Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/07/1994 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items DATE: June 3, 1994 1 . Attached is the calendar of Upcoming Meetings for June. 2 . Attached is the June Business Update from City Hall . 3 . Attached are the May 3, 1994 minutes of the Shakopee Coalition meeting. 4 . Attached is correspondence from the City Administrator to the Louisville Town Board regarding the Lake O'Dowd aerators. 5 . Attached is a memorandum from the Finance Director regarding the 1993 Financial Report . 6 . Attached is a memorandum from the City Attorney regarding court appearances . 7 . Attached is the Monthly Progress Report for May from the Planning Department . 8 . Attached is a memorandum from the Police Chief regarding a street closing for St . Mary' s Festival on July 26th. 9 . Attached are the May 10, 1994 minutes of the Board of Review. 10 . Attached is correspondence to the Mayor from James Link regarding "The Shakopee City News" . 11 . Attached are the June 9th agendas for the Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment and Appeals meetings . 12 . Attached is the Police Newsletter for Council review. 13 . Attached is the Monthly Report from Engineering. 14 . Attached is correspondence from the MWCC regarding the Shakopee Forcemain Construction in 1994 . 15 . Attached are the May 23 , 1994 minutes of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meeting. 16 . Attached are the May 18, 1994 minutes of the Community Development Commission. 17 . Attached is the Building Activity Report for May. 18 . Attached is a memorandum from the Assistant City Administrator regarding the Stans Project Update. 19 . Attached is the Monthly Report from the Assistant City Administrator. 20 . Attached is correspondence to City Council from Ben Luth regarding the need for an ice arena. 21 . Attached is a memo from the City Clerk regarding the annexation agreement with Jackson Township. 22 . Attached is a memo from the City Administrator regarding additional information on proposed community center/TIF. Jun e 1 9 9 4 Upcoming Meetings SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 7:00pm Park & Rec - Public Hearing 5 6 '7 8 9 10 11 4:30pm Public 7:00pm City 7:30pm Planning Utilities Council Commission 6:00pm Community Development Commission 12 13 14 : 15 16 1? 18 7:00pm Park & Recreation 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 7:00pm Park & 7:00pm City Recreation Council (Tentative) 26 2? 28 29 30 7:O0pr. Park & 5:30pm Recreatcn Community Development Commission May July S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 BUSINESS UPDATE FROM CITY HALL Vol. 8 No. 6 Dear Chamber Member: June I, 1994 Administration The Stans house relocation project is slowly moving Shakopee City staff is currently working with forward. The home presently located at 135 West 3rd Minnesota Valley Transit Authority in an attempt to Avenue is scheduled to be relocated to its new site at develop a new transit program for Shakopee residents. 1124 East 2nd Avenue during the week of May 30th. The proposed program would provide express route Remodeling will then proceed with project completion service to Eden Prairie Center and Downtown scheduled for July. Minneapolis at scheduled times during the day. Peak a.m., mid-day and evening service is being considered at this time. The proposed program is scheduled for implementation later this Fall. The proposed service City Clerk would run on a fixed route through Shakopee transporting persons to Eden Prairie Center. At the On May 3, 1994, the Shakopee City Council approved Eden Prairie Center transit hub, riders would have the liquor licenses for Canterbury Park Concessions Inc. at opportunity to transfer to Southwest Metro vehicle the racetrack. buses going to various locations including Downtown Minneapolis, St. Paul and the Mega Mall. Riders would also have the opportunity to gain access to the Southwest Metro Dial-a-Ride Program which provides Community Development transit service to Chaska, Chanhassen and Eden Prairie. The Shakopee Community Development Commission has scheduled a special meeting to be held on June 6th at 6:00 p.m. to discuss the merits of establishing an Economic Development Authority. The Community Park and Recreation Development Commission will be evaluating whether or not the existing Housing and Redevelopment Authority On May 23, 1994 the Shakopee Park and Recreation should be maintained or if it could possibly be replaced Advisory Board held it's first public hearing to solicit with an Economic Development Authority. Staff public input with respect to facilities to be included in expects that the Community Development Commission a community center. A second public hearing was will be forwarding a recommendation to City Council scheduled for June 1, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. in the Shakopee for their consideration some time in July. An City Council Chambers. Upon soliciting public input Economic Development Authority can be granted the the Shakopee Park and Recreation Advisory Board will same powers as a Housing and Redevelopment be forwarding a recommendation to City Council with Authority. The Economic Development Authority respect to community center facilities and whether or would provide for some what broader activities in not a referendum should be held to generate additional terms of promoting economic development as compared funding for a facility beyond what can be funded with to the existing HRA. Additionally, the composition of the $6 million tax increment financing allocation. the EDA would be comprised of persons other than the Mayor and/or City Councilmembers. The Economic Development Authority Board could however include at least two Councilmembers. Once the exact nature of the facilities to be included in Police the community center can be determined, City officials will be preparing preliminary cost construction Training estimates and operating cost data. City staff is also now in the process of meeting with representatives from other communities who have constructed community Immigration Investigation - On May 9th. Investigator centers within the last five years in an attempt to gain Larry Olson presented training to help officers a greater understanding of problems that they may recognize improper or illegal immigration documents. have experienced both in construction and operating phases. Intoxilyzer School - Officer Craig Robson is now certified as an intoxilyzer operator. Work has commenced on two improvement projects at the Shakopee Pool. The main pool building is being Hostage Negotiation - Detective Bob Forberg received remodeled to include two family changing rooms. Both 32 hours of training. changing rooms will include restroom facilities that meet ADA requirements. Warrantless Searches - Officer Terry Doyle attended training presented by the Scott County Attorney's The waterslide is also receiving major repairs in an Office. effort to improve public safety. Total cost of these improvements is expected to not exceed S30,000.00. All School Activity improvements are tentatively scheduled for completion on June 3rd. Stranger Danger-On April 28th, Officer Tom Crocker and Sgt. Ray Erlandsen spoke to the Child Learning Center about stranger danger. Planning Diversion for First time Alcohol Offenders - Officer PC Meeting 5-05-94 torn Crocker spoke to first time offenders of minor BOAAJPC Handbook Distributed No Action consumption who are participating in the Scott County Comp. Plan Land Use Chapter Amendment Rec. App. court's diversion program. Jasper Road:CR16-Hauer Tr. Vacation Rec. App. MN Valley 8th Addition Final Plat Rec.App. Domestic Violence - Sgt. Barney Clark spoke to MUSA Extension W of CR79 C. Plan Amend. Rec. App. Scherer South PUD Pre. Der. Plan Cont. to 6-09 students in the Family Life class regarding domestic 2546 County Road 42 CUP Dog Kennel Denied violence and its prevention. 6896 Hwy 101 (Mine) Permit Renewal Approved &Annual Review Approved 7.5 acres south of Cretex Rezoning Cont. to 6-09 DARE GRADUATION - MAY 24TH AND 25TH The Planning Commission received and accepted the resignations of Commissioners Zak and Kelly. Julie Baumann completed her internship with the Planning Public Works/Engineering Department. The Engineering Department has been busy with ongoing city projects and numerous private developments. In the next month, bids will be opened for the Downtown Streetscape Project Phase II, Vierling Drive extension from County Road 16 to Presidential Lane, the Public Works Parking Lot Improvements Project and the 1994 Sidewalk Program. Construction of these projects is expected to be completed by this Fall. OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE COALITION May 3, 1994 The meeting was called to order at 4 : 30 p.m. by Chairman Judson Kenyon. Members present: Brian Norris, Citizens State Bank; Claude Kolb, Shakopee Lions/Knights of Columbus; Sister Esther Wagner, SACS Schools; Barb Brekke, Scott County Extension; Connie Uileber, Scott County Human Services; Barry Stock, City of Shakopee; Bonnie Sokolov, American Cancer Society; Sandy Olson, Southern Valley Alliance for Battered Woman; Judson Kenyon, CAP Agency; and Irene Sundboom, Front Steps. SACS SCHOOL Sister Esther reports that this is the last month of school. There will be three sessions of kindergarten for 1994 . CITY OF SHAKOPEE Barry reports some desks are available, contact Don McNeil. City is going to build a Community Center. Ice arena, pool and gym are the three large items involved. Cost around $6MM. Building could start this fall. Should be located south of the High School. Pool opens next month. Derby Days is coming up. Meeting this thursday at noon at Chamber. Looking to have a steak or chicken fry at the Derby Days. FRONT STEPS Irene informed us that Spring is a busy time at Front Steps. Looking for some volunteers for one on one activities. Would like to start a softball team for the folks at Front Steps. If you would like to help organize the softball team, donate for the purchase of equipment, or play contact Irene. CAP AGENCY Judson reports Transitional Housing is needed for the homeless and nearly homeless. HUD has made houses available. Individuals who have had mental illness are having a problem finding housing once they are released from treatment. This should help four to five people each year. Many of these individuals are receiving social security and have limited money for rent. If anyone has received damage from flooding, you should contact CAP Agency for possible government assistance. On May 21 nine homes will be renovated in Shakopee for Christmas in May. SCOTT COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES Connie reports they have survived the strike. Renovation is going well. Human Services is looking at linking with American Cancer Society to transport patients. Volunteer drivers are currently transporting patients. AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY Bonnie announced that they recently held a board meeting. Looking for a secretary and service chair. American Cancer Society serves the entire Scott County. President elect is from Prior Lake. Residential fund drive results are not in yet. Walk in the park has 20 teams already signed up. Cancer Mount is a one on one contact with a person who is diagnosed with cancer. Attended Shakopee Showcase. Will be doing a stop smoking program. SHAKOPEE LIONS Member Claude reports Christmas in May is coming up. SCOTT COUNTY EXTENSION Held a family night in Belle Plaine. Had a good turn out. Next fall will have a similar event in New Prague. Choices Program is going on at SACS. This is a alcohol awareness program. SOUTHERN VALLEY ALLIANCE Sandy reports that they just had a volunteer banquet. Have sixty volunteers. Looking at expanding current space. Next meeting of the Shakopee Coalition is scheduled for June 7, 1994 in the Citizens State Bank Building Community Room at 4:30p.m. Respectfully Submitted Brian Norris Secretary 4y SHAKOPEE May 20, 1994 Ms. Marion Schmidt, Chair Louisville Town Board 14275 Marystown Road Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Ms. Schmidt: Currently the City of Shakopee has a lease with the Save O'Dowd Lake Chain Association for the use of City property for the operation of aerators on Lake O'Dowd. Because of increased costs for insurance and electricity over the years, the Association is asking the City to take over the operation of the aerators. This includes the cost of maintenance of the aerators, providing electricity, obtaining permits from the DNR and undertaking certain safety precautions to insure the safety of persons frequenting the area - see enclosed letter from the City's loss control consultant. This request has been made to the City Council a number of times over the last three or four years. The City Council has consistently rejected taking on this added obligation. One of the options that staff is exploring is the possibility of Louisville Township and the City of Shakopee sharing in the cost of the operation of the two aerators on Lake O'Dowd, since the lake lies within both governmental jurisdictions. I am wondering if the Township would consider entering into an agreement with the City (for five years or so) sharing in the expenses for the maintenance and operation of the aerators. Cost for insurance would be minimal, since it would be added to the City policy. Electricity, signage, fencing, inspections and maintenance costs can only be estimated at this time. We estimate that the costs would be under $5,000 per year. This alternative has not been taken to City Council. Before doing so, I wanted to check with Louisville Township to see if they might be willing to share in the costs to continue the aeration of O'Dowd Lake. Would you please discuss this with the Township Board and get back to me. I would appreciate hearing from you by the 1st of July if possible. The City Council will begin their 1995 budget discussions sometime in July and this needs to be a part of the budget discussion. Please call me if you have any questions about this matter. Sincerely, / 14/-7 Dennis R. Kraft City Administrator COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 129 Holmes Street South• Shakopee,Minnesota• 55379-1351 • 612-445-3650 • FAX 612-445-6718 445- TO: TO: Frank Ries, Fire Chief FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: 1993 Financial Report DATE: May 25, 1994 Back in January/February I had requested of the Relief Association officers a couple of times that the Relief Association have their annual report done earlier this year. I sent a memo to the President of the Association requesting the report be completed no later than 4/30/94 . I have relayed several messages through the Fire Chief to have the report completed in a timely manner. Finally, I have been in contact several times with the Association Treasurer to get the report. The city report includes data from the Association report and therefore I can not complete the city report with out it. The city auditor's have been in City Hall and completed the bulk of their field work here by May 6. With the necessary lead times involved, Council is scheduled to get the city report on the second Council meeting in June which is the latest possible time to meet statutory deadlines. I have talked to Jim Streefland today. He has informed me that the delay is due to the Fire Department Treasurer not delivering the necessary material to him to be able to complete the report. Delivering material to the auditor at the end of May for a December year end results in getting a report that is a half year old when completed. It also delays the city report and in terms of the delay this year, is not acceptable. The Fire Department and Relief Association should be able to have the report completed and filed with the City Clerk by March 15th. cc: City Administrator Council MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Karen Marty, City Attorney DATE: May 24, 1994 RE: Court Appearances Charts Attached are the April and May Court Appearances charts. As you can see, we continue to see more and more time needed in court . This is a busy year! Signed Arie • Karen Mar y, Ci- .ttorney KEM:bjm [24MEMO] cc: Dennis Kraft rn W.W. .16AWA iM• ' :4444///// /////////////X/////////////227///////////// Ir "-_'///////////////////////// ...........:.:! \\\\\\\\" i /////////////////////////////////////////////// N r. , ❖:❖:❖X.:❖:❖ 4\\\\\\\\\\`:•: Z::%///////. %///////////////////////////////////, o C/) en p• W a in iii mom ':/// \\\\\\I..1//// //////////////////mmMNNMIirm=mIIIIEMMMOMMM• c:' N ' \ Llllll�!itil�!i!�lilitililili!iw\i ///////////////44. 42/////////////////////////////////// — O ...... 't; 9%///////. //////////////////////////////. Z.---111.111111.11/////////, N O' g i565.9 C4 !:..!:•:!:!..:;:::::'�////////MIMMIMMMI ////////////////////////IMIM//////� `" ° H a — �� 00 N a C7 U w ^ j a+"511\Miiiiiie // / , ////////////////, ��� N .UA.M.eWW64\\\\\-- —/. ///////////, e Dov: 10 a i\ //////////, ,////X/////4X7/X///////////////////////// r6 � cN ElimisomimionnimNINIm ;716 eq +-I ::::tib.`:ee❖:Li\+ V . ////22//22/ /2222//// Zy) Ci) VD ._.4,SS:!\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ i%/4444//44. 44////////////////////////////////. aminimmisimmismileiniIIMMIIII v; cn O 's v:i\\\\:46666e/i //////1////////////////////////////////////1 Z :::::::�:.:4\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\o -/////� ///////////////////////// 4; .x•x...,.. \\..W////////i ///////////////////////////////, B 71- --�� N w i%///////. %////////////////////////////////////////. z` ca.., 0 CT I ������ N %: ::• :•:.: . N•: 44//////////i /7////////////// //// //// Z M eq en en t:'.:!w•:!:•..ff•iQ\\\\•G M %//7//////////////2/444/.4 V) �MINI=MMINIIIIIIIIIIMM1111111111111111111•1111M en = !w❖.:!:!;\\\\V 4///4/////////////= ///� ////_ / c�' CCS N Ce:MO%/A %/////////////////////X C v) 1-4 7Fg :.0\\\\\\----V//,/ //////////////////////////////, b . inismiimommosammommmentimmi N ISS Y///////////////////. ////////////////////// � a) r,` V � ti / i saouiiiaddV jo iagmnN j °' ' " j � Jo. .- Cr) w %,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,/,...//.,,,...,,,,,..//..,,,,,./,,,,,,,.. U L UW////////////////////////////////////////4 Z �i///////////////iii, ---- > i///,/,//•//•///•//••////////•••••• Z Q IP i 0 CIC7/////////////////7///2///r//////////////////2////W2/9222 ci_ p < ./////////r//////////////////////////////////////// /i W W �- 1111 aW i/////////////////////////////////////////, < aNo / /• D_ ///////////////////////////////////////////, Z O F. 0 A D 2 ,,,/,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ::>,D Dca ...2w4rr/rr///./r/rrr,/rrr, /r////////////////r//r/„///r,,, 1111111111111 cc O „r/////////////////////////////, (I.) IT "}' 9i1111111111 1111111 11: Q J111111111111111111111111111 co ......,,, ,, w Qu_ H 1111111111miiiiiiiiiii z z.,„„,„,... 0 F— o . . . . . . . . .. . 0 0) c0 N. (D tf) Tt Cl N r r SdONVEIddddd JO bd8Wf1N 44-ri Monthly Progress Report Planning Department May 31, 1994 PROJECT START COMPLETE STATUS COMMENTS Administration 1. U of Mn Intern 9/20/93 6/15/94 90% Amy Wicklund 2. St. Cloud State Intern 3/07/94 5/26/94 100% Julie Baumann 3. 1995-1999 CIP 3/01/94 7/01/94 30% Preparing project requests 4. File System Reorganization 4/15/94 6/15/94 75% In progress 5. Application Packet Revisions 1/15/94 6/15/94 100% Ready for use once Zoning Ord is adopted Long Range Planning 1. Comp Plan Policies Review 4/01/94 7/30/94 30% PC review continuing 2. Land Use Plan 3/01/93 8/01/94 50% Research 3. East Shak Trans Plan 1/01/93 4/01/95 25% RTD area traffic generation 4. Zoning Ord Update (text) 6/01/93 6/07/94 100% City Council to approve 5. Zoning Mapping 1/01/94 9/01/94 10% Planning Commission initial discussions 6. Chaska hit Conditions 7/01/93 2/01/95 20% Rural Density, MUSA 7. Riverfront Design Plan 5/01/94 8/01/94 5% Consultant selected: Brauer & Assoc. 8. Capital Improvement Plan 3/01/94 7/15/94 15% Projects identified by departments Current Planning 1. Building Permits 5/01/94 5/26/94 Ongoing 68 Residential permits 6 Commercial permits 2 Industrial permits 2. Planning Reports 5/01/94 5/26/94 Ongoing 0 Variances 0 Appeals of CA 3 CUP 1 Plats 1 PUD 1 Rezoning 1 Vacations 0 Minor Subdivisions 0 Official Map Reviews 0 Registered Land Surveys 1 Other: PC/BOAA Handbook 2 Other: Comp Plan Amendment 3. Enforcement 5/01/94 5/26/94 Ongoing 5 Code Violations (Zoning) 3 Resolved Violations Management Information Systems (MIS) 1. GIS Stage One 10/01/93 10/01/94 5% Features list done 2. PC Hardware Upgrade 11/09/93 5/20/94 100% Complete 3. Install File Server 11/09/93 5/20/94 100% Complete 4. Install New PCs: Police Dept. 4/20/94 5/10/94 100% Complete 5. Evaluate Scheduling Software 5/01/94 6/01/94 25% In progress 6. Network Security 5/01/94 7/01/94 0% Beginning 7. Quarterly Staff Work Program 5/20/94 6/01/94 5% Beginning {WP5i\DOCS\AMY\MON HLY\PROGRFT.MAY} 5(2644 Monthly Progress Report Planning Department Continued PC Meeting 5-05-94 BOAA/PC Handbook Distributed No Action Comp Plan Land Use Chapter Comp Plan Amendment Recommended Approval Jasper Road: CR16-Hauer Trail Vacation Recommended Approval Minnesota Valley 8th Addition Final Plat Recommended Approval MUSA Extension West of CR79 Comp Plan Amendment Recommended Approval Scherer South PUD Pre. Development Plan Continued to 6-09 2546 County Road 42 CUP Dog Kennel Denied 6896 Hwy 101 (Mine) CUP Renewal Approved & Annual Review Approved 7.5 acres south of Cretex Rezoning Continued to 6-09 Other Activities The Planning Commission received and accepted the resignations of Commissioners Zak and Kelly. Julie Baumann completed her internship with the Planning Department and graduated from St. Cloud State. Good luck Julie! {WP5I\DOCS\AMY\MONTHLYWROGRPT.MAY) 5!26/94 8 TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Tom Steininger, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Street Closing DATE: 05 26 94 INTRODUCTION: St. Mary's Church has been authorized to close 6th Avenue between Lewis and Sommerville Streets for their Parish Festival on July 26, 1994 from 10: 00 a.m. until 6: 00 p.m. BACKGROUND: Each year at this time, St. Mary' s receives permission to close the street for their parish festival. They are very careful about this and not been the cause of any complaints in the past. Council has indicated that I should act on such requests and keep them advised. ACTION REQUESTED: None. Memo provided for information only. Church of St. Mary 111(4 535 South Lewis Street * Shakopee, MN 55379-1499 May 11 , 1994 Dear Chief Steininger, I am writing once again at the behest of the parish festival committee with the request for the closure of East Sixth Avenue on Sunday, July 26th from 10:00 AM until 6:00 PM. We hope that this will be permitted as in the past. The house- holds on the street would be allowed access for most of the day, as what is planned will take only a portion of the time and possibly only a portion of the space as well . Sincerely yours ' 7A—Jer-i, - -% pastor *9 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF REVIEW REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 10, 1994 Councilor Sweeney called the meeting to order at 7: 00 p.m. with Steve Clay, Eldon Reinke, Richard Marks, and Councilor Lynch present. Also present were: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk and Robert Schmitt, Deputy County Assessor. Reinke/Lynch moved to nominate Robert Sweeney as Chairman. Councilor Sweeney asked for further nominations and there being none nominations were closed. There was a unanimous vote for Councilor Sweeney as Chairman. Mr. Schmitt explained the purpose of the Board of Review. He went on to explain the assessments for Shakopee for 1994 . Mr. Schmitt explained that the County places a market value on property. By State law the market value must be at least 90%. This year property in Shakopee received an increase of 7% because the ratio study showed a percent of 86% which is below what the State says it should be. He explained that if he didn't increase the ratio to be between the 90%-105% required by the State that the State would do it and then no one could appeal their assessment. He stated that the taxes should not go up because all the properties went up some (assuming that the taxing jurisdictions do not increase their budgets) . Mr. Schmitt explained that if someone's assessment went up approximately 7%, and if it is lowered, there is an obligation to lower everyone else's. Then the State can come in and they would increase the assessments in increments of 5%. Chairman Sweeney asked that the record acknowledge receipt of three letters from property owners asking that their market value be reduced: Donald and Barbara Booth, 1746 County Road 18 (27-913017- 0 and 27-913005-0) , Jonathan P. Crist, 936 Holmes Street So. (27- 002006-0) , and Mel Lebens, 538 Fourth Avenue West. Chairman Sweeney invited comments from members in the audience in order from a sign-up sheet. Darlene and Leslie Crowley, 725 Atwood, asked how their increase was considered over the 7% increase. They converted a garage into a family room and it cost them $6, 900 labor and materials. Their value went from $69 , 500 to $82 , 800. Mr. Schmitt will check into it. Ted Jasper stated that the condos located at 438 Dakota Street are valued above what they can be sold for. He said that they were build in 1970, some have never sold, and they will never sell for the $29 , 200 proposed assessment. Mr. Schmitt will check into it. Official Proceedings of the May 10, 1994 Shakopee Board of Review Page -2- Belinda Rusch, 939 Holmes, stated that she thinks the $6, 100 increase on her real estate is to high. Verda Wolf, 922 Lewis, stated that she thinks the $6, 300 increase on her real estate is a steep increase and acknowledged that it is 7% o. Stan Mack, 1109 Jefferson, stated that his property is set at $103, 000 and that the realtors he has talked to think that this is a big joke. He believes that the value should probably be more like $95, 000. Mr. Schmitt will check into it. Fred Krueger, 1028 So. Pierce, said that his property went up 7% this year and 13% two years ago. He said that he had his property appraised and that the assessor's value is off $7, 000. (27-021016- 0) Rick Hennes, 1040 Pierce, stated that he value was raised 10% two years ago and now an additional 7%. He said his property was appraised in 1992 at $92, 000. He would like it reviewed. Mr. Schmitt will check into it. (27-058005-0) Richard Krebs, 1291 Diamond Court, stated that his value went up 7% although he refinanced his property last fall at $106, 000 versus the value now placed at $111,800. Mr. Schmitt will check into it. (27-131072-0) Roger Knudson, 821 Lewis, stated that an alley was just brought to the attention of the City this year because of tax delinquency. He said that the ownership was in doubt and that nothing was done. Mr. Schmitt said that he thought that the value had been reduced and that he will check into it. (27-001793-0) Peter Eide, 811 East 3rd, stated that adding 7% brought his value to $89 , 100 and that he recently refinanced his property and it was appraised at $82, 000. He said that it would have been nice to put something in the paper about the 7% increase. He also mentioned that the East side of his new alley is too steep and it collects snow in the winter. Mr. Schmitt will check into it. Al Berkland stated that the four lots he owns on 4th and 1st went up 10% . He said that he wished he could find a buyer for what the value went up. Mr. Schmitt explained that commercial and industrial property went up 10%. (27-001091-0, 27-001090-1) Judy Redfield, 1850 Hillside Drive, said that she came out of interest. She said that her value went up 7% which is in line with everyone else. Official Proceedings of the May 10, 1994 Shakopee Board of Review Page -3- Chairman Sweeney reminded everyone that only if the levy goes up will the taxes go up, as a result of the 7% increase for all properties. Ron Schmitt, 2514 Hauer Trail, stated that he has the information that Mr. Schmitt had requested. (27-001106-0 and 27-908063-0) Dennis Griffith, 3320 Marschall Road, stated that he was present to support Ted Jasper on the valuations for Macey Manor. Mark Kuechenmeister, Parkside Printing, 321 West 1st Avenue, stated that his commercial property went up 10%, 15% total in the last two years. Mr. Schmitt explained that his property received a 5% increase from the State last year. Mr. Kuechenmeister stated that his parking lot also went up. Mrs. Schmitt stated that he would compare Mr. Kuechenmeister's property with other properties. Randy Schubert, 8358 Eagle Creek Blvd. , stated that his value has increased $26, 000 since 1990. He questioned why there was a difference in value from his property at 938 Pierce? Mr. Schmitt stated that a duplex is valued differently and that it is based on income. Mr. Schmitt will look into the values. Cletus Link, 1216 Jefferson St. , expressed comments and concerns. He said that he got an increase like everyone else. He said when property is selling the values go up, he questioned if the values would go down when there is a recession. He expressed concern about the small business staying in business against larger business. How much more taxes can small businesses absorb and stay in business? Greg Wiegold, 3000 CR-42, stated that he called four real estate agents and got the same answers from each. Would a 400' high voltage affect the value - yes, would it affect the salability - yes, would a 100 dog kennel near by affect the value - yes, if the road was ripped up for two-three years would this affect the value - yes, during construction. He said that he is budgeted right out of his house. He mentioned a case where someone built a home and the value placed on it is $20, 000 less than what it cost to build. He also suggested taking a look at properties where there is a business being run out of the house. Marvin Stier, 537 Spencer St. , stated that his value went up more than 7% and that there is no way he could get $74 , 500 for his property. Mr. Schmitt will check into his value. Bob Messer, 1650 West 6th Avenue, said that his value went frons $74, 900 to $80, 100 and asked if it went up 7% . Mr. Clay answered yes. Official Proceedings of the May 10, 1994 Shakopee Board of Review Page -4- Anne Topp, 1262 S. Polk, (27-102003-0) said that her townhouse went up 7%. Mr. Schmitt stated that townhomes do not appreciate as other properties and that he will look at recent sales of townhomes. Bonnie Mintz stated that she lives South of Shakopee, that she is in real estate and has several questions relating to the assessment process and taxes. Mr. Schmitt responded to the questions. Steve Schmitz, 1005 Miller St. , stated that he bought his house a year ago and that it went up 7%. He said that there is no way he could get $102 , 300 for it. Mr. Schmitt will look into it. Sherman Thurmer, 742 Madison, (27-017051-0) stated that his value has increased $11, 000 in four years and that he would like someone to look into it. Mr. Schmitt will look into it. Chairman Sweeney asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak. There was no response. Chairman Sweeney stated that Mr. Schmitt will get in touch with the people who questioned the values on their property and bring a written report to the Board of Review. The Board of Review will go over each property and make a determination on whether or not to support Mr. Schmitt's recommendation. Cole Van Horn walked in and was recognized by Chairman Sweeney. Mr. Van Horn stated that his property was raised 7%. Mr. Schmitt explained that all properties were raised 7% across the board to keep the State from making a 10% raise. Mr. Schmitt stated that George Realander (27-001840-0) wants his property read into the record. Mr. Schmitt was asked if Sharon Fernholz had gotten in touch with him. Her property was also made part of the record. The next Board of Review meeting was set for Thursday, May 26, 1994 at 7 : 00 p.m. Lynch/Marks moved to adjourn at 8 : 50 p.m. c °1(-- �aith S. Cox City Clerk Recording Secretary 1r �o JJJJ!J. 5 J�M]J� rJ J,:it--)tai.1 fit I i REAL ESTATE APPRAISALS A LINK GROUP COMPANY Shakopee Office Suite 4130,421 First Avenue East Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone: (612)445-3060 Fax: (612)496-3292 • I May 23 , 1994 Mayer Gary Laurent City of Shakopee 129 So Holmes Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mayor Laurent; Just a brief note to let you know that I really appreciated receiving the inaugural issue of "The Shakopee City News" . I think it's a great idea and hope the publication not only continues, but expands with maturity and frequency. These are exciting times for Shakopee. In spite of some of the "nay sayers" , I belive most residents share the excitement and look forward to a growing, progressive and prosperous future for our community. Continue the good work and best of luck in your decisions. Respectfully, James A. Link TENTATIVE AGENDA BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Regular Session Shakopee, MN June 9, 1994 Chairperson William Mars Presiding 1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of Agenda 3 . Approval of May 5, 1994 , Meeting Minutes 4 . Recognition by Board of Adjustment and Appeals of Interested Citizens. 5 . 7 : 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for a variance to expand the hours of operation specified in the City Code for Mineral Extraction and Land Rehabilitation Permits, for a mine located at 6896 Hwy. 101. Applicant: J. L. Shiely Co. Action: Resolution No. 687 6 . 7 : 35 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for a 7 ; variance from the 35' street side yard setback requirement in the R-3 Zoning District, in order to build an addition onto the house at 306 Sommerville St. Applicant: Timothy R. Rein Action: Resolution No. 685 7 . 7 : 40 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for a variance from the acceptable exterior building material requirements in order to keep the building appearances uniform at 800 W. 1st Ave. Applicant: Rahr Malting Company Action: Resolution No. 684 8 . Other Business a. b. 9 . Adjourn Lindberg S. Ekola City Planner NOTE TO THE B.O.A.A. MEMBERS: 1. If you have any questions or need additional information on any of the above items, please call Terrie or Aggie on the Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting. 2. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting. TENTATIVE AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION Adjourned Regular Session Shakopee, MN June 9 , 1994 Chairperson Terry Joos Presiding 1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of Agenda 3 . Approval of the May 5, 1994 Meeting Minutes 4 . Recognition by Planning Commission of Interested Citizens. 5 . Approval of Consent Agenda - (All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. ) 6 . 7 : 45 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for a conditional use permit to construct a 150' tall building in a district with a maximum height requirement of 45' , upon the property located at 800 W. 1st Ave. Applicant: Rahr Malting Company Action: Resolution No. 683 7 . 7 : 50 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for the renewal of Mineral Extraction and Land Rehabilitation Conditional Use Permit No. 376, to continue the gravel mining operation upon the property located west of CR 83 , south of CR 16 and north of Valley View Rd. Applicant: Fischer Aggregate, Inc. 8 . 7 : 55 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for a conditional use permit to operate a veterinary clinic and a kennel to board approximately 10 dogs upon the property located at 663 E. CR 72 . Applicant: Gregory T. Miller DVM Action: Resolution No. 686 9 . 8 : 00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider the Preliminary and Final Development Plans for the Scherer South Planned Unit Development, located north of 4th Ave. , south of Hwy. 101 and west of Certainteed. Applicant: Scherer Brothers Lumber 10. 8 : 05 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the preliminary plat for the Scherer South Addition, located north of 4th Ave. , south of Hwy 101 and west of Certainteed. Applicant: Scherer Brothers Lumber 11. 8 : 10 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider the Preliminary Development Plan for the Prairie Bend Planned Unit Development, lying south of East 4th Ave. and south and west of the Knights of Columbus Hall. Applicant: Sienna Corp. 12 . 8 : 15 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider the rezoning of a 7 . 5 acre parcel lying south of Cretex Ave. and north of the RR track from Highway Business (B-i) to Heavy Industrial (I-2) . Applicant: Princess Marble 13 . 8 : 20 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the preliminary and final plat for Monnens Addition, lying on the east side of Market St. , south of 5th Ave. Applicant: Monnens Custom Builders *14 . VACATION: To consider the vacation of the portion of Vierling Dr. between CR 15 and Harrison St. and a portion of Presidential Lane. Applicant: City of Shakopee *15 . VACATION: To consider the vacation of the 20' wide utility easements on two lots at 4401 Valley Industrial Blvd. S. Applicant: Ashland Oil, Inc. *16 . VACATION: To consider the vacation of the 10' wide drainage and utility easements located along the interior lot line of the two vacant lots between Super 8 Motel and Eagle Creek Plaza. Applicant: Murray Williamson & Associates, Inc. 17 . DISCUSSION: Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies. 18 . Other Business A. B. 19 . Adjourn Lindberg S. Ekola City Planner NOTE TO PLANNING MEMBERS: 1. If you have any questions or need additional information on any of the above items, please call Terrie or Aggie on the Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting at 445-3650. 2. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting. # 13 CITY OF SHAKOPEE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT FOR MAY, 1994 Respectfully Submitted David E. Hutton, P.E. Public Works Director PROJECT START COMPLETE STATUS COMMENTS Category I- Projects Under Construction 1. Minibypass 5/93 7/1/94 90% Mn/DOT Project 2. Valley Park 11th 7/93 7/1/94 100% Punch List Items Remaining 3. Upper Valley Drainage 9/93 7/29/94 80% See Narrative Section 4. 1993 Street Reconstruction 8/93 8/1/94 75% See Narrative Section 5. VIP Interceptor 10/93 6/15/94 100% Completed 6. Rahr Forcemain 10/93 6/15/94 95% See Narrative Section 7. Pierce Street 6/94 7/94 0% See Narrative Section 8. Rahr Service Line 5/94 6/15/94 0% Contract Awarded 4/19/94 9. Underground Tank Removal 5/94 6/94 75% See Narrative Section 10. Sidewalk Replacement Project 7/94 9/94 0% Bid Opening in June 11. Public Works Parking Lot 7/94 10/94 0% Bid Opening in June 12. Parking Lot(Pelham) 7/94 10/94 0% Will Bid Work With Downtown Streetscape 13. Downtown Streetscape II 7/94 10/94 0% See Narrative Section 14. Alley- Block 48 7/94 10/94 0% Will Bid Work With Downtown Streetscape 15. Marschall Rd./10th Ave. Sidewalk 7/94 9/94 0% Bid Opening In June 16. 11th Ave. Storm Laterals 6/94 9/94 0% Contract Has Been Awarded 17. Vierling Drive,Adams St. 7/94 9/94 0% Bid Opening In June to Presidential Lane 18. 1st Avenue Sidewalk 7/94 9/94 0% Bid Opening In June Category II- Projects in Design 1. Downtown Alleys 6/93 Done 100% See Narrative Section 2. Tahpah Parking Lot 10/93 Done 100% See Narrative Section Category III- Projects Under Study 1. St. Francis Sewer/Water 7/93 7/94 75% Waiting on Watermain Input from SPUC 2. C.S.A.H. 18 Connection 11/93 7/94 10% 3. C.R. 16 Utilities 2/94 Done 100% 4. Viking Steel Road, et. al. 3/94 Done 100% 5. Murphy's Landing Sewer/Water 3/94 7/94 60% See Narrative Section 6. Pavement Preservation 5/94 6/94 0% See Narrative Section 7. Alley- Block 51 5/94 6/94 50% Category IV - Private Subdivision Construction 1. Beckrich Estates 1992 6/94 95% New Entrance off C.R. 78 Not Completed 2. Meadows 8th 5/93 6/94 85% Finish in 1994 3. Milwaukee Manor 6/93 9/94 100% See Narrative Section 4. Maple Trails 6/93 9/94 25% Finish in 1994 5. Dominion Hills 6/93 9/94 25% Finish in 1994 6. Stonebrooke 2nd Unknown Unknown 0% 1 PROJECT START COMPLETE STATUS COMMENTS Category IV - Private Subdivision Construction (Cont.) 7. Parkview 1st 7/93 8/94 100% Punch List Items Remaining 8. Meadows 9th 10/93 9/94 80% All Gravel Base Completed 9. Westridge Bay 2nd 10/93 9/94 30% Gravel Base Being Placed 10. Homestead Ridge 5/93 8/94 50% All Underground Utilities Completed Category V - Special Projects 1. Maras Street 1990 ??? 90% See Narrative Section 2. In-House Engineering Concept 4/94 7/94 0% Will Prepare with 1995 Budget 3. Prior Lake Outlet Channel 2/93 8/94 0% 4. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan 1992 7/94 95% Draft Plan Completed 5. Comprehensive Stormwater 2/93 7/94 95% Draft Plan Completed Management Plan 6. 5-Year Capital Improvements 4/94 6/94 20% Starting in April Plan 7. Pavement Management System 6/94 9/94 0% See Narrative Section Please refer to the attached narrative section for a more detailed discussion on several of the projects. 2 NARRATIVE SECTION Category 1 - Projects Under Construction 3. Upper Valley Drainage Project - Phase II and Shakopee Bypass Drainage Facilities The mainline ditch is approximately 90% complete. The Contractor is placing topsoil in some areas and seeding. Work in the Tahpah Park area is about 95% complete. The fence has been installed on Field's 3 and 6 and sod has been placed on Field 3. Excavation has begun for the Lions Park Pond and is 75% complete. Restoration work has also begun on areas where only storm sewer pipe was installed. Bike trail construction is has started and is completed from County Road 17 to County Road 79. 4. Street Reconstruction Projects(Spencer Street,8th Avenue, 4th Avenue,Naumkeag Street, Fillmore Street and Atwood Street) All underground utility installations (sewer, water, storm sewer) has been completed on all streets for this project. The base course has been placed on Spencer Street, between 4th Avenue and 8th Avenue and gravel is completed on the remainder of Spencer Street. 8th Avenue is currently being graded and prepared for gravel base, which should be placed in early June. The final wear course of asphalt and yard restoration has been completed on all streets from last year, except for Fillmore Street and Spencer Street between 2nd and 3rd Avenue. These two blocks were paved temporarily last fall, but the Contractor has requested they remain permanent. Staff is currently investigating this request for Council consideration. This project is well ahead of schedule for the August 1, 1994 completion date in the contract. 6. Rahr Forcemain All pipe has been successfully leak tested and this project is essentially completed. The Women's Correctional Facility has received approval to start using this sewer. The Contractor has final restoration and clean up items remaining. 3 7. Pierce Street Public Works crews will remove the existing pavement and regrade the new alley. A City contractor will install the new curb & gutter and pavement. This work should be done in conjunction with an existing contract, so the exact timing for this work is not set at this time. 8. Underground Storage Tank Project The existing unleaded tanks have been removed and the new unleaded and diesel tanks are installed and operational. The Contractor is installing the waste oil tank now and the last part of the project will be to remove the old diesel tank. During the tank removal process, some contaminated soils were found. These soils were contaminated probably from spillage or over filling rather than a leak in the tank. The amount of contaminated soil is very small. The Contractor has retained an environmental engineer to test the soils and work with the City and MPCA for proper disposal. The MPCA has been notified as well as LMCIT. This problem will qualify for Petrofund monies for clean-up. 13. Downtown Streetscape The Downtown Streetscape plans are completed and a bid opening is scheduled for June 23, 1994. Prior to any construction starting, Mn/DOT will need to turnback 1st Avenue to the City. Staff has initiated turnback discussions with Mn/DOT, but they will not be able to do this until after the Minibypass Project is completed (July 1, 1994). Category No. 2 - Projects in Design 1. Downtown Alleys On April 19, 1994 the City Council rejected the lone bid received on this project and directed staff to re-schedule a public hearing on this project. The public hearing will probably be held in late summer, early fall. 2. Tahpah Parking Lot The design is complete. This project will be funded by the Shakopee Jaycees so the actual construction schedule is not determined. 4 Category 3 - Projects Under Study 1. St. Francis Hospital Sewer and Water The sewer portion has been completed and staff is still waiting on the watermain information from Shakopee Public Utilities. The watermain information will be completed by Shakopee Public Utilities Commission's consultant for the June, 1994 Commission meeting. 5. Murphy's Landing Staff has analyzed and located all existing sewer and water facilities, along with individual service lines and is in the process of determining the most effective system to operate for the City. The report should be submitted to Council in June or July. 6. Pavement Preservation Staff is in the process of reviewing all City streets for putting together a 1994 pavement Preservation Project (overlays, seal coating, etc.). Category 4 - Private Subdivisions 3. Milwaukee Manor Dakota Street has been completed (final wear) except for punch list items. Work has not yet been completed on the private streets. Category 5 - Special Projects 1. Maras Street Easements Staff will be requesting permission to do a feasibility report on this project, in order to identify all future right-of-way needs. There are still two remaining properties that have not dedicated the street. 5 2. Total In-House Engineering Concept During the 1994 budget process, the City Council directed staff to prepare a proposal on what it would take to be a completely self-sufficient Engineering Department (i.e. no consultants, staff equipment and furnishings needed). Staff has not prepared this study yet. This report will be prepared in 1994, for the 1995 budget discussion. 3. Improvements to the Prior Lake Outlet Channel Staff met with the PLSL Watershed District in February to discuss the schedule for completing this project and resolving all drainage issues. The Watershed District has not submitted any proposed improvements to this channel, but they have directed their consultant to prepare a study on this. It is anticipated that staff will be working with their consultant to resolve all issues and staff will be bringing this item back to Council. 4. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan (Consultant) The draft report is done. Staff is proposing to submit the final report to all agencies in June. 5. Comprehensive City-Wide Stormwater Management Plan (Consultant) The draft report has been submitted to staff for review. Staff is proposing to submit the final report to all agencies in June. 6. Capital Improvements Program Staff is currently working with the Planning Department to prepare the 5-Year Capital Improvement Program. 7. Pavement Management System The 1994 budget contains $25,000.00 to purchase a Pavement Management System. Staff will be preparing RFP's to solicit bids on this program this summer. 6 #/y Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1633 612 222-8423 SHAKOPEE FORCEMAIN NOTICE OF CONSTRUCTION IN 1994 The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) will be building a new interceptor forcemain along Highway 101 this summer. This project will begin on the north side of Highway 101 near the Americinn Motel and continue to the Peavey Grain Elevator. Near the Peavey Grain Elevator, the forcemain will cross under the highway to the south side and connect to an existing interceptor forcemain near Certain-Teed Roofing Company. This work will not disrupt traffic on Highway 101. Care will be taken to limit construction related inconveniences. When your business has more than one entrance, we will keep at least one of the entrances useable at all times. When we excavate across an existing entrance the contractor will lay the pipe, and fill in the excavation the same day. When there is a single entrance to your property, use of the driveway will be restricted for a few hours. You will be notified in advance of when these disruptions will occur. Actual construction is expected to begin sometime in June 1994. Additional information will be forthcoming when definite schedules are determined. We expect to have work completed by the end of the year. It may be necessary to do some of the landscape restoration in the spring of 1995. If you have questions regarding this project, call Mary Krave, resident engineer at the MWCC Field Office, at 496-0982, or Bill Johnson, MWCC project manager, at 229-2168. Should Mr. Krave and Mr. Johnson not be in when you call, please leave a message on their answering machines or call Pauline Langsdorf, of the MWCC's Communication Office, at 229-2100. Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 23, 1994 The meeting was called to order at 6 :30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, Paulette Risland presiding. Members present : Paulette Risland, Ann Seifert, Steve Johnson, John Tieben, Dolores Lebens, Bob Tomczik, and Paul TenEyck. Staff : Barry Stock and Mark McQuillan. Mr. Stock noted the Park Five Year CIP is not ready for review at this time and requested that it be removed from the agenda. Lebens/Johnson moved to approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried. TenEyck/Johnson moved to approve the April 25, 1994 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meeting minutes as stated. Motion carried. TenEyck/Seifert moved to approve the May 11, 1994 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meeting minutes with an amendment to page two, paragraph nine where it states "4 . Any potential cost for phase I" to be stated as "4 . Any potential cost to phase II . " Motion carried. Bill Schleper of the Shakopee Town Baseball Team appeared before the Board to ask that the City waive the $300 Actvity Fee . He also spoke on behalf of the Legion baseball team and the 35 and Over Baseball team who are being charged $300 as well . Mr. Schleper stated the three teams do not have the financial resources to pay these fees . He noted the baseball teams have donated a considerable amount of volunteer time and funding to make improvements to the baseball stadium in Tahpah Park. Board member Tomczik stated the City is charging other groups who donate time and money. How is it fair to charge certain groups and not charge others? Tomczik stated he did not want to minimize the efforts of the basball teams, but it' s important for the basball community to realize there are cost associated to operating the baseball stadium and users should share some financial responsibility. Exactly what is fair, he did not know. After a lengthy discussion, TenEyck/Lebens moved to recommend to the City Council to amend the city fee schedule for 1994 eliminating the $300 fee for the Town Team, Legion Team and 35 and Over Team, but to develop a new fee structure or formula for 1995 . Motion carried. Johnson/Tomczik moved to recommend to the City Council to offer a resolution to provide matching funds to be at least 50% of the total project cost for the connection of the Minnesota Valley Trail System with the City' s Upper Valley Drainageway Trail System required by the Cooperative Trail Grants Program. Motion carried. Seifert/Johnson moved to table discussion on the draft copy of the Parks and Recreation section of the Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies until the June 13, 1994 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting. Motion carried. Lebens/Johnson moved to recess the meeting until 7 :30 p.m. at which time the Public Hearing for the Community Center proposal will commenced. Motion carried. The meeting recessed at 7 :15 p.m. Chair Risland called the meeting to order at 7 :30 p.m. She opened the Public Hearing by explaining the purpose of the hearing and the grounds rules that will be followed for making a presentation. Assistant City Administrator-Community Service Director Barry Stock gave a brief presentation on the history of community center/facility referendums in Shakopee. Chair Risland opened the "floor" for public comment . Pat Leavitt - 521 1st Ave. Stated he would like the Community Center to have handball/racquetball courts, lap pool, "free" weights and he would vote yes for Phase II . Ione Theis - 1265 Marschall Road. Ione represents the Shakopee Senior Citizens Club that meets at Citizen State bank. She stated the members of her club were surveyed about the community center proposal and the majority of them are in favor of the City spending the TIF funds for that purpose. She feels strongly that many of them would vote yes for Phase II . Ralph Ferry - 8234 Eagle Creek Road. He questions the wisdom of the City duplicating facilities already provided in Chaska and currently under construction at Mystic Lake . He stated if the City does proceed with this project he would hope the facility is not a replica of the aforementioned. He plays racquetball and he would like the HB/RB courts and weight machines put in the center. Theresa Walsh - 120 East 7th Ave . Ms . Walsh stated she is opposed to building a community center and she believes the City has adequate park and recreation facilities to serve the needs of the community. However, later she stated she could support the construction of an Ice Arena. Francis Kreuser - 1033 S . Atwood. Mr. Krieser stated the City Council' s decision to spend TIF money for a community center was a good decision. He noted residents of this community have tried numerous times to get recreation facility referendums passed without much success . He sees this as a great benefit for the youth of the community. He would like to see the center include a leisure pool, ice arena and walking/running track. He would support Phase II . Kris Dirks - 1241 Harrison. would have aerobics studio and daycare center included the center as well as a leisure pool . Don Mertz - 670 Hennes . Mr. Mertz would like to see racquetball courts, gymnasiums, pool and ballfields included in the plans . He stated it was important that the City explained to the citizens exactly what is Tax Increment Funding and how TIF can be used? He pointed out if people understood the real facts regarding these funds, there would be very little opposition to how it' s being used. He would vote yes for a Phase II referendum. At that point, Barry Stock gave a detailed explanation of TIF and what it can and cannot be used for. Mr. Stock emphasized that it' s against State Statutes to have voters decide how the money is to be spent . Chair Risland, resumed the hearing for public comment . Mary Fahnlander - 1137 Van Buren. Ms . Fahnlander was representing the Community Education Advisory Board. She stated the Community Ed Advisory Board feels there is a great need for meeting room space and day care facilities . She is personally in favor of a facility that has a multi-gym for basketball, tennis and aerobics . She would vote yes for Phase II referendum. Gary Gregus - 1069 Van Buren. Mr. Gregus stated he is a teacher and former coach in the Shakopee School District . He believes a community center will benefit people of all ages in the community especially the youth who are looking for places to "hang" out . He sees a great need for an ice arena, gym and senior citizen center. He would vote yes for Phase II . Neil Johnson - 2146 Norton Drive . Mr. Johnson is a high school teacher and coaches varsity basketball and softball . He also is the president of the Shakopee Girls Basketball Association which administers youth basketball programs for girls in grades meet a3-9 . Hee stated there is a dire need for more gym space growing youth basketball program. Even with the new gyms at Sweeney and Pearson schools, they need more available gym time . His organization would like to a gym a part of the center. He would vote yes for Phase II . John Engel - 671 Menke . Mr. Engel stated he has lived in Shakopee all of his life and he has waited for 30 years for the community to build an indoor facility for hockey. He would like a place for his kids to skate . He would vote yes for Phase II . Dave Kaufenberg - 964 S . Clay Street . Mr. Kaufenberg is the president of the Prior-Lake Hockey Association. He stated there is tremendous market for indoor ice time . His program is at a critical stage and needs a permanent place for an expanding program. He would like a ice arena and he would vote yes for Phase II . Irene Sunboom - Irene represents adults with developmental disabilities . She noted that her organization uses the Chaska Community Center' s pool, running track, and gym. For some of her clients, there are limits to what they can use. However, she would like a pool, walking track, and aerobic studio to be included in the center. She would vote for Phase II . Deb Amudson - Ms. Amundson represents the Barracuda Swim Club of Shakopee. Her organization uses the junior high school swimming pool . She would hope a Lap Pool be included with a Leisure Pool to meet the future needs of a competitive swimming program. She is in favor of an ice arena for the community. She would support Phase II . Judi Tomczik - 1232 S . Monroe. Ms . Tomczik felt it was important to get input from the youth in the community. She would vote yes for Phase II . Mike Heitz - 622 S . Adams Street . Favors the construction of an ice arena for hockey and figure skating. In favor of Phase II . Hazel Ecklund 200 Levee Drive. Hazel Ecklund was representing the Senior Citizen Club at 200 Levee Drive. She stated the majority of seniors in her club are in favor of the community center and would support a Phase II referendum. No further comments were presented. Risland thanked those who came forward to speak on this issue and noted the next Public Hearing on the Community Center proposal will be held on Wednesday, June 1, 1994 at 7 : 00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chambers . Johnson/Tieben moved to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried. Johnson/TenEyck moved to adjourn. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 8 :50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Mark McQuillan OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 18, 1994 Chairman Phillips called the meeting to order at 5 :30 p.m. with the following members present : Morke, VanHorn, Unseth, Phillips, Dauenhauer, Miller, and Schoephoerster. Commissioners Albinson, Reinke, Stafford and Brandmire were absent . Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator; Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner; and Paul Bilotta, Senior Planner were also present . Morke/Miller moved to approve the minutes of April 20, 1994 meeting as kept . Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock gave a brief Economic Development Update with reports covering Downtown Phase II, Downtown Riverfront RFP' s, Blocks 3 and 4 prospects, and the Community Center. Discussion then ensued on the possibility of creating an Economic Development Authority. Mr. Stock noted that on May 3, 1994, it was the consensus of the Commission that a special Committee of the Whole meeting be established to discuss the HRA' s involvement in providing housing programs. Mr. Stock noted that the discussion also included the possibility of creating an Economic Development Authority. Mr. Stock noted that in November of 1992, the Shakopee Community Development Commission discussed the possibility of creating an Economic Development Authority or Port Authority. At that time, it was the consensus of the Commission that the status quo be maintained until further information could be obtained to support a change. Mr. Stock noted that with the recent amount of tension being given to housing as a result of Representative Orfield, cities are taking a closer look at the mix of housing being provided in their communities . Mr. Stock stated that Scott County has a Housing and Redevelopment Authority which generally preforms housing type programs in the vast majority of the communities in Scott County. Shakopee is the only community in Scott County with a Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Mr. Stock noted that Prior Lake, Jordan, Belle Plaine and New Prague all have Economic Development Authorities . Mr. Stock stated that the City could create an Economic c Development Authority simply by passing a resolution. Many of the powers presently available to the Shakopee HRA could also be included as powers under the Economic Development Authority. It would also be possible once an Economic Development Authority is established to seek special legislation to request the powers of a Port Authority under the auspices of the Economic Development Authority. Commissioner Unseth stated that he felt the E2A was a more logical route to pursue since Scott County already has an existir_c Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Chairman Phillips questioned what Official Proceedings of the May 18, 1994 Shakopee Community Development Commission Page -2- benefits the City would gain if the HRA were eliminated and the Economic Development Authority was created. Mr. Stock stated that there is very little difference between an Economic Development Authority and a Housing and Redevelopment Authority. An Economic Development Authority can be given more latitude in terms of the powers and duties that Council may wish to subscribe to it . Additionally, the mere indication of housing as part of the HRA indicates that the Authority should be emphasizing housing. Finally, the composition of an EDA in terms of membership is limited to two Councilmembers. Chairman Phillips stated that one of the concepts discussed in 1992 as part of creating an Economic Development Authority was to bring on additional staffing to promote economic development activities . Mr. Stock stated that since 1992 the City has hired additional staff in the Planning Department . He also noted that there does not appear to be unanimous consensus among the Council members with respect to hiring additional staff to promote economic development activities . Commission Miller suggested that the CDC schedule a special meeting to discuss this issue in greater detail . He stated that he felt the Commission should investigate this matter further and provide a firm recommendation to City Council with background and support . It was the consensus of the Commission to schedule a special meeting for Monday June 6th at 6 : 00 p.m. to discuss the possible creation of an Economic Development Authority. Discussion ensued on the Vanpool policy relating to fares for drivers on nine passenger vans. Ms . Sandbeck stated that the City has never established a Vanpool policy relating to the minimum ridership on nine passenger vehicles . Ms. Sandbeck stated that the City does have a policy for twelve and fifteen passenger vans which specifies that minimum ridership shall not fall below nine regular passengers . The City now has two nine passenger vans in the vehicle fleet . Both of these vehicles presently have six regular riders . The question before the Commission is whether or not a policy should be established to implement a fee for drivers who utilize a nine passenger vehicle . The current policy states that Vanpool drivers ride free and receive 150 vehicle miles of personal use . Since the lease cost on nine passenger vehicles is only slightly less than a full size vehicle, the operating cost per vehicle is higher than the other vehicles in the fleet . Ms . Sandbeck stated that the driver of the new nine passenger route that has been established is willing to pay a 50o fare . He also offered to pay a full fare . Ms . Sandbeck noted that the other nine passenger Vanpool driver was notified of the possible change in policy. That individual was unable to attend tonight' s reetinc but did have the opportunity to send a letter expressing his concerns . Commissioner Morke stated that he feels that Vanpool drivers irregardless of Vanpool size should continue to receive a free Official Proceedings of the May 18, 1994 Shakopee Community Development Commission Page -3- ride. He suggested that another alternative would be to eliminate the 150 miles of free personal use. Commissioner Miller stated that perhaps rather than changing the fare for the Vanpool drivers that the other riders in the vehicle should receive a fare increase . Discussion ensued. It was the consensus of the Commission to table this item and have staff investigate what the current MTC fare levels are as compared to the Shakopee Vanpool Program. It was also suggested that an analysis be complete to determine the cost per trip on a nine passenger vehicle versus a fifteen passenger vehicle. Mr. Paul Bilotta handed out the comprehensive plans goals, objectives and policies for the transportation section of the comprehensive plan. He requested the Commission members to review this section and respond back to him with comments within the next two weeks . Discussion ensued on the next regular meeting date. Mr. Stock noted that the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Commission was June 15th. It was suggested that since a special meeting will be held on June 6th that the regular meeting be rescheduled to June 22nd. VanHorn/Miller moved to adjourn the meeting at 7 : 00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. ('I CITY OF SHAKOPEE BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT - MAY 1994 May 1994 May 1993 No. No. Valuation No. No. Valuation Month Y.T.D. Y.T.D. Month Y.T.D. Y.T.D. Single Family-Sewered 14 61 5,486,467 11 56 4, 667,416 Single Family-Septic 5 11 2,284, 089 3 10 1, 088, 158 Multiple Dwellings - 3 882, 404 2 11 1, 543,322 (# Units) (YTD Units) (-) (12) - (4) (26) - Dwelling Additions 28 54 206, 663 16 30 169,738 Other 6 12 831,828 2 3 10,000 New Comm. Bldgs 3 8 1, 110,716 - 1 225, 000 Comm. Bldg. Addns. - 2 250, 000 1 3 159,750 New Industrial-Sewered - - - - - - Ind. Sewered Addns. 1 1 600,000 1 1 2,549, 300 New Industrial-Septic - - - - - - Ind. Septic Addns. - - - - - - Accessory/Garages 6 15 118, 621 5 16 321,722 Signs & Fences 27 50 57,752 16 39 47, 668 Fireplaces/Wood Stoves - 6 12,863 - 2 3,700 Grading/Foundation 2 7 359, 070 - 1 2 ,500 Moving - 1 - - Razing 1 3 11, 150 1 6 70, 313 Remodeling (Res. ) 6 20 114 , 257 1 11 61, 977 Remodeling (Comm/Ind. ) 5 17 1, 333, 600 6 27 1,901, 220 TOTAL 104 271 13 , 659, 480 65 217 12 , 821,784 No. YTD. No. YTD. Electrical 55 200 62 251 Plumbing & Heating 61 261 75 269 Total dwelling units in City after completion of all construction permitted to date 5, 090 CITY OF SHAKOPEE BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IN MAY, 1994 10532 Greystone Const. 230 East 5th Avenue Ramp 4,700 10533 Dean Gillespie 1304 E. 11th Avenue Remodel 3,600 10534 Steve Luegge 1266 Prairie Lane Deck 2,100 10535 Scott Wenisch 1280 Sapphire Lane Deck 1,800 10536 Westside Equip. 500 Gorman Street Tanks 70,000 10537 Donald Bittner 203 West 6th Avenue Fence 1,300 10538 Americinn Motel 1251 East 1st Avenue Storage Shed 200 10539 Edward Rowe 1300 Prairie Lane Remodel 13,680 10540 Dennis Welter 966 Holmes Street Decks 3,878 10541 Robert Roberts 1027 Eastview Circle Fence 400 10542 Kevin Benz 1025 Eastview Circle Fence 400 10543 Ashland Chemical 4401 Valley Ind. Blvd. So. Sign 500 10544 Detail Home Bldrs. 1232 Granite Court House 94,397 L 4 B 2, Heritage Place 4th 10545 Detail Home Bldrs. 2168 Granite Drive House 93,359 L 9 B 3, Heritage Place 3rd 10546 David Yarusso 810 East 1st Avenue Sign 700 10547 Jon Hall 915 Apgar Street Garage 11,600 10548 James Jaggars 440 East 4th Avenue Fence 530 10549 Timothy Meek 753 Lupine Court Deck 2,000 10550 Randall Gregor 1118 Prairie Court Deck 1,960 10551 Richard Siebenbruner 1251 Sapphire Lane Deck 1,300 10552 John Sexton 1242 Miller Street House 138,000 L 11 B 2, Parkview 1st 10553 Rich Logeais 1255 Miller Street House 79,400 L 13 B 1, Parkview 1st 10554 Keith Theis 235 West 6th Avenue Fence 200 10555 Westridge Bay Co. 983 County Road 14 Demo 4,150 10556 MacDonald Home Imprv. 476 Hampton Circle House 149,000 L 4 B 4, Beckrich Park Estates 10557 Novak Fleck 1427 Thistle Lane House 77,000 L 11 B 3, Meadows 9th 10558 Tony Sadat 1885 West 3rd Avenue Mini-Storage 263,716 10559 Ries Builders 1017 Swift Street Stairs 1,300 10560 Conklin Company 551 Valley Park Drive Remodel 51,600 10561 Gregory Hanninen 2263 Horizon Circle Porch/Deck 7,500 10562 G. F. Juergens 110 East 1st Avenue Remodel 8,000 10563 Novak Fleck 1407 Thistle Lane House 82,719 L 12 B 3, Meadows 9th 10564 Steve Annen 1181 Naumkeag Street Deck 2,408 10565 Construction 70 901 Canterbury Road Alteration 644,000 10566 Dennis Duff 1042 Ramsey Street Garage 5,000 10567 Bruce Douglas 1342 Sage Lane Fence 1,075 10568 Michael Dropps 1104 Polk Street Fence 2,000 10569 Ian Gamble 406 Minnesota Street Fence 600 10570 Jerome Jenny 603 Barrington Drive Deck 3,178 10571 Greystone Construction 200 East 10th Avenue Grading 296,670 10572 Greystone Construction 200 East 10th Avenue Grandstand 285,000 10573 Cornerstone Const. 2008 Granite Drive Deck 2,500 10574 Amy Flood 1121 Minnesota Court Deck 3,024 10575 David Scharpen 1113 Polk Street Remodel 9,400 10576 Deanna Lemke 505 West 7th Avenue Fence 250 10577 Kevin Karvonen 917 Goldenrod Lane Fence 75 10578 Meadow Wood Builders 3014 Marcia Lane House 170,000 L 3 B 1, Weinandt Acres 2nd 10579 Shakopee Valley Printing 5101 Valley Ind. Blvd. So. Addition 600,000 10580 Charles O'Brian 937 Aster Lane Fence 1,500 10581 Wally Malinski 1932 Norton Drive Deck/Fence 2,300 10582 Trevor Lundgren 1269 Ruby Lane Fence 1,000 10583 Ron Aanerud 694 Londonderry Cove Deck 4,529 10584 Rahr Malting 800 West 1st Avenue Metal Cladding 155,000 10585 John Soucek 7800 Horizon Drive Deck 1,898 10586 Kevin Bergs 1173 Shawmut Street Deck 1,372 10587 Douglas Cuihane 2124 Bridge Spur Storage Bldg. 1,485 10588 Randall Sovell 1045 E. Shakopee Avenue Fence 150 10589 Mike Allison 1362 Thistle Lane Deck 1,568 10590 Charles Rust 1294 Limestone Drive Addition 48,000 10591 Kenneth Kewatt 328 East 3rd Avenue Remodel 12,696 10592 Barbara Breuer 208 Arwood Street Garage 3,600 10593 Brigitte O'Leary 406 East 2nd Avenue Deck 300 786 Barrington Drive House 235,014 10594 G. F. Juergens L 6 B 5, Beckrich Park Estates 10595 Michael Reynolds 1124 Madison Street Deck 1,456 10596 Valley Paving East 13th Avenue Grading 25,700 10597 Keith Clemens 4751 Eagle Creek Blvd. Fence 1,575 10598 Randy Gregor 1118 Prairie Court Fence 700 10599 Tammy Mason 735 Sommerville Street Fence 2,500 10600 Detail Home Bldrs. 2185 Granite Drive House 94,500 L 8 B 3, Heritage Place 3rd 10601 Richard Rodenberg 706 West 7th Avenue Porch 6,000 10602 Dale Tiedeken 1540 Roundhouse Circle Fence 330 10603 Tad Angell 2621 Emerald Lane Fence 1,000 10604 M. W. Johnson Const. 683 Barrington Drive House 143,188 L 1 B 3, Beckrich Park Estates 10605 Richmar Construction Westridge Lake Estates Pumphouse 38,000 10606 Novak Fleck 1317 Thistle Lane House 79,038 L 3 B 3, Meadows 8th 10607 Tyler Crosby 1201 Vierling Court Deck 1,000 10608 Jairam Algoo 4087 C. R. 79 House 284,000 L 1 B 1, Kubes 2nd Addition 10609 Novak Fleck 1422 Sage Lane House 87,968 L 4 B 5, Meadows 9th 10610 Rick Sames 1109 Minnesota Court Deck 2,300 10611 Ross Ragan 1192 Tyler Street Roof 500 10612 Randal Sauer 9401 Boiling Springs Ln. Deck 2,240 10613 Cecil Clay 1895 Eagle Creek Blvd. Mini-Storage 15,000 10614 Kent Heitkamp 1071 Eastview Circle Fence 500 10615 Dennis Krampotich 979 Goldenrod Lane Deck 2,350 10616 American Red Cross 222 So. Leiws Street Remodel 3,000 10617 Valleyfair One Valleyfair Drive Addition 20,000 10618 Dave Anton 1908 Granite Drive Deck 1,800 10619 Margaret Zupfer 1239 Ruby Lane Fence 100 10620 City of Shakopee 1124 E. 2nd Avenue House 27,351 L 8 B 29, East Shakopee 10621 Dan Malinowski 1091 E. Shakopee Avenue Fence 1,500 10622 Keith Hartman 1312 E. 11th Avenue Fence 1,500 10623 Laurie Zimmerman 2460 Marschall Road Fence 500 1:624 Joe Young 1122 Prairie Court Fence 600 10625 Detail Home Bldrs. 1118 Heritage Drive E. House L 1 B 1, Heritage Place 3rd 100,965 10626 Ace Signs Inc. 444 East 1st Avenue Signs 9,953 10627 Greg Arnold 1349 Thistle Lane Deck 1,568 10628 Hoyt Construction 966 Holmes Street Windows 4,900 10629 John Parrish 1275 Miller Street Deck 2,240 10630 Tim Johnson 1423 Sage Court Deck 1,568 10631 Shirley Rein 735 Holmes Street Garage 10,000 10632 High Five Erectors 700 Canterbury Road Storage Bldg. 55,000 10633 Rich Logeais 1547 Thistle Lane House 79,400 L 8 B 3, Meadows 9th 10634 Rich Logeais 1671 Primrose Lane House 79,299 L 5 B 4, Meadows 9th 10635 BMS Inc. 1277 Swift Circle House 100,000 L 7 B 2, Parkview 1st Total: $4,957,670 # 1S MEMO TO: Shakopee City Council FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Stans Project Update DATE: June 1, 1994 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Plans continue to move forward in relocating the home located at 135 West Third Avenue to the new site. Several problems were encountered with the building mover in preparing the home site for the move. Additional problems were encountered in terms of coordinating the various utility companies who have to disconnect lines during the move. The home is scheduled to be relocated prior to June 13th. Note that a special HRA meeting is being proposed for June 21, 1994 . At that time, I will present the following: 1 . Price quotations for Phase III improvements on the home site . 2 . Options for the HRA to consider in terms of utilizing the home for transitional housing and/or disposing of the property. Monthly Project Report - Submitted by Barry Stock June 3, 1994 Project Start Complete Status Comments 1. Clinic RFP's ? ? 0% 2 . AWAIR Program ? ? 0% 3 . Perform Employee 5/1 5/15 0% Evaluations 4. City Hall Union Contr. 10/15 4/1 95% 5 Develop Pay for Perf. DRK to Program 4/1 7/1 10% complete 6. Complete Dept. Reorganization Plan 3/1 6/1 25% 7 . City Newsletter 1/1 4/1 100% First Issue Development scheduled for May 8 . TIF Plan Amendments 12/15 5/5 100% 9. Stan House Project 2/15 8/1 20% 10. Downtown Utlility 3/24 ? 5% On hold until Easements after new Public Hearing 11. 1994 Pool Repairs 4/1 6/10 80% ADA Restroom 12. 1994 Clean up Day 4/1 4/30 100% 13 . Solicit Downtown 4/11 7/1 75% Development Interest 14. City Residents Guide 4/15 7/1 25% 15. Complete CIP 5/20 6/20 75% (Parks & Gov't Bldgs) 16. Evaluate creation of 6/1 7/15 10% an Econ. Dev. Auth. 17. Select Comm Center 5/20 6/21 50% Const. Mgr. 18. Hold Rec. Pub. 5/23 6/1 100% Hearings on Comm. Center 19. Determine Phase I Comm. 6/13 7/15 0% Center Facilities c ot( yLcLL 4 ,,r ac Lqj/ mevruv; 0(, 1 , lam' doi-2L6 Lei:L 44S-Iir2i) deiti:iyvy) L-o 00-72),& „ , rt14--6 ate. n d � -PCL& 14/1_) ZOGIO`L / eZ/lIV jeCirt46607t A6/0 CLAV1611"0Tizdr /6fl' ” '16A/7Z° 41"netAlin4 jr7v MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator SUBJECT: Annexation Agreement With Jackson Township DATE: June 3 , 1994 The City Attorney has prepared a new orderly annexation resolution and agreement with Jackson Township. Copies are being sent to the township. The city has not yet received the waivers from the property owners in the P & V Additions. Rose Menke has the waivers and will be delivering them to the City on Monday. She has indicated that there are four property owners who have not signed the waivers: Minnegasco, State of Minn. , Boyd, and Marnoff. Both Boyd and Marnoff are non-resident land owners. When the City receives the waivers, staff will be checking if they are all there and if they are signed and notarized properly so they can be recorded. Hopefully this can be accomplished by the June 21st Council meeting so that City Council can take appropriate actions at that time. MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Additional Information on Proposed Community Center/TIF DATE: June 3 , 1994 In response to comments being heard in the community, additional information received on Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and it' s relationship to the community center, and some misinformation being circulated, the following is being sent to Councilmembers for information purposes only. Attachment #1 is a memo which was sent to Representative Becky Kelso from Joel Michael, Legislative Analyst with the Research Department of the Minnesota House of Representatives . This memo provides information and commentary on possible uses of so called TIF surplus funds . (In the past, Joel Michael was clearly identified as an opponent of TIF. ) In summary, this memo indicates that the City can legally use TIF for the financing of a community center. This is something we were aware of . This also indicates that there are other uses that can be made of TIF funds but that general purpose governmental buildings such as city halls and fire stations cannot be funded with TIF funds . The memo goes on to say that the City could defease the outstanding TIF bonds and decertify tax increment districts. We are also well aware that we could do this if we so desired. If this were to happen, tax relief would occur including not only Scott County and I .S.D. 720 but also every fiscal disparities sharing entity in the seven county metro area and also the State of Minnesota. In essence, instead of the City of Shakopee keeping 100% of the increment from the TIF Districts the City would initially contribute 40% of it to the fiscal disparities pool with the remaining 60% would be spread over the other local taxing jurisdictions . This would then result in relief for the State of Minnesota because it appears as though they would reduce school aide to the Shakopee School District and, apparently also cut local governmental aid to both the City of Shakopee and Scott County in the future. Another option cited in the memo would allow the City to distribute excess increments to the City, County and School District . The Michael memo indicates that this would have essentially the same impact as early decertification but that it would also provide immediate tax relief . My reading of the statute, Minnesota Statutes 469 . 176 Subd. 2 (attachment 2) leads me to believe that there would be a reduction in school and city taxes the following year, not immediately. Furthermore Section 4 of Subd. 2 indicates that after the money is given to the school district the county auditor must report this to the Commissioner of Education within 30 days of the distribution. I do not have the information from the Department of Education relative to what will happen here but it would appear likely that school aid would then be reduced to I .S.D. 720 . In other words, if this scenario was correct, the city would be using TIF in order to provide financial relief to the State of Minnesota. Paragraph b of Subd. 2 then goes on to say that the amounts distributed to the city and county would then be deducted from the levy limits of the governmental units the following year. This is relevant only if the state were to reinitiate levy limits . This of course continues to remain a possibility and both the city and the county could be in a very unfortunate situation of having artificially low levy limits and then having to live with them for a number of years . Paragraph b then goes on to say that the amounts deducted would be treated as local governmental aid payments . Again, it appears likely that the State of Minnesota would treat these returned tax increment revenues as a substitute for local governmental aid to both the City of Shakopee and Scott County. If this scenario is correct, the City would be using TIF for the purpose of providing relief to the State of Minnesota. Attachment #3 is a memo which was given to the City Council earlier relates to the use of TIF and the need for a referendum for a community center for the City of Maplewood. This memo specifically states that before the City can hold a referendum there must be legal authorization for such referendum. The memo further states that there is no specific statutory authority to allow a referendum for a community center. It further states that there is no authority under statute to submit a TIF plan to a referendum. A TIF plan, according to the applicable State Statutes, requires a public hearing before adoption but not a public vote. It is my understanding that the City of Maplewood is using a substantial amount of TIF revenues for it' s community center, which is currently under construction, and that they have also sold G.O. Bonds without holding a referendum for this facility. Attachment #3 is an attorneys opinion (not an Attorney General' s opinion) , however the City of Maplewood is going forth based upon this and other opinions they have received relative to the lack of a need for a referendum for their community center. If City Councilmembers have questions about this or other aspects of the use of TIF in the community center please do not hesitate to contact me. A4161,644.14 ( Research Department Minnesota House of Thomas Todd, Director 600 State Office Building _. Representatives St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-1201 (612) 296-6753 [FAX 296-98871 May 27, 1994 TO: Representative Becky Kelso FRO : Joel Michael, Legislative Analyst RE: Shakopee TIF Options This memo is to follow-up on your request regarding the options the city of Shakopee has to use surplus increments from one or more of its tax increment financing (TIF) districts. First of all, as I indicated to you on the phone, the city's proposed use of the money to construct a community center is probably a valid use of the increments. The law prohibits the use of tax increments for "a building to be used primarily and regularly for conducting the business of a municipality, county, school district, or any other local unit of government." Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subd. 4g (1993 Supp.). However, this prohibition would not apply to a community center and, in fact, the law contains an exception designed specifically to cover such buildings. It provides that increments may be used for "a facility used for social, recreational, or conference purposes and not primarily for conducting the business of the municipality." Id. Second, the city could use the surplus increments to pay off (defease) the outstanding bonds and to decertify the relevant tax increment district(s) early. This would have several effects once the TIF district is decertified: • Tax relief would be provided to the property taxpayers by spreading the city levy, the county levy, the school's unequalized levies, and special district levies over a broader tax base (the TIF captured value). This would benefit taxpayers in the affected taxing districts. • The state's contribution to the local school district would drop to offset the increase in tax base for the portion of the school's levy that is derived from equalized levies (general education, transportation, etc.). • If the district is a pre-1979 housing and redevelopment district (i.e., one that is not required to make a fiscal disparities contribution) and it contains commercial / Research Department May 27, 1994 Minnesota House of Representatives Page 2 and industrial property, the fiscal disparities contribution would rise. This would provide property tax relief (or additional property tax base) across the entire seven county metropolitan area. • If the school district has a referendum levy that is rate based and for which it is not receiving the full tax revenue from the portion imposed on the TIF captured value, the school would receive additional revenue. Third, the city could elect to distribute the tax increments as excess increments under section 469.176, subdivision 2 to the city, county, and school district. This would have essentially the same affect as early decertification with a couple of important differences. • The tax relief would be provided immediately, rather than waiting until the TIF district is decertified. • The fiscal disparities contribution would not increase. Thus, more tax relief could be provided to local taxpayers. • Special taxing districts would not share in the distributions of excess increments. There is some legal question whether section 469.176, subdivision 2 distributions can be made by a pre-1979 district. However, I know other cities (such as Minneapolis) have done so. Fourth, the city could spend the money on other qualifying activities. These activities include public infrastructure projects, such as street, sidewalk, sewer, and water improvements, located in the tax increment financing project area. If these are activities that the city had otherwise intended to finance with general fund money or out of a future bond issue, this could reduce future city property taxes or lower special assessments in parts of the city. I hope this is helpful. If I can be of additional assistance, please let me know (6-5057). JM/fa L. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT § 469.176 1 ;CONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 y 469.175,. subdivision 1,paragraph(b),to defer receiptpf t i the firsncrement; or(2)the period '•1 pions 2 and 3, the full faith and = necessary:to recover the costs of removal actions or remedial actions specified in a develop 1 y are pledged to the payment of ment response action plan. . . as been paid in full. Subd. 1f.--.Delinquent taxes after termination: . If a'parcel located in the district has o tax increment shall be paid to delinquent property taxes when the district terminates under the duration limits,the payment i three years from the date of of the parcel's delinquent taxes made after decertification of the district are tax increments to al property in the district by the the extent the nonpayment of property taxes caused the outstanding bonds or contractual Is have been issued in aid of the obligations pledged to be paid by the district to be paid by sources other than tax increments )r any other law, except revenue or to go unpaid. The county auditor shall pay the appropriate amount to the district The (2) the authority has acquired authority shall provide the county auditor with information regarding the payment of icted or caused to be constructed outstanding bonds or contractual obligations and any other information necessary to adminis- ter the payment, as requested by the county auditor. ent shall in any event be paid Subd.2. Excess tax increments. (a) In any year in which the tax increment exceeds the amount necessary to pay the costs authorized by the tax increment financing plan, including : of the first tax increment for a the amount necessary to cancel any tax levy as provided in section 475.61, subdivision 3,the i authority shall use the excess amount to do any of the following: (1) prepay any outstanding first increment fora renewal and bonds, (2) discharge the pledge of tax increment therefor, (3) pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of such bond, or (4)return the excess amount to the county auditor ; j who shall distribute the excess amount to the municipality, county, and school district in inaneing plan for a soils condition which the tax increment financing district is located in direct proportion to their respective f Tical tax rates. The county auditor must re ort to the commissioner of education the amount PP 1 years from approval p roval of the tax of any excess tax increment distribute to a s ooFdistnct within 30 days of the distribution. i tic development district, ` (b) The amounts_-distributed to a city or county must be deducted from the levy limits of ar 20 years from the date of receipt the governmen-taT unit foirthe_following year. _Tn calculating the levy limit base for later ority pursuant to section 469.175, years, the amount deducted must be treated as a Vocal government aid payment rider section 469.175, subdivision 1, Subd. 3. Limitation on administrative expenses. (a) For districts for which certifica- he authority of the first increment tion was requested before August 1, 1979, or after June 30, 1982, no tax increment shall be r this subdivision or subdivision le used to pay any administrative expenses for a project which exceed ten percent of the total j is from taxes payable in the year in tax increment expenditures authorized by the tax increment financing plan or the total tax :. This paragraph does not affect a increment expenditures for the project, whichever is less. ne tax increment financing plan or (b) For districts for which certification was requested after July 31, 1979, and before July ler subdivision lc. This paragraph 1, 1982, no tax increment shall be used to pay administrative expenses, as defined in elinquent taxes in subdivision lf. Minnesota Statutes 1980, section 273.73, for a project which exceeds five percent of the total ,, r tax increment financing districts tax increment expenditures authorized by the tax increment financing plan or the total tax a paid to the authority after April 1, increment expenditures for the project, whichever is less: standing on April 1, 1990,secured by Subd. 4. Limitation on use of tax increment; general rule. All revenues derived from time is greater, provided that in no tax increment shall be used in accordance with the tax increment financing plan. The fust 1,2009,from such a district. If revenues shall be used solely for the following purposes: (1) to pay the principal of and 2001,because bonds were outstand- interest on bonds issued to finance a project; (2) by a rural development financing authority Ail 1,2001,the following restrictions for the purposes stated in section 469.142, by a port authority or municipality exercising the expended after April 1,2001, except powers of a port authority to finance or otherwise pay the cost of redevelopment pursuant to i, or (ii) bonds issued to refund the sections 469.048 to 469.068,by an economic development authority to finance or otherwise pay ssuance costs, provided the average the cost of redevelopment pursuant to sections 469.090 to 469.108, by a housing and rnds refunded. redevelopment authority or economic development authority to finance or otherwise pay is. Modification of a tax increment public redevelopment costs pursuant to sections 469.001 to 469.047, by a municipality or economic i 4, shall not extend the durational costs of a development evel development t districpursuant to sections 469.124 to 469.134, by a municipality or ;ubdistricts. If a parcel of a district authority to finance or otherwise pay the costs of developing and implementing a development hazardous substance subdistrict, tac action response plan, by a municipality or redevelopment agency to finance or otherwise pay otherwise Premiums for insurance or other security guaranteeing the payment when due of principal of for longer than the periodand interest on the bonds pursuant to chapter 462C,sections 469.152 to 469.165,or both,or to et The extended period for collection cp that accumulate and maintain a reserve securing the payment when due of the principal of and :el tax increment from the parcel motion interest on the bonds pursuant to chapter 462C, sections 469.152 to 469.165, or both, which .el before the date of the certifi on revenues in the reserve shall not exceed, subsequent to the fifth anniversary of the date of received after the date of (b).certification issue of the first bond issue secured by the reserve, an amount equal to 20 percent of the subdivision 7, paragraph om (b) of aggregate principal amount of the outstandingand nondefeased bonds secured by the P P ,sser of: (1) 25 years from the date on reserve. if the authority elects under sech 219 1 05-16-1994 14:35 612 770 4506 Cita of MaPlewood P.01 CITY OF pL E wo op ,440,4144g 1880 E. rnTiNTY KAP B MAPLEWWU,MIN NES(r1'A 55109 (612) 770-4500 FAX is (612) 770-4506 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM TO DCInnce FROM G`'tttiwn WA, FAX 1 445 • 614 DATE i kit 16 19°14 NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET ELME Con. CK n10010 r1: rt,lrcndwn 111Y-16-1994 14:37 612 770 4506 92% P.01 MEMO PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDElsin L To: Michael McGuire, City Manager From: Patrick J. Kelly, Co-City Attorney Date: January 14, 1991 Re: Referendum on Comfy Canter The term "referendum" is defined as a process of referring to the electorate for the approval of a law passed by the elected officials. Typically, there must be a legal authorization for a referendum. Statutory cities must find specific authority for special election. See, 1961 A.G.Op. to the Village of Maplewood. Questions considered in a special election must be authorized by law or local charter. M.S.A. 205.10. The City may not hold a special election to advise the council on question of public policy unless a charter authorizes these types s f elections. Statutes which permit referendums include: 1) Creation of park districts, 398.20; 2) Discontinuing municipal liquor stores, 340353; 3) Municipal civil service merit systems, 44.02; 4) Lake improvement districts, 378.47; 5) Retirement fund/social security coverage, 6) Cooperative electric associations 216B.027; 7) Annexation of territory 103B.575 8) Hazardous waste facilities, 115A.191; 9) School tax levies, 124B.03; There is no specific statutory authority which allows a referendum on the question of a community center. Therefore, allowing such a referendum would be illegal, non-binding and nonenforceabls. However, the use of tax increment financing is governed by M.S.A.§469.174, et al. The term "redevelopment district" is defined in subdivision 10. There is no authority under statute to submit a TIF plan to a referendum. A TIF plan is adopted pursuant to M.S.A. §469.175, Subd. 3 which essentially calls for a public hearing, but not a public vote. The only provision for a referendum under the economic development chapter can be found at M.S,A. §469.1(17. However, this only applies to a tax levy imposed by an economic development authority. That is not applicable to the facts concerning the Maplewood Community Center financing, PJK MAY-16-1994 14:38 612 770 4506 92% P.02 Memo to: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator From: Mark McQuillan, Recreation Supervisor Re : Public Hearing to Redevelop Huber Park - Non Agenda Informational Date: June 7, 1994 INTRODUCTION Staff is applying for an Outdoor Recreation Grant (LAWCON) to assist in the redevelopment cost of Huber Park. The Outdoor Recreation Grant is administered by the Department of Natural Resources . The goal of the program is to assist communities in acquiring, developing and/or redeveloping facilities for outdoor use . Outdoor Recreation Grants can fund up to 50% (maximum of $50, 000) of the total project cost . The remaining 50% "the local share" can consist of local funding, materials, labor and equipment usage through the local sponsor or through local donations or combination thereof . Grant applications are due August 1, 1994 . One of the requirements of the grant application is that a Public Hearing be held on the proposed plan. A Public Hearing will be held at the June 27, 1994 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meeting. TENTATIVE AGENDA REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JUNE 7, 1994 LOCATION: City Hall, 129 Holmes Street South Mayor Gary Laurent presiding 1] Roll Call at 7 : 00 p.m. 2] Approval of Agenda 3] Recess for H.R.A. Meeting 4] Re-convene 5] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 6] Mayor's Report 7] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 8] Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. ) 9] Approve Minutes of May 3rd and May 17th, 1994 10] Communications: a] Recognition of Citizens b] D.P. Watzl, Sporting Arms, regarding Pawn Shop Ordinance c] Shakopee Jaycees, regarding rental space 11] PUBLIC HEARINGS: a] 7: 00 p.m. Public Hearing on the vacation of Jasper Road between CR-16 and Hauer Trail b] 7 : 00 p.m. Public Hearing on Land Use Regulations (Zoning) Ordinance No. 377 (Bring copy received 5/17) c] 7 : 30 p.m. Public Hearing on the proposed improvements to CR-15 between 6th and 13th Avenues - Res. 4013 12) Recommendations from Boards and Commissions: Park and Recreation Advisory Board: *a] Fees For Adult Baseball Teams - Res. No. 4018 *b] Cooperative Trail Grant - Res. No. 4019 TENTATIVE AGENDA June 7, 1994 Page -2- 13] Reports from Staff: a] Sidewalks at 8th and Spencer - Res. No. 4015 *b] Pawnshop and Pawnbroker's Licenses *c] Stop Sign Study at 7th Avenue and Dakota Street *d] Hiring of Assistant City Attorney *e] Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Prairie Bend Planned Unit Development (PUD) - Res. No. 4020 *f] Request for Extension of Time to Record the Final Plat for Dominion Hills 1st Addition *g] Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan h] Alley Problem *i] Temporary 3 . 2 Beer License - St. Mary's Church *j ] Approve Bills in the Amount of $263 , 341. 36 *k] Sander Replacement for Public Works 1] 1993 Street Reconstruction Project - memo on table m] Salary Adjustments 14) Resolutions and Ordinances: *a] Res. No. 4007 - Receiving A Report and Setting Hearing on Improvement to Viking Steel Road From CR-16 to TH-101, Project 1994-10 *b] Res. No. 4016 - Ordering Report for Improvements to Maras Street From 13th Avenue South *c] Res. No. 4014 - Receiving A Report and Setting Hearing on Improvements to CR-16 From CR-17 to CR-83, Project No. 1994-11 *d] Res. No. 4017 - Met Council Water Quality Grants 15] Other Business: a] b] c] 16] Adjourn to Tuesday, June 21, 1994 at 7 : 00 p.m. Dennis R. Kraft City Administrator TENTATIVE AGENEA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOP E, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting June 7, 1994 1 . Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M. 2 . Approval of Minutes for April 19, and May 3 , 1994 3 . Other Business - a) b) 4 . Adjourn to Tuesday, June 21, 1994 at 7 : 00 P.M. Dennis R. Kraft Executive Director OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APRIL 19, 1994 Chrmn. Lynch called the meeting to order at 7 : 08 PM with Comm. Beard, Dirks, Sweeney and Mayor Laurent present. Also present: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator; Barry Stock, Asst City Administrator; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; Karen Marty, City Attorney; Dave Hutton, Public Works Director, and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk. Beard/Laurent moved to approve the April 5, 1994 Minutes. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kraft explained that the HRA has closed on the property for the Stans Project. Mr. Kraft explained Phase I and Phase II and what the bids entailed. He commented that the HRA only received one bid back from the contractors and it was within the projected budget. Mr. Stock explained that lead paint samples from the exterior of the house were sent in to be tested but no results have come back at this time. He explained that many bids did not come back due to the way it was bid out and the contractors believed this could be a messy project since the house was being moved. Sweeney/Beard moved to accept the phase one and phase two price quotations submitted by Dave Schmitt Construction for the Stans house relocation project. ($7, 945 and $19, 406 respectively) Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock informed the HRA that he has been in contact with the CAP Agency to discuss transitional housing and other ideas for the Stans house. Mr. Kraft explained the request by Randy Sampson, Canterbury Park Holding Company, to discontinue the requirement for a letter of credit to guarantee payment of property taxes for Canterbury Downs and accept a personal guarantee by Curtis Sampson. Mr. Kraft explained the financial situation of Curtis Sampson and stated that his assets were well in excess of the property tax due to the City of Shakopee and would recommend the HRA grant the request by Randy Sampson. Ms. Marty requested that Mr. Tom Hay, bond counsel, also review the documents since he drafted the original documents with Canterbury Downs. Mr. Kraft informed Council that Mr. Irwin Jacobs has to be out from under the letter of credit by May 1 and there is not a council meeting until May 3 . Laurent/Dirks moved to direct the appropriate HRA officials to modify the agreement with Canterbury Park Holding Co. and Curtis Sampson which will substitute a personal guarantee for a letter of Official Proceedings of the April 19 , 1994 Shakopee H.R.A. Page -2- credit for the payment of taxes on Canterbury Downs Racetrack for years 1994 and 1995. Cncl. Sweeney commented that while a letter of credit was required from Mr. Jacobs, he did not request an alternative to the letter of credit. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock stated that on the property where the HRA will be relocating the Stans project there is a garage and staff would request the HRA to declare this garage surplus property and dispose of it. Laurent/Sweeney moved to declare the garage on said property (1124 East 2nd Avenue) be surplus property and direct staff to sell it for a reasonable amount. Motion carried unanimously. Chrmn. Lynch adjourned the HRA meeting at 7: 30 p.m. ,14 Dennis R. Kraft Executive Director Debra Zabel Recording Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 3, 1994 Chrmn. Lynch called the meeting zo order at 7 : 04 p.m. with Mayor Laurent and Commissioners Dirks, Sweeney, and Beard present . Also present : Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator; Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator; Karen Marty, City Attorney; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; and David Hutton, Public Works Director. Barry Stock gave a brief summary regarding this matter. He stated that earlier this year the HRA suggested that the Community Development Commission investigate possible housing programs to implement in our community. In April, 1994 , this issue was discussed and it was suggested that a housing needs assessment be conducted by an outside source to determine where the exact need is in terms of housing assistance . Mr. Stock also stated that there are a number of housing assistance programs that could be pursued by the Shakopee HRA. In the past, the Shakopee HRA has pursued commercial and industrial economic development types of projects. He spoke with Bill Jaffa, Executive Director for the Scott County HRA regarding this matter and Mr. Jaffa stated a need for housing assistance in the area of transitional housing. The Shakopee Community Development Commission is recommending that the Shakopee HRA pursue a housing needs analysis with costs to be split equally between the Shakopee and Scott County HRA. Staff is recommending to work with the Scott County HRA to complete a housing needs assessment of the Scott County area with our funding share not to exceed $10, 000 . Discussion followed. There was a brief discussion regarding the roles of the HRA. Chairperson Lynch suggested that a Committee of the Whole meeting to discuss this issue further and that the establishment of an Economic Development Authority be discussed. Beard/Laurent offered a motion that the HRA not undertake a housing needs assessment at this time due to lack of information. Motion carried unanimously. Barry Stock gave a brief summary regarding the Stans House Relocation. Staff is seeking direction from the HRA in regards to whether or not the garage on this property should be removed or demolished. If the HRA wishes to proceed with moving the current garage from its present site it would cost approximately $3, 500 . If the HRA wishes to not provide for a garage at the new house site, the HRA could incur cost savings in the range of $5, 000 . On the other hand, if the HRA chooses to build an entirely new garage at the proposed housing site, it would only cost about $1, 000 more than what has been budgeted for the garage relocation and improvements. Sweeney/Beard offered a motion to move to declare the existing garage (at the Stans house site) surplus property and direct the Executive Director of the HRA to dispcse of it accordingly. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Beard offered a motion to direct staff to spend time on something other than garages because we don' t want to build a garage at this time . Motion carried unanimously. Chrmn. Lynch adjourned the meeting at 7 : 25 p.m. Dennis R. Kraft Executive Director Lisa Anderson Red Laing Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 3, 1994 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 7 : 03 p.m. with Councilmembers Lynch, Dirks, Beard & Sweeney present . Also present : Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator; Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator; Karen Marty, City Attorney; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; and David Hutton, Public Works Director. Lynch/Beard moved to approve the agenda. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent recessed the City Council meeting at 7 : 04 p.m. for a meeting of the HRA. Mayor Laurent reconvened the City Council meeting at 7 :25 p.m. Liaison reports were given by the Councilmembers . Mayor Laurent gave the Mayor' s Report . Mayor Laurent asked if anyone present in the audience wished to speak on any item not on the agenda. Mr. Mike Stephens, 823 East Bluff Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the podium. He stated that he was at the meeting to complain about the noise from Springers on Main. He stated that the base sound is too loud and keeps him awake at night . Mr. Stephens stated he has spoken with the manager who indicated he is doing some insulating. Mr. Stephens stated that the problem still has not improved. A brief discussion was had regarding the current zoning ordinance . The City Attorney stated that the City Council has a few options . They could wait until the new ordinance is in place or could also direct staff to get the owner to agree, and staff could bring Springers on Main before the City Council to discuss if a license should be suspended for creating a public nuisance . The City Council agreed to inform Springers on Main that the zoning ordinance is being updated and that they will be in violation of it if they don' t do something regarding the noise problem. Councilmembers removed from the consent agenda : 13b) Eagle Creek Thrift Shop Watermain; 13d] Downtown Riverfront Plan and, 11e] Homestead Ridge First Addition Park Dedication. Councilmembers added to the consent agenda : 13k) National Public Works Week. Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve the consent business as modified. Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Laurent abstaining from 13h] Stonebrcoke of Shakopee, Inc . Wine License . Official Proceedings of the May 3 , 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -2- Sweeney/Dirks moved to accept the resignation of Mr. Joe Kelly from the Planning Commission with regrets . (Motion carried under consent business . ) A brief discussion was held regarding restrictive parking. Mayor Laurent stated restricted parking was requested on the west side of Holmes Street for County employees Cncl . Sweeney stated that it would be unwise for the City Council to begin a program of setting up restricted parking. The suggestion was made that Courthouse employees park a couple blocks from the Courthouse to leave spaces available for people who need to do business at the Courthouse. Beard/Sweeney moved to direct staff to take no action on the request to restrict parking on the west side of Holmes Street between 4th and 5th Avenues . Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Beard moved to direct the Chief of Police to allow the black powder shoot at Murphy' s Landing for the events requested in 1994 with approval for events in subsequent years subject to annual review and approval . Motion carried unanimously. (May 28-30, July 2-4, July 15-17, 1994) A brief discussion was held regarding sidewalks along Spencer Street . Mr. Jack Anderson, 13550 Townline Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the podium. He stated that it would be a step back to remove sidewalks already located on the property at 8th Street and Spencer, south side . He stated that the sidewalk is a benefit to have in the winter with snow removal and also with garbage pickup. He hopes the sidewalk can remain in its location. Dave Hutton gave a brief discussion regarding where this property is located and some background about sidewalks and their purposes . He stated that this sidewalk needs to be replaced and the decision needs to be made if it will be put back in once it is taken out . He stated that the policy is directed to put sidewalks on collector streets . Mayor Laurent stated that this issue should be addressed at a Committee of the Whole and to discuss policies regarding sidewalks and local streets . He directed staff to proceed in that direction. Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing regarding the modification of the Redevelopment Plan for MN. River Valley Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the Financing Plans for TIF Districts 2 , 3 , 4 , 7, and 9 . Barry Stock nave a brief summary regarding this ratter. He stated that the Planning Commission determined that the proposed modifications did not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The amendments to the Redevelopment Plan primarily consist c= expansion of the housing and redevelopment project area tc inclu^e property Official Proceedings of the May 3, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -3- that was recently acquired by the City south of the Senior High School . These amendments also address public improvement costs associated with various redevelopment, recreational and sewer projects . He stated that there is no fiscal and economic impact on other taxing jurisdictions within the City. The resolution approves the proposed modifications to the Redevelopment Plan and modifications to the Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 2, 3, 4, 7, & 9 . He recommends approval of said resolution. Mayor Laurent asked if there were any comments from the audience . There were none. Sweeney/Dirks moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Dirks offered Resolution No. 3998, a Resolution of the City of Shakopee approving modification of redevelopment plan for Minnesota River Valley Redevelopment Project No. 1, and approving modification of Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 2, 3, 4, 7 and 9, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Lynch offered Resolution No. 4000, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee Approving a Change of Control of Amzak Cable, Midwest, Inc . , the Current Holder of a Franchise Authorizing the Installation, Operation and Maintenance of a Cable Communications System in the City of Shakopee, and move its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Dave Hutton gave a brief background regarding the development of the trunk sanitary sewer charge to help finance the Chaska-Shakopee Interceptor. He gave the following three option: Option 1 is basically all trunk sewers that will be needed by the City for development to the year 2040 and the total area within the anticipated 2040 MUSA boundary (6, 134 acres) . Using this option, the single family rate is around $1, 729 per net acre . Options 2 and 3 only address the areas served by the Chaska Interceptor. Option 2 is only the Chaska Interceptor drainage area using only the 2040 boundary in Shakopee . This results in a single family rate of $1, 154 per acre . The City would then need to utilize special assessments to fund trunk facilities, similar to what was done for the VIP Interceptor. Option 2A includes all anticipa:ed trunk sewers also, so there would be no trunk sewer assessmen:s . The rate for this option is calculated at $1, 989 per acre . Options 3 and 3A uses a 2040 boundary area that includes lands currently wi hin Jackson Township. Option 3 is just the Chaska Interceptor, while Option 3 A includes all trunk facilities as Official Proceedings of the May 3, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -4- well . The trunk sewer rates for these options is $1, 397 per acre or $2330 per acre respectively. He stated that City staff is seeking Council direction on a Trunk Sewer Charge Policy. If Council agrees with using Option 1, staff would be directed to prepare a policy for subsequent adoption. Discussion followed. Beard/Sweeney moved to direct staff to prepare a trunk sanitary sewer charge policy for option one and bring back to Council (All trunk sewers needed for development to the year 2040) . Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent recessed the meeting at 9 :20 p.m. Mayor Laurent reconvened the meeting at 9 : 36 p.m. Mayor Laurent took Eagle Creek Thrift Shop Watermain off of the Consent Agenda because he doesn' t agree to spend $31, 000 to extend the watermain or $5, 000 for a Nitrate Removal Unit . Sweeney/Beard moved to authorize staff to spend up to $5, 000 for a Nitrate Removal Unit for Eagle Creek Thrift Shop. Motion failed unanimously. (Bottled water will continue to be used) Sweeney/Lynch moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute an agreement with Rahr Malting Co. to cover the forcemain and service line costs on their property to serve Malthouse No. 5 . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Lynch/Dirks moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute a contract with Brauer and Associates, LTD. for the purposes of preparing the Downtown Riverfront Plan for a not to exceed fee of $9, 675 . Motion carried with Cncl . Sweeney dissenting. Sweeney/Beard moved to authorize the hiring of an appraiser to perform an appraisal of the parcels within Homestead Ridge 1st Addition in order to calculate the Park Dedication requirement . Motion carried unanimously. Barry Stock gave a brief summary regarding the Community Center. He stated that there are four areas of discussion: Phase 1- Construction Timing; Referendum Timing; Architect Selection; and Phase 1 Facilities . He stated he would like the City Council to provide direction to staff with respect to each of the aforementioned issues . Cncl . Beard suggested getting the audience input regarding this matter. Official Proceedings of the May 3, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -5- A brief discussion was held regarding Phase 1 and the construction timing. Cncls . Lynch, Beard and Dirks stated they would like to see the construction start and not wait until next Spring. Mayor Laurent recognized anyone in the audience wishing to speak on this matter. Paulette Rislund, 503 Hillwood Drive, Shakopee, approached the podium. She stated an importance to allow the public to get involved in the decision making of what is to be included in this facility. She stated that the Park and Rec Board is interested in being involved in the process and is willing to get the public input regarding this matter. Dave Kaufenberg approached the podium. He stated he would like to see this move as quickly as possible, but feels it is also important to get the community input . Joe Zak, 5371 Eagle Creek, Shakopee, approached the podium. He stated that a referendum has already been voted down for this community center and feels the City Council should wait on the construction until a referendum is passed. He feels there are already three facilities similar to this within a ten mile radius . Gary Morke, 1042 Merrifield Street, Shakopee, approached the podium. He feels that it is important to have a facility like this in our community to enable activities for our children. He would like to see the project started. Discussion followed. Mayor Laurent stated that the intent of a G.O. Bond referendum is to determine whether the tax payers want to have their taxes raised, therefore, we need approval by the voters to get that . John Engel, 671 Menke Ave . Shakopee, approached the podium. He feels that this issue has been around for a long time and would like to see the City Council move ahead on this issue . Joe Zak, 5371 Eagle Creek, Shakopee, approached the podium. He stated a concern that nobody knows anything regarding the Council' s committing $6 million of TIF to the community center. He feels the community should be better informed of what is goinc on. The community center was voted down once and he feels the City Council is moving ahead on an issue that was once voted down. Cncl . Lynch stated that all City Council meetings are televised and anyone is welcome to attend any meeting to get better informed of the decisions discussed. Mayor Laurent clarified that Phase I as discussed here this evening does not raise property taxes . Phase II construction would result in an increase in property taxes and that is the reason for the Official Proceedings of the May 3, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -6- referendum, so the community can be involved in the decision making. Gary Morke, 1042 Merrifield Street, Shakopee, approached the podium. He stated that juvenile crime is on the rise and the children need something to do to occupy their time . He would like to see this matter move along. Beard/Lynch moved to utilize the Park and Rec Board to recommend the facilities to be included in Phase I and II for a community center and a time line to proceed. Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Beard moved to commit six million dollars of the TIF dollars to fund a Community Center, per the goals and objectives session last Tuesday. Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Dirks moved to spend six million dollars for a Community Center project, Phase I, regardless of the outcome of a referendum to sell bonds for Phase II of the project . Motion carried with Cncl . Sweeney dissenting. Dirks/Beard moved that Council recommend to the Park and Rec Board to look towards a duel track process where Phase I would be the six million and Phase II would be those amenities not to be included in the six million but to be put towards the public in a referendum. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Lynch moved to direct staff to prepare a R.F. P. and solicit proposals for a construction manager for the community center. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Dirks moved to remove Resolution No. 3984 from the table . Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Lynch Resolution No. 3984, A Resolution Authorizing the Execution of Cooperative Acreement No. 15-9402 with Scott County Covering the City' s Cost Participation on County State Aid Highway 15 Between 13th Avenue and 6th Avenue, SP 70-615-06, SAP 70-615-07, SAP 166-020-06 , and move its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Dirks offered Resolution No. 3999, A Resolution Calling a Hearing on an Improvement to County State Aid Highway 15 (Adams Street) , Between 13th Avenue and 6th Avenue, Project No. 1994-10, and move its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve the application and grant a wine license to Stonebroo{e of Shakopee, Inc . , 2593 County Road 79 . (Motion carried under ccnsent business with Mayor Laurent abstaining from the motion due to a personal conflict . ) Official Proceedings of the May 3 , 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -7- Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve the applications and grant on sale liquor, Sunday on sale liquor and off sale liquor licenses to Canterbury Park Concessions, Inc. , 1100 Canterbury Road. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve the expiration of the letter of credit for the installation of a sidewalk along the north side of Lot 1, Block 1, Century Plaza Square 4th Addition and authorize the release of the developers agreement against this lot . (All other conditions of the developers agreement have been met . ) (Motion carried under consent business. ) Sweeney/Lynch moved to proclaim May 15 through May 24, 1994 as National Public Works Week for the City of Shakopee. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve bills in the amount of $185, 802 . 03 . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Lynch moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute an easement with Minnegasco covering a transmission pipeline located along the southern boundary of Lions Park. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Lynch moved to direct the appropriate City officials to execute the temporary slope easement documents for the City owned Lions Park along County Road 15 for a sum of $8, 200 . and submit the easement to the Scott County Highway Department . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Lynch moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the labor agreement by and between the City of Shakopee and Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees Union Local No. 320, Clerical and Technical Union employees. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3997, A Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for the Public Works Parking Lot Improvements, Project No. 1994-9, and move its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3992 , A Resolution Declaring Adequacy of Petition and Ordering the Preparation of a Report for Paving the Alley in Block 51 Original Shakopee Plat, and move its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Lynch offered Resolution No. 4001, A Resolution Setting the Public Hearing Date to Consider the Vacation of :aspen Road Between County Road 16 and Hauer Trail, and move its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Official Proceedings of the May 3, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -8- Sweeney/Lynch offered Resolution No. 4002, A Resolution Reassessing Certain Property, and move its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Mayor Laurent adjourned the meeting to Tuesday, May 17, 1994, at 8 : 00 p.m. Meeting adjourned at 11 :31 p.m. 1tdidL4 ith S. Cox 6 y Clerk Lisa M. Anderson Recording Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 17, 1994 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 8 :03 p.m. with Cncl . Lynch, Beard, Dirks and Sweeney present. Also present : Dennis Kraft, City Administrator; Barry Stock (at 8 :20) , Asst City Administrator; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; Karen Marty (at 8 :27) , City Attorney; Dave Hutton, Public Works Director, and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk. Mayor Laurent added to the agenda 13a) 1993 Street Reconstruction. Beard/Sweeney moved to approve the agenda as modified. Motion carried unanimously. Liaison reports were given by the Councilmembers . Mayor Laurent gave the Mayor' s report . Mr. Hutton advised council that item 12c) Resolution No. 4005 - Setting Public Hearing to Consider Vacation of Vierling Drive from CR-15 to Harrison Street and a Portion of Presidential Lane needed to be amended but could stay on consent business . Mayor Laurent informed Council that he would be abstaining from the consent items 12b) Resolution No. 4004 - Approving Plans and Ordering Ad for Bids, 1994-7, Vierling Drive Project and 12c) Resolution No. 4005 - Setting Public Hearing to Consider Vacation of Vierling Drive from CR-15 to Presidential Lane and a Portion of Presidential Lane, due to a conflict of interest . Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve the consent business . Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Laurent abstaining from the items listed above . Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve the Minutes of April 19, 1994 . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Beard/Sweeney moved to receive and file the discussion material presented by Holmes & Graven concerning the proposed SRA 1995 Budget . Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Lynch moved to accept the resignation of Joseph Zak from the Planning Commission and Board of Adjustments and Appeals, with regrets . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Lynch moved to direct staff to submit a request to Scott County to perform a warrant study to determine if 4-way stop signs are warranted at 4th Avenue and Fuller Street . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Lynch moved to authorize the Chief of Police to establish 30 minute time limit on parking in front of the Post Office in Official Proceedings of the May 17, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -2- accordance with Section 9 . 08, Subd. 2 of the City Code . (Motion carried under consent business. ) Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing at 8 :24 p.m. on the vacation of Cass Street between 2nd Avenue and 3rd Avenue. There was no one present who wished to speak on the vacation. (Subsequent to setting the public hearing, staff learned that the vacation had already took place in 1907. ) Sweeney/Lynch moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. (No further action was taken. ) Mayor Laurent stated that he had a conflict of interest with some property to be expanded via a purchase agreement and would be abstaining from discussion on the proposed Metropolitan Urban Services Area Expansion and Comprehensive Plan Amendment . Mr. Ekola gave a brief presentation of the MUSA expansion for the area north of the proposed Bypass centerline and wet of CSAH 79 . He stated that the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this issue and is recommending approval . He stated there was a portion of land west of Tahpah Park that would be changed to park dedication on the direction of the Park Advisory Board. Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve the proposed 1980 Comprehensive Plan amendment and the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) expansion for the area north of the Shakopee Bypass and west of CSAH 79 . Motion carried unanimously. Cncl . Sweeney stated that the Racetrack Area Land Uses (contained in the May 10, 1994, memo from Paul Bilotta, Senior Planner) (CC DOC #209) would be considered zoning and mapping items, therefore the Council should not be voting on this by bits and pieces . Mr. Ekola explained that CR-16 needs to be in place to connect CR- 17 to CR-83 when the Southerly Bypass is complete . The County desires to work with the City on the design requirements . The proposed land uses and further roadways around the Racetrack will provide guidance to the County for the design of CR-16 . Mr. Hutton stated that the City needs to know where anticipated street intersections and traffic volumes will be located to establish a design for the connecting roadways . Beard/Dirks Loved to indicate a general approval of the land uses and access points as shown on exhibits C and D for the purposes of redesigning :he C.S .A.H. 16 roadway. ;CC DOC #209) Cncl . Beard suggested closely w•atchirc the traffic counts being done in this area . Official Proceedings of the May 17, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -3- Cncl . Sweeney restated that the Council would be rezoning and changing land uses by voting for this motion. Mayor Laurent suggested that staff look at not zoning residential next to the race track. Ms . Marty indicated that Council would be suggesting general land uses for the basis of counting traffic on a road. This motion would not indicate a rezoning or mapping change. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Hutton gave a brief presentation of the petition from Scherer Bros . Lumber requesting the City prepare a feasibility report for an area wide drainage study. There was no commitment by Scherer Bros. to pay for the report if the City did not do the project. He stated that a storm water management consultant would be better able to do this report within the desired time frame. Discussion was held concerning Certainteed putting up berms on their property for runoff . Ms . Marty stated that to the effect this berming is blocking a natural drainage way and creating flooding of streams, that would be a liability issue. Cncl . Sweeney suggested that while the consultants are looking at the drainage issue that the City attorney look at the legal ramifications of the berm on Certainteed' s property since these issues may come up at a public hearing. Sweeney/Lynch offered Resolution No. 4011, A Resolution Declaring Adequacy of Petition and Ordering the Preparation of a Feasibility Report for Drainage Improvements for the Drainage Area Tributary to the Proposed Scherer Brothers Lumber Company Site, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Beard moved to utilize Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Assoc to complete the feasibility report for an estimated cost $6 , 50 and that if the project is ordered, these costs will be included in the overall project costs but that if the improvements are not ordered, Scherer Bros . Lumber will reimburse the City for these ccsts in their entirety contingent upon Scherer Bros . agreement to pay in the even the project is not ordered. Motion carried unanir.:ously. Sweeney/Lynch moved to authorize the purchase of a utility trailer from Lano Equipment, Shakopee for a total price of $3 , 519 . 83 utilizing the Capital Equipment Fund in the Parks Department . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Official Proceedings of the May 17, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -4- Sweeney/Lynch moved to direct the appropriate city officials to arrange a hearing before the City Council for the purpose of taking action against the license of Springer' s for allowing alcoholic beverages to be displayed after hours on 02-06-94 . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve the application and grant a temporary on-sale non intoxicating malt liquor license to the Shakopee Jaycees for June 4th and 5th, 1994 at Tahpah Park. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Lynch moved to appoint Barry Stock as Acting Clerk from May 25th through June 1st and from July 24th through July 30th, 1994 . (Motion carried under consent business. ) Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve bills in the amount of $550, 877. 72 . (Motion carried under consent business. ) Mr. Stock gave a brief presentation on the Park and Recreation Advisory Board' s meeting with regard to the community center. He stated the public hearing dates would be May 23 at 7 :30 p.m. and June 1 at 7 : 00 p.m. to solicit input . Mr. Stock stated the six criteria suggested by the Park Board for the endorsement by the City Council . Cncl . Beard stated that he was especially agreeable to the $6 million in tax increment funds and that the public would only be paying $40 a year if additional costs would result in a tax increase . Lynch/Dirks moved to adopt the community center development criteria as presented by the Shakopee Park and Recreation Advisory Board. 1 . Efforts will be made to present a proposal that is fiscally responsible and provides for the present and future park and recreation needs of Shakopee . 2 . The $6 million of tax increment funds will be used to construct Phase I recreational facilities regardless of any potential Phase II referendum results . 3 . The site acquired by the City of Shakopee Southwest of the Senior High School will be the location of the recreational facilities . 4 . Any potential costs for Phase II construction would not result in a tax increase of over $40 . 00 per year on a home in Shakopee with an average estimated market value of $80 , 000 . Official Proceedings of the May 17, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -5- 5 . The facility to be constructed will be a gathering place for all ages . 6 . Preliminary site work will be completed in 1994 . Cncl . Sweeney stated that he could not support criteria number 2 . Sweeney/Beard moved to amend the motion to removed criteria number 2 from the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Chris Dirks, 1199 Tyler Street, commented that the community voted the community center down and the City is going forward with it anyway. He did not see the purpose for building the center especially since Mystic Lake was also building one and Chaska already had one. Mr. Dirks stated that the City should build another fire station instead. Mayor Laurent explained to Mr. Dirks the reason the referendum was declined by the public and therefore, also the community center. Motion carried unanimously on main motion as amended. Lynch/Beard moved to adopt the community center development criteria number 2 as presented by the Shakopee Park and Recreation Advisory Board. Mr. Kraft informed Council that it appears to be against Minnesota Law to hold a referendum to guide a Council on a policy direction on how to spend TIF funds . Motion carried with Cncl . Sweeney dissenting. Sweeney/Lynch offered Resolution No 4003 , A Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for the 1994 Sidewalk Project, No. 1994-3 , and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Lynch offered Resolution No. 4004 , A Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for Vierling Drive, from County Road 15 to Presidential Lane, Project No. 1994-7, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business with Mayor Laurent abstaining. ) Sweeney/Lynch offered Resolution No. 4005 , A Resolution Setting the Public Hearing Date to Consider the Vacation of a Portion of Vierling Drive, Between County Road 15 and Harrison Street and a Portion of Presidential Lane, and moved its adoption. (Motion_ carried under consent business with Mayor Laurent abstaining. ) Sweeney/Lynch offered Resolution No. 4006 , A Resolution Acceptinc Bids on 11th Avenue Storm Sewer Laterals Project No. 1994-c , and Official Proceedings of the May 17, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -6- moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve of a contingency fund in the amount of 10% of the contract for use by the City Engineer in authorizing change orders and quantity adjustments on this project . (Motion carried under consent business. ) Mr. Hutton stated that the design for the downtown streetscape is completed and Staff would like to go out for bids . Mr. Hutton showed Council a map of the proposed design and went through the construction phase. Mr. Hutton stated that he would need to speak with SPDC concerning some additional sewer/water line extensions. Mayor Laurent stated that he received a phone call from a downtown business owner who was opposed to this project and indicated that he thought it was more feasible for the city to not spend the money on something that may get torn down in the future (depending on development in Blocks 3 and 4) . This individual also stated that they would like no construction for one year in the downtown area and construct next year. Mr. Hutton explained that the council could write in the bids to delay certain portions until 1995 but this could be costly for the developers and the City. He stated the total cost, including engineering costs, would be around $350, 000 . Mr. Hutton stated he would not like to see the City bid alternates on this project. Discussion was held concerning the nodes into the Imperial Wok parking lot entrance. Mr. Hutton explained it was for the protection of the vehicles parking around the entrance and also the customers to this location. He also stated that the final wear course could be delayed for one year. Mr. Hutton stated that Council could delete or add items to the contract up to 25 percent . Lynch/Beard offered Resolution No. 4008, A Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for Downtown Streetscape, Phase II, Project No. 1993-12, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Lynch offered Resolution No. 4009, A Resolution Setting the Public Hearing Date to Consider the Vacation of Southerly 203 feet of the Two 20 Foot Wide Drainage and Utility Easements Located Adjacent to the Lot Line between Lot 4 and Lot 5, Block 1, Valley Park 6th Addition, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Sweeney/Lynch offered Resolution No. 4010, A Resolution Setting the Public Hearing Date to Consider the Vacation of the Drainage and Utility Easements Located Adjacent to the Lot Line between Lot 2 Official Proceedings of the May 17, 1994 Shakopee City Council Page -7- and Lot 3, Block 1, Century Plaza Square 3rd Addition, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Mr. Hutton gave a brief description of the temporary pavement occurring on two blocks of Spencer last year. Mr. Hentges is now requesting this temporary pavement be considered permanent . Mr. Hutton expressed some concerns due to the fact the City will now be doing inspections after the pavement is laid. Mr. Hutton went over the six conditions with Council that he felt were appropriate in this situation. He stated that the whole road is low from a half inch to two inches, which could mean the road has settled over the winter. Sweeney/Lynch moved to authorize the City Engineer to proceed with testing as outlined in Mr. Hutton' s memo at Mr. Hentges expense. (CC DOC #210) Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Lauren adjourned the meeting at 9 :55 p.m. Ilk 0 via ti-. •ith S . Co y Clerk Debra Zabel Recording Secretary � a6 TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator Karen Marty, City Attorney FROM: Tom Steininger, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Pawn Shop Ordinance Amendment DATE: 05 24 94 INTRODUCTION: The owner of Sporting Arms, Mr. Watzl, has written to Council requesting that the newly passed pawnshop ordinance be amended. • BACKGROUND: In his letter, Mr. Watzl indicates that the cost of a license, video equipment and a computer would pose an unreasonable hardship upon his business. When this ordinance was requested, it was to provide the police department with information to investigate thefts, not to cause anyone undue hardship or to place them at a business disadvantage. The police department does not object to businesses which fall under the ordinance but which conduct fewer than two hundred (200) transactions per year providing this information in the form of good quality polaroid pictures and hard copy records which are legible and complete. The license fee is not a police issue. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Amend the Ordinance #376 as requested by Mr. Watzl. 2 . Leave Ordinance #376 as written. RECOMMENDATION: None. ACTION REQUESTED: None. The purpose of this memo is to supply information on a policy issue. The Police Department neither supports nor opposes Mr. Watzl ' s request to amend Ordinance #376. SPORTING ARMS May 16, 1994 CITY OF MAY 1 7 1994 Shakopee City Council RECE I E 129 1st Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Council Members : This letter is in regard to the recently enacted pawn shop ordinance. I own a store located in the old stage coach building located near the intersection of County Road 18 and Highway 101 . The name of my business is "Sporting Arms" . I sell nigh quality hunting clothes, western art, new and used firearms and accessories . A small part of my business involves loaning money and taking firearms as security. I have found that a small number of my customers would rather borrow money against their firearms rather than sell them outright when they need extra money. This is a very small part of my business . At this time, I have about 30 firearms in my store that are being kept for security on loans. I understand the reasons for the recent ordinance. I don 't believe, however, there is a need to include a business such as mine where so few items are involved. I would like to request an amendment to the new ordinance . That would exempt a business that loans money on less than 200 items . This amendment would enable me to maintain this service for my customers . I understand that the police need to investigate thefts . I take great care to identify all loan customers by picture I .D. I record addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth and social security numbers of all loan customers . I would gladly comply with any police request to inspect firearms held on loan and my records of loan customers . If the counsel felt it was necessary, I would photograph each loan customer and give the film to the police department . The cost of licensing, computer and video equipment required under the new ordinance would be an undue hardship on my business. .90502 D. P . Watzl Sporting Arms, Owner cc: Shakopee City Council Shakopee City Attorney Shakopee City Administrator Detective Russ Lawrence 8472 E. Shakopee, MN 55379 Highway 101 i (612) 496-0248 378 ORDINANCE NO. , FOURTH SERIES AN ORD:NANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 6 , OTHER BUSINESS REGULATION AND LICENSING, SECTION 6 . 28, PAWNBROKERS, PRECIOUS METAL DEALERS, AND SECONDHAND DEALERS, BY REPEALING SUED. 7, IDENTIFICATION OF SELLER OF PLEDGER, SUED. 8, RECORD KEEPING, AND SUED. 9, HOLDING PERIOD, AND ADOPTING THREE NEW SUBDIVISIONS IN LIEU THEREOF, RELATING TO THE SAME SUBJECT. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS : Section 1 - That City Code Chapter 6, Other Business Regulation and Licensing, Section 6 . 28, Pawnbrokers, Precious Metal Dealers, and Secondhand Dealers, is hereby amended by repealing Subd. 7, Identification of Seller or Pledger, Subd. 8, Record Keeping, and Subd. 9, Holding Period, and adopting three new subdivisions in lieu thereof, which shall read as follows : SEC. 6 .28 . PAWNBROKERS, PRECIOUS METAL DEALERS, AND SECONDHAND DEALERS. Subd. 7 . Identification of Seller or Pledger. The safety of the public is compromised when stolen property is easily pawned or sold to pawnbrokers, precious metal dealers, or secondhand dealers. Due to the nature of the business of pawnbrokers, precious metal dealers, and secondhand dealers, and the attraction pawnshops, precious metal businesses, and secondhand businesses have to the criminally disposed, special regulation of the transactions is necessary. A. A licensee shall not accept items of property unless the seller or pledger provides to the licensee one of the following forms of identification. No other form of identification shall be accepted. 1. A valid Minnesota driver' s license; 2 . A Minnesota Identification Card issued by the Department of Public Safety; or 3 . A photo identification issued by the state of residency of the person from whom the item was received. B. A pawnbroker or secondhand goods dealer shall run a videotape during all hours of operation. Tapes shall be retained a minimum of 30 days . The quality of the videotape shall be sufficient to clearly identify the seller or pledger, and to clearly identify the goods involved in the transaction. Each tape shall automatically record the date and time of each transaction. Videotape recordings shall be provided to the Police Department upon request . C. A pawnbroker or secondhand goods dealer who conducts fewer than two hundred (200) purchases, pawns, or sales per year may elect not to run a videotape . If a videotape is not utilized, then the pawnbroker or secondhand goods dealer must photograph each seller or pledger. The photograph must be sufficient to clearly identify the seller or pledger, and must be automatically dated. Prints of the photographs shall be made within 24 hours and kept a minimum of 30 days . The photographs shall be provided to the Police Department upon request . Subd. 8 . Record Keeping. A. At the time of a receipt of any item of property, whether sold or pawned, the licensee shall immediately and legibly record the information described below. The record shall be in the English language, and kept on computer disc . The computer records shall be on disk in a format compatible with WordPerfect or ASCII, or else the licensee shall provide the Police Department with a copy of the software at the licensee' s expense. The form of the data shall be approved by the Police Department. Each record shall contain the following information: 1. An accurate description of the item of property including, but not limited to, any trademark, identification number, serial number, model number, brand name, or other identifying mark on such item; 2 . The date and time the item of property was received by the pawnbroker, precious metal dealer, or secondhand dealer; 3 . The name, address, home telephone number, work telephone number, race, sex, height, weight, hair color, eye color, and date of birth of the person from whom the item of property was received; 4. The type of identification produced by the seller or pledger, and its number; and 5. Other information reasonably required by the Police Department . 2 B. A pawnbroker or secondhand goods dealer who conducts fewer than two hundred (200) purchases, pawns, or sales per year may elect not to use a computer for recordkeepina. If a computer is not utilized, then the pawnbroker or secondhand goods dealer must legibly record the information described above. The record must be in the English language, and kept in a book or iournal which has page numbers that are pre-printed and in indelible ink. The form of the data shall be approved by the Police Department . C. B- The licensee shall make these records available during regular business hours and at any other reasonable times for inspection by the City. These records shall be retained by the licensee for at least four (4) years . D. Gr For the following items whether sold or pawned, the licensee shall complete forms approved by the City and send the forms weekly to the Police Department : 1. Any item with a serial number, identification number, or "Operation Identification" number; 2 . Cameras; 3 . Electronic audio or video equipment; 4. Precious jewelry, gemstones, diamonds, and metals; 5. Artist-signed or artist-attributed works of art; 6. Guns; 7. Any item not included in (1) - (6) above, except furniture and kitchen or laundry appliances, which the licensee intends to sell for more than two hundred dollars ($200) . E. The weekly report forms submitted to the Police Department shall contain the following information: 1. All information listed in paragraph A above; and 2 . Whether the item was purchased or pawned. Subd. 9. Holding Period. A. Whenever the Police Department notifies the licensee not to sell an item, the item shall not be sold or removed from the licensed premises for a period of 60 3 days, or intil authorized to be released by the Police Department , whichever comes first . B. The Police Department may remove items believed to be stolen from the licensee' s business and hold them in the Police Department property room until it is determined whether they are stolen or not . Under Minn. Stat . Sec . 609 . 523 , the Police Department may return stolen property to the owner, with no recompense to the licensee . Upon criminal conviction, restitution may be sought for losses experienced by a licensee. Each licensee is responsible for establishing procedures to avoid receiving stolen property. C. Any item sold or pawned to a licensee, for which a weekly report to the police is required under Subd. 8 .D above, shall not be sold or otherwise transferred for thirty (30) days after the date of the sale or pawn. D. Each pledger shall be given a deadline for redeeming pawned property, after which date the licensee may sell the item. This date shall be a day on which the licensee is open for regular business . Note: The rcdlincd language is deleted; the underlined language is inserted. Section 2 - General Provisions. City Code Chapter 1, General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty For Violation, and Section 6 . 99, Violation a Misdemeanor or Petty Misdemeanor, are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3 - Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest : City Clerk Approved as to form: (.1-2, / A City Attorney Published in the Shakopee Valley = s on the day of , 1994 . [1PAWN) 4 /Oc June 3, 1994 Shakopee City Hall 129 S. Holmes Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Major Laurent and City Council: As the President of the Shakopee Jaycees I 'm asking the city to help us in a time of need. We have been notified that our office space will no longer be available to us as of July 1, 1994 and it is my understanding that their is space available at the old City Hall building on the second floor. Considering the amount of money donated to the city ($30,00Cin the last year) by the Shakopee Jaycees it is my hope you would rent the office space to us for $1.00 per month with a 60 day notice if the building is sold. I will be attending the city council meeting Tuesday June 7, 1994 is you have any questions. ,f Sincerely, Shakopee Jaycees President Paul Burton 41- Ick c, , MEMO TO: Shakopee City Council FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Shakopee Jaycees - Request for Office Space DATE: June 7, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Staff has received a correspondence from Mr. Paul Burton, Shakopee Jaycee President . Mr. Burton is requesting that the City Council consider leasing space to the Shakopee Jaycees for office and meeting room needs . BACKGROUND: It is my understanding that the Shakopee Jaycees formerly received space from Joe Theis for a small office. The space is no longer available . The Jaycees use the small office to store a computer and associated Jaycee files . Presently much of the space at the former city hall is vacant . However, the City currently does lease the majority of the second floor to Krucial Data Supply Inc. (See attachment #1) . Note that there are presently two small offices on the second floor that are vacant . If City Council would like to assist the Jaycees in their efforts, staff would propose that the two small offices indicated on attachment #1 be leased to the Jaycees for $1 . 00 per month. The proposed lease arrangement that staff is proposing would be similar to the lease agreement that was approved for the Shakopee Boy Scouts use of space at the former community recreation building. The proposed lease agreement would include a 60 day cancellation provision. It would also include the appropriate provisions that would limit the City' s liability. A representative from the Shakopee Jaycees will be at tonight' s meeting. ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute a lease agreement by and between the City of Shakopee and the Shakopee Jaycees for office space located on the second floor of the former city hall building at a rate of $1 . 00 per month. 2 . Do not approve authorizing the execution of a lease agreement by and between the City of Shakopee and the Shakopee Jaycees. 3 . Table action pending further information from staff . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1 . ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute a lease agreement by and between the City of Shakopee and the Shakopee Jaycees for office space located on the second floor of the former city hall building at a rate of $1 . 00 per month. Attachment #1 h X A C A S - CO \ D - OOR H9 ^ 99 (vim O c c! A MENS RR SaYGee- WOMEN$ _ Stam' RR r O co MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer SUBJECT: Vacating Jasper Road DATE: May 31, 1994 INTRODUCTION: By Resolution No. 4001, the City Council of Shakopee has set a public hearing to consider the vacation of Jasper Road for June 7, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. or thereafter. BACKGROUND: On May 3, 1994, the City Council of Shakopee adopted Resolution No. 4001 which initiated the vacation process for Jasper Road from Hauer Trail to County Road 16. The vacation of Jasper Road was requested by staff due to extremely high maintenance costs associated with Jasper Road. Jasper Road is scheduled for reconstruction in 1997 in the Capital Improvement Plan adopted by City Council last October. Staff has presented the vacation of Jasper Road to the Planning Commission as required by law. The Planning Commission passed a motion finding the vacation of Jasper Road to be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Jasper Road is currently utilized by one residence for access to their driveway. Staff has explored three alternatives for vacating Jasper Road while still maintaining access. These alternatives are to construct a cul-de-sac on Hauer Trail, to leave Hauer Trail a dead end street or to turn Hauer Trail into a dead end alley. Staff will give a presentation of all options at the public hearing. The costs for each alternative are as follows: Alternative Estimated Cost Cul-de-sac $20,088.75 Dead End Street $12,856.25 Dead End Alley $19,566.25 The current Roadway Design Criteria requires dead end streets to have cul-de-sacs for turning around. The dead end street alternative was considered since Hauer Trail does not currently conform to design standards in regards to width and section, and will need to be reconstructed to bring the roadway up to current standards. The dead end roadway could be eliminated with a cul-de-sac when the road is rebuilt. The dead end alley option was considered based on the assumption that it would be less expensive than a cul-de-sac. The cost estimates show little difference in the cost of a cul-de-sac and a dead end alley, while a cul-de-sac is a more preferable option. With this, staff is recommending constructing a cul-de-sac on Hauer Trail with driveway access to the residence at the corner of Hauer Trail and Jasper Road. Due to the presence of numerous utilities in the Jasper road right-of-way, staff is recommending retaining permanent drainage and utility easements for the entire area of the Jasper road right-of- way. Since Jasper Road was acquired from Eagle Creek Township, and is in unplatted lands of Shakopee, the preparation of a resolution vacating the roadway and the associated legal description will require extensive research. Staff is seeking direction from Council as to which vacation option is preferred before time is spent researching the legal description. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Vacate Jasper Road and construct a cul-de-sac on the end of Hauer trail. 2. Vacate Jasper Road and leave Hauer Trail as a dead end street. 3. Vacate Jasper Road and construct a dead end alley in the Hauer Trail right-of-way. 4. Do not vacate Jasper Road. 5. Table the vacation of Jasper Road to obtain additional information from staff. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Direct staff to prepare the resolution and legal description for vacating Jasper Road as described in Alternative No. 1, and report back to City Council with the completed resolution for action by the City Council. DMN/pmp MEM4012 / 16 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Karen Marty, City Attorney, DATE: June 3 , 1994 RE: Draft New Zoning Ordinance BACKGROUND: For the past year the Zoning Ordinance Review Committee, the Planning Commission, and the City Council have been reviewing and revising a draft replacement for the entire zoning chapter of the City Code. The Planning Commission held a many-times-continued public hearing prior to recommending a draft to the City Council . After consideration, the City Council also requested revisions to the draft, which should be considered in a public hearing. Some of the major changes, such as the creation of the Major Recreation Zone and the elimination of the Race Track District, have not had a public hearing yet . The actual provisions of the draft zoning ordinance were provided to you at your last meeting. Due to the need for a public hearing, no action item was placed before you then. The public hearing is advertised for June 7, 1994 . In preparing the zoning ordinance for adoption, I incorporated the dozens of changes requested over the past few months . I drafted a repeal of Chapter 11, the existing zoning ordinance, but forgot that the old sign ordinance and official map provisions were located in other chapters. Both are included in the new ordinance. A repeal of those sections needs to be added to the ordinance before you. I also have now received legal descriptions for ValleyFair! and Canterbury Downs, which belong in Exhibit A of the ordinance. Since the zoning ordinance is too lengthy to duplicate except when absolutely necessary, I have reprinted only the first page (now two pages) of the ordinance and of the summary, along with a new Exhibit A. Please discard the old first page of the ordinance and the old first page of the summary, and replace them with the new first and second pages of each. Likewise please discard the old page for Exhibit A and replace it with the new Exhibit A packet . ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Adopt the new zoning ordinance. 2 . Amend the new zoning ordinance, then adopt it . 3 . Do not adopt the new zoning ordinance. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Ordinance No. 377, an ordinance amending the City Code by repealing Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation (Zoning) ; Sec . 2 . 90, Official Maps - Effect and Procedures, of Chapter 2, Administration and General Government; and Sec . 4 .30, Signs - Construction, Maintenance and Permits, of Chapter 4, Construction Licensing, Permits and Regulations; and adopting one new chapter in lieu thereof relating to the same subject, and move its adoption. [3CCL] Zoning Ordinance Tables for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota Permitted and Conditional Uses, as Recommended by the Shakopee Planning Commission for the Residential, Commercial, Industrial, and Major Recreation Zoning Districts (Updated:June 1994) {PLANCOMM\ZOTABLES.LSf; USES RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS X = Permitted O = Conditional Ag RR R-IA R-1B R-IC R_2 R_3 Agricultural Uses X X Agricultural Research Facilities 0 Animal Hospitals and Veterinary Clinic 0 Bed and Breakfast Inns 0 0 0 0 Cemeteries 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 Churches and Other Places of Worship 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Day Care Facilities (12 or fewer persons) X X X X X X X Day Care Facilities (13 - 16 persons) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Day Care, Group Family Care(14 or fewer children) X X X X X Developments with > 1 building on lot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dwellings, Single Family Detached X X X X X X Dwellings, Existing Single Family Attached X X Dwellings, Two Family X X Dwellings, Existing Two Family X Dwellings, Multiple-family (2-4 units) X Dwellings, Multiple-family (up to 6 units) 0 Dwellings, Multiple-family (3 or more units) X Forestry and Nursery Uses X X Funeral Homes 0 Home Occupations 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hospitals and Clinics 0 0 0 Kennels X 0 Riding Academies X 0 Nursing Homes 0 0 Public Buildings X X X X X X X Public Recreation X X X X X X X Recreation, Commercial (Minor) 0 0 Residential Facilities, Licensed (6 or fewer persons) X X X X X X X Residential Facilities, Licensed (7 - 16 persons) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retail Sales, Nursery and Garden Supplies 0 Schools (Grades K- 12) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Seasonal Produce Stands X 0 Structures exceeding height limit (water towers, etc) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Structures, Relocated 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 Windmills 0 0 0 X X X X Utility Services X X X X X X X Essential Utility Service Structures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 USES COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS X = Permitted 0 = Conditional B,=1 B-2 111-1 Animal Hospitals and Veterinary Clinics 0 0 Automobile or Boat Sales, Services and Repairs 0 Bed and Breakfast Inns 0 0 Bus Terminals and Taxi Stands 0 Car Washes 0 Churches 0 Clinics, Medical or Dental X X Day Care Facilities 0 0 0 Developments with more than 1 Principal Structure on Lot 0 0 0 Drive-up/Drive-through Windows 0 0 Dwellings, Multi-family 0 0 Dwellings, when combined with Permitted Use X Financial Institutions X X X Funeral Homes 0 0 Gas Stations/Convenience Stores 0 0 Hospitals 0 0 Hotels X Motels and Hotels X 0 Offices, Administrative, Executive, and Professional X X X Open Sales Lots (with exterior storage) 0 Parking Lots or Structures 0O Private Lodges and Clubs 0 Printing or Publishing Facilities 0 Public Buildings X X X Recreation, Commercial (Minor) 0 Recreation, Commercial (Minor, but limited to health and athletic) 0 Recreation, Commercial (Both Major and Minor) 0 Restaurants, Class I X X Restaurants, Class II 0 0 Restaurants/Cafeterias to serve employees on site 0 Retail Business X X Retail Uses Associated with a Permitted Use 0 Storage, Assembly or servicing incidental to perm. use 0 Services Associated with a Permitted Use 0 Structures, Relocated 0 0 0 Structures exceeding height limit(chimneys, towers, etc.) 0 0 0 Taverns 0 0 Theaters 0 0 Utility Services X X 0 Utility Service Structures 0 0 {PLANCOMM ZOTABLES.LST; 2 USES INDUSTRIAL AND MAJOR RECREATION ZONING DISTRICTS X = Permitted 0 = Conditional II=1 II=2 MR Agricultural (Limited to Field Crops) X X Airport and Heliports 0 0 Clubs and Lodges, Private 0 Commercial Vehicle Rental Facilities 0 X Concrete, Asphalt Plants 0 Day Care Facilities 0 0 Development with more than one Principal Structure on the lot 0 0 0 Drive up / Drive through Window 0 Dwellings/Residences for Security Personnel 0 0 Elevators, Grain 0 Health and Athletic Facilities 0 Horse Care Uses (Boarding, Training, Showing, Grooming, Vet. Clinics) 0 Hotels, Motels, and Conference Centers 0 Junk yards 0 Landscaping Services and Contractors 0 X Manufacturing, Fabrication, Processing, & Assembly in Enclosed Building, except those involving those fitting in Mandatory EIS Category 0 X Manufacturing, Fabrication, Processing, Assembly, Storage, &Research, that fits in Mandatory EIS Category 0 Motor Freight Terminals X Offices, Business, Corporate, and Professional 0 Offices within Principal Structure, and Associated with Permitted Use X Public Buildings X X X Public Recreation X Recreation, Major or Minor 0 Recycling or Composting Facilities 0 Research Laboratories, except those fitting in Mandatory EIS Category X Research Laboratories within Enclosed Building X Restaurants, Class I X Restaurants, Class II 0 Restaurants/Cafeterias to serve employees on site 0 0 Retail Sales of Heavy Industrial Equipment, etc. X Retail Sales of Products Manufactured, etc. on site, etc. 0 0 Retail Uses and Entertainment Facilities 0 Schools, Industrial or Technical Training 0 Self-Storage Facilities 0 Supply Yards, Contractor's X Supplying Goods and Services to Industrial Uses X X {Continued on next page.) 3 USES INDUSTRIAL AND MAJOR RECREATION ZONING DISTRICTS Page 2 X = Permitted 0 = Conditional I_1 I_2 MR Structures exceeding height limit (chimneys, towers, etc.) 0 0 0 Structures, Relocated 0 Utility Services X X X Utility Service Structures X X 0 Vehicle Repair 0 0 Warehousing and Wholesaling X Warehousing and Wholesaling within Enclosed Building, Except those fitting within a Mandatory EIS Category X {PL A..COMM\ZOTABLES.IST} 4 ^i EXPLANATION TO ORDINANCE 377 PURPOSE: To amend the City Code by repealing Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation (Zoning) ; and adopting one new chapter relating to the same subject matter. REMARKS : Early last summer a Zoning Ordinance Review Committee was created to review the existing zoning ordinance and a new draft zoning ordinance being provided by a consultant. Over a series of meetings, the draft was substantially revised and improved, and then sent to the Planning Commission. Through the fall and early winter of 1993 the Planning Commission diligently reviewed the Zoning Ordinance Review Committee' s draft zoning ordinance, and made modifications and corrections based on their unique knowledge and experience in zoning matters. Their draft of the zoning ordinance then was forwarded to the City Council, which in turn spent many hours considering the implication and application of the draft text, and further refining the provisions. Attached is the ordinance as improved by these reviews . All requested changes have been incorporated at this point . Two final changes should be mentioned: staff was directed to set a minimum lot depth in the R-1A zone, because the previously drafted depth did not fit after the minimum lot size was changed. Staff is now recommending that the minimum lot depth be set at 160 feet, and is recommending that the minimum lot width, which should be half the depth, be lowered from 90 feet to 80 feet . In addition, I noticed that the conditions for commercial feedlots refer to disposal of manure. This should be waste, since manure is not the only waste. The attached draft incorporates these changes, so if Council does not agree, the draft should be amended. ALTERNATIVES : 1 . Adopt the new zoning ordinance. 2 . Amend the new zoning ordinance, then adopt it. 3 . Do not adopt the new zoning ordinance. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Ordinance No. 377 , an ordinance amending the City Code by repealing Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation (Zoning) , and adopting one new chapter relating to the same subject matter. , and move its adoption. Submitted by: /X City Atto ney ORDINANCE NO. , FOURTH SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE CITY CODE BY REPEALING CHAPTER 11, LAND USE REGULATION (ZONING) ; SEC. 2 . 90, OFFICIAL MAPS - EFFECT AND PROCEDURES, OF CHAPTER 2, ADMINISTRATION AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT; AND SEC. 4 .30, SIGNS - CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND PERMITS, OF CHAPTER 4, CONSTRUCTION LICENSING, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS; AND ADOPTING ONE NEW CHAPTER IN LIEU THEREOF RELATING TO THE SAME SUBJECT. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1 - That the City Code is hereby amended by repealing Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation (Zoning) ; Sec. 2 . 90, Official Maps - Effect and Procedures, of Chapter 2, Administration and General Government; and Sec. 4 . 30, Signs - Construction, Maintenance and Permits, of Chapter 4, Construction Licensing, Permits and Regulations; and adopting one new chapter in lieu thereof, which shall read as follows: CHAPTER 11 ZONING SEC. 11. 01. TITLE, PURPOSE AND INTERPRETATION. Subd. 1. Title. Chapter 11 of the Shakopee City Code shall be known and may be referred to as the "Zoning Ordinance" or the "Zoning Chapter" . When referred to herein it shall be known as "this Chapter" . Subd. 2 . Purpose. This Chapter is enacted to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the City of Shakopee through the following: A. encouraging the planned and orderly development of residential, business, industrial, recreational and public land; B. providing adequate light, air and convenience of access to property; C. limiting congestion in the public right-of-way; D. preventing overcrowding of land and undue concentration of population and structures; E. providing for the compatible integration of land uses and the most appropriate use of land; F. encouraging development in accordance with the City' s comprehensive plan; G. conserving the natural beauty and environmental assets of the City; H. protecting water resources and water quality; I. facilitating the provision of water, utilities and sewage disposal to property as appropriate; J. protecting the population from fire and other hazards to public safety; and K. providing for the administration of this Chapter and amendments to it, defining the powers and duties imposed by this Chapter and prescribing penalties for violation of its provisions . Subd. 3 . Scope. From and after the effective date of this Chapter, the use of all land and all structures erected, altered, enlarged, or relocated, and every use accessory thereto, shall be in conformance with the provisions of this Chapter. Any existing use, structure, lot, or development which was legally established but is not in conformance with the provisions of this Chapter shall be regarded as non-conforming and may continue in existence only for such period of time and under such conditions as is provided for in Sec. 11 . 91 of this Chapter. Subd. 4 . Application of Rules. A. In their interpretation and application, the provisions of this Chapter shall be held to be the minimum requirements for the promotion of the public health, safety, general welfare, and sound planning. B. Where any provision of this Chapter is either more restrictive or less restrictive than a comparable provision imposed by any other code, ordinance, statute, or regulation of any kind, the more restrictive provision, or the provision which imposes a higher standard or requirement, shall prevail . C. No land shall be used, and no structure shall be erected, converted, enlarged, reconstructed, altered, removed, or used, for any purpose or in any manner which is not in conformity with the provisions of this Chapter. D. Structures within the public right-of-way are not covered by the provisions of this Chapter except as specifically provided in this Chapter. E. Words or terms defined in this Chapter shall have the meanings assigned to them unless such meaning is clearly contrary to the intent of this Chapter. The present tense shall include the past and future tenses. Subd. 5 . Severability. Every section or subdivision of this Chapter is declared separable from every other section or subdivision. If any section or subdivision is held to be invalid by competent authority, no other section or subdivision shall be invalidated by such action or decision. SEC. 11. 02 . DEFINITIONS. The following terms, as used in this Chapter, shall have the following meanings : 1. "Accessory Use" - See "Use, Accessory" . 2 . "Agricultural Use" - The use of land for the growing or production of field crops, livestock, or livestock products, including but not limited to the following: A. field crops such as barley, soy beans, corn, hay, oats, potatoes, rye, sorghum, and sunflowers . B. livestock such as dairy and beef cattle, goats, horses, ponies, sheep, hogs, poultry, game birds, dogs, deer, rabbits, mink, and bees . C. livestock products such as milk, butter, cheese, eggs, meat, fur, and honey. This term does not include the use of land as a commercial feed lot or for processing any agricultural product . 3 . "Airport or Heliport" - Any land or structure which is principally used or intended for use for the landing and takeoffs of aircraft, and any land or structure accessory thereto. 4. "Alley" - A public right-of-way which affords a secondary means of access to abutting property. 5 . "Area Identification Sign" - See "Sign, Area Identification" . 6. "Basement" - A portion of a building located wholly or partially below grade. 7. "Bed and Breakfast Inn" - A building in which lodging and meals are provided for compensation and which is open to the traveling public for a stay not to exceed thirty (3 0) days. 8. "Bluff" - A topographic feature wholly or partially within the shoreland overlay zone rising at least 25 feet above the ordinary high water level of the waterbody and having an average grade from the toe of the bluff to a point at least 25 feet above the ordinary high water level of at least 30 percent and which slope drains toward the waterbody. The term does not include any area which has an average slope of less than 18 percent over a distance of 50 feet or more. 9 . "Building" - Any structure having a roof which may provide shelter or enclosure for persons, animals, or things . 10 . "Business Complex" - A building or group of connected buildincs containing two or more businesses . 11. "Church" - Any establishment, together with its accessory structures and uses, in which persons regularly assemble for religious worship and which is maintained and controlled by a religious body organized to sustain public worship. 12 . "Class I Restaurant" - See "Restaurant, Class I" . 13 . "Class II Restaurant" - See "Restaurant, Class II" . 14 . "Clinic" - Any establishment where human patients are examined or treated by licensed practitioners not involving overnight stays . For this purpose, licensed practitioners includes physicians, dentists, osteopaths, chiropractors, optometrists, psychologists, therapists, and physical therapists . 15. "Club" - Any establishment operated for social, recreational or educational purposes open only to members and not to the general public. 16. "Commercial Recreation" A. Major - A structure or open space designed, constructed and operated by private enterprise for recreational purposes and open to the general public. The minimum area shall be 150 acres on either one lot or contiguous parcels under one ownership, in which 50% of the lot or parcels are permanently developed. The facility shall abut a street designated in the Comprehensive Plan as a principal arterial, minor arterial, or collector street . Such facilities may include amusement parks, Class A licensed horse racetracks and similar enterprises. B. Minor - A structure or open space designed, constructed, and operated by private enterprise for recreational purposes and open to the general public. The facility must meet the minimum lot size of the zone. Minor commercial recreation facilities shall be all commercial recreation facilities which do not meet the standards of a major commercial recreation facility. Such facilities may include bowling alleys, tennis courts, campgrounds, and similar uses. 17 . "Commercial Vehicle" - See "Vehicle, Commercial" . 18 . "Comprehensive Plan" - The compilation of the goals, policy statements, standards, programs and maps for guiding the physical, social and economic development, both public and private, of the City and its environs, as most recently adopted by the City Council and approved by the Metropolitan Council . The term includes any unit or part of such plan and any amendment thereto. 19 . "Conditional Use" - See "Use, Conditional" . 20 . "Corner Lot" - See "Lot, Corner" . 21. "Day Care Facility" - A facility licensed by the State of Minnesota to provide care for a child outside of the child' s own home for gain or otherwise, on a regular basis, for any part of a 24-hour day. For this purpose, a child is a person who is under 18 years of age. 22 . "Detached Dwelling" - See "Dwelling, Detached" . 23 . "Directional Sign" - See "Sign, Directional" . 24 . "Dwelling" - A building or portion thereof designed for residential purposes and providing complete living facilities for one family. 25 . "Dwelling, Detached" - A dwelling unit having open space on all sides. 26. "Dwelling, Single-Family" - A building designed for and occupied exclusively by one family. 27 . "Dwelling, Two-Family" - A building designed for and occupied exclusively by no more than two families living independently of each other. 28. "Dwelling, Multiple-Family" - A building designed for and occupied exclusively by three or more families living independently of each other. 29 . "Easement" - A grant by a property owner of the use of land by the public or appurtenant to another property for a specific purpose or purposes. 30. "Existing" - Any structure or use which was in place or for which a building permit had been issued, and any lot which had been preliminarily platted, as of the effective date of this Chapter. In order to have an existing lot for a two-family dwelling, the lot must have two sanitary sewer stubs. 31. "Exterior Storage" or "Open Storage" - The storage of goods, materials, equipment, manufactured products, or similar items, not fully enclosed by a building, on a 24-hour-a-day basis for at least 7 days per year. 32 . "Family" - Any number of individuals related by blood, marriage, or adoption, or up to four individuals not so related living together as a single housekeeping unit . 33 . "Fence" - Any partition, structure, wall or gate erected as a dividing marker, barrier or enclosure and located along a property boundary, or within a lot . 34 . "Flood" - A temporary increase in the flow or stage of a stream or in the stage of a wetland or lake which results in the inundation of normally dry areas . 35. "Flood Frequency" - The frequency for which it is expected that a specific flood state or discharge may be equalled or exceeded. 36. "Flood Fringe" - That portion of the flood plain outside of the floodway. Flood fringe is synonymous with the term "floodway fringe" used in the flood insurance study for the City. 37 . "Flood Plain" - The bed of a wetland or lake, or the channel of a watercourse, and areas adjoining the bed or channel, which have been or hereafter may be covered by the regional flood. 38. "Flood Proofing" - A combination of structural provisions, changes, or adjustments to properties and structures subject to flooding primarily for the reduction or elimination of flood damages. 39 . "Floodway" - The bed of a wetland or lake and the channel of the watercourse and those portions of the adjoining flood plain which are reasonably required to carry or store the regional flood discharge. 40. "Floor Area" - The sum of the gross horizontal areas of the several floors of the building measured from the exterior faces of the exterior walls. The term shall include basements but not porches, balconies, breezeways, or attic areas having a head room of less than 7 feet 6 inches. 41. "Floor Area Ratio" - The numerical value obtained through dividing the floor area of a building by the area of the lot or parcel of land on which such building is located. 42 . "Free Standing Sign" - See "Sign, Free Standing" . 43 . "Frontage" - That boundary of a lot which abuts an existing or dedicated street . 44 . "Front Lot Line" - See "Lot Line, Front" . 45 . "Front Yard" - See "Yard, Front" . 46 . "Garage" - Ar. accessory building or portion of a principal building, which is used primarily for storing personal vehicles. 47 . "Government Sign" - See "Sign, Government" . 48 . "Group Family Day Care Facility" - Any facility licensed by the State to provide day care for no more than 14 children at any one time, including all children of the care giver when the children are present at the facility. For this purpose, children are persons who are under 18 years of age. 49 . "Height" - For a building, height is the vertical distance between the ground and the top of the cornice of a flat roof, a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, or one-half the distance between the lowest eave in the highest roof section and the top of the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof . For any other structure, height shall be the vertical distance between the ground and the highest point of the structure. For new construction, the ground level shall be the original or pre-construction average ground elevation adjoining the structure' s footprint; for existing construction, the ground level shall be the average ground elevation of the structure. 50. "Home Occupation" - Any gainful occupation or profession engaged in by the occupant of a dwelling at or from the dwelling when carried on within a dwelling unit or an accessory building. 51. "Hotel" - A building, other than a bed and breakfast inn, used as a temporary residence by the travelling public, in which ingress and egress to and from all rooms is made through an inside lobby. 52 . "Illuminated Sign" - See "Sign, Illuminated" . 53 . "Impervious Surface Percentage" - The area of any lot covered by material which is impervious to penetration by water, divided by the total lot area. 54. "Institutional Sign" - See "Sign, Institutional" . 55. "Interior Lot" - See "Lot, Interior" . 56 . "Junkyard" - Any area where used, waste, discarded, or salvage materials are bought, sold, exchanged, stored, baled, cleaned, patched, disassembled, or handled; including scrap iron and other metals, paper, rags, rubber products, bottles, and used construction materials, but excluding refuse or the storage of material in conjunction with construction or a manufacturing process . 57 . "Landscaping" - Plantings such as trees, grass, or shrubs . 58. "Loading Space" - A space accessible from a street, alley, or driveway for the use of vehicles while loading or unloading merchandise or materials . 59 . "Lot" - An area, parcel, or tract of land which was created or is recognized as a lot under Chapter 12 of the City Code. 60 . "Lot Area" - The area of a lot on a horizontal plane bounded by the lot lines, excluding dedicated rights- of-way. ights- of-way. 61. "Lot, Corner" - A lot situated at the junction of, and abutting on two or more intersecting streets, or a lot at the point of deflection in alignment of a continuous street, the interior angle of which does not exceed 135 degrees. 62 . "Lot Depth" - The mean horizontal distance between the front lot line and the rear lot line . 63 . "Lot, Interior" - A lot other than a corner lot . 64 . "Lot Line" - A line bounding a lot, except that where any portion of a lot extends into a public right-of-way, the line of such public right-of-way shall be the lot line. 65. "Lot Line, Front" - The boundary of a lot which abuts a right-of-way. In the case of a corner lot, the term shall mean the shortest dimension abutting a right-of- way. For any lot other than a corner lot which abuts more than one street, all boundaries abutting and . parallel to the streets shall be front lot lines . 66. "Lot Line, Rear" - The boundary of a lot which is opposite or most distant from the front lot line. 67 . "Lot Line, Side" - Any boundary of a lot which is not a front lot line or a rear lot line. 68. "Lot Width" - The horizontal distance between the side lot lines of a lot measured parallel to the front lot line and at the building setback line . 69 . "Manufactured Home" - Any structure, transportable in one or more sections, which in the traveling mode, is eight body feet or more in width or 40 body feet or more in length, or, when erected on site, is 320 or more square feet, and which is built on a permanent chassis and designed to be used as a dwelling with or without a permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities, and includes the plumbing, heating, air conditioning, and electrical systems contained therein. 70 . "Mining" - The extraction of sand, gravel, rock, soil or other material from the land exceeding 1000 cubic yards and the removing thereof from the site without processing. The term shall not include removal of materials associated with construction of a building or grading of a subdivision, provided such removal is an approved item in the building permit. 71. "Motel" - A building or group of buildings other than a hotel or bed and breakfast inn used as a temporary residence by the traveling public. 72 . "Multiple-Family Dwelling" - See "Dwelling, Multiple- Family" . 73 . "Mural Sign" - See "Sign, Mural" . 74 . "Nameplate Sign" - See "Sign, Nameplate" . 75 . "Nonconformity" - Any land, use, or structure lawfully existing on the effective date of this Chapter which does not comply with all the requirements of this Chapter or any amendments hereto governing the zone in which such land, use, or structure is located. 76. "Non-Riparian" - Not located on the bank of a natural watercourse. 77 . "Noxious Matter" - Matter capable of causing injury to living organisms by chemical reaction, or capable of causing detrimental effects on the physical or economic well-being of individuals . 78. "Nursing Home" - Any institution or facility required to be licensed as such by the Minnesota Commissioner of Health under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 144A. 79. "Obstruction" - Any dam, wall, wharf, embankment, levee, dike, pile, abutment, projection, excavation, channel modification, culvert, building, wire, fence, stockpile, refuse, fill, structure, or other matter in, along, across, or projecting into any channel, watercourse, cr regulatory flood plain which may impede, retard, or change the direction of the flow of water, either in itself or by catching or collecting debris carried by such water. 80 . "Opaque" - At least eighty percent (80%) of the view from the opposite side is blocked, when observed from a point perpendicular to the opaque material, fence, or wall . 81. "Open Sales Lot" - Land devoted to the display of goods for sale, rent, trade, or advertising purposes, where such goods are not enclosed within a building, on a 24- hour-a-day basis for at least 7 days per year. 82 . "Open Storage" - See "Exterior Storage" . 83 . "Ordinary High Water Level" - The boundary of public waters or wetlands at an elevation delineated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as the highest water level which has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the landscape, commonly that point where the natural vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly terrestrial . For watercourses, the ordinary high water level is the elevation of the top of the bank of the channel . For reservoirs and flowages, the ordinary high water level is the operating elevation of the normal summer pool . 84. "Overlay Zone" - See "Zone, Overlay" . 85. "Parking Space" - A suitably surfaced and permanently maintained area on privately owned property, either within a building or outside. 86 . "Performance Standards" - Criteria established to control noise, odor, dust, fumes, toxic or noxious matter, vibration, fire or explosive hazards, glare, heat, or other characteristics generated by or inherent in uses of land or structures . 87 . "Permitted Use" - See "Use, Permitted" . 88 . "Personal Vehicle" - See "Vehicle, Personal" . 89 . "Planned Unit Development" - A process used to acquire approvals for a project or development which requires the preparation of plans as specified herein and, upon approval of said plans by the City, establishes the land use pattern; the density or intensity of use; yard, lot coverage, landscaping, building height and spacing requirements; the architectural character of the project; pedestrian and vehicular system locations; outdoor storage; loading, signage, parking and open space recsirements and locations; and such other requirements as are deemed necessary and appropriate for the area encompassed by the planned unit development . 90 . "Portable Sign" - See "Sign, Portable" . 91. "Principal Use" - See "Use, Principal" . 92 . "Public Building" - Any structure sheltering or enclosing a governmental use or activity. 93 . "Public Information Sign" - See "Sign, Public Information" . 94. "Public Recreation" - Any use commonly provided for and open to the public at parks, playgrounds, community centers cr other similar sites owned or operated by a unit of Government for the purpose of providing recreation. 95. "Reach" - A longitudinal segment of a stream or river influenced by a natural or human-made obstruction. 96. "Rear Lot Line" - See "Lot Line, Rear" . 97. "Rear Yard" - See "Yard, Rear" . 98. "Recreational Equipment" - Any structure, device or furnishing used for recreational purposes which is not larger than 600 square feet or 4000 cubic feet including, but not limited to swing sets and slides, sandboxes, picnic tables, jungle gyms and similar items. 99. "Recreational Vehicle" - See "Vehicle, Recreational" . 100. "Regional Flood" - A flood which is representative of large floods known to have occurred generally in Minnesota and reasonably characteristic of what can be expected to occur on an average frequency in the magnitude of the 100-year recurrence interval . Regional flood is synonymous with the term "base flood" used in the flood insurance study for the City. 101. "Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation" - The elevation no lower than one foot above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the flood plain that result from designation of a floodway. 102 . "Residential Facility" - A facility licensed by the State of Minnesota to provide 24-hour-a-day care, supervision, food, lodging, rehabilitation, training, education, habilitation or treatment outside a person' s own home . For this purpose, a person is any individual under 18 years of age cr an individual who is 18 years of age or older and who has mental illness, mental retardation or a related condition, a physical handicap or a functional impairment or who is chemically dependent or abuses chemicals . 103 . "Restaurant, Class I" - An establishment serving food to customers while seated at a counter or table and which does not serve alcoholic beverages or provide live entertainment . 104 . "Restaurant, Class II" - An establishment serving food to customers which is not a Class I restaurant . 105. "Retail" - The sale of goods or services directly to the ultimate consumer. 106 . "Riparian" - Located on the bank of a natural watercourse . 107 . "Sandwich Board Sign" - See "Sign, Free Standing" . 108 . "Setback" - The minimum horizontal distance between a structure and a lot line, ordinary high water level, or other specified item. 109 . "Shoreland" - Land located within the following distances from public waters: 1, 000 feet from the ordinary high water level of a lake, pond or flowage; or 300 feet from a river or stream, or the landward extent of a floodplain designated by ordinance on such a river or stream, whichever is greater. The limits of the shoreland may be reduced whenever the waters involved are bounded by natural topographic divides which extend landward from the water for lesser distances and when approved by the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 110 . "Side Lot Line" - See "Lot Line, Side" . 111. "Side Yard" - See "Yard, Side" . 112. "Sign" - Any letter, work, symbol, device, poster, picture, statuary, reading matter or representation in the nature of an advertisement, announcement, message or visual communication whether painted, pasted, printed, affixed or constructed which is displayed in view of the general public for informational or communicative purpose. 113 . "Sign Area" - The entire area within a single continuc•_:s parallelogram enclosing the exterior limits of the message area . Where the sign is double faced, the sign area shall be the maximum area visible from any one direction. The supports, uprights or structures on which any sign is supported shall not be part of the sign area unless such supports, uprights or structures are an integral part of the display or sign. 114 . "Sign, Area Identification" - A free standing sign, located at the entrance to or within the identified premises, which identifies the name of a neighborhood, residential subdivision, multiple-family residential complex, shopping center or area, industrial area, office complex, planned unit development, or any combination of the above, but which does not advertise any business within the area. 115. "Sign, Directional" - A sign erected on private property for the purpose of directing vehicular and pedestrian traffic to facilities or functions open to the general public . 116 . "Sign, Free Standing" - A sign which is placed in the ground and not affixed to any part of any structure. A free standing sign may be of any of the following types : A. "Free Standing Pylon Sign" - A sign which is mounted on free standing shafts, posts, or walls which extend more than seven feet in height and are attached to the ground. B. "Free Standing Ground Sign" - A sign which is mounted on free standing shafts, posts or walls which are seven feet or less in height and are attached to the ground. C. "Sandwich Board Sign" - A sign which has two single face areas that are attached on only one end so as to create a triangular stance, but which is not permanently affixed to the ground. 117 . "Sign, Government" - A sign which is erected by or with the approval of a governmental unit . 118 . "Sign, Illuminated" - A sign which has an artificial light source directed upon it or one which has an interior light source. 119 . "Sign, Institutional" - A sign or bulletin board which identifies the name and other characteristics of a public or private institution on the site where the sign is located. 120 . "Sign, Mural" - Any mural or pictorial scene painted or attached on :he wall of a structure or painted on a sign board affixed to a wall, and which has as its primary purpcse artistic effect and an ideological or noncommercial message . 121. "Sign, Nameplate" - A sign indicating the name of a building, building occupant, development, project, or any sign which serves as a directory of building occupants . 122 . "Sign, Portable" - A sign so designed as to be movable from one location to another and which is not permanently attached to the ground or any structure . 123 . "Sign, Public Information" - A sign designating time, temperature cr similar non-advertising public information. 124 . "Sign, Temporary" - Any sign intended to be displayed for a limited period of time only. 125 . "Sign, Wall" - Any sign which is attached or affixed to the exterior wall of any building, and projects from the wall 18 inches or less. 126 . "Sign, Window" - A sign attached to, placed upon, or painted on the interior or exterior of a window or door of a building and which is intended for viewing from the exterior of such building. 127 . "Single-Family Dwelling" - See "Dwelling, Single- Family" . 128 . "Street" - A public right-of-way affording primary access by pedestrians and vehicles to abutting properties . 129 . "Structure" - Anything constructed or erected, the use of which requires a location on, below or above, the ground, or attached to something having a location on the ground, including signs and fences. 130 . "Subdivision" - The creation of one or more lots under the provisions of Chapter 12 . 131. "Tavern" - An establishment where a majority of customers order, are served, and consume alcoholic beverages. 132 . "Temporary Sign" - See "Sign, Temporary" . 133 . "Toe of the Bluff" - The lower point of a 50-foot segment with an average slope exceeding 18 percent. 134 . "Top of the Bluff" - The higher point of a 50-foot segment with an average slope exceeding 18 percent . 135 . "Two-Family Dwelling" - See "Dwelling, Two-Family" . 136. "Use" - The purpose or activity for which the land or structure thereon is designated, arranged, or intended, or for which it is occupied or maintained. 137 . "Use, Accessory" - A use or structure subordinate to and serving the principal use or structure on the same lot and customarily incidental thereto. 138. "Use, Conditional" - A use which is generally permitted within the zone, but which requires special review and limitations because if not carefully located or designed may have a detrimental impact on neighboring properties or the City. 139 . "Use, Permitted" - A use which may be lawfully established in a zone provided it conforms with all requirements, regulations, and performance standards of such zone. 140. "Use, Principal" - The main use of land or a structure, as distinguished from a subordinate or accessory use. 141. "Utility Services" - Underground or overhead gas, electrical, steam, or water transmission or distribution systems; collection, communication, supply or disposal systems including poles, wires, mains, drains, sewers, pipes, lift stations, conduits, cables, fire alarm boxes, police call boxes, traffic signals, fire hydrants, or other similar equipment and accessories in conjunction therewith; but not including buildings, electrical stations and substations, and water storage reservoirs. 142 . "Utility Service Structures" - Any building or large structure necessary for the operation of public or private utility services, including, but not limited to, telephone buildings, telephone booths, gas regulator stations, water tanks or towers, electrical stations or substations, and water storage reservoirs. 143 . "Variance" - A modification or relaxation of the provisions of this Chapter where it is determined that by reason of special and unusual circumstances relating to a specific lot, that strict application of this Chapter would cause an undue hardship, or that strict conformity with the provisions of this Chapter would be unreasonable, impractical or unfeasible under the circumstances. 144 . "Vehicle" - Any device in, upon, or by wh:ch any person or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a street, except devices used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks. 145 . "Vehicle, Commercial" - Any vehicle other than a personal vehicle or recreational vehicle . 146 . "Vehicle, Personal" - Any self-propelled vehicle designed and used for the carrying of not more than 15 persons including the driver, truck with a rated carrying capacity of one ton or less, motorcycle, or motorbike . 147 . "Vehicle, Recreational" - Any self-propelled vehicle or vehicle propelled or drawn by a self-propelled vehicle used for recreational purposes, including but not limited to RV' s, campers, snowmobiles, trail bikes, or other all-terrain vehicles, boats, hovercrafts, or motor vehicles licensed for highway operation which may be used for off-road recreational purposes . 148 . "Wall Sign" - See "Sign, Wall" . 149 . "Wetland" - Land transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table is usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water, as defined in Minn. Stat . Sec. 103G. 005, Subd. 19 . 150. "Wholesale" - The sale of goods to an intermediary for resale to another intermediary or to the ultimate consumer. 151. "Window Sign" - See "Sign, Window" . 152 . "Yard" - An open space on a lot surrounding a principal structure, which is unoccupied and unobstructed from the ground to the sky, except by landscaping or an eave not exceeding 24 inches in width. 153 . "Yard, Front" - The yard extending the width of the lot from the front lot line to the building setback line. 154. "Yard, Rear" - The yard extending the width of the lot extending from the rear lot line to the rear yard setback line. 155. "Yard, Side" - The yard extending along the side lot line between the front and rear yards, extending perpendicularly from the side lot line to the side yard setback line. 156. "Zone" - An area or areas within the City for which the regulations and requirements of this Chapter governing uses, lot and bulk of structures and premises are uniform. 157 . "Zone, Overlay" - A zone whose regulations and requirements are added to the regulations and requirements of another zone, in order to address particular topographic or development concerns . 158 . "Zoning Administrator" - The duly appointed person charged with enforcement of this Chapter, or that person' s designee. 159 . "Zoning Amendment" - A change authorized by the City Council in the text of this Chapter or in the boundaries of a zone. SEC. 11. 03 . ZONING MAP. Subd. 1. Adopted. The zoning map is appended to this Chapter and is hereby adopted by reference as though shown in all details herein. The boundaries of the zones are established as shown on the zoning map. The zoning map shall be kept on file in the office of the Zoning Administrator and shall be referred to as the "zoning map" . The map and all of the notations, references and other information shown thereon shall have the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. All subsequent changes in zoning shall be shown on the zoning map. Subd. 2 . Governs. All property within the City shall have the zoning designation shown on the zoning map. If there is any discrepancy or inconsistency between the zoning map and any other map, ordinance, or source which purports to indicate the zoning of property, the zoning map shall take precedence . Subd. 3 . Intention. Zone boundary lines shown on the zoning map are intended to follow lot lines, the centerlines of streets or alleys, the centerlines of streets or alleys projected, the centerlines of railroad rights-of-way, the center of watercourses, or the corporate limits of the City, unless otherwise indicated. Where a zone boundary line divides a lot which was in single ownership at the time of enactment of this Chapter and places portions of such lot in two or more zones, any portion of such lot within 50 feet on either side of the dividing zone boundary line may be used for any use allowed in either zone; provided, however, if any portion of such lot shall extend beyond the 50-foot limitation, the zone line as shown shall prevail . Subd. 4. Floodplain Overlay Zone. The boundaries of the floodplain overlay zone shall be determined by scaling distances on the zoning map. Where interpretation is needed as to the exact location of the boundaries of the zone, or where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions, the zoning administrator shall make the necessary interpretation. All decisions will be based on elevations on the regional (100-year) flood profile and other available technical data. Subd. 5. Interpretation. The Zoning Administrator shall interpret the zoning map and the exact location of the zone boundary lines by reference to evidence of the intent of the City Council . Any party aggrieved by an interpretation of the Zoning Administrator under this section may appeal the Zoning Administrator' s decision to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals as outlined in Sec. 11 . 90 of this Chapter. Subd. 6 . Annexation. The zoning designation of any area annexed to the City shall remain the same as approved by the governing body with previous jurisdiction over the annexed area, and shall remain in force until modified by the City Council . SECTIONS 11 . 04 - 11 . 19 . Reserved. SEC. 11.20 . ZONES . For the purpose of this Chapter, the City is hereby divided into the following zones : Agricultural ?reservation (AG) Rural Residential (RR) Low Density Residential (R-1A) Urban Residential (R-1B) Old Shakopee Residential (R-1C) Medium Density Residential (R-2) Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) Highway Business (3-1) Office Business (3-2) Central Business (3-3) Major Recreation (MR) Light Industry (I-1) Heavy Industry (I-2) Planned Unit Development Overlay (PUD) Mining Overlay (MIN) Shoreland Overlay (SH) Floodplain Overlay (FP) Old Shakopee Business Overlay (B-1C) Unless the context clearly indicates to the contrary, reference in this Chapter to residential zones includes AG, RR, R-1A, R-1B, R-1C, R-2, and R-3 ; reference to business zones includes B-1, B-2, B-3 , and MR; and reference to industry zones includes I-1 and I-2 . SEC. 11.21. Reserved. SEC. 11.22 . AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ZONE (AG) . Subd. 1 . Purpose. The purpose of the agricultural preservation zone is to preserve and promote agriculture in the unsewered areas of the City which are suitable for such use, to prevent scattered and leap-frog non-farm growth, and to prevent premature expenditures for such public services as roads, sewer, water, and police and fire protection. Subd. 2 . Permitted Uses. Within the agricultural preservation zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses : A. agricultural uses; B. single family detached dwellings; C. forestry and nursery uses; D. seasonal produce stands; E. kennels . A kennel is any premise in which more than two domestic animals, over six months of age, are boarded, bred or offered for sale; F. riding academies; G. utility services; H. public recreation; I. public buildings; J. day care facilities serving 12 or fewer persons; K. group family day care facilities serving 14 or fewer children; or L. residential facilities serving six (6) or fewer persons. Subd. 3 . Conditional Uses. Within the agricultural preservation zone, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit : A. commercial feedlots, which include yards, lots, pens, buildings, or other areas or structures used for the confined feeding of livestock or other animals for food, fur, pleasure, or resale purposes; B. home occupations; C. retail sales of nursery and garden supplies; D. cemeteries; E. churches and other places of worship; F. agricultural research facilities, which are facilities specifically operated for the purpose of conducting research in the production of agricultural crops, including research aimed at developing plant varieties . This term specifically excludes research regarding the development or research of soil conditioners, fertilizers, or other chemical additives placed in or on the soil or for the experimental raising of animals; G. animal hospitals and veterinary clinics; H. public or private schools having a course of instruction approved by the Minnesota Department of Education for students enrolled in K through grade 12, or any portion thereof; I. commercial recreation, minor; J. utility service structures; K. day care facilities serving 13 through 16 persons; L. residential facilities serving from 7 through 16 persons; M. wind energy conversion systems or windmills; N. relocated structures; O. structures over 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet in height; P. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot; or Q. other uses similar to those permitted in this subdivision, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Subd. 4. Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the agricultural preservation zone the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses: A. machinery and structures necessary to the conduct of agricultural operations; B. garages; C. fences; D. recreational equipment; E. stables; F. swimming pools; G. solar equipment; H. tennis courts; I. receive only satellite dish antennas and other antenna devices; or J. other accessory uses, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 5 . Design Standards. Within the agricultural preservation zone, no land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following minimum requirements : A. Density: one dwelling per 40 acres . B. Lot specifications : Minimum lot width: 1000 feet . Minimum lot depth: 1000 feet. Minimum front yard setback: 100 feet . Minimum side yard setback: 20 feet . Minimum rear yard setback: 40 feet . C. Maximum height: 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet . Grain elevators, barns, silos, and elevator lags may exceed this limitation without a conditional use permit . Subd. 6. Additional Requirements. A. All dwellings shall have a depth of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their width. All dwellings shall have a width of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their depth. B. All dwellings shall have a permanent foundation in conformance with the Minnesota State Building Code. SEC. 11.23 . Reserved. SEC. 11 .24 . RURAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE (RR) . Subd. 1 . Purpose. The purpose of the rural residential zone is to allow low-density residential development in areas which are not served by municipal urban services . Subd. 2 . Permitted Uses. Within the rural residential zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses : A. single family detached dwellings; B. agricultural uses; C. forestry and nursery uses; D. utility services; E. public recreation; F. public buildings; G. day care facilities serving 12 or fewer persons; H. group family day care facilities serving 14 or fewer children; or I. residential facilities serving six (6) or fewer persons. Subd. 3 . Conditional Uses. Within the rural residential zone, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit : A. churches and other places of worship; B. home occupations; C. cemeteries; D. commercial recreation, minor; E. seasonal produce stands when the principal use of the property is agricultural; F. public or private schools having a course of instruction approved by the Minnesota Department of Education for students enrolled in K through grade 12, or any portion thereof; G. kennels. A kennel is any premise in which more than two domestic animals, over six months of age, are boarded, bred, or offered for sale; H. riding academies; I. utility service structures; J. day care facilities serving 13 through 16 persons; K. residential facilities serving from 7 through 16 persons; L. wind energy conversion systems or windmills; M. relocated structures; N. structures over 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet in height; 0. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot; or P. other uses similar to those permitted in this subdivision, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Subd. 4 . Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the rural residential zone, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses : A. garages; B. fences; C. gardening and other horticultural uses not involving retail sales; D. one lodging room per single family dwelling; B. recreational equipment; F. machinery and structures necessary to the conduct of agricultural operations; G. stables with not more than two horses per 2-1/2 acre; H. swimming pools; I. solar equipment; J. receive only satellite dish antennas and other antenna devices; K. tennis courts; or L. other accessory uses, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 5. Design Standards. Within the rural residential zone, no land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following minimum requirements : A. Density: one dwelling per 10 acres . B. Maximum impervious surface percentage: 30% C. Lot specifications : Minimum lot width: 150 feet Minimum lot depth: 200 feet Minimum front yard setback: 50 feet . Minimum side yard setback: 20 feet . Minimum rear yard setback: 40 feet . Setback for accessory machinery and buildings necessary to the conduct of agricultural operations : 100 feet from all lot lines . D. Maximum height : No structure shall exceed two and one-half (2-1/2) stories or thirty-five (35) feet in height without a conditional use permit . Subd. 6. Additional Requirements. A. All dwellings shall have a depth of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their width. All dwellings shall have a width of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their depth. B. All dwellings shall have a permanent foundation in conformance with the Minnesota State Building Code. SEC. 11.25. Reserved. SEC. 11.26 . LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R-1A) . Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the low density residential zone is to allow large-lot single family development in areas of the City served by sanitary sewer and water. Subd. 2 . Permitted Uses. Within the low density residential zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses : A. single family detached dwellings; B. public recreation; C. utility services; D. public buildings; E. day care facilities serving 12 or fewer persons; F. group family day care facilities serving 14 or fewer children; or G. residential facilities serving six (6) or fewer persons. Subd. 3 . Conditional Uses. Within the low density residential zone, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit : A. churches and other places of worship; B. home occupations; C. public or private schools having a course of instruction approved by the Minnesota Department of Education for students enrolled in K through grade 12, or any portion thereof; D. utility service structures; E. day care facilities serving 13 through 16 persons; F. residential facilities serving from 7 through 16 persons; G. structures over 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet in height; H. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot; or I. other uses similar to those permitted in this subdivision, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals . Subd. 4 . Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the low density residential zone, to following uses shall be permitted accessory uses : A. garages; B. fences; C. recreational equipment; D. gardening and other horticultural uses not involving retail sales; E. swimming pools; F. tennis courts; G. solar equipment; or H. other accessory uses, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 5. Design Standards. Within the low density residential zone, no land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following minimum requirements : A. Density: one dwelling per 15, 000 square feet . B. Maximum impervious surface percentage : 50% C. Lot specifications : Minimum lot width: 80 feet Minimum lot depth: 160 feet Minimum front yard setback: 35 feet . Minimum side yard setback: 15 feet . Minimum rear yard setback: 40 feet. D. Maximum height : No structure shall exceed two and one-half (2-1/2) stories or thirty-five (35) feet in height without a conditional use permit. Subd. 6. Additional Requirements. A. All dwellings shall have a depth of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their width. All dwellings shall have a width of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their depth. B. All dwellings shall have a permanent foundation in conformance with the Minnesota State Building Code. SEC. 11.27 . Reserved. SEC. 11 .28 . URBAN RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R-1B) . Subd. 1 . Purpose. The purpose of the urban residential zone is to provide an area for residential development where public sanitary sewer and water are available . Subd. 2 . Permitted Uses . Within the urban residential zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses : A. single family detached dwellings; B. existing single family attached dwellings; C. existing two family dwellings; D. public recreation; E. utility services; F. public buildings; G. day care facilities serving 12 or fewer persons; H. group family day care facilities serving 14 or fewer children; or I. residential facilities serving six (6) or fewer persons. Subd. 3 . Conditional Uses. Within the urban residential zone, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit : A. churches and other places of worship; B. home occupations; C. cemeteries; D. public or private schools having a course of instruction approved by the Minnesota Board of Education for students enrolled in K through grade 12, or any portion thereof; E. bed and breakfast inns; F. utility service structures; G. day care facilities serving 13 through 16 persons; H. residential facilities servicing from 7 through 16 persons; I. relocated structures; J. structures over 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet in height; K. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot; or L. other uses similar to those permitted by this subdivision, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Subd. 4 . Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the urban residential zone, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses : A. garages; B. fences; C. recreation equipment; D. gardening and other horticultural uses not involving retail sales; B. swimming pools; F. tennis courts; G. solar equipment; or H. other accessory uses, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 5. Design Standards. Within the urban residential zone, no land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following minimum requirements: A. Density: one single family dwelling per 9, 000 square feet; one existing two-family dwelling per 11, 000 square feet. B. Maximum impervious surface percentage: 500 C. Lot specifications : Minimum lot width (single-family detached) : 60 feet; (existing two-family dwelling) : 70 feet Minimum lot depth: 100 feet Minimum front yard setback: 30 feet Minimum side yard setback: 10 feet Minimum rear yard setback: 30 feet D. Maximum height : No structure shall exceed two and one-half (2-1/2) stories or thirty-five (35) feet in height without a conditional use permit . Subd. 6 . Additional Requirements. A. All dwellings shall have a depth of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their width. All dwellings shall have a width of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their depth. B. All dwellings shall have a permanent foundation in conformance with the Minnesota State Building Code . SEC. 11.29 . Reserved. SEC. 11.30 . OLD SHAKOPEE RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R-1C) . Subd. 1 . Purpose. The purpose of the Old Shakopee residential zone is to provide an area for the continuation of existing residential development and development of existing lots in the older residential areas where public sanitary sewer and water are available . The combination of small lots is encouraged. Subd. 2 . Permitted Uses. Within the Old Shakopee residential zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses : A. single family detached dwellings; B. single family attached dwellings, up to a maximum of two dwellings; C. two family dwellings; D. public recreation; E. utility services; F. public buildings; G. day care facilities serving 12 or fewer persons; H. group family day care facilities serving 14 or fewer children; or I. residential facilities serving six (6) or fewer persons . Subd. 3 . Conditional Uses. Within the Old Shakopee residential zone, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit : A. churches and other places of worship; B. home occupations; C. cemeteries; D. hospitals and clinics; E. public or private schools having a course of instruction approved by the Minnesota Board of Education for students enrolled in K through grade 12, or any portion thereof; F. bed and breakfast inns; G. funeral homes; H. utility service structures; I . day care facilities serving 13 through 16 persons; J. residential facilities servicing from 7 through 16 persons; K. relocated structures; L. structures over 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet in height; M. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot; or N. other uses similar to those permitted by this subdivision, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals . Subd. 4 . Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the Old Shakopee residential zone, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses : A. garages; B. fences; C. recreation equipment; D. gardening and other horticultural uses not involving retail sales; B. swimming pools; F. tennis courts; G. solar equipment; or H. other accessory uses, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 5. Design Standards. Within the Old Shakopee residential zone, no land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following minimum requirements : A. Density: one single family dwelling per 6, 000 square feet; one two-family dwelling per 11, 000 square feet . B. Maximum impervious surface percentage: 50% C. Lot specifications : Minimum lot width (single-family detached) : 50 feet; (two-family dwelling) : 70 feet Minimum ict depth: 100 feet Minimum front yard setback: equal to the average setback of other principal structures on the block. If there are fewer than three other existing principal structures on the block, the setback is 30 feet . Minimum street side yard setback: equal to the average street side yard setback of other principal structures on the block. If none exist, the setback is 10 feet . Minimum interior side yard setback: 5 feet; or one side at 3 feet and the other side at 7 feet . Minimum rear yard setback: 30 feet Minimum rear yard setback for accessory structures : 5 feet D. Maximum height : No structure shall exceed two and one-half (2-1/2) stories or thirty-five (35) feet in height without a conditional use permit . Subd. 6. Additional Requirements. A. All dwellings shall have a depth of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their width. All dwellings shall have a width of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their depth. B. All dwellings shall have a permanent foundation in conformance with the Minnesota State Building Code. SEC. 11.31. Reserved. SEC. 11.32 . MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R-2) . Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the medium density residential zone is to provide an area which will allow 2 . 5 to 8 residential dwellings per acre and also provide a transitional zone between single family residential areas and other land uses . Subd. 2 . Permitted Uses. Within the medium density residential zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses : A. residential structures containing two to four dwelling units; B. existing single family dwellings; C. public recreation; D. utility services; E. public buildings; F. day care facilities serving 12 or fewer persons; or G. residential facilities serving six (6) or fewer persons . Subd. 3 . Conditional Uses. Within the medium density residential zone, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit : A. multiple-family dwellings containing up to 6 units; B. home occupations; C. hospitals and clinics; D. cemeteries; E. churches and other places of worship; F. public or private schools having a course of instruction approved by the Minnesota Board of Education for students enrolled in K through grade 12, or any portion thereof; G. nursing homes; H. bed and breakfast inns; I. utility service structures; J. day care facilities serving from 13 through 16 persons; K. residential facilities serving from 7 through 16 persons; relocated structures; M. structures over 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet in height; N. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot; or O. other uses similar to those permitted by this subdivision, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals . Subd. 4 . Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the medium density residential zone, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses : A. open off-street parking spaces not to exceed three spaces per dwelling unit; B. garages; C. fences; D. gardening and other horticultural uses not involving retail sales; E. swimming pools; F. tennis courts; G. receive only satellite dish antennas and other antennas; H. solar equipment; or I. other accessory uses, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 5. Design Standards. Within the medium density residential zone, no land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following minimum requirements: A. Density: one single family dwelling per 9, 000 square feet; one two-family dwelling per 11, 000 square feet; one triplex per 12, 000 square feet; one quadplex per 16, 000 square feet. B. Maximum impervious surface percentage: 60% C. Lot specifications: Minimum lot width (single-family detached) : 60 feet; (two-family dwelling) : 70 feet; (multiple-family dwelling) : 100 feet Minimum lot depth: 100 feet Minimum front yard setback: 35 feet Minimum side yard setback: 10 feet Minimum rear yard setback: 30 feet D. Maximum height : No structure shall exceed two and one-half (2-1/2) stories or thirty-five (35) feet in height without a conditional use permit . Subd. 6 . Additional Requirements. A. All dwellings shall have a depth of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their width. All dwellings shall have a width of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their depth. B. All dwellings shall have a permanent foundation in conformance with the Minnesota State Building Code. SEC. 11.33 . Reserved. SEC. 11 . 34 . MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R-3) . Subd. 1 . Purpose. The purpose of the multiple-family zone is to provide an area which will allow 6 to 18 multiple-family dwelling units per acre, and also provide a transitional zone between single family residential areas and other land uses . Subd. 2 . Permitted Uses . Within the multiple-family residential zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses : A. multiple-family dwellings containing three or more units; B. existing single family and two-family dwellings; C. public recreation; D. utility services; E. public buildings; F. day care facilities serving 12 or fewer persons; or G. residential facilities serving six (6) or fewer persons. Subd. 3 . Conditional Uses. Within the multiple-family residential zone, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit : A. nursing homes; B. churches and other places of worship; C. cemeteries; D. hospitals and clinics; E. public or private schools having a course of instruction approved by the Minnesota Department of Education for students enrolled in K through grade 12, or any portion thereof; F. bed and breakfast inns; G. utility service structures; H. day care facilities serving from 13 through 16 persons; I. residential facilities serving from 7 through 16 persons; J. relocated structures; K. structures over 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet in height; L. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot; or M. other uses similar to those permitted by this subdivision, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals . Subd. 4 . Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the multiple-family residential zone, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses : A. open off-street parking spaces not to exceed three spaces per dwelling unit; B. garages; C. fences; D. gardening and other horticultural uses not involving retail sales; S. swimming pools; F. tennis courts; G. receive only satellite dish antennas and other antennas; H. solar equipment; or I. other uses similar to those permitted by this subdivision, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 5 . Design Standards. Within the multiple-family residential zone, no land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following minimum requirements: A. Density: one single family dwelling per 9, 000 square feet; one two-family dwelling per 11, 000 square feet; one triplex per 12, 000 square feet; one quadplex per 16, 000 square feet. B. Maximum impervious surface percentage: 60% C. Lot specifications: Minimum lot size: 1 acre Minimum lot width: 150 feet Minimum lot depth: 200 feet Minimum front yard setback: 50 feet Minimum side yard setback: One-half of building height or fifteen (15) feet, whichever is greater. All multiple-family residential structures 30 feet or greater in height shall be setback a minimum of four (4) times the height of the structure from the nearest low density residential (R-1A) , urban residential (R-1B) , Old Shakopee residential (R- IC) , medium density residential (R-2) , or multiple- family residential (R-3) zone line. Minimum rear yard setback: 40 feet D. Maximum height : No structure shall exceed two and one-half (2-1/2) stories or thirty-five (35) feet in height without a conditional use permit . Subd. 6 . Additional Requirements. A. All dwellings shall have a depth of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their width. All dwellings shall have a width of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their depth. B. All dwellings shall have a permanent foundation in conformance with the Minnesota State Building Code. SEC. 11.35. Reserved. SEC. 11 .36 . HIGHWAY BUSINESS ZONE (B-1) . Subd. 1 . Purpose. The purpose cf the highway business zone is to provide an area for business uses fronting on or with immediate access to arterial and collector streets . Subd. 2 . Permitted Uses. Within the highway business zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses : A. motels and hotels; B. restaurants, class 1; C. retail establishments; D. utility services; E. administrative, executive and professional offices; F. financial institutions; G. medical or dental clinics; or H. public buildings. Subd. 3 . Conditional Uses. Within the highway business zone, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit : A. taverns; B. churches; C. animal hospitals and veterinary. clinics; D. open sales lots or any use having exterior storage of goods for sale; E. gas stations; F. restaurants, class II; G. private lodges and clubs; H. commercial recreation, major or minor; I. bed and breakfast inns; J. uses having a drive-up or drive-through window; K. vehicle sales, service, or repair; including general repair, rebuilding or reconditioning of engines or vehicles, including body work, frame work and major painting service, replacement of any part or repair of any part, incidental body and fender work, painting or upholstering; L. car washes; M. hospitals; N. theaters; 0. funeral homes; P. utility service structures; Q. day care facilities; R. relocated structures; S. structures over 35 feet in height; T. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot; or U. other uses similar to those permitted in this subdivision, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Subd. 4. Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the highway business zone the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses : A. any incidental repair or processing necessary to conduct a permitted principal use; B. parking and loading spaces; C. temporary construction buildings; D. decorative landscape features; or E. other accessory uses customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 5. Design Standards. Within the highway business zone, no land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following minimum requirements: A. Density: minimum lot area: (new lots) : one acre (existing lots) : 8, 000 square feet maximum floor area ratio: . 50 B. Maximum impervious surface percentage : 75% C. Lot specifications : minimum lot width: (new lots) : 100 feet (existing lots) : 60 feet minimum front yard setback: 30 feet minimum side yard setback: 20 feet minimum rear yard setback: 30 feet minimum side or rear yard setback from residential zones : 75 feet D. Maximum height : 35 feet without a conditional use permit SEC. 11.37 . Reserved. SEC. 11. 38 . OFFICE BUSINESS ZONE (B-2) . Subd. 1 . Purpose. The purpose of the office business zone is to provide an area for offices and related service uses, in an area where general retail is excluded. The zone is intended for areas identified in the comprehensive plan for office use or for transitional areas between residential and more intense uses . Subd. 2 . Permitted Uses. Within the office business zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses : A. administrative, executive and professional offices; B. financial institutions; C. utility services; D. medical or dental clinics; or E. public buildings . Subd. 3 . Conditional Uses. Within the office business zone, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit : A. retail uses generally associated with a permitted use; B. restaurants, class I or class II, contained within a principal structure and oriented toward serving employees or those working in the immediate area; C. storage, assembly, or servicing incidental to a permitted use; D. hotels and motels; E. commercial recreation, minor, but limited to health and athletic facilities; F. hospitals; G. multiple-family housing; H. utility service structures; I. day care facilities; J. relocated structures; R. structures over 55 feet in height; L. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot; or M. other uses similar to those permitted in this subdivision, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals . Subd. 4 . Accessory Uses. Within the office business zone, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses : A. parking and loading spaces; B. temporary construction buildings; C. decorative landscaping features; or D. other accessory uses customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 5 . Desitin Standards. Within the office business zone, no land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following minimum requirements : A. Density: minimum lot area: one acre maximum floor area ratio: . 50 B. Maximum impervious surface percentage: 75% C. Lot specifications : minimum lot width: 100 feet minimum front yard setback: 30 feet minimum side yard setback: 20 feet minimum rear yard setback: 30 feet minimum side or rear yard setback from residential zones : 50 feet D. Maximum height : 55 feet without a conditional use permit SEC. 11.39. Reserved. SEC. 11.40 . CENTRAL BUSINESS ZONE (B-3) . Subd. 1 . Purpose. The purpose of the central business zone is to provide a zone which accommodates the unique character of the central business area in terms of land uses and development patterns . Subd. 2 . Permitted Uses. Within the central business zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses : A. retail establishments; B. public buildings; C. medical or dental clinics; D. utility services; E. dwellings when combined with another permitted use; F. restaurants, class I; G. administrative, executive and professional offices; H. financial institutions; or I. hotels. Subd. 3 . Conditional Uses. Within the central business zone, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit : A. commercial recreation, minor; B. restaurants, class II; C. theaters; D. bus terminals and taxi stands; E. multiple-family dwellings; F. printing or publishing facilities; G. private lodges and clubs; H. parking facilities open to the public; I. animal hospitals and veterinary clinics; J. taverns; K. gas stations; L. uses having a drive-up or drive-through window; M. bed and breakfast inns; N. funeral homes; 0. utility service structures; P. day care facilities; Q. relocated structures; R. structures over 45 feet in height; S. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot; or T. other uses similar to those permitted in this subdivision, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals . Subd. 4 . Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the central business zone the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses : A. any incidental repair or processing necessary to conduct a permitted principal use; B. private garages or off-street parking; C. temporary construction buildings; D. decorative landscape features; or E. other accessory uses customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 5. Design Standards. Within the central business zone, no land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following minimum requirements: A. Density: minimum lot area: 3, 000 square feet maximum floor area ratio: 4 . 0 B. Maximum impervious surface percentage: 100% C. Lot specifications: minimum lot width: 20 feet minimum front yard setback: 0 feet minimum side yard setback: 0 feet minimum rear yard setback: 0 feet D. Maximum height : 45 feet without a conditional use permit SEC. 11.41 . Reserved. SEC. 11.42 . MAJOR RECREATION ZONE (MR) . Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the major recreation zone is to create a high quality environment for large amusement and recreation attractions with a regional draw, with a high degree of land use compatibility and street efficiency. It is further the intent of the zone to protect existing landscape features, to preserve open space, to sensitively integrate development with the natural landscape, and to require the planning of entire land ownerships as a unit rather than permit piecemeal or scattered small developments. Subd. 2 . Permitted Uses. Within the major recreation zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses : A. public recreation; B. restaurants, class I; C. public buildings; or D. utility services . Subd. 3 . Conditional or Planned Unit Development Uses. Within the major recreation zone, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit or planned unit development: A. commercial recreation, major or minor: B. restaurants, class II; C. hotels, motels and conference centers; D. horse care uses including boarding, training, showing, grooming and veterinary clinic facilities; E. retail uses and entertainment facilities; F. administrative, executive, and professional offices; G. health and athletic facilities; H. private lodges and clubs; I. uses having a drive-up or drive-through window; J. utility service structures; K. day care facilities; L. relocated structures; M. structures over the height allowed based on their setback; N. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot; or 0. other uses similar to those permitted in this subdivision, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals . Subd. 4 . Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the major recreation zone, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses : A. parking and loading spaces; B. temporary construction buildings; C. decorative landscape features; or D. other accessory uses customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 5 . Design Standards. Within the major recreation zone, no land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following minimum requirements: A. Density: minimum lot area: Ten acres. B. Maximum impervious surface percentage : 80%. C. Lot specifications : minimum lot width: 300 feet minimum front yard setback: one-half of that structure' s height or 50 feet, whichever is greater minimum side yard setback: one-half of that structure' s height or 25 feet, whichever is greater minimum rear yard setback: one-half of that structure' s height or 30 feet, whichever is greater minimum rear yard setback from residential zones : one- half of that structure' s height or 50 feet, whichever is greater D. Minimum access spacing: County Roads 83 and 16 : No access is allowed other than to public and private streets with a minimum spacing of 600 feet . Shenandoah Drive and any continuation thereof to and including Secretariat Drive; and Fourth Avenue: Street and driveway access points must be separated by a minimum of 300 feet . SEC. 11.43 . Reserved. SEC. 11 .44 . LIGHT INDUSTRY ZONE (I-1) . Subd. 1 . Purpose. The purpose of the light industry zone is to provide an area for industrial, light manufacturing, and office uses which are generally not obtrusive and which serve as a transition between more intensive industrial sites and residential and business land uses . Subd. 2 . Permitted Uses. Within the light industry zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses : A. warehousing and wholesaling conducted entirely within an enclosed building, except those involving a project that fits within one of the Mandatory EIS Categories under Minn. Rules 4410 .4400; B. research laboratories conducted entirely within an enclosed building; C. establishments supplying goods or services primarily to industrial uses; D. agricultural uses, but limited to the growing of field crops; B. utility services; F. utility service structures; G. offices within the principal structure and directly associated with another permitted use; or H. public buildings . Subd. 3 . Conditional Uses. Within the light industry zone, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit : A. manufacturing, fabrication, processing, and assembly operations conducted entirely within an enclosed building, except those involving a project that fits within one of the Mandatory EIS Categories under Minn. Rules 4410 .4400; B. airports and heliports; C. vehicle repair; D. landscaping services and contractors; E. retail sales of products manufactured, fabricated, assembled, or stored on site; F. commercial vehicle rental facilities; G. self-storage facilities; H. industrial or technical training schools; I. restaurants, class I or class II, contained within a principal structure and oriented toward serving employees or those working in the immediate area; J. residences for security personnel; K. day care facilities; L. structures over 45 feet in height; M. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot; or N. other uses similar to those permitted in this subdivision, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Subd. 4 . Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the light industry zone the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses: A. parking and loading spaces; B. temporary construction buildings; C. decorative landscape features; and D. other accessory uses customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 5. Design Standards. Within the light industry zone, no land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following minimum requirements : A. Density: minimum lot area: (with City services) : 1 acre (without City services) : 20 acres B. Maximum impervious surface percentage: 75% C. Lot specifications : minimum lot width: (with City services) : 100 feet (without City services) : 600 feet minimum front yard setback: 30 feet minimum side yard setback: 15 feet minimum rear yard setback: 30 feet minimum side or rear yard setback from residential zones : 100 feet D. Maximum height : 45 feet without a conditional use permit SEC. 11.45 . Reserved. SEC. 11.46 . HEAVY INDUSTRY ZONE (I-2) . Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the heavy industry zone is to provide an area for industrial uses in locations remote from residential uses and in which urban services and adequate transportation exist . Subd. 2 . Permitted Uses. Within the heavy industry zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses : A. motor freight terminals; B. manufacturing, fabrication, processing, assembly and storage operations, except those involving a project that fits within one of the Mandatory EIS Categories under Minn. Rules 4410 .4400; C. warehousing and wholesaling; D. commercial vehicle rental facilities; E. research laboratories, except those involving a project that fits within one of the Mandatory EIS Categories under Minn. Rules 4410 .4400; F. contractors' supply yards; G. retail sales of heavy industrial, manufacturing, or construction machinery or equipment; H. agricultural uses, but limited to the growing of field crops; I. utility services; J. utility service structures; R. landscaping services and contractors; L. establishments supplying goods or services to industrial users; or M. public buildings. Subd. 3 . Conditional Uses. Within the heavy industry zone, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit : A. manufacturing, fabrication, processing, assembly, and storage operations, and research laboratories, that fit within one of the Mandatory EIS Categories under Minn. Rules 4410.4400; B. retail sales of products manufactured, fabricated, assembled, or stored on si:e; C. concrete or asphalt plants ; D. airports and heliports; E. grain elevators; F. junkyards; G. residences for security personnel; H. vehicle repair; I. restaurants, class I or class II, contained within a principal structure and oriented toward serving employees or those working in the immediate area; J. recycling or composting facilities; R. structures over 45 feet in height; L. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot; or M. other uses similar to those permitted in this subdivision, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Subd. 4. Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the heavy industry zone the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses : A. parking and loading spaces; B. temporary construction buildings; C. decorative landscape features; D. offices occupying less than 25 percent of the principal structure and directly associated with a permitted use; or E. other accessory uses customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 5. Desitin Standards. Within the heavy industry zone, no land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following minimum requirements : A. Density: minimum lot area: 1 acre B. Maximum impervious surface percentage: 850 C. Lot specifications : minimum lot width: 100 feet minimum front yard setback: 30 feet minimum side yard setback: 15 feet minimum rear yard setback: 30 feet minimum side or rear yard setback from residential zones : 100 feet minimum side or rear yard setback from railroad right-of- way: 0 feet D. Maximum height : 45 feet without a conditional use permit SECTIONS 11.47 - 11.49 . Reserved. SEC. 11 . 50 . PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE (PUD) . Subd. 1. Purpose. It is the purpose of the planned unit development overlay zone (PU2) to encourage innovation, variety and creativity in site planning and architectural design; to maximize development compatibility; to encourage the planning of large parcels of land as a unit; to provide for greater efficiency in the use of land, streets, and energy; to protect important natural and cultural landscape features; to preserve open space; and to provide quality living, working, shopping, and recreating environments for residents and visitors. Subd. 2 . Areas Covered. A. The planned unit development overlay zone may be applied within any zone. Within areas so designated on the zoning map cf the City, the use of the planned unit development is mandatory and no development shall occur except as a planned unit development . The use of the planned unit development overlay zone in all other areas is optional . B. The Planning Commission may require that any or all contiguous land owned by the applicant be included in a planned unit development when necessary to meet the purpose of this zone. Subd. 3 . Permitted, Conditional, and Accessory Uses. A. Uses permitted in a planned unit development shall be limited to the permitted, conditional, and accessory uses allowed in the underlying zone, except as specifically authorized in the development plan. B. Uses permitted in a planned unit development may consist of one or a mixture of land uses as designated on the approved development plan. The City may place more restrictive conditions on the mixture of uses within a planned unit development to ensure preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare, compliance with the intent of this Chapter, and that land uses occurring within the planned unit development, and between the planned unit development and the surrounding land uses, do not conflict . Subd. 4. Design Standards. A. Density: as specified in the underlying zone unless modified in the development plan. Residential densities may be increased by up to 25 percent above the densities allowed in the underlying zone, if the site is within the metropolitan urban service area. Open space : A planned unit development which includes dwellings shall provide at least twenty (20) percent of the project area as open space . If the planned unit development is to be developed in phases, the applicant must provide the required cpen space proportional to the land area in each phase. Open space is a landscaped area or areas available for the common use of the residents or occupants of the buildings within the planned unit development . Open space does not include any impervious surface areas . The City may grant credits up to 75% against the open space requirement based on proposed amenities . The credits may be granted for any of the following amenities : 1. improvements in the open space for park or recreation purposes, when such space is to be privately owned and maintained; 2 . proof that the applicant is providing amenities desired by the City and of equal social value to open space, such as low-income housing; preservation of natural, cultural, or historic features; or other clear benefit to the public health, safety, or welfare. B. Maximum impervious surface percentage : as specified in the underlying zone, unless modified in the development plan. C. Lot specifications : as set forth in the underlying zone except as modified below. Minimum setbacks : as specified in the underlying zone, except as modified in the development plan. Minimum street yard setback for private streets located entirely within the planned unit development : fifteen (15) feet from the back of the curb line. D. Height : as specified in the underlying zone, unless modified in the development plan. Subd. 6. Additional Requirements. A. All planned unit development sites shall be served by City water and sanitary sewer except in the agricultural preservation (AG) and rural residential (RR) zones. Within the rural residential (RR) zone, private sewer and water services may be allowed by the City Council, built to City and Shakopee Public Utilities specifications, subject to the following conditions: 1. each lot shall be a minimum of one-half acre and shall have two septic sites identified; 2 . easements shall be required over abutting open space with lot lines extended for sewage treatment to supply at least one acre of site area for each residence . Where soil conditions dictate, the applicant shall be required to use alternative systems such as mounds or double tanking; 3 . the planned unit development association shall require annual inspection of all septic systems and corrective action when necessary; and 4 . in order to assure sufficient land for septic systems, at least 70 percent of the lots shall be adjacent to open space . Lots not adjacent to open space shall be at least one acre in size . B. Performance standards shall be as specified in the underlying zone, unless modified in the development plan. No deviation shall be negotiated from the off-street parking requirements . C. No design standards shall be modified in any way which violates or compromises the fire and safety codes of the City. SEC. 11.51. Reserved. SEC. 11 .52 . MINING OVERLAY ZONE (MIN) . Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the mining overlay zone is to provide an area for mining the City' s sand and gravel deposits while recognizing and providing for the long-term use of the land. The mining overlay zone allows for the use of naturally occurring resources but requires that care be taken to leave the land ready for immediate or eventual reuse consistent with the City' s comprehensive plan. Subd. 2 . Areas Covered. This section applies only within the heavy industry (I-2) zone, and to land in other zones which is within an existing mine or adjacent to and surrounded on at least 3 sides by an existing mine. Subd. 3 . Permitted Uses. Within the mining overlay zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the uses permitted in the underlying zone. Subd. 4 . Conditional Uses. Within the mining overlay zone, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses, except by conditional use permit : A. any use allowed by conditional use permit in the underlying zone; or B. mining. Subd. 5. Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the mining overlay zone, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses: A. any accessory use allowed in the underlying zone; or B. any use accessory to mining, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 6 . Design Standards. A. Density: as specified in the underlying zone. minimum lot area: 20 acres B. Site specifications: Minimum setback from any residential zone: 100 feet . Minimum setback from any residential or business structure which was in existence prior to commencement of mining, unless the written consent of all owners and residents or occupants of said structures is obtained: 500 feet . Minimum setback from any business or industry zone: 30 feet to the boundary of any business or industry zone. Minimum setback from the right-of-way of any existing or platted street : 30 feet, except that excavation may be conducted within the 30 feet in order to reduce the elevation to conform to the street . SEC. 11. 53 . Reserved. SEC. 11 . 54 . SHORELAND OVERLAY ZONE (SH) . Subd. 1. Purpose. The City recognizes the consequences to the public health, safety and general welfare from the indiscriminate use of the shorelands of public waters. The purpose of the shoreland overlay zone is to control the density and location of developments in the shorelands of the public waters of the City in order to preserve water quality, enhance the natural characteristics of the shorelands and provide for the wise use of public waters and related land resources in the City. Subd. 2 . Areas Covered. A. The regulations of the shoreland overlay zone shall apply to all lands within 1000 feet of the ordinary high water level of the following public waters or as mapped, whichever is less restrictive: Name of Lake Classification Dean Lake Natural Environment O'Dowd Lake Recreational Development Unnamed (#70-80) Natural Environment B. The regulations of the shoreland overlay zone shall apply to all lands within 300 feet of the following tributary streams or as mapped, whichever is less restrictive : Eagle Creek Subd. 3 . Permitted Uses. Within the shoreland overlay zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the uses permitted in the underlying zone. Subd. 4 . Conditional Uses. Within the shoreland overlay zone, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit : A. any use allowed by conditional use permit in the underlying zone; or B. boathouses. A boathouse is a structure used solely for the storage of a boat or boating equipment. Subd. 5. Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the shoreland overlay zone, permitted accessory uses are limited to the accessory uses allowed in the underlying zone. Subd. 6. Design Standards. Within the shoreland overlay zone, no land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following minimum requirements : A. Density: as specified in the underlying zone, except as modified below. minimum lot area for riparian structures : residential structures with sewer on natural environment water bodies : 40, 000 square feet residential structures without sewer on natural environment water bodies : 80, 000 square feet residential structures with sewer on recreational development water bodies : 20, 000 square feet residential structures without sewer on recreational development water bodies : 40, 000 square feet minimum lot area for non-riparian structures : residential structures with sewer on natural environment water bodies : 20, 000 square feet residential structures without sewer on natural environment water bodies : 80, 000 square feet residential structures with sewer on recreational development water bodies : 15, 000 square feet residential structures without sewer on recreational development water bodies : 40, 000 square feet B. Impervious surface percentage: as specified in the underlying zone. C. Lot specifications : as specified in the underlying zones, with these additional setback requirements : Minimum lot width at shoreland building line and ordinary high water level : residential structures with sewer on natural environment water bodies: 125 feet residential structures with sewer on recreational development water bodies : 75 feet residential structures with sewer on tributary streams: 75 feet residential structures without sewer on natural environment water bodies : 200 feet residential structures without sewer on recreational development water bodies : 150 feet residential structures without sewer on tributary streams : 100 feet The shore and building line is a line parallel to a lot line or the ordinary high water level at the required setback, whichever is more restrictive, and beyond which neither a structure nor a sanitary facility may extend. Minimum setback from top of bluff : 30 feet Minimum setback from ordinary high water level on natural environment water bodies : 150 feet Minimum setback from recreational development water bodies : any structure with sewer: 75 feet any structure without sewer: 100 feet Minimum setback from ordinary high water level on tributary streams : any structure with sewer: 50 feet any structure without sewer: 100 feet Minimum setback for an individual sewage treatment system from ordinary high water level : any structure on natural environment water bodies: 150 feet any structure on recreational development water bodies : 75 feet any structure on tributary streams: 75 feet Minimum setback for roads and parking facilities : where feasible, all roads and parking facilities shall meet the setback requirements established for structures in this Chapter. In no event shall a road or parking area be placed less than 50 feet from the ordinary high water level or within the shore impact zone, whichever is more restrictive. Subd. 7. Additional Requirements. A. Roads and Parking Facilities. Roads and parking facilities shall be located to retard the runoff of surface waters and nutrients . Natural vegetation or other natural materials shall be used to screen roads and parking facilities when viewed from public waters. B. Elevation of Lowest Floor. Structures shall be placed at an elevation so that the lowest level, including the basement, is a minimum of three feet above the ordinary high water level or the highest water level, whichever is greater. C. Shoreland Alterations. Alteration of vegetation or topography is prohibited unless conducted in such a manner as to prevent soil erosion, preserve shoreland aesthetics, preserve historic sites, prevent bank slumping, and protect fish and wildlife habitat . Vegetation alteration necessary for the construction of structures and individual sewage treatment systems or for the construction of roads and parking facilities shall be exempt from the vegetation alteration standards of this subdivision. Removal or alteration of vegetation, except for agricultural and forest management uses, shall be subject to the following standards : 1. Intensive vegetation clearing within the shore impact zone is prohibited. 2 . In the shore impact zone, limited clearing of trees and shrubs, and cutting, pruning, and trimming of trees may occur to provide a view to the water from the principal dwelling and to accommodate the placement of permitted accessory structures, provided that : a. the screening of structures and vehicles, as viewed from the water, assuming summer, leaf- on conditions, is not substantially reduced; and b. along tributary streams, existing shading of water surfaces is preserved. Notwithstanding the above, the removal of diseased trees, trees seriously damaged by storms or other acts of God, and limbs or branches that are dead, diseased, or pose safety hazards, shall be permitted. D. Stormwater Management. 1. When possible, existing natural drainageways, wetlands, and vegetated soil surfaces shall be used to convey, store, filter, and retain stormwater runoff before discharge to public waters wetlands and public waters that are designated on the protected waters inventory maps prepared under Minnesota Statutes Section 103G.201 . Development shall be planned and constructed in a manner which will minimize the extent of disturbed areas, runoff velocities, and erosion potential ; and reduce and delay runoff volumes . Disturbed areas shall be stabilized and protected as soon as possible and facilities or methods shall be used to retain sediment on the site . 2 . When development density, topographic features, and soil and vegetation conditions are not sufficient to handle stormwater runoff adequately using natural features and vegetation, various types of constructed facilities such as diversions, settling basins, skimming devices, dikes, waterways, and ponds may be used. E. Agricultural and Excavation Standards. 1. Agricultural uses shall be permitted if steep slopes and shore impact zones are maintained in permanent vegetation. The shore impact zone for parcels with permitted agricultural uses shall be the area within a line parallel to and 50 feet from the ordinary high water level . 2 . Mining uses shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of Sec. 11 . 52 of this Chapter. Processing machinery is subject to the setback requirements for structures. SEC. 11.55. Reserved. SEC. 11 . 56 . FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY ZONE (FP) . Subd. 1 . Purpose. The flood hazard areas of Shakopee are subject to periodic inundation which results in potential loss of life, loss of property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures or flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base, all of which adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. This section is based upon a reasonable method of analyzing flood hazards which is consistent with the standards established by the Minnesota department of natural resources . It is the purpose of this section to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, and to minimize those losses described above . Subd. 2 . Areas Covered. A. Generally. This section applies to all lands within the City shown as being within the floodway or flood fringe areas, which together shall be known as the floodplain overlay zone. Such areas may be shown on the official zoning map or on the flood insurance study for Shakopee prepared by the Federal Insurance Administration dated September 29, 1978 and the flood boundary and floodway map and insurance rate map dated September 29, 1978, all of which are hereby adopted by reference. B. Floodplain Subzones. The floodplain overlay zone is hereby divided into the floodway area and flood fringe area. Together these comprise the floodplain overlay zone. 1. Floodway Area. The floodway area includes those areas designated as floodway on the flood boundary and floodway map. 2 . Flood Fringe Area. The flood fringe area includes those areas designated as floodway fringe on the flood boundary and floodway map. Subd. 3 . Permitted Uses in the Floodwav Area. Within the floodway area, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses, which also must be a permitted use in the underlying zone: A. agricultural uses; B. parking and loading spaces; C. airport landing strips; D. commercial recreation, minor or major; E. public recreation; and F. recreational equipment . Subd. 4 . Permitted Uses in the Flood Fringe Area. Within the flood fringe area, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the permitted, conditional, or accessory uses allowed in the underlying zone, except as specified in Subd. 6 below. Subd. 5 . Conditional Uses in the Floodway Area. Within the floodway area, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit, which also must be a permitted or conditional use in the underlying zone : A. structures accessory to the permitted uses listed above or other conditional uses; B. placement of fill; C. mining and storage of sand, gravel, and other mined materials; D. marinas, boat rentals, docks, piers, wharves, and water control structures; E. railroads, streets, bridges, utility transmission lines, and pipelines; F. storage yards for equipment, machinery, or materials; G. campgrounds with facilities for recreational vehicles; H. structural works for flood control such as levees, dikes, and floodwalls constructed to any height where the intent is to protect individual structures, and levees or dikes where the intent is to protect agricultural crops for a frequency flood event equal to or less than the 10-year frequency flood event; and I. other uses similar in nature to uses described above and which are consistent with the other provisions of this Chapter, as determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Subd. 6. Conditional Uses in the Flood Fringe Area. Within the flood fringe area, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit : A. storage of materials or equipment below the regulatory flood protection elevation, if, in time of flooding, the materials or equipment are buoyant, flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life. Subd. 7 . Additional Requirements. A. Floodway Permitted Uses. Floodway permitted uses shall meet the following standards : 1. The use shall have a low flood damage potential ; and 2 . The use shall not obstruct flood flows or increase flood elevations and shall not involve structures, fill, obstructions, excavations, or storage of materials or equipment . B. All Flood Fringe Uses. Flood fringe permitted uses shall meet the following standards : 1. Elevation on Fill. All structures shall be elevated on fill so that the lowest floor including basement floor is at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation. the finished fill elevation for structures shall be no lower than one (1) foot below the regulatory flood protection elevation and the fill shall extend at such elevation at least fifteen (15) feet beyond the outside limits of the structure erected thereon. 2 . Flood Proofing. As an alternative to elevation on fill, structures, other than enclosed buildings intended for human occupancy or habitation, may be internally flood proofed in accordance with the FP- 1, FP-2, FP-3 , or FP-4 flood proofing classification in the State Building Code. For a detached garage, the detached garage must be used solely for parking of vehicles and limited storage. All flood proofed structures must meet the following additional standards, as appropriate: a. The structure must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure and shall be designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls; and b. Any mechanical and utility equipment in the structure must be elevated to or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or properly flood proofed. 3 . Alternatives to Elevation on Fill or Flood Proofing. The lowest floor above the regulatory flood protection elevation shall be elevated through the use of stilts, pilings, parallel walls, etc. , or through the use of above-grade, enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck under garages . The base or floor of an enclosed area shall be considered above-grade and not a structure' s basement or lowest floor if : (1) the enclosed area is above-grade on at least one side of the structure; (2) it is designed to internally flood and is constructed with flood resistant materials; and (3) it is used solely for parking, building access, or storage . In addition, the following additional standards shall be met : a. Design and Certification. The structure' s design and as-built condition shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect as being in compliance with the general design standards of the State Building Code and, specifically, that all electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, air conditioning equipment, and other service facilities shall be at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or be designed to prevent flood water from entering or accumulating within these components during times of flooding. b. Specific Standards for Above-grade, Enclosed Areas. Above-grade, fully enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck under garages shall be designed to internally flood and the design plans shall stipulate : (1) The minimum area of openings in the walls where internal flooding is to be used as a flood proofing technique. When openings are placed in a structure' s walls to provide for entry of flood waters to equalize pressures, the bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of flood waters; and (2) the enclosed area shall be designed of flood resistant materials in accordance with the FP-3 or FP-4 classifications in the State Building Code. No dwelling shall have a basement below the regulatory flood protection elevation. A structure other than a dwelling may have a basement below the regulatory flood protection elevation, if all areas of the structure below the regulatory flood protection elevation are flood proofed to the FP-1 or FP-2 flood proofing classification in the State Building Code. Structures flood proofed to the FP- 3 or FP-4 classification shall not be permitted. 4. Storage. The storage of any materials or equipment shall be elevated on fill to the regulatory flood protection elevation, flood proofed, or protected by structural measures consistent with the purpose of this Section. 5 . Access. All new principal structures shall have vehicular access at or above an elevation not more than two feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation. A variance may be granted to this requirement if the Board of Adjustment and Appeals finds that adequate flood warning time and flood emergency response procedures exist, and if specific limitations are placed on the period of use or occupancy of the structure . 6 . Business and Industry Uses. Accessory uses to a business use, such as yards, railroad tracks, and parking facilities, may be at elevations lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation. However, facilities to be used by the employees or the general public shall not be allowed in the absence of a flood warning system that provides adequate time for evacuation if the area would be inundated to a depth greater than two feet or be subject to flood velocities greater than four feet per second upon the occurrence of the regional flood. 7 . Industry Uses. Measures shall be taken to minimize interference with normal plant operations especially along streams having protracted floor durations. Due consideration shall be given to needs of an industry whose business requires that it be located in flood plain areas. 8. Fill. Fill shall be properly compacted and the slopes shall be properly protected by the use of rip rap, vegetative cover, or other acceptable method. If a change of special flood hazard area designation will be requested, the Federal Emergency Management Agency criteria for compaction and side slope protection should be investigated. 9. Hydraulic Capacity. Flood plain developments shall not adversely affect the hydraulic capacity of the channel and adjoining flood plain of any tributary watercourse or drainage system where a floodway or other encroachment limit has not been specified on the zoning map. C. Public Utilities and Transportation Facilities. 1. Utilities. All public utilities and facilities such as gas, electrical, sewer, and water supply systems shall be flood proofed in accordance with the State Building Code or elevated to above the regulatory flood protection elevation. 2 . Transportation Facilities. Railroad tracks, roads, and bridges shall be elevated to the regulatory flood protection elevation where failure or interruption of these transportation facilities would result in danger to the public health or safety or where such facilities are essential to the orderly functioning of the area. Local roads, whether public or private, or railroad spur lines may be constructed at a lower elevation where failure or interruption of service would not endanger the public health or safety. 3 . On-site Sewage Treatment and Water Supply System. Where public utilities are not provided, on-site water supply systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems . New or replacement on-site sewage treatment systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters, and they shall not be subject to impairment or contamination during times of flooding. Any sewage treatment system designed in accordance with the state' s current statewide standards for on-site sewage treatment systems shall be determined to be in compliance with this Chapter. D. Relocated Residential Structures. The placement of relocated residential structures, including new or replacement manufactured homes, will be treated as a new structure and may be placed only if elevated in compliance with this Chapter. All relocated residential structures shall be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system that resists flotation, collapse, and lateral movement. Anchoring may include, but is not limited to, use of over-the-top or frame ties to ground anchors. B. Permit. In addition to the usual Building Permit required for new construction, the Zoning Administrator shall grant a permit prior to the placement of fill, excavation of materials, or the storage of materials or equipment in the flood plain. The applicant shall submit certification by a registered professional engineer, registered architect, or registered land surveyor that the finished fill and building elevations were accomplished in compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. Flood proofing measures shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or registered architect . F. Record of First Floor Elevation. The Zoning Administrator shall maintain a record of the elevation of the lowest floor (including basement) of all new structures and alterations or additions to existing structures in the flood plain. The Zoning Administrator also shall maintain a record of the elevation to which structures and alterations or additions to structures are flood proofed. Subd. 8 . Warning and Disclaimer of Liability. This Chapter does not imply that areas outside the floodplain overlay zone or land uses permitted within such zones will be free from flooding or flood damage. This Chapter shall not create liability on the part of the City or any officer or employee thereof for any flood damages that result from reliance on this Chapter or any administrative decision lawfully made hereunder. SEC. 11.57 . Reserved. SEC. 11. 58 . OLD SHAKOPEE BUSINESS OVERLAY ZONE (B-1C) . Subd. 1 . Purpose. The purpose of the Old Shakopee business overlay zone is to provide an area for the continuation of existing commercial development and development of existing lots in the older business areas for uses fronting on or with immediate access to arterial and collector streets . The combination of small lots is encouraged. Subd. 2 . Areas Covered. The Old Shakopee business overlay zone may be applied to property zoned highway business (B-1) and developed, surrounded by development, or platted for development as of the effective date of this ordinance. Subd. 3 . Permitted Uses. Within the Old Shakopee business overlay zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the uses permitted in the underlying highway business (B-1) zone. Subd. 4 . Conditional Uses . Within the Old Shakopee business overlay zone, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the uses permitted in the underlying highway business (B-1) zone. Subd. 5. Permitted Accessory Uses. Within the Old Shakopee business overlay zone, permitted accessory uses are limited to the accessory uses allowed in the underlying highway business (B-i) zone. Subd. 6 . Design Standards. Within the Old Shakopee business overlay zone, no land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following minimum requirements: A. Density: minimum lot area: 8, 000 square feet maximum floor area ratio: .50 B. Maximum impervious surface percentage: 75% C. Lot specifications: minimum lot width: 60 feet minimum front yard setback: 30 feet minimum side yard setback: 10 feet minimum rear yard setback: 30 feet D. Maximum height : 25 feet, without a conditional use permit SEC. 11.59 . Reserved. SEC. 11. 60 . PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. Subd. 1. Purpose. The guiding of land development into a compatible relationship of uses depends upon the maintenance of certain standards . The purpose of this section is to establish limitations on certain activities with a high potential for pollution or nuisance . The performance standards shall apply in all zones, unless specifically stated to the contrary. Subd. 2 . Exterior Storage. In all zones, exterior storage is prohibited except as regulated by conditional use permit, planned unit development, or as specifically provided in the zone regulations . Notwithstanding the above, exterior storage of the following items is a permitted accessory use in residential zones : A. laundry drying; B. recreational equipment; C. construction and landscaping materials and equipment currently being used on the premises; D. agricultural equipment and materials if these are used or intended for use on the premises; and E. off-street parking of personal vehicles . Subd. 3 . Refuse. All refuse shall be stored and disposed of in accordance with City Code Sec. 3 .15 . Subd. 4. Construction Materials. A. Structures in all zones shall be constructed of materials which comply with the building codes . B. In the business zones and in the medium density residential (R-2) and multiple-family residential (R-3) zones, only the following listed materials and similar materials shall be used: face brick; stone; glass; wood; decorative block; painted block; architecturally treated concrete; cast in place or precast concrete panels; or siding, soffets or facia made of aluminum, steel, or vinyl . Similarity shall be determined by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals based upon color, texture, wearability, safety, and compatibility with structures on the same and adjacent lots or parcels of land. C. In the industry zones, face brick, stone, glass, wood, architecturally treated concrete, decorative block, painted block, cast in place or precast concrete panels, or similar materials shall be used for any portion of a structure facing a street . Subd. 5 . Bulk Storage of Liquids . All bulk storage of oil, gasoline, liquid fertilizer, chemicals, and similar liquids shall comply with the requirements of the appropriate state or federal agency. Within the agricultural preservation (AG) and rural residential (RR) zones, all bulk storage shall be in above ground containers . Subd. 6 . Grading, Filling and Excavation. A. No person shall undertake, authorize, or permit any of the following actions without first having obtained a grading permit from the City: 1. in any designated floodplain or shoreland overlay zone, any excavating, grading, filling or other change in the earth' s topography; or 2 . in any zone other than a floodplain or shoreland overlay zone, any excavating, grading, filling, or other change in the earth' s topography involving moving more than 50 cubic yards of material . B. Notwithstanding the above, no grading permit shall be required for the following activities, except as required by the Minnesota State Building Code : 1. earthwork undertaken in accordance with an approved development; 2 . earthwork which will result in moving less than 50 cubic yards of material, provided the work does not take place in any designated floodplain or shoreland overlay zone; or 3 . any agricultural activity. C. No person shall undertake, authorize or permit any excavating, grading, filling, or other change in the earth' s topography which violates or is not in compliance with a grading permit issued by the City, including the approved plans and all terms and conditions of the permit. Subd. 7 . Screening. Whenever required, screening shall be accomplished through the use of landscaping, topography, site planning, or construction materials. Screening shall provide an opaque obstruction to view. All construction materials used shall be of good quality and compatible with the materials of the principal structure. Chain link fencing interwoven with slats shall not be allowed as a screening material . Landscaping materials utilized for screening shall be healthy specimens of hardy species appropriate for the purpose. All screening shall be maintained in good condition or repair and shall be replaced when it no longer serves its intended function. Screening shall be accomplished in accordance with the following: A. All exterior storage permitted by this Chapter shall be screened, except for the following: goods being displayed for sale, materials and equipment being used for construction on the premises, merchandise located on gas station pump islands, and accessory uses in residential zones (except parking facilities as specified below) . B. Off-street parking facilities in the medium density residential (R-2) and multiple-family residential (R-3) zones shall be screened whenever the parking facility contains more than four parking spaces and is within thirty feet of a lot line, and whenever the driveway to a parking facility of more than six parking spaces is within fifteen feet of a lot line. C. Parking facilities within any required front yard setback shall be screened to a height of three feet . D. Screening shall be required in all business and industry zones whenever any business or industrial use is adjacent to or across a street from property zoned or developed for residential use. E. All roof top mechanical equipment shall be totally screened from view from adjacent properties and existing and planned streets, painted to match or complement the building, or incorporated into an architectural design which is aesthetically compatible with the building. F. Refuse containers in business and industry zones which are visible from existing or planned streets, residential areas, institutional uses, or places of public assembly shall be screened to a height of six feet . G. Loading and service areas located between a street and a building in any industry zone shall be screened to a height of four feet . Subd. 8. Landscaping Requirements. Landscaping shall be required in all multiple-family residential, business and industry zones in accordance with the following: A. For all residential uses containing 6 or more dwellings, and for all business and industrial uses, at least 15 percent of the lot shall be landscaped. The landscaping shall be concentrated between the principal structure and any adjacent street right-of-way or other areas of the lot which are visible from a street . B. A minimum of five units, as defined below, of landscaping shall be required for each 1, 000 square feet or fraction thereof of gross building area up to 10, 000 square feet . An additional three units of landscaping shall be required for each 1, 000 square feet or fraction thereof of gross building area over 10, 000 and up to 50, 000 square feet . An additional unit of landscaping shall be required for each 1, 000 square feet or fraction thereof of gross building area over 50, 000 and up to 100, 000 square feet . An additional 1 unit of landscaping shall be required for each 5, 000 square feet or fraction thereof of gross building area over 100, 000 . C. Landscaping materials must meet the following minimum size requirements : 1. overstory deciduous trees 2 inch diameter 2 . ornamental trees 1 - 1 / 2 inch diameter 3 . coniferous trees 6 feet 4 . shrubbery 5 gallons Each of the above shall constitute one unit of landscaping. Not more than 50 percent of the landscaping units required by this section shall be composed of shrubbery. D. If healthy landscaping of acceptable species exists on a site prior to development, the Zoning Administrator may allow credit for such landscaping in meeting the requirements of this subdivision, if it is left in good condition. One unit of mature existing landscaping may be credited as two units of new landscaping. Each existing mature hardwood tree may be credited as three units. E. All landscaping shall be properly maintained and any dead or diseased material shall be removed and replaced with material meeting the requirements of this section. The City shall require submission of a landscaping bond in an amount equal to 115 percent of the value of the landscaping to ensure compliance with this section during the first year after planting. Subd. 9. Tree and Woodland Preservation. The following standards shall apply to all residential development for which a building permit is issued after the effective date of this Chapter. A. Structures, driveways, and parking facilities shall be located in such a manner that the maximum number of trees shall be preserved. No tree exceeding 6" in diameter at a height of 6 feet above ground shall be removed without permission from the City. A person seeking permission to remove any protected tree shall demonstrate that there are no feasible or prudent alternatives to the cutting cf trees on the site and shall propose a reforestation plan. Reforestation and landscaping shall utilize a variety of tree species and shall not utilize any species presently under disease epidemic . Species planted shall be hardy under local conditions and compatible with the local landscape. B. All development activities, including grading and contouring, shall take place in such a manner that the root zone aeration stability of existing trees shall not be affected and shall provide existing trees with a watering area equal to a minimum of one-half the crown area. C. Notwithstanding the above, the removal of diseased trees, or trees seriously damaged by storms or other acts of God, shall be permitted. Subd. 10 . Exterior Lightincr. A. Exterior lighting shall be designed and constructed to limit direct illumination and glare upon or into any other lot or street. Reflected glare or spill light shall not exceed five-tenths footcandle as measured on the property line when abutting any residential lot and one footcandle on any property line abutting a business or industrial lot. Street lights installed in public right-of-way and lights in city parks shall be excepted from these standards. B. Mitigative measures shall be employed to limit glare and spill light to protect neighboring lots and to maintain traffic safety on streets. These measures shall include lenses, shields, louvers, prismatic control devices, and limitations on the height and type of fixtures. The City also may limit the hours of operation of outdoor lighting if it is deemed necessary to reduce impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. C. No flickering or flashing lights shall be permitted except where required by the Federal Aviation Administration. D. Direct off-site views of the light source shall be blocked or screened except for globe or ornamental light fixtures, which may be approved when it can be demonstrated that the off-site impacts stemming from direct views of the light source are mitigated by the fixture design or location. E. The City may require submission of a light distribution plan if teemed necessary to ensure compliance with the intent cf this Chapter. F. In any industry zone, light may spill from one lot to any other lc: provided that it does not extend beyond the boundaries of the industry zone. Subd. 11 . Noise and Vibration. A. Noises emanating from any use shall be in compliance with City Code Sec. 10 . 60, and shall not exceed any standards set by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. B. Any use established or remodeled after the effective date of this Chapter shall be so operated as to prevent vibration discernable at any point beyond the lot line of the site on which such use is located. C. Ground vibration and noise caused by trains, aircraft operations, temporary construction or demolition, or vehicles other than those involved in a major commercial recreation use or on private property shall be exempt from these regulations. Subd. 12 . Smoke and Particulate Matter. No use shall produce or emit smoke, dust, or particulate matter exceeding applicable regulations established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Subd. 13 . Odor. No use shall produce odors exceeding applicable regulations established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Subd. 14 . Toxic or Noxious Matter. No use or operation shall emit toxic or noxious matter across the property line which exceeds applicable regulations of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Subd. 15 . Hazardous Materials or Waste, Infectious Waste, and Pollutants. Each use involving hazardous materials or waste, infectious waste, or pollutants, shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Office of Safety and Health Administration, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Health, and any other applicable federal, state, and local regulatory provisions . Any project for which an EAW is mandatory under Minn. Rule 4410 .4300 shall request an EAW from the responsible governmental unit specified in that Rule. The project shall not be developed until all environmental issues have been resolved to the satisfaction of the responsible governmental unit, including incorporating any mitigation measures into the project . Subd. 16. Radiation. No operation shall be conducted which exceeds the standards established by applicable state or federal regulations. Subd. 17 . Electromagnetic Interference. No use shall produce electromagnetic interference which exceeds applicable standards established by any applicable federal or state regulations . Subd. 18 . Receive-Only Satellite Dish Antennas and Other Antenna Devices . Receive-only satellite dish antennas and other antenna devices are subject to the following requirements : A. shall be in compliance with all City building and electrical code requirements; B. shall have verification that the structural design and mounting system have been approved by a professional engineer; C. shall be limited to one per building or, if more than one antenna is proposed, the antennas shall be clustered in a single, screened location; D. shall not have any advertising message on the antenna structure; E. shall comply with setback requirements for principal structures and in no event shall be located between the principal structure and the front lot line; F. shall be screened to the greatest extent practicable to minimize visual impacts on surrounding properties. Screening shall include landscape materials for ground mounted antennas, and materials compatible with those utilized on the exterior of the building for roof mounted antennas; G. shall be designed and engineered to collapse progressively within the distance between the antenna and the property line, if the antenna is located closer to a property line than the height of the antenna; and H. shall be in compliance with all applicable Federal Communications Commission requirements. Subd. 19. Preservation of Surface Waters. A. All development shall be planned and constructed to minimize the impact on natural drainage. Above-ground drainage systems may be constructed to augment the natural drainage system. The widths of a constructed drainage system shall be sufficient to adequately channel runoff from a ten-year storm. Adequacy shall be determined by the expected runoff when full development of the drainage area is reached. No fences or structures may be constructed across the drainage system which will reduce or restrict the flow of water. The bed of the drainage system shall be at such a grade that will not result in a velocity that will cause erosion of the banks of the drainage system, and in no event shall exceed five feet of horizontal distance for each foot of vertical distance . B. The bed of the drainage system shall be protected with turf, sod, or concrete . If turf or sod will not function properly, rip rap may be used. Rip rap shall consist of quarried limestone cr fieldstone . The rip rap shall be no smaller than two ;2) inches square nor larger than two (2) feet square. C. The banks or walls of the drainage system shall be protected with turf . If the flow velocity in the drainage system is such that erosion of the turf sidewall will occur and the velocity cannot be decreased by means of velocity ccntrol structures, gravel or rip rap may be used to replace the turf . D. To prevent sedimentation cf drainage systems, pervious and impervious sediment trans and other sediment control structures shall be incorporated throughout the contributing watershed. During construction, the City may require temporary pervious sediment traps, such as a construction of bales of hay with a low spillway embankment section of sand and gravel that permits a slow movement of water while filtering sediment . The City also shall utilize permanent impervious sediment control structures, such as debris basins, desilting basins, or silt traps to remove sediment from runoff prior to its disposal in any permanent body of water. B. All erosion and velocity control structures shall be maintained in a condition that will insure continuous functioning. Sediment basins shall be maintained as the need occurs to insure continuous desilting action. The areas utilized for runoff drainage systems and sediment basins shall not be allowed to exist in an unsightly condition. The banks of the sediment basins and drainage systems shall be landscaped. Subd. 20. Ground Water Protection. A. No use may dispose of any waste directly into the ground water in violation of the requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. B. No use shall operate in a manner which will cause alterations of the existing water table, unless such alteration meets all requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Subd. 21. Sight Triangles. The area between three and ten feet in height shall be maintained clear of all obstructions at the intersections of streets with other streets and driveways for safety of pedestrians and people in vehicles . Structures and landscaping are prohibited within any sight triangle, except that structures or landscaping are permitted if they do not exceed one foot in width or diameter. Property in the central business (B-3) zone is exempt from the sight triangle requirements . A. Street Intersections. The chart below specifies the required clear area for each street intersection. The City Engineer may require additional triangle area if a traffic study or special conditions indicate that additional protection is needed. Intersection major minor of \ with arterial arterial collector local major arterial A A B B minor arterial A B B B collector B B B B local B B B B Key: A = 100 foot by 100 foot sight triangle B = 30 foot by 30 foot sight triangle B. Driveway Intersections. The street/driveway sight triangle shall be calculated by measuring a straight line down the edges of the pavement or curb or projection thereof, and drawing a third straight line connecting the extremities of the other two lines. On the right side of the driveway, as determined when standing in the driveway facing the street, the sight triangle shall extend forty feet down the street and twelve feet from the edge of the street up the driveway pavement, with a third line connecting the other two lines. . On the left side of the driveway, the sight triangle shall extend sixty-five feet down the street and twelve feet up the driveway pavement, with a third line connecting the other two lines. SEC. 11.61. PARKING. Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose for the regulation of off-street parking is to alleviate or prevent congestion of the public right- of-way and to promote the safety and general welfare of the public by establishing minimum requirements for off-street parking of vehicles based on the use of the land. Subd. 2 . General Provisions. A. Application. The provisions of this section apply to the required and non-required off-street parking in all zones, except that property within the central business (B-3) zone is exempt from the off-street parking requirements. These provisions apply to the entire area used for vehicular circulation and parking. B. Where May Park. 1. Except in the agricultural preservation (AG) zone, a vehicle may be parked only on a street or alley, or in a properly surfaced parking facility. Vehicles may be parked on grass or outside a parking facility when a flood or other emergency prohibits the use of the parking facility, or when the required parking for a particular use is insufficient to meet a business rush, such as during the holiday season. 2 . A recreational vehicle may be parked for more than 24 hours only on an approved sales lot or self- storage facility, as specified in the parking provisions relating to residential parking facilities, or in a campground. C. Expansion of Existing Uses. Any existing use or structure which is altered or enlarged must comply with the provisions of this section. D. Reduction of Parking Spaces. Off-street parking spaces existing upon the effective date of this Chapter shall not be reduced in number below the requirements set forth in this section for that use. E. Use of Parking Space. No required off-street parking space shall be used for an open sales lot or for open storage. F. Maintenance. The owner of the principal use, uses, or structure shall maintain the parking facility and curbing in a neat and adequate manner. G. Residential Parking Facilities. 1. Required. Off-street parking facilities located outside of required setbacks shall be provided for at least two vehicles for all single family dwellings . A suitable location for both a garage measuring at least 20 feet by 24 feet and a 10 foot driveway, which do not require a variance, shall be provided and indicated as such on a survey or site plan to be submitted when applying for a building permit to construct a new dwelling or alter an existing garage. 2 . Use. Off-street parking facilities in an rural residential (RR) , low density residential (R-1A) , urban residential (R-1B) , Old Shakopee residential (R-1C) , medium density (R-2) , or multiple-family residential (R-3) zone shall be used solely for the parking of personal vehicles . 3 . Location. Off-street parking facilities in a residential zone shall not be located in the front yard setback or in a street side yard setback. 4 . Recreational Vehicles. In a residential zone, one of the exterior parking spaces for a dwelling may be used for parking or storing an unoccupied recreational vehicle, less than thirty-five (35) feet in length. No living quarters shall be maintained nor any business practiced in the recreational vehicle while it is so parked or stored. The recreational vehicle shall comply with all parking and building setbacks for the zone and shall utilize only the existing driveway into the site. A recreational vehicle brought by a visitor may be parked or occupied for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days while visiting the resident of the property. H. Combined Parking Facilities. Required off-street parking facilities for more than one use, lot, or parcel of land may be provided through joint parking facility, a shared parking plan, or a cooperative parking plan. When required off-street parking facilities are provided off- site, written authority for using such property for off- street parking during the existence of the use shall be filed with the City. No such parking facility at its closest point shall be located more then 300 feet from the use being served. 1. Joint Parking. Off-street parking facilities for two or more uses may be provided in a joint facility. The joint parking facility shall include sufficient spaces to meet the separate requirements for each use . 2 . Shared Parking. Off-street parking facilities for two or more uses with substantially different hours of operation may be provided in a shared facility. Evidence must be submitted showing that the uses normally are not open, used, or operated during substantially the same hours . Up to fifty percent (50%) of the required off-street parking facilities for a use may be provided in a shared parking facility. Shared parking is not a right, and the City shall have the discretion to give credit up to the fifty percent (50%) limitation based upon its review of plans, uses, and other information related to the off-street parking needs . 3 . Cooperative Parking. Off-street parking facilities for one use may be provided on the property of another use in a cooperative facility when that use has more parking spaces than are required. The excess spaces may be shared with another use through a cooperative parking plan. 4 . Application. An application for approval of a shared parking plan or a cooperative parking plan shall be filed with the Zoning Administrator. The application shall be signed by the owner or owners of the entire land area to be included within the cooperative parking plan, the owner or owners of all structures then existing on such land areas, and all parties having a legal interest in such land area and structures . The application shall include plans showing the location of the use or structures for which off-street parking facilities are required, the location of the off-street parking facilities, and the schedule of times used by those sharing in common. 5. Review. The application shall be reviewed by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Upon approval of a shared parking plan or a cooperative parking plan, the plan shall be recorded in the office of the Scott County Recorder. 6. Residential Parking Facilities. Required off- street parking in residential zones shall be on the same lot or parcel of land as the structure for which parking is required. Subd. 3 . Design Standards. A. Access. Parking facilities shall provide a direct access to a public alley or street . B. Traffic Flow. Parking facilities shall be designed so that vehicles may enter, circulate, park, and exit in a convenient and orderly fashion. Backing onto streets is prohibited in multiple-family, business, and industry zones . C. Angled Parking. Parking spaces oriented at less than 90 degrees to the aisle shall be limited to one-way circulation. D. Surfacing. Except for parking facilities for single family dwellings within the agricultural preservation (AG) , rural residential (RR) , low density residential (R- 1A) , urban residential (R-1B) , and Old Shakopee residential (R-1C) zones, the entire parking facility shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete. Parking facilities for only one or two vehicles may be surfaced with other material which is dust-free and impervious to penetration by water. E. Setback. In all multiple-family residential, business, and industry zones, a minimum fifteen foot setback shall be required between any parking facility and a street . A minimum five (5) foot setback shall be required between any parking facility and any other property line. These parking setbacks shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements listed in Sec. 11 . 60 . F. Handicap Facilities. Required handicap spaces and ramps shall be provided as specified in the State Building Code. G. Minimum Size of Parking Spaces. Each parking space shall be not less than 9 feet wide. Other minimum dimensional requirements for the design of parking facilities are shown in Table 1 . Parking spaces beyond the minimum required number may be smaller or of different dimensions. TABLE 1 Parking Lot Design Angle of Parking Dimension Diagram 45° 60° 75° 90° Space width, A 12 . 7 10 .4 9 . 3 9 . 0 parallel to aisle Space length of line B 25 . 0 22 . 0 20 . 0 20 . 0 Space depth C 17 . 5 19 . 0 19 . 5 20 . 0 Aisle width D 12 . 0 16 . 0 23 . 0 24 . 0 between space lines Space depth, interlock E 15 .3 17 . 5 18 . 8 24 . 0 Module, edge of pavement F 44 . 8 52 . 5 61.3 64 . 0 to interlock Module interlocking G 42 .6 51. 0 61. 0 64 . 0 Module, interlocking H 42 .8 50 .2 58 . 8 60 .5 to curb face Bumper overhang I 2 . 0 2 .3 2 .5 0 . 0 Offset J 6 .3 2 . 7 0 .5 0 . 0 Cross aisle, one way K 14 . 0 14 . 0 14 . 0 14 . 0 Cross aisle, two way K 24 . 0 24 . 0 24 . 0 24 . 0 Subd. 4. Required Number of Parking Spaces. A. Floor Area. The term "floor area" for the purpose of calculating the number of required off-street parking spaces shall be the total floor area of all levels of a building, minus hallways, utility spaces, storage areas for uses not involving warehousing, and other accessory spaces. B. Calculating Space. When determining the number of required off-street parking spaces results in a fraction, each fraction of one-half (1/2) or more shall constitute another space . C. Benches. In public assembly places where seating is provided on benches, pews, or other similar items, each 22 inches of such seating shall be counted as one seat for the purpose of determining required parking. D. Uses Not Listed. When the parking requirements for a use are not specified, the Zoning Administrator shall determine which listed use or uses are the most similar to the proposed use. The parking requirements for that listed use or uses shall apply to the proposed use. E. Required Off-Street Parking. Each use must provide, at a minimum, the number of required off-street parking spaces listed on Table 2 . For lots or parcels of land containing more than one use, the minimum number of required off-street parking spaces for each use must be provided. TABLE 2 NUMBER OF REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES PER UNIT OF MEASUREMENT Use or Use Category Number Unit 1. Residential and Lodging a. Single family, two- 2 . 0 dwelling family, or multiple- family dwellings b. Senior citizen housing and 1. 0 dwelling congregate housing c. Bed and breakfast inns 1 . 0 guest room 1 . 0 operator d. Motels, hotels - excluding 1. 0 guest room restaurants and night clubs +1. 0 two employees 2 . Education, Cultural, and Institutional a. Jr. high, elementary and 1. 0 classroom nursery schools +1. 0 50 student design capacity b. Senior high schools 1 . 0 7 student design capacity +1. 0 classroom c. Churches, auditoriums, funeral homes 1 . 0 4 seats in main assembly area d. Nursing homes 4 . 0 minimum +1 . 0 500 square feet of floor area over 1000 s.f. e . Hospitals 1 . 0 2 hospital beds f. Public buildings, community centers, 10 . 0 minimum public libraries, +1 . 0 300 square feet art galleries, museums, of floor area post office over 1000 s.f. g. public recreation 1 . 0 3 persons attending design capacity h. Golf courses, sports 20 . 0 minimum facility, fitness club +1 . 0 300 square feet of floor area over 1000 s.f. i . Athletic field 1 . 0 8 seats j . Commercial recreation 15 . 0 minimum +50 . 0 acre of developed recreation area 3. Business/Industry a. airports and heliports 1 . 0 4 seats in waiting area +1 . 0 employee on largest shift b. animal hospitals, 1 . 0 500 square feet veterinary clinics c. bowling alley 5 . 0 bawling lane d. bus terminals 1 . 0 500 square feet e. car washes 3 . 0 stall f. cemeteries 4 . 0 minimum g. commercial feedlots 1. 0 employee on largest shift h. concrete or asphalt plants 1. 0 employee on largest shift i . day care facility 1 . 0 per 5 children j . dry cleaning plants 1 . 0 300 square feet k. financial institutions 1 . 0 200 square feet of floor area 1 . forestry and nursery uses 1 . 0 500 square feet of sales area m. funeral homes 1 . 0 employee on largest shift n. furniture and 1. 0 400 square feet appliance stores of floor area o. gas stations 1 . 0 6 gas pumps +1 . 0 150 square feet p. grain elevators 1 . 0 employee on largest shift q. industrial or technical 1. 0 3 students training schools +1. 0 employee on largest shift r. junkyards 1. 0 employee on largest shift s. kennels 1 . 0 400 square feet t . landscaping service 1 . 0 employee on and contractors largest shift +1. 0 500 square feet of sales area u. manufacturing and processing 1. 0 500 square feet facilities of floor area, or employee on largest shift, whichever is greater v. medical, dental clinics 1.0 200 square feet of floor area w. motor freight terminals 1 . 0 1000 square feet +1. 0 200 square feet of office area x. offices 1 . 0 250 square feet of floor area y. open sales lots, use 1 . 0 500 square feet with exterior storage of sales area of goods for sale z . printing or publishing 1 . 0 employee on facilities largest shift aa. private lodges and clubs 1 . 0 4 seats bb. railroad operations 1 . 0 employee on largest shift cc . recycling or composting 1 . 0 1,000 square facilities feet, or employee on largest shift, whichever is greater dd. research, experimental 1 . 0 employee on or testing facilities largest shift ee. restaurants (class I) 1. 0 3 seats ff. restaurants (class II) 1. 0 50 square feet of floor area +1. 0 3 seats gg. retail establishments 1 . 0 150 square feet of floor area hh. riding academies 1. 0 4 horse stalls ii. seasonal produce stands 3 . 0 minimum jj . self-storage facilities 1. 0 10 storage units +1. 0 employee on largest shift +1 . 0 resident manager kk. service garages for 4 . 0 minimum major vehicle repair +1 . 0 service stall 11 . shopping centers 1 . 0 200 square feet of floor area mm. taverns 1. 0 50 square feet of floor area nn. taxi stands 1. 0 employee oo. theaters, auditoriums, 1. 0 4 seats or sports arenas pp. truck or trailer rental 1 . 0 400 square feet facilities qq. uses having a drive-up 1 . 0 driving lane or drive-through window rr. vehicle, marine, 6 . 0 minimum implement, garden +1 . 0 500 square feet supply, building of floor area and material sales over 1000 s.f. ss . vending machine establishments 1 . 0 vending machine tt . warehouses 1 . 0 employee on largest shift uu. wholesaling establishments 1 . 0 1, 000 square feet of floor area, or employee on largest shift, whichever is greater SEC. 11. 62 . DRIVEWAYS . Subd. 1 . Purpose. The purpose of the regulation of driveways is to alleviate or prevent congestion cf the public right-of-way and to promote the safety and general welfare of the public by establishing minimum requirements for driveways based on the use of the land. Subd. 2 . General Provisions. A. Application. The provisions of this section apply to the required and non-required driveways in all zones . B. Use of Driveway. No required off-street driveway shall be used for an open sales lot or for open storage . C. Maintenance. The owner of the principal use, uses, or structure shall maintain the driveway and curbs in a neat and adequate manner. D. Shared Driveways. Driveways serving more than one lot or parcel of land may be approved by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals in approving shared driveways shall require the following: 1. A property owner' s association or maintenance agreement for the driveway must be executed designating the party responsible for maintaining the driveway, and granting that party the right to assess all properties benefitting from the driveway for the cost of maintenance. The agreement also shall grant the City the right to enter and maintain the driveway when it deems necessary to maintain safe access, and to charge the cost of such maintenance back to the property owners . 2. When the proposed shared driveway is an existing driveway, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall review the condition of the driveway and make a determination as to whether the driveway must be upgraded to insure proper and safe access . If the Board of Adjustment and Appeals determines that the driveway must be upgraded, the homeowner' s association or property owners will be required to execute a developer' s agreement with the City for the improvement of the driveway. Subd. 3 . Design Standards. A. Access. No vehicle shall be allowed to access a lot or parcel of land except at the approved driveway location. B. Turn Around Area. Construction of on-site turn-around facilities is required for multiple-family, business, and industrial uses in order to eliminate any backing out onto the street . C. Traffic Flow. Driveways shall be designed so that vehicles may enter, circulate, park, and exit parking facilities in a convenient and orderly fashion. The traffic generated by any use shall be channeled and controlled in a manner that will avoid congestion on the streets, traffic hazards, and excessive traffic through residential areas, particularly commercial vehicles. E. Surfacing. Except for driveways for single family dwellings within the agricultural preservation (AG) , rural residential (RR) , low density residential (R-1A) , urban residential (R-1B) , and Old Shakopee residential (R-1C) zones, the entire driveway shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete . Driveways leading to parking spaces for only one or two vehicles, and driveways in excess of 50 feet in length in the agricultural preservation (AG) and rural residential (RR) zones, may be surfaced with other material which is dust-free and impervious to penetration by water. F. Curb Cuts. The number and size of driveways intersecting with City streets shall be in accordance with Chapter 7 of the City Code and as approved by the City Engineer. Driveways onto County roads are regulated by the County Engineer. Driveways onto state and federal highways are regulated by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. G. Driveway Setback. Driveways shall be set back a minimum of five (5) feet from any side or rear lot line. Except in the low density residential (R-1A) zone, and except directly in front of a garage door, no driveway shall be closer than three (3) feet to any single or two family dwelling, nor closer than five (5) feet to any multiple- family or business building. H. Number of Driveways. A maximum of one driveway per 200 feet of frontage shall be allowed for multiple-family, business and industrial uses. I. Driveway Widths. Driveways widths shall be as approved by the City Engineer. J. Driveway Location. Driveways shall be located outside the sight triangle and as far as possible from any street corner. Driveway locations shall be selected to cause the least interference with the movement of traffic on streets. K. Emergency Vehicles. All driveways shall have a minimum width of ten (10) feet with a pavement strength capable of supporting emergency vehicles . L. Maximum Driveway Grade. No driveway grade shall exceed 15% within 25 feet of the property line. SEC. 11 .63 . LOADING FACILITIES. Subd. 1 . Purpose. The purpose of the regulation of off-street loading is to alleviate or prevent congestion of the public right- of-way and to promote the safety and general welfare of the public by establishing minimum requirements for loading and unloading from vehicles based on the use of the land. Subd. 2 . General Provisions. A. Application. The provisions of this section apply to the required and non-required off-street loading facilities in all zones, except that property within the central business (B-3) zone is exempt from the off-street loading requirements . B. Expansion of Existing Uses. Any existing use or structure which is altered or enlarged must comply with the provisions of this section. C. Calculation. All loading space requirements shall be in addition to any parking space or driveway requirements . D. Use of Loading Space. No required loading space shall be used for an open sales lot or exterior storage. E. Maintenance. The owner of the principal use, uses, or structure shall maintain the loading space and curbing in a neat and adequate manner. Subd. 3 . Design Standards. A. Access. Loading spaces shall have a direct access to a public alley or street. B. Traffic Flow. Loading spaces shall be designed so that vehicles may enter and exit in a convenient and orderly fashion. Backing onto streets is prohibited in multiple- family, business, and industry zones. The loading spaces shall be located to cause the least interference with the movement of traffic on streets. C. Surfacing. All loading spaces shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete. D. Setback. All loading spaces shall be set back a minimum of 25 feet from any street corner. Loading spaces are prohibited in the front yard setback. E. Minimum Size of Loading Spaces. Unless otherwise specified, the first space required shall be not less than 12 feet in width and 50 feet in length. Additional spaces shall be not less than 12 feet in width and 50 feet in length. All loading spaces shall maintain a height of 14 feet or more . Subd. 4 . Required Number of Loading Spaces. Each use specified below shall have, as a minimum, the listed number of loading spaces . A. Auditorium, Convention Hall, Public Buildings, Hospitals, Schools, Hotels, Sports Arena. One loading space 25 feet in length for each building having 1, 000 to 10, 000 square feet of floor area, plus one loading space 50 feet in length for each 10, 000 to 100, 000 square feet of floor area. B. Retail Establishments, Offices. One loading space 25 feet in length for each building having 6, 000 square feet or more of floor area; plus one loading space 50 feet in length for each 25, 000 to 100, 000 square feet of floor area. C. Manufacturing, Fabrication, Processing and Warehousing. One loading space 25 feet in length for each building having 3, 000 square feet of floor area; plus one loading space 50 feet in length for each 25, 000 to 100, 000 square feet of floor area, plus one loading space for each 50, 000 square feet of floor area over the first 100, 000 square feet of floor area. At least half of the loading spaces for buildings above 100, 000 square feet of floor area shall be 50 feet in length. SECTIONS 11.64 - 11.69. Reserved. SEC. 11.70 . SIGNS . Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose cf this section is to protect and promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the City through the establishment cf a comprehensive series of standards, regulations, and procedures governing the erection, use, and display of signs . The provisions of this section are intended to encourage creativity, a reasonable degree of freedom of choice, an opportunity for effective communication, and a sense of concern for the visual amenities on the part cf those designing, displaying, or otherwise utilizing signs, while assuring that the public is not endangered, annoyed, or distracted by the unsafe, disorderly, indiscriminate, or unnecessary use of signs. Subd. 2 . Prohibited Signs. The following signs are prohibited in all zones : A. Abandoned signs. Signs which identify, advertise, or provide direction to a use, business, industry, or service, which has ceased existence or moved from the premises, shall be removed within sixty (60) days of the cessation or relocation of such use, business, industry, or service . B. Signs resembling official signs. Signs resembling official signs, or containing emblems or names resembling official emblems or names, are prohibited unless authorized by a government body. C. Offensive signs. No sign shall contain any indecent or obscene material. Subd. 3 . Safety Provisions. A. Proper attachment. No sign shall be attached to or hang from a building until all necessary wall and/or roof attachments have been approved by the Building Official. B. Shielding illuminated signs. All illuminated signs shall have a shielded light source to prevent glare onto dwellings and public right-of-way. C. Interference with vision. No sign shall obstruct the vision of vehicle drivers or pedestrians at street or driveway intersections. Sight triangles as described in this Chapter shall be unobstructed. D. Distracting signs. Flashing signs, motion signs, revolving signs, revolving beacons, zip flashers, and similar devices are prohibited. A flashing sign is an illuminated sign on which such illumination is not kept constant in intensity or color at all times when such sign is in use. A motion sign is a sign which revolves, rotates, or --cues in any way by mechanical means or wind power, or which gives the illusion of movement . Subd. 4 . Ideological and Non-commercial Signs . Any sign permitted under this section may contain ideological or non-commercial copy in lieu of any other cony. An ideological or non-commercial sign is a sign which does nc: name or advertise a product, service, or business, but only expresses a viewpoint, opinion, idea, or non- commercial message, such as a public service message or a message relating to politics, religion, or charity. Subd. 5 . Location of Sign. A. Free-standing signs . Free-standing signs may advertise only a business, commodity, or service which is located or performed on the lot or parcel of land where the sign is situated. B. Roof signs. Signs erected upon or projecting above the roof line and affixed to a structure are prohibited. C. Window signs. Window signs shall not exceed 25% of the window area cr exceed 32 square feet, whichever is less, except as allowed in the central business (B-3) zone. D. Awnings, canopies, and marquees. Awnings, canopies, and marquees are structures attached to and projecting over the entrance to a building, and made of cloth, metal, or other weather-resistant material . They shall be considered an integral part of the structure to which they are attached. One sign is permitted on each side and the front of an awning, canopy, or marquee. An awning, canopy or marquee shall not be considered part of the wall area for purposes of calculating permissible sign area. Limitations on the size of signs on awnings, canopies, and marquees apply regardless of the number of tenants located within the building. E. Signs over public right-of-way. No signs shall be erected or placed within or over a public right-of-way with the exception of government signs, specified temporary signs, and signs specified in the central business (B-3) zone. F. Signs on natural surfaces or structures. Except for area identification signs, no sign shall be painted, attached, or in any manner affixed to trees, rocks, or similar natural surfaces . No sign of any type shall be painted directly on the wall or roof of a structure, except that mural signs shall be allowed in the central business (B-3) zone, and window signs are allowed. G. Obstructing egress. No sign shall obstruct any window, door, fire escape, or opening intended to provide ingress to or egress from any structure . Subd. 6 . Temporary Signs. Temporary signs in all zones are prohibited except as follows : A. Temporary banners and pennants employed for grand openings of business establishments or special events shall be permitted upon issuance of a temporary sign permit . A special event is an occurrence having a particular purpose which does not occur on a regular basis . Banners and pennants include any attention-getting devices resembling a flag and which are printed or displayed upon paper, canvas, or weather- resistant material, with or without a frame. Business establishments and organizations will be allowed to have any number of temporary banner and pennant permits so long as the aggregate time period for displaying said banners or pennants does not exceed 30 days during any calendar year. No business or organization will be permitted more than one temporary banner or pennant permit at a time. The total sign area for temporary banners or pennants shall not exceed 32 square feet. B. One temporary unilluminated identification sign setting forth the name of the project, architect, engineers, contractors and financing agencies may be installed at a construction site in any zone for the period of construction only. Temporary identification signs shall not exceed 32 square feet in area. Such signs shall be removed within seven (7) days following issuance of a certificate of occupancy. C. Temporary unilluminated real estate signs may be placed in any zone for the purpose of advertising the sale or lease of the property upon which it is placed. Only one such sign is permitted per street frontage. The maximum size of such sign shall be 8 square feet in the rural residential (RR) , low density residential (R-1A) , urban residential (R-1B) , and Old Shakopee residential (R-1C) zones, except that a real estate sign advertising an entire residential development shall not exceed 32 square feet . Real estate signs in all other zones shall not exceed 32 square feet. Real estate signs shall be removed within seven (7) days following the closing of the sale or lease transaction. Signs greater than 8 square feet shall be removed within seven (7) days of the sale or lease or within one (1) year, whichever occurs first. D. A portable sign used for the purpose of directing vehicular or pedestrian traffic may be permitted upon issuance of a temporary sign permit . The sign must be coincidental to, or used in conjunction with, traffic control, and the period of use shall not exceed fourteen (14) days . The sign shall be no larger than 32 square feet and shall be removed within two (2) days after termination of the event or function. Subd. 7 . Directional and Informational Signs . A. Directional signs. Each separately owned tract of land may have one directional sign. Major commercial recreation facilities and business complexes may have one directional sign for each driveway intersecting with a street . Directional signs shall bear no advertising and shall not exceed 4 square feet in area. B. Recreation directional signs. Directional signs about public recreation or major commercial recreation facilities shall not exceed 12 square feet and shall be allowed in the agricultural preservation (AG) , highway business (B-1) , major recreation (MR) , light industry (I-i) , and heavy industry (I-2) zones . C. Public information signs. Public information signs shall be counted as part of the allowable signage provided within the various zones . D. Government signs. Government signs shall be permitted in all zones. Subd. 8. Signs Not Regulated. Signs which are located on the interior of a structure, signs specifically designed to be viewed from within the lot or parcel of land on which they are located and not from a street, national flags, flags of political subdivisions, and holiday decorations are not regulated by this section. Subd. 9 . Residential Zone Regulations. The following signs shall be permitted in the residential zones : A. Nameplate signs. One sign not to exceed 2 square feet for an individual dwelling unit . One sign not to exceed 6 square feet for each group of six to twelve dwelling units. One nameplate sign not to exceed 12 square feet for each group of 13 or more dwelling units. No sign shall have more than two display surfaces. B. Area identification signs. One sign, not to exceed 24 square feet, for each entrance into the project area. C. Free standing signs. Free standing pylon signs are prohibited. D. Governmental, institutional, and recreational signs. One sign or message board per entrance up to a maximum of four per structure for a church or place of worship, public building, institution, public recreation, or commercial recreation facility. Such sign or message board shall not exceed 50 square feet in area and shall be set back at least 10 feet from any right-of-way line . E. Temporary and directional signs. Temporary and directional signs as described above shall be permitted. F. Public recreation directional signs. Public recreation directional signs as described above shall be permitted. Subd. 10. Highway Business, Office Business, and Malor Recreation Zone Regulations. The following signs shall be permitted in the highway business (B-1) , office business (B-2) , and major recreation (MR) zones : A. Wall signs. 1. On the front of a building. Wall signs on the front of a building shall not exceed two square feet for each linear foot of the building wall on which the sign is mounted, up to a maximum of 200 square feet . Business complexes shall be allowed 2 square feet for each linear foot of the building wall on which the sign is mounted up to a maximum of 200 square feet per tenant on the front of a building. The front of the building is the wall of the building with the main entrance. 2 . Not on the front of a building. Wall mounted signs on building walls other than the front if that wall faces a street or there is an entrance on that side of the building. These signs may have one square foot for each linear foot of the building wall on which the sign is mounted up to a maximum of 100 square feet. Business complexes shall be allowed one square foot per linear foot of building wall on which the sign is mounted up to a maximum of 100 square feet per tenant on a side of the building other than the front. B. Free standing and business complex signs. Free standing and business complex signs shall not exceed one square foot per linear foot of street frontage, not to exceed 150 square feet in area. No free standing sign shall exceed 20 feet in height . One sign structure per street frontage shall be permitted. Free standing signs, including temporary ones, having less than ten (10) feet between the bottom of the sign and the ground shall be set back at least ten (10) feet from the right-of-way line. C. Nameplates. One nameplate sign per occupant, not to exceed 2 square feet, shall be allowed. One sign for each building containing multiple tenants, not to exceed 12 square feet, shall be allowed. No sign shall have more than two display surfaces . D. Area identification signs. One sign, not to exceed 50 square feet, for each entrance into the project area . E. Public information signs. One wall or free standing public information sign shall be permitted for each building. F. Temporary and directional signs. Temporary and directional signs as described above shall be permitted. G. Governmental, institutional, and recreational signs. One sign or message board per entrance up to a maximum of four per structure for a church or place of worship, public building, institution, public recreation, or commercial recreation facility. Such sign or message board shall not exceed 50 square feet in area and shall be set back at least 10 feet from any right-of-way line. H. Public recreation directional signs. Public recreation directional signs as described above shall be permitted. I. Major commercial recreation signs. Major commercial recreation uses shall be allowed one free-standing sign per facility or street frontage up to 350 square feet and 30 feet in height from the existing grade when the following requirements have been met : 1. Signs less than 20 feet in height shall include a landscaped area at the base of the sign at least 10 feet in width at the narrowest point and extending at least 5 feet beyond the end of the sign. Signs greater than 20 feet in height shall increase the area to be landscaped by an additional one foot in both length and width for each 2 feet of height in excess of 20 feet; 2 . The bottom of the message portion of the sign shall be not more than 10 feet above the top of the landscaping; 3 . The pylons or support structure of the sign shall be screened with evergreen trees or shrubs; 4. Other durable plantings at least 2 feet in height shall be designed to occupy a minimum of 50 percent of the required landscape area; 5. The required landscape area shall not encroach on the public right-of-way; 6 . The sign and landscape area shall be maintained in a neat, clean and orderly manner; 7 . The facility shall have at least 2 feet of street frontage for each square foot of signage; and 8 . The sign shall not create a health or safety hazard. Subd. 11. Central Business Zone Regulations. The following signs shall be permitted in the central business (B-3) zone : A. Wall signs. 1. On the front of a building. Wall signs on the front of a building shall not exceed 1 . 25 square feet for each linear foot of the building wall on which the sign is mounted, up to a maximum of 150 square feet . Business complexes shall be allowed 1 . 25 square feet for each linear foot of the building wall on which the sign is mounted up to a maximum of 150 square feet per tenant on the front of a building. The front of the building is the wall of the building with the main entrance . 2 . Not on the front of a building. Wall mounted signs on building walls other than the front if that wall faces a street or there is an entrance on that side of the building. These signs may have one square foot for each linear foot of the building wall on which the sign is mounted up to a maximum of 100 square feet . Business complexes shall be allowed one square foot per linear foot of building wall on which the sign is mounted up to a maximum of 100 square feet per tenant on a side of the building other than the front . B. Projecting signs. A projecting sign is a sign, other than a wall sign, which projects from a building wall or structure more than 18 inches at any point . Projecting signs shall be hung at right angles from a building face and shall not project out from the building face more than 36 inches. The bottom of the sign shall allow a minimum of 8 feet clearance. The top of the sign shall not be higher than the lowest point of the roof or parapet of a one-story building. No face of the sign shall exceed 12 square feet. Only one projecting sign is allowed per building face. The sign must be constructed of wood. C. Removable letter signs. A removable letter sign is a sign on which changeable messages may be displayed by the use of removable letters . Removable letter signs shall be permitted but shall not exceed a total area of 24 square feet per sign face . D. Free standing and portable signs. Free-standing signs and portable signs are prohibited except for sandwich board signs which do not exceed 12 square feet per sign face. Sandwich board signs may be placed on the sidewalk directly in front of the establishment during hours of operation only but must not interfere with pedestrian traffic . E. Nameplates. One nameplate sign per occupant, not to exceed 2 square feet, shall be allowed. One sign for each building containing multiple tenants, not to exceed 12 square feet, shall be allowed. No sign shall have more than two display surfaces. F. Area identification signs. One sign, not to exceed 50 square feet, for each entrance into the project area. G. Public information signs. Public information signs are prohibited. H. Temporary and directional signs. Temporary and directional signs as described above shall be permitted. I. Awnings. All portions of any awning sign shall be at least 8 feet above any sidewalk. A valance attached to an awning may extend 12 inches below the roof of the awning at the point of attachment, but in no case shall any portion of a valance be less than 7 feet in height above a sidewalk. Awnings may extend over public property not more than 7 feet from the face of a supporting building, but no portion shall extend nearer than 2 feet to the face of the nearest curb line measured horizontally, nor interfere with public placements in the right-of-way. In no case shall the awning extend over public property more than 2/3 of the distance from the property line to the nearest curb in front of the building. Awning supports shall not extend down into public property. Signs placed on awnings shall be counted as part of the total allowable signage allowed. J. Window signs. Painting or applying letters on building windows shall be permitted. These letters shall be considered as part of the window signage and shall be subject to the regulations of this section. Painted or applied letter signs located on building windows shall not occupy more than 50 percent of the available window area. All other permanent signs located on or within building windows shall not occupy more than 10 percent of the available window area. Temporary signs located on or within building windows shall be allowed for a period not to exceed three (3) months. Total signage within any window shall not be greater than 50 percent of the available window area. Window signs shall be considered the same as wall signs and count toward the total square footage allowed under this section. K. Shared facades. For businesses sharing the same facade, the same or a similar method of signing must be used for all parties desiring to place a sign on the facade. L. Maximum number of items. No more than ten display or line items per sign are allowed. A display item is a symbol, a syllable in a word, or any other item of display that transmits a message. M. Mural signs. Mural signs may be permitted with a conditional use permit . N. Exterior signs limitations. No business shall be allowed more than two permanent exterior signs per building face, excluding nameplate signs and window signs indicating the operating hours of the business. No single sign shall exceed 150 square feet. O. Obscuring architectural features. No sign shall obscure the architectural features of the building to which the sign is attached. P. Extensions. No sign shall extend beyond the ends of the wall to which it is attached. Q. Historic Compatibility. All signs in this zone should be compatible in style and materials with the structure on which they are located and with the architecture in the zone as a whole. Subd. 12 . Industry Zone Regulations. The following signs shall be permitted in the industry zones : A. Wall signs. 1. On the front of a building. Wall signs on the front of a building shall not exceed 2 square feet for each linear foot of the building wall on which the sign is mounted, up to a maximum of 200 square feet . Business complexes shall be allowed 2 square feet for each linear foot of the building wall on which the sign is mounted up to a maximum of 50 square feet per tenant on the front of a building. The front of the building is the wall of the building with the main entrance. 2 . Not on the front of a building. Wall mounted signs on building walls other than the front if that wall faces a street or there is an entrance on that side of the building. These signs may have one square foot for each linear foot of the building wall on which the sign is mounted up to a maximum of 100 square feet . Business complexes shall be allowed one square foot per linear foot of building wall on which the sign is mounted up to a maximum of 50 square feet per tenant on a side of the building other than the front . B. Free standing signs. Free standing signs shall not exceed one square foot per linear foot of street frontage, not to exceed 150 square feet . No free standing sign shall exceed 20 feet in height. One sign per street frontage shall be permitted. Free standing signs, including temporary ones, having less than ten (10) feet between the bottom of the signs and the ground shall be set back at least ten (10) feet from the right- of-way line. C. Nameplates. One nameplate sign per occupant, not to exceed 2 square feet, shall be allowed. One sign for each building containing multiple tenants, not to exceed 12 square feet in area per surface shall be allowed. No sign shall have more than two display surfaces . D. Area identification signs. One sign, not to exceed 50 square feet, for each entrance into the project area. E. Public information signs. One wall or free-standing public information sign shall be permitted for each building. F. Temporary and directional signs. Temporary and directional signs as described above shall be permitted. G. Governmental, institutional, and recreational signs. One sign or message board per entrance up to a maximum of four per structure for a church or place of worship, public building, institution, public recreation, or commercial recreation facility. Such sign or message board shall not exceed 50 square feet in area and shall be set back at least 10 feet from any right-of-way line. H. Recreation directional signs. Directional signs about public recreation or major commercial recreation facilities not exceeding 12 square feet . Subd. 13 . Administration and Enforcement. A. Permit Required. Except as specifically exempted herein, it is unlawful for any person to maintain, install, erect, relocate, or modify any sign without first obtaining a permit. B. Application and Fee. Applications for sign permits shall be made in writing to the Zoning Administrator upon forms furnished by the City. Each application for a permit shall set forth the correct legal description of the tract of land upon which the sign presently exists or is proposed to be located, the location of the sign on said tract of the land, the manner of construction, dimensions of the sign, materials used in the sign, and a complete description and sketch or photograph of the sign. The applicant shall pay the fee set in the most recent Fee Schedule adopted by the City Council . If construction or installation of the sign has not commenced within 120 days from date of issuance of the permit, said permit shall become void. No fee shall be refunded. C. Maintenance. All signs shall be constructed in such a manner and of such material as to be safe and substantial . The exposed backs of all signs and sign structures shall be painted a neutral color. Signs determined by the Building Official to be in a state of disrepair shall be restored to good repair by the sign owner, or the owner of the property on which the sign is situated, within thirty (30) days after the mailing of written notice to repair from the Building Official . In the event of non-compliance with the notice, the City may remove the sign at the expense of the sign owner or the property owner. Subd. 14. Non-Conforming Signs. Signs, including their structures, which do not comply with the provisions of this section are non-conforming and shall be regulated as a non-conforming use. SECTIONS 11.71 - 11.79 . Reserved. SEC. 11. 80 . ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT. Subd. 1. Enforcing Officer. This Chapter shall be administered and enforced by the Zoning Administrator in accordance with its terms, who shall not permit any construction, use, or change of use which does not conform to this Chapter. The Zoning Administrator may designate such additional persons as may be necessary or convenient to assist in administering and enforcing this Chapter. Subd. 2 . Duties of the Zoning Administrator. The Zoning Administrator' s duties shall include the following: A. determine that all building permits comply with the terms of this Chapter; B. conduct inspections of buildings and uses of land to determine compliance with the terms of this Chapter; C. maintain records of all zoning maps, amendments, conditional uses permits, variances, appeals, and other matters regulated by this Chapter; D. administer all applications under this Chapter; E. institute appropriate enforcement proceedings and actions against violators; F. serve as staff advisor to the Planning Commission and the Board of Adjustment and Appeals; G. prepare reports and information for the Planning Commission and the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, and may attend their meetings and participate in their hearings and discussions, but shall not vote on any item before the Planning Commission or the Board of Adjustment and Appeals; and H. perform such other functions as may be necessary to enforce and administer this Chapter. Subd. 3 . Notice. Failure to give notice or to give adequate notice when such is required by this Chapter shall not invalidate any proceeding, provided that a good faith attempt has been made to comply with the notice requirement . Subd. 4. Fees. The fees required by this Chapter shall be those specified in the most recent Fee Schedule adopted by the City Council. Fees are payable at the time of submission of an application and no application shall be deemed to be complete until the fee has been paid. The fee may be waived by the City Council in the case of applications filed in the public interest by the Planning Commission or City Council . SEC. 11. 81. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Subd. 1. Development Standards. A. Frontage Required. A platted lot or parcel of land shall not be developed unless it has frontage on a street, or has access approved through a planned unit development . B. Sewage. A platted lot or parcel of land shall not be developed unless a safe and adequate sewage treatment system can be installed to serve any building. C. Setbacks from Streets. On lots abutting two or more streets, the required front yard setback shall be provided for each side abutting a street . The front yard shall be the side with the shortest street frontage . In the rural residential (RR) , low density residential (R-1A) , urban residential (R-1B) , and medium density residential (R-2) zones the required setback shall be reduced by 10 feet in any yard abutting a street other than the front yard. Subd. 2 . Accessory Structures. A. Constructed After Principal Building. No accessory structure shall be constructed on any residential lot prior to the construction of the principal building to which it is accessory. B. Size. Except in the agricultural preservation (AG) zone, no accessory structure shall exceed the height of the principal building or 15 feet in a residential zone, whichever is less. In the low density residential (R- 1A) , urban residential (R-1B) , Old Shakopee residential (R-1C) , medium density residential (R-2) , and multiple- family residential (R-3) zones, no accessory building shall exceed ten (10) percent of the lot area or exceed 75% of the square footage of the footprint of the principal dwelling, whichever is less. C. Front Yard Setback. Each accessory structure shall be set back at least as far as the principal building on the lot . In the agricultural preservation (AG) and rural residential (RR) zones, no accessory structure may be located closer to the front lot line than the principal buildings or 200 feet, whichever is less. D. Side and Rear Yard Setbacks. An accessory structure shall be set back a minimum of five (5) feet from the side or rear lot line. A garage shall be set back a minimum of twenty (20) feet from the lot line abutting the street or alley where the driveway takes access. Subd. 3 . Required Yards and Open Space. A. No required yard or other open space allocated to one building shall be used to satisfy yard or open space requirements for any other building. B. The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard requirements : 1. Structural or decorative building elements, provided they do nct extend more than 2 feet into a yard. 2 . Yard lights and name plate signs . 3 . Terraces, steps, or similar structures, which do not exceed the height of the main entry door sill and are set back a minimum of five feet from each lot line . In rear yards, fire escapes not to exceed a width of 3 feet, recreational equipment, and permitted off-street parking, provided they are set back a minimum of five feet from each lot line. C. Buildings may be excluded from side yard requirements if party walls are utilized, and the adjacent buildings are planned to be constructed as an integral structure. Subd. 4 . Utility Services. Utility services and utility service structures are exempt from the application of this Chapter when located within public easements . Subd. 5. Number of Buildings Per Lot. Only one principal building shall be located on a lot, unless the lot is subject to a planned unit development or has a conditional use permit for a development containing more than one principal structure per lot . SEC. 11. 82 . PLANNING COMMISSION. Subd. 1. Powers and Duties. The Planning Commission shall provide assistance to the City Council in the administration of this Chapter; and shall review all matters referred to them, including land acquisitions and dispositions, and capital improvements . The Planning Commission shall review and hold public hearings on all applications for official mapping requests, comprehensive plan amendments, and zoning ordinance amendments using the criteria set forth in this ordinance . Subd. 2 . Actions. The Planning Commission shall make recommendations to the City Council on items before it within a reasonable time or such time as shall be prescribed by statute or ordinance . Failure by the Planning Commission to make a recommendation within the required period shall be deemed to be a denial if the delay is appealed by the applicant . The Planning Commission may condition its recommendation in order to effect the intent of this ordinance. The Planning Commission shall accompany its recommendation to deny an application with a statement of its findings regarding the matter. Subd. 3 . City Council Review. The City Council may adopt, modify or reject the recommendation of the Planning Commission by vote of a simple majority of those present, unless otherwise required by statute or this ordinance. Subd. 4 . Land Acquisitions and Dispositions, and Capital Improvements. Prior to the acquisition or disposition of a publicly owned interest in real property within the City, or the authorization of any capital improvement, the Planning Commission shall reviewed the proposed acquisition, disposition, or capital improvement for compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. This requirement applies to proposed acquisition, dispositions, and capital improvements by the City or a special district or agency thereof, or any other political subdivision which has jurisdiction within the City. The Planning Commission shall report its findings in writing to the appropriate City, district, agency, or political subdivision within 45 days. Failure of the Planning Commission to report on the proposal within 45 days, or such other period as may be designated by the City Council, shall be deemed an approval . The City Council may dispense with the requirements of this paragraph when, in its judgment, it finds that the proposal has no relationship to the comprehensive plan. Subd. 5. Official Maps. For the purpose of carrying out the policies of the major thoroughfare plan and the community facilities plan, the Planning Commission may recommend to the City Council a proposed official map covering all or a part of the City. The official map shall identify land needed for future public uses . The City Council may, after holding a public hearing, adopt and amend the official map by ordinance. A notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper at least ten days prior to the date of the hearing. The official map or maps shall be prepared in sufficient detail to permit the establishment of the future acquisition lines on the ground. The accuracy of the future acquisition lines shall be attested to by a registered land surveyor. After adoption, a copy of the official map, or sections thereof with a copy of the adopting ordinance attached, shall be filed with the County Recorder. Subd. 6 . Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission may recommend to the City Council the adoption and amendment from time to time of a comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan may be prepared and adopted in sections, each of which relates to a major subject of the plan or to a major geographical section of the city. The City Council may propose the comprehensive plan and amendments to it by resolution submitted to the Planning Commission. Before adopting the comprehensive plan or any section or amendment of the plan, the Planning Commission shall hold at least one public hearing thereon. A notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City at least ten days before the day of the hearing. A proposed comprehensive plan or an amendment to it may not be acted upon by the City Council until it has received the recommendation of the Planning Commission or until 60 days have elapsed from the date an amendment proposed by the City Council has been submitted to the Planning Commission for its recommendation. The City Council may by resolution by a two-thirds vote of all its members adopt and amend the comprehensive plan or portion thereof. SEC. 11. 83 . ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS. Subd. 1. Initiation. An amendment to the zoning ordinance may be initiated by the City Council, by the Planning Commission, or by application from an affected property owner. Amendments may be in the form of changes to the text of the zoning ordinance or changes to the zoning map. All amendments shall promote the public health, safety, and welfare and be consistent with the comprehensive plan. Subd. 2 . Criteria for Granting a Zoning Ordinance Amendment. The City Council may grant a zoning ordinance amendment when it finds that one or more of the follow criteria exists : A. that the original zoning ordinance is in error; B. that significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place; C. that significant changes in City-wide or neighborhood development patterns have occurred; or D. that the comprehensive plan requires a different provision. An amendment involving a planned unit development or a floodplain overlay zone also must meet the criteria set forth below for that zone. Subd. 3 . Application for Change to Zoning Map. An application for a change to the zoning map may be made by the owner of the property, and shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator on forms provided by the City. The application shall be accompanied by the following: A. a map or plat of the property and the land within 350 feet thereof; B. a list of the names and addresses of the owners of all properties located wholly or partially within 350 feet of the property as such appear on the records of the Scott County Recorder; C. evidence of ownership or an interest in the property; D. the fee. When the request is for the addition or deletion of an overlay zone, the Zoning Administrator may request that the applicant deposit an additional amount up to $1, 000 . 00 for planning, engineering, administrative, and legal expenses incurred by the City for the review and processing of the application, if the Zoning Administrator anticipates that the application will cause the City to incur such expenses. Any portion of the supplemental deposit which is not used to reimburse the City will be refunded to the applicant; E. if the request is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan, the application must be accompanied by an application for an amendment to the comprehensive plan; F. if the request is to add or delete a planned unit development, or to add land to or delete land from the floodplain overlay zone, the additional application information set forth below must be submitted; and G. such other information as may be required by the City. Subd. 4 . Public Hearing. A. Hearing Required. No zoning amendment shall be adopted until a public hearing has been held by the Planning Commission. A notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. Where an amendment involves changes in the boundaries of any zone or the addition or deletion of an overlay zone, a similar notice shall be mailed at least ten (10) days before the day of the hearing to each owner of property situated wholly or partly within 350 feet of the property to which the amendment relates. In the agricultural preservation (AG) and rural residential (RR) zones, and when considering the addition of a mining overlay zone, written notice of the public hearing shall be sent to property owners of record within one-half mile of the property in question. B. Recommendation to City Council. The Planning Commission shall submit its recommendation regarding the rezoning application to the City Council within 60 days following the public hearing, unless an extension is agreed to in writing by the applicant. If no recommendation is transmitted by the Planning Commission within sixty (60) days, the City Council may take action without a Planning Commission recommendation. C. Shoreland and Floodplain Overlay Zones. The Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources shall be given written notice all hearings to consider an amendment to the text or map of the shoreland or floodplain overlay zone at least ten days before the day of the hearing. The notice shall include a draft of the ordinance amendment . Subd. 5. City Council Action. A. Generally. After receipt of the recommendation of the Planning Commission, or after sixty (60) days from the receipt of application without a Planning Commission recommendation, the City Council shall consider and act on the amendment . The City Council shall mail a copy of its decision to any applicant other than the City Council or the Planning Commission. If the City Council fails to make a decision within 120 days, the amendment shall be deemed to have been denied. The City Council may adopt an amendment to this ordinance only upon an affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of its full membership. B. Shoreland Overlay Zone. A copy of any approved zoning amendment affecting land within the shoreland overlay zone shall be sent to the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources within 10 days after final action or approval . Subd. 6 . Reapplication. No amendment which is denied wholly or in part by the City Council shall be resubmitted for a period of six (6) months from the date of denial, except on grounds of new evidence or change of conditions . Subd. 7 . Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Any amendment to the zoning map granted by the City Council shall automatically amend the Comprehensive Plan. Subd. 8 . Special Provisions for Planned Unit Developments. A. Criteria for Granting a Planned Unit Development Application. The City Council shall base its decision to grant or deny an application for a planned unit development upon the following factors : 1. whether the proposed development is consistent in all respects with the comprehensive plan and with this ordinance; 2 . whether the proposed development, including deviations from design standards of the underlying zones, is compatible with surrounding land uses; and 3 . whether the proposed development, including deviations from development standards of the underlying zone, provides adequate open space, circulation, parking, recreation, screening, and landscaping. B. Planned Unit Development Overlay Zone Application. In addition to the information required for any change to the zoning map, a concept plan and a development plan shall be submitted in support of any request to add a planned unit development overlay zone to any land. All plans and maps shall be prepared at the same scale unless otherwise approved by the Zoning Administrator. 1. Concept Plan Review. A concept plan is designed to provide a general overview of the proposed development . The Planning Commission, only, shall review the concept plan to determine whether the proposal generally fits the desired development patterns of the City. A concept plan shall include the following: a. a cover letter describing the project, describing any anticipated variances needed, and describing how the project complies with the City' s comprehensive plan; b. a sketch of the project area, including approximate site size, proposed land uses and their approximate location within the site; surrounding land uses; existing and proposed public right-of-way; and unique, problematic, or desirable features of the site, such as wetlands or forests; c. ownership of the property and identity of developer; d. a general description of how adverse impacts on other property will be mitigated; and e. any other information that will be helpful in reviewing the proposal; 2 . Development Plan Review. The development plan shall include the following: a. a survey of the site prepared by a registered surveyor, showing site size, property lines, and legal description; b. a map showing existing improvements and land ownership on and within 200 feet of the site, including the following: i. the location and width of all streets and easements; ii. the location and size of all existing utilities, including sewers, manholes, watermains, hydrants, and culverts; iii. the location and size of all structures; iv. existing zoning; and v. school district boundary lines. c. a map showing natural conditions on and within 200 feet of the site, including the following: i . contour lines at two (2) foot intervals; ii. soil types and their locations; iii. water features and drainage patterns; iv. vegetation, including a list of tree species; d. a development plan showing the following information: i. proposed uses of land, acreage for each use, recreation and open space areas, a tabulation of density or building square footage, impervious surface percentage, and project phasing and development timing; ii. information on proposed lots, including location, number, square footage, outer dimensions, and dimensions at setbacks; iii. proposed street information, including right-of-way and pavement widths, names, and layout; iv. information on structures, including location and dimensions of both existing and proposed structures; v. proposed parking, driveway, and loading information, including location and dimensions of all driveways, off-street parking facilities, and loading facilities; vi. proposed and existing sidewalks and trails, including location and dimensions; vii. areas proposed to be dedicated to the public, including location, dimensions, and acreage; and viii open space areas and amenities designed to obtain open space credits, including location, dimensions, acreage, and detailed information about any amenities; e. an information table showing density per acre, open space area requirements, and estimated open space credits; f. a utility plan showing the follcwing: i. proposed location and size of sanitary sewer, watermains, storm sewers, and the gradient of each; ii. proposed point of discharge or connection to existing utilities; iii. location and dimensions of proposed and existing easements; and iv. in the rural service area, the location of all proposed or existing wells, a minimum of two septic sites per lot, soil percolation tests, and soil boring tests; g. a stormwater management plan showing the following: i. site grading at two foot contour intervals; ii. proposed stormwater management improvements and techniques; and iii. preliminary stormwater calculations; h. a landscape plan prepared by or under the supervision of a landscape architect showing the following: i. location, size, number, and spacing of all proposed plantings, including common and botanical names; ii. planting schedule by species name and size; iii. any berms, entry monuments, or other landscaping elements; and iv. lighting and signage information, showing the type, height, and location of all exterior lighting and signs; i. a phasing plan showing the timeframe for construction of all improvements; j . preliminary architectural drawings illustrating schematic floor plans, building massing, elevations, structure heights, exterior construction materials, and the typical design and dimension of private yards; k. a traffic analysis prepared by a professional engineer; and 1. such other information as the City Council may require . C. City Council Action. 1. An application for a planned unit development overlay zone may be approved, approved with conditions, or disapproved. The City may impose such conditions as part of the approval of a development plan as it deems necessary in order to ensure consistency with the comprehensive plan and this ordinance . The Zoning Administrator shall maintain a record of all approved plans, amendments, and development agreements . 2 . To the extent necessary to protect the City' s interest, for each planned unit development, the City Attorney shall prepare a development agreement with the developer. The agreement shall specify the terms and conditions of approval and shall be in recordable form. No planned unit development involving a development agreement shall be considered approved until the development agreement has been executed by the City and the developer. D. Amendment. Amendment of a planned unit development shall follow the process for any other zoning ordinance amendment . However, the Planning Commission may approve minor changes to an approved plan upon such hearing and notice, if any, as it deems appropriate. Minor changes are those changes listed below, when these changes do not significantly alter the original overall design, uses, or intent of the development : 1. changes in building location or size which do not affect more than 10% of the site and/or floor space, not to exceed 10, 000 square feet; 2 . changes in landscaping, streets, parking, driveways, or site improvements which do not affect more than 10% of the site area, not to exceed 10, 000 square feet; or 3 . changes in dwelling units which do not result in the number of housing units changing by more than 10% . Subd. 9 . Special Provisions for Floodplain Overlay Zones. In addition to the criteria required for any change to the zoning map, all of the following criteria must be found to exist for before the floodplain overlay zone can be removed from any land: A. any one of the following conditions is satisfied: 1. the original map was in error; 2 . the area has been filled to or above the elevation of the regional flood and is contiguous to lands outside the floodplain; or 3 . the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources has granted a special exception to this rule because the Commissioner determined that, through other measures, lands are adequately protected for the intended use; B. the amendment has been submitted to and approved by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources; and C. the amendment meets the Federal Emergency Management Agency technical conditions and criteria, and has received the approval of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. SEC. 11. 84 . BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS. Subd. 1. Powers and Duties. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall have the following powers and duties : A. to hear requests for conditional use permits; B. to hear requests for variances which are not closely related to a land use application requiring consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council; C. to hear and decide appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any order, requirement, decision or determination made by the Zoning Administrator or any other person in the enforcement of this Chapter; D. to hear and decide requests for expansion of an existing use or structure, reconstruction of a partially destroyed structure, construction of a new structure, or other intensification of a Type B nonconformity, as set forth in Sec . 11 . 91 of this Chapter; and E. to hear requests for shared parking plans, cooperative parking plans, and shared driveways. Subd. 2 . Procedures. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall conduct a public hearing on all conditional use permits, variances, and appeals before it . Notice of the public hearing shall be published in the official newspaper once at least 10 days before the hearing. Any matter involving a variance also shall require mailed notice at least 10 days before the hearing to the applicant and the owners of all property located wholly or partially within 350 feet of the property for which the variance is requested. The Board shall within a reasonable time make a decision regarding any matter before it by adopting findings and shall serve a copy of its decision upon the applicant by mail. Subd. 3 . Combined Parking Facilities. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall review applications for shared parking plans and cooperative parking plans for compliance with the requirements of Sec. 11. 61 of this Chapter. The Board shall approve a shared parking plan or a cooperative parking plan when it finds that such parking plan provides sufficient parking to meet the intent of this Chapter, and is not detrimental to the owners and occupants of the surrounding property. Subd. 4. Shared Driveways. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall review applications for shared driveways for compliance with the requirements of Sec . 11 . 62 of this Chapter. The Board shall approve a shared driveway when it finds that the application meets the intent of this Chapter and is not detrimental to the owners and occupants of the affected property. SEC. 11. 85 . CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS. Subd. 1 . Criteria for Granting Conditional Use Permits . In granting a conditional use permit, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, and general welfare of the occupants of surrounding lands and the City as a whole . The Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall not grant a conditional use permit without making the following findings: A. the use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity; B. the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant property for uses allowed in the area; C. adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and other necessary facilities have been or will be provided; D. the use is consistent with the purposes of the zone in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use; and E. the use is not in conflict with the comprehensive plan. Subd. 2 . Application. Application for a conditional use permit shall be made to the Zoning Administrator on forms provided by the City and shall be accompanied by the following: A. the legal description of the property; B. a list of the names and addresses of the owners of all properties situated wholly or partially within 350 feet of the property as such appear on the records of the Scott County Recorder, or such larger area as specified in the applicable conditional use permit provisions; C. evidence of ownership or an interest in the property; D. the fee; E. a plat or map of the property which shows, at a minimum, all lot lines, existing and proposed structures, driveways, and parking spaces; and F. such other information as may be required by the City. Subd. 3 . Public Hearing. A. Generally. After receipt of a completed application, a date shall be set for a public hearing before the Board of Adjustment and Appeals . Not less than 10 days prior to the public hearing, notice shall be published in the official newspaper, and sent by mail to the applicant and to the owners of all properties located wholly or partially within 350 feet, as reflected in the records of the Scott County Recorder. B. Shoreland Overlay Zone. The Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources shall be given written notice all hearings to consider a conditional use permit in the shoreland overlay zone at least ten days before the day of the hearing. Subd. 4 . Decision. A. Generally. Following the hearing or any continuance which is not appealed by the applicant, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall make a decision on the request for a conditional use permit . Conditional use permits may be approved by the affirmative vote of a simple majority of those present . If the Board denies a conditional use permit, it shall make a finding and determination that the conditions required for approval do not exist . All decisions by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals are final subject to appeal to the City Council . B. Shoreland Overlay Zone. A copy of any approved conditional use permit affecting land within the shoreland overlay zone shall be sent to the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources within 10 days after final action or approval . Subd. 5 . Appeal. Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals regarding a conditional use permit may have such decision reviewed by the City Council if a request for review is submitted to the Zoning Administrator within 10 days of the date of the decision. The appeal shall be in writing and shall include a statement of the alleged errors or omissions of the Board. Subd. 6 . Additional Conditions. In granting a conditional use permit or altering an existing conditional use permit, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals or the City Council may impose conditions in addition to those specified in this Chapter in order to preserve the health, safety, or welfare of the community or in order to implement the purposes of this Chapter or the comprehensive plan. Subd. 7 . Amendment; Reapplication. A request for an amended conditional use permit shall be administered in a manner similar to that required for a new conditional use permit . An amendment shall include requests for any change in the terms or conditions of the conditional use permit . If an application for a conditional use permit is denied, no application for the same or essentially the same conditional use permit shall be resubmitted for a period of six (6) months from the date of denial . Subd. 8 . Recording. A copy of the conditional use permit shall be filed by the City with the Scott County Recorder. The permit shall contain a legal description of the property. Subd. 9 . Term. A conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as the conditions agreed upon are observed. A conditional use permit shall become void if it is not used within one year of the date of final action by the City. A conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 6 or more months . Time shall be calculated as beginning on the day following the last day in which the use was in normal operation, or following the date of final City action, and shall run continuously thereafter. Subd. 10 . Revocation. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals may review conditional use permits periodically and may revoke a permit upon violation of any condition of the permit, requirement of this Chapter, or violation of state or federal law or regulation. If it is discovered after approval of the conditional use permit that the Board' s decision was based at least in part on fraudulent information, the Board may revoke the conditional use permit, modify the conditions, or impose additional conditions to ensure compliance with this Chapter. Subd. 11. Construction During Appeal Period. Any applicant who obtains a building permit and starts construction after the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, but prior to the termination of the appeal period, assumes the risk that the decision may be reversed upon appeal . When an appeal is received by the City, the applicant will be notified of the appeal and informed of the date of the City Council meeting at which it will be heard. Subd. 12 . Violations. No person shall violate, fail to comply with, or assist, direct, or permit the violation of the terms or conditions of a conditional use permit. Subd. 13 . Special Provisions in the Floodplain Overlay Zone. A. Criteria. In the floodplain overlay zone the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall not grant a conditional use permit without considering the following factors: 1. the danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments; 2 . the danger that materials may be swept onto other lands or downstream to the injury of others or that they may block bridges, culverts or other hydraulic structures; 3 . :.he proposed water and sewer systems, and the ability of these systems to prevent disease, contamination, and unsanitary conditions; 4. the susceptibility of the proposed use, any structures, and their contents to flood damage, and the effect of such damage on the individual owner; 5 . the importance to the City of the services provided by the proposed use; 6 . the need for a waterfront location; 7 . the availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding for the proposed use; 8 . the compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and development anticipated in the foreseeable future; 9 . the relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and floodplain management program for the area; 10 . the safety of access to the property in times of flood for emergency and other vehicles; 11. the expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at the site; and 12 . other factors relevant to the purposes of this Chapter. B. Application. In addition to the requirements above, application for a conditional use permit in the floodplain overlay zone shall be accompanied by information sufficient to allow the City to determine the regulatory flood protection elevation, and whether the proposed use is in the floodway or the flood fringe area. Such information may include the following: 1. A typical valley cross-section showing the channel of the stream, elevation of land areas adjoining each side of the channel, cross-sectional areas to be occupied by the proposed development, and high water information; 2 . A plans drawn to scale showing elevations or contours of the ground, existing and proposed structures, fill, or storage of materials; location and elevations of streets; existing land uses and vegetation upstream and downstream; and soil type; and 3 . A profile showing the slope of the bottom of the channel or flow line of the stream for at least 500 feet in either direction from the proposed development . C. In the information submitted to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, the Zoning Administrator shall include an evaluation of the proposed project in relation to flood heights and velocities, the seriousness of flood damage to the use, and the adequacy of the plans for protection. D. The City shall determine whether the proposed use is in the floodway or flood fringe area, and determine the regulatory flood protection elevation. This determination includes the following: 1. an estimation of the peak discharge of the regional flood; 2 . a calculation of the water surface profile of the regional flood based upon a hydraulic analysis of the stream channel and overbank areas; and 3 . a computation of the floodway necessary to convey or store the regional flood without increasing flood stages more than 0 . 5 foot . A lesser stage increase than 0 . 5 foot shall be required if, as a result of the additional stage increase, greater flood damages would result . An equal degree of encroachment on both sides of the stream within the reach shall be assumed in computing floodway boundaries. An "equal degree of encroachment" is a method of determining the location of floodway boundaries so that floodplain areas on both sides of a stream are capable of conveying a proportionate share of flood flows . E. The Zoning Administrator shall present these technical determinations to the Planning Commission and the City Council . The City Council shall accept the technical evaluation and the recommended floodway or flood fringe area boundary, or deny the permit application. The City Council, prior to official action, may submit the application and all supporting data and analysis to the Federal Emergency Management Agency or the Department of Natural Resources. SEC. 11. 86. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONES . Subd. 1 . Purpose. It is in the intent of the City in establishing general and specific criteria for conditional uses that such uses be subject to careful evaluation to ensure that their location and design are consistent with the standards, purposes and procedures of this Chapter and the comprehensive plan, and do not have a detrimental impact on neighboring properties . The Board of Adjustment and Appeals may impose conditions on such uses in order to ensure compliance or to effect the purpose of this Chapter. Subd. 2 . Specific Standards in the Residential Zones. In addition to the standards specified in Sec . 11 . 85 of this Chapter, no conditional use permit shall be granted in the residential zones unless the Board of Adjustment and Appeals determines that all of the specific standards contained in this subdivision will be met : A. agricultural research facilities : 1. shall provide evidence that the research facility' s work will not present a hazard to plants or animals on adjacent properties; 2 . shall screen all exterior storage from any adjacent residential uses; and 3 . shall landscape all structures and parking facilities. B. animal hospitals and veterinary clinics : 1. shall not be located on a lot or parcel of land adjacent to any low density residential (R-1A) , urban residential (R-1B) , or Old Shakopee residential (R-1C) zone; 2 . shall submit a plan for the disposal of all wastes; 3 . shall have all animals attended and leashed during exercise runs; and 4. shall landscape all structures and parking facilities . C. bed and breakfast inns : 1. shall meet all requirements of the Minnesota Department of Health; 2 . if providing meals, shall serve them only to guests renting a room; 3 . shall provide off-street parking which is screened in accordance with Sec . 11 . 60 ; 4 . shall be the residence of the owner or operator; and 5 . shall landscape all structures and parking facilities . D. boathouses : 1. shall not be designed or used for human habitation; 2 . shall not contain sanitary facilities; 3 . shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from the ordinary high water level; 4 . shall not occupy an area greater than 250 square feet; 5. shall be constructed or screened to reduce visibility from public waters and adjacent shorelands through the use of vegetation, topography, color or increased setback, assuming summer leaf-on conditions; and 6. if located on shorelands adjacent to recreational development waterbodies, shall not occupy an area greater than 400 square feet . The width of the structure shall not exceed 20 feet as measured parallel to the shoreline. E. cemeteries : 1. shall have a minimum lot size of five acres; 2 . shall be located adjacent to an arterial or collector street as identified, in the comprehensive plan; and 3 . shall be screened to a height of 3 feet . F. churches and other places of worship: 1. shall be located adjacent to an arterial or collector street as identified in the comprehensive plan; 2 . shall have parking facilities set back 15 feet from residential property; 3 . shall screen parking facilities adjacent to residential property with a berm and/or landscaping to a minimum height of 3 feet; and 4 . shall have an impervious surface percent of no more than 70 percent, and the remainder of the site shall be landscaped. G. commercial feed lots : 1. shall be a minimum of 1320 feet from any residential zone other than agricultural preservation (AG) ; and 2 . shall comply with all requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency with regard to the disposal of waste. H. commercial recreation, minor: 1. shall be located adjacent to an arterial or collector street as identified in the comprehensive plan; 2 . shall have all buildings set back 50 feet from all property lines; and 3 . shall landscape all structures and parking facilities. I. day care facilities serving 13 through 16 persons : 1. shall not have any external building changes or improvements which alter the original character of the house; 2 . shall have drop-off and pick-up areas located outside of the public right-of-way, and designed to enhance vehicular and pedestrian safely; 3 . shall have outdoor play areas located and designed to minimize visual and noise impacts on adjacent residential uses; and 4 . shall be on a site served by public water and sanitary sewer. J. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot : 1. shall be on a lot that meets all design standards and public improvement requirements prescribed by Chapter 12; 2 . shall be designed and placed to facilitate ingress, egress, and overall circulation, both for the development as a whole and for the individual buildings and structures within the development; and 3 . shall consist of structures that are owned, maintained, and operated under unified control in accordance with a plan which contain provisions providing for the enforcement thereof . K. flood fringe area storage of materials or equipment below the regulatory flood protection elevation, if, in time of flooding, the materials or equipment are buoyant, flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life, shall submit a plan for removal of the materials and equipment from the area within the time available after a flood warning. L. floodway area structures accessory to a permitted or conditional use: 1. shall not cause any increase in the stage of a 100- year or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected; 2 . shall not be designed for human habitation; 3 . shall be constructed and placed on the building site so as to offer the minimum obstruction to the flow of flood waters . Whenever possible, structures shall be constructed with the longitudinal axis parallel to the direction of flood flow. So far as practicable, structures shall be placed approximately on the same flood flow lines as those of adjoining structures; 4. shall be elevated on fill or structurally dry flood proofed in accordance with the FP-1 or FP-2 flood proofing classifications in the State Building Code. As an alternative, an accessory structure may be flood proofed to the FP-3 or FP-4 flood proofing classification in the State Building Code provided the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment, does not exceed 500 square feet in size, and for a detached garage, the detached garage must be used solely for parking of vehicles and limited storage. All flood proofed accessory structures must meet the following additional standards, as appropriate : a. The structure must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure and shall be designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls; and b. Any mechanical and utility equipment in the structure must be elevated to or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or properly flood proofed. M. floodway area placement of fill : 1 . shall not cause any increase in the stage of a 100- year or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected; 2 . shall not include spoil from dredging, or sand and gravel mining operations, unless a long-term site development plan is submitted which includes an erosion and sedimentation prevention element; and 3 . shall be protected from erosion by vegetative cover, mulching, rip rap, or other acceptable method. N. floodway area storage yards for equipment, machinery, or materials : 1. shall not cause any increase in the stage of a 100- year or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected; 2 . shall not include any material that, in time of flooding, is flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life; and 3 . shall be limited to materials or equipment which is readily removable from the area within the time available after a flood warning and in accordance with a plan approved by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. 0. floodway area uses including (1) mining and storage of sand, gravel, and other mined materials; (2) marinas, boat rentals, docks, piers, wharves, and water control structures; (3) railroads, streets, bridges, utility transmission lines, and pipelines; (4) campgrounds with facilities for recreational vehicles; and (5) other uses similar to those permitted, shall not cause any increase in the stage of a 100-year or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected. P. floodway area structural works for flood control such as levees, dikes, and floodwalls constructed to any height where the intent is to protect individual structures, and levees cr dikes where the intent is to protect agricultural crops for a frequency flood event equal to or less than the 10-year frequency flood event : 1. shall be subject to the provisions of Minn. Stat . Chapter 105, if they will change the course, current, or cross-section of protected wetlands or public waters; 2 . shall be prohibited if they are community-wide structural works for flood control intended to remove areas from the regulatory flood plain; and 3 . shall not cause an increase to the 100-year or regional flood. The technical analysis must assume equal conveyance or storage loss on both sides of a stream. Q. funeral homes : 1. the structure shall be of an architectural style which is compatible with any adjacent residential use; and 2 . shall landscape all structures and parking facilities. R. home occupations: 1. shall not have any retail sales activity; 2 . shall have a maximum of one sign, not to exceed 2 square feet; 3 . shall have a maximum of one employee who does not reside in the home; 4. shall provide off-street parking for the employee; 5. shall have no outside storage; 6. shall not produce offensive noise, vibration, electrical interference, or air or other pollution; 7 . shall not have any receipt or delivery of merchandise, goods or supplies except through the United States mail, similar parcel delivery service, or personal vehicles not exceeding 1 ton; and 8. may have outside off-street parking of no more than one commercial vehicle or vehicle identified for business purposes, not to exceed one ton capacity which is used for both personal and business transportation. The vehicle shall be owned by and registered to an occupant of the property and parked in a screened location. S. hospitals or clinics : 1 . shall not be located on a lot or parcel of land adjacent to any low density residential (R-1A) or urban residential (R-1B) zone; 2 . shall be located adjacent to an arterial or collector street as identified in the comprehensive plan; 3 . shall have parking facilities set back 15 feet from streets and non-residential property, and 25 feet from residential property; 4. shall have an impervious surface percent of no more than 70 percent, and the remainder of the site shall be suitably landscaped; and 5. shall not have any emergency vehicle access adjacent to or located across a street from any residential use. T. kennels: 1. shall submit a plan for the disposal of all waste; 2 . shall have all animals attended and leashed during exercise runs; and 3 . shall landscape all structures and parking facilities. U. mining: 1. shall provide the City with the exact legal description and acreage of area to be mined; 2 . shall provide the City with an aerial photograph of the site prior to any mining; 3 . shall provide the City with the following maps of the entire site and all areas within 500 feet of the site, drawn at a scale of one (1) inch to one hundred (100) feet: a. Map A - Existing conditions to include: i. contour lines at two (2) foot intervals; ii. existing vegetation; iii . existing drainage and permanent water areas; iv. existing structures; v. existing wells; and vi. cross-sectional views from each direction; b. Map B - Proposed operations to include : i. structures to be erected; ii. location of sites to be mined showing the maximum depth of proposed excavation; iii. location of tailings deposits showing maximum height of deposits; iv. location of machinery to be used in the mining operation; v. location of storage of mined materials, showing height of storage deposits; vi. location of parking facilities; vii. location of storage of explosives; viii.erosion and sediment control structures; ix. location of proposed wells, and the depth to the water table; x. location of proposed washing operations; xi. a mining quantities table showing the quantity and type of materials expected to be mined in each phase and each year; and xii. cross-sectional views of the site during each phase from each direction; c. Map C - End use plan to include: i. final grade of proposed site showing elevations and contour lines at two (2) foot intervals; ii. location and species of vegetation to be replanted; iii. location and nature of any structures to be erected in relation to the end use plan; and iv. cross-sectional views of the site after final grading; 4 . shall provide the City with a full and adequate description of all phases of the proposed operation to include an estimate of duration of the mining operation; 5. shall provide a dust control plan detailing the methods proposed for controlling dust, application rates and time frames, and volumes of water to be used; 6 . shall pave or gravel all roads which are within 450 feet of any other zone to minimize dust conditions; 7 . shall provide a noise control plan showing all occupied structures within 1000 feet of the mining site, existing noise contours in 5 dB intervals, and noise contours anticipated during operations for each phase; 8. shall provide a vibration control plan; 9 . shall provide a landscape plan prepared by or under the supervision of a landscape architect showing material types, common and botanical names, sizes, number, and location of proposed plantings; 10. shall provide lighting and signage plans showing the type, height, and location of all exterior lighting and signs; 11. shall provide a stormwater management plan showing the stormwater contour lines and drainage patterns prior to, during, and after mining, stormwater runoff calculations, and indicating that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency' s Best Management Practices shall be followed; 12 . shall provide a traffic analysis prepared by a professional engineer showing the following: a. existing traffic volumes on affected streets; b. anticipated traffic volumes on affected streets; c. anticipated trip generation for each phase or operations change; d. morning and afternoon peak hour traffic volumes at all driveways into the site; e. recommended traffic improvements both on and off the site; and f. recommended traffic management actions, including truck routing; 13 . shall complete an environmental assessment worksheet; 14 . if adjacent to a residential zone or within 300 feet of two (2) or more residential structures, shall be bound by the following standards : a. where water collects to a depth of one and one-half (1 1/2) feet or more, for at least one (1) month, and occupies an area of 700 square feet or more, all access to such water shall be barred by a fence or other barrier at least four (4) feet in height; and b. where slopes occur that are steeper than one (1) foot vertical to three (3) feet horizontal, for a period of one (1) month or more, all access to such slopes shall be barred by a fence or other barrier at least four (4) feet in height; 15. shall screen the mining site from adjacent residential or business uses. The mining site also shall be screened from any street within 500 feet. The screening shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in height, and planted with a fast growing species. Existing trees and ground cover along street frontage shall be preserved, maintained, and supplemented for the depth of the street yard setback, except where traffic safety requires cutting and trimming; 16. shall cut or trim weeds and any other unsightly or noxious vegetation as may be necessary to preserve a reasonably neat appearance and to prevent seeding on adjoining property; 17. shall not interfere with surface water drainage beyond the boundaries of the mining operation. The mining operation shall not adversely affect the quality of surface or subsurface water resources . Surface water originating outside and passing through the mining site shall, at its point of departure from the mining site, be of equal quality to or better quality than the water at the point where it enters the mining site . The mining operator shall perform any water treatment necessary to comply with this provision; 18. shall conduct all operations between the hours of 7 : 00 a.m. and 7 : 00 p.m. Shorter hours may be established in the conditional use permit; 19 . for a gravel mine, shall have a maximum area without ground cover or being mined at one time not to exceed twenty (20) acres; and 20 . immediately after operations have ceased, shall be restored in compliance with the following: a. within a period of three (3) months after the termination of a mining operation, or within three (3) months after abandonment of such operation for a period of six months, all mining structures shall be dismantled and removed by, and at the expense of, the mining operator last operating such structures; b. the peaks and depressions of the area shall be graded and backfilled to a surface which will result in gently rolling topography in substantial conformity to the land area immediately surrounding the mining site, and which will minimize erosion due to rainfall . No finished slope shall exceed eighteen percent (18%) in grade; and c. restored areas shall be sodded or surfaced with soil of a quality at least equal to the topsoil of land areas immediately surrounding the mining site, and to a depth of at least six (6) inches, or a greater depth if recommended by the Scott County Soil and Water Conservation District . Such required topsoil shall be planted with legumes and grasses. Trees and shrubs also may be planted, but not as a substitute for legumes and grasses . Such planting shall be done in conformity with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency' s Best Management Practices to adequately retard soil erosion. Excavations completed to a water producing depth need not be backfilled if the water depth is at least ten (10) feet, and if banks shall be sloped to a water line at a slope no greater than three (3) feet horizontal to one (1) foot vertical . The finished grade shall be such that it will not adversely affect the surrounding land or future development of the site upon which mining operations have been conducted. The finished plan shall restore the mining site to a condition whereby it can be utilized for the type of land use proposed to occupy the site after mining operations cease . V. multiple-family dwellings containing up to 6 units : 1. shall have a minimum lot size of 24, 000 square feet; 2 . shall screen parking facilities to a minimum height of 3 feet; 3 . the structure shall be of an architectural style which is compatible with any adjacent residential use; and 4 . shall landscape all structures and parking facilities. W. nursing homes: 1. shall be located adjacent to an arterial or collector street as identified in the comprehensive plan, or otherwise located so that access can be provided without conducting significant traffic on local residential streets; 2 . shall have parking facilities set back 15 feet from streets and non-residential property, and 25 feet from residential property; and 3 . shall have an impervious surface percent of no more than 60 percent, and the remainder of the site shall be suitably landscaped. X. public or private schools having a course of instruction approved by the Minnesota Department of Education for students enrolled in K through grade 12, or any portion thereof: 1. shall be located adjacent to an arterial or collector street as identified in the comprehensive plan, or otherwise located so that access can be provided without conducting significant traffic on local residential streets; 2 . shall have all buildings set back 50 feet from all property lines; 3 . shall have parking facilities set back 15 feet from streets and non-residential property, and 25 feet from residential property; 4 . shall have b•us drop-off and pick-up areas located outside of the public right-of-way, and designed to enhance vehicular and pedestrian safely; 5. shall have recreational areas designed for group sports activities set back 25 feet from residential property, with adequate screening to protect neighboring properties from noise and adverse visual impacts; 6. shall not have any lighted playing fields unless the visual impact on residential areas can be substantially mitigated; and 7 . shall have an impervious surface percent of no more than 60 percent, and the remainder of the site shall be suitably landscaped. Y. relocated structures : 1. shall have a moving permit from the City under City Code Sec . 4 . 08; 2 . prior to moving, shall have given cash, cashier' s check, or letter of credit as a financial guarantee to the City to ensure completion of all work. The financial guarantee shall be in an amount equal to the Building Official' s estimate of the cost to bring the structure into compliance with the Building Code; 3 . shall meet all requirements of the Building Code within six months after moving; and 4. if the structure is not in full compliance with the Building Code after six months after moving, the City, in its sole discretion, may drawn on the financial guarantee and take whatever steps it deems necessary to bring the relocated structure into compliance with the Building Code. In the event the City draws on the financial guarantee, 10% of the total guarantee shall be paid to the City as its administrative fee. Z. residential facilities serving 7 through 16 persons : 1. shall not have any external building changes or improvements which alter the original character of the house; any new structure shall be of an architectural style which is compatible with adjacent residential uses; 2 . shall have adequate off-street parking based on the number of employees, visitors, and residents who will be driving, which parking shall be screened from view from residential uses; and 3 . shall be served by public water and sanitary sewer. AA. retail sales of nursery and garden supplies : 1. shall have adequate off-street parking based on the usual number of employees and customers per day; 2 . shall have immediate removal and sanitary disposal of dead or diseased plant materials; and 3 . shall have no over-night storage of equipment used for planting or transplanting landscaping materials. BB. riding academies : 1. shall submit a plan for the disposal of all waste; 2 . shall have a maximum of one horse per acre; and 3 . shall landscape all structures and parking facilities. CC. seasonal produce stands when the principal use of the property is agricultural : 1. any goods sold shall be the product of the specific farm or garden; 2. the stand shall be set back 15 feet from any street right-of-way; and 3. adequate parking facilities shall be provided in order to prevent a traffic hazard. DD. structures over the specified height: 1. shall submit a map showing shading patterns created by the over height structure; and 2. shall be set back from each property line a distance equal to half the structure height. BE. utility service structures. All utility service structures except water towers and electrical substations shall be subject to the following: 1. shall be less than 400 square feet in area; 2 . shall be less than 15 feet in height; 3 . may only be used to provide weather protection for utility equipment; and 4 . shall be designed, placed, and landscaped as necessary to assure that it blends in with the neighboring uses, and is unobtrusive . FF. wind energy conversation system or windmills : 1. shall be set back from the nearest property line a distance equal to the height of the tower plus one- half the diameter of the rotor; 2 . shall be certified by a professional engineer as being of a design adequate for the atmospheric conditions of the Twin Cities; 3 . shall be equipped with overspeed or similar controls designed to prevent disintegration of the rotor in high winds; and 4. shall comply with all building and electrical code requirements of the City, the noise regulations of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the rules and regulations of the Federal Communications Commission and Federal Aviation Administration. SEC. 11. 87 . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS FOR BUSINESS ZONES. Subd 1 . Purpose. It is the intent of the City in establishing general and specific criteria for conditional uses that such uses be subject to careful evaluation to ensure that their location and design are consistent with the standards, purposes and procedures of this Chapter and the comprehensive plan, and do not have a detrimental impact on neighboring properties . The Board of Adjustment and Appeals may impose conditions on such uses in order to ensure compliance or to effect the purpose of this Chapter. Subd. 2 . Specific Standards for Business Zones. In addition to the standards specified in Sec . 11 . 85 of this Chapter, no conditional use permit shall be granted in the business zones unless the Board of Adjustment and Appeals determines that each of the following specific standards will be met : A. administrative, executive, and professional offices : 1. shall be an integral part of a permitted principal use; and 2 . shall display no signage visible from off-site. B. animal hospitals and veterinary clinics shall not be located on a lot or parcel of land adjacent to any low density residential (R-1A) , urban residential (R-1B) , or Old Shakopee residential (R-1C) zone. C. bed and breakfast inns: 1. shall meet all requirements of the Minnesota Department of Health; 2 . if providing meals, shall serve them only to guests renting a room; 3 . shall provide off-street parking which is screened in accordance with Sec. 11. 60; and 4. shall be the residence of the owner or operator. D. boathouses: 1. shall not be designed or used for human habitation; 2 . shall not contain sanitary facilities; 3 . shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from the ordinary high water level; 4. shall not occupy an area greater than 250 square feet; 5 . shall be constructed or screened to reduce visibility from public waters and adjacent shorelands through the use of vegetation, topography, color or increased setback, assuming summer leaf-on conditions; and 6 . if located on shorelands adjacent to recreational development waterbodies, shall not occupy an area greater than 400 square feet . The width of the structure shall not exceed 20 feet as measured parallel to the shoreline . E. bus terminals and taxi stands : 1. shall be located adjacent to an arterial street as identified in the comprehensive plan; and 2 . may not be located on a lot or parcel of land adjacent to any rural residential (RR) , low density residential (R-1A) , urban residential (R-1B) , or Old Shakopee residential (R-1C) zone. F. car washes: 1. shall be located adjacent to an arterial street as identified in the comprehensive plan; 2 . shall be screened from view from residential zones; 3 . shall utilize a water conservation or recovery system; and 4. shall provide stacking for at least three vehicles per aisle. The required stacking shall not interfere with internal circulation patterns or with designated parking facilities, and shall not be located in any public right-of-way, private access easement, or within the required parking setback. G. churches and other places of worship: 1. shall be located adjacent to an arterial or collector street as identified in the comprehensive plan; 2 . shall have parking facilities set back 15 feet from residential property; 3 . shall screen parking facilities adjacent to residential property with a berm and/or landscaping to a minimum height of 3 feet; and 4 . shall have an impervious surface percent of no more than 70 percent, and the remainder of the site shall be landscaped. H. commercial recreation, major or minor: 1. shall be located adjacent to an arterial or collector street as identified in the comprehensive plan; and 2 . shall have all parking screened from adjacent residential zones . I. commercial recreation, minor, but limited to health and athletic facilities : 1. shall limit hours of operation to between 6 : 00 a.m. and 11 :00 p.m. ; 2 . the structure shall be of an architectural style which is compatible with neighboring structures; and 3 . shall have no facilities outside a building. J. day care facilities: 1. shall have drop-off and pick-up areas located outside of the public right-of-way, and designed to enhance vehicular and pedestrian safely; and 2 . shall have outdoor play areas located and designed to mitigate visual and noise impacts on adjoining residential uses. K. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot : 1. shall be on a lot that meets all design standards and public improvement requirements prescribed by Chapter 12; 2 . shall be designed and placed to facilitate ingress, egress, and overall circulation, both for the development as a whole and for the individual buildings and structures within the development; and 3 . shall consist of structures that are owned, maintained, and operated under unified control in accordance with a plan which contain provisions providing for the enforcement thereof. L. flood fringe area storage of materials or equipment below the regulatory flood protection elevation, if, in time of flooding, the materials or equipment are buoyant, flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life, shall submit a plan for removal of the materials and equipment from the area within the time available after a flood warning. M. floodway area structures accessory to a permitted or conditional use: 1. shall not cause any increase in the stage of a 100- year or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected; 2 . shall not be designed for human habitation; 3 . shall be constructed and placed on the building site so as to offer the minimum obstruction to the flow of flood waters . Whenever possible, structures shall be constructed with the longitudinal axis parallel to the direction of flood flow. So far as practicable, structures shall be placed approximately on the same flood flow lines as those of adjoining structures; 4. shall be elevated on fill or structurally dry flood proofed in accordance with the FP-1 or FP-2 flood proofing classifications in the State Building Code. As an alternative, an accessory structure may be flood proofed to the FP-3 or FP-4 flood proofing classification in the State Building Code provided the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment, does not exceed 500 square feet in size, and for a detached garage, the detached garage must be used solely for parking of vehicles and limited storage. All flood proofed accessory structures must meet the following additional standards, as appropriate: a. The structure must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure and shall be designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls; and b. Any mechanical and utility equipment in the structure must be elevated to or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or properly flood proofed. N. floodway area placement of fill : 1 . shall not cause any increase in the stage of a 100- year cr regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected; 2 . shall not include spoil from dredging, or sand and gravel mining operations, unless a long-term site development plan is submitted which includes an erosion and sedimentation prevention element; and 3 . shall be protected from erosion by vegetative cover, mulching, rip rap, or other acceptable method. 0. floodway area storage yards for equipment, machinery, or materials : 1. shall not cause any increase in the stage of a 100- year or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected; 2 . shall not include any material that, in time of flooding, is flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life; and 3 . shall be limited to materials or equipment which is readily removable from the area within the time available after a flood warning and in accordance with a plan approved by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. P. floodway area uses including (1) mining and storage of sand, gravel, and other mined materials; (2) marinas, boat rentals, docks, piers, wharves, and water control structures; (3) railroads, streets, bridges, utility transmission lines, and pipelines; (4) campgrounds with facilities for recreational vehicles; and (5) other uses similar to those permitted, shall not cause any increase in the stage of a 100-year or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected. Q. floodway area structural works for flood control such as levees, dikes, and floodwalls constructed to any height where the intent is to protect individual structures, and levees or dikes where the intent is to protect agricultural crops for a frequency flood event equal to or less than the 10-year frequency flood event : 1. shall be subject to the provisions of Minn. Stat . Chapter 105, if they will change the course, current, or cross-section of protected wetlands or public waters; 2 . shall be prohibited if they are community-wide structural works for flood control intended to remove areas from the regulatory flood plain; and 3 . shall not cause an increase to the 100-year or regional flood. The technical analysis must assume equal conveyance or storage loss on both sides of a stream. R. funeral homes : 1. the structure shall be of an architectural style which is compatible with any adjacent residential use; and 2 . shall landscape all structures and parking facilities. S. gas stations : 1. shall be screened from any adjacent residential zone; 2 . shall not store any vehicles which are unlicensed and inoperable on the premises, except in appropriately designed and screened storage areas; 3 . shall conduct all repair, assembly, disassembly, and maintenance of vehicles within a building, except minor maintenance such as tire inflation, adding oil, and wiper replacement; 4. shall not have a public address system which is audible from any residential property; 5. shall provide stacking for gas pumps for at least one car beyond the pump island in each direction in which access can be gained to the pump. The required stacking shall not interfere with internal circulation patterns or with designated parking facilities, and shall not be located in any public right-of-way, private access easement, or within the required parking setback; and 6 . shall not sell, store, or display any used vehicles. T. health and athletic facilities : 1. shall limit hours of operation to between 6 : 00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. ; 2 . the structure shall be of an architectural style which is compatible with neighboring structures; and 3 . shall have no facilities outside a building. U. horse care uses including boarding, training, showing, grooming and veterinary clinic facilities : 1. shall not be located on a lot or parcel of land adjacent to any low density residential (R-1A) , urban residential (R-1B) , or Old Shakopee residential (R-1C) zone; and 2 . shall submit a plan for the disposal of all wastes . V. hospitals : 1. shall not be located on a lot or parcel of land adjacent to any low density residential (R-1A) or urban residential (R-1B) zone; 2 . shall have direct access to a collector or arterial street as identified in the comprehensive plan; 3 . shall have parking facilities set back 15 feet from streets and non-residential property, and 25 feet from residential property; 4. shall have an impervious surface percent of no more than 70 percent, and the remainder of the site shall be suitably landscaped; and 5. shall not have any emergency vehicle access adjacent to or located across a street from any residential use. W. hotels and motels shall not be located on a lot or parcel of land adjacent to any low density residential (R-1A) , urban residential (R-1B) , or Old Shakopee residential (R- 1C) zone. X. hotels, motels and conference centers: 1. shall be screened from any adjacent residential zone; 2 . the structure shall be of an architectural style which is compatible with neighboring structures; 3 . shall not increase traffic congestion on streets; and 4 . shall have direct access to a collector or arterial street as identified in the comprehensive plan. Y. multiple-family housing: 1. shall screen all parking to a height of three (3) feet; 2 . the structure shall be of an architectural style which is compatible with neighboring structures; and 3 . shall have a minimum lot size of 24, 000 square feet . Z. open sales lots or any use having exterior storage of goods for sale: 1. shall be screened from any adjacent residential zone; 2 . shall not have a public address system which is audible from any residential property; 3 . shall be kept neat and orderly; 4. shall not have any uses in any required front, side, or rear yard setback, or in any required parking area; and 5. shall not block any sidewalk. AA. parking facilities open to the public shall not be located adjacent to any low density residential (R-1A) , urban residential (R-1B) , or Old Shakopee residential (R- 1C) zone. BB. printing or publishing facilities shall not have any loading spaces located adjacent to any residential zone. All loading spaces shall be screened from any adjacent residential use, business use, and street. CC. private lodges and clubs : 1. shall be located on an arterial or collector street as identified in the comprehensive plan; 2 . if serving liquor shall not be located on a lot or parcel of land adjacent to any low density residential (R-1A) , urban residential (R-1B) , or Old Shakopee residential (R-1C) zone; and 3 . shall have all parking screened from any adjacent residential zone. DD. relocated structures : 1. shall have a moving permit from the City under City Code Sec. 4 . 08; 2 . prior to moving, shall have given cash, cashier' s check, or letter of credit as a financial guarantee to the City to ensure completion of all work. The financial guarantee shall be in an amount equal to the Building Official' s estimate of the cost to bring the structure into compliance with the Building Code; 3 . shall meet all requirements of the Building Code within six months after moving; and 4. if the structure is not in full compliance with the Building Code after six months after moving, the City, in its sole discretion, may drawn on the financial guarantee and take whatever steps it deems necessary to bring the relocated structure into compliance with the Building Code. In the event the City draws on the financial guarantee, 10% of the total guarantee shall be paid to the City as its administrative fee. EB. restaurants, class I or class II, contained within a principal structure and oriented toward serving employees or those working in the immediate area: 1. shall not exceed 15 percent of the gross floor area or 3, 000 square feet, whichever is less; and 2 . shall not increase traffic congestion on streets . FF. restaurants, class II : 1. if serving liquor, shall not be located on a lot or parcel of land adjacent to any low density residential (R-1A) , urban residential (R-1B) , or Old Shakopee residential (R-1C) zone; and 2 . if located within 100 feet of a residential use, shall limit its hours of operation to between 5 : 00 a.m. and 11 : 00 p.m. . GG. retail uses generally associated with a permitted use: 1. shall not require or result in any exterior building modifications, such as loading spaces, separate entrances, free-standing signs, or overnight parking of commercial vehicles; 2 . shall be contained within a principal structure and oriented toward serving employees or customers of the permitted use or uses in the immediate area; 3 . shall not exceed 25 percent of the gross floor area of the principal structure; 4 . shall have no outside storage or display or accessory structures; and 5. shall submit a sign plan. HH. retail uses and entertainment facilities : 1. shall be an integral part of a permitted principal use; 2 . shall have no entrance except from within the principal building; 3 . shall display no external signage except on the first floor of the building; 4. shall occupy no more than 25% of the ground floor area. II. self-storage facilities: 1. shall limit its hours of operation to between 7 : 00 a.m. and 10 . 00 p.m. ; 2 . shall submit a lighting plan; and 3 . shall have all storage buildings separated by sufficient space for two lanes of traffic. JJ. storage, assembly, or servicing incidental to a permitted use : 1. shall have no exterior storage; 2 . shall screen any loading spaces; 3. shall not have any driveways or parking of trucks located within any front, side, or rear yard setback adjacent to any residential zone; and 4. shall not exceed 25 percent of the gross floor area of the principal structure. M. structures over the specified height : 1. shall submit a map showing shading patterns created by the over height structure; and 2 . shall be set back from each property line a distance equal to half the structure height . LL. taverns shall not be located on a lot or parcel of land adjacent to any low density (R-1A) , urban residential (R- 13) , or Old Shakopee residential (R-1C) zone . Iii. theaters shall be permitted only when it can be demonstrated through a traffic plan that vehicular ingress and egress may be accomplished without inducing undue traffic problems on areas streets . NN. uses having a drive-up or drive-through window: 1. shall be screened to a height of 6 feet from any adjacent residential zone; 2 . shall not have a public address system which is audible from any residential property; and 3 . shall provide stacking for at least six vehicles per aisle. The required stacking shall not interfere with internal circulation patterns or with designated parking facilities, and shall not be located in any public right-of-way, private access easement, or within the required parking setback. 00. utility service structures . All utility service structures except water towers and electrical substations shall be subject to the following: 1. shall be less than 400 square feet in area; 2. shall be less than 15 feet in height; 3 . may be used only to provide weather protection for utility equipment; and 4. shall be designed, placed, and landscaped as necessary to assure that it blends in with the neighboring uses, and is unobtrusive. PP. vehicle sales, service, or repair: 1. shall not store any vehicles which are unlicensed and inoperative for more than seven days, except in appropriately designed and screened storage areas; 2 . shall conduct all repair, assembly, disassembly, or maintenance of vehicles within a building, except for minor maintenance such as tire inflation, adding oil, and wiper replacement; 3 . shall not have any outside storage or display except of vehicles for sale or rent; 4 . shall not have a public address system which is audible from any residential property; 5 . shall screen all storage areas; 6 . shall screen all display areas adjacent to a residential zone; 7 . shall apply the parking setback to all areas where vehicles are located; 8. shall maintain a landscaped buffer 100 feet wide from any residential zone; and 9 . all motor vehicle dealers shall be licensed by the State. QQ. wholesale and assembly operations : 1. shall not have any loading spaces located adjacent to any residential zone; and 2 . shall screen all loading spaces from any residential zone. SEC. 11 . 88 . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRY ZONES. Subd. 1 . Purpose. It is the intent of the City in establishing general and specific criteria for conditional uses that such uses be subject to careful evaluation to ensure that their location and design are consistent with the standards, purposes and procedures of this Chapter and the comprehensive plan, and do not have a detrimental impact on neighboring properties. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals may impose conditions on such uses in order to ensure compliance or to effect the purpose of this Chapter. Subd. 2 . Specific Standards for Industry Zones. In addition to the standards specified in Sec. 11 . 85 of this Chapter, no conditional use permit shall be granted in the industry zones unless the Board of Adjustment and Appeals determines that each of the following specific standards will be met : A. airports and heliports : 1. shall establish and utilize approach and departure routes over non-residential areas to the maximum extent possible; 2 . shall not be located on a lot or parcel of land within 500 feet of any residential zone; and 3 . shall have a dust free landing strip or pad. B. boathouses : 1. shall not be designed or used for human habitation; 2 . shall not contain sanitary facilities; 3 . shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from the ordinary high water level; 4. shall not occupy an area greater than 250 square feet; 5. shall be constructed or screened to reduce visibility from public waters and adjacent shorelands through the use of vegetation, topography, color, or increased setback, assuming summer leaf-on conditions; and 6. if located on shorelands adjacent to recreational development waterbodies, shall not occupy an area greater than 400 square feet . The width of the structure shall not exceed 20 feet as measured parallel to the shoreline. C. commercial vehicle rental facilities : 1. shall not wash any vehicle except within a building; 2 . shall not repair or maintain any vehicle on site, except in an enclosed structure; 3 . shall have all outside parking facilities at least 100 feet from any residential zone; and 4 . shall screen all outside parking facilities from any adjacent residential zone . D. concrete or asphalt plants shall not be located closer than 500 feet to any residential zone . E. day care facilities : 1. shall have drop-off and pick-up areas located outside of the public right-of-way, and designed to enhance vehicular and pedestrian safely; 2 . shall outdoor play areas located and designed to mitigate visual and noise impacts on adjoining residential uses; and 3 . shall submit a traffic plan which addresses industrial traffic flow with respect to the day care operation. F. developments containing more than one principal structure per lot : 1. shall be designed and placed to facilitate ingress, egress, and overall circulation, both for the development as a whole and for the individual buildings and structures within the development; and 2 . shall consist of structures that are owned, maintained, and operated under unified control in accordance with a plan which contain provisions providing for the enforcement thereof. G. flood fringe area storage of materials or equipment below the regulatory flood protection elevation, if, in time of flooding, the materials or equipment are buoyant, flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life, shall submit a plan for removal of the materials and equipment from the area within the time available after a flood warning. H. floodway area structures accessory to a permitted or conditional use: 1. shall not cause any increase in the stage of a 100- year or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected; 2 . shall not be designed for human habitation; 3 . shall be constructed and placed on the building site so as to offer the minimum obstruction to the flow of flood waters . Whenever possible, structures shall be constructed with the longitudinal axis parallel to the direction of flood flow. So far as practicable, structures shall be placed approximately on the same flood flow lines as those of adjoining structures; 4. shall be elevated on fill or structurally dry flood proofed in accordance with the FP-1 or FP-2 flood proofing classifications in the State Building Code. As an alternative, an accessory structure may be flood proofed to the FP-3 or FP-4 flood proofing classification in the State Building Code provided the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment, does not exceed 500 square feet in size, and for a detached garage, the detached garage must be used solely for parking of vehicles and limited storage. All flood proofed accessory structures must meet the following additional standards, as appropriate : a. The structure must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure and shall be designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls; and b. Any mechanical and utility equipment in the structure must be elevated to or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or properly flood proofed. I. floodway area placement of fill : 1. shall not cause any increase in the stage of a 100- year or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected; 2 . shall not include spoil from dredging, or sand and gravel mining operations, unless a long-term site development plan is submitted which includes an erosion and sedimentation prevention element; and 3 . shall be protected from erosion by vegetative cover, mulching, rip rap, or other acceptable method. J. floodway area storage yards fcr equipment, machinery, or materials : 1 . shall not cause any increase in the stage of a 100- year or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected; 2 . shall not include any material that, in time of flooding, is flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life; and 3 . shall be limited to materials or equipment which is readily removable from the area within the time available after a flood warning and in accordance with a plan approved by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals . J. floodway area uses including (1) mining and storage of sand, gravel, and other mined materials; (2) marinas, boat rentals, docks, piers, wharves, and water control structures; (3) railroads, streets, bridges, utility transmission lines, and pipelines; (4) campgrounds with facilities for recreational vehicles; and (5) other uses similar to those permitted, shall not cause any increase in the stage of a 100-year or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected. L. floodway area structural works for flood control such as levees, dikes, and floodwalls constructed to any height where the intent is to protect individual structures, and levees or dikes where the intent is to protect agricultural crops for a frequency flood event equal to or less than the 10-year frequency flood event : 1. shall be subject to the provisions of Minn. Stat . Chapter 105, if they will change the course, current, or cross-section of protected wetlands or public waters; 2 . shall be prohibited if they are community-wide structural works for flood control intended to remove areas from the regulatory flood plain; and 3 . shall not cause an increase to the 100-year or regional flood. The technical analysis must assume equal conveyance or storage loss on both sides of a stream. M. grain elevators: 1. shall have all loading spaces located at least 300 feet from any residential zone; and 2 . shall provide a safety plan satisfactory to the Fire Chief to be followed in the event of fire or explosion. N. industrial or technical training schools : 1. shall not have any overnight outside storage of vehicles undergoing maintenance; and 2 . shall have any structures constructed on site for training purposes dismantled or removed within a reasonable period of time following completion of the training. 0. junkyards : 1. shall be completely screened on all sides, with an opaque fence or wall 8 feet or more in height, constructed of new materials, maintained in good condition, and screened additionally with suitable planting; 2 . shall not be located closer than 1, 000 feet to existing state and federal roads, nor closer than 100 feet to any street; and 3 . shall not be located on a lot or parcel of land closer than 300 feet to any residential zone. P. landscaping services and contractors : 1. shall promptly remove any diseased or dead plant materials, and dispose of them in a sanitary manner; 2. shall store all equipment at least 100 feet from any residential zone; and 3 . shall screen all equipment from any adjacent residential zone. Q. manufacturing, fabrication, processing, and assembly conducted entirely with an enclosed building, except those involving a project that fits within one of the Mandatory EIS Categories under Minn. Rules 4410 .4400 : 1. shall meet all federal, state, and City health code requirements; 2 . shall meet all federal, state, and City environmental code requirements; 3 . shall not begin operation until any applicable environmental review, including an environmental assessment worksheet or an environmental impact statement is completed and all mitigation measures incorporated into the use. Any construction prior to the completion of the environmental review and incorporation of all mitigation measures is at the applicant' s risk; 4. shall provide the City with information regarding the nature and location of all explosive materials, and keep such information current; 5 . shall not require isolation from residential or business uses; 6 . shall be buffered, if necessary, to protect adjacent uses; and 7. shall not cause a public nuisance such as noise, odor, smoke, dust, dirt, vibration, or heat, or attract insects. R. manufacturing, fabrication, processing, assembly, and storage operations, and research laboratories, that fit within one of the Mandatory EIS Categories under Minn. Rules 4410 .4400 : 1. shall meet all federal, state, and City health code requirements; 2 . shall meet all federal, state, and City environmental code requirements; 3 . shall not begin operation until the environmental impact statement is completed and all mitigation measures incorporated into the use. Any construction prior to the completion of the environmental impact statement and incorporation of all mitigation measures is at the applicant' s risk; and 4. shall provide the City with information regarding the nature and location of all explosive materials, and keep such information current . S. mining: 1. shall provide the City with the exact legal description and acreage of area to be mined; 2 . shall provide the City with an aerial photograph of the site prior to any mining; 3. shall provide the City with the following maps of the entire site and all areas within 500 feet of the site, drawn at a scale of one (_) inch to one hundred (100) feet : a. Map A - Existing conditions to include : i. contour lines at two (2) foot intervals; ii. existing vegetation; iii. existing drainage and permanent water areas; iv. existing structures; v. existing wells; and vi. cross-sectional views from each direction; b. Map B - Proposed operations to include: i. structures to be erected; ii. location of sites to be mined showing the maximum depth of proposed excavation; iii. location of tailings deposits showing maximum height of deposits; iv. location of machinery to be used in the mining operation; v. location of storage of mined materials, showing height of storage deposits; vi. location of parking facilities; vii. location of storage of explosives; viii.erosion and sediment control structures; ix. location of proposed wells, and the depth to the water table; x. location of proposed washing operations; xi. a mining quantities table showing the quantity and type of materials expected to be mined in each phase and each year; and xii. cross-sectional views of the site during each phase from each direction; c. Map C - End use plan to include : i . final grade of proposed site showing elevations and contour lines at two (2) foot intervals; ii. location and species of vegetation to be replanted; iii. location and nature of any structures to be erected in relation to the end use plan; and iv. cross-sectional views of the site after final grading; 4. shall provide the City with a full and adequate description of all phases of the proposed operation to include an estimate of duration of the mining operation; 5. shall provide a dust control plan detailing the methods proposed for controlling dust, application rates and time frames, and volumes of water to be used; 6. shall pave or gravel all roads which are within 450 feet of any other zone to minimize dust conditions; 7. shall provide a noise control plan showing all occupied structures within 1000 feet of the mining site, existing noise contours in 5 dB intervals, and noise contours anticipated during operations for each phase; 8. shall provide a vibration control plan; 9. shall provide a landscape plan prepared by or under the supervision of a landscape architect showing material types, common and botanical names, sizes, number, and location of proposed plantings; 10. shall provide lighting and signage plans showing the type, height, and location of all exterior lighting and signs; 11. shall provide a stormwater management plan showing the stormwater contour lines and drainage patterns prior to, during, and after mining, stormwater runoff calculations, and indicating that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency' s Best Management Practices shall be followed; 12 . shall provide a traffic analysis prepared by a professional engineer showing the following: a. existing traffic volumes on affected streets; b. anticipated traffic volumes on affected streets; c. anticipated trip generation for each phase or operations change; d. morning and afternoon peak hour traffic volumes at all driveways into the site; e. recommended traffic improvements both on and off the site; and f. recommended traffic management actions, including truck routing; 13 . shall complete an environmental assessment worksheet; 14. if adjacent to a residential zone or within 300 feet of two (2) or more residential structures, shall be bound by the following standards : a. where water collects to a depth of one and one-half (1 1/2) feet or more, for at least one (1) month, and occupies an area of 700 square feet or more, all access to such water shall be barred by a fence or other barrier at least four (4) feet in height; and b. where slopes occur that are steeper than one (1) foot vertical to three (3) feet horizontal, for a period of one (1) month or more, all access to such slopes shall be barred by a fence or other barrier at least four (4) feet in height; 15. shall screen the mining site from adjacent residential or business uses. The mining site also shall be screened from any street within 500 feet . The screening shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in height, and planted with a fast growing species. Existing trees and ground cover along street frontage shall be preserved, maintained, and supplemented for the depth of the street yard setback, except where traffic safety requires cutting and trimming; 16. shall cut or trim weeds and any other unsightly or noxious vegetation as may be necessary to preserve a reasonably neat appearance and to prevent seeding on adjoining property; 17 . shall not interfere with surface water drainage beyond the boundaries of the mining operation. The mining operation shall not adversely affect the quality of surface or subsurface water resources . Surface water originating outside and passing through the mining site shall, at its point of departure from the mining site, be of equal quality to or better quality than the water at the point where it enters the mining site . The mining operator shall perform any water treatment necessary to comply with this provision; 18. shall conduct all operations between the hours of 7 : 00 a.m. and 7 : 00 p.m. Shorter hours may be established in the conditional use permit; 19 . for a gravel mine, shall have a maximum area without ground cover or being mined at one time not to exceed twenty (20) acres; and 20. immediately after operations have ceased, shall be restored in compliance with the following: a. within a period of three (3) months after the termination of a mining operation, or within three (3) months after abandonment of such operation for a period of six months, all mining structures shall be dismantled and removed by, and at the expense of, the mining operator last operating such structures; b. the peaks and depressions of the area shall be graded and backfilled to a surface which will result in gently rolling topography in substantial conformity to the land area immediately surrounding the mining site, and which will minimize erosion due to rainfall . No finished slope shall exceed eighteen percent (18%) in grade; and c. restored areas shall be sodded or surfaced with soil of a quality at least equal to the topsoil of land areas immediately surrounding the mining site, and to a depth of at least six (6) inches, or a greater depth if recommended by the Scott County Soil and Water Conservation District . Such required topsoil shall be planted with legumes and grasses. Trees and shrubs also may be planted, but not as a substitute for legumes and grasses . Such planting shall be done in conformity with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency' s Best Management Practices to adequately retard soil erosion. Excavations completed to a water producing depth need not be backfilled if the water depth is a: least ten (10) feet, and if banks shall be sloped to a water line at a slope no greater than three (3) feet horizontal to cne (1) foot vertical . The finished grade shall be such that it will not adversely affect the surrounding land or future development of the site upon which mining operations have been conducted. The finished plan shall restore the mining site to a condition whereby it can be utilized for the type of land use proposed to occupy the site after mining operations cease. T. recycling or composting facilities : 1. shall conduct all operations either within a building or at least 500 feet from any residential or business zone; 2 . shall not collect more material on site than can be processed within a 60-day period; and 3 . shall promptly remove from the site all material which has been processed. U. relocated structures : 1. shall have a moving permit from the City under City Code Sec. 4 . 08; 2 . prior to moving, shall have given cash, cashier' s check, or letter of credit as a financial guarantee to the City to ensure completion of all work. The financial guarantee shall be in an amount equal to the Building Official' s estimate of the cost to bring the structure into compliance with the Building Code; 3 . shall meet all requirements of the Building Code within six months after moving; and 4. if the structure is not in full compliance with the Building Code after six months after moving, the City, in its sole discretion, may drawn on the financial guarantee and take whatever steps it deems necessary to bring the relocated structure into compliance with the Building Code. In the event the City draws on the financial guarantee, 10% of the total guarantee shall be paid to the City as its administrative fee. V. residences fcr security personnel : 1. shall no: exceed one dwelling per principal use; 2 . shall be used only by a resident security guard and the guard' s family, and shall not be available for rent to the public; and 3 . may not exceed 1, 000 square feet of living space. W. restaurants, class I or class II, contained within a principal structure and oriented toward serving employees or those working in the immediate area: 1. shall not exceed 15 percent of the gross floor area or 3, 000 square feet, whichever is less; 2 . shall not increase traffic congestion on streets . X. retail sales of products manufactured, fabricated, assembled, or stored on site: 1. shall sell products only within the principal structure; 2 . shall limit the area devoted to display and sale of the products to no more than 15 percent of the principal structure or 2000 square feet within the principal structure, whichever is less; 3 . shall not require or result in exterior building modifications; 4. shall have no outside storage or display or accessory structures; and 5. shall submit a sign plan. Y. self-storage facilities : 1. shall not allow maintenance of any vehicles on site, except within a building; 2. shall have a security system adequate to limit access to persons renting a storage site; and 3 . shall screen all storage. Z. structures over the specified height : 1. shall submit a map showing shading patterns created by the over height structure; and 2 . shall be set back from each property line a distance equal to half the structure height . AA. vehicle repair: 1. shall not store any vehicles which are unlicensed or inoperative for more than seven days; 2 . shall screen all storage areas; and 3 . shall not be located on a lot or parcel of land within 200 feet of any residential zone. SEC. 11. 89 . VARIANCES. Subd. 1. Variance Jurisdiction. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall have jurisdiction over any variance which is not closely related to a land use application requiring consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council . Any variance which is closely related to such a land use application shall be under the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission and City Council . Subd. 2 . Criteria for Granting Variances. A variance from the literal provisions of this Chapter may be granted where the following circumstances are found to exist : A. The strict enforcement of the ordinance provisions would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Undue hardship means the following: 1. the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls; 2 . the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property; 3 . the circumstances were not created by the landowner; 4. the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and 5 . the problems extend beyond economic considerations. Economic considerations do not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. B. It has been demonstrated that a variance as requested will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this Chapter. C. The request is not for a use variance. D. Conditions to be imposed by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals will insure compliance and to protect the adjacent properties . E. Variances in the floodplain overlay zone also shall meet the following criteria: 1. No variance shall have the effect of allowing a lower degree of flood protection than the regulatory flood protection elevation for the particular area. 2 . The board shall submit to the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources a copy of the application for proposed variance sufficiently in advance so that the Commissioner will receive at least ten days notice of the hearing. 3 . A copy of all decisions granting variances shall be forwarded to the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources within ten (10) days of such action. 4. Flood Insurance Notice and Record Keeping. The zoning administrator shall notify the applicant for a variance that the issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the base flood level will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance and that such construction below the 100- year or regional flood level increases risks to life and property. Such notification shall be maintained with a record of all variance actions . The City shall maintain a record of all variance actions, including justification for their issuance, and report such variances issued in its annual or biennial report submitted to the administrator of the national flood insurance program. Subd. 3 . Application. An application for a variance shall be filed with the Zoning Administrator on the appropriate forms stating the undue hardship claimed. The application must be accompanied by the following: A. A site plan at a scale large enough for clarity showing the following information: 1. location and dimensions of lots, buildings, driveways, and off-street parking spaces; 2. distances between buildings and front, side, and rear lot lines; principal buildings and accessory structures; principal buildings and accessory structures on adjacent lots; 3 . location of signs, easements, underground utilities, septic tanks, tile fields, and water wells; and 4. any additional information as reasonably may be required by the Zoning Administrator. B. a list of the names and addresses of the owners of all properties located wholly or partially within 350 feet of the property, as such appear on the records of the Scott County Recorder; C. evidence of ownership or an interest in the property; D. the fee; and E. such other information as may be required by the City. Subd. 4 . Public Hearing. A. Generally. Upon receipt of a completed application, a date shall be set for a public hearing before the Board of Adjustment and Appeals . Property owners within 350 feet of the property for which a variance is requested shall be notified by mail of the proposed variance at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing. Published notice of hearing also shall be given at least 10 days before the hearing in the official newspaper. B. Shoreland Overlay Zone. The Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources shall be given written notice all hearings to consider a variance in the shoreland overlay zone at least ten days before the day of the hearing. Subd. 5. Decision. A. Generally. Following the public hearing, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall decide the matter before it . Variances may be approved by the affirmative vote of a simple majority of those present . If the Board denies a variance, it shall make a finding and determination that the conditions required for approval do not exist . No application for a variance which has been denied wholly or in part shall be resubmitted for a period of six (6) months from the date of denial, except on grounds of new evidence or proof of change of conditions . All decisions by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals are final subject to appeal to the City Council . B. Shoreland Overlay Zone. A copy of any approved variance affecting land within the shoreland overlay zone shall be sent to the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources within 10 days after approval . When a variance has been approved despite the Commissioner' s recommendation of denial, the copy of the final action shall be accompanied by a summary of the public record and testimony regarding the matter and the findings of fact and conclusions which support the issuance of the variance. Subd. 6. Appeal. Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals regarding a variance may have such decision reviewed by the City Council if a request for review is submitted to the Zoning Administrator within 10 days of the date of the decision. The appeal shall be in writing and shall include a statement of the alleged errors or omissions of the Board. Subd. 7 . Additional Conditions . In granting a variance, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals or City Council may impose conditions in order to preserve the health, safety or welfare of the community or in order to implement the purposes of this Chapter or the comprehensive plan. Subd. 8 . Recording. A copy of the variance shall be filed by the City with the Scot: County Recorder if the variance applies to abstract property. The variance shall contain a legal description of the property affected. Subd. 9 . Term of Variance. Any variance granted by the City shall run with the land unless within one year of the date of approval no building permit has been issued or substantial work performed on the project, in which case the variance shall be null and void. The Board may extend the period for construction upon finding that the interest of the owners of neighboring properties will not be adversely affected by such extension. Subd. 10. Specific Project. A variance shall be valid only for the project for which it was granted. Construction of any project shall be in substantial compliance with the building plans and specifications reviewed and approved by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals or the City Council . Subd. 11 . Construction During Appeal Period. Any applicant who obtains a building permit and starts construction upon the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals prior to the termination of the appeal period, assumes the risk that the decision may be reversed upon appeal . When an appeal is received by the City, the applicant will be notified of the appeal and informed of the date of the City Council meeting at which it will be heard. Subd. 12 . Violations. No person shall violate, fail to comply with, or assist, direct, or permit the violation of the terms or conditions of a variance. Such violation shall be a violation of the variance and shall render the variance null and void. SEC. 11. 90 . APPEALS. Subd. 1 . Appeals from City Staff Decisions . Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Zoning Administrator or other person regarding the enforcement of this Chapter, may appeal to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals . The appeal shall specify what error allegedly was made in an order, requirement, decision, or determination made by the Zoning Administrator or other person. The appeal shall be filed in writing with the Zoning Administrator within seven days of the date of decision. Upon receipt of an appeal, the Zoning Administrator shall schedule the matter for consideration by the Board. The Board shall have authority to affirm, modify, or reverse the decision of the Zoning Administrator or other person. This provision shall not apply in the case of a criminal prosecution for violation of this Chapter. Subd. 2 . Appeals from Decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals may appeal the decision to the City Council . The appeal must be submitted in writing to the Zoning Administrator within 10 days of the date of the decision, and shall include a statement of the alleged errors or omissions of the Board. Upon appeal, the City Council shall consider the request within 90 days unless an extended period is agreed upon by the parties. Subd. 3 . Construction During Appeal Period. Any applicant who obtains a building permit and starts construction after the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, but prior to the termination of the appeal period, assumes the risk that the decision may be reversed upon appeal . When an appeal is received by the City, the applicant will be notified of the appeal and informed of the date of the City Council meeting at which it will be heard. SEC. 11 .91 . NONCONFORMITIES. Subd. 1. Purpose. It is recognized that there are structures and uses of land which were lawful when established but which do not now comply with all applicable provisions of this Chapter. While nonconformities may not be summarily terminated, it is the purpose and intent of this Chapter to discourage the survival of Type A nonconformities and such uses are hereby declared to be incompatible with this Chapter and with the comprehensive plan. It is further the purpose and intent of this Chapter to discourage the enlargement, expansion or extension of any Type A nonconformity or any increase of the impact of such nonconformity on adjoining property. It is also recognized that there are Type B nonconformities in which the uses continue to be permissible but which are operated on sites or in structures which do not fully meet the development standards of this Chapter. It is the intent of this Chapter to distinguish between uses which are not permitted and those in which development standards or other incidents of development are not in full compliance with this Chapter. Type A nonconformities will be discouraged and not allowed to expand while Type B nonconformities will be allowed to continue in existence and expand under carefully regulated conditions . Subd. 2 . Types of Nonconformities. This Chapter recognizes the following two types of nonconformities: A. Type A nonconformities shall include land and structures which are devoted to a use not permitted by this Chapter. B. Type B nonconformities shall include developed land which is devoted to a use permitted by this Chapter, but where the site or structure is not in compliance with some other provision of this Chapter, such as the design standards applicable within that zone. Subd. 3 . Regulation of Type A Nonconformities. Type A nonconformities shall be regulated in accordance with the following: A. No such use shall be expanded, enlarged to use more land area, intensified, replaced, structurally changed, or relocated, except to make it a permitted use. Normal maintenance and non-structural repairs shall be excepted from this prohibition; B. No nonconformity shall be resumed if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for a period of 6 or more months. Time shall be calculated as beginning on the date following the last day in which the use was in normal operation and shall run continuously thereafter; C. Full utilization of the nonconformity shall not be resumed if the amount of land or floor area dedicated to the use is lessened or if the intensity of the use is in any manner diminished for a period of 6 or more months. Time shall be calculated as beginning on the day following the last day in which the nonconformity was in full operation and shall run continuously thereafter. Following the expiration of 6 months, the nonconformity may be used only in the manner or to the extent used during the preceding 6 months. For the purposes of this subdivision, intensity of use shall include, but not be limited to, hours of operation, traffic, noise, exterior storage, signs, exterior lighting, types of goods or services offered, odors and number of employees; D. Removal or destruction of a nonconformity to the extent of more than 50 percent of its estimated market value, excluding land, as determined by the assessor, shall terminate the right to continue the nonconformity; B. Notwithstanding the prohibitions contained in the foregoing paragraphs of this subdivision, if approved by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals a nonconformity may be changed to another nonconformity of less intensity. In all instances the applicant has the burden of proof regarding the relative intensities of uses; F. If a nonconformity is superseded or replaced by a permitted use, the nonconforming status of the premises and any rights which arise under the provisions of this section shall terminate. Subd. 4. Regulation of Type B Nonconformities. Type B nonconformities shall be regulated in accordance with the following: A. Expansion of an existing use or structure, reconstruction of a partially destroyed structure, construction of a new structure, or other intensification of a Type B nonconformity may be permitted upon a finding by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals of the following: 1. the number and extent of nonconformities will be reduced in conjunction with the proposed construction or intensification; 2 . the impact of nonconformities upon adjacent property will be reduced in conjunction with the proposed construction or intensification; and 3. the conditions to be imposed by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals will effect the intent of this section. B. A Type B nonconformity which is destroyed to the extent of more than 50 percent of its market value at the time of loss shall be replaced only in compliance with the standards of the applicable zone . A Type B nonconformity destroyed to the extent of less than 50 percent of market value at the time of loss may be rebuilt to previously existing dimensions . In reviewing a permit for any Type B nonconformity which has been partially destroyed, the City shall seek to make the development conform as closely to the requirements of this Chapter as is reasonably practical . Subd. 5. Nonconformity; Eminent Domain. When the taking under eminent domain of a portion of the land upon which there existed a lawful use prior to such taking results in such use becoming unlawful under this Chapter, such use is a nonconformity and may be continued only under the provisions of this Chapter. SECTIONS 11.92 - 11.98. Reserved. SEC. 11. 99 . VIOLATION A MISDEMEANOR. Every person violates a section, subdivision, paragraph, or provision of this Chapter, when the person performs an act thereby prohibited or declared unlawful, or fails to act when such failure is thereby prohibited or declared unlawful, or who knowingly makes or submits any false statement or document in connection with any application or procedure required by this Chapter. Upon conviction thereof, such person shall be punished as for a misdemeanor. Section 2 - General Provisions . City Code Chapter 1, General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty For Violation, is hereby adopted in its entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3 - Summary Approved. The City Council hereby determines that the text of the summary of this ordinance, marked "Official Summary of Ordinance No. " and a copy of which is attached hereto, clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. The Council further determines that publication of the title and such summary will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. Section 4 - Posting and Filing. A copy of this ordinance is filed in the office of the City Clerk and a copy is provided to the Scott County Library for posting and filing, at which locations a copy is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours. Section 5 - The City Clerk shall publish the title of this ordinance and the official summary in the official newspaper with notice that a printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and the Scott County Library. Section 6 - Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective upon the latest of the following actions : its passage, the publication of its title and summary, and the passage and publication of an ordinance or ordinance summary adopting a new zoning map. In no event shall the effective date for the property described in Exhibit A be earlier than December 7, 1994 . Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest : City Clerk Approved as to form: -y: / - City Attorney Published in the Shakopee Valle News on the day of , 1994 . EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 VALLEYFAIR I Parcel I: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 33, Township 116, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, lying East of a line drawn parallel with and distant 3, 100 feet East of the West line extended of Section 4, Township 115, Range 22. Parcel II: That part of the East half of Section 4, Township 115, Range 22, lying Northerly of the centerline of Minnesota Trunk Highway No. 101 EXCEPTING THEREFROM that part of said East half lying Northerly of the Northeasterly boundary of Trunk Highway 101 and Westerly of a line drawn parallel with and 3,100 feet East of the West line extended of said Section 4, Scott County, Minnesota. Parcel III: That part of Government Lot 2, Section 3, Township 115 North, Range 22 West, Scott County, Minnesota, lying Northerly of the centerline of State Trunk Highway No. 101. Parcel IV: Lot 3, Section 3, Township 115 North, Range 22 West, Scott County, Minnesota. Parcel V: That part of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter (N} of SWI) of Section 3, Township 115 North, Range 22 West, Scott County, Minnesota, which • lies Northerly of the centerline of State Trunk Highway No. 101. EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 . . U GAL DIFSCIEMMIONS CANTERBURY DOWNS PARCEL I: The Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 5, Township 115, Range 22. Scott County. Minnesota, excepting therefroee The West 150. 0 feet of the North 333. 0 feet of sold Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 5. Township 115. Range 22. PARCEL II: The South half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 5, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota. PARCEL III: • The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 4, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota. PARCEL IV: The Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, excepting therefrom that part 171ng South, Southwesterly and Southeasterly of the' following described line ("Line A ): Line k Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of Section 9; thence on on assumed bearing of North 1 degree 10 minutes 22 seconds West along the East line of sold Northwest Quarter a distance of 730. 00 feet to the *point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 88 degrees 49 minutes 38 seconds West a distance of 2572. 89 feet; thence along a tangential curve concave to the North, having a rodius of 1, 321. 00 feet, o central angle of 64 degrees 32 minutes 00 seconds, on arc length of 1,487.87 feet; thence South 83 degrees 21 minutes 38 seconds West (not tangent to sold curve) a distance of 200 feet more or less to the West line of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 8 and there terminating. PARCEL V: That part of the East half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, except that part of sold East half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, lying South, Southwesterly and Southeasterly of the following described line ("Line A"): Line A: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of Section 9; thence on an assumed bearing of North 1 degree 10 minutes 22 seconds West along the East line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance of 730. 00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 88 degrees 49 minutes 38 seconds West, a dlstonce of 2572. 89 feet; thence along o tangential curve concave to the North, having a radius of 1, 321. 00 feet, o central angle of 64 degrees 32 minutes 00 seconds, on ore length of 1, 487. 87 feet; thence South 63 degrees 21 minutes 38 seconds West (not tangent to said curve) a distonce of 200 feet more or less to the West line of sold East half of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 8 and there terminating. Together with a nonexclusive easement for roadway purposes as set forth in Document No. 218198 in the office of the County Recorder, and os Document No. 33757 In the office of the Registrar of Titles as amended by Agreement filed os Document No. 276757 In the office of the County Recorder and os Document No. 51303 in the office of the Registrar of Titles over the following parcel: That port of the East half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 115. Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota described as follows, now being a port of Outlot B Canterbury Pork 2nd Addition: A strip of land 40. 00 feet In width the center line of which is described as follow,: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, • Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of North 1 degree 10 minutes 22 seconds West along the Eost line of sold Northwest Quarter a distance of 730. 00 feet; thence South 88 degrees 49 minutes 38 seconds West a distance of 2572. 89 feet; thence along a tangential curve concave to the North, having a radius of 1, 321. 00 feet; o central angle of 4 degrees 37 minutes 05 seconds, on arc length of 106. 47 feet to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described ; thence South 1 degree 10 minutes 22 seconds East (not tangent to sold curve) a distonce of 195. 46 feet; thence along a tangential curve concave to the West, having a radius of 300. 00 feet, o central angle of 30 degrees 21 minutes 29 seconds, an arc length of 158. 95 feet; thence South 29 degrees 11 minutes 07 seconds West tangent to sold lost described curve a distance of 399. 26 feet more or less to the centerline of County Rood No. 16 and there terminating. The sidelines of sold easement shall be lengthened or shortened to termincte at "Line A 1 EXH::T A, PAGE 3 • Together with on nonexclusive easement for roadway purposes as set forth In Document No. 218198 in the office of the County Recorder and as Document No. 33757 In the office of the Registrar of Titles over the following parcel: That port of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 115. Ronge 22, Scott County. Minnesota described cs follows. now being a port of Lot 2, Block 1. Canterbury Pork 2nd Addition: A strip of land 1. 00 foot In width the North line of which Is described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of sold Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 115, Range 22. Scott County , Minnesota; thence on on assumed bearing of North 1 degree 10 minutes 22 seconds West along the East line of sold Northwest Quarter o distance of 730. 00 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 86 degrees 49 minutes 38 seconds West a distonce of 350. 75 feet and there terminating. Together with anonexclusive easement for cable purposes as set forth In Document No. 278757 in the office of the County Recorder, and as Document No. 51303 in the office of the Registrar of Titles over the following parcel: The Westerly and Northwesterly Twenty (20) feet of Outlot A. as measured at right angles to the westerly and northwesterly lines of sold Outlot A. Canterbury Pork 2nd Addition, Scott County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plot thereof. Together with on nonexclusive easement for drainage purposes as set forth In Document No. 218198 in the office of the County Recorder and os Document No. 33757 In the office of the Registrar of Titles over the following parcel: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 115, Ronge 22. Scott County. Minnesota excepting therefrom the South 400 feet of the West 100 feet of the South half of the Northwest Quarter, lying South of Line A. Said easement lies Westerly and Southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the point of beginning of the above described Line A; thence South 88 degrees 49 minutes 38 seconds West, along said Line A, a distance of 2572. 89 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 1 degree 10 minutes 22 seconds East. a distance of 95. 00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 49 minutes 38 seconds East, a distance of 140. 0 feet; thence South 40 • degrees 40 minutes 22 seconds East, o distance of 550. 00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 49 minutes 38 seconds East, a distance of 460. 00 feet; thence South 1 degree 10 minutes 22 seconds East, a distance of 80. 00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 49 minutes 38 seconds Eost, o distance of 415. 00 feet; thence South 1 degree 10 minutes 22 seconds East, a distance of 110 feet more or less to the South line of the Northwest Quarter of scid Section 9 and there terminating. PARCELS I - IV: Torrens Property - Certificate No. 20295 PARCEL V: Abstract Property Total Areo - 324. 79 Acrest 'We hereby certify to Jacobs Realty, Inc., and Chicago Title Insurance Company, and to their successors and assigns, that we hove surveyed, on the ground, the property legally described hereon; that this plot of survey is o true, correct and accurate drawing and representation of sold property and the boundaries thereof; that the ' locations and dimensions of oil moor buildings, and parking areas ore correctly and accurately shown; that the location of the perimeter of the area In which the barns ore located Is accurately shown; the; based upon the Commitment for Title insurance Issued by Chicago Title Insurance Company heving on effective date of October 25, 1993 and bearing file number 8 1-9091, all recorded and visible easements and encroachments are correctly and accurately shown and identified by document number; that all streets, roads, means of public access, and rights-of-way which affect• benefit or burden sold property ore correctly end accurately shown; that the'e ore no discrepancies, conflicts. cops, overlap,, boundary disputes, shortages in area. encroachments of Improvements over boundary lines from or onto sold property or upon eosements, overlapping of Improvements, visible easements. overlapping of easements, roods, alleys, riots-of-wcy or building setOock lines which affect said Property. except as shown hereon; thet there c-e no fences, light posts or other improvements appurtenant to said property which o-e located within the-boundary lines of adjoining properties, except os shown hereon; tnol the legal description of said property, os set out hereon, 13 correct, complete cad accurate; that ony portion of sold property which is located in a flood plain or in any ctner flood hatord or flood danger area. as deslpnoted by applicable covernmectcl outherities. Is shown and Identified os such hereon. • c, in Hedlund, MN. RLS ho. 5342 OR:I NANCE NO. , FOURTH SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE CITY CODE BY ADOPTING A NEW ZONING ORDINANCE. The following is the official summary of Ordinance No. Fourth Series, approved by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, on , 1994 : THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS : Section 1 - That the City Code is hereby amended by repealing Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation (Zoning) ; Sec . 2 . 90, Official Maps - Effect and Procedures, of Chapter 2, Administration and General Government; and Sec. 4 . 30, Signs - Construction, Maintenance and Permits, of Chapter 4, Construction Licensing, Permits and Regulations; and adopting one new chapter which covers zoning, official maps, and signs. SEC. 11.01. TITLE, PURPOSE AND INTERPRETATION. This Chapter is enacted to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the City of Shakopee. From and after the effective date of this Chapter, the use of all land and all structures erected, altered, enlarged, or relocated, shall be in conformance with the provisions of this Chapter. Any existing use, structure, lot, or development which was legally established but is not in conformance with the provisions of this Chapter shall be regarded as non-conforming and may continue in existence only for such period of time and under such conditions as is provided for in Sec. 11 . 91 of this Chapter. The provisions of this Chapter are minimum requirements for the promotion of the public health, safety, general welfare, and sound planning. Where any provision of this Chapter is either more restrictive or less restrictive than a comparable provision imposed by any other regulation, the more restrictive provision, or the provision which imposes a higher standard or requirement, shall prevail . No land shall be '.:sed, and no structure shall be erected, converted, enlarged, reconstructed, altered, removed, cr used, for any purpose or in any manner which is not in conformity with the provisions of this Chapter. SEC. 11. 02 . DEFINITIONS . Specific definitions are created for many of the words and phrases used in the zoning chapter. SEC. 11. 03 . ZONING MAP. (Although the text of the ordinance refers to an adopted zoning map, the map will actually be adopted later this year. ) The boundaries of the zones are established as shown on the zoning map. All property within the City shall have the zoning designation shown on the zoning map. SEC. 11.20. ZONES. The City is hereby divided into the following zones : Agricultural Preservation (AG) Rural Residential (RR) Low Density Residential (R-1A) Urban Residential (R-1B) Old Shakopee Residential (R-1C) Medium Density Residential (R-2) Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) Highway Business (B-i) Office Business (B-2) Central Business (B-3) Major Recreation (MR) Light Industry (I-i) Heavy Industry (I-2) Planned Unit Development Overlay (PUD) Mining Overlay (MIN) Shoreland Overlay (SH) Floodplain Overlay (FP) Old Shakopee Business Overlay (B-1C) Reference to residential zones includes AG, RR, R-1A, R-1B, R-1C, R-2, and R-3 ; reference to business zones includes B-i, B-2, B-3 , and MR; and reference to industry zones includes I-1 and I-2 . SEC. 11.22 . AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ZONE (AG) . This zone is to preserve and promote agriculture in the unsewered areas of the City which are suitable for such use, to prevent scattered and leap-frog non-farm growth, and to prevent premature expenditures for such public services as roads, sewer, water, and police and fire protection. Uses allowed within this zone include agricultural uses, single family detached dwellings, and related uses. Certain uses, such as commercial feedlots and home occupations, are restricted as conditional uses, and must meet additional requirements . Within the agricultural preservation zone, development is limited to one dwelling per 40 acres. Minimum lot and yard sizes and a maximum building height are set . SEC. 11.24. RURAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE (RR) . This zone is to allow low-density residential development in areas which are not served by municipal urban services. Uses allowed within this zone include single family detached dwellings, some agricultural uses, and related uses. Certain uses, such as commercial recreation, are restricted as conditional uses, and must meet additional requirements. Within the rural residential zone, development is limited to one dwelling per 10 acres. Minimum lot and yard sizes and a maximum building height are set . SEC. 11.26. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R-1A) . This zone is to allow large-lot single family development in areas of the City served by sanitary sewer and water. Uses allowed within this zone are generally limited to single family detached dwellings and related uses . Certain uses, such as home occupations, are restricted as conditional uses, and must meet additional requirements . Within the low density residential zone, development is limited to one dwelling per 15, 000 square feet . Minimum lot and yard sizes and a maximum building height are set . SEC. 11 .28 . URBAN RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R-1B) . This zone is to provide an area for residential development where public sanitary sewer and water are available. Uses allowed within this zone include single family detached dwellings, existing duplexes and twinhomes, and related uses . Certain uses, such as bed and breakfast inns, are restricted as conditional uses, and must meet additional requirements . Within the urban residential zone, development is limited to one dwelling per 9, 000 square feet . Minimum lot and yard sizes and a maximum building height are set . SEC. 11.30 . OLD SHAROPEE RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R-1C) . This zone is to provide an area for the continuation of existing residential development and development of existing lots in the older residential areas where public sanitary sewer and water are available. The combination of small lots is encouraged. Uses allowed within this zone include single family detached dwellings, duplexes and twinhomes, and related uses. Certain uses, such as home occupations and hospitals, are restricted as conditional uses, and must meet additional requirements. Within the Old Shakopee residential zone, development is limited to one single-family dwelling per 6, 000 square feet, and one two- family dwelling per 11, 000 square feet. Small minimum lot and yard sizes and a maximum building height are set. SEC. 11.32 . MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R-2) . This zone is to provide an area which will allow 2 .5 to 8 residential dwellings per acre and also provide a transitional zone between single family residential areas and other land uses. Uses allowed within this zone include two-, three- and four-family dwellings, existing single family dwellings, and related uses. Certain uses, such as apartment buildings containing up to 6 units and hospitals, are restricted as conditional uses, and must meet additional requirements. Within the medium density residential zone, development is limited to one single-family dwelling per 9, 000 square feet, one two-family dwelling per 11, 000 square feet, one three-family dwelling per 12, 000 square feet, and one four-family dwelling per 16, 000 square feet. Minimum lot and yard sizes and a maximum building height are set. • SEC. 11.34 . MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R-3) . This zone is to provide an area which will allow 6 to 18 multiple-family dwelling units per acre, and also provide a transitional zone between single family residential areas and other land uses . Uses allowed within this zone include apartment buildings containing three or more units, existing single family and two- family dwellings, and related uses . Certain uses, such as nursing homes and hospitals, are restricted as conditional uses, and must meet additional requirements. Within the multiple-family residential zone, development is limited to one single-family dwelling per 9, 000 square feet, one two-family dwelling per 11, 000 square feet, one three-family dwelling per 12 , 000 square feet, and one four-family dwelling per 16, 000 square feet . Minimum lot and yard sizes and a maximum building height are set . SEC. 11.36 . HIGHWAY BUSINESS ZONE (B-1) . This zone is to provide an area for business uses fronting on or with immediate access to arterial and collector streets. Uses allowed within this zone include retail stores, motels, offices, and related uses . Certain uses, such as taverns and gas stations, are restricted as conditional uses, and must meet additional requirements . Within the highway business zone, a minimum lot area for new lots is one acre; for existing lots, 8, 000 square feet . The maximum floor area ratio is . 50 . Minimum lot and yard sizes and a maximum building height are set. SEC. 11.38 . OFFICE BUSINESS ZONE (B-2) . This zone is to provide an area for offices and related service uses, in an area where general retail is excluded. The zone is intended for areas identified in the comprehensive plan for office use or for transitional areas between residential and more intense uses. Uses allowed within this zone include offices, banks, and related uses. Certain uses, such as retail uses and restaurants, are restricted as conditional uses, and must meet additional requirements. Within the office business zone, a minimum lot area is 1 acre. The maximum floor area ratio is .50 . Minimum lot and yard sizes and a maximum building height are set. SEC. 11.40 . CENTRAL BUSINESS ZONE (B-3) . This zone is to provide a zone which accommodates the unique character of the central business area in terms of land uses and development patterns . Uses allowed within this zone include retail stores, offices, banks, and related uses. Certain uses, such as bus terminals and multiple-family dwellings, are restricted as conditional uses, and must meet additional requirements. Within the central business zone, the minimum lot area is 3, 000 square feet . The maximum floor area ratio is 4 . 0 . Minimum lot and yard sizes and a maximum building height are set . SEC. 11.42 . MAJOR RECREATION ZONE (MR) . This zone is to create a high quality environment for large amusement and recreation attractions with a regional draw, with a high degree of land use compatibility and street efficiency. It is further the intent of the zone to protect existing landscape features, to preserve open space, to sensitively integrate development with the natural landscape, and to require the planning of entire land ownerships as a unit rather than permit piecemeal or scattered small developments . Uses allowed within this zone are severely limited, with most uses being conditional uses . Conditional uses include all commercial recreation, motels, and related uses, and must meet additional requirements . Within the major recreation zone, the minimum lot area is 10 acres . Minimum lot and yard sizes are set . SEC. 11.44 . LIGHT INDUSTRY ZONE (I-1) . This zone is to provide an area for industrial, light manufacturing, and office uses which are generally not obtrusive and which serve as a transition between more intensive industrial sites and residential and business land uses . Uses allowed within this zone include warehousing, wholesaling and related uses. Certain uses, such as manufacturing and mini-storage, are restricted as conditional uses, and must meet additional requirements. Within the light industry zone, a minimum lot area with City sewer and water is 1 acre; without City services, 20 acres. Minimum lot and yard sizes and a maximum building height are set . SEC. 11.46. HEAVY INDUSTRY ZONE (I-2) . This zone is to provide an area for industrial uses in locations remote from residential uses and in which urban services and adequate transportation exist . Uses allowed within this zone include manufacturing, warehousing, and related uses. Certain uses, such as those involving hazardous materials, retail sales, and asphalt plants, are restricted as conditional uses, and must meet additional requirements. Within the heavy industry zone, the minimum lot area is 1 acre. Minimum lot and yard sizes and a maximum building height are set . (In addition to the zones listed above, a series of overlay zones are created. These zones are added to or overlaid upon another zone, and their requirements are imposed in addition to the requirements of the underlying zone. ) SEC. 11.50 . PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE (PUD) . This overlay zone is to encourage innovation, variety and creativity in site planning and architectural design; to maximize development compatibility; to encourage the planning of large parcels of land as a unit; to provide for greater efficiency in the use of land, streets, and energy; to protect important natural and cultural landscape features; to preserve open space; and to provide quality living, working, shopping, and recreating environments for residents and visitors. The planned unit development overlay zone may be added to any zone . Although generally optional, the zoning map may designate certain areas where the use of the planned unit development is required. Uses permitted in a planned unit development may be expanded beyond the permitted, conditional, and accessory uses allowed in the underlying zone, by the development plan. The City may place more restrictive conditions on the mixture of uses within a planned unit development to ensure preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare, compliance with the intent of this Chapter, and that land uses occurring within the planned unit development, and between the planned unit development and the surrounding land uses, do not conflict . Residential densities may be increased by up to 25 percent above the densities allowed in the underlying zone, if the site is within the metropolitan urban service area. A planned unit development which includes dwellings shall provide at least twenty (20) percent of the project area as open space. The City may grant credits up to 75%- against the open space requirement for improvements in the open space for park or recreation purposes, when such space is to be privately owned and maintained; or proof that the applicant is providing amenities desired by the City and of equal social value to open space, such as low-income housing, preservation of natural, cultural, or historic features, or other clear benefit to the public health, safety, or welfare. SEC. 11.52 . MINING OVERLAY ZONE (MIN) . This overlay zone is to provide an area for mining the City' s sand and gravel deposits while recognizing and providing for the long-term use of the land. The mining overlay zone allows for the use of naturally occurring resources but requires that care be taken to leave the land ready for immediate or eventual reuse consistent with the City' s comprehensive plan. This section applies only within the heavy industry (I-2) zone, and to land in other zones which is within an existing mine or adjacent to and surrounded on at least 3 sides by an existing mine. Mining is allowed only with a conditional use permit . Minimum lot area is 20 acres. Minimum setbacks from other zones, structures, and streets are set . SEC. 11.54. SHORELAND OVERLAY ZONE (SH) . This overlay zone is to control the density and location of developments in the shorelands of the public waters of the City in order to preserve water quality, enhance the natural characteristics of the shorelands and provide for the wise use of public waters and related land resources in the City. The regulations of the shoreland overlay zone shall apply to all lands within 300 feet of Eagle Creek, and to all lands within 1000 feet of the ordinary high water level of the following public waters or as mapped, whichever is less restrictive : 1) Dean Lake, which is classified as a Natural Environment lake, O' Dowd Lake, which is classified as a Recreational Development lake, and Unnamed (#70-80) , which is classified as a Natural Environment lake . Boathouses are allowed with a conditional use permit . Various minimum lot areas, lot widths, and setbacks are set, based on the type of water body and whether the structure has sewer service . Additional requirements regarding elevation of structures, alteration of vegetation or topography along the shoreland, and stormwater management are provided. SEC. 11.56 . FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY ZONE (FP) . The flood hazard areas of Shakopee are subject to periodic inundation which results in potential loss of life, loss of property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures or flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base, all of which adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. This overlay zone is based upon a reasonable method of analyzing flood hazards which is consistent with the standards established by the Minnesota department of natural resources . It is the purpose of this zone to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, and to minimize those losses described above. This section applies to all lands within the City shown as being within the floodway or flood fringe areas, which together shall be known as the floodplain overlay zone. Uses in the floodway area are limited to those generally without buildings; uses in the flood fringe area are broader. Within the floodway area, filling the land, constructing streets or buildings, and similar uses are allowed with a conditional use permit . In the flood fringe area, storage of flammable or buoyant materials requires a conditional use permit . Standards are set for uses in the floodway, uses in the flood fringe, public utilities, transportation facilities, and relocated residential structures. SEC. 11.58. OLD SHAKOPEE BUSINESS OVERLAY ZONE (B-1C) . The purpose of this overlay zone is to provide an area for the continuation of existing commercial development and development of existing lots in the older business areas for uses fronting on or with immediate access to arterial and collector streets. The combination of small lots is encouraged. This overlay zone may be applied to property zoned highway business and developed, surrounded by development, or platted for development as of the effective date of this ordinance. The lot width and setbacks are reduced from the requirement of the highway business zone. SEC. 11 . 60 . PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. The guiding of land development into a compatible relationship of uses depends upon the maintenance of certain standards . The purpose of this section is to establish limitations on certain activities with a high potential for pollution or nuisance . The performance standards shall apply in all zcnes, unless specifically stated to the contrary. Performance standards are set for the following items : exterior storage; refuse; construction materials; bulk storage of liquids; grading, filling and excavation; screening; landscaping requirements; tree and woodland preservation; exterior lighting; noise and vibration; smoke and particulate matter; odor; toxic or noxious matter; hazardous materials or waste, infectious waste, and pollutants; radiation; electromagnetic interference; receive-only satellite dish antennas and other antenna devices; preservation of surface waters; ground water protection; and sight triangles. SEC. 11.61. PARKING. The purpose for the regulation of off-street parking is to alleviate or prevent congestion of the public right- of-way and to promote the safety and general welfare of the public by establishing minimum requirements for off-street parking of vehicles based on the use of the land. Property in the central business zone is exempt from the off-street parking requirements. This section covers where a vehicle may be parked, use of parking facilities, maintenance, regulations for residential parking, opportunities for combining parking lots, design standards for the parking facilities, and the number of parking spaces that are required. SEC. 11.62 . DRIVEWAYS. The purpose of the regulation of driveways is to alleviate or prevent congestion of the public right-of-way and to promote the safety and general welfare of the public by establishing minimum requirements for driveways based on the use of the land. This section covers the use and maintenance of driveways, limitations on shared driveways, and how a parking facility is to be designed. SEC. 11.63 . LOADING FACILITIES. The purpose of the regulation of off-street loading is to alleviate or prevent congestion of the public right-of-way and to promote the safety and general welfare of the public by establishing minimum requirements for loading and unloading from vehicles based on the use of the land. This section covers the use and maintenance of loading spaces, how a loading space shall be designed, and the required number of loading spaces . SEC. 11.70. SIGNS. The existing sign provisions in Chapter 4 of the City Code were revised to match the new provisions of the zoning ordinance, and then inserted into the new zoning ordinance. SEC. 11.80. ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT. This section sets forth the responsibilities of the Zoning Administrator, general provision on notices and fees . SEC. 11 .81. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Certain provisions apply to all development . This section discusses development standards, accessory structures, required yards, exemptions for utilities, and the number of buildings per lot . SEC. 11.82 . PLANNING COMMISSION. The Planning Commission shall provide assistance to the City Council in the administration of this Chapter; and shall review all matters referred to them, including land acquisitions and dispositions, and capital improvements. The Planning Commission shall review and hold public hearings on all applications for official mapping requests, comprehensive plan amendments, and zoning ordinance amendments using the criteria set forth in this ordinance. SEC. 11.83 . ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS. Amendments may be in the form of changes to the text of the zoning ordinance or changes to the zoning map. All amendments shall promote the public health, safety, and welfare and be consistent with the comprehensive plan. Specific criteria and procedures are established for granting an amendment . Detailed provisions for planned unit developments are set. These include criteria for granting a planned unit development application, requirements for both a concept plan review and a development plan review. SEC. 11.84. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS. The powers, duties, and procedures of the Board are set. SEC. 11.85. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS. In granting a conditional use permit, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, and general welfare of the occupants of surrounding lands and the City as a whole, and make specific findings regarding the proposed use. In granting a conditional use permit or altering an existing conditional use permit, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals or the City Council may impose conditions in addition to those specified in this Chapter in order to preserve the health, safety, or welfare of the community or in order to implement the purposes of this Chapter or the comprehensive plan. A conditional use permit may expire if not used, and may be revoked for violation of any condition of the permit, requirement of this Chapter, or violation of state or federal law or regulation. SEC. 11.86. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONES. Conditions were established for each of the uses listed as conditional uses in the residential zones. SEC. 11.87. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS FOR BUSINESS ZONES. Conditions were established for each of the uses listed as conditional uses in the business zones. A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person at the office of the City Clerk and at the Scott County Library. I/c MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: CSAH 15 (Adams Street) DATE: June 1, 1994 INTRODUCTION: A public hearing has been scheduled for June 7, 1994 to consider the proposed assessments for the County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 15 Project. BACKGROUND: Scott County is proposing to reconstruct Adams Street (CSAH 15) from Tahpah Park to 6th Avenue this summer. In accordance with their cost participation policy, the City will be required to pay for a portion of this project, including 50% of the curb and gutter. The total estimated City cost for the curb and gutter is $22,572.32 including the required engineering costs. The City Council recently amended the City of Shakopee Special Assessment Policy to include assessments for cost participation items on County road project. Based on the amended policy, the City's curb and gutter costs will be assessed. The City must hold a public hearing to consider the proposed assessments prior to the County awarding the contract. Based on that, the City Council directed staff to set a public hearing to consider the assessments for June 7, 1994 by Resolution No. 3999. Of the total City cost for the curb and gutter, the total amount proposed to be assessed is $12,858.38. Adjustments were made for double fronting lots, corner lots and other adjustments in accordance with the Special Assessment Policy. Attached is the proposed assessment roll listing each property and their estimated assessment. Staff will give a presentation on the assessment calculations at the public hearing. At the conclusion of the public hearing, if the City Council determines that this project shall be ordered, attached is Resolution No. 4013 which order the improvements. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt resolution No. 4013. 2. Deny Resolution No. 4013. RECOMMENDATION: In accordance with the current Special Assessment Policy, staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4013, A Resolution Ordering an Improvement for County State Aid Highway 15 (Adams Street) from 13th Avenue to 6th Avenue and move its adoption. DEH/pmp MEM4013 ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS FOR COUNTY ROAD 15 CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Double Fronting Lots The current Special Assessment Policy states that double fronting lots may be assessed 50% of each fronting street, or 100% of the local street only. Since the double fronting properties along County Road 15 front on both a local street and a County road, the policy has been applied so that 100% of the local street construction will be assessed, and construction on County Road 15 will not be assessed. The result of this policy is a 0% assessment rate in the assessment roll for all double fronting properties. This policy has been applied to the following properties in the assessment roll: Lot 1, Blk. 1 Jackson View Addition Outlot A Jackson View Addition Lots 1-12, Blk. 9 Jackson View Addition Outlot A South Parkview 1st Addition Corner Lot Adjustments The current Assessment Policy allows for a corner lot adjustment of 50% of the footage on the shortest side. This policy has been applied to the following properties: Description Short Side Footage Lot 1, Blk. 1 Replat of Notermann Addn. 119 Lot 1, Blk. 1 South Parkview 1st Addn. 100 State Correctional Facility 1060 Sweeney Elementary School 670 The result of this policy is a 50% assessment rate based on the adjusted front footage as shown above. Odd Shaped Lot Adjustments The current Assessment Policy allows for an odd shaped lot adjustment if the length of the front and rear lot lines differs in length by more than two feet. Application of this policy will change the front footage for a parcel, but the assessment rate will remain at 100%. The odd shaped lot adjustment has been applied to the following properties. Description Adjusted Front Feet PID # 27-912037-0 235 PID # 27-912038-0 520 Front Foot Assessments All other properties in the assessment roll are being assessed 100% based on the actual frontage of their lot. The assessment per front foot for all properties in the assessment roll is $3.98. Assessment Amount The current Special Assessment Policy allows for assessing 100% of the City's costs for curb and gutter on County road projects within the City limits of Shakopee. The total City cost for curb and gutter on County Road 15 (including Engineering costs) is $22,572.32. The total adjusted front footage for this project is 5,671 feet. The assessment rate per front foot is $3.98. N cm aO U0 o Lr) co (Ni) cco coNv E co N co cc M O OO O CO Ts E Efl E9 Efl Efl ER N N CO CO Ef3 EA E9' 69- O cA H O U) N V a o ( C 0 O O O O O O O O N cn O O O O O O O O a) E T T T T T T T T U V/ �I a) /C v (U LL (� 1 y a �+ ›+ 0 O 0 O O O O O O '^ .Q .0 O O O O O O O O O I-0 t) 1'- C) a) N O CO N- N-N- N N co CO Q 0 0u. 0 a 0 a CC I-- Z 3 c c c c c c c c O o - a U Q a a a a c a a C C C C C C C CC E E E E E E E p as c cd c al c c T c O cn L L L L L LL x -a - -O m a) U) w a m a O O O o O O o / J__J , c •— C T Z T Z T Z T Z T Z (V) Z M Z Y as p cC Y p Y p __ p Y O Y o Y O Y O W m cJo CO c E — E — E — cC E — E — co 2 Z N- O O O W J Z U) Z J cc J cc J m J cc J cc J CC J CC COLU W • Q O = I= C IC O > C O Q rn rn rn d rn > rn 0 rn rn 2 rn o) co• La ra r � � t•--• ,,,x � _ .. � c ,rr c N CC i M M M M CO O CO O CO C O CO W O co W G O °) a) to (1) -- co -- in as .-. (o -- .-. in < a) co ' -- co >, a) co a) cn I— — 0 3 C (" as aa)) `n L aa)) `n Cd Q) u) o `n _ '- LO a C) (n > L () U) Q CC O O s c = ` C T ` c .Q C L l" C O c c w CCli � • W a x ( 2x02O0 m02ai0 .. E2Oas w — Env er (/J D O -0 O O -0 a.0 -0 O cc -0 O -0 O O a O U -0 O co a O LL' a 0 (IS a Y cr$ a Y 'et- a Y O a 0 a) a 0_Ne C Y , a Y L O7 3 v_) co Y W , � cNv � R N s `, cv as co -c Cl) (CQy s -, Nn . " ccoo .0 a) N. � � 0 .0 0 0 -c Q Q co cn co cn (o O [D CO a (o cn (D cn (o cn O cn J cn Z II N •- 0 0 0 0 `k 0I 0 0 O O I Q M I M U) co N- M O IU E 0 co O co O O O N N CL mMcr) in O O O O O O O O O O 1..i U N Z T T T T ,- 0 T ,- c) *- o T CC v D >- _O CO O OI 0 OI O OI OI OI CL U 2 d N N N N �N N N N N N N N 0 O O O O O O O O O O O C cx cd cc 0OOO OO a) T CY) ;7) 69 69 vA^ di 69 dT CO N OT 69 i Ts O (n co Q q O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O , O O O O \�! 'il . E a) T T ." V �, N cv CCU) Q >, >s O O o o O o O O o L L - O O O O O O O O O I) - -o o }, O O 6 M (O T N h.: r Oa) a) co co Mo N N co N. N- (d U CI i a) < a `a O U CC I- z D c c c c 00 a a 010 0 ° Q a Q o c c c c y c c c O Lo .,.) -oo a a '0 -0 CC o m O ° 8 8 � � ° o a a a a a C'i^)IL cm ) Z MZ MZ Qa W- " 0 rn5 0) 5 rn > 0) > VJ w 13 Y O 'O - in Y Y_ Y cY c Y C Z Y O Y O O .5 • m o m o mc mo mc'^ m Y m �c (/) Z v/ miii . (d L (d O 0 M co T y T N y M Y cW Z ~p Q) p a) p 0 W 0 T O (� O as O (� O cd J CZS c c w J cc J Q J cc n_ Z U) Z J --) _I -JJ -) J -7 m G c C w w cd U) > c E p a) Y N U < O O O Q) 1.1_ C Y _ M Q) E M L a0) O L p 0 Q) D co a) a) C M C3 O U .- a O a) C C t` m M CO CO p CO hs Y N M Q co O M O Cn co O Cn Lo > in N to 4) t1) F ) (f) _ a) c .O a) a) 'L m a) L L c 1 U c (n c 22 (n L- c (n al a) (n a) in pc� ? C •a E � C c (pun c c (pin c C i4 c 3 c cn c cn c < W E2 4 � 2 � � 2 � 2 a`� a) 2ao � 2d 17') 2 c„ � 2 a) � 2 45 L L c m cd a) m C 4) (d .0 a) �- E .S E as a as 0 -)) aoi -3 aa) oz3 •5 a) >., 2 a) c a) U 5 o //)H n a p -3u, n ,( O0 a -Q 0� J U) p }, Cn p -3 ,- prx p T o a)O. 0 O oS O. 0 O Li 0 Cn •y C Q Y •o Q .. V) Cr) Y N Cr) Y M Y co N Y (n Ln Y M W cd C as '5 O (d 'C (d Ln cd +� O cd a) M (d (n N cd = M cd O M L'^ a) '• L (a 1It) �.0 L O �L/� L 0 CC T _C ��•-�.[[ N �-C __= T .c /(Cd T �_C Y- a Q Z U) O N U) 0 h. m O T V/ U T u) 5 T u) 0 T u) m T 1) LL T U) w Z 11 �- O 0 O O O O O O O (� N (Nv) Q i 1 1 I OI r- I N M O 0 N E c`-\I co N N. N CV N- O co M M M_ a. m 0 0 Or ON O^ 0 0 O - () Z T T T N N N N (V a) N O O O O 0I OI OI OI OI a O di E:0 N I N I N I N- N N N- N- N a. 0 2 n_ NN N N N N N N O O O O O O O 0 N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w EA (09. 69- (fl FA CO FA Efl O) ctiE (7> ki O CC/ ) I-- 0 y Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C O O O O O O O O in r.) (4 a) E .iicor Q) CC U) Q >, A O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 _0 _0 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 LU a 'c o NZ N- I- N- N- N. I\ r O T4)Y L._ h. n n n n n n CO 0 r Qa) -o LL O a U cC I— z D o 0 -o U < a U C C C C C C C C +-' 0 o CC �_ Q a a a a a Q a a) N a) C) a) C) N Y5 _ a vJ J O) CCY 5 CO Y > Y (SS I-- Y C Y C Y C Y C Y C m C m C Cl) C Z (n m o m o m o m O m o o O m W H in Y Y Cl)co up 0) OYr •,• u) NYr r C z - U CZ I� U CS N U CZ f+ 0 JCZ 00 CZ 0 JY 0 0 Cli CO JY W JJ -) J - -3 J -) - J -) -3 J U 2 W W CD() 0 O a) U) Q O O cis O O O Q) O Q) C) Y �- Q) 0 >. N. N N- o6 N >�_ N o c C) 1.t. i a� Ch N — M J O C7 - a) Q) ,-. ico n > •.. co �. co J N ch W 2 � o � � � � ..• in p. C cd a) in CD Lo -a N to 0 N La 2 in O $ i � in a) L in c U) in • ,(2 3 O }. C .`-� 0) .`. — -C }' • a) C C O cn C .- cn c in c _E U) c cn c o cn c N co c o U) C o o Qc W 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 > 2 6 2 U o 2 o 0 2 2 _ a 2 `G F.- a) C O 0 .0 O •C aj o .0 m C a) J .0 a) m -C a) a) .0 a) 06 a) r- 1 - = .O a) ,nO a) O a) — = a) O a) N = Q ?� C a) J C a) _, co a) O o ca O O Ocl) O O O O «- O o (� Q o C O O D_ O O o •- c Y E O) -Y L I� Y V in Y ..' co Y E N- Y c T Y (i O) Y Y (D Y W C �(/C� O �(/0� co to �(/o� -- co, �(/o� > CO �(/o� O 00 �(/o� �_O{ or) �- SLR O co- O N co .0 Q I-% U 1- U) f- r U) O r U) 2 r U) > r U) F- r U) O T U) O r U O T U) w Z �1 N - O O O O 0 0 0 0 O (n a-� coa) I I I I I I I I I OLa co ,- .:2- r /'� /yQ O E M co M M co M V' O A W - 0 T TN ,- ,:r ,- .o- ;17 , - coN 0 cE U Z N N N N N N CC D Q O 0.1 ta m OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI I 0- U 2 d m N N N N N N N N N o 0 co O 1- co co o N co co r co a)I to Oro O M M CO tri ai co Tz Lo T M O O CO Ln E N N T N N O V) CA to b4 *- NI U) U) U Q 0 0 0 0 04O O O O O O +, -. CO 0 M O O E a)cn T T T ( ‘' a) LL U) U) \ Q >, >, 0 O O O O 0 O N a) co .0 ..O - +-' 0 0 o O O O 0 CO M CO M LO C T N M CO M r a) a) OL ) r to a) Or M N r r U) it) -1- i-. `- �C LL co N co O co N Lo CO to CO r•- 121 � Q as o _ T In c\i N O Q CD 0 Q CV E9 U O CC Ts II II II II o n o ami N I— ~ U � o U) 0 Z O M > T U C co D c T co Z a) o `n U Z Z o LLCD Q D Q Z M co N T N L aa O > T a) N L > T TT O CC N ) U) r r a) O C L > > O ~ a) Q T Q O Co = r x Z C Z F- a) co O� �, a) � CDQ � U) a) yr QT E c '^ > N M O Q r N 0 vJ a) Y co Z M r T co Z CD O M co r > z �. Q d. N C < N Co <t CV > i '- '-' N C N O .S Q W f�" p c .- to O ,- CO O r e- Z c) „ a) . < co O M T C) r T 0 Lo r r CO T a) T co 2/ z 3' O N N x CV O X O N ' W 4 N Cn N T VJ W O co r co a) r co o r T lL V/ Z co r 1- r r 0.6 W W Q O N O '. Q) Q) V r Q) a) c• � Y O r '-' r O U ''' r a) r a) r W G '- N J O M TO N a) a) to 0- 3 c W La a) cA 1 U - n p Cn `n ami v) `n ai U) a) < n`_ O m o c o a g o m • o a) g Y aa)i g Y aa)i 2 2_ s E amici o 2 2 E SD cz E a) cz E C) H m acn = Q E = Q CD i a = n U -) o v) m a u) o 0 0 L1-1 (�� Y (T° a _>. a) as 0- o °) to rn U) a) as O U r U .- W 0 M v) 'C in u) U r W U .- W W II N 0 0 O O O O • Qc'") ▪ CD I•-• 4 CO I� co N. N N M CO O O M M CL CO Q) 0 co E 0 O o N N N M cm O r (� o Z N r T r T T a) N 0 T a) O 0) CT a) CC D Q O d r r I r r r N- 0_ 0 2 li N N N N N N RESOLUTION NO. 4013 A Resolution Ordering An Improvement For County State Aid Highway 15 (Adams Street) From 13th Avenue To 6th Avenue WHEREAS, Resolution No. 3999, adopted on May 3, 1994, fixed a date for Council hearing on the proposed improvement of County State Aid Highway 15 (Adams Street) between 13th Avenue and 6th Avenue by curb and gutter; and WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held on the 7th of June, 1994 at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS,this project will be constructed by Scott County with City cost participation in accordance with Cooperative Agreement No. 15-9402; and WHEREAS,the City of Shakopee desires to assess a portion of this project in accordance with the Special Assessment Policy. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. That the improvement is ordered as hereinafter described: Installation of curb and gutter on County State Aid Highway 15 (Adams Street) between 13th Avenue and 6th Avenue by Scott County under Cooperative Construction Agreement No. 15-9402. 2. The Scott County Highway Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement, and shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney ' CONSEI\IT Memo to: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator From: Mark McQuillan, Recreation Supervisor Subject : Fees for Adult Baseball Teams - Res. No. 4018 Date : May 25, 1994 Introduction On May 23 , 1994 , a representative from the Shakopee Town Baseball Team appeared before the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board to request that the City waive the $300 Recreation Activity Fee for their team, the American Legion baseball team and the 35 and Over baseball team. Last year, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommended to the City Council to include the aforementioned teams in the Parks and Recreation 1994 Fee Schedule. The fee was set at $300 . 00 each which is consistent with the fee being charged to adult softball teams . Background Prior to 1994, the adult baseball teams were not charged a user fee either by the City or the former Shakopee Recreation Board. Over the years, these organizations operated independently and received little administrative assistance other than reserving use of the baseball field. However, these teams do benefit from such services as field maintenance and use of the lights at no cost . At the April 25, 1995 PRAB meeting, it was noted that no-one from these organizations was invited to discuss the new fee before it was adopted last year. This was an oversight on the City' s part and perhaps unfair to the parties affected by the decision. Common Factors 1 . Unlike the adult softball teams, these teams do not rely on funding from various sponsors . e.g. Pullman Club, K-mart, Turtles, etc . Most of their expenses (umpires, equipment, uniforms etc . ) are paid by the players . The exception would be the Legion baseball team. The Shakopee American Legion Post #2 budgets a certain amount funds to cover some of the baseball team' s expenses . 2 . All three teams use the Tahpah Park Baseball Stadium. 3 . All three teams play in leagues involving teams from other communities . 4 . All three teams are considered community (Shakopee) town baseball teams in their respective programs . Town Team The Shakopee Town Baseball Team was instrumental in the development i of the Tahpah Park baseball stadium. Through their volunteer efforts they moved and re-installed the old light towers from Riverside Park, raised funds for the construction of a 600 seat grandstand, constructed two dugouts and built the batting eye and batting cages at no cost to the tax payers. The Town Team uses the baseball stadium for 15 home games and a few playoff games . Legion Team The Legion baseball team uses the baseball stadium for seven home games . They are funded by the Shakopee American Legion Post #2 . This program is primarily for boys 16 & 17 years old. Technically, this is a youth team and they should be charged the same fee as other youth programs which is $13 per player. The 35 and Over Baseball Team This team is comprised of players over the age of thirty-five. Most of the players are former Town Team members who play for the pure enjoyment of the game and fellowship. They use the baseball stadium when other local baseball teams in the community are not using it . They are on the bottom of the "pecking order" when comes to using the stadium. Many of the players were involved in the construction of the baseball stadium as members of the Town Team. ALTERNATIVES 1 . Direct staff to develop a formula that will be fair for each of these teams . The drawback to this approach is that other teams or programs may wish to negotiate different fee structure . Perhaps its time to re-evaluate the fee structure for all recreation activities and the level of service we should or should not be providing user groups. 2 . Amend the budget for 1994 to eliminate the fee for the Town Team, Legion Team and 35 and Over Team, but a fee would be implemented for 1995 . 3 . Amend the budget for 1994 to eliminate the fee for the Town Team, Legion Team and 35 and Over Team and not charge them in the future as well . 4 . Make no changes to the fee policy. RECOMMENDATION At their May 23 , 1994 meeting, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommended to the City Council to amend the 1994 City Fee Schedule eliminating the $300 Activity Fee for the Town, Legion and 35 and Over baseball teams, but to develop a new fee structure or formula for 1995 . ACTION REQUESTED Offer Resolution No. 4018, a Resolution amending Resolution No. 3924 adopting the 1994 Fee Schedule eliminating the $300 Recreation Activity Fee for the Shakopee Town Baseball team, American Legion Baseball team and 35 and Over Baseball Team and move for its adoption. RESOLUTION NO. 4 018 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 3924 ADOPTING THE 1994 FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 3924 approving a fee schedule for the City of Shakopee; and WHEREAS, changing conditions and circumstances warrant amending the 1994 Fee Schedule with respect to the recreation activity fee for the Shakopee Town Baseball Team, the American Legion Baseball Team and the 35 and Over Baseball Team. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota that the $300 . 00 Recreation Activity Fee for the Shakopee Town Baseball Team, the American Legion Baseball Team and the 35 and Over Baseball Team is hereby deleted from the 1994 Fee Schedule . Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of 1994 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney CONSENT / 16 Memo to: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator From: Mark McQuillan. Recreation Supervisor Re : Cooperative Trail Grant - Resolution No. 4019 Date : May 27, 1994 INTRODUCTION On May 17, 1994 , the City was notified by the Grants Officer for the Minnesota Cooperative Trail Grant Program that our revised application to link up the Shakopee Upper Valley Drainageway Trail System to the Minnesota Valley State Trail has passed the initial review process for funding. However, there is a check list of additional requirements that need to be full-filled before final approval . They include the following: a resolution by the City Council to proceed with the project, an Environmental Assessment Statement (EAS) , pre-approval of the project by the State Historic Preservation Office, a Waters Permit from The Department of Natural Resources and pre-approval by the The Minnesota Department of Transportation to place the trail through the underpass on Highway 101 . BACKGROUND On November 11, 1993, staff submitted a grant application to link the Minnesota Valley Trail System to the City' s Upper Valley Drainway Trail by routing the trail to the south, through the underpass of State Highway 101 to a service road on the south side of Highway 101 . The trail will then travel east along the service road to Sarazin Street (sometimes refered to as Viking Steel Road) where it will traverse along Sarazin Street to County Road 16 . From County Road 16, the trail will head south adjacent to Mauer Trail and east where it will intersect with the existing Upper Valley Drainageway. Refer to map on Attachment "A" . At this stage, we are uncertain if the City will be able to place the trail through the underpass of Highway 101 until the proper permits are approved. If they are not, a new route for the trail will be explored. The next step in this process is for the City Council to adopt a resolution indicating it will provide matching funds for this project . If we successfully meet all grant application requirements and are approved for funding, the project would proceed in the Spring of 1995 . The City' s 506- match is included in the 5 Yr. CIP and the funding source proposed is the Capital Improvement Fund. ALTERNATIVES 1 . Move to offer a resolution to provide matching funds to be at least 50% of the total project cost for the connection of the Minnesota Valley Trail System with the City' s Upper Valley Drainageway Trail System as required by the Minnesota Cooperative Trail Grant Program. 2 . Move to table the proposed resolution until more information is available about the permits needed to place the trail under the highway. 3 . Move to turn down the Cooperative Trail Grant to connect the City' s Trail System to the Minnesota Valley Trail System. RECOMMENDATION Alternative #1 At its May 23 , 1994 meeting, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommended to the City Council to offer a resolution to provide matching funds to be at least 500 of the total project cost for the connection of the Minnesota Valley Trail System with the City' s Upper Valley Drainageway Trail System as required by the Minnesota Cooperative Trail Grant Program. ACTION REQUESTED Offer Resolution No. 4019, a resolution to provide matching funds to be at least 50% of the total project cost for the connection of the Minnesota Valley Trail System with the City' s Upper Valley Drainageway Trail System as required by the Minnesota Cooperative Trail Grant Program. CC.R1 N j if/ = C7 I. ` �, N=0 D 0 � r, � O r !Li rn 'Tl 11 'iv, . 1_......_:-1 arm\ :t,, \ .-7- r"76 D r- rT1 • VM l7i� ® �, Z f :s....:. r*i D r ithik. _i1 .00-.A. 1 =* \ azo �l ,, illsitlillt,\ t I i CI imilecigs �. 1s1. \\ 73 .-rn rri 11010 WI ��j�Ji 1T,1� T It I \� O CA CI uNt:rr. !: mo \ , ,\ ;„,., } ][ 2\11-1.11, non . .. 1. . - --VIVI m g_iii r... . .ft —•/' -` MO f•flt 10311 000 u-la s t » � 51-0Y, - i D 51 Tii,0 .-- -EK31''' .--` .---. oulo ` 4 -- I ®`r I i t -c-,00,.. pi i) /22 4,413',1 F .• : - N .,,tal .. ri ././ / - u.... 4r5r\, . \\ rID-D : rE -1) =.;,-,-. r • •.•. -±- 1.-------' 0 \N‘,...„ ,,,,.....=?-=,,-1\ OD o I M \`rte'\\ \.:-:. .,\. , ` , I I —i 'l. C• "cc "'"'";;4 �\�.\��\•.•\ -'.\4.1 \•'A ' ' N.,\ =\ N. ♦T`-\v.`h 0.\I I � ".. %\ ` \ y o ; a \\ ;\ 1\ \ ; -..\-,:r,,, D "1 , trt: K � t • \ 1 moi:'': `. .\�\ `:�`,\\�` ��P. oA. \ ', _. ',..,-,4. 1-e!t%..-' \ \: ,�\\ \ rzk ef `1 + -- — 1 �\ �I 1 •\. RESOLUTION NO. 4019 A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE CITY' S PARTICIPATION IN THE MINNESOTA COOPERATIVE TRAIL GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council cf the City of Shakopee to provide park and recreation opportunities that enhance the quality of life and insure and protect the public safety of Shakopee' s residents; and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee finds it desirous to link the Minnesota Valley Trail System to the City' s Upper Valley Drainage Trail ; and WHEREAS, the City has submitted a grant application in response to the Minnesota Cooperative Trail Grant Program; and WHEREAS, successful grant applicants are required to fund at least 500 of the total project cost through local funding mechanisms . NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Shakopee hereby supports participating in the Minnesota Cooperative Trail Grant Program and supports the use of local matching funds to be applied to at least 500 of the total project cost for the connection of the Minnesota Valley Trail System with the City' s Upper Valley Drainageway Trail System. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1994 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney i3 &, MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Sidewalks at 8th and Spencer (9 DATE: June 1, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Staff is requesting City Council response to Mr. Jack Anderson's April 23, 1994 correspondence related to sidewalks at 8th Avenue and Spencer Street. BACKGROUND: During the design of the 8th Avenue Reconstruction Project in 1993, staff requested City Council direction on dealing with sidewalks that were only partially constructed on a block and not connected to any continuous pedestrian system. Specifically, on 8th Avenue, west of Spencer Street there was existing sidewalks on the south side of the street on only 3/5 of the block (180 feet out of 300 feet). The League of Minnesota Insurance Trust has expressed a liability concern over sidewalks that are partially constructed on a block. The Council directed staff to remove this sidewalk as part of the street reconstruction project, rather than adding additional sidewalk to complete the block. This block is not on the Comprehensive Sidewalk and Trail Plan adopted by the City Council for locating sidewalks. Since that time, both property owners that have sidewalk have expressed a desire to retain the existing sidewalk. Mr. Jack Anderson, owner of 736 Spencer Street, submitted a letter to Council requesting that the sidewalk remain. On May 3, 1994 the Council discussed this request and directed staff to research this issue and prepare a policy to address future such requests. Staff has inspected the sidewalk and reviewed the street plans. Based on this review, the existing sidewalk does not need to be removed due to the street construction, but there are approximately 6-8 squares of sidewalk(40 feet)that are cracked, broken or off set that should be replaced. The rest of the sidewalk is in fair condition. The liability issue still exists. The City Attorney is also concerned about liability and has indicated that the Council should either install sidewalks on an entire block or have none at all, strictly from a liability issue. Council should evaluate the potential risk for leaving this sidewalk in at the property owners request. The City Attorney has also indicated that indemnifying the City on partial sidewalk installations may not prevent a future suit against the City because of property owner changes or the financial ability of the property owner to pay. In regards to a policy, staff has prepared the attached policy for Council consideration. One item on the policy that should be discussed by Council is Item #1, regarding a request for sidewalks. The policy currently requires a majority of the property owners to petition for the sidewalk, but the City would then install the sidewalks on the entire block. Should the policy increase the required number of property owners that must petition for the sidewalk, say to 75% or even 100%? If the policy requires 100%, it is highly unlikely that any neighborhood would receive sidewalks on a local street, or should the majority vote of a neighborhood rule? Staff would like City Council direction on this item. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4015, A Resolution Establishing a Policy on the Installation of Sidewalks on Local, Residential Streets and move its adoption. DEH/pmp MEM4015 /Dw An•erson's Furniture Stripping Center - 1:os S PROCESS PP"'�Houck's Stri Process— 3S0 Dealers in 43 States and Still Growing Rt. =2 Box 578 - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 C/4. 4:410ee 4) �, �a8 te/b -2 3 c, LQ_. 4.4vt-4-A-�� • r -.p mss✓ 'Z`*- 1 0,1 a7G'S� RESOLUTION NO. 4015 A Resolution Establishing A Policy On The Installation Of Sidewalks On Local, Residential Streets WHEREAS, the City Council of Shakopee has adopted a Comprehensive Sidewalk and Trail Plan which identifies the location of a pedestrian network of sidewalks and trails which will be constructed over time based on the Capital Improvements Program and financial ability of the City; and 'WHEREAS, the City Council feels that sidewalks on local, residential streets are a neighborhood issue and therefore sidewalks are not required on local streets. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY'ME CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: that if a neighborhood desires sidewalks on a particular block, the City Council will consider such a request if the following conditions are met: 1. The sidewalks must be petitioned for by the owners of a majority of the property between two streets. The City Council will then install sidewalks on the entire block or blocks between the two streets. 2. Sidewalks will be installed either on one side of the street or both, depending on the petition from the neighborhood. 3. During street reconstructions, partial sidewalks that do not extend the entire block will not be allowed to remain. They will either be removed completely or extended across the remainder of the block depending on the desires of the property owners in the block. The entire block must be in agreement to complete the sidewalk. 4. The Standard City Assessment Policy would apply, which indicates that new sidewalks are assessed 100% to the abutting property owners. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney ..011114* V//z ( et =___Lil 1 E -. 11111 pilli 1.111 Mil/ I 1 [ --- 14100)--Aor EV / • 1 ' . s 1 1_71 -i \ A E Aim . . Ca_. /A 'is . 1 , 1 1 i < > _<_ - [ ____: 1 4-- -- > Ill EN .... la I , 1 , 0_ LI INNu Milli a 1'1 — 0 Y V 'Ct Wiliiii6 111 MO ael. -- (n J MS IIIII o -,--- - . log,.., e 2 2 \ -1-, c s Li I I ---1 < - owl.. la-111 L. AM oil cl_ 01111 WO 11116 1°°1 IS 1111111 1.° . < LIr0 SI W. Will ,„ ow WO 1 III ill 1-- A A :S CCz 1117 WOOS .----0 = I= WO lig Sti-41 ell4 0100 wX Z ,1, 100 f. .. .1----- 0 0 SS ll lig arg IVAS ill L ::: sow, 1.1 •••• ... _ via glow woo — \--- vo — VD O•osi los soco we Iowa 1111 we 111111 11111.. fig 11111 rag WI govili iTto VZIrillwi '--: [ L CONSENT / 5 MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SUBJECT: Pawnshop and Pawnbroker's Licenses DATE: June 3 , 1994 INTRODUCTION: On April 19 , 1994 , the City Council adopted an ordinance requiring the licensing of pawnbrokers, precious metal dealers, secondhand dealers, pawnshops, and their employees. The City has received applications from two pawnshops and their employees for licenses. BACKGROUND: The City has received an application from Johan W. Nelson to operate as a pawnbroker, precious metal dealer and secondhand dealer at American Pawnbrokers, Inc. , 450 West 1st Avenue. The police department has conducted the customary background investigation on Mr. Nelson and his four employees. The investigations disclosed nothing to prohibit the issuance of licenses. The City has received an application from Frank John Marzario to operate as a pawnbroker at Shakopee Pawn & Cash Co. , 1147 Canterbury Road. The police department has conducted the customary background investigation on Mr. Marzario and his eight employees. The investigations disclosed nothing to prohibit the issuance of the licenses with one exception. The investigation did reveal that one employee does not meet the requirements of the ordinance and his approval is not recommended by the Chief of Police. ALTERNATIVES: 1] Approve licenses and employees 2] Deny licenses and approval of employees 3] Approve licenses and some employees RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative number 3 , approval of the two business licenses, the two pawnbrokers licenses and of employees who meet the requirements of the ordinance. Pawnshop Licenses June 3 , 1994 Page -2- RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1] Approve the application and grant a Pawnshop License to American Pawnbrokers, Inc. , 450 West 1st Avenue. 2 ] Approve the application and grant a Pawnbroker, Metal Dealer and Secondhand Dealer's license to Johan W. Nelson, American Pawnbrokers, Inc. , 450 West 1st Avenue. 3 ] Approve the applications and grant licenses to the following employees of American Pawnbrokers, Inc. : Timothy E. O'Leary, Dennis W. Nelson, Patrick T. Rockne, and Samuel Dean Rockne, 4] Approve the application and grant a Pawnshop license to Shakopee Pawn & Cash Co. , 1147 Canterbury Road. 5] Approve the application and grant a Pawnbroker's license to Frank J. Marzario, Shakopee Pawn & Cash Co. , 1147 Canterbury Road. 6] Approve the applications and grant licenses to the following employees of Shakopee Pawn & Cash Co. : Sherrie L. Marzario, John R. Richards, Budd J. Rutter, II, Michael L. Gould, Nicholas P. Falco, Jessica C. Dold, and Corey L. Johnson. C N MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Stop Sign Study at 7th Avenue and Dakota Street DATE: May 31, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Staff has received numerous citizen requests to review the intersection of 7th Avenue and Dakota Street for stop signs. BACKGROUND: As part of the Milwaukee Manor Subdivision, Dakota Street was connected between 5th Avenue and 7th Avenue,making this a through street. Because of the increased traffic on this street, staff received a citizen request to install stop signs at the intersection of 7th Avenue and Dakota Street last fall. The City Council directed staff to do a warrant study for this intersection. On April 5, 1994 the results of the warrant study were presented to the City Council. The warrant study indicated that the major street should be 7th Avenue based on the heavier traffic volumes and that Dakota Street should give the right-of-way to traffic on 7th Avenue. Currently, there are yield signs on Dakota Street and based on the steep grades from the south, staff recommended retaining the yield signs rather than replace them with stop signs. The warrant study also indicated that a 4-way stop sign was not warranted. Since the initial study was completed, there has been additional information provided, specifically, information regarding accidents. As of December 14, 1993, which was the date of the initial warrant study, there had been no accidents at that intersection. Since that date there have been four accidents. One of the accidents was caused by icy streets and the vehicle traveling northbound on Dakota Street being unable to stop and slid through the yield sign. The other three accidents did not involve icy conditions. The warrant study also identified a potential sight distance problem for northbound Dakota Street traffic being unable to see westbound 7th Avenue traffic adequately. This may have been a contributing factor in two of the accidents. Because of the short time frame this intersection has been opened up, the history in regards to traffic counts and accidents is still developing. But based on the new information to date, staff has received numerous citizen requests to review the traffic control at this intersection again. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Do nothing, which would leave yield signs up on Dakota Street. 2. Replace the yield signs with stop signs on Dakota Street. 3. Install 4-way stop signs at this intersection. 4. Direct staff to do another warrant study. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 2, to replace the yield signs with stop signs. Staff feels that the original warrant study is still valid and that another warrant study is not needed. The original study basically recommended either leaving the yield signs up on Dakota Street or replacing them with stop signs. Since there was no accident history at the time, staff recommended leaving the yield signs in place, due to the steep grades making it difficult to stop in winter. Based on the new accident information, staff feels the sight distance problem may be a larger factor then icy street conditions. Since the original study recommended either option, staff recommends replacing the yield signs with stop signs. There are number of intersections in Shakopee that are high priority for sanding/salting based on safety concerns and this intersection will be included in that high priority list in order to minimize icy conditions preventing vehicles from being able to stop at this intersection. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to direct staff to replace the yield signs at 7th Avenue and Dakota Street with stop signs. DEH/pmp WARRANT CONT 3C, MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft. City Administrator FROM: Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer ',r)tt/ SUBJECT: Stop Sign Study at 7th Avenue & Dakota Street DATE: March 29, 1994 BACKGROUND: The City Council of Shakopee ordered a warrant study for stop signs at the intersection of 7th Avenue and Dakota Street. Staff has completed the study and the results are attached. DISCUSSION: The study showed that this intersection had neither the accident history or the traffic volume to warrant a 4-way stop sign installation. This prompted staff to investigate other options. Currently, this intersection is controlled by yield signs on Dakota Street. The other options identified were to install stop signs on Dakota Street or to leave the existing yield signs on Dakota Street in place. Traffic control methods are proposed for Dakota Street rather than 7th Avenue because 7th Avenue has the higher traffic volumes. Of these two options, staff is recommending leaving the yield signs in place for the following reasons: 1. Stop signs impose a more restrictive traffic control that is not warranted by the traffic volumes. 2. The Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) recommends yield signs for intersections where the right-of-way should be assigned to a major roadway but a complete stop on the minor roadway is not necessary at all times. This situation applies to the intersection of 7th Avenue and Dakota Street. 3. The relatively steep grade and limited sight distance north bound on Dakota Street warrant some measure of traffic control above the uncontrolled intersections which are common in this area. Yield signs should provide the correct level of traffic control without being restrictive. ACTION REQUESTED: Maintain the status quo with yield signs on Dakota Street at 7th Avenue. DMN/pmp STOP WARRANTS FOR MULTI-WAY STOP SIGNS/ Intersection Analyzed: f t,41'-6TA Date 3-2.7- yq Initials rprik) The "Multiway Stop" installation is useful as a safety measure at some locations . It should ordinarily be used only where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal . A traffic control signal is more satisfactory for an intersection with a heavy volume of traffic . Any of the following conditions may warrant a WARRANTS multiway STOP sign installation. MET 1 . Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed , the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installation. 2 . An accident problem , as indicated by five or more reported accidents of a type susceptible of correction by a multiway stop IVO installation in a 12-month period . Such accidents include right - and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. 3 . Minimum traffic volumes : a . The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles /UD per hour for any 8 hours of an average day , and b. The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours , with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of a least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour , but c . When the 85 percentile approach speed of // the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles A//i4 per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements. COMMENTS 6K/57 /(CC.D 5/GN S cat i A «7 A S 145u/sO 86 44 6 a u4-r6 7�671i Traffic Volume Counts 7th Avenue & Dakota Street Time Dakota Street 7th Avenue of North South East West Day bound bound bound bound 1 :00 5 0 2 5 2:00 7 1 3 15 3:00 1 1 0 0 4:00 7 2 0 0 5:00 1 0 1 2 6:00 4 0 2 3 7:00 14 3 13 20 8:00 48 6 16 26 9:00 40 8 7 11 10:00 35 4 16 14 11 :00 39 12 13 18 Noon 41 8 18 22 1 :00 47 10 19 20 2:00 24 9 12 9 3:00 39 15 21 25 4:00 66 18 19 33 5:00 59 16 48 65 6:00 66 9 30 40 7:00 42 7 19 16 8:00 38 4 15 13 9:00 24 2 3 9 '10:00 26 5 16 17 11 :00 19 3 8 9 12:00 9 2 9 5 24 Hour 701 145 310 397 Total C O sU L. MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Karen Marty, City Attorne04 DATE: May 25, 1994 RE: Hiring of Assistant City Attorney BACKGROUND: On April 5, 1994, the City Council discussed whether to change the Assistant City Attorney from half-time to full-time. The Council agreed to make the position full-time. Although I had anticipated that the present Assistant City Attorney would take the position, but he surprised me and resigned in order to move to Mankato (where he has family) and take a full-time position as assistant county attorney. On April 12, 1994, the City Council authorized hiring a new assistant city attorney. On April 13, 1994, I met with Pam Johnson of the Scott County Personnel Department to initiate the hiring process. Ms. Johnson placed advertisements, reviewed and scored applications, and sent me the top ten applications to schedule interviews. Sgt. Ray Erlandsen, Barry Stock, and I conducted interviews of nine candidates over three days. The top three candidates after interviewing are Mark Erickson, Kevin Giebel, and Eric Short . Mark Erickson appears to have the best fit with the office and the position. He has worked both as a Judicial Law Clerk, and as an Assistant County Attorney. He is personable, and has extensive courtroom and trial experience. The position was advertised at step 1 on the pay scale. Any candidate must satisfactorily undergo a criminal history background check, a drug test, and a driver' s license check. ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Authorize the hiring of Mark Erickson. 2 . Authorize the hiring of Kevin Giebel . 3 . Authorize the hiring of Eric Short . RECOMMENDATION: Hire Mark Erickson. REQUESTED ACTION: Move to authorize the hiring of Mark Erickson as Assistant City Attorney at pay step 1, subject to satisfactory completion of a drug test, criminal history background check, and driver' s license check. [2 5MEMO] 0 0 CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: V. Paul Bilotta, Senior Planner RE: Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Prairie Bend PUD DATE: May 26, 1994 INTRODUCTION: On May 25, 1994, the 30 day comment period ended for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Prairie Bend Planned Unit Development. The City of Shakopee, as the Responsible Governing Unit (RGU), must now decide whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is necessary. BACKGROUND: The EAW was sent to 19 governmental agencies (Exhibit A) and a copy was sent to the Scott County Library for public viewing. Attached is a summary of the EAW review comments received by the City of Shakopee (Exhibit B) as well as the City's response to these comments. Copies of the review letters have also been attached (Exhibit C). DISCUSSION: The Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) has prepared EAW guidelines that state that an EIS shall be ordered for a project that has the potential for significant environmental effects. In deciding whether a project has the potential for significant effects, the RGU shall compare the impacts that may reasonably be expected to occur from the project with the following criteria: A. Type, extent, and reversibility of environmental effects. B. Accumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects. C. The extent to which environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority. D. The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the public proposer or of EIS's previously prepared. The RGU must apply the criteria to the factual information contained in the EAW, the comments received on the EAW and the responses and comments. It is essential that the RGU review the environmental effects as disclosed by the EAW and the comments, determine a reasonable conclusion about the significance of each of the environmental effects based on the facts disclosed and the criteria, and make a reasonable overall conclusion about the potential of the project for significant environmental effects. FINDINGS: In reviewing the four criteria, staff has found the following: Criteria A: Type, extent, and reversibility of environmental effects. Finding: Based on the comments from the review agencies, there do not seem to be any significant environmental effects that will result from this project. The site is currently used as cropland, so there is very little undisturbed natural habitat. The land use is largely consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Criteria B: Accumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects. Finding: The applicant has not identified any future expansions of this development. Criteria C: The extent to which environmental effects are subject to mitigation by an ongoing public regulatory authority. Finding: The City of Shakopee has development standards for retention ponds and stormwater runoff that could require additional lining or other measures to protect groundwater supplies and surface waters. In addition, the Minnesota Department of Health protects groundwater supplies by requiring the proper sealing of abandoned wells. Criteria D: The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the public proposer of EIS's previously prepared. 2 Finding: The applicant is proposing to build a mixed single- and multi-family development which is similar to developments that have occurred in Shakopee and throughout the metropolitan area. The performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance, building codes, and Subdivision Regulations have evolved over time to mitigate many of the potential impacts that can result from this type of development and should be sufficient for protection of the environment. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Make a negative declaration on the need for an EIS for the proposed Prairie Bend Planned Unit Development. 2. Make a positive declaration on the need for an EIS. 3. Table the decision on the need for an EIS to allow more time for commenting agencies to review the responses. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that a negative declaration on the need for an EIS be made by the City Council, based on the review of the EAW and the comments received. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4020, A Resolution Making a Negative Declaration on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the proposed Prairie Bend Planned Unit Development. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 4020 A RESOLUTION MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR PRAIRIE BEND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the proposed Prairie Bend Planned Unit Development in the City of Shakopee required the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW); and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee is the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU); and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee has prepared an EAW which was published, distributed and commented on in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 116D and Chapter 4410 of the Minnesota Rules; and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee has reviewed all comments received regarding the EAW and has prepared a response to all comments received. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Shakopee City Council that a negative declaration is hereby made on the proposed Prairie Bend Planned Unit Development. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney EXHIBIT A Environmental Quality Board Dept. of Public Service Environmental Review Program Jim Alan 300 Centennial Office Bldg. 200 Metro Square Building 658 Cedar St. 121 7th Place East EAW MAILING LIST St. Paul, MN 55155 St. Paul, MN 55101 Natural Resources Pollution Control Agency Transportation Dept. Tom Balcom Paul Hoff Gerald Larson Office of Planning Environmental Analysis Office Mn\DOT Environmental Services 500 Lafayette Rd. 520 Lafayette Rd. 3485 Hadley Ave. N. St. Paul, MN 55155 St. Paul, MN 55155 Oakdale, MN 55128 Health Department Rita Messing Agriculture Department Office of Waste Management Dinnaker Building_. Paul Burns Kevin Johnson P.O. Box 59040 90 W. Plato Blvd. 1350 Energy Lane 925 Delaware St. SE St. Paul, MN 55107 St. Paul, MN 55108 Minneapolis, MN 55459-0040 Board of Water&Soil Resources Historical Society Legislative Reference Library Doug Thomas State Historic Preservation Office Zona DeWitt 90 W. Plato Blvd. 345 Kellogg Blvd.W. 645 State Office Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55107 St. Paul, MN 55102 St. Paul, MN 55155 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Environmtl. Protection Agency Environmental Conservation Library Ben Wopat, Chief William D. Franz 300 Nicollet Mall Regulatory Functions Branch Chief of Environmental Review Brd. Minneapolis, MN 55401 1135 U.S. P.O. &Custom House .714 9......44 . el— St. Paul, MN 55101-1479 Chicago, IL 60604 (cL.,e,,�t S-(f-1 Metropolitan Council Shakopee Public Library U.S. Fish&Wildlife Service Linda Voge, Referrals Twin Cities Field Office E.S. Scott County Library Mears Park Centre 235 S. Lewis St. 4101 E. 80th St. 230 E.5th St. Bloomington, MN 55425-1665Shakopee, MN 55379 St. Paul, MN 55101 Jon Westlake Lower Minnesota River Watershed Brad Larson Scott County Planning Dept. Attn: Lawrence Samstad, Eng. Scott County Engineer 428 S. Holmes St. 527 Marschall Rd. Suite 200 600 Country Trail E. Shakopee, MN 55379 Shakopee, MN 55379 Jordan, MN 55352 Exhibit B EAW COMMENTS RECEIVED PRAIRIE BEND 1. 4/14/94 Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 2. 4/28/94 Scott County Highway Department 3. 5/6/94 Minnesota Historical Society 4. 5/10/94 Scott County Environmental Health 5. 5/23/94 Metropolitan Council 6. 5/25/94 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 1. Shakopee Public Utilities Commission Comments: a. There are some errors in the sizing of some existing watermains. b. Some of the watermains connecting this plat to the watermain on Eagle Creek Blvd. may be required to be actually in-place before water is available to this plat. c. There are some existing watermains which are characterized as needing to be replaced. d. Developer needs to secure permits from S.P.U.C. Response: a. The applicant will be required to identify the correct watermain sizes as part of the PUD and platting procedures. b. The applicant will be required to construct watermains in accordance with the standards and timing indicated by S.P.U.C. c. The applicant will need to ensure that the watermains are in sufficient condition to serve the proposed development until such time as they are scheduled to be replaced. d. The applicant will be required to secure all necessary permits from S.P.U.C. 2. Scott County Highway Department Comments: a. Utility and street construction involving CSAH 16 (Eagle Creek Blvd.) should be coordinated with the reconstruction of CSAH 16 scheduled for 1995. Response: a. The applicant will be required to do all underground construction work in the CSAH 16 right-of-way either before or during the CSAH 16 project and no open cuts will be allowed for a minimum of a 5 year period after completion of CSAH 16. 3. Minnesota Historical Society Comments: a. The probability of any historic or archaeological properties being present on this site is low. Response: a. No response is necessary. 4. Scott County Environmental Health Comments: a. If possible, it would be good to explore the possibility of an abandoned well on the Lenzmeier farmstead so that it could be properly sealed. b. The proximity to bedrock from the bottom of the NURP ponds is a concern and NURP ponds should be designed for minimal infiltration. c. Questioned the statement, "absorption of nutrients, heavy metals, and toxins by sediment particles shall reduce impacts to groundwater." d. If NURP ponds are to be excavated or blasted into the bedrock, the design specifications for the NURP ponds should be reviewed to ensure protection of the ground water. e. State laws require inclusion of recycling facilities in multi-unit dwellings. f. Suggested that the developer be required to propose methods to be incorporated into the development and surrounding areas to reduce noise levels. Response: a. The applicant will be required to identify and seal (if found) any abandoned wells to the satisfaction of the Minnesota Department of Health. b. This issue will be taken into account and addressed in the design review as part of the preliminary plat approval process. c. This issue will be taken into account and addressed in the design review as part of the preliminary plat approval process. d. This issue will be taken into account and addressed in the design review as part of the preliminary plat approval process. e. The applicant will be required to satisfy the State recycling laws. f. The City of Shakopee will suggest that the applicant consider proposing methods to be incorporated into the development to reduce noise levels in areas that violate MPCA standards. This City of Shakopee will not formally place additional requirements on this project since the excessive noise is largely generated off-site. 5. Metropolitan Council Comments: a. EIS not necessary. Response: a. No response is necessary. 6. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Comments: a. The Upper Valley Ditch can be enhanced as a travel corridor for wildlife by planting native vegetation and unmown grass to connect the remnant woods to the channel itself. b. Requested an opportunity to review the findings before a decision on the need for further environmental review is taken. c. The EAW should indicate how the proposed project could impact species listed in the correspondence from the DNR Natural Heritage Program, if found on site. Response: a. The City of Shakopee will consider this as part of its drainageway planning efforts, however, no additional requirements will be placed on the applicant. b. The City of Shakopee believes that there will be sufficient time for a review of the findings prior to any approval of subdivision plats and building permits and this should not delay a negative declaration on the EIS. c. Bill Bleckwenn of Pioneer Engineering has indicated that no evidence of the species identified on the DNR Natural Heritage Program was found on or near the Prairie Bend site and development of the area should not negatively impact any of these species. Exhibit C Review Agencies' Letters TO: Paul Bilotta , Senior Planner FROM: Lou Van Hout , Utilities Manager -� RE: Prairie Bend E.A.W. -' DATE: 4/14/94 A few days ago in phone conversation I mentioned to Lindberg that we didn ' t see any major items in the E.A.W. from a water supply standpoint , and he advised me that the intent of an E.A.W. was not to secure approvals of any water supply arrangements . With that in mind, I would like to respond to your memo even though the deadline for comment period has passed. A few minor items which did not affect the validity of the E.A.W. came to light . The following comments are to simply list those for the record, not as objections . - There are some errors in the sizing of some existing watermains . - Some of the watermains connecting this plat to the watermain on Eagle Creek Blvd. may be required to be actually in- place before water is available to this plat . - There are some existing watermains which are characterized as needing to be replaced, however we have no intention at this time to do so. - The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission is not listed as a separate agency from which permits need to be secured, this might be covered under the general heading of City of Shakopee which is alright as long as it does not mislead the developer into an oversight about the need for getting that approval . SCOTTSCOTT COUNTY BRADLEY J.LARSON I V.-----,..-44; -i ghway Engineer .` HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT DANIEL M.JOBE �' ' H} 600 COUNTRY TRAIL EAST Design Engineer ._ - JORDAN, MN 55352-9339 DON D.PAULSON (612) 496-8346 FAX (612) 496-8365 Construction Engineer April 28, 1994 Mr. Lindberg Ekola Planning Director City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Prairie Bend Residential Development EAW Dear Lindberg: • We have reviewed the above referenced EAW and offer these comments: ■ The proposed utility and street construction involving CSAH 16 (Eagle Creek Blvd.) should be coordinated with the reconstruction of CSAH 16 scheduled for 1995. Because of the anticipated difficulty in underground construction due to the shallow bedrock levels, all underground work within County right-of-way needs to be completed before or during the CSAH 16 project. No open cuts will be allowed for a minimum of a 5-year period after completion of CSAH 16. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this EAW. If you have any questions or would like additional information, please contact this office. Sincerely, fe.749"414166 . llos Bradley J. on, P.E. County Highway Engineer BJL/kmg An Equal Opportunity/A.`fi native Action Employer ...„.:_.„.. • „, ,..„ ,,,..., ..,.. „.. : ,„ 4. ,,,,:„ • M1NNE!':0T.a HISTORICAL. SOCIETY May 6, 1994 Mr. Lindberg S. Ekola City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Mr. Ekola: Re: Mixed-use residential development S5 & 6, T115, R22, Shakopee, Scott County SHPO Number: 94-1915 Thank you for providing this office a copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the above-referenced project. It has been reviewed pursuant to responsibilities given to the Minnesota Historical Society by the Minnesota Historic Sites Act and the Minnesota Field Archaeology Act and through the process outlined in Minnesota Rules 4410.1600. There are no properties in the project area that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places or included in our inventory. In the absence of reported properties, we have also evaluated the likelihood that unreported historic or archaeological properties may be present. Although we cannot state with certainty that there are no significant unreported historical or archaeological properties within the project area, we feel that the probabil- ity of such properties being present is low. Therefore, in our opinion, the "no" response to question 26a is appropriate. Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Sec- tion 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36CFR800, Pro- cedures of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation for the protection of historic properties. If this project is considered for federal assistance, it should be submitted to our office with reference to the assisting federal agency. Please contact Dennis Gimmestad at 612-296-5462 if you have any questions regarding our review of this project. Sincerely, CU-141AA-1—r • TC417tC4-4/1-' '• Britta L. Bloomberg � Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer BLB:dmb 345 KEEL("BGG BuU LF.‘ \F,D WEST �aI:sT Pal L.MII\NESOT.a .is': -1')06/TELEPHONE: 012-296-6E'; SCOTT COUNTY _" ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH • COURTHOUSE A102 428 S. Hoirnes St. _ _ . SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1393 (612) 496-8177 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 10, 1994 TO: Lindberg Ekola, Shakopee City Planner FROM: Allen Frechette, Env. Hlth. Mngr. SUBJECT: Comments on EAW for the Prairie Bend Residential Development Thank you for the opportunity to review this Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) . We would like to present the following comments for your consideration: 1. On page 7, Question # 13 . It was noted that the Lenzmeier farmstead may have an abandoned well located on it. If at all possible, it would be good to explore this more and if one is discovered, have it properly sealed. 2 . On page 11, Question # 20. It was stated that "Current site conditions allow for higher susceptibility to potential contamination of ground water due to frequent cultivation of shallow soils. " The cultivation alone, really is not the issue, the presence of potential contaminants is what presents the threat. Certainly, overuse of fertilizer or pesticide would present such a threat. Although there will be more impermeable surfaces after development, there will also be more potential contaminant sources. Since surface water runoff is to be directed into NURP ponds, the proximity to bedrock from the bottom of the ponds is a concern. No mention was made of the liner material, or permeability specifications. Surface water runoff from residential areas can have considerable pollution potential. NURP ponds should be designed for minimal infiltration. I also question the statement "adsorption of nutrients, heavy metals, and toxins by sediment particles shall reduce impacts to groundwater" . Clay particles can adsorb some contaminants, but that ability is limited in relation to the thin layer of clay that is likely in the ponds and the quantity of surface water that will need to be "treated" . NURP ponds are suitable for reducing suspended sediment, they are not otherwise considered a mechanism for "treating" or reducing contamination potential to ground water. Ar, Equal Oppk'.,niF.m.p(°- We also wondered if the NURP ponds would be excavated or blasted into the bedrock. If so, this presents a substantially greater threat to ground water, as both side wall and bottom infiltration could occur. The design specifications for the NURP ponds should be reviewed to ensure protection of the ground water. 3 . On page 12, Question # 21. We would like to note that current state laws require inclusion of recycling facilities in multi-unit dwellings. In some cases, this may need to be exterior facilities, including access roads for collection vehicles. The developer should be required to demonstrate a recyclable material collection plan to serve the multi-unit dwellings subject to review by the City's current solid waste contract hauler. 4. On pages 13 and 14, Question # 25. I suggest that the developer be required to propose methods to be incorporated into the development and surrounding areas to reduce noise levels. The fact that the levels already exceed standards does not justify allowing them to be made worse. Perhaps the increase is indeed imperceptible, however, further development in this area will also add incremental noise impacts which eventually may become intolerable to affected residents. This is an environmental impact that needs to be addressed constructively. C:\DOCU 1\WP94LET‘FXOLA Metropolitan Council Advocating regional economic, societal and environmental issues and solutions May 23, 1994 Lindberg S. Ekola, Planning Director City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379-1351 RE: Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Prairie Bend Residential Development Received by Council for Review: April 20, 1994 Metropolitan Council District 5 Dear Mr. Ekola: Council staff has reviewed this environmental assessment worksheet (EAW). The staff review finds that the EAW is complete and accurate with respect to regional concerns and raises no major issues of consistency with Council policies. An EIS is not necessary for regional purposes. This will conclude the Council's review of the EAW. No formal action on the EAW will be taken by the Council. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact James Uttley, Senior Planner, Office of Local Assistance at 291-6361. Sincerely, Charles Ballentl , anager Office of Local Assistance CB:jpu c: Sondra Simonson, Metropolitan Council District 5 Lynda Voge, Referrals Coordinator James Uttley, Office of Local Assistance la:\.-ko mppionl[rm l3CWV Mears Park Centre 230 Eazz: F::::-. `:reet S. Paul.M:: _rota 55101-1634 612 291.6359 Fa\291-6551 TDD 291-0904 An Ec'..;. Opportunity Empio3.e- ®-ecyc:eC Pace' STATt OF Crkn.ME OVA M DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 500 LAFAYETTE ROAD • ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA • 551 55.40 DNRINFO9>4 ION t612) 296.6151 Post•lt'brand fax transmittal memo 7671 ( May 25, 1994 Lindberg Ekola, Planning Director °UN��r, City of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Avenue MinagEEZIEFIxiv14 _ o .?- Shakopee, MN RE: Prairie Bend Residential Subdivision Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Dear Mr. Ekola: The Department of Natural Resources (DNR)has reviewed the EAW for the Prairie Bend Residential Subdivision project. We offer the following comments for your consideration. The EAW correctly notes in Item 1 la that the Upper Valley Ditch can serve as a travel corridor for wildlife. This potential use can be actively enhanced by planting native vegetation and using design features such as unmown grass strips to connect the remnant woods to the channel itself. We encourage this kind of action because increased use of vegetation onsite will not only provide wildlife habitat but can enhance water quality protection as well. Item lib correctly indicates that Loggerhead Shrikes, (Lanius ludovkianus), have been reported in the project area, a report confirmed by a site visit by Steve Kittleson with the DNR non-game program. The shrike nest appears to be located approximately 150 feet south of the proposed project site. The EAW states a reconnaissance of the property conducted during the EAW comment period would further determine potential nesting sites and results of this action could be included within the final review of the EAW. Being that this reconnaissance has been performed,we request an opportunity to review the findings before a decision on the need for further environmental review is taken. This additional information and the fact that there are only two known shrike nesting sites in Scott County, (one is the recent discovery), • present sufficient reason for additional review of this issue. The findings should address whether shrikes nest in the area, and if so, identify the nesting location and address potential impacts to the species from the proposed residential development. We wish to strongly compliment Pioneer Engineering staff in general, and Scott Krych in particular,fur their conscientious approach to this project. Once the newly discovered netting site is venfied,we would like to add the information to the Natural Heritage Information System. Please contact Jan Shaw Wolff with the DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program at (612) 296-8279 regarding shrike protection efforts. The correspondence attached in the EAW provided by the DNR Natural Heritage Program also referenced other reptile and fish species now listed as special concern species in Minnesota. The EAW should indicate how the proposed project could impact these species if found at the site. Soils onsite have a high erosion potential according to information supplied in Item 17. It will be important to employ an effective silt fence design during and after project construction and to maintain both soil and vegetative cover. Sodding and seeding should occur immediately after each stage of construction. • AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER f rlY-25-1gg4 17:48 612 2i-r6 6047 94% P.01 Lindberg Ekola May 25, 1994 Page 2 Item 18b indicates that sedimentation ponds will reduce post-development phosphorus inputs into the ditch by 40%. Given the project's proximity to the Minnesota River, (recently designated by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) as a priority target for pollution reduction),we encourage incorporation of measures designed to remove more phosphorus from runoff prior to its flow into the adjacent channel. Thank you for the opportunity to review this document. We request the opportunity to investigate further information collected about the project's.potential to impact the Loggerhead Shrikes in the area. We look forward to receiving your record of decision and responses to comments. Minnesota Rules part 4410.1700, subparts 4 & 5, requires you to send us your Record of Decision within five days of deciding this action. Please contact Don Buckhout of my staff, at (612) 296-8212, if you have questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Thomas W. Balcom, Supervisor Natural Resources Environmental Review Section Office of Planning c: Kathleen Wallace Steve Colvin Pete Otterson Jan Shaw Wolff t Steve Kittelson,Nongame Wildlife Specialist Lynn M. Lewis, USFWS Gregg Downing, EQB James W.Johnston, Sienna Corporation #940199-01 ER13.BEND.DOC ri1Y-25-1994 13:49 E:2 296 6347 9S'. P.02 PIONEER Civil Engineers • Land Planners • Land Surveyors • Landscape Architects * engineering Mr . Paul t3ilotta Senior Planner City of Shakopee 445 Holmes Avenue Shakopee, MN 16 May 1994 Dear Mr. Pilotta : As the planning consultant for the Sienna Corporation , Pioneer Engineering is submitting the following information during the comment period for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (SAW) for the Prairie Bend Project . Pioneer Engineering prepared the initial EAW "draft" that was submitted to the City of Shakopee . One in-flight sighting of the avian species L•a'i.ius Iudoviciarrls (commonly known as the loggerhead shrike) had been observed on the adjacent property to the south of the proposed Prairie Bend site by Scott :Krych, Pioneer Wildlife Biologist . The shrike oflisted tas a Minnesota Threatened species . Therefore, a nesting survey e Prairie Bend site and - adjacent properties ws perfermed to determine the presence of potential loggerhead shrike nest locations . No active loggerhead shrike nest sites were identified on the Prairie Bend property. On the P.A.C.T. Credit River property to the south of. the Prairie Bend property, one active loggerhead shrike nest was observed on 9 May 1994 . This nest was located approximately 150 feet south of the common property line between the Prairie Bend site and the P .A.C.T. site . The nesting survey was performed at this time which is the species ' known nesting period. Dispersal of the brood from the nest occurs by July or August . From information contained within the paper, Habitat Availability it btlit and Suitability for Loggerhead Shrikes in the Upper , by Bonnie L. Brooks and Stanley Temple of the University of Wisconsin , the decline in the shrike population does not appear to be resulting from a shortage of suitable breeding habitat , since the Preferred habitat is' common throughout. the Upper' Midwest . The author developed a habitat suitability :index L for shrikes .and cataloged numerous suitable locations' for shrike nesting . within southern and central Minnesota that were not populated by shrikes . It was suggested that other factors such as the doss of wintering habitat in the southern United States or environmental contamination may be factors in the decline in population . 2422 Enterprise Drive • Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 • (612) 681-1914 • Fax 681-9488 • 625 Highway 10 N.E. • Blaine, Minnesota 55434 • (612) 783-1882, • Fax 783-1883 I nggerhead shrike territories generally extend 1 /4 to 1 /2 mile from the nest site (brooks and Temple) . Preferred breeding habitat includes open grassland with scattered trees and brush that include species such as eastern red cedar (Jun i pears vi rain i ana) , wild plum ( Prunus americana) , and buckthorn ( Rhamnus cathart i cal . These particular tree species are thorny and provide places for the predatory shrike to store or cache its food supply by impaling prey on the thorns of these trees . The shrike has also been known to store food on barbed wire fences . This habitat may exist as pastures , abandoned old fields , fencerows , farmsteads , prairies , and young woodlots . Therefore, there is a significant amount of available habitat within Scott County and even within one-half mile of the subject property. Shrikes may relocate nest sites for no particular observable reason . The species , as stated above, may populate areas of human activity, such as farmyards and fencerows , as long as the nest itself is not directly invaded or disturbed by humans . According to Steve Kittelson, Nongame Wildlife Specialist with the Department of Natural Resources , shrikes are not necessarily perennial nesters and are known to frequently use new nesting sites within 1/4 to 1/2 mile of a former nest site . It should be noted that the vast majority of the Prairie Bend site does not contain preferred breeding habitat for the loggerhead shrike. The entire site has been actively cultivated except for a small brushy area in the southwest corner that extends into the adjacent parcels to the south. Since the site has been actively cropped through 1993 , grasslands with scattered small trees do not exist on the site with the exception of the above-mentioned corner . In summary, the Prairie Bend project does not directly impact existing breeding habitat for the loggerhead shrie nest was since nests were not observed on the subject property. One rved during the 1994 breeding season on an adjacent property to the south . Development of the Prairie Bend site would not directly impact this nest location. Please contact me or Scott Krych of Pioneer if any further information is needed. Sincerely, PIONEER ENGINEERING, P.A. 4/4A11*/ — William J. Bleckwenn Environmental Specialist 1JNK utiaiite section ILL :b12-2' (-4yb1 Jun 1J( 94 14 :SU No .U1U F' .U2 STATE OF - n DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 500 LAFAYETTE ROAD • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55155-4001 l ki DNR INFORMATION 412)296.6157 June 7, 1994 Paul Bilotta, Senior Planner City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379-1351 Re: Prairie Bend Residential Subdivision Dear Mr. Bilotta: Thank you for sending the DNR a copy of William Bleckwenn's letter containing additional information about Loggerhead Shrikes in the vicinity of the proposed Prairie Bend project. After reviewing his letter, we would like to offer several comments for your consideration in evaluating the potential environmental effects of the project. The DNR does not question Mr. Bleckwenn's statements about the location of the Loggerhead Shrike nest on property outside the boundaries of the proposed project. It is also true that some researchers have suggested that breeding habitat is not limiting for Loggerhead Shrikes, but we consider these conclusions speculative. Data from the USFWS Breeding Bird Surveys for the period 1966-1989 show a range-wide decline for Loggerhead Shrikes of about 5% per year. Our own monitoring routes,which have been surveyed over the last seven years, indicate a striking decline in most areas of the state. As Mr. 13leckwenn notes, some researchers have speculated about the cause of this decline, but the fact is, the cause has not been determined. We do know that in areas which appear to have ample "suitable" breeding habitat, pairs of shrikes choose to nest in some areas and not others. It is possible that factors undetected by us cause the shrikes to distinguish between areas that we perceive to be similar. In view of this, we do not think it is sufficient to suggest that factors to which shrikes are exposed during migration or on the wintering grounds may he contributing solely to their population decline. Nor do we agree that because other apparently suitable habitat is available in the vicinity, the shrikes could easily relocate successfully if precluded from this territory by the proposed development. In addition, although some pairs of shrikes appear to shift their nesting locations for no apparent reason, other localized areas in Washington and Dakota counties have been occupied by shrikes for over a decade. For all of these reasons, we fccl that one thing we can do to try to halt the decline of this species in the state is to maintain known nesting areas as long as shrikes arc using them. This is particularly important in Scott County, as we know of only one other confirmed nesting arca for this species in the County. Observations of breeding Loggerhead Shrikes in Dakota County by DNR staff show that areas utilized by this species usually contained areas of grass or pasture with scattered trees or shrubs, where nests were located. However, some territories contained substantial amounts of active cropland, including corn, soybeans, oats, and alfalfa (Kittleson, 1993, copy enclosed). Based on the AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Turl—i —1954 1-1: __ t: _9^ -_- co=. F.02 DNR Wildlife Section TEL :612-297-4961 Jun 07 94 14 : 30 No .010 P .03 • Paul Bifotta • June 6, 1994 Page 2 small amount of non-cropland in the vicinity of the nest site, it is likely that the pair of shrikes in the Prairie Bend project area utilize at least a portion of the cropland as a foraging area. Yoscf and Grubb (1994) indicate that loss of foraging habitat and hunting perches is likely contributing to population declines of Loggerhead Shrikes. Their hypothesis is supported by experiments in which they found a significant difference in territory size and reproductive success between pairs on territories where hunting perches were added, compared to control territories. It is our opinion that although the Prairie Bend project as proposed will not destroy the current nest site, it may alter the foraging opportunities for the birds, as well as introduce a level of disturbance to the area that the birds may not tolerate. For these reasons, our Metro Region Nongame Wildlife staff would like to meet with you and the project proposers to discuss in more detail the current layout of the proposed development. They would like to explore possible design features that would increase the likelihood that the site could continue to support Loggerhead Shrikes. These might include providing a buffer area between the nesting arca and the residences. Perhaps a portion of the 5-acre park referred to in the EAW could be allocated to providing low-use open space in this area. We have seen instances in Dakota County of shrikes nesting in proximity to farmsteads, but in these cases the actual nest site was screened from human activity by vegetation and/or out-buildings. In addition, we would like to discuss further with the proposers the statement in the EAW that the existing ditch might serve as a movement corridor for wildlife. There is a growing body of literature on the necessary characteristics of corridors and buffers in landscape planning which suggests that in order to be functional, from a wildlife perspective, corridors or buffers must he 50 or more feet wide, and must be vegetated with suitable cover plantings. Such a buffer along the ditch, especially on the south side of the property, could benefit shrikes as well as other wildlife. We also plan to contact the owners of the property on which the nest is located to discuss their future plans for that parcel. Obviously, their cooperation will also he important to the continued existence of Loggerhead Shrikes in this area. I have enclosed copies of the above mentioned references for your information. We look forward to working with you to develop a site plan that will be sensitive to the needs of this rare and unique component of Scott County's native wildlife. Please contact Joan Galli, Regional Nongame Wildlife Specialist, at 612/297-2277 to arrange a meeting at your convenience. Thank you for your interest in minimizing impacts on Minnesota's rare resources. Sincerely, Jan Shaw Wolff Endangered Species Environmental Review Specialist Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program 612/296-8279 enc c. William J. Bieckwenn, Thomas Balcom, Joan Galli, Steve Kittleson nhp940276-02 JLN-0?-19914:3= 612 2974961 F.1713 lV- C ONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner RE: Request for Extension of Time to Record the Final Plat for Dominion Hills 1st Addition with the Scott County Recorder's Office DATE: May 25, 1994 INTRODUCTION: The City has received a request from Gary and Dianna L. Bergquist to extend the 180 day time period for filing of a Final Plat after approval of the plat by the City Council. The City Code states that if a plat is not filed within 180 days after approval by the Council, the Council may rescind its approval. In December of 1992, the City Council granted a 180 day extension at the request of the applicant due to the wet weather conditions. The applicant is now requesting an extension of an additional 180 days in which to file the plat for Dominion Hills due to the death of one of the contract for deed holders. Additional time will be required in order to complete the paper work from the estate. BACKGROUND: On May 19, 1992, the City Council approved the Final Plat for Dominion Hills 1st Addition. City Code Section 12.03, Subd. 4.F states, "If the plat is not filed within 180 days after approval by the Council, the Council may rescind its approval and shall notify the Scott County Recorder / Register of Titles". The City Code does not list criteria for determining whether the time period for recording of a plat should or should not be extended. In the past, the City has made the determination on the basis of changes that have occurred relating to the plat which may necessitate the City reviewing the plat again. There are no changes being made to the final plat itself. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Offer and pass a motion extending the 180 day time period for recording of the Final Plat for Dominion Hills 1st Addition by an additional 180 days. 2. Offer and pass a motion extending the 180 day time period for recording of the Final Plat for Dominion Hills 1st Addition by a shorter period of time. 1 3. Offer and pass a motion denying the request to extend the 180 day time period for the developer to file the Final Plat for Dominion Hills 1st Addition and require the developer to resubmit the plat for approval by the City. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer a motion granting the developer of Dominion Hills 1st Addition an additional 180 days in which to file the Final Plat with the Scott County Recorder's Office, and move its approval. {TERRIE\CITYCOUN\TIM EXDOM.694} 2 EXHIBIT A 4080 Grainwood Cir N.E. Prior Lake, MN 55372 May 24, 1994 Mayor Laurent Members of the City Council City Hall 129 Holmes Street Shakopee, AN 55379 RE: Dominion Hills Plat Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: We are requesting approval for extension to file the final plat of Dominion Hills 1st Addition. The request is because of a death of one of the contract for deed holders. Additional time will be required to complete the paper work from the estate. Thank you for your understanding in this matter. Your truly, 41. ii• a L : CONSENT i,s, _ MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan DATE: June 1, 1994 INTRODUCTION: The draft Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan has been completed and submitted to City staff for review. Staff is seeking City Council direction on the procedures to follow for city Council approval. BACKGROUND: The Metropolitan Area Local Water Management Act requires all municipalities to have a Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan. The law allows Cities to prepare their own plans or adopt existing Water Management Organization (WMO) plans. The City of Shakopee currently belongs to four WMO's/Watershed Districts. Each one has prepared a Stormwater Management Plan for their drainage basin (509 Plans). These plans are also going to need to be completely updated to produce "second generation plans" to comply with the new rules and regulations. Based on the fact that the City belongs to four WMO's/Watershed Districts, the Council authorized staff to utilize Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Assoc. (OSM) to prepare a single, City-wide Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan that would meet the requirements of the new regulations and replace the four individual 509 Plans for the WMO/Watershed Districts. OSM has completed the draft of the City's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan and submitted it to staff for review. Staff would like City Council direction on the process the Council would like to utilize for review and approval of this document. The plan is actually an amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan. Prior to the Stormwater Plan being adopted, it must go through a review process by all Watershed Districts and WMO's, and adjacent Cities or Townships. The document is fairly extensive and staff would like some direction on whether or not the City Council would like to review this plan prior to submitting it to all agencies for comment or if Council would rather wait until all comments are received and then review it. It would probably be easier to review this plan in a Committee of the Whole setting in order to have in-depth discussions on the plan. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Direct staff to submit the Draft Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan to all agencies for review and comment, prior to City Council reviewing it. 2. Direct staff to schedule a Committee of the Whole meeting to review the plan prior to submittal to all agencies. (The Council should select a few dates for this). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. While the City Council will certainly have comments, the plan is fairly technical in nature and staff envisions that the various review agencies would have more technical comments than City Council. Due to the numerous C.O.T.W. meetings regarding the zoning code update, staff feels that it might be more beneficial to solicit agency input into the draft plan, prior to Council devoting a series of C.O.T.W. meetings to review it. It is the goal of staff to have this plan completely adopted by January 1, 1995. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to direct staff to submit the Draft Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan to all agencies for review and comment prior to City Council reviewing it. DEII/pmp STORMWATER Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota SEH Project No. SHAKO2056 July 8, 1994 S SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC . =SEN M ULTIDISCIPLINED. SINGLE SOURCE. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota SEH No. SHAKO2056.00 _ July 8, 1994 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Daniel R. Boxrud, .E. DATE: REG. NO: 12121 REVIEWED BY: / • / i DATE: 7 - S ` el `f' Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. -- 5909 Baker Road Suite 590 • Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 • (612) 931-9501 5909 BAKER ROAD,SUITE 590,MINNETONKA,MN 55345 612 931-9501 FAX 612 93 1-1 188 ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION September 13, 1994 RE: Shakopee, Minnesota Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SEH No.: SHAKO2056.00 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Shakopee do Mr. Lindberg S. Ekola, Planning Director 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee MN 55379 SEH is very pleased to present this Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. It is the culmination of much interaction between City staff, the City Council, Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, and other agencies. I want to thank the City Council and City staff for providing valuable input during the planning process. This allowed our work to proceed in spite of several significant issues arising which needed to be addressed as part of our work. Sincerely, at\ Ari Daniel R. Boxrud, P. . Project Manager ymb SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Si PAUL,MN Si CLOUD,MN CHIPPEWA FALLS,WI MADISON,WI TABLE OF CONTENTS — Certification Letter of Transmittal Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 — I. Introduction 3 II. Scope of Study 5 III. Growth Projections 8 — IV. Land Usage 12 V. Design Criteria 18 — VI. System Description 24 VII. Implementation Plan 25 List of Appendices Appendix A Developable Areas by Subdistrict and Future Land Use Appendix B Average Sanitary Sewer Flow by Subdistrict — Appendix C Design Flows — Appendix D Sanitary Sewer System Plan (insert to Comprehensive Plan) — Appendix E Ultimate Trunk Sanitary Sewer System (map) List of References of Current Related Documents Existing Sanitary Sewer System, dated March 1994, by SEH Inc. Feasibility Report on Lift Station and Forcemain to Serve Rahr Malting, dated August 12, 1992, by SEH Inc. for the City of Shakopee. • Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page i — Table of Contents, cont. Shakopee Lift Station Facility Plan, dated October, 1992, by Stachour & Associates for Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Feasibility Report for VIP Sanitary Sewer Interceptor Extension from County Road 79 to Jefferson Street, dated July 10, 1992, by the City of Shakopee. Comprehensive Plan, (draft) prepared by BRW and City of Shakopee staff, 1989. FMS/AC, electronic facilities management system prepared by SEH Inc., 1992. Update of 1982 Infiltration and Inflow Study (River District Trunk Sewer), dated December 6, 1993, revised May 18, 1994, by SEH Inc. Monitoring Report on Sanitary Sewage Flows from Shakopee Businesses, dated December 17, 1993, by SEH Inc. • • Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 — Shakopee, Minnesota Page ii - Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Executive Summary — The Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan for the City of Shakopee is based upon existing conditions, projections of future growth, and the practical development of a system serving the City's needs long into the future. In order to develop such a Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan, the following existing conditions needed to be documented: 1. The capacity of various components of the existing City and Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) sewage systems. — 2. Sewage generation rates,both general and from certain businesses. 3. The amount of developable land available,both inside and outside — of the Municipal Urban Service Area (MUSA). 4. The amount of infiltration and inflow (I/I) in the River District Trunk Sewer and its impact on City and MWCC systems. Design criteria needed to consider the following: 1. Future housing densities. 2. Employment projections and non-residential development density. 3. Sewage generation rates per acre for various land uses. — 4. Acceptable technical sewer system capacity criteria. The work performed for the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan required — close coordination with others, including: 1. The MWCC relative to their Lift Station L-16. SHAKO2056.00 Page 1 2. The MWCC relative to development of the Chaska Interceptor to serve Chaska and part of Chanhassen. 3. Rahr Malting and their expansion plans. 4. Adjoining communities and their development needs. The Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan efforts resulted in the following: 1. Development of an electronic facilities management system which can be used now and in the future for management of the sanitary sewer system. 2. An I/I study documenting that it is not cost effective to remove I/I from the River District Trunk(although it may become necessary for other reasons). 3. An ultimate trunk sanitary sewer system around which urban expansion can occur. 4. A sanitary sewer system plan which can be inserted into the Comprehensive Plan as one of its necessary components. In general, the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan identifies a means by which the City of Shakopee can continue its planned growth while not adversely affecting MWCC facilities or adjoining communities. Major recommendations and actions to be taken would include the following: 1. Complete the annexation of the Jackson Township property north of the TH101 Bypass in 1994. 2. Consider the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan and forward to the Metropolitan Council for approval. 3. After Metropolitan Council approval, adopt the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. 4. Complete the 360-acre land trade (identified in the cost-sharing agreement with the Metropolitan Council on the Chaska Interceptor). 5. Proceed with the implementation efforts necessary in 1994 and 1995 which consist of the following: a. Adopt a trunk sewer area charge policy and fund in 1994. b. Reconstruct the lower portion of the River District Trunk Sewer in 1995. c. Develop on-site system regulatory controls and training in 1995. d. Construct VIP diversion between Chaska Interceptor and VIP • Trunk in 1995. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 2 I. INTRODUCTION A. Authorization and Intent The Shakopee City Council authorized preparation of this Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan on August 20, 1991. Such authorization was followed by execution of a contract for engineering services which was dated October 15, 1991. The intent of the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan is to look at sewer issues and needs affecting the City over a long period of time. The Metropolitan Council in its "Water Resources Management Part 1" calls _ such a plan a local comprehensive sewer plan (Tier II). Shakopee's storm water flow is conveyed in a separate sewer system. Accordingly, only those items identified by the Metropolitan Council for a Tier II plan pertinent to a separate sanitary sewer system were addressed. A Tier II plan needs to address needs through 2010. This Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan addressed needs from 1990 through 2040 because sewers installed today should last 50 or more years before rehabilitation or replacement is necessary. A Tier I plan is less detailed and is called the sewer element in the local comprehensive plan. A Sanitary Sewer System Plan was developed to satisfy Tier I requirements in Shakopee's Comprehensive Plan. B. Study Area The area to be studied included all of the City of Shakopee along with certain areas within Jackson and Louisville townships which were anticipated to be annexed in the future. During the study, the service area was expanded westerly from Trunk Highway 169 to the Minnesota River. The entire service area is shown on the Ultimate Trunk Sanitary Sewer System map in Appendix E. C. Data Available Data available for preparation of the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan included the 1989 draft Comprehensive Plan prepared by BRW, with modifications by Shakopee city staff. Certain data in the draft Comprehensive Plan has been significantly revised through discussions between the Metropolitan Council and the City of Shakopee. In addition, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet and Comprehensive Plan Amendment for a proposed Rahr Malting process water treatment plant were available. Sanitary sewer system information available at the beginning of the study included construction record drawings, the 1974 Sanitary Sewer Capacity Report, a city base map in an electronic format, television reports from previous investigative work on the River District Trunk Sewer, and a System Improvement Study on the MWCC Lift Station L-16. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 3 — D. Format of this Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan The format of this Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan consists of descriptions of and references to various pertinent documents, a listing of Appendices to this plan, and a description of the study process used to perform the work. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 4 II. SCOPE OF STUDY A. Introduction Many issues were resolved during the study. The following identifies the work completed, not only as initially anticipated, but also what actually evolved during the study. B. Documentation of Existing Conditions The existing city base map was digitized and an automated sanitary sewer system map prepared. The physical data attributes of the existing sanitary sewer system were documented,including manhole rim and invert elevations; and pipe size, material, length, grade, and capacity. Information for those areas of the system installed prior to 1974 was taken from the 1974 Sanitary Sewer Capacity Report. Information for systems installed after 1974 was taken from record drawings. Pipe capacities were determined using a Manning "N" equal to .013. All of the foregoing is included in a separate document entitled "Existing Sanitary Sewer System." C. Field Check of Sewer Service Meters Private industrial sewer service metering was field checked for accuracy. Initially, four meters were to be checked, but eight were found to be in use and in need of field monitoring and verification. Seven of the metering locations were successfully monitored. An eighth user stopped providing data due to a malfunction in their equipment. Of these seven successfully monitored, there was good correlation between reported flows by these users and flows as checked during the study. The procedure and result of this work is identified in the "Monitoring Report on Sanitary Sewage Flows from Shakopee Businesses." D. Determination of Developable Land Developable land within each subdistrict in the study area was determined by land use. Developable land within this context includes all land which is or can be developed. Wetlands as identified on the National Wetlands Inventory and storm water storage ponds were deleted from these developable land measurements,as were major rights-of-way. Areas having high bedrock were not excluded from developable land, as much development within the City has occurred or is underway in areas of high bedrock. Developable areas, as measured by subdistrict and future land use, are listed in Appendix A. E. Projected Sewage Generation Sewage generation by subdistrict was calculated using the design criteria as described in Section V. The average daily sewage flows for each sanitary sewer subdistrict were then calculated, and are listed in Appendix B. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 5 — F. River District Infiltration and Inflow Infiltration and inflow (I/I) in the River District Trunk Sewer was monitored. Significant infiltration and inflow was observed during high river levels. This results in a potential peak capacity problem during certain periods of the year. However, because this only occurs when the river is high, the flow per year — which could be removed by rehabilitation methods would be limited, thereby decreasing the likelihood that rehabilitation would be cost effective. The procedures used and results obtained are identified in the "Update of 1982 Infiltration and Inflow Study." G. MWCC L-16 Facility Plan The MWCC is in the process of reviewing necessary improvements to their Lift Station L-16 and the forcemain conveying flow from L-16 to the Shakopee Interceptor,MWCC 7023. Work for the City of Shakopee has been — coordinated with work by the MWCC's consultant to arrive at a MWCC facility plan for L-16 which meets both the MWCC and City needs. This plan is entitled "Shakopee Lift Station Facility Plan." This facility plan is being reviewed in light of the effect of high river levels on 1/I into sewers tributary to L-16, as experienced in the summer of 1993. H. Rahr Malting Expansion When work on the study began, Rahr Malting was proposing, with City of Shakopee concurrence, to construct a treatment plant to treat their process water and dispose of the effluent in the Minnesota River. Due to agency requirements, Rahr Malting has not yet followed through with construction of a treatment plant. However, they are proceeding with construction of Malt House 5 which will increase their discharge of process water. The City of Shakopee,therefore,directed that this study assume that all of Rahr Malting's existing and future flows would be accommodated within the City of Shakopee and MWCC sewer systems in anticipation of Rahr Malting ultimately requiring such service. This requires the City to reroute as much of Rahr Malting's flow as possible away from MWCC L-16 and MWCC 7023. The "Feasibility Report on Lift Station and Forcemain to Serve Rahr Malting" identified the means by which Rahr's process water flow would be diverted southerly to the VIP trunk sewer system. The lift station and forcemain system would discharge to the VIP trunk sewer which was extended in 1993 and is described in the "Feasibility Report for VIP Sanitary Sewer Interceptor Extension from County Road 79 to Jefferson Street." — I. Chaska Interceptor A feasibility study was virtually completed by SEH which considered in detail the sizing and routing of sanitary sewers necessary to serve properties along the T.H. 101 (Shakopee) Bypass from CSAH 17 easterly to the Prior Lake Interceptor. The feasibility of eliminating the existing and proposed lift • stations near the Canterbury Inn and receiving diverted flow generated from Rahr Malting and the VIP district was also considered. The City of Shakopee Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 — Shakopee, Minnesota Page 6 and the MWCC later agreed on the size, location, and cost sharing for a gravity Chaska Interceptor. Data contained in the draft feasibility study along with other data available and generated was used to consider other options the City had if an agreement was not worked out. The agreed upon project has been integrated into this plan. J. Ultimate Trunk Sanitary Sewer System In consideration of all of the foregoing, the most appropriate ultimate trunk sanitary sewer system plan for the City of Shakopee was developed and is shown on the map in Appendix E. Based on design criteria listed in Section V, flows from the ultimate areas were documented through each existing and potential trunk sewer main and are identified in Appendix C. All calculations and documentation are based on use of a facilities management system named FMS/AC. It is the platform used to perform the work and includes a database, planning package, and sanitary sewer system template. Sanitary sewer flow calculations were done in a Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet. Expansion to this facilities management package is possible in the future as the City's needs and abilities increase. K. Sanitary Sewer System Plan Discussion on how to implement this ultimate plan, including interim staging of construction and MUSA boundary expansions, is included in the Sanitary Sewer System Plan. It can be inserted into the Comprehensive Plan, and has been attached in Appendix D. It is a rewrite of Section 24 from the draft Comprehensive Plan. • Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 7 III. GROWTH PROJECTIONS A. Census Information The draft Comprehensive Plan identified prior population growth within Shakopee along with the Metropolitan Council projections which were current in 1989. During the course of work on the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan, new 1990 census information was received. B. Projected Growth The Metropolitan Council has generated new population projections for the City of Shakopee based on the 1990 census and recent trends. The City of Shakopee has formally concurred with these projections through 2020. These projections indicate a population growth rate which is greater than previously projected. A review of Tables 1 through 10 in the draft Comprehensive Plan reveals that most of those tables and some of the commentary now need revision. Tables 1 and 2 were revised by city staff as part of their current efforts to complete the Comprehensive Plan. • • Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAK02056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 8 TABLE 1 CITY AND COUNTY POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS 1990 Characteristic Shakopee Scott County Population 1990 11,739 57,846 1980 9,941 43,784 1970 6,876 32,423 Households 4,163 19,637 Average Persons/Household 2.82 2.99 Families 3,056 15,438 Married 82.53% 86.90% Female Head of Household 12.73% 9.08% Persons by Race White, % 97.50% 97.82% Non-White, % 2.50% 2.18% = Median Age 30.5 30.2 % Under 18 Years of Age 27.86% 31.12% 65 Years of Age or Over 8.82% 7.33% Median Household Income (1989) $37,783 $40,798 Median Family Income (1989) $42,062 $43,890 Median Non-Family Income (1989) $20,625 $22,429 Per Capita Income (1989) $15,018 $15,341 Income Below Poverty Level (1989) Families, % 4.50% 3.30% Persons, % 5.10% 4.10% Education (Age 25 and Over) High School Graduation, % 81.60% 84.80% 4+ Years of College, % 12.00% 17.25% Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 9 TABLE 2 POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLDS 1970 1980 1990 Shakopee Population 6,876 9,941 11,739 Shakopee Households 2,068 3,226 4,163 Scott County Population 32,423 43,784 57,846 Shakopee Persons/Household 3.32 3.08 2.82 Shakopee % of County Population 21.21% 22.70% 20.29% Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 10 Table 3 shows the Forecast of Population and Households as projected by the Metropolitan Council through 2020, along with "softer" projections for 2030 and 2040. Table 4 is a similar Forecast of Employment. The projections are _ used to estimate land which would need to become urbanized in order to accommodate the growth. TABLE 3 FORECAST OF POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLDS 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030(1) 2040(" Population 11,739 16,800 22,100 29,500 36,000 39,500 Households 4,163 6,150 8,650 12,300 14,900 16,400 Source: U.S. Census of Population, 1990; Twin Cities Metropolitan Council. (1) Preliminary unpublished data from Metropolitan Council. 6-08-94 TABLE 4 FORECAST OF EMPLOYMENT 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030(1) 2040(11 Employment 8,500 11,700 13,600 14,100 14,750 15,450 Source: U.S. Census of Population, 1990; Twin Cities Metropolitan Council. (" Preliminary unpublished data from Metropolitan Council. 6-08-94 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 11 IV. LAND USAGE A. Residential Based on a measurement of developed single family residential land compared to the number of single family connections the MWCC has documented for the City of Shakopee, the 1990 housing density was 2.82 units per gross acre. The draft Comprehensive Plan identifies future development at a rate of 2.5 units per gross acre. This is appropriate in that it is conservative in terms of the amount of land needed for residential growth. A similar exercise showed multiple family residential development should be projected at 5 units per gross acre. This information was used to revise Table 5 as shown. TABLE 5 ESTIMATE OF SEWERED RESIDENTIAL LAND NEEDS: 1990 - 2040 Acreage 1990(') 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 Totals = Population(2) 11,739 16,800 22,100 29,500 36,000 39,500 Households(2) 4,163 6,150 8,650 12,300 14,900 16,400 • Plus 5-Year Over Supply -- 994 1,250 1,825 1,300 750 Potential Households -- 7,144 9,900 14,125 16,200 17,150 Increase in Households in Period -- 2,981 2,756 4,225 2,075 950 • Additional Single Family Units (80%) 2,385 2,205 3,380 1,660 760 • Less Non-Sewered Single Family (3) 200 0 0 0 0 • Additional Sewered Single Family Units 2,185 2,205 3,380 1660 760 Additional Sewered Acreage at 2.5 d.uJac.(4) --- 874 882 1,352 664 304 4,076 Additional Multiple Family Units (20%) --- 596 551 845 415 190 Additional Sewered Acreage at 5.0 d.uJac.(4) --- 119 110 169 83 38 519 TOTAL ADDITIONAL SEWERED ACREAGE - 993 992 1,521 747 342 4,595 (1) Actual data per 1990 census. (2) From Table 3. (3) Metropolitan Council guidelines on rural densities govern. (4) Averages based on gross density. • Rev. 6-08-94 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 12 B. Non-Residential A discussion contained in the Sanitary Sewer System Plan (Appendix D) explains the rationale used to determine non-residential land usage rates. On average, due to Shakopee's ready availability of industrial land, development requiring a lot of land has been attracted to Shakopee, but these users create only about 5 jobs per acre. Accordingly, Table 6 is an Estimate of Non- - Residential Land Needs based on projected employment absorbing land at the rate of 5 jobs per acre. TABLE 6 ESTIMATE OF NON-RESIDENTIAL LAND NEEDS: 1990 - 2040 1990(1) 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 Employment(2) 8,500 11,700 13,600 14,100 14,750 15,450 Increase in Employment in — Period --- 3,200 1,900 500 650 700 Non-Residential Land Needed(3) --- 640 380 100 130 140 • Plus 5-Year Over Supply 320 190 50 65 70 Cumulative Non-Residential Land Needed(3) --- 960 1,210 1,170 1,315 1,460 (1) Actual data per 1990 census. (2) From Table 4. (3) Job density for commercial and industrial in Shakopee averages 5 jobs/acre. Rev. 6-08-94 C. Land Availability Metropolitan Council, SEH, and city staff carefully examined how much developable land was currently available within the current MUSA. This would include currently underdeveloped land. This information is contained in Table 7. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 13 TABLE 7 VACANT DEVELOPABLE LAND WITHIN CURRENT MUSA BY LAND USE AND LOCATION (ACRES)(11x2> Sewer Sub District BP C HC HDR I MDR P PU RT SFR Total WD-A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WD-B 0 0 4.1 0 12.8 9.4 0 0 0 4.4 30.7 WD-C 0 0 5.4 0 0 9.4 0 0 0 0 14.8 WD-E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.7 20.7 CD-B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.2 8.2 ED-A 0 10.0 0 8.4 47.2 0 0 0 0 0 65.6 ED-B 0 6.8 0 3.4 0 0.7 0 0 0 3.8 14.7 ED-C 0 0 0 15.7 0 0 0.7 0 0 3.2 19.6 ED-D 0 7.6 0 26.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.2 VP-A 0 0 0 0 102.3 0 0 0 0 0 102.3 VP-B 0 0 0 0 32.8 0 0 0 80.1 0 112.9 VP-C 0 0 31.2 32.7 0 0 7.5 0 107.8 0 179.2 VP-D 0 0 5.6 0 0 43.4 0 0 11.0 12.8 72.8 VP-E 0 36.0 0 0 0 18.6 9.8 0 0 32.0 96.4 VP-F 0 34.9 0 0 0 25.3 5.7 0 0 166.2 232.1 VP-G 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.8 0 0 157.9 162.7 - VP-H 0 32.3 0 19.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 51.4 SS-I 0 5.0 0 5.0 0 0 0 60.0`3 0 0 70.0 VP-I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90.0 0 90.0 VP-K 114.6 27.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 141.6 ID-A 64.7 0 1.9 0 29.0 0 0 0 0 0 95.6 ID-B 43.0 0 0 0 146.3 0 0 0 0 0 189.3 ID-C 5.0 5.1 0 0 51.0 0 0 0 74.0 0 135.1 ID-G 0 0 0 0 16.6 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 ID-H 33.4 0 0 0 11.0 0 0 0 0 0 44.4 El-A 0 0 0 0 39.8 0 0 0 0 0 39.8 El-B 0 0 6.7 0 263.6 0 0 0 0 0 270.3 TOTALS 260.7 164.7 54.9 110.9 752.4 106.8 28.5 60.0 362.9 409.2 2311.0 - (1) Includes local rights-of-way. (2)As of 1990. (3) New hospital location. Source: SEH Inc., 1994. Rev. 6-08-94 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 14 Table 8 indicates that no non-residential land needs to be added to the MUSA through the year 2040. An excess of 135 to 205 acres is still indicated at 2040. For ease of calculation,all 480 acres of commercial land available was assumed to be consumed at a uniform rate by 2040, with the remainder of the total demand being satisfied with industrial land. TABLE 8 EXPECTED NON-RESIDENTIAL LAND ABSORPTION (ACRES) 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 Commercial (C & HC & BP) Available in MUSA 480(1) 384 288 192 96 Commercial Needed(2) 96 96 96 96 96 Excess Commercial 384 288 192 96 0(3) Commercial to be Added to MUSA 0 0 0 0 0 Industrial (I & RT) Available in MUSA 1115(1) 571 287 283 249 Industrial Needed(2) 544 284 4 34 44 Excess Industrial 571 287 283 249 205(3) Industrial to be Added to MUSA 0 0 0 0 0 (1) From Table 7. (2) Total non-residential land needed from Table 6, excluding over supply. (3) Net 205 acres excess less 70-acre over supply desired per Table 6 yields 135 acres excess. Source: SEH Inc., 1994. Rev. 7-08-94 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 15 _ Table 9 indicates how much sewered land will be absorbed by residential development. Single family land needs to be added before 2000. Multiple family needs to be added before 2010. TABLE 9 EXPECTED SEWERED RESIDENTIAL LAND ABSORPTION (ACRES) 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 Total Single Family Available in MUSA(" 409 0 0 0 0 409 Single Family Needed(2) 874 882 1,352 664 304 4,076 Single Family to be Added to MUSA 465 882 1,352 664 304 3,667 Multiple Family Available in MUSA(1) 218 99 0 0 0 218 Multiple Family Needed(2) 119 110 169 83 38 519 Multiple Family to be Added to MUSA 0 11 169 83 38 301 (1) From Table 7. (2) From Table 5. Source: SEH Inc., 1994. Rev. 6-08-94 The Shakopee/Chaska Interceptor cost sharing agreement between the City of Shakopee and the Metropolitan Council/MWCC indicates that the City must submit a reconfigured 2000 MUSA incorporating a reduction of 180 acres industrial land but adding 360 acres residential land. The 180 acres industrial land reduction from that available within the MUSA is within the projected range of 135 to 205 acres excess projected for 2040 per Table 8. The addition of 360 acres single family residential does not fully satisfy the calculated need per Table 9 to add 465 acres to the MUSA by 2000. However, the 5-year over supply from Table 5 for the year 2000 (994 units) would occupy 398 acres at 2.5 units per acre. If the oversupply does not become necessary, this exchange will be adequate. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 16 _ Table 10 identifies that the land north of the bypass outside the MUSA (in Jackson Township) is not enough to satisfy the single family demand for the year 2000 nor the multiple family demand for 2010. TABLE 10 MUSA EXPANSIONS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE RESIDENTIAL DEMAND (ACRES) Total 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 Acres Single Family to be Added to MUSA(1) 465 882 1,352 664 304 3,667 Single Family to be Added to MUSA North of Bypass 183(2) 0 0 0 0 183 Single Family Needed South of Bypass 282 882 1,352 664 304 3,484 Multiple Family to be Added to MUSA(') 0 11 169 83 38 301 Multiple Family to be Added to MUSA North of Bypass 0 11(2) 2(2) 0 0 13 Multiple Family Needed South of Bypass 0 0 167 83 38 2S8 TOTAL ACRES ADDED 465 893 1,521 747 342 3,968 (1) From Table 9. (2) Included in proposed 1994 MUSA expansion. Source: SEH Inc., 1994. Rev. 7-08-94 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 17 V. DESIGN CRITERIA A. Sewage Generation Rates Based on residential equivalent connections reported to the MWCC and flows measured by the MWCC for the year 1990, the average flow for residential _ property is currently on the order of 950 gallons per acre per day. This includes the current mix of single family, medium density, and high density residential land already developed. During preparation of the Comprehensive _ Sanitary Sewer Plan, future sewage generation rates needed to be determined for each of the three housing types identified. The graph on page 19 identifies the average flow generation rate in gallons per acre per day for various residential housing densities as identified in other comprehensive planning documents. A review of this data resulted in future projected sewage generation rates of 800, 1900,and 2500 gallons per acre per day being chosen for the single family, medium density, and high density residential development planned for Shakopee. When considering the future mix of residential properties, the average sewage generation rate will still approximate the existing sewage generation rate of 950 gallons per acre per day. • Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 18 AVERAGE FLOW GENERATION RATE GALLONS/ACRE/DAY 4,000 f =low Gen-ration Ra e 12)274 lthiiltDdy 3,500 _ r 3,000 Averag: Residential Flew teneration Rate vs- Den.ity of Residen ial D-velqpmept 2,500 (2 00 C AD 'J5 /A)• 2,000 CI• I c.•n t 0 1,500 121 (800 GAD fi 'c1,1/A) Legend 1,000 ›- + Shakopee Comprehensive Plan, 1980 + >- Shakopee CSP, 1972 ;A A VIP Trunk Sewer Report, 1979 1 Prior Lake CSP, 1991 * Savage CSP, 1982 • 500 • Rosemount CSP, 1991 _r 0 Apple Valley CSP, 1990 0 Oakdale CSP, 1989 II X Rate Used for Shakopee Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan I I I I I I I 0 ;r 0 5 10 15 Density of Residential Development (Units/Acre) Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAK02056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 19 Existing commercial, industrial, and institutional properties are currently generating between 800 and 850 gallons per acre per day based on MWCC flow data and current developed land measurements. The graph on the next page,entitled "Average Flow Generation Rate for Commercial and Industrial Land Use," shows what other plans have identified as appropriate. A 1977 study of industrial discharges from the City of Shakopee indicated a rate of about 850 gallons per acre per day, which is very similar to current generation rates. However, much of Shakopee's non-residential development in the past was due to the availability of large tracts of land suitable for low intensity uses. Sewage generation rates per acre of non-residential land within the City of Shakopee will probably increase over time. Urban land abuts Shakopee on the east, southeast, and north. Population, household, and employment growth projected by the Metropolitan Council indicate that Shakopee will urbanize much more quickly than in the past. The land in Shakopee will become more desirable. For this reason, future non-residential development will likely be more compact or dense, causing sewage generation rates to be higher than the rates being currently experienced. In review of projections being used for other communities which are currently undergoing significant urbanization, it would appear that a higher sewage generation rate is appropriate for the future. Accordingly, commercial and industrial generation rates are being projected at 1500 gallons per acre per day, while planned business parks and racetrack related development are being projected at 1300 gallons per acre per day. Page 22 identifies all sewage generation rates used for calculation of flows for ultimate development in the City of Shakopee. Note that current non- urban zonings were assigned the single family residential flow generation rate. While existing properties may be generating less than the future rates being projected, it is felt that upon ultimate (saturated) development of the City of Shakopee, current developed areas will indeed redevelop to the point of generating these higher flow rates. Appendix B reflects computed flows based on all areas of the City generating sewage at these rates. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 20 AVERAGE FLOW GENERATION RATE (GAD) COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LAND USE 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2.500 3,000 Commercial Shakopee Comprehensive Plan,1980 Commercial Shakopee CSP,1972 ESTEfrA Commercial VIP Trunk Sewer Report,1979 r • Industrial Discharge Study,1977 (Shakopee VIP Trunk Report) Commercial Prior Lake CSP,1991 irStEr„Mr // Commercial Savage CSP,1982 r, 7 • Commercial Rosemount CSP,1991 Commercial Apple Valley CSP,1990 arss;"-• Commercial Oakdale CSP,1989 • •ff a3;,•;„;,;45,•-, , Commercial Rate used for Shakopee 774:' • t/ • AY Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan BUSineSS Pa &Race Vac 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAK02056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 21 SHAKOPEE COMPREHENSIVE SANITARY SEWER PLAN PROJECTED FLOW GENERATION RATES FOR ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT Current Ultimate Flow Zoning Generation Rate — 2010 Land Use Types (GAD) A Agricultural AG 800 — BP Business Park 1300 C Commercial 81, B2 1500 CBD Central Business District B3 1500 CH Church 500 Gravel Gravel Pit 800 HC Heavy Commercial B1 1500 HDR High-Density Residential R4 2500 I Industrial 11, 12 1500 Jackson Jackson & Louisville Township 800 — MDR Mid-Density Residential R3 1900 P Park 10 PU Public 1500 ROW Right-of-Way 0 RR Rural Residential R1 800 RT Race Track-Related RTD 1300 S School 1500 SFR Single Family Residential R2 800 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 22 B. Peaking Factors Peaking factors were applied to average flows to estimate peak flows. The peaking factors used for the calculations were those used by the MWCC. C. Application All of the sewage generation rates and peaking factors assume that infiltration and inflow is under control and within a reasonable range. Existing and proposed pipes were analyzed based on their ability to handle these flows while flowing no more than full. In certain instances, segments of existing sewer mains might be surcharged to a minor amount under —' ultimate development and peak flow conditions. Impacts of such surcharging were investigated and, in most cases, were deemed not to be a problem. The peak flows and any surcharging which may occur under ultimate development have been estimated on the Table in Appendix C. • Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 23 VI. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION The existing and proposed sanitary sewer system for the City of Shakopee is fully described in Appendix D, "Sanitary Sewer System Plan." No intermunicipal connections are proposed. However,future service to portions of Jackson and Louisville townships is planned. It is anticipated that prior to or concurrent with serving these properties, they would be annexed to the City of Shakopee. MUSA expansions identified on Figure 11 in Appendix D are proposals of where urbanization could occur by those various years. For example, expansion of development out to the year 2000 MUSA line is expected to occur by the year 2000. In accordance with Metropolitan Council policies, a five-year overage of land supply is included as calculated in the previous tables. Unreasonably restricting the ability to provide urban land, possibly due to an unwilling seller within the MUSA line, could cause an unnecessary demand for rural residential development on septic systems outside the MUSA line. _ Accordingly, the MUSA line should be adjusted immediately because the current land within the MUSA boundary is anticipated to be consumed by the year 1995 as demonstrated on Table 24a in Appendix D. Growth rates should be continually monitored to verify the exact timing and location of other MUSA line expansions. • Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 24 - VII. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN The implementation plan necessary to stage the various sanitary sewer system — improvements in order to match projected growth is fully identified in Appendix D, "Sanitary Sewer System Plan." Budget figures are included for various extensions needed to service the City. • Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SHAKO2056.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Page 25 Appendix A Developable Areas by Subdistrict and Future Land Use Appendix A shows the future land use areas (in acres) for each sanitary sewer subdistrict. Appendix A was developed by inputting several different layers of information into a Geographic Information System (GIS). The first layer of information which was input into the system was the City's 2010 Land Use — Map. The 2010 Land Use Map shows the land uses which are expected to occur within the City limits by the year 2010. Since the logical service area of the City's sanitary sewer system extends outside the City limits, a separate land use designation was given to this area. This land — use has been call "Jackson" and includes land in both Jackson and Louisville Townships. The next layer of information which was added to the system was the development constraints. — Development constraints include wetlands and existing and future storm water ponding areas. This data was obtained from the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Maps and the City's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for the Blue Lake and Mill Pond Watersheds. The existence of bedrock was not considered to be a development constraint for the purposes of Appendix A. Much of the existing collection system has been installed in bedrock which can be found within several feet of the surface in some areas of Shakopee. _ Finally, the sanitary sewer subdistrict map was added to the system. The layers listed above were then superimposed and processed within the GIS. The result was a tabulation of the land uses for each subdistrict. The land use areas were further classified as those with development constraints and those without development constraints. The purpose of Appendix A was to list the total land area of each subdistrict that would contribute sanitary sewer flows to the collection system. Accordingly, the land areas which were identified as having development constraints were not included in the table. Likewise, land uses such as "open space," which contribute little or no sewer flow to the system, were not included _ in the table. J (t(pp f0008 W.`4,, p8p8�8�yy ic�yy S;(8.(yy� 88.°2° `g ro-88o�R,u°'i,�8�y.8tpwq`t6,�81p6� 3`���8yy. 88628 e7 X 8 g Ng g 8 62 4<T4'"'4N§V in(78 q" Q NN •-.- N c).-N (h r 805888 8., 888,Q 8$88 mo 88888888N88:=8:8 2 O ai 00)O O N N <-^N . OiO .-o 000000000 00 ui P)6 — 6 p p pffi -p p p p p N p ¢-� f 0 888000 008 8�,7N 888 88888888888888888 666666 000 O.0 7 O O 6 O 00000000000000000 U 888888 888 8888 .888 88888888888888888 666666 000 6666 0000 O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 888888 888 8888 8888 8888888888888888 2 666666 000 0000 0000 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cc p(�pp�pp r (yp (��ypppppp pppppp pp pppp pp pp pppp '4288,-68 8 O V 2 8' 'vT 8 g N 8 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8.8 N 8 8 cW LU 0 a)0 d-- N--co g 400 0 000 0000000 0-0<00 O Q p p p p p p p p — SONi.0000 008 ..ma 888 88888888888888888 O.-0 0 0 0 000 0 to h 0 O N O 0 00000000000000000 Q_ 884.4.`-' 811 088 888 88888888888888888 66doa� ort roto<o a6o6 66666666666666666 — Ci_ - 88:2888 8‘7.,g; 8888 G:4-88 p p p p p p p p 00pp pp 0p 2 p pp cc oa 006 666 0660 0,066 000000000000000000 o p p-i p p p p p p p-p p p p pr p p pp o p pp ttpp Z 0 00880 00 8 00 08 0 880 8 a N N ON 03 OO�nll co a N"8 ' IL o 0 00000 000 0000 0 000 r,-;V§ 0(V'A C/) 0 U — Q.-. 0 Za 666666Z 88.8888 888 888 $888 88888888888888888 66666 8a0 0000 00 8000 60060o6006c80000 w Q W d Q Q 7 << p p p y w888888 818 8.8p 80 8(7p�Ag 88888888888888888 ¢ 000000 666 0 0 0 0 *,649 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 O x 8P.1. 888 888 8888 8888 8888888888888888 — U 000000 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 666.6 0 6 6 0 6 6 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 888888 888 8888 8888 88888888888888888 600006 060 0000 6000 00060000600000000 • Q cc 0 888888 888 8288 8888 88888888888888888 i 6V0000 000 0.-00 0000 . 00000000000000000 — 0 p p p 888888 888 8888 8888 88088888888888880 O 666666 000 N 0 0 0 0000 00000000000000000 a) 0 88.888 800 '886- 7888 88888888888888888 6n8000 0rnr 0000 guivico 00000000600000000 U 888888 888 8888 8888 88888888888888888 666666 666 0600 0006 00066066660060600 a m -- 888888 888 8888 8888 F" 88888888888888888 666666 000 0000 0000 - 00000000000000000 Q 1- 0 a r- _ 0 0) Z F Z U U co 0 30 • U_O Q Q E Q 0 CC F U N J N Z Z 0 U (L U 0 00( N QmUOwLL W QmU Z . . N Qrfl UO U <a)O0 W aC7x--YJMZOa0 W 000000 > 000 w 0000 Q 0000 'Q �i�14-1i�»�»��1,1, Du, 3 333333 Q ¢¢¢ 0 0000 w wwww J 7 NnN 7g- uO tDOtQtog ton88.aD. N0P.888828I n 88,ZN 7007 N N r r .- H p p p p p p p p p p y p p p p p p p p p p p p 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4.8 2 8 8 8 8 8 tp A N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ¢ oo00otN Ooogooa �o�c000 000g g0000 00000000 w N -K _ r 888888 888888888888 8888 888888 88888888 6666 0 0 O o 66 0 6666666 O O O O Q O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 888888 888888088888 88888.88881Q8 88i88888 6666 . . . . . 6666 . F 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000d N t0 N O O O O O O O O N O O O O O 88:2R182888888N4 88:2R18288888888888888 88888888888 88888888 . _ . . < O O O N m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 do 0 666 at�}Qa�� pp p- p p �(V p (tgy�p yypp��AA tpo�AA pp QVotog8 88,,368 48888 A52P 8884f2: 8 0�NtOWN70 • . . . O Q]7t700 n �O rnn7n^,O NCDO 60 NtD ONn W-O f7 co8 W O 67;6 O tV (V C] f0 f� Q — 888888 888888888888 88888888888 88888888 000000 o0000000000 00000000000 66o00000 a 88888 88888888.888 8848:888888 888.10888 6666 . . . . . 000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00000co 0000000..; oonoon70000 000�0000 a 888888 88888888.788 88888880888 88888888 • oil 000000 0000000^0000 060N:0u00o00 00000000 M z 88888 888888888'888 88888888888 88888888 O 000t000 00000000000 00000000000 00000000 to w Y CO 0 — 7 X° a Z 888888 888888888888 N2888888888 84888880 Zm 0 00000 OO OOOO o o o 000 coo N O o 000 0000 N ino toy OOO ui— w¢ w - 2 QIX D ¢ I- LL 888888 888888888q8 882.86888888 88888888 pc 000000 00000000U)Nt)0 OOc0 oi00o 000 00000000 0 x _ 888888 888888888888 8.81 8888888 X0888808 00 U 00 0 0 000000000000 oo�g6Ooo0000 -6000 0 02 0 x J 888888 88°'888088888 88888888888 888.88888 000000 0o/600,00600 00000000000 00000000 m O _ 888888 888888888888 88888888888 88888888 • = 000000 000000000000 00000000000 00000000 0 888888 888888888888 88888888888 8888.8888 O 000000 000000000000 00000000000 00000000 m 0 888888 8888808880A8 8882288A880 8g84m?°88 000000 000007 0 60 Nto0 00078 V O NOO N ONto uA nN 00 O -- t7 r 888888 8888824888$' 8888888888 2888888$ a 000000 000006Nooci oo� 0000000000.- 1270000 c2 m N F U ¢ 888888 88888 8.88P, 88888888888 88888888 (A 066 0 0 0 F tnV rn 0 0-0 0 0 o n 0 0 0 0 6666 000 0 0 0o 0 0 0 0 ¢ 0 0 to N 0 Q w 0 I— a. o _ O Y w tt ¢ w i- 2 a CO z CO 0 O UO 0< U J ¢Q co x ¢ Z 2 COx y fZ I- - _ (7 o) o- F . . . . „ F ¢m 0 0 w w o m_7 Y J ¢m U o w w o m_ Y 7 m(T) 0 > ? ¢mUowa02 (w 0 000000 O 00oi 0(nch 000ch 0fnfn(n(n > >>>>>>>>>>> 0 •00000000 (no m m(ntA(n(nm m (nm(nm(nm(n(n(nmtnco > »»»»»> • o l8 O 828S2g28& 8 l- R 888 88888888888 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 d 0 d o o o 1G LL .-- d) N 888 88888888888 lay 000 00o00000000 0) 888 88888888888 S. I- CC 000 00000000000 pp ((ppyy ppip Qp a 8 0 0 8 O V N Y 8 8 8 4.A O 8 cc cC ,8 o�cR ($ 88tnM848•4. 8c�ir8 N 3 0:1(0810 m o a ei N co 00 Old 4 O Q 888 88888888888 in — 0 0 0 0 0 0 d O O 0 0 0 0 0 4 a 888 888888oiti888 8 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 u)N O O O .— 0. 888 88888888888 m Q O O O 000000000d o 0 z 888 88888888888 y O O 0 00000000000 0 N < g7 — a^ 0 p p p p p p p p p 5- 5 100,(91,Of 88888800888 8 W o _ 1D g1V O 0 O O O O O O 0 O O 52 W 10 CL til CC O. < I U. 888 8.8.8.8.8.88.8.8.8.8 Q 000 00000000000 N I N 8"y 88888888888 8 O 000 0000000018 00 I. = 0 -J 888 80880888088 CD 0 0 0 00000000000 — Q oc Q O pp ppppppppppp m 8 8 8 0 0 0 8 8 0 8 8 8 8 8 P = .660 000d000000 6 0 888 88888888888 1 O O O O 00000000000 N co 0 888 88888888888 ^O, O 000 00000000000 4 — 888 88888888888 000 00000000000 r I- 0 — 83€28 ¢ $P:Si,g8.888. S F '-o•- ai •��(WEl0T000N m 0 Q N Q W N W CL 8 0 — J Q Q = 0) W 00(~ A y y 2 Z W Q = J — ma6- Q(Gt� 5 QmccWu.tBx_7Y I-- 0)0 < : WWW coyO)N(n(WpOmm00a) 0 Appendix B Average Sanitary Sewer Flow by Subdistrict The next step in the process of estimating future flows was to assign an ultimate flow generation rate to each land use. The land areas from Appendix A were multiplied by these flow generation _ rates to obtain average flows in MGD for each sanitary sewer subdistrict. A detailed discussion of flow generation rates is found elsewhere in the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. 0PO � v0IQONN00 I-00 .- N N cu t7c9NN 00O700tl — F I 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-O O O O O O O O O O 6 0 0 0 O O 0 6 0 0 6 0 6 6 0 0 0 i ; gs8og 888008 s888gggg8gg88eog¢ 0 ! O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 6 6 0 0 0 6 0 6 6 0._ _ i gogggg 888 go8g 8gsg $ggossgg8gg§§gg§g m ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 6 0 6 6 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 — gggm §. 8888 .ggg gsgggsgsgggggggg0 F¢ I 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O o 0 0 o O O O O 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 6 6 0 ! — ggggggggg ggg§ ggg§ gggggggggggggggg8 cc I 800000 000 0000 0000 00000000000000000 ¢ I 3 gggggg ggg §ggg §ggg ggggggggggooggggg — O i . i 8$8888 888 20os 8088 88888888888888888 — ai 600000 600 6000 6666 66666600000000066 I 888888 888 8888 8888 8§888888888888888 d i 666666 666 6660 6666 66666666666666666 _ i 808888 888 8888 osgg g888ggggggggggogg ¢ 1 O ! 6 0 0 6 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 8 8 6 66666666666666666 i zI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 N,3�N N O ti'i t�O"6 0 0 g — (off I O w N[ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O • co 1 a CO I 1 ! z . j o8gggg 888 Ng.88g 6888 $$88888$$$$84-$888 z__,- w 1 – I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O6 O O O O O O O O O O O W CL WCC E _ 888888 888 8888 8000 88888888888888888 — ! 1 000ggg 888 §ggg 8888 ggg§88$88§§88§88$ U ! 8 0 0 0 0 0 6 o 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 O 6 O 6 6 6 6 6 6 O 6 6 6 O 6 6 i w 888888 g g g §ggg 8888 g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g QI 666000 666 6666 6666 60666666666806006 cc O 1 — ii 888888 gg§ §ggg 8888 gg8ggg8gggggggggg _ ! 686060 660 6000 6666 06666668066666666 U I I i 888$88 888 $888 8888 g§8§g§ggg§g§gg§g8 • 1 0 0 0 0 06 0 06 0 66 6 6 6 6 0 06 6 6 6 6 0 06 o 6 06 0 0 0 0 U 1 ! Ip pi O N O t7 1�O O O O N gsaggg 800 iggo gsgs gggggggggg88gg§§§ U ! 800000 000 oOO6 6666 00660000066666000 _ i ! I g g g g g g 888 8888 8888 gggggggg8gg88ggg8 0. 1 000000 000 0000 0600 00000000000000000 ml I g g g g g g 888 8888 8888 §§8888888888888§§ Qj 800000 666 6666 6666 66666666066666660 i — 1U! i i ¢ . i � 1 I O ! I I I ! i i a 1 i ! FU I i E i 1 1- 1 i ¢ i i z ! r F-Z I U i U ! .1- i v i ! UOi ¢ i ¢ i ¢ ! 0 ¢P 11 co l 6 i I- 1 ~ ! F- 1 N O i i I i Q I N 1 z ! w Z i ¢ i o f N 1 _ m N I � j Q m U O W w w I Q m U Z 1 Q m U o " I Q m b 0 U j Q m o o w w Q 2-�Y J!z Q a Q w + 000000 > ! 000 w 0000 < j0000 ' HHF-HHF1-Vh,n-s-3F 'r- t�i�o 13 ! 333331 ¢ ! ¢¢¢ U I UUUU w wwww I »»� »---,-»r I0S pn QNiP r2 2 N82 NO 2,17,32 7, i(N 2CnO 1Z.' N 282 OJ N 2NNNM § Ji M C7 NI N N O VN 0 0•-.-O N a7 N O O .o CD O 7 O.-O a • N N N N I- I O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i cc 880880 §88g88228i 8 88800";28888 88888888 LL O O o 0 0 0 O O O O O o 0 o O o 0 0 o O o o O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 88888§ 000000000000 §§§§8§00000 0000000 GO l 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 888888 858888 p888 p 8888 8 80 8p88p O o O O O O O O o o O O O O O O O O O N N o O O O o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r ; 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 a n O n N n 0 O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O t7 CO 00>nn §§§§8o088ggg $888$888888 00888888 7 l7 N N N M S 6 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 a 3 §§§§§§ §o§§g§os§§§§ 00880080800 §§§§§§s§ — O cc ggsggg gsg0agsa"sggg gggg8gggggg 88888888 aD 600000 000000000600 00000666000 00000000 888888 88gsg8g888gg g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g a 600000 000000000000 00000000000 00000000 a 888888 888888838888 888 Ns.8a88888 88888888 0 O o O o6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 2888888 888888888888 88888888888 88888888 O W Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 I 00 m n I 5, j3 •qZ 888888 8888880888gg oggggggg88 0 <00000 W O J , _ 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 O O O O O O o 0 Q.111 ¢ I CI- i_ 7 W• LL ; 8§§888 §88008880088 88080880888 88888888 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x i — 888888 888888888888 00CIE8888888 $8888888 O i 6 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 6 O O o 6 0 O O O O O o O o x J i i §§8§88 §§ §§§ §§8§§ 88§§§§§§§§§ §§§§§§§§ ▪ i 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a . C7 1 -- 888888 888888888888 88888888888 88888888 S i O o O o o 6 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O i I of 8888§§ 888888§8§888 80§§§§§§888 88888888 co I 6 6 0 0 6 0 O o 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 6 O o 6 0 0 0 0 O 1 00 .n o�cn v� o naN w voce Nn 008888 88888080088 088066§eggs Egos;088 O . O O o 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 6 6 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 O §§§§§§ §§§§§ E§§§§E 8888888888^ i888888g a 600000 000000000000 00000000000 00000000 m ggsggg Nk�003O88883 008888§§gg8 8888§888 < ; 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ri 0 ; I 0I m r i p ; 0 i a � N 1 r l I O Cl ; 0 ; — i < i W I CL I i x ; d i c i I N ; O I i i N I a U ; w Q O I W I x r ¢ iai 3i rn r0i - m° i 1- i amUOWtLL 1- I a0UCWLLC72-,YJ a I am0owu 02_'�Y 0 i <000u,, '�S C2W p 333333 o I mdhmcnmtbmcnornoo I adaaadaaaaa z 160000000 a0 ! O I mm i0 to Eh WWCflQ 0000 (n0(n 5 >>>>>>>>>>> 7:0 1 O N N -N00000.100,- i6 R i I Z m N t[1 2 i N t0 O N O 0 O O N O 0 OO I Oj F- i 666 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O i - 00 i I ¢ : 888 25258$§882588$25 u- ; 000 00600600060 : i i i 1 I 888 888888§888§ 12 m 1 666 00000000000 ; 1 888 88888888888 : 0 ¢ 000 00000000000 i i i i I I i 000 MMt`N,-N,-t0N0>O i - I 888 888828817�.j ¢ i 666 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 i 7 1 I 000 00000000 i 3i 888 88888888888 ; 8 — O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¢ i i i 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 : 0 I 888 88888888888 : " D . .— 666 00000000000 ; a , I 888 8888888888818 ai 000 00000000000 — • ; ¢ i 888 00000008888io p ; 666 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; M ; i I ; E 1 888 888888888881 , 0 W ; O O O 66666666666 ; • cot 0 mo Di '41 Zo in i g 88888888888 ; - W LLW I - I 666 O O O O O O O O O O O i ac ¢ i cI>aLc gg8 888888888g888888888888 §§§§§§§§§<< LL i ¢ 1 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 01 666 000000000001 mi I 1 8 8 §§§§§§§§V11 '.1iv i O.O-O O 0 i 666 O O O O O O O O O O O i 2 1 I I — 1 i W . §§§ §§§§§§§§§§§ 1 , Qi 000 00000000000 ¢ ; i 01 i 8§8 888888888881 " m I 666 000000000001 0i I I — 1 888 888888888§8 m i Oa O 666666666661 ° O 1 I 1 I I 88s 88888888888 : 0 O i 666 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; i i I 888 88888888888 : 0 a666 00000000000 mi — I 552�552� 888 : m9o88025258R1 ; < I 000 ; 00000000060 ; Ii 1 I I i of 1 I 0'- I i i I- I 1 '5 I O 1 7 ¢ I W I o I I d I 2 I a 1 0 ! i ' i 1 m 1 ¢ I = 1 0 F I ¢ 1 m i LL Z •I 1 UpiDi Ni o ¢< iai Wi .Z ; Z ; . i J ~ • I Qm00 W W0M-',Y D W II Q . 0 O � W W W W W W W W W W W 0 W W Q< fn O i W i lL W W N i m(!)NNN(nW N m4)m H Appendix C Design Flows Appendix C shows estimated peak flows at ultimate development for each proposed trunk sewer. These trunk sewers are shown on the map entitled "Ultimate Trunk Sanitary Sewer System." Appendix C was developed by adding the flows listed in Appendix B, and peaking the resulting cumulative average flows in accordance with the MWCC's peak flow factors. Where flows were routed through existing trunk mains, the capacity of the existing mains was also listed on the table. In cases where the ultimate peak flow was projected to exceed the existing pipe capacity, the estimated surcharge above the top of the pipe was also shown. One assumption which was made to simplify the computations was the location of collection points for each sanitary sewer subdistrict. It was assumed that all flow from each subdistrict would enter the collection system at one point within the subdistrict. This collection point was represented on the map by a solid circle with a point number designation. Unless the topography of the subdistrict indicated an obvious natural collection point, the point was located roughly in the middle of the subdistrict. In reality, flows could be collected along the entire length of the trunk main within each subdistrict. This could cause pipe sizes to vary slightly from those shown on the map. Therefore, Appendix C and the map should be used with caution, and only as a guide to projected flows and pipe sizes. The only current intercommunity flow is in the Prior Lake Interceptor which transports Prior _ Lake's flow through Shakopee to the Blue Lake Wastewater Treatment Facility. The flow from point 18 to the north includes the projected ultimate flow from Prior Lake. Prior Lake's contribution is estimated to be an average flow of 9.16 CFS according to the 1991 Comprehensive Sewer Report for the City of Prior Lake. In Appendix C, all peak flows were obtained using the appropriate peak flow factors except for Rahr Malting's pumped process flow which was assumed to be constant at 1200 gallons per minute, or a rate of 1.7 MGD. Where Rahr's pumped process flow constituted all or a portion of the flow in any reach, only the remainder of the flow was peaked using the peak flow factors. The reaches which include Rahr Malting are highlighted in Appendix C to indicate that the peak flow factor applies only to that portion of the total average flow which does not include Rahr Malting. In addition, Rahr's discharges impact the City's River District Trunk Sewer. An operating plan agreed to by the City of Shakopee provides that Rahr shall pump flow southerly at any time their process water holding tank is high enough for their pumps to operate. To avoid overtopping the holding tank, discharges to the tank need to be properly timed, and off-peak gravity discharges will be made from the tank to the River District Trunk Sewer. Therefore, the peak flows identified for the River District Trunk Sewer downstream of point 68 may at times be constant • flows. W W a WMWE §§§§§ § §§§§§§i §§§M§ ( 62°Ei 66666 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O _m 0 1 0 r ' 00000 O W W tOtOOW t9?N OO7t2rN8 mO�N Rg Zw-� FaaLL 00000 äo - o' G(V N N�f.: m a a 0 R a i Lu 0 I I Y3 .-MONf. ON0NWV,ONNv MDN.-N NNI nnyy .-NUJmWR <rNO� NMM NNNW stON a0LL ! c46--(15 O.:OjNN X00 N vi 00.-.-NMaD aLLVi N N W N N <N W.-.-M N M oo O N M M O� ..- vMNv.- N WNOMtOM MO O$NR N YSI v v.-NN OI�N t�h o0 d W M MNIs O f�N M <00 .-N,-..-V. � -000.-m OOOO-NN w_ia LL t 1 1 00000 NM0000000 0 $O O mt0OV.Uv.- 88RrO O pp __ °Q3p 1 66666 4666664666 OM M M MM N 03 w9c~ ' 03 aLL ? LL O NI�N((�1LII,, 0 . ) U) Np §Mao � rMpOO4N1OMON.-Nr�ZZ Qp1 ^ [ 00 r-LL0i 0 0 0 O.- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 a m 0 0 i Q G v I �0 1 amco,, O NNOO NO t2O pN"NNOO 00001 O0000 000000000o 0000dOo — ¢ 1 i I-0 i 1 1 00 (• W i I J-O 11 0 m m o o m<o D 0 0 m Q 1 H H H F- d ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W 0 0 wmalw ,,�, X333 ¢0000¢ w^^ww 1 ¢moi ! m I I-¢ I ¢ 1 (ow O21 D i 00000 Eil¢H i OnF.F-WOO 00000 WZ i tilOWvtOLnu�icoi 1 ¢ I 0 6 1 ¢ I HZ Ym a ! w� 1 DU ! — F1 (0^ 1 0F ! 1-¢ 1 -Z i Z v i i-:1- ! F 1-01 • O . LL 1 0 - i EE C ! 0N I ! Z 6 ! n N ,m M N O 1� N H • ,,,.. , --0.,D N o D Om { Y` I ryw 7'31 W Z ! 'Q I FNM vN i¢ ! 01,-MM0 FNM v N W , 01,-0000.-0.1 N W W a _ WV>LL §§§fi = .° a00co 6666 �` E4. .-o p; 0000000000000'-' MI !p I• >l�y i7 ' _y.. nt • §.§§ ->' tf Via$ $: ��:: ` . z W ci N` r?4t�?S �aQLL 6666 D,- o t�l:ao�i�^Mico^.r • o W4'6t / a` IO N r rs a �• m 0-'a N N ID M m� N N40 a O LL 0 0 0 0 • � N 6 6 O(0 6 0 0 0' 6 o mx (2_,_, Y W Y.� Yl 33 I E N N f % A194. n m g Q IRI m m h N N�"o aO0 i 0000 n�n� O• JAS` NN1�O0-D000mOI`&�O O a _ ¢ I 0000 .414 -=',74 • OO OOg 80082248 8Y. O O N h V3O Vfff �y •y,. :b.,y�{" MoMNf N<fl7NNbf fAw''. co 1.1.1_171 ms's;;.NY•.•.r,7;, • `Su •,ie e 3 au_6 1 :, :*(1 Y r UO LLrC A • X-.1 3 ! CI pW tD co a- };e4 -h; 0W pM 8 as�D O l9 1t��N Of pN IA. �IyO(ly9 . .. ZZ -,<06`i O O O O. '> .•, ,,• -� • t�f0 0-D t0 NO Nc�O,, 8 O'rO O ••�. - W CC HLL(•} 1 66 C6 n� ♦0- 'O OOON 607000 CM coda0 VP �;c� Q Q ; i 's ., .Fvy`.% f7�- �'�i4 ."4 Q , • CD 5�m C�: 't";. - CDN 1�88 IO1�I Yl CCi�N 8 8(0 �0 0 +:la` 3Wo 1 82500 m ' t0N000t0000000 .00 -- Ooo i 6,666 1. 0 66666666666 .00 -. — LLo 1 RAW!• X0' X`rr Q ,- m¢UWI nLLWOQZO1 Li-W° 1- I U m Q 'U LL W m a a Dol odppoit1 0-0-0- n•z ; 0-0-0- 0-p060 0 0 UaX0,>, »> Ug »> >--- E- t 1 o ! ¢a ! WF I 1 I-Z 1 I- i Zi t0 ?WS ! p )-� I ?¢ - W N NN N In V V V 0000 W 1 f OtONN NOO N N,CD<IDN� . • Y W ! O W ! _ I Q p 1 YM Q W ! LL ! N ! :E :Ei - I t OZ ! 0 i z • LLog I W I- ! ep aa�m,I (Ny p Cp �p a W ! p pp��pppp �Cpp m ; Z= i 1 5 N t IWON W Ill V VOV V Zm I V f Cl9NN NN N N W V mN i W I Z 1 ¢= I — Q0 , � i ISI 0-U 1 0t[1mn 0 W O-N M 0- f U ! OD �CDOI IO.-NM f of conoJCDp Qz I >- 1t0N NNNNNNcOOONOO 71..• I OO tOtOff f f f f ff f 01(!t-0 W W a XUmOOEi 666666666666666666666666S666'6ptlDO*00060000000 paUCL 000000000000000000000000 600 00000060 UoQU 1 xh%�% : X < i 6',--?s : w 0 I f Nmnf oo mmn0)N^m f mm 6C1 p `' On W mmf W N Y (..7..) 1 6mmw g f NOf Nf�O it m00m00 aD'''ts,0„.,,,,0 m f t76N m•-tp C)m n h n C) r N f N m N f N. C)v ;N_ ...N m m Qo N N m QOW i NC)m Oi.-f mn0)YI.-C)'O y-6 CD CD Y-fVO AulO-Or. CI-Y)IOn.-CIO 1 <v <NOg h MNN�mmNWN .O.-0NmpOM vn Yp N .-CmnONNQI °0z4NN. v0mmOm00C .-'-vmm6an6-6mnf6- V7NmaOnme.- .-m 7.00 .-NNNNfYYO. 660CN^O6.-.-N46i'*.RtACCOOO ? NOCfNOmm ! 1,4W -..aLL2 y✓TRI 200000000000000OO860�0600 o' g00n0 00000600 UQOO i C)C)NNC)C)C)NNNt7C)C)C)C)(VNf NC)C)C)NN- '�'`y)+ . f C)t2`1' 66666666 Lii ta iX0tp vnN 44� , LL1 S J i n NoNOOm.o.ov onnvNNmmNp ppm t CDNNCO ?O N pa JOpppO^mN0&C �mm n) SnINOOf Y> mRmiFG'n Z2 Q I Nm f` 0.-•Y-•.•ON• • WO HaOI OO ni 6OO•--NfG000 NN O N OOOmm > OOOt. 0 ^ w ,Kfa w - Qp Q I 5Naj . - 3 p i n v88m N CO O W CO f YN C)8O n'524,2 mnO ot'_-21 8NN 0m i N n ON n N mrNp 66 omO7Nm yyNN)O Cv-ep666 NO QImR N ^n wo1 000 i 600000000000000000000000 ,,,g, . r0oQ O i 60000000 1-0 ; aa1- i aVwi YMLLWOOM QYQ -xwpx 0 > > . QOmQwOm< � ai 000O g i Ma�, ,» 0, m> 0 NN >NYicoiaoia0� to E 1 1 _,1 1 7 0 1 l i 1 O I Ro OOOaolmnmm.-mvNNCOmmvmNv W mm�maaCl Q NN.-Ommnm , 1 Y i m comma)mmmmmmmnnnnnom��co6Mc�c96� a 1 mmmmmmm� i D 1 O 1 I 1 i- 1 H wi Y 1 1 W I ? i :E I-- 1 QO : 0 1 i- 1 WO- . I ~ i •MI M I 6'oogR�^mmFm `�dmm$mn°�nano.1- 6` 6Xi`�66 3 , C0CD 'CD CO c0 =WI 21 mi — Um F 1- i Q j wo O I Nt'O NmnCaO_Nc7vCm nma O_NC)fNmnm O7,Nc7 S122.'3228;8 z (/) i N N N N N N N m m m m m m m O D m n n n n n n n n n n m m m m m W W 1-0 a 0WwEM§§§§80§ - § §§§§§ =X00E1 666666666606 60666 _m O0 i 8888pp888888 188:0: 88888 Z W (n I .r�§§§§0 0 N N N �O 0 0 0 0 0 r d Q w . N N O O O O O O N O O',C 0 66666 Nadu i c99 1199//O0 X Q v I W U 1 N .514- oop W t9 Nab N. nor,..-,.. I t0 O o n N O 10 10 o R;M'>N. 0M1.-0111 Ne c—I NuOIOONN m 19 10.1q;c0 ocomm o W UU I ::; ;::::: : :::: 5 30 1 ancon Ncc7O?m ersiv clapcm 1-r O--O.m Qim"f'oc4, 0. O(' 228828,122244 000$0van occ °<0° i N N Y 19 M Q 19 N N N Yw v r, v 19 19 v 19 U3 Mc 0 15 o-X 0nmm-.-nmv:eY N m 0 O N W 0W48 ;828n4t.9822. 8 ZZ QO1 WoF-w0i 10 6 0 0 0OOm66,4 6666 <Q p<�I kF 881O1ppprpy� im�ppc�pp�<pppOp(0(y1N.;'�, 8'48::,% N�W1WOm W 0 1 O O O N O O O O N.-p; O v O 1NO 000 i0 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 O;QZC 66666 u.Q 1 1-0 1 t W j O=0 W W U 0< << -,U Y m 7 W O 1 00 W W W W W W 0 W W=w= (0-0 . 00(1)000) 1!)N W- N N W N W O I I I- I i O? Q I r O N O m W N v 0,-,-0 i - I O i NN i 0 v 0 0 N Di I W i W U F- I ! CC J 1 M F- i W < ! U.- I Z Q I . lit WN Q W nN1yOm0U100N.- E i 1010vn19 =W i J ' N NV z 1 — OM 1 Q F- 1 Op z i a i mmmmm.S � � co W . o Q 19 v v,10 1 goo$ L, ¢ Appendix D Sanitary Sewer System Plan rn a) a O a '4-,) O as o .--, a) ° — W" y a 0 1 Hyo 8 0 O Uo D ° -- o 'b *: n, ac as oa '° 0 a) E 0, a.C — U aw C •� o '� �? �, 3 0 0 0 °) °)CLI CI 4-. .o .0 U 4-4 1-1+r4 ,o 4 ° o •° o 0 .r ° a O o w �+ fUy aI.) tv) a 0 � = a$ �+ co •o 0 0 V o b - ccs N 0 O ' U fl cC = ›, ° o o y o � O E° .4 — 0U to 0 a\ 3 + O pb o 0 y po U w '70., ON 4. 4 ..^ 8 a CL) 0 ° .a) +-. w g ci �n w ° 4a. o Z. ° 0 ° ° 8 ° ° o 0 0 O O 4- o j a. o o 4) 0 'C a3i U cQ�� ,8 N a. E E 5 az °i •� 0 ,.. CI 174 144 °' " 0 Cr° � >° > 3 = o ooo °, xo 0 4. C •� :c ' y4W ° a w ° :c ao :a p y c o a, N — i E--, d c� CA 0 CI CA U C� U . 0 � .aao " c ° 'E •- n+>, o ' b o ° cz ° ai .- oo � as v) E— V) o cA > o p Clat0 o o • 48 - C 0 c.) ., o o a > 5y oa o2p a .0 `nO U U o LW) .. «S c . p a 1.4 oF° ° F 'cnc6,vCra" a) 'b ; Qq U � M ., U 0 >, O •.. . b= c4 . � bq U O� N C c 0 0 co a5 'U U_ ai :_ aba avi 4-4 E .b . L ° b 'do C 1 — yv-, 0 U • 0 ' „c1 >_ O al O O w .= .0 .1.7:, •0 - y .,0 .48 X 0\ OO OUyO 1, O K 0 da •Fj : w y p0: *.p = N C C O >, cA w ' a a -CCI V ° oli o ... �o . ° tix0 ^' w� U 2 ay) 0 a '.. ° yaci 0 V C aai ° U6E 0.) c U •a Caw C c 3 � wamCI) ci) _ a° ° ) CU Ea° ya by Ubo a O " wOOrQN � aa� ° A O aE ° V ' 0y ° a > = y 'b O •- •C -4-4 U p .0y ~Ui, ° s ;; •sU N csU vN xa, — � O � 0 Cl) vi c , bU C O V . CA4-' y 'C y ° . GE4, U b0� 5 y0 .y 'C U ' E + ON U U.- O + •• t " 71. w . Q O 2 � . a) 4.4 .bC 'O g o � . o ,.+ - 0w p, _. . • 0 CA 0 c� y0 . 0U U cO ` 1. b = O t c 2 to N a e O o a) .� Ca.in, ' ca '- ° �5ao .E ° > EA— ° anH yo a) .� C , O . O T _ 3 E E I, b U 'C , x30E O y .. -0 ... , , N y •.. oU 0O csf A cnOb4asw, >, g >, >, . � •. 3c.; 0.,v) •C -00 ›, a) 4 o 3 cz an •V Rf y ° ° 3 O y C) ,.., .p O w •.r z, G) U U (...4_ m a) 0 wEMO �C 0 .E ' d ° 3y •� 3 ¢ t3 =�y � 6US .E ° �s � -cci z a .) 0 = w . � a) ° CEa) vo ° a ° a) cCS - c. ,.. te 5 cc t ., cn o , 0 Ai, aa) 2, � tzoc3 CI. 3 ;� 00 csb U U 3 ° ` E ` - . b aS 'E ` ca = at ° Va) 0 > 14s~ CA ° ° U ,.; Cl) y, > a) -6 ° rcE 4y ° r = % C4 -o 0 f:14 o0 3 '4) u) I) C >. I U a) ^ : ) ° = Eo ca c U 0 oy aboa a «, cz w bq.1 • a) >' O ° U a) > o wo aoboN1 ° g •C ° 4.0 O y w '' . ,� w O C >,••., CA.1 •5, y - Lc° ) 'p aC? o � ... y o o = 'c. . Uy ° .., „o . •., .c c 0 o . 8 >, a ° °aw3a y � � g — ii o O E 0 VQO cti _ - w � aN , • • - n - ,0 Q ' E3 , y a ' 1 e > V a) y ° " •-• 4 .(1) .—i 3 a C E ° cu " " •.+o 0° E .0 ,), cV ) co = = ) . a - b' ab_ 3 $ N ° y a - w a) ) Cate, . al ; yO •a � 'C- o ' .E U cdw •g ° ° 1O gU a m ) E0 .50 ` o .8 U N — ) _ 0 'a 0 OOg. = cr -v N ,— - 5 0 CQ 04 ■ I . ■ ■ cS .fl U "C CI) Cl) Cl) V) CI) U) Cl) C/) Cl) ba '1C1 sej5 1.4 UI C6 ap >, .. � � a) g3 a)jj 0 o _ -fl ate) 4 'o a) a) V - cA v 0 0 o U a > Q o 1.) E r — 67 ` 'c � � � g0 0 -1 oc0O • 0, °' �,', a) ° U 3 E g '-ao bey cd �,40 p, a) = •v = 4-4 w a) 4 ar 3E 3 wa �"CS "C3 oA, ;)o � � N o tOi � "10 )UOd0 am ' 0' 'b I. 7:, —3= a.•p > a p .r-, .r c ' o �0w30. go) V) ° � E i~ 04 0 • t- a)a) .o > as 7:3 an w t CC cl ... = a) a) O i-+ U aS O cf, hn vC . a 0 pp E O C •,:t, "i � ci, o tia c°, + o .,� � °' �, OUE � � U te > O) E b ...E U C ob. y 0 _ . + °c > xo .= , yga a � • v Up >,•., — o > •; ;� � o 3 0~ a) 'o 0 0 U) Ems „c3 VD � a .� 30 a) E E � 00�'. ao '� ,� E .� ° a, 0 c -° oQ � -d op '3 a ° .0 �, 8 E g 0 a) r. >, 0 .fl ca, � E :V o 4.. a) ° a .r 3E a CU w at , v4. c CI o a " vomp '�) cd V, O ) v, U E wE '0) .r - Na w14 u. ° 0 0 M O 0 .ON E � .� a.� 3 o � E �' a" tea, c = U) 0 atia) a) UE = E ° = v) a) ° a) E a) .o to a .Z•5 , v) 0 H ca >, .L7 0 O k 0. •0 ,O a O U (6 w ,.; v ti w (4 • ta ,14 t) b O E"' ..5., p p O a .° O .., _ 9 v3 °� " g � � a O' E °) � � — tut) R3 08•v � p • .� 4+ O O E c ,.. �3U ° • aO" O o a a) . b° •F, 3v S w" "° wo „si o C7E n. • • EoF � E0. opo . � 3 G0o ? a) maca, 3 . a � 0 i bE 03t, N ° , 3a, ) -dca. OOp o � . �•� a o f W 0 'v O i� 0 o :E 3 a = �' 'C ip" � � ° ° a) ''has ao E g bv0 U .0 C �' �+ ai a)nate) p ° F 2 Vis, a) p `� v, a) CA � � > = .� � >+ co) .ca .E •.oa10 a,- — o o a.> ,7. �. o U i ami 0 ao) a) a p 0. o coi o Q 8 Z r H w � w ti c� COI C.)) I I CA ■ I ■ . ■ ■ Q) W1 N M C,) V) V) C/) V) V) V) (/) - V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) � 3i ; Uaa > •f �or� Ec > 4,1 ' aoc a .a > vCc002-6) C) ° .= 'b c. 3 v .E 3O �D o � ° 'Cl cd ai � p •., c� go . 0 0 0 as .c O .= a � � 0 >, .0 � oOcA ._.. a Cl v: ao oao ; w � c,, � a0 ( 3 0 '8 -) CI) 0 .0 A .° 00 = •= g 3t0 ,� ... � .0 > .0v ... = 0 3O .aO 0 -a i 'G4w > 0v° � a ,• OUB 0. 03 ... �� � �•� • a - � 00 wa ��, O .0 avcndO "0 0., +., E 0 a O a) .� cz 0 O • ov � OO 5 � o � � � a, a, a,� c� 0 .� "0 >, ° 0 03 •~ Q. `" a > ^° 1-4 a 0• :.c) = 0 OU 'o cn 3 a 0 0 .b C 0g .zOa v) v) E >, E � O 33a) . o >, o � � E .. ;? � .� CU .E 3aai �' � .byo 0 � � 03 •y00 .00 �. 0C .0aCI, g gc0 ..1= 0 -0 cn ��' .� A aO h '4moi ° w 3 • U•. ,...,= ,. a — y — w > •N U v o t6 VI C 0 0 ° ' a o 00 a o .. 0 a0 s.. •�� .r p C„ V) 0 .b a E .'� •_� 00 � Co•., aa � oa? 4 i000OO "0p = .a a oao 0 '� a`"i a aNq .n o a a p p.... 0 p cis .a E `+ a o ... ... V ea .1';) 2 � ca. o. a �; .a � ca a �? N E O 04 0 a~ 3 U .. •". 'b 0 •a co a s on ,a — b0 a p '" o. `' cd .'...� • E 1., a' a 0 0 0 a) w H '0 0 a �, 3 >, c4 PN cn 0 0 a 0 0 0 fa,a 5 0 U 0 U a a >,•^• p 0 0 0 a v; C w ed) - - O � b 2 � o w3 .r =w E ov) O a) 0 b acn c, :a o Oftfl E 'v 3 ago 6 o E 0 > 0., CS 0 = 0 c .. • cn�; 00A .0 0bCA 0 " 0 E .a a 8 >,r) w a? 3 a w a .E a) c 0 Z U O '� 0 0 0 V `• a o .0 •-• `. 'a E ° E � ,a �" ^, Oct: aai c� co c>, o o iV a, a.a3 " 0 E c� 0 cs Q, �Oi, 'vo .0 .0 .� abvId U � wal . 3Oo0i 'COs � af o0E ° a• � � VtGaa) � �' > o ; .� � :b E V 3 Ir) c°) .0 v, 0 ° 3 � .E :d ,E •c� o. c� 0 g .ag >, > oa) > �, .. Q. ., o .� w �, o 'b � w .° wow --, . a0 � '3 �° a Q+ i � bo E c � a = nov) a 10 ›. 0'a4.4 .E. . W • o oaa 0) 0 0 elw c, Qa •Z >, N 0) o o o� .. � ao0E � aO. � a 1. �c0 03 .) ) . 0 :ix.: .0 ,.., ..cn ar. . 00a) ( b45 0. c% y 2 ° ( a 1 '0 w 6 .� E ,_ 5 , a.Sova 0 c) O a Can ,ffv = ` R w «s Q •., g +��s = = „C ti OCO, c� Co b .0 O $ ...,.114.„ a)+ c. ° t1 • 0 O ,,, c4 0 a co .0 cos .-+ .c3 0 v) F'' "..1.0.-- CD , 0 •c2el) `" w a � � b 4. av6 �? • , a O 'a 0 C/� a) 0 N p ✓ E —,,, 0oa U ..O�. E ° N UQcoa) a� a,= 0 _ .. 00 . 1 ... o >" " aOO 00 V a E tea-+ 4 0 bA cn b .a C V o OV c� p 'co 0 > co z Ubo •-- _ O -d a.� o00, COcl) CA V) 0 'C CG > = 0 .0 •— > 0 Q d. 'y = y = CA -� O o 000 0 a. pN Q a ,� y '� .b o .� as ;v U U bA 0 >, CC ..0 Q 7,4 •0 3 () 0 y 0 .E w N 0 H qj O o .> bo 4, o ) a)O 4 0 rg ai O 72 ., 8t361. 12 m) Op3wflfl o� cl0 ,•,.. . v, 0 UOO ,C O mo •O ET' as s ' .i W b ." te " V o +'' a) ,.., 0 0 G , = � w =c �� y O A O R. ' ' O 'C 0 0 0 a) .= '4 U °i o .p •'" •'"- Cl) o y U C� E.., y ..y, U O IC) •C '� >, 0 O O d, "–' cet Fl Flea. > Xlal 0 ,8' g7 •� � i °' a � 4aw, a) — w 0• O '� 0 O 3 o O N 'b ,r U 0 Cd 'O O 4... Cl) 'b^0 c� ~ C c� g = U � w U 0 Nom.+ ctS C -0 0 O 'b w .at.' _ 0 C O o 0 as 0 G 0 oO 0 0 ms E O Q . 3 v, 0 A -� a) 0 ,., 3 0 o U c� �+ v, ..>U, Q cipc� ty�, v, '0 •o O O O 0 b4 cal c4 �, C ¢, E 'a -� • 0 t) E 0 bp E O 0 .., .23 2 a. a o g , ' o d 0 ,0. D a"' E L) aE N . 'o U a) In • � � Oaf = O = � E = a •o >, a..) ,-. ,,, op Cl) X30 a0E as Mgo � ° ° � c4o `J >, JDen O •� w = pyUw 0 p, prN r., c� N "a„) .n Cl) •Z —O ? w `' a O >, n> U-Jo aa)) . . '. o ,. = bo 3 .c E " o . , a .., H a aO -o .E 0 }' > o O � c 5 > •6 o oma) 3 as . 'a :3, b .ad * � a• ,i- 0rr4 '3) ° .•' = ,� tnCri�' E 0 3 ar � O � --6.,.= o >,-do � �, •v -vH ,_, S00., •c0 i O 0cri cd oo cO Lc� gO bA N 4 o a,g CL, 0 .- 0 ' F, O • ti,. , � 0 a- 0. y ' ", b 'O O >, 4, C 0 D "7N 0 Q O •- , 0L, _ 4 ,7 «., U aa) yy0 0 OOC cp w• 0Ob A > UpO03 ,. 'b a b4 cn 0 a "0V O W O O Na 6. %O U O0O '-' .` 04 ZN a•� Cl) a 0 ap Opo " ' o a 'vm '° cs c, `, = ,_, y ,0 0b c , 0 ° --, a o oa boU0 o -0oo ;� 0 ,ti0 '� • > oo " o : oM .8 c• .= gQ t 0 : ' 0 Ia) o a) c� ° a ,b`2p °6b , cs0 ....., .. o •-. , ,„ ....; --0- E E ,,,,V) 4E4 > ... d •0c, y -1 . E 0 C0.„..., ti .., p 3 O p 0 0 �, 0 w 0 b4 V 0 , 0 b4 Cs. c, «t 16' vO, > 0 O b t, .c ' a) v, ,. JD 0 0 0 w L: E E >, 0 C, '7" U bo — v) i. o o X 0 = $ C4 ' e C) �.' 0 0 0 CIS O .� ain 0 O >+ y .a O A 'c7 0 '� .� 04 ., ., E r4 •"" ;a Obtba) ,?, = .0U0cGccas as 0 E 0 bLo >, " b .0 o, 0 y 0 - 0 w c, •-, a) 0 0 ,. 0 = > r. b4� o = ‘, •o U = u2 g g .5. g Ev) 9, Aw512 :� 1 a uccc a .E o . g . � O\ U U ci — 00 .0 4' O N3 .E g 76 CU ID 0 > N OD ••-• N • a) b E-, 0 0 4400\X P4 g 'b O O\ O v, v, v, b a) N b 00 On N .O o0 ti N ta) 5 0. p M ""' .--i M 'C� C4 cn N •0 ci v'L7 I▪ - 1... N O 0 N ‘p �t O\ 0 OD 0 ,� .b bO M Ct - '7 DO U '0 ..1- CZ [f NM M > 0 GN U . rn . �O 3 0 �. 0 0 v) cct U � Q 0 a) cA.O gat) 0 0 0000 0.0 O O a) A U c� p ,--, 00 w al >, C:$ CA .0 O N 3 H� 0• a � Cd� _ EydIU U b I.a 0 8 0 _• O y c. _ O a W O M C (NI .a Q �O N V1 r. [� et ^C E .0 . a 0W. N oo 0o O )< cd CA 0 U '44a O — MAO N N N 0 O c a 8 g a w A � 0 � w+ UO ¢43 14 'p 'of fi '> .Q a+ Cj ••r va. T 45 C� Nv HBO ( V N vc vi. a) a .5p) aca,.a. � � y 4... (1.)N g HU N = 0UN V) a V) T vQCdo CA 04 bU aS V > � � O\ cn N to oo in b o � 3,� p � , w° 00 0 v ° ie, p Nen c5 0 . O OUU ° v, , i..., «S C „C O Q ON � '° wo ▪ A �' o• r-1 V g 1.41 a'0 'v , 0 v, 8 2 � .) o co o IS .0 42 '0E `" ~ '' � ' ' .. O o a) .0 04 a) C3 V ,� ab) 0 ' ' aij t . E^C un N y v) 0 -0 = 0 4, 0 0 c ci u, w 3 ai (� `" U C4 cc x o e a) a) o 00 b. -vW o .';o D g 'fl x a. F" E 2); o 0o x ,o o co a 0 0 E v, a) c a CCS 0 " y b b O0 � 0 cb t' •n - 4.. 1 0 3 E 3 3 6- v) N W u, OA 4.1). a H H A; x v1 V) — .o I5 F cV C4 a E o (1) a) ,a Cn 3 o 0 o a) E-, .1) ,co - 0 E g 3 0 al 0 g o 0 y� y 'v 0 0 4) N •� w •••:..5 E hi v — cscil-. . o ... E �0cii00 b ., o U O U ,, a)as O s� C 0 .E .— o c, c cC•2 A L.1 0 a) Ems , 0„42 0 � .0 � -oE o "yy � g4, ro 00 -cs ca O O coo 0 b a 3 N O Cr) N'b O U o 0 c. bq. O 0 �A 3 0 o a cs -z >,g ... .t3 o = ;E E an g, a) a, 3 a) � = 0 000 jp0 - 'r 0 E .., U .� .nom ~. > — • U . .o 0 a) E i °. aso E0 >, 3 -o , 2 � o0a, 4) v, .0 o 0 T yxiz, a.0 Q -0 as cn a.) t-5 +5 O O ...... E a) � o oo 'o = CU bil'wo �, o a .. o a, . °w' , 00 � � t :ccoa rx 3 0 0 a, 0 . • 4" E. "v � o cd °o. (4a ) 0 0 = cto � �' >, 0• � 0EE " = 3 o o .„- s Fs 0 oo = i 0 0 a) aa, el � � cE •a', o = �? "" cn .� • r... O '�' O 0 0 0 a) OE- '" 0 '— 3 a0ibc. 00 `dc`� x `� .c' .n a. w N — c# %fl 0 ON .C4 •^ o '� a) 'b `_' a) C •U ON w 0 CT = 'b a' � -d 9, c OE-: >, w xA ..3.-),3 — a a) Q w - -d O a) 0 A9 C ir, '.= C40 ' Ma. > •b0' �n 0 >,.� U 0o a) 0\ O. C +-. O0 0 .0C,•.� wo00c0g a > oU— a. . a) a) o cd cd .- Q O 1t7 U s., cnO a) 4-. a a' Ea) b � cc3 cd ov f ' o • � 5 - 0 13, - -5 � bOLTJ 0 -0 .oE0 — o ; ad E a 4.4 › 3co„ rri 6, E .0 ,C 0 ^" a. 3 a) o o .0 338 .E 4° E o +, , ° > c^d o OUB, � N _ o0 a) RSV 3 •8 cd E c.)"14 ov08 2a � E � o0o) bbE . 80 p a. >,'O v sU, • w N 4; cd .0 > 0 ..., O .b .4. — v, C cd 'cn 0 d,0 0 8 L7 V) — C4 2 2 s ■ g § r ` / § • „ 8 § R 9 § ( a — I _ _ vf 2 � / @ § § §k CO ON 2 F. § < 2 . . U w / ` - it ( k \ ( / § r ! Q _ - < § A. _ „ § K e k ( ( fa az ` & $ w ` 2 8, k 't.. � W3 £ 1.4 el p (1) § M E § § .4 § Z D i k2 J = £ @ S F. CC - ! s — 2 E § A § t ; e $ re- _ m_ . ( — k § - cn < # ! . ?.> 0 f ■ 2 elx — § B � § I [ ; _ F. f "'] � - , gg } 2 O 4 £ f . 5. < s ; ) k B k k } ` _ i R e . _ ■ ] , - 2 g ■ ( m ) " ! § I— § ri L' . _ ; ; n n ; • S / 0 ) \ R § $ o _ - ? eg § , ® { 2 § 71' m ! § 11 - § ) < , 2 } . � § g B k ( ( $ k % k % 1 § E ! 5 1 § f§ ■ f Z Ts § A B § \ _ q En ; 2 = 2 s /j- .-- § ; £ _ a I ..i .i -- - / _ f f - - ( F. k . w .2 9 — g u z A. A. A. A. A } 7 R PeR = 2 ) ) -— < § e•-• - . - on § C..) § § vs '0re ; „ . . ■ u 6 V ..... .4 i § w k ke.k }LU . § ■ ° ■ _ CO D CI § 0 co Z < } el [ } @ ° _ CC E < O . ct . ) . .4 % CA § ; g f _ W - " 0.- ( ) § S S S S 2 ƒ • 2 14 )§ k 2 a STs # � • )2 / 0 <£) _ § ) Zo V o z 6°® B & , C & § ■ g PI A ' F. - - - g § - CI) 0 § [ ; _ _ A § EtXg — & ` 0 2 § i § ( I § ] 2 2 2 ] \ } el 44 P , . [ [ k 7 k k \ H _ .3 2 ! i } { ( it i P i ! _ 2 § .. k § Cel m E ƒ 2' e § ; 2 ( ) ° 2 ) 2 / § § / 2 § 2 § < ) ,74- ., k \ m _ _ , - 7< . ` — k w Z : < u c m - 7 a 3 6 \ a g ) - 7. \ R R » - § — ` , § f preen 0en § WI ( - § — \ £ .0 ; , * 0' 0 < V w 2 z R = se = > > > ( > J - » ° m CO M 0 . • , ° co , Q o - — 1 E . ) CC [ <• p. V 2 _ a < / z - z / e ® § " 2 - W ) - ~ , CA (; J § 3 Z �� § / /\ — — 1 k )) \ , A 2 § - - lic _ — C §\ , re - \ @ e e 7 - ) ° ( » » » » & ) rx m F re f § t , g 5 2 - k cri ; } £ 2 ; , , ; ( , , , , — 04 [ w } G4 ; C ( , \ k \ k 0 en , \ Tr /2 E. I f 41 } < 14 / k \ ) < c o = ¥ \ % / k 0 § & w 2 1 ILI} _ f. IP. o I V) NO O 00 N00 O O N g N < < < 0. — < •G v) v1 vi •6 a ( N 00 N en ;:j G q - N P h a t 2 z 0 < - C m -m F. N e _ - 0 — a Ct N C a en ul rO Ci C. : C- < Qg C. < CCv „ VVI Y C v, v, ? Ce < .- `a — k7 0. a 0 0 a e. o; o o - e m L wO vi .{ vi vi •G ao N lr N O - Q T — Q < U L < < 2 z x x c, u. < < m v u c •' x ti > > > > d 6 d C u g w t; E 0 CL p to < N O CI Z ...1 -4 — Q .J', — t Q z z h F 0 oo wN N r '/^ N h / oO 9 E A ` -. 0 00 W W pai re P `J 4;K f II RF�--�I C I v T v O cW ......C.. >7. N - oo r - v? o eiC <L < _ n F < 5C: < CC B z x u. _ z $ MM1 C,7 h H h H h F- , Frl = n a h Z •Cla v q—.21.--, f-1 ,!.; 88 v u COD C, O N N n CO Ccc „ p. 0 /1 V N U .1 o` s z , : ; ; ; : ; ; : ; ; : : ; ; : fVa>• <ele veel 01 Q dF0 Cl < W N t.: < 0 E' 3 p E...4 O z < = c V 0 ul u. 9 < c u ca Z.L. z E CA 1-• t/ h fA Vf fA N to V; vi (n v F E E1 W N T- E we 0 L O . 0 p ,-. r QCT N V) V' VI 't ° ai -c a 0, ami — a) O ° O��"Q 3 O = a) . •'" a„ = R Q wO U cr 0N . A.0 gc. -6. .0 c0 0 U 0 b `' N I g O i o 4 • -o o a, ,c < .D o • `" °' a > f� 2 c0a as, ° w — b°Q ° a= C/> Uo, � .a - t c a= a . a) E . , Ow� a•v N �. c •.. •c a. " 0c'' Ua ° o — o ,a i 'ti cs a.) 4 a U .r — .� 3 w '-a 3 c`si .ca Q O 0 b? A c w 0 O C a O a) .a E p 0° ~ a O 9— ' 34, >; a — a) c a. ti N a 0 a) >, Haan... •b > a) 0 '� � .� •v ,n Q IS DN 7; I °q a 5 a 1,4 to' � " Oo ' L `V• � U S a .,, C4 C . a'D -o0 ..1 cz 3 >,.i a = a � E c _ oa a. `' '^ ° 0 a'0 h y �O 0 a) -p a, "" P__. a] 0 0 k a c4 0 b a o - al `., -a— C U a tu .-, •0 O O N c� 0.a 'c +. �+ ,E c � 3aai «3 U S: L" ,Uy c� K 4Cta-, Cz .s. O O SiO 'C 0 +O 5 ^c 04 4-, f,y b .0•• c1 v� y ._ ° > C - c E —N cc 0 U ° � Oa b U �= O b Cl, rn V) • — roc ----- --- --� a • .ILI •. E p 0 4 + n, 1 AiA 1 C+ 11 WW ~+ 1 / I *� w / � WZ < p Q , — E ill. i MvN / W �<3 2 b< <b ui g � R.2I5.2 QQ fr / v0 - m1 ,_ W , `t . F w i . ` { �� ` Licr„.., ; 1 ; i ; .-(1) 1 I t ` • a _ s ti/ � r. . A )- I t t b.) ' 7 < Fi Z > N ‘''E i :... I .! !I :6 �; —fir �',... °5 I '.juv <'IN•� /// = ! 6: : t: w-' :6 &-: W W 8: W ! — lip rnS / \\. I I1� o .4. 1 1 ,e, m,_ ,..iii ' NNZlI. • .. 41.E a<2 \ N N1_60„fillt _ 'L ? iI yII ��1At° 111 3 1 11mhi& ',I'. / .� f 11r;� ►- a r^ \ is..._....._:" -. 3 N. -.,� , 1 \ 6 r 1 J \ I Is 5 - \\ t ' I N G C Z \ \\ gill �\ ` � tI- I RI 1 ffff N;` \ .. \ I „......„........................., ., .._ ,• kilt J ., — 0 a F" E ., on c ., v a) c� a b o0b° � — Q 3 o •�o - U y b a) = v .E g C ,.. Ri_y 41,; — �, � F � o pq .' 0 - � ,0 3 in •a" cn a = a� a) b0 U 3 0 0 Ur v) 0 cs O 1... a) ..- E—, c oi' a ,, 4 �° °a) 0 gyU 6 ° Q � - 1-1 >,te = i.. O Ua � � .CD r. , ib ) A— o ' > teaaU , 0 , ' bo , c0O ? co) NaU macc ) ) -4-, o 0 a) :~ ° 0 .r K •1 tw GQ7S c49 a) a, ami a • GO CD4-0 ,o ff,4 ., ��.' 0 7-1 '� wOw [O nU°= 173 ° o4, °-oa 0.4 ao 01 w o ' A °co o d • .rma, oU.0 o0 C o RU N. bo go O g•4a) a w a) a) Vcl, 0 ,E, U° O cz .0 I.-,) a) o — • • � . ad().� E -,c 4� ° 04.-1 a ° � � as0V 3_ ° 4- QN 7.1 >, ›,° ocCO S '7CtUOGO N a O > c:1 N aa ' " . > Cc . � Cl. � co • aQ � 33y , ▪ V �� o (.. 4:..., •' oq 0 ° - g4" ° 01 = pcVU � coay20 ..= = .a� iv = 33 — Sao g � o a.) 1.-, = - 0 . o = o o. aP :. t 3 ?Cwoyy q p . 0 .> — ms o N _ U O - O 0 0o -471 " C'b '� y Q > OA., ,� , •.., ,, a) 000 m °) 3 0000g ` la' � " �wRsa � a) ao � �aQ tr.ba al a 0 - 44 v ' o 0 U o ) ) a) al c> w -a ( ' a, w 'ba0 0N � w0aON ..0 i. = li • a)0 O E � ) C � 'OU .., a 0 O , 6a aZ. — 0 . 4 a , c, �, 6 . �°'- O 2 � 0oa) U3 ° � 0 foE0 ,. Cl 6) cl o o .n r .r > accZ = `a) a ) bo0ct o a) ) c- Clc_ f ° ai � Hv)C6 •o := U cU S A a.F < ° 3 _ u) CO C.) - gw 0 bA 0 0 a E ko «t 10 � O v) 0' ,^ '" ° 3 °b y a) Ect0E� a) aca .� �., b4 c. E-1 vl ... O c. Q 0s. a) �' rn +.+ >, Q .— r.. w a) a3)cn �y 0 '~ • ,a a a) S '° � oboe) 5 ° gam 4 ,v a. 2 0 15 VA w ° 0 a ,,0 •E as 0 3 0 � �b alQ p ti E 0 ° 'b v4 F" ° y U a, a) cid a) c� cz I" 0 •zi rn cit .� Ca4 ... a) >, � Ew° � � p � Ec. 3 � v) `� .?% a (4arig -. q3 .� 0 0 = '' � o ° ° g00 ^, 0 � . • .. 3 5, Lv) 0 -0g > a 4. 003 [ 3 aE 5 ' = o (4 a 0 w 05o0p 2 , 0 = 0bioO q pC "l 7Uw 0 . 00 N >« 0 r4 0 a,A ° cs •.. � a ) a � � — N . w '40 ° o c o ; o n c - a ,� a) >,-4 � +. - U ° 0 0 E 0 O cA >,- . � re) 9 0� E� � m > fl 0 w o ) a 0i p o .°. 1:3 E « O a E ;coo ° '� `� •� o� �r" y o � a) N c. c > O a Ern . _E-+ o �•d alb � .awb 0 •� . i � -0 p, 4.) • •,.. �o � � � Q"•N O ., Oc� � 'c �a ° � — a) .� '. 0 00 czt � w, ar 0 3 .0 0. ¢, r) .0 U w CI ° p p .Q 0. ° E ° 80 15 in E Cl `° � 2 4 o E = ,,; = 0 ac4 0 , 3 o 42 ` � O' O 0 o t�t ,� ) a SA • Owa) 0 U 3 , N a > y g = bO b0 U I-, +, Ut•I 0 -•,, 5 ,..5 ) .'° co 00N0 a.) g4 ba 0 � 4,0 0 0 M 1. 1 4) 0 .r P -c� A1...4 N o> 0 ' 3 � .. g oao3g 1.4 � ci, 0 1,, •• — 33 to al t-, 4,) 8o � > oco 0 o o ° �" o °'� 00 ko . ° � S kr) c4� -0 ' .:b2 � .•o ° •� 4 0 =, 52, c6 = E a) cn — ° 0 0a) � '� '- .E a) :E w O 0 A ° bf) ,, o � �-, a . 'S o '' E ,-a '.~ 'O TA w ..N-, 3 �° •-, i�., 'y 3 u cz . w E � 0 a. o = � '-a8 wg � = ago) go y 0 Uc� � ,, g 31 � b 00 �� ,� a) el)a .144 b•4 o � .�•� 4 ,� •� 00O N •3 U a) O4� 0 > 0 a a � 8b 0 1.) -0 ., E - ti a8 o "v „2 a � 0 a a ° t,4.,::, 0 0 •.: ° E o 1.4° t..4 'w ° 0 U p c, rn Clbo ° o ; o a ° 0 .0 0 a) 3 I ,� CZ >,= y U E ' ' y a. 0 i .9 ow U a) 0 w b i a 4 b U la ¢ 2 E ao y .F x •� 8 3 act rx a4 E 8 •b g &I V) — Cl) va V) •••• '"" w �4 U 0 O 2 O 0. 4... U ... Ti 1).0 0 c9 a9 v) 0 >, 0 -. �. ix �••, ,, CZ g a 3 cn 1-4 ° 040 V O 0 ai .4 q 0 = 0 = 0 > a) ..g .4 O C w 0 bO � E" � )4 • � o0 as > Vog o00 ,0 � ga�i .vcn 3 .0o a) o � o ai1-, V . � `., 3 a ° � 4) > x - o y� = � ¢ cu..„ 3 c, 3 o � a 0 G, c' G, 0 C w .� 0 O CA 0 CA v a c. 0 2 c�S o a 0 p0 a CO) " C1 o si rA" la, o o+ a) so3 .5) 04- 0 w >,00 E , o o a-i c a) v > 2, ...4 V ~ Ow o - ' 0 ` ' O 3 ' g° o ° cc0 �2au• o co n 0 > = cl = �,o � ..= ° oo'o0 . .4 'ti O � ° ° a0' � iW+, , P ,, O p V 5� r 1,4 I. Oa • , ,s � w > CI Q x •E 0. •.' ° .~ O ° to ¢ v O = 02 C 46 y ' s. "d b M �" ti 3 c� '�' °, a 0 . . 0n , U o N V. n N .4 >a, Ce4) ti g 0) i > 0 .0 3 cn � � .� � � o o � i 3c o 6 o °) y00 ._I koC4 1.4 0 a) '.1 ' O C �O A 10. a) 0 csi ,, 'a3 0 3 > c'� a).4 0a) A a) — O C'a .s4 .M -" Y 0 � -0, rx 3 o a) w O .C .4 p ti ti vi _cl 1.4 O 4- 2 ccz 00 0 b 0 = C 0 u) CA p O V boy/ a� � vrn � ` o0 '� a) 3- CA 4-a• frl O a) . 2� v � � o — V � 4x P a) 0.) ) ca) Q, aa) ti .° g > aXQc: .° octt1 CO , .a3a015 r � '� S 1 � a C a) o mO .0 .a0vc. ° ° , , b a) a).-. 0 o a a . ai (1) Vc:' cn o :. ° 0 a; E ,.: -0 o O 0 y O 0 o 0 ° C 4 ao ca, w ° OH .O x •• x C 3 ca a ° v '-' 9 i ¢ c°) o ° 4. R., .� c"� gsE" c 0 _ = 0 0a w 3 ° cad � aaaa� 0 >, c0) a) 3 a V a) t >,.c ° y .) > N a 0 G" 4 ° o RE ° U 3 a0 .r, ay +4 a CD a ,Z ° ›, o ; 4 . .1...,>.,,'N v' C C. o >, wcis 0 0 0 -, › a r>'+ cdLa, O •5, a) . jz C i., ° J.., •.p C 0 0 k r, a ° 3 to 10 � p" '�. " � � o 'Fw > � `" °) t; ao °) ' 3o w . 0 ya p — w > f a) 1-4 p., o = 0 V ct a, p, ci Q :vnai a-v > g w A QR ° > a o � ao °w0 Q . � ) ' — Cl) V) CA 0 Cri — 0 0 0 0 .� s , o ,� 0 1.4 0 � a)>G w ON0 y QE (1) b.°wO a) G..) O 0 ° C 0a..ft, E-1 g0 a. 0 .0 >, 0 ".r 0.b CD C as .�" ° 4) 'C7 0 .0 > U Q •:� ••-•1 GCS Gvi ".•+ a) rn ' ma, .." t'"" ^,+ , -0 0 �" V •,_,2 "' . s~ 00o 000 - Cda) Gc bo'a :oa, �C7 .0 CZ > .� Qy .n - ami w0 Eo - aC 4- 0 Q•° > p'0 ' oQ " LQ G° C 't7 ( 4 a cn > ° «S °' w o • � 3 o s :n �o .c o w -. • L, 64 00 — 8 _ ° a0 . Gt0 a� crd' a, cn �." .0 by.0 (r '+ '=S 'O • _ N 2080 0 8 O C O GO 0 E = >,.14 ON 0 0 U t 0 ° E a 'C7 0 a) s O ,-� - 3 ' cC sr 0 •' 0 .is GI a) >,E-' vA 0 4'" .n 1-, .D O 0 � > a a �oQ � a�iQo • 0ao a � b000 ° �' � a>) O � O fl) w, G�> � a a0io0ai*-. 0 a) >, -" E 0 b0 000 � •� A O -c0 •C7a a) O v0 • >, ," `°' a o la 0 y 0 a 0 y 0 O TA — > 5 ag "o o 0 G"a i.4 .c > EUa '" s 3 c �'-' 0s. 0 ..Z ••= � '4 g0 ." �aEC a 'b � 00 ° ' E 0e > b4 E" .0 0 V .. .. .� bil :.2 4 a o bn � o c ° ow 0 Cl.)m3 ¢ x " a • a E 1 aw di E o".0 03 wa 0 ° N O •- -P.- " E� U a'" Ec"18i1413 a A U is 'C°,wb°A ° a g t > :� at =0 an 0 .d '� .0 ``" a) C 0 0 .•, 03 CI = O Q 0 cs 0 ti" cc ioo b � � ° � wo�1. w � oSnE �' v ° - -- � • a) 0 .0 'va 1.:3 a.) � �° Qo - F. � oa ° o N «s a) > = c$ .O 0 E-,, 0 ° 0 -- ' L:" w a U � .� o `� � '� U O '"°- va��i 3cam, 0 ° . •- x0 0 w b U � wOOa w � oaa � v, .- 0 .m : s � � 0 . 4-' 1=1 ° g a) `," 0a1' a) E to �, , > O - - U -0 0 U a) E E O 0 E- ,.. 4- '-1 � 0 oQ - P-, , ,.., 0 E a) >0e 'cw o 7, -" . c" �O a — a) -d ON ij.' a) U O a cs ... �, N 1., ° bn.Eo = v .-. � cal 0 -. 0 0 „s, cal o C > 0 �O 0 ab c -o O 0 U 3 +�' c o a B g '- '6' 0 g > cn o t• oa E 0 4ge g a0) 8 0 01 0 0 - > .c 0 a �; 0 3 •0 bA^" •'v� w a 0 . 0 a) G o •.. "0 ,.c E •U 4 000 bC ii `r° E � a0 3 0 � P �ao _ < U 'v O w i 3 4- 0 4a :0 3U '4 a 0 0 ani 0 0U >, ° It:,E ° F E 3 000 oE -,::,>'.h.) .� ;sr ``" .s~ 4- 0 � = 3 :? 03 = mob ° O � 0is0 '� Ob = U > vva � a2 .� 3 > 0 c4 t > (4.40 > q V c4 cg a) a) ° ° Z C% -- C b >,•.:.,. 0 .—, w 0 ami w >,U :+- ae cn Q 5 ti r� � 0 00 E > a 0 '" aioi., �' v_, cc U0o 3 sQF" O N O a %"r OE 0 • "E ‘ 0O � V 0 > 0 . as s 3 A V 4 . E � > � QQO � N g E0 °A ' • • � E o o 0 � 00o � w 0 � bc� 0 — 0 .0 c`z •= 30 0 � a) o 0 ° r< 11 8 g tc-g ,. 5 g aA 2 g = 3 Q M :; w., 4-9. E E. Z. cu E R4 o rn0 := G° 0 a - - U? C 'C- 0 0t, CO C 7,/ O O • � 417,' 'D C c� m .0 0. C:o •� o. c 0c • : o O U U Og ' w � � c cGs a L C. Q Yv 0, p0 000 1)WOc4° F 0. U U UUU U t.3 cqU U cal a> a> Z. 4 C4 4) U E C C ca mai ;D C Q .4, G C C C C N '0 'Cr 'D 4.) a [L tsc., L a) cn Li 0. 0. L4 C C L L. a> a) a> a) 3 C:au a v) v> v) 4.) •� Cl) I) U " ;g 6. C7 C) 4 �� T c C C v? cn cn 0 u: m v) ci U ZZ § §Zs ¢ ¢ ¢ QU a -�� � Z Z N) 69 H9 69 CO G C T O C D U . C U 3E � Q 0. a ON on $ -— P$ oc, o0 N T o E E E T.: .. .c - c c - c A., 0) ctiCO CO CO CO co C Cl) CO T CO _ — C C C ... .. C •-.S C C .O C C C C C O C 0cct v; C Co `� c0 °" • Q. - O UU ao yEU EU Ecz '+rw E T w E T w-. w E > ,,.., 3d3Q acn U U v) U U v) v) v? v? U U U v) c' � x U P.4 Z o = C N .0 C .b I_, v; _ :G C no C U -etn ccy �`s E C' - c a) c •`^ c 'ns �' .c .2 a> h4] — L' .� C C C w T .� C o.'. '. c.3 y C .0 ,sa W C O M .0 CI. O O C O O .�.. C C L 2..), C3 O C C% Q 'u 3 0 0 0 a o aci 4.) :-.4 0 3 L CO T. u 0 f C/; o o a> > w ) o c P. • c Cl)oY 3 a 3 Cl.) c > ct7 U •u, a> 4) 0. 0.... C O .0 au p h > � c o L co EcaO ayccr, - o � � ai p ,� �) CZ a> 4) 1. 3 N P- .. c o C .c "le a. CO .9 .= K .3 C a v 3 Q 3 c c c a 2 v) > o O¢ K 4) c (1") a> (4 7 .O «S C .� O `° tn. CL'O U p("' U o W a : a C a oC E C C _� ? C E C ,.c^�.. .a aLL Vj o a> o c o ac> 2 .=' G O W a^i CO.0 co E cc > .c C(%) a>>u? c «? o Q F 14 H FAA F .E ad 2 U n.c.c. Q .ca 0 CI). Cl) c.) = a Qv C) i.:,-., F ^ U JM a)CC N Z nr:0-, = A d M U U Uch b C.:,Q' O Z v) v) �) v) c).) v) v) v) Cr) Cr) v) Cr) Cr) Cr) CT - v) 0) c 0 •a y UU c U U o ^ OO Qg a a a aa a c U U U _ UU UUUUUU U U 4) 0) 0) 0 0) a` El.) �o to co co 0, ocu o0 L C c7 c3 Rf 40 ''• L — U U U U -c U U U U .� U U U U U U o G� ' c c C C c c c c a d a c c LL LL. IL Lt. L.L. LL If [L. 4L [L [L X � N N Q) N 0) C) C) C) y N c CU C.) 0) 0) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 CIC/) Cl) G7 G7 Cn Cn rn C) (%) V) C//)) x ca Z Z' czt a a a 4 Z cu L' c c Q C/) � � C/) Cl) CI) v) CI) Cl) C/) 4 N fl U v) o ^ O o ,c N Q cc) v? CC Ea 64 64 64 E.4 64 CT 64 6? M 6? L — CC C C a ;a v N L ro 0)) E= L a) c ()\ Q —C — — — C N C\ U °` § •� N N N c- N N N Q — C- C\ N C Q. a C Coo =on 3 3 3 3 3 Loo -. x x x .- - -a 3 .3 r. x x T L n. c U U . g acs a Ca o U U U Ua �,-� T-" U U U 0 U U U U U 0U C 3 •_c o c o c CN Pd v 7 O c o tz U c a) :? c > v; N 0< N 1.. C C L X 62 •• U E W ,-. > C .�.. N '- - L L C C X N K x C/) 3 Lam, a a C .C. .0 C/) G7 C 4) a a �. , X Cn ) p' U T C ...%4 e aL) �V) C X G7 E Q U C H. 3 '3j E C X U :: H H a v)GI U a H E a% S C O a a 0) tr. C v E° X y - a L cc.0 X Xco co •� C L a c7 C It cc co U aoeCa o HG1 F p 3 c 'C 3 .c .0 C o X �+ c U U trl axi cis F �W aiv) F' _ �U � v) h C aLi ra Cco, 3 c v) -W v v g f cd — E 3 c a XQ aU �¢ xCC 5R pi W N vou)) orn cc.4 cv) cv) aci cc o U v)L7 G7 G7 �v7 to t/) W a C U U > V c3 — .. .L .0.Q _ — — .-. V T. Q Z cn C/ Cl) G? G7 L7 G7 Cl) U U) C/) C/) C/) CI) C/) C/) L7 V) V) — V) / § g= - g g 6.7-4 « ca = c _ a2 ° » k — oo - o ucco \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ C) aB2 ■ QBI = aB2 = co O O y \ / > > C. > 2 I > / a \ 0 \ \ / \ / \ \ 2 0 7 » �\ k k R & \ y Z Z Z / Z — _ . Q / / / ƒ - - r - 3 / - K = % / ± \ E§ m = 3 § / i/ \ - 2 ƒ / / § j •\ / \ 0 0 0 U 0 - § © « 4.: » Cl) \ Cl) \ / Cl) _ 0 Cl. 0 O. CU k " Z C. \ 7 : ` t ! F4 \ � � \ F \ \ 6 P c = c = c = .- a § / » f / } / } ƒ � � \ . ts T cc: 4, C \ _ _ _ § / \ , � \ \ / \/ •� \ e \ C of ® / k « , amu ( � _ $ o \ \ / \ \ \ '5 / � / ° R x ° R x / 6 t § 0) ° ° 5 4 r £ - % \ \ < 9CJ \ } /§ \ \/ cxa./\ / k :\ .0 sae e r ..1.. / \ \ \ \ V) Update of 1982 Infiltration and Inflow Study City of Shakopee Minnesota SEH No. SHAK02056.00 December 6, 1993 Revised May 18, 1994 L L L L L LSHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC . L =SEN L MULTIDISCIPLINED . SINGLE SOURCE . L Update of 1982 Infiltration and Inflow Study City of Shakopee, Minnesota SEH No. SHAKO2056.00 _ December 6, 1993 Revised May 18, 1994 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my _ direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. atp‘:/ /9 David F. Simons DATE: 7 — 17 REG. NO: 19699 _ REVIEWED BY: cif DATE: f 'q Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 3535 Vadnais Center Drive St. Paul, Minnesota 55110 (612) 490-2000 =SE - 5909 BAKER ROAD,SUITE 590,MINNETONKA,MN 55345 612 931-9501 FAX 612 931-1188 ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION December 6, 1993 RE: Shakopee, Minnesota Revised May 18, 1994 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SEH No.: A-SHAKO2056.00 City of Shakopee Attn: Mr. Dave Hutton, P.E. City Engineer/Director of Public Works 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee MN 55379 In accordance with your authorization, we have revised the attached Update of the 1982 Infiltration and Inflow (1/I) Study. The revision takes into account the excessive I/I which occurred during the 1993 flood, as recently reported to the City of Shakopee by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. The information presented in this report is intended to supplement the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan which is currently being prepared for the City of Shakopee. This report discusses the I/I in the River District and the improvement alternatives which were considered for the River District Trunk Sewer. We would be pleased to review this report with you in greater detail at your convenience. Sincerely, CoA.A.,; A07(4,4.A- / Daniel R. Boxrud, P.E. • Project Manager ymb SHORT ELLIOTT MADISON.WI HENDRICKSON INC. ST.PAUL,MN ST.CLOUD,MN CHIPPEWA FALLS,WI _ Table of Contents _ Certification Page Letter of Transmittal Table of Contents Section 1 — Conclusions and Recommendations 1 _ 1.1 Conclusions 1.2 Recommendations Section 2 — Introduction 4 2.1 Authorization 2.2 Resources 2.3 Purpose Section 3 — Background Information 6 3.1 River District 3.2 Minnesota River Stages 3.3 MWCC Lift Station L-16 3.4 Rahr Malting — Section 4 — Approach 11 4.1 Condition of River District Trunk Sewer 4.2 Measuring I/I Rates 4.3 Evaluation of Alternatives Section 5 — Results 13 5.1 River District Trunk Sewer Televising 5.2 Fluorometric Flow Analysis 5.3 Comparison of I/I Rates 5.4 MWCC System-Wide Evaluation of I/I Section 6 — Improvement Alternatives 18 6.1 General 6.2 Reconstruction 6.3 Polyethylene Liner 6.4 Polyester Resin Impregnated Liner 6.5 Chemical Sealing 6.6 No Improvement — I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page i Section 7 — Cost of Alternatives 23 7.1 Cost Summary 7.2 Comparison of Alternatives Tables Table 1 Reference Stages of Minnesota River at Shakopee 8 Table 2 Results of March 22, 1992, Flow Testing 15 Table 3 Minnesota River Stages and I/I Rates 16 Table 4 Volume of I/I in Spring of 1992 20 Table 5 Cost Summary of Improvement Alternatives 23 Figures Figure 1 Location of River District 7 Figure 2 Stage of Minnesota River at Shakopee, March - April, 1992 9 Figure 3 River District Trunk Sewer during 1992 Televising 14 Figure 4 Shakopee Monthly Flow Comparison 22 Appendix Al Cost Estimates for Improvement Alternatives A2 TV Inspection Logs of River District Trunk Sewer, 1977 A3 TV Inspection Logs of River District Trunk Sewer, 1992 A4 Fluorometric Study of I/I in River District Trunk Sewer, 1992 I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page ii Section 1 Conclusions and Recommendations 1.1 Conclusions 1. In 1980, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) established guidelines with an upper limit of 1500 gallons per day per inch pipe diameter per mile of pipe (gpd/in/mi) of infiltration and inflow (I/I) to help in determining whether or not a community has potentially excessive I/I. I/I in Shakopee's River District Trunk Sewer has a history of exceeding the USEPA's guideline of 1500 gpd/in/mi, as indicated in the 1982 I/I Study. The fluorometric I/I testing completed in 1992 confirmed that I/I rates in all segments of the River District Trunk Sewer _ continue to exceed the USEPA's guideline during certain periods of the year. 2. The draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan suggests a policy to implement I/I reduction measures when I/I comprises more than 20% of the total flow of a sewer. The I/I rates measured during 1992, though greater than the USEPA's guideline, are significantly below 20% of the total flow of the River District Trunk Sewer. 3. The River District Trunk Sewer televising showed a number of active leaks, roots at some joints, significant pipe settlement, offset joints, low flow velocities, and considerable sediment in some areas. Surprisingly, most of the pipe sections themselves are still structurally sound. 4. It appears that the amount of I/I observed in the River District Trunk Sewer has a direct correlation to the stage of the Minnesota River. This indicates that much of the I/I is attributable to infiltration due to seasonally elevated groundwater. During periods of extremely high river stage, submerged manholes may also contribute inflow to the River District Trunk Sewer. 5. Pipe settlement, accumulation of sediment, and excessive I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer have contributed to surcharged flow conditions extending over 1000 feet upstream of the Rahr Malting discharge during normal operation of Rahr Malting. 6. Results of the fluorometric testing suggest that infiltration is suppressed when Rahr Malting is discharging to the River District Trunk Sewer. Hydrostatic pressure on -" the outside of the main due to an elevated water table is equalized by the heavy flow inside the main. 7. Major floods such as occurred in 1993 contribute an extra 100 million gallons per year I/I, which impacts Shakopee's sewer bill from the MWCC and the upsizing of MWCC lift station L-16. 8. The most cost effective improvement alternative for the City of Shakopee is the "do nothing" alternative. The cost of this alternative would be the cost of treating the I/I. However, treating the I/I is not considered a long-term solution to the I/I problem because of likely changes to MWCC treatment rates specifically aimed at I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 1 encouraging removal of I/I. In addition, not removing the I/I impacts the available — capacity of the River District Trunk Sewer and the MWCC facilities downstream. 9. Chemical sealing appears as one of the next most cost effective alternatives for I/I reduction. Chemical sealing is not considered a permanent alternative due to the need to periodically repeat the procedure. 10. The segment of the River District Trunk Sewer located in Huber Park between the old T.H. 169 bridge and Market Street (from manhole 20 to manhole 28 on Figure 3) has settled significantly. This segment should be reconstructed under any — permanent improvement alternative. 11. Slip lining the River District Trunk Sewer with a polyethylene liner west of the old T.H.169 bridge in combination with reconstruction east of the bridge is considered a permanent improvement alternative. It would result in a capacity reduction which would cause a surcharged condition of approximately 3.7 feet over the top of the — pipe at the most critical location. Although the elevations of basements along the River District Trunk Sewer are unknown at this time, it is possible that this amount of surcharge would be unacceptable due to the possibility of flooding basements. 12. Under the total reconstruction alternative, the River District Trunk Sewer from manhole 25 (RD12) to manhole 37 (ED01) would be increased in size from a 21" — diameter to a 24" diameter to accommodate the projected ultimate peak flow (as identified in the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan) without surcharging. The reconstruction alternative has a higher cost than the polyethylene liner,the chemical — sealing, or the "do nothing" alternative. 13. The polyester resin impregnated liner has the highest cost of the improvement — alternatives. Flow capacity after installation may be as good or better than the original capacity. — 1.2 Recommendations 1. Review the I/I policy suggested in the draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan regarding — implementation of remedial measures when I/I comprises more than 20% of the total flow. Consider either lowering this standard below 20% (to be more consistent with the USEPA's 1980 guidelines) or stipulating that the I/I removal proceed when — financially feasible or when needed to restore sewer system capacity. 2. Complete an inspection of each property within the River District to determine — compliance with ordinances on sump pumps, roof leaders, and foundation drains, since reduction of I/I originating on private property is usually the most cost effective I/I to remove. 3. From a financial standpoint, the "do nothing" alternative should be continued because it is the most cost effective. However, the chemical sealing alternative — could be further investigated. The City may wish to chemically seal a small segment of the River District Trunk Sewer and use it as a trial section. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 2 4. Continue to monitor the evolution of"no-dig"processes and their suitability for this project. Informal bids could occasionally be obtained from contractors on chemical sealing, slip lining, etc. This would allow for periodic updates of the estimated costs given in this report and review of the financial feasibility of I/I removal. 5. The physical condition of the River District Trunk Sewer should be carefully monitored during routine maintenance. Information contained in this report should be used to help identify manholes and castings which may need repair, areas where root cleaning is needed, and locations where manholes are particularly subject to inflow due to their susceptibility to flooding. This sewer is already over 30 years old and is approaching its design life of 50 years. Complete rehabilitation may become necessary due to deteriorating physical condition, even if not cost effective from an I/I removal standpoint. 6. The impact of I/I during major floods such as occurred in 1993 needs to be further addressed. It may be more cost effective to remove I/I from the River District and East District Trunk Sewers than increse the size of downstream facilities. Without I/I removal, the MWCC may not be able to provide the domestic capacity the City of Shakopee needs. 7. Funding for a solution to the I/I problem should be sought so that it is available if needed. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 3 Another reason for analyzing the I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer is the capacity problem that has been experienced at MWCC Lift Station L-16. A combination of high discharge levels by Rahr Malting and significant I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer have contributed to the lift station experiencing flows which exceed the design capacity during certain periods of the year. The 1992 Facility Plan for improvements to the MWCC Lift Station L-16 suggests that the lift station will need to be upgraded in the near future to accommodate a larger flow. Removal of the excess I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer could reduce peak flows at the lift station. Finally, the I/I problem needs to be periodically analyzed to determine if I/I reduction — can be cost effective for the City. With escalating wastewater treatment costs and new "no-dig" sewer rehabilitation techniques being developed every year, I/I reduction can become cost effective where not previously cost effective. In addition, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has discussed several I/I incentive/disincentive programs which could eventually result in additional charges to those communities with potentially excessive M. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 5 Section 3 Background Information 3.1 River District The River District is shown in Figure 1. The sanitary sewer system in the River District consists of the River District Trunk Sewer and several lateral sewer mains which pick up — flow from the Central District and West District. The River District Trunk Sewer is constructed of reinforced concrete pipe and ranges in size from 15" in diameter on the west end to 21" in diameter on the east end. Until 1960, the sewage flow from the City was discharged directly into the Minnesota River through several collecting sewer lines. At that time, a primary sewage treatment — facility was constructed (at present site of Lift Station L-16) and the River District Trunk Sewer was added to intercept these outlets and convey the waste to the new treatment plant. The River District Trunk Sewer was initially designed with a 1.0 MGD reserve capacity for wastes from Rahr Malting Company, which was subsequently connected to the system in 1967. — The River District Trunk Sewer runs parallel with and is directly south of the Minnesota River. In several areas, the trunk sewer comes within 30 feet of the river. The 1974 Report on Sanitary Sewer Capacity states that segments of the River District Trunk — Sewer were installed in bedrock below the water table. 3.2 Minnesota River Stages — MWCC records indicate that the flow at Lift Station L-16 increases when the stage of the Minnesota River increases. Based on this observation, it is probable that the stage of the Minnesota River has an impact on the I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer. Table 1 shows some of the highest river stages recorded at Shakopee. Figure 2 shows the river stages during March and the first half of April, 1992, a more typical spring river stage occurrence. The River District Trunk Sewer was televised and analyzed for I/I over this same period, so the river stage was monitored closely during this time. All information on river stage was obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers. The Corps has records dating back to 1939. Previously, they had a gaging station at Shakopee which was located downstream of the T.H. 169 bridge. However, that gage was subsequently discontinued. Levels at Shakopee now must be interpolated using the USGS Jordan Gage and the Corps' Savage Gage at Port Cargill. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 6 r" may-�---— 1 '_\ ( ri / moi' I { / -f C /!/;:: '�-,) / f : , ^err.• f / /%/ / rf t' fI / / 1 1 1 ;I H I / Lf ;;1 Qwi- < ) \-77./- 7 i•-• 0 \ 1 .J 1 ( • 1 I - r / \.J / -0, 5W. o<„o 4 I r I I ' t • t Q �3� II= - / ,�_ w cn ,,_, o I t • t ' ooi j Biu ,� /1 I —� 1 1 • �: / 1 I w �; k,--,, i ' `� I I moo _ I t ' \ / 1 I Z m ' a= N ” Ii f , 1 I 0 1 . $ Vc In J I• -s j f 5-16''I k s h L� o EKEEHWt /' . 0 r! f z Io 1 1 1 ' - = 14 I— t /L . / tn o j / �\ I g 4111161V 17,7 1 7 W vi L._J i c~i�W \— �� .._., �',r - r c-_', r FY ` 1 %" •► � I 4 f-I--—— cn N /�:~moi " `s 1 I \ ' r" / I \ r • . t-; I i-- i! % ---. F 411•I 141 I t, ..-."— i ^ \.., i IN ,...1 1._ i v a to z_~ 0 P; iitSHill' 1 I t i\ <0� WI fi Q \ g V' \ \ 1 r I ti ✓ \ I moa \ \ r 1 N 1 E*1 yt I j - __._,,_---d 1 C6-f.Z-Z OAT L003940Z 950Zei 9a- TABLE 1 Reference Stages of Minnesota River At Shakopee Approximate Maximum Elevation Year AMSL 1952 717 1965 722 1969 720 1986 711 1992 707 1993 718 I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 8 I , T c Inco o m CO — C) - m w � c0 0 > ct3 c C. W Q ) . m E w ._ ca( o N > o N p O O E0 & N Jc40cz a 0 5 C7 U o c d m o_as >. — Q c 812 E o _6-9, Q _ U — 0 o 0 0 0 Z 0 Ni 0 (1) O Q) N L2. ' 0 as L rca N i.. O N CC C) N (l r O cf)O> 'a)1.. Q. N 2 T U ca CO T CC < C 1 _ U r-- " O g O L3) (Z ry \ , , .- T CG / CJ N Cl.) L CI O ' N4,1";o:, CT ..-- c.O In O LC) O In 0 0 0 0) O N- N- N N (0 1SLNV laazI u! uoiuena13 JeA!H elosauuuj to e6els 3.3 MWCC Lift Station L-16 MWCC Lift Station L-16 is located on the east end of the River District Trunk Sewer. This lift station has been the subject of recent study by the MWCC. In 1992, the MWCC completed a study entitled "Shakopee Lift Station Facility Plan." The study indicated that the design capacity of L-16, as well as the River District Trunk Sewer, had been routinely exceeded during periods of peak I/I flows caused by wet weather in conjunction with periods of peak production by Rahr Malting. Because of this fact, the Facility Plan recommended the construction of a new submersible lift station at the site which would increase the rated capacity of the lift station from 2500 gallons per minute (gpm) to 3700 gpm. The River District Trunk Sewer is the largest of the two trunk sewers which make up the total flow to Lift Station L-16. The other trunk sewer is a 12-inch diameter main which serves the East District and is located further to the south away from the river. Because the lift station takes flow from both directions, MWCC pumping records could not be _ used to directly measure flows in the River District Trunk Sewer. However, MWCC records for Lift Station L-16 were analyzed and it was found that peak flows at the lift station closely coincided with peaks in the stage of the Minnesota River. During the peak of flooding in 1993, the 3700 gpm rated capacity for the proposed lift station was exceeded. The MWCC used portable pumps to supplement the inplace pumps to keep the lift station from flooding. The combined pumping rate when all pumps were operating was 4100 gpm. This probably indicates that the River District Trunk Sewer and lower portions of the East District Trunk Sewer delivered significantly greater amounts of I/I to L-16 due to the surcharging of the sewers and manholes. This situation probably also occurred in 1965 and 1969, but no such records were available. This caused the MWCC to reconsider the rated capacity for the proposed lift station. Either the rated capacity needs to be increased or the excessive I/I as experienced in 1993 needs to be removed from the system. 3.4 Rahr Malting Rahr Malting's facility is located near the west end of the River District Trunk Sewer. Rahr Malting's flow is a major component of the flow in the River District Trunk Sewer. For this reason, the River District Trunk Sewer televising and flow testing work which was completed in March and April of 1992 had to coincide with periods of low flow from Rahr Malting. This made the calculation of a base flow difficult since Rahr discharges almost continuously and at different rates during different parts of the day. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 10 aSrd ulosauutysi `aadoxegS "um JamaS kre1UueS anIsuagaIduio3 io3 ,CpnUS UI -Om si .Ianu uagM (iiETaads° `i/i of aiqmaadsns Ximinotii d act o2 uMouN st Jamas Nunl j 2ap2Sj Jana au -13!.11SJ .Tanta ag1 42 M Alanis1110X0 Tap ampdn sigh m41 paisanbal jjeis -Ta `.(4)n2S I/I Z86T aq2 Jo s8u!pu!J age puE ssa.i2ord slap uo paseg •pa1aauuoasip uaaq anvil Cola `sdumd duras `s.Iapuai joo.i •8•a) uuaisifs JOMOS£riiugs am of suopoauuoa iadoidUll iCuEui `uopIppu uI •sioafoid iaw qmM _ uoUaunfuoa uI paiaru1suoaaI uaaq anE4 sou!' .TOMOS £.IE2TUts Jam ag1 Jo °tilos •aui2sta Jam jo Auuui paoEldai osis sug puu saloguuW JOMOS A.In44UES Mau HE uo saioqpiold paiEaauoa g1IM &MMOO aioqutUI $u!sn uaaq SEq aado3IEgs Jo AID 0141 7861 00U!S imp m aadovgs inotOnaup Itatd2 0.10M golgM S.IOAOO aioquEui age Ut saioq mu! Mogul _ o� painQUUE S M i/i ag1 Jo Isoul inq i/i ptq siopisip Jamp •iol.us!Q .Tania aq1 sE UMOU)I SEM 1I 1SE0 alp UO 91-1 uoI1Els Ii7 JJMIAI ag1 01 Isom 0142 UO 2aa us sumpd 111013 a0Aia E2OS0UUtyAi 011 Buo[E pa2Eaol sum 1au1sip aq,i, •i/i OAISSOOX0 AlIET1ua1od pEq i(IIEnioE Oulu ag1 Jo ino lauIstp auo /quo imp pa1Eaipu! sisAitut aqs •131.UIstp g0E0 jo apEul act moo suouEniEna 2tg2 os siaiaU1 Moll kIEiodiva13o asn aq1 Sq sIau1sIp autu out pomp S M ulaisAs zamas kTEiiuts alp '..X. imp uI 111 anissaaxa Aiituuaiod pug aadorgs _ Jo AID age imp 1uaula2t2s iRaaua2 am apuul s!siCituy MoIJui put uogRniguI Z861 014.E asodind £'Z DDMIAT ag1 Aq pa.IEdaid sE £661 q$noag1 0661 .10J uosl.IEdWIop Mold XitpuoJi 'ZT 0661 `s041110Ed 101 M01sEM .I03 simePu 2S papuaultuoaaa 'T1 Z661 `UI 3o uolmn1Eng awn-aims/Cs DDMIN uo uogeuuoJul '01 Z66T `Jamas Num" 1al.us!Q .Tanta age u! Ili Jo Aprils 3i.uormoion13 '6 _ Z661 `.IaMaS 3111111,1, 101.11S1CI .Tania JO oapiA/s2o-I uouaadsui Al •8 LL6T `Jamas luau, 10!.us1Q .Tanta JO sOO-i uoIaadsui A,i, •L Z66I `91-'I uoi1t1s 13i-i .IoJ sp1oaaa Mo1d p3My4 •9 £661 `astqumci Ula2s,(8 JaMas £IE2!Uts 2uusprg aadorg5 3O A1tp 'S Z66T `s1aaut2ug JO thop OCULI\ 111013 SAEMS .Tanta E1osauu!J •b 2661 `mid '21l10E3 U011 2S 417 aado)lEgS '£ 17L61 `iiodaa A1toEdtp .I0M05 klt1iutS 'Z Z861 `SISXitUy mogul pue uoUE.ui!Jui •1 :2u!Mollo3 alp apnput a2Epdn sigh jo uout.zmdaid age ul pasn saa tnosa1 ata saainosag Z•Z 'APniS (I/I) moggul Plm uopaui?3UI Z861 age alEpdn o1 SEM dSSD alp u! papnpu! SEM 14014M s7IsE1 042 Jo aup '(dss3) Livid tomos A.IE2IUEs anisuaga.Idulo3 E aJEda.Id oI (Has) 'DUI uos?.IaupuaH Uo!itg 1IO4S pa2aalas `002UUlato3 uouaalas IuE2insuop age 3o uoI2Epuauuruoaa1 am uo `liaunop AID aado?.imis 0142 '1661 `OZ lsn2nV up uol3ezuogJn' FZ uownpoJJul z uopaas Section 4 Approach 4.1 Condition of River District Trunk Sewer Part of the scope for this study was to determine the condition of the River District Trunk Sewer so that improvement alternatives could be evaluated. The River District Trunk Sewer had been televised in 1977 by Solidification, Inc. The television inspection logs from 1977 are included in the Appendix of this report. However, a video tape of the 1977 televising was never saved. Therefore, detailed information on the location, size, and condition of leaks was not available. The City recognized the value of having a current video tape of the sewer, and decided to have the River District Trunk Sewer retelevised in 1992. Solidification, Inc. was hired to complete the televising work based on their previous experience with this particular _ sewer. The television inspection logs of the 1992 televising are also included in the Appendix of this report. 4.2 Measuring I/1 Rates Several alternative methods of measuring I/I were considered for this study. The method used in the 1982 Study involved the installation of temporary flow meters to measure flows in both the dry weather and wet weather periods. The measured flows were then compared to theoretical flows which had been calculated from water usage records. That portion of the measured flow that was larger than the theoretical flow was considered to be I/I. This is not an actual measurement of I/I but is more of an approximation. However, it is a good way to estimate I/I for larger segments of a collection system. A more direct and accurate way to measure I/I in a pipe is to measure the flow at each end of a segment. The unsubstantiated increase in flow between the end points is considered I/I. Flow inputs between the two end points need to be either plugged or measured at the point where they enter the line. This method is normally used during wet weather periods and is typically done during the night when sewer services are not being used and laterals can be plugged without causing significant backups. The latter method was chosen for this study. The cost and accuracy of various flow measuring devices were compared (e.g. V-notch weirs, Parshall flumes, ultrasonic depth measuring devices, etc.) and it was determined that the fluorescent dye procedure (fluorometrics) was the preferred method of flow measurement. The determination of the flow rates by a fluorescent dye analysis is based on the principle of conservation of mass. A dye solution of known concentration (Ci) is injected at a constant rate (Qi) upstream of the monitoring locations. Flow rates are determined at each monitoring point by analyzing wastewater samples for dye concentration (Cs) and calculating flow rates via the equation (Qi)(Ci) = (Qs)(Cs). I11 Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 11 Using this method, the River District Trunk Sewer was analyzed for I/I on March 22, 1992. Pace Laboratories (SEC Donohue) was contracted to do the testing because of their extensive background with fluorometrics. A report prepared by Pace Laboratories is included in the Appendix. 43 Evaluation of Alternatives The next step in the process was to evaluate the suitability of various improvement alternatives for the River District Trunk Sewer. Reconstruction, lining, chemical sealing, and no-improvement options were reviewed. Reconstruction and lining were considered — permanent solutions, while chemical sealing was considered a temporary solution. The costs of the alternatives were compared over a 20-year period using 8% interest. — A 20-year period coincides with the design life of the proposed new lift station and the probable remaining life in the River District Trunk Sewer (50 years total). The result of this comparison is given in Section 7, and the detailed cost estimates can be found in — the Appendix. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 12 Section 5 Results 5.1 River District Trunk Sewer Televising The televising was done on March 23, April 1, April 2, April 6, and April 8 of 1992. Televising was intended to be completed coincident with the springtime peak river level — so that leaks due to the high river level could be detected on the video. Televising would have been done on the day that the river reached its peak (March 11, 1992) except that the televising crew could not access the manholes due to surcharged flow conditions. Even during the periods of lowest discharge from Rahr Malting, the sewer remained in a surcharged condition between March 11, 1992 and March 22, 1992. As the river began to drop, flows subsided enough to allow the crews to obtain access to the main on March 23, 1992. Figure 3 is a graphical summary of the 1992 televising information obtained on the River — District Trunk Sewer. The following information is shown in Figure 3: _ • Service locations • City's manhole number • Televising manhole number • Areas where the mains had settled and were somewhat below the original — grade (camera partially submerged) • Areas where the mains had settled extensively (camera completed submerged) — • The manhole rim and pipe invert profiles as shown on construction record drawings • The elevation of the river on the day that the televising took place for — each particular reach of the main • Locations of active leaks that could be detected from the TV video The televising indicated that the structural characteristics of the pipe were surprisingly good. The problems occurred at the joints. Many of the joints had settled or opened allowing roots to penetrate the main. The main had settled significantly in some areas, — and joints had become badly offset. Some of the service taps were protruding or full of roots. Many of the reaches contained several inches of sediment and/or rocks up to five inches in diameter. Overall, the tape showed a high amount of standing water in the main. The televising records showed that some reaches contained grease, calcium, and detergent build-ups on the inner walls of the main. — Most of the leaks which were observed in the main were located east of the T.H. 169 bridge. This could have been due to the stage of the river being at or above the main on the days that the easterly end of the River District Trunk Sewer was televised. The — absence of leaks observed on the west end of the River District Trunk Sewer could have been because the river was below the main on the days that the westerly end was televised. Some of the heavy leaks were estimated to be flowing at up to 5gpm. (See photos 9 and 10 in the back of the 1992 televising report, Appendix A3.) I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 13 5.2 Fluorometric Flow Analysis The flow testing was performed during low flow conditions in the early morning hours of March 22, 1992. The flow testing was originally scheduled to coincide with the peak river stage which occurred on March 11, 1992, but the surcharged conditions prevented manhole access. A detailed description of the flow testing is given in the Appendix. A brief summary of the results is provided in Table 2. TABLE 2 Results of March 22, 1992, Flow Testing* s � NPR From To Distance Pipe Size UI Velocity Capacity Manhois Manbeie (fest) (Inches) (glad/in/mi) (fUeec) UI(efe) (cfs) 9 I/I 3 8 1149 15 1500 1.13 .0076 2.76 0.3 (RD44) (RD35) 12 25 2681 18 3608 0.73 .0510 3.65 . 1.4 (RD25) (R012) 25 37 3999 21 3006 1.21 .0740 4.21 1.8 (RD12) (ED01) - — - I •� _. �. t �. "The section between manhole 8 and manhole 12 was excluded from the study due to unpredictable flow inputs from Rahr Malting and inaccessible manhole locations. The following observations were made during the fluorometric flow analysis: • The measured I/I ranged from 1500 to 3608 gpd/in/mi. These rates are excessive considering that Ten States Standards recommends a maximum allowable infiltration rate of 200 gpd/in/mi for new construction and many municipal codes limit the acceptable infiltration rate to 100 gpd/in/mi for new construction. The USEPA's 1980 guideline was 1500 gpd/in/mi for determining whether or not a community had potentially excessive I/I. • The average measured flow velocity ranged from 0.73 to 1.21 fps with the pipe flowing less than half full during low flow hours. These values are low and indicate that an accumulation of solids will continue to occur when the pipe is flowing less than half full. However, a cleansing velocity of greater than 2.0 fps is expected to occur daily minimizing additional sediment buildup. • Several inches of accumulated solids were observed within all manholes which were entered. • Surcharged flow conditions were observed in manhole 2(WD45R) approximately 1000 feet upstream of the Rahr Malting discharge input under normal operation of Rahr Malting. This implies that Rahr's discharge may be backing up the line. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 15 • Significant inflow was observed in manhole 25 (RD12) through several holes on the west side of the manhole just above the crown of the upstream pipe. • Figure 3 of the fluorometrics report showed an increase in flow rate from the start of testing for Section 1. This testing occurred immediately after Rahr Malting's discharge ended. The increase in flow rate suggests that infiltration may be suppressed when Rahr Malting is discharging into the River District Trunk Sewer. 5.3 Comparison of I/I Rates The 1982 I/I Study indicated that the peak seven day I/I period in the River District occurred between May 18, 1982, and May 24, 1982. The average I/I rate over this period was measured to be 4860 gpd/in/mi. This same report estimated that the maximum peak seven day I/I rate occurred between August 30, 1979, and September 5, 1979, with an average I/I rate of about 5855 gpd/in/mi. In contrast, the maximum I/I rate measured on March 22, 1992, was 3608 gpd/in/mi between manholes 12 (RD25) and 25 (RD12). The difference in I/I between the three time periods listed above could be due to the different river stages and/or the rehabilitation work that was done by the City since 1979. Table 3 lists the river stages and I/I rates for the various time periods discussed above. TABLE 3 Minnesota River Stages and I/I Rates Stage of Approximate Minnesota River I/I Rate Date at Shakopee (gpd/in/mi) September 3, 1979 706.0 58551 May 21, 1982 697.1 48602 March 22, 1992 704.2 36083 'Estimated in 1982 I/I Study. 2Measured in 1982 I/I Study. 3Measured in 1993 Update of I/I Study. 5.4 MWCC System-wide Evaluation of I/I During 1991 and 1992, the MWCC conducted a system-wide evaluation of I/I in the Metropolitan Disposal System. Approximate I/I figures for each community were estimated based on metering information obtained by the MWCC for the years of 1989 and 1990. The results of the MWCC study indicated that Shakopee had a relatively low peak ratio during 1989 and 1990. The peak ratio was defined as the average of the three highest peak day flows divided by the average daily flow. The peak ratio was a measure of each community's susceptibility to I/I. Shakopee's peak ratio was in the 1.0 - 1.5 range, which I/1 Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 16 was relatively low compared to adjacent communities such as Eden Prairie, which had a peak ratio in the range of 2.5 - 3.0. The MWCC estimated that the average ground water infiltration during 1989 and 1990 was about 739 gpd/in/mi in sewer mains owned by the City of Shakopee. The average of the three highest rainfall dependent I/I peaks during 1989 and 1990 was about 1580 gpd/in/mi in sewer mains owned by the City of Shakopee. These I/I Rates were lower than the instantaneous I/I rates measured by the fluorometric analysis on the River District Trunk Sewer. This is because the MWCC I/I rates were average rates for all sewer mains owned by the City of Shakopee, which would include new (tight) mains and mains above the water table. This suggests that Shakopee's citywide I/I rate is relatively low and the City's past efforts to reduce I/I have been beneficial. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 17 Section 6 Improvement Alternatives 6.1 General The results of the televising and the fluorometric flow analysis show that the River District Trunk Sewer is in need of improvement if the I/I rate is to be reduced to a level which is below the recommended allowable I/I rate. A portion of the East District Trunk Sewer was added to the improvement alternatives. This is due to the high I/I experienced in 1993 compared to 1992. Although the East District sewer system in general is not suspect, the East District Trunk Sewer immediately east of L-16 experienced the same relative flood levels as the River District Trunk Sewer in a year having higher than normal I/I. Reconstruction, lining, chemical sealing, and the no- improvement options were analyzed to determine their suitability for this application. A description of each alternative is given in this section. Estimated costs are given in Section 7. 6.2 Reconstruction Under this alternative, the River District Trunk Sewer would be removed and replaced from manhole 1 (WD01) to manhole 37 (ED01). In addition, 810 feet of the East District Trunk Sewer immediately east of L-16 would be reconstructed. The total length of reconstruction would be 9910 feet. The pipe sizes and grades would be the same as the original installation, except for the segment from manhole 25 (RD12) to manhole 37 (ED01). This segment would be increased in size from a 21" diameter to a 24" diameter to accommodate the projected ultimate peak flow as identified in the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan without surcharging. This alternative would include a new jacked crossing under the old T.H. 169 bridge. Bypass pumping would be required during the entire reconstruction. 63 Polyethylene Liner Several different types of liners were investigated for the River District Trunk Sewer. A "U-Liner" (tight fitting polyethylene liner) was determined to be unsuitable for portions of the River District Trunk Sewer because it is only manufactured in sizes up to 15" in diameter. It is also more expensive than other liners, so its use is generally restricted to locations where the pipe diameter decrease must be minimized for capacity -- reasons. Slip lining using a loose fitting, high density polyethylene pipe has some potential for this type of an application. Slip lining would involve excavating insertion pits at approximately 800-foot intervals and pulling an undersized liner through the existing main. Bypass pumping and cleaning of the main would be necessary for the slip lining procedure. Excavation of service wyes would also be necessary to make the service connections. The wall thickness of the liner is designed to withstand hydrostatic pressure due to rising river levels and internal pressure under surcharged conditions. The roughness coefficient of the liner is less than that of concrete pipe, which tends to increase the capacity of the I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 18 pipe. However, installation of a loose fitting liner significantly decreases the diameter of the pipe which decreases the capacity. The result is a net reduction in the capacity. The segment of the River District Trunk Sewer located in Huber Park between the old T.H. 169 bridge and Market Street (from manhole 20 to manhole 28 on Figure 3) has settled significantly. Slip lining of this segment would not solve the problem of low velocities and excessive deposition of solids. In addition, slip lining the remainder of the River District Trunk Sewer would increase surcharging of the pipe to an unacceptable level. The East District Trunk Sewer can have no reduction in capacity. Therefore, the cost estimates have been based on reconstruction east of the old T.H.169 bridge with slip lining limited to west of the bridge. 6.4 Polyester Resin Impregnated Liner Polyester resin impregnated liner is another type of pipe liner that is sometimes used in applications such as this. Insituform is the most widely used polyester resin impregnated — liner. The impregnated liner material is fed into the main through the manholes, forced into the pipe under pressure, and is chemically bonded to the interior of the pipe through an inversion process. Insertion pits are not required. Prior to installation of the liner, the main is cleaned and televised to locate service locations. After installation of the liner, a remote controlled cutter is sent through the pipe to cut holes in the liner at the service locations. Flow capacity after installation may be as good or better than the original capacity. Due to the settlement in Huber Park, the cost estimates have been based on the reconstruction of the segment located in Huber Park, rather than lining. 6.5 Chemical Sealing Chemical joint repair is accomplished from the inside of the pipe by locating the deteriorated area via a TV camera and pumping a chemical grout into the area to seal off any leakage. The sealed leak is then pressure tested. Pipe cleaning and bypass pumping is necessary during the process. The advantages to chemical sealing are the relatively low cost and the fact that no excavation is necessary to complete the chemical sealing. One of the disadvantages to chemical sealing is that roots and hydrostatic pressure may eventually push the chemical sealant back into the pipe over a period of time. Although there are documented cases where certain types of chemical sealing have been in place over 20 years without the need for repair, the cost comparisons in this study include the cost of a replacement sealing at 10 years, and an extra televising inspection at 10 years, so as to be more comparable in value to the other alternatives. Other disadvantages are that it is sometimes difficult to obtain a satisfactory pressure test, and the cost of chemical sealing is difficult to estimate prior to actually doing the work. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Page 19 Shakopee, Minnesota In the pipe rehabilitation industry, chemical sealing is typically thought of as a temporary alternative solution to the problem. Since it is not a permanent solution like reconstruction or lining, it is not considered equal to these alternatives. For this reason, it was not felt necessary to include the cost for reconstruction through Huber Park with the chemical sealing alternative. 6.6 No Improvement The "no improvement" alternative consists of paying the cost for the treatment of I/I. According to the MWCC, the average sewage treatment cost for all users in 1992 was - $1155 per million gallons of sewage. This cost is expected to increase annually by 1-2% over and above the cost of inflation. Table 4 shows that the approximate volume of I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer and 810 feet of the East District Trunk Sewer in the spring of 1992 was 3.32 million gallons (MG). Based on information received from the Army Corps of Engineers, it is not - unusual to expect a fall peak in the Minnesota River level similar to the spring peak level. Assuming a similar peak in the fall, the total volume of I/I from the spring and fall peaks would be approximately 6.64 MG. Using a factor of 1.5 to account for additional - I/I throughout the rest of the year, or for higher I/I rates when the river level is higher than when measured, the total estimated volume of I/I that would be generated in a typical year would be about 10 MG. Using the sewage treatment cost of$1155 per MG, - an estimated $12,000 would be spent by the City of Shakopee to treat I/I in a typical year. TABLE 4 Volume of I/I in Spring of 1992 Measured Numbed' I/I Rate Reach of River March, High Low Average of Days River Volume of I/I, District Trunk 1992 Invert Invert Invert was Within 1' Spring, 1992 Sewer (GPM) Elevation Elevation Elevation of Pipe Invert (MG) RD 45 to RD 44 1.2' 708.09 707.13 707.61 2 0.0035 RD 44 to RD 28 3.4 707.13 704.27 705.70 15 0.0734 - RD 28 to RD 25 9.7' 704.27 703.35 704.16 20 0.2794 RD 25 to RD 12 22.9 703.35 700.05 701.70 28 0.9233 RD 12 to ED 01 33.2 699.80 696.18 697.99 39 1.8645 ED01 to ED05 4.5' 706.22 697.70 701.96 27 0.1750 Approximate Total Volume I/I = 3.32 MG 1I/I was not measured on these segments, but was estimated using I/I rates measured on adjacent segments. '" 2Assumes a one foot gradient on water table from trunk sewer location towards river. 3Based on river stage shown in Figure 2. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Page 20 Shakopee, Minnesota _ Table 4 does not include I/I as may occur periodically as did in 1993. Major flood levels are listed in Table 1 along with the flood level for 1992 when fluorometric measurements were made on the River District Trunk Sewer. Historical information indicates the major floods occur on average about every 10 years. Figure 4 is a copy of the Shakopee Monthly Flow Comparison for the years 1990 through 1993 as provided by the MWCC, modified by SEH to indicate average monthly flow (1990 through 1992) and excess flow during 1993. Individual numbers are in total sewage flow in million gallons from the City of Shakopee by month. The excess flow identified is all presumed to be I/I, occurring only in the River District and East District Trunk Sewers as they are the only pipes subject to high river levels. A total of 100 million gallons per year was determined to be representative of excess I/I during a major flood occurring about every 10 years. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 21 L •— CV CO 0 0) 0)0) 0) 0 Lr- T" r r O ! 0 4L `-• O 1 L II ' . . . . . . • , • . 0 co cm 0) to , — . , a) r 2 N O I . .0 n c0 N n • . > to O o- . . z O N. . , 1 U t� c0 N CO N O O N d' co (Ni O I - a) 16 . • : l ' : cfl c0 a) a.. . • Q O O co co _ E . N h Cfl M N N • . . . . . . , . . • a0 f ; ; . I� M co t0 4) to M = r c0 N O , Ii 0 0 . 44 • ,— .. i , ; • . • Q co h O -----, - , : , : • — . vi- 0 cs, rn C•1 h n N ti I� 1 � O • r —�• . C O N M M in M D to c0 g c0 pi -� co CO r N N N r ›N . „ • . 2 N CO Cif) •4••r C , T- In CO d' • I^� G . , ij : . • .' � LO O t0 G 1�. r CO N O I N 4 N ,— I . % (0 O t.0 (fl c0 • • i C 0) 0) 0) L . . as ~ M 8 (Ni O I . '7 CO N co 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO0) 0) 0)�. �' N OCA CG '.fi N 0) r r T- N.'''. r r 1- I L may. N (Nn }1 >( x FIGURE 4ow Z0) n Page 22 �v1 0, Section 7 Cost of Alternatives _ 7.1 Cost Summary Table 5 gives a cost summary of the improvement alternatives. The detailed cost _ estimates (initial cost) are found in the Appendix of this report. In the calculation of present worth and equivalent annual cost, routine inspection and cleaning costs were not included if they were common to all alternatives. TABLE 5 Cost Summary of Improvement Alternatives' Alternative Present Worth2 Equivalent Annual Cost' Initial Cost Reconstruction $642,060 $65,425 $975,000 Polyethylene Liner3 $548,000 $55,840 $832,100 — Impregnated Liner` $757,560 $77,200 $1,150,400 Chemical Sealing $550,000 $56,040 $331,400 Treat I/I $238,120 $24,265 $0 1A11 costs include 10% contingencies and 25% overhead. 'Present worth and equivalent annual cost based on 20-year period and 8% interest for all alternatives. 3lncludes reconstruction east of old T.H.169 bridge. 4Includes reconstruction through Huber Park. 7.2 Comparison of Alternatives Treating I/I appears to have a lower equivalent annual cost than the improvement alternatives. However, treating the I/I is not a solution to the problem, and I/I will probably continue to increase over time. A combination of slip lining with a loose fitting polyethylene liner and reconstruction is the next most cost effective of the remaining alternatives. The disadvantage to slip lining is the estimated capacity reduction which would result in a surcharged condition of approximately 3.7 feet over the top of the pipe at the most critical location, manhole RD35. Although the elevations of basements along the River District Trunk Sewer are unknown at this time, it is possible that this amount of surcharging would be unacceptable due to the possibility of flooding basements. Chemical sealing is about as cost effective as the polyethylene liner. In the past, chemical sealing has not usually been considered a permanent solution to extensive infiltration problems. However,with some installations now being in place over 20 years, this may be a good interim solution that could be considered. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 23 The next most cost effective alternative would be total reconstruction. One of the advantages of reconstruction would be the opportunity to increase the size of the River District Trunk Sewer between manhole 25 (RD12) and manhole 37 (ED01) to accommodate the projected ultimate peak flow without any surcharging. Finally, the polyester resin impregnated liner appears to be the most expensive alternative. This type of liner is best suited for large sewer mains having few services and located in an area where there are significant restoration costs associated with reconstruction. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Page 24 Shakopee, Minnesota APPENDIX Al COST ESTIMATES FOR IMPROVEMENT ALTERNATIVES Shakopee, Minnesota -" Present Worth and Equivalent Annual Cost of Alternatives for River District Trunk Sewer and 810 Feet of East District Trunk Sewer I. Present worth and equivalent annual cost calculations were based on a 20-year life analysis and 8% -- interest. Salvage value of 30 years was assumed at the end of the 20-year period for the reconstruction, polyethylene liner/reconstruction, and polyester resin impregnated liner options. — II. Reconstruction, lining, and chemical sealing cost calculations assumed that all I/I was removed due to the improvement. III. Costs that would be common to all alternatives were not included in the analysis: A. Manual inspection every 5 years at $1,000/inspection. B. Thorough cleaning at 10 years at $12,000/cleaning. IV. Future costs were calculated assuming a 5% construction cost inflation rate. — V. Reconstruction A. The estimated cost to reconstruct the pipe is $975,000. — B. After 20 years, the salvage value is the 30 years of life left in the pipe, or 60%. C. Present worth = $975,000 - [975,000 (F/P, 5%, 20) x .60 x (P/F, 8%, 20)] = $975,000 - [975,000 (2.6533) x .60 x (.2145)] = $642,060 D. Equivalent annual cost = $642,060 (A/P, 8%, 20) = 642,060 (.1019) = $65,425 VI. Polyethylene Liner A. The estimated cost of the polyethylene liner/reconstruction alternative is $832,100. B. After 20 years, the salvage value is the 30 years of life left in the pipe, or 60%. C. Present worth = $832,100 - [832,100 (F/P, 5%, 20) x .60 x (P/F, 8%, 20)1 = $832,100 - [832,100 (2.6533) x .60 x (.2145)] = $547,955 D. Equivalent annual cost = $547,955 (A/P, 8%, 20) = 547,955 (.1019) = $55,840 VII. Polyester Resin Impregnated Liner — A. The estimated cost to put a polyester resin impregnated liner in the pipe is $1,150,400. B. After 20 years, the salvage value is the 30 years of life left in the pipe, or 60%. C. Present worth = $1,150,400 - [1,150,400 (F/P, 5%, 20) x .60 x (P/F, 8%, 20)] = $1,150,400 - [1,150,400 (2.6533) x .60 x (.2145)] = $757,560 D. Equivalent annual cost = $757,560 (A/P, 8%, 20) = 757,560 (.1019) = $77,195 VIII. Chemical Sealing A. The estimated cost to chemically seal the pipe is$283,130 and to seal the manholes is$48,270, for a total of$331,400. B. Assume televising at 10 years at $6,500/televising. C. Assume resealing pipe is required at 10 years; manholes will not need resealing. D. Present worth = $331,400 + 6,500 (F/P, 5%, 10) (P/F, 8%, 10) + 283,130 (F/P, 5%, 10) (P/F, 8%, 10) = $331,400 + 6,500 (1.6289) (.4632) + 283,130 (1.6289) (.4632) = $549,930 E. Equivalent annual cost = $549,930 (A/P, 8%, 20) = 549,930 (.1019) = $56,040 IX. Treat I/I A. The estimated cost for treating 10 MG of I/I in a typical year at $1155/MG is $11,550 per year. B. Based on information provided by the MWCC, the cost of sewage treatment is expected to increase by about 1-2% per year over the rate of inflation. This equates to an average increase of about $29 per year per million gallons of sewage, or $290 per year for the estimated 10 million gallons of I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer in a typical year. C. Assume that the main will need to be spot repaired on an emergency basis every 5 years at $5,500, starting at year 5. D. Assume televising at 10 years at $6,500/televising. E. The average major flood interval has been about every 10 years. 1993 is used as the typical flood. It produced an excess of about 100 MG of I/I at a cost to the City of $1155/MG, or $115,500 per flood. F. Present worth = $11,550 (P/A, 8%, 20) + 290 (P/G, 8%, 20) + 5,500 (F/P, 5%,5) (P/F, 8%, 5) + 5,500 (F/P, 5%, 10) (P/F, 8%, 10) + 5,500 (F/P, 5%, 15) (P/F, 8%, 15) + 6,500 (F/P, 5%, 10) (P/F, 8%, 10) + 115,500 (P/F, 8%, 9) + (29 x 100) (F/P, 2%, 9) (P/F, 8%,9) + 115,500 (P/F, 8%, 19) + (29 x 100) (F/P, 2%, 19) (P/F, 8%, 9) = $11,550 (9.8181) + 290 (69.0898) + 5,500 (1.2763) (.6806) + 5,500 (1.6289) (.4632) + 5,500 (2.0789) (.3152) + 6,500 (1.6289) (.4632) + 115,500 ( .5002) + 2900 (1.1951) (.5002) + $115,500 (.2317) + 2900 (1.4568) (.2317) = $238,120 G. Equivalent annual cost = $238,120 (A/P, 8%, 20) = 238,120 (.1019) = $24,265 Shakopee, Minnesota _ Reconstruction of River District Trunk Sewer and 810 Feet of East District Trunk Sewer - Preliminary Cost Estimate Unit Total Description Unit Qty. Price Price - Mobilization L.S. 1 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 Temporary Bypass Pumping L.S. 1 33,000.00 33,000.00 Remove Sanitary Sewer L.F. 9,910 5.00 49,550.00 - Remove Sanitary Manhole Each 39 100.00 3,900.00 Temporary Fencing L.F. 9,910 1.50 14,865.00 Bale Checks Each 280 6.00 1,680.00 _ Clear and Grub Acre 8.2 3,000.00 24,600.00 Crushed Rock Pipe Foundation Ton 2,450 7.00 17,150.00 Agg. Base, Cl. 5 C.Y. 210 16.00 3,360.00 Replacement Backfill Ton 2,450 4.00 9,800.00 Traffic Control L.S. 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 Jack-Bore 18" Carrier in 30" Casing L.F. 130 250.00 32,500.00 2" Bituminous Restoration S.Y. 856 6.00 5,136.00 - 12" RCP 0' - 10' Deep L.F. 480 23.00 11,040.00 12" RCP 10' - 15' Deep L.F. 180 28.00 5,040.00 12" RCP 15' - 20' Deep L.F. 150 33.00 4,950.00 - 15" RCP 0' - 10' Deep L.F. 1,130 25.00 28,250.00 15" RCP 10' - 15' Deep L.F. 470 29.00 13,630.00 18" RCP 0' - 10' Deep L.F. 3,091 26.00 80,366.00 18" RCP 10' - 15' Deep L.F. 790 30.00 23,700.00 24" RCP 0' - 10' Deep L.F. 2,209 32.00 70,688.00 24" RCP 10' - 15' Deep L.F. 660 38.00 25,080.00 24" RCP 15' - 20' Deep L.F. 750 44.00 33,000.00 Standard Manhole, 8' Depth Each 39 1,500.00 58,500.00 Excess Depth Standard Manhole L.F. 94 100.00 9,400.00 Temporary Barricades L.F. 48 28.00 1,344.00 -- 4" PVC Service Pipe L.F. 155 6.00 930.00 4" PVC Riser Pipe L.F. 40 12.00 480.00 Service Connection Each 31 100.00 3,100.00 - Silt Fence Preassembled L.F. 9,910 2.00 19,820.00 Salvaged Topsoil C.Y. 4,180 6.00 25,080.00 Sodding, Lawn Type S.Y. 21,506 2.00 43,012.00 Seeding Acre 3.7 250.00 925.00 Seed, Mixture 600 Lb. 250 6.00 1,500.00 Mulch Material, Type 1 Ton 7.4 170.00 1,258.00 Disk Anchoring Acre 3.7 85.00 316.00 - Wood Fiber Blanket S.Y. 12,000 2.50 30,000.00 Comm. Fertilizer Analysis 12-12-12 Lb. 380 1.00 380.00 Subtotal $709,330.00 10% Contingencies 70,670.00 Subtotal $780,000.00 - 25% Eng., Legal, Admin. 195 000.00 Total Estimate: $975,000.00 Shakopee, Minnesota - Polyethylene Liner of River District Trunk Sewer West of Huber Park With Reconstruction Through Huber Park to Lift Station and 810 Feet of East District Trunk Sewer Preliminary Cost Estimate Unit Total Description Unit Qty. Price Price Mobilization L.S. 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Cleaning and Polyethylene Liner L.F. 4,262 40.00 170,480.00 - Temporary Bypass Pumping L.S. 1 23,000.00 23,000.00 Remove Sanitary Sewer L.F. 5,644 5.00 28,220.00 Remove Sanitary Manhole Each 17 100.00 1,700.00 - Temporary Fencing L.F. 5,650 1.50 8,475.00 Bale Checks Each 96 6.00 576.00 Clear and Grub Acre 4.0 3,000.00 12,000.00 Crushed Rock Pipe Foundation Ton 1,620 7.00 11,340.00 Traffic Control L.S. 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 12" RCP 0' - 10' Deep L.F. 480 23.00 11,040.00 12" RCP 10' - 15' Deep L.F. 180 28.00 5,040.00 - 12" RCP 15' - 20' Deep L.F. 150 33.00 4,950.00 18" RCP 0'-10' Deep L.F. 748 26.00 19,448.00 18" RCP 10'-15' Deep L.F. 470 30.00 14,100.00 - 24" RCP 0'-10' Deep L.F. 2,178 32.00 69,696.00 24" RCP 10'-15' Deep L.F. 718 38.00 27,284.00 24" RCP 15'-20' Deep L.F. 724 44.00 31,856.00 Standard Manhole, 8' Depth Each 21 1,500.00 31,500.00 Excess Depth Standard Manhole L.F. 74 100.00 7,400.00 Manhole Sealing (Grout & Liner) Each 18 1,800.00 32,400.00 Temporary Barricades L.F. 32 28.00 896.00 - 4" PVC Service Pipe L.F. 155 6.00 930.00 4" PVC Riser Pipe L.F. 40 12.00 480.00 Service Connection Each 31 100.00 3,100.00 -- Connect to Existing Manhole Each 2 150.00 300.00 Silt Fence Preassembled L.F. 5,650 2.00 11,300.00 Salvaged Topsoil C.Y. 2,350 6.00 14,100.00 - 2" Bituminous Restoration S.Y. 1,535 6.00 9,210.00 Agg. Base, Cl. 5 C.Y. 380 16.00 6,080.00 Seeding Acre 4.7 250.00 1,175.00 Seed, Mixture 600 Lb. 350 6.00 2,100.00 Mulch Material, Type 1 Ton 9.4 170.00 1,598.00 Disk Anchoring Acre 4.7 85.00 400.00 Wood Fiber Blanket S.Y. 12,000 2.50 30,000.00 - Comm. Fertilizer Analysis 12-12-12 Lb. 480 1.00 480.00 Subtotal $605,154.00 - 10% Contingencies 60.526.00 Subtotal $665,680.00 25% Eng., Legal, Admin. 166 420.00 - Total Estimate: $832,100.00 _ Shakopee, Minnesota Polyester Resin Impregnated Liner of River District Trunk Sewer and 810 Feet of East District Trunk Sewer (With Reconstruction Through Huber Park) Preliminary Cost Estimate Unit Total Description Unit Qty. Price Price Mobilization L.S. 1 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 Cleaning and Impregnated Liner L.F. 7,544 80.00 603,520.00 -- Temporary Bypass Pumping L.S. 1 11,000.00 11,000.00 Remove Sanitary Sewer L.F. 2,362 5.00 11,810.00 Remove Sanitary Manhole Each 7 100.00 700.00 -- Temporary Fencing L.F. 2,366 1.50 3,549.00 Bale Checks Each 36 6.00 216.00 Clear and Grub Acre 2.0 3,000.00 6,000.00 __ Crushed Rock Pipe Foundation Ton 661 7.00 4,627.00 Traffic Control L.S. 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 18" RCP 0'-10' Deep L.F. 748 26.00 19,448.00 18" RCP 10'-15' Deep L.F. 470 30.00 14,100.00 - 24" RCP 0'-10' Deep L.F. 868 32.00 27,776.00 24" RCP 10'-15' Deep L.F. 220 38.00 8,360.00 24" RCP 15'-20' Deep L.F. 60 44.00 2,640.00 - Standard Manhole, 8' Depth Each 7 1,500.00 10,500.00 Excess Depth Standard Manhole L.F. 25 100.00 2,500.00 Manhole Sealing (Grout & Liner) Each 32 1,800.00 57,600.00 Temporary Barricades L.F. 32 28.00 896.00 Connect to Existing Manhole Each 2 150.00 300.00 Silt Fence Preassembled L.F. 2,366 2.00 4,732.00 Salvaged Topsoil C.Y. 1,010 6.00 6,060.00 - 2" Bituminous Restoration S.Y. 505 6.00 3,030.00 Agg. Base, Cl. 5 C.Y. 210 16.00 3,360.00 Seeding Acre 2.0 250.00 500.00 Seed, Mixture 600 Lb. 143 6.00 858.00 Mulch Material, Type 1 Ton 4 170.00 680.00 Disk Anchoring Acre 2.0 85.00 170.00 - Wood Fiber Blanket S.Y. 7,000 2.50 17,500.00 Comm. Fertilizer Analysis 12-12-12 Lb. 209 1.00 209.00 Subtotal $836,641.00 10% Contingencies 83.679.00 Subtotal $920,320.00 25% Eng., Legal, Admin. 230 080.00 Total Estimate: $1,150,400.00 _ Shakopee, Minnesota Chemical Sealing of River District Trunk Sewer and 810 Feet of East District Trunk Sewer Preliminary Cost Estimate Unit Total Description Unit Oty. Price Price Mobilization L.S. 1 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 Cleaning and Joint Sealing L.F. 9,910 18.00 178,380.00 Bypass Pumping L.S. 1 16,500.00 16,500.00 Manhole Sealing (Grout) Each 39 900.00 35,100.00 _ Subtotal $240,980.00 10% Contingencies 24,140.00 Subtotal $265,120.00 25% Eng., Legal, Admin. 66,280.00 "- Total Estimate: $331,400.00 APPENDIX A2 TV INSPECTION LOGS OF RIVER TRUNK SEWER, 1977 TV INSPECTION REPORT = SOLIDIFICATION, INC. !,' 620 Cottonwood LaneDATE• Novctuber 1u, 1977 PAGE N0.'C4,z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of `,h ikopee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: A ON:FROM: right of w:ty ':nuth of river TO: LINE: SIZE: 15 Inches (dia.) ?��; Ft. (length) SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC y Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt X Other eJsement MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good _ Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped - Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo — M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. CO MH 75-90 Low pipe 1-2" log. 102 Off:;et joint 3/8- 1/T' side 113 Smn11 roots in .joint 1 908 Offset joint 3/8-1/2" side 313-323 Low pipe 1-2" 3% MH 3 Grade :end :.tructure good TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC, N�`o%r ,c',i 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: Nrvembor 16_ 1977 • PAGE NO. 1 — Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of ('h-konee ; PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: ...lute ��� ON: • ri„iit nr t• •y n :rh of '-ivor - FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 15 Inches (dia.) _iii Ft. (length) y SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss — Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor — ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt X Other easement MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical — X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream - -.•-- -----_.-_«...__.__..--.. ---.c--••——• llamm. Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. C t ' rut 3 12-2( Low nine 1-2” los. 80-1t14 Low nine 7_•2" 95 Heivv roots in taint 130-148 Low nine 2-3" low 1 ` 184 Heavy root: in joint i 7( 9 Light root:: in joint — 250:-'56 High length of pipe i t;6 MH 4 ` Lot of dirt iz bottom of pipe first 50 ft_ from MN 1_ i Grade margin:sl; :structure Rood. — I TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC, .0" 't�, 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE. Novemh:r 16, 1077 PAGE NO 3 a Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of ` akopee 1-� �' PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: s:nae � ON: right of way :south of river �i.� ,`f►� FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 15 Inches (dia.) _ 377 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay _ PVC Y Concrete Casc Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete - Asphalt X Other ea:;ewent MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair _ Poor TYPE .OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X _ Downstream Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS 1Ft, No. • 00 MI 4 12 Wiie joint 190 Light roots in joint (typical) - 4 202 Light root; in joint 230-23E Low pipe 1-2" low T 238 High joint • 288 Service R tap 5 310 Ro,:t: in joint 350• Loi: joint - 377 MH 5 Grade and :,tructure good. ` TV INSPECTION REPORT �� � SOLIDIFICATION, INC. »o`O c'P, 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: '1evt� r.:Uer l.f, 1q77 PAGE NO. 4 = Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Cit- of •'�• .!:_one — . PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: :.me ���,� ON: ri..-ht of tr:v • outh of river . FROM: TO: • •_ LINE: SIZE: 15 Inches (dia.) 91 Ft. (length) SANITARY DEPTH: Ft, PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss — Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt X Other easement — - MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical -- X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream - -- - -- =------:- --- _j Ft. Fr. - Film Photo M.H. REMARKS 1Ft. No. OC MF fir:.t 60 feet quite dirty; probably from w:iter brick up from — 11" line from Rah 1 - ---____1 - 92 MH 7 J - Grade and structure appear good; line dirty — 4 • - SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT `0 `4,` 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 16, 1977 PAGE NO. 5 M Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee ,.\\ PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: ;ami ON: right of way ::ouch of river Yom' FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: IS Inches (dia.) _113 Ft. ( length) X SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PTPE LENGTH Ft. STORM — AGE: New x Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: y Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete - Asphalt y Other easement MANHOLE CONDITION: Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical x Undeveloped • Other CAMERA DIRECTION: x Upstream Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. 00 MH 7 _ 09 Small roots in ioints 32 , Scall roots 62 Offset loint 1" tap 6 113 , MH 6 Grade and structure good 1 SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTIO.N REPOR1 «y° o' 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 17, 1977 PAGE NO. 6 — z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: riry of chikappp PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: sAme • ./( ON: right of way ,_Huth of river FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: lc Inches (dia.) 188 Ft. (length) X SANITARY I DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss — T ransite Other CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor — ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt x Other easement MANHOLE CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: .Industrial Residential Commerical — • X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream — Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS pFt. No. — 00 MH 6 83 Roots in joint _ 90 Wide joint OK 95 Broken bell grade OK 7 113 Roots in joint 8 125 Wide joint with roots 143 Wide joint with roots 188 MH 5 I Grade and structure good except as noted •• _ I TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 0 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 17, 1977 PAGE NO. 7 0 Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shikopee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same '017. 4 ON: right of way south of river VIII FROM: MH 8 TO: MH 9 LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 373 Ft. ( length) X . SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor — ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt X Other MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS iFt. No. 00 MH 8 55 I Service R — I 110-155 Low pipe 3-5" low 139 Camera under water 157 Service R debris at joint 163 Offset joint 204 Service R 9 273 Roots in joint 10 300 Service R 323 Offset joint 3/8-1/2" top 334 Low joint 373 MH 9 — Grade marginal; structure good. • SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT o•`O�t , 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 17. 1977 PAGE NO. 8 = Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: • City of Shakopee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: ::ame �•: ,V - ON: richt of way south of river • 11 FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 1R Inches (dia.) 377 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM _ AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete _ Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt X Other - .� MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential . Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream --- - — - --- --- sem- ---.---�--_Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS 1Ft. No. -- 00 00 MH 9 123 Service R tap 242 Service R tap protruding running 11 272 Service R protruding running 287 Offset joint 1" top/bottom 12 295-315 Low pipe 1-3" 307 Low joint 3" low 377 MH 10 Grade marginal -- structure good SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT N�°" C4, 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 14, 1977 PAGE NO, 9 Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee liww—;:f.,. . PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same �il ' ON: right of way south of river FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 116 Ft. ( length) X SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor — ROAD SURFACE: Gravel _ Concrete - Asphalt X Other MANHOLEI CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream _..-_ — Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. 00 MH 10 06 Service L 91 Small roots in joint 100-116 2-3" low 116 ME 11 Grade and structure good SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPOR1 N..`011 'C'►°s 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 14. 1977 PAGE NO, 10 — Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same • r. � ON: right of way south of river FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) — 271? Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM _ AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor — ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt X Other - • MANHOLE CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream -- Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. 00 MH 12 47 Roots in joint — 58 Roots in joint 91 Possibly protruding service L midway from joints 13 150 Badly offset joint upstream pipe about 1-2" drop 14 181 Offset joint 1/2-1" low uc. tream 262 Service 12:00 270 MH 11 Grade and structure marginal • SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTIO.N REPORT 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 15, 1977 PAGE NO. 11 b` 1 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee �'' PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same ON: right of way south of river 1 FROM: TO: _ LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) _378 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt X Other easement MANHOLE CONDITION: Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. I REMARKS ,Ft. No. _ - 00 MH 13 65-79 Low pipe 2-3" low 103 Offset joint 3/8-1/2" offset 105-116 2-3" low 178 Service entry L 258 Small roots in joint 303 Service entry 12:00 318 Roots in joint 15 330 Roots in joint 366 Light roots in joint 378 MH 12 Grade marginal structure good • SOLIDIFICATION, INC. • TV INSPECTION • REPOR`. ,co' 'C+ DATE• November 15, 1977 12 620 Cottonwood Lane PAGE N0• " Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee — �-' PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same ON: right of way south of river FROM: TO: — LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia;) 133 Ft. (length) X SANITARY l DEPTH: Ft, PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC --X— Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss — Transite _ Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt I X Other easement-- MANHOLE asement— MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical —�� Undeveloped - Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream .... -: - Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft, No. • 00 MH 13 —I 31 Small roots — 61 Offset joint 1/2" 70-85 Low pipe 2-3" low 133 MH 14 f • Grade marginal -- structure good _ • SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT o'%cot 'C',C • 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 15. 1977 PAGE NO. 13 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shokopee WPH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same " ON: right of way south of river FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 241 Ft. ( length) X SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC � Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss • Transite Other • CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete - Asphalt X Other easement MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream 777Fr.� Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. 00 MH 14 25 Offset joint 37 Roots in joint 53-65 Low 2-3" low 85 Offset joint small roots 103 Roots in joint • 130-140 Low pipe 1-2" -- 180-220 Low 3-4" 205 Offset joint 1/2" 241 MH 15 Grade marginal -- structure good Roots caught in camera - could not take pictures because of bright spot. MH 15 buried. TV INSPECTION -REPOR1 SOLIDIFICATION,_ INC. November 15 1977 14 ,cof `',off 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: • PAGE N0� — Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee �-.....iN PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same. ON: right of way south of river .<2.;:.\ • • FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 254 Ft. (length) X SANITARY 1 DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM _ AGE: New X Old 17 Years I TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss — Transite Other _ I CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt X Other MANHOLE CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped _ Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream - - _ _ tee, .._.. _ _._ .. __. — .____._.-_---_.-. . _.. _ . ,�_ � — Ft. Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS pFt. No. L 00 MH 15 was buried 07 Roots in joint 30 Roots in joiGt 44 Roots in ioint 56 Roots in taint 68 Heavy roots in joint 101 Service R 126 hoots in joint 242 Offset joint 1/2" _ 254 MH 15A (new) Grade and structure good. Roots caught in camera - could not take pictures because of bright spot. TV INSPECTION REPORT _ SOLIDIFICATION, INC. `0,I 'C4 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 15, 1977 PAGE NO. 15 N 1 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee — ' PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: Same ��� ON: right of way south of river FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 122 Ft. ( length) X SANITARY . DEPTH: Ft, PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM AGE: New x Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay _ PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: l Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel _ Concrete _ Asphalt Other e4:ement . 1MANHOLE CONDITION: y Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical Y Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream — Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. 1 REMARKS ,Ft. No. 00 MH 15A — , 23: Large rocks in line 96-107 Low pine 2-3" low _ 122 MH 16 Grade and structure good Should have rocks removed REPORT INDEX Report Summary Location Page — On Minnesota River, from MH 16 - 17 to MH 18 1-3 On Minnesota River, from MH 19 to MH 18 3 On Minnesota River, from MH 19 to MH 20 4 On Minnesota River, from MH 21 to MH 20 5 On Minnesota River, from MH 23 - 22 to MH 21 6-7 — On Minnesota River, from MH 23 to MH 24 8 On Minnesota River, from MH 25 to MH 24 9 On Minnesota River, from MH 25 to MH 26 10 On Minnesota River, from MH 26 to MH 27 11-1? On Minnesota River, from MH 27 to MH 28 13-14 — On Minnesota River, from MH 30 - 29 to MH 28 15-16 On Minnesota River, from MH 30 to MH 31 17 On Minnesota River, from MH 31 to MH 32 18 On Minnesota River, from MH 33 to MH 32 19 On Minnesota River, from MH 33 to MH 34 20 — On Minnesota River, from MH 35 to MH 34 21 On Minnesota River, from MH 35 to MH 36 22 — On Minnesota River, from MH 37 to MH 36 23 Picture pages: — TV INSPECTION REPORT op, SOLIDIFICATION, INC, o' 620 Cottonwood Lane Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: May 77 - Junes ?_ 1977 PAGE NO. W"'"" PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: City or ' hnkonee ON; FROM: TO: Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft, No. • 1:EPO1 T FUMMARy Not much infiltration at pre.,ent time, but in areas where pipe i:, low, joint - t:ould be opened up on bottom and even chan,les: in flow could cause a sewer charging action, and in time w<: ; :,and from outside and in, thu.; :au.:ing .� void around pipe, cAu .ing them to ..ettle, and eventually crinnle your main line into ,eriou . niobler�:., A rouli ynop i:: .:outinue, , but : ee report for _let: it H1H 17 - 1F: ..hould be re-cleaned i:;: lt; - 19: -.hould he re-cle: ned L4H 19 :;nd ; pipe each direction rhould be rai.ed MFI 11 and rine 5f'' un tre.m : hould be r.ai: ed NH '? - MH 71: low pipe all the way & :should be raised - • MH '? :ind "' pipe dean- tre,m - hould be raised MR 23 - MU '4: -cmewhat low, but liveable It appear• th:,t fit .t 75' downstream of MH ?5 i•. very dirty with co.ar..e rock and gravel. If thi were clean, MH 94-95 • would drain better lnd eve'-ything from MH 94 - M13 96 would dr•.in better. Could be re-televised after cleaning and checked out. MH ?5 - MH 77 it dirty, but also appears that high fill bank on to2 of pipe 1;•is caused grade problems from MH 26 - Sta. 81 to 230. Should be raised. CONTINUED TV INSPECTION REPORT- SOLIDIFICATION, INC. °of ; 620 Cottonwood Lane y` 1 Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: M.,y n7 _ limo ' 1977 PAGE N0, PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: City n i� : f;akopt.P AI* AT: ON: :�.; FROM: TO: Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. ,- arinaiad i,H 27 - 18: b.ld L -iie_ 171-''3o 'nd '1: o 1005-381 _. 5hoult_bu r i i ed , MH 1E - MH ''9 - 3n: O:; MH 3r' - 11: OX MH 31 - 3'- O`,- but !t MH 33 - '. : OK - M.H - 34 : OK. but :.e.!1 leek 2•H :5 - 14: low nine, but liveable MU 35 - 2 5: OK, but . e::1 lei:k in NE 35 7 - 1i: One b. d .not for grade, but liveable TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC. °" 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: NAV 17, 1477 PAGE NO. 1 y y 2 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: lme AiON: Minnc�:.eti , iver p FROM: MIT Iii - 17 TO: MN 1£1 LINE: SIZE: 1=: Inches (dia.) 213 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: 7-E Ft. PIPE LENGTH E Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay _ PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: x Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt Other MANHOLE CONDITION: y Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. — PP nil 16 ?9 -ff•-et right id:I 'l/r" I> "di,: ,1io in ;r::de '/4" - 57 'loot.. 1n joint 1 `:^ ' & ?:C11 1 -.iF :loot . in joint 2 • 75 Joint low 1" or ..tn. i 1 high 3 29-1CS 1" low 111 7.00t:, in joint - like Picture r? 17P-14P Low it 1-11i" or 135 Light root in joint 14f` 2111 17 OC MH 17 no-is 1-11" of ::and in pipe 35 service in pipe nt 2:cC 4 49 Henvy root:. tcr• h:n1f pipe low 11/2" 5 SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT „.‘0%' 620 Cottonwood Lane Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: 11:ty ^7, 1977 PAGE NO • . PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: AT: ON: Minne -stn 'fiver FROM: Mil 1 i - 17 TO: *w 1E Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. w^ter in nioe 1 T'n :ible �ervi:-e •"t ':On or hole in pipe full of root: 6 lot; 91 Heavy root entt.:rin; NH 7 9f; MN 18 -- 15-91i l-?" of venter in line E ME 18 'zee following report for ob- tru,:tion & reason it's low, In general, thi'. !:ection look: good except for roots TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC, r', 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: May 27. 1977 PAGE NO. 3 ` Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: RhAkopee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: .:ame • ON: Minnesota River :`?..411W FROM: MH 19 TO: i•„1 1: LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 6o Ft. (length) SANITARY DEPTH: 7-8 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM AGE: New 1960 X Old Years TYPE: Clay _ PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt Other • MANHOLE CONDITION: Good Dirty _ Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream _ Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. CO MI-i 19 6" of writer 00-15 Tapers fiom i" of water to dry pine at ;;t: 15 8 44 Roots in joint E. 1-131' of sand & gravel in pine 9 66 2-2-i" of :.and and gravel in pipe - hold.: water b:.r-E: upr trer.ui 10 77 3-31" sand & gravel 82 Heavy root:; 10:00 & 2:UC 86 MH 18 Pipe grade and structure good, but c;iity & needs cleaning to drain - see next report for ctatu-, on 00-15. SOLIDIFICATION, INC, TV INSPECTION REPOR1 °•.`p, '`'� 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: May 27, 1977 PAGE NO. 4 o — z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: chaknpee �" PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: ,i1me ����� • ON Minne::ot:� River FROM: NH 19 TO: mil 2tl LINE: SIZE: 1A Inches (dia.) _60 Ft. (length) SANITARY DEPTH: R-1R Ft. PIPE LENGTH g Ft. STORM _ AGE: New 1960 X Old Years TYPE: Clay _ PVC Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Dirty Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream — Ft. Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS ,Ft. No. — • 00 MH 19 w ter down .trc;nn 10-11" 02-1? Tapers from lu-11" low to 3" low at 12 — 1?-17 Tapers from 3" low to dry pi ,e at 73ta, 17 50 . Detergent and grea.,e on inner will.; of pi:)e 11 50 MH 20 • Pipe looks good except dirty — * MH 19 ha:: :settled 8-10" and .11:-.o ? pi^e each direction have bettled, _ TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC. °°�� C'; 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: M'y 77, 1977 PAGE NO. 5 N = Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Shakoi et PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: .:ilne ON: Minne!.ot.i River FROM: MH ^1 TO: rill 20 LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 216 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: 8-18 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM AGE: New 1960 X Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other MANHOLE CONDITION: Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. • 00 MH 21 8-9" of water At MU 39 Light root:: in joint 0('-50 Toner: from -c3" of wpter lt MH to dry ar 5o 78 Service L 5" t:ir. OK no flc-•t.' 105-21 Low pipe up to 2'1" low at 150 & 165 125 1-1k" of water 135 11/2' low 140 2' low 150 2'1" low 165 21" low 170 Cease & detergent on inner wall- 185 1.1/2-2" low 218 MH 20 L. Pipe ::t-rur-tur e OK, but low area - up to 2' from 1n5-?15. Real bad grade from 00-5n, un to 9-10" low including MH. Mii - SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT e9" 'C4 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: May 31. 1977 - PAGE NO, 6 — Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Sh�ikopee V PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: sa,;,e ON: Minne-;otn River FROM: MH 7'i - 22 TO: iut 21 LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) .• 41 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: 10-17 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay _ PVC X Concrete — Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other - MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Dirty Fair. . Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Film Photo M.H, REMARKS MH 21 plugged Ft. No. 00 MH 25 25 2-222" low 00-451 Low' 22 1-1;f" low 32-751 1-1 " low 75-90 Low -.-221- 90 Low ?-21" 12 90-111 hH at 110 4-5" low 103 5-6" low 13 111 MH 22 5-3" low MH also low OC MH 22 5-6" low 07 Light root:. in joint 5-3 ' low 14 if Light root:. in joint Like Picture 1'14 25 Light roots in joint 15 TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC, °" , 620 Cottonwood Lane "+ s Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: May 31, 1977 PAGE NO. 7 PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: ch•:knpp,. ON: Minne,nr- River FROM: 1`m 21 _ 71 TO: Mx 21 Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft, No. 00-30 5-6" low 30-40 7-8" low 43 Service L tap 6 or 8" OK 49 8-9" low 16 • 53 9-10" low 50 Camera under water in 11:" of water in 18" pipe 50-95 Camera under water 10" or more low 95-115 Picture, but 9" low 115-130 Low pipe 7-8" 130 MH 21 low 7-8" Thi e..tion, MH72-21 ape:lr. to hive .ettled from 5-10" or more li:.ted, MH T5-22 h.a : n1 .0 :settled, 1-5- li: ted, Pipe :.tructure in both <ection:. i good, • • SOLIDIFICATION, INC. T V INSPECTION REPO R T 0,.°" �'' 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: M sy 11, 1977 PAGE NO 8 Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Shakopee Ai* PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: :.arae ON: Minnesota River FROM: Hil '3 TO: &If 24 LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 38'' Ft. (length) SANITARY DEPTH: 1?-14 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 6 Ft. STORM — AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other _ — MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream .( Downstream Ft, Fr. —_ —r- -- " ---_- -�- —_. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS MH 71 plugged Ft. No. — OC; MH 23 25-41 3/4" dip in gride OK '- 60-76 3/4" dip in gr.:de OK 120-138 3/4" din iii gr•Ide 144-175 Loci grade 1-13" — 175-''40 Low grade 11/2-2' 240-280 Low grade ?-22" -' 249 I.ow 2-2 17 _ 280-100 Low 21-3" 300-340 3-A" low 340-38C "'I-4" low 380 MH 24 3 -4" water •;tand ing in MR — Pipe •.tructure very good. Pipe quite clean. TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: May 31, 1977 PAGE NO, 9 N ` Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Shikonee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: :lime • �iON: Minneot River FROM: MH 25 TO: Nh _4 LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 370 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: 6-9 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 6 Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete i Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other Park MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good dirty Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical Undeveloped Other Park CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft, Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS MR 21 plugged Ft. No. 00 MR 25 00-150 High water :t-inding in pipe 9-10" 188 High water t 'nding in pipe with flow up• tre:;m plugged off 8-9" 18 19b-225 6-8" w:'tor 111 the wly '25-77C 5-5" witer ;t.nding in pipe 270-315 4-5" water :-t.rnding in pie 315-379 31-4" water :.tanding in pipe 356 Typical 18" pipe 4" w iter in pipe 19 379 MH 24 Grade in this section i. uniform, but either the entire line i' settled or heavy flow from 15"- pipe entering MH?5 from the south block,. it & hold water rid/le high in pipe half way b rk to MIi 23, L • SOLIDIFICATION, INC. T V INSPECTION •REP O R T Nom`°�� /r'Pc 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: May 31, 1977 PAGE NO. In s Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Sh•.kopee `� PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: me • 1';).7"441 FROM: ON: Minne:.ot.a River MH '25 - TO: iii .3 LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) _39G Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: 6-7 Ft. PIPE LENGTH T--- Ft. STORM _ AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay _ PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other Park _ - _ MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good _ Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream -- Ft. Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS ,Ft. No. — a NH ?5 07-CS 11" pi;'e low 11" leaving MH and : t ::t,. 9 we h.,ve full picture back - about i." low 35-110 5-7" flow 110-15 5-6" flow 155-.'.00 5-5 " flow 300-360 5-5" flow 360-390 4-5" flow ,9(` MH 26 Thi% section very uniform for grade, but flow in pipe quite deep. Structure very good. Pipe i,. cle,.n. — It appe�:.. that from c:sm'-ra action while nullin ' that the fi_. t 75 or lC(' ft. could be very dirty with ::oar,-:e material:. under flow, cnu:.ing t._ •.- t. t:,b1e•� in ripe in thi : entire -!ren, • • TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC. N?°<, 'C'►,i 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: HAy 11, 1977 PAGE NO. 11 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: <:1U,k0,,(. . PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: y,� ON: Minne ot i River FROM: *il{ ^• , TO: ii:l 17 LINE: SIZE: 11 Inches (dia.) _2,78 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: 8-9 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 6 Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old Years • TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: Good X Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt X Other Park MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS ,Ft. No. • CO 111{ 26 111{ pluitged & •ir:.in:- em•)ty 55-80 .`;t.trt of dirty pipe 80-l( 7 T-per. from dry pi;,e to 10-11" low 107-11 ' 10-11" low 11.3-18:' C ,e;er-* uuder wirer It le.1 't 11" low 18? Picture bael: 9-1t)" low 162-::30 Taper; ba::k to 2" of water 230-760 of w:,ter, taperer to dry pine rt 26o 260-276 Dry pipe to 4" low at 276 276 Dirty & low pipe down 1-4" 20 276-340 L w & dirty 4" 308 Debris, in pipe low 4" 21 343 Joint not home & pipe dirty 22 Low t.Iper., crow ; • low to dry pile dt 111{ 378 MH 27 TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC. y i 620 Cottonwood Lane Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: MJ,,, 11. 1977 PAGE NO. 12 — PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: ::11-tkorPe ,41, AT: ^ ON: Minne r PiVP ' FROM: Mil �E� TO: fix %7 Ft. Fr, Film Photo ' M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. — Pirn rYut Lii r Ct' Rad i,-Ir RC_11.P nver 11" 11,_,1 gr.. 'e 111r.:ir 4" — Need• rLP�ning SOLIDIFICATION, INC. T V INSPECTION REPORT c` ,a 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE • Jun. ", 1977 PAGE NO. 1 " s Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: • Sh kope<. PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: :t.e ON: Minne::otRiver FROM: .�Mit "7 TO: r.:i :'8 LINE: SIZE: Inches (dia.) 1;1_ Ft. (length) x SANITARY DEPTH: 7_1 ' Ft. PIPE LENGTH g Ft. STORM AGE: New x Old Years TYPE: Clay _ PVC Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: Good K Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other • MANHOLE CONDITION: ;� Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical x Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft. Fr, Film M.H. REMARKS MH 27 nlua.ged Photo i I•;lf 27 MH dry & dr-aininr 60-92 Lot: pipo 3/4-1" of wati:r 135-170 Lou 1-11:" 144 `:‘1:vioe k 3 cr 8" Ob. 155 Typic:.1 2" joint low l-11;•• & dirt 23 170-1b7 Low 11/2" & taper: to 7-e" low :t 187 1E7 7 8" low po: ::ibly dirty Wipe under the wAr.er d'bri• & n-e,-e on top ?Of') Low pipe 7-8" 11t 187 F_ t: per..- to lo" lot: .'t '°r' • Dirty on ton. 25 Thi. pipe run: full during normll flow 21: i.00t: in ioint & 8-9" water triner.. from 11" low it 2Pr. hn'•k to 26 8" low at 21:' ?1:- T::per:: from 8-9" low at :1:' b..ek tc 1" of w-:ter it :;cn 23o 2J0-._7t. 1" of w tc•r 277 Root:: in joint & -:." of w%ter `0 ,c4 ' SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT h 620 Cottonwood Lane Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: June 2, 1977 PAGE NO. 14 �� PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: 11.1>;o,,,,e AT: cue I/N ON: Rinne c c:, Liver FROM: N1{ 27 TO: lu{ 78 Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. — 270-3115 ?-3" low 305 2-3" low & t:per:: to 6" low at 355 321 `service R 6 or 8" nir.e O1: low 5-6" 27 — 355-381 Continued 4-5" low to MH 381 MH 28 4" of water in MH — Pipe .ippe.:r • quite '•le^n -ome 're-'•.e on inner w., B:id grade a; noted in report • SOLIDIFICATION, INC, T V INSPECTION REP O R T ; ° c' 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: dun, ?, 1977 PAGE NO. 15 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: :;ll•,k;;;,ep � " PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: :�me - ON: I• nof�� l:fiver J FROM: 3iin() -.a�y TO: MH. :c. LINE: SIZE: •1 Inches (dia.) 17b Ft, (length) SANITARY DEPTH: 1g-lq Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC __x__ Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transits Other CONDITION: Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete - Asphalt Other MANHOLE CONDITION: Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream Downstream Ft. Fr., Film Photo M.H. REMARKS t^_! ^7 ~•lc':^e.t Ft. No. 0: Mit 30 00-301 3/4-1" of w ter 30-50 1-12i" of w::tor ;,tan.Jins; ** 59 Calcium build-up :It ':O ' & f^• t drin 1:-'' ' 104• ( 28 50-6 l•z-Y" low :t :t.+, 66 & t.•ner: to dry nine ,t :38 joint .at 68 1" 4i,1h 68-l06 Low 121-2" of wlter low point ':t:� Q5 - '" 110-130 Low 1'• 130-150 Or: _ 168 MH 29 Pipe structure good. 1-2" of water in bottom 0f pi'le on enri e line Very good • 00 tui 29 debris in MH holding water 2-2 high up. tre:im to Sta. WO 65 , Serviceaat 12:' - r +cd & protruding pipe low 12;-2" s 29 SOLIDIFICATION, INC, TV INSPECTION REPOR1- `°i, 620 Cottonwood Lane Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: Juae 2', 1977 PAGE NO. 1� — 1.44PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: . Sh ,konee �� AT: ,ame ON: Minnesot.. iciver FROM: MH 30 - ?9 TO: Kiri 28 Ft. Fr, Film Photo 1 M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. 1cr1-151 Low 1k-?" l56 Li'ht root:. in joint & low 31" _ 30 150-1W Low 9-r 16n-185 Low 1-4" , 186-189 Low 1k-4" — 190 MH 28 Gr::de on thi section bounce• around from 1-4" low .i:: noted but no harp break.: in grade and cuite uniform. +� Pine t:uctu e very good. .'cmewh t gre., y on inner will — TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC, pt '� DATE: June 2, 1977 PAGE NO. 17 N. o ' i 620 Cottonwood Lane Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Shakopee PH: (612) 535-1065 ON:AT: same Minnesota River Np�NNNa� FROM: MH 30 TO: MH 31 LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) 361 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: 18-11 Ft, PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS 1Ft. No. 00 MH 30 MH 30 plugged MH 30 dry at start 05-55 Low pipe tapers to 3V" deep at 38 and back to dry pipe at 55 * 117 Service at 1:0(' flowing 31 * 156 Service at 12:00 - many fast streams of water flowing out 32 — 166 Soap suds and flow out of service 33 217 Service at 1:00 OK 291 Service lt 1:0U OK 293 Service at 12:00 tapped & heavy flow Looks like Picture #32 & 33 305 Low pipe or dip in grade 340 Service at 2:00 tapped OK 361 MJi 31 Debris in MH holds water back to 305 about 112-?" deep Pipe clean and grade very good - structure very good SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT c`°�� C'; 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 2. 1977 PAGE NO, 18 _ Y Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: chnkoppe �-.‘2:4�� PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: ' n n ON: s a Minnesota River FROM: MH 31 TO: MH 32 LINE: SIZE: 91 Inches (dia.) _ 3,5 Ft. (length) i DEPTH: 11_8 Ft, PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. X SANITARY STORM — AGE: New x Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC x Concrete — Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other Brush - — MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. I 00 MH 31 MH 30 plugged * 18 Heavy leak in joint 3:00 1-1A gal, per min, 34 — 34 Calcium build-up on joint has leaked not now 51 Calcium build-up hes leaked 171 Debris or cement in bottom of pipe holds 1-11" of water in — pipe back to Sta. WUt) 206 Service at 12:00 tapped OK dry — 3.35 MH 32 Pipe clean line, grade, structure - very good _ Leak at Sta. 18 should be sealed TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC, °i, 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 2_ 1977 • PAGE NO. 19 Ny Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: z..hakorpee �"6 PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: s,me �� ON Minnesota RiverFROM: MH 33 TO: MH 32 LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) 370 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: 8_9 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay _ PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other Woods MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft, Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. 00 MH 33 MH 30 plugged 00-20 Low pipe 1e" 52 Service at 12:00 flowing OK 158 Service L 11:0C dry OK 248 Service L tapped dry OK 37C MH 32 ,ection very good for line, grade, structure � t SOLIDIFICATION, INC, TV INSPECTION REPORT °y°" : 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June ?, 1977 PAGE NO, _2 1 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: :hakopee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: name 774111° ON: Minnesota River FROM: MH 33 TO: MH 34 LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) 296 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: 9-7 Ft, PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM — AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC — x Concrete — Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: x Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other woods _ MANHOLE CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical x Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream x Downstream Ft. Fr. M, M.H. Film Photo REMARKS Ft, No. 1 OC MH 33 MH 30 plugged 06 Fast drip in joint at 12:0 ' 02-48 Low pipe out of MH 1-l1" 296 NH 34 This _vection very good for line, grade, and structure No problems 4 � TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC. `o'' 'c, DATE: June 1. 1977 PAGE NO. 1 620 Cottonwood Laneo Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: _•hakopee /RM PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: r,:ame ON: FROM: Mtnne' ota River MH 15 TO: MH 34 LINE: SIZE: ?1 Inches (dia.) 113 Ft. (length) SANITARY DEPTH: 7_8 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old _ Years TYPE: Clay _ PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other wood:; MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS MH 34 plugged Ft. No. 00 MH 35 * 02 Leak at 5:30 po•:ition in MH at end of 21" pipe 1/2 gal, per mien. 34 Typical 21" pipe ,.howl normal flow line & low pipe 2-21" 35 43 21/2-3" low 51 Taxers to 4-5" low 58 Tapers to 5-6" low Note how much higher normal flow marks 36 are now 58-95 Tapers back to about 11" low manhole ahead 95 1-11" low 37 113 MH 34 Bad grade on this line: 58' is the low point and this rect y un er a cu vert t at era ns: a po o e ac - .s, this birm - on top of sewer - lowest area 30-95 Pipe in clean and structure i.; good. Leak in MH 35 should be sealed. SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT `° � % 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: -Tune 1_ 1977 PAGE NO. ?2 N Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: Minna.ntu Rjver FROM: MH 35 Tot MH 35 LINE: SIZE: ., Inches (dia.) --..3,— _309 Ft. (length) gSANITARY DEPTH: 7 8 Ft. PIPE LENGTH A Ft. STORM AGE: New x Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: _ _ Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: — Gravel _ Concrete Asphalt Other — wood,. MANHOLE CONDITION: _ Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical Undeveloped - Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream __ Downstream — Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS1tg - tt,ggad Ft. No. — 00 MH- 3.5 MA bottom c1oee to dry 50-66 3/4-1" of watar 7G rglrinm hitild_,.p on joint 38 .1Ff-2f5 Tapers to 1J" dPPp nt 1P t,. hark to 1/4" at NIS t 1R6 Lnwpnint 1-i?" of water 205 Taoer:; from 1/4" deep to 7-7 ' deep at Sta_ 235 & continues 2-2 " deep to Sta. 260 260 Taper; from 2-2_4' deem al 260 .ark to about 3/4" at Sta 275 275 MH OK 302 MH 36 Pipe structure is zonsi Grade varies 2-2S" but uniform Pipe is clean f TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC, y° ,Z 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 3, 1977 PAGE NO. ?3 N Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: ch;, n_, e PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: .:;uue - ON: M-1.[Lne_,o t a iYex J•. .1 FROM: MH 37 TO: MH 15 LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) 297 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: 20-8 Ft, PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron - Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel - Concrete - Asphalt Other woods • — MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft. Film PhotoM.H. REMARKS MH 34 plugged _ j 1Ft. No. 60 J MH 37 at sewer plant 2-3" of water standing in this pipe because of heavy flow entering MH 37 from the east. 2-3" at manhole and tapers off to a dry pipe at Sta. 175. , 00-175 Grade uniform 209 Normal flow marker half pine pipe greasy on igside 39 joint corroded typical 209-217 Tapers to 4" low at 217 217-225 Taper:: from 4" low back to normal 292 MH 36 This section looks very good for line and structure Sharp grade dip at 209-225 Pipe is greasy 1 APPENDIX A3 TV INSPECTION LOGS OF RIVER TRUNK SEWER, 1992 ,caro= SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 7233 Winnetka Avenue North / Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 / (612) 535-1065 April 15,. 1992 Mr. Dave Simons Short Elliot Hendrickson 3535 Vadnais Center Drive St. Paul, Minnesota 55110 SUBJECT: TELEVISION INSPECTION REPORT WORK ORDER #5218 Dear Mr. Simons, Enclosed are the field findings of our television inspection report. Should you have any questions regarding this inspection please, feel free to contact our office. Also enclosed is a copy of our invoice, the original invoice has been sent to the accounts payable department. We look forward to serving your future needs. Thank You, Robert Ratz Sales Manager RR/kb enclosures Specialists In Underpinning and Ground Water Control CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION INSPECTION REPORT FOR SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON IN _ SHAKOPEE,, MINNESOTA WORK ORDER NUMBER 5213 Shakopee, Minnesota April 8, 1992 Solidification,, Inc_ 7233 Winnetka Avenue Nort_ Minneapolis, Minnesota 5542 (612) 535-106, \Otf ICq) ` o' Off. - h Z •N``• 1,C ' SOLIDIFICATION, INC. CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION PROCEDURE The television inspection is conducted by pulling a water proof television camera, at a uniform rate, through the sewer line. The line condition, as viewed by the television camera, is transmitted to a television screen (monitor) . The television technician observes and records the following pertinent data: • Broken, cracked or missing pipe . Alignment, line and grade • Defective joints . Infiltration or inflow Root intrusions . Service connections (and locations) . Protruding taps • Other pertinent factors that would affect proper functioning of the line. ._ RECORDS Written records are kept of pertinent data. In addition, polaroid pictures (from the television screen) are taken of defects, etc. , and included in the ..r report. The report locates all taps and services, indicating the distance from the manhole. The service is further identified as entering from the right or left, using the clock face as a means of identification. Depending upon the analysis, pertinent recommendations are included. • `to f Oi /C4 fr H 2 DEFINITIONS Broken A section of line or service loose or missing from the pipe. Camera Under Water Indicates a flowing or standing liquid in excess of one-half pipe. Circular crack A crack around the circumference of the pipe. Clock A position relating to the numerals — on the face of a clock. Collapsing Indicates that a section of pipe — is broken and in danger of falling in. Combined sewer A sewer intended to serve as a sani- tary and a storm sewer. Dead End The beginning of a section of line on the upstream side. Downstream exfiltration The leakage or flow of discharge — being carried by sewers out into the ground through leaks in pipes, joints, manholes, or other sewer system structures ( the reverse of infiltration) . Drip A slow intermittent flow of extran- eous water entering the pipe through a joint, service, or structural deficiency. — Fractured pipe A pattern of irregular cracks in the pipe. Hairline crack A minor crack, not necessarily a structural failure. Infiltration Water entering a sewer system and service connections from the ground, through means such as, but not limited to, defective pipes, pipe • joints, connections, or manhole walls. Infiltration does not include and is distinguished from inflow. ,o\f y Z Inflow Water discharged into a sewer system and sewer connections from such sources as, but not limited to, roof leaders, cellar, yard and area drains, foundation drains, cooling water discharges, drains from springs and swampy areas, man- _, hole covers, cross connections from storm sewers and combined sewers, catch basins, storm waters, surface run-off, street wash waters, or drainage. Inflow does not include and is distinguished from infil- tration. Infiltration/Inflow The total quantity of water from both infiltration and inflow with- - out distinguishing the source. Inside drop A sewer line which enters the man- hole wall at an elevation above the invert and discharges (drops) wastewater directly into the man- hole some variable distance above the manhole bottom. Leak A measureable, steady flow of extraneous water entering the pipe through a joint, service or other pipe structural deficiency. Longitudinal crack A crack parallel to the direction of flow. Manhole (Standard) An opening in a sewer provided for the purpose of permitting access to the sewer system for inspections and manitenance. Misalignment Departure from true grade line of pipe. Offset joint Indicates a misalignment of the joint. Open crack or open joint Any crack or joint where separa- tion is evident. f /C4? O ON. ', ��„ Outside drop A sewer line that comes to a manhole at an elevation higher than the invert; a — vertical riser is connected to the line and is brought into the manhole at the invert with a 90° elbow. Piece missing A piece broken out of the wall of -' the pipe. Radial crack A circular crack of less than 360°. Sanitary sewer A sewer intended to carry only _ sanitary and industrial waste- waters from residences, commercial buildings, industrial plants, and institutions. Service A manufactured wye or tap con- nected to the main line. — Service leaking Infiltration into the sewer around a service connection. Service running A measureable, steady flow of ex- traneous water entering the pipe from the service connection. Spiral crack A crack progressing longitudinally in a corkscrew pattern. — Storm sewer A sewer intended to carry only stormwater, surface run-off, street wash waters, and drainage. Tap protruding A service that protrudes into the main sewer line. Upstream The higher end of a gravity flow sewer line. s g SOLIDIFICATION, INC. -- •" •�� 7233 Winnetka Avenue North / Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 / (612) 535-1065 ROOT GROWTH RATING SYSTEM L. FOR ROOTS IN MUNICIPAL SEWER SYSTEMS I. . . .:.„ 4,..,,..,,..., , ,"0, . .. ,,,,,u. .,... .., ,.., . 4 ',/,., . .. 1 A _.,....... . ., ,, . ,-,„ , :. .. . , . ,, . wit_ .,L L_ V1` tel'" - � '�;�>•,� vt ,� j� K %- . Z3 % --- I s.. 1 2 3 'r3'. 1. 13... ...4 . e 0 , i, . 2, ' ,:ti: •sto;.t%,I. ' .4.,... ft tI •t; 4 5 6 • -i z^^ lleti K, • s "V +i _ f.`. . i' %.t • i • 7 g 9 0 to 9 System for rating root growth. A rating of 1 indicates 10% of pipe capacity occupied by root growth. Ratings con- -- tinue through this numerical scale to 9, which indicates 90% occupancy by roots. , , No rating of 10 was used, as this would be 100% occupancy and a complete root stoppage. z Specialists In Underpinning and Ground Water Control TV INSPECTION REPORT - •. SOUDIFICATION, INC. DATE: 3-23-92 PAGE NO. 1 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH . FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. — MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota4,4fAit�� (612) 535 1065 ON Easement along Minnesota River �►v J FROM: MS #2 TO: MH #3 R.Q. #5213 LINE: DIAMETER: 15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x -" DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 395 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x — SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: -- PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD x TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP — Ft. From Video Photo — MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #2 at West end of the project where line goes under Highway 169 00 38 Roots in joint #8 1 — 50 Roots in joint #8 56 Roots in joint #9 - tryed to pull to next manhole to clean camera, got stuck at 114' , backed out and put camera in at next manhole, backed to 247 ' got stuck again, continued downstream '- 261 Roots in joint #6 2 315 Roots in joint #3 369 Roots in joint #5 — 387 Roots in joint #1 395 Manhole #3 360 TV... INSPECTION .REPORT. ,..°'' 'c4•Z SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 3-23-92 2 DATE: PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 � . . J ON: Easement along Minnesota River FROM: MH #3 TO: MH #4 LINE: DIAMETER: 15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 8 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 372 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD X TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #3 360 24 Roots in joint #3 96 Roots in joint #8 3 148 Roots in joint #9 162 Roots in joint #5 305 Roots in joint #1 ... 372 Manhole #4 777 TV.._INSPECTION REPORT. — y�o%' 'C ,i SOLIDIFICATION, INC. yDATE: 3-23-92 PAGE NO. 3 — 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. �'- MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota 4gi& (612) 535-1065 ON: Easement along Minnesota River FROM: MH #4 TO: MH #5 LINE: DIAMETER: 15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x — DEPTH: 13 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 379 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x — SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: — PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD x TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS — NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo — MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #4 777 — 204 Roots in joint #1 — 291 Service Right tap ok 299 Roots in joint #5 379 Manhole #5 1118 TV INSPECTION REPORT 1 ' c4,, SOLIDIFICATION, INC. DATE: 4-1-92 PAGE NO. 4 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. Ati- MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 (612) 535.1065 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota — � ON: Minnesota River - Easement l FROM: MH #8 TO: MH #7 LINE: DIAMETER: 15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM DEPTH: 12 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM X LINE LENGTH: 96 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD X OTHER: FAIR TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE X DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #8 at end of Clay Street Televising with Rahr Company - flow off 1116 96 Manhole #7 1238 TV INSPECTION .REPORT.. _ • •°" '�.- SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 5 e- i . DATE: 4-1-92 PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.— �' tk‘iiiv-, MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota VA IP (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #7 TO: MH #6 LINE: DIAMETER: 15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM — DEPTH: 13 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM X LINE LENGTH: 115 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X — SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD X OTHER: FAIR — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE X DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: — PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP - Ft. From Video Photo _ MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #7 1238 _ 115 Manhole #6 1336 TV_ INSPECTION REPORT 'c4,o SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-1-92 DATE: PAGE NO. 6 y = 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota -406 (612) 535-1065 J ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #6 TO: MH #5 _ LINE: DIAMETER: 15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM DEPTH: 13 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM x LINE LENGTH: 189 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD x OTHER: FAIR TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #6 1336 189 Manhole #5 - behind Dairy Queen 1520 . _TILINSPECTION .REPORT. _ • �°'` IC 4A.:. •.,i DATE:SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-1-92 PAGE NO. 6 — 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOUS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota Aio-, (61215351065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #8 TO: MH #9 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x — DEPTH: 12 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 375 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x — SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: - FAIR x — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: — PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP — Ft. From Video Photo — MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #8 at Clay Street - 15" line plugged 1520 — at manhole #8 02-100 Very dirty 2 - 3 inches of debris on the bottom — 159 Service Right tap - protruding 4 inches 4 208 Service Right tap ok 302 Service Right tap ok — 375 Manhole #9 at end of Pierce Street 1816 Entire line is dirty TV._ INSPECTION REPORT y...N°' SOLIDIFICATION, • ' '��r i INC. DATE: 4-1-92 PAGE NO. 7 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTHFOR: Short Elliott. Hendrickson, Inc. Ati--• MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota WA( / (6121 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #9 TO: MH #10 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 12 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM '- LINE LENGTH: 379 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #9 at end of Pierce Street 1816 02-110 Dirty 1 - 2 inches of debris on bottom 126 Service Right tap ok 245 Service Right tap - protruding 3 - 4 inches 5 275 Service Right tap - protruding 4 inches 6 379 Manhole #10 2075 Line is quite dirty through out TV .. INSPECTION REPORT.: - oV IC4 ,, ? SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-1-92 8 DATE: PAGE NO. 1 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc._ MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT. Shakopee, Minnesota I (612) 535 1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement 1 FROM: MH #10 TO: MH #11 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 10 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 116 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x — SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD x OTHER: FAIR — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: — PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR _ OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS — NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo — MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #10 2075 — 05 Service 12:00 tap ok 116 Manhole #11 2158 TV_INSPECTION REPORT ) 'C4• SOLIDIFICATION, INC. • y i . DATE: 4-1-92 PAGE NO. 9 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,(612) 55-106MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #11 TO: MH #12 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 271 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #11 - line is plugged 2158 06 Service 12 :00 tap ok 88 Roots in joint #2 120 Offset joint 12 inches offset 7 179 Service Right tap ok 271 Manhole #12 2370 TV _ INSPECTION REPORT — g" 'c+,Z SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-1-92 PAGE NO. 10 DATE: 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. — til MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota IiiiP (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement J FROM: MH #12 TO: MH #13 — LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x — DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 380 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x — SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: — PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEWSPEED: Fp Ft. From Video Photo — MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #12 2370 — 75 Service 12:00 tap ok 107 Roots in joint #3 121 Roots in joint #1 211 Roots in joint #1 306 Roots in joint #2 — 327 Service 12:00 tap ok 331 Roots in joint #4 360 Roots in joint #5 372 Roots in joint #2 . 380 Manhole #13 2600 — TV___INSPECTION_REPORT. ..%°% 'caro SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-1-92 • DATE: PAGE NO. 11 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. , MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 — VI (612) 535-1065 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota ��` ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #13 TO: MH #14 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 135 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD • OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD x TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #13 - where Scott Street would come out 2600 46 Looks like roots around a tap - not a joint 67 Roots in joint #4 102 Roots in joint #3 135 Manhole #14 2706 -.v TV._...INSPECTION REPORT _ 1y,,°`' 'c. ,,1 SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-2-92 PAGE NO. 12 DATE: I 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson,. Inc. _ ii*A"--, MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT. Shakopee,. Minnesota (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement — J FROM: MH #14 TO: MH #15 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT x DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 243 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT — SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL • FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS _ NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo — MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #14 - line is plugged here 2706 — 37q Roots in joint #1 — 48 Large rock in line (4-5 inches) 158 Roots in joint #1 _ 165 Roots in joint #2 180-207 Low pipe 3 - 32 inches low 207 Offset joint 12 inches offset 230 Roots in joint #2 243 Manhole #15 - where Atwood Street would be 2848 _ TV INSPECTION REPORT ic. SOLIDIFICATION, INC. y i - DATE: 4-2-92 PAGE NO. 13 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR. Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. ���� MINNEAPO(612) 535-1065ULP NNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota Ii 'Yq� �►`- ON: Minnesota River - Easement J FROM: MH #15 TO: MH #16 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: _ 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM "- LINE LENGTH: 380 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: — _ STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL. FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL — UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. — 00 Manhole #15 where Atwood Street would be - large 2848 roots in manhole - growing down the pipe a couple feet 06 Roots in joint #2 18 Roots in joint #1 ,_ 30 Roots in joint #4 42 Roots in joint #1 — 54 Roots in joint #2 66 Roots in joint #5 116-126 Low pipe 12 - 2 inches low _ - 101 Service Right ok 126 Roots in joint #1 150 Roots in joint #3 156 Roots in joint #1 162 Roots in joint #2 1 168 Roots in joint #1 TV INSPECTION REPORT �, SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-2-92 13A DATE: PAGE NO. *1.1111.4 7233 MINNEAPOLIS, AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson,. Inc. MINNEAPOLISMINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #15 TO: MH #16 Ft. From Video Photo _ MH REMARKS Ft. No. 198 Roots in joint #4 255 Manhole - new manhole added for service 355 Large rock in pipe (4-5 inch) 380 Manhole #16 - where Fuller Street would come out 3094 1 . _TV._.INSPECTION REPORT SOUDIFlCATION, INC. 4-2-92 14 y o . DATE: PAGE NO.. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: short Elliott Eenarickson, Inc. Ativ--. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota 42AiP 1612) 535 1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #16 TO: MH #17 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X _ DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 140 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR X TYPE: CAST IRON. POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE _ COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP • Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #16 - where Fuller Street would be 3094 67 Roots in joint #1 109 Roots in joint #2 140 Manhole #17 3184 f • fr _TV___INSPECTION..REPORT. • 0 ,,9%? �,, SOLIDIFICATION, INC. DATE: 15 4-2-92 PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota ViVi (612) 535-1065 ON. Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #20 TO: MH #19 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM DEPTH: 18 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM x LINE LENGTH: 60 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x _ SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR _ TYPE: CAST IRON POOR x CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: — PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR _ OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo — MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #20 under 169 bridge on west side 3184 43-60 Low pipe up to 10 inches llow 52 Looks like and offset joint 8 60 Manhole #19 3251 TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-2-92 16 , i DATE: PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota ��� (612) 535-1065 Minnesota River - Easement J ON: FROM: MH #19 TO: MH #18 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM DEPTH: 6 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM X LINE LENGTH: 82 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD _ - OTHER: FAIR X TYPE: CAST IRON - POOR CLAY CONCRETE X DUCTILE - MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS _ INDUSTRIAL POOR x OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #19 - manhole is low 9 - 10 inches 3251 02-12 Low pipe up to 6 inches low 82 Manhole #18 3301 Looks like 2 - 3 inches of debris on bottom of pipe _TV INSPECTION..REPORT_ >0'' SOLIDIFICATION, INC. • DATE: 4-2-92 PAGE NO. 17 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. — MINNEAPOLIS, nc. _MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 ' ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #18 . TO: MH #17 LINE: DIAMETER: 8 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM X LINE LENGTH: 98 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR X _ TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE X DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR X TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR -. OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo — MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #18 3301 06 Roots in joint #5 15 Large chunk of roots on top of the pipe - does not appear to be at a joint - may be a tap here _ 62 Service Left tap ok 98 Manhole #17 3362 Line is quite dirty through out TV.. INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC. • ° . DATE: 4-6-92 PAGE NO. 18 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #20 TO: MH #21 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 21 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM - LINE LENGTH: 218 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR TYPE: CAST IRON POOR x CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD x TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS - INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #20 - this manhole is plugged 3362 02-80 Low pipe 2 - 3 inches standing water 140 Service Right tap ok 166-194 Low pipe up to 11 inches 194-218 Camera under water 218 Manhole #21 - stands with 2 - 3 inches of solids manhole is very low 3445 _._.TV,. INSPECTION REPORT. _ �. SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 0 : - DATE: 4-6-92 PAGE NO. 19 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. — *, MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612)535-1065 �11 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #21 TO: MH #22 _ LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X DEPTH: 12 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 130 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR TYPE: CAST IRON POOR X CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: — PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL - POOR X — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING _X OTHER: TYPE: VHS • NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo — MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #21 - manhole is low with debris standing in manhole 3445 02-108 Camera is under water 108-130 Low pipe 8 inches low 130 _Manhole #22 3512 • TV INSPECTION REPORT 'C+,o SOLIDIFICATION, INC. DATE: 4-6-92 PAGE NO. 20 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. !m'" , MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 � AT: Shakopee, Minnesota 16121 535-1065 ,� ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #22 TO: MH #23 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X DEPTH: 10 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM - "- LINE LENGTH: 110 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR TYPE: CAST IRON POOR X CLAY CONCRETE X DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: RP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #22 - manhole is low 8 - 9 inches low 3512 — 02-30 Low pipe 9 - 10 inches low 30-98 Low pipe 4 - 6 inches low 110 Manhole #23 3570 .TV INSPECTION REPORT ,,�'' , SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-6-92 21 y _ DATE: PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. — MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #23 TO: MH #24 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 14 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 378 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x_ UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x _ TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: — PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR _ OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING _XOTHER: TYPE: VHS _ NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo — MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #23 at end of Lewis Street - manhole plugged 357C 05-200 Low pipe 2 - 3 inches of standing water 200-378 Low pipe 4 - 5 inches of standing water 378 Manhole #24 at the end of Summerville Street 3720 TV :._INSPECTION REPORT SOUDIFICATION, INC. • 7 . DATE: 4-6-92 PAGE NO. 22 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 AT: t; ON: Minnesota River - Easement r - FROM: MH #24 TO: MH #25 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X DEPTH: 9 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 379 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR X TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR X TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #24 at end of Summerville Street 3720 • 02-120 Low pipe 4 - 5 inches standing water 120-310 Low pipe 6 - 10 inches low 310-366 Camera under water 379 Manhole #25 at the end of Spencer Street 3879 _ — Some of the water could be held up from the 15" line coming in from the South. TV.. INSPECTION .REPORT.. _ ,>o`` 'C4., SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-6-92 23 y E NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. _ MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (6121535-165 Minnesota River - Easement 4140 1 ON: FROM: MA #25 TO: MH #26 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 388 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR X _ TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE - COMMERCIAL FAIR X TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL X UNDEVELOPED VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From I Video Photo — MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #25 at the end of Spencer Street - this 3879 — manhole leaks heavy when river is up 02-100 Dirty - rocks & debris 81 Joint leaking 2:00 388 Manhole #26 at end of Fillmore Street 4065 Flow coming in manhole #25 from the 15" line to the south is only 2 - 3 inch in the 15" pipe - TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-6-92 24 0 PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota t6121 535-1065 Minnesota River - Easement ON: FROM: MH #26 TO: MH #27 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 8 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 372 -Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR TYPE: CAST IRON POOR x' CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x— OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: F.P Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #26 at end of Fillmore Street 4065 70-200 Low pipe camera under water 203 Joint leaking 278-308 Low pipe camera under water 308-370 Low pipe 3 - 4 inches low 372 Manhole #27 at end of Main Street 4206 Line seems to be quite dirty. TV.. INSPECTION REPORT.. — ,>�'' 'c.4., SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-6-92 25 y i DATE: PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. — MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #27 TO: MH #28 LINE: • DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 8 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 377 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR TYPE: CAST IRON POOR x — CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: — PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP -' Ft. From Video Photo — MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #27 at end of Main Street - manhole leaking 4206 — 57 Joint leaking approximately 1 g.p.m. 139 Service Right tap ok 142-165 Low pipe 3 - 4 inches low — 165-217 Camera under water 271 Roots in joint #1 — 274-302 Low pipe 3 - 4 inches low 302-356 Camera under water 356-377 Low pipe 4 - 5 inches low 377 Manhole #28 at end of Market Street 4353 Line may be dirty, water standing the whole way. - TV INSPECTION REPORT. 'C4, SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-8-92 26 0 i _ DATE: PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT. Shakopee, Minnesota ��V• 16121 535-1065 ON Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #28 TO: MH #29 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x _ DEPTH: 18 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 189 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR X TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: _ PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR X TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #28 at end of Market Street - plugged at 4353 this manhole - manhole has small leaks 02-45 8 - 10 inches of standing water & debris 15 Large pile of debris 36 Roots in joint #3 45-189 Pipe very dirty 3 - 5 inches of debris 126 Service 12:00 tap - protruding about 2 inches 157 Joint leaking approximately 1 g.p.m. 158 Service Right tap ok 189 Manhole #29 4450 Line is very dirty _..TV.. INSPECTION REPORT _ 'C4. SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 0 i 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 27 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.-- MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota " (612) 535 1065 J ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #29 TO: MH #30 _ LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 16 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 188 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x — SANITARY . x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR _ CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: — PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS _ NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo — MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #30 4450 02-188 Very dirty 2 - 3 inches of debris 188 Manhole #30 at Minnesota Street 4517 TV. INSPECTION REPORT. SOLIDIFICATION, INC. DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 28 b = 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota gNN 16121 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River Easement FROM: MH #30 TO: MH #31 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X DEPTH: 10 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 359 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X _ SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR X TYPE; CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE X DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR X TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL — UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #30 at Minnesota Street 4517 02-359 Dirty 2 - 22 inches of debris 46 Joint dripping 78 Joint dripping 115 Service Right tap ok 163 Service 12:00 tap ok 182 Roots in joint #1 - joint is leaking 215 Service Right tap ok 289 Service Right tap ok 292 Service Right tap ok _ 337 Service Right tap ok 359 Manhole #31 at end of Dakota Street 4650 Line is quite dirty through out TV_ INSPECTION REPORT _ so" 'c+ SOUDIFICATION, INC 0 '' . DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 29 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. — 4MINNEAPOLIS,(612)535-1065 AT:MINNESOTA 55428 Shakopee, Minnesota � J ON; Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #31 TO: MH #32 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x '— DEPTH: 3 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 364 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x _ TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR ? TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: FP Ft. From Video Photo — MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #31 at end of Dakota Street 4650 — Manhole is buried - can not find 02 Very dirty 2 - 22 inches of debris 09 Joint leak approximately 5 g.p.m. 9 17 Joint leaking heavy approximately 4 g.p.m. 10 142 Service 12:00 tap ok 153 Joint dripping 203 Service Right tap ok 241 Roots at joint #2 joint is leaking approximately 1 g.p.m._ 273 Joint leaking approximately lg.p.m. 321 Joint leaking approximately 2 g.p.m. 364 Manhole #32 4799 Line is quite dirty through out TV INSPECTION REPORT '64., SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-8-92 30 y i PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson,. Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428AT: Shakopee, Minnesota _ Air. (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement s FROM: MH #32 TO: MH #33 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 9 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 360 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: — STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON POOR — CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD — TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL — UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: • AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. — 00 Manhole #32 at end of Prairie Street - MH plugged 4799 02-368 Dirty 2 - 22 inches of debris 31 Joint dripping 55 Joint dripping — 63 Service Right tap ok 68 Service Right tap ok — 121 Service Right tap ok 145 Joint leaking approximately 2. g.p.m. 11 194 Leak through barrel approximately 1/2 g.p.m. 20.0 . Joint leaking approximately 1 g.p.m. --- 211 Service Right tap ok — 318 Service 12:00 tap ok 360 Joint leaking approximately 1/2 g.p.m. 368 Manhole #33 4970 Fl i Line is quite dirty throught out : - _TV__.INSPECTION..REPORT ' ,> c4., SOLIDIFICATION, INC. y i . DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 31 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc._ , MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 Shakopee, Minnesota i1P (612) 535-1065 AT: ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #33 TO: MH #34 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X — DEPTH: 9 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 295 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X ... SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x _ TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: — PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR _ OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING _2L_ OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: FP — Ft. From Video Photo — MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #33 4970 — 02-295 Dirty 2 - 3 inches of debris 05 Joint dripping — 76 Joint dripping 125 Service 12:00 tap ok 140 Roots in joint #4 - leaking — 228 Joint dripping 295 Manhole #34 5111 Line is quite dirty through out • TV. INSPECTION REPORT yy` " sc'. SOLIDIFICATION, INC. DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 32 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee,. Minnesota — W* (612) 535 1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement • FROM: MH #34 TO: MH #35 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 10 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 112 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: — STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON POOR -- CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD — TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR X TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHs NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. — 00 Manhole #34 5111 — 02-112 Dirty 3 - 4 inches of debris 22 Joint leaking approximately 1/2 g.p.m. 112 Manhole #35 manhole is leaking 5178 Line may be 4 - 5 inches low between 10 ' & 90' — hard to tell because of dirt ..._W . INSPECTION. REPORT. _ 'c4r SOLIDIFICATION, INC. y 0. DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 33 Z 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson., Inc. -- ®®®®®® MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota l�t (612) 535-1065 p �/�9' PP , ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #37 TO: MH 4136 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM — DEPTH: 23 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM x LINE LENGTH: 286 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x — SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x _ TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: — PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD x TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL AGE: EXISTING x UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP -' Ft. From Video Photo — MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #37 at lift station - plugged at MH #35 5178 _ 157 Joint leaking - dripping 188-199 3 good size rocks 205 Offset joint approximately 2 inches — 205-240 Low pipe 3 - 4 inches low - also dirty 286 Manhole #36 5270 Line is dirty most of the way TV INSPECTION REPORT _ y,,•o ,Z SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-8-92 34 DATE: PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson,. Inc. !�" MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota VAO (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement r- J FROM: MH #36 TO: MH #35 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM DEPTH: 10 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM x — LINE LENGTH: 300 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: — STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR X TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY _ CONCRETE X • DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD — TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: _ EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #36 5270 — 40-300 Very dirty 3 - 4 inches of debris 265 Large rock in the pipe 300 Manhole #35 5400 Line is quite dirty through out N tip,. ; X t w a. r'ti (+ -f .' BSc; •F're n • — 4 . CO - .i -- �_ r... _ .. Z T4, -• ? -It - L .. , , . ! i 141, 1.1 f , 4` f L ..,„ 2-;. .10%.;-�,. .: , .____. . . -- - • -- •_____ __._ .._, L . i•„..,. ...._:, ---___::.__:,z___t_t____—.5:...• 1 • ••_ .. . .. •_. . .. .. . . .. ,_ } .. ... . „ . • co • 1 1 . „ 0.....- -- %."="'"...-.....;-,-...". - - , . ... .- tp i -T= F'rl CV $4 0c _ 1 0 X • � _ 0 j 3. - vo o ' *. - 1- ! , ,_, n✓ - +, S E •u.,,w 8 ,, , Il • • • II 11 I I 1♦ 1 • I( :i j - !1 .. _ t" �- _5 " II �. C- 1 II 3L M ' ._ - ; - 'fir - 11 g _ _ ,. ' "� I , - 4 1 :1 R ;; • :._ - . r u a-= - - - - - IF -OW* . I „,,,,..t.tor. • "thite;--a.I.:-'• . . , . ... ._ . , L 0 I,-, ...,..... , , _ ..._ , 1 . __...... _ ...... ....... . ... ._ __.,......__,-„... , ,, • • ""r14...-'• - ” • .-., _ , 0 ru ...,,,_._.., - ......7#.•=r' """--r- .......,,,-.... ' ..."`•••':*- -" -'71.i..:1.-7: i-,..........-----7.,-.:-..--,--- _ - .,-)•;7%--I - -----..-?-11.1- •••':....=-.•-,t . • ,,,-t-•%-Z.,--1.."... ; - 0 ..... ....rZit .1r-i--.. 1 0 co _ 1 . . ...-: _-_....z.-Er-z---• . 4 c. m ......._ v_. I - -o ...--v.„...1 .7--:1_.-..,-- - • .e. 1 • c -9 Cp . -... I ' . . _ ' .. _ -:.:...-..::,:.....„.....--_,..2.3,,,---:,-;-4. 0 0,....1 it.•.t........_ .„,,r,_...i.:__...:::„....-_,...-.... -z..„..1:4-....1.,. .427:1."I - .: ..i.,( -7- -----'1"- .-,••".- - -- -rt...-.--1-•-•.--,:-'.--7 ,- - • -.:-'. ..-'`' . _ 1 ..FA'.- ._ , - . -- It • . " . . . - i - • I . . r-I • 0) 1 ' 7 . • s -S. . . -:.• - .i; . .. . . _ . .,,... . — . - . ! .., ...7,..i _ . _ . _. . ..... ... ..•i • . ...--,_.-_, .... -:-_,,,,i• .,.. ..:..,-. _.• .:2,-- _ :--s-_;:--.14-. . . • :-.;- .__.:— .,.,:•_:—.%. -- --=4: i . - . - .. I I .1. i 1 -- -7---- . i • - - - -"--."--• .:....:. .1 .,.. 1. , . S. .1,..tt..-.-• _ .... • 1 I I i 4..1..f2::::.-tf.'-'1* ..1..-- - - :-:::,-..7.1s--4.- • iki,:._:, ..--A7"-!"*,'‘';'-'; .. -. - — '"*1‘"*"..... .s- I 1 I4.--;3.- '.:2:-. -' -..-- '- 'VtY'......-. - • -:. rr".=...",..--'- - .•.- - .:‘'''',.'..t.4-- • ' -----,4.--"Zt I . _ ._ • .... . . -.. . . . t... •- Al&II . • ; . .• . i- • • ; ._. APPENDIX A4 FLUOROMETRIC STUDY OF I/I IN RIVER TRUNK SEWER, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page. 1 .0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 PROJECT SCOPE 2 3.0 PROCEDURES 4 4.0 DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS 6 5.0 RESULTS 8 6.0 SUMMARY .g List of Tables Table 1 - Section #1 Flow Rate Data Table 2 - Section #2 Flow Rate Data Table 3 - Section #3 Flow Rate Data Table 4 - Flow Monitoring Results List of Figures Figure 1 - Sanitary Sewer Interceptor Monitoring Locations Figure 2 - Fluorescent Dye Flow Rate Measurement Figure 3 - Section #1 Flow Rate Results • Figure 4 - Section #2 Flow Rate Results Figure 5 - Section #3 Flow Rate Results s•• • 1 .0 INTRODUCTION This report presents results of flow monitoring performed on a section of sanitary sewer interceptor located along the South bank of the Minnesota River in Shakopee, Minnesota. The interceptor section under study is shown in Figure 1 . The purpose of this study is to determine rates of inflow/infiltration along the interceptor. The flow monitoring work presented in this report involved the use of fluoresent dye injection, sampling, and analysis to determine flow rates at several points along the interceptor. The flow monitoring was performed during low flow conditions in the early morning of March 22, 1992. The organization of this report is presented below: Section Description 2 Scope 3 Procedures 4 Data presentation and analysis 5 Results 6 Summary This work was completed according to our proposal dated March 10, 1992. • 1 INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY SANITARY SEWER INTERCEPTOR SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA SEC DONOHUE PROJECT NO. M2365.00 APRIL, 1992 PREPARED FOR: SEH, INC. ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA PREPARED BY: SEC DONOHUE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA ,I •. as.. NEU. ....... •mn• mi. .m... MIN •••1110 .II ••••• 11••11 vine INEM a., m.o. iNI on. MEI 2.0 PROJECT SCOPE This section presents the scope of dye injection, sampling, and analysis used to determine flow rates along the portion of the Shakopee interceptor shown in Figure 1 . The flow rate results are used to determine the magnatude of inflow/infiltration. For the purpose of this work, manhole locations are designated by numbers , decreasing from the lift station manhole (MH #37) . Figure 1 shows the locations of all manholes used in the flow monitoring work. 2. 1 PRELIMINARY INSPECTION A preliminary inspection of the interceptor was performed on March 13, 1992 to determine the accessibility of manhole locations and to finalize the project scope. Manhole locations were sighted with the assistance of Mr. Ray Ruske of the city of Shakopee. The results of the inspection are summarized below: • Surcharged flow conditions were observed in Manhole #2 due to large discharges from Rahr Malting over 1 ,000 feet downstream. • The flow monitoring work must be performed during a period of minimum discharge from Rahr Malting. • Manholes #9, #10 and #11 could not be located due to high water conditions and a lack of marking posts. • Assistance from city staff would be helpful in locating and opening manholes during the flow monitoring work. 2.2 PROJECT SCOPE The scope of the flow monitoring work was determined based on the inspection results and the desire to include as much of the interceptor length as possible. The monitoring work .was coordinated with Rahr Malting to limit the malting flow to two intermittant processes. As a result, the interceptor under study was segmented into three sections. 2 Each section was chosen to allow upstream and downstream flow rate measurement without major inputs between monitoring points. Thus, any increase in flow could be attributed to inflow/infiltration. The three interceptor sections monitored in this study are listed below. The interceptor section from MH#8 to MH#12 was excluded from the study due to inputs from Rahr Malting and unaccessable manhole locations . Pipe Upstream Downstream Diameter Distance Section Location Location (Inches) (Feed 1 MH #3 MH #8 15 1149 2 MH #12 MH #25 18 2681 3 MH #25 MH #37 21 3999 3 3.0 PROCEDURES The determination of flow rates by a fluorescent dye analysis is shown schematically in Figure 2. A dye solution of known concentration (ci ) is injected at a constant rate (Qi ) upstream of the monitoring locations . . Flow rates are determined at each monitoring point by analyzing wastewater samples for dye concentration (Cs) and calculating flow rates via the equation (Qi ) (Ci ) = (Qs) (Cs) . Rhodamine WT fluorescent dye is used as the tracing compound since it is non-toxic, nonreactive, and is easily measured at low concentrations. Dye concentration is measured using a Turner Designs, Model 10 fluorometer. Background wastewater samples are collected upstream of dye injection points for preparation of standards used to calibrate the fluorometer. Use of background wastewater in standards preparation compensates for minor losses in fluorescence which may occur through contact with the wastestream. 3.1 DYE INJECTION AND WASTEWATER SAMPLING . For this project, dye injection and background sampling was — performed at two locations (see Figure 1 ) . Manhole #2 was used as the dye injection point for Sections #1 and #2. Due to the relatively large flow input at MH #25, a second dye injection system was installed in the manhole located at the intersection of 169 and Spencer Avenue. Each dye injection location was equipped with a carboy of dye solution, a positive displacement injection pump, and an automatic sampler. Background wastewater samples were collected upstream of dye injection throughout the period of dye injection by an ISCO automatic sampler. The dye solution concentration and pump flow — rate were determined based on an estimate of wastewater flow to yield stream dye concentrations within the sensitivity range of the fluorometer. - 4 Wastewater samples were collected at upstream and downstream locations within each of the three interceptor sections . At each _ location samples were collected using peristaltic pumps sampling �.: upstream of any flow inputs. The intent of the sampling was to allow determination of flow rates over the same relative period at both upstream and downstream locations . Sampling was initiated at MH #3 at 2:50 AM. Samples were collected at 30 second intervals until 3:35 AM at which time a slug of concentrated dye was added. Sampling at downstream interceptor monitoring locations was initiated based on estimated dye travel times and continued until the dye slug was observed. Samples were collected every 30 seconds; however, gaps in sampling did occur due to pumping difficulties and extended sampling periods. 3.2 FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS AND FLOW RATE CALCULATION Each wastewater sample collected from an interceptor monitoring point was analyzed for dye concentration. A flow rate was then calculated for each sample based on the measured dye concentrations and the rate of dye injection. Fluorescence measurement was performed and converted to dye concentration using project specific standards. Standards were prepared by diluting samples of the injected dye with the collected background samples. A second set of standards were prepared using deionized water for dilution to determine the decrease in fluorescence caused by constituents of the wastewater. Comparison of the deionized water and background standards found that the two standards agreed within 967., thus a significant reduction in fluorescence did not occur. • 5 4.0 DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS This section presents the flow rate data, field observations, and the basis for comparing upstream and downstream flows. This information is presented separately for each of the three interceptor sections. 4. 1 SECTION #1 For Section #1 , flow rates were determined and compared at monitoring locations MH #3 and MH #8. The flow rate data for each location are presented on Table 1 . The respective flow rates from each location were compared based on the observed dye slug travel _ time, 17 minutes. Flow rates are compared over a 45 minute period and are shown on Figure 3. 4.2 SECTION #2 Flow rates for Section #2 were determined and compared at monitoring locations MH #12 and the upstream side of MH #25. Flow rate data for each location are presented on Table 2. Flow rates were compared based on the observed dye slug travel time of 61 minutes. As shown on Figure 4, high flows were observed at both locations over short periods due to inputs from Rahr Malting. Due to the resulting flow, pattern, flow rates could only be compared over a 17 minute period between peaks . 4.3 SECTION #3 For Section #3, flow rates were determined upstream by adding the two flow inputs to MH #25. Significant infiltration was observed in MH #25 through several holes on the West side of the manhole just above the crown of the upstream pipe. Downstream flow rates were monitored at MH #37. As shown on Figure 1 , there is a potential for minor flow inputs between these locations at MH #28 and MH #35. However, MH #28 was inspected during sampling at MH #37 and no flow was observed. Also, it is likely that no flow was added at MH #35 due to the small service area and its location within an inactive portion of the city. . 6 Flow rate data for the upstream and downstream monitoring locations are presented in Table 3. Flow rates are shown in Figure 5. Flow rates were compared over a period of 41 minutes based on the observed dye slug travel time and a match of flow patterns. A travel time of 55 minutes was used. • 7 5.0 RESULTS Table 4 presents the flow monitoring results for each interceptor section. Results are presented in terms of inflow/infiltration (I/I) rate and average flow velocity. I/I rates are presented in units of gallons per day per inch diameter per mile of pipe. As shown, the measured I/I range from 1500 to 3608 (GPD/In/Mi ) . These rates are excessive considering that many municipal codes limit the acceptable infiltration rate to 500 (GPD/In/Mi ) . However, it should be noted that the infiltration rates presented were measured during high water conditions. Also, much of the interceptor is surcharged under normal operations of Rahr Malting. The average flow velocity measured ranged from 0.73 to 1 .21 feet per second. These values are low and indicate thatan accumulation of solids .will occur. Several inches of accumulated solids were observed within the interceptor at MH #2 and MH #28. These were the only interceptor manholes entered. 8 6.0 SUMMARY The following statements summarize the results of this I/I study. • Surcharged flow conditions were observed within MH #2 under normal operation of Rahr Malting approximately 1 ,000 feet upstream of the Rahr Malting discharge input. • Excessive I/I rates were measured in each of the three interceptor sections with the highest I/I measured in Section #2. The I/I ranged from 1500 to 3608 (GPD/In/Mi ) . • Travel time measurements found that average velocities were low within each section, especially in Section #2. Several inches of accumulated solids were observed within each of the two manholes entered. 9 TABLE 1 - SECTION #1 FLOW RATE DATA SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MANHOLE#3 MANHOLE#8 ANALYZED MARCH 25,1992 ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 - ELAPSED 11ME LIME OF FLOW RA1 E 11ME OI• FLOW RA IE (MINUTES) SAMPLE (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM) 0 0150:00 AM 73.4 0107:00 AM - 73.9 0.5 02:50:30 AM ' 74.0 03:07:30 AM 75.7 1 02:51:00 AM 74.0 03:08:00 AM 76.3 1.5 02:51:30 AM 75.2 03:03:30 AM 77.7 2 02:52:00 AM 74.6 03:09:00 AM 77.9 2.5 02:52:30 AM 74.6 03:09:30 AM 78.1 - 3 02:53:00 AM 76.5 03:10:00 AM 77.9 3.5 02:53:30 AM 76.5 03:10:30 AM 77.9 - 4 02:54:00 AM 77.2 03:11:00 AM 77.9 4.5 02:54:30 AM 77.2 03:11:30 AM 80.1 - 5 02:55:00 AM 77.8 03:12:00 AM 80.5 5.5 02:55:30 AM 77.8 03:12:30 AM 80.8 6 02:56:00 AM 78.5 03:13:00 AM 82.3 6.5 02:56:30 AM 78.6 03:13:30 AM 81.5 7 02:57:00 AM 79.2 03:14:00 AM 82.1 7.5 02:57:30 AM 79.9 03:14:30 AM 82.4 8 02:58:00 AM 79.9 03:15:00 AM 81.4 8.5 02:58:30 AM 80.6 03:15:30 AM 83.1 9 02:59:00 AM 82.0 • 03:16:00 AM 83.7 9.5 02:59:30 AM 81.6 03:16:30 AM 83.8 10 03:00:00 AM 81.3 03:17:00 AM 83.7 10.5 03:00:30 AM 82.0 03:17:30 AM • 83.2 I 1 03:01:00 AM 82.8 03:18:00 AM 83.7 11.5 03:01:30 AM 83.2 03:18:30 AM 83.7 12 03:02:00 AM 84.3 03:19:00 AM 84.0 12.5 03:02:30 AM 83.5 03:19:30 AM 83.8 13 03:03:00 AM 82.8 03:20:00 AM 83.8 - 13.5 03:03:30 AM 82.5 03:20:30 AM 84.2 14 03:04:00 AM 83.1 03:21:00 AM 83.8 14.5 03:04:30 AM 83.1 03:21:30 AM 83.8 15 03:05:00 AM 80.6 03:22:00 AM 83.8 15.5 03:05:30 AM 81.3 03:22:30 AM 83.8 16 03:06:00 AM 79.9 03:23:00 AM 83.8 16.5 03:06:30 AM 80.6 03:23:30 AM 83.8 17 03:07:00 AM 80.6 03:24:00 AM 83.8 17.5 03:07:30 AM 81.9 03:24:30 AM 86.4 .� 18 03:08:00 AM 80.6 03:25:00 AM 86.3 18.5 03:08:30 AM 82.0 03:25:30 AM 87.5 19 03:09:00 AM 83.2 03:26:00 AM 87.1 19.5 03:09:30 AM 82.3 03:26:30 AM 87.1 20 03:10:00 AM 82.8 03:27:00 AM 87.5 20.5 03:10:30 AM 83.5 03:27:30 AM $8.9 21 03:11:00 AM 83.1 03:28:00 AM 80.2 21.5 03:11:30 AM •• •85.1 03:28:30 AM 90.3 -- 32 03:12:00 AM 86.0 • 03:29:00 AM . 83.9 22.5 03:12:30 AM 86.2 03:29:30 AM 91.1 - TABLE I (CONTINUED) SECTION #1 FLOW RATE DATA SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA - MANHOLE.#3 MANHOLE#8 ANALYZED MARCH 25,1992 ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 ELAPSED 11ME 1 IME OF FLOW RATE 1iME O1-' FLOW RA 1 E (MINUTES) SAMPLE (GPM)' SAMPLE (GPM) 23 03:13:00 AM 83.5 03:30:00 AM 90.7 23.5 03:13:30 AM 84.3 03:30:30 AM 90.7 24 03:14:00 AM 85.7 03:31:00 AM 90.9 24.5 03:14:30 AM 84.6 03:31:30 AM 84.0 25 03:15:00 AM 86.0 253 03:15:30 AM 843 12:00:30 AM 90.7 26 03:16:00 AM 84.3 12:01:00 AM 90.7 �' 26.5 03:16:30 AM 85.1 12:01:30 AM 88.9 • 27 03:17:00 AM 86.0 12:02:00 AM 89.8 27.5 03:17:30 AM 86.0 12:02:30 AM 90.7 • 28 03:18:00 AM 86.0 12:03:00 AM 90.7 - 28.5 03:18:30 AM 85.9 12:03:30 AM 90.7 29 03:19:00 AM 85.7 12:04:00 AM 90.7 29.5 03:19:30 AM 85.7 12:04:30 AM 91.1 30 03:20:00 AM 85.7 12:05:00 AM 91.1 .- 30.5 03:20:30 AM 85.9 12:05:30 AM 90.7 31 03:21:00 AM 87.5 12:06:00 AM 90.9 31.5 .03:21:30 AM 86.2 12:06:30 AM 90.7 32 03:22:00 AM 85.6 12:07:00 AM 88.7 •-- 32.5 03:22:30 AM 84.0 12:07:30 AM 89.6 33 03:23:00 AM 35.1 12:08:00 AM 88.9 33.5 03:23:30 AM 85.1 12:08:30 AM 89.2 34 03:24:00 AM 83.2 12:09:00 AM 90.7 34.5 03:24:30 AM 82.5 12:09:30 AM 88.9 35 03:25:00 AM 83.5 12:10:00 AM 87.5 35.5 03:25:30 AM 84.3 12:10:30 AM 87.1 36 03:26:00 AM 86.2 12:11:00 AM 87.1 - 36.5 03:26:30 AM 85.6 12:11:30 AM 88.9 37 03:27:00 AM 85.6 12:12:00 AM 87.5 37.5 03:27:30 AM 85.1 12:12:30 AM 88.5 38 03:28:00 AM 82.8 12:13:00 AM 88.9 38.5 03:28:30 AM 83.5 12:13:30 AM 88.9 39 03:29:00 AM 82.8 12:14:00 AM 87.1 • • 39.5 03:29:30 AM 82.0 12:14:30 AM 87.1 40 03:30:00 AM 81.7 12:15:00 AM 85.9 40.5 03:30:30 AM 81.6 12:15:30 AM 85.4 41 03:31:00 AM 81.3 12:16:00 AM 86.8 41.5 03:31:30 AM 81.0 12:16:30 AM 85.3 42 03:32:00 AM 82.5 12:17:00 AM 83.8 42.5 03:32:30 AM 83.3 12:17:30 AM 43.8 - 43 03:33:00 AM • 82.9 12:18:00 AM 85.4 43.5 03:33:30 AM 82.8 12:18:30 AM 85.3 44 03:34:00 AM 83.5 12:19:00 AM 85.4 44.5 03:34:30 AM � '82.8 12:19:30 AM 85.8 - AVERAGE 1 2:50-3:35 1 82.3 3:07-3:51 85.7 , TABLE 2 SECTION #2 FLOW RATE DATA SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA MANHOLE#12 MANHOLE#2.)UPSTREAM ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 ELAPSED 11Mb. TIME OF I-LOW RATE. TIME OF PLOW RAI E (MINUTES) SAMPLE (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM) - 12 03:19:00 AM 178.6 04:20:00 AM 119.0 12.5 03:19:30 AM 166.7 04:20:30 AM 135.8 13 03:20:00 AM 153.2 04:21:00 AM 155.0 13.5 03:20:30 AM 153.2 04:21:30 AM 177.0 14 03:21:00 AM 148.1 04:22:00 AM 208.1 14.5 03:21:30 AM 139.0 04:22:30 AM 249.7 15 03:22:00 AM 143.4 04:23:00 AM 298.0 15.5 • 03:22:30 AM 132.9 . 04:23:30 AM 347.4 • 16 03:23:00 AM 119.5 04:24:00 AM 394.9 16.5 03:23:30 AM 114.3 04:24:30 AM 440.1 17 03:24:00 AM 112.1 04:25:00 AM 457.5 • - 17.5 03:24:30 AM 106.3 04:25:30 AM • 462.1 • .18 03:25:00 AM 103.8 04:26:00 AM 453.0 • 18.5 03:25:30 AM 101.5 04:26:30 AM 435.9 19 03:26:00 AM 99.3 04:27:00 AM 398.3 19.5 03:26:30 AM 99.3 04:27:30 AM 358.2 20 03:27:00 AM 97.1 04:28:00 AM 323.1 20.5 03:27:30 AM 95.1 04:28:30 AM 298.0 21 . 03:28:00 AM 91.2 04:29:00 AM 265.5 21.5 03:28:30 AM 89.4 04:29:30 AM 236.9 22 03:29:00 AM 86.0 04:30:00 AM 213.8 "' - . 22.5 03:29:30 AM 84.4 04:30:30 AM 196.5 23 03:30:00 AM 82.9 04:31:00 AM 175.0 23.5 03:30:30 AM 82.9 04:31:30 AM 164.4 24 03:31:00 AM 82.9 04:32:00 AM 153.4 '-r 24.5 03:31:30 AM 84.4 04:32:30 AM 140.8 25 03:32:00 AM 86.0 04:33:00 AM 131.6 25.5 04:33:30 AM 123.8 26 04:34:00 AM 117.5 - 26.5 04:34:30 AM 111.8 27 04:35:00 AM 106.2 . 27.5 04:35:30 AM 104.2 - 28 04:36:00 AM 100.6 ._ 28.5 04:36:30 AM 96.6 29 04:37:00 AM 94.6 29.5 04:37:30 AM 93.7 . 30 04:33:00 AM 92.8 30.5 04:33:30 AM 95.5 31 04:39:00 AM 100.8 - • 31.5 04:39:30 AM 106.8 32 03:39:00 AM 117.3 04:40:00 AM 119.8 32.5 03:39:30 AM 173.3 04:40:30 AM 108.6 33 03:40:00 AM 604.9 1 04:41:00 AM 210.2 33.5 03:40:30 AM 158.5 04:41:30 AM 244.0 34 03:41:00 AM 135.3 04:42:00 AM 295.0 34.5 03:41:30 AM 130.9 04:42:30 AM 299.4• • • ..... 35 03:42:00 AM 123.8 04:43:00 AM 327.7 - • 35.5 03:42:30 AM 123.8 04:43:30 AM 286.9 • • 36 03:43:00 AM . 123.8 04:44:00 AM 251.1 • 36.5 03:43:30 AM 108.8 04:44:30 AM 224.2 - 37 03:44:00 AM 103.8 04:45:00 AM 203.5 . 37.5 03:44:30 AM 103.8 04:45:30 AM 207.1 38 03:45:00 AM 102.6 04:46:00 AM 172.3 38.5 03:45:30 AM 101.5 - 04:46:30 AM . 157.6 TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) SECTION#2 FLOW RATE DATA SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY • SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MANHOLE,#12 MANHOLE.#25 UPS1 REAM ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 ELAPSED 1 IME 1 IME OF 1-LOW RA•I E 1 IME OF l'LOW RAI E (MINUTES) SAMPLE (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM) 39 03:46:00 AM 101.5 04:47:00 AM 147.6 39.5 03:46:30 AM 95.1 04:47:30 AM 138.7 40 03:47:00 AM 95.1 04:48:00 AM 134.6 40.5 03:47:30 AM 93.1 04:48:30 AM 125.5 - 41 03:48:00 AM 95.1 04:49:00 AM 122.2 41.5 03:48:30 AM 95.1 04:49:30 AM 117.5 42 03:49:00 AM 91.2 04:50:00 AM 113.2 • 43.5 03:49:30 AM 91.2 04:50:30 AM 111.8 - 43 03:50:00 AM 91.2 04:51:00 AM 111.8 43.5 03:50:30 AM 91.2 44 03:51:00 AM 91.2 04:52:00 AM 106.4 44.5 03:51:30 AM 93.1 _ 45 03:52:00 AM 91.2 04:53:00 AM 106.4 45.5 03:52:30 AM 91.2 46 03:53:00 AM 90.3 04:54:00 AM 105.4 46.5 03:53:30 AM 91.2 47 03:54:00 AM 93.1 04:55:00 AM 104.2 47.5 03:54:30 AM 91./ 48 03:55:00 AM 93.1 04:56:00 AM 106.2 48.5 03:55:30 AM 91.2 49 03:56:00 AM 89.4 04:57:00 AM 106.9 49.5 03:56:30 AM 89.4 50 03:57:00 AM 89.4 04:58:00 AM 114.6 50.5 03:57:30 AM 91.2 51 03:58:00 AM 91.2 04:59:00 AM 109.2 51.5 03:58:30 AM 89.8 52 03:59:00 AM 91.2 05:00:00 AM 111.8 52.5 03:59:30 AM 91.2 53 04:00:00 AM 89.8 05:01:00 AM 111.8 53.5 04:00:30 AM 91.2 54 04:01:00 AM 93.1 05:02:00 AM 123.8 54.5 04:01:30 AM 93.1 55 04:02:00 AM 91.2 05:03:00 AM 123.8 - 55.5 04:02:30 AM 91.2 56 04:03:00 AM 913 05:04:00 AM 127.2 56.5 04:03:30 AM 93.3 57 04:04:00 AM 95.1 05:05:00 AM 130.8 57.5 04:04:30 AM 95.1 53 04:05:00 AM 97.1 05:06:00 AM 130.1 53.5 04:05:30 AM 95.1 59 04:06:00 AM 93.1 05:07:00 AM 123.8 _, 59.5 04:06:30 AM 91.2 . 60 04:07:00 AM 90.3 1 05:08:00 AM 153.4 60.5 04:07:30 AM 90.9 • 61 04:08:00 AM 90.9 05:09:00 AM . 198.2 61.5 04:03:30 AM 91.0 62 04:09:00 AM 117.3 05:10:00 AM 69.7 • • 62.5 04:09:30 AM 220.5 . 63 04:10:00 AM 477.0 05:11:00.AM 64.3 63.5 • 04:10:30 AM 604.9 . - • 64 04:11:00 AM 477.0 64.5 04:11:30'AM . 192.3 •65 • 04:12:00 AM 63.1 • AVERAGE 1 . 3:49-4:06. 91.8 I 4:50-5:07 114.7 I . TABLE 3 SECTION #3 FLOW RATE DATA _ SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MANHOLE.#a UPS-1 REAM MANHOLE.#25 SPENCER SEC!ION#3 MANHOLE- #37 ELAPSED ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 UPSTREAM ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 TIME TIME OF FLOW RATE TIME OF FLOW RATE FLOW RATE TIME OF FLOW RATE (MINUTES) SAMPLE (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM) (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM) 0 04:08:00 AM 106.2 04:08:00 AM 164.4 270.5 0.5 04:08:30 AM 101.9 04:08:30 AM 164.4 266.3 1 04:09:00 AM 100.8 04:09:00 AM 160.3 261.1 1.5 04:09:30 AM 97.8 04:09:30 AM . 159.7 257.5 2 04:10:00 AM 97.2 04:10:00 AM 159.7 256.9 • 2.5 04:10:30 AM 96.6 04:10:30 AM 159.7 256.3 3 04:11:00 AM 96.0 04:11:00 AM 158.2 254.2 3.5 04:11:30 AM 94.6 04:11:30 AM 158.2 252.8 T - 4 04:12:00 AM 94.1 04:12:00 AM 158.2 252.3 4.5 04:12:30 AM 93.9 04:12:30 AM 156.7 250.6 S 04:13:00 AM 93.9 04:13:00 AM 156.7 250.6 5.5 04:13:30 AM 93.7 04:13:30 AM 156.7 250.4 • 6 04:14:00 AM 93.3 04:14:00 AM 153.9 247.7 6.5 04:14:30 AM 92.7 04:14:30 AM 152.5 245.2 7 04:15:00 AM 91.8 04:15:00 AM 152.5 244.3 05:10:00 AM 320.8 7.5 04:15:30 AM 104.5 04:15:30 AM 153.9 258.4 05:10:30 AM 316.8 8 04:16:00 AM 90.9 04:16:00 AM 151.1 242.0 05:11:00 AM 316.8 8.5 04:16:30 AM 90.9 04:16:30 AM 151.1 242.0 05:11:30 AM 316.8 . 9 04:17:00 AM 90.9 04:17:00 AM 149.8 240.7 05:12:00 AM 309.0 9.5 04:17:30 AM 91.8 04:17:30 AM 148.7 240.5 05:12:30 AM 309.0 10 04:18:00 AM 93.3 04:18:00 AM 148.5 241.8 05:13:00 AM 301.6 10.5 04:18:30 AM 96.6 04:18:30 AM 151.1 247.7 05:13:30 AM 302.4 11 04:19:00 AM 101.5 04:19:00 AM 153.9 255.4 05:14:00 AM 302.4 11.5 04:19:30 AM 107.2 04:19:30 AM 153.9 261.0 05:14:30 AM 303.8- 12 04:20:00 AM 119.0 04:20:00 AM' 153.3 272.3 05:15:00 AM 309.0 12.5 04:20:30 AM 135.8 04:20:30 AM 153.6 289.4 05:15:30 AM 312.9- 13 04:21:00 AM 155.0 04:21:00 AM 153.6 308.6 05:16:00 AM 330.9 13.5 04:21:30 AM 177.0 04:21:30 AM 153.9 330.8 05:16:30 AM 316.8 14 04:22:00 AM 203.1 04:22:00 AM 153.9 361.9 05:17:00 AM 334.5 _ 14.5 04:22:30 AM 249.7 04:22:30 AM 153.9 403.6 05:17:30 AM 347.4' 15 04:23:00 AM 298.0 04:23:00 AM 152.5 450.5 05:18:00 AM 362.4 • 15.5 04:23:30 AM 347.4 04:23:30 AM 152.5 499.9 05:18:30 AM 373.1 16 04:24:00 AM 394.9 04:24:00 AM 151.1 546.0 05:19:00 AM 391.6_ 16.5 04:24:30 AM 440.1 04:24:30 AM 152.5 592.6 05:19:30 AM 409.5 17 04:25:00 AM 457.5 04:25:00 AM 152.5 610.0 05:20:00 AM 437.9 I 17.5 04:25:30 AM 462.1 04:25:30 AM 153.9 616.0 05:20:30 AM 453.7 18 04:26:00 AM 453.0 04:26:00 AM 153.9 606.9 05:21:00 AM 455.3 18.5 04:26:30 AM 435.9 04:26:30 AM 153.9 589.8 05:21:30 AM 470.7 19 04:27:00 AM 398.3 04:27:00 AM 151.1 549.4 05:22:00 AM 483.9 . 19.5 04:27:30 AM 353.2 04:27:30 AM 151.1 509.3 05:22:30 AM 479.6 20 04:28:00 AM 323.1 04:28:00 AM 149.8 472.9 05:23:00 AM 479.6 20.5 04:28:30 AM 293.0 04:28:30 AM 149.8 447.8 05:23:30 AM 457.0^ 21 04:29:00 AM 265.5 04:29:00 AM 149.0 414.5 05:24:00 AM 455.3 . 21.5 04:29:30 AM 236.9 04:29:30 AM 149.8 356.7 . 05:24:30 AM 450.5 22 04:30:00 AM 213.8 04:30:00 AM 148.5 362.3 05:25:00 AM 437.9 22.5 04:30:30 AM 196.5 04:30:30 AM 146.9 343.5 • 05:25:30 AM 423.2 23 04:31:00 AM ' 175.0 04:31:00 AM 148.7 323.7 • 05:26:00 AM 400.4. F 23.5 04:31:30 AM 164.4 04:31:30 AM149.8 314.2 • 05:26:30 AM - 384.5 24 04:32:00 AM 153.4 04:32:00 AM 151.1 304.6 05:27:00 AM 374.2 .. 24.5 04:32:30 AM 140.8 04:32:30AM' 151.1 291.9 •• 05:27:30 AM 375.3_ -- 25 04:33:01 AM 131.6 04:33:00 AM 149.5 281.1 05:28:00 AM 369.8 25.5 04:33:30 AM 123:3 04:33:30 AM 151.1 274.9 05:28:30 AM • 352.2 26 04:34:00 AM 117.5 04:34:00 AM 149.8 267.3. 05:29:00 AM 342.6 26.5 04:34:30 AM 111.8 04:34:30 AM 151.7 263.5 05:29:30 AM 334.5 . 27 04:35:00 AM - 106.2 04:35:00 AM" 151.1 • 257.3 • 05:30:00 AM 325.0 27.5 04:35:30 AM 104.2 04:35:30 AM 152.5 256.7 05:30:30 AM 319.2 TABLE 3 (CONTINUED) SECTION#3 FLOW RATE DATA _ SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MANHOLE#25 UPS 1-REAM MANHOLE#-5 SPENCER SEC:IION#3 MANHOLE#37 ELAPSED ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 UPSTREAM ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 TIME TIME OF FLOW RATE TIME OF FLOW RATE FLOW RATE TIME OF FLOW RATE (MINUTES) SAMPLE (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM) (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM) 28 04:36:00 AM - 100.6- 04:36:00 AM 151.7 252.3• 05:31:00 AM 319.2 28.5 04:36:30 AM 96.6 04:36:30 AM 149.0 245.6 05:31:30 AM 316.8 29 04:37:00 AM 94.6 04:37:00 AM 148.5 243.1 05:32:00 AM 316.8 29.5 04:37:30 AM 93.7 04:37:30 AM 150.9 244.5 05:32:30 AM 316.8^ 30 04:38:00 AM 92.8 04:38:00 AM 151.4 244.2 05:33:00 AM 333.6 30.5 04:38:30 AM 95.5 04:38:30 AM 148.7 244.2 • 05:33:30 AM 342.6 31 04:39:00 AM 100.8 04:39:00 AM 147.2 248.0 05:34:00 AM 362.4 • 31.5 04:39:30 AM 106.8 04:39:30 AM 146.9 253.7 05:34:30 AM 396.6 32 . 04:40:00 AM 119.8 04:40:00 AM 148.2 268.0 05:35:00 AM 409.5 • 32.5 04:40:30 AM 108.6 04:40:30 AM 145.7 254.2 05:35:30 AM 427.5 33 04:41:00 AM 210.2 04:41:00 AM 145.4 355.6 05:36:00 AM 452.1 33.5 04:41:30 AM 244.0 04:41:30 AM 144.7 388.6 05:36:30 AM 453.7 34 04:42:00 AM • 295.0 04:42:00 AM 144.7 • 439.6 05:37:00 AM 453.7 34.5 04:42:30 AM 299.4 144.5 443.9 05:37:30 AM 488.9 ' 35 04:43:00 AM 327.7 144.3 472.0 05:38:00 AM 426.1 35.5 04:43:30 AM 286.9 144.1 431.0 05:38:30 AM 453.7 36 04:44:00 AM 251.1 144 395.1 05:39:00 AM 455.3 36.5 04:4400 AM 224.2 143.8 368.0 05:39:30 AM 490.8 • 37 04:45:00 AM 203.5 143.6 347.1 05:40:00 AM 450.5 37.5 04:45:30 AM 207.1 04:45:30 AM 143.4 350.6 05:40:30 AM 423.2 38 04:46:00 AM 172.3 147 319.3 05:41:00 AM 412.1 38.5 04:46:30 AM 157.6 150.6 308.2 05:41:30 AM 391.6 39 04:47:00 AM 147.6 . 04:47:00 AM 154.2 301.7 05:42:00 AM 374.2 39.5 04:47:30 AM 138.7 04:47:30 AM 144.7 283.4 05:42:30 AM 352.2 40 04:48:00 AM 134.6 -04:43:00 AM 143.9 273.6 05:43:00 AM 347.4 40.5 04:48:30 AM 125.5 04:48:30 AM 143.4 268.9 05:43:30 AM 342.6 41 04:49:00 AM 122.2 04:49:00 AM 145.4 267.6 05:44:00 AM 333.6- 41.5 04:49:30 AM 117.5 .04:49:30 AM 143.2 260.7 05:44:30 AM 329.2_ 42 04:50:00 AM 113.2 04:50:00 AM 143.9 • 257.1 05:45:00 AM 325.0 42.5 04:50:30 AM 111.8 04:50:30 AM 143.4 255.3 05:45:30 AM 316.8 43 04:51:00 AM. 111.8 04:51:00 AM 143.0 254.8 05:46:00 AM 301.6 43.5 04:51:30 AM 142.3 05:46:30 AM 301.6 44 04:52:00 AM 106.4 04:52:00 AM 142.2 248.6 05:47:00 AM 301.6 - 44.5 05:47:30 AM 294.6 45 04:53:00 AM 106.4 04:53:00 AM 146.9 253.3 05:48:00 AM 289.2 • 45.5 05:48:30 AM 294.6 46 04:54:00 AM 105.4 04:54:00 AM 148.2 253.7 05:49:00 AM 301.6 46.5 05:49:30 AM 289.2 47 04:55:00 A\M 104.2 04:55:00 AM 148.0 252.2 05:50:00 AM 287.8 47.5 05:50:30 AM 287.8 48 04:56:00 AM 106.2 04:56:00 AM 145.9 252.1 05:51:00 AM 287.2 48.5 05:51:30 AM 287.8 - 49 04:57:00 AM 106.9 04:57:00 AM , 144.7 251.6 05:52:00 AM 293.9 49.5 05:52:30 AM 300.2 • 50 04:58:00 AM 114.6 0458:00 AM 144.7 .259.3 05:53:00 AM 301.6 . 50.5 05:53:30 AM 329.2 51 04:59:00 AM 109.2 04:59:00 AM •142.2 251.4 05:54:00 AM 325.0 51.5 • 05:54:30 AM 287.8 52 05:00:00 AM 111.8 05:00:00 AM .142.2 254.1 05:55:00 AM 287.8 52.5 • 05:55:30 AM 204.0 -- 53 05:01:00 AM 111.8 05:01:00 AM 139.9 251.7 05:56:00 AM 188.7 53.5 05:56:30 AM 210.8 • 54 05:02.00 AM 123.8 05:02:00 AM 138.7 262.5 05:57:00 AM 232.2 54.5 05:57:30 AM 263.7 . 55 05:03:00 AM 123.3 05:03:00 AM 139.2 263.0 05:58:30 AM 309.0 • 'FA-VERA-UE-0 4:15-4:56" JI- 18).3 11 4:13-4:56 JI 149.0 J . 334.3 5:10-5:51 J 367.5 I H U co co N U w Co T O F— P i Iw T '' to CD to 2 — I~ J • 11--1Z Q 2 cc _. 1 z o 0 o OT CD 0 CO CO Q CC J — a ILL 0 IZ I— .— .—r w CS) C) O —co rn z W - N CO — �Q w H L1.. I0 r _ lO CO N. V Co 6 N CO N. C) ) ID oCit to C7 V N6 n cO LJ CO co O) T N CO o CO W a 10 IQ C IW ILLI I> IQ — .0 US r CD N. CD CD CO to 0 0 U) to to E 0 co c0 4 Li; v v in F, 0 N. CD 0 to to 0 — IZato0 v in r _ r 10 6a &-5 Co v v v iri 12 I E — _ w E.' W z Z Q10 co CO N j W co I~ It TT IIt NK N co to i 1— IQ T 1 h co Z — to ti 00 2 2 = N 2 Z J 0 FCS I O 2 D co I •• Z = 2 o ? - z W w CC W W w w w W Z0 u; O Itu) Q CC Ww ; Q f O W U 0') Z W u) Z w u) i_ Z w Lu Z 0 O zU O U w O UzOZ r 0 N 0 z co D 0 W l CZ -I � Z z O �� z .7:, a ? r- .e) \ o Q . 0 a �. \ � 1;--- -3 o N z r W I ~ Cr CI U 6 m LL `� T o a C° in � o 0 0 ter, rn D I o O 41 o 4 FS a CCI LL \ri z 6 m I -� Q N O �_ W u N r 3 �� 2 O z 7 CO N z o m 0 Q r O � • Z . W N o z c —I w O 0 0 � _ • W • _I CD W \1/4 lk. s.0.1cER Ci)HN N m (.,) H Z O H.Q _IU `; . O rn 0 --I `° 0 Z H U) Oz Z wo p \ W F- 2 Z Q Z 7 Irl m J O _ 0W Z a. Q_ \ W 7 cc . V z rJ YO it t _ �, o. ? Z N i 2 . W • • z \ . rn (/) W . • m. .. \\66\ ,,' . . V) l L ix z o . • W I U p i ro o dO N , c N I— o Qi - 0 o — T U lL Z Qc � I W m U ti 4 CQ Q l\ 11) LL = j C i ` O . 7 = SVz 1 U CL 0 — , 4 I U WH. W x W Q 1 CY (r' LLJ Y .:::::::".t,..: :. . -;:: ..::.::-.:-::: x Li- co I o _1 <iy x I W z Q u) >- 1--- [ 0 1— (f) : : : : Q(f) . . . w . , w i_ f— 7 Oz W z W O U LL 0 w O (L zQ coco 0 Z z0 � Q r (f) --I LU •W wz w — rY o�� j o LI r o ,_ LLJ Qo < _1 ? Li - ° z _ 0 cwn O 0 J i0 LL X c O i U If 0 i a_ IT-7 N 's O W in 4.,vf. / 0 ie D 1: t.-F cir W �+ K O cc � -� co CO LL1 :- -K r f I__ t______+ � , �' _ - 111 < +________V- -c., z CC (r $ ■. OIt 0 __I ii _H. aii N w co Li_ -,-- - _ Lo iii:--)i-----a, 111 , sI f„ iif. _.r LR 2+ liff 4:: 1.--1 ■ o 0c00 c0 c0 c00 c00 N I. d' N (Ido) alb'EJ MOl d O I ' O - + + ` -O _ .J _ D 1 O Q _ (I) + -1Q WIn CC P � � - iii. W N I— •`° _amt- ""c7'/) = 5 2 — LLI i< ir's = . CC2t CC D ii______________ 4<iii - 0 Oa w 1-7 cv _ z o = 0 -tE,_,f____ U ■ _ W o ) c) O I O O O o- O o 0 ( d ) aldol MO-1 d 1 0 nn _ 2?- il (4.I ++ j U) o i--- 4-'°AF NIP" 71- *-1r. W ®, CC 111 mu CY) LO w --f—,i,h4, W < 45c CC CC ++.11 +t N L! 0 In R � N Iraraggral LL 0 ___Ir - I 1-- .. *it t..fs_____. I _ z ■—._ -r 0 1V,114_, I I p p U -T - W ■ U) _ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 in o Lo o . 1.0 o o 1.0 o - CO CD 10 'I' 'I' CO CON N ( d ) alVU MOld 1 MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Alley DATE: June 2, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Councilor Sweeney has requested that City staff research and determine a recommended action for an alley issue. The alley in question is bounded by 8th Avenue, Holmes Street, 10th Avenue and Fuller Street (See attached map). BACKGROUND: A property owner abutting the subject alley has contacted Councilor Sweeney regarding a maintenance issue adjacent to the alley. In order to resolve the maintenance issue, property boundaries and the location of the public right-of-way for the alley need to be determined. This block is contained within four separate plats. One of the plats dedicated an 8 foot alley, but the others did not. There is also the vacated Shakopee Avenue which may or may not have retained an alley. The long and short of it is this alley is a fairly convoluted situation. It may require many hours of City staff time, survey costs and property acquisition costs in order to straighten it out. Both the Engineering staff and Legal staff are extremely busy with other workloads and staff would like the full City Council authorization to spend time and money on this issue. ACTION REQUESTED: Discuss this issue and provide staff with the appropriate direction. DEH/pmp ALLEY PLAT # PLAT NAME 1 ORIGINAL SHAKOPEE PLAT 2 G & 0 ADDITION 12 JASPER & SMITH ADDITION 20 GEIS'S 1ST ADDITION ...--- saw wisiza wilm l0 9 � O 6 - . II II ST, JOHNS 8T 1911 LUTH, CHURCH 1111 willg ill Ili 1Str 1 051 Will% i 1 0 1 111 .v,,.:..___..,,m i a.6 1 il I H----' SO ik 1 II ill l ' 2 1 11111.° reg 1111% \ \ \ 0 rt) n 9 1 El L._ ui 15 20 15 20 15 MI5 PIA1 14 21 14 21 14 ME WINIIII G 7 C . Mi MA Li,. E' t� (4 ISI � i� �� 7 28 i � 7 2$ --- 7 5j INC 6 3 ISI _ 16 8 V- 8 i 1 6 3 7 1 9 z SHAK❑PEE Q 1 - SENI❑R HIGH 126 SCHOOL CONS '1i MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: The Church of St. Mary - Temporary Beer License DATE: May 9 , 1994 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The Church of St. Mary applied for a temporary non-intoxicating malt (3 . 2 beer) liquor license. The license application is for June 25th - 26th, 1994 on the parish festival grounds at 535 S. Lewis St. The application and insurance requirements are in order. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to approve the application and grant a temporary non- intoxicating malt liquor license to the Church of St. Mary for June 24th - 25th, 1994 , at 535 S. Lewis Street. / 3 T CONSENT Attached is a print out showing the division budget status for 1994 based on data entered as of 6/1/94 . The HRA Fund is experiencing costs that will probably exceed the budget as it currently stands. Costs are related to the Stans House project and TIF studies. Not included in the attached bill list but included in the total amount of bills shown on the agenda are the below listed subsistence reimbursements for employees. The employee(s) were away from their normal work site for a business purpose but the meal itself was not a "business purpose meal" or there was no receipt and therefore needs to be paid through payroll as taxable income. Scott Theis $15 . 97 Included in the bills is payment for a Jump Jet Pulsar for the sewer jetter in the amount of $1, 159 . 79 . The machine was budgeted and purchased last year but this optional piece (attachment) was not purchased at that time. Consequently it is not in the sewer budget for 1994 . 06/02/94 CITY OF SHAKOPEE EXPENSES BY DEPARTMENT CURRENT YEAR ANNUAL MONTH TO PERCENT DEPT DEPT NAME BUDGET ACTUAL DATE EXPENDED 00 N/A 0 0 -364 0 11 MAYOR 8 COUNCIL 69,140 68 19,920 29 12 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 185,140 5,247 76,776 41 13 CITY CLERK 116,490 2,842 41,276 35 15 FINANCE 278,020 6,374 96,130 35 16 LEGAL COUNSEL 179,880 4,150 55,356 31 17 PLANNING 405,840 8,843 128,422 32 18 GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 114,460 1,337 43,243 38 31 POLICE 1,376,440 39,946 573,618 42 32 FIRE 865,310 88 94,633 11 33 INSPECTION-BLDG-PLMBG-HTG 183,350 5,107 61,466 34 41 ENGINEERING 346,590 9,918 131,793 38 42 STREET MAINTENANCE 585,050 7,986 160,970 28 44 SHOP 104,530 2,684 43,523 42 46 PARK MAINTENANCE 307,270 7,829 124,219 40 48 REFUSE COLLECTION 513,550 133 163,002 32 61 POOL 150,300 1,071 14,581 10 64 RECREATION 200,010 4,996 71,390 36 91 UNALLOCATED 143,960 0 29,885 21 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 6,125,330 108,619 1,929,839 32 17 PLANNING 360,860 73 114,363 32 TOTAL TRANSIT 360,860 73 114,363 32 12 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 64,870 4,200 50,530 78 TOTAL HRA 64,870 4,200 50,530 78 00 N/A 704,250 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPITAL EQUIP REVOLVING FUND 704,250 0 0 0 a a a4 41 a/ a a s a a w a a s w a a .--i 4 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H z 00 0 co a •N z 0 a w C.) H 0 .-r .7 .7 .7 0 .-I N M .7 0 .n In 0% 0% a > .-1 .1 .7 .7 .7 Cp 0) co ao ao Z 0 0 0 0 0 r. N N 0 0 0 co co 0 co 0 H 0 0 .-i .--I .-1 0 0 O .-1 .d 0 .-1 0 4k C•1 CO 0 0 0 .-I C`1 C'1 0 N '.O .-1 C'1 N Ch H N N .-4 H .--I N N CO .-1 N N N N N CO Co H .-1 .-1 .7 .7 4' .-1 .-I .1 Ch .-1 .-1 .-1 .-1 .-1 .a .-1 z N N .7 4' .7 N N N .7 N N N N N N N A r I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I O N N C7 N .-1 N N N 'O N N N N N N N U H .-1 to In C'1 .-1 .-I .-C N . .-r .-r 9--1 .-1 .-1 .-I .-1 U a% CT H .-1 N 0% C% 0% .4 0% CT 0% 0% 0% CT 0% d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O >4 > >4 al H w Cn 4 4 0 W H P4 H a .a a H H • x .waU Z Ci) 0 a 0 Ci) 0 aaa � w o Cil x � w ~' 0 0 d d d w w w as a. w I 04 HHH 4 co W U .a C 0 CO w ZZZ HO N 0 Z in H0 Z N x w w Cr) H H Ir'1 Cd d Z H H d' In E-1 C4 C4 LG LL. fs. N P4 0 U Ls. Lt. 0 N 0 w w w w w w Ai Ei 04 a4 H 41 44 0 Z O O ! O 0 2 U d O V) 0 C/3 C/3 x a � CO H 0 - Z 0 Z Z H °° Z Z •a o 0 CCO H m m .23m 0) 0 .-1 0 w g CA U EW wCAHEa, w H E+ CA 0 0 0 > H /4 H H 4 O R: H H d 0 O vCa woo U X CsIxa 0Ey 0. Cl`<� � al a. 0a0 a. a .a N it #r 'k iC iC iC * * '3r rr 'r H .7 .7 0 0 C••) 0 a. N CO c0 ,.o a% a% O O N N - .7 a. 'O in in .n 0) a) N G Z .- 1 . "1 N-1 0 O CO .- CT C' 4 00 0 1 M O ' N N Na N N '. 0 0 ' 0 CO ' CO CO a 0 0 .--1 .1 %0 %O N CO C41 .7 N 0% .1 VO %0 0 0 C') C'") -. .7 - as - C•1 C•) N N In '- .? .7 in in .1 1.-1 O C) 4-1 .7 'O N N 'a 'O .1 .--1 N N N 0% N .7 - .-1 .-i .-1 CO V? N N a% C) 0) O C^) N O .7 .7 N r� in in a, C% .-1 .7 %O .1 .-1 f` N N 0 CO M CA • (/). - • C/). • N CO Ch C/). CO N • - .G X .-1 C") .-i Cv - .7 .--1 0 .-1 .--1 .--1 H 0 C/} CO NY C/} 1-1 .-1 .-1 N .i .-1 w M CO• CO CO CO C/> CO 0 C4 0 w H U w a, 0% %0 %0 '.O %0 %0 '.O 'O CO CO CO 0 00 CO 0) H H •-1 -4 .--1 .--1 .-1 .-1 .--1 .-1 .-1 .-4 .--- .-1 .- .-1 .-1 .--1 C.) 4 \ \ \\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ w 0 u1 .n in In In in in in .n In .n in .n in in in W 0 O o 0 o O 0 O o 0 0 0 o O O 0 \ \ \\- \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ a4 U .T .7 .7 -7 4. .1 v .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 ..1- c..) w CT a, CT CT a% CT a, as CT as 0 a, as as a, as W x a, as CT a, CT CT as CT CT a+ 0% CT 0% T 0% CT x 0 .-1 .-r 1-4 .-1 .1 .--1 .-1 .--1 .-r -' .. .i .. .-1 .-1 .-1 U 0 .1 Z • Kl 'O 0 .-I N M r` ca a` O H - .7 v:, %0 %O 'O ,O %.: SO N. N. O X • .. .7 f` t\ N r\ 1. N. N. N. f\ Z U 0 0 In In .n to In In I In rs. . .7 .7 .7 S .7 .7 d - .: O S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,.. 0 0 0 U 0 ,.a a a a a a a a 04 a a a 04 Q` H H H H H H H H H H H H N 0 z go cd a •0 z 0 a w U 1 n 0 in 00 H so n O d d in 0 cn - 0 c0 co o0 O 0' N c'1 O% Z c0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .7 CO 0 H 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n .7 0 H H O 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 .0 0 * 00 Co 0 0 c7 %O ch 0 0 0 0 0 n n rn H n n c0 O% ON H '-4 ch E-1 H .-d c'1 cn H H .--I cn cn N -7 O) z N N .7 .7 N N N .7 .7 .7 .7 d a I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 O N N H %O N N N 4-1 H H H H U H .-1 H n H H H H H .7 Cn N U ON 0' c'1 H 0% 0% 0' 4- cn vO H c'1 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ns H i-1 'j 04 .>a+ ;4 r\-1 W U Z 0 w a a o o .Ha w H A4 H U W W U 0 a V) H 6 H N. . V) CO UZ co Z H 0 .2! Z Z Z V) W co W V) W 0 W W H N \ A O+ 0 0-1 W W E- 0 W W H W o - w w d .a co w w a H H .7 z 0 0 < n Z z W z c.1 cn o a H W In 0 0 a W N N U 04 4T+ x n 0 U 0 a' H Z Z a a 0 w. Wa H .1 U Z U 0 H H ra OU H U 0 D N cn -1 < < H H x 0 U cn 1z z-4 O 0 H H 0 000 Z H < H Z0 . U 0 W < H Z 0 2: a% W W cn H H El c4 H Z - O D Z 0 U W Z W V) Z Z H Z z W o W = V) < < Z rn cUn o H- a Z V)H O' O 0 CO U Z - v) < < < < H N - 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3c 3 3 3 3 El n H H CO CO 0 0 N N .7 .7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 in in N N n n Z 'O .7 .7 in in 0 0 N N H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c'1 c'1 .7 .7 CO CO O• 0 in a` rn N N 0 0 0 0 c0 00 00 00 r-1 .--i 0 0 O O .7 .7 n n O 0 ,n H cn cn V} V} .-1 H .--1 .4-1 C'1 C') C'1 C'1 N N C7 1 n n 0 0 H H cn cn CV Co 00 VY N N N c') C'1 LA in N N VY o n n 4.--1 r-1 H H H r-H O C/} - - - - V> V} Cl)- V} CO. V> V} VY VY V> V> N VY V} . x in in '0 VO H 0 CO. V> V> C.1} W 0: U W H V) Cr) Co co as in .n to is to _ .d .--1 .4 H E+ H .-1 N N N N ti N 0 0 0 0 U < . \ \ \ \ \ N. \ \ \ \ \ \ Cz) 0 I in an in in in in in an so '0 '.0 'D C4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 x , \ \ N. \ \ \ N. \ N. \ N. \ • U , .7 st .7 - 4 - - .7 -4.- u 'U W , a' a, a% 0' a, a, a a, a, O. a% 0' W = , a, Q, a+ CT O, O. a O' a' O, a\ 0% = U . H .-d .-I - .--i ,-44 •-• __. .-. .-d .--1 .-i U O 4-1 Z : N cn - CO 0' 0 .-1 N C1 n CO 0' 0 H , n n n n n 00 CO 00 c0 b 0) Co O' 0 ]L • n n n n n n n n n n n n n Z 0 in as in .n as in in a-% .n as in .n in 's) , .7 - v' .7 .4 N. v - .: ." .7v4- 0 - , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 o U .a a a aaCLI a a aaaaCi. a aaaa a a Ch .4 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H z N1 0 Cb a 0 a W 0 H N O. 0 O 0 e4 In N N N N N 01 Ch 01 C1 7 0 0 0 .-i .-C .--1 r-1 C. e4 .--1 .-1 .-1 1--1 CO .-1 r♦ .-I .--1 .-4 :> C"') CT C. C. O. C. CO C. C% C. C. C. O 0% 0% 0% C. �D O. Z In O 000 O C*) 00000 rm 0000 . O O H N 0 0 0 0 O -7 0 0 0 0 0 .7 0 0 0 0 CO O 0 O 000 O en 00000 eh 0000 .-r 0 4E 0 0 000 O O .4 .-1 rdr-i .--1 O 0000 O O r4 C. 7 7 .7 .--1 7 N N N N N 7 7 7 v1 .--i 7 7 E M 7 N N N N N of M M Ch Cr) N N N In N N N z 7 M 7 7 7 7 7 7 .7 7 7 .7 7 7 .7 .7 7 .7 7 1 1 I I I r 1 I r l l r I 1 1 r 1 1 1 O N ri e-1 r-4 .--1 r-1 N r-4 r1 r-1 .-4 .--I vl r4 N .--1 .--1 e--I 4-1 U CO 7 .-1 C"1 ri 141 C") N N .7 .-1 C. N 7 r 1 N N - .-1 U 7 ..O Ce) Ce) 7 C. N .-1 01 .D C"1 r1 .D 7 C") C°) M .D -.7 4C 0 O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W 0 0 0 U U 0 U U U U W z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z H W Q,' <4 <4 CO d Q < 6 CO z Z z w z z z z w z z z a z w w w H W W W W H W W O W O E E E .a E E E E .] E E H CO H Z Z Z a Z Z ZZ a Z Z H W N g g g g N x z x U 0 U E E E C9 E w W W W W E E4 E E 0 E E C/) H W Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z W CO a4 W W W H W 0 0 0 0 0 W W W W H W W 0 CO XXX E Z xxxxx Z XXXE = Z w a4 a a a d a a a a a a a a a a 44 a a 0 x H H H W 1 44 W W W W H H H H H H a - - - 0 0 : mow 0 Cd E 0' 0' 0' a 0' W w w w W 0' 0' 0' 0' a 0' 0' a 0 w w w O w E EEE E W w w w 0 w w Z 0404 c4 04 H H 0 0 0 0 0 V) CO V) f/) H H H H rYr ,41-I al al CI 43 0 r 3 pp;; H F ¢ ¢ <4 Q a 0 c4 CA 2 r-1 r 1 d W 0 ZZZZ Z H •• c4 U U U U C4 W W W 41 W CO O O O O 0 0 1.x ' Z Z Z Z Z CO H H H H H • .-4 a x H rrr C.) 00000 \ EEEE E fa-, Z c/a c4 o4 od W Z <4 d' <4 d' C' 1-+ • W W ODO Ca C4 C4 1111 1 Zzzz Z W 0 H 0 c4 c oc1 Ca H H H H H H 0' 7 H w Z Z Z E .7 .] .7 .' g .4 EEEE E a H EEE wE U .-7 .7 .] - .-1 Z r o. Cm, a.' 6 ' Q ' < W W W M W O O OO O O C. CO co 0 U U U 0 U U U U U U 0 0 0 0 0 U -1 N iC iC iC -J'. n n r r IC E 0 0 0 O O O O 0 .D .D .--1 H N O N .D N N N. N N 00 O .D .O O O In vl Z 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 .-I rl M M O. 7 C. .--1 O. C') CT CT C1 vl O .--I O 00 00 00 00 Z• 0 O 0 un vl In un O O 4--1 r4 0 O O vl O N O O N N r- 7 .D O 00 co CO co CO 1•1 N N N N 7 7 .O vl CO CO 7 7 .-1 N r-1 CO r4 7 01 M 7 N CO in O CO CO 00 00 N N C? N V} V> V} r-r N N VY V} V} V} 0> C/} V} .-4 V> V> N .-1 O Cb r4 C? VY r4 r4 O 0> 0> 0> C/> C/)- C/> CA - - C/? C/> .0 x C1 .-1 v; E 0 V>• Vy N W x W' 0 W E Cn al ri .-1 r1 r1 r4 r1 r1 r1 r-1 ri ri r4 H r-1 r4 r-1 .-i r-i r-I H E O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C., ' \ \ \\\ \ \ \\\- \ \ \\- \ \ \ W 0 1/40 .D .D .O .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .0 .D .D .D .O .D .D C4 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O 0 OL \ \ \\\ \ \ \\\\\ \ \\\\ \ \ U - 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 .7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 .4- U U w CT CT CT C. CT C• C7. CT CT CT C' CA CT CA CT CT CT CT O• W x 0. 0, CT C. C. CT C. C. C. C. C+ ch CT C. CT C. CT as C• = 0 r-1 .-1 .--I ,4 r♦ r4 ,4 ra - r•1 .-1 r-1 ,-t .-+ U O ' r) Z . 1-1 N Cl .7 In .O r- 00 C' O H CT CT CT CT 0' C• Cm CT CT O U Y . I 1", N N N N r\ r.. N- 00 Z U u1 In In In In v1 In .n In Ln ",.D CZ r 7 7 7 7 7 .' 7 0 r O O 0 O O O O O C: O 0 0 . a a s a a a a a a a a a a a a a Q, H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 4' O z d0 z 0 co a V 0 a W co 00 H to to %0 .7 N N co 0% 0% 0% 0 o '-i H H M .-1 N r-1 .-1 H H N CO N7 0. 0% 0% 0% 0 0% CO 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% N 00 .O N Z 0 0 0 N 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0% N 0 - H 0 0 0 O. O .O O O O O O in r-I N 0 0 O O M O M O O O O O M .-1 -7 N #k 0 O O O O O O O to 0 O O O O O .--1 0% .-I r-1 .--1 r-1 to .--i ri M .-1 N7 .7 .-4 N7 E+ N M N M N M to N N N N N N N .O Z 47 47 - 47 N 47 .-4 -? ' 4' .t - - rl 'J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 .-d .--1 M .-1 0 e-1 e-i M M CO .-i N r-4 r1 r-1 O .-I M CO to -7 0% 0 N N N N .-4 .7 N 4-1 O .-1 e-1 .-1 .-I CO e-i 0 07 0 .0 M .O -.7 t!) N d 0 0 O co O. O 0. O O O O 0 0 0 0 Ear U al co co W o z z w w > Hw z w a COas CO z ZH O H C4 d C4 H H W W H o a 0 a W >4 w CA a a E- Ea a H a x a CA d cn W a H a Z z a H a U a a 0 a z a H H a 04 05gH N \ COn d W d Ce-4 o-1On z cn N co co co co O O O co co Cn 0 H H 0 H EA Z Z Z H H Z a 0 Z Z Z Z Z W H W H Cl) VI A H d Z H W W H W co H C4 H Cn 0 C) H H H H dH z z H z a' w g w 41 w cd. w W a o4 0.4 H H c4 H W Z W O O O W W E-I H W p D W ao a x ixx azo a a aa c. o co o 04 0 04 a o PO 0 W W 0 W x W 0 0 0 x d <C <4 0 Cn 0 s a 0 Z 0 .3 •2s .3 H w z E .-1 H O ca H C.) W Z Ei Cn W x E+ Et H Z Z Z a4 0 Cl) 0a 0 o x x o W x a o 0 o co d H '•• z H H `3 0 3 H a a 4 `� W "' H a 0• W A A Z W x .3 W W W E• ,o Cn W O > O O d H Z A A A 0 H Z a 1-5 '7 0 E-c a W Z Z Z 0 G4 H A H H H W C/) d d d a W H aoFaw waawX x a w ww cn 0% 0 0 a W W 0 cY. A C) H H a 0% U U 0 0 A 0 0 W W W W 04 04 W 04 .-i N -3c is •C 4C is jC -K •3C •3c * -k E+ 0% 0 O% to to 0 O O O O O .O .O in M N 0 N N N N 0 0 i� N O% Z to 0 to N N 0 0 M M - -7 00 CO M .O to to 0 0 N N .O .O .O .O N O• 0 0 to O. a O. 0 0 0 0 r-1 .--1 0 0 --0 N r-I CO .7 - N N -7 . .O .O O. r7 V> M M N N 0 0 O 0 M M to to - to M N to to O CO N C' O. O. to V> V> V> V> 0 0 M M M M 0 0 N .O V> 0% .-1 .-4 V> V> rJ .--1 .-1 .-1 r♦ O - - - - - - - V> Ch V> V> V> V>N V> V> - .0 p4 N N M M - .--4 to to ra H U -1 r1 V> V> V> N C/> V> V> W V> v} x a 0 W Ei _ Cn W .-i .-1 .r ••••4 .-Ir1 .--1 .--1 .-1 ri .� .-+ 4-1 r i H E• 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 d \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ W A .O %O %0 .o .O .O .O .O .0 .O 40 .O .O .O .0 c4 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a4 \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ a4 U - • - - 0 0 ` - 7 -0 - - NZ 0 W 0' 0% ON rn a as o a 0% 0 a rn rn a O+ W x O. O. 0% 0% O. O• O. O. 0% O. O. 0% 0% O• O. x U 4--1 r1 .-1 .-1 .-1 .-1 .-i .-1 .-1 .-1 r4 r-1 .-1 0 0 _ a Z N M .7- to .0 r-- 00 0% O H O O O O O O O O O r1 co x Co a) 0) O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Z 0 . to to to to to to to to to .!. tr. Cs) I - .7 J J - .7 .T 0 O O O O O O O O O O O U U ►.a a a a a a a a a a a a a < H H H H H H H H H H H H In a z 00 0 co A. 0 a w U r H .--1 .0 N cn .7 in .0 N co 0. O N .-1 N N N N in 0. N N N N > 0% VD 0% 0% 0% C. %0 0 to C. C. C. Z 0 N O O O O .7 C) 0 0 O O H 0 CO 0 0 0 0 r-1 .n 0. 0 0 0 0 1n 0 0 0 0 .7 .7 N 0 O O * O O O O O O O O In O O O cn .--1 cn 0. e7 .-1 C. .. cn M en .-i Hz cn N cn cn cn cn cn cn .7 cn cn cn I I I I I 1 I . . I I I O M e-i r-1 .--1 9-1 N H H r-1 r-1 H H U e--1 N N '0 Cn H N 0% N N N Cn C) 01 cn M r-1 cn 'D M r-1 .--1 cn H cn Q,' 0 O O O O vO O O O O O O 04 til c4 H U H U H U W Cl) p47 . W H \ H r] Ccl W H U W U a] U ^+ .-a eJ cD U 0 > Z Z H Z 0 Z CY. O O: D Z Z CLi o W .-a W o W W o W a al W W H E-i a H x H Cl) x v) \ H H N H Cl)H Cl)CLi CUH ) Cl) a 0a Z H H a H Cl) C/) C/) \ Cl) d \ @ O v) cn d aG ca ca W as Z W Z H 04 a) Z U O 0 a U a O U O H D D O Cl) cn z Cl) Z CO 1-4 Z H a Cl) Cl) H W N. H \ W N. Cl) W Cl) H \ \ G) A .a H ii-1 a 0.1 Cl) C4 Cl) a a a Cl) tzl W WWWWg > > 11. cn > > a g o g a o aco g g cc H o H U H a C) a Cl) H E+ a U x z 9 H H a z H W U Z ?+ H w x > a • Cd co 7+ C0 W C.) H Lx) off 0 a 0 z Z pH-1 0 HH H Z H O U H H '7 U Zu!S A O 0 ILI CO .a H Z H Z H Z w o cE_ .7 x p-1 >+ D 0 x z A < o a. 0 <4 .a 0 < A W 0 U A as w 0 0 0 x x x H ti x x .a N $ * is * is is is is * * * * * H 0. .0 .0 T 7 •0 .D O O In In .4. .7 O O O O O O 0. a. .o .0 O O Z N .t) In a a. co co 0 0 .7 .7 .7 .7 O O N N 0 0 u1 In c-': 01 N N RA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 0 0` .0 .0 0. a• N N In u1 .0 .0 .0 .0 0 0 .7 .7 O 0 N N .7 .7 N C` •1 in Cn el O O N N .0 .0 cn el O O O O CO co 01 cn N N C41 0) co CO H or or H H H H or C/> C/> C/> H r-1 V1 1n CO CO C/} C/> .-1 H C\ N CO CO C• aL .a v> CA N f..1). - .. .. - t/> N. v> q> <1.. C/> CA v> cn C1 .--1 .--1 H U or ctr or or yr G*) x GG U W H V) Cr) .a Hi H H .-1 H .--1 .--i .-1 r-1 .--, H H O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O < N. \ \ \ \ N. \ \ \ \ \ N. W A .D .0 .0 .D .0 .0 .0 .D .0 .D �. •D CL 0 O O O O O O O O O O O aL \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ aL U .7 d .7 .7 .7 s., .7 v .7 .7 U W as O. as a. a• O• 0• 0• a• a• c a+ W x . a• a. 0. rn 0' as 0. 0. as a• c a• x U i .-a .--. .--1 H .-1 .--1 .-1 r-i .--i r, 0 O .-1 Z , N C1 .7 V1 .D 1. CO a• 0 .-1 N :"1 H . H .-1 .--i H .--i .-1 r-♦ C.. CN N ti C\ 0 . CO CO co CO co 00 co CC CO CO CO CO 0 Z U . .!1 in i/1 V1 I/1 ,!1 In .!1 i!1 J1 L!1 11 =1 .'�. W .7 .7 .7 v .t .7 d .7 .: v d v O x , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 U t.a a a a a a a a a a a a a as a a a 4 H H H H H H H HHHHHHH H H H .O `J Z 0 00 Cd a •g z 0 a CO U H 0 r-1 CV Cn . d d d d d - ten t` .o O on M on Cr) O. CO C'1 on C' on C7 on on on on on ',7 a O. 0 O. O. .--I rd 0% 0% 0% 0% O. 0% O. 0% CO 0' Z 0 0 O. 0 0 CT r1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O H 0 0 PO 0 0 d O. 0000000 O O 0 O 0 d O 0 01 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV 0 % 0 0 0 0 CV 0 0 0000000 O 0 0 ten ,.-1 ten H N r-1 d CO CO CO CO CO CO CO r•I r-1 f-I H in Cl U1 CV CV CV CV 01 01 Cn M C1 01 Ch 01 Cr) 01 Z .7 .7 .7 N d .7 - d d d J .7 -7 d d d d I I I I I I I t I t I I I t I I I O .-d r-i .•1 O on .-1 .-I .-1 CO .-d CV .•-1 .-4 r-i r-I Cn .-i U CV CV r•i d .7 CV CO CO CV r-1 CO CV .--I CV r 1 CO 4.-1 U Cn r♦ d CO .--i d r-I r-I .O on r-1 d .O on d .-i Cn d 0 0 O a. 0 0 0 0000000 O 0 0 CO U U CO CO CO H rl 04 CO d H H H CO CO CO Z Zaa CO COW CO WWWWWWW COW COW H COd p+ Z 0000000 CO Cn Cn E-4 a ta a H HHHHHHH H d CO CO CO 7 7 t-] .-] 0-104 o4 04 04 od 04 04 d d d C4 Z 0 ra W W W W W W W Z Z Z O0 El Z H Z Z Z ti N U N Cn to H H H CO CO Cn CO w H CO >4rrra4 >4 >+ Co CO Cn A Z to Z 0 E Z E E E E E E E CO Co CO a CO a c4 Q� a HHHHHHH CO CO CO H L.i H 0 p'+ H 0-7 1-7 rl rl 0-7 -) .4 L*+ O. a O O O E CO O HHHHHHH O O O 0' c>r 0' 0 a 0' EEEEEEE 04 04 a CO a CO U z O CO O O O b 0 0 0 a a a 0 H U U a Z Z 0 El CO d a z 0 Ho Z CO •• C4 COOO H a CO C CO CO H C.) O OA >+ Ed .A] U CLI(-40 0 0 0 0 0 0 - W Z E 1 UQ co - to UUUUUU0 d r CO O. CO CO CO Z 7+ Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn CO Cn E d 0 0 > w a Cl) E 0 Cl) CO ddddddd 0 3 H d r Z CO A 0000000 CO Z a Co a CO CO x p4 O WWWWWWW CO 0 0 0 A o4 CO d C4 ZZZZZZZ Z 0 a d oo CO Z O 9 Z E ZZZZZZZ Z O. WW CO H H H H H H H H Z Z CA 1 1 1 ,-1z z ZZXZZZZ Z Z z r-I N * 'ter .x * * r .. .3 .. •3 E CV CV O O CO CO O O •O .O N N .O .O r-i M .O ten CV CV CV .--1 .7 .7 O O a O. Z CO CO co O O O ten to O• O. VD .O CV CV CO CT O 01 .--1 CV CT d O O ten ten 01 C1 !r O . . . O O CA O• r, r, CA CT r-i .-I to U) CV N d d on in d O co Cn O .c O O to to '0 .c In Z ten ten CV N CV N .O .O r-1 .--1 O` O• d d .O as O• CV CO C'n .--i 0 r 4 .--i CV CV tel ten d h s to ten C'1 Cn .O VJ CA N C> Ch co- t? t` co. N co. .--1 co- .-1 on V> v> co- O CV CV O V> V} V} co. 01• V? V} V1 V> VY V} - V} co. H E U V> W G4 C) CO E CO CO .--I r-I .--i r-1 .� r-i '--1 .--i .-I - .-1 r•I .-I .--1 .--i .-d .-1 H E 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O a < \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\ \ \ \ CO 0 .o .O .o .o .o .o .0 .c .O .O .o .o .G .o .o .O V) 04 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\ \ \ \ • U - .1 d .7 .7 - .7 d d -; d .7 .7 d d .7 O CO CT O. as O• O' O• a O. O. O+ O` CT CT CT CT CT O` CO = O• CT O. O• a O• CT O` O. O+ as a O. O• O• O. O• 'y'. 0 .--1 .--. .-1 --t .... --1 .-4 ...4 .-1 .-. -d .-I .-1 -- .-1 .-1 --1 C.) O t ..a Z , to .D t` CO O• O CV :^ ` to H . N CV N N CV C^ C: C) C'1 C": C''1 U X , CO CO CO CO CO CO co CO CO CO W Z U , ten ten ten ten tel .P1 to tel .e. Jl u'1 CO . - d d d d - d d - v 0 = , 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O U U .a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a s a d H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H z 00 0 Ai a 5 z 0 a w U H I .0 CO a% a% 0% 000000 O H .--1 N O M .7 .. M C'1 C'1 C .t .t .t d .t .t CO .t .t .t 'J O. N .O CT 0, 0, 0% 0% 0% C. O. 0, C. O. N O. C. 0% Z 0 en In 0 000 000000 In a0 00 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a0 N 0 0 0 0 N 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 * 01 C O el 000 000000 0 0 00 0 M Ch H M N N N .-1 .--1 .--i .-1 .-1 .-1 O. .t .-1 .-1 .-1 F d .t N .t .O .O .O cn c'1 cn c'•. c'1 on M N en en en z .7 .7 .Y - .7 s -t .7 -t .7 .7 .Y .7 4' .7 - .t .7 I I I I I I I I I I I1 . I I 1 0 .--1 .-1 .-1 .-1 CO 0 .-1 .-1 N. .-1 .t in 4..1 N .-1 .-1 .-1 N O N .0 01 .7 0 .-1 .-1 4...1 N N N 0 M N M .-i N 0. C.) .t .-1 M .O cn e7 e7 .7 .O In .0 .0 N .-1 .-1 0 01 ri d 0 0 0 0 0' O. 0' 0 •0 .0 .0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w w w w w w P4 0 w w w 000000 F Z U U U Cn H H H H H H \ d H H H w Cn VI Cn .7 7 > > .7 7 .a Z P• D Z H w w w C>!. P+ Pi cYi P+ P4 O w cd c4 c4 o a w w w w w w w w w 0 F w w w H P.. W W W CO CO CO CO Cn C/1 x Z CA ell v3F ;Li UH P.4 o FFF aaaaaa cn as a H Cl ZZZ d < d « d \ z < d < Pi w w w z z z z z z w z z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 F 0 0 0 CO Z d < < H H H H H H Z Z H H H w H C/) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cn CA w w CA (4 co A F .-1 .-1 1-1 co to V) C/3 C/3 Cn a' x CO cO Cn < w w w w w w w a w w w Cl) V) V) U U U W W W Cr. W W W H W W Go W W W W V) C) CI) 000000 Z J 00 0 O a a H H H P: P4 44 P: Pi P: o O' P: w 04 0 A o 0 W W W a a a a a a CJ w 0a P. C.) z H CZ = z a c:l w o 1-1 N 000000 Pa FF g H F Cn ZZZZZZ O Cl) Z Z > -t 0 Q ,' E x x H H H H H H U W 0 0 L .-1 O 0 N4 UUUUUU >+ F P: 0 0 a g N4 N4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl) A 0 2 0 0 U 2 Z 2 VI Cn VI Cn Cn Cn 0 >+ 1:: w < .-1 A w .23 << < Cn cn cn Cn CA Cn .--) C/) 2 Z H 0% z H W 0 cocnaa ddd « < 0 O 0 O > w x d w F F F 1113 <4 I4) 0 0 0 x W HH H W a a c) N N U Z 2 Z Cl) C/1P. 1-1 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 H H X I .a .7 W F o4 P5 04 VI Ci) V) V) Ci) Cn Z L' 0 00.. z z zzz 000000 0 0 � a 04 .1 F 0 0 0 0 In In 0 0 0 In In 0 -t 1-1 .--I .-1 O. In 01 0 0 .--1 .-1 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 0 0 0 'O 1/40 0 0 O N N In .7 .0 NO N C"1 N 0 0 0 .t d N O• .-1 0 0 O• 0 N N N N .--I .-1 0 0 In .-1 In N .O .0 N N .-1 .--1 .O In u1 01 01 � at In In '7 0 0 - 7 N N .O .0 N CO M 0. 0. .0 N .t M 0. 0 0. O. .0 .0 Cti C0 O In In 1-1 .-i .-1 .-4 Ch V> .--1 .-1 .--1 .-I .--1 .7 N N O. -t .t In 0 N N Ci> V} - .7 O. 01 01 O C/? C/> N C/> V} C/Y C/> C/} C/} N Cr} CA • • • C/> • C/> V} C.O. (/> C/> - - .0 a4 00 0 .7 In '--I 4--1 F 0 co. .-1 C/> N V> Ch. Gal V> C/> x P4 0 W F Cl) W .-1 .--1 .-1 .--I .--1 .--I .-1 .-1 1- 1- . i 1 -1 . . -1 -1 .--1 1-1 .--+ .--i .-1 H F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 < \ \ \ \ \\\ \\\\\\ \ \ \\ \ ccl A .O .O .O .O .D .O .O .O .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .O .O .0 04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a4 \ \ \ \ \\\ \\\\\\ \ \ \\ \ N4 U .7 .t .7 .t .7 .t d -7 -t .t v" .7 .t d .7 - - 0 ctl CT as O. CT C. 0, 0• 0• 0. 0, CT 0, 0' 0' 0' CT 0. C• w x 0% CT O. O. 0. C. O. 0, O. O. 0. 0. O. 0. 0" C• O. ON x U .-1 .-1 1-1 .--I .-1 .--I .-1 .--1 4-4 .a 1-1 .-4 .-1 .-4 ..1 .-. U 0 .-) Z •O r\ CO 0• 0 .-i N C'1 .7 al H VI C-1 01 C'1 .; .7 .7 .7 .7 0 aL CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO Z U In In In In In .n In .n In .n • W -t s .7 -t s v .7 .7 O X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • ,a a a a a a a a a a a a a s Q,' H H H H H H H H H H H H H CO 'J z CU 00 0 CO 0.4 •N z 0 a w U H el 7 in .a n 0 CT .-i M N 7 -4- 0 0 7 7 7 7 7 in 7 in to to to to ',r O% a% a. a. .0 a. 0% O% O% a% 0, O. O% Z 0 0 0 0 .-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 O O O n O O O O O O O O O O O O .-1 O O O O O O O O it in 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 .-1 C) e7 in en C') cn 4-1 .--1 ,--1 .--1 a0 OD H N en N in N C) M en en en C') C+) M Z 7 7 .7 .-1 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I 0 M .-i N H H H .a .-i .--1 In N H H U N N a0 0 co N n en .a N U) U) N C.) 7 en .-1 0 .-1 en .-1 .-1 cn .-1 7 .--1 7 !,' O 0 O 0' O O O O O O O O O W W W U 0 0 o U 0 D > D 0 E+ H W H H E+ Cl) Cl) Cl) 0 0 R4 H H V) H H Cl) Cl) i/) . d' . c4 c4 an g CO cd Cl) D Cl) C/2Cx) /) H H H C/) C Cl) d 0 0 Z . Cl) co Cl) >+ ?+ A H -) 1-4 H HH .a .a 0 Cl) Cl) Cl) H H C4 CLI a 4 r.4 EW1 H W r1 ' .) 0 0 0 H H 0 CO a co Ems-. w a a04 w p.P.) 0 O4 H a a g Z oG Cl) x Cl) a H 0 0 A a s 0 H .a 0 U Cl) 00 O O 7 U 0 d 0 U H C/) Cl) >4 >4 .d 0 C.) H A W w W H H A IY.. H CY, 0 0 C4 a 0 U) H H r1 0 . 0 H H E-4 H W W . U U U a. W W W 0 Z N 0 E-1 x W W W W 0 ' W Z W Z ti El U 0 r7 0, a4 0.1 a WU H 4 H H H O O O O 7 0 H w .a Cl) x 0 0 0 O. H H H 0 0 U U U U x x ai a a lx w ax Cl) C/) Cl) Cl) V) V) V) VI H N * .c * .C .3. .k .3c . is ;c '3C H .0 .0 N N 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 0 0 O in Cn CA CA 0 0 0 O a0 Z Ch Cl) 0 0 in in 0 0 n n in in 0 0 in 1n a0 a0 0. a• 0 0 Is. H 00 O• 0 H H n n In in N N a s 7 7 0 0 O. CA C1 c`') .a .0 0 0 .0 7 0 ►) 7 7 in to n n Cl) C') a. a N N til in H .-i H .-i 7 -1 0 0 Cn H n 00 CO N N CA CO. 7 7 V> VI. N N V> CO- CO. V> H .-i C') C') Cn in V> Cl) M O V> V> V> V> . . V> V> V> CO. . . . - V> V> ,C '?4 .0 .0 in N .--i H H 0 V> C> V> V> V> V> W x Cd 0 w H V) W .-1 .-i .-, .-4 H r1 .-i .--i ,-, .-i .--1 .-1 .-d H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 6 .. .. \ \ \\ W A .0 .O .0 '0 .0 .0 .O .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \. s., \. �S U 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 - 7 7 7 7 U W rn a+ C' C' Cr, rn ON 0' Cr rn CA Ch Cr, W x 0' 0% a, C' as CA o. 0' CA CA. o. o. a. C:) , .-i .-+ .--4 .-1 .--4 .-1 .-4 .--, ri H .-1 H U 0 1 .-) Z . .0 1- co CT 0 .-1 N C') 7 .n .D n H . 7 7 . 7 in 4n V1 in .1 in in Ln U aL a0 a) co co cc co U) 00 co U) cc co Z U ' in in in in an in in in in in in in A W . 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 - 7 - 7 O x . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O 0 U .a a a a a as as a a a a a a. aa 4 H H H H H H H H H H H H 1-4 H 1-4 H a. 4)0 0 0 id a •I O a W 0 H in .o N a) C. C% 0 0 .-1 N C) .7 in .0 .0 .0 0 in by in in in In .o .o .o .0 .o .0 .0 .o .o .o a. C% C. C. C` a. 0% 0% a. C` a% a. C. C. 0% 0% Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O * In O O O O 0 .-i .-1 0 0 0 O C) O O O .•1 en in en C) en r•• r` .--1 .--1 NT C) 01 C' r1 en H N en en C) N N 0 0 M C) N M .7 e") C) C) Z .T .7 .T .T .T .T N N .T .T .T .T .7 .T .T .T I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 el eh .-1 M CO .-1 0 .-1 N .••1 .-1 .•1 .•1 .-1 .o .0 U N N N .-1 N N .-1 0 N N .T N .-1 CO f\ N C.) .T .O .O C) .O .T N 0 C) en .T e7 en NT .-1 .-1 4 0 %0 O O O O C. C. O O O O O O O O W W 0 CO Z Z H H Z W W H W H H U D D Z 0 O :+ O Z x x Z x x CO Z Zc4Z 0 CO cn CO W CO E. CO 00 00 00 E H a CO Z Z `�' `�' Z COCCOA `" CO a 00 to H HH a a H H .aH HC4 0O. PO. rya p ) Z Z 0 CA CA 00 AZ A U cn \ \ O a s 0 0 E•+ O CO .] C9 CD cn U 0 CO CO H H Z CO CO H Cn CO C Z Z \ Z Z cn cn W \ \cn \ 0 H H H r] HH 00 CO CO Z .-a r70a Cd H H CO A 0 E E•+ CO W a W W W W W Z Z P. .-7a cx. tomo H �> CO > G4D> A. a El 00 00 00 0 oa4 a w E+ a E+ a E+ 0 H gil0 0 O 0 U U z 0-I 0CO ► y�y CO cn txt 0 4.1 C4 Z X Z H H Z 00 •ct Cn COCOCn 4-4 04 .a H O El W W a x 0' p>1 CO >4 >- >4 p 0 H p CO p Z Z Cl) CO CO g O Z Chi a' -• Z 3 ra H 0 d 4 H H x CO 00 -4 d G a. CO CO X a s U U a H H as oa A 0 tZ-1 x 3 H 0 0 Z 6Z6 CO - E - - - 3 x x H U 0 oC 0 0 X X X a' H El a 0 0 w W '� Z U 0 U .T W O o H Cn Cn O 0 4 0 0 0 o• x 0 0 a as as El El E-' El l HHE• Q` CO CO CO Cn Cn y Cn Cn CO CO Cl) CO Cn Cn Cl) C/) .--I N •3C ie * -3e it iC -DC ie ' •K •d El N N into 00 o in coca 000 00 In in c.-% 0-% co co .o .o 0 .00 Z .0 .o in In 0 0 co CO .o N C% 0 0 0 0 0 C. a. .T .T C) C) f` N to C. in O• 0 .O .D C) Cf N N N N eT .-1 0 N .T .-I N N C) Cf N N N N eb CO N C) .-i ~7 X .--1 .-I 0 0 N N V> V> 00 0 C. N 00 .o C• a. C) M .7 .T C) Cf co co .-I Il) r+ N N N N N V> V> H .--1 d N N .o .o .-I H V> Cl> N V> .-1 .-I V> r1 V> P V> V> C> V> V> V> V>V> V> V> V> ,>r X .0 N C1 .0 .G H 0 .--I i> N a> co. W V> N x Ci'. U W H CO CO .-1 .a .--I .--i .•1 .i .-i .•r .-I H .-I .-I .-I rI H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ Czi 0 .o .o .a .o .o .o .o .o .O .o .o .o .o .o .o .0 a' 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 X \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ X U v .7 - d .T .. .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 szr U CO Cr, C• C` C• O• O. C. 0% a. a. O• O• a• C. 0% Cs W x O• a% a. a. 0% a. C. a. eT O. O. a. O. C• a. C• O 0 .-I H .•-I .-I .-I .-I -1 .-r .-1 .-4 - .-I .-I .-4 .-1 .- 0 0 .-] Z CO as O .-I N C1 .T in .o n co H in in .o .O .o .o .o .o .o .o .o 0 X co co 00 00 00 o0 00 co co co ex Z 0 in in in in 1n 1n in in in .!. in O CO .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 d . .7 O x o 0 0 O 0 c o 0 0 o 0 0 U . 04 as a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 .44 H H H H H HHHHH H H H H H H H O z 0 00 g a N z 0 a W U H nn Cp 0% O0O00 .-1 N c•1 .7 N O •D .D .D .D n n N. n n N n n n on p a% rn a. a. .D a. 0% o% 0% 0% o. 0. 0% o. O .0 z o 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 o eh .D H 0 O O 0 .7 00000 0 0 0 0 .--I N 00 O O •a 00000 0 0 0 0 M H * N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n 0 N .-1 Cr) to ..-4 .-1 .-1 01 M .-1 CO CO u1 N n EN N c'1 u1 N N N N N N 01 C7 .7 .7 .-1 N z .7 .7 .7 .7 s -7 .t .7 .7 .Y - .7 �1 N I I I t I t I I I I I I I 1 I I O N .-1 r-1 .-1 N .-1 .-1 .-i rl .-i cn .-1 .-1 0 N .--1 U r♦ r I u1 N N 4' N N .-1 N .7 CO CO N .-1 C!1 O C7 Ch .--1 c7 - .7 .0 .7 c•1 .7 .-1 .7 .7 CO a% cn Q,' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U H N Z Z 0 H Z H H H H tn Q,' W 0 a s w a ra ra ra w w W >+ E H a E a aaEEa 0 0 t/) H Q,' Z E .06a to a aaZZa H H w E a H a H 'J O ".� n p H H 0 . 0 H • W I-3 ca to t� CA X X to W w H V) U W 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 t/3 V) E Z E t/1 D z t/) Z Z Z Z o 0 z U U H Z WCs. H \ W H H H Z Z H ,>4 r d w A E 14 Z E E E! H H E E E W W X Oda H g ga72 .-7Q ga H H H 0 H E-1 w W W W H H w H H 0.. O Z 0 oa. O• a aao0a E E W 0 d 0' Z 0 E w 0 00caca0 A 0 W >4 0 w 0 ZZZZZ HHHHH U 'J J 'J > H irl cei 4-44W W W W W w a twnvitwnCfV Z W '•• H WW < < Z < Q6 < d ca w O 0 0 0 W I-1 E EEE E 0 W W H r1 A H H W ZZZZZ 4 C 1 Z W W > g• W W W w w w z 00 H 0' w w w a W W W W W W 0 - 0 O > Z jH x E-4 0 0 0 0 0 H W W W Cg azWO O O O O Z W W I-1 0 W W O Z 0 E E E E E H E Z .-] d >+ .7 a s �l, Q' H HHHHH to cn W 0 r7 E a. AA Q Z W ZZZZZ a . w 6 P. 0. U E E E O D D D D D 3 3 .1 N is is . * ic is * * # 'k E .0 tn0In n n 00 a` 0. .70 .ot0000 00 u1 u1 0000 00 Ian 0 Z a. O c'1 07 .--1 .-1 0 0 0. 0' 00 -P. to N 4' .7 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 .a .0 to O• 0 n N N .1. .--1 .-1 .0 .D r1 .-1 to 0 .--1 00 cn 0. .0 .0 0 0 .0 .o op 00 c"1 cn c+1 •'1 ,1~ n N V}N N N .--1 .-1 N N n 411 c'1 to 0 r♦ 4- .7 n n N N c"1 C. .-1 .-I N Q,' .--1 V} V} V} CO. .-i .--1 CO. CO. VI. .--I V} CO. N to .-i .-i N N V} V> V}N to u1 V> O V} - - V} C/> CO- - - V} cA 4 W c`1 C•1 .D .D .--i .-i E U N N CO. CO- V} CA W N V} x W U W E CO w r•1 .-1 .--1 .-I .-I H .-4 .-1 .-1 .--1 .-4 -4 .-I .-i N N H E 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 \\ \ \ \ \\\\\ \ \ \ \ . \ W A .D .D .0 .D .D .D .0 .D .D .D .o .o •D .D .o .D W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W \\ \ \ \ \\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ O U . .- .7 .7 - .7 .7 -4. 7 .7 . .7 .7 v .7 .7 0 W , o• o% as as rn rn o. a% 0. 0' as as rn rn 0• rn w W i a• a% a. a` 0. 0. 0. 0. 0% a% a% a. a% 0. Cr‘ CT x C> i .-i .-1 .-1 r4 .--i .-1 .-I .-I .-I .-i .-1 .-1 .--1 .-I .-4 .--1 0 0 .a Z 1 a. 0 .-1 CS c-- .7 to .D n 00 N H . .0 n n n N n n n n N co 0 W 1 co Co 00 00 co 00 Co Co 00 ¢ 00 Z 0 , to to to to to to to to r s In O x . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 U U • .--144 1-4 H H 1-4 H H H H H .-1 E 1v0 0 0 W a I 0 a W C.) H to '.o N CO a1 o N N N N N Z 0 .-+ .-1 0 0 .-1 0 .-1 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 N 0 N 0 * .o .-1 to 0 0 en r1 co 0 N N N co CO CO CO N .-1 Z N 04 N .7 d 04 04 04 .7 I I I I I I I I I O 04 N N N P. N 04 04 04 o .a - .-4 04 04 e-1 r-1 .--1 0% Q o 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 a .a W CO CA 0 d Q H >+ 7+ D Z 44 44 Cw O a a al 0 0 Cl) 04 H H W C>!i CYi 6 o r7 00 H � N 0 Ci) i..1 d 0 H 0 x 04 H El 0 VD � .E-1 a 44 .H.1 .Ha co N 0 W H H H E E- s in O C) 0 x ki Cr.. o 0 N 0 04 a WW 0 a E 0 0 Cl) Z x 0 0 CA C/) E 0 Cl) U 44 .7 E 94 CLQ Cr.. Q p-7 Z cd 0 0 W 01 00 0 H W e-1 Z Z W W U .. 0 O Cil CII` HH 44 0 41 Z •-1 H 0 0 w' E U x .7 04 04 5 a. a W 0 0 10-1 a a z Cl)a cn Cl) P. N .0 4s * * * E 0 c`'f en .o .7 0 .n .n .n In N N N N .-4 .-1 0 0 a` Z in .-1 .-1 en in a. cn on a. a. .o .o .O .o .7 .7 0 0 C O• 0 M a• a. Cr, a. CO .-1 .-i .-4 .--1 N N in .n a` a+ 0 0 in ti N .-i .--1 -lop 0 00 N9 Cn -i .-1.-1 .-1 .-d c-I 01 0 O N CM 0% 0% 04 v1 CO 04 N CO- t/} CO Co N N CO CO N N 01 O V} N - • - N VY - • t/} t/} - - - - - .f: y.. H 0 H .--1 .-i In .n en cn M E C.) H .-4 N .-1 .-1 C/> N t/} N} .o W V} CO. t? OD. OD. N x CO• 04 0 W E V) W N N 04 N N N N N N H E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C., 44 \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ W 0 .o .a .o .o .o .o .o .0 .o \ \\ \ 0 0 \ 0 N4 \ a4 0 .7 - .7 .7 .7 d - Ni- NI- c...) 7o Wa• a, as a• a+ a+ a• a. a• W x I as a• as as as a, a% a\ a. x0 I .-., -: .-1 .-1 .-. .--1 .--1 .-1 .-1 CJ 0 -1 Z . cn 1 In .a N CO as O .-1 H i CO CO CO CO CO CO CO a` a. o a4 . Co CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO Z 0 I to to In .n in in .n to to O W . .7 .7 .7 Ni- d N.I. v .7 NI- 0 70 Z . 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 . 1 a1 00 as 114 VI In •• .7 ..o N O In In .7 r-1 C7 O. 0 O 0. O .- a. O O N N O %O •-O OA 1- a) M ,..r • •• Oo r-1 N in .--f to O n '0 f,- CO .-1 1/1 ON 0 '0 CO N CO 01 CO N s0 to col 'o N O 0 .--1 f� .a v--1 .-1 OA OA N 0 '.0 CT C Cr, S.0 '0 1� CO CO '-i c") cr) OT CO. V} .-1 O. H V} to V0 .7 .--1 II} N N O' N to OT r--1 N 0 44 C4 Z W Cs. X W C9 .0 o w z Hwa > z E+ w 1. a E 0 U w gH X 0 a W 0-. >• >a ..a E-4 E-4 4-4 0 a 0 X fx A t~i) ¢ ¢ ca H z H F 3 W HZ N a0 a0 H .7 H W a' a' as ¢ re o' ¢ E+ t/1 Cl) 0 E- x .--1 .-a .--1 C.) 0 .-1 f/) CO U. C.) .--1 .T In CO 0 .--1 .-1 in n O O O W 0 .--1 .-1 0 .-1 .--1 N N 01 .-1 C') = O .--1 .--1 r) en (•1 .7 .7 d n N a0 U .-a H It it it it it it it it it 3t # r U z ' O A 0 0 A A O 0 A 0 A 0 . z z z z z z z z z z z z o a a a o n o 0 0 U ; 1.. G=. Gr. w C'. c..., Cs. U. Cs. U. U. U. CONSENT K MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Sander Replacement DATE: June 2, 1994 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND: In 1993, the Public Works Department purchased a new sander for a new truck. This particular sander was different than the normal sanders in that it is able to also deposit sand along the side of the road in a wind row. This feature was felt to be advantageous so that the sander could be used in summer for gravel shouldering as well as winter sanding. After using this type of sander for one year, it is apparent that while the sander works well for shouldering, it is vastly inferior for winter sanding and has not performed well at all. The sander also obstructs the truck from normal use for hauling snow, etc. In reviewing the amount of shouldering work done annually, which is quite minimal, compared to winter sanding, staff feels that a good, solid winter sander is more essential. The department can do shouldering without the sander using the same methods we did prior to purchasing the sander. Staff has contacted the supplier and they are willing to take back the current sander and provide us with the normal winter sanders and reimburse the City$3,000.00, which is the price difference between the two sanders. Staff is requesting City Council concurrence to do this. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to authorize staff to replace the shouldering type sander from Crystal, Inc. with a conventional sander and to accept a $3,000.00 cash reimbursement for this transaction. DEH/pmp SANDER / .. MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator f§` FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: 1993 Street Reconstruction Project o�ect DATE: June 7, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Staff has completed the test results for the two blocks of Spencer Street and Fillmore Street that were paved temporarily last fall to determine if the paving can be left permanent. BACKGROUND: The Contractor has requested that the two blocks of Spencer Street and Fillmore Street be left permanent. On May 17, 1994 the City Council discussed this request and directed staff to complete the testing outlined in staff's April 22, 1994 letter to the Contractor to verify that this work met City specifications and plans. The testing has been completed and the test results are attached. Basically, three phases of testing were performed: vertical alignment, structural stability and material testing. As indicated in the report, the vertical alignment and structural stability of these streets look good. The only problem that was discovered was the material testing, specifically the compaction of the asphalt base. According to Mn/DOT and City specifications, the asphalt must meet 95% compaction. If the compaction is between 90% and 95%, the Engineer can allow it to remain, with a reduction in pay to the Contractor. Any compaction less than 90% is unacceptable and should be removed and replaced. Spencer Street achieved more than 90% on all tests (average 93.5), although some if it was less than 95%, so this street can be accepted with some pay adjustments. Fillmore Street, on the other hand, was less than 90% (average 89.5%) and therefore, the report recommended removal and replacement of the asphalt base. Compaction is important because without adequate compaction the material contains too may voids,which will allow moisture to penetrate and the frost/thaw action will expedite the pavement deterioration. In addition, without adequate base compaction, it will be difficult to achieve the 95% compaction on the wear course of asphalt. RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendations in the report, which are to allow Spencer Street to remain as permanent construction but to remove and replace the base course of asphalt on Fillmore Street. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to direct staff to notify S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. that Spencer Street, between 2nd and 3rd Avenue, can be considered permanent construction subject to the conditions and recommendations of the June 3, 1994 testing report, but that the base course of asphalt for Fillmore Street must be removed and replaced due to poor compaction results. DEH/pmp TESTS CISVIOrr Sc}yern 300 Park Place Center 612-595-5775 MEMORANDUM R Maeron& 5775 Wayzata Boulevard 1-800-753-5775 Associates,Inc. Minneapolis,MN 55416-1228 FAX 595-5774 TO: Mr. Dave Hutton, Public Works Director FROM: Bret A. Weiss, P.E. 'y, DATE: June 3, 1994 SUBJECT: Spencer Street/Fillmore Street Temporary Street Evaluation 1993 Street Reconstruction Program City of Shakopee Project No. 93-7 OSM Project No. 5081.01 This memo is in response to your letter to Mr. Steve Hentges dated April 22, 1994, with regard to the temporary paving of Spencer Street between 2nd Avenue and 3rd Avenue and Fillmore Street between 3rd Avenue and 4th Avenue. In your letter, you outlined a procedure for evaluating these streets to determine if the surface could become the permanent base course. The Shakopee City Council authorized the investigation work, which was consequently turned over to OSM for coordination of the investigation and preparation of the final report. This memo will address each item and procedure noted in your letter (see Appendix A), along with the results and recommendations. The testing analysis can be separated into three phases as follows: Vertical alignment, structural stability, and material testing. Analysis of these three procedures is as follows: • Vertical Alignment • Description: The first process in the investigation is the evaluation of the vertical alignment. If the vertical alignment is within the MN/Dot tolerance of 1/2 inch, the remainder of the testing could be completed. This evaluation is completed through the process of obtaining random cross-sections of the two streets in question and then comparing those elevations to the plan design grade. The cross-sections were completed and tabulated by OSM's Survey Department and are attached in Appendix B. • Analysis: The review of the cross-sections determined that, while there are slight variations in the pavement surface compared with the plan grade, these deviations do not exceed the specified Mn/DOT tolerance or provide any potential problems with completing the wear course paving to its design grade. Based on- the results of this phase, it was decided that the testing of the materials and subgrade should be ordered to complete the analysis. //\J H:\C V1L\NM\FNGINEER\BAW\0 .DH Engineers • Architects • Planners • Surveyors Mr. Dave Hutton City of Shakopee June 3, 1994 Page 2 • Structural Stability • Description: The structural stability of the street section is the primary reason that the street was not allowed to be paved in a permanent fashion in 1993. As you are aware, the City of Shakopee, as well as most communities in the State of Minnesota, requires a successful roll test be completed on the subgrade soils prior to placement of the aggregate base materials. The 1993 fall construction season did not produce weather adequate for drying of the subgrade materials in order to pass the roll test according to Mn/DOT specification. Therefore, the City could not recommend paving of the street in a permanent fashion without accepting full responsibility for the cost of any repair of the bituminous in 1994 due to potential unsuitable construction techniques. At that point, it was recommended that the streets remain with a gravel surface until the 1994 construction season when proper stability could be established. The contractor was informed that a temporary bituminous section should be constructed, which would be subject to removal in 1994 when the permanent section would be installed. As you are aware, the contractor decided to hire his own survey crew and place the material in a permanent fashion, even though the structural stability was not approved. As you stated in your recommendation letter, the subgrade stability and strength of the street could be evaluated through deflection testing analysis by using a road rater falling weight deflectometer utilized by Braun Intertec. This machine simulates a load on a pavement surface and measures the strength based on deflections of the street while under the load. This process utilizes proposed traffic volumes and the existing pavement section to provide an analysis of the existing subgrade strength and load-carrying capability. In addition,the test recommends the amount of bituminous overlay necessary for achieving the desired pavement load strength of 9 tons. (See Appendix C) • Analysis: The report of the structural stability contains a positive analysis of the two streets._ The proposed bituminous overlay of 1-1/2" and 2" for Fillmore Street and Spencer Street, respectively, will be adequate to achieve the 9-ton pavement strength. In some locations, the streets will have a strength well in excess of 9 tons. • Material Testing • Description: The final part of the analysis involves the evaluation of the materials used for the construction and the competence of the construction procedures. The tests completed include a gradation of the aggregate used in the bituminous mixture, an extraction of the percentage of oil used in the bituminous mixture, a density test of each core sample and the field-measured H:\CIVII.\NM\ENGINEER\BAW\060394.DH Mr. Dave Hutton City of Shakopee June 3, 1994 Page 3 depths of materials used for each street. (See Appendix D) The density tests computed a relative density of the field bituminous by comparing the actual density with a Marshall lab density value. This project, however, was completed under Mn/DOT Specification 2340, which involves contractor quality control and utilizes specific gravity testing for density analysis. The specific gravity testing is slightly different from the relative density tests and is,therefore,being completed this week. A recommendation may be available prior to the council meeting, however, the specific gravity tests are usually more restrictive than the relative density tests. • Analysis: The analysis of the testing is as follows: • Bituminous Extraction: Within prescribed limits. • Aggregate Gradation: With prescribed limits. • Material Thickness: o Aggregate - In all cases, the measured aggregate base far exceeds the design requirements. o Bituminous - Spencer Street - All cores exceeded the prescribed limits. Fillmore Street - All cores except one met the prescribed limits. The one core was within Mn/DOT tolerance and is, therefore, satisfactory. • Density Analysis: The density analysis utilized the Marshall compaction test to determine the relative density percentage between the field value and a lab compaction of the same material. The minimum density allowed without a deduct is 95%. o Spencer Street- All tests were greater than 91%, with two tests greater than 95%. This street will be re-evaluated using the specific gravity test to determine a possible reduction in the payment of the bituminous material. o . Fillmore Street - All of the tests were below 93%, with an average of 89.5%. Mn/DOT specification recommends removal for any tests less than 90%. This street will be re-evaluated according to the specific density relationship. H:\CML\NM\ENGINE1R\SAW\060394.DH Mr. Dave Hutton City of Shakopee June 3, 1994 Page 4 • Recommendation: • Spencer Street - This street section is adequate to remain as the permanent base course of bituminous. The edges should be milled to a distance of three feet from the face of the proposed concrete curb and gutter. This three-foot section should be filled with the bituminous base course and adequately compacted prior to the wear course placement. In addition, the base course materials will be considered for a reduction in payment after verification of the specific gravity testing is completed. • Fillmore Street - This street section is under consideration for complete bituminous removal and replacement subject to the specific gravity testing. If the testing proves to be better than anticipated, a possibility exists that the base course could receive a payment reduction instead of the removal. If the street is allowed to remain, the three-foot section between the curb face and the existing section must also be completed as with Spencer Street. nm H:\CIVIL\NM\ENGINEER\BAW\06039/.DH / )' 7 1 A BI-DFF V 11°U illill DR . 1- LEVEECC - v, d� glom AV E.00000, 00•••10,K LA IOC A 2= � qV 1st qVE � � •� 2 riga 11 , W 11160g �� AVE NM CD 02WWWWWW. Zik 3rd AVE M ®\________AI" IlliCill rl AVE. N AVE 0111 SO0 1____1acolliAVE .00 6th AVE 3.11101116th AV E 111111 0011111 'Cv__-\li 0 7th L Q isralitli visC3 AVE 8th o [ AVE z z • iIflhimfli KO " EE _ Q 3 cc C.p L.- o )\ -<---a Li Q Q AVE \\ 711kE. / l Z 44 t-uc 79 Y (E.; " McDEV/ TT sr E . lit ! 4 THOMAS 1 AVE . Drawn By: Drawing Title Comm. No. Date (St' Orr 5081.01 Schelen 1993 STREET Mayeron & Associates, Inc. RECONSTRUCTION sheet no. Engineers • Architects • Planners • Surveyors 5-19-94 300 Park Place Center• 5775 Veysata Boulevard Minneapolis.MN 55416.1228• 612-595-57'75 APPENDIX A SI-IA.KOPEE • April 22. 1994 :. o ; AP[ 23 132:: Steve Hentges S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. P.O. Box 520 Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: 1993 Street Reconstruction Project No. 1993-7 Dear Steve: I am in receipt of your April 5, 1994 letter requesting that the construction done last fall on Spencer Street and Fillmore Street be considered as permanent construction. As you are aware, last fall you submitted a request to the City to leave these two blocks Gravel over the winter. Our contract with you required that all streets started be paved prior to winter. This request to leave the streets gravel was submitted to the City Council for consideration on November 16, 1993. City staff supported your request and recommended approval of it to the .) City Council. The City Council did not agree with staff's recommendation and ordered temporary pavement placed on these two blocks to get through the winter or be faced with liquidated damages for not completing the pavement by the contractual deadlines. Upon being informed of this decision, you elected to pave the streets. Based on the City Council action, the Engineering Department considered this work temporary. You are now requesting that this work be considered permanent and indicated that the streets were constructed to City specifications. Unfortunately, City staff did not verify that these streets were constructed to City specifications because the work was considered temporary. There was no City inspection to confirm that the construction met our specifications. Typically, the subgrade prior to the gravel base being placed and likewise the gravel base must be roll tested and meet grade before paving. This ensures that proper compaction is achieved and that a uniform thickness of gravel is placed. In addition, the paving is normally inspected for thickness, compaction, etc. to meet City specifications. None of this was done on these two blocks. Finally, the City surveyors did not set grades on these streets for this work, but rather you hired your own surveyor. Therefore, in order to grant your request, the Engineering Department must now somehow do an "after-the-fact" inspection to-verify that the construction meets our requirements. It is also my position that since this work was ordered by the City Council, any request to leave it permanent must also be approved by the Council. .. • CON MUNny PRIDE SINCE 1857 129 Holmes Street South• Shakopee,Minnesota• 55379.1331 • 612445.35S1 • FAX 612.4;*-6118 In order to even consider your request, certain items must be done in order to verify that the work meets City specifications. If the following items are completed, verified and found acceptable by the Engineering staff, I could support your request to the City Council: 1. The streets must be surveyed in order to verify that they meet plan grades and cross section. 2. Core samples will be required to verify the gravel and asphalt thickness to verify it meets the section designed and to ensure that there is a uniform cross section throughout. I would require a minimum of 4 core samples per block. 3. A road rater should be used to verify the structural capacity of the street section. I would require 6 tests per block in 50 foot intervals. I have contacted Braun and have received an estimate to do this work for approximately S875.00. 4. The asphalt core samples will be sent to our testing lab to verify gradation, density and asphalt content. 5. All areas of pavement distress evident must be repaired. 6. A minimum patch of 3 feet wide along the curb and gutter for the base asphalt will be required prior to placing the wear course. I would propose that you pay for all testing costs to verify the specifications for the City to consider your request. If all of the above conditions are agreeable to you and confirm that the work meets City specifications, I would support your request to the City Council to consider this work permanent. The first step is to check the grades and cross section. The reason for a delay in responding to your request is because we have ordered these two streets surveyed and the survey has been completed (attached are copies of the field notes). As indicated by the survey, the streets do not meet plan grades. Some areas are up to 2 1/2" Iow, with other areas 3" high. Based on this it does not appear that the streets will have a uniform base section or meet plan grades by taking any corrective action such as adding more base or milling high spots. Therefore, I do not feel that I can take this request to City Council at this time. In order to correct the grade problems, I am requesting that you remove the asphalt base and regrade the Class V to correct grade tolerances. Prior to regrading the tolerances I would like to verify that the Class V has not been contaminated due to the subgrade not passing the roll test last fall. To do this I would agree to pulling back about 4" - 6" of the existing gravel, windrow it on the side of the road, check the gravel underneath and if there is no contamination, the gravel can be immediately placed back on the streets, regraded, compacted, and roll tested. Once that Lew has been done and accepted, you can proceed with the rest of the street construction. None of this work will result in a change order to the contract. I will be more than willing to discuss this situation further, but based on the asphalt grades I do not feel there are any other alternatives. If the proposed work as outlined above is acceptable to you, there is no need to obtain City Council concurrence on the decision. If you disagree with my decision and desire City Council action on your request, please contact me and I will put your request on the first available Council meeting. Sincerely, 6-- David E. Hutton, P.E. Public Works Director DEHJpmp RECONSTRUCT cc: Dennis Kraft, City Admin. Karen Marty, City Attorney City Council • • • APPENDIX B :. � : it `i(aN T 4 r.-•jAr' :. L FT 7 o F r `c , Of . iNfiLAcE Bf} sE Co Le SE. • ti - . ._ -9 -ii a _ _ _ `BJ #i _.r_-.._.__.._...r..._._7-.. __... - -- --- _ _ i • 37foo in :d % v :.. : ti. D':a. I �c.J' p o 9 ..L�O-cs V .::.I-.3 5-, .. ii.. •: 0 i 0 /. ip....z..4_.; './ : . ' - 0 0-f •J L<_, .)- --- -.5-6. i V 0 i 0 -it..z.•:."_/. _..._ _ ---: u ' 3 9 ._ _„,c___, _ _. . . . • t 0 111'-0 O z✓14...4-‘.i . Q d J-,ci--60- _ 39: ;t•40 to 0 , D SJ {r( r '•s }� :_..___,_.... L1Ii F �• ' :,:;=.:.,:::;:_:41-_.,-.7....- .. x {{fir .:2� - - he tyx‘. P. - _ Y•Fra- .. _ .' 1° £ + _ -- Y l' • '..32;.-:•T / ( F7" TOE IP? i/ .r.:•:5:::• --: Tc7E s. �4. i • '/,NA L /4 c 6 . - 3 i4 5 E" C v c.r .N S I>, moo.= i D ;o 7 , . �,,t,t.) - • p. ,.•e) 7.-i 04 0/... .2 "- Do. i, . . — •i is 11 __________ __�___ • so: ;,, off___ o ; a � .3 1 Pi •! - _ • • 3 a 6' , ..0 //_ .,ABY. _ '� • . . U.,:O.S /�C -,,' `� O'..; 0 i.....,':.. 1 � . •4--.... f ': ` o ciD 1 1 G . -.-( '- O , 07 �tQ W o . 3 . .o_ • ii:. d r ✓1 i r . f i ----.— ` tF" �t . l . '� ir y tixp I%II' , et = - k. • :.i4 ,: :,.-i. 4;,4,-,...-,-,:,:,,--,-,..-- . � r :Y SGS.�R.t' �'. .... i�i. - - :-.... ..-;4'.'.s` r'-': i'•'--'...--•, ' '4'" APPENDIX C BRAUN' I NTE RTEC Report for City of Shakopee Deflection Testing Analysis Report Number DBNX 94-785 May 1994 Engineers and Scientists Serving the Built and Ncruro!Environments Braun Intertec Corporation B R A U N SM Braun Intertec Corporation 1983 Sloan Place NTE RT E C St.Paul,Minnesota 55117.2004 612-776-7522 fax:776-7201 Engineers and Scientists Serving the Built and Natural Environments May 27, 1993 Mr. Bret A. Weiss P.E. Orr Schelen Mayeron & Associates, Inc. 300 Park Place Center 5775 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55416 - 5774 Dear Mr. Weiss: Enclosed please find a copy of our report for deflection testing analysis for the city of Shakopee. We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you and to Shakopee. Should there be any questions regarding the contents of the report or any of our other services, please call. Sincerely, )elj- AhL- Guy W. Kohlnhofer Project Engineer I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Erland O. Lukanen, P.E. Registration Number: 11932 1 Date: tea/ ,77, /997 Introduction The firm of OSM contacted Braun Intertec Corporation to conduct deflection testing on 2 blocks of city streets in the city of Shakopee. One block is on Spencer Street between 2nd and 3rd Avenues -- and the other is on Fillmore Street between 3rd and 4th Avenues. The sections were reconstructed in 1993, however due to weather conditions the street was constructed over a wet subgrade and paved with a 2 inch layer of bituminous. This created a degree of uncertainty regarding it's structural integrity and removal of the existing bituminous may be necessary prior to final paving of the surface. This report contains the soil strength, strength inventory, and overlay recommendations as requested for the those streets. The testing was conducted on May 23, 1994 in the outer wheelpath of the lane indicated by the termini. The deflection testing was conducted using a Model 8000E Falling Weight Deflectometer. Tests were taken at 100 foot intervals in both directions resulting in a 50 foot staggered pattern The pavement composition data, traffic and present allowable axle load information were provided by the personnel of OSM. The deflection data may be found in the latter part of this report. The analysis and reported values are generally based on the 85th percentile which is the value at which 85 percent of the test locations meet or exceed the recommended value. Discussion Fillmore Street - This street appears to be in good structural condition with an effective R-Value of 27 and an Effective Granular Equivalent (EGE) of 11. The structural capacity of the section appears to be consistent with the exception of an area 100 feet north of 4th Avenue. This area exhibits a lower EGE. Spencer Street - Analysis of deflection data indicates an Effective R-Value of 20 and an EGE of 13. This is what would be expected of the reported inpiace materials. Final paving of these roads is reported to consist of 2 inches of wear course bituminous. Considering the results of the deflection testing, removal of the bituminous and reworking the base is not structurally necessary. The planned 2 inches of wear course should be sufficient to complete the structure and carry the expected loads. 1 1 Equipment Used A Dynatest Model 8000E Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) was used for the nondestructive testing (NDT). The FWD is a trailer mounted, electro-hydraulically activated device that imposes a dynamic 1 -- impulse load onto the pavement surface. The magnitude of the load can be adjusted by changing the weight package or drop height. An 11.8 inch diameter load plate was used to transmit the load to the pavement. deflections were measured bydeflection sensors located at specific radial distances from the center TheP 1 of the load plate as follows: Sensor D 1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 1 Offset(in.) 0 8 12 18 24 36 60 IA diagram of a typical deflection basin and the deflection measurement locations is shown in Figure 1. I 1 P-, , i 1 ii--i . Falling - Drop height and weight are variable . : / Weight 1 I J I ( 1 Velocity Transducers (Sensors) l Load PlateI 1 I \ . I_J � 1 i i + D7 D5 AAAAAA•Surface AtflA D2 • ••.0 tkfv:.�.ite; ��• .,#i• Base ,{wtfA Dt I 7 .i-.t.:..,_":-:`;: r:.7.4:: .:;�:• f :'ii .♦ rV i S Subgrade S l . Figure 1. Typical Deflection Basin as measured by the Falling Weight Deflectometer • Deflection Testing Using the Falling Weight Deflectometer The Model 8000E Dynatest Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) is a trailer mounted device which uses the impact force generated by a falling mass. The FWD is capable of applying a variety of loads ranging from 2000 to 27,000 pounds to the pavement. :E The FWD generates the load force by dropping a mass onto a set of rubber buffers. The force generated is proportional to the amount of mass and height of drop. This applied force is measured electronically by a load cell attached to the load plate. The impulse load generated is varied to suit the pavement and analysis procedure. During the loading, the pavement deflections are measured at seven locations on the pavement by seismic geophones. One geophone is located at the center of the load area, and the other six geophones are manually set at various distances from the load plate. The seven geophones measure the deflections simultaneously resulting in a measurement of the shape of the deflection basin. With the use of elastic layer analysis the strength of the individual layers of a pavement can be determined from the deflection basin shape characteristics. The weaker a pavement structure is with respect to the subgrade, the steeper the deflection basin will be. The deflection values inversely represent the strength of the specified area tested. This testing method is sensitive to the pavement temperature and to the time of year. However, factors have been developed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation to adjust the deflections to represent a springtime deflection of a pavement with a mat temperature of 80F. The testing is performed at a selected spacing to form a statistical sample of the pavement strength. Variation in pavement strength does occur between test points. Traffic volume, pavement thickness and subgrade soil type information is also required to determine the strength characteristics for the pavement segment. If at any time they are found to be different, the strength characteristics should be re- calculated. The deflection tests provide extremelyvaluable information for determining pavement load capacity, setting spring axle load limits and for design purposes. The magnitude of the deflections will remain relatively constant, allowing for seasonal and temperature changes, throughout the life of a pavement and will begin increasing only when pavement distress develops. There are indications, however, that the shape of the deflection basin will change within the normal life of a pavement. Pavement condition during its normal life should be rated by its roughness or rideability and the surface condition. The surface condition of the pavement in the vicinity of each test point is recorded at the time of the test, but the roughness must be measured separately. 1 Basis of Analysis The analysis was based on the results of the deflection tests and also on information furnished by the client as follows: r> average annual daily traffic • year of traffic count r> thickness of asphalt and base materials • type of subgrade soil 1 The Braun Intertec program NDT was used for the analysis of the deflection data. NDT incorporates the structural relationships that were developed by Mn/DOT Office of Research and Development and the 1 thickness design relationships for flexible pavements from the "Guide for Design of Pavement Structures", published by AASHTO in 1986. The design equation used is for an 85 percent confidence level based on the average AASHTO recommended factors. Deflection tests are at intervals of approximately 0.1 mile on rural sections and 100 feet in urban sections. CSAH 14 was tested at .2 mile intervals in both directions, resulting in a .1 mile staggered pattern. The analysis and recommendations have been made over sections of roadway with logical termini. Determining these recommendations makes use of a statistical procedure to prevent the adoption of overly conservative values. This procedure raises the possibility that the recommendations may not reflect the condition or strength at some points. Therefore, the condition of all the roadway surfaces should be monitored periodically to observe whether occasional spots of distress occur. Additionally, the allowable spring axle load given for each section is the load that section can be expected to safely carry during average spring seasons. A roadway may not effectively withstand the stated load capacity if there is an exceptionally wet spring or a spring with excessive freeze thaw cycles. The traffic volumes provided by the client were transformed into daily equivalent 18,000 pound single axle loadings (ESALs) for the analysis. This conversion was based on statewide averages for vehicle distribution and weights as shown in Chapter 7, Pavement Design, of the Road Design Manual, Part II. The vehicle distributions were adjusted for the percentage of trucks furnished by the client. It is unlikely actual traffic would fall below 3 ESALs; therefore, a minimum of 3 ESALs is used for analysis. A tabulation is included showing the typical vehicle distributions and truck factors and may be found following the "Data Tabulations and Plots" section. The ESALs may vary considerably on low volume roads, and if it is found that the ESALs are not representative of the section, the analysis should be done over with the current traffic data. Data Tabulations and Plots The data tabulations sheets contain a heading section at the top of the page and a tabulation section listing the data and analysis results. The heading section contains information relevant to the section tested. --The name of the section tested and information regarding its location is in the upper right of each page. The left part of the heading contains the date tested, the estimated Daily Equivalent 18,000 pound single axle loadings (ESALs) that are applied to the pavement, temperature of the asphalt mat at approximately one inch below the surface at the time of test, thickness of all the bound asphalt layers, a Surface Condition Rating Number, a Seasonal Correction Factor, and a line for comments relevant to the section or the analysis. The Surface Condition Rating Number is discussed in detail on the Basis of Field Observations sheet. The Seasonal Correction Factor is used to calculate the deflection that is expected to occur during the spring thaw period. The tabulations contain eleven or twelve numeric columns for the Falling Weight Deflectometer or Road Rater respectively, and one comment column. These are described as follows: Test Locations: A reference used to locate the position of the test point, usually in distance from the beginning of the section. A left and right column is included to show in which lane the test was taken, if tests were taken in both directions. Force: The amount of dynamic load applied to the pavement. It is listed in kips for the Road Rater (one kip equals 1000 pounds), or pounds for the Falling Weight Deflectometer. FREQ: (Road Rater only) The number of load pulses applied each second. DEFL #1..#4: These four columns contain the measured deflection at each test point in mils. One mil is equal to 0.001 inch. Effective Granular Equivalent (EGE): This is the granular equivalent thickness that is needed to match the overall pavement deflection. Effective Subgrade R-Value: The effective strength of the subgrade soil as calculated from the resilient modulus, which is based on the deflections. It is expressed as an Effective R- value based on the back calculated resilient modulus of the subgrade soil. • Required Overlay: This column contains the overlay required to increase the structural capacity of the pavement to carry the number of ESALs expected in 20 years. The thickness design from the "Guide for Design of Pavement Structures", published by AASHTO in 1986, is used to calculate the structural requirement of the section. The design is based on an 85 percent confidence level using the factors recommended in the Guide. Also, for sections with a Surface Condition Rating Number of less than 3.0, additional overlay is based on the following formula: 1 Additional Overlay (inches) = 3.0-SCR Axle Load Restriction: This column contains the recommended axle load restriction that would result in a spring deflection equal to the deflection that would result from the design lsection. The design section is determined from the design procedure described in the "Guide for Design of Pavement Structures". Comments: This column contains the equipment operator's comments regarding the pavement in the vicinity of each test point or location information. The location, deflection data, and comments are always listed in the printouts. In addition, the EGE, Effective R-value, overlay thickness and tonnage are listed as requested by the client. Plots are also included following the data tabulations. The plots are proportionally scaled for both the 1 horizontal and vertical axis. This makes it possible to easily visualize where changes occur throughout the section. A plot is made for one or more of the following depending on what is requested by the client: Effective Granular Equivalent, Effective Subgrade R-value, 9-ton Overlay Thickness, and Allowable Axle Load. 1 - I { 1 --Sample-- Distribution Factors by Vehicle Type and Projected 1993 Equivalent Single Axle Load Calculations • for Shakopee, Minnesota Roadway: Spencer Street From: 3rd Avenue • To: 2nd Avenue Year of Latest AADT Count 1994 Latest AADT Count 2,700 1994 Projected AADT 2,700 Percent HCADT 7.5 Traffic Projection Factor 1.99 Percent Design Number of Vehicle of Lane Vehicles ESAL DAILY DESIGN Type AADT AADT Per Lane Factors LANE ESAL 1 74.4% x 1350 = 1005 x 0.0004 = 0.4 2 15.7% x 1350 = 212 x 0.0070 = 1.5 3 2.4% x 1350 = 32 x 0.0100 = 0.3 4 3.3% x 1350 = 45 x 0.2500 = 11.2 5 2.2% x 1350 = 29 x 0.5800 = 16.9 6 0.0% x 1350 = 0 x 0.3900 = 0.0 7 0.1% x 1350 = 2 x 0.5100 = 0.9 8 0.6% x 1350 = 9 x 1.1300 = 9.7 9 0.0% x 1350 = 0 x = 0.0 10 1.3% x 1350 = 17 x 0.5700 = 9.8 Totals: 100% 1350 Avg.Daily ESAL 51.0 The Percent AADT is Based on the Vehicle Distribution for the Type of Roadway Listed in the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual. This Distribution is Adjusted to Reflect the Assumed Percent of HCADT(Vehicle Types 4-10). The ESAL Factors Listed were Obtained from the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual for the Roadway Type. • FWDData Design Analysis Braun Intertec Corporation - Commission Number 94-785 Date of Test: 5/23/94 Client: Shakopee, City of Daily ESAL5: 15.0 Roadway: Fillmore Street Temperature Range: 72 - 70 Asphalt Thickness: 2.00 From: 4th Avenue Surface Condition Rating: 4.9 To: 3rd Avenue Seasonal Correction Factor: 1.32 Comment: Test Effective 9-Ton Maximum Location --Sensor Readings (mils)-- Granular Effective Overlay Allowable (feet ) Force Deft Defl Deft Deft Equivalency Subgrade Thickness Axle Load Left I Right (lbs.) 0" 12" 24" 36" (inches) R-Value (inches) (ton/axle) Comments 0 - -- ---- -- - ---- ---- --- - --- --- C/L 4TH AV 50 9336 23.13 10.52 5.32 3.77 15.0 29 0.0 9.6 100 9432 23.59 7.53 3.37 2.21 9.1 42 0.8 8.2 150 9544 18.94 7.10 3.24 2.30 11.6 48 0.0 9.2 200 9512 20.57 7.87 3.37 2.34 12.2 41 0.0 9.2 250 9464 25.26 10.86 5.45 3.42 14.2 27 0.0 9.2 300 9560 18.68 7.14 3.50 2.51 11.7 49 0.0 9.2 350 9408 25.60 14.54 6.91 4.16 19.5 19 0.0 10.0+ 370 ---- - -- - - - - --- --- - --- --- C/L 3RD AV" Braun intertec Corporation - Commission Number 94-785 Date of Test: 5/23/94 Client: Shakopee, City of Daily ESALs: 15.0 Roadway: Fillmore Street Temperature Range: 72 - 70 Asphalt Thickness: 2.00 From: 4th Avenue Surface Condition Rating: 4.9 To: 3rd Avenue Seasonal Correction Factor: 1.32 Comment: Effective Granular Equivalency (inches) 50 50 45 - - 45 40 - - 40 35 - 35 30 - - 30 25 - - 25 1 20 - ` 20 15 - 15 - 10 10 5 5 0 - 0 0 100 200 300 (feet) Effective Subgrade R-Value 50 50 45 - 45 40 - - 40 35 - - 35 30 - - 30 25 - - 25 • 20 - - 20 15 - - 15 10 - - 10 5 - 5 0 0 0 100 200 300 (feet) Braun Intertec Corporation - Commission Number 94-785 Date of Test: 5/23/94 Client: Shakopee, City of Daily ESALs: 15.0 Roadway: Fillmore Street Temperature Range: 72 - 70 Asphalt Thickness: 2.00 From: 4th Avenue Surface Condition Rating: 4.9 To: 3rd Avenue Seasonal Correction Factor: 1.32 (continued) Comment: 9-Ton Overlay Thickness Recommendation (inches) 10 10 9 - • 9 8 - 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 - 4 3 - 3 2 - 2 1 1 0 0 200 300 0 100 (feet) Maximum Allowable Axle Load (tons/axle) 20 20 18 _ 18 - - 16 16 14 14 12 12 - - 10 10 - 8 8 - 6 b - 4 4 2 2 - 0 0 0 100 200 300 (feet) Braun Intertec Corporation - Commission Number 94-785 ? Date of Test: 5/23/94 Client: Shakopee, City of I Daily ESALs: 51.0 Roadway: Spencer Street Temperature Range: 70 - 70 Asphalt Thickness: 2.00 From: 3rd Avenue Surface Condition Rating: 4.9 To: 2nd Avenue Seasonal Correction Factor: 1.32 __ Comment: Test Effective 9-Ton Maximum Location --Sensor Readings (mils)-- Granular Effective Overlay Allowable 1 (feet ) Force Deft Defl Defl Deft Equivalency Subgrade Thickness Axle Load ( Left I Right (lbs.) 0" 12" 24" 36" (inches) R-Value (inches) (ton/axle) Comments 0 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- - --- --- C/L 3RD AV l 50 9200 29.45 14.20 7.05 4.81 15.4 19 1.0 8.0 100 9528 20.53 9.19 4.61 3.25 14.7 35 0.2 8.8 150 9440 22.62 10.69 5.05 3.34 15.9 28 0.2 8.8 200 9512 21.91 10.95 5.72 3.73 17.3 27 0.0 9.2 I 250 9328 26.27 13.81 6.69 4.38 17.7 20 0.2 8.8 300 9208 27.90 11.80 4.83 3.16 13.3 24 1.3 7.8 350 9152 23.38 9.71 3.86 2.56 13.5 30 0.8 8.2 370 --- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- - --- --- C/L 2ND AV I I 1 1 Braun Intertec Corporation - Commission Number 94-785 Date of Test 5/23/94 Client: Shakopee, City of Daily ESALs: 51.0 Roadway: Spencer Street Temperature Range: 70 - 70 Asphalt Thickness: 2.00 From: 3rd Avenue Surface Condition Rating: 4.9 To: 2nd Avenue Seasonal Correction Factor: 1.32 Comment: Effective Granular Equivalency (inches) 50 50 45 - - 45 - 40 - 40 35 - 35- 30 30 ' 25 - 25 20 - 20 15 - 15 10 - 10 5 - 5 0 0 0 100 200 330 (feet) Effective Subgrade R-Value 50 50 - 45 45 - 40 40 35 35 30 30 - 25 25 - 20 20 15 15 - 10 10 - 5 5 00 0 100 200 300 (feet) Braun Intertec Corporation - Commission Number 94-785 1 Date of Test: 5/23/94 Client: Shakopee, City of Daily ESALs: 51.0 Roadway: Spencer Street Temperature Range: 70 - 70 Asphalt Thickness: 2.00 From: 3rd Avenue Surface Condition Rating: 4.9 To: 2nd Avenue Seasonal Correction Factor: 1.32 (continued) Comment: 9-Ton Overlay Thickness Recommendation (inches) 10 10 9 - ' 9 l 8 - - 8 7 - . 7 I 6 - - 6 5 - • 5 1 4 - 4 3 - •. 3 2 - • 2 1 1 - 1 0 , 1 I I 0 0 100 200 300 (feet) Maximum Allowable Axle Load (tons/axle) 20 20 18 • 18 16 - • 16 14 - • 14 12 - • 12 i - 10 10 - . 8 8 - 6 - • 6 • 4 4 - • 2 2 - 0 0 0 100 200 300 (feet) APPENDIX D 71 T INSTANT TESTING COMPANY ~ 4000 BEAU D'RUE DRIVE TEST REPORT = CO EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 .�--- Phone 454-3544 Bituminous Core& Density Project: Temporary Street Construction1993.3 Mr. Ray Ruuska City of Shakopee Engineering Department 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Date Tested: May 24 1994 Reported: June 1, 1994 Ordered By: Bret Weiss, P.E. OSM Field Technician: Larry Petersen, ITCO Test Results on Inplace Bituminous; 6" Diameter Bituminous Cores _ T Core/Lab, No, Location Thickness, Marshall Density, Field Relative • Inches PCF Density, PCF Density, % • 1A/94177 W. side of. Filmore 1.35 Bituminous Core 1D 129.3 87 25' So. of 3d St. .23"Class 5 148.8 1B/94178 50' So. of 3d 1.76 Bituminous 133.9 90 W. of center ,p.j" Class 5 1C/9,1179 75' No. or 4th St. 2,77 Bituminous " 138.6 93 E. of center ;o"Class 5 • 1 D/941 RO 40' No. of 4th St. 1.85 Bituminous " 130.9 88 • E. side /"'Class 5 • . Remarks: �' ��ss ;,►j I Copies To: City of Shakopee, OSM SiT"- 8%.2`Copies � /o a f Charge Codes: 6" Diam. Bit, Cores . . . #402 4 mileage 46 y 99•y Marshall Compaction #404 , , 1 CAS f Bit. Density tests #401 , , 4 j� 96 Z measurements no charge 1 yt ---.. q0.7 ,� ,.44t Pim s.t hi0 78,6 �1 is r i rj.rS /0 6a op ctRss 1443-14.0 `K2.3 . Yo — 27• Y z.o o . .�.- 6 P 7 Signed -- G.J. Kopacek Professional Engineer-Registration No.7254 TWENTY-FIFTH ANNIVERSARY 1968-1993 na n7 CA n1: 17 PM Pr!7 V -1;. 1.:.6 irk.., IT INSTANT TESTING COMPANY 4000 BEAU D'RUE DRIVE TEST REPORT CO EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 Phone 454-3544 Bituminous Core & Density Project: Temporary Street Construction1993-3 Mr. Ray Ruuska City of Shakopee Engineering Department 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Date Tested: May 24 1994 Reported: June 1, 1994 t` Ordered By: Bret Weiss, F.E. OSM Field Technician: Larry Petersen, ITCO • Test Results on Inplace Bituminous; 6" Diameter Bituminous Cores Thickness, Marshall Density, Field Relative Ca�rc/Lab. No. LocationThickness, PCF Density, PCF Density, % 2A194181 W, side Spencer St. 2.R9 Bituminous Cara 2A 135.6 92 • 0 • 30' So. of 2d St. 12" Class 5 2B/94182 W. of center, 2.34 Bituminous 141.0 96 So. of 2d St. 14" Class 5 -- .__ 2C/94183 75' i?. of tenter 2.18 Bituminous „.. 139.3 95 No. of 3d St. 12" Class 5 „ 134.11 91 2D1941$4 44'Nolo 3dfroE. side 2.29 gBituminous 2 /9;') ..5--6 Remarks: s,x,,,c- .c z-e.. Copies To: City of Shakopee, OSM 34/ 1 C Charge Codes: 6" Diam. Bit. Cores . . . #406 . . 4 57'e r. mileage #612 0090,V/4 Marshall Compaction . #404 . . 1 9�, Bit. Density tests #401 . . 4 g .--- measurements no charge 7 7'G r V. L ll 5/der4d-tA A 4.4 '3" „yt,Jwl ✓Si a lam+"' i,7 -q r► di 01_60,S C IA``!�' .. 9.0 _ --- ata'V go .r__.__ /v.3 e.,..9 v 0. 7 Signed --~ G.J. Kopacek Professional Engineer• Registration No.7254 TWENTY-FIFTH ANNIVERSARY 1968-1993 # J3tY\ MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Recommended Salary Adjustment DATE: June 3 , 1994 INTRODUCTION: Several adjustments were made in the course of adopting the 1994 Pay Plan in order to bring it into compliance with the State' s Pay Equity (Comparable Worth) Law. BACKGROUND: The 1994 Pay Plan includes more salary steps then did the 1993 Pay Plan. Generally employees start at one of the lower steps in the pay plan and then progressively move up on an annual basis to the next higher step on the pay plan. The specific concerns here relate to the positions of City Engineer, Police Chief, and City Attorney. A couple of years ago, after a comp worth study, it was determined that the positions of Police Chief and City Engineer were being compensated at a higher level than the comparable worth points indicated they should have been compensated. The City Council then froze the top step of those two positions while other positions were adjusted. In preparing the 1994 Pay Plan new points were assigned and it was determined that both the City Engineer and Police Chief should receive a greater number of points. The top steps of the pay plan now reflect this . The major point of inequity relates to both the points that the three positions have, the steps on the pay plan, and the salaries that each individual is being paid. The City Attorney position has 114 points, the City Attorney as of the beginning of the year had almost 3 1/2 years experience, was on step 7 of the City Attorney position and had an annual salary of $57, 828 . 00 . The Police Chief position was increased to 119 points, the incumbent in the position had 4 years of experience with the City, was on step 4 of the pay plan, and had an annual salary of $55, 721 . 00 . The City Engineer position had a point value of 122, the individual has been with the City for 6 years, was on step 4 of the pay plan and an annual salary of $57, 125 . 00 . The following table depicts the current salary, point, pay step and salary data: Years Present Position # points Experience Step Salary_ City Attorney 114 3+ 7 $57, 828 Police Chief 119 4 4 $55, 721 P.W. Director 122 6 4 $57, 828 It is my opinion that if the City wants to maintain an equitable relationship with these three positions, the greater the point value and the greater the number of years of experience the higher the salary should be . This relationship currently does not exist . At this time, the individual with the fewest number of points and the least amount of experience is making the greatest amount of money. It is desirable that two salary levels be adjusted in order to bring the number of points and experience in line with the levels of compensation. While there might be other exempt positions that do not have a direct correlation between the number of years of experience and the position on the pay plan, I am aware of no other instance where there is an inequity between the number of points, the number of years of experience, the salary being paid and a situation where the positions were frozen earlier because of comparable worth. RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that the City Engineer position be increased to step 6 of the pay plan with an annual salary of $ 60, 299 and that the Police Chief be increased to step 6 of the pay plan with an annual salary of $ 58, 816 . This will result in a direct correlation of years of experience, comparable worth points and levels of compensation. ACTION REQUESTED: Set the levels of compensation for the City Engineer and Police Chief at step 6 of their respective positions in the 1994 Pay Plan effective January 1, 1994 . /Vc MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer 7rt" SUBJECT: Viking Steel Road Feasibility Report DATE: May 31, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 4007, a resolution receiving a report and calling for a public hearing for improvements to Viking Steel Road from County Road 16 to Trunk Highway 101 and an unnamed street west of Viking Steel from County Road 16 to 4th Avenue. The hearing will be set for the June 21, 1994 Council meeting. BACKGROUND: On March 8, 1994 the City Council of Shakopee ordered the preparation of a feasibility report for improvements to Viking Steel Road and the unnamed street. These improvements were petitioned for by the land owners for the proposed Prairie Bend Development. The feasibility report has been completed and is attached for City Council review. Staff will give a presentation on the entire feasibility report at the public hearing. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 4007. 2. Deny Resolution No. 4007. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1, to adopt Resolution No. 4007. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4007, A Resolution Receiving a Report and Calling a Hearing on an Improvement to Viking Steel Road, From County Road 16 to Trunk Highway 101 and an Unnamed Street from County Road 16 to 4th Avenue, Project No. 1994-10 and move its adoption. DMN/pmp MEM4007 RESOLUTION NO. 4007 On An Improvement To Viking Steel A Resolution CallingR Hearing From County Road 16 o Trunk Highway 101 And An Unnam Street, From County T Road 16 To 4th Avenue Project No. 1994-10 Resolution No. 3967 of the City Council adopted March 8, 1994, WHEREAS,pursuant to improvements of Viking a reared by the City Engineer, with reference to the Steel report has been prepared Road 16 to Trunk Highway 101 and an unnamed street, from County Road 16 to from enuty bystreet construction and installation of utilities, and this report was 16 to 4th Avenue received by the Council on June 7, 1994. E IT RESOLVED BY THE CTS COUNCIL OF THE CITY NOW,THEREFORE,B OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: improvement of Viking Steel Road, from County Road 1. The Council will consider the Road 16 to 4th Avenue by street 16 to Trunk Highway 101 and an unnamed street, from County of utilities in accordance with the report and e the assessment of ant to abutting gtan and installationittedpee spurs ant t uffing and benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvementof 3.88. proposed improvements on the 21st day 2. A public hearing shall be held on such pro p at 129 7:30 P.M. or thereafter, in the Council Chambers of andHall,y published noticSouth June, s Street,94, at Minnesota, and the Clerk shall give mailed of Holmes Shakopee, such hearing and improvement as required by law. 3. The work of this project is hereby designated as part of the 1994-10 Public Improvement Program. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, � Minnesota, held this day of 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney )11 FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR VIKING STEEL ROAD AND AN UNNAMED ROAD 111 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the Iaws of the State of Minnesota. 74.. Date Su. 3/- 9s' Registration No. 19133. I 11 Project Team Ray Ruuska John DeLacey 1 Dave Nummer 111 MAY 1994 1111 Di w lgq y 174i /LL1. CONSENT YID MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Maras Street DATE: June 2, 1994 INTRODUCTION Attached is Resolution No. 4016, which orders a feasibility report prepared for Maras Street. BACKGROUND: Maras Street is located in eastern Shakopee, near the Savage border. It is located east of County Road 18 and south of 13th Avenue, which has now become a frontage road for the Shakopee Bypass/Bloomington Ferry Bridge. The street is currently a dead end street approximately 2,500 feet long and is basically a dirt road with an inadequate gravel base. Over the years, industrial development has occurred on much of this road. Maras Street used to be a private road. In 1989, the City Council determined that due to the development of this road and because of the concern about emergency access being available throughout the entire year, this road should become public and improved to City Standards. Consequently, the Council revised the City Code to prohibit any further building permits on private roads, but rather the City Code now requires property to abut a public street before receiving a building permit. Since that time, staff has worked with the property owners to dedicate all of Maras Street. This process has been a difficult one due to the complexity of some of the parcels involved. Last year the City had obtained 9 of the 12 warranty deeds and in May, 1993 Council directed staff to record these deeds and accept this road as a public street (See attached staff memo dated April 29, 1993). The remaining three warranty deeds have not been able to be obtained due to the reasons outlined in the April 29, 1993 staff memo. Staff feels that the only way the City will be able to obtain the remaining parcels is through the condemnation process. Staff's efforts to date have been to obtain the street right-of-way for the existing gravel road. But, additional right-of-way would be needed to actually construct the road to eliminate the excessive cul-de-sac length. There are several options for connecting this street up to existing streets to eliminate the excessive cul-de-sac, but all of them will require some additional right-of- way. The most effective way to determine the best alternative is to prepare a feasibility report on the improvement options and conduct a public hearing. This project has been a high priority project on the last three Capital Improvements Plans(CIP), but has not proceeded due to the right-of-way issue. This project is included in the 1994 CIP. Staff is requesting authorization to prepare a feasibility report for the improvements and to identify the additional right-of-way needed. If the City Council subsequently orders the improvement, staff would then initiate all property acquisition and condemnation procedures for all necessary right-of-way, not just the three remaining parcels on the existing road. Attached is Resolution No. 4016, which orders the feasibility report for City Council consideration. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 4016. 2. Deny Resolution No. 4016. 3. Table Resolution No. 4016. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. Staff feels the only way to complete closure on this project is to prepare a feasibility report, conduct the public hearing and consider all available options. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4016, A Resolution Ordering the Preparation of a Report on an Improvement to Maras Street, from 13th Avenue South and move its adoption. DEH/pmp MEM4016 _ ____ ____\\\\NNNNN.,..,,, _____ _____ EXIST - NG OA1DS ______ ,____ i 7...„----\ 13TH o 0 \ a h^0 ))___-----)) PRIVATE ROAD AVE.-\---- \ 0W O y.53 PRATE ROAD ° L1 G�\E ^O 2 40Ct\ O ,, IO 'SRti\ 1ip? n 27-099002-0--- ,p -a. D E D I CAT E J R.O.W. Q ANDERSON 00000 .1:109,\ V I Il / n ^/T 0o00 0/ 1/`C 00000 00000 / /1 X11,A�ANtA/ �\� /��� 0 1 V I I I % °g° \ nnnnn N CV N LV N L ..1-;\ 1 ` \ 151° I \ co� ,1°RAS 11 uSo I ,° U ry 9,ry°R�� ^ryO O2 I 1:V1Yc)� ^ 4r �/\'&\1° t P� CITY LIMITS c:ti i:\til-c �° 0 PRIVATE ROAD 222 p� ry0ry� F OTTERSON /0 O O !, Of O i 27-913022-0 Oy'7� �,'j c O(I' �/ry0 )/ 1� O ^�O O N� 0 0° o) 4G c3 <I. \f- 0 7 7 el, G, ry^ v rn \Q ry1 1 \ ry 30ILI\G v) AJ I . z n v) I-- . MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Maras Street DATE: April 29, 1993 INTRODUCTION: Staff is requesting City Council authorization to accept a portion of this private street as a City street. BACKGROUND: Maras Street is currently a private road. It is located in the far eastern edge of Shakopee, east of County Road 18 and south of 13th Avenue (approximately across from the Backstretch Campground parcel). The road is a dead end street about 2500 feet long and basically just a dirt path with inadequate gravel base. Over the years, industrial development has occurred on much of this road. Several years ago, the City Council revised the City Code to prohibit any building permits from being issued unless property abutted a public street. Since then staff has been working with the neighborhood to get this street dedicated. The City Council directed the former City Attorney, Mr. Coller, to draw up the legal documents for all property owners to dedicate this street. Once the staff City Attorney was hired, it was discovered that the documents were not drafted properly, so the process basically started over. In 1992, staff started obtaining the warranty deeds from all property owners for this street. To date, 9 of the 12 necessary deeds have been signed and are ready for recording. The remaining two property owners (one has 2 parcels) are taking longer to obtain due to unusual circumstances. One owner has a medical difficulty (with a spouse) and the other owner has a legal problem with his existing deed. Staff had hoped to take all 12 deeds to the City Council at one time for approval and authorization to accept this street, but since the remaining 3 may take additional time, staff is requesting authorization to record the deeds already signed. Attached is a map indicating the deeds that have already been obtained and the remaining ones. Once this street is dedicated, staff will be requesting authorization to do a feasibility report to upgrade this road to City Standards. As a minimum, the street should at least meet gravel road standards. This project has been a high priority project in the Capital Improvements Program the last 2 years, but has been eliminated each year due to the lack of obtaining the street as a public street. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to direct staff to record all warranty deeds obtained to date for Maras Street and to continue to work towards obtaining all remaining deeds. DEH/pmp MARAS __ ....._ _____ - \ 1 ____ _______ MARAS STIET ..._______ _______ \ t____ \__ ./� ______ \___-- i 13TH AVE. j/ j ..r ______4/ PRIVATE ROAD moi/ P 'hi/A�E ROAD ��' , ,,� ;,�r / \ ri n /�! it DEDICATEJ R.O.W. 27-ossoo2—o : D ANDERSON „„04 i;� �. _ �i// N Y)Va 0 • 88888�!�••• ntoo,no �m.40� N N N N N /' ;life*,; \ , DEED AQUIRED •� •11444 /,..� � wwww_4 PR CO / �j •.•.4% ;•0•:•�� DEED STILL NEEDED Aptvfra 1:4mo i ..w.-./.4 1•'•G •• O / N3' �� 22 :-. ';z :� CITY LIMITS / pJ is/•//A/ ID••••• IVO 4�:�: :44 PRIVATE ROAD ••••• P•••••� PROPOSED NEW 94111.+4• •••••i ROAD (CITY OF • • • p� •�•f•1 �•�•�•� SAVAGE) / F E7 ''m•-.- •��i�i�i • • • OTTERSON O O O 27-913022-0 05",� '1, 0",<vo'�� ry0 0-,Go 0,0 �0 4--00� `0 0� O�� gi. 1. el, 3`IL_I \G RESOLUTION NO. 4016 A Resolution Ordering The Preparation Of A Report On An Improvement To Maras Street, From 13th Avenue South WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve Maras Street from 13th Avenue South by pavement, storm sewer and curb and gutter and to assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the proposed improvement be referred to David E. Hutton, City Engineer, for study and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney CONSENT iXc...., MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Nummer, Staff /714/ SUBJECT: County Road 16 Feasibility Report DATE: May 31, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 4014, a resolution receiving a report and calling for a public hearing for improvements to County Road 16, from County Road 17 to County Road 83. The hearing will be set for the June 21, 1994 Council meeting. BACKGROUND: On February 15, 1994 the City Council of Shakopee ordered the preparation of a feasibility report for improvements to County Road 16. The focus of the report was providing sewer and water service to the County Road 16 corridor in anticipation of Scott County reconstructing the roadway in 1995. The feasibility report has been completed and is attached for City Council review. Staff will give a presentation on the feasibility report at the public hearing. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 4014. 2. Deny Resolution No. 4014. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1, to adopt Resolution No. 4014. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4014, A Resolution Receiving a Report and Calling a Hearing on an Improvement to County Road 16, from County Road 17 to County Road 83, Project No. 1994-11 and move its adoption. DMN/pmp MEM4014 RESOLUTION NO. 4014 A Resolution Receiving A Report And Calling A Hearing On An Improvement To County Road 16, From County Road 17 To County Road 83 Project No. 1994-11 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 3956 of the City Council adopted February 15, 1994, a report has been prepared by the City Engineer, with reference to the improvement of County Road 16, from County Road 17 to County Road 83 by sanitary sewer and water service, and this report was received by the Council on June 7, 1994. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of County Road 16, from County Road 17 to County Road 83 by sanitary sewer and water service in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting and benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $1,095,221.88. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 21st day of June, 1994, at 7:30 P.M. or thereafter, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, at 129 South Holmes Street, Shakopee, Minnesota, and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. 3. The work of this project is hereby designated as part of the 1994-11 Public Improvement Program. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney II • • r= r�w ,. N'�ASIBILITY REPOR' FORS �r x u ; F � xT �'1 --...,•.__ h ,-It .moi•-, ".t-,...:._..4"-_,.,.-,---,...:sDec' 1 Z .. ,-..4,....0, -y,-.:i. • „z .M ik. 7','v'- ■C OITN' r �L ROA]) moi/ I ',,R �/j • 5 ', • d a ti ? r w Y' ky,y y t -"x y .Ct 1,,. k `• ;4 r .6 j ,-' If] - 4 t _1 .-�,..fap� - 1 •7(fl1 ii�.+tl F-,7 —,r.,---,,t.t:i[iir.'1\= I ciT_".4-1)S al„ a� . f ( I I I r• 111 1 r 1 I � 1 ;1- • I ' '%.:+ 11 • ?i;.i! : i_ -!, ;i_71,/ ..?Y- .iiSw' I l �11P'.1� TJII ��c ISI 1 �iiY�3 �7' - • ,._I' - 1%i1ir y 1 . \ ✓ > y l . / • ! IPI • • • S • !_•:".3'. '-:th.••'_: . • 1 111 :': ; ;- f( ••• -; • �.. _ r'.....: flit til. ri. 1 iyci MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Met Council Water Quality Grants X DATE: June 2, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 4017, which authorizes the filing of a grant application for the Met Council Water Quality Program. BACKGROUND: The Met Council has established a Water Quality Initiative Grant Program. This program is targeted towards improving the water quality in the Mississippi, St. Croix and Minnesota Rivers. The grant program will provide approximately $2.0 million dollars a year for the next five years. The maximum grant amount for any single project is $100,000.00. The grants require a 25% matching contribution by the local governments. The 25% match can be cash or in-kind services (i.e. land values, staff time, etc.) or a combination of each. Attachment No. 1 is a letter from Met Council explaining the grant program. Staff did attend the April 7, 1994 meeting to obtain additional information on the grant program. Attachment No. 2 is a summary of the grant process which was presented at that meeting. Cities and organizations within the three river basins were specifically targeted for this program and encourage to submit grant applications. Staff, along with the City's water resources consultant, Mr. Pete Willenbring of Orr-Schelen- Mayeron& Assoc., Inc. (OSM) have identified three potential projects for this program and have submitted the grant applications to Met Council for them. The deadline for applying was May 13, 1994 and due to the short time frame in which to prepare the applications, staff was unable to submit this to Council for consideration prior to the deadline. Staff would like Council to consider these applications at this time and attached is Resolution No. 4017, which authorizes the filing of the applications. If the City Council does not want to proceed with all of these projects and if the grant applications are successful the City Council could always reject the grants at that time. Two of the projects involve the construction of settling basins at the storm sewer outlet to the Minnesota River. Settling basins are important in that they remove non-point pollutants from the water and allow them to settle out prior to discharging to the river. Most new developments are required to construct settling basins or ponds. but most of the existing storm sewers in Shakopee are not run through a settling basin or pond. The estimated City cost for each of these settling basins is $35,000.00. Funding is proposed to come from the Storm Drainage Utility Fund as these are system improvements. The third grant staff is proposing is a public educational program. This program would put together education materials dealing with fertilizer and pesticide use, grass clippings, leaves, used oil and paint (i.e. avoiding putting these items in storm sewers or floor drains, etc.). The estimated amount of City contribution to this program is $20,000.00. Attached is Resolution No. 4017, authorizing staff to submit these grant applications. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 4017. 2. Deny Resolution No. 4017. 3. Amend Resolution No. 4017. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. Shakopee has always been a strong advocate in improving the water quality in the Minnesota River as evidenced by the construction of the Upper Valley Drainageway (as opposed to storm sewers), detention ponds, erosion control standards and an active street sweeping program. The three grant programs proposed would continue strengthening Shakopee's standing on cleaning up the river. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4017, A Resolution Authorizing the Submittal of Three Applications for the Met Council Water Quality Initiative Grant Program and move its adoption. DEH/pmp MEM4017 • RESOLUTION NO. 4017 A Resolution Authorizing The Submittal Of Three Applications For The Met Council Water Quality Initiative Grant Program WHEREAS, the Met Council has established a Water Quality Intiative Grant Program for the Twin Cities area; and WHEREAS,the City of Shakopee is concerned about the water quality in the Minnesota River. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, 1. That, the City Council of Shakopee hereby authorizes the submittal of three grant applications to the Met Council titled as follows: 1. Mill Pond Treatment Basin 2. Trunk Highway 101 Treatment Basin 3. Water Quality Education Program 2. That, David E. Hutton, Public Works Director is hereby disgnated as the project representative for the City of Shakopee. 3. That, the City of Shakopee will commit to a 25% sach or in-kind contribution to the projects as described in the grant applications. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the day , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ItMetropolitati Council Advocating regional economic, societal and environmental issues and solutions March 11, 1994 Dear Potential Grant Applicant: The Metropolitan Council is pleased to announce the Twin Cities Water Quality Initiative, a new grant program that focuses on abating, controlling and preventing nonpoint pollution to the Mississippi, St. Croix and Minnesota Rivers. The Council is administering the program as part of an agreement with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. The Commission, through its user charge system, will fund this program at about $10 million over the next five years. This grant program is open to public entities including federal, state, county and city governments, soil and water conservation districts, watershed management organizations, public schools, and trade or professional organizations. The maximum grant amount is $100,000 annually, with a requirement of a 25 percent match of cash or in-kind funds. • The Council will hold an information meeting for potential grant applicants on Thursday, April 7, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council offices, 230 E. Fifth St. in downtown St. Paul. To register for the meeting, please contact Patti Holmes at (612) 291-6401. Grant application packages, Publication Number 32-94-027, are available by calling the Council's Data Center (612) 291-8140 or TDD (612) 291-0904. Additional information regarding the grant can be obtained froin Jack Frost, program manager, at (612) 291-6519. Submittal deadline for the grant application is Friday, May 13, 1994, at 4:00 p.m. Thank you for your interest. Sincerely, n �� iC) ._. Dottie Rietow Chair Mears Park Cr�tre 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul. Mir.--esota 55101-1634 712 291-r';'71 Fax 291-6550. TDD 2911.0904 ®aeCycIEC Papp.. An Ea_.:'Opportu,...: Ernploi_- ATTACHMENT NO . 1 A Metropolitan Council AA Advocating regional economic, societal and environmental issues and solutions March 11, 1994 • Dear Potential Grant Applicant: The Metropolitan Council is pleased to announce the Twin Cities Water Quality Initiative, a new grant program that focuses on abating, controlling and preventing nonpoint pollution to the Mississippi, St. Croix and Minnesota Rivers. The Council is administering the program as part of an agreement with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. The Commission, through its user charge system, will fund this program at about $10 million over the next five years. This grant program is open to public entities including federal, state, county and city governments, soil and water conservation districts, watershed management organizations, public schools, and trade or professional organizations. The maximum grant amount is $100,000 annually, with a requirement of a 25 percent match of cash or in-kind funds. The Council will hold an information meeting for potential grant applicants on Thursday, April 7, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council offices, 230 E. Fifth St. in downtown St. Paul. To register for the meeting, please contact Patti Holmes at (612) 291-6401. Grant application packages, Publication Number 32-94-027, are available by calling the Council's Data Center (612) 291-8140 or TDD (612) 291-0904. Additional information regarding the grant can be obtained from Jack Frost, program manager, at (612) 291-6519. Submittal deadline for the grant application is Friday, May 13, 1994, at 4:00 p.m. Thank you for your interest. Sincerely, Dottie Rietow Chair Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street St.Paul,Minnesota 55101-1634 612 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TDD 291-0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer �• Recycled Paper ATT.Z.CHMENT NO . 2 TWIN CITIES WATER QUALITY INITIATIVE Grant Process: Key Points Payment Schedule • 25 percent of the grant is paid when a grant agreement is fully executed. • 35 percent of the grant is paid when the Council approves the grantee's required written work plan. • No more than 30 percent of the grant is paid when the grantee has expended 50 percent of the total eligible project costs, and when the Council has received, reviewed and approved the grantee's expenditures and activities report, including a comparison of projected and actual expenditures. • Final payment of at least 10 percent will be made to the grantee when the activities have been completed according to the terms of the contract and the final grant report is approved by the Council. Required Documentation • The grantee must document that grant funds were spent and how they were spent. • Documentation of expenditures could include: paid invoices, with date of payment and check number; copies of checks with invoices or receipts; copies of cancelled checks with memo indicating invoice number or copy of invoice and receipt; a written statement by authorized official stating the amount, date, and purpose of expenditures that do not have receipts or invoices (for example, the cost of making copies directly related to the grant activities). Other forms of documentation can be discussed with grants staff. • Every piece of documentation should indicate the purpose for which the funds were spent and the date of purchase or service performance. Each piece should also be cross-referenced to budget line-items. Reporting Schedule • Reports on expenditures and activities are required twice each year. They must be submitted to the Council within 30 days after the end of each six-month period of the contract period. • In addition, an expenditures and activities report is required when 50 percent of the funds have been spent. • A final report is required at the end of the project period. Council Expectations: Budget and Timing • The grantee budget and work plan must indicate when activities A through Z will be performed in a given time period and for what given dollar amount. If the grantee performs only A through T and runs out of money, the grantee must complete the project activities at his/her expense. No additional funds will be provided for work outlined in the work plan. • The Council expects the grantee to perform in accordance with their work plan and budget. Audits • Random audits will be conducted on completed grants. • Adherence to documentation requirements is essential for payment of grant funds and for an audit, should your grant be selected. • All records related to the receipt and expenditure of grant funds must be maintained in an accessible form for at least three years following closure of the grant contract. Records related to installation, operation and maintenance of best management practices must be maintained for three years beyond the design or useful life of the project, whichever is longer. Don't Hesitate to Call • • If you have questions about eligibility criteria or other project-related issues as you prepare your application, call Jack Frost at 291-6519. Questions about the grant administration process should be directed to Victoria Reinhardt, 291-6536. The Council's telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) number is 291-0904. • Metropolitan Council Advocating regional economic, societal and environmental issues and solutions Mears Park Centre 230East Fifth Street St.Paul,Minnesota 55101.1634 onslt Orr Schelen Mayeron& Associates,Inc. 300 Park Place Center 5775 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis,MN 55416-1228 May 23, 1994 612-595-577%, 1-800-7 -s FAX 5 74 4v • -sneers • f• -cu Mr. Dave Hutton • qy.0S Surve:•� City of Shakopee �C I"�"f 129 East 1st Avenue > Shako ee MN 55379 Pt Shakopee, Re: Twin City Water Quality Initiative Grant Applications OSM Project No. 1775.73 Dear Dave: We have completed and submitted the appropriate grant applications requesting funds from the Twin Cities Water Quality Initiative Grant Program for three potential projects within the City of Shakopee. The three projects for which the grant applications were submitted are the Mill Pond Treatment Basin, the T.H. 101 Treatment Basin and the Water Quality Education Program. These grant applications were submitted by the deadline date of May 13, 1994 as established by the Metropolitan Council. They were submitted with the understanding that following information would be obtained from the City and forwarded to Met Council at the earliest possible date: 1. A resolution from the City Council which must include the following: ► Authorization for the filing of the grant application. ► Designation of authority to the project representative. ► Indication of commitment for the support of the project. ► Indicate the amount and type of commitment. 2. Your signature on Page T-15 in space No. 7. 3. Appropriate signatures on Page T-16. Enclosed you will find the appropriate pages for each grant application. Please provide the information listed above and send to Jack Frost, Metropolitan Council, Water Management Unit, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, MN 55101, at your earliest convenience. Mr. Dave Hutton May 23, 1994 Page 2 If you have any questions or concerning the requested information or the grant application, please feel free to contact me at 595-5767. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. Manager, Water Resource Department enclosures H:\1775.73\WATER\LE I LRS\940523.DH TWIN CITIES WATER QUALITY INITIATIVE GRANT APPLICATION for WATER QUALITY EDUCATION PROGRAM Prepared For THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE 1 Iff PART II - PROJECT SU.NBLARY 1 Please include a project summary (maximum of 4 pages) that describes your project. Include goals, objectives, a short description of the project and evaluation. The summary should be accompanied by a map (size 8 112 by 11 inches) showing the location of the target area of the 1 educational project. The goal of the water quality educational program for the City of Shakopee is to use water quality monitoring in conjunction with a newsletter mailing to educate the City Staff, Council, residents, businesses and farmers on the impact of their activities on the quality of surface water runoff discharged to the Minnesota River. This educational project consists of two parts, the first part being the monitoring of water quality within the City of Shakopee at ten selected points, shown in Figure 1. The second part of the water quality monitoring education project consists of mailing a newsletter to the 1 residents of the City of Shakopee through which the results of the water quality monitoring effort will be presented to them. • Below is an outline which describes the tasks associated with the water quality monitoring effort for the City of Shakopee. It is proposed that this water quality monitoring effort be extended over a three-year period from 1995 to 1997. I. Collection of Stormwater Quality Monitoring Samples • A total of seven water quality monitoring samples will be collected from each monitoring site from 1995 to 1997. • Water quality monitoring samples will be obtained using grab-sampling procedure. • Sampled events will include base flow and storm flow events. • Monitoring sites will be monitored in the field for dissolved oxygen, temperature and pH. • Grab samples will be analyzed for total phosphorus, orthophosphorus and total suspended solids. • A total of 210 samples will be collected during the monitoring period. E-2 I 1 .� 1 II. Analysis and Interpretation of Data 1 • Summarize data obtained in the field. • Summarize data received from the laboratory analysis of the water quality 1 parameters. • Estimate annual loadings to the Minnesota River. • Estimate the treatment efficiency of existing wetlands. J Make recommendations for future monitoring activities. III. Final Report • Prepare the data and interpretation into report format. • Review findings of the Water QualityMonitoringActivities with the City. .. • Make recommendations for the possible improvement of stormwater quality for areas where phosphorus or suspended solids levels were found to be present at unacceptable levels. Below is a list of the tasks defining the preparation and mailing of an educational city-wide 3 newsletter for water resource related issues. I. Preparation of Draft Newsletter • Prepare four to five feature articles for the newsletter. • Possible topics for articles could include information on water quality within the City, activities the City is currently undertaking in stormwater management, water quality monitoring activities the City is undertaking, notes regarding 1 future projects, and best management practices for homeowners, businesses and farmers. 1 • Determine the appropriate size of the document. .1 • Prepare black and white copies of the draft newsletter. II. Make Revisions to the Draft Newsletter 1 • Review the draft newsletter with the CityStaff. Council, and appropriate ' agencies. 1 1 • Revise the newsletter based on comments made by the City Staff, Council, and other agencies. • Prepare a final camera-readydocument of the newsletter. P 1 Provide the City a copy of this camera-ready document for their final review. 1 III. Print Newsletter • Evaluate possible alternatives for printing the newsletter. • Variables affecting the cost to print the newsletter include quantity printed, 1 number of colors incorporated into the document, and the type of paper used. The total estimated cost for this project, which includes three years of sampling and the production and mailing of the city-wide newsletter, is estimated at $80,000. I I I I J I I 1 1 l TWIN CITY WATER QUALITY INITIATIVE EDUCATION PROJECT GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE TRUNK HIGHWAY 101 TREATMENT BASIN I I PART IL '- PROJECT SUMMARY Please include a project summary (maximum of 4 pages) that describes your project Include goals, objectives, a short description of the project and an evaluation. Also mention the project 1 timeline, other co-sponsors or any other pertinent information. The summary should be accompanied by a map showing the location of the project within the watershed. The goal of this project is to improve the quality of stormwater runoff received by the Minnesota River by constructing a stormwater treatment basin at the outfall of a 385 acre lindustrial watershed located in north central Shakopee. This watershed is shown in Figure 1. This watershed is directly tributary to the Minnesota River and currently stormwater run- . off from this area does not receive treatment prior to this water entering the Minnesota lRiver. It is estimated that this stormwater treatment basin when constructed will remove 67 lbs. of total phosphorus, 24,016 lbs. of suspended solids and 2,978 lbs. of BOD annually. These estimates were obtained by the use of Dr. William Walker's "P8 Urban Catchment Program". The project is anticipated to begin construction in the spring or summer of 1995 with a j completion date of no later than the fall of 1996. The City of Shakopee will be the sponsor of this project and will provide the funding for this project above and beyond the $97,500 contribution by the Metropolitan Council. The total estimated cost to construct this stormwater treatment basin is $130,000. As part of this project, water quality monitoring for nutrients and suspended solids will also j be undertaken at the inflow and outflow of the stormwater treatment basin in order to J determine the effectiveness of this stormwater treatment basin. I 1 l 1 (attach additional sheets as necessary) l T-2 1 • TWIN CITIES WATER QUALITY INITIATIVE GRANT APPLICATION For MILL POND TREATMENT BASIN Prepared For THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE i PART II - PROJECT STJ 1LARY Please include a project summary (maximum of 4 pages) that describes your project. Include goals, objectives, a short description of the project and an evaluation. Also mention the project 1 timeline, other co-sponsors or any other pertinent information. The summary should be accompanied by a map showing the location of the project within the watershed. 1 The goal of this project is to improve the quality of stormwater runoff received by the Minnesota River by constructing a stormwater treatment basin at the outfall of the Shakopee Upper Valley Drainageway. The Shakopee Upper Valley Drainageway receives stormwater runoff from its 8400 acre watershed located within the City of Shakopee and the Townships of Louisville and Jackson. This watershed is shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the configuration of the stormwater treatment basin located at the outfall of the Upper 1 Valley Drainageway. 1 The project is anticipated to begin construction in the spring or summer of 1995 with a completion date of no later than the fall of 1996. The City of Shakopee will be the sponsor of this project and will provide the funding for this project above and beyond the S100,000 1 contribution by the Metropolitan Council. The total estimated cost to construct this stormwater treatment basin is $135,000. 1 As part of this project, water quality monitoring for nutrients and suspended solids will also be undertaken at the inflow and outflow of the stormwater treatment basin in order to determine the effectiveness of this basin as a stormwater treatment system. l 1 l l l I I T-2 11 ffI PART VI PROJECT AND;CONTRIBUTI�NG SPONSOR INFORMATION I A. Project Sponsor Brief Description of Sources of Support and Supporting Activities: Cash Contribution $ 35,000 ; In-kind Contribution S Description of Project Activities and Sources of Funds: City of Shakopee Storm Drainage Utility Fund This grant application has been prepared at the request of the City Staff. A resolution from the City Council will be forwarded following their next scheduled meeting. The Lower Minnesota River Watershed District and the Scott County Soil and Water Conservation District have been consulted concerning this grant application. For the project sponsor, please include a resolution from the Governing Board that (1) authorizes the filing of the application; (2) designates authority to the project representative; • (3) indicates a commitment of support for the project; and (4) indicates the amount and type of commitment. Written documentation must be provided that indicates the project sponsor has consulted with the watershed management organization(s) and the soil and water conservation district(s) in the project area in preparing the application. T-10 PART X - PROJECT SPONSOR'S CERTIFICATION 11 l BE IT CERTIFIED THAT: 1) The Ci ty of Shakopee will act as the sponsor and (Project Sponsor) grantee for the Twin Cities Water Quality Initiative grant during the period from 2) 8/94 start date) through 3) 8/97 (end date) 4) Peter R. Willenbrinq ► P.E.► Manager Water Resource Dept.► OSM & Assoc. (Name and title of authorized official) is hereby authorized to submit a grant proposal and request funding for this project to the Metropolitan Council and to execute such agreements and prepare documents as necessary to accept funds and implement the project on behalf of the Project Sponsor. This certification certifies the following: 1. The Project Sponsor is an eligible applicant for the Twin Cities Water Quality Initiative Grant Program. 2. The project is consistent with an approved watershed management plan prepared under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 103B. 3. The Project Sponsor agrees to comply with all applicable laws relating to nondiscrimination and affirmative action. 4. The Project Sponsor will provide all local and state permits, licenses and authorizations necessary for the project 5. This project will not negatively impact an identified private provider of similar services. 6. Acknowledgment will be made for the Council and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's grant assistance on all promotional materials, reports and publications relating to the project during the grant period. 7. The Project Sponsor will provide all documentation and reports required by the Council during the grant period. 8. The proposal is complete and all information provided in the proposal is true and accurate. I HEREBY CERTIFY: 5) 5/l3/ i L( (Date formally approved) > �.,. 5k-k (Signature of Authorized Official) (Date) 7) (Signature of Project Director) (Date) T-15 PART X1 - UTHORIZED SIGNATU`RE To the best of my knowledge and belief, data in the application aand the supplemental aatabody provided is true and correct, and this application has been duly by the governing of the applicant. (Presiding Officer of Project Sponsor) (Date) (Title) Attested by (Date) (Title) Please send the completed application to: Jack Frost Management Unit Metropolitan Council 230 East Fifth Street St Paul, MN 55101 • . **Application must be received in the Metropolitan Council's offices by no later 4:00 p.m. on Friday, May 13, 1994. T-16 LLPART'VI -PROJECT A� 'CONTRIBUTING SPONSOR INFORMATION ` AND __ A. Project Sponsor Brief Description of Sources of Support and Supporting Activities: Cash Contribution $ 32,500 ; In-kind Contribution $ Description of Project Activities and Sources of Funds: These Funds shall be made available through assessment to benefitted properties. This grant application has been prepared at the request of the City Staff. A resolution from the City Council will be forwarded following their next scheduled meeting. The Lower Minnesota River Watershed District and the Scott County Soil and Water Conservation District have been consulted concerning this grant application. For the project sponsor, please include a resolution from the Governing Board that: (1) authorizes the filing of the application; (2) designates authority to the project representative; (3) indicates a commitment of support for the project; and (4) indicates the amount and type of commitment. Written documentation must be provided that indicates the project sponsor has consulted with the watershed management organization(s) and the soil and water conservation district(s) in the project area in preparing the application. T-10 II PART X - PROJECT SPONSOR'S CERTIFICATION 11 BE IT CERTIFIED THAT: 1) The City of Shakopee will act as the sponsor and (Project Sponsor) grantee for the Twin Cities Water Quality Initiative grant during the period from 2) (start date) through 3) 10-1-97 (end date) 4) Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. Manager Water Resource Dept., OSM & Associates, Inc. (Name and title of authorized official) is hereby authorized to submit a grant proposal and request funding for this project to the Metropolitan Council and to execute such agreements and prepare documents as necessary to accept funds and implement the project on behalf of the Project Sponsor. This certification certifies the following: 1. The Project Sponsor is an eligible applicant for the Twin Cities Water Quality Initiative Grant Program. 2. The project is consistent with an approved watershed management plan prepared under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 103B. 3. The Project Sponsor agrees to comply with all applicable laws relating to nondiscrimination and affirmative action. 4. The Project Sponsor will provide all local and state permits, licenses and authorizations necessary for the project. 5. This project will not negatively impact an identified private provider of similar services. 6. Acknowledgment will be made for the Council and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's grant assistance on all promotional materials, reports and publications relating to the project during the grant period. 7. The Project Sponsor will provide all documentation and reports required by the Council during the grant period. 8. The proposal is complete and all information provided in the proposal is true and accurate. I HEREBY CERTIFY: (Date formallyapproved) roved pP ) 13(9,4 ' W (Date (Signature of Authorized Official) 7) (Date) (Signature of Project Director) T-15 PART'X1. AUTHORIZEDSIGNATURE To the best of my knowledgeand belief. a ta in application the been duly authorized by'emental data the governing body provided is true and correct, and thispp of the applicant. (Presiding Officer of Project Sponsor) (Date) (Title) Attested by (Date) (Title) Please send the completed application to: Jack Frost Water Management Unit Metropolitan Council 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 • **Application must be received in the Metropolitan Council's offices by no later 4:00 p.m. on Friday, May 13, 1994. T-16 • fI PART VI - PROJECT AND CONTRIBUTING SPONSOR INFORMATION A. Project Sponsor Brief Description of Sources of Support and Supporting Activities: Cash Contribution $ 20,000 In-kind Contribution $ Description of Project Activities and Sources of Funds: City of Shakopee Storm Drainage Utility Fund This grant application has been prepared at the request of the City Staff. A resolution from the City Council will be forwarded following their next scheduled meeting. The Lower Minnesota River Watershed District and the Scott County Soil and Water Conservation District have been consulted concerning this grant application. For the project sponsor, please include a resolution from the Governing Board that: (1) authorizes the filing of the application; (2) designates authority to the project representative; (3) indicates a commitment of support for the project; and (4) indicates the amount and type of commitment. Written documentation must be provided that indicates the project sponsor has consulted with the watershed management organization(s) and the soil and water conservation district(s) in the project area in preparing the application. E-7 11 VIII - PROJECT SPONSOR'S CERTIFICATION 11 BE IT CER 11t 1hD THAT: 1) City of Shakopee will act as the sponsor and (Project Sponsor) 1995 grantee for the Twin Cities Water Quality Initiative grant during the period from 2) (start date) through 3) 1997 (end date) 4) Peter R. Willenbring, P.E.• of OSM . A=gnr•i at-aa (Name and title of authorized official) is hereby authorized to submit a grant proposal and request funding for this project to the Metropolitan Council and to execute such agreements and prepare documents as necessary to accept funds and implement the project on behalf of the Project Sponsor. This certification certifies the following: 1. The Project Sponsor is an eligible applicant for the Twin Cities Water Quality Initiative Grant Program. 2. The project is consistent'with an approved watershed management plan prepared under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 103B. 3. The Project Sponsor agrees to comply with all applicable laws relating to nondiscrimination and affirmative action. 4. The Project Sponsor will provide all local and state permits, licenses and authorizations necessary for the project. S. This project will not negatively impact an identified private provider of similar services. 6. Acknowledgment will be made for the Council and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's grant assistance on all promotional materials, reports and publications relating to the project during the grant period. 7. The Project Sponsor will provide all documentation and reports required by the Council during the grant period. 8. The proposal is complete and all information provided in the proposal is true and accurate. I HEREBY CERTIFY: `1 i S l 1 (Date formally approved) 6) ' , __ (3( L( - -- — (Signature of Authorized Official) (Date) (Signature of Project Director) (Date) E-11 PART XIAUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: To the best of my knowledge and belief, data in the application and the supplemental data provided is true and correct, and this application has been duly authorized by the governing body of the applicant. (Presiding Officer of Project Sponsor) (Date) (Title) Attested by (Date) (Title) PIease send the completed application to: ck Frost Water Management Unit Metropolitan Council 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 **Application must be received in the Metropolitan Council's offices by no later 4:00 p.m. on Friday, May 13, 1994. E-12 14 /59 . TO:Dennis Kraft City Admininstrator From: Frank Ries , Fire Chief Date: 06/06/94 Re: Aerial Platform Truck With construction of the new aerial nearing completion, the present unit will be removed from service. It is requested that the present aerial unit be declared as surplus equipment, and that this unit be advertised for sale . Sincerely, Frank Ries • Fire Chief ACTION REQUESTED: Move to declare the present aerial unit as surplus equipment and authorize the City Administrator to take the appropriate action for disposal . Jib MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Minibypass DATE: June 7, 1994 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND: Section 10.60 (Subv. 3.D) indicates that construction activities can only take place between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M. for noise elimination and prevention. Attached is a request from Mn/DOT's Contractor on the Minibypass, C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc., to waive this requirement of the City Code for purposes of paving the remainder of the project. Due to traffic concerns, Mn/DOT normally prefers to pave at night. The Contractor is proposing to work from 8:00 P.M. though 6:00 A.M. for two nights. The exact days for working are somewhat dependent on the weather, but the Contractor has indicated they would like to pave either this week or next. The City Council has waived this section of the City Code for other short term construction activities. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to waive the noise prevention section of the City Code for construction activities (Section 10.60 Subd. 3.D) to allow C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. to perform paving operations at night on the Minibypass Project. DEH/pmp MINIBYPASS I#ZiIIc McCrossan Construction,/nc. General Contractors Box 1240. 7865 Jefferson Highway. Maple Grove. Minnesota 55311-6240 612/425-4167 Fax: Estimating 612/425-0520 • Administration 612/425-1255 O June 1, 1994 �uSh sl klittp Mr. Dave Hutton p� City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: MNDOT Project SP 7005-60 (CSM Project 1349) Dear Mr. Hutton: C.S. McCrossan Construction hereby requests a variance in the noise ordinance for ti nighttime pavii g of the mainline. The hours of work would be from 8:00 PM through 6:00 AM. I expect the paving to take two nights. Your cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely. ThOriArrAcCf Project Manager TM:Ik