤£ ¤¢¤²² ±¸ ¡¸ ³§¤ ¯±®©¤¢³ ³¤ ¬ȁ 4§¤ ¦® « ¨² ³® ¨¥®±¬ £ ¡´¨«£ ¢±¤£¨¡¨«¨³¸ ¨ ³§¤ ¯±®¦± ¬ ±¤µ¨¤¶ ¯±®¢¤²² £ ²³´£¸ ®´³¢®¬¤². +¤¸²³®¤ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® '±®´¯ ,,# 0 ¦¤ 3 Fr ¬¤¶®±ª ¥®± #®£´¢³¨¦ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® 0±®¦± ¬ 2¤µ¨¤¶ ¥®± 4§¤ #¨³¸ ®¥ Shakopee ,¤ £¤±²§¨¯ $¨²¢´²²¨® ®¥ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® #®««¤¢³ *®¡ $¤²¢±¨¯³¨®² %µ «´ ³¤ *®¡² 3³± ³¤¦¸ £ &´³´±¤ £ #¨³¸ %% $ ³ State "¤¢§¬ ±ª *®¡² ǉ 2¤µ¨¤¶ 3´±µ¤¸ $ ³ £ 3³ ³¨²³¨¢ « ! «¸²¨² ®¥ #®««¤¢³ - ±ª¤³ "´¨«£ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® - ±ª¤³ ǉ #¨³¸ $ ³ Data $ ³ ¡ ²¤ 0±¤¯ ±¤ 0 ¸ # «¨¡± ³¤ 7 ¦¤ $¤³¤±¬¨¤ &¨ ¢¨ « "´£¦¤³ )¬¯ ¢³ ®¥ .¤¶ #®¬¯ ±¨²®² £ 3³±´¢³´±¤ £ *®¡ Ranges #®¥¨±¬ )³¤± « %°´¨³¸ Levels 0±¤¯ ±¤ &¨ « $¤µ¤«®¯ 2¤µ¨¤¶ 2¤²´«³² 0±®©¤¢³ Recommendations ¶¨³§ #¨³¸ Summary 4 Ȟ Page Compensation Program Review $¤¢¤¬¡¤± ΑΏǾ ΑΏΐΕ 3³¤¯² ¥®± #®¬¯«¤³¨¦ 4§¨² 3³´£¸ 4§¤ «¤ £ ¢®²´«³ ³ typically starts ³§¤ ¯±®©¤¢³ with a initial planning ¬¤¤³¨¦ ¶¨³§ ³§¤ #¨³¸ 0±®©¤¢³ Team £ ®³§¤± stakeholders ² ¯¯±®¯±¨ ³¤ȁ 4§¤ ¯´±¯®²¤ ®¥ ³§¨² ¬¤¤³¨¦ ¶®´«£ ¡¤ ¥®± ³§¤ C¨³¸ ³¤ ¬ £ ³§¤ ¢®²´«³ ³ ³® ¤·¢§ ¦¤ ³§¤ ¤¢¤²² ±¸ ¨¥®±¬ ³¨® ±¤« ³¤£ ³® ³§¨² projectǾ £¨²¢´²² ³§¤ ®µ¤± «« ¯±®¢¤²²Ǿ £ ¯¯±®µ¤ ¯±®©¤¢³ timeline. +¤¸²³®¤ ¯±®¯®²¤² ³§¤ ¥®««®¶¨¦ ²³¤¯² for this study: 1.)¨³¨ « ¯lanning meeting ¶¨³§ «¤ £¤±²§¨¯ a.Review ¢´±±¤³ ¯ ¸ ¯± ¢³¨¢¤² £ ¢®¥¨±¬ £¤«¨µ¤± ¡«¤². 4§¨² ¨¢«´£¤² ¦ ³§¤±¨¦ ¢´±±¤³ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬ ¨¥®±¬ ³¨® £ ®´³«¨¤ ¨¬¯®±³ ³ ±¤ ² ³® ¡¤ ££±¤²²ed. b.$¨²¢´²² #ity¨¢«´£¤² £¨²¢´²²¨¦ ³§¤ ¬ ±ª¤³ ¥®± ³ «¤³ (¢´±±¤³ ¯¤¤± ¦±®´¯ cities)Ǿ ¶§¤±¤ ³§¤ #i³¸ would «¨ª¤ ³® ²³ ¢ª ¨³² ¯ ¸ ¯±®¦± ¬ ±¤« ³¨µ¤ ³® ³§¤ ¬ ±ª¤³Ǿ ¯±®¦± ¬ £¤²¨¦Ǿ £ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® administration guidelines. c.#®¥¨±¬ ¯ ¸ ²³±´¢³´±¤ £¤²¨¦ ³® «¨¦ ¶¨³§ ³§¤ ²³ ³¤£ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ²³± ³¤¦¸. d.$¨²¢´²² ¯±®¢¤²² ¥®± ¢®««¤¢³¨¦ ¬ ±ª¤³ £ ³ , City² ¨³¤± « £ ³ Ǿ £ ¯®³¤³¨ « ®³§¤± C¨³¸ ²³ ¥¥ ¨µ®«µ¤¬¤³ ¨ ¯±®¦± ¬ interview. 2.#®««¤¢³¨¦ £ c®¥¨±¬¨¦ ©®¡ £¤²¢±¨¯³¨®² a.) ®´± ¢ «« ¶¨³§ ³§¤ #¨³¸ (2 - ¦¤± £ ¡ ²¤£ ® ³§¤ ² ¬¯«¤ ®¥ ©®¡² ¶¤ reviewedǾ ©®¡ descriptio² ±¤ ¢´±±¤³«¸ ´¯-to-dateȁ 7¤ ¶®´«£ ¢®¥¨±¬ ³§ ³ ©®¡ £¤²¢±¨¯³¨®² ±¤ µ ¨« ¡«¤ ¥®± «« ©®¡² £ ¤¬¯«®¸¤¤² ¨¢«´£¤£ ¨ ³§¤ ²³´£¸. 3.%µ «´ ³¤ #ity ©®¡² ´²¨¦ ³§¤ +¤¸²³®¤ *®¡ ,¤µ¤«¨¦ 3¸²³¤¬ a.+¤¸²³®¤ *®¡ ,¤µ¤«¨¦ 3¸²³¤¬ ¶®´«£ ¡¤ ´²¤£ ³® ¤µ «´ ³¤ #¨³¸ ©®¡²ȁ ! ¥ ¢³²§¤¤³ ¡®´³ ³§¤ ²¸²³¤¬ ¨² ¯±®µ¨£¤£ ³® ¤·¯« ¨ ³§¤ ¢®¬¯¤² ¡«¤ ¥ ¢³®±² ´²¤£ ¨ ³§¤ ¤µ «´ ³¨®ȁ b.!² ¡ ¢ª¦±®´£Ǿ +¤¸²³®¤ #®²´«³ ³² § µ¤ ¤·³¤²¨µ¤ ¤·¯¤±¨¤¢¤ ¶¨³§ ¯®¨³-¥ ¢³®± ©®¡ ¤µ «´ ³¨® ²¸²³¤¬² £ ¦¤¤± ««¸ ±¤¢®¬¬¤£ ²´¢§ ²¸²³¤¬ ¨¥ ³§¤ ¢´±±¤³ ©®¡ ¤µ «´ ³¨® ¯±®¢¤²² ¨² ®³ ¶®±ª¨¦ ¶¤««ȁ $±ȁ !¡¡®´£ § ² ¡¤¤ ¨µ®«µ¤£ ¨ ¬´«³¨¯«¤ ±¤µ¨²¨®² ®¥ ¯®¨³ ¥ ¢³®± systems ²¨¢¤ ΐΘΘΏȁ 4§¨² ²¸²³¤¬ £®¤² ®³ ±¤°´¨±¤ proprietary ¢®¬¯´³¤± ²®¥³¶ ±¤ £ ´²¤s %·¢¤« ¯±®¦± ¬ ¥®± ©®¡ ²¢®±¨¦ £ ±¤¢®±£ ª¤¤¯¨¦. #¨³¸ ¶®´«£ ±¤¢¤¨µ¤ ²¸²³¤¬ ¬ ´ « ² ¯ ±³ ®¥ ³§¨² ¯±®©¤¢³ȁ c.%µ «´ ³¤ ±®´£ 60 ©®¡² £ ±¤µ¨¤¶ ³§¤ ±¤²´«³² ¶¨³§ ³§¤ #i³¸ ¯±®©¤¢³ ³¤ ¬ȁ 4§¨² ²³¤¯ ³¸¯¨¢ ««¸ ±¤°´¨±¤² ¬´«³¨¯«¤ ±¤µ¨²¨®² £ includes ¨¯´³ ¥±®¬ managers ¨ ®±£¤± ³® ±¤£´¢¤ ±¤°´¤²³² ¥®± ©®¡ ±¤µ¨¤¶s ¥³¤± ¯±®¦± ¬ ±®««®´³ȁ ) ®´± ¤·¯¤±¨¤¢¤Ǿ ³§¨² § ¯¯¤² ¶§¤ managers ±¤ ®³ ¨µ®«µ¤£ ¨ ³§¤ ¢ «¨¡± ³¨® ®¥ ³§¤¨± £¤¯ ±³¬¤³ ©®¡²ȁ d.4§¤ ¥¨ « ¤µ «´ ³¨®² ¶®´«£ ¡¤ ´²¤£ ¨ ¢®¬¡¨ ³¨® ¶¨³§ ¬ ±ª¤³ £ ³ ³® ²²¨¦ ©®¡² ³® ¦± £¤² £ ³® ´¯£ ³¤ ³§¤ ¶ ¦¤ ²³±´¢³´±¤. e.+¤¸²³®¤ ¶®´«£ ¯±®µ¨£¤ #¨³¸ ¶¨³§ j®¡ ±¤µ¨¤¶ ±¤°´¤²³ ¥®±¬ ³® ¡¤ ´²¤£ ¥®± ¥´³´±¤ ©®¡ ±¤- ¤µ «´ ³¨® ±¤°´¤²³² ¶§¤ ©®¡² ¢§ ¦¤ ²¨¦¨¥¨¢ ³«¸. +¤¸²³®¤ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® '±®´¯ ,,# 0 ¦¤ 5 $¤¢¤¬¡¤± ΑΏǾ ΑΏΐΕ Compensation Program Review for Shakopee 4.#®£´¢³ ²³ ³¨²³¨¢ « «¸²¨² ¥®± ³§¤ ¢´±±¤³ ¯ ¸ program a.2¤µ¨¤¶ §¨²³®±¨¢ « «¸²¨² £ ¢´±±¤³ ¨£¨µ¨£´ « ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® £ ¦± £¤². b.#®£´¢³ ¯¯±®¯±¨ ³¤ ²³ ³¨²³¨¢ « «¸²¨² £ ¯±¤¯ ±¤ scatter¯«®³² ³® §¤«¯ ´£¤±²³ £ ¯ ³³¤±² £ ³±¤£² ² ¶¤«« ² ¸ existing in³¤± « ¤°´¨³¸ ¨²²´¤²ȁ c.3´¬¬ ±¨¹¤ ¥¨£¨¦² £ £¤µ¤«®¯ ¯®²²¨¡«¤ ¢®´±²¤ ®¥ ¢³¨® ³® ¢®±±¤¢³ ¨²²´¤². d.S§ ±¤ ±¤²´«³² ®¥ ³§¤²¤ alyse² ¶¨³§ ³§¤ ¯±®©¤¢³ ³¤ ¬/management ² ¤¤£¤£ȁ 5.#®£´¢³ ¬ ±ª¤³ ¯±¨¢¨¦ ¥®± #¨³¸ ¡¤¢§¬ ±ª jobs a.5²¤ ©®¡ £¤²¢±¨¯³¨®² £ ±¤¯®±³¨¦ ±¤« ³¨®²§¨¯² ³® ¬ ³¢§ #¨³¸ ©®¡² ³® ³§¤ ,¤ ¦´¤ ®¥ -¨¤²®³ #¨³¨¤² #®¬¯¤² ³¨® ²´±µ¤¸ ¡¤¢§¬ ±ª jobs. b.#®««¤¢³ ¡ ²¤ ¯ ¸ £ ³ ¥±®¬ ³§¤ ¯´¡«¨¢ ²¤¢³®± ²´±µ¤¸ Ȩ,-N#ȩȁ 3³ ³¨²³¨¢² ¶¤ ¢®««¤¢³ ±¤ ¢³´ « ¯ ¸ £ ² « ±¸ ± ¦¤ ¨¥®±¬ ³¨®ȁ c.3¢±´¡ ²´±µ¤¸ £ ³ ³® ¬ ª¤ ²´±¤ ³§ ³ ¬ ³¢§¤² ¡¸ ¯¤¤± ¦±®´¯ ¢¨³¨¤² ±¤ µ «¨£ȁ 7¤ ¬ ¸ ¢ «« ²®¬¤ ¯ ±³¨¢¨¯ ³² ³® µ¤±¨¥¸ ²®¬¤ ± ³¤²Ǿ ¨¥ ¤¢¤²² ±¸ȁ d.)¥ n® ²®«¨£ ¡¤¢§¬ ±ª ¬ ³¢§ ¥®± ©®¡ ¨² µ ¨« ¡«¤Ǿ ³§¤ ©®¡ ¶®´«£ ¡¤ ²«®³³¤£ ¨ ³§¤ ¦± £¤ ²³±´¢³´±¤ ´²¨¦ ¨³² ©®¡ ¤µ «´ ³¨® ¯®¨³² £ ¨³¤± « ¢®¬¯ ±¨²®² ¶¨³§ ®³§¤± ©®¡² ¶¨³§¨ ³§¤ #ity. e.2¤µ¨¤¶ ¬ ±ª¤³ «¸²¨² ¶¨³§ C¨³¸ ³¤ ¬ ³® ¤²´±¤ ´£¤±²³ £¨¦ ®¥ ³§¤ results £ ³§¤¨± implications. 6.0±¤¯ ±¤ ¢®¬¯ ±¨²®² ¶¨³§ ³§¤ ¬ ±ª¤³ £ ¢ «¨¡± ³¤ salary ranges a.5²¤ ¬ ±ª¤³ £ ³ £ ©®¡ ¤µ «´ ³¨® ¯®¨³² ³® ¤µ «´ ³¤ ³§¤ ¢´±±¤³ ± ¦¤² £ ¢®¬¯ ±¤ ³§¤¬ ¶¨³§ ³§¤ market. b.0±¤¯ ±¤ ²¢ ³³¤±¯«®³² £ ³±¤£ «¨¤² ¥®± ³§¤ ¤¶ ± ¦¤² £ ¢³´ « ² « ±¨¤² ³® ¨««´²³± ³¤ City p ¸ ¯®²¨³¨® re« ³¨µ¤ ³® ³§¤ ¬ ±ª¤³ȁ 4§¨² ²³¤¯ «²® §¤«¯² ¨£¤³¨¥¸ ¸ ®¬ «¨¤² ®± ¯®³¤³¨ « ¨²²´¤² ¶¨³§ ¨³¤± « ¤°´¨³¸ ¦®¨¦ ¥®±¶ ±£ Ȩ3³ ³¤ 0 ¸ %°´¨³¸ !¢³ȩ. c.5²¤ ¬ ±ª¤³ ¯±¨¢¨¦ £ ³ £ ¦¤¤± « ³±¤£ survey² ³® ±¤¢®¬¬¤£ 2017 ¦± £¤ ranges. d.2¤µ¨¤¶ ®´³¢®¬¤² ¶¨³§ #i³¸ ³¤ ¬ ¡¤¥®±¤ ¬®µ¨¦ ³® ¤·³ ²³¤¯ȁ 7.7®±ª ¶¨³§ #ity ²³ ¥¥ ³® ¢®£´¢³ ¡´£¦¤³ ¨¬¯ ¢³ «¸²¨² ¥®± ³§¤ ¯±®¯®²¤£ ranges a.Ci³¸ ¯±¤¯ ±¤² ¤¬¯«®¸¤¤ ±®²³¤± £ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® £ ³ ´²¨¦ ³¤¬¯« ³¤ ¯±®µ¨£¤£ ¡¸ Keystone. b.%µ «´ ³¤ wages ¥®± employees ±¤« ³¨µ¤ ³® ¬ ±ª¤³ £ ³§¤ new ranges. c.Create ®µ¤± «« ²´¬¬ ±¸ ®¥ ³§¤ ¡´£¦¤³ ¨¬¯ ¢³ ¥®± ³§¤ recommend¤£ ± ¦¤². d.$¤³¤±¬¨¤ ² « ±¸ ¢³¨®² ¤¤£¤£ £ ¯±®µ¨£¤ ±¤¢®¬¬¤£ ³¨®². e.4§¨² ²³¤¯ ¨² ³¸¯¨¢ ««¸ ¢®¬¯«¤³¤£ ¨ ¢®«« ¡®± ³¨® ¶¨³§ #¨³¸ ²³ ¥¥. +¤¸²³®¤ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® '±®´¯ ,,# 0 ¦¤ 6 $¤¢¤¬¡¤± ΑΏǾ ΑΏΐΕ Compensation Program Review for Shakopee 8. 4§¤ ²´¢¢¤²² ®¥ ³§¨² ¯±®©¤¢³ ¶¨«« £¤¯¤£ ® ¬ ª¨¦ ²´±¤ ³§ ³ ª¤¸ ²³ ª¤§®«£¤±² ±¤ ¨¥®±¬¤£ ®± ¨µ®«µ¤£ ² ¤¢¤²² ±¸ȁ 4§¨² ¤§ ¢¤² ³§¤ ³±´²³ ¨ ³§¤ ¥¨ « ®´³¢®¬¤² £ §¤«¯² ¶¨³§ ®¯¤ c®¬¬´¨¢ ³¨®² £ ³± ²¯ ±¤¢¸ȁ -¤¤³¨¦² ¶¨³§ ³§¤ #¨³¸ - ¦¤±Ǿ (2 - ¦¤±Ǿ £ $¤¯ ±³¬¤³ (¤ £² ¬ ¸ ¡¤ §¤«£ -¨¥ necessary- ³® ¨¥®±¬ ³§¤¬ ¡®´³ ³§¤ ¯±®¢¤²²Ǿ £¤²¢±¨¡¤ §®¶ ³§¤ ¯±®¦± ¬ ¶®±ª²Ǿ £ ³® ±¤¢¤¨µ¤ feedback (¡´£¦¤³ ¨² ¯±®µ¨£¤£ ¥®± ®¤ ®¯³¨® « ®²¨³¤ meeting). 9.0±¤¯ ±¤ ³§¤ final summary C®²´«³ ³ ¶®´«£ p±¤¯ ±¤ ²´¬¬ ±¸ that includes ¬¤³§®£®«®¦¸Ǿ ¡¤¢§¬ ±ª «¸²¨² resultsǾ ²¯¤¢¨¥¨¢ ®¡²¤±µ ³¨®²Ǿ £ ±¤¢®¬¬¤£ ³¨®²ȁ !«« ¨¥®±¬ ³¨® ¶®´«£ ¡¤ ¯±®µ¨£¤£ ³® Ci³¸ ¤«¤¢³±®¨¢ ««¸ȁ Ci³¸ ¶®´«£ «²® ±¤¢¤¨µ¤ ¢®¯¸ ®¥ ³§¤ +¤¸²³®¤ *®¡ ,¤µ¤«¨¦ 3¸²³¤¬ ¶¨³§ ¨³² ¥¨ « ©®¡ ¤µ «´ ³¨® ¯®¨³² £ ¦± £¤ ²²¨¦¬¤³ ³® ¬ ¨³ ¨ ²¸²³¤¬ ¨³¤± ««¸ȁ 10./¦®¨¦ ¯±®¦± ¬ ²upport 7¤ appr® ¢§ ³§¨² ²³´£¸ ² ¡¤¨¦ ¸®´± ¡´²¨¤²² ¯ ±³¤± ¨µ¤²³¤£ ¨ ³§¤ ²´¢¢¤²² ®¥ ³§¨² programȁ /´± ¦® « ¨² ³® ¤²´±¤ ª®¶«¤£¦¤ ³± ²¥¤± ¥±®¬ ¢®²´«³ ³ ³® #i³¸ ²³ ¥¥ £ ³® §¤«¯ ³§¤ #it¸ ²´²³ ¨ ³§¤ ¯±®¦± ¬ ¨³¤± ««¸ ¦®¨¦ ¥®±¶ ±£ȁ 7¤ ¶®´«£ ¡¤ µ ¨« ¡«¤ ³® ²´¯¯®±³ ³§¤ #i³¸ ¥³¤± ¯±®©¤¢³ ¢®¬¯«¤³¨® £ ³® ²¶¤± °´¤²³¨®²ȁ 3¨¬¯«¤ £ ²§®±³ ¨°´¨±¨¤² ±¤ ²¶¤±¤£ ³ ® ££¨³¨® « ¢®²³Ǿ ¶§¨«¤ ¬®±¤ ²´¡²³ ³¨ « ¶®±ª ¶®´«£ ¡¤ °´®³¤£ ® ¯±®©¤¢³ basis. +¤¸²³®¤ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® '±®´¯ ,,# 0 ¦¤ 7 $¤¢¤¬¡¤± ΑΏǾ ΑΏΐΕ Compensation Program Review for Shakopee 0±®©¤¢³ 4¤ ¬ £ 2¤« ³¤£ %·¯¤±¨¤¢¤ 4§¨² ¯±®©¤¢³ ¶®´«£ ¡¤ «¤£ ¡¸ $±ȁ 3 £® 9ȁ !¡¡®´£ ¶§® ¶®´«£ ¡¤ ³§¤ ¥¨±²³ ¢®³ ¢³ ¥®± ³§¤ #ityȁ Ste¥ 0¤³¤±²®Ǿ 3±ȁ #®²´«³ ³ ¶¨³§ +¤¸²³®¤Ǿ assists ¶¨³§ ¤¬¯«®¸¤¤ ¨³¤±µ¨¤¶² £ provides ¡¤¢§¬ ±ª¨¦ £ «¸³¨¢ « ²´¯¯®±³ ³® ³§¨² ¯±®©¤¢³ȁ !¬®¦ ³§¤ ²¯¤¢¨¥¨¢ ¤·¯¤±¨¤¢¤ ³§ ³ 3 £® § ² ±¤« ³¤£ ³® ¯´¡«¨¢ ²¤¢³®± ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® £ ³§¨² ²³´£¸Ȁ 1.#´±±¤³«¸ ¬ ¦¨¦ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ²´±µ¤¸ ¶¨³§ ΐ4 ¬ ©®± ¢®´³¨¤² £ « ±¦¤ ¢¨³¨¤² ¨ Minnesota ¢®µ¤±¨¦ ®µ¤± ΐ60 jobs. #®´³¨¤² £ ¢¨³¨¤² «¨ª¤ (¤¤¯¨ #®´³¸Ǿ 2 ¬²¤¸Ǿ $ ª®³ Ǿ !®ª Ǿ 3³ȁ ,®´¨² CountyǾ /«¬²³¤£Ǿ 3³¤ ±²Ǿ 7 ²§¨¦³®Ǿ 3§¤±¡´±¤Ǿ # ±µ¤±Ǿ 3¢®³³Ǿ #¨³¸ ®¥ 2®¢§¤²³¤±Ǿ #¨³¸ ®¥ "«®®¬¨¦³®, £ ®³§¤± ¦¤¢¨¤² ¯ ±³¨¢¨¯ ³¤ ¨ ³§¨² ´ « ¬ ±ª¤³ study. 2.( £ ¬ ¦¤£ ³§¤ ´ « ¬ ±ª¤³ ²´±µ¤¸ ¥®± -¨¤²®³ ¬¤³±® ¢¨³¨¤² £ ¢®´³¨¤² ¥®± ®µ¤± ΐΑ years Ȩ3³ ³® '±®´¯ -¤³±® 3´±µ¤¸ȩȁ 4§¨² ²´±µ¤¸ ¨² ¢´±±¤³«¸ ¯ ±³ ®¥ ³§¤ ,¤ ¦´¤ ®¥ -. #¨³¨¤² 3´±µ¤¸ȁ 3.%·³¤²¨µ¤ ¤·¯¤±¨¤¢¤ ¶¨³§ £¤µ¤«®¯¨¦ £ ¨¬¯«¤¬¤³¨¦ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬² ¨ µ ±¨®´² ¨£´²³±¨¤² ¨¢«´£¨¦ ¦®µ¤±¬¤³Ǿ ®-¯±®¥¨³Ǿ £ ¯±¨µ ³¤ ²¤¢³®±²ȁ 4.Has ²¨¦¨¥¨¢ ³ ¤·¯¤±¨¤¢¤ work¨¦ with ²¤µ¤± « ¢®´³¨¤² £ ¢¨³¨¤²ȁ !¬®¦ ®´± ¢«¨¤³ #®´³¨¤² £ #¨³¨¤²Ȁ 3¢®³³Ǿ $ ª®³ Ǿ AnokaǾ #¨³¸ ®¥ 3³ȁ ,®´¨² 0 ±ªǾ #¨³¸ ®¥ & ±¨¡ ´«³Ǿ #¨³¸ ®¥ #§ § ²²¤Ǿ #¨³¸ ®¥ RochesterǾ #¨³¸ ®¥ (´³¢§¨²®Ǿ #¨³¸ ®¥ - ¯«¤¶®®£Ǿ #¨³¸ ®¥ !¯¯«¤ 6 ««¤¸Ǿ # ±«³® #®´³¸Ǿ -¢,¤®£ #®´³¸Ǿ £ #±®¶ 7¨¦ #®´³¸ ¬®¦ ®³§¤±²ȁ 5.3 £® «²® ¢®-author¤£ ground-¡± ª¨¦ ±³¨¢«¤ ¨ ³§¤ 7®±«£ ³7®±ª *®´± « ® ³§¤ performance-¡ ²¤£ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬ ³ 3¢®³³ #®´³¸ȁ (¤ ±¤¢¤¨µ¤£ !´³§®± ®¥ ³§¤ 9¤ ± !¶ ±£ ¨ ΑΏΐΐ ¥®± ¶±¨³¨¦ ³§¨² ±³¨¢«¤ȁ 6.- ¸ ¸¤ ±² ®¥ ¤·¯¤±¨¤¢¤ ² ¢®±¯®± ³¤ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ¬ ¦¤±, ¯±®¥¤²²¨® « ¢®²´«³ ³Ǿ £ "® ±£ «¤ £¤±²§¨¯ ®¥ ²¤µ¤± « ¯±®¥¤²²¨® « ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ²²®¢¨ ³¨®²ȁ +¤¸²³®¤ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® '±®´¯ ,,# 0 ¦¤ 8 $¤¢¤¬¡¤± ΑΏǾ ΑΏΐΕ Compensation Program Review for Shakopee %²³¨¬ ³¤£ &¨ ¢¨ « "´£¦¤³ £ 0±¤«¨¬¨ ±¸ Timeline 4¤³ ³¨µ¤ Step Description Total Comments Timeline )¨³¨ « ¯« ¨¦Ǿ £®¢´¬¤³ ¢®««¤¢³¨®Ǿ 7¨³§ (2 - ¦¤± £ 1 ±®«¤² £ ±¤²¯®²¨¡¨«¨³¨¤²Ǿ £ 7¤¤ª² ΐ-2 ͡ΐǾΓΓΏ #¨³¸ - ¦¤± ³¨¬¤«¨¤ ¯¯±®µ « %µ «´ ³¤ ©®¡² ´²¨¦ +¤¸²³®¤ *®¡ ,¤µ¤«¨¦ 3¸²³¤¬Ǿ ¢ «¨¡± ³¨® ¶¨³§ )µ®«µ¤² ±¤µ¨¤¶¨¦ ¶¨³§ 2 7¤¤ª² Γ-9 ͡ΔǾΖΕΏ ¬ ¦¤±²Ǿ £ ¥¨ «¨¹¤ ±¤²´«³² ȨΔΔ-ΕΏ £¤¯ ±³¬¤³ ¬ ¦¤±² Jobs) ,¤ ¦´¤ ®¥ -. #¨³¨¤² 3 "¤¢§¬ ±ª¨¦ ®¥ *®¡² 7¤¤ª² ΐΏ-14 ͡ΔǾΖΕΏ 3´±µ¤¸ Ȩ¯¤¤± ¦±®´¯ȩ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® «¸²¨²Ǿ ´¯£ ³¤ &®¢´² ¨² ® ®-´¨® 4 ²³±´¢³´±¤Ǿ ¢®¬¯«¨ ¢¤ ¢§¤¢ªǾ 7¤¤ª² ΐΔ-17 ͡ΑǾΗΗΏ jobs recommendations )£¤³¨¥¸ ¤¬¯«®¸¤¤² 5 0±®¦± ¬ ¢®²³¨¦ £ ¡´£¦¤³ «¸²¨² 7¤¤ª ΐΗ ͡ΘΏΏ ®´³²¨£¤ ³§¤ ¤²³ ¡«¨²§¤£ ¯ ¸ ± ¦¤ 5¯£ ³¤ ¬¤¤³¨¦² ¶¨³§ ¯±®©¤¢³ ³¤ ¬ /²¨³¤ ¬¤¤³¨¦² ¡ ²¤£ 6 £ $¤¯ ±³¬¤³ (¤ £² Ȩ®¤ ®¯³¨® « Varies ͡ΐǾΏΗΏ ® ª¤¸ ¬¨«¤²³®¤² ®²¨³¤ ¯±¤²¤³ ³¨®ȩ &¨ « ²´¬¬ ±¸Ǿ ¯±®©¤¢³ %«¤¢³±®¨¢ £®¢´¬¤³² 7 Varies ͡ΐǾΕΏΏ £®¢´¬¤³ ³¨®Ǿ £¬¨¨²³± ³¨µ¤ provided $´± ³¨® µ ±¨¤² ¡ ²¤£ /µ¤± «« "´£¦¤³ («®¶¤± figure $18,340- 7¤¤ª² ΐ- 18 ® µ ¨« ¡¨«¨³¸ ®¥ #¨³¸ ¤·¢«´£¤² ®¯³¨® « ²³¤¯) ͡ΐΘǾΓΑΏ staff Notes 1.Keystone ¶®´«£ ¨µ®¨¢¤ ³§¤ #¨³¸ ¥³¤± ¢®¬¯«¤³¨® ®¥ ¤ ¢§ ª¤¸ milestone Ȩ²³¤¯² ΑǾ 4Ǿ 7)ȁ 2.Th¨² e²³¨¬ ³¤ ¨² not-to-¤·¢¤¤£ ¬®´³ £ ¨² ¡ ²¤£ ® ®´± ´£¤±²³ £¨¦ ®¥ ³§¤ ²¢®¯¤ ®¥ ³§¤ project. 3.4¨¬¤«¨¤ ¨² ¯« ¢¤§®«£¤± ¥®± stepsȁ 5¯® ¢¢¤¯³¨¦ ¯±®¯®² «Ǿ ¢®²´«³ ³ ¶®´«£ ¯±¤¯ ±¤ ¯±®©¤¢³ ¯« ¶¨³§ ¬®±¤ ¯±¤¢¨²¤ ³¨¬¤«¨¤ £ £¤²¨±¤£ ¢®¬¯«¤³¨® £ ³¤ ¶§¨«¤ ¦¨µ¨¦ ¤ ¢§ ²³¤¯ ¤®´¦§ ³¨¬¤ ¥®± ¯±®¯¤± ¢®¬¯«¤³¨®ȁ 4.4§¨² ¡´£¦¤³ £ ³¨¬¤«¨¤ ¬ ¸ ¡¤ £©´²³¤£ ¨¥ ³§¤ #¨³¸ ¬®£¨¥¨¤£ ¯±®©¤¢³ ¯±®¢¤²²¤²ȁ +¤¸²³®¤ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® '±®´¯ ,,# 0 ¦¤ 9 $¤¢¤¬¡¤± ΑΏǾ ΑΏΐΕ Compensation Program Review for Shakopee 7§¸ +¤¸²³®¤ȅ 1.#«¨¤³ 2¤« ³¨®²§¨¯ FocusȀ /´± ¢®²´«³ ³² ¤¬¯§ ²¨¹¤ ²³±®¦ ±¤« ³¨®²§¨¯² ¶¨³§ ®´± ¢«¨¤³² ¡ ²¤£ ® ¬´³´ « ±¤²¯¤¢³Ǿ ±¤²¯®²¨µ¤¤²²Ǿ £ ¦¤´¨¤ £¤²¨±¤ ³® §¤«¯. 2.+®¶«¤£¦¤ £ Expertise: 7¨³§ µ¤± ¦¤ ¤·¯¤±¨¤¢¤ ®¥ ΑΔ ¸¤ ±² ¨ ³§¤ ¥¨¤«£Ǿ ®´± ¢®²´«³ ³² § µ¤ ¢°´¨±¤£ ²¨¦¨¥¨¢ ³ ª®¶«¤£¦¤ £ ¤·¯¤±³¨²¤ ¨ µ ±¨®´² ¨£´²³±¨¤² £ ®±¦ ¨¹ ³¨®²ȁ 3./´± 6 «´¤²Ȁ )³¤¦±¨³¸Ǿ ¤·¢¤««¤¢¤Ǿ £ ²¤±µ¨¢¤ ¦´¨£¤ ®´± ¶®±ª¨¦ ±¤« ³¨®²§¨¯ ¶¨³§ ®´± clients. 4."´²¨¤²² !¢´¬¤Ȁ 7¤ ¨µ¤²³ ²¨¦¨¥¨¢ ³ ¬®´³ ®¥ ³¨¬¤ ´¯¥±®³ ³® ¡¤³³¤± ´£¤±²³ £ ³§¤ ¨²²´¤² ±¤ ±¤²®«µ¨¦ȁ 7¤ µ¨¤¶ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ² ²³± ³¤¦¨¢ ¨µ¤²³¬¤³ ³§ ³ ®±¦ ¨¹ ³¨®² ¬ ª¤ ¨ ³§¤¨± ¤¬¯«®¸¤¤²ȁ O´± ±®«¤ ¨² ³® §¤«¯ ¢«¨¤³² ¬ ¦¤ thi² ¨µ¤²³¬¤³ ¨ ®±£¤± to better ³³± ¢³Ǿ ¬®³¨µ ³¤Ǿ £ ±¤³ ¨ ³§¤¨± ³ «¤³ £ ¨¬¯±®µ¤ the¨± ¡´²¨¤²² ®´³¢®¬¤². 0±®¯®² « Approval 4§¨² ¯±®¯®² « ¨² ¯±¤¯ ±¤£ ¡ ²¤£ ® ®´± ´£¤±²³ £¨¦ ®¥ ³§¤ ²¢®¯¤ ®¥ ³§¤ ²¤±µ¨¢¤² requestedȁ !££¨³¨® « ¶®±ª ®´³²¨£¤ ®¥ ³§¤ ²¢®¯¤ ¬ ¸ ¡¤ ¯±¨¢¤£ ²¤¯ ± ³¤«¸ ´¯® ±¤°´¤²³ ¥±®¬ ³§¤ #ity. 7¤ ¢ ²³ ±³ ³§¨² ²³´£¸ ¶¨³§¨ ³¶®-three ¶¤¤ª² ¥³¤± ±¤¢¤¨µ¨¦ ¯¯±®µ « ¥®± ³§¨² ¯±®¯®² «. 3¯¤¢¨¥¨¢ £ ³¤² ¬ ¸ ¡¤ £¤³¤±¬¨¤£ ®¢¤ ³§¤ ¯±®©¤¢³ ¨² ¯¯±®µ¤£ȁ 7¤ ±¤ ¯±¨µ¨«¤¦¤£ ³® ¡¤ ¢®²¨£¤±¤£ ¥®± ³§¨² ¯±®©¤¢³ £ «®®ª ¥®±¶ ±£ ³® ³§¤ ®¯¯®±³´¨³¸ ³® ¶®±ª ¶¨³§ ¸®´ ® ³§¨² ¨¬¯®±³ ³ ²³´£¸ȅ )¥ ¸®´ § µ¤ ¸ °´¤²³¨®²Ǿ ¯«¤ ²¤ ¢ «« 3 £® !¡¡®´£ ³Ȁ ΕΐΑȁΗΐΏȁΒΔΑΑ ®± ¤¬ ¨« §¨¬ ³Ȁ sabboud@keystonecomp.net. )¥ ¸®´ ¯¯±®µ¤ ³§¨² ¯±®¯®² «Ǿ ¯«¤ ²¤ ²¨¦ ¡¤«®¶ £ ±¤³´± ¢®¯¸ ®¥ ³§¨² ¯ ¦¤ ³§¨² ¦±¤¤¬¤³ ³® 3 £® !¡¡®´£ ³Ȁ sabboud@keystonecomp.net C¨³¸ A´³§®±¨¹¤£ Signature: !¯¯±®µ¤£ ¡¸ Title Date +¤¸²³®¤ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® '±®´¯ ,,# 0 ¦¤ 10 $¤¢¤¬¡¤± ΑΏǾ ΑΏΐΕ Compensation Program Review for Shakopee 3 £® 9ȁ !¡¡®´£Ǿ 0§ȁ$ȁ Keystone Compensation Group ,LLC Principal Consultant ΒΒΐΕ %²¨¦ !µ¤ .®±³§ -¨¤ ¯®«¨² -. ΔΔΓΑΖ 4¤«Ȁ 612.810.3522 Sabboud@keystonecomp.net www.keystonecomp.net 3 £® ¨² ¥®´£¨¦ ¯ ±³¤± of +¤¸²³®¤ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® '±®´¯ ¶¨³§ ®µ¤± ³¶¤³¸ ¥¨µ¤ ¸¤ ±² ®¥ LLC ¤·¯¤±¨¤¢¤ ¨ ³§¤ ¥¨¤«£ ®¥ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨®ȁ (¨² ¤·¯¤±¨¤¢¤ ¨µ®«µ¤² «« ¯§ ²¤² ®¥ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬ £¤µ¤«®¯¬¤³Ǿ ²³± ³¤¦¸Ǿ £¤²¨¦ £ ¬ ¦¤¬¤³ȁ (¨² ¢«¨¤³² ¨¢«´£¤ ®±¦ ¨¹ ³¨®² ¨ ¯±¨µ ³¤Ǿ ¯´¡«¨¢ ²¤¢³®±Ǿ £ ®¯±®¥¨³ȁ (¤ ¢®²´«³² ¶¨³§ ³®¯ ¤·¤¢´³¨µ¤² £ ¡® ±£ ®¥ £¨±¤¢³®±² ® ¤·¤¢´³¨µ¤ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® £¤²¨¦ £ ¬ ¦¤¬¤³. (¨² ¢®¬¡¨¤£ ¤·¯¤±¨¤¢¤ ¨ ¬ ¦¨¦ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬² ¶¨³§¨ &®±³´¤ ΐΏΏ ¢®¬¯ ¸ £ ² ¯±®¥¤²²¨® « ¢®²´«³ ³ ¦¨µ¤² §¨¬ ¡ « ¢¤£ µ¨¤¶ ¥®± ²®«µ¨¦ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ¨²²´¤²ȁ -®²³ ±¤¢¤³«¸ 3 £® ²¤±µ¤£ ² 6¨¢¤ 0±¤²¨£¤³Ǿ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® 0± ¢³¨¢¤ ¥®± 3³ ³® '±®´¯Ǿ ±¤¦¨® « ¢®²´«³¨¦ £ ²´±µ¤¸ ±¤²¤ ±¢§ ¥¨±¬ ¨ -¨¤ ¯®«¨²ȁ (¤ ¶®±ª¤£ ¢«®²¤«¸ ¶¨³§ ¡´²¨¤²² £ (2 leaders ² ¶¤«« ² "® ±£² ®¥ $¨±¤¢³®±² ³® £¤µ¤«®¯ ±¤¶ ±£² ¯±®¦± ¬² ¥®± ¤·¤¢´³¨µ¤²Ǿ ¬¨££«¤ ¬ ¦¤¬¤³Ǿ £ ®³§¤± ¤¬¯«®¸¤¤²ȁ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ¤·¯¤±¨¤¢¤ ¨¢«´£¤² £¤µ¤«®¯¨¦ ¡ ²¤ ¯ ¸Ǿ short-³¤±¬ £ «®¦-³¤±¬ ¨¢¤³¨µ¤ ¯±®¦± ¬² ³® ³³± ¢³ £ ¬®³¨µ ³¤ ¤¬¯«®¸¤¤²ȁ (¤ «²® §¤«p² §¨² ¢«¨¤³² ¶¨³§ ¢®¬¬´¨¢ ³¨¦ ±¤¶ ±£ ¯±®¦± ¬². 0±¨®± ³® ©®¨¨¦ 3³ ³® '±®´¯Ǿ 3 £® ²¯¤³ ²¤µ¤± « ¸¤ ±² ¨ ²¤¨®± «¤ £¤±²§¨¯ ¯®²¨³¨® ³ "¤²³ "´¸ #®ȁ ¶¨³§ ±¤²¯®²¨¡¨«¨³¨¤² ®µ¤± ¢®±¯®± ³¤ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬² ² ¶¤«« ² ¤·¤¢´³¨µ¤ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨®ȁ !¬®¦ §¨² ®³§¤± ¢¢®¬¯«¨²§¬¤³² ¶ ² ³ ª¨¦ ª¤¸ ±®«¤ ¨ ±¤²³±´¢³´±¨¦ ³§¤ (2 ¥´¢³¨® £ «¤ £¨¦ ²¤µ¤± « ³¤¢§®«®¦¸ ¨¨³¨ ³¨µ¤² ³® ²´¯¯®±³ ¡´²¨¤²² ¦±®¶³§ȁ (¤ ¢®³±¨¡´³¤£ ±³¨¢«¤² £ ¨³¤±µ¨¤¶² ³® ²¤µ¤± « ³± £¤ ¯´¡«¨¢ ³¨®²Ǿ ¨¢«´£¨¦ Workspan Ǿ ¬®³§«¸ ©®´± « ¥®± ³®³ « ±¤¶ ±£² ¯±®¥¤²²¨® «²Ǿ -¨¤²®³ " ª¤±² .¤¶² £ ³§¤ 4¶¨ #¨³¨¤² "´²¨¤²² *®´± «. % ±«¸ ¨ §¨² ¢ ±¤¤±Ǿ 3 £® ³ ´¦§³ ³ ³§¤ ¢®««¤¦¤ £ ¦± £´ ³¤ ²¢§®®« «¤µ¤«²Ǿ £®¬¤²³¨¢ ««¸ £ ¡±® £ȁ (¤ § ² ¥±®¬ ³§¤ 5¨µ¤±²¨³¸ ®¥ -¨¤²®³ ¨ 1´ ³¨³ ³¨µ¤ ! «¸²¨²ȁ (¤ «²® ±¤¢¤¨µ¤£ §¨² -"! £¤¦±¤¤ ¨ #®±¯®± ³¤ &¨ ¢¤ ¥±®¬ ³§¤ 5¨µ¤±²¨³¸ ®¥ 3³ȁ 4§®¬ ²ȁ 3 £® ¨² ¢¤±³¨¥¨¤£ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ¯±®¥¤²²¨® « Ȩ##0ȩ, ¬¤¬¡¤± ®¥ 7®±«£ ³7®±ªǾ £ ¯ ²³ #§ ¨±¬ ®¥ ³§¤ Local .¤³¶®±ª !£µ¨²®±¸ "® ±£ ¥®± 7®±«£ ³7®±ªȁ 3 £® «²® ²¤±µ¤£ ¥®± ²¤µ¤± « ¸¤ ±² ® ² the #§ ¨±¬ ®¥ ³§¤ 4¶¨ #¨³¨¤² #®¬¯¤² ³¨® .¤³¶®±ª "® ±£ ®¥ $¨±¤¢³®±²ȁ +¤¸²³®¤ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® '±®´¯ ,,# 0 ¦¤ 11 $¤¢¤¬¡¤± ΑΏǾ ΑΏΐΕ Compensation Program Review for Shakopee 3³¤¥ +ȁ 0¤³¤±²®Ǿ ##0 Keystone Compensation Group ,LLC Principal Consultant ΒΒΐΕ %²¨¦ !µ¤ .®±³§ -¨¤ ¯®«¨² -. 55427 4¤«Ȁ ΘΔΑȁΑΖΏȁΐΐΐΓ Speterson@keystonecomp.net www.keystonecomp.net 3³¤¥ ¨² 3¤¨®± #®¬¯¤² ³¨® #®²´«³ ³ ³ +¤¸²³®¤ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® '±®´¯ ,,# ¶¨³§ ®µ¤± ³§¨±³¸ ¸¤ ±² ®¥ ¤·¯¤±¨¤¢¤ ¨ ³§¤ ¥¨¤«£ ®¥ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨®ȁ (¨² ¤·¯¤±¨¤¢¤ ¨µ®«µ¤² ¬ ¦¨¦ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨®Ǿ ¡¤¤¥¨³²Ǿ £ §´¬ ±¤²®´±¢¤² ²¸²³¤¬²ȁ (¨² ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® £ ¡¤¤¥¨³² ¢ ±¤¤± ¨¢«´£¤£ ®±¦ ¨¹ ³¨®² ¨ ³§¤ §¤ «³§¢ ±¤Ǿ ±¤³ ¨«Ǿ ³¤¢§®«®¦¸Ǿ £ ¬ ´¥ ¢³´±¨¦ ¨£´²³±¨¤²ȁ (¨² ¤·¯¤±¨¤¢¤ ¨ ¬ ¦¨¦ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® £ ¡¤¤¥¨³² ¯±®¦± ¬² ¶¨³§¨ &®±³´¤ ΐΏΏ ¢®¬¯ ¨¤² £ ¬¨£²¨¹¤ ®±¦ ¨¹ ³¨®² ´¨°´¤«¸ °´ «¨¥¨¤² §¨¬ ³® ²®«µ¤ £¨µ¤±²¤ ¢«¨¤³ ¢§ ««¤¦¤²ȁ -®²³ ±¤¢¤³«¸ 3³¤¥ ²¤±µ¤£ ² 3±ȁ $¨±¤¢³®± ®¥ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® £ "¤¤¥¨³² ³ & ¨±µ¨¤¶ (¤ «³§ 3¤±µ¨¢¤²Ǿ ¯±¤¬¨¤± §¤ «³§¢ ±¤ ®±¦ ¨¹ ³¨® ¨ -¨¤ ¯®«¨²ȁ (¤ § £ ±¤²¯®²¨¡¨«¨³¸ ®µ¤± ³¤ ¬ ¢§ ±¦¤£ ¶¨³§ ³§¤ ±¤£¤²¨¦¨¦ ®¥ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® £ ¡¤¤¥¨³² ¯±®¦± ¬² ² ¶¤«« ² ³§¤ ¨¬¯«¤¬¤³ ³¨® ®¥ ¤¶ §´¬ ±¤²®´±¢¤² £ ¯ ¸±®«« ²¸²³¤¬²ȁ (¤ «²® ¯±®µ¨£¤£ ¤·¤¢´³¨µ¤ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® ¢®²´«³¨¦ ¨¢«´£¤² £¤µ¤«®¯¨¦ ¡ ²¤ ¯ ¸Ǿ ²§®±³-³¤±¬Ǿ £ «®¦-³¤±¬ ¨¢¤³¨µ¤ ¯±®¦± ¬² ³® ³³± ¢³ £ ¬®³¨µ ³¤ employees. 0±¨®± ³® ©®¨¨¦ & ¨±µ¨¤¶ (¤ «³§ 3¤±µ¨¢¤²Ǿ 3³¤¥ §¤«£ ²¤µ¤± « ²¤¨®± «¤ £¤±²§¨¯ ¯®²¨³¨®² ³ . ²§ &¨¢§ #®¬¯ ¸Ǿ 0¤ ±²® )¢ȁǾ . ³¨® « #®¬¯´³¤± 3¸²³¤¬²Ǿ "-# )£´²³±¨¤²Ǿ !««¨ ³ 4¤¢§²¸²³¤¬² £ (®¤¸¶¤«« )¢ȁ ) «« ³§¤²¤ ®±¦ ¨¹ ³¨®² §¤ § £ ¡±® £ ±¤²¯®²¨¡¨«¨³¨¤² ®µ¤± ¡ ²¤ ¯ ¸ ¯±®¦± ¬²Ǿ ©®¡ ¤µ «´ ³¨®Ǿ £ ¤·¤¢´³¨µ¤ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨®ȁ § ² ¡¤¤ ¥ ¢´«³¸ ¬¤¬¡¤± ³ ³§¤ -¤³±®¯®«¨³ 3³ ³¤ 5¨µ¤±²¨³¸ ¥®± ®µ¤± ³¶¤³¸ ¸¤ ±² ³¤ ¢§¨¦ ¢®¬¯¤² ³¨® £ ¡¤¤¥¨³² ¢« ²²¤²ȁ (¤ ¨² #¤±³¨¥¨¤£ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® 0±®¥¤²²¨® « Ȩ##0ȩ £ 3¤¨®± 0±®¥¤²²¨® « ¨ (´¬ 2¤²®´±¢¤² Ȩ30(2ȩȁ 3³¤¥ ¨² ¬¤¬¡¤± ®¥ 7®±«£ ³7®±ª £ ³§¤ 4¶¨ #¨³¨¤² #®¬¯¤² ³¨® .¤³¶®±ª Ȩ4##.ȩȁ (¤ «²® ²¤±µ¤£ ® ³§¤ 4¶¨ #¨³¨¤² #®¬¯¤² ³¨® .¤³¶®±ª "® ±£ ®¥ $¨±¤¢³®±²ȁ +¤¸²³®¤ #®¬¯¤² ³¨® '±®´¯ ,,# 0 ¦¤ 12 Keystone Job Leveling System Information Technology Solutions A Point-Factor Job Evaluation Method Evaluate jobs to determine appropriate pay for a position, KAT EY SPECTS OF HE ensure internal equity, and effectively link your overall pay S YSTEM program to the appropriate labor market. hƦĻƓ ğƩĭŷźƷĻĭƷǒƩĻ ƭǤƭƷĻƒ ƷŷğƷ ƩĻƌźĻƭ ƚƓ ĬĻƭƷ ƦƩğĭƷźĭĻƭ źƓ ƷŷĻ ƒğƩƉĻƷ ƦƌğĭĻ Ʒƚ ğƭƭźŭƓ ƌĻǝĻƌƭ Ʒƚ ƆƚĬƭ ĬğƭĻķ ƚƓ ƩĻƨǒźƩĻƒĻƓƷƭ ƚŅ ŷĻƭĻ ŅğĭƷƚƩƭ ĻǣƦƩĻƭƭ ŷƚǞ ƚƩŭğƓźǩğƷźƚƓƭ ĭŷƚƚƭĻ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ ƆƚĬ ğƓķ ŅğĭƷƚƩƭ ƷŷğƷ ğƩĻ ŷĻ YĻǤƭƷƚƓĻ WƚĬ \[ĻǝĻƌźƓŭ {ǤƭƷĻƒ źƭ ğƓ ƩĻǞğƩķ ƷŷĻźƩ ƦĻƚƦƌĻ ğƓķ ƷŷĻ ƩĻƨǒźƩĻƒĻƓƷƭ ƓĻĻķĻķ Ʒƚ ŅƚǒƓķ ğĭƩƚƭƭ ğƌƌ ƆƚĬƭ źƓ ǝğƩǤźƓŭ ƚƦĻƓ ğƩĭŷźƷĻĭƷǒƩĻ ƭǤƭƷĻƒ ķĻƭźŭƓĻķ Ʒƚ ķĻƌźǝĻƩ ĬǒƭźƓĻƭƭ ƩĻƭǒƌƷƭ͵ ķĻŭƩĻĻƭ͵ źƓĭƚƩƦƚƩğƷĻ ƷŷĻ ƒƚƭƷ ǞźķĻƌǤ ǒƭĻķ Њ͵ ŷĻ Knowledge, Skills & Competence: ĻƌĻƒĻƓƷƭ ƚŅ ƆƚĬ ĻǝğƌǒğƷźƚƓ źƓ ƚƩķĻƩ Ʒƚ ƉƓƚǞƌĻķŭĻ ğƓķ ƭƉźƌƌƭ ŭğźƓĻķ ƷŷƩƚǒŭŷ ĻķǒĭğƷźƚƓͲ SL TRONG INK TO THE ĻƭƷğĬƌźƭŷ ğƓ źƓƷĻƩƓğƌ ƆƚĬ ŷźĻƩğƩĭŷǤ͵ ŷźƭ ƷƩğźƓźƓŭͲ ğƓķ ƷŷĻ ĻǣƦĻƩźĻƓĭĻ ƩĻƨǒźƩĻķ ŅƚƩ ŅǒƌŅźƌƌźƓŭ M ARKET ƭǤƭƷĻƒ źƭ ƭźƒƦƌĻ Ʒƚ ǒƭĻ ğƓķ źƓĭƚƩƦƚƩğƷĻƭ ƷŷĻ ƚǝĻƩğƌƌ ƦǒƩƦƚƭĻ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ ƆƚĬ͵ hƓĭĻ ƆƚĬƭ ğƩĻ ĻǝğƌǒğƷĻķͲ ƷŷĻ ƒƚƭƷ ǞźķĻƌǤ ğĭĭĻƦƷĻķ ĭƚƒƦĻƓƭğĬƌĻ ƚƩŭğƓźǩğƷźƚƓƭ ğƩĻ ƚƓ ƷŷĻźƩ ǞğǤ ŅğĭƷƚƩƭ Ʒƚ ğƭƭźŭƓ ƭǒźƷğĬƌĻ ƌĻǝĻƌƭ Ʒƚ Ļğĭŷ Ћ͵ ŷĻ źƒƦğĭƷ ĬǤ ƷŷĻ Level of Responsibility: Ʒƚ ĬĻŭźƓ ƒğƩƉĻƷ ğƓğƌǤƭźƭ ğƓķ ƆƚĬ͵ ŷĻƭĻ ƌĻǝĻƌƭ ğƩĻ ƷŷĻƓ ĭƚƓǝĻƩƷĻķ źƓƷƚ źƓķźǝźķǒğƌ źƓ ƷŷĻ ƆƚĬ ƚƓ ƷŷĻ ğĭŷźĻǝźƓŭ ƷŷĻ ķĻǝĻƌƚƦ ƦğǤ ƦƩƚŭƩğƒƭ ƷŷğƷ ğƩĻ ƚĬƆĻĭƷźǝĻƭ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ ƷĻğƒͲ ķĻƦğƩƷƒĻƓƷͲ ĬǒƭźƓĻƭƭ ƦƚźƓƷƭ ǒƭźƓŭ ğ ƭƦĻĭźğƌźǩĻķ ƭƦƩĻğķƭŷĻĻƷ͵ ŅǒƓĭƷźƚƓ ƚƩ ƚƩŭğƓźǩğƷźƚƓ͵ ĻǣƷĻƩƓğƌƌǤ ĭƚƒƦĻƷźƷźǝĻ ğƓķ ƷŷğƷ ŷĻ ƭƦƩĻğķƭŷĻĻƷ ğƌƭƚ ƦƩƚǝźķĻƭ ğƓ ƚǝĻƩğƌƌ ğƌƭƚ ƷğƉĻ źƓƷĻƩƓğƌ ĻƨǒźƷǤ źƓƷƚ ƩĻƦƚƩƷͲ ƭƚƩƷĻķ ĬǤ ƌĻǝĻƌͲ ŅƚƩ ğƌƌ ƆƚĬƭ Ќ͵ /ƚƒƦƌĻǣźƷǤ ƩĻŅĻƩƭ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ Level of Complexity: ĭƚƓƭźķĻƩğƷźƚƓ͵ ĻǝğƌǒğƷĻķ Ʒƚ ĻƓƭǒƩĻ ĻǝğƌǒğƷźƚƓ ƩĻƭǒƌƷƭ ǝğƩźĻƷǤ ğƓķ ķźǝĻƩƭźƷǤ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ ǞƚƩƉ ğƭƭźŭƓĻķ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ ğƩĻ ǝźĻǞĻķ ğƭ ŅğźƩ ğƓķ ĭƩĻķźĬƌĻ͵ ƷŷĻ ķĻĭźƭźƚƓƭ ƆƚĬͲ ğƭ ǞĻƌƌ ğƭ ƷŷĻ ĭƚƒƦƌĻǣźƷǤ ƚŅ NS O PECIALIZED /ƌźĻƓƷ ƚƩŭğƓźǩğƷźƚƓƭ ƩĻĭĻźǝĻ ƷŷĻ ŭǒźķĻ ƒğķĻ Ʒƚ ķĻƌźǝĻƩ ĭĻƩƷğźƓ ƩĻƭǒƌƷƭ͵ S OFTWARE ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ ĻǝğƌǒğƷźƚƓ ƭǤƭƷĻƒ ğƭ ǞĻƌƌ ğƭ ƷŷĻ ŷĻ YĻǤƭƷƚƓĻ WƚĬ \[ĻǝĻƌźƓŭ ƭƦƩĻğķƭŷĻĻƷ ĭğƌĭǒƌğƷƚƩ ƭƚ ƷŷĻǤ ĭğƓ Ѝ͵ ŷĻ ĻǣƷĻƓƷ Contacts & Interpersonal Skills: {ǤƭƷĻƒ ĭƚƒĻƭ ǞźƷŷ ğ ĭğƌĭǒƌğƷƚƩ ƒğźƓƷğźƓ ƷŷĻźƩ ĻǝğƌǒğƷźƚƓƭ źƓƷĻƩƓğƌƌǤ͵ Ʒƚ Ǟŷźĭŷ ƷŷĻ ǞƚƩƉ źƓǝƚƌǝĻƭ ƒğƉźƓŭ ĭƚƓƷğĭƷƭͲ ƷŷğƷ ĭƚƓǝĻƩƷƭ ƷŷĻ ƌĻǝĻƌƭ hƓĭĻ ƷŷĻ ĻǝğƌǒğƷźƚƓ ƦƩƚĭĻƭƭ źƭ ĭƚƒƒǒƓźĭğƷźƓŭͲ ƓĻŭƚƷźğƷźƓŭͲ ƚƩ źƓŅƌǒĻƓĭźƓŭ ğƭƭźŭƓĻķ Ʒƚ ƦƚźƓƷƭ ŅƚƩ Ļğĭŷ ĭƚƒƦƌĻƷĻͲ ğ ƩĻŭƩĻƭƭźƚƓ ğƓğƌǤƭźƭ ƒğǤ ĬĻ ķĻĭźƭźƚƓΏƒğƉźƓŭ ǞźƷŷ ƦĻƚƦƌĻ źƓƭźķĻ ğƓķ ƚǒƷƭźķĻ ŅğĭƷƚƩ ğƓķ ĭğƌĭǒƌğƷĻƭ ƷŷĻ ƷŷĻ ƚƩŭğƓźǩğƷźƚƓ͵ ǒƭĻķ Ʒƚ ğƭƭźƭƷ ǞźƷŷ ĭƩĻğƷźƓŭ ƭğƌğƩǤ ƩğƓŭĻƭ ƚǝĻƩğƌƌ ƆƚĬ ƦƚźƓƷƭ ğĭĭƚƩķźƓŭƌǤ͵ ĬğƭĻķ ƚƓ ƒğƩƉĻƷ ķğƷğ ğƓķ ƷŷĻ Ў͵ wĻŅĻƩƭ Ʒƚ ĻǣƦƚƭǒƩĻ Ʒƚ Working Conditions: ĻǝğƌǒğƷźƚƓ ƦƚźƓƷƭ͵ ŷĻ ğƓğƌǤƭźƭ ĻƓğĬƌĻƭ ĻǣƷƩĻƒĻ ƷĻƒƦĻƩğƷǒƩĻͲ ǒƓƦƌĻğƭğƓƷ ĭƚƓķźƷźƚƓƭͲ CƚƩ ƒƚƩĻ źƓŅƚƩƒğƷźƚƓͲ ƦƌĻğƭĻ ĭğƌƌ Ļğĭŷ ƚƩŭğƓźǩğƷźƚƓ Ʒƚ ķƚ ĭƚƒƦğƩźƭƚƓƭ ĻǣƦƚƭǒƩĻ Ʒƚ źƓƆǒƩǤͲ ğƓķ ŷĻğƌƷŷ ŷğǩğƩķƭ źƓ ğķķźƷźƚƓ ǒƭ ğƷʹ ЏЊЋ͵БЊЉ͵ЌЎЋЋ ƚƩ ǞźƷŷ ƷŷĻ ƒğƩƉĻƷ ğƓķ ĻǝğƌǒğƷĻ ƷŷĻ ķĻƒğƓķƭ ƷŷğƷ Ʒƚ ƦŷǤƭźĭğƌğƩĻ ƦğƩƷ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ ƩĻŭǒƌğƩ ƚƷğƌƩĻǞğƩķƭθƉĻǤƭƷƚƓĻĭƚƒƦ͵ƓĻƷ ĭƚƒƦĻƷźƷźǝĻƓĻƭƭ ƚŅ ƷŷĻźƩ ƚǝĻƩğƌƌ ƦğǤ ǞƚƩƉ ĻƓǝźƩƚƓƒĻƓƷ͵ ƦƩƚŭƩğƒ͵ ŷĻ ƭǤƭƷĻƒ ğƌƭƚ ŅğĭźƌźƷğƷĻƭ ƷŷĻ ƦƩƚĭĻƭƭ ƚŅ ğƭƭźŭƓźƓŭ ƆƚĬƭ Ʒƚ ğƦƦƩƚƦƩźğƷĻ ŭƩğķĻƭ ǞŷĻƓ ƒğƩƉĻƷ ķğƷğ ğƩĻ ƭĭğƩĭĻ͵ www.keystonecomp.net Page 1 of 1 2/2/2017 3:30:11 PM Page 1 of 1 2/2/2017 3:32:57 PM FundstransferredelectronicallyJanuary18,2017toFebruary7,2017 PAYROLL $ 273,878.49 FIT/FICA87,617.17$ STATEINCOMETAX17,913.24$ PERA83,645.58$ HEALTHCARESAVINGS6,691.70$ HEALTHSAVINGSACC T $6,402.45 NATIONWIDEDEFCOMP11,382.10$ ICMADEFERREDCOMP2,017.54$ MSRS2,822.54$ FSA4,646.06$ MNWAGELEVY$ Total497,016.87$ Update on City-owned Land C B A C CITY OF SHAKOPEE Monthly Financial Report Di YTDDecemberYTDBudget YTD vis 201620162016Balance Percent 2015 io BudgetActualActualRemainingUsedActual n 01000 - GENERAL FUND REVENUES: * - TAXES(17,150,900)(7,868,710)(17,021,316)(129,584)99%(16,160,074) * - SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS(11,500)(17,173)(15,818)4,318138%(12,043) * - LICENSES AND PERMITS(2,269,100)(158,990)(2,560,651)291,551113%(2,023,436) * - INTERGOVERNMENTAL(1,251,900)(74,372)(1,263,240)11,340101%(1,356,734) * - CHARGES FOR SERVICES(4,377,650)(434,029)(4,573,498)195,848104%(4,461,510) * - FINES AND FORFEITS(1,500)(3,710)(11,213)9,713748%(7,093) * - MISCELLANEOUS(198,850)(54,799)(249,418)50,568125%(310,395) TOTAL REVENUES(25,261,400)(8,611,783)(25,695,153)433,753102%(24,331,286) EXPENDITURES: 11 - MAYOR & COUNCIL176,9908,251170,9945,99697%208,849 12 - ADMINISTRATION1,355,860154,7881,388,317(32,457)102%1,096,915 13 - CITY CLERK326,03029,414321,1894,84199%384,513 15 - FINANCE1,154,300136,3921,181,520(27,220)102%1,123,583 17 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT501,72047,128458,83542,88591%475,453 18 - FACILITIES363,81047,317360,4783,33299%378,072 31 - POLICE DEPARTMENT7,750,810724,3097,703,60447,20699%7,527,530 32 - FIRE2,059,380201,8752,070,664(11,284)101%2,096,522 33 - INSPECTION-BLDG-PLMBG-HTG606,91081,415701,553(94,643)116%645,720 41 - ENGINEERING627,34046,770608,14919,19197%642,942 42 - STREET MAINTENANCE1,934,790318,9211,996,967(62,177)103%2,001,289 44 - FLEET403,31037,136431,269(27,959)107%392,053 46 - PARK MAINTENANCE1,570,640145,2661,565,1075,533100%1,572,214 66 - NATURAL RESOURCES200,4107,177143,13957,27171%106,458 67 - RECREATION2,462,810299,8892,443,00219,80899%2,238,397 91 - UNALLOCATED217,5804,94839,882177,69818%173,247 TOTAL EXPENDITURES21,712,6902,290,99721,584,671128,01999%21,063,757 OTHER FINANCING # * - TRANSFERS IN(250,000)0(250,000)0100%(250,000) # * - TRANSFERS OUT3,345,00002,103,7551,241,24663%3,515,466 # OTHER FINANCING TOTAL3,095,00001,853,7551,241,24660%3,265,466 # FUND TOTAL(453,710)(6,320,786)(2,256,728)1,803,018(2,063) # Key Varies more than 10% than budget positively Varies more than 10% than budget negatively Within 10% of budget 2/2/2017 1:53:34 PMPage 1 of 1 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Monthly Financial Report Di YTDJanuaryYTDBudget January YTD vis 201720172017Balance Percent 2016 io BudgetActualActualRemainingUsedActual n 01000 - GENERAL FUND REVENUES: * - TAXES(16,568,400)00(16,568,400)0%0 * - SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS(12,000)17,19517,195(29,195)(143)%0 * - LICENSES AND PERMITS(1,683,400)(60,875)(60,875)(1,622,525)4%(44,843) * - INTERGOVERNMENTAL(1,287,100)(375)(375)(1,286,725)0%9,917 * - CHARGES FOR SERVICES(4,937,400)(589,739)(589,608)(4,347,792)12%(423,018) * - FINES AND FORFEITS(1,500)(300)(300)(1,200)20%(500) * - MISCELLANEOUS(213,400)(8,942)(6,460)(206,940)3%(13,688) TOTAL REVENUES(24,703,200)(643,035)(640,423)(24,062,777)3%(472,132) EXPENDITURES: 11 - MAYOR & COUNCIL197,90018,54349,506148,39425%15,124 12 - ADMINISTRATION1,707,00093,90399,7791,607,2216%67,677 13 - CITY CLERK318,00015,75215,793302,2075%17,327 15 - FINANCE1,207,90028,65032,7131,175,1873%31,442 17 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT586,80027,65727,749559,0515%28,659 18 - FACILITIES384,80012,19519,162365,6385%26,338 31 - POLICE DEPARTMENT7,980,000432,364495,6407,484,3606%531,366 32 - FIRE2,160,40063,856103,0212,057,3795%96,479 33 - INSPECTION-BLDG-PLMBG-HTG796,20054,56260,470735,7308%36,782 41 - ENGINEERING786,20025,71437,556748,6445%45,842 42 - STREET MAINTENANCE2,151,10088,70994,7092,056,3914%106,622 44 - FLEET435,00026,40126,426408,5746%26,334 46 - PARK MAINTENANCE1,936,30052,37356,7901,879,5103%75,126 66 - NATURAL RESOURCES198,0005,0905,090192,9103%8,018 67 - RECREATION3,190,000106,346129,4933,060,5074%120,883 91 - UNALLOCATED217,600471,202216,3981%(9,431) TOTAL EXPENDITURES24,253,2001,052,1611,255,09922,998,1015%1,224,588 OTHER FINANCING # * - TRANSFERS IN(250,000)00(250,000)0%0 # * - TRANSFERS OUT700,00000700,0000%0 # OTHER FINANCING TOTAL450,00000450,0000%0 # FUND TOTAL0408,839614,389(614,389)752,456 # Key Varies more than 10% than budget positively Varies more than 10% than budget negatively Within 10% of budget 2/2/2017 2:33:35 PMPage 1 of 1 Shakopee,MN Community Livability Report 2016 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301Washington, DC 20002 n-r-c.com • 303-444-7863icma.org • 800-745-8780 Contents About..............................................................................................1 Quality of Life in Shakopee...............................................................2 Community Characteristics...............................................................3 Governance.....................................................................................5 Participation....................................................................................7 Special Topics..................................................................................9 Conclusions...................................................................................13 The National Citizen Survey™ © 2001-2017National Research Center, Inc. The NCS™ is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA. NRC is a chartermember of the AAPOR Transparency Initiative, providing clear disclosure of our sound and ethical survey research practices. About The National Citizen Survey™ (The NCS) report is about the “livability” of Shakopee. The phrase “livable community” is used here to evoke a place that is not simply habitable,but that is desirable. It is not only where people do live, but where they want tolive. Great communities arepartnerships of the government, private sector, community-based organizations and residents, all geographically Residents connected. The NCS captures residents’ opinions within the three pillars of a community (Community Characteristics, Governance and Participation) across eight central facets of community (Safety, Mobility, Natural Environment, Built Environment, Economy, Communities Recreation and Wellness, Education and are Community- Enrichment and Community Engagement). Private based partnerships sector organizations The Community Livability Report provides the among... opinions of a representative sample of 410 residents of the Cityof Shakopee. The margin of error around any reported percentage is 5% for the entire sample.The full description of methods used to garner these opinions can be found in the Technical Appendicesprovided under separate Government cover. 1 Quality of Life in Shakopee Mostresidents ratedthe quality of life in Shakopeeas excellent or Overall Quality of Life good.This rating was similar to the national benchmark(see Appendix B of the Technical Appendicesprovided under separate cover). Excellent 14% Shown below are the eight facets of community. The color of each Good community facet summarizes how residents rated it across the three 67% sections of the survey that represent the pillars of a community – Poor Community Characteristics, Governance and Participation. When most 3% ratings across the three pillars were higher than the benchmark, the color for that facet is the darkest shade; when most ratings were lower Fair than the benchmark, the color is the lightest shade. A mix of ratings 16% (higher and lower than the benchmark) results in a color between the extremes. In addition to a summary of ratings, the image below includes one or more stars to indicate which community facets were the most important focus areas for the community. Residents identified Safety and Economyas priorities for the Shakopeecommunity in the coming two years.Ratings for all facets were positive and similar to other communities.This overview of the key aspects of community quality provides a quick summary of where residents see exceptionally strong performance and where performance offers the greatest opportunity for improvement. Linking quality to importance offers community members and leaders a view into the characteristics of the community that matter most and that seem to be working best. Details that support these findings are contained in the remainder of this Livability Report, starting with the ratings for Community Characteristics, Governance and Participation and ending with results for Shakopee’s unique questions. Legend Higher than national benchmark Similarto national benchmark Lowerthan national benchmark Most important Education Built Safetyand Environment Enrichment Natural Recreation Environment and Wellness Community Mobility Economy Engagement 2 The National Citizen Survey™ Community Characteristics Overall quality of community life represents the natural ambience, services and amenities that make for an attractive community. How residents rate their overall quality of life is an indicator ofthe overall health of a community. In the case of Shakopee, 85%rated the Cityas an excellent or good place to live.Respondents’ ratings of Shakopeeas a place to live were similar toratings in other communities across the nation. In addition to rating the Cityas a place to live, respondents rated several aspects of community quality including Shakopeeas a place to raise children and to retire, their neighborhood as a place to live, the overall image or reputation of Shakopeeand its overall appearance. About three-quarters of residents gave excellent or good ratings to their neighborhoods and Shakopee as a place to raise children. Around 6 in 10 gave favorable ratings to Shakopee’s overall appearance, while about half positively rated Shakopee as a place to retireand the City’s overall image. All of these aspects of community livability were similar to the national comparison, with the exception of the overall image of the City, which was lower than what isseen in comparison communities. Delving deeper into Community Characteristics, survey respondents rated over 40 features of the community within the eight facetsof Community Livability. Overall, results were similar to other communities and most aspects had positive ratings from a majority of respondents. Around 9 in 10 residents reported feeling safe in their neighborhoods and in the downtown/commercial area of Shakopee. Within Mobility, about 7 in 10 respondents or more rated ease of travel by car, public parking and traffic flow as excellent or good, and all of these aspects were higher than the national benchmark. At least 7 in 10 respondents ratedallaspects of Natural Environment in Shakopee favorably, while at least a majority of residents rated all Place to Live aspects of Built Environment and Recreation and Wellness favorably. Aspects of Economy tended to be similar to the benchmark but varied; ratings ranged from 32% excellent or good (vibrancy of the Excellent downtown/commercial area) to 69% (Shakopee as a place to visit). 24% Employment opportunities in the City (63% excellent or good) were rated higher than ratings in comparison communities. Of the Good 61% remaining facets, all aspects received positive ratings that were similar Poor 5% to communities elsewhere with the exception of opportunities to attendcultural, arts and musical activities, which was rated positively Fair by around 4 in 10 residents and was lower than thenational 10% comparison. Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good) Comparison to national benchmark HigherSimilarLower 79% 77% 68% 56% 52% Overall imageNeighborhoodPlace to raise childrenPlace to retireOverall appearance 3 The National Citizen Survey™ Figure 1: Aspects of Community Characteristics SAFETY Overall feeling of safety 79% Safe in neighborhood 92% Safe downtown/commercial area 89% MOBILITY Overall ease of travel 80% Comparison to national Paths and walking trails 69% benchmark Ease of walking 65% HigherSimilarLower Travel by bicycle 59% Travel by public transportation 38% Travel by car 83% Public parking 73% Traffic flow 73% NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Overall natural environment 76% Cleanliness 78% Air quality 78% BUILT ENVIRONMENT Overall built environment 61% New development in Shakopee 63% Affordable quality housing 55% Housing options 63% Public places 62% ECONOMY Overall economic health 66% Vibrant downtown/commercial area 32% Business and services 57% Cost of living 51% Shopping opportunities 45% Employment opportunities 63% Place to visit 69% Place to work 61% RECREATION AND WELLNESS Health and wellness 73% Mental health care 57% Preventive health services 76% Health care 75% Food 59% Recreational opportunities 68% Fitness opportunities 62% EDUCATION AND ENRICHMENT Education and enrichment opportunities 66% Religious or spiritual events and activities 69% Cultural/arts/music activities 41% Adult education 51% K-12 education 70% Child care/preschool 55% COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Social events and activities 47% Neighborliness 54% Openness and acceptance 58% Opportunities to participate in community matters 51% Opportunities to volunteer 59% 4 Governance The overall quality of the services provided by Shakopeeas well as the manner in which these services are provided are a key component of how residents rate their quality of life. The overall quality of services provided by the City of Shakopee received excellent or good ratings by about 7 in 10 residents, while theservices provided by theFederal Government received positive ratings from about half of respondents. Both of these ratings were similar to the national benchmark. Survey respondents also rated various aspects of Shakopee’s leadership and governance. Around three-quarters of residents gave favorable ratings to the overall customer service provided by Shakopee employees. At least a majority of residents positively rated the overall direction that the City was taking, confidence in City government, the government acting in the best interest of Shakopee, being honest and the government treating all residents fairly. All aspects measuring government performance were rated similarly to the national benchmark. Respondents evaluated over 30 individual services and amenities available in Shakopee.Most services and amenities were rated positively by at least half of respondents and all were similar to or higher than the national benchmark comparisons. The highest rated services within the facet of Safety were police (85% excellent or good), fire services (91%) and fire prevention (82%). Theseaspects were all similar to the national benchmark. About 8 in 10 residents positively rated garbage collection, recycling, storm drainage, sewer services and City parks. These ratings as well as the remaining services all received ratings similar to the national benchmark with the exception of storm drainage,which was rated higher than in other communities across the nation. Overall Quality of City Services Excellent 17% Poor 5% Good 53% Fair 25% Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good) Comparison to national benchmark HigherSimilarLower 73% 61% 58% 55% 55% 53% 48% 49% 47% Value ofOverallWelcomingConfidenceActing in theBeing honestTreating allCustomerServices services fordirectioncitizenin Citybest interestresidentsserviceprovided by taxes paidinvolvementgovernmentof Shakopeefairlythe Federal Government 5 The National Citizen Survey™ Figure 2: Aspects of Governance SAFETY Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good) Police 85% Fire 91% Crime prevention 75% Comparison to national benchmark Fire prevention 82% HigherAnimal control 69% Emergency preparedness 58% Similar MOBILITY Lower Traffic enforcement 74% Street repair 56% Street cleaning 74% Street lighting 58% Snow removal 73% Sidewalk maintenance 68% Traffic signal timing 59% NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Garbage collection 84% Recycling 84% Open space 59% BUILT ENVIRONMENT Storm drainage 83% Sewer services 82% Land use, planning and zoning 49% Code enforcement 52% Cable television 46% ECONOMY Economic development 66% RECREATION AND WELLNESS City parks 82% Recreation programs 69% Recreation centers 66% EDUCATION AND ENRICHMENT Special events 57% COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Public information 61% 6 Participation An engaged community harnessesits most valuable resource, its residents.The connections and trust among residents, government, businesses and other organizations helpto create a sense of community,a shared sense of membership, belonging and history. Around half of residents gave a positive rating to the overall sense of community in Shakopee and this level was similar to what was seen inotherbenchmark communitiesnationwide. More than four in five residents reported that they would recommend Shakopee to others and that they would remain in Shakopee for the next five years, and about 4 in 10 residents reported that they had contacted a City employee in the last 12 months. All of these ratings were similar to the national benchmark. The survey included over 30 activities and behaviors for which respondents indicated how often they participated in or performed each, if at all. Rates of Participation were mixed across the different facets; however, most rates of Participation were similar to other benchmark communities. Almost all residents had purchased goods or services in Shakopee and about 9 in 10 reported that theyhad not beenthe victim of a crime, recycled at home and they had talked to or visited with neighborsin the 12 months prior to the survey. About 8 in 10 respondents indicated that they had not reporteda crime, conserved water, visited a City park, ate 5portions of fruit or vegetables a day, participated in moderate or vigorous activity, read or watched the local news and voted in local elections. These levels were similar to the national benchmark. Meanwhile, Shakopee residents were less likely to report that they had stocked supplies for an emergency, used public transportation instead of driving and attended a City- sponsored event compared to those in other communities. However, the proportion of respondents who reported that they had not observed a code Sense of Community violation in the past 12 months was higher than the national benchmark. Excellent 8% Good Poor 45% 11% Fair 36% Comparison to national Percent rating positively benchmark (e.g., very/somewhat likely, yes) HigherSimilarLower 84% 83% 41% RecommendRemain in ShakopeeContacted Shakopee Shakopeeemployees 7 The National Citizen Survey™ Figure 3: Aspects of Participation Percent rating positively SAFETY (e.g., yes, more than Stocked supplies for an emergency 21% once a month, Did NOT report a crime 83% always/sometimes) Was NOT the victim of a crime 91% Comparison to national MOBILITY benchmark Used public transportation instead of driving 14% Higher Carpooled instead of driving alone 39% Walked or biked instead of driving 53% Similar NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Lower Conserved water 80% Made home more energy efficient 78% Recycled at home 95% BUILT ENVIRONMENT Did NOT observe a code violation 65% NOT under housing cost stress 69% ECONOMY Purchased goods or services in Shakopee 94% Economy will have positive impact on income 30% Work in Shakopee 40% RECREATION AND WELLNESS Used Shakopee recreation centers 52% Visited a City park 87% Ate 5 portions of fruits and vegetables 83% Participated in moderate or vigorous physical activity 80% In very good to excellent health 72% EDUCATION AND ENRICHMENT Used Shakopee public libraries 59% Participated in religious or spiritual activities 40% Attended a City-sponsored event 41% COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Campaigned for an issue, cause or candidate 19% Contacted Shakopee elected officials 13% Volunteered 31% Participated in a club 19% Talked to or visited with neighbors 91% Done a favor for a neighbor 76% Attended a local public meeting 16% Watched a local public meeting 21% Read or watched local news 86% Voted in local elections 86% 8 Special Topics The Cityof Shakopeeincluded several questions of special interest on The NCS. An additional lineitem asked residents about how often they visited downtown Shakopee. More than 4 in 10 residents reported visiting the downtown Shakopee areaat leastoncein the 12 months prior to the survey. Figure 4: Question 8 Additional Line Item -Visited Downtown Shakopee 2 times a week or more2-4 times a monthOnce a month or less Visited downtown Shakopee 13% 33%48% The next special interest question inquired aboutthe quality of services provided by Scott County. About two- thirds of survey participants rated the quality of services provide by Scott County as excellent or good. Figure 5: Question 11 Additional Line Item -Quality of Services Provided by ScottCounty ExcellentGood Scott County Government 18%50%68% 9 The City also asked residents about the City’s approach for theenforcement of residential property codes. About four in five respondents indicated that they at least somewhat supported a more active/strong approach from the City towards enforcement of residential property codes. Figure 6: City Residential Property Code Enforcement Strongly support 34% Strongly oppose 4% Somewhat support 53% Somewhat oppose 9% Participants were also asked to respond to what would attract them downtown Shakopee more often. About 4 in 10 residents would go to downtown more often if there were more restaurants and slightly fewer reported that retail would attract them to downtown. Less than 1 in 10 residents chose public amenities as an item that would attract them todowntown. Figure 7: Attraction to Downtown Shakopee Restaurants 41% Retail 39% Public events 14% Public amenities 6% 10 The National Citizen Survey™ Residents reported using a variety of sources for information about the City. Most residents said that they had used the City website, Shakopee Valley News and the City Newsletter as a major or minor source of information. The least cited sources of information included the Star Tribune, talking with City officialsand the local government cable channel. Figure 8: Sources of Information Major sourceMinor sourceNot a source City website (www.ShakopeeMN.gov) 57%30%12% Shakopee Valley News 49%37%14% City Newsletter (Hometown Messenger/Parks 35%48%17% and Recreation Activity Brochure) Word-of-mouth 27%50%22% Email (E-News, eNotifications) 23%41%36% City communications via social media 32% 23%45% Star Tribune 17%33%51% Talking with City officials 14%34%52% Local government cable channel (Comcast 9%30%61% 16/CenturyLink 240) 11 The National Citizen Survey™ The final special interest question asked participants to rate the importance of several City issues. A majorityrated redeveloping downtown and enhancement and preservation of natural resources and open space within the City as essential or very important. Figure 9: Importance of Addressing City Projects EssentialVery important Redeveloping downtown 33%33%65% Enhancement and preservation of natural resources and 39%58% 19% open space within the City Improving access to public transportation 21%27%48% Construction of a third Fire Station to improve fire and 30%44% 14% emergency response times Improving the riverfront at Huber Park 16%24%40% 12 Conclusions Shakopee residents enjoy a high quality of life. Most respondents rated the overall quality of life in Shakopeeand the City as a place to live as excellent or good. About 4 in 5 respondentssaid they would recommend living in Shakopeeto someone who asked and planned to remain living in Shakopeefor the next five years. Ratings for features that enhance quality of life, such as Shakopee as a place to raise children and their neighborhoods as placesto live were given positive ratings by about three-quarters or more of residents. Additionally, a majority of residents rated Shakopee’s sense of community as excellent or good. The Economy is a top priority for residents. Residents indicated that Economy was an important issue for the community to address in the next two years, and ratings within this facet varied across the three pillars of community livability. About6 in 10respondents or more gave high marks to the overall economic health of Shakopee, new development in Shakopee, employment opportunities, Shakopee as a place to visit and a place to work. Theseratings were all strong and similar toratings given inother communities, with the exception of employment opportunities which was higher than the national comparison. However, about one-thirdofparticipants gave favorable ratings to the vibrancy of Shakopee’s downtown/commercial area,which waslower than ratings seen in comparison communities. Almost all respondents had purchased goods or services in Shakopee, and about 4 in 10 reported working in the City. Safety is an important and positive feature of the community. Respondents also indicated that Safety was an important area for the community to focus on in the coming two years, and ratingswithin this facet were generally positive and similar to those given in other communities. About 9 in 10 respondents reported feeling safe in their neighborhoods, and 8 in 10 positively rated the overall feeling of safety in the City. At least 8 in 10 participants gave high marks to police, fire, and fire prevention services; ratings for all Safety-related services were similar to ratings seen in other communities nationwide. Additionally, about 4 in 5 participants had not reported a crime and about 9 in 10 had not been the victim of a crime in the 12 months prior to the survey. 13 Shakopee,MN Dashboard Summary of Findings 2016 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301Washington,DC 20002 n-r-c.com • 303-444-7863icma.org • 800-745-8780 Summary The National Citizen Survey™ (The NCS™) is a collaborative effort between National Research Center, Inc. (NRC) and the International City/County Management Association (ICMA). The survey and its administration are standardized to assure high quality research methods and directly comparable results across The NCS communities. The NCS captures residents’ opinions within the three pillars of a community(Community Characteristics, Governance and Participation)across eight central facets of community (Safety, Mobility, Natural Environment, Built Environment, Economy, Recreation and Wellness, Education and Enrichment and Community Engagement). This report summarizes Shakopee’s performance in the eight facets of community livability with the “General” rating as a summary of results from the overarching questions not shown within any of the eight facets. The “Overall” represents the community pillar in its entirety (the eight facets and general). By summarizing resident ratings across the eight facets and three pillars of a livable community, a pictureof Shakopee’s community livability emerges. Below, the color of each community facet summarizes how residents rated each of the pillars that support it –Community Characteristics, Governance and Participation. When most ratings were higher than the benchmark, the color is the darkest shade; when most ratings were lower than the benchmark, the color is the lightest shade. A mix of ratings (higher and lower than the benchmark) results in a color between the extremes. Broadly, Shakopee residents tended to give positive ratings to most aspects of community livability and these ratings were similar to ratings given in comparison communities. However, levels of Participation in Built Environment tended to be higher in Shakopee than seen elsewhere. Figure 1: Dashboard Summary Community CharacteristicsGovernanceParticipation HigherSimilarLowerHigherSimilarLowerHigherSimilarLower Overall445313601323 General061030030 Safety030060021 Mobility350070021 Natural Environment030030030 Built Environment050140110 Economy161010030 Recreation and Wellness070030050 Education and Enrichment051010021 Community Engagement0500800110 Legend Higher Similar Lower 1 The National Citizen Survey™ Figure 2: Detailed Dashboard Percent Percent Percent Community CharacteristicsBenchmarkGovernanceBenchmarkParticipationBenchmark positivepositivepositive Overall appearance68%Customer service73%Recommend Shakopee84% Overall quality of life81%Services provided by Shakopee71%Remain in Shakopee83% General Place to retire52%Services provided by the Federal 49%Contacted Shakopee employees41% Government Place to raise children77% Place to live85% Neighborhood79% Overall image56% Overall feeling of safety79%Police85%Was NOT the victim of a crime91% Safety Safe in neighborhood92%Crime prevention75%Did NOT report a crime83% Safe downtown/commercial area89%Fire91%Stocked supplies for an emergency21% Fire prevention82% Emergency preparedness58% Animal control69% Traffic flow73%Traffic enforcement74%Carpooled instead of driving alone39% Travel by car83%Street repair56%Walked or biked instead of driving53% Mobility Travel by bicycle59%Street cleaning74%Used public transportation instead 14% of driving Ease of walking65%Street lighting58% Travel by public transportation38%Snow removal73% Overall ease of travel80%Sidewalk maintenance68% Public parking73%Traffic signal timing59% Paths and walking trails69% Environment Natural Overall natural environment76%Garbage collection84%Recycled at home95% Air quality78%Recycling84%Conserved water80% Cleanliness78%Open space59%Made home more energy efficient78% New development in Shakopee63%Sewer services82%NOT experiencing housing cost 69% Environment stress Built Affordable quality housing55%Storm drainage83%Did NOT observe a code violation65% Housing options63%Land use, planning and zoning49% Overall built environment61%Code enforcement52% Public places62%Cable television46% Legend Much higherHigherSimilarLowerMuch lower*Not available 2 The National Citizen Survey™ Percent Percent Percent Community CharacteristicsBenchmarkGovernanceBenchmarkParticipationBenchmark positivepositivepositive Overall economic health66%Economic development66%Economy will have positive impact on 30% income Shopping opportunities45%Purchased goods or services in 94% Economy Shakopee Employment opportunities63%Work in Shakopee40% Place tovisit69% Cost of living51% Vibrant downtown/commercial area32% Place to work61% Business and services57% Recreation and Fitness opportunities62%City parks82%In very good to excellent health72% Recreational opportunities68%Recreation centers66%Used Shakopee recreation centers52% Wellness Health care75%Recreation programs69%Visited a City park87% Food59%Ate 5 portions of fruits and vegetables83% Mental health care57%Participated in moderate or vigorous 80% physical activity Health and wellness73% Preventive health services76% Education and K-12 education70%Special events57%Used Shakopee public libraries59% Enrichment Cultural/arts/music activities41%Participated in religious or spiritual 40% activities Child care/preschool55%Attended a City-sponsored event41% Religious or spiritual events and 69% activities Adult education51% Overall education and enrichment66% Opportunities to participate in 51%Public information61%Sense of community53% community matters Community Engagement Opportunities to volunteer59%Overall direction61%Voted in local elections86% Openness and acceptance58%Value of services for taxes paid47%Talked to or visited with neighbors91% Social events and activities47%Welcoming citizen involvement48%Attended a local public meeting16% Neighborliness54%Confidence in City government53%Watched a local public meeting21% Acting in the best interest of 55%Volunteered31% Shakopee Being honest55%Participated in a club19% Treating all residents fairly58%Campaigned for an issue, cause or 19% candidate Contacted Shakopee elected officials13% Read or watched local news86% Done a favor for a neighbor76% Legend Much higherHigherSimilarLowerMuch lower*Not available 3 Shakopee,MN Comparisons by DemographicSubgroups 2016 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301Washington, DC 20002 n-r-c.com • 303-444-7863icma.org • 800-745-8780 Summary The National Citizen Survey™ (The NCS™) is a collaborative effort between National Research Center, Inc. (NRC) and the International City/County Management Association (ICMA). The survey and its administration are standardized to assure high quality researchmethods and directly comparable results across The NCS communities. This report discussesdifferences in opinion of survey respondents byage, sex, race/ethnicity, housing tenure (rent or own) and housing unit type (detached or attached). Responses in the following tables show only the proportion of respondents giving a certain answer; for example, the percent of respondents who rated the quality of life as “excellent” or “good,” or the percent of respondents who attended a public meeting more than once a month.ANOVA and chi-square tests of significance were applied to these comparisons of survey questions. A “p-value” of 0.05 or less indicates that there is less than a 5% probability that differences observed between subgroups are due to chance; or in other words, a greater than 95% probability that the differences observed are “real.” Where differences were statistically significant, they have been shaded grey. The margin of error for this report is generally no greater than plus or minus fivepercentage points around any given percent reported for the entire sample (410completed surveys). For subgroups of responses, the margin of error increases because the sample size for the subgroup is smaller. For subgroups of approximately 100 respondents, the margin of error is plus or minus 10 percentage points. Notable differences between demographic subgroupsincluded the following: Within the pillar of Community Characteristics, residents who were female,identified as white alone, not Hispanic, owned their homes or lived in detached housing tended to rate their neighborhood as a place to live higher than their peers. Similarly, residents who were white alone, not Hispanic, owned their homes or lived in detached housing rated Shakopee as a place to live more favorably than their counterparts. Where difference where significant, renters tended to rate aspects of Safety less positivelythan those who owned their homes. Residents who were 35 and older, who identified as Hispanic and/or another race, who rented or lived in attached housing tended to rate the cleanliness of Shakopee less favorably than their peers. Resident opinion by demographic groups tended to vary across facets of Governance. Where differences were significant, younger residents between the ages of 18-34 tended to rate general aspects of Governance higher than older residents. Meanwhile, residents who were 55 or older tended to rate aspects of Natural Environment such as garbage collection and recycling more favorably than younger residents. Residents identifying as White alone, not Hispanic, who owned their homes or lived in detached housing tended to give higher ratings to economic development than those identifying as Hispanic and/or other race, who rented or lived in attached housing. Several significant differences were noted among resident Participation in City events or activities. White alone, not Hispanic residents who owned their home or lived in detached housing were more likely to report they would recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asked. Residents who were between the ages of 35-54 or who were female tended to report they had been thevictim of a crime more so than their counterparts. Younger residents between the ages of 18-34 were significantly less likely to have observed a code violation compared to older residents. Hispanic and/or other raceidentifying residents or those who were between the ages of 35-54 were more likely to report they worked in Shakopee compared to their peers. Homeowners were more likely to have reported engaging with the community than were renters, where significance was noted. Hispanic and/or other race respondents tended to rate the quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee, health and wellness opportunities in the City and sense of community as important community focus areas more so than their counterparts. Female residents or those who rented their home tended to provide more support for the City enforcing residential property codes than their male or home-owning counterparts. Additionally, females tended to place higher importance than their male peers on improving access to public transportation and construction of a third Fire Station to improve fire and emergency response times, as it related to addressing City projects in the next five years. 1 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 1: Community Characteristics -General Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or other excellent/good)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicraceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall The overall quality of life in Shakopee85%81%77%85%78%84%70%76%82%85%76%81% Overall image or reputation of Shakopee49%58%62%58%53%57%51%56%55%55%57%56% Shakopee as a place to live86%85%84%87%83%88%74%71%89%90%78%85% Your neighborhood as a place to live78%78%82%83%75%81%71%67%82%88%65%79% Shakopee as a place to raise children73%78%81%79%75%79%69%58%81%85%63%77% Shakopee as a place to retire60%41%62%54%49%51%55%51%52%51%53%52% Overall appearance of Shakopee69%65%71%69%66%72%49%50%72%74%59%68% Table 2: Community Characteristics -Safety Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or very/somewhat safe)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee82%77%79%80%80%80%76%71%81%81%77%79% In your neighborhood during the day97%90%88%93%92%93%92%90%93%94%90%92% In Shakopee's downtown/commercial areas during the day90%89%89%89%91%90%85%81%91%91%86%89% Table 3: Community Characteristics -Mobility Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or very/somewhat safe)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit81%78%83%80%79%81%76%71%82%83%75%80% Traffic flow on major streets81%65%75%74%71%74%65%64%75%78%65%73% Ease of public parking79%70%69%71%74%76%61%59%76%77%67%73% Ease of travel by car in Shakopee87%79%83%83%82%88%64%62%88%90%72%83% Ease of travel by public transportation in Shakopee32%43%36%36%39%43%24%26%42%44%27%38% Ease of travel by bicycle in Shakopee56%59%63%66%52%59%58%61%58%63%53%59% Ease of walking in Shakopee61%67%72%70%61%68%57%54%69%72%55%65% Availability of paths and walking trails69%66%77%73%65%73%55%62%71%75%61%69% 2 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 4: Community Characteristics -Natural Environment Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or very/somewhat safe)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee78%72%82%82%71%78%69%77%76%79%72%76% Air quality81%77%77%78%78%82%63%66%81%83%71%78% Cleanliness of Shakopee84%72%79%79%76%80%68%69%80%83%70%78% Table 5: Community Characteristics -Built Environment Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, 18-35-White alone, Hispanic and/or very/somewhat safe)345455+FemaleMalenot Hispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including overall design, buildings, parks and transportation systems)61%60%63%65%57%63%51%58%61%62%60%61% Public places where people want to spend time61%61%71%67%59%65%54%56%64%66%58%62% Variety of housing options68%61%60%60%66%65%55%40%69%70%54%63% Availability of affordable quality housing63%53%45%50%60%60%35%21%64%66%39%55% Overall quality of new development in Shakopee69%62%55%65%63%64%58%52%65%65%60%63% Table 6: Community Characteristics -Economy Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or very/somewhat safe)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Overall economic health of Shakopee66%68%65%67%66%70%53%62%67%68%63%66% Shakopee as a place to work48%63%80%70%53%66%46%61%61%61%62%61% Shakopee as a place to visit65%70%73%75%63%69%66%77%66%68%70%69% Employment opportunities62%61%70%61%65%67%49%50%67%70%53%63% Shopping opportunities49%39%51%42%50%46%40%42%46%44%46%45% Cost of living in Shakopee58%52%39%49%54%56%36%37%55%57%43%51% Overall quality of business and service establishments in Shakopee63%54%54%57%57%59%47%57%57%59%53%57% Vibrant downtown/commercial areas30%34%33%31%34%35%20%31%33%34%29%32% 3 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 7: Community Characteristics -Recreation and Wellness Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or very/somewhat safe)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee69%74%77%81%66%75%63%67%74%74%71%73% Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.)62%61%65%66%58%64%53%59%63%66%57%62% Recreational opportunities68%67%70%68%68%73%48%65%69%71%63%68% Availability of affordable quality food62%54%62%61%56%62%46%54%60%60%57%59% Availability ofaffordable quality health care74%75%73%78%72%78%62%63%78%82%63%75% Availability of preventive health services80%74%74%77%75%79%65%67%78%79%71%76% Availability of affordable quality mental health care66%51%57%57%56%61%40%51%58%63%49%57% Table 8: Community Characteristics -Education and Enrichment Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or very/somewhat safe)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Overall opportunities for education and enrichment67%61%72%68%63%70%47%63%66%66%64%66% Availability of affordable quality child care/preschool52%55%65%60%50%58%50%51%56%60%47%55% K-12 education67%70%73%73%67%74%55%55%73%74%62%70% Adult educational opportunities52%48%56%51%53%53%44%55%50%55%46%51% Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities43%42%38%40%44%42%38%30%44%45%36%41% Opportunities to participate in religious or spiritual events and activities70%63%79%65%71%74%47%63%70%72%63%69% Table 9: Community Characteristics -Community Engagement Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or very/somewhat safe)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Opportunities to participate in social events and activities38%49%55%46%47%50%31%32%50%53%37%47% Opportunities to volunteer46%58%75%57%60%64%36%40%63%64%50%59% Opportunities to participate in community matters42%54%58%46%57%56%33%31%56%54%46%51% Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds66%54%54%57%59%60%52%45%61%62%52%58% Neighborliness of residents in Shakopee51%55%57%56%51%55%51%43%56%61%43%54% 4 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 10: Governance -General Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall The City of Shakopee73%68%75%76%65%74%60%64%73%75%65%71% The value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee57%40%49%50%46%50%38%47%47%50%43%47% The overall direction that Shakopee is taking71%56%54%65%57%62%57%58%62%65%55%61% The job Shakopee government does at welcoming citizen involvement51%43%59%50%46%51%39%45%49%49%48%48% Overall confidence in Shakopee government65%46%51%62%46%52%61%67%50%53%55%53% Generally acting in the best interest of the community74%43%54%60%51%57%52%60%54%57%53%55% Being honest65%48%54%59%50%57%48%59%54%56%54%55% Treating all residents fairly72%48%57%59%57%61%48%56%58%62%52%58% Overall customer service by Shakopee employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.)74%70%81%75%71%79%50%60%76%78%65%73% The Federal Government54%43%52%61%36%45%59%49%48%47%50%49% Scott County Government69%68%68%78%59%70%65%66%69%69%67%68% Table 11: Governance -Safety Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type 18-35-White alone, Hispanic and/or Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good)345455+FemaleMalenot Hispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Police services83%84%91%86%84%88%73%71%89%92%74%85% Fire services85%91%98%92%89%95%77%74%95%97%81%91% Crime prevention76%70%81%72%76%77%65%68%76%76%72%75% Fire prevention and education87%79%85%83%81%84%75%70%85%86%77%82% Animal control77%69%61%70%69%69%74%73%68%71%66%69% Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations)60%53%67%58%58%62%46%47%61%66%47%58% Table 12: Governance -Mobility Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or other excellent/good)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicraceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Traffic enforcement90%65%70%81%67%75%69%79%73%77%69%74% Street repair64%49%58%54%57%56%52%38%59%59%49%56% Street cleaning78%71%72%79%68%74%73%70%74%74%72%74% Street lighting55%56%66%61%55%61%47%53%59%62%51%58% 5 The National Citizen Survey™ Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or other excellent/good)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicraceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Snow removal75%68%81%75%72%77%60%69%74%76%69%73% Sidewalk maintenance75%65%67%70%67%73%54%62%71%72%63%68% Traffic signal timing70%51%58%64%56%60%56%56%60%61%56%59% Table 13: Governance -Natural Environment Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or other excellent/good)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicraceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Garbage collection79%84%92%86%83%86%74%78%85%86%80%84% Recycling80%83%94%88%81%85%82%86%83%84%84%84% Shakopee open space63%59%56%60%59%61%55%50%61%63%54%59% Table 14: Governance -Built Environment Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or other excellent/good)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicraceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Storm drainage91%77%85%85%83%85%78%83%83%87%76%83% Sewer services81%81%88%84%82%86%69%69%85%89%71%82% Land use, planning and zoning52%48%48%55%45%51%43%49%49%51%46%49% Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.)63%47%47%52%51%51%56%59%50%49%57%52% Cable television51%42%47%45%48%50%33%41%47%46%46%46% Table 15: Governance -Economy Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or other excellent/good)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicraceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Economic development66%66%65%64%67%69%54%51%69%71%57%66% 6 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 16: Governance -Recreation and Wellness Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or other excellent/good)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicraceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall City parks78%83%88%83%81%84%73%68%85%86%75%82% Recreation programs or classes63%68%83%70%68%70%64%62%71%74%62%69% Recreation centers or facilities61%66%74%67%63%68%58%57%68%71%58%66% Table 17: Governance -Education and Enrichment Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or other excellent/good)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicraceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall City-sponsored special events62%55%54%58%55%58%53%49%58%62%49%57% Table 18: Governance -Community Engagement Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or other excellent/good)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicraceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Public information services64%59%64%61%61%63%56%49%64%67%52%61% Table 19: Participation General Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, more 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or than once a month, yes)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Sense of community52%53%55%57%50%56%40%56%52%55%51%53% Recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks87%84%82%86%83%89%68%67%89%89%78%84% Remain in Shakopee for the next five years80%87%80%85%81%84%80%67%87%89%74%83% Contacted the City of Shakopee (in-person, phone, email or web) for help or information36%42%49%44%39%39%49%40%42%43%39%41% Table 20: Participation -Safety Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or more than once a month, yes)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Was NOT the victim of a crime97%86%90%88%94%90%91%85%92%91%89%91% Did NOT report a crime87%79%83%83%83%82%87%85%82%83%83%83% Stocked supplies in preparation for an emergency15%25%23%17%24%19%29%25%20%21%21%21% 7 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 21: Participation -Mobility Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or more than once a month, yes)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Walked or biked instead of driving53%58%43%55%52%51%61%53%53%53%53%53% Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone37%45%29%47%30%38%42%41%38%41%36%39% Used bus or other public transportation instead of driving17%14%10%17%12%11%26%27%11%11%19%14% Table 22: Participation -Natural Environment Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or more than once a month, yes)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Recycle at home90%99%95%94%96%98%85%81%99%98%90%95% Made efforts to make your home more energy efficient75%84%70%76%80%78%79%72%80%80%75%78% Made efforts to conserve water81%83%74%78%83%79%87%79%81%81%80%80% Table 23: Participation -Built Environment Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or more than once a month, yes)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall NOT under housing cost stress70%73%61%67%71%74%53%50%74%71%66%69% Did NOT observe a code violation80%57%58%66%64%67%61%71%64%62%71%65% Table 24: Participation -Economy Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or more than once a month, yes)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Purchase goods or services from abusiness located in Shakopee94%94%97%95%94%96%87%91%95%96%92%94% Economy will have positive impact on income32%28%29%25%34%32%20%21%32%35%22%30% Work in Shakopee39%47%23%41%38%35%58%47%38%40%39%40% 8 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 25: Participation -Recreation and Wellness Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or more than once a month, yes)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Used Shakopee recreation centers or their services46%63%39%55%49%53%47%38%56%59%42%52% Visited a neighborhood park or City park89%94%67%85%88%87%88%79%89%91%81%87% Eat at least 5 portions of fruits and vegetables a day84%86%73%84%81%83%83%72%86%86%78%83% Participate in moderate or vigorous physical activity73%89%76%82%79%82%75%75%82%82%78%80% Reported being in "very good" or "excellent"health82%75%49%68%76%75%64%55%77%78%63%72% Table 26: Participation -Education and Enrichment Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or more than once a month, yes)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Used Shakopee public libraries or their services55%66%54%64%56%59%60%67%58%58%63%59% Participated in religious or spiritual activities in Shakopee27%47%49%37%42%41%35%33%42%48%29%40% Attended a City-sponsored event37%51%28%41%42%42%42%27%45%49%30%41% Table 27: Participation -Community Engagement Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, more 18-35-White alone, not Hispanic and/or than once a month, yes)345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Campaigned or advocated for an issue, cause or candidate11%22%29%19%19%21%15%13%21%23%14%19% Contacted Shakopee elected officials (in-person, phone, email or web) to express your opinion3%16%23%11%15%12%14%5%15%15%10%13% Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Shakopee16%42%32%32%30%33%22%9%36%38%20%31% Participated in a club10%25%23%22%16%18%25%11%21%24%13%19% Talked to or visited with your immediate neighbors88%92%94%89%93%96%75%79%94%96%84%91% Done a favor for a neighbor64%81%86%75%76%79%63%67%78%80%70%76% Attended a local public meeting 6%22%19%15%17%16%13%9%18%17%14%16% Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting10%26%28%24%18%19%28%24%20%22%19%21% Read or watch local news (via television, paper, computer, etc.)82%86%91%89%82%88%80%90%85%86%86%86% Vote in local elections74%91%95%90%83%89%74%83%87%90%80%86% 9 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 28: Community Focus Areas Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type 18-35-White alone, Hispanic and/or Percent rating positively (e.g., essential/very important)345455+FemaleMalenot Hispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee91%94%97%98%89%93%97%100%92%93%95%94% Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit69%79%81%79%73%75%79%86%73%71%82%76% Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee80%79%74%76%81%75%91%79%78%77%81%78% Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including overall design, buildings, parks and transportation systems)80%79%74%79%79%77%84%85%76%75%83%78% Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee73%75%81%76%75%73%86%74%76%73%79%75% Overall opportunities for education and enrichment77%80%76%80%76%77%85%82%77%76%81%78% Overall economic health of Shakopee87%93%88%87%93%91%87%78%93%93%86%90% Sense of community85%84%75%83%80%79%96%88%81%82%83%82% Table 29: Question 8 Additional Line Item -Visited Downtown Shakopee AgeSexRace/ethnicityHousing tenureHousing unit type 18-3435-5455+FemaleMaleWhite alone, not HispanicHispanic and/or other raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Visited downtown Shakopee95%93%93%93%93%94%92%95%93%94%93%93% Table 30: City Residential Property Code Enforcement Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Hispanic 18-35-White alone, and/or other 345455+FemaleMalenot HispanicraceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall To what degree would you support or oppose a more active/strong approach by the City in enforcement of residential property codes?85%84%93%95%79%86%89%95%84%85%88%86% 10 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 31: Sources of Information Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Please indicate how much of a source, if at all, you consider each of the following to be for obtaining information about the City White Hispanic government and its activities, events and services:(Percent rating as 18-35-alone, not and/or "Major" or "Minor source").345455+FemaleMaleHispanicother raceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall City website (www.ShakopeeMN.gov)85%92%80%87%88%89%84%72%92%92%81%88% Shakopee Valley News81%90%85%86%85%84%90%84%86%87%83%86% Star Tribune50%48%52%52%48%46%64%63%46%45%56%49% Local government cable channel (Comcast 16/CenturyLink 240)29%41%49%36%40%35%53%56%33%35%44%39% City Newsletter (Hometown Messenger/Parks and Recreation Activity Brochure)81%84%83%82%83%83%81%88%81%82%85%83% Talking with City officials37%53%59%46%50%48%51%31%53%56%37%48% City communications via social media71%71%57%72%63%67%74%73%67%70%66%68% Word-of-mouth79%79%73%78%77%79%75%80%77%79%76%78% Email (E-News, eNotifications)65%65%60%67%62%65%62%59%66%67%59%64% Table 32: Importance of Addressing City Projects Housing AgeSexRace/ethnicitytenureHousing unit type Please indicate how important, if at all, each of the following Hispanic projects and issues will be for the City to address over the next 18-35-White alone, and/or other five years? (Percent rating as "Essential" or "Very important").345455+FemaleMalenot HispanicraceRentOwnDetachedAttachedOverall Redeveloping downtown69%65%61%68%64%63%80%88%60%63%71%65% Improving the riverfront at Huber Park46%40%30%38%43%36%58%48%38%39%42%40% Enhancement and preservation of natural resources and open space within the City59%60%54%55%62%55%73%56%59%60%56%58% Improving access to public transportation49%44%59%58%40%42%74%84%39%38%65%48% Construction of a third Fire Station to improve fire and emergency response times 45%43%46%53%36%43%51%56%41%42%48%44% 11 Shakopee,MN Comparisons by GeographicSubgroups 2016 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301Washington, DC 20002 n-r-c.com • 303-444-7863icma.org • 800-745-8780 Summary The National Citizen Survey™ (The NCS™) is a collaborative effort between National Research Center, Inc. (NRC) and the International City/County Management Association (ICMA). The survey and its administration are standardized to assure high quality researchmethods and directly comparable results across The NCS communities. This report discussesdifferences in opinion of survey respondents by subarea. Responses in the following tables show only the proportion of respondents giving a certain answer; for example, the percent of respondents who rated the quality of life as “excellent” or “good,” or the percent of respondents who attended a public meeting more than once a month.ANOVA and chi-square tests of significance were applied to these comparisons of survey questions. A “p-value” of 0.05 orless indicates that there is less than a 5% probability that differences observed between subareaare due to chance; or in other words, a greater than 95% probability that the differences observed are “real.” Where differences were statistically significant, they have been shaded grey. The margin of error for this report is generally no greater than plus or minus fivepercentage points around any given percent reported for the entire sample (410completed surveys). For each subarea(subarea1,subarea2, subarea 3and subarea4), the margin of error rises to approximately plus or minus 13percentage points since sample sizes were approximately 102 for subarea1, 156 for subarea2, 96 for subarea3 and 56 for subarea4. Notable differences between subareasincluded the following: Residents living in subarea1 tended to rate Shakopee as a place to live lower than those living in other subareas, while residents of subareas 1 and 2 tended to give lower ratingsto Shakopee as a place to raise children than residents elsewhere. Where differences were significant, residentsliving in subarea4 tended to rate aspects of Built Environment higher than their counterparts. A vast majority of subarea4 residents favorably rated the availability of affordable quality health care in Shakopee. In Governance, subarea4 residents were more likely to positively rate the services provided by the City of Shakopee and the job Shakopee government does at welcoming citizen involvement than their peers. Additionally, where significance was noted, subarea4 residents tended to rate aspects of Mobility higher than those living in the other subareas.Roughly half of subarea1 residents rated the economic development in Shakopee favorably which was lower than ratings given in other subareas. Within the pillar of Participation, subarea1 residents reported being less likely to recommend living in Shakopee to someone who askedthat residents living in the other four subareas. Respondents residing in subarea4 were significantly more likelyto reportthat they had carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving aloneand to report being in “very good” or “excellent” health compared to their counterparts. When asked about their support or opposition to the City implementing a stronger approach to code enforcement, subarea1 and 2 residents were more likely to be in favor compared to the other three subareas. Sources of information were utilized differently by different subareas; subarea1 residents used the City website less frequently as a source of information compared to their peers, while subarea2 residents utilized the Star Tribune as more of source than those in the other subareas. Also, subarea 3reported the local government cable channel was less of a source of information for them compared to residents living elsewhere in the City. Differences were also seen among residents when asked about the importance of addressing certain projects and issues over the next five years. Subareas2 and 4 residents tended to be more in favor of the City improving the riverfront at Huber Park compared to their counterparts and subareas1and 2 residents were more likely to report that improving access to public transportation was very important or essential compared to residents in other subareas. 1 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 1: Community Characteristics -General Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good)Subarea1Subarea2Subarea3Subarea4Overall The overall quality of life in Shakopee76%82%81%86%81% Overall image or reputation of Shakopee51%55%53%72%56% Shakopee as a place to live71%89%88%89%85% Your neighborhood as a place to live71%78%82%87%79% Shakopee as a place to raise children68%72%87%87%77% Shakopee as a place to retire55%51%46%56%52% Overall appearance of Shakopee61%71%65%70%68% Table 2: Community Characteristics -Safety Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, very/somewhat SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea safe)1234Overall Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee75%80%79%81%79% In your neighborhood during the day91%91%97%90%92% In Shakopee's downtown/commercial areas during the day88%88%87%95%89% Table 3: Community Characteristics -Mobility Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, very/somewhat SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea safe)1234Overall Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit75%85%75%77%80% Traffic flow on major streets75%73%72%67%73% Ease of public parking59%74%82%76%73% Ease of travel by car in Shakopee79%78%92%87%83% Ease of travel by public transportation in Shakopee36%32%46%48%38% Ease of travel by bicycle in Shakopee65%57%56%64%59% Ease of walking in Shakopee61%69%60%73%65% Availability ofpaths and walking trails70%71%66%67%69% Table 4: Community Characteristics -Natural Environment Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, very/somewhat SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea safe)1234Overall Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee68%81%73%76%76% Air quality74%80%77%83%78% Cleanliness of Shakopee84%71%82%81%78% Table 5: Community Characteristics -Built Environment Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, very/somewhat SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea safe)1234Overall Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including overall design, buildings, parks and transportation systems)46%66%58%74%61% Public places where people want to spend time64%64%60%58%62% Variety of housing options43%69%63%81%63% Availability of affordable quality housing38%57%59%72%55% Overall quality of new development in Shakopee57%65%60%73%63% 2 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 6: Community Characteristics -Economy Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, very/somewhat SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea safe)1234Overall Overall economic health of Shakopee64%65%68%72%66% Shakopee as a place to work77%58%52%69%61% Shakopee as a place to visit70%71%63%71%69% Employment opportunities60%67%54%72%63% Shopping opportunities42%51%39%42%45% Cost of living in Shakopee45%50%53%66%51% Overall quality of business and service establishments in Shakopee59%60%50%57%57% Vibrant downtown/commercial areas41%33%22%37%32% Table 7: Community Characteristics -Recreation and Wellness Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, very/somewhat SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea safe)1234Overall Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee72%71%76%76%73% Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.)66%65%51%65%62% Recreational opportunities73%68%66%64%68% Availability of affordable quality food57%57%61%65%59% Availability of affordable quality health care67%74%75%94%75% Availability of preventive health services73%73%77%93%76% Availability ofaffordable quality mental health care51%60%52%66%57% Table 8: Community Characteristics -Education and Enrichment Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, very/somewhat SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea safe)1234Overall Overall opportunities for education and enrichment66%64%66%69%66% Availability of affordable quality child care/preschool56%49%59%71%55% K-12 education70%67%71%76%70% Adult educational opportunities53%54%43%51%51% Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities37%48%34%43%41% Opportunities to participate in religious or spiritual events and activities71%67%68%73%69% Table 9: Community Characteristics -Community Engagement Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, very/somewhat SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea safe)1234Overall Opportunities to participate in social events and activities47%46%47%48%47% Opportunities to volunteer57%51%70%63%59% Opportunities to participate in community matters41%46%59%67%51% Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds51%54%71%63%58% Neighborliness of residents in Shakopee48%51%65%55%54% 3 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 10: Governance -General Subarea SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good)1234Overall The City of Shakopee65%74%63%84%71% The value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee55%50%35%47%47% The overall direction that Shakopee is taking57%62%57%73%61% The job Shakopee government does at welcoming citizen involvement37%57%37%63%48% Overall confidence in Shakopee government54%56%42%63%53% Generally acting in the best interest of the community54%60%45%59%55% Being honest46%59%51%65%55% Treating all residents fairly52%60%54%68%58% Overall customer service by Shakopee employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.)67%74%69%88%73% The Federal Government48%51%43%53%49% Scott County Government68%71%61%73%68% Table 11: Governance -Safety Subarea SubareaSubareaSubarea Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good)1234Overall Policeservices84%85%83%93%85% Fire services82%94%93%94%91% Crime prevention69%74%75%85%75% Fire prevention and education89%81%78%83%82% Animal control60%66%77%81%69% Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations)49%63%56%66%58% Table 12: Governance -Mobility Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good)Subarea1Subarea2Subarea3Subarea4Overall Traffic enforcement76%76%67%73%74% Street repair48%56%50%78%56% Street cleaning70%76%67%83%74% Street lighting57%55%54%79%58% Snow removal71%72%74%82%73% Sidewalk maintenance61%67%69%83%68% Traffic signal timing68%52%57%74%59% Table 13: Governance -Natural Environment Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good)Subarea1Subarea2Subarea3Subarea4Overall Garbage collection75%86%82%94%84% Recycling91%82%78%94%84% Shakopee open space59%58%58%69%59% 4 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 14: Governance -Built Environment Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good)Subarea1Subarea2Subarea3Subarea4Overall Storm drainage80%84%80%93%83% Sewer services75%81%87%90%82% Land use, planning and zoning47%52%43%56%49% Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.)48%54%45%65%52% Cable television49%45%42%50%46% Table 15: Governance -Economy Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good)Subarea1Subarea2Subarea3Subarea4Overall Economic development54%67%67%79%66% Table 16: Governance -Recreation and Wellness Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good)Subarea1Subarea2Subarea3Subarea4Overall City parks77%83%80%87%82% Recreation programs or classes66%75%58%75%69% Recreation centers or facilities64%70%58%69%66% Table 17: Governance -Educationand Enrichment Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good)Subarea1Subarea2Subarea3Subarea4Overall City-sponsored special events54%57%56%64%57% Table 18: Governance -Community Engagement Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good)Subarea1Subarea2Subarea3Subarea4Overall Public information services51%61%66%73%61% Table 19: Participation General Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, more than SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea once a month, yes)1234Overall Sense of community47%54%52%62%53% Recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks74%86%89%88%84% Remain in Shakopee for the next five years77%81%87%91%83% Contacted the City of Shakopee (in-person, phone, email or web) for help or information45%40%38%44%41% Table 20: Participation -Safety Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, more than SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea once a month, yes)1234Overall Was NOT the victim of a crime90%87%97%91%91% Did NOT report a crime85%83%81%82%83% Stocked supplies in preparation for an emergency15%23%23%24%21% 5 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 21: Participation -Mobility Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, more than SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea once a month, yes)1234Overall Walked or biked instead of driving64%51%52%44%53% Carpooledwith other adults or children instead of driving alone30%34%45%58%39% Used bus or other public transportation instead of driving14%14%13%16%14% Table 22: Participation -Natural Environment Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, more than SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea once a month, yes)1234Overall Recycle at home86%97%98%97%95% Made efforts to make your home more energy efficient68%82%73%92%78% Made efforts to conserve water71%82%85%82%80% Table 23: Participation -Built Environment Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, more than SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea once a month, yes)1234Overall NOT under housing cost stress60%72%72%69%69% Did NOT observe a code violation66%66%56%77%65% Table 24: Participation -Economy Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, more than SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea once a month, yes)1234Overall Purchase goods or services from a business located in Shakopee99%92%95%90%94% Economy will have positive impact on income28%25%33%43%30% Work in Shakopee41%44%32%36%40% Table 25: Participation -Recreation and Wellness Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, more than SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea once a month, yes)1234Overall Used Shakopee recreation centers or their services45%49%56%66%52% Visited a neighborhood park or City park76%88%92%93%87% Eat at least 5 portions of fruits and vegetables a day75%82%87%91%83% Participate in moderate or vigorous physical activity74%79%83%93%80% Reported being in "very good" or "excellent" health62%71%74%91%72% Table 26: Participation -Education and Enrichment Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, more than SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea once a month, yes)1234Overall Used Shakopee public libraries or their services59%58%67%48%59% Participated in religious or spiritual activities in Shakopee39%36%44%51%40% Attended a City-sponsored event38%37%49%47%41% 6 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 27: Participation-Community Engagement Subarea Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, more than SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea once a month, yes)1234Overall Campaigned or advocated for an issue, cause or candidate22%15%20%30%19% Contacted Shakopee elected officials (in-person, phone, email or web) to express your opinion20%10%11%14%13% Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Shakopee33%24%36%42%31% Participated in a club18%17%20%30%19% Talked to or visited with your immediate neighbors83%93%95%93%91% Done a favor for a neighbor74%75%75%82%76% Attended a local public meeting 13%11%24%24%16% Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting18%22%18%24%21% Read or watch local news (viatelevision, paper, computer, etc.)91%85%85%82%86% Vote in local elections89%84%84%93%86% Table 28: Community Focus Areas Subarea SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea Percent rating positively (e.g., essential/very important)1234Overall Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee96%93%96%86%94% Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit74%78%77%68%76% Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee78%80%79%71%78% Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including overall design, buildings, parks and transportation systems)76%77%84%75%78% Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee80%78%69%71%75% Overall opportunities for education and enrichment85%76%75%80%78% Overall economic health of Shakopee84%89%94%96%90% Sense of community80%83%87%77%82% Table 29: Question 8 Additional Line Item -Visited Downtown Shakopee Subarea Subarea1Subarea2Subarea3Subarea4Overall Visited downtown Shakopee98%94%92%87%93% Table 30: City Residential Property Code Enforcement Subarea SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea 1234Overall To what degree would you support or oppose a more active/strong approach by the City in enforcement of residential property codes?92%90%80%77%86% Table 31: Sources of Information Please indicate how much of a source, if at all, you consider each of Subarea the following to be for obtaining information about the City government and its activities, events and services:(Percent rating SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea as "Major" or "Minor source").1234Overall City website (www.ShakopeeMN.gov)73%91%89%99%88% Shakopee Valley News82%86%88%88%86% Star Tribune47%58%40%43%49% Local government cable channel (Comcast 16/CenturyLink 240)37%47%25%38%39% 7 The National Citizen Survey™ Please indicate how much of a source, if at all, you consider each of Subarea the following to be for obtaining information about the City government and its activities, events and services:(Percent rating SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea as "Major" or "Minor source").1234Overall City Newsletter (Hometown Messenger/Parks and Recreation Activity Brochure)81%83%81%88%83% Talking with City officials46%48%47%57%48% City communications via social media66%68%68%74%68% Word-of-mouth86%75%76%76%78% Email (E-News, eNotifications)58%64%68%73%64% Table 32: Importance of Addressing City Projects Subarea Pleaseindicate how important, if at all, each of the following projects and issues will be for the City to address over the next SubareaSubareaSubareaSubarea five years? (Percent rating as "Essential" or "Very important").1234Overall Redeveloping downtown70%71%56%59%65% Improving the riverfront at Huber Park29%49%32%41%40% Enhancement and preservation of natural resources and open space within the City52%65%53%53%58% Improving access to public transportation62%53%33%37%48% Construction of a third Fire Station to improve fire and emergency response times 53%42%36%50%44% 8 Shakopee,MN Technical Appendices 2016 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301Washington, DC 20002 n-r-c.com • 303-444-7863icma.org • 800-745-8780 The National Citizen Survey™ Contents Appendix A: Complete Survey Responses..........................................1 Appendix B: Benchmark Comparisons.............................................19 Appendix C: Detailed Survey Methods.............................................32 Appendix D: Survey Materials.........................................................37 The National Citizen Survey™ © 2001-2017 National Research Center, Inc. The NCS™ is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA. NRC is a charter member of the AAPOR Transparency Initiative, providing clear disclosure of our sound and ethical survey research practices. The National Citizen Survey™ Appendix A: Complete Survey Responses Responses excluding “don’t know” The following pages contain a complete setof responses to each question on the survey, excluding the “don’t know” responses. The percent of respondents giving a particular response is shown followed by the number of respondents (denoted with “N=”). Table 1: Question 1 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee:ExcellentGoodFairPoorTotal Shakopee as a place to live24%N=9861%N=24910%N=425%N=19100%N=408 Your neighborhood as a place to live30%N=12349%N=19915%N=636%N=24100%N=409 Shakopee as a place to raise children25%N=9152%N=18718%N=675%N=18100%N=362 Shakopee as a place to work23%N=6938%N=11531%N=947%N=22100%N=300 Shakopee as a place to visit24%N=9644%N=17526%N=1035%N=20100%N=394 Shakopee as a place to retire15%N=4437%N=11031%N=9417%N=50100%N=299 The overall quality of life in Shakopee14%N=5667%N=26516%N=623%N=13100%N=396 Table 2: Question 2 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole:ExcellentGoodFairPoorTotal Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee20%N=8458%N=24019%N=763%N=11100%N=410 Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit25%N=10454%N=22115%N=615%N=22100%N=408 Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee17%N=6859%N=24122%N=882%N=9100%N=406 Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including overall design, buildings, parks and transportation systems)11%N=4450%N=19934%N=1355%N=22100%N=400 Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee17%N=6756%N=21523%N=894%N=16100%N=387 Overall opportunities for education and enrichment18%N=6647%N=17029%N=1046%N=21100%N=360 Overall economic health ofShakopee15%N=5352%N=18630%N=1074%N=14100%N=360 Sense of community8%N=3345%N=17536%N=14211%N=43100%N=392 Overall image or reputation of Shakopee9%N=3547%N=18735%N=13810%N=38100%N=398 Table 3: Question 3 Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following:Very likelySomewhat likelySomewhat unlikelyVery unlikelyTotal Recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks31%N=12753%N=2169%N=377%N=27100%N=407 Remain in Shakopee for the next five years51%N=20331%N=1248%N=3010%N=38100%N=394 Table 4: Question 4 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel:Very safeSomewhat safeNeither safe nor unsafeSomewhat unsafeVery unsafeTotal In your neighborhood during the day73%N=29519%N=785%N=202%N=81%N=5100%N=405 In Shakopee's downtown/commercial areas during the day56%N=21732%N=1257%N=264%N=170%N=2100%N=386 1 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 5: Question 5 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole:ExcellentGoodFairPoorTotal Traffic flow on major streets12%N=5060%N=24723%N=934%N=18100%N=408 Ease of public parking18%N=7155%N=21721%N=856%N=24100%N=397 Ease of travel by car in Shakopee25%N=10158%N=23614%N=573%N=14100%N=408 Ease of travel by public transportation in Shakopee6%N=1232%N=5840%N=7222%N=41100%N=183 Ease of travel by bicycle in Shakopee12%N=3647%N=13932%N=959%N=27100%N=297 Ease of walking in Shakopee18%N=7048%N=18527%N=1077%N=28100%N=389 Availability of paths and walking trails25%N=9844%N=17524%N=967%N=28100%N=396 Air quality23%N=8955%N=21617%N=684%N=17100%N=390 Cleanliness of Shakopee17%N=6961%N=24718%N=754%N=17100%N=408 Overall appearance of Shakopee14%N=5853%N=21627%N=1105%N=22100%N=405 Public places where people want to spend time11%N=4252%N=20428%N=1119%N=36100%N=393 Variety of housing options14%N=5449%N=18326%N=9711%N=40100%N=374 Availability of affordable quality housing14%N=4641%N=14131%N=10614%N=48100%N=342 Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.)14%N=5648%N=18530%N=1168%N=30100%N=388 Recreational opportunities14%N=5554%N=20326%N=976%N=24100%N=378 Availability of affordable quality food14%N=5545%N=18325%N=10016%N=66100%N=404 Availability of affordable quality health care22%N=8453%N=20320%N=775%N=20100%N=384 Availability of preventive health services23%N=8453%N=19220%N=714%N=15100%N=363 Availability of affordable quality mental health care11%N=2445%N=9730%N=6513%N=27100%N=213 Table 6: Question 6 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole:ExcellentGoodFairPoorTotal Availability of affordable quality child care/preschool14%N=2842%N=8831%N=6513%N=28100%N=210 K-12 education17%N=4753%N=14521%N=599%N=24100%N=275 Adult educational opportunities8%N=2343%N=11636%N=9913%N=34100%N=273 Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities7%N=2235%N=11440%N=13219%N=61100%N=329 Opportunities to participate in religious or spiritual events and activities20%N=6249%N=15527%N=854%N=12100%N=314 Employment opportunities16%N=5048%N=15428%N=919%N=28100%N=324 Shopping opportunities11%N=4534%N=13736%N=14419%N=77100%N=403 Cost of living in Shakopee5%N=2146%N=18337%N=14612%N=47100%N=397 Overall quality of business and service establishments in Shakopee9%N=3349%N=18634%N=1309%N=33100%N=383 Vibrant downtown/commercial areas4%N=1429%N=10844%N=16624%N=91100%N=380 Overall quality of new development in Shakopee13%N=5050%N=19030%N=1156%N=24100%N=379 Opportunities to participate in social events and activities9%N=3238%N=13541%N=14712%N=45100%N=359 Opportunities to volunteer10%N=2849%N=13931%N=8711%N=31100%N=285 Opportunities to participate in community matters10%N=2841%N=11738%N=10811%N=32100%N=285 Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds15%N=5044%N=15231%N=10611%N=38100%N=346 Neighborliness of residents in Shakopee13%N=5041%N=15435%N=13211%N=41100%N=378 2 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 7: Question 7 Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months.NoYesTotal Made efforts to conserve water20%N=8080%N=327100%N=407 Made efforts to make your home more energy efficient22%N=8978%N=316100%N=405 Observed a code violation or other hazard in Shakopee (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.)65%N=26035%N=139100%N=399 Household member was a victim of a crime in Shakopee91%N=3689%N=38100%N=406 Reported a crime to the police in Shakopee83%N=33617%N=69100%N=406 Stocked supplies in preparation for an emergency79%N=31921%N=85100%N=404 Campaigned or advocated for an issue, cause or candidate81%N=32719%N=78100%N=404 Contacted the City of Shakopee (in-person, phone, email or web) for help or information59%N=23841%N=166100%N=404 Contacted Shakopee elected officials (in-person,phone, email or web) to express your opinion87%N=35313%N=52100%N=405 Table 8: Question 8 In the last 12 months, about how many times, if at all, have you or other household 2times a week or 2-4 times a Once a month or members done each of the following in Shakopee?moremonthlessNot at allTotal Used Shakopee recreation centers or their services7%N=3013%N=5232%N=13048%N=196100%N=408 Visited a neighborhood park or City park14%N=5533%N=13440%N=16413%N=54100%N=406 Used Shakopee public libraries or their services4%N=1516%N=6539%N=15941%N=164100%N=404 Participated in religious or spiritual activities in Shakopee9%N=3816%N=6515%N=6160%N=242100%N=406 Attended a City-sponsored event1%N=44%N=1537%N=14959%N=239100%N=407 Used bus or other public transportation instead of driving3%N=122%N=109%N=3686%N=349100%N=406 Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone13%N=5413%N=5213%N=5161%N=250100%N=406 Walked or biked instead of driving8%N=3416%N=6628%N=11547%N=191100%N=406 Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Shakopee4%N=177%N=2920%N=8069%N=282100%N=408 Participated in a club3%N=115%N=2111%N=4681%N=327100%N=406 Talked to or visited with your immediate neighbors31%N=12735%N=14025%N=1039%N=35100%N=405 Done a favor for a neighbor16%N=6416%N=6444%N=18124%N=99100%N=409 Visited downtown Shakopee13%N=5233%N=13448%N=1967%N=27100%N=408 Table 9: Question 9 Thinking about local public meetings (of local elected officials like City Council or County Commissioners, advisory boards, town halls, HOA, neighborhood watch, etc.), in the last 12 months, about how many times, if at all, have you or other household members attended or watched a local 2 times a 2-4 times a Once a month public meeting?week or moremonthor lessNot at allTotal Attended a local public meeting 0%N=21%N=315%N=5984%N=341100%N=405 Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting1%N=25%N=1816%N=6379%N=322100%N=405 3 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 10: Question 10 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee:ExcellentGoodFairPoorTotal Police services32%N=11553%N=19211%N=413%N=12100%N=359 Fire services35%N=11056%N=1779%N=290%N=0100%N=316 Crime prevention18%N=5757%N=18120%N=645%N=17100%N=319 Fire prevention and education22%N=6360%N=16717%N=471%N=2100%N=279 Traffic enforcement16%N=5358%N=19221%N=706%N=18100%N=334 Street repair8%N=2948%N=18135%N=1339%N=35100%N=377 Street cleaning14%N=5659%N=23222%N=884%N=16100%N=391 Street lighting11%N=4447%N=18132%N=12210%N=38100%N=385 Snow removal25%N=9748%N=19020%N=797%N=26100%N=392 Sidewalk maintenance16%N=5652%N=18624%N=867%N=26100%N=354 Traffic signal timing14%N=5745%N=18126%N=10614%N=57100%N=402 Garbage collection22%N=8762%N=24312%N=474%N=17100%N=395 Recycling23%N=9161%N=23512%N=454%N=16100%N=388 Storm drainage20%N=6963%N=21614%N=483%N=9100%N=342 Sewer services20%N=6862%N=20815%N=503%N=9100%N=335 City parks25%N=9457%N=21114%N=524%N=17100%N=374 Recreation programs or classes15%N=4354%N=15021%N=5910%N=28100%N=280 Recreation centers or facilities14%N=4252%N=15327%N=807%N=22100%N=296 Land use, planning and zoning7%N=1942%N=11934%N=9517%N=47100%N=280 Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.)8%N=2244%N=12127%N=7521%N=57100%N=275 Animal control15%N=3954%N=13619%N=4912%N=30100%N=254 Economic development11%N=3755%N=18425%N=8210%N=32100%N=335 Public information services11%N=3151%N=15029%N=8610%N=28100%N=295 Cable television9%N=2537%N=10930%N=8725%N=72100%N=294 Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations)11%N=2647%N=11331%N=7311%N=28100%N=241 Shakopee open space9%N=3150%N=16629%N=9711%N=37100%N=331 City-sponsored special events10%N=2847%N=12928%N=7815%N=42100%N=278 Overall customer service by Shakopee employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.)20%N=6853%N=18519%N=668%N=27100%N=346 Table 11: Question 11 Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following?ExcellentGoodFairPoorTotal The City of Shakopee17%N=6553%N=19925%N=925%N=17100%N=372 The Federal Government7%N=2342%N=14533%N=11319%N=66100%N=347 Scott County Government18%N=6650%N=18324%N=888%N=28100%N=364 4 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 12: Question 12 Please rate the following categories of Shakopee government performance:ExcellentGoodFairPoorTotal The value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee7%N=2739%N=14537%N=13516%N=60100%N=367 The overall direction that Shakopee is taking12%N=4749%N=18327%N=10112%N=46100%N=377 The job Shakopee government does at welcoming citizen involvement9%N=2739%N=12133%N=10318%N=56100%N=307 Overall confidence in Shakopee government6%N=2447%N=17133%N=12114%N=50100%N=366 Generally acting in the best interest of the community9%N=3246%N=16230%N=10714%N=50100%N=350 Being honest9%N=2846%N=14427%N=8318%N=57100%N=312 Treating all residents fairly13%N=4045%N=14130%N=9312%N=37100%N=312 Table 13: Question 13 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Shakopee community to focus on Very Somewhat Not at all each of the following in the coming two years:EssentialimportantimportantimportantTotal Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee52%N=21341%N=1696%N=260%N=0100%N=408 Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit26%N=10350%N=20222%N=873%N=11100%N=403 Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee27%N=11151%N=20720%N=822%N=7100%N=407 Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including overall design, buildings, parks and transportation systems)31%N=12547%N=19120%N=832%N=7100%N=406 Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee29%N=11846%N=18822%N=883%N=12100%N=406 Overall opportunities for education and enrichment37%N=14941%N=16819%N=783%N=12100%N=408 Overall economic health of Shakopee45%N=18445%N=1839%N=371%N=4100%N=408 Sense of community33%N=13649%N=20015%N=632%N=9100%N=407 Table 14: Question 14 To what degree would you support or oppose a more active/strong approach by the City in enforcement of residential property codes?PercentNumber Strongly support34%N=121 Somewhat support53%N=192 Somewhat oppose9%N=33 Strongly oppose4%N=16 Total100%N=362 Table 15: Question 15 Which of these items, if any, would attract you to Downtown Shakopee more often?PercentNumber Retail39%N=156 Public amenities6%N=25 Public events14%N=58 Restaurants41%N=164 Total100%N=403 5 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 16: Question 16 Please indicate how much of a source, if at all, you consider each of the following to be for obtaining information about the City government and its activities, events and services:Major sourceMinor sourceNot a sourceTotal City website (www.ShakopeeMN.gov)57%N=23030%N=12312%N=50100%N=403 Shakopee Valley News49%N=19837%N=15014%N=58100%N=406 Star Tribune17%N=6733%N=13251%N=203100%N=403 Local government cable channel (Comcast 16/CenturyLink 240)9%N=3530%N=12061%N=246100%N=401 City Newsletter (Hometown Messenger/Parks and Recreation Activity Brochure)35%N=14148%N=19117%N=69100%N=400 Talking with City officials14%N=5734%N=13652%N=206100%N=399 City communications via social media23%N=9145%N=18232%N=128100%N=402 Word-of-mouth27%N=11050%N=20222%N=91100%N=403 Email (E-News, eNotifications)23%N=9341%N=16636%N=143100%N=401 Table 17: Question 17 Please indicate how important, if at all, each of the following projects and issues will be for the Very Somewhat Not at all City to address over the next five years?EssentialimportantimportantimportantTotal Redeveloping downtown33%N=12733%N=12629%N=1135%N=21100%N=388 Improving the riverfront at Huber Park16%N=6224%N=9143%N=16717%N=65100%N=386 Enhancement and preservation of natural resourcesand open space within the City19%N=7439%N=14936%N=1386%N=23100%N=383 Improving access to public transportation21%N=7627%N=10134%N=12618%N=64100%N=367 Construction of a third Fire Station to improve fire and emergency response times 14%N=5030%N=10444%N=15412%N=41100%N=349 Table 18: Question D1 How often, if at all, do you do each of the following, considering all of the times you could?NeverRarelySometimesUsuallyAlwaysTotal Recycle at home4%N=171%N=21%N=420%N=8274%N=299100%N=404 Purchase goods or services from a business located in Shakopee1%N=25%N=2131%N=12342%N=16822%N=89100%N=404 Eat at least 5 portions of fruits and vegetables a day3%N=1314%N=5542%N=16627%N=10813%N=51100%N=393 Participate in moderate or vigorous physical activity1%N=618%N=7338%N=15426%N=10316%N=65100%N=401 Read or watch local news (via television, paper, computer, etc.)1%N=613%N=5121%N=8334%N=13731%N=127100%N=404 Vote in local elections7%N=277%N=306%N=2524%N=9556%N=227100%N=404 Table 19: Question D2 Would you say that in general your health is:PercentNumber Excellent22%N=90 Very good50%N=203 Good22%N=89 Fair4%N=18 Poor1%N=6 Total100%N=407 6 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 20: Question D3 What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be:PercentNumber Very positive5%N=19 Somewhat positive25%N=100 Neutral53%N=216 Somewhat negative13%N=53 Very negative4%N=17 Total100%N=405 Table 21: Question D4 What is your employment status?PercentNumber Working full time for pay75%N=306 Working part time for pay8%N=32 Unemployed, looking for paid work3%N=12 Unemployed, not looking for paid work2%N=9 Fully retired12%N=47 Total100%N=406 Table 22: Question D5 Do you work inside the boundaries of Shakopee?PercentNumber Yes, outside the home34%N=137 Yes, from home5%N=21 No60%N=241 Total100%N=399 Table 23: Question D6 How many years have you lived in Shakopee?PercentNumber Less than 2 years17%N=70 2 to 5 years20%N=80 6 to 10 years17%N=70 11 to 20 years27%N=112 More than 20 years19%N=75 Total100%N=407 Table 24: Question D7 Which best describes the building you live in?PercentNumber One family house detached from any other houses60%N=244 Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, apartment or condominium)38%N=156 Mobile home0%N=0 Other2%N=8 Total100%N=408 7 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 25: Question D8 Is this house, apartment or mobile home...PercentNumber Rented21%N=86 Owned79%N=320 Total100%N=406 Table 26: Question D9 About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)?PercentNumber Less than $300 per month2%N=8 $300 to $599 per month8%N=31 $600 to $999 per month12%N=47 $1,000 to $1,499 per month37%N=147 $1,500 to $2,499 per month34%N=135 $2,500 or more per month8%N=34 Total100%N=402 Table 27: Question D10 Do any children 17 or under live in your household?PercentNumber No50%N=204 Yes50%N=202 Total100%N=406 Table 28: Question D11 Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older?PercentNumber No83%N=338 Yes17%N=71 Total100%N=408 Table 29: Question D12 How much do you anticipate your household's total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.)PercentNumber Less than $25,0007%N=29 $25,000 to $49,99918%N=70 $50,000 to $99,99934%N=134 $100,000 to $149,99926%N=105 $150,000 or more15%N=61 Total100%N=398 Table 30: Question D13 Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino?PercentNumber No, not Spanish, Hispanic or Latino96%N=389 Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic or Latino4%N=18 Total100%N=407 8 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 31: Question D14 What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race(s) you consider yourself to be.)PercentNumber American Indian or Alaskan Native2%N=10 Asian, Asian Indian or Pacific Islander11%N=45 Black or African American3%N=13 White85%N=346 Other4%N=16 Total may exceed 100% as respondents could select more than one option. Table 32: Question D15 In which category is your age?PercentNumber 18 to 24 years6%N=25 25 to 34 years29%N=117 35 to 44 years21%N=87 45 to 54 years23%N=94 55 to 64 years8%N=34 65 to 74 years8%N=31 75 years or older5%N=19 Total100%N=408 Table 33: Question D16 What isyour sex?PercentNumber Female51%N=202 Male49%N=197 Total100%N=399 Table 34: Question D17 Do you consider a cell phone or landline your primary telephone number?PercentNumber Cell71%N=289 Land line14%N=57 Both15%N=61 Total100%N=407 9 The National Citizen Survey™ Responses including “don’t know” The following pages contain a complete set of responses to each question on the survey, including the “don’t know”responses. The percent of respondents giving a particular response is shown followed by the number of respondents (denoted with “N=”). Table 35: Question 1 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee:ExcellentGoodFairPoorDon't knowTotal Shakopee as a place to live24%N=9861%N=24910%N=425%N=190%N=0100%N=408 Your neighborhood as a place to live30%N=12349%N=19915%N=636%N=240%N=0100%N=409 Shakopee as a place to raise children22%N=9146%N=18716%N=674%N=1811%N=46100%N=408 Shakopee as a place to work17%N=6928%N=11523%N=945%N=2226%N=108100%N=408 Shakopee as a place to visit24%N=9643%N=17525%N=1035%N=204%N=16100%N=410 Shakopee as a place to retire11%N=4427%N=11023%N=9412%N=5026%N=106100%N=404 The overall quality of life in Shakopee14%N=5665%N=26515%N=623%N=133%N=11100%N=407 Table 36: Question 2 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole:ExcellentGoodFairPoorDon't knowTotal Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee20%N=8458%N=24019%N=763%N=110%N=0100%N=410 Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit25%N=10454%N=22115%N=615%N=220%N=2100%N=410 Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee17%N=6859%N=24122%N=882%N=90%N=1100%N=408 Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including overall design, buildings, parks and transportation systems)11%N=4449%N=19933%N=1355%N=222%N=9100%N=409 Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee16%N=6752%N=21522%N=894%N=166%N=23100%N=410 Overall opportunities for education and enrichment16%N=6642%N=17025%N=1045%N=2112%N=49100%N=410 Overall economic health of Shakopee13%N=5345%N=18626%N=1074%N=1412%N=49100%N=409 Sense of community8%N=3343%N=17535%N=14210%N=433%N=14100%N=406 Overall image or reputation of Shakopee9%N=3546%N=18734%N=1389%N=382%N=10100%N=408 Table 37: Question 3 Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following:Very likelySomewhat likelySomewhat unlikelyVery unlikelyDon't knowTotal Recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks31%N=12753%N=2169%N=377%N=270%N=1100%N=409 Remain in Shakopee for the next five years49%N=20330%N=1247%N=309%N=384%N=16100%N=410 Table 38: Question 4 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel:Very safeSomewhat safeNeither safe nor unsafeSomewhat unsafeVery unsafeDon't knowTotal In your neighborhood during the day72%N=29519%N=785%N=202%N=81%N=51%N=3100%N=407 In Shakopee's downtown/commercial areas during the day53%N=21731%N=1256%N=264%N=170%N=25%N=21100%N=407 10 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 39: Question 5 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole:ExcellentGoodFairPoorDon't knowTotal Traffic flow on major streets12%N=5060%N=24723%N=934%N=180%N=1100%N=409 Ease of public parking17%N=7153%N=21721%N=856%N=243%N=11100%N=408 Ease of travel by car in Shakopee25%N=10158%N=23614%N=573%N=140%N=1100%N=410 Ease of travel by public transportation in Shakopee3%N=1214%N=5818%N=7210%N=4155%N=225100%N=408 Ease of travel by bicycle in Shakopee9%N=3634%N=13923%N=957%N=2727%N=107100%N=404 Ease of walking in Shakopee17%N=7046%N=18526%N=1077%N=284%N=16100%N=405 Availability of paths and walking trails24%N=9843%N=17524%N=967%N=283%N=11100%N=407 Air quality22%N=8953%N=21617%N=684%N=174%N=17100%N=408 Cleanliness of Shakopee17%N=6960%N=24718%N=754%N=170%N=1100%N=410 Overall appearance of Shakopee14%N=5853%N=21627%N=1105%N=220%N=2100%N=407 Public places where people want to spend time10%N=4250%N=20427%N=1119%N=364%N=14100%N=407 Variety of housing options13%N=5445%N=18324%N=9710%N=408%N=33100%N=407 Availability of affordable quality housing11%N=4635%N=14126%N=10612%N=4816%N=66100%N=408 Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.)14%N=5645%N=18528%N=1167%N=305%N=22100%N=410 Recreational opportunities13%N=5550%N=20324%N=976%N=247%N=30100%N=409 Availability of affordable quality food13%N=5545%N=18324%N=10016%N=661%N=4100%N=408 Availability of affordable quality health care21%N=8450%N=20319%N=775%N=206%N=24100%N=409 Availability of preventive health services21%N=8447%N=19218%N=714%N=1511%N=43100%N=406 Availability of affordable quality mental health care6%N=2424%N=9716%N=657%N=2748%N=194100%N=408 Table 40: Question 6 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole:ExcellentGoodFairPoorDon't knowTotal Availability of affordable quality child care/preschool7%N=2822%N=8816%N=657%N=2848%N=191100%N=400 K-12 education12%N=4736%N=14515%N=596%N=2432%N=131100%N=406 Adult educational opportunities6%N=2329%N=11625%N=999%N=3432%N=128100%N=401 Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities5%N=2228%N=11432%N=13215%N=6119%N=76100%N=405 Opportunities to participate in religious or spiritual events and activities15%N=6238%N=15521%N=853%N=1222%N=90100%N=404 Employment opportunities12%N=5038%N=15423%N=917%N=2820%N=78100%N=402 Shopping opportunities11%N=4534%N=13736%N=14419%N=770%N=1100%N=405 Cost of living in Shakopee5%N=2145%N=18336%N=14612%N=472%N=8100%N=405 Overall quality of business and service establishments in Shakopee8%N=3346%N=18632%N=1308%N=336%N=23100%N=406 Vibrant downtown/commercial areas3%N=1427%N=10841%N=16622%N=917%N=27100%N=406 Overall quality of new development in Shakopee12%N=5047%N=19028%N=1156%N=246%N=26100%N=405 Opportunities to participate in social events and activities8%N=3233%N=13536%N=14711%N=4511%N=46100%N=405 Opportunities to volunteer7%N=2834%N=13922%N=878%N=3130%N=119100%N=404 Opportunities to participate in community matters7%N=2829%N=11727%N=1088%N=3229%N=118100%N=403 Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds12%N=5038%N=15226%N=1069%N=3815%N=59100%N=405 Neighborliness of residents in Shakopee13%N=5038%N=15433%N=13210%N=416%N=25100%N=403 11 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 41: Question 7 Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months.NoYesTotal Made efforts to conserve water20%N=8080%N=327100%N=407 Made efforts to make your home more energy efficient22%N=8978%N=316100%N=405 Observed a code violation or other hazard in Shakopee (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.)65%N=26035%N=139100%N=399 Household member was a victim of a crime in Shakopee91%N=3689%N=38100%N=406 Reported a crime to the police in Shakopee83%N=33617%N=69100%N=406 Stocked supplies in preparation for an emergency79%N=31921%N=85100%N=404 Campaigned or advocated for an issue, cause or candidate81%N=32719%N=78100%N=404 Contacted the City of Shakopee (in-person, phone, email or web) for help or information59%N=23841%N=166100%N=404 Contacted Shakopee elected officials (in-person, phone, email or web) to express your opinion87%N=35313%N=52100%N=405 Table 42: Question 8 In the last 12 months, about how many times, if at all, have you or other household 2 times a week or 2-4 times a Once a month or members done each of the following in Shakopee?moremonthlessNot at allTotal Used Shakopee recreation centers or their services7%N=3013%N=5232%N=13048%N=196100%N=408 Visited a neighborhood park or City park14%N=5533%N=13440%N=16413%N=54100%N=406 Used Shakopee public libraries or their services4%N=1516%N=6539%N=15941%N=164100%N=404 Participated in religious or spiritual activities in Shakopee9%N=3816%N=6515%N=6160%N=242100%N=406 Attended a City-sponsored event1%N=44%N=1537%N=14959%N=239100%N=407 Used bus or other public transportation instead of driving3%N=122%N=109%N=3686%N=349100%N=406 Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone13%N=5413%N=5213%N=5161%N=250100%N=406 Walked or biked instead of driving8%N=3416%N=6628%N=11547%N=191100%N=406 Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Shakopee4%N=177%N=2920%N=8069%N=282100%N=408 Participated in a club3%N=115%N=2111%N=4681%N=327100%N=406 Talked to or visited with your immediate neighbors31%N=12735%N=14025%N=1039%N=35100%N=405 Done a favor for a neighbor16%N=6416%N=6444%N=18124%N=99100%N=409 Visited downtown Shakopee13%N=5233%N=13448%N=1967%N=27100%N=408 Table 43: Question 9 Thinking about local public meetings (of local elected officials like City Council or County Commissioners, advisory boards, town halls, HOA, neighborhood watch, etc.), in the last 12 months, about how many times, if at all, have you or other household members attended or watched a local 2 times a 2-4times a Once a month public meeting?week or moremonthor lessNot at allTotal Attended a local public meeting 0%N=21%N=315%N=5984%N=341100%N=405 Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting1%N=25%N=1816%N=6379%N=322100%N=405 12 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 44: Question 10 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee:ExcellentGoodFairPoorDon't knowTotal Police services29%N=11548%N=19210%N=413%N=1211%N=43100%N=403 Fire services27%N=11044%N=1777%N=290%N=022%N=88100%N=404 Crime prevention14%N=5745%N=18116%N=644%N=1721%N=86100%N=405 Fire prevention and education15%N=6341%N=16712%N=471%N=231%N=126100%N=405 Traffic enforcement13%N=5348%N=19218%N=705%N=1816%N=64100%N=398 Street repair7%N=2945%N=18133%N=1339%N=356%N=25100%N=401 Street cleaning14%N=5658%N=23222%N=884%N=163%N=11100%N=402 Street lighting11%N=4445%N=18131%N=12210%N=384%N=14100%N=399 Snow removal24%N=9747%N=19020%N=796%N=263%N=11100%N=403 Sidewalk maintenance14%N=5646%N=18621%N=866%N=2612%N=48100%N=402 Traffic signal timing14%N=5745%N=18126%N=10614%N=571%N=4100%N=405 Garbage collection22%N=8760%N=24312%N=474%N=172%N=9100%N=403 Recycling22%N=9158%N=23511%N=454%N=164%N=16100%N=404 Storm drainage17%N=6953%N=21612%N=482%N=915%N=62100%N=404 Sewer services17%N=6852%N=20812%N=502%N=917%N=68100%N=403 City parks23%N=9452%N=21113%N=524%N=178%N=31100%N=405 Recreation programs or classes11%N=4337%N=15015%N=597%N=2831%N=126100%N=405 Recreation centers or facilities10%N=4238%N=15320%N=805%N=2226%N=105100%N=401 Land use, planning and zoning5%N=1930%N=11924%N=9512%N=4730%N=120100%N=400 Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.)5%N=2230%N=12118%N=7514%N=5732%N=130100%N=405 Animal control10%N=3934%N=13612%N=497%N=3037%N=152100%N=405 Economicdevelopment9%N=3745%N=18420%N=828%N=3217%N=70100%N=405 Public information services8%N=3137%N=15021%N=867%N=2826%N=106100%N=401 Cable television6%N=2527%N=10922%N=8718%N=7227%N=108100%N=402 Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations)7%N=2628%N=11318%N=737%N=2840%N=163100%N=403 Shakopee open space8%N=3141%N=16624%N=979%N=3718%N=72100%N=403 City-sponsored special events7%N=2832%N=12919%N=7811%N=4231%N=123100%N=401 Overall customer service by Shakopee employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.)17%N=6847%N=18517%N=667%N=2713%N=51100%N=397 Table 45: Question 11 Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following?ExcellentGoodFairPoorDon't knowTotal The City of Shakopee16%N=6549%N=19923%N=924%N=177%N=30100%N=402 The Federal Government6%N=2336%N=14528%N=11316%N=6614%N=55100%N=402 Scott County Government16%N=6645%N=18322%N=887%N=2810%N=39100%N=403 13 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 46: Question 12 Please rate the following categories of Shakopee government performance:ExcellentGoodFairPoorDon't knowTotal The value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee7%N=2736%N=14533%N=13515%N=609%N=37100%N=405 The overall direction that Shakopee is taking12%N=4745%N=18325%N=10111%N=467%N=27100%N=405 The job Shakopee government does at welcoming citizen involvement7%N=2730%N=12126%N=10314%N=5624%N=95100%N=402 Overall confidence in Shakopee government6%N=2442%N=17130%N=12112%N=509%N=38100%N=404 Generally acting in the best interest of the community8%N=3240%N=16226%N=10712%N=5014%N=55100%N=405 Being honest7%N=2836%N=14421%N=8314%N=5723%N=92100%N=404 Treating all residents fairly10%N=4035%N=14123%N=939%N=3723%N=94100%N=405 Table 47: Question 13 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Shakopee community to focus on Very Somewhat Not at all each of the following in the coming two years:EssentialimportantimportantimportantTotal Overall feeling of safety inShakopee52%N=21341%N=1696%N=260%N=0100%N=408 Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit26%N=10350%N=20222%N=873%N=11100%N=403 Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee27%N=11151%N=20720%N=822%N=7100%N=407 Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including overall design, buildings, parks and transportation systems)31%N=12547%N=19120%N=832%N=7100%N=406 Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee29%N=11846%N=18822%N=883%N=12100%N=406 Overall opportunities for education and enrichment37%N=14941%N=16819%N=783%N=12100%N=408 Overall economic health of Shakopee45%N=18445%N=1839%N=371%N=4100%N=408 Sense of community33%N=13649%N=20015%N=632%N=9100%N=407 Table 48: Question 14 To what degree would you support or oppose a more active/strong approach by the City in enforcement of residential property codes?PercentNumber Strongly support30%N=121 Somewhat support47%N=192 Somewhat oppose8%N=33 Strongly oppose4%N=16 Don't know11%N=44 Total100%N=406 Table 49: Question 15 Which of these items, if any, would attract you to Downtown Shakopee more often?PercentNumber Retail39%N=156 Public amenities6%N=25 Public events14%N=58 Restaurants41%N=164 Total100%N=403 14 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 50: Question 16 Please indicate how much of a source, if at all, you consider each of the following to be for obtaining information about the City government and its activities, events and services:Major sourceMinor sourceNot a sourceTotal City website (www.ShakopeeMN.gov)57%N=23030%N=12312%N=50100%N=403 Shakopee Valley News49%N=19837%N=15014%N=58100%N=406 Star Tribune17%N=6733%N=13251%N=203100%N=403 Local government cable channel (Comcast 16/CenturyLink 240)9%N=3530%N=12061%N=246100%N=401 City Newsletter (Hometown Messenger/Parks and Recreation Activity Brochure)35%N=14148%N=19117%N=69100%N=400 Talking with City officials14%N=5734%N=13652%N=206100%N=399 City communications via social media23%N=9145%N=18232%N=128100%N=402 Word-of-mouth27%N=11050%N=20222%N=91100%N=403 Email (E-News, eNotifications)23%N=9341%N=16636%N=143100%N=401 Table 51: Question 17 Please indicate how important, if at all, each of the following projects and Very Somewhat Not at all issues will be for the City to address over the next five years?EssentialimportantimportantimportantDon't knowTotal Redeveloping downtown31%N=12731%N=12628%N=1135%N=214%N=17100%N=404 Improving the riverfront at Huber Park15%N=6223%N=9141%N=16716%N=655%N=19100%N=405 Enhancement and preservation ofnatural resources and open space within the City18%N=7437%N=14934%N=1386%N=235%N=20100%N=403 Improving access to public transportation19%N=7625%N=10131%N=12616%N=649%N=37100%N=404 Construction of a third Fire Station to improve fire and emergency response times 12%N=5026%N=10438%N=15410%N=4114%N=56100%N=405 Table 52: Question D1 How often, if at all, do you do each of the following, considering all of the times you could?NeverRarelySometimesUsuallyAlwaysTotal Recycle at home4%N=171%N=21%N=420%N=8274%N=299100%N=404 Purchase goods or services from a business located in Shakopee1%N=25%N=2131%N=12342%N=16822%N=89100%N=404 Eat at least 5 portions of fruits and vegetables a day3%N=1314%N=5542%N=16627%N=10813%N=51100%N=393 Participate in moderate or vigorous physical activity1%N=618%N=7338%N=15426%N=10316%N=65100%N=401 Read or watch local news (via television, paper, computer, etc.)1%N=613%N=5121%N=8334%N=13731%N=127100%N=404 Vote in local elections7%N=277%N=306%N=2524%N=9556%N=227100%N=404 Table 53: Question D2 Would you say that in general your health is:PercentNumber Excellent22%N=90 Very good50%N=203 Good22%N=89 Fair4%N=18 Poor1%N=6 Total100%N=407 15 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 54: Question D3 What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be:PercentNumber Very positive5%N=19 Somewhat positive25%N=100 Neutral53%N=216 Somewhat negative13%N=53 Very negative4%N=17 Total100%N=405 Table 55: Question D4 What is your employment status?PercentNumber Working full time for pay75%N=306 Working part time for pay8%N=32 Unemployed, looking for paid work3%N=12 Unemployed, not looking for paid work2%N=9 Fully retired12%N=47 Total100%N=406 Table 56: Question D5 Do you work inside the boundaries of Shakopee?PercentNumber Yes, outside the home34%N=137 Yes, from home5%N=21 No60%N=241 Total100%N=399 Table 57: Question D6 Howmany years have you lived in Shakopee?PercentNumber Less than 2 years17%N=70 2 to 5 years20%N=80 6 to 10 years17%N=70 11 to 20 years27%N=112 More than 20 years19%N=75 Total100%N=407 Table 58: Question D7 Whichbest describes the building you live in?PercentNumber One family house detached from any other houses60%N=244 Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, apartment or condominium)38%N=156 Mobile home0%N=0 Other2%N=8 Total100%N=408 16 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 59: Question D8 Is this house, apartment or mobile home...PercentNumber Rented21%N=86 Owned79%N=320 Total100%N=406 Table 60: Question D9 About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)?PercentNumber Less than $300 per month2%N=8 $300 to $599 per month8%N=31 $600 to $999 per month12%N=47 $1,000 to $1,499 per month37%N=147 $1,500 to $2,499 per month34%N=135 $2,500 or more per month8%N=34 Total100%N=402 Table 61: Question D10 Do any children 17 or under live in your household?PercentNumber No50%N=204 Yes50%N=202 Total100%N=406 Table 62: Question D11 Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older?PercentNumber No83%N=338 Yes17%N=71 Total100%N=408 Table 63: Question D12 How muchdo you anticipate your household's total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.)PercentNumber Less than $25,0007%N=29 $25,000 to $49,99918%N=70 $50,000 to $99,99934%N=134 $100,000 to $149,99926%N=105 $150,000 or more15%N=61 Total100%N=398 Table 64: Question D13 Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino?PercentNumber No, not Spanish, Hispanic or Latino96%N=389 Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic or Latino4%N=18 Total100%N=407 17 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 65: Question D14 What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race(s) you consider yourself to be.)PercentNumber American Indian or Alaskan Native2%N=10 Asian, Asian Indian or Pacific Islander11%N=45 Black or African American3%N=13 White85%N=346 Other4%N=16 Total may exceed 100% as respondents could select more than one option. Table 66: Question D15 In which category is your age?PercentNumber 18 to 24 years6%N=25 25 to 34 years29%N=117 35 to 44 years21%N=87 45 to 54 years23%N=94 55 to 64 years8%N=34 65 to 74 years8%N=31 75 years or older5%N=19 Total100%N=408 Table 67: Question D16 What is your sex?PercentNumber Female51%N=202 Male49%N=197 Total100%N=399 Table 68: Question D17 Do you consider a cell phone or landline your primary telephone number?PercentNumber Cell71%N=289 Land line14%N=57 Both15%N=61 Total100%N=407 18 The National Citizen Survey™ Appendix B: Benchmark Comparisons Comparison Data NRC’s database of comparative resident opinion comprisesresident perspectives gathered in surveys from over 500 communities whose residents evaluated the same kinds of topics on The National Citizen Survey™. The comparison evaluations are from the most recentsurvey completed in each community; most communities conduct surveys every year or in alternating years. NRC adds the latest results quickly upon survey completion, keeping the benchmark data fresh and relevant. The communities in the database represent awide geographic and population range.The Cityof Shakopeechose to have comparisons made to the entire databaseanda subset of similar jurisdictions from the database (communities located in the Twin City Metro Area). Benchmark Database Characteristics Interpreting the Results RegionPercent New England3% Ratings are compared when there are at least five communities in which a Middle Atlantic5% similar question was asked. Where comparisons are available, four columns East North Central15% are provided in the table. The first column is Shakopee’s“percent positive.” West North Central13% The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response South Atlantic22% options (i.e., “excellent”and “good,”“very safe”and “somewhat safe,” East South Central3% “essential”and “very important,”etc.), or, in the case of resident West South Central7% behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of Mountain16% respondents indicating “yes”or participating in an activity at least once a month. The second column is the rank assigned to Shakopee’s rating among Pacific16% communities where a similar question was asked. The third column is the PopulationPercent number of communities that asked a similar question. The final column Less than 10,00010% shows the comparison of Shakopee’s rating to the benchmark. 10,000 to 24,99922% 25,000to 49,99923% In that final column, Shakopee’s results are noted as being “higher”than the 50,000 to 99,99922% benchmark, “lower”than the benchmark or “similar”to the benchmark, 100,000 or more23% meaning that the average rating given by Shakopeeresidents is statistically similar to or different (greater or lesser) than the benchmark.More extreme differences are noted as“much higher”or “much lower.” 19 The National Citizen Survey™ National Benchmark Comparisons Table 69: Community Characteristics General Percent positiveRankNumber of communities in comparisonComparison to benchmark The overall quality of life in Shakopee81%308436Similar Overall image or reputation of Shakopee56%244325Lower Shakopee as a place to live85%266372Similar Your neighborhood as a place to live79%209292Similar Shakopee as a place to raise children77%237359Similar Shakopee as a place to retire52%272333Similar Overall appearance of Shakopee68%223334Similar Table 70: Community Characteristics by Facet Number of Percent communities in Comparison to positiveRankcomparisonbenchmark Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee79%191283Similar In your neighborhood during the day92%154335Similar In Shakopee's downtown/commercial area during Safetythe day89%163287Similar Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit80%89198Similar Availability of paths and walking trails69%114290Similar Ease of walking in Shakopee65%140271Similar Ease of travel by bicycle in Shakopee59%109276Similar Ease of travel by public transportation in Shakopee38%89168Similar Ease of travel by car in Shakopee83%44281Higher Ease of public parking73%30163Higher MobilityTraffic flow on major streets73%41330Higher Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee76%169256Similar Cleanliness of Shakopee78%150258Similar Natural EnvironmentAir quality78%126233Similar Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including overall design, buildings, parks and transportation systems)61%109188Similar Overall quality of new development in Shakopee63%87263Similar Availability of affordable quality housing55%84284Similar Variety of housing options63%104257Similar Built EnvironmentPublic places where people want to spend time62%118181Similar Overall economic health of Shakopee66%95193Similar Vibrant downtown/commercial area32%130177Lower Overall quality of business and service establishments in Shakopee57%175253Similar Cost of living in Shakopee51%81190Similar Shopping opportunities45%194273Similar Employment opportunities63%25292Higher Shakopee as a place to visit69%91203Similar EconomyShakopee as a place to work61%157333Similar Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee73%100190Similar Availability of affordable quality mental health care57%51164Similar Availability of preventive health services76%48218Similar Availability of affordable quality health care75%57241Similar Availability of affordable quality food59%174218Similar Recreational opportunities68%162285Similar Recreation and Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and Wellnesspaths or trails, etc.)62%131181Similar 20 The National Citizen Survey™ Number of Percent communities in Comparison to positiveRankcomparisonbenchmark Overall opportunities for education and enrichment66%113190Similar Opportunities to participate in religious or spiritual events and activities69%150186Similar Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities41%219272Lower Adult educationalopportunities51%124170Similar K-12 education70%162247Similar Education and EnrichmentAvailability of affordable quality child care/preschool55%107235Similar Opportunities to participate in social events and activities47%200240Similar Neighborliness of Shakopee54%127184Similar Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds58%171269Similar Opportunities to participate in community matters51%207254Similar Community EngagementOpportunities to volunteer59%219245Similar Table 71: Governance General Percent Number of communities in Comparison to positiveRankcomparisonbenchmark Services provided by the City of Shakopee71%252414Similar Overall customer service by Shakopee employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.)73%233348Similar Value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee47%263379Similar Overall direction that Shakopee is taking61%158296Similar Job Shakopee government does at welcoming citizen involvement48%192295Similar Overall confidence in Shakopee government53%108190Similar Generally acting in the best interest of the community55%111189Similar Being honest55%112182Similar Treating all residents fairly58%87187Similar Services provided by the Federal Government49%54232Similar Table 72: Governance by Facet Number of Percent communities in Comparison to positiveRankcomparisonbenchmark Police services85%184432Similar Fire services91%260357Similar Crime prevention75%166333Similar Fire prevention and education82%139265Similar Animal control69%157321Similar Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other Safetyemergency situations)58%195263Similar Traffic enforcement74%128347Similar Street repair56%155395Similar Street cleaning74%108301Similar Street lighting58%173298Similar Snow removal73%77282Similar Sidewalk maintenance68%71307Similar MobilityTraffic signal timing59%60240Similar Garbage collection84%272338Similar Recycling84%208342Similar Natural EnvironmentShakopee open space59%113174Similar Storm drainage83%37338Higher Built EnvironmentSewer services82%142311Similar 21 The National Citizen Survey™ Number of Percent communities in Comparison to positiveRankcomparisonbenchmark Land use, planning and zoning49%154285Similar Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.)52%203354Similar Cable television46%141182Similar EconomyEconomic development66%84267Similar City parks82%193315Similar Recreation programs or classes69%226320Similar Recreation and WellnessRecreation centers or facilities66%178267Similar Education and EnrichmentCity-sponsored special events57%179209Similar Community EngagementPublic information services61%201269Similar Table 73: Participation General Percent Number of communities in Comparison to positiveRankcomparisonbenchmark Sense of community53%217289Similar Recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks84%168263Similar Remain in Shakopee for the next five years83%152256Similar Contacted Shakopee (in-person, phone, email or web) for help or information41%191291Similar Table 74: Participation by Facet Number of Percent communities in Comparison to positiveRankcomparisonbenchmark Stocked supplies in preparation for an emergency21%152166Lower Did NOT report a crime to the police83%61186Similar Household member was NOT a victim of a Safetycrime91%102255Similar Used bus, rail, subway or other public transportation instead of driving14%98154Lower Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone39%124176Similar MobilityWalked or biked instead of driving53%106182Similar Made efforts to conserve water80%95172Similar Made efforts to make your home more energy efficient78%64172Similar Natural EnvironmentRecycle at home95%64239Similar Did NOT observe a code violation or other hazard in Shakopee65%34177Higher Built EnvironmentNOT experiencing housing costs stress69%115235Similar Purchase goods or services from a business located in Shakopee94%145179Similar Economy will have positive impact on income30%86237Similar EconomyWork inside boundaries of Shakopee40%83179Similar Used Shakopee recreation centers or their services52%159222Similar Visited a neighborhood park or City park87%93253Similar Eat at least 5 portions of fruits and vegetables a day83%100173Similar Participate in moderate or vigorous physical activity80%142177Similar Recreation and WellnessIn very good to excellent health72%58176Similar 22 The National Citizen Survey™ Number of Percent communities in Comparison to positiveRankcomparisonbenchmark Used Shakopee public libraries or their services59%155222Similar Participated in religious or spiritual activities in Shakopee40%130186Similar Education and EnrichmentAttended City-sponsored event41%149181Lower Campaigned or advocated for anissue, cause or candidate19%106165Similar Contacted Shakopee elected officials (in- person, phone, email or web) to express your opinion13%143179Similar Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Shakopee31%183243Similar Participatedin a club19%186222Similar Talked to or visited with your immediate neighbors91%85177Similar Done a favor for a neighbor76%142171Similar Attended a local public meeting 16%191245Similar Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting21%135209Similar Read or watch local news (via television, paper, computer, etc.)86%95180Similar Community EngagementVote in local elections86%57237Similar Communities included in national comparisons The communities included in Shakopee’scomparisons are listed on the following pages along with their population according to the 2010 Census. Airway Heights city, WA.............................................6,114 Bainbridge Island city, WA........................................23,025 Albany city, OR........................................................50,158 Baltimore city, MD...................................................620,961 Albemarle County, VA...............................................98,970 Bartonville town, TX...................................................1,469 Albert Lea city, MN...................................................18,016 Battle Creek city, MI.................................................52,347 Alexandria city, VA..................................................139,966Bay City city, MI.......................................................34,932 Algonquin village, IL.................................................30,046Baytown city, TX......................................................71,802 Aliso Viejo city, CA...................................................47,823Bedford city, TX.......................................................46,979 Altoona city, IA........................................................14,541Bedford town, MA....................................................13,320 American Canyon city, CA.........................................19,454Bellevue city, WA....................................................122,363 Ames city, IA...........................................................58,965Bellingham city, WA.................................................80,885 Andover CDP, MA.......................................................8,762Beltrami County, MN................................................44,442 Ankeny city, IA........................................................45,582Benbrook city, TX.....................................................21,234 Ann Arbor city, MI...................................................113,934Bend city, OR...........................................................76,639 Annapolis city,MD...................................................38,394Bettendorf city, IA....................................................33,217 Apache Junction city, AZ...........................................35,840Billings city, MT.......................................................104,170 Apple Valley town, CA..............................................69,135Blaine city, MN.........................................................57,186 Arapahoe County, CO..............................................572,003Bloomfield Hills city, MI..............................................3,869 Arkansas City city, AR....................................................366Bloomington city, MN...............................................82,893 Arlington County, VA...............................................207,627Blue Springs city, MO...............................................52,575 Arvada city, CO.......................................................106,433Boise City city, ID....................................................205,671 Asheville city, NC.....................................................83,393Boone County, KY...................................................118,811 Ashland city, OR......................................................20,078Boulder city, CO.......................................................97,385 Ashland town, MA....................................................16,593Bowling Green city, KY.............................................58,067 Ashland town, VA.......................................................7,225Bozeman city, MT....................................................37,280 Aspen city, CO...........................................................6,658Brentwood city, MO....................................................8,055 Athens-Clarke County, GA........................................115,452Brentwood city, TN..................................................37,060 Auburn city, AL........................................................53,380Brighton city, CO......................................................33,352 Auburn city, WA.......................................................70,180Brighton city, MI........................................................7,444 Augusta CCD, GA....................................................134,777Bristol city, TN.........................................................26,702 Aurora city, CO.......................................................325,078Broken Arrow city, OK..............................................98,850 Austin city, TX........................................................790,390Brookfield city, WI...................................................37,920 Avon town, CO...........................................................6,447Brookline CDP, MA...................................................58,732 Avondale city, AZ.....................................................76,238Broomfield city, CO..................................................55,889 Azusa city, CA..........................................................46,361Brownsburg town, IN...............................................21,285 23 The National Citizen Survey™ Burien city, WA........................................................33,313Decatur city, GA.......................................................19,335 Burleson city, TX......................................................36,690Del Mar city, CA.........................................................4,161 Cabarrus County, NC...............................................178,011Delaware city, OH....................................................34,753 Cambridge city, MA.................................................105,162Delray Beach city, FL................................................60,522 Cannon Beach city,OR...............................................1,690Denison city, TX.......................................................22,682 Cañon City city, CO..................................................16,400Denton city, TX.......................................................113,383 Canton city, SD..........................................................3,057Denver city, CO.......................................................600,158 Cape Coral city, FL..................................................154,305Derby city, KS..........................................................22,158 Cape Girardeau city, MO...........................................37,941Des Moines city, IA.................................................203,433 Carlisle borough, PA.................................................18,682Des Peres city, MO.....................................................8,373 Carlsbad city, CA.....................................................105,328Destin city, FL..........................................................12,305 Carroll city, IA..........................................................10,103Dothan city, AL........................................................65,496 Cartersville city, GA..................................................19,731Douglas County, CO................................................285,465 Cary town, NC........................................................135,234Dover city, NH.........................................................29,987 Casper city, WY.......................................................55,316Dublin city, CA.........................................................46,036 Castine town, ME.......................................................1,366Dublin city, OH........................................................41,751 Castle Pines North city, CO.......................................10,360Duluth city, MN........................................................86,265 Castle Rock town, CO...............................................48,231Duncanville city, TX..................................................38,524 Cedar Hill city, TX....................................................45,028Durham city, NC.....................................................228,330 Cedar Rapids city, IA...............................................126,326Durham County, NC................................................267,587 Celina city, TX............................................................6,028Eagan city, MN.........................................................64,206 Centennial city, CO..................................................100,377Eagle Mountain city, UT............................................21,415 Chambersburg borough, PA......................................20,268Eagle town, CO..........................................................6,508 Chandler city, AZ....................................................236,123East Baton Rouge Parish, LA....................................440,171 Chandler city, TX.......................................................2,734East Grand Forks city, MN...........................................8,601 Chanhassen city, MN................................................22,952East Lansing city, MI................................................48,579 Chapel Hill town, NC................................................57,233Eau Claire city, WI...................................................65,883 Charles County, MD.................................................146,551Eden Prairie city, MN................................................60,797 Charlotte city, NC....................................................731,424Edgerton city, KS.......................................................1,671 Charlotte County, FL...............................................159,978Edgewater city, CO....................................................5,170 Charlottesville city, VA..............................................43,475Edina city, MN.........................................................47,941 Chattanooga city, TN...............................................167,674Edmond city, OK......................................................81,405 Chesterfield County, VA...........................................316,236Edmonds city, WA....................................................39,709 Chippewa Falls city, WI............................................13,661El Cerrito city, CA.....................................................23,549 Citrus Heights city, CA..............................................83,301El Dorado County, CA..............................................181,058 Clackamas County, OR............................................375,992El Paso city, TX.......................................................649,121 Clarendon Hills village, IL...........................................8,427Elk Grove city, CA...................................................153,015 Clayton city, MO......................................................15,939Elk River city, MN.....................................................22,974 Clearwater city, FL..................................................107,685Elko New Market city, MN...........................................4,110 Cleveland Heights city, OH........................................46,121Elmhurst city, IL.......................................................44,121 Clinton city, SC..........................................................8,490Encinitas city, CA.....................................................59,518 Clive city, IA............................................................15,447Englewood city, CO..................................................30,255 Clovis city, CA..........................................................95,631Erie town, CO..........................................................18,135 College Park city, MD...............................................30,413Escambia County, FL...............................................297,619 College Station city, TX............................................93,857Estes Park town, CO...................................................5,858 Colleyville city, TX....................................................22,807Fairview town, TX......................................................7,248 Collinsville city, IL....................................................25,579Farmersville city, TX...................................................3,301 Columbia city, SC....................................................129,272Farmington Hills city, MI...........................................79,740 Columbia Falls city, MT...............................................4,688Fayetteville city, NC.................................................200,564 Columbus city, WI......................................................4,991Fisherstown, IN......................................................76,794 Commerce City city, CO............................................45,913Flower Mound town, TX............................................64,669 Concord city, CA.....................................................122,067Forest Grove city, OR...............................................21,083 Concord town, MA....................................................17,668Fort Collins city, CO.................................................143,986 Coon Rapids city, MN...............................................61,476Fort Lauderdale city, FL...........................................165,521 Copperas Cove city, TX.............................................32,032Fort Smith city, AR...................................................86,209 Coronado city, CA....................................................18,912Fort Worth city, TX..................................................741,206 Corvallis city, OR......................................................54,462Fountain Hills town, AZ.............................................22,489 Cottonwood Heights city, UT....................................33,433Franklin city, TN.......................................................62,487 Creve Coeur city, MO...............................................17,833Fredericksburg city, VA.............................................24,286 Cross Roads town, TX................................................1,563Fremont city, CA.....................................................214,089 Dacono city, CO.........................................................4,152Friendswood city, TX................................................35,805 Dade City city, FL.......................................................6,437Fruita city, CO..........................................................12,646 Dakota County, MN.................................................398,552Gahanna city, OH.....................................................33,248 Dallas city, OR.........................................................14,583Gaithersburg city, MD...............................................59,933 Dallas city, TX......................................................1,197,816Galveston city, TX....................................................47,743 Danville city, KY.......................................................16,218Gardner city, KS.......................................................19,123 Dardenne Prairie city, MO.........................................11,494Geneva city, NY.......................................................13,261 Davenport city, IA....................................................99,685Georgetown city, TX.................................................47,400 Davidson town, NC...................................................10,944Germantown city, TN...............................................38,844 Dayton city, OH......................................................141,527Gilbert town, AZ......................................................208,453 24 The National Citizen Survey™ Gillette city, WY.......................................................29,087Kettering city, OH....................................................56,163 Glendora city, CA.....................................................50,073Key West city, FL.....................................................24,649 Glenview village, IL..................................................44,692King City city, CA.....................................................12,874 Globe city, AZ............................................................7,532King County, WA..................................................1,931,249 Golden city, CO........................................................18,867Kirkland city, WA......................................................48,787 Golden Valley city, MN..............................................20,371Kirkwood city,MO....................................................27,540 Goodyear city, AZ....................................................65,275Knoxville city, IA........................................................7,313 Grafton village, WI...................................................11,459La Mesa city, CA......................................................57,065 Grand Blanc city, MI...................................................8,276La Plata town, MD......................................................8,753 Grand Island city, NE...............................................48,520La Porte city, TX......................................................33,800 Grants Pass city, OR.................................................34,533La Vista city, NE.......................................................15,758 Grass Valley city, CA.................................................12,860Lafayette city, CO....................................................24,453 Greenville city, NC....................................................84,554Laguna Beach city, CA..............................................22,723 Greenwich town, CT.................................................61,171Laguna Hills city, CA.................................................30,344 Greenwood Village city, CO.......................................13,925Laguna Niguel city, CA.............................................62,979 Greer city, SC..........................................................25,515Lake Forest city, IL...................................................19,375 Guilford County, NC................................................488,406Lake Oswego city, OR..............................................36,619 Gunnison County, CO...............................................15,324Lake Stevens city, WA..............................................28,069 Hailey city, ID............................................................7,960Lake Worth city, FL..................................................34,910 Haines Borough, AK...................................................2,508Lake Zurich village, IL..............................................19,631 Hallandale Beach city, FL..........................................37,113Lakeville city, MN.....................................................55,954 Hamilton city, OH.....................................................62,477Lakewood city, CO..................................................142,980 Hanover County, VA.................................................99,863Lakewood city, WA...................................................58,163 Harrisburg city, SD.....................................................4,089Lane County, OR.....................................................351,715 Harrisonburg city, VA...............................................48,914Lansing city, MI......................................................114,297 Harrisonville city, MO...............................................10,019Laramie city, WY......................................................30,816 Hayward city, CA....................................................144,186Larimer County, CO.................................................299,630 Henderson city, NV.................................................257,729Las Vegas city, NV..................................................583,756 Herndon town, VA....................................................23,292Lawrence city, KS.....................................................87,643 High Point city, NC..................................................104,371Lee's Summit city, MO..............................................91,364 Highland Park city, IL...............................................29,763Lehi city, UT............................................................47,407 Highlands Ranch CDP, CO........................................96,713Lenexa city, KS........................................................48,190 Holland city, MI........................................................33,051Lewis County, NY.....................................................27,087 Honolulu County, HI................................................953,207Lewiston city, ID......................................................31,894 Hooksett town, NH...................................................13,451Lewisville city, TX.....................................................95,290 Hopkins city, MN......................................................17,591Libertyville village, IL................................................20,315 Hopkinton town, MA.................................................14,925Lincoln city, NE.......................................................258,379 Hoquiam city, WA......................................................8,726Lindsborg city, KS......................................................3,458 Horry County, SC....................................................269,291Little Chute village, WI.............................................10,449 Howard village, WI...................................................17,399Littleton city, CO......................................................41,737 Hudson city, OH.......................................................22,262Livermore city, CA....................................................80,968 Hudson town, CO.......................................................2,356Lombard village, IL..................................................43,165 Hudsonville city, MI....................................................7,116Lone Tree city, CO...................................................10,218 Huntersville town, NC...............................................46,773Long Grove village, IL................................................8,043 Huntley village, IL....................................................24,291Longmont city, CO...................................................86,270 Hurst city, TX...........................................................37,337Longview city, TX.....................................................80,455 Hutchinson city, MN.................................................14,178Lonsdale city, MN.......................................................3,674 Hutto city, TX..........................................................14,698Los Alamos County, NM............................................17,950 Hyattsville city, MD..................................................17,557Los Altos Hills town, CA..............................................7,922 Independence city, MO............................................116,830Louisville city, CO.....................................................18,376 Indian Trail town, NC...............................................33,518Lower Merion township, PA.......................................57,825 Indianola city, IA.....................................................14,782Lynchburg city, VA...................................................75,568 Iowa City city, IA.....................................................67,862Lynnwood city, WA..................................................35,836 Irving city, TX.........................................................216,290Macomb County, MI................................................840,978 Issaquah city, WA....................................................30,434Manhattan Beach city, CA.........................................35,135 Jackson County, MI.................................................160,248Manhattan city, KS...................................................52,281 JamesCity County, VA.............................................67,009Mankato city, MN.....................................................39,309 Jefferson County, NY...............................................116,229Maple Grove city, MN...............................................61,567 Jefferson Parish, LA.................................................432,552Maricopa County, AZ............................................3,817,117 Johnson City city, TN................................................63,152Marshfield city, WI...................................................19,118 Johnston city, IA......................................................17,278Martinez city, CA......................................................35,824 Jupiter town, FL.......................................................55,156Marysville city, WA...................................................60,020 Kansas City city, KS.................................................145,786Matthews town, NC..................................................27,198 Kansas City city, MO................................................459,787McAllen city, TX......................................................129,877 Keizer city, OR.........................................................36,478McDonough city, GA.................................................22,084 Kenmore city, WA....................................................20,460McKinney city, TX....................................................131,117 Kennedale city, TX.....................................................6,763McMinnville city, OR.................................................32,187 Kennett Square borough, PA.......................................6,072Menlo Park city, CA..................................................32,026 Kent city, WA...........................................................92,411Mercer Island city, WA.............................................22,699 Kerrville city, TX.......................................................22,347Meridian charter township, MI..................................39,688 25 The National Citizen Survey™ Meridian city, ID......................................................75,092Parker town, CO......................................................45,297 Merriam city, KS.......................................................11,003Parkland city, FL......................................................23,962 Mesa city, AZ..........................................................439,041Pasadena city, CA...................................................137,122 Mesa County, CO....................................................146,723Pasco city, WA.........................................................59,781 Miami Beach city, FL................................................87,779Pasco County, FL....................................................464,697 Miami city, FL.........................................................399,457Payette city, ID..........................................................7,433 Middleton city, WI....................................................17,442Pearland city, TX......................................................91,252 Midland city, MI.......................................................41,863Peoria city, AZ........................................................154,065 Milford city, DE..........................................................9,559Peoria city, IL.........................................................115,007 Milton city, GA.........................................................32,661Peoria County, IL....................................................186,494 Minneapolis city, MN...............................................382,578Pflugerville city, TX..................................................46,936 Mission Viejo city, CA...............................................93,305Phoenix city, AZ...................................................1,445,632 Modesto city, CA.....................................................201,165Pinehurst village, NC................................................13,124 Monterey city, CA.....................................................27,810Piqua city, OH..........................................................20,522 Montgomery County, VA...........................................94,392Pitkin County, CO.....................................................17,148 Monticello city, UT......................................................1,972Plano city, TX.........................................................259,841 Monument town, CO..................................................5,530Platte City city, MO.....................................................4,691 Mooresville town, NC................................................32,711Plymouth city, MN....................................................70,576 Moraga town, CA.....................................................16,016Pocatello city, ID......................................................54,255 Morristown city, TN..................................................29,137Polk County, IA.......................................................430,640 Morrisville town, NC.................................................18,576Pompano Beach city, FL...........................................99,845 Morro Bay city, CA...................................................10,234Port Orange city, FL.................................................56,048 Mountain Village town, CO..........................................1,320Portland city, OR.....................................................583,776 Mountlake Terrace city, WA......................................19,909Post Falls city, ID.....................................................27,574 Murphy city, TX........................................................17,708Powell city, OH........................................................11,500 Naperville city, IL....................................................141,853Prince William County, VA........................................402,002 Napoleon city, OH......................................................8,749Prior Lake city, MN...................................................22,796 Needham CDP, MA...................................................28,886Pueblo city, CO.......................................................106,595 New Braunfels city, TX.............................................57,740Purcellville town, VA...................................................7,727 New Brighton city, MN..............................................21,456Queen Creek town, AZ.............................................26,361 New Hanover County, NC........................................202,667Radnor township, PA................................................31,531 New Orleans city, LA...............................................343,829Ramsey city, MN......................................................23,668 New Smyrna Beach city, FL......................................22,464Raymond town, ME....................................................4,436 New Ulm city, MN....................................................13,522Raymore city, MO....................................................19,206 Newberg city, OR.....................................................22,068Redmond city, OR....................................................26,215 Newport city, RI.......................................................24,672Redmond city, WA...................................................54,144 Newport News city, VA............................................180,719Rehoboth Beach city, DE............................................1,327 Newton city, IA........................................................15,254Reno city, NV..........................................................225,221 Noblesville city, IN...................................................51,969Reston CDP, VA.......................................................58,404 Nogales city, AZ.......................................................20,837Richmond city, CA...................................................103,701 Norcross city, GA.......................................................9,116Richmond Heights city, MO.........................................8,603 Norfolk city, VA.......................................................242,803Rifle city, CO..............................................................9,172 North Port city, FL....................................................57,357Rio Rancho city, NM.................................................87,521 North Richland Hills city, TX......................................63,343River Falls city, WI...................................................15,000 Northglenn city, CO..................................................35,789Riverside city, CA....................................................303,871 Novato city, CA........................................................51,904Riverside city, MO......................................................2,937 Novi city, MI............................................................55,224Roanoke County, VA................................................92,376 O'Fallon city, IL........................................................28,281Rochester Hills city, MI.............................................70,995 O'Fallon city, MO......................................................79,329Rock Hill city, SC......................................................66,154 Oak Park village, IL..................................................51,878Rockville city, MD.....................................................61,209 Oakland city, CA.....................................................390,724Roeland Park city, KS.................................................6,731 Oakley city, CA........................................................35,432Rogers city, MN.........................................................8,597 Ogdensburg city, NY................................................11,128Rohnert Park city, CA...............................................40,971 Oklahoma City city, OK............................................579,999Rolla city, MO..........................................................19,559 Olathe city, KS........................................................125,872Roselle village, IL.....................................................22,763 Old Town city, ME......................................................7,840Rosemount city, MN.................................................21,874 Olmsted County, MN...............................................144,248Rosenberg city, TX...................................................30,618 Olympia city, WA.....................................................46,478Roseville city, MN.....................................................33,660 Orland Park village, IL..............................................56,767Round Rock city, TX.................................................99,887 Oshkosh city, WI......................................................66,083Royal Oak city, MI....................................................57,236 Oshtemo charter township, MI..................................21,705Saco city, ME...........................................................18,482 Otsego County, MI...................................................24,164Sahuarita town, AZ..................................................25,259 Oviedo city, FL.........................................................33,342Salida city, CO...........................................................5,236 Paducah city, KY......................................................25,024Sammamish city, WA................................................45,780 Palm Beach Gardens city, FL.....................................48,452San Anselmo town, CA.............................................12,336 Palm Coast city, FL...................................................75,180San Antonio city, TX.............................................1,327,407 Palo Alto city, CA.....................................................64,403San Carlos city, CA...................................................28,406 Papillion city, NE......................................................18,894San Diego city, CA...............................................1,307,402 Paradise Valley town, AZ..........................................12,820San Francisco city, CA.............................................805,235 Park City city, UT.......................................................7,558San Jose city, CA....................................................945,942 26 The National Citizen Survey™ San Juan County, NM..............................................130,044Texarkana city, TX...................................................36,411 San Marcos city, CA..................................................83,781The Woodlands CDP, TX...........................................93,847 San Marcos city, TX..................................................44,894Thornton city, CO....................................................118,772 San Rafael city, CA...................................................57,713Thousand Oaks city, CA...........................................126,683 Sanford city, FL........................................................53,570Tigard city, OR.........................................................48,035 Sangamon County, IL..............................................197,465Tracy city, CA..........................................................82,922 Santa Clarita city, CA...............................................176,320Trinidad CCD, CO.....................................................12,017 Santa Fe County, NM..............................................144,170Tualatin city, OR......................................................26,054 Santa Monica city, CA...............................................89,736Tulsa city, OK.........................................................391,906 Sarasota County, FL................................................379,448Twin Falls city, ID....................................................44,125 Savage city, MN.......................................................26,911Tyler city, TX...........................................................96,900 Schaumburg village, IL.............................................74,227Umatilla city, OR........................................................6,906 Scott County, MN....................................................129,928University Park city, TX.............................................23,068 Scottsdale city, AZ..................................................217,385Upper Arlington city, OH...........................................33,771 Seaside city, CA.......................................................33,025Urbandale city, IA....................................................39,463 Sevierville city, TN....................................................14,807Vail town, CO.............................................................5,305 Shakopee city, MN...................................................37,076Vancouver city, WA.................................................161,791 Shawnee city, KS.....................................................62,209Ventura CCD, CA.....................................................111,889 Sheboygan city, WI..................................................49,288Vernon Hills village, IL..............................................25,113 Sherborn town, MA....................................................4,119Vestavia Hills city, AL...............................................34,033 Shoreview city, MN..................................................25,043Victoria city, MN.........................................................7,345 Shorewood city, MN...................................................7,307Vienna town, VA......................................................15,687 Shorewood village, IL...............................................15,615Virginia Beach city, VA.............................................437,994 Shorewood village, WI.............................................13,162Wake Forest town, NC..............................................30,117 Sierra Vista city, AZ..................................................43,888Walnut Creek city, CA...............................................64,173 Sioux Center city, IA..................................................7,048Washington County, MN..........................................238,136 Sioux Falls city, SD..................................................153,888Washington town, NH................................................1,123 Skokie village, IL......................................................64,784Washougal city, WA.................................................14,095 Snellville city, GA.....................................................18,242Watauga city, TX.....................................................23,497 South Lake Tahoe city, CA........................................21,403Wauwatosa city, WI.................................................46,396 Southborough town, MA.............................................9,767Waverly city, IA.........................................................9,874 Southlake city, TX....................................................26,575Weddington town, NC................................................9,459 Spokane Valley city, WA...........................................89,755Wentzville city, MO...................................................29,070 Spring Hill city, KS......................................................5,437West Carrollton city, OH...........................................13,143 Springboro city, OH..................................................17,409West Chester borough, PA........................................18,461 Springfield city, MO.................................................159,498West Des Moines city, IA..........................................56,609 Springville city, UT...................................................29,466Western Springs village, IL.......................................12,975 St. Augustine city, FL...............................................12,975Westerville city, OH..................................................36,120 St. Charles city, IL....................................................32,974Westlake town, TX........................................................992 St. Cloud city, FL......................................................35,183Westminster city, CO...............................................106,114 St. Cloud city, MN....................................................65,842Weston town, MA.....................................................11,261 St. Joseph city, MO..................................................76,780White House city, TN................................................10,255 St. Louis County, MN...............................................200,226Wichita city, KS.......................................................382,368 St. Louis Park city, MN.............................................45,250Williamsburg city, VA................................................14,068 Stallings town, NC....................................................13,831Willowbrook village, IL...............................................8,540 State College borough, PA........................................42,034Wilmington city, NC.................................................106,476 Steamboat Springs city, CO......................................12,088Wilsonville city, OR...................................................19,509 Sterling Heights city, MI..........................................129,699Winchester city, VA..................................................26,203 Sugar Grove village, IL...............................................8,997Windsor town, CO....................................................18,644 Sugar Land city, TX..................................................78,817Windsor town, CT....................................................29,044 Suisun City city, CA..................................................28,111Winnetka village, IL.................................................12,187 Summit city, NJ........................................................21,457Winston-Salem city, NC...........................................229,617 Summit County, UT..................................................36,324Winter Garden city, FL..............................................34,568 Summit village, IL....................................................11,054Woodbury city, MN...................................................61,961 Sunnyvale city, CA..................................................140,081Woodland city, CA....................................................55,468 Surprise city, AZ......................................................117,517Wrentham town, MA................................................10,955 Suwanee city, GA.....................................................15,355Wyandotte County, KS............................................157,505 Tacoma city, WA.....................................................198,397Yakima city, WA.......................................................91,067 Takoma Park city, MD..............................................16,715York County, VA.......................................................65,464 Tamarac city, FL......................................................60,427Yorktown town, IN.....................................................9,405 Temecula city, CA...................................................100,097Yountville city, CA......................................................2,933 Tempe city, AZ.......................................................161,719 27 The National Citizen Survey™ Twin City Metro Area Comparisons Table 75: Community Characteristics General Percent positiveRankNumber of communities in comparisonComparison to benchmark The overall quality of life in Shakopee81%1214Similar Overall image or reputation of Shakopee56%910Lower Shakopee as a place to live85%910Lower Your neighborhood as a place to live79%1010Similar Shakopee as a place to raise children77%89Lower Shakopee as a place to retire52%99Lower Overall appearance of Shakopee68%1010Similar Table 76: Community Characteristics by Facet Number of Percent communities in Comparison to positiveRankcomparisonbenchmark Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee79%89Similar In your neighborhood during the day92%79Similar In Shakopee's downtown/commercial area during Safetythe day89%88Similar Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit80%88Similar Availability of paths and walking trails69%79Similar Ease of walking in Shakopee65%89Similar Ease of travel by bicycle in Shakopee59%69Similar Ease of travel by public transportation in Shakopee38%56Similar Ease of travel by car in Shakopee83%49Similar Ease of public parking73%NANANA MobilityTraffic flow on major streets73%38Similar Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee76%78Similar Cleanliness of Shakopee78%89Similar Natural EnvironmentAir quality78%66Similar Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including overall design, buildings, parks and transportation systems)61%66Similar Overall quality of new development inShakopee63%67Similar Availability of affordable quality housing55%89Similar Variety of housing options63%810Similar Built EnvironmentPublic places where people want to spend time62%66Similar Overall economic health of Shakopee66%67Lower Vibrant downtown/commercial area32%55Lower Overall quality of business and service establishments in Shakopee57%1010Lower Cost of living in Shakopee51%56Similar Shopping opportunities45%910Lower Employment opportunities63%49Similar Shakopee as a place to visit69%46Similar EconomyShakopee as a place to work61%79Similar Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee73%67Similar Availability of affordable quality mental health care57%55Similar Availability of preventive health services76%45Similar Availability of affordable quality health care75%56Similar Availability of affordable quality food59%55Lower Recreational opportunities68%99Similar Recreation and Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and Wellnesspaths or trails, etc.)62%66Lower 28 The National Citizen Survey™ Number of Percent communities in Comparison to positiveRankcomparisonbenchmark Overall opportunities for education and enrichment66%67Lower Opportunities to participate in religious or spiritual events and activities69%NANANA Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities41%88Lower Adult educational opportunities51%66Lower K-12 education70%77Lower Education and EnrichmentAvailability of affordable quality child care/preschool55%55Similar Opportunities to participate in social events and activities47%66Similar Neighborliness of Shakopee54%56Similar Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds58%68Similar Opportunities to participate in community matters51%66Similar Community EngagementOpportunities to volunteer59%88Similar Table 77: Governance General Percent Number of communities in Comparison to positiveRankcomparisonbenchmark Services provided by the City of Shakopee71%1112Similar Overall customer service by Shakopee employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.)73%1214Similar Value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee47%1414Lower Overall direction that Shakopee is taking61%99Similar Job Shakopee government does at welcoming citizen involvement48%1010Similar Overall confidence in Shakopee government53%77Similar Generally acting in the best interest of the community55%77Similar Being honest55%55Lower Treating all residents fairly58%77Similar Services provided by the Federal Government49%35Similar Table 78: Governance by Facet Number of Percent communities in Comparison to positiveRankcomparisonbenchmark Police services85%1315Similar Fire services91%1315Similar Crime prevention75%89Similar Fire prevention and education82%99Similar Animal control69%1115Similar Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other Safetyemergency situations)58%66Similar Traffic enforcement74%89Similar Street repair56%714Similar Street cleaning74%89Similar Street lighting58%1415Similar Snow removal73%717Similar Sidewalkmaintenance68%810Similar MobilityTraffic signal timing59%49Similar Garbage collection84%78Similar Recycling84%1012Similar Natural EnvironmentShakopee open space59%77Similar Storm drainage83%411Similar Built EnvironmentSewer services82%1212Similar 29 The National Citizen Survey™ Number of Percent communities in Comparison to positiveRankcomparisonbenchmark Land use, planning and zoning49%99Similar Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.)52%79Similar Cable television46%46Similar EconomyEconomic development66%59Similar City parks82%99Similar Recreation programs or classes69%1314Similar Recreation and WellnessRecreation centers or facilities66%78Similar Education and EnrichmentCity-sponsored special events57%66Lower Community EngagementPublic information services61%99Lower Table 79: Participation General Percent Number of communities in Comparison to positiveRankcomparisonbenchmark Sense of community53%910Similar Recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks84%67Similar Remain in Shakopee for the next five years83%77Similar Contacted Shakopee (in-person, phone, email or web) for help or information41%68Similar Table 80: Participation by Facet Number of Percent communities in Comparison to positiveRankcomparisonbenchmark Stocked supplies in preparation for an emergency21%NANANA Did NOT report a crime to the police83%35Similar Household member was NOT a victim of a Safetycrime91%47Similar Used bus, rail, subway or other public transportation instead of driving14%45Similar Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone39%55Similar MobilityWalked or biked instead of driving53%45Similar Made efforts to conserve water80%35Similar Made efforts to make your home more energy efficient78%NANANA Natural EnvironmentRecycle at home95%47Similar Did NOT observe a code violation or other hazard in Shakopee65%25Similar Built EnvironmentNOT experiencing housing costs stress69%55Similar Purchase goods or services from a business located in Shakopee94%55Similar Economy will have positive impact on income30%35Similar EconomyWork inside boundaries of Shakopee40%15Higher Used Shakopee recreation centers or their services52%57Similar Visited a neighborhood park or City park87%58Similar Eat at least 5 portions of fruits and vegetables a day83%45Similar Participate in moderate or vigorous physical activity80%45Similar Recreation and WellnessIn very good to excellent health72%35Similar 30 The National Citizen Survey™ Number of Percent communities in Comparison to positiveRankcomparisonbenchmark Used Shakopee public libraries or their services59%67Similar Participated in religious or spiritual activities in Shakopee40%NANANA Education and EnrichmentAttended City-sponsored event41%45Similar Campaigned or advocated for an issue, cause or candidate19%NANANA Contacted Shakopee elected officials (in- person, phone, email or web) to express your opinion13%45Similar Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Shakopee31%58Similar Participated in a club19%57Similar Talked to or visited with your immediate neighbors91%35Similar Done a favor for a neighbor76%55Similar Attended a local public meeting 16%58Similar Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting21%58Similar Read or watch local news (via television, paper, computer, etc.)86%45Similar Community EngagementVote in local elections86%37Similar Communities included in Twin City Metro Areacomparisons The communities included in Shakopee’s custom comparisons are listed belowalong with their population according to the 2010 Census. Blaine city, MN.........................................................57,186 New Brighton city, MN..............................................21,456 Bloomington city, MN...............................................82,893 Plymouth city, MN....................................................70,576 Chanhassencity, MN................................................22,952 Prior Lake city, MN...................................................22,796 Coon Rapids city, MN...............................................61,476 Rosemount city, MN.................................................21,874 Edina city, MN.........................................................47,941Savage city, MN.......................................................26,911 Elk River city, MN.....................................................22,974Shakopee city, MN...................................................37,076 Golden Valley city, MN..............................................20,371Shoreview city, MN..................................................25,043 Hopkins city, MN......................................................17,591St. Cloud city, MN....................................................65,842 Maple Grove city, MN...............................................61,567St. Louis Park city, MN.............................................45,250 Minneapolis city, MN...............................................382,578Woodbury city, MN...................................................61,961 31 The National Citizen Survey™ Appendix C: Detailed Survey Methods The National Citizen Survey (The NCS™), conducted by National Research Center, Inc., was developed to provide communities an accurate, affordable and easy way to assess and interpret resident opinion about important local topics. Standardization of common questions and survey methods provide the rigor to assure valid results, and each community has enough flexibility to construct a customized version of The NCS. Results offer insight into residents’perspectives about the community as a whole, including local amenities, services, public trust, resident participation and other aspects of thecommunity in order to support budgeting, land use and strategic planning and communication with residents. Resident demographic characteristics permit comparison to the Census as well as comparison of results for different subgroups of residents.The Cityof Shakopeefunded this research. Please contact Nathan Burkett, Assistant City Administrator of theCityof Shakopee, at Nburkett@shakopeemn.govif you have any questions about the survey. Survey Validity The question of survey validity has two parts: 1)how can a communitybe confident that the results from those who completed the questionnaire are representative of the results that would have been obtained had the survey been administered to the entire population? and 2) how closely do the perspectives recorded on the survey reflect what residents really believe or do? To answer the first question, the best survey research practices were used for the resources spent to ensure that the results from the survey respondents reflect the opinions of residents in the entire community. These practices include: Using a mail-out/mail-back methodology, which typically gets a higher response rate than phone for the same dollars spent. A higher response rate lessens the worry that those who did not respond are different than those who did respond. Selecting households at random within the community to receive the survey to ensure that the households selected to receive the survey are representative of the larger community. Over-sampling multi-family housing units to improve response from hard-to-reach, lower income or younger apartment dwellers. Selecting the respondent within the household using an unbiased sampling procedure; in this case, the “birthday method.”The cover letter included an instruction requesting thatthe respondent in the household be the adult (18 years old or older) who most recently had a birthday, irrespective of year of birth. Contacting potential respondents three times to encourage response from people who may have different opinions or habits than those who would respond with only a single prompt. Inviting response in a compelling manner (using appropriate letterhead/logos and a signature of a visible leader) to appeal to recipients’sense of civic responsibility. Providing a pre-addressed, postage-paid return envelope. Offering the survey in Spanish or other language when requested by a given community. Weighting the results to reflect the demographics of the population. The answer to the second question about how closely the perspectives recorded on the survey reflect what residents really believe or do is more complex. Resident responses to surveys are influenced by a variety of factors. For questions about service quality, residents’expectations for service quality play a role as well as the“objective” quality of the service provided, the way the resident perceives the entire community (that is, the context in which the service is provided), the scale on which the resident is asked to record his or her opinion and, of course, the opinion, itself, that aresident holds about the service. Similarly a resident’s report of certain behaviors is colored by what he or she believes is the socially desirable response (e.g., reporting tolerant behaviors toward “oppressed groups,”likelihood of voting for a tax increase for services to poor people, use of alternative modes of travel to work besides the single occupancy vehicle), his or her memory of the actual behavior (if it is not a question speculating about future actions, like a vote), his or her confidence that he or she can be honest without suffering any negative consequences (thus the need for anonymity) as well as the actual behavior itself. How closely survey results come to recording the way a person really feels or behaves often is measured by the coincidence of reported behavior with observed current behavior (e.g., driving habits), reported intentions to behave with observed future behavior (e.g., voting choices) or reported opinions about current community quality 32 The National Citizen Survey™ with objective characteristics of thecommunity (e.g., feelings of safety correlated with rates of crime). There is a body of scientific literature that has investigated the relationship between reported behaviors and actual behaviors. Well-conducted surveys, by and large, do capture true respondent behaviors or intentions to act with great accuracy. Predictions of voting outcomes tend to be quite accurate using survey research, as do reported behaviors that are not about highly sensitive issues (e.g., family abuse or other illegal or morally sanctioned activities). For self-reports about highly sensitive issues, statistical adjustments can be made to correct for the respondents’tendency to report what they think the “correct”response should be. Research on the correlation of resident opinionabout service quality and “objective”ratings of service quality vary, with some showing stronger relationships than others. NRC’s own research has demonstrated that residents who report the lowest ratings of street repair live in communities with objectively worse street conditions than those who report high ratings of street repair (based on road quality, delay in street repair, number of road repair employees). Similarly, the lowest rated fire services appear to be “objectively”worse than the highest rated fire services (expenditures per capita, response time, “professional”status of firefighters, breadth of services and training provided). Resident opinion commonly reflects objective performance data but is an importantmeasure on its own. NRC principals have written, “If you collect trash three times a day but residents think that your trash haul is lousy, you still have a problem.” Survey Sampling “Sampling”refers to the method by which households were chosen to receive the survey. All households within the Cityof Shakopeewere eligible to participate in the survey.A list of all households within the zip codes serving Shakopeewas purchased based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service.Since some of the zip codes that serve theCityof Shakopeehouseholds may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exact geographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundary file (updated on a quarterly basis) andaddresses located outside of theCityof Shakopee boundaries were removed from consideration. Each address identified as being withinCityboundaries was further identified as being within one of six subareas.It is worth noting that while Shakopee has six subareas, no surveys were sent tosubarea sixbecause no households exist in that area. To choose the 1,500survey recipients, a systematic sampling method was applied to the list of households previously screened for geographic location. Systematic sampling is a procedure whereby a complete list of all possible households is culled, selecting every Nthone, giving each eligible household a known probability of selection, until the appropriate number of households is selected. Multi-family housing units were over sampled as residents of this type of housing typically respond at lower rates to surveys than do those in single-family housing units. Figure 1 displays a map of the households selected to receive the survey. In general, because of the random sampling techniques used, the displayed sampling density will closely mirror the overall housing unit density (which may be different from the population density). While the theory of probability assumes no bias in selection, there may be some minor variations in practice (meaning, an area with only 15% of the housing units might be sampled at an actual rate that is slightly above or below that). An individual within each household was selected using the birthday method. The birthday method selects a person within the household by asking the “person whose birthday has most recently passed” to complete the questionnaire. The underlying assumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way people respond to surveys. This instruction was contained in the cover letter accompanying the questionnaire. In addition to the scientific, random sample, a link to an online “opt-in” survey was publicized and posted to the Cityof Shakopeewebsite. This opt-in survey was identical to the scientific survey and open to all Cityresidents. 33 The National Citizen Survey™ Figure 1: Location of Survey Recipients Survey Administrationand Response Selected households received three mailings, one week apart, beginning onNovember 14, 2016. The first mailing was a prenotification postcard announcing the upcoming survey. The next mailing contained a letter from the Mayor inviting the household to participate, a questionnaire and a postage-paid return envelope. The final mailing contained a reminder letter, another survey and a postage-paid return envelope. The second cover letter asked those who had not completed the survey to do so and those who had already done so to refrain from turning in another survey. Completed surveys were collected over the following sevenweeks.The online “opt-in” survey became available to all residents on December 19, 2016 and was open for two weeks. th About 2% of the 1,500surveys mailed were returned because the housing unit was vacant or the postal service was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 1,472householdsthat received the survey, 410 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of28%. Of the410completed surveys, 31were completedonline. Additionally, responses were tracked byarea; response rates by subarearanged from 25% to 41%.An additional 423 residents completed the online “opt-in” survey (please see the Supplemental WebReport under separate cover). 34 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 81: Survey Response Rates by Area Number mailedUndeliverableEligibleReturnedResponse rate Subarea14181440410225% Subarea2595758815627% Subarea325542518132% Subarea419531925629% Subarea5370371541% Overall1,500281,47241028% Confidence Intervals It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a “level of confidence”and accompanying “confidence interval”(or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is 95%. The 95% confidence interval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of thesurvey results because some residents’opinions are relied on to estimate all residents’opinions. 1 The margin of error for theCityof Shakopeesurvey is no greater than plus or minus fivepercentage points around any given percent reported for the entire sample (410completed surveys). For subgroups of responses, the margin of error increases because the sample size for the subgroup is smaller. For subgroups of approximately 100 respondents, the margin of error is plus or minus 10 percentage points. Survey Processing (Data Entry) Upon receipt, completed surveys were assigned a unique identification number. Additionally, each survey was reviewed and “cleaned”as necessary. For example, a question may have asked a respondent to pick two items out of a list of five, but the respondent checked three; in this case, NRC woulduse protocols to randomly choose two of the three selected items for inclusion in the dataset. All surveys then were entered twice into an electronic dataset; any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. NRC used Qualtrics, a web-based survey and analytics platform, to collect the online survey data. Use of an online system means all collected data are entered into the dataset when the respondents submit the surveys. Skip patterns are programmed into system so respondents are automatically “skipped” to the appropriate question based on the individual responses being given. Online programming also allows for more rigid control of the data format, making extensive data cleaning unnecessary. A series of quality control checks were also performed in order to ensure the integrity of the web data. Steps may include and not be limited to reviewing the data for clusters of repeat IP addresses and time stamps (indicating duplicate responses) and removing empty submissions (questionnaires submitted with no questions answered). Survey Data Weighting The demographic characteristics of the survey sample were compared to those found in the 2010 Census and American Community Survey estimates for adults in theCityof Shakopee. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the survey sample reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were housing tenure (rent or own), housing type (attached or detached), race, sex and age. The results of the weighting scheme are presented in the following table. 1 A 95% confidence interval indicates that for every 100 random samples of this many residents, 95 of the confidence intervals created will include the “true” population response. This theory is applied in practice to mean that the “true” perspective of thetarget population lies within the confidence interval created for a single survey. For example, if 75% of residents rate a service as “excellent” or“good,” then the 4% margin of error (for the 95% confidence interval) indicates that the range of likely responses for the entire community is between 71% and 79%. This source of uncertainty is called sampling error. In addition to sampling error, other sources of error may affect any survey, including the non-response of residents with opinions different fromsurvey responders. Though standardized on The NCS, on other surveys, differences in question wording, order, translation and data entry, as examples, can lead to somewhat varying results. 35 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 82: Shakopee,MN2017Weighting Table CharacteristicPopulation NormUnweighted DataWeighted Data Housing Rent home23%10%21% Own home77%90%79% Detached unit58%71%60% Attached unit42%29%40% Race and Ethnicity White80%90%81% Not white20%10%19% Not Hispanic93%98%96% Hispanic7%2%4% Sex and Age Female51%50%51% Male49%50%49% 18-34 years of age36%15%35% 35-54 years of age44%43%44% 55+ years of age20%42%21% Females 18-3419%10%18% Females 35-5421%21%22% Females 55+11%19%11% Males 18-3418%6%18% Males 35-5422%21%23% Males 55+9%23%9% Area Subarea125%25%22% Subarea239%38%43% Subarea319%20%21% Subarea415%14%12% Subarea52%4%2% Survey Data Analysis and Reporting The survey dataset was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the “percent positive.” The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positiveresponse options (i.e., “excellent” and “good,” “very safe” and “somewhat safe,” “essential” and “very important,” etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating “yes” or participating in an activity at least once a month. On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.”The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in Appendix A. However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. 36 The National Citizen Survey™ Appendix D: Survey Materials 37 Dear Shakopee Resident, Dear Shakopee Resident, It won’t take much of your time to make a big difference! It won’t take much of your time to make a big difference! Your household has been randomly selected to participate in a survey Your household has been randomly selected to participate in a survey about your community. Your survey will arrive in a few days. about your community. Your survey will arrive in a few days. Thank you for helping create a better city! Thank you for helping create a better city! Sincerely,Sincerely, Bill Mars Bill Mars Mayor Mayor Dear Shakopee Resident, Dear Shakopee Resident, It won’t take much of your time to make a big difference! It won’t take much of your time to make a big difference! Your household has been randomly selected to participate in a survey Your household has been randomly selected to participate in a survey about your community. Your survey will arrive in a few days. about your community. Your survey will arrive in a few days. Thank you for helping create a better city! Thank you for helping create a better city! Sincerely,Sincerely, Bill Mars Bill Mars Mayor Mayor PresortedPresorted First Class Mail First Class Mail US Postage US Postage PAIDPAID Boulder, CO Boulder, CO Permit NO. 94 Permit NO. 94 City of Shakopee City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 Shakopee, MN 55379 PresortedPresorted First Class Mail First Class Mail US Postage US Postage PAIDPAID Boulder, CO Boulder, CO Permit NO. 94 Permit NO. 94 City of Shakopee City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 Shakopee, MN 55379 November2016 Dear Cityof ShakopeeResident: Please help us shape the future of Shakopee! You have been selected at random to participate in the 2016ShakopeeCitizen Survey. Please take a few minutes to fill out the enclosed survey. Your participation in this survey is very important –especially since your household is one of only a small number of households being surveyed. Your feedback will help Shakopeemake decisions that affect our city. A few things to remember: Your responses are completely anonymous. In order to hear from a diverse group of residents, the adult 18 years or older in your household who most recently had a birthday should complete this survey. You may return the survey by mail in the enclosed postage-paid envelope, or you can complete the survey online at: www.n-r-c.com/survey/shakopee.htm If you have any questions about the survey please call 952-233-9310. Thank you for your time and participation! Sincerely, Bill Mars Mayor COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 155379--233--233- November2016 Dear Cityof ShakopeeResident: Here’s a second chance if you haven’t already responded to the 2016ShakopeeCitizen Survey! (If you completed it and sent it back, we thank you for your time and ask you to recycle this survey. Please do not respond twice.) Please help us shape the future of Shakopee! You have been selected at random to participate in the 2016ShakopeeCitizen Survey. Please take a few minutes to fill out the enclosed survey. Your participation in this survey is very important –especially since your household is one of only a small number of households being surveyed. Your feedback will help Shakopeemake decisions that affect our city. A few things to remember: Your responses are completely anonymous. In order to hear from a diverse group of residents, the adult 18 years or older in your household who most recently had a birthday should complete this survey. You may return the survey by mail in the enclosed postage-paid envelope, or you can complete the survey online at: www.n-r-c.com/survey/shakopee.htm If you have any questions about the survey please call 952-233-9310. Thank you for your time and participation! Sincerely, Bill Mars Mayor COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 1---2-- The City of Shakopee 2016 Citizen Survey Please complete this questionnaire if you are the adult (age 18 or older) in the household who most recently had a birthday. The adult’s year of birth does not matter. Please select the response (by circling the number or checking the box) that most closely represents your opinion for each question. Your responses are anonymous and will be reported in group form only. 1. Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee: Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Shakopee as a place to live...............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Your neighborhood as a place to live...............................................................1 2 3 4 5 Shakopee as a place to raise children ...............................................................1 2 3 4 5 Shakopee as a place to work ............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Shakopee as a place to visit ..............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Shakopee as a place to retire ............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 The overall quality of life in Shakopee .............................................................1 2 3 4 5 2. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole: Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit...........................1 2 3 4 5 Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee ........................................1 2 3 4 5 Overall “built environment” of Shakopee (including overall design, buildings, parks and transportation systems) .................................................1 2 3 4 5 Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee ................................................1 2 3 4 5 Overall opportunities for education and enrichment ........................................1 2 3 4 5 Overall economic health of Shakopee ..............................................................1 2 3 4 5 Sense of community ........................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Overall image or reputation of Shakopee .........................................................1 2 3 4 5 3. Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following: Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t likely likely unlikely unlikely know Recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks .......................... 1 2 3 4 5 Remain in Shakopeefor the next five years .......................................... 1 2 3 4 5 4. Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: Very Somewhat Neither safe Somewhat Very Don’t safe safe nor unsafe unsafe unsafe know In your neighborhood during the day .................................. 1 2 3 4 5 6 In Shakopee’s downtown/commercial areas during the day ......................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 5. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole: Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Traffic flow on major streets ............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Ease of public parking .....................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by car in Shakopee.....................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by public transportation in Shakopee .........................................1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by bicycle in Shakopee ...............................................................1 2 3 4 5 Ease of walking in Shakopee............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Availability of paths and walking trails .............................................................1 2 3 4 5 Air quality .......................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Cleanliness of Shakopee...................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Overall appearance of Shakopee .....................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Public places where people want to spend time ................................................1 2 3 4 5 Variety of housing options ...............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality housing .........................................................1 2 3 4 5 Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.)...........1 2 3 4 5 Recreational opportunities ...............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality food ..............................................................1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality health care ....................................................1 2 3 4 5 Availability of preventive health services..........................................................1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality mental health care ........................................1 2 3 4 5 Page 1 of 5 6. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopeeas a whole: ExcellentGoodFairPoorDon’t know Availability of affordable quality child care/preschool .....................................1 2 3 4 5 K-12 education................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Adult educational opportunities .......................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities ......................................1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to participate in religious or spiritual events and activities.........1 2 3 4 5 Employment opportunities ..............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Shopping opportunities....................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Cost of living in Shakopee...............................................................................12345 Overall quality of business and service establishments in Shakopee ..................1 2 3 4 5 Vibrant downtown/commercial areas.............................................................12345 Overall quality of new development in Shakopee.............................................1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to participate in social events and activities................................12345 Opportunities to volunteer...............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to participate in community matters ..........................................1 2 3 4 5 Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds .....................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Neighborliness of residents in Shakopee...........................................................1 2 3 4 5 7. Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. NoYes Made efforts to conserve water ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 Made efforts to make your home more energy efficient ....................................................................................... 1 2 Observed a code violation or other hazard in Shakopee(weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) ................................ 1 2 Household member was a victim of a crime in Shakopee .................................................................................... 1 2 Reported a crime to the police in Shakopee........................................................................................................ 1 2 Stocked supplies in preparation for an emergency .............................................................................................. 1 2 Campaigned or advocated for an issue, cause or candidate ................................................................................. 1 2 Contacted the City of Shakopee(in-person, phone, email or web) for help or information ..................................1 2 Contacted Shakopee elected officials (in-person, phone, email or web) to express your opinion........................... 1 2 8. In the last 12 months, about how many times, if at all, have you or other household members done each of the following in Shakopee? 2 times a 2-4 times Once a month Not week or more a month or less at all Used Shakopee recreation centers or their services ......................................................... 1 2 3 4 National Research Center, Inc. Visited a neighborhood park or Citypark .......................................................................1 2 3 4 Used Shakopee public libraries or their services .............................................................. 1 2 3 4 Participated in religious or spiritual activities in Shakopee .............................................. 1 2 3 4 Attended a City-sponsored event .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 Used bus or other public transportation instead of driving .............................................. 1 2 3 4 Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone .................................... 1 2 3 4 Walked or biked instead of driving .................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Shakopee............................................1234 Participated in a club ...................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 Talked to or visited with your immediate neighbors........................................................1234 Done a favor for a neighbor ............................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 - Visited downtown Shakopee...........................................................................................1234 9. Thinking about local public meetings (of local elected officials like City Council or County Commissioners, advisory boards, town halls, HOA, neighborhood watch, etc.), in the last 12 months, about how many times, if at all, have you or other household members attended or watched a local public meeting? 2 times a 2-4 times Once a month Not week or more a month or less at all Attendedalocal public meeting .....................................................................................1234 Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting ................................................. 1 2 3 4 The National Page 2 of 5 The City of Shakopee 2016 Citizen Survey 10. Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee: Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Police services ..................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Fire services .....................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Crime prevention ............................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Fire prevention and education .........................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Traffic enforcement .........................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Street repair ....................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Street cleaning .................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Street lighting..................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Snow removal..................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Sidewalk maintenance .....................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Traffic signal timing ........................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Garbage collection...........................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Recycling.........................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Storm drainage ................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Sewer services..................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 City parks ........................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Recreation programs or classes ........................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Recreation centers or facilities .........................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Land use, planning and zoning ........................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.)......................................1 2 3 4 5 Animal control ................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Economic development ...................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Public information services ..............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Cable television ...............................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations) ............................................1 2 3 4 5 Shakopee open space .......................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 City-sponsored special events ...........................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Overall customer service by Shakopee employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.) ............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 11. Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know The City of Shakopee ......................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 The Federal Government ................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Scott County Government ...............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 12. Please rate the following categories of Shakopee government performance: Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know The value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee ........................................1 2 3 4 5 The overall direction that Shakopee is taking ...................................................1 2 3 4 5 The job Shakopee government does at welcoming citizen involvement ............1 2 3 4 5 Overall confidence in Shakopee government ...................................................1 2 3 4 5 Generally acting in the best interest of the community .....................................1 2 3 4 5 Being honest ....................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Treating all residents fairly ..............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Page 3 of 5 13. Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Shakopee community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years: Very Somewhat Not at all Essentialimportantimportantimportant Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit.......................................... 1 2 3 4 Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee ....................................................... 1 2 3 4 Overall “built environment” of Shakopee (including overall design, buildings, parks and transportation systems) ............................................................... 1 2 3 4 Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee ............................................................... 1 2 3 4 Overall opportunities for education and enrichment....................................................... 1 2 3 4 Overall economic health of Shakopee ............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 Sense of community .......................................................................................................1 2 3 4 14.To what degreewould you support or oppose a more active/strong approach by the City in enforcement of residential property codes? Strongly supportSomewhat supportSomewhat opposeStrongly opposeDon’t know 15. Which of these items, if any, would attract you to Downtown Shakopee more often (please select the one item that would attract you most)? Retail Public amenities Public events Restaurants 16. Please indicate how much of a source, if at all, you consider each of the following to be for obtaining information about the City government and its activities, events and services: MajorMinorNot a source source source City website (www.ShakopeeMN.gov) ............................................................................................... 1 2 3 Shakopee Valley News.......................................................................................................................123 Star Tribune ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 Local government cable channel (Comcast 16 ......................................................1 2 3 City Newsletter (Hometown Messenger/Parks and Recreation Activity Brochure)............................. 1 2 3 Talking with City officials ..................................................................................................................1 2 3 City communications via social media ............................................................................................... 1 2 3 Word-of-mouth .................................................................................................................................1 2 3 National Research Center, Inc. Email (E-News, eNotifications) ..........................................................................................................1 2 3 17. Please indicate how important, if at all, each of the following projects and issues will be for the City to address over the next five years? Very Somewhat Not at all Don’t Essentialimportantimportantimportantknow Redeveloping downtown..........................................................................12345 Improving the riverfront at Huber Park .................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Enhancement and preservation of natural resources and open space within the City ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Improving access to public transportation ................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 - Construction of a third Fire Station to improve fire and emergency response times ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 18. What do you think is the most serious issue facing Shakopee today? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 19.If you ever feel unsafe in Shakopee, please provide a specific reason for this: The National ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 5 The City of Shakopee 2016 Citizen Survey Our last questions are about you and your household. Again, all of your responses to this survey are completely anonymous and will be reported in group form only. D1. How often, if at all, do you do each of the following, considering all of the times you could? Never Rarely Sometimes Usually Always Recycle at home ...........................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 Purchase goods or services from a business located in Shakopee ...................1 2 3 4 5 Eat at least 5 portions of fruits and vegetables a day .....................................1 2 3 4 5 Participate in moderate or vigorous physical activity....................................1 2 3 4 5 Read or watch local news (via television, paper, computer, etc.) ...................1 2 3 4 5 Vote in local elections ..................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 D2. Would you say that in general your health is: Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor D3. What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Very positive Somewhat positive Neutral Somewhat negative Very negative D4.What is your employment status? D12. How much do you anticipate your household’s Working full time for pay total income before taxes will be for the current Working part time for pay year? (Please include in your total income money Unemployed, looking for paid work from all sources for all persons living in your household.) Unemployed, not looking for paid work Fully retired Less than $25, D5. Do you work inside the boundaries of Shakopee? Yes, outside the home Yes, from home $15 No Please respond to both questions D13 and D14: D6. How many years have you lived in Shakopee? Less than 2 years 11- D13. Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino? 2-5 years No, not Spanish, Hispanic or Latino 6- Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic D7.Which best describes the building you live in? or Latino One family house detached from any other houses D14. What is your race? (Mark one or more races Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, to indicate what race you consider yourself apartment or condominium) to be.) Mobile home American Indian or Alaskan Native Other Asian, Asian Indian or Pacific Islander D8. Is this house, apartment or mobile home... Black or African American Rented White Owned Other D9. About how much is your monthly housing cost D15.In which category is your age? for the place you live (including rent, mortgage 18-24 years 55-64 years payment, property tax, property insurance and 25-34 years 65-74 years homeowners’ association (HOA) fees)? 35-44 years 75 years or older 45-54 years D16. What is your sex? Female Male $1 D17. Do you consider a cell phone or land line your primary telephone number? Cell Land line Both D10. Do any children 17 or under live in your household? No Yes Thank you for completing this survey. Please D11. Are you or any other members of your household return the completed survey in the postage-paid aged 65 or older? envelope to: National Research Center, Inc., No Yes PO Box 549, Belle Mead, NJ 08502 Page 5 of 5 City of Shakopee Presorted 129 Holmes Street South First Class Mail US Postage Shakopee, MN 55379 PAID Boulder, CO Permit NO.94 3300 University Avenue SE Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 www.tierneybrothers.com 612.331.5500800.933.7337Fax -612.331.3424 Thursday, October 06, 2016 City of Shakopee Proposal for Audio-Visual Service RE:City Hall 11466R4 Opportunity Number: (This client requested revision includes new items, in italics and bolded.Strikeouts denote items removed per this and any previous revision.) Scope of Integration Services Summary of Work to be completed by Tierney Brothers, Inc. at 129 Holmes Street South, Shakopee MN, 55379. (Please initial if address is correct or provide correct address. ____________ ) 11466 City of ShakopeeA–72214 -Council Chambers(Revision 4) The AV system in the new council chambers will use most of the equipment fromthe existing Council chambers. It will be de-installed, moved and re-installed in the new facility. The projector and screen will not be reused in the new Council Chambers, it will be used in the Training Room, 220. The Council Chambers will have two wall (or ceiling) mounted 90” LED monitors as the main displays. Each seat on the dais will have its own monitor which will be moved from the existing room. There will also be one 58” LED monitors in the Lobby. This monitor will be wall mountedto the balcony face.This monitor will be used for overflow viewing and digital signage. There will also be a 50” LED monitor installed on a side wall near the rear of the room to function as a confidence monitor for the dais. This monitor will display the live TV feed. Therewill be two input locations at the dais, one at each staff side. In the presenter’s lectern there will be inputs for a dedicated computer and a guest laptop. Aring of adaptors includingdisplay port to HDMI is included to accommodate various computeroutput types. Twonew HD ceiling document cameraswill also provide an input to the system. Onecamera will view items on the presenter’s lectern. The camera has a laser spot to indicate the center of the viewing area. The Second camera will be used during non-council meetings and its location is to be determined. The general contractor will cut the ceiling as needed for both cameras. All inputs will feed the Crestron Digital Media Matrix switcher. Additional input cards will be added to accommodate more inputs than in the current room. Additional outputs will be accomplished using the existing output cards with some additional transmitters and receivers for signal extension.The switcher will be at its max capacity. The Broadcast system will be moved from the existing room and re-installed in the new facility. The six existing cameras installed within the room as shown on the plans. The existing equipment racks will moved. Recording, streaming, and Cable feeds will remain as is. A new monitor will be installed in the Council chamber as a confidence monitor as discussed above. A65”LED monitor on a mobile cart will be provided for use during non-council meetings in the room.This will have Avideo feed plate,with a built in receiver, will bemounted to the front of .The receiver will be mounted on the monitor the dais.The imageof this outputwill be the The monitor has additional input so that it same as the images on the wall mounted monitors. can be used in other spaces and inputs connected directly to the monitor. Monitor control will be manual at the monitor. The audio system will be moved from the existing facility to the new facility. There will be wired mics on the dais and a pair of wireless mics for use in the room. A new floor box will be installed with sixteen wired mic inputs for non-council meetings. The speaker system in the new room will be different than in the existing room. There will be five small, 1 gang box sized, speakers mounted on the dais providing sound to the council and staff members. These will be mounted in surface mounting boxes. There will be two black pendent speakers installed above the audience area for sound to the audience. These speakers will hang between the ceilingslats and will be close to the ceiling. In the Lobby there will be two wall mounted speakers mountedabove the glass wall ofthe Council chambers. These will provide overflow audio to the lobby. The control room will use the existing speaker for audio in the control room. Control will be handled through two touch panels. One10” wired touch panel will be the control point in the control room and a second,8.7” wireless touch panel will be used in the council chambers. The charging base for the wireless panel will be a one of the staff positions. The Crestron will control monitors on/off, input selection and routing, and other functions as it currently does in the existing room. The owner will also supply the Cable TV feed(s) and receiver(s). A new“On Air” lite will be installed in the council chambers. The existing assistive listening system will be moved from the current Council Chambers to the new room. The existing equipment racks will be reused to house system equipment. The existing digital signage system server will also be moved to the new location. Band C–72312 and 72316–Executive Conference room 111 (revision 4) and Conference room 148 These two rooms will have the same AV system installed for presentations. Web conferencing capabilities can be added but are not included in this proposal. There will be a 65” LED monitor on the front wall of the rooms. An in-wall box will be provided for installation by the owner at the monitor locations. This box will house system equipment. Inputs for a dedicated computer, laptop computer at the table, and Cable TV will be available. It is assumed the dedicated computer is a small form factor computer mounted behind the monitor. At the table a Cable Cubby will be installed with two AC outlets, two USB power outlets, and connections for HDMI and USB (for a future table microphone). Tierney Brothers will cut the table for the Cable Cubby. A transmitter will be mounted under the table for video signal extension to the monitor. Cables will run through an owner provided floor box. A disconnect in the floor box is planned. An adapter ring will be provided with adapters for Display Port, Apple 30 pin, and Apple Lighting connectors to HDMI. Audio will be heard from the monitor’s speakers. An Extron Media Link Controller, button panelcontroller, will be installed on the wall for control of the system. It will control monitor on/off, input selection, and volume. The Cable TV receiver’s remote will be used for control of the receiver. The owner is responsible for the installation of the in-wall box at the monitor location with two duplex electrical outlets in the box. The owner will provide the cable pathway from the table to the monitor. The owner will also supply the Cable TV feed and receiver. C –72316 –Conference room 148(Revision 4) There will be a 65” LED monitor on the front wall of the room. Inputs for a dedicated computer at the table and Cable TV will be available. (no guest input is included) At the table a Cable Cubby will be installed with two AC outlets, two USB power outlets, and connections for HDMI and USB (for a future table microphone). Tierney Brothers will cut the table for the Cable Cubby. A transmitter will be mounted under the table for video signal extension to the monitor. Cables will run through anowner provided floor box. A disconnect in the floor box is planned. Audio will be heard from the monitor’s speakers. The monitor’s remote will be used for control of the monitor. The owner is responsible for a quad electrical outlet at the monitor location. The owner will provide the cable pathway from the table to the monitor. The owner will also supply the Cable TV feed and receiver.No in wall box or adapter ring is included in this revision. D–83368–Community Room 108(Revision 4) The Community Room will have an AV system for presentationsusing anew projection system. A new Epson projector will be ceiling mounted. This projector is WUXGA in resolution and produces 5200 ANSI Lumens. The projected image will be displayed on a wall mounted . ceiling recessed electric screen manual screen that measures 60”x96” In a new lectern,there will be inputs for a dedicated computer, laptop computer, and Cable TV receiver. All inputs will feed a switcher. The output of the switcher will feed the projector.An adapter ring will be provided with adapters for Display Port, Apple 30 pin, and Apple Lighting connectors to HDMI. There will be wireless lapel and handheld microphones for use in the room. All audio will feed a mixer/amplifier drivingfour ceiling speakers, and the Assistive Listening System is included with four receivers. The wireless mics will not be used for conferencing, only voice amplification in the room. Audio from the projector will feed a pair of self-amplified wall mounted speakers on either side of the projection screen. All equipment will be housed in the lectern. The lectern will have an umbilical to the wall with disconnects. An Extron Media Link Controller, button panelcontroller, will be installed on the lectern for control of the system. It will control projector on/off, input selection, and volume. The Cable TV receiver’s remote will be used for control of the receiver. The owner is responsible for an electricaloutlet at the projector,monitors, and lectern locations, and power to the left end of the screen. A cable pathway from the wall to the projector will be provided by the owner. The owner will also supply the Cable TV feed and receiver. E–72338 Break Room 206 A 50” TV will be wall mounted in the break room for viewing Cable TV. The Cable TV remote and the TV remote will be used for control. Audio will be heard from the TV’s speakers. The owner is responsible for an electrical outlet at the TV’s location. The owner will also supply the Cable TV feed and receiver. F–72346 –Training Room(revision 4) The Training Room will have an AV system for presentations. It will use a projection system removed for the existing Council Chambers. The owner furnished Panasonic projector will be ceiling mounted. The projected image will be displayed on an owner providedDraper ceiling recessed electric screen. The projector and screen will be removed from the current Council Chambers and will be reinstalled in this room. In a lectern,there will be inputs for a dedicated computer, laptop computer, and Cable TV An receiver. All inputs will feed a switcher. The output of the switcher will feed the projector. adapter ring will be provided with adapters for Display Port, Apple 30 pin, and Apple Lighting connectors to HDMI. The audio output of the projector will feed a pair of wall mounted self-amplified . .switcher will feed and amplifier that will drive six ceiling speakers speakers All equipment willbe housed in the lectern. The lectern will have an umbilical to the wall with disconnects. An Extron Media Link Controller, button panelcontroller, will be installed in the front wall for control of the system. It will control projector on/off, inputselection, and volume. The Cable TV receiver’s remote will be used for control of the receiver. The owner is responsible for aelectrical outlet at the projector and lectern locations, and quad power to the left end of the screen. A cable pathway from the wall to the projector will be provided by the owner. The owner will also supply the Cable TV feed and receiver. G –83371–Conference Room 203(Revision 4) There will be a 65” LED monitor on the front wall of the room. Inputs for a dedicated computer at the table and Cable TV will be available. At the table a Cable Cubby will be installed with two AC outlets, two USB power outlets, and connections for HDMI and USB (for a future table microphone). Tierney Brothers will cut the table for the Cable Cubby. A transmitter will be mounted under the table for video signal extension to the monitor. Cables will run through an owner provided floor box. A disconnect in the floor box is planned. Audio will be heard from the monitor’s speakers. The monitor’s remote will be used for control of the monitor. The owner is responsible for a quad electrical outlet at the monitor location. The owner will provide the cable pathway from the table to the monitor. The owner will also supply the Cable TV feed andreceiver. No in wall box or adapter ring is included in this revision. This room will have the same AV system and rooms 111 and 148 installed for presentations. Web conferencing capabilities can be added but are not included in this proposal. There will be a 70” LED monitor on the front wall of the rooms. An in-wall box will be provided for installation by the owner at the monitor locations. This box will house system equipment. Inputs for a dedicated computer, laptop computer at the table, and Cable TV will be available. It is assumed the dedicated computer is a small form factor computer mounted behind the monitor. At the table a Cable Cubby will be installed with two AC outlets, two USB power outlets, and connections for HDMI and USB (for a future table microphone). Tierney Brothers will cut the table for the Cable Cubby. A transmitter will be mounted under the table for video signal extension to the monitor. Cables will run through an owner provided floor box. A disconnect in the floor box is planned. An adapter ring will be provided with adapters for Display Port, Apple 30 pin, and Apple Lighting connectors to HDMI. Audio will be heard from the monitor’s speakers. An Extron Media Link Controller, button panel controller, will beinstalled on the wall for control of the system. It will control monitor on/off, input selection, and volume. The Cable TV receiver’s remote will be used for control of the receiver. The owner is responsible for the installation of the in-wall box atthe monitor location with two duplex electrical outlets in the box. The owner will provide the cable pathway from the table to the monitor. The owner will also supply the Cable TV feed and receiver. H –79520 Fire Place TV R2 A 50” TV will be wall mounted Above the Fire Place in the Lobby for viewing Cable TV. The Cable TV remote and the TV remote will be used for control. Audio will be heard from the TV’s speakers.A thin mount will be used to meet ADA depth guidelines. Location of the Cable Box is to be determined as it will not fit behind the TV. An in-wall box can be added behind the TV to house the Cable receiver and signage player. This can bediscussed and added as a Change Order if needed. The owner is responsible for an electrical outlet at the TV’s location. The owner will also supply the Cable TV feed and receiver.No computer feed to this monitor is being provided. The cable signal will be the only source to this display. I–72390 Existing Training room in Police Station (new in REV 2) The existing Training Room in the Police Station will be used for meetings, plan reviews and web based conferencing. A new Epson projector will be ceiling mounted. This projector is WUXGA in resolution and produces 5200 ANSI Lumens. The projected image will be displayed on the existing ceiling recessed electric screen. Two 58” monitors will be mounted on either of side of the projection screen using swing arm mounts. Anew projector is included as the existing projector is only XGA in resolution. In thenew lectern, there will be inputs for a dedicated computer, laptop computer, and Cable TV receiver. All inputs willfeed a Crestron Digital Media Presentation Switcher (DMPS) with internal control processor. The outputs will feed the projector and monitors. This is a matrixing switching allowing multiple images to be displayed at the same time. An adapter ring will be provided with adapters for Display Port, Apple 30 pin, and Apple Lighting connectors to HDMI. The existing Eye10 ceiling camera in the current Council Chambers will be relocated to this room at a location in the room to be determined. This will also feed the switcher. There will be wireless lapel and handheld microphones for use in the room. All audio will feed the DMPS whose outputs feed the existing amplifier, driving the existing four ceiling speakers. An Assistive Listening System is included with four receivers. All equipment will be housed in the lectern. The lectern will have an umbilical to the wall. The Umbilical will NOT disconnect at the wall. A fixed USB camera will be mounted above one monitor and will feed the dedicated computer. A Chat 170 USB mic/speaker for voice pickup will be available at the lectern to the dedicated computer. This microphone will not cover the entire room. This is intended for smaller room use. If the entire room coverage is needed, it can be added as a revision or a change order. TheUSB camera and the microphonewill be used for Web based conferencing. All conferencing control will be through the dedicated computerand the web conferencing application. The wireless microphones will not be used during a conference session. The Crestron control system will have a wireless 8.7” touch panel as the control point. This will reside on the lectern. The Crestron will control the projector on/off, screen up/down, individual monitor on/off, or all one, input selection and routing, document camera zoom and focus control, cable TV channel selection, and room volume. The owner is responsible for an electrical outlet at the projector, monitors, and lectern locations I f not already in place. The owner will also supply the Cable TV feed and receiver. The existing Sharp monitor at the back of the room will remain as is. It will not tie into the new system. It will be a standalone device within the space. J–80156 Cart for Sharp monitor(new in REV 2) The existing Sharp Interactive wall mounted monitor will be taken off the wall and installed on a cart making it mobile. An HDMI cable is included for a laptop connection. The Tierney Brothers building warrantyplan will be provided in a separate proposal. A 90 day installation warranty is included in this proposal for each room. We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at your convenience at 612-331-5500. Our fax numberis 612-331- 3424. Proposal Prepared By: Sales Representative -Heidi Harvey Sales Engineer -Richard Long Please initial to acknowledge and authorize the Scope of Integration Services presented here. ___________ Quote Serving the States of: IL | IN | IA | KY | MI | MN | OH | WI Remit To: 3300 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 (612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Quote #Date Page 1 of 3 10/4/2016 83360 Ship To Bill To City of Shakopee Accounts Payable 129 Holmes Street South City of Shakopee Shakopee MN 55379 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee MN 55379 ___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly ExpiresSales RepContractMemo 1/2/2017209 Heidi HarveyMNS-CPV 21594A - New Council Chambers (SC) QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price A - New Council Chambers (SC) Revised Owner Furnished Product - the majority of the equipment for the new Council chambers to be removed from existing Council Chambers and re-installed in new room, Including: Crestron DM Matrix Switcher, Transmitters and receivers Dais monitors and signal distribution, microphones, audio mixers, amps and associated equipment Broadcast system including cameras, switcher etc. Digital Signage System to be moved to new IT location in PD. 2E905E905 - 90 LED LCD Public Display Monitor, 1920 x 1080 (FHD), 3507,076.0014,152.00 cd/m2 panel, Full bidirectional LAN/RS-232 Control, HDMI x2, DisplayPort, DVI-D, VGA, OPS Option Slot, Integrated 10W x 2 speakers, 3 year standard warranty, Stand not included. 1E585E585 - 58 LED LCD Public Display Monitor w/built in ATSC tuner,1,357.201,357.20 1920x1080 (FHD) native resolution, RS-232 control, Full AV function, USB Player, Built in speakers, 3 Year Warranty 1E505E505- 50 LED LCD Public Display Monitor w/built in ATSC tuner,701.80701.80 1920x1080 (FHD) native resolution, RS-232 control, Full AV function, USB Player, Built in speakers, 3 Year Warranty 1Chief MountingCustom Package - Mounting Solution for four displays:1,642.031,642.03 System (CustomThree swing arm mounts and One tilt mount Design) 3DM-TX-4K-100-C-1Wall Plate 4K DigitalMedia 8G+ Transmitter, Black Textured402.501,207.50 G-B-T(Decorator faceplate not included) 2DM-RMC-SCALER-Crestron Digital Media 8G copper Receiver & Controller805.001,610.00 C 1DM-RMC-4K-100-CWall Plate 4K DigitalMedia 8G+¢ Receiver & Room Controller 100,402.50402.50 -1G-B-TBlack Textured 4K DigitalMedia 8G+® Transmitter 302 1DM-TX-4K-302-C1,150.001,150.00 2DMC-4K-C-HDCP2HDBaseT¢ Certified 4K DigitalMedia 8G+¢ Input Card for DM¢747.501,495.00 Switchers 1DMC-4K-HD-HDCP4K HDMI¢ Input Card for DM¢ Switchers460.00460.00 2 2EYE-14Ceiling Visualizer3,872.967,745.92 Quote Quote #Date Page 2 of 3 10/4/2016 83360 QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price 2EYE-KitCeiling mount for suspended ceiling or sheetrock218.40436.80 1Interface SystemCustom Package - Floor box connections117.84117.84 Grommet plates ---------------------Audio Equipment--------------------- 1Custom ProductFSR floor box and connections for 16 microphones256.00256.00 Bundle 1Speaker SystemCustom Package - five speakers for dais, two pendent speakers for635.84635.84 audience area, two wall speakers for lobby 1Integration ItemLS-95-011,707.111,707.11 Listen Technology Assistive Listening System with: One (1) LT-84-01 ListenIR Transmitter/Radiator Combo Four (4) LT-5200-IR Advanced Intelligent DSP IR Receiver Four (4) LA-430 Intelligent Ear Phone/Neck Loop Lanyard Four (4) LA-401 Universal Ear Speaker One (1) LA-422 USB to Micro USB Cable One (1) LA-381-01 Intelligent 12-Unit Charging Tray One (1) LA-382 Intelligent Cable Management Unit One (1) LA-901 Listen Disinfecting Wipes (Cylinder 75 Count) One (1) LA-904 Listen Dispensing Log Book ---------------------Control System--------------------- 1Control Panel andCustom Package - Two Crestron touch panels -4,082.504,082.50 Accessoriesone wired 10 and one wireless 8.7 with table top kit and PoE Injector and RF Gateway ---------------------Other Equipment and Services--------------------- 1Cables,Custom Package of Cables, Connectors and Hardware Including:3,761.533,761.53 Connectors andUniversal HDMI Adapter Ring, Multiple lengths of HDMI, Plenum HardwareDigital Media Cabling, Bulk Cabling and Misc Hardware 1Services: Design -Services: Design - State Contract (Non Construction) Engineering5,096.005,096.00 State Contractand Project Management Services 79.63 Hours at $64.00/Hour 1Services -State Contract (Non Construction) Installation Services (Non-Union,7,380.007,380.00 Integration for MNNon Prevailing Wage; Normal Business Hours). Union and/or State ContractPrevailing Wage rate requirement will result in a change order to the client. 105.43 Hours at $70.00/Hour 1Programming andProgramming and Configuration Completed in the Field or In House8,690.008,690.00 Configuration75.57 Hours at $115.00/Hour Includes 90-day Programming Warranty; allowing for modifications to be made to the initial functionality within this time frame at no charge. Appointment times determined by Tierney Brothers. Changes requested after this time will be billable at standard hourly rates. If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues Chapter 297A Section 70 Exemptions for Governments and Nonprofit Groups. Please inform us if this project will be used for taxable purposes. If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable. Quote Quote #Date Page 3 of 3 10/4/2016 83360 QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price * This quotation is for product and services included on the Minnesota State Contract only. * Additional components not available on Contract may be needed for the system to function as designed. * Installation and non contract items provided on separate quotation. The services on this page must be purchased in conjunction with the Integration services on the Contract Release portion of this proposal. * Cabling is a combination of pre-terminated product and bulk cable requiring termination with a specific compression tool. * Manufacturer's warranties only apply to product purchased on State Contract portion of this proposal. * Tierney Brothers, Inc. will assist in any vendor communications to obtain replacements or return product as specified in the Contract. To accept this quotation, complete the proposal summary page at the end of this document. Please review the terms, conditions and client responsibilities of this proposal in full. _____________________________ Please inspect product upon delivery. All claims for defective merchandise or errors in shipping must be made within five days after receipt of goods. Clients using their own carriers will be responsible for filing their own freight claims if product is damaged in transit. Returns require an authorization number and must be made within 30 days. Custom orders and Consumables, such as projector lamps, may not be returned. Returns are subject to restocking fees with the exception of out of box failures and replacements under warranty. Restocking fees varying depending on the product line, expect a minimum charge of 25%. _____________________________ The information contained within this proposal is supplied to you on a confidential basis and is not for disclosure to any Total $64,087.57 organization without written consent of Tierney Brothers, Inc. This document is subject to the terms and conditions found here: www.tierneybrothers.com/SOTC Quote Serving the States of: IL | IN | IA | KY | MI | MN | OH | WI Remit To: 3300 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 (612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Quote #Date Page 1 of 2 8/18/2016 72413 Ship To Bill To City of Shakopee Accounts Payable 129 Holmes Street South City of Shakopee Shakopee MN 55379 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee MN 55379 ___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly ExpiresSales RepContractMemo 11/16/2016209 Heidi HarveyTransaction Not EligibleA - New Council Chambers (NC) QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price A - New Council Chambers (NC) Non-Contract Services - This sale is consistent with the Contract Release Construction Language Modification associated with the MN State Contract. 1Integration Item340-1295.0095.00 Sandies12 V DC LED ON AIR Studio Warning Light 1Integration Item65-35620.5420.54 Sandies 12VDC Power Supply for Model 340/343 1Integration ItemHi5400.00400.00 Aja HD-SDI to HDMI converter 1FL-500P-4-BFloor Box - 4 Deep158.00158.00 1Integration ItemFL-500P-BLP-C U-ACCESS485.00485.00 FSR floor box cover 5Integration ItemD-PSP1A175.00875.00 RDL Decora-Style Active Loudspeaker - Format-A white 5Integration ItemDC-1W51.00255.00 RDL 1 gang mounting box for speaker White 1Integration ItemTX-TPS1A123.00123.00 RDL Active Single-Pair Sender - Twisted Pair Format-A - Balanced line input 1Integration ItemRU-TPDA226.00226.00 RDL Active Distributor - Twisted Pair Format-A - RDL Format-A input to Four outputs 2PS24ASRadio Design Labs PS-24AS22.0044.00 24 VDC 500mA Switching Power Supply 1Services -State Contract (Non Construction) Installation Services (Non-Union,3,525.003,525.00 Integration for MNNon Prevailing Wage; Normal Business Hours). Non Contract State ContractInstallation Services - Construction Services by a Contract Vendor (Non-Union, Non Prevailing Wage; Normal Business Hours). Union and/or Prevailing Wage rate requirement will result in a change order to the client. 49 Hours at $75.00/Hour Quote Quote #Date Page 2 of 2 8/18/2016 72413 QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price To accept this quotation, complete the proposal summary page at the end of this document. Please review the terms, conditions and client responsibilities of this proposal in full. _____________________________ Please inspect product upon delivery. All claims for defective merchandise or errors in shipping must be made within five days after receipt of goods. Clients using their own carriers will be responsible for filing their own freight claims if product is damaged in transit. Returns require an authorization number and must be made within 30 days. Custom orders and Consumables, such as projector lamps, may not be returned. Returns are subject to restocking fees with the exception of Subtotal 6,206.54 out of box failures and replacements under warranty. Restocking fees varying depending on the product line, expect a Shipping Cost (UPS Ground) 121.45 minimum charge of 25%. _____________________________Total $6,327.99 The information contained within this proposal is supplied to you on a confidential basis and is not for disclosure to any organization without written consent of Tierney Brothers, Inc. This document is subject to the terms and conditions found here: www.tierneybrothers.com/SOTC Quote Serving the States of: IL | IN | IA | KY | MI | MN | OH | WI Remit To: 3300 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 (612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Quote #Date Page 1 of 2 4/19/2016 72312 Ship To Bill To City of Shakopee Accounts Payable 129 Holmes Street South City of Shakopee Shakopee MN 55379 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee MN 55379 ___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly ExpiresSales RepContractMemo 12/30/2016209 Heidi HarveyMNS-CPV 21594B - Executive Conf. 111 (SC) QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price B - Executive Conf. 111 revision 4 ---------------------Video Equipment--------------------- 1E65565 LED LCD Public Display Monitor w/built in ATSC/NTSC tuner,2,062.482,062.48 1920x1080 (FHD) native resolution, limited RS-232 control, HDMI x3, VGA, RCA Component/Composite, USB Media Player, Built in speakers, Tabletop stand not included, 3 Year Warranty 1Chief MountingCustom Package - Mounting Solution for 65 Display Including: Fixed230.08230.08 System (CustomWall Mount Design) 1Custom ProductExtron Cable Cubby 1200 with connections for HDMI, USB, Network,546.25546.25 BundleUSB Power, and AC 1Interface SystemCustom Package - HDMI extension System Including: transmitter,588.89588.89 receiver, misc hardware Owner Furnished Product - Small Form computer and CATV receiver both with HDMI outputs ---------------------Control System--------------------- 1MLC Plus 100MediaLink Plus Controller - MLC Plus 100White and Black684.25684.25 White and BlackFaceplates, 2-Gang Faceplates, 2-Gang 1DL85KDl85K Lcd/Cfl Proof Dinkylink Ir Rcvr, Kit - Xantech122.80122.80 ---------------------Other Equipment and Services--------------------- 1Cables,Custom Package of Cables, Connectors and Hardware Including:543.52543.52 Connectors andCustom Adapter Ring, HDMI, Shielded Twisted Pair Cabling, Bulk HardwareCabling and Misc Hardware 1Services: Design -Services: Design - State Contract (Non Construction) Engineering552.00552.00 State Contractand Project Management Services 9.63 Hours at $64.00/Hour 1Services -State Contract (Non Construction) Installation Services (Non-Union,612.00612.00 Integration for MNNon Prevailing Wage; Normal Business Hours). Union and/or State ContractPrevailing Wage rate requirement will result in a change order to the client. 8.74 Hours at $70.00/Hour Quote Quote #Date Page 2 of 2 4/19/2016 72312 QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price 1Programming andProgramming and Configuration Completed in the Field or In House115.00115.00 Configuration1 Hours at $115.00/Hour Includes 90-day Programming Warranty; allowing for modifications to be made to the initial functionality within this time frame at no charge. Appointment times determined by Tierney Brothers. Changes requested after this time will be billable at standard hourly rates. If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues Chapter 297A Section 70 Exemptions for Governments and Nonprofit Groups. Please inform us if this project will be used for taxable purposes. If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable. * This quotation is for product and services included on the Minnesota State Contract only. * Additional components not available on Contract may be needed for the system to function as designed. * Installation and non contract items provided on separate quotation. The services on this page must be purchased in conjunction with the Integration services on the Contract Release portion of this proposal. * Cabling is a combination of pre-terminated product and bulk cable requiring termination with a specific compression tool. * Manufacturer's warranties only apply to product purchased on State Contract portion of this proposal. * Tierney Brothers, Inc. will assist in any vendor communications to obtain replacements or return product as specified in the Contract. To accept this quotation, complete the proposal summary page at the end of this document. Please review the terms, conditions and client responsibilities of this proposal in full. _____________________________ Please inspect product upon delivery. All claims for defective merchandise or errors in shipping must be made within five days after receipt of goods. Clients using their own carriers will be responsible for filing their own freight claims if product is damaged in transit. Returns require an authorization number and must be made within 30 days. Custom orders and Consumables, such as projector lamps, may not be returned. Returns are subject to restocking fees with the exception of out of box failures and replacements under warranty. Restocking fees varying depending on the product line, expect a minimum charge of 25%. _____________________________ The information contained within this proposal is supplied to you on a confidential basis and is not for disclosure to any Total $6,057.27 organization without written consent of Tierney Brothers, Inc. This document is subject to the terms and conditions found here: www.tierneybrothers.com/SOTC Quote Serving the States of: IL | IN | IA | KY | MI | MN | OH | WI Remit To: 3300 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 (612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Quote #Date 8/26/2016 72418 Ship To Bill To City of Shakopee Accounts Payable 129 Holmes Street South City of Shakopee Shakopee MN 55379 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee MN 55379 ___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly ExpiresSales RepContractMemo 11/24/2016209 Heidi HarveyTransaction Not EligibleB - Executive Conf. 111 (NC) QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price B - Executive Conf. 111 Non-Contract Services - This sale is consistent with the Contract Release Construction Language Modification associated with the MN State Contract. 1Services -Non Contract Installation Services - Construction Services by a650.00650.00 Integration for MNContract Vendor (Non-Union, Non Prevailing Wage; Normal Business State ContractHours). Union and/or Prevailing Wage rate requirement will result in a change order to the client. 6 Hours at $75.00/Hour and $267 Subcontractor installation To accept this quotation, complete the proposal summary page at the end of this document. Please review the terms, conditions and client responsibilities of this proposal in full. _____________________________ Please inspect product upon delivery. All claims for defective merchandise or errors in shipping must be made within five days after receipt of goods. Clients using their own carriers will be responsible for filing their own freight claims if product is damaged in transit. Returns require an authorization number and must be made within 30 days. Custom orders and Consumables, such as projector lamps, may not be returned. Returns are subject to restocking fees with the exception of out of box failures and replacements under warranty. Restocking fees varying depending on the product line, expect a minimum charge of 25%. _____________________________ The information contained within this proposal is supplied to you on a confidential basis and is not for disclosure to any Total $650.00 organization without written consent of Tierney Brothers, Inc. This document is subject to the terms and conditions found here: www.tierneybrothers.com/SOTC Quote Serving the States of: IL | IN | IA | KY | MI | MN | OH | WI Remit To: 3300 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 (612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Quote #Date Page 1 of 2 4/20/2016 72416 Ship To Bill To City of Shakopee Accounts Payable 129 Holmes Street South City of Shakopee Shakopee MN 55379 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee MN 55379 ___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly ExpiresSales RepContractMemo 12/30/2016209 Heidi HarveyMNS-CPV 21594C - Conference room 148 (SC) QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price C - Conference room 148 revision 4 ---------------------Video Equipment--------------------- 1E65565 LED LCD Public Display Monitor w/built in ATSC/NTSC tuner,2,062.482,062.48 1920x1080 (FHD) native resolution, limited RS-232 control, HDMI x3, VGA, RCA Component/Composite, USB Media Player, Built in speakers, Tabletop stand not included, 3 Year Warranty 1Chief MountingCustom Package - Mounting Solution for 65 Display Including: Fixed138.97138.97 System (CustomWall Mount Design) 1Custom ProductExtron Cable Cubby 1200 with connections for HDMI, USB, Network,546.25546.25 BundleUSB Power, and AC 1Interface SystemCustom Package - HDMI extension System Including: transmitter,588.89588.89 receiver, misc hardware Owner Furnished Product - Small Form computer and CATV receiver both with HDMI outputs ---------------------Other Equipment and Services--------------------- 1Cables,Custom Package of Cables, Connectors and Hardware Including:482.75482.75 Connectors andCustom Adapter Ring, HDMI, Shielded Twisted Pair Cabling, Bulk HardwareCabling and Misc Hardware 1Services: Design -Services: Design - State Contract (Non Construction) Engineering424.00424.00 State Contractand Project Management Services 6.63 Hours at $64.00/Hour 1Services -State Contract (Non Construction) Installation Services (Non-Union,280.00280.00 Integration for MNNon Prevailing Wage; Normal Business Hours). Union and/or State ContractPrevailing Wage rate requirement will result in a change order to the client. 4 Hours at $70.00/Hour 1Programming andProgramming and Configuration Completed in the Field or In House115.00115.00 Configuration1 Hour at $115.00/Hour Includes 90-day Programming Warranty; allowing for modifications to be made to the initial functionality within this time frame at no charge. Appointment times determined by Tierney Brothers. Changes requested after this time will be billable at standard hourly rates. If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues Chapter 297A Section 70 Exemptions for Governments and Nonprofit Groups. Please inform us if this project will be used for Quote Quote #Date Page 2 of 2 4/20/2016 72416 QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price taxable purposes. If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable. * This quotation is for product and services included on the Minnesota State Contract only. * Additional components not available on Contract may be needed for the system to function as designed. * Installation and non contract items provided on separate quotation. The services on this page must be purchased in conjunction with the Integration services on the Contract Release portion of this proposal. * Cabling is a combination of pre-terminated product and bulk cable requiring termination with a specific compression tool. * Manufacturer's warranties only apply to product purchased on State Contract portion of this proposal. * Tierney Brothers, Inc. will assist in any vendor communications to obtain replacements or return product as specified in the Contract. To accept this quotation, complete the proposal summary page at the end of this document. Please review the terms, conditions and client responsibilities of this proposal in full. _____________________________ Please inspect product upon delivery. All claims for defective merchandise or errors in shipping must be made within five days after receipt of goods. Clients using their own carriers will be responsible for filing their own freight claims if product is damaged in transit. Returns require an authorization number and must be made within 30 days. Custom orders and Consumables, such as projector lamps, may not be returned. Returns are subject to restocking fees with the exception of out of box failures and replacements under warranty. Restocking fees varying depending on the product line, expect a minimum charge of 25%. _____________________________ The information contained within this proposal is supplied to you on a confidential basis and is not for disclosure to any Total $4,638.34 organization without written consent of Tierney Brothers, Inc. This document is subject to the terms and conditions found here: www.tierneybrothers.com/SOTC Quote Serving the States of: IL | IN | IA | KY | MI | MN | OH | WI Remit To: 3300 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 (612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Quote #Date 10/4/2016 72316 Ship To Bill To City of Shakopee Accounts Payable 129 Holmes Street South City of Shakopee Shakopee MN 55379 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee MN 55379 ___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly ExpiresSales RepContractMemo 1/2/2017209 Heidi HarveyTransaction Not EligibleC - Conference room 148 (NC) QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price C - Conference room 148 (NC) Non-Contract Services - This sale is consistent with the Contract Release Construction Language Modification associated with the MN State Contract. 1Services -Non Contract Installation Services - Construction Services by a575.00575.00 Integration for MNContract Vendor (Non-Union, Non Prevailing Wage; Normal Business State ContractHours). Union and/or Prevailing Wage rate requirement will result in a change order to the client. 6 Hours at $75.00/Hour and $200 Subcontractor installation To accept this quotation, complete the proposal summary page at the end of this document. Please review the terms, conditions and client responsibilities of this proposal in full. _____________________________ Please inspect product upon delivery. All claims for defective merchandise or errors in shipping must be made within five days after receipt of goods. Clients using their own carriers will be responsible for filing their own freight claims if product is damaged in transit. Returns require an authorization number and must be made within 30 days. Custom orders and Consumables, such as projector lamps, may not be returned. Returns are subject to restocking fees with the exception of out of box failures and replacements under warranty. Restocking fees varying depending on the product line, expect a minimum charge of 25%. _____________________________ The information contained within this proposal is supplied to you on a confidential basis and is not for disclosure to any Total $575.00 organization without written consent of Tierney Brothers, Inc. This document is subject to the terms and conditions found here: www.tierneybrothers.com/SOTC Quote Serving the States of: IL | IN | IA | KY | MI | MN | OH | WI Remit To: 3300 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 (612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Quote #Date Page 1 of 2 10/4/2016 83368 Ship To Bill To City of Shakopee Accounts Payable 129 Holmes Street South City of Shakopee Shakopee MN 55379 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee MN 55379 ___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly ExpiresSales RepContractMemo 1/2/2017209 Heidi HarveyMNS-CPV 21594D - Community Room 108 (SC) QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price D - Community Room 108 (SC) revision 4 ---------------------Video Equipment--------------------- 1PowerLite ProPowerLite Pro G6570WU Projector, WUXGA, 5200 Lumens,3,232.903,232.90 G6570WUw/standard lens, w/ HD BaseT 136442MODEL C,113DIAG 60X96NPA HCMW296.70296.70 1Chief MountingCustom Package - Mounting Solution for Projector Including:345.18345.18 System (CustomProjector mount, fixed pipe, ceiling plate, plenum ceiling box Design) 1Interface SystemCustom Package - HDMI switching / extension System Includes Four1,588.001,588.00 Input Scaler, HDMI Twisted Pair Receiver Input Plate Owner Furnished Product - Small Form computer and CATV receiver both with HDMI outputs ---------------------Audio Equipment--------------------- 1C2PSC2PS Control 2P Stereo Speaker Pair JBL -Black184.00184.00 2SPK811Universal Single Speaker Mount Black17.9735.94 ---------------------Control System--------------------- 1MLC Plus 100MediaLink Plus Controller - MLC Plus 100White and Black684.25684.25 White and BlackFaceplates, 2-Gang Faceplates, 2-Gang 170-1097-02SMB 110 Series115.00115.00 Surface Mount Boxes for US-Gang Products Two-gang, black ---------------A/V Furniture and Rack(s)--------------- 1LEX31-EBTExecutive Lectern1,176.911,176.91 Features: pullout keyboard tray, pocket door, fan, 14U rack frame, Locking front & rear doors, removable electronics pod, Thermowrap finish and casters for mobility. FINISH BLACK 1Equipment RackCustom Package of Equipment Rack Accessories (5-10 Space)284.52284.52 AccessoriesIncludes: Power Distribution, Three Space Trap, Rack Shelf, Vent Package 1 (5-10Panel, Misc Hardware, Rack Shelf Quote Quote #Date Page 2 of 2 10/4/2016 83368 QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price Space) ---------------------Other Equipment and Services--------------------- 1Cables,Custom Package of Cables, Connectors and Hardware Including:868.91868.91 Connectors andUniversal HDMI Adapter Ring, HDMI, VGA with Audio, Shielded HardwareTwisted Pair Cabling, Bulk Cabling and Misc Hardware 1Services: Design -Services: Design - State Contract (Non Construction) Engineering808.00808.00 State Contractand Project Management Services 12.63 Hours at $64.00/Hour 1Services -State Contract (Non Construction) Installation Services (Non-Union,822.00822.00 Integration for MNNon Prevailing Wage; Normal Business Hours). Union and/or State ContractPrevailing Wage rate requirement will result in a change order to the client. 11.74 Hours at $70.00/Hour 1Programming andProgramming and Configuration Completed in the Field or In House115.00115.00 Configuration1 Hour at $115.00/Hour Includes 90-day Programming Warranty; allowing for modifications to be made to the initial functionality within this time frame at no charge. Appointment times determined by Tierney Brothers. Changes requested after this time will be billable at standard hourly rates. If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues Chapter 297A Section 70 Exemptions for Governments and Nonprofit Groups. Please inform us if this project will be used for taxable purposes. If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable. * This quotation is for product and services included on the Minnesota State Contract only. * Additional components not available on Contract may be needed for the system to function as designed. * Installation and non contract items provided on separate quotation. The services on this page must be purchased in conjunction with the Integration services on the Contract Release portion of this proposal. * Cabling is a combination of pre-terminated product and bulk cable requiring termination with a specific compression tool. * Manufacturer's warranties only apply to product purchased on State Contract portion of this proposal. * Tierney Brothers, Inc. will assist in any vendor communications to obtain replacements or return product as specified in the Contract. To accept this quotation, complete the proposal summary page at the end of this document. Please review the terms, conditions and client responsibilities of this proposal in full. _____________________________ Please inspect product upon delivery. All claims for defective merchandise or errors in shipping must be made within five days after receipt of goods. Clients using their own carriers will be responsible for filing their own freight claims if product is damaged in transit. Returns require an authorization number and must be made within 30 days. Custom orders and Consumables, such as projector lamps, may not be returned. Returns are subject to restocking fees with the exception of out of box failures and replacements under warranty. Restocking fees varying depending on the product line, expect a minimum charge of 25%. _____________________________ The information contained within this proposal is supplied to you on a confidential basis and is not for disclosure to any Total $10,557.31 organization without written consent of Tierney Brothers, Inc. This document is subject to the terms and conditions found here: www.tierneybrothers.com/SOTC Quote Serving the States of: IL | IN | IA | KY | MI | MN | OH | WI Remit To: 3300 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 (612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Quote #Date 8/18/2016 72428 Ship To Bill To City of Shakopee Accounts Payable 129 Holmes Street South City of Shakopee Shakopee MN 55379 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee MN 55379 ___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly ExpiresSales RepContractMemo 11/16/2016209 Heidi HarveyTransaction Not EligibleD - Community Room 108 (NC) QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price D - Community Room 108 Non-Contract Services - This sale is consistent with the Contract Release Construction Language Modification associated with the MN State Contract. 2031371FT 18 AWG OUTLET SAVER POWER EXTENSION CORD (NEMA3.006.00 5-15P TO NEMA 5-15R) 1Services -Non Contract Installation Services - Construction Services by a600.00600.00 Integration for MNContract Vendor (Non-Union, Non Prevailing Wage; Normal Business State ContractHours). Union and/or Prevailing Wage rate requirement will result in a change order to the client. 8 Hours at $75.00/Hour. To accept this quotation, complete the proposal summary page at the end of this document. Please review the terms, conditions and client responsibilities of this proposal in full. _____________________________ Please inspect product upon delivery. All claims for defective merchandise or errors in shipping must be made within five days after receipt of goods. Clients using their own carriers will be responsible for filing their own freight claims if product is damaged in transit. Returns require an authorization number and must be made within 30 days. Custom orders and Consumables, such as projector lamps, may not be returned. Returns are subject to restocking fees with the exception of out of box failures and replacements under warranty. Restocking fees varying depending on the product line, expect a minimum charge of 25%. _____________________________ The information contained within this proposal is supplied to you on a confidential basis and is not for disclosure to any Total $606.00 organization without written consent of Tierney Brothers, Inc. This document is subject to the terms and conditions found here: www.tierneybrothers.com/SOTC Quote Serving the States of: IL | IN | IA | KY | MI | MN | OH | WI Remit To: 3300 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 (612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Quote #Date Page 1 of 2 4/19/2016 72346 Ship To Bill To City of Shakopee Accounts Payable 129 Holmes Street South City of Shakopee Shakopee MN 55379 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee MN 55379 ___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly ExpiresSales RepContractMemo 12/30/2016209 Heidi HarveyMNS-CPV 21594 QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price F - Training Room 220 - State Contract revision 4 ---------------------Video Equipment--------------------- Owner Furnished Product - Panasonic DW530, mount, and Draper Screen from current Council Chambers 1IN1604 DTPFour Input Scaler with DTP Output1,259.251,259.25 1DTP HDMI 230 RxHDMI Twisted Pair Extender - Rx270.25270.25 1Interface SystemCustom Package - lectern wall plate87.0087.00 ---------------------Audio Equipment--------------------- 1C2PSC2PS Control 2P Stereo Speaker Pair JBL -Black184.00184.00 4SPK811Universal Single Speaker Mount Black17.9771.88 ---------------------Control System--------------------- 1MLC Plus 100MediaLink Plus Controller - MLC Plus 100White and Black684.25684.25 White and BlackFaceplates, 2-Gang Faceplates, 2-Gang ---------------A/V Furniture and Rack(s)--------------- 1LEX31-EBTExecutive Lectern1,176.911,176.91 Features: pullout keyboard tray, pocket door, fan, 14U rack frame, Locking front & rear doors, removable electronics pod, Thermowrap finish and casters for mobility. FINISH BLACK 1Equipment RackCustom Package of Equipment Rack Accessories (5-10 Space)245.27245.27 Accessories Package 1 (5-10 Space) ---------------------Other Equipment and Services--------------------- 1Cables,Custom Package of Cables, Connectors and Hardware602.18602.18 Connectors and Hardware 1Services: Design -Services: Design - State Contract (Non Construction) Engineering808.00808.00 State Contractand Project Management Services 12.63 Hours at $64.00/Hour Quote Quote #Date Page 2 of 2 4/19/2016 72346 QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price 1Services -State Contract (Non Construction) Installation Services (Non-Union,962.00962.00 Integration for MNNon Prevailing Wage; Normal Business Hours). Union and/or State ContractPrevailing Wage rate requirement will result in a change order to the client. 13.74 Hours at $70.00/Hour 1Programming andProgramming and Configuration Completed in the Field or In House115.00115.00 Configuration1 Hour at $115.00/Hour Includes 90-day Programming Warranty; allowing for modifications to be made to the initial functionality within this time frame at no charge. Appointment times determined by Tierney Brothers. Changes requested after this time will be billable at standard hourly rates. If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues Chapter 297A Section 70 Exemptions for Governments and Nonprofit Groups. Please inform us if this project will be used for taxable purposes. If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable. * This quotation is for product and services included on the Minnesota State Contract only. * Additional components not available on Contract may be needed for the system to function as designed. * Installation and non contract items provided on separate quotation. The services on this page must be purchased in conjunction with the Integration services on the Contract Release portion of this proposal. * Cabling is a combination of pre-terminated product and bulk cable requiring termination with a specific compression tool. * Manufacturer's warranties only apply to product purchased on State Contract portion of this proposal. * Tierney Brothers, Inc. will assist in any vendor communications to obtain replacements or return product as specified in the Contract. To accept this quotation, complete the proposal summary page at the end of this document. Please review the terms, conditions and client responsibilities of this proposal in full. _____________________________ Please inspect product upon delivery. All claims for defective merchandise or errors in shipping must be made within five days after receipt of goods. Clients using their own carriers will be responsible for filing their own freight claims if product is damaged in transit. Returns require an authorization number and must be made within 30 days. Custom orders and Consumables, such as projector lamps, may not be returned. Returns are subject to restocking fees with the exception of Subtotal 6,465.99 out of box failures and replacements under warranty. Restocking fees varying depending on the product line, expect a Shipping Cost (UPS Ground) 0.00 minimum charge of 25%. _____________________________Total $6,465.99 The information contained within this proposal is supplied to you on a confidential basis and is not for disclosure to any organization without written consent of Tierney Brothers, Inc. This document is subject to the terms and conditions found here: www.tierneybrothers.com/SOTC Quote Serving the States of: IL | IN | IA | KY | MI | MN | OH | WI Remit To: 3300 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 (612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Quote #Date 10/4/2016 72429 Ship To Bill To City of Shakopee Accounts Payable 129 Holmes Street South City of Shakopee Shakopee MN 55379 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee MN 55379 ___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly ExpiresSales RepContractMemo 1/2/2017209 Heidi HarveyTransaction Not Eligible QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price F - Training Room 220 - Non Contract Non-Contract Services - This sale is consistent with the Contract Release Construction Language Modification associated with the MN State Contract. 1Integration ItemNC5FXX6.486.48 Neutrix 5 pin XLR Female 1Services -Non Contract Installation Services - Construction Services by a1,912.001,912.00 Integration for MNContract Vendor (Non-Union, Non Prevailing Wage; Normal Business State ContractHours). Union and/or Prevailing Wage rate requirement will result in a change order to the client. 9 Hours at $75.00/Hour and $1387 in Subcontractor labor To accept this quotation, complete the proposal summary page at the end of this document. Please review the terms, conditions and client responsibilities of this proposal in full. _____________________________ Please inspect product upon delivery. All claims for defective merchandise or errors in shipping must be made within five days after receipt of goods. Clients using their own carriers will be responsible for filing their own freight claims if product is damaged in transit. Returns require an authorization number and must be made within 30 days. Custom orders and Consumables, such as projector lamps, may not be returned. Returns are subject to restocking fees with the exception of Subtotal 1,918.48 out of box failures and replacements under warranty. Restocking fees varying depending on the product line, expect a Shipping Cost (UPS Ground) 10.00 minimum charge of 25%. _____________________________Total $1,928.48 The information contained within this proposal is supplied to you on a confidential basis and is not for disclosure to any organization without written consent of Tierney Brothers, Inc. This document is subject to the terms and conditions found here: www.tierneybrothers.com/SOTC Quote Serving the States of: IL | IN | IA | KY | MI | MN | OH | WI Remit To: 3300 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 (612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Quote #Date Page 1 of 2 10/4/2016 83371 Ship To Bill To City of Shakopee Accounts Payable 129 Holmes Street South City of Shakopee Shakopee MN 55379 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee MN 55379 ___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly ExpiresSales RepContractMemo 1/2/2017209 Heidi HarveyMNS-CPV 21594G - Conference room 203 (SC) R4 QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price G - Conference room 203 (SC) revision 4 ---------------------Video Equipment--------------------- 1E65565 LED LCD Public Display Monitor w/built in ATSC/NTSC tuner,2,062.482,062.48 1920x1080 (FHD) native resolution, limited RS-232 control, HDMI x3, VGA, RCA Component/Composite, USB Media Player, Built in speakers, Tabletop stand not included, 3 Year Warranty 1Chief MountingCustom Package - Mounting Solution for 65 Display Including: Fixed138.97138.97 System (CustomWall Mount Design) 1Custom ProductExtron Cable Cubby 1200 with connections for HDMI, USB, Network,546.25546.25 BundleUSB Power, and AC 1Interface SystemCustom Package - HDMI extension System Including: transmitter,588.89588.89 receiver, misc hardware Owner Furnished Product - Small Form computer and CATV receiver both with HDMI outputs ---------------------Other Equipment and Services--------------------- 1Cables,Custom Package of Cables, Connectors and Hardware Including:493.75493.75 Connectors andCustom Adapter Ring, HDMI, Shielded Twisted Pair Cabling, Bulk HardwareCabling and Misc Hardware 1Services: Design -Services: Design - State Contract (Non Construction) Engineering424.00424.00 State Contractand Project Management Services 6.63 Hours at $64.00/Hour 1Services -State Contract (Non Construction) Installation Services (Non-Union,472.00472.00 Integration for MNNon Prevailing Wage; Normal Business Hours). Union and/or State ContractPrevailing Wage rate requirement will result in a change order to the client. 6.74 Hours at $70.00/Hour 1Programming andProgramming and Configuration Completed in the Field or In House115.00115.00 Configuration1 Hour at $115.00/Hour Includes 90-day Programming Warranty; allowing for modifications to be made to the initial functionality within this time frame at no charge. Appointment times determined by Tierney Brothers. Changes requested after this time will be billable at standard hourly rates. If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues Chapter 297A Section 70 Exemptions for Governments and Nonprofit Groups. Please inform us if this project will be used for Quote Quote #Date Page 2 of 2 10/4/2016 83371 QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price taxable purposes. If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable. * This quotation is for product and services included on the Minnesota State Contract only. * Additional components not available on Contract may be needed for the system to function as designed. * Installation and non contract items provided on separate quotation. The services on this page must be purchased in conjunction with the Integration services on the Contract Release portion of this proposal. * Cabling is a combination of pre-terminated product and bulk cable requiring termination with a specific compression tool. * Manufacturer's warranties only apply to product purchased on State Contract portion of this proposal. * Tierney Brothers, Inc. will assist in any vendor communications to obtain replacements or return product as specified in the Contract. To accept this quotation, complete the proposal summary page at the end of this document. Please review the terms, conditions and client responsibilities of this proposal in full. _____________________________ Please inspect product upon delivery. All claims for defective merchandise or errors in shipping must be made within five days after receipt of goods. Clients using their own carriers will be responsible for filing their own freight claims if product is damaged in transit. Returns require an authorization number and must be made within 30 days. Custom orders and Consumables, such as projector lamps, may not be returned. Returns are subject to restocking fees with the exception of out of box failures and replacements under warranty. Restocking fees varying depending on the product line, expect a minimum charge of 25%. _____________________________ The information contained within this proposal is supplied to you on a confidential basis and is not for disclosure to any Total $4,841.34 organization without written consent of Tierney Brothers, Inc. This document is subject to the terms and conditions found here: www.tierneybrothers.com/SOTC Quote Serving the States of: IL | IN | IA | KY | MI | MN | OH | WI Remit To: 3300 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 (612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Quote #Date 10/4/2016 83370 Ship To Bill To City of Shakopee Accounts Payable 129 Holmes Street South City of Shakopee Shakopee MN 55379 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee MN 55379 ___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly ExpiresSales RepContractMemo 1/2/2017209 Heidi HarveyTransaction Not EligibleG - Conference room 203 (NC) R4 QtyItemDescriptionPriceExt. Price G - Conference room 203 (NC) Revision 4 Non-Contract Services - This sale is consistent with the Contract Release Construction Language Modification associated with the MN State Contract. 1Services -Non Contract Installation Services - Construction Services by a642.00642.00 Integration for MNContract Vendor (Non-Union, Non Prevailing Wage; Normal Business State ContractHours). Union and/or Prevailing Wage rate requirement will result in a change order to the client. 6 Hours at $75.00/Hour and $200 Subcontractor installation To accept this quotation, complete the proposal summary page at the end of this document. Please review the terms, conditions and client responsibilities of this proposal in full. _____________________________ Please inspect product upon delivery. All claims for defective merchandise or errors in shipping must be made within five days after receipt of goods. Clients using their own carriers will be responsible for filing their own freight claims if product is damaged in transit. Returns require an authorization number and must be made within 30 days. Custom orders and Consumables, such as projector lamps, may not be returned. Returns are subject to restocking fees with the exception of out of box failures and replacements under warranty. Restocking fees varying depending on the product line, expect a minimum charge of 25%. _____________________________ The information contained within this proposal is supplied to you on a confidential basis and is not for disclosure to any Total $642.00 organization without written consent of Tierney Brothers, Inc. This document is subject to the terms and conditions found here: www.tierneybrothers.com/SOTC 3300 University Avenue SE Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 www.tierneybrothers.com 612.331.5500800.933.7337Fax -612.331.3424 Responsibilities and Conditions Tierney Brothers Responsibilities (Upon Authorization) Client Responsibilities Contract a licensed electrician to provide high voltage power Proceed with ordering the specified equipment and preparing a connections. The system design will determine if optimum schedule for completion of the proposed services. placement of outlets is best achieved before or after the installation of the AV equipment. The assigned Project Manager will Conduct pre-installation site visit (if necessary) involving the main site communicate the specific to you during the project planning. contact, site facilities representatives and a Tierney Brothers' project Tierney Brothers recommends that each projector, TV, plasma, LCD, manager or a qualified alternate. etc. have a dedicated quad electrical outlet. Review scope, terms and conditions of the installation with the client Provide Tierney Brothers with any existing system design at the pre-installation site visit. This will include, but is not limited to specifications, diagrams, room drawings or other materials that electrical, construction and cosmetic responsibilities. would facilitate completion of the proposed Scope of Integration Basic system training, separate from Professional Development, is Services. included in this proposal. This training will be scheduled and All necessary ceiling tile work involved in the installation, unless an completed by a Tierney Brothers' representative at the end of the alternative has been indicated in the Scope of Integration Services project installation. in this proposal. If Professional Development is part of this proposal, sessions must be Prepare, replace, repair or modify any structural or cosmetic scheduled within six months of install completion. changes that Tierney Brothers has made or needs to make. This includes, but is not limited to, ceiling grids, floor tiles, walls and pre-Clients purchasing SMARTboards: After the installation of the existing equipment. This does not include repair for accidental SMARTboard is complete, the SMARTboard USB connection will be damage caused by Tierney Brothers. tested using the Tierney Brothers installer's laptop. After system functionality is confirmed, the USB connection will be hooked into Confirm area is ready for installation when scheduled. This includes the client's computer if it is present in the space. but is not limited to the room being vacated, physical conditions confirmed and owner furnished equipment (OFE) available. If the For safety reasons, Tierney Brothers will not modify/cut the trays on area is not prepared for installation when scheduled or the client existing white boards or chalk boards. A solution for mounting over has not notified Tierney Brothers five business days in advance of any the existing board will be proposed. Any modifications to the schedule change or installation cancellation, there will be a $350.00 existing board would need to be made by the customer prior to the charge. Rescheduling of the installation will be set for a later date arrival for Tierney Brothers’ installation personnel. as determined by Tierney Brothers. Scheduling TBI will not be responsible for the condition and functionality of any Installations are typically scheduled six to eight weeks from receipt existing OFE during the installation process. This includes de-install of the customer’s purchase order. Custom ordered product may and reinstall of OFE. Should existing equipment fail or not work increase the time needed to complete the proposed services. properly with our system design, the customer will have the option of sourcing a TBI approved replacement part or TBI will offer a billable Standard service and support is limited to Monday through Friday, replacement alternative. If OFE malfunction causes delays in the 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM central standard time, excluding national installation timeframe, additional billable labor charges may apply.holidays. Expanded service hours may be available for an additional charge if determined necessary. Clients purchasing SMART product are responsible for loading all This schedule assumes no delays or obstacles will be encountered in SMART software on the applicable computers and connection of gaining access for the installation. these computers to the SMARTboard prior to any scheduled training sessions. Site Conditions Tierney Brothers cannot enter into work in or otherwise disturb any Complete Customer Configuration Worksheets as requested by areas containing asbestos. Tierney Brothers within five business days. This information is required to properly integrate the new equipment with your existing IT infrastructure. Tierney Brothers recommends that each Projector, TV, Plasma, LCD, etc. have a duplex receptacle fed off of a dedicated 20 amp circuit available for use. Systems containing multiple racks of TBI requires access to customer’s computer and network at the time amplifiers or other equipment may require additional circuits. of installation to be able to complete installation and testing of the designed system. Return visits to test equipment and functionality may result in additional charges. TBI’s initial estimates assume all work may be completed using standard ladders. If a lift is required, additional charges will be incurred and presented as part of a change request. For U of M Installations only: University of Minnesota customers are responsible for contacting their Facilities Management Department to coordinate conduit installation for all A/V wire and cable installations. Please initial to acknowledge and authorize the Responsibilities and Conditions presented here. ___________ 3300 University Avenue SE Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 www.tierneybrothers.com 612.331.5500800.933.7337Fax -612.331.3424 Proposal Terms Accounting Terms Other Terms For installations scheduled to take 30 days or less from the first day Installation Warranty on site to the last, Tierney Brothers will invoice the total project in full See specific warranty coverage program outlined in this proposal. upon substantial completion. Tierney Brothers reserves the right to bill progressively for installations which are scheduled to take more Repair or replacement service for TBI installed consumer grade than 30 days on site. The balance is due Net 30 days from the monitors/displays are subject to manufacturer warranty and installation completion date, with 2% interest added to unpaid service. TBI does offer de-install/re-install assistance for vendor balance. warranty repair or replacement at an additional charge. Sales Taxes Programming Warranty All applicable sales tax amounts will be charged on the sale of The programming warranty is 90 days, starting at the commission of goods or services according to each governing law and remitted to the system. Changes or fixes to the system after this time will be the proper taxing authority. If your organization is tax exempt, billable at our standard service call rates." please complete an exemption certificate and return to Tierney Brothers. Labor Classifications and Assumptions Unless mutually agreed upon in writing prior to executing this Proposal Changes agreement, it is the understanding of both parties that Union and/or If additional products or services are requested prior to receipt of Prevailing Wage regulations, specifically those contained in 40 your signed purchase order or quote proposal, Tierney Brothers will U.S.C. 276a-5, or MN Stat § 177.41-177.44, do not apply to the work provide an updated quote proposal, including a revised scope. If to be performed under this contract. additional products or services are requested after receipt of your signed purchase order or quote proposal, Tierney Brothers will Unless travel charges are specified, this proposal assumes Tierney provide a change request quote with the requested equipment Brothers, Inc. has local certified, licensed and insured technicians and scope to detail the requested changes for your approval.available to complete the integration services. In the event, the job site is located in a geographical area where this does not apply or Upon receipt of your signed purchase order or quote proposal, a specific installation time is requested for which this personnel is Tierney Brothers will proceed with the authorized services and not available, additional charges may apply. invoice in accordance with the purchase order or quote proposal. Verbal agreements will not be processed until confirmation, in All hours for installation are assumed to be between 8am and 5pm writing, has been received.(normal business hours) unless specified in this proposal. Request for work outside of normal business hours will be subject to the following There may be a 20% to 30% restocking fee plus freight charges for increased hourly labor rates: those items ordered which have to be returned to the manufacturer due to customer request or by change of order. Custom order - Second Shift (3:00pm to 10:00pm) will be billed at one and a products and certain product lines not typically carried by Tierney half times our standard labor rate. Brothers may not be returned. - Weekend or Holiday hours will be billed at two times our standard labor rate. Requests for installations outside our normal business hours are subject to approval by the Director of Post Sales Integration. NOTICE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION - The information in this proposal is proprietary and strictly confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the named parties. If the reader of this proposal is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of the information contained in this document is strictly prohibited. If this has been received in error, please notify the responsible party immediately and then delete this proposal from all data storage devices and destroy all hard copies. Video recording of a Tierney Brothers SMART Certified Trainer or Professional Development session, and copying or distribution of any printed material supplied by Tierney Brothers Inc., is protected content under copyright licensing and can be used only with express permission from Tierney Brothers, Inc. Any video or digital content created during a training session can be used only within the organization paying for such services and cannot be shared online or distributed in any manner. This quotation is valid for a period of 90 days. Please initial to acknowledge and authorize the Proposal Terms presented here. ___________ 3300 University Avenue SE Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 www.tierneybrothers.com 612.331.5500800.933.7337Fax -612.331.3424 Tierney Brothers 90 Day Limited Warranty Coverage Program Designed for: City of Shakopee Terms and Conditions Tierney Brothers, Inc. warrants the installation you have purchased from Tierney Brothers, Inc. from defects in materials and workmanship, under normal use, during the 90 Day Warranty period. Normal use is defined as operating the system within its designed specifications. The warranty period commences on the date of customer signoff, at the completion of the install by Tierney Brothers, Inc. During the warranty period, Tierney Brothers, Inc. will first work to resolve any problems by troubleshooting over the phone. If Tierney Brothers, Inc. Support Specialists determine that the issue cannot be resolved over the phone, a Technician will be dispatched to your location(s) within 72 hours of the original call (Monday through Friday 8:00am – 5:00pm, excluding national holidays). Customers outside of a 150 mile radius of Tierney Brothers, Inc. are subject to mileage and trip charges. If service is required after the 90 Day Warranty period has expired, the customer will be billed at Tierney Brothers, Inc. current labor rates. If the customer has purchased a Tierney Brothers, Inc. Extended Maintenance Agreement, that will commence at the end of the 90 Day Warranty. If you would like additional information regarding Tierney Brothers, Inc. Extended Maintenance Agreements, please contact your Tierney Brothers, Inc. Sales Representative at 612-331-5500. Obtaining Warranty Service To obtain warranty service, please use your custom support portal (support.tierneybrothers.com) and contact us via chat, phone, or email: https://support.tierneybrothers.com/ Click here for a short video explaining how to log in to your support portal your first time: http://content.jwplatform.com/players/TpGSX21s-kaM9q1Ga.html If you have any questions, please email support@tierneybrothers.com or call us at 800-933-7337. You can also call our advanced support line, 855-612-7762. Limitations of coverage The following items are excluded from coverage under the warranty: a. Equipment that has been removed or reinstalled in a different location b. Damage or other equipment failure due to causes beyond our control including, but not limited to, operator negligence, the failure to maintain the equipment according to the owner’s manual instructions, abuse, vandalism, theft, fire, flood, wind, freezing, power failure, inadequate power supply, acts of war or acts of God. c. Any utilization of equipment that is inconsistent with either the design of the equipment or the way the manufacturer intended the equipment to be used. d. 90 Day Onsite Warranty covers all hardware related failures, network or software related failures are not covered under Tierney Brothers, Inc. 90 Day Onsite Warranty. e. Operational or mechanical failure which is not reported prior to expiration of this contract. f. Equipment where the serial plate attached to the equipment is removed, defaced or made illegible. g. Damage resulting from unauthorized repair, software virus, improper electrical wiring and connections. h. Existing Owner Furnished equipment. i. Lift and Scaffolding rental is not included. This maintenance contract refers to: City Hall 11466 R4 I have read, understand and agree to the above terms and conditions per the plan elected. Authorized Signature: Date: Plan Type: 3300 University Avenue SE Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326 www.tierneybrothers.com 612.331.5500800.933.7337Fax -612.331.3424 City of Shakopee City Hall 11466 R4 Proposal Summary Please Initial to Accept or Decline Please Acknowledge All Proposals AcceptDecline A - New Council Chambers State Contract Total:$64,087.57 Non Contract Total:$6,327.99 Proposal Total:$ 70,415.56 B - Executive Conf. 111 State Contract Total:$6,057.27 Non Contract Total:$650.00 Proposal Total:$ 6,707.27 C - Conference Room 148 State Contract Total:$4,638.34 Non Contract Total:$575.00 Proposal Total:$ 5,213.34 D - Community Room 108 State Contract Total:$10,557.31 Non Contract Total:$606.00 Proposal Total:$ 11,163.31 F - Training Room 220 State Contract Total:$6,465.99 Non Contract Total:$1,928.48 Proposal Total:$ 8,394.47 G - Conference Room 203 R1 State Contract Total:$4,841.34 Non Contract Total:$642.00 Proposal Total:$ 5,483.34 Project Total:$ 107,377.29 *Project total if all proposals are accepted. The undersigned authorizes Tierney Brothers to proceed in accordance with the proposal including options elected and agrees as a representative of the client to be responsible for payment. By signing below, the client has read and understands the scope of services and agrees to the client responsibilities and conditions. Client's Name: Authorized Signature: *Client's Email Address: *Client's Email Address: Date: *Please note, one or more items on your quote may include software. Our vendors require two unique email addresses with different domain names to be submitted with software orders. These email addresses will receive the electronic key codes required to download and install your new software. Please include these two email addresses with your purchase order at the time your order is placed.