Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06/21/1994
TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ.REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JUNE 21, 1994 LOCATION: City Hall, 129 Holmes Street South Mayor Gary Laurent presiding 1] Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M. 2] Approval of Agenda 3) Recess for H.R.A. Meeting 4] Re-convene 5) Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 6] Mayor's Report 7] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 8] Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. ) *9] Approval of Minutes: None 10] Communications: a) 1993 Auditor's Report (see also agenda item #13b) b) Marge Henderson regarding community center - verbal c] Joe Zak regarding community center *d) City of Afton regarding League of Mn. Cities Insurance Trust appeal to the Mn. Supreme Court e] Shirley Olson, Murphy's Landing, regarding relocating the East entrance drive 11] PUBLIC HEARINGS: a] 7 : 00 P.M. - Vacation of Vierling Drive between CR-15 and Harrison Street and a portion of Presidential Lane - Res. No. 4022 b) 7 : 00 P.M. - Vacation of 20' utility easement on two lots, Lots 4 & 5, Block 1 , Valley Park 6th (4401 Valley Industrial Blvd. So. ) - Res. No. 4023 c] 7 : 00 P.M. - Vacation of 10' drainage and utility ease- ments along interior lot lines, Lots 2 & 3 , Block 1, Century Plaza Square 3rd, between Super 8 Motel and Eagle Creek Plaza - Res. No. 4024 TENTATIVE AGENDA June 21, 1994 Page -2- 11] Public Hearings continued: d] 7: 30 P.M. - Improvements to Viking Steel Road from CR-16 to TH-101 and to an Unnamed Street from CR-16 to 4th Ave. - Res. No. 4025 e] 8 : 00 P.M. - Improvements to CR-16 from CR-17 to CR-83 by sanitary sewer and water service - Res. 4026 12] Recommendations from Boards and Commissions: Planning Commission: *a] Princes Marble Rezoning Request From B-i to I-2 - Ord. 379 *b] Preliminary/Final Plat for Monnens Addition, lying E of Market Street and S of 5th Avenue - Res. No. 4031 *c] Preliminary/Final Planned Unit Development for Scherer Brothers Lumber, lying N of 4th Avenue, S of TH-101 and W of Certainteed - Res. No. 4030 *d] Final Plat for Minnesota Valley 8th Addition, located at the intersection of Vierling Dr. and Presidential Lane - Res. No. 4029 13] Reports from Staff: a] Pawnshop and Pawnbroker's Licenses b] 1993 Annual Financial Report *c] Massage Center License - Klip and Kurl *d] Resolution and Annexation Agreement e] Fuller Street Realignment *f] 1994 Wine Licenses *g] 1994 Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor Licenses *h] 1994 Intoxicating Liquor Licenses *i] Approve Bills in the Amount of $4 , 141, 923 . 03 ($2 , 650, 000. 00 is a transfer of funds) *j ] Nominations to Planning Commission k] Meetings for July and August - Res. No. 4032 1] 1994/95 Insurance Renewals m] Community Center - Dissemination of Information 14 ] Resolutions and Ordinances: *a] Ord. No. 376 - Renaming Indigo Lane to Mound Street *b] Res . No. 4021 - Approving Plans and Ordering Ad for Bids for 1994-12 Pavement Preservation *c] Res. No. 4027 - Accepting Bids on 1994-9 Public Works Parking Lot d] Res. No. 4028 - Receiving Report and Setting Public Hear- ing on Alley in Block 51, Project 1994-14 15] Other Business: 16; Adjourn Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator J I a, MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer SUBJECT: Vacation of Vierling Drive and Presidential Lane DATE: June 16, 1994 INTRODUCTION: At the May 17, 1994 meeting, the City Council set a public hearing for the vacation of a portion of Vierling Drive west of County Road 15, and a portion of Presidential Lane adjacent to Vierling Drive. BACKGROUND: On March 8, 1994 the City Council of Shakopee ordered the improvement of Vierling Drive from County Road 15 to Presidential Lane. Vierling Drive will be constructed along an alignment which was recommended in a feasibility report which was prepared by staff. The new alignment swings south of the existing Vierling Drive right-of-way in order to move collector street traffic away from the established neighborhood along the existing Vierling Drive. The entire existing right-of-way from County Road 15 to Presidential Lane is being considered for vacation. This right-of-way had been previously dedicated through the platting of South Parkview 1st Addition and Minnesota Valley 3rd Addition. Although the right-of-way has been dedicated, there have been no improvements made in the area being vacated. When the existing right-of-way has been vacated, the right-of-way along the new alignment can be dedicated. The 1990 Comprehensive Plan has designated the area for residential uses. Vierling Drive is designated as a collector street with the intent of connecting local streets in the neighborhood with other collector and arterial streets such as County Road 15 and Trunk Highway 169. At the June 9, 1994 meeting the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed vacation. The Planning Commission determined that the proposed vacation was in compliance with the goals established in the Comprehensive Plan. Attached is Resolution No. 4022, A Resolution Vacating a Portion of Vierling Drive Between County Road 15 and Harrison Street, and a Portion of Presidential Lane, and move its adoption. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 4022. 2. Deny Resolution No. 4022. 3. Continue the public hearing to obtain additional information from staff. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4022, A Resolution Vacating a Portion of Vierling Drive Between County Road 15 and Harrison Street, and a Portion of Presidential Lane, and move its adoption. DMN/pmp MEM4022 RESOLUTION NO. 4022 A Resolution Vacating A Portion Of Vierling Drive Between County Road 15 And Harrison Street, And A Portion Of Presidential Lane WHEREAS, it has been made to appear to the Shakopee City Council that Vierling Drive between County Road 15 and Harrison Street, and a portion of Presidential Lane serves little public use or interest; and WHEREAS, the public hearing to consider the action to vacate was held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall of Shakopee at 7:00 P.M. or thereafter on the 21st day of June, 1994; and WHEREAS, two weeks published notice has been given in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and posted notice has been given by posting such notice on the bulletin board on the main floor of the Scott County Courthouse, the bulletin board at Shakopee Public Utilities, the bulletin board at the U.S. Post Office, the bulletin board at the Shakopee Public Library, and the bulletin board in the Shakopee City Hall; and WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard in the matter were given an opportunity to be heard at the public hearing in the Council Chambers in the City of Shakopee. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. That it funds and determines that the vacation hereinafter described is in the public interest; 2. The portions of Vierling Drive and Presidential Lane are described on Attachments A, B and C and those attachments are hereby included in this document. 3. That the area as described in Attachments A, B and C, serves no further public need; 4. That the area as described in Attachments A, B and C, be, and the same hereby is vacate: 5. After the adoption of the resolution the City Clerk shall file certified copies hereof with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Scott County. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney ATTACHMENT A mitOrr __ SChelen 300 Park Place Center 512-595-5 7 5 Mayeron& 5775 Wayzata Boulevard 1-800-753-5775 Associates,Inc. Minneapolis,MN 55416-1228 FAX 595-5774 PORTION OF 13TH AVENUE TO BE VACATED WITHIN SOUTH PARKVIEW 1ST ADDITION All that part of 13th Avenue, according to the plat of South Parkview 1st Addition, on file in the office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota, which lies westerly of the the easterly 495.56 feet of said 13th Avenue as measured along the centerline thereof. Said proposed street vacation contains 1.527 acres more or less. NOTE: No boundary survey work was performed as to the precise I hereby certify that this survey,plan,or report was prepared by location of this tractme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed land surveyor under the laws of the State f Minnesota. fi6- { � y d Ames,LS. Lic.No.11394 Dat D.Edward t:AsaDEAa.XLS 'Engineers • Architects • P:arrers • Sur.e.cirs ATTACHMENT B OIMISItia Orr Widen 300 Park Place Center 612-595-5775 Mayeron& 5775 Wayzata Boulevard 1-800-753-5775 Associates,Inc. Minneapolis,MN 55416-1228 FAX 595-5774 PORTION OF 13TH AVENUE AND-PRESIDENTIAL LANE IN THE PLAT OF MINNESOTA VALLEY 3RD ADDITION That part of 13th Avenue, according to the plat of Minnesota Valley 3rd Addition, on file in the office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota, which lies easterly of the easterly right of way line of Presidential Lane, according to said plat. That part of Presidential Lane, according to the plat of Minnesota Valley 3rd Addition on file in the office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota, which lies southerly of the southerly right of way line of 13th Avenue, according to said plat. Said street vacations contain 0.42 acres more or less. NOTE: No boundary survey work was performed as to the precise I hereby certify that this survey,plan,or report was prepared by location of this tract me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed land surveyor under the laws of the State of innesota. •ard Antes,L S. Lic.`o. 11394 Data D. di) .' EASEDEA2 XLS Engineers • Architects • Planners • Surveyors ATTACHMENT C Orr cism. Schelen Mayeron& 300 Park Place Center612-595-5775 5775 Wayzata Boulevard 1-800-753-5775 Assodates,Inc. Minneapolis,MN 55.16-1228 FAX 595-5774 Description of portions of 13th Avenue to be vacated within the plat of Minnesota Valley 3rd Addition. That part of the north 10.00 feet of 13th Avenue, according to the plat of Minnesota Valley 3rd Addition on file in the office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota, which lies westerly of the westerly right of way line of Presidential Lane, according to said plat, and lies easterly of the southerly extension of the easterly right of way line of Harrison Street, according to said plat. That part of the south 10.00 feet of 13th Avenue, according to the plat of Minnesota Valley 3rd Addition on file in the office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota, which lies westerly of the easterly right of way line of Presidential Lane, according to said plat, and lies easterly of the northerly extension of the westerly line of Lot 8, Block 5, according to said plat. Said street vacation contains 0.308 acres more or less. H:\1775.64\St;RV•,M1SC\l3THAVE.DES NOTE: No boundary survey work was performed as to the precise I hereby certify that this survey,plan,or report was prepared by location of this tract. me or under my direct supervision and that I ant a duly licensed Cdsurveyor under the laws of the. of Minnesota. _a7 r) c,„:,, ,r7'..-.44 -57Z C/7. D.Edward Ames.L.S. Lic.No. 11394 Date EsS=_DEA2.XLS Erg:neers • -.._-:xcts • P:a--:rs • Surverers 111 M AC AGRICULTURE EXHIBIT_ A . R1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL - it'" ` .t 'y2 •": — R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL -- T; =1 „ I,;• - ,i,t,`. 4, '•`-•• . — R3 MID-DENSITY RES. Aie --'f 1 ` ' �l R4 MULTI-FAMILY RES. - ./ IIT l�� , , , .1..1_,.. P: a ,• " till •. 1 i 1al •.�, �; .-til • • •. II .. B1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS 11 r1 ,��y • '! I " "�'•' n 92 COMMUNITY BUSINESS ate. .,St -117" ?• '• 1 't' • Iii , .N r r 83 CENTRAL BUSINESS _ ,�3! 1 attrit�•— �- _ ;(*1'•', * 1 �" Ml i ;� ,.-±-,-1".-- ... "-1 ,• 5tl J • i 11 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL •, C1 w ,�" - •• ,61 :_., ,.�' ..'•: '1. • 12 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL oar 19 ?...1., i •! " " '?''y.', • ;. 1' , 'J 113-1-L-.1-1 `�- �^; r J. l RIrERv7E�' '_�. 11 l. ►� C���1. •� �1�•, r \.i Y r- RTD RACETRACK DISTRICTw«N A` , lit 1 S i 4.r ••I! S SHORELAND 1 'i -• '� 1 T"' ` ` .a� ,3 t. j-. Ii FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT :., ...\\„...1.„, ■� 71 y `,L ;T1 �. `• - - MANDATORY RUDr♦i ! .di _S� �'� i �r'+ • 3 tli_ti....2...i L 4 . : 1.22-71 1,2_1_,-7 7 • Le_.• ' CCIRPECT11:1101. . 1 1 1 1 ' ---s,--4----7 , ___ . ¢Q - �"� son �!J .2_12j win ( R2i 1-71 o' T ut• 4. • , I 1� ID Euro I �1__ 1 f o , • t1 , I i • � / 4 ..7.: 17H-1. 1 1111U — Q liFiamill. a re i •1111V 1717 Mill I i tN H ELEMENTARY I IQaA tT. 1 ,• I Qaa1L'N ..-.j , 1 1 , �---' I, I 11 MM2 itiiaM , wM k • ! I • 1• i i »IH I . t-1 �f �� ;•� -�1 mCtE7tr --.� f 1 1 i 1 ` . i� `^-^ ' . 1 0 1, 1 1■ 1 f f al ©0 i«'1 1 Y 12n 1 1 1 =vr• 1 , FP I ,l I� I A1 1 a : l ' l l21H •j a 4 a 1a E. lAYi s O s •s e 0 s Ite I 2 - --- h-i.Q ,i �•• 1 6 a '� ' f11 I •I ,1 ' • agiii ! I Alin :1VIP , r? 14 1 ,, _ i • • ,as,: I "Tf w I .4--..- I !w• 4 •T�p„�`T a 1 a I ; } ' LZR6 PARC J 11!11 • 2•--F• ^' iY • -`�f� - i 1 I ' - ;MD :_�1 �—I,: `, .. c' O , i. 1 * \ . 1•j 1 1 _ • -,".--1 • �l W i ! NI :s;s�;•� 16. as1-a 1di d- `7. I ;J VDMDC DRIVE. t ' �• 1 -1111 TNfAIi - PMC i • .., v.• _•• suir ow ill•sul•HKt xll'4II°1°•°°01 \r)r....l•N .,•..1°y 4.-aidr..j OOCYlOS3NNII1 •33dO)IYHS uoiaa,•s• le•naa119a-v•.....1103 3Altlt] 9NI1a31A •auI•sa)olooasy 1106.0 .q uo.iaAoM...,...,,. .P.,1 ..._.I., ,.., dY11 AY* dO 11401UioOIU ualaJ0 Los /� , 35 -''.)x 3x11 1543-1 ~ :R ° SO'UIl — 0 N I 91'1111 A.9Z,f0.05 - ! �\ . li• StI / 0I ! • 3.9Z,f0.044 v • Y. 1 M /��I� ~` 111 \0 F+�1 i.: H it a M N� \c 't: •Sgu Q w .' I ;.. N \ = l0 � N i:, W g iYi•• :.:no • II I I I 1I N a \,. w N . il • .*:-...:.;:.. 's8 ,. 7- I o_'a - ••I I I I W \ W• I I I � a.. (�yT(/dl o i. • z :J •.f .Lr.2 N < 01 \ °-�.•a Z N V *•11` ,\b S 1 ua tr m 8:• i amp I•:: I I „N :e$ i:: ;; 1 o�'s ....4::: 5e .z -K N. I I o l4 "3 I n • •Ri nj o �� G.92 qt'11 ^' P.200.00 �. I a� I 112 3i i x °. 11, • :u 4t1/4 . li \ \ ::: '-::::, . . : '''..:1•1,4%,s,,\ I •., 0 ::: ill!iAlli..::"..• 1.a,Of.0 s / /'� •. 35 _••,3x 3x11 153.1—i % I \ •,'°' / \\2, S'.1*11 0 • � :t.::telZesl 1 � �M ' % Vni • Y /):,7 :11.1,..."i 'ivii1-1:1:1, 21 64.N.1:11...- ‘..— N -'s \'' lel1 I 05 \ ,9 of 1on 11 I T \ o ` =b 1 . `*' W= nI \ „, x :It tU 'I .;;:i t :2 Ji i� � ;r w> I > kr n 1 30 13a . TENTATIVE AGENDA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Adjourned Regular Meeting June 21, 1994 1 . Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M. 2 . Stans House - Contractor Selection Phase III 3 . Stans House - Disposition of Prcoerty 4 . Other Business a) b) 5 . Adjourn Dennis R. Kraft Executive Director MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items DATE: June 17, 1994 1 . Attached is correspondence from Tracy and Roger Menden regarding the public hearing for the community center. 2 . Attached is the Pool Policy on Closing for your information. 3 . Attached is a memorandum from the Chief of Police regarding speed limits on 1st Avenue. 4 . Attached are the May 26, 1994 minutes of the Board of Review. 5 . Attached is information regarding the 1994 Annual City Picnic. 6 . Attached are the May 2nd & 16th minutes of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 7 . The City has received a Notice of Petition and Order for Investigation in the matter of the proposed railroad crossbuck improvements, railroad advance warning sign improvements and pavement marking improvements for railroad-highway grade crossings on the Soo Line Railroad in the Twin Cities Metro Area. Of the $727, 000 estimated cost, 909,5 is eligible for federal reimbursement . The Soo Line and the State Highway Safety Account will pay the balance. A list of the crossings is on file with the City Clerk if anyone desires to review it . No crossings are within the City of Shakopee. 8 . Attached is the Police Newsletter for Council review. 9 . Attached is correspondence from the City Administrator to Mr. Jim Fox regarding the baseball program. 10 . Attached are the Revenue and Expenditure Reports as of May 31, 1994 . ,i1 r4zo_a_z__.,27 /e/Vi 4___Clai .47x022ehn -.--- k. ea-ria,;ce 4z, 9,:,,, /-1/- iLe,,'L. - ,i,a' ,.,7_. A,3-,cd,,,,y#' (7 „ i, 0GAG -",,---- ...�;✓✓ __4,-e.. _fie.),__'&, une,e a -iox?�'e4.2• — - --- — C awn .,; 4 , _ I . t) .../ 4„„ ._4,-__diy_y__4a_i4,&,,_ zei ALth___ ___atiy. y-hz4_, _ 1 ...(470,t/J,0 e,Je, 9Leakze . - _ anal, eri_w______ 2g-e.ze_4-7+___________ e c; _aii -ael4Varc»G47ry, 6'6'221924;>z4:•&eea (7/.47 qieadet,-411_4,_ 1 . 46;_/..act4_,44.ei , _911 a.c- ezQ e _& 2- i e 'mil.zie. Gv - - o�, N�y�'1.-�C^er.4cee 21 __G,�L'u�F 1�uj : .d ��--t_��u 'k C�' /'r ,d ,,a24.1..&27 - . & .3-.ice - a - /5 Auuet .p.a.?thatage , 439 r_z___o%, -447._azc__..z4v,e,e4.-lek_h__,,,ze.)___azz apx,„.a,), [& y6.,j , - ' 4.2 ,/doze -_ 2__ j ,.ikti_lt___e_zzra2i2h-v &A) iztie/,. . .v.434.2_ at_,Zeizeie,__,d-___‘t C;c•C;ee e..ze:„- r , . ,-fideay.__Ai4taita.tv_&2a ceee A'_e..a.&e.--147 42172az "z _dx,,,,,,,,____ . W_ 1 .-G nt, 4 .Q_- _ &7a4 da adJ [L__Ao . --erzyczza.e _ ____46_ed9:2(2,9v_ _X___it _e_47iwveene*. .Aa-49,2,.,-, _164e4i...& k J ?W.& _Ng?? — - .(2/2),m.,w1u,t -. .4.,42:411_44/) .2(.4:112,12e _,dcc. ncl�.» _.de7 n • - d'UDi-_JaL -112�� ,C,r3_ l(�7J �� G�11c37 fG? .c.e .42� ___l�C_-e � nc � O GGe 4y/zie?) ,l�J(�m7L�J QiyGc�J G% �[%Z e GCS-G G c} ,z6; .ae22me,JJL - dZG , 4 44 Q Aae ex-zy ex2tw2; „op. .4aolii.,./zrzet ion _d-e,,y2t)4E. jii,}4eze,/ _.- - Zsle2i ---- --- -' CLLJ a7.7247' ... Vic[�� Ctduzy _4;4._ 44.e. J e rl_ee-- Abic-2er2e1 2) 41,Aszi.zi" dee-dace-2;a/ t:(7 _ e'e(4) L 12��2t CcltE._ ---- - - -- -- - - iota ; 1 POOL POLICY ON CLOSING The pool will close if the air temperature is 65 degrees or below irregardless of the water temperature or the number of swimmers in the pool. Normal operation of the slide is Monday-Friday 12:00 - 5:00 and on weekends between 12:00-6:00 pm. Additional hours may be added at managers discretion. If during these hours, the number of users for the slide is slow, the waterslide will be shut down and ran every other half hour. If the pool closes for bad weather, it may reopen under these conditions: 1)If it rains at 12:00 pm, the pool can reopen if the bad weather stops. It will either open before 2:00 or after 4:00 pm. 2)If the weather turns bad anytime after 4:00 the pool will be closed for the evening. Exception: Swim lessons will still take place as dry land lessons. 43 TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Tom Steininger, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Speed Limits on 1st Avenue DATE: 06 09 94 INTRODUCTION: Information for Council - no action requested. BACKGROUND: Last October, Council approved lowering the speed limit on 1st Avenue to 30 MPH from Naumkeg Street to an unspecified point in the area of Murphy's Landing. The appropriate steps were taken to initiate this process with MNDOT. Following a speed zoning study, MNDOT advised us that they intended to raise the speed limit on 1st Avenue from 30 to 35 MPH rather than lower it as we had requested. Council was advised last month that this proposal was vigorously criticized and opposed. MNDOT has subsequently revisited the area and made the following modifications to their original position. 1. The speed zone on 1st Avenue between Scott Street and Marschall Road will be 30 MPH. This will be done by: a. Lowering the speed limit between Naumkeg Street and Marschall Road from 35 to 30 MPH, and b. Raising the speed limit from Scott Street to Rahr Malting will be raised from 30 to 35 MPH. 2 . The eastern boundary of the 35 MPH speed zone which now ends at Mill Pond Bridge will be moved eastward about 100 yards. 3 . New speed limit signs will be installed as follows: a. Existing 18 x 24 inch 30 MPH signs will be replaced with higher visibility 24 x 30 inch reflective signs. b. Existing 24 x 30 inch 35 MPH signs will be replaced with higher visibility reflective signs 36 x 48 inches or larger. c. Existing "Reduced Speed Ahead" signs will be replaced with larger "Reduced Speed Ahead" signs. 4 . Better lane markings will be applied to 1st Avenue in the area just east of the bypass. Although this response was not what we requested or hoped for, it is certainly a big improvement over their original plan. I believe this proposal is the probably best we can hope for at this time. y OL/ OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF REVIEW ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 26, 1994 Cncl. Lynch called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Steve Clay, Eldon Reinke and Richard Marks present. Councilor Sweeney was absent. Also present were: Robert Schmitt, Deputy County Assessor. Reinke/Clay moved to nominate Joan Lynch as Chairman. Clay/Marks moved that nominations be closed and Joan Lynch be elected chairman. Motion carried unanimously. Reinke/Clay moved to approve the Minutes of May 10, 1994. Motion carried unanimously. Reinke/Marks moved to concur with the assessor's reduced market value of $63,500 from $67,000 for parcel number 27-001840-0 owned by George Realander. Motion carried unanimously. Clay/Marks moved to concur with the assessor's reduced market value of $84,300 from $84, 600 for parcel number 27-034026-0 owned by Patricia Speath. Motion carried unanimously. Marks/Clay moved to concur with the assessor's reduced market value of $79,700 from $85, 200 for parcel number 27-002006-0 owned by Jonathan Crist. Motion carried unanimously. Marks/Reinke moved to concur with the assessor's market value of $130, 300 for parcel number 27-913017-0 owned by Donald & Barbara Booth. Mr. Reinke questioned whether the Public Health Department was ever contacted due to the caretaking of some homes in Shakopee. Mr. Schmitt stated that they have not come across any houses that are in that poor condition, but would contact the Public Health Department or the Building Inspector if such a house was found. Mr. Reinke commented on the Christmas in May program to fix up properties for the elderly, poor or disheveled homes in Shakopee. Motion carried unanimously. Marks/Reinke moved to concur with the assessor's reduced market value of $25, 200 to $27, 300 from $27, 000 to $29, 000 for Plat #032 owned by Condominium Units in the Plat of Macey's. Motion carried unanimously. Marks/Reinke moved to concur with the assessor's reduced market value of $75, 000 from $82 , 800 for parcel number 27-001724-0 owned by Gladys Slight. Motion carried unanimously. Official Proceedings of the May 26, 1994 Shakopee Board of Review Page -2- Clay/Marks moved to concur with the assessor's reduced market value of $89, 800 from $92,800 for parcel number 27-002015-0 owned by Belinda Rusch. Motion carried unanimously. Reinke/Marks moved to concur with the assessor's market value of $101, 300 for parcel number 27-024129-0 owned by Stanley & Diane Mach. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Schmitt commented that on the Eide property he found a error in the width of the house of approximately six feet. Clay/Marks moved to concur with the assessor's reduced market value of $82, 100 from $89, 100 for parcel number 27-004066-0 owned by Peter Eide. Motion carried unanimously. Marks/Clay moved to concur with the assessor's market value of $110, 600 for parcel number 27-908063-0 owned by Ron & Rosemary Schmitt. Motion carried unanimously. Marks/Reinke moved to concur with the assessor's market value of $52,900 for parcel number 27-001106-0 owned by Ron & Rosemary Schmitt. Motion carried with Mr. Clay opposing. Clay/Marks moved to concur with the assessor's reduced market value of $71, 000 from $74,500 for parcel number 27-001577-0 owned by Marvin Stier. Motion carried unanimously. Marks/Reinke moved to concur with the assessor's reduced market value of $101, 000 from $102,300 for parcel number 27-034050-0 owned by Stephen Schmitz. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Schmitt commented that in error the Hennes property was given an 8 percent increase instead of a 7 percent, therefore, a recommendation for a reduced value would be appropriate. Marks/Reinke moved to concur with the assessor's reduced market value of $105,400 from $106, 800 for parcel number 27-058005-0 owned by Richard Hennes. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Marks requested to have the City Inspector review the property of Melvin & Delores Lebens due to inadequate electrical systems, asbestos and lead paint. Marks/Reinke moved to concur with the assessor's reduced market value of $76, 300 from $88, 500 for parcel number 27-001453-0 owned by Melvin & Delores Lebens. Motion carried unanimously. Clay/Marks moved to send the original letter sent to the Shakopee Board of Review to the City Building Inspector for their review. Motion carried unanimously. Official Proceedings of the May 26, 1994 Shakopee Board of Review Page -3- Marks/Clay moved to concur with the assessor's reduced market value of $93 , 300 from $94 , 200 for parcel number 27-908056 owned by Sharon Fernholz . Motion carried unanimously. Reinke/Marks moved to concur with the assessor's reduced market value of $100, 100 from $104, 100 for parcel number 27-017051-0 owned by Sherman Thurmer. Motion carried unanimously. Clay/Marks moved to concur with the assessor's market value of $111, 800 for parcel number 27-131077-0 owned by Richard & Kaye Krebs. Motion carried unanimously. Marks/Clay moved to concur with the assessor's market value of $97 , 900 for parcel number 27-021031-0 owned by Randy Shubert. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Schmitt stated that in error the Knudson's were sent an assessment for the alleyway behind their home, therefore, this assessment should be $0. He explained the ownership of the alley and how it pertains to the property of the Knudsons and their neighbors. Marks/Reinke moved to concur with the assessor's market value of $0 for parcel number 27-001793-0 owned by Roger & Vicky Knudson. Motion carried unanimously. Marks/Reinke moved to concur with the assessor's market value of $32 , 000 for parcel number 27-001082-0 and 27-001083-0 owned by Parkside Printing. Motion carried unanimously. Marks/Reinke moved to concur with the assessor's market value of $73 , 100 for parcel number 27-102003-0 owned by Anne Topp Property. Motion carried unanimously. Reinke/Marks moved to concur with the assessor's market value of $127 , 200 for parcel number 27-001153-0 and 27-001155-0 owned by P & S Realty (Pullman Club) . Motion carried unanimously. Marks/Reinke moved to concur with the assessor's market value of $64 , 700 for parcel number 27-001206-0 owned by Hermon Harrison. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Schmitt stated that the Krueger property was listed as a four level split but after review it is only a three level. Marks/Reinke moved to concur with the assessor's reduced market value of $114 , 100 from $121, 400 for parcel number 27-021016-0 owned by Fred Krueger. Motion carried unanimously. There were no comments from the audience. Official Proceedings of the May 26, 1994 Shakopee Board of Review Page -4- There were no additional reviews received by the Assessor. Marks/Reinke moved to send the findings of the Board of Review to the County Auditor for Certification. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 7 : 46 p.m. Debra Zabel Recording Secretary 1 1 pps____ C1994 ANNUAL CITY PICNIC The Shakopee City Council invites you and your family to attend the City's Annual Picnic. This is the City Council's way of thanking Employees and Members on Boards and Commissions for their dedicated work during the past year. Kentucky Fried Chicken Buffet and beverages will be provided. Come join in the fun! )2, WHEN: Monday, August 15th WHERE: Lion's Park TIME: 4:30 p.m. - Visit with other participants q' 5:30 p.m. - KFC Buffet 6:30 p.m. - Enjoy the Municipal Pool and Waterslide*, or participate in games** Please RSVP (Yes or No) by August 11th to Tami or Toni @ 445-3650. * To prevent scratching of surface, no zippers, metal tabs, buttons, or jewelry are allowed on the Waterslide. ** Picnic kits will be provided by the Park & Recreation Department. 111N , K.) . t- ,{ ce, ), ! -,,„/AIP , r 4 ,' MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in regular session on May 2, 1994 at 4 : 30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Cook, O'Toole and Vierling. Also Liaison Sweeney, Joe Adams , Manager Van Hout and Secretary Menden. Motion by O'Toole, seconded by Cook that the minutes of the March 14, 1994 regular meeting be approved as kept . Motion carried. Motion by Vierling, seconded by Cook that the minutes of the April 4 , 1994 regular meeting be approved as kept . Motion carried. Commissioner O'Toole was absent. BILLS READ: . 0 0000 City of Shakopee 33 , 100 .00 ABM Equipment and Supply, Inc . 2 , 268 . 55 APPA ARA/Cory Refreshment Services, Inc. 104 .00294 . 00 Amsterdam Printing and Litho Corp. 144. 20 Auto Central Supply R.W. Beck and Associates 1 ,672 672 . 17 78 . Border States Industries , Inc . 59 Business Essentials , Inc . 184.02215 . 34 City of Shakopee 915 . 34 City of Shakopee 969 . 45 Classified Advertising Services Clay' s Printing Service 279 . 353 . 35 Communication Auditors 34,633 . 44 Cooperative Power 50 . 08 Copy Duplicating Products, Inc . 463. 90 Creative Copy 150 .00 DCA, Inc. . 00 Dickson Company 1 5400 .00 Evergreen Homeowners Association 63 Feed-Rite Controls, Inc . 57 .63 25 .00 Glenwood Inglewood 49 21 ,721. 49 Graybar Electric Co. , Inc . 396.03 Gopher State One-Call , Inc . 145 . 26 Hach Company Hennen' s ICO 33 . 755 133 .25 .88 4 Leef Bros . , Inc . Ray LeMieux 110 . 38 Locator and Monitor Sales 555 . 00 4 Minnesota Municipal Utilities Assoc . 102 . 00 Minnesota Safety Council Minnesota Valley Testing Laboratories, Inc . 136 .138 .00 Model Stone Company 46 . 13 19 Motor Parts Service Co. , Inc. 371, 545 . 13 Northern States Power Co. Northern States Power Co. 332 . 323 . 32 Parkside Printing Inc . 201 . 53 Petersen-Wisdorf, Inc . 4 . 62 Reynolds Welding Supply Co. 72 . 15 Ribbon Recyclers, Inc . 1 ,074. 96 Schoell and Madson, Inc. 8 . 0749 Schoell and Madson, Inc. 3 ,070 . 78 Scott County Treasurer . 08 1 ,048 Scott County Treasurer 442 . 1188 Shakopee Chevrolet Olds Pontiac Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 90 . 099 . 09 Southwest Suburban Publishing 933 . 63 Southwest Suburban Publishing 32 43 Starks Cleaning Services, Inc. 272 . 42 Star Tribune 149 .060 Dean Struck 51 .00 T & R Service 45,737 .00 Thane Hawkins Polar Chev122 . 55 Total Tool 39 . 71 Lou Van Hout 39 . 71 4 United Compucred Collections, Inc . 58 92 Waste Management-Savage 27 48 . 97 Wesco 3 .00 Gloria Olson 313. 00 Northern States Power Co. Motion by O'Toole, seconded by Vierling that the bills be allowed and ordered paid. Motion carried. Mr. Steve Beuning from Northern States Power Co . was present to give the Commission a check for $29 ,925 . 00 for their participation in the load curtailment program. Manager Van Hout informed the Commission of a claim that was turned over to the City Attorney for investigation. The claim appears to be without merit . A communication was acknowledged by Manager Van Hout regarding flushing. Gloria Vierling reported on a meeting with Rep. D. Minge attended by herself and Manager Van Hout . Commissioner Cook inquired about getting the lights fixed at the tennis courts at the Junior High. Liaison Sweeney gave his report on recent Council actions . He informed the Commission that the bids for the downtown under- grounding were rejected for being too high. They are looking to rebid the project . Mr. Sweeney also reported on the proposed annexation for the P and V Addition. Ken Adolf , Schoell and Madson was present to give the draft copy of the Feasibility Report for St .Francis Medical Center Water Improvements . A lengthly conversation followed on locations and costs involved. Motion by Vierling, seconded by O'Toole that the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission approve the concept plan for the pipe layout as presented in the Schoell and Madson feasibility study dated 4/29/94 as subject to the "Standard Policies in the Design Criteria and Standard Charges" . Motion carried. A history of the water connection fees were given to the Commission. The issue of whether to charge and how to administer the $ . 03 per square foot charge was discussed. Motion by Vierling, seconded by O'Toole to offer Resolution #421 A Resolution Setting Water Connection Charges . Ayes: Commissioners Vierling, O'Toole and Cook. Nayes : none. Resolution passed. Motion carried. A pay request to Richard Knutson Co. in the amount of $26 ,774. 33 was approved pending reviewal by staff . A report on the blending of certain wells and the test results were given by Art Young. It was recommended that we continue to test for 30 days and go to blending if necessary. Mr. Jerry Becker, a representative from Calvary Methodist Church was present for the discussion on water and electric service to the new church site on Vierling Drive. Mr. Darrel Gonyea, Gonyea Land Company was present for a discussion on Westridge Lake Estates PUD. Mr. Gonyea questioned the difference between an estimate made in October and the billing of recent . The need for a three phase line into his addition and the costs involved were also discussed. The consensus of the Commission was to stand by the October estimate plus additional charges for construction staking and similar administrative costs , but also with credits allowed for salvageable material. The 1993 audit was given to the Commission. They will review the audit before Mr. Streefland of Jaspers , Streefland Co. will come for a presentation. The consensus of the Commission was to release the audit to Mr. Voxland, City Treasurer, prior to formal approval . The 1994-1998 capital improvement plan will be presented at a latter meeting. The bid award for trencher and the bid award for the trailer will be deferred to an adjourned session. Motion by Vierling, seconded by O'Toole that the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission participate in a 50/50 cost share with the City of Shakopee for the Public Works/SPUC parking lot provided that the comments by Shakopee Utilities staff are incorporated in final drawings . Any corrections SPUC has to make to incorporate the provisions requested will be deducted from the 50/50 cost share. Motion carried. Manager Van Hout met with City Staff regarding the street lighting issue. They are now working on a long term plan. The City Engineer will be advising the developer to petition for the specific projects in Valley Green Industrial Park. A memo from Gregg Voxland regarding storm drainage billing was discussed. Liaison Sweeney informed the Commission that City Council would like us to take over the storm sewer billing for the City of Shakopee. Costs are being investigated and software changes will be looked into. It was the consensus of the Commission to send to the American Public Power Association $234 . 48 for nationwide EMF research. An intervention by the Minnesota Municipal Power Association in an electric transmission case was brought to the attention of the Commission. Motion by Vierling, seconded by O'Toole to offer Resolution #420 A Resolution Adjusting the Fees Under the Trunk Water Policy. Ayes: Commissioners O'Toole, Vierling and Cook. Nayes: none. Motion carried. Resolution passed. A recent request for increased life insurance for two SPUC employees was updated. Manager Van Hout gave copies of his completed contract to the Commission. This item was tabled until the June meeting. Upcoming meetings dates with various power associations were given to the Commission. A proposed adjustment to the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission labor and equipment billing rates was given by Joe Adams . The suggested new hourly rate is $35 . 00 per hour. Motion by O'Toole, seconded by Vierling that the Shakopee Public Utilities adopt the new labor and equipment rates as noted in memo of 4/27/94 . Motion carried. Rotas are as follows: Labor $35 . 00/hr Digger Derrick Truck $45 . 00/hr Bucket Trucks $35. 00/hr Small Truck $10 .00/hr Ditch Witch $40 . 00/hr Bob Cat $35 . 00/hr A discussion on the water for Homestead Ridge. Commissioner Vierling left her Commissioner chair to go to audience to speak on related water items for Homestead Ridge. Motion by Cook, seconded by O'Toole that the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission approve water to Homestead Ridge plat with the stipulation that we get a committment from the owner that there will be some future water service getting to the Southwest corner of the plat . Motion carried. Commissioner Vierling abstained. There were no lost time accidents for April , 1994. The next regular meeting of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission will be held on June 6th, 1994 in the Utilities meeting room. Motion by Vierling, seconded by O'Toole to adjourn to May 16, 1994 in adjourned regular session. Motion carried. \ba,Np, Barbara Menden, ommission Secretary MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (Adjourned Regular Meeting) The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in adjourned regular session on May 16 , 1994 at 4 : 30 P .M. in the Utilities meeting room. MEMBERS PRESENT : Commissioners Cook, Vierling and O' Toole. Also Joe Adams , Marvin Athmann, Manager Van Hout and Secretary Menden . Bids were received for a Trencher and Trailer on April 29 , 1994 . Mr. John McGowan, Trenchers Plus was present to give his input on the bids and the bid award. Motion by Vierling, seconded by O' Toole to award the low bid for the trencher and trailer to Ditch Witch of Minn in the amount of $56 , 145 . 00 . Motion carried . Mr. Jim Streefland, Jaspers , Streefland and Co . was present to give the presentation on the 1993 audit . A discussion followed. Motion by O' Toole , seconded by Vierling to accept the 1993 audit . Motion carried. Motion by O' Toole, seconded by Vierling that staff work with the auditors on the quarterly report that would indicate the status of restricted funds and operating funds and bond funds . Motion carried. Motion by Vierling, seconded by Cook that a process be developed which indicates which funds are appropriate to transfer monies out of and how repayment is made. Motion carried. Motion by O' Toole, seconded by Vierling that Greg Voxland, City Treasurer supply the Commission with a quarterly report of the Shakopee Public utilities Commission investment activities . Motion carried . The capital Improvement Plan for 1994 + Electric and Water was presented by Manager Van Hout . A lengthly discussion followed. A communication from Dennis Kraft regarding the proposed annexation of Jackson Township was given to the Commission . The proposed installation of water installation was discussed. A review of the recent events for the Downtown Electric Undergrounding was given to the Commission by Manager Van Hout . A review of the intent of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission construction plan for parts of the downtown undergrounding was also given by Manager Van Hout . SbcuJUa ( , Barbara Menden : Co• i sion Secretary BEFORE THE MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION REGULATION BOARD Richard Helgeson Chairman Lyle G. Mehrkens Board Member Lorraine E. Mayasich Board Member IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED RAIL- FILE NO. D-5855 ROAD CROSSBUCK IMPROVEMENTS, RAIL- ROAD ADVANCE WARNING SIGN IMPROVE- ORDER NO. R-4335 MENTS AND PAVEMENT MARKING IMPROVE- MENTS FOR RAILROAD-HIGHWAY GRADE CROSSINGS ON THE SOO LINE RAILROAD IN THE TWIN CITIES METRO AREA ORDER ISSUED: _Ijuis,141_119 NOTICE OF PETITION AND ORDER FOR INVESTIGATION Notice is hereby given by the Transportation Regulation Board that the State of Minnesota Department of Transportation seeks an investigation for the necessity of allocating public funds from the State Highway Safety Devices Appropriation to improve railroad-highway grade crossing signs and pavement markings on the Soo Line Railroad in the Twin Cities Metro Area. Based upon said petition, the original of which has been filed with the Board, the Board hereby orders: ORDER 1. That an investigation be undertaken pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Sections 174A.02, sub. 1, 219.24 and 219.40. 2. All persons or potential parties may file an original and two copies of a Petition to Intervene no later than July 1, 1994, with the Transportation Regulation Board, 254 Livestock Exchange Building, 100 Stockyards Road, South St. Paul, Minnesota 55075. The Petition to Intervene shall state with specificity the purpose for intervention, specific objections to the Statement of Need and Petition for Hearing and Investigation and shall state whether a hearing on the objection is requested. Upon review of the Petitions to Intervene submitted to the Transportation Regulation Board, the board may issue a final order or issue a final order exempting any material issue of fact or objection for future hearing and set the matter or a portion of the matter over for contested case hearing pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 14. 3. The Department of Transportation shall cause a copy of this order and its petition to be served upon all persons or potential parties known to have an interest in this proceeding and file an affidavit of review with the Board. 4. The above notice shall be published for a 30 day period in the Board's Weekly Calendar. BY O' 'ER OF THE BOARD / Richard Helges.• Chairman SERVICE DATE: JUN . .C1- ( SEAL ) -2 - MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION REGULATION BOARD STATE OF MINNESOTA In the Matter of Proposed Railroad STATEMENT OF NEED Crossbuck Improvements, Railroad AND PETITION FOR Advance Warning Sign Improvements INVESTIGATION and Pavement Marking Improvements HEARING & ORDER for Railroad-Highway Grade Crossings on the Soo Line Railroad in the Twin Cities Metro Area D-D-5855855 The Commissioner of Transportation, having determined that there is a need for improved warning devices at railroad-highway grade crossings on the Soo Line Railroad lines in the Twin Cities Metro Area, for its Statement of Need and Petition for Investigation, Hearing and Order states as follows: STATEMENT OF FACTS AND NEED 1. Minnesota Statute, Section 219.17-219.26 authorizes the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) to adopt rules and to review the adequacy of warning devices at highway grade crossings. See also Minn. R. 8830.0700, et. seq. 2. Mn/DOT is charged with the maintenance of the State Trunk Highway System and is a road authority for purposes of Minnesota Statute, Sections 219.19 and 219.20 (1989). 3. As a road authority, Mn/DOT is charged with the installation and maintenance of certain warning devices at railroad-railroad grade crossings on the State Trunk Highway System. 4. On all other road systems located in Minnesota, the local road authority is charged with the installation and maintenance of advance warning signs and markings at railroad-highway grade crossings. 5. All other railroad-highway grade crossing warning signs and devices are the responsibility of the individual railroad companies. Minnesota Statute, Sections 219.17-219.26 and Minn. R. 8830.0700, et. seq. 6. Seventy seven percent of all railroad-highway grade crossings in Minnesota are protected with passive warning signs. 7. Seventy two percent of all railroad-highway grade crossings in Minnesota are located in rural areas of the state. 8. Between 1973 and 1982 Mn/DOT reviewed 5,318 railroad-highway grade crossings and installed or improved advance warning devices at 2,884 crossings. 9. Between 1973 and 1982 grade crossing accidents were reduced by 50 percent and grade crossing fatalities were likewise reduced. 10. Despite improvements in railroad-highway grade crossings, there were 654 accidents at railroad-highway grade crossings in Minnesota between 1986 and 1990. These accidents resulted in an economic loss of more than $75 million. 11. The public railroad-highway grade crossings along the Soo Line corridors in the Twin Cities Metro Area (Exhibit A) are located on both trunk highways and roadways under the jurisdiction of local units of government. 12. Between 1989 and 1993 there were 108 accidents at railroad-highway grade crossings along the Soo Line corridor (Exhibit A). These accidents resulted in a total estimated economic loss of$12.6 million. -2 - 13. In 1988 and 1989 Mn/DOT held 14 safety forums throughout the State of Minnesota on transportation safety issues. A recurring theme at each of the forums wast e public's demand for a stronger state program to enhance safety at railroad-highway grade crossings. 14. The Commissioner's investigation revealed that drivers seldom encounter trains traveling over railroad-highway grade crossings and, consequently, drivers tend to become inattentive and complacent at grade crossings. Drivers' inattentiveness is a primary cause of accidents at grade crossings. 15. The Commissioner's investigation also revealed that older drivers often have difficulty seeing road markings and signing for railroad-highway grade crossings. Failure to see warning devices is a cause of accidents at railroad-highway grade crossings. 16. The Commissioner has concluded that the number of accidents which occur at railroad-highway grade crossings would be substantially reduced if the visibility and awareness of railroad-highway grade crossings was improved by installing upgraded warning devices consistent with the requirements of Minnesota Statute, Section 219.17-219.26 and Minn. R. 8830.0700, et. seq. 17. The Commissioner has determined that the visibility and awareness of railroad-highway grade crossings will be substantially increased by the installation of crossbucks which have been reflectorized on both the front and the back. 18. The Commissioner has determined that the visibility and awareness of railroad grade crossings will be substantially increased by the installation of reflectorized advance warning signs and other appropriate reflectorized warning signs displayed in advance of the railroad-highway grade crossings. 19. The Commissioner has determined that serious injury and fatalities at railroad-highway grade crossings will be substantially reduced by the use of crossbucks and -3 - signposts'supports which meet the breakaway criteria of Section 7 of the 1985 AASHTO Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs. Luminaries and Traffic Signals. 20. The Commissioner has determined that the visibility and awareness of railroad-highway grade crossings will be substantially increased by the use of durable retroreflective preformed patterned pavement marking tape at all signalized hard surface railroad-highway grade crossings where vehicle approach speeds are 40 miles per hour or greater. 21. Wide-angle prismatic retroreflective sign sheeting material was designed to increase the brightness of highway signs and increase their angle of visibility. The material is designed to create a strobe effect when a car approaches a crossing while a train is traveling over the crossing. 22. Mn/DOT has tested the effectiveness of the wide-angle prismatic retroreflective sign sheeting material and pavement tape on 20 experimental projects between 1985 and 1990 and found that the retroreflective pavement tape adheres to pavement under normal conditions at all locations other than areas subject to high turning movements. 23. Wide-angle prismatic retroreflective sign sheeting material and pavement tape is a "state of the art" material currently being manufactured by only one company in the country. 24. The Commissioner has determined that use of wide-angle, prismatic retroreflective sheeting on crossbuck signs, the reflective strip on the crossbuck posts, track number signs, stop signs, appropriate advance warning signs and durable retroreflective preformed patterned pavement marking tape will substantially increase the driver's awareness of the railroad-highway grade crossing. -4 - 25. The Federal Highway Administration has approved a finding that it is in blic's best interest to use proprietary material at public railroad-highway r da d rade e the pu and death g crossings to substantially reduce the risk of accident, personal in]urY crossings. 26. Mn/DOT has reviewed and evaluated all public railroad-highway grade crosthe sings on the Soo Line lines in the Twin Cities Metro Area, and has determinedthat t the risk of accident, personal injury, and death would be substantially reduced byte installation of the warning devices identified in paragraphs 17 through 24 of this petition. 27. The total estimated cost to furnish and install the breakaway retroreflecti e in bucks at all public railroad-highway grade crossings listed in Exhibit B on the Soo L cross corridor is $127,899.00 (Exhibit D). 28. The total estimated cost to furnish and install the aforementioned advance warnin signs, supplemental advance warning signs and other identified signs and pavement g � markings on the Soo Line corridor is $599,259.50 (Exhibit D). 29. The State of Minnesota, pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Section 161.36 (1989) is authorized to cooperate with the United States' government in contracting for the em construction and improvement of roads and bridges not included in the truck highway system which are financed in whole or in part by federal monies. 30. Ninety percent of the cost of the installation of new crossbuck signs, uck osts, the reflective strip on the crossbuck posts, track number signs, stop signs, crossb p appropriate advance warning signs and durable retroreflective preformed patterned appro p pavement marking tape are eligible for federal reimbursement. -5 - PETITION WHEREFORE the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of e ortation respectfully requests that the Transportation Regulation Board order e Trans p following: I. That new crossbuck signs, crossbuck posts, the reflective strip on the crossbuck posts, track number signs, stop signs, appropriate advance warning signs and at all durable retroreflective preformed patterned pavement marking tape shall be installed public railroad-highway grade crossings on the Soo Line lines in the Twin Cities MetroArea, as identified in Exhibit B and Exhibit C. II. That Mn/DOT is ordered to proceed with their plans to contract the installation of crossbucks, advance warning signs, and/or pavement markings to beinstalled stalled at the above referenced railroad-highway grade crossings. III. That the crossbuck signs, the reflective strip on the crossbuck posts, track ber signs, stop signs and appropriate advance warning signs installed under this Or a r num sig use wide-angle prismatic retroreflective sign sheeting material. IV. That the pavement markings installed under this Order use durable retroreflective preformed patterned tape, except that this material shall not be used in areas subject to high turn movements or roadways subject to repaving as identified in J V. That the cost of the installation of the new warning devices shall be allocated as follows: 90 percent or approximately $654,442.65 of the cost of the aforementioned warning devices shall be paid with federal funds; -6 - 10 percent or approdmately $12,789.90 of the cost ofon crossbuck signs, crossbuck posts, the reflective strip signs the crossbuck pose g track number signs and stop shall be paid by the Soo Line; and �5 95 of the advance 10 percent or approximately $59,9_warningsigns , other supplemental advance warning signsgaid for from the State and pavement markings shall be p Highway Safety Account. for the continued maintenance and e VI. That the Soo Line shall be responsible osts, the reflective strip on th o crossbuck p signs. The Company shall maintain these signs replacement of the newly installed crossbuckosigns,P and stop crossbuck pose track number signs to the standards contained in this Order. VII. That the rethe continued s ective road authorities shall be responsible for nd pavement p o signs, other warning signs maintenance and replacement of advance warning b ' 'es shall maintain the signs to the standards contame d m��ngs. The respective road authorities in this Order. VIII. That the warning devices to be installed on all public railroad-highway grade crossbit B and Exhibit C have been approved by the Transportation for crossings identified in Exhibit Regulation Board and are deemed adequate 402 and appropriate protection the crossings pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Section c oti EUGENE E. OPSTEAD Date: Assistant Commissioner Transportation Research & Investment Management Division Minnesota Department of Transportation -7 - SH1A1Ko1EE June 16 , 1994 Mr. Jim Fox 1204 Tumble Weed Circle Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mr. Fox: Earlier today I received your correspondence regarding your son' s being banned from participating in the summer baseball program. I have discussed this item with both the Shakopee Community Services Director and the Recreation Supervisor. It is my understanding that your son has not been banned from the program. The fact of the matter seems to be that your son' s registration for this activity was received after the deadline date . I am also aware of your position with respect to this issue. Your failure to provide requested documentation (copy of bank statement) which would have provided proof and evidence that you in fact registered prior to the registration deadline would have been helpful in resolving this problem. The City of Shakopee merely acts as a conduit for the Shakopee Baseball Association in receiving registrations. It is my understanding that representatives from the Baseball Association are supportive of Shakopee City Staff' s position with respect to your son' s registration. The Shakopee Baseball Association and the City of Shakopee share your concern with providing access to all recreation programs . The policies and procedures in place have been in existance for a number of years . If you have suggestions to improve this process, we would certainly appreciate to hear them. I will agree that it is unfortunate that we do not have adequate playing fields and/or volunteers to provide more services to our youth. I would strongly encourace you to become active in the Shakopee Baseball Association to help remedy any problems that you may have solutions for. Sir•cerely�, /6" Dennis R. Kraft City Administrator DRK:trw CC: Barry Stock, Comm. Services Dir. Mark McQuillan, Rec . Supervisor Charlie Fonder, Shakopee Baseball Assoc . Gary Hartman, Shakopee Baseball Assoc . CONIMUNM PRIDE SINCE 1b�- NO O O M I` C t` CO1O O O O I` r4 O O O O V' O O C' N N 111 O •O O CO rl 10 U1 '4 0 O O U1 CO d' ,-i Sr V) � ri � N M O O O \O O1 O O O O .-i O O N . E.Z A O N O Ul rl M .-1 \O rl O V' ri U1 Ul O O o O m O O 10 o Ul d' 000 0 ,Q' ricr00 W ? M M �' M m M r1 CO C M M ,.i r4 C 43 W U a 43 a Q\ U1 0 0 o rl Ul ar 0 0 0 0 0 sr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m 0 0 0 II O 0 U1 Ul O O O O U1 O O U1 N r1 M o II O O m CO N N O O O m ri r 10 O O O O co . 11 O O U1 O 11 N O N �' C' rl O Ul O O O r N O O N M r O O O O r O O m M M Cr M II m 0 NO d• m C' m U1 O• O O Ul r UI O I` O\ N d' �' O O U1 O O M 0 W II m 0 O 01 OD N 01 N MC)U1 O m d' d' ri 01 m m m 0 a' 0 0 O1 IN o r'1 ,-1 .] U 11 M CO N M C' co T• ri O1 O N m rl O co O1 N a' 0 OD m UN m E. rt rl U1 O1 rl U1 1 1 ri 1 74 II N O1 N N U1 V1 1 U1 co I U1 M d' QN i 1 N rl C i i t� I W O II d m I I I 0 E. I-1 11 . I V} A U 0: II N N VD A Q. a llI I m > 11 VT I 11 11 it 11 O O in 0 ri N O O O 01 U1 10 0 O 0 O O VO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 ri r1 N N o 0 o rl m N er O O O O ri 0 0 0 0 U1 0 0 U1 N O1 M O O O is N U1 m 0 U1 O V' O1 N V' O O U1 N N 0 0 0 O N 0 O N O1 01 In O M M .-1 U1 N .r O1 O1 O1 VI N Ul O N O N d' a' VD NO d' M . a w O1 01 ri N O1 VI er 01 U) Ul .-I O ri N Ul U1 N 01 VD ri A p Z 0 O C O M N • N N O ri r-I 01 N m NH M U1 U1 V' E. E CO N N r-1N h 1-1 N t? • U 9 VT 1-A >+ QW v) O O N N ri 0 0 0 0 o O U1 0 0 O O O 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O N O OO O U10 m Tr 0 0 CD d' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N 0 0 0 O O N N U1 0 o U1 O m 10 m C 0 0 O O CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 01 U1 O1 O M M ri N ri 61 N O CO 01 Ul 01 Ul M N V} O1 CO M l0 E. Ul Ul r1 M rl in N m N M O Ul rl M N CO W E a• l0 10 O ri Tr N ri N M ri N W Ea aZA in. r'' N TT ri aarn a0E' C) a -1\ U 2E < ,2 W M xa� U1 in 43 0 U. A O tt) 0y' > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U N O O N O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 m o o CO O O O O O 0 O O O O 0 O O O Vr d' 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 O O U1 O 0 W CO 0 0 m O O O m 10 O O 0 (n N U) U1 M N co m OD 0 0 0 0 V' El 'a M co Ul 10 Ul O Ul Ul 0 Ul N N N C CO 01 N Ul O CD O1 O 0 M N ,7„ N rl N ri N U) M rl N C' 411 d• O co 0 V' Z 43 '' M COri M rl VI r4 m cn H > v L} E. W N N w a eh w E. W z a W Z W W > Cl)Up a a cn W 0) E E. m co .7 U E. HEX f 2E Kt E. a m � F � UW A Wa E. W Cl)W E. X U) X Fi Cl) z0 EE co •-i a C7 - Z U E. Z E. I-4 I-1 C IX CD '� z 4 a Cl) Cl) Cl) Kt 2 Cl. ~ FF4cUn UA1ffwWf C Z Xj OM ..] X Kt x z W I-+ cn C C a a W W 1-i V1 U) Z E. Q Kt UW U) ) Cl) 43W EEZ W Cl) 434-1 I I 0 EU a a E- cn4 ZUZ Zaaaacnrt43M W f Q SO C7 Q E. r+ w .i E. cn etI-iw WI+ KC Kt >•13a2 Z oFAAUl 0Z C 2 > A Cl) C .) UECOCDCDUUco OW Cl) F4 E. w cn :cc4 C.) 41 XCl. ri . ZZ '-4 '- ...3 UC...) F4F4Q E. g U 0 C .7 Z C 4 CO CO ri r- Z 0: W E I- I'i 41 43 CD Z M U O to Cl) wit , EWO z Ac F ( Cl] .7 .a UWWW Z Cl) A aUCD 0OCtU ..] € 7CUQ43 W .s .. .- E� c. Zw W rl Ocn0 a 043 CD co -+ :.1U4333aO a ,tUa 1-J < < r.5 4 o4 .1CO CD ago a a .-lti11-' .i0 .7wa W 43E0 ,x CD KC E- 0acna U0 aU. 4 O U « cO02E na2E43cOolcO0 E+O Cl) C1 O C' O E N O ,-i M 01 O r-I N M C U1 O 0 E. ri N MCO m 1-4 r4O C l0 N m h ^� O O CI rl N N N N C' d' d' Q' d' 10 Cl d' d' d• a' e' Ul UJ CO O O O O 0] r� r.l ri ,-1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N 'J M rn M M M M M a d Tr Tr 0 Cl. M M M CO M M M M M M M M M M M M M UI m M m M M M M Cl) M M M M /,: 0 0 0 0 0 e• Cs. l0 N O 0 W O CA 0 0) O CO O O VD OD r- o 0 N I N N 0 N r1 01 M N II O O O O r l ri M N O O N er O O 01 r I U) O CA C) ri l0 0 O I 0)er 1- N c' O N O N H • F A u C' Z W II 0000 0 N M M o rl M e' 0) O 01 O e' O CD er O ri O OI O N N rl O U) O ri 01 W > n ri N N M C) e' e' M on e' M N e' cr M M N l0 rl N l0 r6 () H n ri ri H CL a W u ) U Cu W II CC u II 10 0 0 0 0 0 M CO o 0 M 0 l0 U) O O O O U) O U) O O O r, O O .--1 0 0 0 r, 0 I O C) Cl 0 0 0 ri V. 0 0 0 0 c' N O O O O U) U1 C 0 0 0 O N N N O O O N 0 I O O O N N l0 O U) 0 U) OD O M l0 N O N O ri C) ri U) O M N l0 l0 l0 O O U) ri e. I U) O r. 01 CO 1/40 Cs V) O N Cs 01 r- N O CO C O N U) W O O C1 0) l0 l0 O O O ri N CO O I .•-1 C) l0 l0 M CO U1 l0 U) N ri M N c' e' 0) U) N 0 ri U) U1 e' N M M M N 0 0) e' O M FWI . _ _ _ _ I ,-) U I O M N r I N ri ri e' U1 l0 0) Ul ri N M O ri M N 01 O 0 U) O N Cs l0 0) F !^^, 1 ri H m N i r1 i H i .-1 N M rl I I 0) er e' i l0 I I N O W a I I H M I I C� F H u I I lD 1 1 r Cl U I4 I I 4 4 I cr} CQ > u 1 I u II II O o 0 0 0 0 M CO o 0 N O e' U) 0 0 0 0 Ul O U) 0 0 0 C1 O O 01 0 0 0 01 0 II O o N 0 0 0 rl e' 0 0 C) O U) N 0 0 0 0 e' U) U) 0 0 0 0) M M I- 0 0 0 N O II O 0 0 N OD 1/40 O U1 O U1 rl O l0 l0 N 0 03 0 CO O CO U) O M N m m M O O U) OD 0 II Ul N 01 rl l0 is l0 I- N rl N N 0• N U) rl M ri N 0) .i M M O) U) N l0 O • .-1 W II ri l0 lO l0 0 U) l0 N COrl N er U) c' O 0 O N co 10 l0 N e' co U) O A4u _ - - _ • Z 11 M rI M N M N N M H .--1 U) 01 V. e' r-1 H N U) C) C1 VP LO co tin F V ?U ri '-1 m 0 . N ri N -t .-1 l ri . l0 •N. 4 w ) n v> ri C4 u s� . u I n u n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 l0 U) O O O O 0 O U) O 0 O 01 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O H O O sr O O O O O O O e' o OO N 0 0 0 0 an 0 U) 0 0 0 l0 Ul U) 0 0 0 0 O 0 H 0 0 N l0 OD ri 0 0 0 O N U) M ri 0) O O O N O OD O O Cs U) N N N O O O N O H l0 M C) O W U) r♦ OO N In M O O N ri M ri C1 ri rl M l0 Cl O F n c' M l0 ri N O N 01 er e. l0 U) N 4l0 ri U) 0) 0) N U) r- 0 - Z S 4 u WELI z) [ F v fY Z KC II M ri VD VD N ri N N 1-I M U) U) 00 .I 01M 00) = OH '-I CV Ch- LTM •CC -4 U £U4 v> W M -c: as-, u) u) w o CE. WO ›.. > II O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F W C/: II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H a 4 11 . • U Il 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 O 0 CD CD 0 0 0 CD V. 11 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co o 0 0 e' CI O m 0 ri O 0 0 0 U) er 0) OD A II 0 O N O O U) Ul O U) O O O O N 0 H l0 U) Tr N O 0 O O M N U) m WWH _ _ F a u 0 U) ri ri N N U) N l0 l0 0 O 4-1 l0 er O N M U) O O O O CO OD l0 e' Z II .-4 M ri O ri ri N ri ri M e' ri [` l0 l0 N lD C1 'N H j h M U) ri iR N FW a ,..i LO c4 n V) W u 1 II u H F E• z Q�0 °' - A II c< c4 N GL u) u 4 W F 5 W I W U) W C)) Z Cs) I-. U H w Z a w co Z 0 w > Cl) F F :s. W I-I-I F U 044 zxWNGco aaao A Cl) COCnCn w41Z w a1 WCE, 4cn :. Li) aW4 Otna0WW WWO W E. ad Z 1 > W Cd O W cC CO Cn H Z W I-i H U. C1;. H 0 W W O ; 4) > ZZCU) `b � a4. CD W ZFOCDW FF F OW W C, co. Cl) Z £ O •-. z :r. H -: •s F 4 :E F .^ i-+ > Uv) a .CxUCD0ceCIZcn '•-' >> coZz W co [X ,n 0. I CL Cn Cn C H W > OC HH Z Z 4 a 0 CR £ W H 0. Z W W C W 0 0 .7 4. i-+ I OzH W > Z < 00 .7HH ._ 0u) .-, £ 0FF0000 C; O v) E.F I. ...1 " 4 I w > u) CC H k. £ 3 COC CC U U 4 £ H I-+ U U H I•, H W C W U 1 W SH W U. W :D r4 W W A3 .244u) cncnEx < ' Z E. CO cUn x w u Q A 41i 0A >CE] CC L) CL w w W CO OD 4v) CO Cn CO 41 H .: CO H H w rs zZCOCn xFWW WW 0 w w UwFN £ Cl) A II Wa .-a AHwz340FI -Ial.a .•7 .a ..7F .-7U 1 , w Z na £ 4WA40mCnOOWEI. 0000aazzzx a u WO O ►iO4Zai ZZ W w0000OAOOOF 4 Z 4 c- Fzz a d F n cduaact. a. > u) �, £ Wwc4aaaan. >+ 4Uzz0 0F G. E. £ '- U F F U II W II 0) 0 ri O ri V. U) O N M U) l0 0 N O .1 N M Cs CO 0) r1 0) O P.) II O rl ri N N N N M M M M M U) U) r C` I` I` I` r- r CO CO C) p O 0) N N N N CO N CI a waerca 'Er a' ez' av' wa' acerwe' awwet' awc a u) CD to to to vo O n M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Cl') m Cl) M M M M a rn Cn M n m H H 0 Wo a n ON II 1,1 II 0 m F 0 it • II F 0 II • Cn co > II .-1-1 II ti v Z > II o .o b U 1-I II H mCP W > H .-1a a W II . U1-1 11 WU II cd (1.1 H a. W H W U II CC II a W II It a It II I .-1 II II 0 0 I .-I II 11 0 0 I • II II • I V II II 0 C 1 N II I1 In m 0 I N II O H N Io F W 1 . II .] U 1 rn n F aU n a; - FQZ I o II F Q z II o .-1 W O 4 1 eP H 03 C� F. I-I I - H o ur s II r N Oi) I inI ii H CO• Q 4 11 CO 1> n 00 11 CO > 11 H II II II II II It II II H H ON n 1 0 0 II CO II 1 0 0 II • II 1 . H r1 H I 0 0 11 is II 1 0 • 4 (a) II N n O• Q w 1 0 0 j 2 m m � It • 7 � I to F• F. to II N II FF W 1 .o • U > H m II • U > I rl w Q W II to H >. 4W I co a H n: 1 n 1 tt 1 n 1 11 I H N I1 0 0 11 N It O 0 II • 11 H 0 II 0 o II N II o E. n m H H O ZX .] it - n Zx ' - w wFQ H r1 H W w F 4 Q rl W H w a Z O II N 11 w F w a Z 0 m a a 0 a o F n N H aao` WOE v) 00',. 0E0 n to II Xa�1 UIQ W � U Q n XW rl ... a\ II aa n In u cn in0 H W o 11 W o H w H O n ozw OW0 �. >0 no I >. > 0 043 CO 11 E. (2.1 o) 0 o 1H•1 a Q H 0 1 t-iUo aQ U H I.0 1 U n 01 1 in m Q II Cl* 1 O N tO W W II - I ww - - Hp H r• + I E.• 7 0 m II m I o Il W II N u W t•-• Cl 1-I > II - II r > v> E 11 Wo II H W -. W v) a HU) II U) a w H W n 1 n I 11 II I 11 I n I It I H I 0 H I CuII H 1 a I1 1 N II 1 J II 1 0 II I w II I II I 4 n 1 11 I F It a a u F I Q z n 0 1 U r Z II F Z 1 O H O I CO 1-. 11 0 H 1 O 0 a F it H 1 a w o, n n a I A CL ri H W 1-4 1 co u 0 1 m (Xn a . to 1 b. En W H O 1 z in F 0 n 2 Ia aF••1 n W 1 m E0•. W n 0 1-3 II Z CO u rn D co D CO n 0 O n m (l) II kr kr, m m trl II tfl UN 1/1 F A II N N z W u b D ) > n . � v v .-. 1 -1 V H n n, a W u W U u a CO It a u u u m en .4 .•1 II .-1 .-1 r, rn II II .-1 .ti N N II tO NO NO tO o II CO CO ON ON F W 11 .. a u It F Q z n o o m a W I N N i A U F IX I 0 N CO > , II 1 N N m m CO CO tp to CD CO h N A• Q W kb � rn &I F• N Z r) r1 a N.0 N IX o 0 ..I .•I o 0 NO l0 o o a a F N U ul zxa m m wFv aza o. am a0F oo- Azu At CI, .-1 U 44 Zai U) In Wo o Z CL. ELI FI to I 0 0 0 0 H a Q I 0 0 o o U t o 0 0 0 I .-t .-1 N U I A I in In m el W W1 F R 1 a, U) N N W t N N 'i e-I F W I CO a n W n N I It I ItI I 1 I 1 W I a I z I W I n W U) n a W II U H .7 F. n IA z fa) I t I.. W U) I 1 4 E a z I ,21 a o I co [moi. F n I•-I Cl) W • a n V) Z 00 o W I-1 II a. 0 U nS V) n F u F F COZ n W I. ~ A n co u It v EQ FS+ ea II U u V) E. F F • 0 W n A oEl h n Z v m co 11 ri ) v0 0 11 W rt co en V) W M 01 O M CO O O N O M O t0 O N N O CO O O O N M r- O1 C' aD r-I ^ 1D U) N N O M O Ch rI A O C' C' O N N O O a' O M O l- N O1 CN .-i N O O O N C' Tr C' l- C' N N ri tD ch tD O Ul O C' .-i Z 0 N rl in O U) UD O O M 0 Ul O \0 N M 0 O• O O 0 C' O 01 O (� r4 rl O N CN C' C' 0 C' O N Ul W Z M Ul ri M M M N M N M C .-i N N C' M M ri N M r1 M N U) M en U W r4 C4 CW CO C4 D3 O1 C' ri O Ul N 0 0 CA I1) 0 0 Ul l- O) N Ul t0 O N O N 0 .-i VD VD M ri O N rn rl r) tO C' en N 1/40 C' CN ri O C' Cr O O rl M O O O Is. C' 01 O N O Ul O O 0 I- ri CO CO CO O Ul CO C' M N CD VD C' tD a0 OD %D O t0 tD O 0 O1 al N O C' On C' lD C' M O U) O Lo l` U) U) to O O _O tD U1 aD M 0 N N C' tD OD O1 U) O N O1 rI t0 Ul N ri VD VD N 1/40 c0 CA VO N C, O C' U) N C' a) N N r1 f N CA O rti Ul I M O N CD O N M O an CO C' OO N N N N �' N I Ul ri N N O >.1 V '.D M 01 rl ri N M M rI N C' OD CA N O N N 0 r! O a VD CO C' M C' B O O aD C'i I I ri O C' C' N01 N N N N VD N CO ri CO I rl ri I N C' U) N N I I I I I I N I ri I I C• I DP• 'J 4 N N N I rI Ul I N ri i I rl I ri I I C.) F M . I O U D; ri N M a > rI tD CA 0 Ul OD O O eq Ul 0 0 Ul M ri M U) V' O N O CO O 01 C d' r- Ol O CD r- [-- r- tD tO M r- C' U) N OD O Ul Ul O O O M O O an N Ul 0 01 N O V O 0) O N CD ri ri ri O C' rl U) 10 N r1 UD C' M rl ri M O M M 0 0 0 01 N O Ul O Ul M UI VD O U) O M M C' C' C' CN O1 O rrl C' ri VD O l` N C' M ri O M Ul V' O N OD N 0 OD O rl M tD N aD tD CO u0 Ul O 0 VD VD M ri I O C• M Ul w M N O N O N Cl M r-1 t0 N M CO OO C' rl N ri 01 O CO N C' N rl M Ul ri O O ri 0 a' Z O) Ul N N 0 M ri N VD Ch r1 sr C' Ul ri N C' N M ri M M 61 Ul CO ri LI) • a Ell O1 N C' 1/40 U) N rl VD N ri ri rl N O) rI ri ri F F a O rI N N ). gC w ri v. N N tD 0 C' t0 O 0 N 0 0 0 N 01 N N U) tD O N O N O 01 01 O 0 N O Ul O U1 N O tD M O O N O r1 O C' VD O O C- 0 O O M M r1 N ri tD O in O Ul Ul rl ri l` 0 CO O OD O [r W O N tD 01 O N M O1 O N O O O W O 0 0 Ch N U) CA CO ri O Ul O OD O1 U) Ul O t0 C' O O U) OD O1 O N N M O ri M rl rI M Ul r U) D1 U) C' C' t0 O r-1 ri CO U1 rI M M O M N eq N VD Z x 4C' Ul ao ri U) M !- N V' r4t0 i Cs C0 N CO Ul C' M aD I- [- op N MI W 41 E. a O N C' M O U) VD OD M N N C' r-1 N ri r1 N N M N Li) E. Tr a4 Z F m ri .-♦ ri M `t sr Cl. CCa, a' OU '-1 N ED C) . oEa "n aL Cu ri U Q W M x o En in w0 wci) O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >, CU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1Fi W Kt 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U O O 01 O M Tr r-r VD tD N up N M U) U) O1 O O O N O U) CN N O N N U) O U) O a0 O 0 O W O M O N co C' op co 1D N 1D OD N O1 Ul M O Ul C' l- Ul r-I N O Ol tD h (NJ C' rI C' OD O (-4 0) U1 O\rl r1 C' N m t0 O1 C' C' OD C' C' N co O 0 0 O to N C' U1 kr) C' M N O m M M 'y N C' N r4 M C' N CD M C' O M M N O1 OD rl OD rl N rl M C' VD M M ri N 4 W C N ri ri N ri M ri t0 N a F >C N M Cn D3 w 0 U) U) W 0) z o � ZE. 4' F Q CO w Z w U U O W a U gc Z DI r>. .i Z I1 M W 0 rI ti O U ~ a CO 0 Z Oz 42 a ~ 01 w > > Z vi w0 ac as 42 vZco na. aFZ (x)CC 0) F 0 w a CO DI 4 .1 a 66 Z .. U) F 0) .7 I- U U: > U) x 0 FA .a CD CI. E Z U. F a w Fi 41 2M . n FA CO x 0 O 0 O F F z wFEE O rZEO Z ..22X w4EnZw COZa W w W F a u) ac�. wF .i aCO EU CO Z I-, w I E. , U) EUF 0 0cn4a E. ESO W W OI-+�[ii cnU Z x E- a Z E. CO W 26 DI 0C C) Cd '''4U.. Z ( Z �'E. Zz00 W O\.�-IZZZ >' [Z:IU) � S /a-. FF U 0 Cz E ' Ci < - Z Co FI-I HE W Fk" 0) 00X .7FrI < F (Y .3 .3c.) as CO 0 U) FcnE UFCW co a Qaa0a2EF, xk: ZQawaEs '-4Et) < W UwU) O we W Ct2QW •l .7EYa aEll C) .1 .. waUrs. r' Fw > Ell Z0 .= Es. FUxmEnaw ri CD 51CD410dUxOa4) D: E .1 42F 'rHO2> FiaO .10) .142> r. U: FA2C2CU) U; W WO .1 0 4 > 4 > wNHwwZ00 Q CL, 41000l < FCL) ar+ OwaCOaZFOEta r+ < Oacc < UO 30300. a G. fx03U FO OEEwC1n 0Eau. C6E• FQa .ia0crE000) a. U) 41 0 ri N O ri r/ N C' U1 rI N ri O F O U) N O O N U) O O VO O r4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ri M U) r OD h O O r1 ri N N N N M C' in r` CO ri rl N M Tr a C' Ul rI ri N N M C' U1 t0 CO CA ri M M M M M M 0) .-i ri ri ri rl rl rl rl ri rl ri rl nN N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M C' C' C' C' C' C' C' 0 tr.. C' C' C' C' C' C' a C' C' C' C' C' U) C' CI C' C' C' a C' er C' C' C' C' C' C' C' T. C' C' C' C' C' a C' C' C' n 0 O. CO O D u o -1 In Lel u •1 II 4: I n 0 u O u c, z0 H 0 .r n n F W II • u t' [a; w II N .•I .-i 1 47 Z 0 N O II elr J W II Q1 W Z N m 11 aa. II 10 UW II n r:: X ii O. a; p, u L W II W X n 11 G. W n II • 11 0 CO •A a0 II 0 a0 CO OD II ON II II • a U1 I II 0 •-. n en N . 1 II u, e' 1.11 III n 01 I 0 n as n n en a In I E- W II 0 u .-1 1 - Uu urtt UN n m E < Z N ..1 ac N N F ..IU W 0 II .-I .d• to F eC Z a I C9 F 1.4 II I I , W 4 .� u N N 1 DUB II .I 4i1 0 Ft 1.4 II 1 0 < eC 11 0OC u E 1 = > 11 VT .7 4 a 11 i 1 II m > u t/r 1 II II I II II II II u II II I 0 N C' C' 1 0 en ri H II 1.-1 I 1 • II C. 1; 1 0 CO lC 1/40 II • 1. I en I"- N 11 0 II (a) I 0 C1 01 II N II • .] N IW u .-I I 0 4 Z u v r • .] CO II - I • FGW. I a' 01 O •CZ u en I F D • UX I sif) E- E-• C. x m aI < W 1 - • UX u - I I >• [a7 11 .-e 1 I II L? 1 II I n I u n 0 C, N N 0 up .-1 r•I n m u 0 N m en II • I N N N 11 0 1 E- .•a O 0 11 CO 1 Z = < L.- ..a II I • -W W ^ 0 %o a: a% Z WFCEn • OL Z - N en Cr.) [a) N_ � a .-1 a. ao+ C 0 U .-I i? WE- c txZ - 11 o 1 00"•-• ZI Z < irk a. Ixm CC 0U u v I HcII. •-I U 00---- 0E < 114n- I W n X a. .••1 U If Cl) In 0 C n W 0 Cl) U1 1I II. (/) [s: 0 II O Z La. It., U) W O t 0 O OI O O Z [a. >• a 0 0 0 0 [:: 0 n o u FXV) • >• a. 110 u W4 to 0 0 0 E- Xu) u • u U 1 CO n (n •-• [a < u 0 II O 011 n n n i U n In II L: W0 u n II E-. Cr) '.o O .-1 .-4 I L:) W n . u < Z ..I U1 N N F Cl) II UI II E W .-1 0\ N f e". Z II N II .-. a• - VY Z [a) II .••I I1 '-+ X .•.1 .-I a. n - n U) Cal VT F X u to II L:) v) Li u yr it W I u 1 1 1 I • • • - I: 1 I: Cl) W I I. 14 a n U 0 u r .-I F H 1. > 1•-I II I C C u u La Z n ..a V) W 11 4 II a. a E» Z Ii .b X 11 0 C I. W Z u E.. c [p O u ▪ u } Cil .. u 0 G. I, .. F F GF n 0 . a. I: Z = Ca u [i Q. Z •-+ 11 LL LC 1 Z 0 Z ( U u ..7 Li a .. V) C U Cr, n < ONE-. .. 4: a cc • . • H 0 4 <0 H Z F n U E- L': E- n [a: U u 0 0 it W u 0 F 0 FU n L r. 1 as 0 t.r.. 0 [a: 0 0 cc II C' 0 U1 Z II Z 0 II 'Cr Cl) c a) .). c 0 0 u [a. \ \ OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Regular Session Shakopee, Minnesota June 9, 1994 MEMBERS PRESENT: Madigan, Mars, DuBois, Christensen MEMBERS ABSENT: Joos STAFF PRESENT: Lindberg Ekola, Planning Director Paul Bilotta, Senior Planner Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer Lisa Anderson, Recording Secretary I. ROLL CALL Chrmn. Mars called the meeting to order at 7 : 33 p.m. Roll call was taken as noted above. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. III. APPROVAL OF MAY 5, 1994, MEETING MINUTES The meeting minutes were approved as presented. IV. RECOGNITION OF INTERESTED CITIZENS Chrmn. Mars recognized anyone in the audience wishing to speak on any item not on the agenda. There was no response. V. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE TO EXPAND THE HOURS OF OPERATION SPECIFIED IN THE CITY CODE FOR MINERAL EXTRACTION AND LAND REHABILITATION PERMITS FOR A MINE LOCATED AT 6896 HWY. 101 - J. L. SHIELY CO. - RESOLUTION NO. 687 . Chrmn. Mars opened the public hearing regarding this matter. The Planning Director gave a brief update regarding this matter. He stated that the Shiely Company is requesting a variance to Section 11. 05, Subd. 7 .C. 8 , regarding the hours of operation for mining. The subject site is located within the Heavy Industrial (I-2) Zoning District. Section 11. 05, Subd. 7 , Subparagraph C, Item 8 , regarding the hours of operation for mining, states as follows: "That all mining operations shall be conduced between the hours of 7 : 00 a.m. and 7 : 00 p.m. Any operations not conducted between the hours of 7 : 00 a.m. and 7 : 00 p.m. shall require a conditional use permit. Such permits shall be granted for public or private Minutes of the Page-2 Board of Adjustment and Appeals June 9, 1994 emergency or whenever any reasonable or necessary repairs to equipment are required to be made. " The Planning Director stated that based on the review of this request with regard to the criteria, Staff recommended to the Board denial of this variance. The Planning Director stated that the Shiely Company has had the hours of operation from 7: 00 a.m. to 7: 00 p.m. for the past ten years. He also stated that there are three mining operations in the City of Shakopee. Mr. Bob Bieraugel, Manager of Shiely Company, 2915 Waters Road, Eagan, Minnesota, approached the podium. He stated that they are located in a district specifically created for Heavy Industrial uses, and therefore feels that by extending the hours from 6: 00 a.m. to 7 : 00 p.m. this should not create a problem. The primary purpose for the extension of hours is for protecting neighboring properties from noise intrusions and also for the comfort of the mining operators. The earlier start would allow the mining operators to haul from the pit during the cooler morning hours and provide faster service to customers. Comm. DuBois asked for clarification of how long the mining season is in operation. Mr. Bieraugel stated that the mining season runs from April through October, and the extension of hours would only be for those months. Chrmn. Mars asked anyone else in the audience wishing to speak on this matter. There was no response. Comm. Christensen asked for clarification from staff regarding the rebuttal from the applicant to the staff's proposal. She also asked where the other two mining operations are located and if they have restricted hours of operation. The Planning Director responded that the other two mining operations are located in the agricultural zoning district closer to residential uses. Therefore, more restrictive hours of operation are on those. Motion: Comm. Madigan/Christensen move to close the public hearing. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Comm. Christensen/DuBois offered Variance Resolution No. PC-687, a Resolution approving a one hour Minutes of the Page - 3 Board of Adjustment and Appeals June 9, 1994 variance to the 7 : 00 a.m. to 7 : 00 p.m. restriction to the hours of operation for mining, and move its adoption. Each commissioner stated how they plan to vote and their reasons for their decision. Vote: Motion failed three to one, with Comm. Mars, Christensen and Madigan voting against the motion and Comm. DuBois voting in favor of it. VI. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR A 7 ' VARIANCE FROM THE 35 ' STREET SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT IN THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICT, IN ORDER TO BUILD AN ADDITION ONTO THE HOUSE AT 306 SOMMERVILLE STREET — TIMOTHY R. REIN — RESOLUTION NO. 685. Chrmn. Mars opened the public hearing regarding this matter. The Planning Director gave a brief update regarding this matter. He stated that applicant is requesting a 7 foot variance from the street side yard setback for a 2 story addition to his home. The site is located at 306 South Sommerville Street, Shakopee, Minnesota, and is zoned Medium Density Residential (R-3) . If this variance were approved, the addition would be constructed 28 feet from the property line. If this variance is approved, the proposed addition to the principal structure would be 8 feet behind the existing building line for the principal structure. Staff is recommending approval of this variance request. Chrmn. Mars asked if this property would be consistent with other structures on the block, and the Planning Director stated that it would be. Mr. Timothy R. Rein, 306 Sommerville Street, Shakopee, MN, approached the podium. He stated that in order to build this lot with the setbacks, he would be able to put up a thirteen foot wide building. He stated that this addition would be eight feet back from the existing house. Mr. Rein asked the Planning Commission for approval of this variance. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Madigan offered a motion to close the public hearing. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Minutes of the Rage - 4 Board of Adjustment and Appeals June 9, 1994 Motion: Comm. DuBois/Madigan offered variance Resolution No. PC-685, a resolution approving a 7 foot variance to the required 35 foot minimum street side yard setback to construct a 2-story addition onto the principal structure within the medium density residential (R-3) zoning district, and move its adoption. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. VII. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE ACCEPTABLE EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS IN ORDER TO KEEP THE BUILDING APPEARANCES UNIFORM AT 800 W. 1ST AVE. - RAHR MALTING COMPANY - RESOLUTION NO. 684 . Chrmn. Mars opened the public hearing regarding this matter. The Planning Director stated that Rahr Malting has requested a Variance to acceptable building materials in the I-2 Heavy Industrial Zoning District to build an addition to the rail load-out building located on the north portion of the Rahr site adjacent to Highway 169 . A similar variance was granted in October 1992 , but was not acted upon within the one year time frame. He stated that staff's research has revealed that the proposed addition will also require a setback variance. Public hearing notices have not been distributed for the required setback variance. Therefore, staff recommends that the Board of Adjustments and Appeals continue the present public hearing to the July meeting, when both required variances will be considered. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Madigan offered a motion to continue the public hearing regarding the application for a variance to acceptable building materials in the I-2 heavy industrial district to the July 7 , 1994 , Board of Adjustments and Appeals meeting. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. VIII. OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business to discuss. IX. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8 : 01 p.m. OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Session Shakopee, Minnesota June 9 , 1994 MEMBERS PRESENT: Madigan, Mars, DuBois, Christensen MEMBERS ABSENT: Joos STAFF PRESENT: Lindberg Ekola, Planning Director Paul Bilotta, Senior Planner Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer Lisa Anderson, Recording Secretary I. ROLL CALL Vice Chrmn. Mars called the meeting to order at 8 : 01 p.m. The roll call was taken as noted above. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. III. APPROVAL OF THE MAY 5, 1994, MEETING MINUTES The minutes of the May 5, 1994 , meeting were approved as presented. IV. RECOGNITION OF INTERESTED CITIZENS Vice Chrmn. Mars recognized anyone in the audience wishing to speak on any item not on the agenda. There was no response. V. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Motion: Comm. Christensen/Madigan offered a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. VI. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 150' TALL BUILDING IN A DISTRICT WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENT OF 45 ' , UPON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 800 W. 1ST AVE. - RAHR MALTING COMPANY - RESOLUTION NO. 683 . Vice Chrmn. Mars opened the public hearing regarding the above entitled matter. The Planning Director gave a brief update regarding this matter. He stated that Rahr Malting Company has submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit to construct an addition to present storage facilities that will exceed the 45 foot height limit. The land is Minutes of the Page 2 Shakopee Planning Commission June 9, 1994 currently zoned Heavy Industrial (I-2) . The proposed grain storage tower will be 150 feet above grade level and have a capacity of approximately 1, 000 , 000 bushels of grain. The building would be constructed of concrete. Upon review of the Flying Cloud Airport Comprehensive Plan, staff has determined that the structure will not interfere with existing or future flight approach areas. The addition of the proposed storage facility will not affect the need for utilities or parking. The Planning Director stated that staff is recommending approval for this Conditional Use Permit request. Mr. Dan Hennes, Plant Manager, 800 West 1st Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the podium. He stated that they are looking at building a storage facility for the new Malt house. He stated that this new facility will be located on the east end of the property and will blend in with the existing elevator storage. He stated that this facility will be built out of concrete and has no intention of ever painting this storage facility. Vice Chrmn. Mars asked whether this expansion will increase the traffic load. The applicant responded that it will increase the railroad traffic. Motion: Comm. Madigan/Christensen offered a motion to close the public hearing. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Madigan offered a motion for approval of the Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. PC- 683 , and move its adoption. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. VII. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR THE RENEWAL OF MINERAL EXTRACTION AND LAND REHABILITATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 376, TO CONTINUE THE GRAVEL MINING OPERATION UPON THE PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF CR 83, SOUTH OF CR 16 AND NORTH OF VALLEY VIEW ROAD — FISCHER AGGREGATE, INC. Vice Chrmn. Mars opened the public hearing regarding the above entitled matter. The Planning Director gave a brief summary regarding this matter. He stated that Condition No. 1 of the Conditional Use Permit and the Mineral Extraction and Land Rehabilitation Permit No. 376 requires an annual review of the mining operation, and a renewal of the permits every three years. The subject site is located west of CR 83 and south of CR 16, within the Agricultural Minutes of the Page- 3 Shakopee Planning Commission June 9, 1994 Zoning District. A renewal of the permit is required in 1994 . He stated that in 1991, the Shakopee City Council adopted Ordinance No. 304 . This ordinance deleted mineral extraction as a Conditional Use in the Agricultural and Rural Residential Zoning Districts. The existing mining operation at the subject site is a legal nonconforming use. The Planning Director stated that this operation is to be operated in compliance with conditions to be established with the Conditional Use permit. In the review of this operation last year, it was discovered that two of the conditions were not being complied with due to the width and side slopes. He stated that Fischer Aggregates, Inc. , has prepared an amendment to the Planning Commission which has been tabled primarily until the zoning ordinance update was completed. The Engineering and Planning staff have inspected the subject property and conducted a review of the conditions as stated in the Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Director stated that staff recommends to the Planning Commission that the renewal be approved, subject to either amending Conditions 16 and 17 or coming into compliance with Conditions 16 and 17 or by the date of December 31, 1994 . There was a brief discussion clarifying the request. It was clarified that the proposal is not for the amendment but for the renewal of Resolution 376 which is previously approved. It does have two conditions in noncompliance, but those would be taken up in the amendment process. Comm. Christensen stated a concern that a lot of time is spent discussing these issues and then the applicants sometimes don't hold true to their promises. Mr. John Voss, Planning Consultant, Fischer Aggregates, Inc. He stated that they have a much more thought-out plan in which they are proposing than what was previously presented. He gave a brief summary of the proposed plan. Vice Chrmn. Mars asked if 50 average daily trips ingress and egress County Road 83 is an accurate figure. Mr. Peter Fischer, Fischer Aggregates, Inc. , Apple Valley, approached the podium. He responded that 50 average daily trips is an accurate figure. Mr. Todd Bolander, 1456 Sharon Parkway, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the podium. He stated that he Minutes of the Pap - 4 Shakopee Planning Commission June 9, 1994 feels the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order to enlarge the area, purchase more land, dig deeper, and screw up the water table. He stated there are a lot of homes out there and the people he has talked to don't want this changed. He is very much against this Conditional Use Permit and would not like to see it be approved. He feels that there is more like 300 average daily trips and doesn't agree that 50 is an accurate number. Ms. Beverly Koehnen, 2036 Canterbury Road, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the podium. She stated that she has been before the Planning Commission several times regarding this matter and stated her concerns. She is very much against approving the Conditional Use Permit. She went through the conditions and stated that she feels a lot of the conditions have not been met in the past. Mr. Kenneth Rutt, 1750 Canterbury Road, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the podium. He stated that he would like to see this Conditional Use Permit approved because it is a good plan and it will help get the place cleaned up. He feels this would improve this area greatly from the way the previous owners took care of it. Mr. John Voss, Planning Consultant, Fischer Aggregates, Inc. , approached the podium. He addressed some of the concerns brought forward by the public. He stated that all the conditions have been met with the exception of 16 and 17 , and stated his plan will improve the area. Ms. Shirley Rutt, 1750 Canterbury Road, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the podium. She stated that Fischer Aggregates Inc. , have a good proposal to really clean the area up and would like to see this Conditional Use Permit approved. Comm. Christensen stated that some type of clause should be made stating that if the conditions are not met during the year, that the permit be taken away. She is tired of seeing promises made by applicants, only to be broken at a later date. Motion: Comm. Madigan/DuBois offered a motion to close the public hearing. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Comm. DuBois/Madigan offered a motion approving the renewal of the Conditional Use Permit and the Mineral Extraction and Land Reclamation Permit No. 376 , Amendment No. 1, and Amendment No. 2 , subject to either amending Conditions 16 and 17 or coming into compliance with Conditions 16 and 17 by December 31, 1994 . Minutes of the Page- 5 Shakopee Planning Commission June 9, 1994 Comm. Christenson stated she would like the Motion changed to include a clause stating that if all conditions are not met, the permit can be revoked. Amendment to the Motion: Comm. DuBois/The motion is the same as previously stated with the addition that a semi- annual review of the operation would be part of the Conditional User Permit. Amendment to the Motion failed due to a lack of a second. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Comm. DuBois/Christenson offered a motion requesting Staff to do a review of the operation no later than August 31 of each year. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. VIII . PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A VETERINARY CLINIC AND A KENNEL TO BOARD APPROXIMATELY 10 DOGS UPON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 663 E. CR 72 . - GREGORY T. MILLER DVM - RESOLUTION NO. 686. Vice Chrmn. Mars opened the public hearing regarding the above entitled matter. The Senior Planner gave a brief summary regarding this matter. He stated that the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to operate a veterinary clinic and a ten dog kennel upon his property at 663 East CR 72, and located in the R-1 Zoning District. The operation would include preventative medicine, therapeutic medicine, surgery, dentistry, sales of prescription drugs and pet foods, and the boarding and grooming of dogs and cats. The applicant is proposing regular business hours of between 9: 00 a.m. and 8: 00 p.m. He stated that the applicant does not anticipate having the animals outside of the clinic/kennel except during transportation to and from the site. The Senior Planner stated that staff is recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit subject to the conditions as stated in the Staff Report. Mr. Gregory T. Miller, 663 East County Road 72 , Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the podium. He stated that he doesn't plan to turn this into a business practice. He has two other veterinary practices and he regards this as Minutes of the Page- 6 Shakopee Planning Commission June 9, 1994 an artillery type of business. He doesn't want any problems with his neighbors. Mr. Jim Hayes, 4095 County Road 79, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the podium. He stated that a concern about noise control. He is not opposed to this Conditional Use Permit, he just wanted some clarification. Motion: Comm. Christenson/Madigan offered a motion to close the public hearing. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Madigan offered Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 686, a Resolution granting a Conditional Use Permit allowing the applicant to operate a veterinary clinic and 10 unit kennel within the Rural Residential (R-1) Zoning District, subject to the following conditions, and move its adoption: 1. The maximum number of pets to be boarded at any given time shall be limited to 10. 2 . The hours of operation shall be limited to between 9: 00 a.m. to 8: 00 p.m. , except for emergencies. 3 . Pets may be kept on the premises overnight for the following purposes: 1. ) Hospitalization; 2 . ) Short term vacation boarding. 4 . The applicant shall submit a plan for the disposal of animal waste, remains, infectious waste, and laboratory waste. The animal waste disposal plan must be approved by the Planning Department prior to the release of the building permit. 5. A separate septic system and drainfield shall be installed for use by the veterinary clinic and kennel only. 6. All cages in use must be cleaned daily as often as necessary for sanitary reasons and to control odors. 7 . All animals must be confined within the clinic/kennel, except for transportation to and from the' clinic, and during exercise runs. During exercise runs, animals must remain on a leash, and the attendant must remove and dispose of any fecal matter in a sanitary manner. The applicant must not construct any outdoor runs for the animals. Minutes of the Page - 7 Shakopee Planning Commission June 9, 1994 8 . The maximum of 5 employees (including the property owner) may work on the site at any given time. 9 . The facility must meet all state and county health code requirements. 10 . If the City receives any valid complaints, staff will bring the conditional use permit back to the Planning Commission for review. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. A short recess was taken at 9 : 30 p.m. Reconvene at 9 : 40 p.m. IX. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: TO CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE SCHERER SOUTH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED NORTH OF 4TH AVE. , SOUTH OF HWY. 101 AND WEST OF CERTAINTEED. Vice Chrmn. Mars opened the public hearing regarding the above entitled matter. The Planning Director gave a short summary regarding this matter. He stated that Scherer Brothers Lumber has submitted applications for approval of both the Preliminary Development Plan and the Final Development Plan for proposed Planned Unit Development for Scherer South. The subject is to be located on the north side of 4th Avenue and West of the existing Certain-teed site. He stated that staff recommends the approval of the Preliminary and Final Development Plans subject to the conditions as stated in the Staff report. Comm. Mars asked the days of the week this company would be in operation. The Planning Director responded Scherer Brothers Lumber would be open Monday through Friday and not open on the weekends. Mr. Robert Olson, 5010 Hillsboro Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota, approached the podium. He displayed a diagram of the office portion of the main building completion. He stated that the balance of the building would be concrete, the exterior would be masonry, and the roof shingled and sloped. Mr. Olson also displayed a map and gave a description of what the outdoor storage will look like. Minutes of the Page - 8 Shakopee Planning Commission June 9, 1994 The Planning Director commented that the project as proposed by the developers from 4th Avenue, is working well as meeting the contents of the ordinance. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Madigan offered a motion to close the public hearing. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Comm. DuBois/Madigan offered a motion recommending approval of the Preliminary and Final Development Plans for the Scherer South Planned Unit Development to the City Council, subject to the following conditions, and move its approval: 1. The following variances from the Zoning Ordinance are approved: A. Section 11. 03, Subd. 3 .C, regarding Lot Provisions, which states, "Except in the case of planned developments as provided for hereinafter, not more than one principal building shall be located on a lot" . The approval of this PUD allows the following buildings to be constructed on the subject site: a. Office Building. A one story office structure which includes a 2 , 230 square foot hardware sales area and a 1, 530 square foot display area. Millwork/Warehouse. A single story structure, 64 , 000 square feet in area, used as a millwork warehouse. Closed Dock. Loading dock and connecting link between office and millwork / warehouse structure, 3 , 299 square feet in area. b. Garage. A single story, 4 , 800 square foot structure, used for light maintenance, washing, and parts storage. c. Warehouse. A single story structure 30, 000 square feet in area, used for cold storage for roofing, siding, and related hardware. d. Covered Storage. 24 , 800 square feet of covered storage, open on one side only. The back of this structure will form perimeter screening and fencing for the site. e. President Homes. A warehouse, 2 , 400 square feet in side, and 4 , 800 square Minutes of the Page- 9 Shakopee Planning Commission June 9, 1994 feet of open loading docks. To include a small office and restroom facility. B. Section 11.05, Subd. 4.B, regarding Fences, which states, "Fences in excess of the above heights shall require a Conditional Use Permit" (or approval through a PUD) . The approval of this PUD allows a fence, eight (8) feet in height, to be constructed on the subject site. The fence shall be located within the areas designated on the site plans. Barbed wire fences shall not be permitted on the site. C. Section 11.33, Subd. 3.N, states that "retail sales and displays are allowed as a Conditional Use when they are necessary to a permitted principal use carried on in a structure located on the premises, but the area so used shall not exceed 15 percent of the principal structure" . The PUD shall comply with the requirements of Section 11. 33 , Subd. 3 .N. The office, dock, and millwork / warehouse building serves as the principal structure on the subject site. The applicant's submittal identifies 3 ,760 square feet of retail (display and hardware) area within this proposed structure. Retail operations shall be limited to Monday through Friday from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. The calculations as per Section 11. 33 , Subd. 3 .N would be as follows: Office (First Floor / Phase I only .1,400' sq. Closed Dock (40' x 80' ) 3 , 200' sq. Millwork / Warehouse (160' x 240' ) 36, 600' sq. Total Area of Principal Structure 51,200' sq. 3 ,760' sq. Total Retail Proposed by Applicant 51, 200 'sq. Total Area of Principal Structure = 7. 35% of Structure 2 . The following procedural actions must be taken: A. A Development Agreement stating the conditions of approval of the Planned Unit Development must be filed with the Scott County Recorder. B. A Major Subdivision plat must be approved and recorded for the subject site. Minutes of the Page-10 Shakopee Planning Commission June 9, 1994 3 . The following must be approved prior to approval of the Preliminary and Final Development Plans by the City Council: A. The Stormwater Management Plan, including the stormwater calculations and ponding design, must be approved by the City Engineer prior to the approval of the PUD by the City Council. B. Verification of the approval of the Stormwater Management Plan by the Lower Minnesota Watershed District must be submitted to the City prior to the approval of the Final Development Plan for the PUD by the City Council. C. A revised landscape plan must be approved by the Planning Director prior to the approval of the PUD by the City Council. 4. The following must be completed prior to the recording of the Development Agreement with the Scott County Recorder's Office: A. The applicant shall submit verification that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has approved the NPDES Stormwater Permit for the proposed Planned Unit Development prior to the recording of the Final Development Plan with the Scott County Recorder's Office. B. The applicant shall submit verification that the private sanitary sewer easements between the property owner to the west (Certain Teed, owned by Saint-Gobain Corporation) and Scherer Bros. have been completed and executed. C. The applicant shall submit verification that easements for the 8" private watermain proposed for the site have been completed and executed. The existing 1" water service line in 4th Avenue to Scherer South will be disconnected and plugged at the 12" main. D. The applicant shall submit a revised Final Development Plan which shows the location of the easement for the VIP sewer. 5. Approval of the Preliminary and Final Development Plans are contingent upon the following: Minutes of the Page-11 Shakopee Planning Commission June 9, 1994 A. Approval of the Final Development Plan is contingent upon the approval of the Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan and the Erosion Control Plan by the City Engineer. B. Approval of the Final Development Plan is contingent upon the resolution of the stormwater issues. 6. The following must be completed prior to the approval of a Building Permit: A. All proposed signage requires the approval of Sign Permits from the City of Shakopee, and must meet the requirements of Section 4. 30, Subd. 4 . B. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of Scott County Environmental Health (SCEH) regarding Hazardous Waste licenses. C. The applicant shall agree to construct a concrete reinformed slab (20' x 24' x 18" thick) beneath the railroad spur ballast to protect the existing 27" RCP CL 3 sanitary sewer. D. A total of two fire hydrants are required to serve the site, and each must flow 1, 500 gallons when both are in use. The additional hydrant will be required to be located on the east side of the office building and parking lot. E. The applicant shall pay the existing special assessments against this property prior to the approval of the Building Permit. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. X. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE SCHERER SOUTH ADDITION, LOCATED NORTH OF 4TH AVE. , SOUTH OF HWY 101 AND WEST OF CERTAINTEED. — SCHERER BROTHERS LUMBER. Vice Chrmn. Mars opened the public hearing regarding the above entitled matter. The Planning Director stated that staff would like this public hearing be continued to the July 7, 1994 , Planning Minutes of the Page -12 Shakopee Planning Commission June 9, 1994 Commission meeting to allow time for the stormwater issues to be resolved. Motion: Comm. Christenson/DuBois offered a motion to continue the public hearing to the July 7 , 1994 , meeting of the Planning Commission, and move its approval. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. XI. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: TO CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE PRAIRIE BEND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, LYING SOUTH OF EAST 4TH AVE.AND SOUTH AND WEST OF THE KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS HALL. — SIENNA CORP. Vice Chrmn. Mars opened the public hearing regarding the above entitled matter. The Senior Planner stated that the applicant has been working with a potential developer to the east of the Prairie Bend development to slightly redesign one of the street locations. This change will allow a major grouping of full-grown trees to be saved when the eastern property is developed. Due tot he drafting changes required, the applicant has requested that the case be continued until the July meeting. He stated that staff applauds the applicant's willingness to cooperate with adjacent property owners in order to minimize future environmental impacts and recommended that the Planning Commission grant their request for continuance. Motion: Comm. DuBois/Madigan offered a motion to continue the public hearing for the Prairie Bend Planned Unit Development to the July 7 , 1994 , meeting of the Planning Commission, and move its approval. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. XII. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: TO CONSIDER THE REZONING OF A 7 . 5 ACRE PARCEL LYING SOUTH OF CRETEX AVE. AND NORTH OF THE RR TRACK FROM HIGHWAY BUSINESS (B-1) TO HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (I-2) — PRINCESS MARBLE. Vice Chrmn. Mars opened the public hearing regarding the above entitled matter. The Senior Planner gave a brief update regarding this matter. He stated that the applicant has submitted an application for an Amendment to the Zoning Map. They are requesting that the City rezone a 7 . 5 acre site from Highway Business to Heavy Industrial. The site is being Minutes of the Page-13 Shakopee Planning Commission June 9, 1994 proposed for industrial development by the applicant and is located south of the Blue Lake Treatment Plant on the south side to T.H. 101. The area is currently zoned B-1, Highway Business. The Senior Planner stated that one thing unique about this parcel is that currently, due to the vacation of Cretex Avenue, there is no access to two of the three lots within the subject site. The applicant has submitted an application for minor subdivision approval which would consolidate the three lots into one lot. The application is currently being reviewed by staff. The applicant is taking the necessary step to resolve the access issue with the minor subdivision application. He stated that staff is recommending approval of the minor subdivision application and the rezoning. Motion: Comm. Madigan/Christenson offered a motion to close the public hearing. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Comm. Christenson/Dubois offered a motion to recommend to the City Council the approval of the request to rezone the subject site from Highway Business (B-1) to Heavy Industrial (I-2) subject to detaining the issue of building permits for Lots 1, 2, and 3 , Block 1 until access to all three lots has been provided. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. XIII. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT FOR MONNENS ADDITION, LYING ON THE EAST SIDE OF MARKET STREET, SOUTH OF 5TH AVE. - MONNENS CUSTOM BUILDERS. Vice Chrmn. Mars opened the public hearing regarding this matter. The Planning Director stated that Monnens Custom Builders has submitted applications for approval of both the Preliminary and Final Plat for Monnens Addition. The proposed subdivision is located on the east side of Market Street, south of 5th Avenue. The area is zoned R- 2, Urban Residential and consists of 2 lots. He stated that staff is recommending approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat for Monnens Addition, subject to the conditions as stated in the staff report, with the following changes: Minutes of the Page -14 Shakopee Planning Commission June 9, 1994 Condition 1 B. Subd.A. - The Park Dedication Requirement shall be a cash payment in lieu of park land. The total park dedication requirement of $2 , 100. 00 will be required to be paid at the time of the recording of the building permit. Condition 2 A. - To state that the applicant shall provide the compaction testing if needed as determined by the building official. The Planning Director stated that these changes are recommendations of staff. Vice Chrmn. Mars stated he remembered two houses being on this property. The applicant, Jeff Monnens, 447 South Market Street, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the podium. He stated that there was only one small house located on this property. Vice Chrmn. Mars stated in his opinion the proposal was a good idea and encouraged other housing infill projects like this. Motion: Comm. Madigan/DuBois offered a motion to close the public hearing. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Comm. DuBois/Christenson offered a motion recommending to the City Council the approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat for Monnens Addition, subject to the following conditions, and move its approval: 1. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the Final Plat: A. Approval of the title opinion by the City Attorney. B. Execution of a Developer's Agreement for the following requirements: a. The Park Dedication Requirement shall be a cash payment in lieu of park land. Park dedication fees shall be deferred on a lot by lot basis and are to be paid prior to the release of each principal structure building permit. b. The City Engineer will reapportion the existing special assessments against the Minutes of the Page -15 Shakopee Planning Commission June 9, 1994 lots and the developer shall waive his right to appeal the reapportionment. C. A permit for work in the right-of-way is hereby approved to allow City utility services to be provided to Lot 2 . 2 . The following must be completed prior to the approval of Building Permits for the site: A. The applicant shall provide on-site observation and compaction testing of house pads by a registered soils engineer when native soils are displaced, or when building sites are filled, if needed, as determined by the Building Official. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. XIV. VACATION: TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF THE PORTION OF VIERLING DRIVE BETWEEN CR 15 AND HARRISON STREET AND A PORTION OF PRESIDENTIAL LANE - CITY OF SHAKOPEE. This item was under the Consent Agenda and was approved unanimously. XV. VACATION: TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF THE 20° WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS ON TWO LOTS AT 4401 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL BLVD. SOUTH - ASHLAND OIL, INC. This item was under the Consent Agenda and was approved unanimously. XVI. VACATION: TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF THE 10 ° WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS LOCATED ALONG THE INTERIOR LOT LINE OF THE TWO VACANT LOTS BETWEEN SUPER 8 MOTEL AND EAGLE CREEK PLAZA. - MURRAY WILLIAMSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. This item was under the Consent Agenda and was approved unanimously. XVII. DISCUSSION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES. The Senior Planner stated that the second packet regarding the Comprehensive Plan is to be turned in to staff, and the third packet was available for each member. He stated that the intention is to come back for approval at the July 7th, Planning Commission meeting. Minutes of the Page-16 Shakopee Planning Commission June 9, 1994 Comm. Christenson stated a concern that agricultural land is somewhat being ignored. She stated that there is a need to preserve agricultural land. Comm. DuBois asked what the next process is regarding the Comprehensive Plan. The Senior Planner gave a brief summary of the completion process. The ultimate goal is to have all the changes possibly completed by August. XVIII. OTHER BUSINESS: Vice. Chrmn. Mars stated that some of the City walking paths need to be swept or cleaned of debris. The Staff Engineer stated that this matter would be looked into. Comm. DuBois suggested that when a property is being rezoned, a sign be illustrated to inform any interested persons, in order for them to voice their concerns or opinions. Staff noted that they would report back on this item. Comm. DuBois also suggested that when land is being cleared for construction or is being developed, that no trees be removed unless absolutely necessary. She suggested putting something in writing stating that trees need to be replaced if taken down. The Senior Planner suggested that this concern be addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. Vice Chrmn. Mars noted that the 1994 Annual City Picnic is going to be held on August 15, at Lion's Park. Vice Chrmn. Mars stated that the Planning Commission is two members short and encouraged people to get their applications in to the City Hall as soon as possible. XIX. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 10: 35 p.m. It MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Stans House - Contractor Selection Phase III DATE: June 17, 1994 INTRODUCTION: The Stans house has been relocated to the new site on Second Avenue. It would be appropriate at this time for the HRA to select a contractor to complete the remaining building improvements . BACKGROUND: Work on the Stans house project has been split into the following phases : 1 . House relocation by moving contractor (Voight Movers) 2 . Phase I construction work - consisting of preparing original home site for moving and excavation of original foundation. 3 . Phase II - foundation construction at new site including all necessary utility hook-ups . Shown in attachment #1 is a list of improvements that need to be completed on the Stans house prior to occupancy. This work has been categorized into Phase III construction. Cost quotations for the work outlined in attachment #1 have been sent to eleven local building contractors . The quotation deadline was set for June 20th. At the meeting on June 21st, staff will be prepared to present the cost quotations to the HRA. Following a review of the quotations, it would be appropriate to authorize the appropriate HRA officials to execute the appropriate agreements with the contractor selected to preform said work. It is important to note that the building code improvements outlined in Phase III do not include exterior building improvements. Staff would like the HRA to provide additional direction to staff with respect to the desire to pursue exterior building improvements. Possible exterior improvements include either painting and/or new siding. Staff will have cost estimates for these options at our meeting. ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Select a contractor for Phase III and authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the appropriate agreements. 2 . Do not select a contractor at this time. 3 . Table action pending further information from staff . 4 . Provide direction with respect to exterior building improvements . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternatives #1 and #4 . ACTION REQUESTED: 1 . Select a contractor for Phase III and authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the appropriate agreements. 2 . Provide direction to staff with respect to exterior building improvements . N. E. C. ATTACHMENT #1 - Provide new service with panel, 100 amp. - Proper receptacle and locations verification throughout - Exterior lighting for front, rear and side entrys - Hardwired smoke detector locations, all floors - All G. F. I. locations - Check all existing wiring/switching for possible replacement if required - Proper overhead or wall mount lighting location verification throughout - Confirm existing wiring and/or fixture with expected circuitry amperage - Confirm any electrical hook-ups for appliances - Provide underground circuit for future garage (location • confirmation required) • - This division shall reflect expected costs for all repair, replace with new and/or add new (labor and material) • U.B.C. • - Provide new steps and railings if required at entry locations - Repair any exterior porch construction, front or rear that appears to be in disrepair - Install new stairway to basement level (provide maximum headill room height) , add railing - Install new egress window in basement level , - . - Inspect existing roofing materials and application for code ,!,:;.1-- _ compliance Vim' - Confirm post and tean locations := any and install as rec__red ` at basement level ``'- - Secure front and rear exteric_ doors as to their swing Ki cperation, weather seal and passage lock hardware (add kW thresholds where necessary) ' - Confirm all window locks, replace or repair throughout g 70 - Install hand railings where applicable - Confirm bedrecn window egress requirements ` - Confirm all window glazing and operation, repair as need be - Provide new _lock case for existing chimney flue at basement level U.M.C. /State of Minnesota Amendments - Provide retrofit of existing boiler. Add pump if necessary. gt Install backflow prevention as required - Check all radiator locations and their operation, bleeding air •. a.. from lines may be necessary "`. - Provide new water heater and all required installation L;,. - Provide all required venting as required : Minnesota Plumbir.c Code - Provide new fixtures as required, i.e. energy flush water closet, replace if required, fixture traps as per sizing table - Investigate all existing plumbing waste and water lines for code compliance - Install all required backflow prevention devices/vacuum breakers where required - Provide new water meter (contact S.P.U.C. Art Young) _- " Energy Code c- - Complete an energy audit of said structure by a certified '=.F..7 energy auditor and forward results _ 3 MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Stans House Disposition of Property DATE: June 15, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Staff is optimistic that the Stans house will be ready for occupancy some time in August . It would be appropriate at this time to discuss options for utilizing the property. BACKGROUND: Following is a list of options for the HRA to consider in disposing of the Stans house that was recently relocated and renovated. Option #1 - Outright Sale The HRA may wish to simply sell the property on the open market to a private party or public agency. There are several variations of this option that could be explored including the following: 1 . Outright sale on the open market . 2 . Subsidized sale to a low to moderate income family. 3 . Negotiated sale or lease to a housing agency. If the HRA wishes to pursue an outright sale on the open market, it maybe appropriate to discuss listing the home with a real estate agency. The other option of course would be to sell the home on a bid basis. Due to the difficulty in determining the criteria for establishing whether or not a family falls into the low to moderate income category, staff is opposed to directing a subsidized sale to a family. Additionally, it would be difficult for staff to qualify potential home buyers . In terms of utilizing an existing housing agency, staff is aware of two possible prospects that maybe interested in the property. Both the Scott County Housing Coalition and the Scott County Housing and Redevelopment Authority currently manage transitional housing units and seek out housing opportunities for low to moderate income families in Shakopee . The Shakopee Housing Coalition is affiliated with the Scott/Carver Community Action Agency. They have expressed interest in working with the City to provide a low to moderate income family with a housing opportunity. The Scott County Housing and Redevelopment Authority also manages several transitional housing units in Shakopee. They may also be a possible buyer for the property if the HRA wishes to ensure the future use of the property for low to moderate income family purposes . However, the Scott County HRA typically is able to acquire property at well below market rates through HUD foreclosures . Option #2 - Maintain Ownership The Shakopee HRA could select to continue to own the property and setup it' s own transitional housing program. Staff does not favor this option due to the extraordinary amount of time needed to coordinate such a program and the ongoing program maintenance cost . Summary There are a variety of options for the HRA to consider in disposing of the aforementioned property. Staff would like additional direction from the HRA with respect to the HRA' s preferred route to pursue. Upon receiving said direction, staff can provide more concrete data with respect to the possible financial implications of the perferred options . ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Direct staff to open negotiations with the Affordable Housing Coalition to dispose of the property. 2 . Authorize staff to work with the two local housing agencies in an attempt to develop a lease agreement . 3 . Direct staff to establish a program for leasing the property to a low to moderate income family. 4 . Direct staff to establish a program for selling the property to a low to moderate income family. 5 . Direct staff to obtain the services of a realtor to dispose of the property. 6 . Direct staff to advertise the property for sale on a sealed bid basis . 7 . Table action pending further information from staff . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1 . ACTION REQUESTED: Direct staff to open negotiations with the Affordable Housing Coalition to dispose of the property. /va . Deloitte & Touche /‘ 400 One Financial Plaza Telephone:(612)397-4000 120 South Sixth Street Facsimile:(612)397-4450 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55402-1844 May 13, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council The City of Shakopee, Minnesota We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the City) for the year ended December 31, 1993 and have issued our report thereon dated May 13, 1994. Our professional standards require that we communicate with you concerning certain matters that may be of interest to you in fulfilling your obligation to oversee the financial reporting and disclosure process for which management of the City is responsible. We have prepared the following comments to assist the Mayor and City Council in fulfilling that obligation. Our Responsibility under Generally Accepted Auditing Standards: Our responsibility under generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, has been described to you in our engagement letter dated November 5, 1993. As described in such letter, those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement. Those standards also require that we obtain an understanding of the City's internal control structure sufficient to enable us to properly plan our audit. We have previously issued a separate report to you, also dated May 13, 1994, containing our comments on the internal control structure. Significant Accounting Policies: The City's significant accounting policies are disclosed in the notes to the general purpose financial statements. There were no changes in these policies during 1993. Management Judgments and Accounting Estimates: Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based upon management's current judgments. Those judgments are normally based on knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. All of the significant management judgments and accounting estimates in the 1993 general purpose financial statements were normal and recurring and were determined on basis consistent with those used in prior years. DeloitteTouche Tohmatsu International Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council The City of Shakopee, Minnesota May 13, 1994 Page 2 Other Information in the Annual Report: When audited financial statements are included in documents containing other information, such as the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, generally accepted auditing standards require that we read such other information and consider whether it, or the manner of its presentation, is materially inconsistent with the information, or the manner of its presentation, in the general purpose financial statements audited by us. We have read the other information in the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and have inquired as to the methods of measurement and presentation of such information. If we had noted a material inconsistency, or if we had obtained any knowledge of a material misstatement of fact in the other information, we would have discussed this matter with management and, if appropriate, with the Mayor and City Council. Disagreements with Management: We had no disagreements with management regarding the application of accounting principles, the basis for management's judgments about accounting estimates, the scope of our audit, disclosures to be included in the general purpose financial statements, or the wording of our report on the 1993 general purpose financial statements. Consultation with Other Accountants: Management informed us that there were no consultations with other independent public accountants regarding accounting or auditing matters during 1993. Major Issues Discussed with Management Prior to Retention: We discussed no major accounting or auditing issues with management in connection with our engagement as the City's auditors in 1993. Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit: We experienced no difficulties in dealing with management relating to the performance of our audit. We received the full cooperation of management and staff. Our audit scope was essentially the same as reviewed with you in our November 5, 1993 engagement letter. We believe that we have direct and unrestricted access to the City's senior management and to the Mayor and City Council. * * * * * Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council The City of Shakopee, Minnesota May 13, 1994 Page 3 This report is intended solely for the use of the Mayor and City Council and should not be used for any other purpose. This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report which, upon acceptance by the City, is a matter of public record. We will be pleased to further discuss this report with you at your convenience. Yours truly, Deloitte & Touche /‘ 400 One Financial P;aza Telephone:(612)397-4000 120 South Sixth Street Facsimile:(612)397-4450 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55402-1844 May 13, 1994 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Shakopee, Minnesota In planning and performing our audit of the general purpose financial statements of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the City) for the year ended December 31, 1993 (on which we have issued our report dated May 13, 1994),we considered its internal control structure in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the general purpose financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control structure. In connection therewith,we submit this report containing our comments, observations, and recommendations concerning reportable conditions and administrative and operating matters which resulted from our audit of the City's 1993 general purpose financial statements. Our observations and recommendations are presented under the following main captions: I - Independent Auditors'Report on the Internal Control Structure Based on the Audit of the Financial Statements II - Current-year Administrative and Operating Matters III - Follow-up on Prior-Year Administrative and Operating Matters This report is intended solely for the information of the Mayor and City Council members, management, and others within the City. This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report which is a matter of public record. We will be pleased to discuss these recommendations with you and, if desired, to assist you in implementing any of them. Yours truly, 08/0:4 DeloitteTouche Tohmatsu International Deloitte & SECTION Touche /‘ 400 One Financial Plaza Telephone:(612)397-4000 120 South Sixth Street Facsimile:(612)397-4450 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55402-1844 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON THE INTERNAL CONTROL STRUCTURE BASED ON THE AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Shakopee, Minnesota We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 1993 and have issued our report thereon dated May 13, 1994. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement. In planning and performing our audit of the general purpose financial statements of the City for the year ended December 31, 1993, we considered its internal control structure in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the general purpose financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control structure. The management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure. In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of internal control structure policies and procedures. The objectives of an internal control structure are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition and that transactions are executed in accordance with managements authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of general purpose financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of inherent limitations in any internal control structure, errors or irregularities may nevertheless occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of the structure to future periods is subject to the risk that procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation of policies and procedures may deteriorate. For the purpose of this report, we have classified the significant internal control structure policies and procedures in the following categories: cash receipts, cash disbursements, receivables, payables, payroll, and general ledger. DelottteTouche Tohmatsu International 2 For all of the internal control structure categories listed above, we obtained an understanding of the design of relevant policies and procedures and whether they have been placed in operation, and we assessed control risk. Our consideration of the internal control structure would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control structure that might be material weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A material weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the specific internal control structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in relation to the general purpose financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control structure and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined above. This report is intended for the information of the Mayor and City Council members, management, and others within the City, and officials of applicable state agencies. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. 0:0ezoare' May 13, 1994 3 SECTION II CURRENT-YEAR ADMINISTRATIVE AND OPERATING MATTERS General Fund Programs: As noted in the prior-year comments, state revenue sources are continuing to be decreased, and the State of Minnesota is looking at its cities' financial conditions in an effort to cut State spending. This procedure has already been implemented with school districts whereby the State looked at fund balances, particularly in the general fund, as an area to potentially decrease funding. The general fund of the City has a positive fund balance of$1.6 million as of December 31, 1993, which is approximately 26%of the 1994 budgeted general fund expenditures. This fund contains several programs which directly or indirectly benefit the community or the City as a whole. These programs could be transferred to other fund types such as enterprise or internal service,where applicable. To avoid possible future funding decreases from the State, the City should consider moving programs into other funds. One area to consider would be to establish an enterprise fund for refuse collection to move the related revenue and expenditures out of the general fund. Another solution would be to create an internal service fund for equipment management and transfer in certain fixed assets (e.g., computer equipment,police vehicles, and fire department assets) from the General Fixed Asset Account Group. Thereafter, users would be charged for their use to fund future purchases. An initial transfer could be made from the General Fund to fund the depreciation on these assets. The noted transfers would help to decrease the overall general fund balance and more accurately reflect the nature of the programs and expenditures in the City's financial statements. Sewer Charges: The City continues to incur operating losses in its Sewer Fund, which have steadily increased over the prior years. Operating losses in 1991, 1992, and 1993 were equal to $38,434, $93,623, and $162,078, respectively. Due to budgetary pressures, many cities have been responding to these losses with revenue enhancement measures. Some of the most frequently used have been to increase the level of fees and charges or implementing new fees and charges to the users of the services. Also, costs passed on from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) play a significant role in the performance of the Sewer Fund. Charges from MWCC have steadily increased over the past couple of years. As a result of the variability of these costs, which are outside the City's direct control, the ability to set appropriate sewer rates becomes more difficult. The City should take a proactive approach to developing and implementing additional revenues. In regard to the Sewer Fund, the City should consider increasing the sewer billing rates to better compensate the City for services provided. It is our understanding that the City raised rates for 1993 approximately 3%and an additional 13%for 1994 to try to curve operating losses in the Sewer Fund. In addition, another way of achieving additional revenues would be to show the MWCC rate charged to the City as a separate line item on the customers'billing statements, and, as MWCC raises rates, the City could immediately raise the rates for the MWCC line item and 4 comment that the rate increase is due solely to the rate increase from MWCC. As noted above, the rate changes of MWCC are beyond the City's control, and, therefore, highlighting this change on the billing statements would make any MWCC rate increase more apparent and take pressure off of the City for increases in rates. By the City continuing to keep a close eye on the operating results of the Sewer Fund and watching more closely the MWCC rate changes and reflecting such in the customers' statements, the City could better manage the results of the fund. Popular Reporting: The goals established by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) for governmental entities for financial reporting can be summarized as providing users with the financial information to enable them to: • Assess the government's accountability • Evaluate the government's operating results for the period • Determine the government's ability to meet its obligations, yet still provide acceptable levels of service The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) represents the City's attempt to meet these objectives. These reports do an excellent job of conveying the information to sophisticated users; however, they can be quite confusing to the average citizen. One way to alleviate this situation is to supplement the CAFR with a Popular Annual Financial Report(PAFR). PAFRs are designed to provide citizens and other users with easily understood information about a City's financial and economic conditions. PAFRs can be of a variety of forms, such as general purpose financial statements, state-of-the-city reports, corporate-style annual reports, summarized financial statements, etc. There are also a variety of methods used to present the financial information from the CAFR, including condensed, consolidated/full accrual report, or the general purpose financial statement format. Additionally, some type of narrative that interprets the numbers and describes the accomplishments of the City and other economic factors should be included to translate the information to the public. With the increased sensitivity of the public regarding government, Popular Reporting is a tool available for providing constituents with financial information in a format which is more readable and understandable than the CAFR. The City may want to consider investigating this type of supplemental reporting. Depreciation on Contributed Assets: The City has recorded depreciation on all fixed assets as expenses in the enterprise funds and has elected not to close out depreciation on contributed assets to the contributed capital account. Such a practice has led to a growing contributed capital balance over the years and a lower retained earnings balance, as this account has been reduced for all depreciation recorded. S Recommendation: The City should consider closing out depreciation to the contributed capital account. By following this procedure, contributed capital will be reduced to reflect the lower carrying value of assets which were contributed. Depreciation on contributed assets would then be presented in the Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Balance as a separate line item after net income as an addition to retained earnings. 6 SECTION III FOLLOW-UP ON PRIOR-YEAR ADMINISTRATIVE AND OPERATING MATTERS In our prior-year report,we commented on the following areas: Wire Transfers: During the current year, the City notified its financial institution of the City's procedures for performing wire transfers to prevent unauthorized transfers and to ensure efficient processing of authorized transfers. Comment is not repeated in the current year. Cash and Investments Management In 1993, the City established a trust arrangement for its cash and investments where the securities are either fully insured, registered, or for which the securities are held by the City or its agent in the City's name. Thus, as of December 31, 1993, the City has obtained the lowest level of custodial credit risk as defined by GASB Statement No. 3,Deposits with Financial Institutions,Investments (including Repurchase Agreements), and Reverse Repurchase Agreements. Comment is not repeated in the current year. Fixed Assets: Currently, the City has implemented procedures whereas the ending fixed asset log balances for each fund type are reconciled to the respective fund type's general ledger balance. Also, a review of the monthly activity report is performed noting the correctness of write-offs, disposals, and purchases. Comment is not repeated in the current year. Payroll: During 1993, the City implemented various changes to the payroll function to help ensure that proper segregation of duties occurs, and, as such, it appears that the City is properly safeguarding its assets. Comment is not repeated in the current year. General Fund Programs: Comment was repeated in the current year. Collateralization of Deposits: The City monitored the adequacy of the collateral on hand to properly cover the cash balances that the City maintains. There was only one instance where the City was not properly collateralized, but, based upon our review, it was noted that the time frame was over a weekend and prior to a bond payment. Comment is not repeated in the current year. 7 LOGIS: The City, along with other cities who participate in LOGIS, has informed LOGIS that an audit of its general computer controls should be performed. LOGIS is currently planning on having an audit performed on its internal controls within the year, but is waiting until all modifications to its systems have been completed and for final budget approval of the expenditure. Comment is not repeated in the current year. Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 14: In the current year, the City implemented the standards as required under this statement. The appropriate disclosures and identification of component units were performed during the audit and appear proper. Comment is not repeated in the current year. 8 o�� v Lu CO C C3 co co 1� `D 120 _. 0r+ mai L n Im< C o C 0 CD i N1.13 2. - C!) mit c (.0 -1 0 nti -• � 0 rn Z ...0 Li) r -- N r) v a. 0 y c a d ^• ", n r C �' c n Q' 0.. n G' 0 c 0 ^' rD C '1 r [D W Sv W a, n .. � — K f- r W "1 W `' y rr CA a rr n :'-' n ,-., ."'. v `�^. N W K Co..) N G t.4 /1...i N CD pNo N Cn C cD [ i 0 p Co Co !2 su L--CA �' Cn p 0 0 O -I CD CD C) -t CD O 11 Cr f ' `'` NCA A A NA H CD W T � -p >0 > n, C co �: 1-4 0. CQT1V! ci) 11 cfl / X CO C 0 C , ti O m m 1/4C 1/40 •� F-' CA N.� �, m N - �- .p V W Cm :'° — 0 -t C ,A `V Co - c 'v C Nv �' NOo y cel ' N C� N N '-J A A cD ! `. v N V 4 W I fi-c7-1CPVNN r+ p sCe CJS .= N 0 Nom^ N NI N.-, ` CfsWW — it CO � Nv ' V - CO I I 0 O - 0 v) c x 2 5 0 rr -s t t o CD CD — 0 CCDD CCD ' bC✓ 0 o ,b :' rr a .0 rD CD a C7 0 O C D CD7, c 0 m 1 c\ I • 0\ cc C ) m t 24 N "' 1 1 CO N cA N VI c N 1 01 N `,,, `, O' pp p� Cfl �= �= Na _' I I 0 cn C„ 'v < C C7 0 C i ►� /C-4N i--► • iv -- a v 0 �D `"'. n 0 C, rn "< CD0 , ig -T1 Z7 CD "1'i 2 D t 4C. I, y 0 N w CM a) m C o 0 o CO M 0 0 0 0 4 ` r t N G1 vCD O O C ONI C C C O -69 O0 00 O0 74, Cr,: _a P Co CACD O .C C O C CD O 0 0 C O C I f Q,, n Sy " (fj _1 V (:) t 0-t ✓> r-f Q. Z p =' ) -. to N k co CD 0 o a) Q. 0 0 —I 1 o CD CD -< 3O I CD -I,i. �1 GJ 2 2 n CD M ^ I (.0 7o 0 m 1 C) -k0 5' m CO00 COCOC .A G x . N V W •4=. N 0 n y 'O �' 5 .13D CCD 1 :fl W N N y D1 •PW ^ ON �_ O c \ 1 CD DJ * - I 1 4 o � z z r (15 f' '. CD rri . i rSW .-? MHo �, I a' p CD rD 2.1 ;-i � ,, a L---1 w �' f•-r FE o tz 1 . 1 I I II CD o l< 1 30 1 o o c) m 11 0 o o :D fin y a � r," I 0 ' a' - D 1y r M ^ I o k ..-1- (D y74" 0 Iv m 1 0 CD1 .. m <CO O C b e- t. I C C7 cin � � � � O Z � rD c :/: Ir O cn O cn r;• !D = 2 „ I`� Z 0 ..+ ry ter L I I I I I H O co ca _.oo :12k pe CD ...L 4r. k CD I ® 0 ----;;;11:::-=4: II N CD — - s,G•,;, rn N 01 OMEI aJ CJ1Ca CO a II nCD CD = cl _ Ccrl CD � O 0 ''.„^^y Ciel r_sS .,2-- U1 T o �. co CO .xuTe C) a = CD m 4 C M - g D rd.) CD N :::. m cn CDin ..- ,.� CD a._,L, � JV ::._ CD :rte tin CD n '^ r\,) Q�CD xww.iiie 41. 3 W N !Gr R in CD IV a° 24,41",_' : co 41. a cn I I I I I I .,_.. 17 I C ' 'i Q IV Q C.)• A? W 0) IN CD Q. CD Y CL - x ll{ {I 1 moi! �::�'r.�: •� WA, - .: ,V/ '` ij xX il z ' c"lbotsrz � u -4 `„ 1'..--. I CD 11) II xrxx X� X j a -,:::',: las `. \ , 0 mi CL _ I CO 0 CL CD Cu �, a. x< u; ,. y x CO cp Yx>'xxz�cxx� r 10 o y0 CO '' 3.'Y�X'kk --=- W C ,..r. `,; . CD CD C CD m ' I CD (J) m a 05 .. .,....-:::-.7i."; n?IV7 C �"� �g 3! _11 • -:�,--4,�is ,,i, �,•cr NWe `�7"'�6^F co o N ,- cn II r • o cu0. 4 C) CSD CD N i CD O C cnI I * ...-1. — i 1 D r 0 0 CO 0 0 0 C. CDC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) f I 1 I 1 ( 1 I . I I I { 0 ' . ' �' . i2-m;: �... :2 "^.n^ ri%".'',".•2i dmi ir.} ;W,^YSG•-*% X.y• W ,iS, ...�� s--rrx' •L5 .7 CD `.'ri%s?sk 'scxti yvv9 ... ..?.."'x".N: CD CD CD W - C c = .P N O c' = CD fl: CL. W to cm rD a:. CD Cl t os s= C co y !► C� tD = I cm 0o V V so a' N 0 1:0 N V CJS C.Tr < CD Imi / 0 0m `, WO 0 a CD �. 'i< o C) Q DCC •11 = CD Cl) UI 1 m „ D be, m X = !� 11 -� z CDD a. O rn s : CD D x a 00 "V C rn W a GL m II N V ,-+ N Q = rt E m O C!i `^. �P = - CD - til -t -' (D C) O co `: OCC Co CD II N I m X 'C CD N W W W CD 0 Cm W V O CD L0 :4, x V C1 O+, , c -s co CD CD I cok I • z CD C7 c ' n H rn O r O GA 0-I r) Cf rD ►-t Z cn •►-4 Z i y O W a y N 0. O C� 'j ko z n ''' W t fir• r. j rD Q. W CD CI 0 CD cn o n . —I n C � r.:;: b9 CD� 0` co as Li) 0Of rD vo o . c� Cr 'i1 v, o v, a D Cl) o 0 0 o N to::: a� P4 i 'YF v C D rD ' rD Cr m 0 s.,CD W 'o o\ OA CO O V) vii 0 �ClM 0 11) y = X O • a 0 0 0 0 0 V.+ 1.0 CD CD I- r Cr b4 A N r-. u O ►- s O\ .-. W O ...4, 0 F aN VV -f CmCmCn 03 N O 0 O O O 0 O O 1 I CO I CO CL Cr CI ,M- 'b t•-.. •-" ric '2'-I... -...,.....,:',---t— .,,...�Cr- '@QS .. T_ . ,..'c...,..:7444.- : enne.?.r:, c ati •;r-n. Eii Va � .N.K1.7 �1' "— Al ��yycc �' .t K.^' ^':f >32,-..?:!c.. S✓ .=r :cam_-7S .,....._. t� ��.. :nzr,.�: • ^ 4a‘‘‘ • " r 1 -,7 V ' • • 0 C •� 'fie :.,'AR- ...�•:,.^�-?alt, 94..:- -.1. .... ,. 2 :ffi 2 ;;;;;-.: -->c66,..--4P +'yu>i&^". .... ,^^'his^s w T III "f1 r.,� ti'a V) I :.2 0 fk ., 0 I •'-7^7.^.7.-F.,; ; 0 113 C)• ^_: : m rrax- 7J M i _ , :Y�cr;til, ,..r CP '1 xa,T� -; Cl' II CD '..Y.>...Y�9-..•, tn i. � f..:'n sir]:' r �7 .,.�fir.;:, IIr.... 0 I . r^ V/ ... 1 _ - •�0 V CD CDIIIg II 1 1 j N C.0 (J P 0 b 0 0 S § S b b -0 bi 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I 1 I 1 I ttp. .�.z V• •\fir \ ^t^_.•::r 1. _a.ii.--' _.. =....A ...L 0 O = CT CO 1 53 ..i . . M \ O CD Q' to ?'', \. — :ise- ,__- „,,-,:.;., \ CD 0 pC12 r.i.-• .'I-T-111 -.i::: ..... 4 . 0 n• C Co C,DM1 \• p CD CD : ra x I O ;.x-: N CJ O eN 0 ..:.-z a-4L-L..,\Y \ CD -s-° . \ c CD I O O : 0 O CO N \ \ Q. O 0 tit A ,;g O N >: O I I o C CD K w 0 mrn �CD � � � � � XI rn � O � DO wog .,,< = N0 c = c ..-:�)thd Q 0 t.� xn. C K 33 - _- t. .rte- .�ri'3intinnv a^ -.•2� = CD Cn, 1 _ i-: t �:^'S ti. �^�2,n�.-, . /alb' a.l •ms �`� 3,�.�. c (.0 /� 1V smi X. -:�J.-^F.:,,.. tr ".-.='=,-==:"-- -- ,�*`T co c I'll - •• 2.-•--...7.:----------- --,---.." "*"...t,"-4,"F"--- 2 0 o N N Ci) o m •W N 0 0 N c ni Cr"v Q rrr N v 0 C) O ■• 4 1 1 I I 0 > < Z N n A N = 1:) rn2) C ® � o a I rnM 71 cr) I co o 0 . c� o CT CC CD 73 cn 1 w' - tC t!JC O x Mil ...— „,'47x,.16. C.agar CD a. Xr:? cs: CO —CID � t�_ --� rn W :sem �4. x: A •---•••--:-: • ------::-",:t: _ _..'-,••-..,-.:* -.J. g > CO 63 n = � : N.) --ri r ri. g 2 \ _- _ _ _ ___ _-:-_-:-:,...-It., - -t I.--•--_-_-__:•,•_•.....___r_- __ _ T ��.cam.. ___ -_ -. -_______- C `_. coo U) ci, C 0 SU ®;6 _. - O W CSD _ ..-2.--.....,..-,-------- m w co 0 4•-, '-'- -------- (D,---. 0 i o OD -I. 0 I- r I 5 _ a DOCn t [ 1 o • I I 10 b Date : 6/21/94 Memo To: Shakopee City Council From: Citizens Committee for Representative Government, Marjorie Henderson, Chairperson. Subject : Proposed Phase 1, and Phase 11, Community Center The Shakopee Citizens Committee for Representative Government respectfully requests the Shakopee City Council enters into a binding agreement with the voters of this community to: 1 . Provide the following information to the Shakopee voters before the ballot question on the $4, 000, 000 . 00 phase 11 proposed community recreation center and before spending any of the six million dollars on Phase 1 : (a) Provide the voters with the total project costs of both Phase 1 and Phase 11 . (b) Provide the voters with the total cost of operation of Phase 1 & 11 upon completion. (c) Provide the voters with the total anticipated revenue after completion and in operation of the proposed Shakopee Community Center which includes both phases. This projection will have to be based on an unbiased market study. (d) Identify all of the services that will be available to the users of this facility (both Phase 1 & Phase 11) . (e) Provide the voters with the anticipated yearly tax obligation for a range of house values within the City of Shakopee and, the yearly anticipated tax obligation for a range of values for commercial/industrial properties within the City of Shakopee as a result of both Phase 1 & Phase 11 . 2 . Award no bids and spend none of the six million dollars of the Phase 1 proposed Community Center until these questions have been answered except for the required survey costs associated with obtaining the above information. 3 . Provide a clear and concise ballot question regarding the proposed Phase 11, four million dollar recreation center with no other proposed projects tied to it . 4 . Agree not to proceed with the six million dollar Phase 1 project if the four million dollar proposed Phase 11 recreation center fails in referendum. /G C PRESS RELEASE June 21, 1994 To: Shakopee Valley News From: Shakopee Citizens for Representative Government/CCFT Subject: Petition Site in Shakopee for Referendum Shakopee, Minnesota - June 21, 1994 The Shakopee Citizens Committee for Representative Government and the CCFT have rented the building at 126 South Holmes Street (directly across from the Shakopee City Hail ) . This building will be used as a petition site for those Shakopee registered voters who have not yet been contacted to sign the petition being circulated regarding Phase I of the proposed recreation center. This petition states that the undersigned registered voters request the City Council enter into a binding agreement that the $6,000,000 Phase I will NOT be built if the additional $4,000,000 Phase II fails a proposed referendum question in November. This site will be open from 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. on Friday, July 8, 1994 and Saturday, July 9, 1994. all(OF SHAKOPEE JUN 2 1 1994 0 liik Ind CONSENT „ , , „IpRogury: „., ,,ii, :_ I A 0 .,,lelifilb71 :14 Dear Elected Official : We are writing this letter as concerned fellow City Council Members as a City Member of the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (L.M.C. I .T. ) . We are asking for your consideration and support on a matter that has gone on for much too long and has sapped the resources of each of the three involved City Council Members . We believe, and the Minnesota Court of Appeals agrees that City Council Members should be entitled to reasonable legal defense coverage thru the L.M.C. I .T. . The attorneys for the L .M.C. I .T. disagree and have chosen to add to all parties expense and Appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court . This action was brought in November of 1991 in regard to a June emergency discussion to repair a well in the Afton City Park prior to the Fourth of July celebration. The original complaint alleged that the Mayor violated the open meeting law with two Council Members on three separate and unrelated occasions . The complaint asked that the statutory penalty be imposed ($100) and that the Mayor and the two involved Council Members be removed from office. An elected official can be removed from office for three violations of the open meeting law. The courts have found only one unintentional violation and no evidence of any other open meeting law violations . In their defense the three City Council Members have incurred over $60 ,000 in legal expenses . The Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled on March 8 , 1994 that the L.M. C. I .T. has a duty to defend and ordered them to do so. L.M.C. I .T. attorneys have chosen to Appeal the charge to the Minnesota Supreme Court . All around Minnesota Communities thought in joining the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust they would receive legal defense coverage. The Court of Appeals says they should! In Afton, a single citizens effort to remove a Mayor and two City Council Members from public office has failed. The cost of survivory on their Public Offices is $60 ,000 to the involved Council Members . This is the type of event that is extraordinary, beyond budget and one for which cities purchase insurance. At least Afton thought it had purchased such insurance. City of Afton — 3033 St. Croix Trail So. Box 386; Afton, MN. 55001 We are enclosing a Resolution that would direct the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance trust to comply with the Appeals Court decision. We ask that you place this matter on your City Councils agenda at the earliest possible date and show your support for Afton or your concern for the issue by passing the attached resolution and forwarding a copy to the L.M.C. I .T. and the City of Afton. We thank you for your time and consideration on this matter . Respectfully, a i Charlotte Farago Daniel O'Neill Ward 3 Ward 4 Non-Litigants City of Afton RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to receive and file the correspondence from the City of Afton regarding the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court. CITY OF SHAKOPEE D JUN 6 1994 ft OF wg RESOLUTION 1994-11 CITY OF AFTON WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE LMCIT TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION REGARDING AFTON CITY OFFICIALS WHEREAS, elected City officials from the City of Afton have been in litigation since November, 1991 , and WHEREAS, this litigation has resulted in legal fees of approximately $60 , 000 , and WHEREAS , these fees are the result of defending their right to hold public office as elected officials , and WHEREAS, the District Court states that the defendants did not conspire to meet and the Court of Appeals states that their one violation was "within the reasonable and lawful performance of public duties" and the violation was "unintentional . . . an unfortunate misstep--a stumble-- while the appellants went about the performance of legitimate public services" , and WHEREAS, there was no personal benefit to these City officials , and WHEREAS, Afton is a member of the LMCIT pool , an insurance trust designed so that cities can help each other during times of unanticipated financial trouble, and WHEREAS, the Court of Appeals has ruled that this pool does offer coverage for defense of these types of minor violations , and WHEREAS, the LMCIT has now begun to offer insurance, at an additional premium to member cities , which specifically covers those situations already determined to be covered by the Court of Appeals decision, and WHEREAS, the LMCIT has appealed this Court of Appeals decision to the Minnesota Supreme Court , and WHEREAS, this appeal will cost the LMCIT and its member cities , and also the elected officials of Afton, considerable time, resources , and thousands of additional dollars , RESOLUTION 1994-11 PAGE 2 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF Afton that it direct the LMCIT to dismiss its appeal to the State Supreme Court, and to reimburse the elected officials from the City of Afton for their legal expenses resulting from litigation originating in November of 1994, BE IT ALSO RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be sent to LMCIT offices in St . Paul and to the City of Afton. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AFTON THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY, 1994. Daniel O'Neill , Councilmember Acting Chair ATTEST : L Alex Wikstrom, City Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: ',//14 /1Thomas J. o C ty Attorney 3490 Lexington Avenue North League of Minnesota Cities St. Paul, MN 55126-8044 June 15, 1994 Dear Fellow LMCIT member: Many of you recently received a letter from the City of Afton, asking you to urge the LMCIT Board of Trustees to drop a pending appeal and to reimburse three Afton council members for legal costs they incurred in defending themselves against the charges that they violated the open meeting law. A number of city officials have asked about this matter, so we thought it might be useful to outline how LMCIT has approached the issue and why. Three members of the Afton city council were charged with violating the open meeting law. The city submitted the claim under the city's LMCIT liability coverage, and LMCIT disclaimed coverage. The reason is that the LMCIT liability coverage provides that LMCIT will cover and provide a defense for claims seeking "damages" . The coverage document provides that "damages" does not include fines or penalties. This definition of "damages" was modeled after typical language found in commercial liability insurance policies. The open meeting law at the time provided for a $100 "civil penalty" , and for removal from office after three violations. Litigation under the open meeting law is therefor by definition an action seeking a penalty - not a claim for "damages. " Since it is not a claim for damages, LMCIT's position is and has always been that these defense costs are not covered by the LMCIT liability coverage. The council members sued LMCIT, challenging LMCIT's disclaimer of coverage. The trial court ruled that there was no coverage. The city officials appealed this ruling to the Court of Appeals, which ruled that there was coverage. The Appeals Court first ruled that the city had the legal authority to reimburse the officials' legal costs; and then simply said that because the city was authorized to reimburse the city officials for these costs, LMCIT was required to do so. We believe that the Court of Appeals decision is incorrect and misreads what the LMCIT liability coverage document actually says. LMCIT therefor asked the Supreme Court to review the Appeals Court's decision. The Supreme Court agreed to do so, and the appeal is proceeding. The City of Afton's letter suggests that LMCIT should drop this appeal and reimburse the city officials for their legal costs. But because LMCIT is a cooperative organization of cities, the AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 612)490-5600 1-800-925-1122 plus your city code TDD(612)490-9038 Fax 612)490-0072 funds which LMCIT uses to pay claims are really the joint property of all of LMCIT's member cities. The purpose of the coverage document is to spell out which claims will be paid with those funds. LMCIT therefor has a duty to all of its member cities to pay out those funds only in accordance with the coverage document, and to make sure that the coverage document is being properly interpreted. To pay a claim which we believe is excluded by the language of the coverage document would amount to using the member cities' funds to make a gift. This is not the first time LMCIT has found itself in the position of having to disclaim coverage for a member city's claim. The claims arising out of the alleged air quality problems in the City of Coon Rapids' ice arena several years ago, which fell under the coverage's "pollution" exclusion; and the recent claims against the member cities of the Minnesota Police Recruitment System, which fell under the "joint powers" exclusion, are two other examples. In both of those instances, the LMCIT Board reviewed the issues and developed ways to cover similar situations in the future - just as LMCIT has done by developing the optional open meeting law defense coverage that is now available. In short, we believe that in fairness to the member cities, LMCIT must continue to make coverage decisions based on what the coverage document actually says and what it actually covers - not on what we may later decide it should have said or should have covered. This appeal is simply one more step in the process that assures that the coverage document is being interpreted and applied correctly. The members of the LMCIT Board are very interested in hearing your views on this or any other issue involving LMCIT. Please feel free to contact any of the Trustees, or Pete Tritz or Tom Grundhoefer at the League office, with any comments, questions, or suggestions you may have. Si'cerely, 1,? Stene or, Lindstrom Chairman, LMCIT Board of Trustees ktls /old MURPHY'S LANDING Minnesota Valley Restoration Inc. A village of 1840-1890 2187 E. Highway 101 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone:(612)445-6901 Fax:(612)445-4174 (2e) June 13, 1994 Mr. Dennis Kraft City Administrator y o. :;re„ 129 1st. Ave. East Shakopee, Mn 55379 Dear Dennis: At the June 8, 1994 MVRP Board of Directors meeting, a motion was passed requesting the City of Shakopee to assist the Landing in the relocation of the East entrance drive. Currently this entrance is located in the center of the site. Visitors must enter the site and then turn right and drive approximately a quarter mile to the parking lot. This creates a problem on busy days with traffic flow and more importantly, makes it very difficult to limit access to the site to paying customers only. Through the donation of materials and volunteer labor, we have constructed a fence to separate the parking lot from the site. Our intent is to force visitors to go through the admissions barn to gain access. Your assistance in moving the driveway so it enters directly into the lot would be very helpful. This would involve installing a culvert and some loads of surface gravel. The planned location would be to enter from the existing service road. We would very much appreciate it if this request could be considered at the upcoming council meeting. Please contact me if you have further questions. Thank-you or your consideration. Shirley A. Olso Executive Director Staff will prepare the estimate costs to do this work and will have it available at the Council meeting . ACTION REQUESTED : Discuss this request and provide staff with direction . 1 1 MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City-Hamimstrator FROM: Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner RE: Vacation of a portion of the two 20 Foot Wide Drainage and Utility Easements Located between Lot 4 and Lot 5, Block 1, Valley Park 6th Addition DATE: June 15, 1994 INTRODUCTION: The City has received a petition from Ashland Oil, Inc. for the vacation of a portion of the two 20 foot wide drainage and utility easements located on the east and west side of the original lot line between Lot 4 and Lot 5, Block 1, Valley Park 6th Addition. The City Council will hold a public hearing on June 21, 1994, to consider this vacation request. At their meeting on June 9, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended the vacation of the southerly 178 feet of the two existing 20 foot wide (40 foot total) drainage and utility easements located along the lot line between Lot 4 and Lot 5, Block 1, Valley Park 6th Addition to the City Council, while also recommending that the vacation be contingent upon the recording of a new 40 foot wide (20 feet on each side) drainage and utility easement along the new lot line. BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of the zoning map showing the location of Lot 4 and Lot 5, Block 1, Valley Park 6th Addition. (See Exhibit A.) Valley Park 6th Addition was platted in 1979. Also attached is a portion of the original Valley Park 6th Addition plat which shows the location of the portion of the existing drainage and utility easement that is being proposed for vacation. (See Exhibit B.) The portion of the easement that is being considered for vacation is that part of the two 20 foot wide easements lying 178 feet to the north of a point beginning 20 feet north of the southern lot lines of Lot 4 and Lot 5, Block 1, Valley Park 6th Addition. There is 20 feet of easement on each side of the lot line between Lot 4 and Lot 5. The Planning Commission has recommended that the existing 20 foot wide easement width (total of 40 feet) be relocated along the proposed lot line, instead of the 5 foot wide easement originally proposed by the applicant (for total of 10 feet). Both the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (SPUC) and the Engineering Department have commented that a 10 foot wide easement would not be of sufficient width. Staff has been in contact with the applicant, and the applicant is in agreement with the 40 foot easement recommendations. DISCUSSION: This request is being made in order to relocate the easements along a new lot line that is in the process of being approved through the Minor Subdivision process. The approval of the Minor Subdivision will move the southern 203 feet of the existing lot line approximately 163 feet to the west. The approval for this Minor Subdivision will be contingent upon the vacation of the 1 portion of the existing drainage and utility easements between the lots, and the dedication of new drainage and utility easements adjacent to the new lot line. For a better understanding of the result of this vacation, the City Council may want to refer to the attached Exhibits C, D and E. These exhibits provide the following illustrations: Exhibit C: 1. Shows the location of the original lot line between Lot 4 and Lot 5, Block 1, as it was platted with Valley Park 6th Addition in 1985. 2. Shows the location of the portion of the existing 40 foot wide (20 feet on each side of the lot line) drainage and utility easement which is being proposed for vacation. Exhibit D: 1. Shows the location of the new lot line which is in the process of being approved through the Minor Subdivision process. This new lot line is proposed to be located approximately 163 feet west of the original lot line between Lot 4 and Lot 5. 2. Easement Originally Proposed by Applicant: Shows the proposed location of the new 10 foot wide drainage and utility easement along the new lot line (5 feet on each side of the lot line), as originally proposed by the applicant. 3. Easement Recommendation by Staff: Shows the recommended location of a new 40 foot wide drainage and utility easement along the new lot line (20 feet on each side of the lot line), as recommended by City staff, and agreed to by the applicant. Exhibit E: 1. Shows the result of the proposed vacation, and the location of the two required easements. Provides the current location of the lot line and the location of the recommended 40 foot wide drainage and utility easement. Both the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (SPUC) and the City Engineering Department have commented that the 5 foot wide easement as proposed by the applicant (for total of 10 feet) would not be sufficient. They recommend that the existing 20 foot wide easement width (total of 40 feet) be relocated along the proposed lot line. The applicant is in agreement with this requirement. 2 The 1990 draft Comprehensive Plan has designated the area for industrial development. This land use category allows a variety of light and heavy industrial activities such as assembly, warehousing, wholesale distribution and sales, manufacturing, research and development, and office activities. Commercial activities would not be allowed unless specifically mentioned in the zoning districts which implement this land use plan category. Housing is not allowed. The Shakopee Planning Commission has determined that the vacation of the portion of this drainage and utility easement, and the dedication of a two 20 foot wide easements along the new lot line, would not be in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Vacate the southerly 178 feet of the two existing 20 foot wide (40 foot total) drainage and utility easements located along the lot line between Lot 4 and Lot 5, Block 1, Valley Park 6th Addition to the City Council, contingent upon the recording of a new 40 foot wide (20 feet on each side) drainage and utility easement along the new lot line. 2. Vacate the southerly 178 feet of the two existing 20 foot wide (40 foot total) drainage and utility easements along the lot line between Lot 4 and Lot 5, Block 1, Valley Park 6th Addition to the City Council, contingent upon the recording of a new 10 foot wide (5 feet on each side) drainage and utility easement along the new lot line. 3. Deny the request to vacate the southerly 178 feet of the two existing 20 foot wide drainage and utility easements. 4. Continue the public hearing to allow staff or the applicant to provide additional information. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has recommended Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4023, A Resolution Vacating the Two Existing 20 Foot Wide (40 Foot Total) Drainage and Utility Easements lying 178 feet to the North of a Point Beginning 20 feet North of the Southern Lot Lines between Lot 4 and Lot 5, Block 1, Valley Park 6th Addition, and move its adoption. {crrYCOUNWACASHLA.ici} 3 EXIiIBIT A • A r 1 • 'ire . 81: • ---------T T �\ • • • 12 SuJECT SITE >s,... �,, 4.; , III -------1 ' --r--- 8 • 1 / , m �--� uTM I "'' Alt/ATx L • it_______ u ........4. 1 __ . r 11L—Nir---"Ngr1 AG AGRICULTURE . R 1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL �E� k R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL 140 R3 MID-DENSITY RES. R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. LAKE B 1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS ' •- • B2 COMMUNITY BUSINESS I 41) B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS i 11 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 12 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL S S SHORELAND FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT •ATORY PUD AG j :. ) •MAND . RTD RACETRACK DISTRICT' -.� -= .,-� :. �1 .: - ` Zoning Map - -. -- City of SHAKOPE•E - c.•o'_�+c..SJ' _'- rt49-�•_l :.---..2-2.1.4 -",i•6,42 2t-L.x,�l I .....jr......... _L�-- ------ , -.i_zs1 .,O,5`:c' f4 . I. nd Z .: • II ' '.4 A 3 + 'I yy . . '' W . _•,01 O 1 1 ~ "' QI i . I IBMI - 6C66,-__ 11 I .. I r - I + O*z'90 Qin _�' I I ' Meiii. :::-1 - III I 1 .• I I I I = ' I I in I CI `�• I r / 1' •o< c-; tv LCT ly• II. Y• I ' Jr o I 1 I > I 0 c >1.1.11 I•Z I 1 t. ,� MM I _ , M+y `:� I I I El X — Ti- - � �- • _ __ 6L66b___ I ��I in i l I •: ,t�'`• - *:"t : Ulli) „ tt JI I I i t •~` r Z •- ... 1 • I • ' MNcO`O ! .Er �+ I• 1 • , 1 • `i , .-` •y./ L^I - ; . tlv I I 1 �.I. �� . r- 11 1 -.' •4144A I I •se', I Ohill iiA 3-$29051 3----l z ` • I1I1NoO PI- r.1WWQdw C ;= ___ . _..--__-7_". -62:- C 4 1:4 >111 , ,--- .......„,„„„;;;,,,. _ -� � I I � � � ;� 0 A C �- i+ CC) y IP- c40, to O 1v 0 11E1 in I f � s� g 0 ;----- : .t, I �., = , ��' 3-$2.90,gIN I ` - A` o+•r2.+• Ii.; I «b , of '„n • �'�_ ��� • �o 410111 r. fN• � t....---f` C0' LOr+ ' /--- ,iI 5• ` w 10 • M.°deZ: AN' I k(1.\(% V •MSIN' \ kW/AM . , '..`::‘, '' `...\\`‘.,',..‘ •.\\.. . \ 1:..t I 1 \ \ \ • W i • -4- ` z \ I I a. . 4�\ O \\ \ \B \ I I; �- \ ` ` , i i\ \ \ U o \ w 1 IxI . !�w7z \ - \ . \ � .-;•\ i t \ . \. \ I _ ' y -• . Ow4-, . I i • ti ., .i g \ oaO I i yI I • itl ..11 I \ \ t• i - 1 -!I*' {\1 {r _ si a• "'..;r i.. s!‘f. ...) 4 - �t=;. 1 \,. $ r..- 12—\01-1-\"-0- LI tiii"). • P 4- t 1 \ i 1 Xty.i.Y1.1 s-• l• A I'''' / \*/ .� '�,, 'ice / ! a v. 1.J ��� r �. .YOB ..� _=I t ? �,���]] 1 ISI I It -.-/-- `.��- i - J . -,- •' 1 G • ill : j .. ti i L> as ..c. t' l 144 I j' I " I -• ) J c-r f I rc I ; 1 r I i o- 1 1 ' • I _ ._ / , - • 6[46* 3.►Z.90.SIN ) I •1i I ._I EXHIBIT D — — -.-.�-•— — - _--r-_ice—t't-- ..:.i r —'`..';:-_ /•• •1 ;- - ‘\ PROPOSAL BY APPLICANT - _ /// ` 1 _' > / may' .-• ' • .1;;j., ;_< II) 7:7:: -27--is'.71-=.:\ .-----4,. .,... I •-• , v- . / ,., , ,,,.. ,,, . • ' G yah .,7 r;`• ;�•^:.��..1 . +.�: I ; --'`- i- \- 'i; �YY1 „. R. .. Q P }'\ ,. LOCATION OF PROPOSED IL 1; ."'\ .10' WIDE EASEMENT TI:IeI -: each side of lot line) I ,, t'....,,•7n �5' wide easement on L �j �\` IIi lF -PROPOSED LOT LINE _ • r lig, - .. . - _~ :;;�ray --. _ - _ - - - - - - - _ __=-c_ . r — _^• _///rte .. . - 1 . 1,.;t- RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF , r. - I ' I 1 >;"%r ; ,( I i1- 's ---------\),....i / Tom;' P . •�'` ..'� .WCATIO O RECOMMENDED I //, I Q `yY ..`- .J, 11 - r` :-.-140' WIDE EASEMENT I11 - 1I I • ' Gs( 20' wide easement on each side of lot line); `. r' , b. , I11 ~: ` <-- PROPOSED LOT LINE i�' 11" d► ;u _.. _ —V - - i. _r' ..i.N JOIASTA AL <�OUI EV-ARo '` ... 'SOUTH-,' • _ VAI I•FY •' RESOLUTION NO. 4023 A RESOLUTION VACATING THE TWO EXISTING 20 FOOT WIDE (40 FOOT TOTAL) DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS LYING 178 FEET TO THE NORTH OF A POINT BEGINNLNG 20 FEET NORTH OF THE LOT LINE BETWEEN LOT 4 AND LOT 5, BLOCK 1, VALLEY PARK 6TH ADDITION WHEREAS, two 499.79 foot long by 20 foot wide drainage and utility easements have been dedicated along the original lot line between Lot 4 and Lot 5, Block 1, Valley Park 6th Addition; and WHEREAS, it has been made to appear to the Shakopee City Council that the aforementioned drainage and utility easements serve no public use or interest; and WHEREAS, the public hearing to consider the action to vacate was held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall in the City of Shakopee at 7:00 P.M. on the 21st day of June, 1994; and WHEREAS, two weeks published notice has been given in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and posted notice has been given by posting such notice on the bulletin board on the main floor of the Scott County Courthouse, the bulletin board at the U.S. Post Office, the bulletin board at the Shakopee Public Library, and the bulletin board in the Shakopee City Hall; and WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard on the matter were given an opportunity to be heard at the public hearing in the Council Chambers in the City of Shakopee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, Mi NESOTA: 1.) That it finds and determines that the vacation hereinafter described is in the public interest; 2.) That the two existing 20 foot wide (40 foot total) drainage and utility easements lying 178 feet to the north of a point beginning 20 feet north of the southern lot line between Lot 4 and Lot 5, Block 1, Valley Park 6th Addition, serve no further public need; 3.) That all that part of the two 20 foot wide drainage and utility easements lying 178 feet to the north of a point beginning 20 feet north of the southern lot lines of Lot 4 and Lot 5 (20 feet wide on each lot), Block 1, Valley Park 6th Addition Scott County, Minnesota, be, and the same hereby is vacated; 4.) That the approval of this vacation is contingent upon the recording of two new 20 foot wide drainage and utility easements along the new lot line (20 feet wide on each side of the new lot line) to be approved through the Minor Subdivision process and located approximately 163 feet west of the original lot line between Lot 4 and Lot 5, Block 1, Valley Park 6th Addition; and 5.) After the adoption of the Resolution, the City Clerk shall file certified copies hereof with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Scott County. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney W Emil v I ,, . • ' N: \�\\ 11PM 1 I \ \ t .. .L 1YM / 1 \ I - `� ` , \ .\y\+ ! \\ t //— t\ t\ I «\e 1 i ,1x i / I t \ \ \i •\ •\ \ I r i L t I ... i•. N. \\ \ \\ \ A .w` 1 \ \ \ 1 I"• I • � ,I�. \ ••, \ \\ \ 1nil I. I ,� � 1 \ \ . _ '. i Yg- sa5 02 C) �` ` ` I \ CO A r1 .s. \ • \ I 1 1 t t W 1' .I ilk \\ __, ' \ .� `" \\i , I i .4;•'t-i-s.l11 \ _. Q i. ., .., 1 a . . \t A w y is \ �\ ti 1 / 1 � � t �:. 1�1 «a t \ t 41. \ii .=1 I1 p' '" I i .� „ 1 \,., 1 _ t r 1 tQ t �t 1 } -I 1 t U I. . . i, - ......!......,..-^•••-l•i',..4,,,,%-.5'' :I:N lj gn.V51 r. ..\64°XI. Zi ‘)( CC1' C4 • 111"' tr /'!�• :4 i 'n.+o u• Sc • (1). t. 8• 115.�.. \ ✓ .° / _. �` E ' i t \J ,, t I. \\ Ii' t fit, \It [V]. \c \..i \. sl, fs.lie`, _ _-1:, - , r -2..1 2 II ao I l) wI � tIlb .. I f 1 ' t tlty Q W It . ' 10 .ys / --ie• . i . ��; tZ ,.‘...i I kI ..?ic: :,; \ 1 .>- W r`� b • L> Ifsa I I Fi • v `�'' 1t 1 1 r is 1 \�) i'4- I I '= I « t I • 1 I 1 I \ ,� 1 3.,Z,90.S I N - • 6C66,1 I n ; G\-- JUN 16 '94 11:02 FROM ASHLAND OIL INC. TO 916124456718 PAGE.002 mallIMMIhr Ashland gmlummow AMA-AND OIL,iNC. • POST OCE BOX 14000 • LEXINGTON,KENTUCKY 40512 • PHONE(606)264-7777 CORPORATE REAL ESTATE DEPARTMENT VIA FACSIMILE June 16, 1994 Ms. Terri Sandbeck Assistant City Planner City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street, South Shakopee, MN 553794351 RE: Minor Subdivision Ashland Oil, Inc. Property Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Valley Park Sixth Addition Shakopee, Scott County, MN Dear Terri: Pursuant to your letter of June 1, 1994, the City of Shakopee has approved Ashland's request for Minor subdivision on the referenced property contingent upon (1) the vacation of a portion of the existing drainage and utility easements located adjacent to the lot line that is being relocated, which vacation request will be considered at the public hearing on June 21, 1994 and (2) the dedication by Ashland of two new 20 foot wide (total of 40 feet wide) drainage and utility easements along the new lot line. This letter shall confirm that Ashland will grant the City of Shakopee a 40 foot wide easement along the new lot line. The standard form of easement forwarded with your letter of June 1, 1994 is acceptable to Ashland. Although you may not receive the easement from Ashland by the June 21, 1994 public hearing date, the agreement is being processed and will be forwarded to your attention as soon as it is completed. JUN-16-1994 11:03 P.82 JUN 16 '94 1102 FROM ASHLAND OIL INC. TO 916124456718 PAGE.003 Pursuant to my discussion with Mr. Joe Adams with Shakopee Public Utilities, it will not be necessary for Ashland to rededicate the underground electrical service easement which is in place and providing service to Ashland's existing facility on Lot 5. We appreciate the City of Shakopee's cooperation and please feel free to contact me at 606/357-7362 if you have any questions. Sincerely, /A ' 7 ' Bonnie R. Dawson Senior Real Estate Representative Enclosure cc: H. R. Crome J. A. Duquin T. D. Maconachy W. R. Palmer T. P. Sullivan L. R.Wells J. D. Williams ** TOTAL PAGE.003 ** JUN-16-1994 11:03 92e P.03 1 c. MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner RE: Vacation of the two 10 Ten Foot Wide Drainage and Utility Easements Located Adjacent to the Original Lot Line between Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, Century Plaza Square 3rd Addition DATE: June 15, 1994 INTRODUCTION: The City has received a petition from Murray Williamson and Associates, Inc. for the vacation of the two 298.61 foot long by 10 foot wide drainage and utility easements located north and south of the original lot line between Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, Century Plaza Square 3rd Addition. The City Council will hold a public hearing on June 21, 1994, to consider this vacation request. At their meeting on June 9, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this vacation request. BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of the zoning map showing the location of Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, Century Plaza Square 3rd Addition. (See Exhibit A.) Century Plaza Square 3rd Addition was platted in 1985. Also attached is a portion of the original Century Plaza Square 3rd Addition plat which shows the location of the existing drainage and utility easement that is being proposed for vacation. (See Exhibit B.) The portion of the easement that is being considered for vacation is 298.61 feet long and 20 feet wide (10 feet on each side of the lot line between Lot 2 and Lot 3). DISCUSSION: This request is being made in order to relocate the easements along a new lot line that was approved through the Minor Subdivision process. The approval of the Minor Subdivision moved the lot line 20.45 feet south of the original lot line. This approval was contingent upon the vacation of the existing drainage and utility easements between the lots, and the dedication of new drainage and utility easements adjacent to the new lot line (10' of easement on each side of the new lot line). For a better understanding of the result of this vacation, the City Council may want to refer to the attached Exhibits C and D. 1 EXHIBIT C . \.- 0--1-- DRwt N \\--oa: NiluRi�� W1Li_ 1ANASoo,.1 4,, lssoc,,, \'J. "..... i Eg S'rR 4 STQw M+w Bt°u E •;+r � • -- -,i(v•c)2 N09°5( . 5%‘E.: -- - �\ 17- - -� I c I • itv i J 1I / 1 lu J. N '< /;;7 - N • r Cr: �G. w cr U �' (2-\ 'sc ��, �� I w I es� 35 E I I: 3t�,.�t tJ 85 - - -' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT o -. a PROPOSED FOR VACATION I ..:.:.:::77:71:::-.7.:777:77.: ...-:- —-... -7 7- , PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITYI •otrt t►7Ii o i►.o oei,t 20 • ` s'ilI EASEMENT LOCATION - I r c1 - 10 NEW LOT LINE APPROVED L $ i4' N4.-.,• X WITH MINOR SUBDIVISION 19 ��OrThff-I V I ,<71?` N / I 3t9.91 N89°510 35..a -- • • zr l , = ( ,_ Q...Q.,_k__ e0ScQeUnch E0��� I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a drawing of the following described property: Parcel A: That part of Lot 3, Block 1, CENTURY PLAZA SQUARE 3RD ADDITION, Scott County. • Minnesota, lying: southerly of the north 20.45 feet ( as ',ensured at right nngles to the north line).. Parcel B: Lot.2 and the north 20.45 feet (aalaesaured at right angles to the north line) of Lot 3, Block 1, CENTURY PLAZA SQUARE 3RD ADDITION, Scott County, Minnesota. That I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated: November 3, 19931 , / . X Qi 4 V • Allan R. Hastings Minnesota Registration No. 17009 121 Lewis Street S. ' Suite No. 102 Shakopee,.Minnesota Phone 612 445-4027 Exhibit C: 1. Shows the location of the original lot line between Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, as it was platted with Century Plaza Square 3rd Addition in 1985. 2. Shows the location of the existing 298.61 long by 20 foot wide (10 feet on each side of the lot line) drainage and utility easement which is being proposed for vacation. 3. Shows the location of the new lot line which was approved through the Minor Subdivision process. This new lot line is 20.45 feet south of the original lot line between Lot 2 and Lot 3. 4. Shows the proposed location of the new 298.61 long by 20 foot wide drainage and utility easement along the new lot line. Exhibit D: 1. Shows the result of the proposed vacation. Provides the current location of the lot line and the location of the proposed drainage and utility easement. Shakopee Public Utilities (SPUC) has commented that with this vacation, the applicant's point of electrical service may have to be relocated at the applicant's cost. The applicant should contact SPUC regarding additional information on this issue. All other utility companies have recommended approval of this vacation request. The 1990 draft Comprehensive Plan has designated the area for commercial development. This land use category allows retail and service businesses which sell primarily to individual customers, but not to other businesses (wholesale trade). It does not include manufacturing, warehousing, trucking, or businesses which utilize extensive outdoor storage of goods or materials. The Planning Commission has determined that the vacation of the portion of this drainage and utility easement, and the dedication of an easement along the new lot line, would not be in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Vacate the existing 298.61 foot long by 20 foot wide drainage and utility easement along the original lot line between Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, Century Plaza Square 3rd Addition, contingent upon the recording of a new 298.61 long by 20 foot wide drainage and utility easement along the new lot line. 2 2. Deny the request to vacate the existing 298.61 long by 20 foot wide drainage and utility easement. 3. Continue the public hearing to allow staff or the applicant to provide additional information. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has recommended Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4024, A Resolution Vacating the 298.61 foot long by 20 foot wide Drainage and Utility Easement Located Adjacent to the Original Lot Line Between Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, Century Plaza Square 3rd Addition, Subject to the Recording of a new 298.61 Foot Long by 20 Foot Wide Drainage and Utility Easement Along the new Lot Line, and move its adoption. {CRYCOUNIVACEASME.621} 3 RESOLUTION NO. 4024 A RESOLUTION VACATING THE 298.61 FOOT LONG BY 20 FOOT WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE ORIGINAL LOT LINE BETWEEN LOT 2 AND LOT 3, BLOCK 1, CENTURY PLAZA SQUARE 3RD ADDITION, SUBJECT TO THE RECORDING OF A NEW 298.61 FOOT LONG BY 20 FOOT WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE NEW LOT LINE WHEREAS, a 298.61 foot long by 20 foot wide drainage and utility easement has been dedicated adjacent to the original lot line between Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, Century Plaza Square 3rd Addition; and WHEREAS, it has been made to appear to the Shakopee City Council that the aforementioned drainage and utility easement serves no public use or interest; and WHEREAS, the public hearing to consider the action to vacate was held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall in the City of Shakopee at 7:00 P.M. on the 21st day of June, 1994; and WHEREAS, two weeks published notice has been given in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and posted notice has been given by posting such notice on the bulletin board on the main floor of the Scott County Courthouse, the bulletin board at the U.S. Post Office, the bulletin board at the Shakopee Public Library, and the bulletin board in the Shakopee City Hall; and WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard on the matter were given an opportunity to be heard at the public hearing in the Council Chambers in the City of Shakopee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1.) That it finds and determines that the vacation hereinafter described is in the public interest; 2.) That the 298.61 foot long by 20 foot wide drainage and utility easement that was dedicated adjacent to the original lot line between Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, Century Plaza Square 3rd Addition (10 feet on each side of the lot line) serves no further public need; 3.) That all that part of the 298.61 foot long by 20 foot wide drainage and utility easement lying to the east of a point beginning 10 feet east of the western lot lines of Lot 2 and Lot 3 (10 feet wide on each lot), Block 1, Century Plaza Square 3rd Addition Scott County, Minnesota, be, and the same hereby is vacated; 4.) That the approval of this vacation is contingent upon the recording of a new 298.61 long by 20 foot wide drainage and utility easement (10 feet wide on each side of the new lot line) along the new lot line to be located 20.45 feet south of the original lot line which was approved through the Minor Subdivision process; and 5.) After the adoption of the Resolution, the City Clerk shall file certified copies hereof with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Scott County. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney • EXHIBIT A ii 4.;‘0011-0..A.,,,iga4,� ir ;d • , /.A. -. .--- \______._-___. �I til - - SII ���;� ,111 ally _ i I i Q 1111111110114 i ;g SI" r a�11�a. oill _ 1 ; 1 .11 awog - ` I i ' 1- IMO ilist: i 1E Mill 1111 ' .r.... iiii ,„,„, A . . • 0 . I ibit_ �- . . >< SUBJECT SITE I ,., ,.••„.•„•„•„•:,•„•„•„•„•,•. L ®g _ lI � rill, ., nil. ; inn hili , i _ _ / i I , III ' !____. I : IT \ i in rr 312 ' L.3:9 \ 1 , 1 • \ - __ - AG AGRICULTURE ,. , k % ' ' i r� - --_ __ R1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL �, 1 ,__;__ . ' • \ R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL - r'" 3 -- y R3 MID-DENSITY RES. ! 17I 3 ' R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. .- '' r-4 B1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS - -.1. ' IT B2 COMMUNITY BUSINESS --2---s- —7 F. _ ~s B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS 1- —S - = _ - ' -•x '• t• _ _ .t. I 1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL =�- '-=- _+ _ — 12 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL >/::,4 _z . ' _ .A.WECIN KM. S SHORELAND ›; ° `=, - FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT --H?)-;:-.. .: -•-•• MANDATORY PUD -- -�--'- ----- RTD RACETRACK DISTRICT-- __ _ _ � _-- Zoning Map City of SHAKOPEE r_`_ ___ EXHIBIT B T I1 1,f, . i 3 i3 4 • -r• i ,-/ - I •-- . 0% 1 .1 _,_ 110: `i \9 -_: Z a � La_ O a '.` <, .: LJ L -- /'✓89°5G ' 35'E * 3/6. 92 1 0 IN i! _a szN , h `10 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT N8 9'56'35"E FOR VACATION .,. . ... . : :�... PROPOSED _ ........ SUBJECT SITE (10' ON EACH SIDE OF LOT LINE) : : ::::: : :3/B / c'f • 4.•_ 3 Z L_ + �t/59`)5�'35'E ± g/9. 97 C CO .r a , - o : 0 o jSO 46 % - 4 - , 11.1N I S em..`- 242/. 68 I2?7.39 581°58'56W' EXHIBIT D •. WLLOD / mall (p c. 1- ,, t\,c i EKwcttl(. aTwv�tAt•t- • ,tt,..,...,,,,.....,,,t•..«.,.jJ/...,.«.... -• -- 3%(o.c)Z N ')'"5(.1 ".,5"L - • d: 11 • c� i l'1 Ja1 / btu N Ir2 N °s ; 4.\../ al , .� I t •• 1 SCJ • .4(??.. w • PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY L—— —— — — -- —--—0`—— — —--3 n EASEMENT LOCATION - _ n 8` _ s=E Q —— ,—�- .— U' 3� '(9 I 1 101 Cr St m S G O0x ( - r . .. 110_ /_, CJ ' �P 1 d 3i9.c)1 N 89°5(0' 3S''G COIT."' rT7117,777- eUnch ,4_,_ ,...f� • I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a drawing of the following described property: . Parcel A: That part of Lot 3, Block 1, CENTURY PLAZA SQUARE 3RD ADDITION, Scott County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the north 20.43 feet ( as measured at right angles to the north line).. Parcel It: Lot.2 and the north 20.45 feet (astateanured at rightangles t.. Urs north lin..) of Lot 3, Block 1, CENTURY PLAZA SQUARE 3RD ADDITION, Scott County. Minnesota. That I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated: November 3, 1993 )JaI I n oldi l/' riAl Allan R. Hastings Minnesota Registration No. 171109 121 Lewis Street S. Suite No. 102 • Shakopee, Minnesota Phone 612 445-4027 lid PLEASE BRING FEASIBILITY REPORT FROM JUNE 7, 1994 COUNCIL PACKET MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director ei" SUBJECT: Viking Steel Road (5) DATE: June 14, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 4025, which orders the preparation of plans and specifications for Sarazin Street(Viking Steel Road) and Roundhouse Street between 4th Avenue and County Road 16 for Council consideration. BACKGROUND: On March 8, 1994 the City Council ordered the preparation of a feasibility report for improvements to Viking Steel Road and an unnamed street just west of Viking Steel Road. The improvements were petitioned for by the property owners for the proposed Prairie Bend Development. The feasibility report recommends renaming Viking Steel Road to Sarazin Street since it connects up to the existing street of that name and Viking Steel Road was never officially named or dedicated as a street. It is proposed to name the new street just west of Sarazin Street as Roundhouse Street to conform to existing street names. For the remainder of the discussion and in the feasibility report, staff will refer to these two streets as Sarazin Street and Roundhouse Street. These two streets were requested by the developers of the Prairie Bend Subdivision. The City Council directed staff to also explore the feasibility of constructing Sarazin Street from 4th Avenue to Trunk Highway 101. This segment was not petitioned for. The feasibility report was submitted to Council on June 7, 1994 and a public hearing to consider the improvements set for June 21, 1994. Staff will give a presentation on the feasibility report at the public hearing. The feasibility report basically broke the study up into three segments: 1. Sarazin and Roundhouse Streets between 4th Avenue and County Road 16. 1 2. Sarazin Street between 4th Avenue and T.H. 101. 3. Extension of sewer and water on 4th Avenue to serve these streets. The actual petitioners of the project own approximately 2/3 of the land that Sarazin and Roundhouse streets are located in. The southern 1/3 of the property owners were not part of the petition. To complete the construction of these streets through these segments would require acquisition of additional right-of-way,whereas the Sienna Development is dedicating the right-of- way for these streets through the platting process. Staff is proposing to include the right-of-way acquisition costs in the assessments for these parcels that required right-of-way purchase. Resolution No. 4025 orders the design of the streets from 4th Avenue to County Road 16. Once the plans are completed, the Council could elect not to construct the southerly segment until such time as development warrants it, although this would leave two dead end streets in excess of 1,000 feet. Sarazin Street is a Municipal State Aid Street and therefore should be constructed completely through to County Road 16. Roundhouse Street may be subject to the County Engineers requirements for street spacing in regards to being able to connect to County Road 16 directly. The segment of Sarazin Street north of 4th Avenue was also evaluated in the report. The report indicates this segment is not feasible, but actually it probably should be rephrased to state that the timing for constructing this segment now is not practical. One of the main reasons for this is because of the large number of other State Aid Projects currently being designed or under consideration which is far exceeding our fund balance in this account and therefore affecting the City's ability to construct all potential State Aid streets. The City needs to construct those State Aid Routes that are most important for current development and therefore it may be prudent to postpone Sarazin Street north of 4th Avenue for two to three years, based strictly on fund balance alone, and not considering the other reasons outlined in the report for delaying this project. In addition, the Sienna Plat will be developed in stages, so it will be a couple of years before it generates the full traffic volumes projected. Basically, staff feels that this segment of Sarazin Street is feasible, but that the actual construction of it should be delayed somewhat. Staff could design the project and have it all ready to go (purchase right-of-way, obtain railroad and Mn/DOT permits, etc.) and then when funding is available it could be constructed. If Council desired to do this, Resolution No. 4025 should be amended to include this segment. The developers for Sienna Corporation would like these streets constructed as soon as possible to allow their development to proceed. Staff will be unable to design and bid this project in- house due to other workloads and time constraints. If this project is to be let in 1994, it will need to be designed using outside consultants. 2 Sienna Corporation currently has their own engineering firm, Pioneer Engineering, doing the survey and design of all their local streets and utilities. There would be some savings to the project to use this same consultant to design Sarazin and Roundhouse Streets and it would get completed sooner and possibly bid yet in 1994. Pioneer Engineering is not one of the City's consultants, so a separate contract for this one project would need to be executed. The other alternative is to use one of the City's consultants to do this design, which would not require any additional contracts. Staff is attempting to get a proposal from Pioneer Engineering prior to the June 21, 1994 public hearing. All fees for consultants would be recovered 100% through assessments and State Aid funds. Staff has also included several letters received to date regarding this project. Attached is Resolution No. 4025, which orders plans and specifications prepared for this project. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 4025 as drafted. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 4025 as modified by City Council. 3. Deny Resolution No. 4025. 4. Table Resolution No. 4025. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4025, A Resolution Ordering an Improvement and the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Sarazin Street,Between 4th Avenue and County Road 16; and Roundhouse Street, Between 4th Avenue and County Road 16; and 4th Avenue, Between Shawnee Trail and Sarazin Street, Project No. 1994-10 and move its adoption. DEI-I/pmp MEM4025 3 JON R.ALBINSON 5240 Valley Industrial Blvd. So. Shakopee,MN 55379 (612)445-9286 June 8, 1994 Mr. Dave Hutton CITY OF SHAKOPEE 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee,MN 55379 RE: Viking Steel Road Feasibility Study Dear Dave: I had an opportunity to review the above-referenced while I was sitting at the Council meeting Tuesday night. The report I read was dated 5/31/94. In reviewing the feasibility study, I noticed the portion of the project defined as Section 2,which is the existing gravel Viking Steel Road from 4th Avenue North to Hwy. 101,was suggested as not being feasible at this time. I would think it would be more accurately stated that it is feasible but possibly not practical, or at least a portion of the proposed project is not practical. Based on the development densities being proposed by Sienna Corp.,and traffic patterns that may be generated by same,I would think this road could be built exclusive of the sanitary sewer and water main and thereby eliminate this gravel road from our street system now. The sewer and water could then be brought in at a later date when additional information on the ultimate development of those areas is better defined by the current or future owners. The road is currently being used by Danny's Construction,which would suggest the heavy industrial traffic currently using it warrants it being improved. The example I can offer you of a similar project to this is the construction of 12th Avenue in 1985 by the City with the City then installing sewer and water in 1992/93. I would think it is appropriate and in the best interest of the City to develop the roadway portion of this project now versus at some future date. This should prove to be an important collector street in our roadway system, and could possibly lighten the traffic load on Marschall Road. I know you didn't ask for my comments on this,but I felt it necessary to respond. Thank you for your interest in my concerns. --Res eec fully, r' Jo R. Albinson C Member JRA:jmcx-39.5 cc: Dennis Kraft Mayor Gary Laurent Lindberg Ekola Mike Phillips-Chair,CDC MNIMII Suite 608.4940 Viking Drive•Minneapolis,Minnesota 55435.612-835-2808 CORPORATION June 9, 1994 . David Hutton, P.E. City of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Prairie Bend Reports Dear Dave: Thanks again for the efforts of you and your team in getting the Prairie Bend and County 16 reports to the Council. T I e Lenzmeier family has some very short deadlines and your cooperation has been gr-atlyappreciated. Sincerely, 101111114110111.111111/ piA J. . Johnston ''s je A ager • as Planners • Developers • Contractors I� / oo t1/4.` ''-'52" , I e STEEL PRODUCTS, INC. CORRUGATED METAL CULVERTS FITTINGS AND ACCESSORIES HWY.#101 EAST P.O.BOX 172 SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA 55379 TELEPHONE:(612)445.1458 o e "AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER" MN TOLL FREE NUMBER 1.800.252.5819 June _ 5 , 1994 Shakopee City Council 129 Holmes St So Shakopee , Mn . Io the Counci_members , I have received notice on the proposed project =1994-10 . Because I will be out of state on June 21st and stand to be assessed for segment two and three , I wanted to state my objections to those segments . Segment two would be the North-South gravel road known as Viking Steel Drive . This is an estimated assessment of $423 , 584 . 03 . My portion is $153 , 036 . 12 . At the present time , this has the potential to serve one ( 1 ) full time person on my property. There are no buildings or people on the other side of the road . This does not seem to be very cost efficient . Segment three, along fourth avenue , is a $106 , 889 . 07 project and my assessment would be $15 , 351 . 60. At the present time , I have no use or need to have this , as there are no buildings along fourth on my property to serve . My uderstanding of the need for this is to form a loop to benefit the proposed housing developement to the south, so let them pay for it if they need it. I always thought that assessments had to be justified with benefits . I see no benefits in segement two or three for Viking Steel at the present time . Thank you for your consideration. Yours truly, a CITY OF SHAICOPEE JUN 1 4 1994 Ray C. Peterson Viking Steel Products , Inc . E C E i v E RESOLUTION NO. 4025 A Resolution Ordering An Improvement And The Preparation Of Plans And Specifications For Sarazin Street, Between 4th Avenue And County Road 16; Roundhouse Street, Between 4th Avenue And County Road 16; And 4th Avenue, Between Shawnee Trail And Sarazin Street Project No. 1994-10 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 4007, adopted on June 7, 1994, fixed a date for Council hearing on the proposed improvement of Sarazin Street, between County Road 16 and Trunk Highway 101; Roundhouse Street, between 4th Avenue and County Road 16; and 4th Avenue, between Shawnee Trail and Sarazin Street by street, sewer,water, storm sewer and sidewalk; and WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held on the 21st day of June, 1994, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. That the improvement is ordered as hereinafter described: Construction of Sarazin Street and Roundhouse Street, between 4th Avenue and County Road 16 by street, sewer, water, storm sewer and sidewalks; and construction of sewer and water on 4th Avenue, between Shawnee Trail and Sarazin Street. 2. David E. Hutton, Public Works Director is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement, and shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney �+ VI No I v I �I OD O a o co, CD CO o Z rn Q) a) a) cn (.'1 c W N N ) N - O O 3 O co Coco C p o- OI 8 I i i I CD N O O 0 CD (D = cn A 0 y Z r Z r x NNi 0 0v N Ni y C) ? N N S a) 0 3 a) o o w 3 �, c) 0 x rn o c a = a y € r 3 O a To m T3 ? "0 ' m w K n• s M n a' coH g 03 o N m , co D © m s .. • > > n a ~ `� a cn • m a a co m - a y z © o 0 O < m O -, ? o o o CO W CD cn coCA m - coCD N co N • CVD CCDD CVO a CVD 3 . H CD. L� m _► ED. O (0 a -COP. I mz rnmCnma) z (nmOrnmcna) -iNmmCamc) 0) Ln (nPoa1 a O • cn cn X AO cn o co (a cn w A N t n o (� v, cn c.) Cil CA O z a) N IV D 0 -Ti N -I A A W N n N W A O O N A N A D N '^ _ (7 A K N m N (n r%) V 1 o -� n n m -I O a> o N v<' - ' 1 co m XZZ r O O m OD -o - cn A 0 < V) a tnm 1 m CD l+, CO 0 M s?o N a O Cn m rn 8 o cn O p, m o w , co co COAi x cn U1 w 12 xz � G ' o Cr) - 71O Cr: V o 03 0,n o C7 0 W -n C ? O_. O ?) , co Z .' W < DCA N ZD MW 3 (n ZN Q°rI7 n p - Z N Z - O O N N Z g z(/) < i O m -r Z A (/) 71 CO Cr c,, jm _ W -1 o A O cn OmZQom N z 0 o oom . X (71m CmA Z2. 73 al Wp O H O (71 -nD a) 0 73 W C4 t Om FrO o l aV) W N) W O o CCD V V N C.3 no a) (o cO m V l 0 0 O co i c0 -D ^rn (19 j 69 69 69 69 Ey 77 = CD C) CD O O Ni co _. co CO( Nn N y ) f) ¢) (T a) N WAW - to a CD -D N CO (ND O A P p V a) Q Q FT I �C �1J COVCOD - j A A Z CA A CoACDWCO W .73 H o O � W C) Co N A A N m A CO A O co -+ b A 03 m CO 0 o v1 O CD .i -' Z 6, > l ll cn V A A 69 69 cn 69 CO CD m CD C.) Cr)Ca in A iv O W OO co "co in C j, 3 si P W A aD j CA CD r V 0 CO A .. 61 > jdVt V vN W Q1 Uf o A o CN71 O O 3 3 N aD V -J Co CO O A7 a. O in A a) U1 a N co o co+ W O D COCw N CO -' C.) O. CD -1 CCD N) co co co Cn O N CO O A W N A cn 3 W CD W Cv co c0 A C.) W N Ni 7 A o W A C.) j iv 1Z n) a oa T > O D ') CD J 0I CO -II � I `O' CZ c N m m C N CZ 3 '< co m ^ C 1-- -i N m m n c) C OW, — x N x mCn A0Cnn & rfl 0 a0- O N Cr) - < CA m r- * DO0 .e. m O n q a'N HO T1� I A CZn N Z Z O O N N /n CD CD O CD Z A CA T1 co cn lJ J CA N z s0m ° 0 0 � Cn o = 3 = � _ * 0 II C U) 'a -0 5. -0 ,� Z D mCD Cr)cil D 71 D D 0 ° N � 0 �� m N tn >� Z CD CD O CD O D O DA>N 3 C.71 m 1 O O O O o II II II II II II II ni 6961 69 (0 01b9 .A O CO 1—+ --,1 O C d'�/� O J A 01 A --03 0 CO CO N A C..) -+ N ). N O N CJI1 V CO 1"f"S Z 0 0 C „...._ ! 0 z CO iv I I (a (a i (c (C i o 0 O o 0 ZI o o� of o 0 3 A W N I N) \.) (S I SD, O O OI O O co a - co 0 U D - Q - y N C A i{ 0.1 0 — 1n m co ` arO, 'cm ; to C4 m f Cn Cr) v c•- I v m (D 3 > C7 0 H co `< (. a 0 90 m O ? C� _ a, � o `� c Ka � ml co co = v, m > Oo1 �~j (71 rl cn C -n CD _. CJ co I? Z D co '11 •C _.a p W CD . Fi CO 0 w ` 41. m 01 a Ca m CU H�.�y 0 W °i (n m; - l-iyJ n _ V ar) -I H 0 -. ( mn � � � r� ` xxx �1 > > 0 -IoO — W _ Oj C ! > D °' cn ,co � cn 7J r < = N A Z -4 N m N U) N o N D N i r C4 vi N r 3 m 3 v ZO � � Zm (n � O � oc m u C4 o N m 0 CD Ti,' a mmmOrnArO n � � mpr� F�-ry� 0 mm0cn2cnzm D � (N, z;0 rii a) 3 > 3 c a 3' -to ...< X [ -1m (nm � cn � ? mI) >i 3• 0 CD > > ai (71 71 Z r -- cNi, 30 N m m CD Z Z N V/ m U) m T Cn T "' D t1I Z Z G) C° IZT7 A U) - g f11 !n i-5 F/\�� cit 3 _, 0 ? Vi O N Cl) Q m <� Z Cn m A O j o 1^ co n = n 3CD O 30 O 30 N +(ri A O (�" A m to zC A a)1 CD II Fos ? O ^ O 7 O W c o Z A o < 3:3 I �'{ II 11 II II 11 II II II 0 m A Z� fA 69 A 01 6HNC ) cn -a. I Na O O Cl)in CAJ1 - C)) COC0 N � 69 Cr) A O ,--.; V 1 (n W Na O O N CD Nm _ )'-11(n O Cn A O in N V O O o' olm O W N 0 O Nn O coCU O O O O O� 0 I D 69 I ►�•.{ wI w (n 1 /� 0 N (r m m T lo Na N) 64 0 0 o 3 y M V (b O O A A m .< tTl co co O O N i (n 1? A ((n N I - (i9 l N 11 A V C.) WIm 6, 01 N 69 69 In -' CA m { (n O O N, N 3 3 ,+J N O O COj W1m_ w- cn N 0 OI �! �I 3 Dr H f) G, CD A r.‘); _. CD m CO CSD 0 0 CVJ, AIm G I icp n 13 C))69 W �i �•IN o O O O ODI N y C) (n N - I CD Ari co CA m 0 CD 0 O O 0-1 EA O W' QN)I3 F,`, a' a O O O O I W I m CoW 0 O O 0 TI O D `< `< > --I O) - N m C \•) V CT) N OI OI(D O O b o OOI N1m I 69 64 69 EAI I D cn W �i r.. CC) CD N N OI 1m m l O N VA NIn0 cN �' ; A-CO CO CD 1 rn3 in WWV� m O (.71 (T, ODI A DS A 69 6969 E6; 6'D N N V N N V N m -I (1 V CCD - CP - C/1 - cn O CD OD Cn 3 in bo V1 V Cn V W V (n co V O 0 r 7✓ • N N N N -D1 V V - V 0 CO CO CO i CO 0 0 O co) 0 OC O CD 0 O, O 3 cnN, N, N CS 0 I 0I N O ��.�.yy rn 0Co D A C) 0 1 ll A A) O n s.) N `� + A) N = p - (D a Co 7- O 1 7- a) D _o = m m ao m r i .D m H CD CD -. S N I 7 a Ko -,— . � 0 . < r0o , Cn m a Kfl Cn = I 0 CD Cn C71 C n Cl CN CCD(i E m co 0 co CD IiCO COCDco C/' 0W - ril 0o m P .l CD f' CI) cn cn a) Z rn z to m C) a)'-i iv m m cn m co cr,-i -► 00 m - mj01IQA -, xNx 1�,-y o O •co m Cn - al o co c Cn • C) o C) CJI 11l � _ ND T� H r < 17 N v' N -I _. A (4 N 1 W ., K K N v1 Z OSx -o O i O rn - - o m1 Cn - - -- < w m 1--- 3> C/1 Hcni CCD cn � CCD co m m m -n0 � 17 D O Cn m rn co A m o Co n m � �,.y Cl) co : X 17 Cl) W � _ � Z rn 1 A X 0 0 0 MI o Cn co r -rt m r) 3 . 3 o ►vZr � m _� 0ON cno 017 v) z cn 5 > H CD D CD D D m zc„ m Z a. rn cWn m cn UWi- '0 Z Z co -a co co cn m .. - z z - OONN �. _ m — �, cn m CO cn o co Crl C,D Cil CO N N A n �' 00 m Z Sx m o CCD 0 m m A tl o m m H DO 0 o II II II II II 5 m �? M� 69 ��" 0 69 w 69 v D M� O N -' O A n 11J CO -CO (D CD -CO - (13 O -N (0 Co *coj- O al A CD ` 0 al Cn A 0 0 N)) -4 C 49 ND cD U) CCD -C7 -CO V v rnV y /* rte' H (1) � H co (D co . C) ^1 CO CO MW D w 69 Ej 69 C -' -P. - C..) N COC cD -CA -CO N Q7 cA C C� lil CD 03 A :--1 A. coO = O N •O co W co V 6_9 0 69 49 A coC a) CP co O N CCD -1 co CA) - Co A C o, CO 0 COT1 W 3 0^) J1 W O O O A •A j I W co 1l.. PLEASE BRING FEASIBILITY REPORT FROM JUNE 7, 1994 COUNCIL PACKET MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: County Road 16 Improvements DATE: June 15, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 4026, ordering the preparation of plans and specifications for County Road 16 between County Road 17 and County Road 83. BACKGROUND: On February 15, 1994 the City Council of Shakopee ordered the preparation of a feasibility report for improvements to County Road 16. The focus of the report was providing sewer and water within the County Road 16 corridor in anticipation of Scott County reconstructing the roadway to four lanes in 1995. The feasibility report was completed and submitted to City Council on June 7, 1994. Subsequently, a public hearing to consider the improvements was scheduled for June 21, 1994. Staff will give a presentation on the feasibility report at the public hearing. The report addresses not only sewer and water construction but City cost participation on the County project (i.e. curb and gutter, etc.). At the conclusion of the public hearing, if the City Council determines that this project should be constructed, attached is Resolution No. 4026 which orders the plans and specifications prepared for this project. This project would be designed for 1995 bidding and construction. Staff is proposing to design this project in-house. In preparing for the June 21, 1994 public hearing, staff discovered that those properties that would only receive an assessment for the curb and gutter on the County's project were inadvertently omitted from the notification list. In addition, the notices that were sent out only referred to the sewer and water improvements and did not mention the curb and gutter improvements. The two choices available to Council are to continue the public hearing to provide time to notify the additional properties or to schedule a second hearing. The City Attorney has indicated that even if the public hearing were continued, all properties would need to be notified again for the curb and gutter portion. Therefore, there would be no cost savings in continuing the public hearing. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 4026, which orders the sewer and water improvements. 2. Deny Resolution No. 4026. 3. Table Resolution No. 4026. 4. Continue the public hearing, to allow notification for the curb and gutter. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. The City staff would like to get started on the sewer and water design. The curb and gutter public hearing does not need to be held until the County is ready to construct (but prior to them awarding the bid). Since all new notices need to be sent out, staff would recommend conducting a second hearing this fall or winter on the curb and gutter. Council could still order the sewer and water improvements now. At the June 21, 1994 hearing the Council could inform those in attendance that the second notice will only be for the curb and gutter improvements. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4026, A Resolution Ordering an Improvement and the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for County Road 16, Between County Road 17 and County Road 83, Project No. 1994-11 and move its adoption. DEH/pmp MEM4026 RESOLUTION NO. 4026 A Resolution Ordering An Improvement And The Preparation Of Plans And Specifications For County Road 16, Between County Road 17 And County Road 83 Project No. 1994-11 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 4014, adopted on June 7, 1994, fixed a date for Council hearing on the proposed improvement of County Road 16, between County Road 17 and County Road 83 by sanitary sewer and water service; and WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held on the 21st day of June, 1994, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. That the improvement is ordered as hereinafter described: Installation of sanitary sewer and watermain on County Road 16, between County Road 17 and County Road 83. 2. David E. Hutton, Public Works Director is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement,and shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 3. The City Council shall let the contract for all or part of the improvements as authorized by Minnesota Statutes,42641, Subd. 2 no later than two years from the date of adoption of this resolution. i{a9.0,0 Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney Ni. Ni Ni ', Ni N; Ni Ni Ni r..) --- ._ V, V V .. V V; -, V' V V CO': CO CO '^ (O (O I CO Q CNh O' O O O' O O1 C V Cn, Cn CJ, 1 cr CT 1 (.' Co. V co Z I co co 0 co 1 C O1 O O C O O O , N O CO 0 v• CT. A' A I N -' (O II I I I , I - I cr pI O Ci 01 O OI O CO .- f./) Cn73c-'CnvQC/3 QV) — CA W QCn – N! r - cn '�•G) 7 �'1•'Cn 'D = p wI. p m 0' a o 0' N ^ I= CO m S W n, • o = co ,o p = c n, < w W 7 d V ;n a, < V E ,c •-' r n, CO C+-._ u., 0, C=, f?o 7c CO O x W x �C p x W G 7c- m (n CD O x CT ;x p 7c Q O 0 CAA !C) O n' O m m 0 O 10 •0 5 (A o m • o j o — o x =Im x m coo z 01CD A.) m Q T °i o d c o cn .ICD o o -. N V CD O oiCD O Cn - O 7;— O 7 A I A m n c '. C m v, 0 12 ? CM o ? © © ? o o • a, o I. © 0. a, ? • CD - COai ? C m 3 0 ccn o m c((1 r' ("n 7 ("n o 10 (71 – O .u, Ac on , > C s `n m •0 N Q O O W Q c' 0. IO AI V Q © 0 7c'V • O r co _ a CO c y j 1 0. :O Cn Cn p v, Cn u, z Q c co CM ) C,, Cn'p sx r cn Ui r' rn r- ImW: -n -, c,, m -• mm -•1MCC.', -• 71mz � -,: O X 0 � ACn cn wcn � C 1- ° Cn;� ACJ, rtxvmAc• w0 - I O Iaa,, -n N • N A N "< N Z N!� -n N D CA x m N�W. r p O r n ca Cn m CO Cn Z m 0 A * --I 0 I c!J Z > m 0 7' > .� r O CA —. 710 .. cp001 W Q, N 'n0I -' � ..1 Z I m _. o CCD, Lon _. A r CO CWJ, 7' r Cn: Q 77 0 a, (C) f� a 717 � Calzz * Ap XOzC;; m > r N � 0 Ap � AO _ vmV! r = > � 'c-) * gi m com r `20 � f > cn � wi r -< 6-, .p W Z -tCn O A m co Q, a) AI >. n cn m v, z v, z m v _N Or M AO a. to OCvaO � - m � Xxo �1 c!) r -i0 /� Xcn p ? C7 � A x0 z � -na1 --1 O �► m 0 0 m CO w V * -4 y o CA > 0 O ,�.� p-..� rr1 dJ F--a iii 2 P O – :- Trd� 4 co cn CJ, A (J C in V s -• N CO CO — CT, (.,I O CO r� V1 Icn C cn69 69 4,9 VI (n A N (.O (NJ, cm Oi 6"9� V (O (D lei a) co O V VI (n O. VI N O 0 m W V A A N CO N I V, _. CO A (n O V N I O C,; COI co V A 73 C) V1 4p.�.� 1 _0 ll� m CD CO • O O O Ni O O N OI O O y m 0. 0. A W �I i �-! C)• 0 0a a,. CO Co 4 • Vj` A V ? O W OI AI O CO ` J 1 V>) I .--,.N. "\ \� v s • ' 69I 64 1 CD y W by N .. N' N C:• W 1 H y •- GSI O N NCI co VI 6Ca 9 3 d; CT, V co d a)I W CO O N: O 7 I i I �! A' "co CO 001 *CO A CD A. W O W J • > • H Cn CD 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 N O I O O O • O O C. O, O O 3 C', O; co o O O O 0 O. O 0 CD 0 i O� O O O O O • C •Oi O O O O O, C O O O •• O; 0 0 0 C O1 C 0 0 0 > I – E^ cs co 69 69 A 69 69 CD U CD W .a A fOJ, O O V W C,, ; C) W V V 3 6, W W co C A (.n I Ni'` Cn CD C'+ — COI Q (O7 A V A "71 C W I ... C: CJ, 0 N Nt N� 'V N. ▪ N N' Ni V. V� V V iii V �:� V c� CO! co I CO CO CD CO CO i 0 O O! 0' 0 OI 0' 0• 01 Co I W CO O' O O CC 0; O' 0'C _� Ni - - !Q _7 WI NA C) N -I Oco O. 81 C iI OJI�O OI O I I • i p �' Cn N C N �:O ,. Q C', W = C W;� c n v c O �. V L 3 d N.) 4D ca .0 N) 0 < S: ,t, N) .4Z;" O �Iv Z C.4 CO, 3 x O n-ix �� 2, > > •-- C x•-ix- Cr LI vc cn CIo Op �,Q Cn C o m $ w!sc c a 0 :1 a :)i€ m o` " o a x �!c O a m O. ? c� co cn o = m C ICD - n gin -. P °Im n ° W o < i� ° CD O (D Q° O N cn 40 ? a �j O C G, C a * < N c C ip -r - 008 7 ? ? p O p .O. < ? O r.? aI r ? a O CD - Cn O d V+ N .L O CT r. C.7 I p 0 • Cfl m W Cin X N cT A" .< N ?. CO 0;- CEJ n ‘-63 C`00 Q W C '` CO w < CO "0c0 c •co a = a = I P ° : o ca n O 3 `. o 3 I p O '5 7 //'�� Z - z (.71 p m Z -1 c 1 p _.. p I O m - U',O - :n c O go c: O cn;m CA C./1N U l 1 C.) L7 fJ1 < Z' p (J) > CT I Z Z �+tr. CT G Lcr, � Cn W C:. co, m („) (T CTPk) /^1j O N co N p O N X N I 0 Do r; N,O O N� a N.▪ ` r\)10-• A N Co N C7 Lr 1 ww z � _ m Oxcn•, mz �° z ? m1OOr Lmr. .4 U m � OQr ;..1Cnmcnm � cn � mNv+ ; o (a " Z OcnrnZm � vogz azcnmN > o - � - a > —` ° * * o Oa, CO ��^'{ co p N a) A N C7 m c�1 x O (/':C.71p O.U CC �' CO• ? <!c, A < Q C� ���..{ G7 C ,p,{ O Z W Cp1'1 A AG ? CO Cf) C.� < < X a C)I(D N C CO 47, -P O 37 -t W Cz z C�C N a <� A m zcf) <� N ''"-3 O 9 O O V N < 1 0 m m N r. N O T A p CA m _ O m x X x r\) x. N CO A (O N = O O S:3 z m +� V N (7 -n .'4' m ? Z� ? O a �I ? W 0 A ca c� mO OccN G V 7 M A CO K rn < N a� ? �i u� d -a O\ � � 4 O O O P NP 1 OD CO a V '-� pV CO CO V W M"�V -1 Cn Cn 4 0 69 N; 6969 N x r C) N 3 © Z tt ✓ CO co CO N' N! Ci C), � C F arCD ll,cdCCD Q O. O o CP i A A V Cn' O a{ O a coW 4) CO W V V V V; O C)f I ! • \ yTV41 I `jI o ti ' yyrJ N Nb . 61 CD 6) (l); V C)' E . 1 6: r 5..n cz O C y A V 0 A A OI OI `j o co V tr...), ../ 1 > • EA 69 69 64 � 69I 6I 69 69 4n co `` y < I 0 0 0 0 0 -co 0, 0 0CD S co f oP P20 01l oI i a N FA i U EAI - 64 64' 69 i cp 69 C.)69 C4 OI p N� .^. W, .. W!N 0 CO' p N' :' cN7i P'3 Cu- O; CD O; N W (J)1 J C.n. � p d• C : C!! N C) p l C.) N' .r .: ' I r Y- Ni 7' fV'� NiI Ni Ni. -J Ni N' . V I V V V < V •�' V 17 169 1 i 1 : I _� CD I CD CD CD•. CJ tD CD.O • o' O 0 O; C :7 co co� CD q; q 88 I 0.Z I�= 7 O O O:c N 4- O CID1 V- C) (3,I3co q CS i O 0 0 0I C 0i 0 0lm I C 1 r K i Cf) Ni O'Ci) Ni C. N <I Ci) Ni = CI) Ni 0 Cn Ni n Cn (N) C- .G) O f o p p ? N ?' "�ID) 01 y C.) Cp.) : C7 N - , 0 p C) ? x- CO) =7. � 0? 7 F C) x 0 .. x N p : x q p x- ? m S. cn CD 0 m m 0o m m 11) 93 m I - n' 0o m a € II, .> IF c.)) 2 CD 0 TI A `,0- Sp ? 0 CD ca ;r;` to Cbl ,,CD CO O 79 0 Co - 3 p O (n CD m p C/) CD C/) CD co �; tv n ��� n Z o I K n �I K n c K n d K n = Q of A D 7 KI7 Cy m 1 7• m .. . 7 -, G i Z © p * ° !c �fu a) CAX-"CI•inx3 ; � cn � x =i c"'nxx! c', xCD a c. g m A' V rwtamwp0 ` 05 CJCO �1 Ca � pgo ` QO (" oCD g) w f oar' CDn3i cDac 0n - `� a A Cl). 3 0 7 I x CD o CI CD q 1(:ozco .:%. 0c) z -, q '9 J Z C7 CO!'" n CO (7 q i Z -1 C7 cD -1 Cn Z Z z E _ _ SIC -. _ O O IoOcn ? Kcn Ncnq - (n0 woD) c-.' 1 5.,Mw 0cn -• O0cn l� Im -n cn cn ? x V I Nir CD U) N!O O Cn Nm q ? m N o O m N //�� 'O n N I_, Cn N w N G :n N C: p V Q° N N p a N Q 8 N z a 0.1 N C7 vl m 9 - Q ca -0 p -- i -0 cD — Z Cn q . PI m Z C/ r _ C) O caO C4tO Z =) O0 Z [ 0.mm Q. cDQOOwm < Om -+ iOcpzQoZ CD m QZ lc,, OZi , ,; * m (ZDp * Z�a) CO MM 1z < oOm Ex � � � m - 1mz',c NZ � cDC � N !� � m � CO ll, ►� I•m,I Q ril m Z a n0 0 C ge N ON., CD n .. i (� < ..... N m z rQ p cn m ? 'pZ xm ? _, * z NiN Z - - Z ZcnAnfO * nZ Z *Lq < Z -' M� mrz0n � x rpZ - mm Q!coc. 9 � mom - mc m * H /1-d � rZ -1cnM ? c: amA aoZC �imv - wpm ? O � (gr, � 3 O 0 ? \ �� Z N = Z'O m ? O Cn ? w o * cn ? mm O n 7\3 0 Ni :o.at Iv ),—i -1 C;\ CD 0 0 0 0 0m 4 o C4 C) COD CCD (Vn CCDD CD CCD CCD C4 > 0 C �1 O CD CD co N r 64 69 M O 64 EA crt (xi 00 N 0 �f El, 69 qic, p 0 M`l�� N y C?DI N N) p CD V` 4 Cy -C7 A rrri Co 0. Cr) 7 N) 0 O Oi 0 A� 0 Ata W ` i w �i -I �I vIm `< `< H I ID c Y- 69 69. 69 69 1CD cri �,\\ , N- N N N NI Ni N N:y O '� '`\.J _ INi N \ _( V c) a)a) j ^„o)I Nia, CA a)I CD d - '( w I IV ? ? Ai ? ?I d ?I^ �... co ? p ? ? I I Ia CA 69 69 61 64: 69 i EA EA �.y b o:3 AI I . O O O O• O I O' O I 0 CD CD i o O o O: o; $; of 0.3 bbi O O 0! O' O1 O1 0 0 0 0 0; o oI 0; • iim , 6r, tq. 69 EA 64:0 -i. C.) C.) C.) C.) C.) W' C.) N O W W CJ W 3 O N N1 N CD r 50 Nf Ni ? - ' Ni c"al C.) _ " ('! w 1 C^) C"): C) _ O : O CO CD 0 0 OI C o J I U (� ! Cp Z CCO I p w 0 0 o� v ` ? (, C O I c. O c: O ,(J N Oi I 0 0 O O — O G, VI OD O. V c— co 7 cIco- 001' co — 01 to N CCnz. ` Fj(n V I CDtoa0CI ~ Xnm cc m, P.I 0C/) r oy� © - ` sci, o e* • p • c a v, m V, U: © •V, © �, V, — cn � - cv'i, (7 O C.7i c' r cn cn x p W - W C..3 y N t7 V m V Q C a CO CD - CO CD CO a c o a - y C O Cj 7 a C) co r o Z r colo Z Go Z a Z Z - _ o , m rC.., _ Z " � "< - z { -'I" * (� * i m * IOW - N r u, G 15 - 0 C, v, Z (r Zu,.wnr - v, m _, a7i, cnO cr, ^ N � N * Z 7'm > N { o � QmN:� mcD � N r '�: n C) N m -o A m m N n O 32 t o O to O > Z Cn 0 ` E r y z� O O < 1. 03 N — _4 O -1 Z N CrQ Z Z -- La" O Z '� — O., - FCS( O � m ` r- o a) z � -s1O ^iw < < moo * ZC — CO tIl -n _, V p om co Oca nC) mOto ° M ° M0 ? mC -P `-+ ca 0-3 c, m � • C•4 11 '—I " G) ::, m ?J :M go DD z n cn Z r (oc olmrZn z0XZ0mO1 mzr _, � 2o m o O 5, 0o < >ipc -0 co � � pa c' j0 O O O to N Q 23 (fl - O C") I u 73 m co o 7) I 1 jg -i c rt 40 0 0 0 �'j — cl0 o _ p. c0 Ni col c —i I y C0 • m M -1 64 N - 44 m _64 64 C U, V O tri A CD V r C..7 m (� �i V > in L') ? NI l� �` ���.qq I > r 1 rn 43, m 0 a - �a o 0 oI o , o _.m no CO M p co i W C CD C CD J I 64 •© m J '•1�1 N 64 C 69 y N y. '� N N _ ) °' o a' \1 CA I • r 64 H m co r\ 64 64 69 699 H y Z, b b 3 c O o o a G 0 C 0 C 0 0 0 8 0 o c 0 .. I i > N cay 64 64 64 N 1 ; 664 E+ C, —1 w W c.% I c7 (4 6) (0 C) C, .: v 3 C) N L. wj O -. O O V ?j •v co cca c:' w 1 :.., : v I NI -4i �_ Oil N p:Z CD -- 05.•.,0 a cn V C- = -"4 Z d X' cnc p a CD 0 K ° 0_ 0 ? c • c C7 — V' p ., w 3 v y • C C, 5 z n ...,1 Cv '� r'1 { Q ` ` 2 (71 O L— a� Q X' o ZzN 0 C. 0 > " > a� znmr -i < vi a) 01cnn m cn co - Z o cD o � � ov CO 'h, f� N cn = Z OOT p (C Z �/ cn 0 N ? y r � � M y y a CD N ? /v 'to 0co o -n cn cD OO I> > A CD n O -I -i i 3) to CD .O-. BM O u 11 II II 11 11 r., rii ti N69 N ).....-kT 1-+ ' O W W b9 co _ c3 c Ci) Pelf V - co O -+ -J y o _ ` N m lO f+^J �q := O V O N Cb cp a v 1 HT1 > -I N N C3 I t4 Crl fil co Z tocp� O 0 0 '^(73 1'3 7 A r 7C' VL tri in I W U co W Z Hrr ) N0 \(�\\N r � a �,CA W CA ..;:s, tiJ W i 3 i.; CD CD o C.3 64 y 51 ` 0 p ? p� to 0 ! I- vjy CZ OSI ' -1 L8.L1717'LS = an? Jed lua.:Jssessy !?Ja3El 9L'810`le LS = luawssassy ;EJa1EI 12:o1 SL'810'181S 199'53 l Ielol 80d 0196'08Z MSS 9£'08Z MS '£8•60Z 3S 3n8n3 11717£l MS 'LEE 3S '17£1SS N. '80d 01 'ZE£ 3 'OSLS '91x0 dO i0'8 17/13N Z/1.3 dO 3NI1 6LESS 'uW 'aadoMMEgS M dO 1NI WOO 17/1.3S Z/13 PAIR N eaJO 81683 098Z Z91709'ES 05'3 Old '8 v/13 N Zl13 Old ZZ 911. 8 s6u!y1 r uealul8>I '8 y P1Aea 0-ZL0806-LZ AMH V1.91L X3 NaaV Hl17 S.ld2fVH V8'1. X3 Naay 088 S,1d3fVH y17' X3 VS'? X3 17/13S 6LESS 'uW 'aadm!EgS 17113N '8 VS X3 '91.1dO dO S I!EJ1 Jen8H 880Z 96'SZ9'0£8 17Z'LZ ONIAI 17/1.3N 17/13S ZZ 91.1. 8 Jan8H E!u16J!A d aua6n3 0-690906-LZ 6L£S5 'uW 'eadon{EgS V9'1. X3 9E'LL6 N dO SIR 9 WO I!EJL Jan2H 880Z LL'661.`9S 0£17 dO N 17/13N 3/1M Old ZZ 911. 8 JanEH E!u!6J!A d aua6n3 0-890806-LZ 038 01 Z'98Z MN 'S'ZS L 3S 'S0'99Z MS '001. MN '80d 01 6LES9 'uW '88do)IEuS 17'82 MN 1d0O 3S dO N 9'1.09 I!EJ1 J9 1-1 L9L2. 98'180'LS 9L'0 WOO 17113N 17/IMS Old ZZ 911 8 PUelen i(y10Joa '8 p!Euoa 0-P170806-L3 6LE9S 'uW 'aadoNEgS I!EJ1 JanEH 8802 68'90E`ZS 09'1. 17/L3N Z/I.N NI V9'1. ZZ 911 8 JanEH E!u!6J!Ad aua6n3. 0-1170806-LZ Naay 01=18 S.1d311VH 6LESS 'uW 'aado){EgSI V8l'L X3 VL17'X3 17/13N 17/1MS IieJ1 JanBH 880Zi 6£171.L17L5 Z8'19 NI 8 17/1.3N 17/!MN ZZ 911. 8 JanBH d aua6n3 0-0170806-LZ 6LESS 'uW 'aadoilEuS'. PM8 IeiJisnpul A811E/1 9L2S. L6'0£8`6ZS 69'03 ON?>11dyd Jed n8Id31NVO a 101inO )1ed 16 E9S ui LIIM a 0/OM! 0-800£Z L-LZ PAlS IE!Jlsnpul /CaIIEn 9LZS 567E0'ZS 117'1. aNZ >11db'd A 11l81d31NVO 0101in0 MJEd IE!Jlsnpul uaaJO AaLIBA 0-L00£Z 1.-LZ 6L899 'uW 'aadoi!EgS PM8 lE!Jlsnpui A8118A 9LZ9 99'6179'1.8 17l'L ON? >id'dd A'dfSa31NVO 8 101inO )1JEd IE!Jlsnpul ueeIO 0-900£Z 1.-LZ 6LESS 'uW `aado)iBL1S PAlS IE!Jlsnpul A9IIBA 9LZ9 0E'086'8ZS l'OZ ONZ >11dyd A1181d31Nd0 V .011nO )IJEd IE!Jlsnpul uaaJO AailBA 0-S00EZl-LZ uo:d!Jos!a I26a1 I J8UM0 JegwnN aid luawssassy 86Eeny f �(lJadoJd 1 1£1818-1 , lEJalel 11 /Ni OS'L£9`EBSS 1 �8 Pa�ioau0 lso0 loafoJd ` r N✓;-, ��i A8 PaJBdaJd t'661- HOEIV W SIN3ISISS3SSV OMI INHIAI HS SIN31AI3AO2IdYAII 91 QVO2I AINIlOD ; ; y 89'00L`ZS = 9.10E Jed luawssassy IEJa1E1 00'SZ9'i£S =luawssassy IEJaIE1 moi 00'9Z9'1.£9 LL'L t I IEloi 6LE99 'U `eado)IEyS HIV>laYd Adf181131NV3 PAIR IE!JlsnPul AaIIEA 9LZS I. >118 L 101 MiEd IE!Jlsnpui LIMO /(allEA 0-L009S L-LZ! 08'ZO L`LS £9'Z 6LESS 'uy 'aado ceys QNZ>1121Vd A1:1f181131NVO PAIS IE!flsnpui AaIIEA 9LZ9 I. >118 Z 101 )1JEd IE!Jlsnpul uaaJ0 AaIIEA o-ZOOEZ L-LZ £17171.9`69 9S'E 6L£S9 'uW 'aado)IEys aNZ>layd Al:1 18a31NVO PAIS IE!Jlsnpul AeIIEA 9LZS l >118 l 101 )IJEd IE!Jlsnpui uaaJ0 AaIIEA 0-1.00£Z1.-LZ i LL'L06't�lS ZS'S luawssassy a6Eaioy 1 uo!lduos!Q IE6a1 Jaurn0 I i(1JadoJd JagwnN aid, 'Els ld!1 'Els 11!1 / oo'9z9't£s r/ A8 W109140 I lso3 11.6S '---".-v'v; / 1//`' '"''% A peJEdaJd P661 HO VW SINrnIISSaSSV aautu INglAIOHS SINMLILAO2IdIATI 91 GVO?I A1NI1O0 olZ(..., CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Julie Baumann, Planning Intern RE: Application for an Amendment to the Zoning Map from Highway Business (B-1) to Heavy Industrial (I-2) DATE: June 15, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Princess Marble has submitted an Application for an Amendment to the Zoning Map. They are requesting that the City rezone a 7.5 acre site from Highway Business (B-1) to Heavy Industrial (1-2). This site is being proposed for industrial development by the applicant, and is located south of the Blue Lake Treatment Plant on the south side of T.H. 101. The area is currently zoned B-1, Highway Business. (See Exhibit A.) At their June 9, 1994, meeting, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning request to the City Council. BACKGROUND: The site was annexed into the City of Shakopee in October of 1971 from Eagle Creek Township. At that time, it was zoned Highway Business (B-1). In 1979, the City rezoned the site to Heavy Industrial (I-2), and in 1981, the site was rezoned back to Highway Business (B-1). With this application, the applicant is requesting that the City rezone the 7.5 acre site from Highway Business (B-1) to Heavy Industrial (I-2). This site is being proposed for industrial development by the applicant. A map which provides the proposed rezoning of the site has been provided on Exhibit B. Exhibit C illustrates the proposed land use for the subject site and the surrounding area according to the approved 1990 draft Comprehensive Plan. A variety of light and heavy industrial activities have been the recommended land uses for the subject site. CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The Comprehensive Plan has set basic policies to guide the development of the City. The purpose of designating different areas for residential, commercial and industrial land uses is to promote the location of compatible land uses, as well as to prevent incompatible land uses from being located in close proximately to one another. The Zoning Ordinance is one of the legal means by which the City implements the Comprehensive Plan. Exhibit E provides a list of the uses, both permitted and conditional, that are allowed in the Highway Business (B-1) and Heavy Industrial (I-2). 2. The adopted 1990 draft Comprehensive Plan has designated this area for industrial development. This land use classification allows a variety of light and heavy industrial activities. Commercial activities are not allowed unless specifically mentioned in the zoning district. Housing is not allowed. 3. Exhibit D is the applicant's cover letter which describes the business activities of Princess Marble. The applicant is proposing to rezone Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1. Lot 1 is proposed for development immediately. Lots 2 and 3 are proposed to be developed sometime in the near future. Exhibit F illustrates the location of these 3 lots. Cretex Avenue was vacated in 1984. This vacation occurred in response to a request from Cretex Companies, Inc. to vacate the roadway in exchange for giving the City of Shakopee an easement needed to construct a frontage road for TH 101. Construction of the frontage road never occurred. 4. Due to the vacation of Cretex Avenue, the only direct access to Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, will be from TH 101. From a traffic safety perspective, this would not be acceptable. Therefore, staff recommended one of the following two alternatives: A) Detain the issuing of building permits for Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 until adequate access has been provided. B) The rededication of Cretex Avenue, with a condition prohibiting the development of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, by anyone other than the owner of Lot 1, Block 1, until Cretex Avenue is constructed. The applicant has recently submitted an application for the approval of a Minor Subdivision to consolidate the three lots into one lot. The application has been reviewed by staff, and the approval process is currently underway. The applicant is taking the necessary step to resolve the access issue with this Minor Subdivision application. 5. The Transportation Section of the draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan has designated TH 101 as an Intermediate Arterial. This roadway classification provides traffic movement with limited direct access. An intermediate arterial within the rural area of the City has the capacity to carry 5,000 to 15,000 vehicles per day. Access to the site from TH 101 is provided by a dedicated public road to the west of the subject site. 6. All departments and the applicable reviewing agencies have recommended approval of this request, and staff has not received any opposition. FINDINGS: Section 11.04, Subd. 7 of the City Code states that amendments changing the boundaries or regulations of any existing district shall not be issued indiscriminately, but shall be based on findings or criteria including, but not limited, the criteria listed below: Criteria #1 The original zoning ordinance was in error. Finding #1 The current zoning designation for the subject site is not in compliance with the land use plan and would therefore be in error. The applicant's request to rezone to the I-2 district would bring the site into conforming with the 2 Comprehensive Plan. Criteria #2 Significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place. Finding #2 The goals and policies for the Heavy Industrial Zoning District within the City of Shakopee have not changed. Criteria #3 Significant changes in City-wide or neighborhood development patterns have occurred. Finding #3 Significant changes in development patterns have not occurred which would effect the directions established in the Comprehensive Plan for this area. Criteria #4 The amendment is necessary to implement the Comprehensive Plan's growth management program. Finding #4 The rezoning of this parcel from Highway Business to Heavy Industrial would not be in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan's growth management program. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Rezone the subject site from Highway Business (B-1) to Heavy Industrial (I-2). 2. Do not rezone the subject site from Highway Business (B-1) to Heavy Industrial (I-2). 3. Table the decision to allow the applicant and/or staff to provide additional information. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has recommended Alternative No. 1, to rezone the subject site from Highway Business (B-1) to Heavy Industrial (I-2). ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Ordinance No. 379, an Ordinance of the City of Shakopee Amending the Zoning Map to Rezone a 7.5 Acre Site Located South of the Blue Lake Treatment Plant, on the South Side of T.H. 101, from Highway Business (B-1) to Heavy Industrial (I-2), and move its adoption. {C1 YCOUN'REZPRINC.621} 3 ORDINANCE NO. 379, FOURTH SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO REZONE A 7.5 ACRE SITE LOCATED SOUTH OF THE BLUE LAKE TREATMENT PLANT, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF T.H. 101 FROM HIGHWAY BUSINESS (B-1) TO HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (I-2). WHEREAS, on April 11, 1994, Sadi Alsadi, President of Princess Marble, submitted an application requesting rezoning from Highway Business (B-1) to Heavy Industrial (I-1) of 7.5 acres of land owned by them which is described as: Lot 1, Lot 2, and Lot 3, Block 1 Cretex Industrial Park 1st Addition; and WHEREAS, public hearings were held on May 5, 1994, and June 9, 1994, and notices duly sent and posted, and all persons appearing at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed this request at their public hearing on May 5, 1994, and June 9, 1994, and voted to recommend approval of the rezoning request to the City Council. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1 - That the zoning map adopted by reference in City Code Sec. 11.21 is hereby amended by rezoning the 7.5 acre site described as Lot 1, Lot 2, and Lot 3, Block 1 Cretex Industrial Park 1st Addition, from Highway Business (B-1) to Heavy Industrial (I-1)). Section 2 - Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the day of , 1994. EXHIBIT A � •• • r,-",n\ • • _\ •• . .! k • :. • • • • } • . • �- , • , /•� • • 3L':=• . • • .} ` • rte'• • • • . �. • • .•.. • ,. •�' '• • • • • •' • 12 2 SUBJECT SITE, .. il .. il . "1"1.111k - : '• r\ Urn . -: - 4' • < I• s�\�\` i --.1 12 \..r. , ` i' :.G AGRICULTURE %';A R1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL i R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL r :- . - R3 MID—DENSITY RES. R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. `.::1 i1 B1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS 't B2 COMMUNITY BUSINESS \ B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS • J , . 7 11 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL . • 'i -12 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL S SHORELAND .. ........ 1 FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT 11 • -'—•• MANDATORY PUD I _ RTD RACETRACK DISTRICT R1 ': _1Zoning. Map City of SHAKOPEE - . EXHIBIT B • . ' AG .> \ late'.._ •• . 'N • • •} _ --▪ .. ' �� . . • • • • • • • • • • • • - • •• , • • • • . . ., y: . • • �. . • •9I,'. • • '')7AG %. ' • i 12 i . SUBJECT SITE�;, . • • •� ' i' 7.G AGRICULTURE r•!; R1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL • `� R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL I T I I �' R3 MID-DENSITY RES. R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. '.;;,, B 1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS �1 B2 COMMUNITY BUSINESS B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS i \ )). .. 11 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 12 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL I S SHORELAND 77,7 FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT 11 \\ ';` -•-- MANDATORY PUD RTD RACETRACK DISTRICT R1 I.: Zoning Map City' of SHAKOPEE Ilr `' ,.♦ is ; e, r 1 —j , .,-,.—_-.--r- \\ 1 N —i iJ < < a l - - I 1. 'J (1 I _i U _ j • J> - - -- -- -— , Cl- t , • / 1 1 • _� I JI _ _� Oj1 . „/tI r^ � ' a "% M M0 G it o ,� 5 c ,� I. � 1,y - v I� I l �k��)//� :1�L--/ IL. 1 o fir1 ——.- V o / L_ J� c----7----/j.-71 �_ --J. . Y - - 1 , I-11 >; \ I_—il/1/ L �=` �I r� • • . • ' A r cj Ia 1 r�1- a �• I1I rte_// 1��� �vJ(_ ��' ' . I `'' • __ 4„.... ojli /% �r J r ow. I E N 1. co -__ - /' • L _,� � -• ,1 ��� s s• nnnn�•17.� � = I _ I I t � uuuu� o • J - W _.J ._ _ - ......_---_-,.-_-.=. � _ w-vz �. _ t. - - - urn — — o • C' - •- =. a _ S i,..0 e a E a . J c o . • `o V • O E • ••, E t E".1 - — --- - . V o p ' S ::4 uuuu : . .,,, . W = Te3:3 • s c o `• • i •O E _ - o u•. c • • • • 5 c o O C p '. e v, "2 • UUUIJ I) n \\ „ .f�.rrd 'it)R EXHIBIT "k! ""' DO \ \\ OOD\\ ARU c ASSO( IATE ' Industrial Cccn rncr.lal Real F'tct Mr. Lindberg Ekola, City Planner April 14, 1994 City Of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Re: Lots 1 -2-3 Block 1, Cretex Industrial Park First Addition Dear Mr. Ekola: In reference to your request regarding number six (6) in the application for zoning submitted by Mr. Sadi Alsadi, President of Princess Marble for the property owned by The Cretex Companies, Mr. Alsadi asked me to reply directly to you. Mr. Alsadi is out of town today, but felt that an immediate answer to your request was vital to adhere to it's construction timetable. Princess Marble is a designer and manufacturer of cultured marble and granite products consisting of bathroom vanities, shower stalls, and bathroom tubs. The process begins with the raw materials which are blended and placed into various forms, removed following a drying period, polished and installed in the homes at locations though-out the Metro area. The raw materials for the Princess Marble products are received by semi trailer at about one truck per working day or five (5) per week. The delivery and installation vehicle used by Princess Marble ore panel type pick-up trucks which are loaded at various time during the day for trips to designated locations. There are four delivery vehicles in operation at the present time. If you have any additional question please call me. Thank you. Sincerely,Ct3 o,L /lJ a-0-706c) 4..� 1815 West 152nd Street • Burnsville.Minnesota 5533- • 612/435-5031 NFNMER SOCIETY OF I]DI:STRIAL A'.D UFFI(:E REAITORS . 2 9 EXHIBIT SEC. 11.29. HIGHWAY BUSINESS (B-1). Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Highway Business District is to recognize development op::.rtunity and need for commercial establishments fronting on or with immediate access to major hig`.vays. Permitted land uses should take advantage of the highway access in a manner which other business districts are not afforded. Also acceptable are quasi-industrial and wholesale enterprises that do not meet an industrial setting and have considerable customer contact. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. Within any Highway Business District, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: A. Motels, motor hotels, hotels (lot must have 400 square feet per unit). B. Drive-in retail business. C. Repealed. D. Churches. E. Restaurants, Class I. F. Retail business. G. Liquor stores. H. Essential services. I. Offices and banks. J. Car washes. K. Service establishments. L. Auto sales, service and repair businesses. M. Wholesale businesses. N. Class II day care facilities when located in the home of the day care provider. Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. Within any Highway Business District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: A. Repealed. B. Taverns. C. Animal hospitals and veterinary clinics. D. Open sales lots. 1 P43 ed. 1260 5 . 1 . 29 E. Funeral homes. F. Supply yards. G. Public buildings. H. Motor fuel stations. I. Dwellings when combined with a permitted use, not on first floor. J. Class II restaurant: K. Cultural and fraternal institutions. L. Funeral homes. M. Major and minor commercial recreation. N. Bed and Breakfast Inn, subject to the following conditions: 1. The establishment must comply with State Health and Building Code requirements. 2. Only guests shall be served. 3. The facility shall be limited to five guest rooms or a maximum guest • capacity of ten. 4. The building must be at least 75 years old. 5. Guest stay shall be limited to thirty (30) days. 6. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with the parking requirements of this Chapter. A minimum of one space per guest room and one space for the operator shall be required. 7. Signage shall be in accordance with the provisions of the City Code regulating signs. O. Class I day care facility. P. Class II day care facilities when not located in the home of the day care provided. Subd. 4. Permitted Accessory Uses. Within any Highway Business District the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses: A. Any incidental repair or processing necessary to conduct a permitted principal use. B. Private garages, off-street. . 1493 ed. 1261 § ' 1 . 29 C. Parking, loading spaces. D. Temporary construction buildings. E. Decorative landscape features. F. Public telephone booths. G. Other accessory uses customarily appurtenant to a permitted use. Subd. 5. Lot Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements. A. No building shall exceed 2 stories or 25 feet. B. Minimum Lot Area: 9,000 square feet. C. Minimum Lot Width: 60 feet. D. Front Yard Setback: 30 feet. E. Side Yard Setback: 20 feet. F. Rear Yard Setback: 30 feet. G. Minimum Setback from a side or rear residential zoned area: 75 feet. H. If more than one building, an open space equal to 1/2 the sum of the heights of • the two buildings must be provided between the buildings. 1. Design shall include adequate internal circulation not less than 22 feet wide exclusive of required parking. J. Curb cuts shall not exceed 24 feet in width. K. The entire area shall be landscaped, occupied by building or parking areas so treated as to control dust. Should the development be undertaken in stages, all of the area required to conform to that portion undertaken shall be developed to meet the preceding requirements. L. A drainage plan shall be designed and approved for the area with such on-site construction as determined necessary by the City Engineer to adequately handle all drainage. M. Whereas a B-1 use abuts or is acrossthe street from an "R" District, a fence or compact evergreen hedge not less than 75% opaque, not over 6 feet in height, nor less than 3-1/2 feet (except when adjacent to a street where it shall be not higher than 3 feet) in height, shall be erected and maintained in the front yard portion of the lot and along the side or rear on the property line that abuts or is across the street from the"R" District Said screening may be erected in the front yard, but if desired it shall not exceed 3 feet in height. 7543 ea. • 1262 § 11 . 33 SEC. 11.33. HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (1-2). Subd. 1. Purpose. The Heavy Industry District is where a full complement of urban services • exist such as water, sewer, rail and highway transportation to provide support for intense manufacturing and processing operations. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. Within any Heavy Industrial District, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: A. All permitted uses in I-1. B. Repealed. C. Railroad operations. D. Motor freight terminals. E. Manufacturing, fabrication, processing, assembly/storage of: 1. Light chemicals. 2. Lumber and wood products. 3. Paper products. 4. Rock and stone products. 5. Textiles. . . 6. Tobacco products. 7. Fabrication metal products. 8. Machinery and appliances. 9. Transportation equipment. 10. Apparel. 11. Food products. 12. Glass. 13. Leather. 14. Pottery. F. Assembly/storage of: 1. Light chemicals. 1993.d. (f 1340 § 11 . 33 2. Heavy chemicals. i) 3. Explosives. 4. Residential accessory. G. Restaurants (Class I and II), taverns, private lodges and clubs and supper clubs, but only when part of a Class A licensed horse racetrack as provided for in MSA 240.01 et seq. H. Commercial recreation major. I. Class II day care facility when located in the home of the day care provider. Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. Within any Heavy Industrial District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: A. Manufacturing, processing or storage of explosive material. B. Heavy chemical storage and manufacturing including petroleum, chlorine, creosote, glue, acid, fertilizer, asphalt production, soaps. C. Structures in excess of 45 feet in height D. Paper and pulp mills. • E. Meat or fish packing. F. Rock crushing or gravel work. G. Concrete and ready mix plants. - - H. Foundry, forge, casting, metal. • • I. Heliports, airports. J. Repealed. K. Grain elevators. L. Water and sewage treatment M. Mining and excavation industries. N. Retail sales and displays in front yards when necessary to a permitted principal use carried on in a structure located on the premises but the area so used shall not exceed 15 percent of the floor area of said principal structure. O. Commercial recreation, minor. • 411, 1993 sa . .. 1341 • 11 . 33 P. Animal hospitals and veterinary clinics. Q. Class I day care facility. R. Class II day care facilities when not located in the home of the day care provider. S. Retail sales and rentals of recreational vehicles which are licensed by the state, including camper trailers. As an accessory use, the property also may sell vehicles taken in on trade for the sale of a recreational vehicle. Retail sales and rentals shall be allowed only when the following conditions are met in addition to all others required under this ordinance: 1. On parcels located at the intersection of an arterial street with another arterial or with a collector street, or within 200 feet of such an intersection, and clearly visible from both streets; 2. On parcels with a minimum size of 5 acres and a maximum size of 10 acres. The conditional use permit shall be granted only for the minimum area necessary to operate the proposed use; 3. No parking or structures, other than signs, shall be allowed in the required front and street side yard setbacks, which shall be landscaped as provided in Section 11.60; 4. No more than thirty-five percent (35%) of the parcel shall be covered by structures; 5. Driveway, parking areas, and outdoor storage areas shall be paved with a material to control dust and drainage; 6. No more than two curb cuts shall be allowed per street frontage for any site if allowed by the appropriate governmental agency; 7. All exterior surfaces, including fences, building walls, and roofs, shall be constructed of compatible building materials and finished in compatible colors and textures with buildings on adjacent properties; 8. Outside storage is prohibited except as specifically approved in the conditional use permit; • 9. In addition to other limitations placed on signs in the City Code, the following signs or advertising are prohibited: balloons, pennants, banners, flashing lights, and similar signs or objects designed to attract attention; signs painted directly on a building; signs located in a building window; signs located in or on a vehicle (other than the manufacturer's - identification); roof signs; and temporary signs. A site plan showing sign location and a sketch or photograph of all proposed signs must be • approved in the conditional use permit= - • 1342 : , . . - • __ ._ _.. 1: r• }^ 1130 13npOS ..,ttz2CI,,1N33.•,•.'dA•1% lZ 1 r. }yr: M�....Ai, I Q • ;," ▪ •.,.•:1 A:,.. ,..,. .'V t r 1 "i-A, f' 1 � . :::::;:ifi*.1�;{t„far. Ali; 0 :. .41, :.,.•.47.1. • f W..'' • , .,.„., , ti'.4:1•!.,-.4)4!: rel N •t Z • CI/ /O 04Js 2 2 I1 Q • . .%. o- i E..° Q .! _CC r° Cl A. 1 I >D. 1 Ww V...2... N .-• —. IA N A p IA f� O 00 / j v� w p 2 a I- p a Cr • o V Q V /s. C �� a W/, Q F 1 J2 2 W W Y C • • rJ 'eSLyl c )1.10Y/ll, ,O A113 O _..011f ._— • __ • 2 2 '(•) N Y 3 Z A I�m /z .b CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Julie Baumann, Planning Intern RE: Concurrent Preliminary and Final Plat for Monnens Addition DATE: June 16, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Monnens Custom Builders have submitted applications for approval of both the Preliminary and Final Plat for Monnens Addition. The proposed subdivision is located on the east side of Market Street, south of 5th Avenue. The area is zoned R-2, Urban Residential. (See Exhibit A.) The proposed plat is 29,640 square feet in area, and consists of 2 lots. At their June 9, 1994, meeting, the Shakopee Planning Commission recommended approval of both the Preliminary and Final Plat for Monnens Addition, subject to conditions. CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan has designated this area for single family residential development. This land use category allows detached housing on parcels of approximately 9,000 to 12,000 square feet in size. It includes locations already developed, as well as locations for new plats. 2. The development contains 2 lots which are 14,820 square feet in area. Both of the lots meet the dimension and area requirements for development with single family homes, or with two family dwellings. The applicant is proposing to develop both lots with single family homes. 3. Access to the lots will be directly from Market Street. Market Street has been designated as a local street within the draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan. 4. The developer is not required to obtain an NPDES Permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, as the development is less than 5 acres in size. 5. The Engineering Department has commented that Lot 1 has sewer and water to it, however Lot 2 does not. In order to install City services to Lot 2, a street cut permit is required. Since Market Street is less than 5 years old, the City Council must approve the street cut. The Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council approve a permit for work in the right-of-way with the approval of this plat. 6. The Building Official has commented that the applicant must provide on-site observation and compaction testing of house pads by a registered professional soils engineer. 1 7. The applicant has informed staff that there are no wetlands on this site, and staff has verified this claim. Staff is in the process of issuing a Certificate of Exemption to the Wetlands Act of 1991 to the property owner. 8. Since the subject site is not identified as a future park site in the City's draft Comprehensive Plan, Staff is recommending that a Park Dedication Fee be collected in lieu of park land. Using the assessed value from the Scott County Assessor's Office in the calculation, the Park Dedication requirement would be $1,050.00 per lot. The dedication of land for park purposes is made at the time of the platting of the land, and cash payments are due prior to the final approval of the plat by the City Council. The developer for this proposed plat has submitted a request to defer the Park Dedication payments to the time of the issuance of the Building Permit. Staff recommended that the deferring of the park dedication to the building permit time frame be approved. 9. If the developer wishes a one year delay in the requirement to set the iron monuments for the plat, a request for such a delay must be submitted. A condition could be recommended which allows the developer to delay the setting of the iron monuments for the plat for one year from the date of the recording of the final plat. The City would require that the developer provide adequate financial guarantees to ensure compliance within the one year time frame. 10. There are special assessments against this property. The City Engineer will reapportion these assessments against the lots and the developer will waive his right to appeal the reapportionment. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has recommended approval of both the Preliminary and Final Plat for Monnens Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the Final Plat: A. Approval of the title opinion by the City Attorney. B. Execution of a Developer's Agreement for the following requirements: a. The Park Dedication Requirement shall be a cash payment in lieu of park land. Park dedication fees shall be deferred on a lot by lot basis and are to be paid prior to the release of each principal structure building permit. 2 b. The City Engineer will reapportion the existing special assessments against the lots and the developer shall waive his right to appeal the reapportionment. C. A permit for work in the right-of-way is hereby approved to allow City utility services to be provided to Lot 2. 2. The following must be completed prior to the approval of Building Permits for the site: A. The applicant shall provide on-site observation and compaction testing of house pads by a registered soils engineer when native soils are displaced, or when building sites are filled, if needed, as determined by the Building Official. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4031, a Resolution Approving the Preliminary and Final Plats for Monnens Addition, and move its adoption. {CrrYCOUNTFPMONEN.621} 3 RESOLUTION NO. 4031, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLATS FOR MONNENS ADDITION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee did recommend approval of both the Preliminary and Final Plats for Monnens Addition on June 9, 1994, and have recommended their approval; and WHEREAS, all notices of the public hearing have been duly sent and posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, as follows: That the Preliminary and Final Plats for Monnens Addition, described as: The Northerly one half of the following described tract: Commencing at a point 1008 1/2 feet East of Southwest corner of the northwest Quarter of Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 115, Range 22; thence running due West 2.19 chains on the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 300 feet; thence East 2.19 chains; thence South 300 feet to the place of beginning; also: The Northerly One Half of the following described tract lying East of Market Street as now established by the City of Shakopee; Commencing on the South line of the Northwest Quarter of Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 115,Range 22,Scott County,Minnesota,at a point 574 feet East of the West line of said Section; thence East on said South line of said Section 290 feet; thence North 300 feet; thence West 290 feet; thence South 300 feet to the place of beginning. is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the Final Plat: A. Approval of the title opinion by the City Attorney. B. Execution of a Developer's Agreement for the following requirements: a. The Park Dedication Requirement shall be a cash payment in lieu of park land. Park dedication fees shall be deferred on a lot by lot basis and are to be paid prior to the release of each principal structure building permit. b. The City Engineer will reapportion the existing special assessments against the lots and the developer shall waive his right to appeal the reapportionment. C. A permit for work in the right-of-way is hereby approved to allow City utility services to be provided to Lot 2. 2. The following must be completed prior to the approval of Building Permits for the site: A. The applicant shall provide on-site observation and compaction testing of house pads by a registered soils engineer when native soils are displaced, or when building sites are filled, if needed, as determined by the Building Official. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Plat and Developer's Agreement. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this _day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney EXI-IIBIT A / hwc _ .r, $ t l�- � y _ — - " ‘ = �1 '., , 1. .1------_,- '� ce' �� .,.-rte !\ , ., -� 1 , , ..--- . c = � ----� 1 SUBJECT SITE >i • !, 317,= I, .1 . .: au; R3L - � a �_ , • , toe .383i, '3101 7" '3;3 ' 778 ', , i,.. ■ �i \ 1 . \\. \ II. A . \ 1 t i , . I 1 •ae I .1 NI i 1 1 i I .• I '• , "ZZ • —�'_ J • am-- . I 1-- . , a r.Po 1 "ca �—. AG AGRICULTURE ' ' •" ' 1 F 7 , 1 ----, R1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL j • I \ , ' . I' ' , • ' l R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL ,-.--.---7--- =:1 Y` 1 `,! i, , 't 17; �T [ R3 MID-DENSITY RES. C . : • [ R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. _ _: • 31 3 y' �, u�; . B1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS - ' ' Z' ' a �T ; ' '' B2 COMMUNITY BUSINESS • �-.,o ! : '-- B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS t' .\.-/- , -2- JJ404 PQM ". 1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL �`- �',''�� . . -. voICSIX ; 1 r . , '� Ili `;• • !2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL / -- •\77. �,;1 , : ,��. tl S SHORELAND • ____ ; R4 FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT `t , '---- _ - ___ 1 -'-•• MANDATORY PUD •=`�:�f r i �„L.-, _ B �1 RTD RACETRACK DISTRICT -.-�_.-. " - ` ? ' ! - 7•) . --.-,..-.• :- V . .. N. 1 .tel Zoning Map City of SHAKOPEE t. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT MONNENS ADDITION Photographs taken by Julie Baumann, Planning Intern May 23, 1994 View of Site from Market Street facing East _ r ..::---1 .1:-. .. .....or I 1 7 kt.. .sik... -1,, , . . , .-.„ :-.11_. .4e :a ^I s :;4 Vi .: ' • IA. :. . Zar _:! • "w. ,./ - .� • ,sa _..... .. -1 gassielaitainwelerca • • • ii •`+ • EE S 11 i I JI i Q ti i __ ,• p5 u • y g I 1 1 5 g 5 t r a 119 i 1 t tz x3 N •; a .: ii- •s m ' g •• sit ° ;, Zi • O.:. j I I I I 3 I t .••. f•.•- 5� aY" • ' _ • 3 Z. s ='� •3 • :3's tC ' a > i =t =;=:�91.`. . : ; - � z1! . :. 11: - a I`! ^Ias : I .' . v 33.'7 S � `jI: ` 45 i a 1 i a ;s i. . `.7 a I. '9;Z f i 3■LI,bZ.O N 00'041 " a .5":3 ': tY • 4 00'04 00.04 —Q 0.3 1� a .1 : _...5!i'„ . 1 . II N I a 12 as �; . t...1 =° 'i II• 17? . j,2 . ! .. . ; €riI = Ila - 1 :I I I _ • : -J -s .11191 €i a b : 'I I I a ! ! ' � 'y � 3 =! , a 13 I,�; zI I I a "3a: aal, II I! I > =I I11_,i � e ;;' ,• ` I I I I A J !I , � 2. �9 i > ,• s ' • 1001 I v v aha :•:.1.� 9 l•• $Y 4 Y f_19 D' I � I I 10 cep is �I i3 141 � �; 8� I il: s: 000% 2 - I, Z 15 3,11,1,Z.0 N 00'041j a'., 4-•.; 1172: HWrS Iqury p gull 1.13 11 ! a,3 .1.e_ 3: 2 . . • ••• 3 Cno elit aYE�3 a ;2� 's 7' ! 'a z^ • u e: 'Pap: 1G�' ti !Y ' 1; Q • Z $z^ "� ! 71' 6 :3 r.. r {SF• AP - i •• .,' • r.;l•. r.• K raf ; :Wel •r n +'s 8 tir; 9 Il .• i.:.• . ,, . --__11: _,----Z. 9r s=r,.i I U ii ii 1 1 rKaci! fia D it ; Ft �� itgs` df3 ! �l r �� a ca .r ' Fa flip,: F all r rq. 4. Ei •� i!lx s.-.a E wi,TneN $ewFR7 EI • _ $ = t of ;( / — xZ of `§z...-F: lfFi a f �i7 g iv!,;Rrr 4-77--• I ;3. o�+ •� :L E���.�. �j'� Tc X17.' Ci 2f.rS t ' ' " ( (•••Ms/ T r 1 '[C 1 a y 1 t) � w�. `F•.I II :toy!, Slri• :• ' ^r :- r- 1> . ` f :.1i.1Q .`� ••' �!� \.�Q: . Q• 17' r t[yrJ'. ,: D t ar . 1 mute .? i1 fr.,. r., �a g •'a too r zv 3r �6 LE g i=cif gill _� ,— r.N ff, �' S' - r e9 4187 .AL 'i 44c I SI '`_ g °I i'. 15 •(n /: i 3nr •i It I!. a I" , r +r 'i .0 ppi. it -f : I Li .. ;IC ppf .r n JI N f � i p? I • `°'• . .' OM t� El(nor a li:vi n `Fli ;1 ' "�. I ..'t 4' a� I roe I _ 0 W➢Vi I i ^E 11 s[ 11. 1 : ao .1 g. • I I I 0 f - ! :iv- Fr;, '; N S i y�›. ' •I I� a 7:' /m–V + ; 1 :a.9i it !;E ' r a • 4�v / f c, � • ' 1':i 1 _ �. j ,I ° ;t �„,y 7 �, , yi' $/ e I iT 1 _-.rri. Z 0 4s- 3) l./, , .a :2 I m'DI —c 3 A rt a5 illi Will. HE P�,11 c cit 's o a.IIH 00• N •' ' ' jtH Si 6 (qt' • / LZ D J rn .� 1 ^ ,-4 t o11 , ' afpq jri r Psi 100/ !, "Ali• a, ?I `0'i �° CI3 11 g I . 1 D Lr ! ij ! t` 9D ''7 1 i: i. lip i at t► SfC ! -g tOOP a �`,_L :Jill !1 a VI' �o _a a3 a c -9 l i31 ? L lei _ .. Q . ,, ? • rFfF 1 E i if 1"? .2.7 1 T rt 2t. E ' 1• • 7 v all MI 1 f D I co O A .. 2 II 1 i111 i 1 i E I 9 0- q 4 1.1 f Y E15 P ..1i a � g P.4% P ?I:.1 i, E I! r I Y 0 I ! a = gig g�5 r.7 r 1 i i4• f �Ty JJ 9 L r i Q p N I sF ! a o i. _ '' E d a N . I ! I S i F � ' nfl ! ^ c i. s F o P t if v s .a a l la Q L - as i. D l 2, c CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner RE: Planned Unit Development: Preliminary and Final Development Plans for Scherer South DATE: June 16, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Scherer Brothers Lumber has submitted applications for approval of both the Preliminary Development Plan and the Final Development Plan for proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Scherer South. The proposed PUD is to be located on the north side of 4th Avenue, and west of the existing Certain-teed site. At their June 9, 1994, meeting, the Shakopee Planning Commission recommended approval of both the Preliminary and Final Development Plans for the proposed Scherer South PUD, subject to conditions. BACKGROUND: The proposed development covers 22.5 acres and is proposed to be constructed on undeveloped land located south of TH 101, north of 4th Avenue, and west of the existing Certain-teed property. The subject site is zoned Heavy Industrial (I-2). (See Exhibit A.) With this application, the applicant is requesting approval of the PUD to construct five (5) structures on one parcel of land, and approval to construct a fence 8 feet in height. The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) section of the Zoning Ordinance is to encourage innovation, variety and creativity in the site planning process. A developer may obtain greater development flexibility through variances negotiated in the PUD review process provided that amenities beneficial to the public are created with the proposal. Greater protection of important natural features, preserving open space, and providing a quality environment are often the means in which a developer can negotiate flexibility from the standard zoning ordinance regulations. Zoning district standards may be negotiated and variances from district requirements granted by the City as part of the PUD process. The applicant is requesting three (3) variances with this proposed PUD. However, the following restrictions shall apply to the granting of variances by PUD: A. Fire and Safety. No variances shall be negotiated which in any way violate the fire and safety codes of the City. B. Exterior Streets and Yards. No reduction in yard requirements shall be permitted adjacent to exterior property lines or exterior public streets. 1 C. Interior Streets. No building shall be located less than fifteen (15) feet from the back of the curb lines along interior streets that are to be maintained by the City. D. Off-Street Parking. No variances shall be negotiated from off-street parking except as specifically provided for in Section 11.05, Subd. 3. E. Open Spaces. No variances shall be negotiated which will result in less open space than is required by the zoning district. This includes yard requirements. Residential PUD' shall provide at least twenty (20) percent of the project area as open space. CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan has designated this area for Industrial development. This land use category allows a variety of light and heavy industrial activities, such as assembly, warehousing, wholesale distribution and sales, manufacturing, research and development, and office activities. Commercial activities would not be allowed unless specifically mentioned in the zoning districts which implement this land use plan category. In contrast, the Commercial designation includes retail and service businesses which sell primarily to individual customers, but not to other businesses. The Commercial designation does not include manufacturing, warehousing, trucking, or businesses which utilize extensive outdoor storage of goods or materials. 2. The subject site is currently zoned Heavy Industrial (I-2). The purpose of the Heavy Industrial Zoning District is to provide a full complement of urban services (such as water, sewer, rail, and highway transportation) to provide support for intense manufacturing and processing operations. 3. In order to develop the site as proposed, the applicant will need to receive approval of the following variances from the Zoning Ordinance: A. Section 11.03, Subd. 3.C, regarding Lot Provisions, which states, "Except in the case of planned developments as provided for hereinafter, not more than one principal building shall be located on a lot". B. Section 11.33, Subd. 3.N, states that "retail sales and displays are allowed as a Conditional Use when they are necessary to a permitted principal use carried on in a structure located on the premises, but the area so used shall not exceed 15 percent of the principal structure".* C. Section 11.05, Subd. 4.B, regarding Fences, which states, "Fences in excess of the above heights shall require a Conditional Use Permit".* * NOTE: Section 11.40, Subd. 3, allows the PUD procedure to be used in lieu of the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 2 In reviewing the variances requested with this commercial PUD, the City Council should consider the purposes for using the PUD option. The purpose of a PUD is to encourage innovation, variety, and creativity in site planning, and to encourage the planning of entire ownerships of land as a unit. Commercial PUDs are different from residential PUDs, in that the items that are traded for variances are different. No open space is required for a commercial PUD, and no natural features are to be retained on this site. In the PUD review process, the Planning Commission considered screening and landscaping for the more intensive storage activities proposed for the site. Sheet 2 of 9 illustrates the paved surfaces on the site. Based on the extensive pavement area, outdoor storage and handling of materials will consume a majority of the site. Much of the paved area will be visible to Hwy. 101. Section 11.60, Subd. 3 requires screening for outdoor storage, parking areas, trash handling facilities and rooftop mechanical equipment. Screening can be accommodated by berms, vegetation or fences with a preference for landscaping and architectural site design. Section 11.60, Subd. 7 requires landscaping along public rights-of-way. A minimum of one major deciduous tree (2 1/2" diameter) is required every 50 feet. Generally, the Zoning Ordinance screening and landscaping requirements are addressed in detail during the building permit review. The landscape plan (Sheet 5 of 9) illustrates the proposed landscaping and fence screening for the subject site. No new landscaping had been proposed along the perimeter of the site. Staff recommended that a revised landscape plan be submitted which more adequately addresses the visibility of the outdoor storage/material handling areas on the site from Hwy. 101. A revised Landscape Plan has been received and approved by the Planning Department. 4. The applicant is proposing to construct the following structures on the site. The first phase would include all of the structures listed below. However, some of them would be smaller to begin with and expanded at a later date. For more detail regarding these structures, please refer to the applicant's cover letter on Exhibit B: A. Office Building. The applicant originally proposed a two story office structure which included a 2,230 square foot hardware sales area and a 1,530 square foot display area. The applicant has since reduced this to a one story structure. Millwork/Warehouse. A single story structure, 64,000 square feet in area, used as a millwork warehouse. Closed Dock. Loading dock and a connecting link between the office and millwork / warehouse structure, 3,299 square feet in area. B. Garage. A single story, 4,800 square foot structure, used for light maintenance, washing, and parts storage. 3 C. Warehouse. A single story structure 30,000 square feet in area, used for cold storage for roofing, siding, and related hardware. D. Covered Storage. 24,800 square feet of covered storage, open on one side only. The back of this structure will form perimeter screening and fencing for the site. E. President Homes. A warehouse, 2,400 square feet in side, and 4,800 square feet of open loading docks. To include a small office and restroom facility. At the June 9, 1994, meeting of the Planning Commission, the applicant submitted a a revised site plan which proposes to reduce the amount of covered storage along the west property line, and adding it to the area along the east property line. This covered storage area, along with the "President Homes" structure and a dock, is being proposed to be connected to the garage, covered storage, and warehouse structures along the east property line, located as proposed in the original submittal. Since the applicant did not submit an 11" x 17" copy of this revision, staff is unable to provide the revised site plan in your Agenda Packets. However, a larger version will be available at the June 21, 1994, meeting of the City Council. In addition to these changes on the site plan, the applicant has informed staff that the proposed office will be a one story structure, instead of the two story structure originally proposed. 5. The applicant is proposing to develop a warehouse / wholesale operation which provides building materials to commercial builders. The applicant is also proposing a retail use with this project. Section 11.33, Subd. 3.N states that retail sales and displays are allowed as a Conditional Use when they are necessary to a permitted principal use carried on in a structure located on the premises, but the area so used shall not exceed 15 percent of the principal structure. Information from the applicant describing the applicant's retail sales and display area has been attached as Exhibit C. The office, dock, millwork / warehouse building serves as the principal structure on the subject site. The applicant's submittal, labeled Floor Plan: Office Dock, Millwork / Warehouse (A-3), identifies 3,760 square feet of retail (display and hardware) area within this proposed structure. The calculations as per Section 11.33, Subd. 3.N would be as follows: Office (First Floor / Phase I only) 11,400' sq. Closed Dock (40' x 80') 3,200' sq. Millwork / Warehouse (160' x 240') 36,600' sq. Total Area of Principal Structure 51,200' sq. 3.760' sq. Total Retail Proposed by Applicant 51,200 'sq. Total Area of Principal Structure = 7.35% of Structure 4 A cover letter has been submitted by the applicant and has been attached as Exhibit B. The construction of the entire site is scheduled to be completed and fully operational by the spring of 1995. 6. In the applicant's cover letter, as well as on the Site/ Utility Plan for Phase 1 (Sheet No. 3) the applicants state that they would like to install cyclone type fencing at a 7 foot height, with an additional foot of barbed wire, for a total fence height of 8 feet. The construction of fences within the City requires the approval of a Building Permit. Section 11.05, Subd. 4 regulates fences. This portion of the City Code states that fences six feet an under are permitted anywhere on a lot, except in the front yard setback. Fences up to 3 feet in height are allowed within the front yard setback. Fences in excess of these heights require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Section 11.40, Subd. 3, allows the PUD procedure to be used in lieu of the Conditional Use Permit procedure. Therefore, the applicant is requesting approval for a fence 8 feet in height with this application for approval of the PUD. However, the portion of the fence proposed to be constructed of barbed wire will not be permitted. 7. A railroad spur will be extended into the property from the north to provide transportation of the bulk of the materials to be stored at the site. 8. Historically, the clientele for Scherer Bros. Lumber is 85% professional builders and remodelers, and 15% consumers. Approximately 80% of the materials leaving the site will be on Scherer Bros. Lumber trucks. The estimated traffic generation would be: A. Employees: 40 @ 2 trip/day = 80 B. Company Trucks: 8 @ 6 trips/day = 48 C. Incoming Semi Trucks: 4 @ 2 trip/day = 6 D. Customers: 30 @ 2 trip/day = 60 Total Estimated Trips per day = 196 9. The large size of the parcel should provide adequate parking for the proposed use. In addition, the applicant is proposing to implement flexible split time beginning and ending hours to minimize the traffic impact. The applicant is proposing to be open during normal business hours 5 days per week, and currently has no plans for expansion into week-end hours. The information on Exhibit C provides the calculations resulting in the number of required stalls by the proposed development, and the locations for both the employee parking areas and customer parking areas have been provided on the site plan. 10. In the applicant's cover letter, they state that they will be requesting permits for two permanent freestanding signs for the proposed use: one on the north side of the side identifying the location from TH 101; and one near 4th Avenue at the customer entrance. The applicant has also submitted a Comprehensive Sign Plan which shows two 5 proposed freestanding signs, three directional signs at the entrances to the site, and a wall sign. Upon the initial review of the proposed signage, they do not appear to meet the requirements of Section 4.30, the Shakopee Sign Ordinance. Staff has informed the sign company that is working for the applicant that these signs will require the approval of Sign Permits from the City of Shakopee and must meet the requirements of Section 4.30, Subd. 4. Staff has discussed the requirements with the sign company, and has provided a copy of the portion of the Sign Ordinance applicable to the Heavy Industrial Zoning District. 11. Shakopee Public Utilities (SPUC) has commented that water service to the site is available, subject to their standard terms and conditions, including a tank water charge at $612.00 per acre, and a water connection charge of $400.00 per unit. Electrical services are available subject to their standard terms and conditions. 12. The Fire Chief has commented that the site will require one more hydrant, and each must flow 1,500 gallons when both are in use. The hydrant will be required to be located on the east side of the office building and parking lot. The applicant has been in contact with the Fire Department regarding the exact location required for this hydrant. 13. Scott County Environmental Health (SCEH) has reviewed the proposal and commented that the surface water management plans look good. They suggested that the applicant contact their office (612-496-8177) regarding Hazardous Waste license issues. 14. At their meeting on May 17, 1994, the City Council ordered a feasibility study to be completed for the proper conveyance and ponding of stormwater. The current stormwater is ultimately discharged onto private property owned by Certainteed. This is unacceptable unless there is an easement to do this, or if Certainteed agrees to accept the discharge water. If the stormwater issue is resolved in this manner, there will be no need to continue with the feasibility study. Staff is recommending a condition making the approval of the Preliminary and Final Development Plans contingent upon the resolution of the stormwater issues. 15. The applicant has stated that the private sanitary sewer easements between the property owner to the west and Scherer Bros. has been completed and will be executed. A condition has been recommended requiring the applicant to submit verification that the private sanitary sewer easements between the property owner to the west and Scherer Bros. have been completed and executed. 16. The 8" watermain proposed for the site is to be private. A backflow preventer and water meter will be located in the garage. The existing 1" water service line in 4th Avenue to Scherer South will be disconnected and plugged at the 12" main. Verification of easements for this service line must also be submitted. 6 17. The applicant has stated that the Stormwater Management Plan has been submitted to the Lower Minnesota Watershed District, and was approved at their meeting on May 11, 1994. The Planning Commission has recommended a condition requiring that verification of this approval be submitted to the City prior to the approval of the Final Development Plan for the PUD. As of the writing of this staff report, staff has not received this verification. Staff is recommending that Condition No. 3.B of the Planning Commission recommendation be amended to read as follows: "Verification of the approval of the Stormwater Management Plan by the Lower Minnesota Watershed District must be submitted to the City prior to the recording of the Final Development Plan for the PUD by the Scott County Recorder's Office". 18. The approval of a NPDES Permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is required for the site. The applicant will be required to submit verification that they have complied with this regulations, including, but not limited to the following: A. Submitting a temporary erosion and sedimentation plan; B. Submitting a permanent erosion and sedimentation plan; C. Following the MPCA Standards for the above; D. Submit documentation that the requirements for the sedimentation pond will be met; and E. Submit verification that the NPDES permit has been applied for and a copy of the MPCA "Notice of Storm Water Permit Coverage". Verification that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has approved the NPDES Stormwater Permit for the proposed development will be required prior to the recording of the Final Development Plan. 19. The applicant has informed staff that there are no wetlands on the site, and staff has verified this claim. Staff is in the process of issuing a Certificate of Exemption to the . Wetlands Act of 1991 to the property owner. 20. The proposed railroad spur crosses the VIP sewer. The applicant shall construct a concrete reinformed slab (20' x 24' x 18" thick) beneath the railroad spur ballast to protect the existing 27" RCP CL 3 sanitary sewer. Calculations verifying this design have been provided for staff's review. The easement for the VIP sewer should be shown on the Preliminary and Final Development Plans, as well as the Preliminary and Final Plats. 21. There are existing special assessments against this property which have been deferred until the time of the issuance of the Building Permit. 7 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the Preliminary and Final Development Plans for the proposed Scherer South Planned Unit Development, subject to conditions. 2. Do not approve the Preliminary and Final Development Plans. 3. Table the decision and allow time for the applicant or staff to provide additional information. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has recommended the approval of both the Preliminary and Final Development Plans (Alternative No. 1), subject to the following conditions: 1. The following variances from the Zoning Ordinance are approved: A. Section 11.03, Subd.3.C, regarding Lot Provisions, which states, "Except in the case of planned developments as provided for hereinafter, not more than one principal building shall be located on a lot". The approval of this PUD allows the following buildings to be constructed on the subject site: a. Office Building. A one story office structure which includes a 2,230 square foot hardware sales area and a 1,530 square foot display area. Millwork/Warehouse. A single story structure, 64,000 square feet in area, used as a millwork warehouse. Closed Dock. Loading dock and connecting link between office and millwork / warehouse structure, 3,299 square feet in area. b. Garage. A single story, 4,800 square foot structure, used for light maintenance, washing, and parts storage. c. Warehouse. A single story structure 30,000 square feet in area, used for cold storage for roofing, siding, and related hardware. d. Covered Storage. 24,800 square feet of covered storage, open on one side only. The back of this structure will form perimeter screening and fencing for the site. e. President Homes. A warehouse, 2,400 square feet in side, and 4,800 square feet of open loading docks. To include a small office and restroom facility. B. Section 11.05, Subd. 4.B, regarding Fences, which states, "Fences in excess of the above heights shall require a Conditional Use Permit" (or approval through a PUD). The approval of this PUD allows a fence, eight (8) feet in height, to be constructed on the subject site. The fence shall be located within the areas designated on the site plans. Barbed wire fences shall not be permitted on the site. 8 C. Section 11.33, Subd. 3.N, states that "retail sales and displays are allowed as a Conditional Use when they are necessary to a permitted principal use carried on in a structure located on the premises, but the area so used shall not exceed 15 percent of the principal structure". The PUD shall comply with the requirements of Section 11.33, Subd. 3.N. The office, dock, and millwork / warehouse building serves as the principal structure on the subject site. The applicant's submittal identifies 3,760 square feet of retail (display and hardware) area within this proposed structure. Retail operations shall be limited to Monday through Friday from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. The calculations as per Section 11.33, Subd. 3.N would be as follows: Office (First Floor / Phase I only) 11,400' sq. Closed Dock (40' x 80') 3,200' sq. Millwork / Warehouse (160' x 240') 36.600' sq. Total Area of Principal Structure 51,200' sq. 3.760' sq. Total Retail Proposed by Applicant 51,200 'sq. Total Area of Principal Structure = 7.35% of Structure 2. The following procedural actions must be taken: A. A Development Agreement stating the conditions of approval of the Planned Unit Development must be filed with the Scott County Recorder. B. A Major Subdivision plat must be approved and recorded for the subject site. 3. The following must be approved prior to approval of the Preliminary and Final Development Plans by the City Council: A. The Stormwater Management Plan, including the stormwater calculations and ponding design, must be approved by the City Engineer prior to the approval of the PUD by the City Council. B. Verification of the approval of the Stormwater Management Plan by the Lower Minnesota Watershed District must be submitted to the City prior to the approval of the Final Development Plan for the PUD by the City Council. C. A revised landscape plan must be approved by the Planning Director prior to the approval of the PUD by the City Council. 4. The following must be completed prior to the recording of the Development Agreement with the Scott County Recorder's Office: 9 A. The applicant shall submit verification that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has approved the NPDES Stormwater Permit for the proposed Planned Unit Development prior to the recording of the Final Development Plan with the Scott County Recorder's Office. B. The applicant shall submit verification that the private sanitary sewer easements between the property owner to the west (Certain Teed, owned by Saint-Gobain Corporation) and Scherer Bros. have been completed and executed. C. The applicant shall submit verification that easements for the 8" private watermain proposed for the site have been completed and executed. The existing 1" water service line in 4th Avenue to Scherer South will be disconnected and plugged at the 12" main. D. The applicant shall submit a revised Final Development Plan which shows the location of the easement for the VIP sewer. 5. Approval of the Preliminary and Final Development Plans are contingent upon the following: A. Approval of the Final Development Plan is contingent upon the approval of the Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan and the Erosion Control Plan by the City Engineer. B. Approval of the Final Development Plan is contingent upon the resolution of the stormwater issues. 6. The following must be completed prior to the approval of a Building Permit: A. All proposed signage requires the approval of Sign Permits from the City of Shakopee, and must meet the requirements of Section 4.30, Subd. 4. B. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of Scott County Environmental Health (SCEH) regarding Hazardous Waste licenses. C. The applicant shall agree to construct a concrete reinformed slab (20' x 24' x 18" thick) beneath the railroad spur ballast to protect the existing 27" RCP CL 3 sanitary sewer. D. A total of two fire hydrants are required to serve the site, and each must flow 1,500 gallons when both are in use. The additional hydrant will be required to be located on the east side of the office building and parking lot. E. The applicant shall pay the existing special assessments against this property prior 10 to the approval of the Building Permit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Since the review of the PUD by the Planning Commission, the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the Stormwater Management Plan, calculations, and the ponding design; and the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the revised Landscape Plan. Therefore, staff is recommending that recommended Conditions 3.A and 3.0 be deleted. Condition 3.B of the Planning Commission's recommendation requires that, "Verification of the approval of the Stormwater Management Plan by the Lower Minnesota Watershed District must be submitted to the City prior to the approval of the Final Development Plan for the PUD by the City Council." As of the writing of this staff report, staff has not received this verification. Staff is also recommending that Condition No. 3.B be amended to read as follows: 3.B Verification of the approval of the Stormwater Management Plan by the Lower Minnesota Watershed District must be submitted to the City prior to the recording of the Final Development Plan for the PUD with the Scott County Recorder's Office. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4030, A Resolution Approving the Preliminary and Final Development Plans for the Scherer South Planned Unit Development, and move its adoption. {CrFYCOUN\PFPUDSCH.62I} 11 RESOLUTION NO. 4030 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE SCHERER SOUTH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD). WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee did review the Preliminary and Final Development Plans for the Planned Unit Development of Scherer South on June 9, 1994, and have recommended their approval; and WHEREAS, all notices of the public hearing have been duly sent and posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, as follows: That the Preliminary and Final Development Plan for the Planned Unit Development for Scherer South, legally described as: That part of the East half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 5, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, lying Southerly of the Southerly right-of-way of the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis, and Omaha Railroad Company as the same is now located and established over and across said Section 5, except that part thereof lying Easterly of the following described Line "A": Beginning at a point on the South line of said Northeast Quarter of Section 5, and point being 572.50 feet Westerly from the Southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of Section 5, as measured along said south line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 5; thence Northerly parallel with the East line of said Section 5 to said Southerly right-of-way line of the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis, and Omaha Railroad and there terminating; and except that part thereof lying Westerly of a line drawn parallel with and 600 feet Westerly of as measured at a right angle to said Line "A". is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The following variances from the Zoning Ordinance are approved: A. Section 11.03, Subd. 3.C, regarding Lot Provisions, which states, "Except in the case of planned developments as provided for hereinafter, not more than one principal building shall be located on a lot". The approval of this PUD allows the following buildings to be constructed on the subject site: a. Office Building. A one story office structure which includes a 2,230 square foot hardware sales area and a 1,530 square foot display area. Millwork/Warehouse. A single story structure, 64,000 square feet in area, used as a millwork warehouse. Closed Dock. Loading dock and connecting link between office and millwork / warehouse structure, 3,299 square feet in area. b. Garage. A single story, 4,800 square foot structure, used for light maintenance, washing, and parts storage. c. Warehouse. A single story structure 30,000 square feet in area, used for cold storage for roofing, siding, and related hardware. d. Covered Storage. 24,800 square feet of covered storage, open on one side only. The back of this structure will form perimeter screening and fencing for the site. e. President Homes. A warehouse, 2,400 square feet in side, and 4,800 square feet of open loading docks. To include a small office and restroom facility. B. Section 11.05, Subd. 4.B, regarding Fences, which states, "Fences in excess of the above heights shall require a Conditional Use Permit" (or approval through a PUD). The approval of this PUD allows a fence, eight (8) feet in height, to be constructed on the subject site. The fence shall be located within the areas designated on the site plans. Barbed wire fences shall not be permitted on the site. C. Section 11.33, Subd. 3.N, states that "retail sales and displays are allowed as a Conditional Use when they are necessary to a permitted principal use carried on in a structure located on the premises, but the area so used shall not exceed 15 percent of the principal structure". The PUD shall comply with the requirements of Section 11.33, Subd. 3.N. The office, dock, and millwork / warehouse building serves as the principal structure on the subject site. The applicant's submittal identifies 3,760 square feet of retail (display and hardware) area within this proposed structure. Retail operations shall be limited to Monday through Friday from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. The calculations as per Section 11.33, Subd. 3.N would be as follows: Office (First Floor / Phase I only) 11,400' sq. Closed Dock (40' x 80') 3,200' sq. Millwork / Warehouse (160' x 240') 36,600' sq. Total Area of Principal Structure 51,200' sq. 3,760' sq. Total Retail Proposed by Applicant 51,200 'sq. Total Area of Principal Structure = 7.35% of Structure 2. The following procedural actions must be taken: A. A Development Agreement stating the conditions of approval of the Planned Unit Development must be filed with the Scott County Recorder. B. A Major Subdivision plat must be approved and recorded for the subject site. 3. The following must be completed prior to the recording of the Development Agreement with the Scott County Recorder's Office: A. Verification of the approval of the Stormwater Management Plan by the Lower Minnesota Watershed District must be submitted to the City prior to the recording of the Final Development Plan for the PUD with the Scott County Recorder's Office. B. The applicant shall submit verification that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has approved the NPDES Stormwater Permit for the proposed Planned Unit Development prior to the recording of the Final Development Plan with the Scott County Recorder's Office. C. The applicant shall submit verification that the private sanitary sewer easements between the property owner to the west (Certain Teed, owned by Saint-Gobain Corporation) and Scherer Bros. have been completed and executed. D. The applicant shall submit verification that easements for the 8" private watermain proposed for the site have been completed and executed. The existing 1" water service line in 4th Avenue to Scherer South will be disconnected and plugged at the 12" main. E. The applicant shall submit a revised Final Development Plan which shows the location of the easement for the VIP sewer. 4. Approval of the Preliminary and Final Development Plans are contingent upon the following: A. Approval of the Final Development Plan is contingent upon the approval of the Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan and the Erosion Control Plan by the City Engineer. B. Approval of the Final Development Plan is contingent upon the resolution of the stormwater issues. 5. The following must be completed prior to the approval of a Building Permit: A. All proposed signage requires the approval of Sign Permits from the City of Shakopee, and must meet the requirements of Section 4.30, Subd. 4. B. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of Scott County Environmental Health (SCEH) regarding Hazardous Waste licenses. C. The applicant shall agree to construct a concrete reinformed slab (20' x 24' x 18" thick) beneath the railroad spur ballast to protect the existing 27" RCP CL 3 sanitary sewer. D. A total of two fire hydrants are required to serve the site, and each must flow 1,500 gallons when both are in use. The additional hydrant will be required to be located on the east side of the office building and parking lot. E. The applicant shall pay the existing special assessments against this property prior to the approval of the Building Permit. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Development Agreement for the Final Development Plan for the Planned Unit Development. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney EXI-LIBIT A • 1 - • . • ► •,--.- , , , .din--- . -- - - r s...ti 1.1 --�_—� — --L __ _ __ = i,:i .n•, :Sit ,fir. ..... -.....,..-.1-= \ :iiM.i.i.ii'::q.i'M N :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: • SUBJECT SITE > = '' i 11v_ i AG AGRICULTURE F 1 1 R1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL g 1 i R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL _ _ :'-: I. R3 MID-DENSITY RES. g I I R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. ' I ! B1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS E , i B2 COMMUNITY BUSINESS i ! B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS c E 1 I1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL i I 12 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL 1I ; j S SHORELAND I '' TD 1 FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT 1 -�-.. MANDATORY PUD ca.-Ezatzr RTD RACETRACK DISTRICT , Zoning Map City of SHAKOPEE EXHIBIT B OLSON Quality Commercial & Industrial Construction for 80 years CO. :010 HILLSBORO A\ ENL•E NORTH MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55428 61: 535.1481 Apr'__ ii, 1994 City of Shakopee 129 Holmes St . S . Shakopee, .MN 55379 Re : Proposed Scherer Bros . Facility East 4th Avenue Gentlemen: The proposed 22 . 6 acre site is located south of Highway 101, north of East 4th Avenue and west of the existing Cercainteed property. This parcel plus the undeveloped land to the west, is presently owned by Thunderhawk, N.V. and under purchase agreement to Scherer Brothers Lumber Company. The parcel is zoned I-2 and the intended use is a full-service building materials supply facility. This use conforms to permitted uses under I-1 and I-2 zoning. The development will consist of seven buildings, some of which are linked or connected together. Including future expansion, these buildings are: 1) Office: - two story, approximately 26' in height - 16, 000 S .F. per floor - 2 , 000 S .F. hardware sales area - 2, 000 S . F. display area - private and open area offices - related restrooms, lunchroom, etc . - architectural masonry exterior - steel bar joist roof with single ply membrane roofing - passenger elevator 2) Millwork/ Warehouse: - single story, 26' in height - 64, 000 S . F. - architectural precast concrete exterior walls - steel bar joist roof with single ply membrane roofing - employee facilities : lunchroom, toilets, etc . - yard office - pre-hung door shop - warehouse millwork - loadin= docks and grade 3) Closed Dock: - connecting link and loading dock - same construction as millwork/ware'rous= - 3 , 299 S . F . 4) Garage : - 4 , 800 S . F. sin= e story, 20 ' in height - architectural precast concrete walls - steel frame and bar foist roof with single membrane roof r - light maintenance - washinc - parts storage 5) Warehouse : - 33, 000 S . F. single story, 26' in height - architectural crecast concrete walls - steel frame and bar joist roof - single ply merr:crane roofing - cold storage for roofing, siding and related hardware 6) Covered Storage : - 24 , 800 S . F. , approximately 20 ' in height - architectural precast concrete walls - steel frame and bar joist roof - standing seam metal roofing - open on one side - backside forms part of the perimeter screening and fencing 7) President Homes : - 4, 800 S . F. of open loading dock - 2, 400 S .F. of covered warehouse - small office and toilet - precast concrete or architectural CMU exterior walls - steel frame and bar joist roof - single ply membrane roofing - loading of pre-packaged homes The site will be tastefully landscaped, irrigated, and well maintained. Most of the area within the fence will be paved and possible some gravel surface in lumber storage areas . A railroad spur will extend into the property from the north providing the bulk of the materials stored on site . Historically, Scherer Bros . Lumber clientele is 85% professional builders and remodelers and l5% consumers . Approximately 80% of the materials leaving the site will be on Scherer Bros . Lumber trucks which are well maintained and regularly washed. The traffic count is estimated at : 3-40 employees - _ :rip ter da•_: 30 - 40 company trucks - 3 trips per _ay 24 - 24 3-4 incoming semi _rucks - 1 t_-:p/day 3 - 4 20-30 costumers - _ trip per day 30 - 40 Total per Day: 75 - 100 The first phase includes all cf the above building but some would be smaller. The owner would like tc obtain a grading/drainage permit in June and proceed with construction as soon as possible . The site is to be fully operational by Spring of 1995 . Two signs will be requested - one on :he north end identifying the location from 101 and one on the 4th A:•enue end at the customer entrance . These signs would be of the permanent type, not changeable or computerized. Trash containers will be within the fenced area and screened from public view. Fencing around the yard should be cyclone type, 7' high, plus barbed wire, totaling 8' . This would match the neighbor to the east and provide the needed security for a building materials supplier. The required parking is more than adequate for the estimated 30-40 employees and the expected 20-30 customers . The use of flexible split time starting and ending hours will minimize the traffic impact . The business is open during normal business hours five days per week and currently there are no plans for weekend hours . Sincere • , 7:,1 Air •obert S . Olson President OLSON COMPANY RSO:kn EXHIBIT C TO: Terrie Sandbech (Assistant City Planner) Dave Hutton (Public Works Director) FROM: Mark Hanson. Bonestroo, Rosene. Anderlik & Assoc. (636-4600) DATE: May 13. 1994 RE: Scherer South - PUD City Staff Report Update Response to Items 8. 13-19 Terrie Sandbech letter. dated May 12. 1994 8) • Parking Calculations: Ultimate Office 25,000 S.F: 1 Space/200 S.F. 175 spaces Dock. Millwork, Warehouse, Garage Covered storage, Presidential Home/Dock 139,800 S.F.: 1st 24,000 S.F. = 8 spaces Remaining 115,800 S.F. 1 Space/6,000 S.F. 27.3 spaces TOTAL 203 spaces • Parking Calculations: 1st Phase Office 21,000 S.F.: 1 space/200 S.F 105 spaces Dock, Millwork, Warehouse, Garage Covered Storage Presidential Home/Dock 95,000 S.F.: 1st 24.000 S.F. - 8 spaces Remaining 71,000 S.F. 1 Space/6,000 S.F. 19.8 spaces TOTAL 124 spaces • Employee Parking shown on Master Plan (Sheet 2). Customer parking is all remaining parking. 13) Scherer Bros. has submitted a letter petition to Dave Hutton. Public Works Director, to review storm water conveyance and ponding in this area (to be ordered at May 17, 1994, Council Meeting). Items C through F discussed in attached May 3, 1994. correspondence. 14) Scherer Bros. plan has been submitted to the Lower Minnesota Watershed District and was approved at their May 11 Meeting. 2251).c r 15) MPCA Construction Activity Permit will be submitted in accordance with the MPCA (#MNR 100000) and the owner will comply with the requirements during construction. 16) The owner will submit the S75.00 application fee. 17) Private sanitary sewer easements between the property owner to the west and Scherer Bros. have been completed and will be executed. Legal descriptions and drawing included with Preliminary Plat submittal. 18) The utility plan for water main has been revised to provide 8" private water main in site. Backflow preventor and water meter will be located in garage. Existing 1"water service in 4th Avenue to Scherer South will be disconnected and plugged at 12" main (see Sheet 3). 19) A concrete reinforced slab (20' x 24' x 18" thick) will be constructed beneath railroad spur ballast to protect existing 27" RCP CL 3 sanitary sewer (see sheet 3). Calculations verifying design are provided. 22505.00r EXHIBIT D OLSON Quality Commercial & Industrial Construction for 80 years CO. 5010 HILLSBORO AVENUE NORTH • MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55428 • 612/535.1481 May 16, 1994 Ms. Terrie A. Sandbeck Assistant City Planner CITY OF SHAKOPEE 129 Holmes St. S. Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Final P.C.D. - Scherer South - Addition or Revised Items from Preliminary Dear Ms. Sandbeck: Consideration No. 3 To better understand Scherer's "retail sales and displays", Mike Scherer gave us the following clarification: . Customer base is 93% professional builders and remodelers. . Advertising is limited to institutions and done primarily in builder magazines. . Hours of operation are Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. . We offer free delivery to all customers discouraging customer pickup, although it is allowed. . At current locations, less than 5% of sales are cash sales. . Our product inventory mix is limited to products builders will buy from us. . We do not stock or sell consumer oriented products such as lawn and garden, lighting, paint and wallpaper, etc. . Hardware sales floor is classified as builders hardware and serves as both display and warehouse for many products. Many products we deliver come off the hardware sales floor, not a separate warehouse. . We do not sell individuals and consumers within our terms, hours, and guidelines. . We do not run sales or advertise sales for the general public. . We do not try to directly complete with local full service hardware stores, paint and wallpaper stores, lawn and garden stores, etc. . Our hardware space will fall within the guidelines of the percentage allowed con- cerning only the office square footage. . Our display floor/showroom should not be considered as retail space. It is used by vendors to display new products and as a hands on learning center for employees, builders, and home buyers. A new home is the single largest purchase people make. Our display floor answers and demonstrates technical questions and allows comparisons to be made as well as allowing for style and color choices. It fulfills the old adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words". . We are confident that we can not only fit the letter of the law for industrial zoning but the spirit of the law as well. It should also be pointed out that the office is actually part of a larger building complex which includes a connecting link/loading dock area labeled "covered dock" on the plans, and the millwork area which is labeled "millwork/warehouse" on the plans. These three areas were listed as separate buildings to show the individual functions but they are one building. The hardware is shipped and received at the connecting loading dock, warehoused in the millwork area, and displayed in the office area. As per page A3 of the building plan, the hardware sales/display area total 3,760 S.F. which amounts to 6.75% of the total building area of 55,701 S.F. We are asking for approval of an 8' high fence under the P.U.D. for the following reasons: . Security - building materials stored outside can be an attractive item for unwanted visitors . Safety - kids climbing around in lumber piles can be dangerous . Conformance - same design as Certainteed's fence to the east Page five of the Purchase Agreement with Thunderhawk. N.V. is also enclosed to verify the commitment of the owner of the property to the west to provide private sewer easements. The balance of the items are covered in the attached letter from Mark Hanson of Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates. We are submitting documents for preliminary plat approval at this time also. Our construction schedule is very tight and we would appreciate avoiding another month in the approval process. The final P.U.D. and preliminary plat application sheets submitted are not signed by the present owner. We will be forwarding a signed copy within the next couple of days. Enclosed also is a faxed approval of the storm water drainage by Certainteed. A formal agreement will be finalized and a copy submitted to the City as soon as possible. Please call if there are any additional concerns or if we are missing anything. Sincerel Robert S. Olson President OLSON COMPANY Enclosures RSO:kn • Ioo. OW'NIW,t!\GtitL\C(r\] SOW "•a MI,M 1Y.00:5,I Xbgrl'NAM b011II1V• .I..IM,. LW aui"..1* IS 19V11. 1'4 NN^MNI1•IIH'N i0l91oOBBt1ku I ""' ° +' 9 )1114a'uv dVW �IHdVi 0d01 JNLLSIX3 r ,Xn Q08b630 VIM... Lvls w A WI MIM, auaaoj II" H1flOS N3N3H3S v1 "" 0001 °°" ter MOM ON S.:,q„ m .!» •,�.....•Mtel,� 0021sou0e 00 N38W(1-1 S2�3H1O I8 2132�3HOS !•— L. .46N11.1 Wu AlVMK (iR/MbM SW XI,d Sou Mu MUMn AMI.I I _ b LI' ! 1 . 1 R. R P. • J :: / 0 1 1 ' J w 3 O . iF c sejo.2.2:y F. 4 MG /fi t,71;i ±rr o —ter—Z 8 .s ` 1 it, Z CV • g I\ U 1 lel \ 1 C.) Ne ,• •llU H t .IL:.:....;,...1 • e l t ✓1 �._ , ._•___- °, /I.....• , /j . !.. A_•, _'" ,. _, • -..,r�.= - ~..w .. ' , \ ;. rte •'F.,. :\. 1. a / <• .. / EF.A' i \ A' ri 'o• I ii//%!fes\\ . II j fi `r 1 ..t `•'s'i• ±i _ .:1 i�}I ~�` .y! i i! 1 i / f "l I' ! !i pri`, F \.: :" I.t:. `= -:1.11 d..t '?'. $ ( • J I i j! f % r` \ �'.iy._:...8 ', / 117 '► .f j ri Faxi ....: m a :!` 'I f'�\ ' 1 t 1 i • l i j it !+ L 4i L.J r. A•I :�.a„.p.. +l+l ' Q j/'.�' I., ' C{ ! ( f f D •j j 1 ( !.S f / �`'}/f i1 1/.1 1 •..1A:\ s l.:-• ..;r• :t!..?.7 . 1'111• a':CS p•1 f it s j ' . i , t 1 ! 11 t 1 1 1 i S i j• & 1,11 • 1"7 /1 I t ,''''' —.:..... rf / ..�I + ' j J f s ;•.`Vl '-fi `r i a.. 1 ► ) l irtt ti � lri - !f \ 3 1.d� .I j if, fry /J /• i 1 1 .eri I' r fl`�„ fl' f J tr ;i' ,.-4.. \:1 ,. !...• n i /.'., f i, ,„ ,. ,,.......-:-.::;„/ / f 1.I, i =p 'It v `';1_,../, i / 02 u is-4 \..._- ._, ' • r \4\ J 1 r L u' �l r•, /f' I' if r. \w 2,, I,./,,v ,,,/` ~ f1 rA ,.` \,- `•l\1 `\ ``. . , 1 .4:, i( ; X11 1 Ci '\ r 'fir'4!''�' ' I ► ) AO t I/`. �1 �} il r. 4 I. ,i ll_I 11 ' r ! f ,I I i•ji v f lE • �';'(� / is _^`_; �_,: =-_jam` e... -r ! 1� sc>=- / A........J;®= =cam_ .-� .. Xy' "a ,,.. z a N S a o AL1 �, ! Q �' 1'- .�.1 - • 0 t1 \ R t{ F -77-17-7' (— FOURTH_AV_ENUE__ - 30'30• SETBACK. FRONT YARD----1--- —.---1,--"------ ,r___ _ i 1� I (POND-} --• v_r i �� ' j ' r —��- — — ---- — 4Z",_.f0'i — — — — --1 t W I v 1 7 I I o I J ! ,'' 19'SPoteei 1 i 't, j 9 T--''I / Vii 3 l : 1 II. ib' o i Wo -4 I _'[: I I t ii i 19l$ppeee i 1 LOl iQ 1 Sp.i j 14118 18114 .--` it _ I • 0. J - N 1 i 'D1 1 1 !111§' :g _•: §-.;,'21; ...._l ,. I i2 $do- - j .:.! ,lS pocei 1 N i .::: I i ni ,I CO 1. �'o L� i ___� � 1 c°_f -._. _._ i -W �' !TIT-.a�_ iiia Al - -. p a, j � i -s�'m 1 L-. ' 1ces ?o g 0 8,g 9'a ^.I I o ., to ' r j `L' ` `w[ n !1e�84 \ IIS . _3. -�� I -W a 4 1 'o L "s i .4i•g Ion n t 2R 30O c.7' tl i 5 N m ,:03. 1 i .'a 0,..o i a ' el r ' i 1 7E- 1 iw 1 co c I I ' m ggN r2,1 agF Fps ! o '° { c'C I::6,51:2A � "O H� � o i0� m aW � ''o ' W a jgI c° g s I o9 S i 8to m 6 W if g � g I ji i fI ' I 01,0 j � '1W* i X)4m Hiz i t I • 0 i u; 1 O 1 • tn . . . [ �c 1 11 • 0 0 v ; ' 4 I 1 0- I o i 7 Pi 1 a Po 1 I i W� i 0- ' CI ^.1 I i! P ji m I` 1 3 91 I t rl 1 v I i >r '• 0O I coif m iu 1 I C. N t • ii i 3 d 1 x I a I „, I > 1II • !J i v ' i f i i '1 1 i t I' r ! I , s • N 1 II 1 • r 11 '4 i CD SIm 1 4 0 � � I Ail t A P- I _ _ p of • i r' I GO ` ( 0O • r o Z o. C � N `............................................ i $ �' -----,,z •-•,........_-.. - — 0, .o G LRO,gp'--. Inn! il--.1....:":----_ . _. I I.., N z, SCHERER BROTHERS LUMBER Co. Boneetroo '""'.'""['"'•`"',"'°KAOCD SURVEY WI ��« o.rt t['oe)•••M a A.oNi•Cte w'K c uo[•yr or Avtlms�d..o nw' our am' o••or[zvo'•[[wn[t'[ or•K tow A+KO.Pirr... WI. • SCHERER SOUTH Roeene VO[N OK u•s d MC SIMI Cr W[W'A LI•Andertlk it [f OK0 •w' '•5CMOT 1•'1'00 .v':i.' '�n MASTER PLAN •a+oKo We, IO• Associates .i,�•J,m.o. art ••M�'1+[ ,ca q 11)•o OAK WK.•. •ex+Om.AMC.C.MIM'•MOON;C.II' Co.. zoos .\)h\)rbf\) OSCIILOK b Jo ....•..w.rr,..;:.‘.::\-. w.0 '.w> •..t-n.1•.000.•ru...•.•n, 1,.,srr•I .✓•./c 00000 elm ....a.n ywai„ bu b.111,•''''''-'',3'.••. ".,,,, ISA M4•.•MI1•MJ lY 7./..,.. S.0,111•+...v•>vuroi 019. 010,099, Y919100aBti:/U NVId A1f1UJ1/3L$ .rl. .•4,w,.0 10.0,T.1; 9 �IIIJoPuy 3NO 3Sbad ✓✓. o.•46/1/0 YL>• am rgts•w o urts w,o ss..m.rt ouuooy Hlf10S I3213HOS r•ws .n..rl r•css,ar..s.s'c,• m r wr 1 ,� .,.. ,Wt, �wo Pol. L.11100 tom u'M:yam •N„U,.....w OOJIo0008 '00 213811(11 S2l3H10218 213213HOS 1 r� - ,_ •c 0000.. ..- _ COI i _ z 7 -0000.. \ _e 00-00_ -_-::_ - a o w i 1 , , 1 1 1 m 1 11 �1�- r N Z U vt W I w • -•:., O `•• t.: Z 2 5- 1 h . S ,13 1 \ S 1 1'" Q a O 3 r -�_{- , ` W- - --- --_-,•:) = F- O J <I 7,_. - - _ (.- -J1- L _. • -- --- -- r 7 L a R WI I nU \ 00 ,'i \ 1�-000000 W I ( t,ir Ypi WI W >733]37, 3 r _ u I ( ,-. 1 O c""wuuuus U Z I 1N �1 •4, i ,U' In III ^ L3' N a I Upg 6 g cc a I o 11 III m 'a' aJ Nm b3 Y I u 1 0, • u l _»`_ �° In t> I 0 �1 -y:. i. i.`• hit'''. •,i F ,. z0 ( i I I I < f �cl 3r`; flab s1 [E., I 11 ; �F 11 t� ` I� IISK I4� { 0+� g I X•to • do• .,T.-. 2d, I. I u t !� . f. - Ia b 1.9 ( Iv ^ o o gm ! 1 '• Ti � , '` , F II { ' - i4 ry 'i i ars 9 a i 4oc I 2' l fid.._ x NE it 1{{ `� ILII{ IV N 3 �� �I `I �, O �' I�� 1.2 1/43 CY 4 F ,1 W tot Z 1 ( a I 1 00 ., o..4 £ 0 11 oA^ I { e8' t)-r. 0 1 I r ...el I c mI 2 tt \ // .1 a. O • ( ypt yyyp111 yyyp��1�/p1 yyyp111 a yyyp��1 ••:'•:.L•pp wp Y u u I - := 7 0. b LL Oh�DO NC.o 040 NNN I ' W -U V> m 5 7 In GGGONnnv OOcoryrm I d I 8a�b : g na F 1 n� i I t a1 { IS YS S I' { y 8rc `•O d0 Cli l o tax V_ LI_ - - _l m y F-U 1 rl o i'it r 1 ' --.">9---r-_--{ O yl 3Nd .i1 b N n IAV " o 3o ,I -� O W FIT I V o v §‹ '••G •�4�nj�0.r pp d' O' m 0 0^ L , WW-yy0980 t, Z� ,. 184 b� 1 #. ; ? 1 l' = 0u 11q'ika. 530.0 1oso0 NLn ` O ` Our 3 0 m'nu rcnA I N U 1 o n S Zrs o'O 4 0 I 1I 1 14^rt - Eto 0000 -11'3;7' \ a -...._..._...___......»0000_.__ - aI . N I 14 b � I i 11. I .1. •I N P. g m j 1 IJ -. U 2. I I .7 W { ,. KK p WO 0 3 1. , I a o I I U { U _ o'� ON m 2. x 1 % s Cj 010.1 0 1 ato,tel !`1.j 0 El 1\ m '4'. ' b i I ry be 8 � g d .pry 1 I , w 11.I '� c' $\111 • 0000 • dl•'p ` n O n i m° m v _� . p es. IW{ 43 . 3 . r 1 �^ b I 1. k itsr - ;u0 o I a'v = 7 Vac w $ I. 6 1 .,:� .:a o c = m V > o t m$u F ,� Mme F b I w a�m m is p 0 ���-- 4 (KU� - . «< m �, m Y .� U p- \• ,� W 1 ;e1 U m8 .S •1-•1 L^ s I ^r Z > a I:Su` i o Yb 1 U UKZ • I tf� \1 �i-U A �rU ..'7".4 w 4o O -.1.Y • b g � 1 b�} y ^h4= < v IT �l b Y ... Ft!, iz 1._� 1 1. 1p U I..UO `YII..�L'S i. A\ ( Ug LL 1 1 t � Via 1.92 iCo:,;;i 11 0000. 1 1 g -a Naw �; t l I ._ t jl {1 1 i y b .d I 0000...._ m o . Ill b Zo I 'll $YI ''I1 Q- 1'.1.1111 1111 1 i 0000.0000 0000 0000_.0000 ' Y` I�I� i i. 1:+r. i i 1 Liw� 1 i i I `4 i I I�_.. I. . I i ;> :LYS IO m .4171U1I, •I �� �., . �i1�il ; X11 �i� • o , , i ,� I R9l�R 3 Ito<a i- - -` q�75 ^9 - I c m 1 Igtv� WWII Il;iil{1;I !�0. !l 1 .R 1 = c b '�� % � xI Cl w I I IT - •t-0. N .5311. Z-.OLI ,Z s= ��1 C-,------4.-16----•-,• Fli�•-. NM,-IH1.M-:d-- >-• ;•••••••-...-Y T'r•' ,•--n- r.�.r�>'"!- '...7F .".2_17.7-"T"--'T• _.-7. •7-. = _0000. /77: ".......�.a_. -.41.---7-77. , �_ '- 3f1N3AV HT(103 . - • • , FOURTH AVENUE ..b, ,:ti• .-......-.. ' ..----......•••••,...v.,..F-7-.. .--r .......---?•-,...-.'"7". ,^7-47-71-7-7-Irf,71..7-77,r,.• ...‘;:!„..,...... --.- :--------7:7-.777. 7:-1"7---:.•.:: . 7,/,,x,./r...44.Z..4.• •" ,,- __, _.",__...,„_..„,...---e!---“- ... ..... -A,......_.... 4..• ...... ..... ••7•.•-•* .-.•-•?.--__!••_•:.7.-.r.C.7z"...,___.4...-. ''•-..e*. -.1.-,..ttv-- ..••••,•-' -.1."--...A7IE,":'•'--- -- .....7.---.17_,---•,. :=1: :TIT- '.. . 14 - ' •-,•4=-1t.t r .' _..-• , , --Pkg.nl- -- ,- i .Ir • ...• - ;... -....•-•?:,,.. . ) ,.1.-,.• ,•/-1A ,.t,, --- 7 -...," - - u I• ,- la., t..../. m f• 1 %4..• •••••V, 1.• . I? .: il -I • : • . i ; I . IT71111401111171 I ;11E1 I • '"e" •t .... 1 ...' . '7,40---1-•• :r.f---- „„„,----I ,4./t , a ; • •44 .1 .4 / • 4t . . •:.: : T- ! / i 1-1141 oi.....,.4:1 I Hi i liM'I'; 111 • • • ; .. . --1„ ,D , , _..• - s----• .-- 1 1.-, , ,-4L.. .,;%__....._.. __. . . _.__, / •• • - 7.•,/ • , i .„.. ' " . xr wow IVOR : it.ttttIO -... 11111 ......m... JoiNfia '". ' .::.. '.- ,;',1•1 I P ti I I I '.: 1 . . . . • .:.(1 .. _ 14..i............. NM , r t-,,, ,• 4„.. :, , i . • 4 I A /-•t ;• .. _.....• ...-.. ‘ . i R . i .. .1,:, \ .... k,,,,,,,, 2 A ., , .0 . •• . •. 1 b . ik41 , I 11.• ..7'i • • . i ,,i.;.:7.. 1 ... ..., .... i ../d I 1 t• ,.•41 .vLi \ ,..1,' * ? ...,•,. 1111 g -,) j/ 1/' ' - --- 11 )..•••••-* 7. I/ 1 .• ....t./ g I • : . F. 7 ....-1 ; • c- if tm 311 1:t i i4 1 2-1\ -1; /....7rsT :;;;ICA - 72'1. - / ?*,Ii. , ...... ( (ti.....1 )4( • '.i .e. tit 1, ;.e__,, un•AA. . '. •s, r , tit .II i \?„,,, Id ti. ;11'1;.:••'••• . ,R., ..,,,,k, ...., ; so, .1 ..,- i r tr 1-a ' i \ ' C‘' i •1 1.1. ....111 rt c Fl 15 2. \k„.. 4. --- ........-.- .. ......e > . di A . .0* 1 \ F1,..: '' t r I/ r .... a li r# od A a• 21ln% • 4 0 t. I I \ t... ,": 3 4 Ciq PS t‘.• - 1:11‘ 47.. ...... 14.1 \ , •--- , 2 .NC . , - -.. ........, i% •••••,„ I • ‘ . 9. .',. \ I ‘, 1 t . 1 pir: • i„....- •,.. ÷ vr- ...,,,il I 't ? (1 '--„1,-tk, .R1••, s ..,. ! is ; i I:I I--.Pp %..c.- II I [tit 1Th ; i , 5,na S • . -, k . it 111 ---....„ . i iiir ...'" -- -.--rP.-- •-•.,., ) 01,1 i ..... .7 ........--.0 .4 • , , ...,..1_,.. .7 A ; ; : • 6-, ......_-:..... ,,,....„ • 1 \ \ . --...„. . • . , . . VI - .:: -..., --.. ., ."..., ,,,, • . 4.-,7,(5'..-NA,•-• •• •••••._ I:*: 1 I"ra FT•/ 1.----,... ''3, -- "- "-...,.'"-- ;s, ss.„ \-, --....„, ,...., 1 , • ".; •" . 11gIg V / ! \ \ \ • '-'44::,--------. '-....._""-• -,... s. , s.„ N ••.. 1 ,.. ss. ii -\i• : . .... -..,.... I 1:".. '1 - ! ‘ .1 ‘ --4-- Is a j.---....,'"-•".•'''' C ' , -*--",`%, ---I\ \ ' 1 \ ,. 1. ; k 1, ... ...„.....„ -...-4....:..,:s. tl iEUFFFilF4P \ .1\ 1\ 1 4"z 0 +--) ..".:. ., ---.'s:.` Z:`°` C-7-'s--..„,----...:•-• •-.,:-.. ••••••;"--., '1/4:4. ..N:It , \ '...."...`1/4"."--- ----.." V"-- ' '..' -.•••>---... -1/4 :ielq6 c X d i\ \ 1 1•\ ‘ ‘ -.., ".,,-...-:..„--.....„ ..,...>._. --....z.---„:-.„-• : • • \ 1, VI ti, 2-11y.i . i . , 1 .1 21' ,--ru \„.... 1. --..... ....-.....„J ....„,.:„ -q;„Q2r.oIgi : 1 \ \ •,\Il 14 ._...............„ ........ 5 %2.5i$,,r2. ! i . ‘ .z ‘ • „I ,t St ,4(...- `..„ --,-••• .i. 71!. , ‘,. .., •, s.,„ .1,, k 5 , ,•••,, . \ ..., -.3.,g ., .1::::.-.7:--...----::::› Z s , ".,; .. • s... ,., 1 \ 11 \ \ is, \ s..- ..-•.. ..... , 1 1 ,.\ 1 0: , ..... IV.. i,1 ,..‘., s......... .............."-".--- ..............-^".""-' , \../ .: \ s 1 .• p . 7 tR N: ngA Ass,, \ s-,°4----"---...,...----------.1...-----. ---------, -......_...... I 4 i -4-Rfil° i \ ---•---_____-1.1.4,..,...,,,...., , 01 ------.....____ I bRel-^, t- I r-, ,- itast__ --........a.z:..... ......._. i i.,19 . 4 ..'...-N \ "I rn, ! liAl i ) 14 ) P ....."-,. . Ii I ,1 . ts.4j -^.------ ---N_Ii-'-".....'-'... . .' '\ %..........\ \ 45 t • \ ., Ft DI tl> I \1 4: ..• s., • .. • ,Ago . ' ‘,....4, %I ,. \ , •4.g -lc-7--• .." .---- -.-.7'.-- s'AWZ. . V. , •••-„,. \-I ii,--,..„._ • 1.1 -.... -- _3 -.., , st,-• i ........T , ., . . ... ,. -,,,,s • .. s...„.„. ,, ... ,I). afri 1 . ..,?,,,.._::.•-•,.,..0..i.) _.1..... tic, .-2-, ta ' ‘... . • . %‘ t . .?,',fg"--i .. ..\\.2 - "-.., •I 1 ....... x 1.-... cdp .. .. . , 3 - - \7_,..._ , ,•.e ,...----....1 (.1' ., ,,„••• .- ; . I 11 '1 l'..- • .',.; / 9 0 ; of\ <4 ,-1- e. At,: •.,. ..----- - s, . 4. • , -- 1 I .1. • ,...i. l',....' .., • 1 "....., rt. 1 r ' .................„..," --'N, A 1. '',,, . .I4. it XV)) '' I • .-1-. ------ -0-7) I )1 • ...0 _....... ,„ .- I ,, ._..-- • . in I.) \44 ..... ,, ‘Vitcavanwar0riguONAT.15.7 \ f ii k \ ! I )1*CCD4Im N. c •‘ r" ..; ;If-, 't. ss'ss-,. ‘‘"-... , : .. ,. ,.,) IN E c 1 . m 1 \ s-,,...___ ___••44-4.. , :.....----..,____._. -=. ...... ...... _.1 _,....,.. _..........,A. 0 --0- .\\T.F.I. .- .- A F I 0 0 .74-7:..- e 3 ..\-'/ _,...) s' l i `... ....____,,. i .Z, ..t.' \ . .r--... .51 %-.... • \ I ti r- • ......_,, N\ ,---. .•.....c__ A 40/ .1--- -....... --a....„.:‘--4%-..........---- • •r•------... i a ."-'":".---"----.... ) • c r i 1 Ildil 2 Z ° '4411. ----7:41, •'1/44 ---- .. E:6'f i 0 ...,:-..,.., ...c. 2 &CfrEas:z'----t':----'1:41,..,....:2Z;.•„..-7:1•• .--...7...........--,„:„:i...,-----;.......„j..t........ ..''":„...„..:„.. ........•.............„:„„i:1„-1.:,,_,.,..:.,...................... -:•-•:::: 1' co) cr. ffil ..c, . . . .99.P.L. 0. A .7.0...1. 1 EN 1 .til ....,. .4. SCHERER BROTHERS LUMBER Co. 0 Bonestroc. a ArchiNci• via SCHERER SOUTH PHASE ONE LAN Posene A 4 C09frodort ilriont=1A:4"0" I AY A LW ftwer0K0 MAYASSOVA 001CAKLA DV. ~I NC VAS CA 10C 101C SIAM OT 1.1041SMA ANSO• ft0 entow Anderlik .c.Gr601050.01 gl 04n.1 ." OM Anne aloof. AAArm n m.o. row,MIA A W GRADING/EROSION CONTROL PAssociate/. A 1•0011 tA11101•11 I v.1;,-; el.Pi 1.1• .0•9 C., ' " Kt NO. "2." .,...c .. "" •ny.tom Anww."AR A A100•1111A,sr.1061 row., ArdN •\IM 5,0•11\A 00,,,00•An: •••• . .• • U DA)MA.tLLKALLNLL\'a %OWL 'a.al', MI 70.%a.x.w•.wu.-N6.U.t.. 00 00.., „„, a[ii� as by'''..-71„461.-.7—L.o .•16"un.I'•.118 C019130991( NY1d 0NI1H011/3dr3SONY1 01..'.. 4 )III)op0V N 3N0 3SVHd ^'.� '"["" °"°6'0 vro,s.■1,.mu sa m s«,wan. OuoYoa H1f10$ 21383H OS k— .uII/i Yr•.I.nlm. 111110 Iona raw'av1.u'�6.w.*Duo nnro)N..Iii •wuwnl14 ..11112 OAJl9G{[De till '00 213811th S2:13 H102:18 213H3HOS `ito L.6 ...Alm VIM 4341'6 Omo.f.w iv%.IV4 La M.MIM,)•6110.I II_:I. /` . �1111`il 0 'S W v G M` _; N n . ii LI o ,I,ig ,--. z ) .:,-.:. i ....... ...... , ........Z..... 67 I ;71 •.� f ;(J • O GI N 1 00 C.1 \\ e X \ -� .—., c N I \\\ t 1 & O. d O. u• U; . • .1 Y • 1 \\ n a O 1 \� -.° i. U FA IN 1.0 0'+:`.. ,-.7------ -"�_ 00 0. �� 11 \• N d W 11 • ` _ = ,r 1,;0 I 1 a .�� I i� III S '/ §d� i ,0 1 7 i _ i . __._ X11 i $�A ail 1 - I 1 :t1 c o�Z I I .v u II r_w , ` ' I I Wl.4 �' iii 1_ ,c-1 mt z 1 1t)G ; II Nlt� I. Grp . i � �.,i I ,I— II •\ 1 �Y 1.b D• Ir; 1 z 0 ?g ,IF W>O y.= L I 1 ��N 12- � SfSU VC ©. l'—' 01 \ t 1 . L5ti Fw 1 T:7 •'1. w r.'r.. I , C I I y 1 I og L.:0i 1.4 o 1IJ I • j-.1 A-Af AS i< Z H1 ; t... 41 ' 1 _... �. vi : .�' , {{{{4 .. i --..___ ... _.._.__.._ . ...._____._........_._._._......... ......_._. 0000. I 1 I _ 1 b _ SI- W�.� .E W I �.._i 1 • u q .l 5-t V } 1 i I IL D I z1 1 1 1 C r - 1 i C3 I 0 0_0.0. . • 0 00 0.._ .. o cm °•8;:', 3 1 ' 1 1 N I ti., In xw� ir (r U u '7.1 1� F 4: w ;YI i r 1 c.):14 `_��..I' U d n 14.1 1 ;i " r3 W <m n ti; j ; a i l ► =j ..(N: r.: ll+h1? ...` IL. �,� _._�__.______.._..._ _.... _._ um ,ill u ,) —_.. ..._.._..._ 1 V V N K O O I i : \ 1 ••. • j Um sii--t.....----\\„g— I '& dFV0I -,:i...,o c1 .1 A .. \•.., [ V } ] . W �X V7� by JEn z 1 O( 3 N YNUI axrJt 2 t • Q O 1 yUo2 2 Uy023OOy,ZxZI a i m / %i." < 41 aisagi opeel, •• • )1 ,-_- li ' I ••. I 1 '1 r II i n.. 1 'U U: i, ■ tiINNNNN NIMCWIIIMM x�' mat 12 !�•� l .1an..1iii i`� 1111 illl: iilllill � I.,. 4..W.d = -1= .. z 1emL►•— _Y J6 1 i (I' '! III i i i i •••I ��— --- ! ;. I /1� :0. Ib' • l li i lila�F •> 4 .. \ / , I 'Sit,4 444: 1!li<� <! I11[111i'�i 11111 i • L[ i 1• •• , 1 I.ni�� rc lirariP Lr 3f1N3AV H12ll03 "',W 3AV Hitt X000 fn co , a -1 -,, , cP-CL1) ..... ....., ,. . R 11 1110 IIIl1IIlILJL 11IIUIII C7 • � • n guy . aper " M 'wM1rwMM!! lwwM'nMM� Cz II -•t g 1 m ^/ g 6 �' L v 7-d i -, pi I I I ' r I r i4 _ n w y Lii°1321. I ��• 1 TiI II: 1 s 23P I 1 I �f; / m. 7',--'� S3of1 li 1liit r and 1 — 1 cn I 4NI ; I m I ;: m>= 19e}e} 1, i 0 m .'U N ..-- IEli i I 3- zc • ,. co: 3 . V •o g 1 +I" i'- . I r 1 z III i iii 1 1 fsz illi ail II. 1 1 ON -2 • • I i HimIli §. 8I .c 1. 11111 I 16 : 0 (11 I a > m = w C j o i o y m m . a r p p z N IRO � I 1 Q HIGHWAY o' sct1ERER,alt-trams 1-VMDEEK CO. „-.. _ SC.EiFEtH�.��YJfH I 1 F411 . Z Q; Lqa WYZ f(. = cr 111 i dO3 12ao • er ! til U r: ? JoCU ; WI ilii: d is/: J F � ai3. IW ra 3. .' , • • • Wb g" rn C 1 i I I I ---- 1 I S Y I I I i I I---- n g I iw Io 1 — _ " aw — 6,J M od — I •s I 1 W . cj T1 I &I Itr-Air'l UU 1 ti 5 . i . .._.___(._.___. ..______._. .___... Ft--- u� au "L2 Is 1 LL Q I o N I 1 aN m 6m 1 I o- E',-f I I I— 1 .a.r� I .a.zc --I © © V It; 15-. ! ! IIillI (7:-.) J PI O ` • y_) � �;"g1 m _ " . —J_�...._LJ_ LI L —1 1 —1....A L...1 . J—.r1_— __ --UNT 7 7Nm C— .'.C r9 NZ — OSn as C _.—.—.—.—.—. • Z + L 1 I 11 1J ,Z O n U Fm II 1 Ngo r m�� a no i I i� 1 m rn8 d N N� SS j I �g !n= I I cog Trn ra I 1 'm a o i 1 a b E (- 1 s i �,o ju fiat I a ' A� T-i I CIU r't.4: i IL] 1� 1L 1 .= I No i ' 1— a II I� mr minzm ..� �i A ^m l m i.i a 1 m1 I n i k. 1'j-- F H . I I I .—e I I I I i I i I I I Gull C, co • Ire) • ii o In n =• i .n t" CD V! . N : j; I T= r= 1 0 ;3 A4 f ° a . " t JDCA C IIA ! ":; IW-71 r y um 3m^ CA c9'mm 11:' ► �S 3In{ mm,. �uuJ C ��( — Z�m D o ; z8 1i Z ;a z 10 z III1I 0 :� °; .6 oi . . in iTi W W C 1/•: ' cc Z i, CO tuVi HHH 7e? �l ./) I). _ ¢m W �'MI •t Li 111 e I ,,, i. 1 a IF : 111(1. 'f: Y yyQ ,7 i d a o a ..:d' �!• u IJ IYIj s = Celt? N . . . . 'I. i w , 1 '1'10i;. .) • • .r ..» lig .c_, • O ----I-- i g _ i >— i R i i re I A a i ! i CD i A i 0 71 itmetliikaufff, ..( I R Intl- L { -------- NI til til 131i.i0 o i d _ R n s I t — K i I i 4 1 1 • A t I = I 9 R %=8 Y 4 ' Y i 2 3 c L •1 ITS —1 thew �1 r -----:, , ,A. I1111 - IIIttn 4 � -. 3 LL - '•,I.18^ t.- J O F —- sr prim rE 0 " .. ... Q LL 4 4 LL LL LL LL N 0 . . • • • •L.:.,: • _:. H O N N N N N N o tl N O 1 1_ 1 (,) 0 00 n m O O N n I.2 wN„,wwNnU.IY� iT a Mg 00 b ¢ QZ:.. 0 ct J ¢u uti o N D LL rX a wwoY ?w w n W H w F V S r LL < 4 N u.;.; r IL LL e.tW.,Q Q t J 6 a F r, I-. /(/��\) VI O O O Z Z. Z S 1=/1 2O T ', G `J 8 GD ) - ri CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner RE: Final Plat for Minnesota Valley 8th Addition DATE: June 16, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Mr. Gary Laurent of Laurent Builders, Inc., has submitted an Application for Approval of the Final Plat for Minnesota Valley 8th Addition. The proposed subdivision is located east of the Shakopee Town Square Mall, along Vierling Drive, and south of Presidential Lane. The plat covers 4.003 acres, and consists of 18 lots. It includes Outlot A of Minnesota Valley 6th Addition, and Outlots B, D, and E of Minnesota Valley 3rd Addition. The site is zoned Urban Residential (R-2). (See Exhibit A.) At their May 5, 1994, meeting, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council the approval of the Final Plat for Minnesota Valley 8th Addition, subject to conditions. Staff delayed bringing this item to the City Council so that the required vacation of portions of Vierling Drive and Presidential Lane could be reviewed by the City Council at the same meeting as the Final Plat. The Staff Report regarding the vacation is included in your June 21, 1994, City Council Agenda Packet. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The Preliminary Plat for this proposed subdivision was approved on October 19, 1993. Since the approval of the Preliminary Plat, the City has been in the process of redesigning the alignment of Vierling Drive. Recently, the exact alignment of the proposed Vierling Drive (which is being routed to the south of the proposed subdivision) has been determined. With the new alignment, the City has initiated the vacation of portions of the right-of-way for Vierling Drive and Presidential Lane that will no longer be required. To avoid confusion, staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the existing portion of Vierling Drive that is located to the west of the proposed realignment be renamed to "13th Avenue". CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan has designated this area for Single Family Residential development. This land use category allows detached housing on parcels approximately 9,000 to 12,000 square feet in size. It includes locations already developed, as well as locations for new plats. 1 2. Access to the development from the east is through a westerly extension of Vierling Drive. Access from the north will be through a continuation of the existing Presidential Lane, to the proposed extension of Vierling Drive. The portions of these roads within the plat were dedicated with Minnesota Valley 3rd Addition in 1979. The Transportation Section of the draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan has designated Vierling Drive as a collector street. This roadway classification provides both traffic movement and limited access, while interconnecting with minor arterials and providing continuous access across and around neighborhoods. A collector street within the urban area of the City has the capacity to carry 1,000 to 5,000 vehicles per day. 3. With the redesign of the alignment of Vierling Drive, City staff has initiated the following: A. The vacation of the portions of the right-of-way for Vierling Drive and Presidential Lane that will no longer be required; and B. Renaming the portion of Vierling Drive that is located to the west of the proposed realignment to "13th Avenue". 4. Typically, the City controls access to major streets in the subdivision process. With the approval of the Final Plat, Staff recommends that the developer dedicate the access rights to the proposed extension of Vierling Drive (for Lot 4 of Block 2, and Lot 7 of Block 3) in the dedication statement on the Final Plat. Access rights shall be limited by dedicating to the City the access rights in the dedication statement, and these access limitations shall be shown on the Final Plat drawing. 5. The approved Citywide Sidewalk and Trail Plans propose that a sidewalk be constructed on the north side of Vierling Drive, and that a trail be constructed on the south side of Vierling Drive. Only a portion of the proposed extension of Vierling Drive is located within the boundaries of this plat. A five foot wide sidewalk will be required to be constructed along the southern lot line of Lot 4, Block 2, and along the lot line in the southeast corner of Lot 7, Block 3. Both of these lots are located adjacent to the north side of the proposed extension of Vierling Drive. 6. The proposed plat for Minnesota Valley 8th Addition cannot be served by sanitary sewer until the adjacent property to the east develops and adequate sewer services to serve the plat can be provided. Therefore, the development of this proposed plat is dependent upon the platting of the property to the east. A condition has been recommended that prohibits the approval of any Building Permits for the site until adequate sanitary sewer can be provided. 7. The developer is not required to obtain an NPDES Permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, as the development is less than 5 acres in size. 2 8. City staff has issued a Certificate of Exemption to the Wetlands Act of 1991 to the applicant. 9. The developer has submitted a request for a one year delay in the requirement to set the iron monuments for the plat. A condition has been recommended which allows the developer to delay the setting of the iron monuments for the plat for one year from the date of the recording of the final plat, and requires that the developer provide adequate financial guarantees to ensure compliance within the one year time frame. 10. Shakopee-Public Utilities has commented that both water and electrical services will be available to the site, subject to their standard policies, charges, and requirements. 11. The City's Building Official has commented that the applicant must provide on-site observation and compaction testing of house pads by a registered professional soils engineer. 12. Scott County Environmental Health has commented that there are no environmental concerns relating to the site. However, they suggest that the construction phase include a dust control plan. 13. Since the area is not identified as a future park site in the City's draft Comprehensive Plan, Staff is recommending that a park dedication fee be collected in lieu of park land. Using the Assessed Value from the Scott County Assessor's Office in the calculation, the park dedication requirement would have been approximately $165.00 per residential lot. Based on these low calculations when using the Assessed Value, the City Council authorized the hiring of an appraiser to perform an appraisal of the parcels within this phase. On January 21, 1994, the City received an appraisal of the land for this proposed development which was performed by Paul Smith and Associates. The 4.003 acre site was appraised at $53,000.00. The required park dedication requirement would be $294.45 per lot. The dedication of land for park purposes is made at the time of the platting of the land, and cash payments are due prior to the final approval of the plat by the City Council. However, the developer for this proposed plat has submitted a request to defer the Park Dedication payments to the time of the issuance of the building permit. Due to this request, the City Council may enter into a contractual agreement to allow the park dedication payments to be deferred. This contract will designate the amount to be paid in lieu of park dedication, and is filed with the Scott County Recorder as a lien against the property. 3 14. There are special assessments against this property. The City Engineer will reapportion these assessments against the lots and the developer will waive his right to appeal the reapportionment. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has recommended the approval of the Final Plat for Minnesota Valley 8th Addition, contingent upon the vacation of the portions of the right-of-way for Vierling Drive and Presidential Lane that will no longer be required, and subject to the following conditions: 1. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the Final Plat: A. Approval of the title opinion by the City Attorney. B. Execution of a Developer's Agreement for construction of required improvements: a. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of Shakopee Public Utilities. b. Electrical system shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of Shakopee Public Utilities. c. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of Shakopee Public Utilities. d. Installation of sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Design Criteria and Standard specifications of the City of Shakopee. e. Local streets within the plat shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Design Criteria and Standard Specifications of the City of Shakopee. f. Street signs will be constructed and installed by the City of Shakopee at a cost to the developer of$250.00 each per sign pole. g. The Park Dedication Requirement shall be a cash payment in lieu of park land. The Park Dedication fees shall be deferred on a lot by lot basis and are to be paid prior to the release of each principal structure building permit. h. The applicant shall construct a five (5) foot wide sidewalk along the south lot lines of the two lots that are to be located adjacent to the north side of the proposed extension of Vierling Drive (Lot 4, Block 2, and Lot 7, Block 3). i. The City Engineer will reapportion the existing special assessments against the lots and the developer shall waive his right to appeal the reapportionment. j. The developer shall provide adequate financial guarantees to ensure that 4 the setting of the iron monuments for the plat take place within one year from the date of the recording of the final plat. C. The developer shall limit direct access from Lot 4 of Block 2, and Lot 7 of Block 3 onto the proposed extension of Vierling Drive. Access rights shall be limited by dedicating to the City the access rights in the dedication statement of the Final Plat, and these access limitations shall be shown on the Final Plat drawing. D. The developer shall provide a recordable agreement stating that not more than 10% of the plat will be developed into twin homes (2 lots). Twin homes will require separate utility connections, and sites must be identified prior to installation of utilities. 2. Approval of the Final Plat is contingent upon the following: A. The developer shall be responsible for grading of the plat as shown in the preliminary drainage plan. 3. The following must be completed prior to the approval of Building Permits for the site: A. The applicant shall provide on-site observation and compaction testing of house pads by a registered professional soils engineer when native soils are displaced or when building sites are filled. B. The proposed plat for Minnesota Valley 8th Addition is not presently served by sanitary sewer. No Building Permits shall be approved for any of the lots within the plat until adequate sanitary sewer services can be provided. ACTION REQUESTED: If the City Council elects to vacate the portions of the right-of-way for Vierling Drive and Presidential Lane that will no longer be required, the required action would be to offer Resolution No. 4029, A Resolution Approving the Final Plat for Minnesota Valley 8th Addition, and move its adoption. {CrFYCOUMFPMNVSTH.621} 5 RESOLUTION NO. 4029 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF MINNESOTA VALLEY 8TH ADDITION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee did review the Final Plat of Minnesota Valley 8th Addition on May 5, 1994, and have recommended its approval; and WHEREAS, all notices of the public hearing have been duly sent and posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, as follows: That the Final Plat of Minnesota Valley 8th Addition, described as: Outlots B, D, and E, Minnesota Valley 3rd Addition, and Outlot A, Minnesota Valley 6th Addition. is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the Final Plat: A. Approval of the title opinion by the City Attorney. B. Execution of a Developer's Agreement for construction of required improvements: a. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of Shakopee Public Utilities. b. Electrical system shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of Shakopee Public Utilities. c. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of Shakopee Public Utilities. d. Installation of sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Design Criteria and Standard specifications of the City of Shakopee. e. Local streets within the plat shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Design Criteria and Standard Specifications of the City of Shakopee. f. Street signs will be constructed and installed by the City of Shakopee at a cost to the developer of$250.00 each per sign pole. g. The Park Dedication Requirement shall be a cash payment in lieu of park land. The Park Dedication fees shall be deferred on a lot by lot basis and are to be paid prior to the release of each principal structure building permit. h. The applicant shall construct a five (5) foot wide sidewalk along the south lot lines of the two lots that are to be located adjacent to the north side of the proposed extension of Vierling Drive (Lot 4, Block 2, and Lot 7, Block 3). i. The City Engineer will reapportion the existing special assessments against the lots and the developer shall waive his right to appeal the reapportionment. j. The developer shall provide adequate financial guarantees to ensure that the setting of the iron monuments for the plat take place within one year from the date of the recording of the final plat. C. The developer shall limit direct access from Lot 4 of Block 2, and Lot 7 of Block 3 onto the proposed extension of Vierling Drive. Access rights shall be limited by dedicating to the City the access rights in the dedication statement of the Final Plat, and these access limitations shall be shown on the Final Plat drawing. D. The developer shall provide a recordable agreement stating that not more than 10% of the plat will be developed into twin homes (2 lots). Twin homes will require separate utility connections, and sites must be identified prior to installation of utilities. 2. Approval of the Final Plat is contingent upon the following: A. The developer shall be responsible for grading of the plat as shown in the preliminary drainage plan. 3. The following must be completed prior to the approval of Building Permits for the site: A. The applicant shall provide on-site observation and compaction testing of house pads by a registered professional soils engineer when native soils are displaced or when building sites are filled. B. The proposed plat for Minnesota Valley 8th Addition is not presently served by sanitary sewer. No Building Permits shall be approved for any of the lots within the plat until adequate sanitary sewer services can be provided. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Plat and Developer's Agreement. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney 7 • EXHIBIT A • ;,1.*••• rem - ' .• \.......;.......... ��-i .i•• '' i ,8-J t/ ' i ^• �^/� I}�.h -'`_� J ly /". '..' . ; • ... ... : • i 1 rte" ll {_'. (76 aE — _ _ � its _ ' 1' .fit' ,� �'.. ...~ r-5-----: -;-i:"j F '_ _;"�I _ ---n--1 .e a -_''-.--- s-) '---77; _'_TN :r R 7. r."--":777:77-. I •.' t ` ': .�,..1 -- i._.: t~Y�. -.� n i- 7._—. 7,-4' _4'�+ •-•••.• V ;------- .� • t . ` • __S --i �l /j •�, �``, Y•1 - .�-�. 4,4� \ L,.�.-may i-:-.21;;;..--! . t` 1 .-ter '- '. � •'-_-`1i•,`j_i:' ii�ii:i ;�....•- - L.._-?-1 "..i- " .%.G AGRICULTURE `t R1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL %! R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL i "°" R3 MID-DENSITY RES. 1 044, - R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. I I B1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS - i ' . B2 COMMUNITY BUSINESS - B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS ___- :11 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL . i I2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL S SHORELAND - ' . FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT . • -•-•• MANDATORY PUD • • RTD RACETRACK DISTRICT (:.4e :.-- Zoning Map City of SHAKOPEE m li CN I 11.!%i6 "- . CaM S6 �� �`' N 01b4'43'W 135.081 w I O� 8I g N 01'04'43' W 149.87 I z m ZO 2,m 4 fnZ730 L - oN N m;g $ (� J a y mot 11 8 I 8I �N KN ?;CP2 N 1. <: t_ saa'u•[ J -Z xZ Cm-1� � E • A m J �� 18 .r. N ,.J 8I �> 02 ?A Njmy Z I- ,3&a '; 1 I ." ', z r,I 2 .El LI 2 _ 0>> 2 2 or K saa'r[ 1853 I m w t Ng �Vo _ Ia sl �, m 1 r IAa I Z S Olb'ar[ J -1 y n-< 13 Y I8 4• $I 14 I— o g g ��_ L ,......r, Jm v I: 1 G 2 O m 1.N _I ., m s �� -+ sl —. --m T N s CO ;I t 1 h- sats[ J 1` 82-,"7' 1 ' 1 Is �" sI �^ L s aa.u. 1 I— uf.,, F •-J v, r Ip J 'g �' 8I O r ,3&a `' C7 A L w aa•.r_Lola J N50024'43' 0 04 4'43'w > 0 I� " sI m 1 I —.4%.'MA—'Cl r'rig-7 a zaa'u•[ y 1..: 7 I C) I I. I 4 018 1 a Z D I- xi.w -I 7Y A O 0) $I i3 V I . C ml I C \ I! �, rfir;: "I Ix I m y Z I C I P_ � s ..12'.—_°._.°—J L aoo J C) 1' �-- T ''i o 2 60 l • S 00.30'22' E 184.66 O Z I 6 \ )_ .,•r PRELANS..EUiY�v. O 2 \ , •$ B7, yQl�� N 00'30'22'W 159.22 . > 98� \ 1 I'• "' r ./J r, Z I a ,� �`\., 661:1tlftt�j3 r[r,f-i (—sam 1 r)aw m z ,.11' "'6 �2 T \ i.�r:a zl I I I 1 e r�9' Ci ,.o T \ o S' I I 11.y 3, I , 1 lig \ ;'' ' t:(11.1 13 roil P� ) I c� 0 '"'. ) 4'' I I( I' ,orf l I ,;,,�'�I,m -..":•,. 1<,I.n , 1 s.f I )y,Jwoo J Lrua....I a <� I <'S 0'22'E 272.05 co \ rel / `/ w \I .1I7I n2."4,///0/1„/ $� z e jj9 i > ' =i rr x f €sJI1 f _p1. li 1 EMII f4; g .� 141;111 ig; 'II! _11 ri il 1 2 I e'` ' al z . € i t} 3 IW,A•Itttifr1 Y I: f 4 axif } £ ' t it i 11 gii!it ?ll hi l ! f 1 v Ff i t I . ?g ii 1I Y{� �Q Stjf ♦♦9♦♦♦ fillti i ! I.i t If01 .i ! ; }}•7d 111t i t= •I ?S I $ t ?Il r e e ?} 8 ; . 4 1rat 121 gt 2 111 2 a3 d`ac £ f4pt p YI�t Pt O .t I }'' N s 1 xfZ? eI 1 ° I1P Fr rot; P? Ili 2pw p_i1I 'S iy$ i iaS f : 8 v I ! I i .; £ .1 g '�tt tfs 1 A $ 2 _I 1 z I PI i p ; 1 g$ 3 t 1;II is "! c 11. w'3 4 .4.4!. 13! xI IIa CI ? _f f "it t i g g( t t� $x Ig ff ; $;} If, �1 ¢'�t=i �} $gam I}ep j ! t F "i } f ift1 r1 0 I 18 ggill It$ ; I s i =i I3 I 4 .i. ' s` I t i EN 1 t i I " 1. r[I1 $ Ii Yii I £ : � a 4 � . NI t >i 1 d I c ? F c t f s #E I t t I c � � t i I Ifrt i � !I' tili. f! 4�. � cl i��' � � � � i t Vrtit s I t I t ' i 71tg .= I it 141 < 11114•! !IQ et III 11 i 1 3 III I N • It I 8 $ ?_ / l J [-J . • • .a 4 ! 0— ›, . ! w W . a N un N 1. ri .M Sr., O' 0 • 4 - e-• et 2 . 0 O . ..i Iìd• I'• •gii ' s.•71,S. 5- g�W n F' ; o„ VI E :s N• o m4 LL ! • Z < O ...5 t .m. cO > LLH„W IMMUNE. a 04 TL t a s< i i z 4 ai H ^ o ^ n °^ w ..O.N n a si 3 N a cW �� w o$ 30 ° i h t;b: CIa . $ .ti ;i> _ = o - V, KF o < p W O 1• : i, F N'o' g O Z w F. H r > t. >la 5 y° ^ 11ZZWJJ °. . Q W C r N 7 N O V _3 O j ry Fl ie N A ze,yl O K a VIZ O ¢mW 3 ° <1 s Z O O Y°' Y _"3w Z J q< O VJ�N VI oOF 1 CO ao r:"_:: / `.::r .( ;1.1':rr:•'. ..I,.; !. t :!.:`.:,I\ I .14•;;.•1-.: 1 SN MMIIIMIVIILM.. 77VA VJAGMN/IIIY'V OWN) q I.•31I..r .y: ?, ,.i �, .0 W SU. '3.ZZ.Oti"u'S; O .OQ o '3.Zi:oc:o'S N-1 __ s--- ---96.9SIr til I4. I . 60'SZt...•I • wo F. .- roo+6a ll�Yts,y Tt '1 1. t 4 ,.. IW , c, y .I FNS , F' itIi pout'.1 W 2 . 1 r,_;11.iiKr • a▪"_ ,. I ,,,;•.,• IT• 1 'V,t..`IP s el'h -r � I , Lt.o'...-...1'r•, I ' \ U .� .--,p ,I 1,__L,,,,:`C 1 '-i »AY, L_.`_` ',,.•1 ! •" — ''s ; - ' ? _ Jm N •..Ai"i 7.7,Fill---- •5••••72,0S..07.1 -•U•t91-- /• I_. .l I .•I 6.oc.o 1, f _ otIC F-0 W a...w 1tj _ iM 7.t,0C.ON t , •M»tL.00.0)1 , 1 01 -I O W J= .1a\avwn/YIiMI-3 r° i/1_ • ' 1.2 ! I.y,S ../% I\ \ i F Y i ,,1. Y z .3 J,� 1 . I I.1..f .:Jt.,1I ., �,S Q a LL a D +.....r.,.....i"'„9:zS-O 3. 5 '3:iLoc 0•s\ \ � • y 3 In ± mE d } ...0 •. •'.-. .._46•lst..- ' �_.II--i•+ I 1 \.,. ...:soci \ t4 . F`o 5• I Lal :.:47Y..:9 I- 1' e i 1 � I 1 1 ' ,I r . 1\ \ \ z� .. I °°r a 1111!' :i A I 1?J t' NI 1 i I I 1 , _ •,t 12 o� eye/``•�IIY-I.C•'ar�A i•1 'I_ 1\ `1 I�—No t '� 1— ���`-1 1 \ �\ -1-0.-i.14 I—�� 11 1 0 LL o 1 fff 111 „ V r ( ) Nz_z ''-Zo'OS \ to's���}}, \\ ` 1 1 1 �Itl �`� \ Q . g.�. Wm&N 7,i,s..40.r),), r rw11n , I - \ \ gI lf, l R i , Z }-i II' 41�.:I\ ;: \�e \N \,,OLA-"Iiis7.1-"':t ot\\ . Z o.▪}LL s 'ILI—.si,1. .c7- 1 1 I.1: I t: ' . � =Z ;r___1z /.� �0.1(h ;_,,7, I W ,gl \ ): • •.r,Q r\ F'=F _... 1 I4• I I mT I 1 Nu I \ •C't, `,\ �Ia a� _O t \ ONS w .Y/ M I I• (� QO u ` N z'\' 0 0 1 I ''l 1 i f.Y .n .M.CY I'N l VI . . WWW g a1LI., � ..J1= r—.—I� ,; a I I _rr 4..II a,. / 1 `1a I` C. 151\ — — — •pp M'r• YY1 l� 1\ g_I •wl U. -'tip wi w..M.l zzz W w W -'i' ' ��Y1 \[.� �/ ......;:c.,,,4i r \ I • M .t Io\ ')a oY • .t .x `1 • I W moo SI� L. Ig o I__.—_.:1`.y:: I,_J` �11,-,,"'s,„ m W •a Cv 150'521 `\ `>l V .••• `II I� 1 \•L I-�_. •M.i1�r0.'^N ` •gyp K (n /I_ - \ -5 -. _ r--\ t.. \ :", a N • M 44,1,0„114• I �, ( -s : I. .... . ..i j A.- I � ;J _�.g9:7•1/ :J,.� ILti�-j-).in 1:!, ,^l1;V \ . ; ;; \ �sosal••• l., I ,i.r r M�yV101Nr` o -- _-: l S a. MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SUBJECT: Pawnshop and Pawnbroker's Licenses B & B Pawn DATE: June 21, 1994 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The check received from B & B Pawn for a Pawnshop License was returned to the City for insufficient funds. The applicant was advised on June 16th and asked to submit cash or a certified check. As of 4 : 30 p.m. this date, payment has not been made. ($480 = $330 investigation fee and $150 for a six month license) / Set,' MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk Karen Marty, City Attorney SUBJECT: Pawnshop and Pawnbroker's Licenses DATE: June 17, 1994 INTRODUCTION: On April 19, 1994 , the City Council adopted an ordinance requiring the licensing of pawnbrokers, precious metal dealers, secondhand dealers, pawnshops, and their employees. The City has approved applications for two pawnshops and their employees for licenses previously and a third application is now ready for City Council consideration. BACKGROUND: The City has received an application from Douglas L. Bell to operate as a pawnbroker, precious metal dealer and secondhand dealer at B & B Sales & Service Inc. dba/B & B Pawn, 137 N. Naumkeag Street. The police department has conducted the customary background investigations on Mr. Bell and his three employees. As a result of the investigations the Chief of Police has advised that the applicant is not in compliance with the ordinance and therefore does not meet the requirements to be licensed. DISCUSSION: City Code Sec. 6. 02 makes it unlawful for any applicant to intentionally make a false statement or omission upon any application form. Any false statement or willful omission works "an automatic refusal of license" . At the City Council meeting of June 7 , the applicant stated that he was in compliance with all provisions of the City Code; he just needed the Police Department to complete its background investigation. This statement was not true, as listed below. In addition, one of the employees falsely stated that he has never been convicted of a crime. His license must be denied. City Code Sec. 6. 03 , Subd. 5 contains the general provisions for the City Council in granting a license. It provides that "The Council may, for any reasonable cause, refuse to grant any application, or revoke any license. No license shall be granted to a person of questionable . . . business reputation. " Reasonable cause to deny a license to B & B Pawn includes the following: Persistent failure to comply with the sign requirements of the City Code, despite repeated communication from and with city staff. Failure to come into compliance with the pawnshop ordinance, by: Employing a minor, in violation of Sec. 6.28, Subd. 5.0 Failing to run a videotape with an automatic date and time stamp, in violation of Sec. 6.28, Subd. 7.B Failing to provide records to the Police Department containing the information required by Sec. 6.28, Subd. 8. Placing pawned items for sale prior to the expiration of the holding period or the redemption period. The Chief of Police is recommending denial of the licenses. ALTERNATIVES: 1] Approve licenses and employees 2] Deny licenses and approval of employees RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative number 2, denial of a business license, the pawnbrokers license and of employees. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to deny a Pawnshop License to B & B Sales & Service Inc. dba/B & B Pawn, 137 N. Naumkeag Street, and a pawnbroker license to Douglas L. Bell and his three employees for the following reasons: failure to comply with the sign regulations in a timely manner (City Code Sec. 4 . 30) and failure to comply with the pawnshop requirements (City Code Sec. 6.28) . A vote in the positive will deny the licenses. CET i • F3r7 NORIII NL(JftThtLG ST 1:11 1-,1 it wd. THIS IS YOUR RECEIPT . . . YOU WILL NEED THIS TO REDEEM . . CALL 445-5223 1149 6/21/94 CUSTOMER INFO Name <WorkPlace Address rPhone (W) City/St/Zip - Pawn ID . FTag]# Phone (H ) TIME B-Day <Employee# CODE# > ID# & TYPE R/Sx/Ht/Wt Description Amount 0 . 00 ; I NEARBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PROPERTY IS FREE OF ANY LIENS , ' MORTGAGES , RENTALS ,OR ANY CLAIM BY ANY OTHER PARTY . . . IN THE EVENT OF MY FAILURE TO REDEEM THE DESCRIBED PROPERY WITHIN 30-DAYS FROM THIS DATE , THIS SHALL BE CONSIDERED A BILL OF SALE WITHOUT ANY NOTICE TO ME ,AND MY COLLATERAL SHALL BE FORFEITED . . . WE ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR LOSS BY FIRE , THEFT, VERMIN, HOLDUP BURGLARY, OR THEN FOR NO MORE THAN THE AMT OF LOAN UNDER ALL OTHER CASES . . . CASH AMOUNT LOANED> , SIGNATURE DUE DATE <1994> Subtotal 0 . 00 Total $0 iAmount Paid $0 ' Amount Due $0 • V,(4) k \ is v . .k. � w `al for MULDER,JULIE ANN +w+6-,,,.- % Total for 1110 1111 6/18/94 6 MONNENS,JULIE MARY 2:52 6-23-61 M552454587480 W/F/56/ 130 2 FAKE PAGERS Subtotal for MONNENS,JULIE MARY Total for 1111 1112 6/18/94 6 STORLIE,JANEEN MAR 11:40 6/1859 S364364585467DL W/F/56/ 200 LEATHER JACKETS BRN/HZ 6/21/94 Customer Detail Page 2 Date Range: 6/18/94 thru 6/20/94 Sorted by: Invoice # & Customer 'T, n^.e p6 4 Invoice # Date Month Customer S' eID# & TYPE R/Sx/Ht /Wt ITEM(s) & <SERIAL># HAIR/EY Subtotal for STORLIE,JANEEN MARIE Total for 1112 1113 6/18/94 6 FISCHER,DOUGLAS MA 3;30 112773 F260149585906DL W/M/56/ 150 JVC<09492931> BRN/BL Subtotal for FISCHER,DOUGLAS MARTIN Total for 1113 1114 6/18/94 6 NELSON,KEITH WILLI 4:00 7/1/52 K425465887521DL W/M/64/ 210 ATARI 5200<122173> BRN/BL Subtotal for NELSON,KEITH WILLIAM Total for 1114 1115 6/18/94 6 LUND, JANICE ARLEN 4:08 68/48 L530368071430DL W/F/54/ 125 TOOLS BLD/BL suhtatAl for LUND. JANICE ARLENE - - b TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: 1993 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report DATE: June 14, 1994 Introduction Enclosed is the 1993 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and from the auditor's the Management Letter, representation letter and materials for the Council presentation. Background Highlights of the report and of 1993 activity are reviewed in the transmittal letter contained in the beginning of the CAFR. Two items Council should be particularly aware of are the 12/31/93 General Fund - Fund Balance and the Sewer Fund operating income. The General Fund - Fund Balance at year end was at 26% while the target set by Council is 15%. Council usually transfers the amount over the target to the Capital Equipment Fund. The actual motion to make the transfer will be brought back for Council action at a later meeting. The amount over the target is due to revenues being higher than budgeted, primarily permits, and expenditures being under budget in several areas including pavement preservation (no 1993 program saving $93,000) . The sewer fund had a negative operating income partially due to increased MWCC fees because of a wet year and increased inflow and infiltration. Council did increase sewer fees 13% effective 1/1/94. Deloitte & Touche, the auditors, will make a presentation to Council on their finding similar to last year. Present at the meeting will be Mr. Cliff Hoffman and MS. Kelly Curtin. The audit this year was a positive audit in that the management letter contains suggestions for improvements rather than noting deficiencies or corrections needed. The Finance Department would like to be able to provide the CAFR to Council in May rather than late June for a variety of reasons. The biggest factors in not being able to do so is the timing of the receipt of the annual reports from the Fire Relief Association and the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. The City would have to receive those reports no later than the end of March in order to complete the CAFR in May. This year the SPUC report was received 5/3 and the Fire Relief was received 6/7. Action Move to accept the 1993 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and auditor's report. TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: 1993 Auditor's Comments Follow-up DATE: June 14, 1994 Introduction This memo contains staff's recommendations on the auditor's management letter comments. The management letter is enclosed. Background Auditor's comments and staff recommendation are as follows; 1. Establish enterprise fund for refuse collection. The state also suggests that refuse be an enterprise fund. Staff has not made or recommended the change before because the activity is so narrowly focused with one contract for collection and the City just tries to cover costs - not make a "profit" that it just did not seem worthwhile to have a separate enterprise fund. Costs are increasing as is the dollar volume so it probably is time to make the change. 2 . Establish internal service fund for equipment. This is a repeat recommendation from last year and staff recommended it be implemented. Council declined to implement. 3 . Increasing sewer rates. The Council adopted a 3% increase for 1993 and a 13% increase for 1994 . Activity in the sewer fund has increased significantly in the past couple of years with reconstruction, comprehensive sewer issues, Chaska Interceptor, etc. with an impact on costs. As part of the 1995 budget and annual fee resolution, staff will probably be recommending an increase in sewer rates for 1995. 4 . Showing MWCC charges as separate line on SPUC utility bill . MWCC charges represent about 85% of the sewer bill. Showing this separately on the billing (SPUC billing) would be similar to showing a separate purchased power adjustment for electric billing. For those customers who compare prior billings, it would show increases due to MWCC vs. the City. However, due to some of the events mention above, the cost of the City operation has been increasing also and the separate billing line would delineate that fact. Council would have to request SPUC to reprogram to show the MWCC cost separately. 5. Popular Reporting. Staff did try a form of a popular report several years ago and the interest in the product did not justify the effort and the cost. If Council desires, staff can produce a report in some form that is more easily understood by the public. One alternative option would be to include some information or charts in an issue of the city newsletter. Council will recall that there is very summarized information published in the local newspaper each year. Staff only very rarely gets an inquiry from the general public on the finances of the City unless it is very specific (is there money for a community center) or is related to taxes and the budget/tax levy hearings. 6. Depreciation on contributed assets. The City has been closing out depreciation to retained earnings simply because it started doing it that way and not that it was a specific decision to do it that way. Finance has been considering the change for years and part of the reason for not changing has been waiting for rule making by higher accounting authorities. Rule making has not happened. Staff recommends changing practice to closing out depreciation on contributed assets to contributed capital instead of retained earnings. However, all enterprise funds should be consistent and therefore Council is requested to make a request to SPUC to change also. Action Requested 1. Move to establish an enterprise fund for refuse collection/recycling. 2 . Discuss and give staff direction if Council wants to establish an internal service fund for capital equipment. 3 . Move that Council study the issue of sewer rates as part of the 1995 budget. 4 . Move to request SPUC to modify the utility billing to permit the City to show the MWCC part of the sewer billing separately. 5. Discuss and give staff direction on whether Council wants to put any resources toward popular financial reporting. 6. Move to request SPUC to change to charging depreciation on contributed assets back to contributed capital and if SPUC concurs, change the sewer and storm drainage funds accordingly. CONSENT 1 MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Application for Massage Center License DATE: June 14, 1994 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Application has been made by Dawn M. Krause, 238 South Lewis Street, for a massage center license. She plans on offering therapeutic massage as a service at her place of business, Klip & Kurl, 238 S. Lewis. Ms. Krause will be providing the therapeutic massages and has applied for a masseuse license which is being processed. The police department was provided the appropriate information for the background investigation on all personnel employed by Klip & Kurl. They have conducted the appropriate investigations on Ms. Krause and her employees. Chief Steininger has advised me that the investigation into the applications submitted disclosed nothing which would preclude issuing the licenses requested. The building inspector has inspected the premises for compliance with Ordinance No. 310, which requires compliance with building and plumbing regulations. The premises are in compliance with the requirements for providing therapeutic massage. Ordinance No. 310 also requires public liability insurance to be carried by the licensee. The certificate of insurance submitted does not meet the cancellation notification requirement and is being corrected. I expect to receive a corrected certificate by the June 21st meeting. Assuming that the corrected certificate of insurance is filed by June 21st, the application for a massage center license will be in order. If the required certificate of insurance is not provided by June 21st, City Council will be so advised. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve application and grant a license 2 . Deny a license 3 . Table the application for additional information 4 . Approve application and grant a license conditioned upon filing an appropriate certificate of insurance RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends alternative No. 1, approve the application and grant a massage center license to Dawn M. Krause, Klip & Kurl, 238 S. Lewis. (And alternative #4 , if certificate of insurance is not in order by June 21st. ) MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SUBJECT: June 21, 1994 Agenda Updates DATE: June 21, 1994 CO SENT 1] Massage Center License /5c_ Certificate of Insurance not in order. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to approve the application and grant a massage center license to Dawn M. Krause, Klip & Kurl, 238 S. Lewis upon receipt of the required certificate of insurance. COriT3ENT 2] 1994 Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor Licenses All applications are in order. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to approve all applications and grant licenses. aN T 13 �. 3] 1994 Into icenses Certificate of Insurance not in order for Springers on Main, Inc. (Delivery expected before meeting! ) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve all applications and grant licenses (except Springers) . Move to approve the applications and grant On Sale and Sunday On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses to Springers On Main, Inc. (upon receipt of the required certificate of insurance) . CONSENT l5C) MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator SUBJECT: Resolution and Annexation Agreement DATE: June 15, 1994 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Attached is a resolution and agreement relating to the orderly annexation of Jackson Township property (lying north of the Shakopee Bypass) into the City of Shakopee. These documents represent a culmination of discussions which have taken place for some time between Jackson Township and City officials. Copies of the resolution and agreement were sent to Mr. Norbert Theis on June 3rd. According to Rose Menke, Town Clerk, the Jackson Town Board will also be considering the documents at their meeting on June 21st. Ms. Menke has provided us with signed, notarized waivers from 30 property owners. They have been verified by the Engineering Department for accuracy of property ownership. Four property owners have not signed the waivers, although they were all sent letters. Ms. Menke explained that one party does not occupy the house and another party just put in a new well. According to Ms. Menke, any further attempt to contact these parties would have to be by the City of Shakopee. Anyone who did not sign a waiver agreeing to a predetermined special assessment will be subject to the larger assessment which may occur as a result of the cost of the public improvements. ALTERNATIVES: 1] Approve documents 2] Do not approve documents 3] Amend documents RECOMMENDED ACTION: Offer Resolution No. 4012, A Joint Resolution For Orderly Annexation By The City Of Shakopee And The Township Of Jackson, and move its adoption; and, authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the Orderly Annexation Agreement with Jackson Township. June 6, 1994 Jackson Township 1060 Oak Road Shakopee, MN 55379 City of Shakopee 128 Holmes Shakopee, Mn 55379 ATTN: Judy Cox RE: Waivers for P & V Additions Dear Judy: Enclosed please find copies of thirty waivers that are signed by the residents of P & V Additions . All of the residents did not sign one. The Supervisors of Jackson Township said that they felt it was up to the City to contact the ones who did not and see if they would sign a waiver at this time. Sincerely Afttelp09)11442) Roselyn Menke Jackson Township Clerk CnvOFeIw , JUN 6 1994 ECEIVE 6t1tSPL e o - wllo} ► Ut & WAIVER nl THIS WAIVER, is made this I ' day of �' I, '-' 7 </ s 1994 , between the City of Shakopee, State of Minnesot , hereinafter referred to as the City and . > f• _ . _i /1 �'?i i N, • "''fl ; (name) (name) of Jackson Township, Scott County, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the owner. In consideration of the action of the City Council to cause the construction of sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermain, and street construction within the P & V Addition and the P & V Second Addition and to assess 100% of the cost of the improvements, up to $8, 000. 00 per lot, to the owner. Owner agrees to pay such costs, up to $8 , 000. 00 per lot, as may be determined by the Council of the City to be a fair apportionment of the costs of said improvements. Owner expressly waives objection to any irregularity with regard to the said improvement assessments and any claim that the amount thereof levied against owner's property is excessive, together with all right to appeal in the courts. In testimony, whereof, the owner, has hereunto set his or her hand, the day and year first above written. 301 Lo iv ouJ/ D S/7 �7(32 g, OL --- Address 7-71 Id Lot OTIC Block ON£ " 7/Ylit7 -// P & V Addition Owner STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF SCOTT ) On this L__ day of 0/44 , 1994 before me, the Township C1 rk f ackson T(6wnship, Scot C`un �.'dx f rsonally appeared r.�.Qd.BiJ and �. as their being sworn, d d say that said instrument was executed free act and deed. kr.,4i AWL/ Roselyn enke, Township Clerk Jackson Township This instrument was drafted by: City of Shakopee 129 Holmes St. South Shakopee, MN 55379 ORDERLY ANNEXATION AGREEMENT This Agreement, made and entered into this day of , 1994 , by and between the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, with offices at 129 S . Holmes St . , Shakopee, MN 55379, and the Township of Jackson, Minnesota, with offices at WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee and the Township of Jackson desire to accommodate growth in the most orderly fashion; and WHEREAS, a joint orderly annexation agreement between the parties hereto is beneficial to both parties from the standpoint of orderly planning and orderly transition of government within the area proposed to be annexed, and provides the guidelines under which such annexation shall take place. NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the City of Shakopee and the Township of Jackson that the property herein is proposed to be annexed by the City of Shakopee and shall be annexed subject to the following terms and conditions : 1. The property which is covered by this orderly annexation agreement is legally described as follows : A. Property in Section 12 , Township 115, Range 23 , described as follows : The South half of the Southeast quarter (S 1/2 SE 1/4) ; and The Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter (NE 1/4 SW 1/4) ; and That part of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter (NW 1/4 SW 1/4) described as follows : Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter thence southerly along the east line of said Northwest quarter of Southwest quarter a distance of 596 . 20 feet to a point 1954 . 54 feet southerly from the Northeast corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 12 , said 1954 . 54 feet measured along the east lines of said Southwest quarter of Northwest quarter and Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter; thence Westerly parallel with a line drawn at right angles to the east line of said Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter a distance of 484 . 10 feet ; thence Northerly parallel with :he east line of said Northwest quarter of Southwest quarter a distance of 643 . 27 feet more or less to the north line of said Northwest c arter of the Southwest quarter; thence easterly along the north line of said Northwest quarter of Southwest quarter a distance of 485 . 95 feet more or less to the point of beginning; and The South half of the Southwest c.tarter (S 1/2 SW 1/4) . B . Together with property in Section 11, Range 115, Range 23 , described as follows : The South 10 . 0 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter (SE 1/4 SE 1/4) ; and The Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter (SW 1/4 SE 1/4) ; and That part of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter (SE 1/4 SW 1/4) lying north of the centerline of Trunk Highway 101 Bypass (which is expected to be renumbered to Highway 169 after construction) . 2 . This property is adjacent to the City of Shakopee . 3 . Within three years after annexation, the City of Shakopee shall provide public sanitary sewer to this property. Shakopee Public Utilities shall make available to this property municipal water and electricity, subject to standard SPUC policies which apply to other similar properties and customers . Water will be available upon completion of the regular procedures for City of Shakopee public improvement projects. Electric service is available upon application to the Shakopee Utilities, except for the area described below. After December 10, 1995 the City of Shakopee and Shakopee Utilities will endeavor to secure the right to furnish electric service in the area described as follows: That part of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter (SE 1/4 SW 1/4) lying north of the centerline of Trunk Highway 101 Bypass (future Highway 169) . 4 . The parties agree to the following division of tax revenues from and special assessments for local improvements to the property: (a) Property taxes : Taxes based on the 1994 tax capacity shall be paid to the Township of Jackson each year, ending on December 31, 1999 . The amount of any current taxes which exceed the 2994 tax capacity shall be paid to the City of Shakopee . (b) Special assessments : The property shall not be assessed for utility and street improvements until either (1) said improvements have been determined by the City to benefit the property as required by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, or (2) the property owners have provided the City with signed waivers of their appeal rights . ._ y assessments shall follow standard City policy. Special assessment payments shall be paid to the City of Shakopee . 5 . As a condition precedent to annexation, authority from the appropriate metropolitan governmental agencies to change and adjust the "MUSA line" boundary to include the property designated for 2 annexation shall be obtained. The 30-day period for approval of this Joint Resolution for Annexation by the Minnesota Municipal Board under Minn. Stat . Sec . 414 . 0325, Subd. 1, shall be withheld until such authority has been obtained. The 30-day period for approval also shall be delayed until a survey description is provided to the Minnesota Municipal Board if they deem it advisable or necessary. 6 . The property shall be zoned according to the normal zoning designation procedure in the City. The City of Shakopee Comprehensive Plan shall guide the City in arriving at the appropriate zoning of the property. It is presently the intent of the City to zone this property for urban residential development, R-2, following all due process including a public hearing as required by law. The City Council shall act upon the recommendation of the City Planning Commission within 60 days after receiving the order of the Municipal Board for annexation of the property. 7 . The City of Shakopee and the Township of Jackson agree that no alteration of the stated boundaries of the property is appropriate . Furthermore, the parties agree that no consideration by the Municipal Board is necessary, except as hereinabove provided. Upon receipt of this resolution, passed and adopted by each party, the Municipal Board may review and comment, but shall, within thirty (30) days, order the annexation in accordance with the terms of this joint resolution. Executed the date and year first above written. Township of Jackson, Minnesota City of Shakopee, Minnesota By By Town Board Chair Mayor By By Town Board Clerk City Administrator By Shakopee Public Utilities City Clerk By Chair By Secretary [lANX] 3 A JOINT RESOLUTION FOR ORDERLY ANNEXATION BY THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE AND THE TOWNSHIP OF JACKSON WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee and the Township of Jackson desire to accommodate growth in the most orderly fashion; and WHEREAS, a joint orderly annexation agreement between the parties hereto is beneficial to both parties from the standpoint of orderly planning and orderly transition of government within the area proposed to be annexed, and provides the guidelines under which such annexation shall take place. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City of Shakopee and the Township of Jackson that the property herein is proposed to be annexed by the City of Shakopee and shall be annexed subject to the following terms and conditions : 1 . The property which is covered by this orderly annexation acreement is legally described as follows : A. Property in Section 12, Township 115, Range 23 , described as follows : The South half of the Southeast quarter (S 1/2 SE 1/4) ; and The Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter (NE 1/4 SW 1/4) ; and That part of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter (NW 1/4 SW 1/4) described as follows : Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter thence southerly along the east line of said Northwest quarter of Southwest quarter a distance of 596 . 20 feet to a point 1954 . 54 feet southerly from the Northeast corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 12, said 1954 . 54 feet measured alone the east lines of said Southwest quarter of Northwest quarter and Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter; thence Westerly parallel with a line drawn at right angles to the east line cf said Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter a distance of 484 . 10 feet; thence Northerly parallel with the east line of said Northwest quarter of Southwest quarter a distance of 643 . 27 feet more or less to the north line cf said Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter; thence easterly along the north line of said Northwest quarter of Southwest quarter a distance of 485 . 95 feet more or less to the point of beginning; and The South half of the Southwest quarter (S 1/2 SW 1/4) . B. Together with property in Section 11, Range 115 , Range 23 , described as follows : The South 10 . 0 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter (SE 1/4 SE 1/4) ; and The Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter (SW 1/4 SE 1/4) ; and That part of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter (SE 1/4 SW 1/4) lying north of the centerline of Trunk Highway 101 Bypass (which is expected to be renumbered to Highway 169 after construction) . 2 . This property is adjacent to the City of Shakopee . 3 . Within three years after annexation, the City of Shakopee shall provide public sanitary sewer to this property. Shakopee Public Utilities shall make available to this property municipal water and electricity, subject to standard SPUC policies which apply to other similar properties and customers . Water will be available upon completion of the regular procedures for City of Shakopee public improvement projects. Electric service is available upon application to the Shakopee Utilities, except for the area described below. After December 10, 1995 the City of Shakopee and Shakopee Utilities will endeavor to secure the right to furnish electric service in the area described as follows : That part of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter (SE 1/4 SW 1/4) lying north of the centerline of Trunk Highway 101 Bypass (future Highway 169) . 4 . The parties agree to the following division of tax revenues from and special assessments for local imprc-:ements to the property: (a) Property taxes : Taxes based on the 1994 tax capacity shall be paid to the Township of Jackson each year, ending on December 31, 1999 . =he amount of any current taxes which exceed the 1994 tax capacity shall be paid to the City of Shakopee . (b) Special assessments : The property shall not be assessed for utility and street improvements until either (1) said improvements have been determined by the City to benefit the property as required by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, or (2) the property owners have _rovided the City with signed wa:vers of their appeal rights . Any assessments shall follow standard City policy. Special assessment payments shall be paid to the Cit•: of Shakopee . 5 . As a condition precedent to annexation, authority from the appropriate metropolitan governmental agencies to change and adjust the "MUSA line" boundary to include the property designated for annexation shall be obtained. The 30-day period for approval cf this Joint Resolution for Annexation by the Minnesota Municipal Board under Minn. Stat . Sec . 414 . 0325, Subd. 1 , shall be withheld 2 until such authority has been obtained. The 30-day period for approval also shall be delayed until a survey description is provided to the Minnesota Municipal Board if they deem it advisable or necessary. 6 . The property shall be zoned according to the normal zoning designation procedure in the City. The City of Shakopee Comprehensive Plan shall guide the City in arriving at the appropriate zoning of the property. It is presently the intent of the City to zone this property for urban residential development, R-2, following all due process including a public hearing as required by law. The City Council shall act upon the recommendation of the City Planning Commission within 60 days after receiving the order of the Municipal Board for annexation of the property. 7 . The City of Shakopee and the Township of Jackson agree that no alteration of the stated boundaries of the property is appropriate. Furthermore, the parties agree that no consideration by the Municipal Board is necessary, except as hereinabove provided. Upon receipt of this resolution, passed and adopted by each party, the Municipal Board may review and comment, but shall, within thirty (30) days, order the annexation in accordance with the terms of this joint resolution. Approved by the City of Shakopee this day of 1994 . City Clerk Mayor Approved by :he Township of Jackson this day of , 1994 . Town Board Chair Town Board Clerk [ANX] 3 1 -e) MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Fuller Street Realignment DATE; June 16, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Scott County is requesting City of Shakopee direction on the design and construction of the Fuller Street realignment. BACKGROUND: In 1991, the City Council directed staff to prepare an report on alternatives for the realignment of County Road (C.R.) 77. The alternative study report recommended realigning C.R. 77 to Fuller Street to provide a collector street feeder to the Minibypass (See attached Alternative 3C) and on August 6, 1991 the City Council adopted this report. Scott County agreed to this concept and it was generally agreed that the existing C.R. 77 (Apgar Street) would be turned back to the City. A formal agreement between the two entities was never executed because the timing of the construction was not determined. Scott County had already prepared the plans for paving Apgar Street prior to 1991. Due to budget reasons, this project has not been advanced by the County. The County Highway Engineer has contacted staff indicating that due to increasing dust complaints and also other project delay, the County would like to construct Apgar Street yet this year. The County Engineer feels that Fuller Street should also be built at this same time in order to adequately make the Apgar Street connection. The County is requesting that the City design Fuller Street. With the Council decision to move forward on the Community Center, staff also feels that the timing on constructing Fuller Street is also important. Given those factors, staff would like Council permission to design Fuller Street. The actual construction could be done under a single contract, with the County probably being the lead agency, and the City participating in our share of the costs. Because of the urgency in this project and due to staff workloads, staff feels that one of the City's outside consultants should design Fuller Street in order to get it done quickly and out for bids. Staff has contacted Strgar-Roscoe Fausch (SRF), who has done a lot of design work for Scott County and is also one of the City's consultants, to determine the cost to design this 1 project. Without a firm scope of services, SRF has indicated the design fees would be in the range of 8% - 10% of the construction costs. The County has estimated that Fuller Street would cost approximately $500,000.00, which would make the design fees around $50,000.00. Staff can obtain a firm proposal from SRF for the July 5, 1994 Council meeting. All design fees would be included in the total cost participation between the City, County and possibly assessments. Staff has been contacted by the developer of this land, Novak-Fleck, who is starting to lay out streets for a new subdivision in this area. Therefore, the timing of constructing Fuller Street would also benefit the developer. A public hearing has never been held to consider the proposed assessments for either Apgar Street or Fuller Street. If this project is constructed by the County and the City participates in the costs, the public hearing must be held prior to the County awarding the project as opposed to prior to ordering the plans if it were a City project. Staff is attempting to get a legal interpretation of this concept prior to the June 21, 1994 Council meeting. Approximately one year ago the County Highway Engineer prepared a draft Memorandum of Understanding covering the design, construction and funding for both Apgar Street and Fuller Street. Staff requested several changes and the Memorandum of Understanding has not yet been revised. Staff is requesting that the County Engineer submit the final Memorandum of Understanding to Council for consideration at the earliest convenience. Once all of the design is completed and a construction estimate is prepared, a formal Cooperative Agreement covering the City's share of the cost will be prepared and the City could then conduct the public hearing on all improvements. Staff would also like to suggest that the site grading for the Community Center could also be done at this same time. It would be appropriate for SRF to prepare a grading plan to include in the plans for bidding with the street construction. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Direct staff to obtain a proposal from SRF to design Fuller Street and bring back on July 5, 1994. 2. Direct staff to design this project in-house (would delay project until next year). 3. Direct staff to notify the County that they should design Fuller Street. 4. Do Nothing. 2 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. The County has indicated that they would not be able to design this project and would like the City to do it. Since the County designed the City street portion (Apgar Street) they are requesting that the City design the County road portion. ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Move to direct staff to obtain a formal proposal from Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch,Inc. to design the Fuller Street realignment south of 10th Avenue. 2. Move to direct staff to request a Memorandum of Understanding on the project from Scott County for City Council review. DEH/pmp FULLER 3 --....--'''• ,.. ,----1 :. A.............. ..._,--... ., . 'l •-•'",.......:...... iij •••-•. ---'''''. — A-W - ---...' I--- ... ......- t; --; --r% %.------- •••••"-----.-1. . :_.i. TWir::,... ••••-" ...1.701...----.-- -'-•••....--•••••.‹-----..----: . ^ f•-•a-, '._. --- _L.-- ------ •.., I. •••••• - ..... 1"...""......, • • 4,1 , "'S.., ,..,....: .. .. , ji,,, • ' V 0..... ...... e...- 7 .'; ..: FIGL RE 5C - t• 1 _ ... ., ......_ ......... . _I ., , Am,. ......---;,- i • ': ..... ....,-....... ....... . .............77........-- 1 ,....,......z...' •_,.. .7........"..................., . ......... .". ., . ‘ VeZ\ I ,1 1....,11 ••••• ................- • -. ... ...-----• . • ' , • %........•••••• .......-...•••••••• 1 .1.....„-_:-..-------4, V-1--101.. \.,,r------. _..........•••••, . . ••i ...........josicv:#3--e..--r..--- .,,..—..-7.1 i.-,-..,--".••••...... .,. • .. -, . Ift• • I sot . .." I • ;..3 & , ,Aag.,--'' (--,.i.T., ‘ V.. .6:,-- • 6: a 4.1 - ,.------, i.. , i t.,: ----, . ...:...--I. ,... , , ,,.„.-i it........:,.... ....----- , t. ---1 1 . „--.--.7.. • ...,..r ‘ ,_.....,-. • i . ..,...,.-7,- a_21....- 4 \ ;,,,o,:. I ' , ,.....-, 916 , , .•••••••.•7=7 ____,, ll' ,.....' ___i___: "4 .---_........"9 r-...-7-7-7 •• ••• ' , .!... ; \L„.........; ,•:-. _., ,--.-77, • ; .. - • -- 1 ----- , — .1 t.....&*.I : \ _of--; , •---- -;. ‘.... ..0 • • 1. ' - .. . ‘• 1..-1--,aame- I 1•""4-*.- 1 ftirtrzt •-. 1.,,,,-.,.., '. , t• : . ' I , , . i • . i t''''‘'4"! ' : • ' • i . • : ‘ . . -ft. . .0, r•--- : i t ' v T.-1 ' ‘ .. ', ; ‘ . .,. ., . , ..i , , :1 , • : •. • ! ••• I * J i we!J i' • ' 1 .. ‘ • . ....--r--71 1 • , t .‘ i .. -,‘,1 . ' . •I _v. • . • i 1::....;,1 ....!--r-."--•, ;,_::.1 -.-.t--:. .-.:"-1 1% ' 1 1..4"."... . . t .* ' ' t 1 .. - 1 1 . t,..••••"'"— •••••••••:•-..--1 t—.--.-.— •1 V: =:-I 7--" k. ..,*•^1 ''''''-''' 1 1 1 I...AIL...0i 'itgt- '.7.• "• ' r.,,--. fl",777,71 ?0.,:: i.,, i.i 11.. I.: : , - 1 _ --7-1 :.,...,„_.,1 % ••••- • 7.....77-7, , 1 •: , . i 1 ,.., , . • • 1 wine- . .. .,..„ Vti .1., 1: 1 i I i I . tifiLL .i !wt.' if ; L....L.1-.1 ,,_,...r.---7- . , ri••-ri ......:_•,..;3 1.---- . ' ' V''''''.4k . ' ' ' 1 • ___ - , ., , I , • • . •• , I a k • ; ..‘ LHI 11 ......----; .....,-,..-71 r 1;•.ris.....*iiiso4 , 1 .... 1 L:.„.1.1-"' _,....t....., tr.-7771 •. - ;•A. t 'Ard. .. ..:-...%; 1.:2.11:...:4 iF.i , % ‘ .1 t I -.....3171 ,..,...e.....r1 1;": ..-.. ••', 1_;,....jr t '‘ '..`7 " vti... - *. . ' vi.-11- -1 : "--, L.112,-1-'''' -,T----e-ra •,••. )i 1. t" -At• 1 1 I'' tog t • . ...1.41.1im•-i . 1 ;,----41 . . 1 i ‘ ,k' .--- .., , V..„1 ---1, 4111111111.3 • . t ., ' I hz.....:....:.1 L.__4: „ 1.-.--;!--......., r...,------ 4 t 4 .. ‘. '"'"---,----1 r-1:-.4-1 1....."-iLa •-1 ' -i""".._...i ' ' . . it•. 1 ..., li 717:7 .r::::.... ...---, 4_1 1 .---; , L.:,... , Mao ! • • I ,,,,E 1 r--.7.1 , • . .--7-7-.--, Fr:— , - - •_-.,....__ , : ' lia4 P-77770 lir 717 - • Tt- i t I - '8-321 1-.1;—.0 r:-..-. i'''''"P"... -"-"--1•1. ' •-1 • :,.._si f---4.-..n I. I. r, ___...., . . ..., ,.,...i . L3......... .,, ,,,,. .C.••(9., 1, ..- ! r--7•",,,'• 'r'1.. : .-a -4— .....i..- . ... ... }--- .e.-.. !:..-I • .-- ' .--..,- ,, :,- ..,- 4.2.: 1'4= :: r-C-Li rt-----) t-r------1!---1 :7-4- — 1--rT1 r•-". ' '—'2-•....._:- . --7.1 `.,•74.3. :, t-z7.:-,f• r-.---Fz,. 1 ,i r"-r-' L ..i._...,. 7 I. .• •m ,; , : • , 3 • I L.= r•- 1 1." r;.1 r-.7.177. 1" 77 i 1:-2:'• ‘f 1 . • • ''! ' , r .d: 1 L-_.....:_ui - 1 - i • ____u- -÷--- -r-- „ L , It••03, mi. , _ , a aa•azt •: 6 -:-.-: :.1r -1 1 . ..--1 r--I4--1 1----tr ....., i, .-- P:::::—..! r _,;--, I--., if.t• ', ; r.....7.z . ,;_:_i t•--±;-1 r.-7-. r-: , .,---- .. h-1:174 tr---.... !,.,,,__ I-- ...... ii ..... )--.4 • - r— ......, ... i--1. ' ' i I" ' " . . i' 41•IMS VII l'IT S he......,..._ i itI CI" Cf m. • : --r " "''....57: • i ; 1 i N.m..........mm••••4 I : ;•• ' I i . r ; : 1 1 i ), . : : : ! .t, •••,,/ . , I r!vcriAlp Ave. ;„..ri ! • 1.%1 ...--‘ , i,../....\-?,,,c,Ir•rFsp•r., st .• I i..: 1.'T.4.- ÷ I . •,:s.VP.. % • .. 9..47.-9 I, i - ; .1 ! ,_i 1.1 • ......:, i: , 1.".:.÷.1.. , .AfirN4ES ,JVF.• ' i ;''''..., : . 7"...)-•C,•" 'e.: 1.. .-. ...7.7."..-1 ' I 1. Ak • I.! • : I r..---1-:. ILI ILI .-..,I • j : t, 't i; ...:_mi.L—.Z.: "I • ; ! !, -.:1 I ## : ;---. • , OA =WI et WI . • M 11:311 i . . .-- .S ii ;4.,.. .. Alo,-------_____________AG . . • Q a '"•,,,, I PM ,•••r I 1 , , ..41401pi 43 ,... .p II • 3.3 >•.9• 1 —I. . • : . 1 N.%.L•• II 1I 'dommi t ! i 1 S ....„1 ki ... .....0 ------ ---- - - • --------- -. .1', i 1 : ,10 ,..., a 7. 1 1 -- --- r---.---.-------; . ................. . . • ....-A-T-7-72; . :NJ ., . • . . ,..„ . • 1! 1 .... - - - , • 1 g; t ; _ .... - , _ - - , 1 t ' ..... ...__ - 1 i 1 --.... .. ' 1 • 1 - - - .. .... .,_ ... - ... .. . . . .. --• -- --------.........._ : '""' ". I I ..'-"i 10.7i,r^Ir-27-0 NORTH-SOUTH COT ,T ECTOR OPTION C FULLER STREET A_LIGNIVIFINT CONSENT iy MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Renewal of On Sale Wine Licenses DATE: June 17, 1994 INTRODUCTION Stonebrooke of Shakopee Inc. and Cedar Fair L.P. have applied for 1994-95 On Sale Wine Licenses . The applications from Stonebrooke of Shakopee Inc. and Cedar Fair L.P. are in order. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the applications and grant On Sale Wine Licenses to Stonebrooke of Shakopee Inc . , 2693 County Road 79 and Cedar Fair L. P. , One Valleyfair Drive. JSC/trw - CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Renewal of Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor Licenses DATE: June 17, 1994 INTRODUCTION The following businesses have applied for a 1994-95 On and/or Off Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License. Staff has checked for delinquent property taxes and utility bills . The Building Inspector has advised me that all premises are in conformance with the City Code. All of the applications are in order for Council consideration, except those that indicate "table" . These should be tabled if they are not in order by Tuesday. I will place an update memo on the table . ACTION REQUESTED Approve the application(s) and grant an On Sale and/or Off Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License to: Approve/ Table Applicant On Sale Off Sale Approve Superamerica Group - Division of Ashland Oil, Inc . X 1155 East 1st Avenue Approve Cedar Fair L.P. X One Valleyfair Drive Approve Holiday Stationstores, Inc. X 444 East 1st Avenue Approve Pizza Huts of the Northwest, Inc . X 257 Marschall Road Approve Retail Foods of Minnesota, X a division of Gateway Foods, Inc. dba Brooks Food Market #28 615 Marschall Road Approve Raceway Park Inc. X One Checkered Flag Blvd. Table Shakopee Ballroom & X Banquet Center, Inc. 2400 East 4th Avenue Approve/ Table Applicant On Sale Off Sale Approve Polka Dot Dairy, Inc. Tom Thumb Food Markets X 590 So. Marschall Road Approve Fraternal Order of Eagles X Aerie #4120 220 West 2nd Avenue Approve Retail Foods of Minnesota, X a division of Gateway Foods, Inc. dba Brooks Food Market #42 1147 Canterbury Road Approve Sene' s Inc. X dba Imperial Wok 237 East 1st Avenue Approve Stonebrooke of Shakopee, Inc. X 2693 County Road 79 JSC/trw CONSENT / 311_ MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Renewal of Intoxicating Liquor Licenses DATE: June 17, 1994 Introduction The following applicants have applied for 1994-95 Liquor License (s) . Staff has checked for delinquent property taxes and utility bills . The building inspector has advised me that all premises are in conformance with the City Code. The following applications noted "approved" are in order for Council consideration. Those that are marked "table" are not in order and should be tabled if they are not in order by Tuesday. I will report on Tuesday. Recommended Action Approve the application(s) and grant an Off Sale, On Sale, Sunday, and/or Club Intoxicating Liquor License (s) to: Action Applicant On Sale Sunday Off Sale Club Approve Bretbecca, Inc . X X X (dba Pullman Club) 124 West 1st Avenue Approve Rock Spring Restaurant, Inc.X X X 1561 E. 1st Avenue Approve Clair' s Bar, Inc. X X X (dba Jerry' s Bar) 124 South Holmes Approve Canterbury Park Concessions, Inc. X X X 1100 Canterbury Road Approve Dangerfield' s Restaurant X X Inc. 1583 E. 1st Avenue Table Springers on Main, Inc . X X 911 East 1st Avenue On Sale Sunday Off Sale Club Approve MIN Hotel Corp. X X (dba Canterbury Inn) 1244 Canterbury Road Approve Turtle' s Bar and Grill X X Inc. 132 East First Avenue Approve Corp - Tool, Inc. X X (Arnie' s Friendly Folks Club) 122 East First Avenue Approve Pablo' s Mexican Restaurant X Inc. 230 South Lewis Street Approve Family Dining Inc. X 6268 Hwy 101 Approve Riverside Liquors, Inc. X 507 E. 1st Avenue Approve Valley Liquor, Inc. X 1104 Minn. Valley Mall Approve Spirits of Shakopee, Inc . X 471 Marschall Road Approve The American Legion X X Club Post No. 2 1266 East 1st Avenue Approve Knights of Columbus Home X X Assn. , Inc . 1760 East 4th Avenue Table VFW Post #4046, Inc. X X 1201 East Third Avenue JSC/trw 13 1 CONSENT Attached is a print out showing the division budget status for 1994 based on data entered as of 6/16/94 . The HRA Fur::, is experiencing costs that will probably exceed the budget as it currently stands. Costs are related to the Stans House project and TIF studies. 6/16/94 CITY OF SaAKOPEE E'=ENSES BY CEPARTMENT CURRENT YEAR =4NUAL MONTH TO PERCE'' DEPT DEPT NAME 3.;OGET ACTUAL DATE EXPE%:ED 00 N/A 0 0 -36= 0 11 MAYOR 8 COUNCIL 69,140 503 20,355 29 12 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 185,140 10,382 82,6:1 45 13 CITY CLERK 116,490 8,488 47,366 41 15 FINANCE 278,020 13,738 104,2'8 37 16 LEGAL COUNSEL 179,880 8,273 59,759 33 17 PLANNING 405,860 22,522 143,16' 35 18 GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUIL2!NGS 114,460 7,486 49,960 44 31 POLICE 1,376,440 88,242 627,6.0 46 32 FIRE 865,310 497,366 592,111 68 33 INSPECTION•BLDG•PLMBG•NTG 183,350 11,009 68,772 38 41 ENGINEERING 346,590 22,236 145,985 42 42 STREET MAINTENANCE 585,050 17,620 174,776 30 44 SHOP 104,530 69,258 108,641 104 46 PARK MAINTENANCE 307,270 21,342 140,498 46 48 REFUSE COLLECTION 513,550 39,120 201,989 39 61 POOL 150,300 6,182 19,691 13 64 RECREATION 200,010 11,413 77,835 39 91 UNALLOCATED 143,960 130 29,419 20 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 6,125,330 856,210 2,694,373 44 17 PLANNING 360,860 300 114,591 32 TOTAL TRANSIT 360,860 300 114,591 32 12 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 64,870 14,818 61,149 94 TOTAL HRA 64,870 14,818 61,149 94 00 N/A 704,250 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPITAL EQUIP REVOLVING FUND 704,250 0 0 0 .4 1 x Cd D: 04 x a s L a a a w O. < ' E4 E. E. E. E• H 1--! r-! H 0.-1 H H I.-1 F--1 ' 1 Cl 0 Z 00 a E z 0 a w 0 H N M 4' NT v1 O .-1 N C'1 O ‘n v1 v1 v1 v1 co co co q D .-1 .-1 .-1 .--1 .4 C' CT 0' GI Z o O O 0 0 N N 0 N 0 e'1 on on 0 0 H O O 0 O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N O N O N N N O O 4t O O v1 0 O . c'1 O C'1 N on .-1 CI .--1 0 e'1 .-1 00 C'1 .-4 r• r• v1 00 r• r• N CO CO N E• 0 0 en N M e4 .-1 v1 r-1 o-i .d .-1 .-1 .-1 e") Z .-I .-4 NT C'1 .7 N N .7 N N N N N N .7 0 .-1 0 .--1 0 .--1 N N -i N N N N N N .-1 o O v1 e-1 .--1 v1 .•d .-1 N .-i e-1 .-1 .d .-4 .-1 C'1 O 0 c0 N N .--i 0' 0' e"f 0' 0' 0' ON 0' 0` .. < O` 0' O O' O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .a a = w m < a < >- m P. z < < < O a ›. a H < E• m a w L4 x x H W 4 • < W o 0.1 IU-1 E., Z H 02 GO < A Z H A < A P. X 0 04 Z C 0 en 0 a \ a 1 W \ a I 0' < E. U D N Z FA CD U E. N VD C/) H H 0' v1 < H H LA 0 0 Ls. Lt. 0) N 0 Li. Cr. N 0 a. P' a 0 0 Cr.) aa.. a ' a oW.. W O 00 0 00 Cn 0 x .a x x Z z0 0 z v� cxn 0 vxicn F x v1 - ac 00 4 5 x 4 h w Li) •• a Z Z " " ¢ e Z .4 e a Cl) N 0 , 01E. E.UA U4 CO cD A co co 0 •• Z DC W Cn cn W W W W W E. co W O E. < < E. E. E. E. E. 0 Cn 0 > > w 3 3 w w w < w w a CD D O O D D D a' 0 D D a: E. O 0' W' 04 < 0' 0' O' < O' 0' F. • - W cdE•+ E. O 04 04 c4 w a a' W 0 Cn 0 0 X X CCD Z Z g a g g a CCn .a .-1 E. O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-1 V0 N 0 0 N N r• N 00 r• v1 N N r• N 0 0 Z O O O O 0 0 O 0 0 .-1 01 .T 01 C'1 .-1 e-1 VD 4) .a N 0' v1 v1 VD VD O O ✓• O O O O O 0m VD v1 v1 v1 N N 0\ O O O' 0` C'1 C'1 r• .--0 00 .-d .-I v1 v1 O O ti X O O O O O 0+ 0 .4 .-+ VD 01 O' a' a' .7 .7 .4 .4 7 0 - - •4T .-1 .a O 0 .-1 .-1 O 0 O' N N .7 .T VD N 00 CO 00 M Cl v1 v1 N .T .-1 ON O' N N 0 O wd V} Cr} - N - - - V} V} V} V> VY • - V} C/} V} N - - - • 0> V} - 7.1 x 0 0 'D O N C'1 C'1 O .-1 N .-1 .-1 N N Lx. 0 v1 v1 4) .•-1 r` C' O• .a r1 N .-1 .-1 Cl)' V} Lq '.D ' V} V} V} 7 .7 VY V} V} V> V} x 0 ti Ch CL 0 N N W v} 01- E' }E+ Cn W Cn CO OD 00 '.0 0 0 0 0 v1 v1 v1 v1 v1 v1 H E-1 0 0 0 0 .-1 .-4 .-1 .-1 .-i .-r .--i .-i .d .•1 .-1 0 < \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ . \ \ \ W A '.D '.0 4) 'D VD VD 4) VD • 40 4D .D VD '.0 '.D v0 04 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pd \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ Pd 0 .7 NT Nt .7 NT NT Nt NT - NT a NT NT a NT 0 Lx) 0` 0' 0m 0' O' 0` a' O' 0\ 0` cm 0' 0+ a' O+ Cr) x Om a' a' Cr" O. 0` a' OT O' 0' OT Om 0` 0' 0' S 0 .-1 .-1 .-1 4 .4 ....1 .-1 .4 .-1 .A .-1 e4 .-1 .-1 .-1 0 0 ►a Z N CD Cr" 0 vl vo r• e-• N C'1 .7 v1 FA .T .T .7 v> 0' 0` C' 0 0 0 0 O O x a .7 - .7 w co co 0' 0' 0' 0. 0' Z 0 O 0 0 0 v1 v1 v1 vl ill v1 v1 Ul W -7 .7 - .7 T - .7 s .7 .T - o x o O o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CP w a a = < H H H O O O C O O C O C O C 0 0 0 0 N Z CU < CIO x C) C. • X O Z 0 C. W C.) H .7 00000000 .- n cn .7 u1 O N n n n n n n n n n c1 n c1 n in n 7 O. N N N N N N N :V N C1 O 4- N N N Z 0 C1 C'7 N CV N N N N CV N N N ` O N N N H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .O v 0 O 0 O N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N a. 0 0 O O co 00 0 Hi .- -- 0 Hi H -i 0 0 0 0 0 O. 0 CT n n c1 N CV N C'l N N N Hi .--i .7 HI C1 N M E-' M .--i .-r .7 M Cl C.. ` Cl C^. '^ CV N N c1 N N un Z .7 N N '^ + - .7 .: .� v .7 .: .� v Cl .7 p I i I I . i I i I 0 .Hi N N .-i .--i Hi .-i -i ri .- .-i .-r Hi .7 .-i .-i Cl U M .-i Hi C1 c'l .O n n ul .- ti .-i -4 cn N CO 0 .-i U .-i 0' O. .-i Cfl Hi .. .-i .-r c^. - •O .O c") .O .-i 0 .O < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .O 0 O. .O H Z 0 H a L W z 'JH C4 Z 0 .H-7 .H7 H W CW.. H x a s Z cn H E-+ 0 Cr) VI C. C. H Z cn O. N O A O O d ..a H VI Cl) H \ 0 0 VI Cn X < W Er W W Z Z Z C) 0 ZZ¢ W W L• Z W L-' 's` 0 0 E-' 0 H CO C:: W CO .7 O O O .I O 0 o H H L-1 Cl) 0 Cl) W 0 C.' 0 .-a x "" _ .-7 W - E. H Z Cl) H CO 7 W a. CO C. C. C. W P-. CL o.. C. W A O O .7 (.) W W W1 U W 4.1 :4 g g H Lit .-a 0 C4 Z .-i .7 C/) .a a .1 Cn .4 1 .1 )-i W W 0 0 H Cl) C. 0 Cl C1 H W W L:1 H W W ::7 C. C. 0' Cy. A H X C.) N N Z E-+ E-+ E- Z E-+ E-4 E. 0 0 W C1 0 Z H .7 0 Z Z 0 0 < Z Cy. H 0 0 CNA C/)VI C.4 H EEE 0 Z O U << 0 0 C) H 0 d 0 d 4 0 W C.) N H ul D P4 El a C.) .-1 W 0 0 C4 H A Z W A .o 0 0 Z i1 -i LL. w 0 0 El 0 0 E N A ›. C4 C' W W x CA C4 Cn Z E-' d < H H 0 W x CO Z CO L.1 H W W x x E. H C.) 0 0 > N .a .4 E i E-' - E l El E-+ El E'• a WZ C) W C.) U 00000040 CL.. 0...= d W X 3d Z rn ZV> cnFEyEiE' E� E' E� H AA ; a aa z a. D O 5 d d << d << < < d < d 4 d H n is r is iC is . * is is is .--r El 00 .-+ .-+ 00 0) HIs.0NN .-I '0C4 Cn C1 - n 00 00 00 00 VD VD Z 0 0 d .7 n n n c1 'O N N OT '.O ••:: N N n O' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N a 0 ul u1 O. O. .O .O Cl)- N Hi 0 .-i to 0 J 0 CO .O .7 ul LA .-i e-4 0 0 u1 VI .-1 .-i 1 X N N 0) 0) 0 0 .-1 -4 -i u1 .i 0 .-i Cl ul .O .0 n n C1 C1 N N .4 .-i < .-i .-r n n u1 u1 v} C!} Cl)- C0. (> .--1 N Cr, N V} CA .O .O n n Cl)- Cl)- N N ..r CI> CO- - . V} to N C/} N V}t/} to N ).+ x ul 1n 0 0 Cr.. C.) t/} V} N N W en-N C4 V W Ei Cl) W Lel in Ln .o .O .o .O .O .O .0 .O .O .O .O .O .O .0 .a H Ey .-1 -4 .-1 .-4 .--1 .-i .-i .-1 .A r: -4 H .-i H H .-i .-4 .-1 CD < \ \ \ \\\\\\\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ W A .O .O .O .O .O .O .0 .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O %.o- I:4 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ \ \ \\\\\\\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ 0 .7 .7 7 t .7 .7 . t 7 .7 Y - .7 .7 7 .7 .7 .7 0 W a. O• a. O. O. CT O. O. ON C` ON a. O. ON O. O. a` ON W = a. O. O. O. a. a% O. a. O. a• O• O• O. O. O• O. a. O. x 0 .-i .-i .i .-1 H .d .-1 41 .-r .. ..4 .-i .-i .--i ri .--1 .-i r .1 C) 0 .a Z .O n CO N c1 .7 ul .D n co H 0 0 0 .-a .-d -r .--1 --. -1 .-1 C) C• C` ON a. O. O. O. C` a. O. Z C) ul It. in In to Ln al u'1 ul ul Ls: .: .7 .7 d .7 d .7 v 4- 0 - O 0 O O 0 0 0 O O 0 , < O 650000006 O O O C O 0 O O O C c1 z 00 Z co a •E z 0 Pk w 0 H .o N N. N N N r-- N. r-- r-- co CO CO co co C` 0 .-I N 0 r• N r- N r• r-- N N N N N N N N N N co co co co co > N N ti N N N N N N N N N N N N CN N N N ti C\ Z N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Com: N H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r. in 0 0 0 0 C. C': C7 C"') Cl Cn CI el C"1 C7 .7 - - .-1 N H H H .: C+ E-1 .^l N N N N N N N N N N N N N CV - N N vi =.: cl Z .7 - .; .7 .7 .: .7 - .7 .7 - - .: - C7 - - - D I i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i O H N C'1 .7 CO H H H H .- H H .0 N H 0 r• H H H C) H CO CO CO N CO N CO H N .7 N N Cl .7 N N N .7 •7 C\ U H H .-i H .0 H .7 H C") C) .7 C"1 4- N - co 4- H .o - •• < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 I- ZZZ Z L] W > z Z 0 w w w w H to H x O 0 0 EEEEa w .-a w 0 H x E E E E E EEE E Z Z Z Z a H a to Z E U ZZZZZZZZZ H H H H a E P. H 0 x w 0ZZZZZZZZ ZZZZ � H Z L 0 0 E EEE 0 E N 0 0 E 0 N Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZZZZZ 0 a Z H Z Z W W ZZZZZZZZZ W W W W H < < H N L w A cd H H H H H H H H H Z Z Z Z E H E N Z w L` CaAAAAAAA aaaa � '" c4 g w a c:.' a. .. ►aaa .a .a .aa .a HHRH E W w H w Z H H H H H H H H H O D D A W A E W 0 O Z o D D D D D D D D D 0' 0• o• 0• a 0 a x 0' 0 U m co paca as w w w W W W W O >+ g 0 a W 0 000000000 ZZZZZZZZZ >i >+ >i >' >4 H H H H H H H H H na ►a ra n4 r1 a a a as to a x c4 a x x a a a a a a a a E H E E E E E E E E E O DOD O Z 0 x Z in Z ZZZZZZZZZ cn N CI) to CA >' U < 0 .--1 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 7 Cr cd Z 000000000 r.7 .a .a r7 w H 0 N A o -- x x x x x x x g g g g gZ ' U Z Z W U '60000000 E E E E E U O co W E w w W W W W W W w ZZZZZ CI) 0 0 > ZZZZZZZZZ U H HZ UUUU c i Z C!1 V! \ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 Z to x 0 Z o 0000 0 0 0 00000 Z E W Gs. w 0 - to V: V1 to to to to to CO VI E E E E E x ax w ai+ >i H CT to N cn cn to to N to N rn D D D O O < < w H 0 O. < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Cl pa PP a0 C7 p H N X H E 0 0 O r� -7 0 •O r• .7 N .7 C. H N CT .7 N CO 0 0 0 0 in in N N N N 0 Z0 0 .--i .o C'7 1.O .o .o cn .o C• cn N .7 co N c0 in 0 0 0 0 N N .0 .o CO c0 0 O• 0 in in .f: Cl N N .7 M N C1 N H O C' H C7 N H M cn to in C• O% .o .O CT as in h N N O .T co c0 r` - 03 .7 CO .o H V} N N H t` -7 .7 H H VY c 0 0 N N C' CO. C? .7 O. V> N H C/} V} C/} V} N cn N V} CO. Cl V} C/} V}V} .O .0 H H V} w-r C/} V} V} - CO- C/} V} CO. Cn•4/1- /-1 }/-+ x H LL. U <11- w x Cd c) w E COW .O '0 '0 '0 '0 %0 '0 .O •o .o .0 .O .O .o .o .o .O .O .O •o .o H E H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H U < \ \\\\\\\--\ \\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ - W A .O .O .O •o .O .o .O .O .0 .O .O .O .O •O .O •o .O .o .O •o •O a' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ \\\\\\\\\ \\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ SG U .7 .Er - .7 . .7 -7 - • .7 v .7 -7 .7 - .7 .7 - .7 - v U W CT C• C` C• O• 0% C. O. CT O• ON ON C` ON ON ON O. O• C\ ON ON W x ON ON ON ON ON O• ON O• ON O. CT ON ON O. ON 0% 0% O• O• O• CT x 0 H .: H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 0 0 rl Z O• 0 H N Cl d in •o H H N N N N N N N U .SG CT as O. C• as C• O• CT Z U in in in in in in In in O W .7 d -. - -. .7 - .7 00 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 .a x = - -- - _ = - < 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 D o c 0 0 0 0 z C,),0 00 a. •X z 0 a. w 0 H ill H .O .O O. CO N N r` 0 a0 CO O. 0 CO 0 CO c0 0 CO a, c000O u1 00 00 O N N c1 N N N N '0 N N N cl N N N Z H N .0 N N :el H -4 N N C's. N N N N H CO 0 .: 0 0 N. to .-, 0 0 0 O. 0 0 0 O. 0 en 0 0 0 .O 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 * O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 to .-1 to .; - .7 .--i H c1 c l M H ON ON .-i E• N to N N N N N N N N co,. N c7 c1 N Z N .7 v .7 . .7 .4- . .7 007 v .7 .." .7 I I . I I . . I I t I 0 0 H H H H H N c1 H .7 CO H H .-i I,- C.) .7 H .7 .O to N H H CO CO .- N CT H N o CA cn - H H .7 M Cl H H C-, eh H H 47 a' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c4 c4 a Z ¢ < y; C6 CA Cn N E. Z CO C.::. W. H H H H 0 0 HH d Z ZZ a aa.. a E, E• E- a = Cr` E.O.. a. H H H a. a. z z z 0. 0 H W V: N NC4 0 W L:. 0 a'. H E-• E• E-• 0 0 0 0 0 0 N cO Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 000 Z ZZ .-a W g W W W G:; H H H Z Z Z H W CI: 6 A 0 X X Z Z F E-, H H H H E-• ab Cr H a H H a. H a s g w w w • H H H H 0 O a a 0 Cc: W W H H H W Z Z H 0' 0' 0* 0' a. a. a Dao a. 0 0 0 W W W W 0 0 0 W c0 A 0 0 C) c0 VI CO 0 W aa4 H - 0 0 0 W W 0 in al X H E F H oo a H 0 O 0 0 0 W co .D 0 E 0 0 0 Q N4 x N A 7 +Y 6 A A A Cn ar 0. ,.a 0 D d CO rx.1 04 E+ 0 0 0 Cn CO 00 A O O H C4 0 HH a. ..7 Y W � � W H a EU, a. a. H Z co co a: O 0 a% ¢ < 00 W x = = = .-7 00 0 O. 0 C� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H n -X * . * .0 -X * . .0 x . H E+ 0 00 en eh a% O. Ncl0 O0 nn In u1 tri et/ cl0 co co 000 c0 c0 Z • O D N N .7 In CO 0 0 . .D to to .O cfl 0 0 0 .O . CO C0 CO c0 0 0 0 CM c1 0 00 0 In O O N N O O .O co to O O N N .7 - H .7 en O. N N Ui u1 0 N N t"1 Z N In in .D .D O. O. to N Co N N N N to 1,1 NO V>M.NO N N N N In V) .D cr. - 4' 0 O .O .0 Cl} Ch Cl> C9 ch VY en. VY en. V} C? .O .O N N Ll N N '•l V} V} - - V> CO. V} N CA 0> t?VS Cl> i4 aG N N x. 0 a). co- al = Y 0 W E, N W .D .O .O .O .O .O .O .D .O .O .O .O .O .O .O H E-4 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H C9 d \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\\ \ \\ \ W A .D .O .D .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .0 .O .O .O .O ai 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\\ \ \\ \ V 7 a .7 .7 - .7 - - .7 � -4 s 0 W a% a O. rn C. C. a. Cr, Cr, Cr, C' ON ON Cr, Cr, W x Cr, Cr, Cr, Cr, Cr, Cr, eT Cr, rn C. C' C• Cr, Cr, Cr, x 0 H H H H H H H H H H .- H H H H U 0 I-1 Z N CO O. 0 H N - 11 .O CS CO H N N N C1 e'1 M C'l .71 C1 en cn 0 y.. a• ON O. a. C. a, C a, a, a. a. C, Z 0 to to to to to In to 1l to In In a W - .7 .7 .7 .7 .� .7 v 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 x = - = = - 0 0 0 =0 0 0 C .- C o in 0z c g 00 et a x o z 0 a w U CV H .0 O .-4 CV en as .7 M1 i/1 0 vD 0 .D ON ON ON C• CO O. .0 C• W 00 CA H N N CV C-. 4'1 CV in CV C r• N Z M CO N N CV C\ CO N r• N i-- 00 N H ON M 0 0 0 0 .7 0 •0 0 C 0 0 in 0 0 0 0 0 C` 0 M 0 ` 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S .-1 .-•1 H H H .7 ---1 .7 C••: M M E N N CV M CV N N1 N M CV C•: M in Z .7 .7 .7 .7 CV CV - .7 .7 -7 .7 - .7 p I I I I I I I I . I I I 0 .--1 .-1 M CV O 0 -4 .--4 -4 H H CT o V1 .-d co O. .7 .7 r-i .7 N in CO 0• H C.) M .7 H .-1 CO co v .7 H M .-i M d 0 0 0 0 a% C` 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. U W k) 0 W U d Cn cn H ..7 rz' H d H d W Z W W > W b > Z > Z U Z W H H Cd d < = w = w z o E .a .a W >- >- w E W E C: H Z PPcn < < Cn Z cn z r.r. E aE � O. °' .a H a H Z H CA H Cl)N Z U U Z Z �� Z CA Z U E 0 0 0 = = 0 H 0 E D W Cl) Z Z Z H < < H Z H Z U Cl) Z W W H H C) = CO W Cn W Z \ W 0 Z EE pE- Cl) U• . Cl) ZPi W Z 0 W O Ol W 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 H W aw n 0 0 a U U P. a x) E H I:4 O1 yG z H HH 3 Cl) w H 0 Z 0 Cl)cn a • A 0 -0 U Ls) W >+ d L W .-I Z H El E CO E O HH Cl) E 1/40 0 0H • 0 H W Z V) Cl) x ›, •• Z < H cox O 0 c4 z U cL u+ 3 co O r7 A H C4 0 0 > H d < Cn x ... g CA H E 0 0 W H A H Cl) E W W E El E H H E C) d Z PP.. a > H 0 A a W .+ P: 0 o. O O o d W W H 0 0 - H H Z 0. 0 U 0 A 0 0 A 0 0 W w 4. .-i .0 Y H E0 0 rs M i11 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O O O to in .7 .7 N N O 0 0 Z• Z 0 0 N CV r- r- O O CO CO .--I r-I 0 O .--I H CV N un in in U 0 0 0 ✓ 0 0 0 M M r-1 .-•1 v1 in 1/40 1/40 0 0 0 0 .0 .0 %.0 .0 S *4: -7 In SI r-1 I_) Z .7 S O. C• N N .7 .7 CV N C. C. .7 .7 d .7 .0 1/40 .-d .-•1 .7 .7 CT CT .••1 .-I H .--I H V} N CT 01 .--1 .-d CO CO CV N V} CA C/} V} 1/40 1/40 Cl).V} r•i .-1 0 a•I V} (/} V} CO- - - (/}(./} V> V} V} V} V}V} • 1.1 b4 is. t` .-d .--1 -7 Cy U V} V} V} V} InH W V} P4 0 W E Cn W .0 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 .O '0 .0 .0 H E r-I r-1 H r-I H H H r-1 .-4 .-1 H r•1 H 0 < .. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W A .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 P; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ • U - .7 .7 .7 -7 - . .7 -7 .7 .- . -7 U Cy) CT T C. O` O. C' as O• O. 0• C• O• O` W Z 0` C. as C• O. O, 0• 0` C. 0. CT C• 0% 5 C.) H r-1 .--1 H H r-, H H .-•,I H .-1 .-1 U 0 i-) Z C• 0 .--1 CV M d In .O f\ co 0• 0 H M .7 .7 .7 .7 -7 .7 .7 .7 .T d U a4 C• 0` O. 0• Q. Q• 0• 0+ 0• 0• 0. as n /1 .n Z 0 .n .n .n in in . . .n .n .n r a W -7 - 1 d .7 - -7 -7 .7 -7 -.7 .7 0 = 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO U .a = - -•- = a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z 00 r a 5 z 0 O.. Z z 0 0 Cz1 a s C.) 0 0 H N A CO C+ Z Z 0 .-i - M - ul Ca CO CO CO 0 a• G1 as a` 0 0 Com: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ti N cs. N N M "1 ` M M M M M M M Z N N N N M M N N •O N N N N N N N H 0 0 0 0 a1 as 0 0 u1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-1 .-1 0 0 .- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 It 0 0 O 0 M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N ill sr .-d M CO s7 M -1 Cil M H - N N M O N M ;yl to M Com') N O O O O Z M - '7• N M sr s . - -. .. M M M M 0 i . I I . I I . . 1 . 1 1 0 .-1 --1 .-1 .-1 0 .-1 rl .--I .-1 .--1 .-1 n a\ - •O 0 co - - M M M M 0 s - M co M M _n - 0%.-1 M .a .-1 Cd Cr% CA < 0 0 0 0 o1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M M o C.) ::a c(, Z Cs' U < Cl) Cs) A C/) W H L:] \ C/1 z Z H 0 . 1H-1 z Z 0 H 0 H .-] C:) H Z W W W 0 .a H C/) Z a. H H 04 H Cl) H x a El (7.1 H c-. Cl) Z W Cl) C/) U O. H H R H 0- C7 a H 04 C4 H .-1 H CO 0 ZZZZ 1-4 V) V) W Cl) < C/) \ Cl) W W W W 0 H C� 0 OD a < 0 0 H 0 0 0 ZZZZ En Csa U ZH \ 0 0 C) H Z N Z Z xccax \ Cl) W. \ W H 0000 A W ZH .-a 0: c>~ .a Cl) Z .a cx H ZZZZ > 0 0 > 0 H C. GW=. H > g H H R H w 0 w ,-.1 .-1 g cd 0 aZ a Wim. O H W W H C.. Cs) H U 0 H H R H 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 0 n n n n H H 0 * it # UU H < HH H H H R Htn N CA N U '- Cl) CA W W < C A H H R H •a 0 0 N. I:4 H Cs) W 4-4 Cl) .a p A A A A N A Z a s A A 0 E+ 1~-i A 0 0 0 0 0000 CO > 4+ mw 00 ~' 0 z - a Z Z = = H H Com-. Z ZZ Z 0000 Z 0 < 0 0 V1 V) CA N - H Z Z Z W W 0 A Z H < 0 A A A A of < o-.) w cd c4 < w O U ZZZZ as 0 C, 0 0 0 0 x x = H H H1-11--1H .-4 Ns 7• .-C r fin' C -C r •-1 H O cn M u1 u1 O a• a• 0 0 0 n n 0 0 c7 M In u1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 co c0 - 0 in co Co u10 u1 n n 00 •-1 •-1 .-iH 00 NN 0000 >r A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V 0 •-1 N N M M •O 0 0 Cl)- 0 0 •-1 .--I ul u1 CO CO N N ul u1 d .1' ill -. N •O 0-7 .-1 .--i .-i .--1 .i N sr sr M cl to u1 al ON - sr M C1 M M .--i •-1 CO ON M .-i 0 CO- V> •-1 V> .-1 V> Cl)- C? G> V} V} N N ' - V}VY .-1 .--1 M M n .-1 n tel •.1 - Ch V> CO. CO- Cl)- C.O. Cl)- VY Cl)- V} -CO. f.1 - N •O •O Cs. 0 In W .-1 V> M ,--1 = V> O: U Cs) H cn 1-4 E ..-1 - - --1 ..-1 - .-I-I ..-1 •o •0 H •a •a •O • 1 •.1 0 < \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ Cs) A •O •O •O •O •O •O •O •O NO •O •O •O •O •O •O •O C4 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aG \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ 0 ,.I' .T ...1- - •-:t - - - 4' - - -7' - .1^ NI- C..) Cs) a• as C• as a• as ON a\ as ON a• as C• Cl a• O• lx) x as as a• as as a1 os -4r -4- a• O• O1 Os a• S0 U .--1 .-1 _1 - .-1 .--1 .-1 .-4 - .-I • r 4 . .-d •--4•--4H .-1 0 -4 Z - N M - Kl •O n CO C` 0 r. H .Pt to to .!1 .!1 ul in .n .f1 •D •O U S4 a as o• a• C+ rn a• a• c" a• a• Z U u'1 u1 u1 u'1 to Lel ul v1 in Un 0 [LI - - - ,7 - .- - .- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 r` D z 00 to a •z D z 0 a w U . . 1 ,4 .-1 .-4 N M VI CD H co CO 00 .A •O 0 r,.1 -1 -I .-1 .-1 .-1 .-1 N .-1 O O O O O 0 O M M M M M M M CT M !` M M M M M .7 c.1 Z CV N N N N N N 00 N C•: N N N N N .D N H 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Ch co O O O 0 O O co O O O O 0 O O 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 o - 0 # N N N 0 O 0 O O N O O O O O O O O O O O .-1 .--i ./1 .7 .-i N 1'1 M .7 M .4 .--1 C1 E. .1 .--1 .d M M M N M N u1 M N M M N N N Z M M M .7 .7 - . . .7 • r . .7 . .7 .' .7 i i I . 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 O .-1 N M 0 0 .-I .-4 N N .-1 M C.1 .d .1 .4 .-1 H U .. .-i .-1 N ./1 .7 .7 0 .-1 O .7 .-I N C"1 N .4r N U CT CT 0. op CD .A .7 ... M 0 .'1 C1 ..i M M v .O < M M M 0 0 0 0 O O C• O 0 O O 0 O O W W U U 0 W U H H Z < 1-1 CL W d W H co < >> H Z > W O Z 0 > W Z Z ad 04 x c:: D z W Z rL H W 0 W W Cl) E w .-7 cn W E W W .7 E E. vl DP H H 0 U En H C4 Pr H Z F. 1.4 CIL: W W < < D g < Cr < En = N < En Ix Z Z Z Z Z a-. z ..1 m as z U Cz: W W O 0 \ E O W (5 D E D O U E En ad ad H H C7 Z H D Cn Z En H Z Z C, W U U U C!) Cn Z Cs) Cl) Cs. A \W \ Cl) H W Z A Z Z Z En N H X Cl) H ..1 Z ,-7 En E Z H H H H W W E C.. W ad < w A. W W6 0r A W w Z H w O 0.. > H > w w' H .1 tl tl as H ad a 0 o 41 ad g CD ad w 0 1.4 E• EE A. 04 w W. P. Za.. EW E o. O W oa H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w Z N N N N N N a. Cl) H 0 • #• # �k t` n ^ 0 H ACY CZ A A .>-1 H Z E E E E E E w d < >A a H ,/1 c/) Cn c/) V) V) C!) C' 0 A A A A w E r1 H H H H H H 0 Z ZZZZ C/) R+ D Z F • 04 A A A A A A E < < < < d H W VD WZ N VO A CV CD ..a ,-.1 .. .1 .. 7 a . H H.1 EEn EEn EEn EnZ E >A H w • z 000 00 O A a CnCn � Cn A .4 w D CO > � aocx CD 0 < ZZZZ 0 w 0 a 0 0 0 U U U W W w W - z < w 0 En En En En En Cl) 04 En ZZZZ E H Cl) o4 .7 A A A A A A .?S -., W L1 W W 4�c6Y O as Z E cm Z Z Z Z Z Z 0 0 0 0 CSL 0. H H H H H H ') "1 x x x x a�LLL 44 H .-1 E 0000 000 VI VI 00 W 00 O00Ou1M 00 O O 00 .--1 .-C 00 Z0 :D 0 0 0 O O O 0 00 00 N N O O •-1 .-1 O CT N u1 1/1 O O -1 •"1 T. N C0 0 O O 0• M M N al O un 00 00 O CO u'1 un N O 00 .7 UI 0. 0• O 0 00 CO N N O O h Z O 00 .7 .D r- .7 .--I .7 .7 N N N N N N .-1 M CA .4 .-1 .D .D N N 0. O. N N <4 0• .-1 Ui 00 N V> M V> V> 00 00 V> V> V> Cl). co. C!> V> V> CO. .D .o .-1 H rl H VY En. .. - - - - C/} VY V> CO. V> V> CO.V> N 43- ).4 >ld x .d M N M G=. U 0. CI). C/> M1 W V> .-I x En - ad U w E Cn W .A .A .D .A .A .A .A .A .A .D •D .D .D .o .A .A .o H E .-4 .-1 .-1 .-1 ..a .-I .-1 .-1 .a .-1 .4 .-.4 .-d .-1 r1 .-1 .-1 0 < \\\ \\ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ \ \ W A .D .o .D .D .D .o .D .D .o .D .D .o .O .D .0 .D .O PC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x \\\ \\ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ \ \ U W 0• o. v1 O. O. CA 0. c. 0` c• c. O. a1 0. O. CA O. W x 0• 0. 0. 0. 0• O. 0` CT CM Cr, CM 0` O. O. CM CA Ch an U .-+ .-1 .d .a .-1 .-1 .4 .4 .-+ ..a .-1 .4 .4 .-1 .-1 .-1 .-1 U 0 I.-1 Z N M .7 u1 .D N. CO 0. O .-1 N 0 .A .A .o .A •D .A .D .D N N N 0 x o• rn as as as as rn as as as as Z 0 u-1 M1 u, ,/1 r u, u, u, v1 UI al 0• y 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 U ►a z - - x .� = = = = ... a 0 o 0 0 0 0 `0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 z cowb 00 A. • Z 0 A.. C.4 U H `o `0 N CO CO CO CO CO Cs 0 0 0 0 0 H N M 0 ,..1 .-1 .7 M .--i ..I .-1 •H HI .-4 -i 044 N N N 044 N N N > M M N CO M M M M C"1 M M M M M M1 M M M M Z N N .7 .7 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H 0 0 0 tel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 -i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 M M .7 .--i u1 M -+ .•d .--1 .-: u1 N .-: .•-1 .-I .--I .- M .--1 M E N N N in M N N N N M M M M M M v M .1- Z 4' .: N d 0 0 .7 47 - .7 M .7 0 4' .7 .7 v .7 v A 11 I I I i 1 1 i 1 I mil I I 1 0 4' - 0 -1 .-i .-1 .--I .•i .-i .-i H -i N .--1 Hi .-I H .--i .-1 o N N .7 N .7 r• 1.0 -I .7 -I HI .-1 N N N .-1 .--1 .7 N U Vo '.0 CO .-1 'D -1 .-i C% '.0 C% %0 M -I .-I .7 47 7 '.o .7 < 0 0 0s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z a: W W W G. W < .-a W V: V: al Z V) H H H H H H Z Co U L-: W Ls: H cn > > > > > > Z L-1 < Z H H H H z (4 N.. I:4 IYi Qi C cY, O E >+ W .a .a .a .a cn .-1 L' www L-: W H E Z < E a a a C.. H cn cn cn cn N N Ea HH a H 0a00 � Z r: aa .aa a z U ca V) cn cn V: a H ZZZZZ Z 0 E E A 0000 -.'. Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cn C., Z < Z N ZZZZO 4-4 H H H H H H (il Z WIs1 \ H H H H Z 3 VIC/3C/3C/) V2 Cn A H Z U Z r7 E E E E H cn cn cn cn cn cn cn Aa a w < L.' cuwwww w .aH • H > oG � � z .•a CT. wwCs. c:. cn w cn H a 0 A gW W W ::.1 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 W AO' 0' as a s ax 0 G1:404cdC: A cd A /O W U W E 0 0 0 0 a a a a a a a A a A w w A �4 E c,)7' >" 0 A A A CO CO oG fn V) H ..a .a 0 x 00000 .a p .a In a s H C4 C' cx a 0.i a' W Z co -1114 s = a a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 < oG AA 0 E - zzzZz cn a '.0 0 CI, Cn H 0 Cn V1 Cn Cn Cn a". H H H H H rc. Z N A C4 W - A AAA A 0 0 W k. CO Z A A- W Z m CA MI C1 CG >Hj A A 0 0 > .•a pg N - E EEE E 0 0 0 0 0 0 a .4 E ACY] H C4 .a C/3C/3CntiN x 00000 < H a < w H w CLIw c-1 w Z 0 x w x x to E A 3 3 3 3 3 H ZZZZZ CO U A .7 Z Z C.3C/1 0 ZZZZZZ oN .aa s g Z zZZZZ ZH zzzzz x Z E H ••I E N S M 0 0 co CO CO CO -I .-4 0% CO 0 ON 0 0 .7 N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 Z N .7 1� M M 0 0 to u1 CO '.0 0 S 0 0, 0 0 In N N N N .7 0 0 Irl Ln 0 0 0 0 C% 0% N N .--I H N N N N 0 M 0 CO 0% C, N N N N N M 0 0 N N Ul •1 Z N CO 0 u1 in .-4 .--1 N N u1 44-1 N N -I -4 M M co VY VY VY Cr} H N N 01 M N < VY V} .-I C1 M 4' .7 VY V} CA VY .---I V} VY N V} VY VY -1 N VY VY VY VY `.I VY VY VY V> VY VY VY Cl). 1.4 Ls. U W x R4 U W E r.i) W '.o 'D '0 '.0 'o 'o '0 VD Vo '.0 '.0 Vo '0 '.0 w MD 'o '.0 WO H E .-i .-i Hi HI -•1 -I .-1 .-1 .d .-i -i -I Hi .-I 4--1 .-1 .-i -I -I o < \\ \ \ .•• \\\\\ \ \\\\\ \ \ \ W A '.O VD %0 MD .0 '.D '.0 'o VD '0 .D Vo '.0 '.O VD '0 VO VD 'o oG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \\ \ \ \ \\\\\ \ \\\\\ \ \ \ U .7 v .• .7 .7 - .7 .• s .• - .7 .7 v 4' .7 U W Cs as as 0 0 CT CT ON C% 0% CT C% 0% 0% 0% 0" C' a, 0' 14 '"' a, a` C' as a` a% a. a` as O% C% CT 0% 0` ON as O% Oa as = U -I .•4 .--1 .--1 -1 .-i -4 _4 -I -I .-4 .-. -1 .-i -4 H .-1 .-i U 0 .-a Z M s u1 '0 N CO ON 0 4-4 H 1• I's N N N N N CO CO 0 x CT a% 0. ON 0. 0% O. CT Ca Z 0 u1 u1 u1 In u1 In In .'1 U1 0 x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 .a - x x = = = - x x x = _ c c o o < 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 z a� 00 a E z 0 C... W 0N N N H .T .T .T in .o n CO O• C• 0 O N N N J N N N N N N 9-1 C•) Ch C"1 C1 C") •J M VI C1 CO C") C"1 M C`7 C•1 C7 In P1 C•I VI C7 C") Z N N N In N N N N N N C•1 N CV N N N H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 HI 0 0 0 0 0 * N N N 0 In 0 C9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N C1 n - c•1 4' .7 .7 .-1 0 C.. In .i .-4 E N N N N 9--1 N .T N N N N N N C") CV C•1 Z .T .T .T .T N .T .T .T .7 -7 N N N - - .T O I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 0 .-4 .-1 .--1 H N .0 - In r-i In 0 0 ^^ .-1 .-1 .0 U N .-4 N Ca .--I N .0 N .7 N - .T a) ` in N. U .T r .D .-I 0' NT H .o .T .D CO co •-i .T .--1 .--1 < 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 O C• 0' 0 0 0 0 W c xa W Z Z dd a ZClH b co 0 c0 W Cr) W W < Gs. W 9 Z a � •Aj E PG Z Z ZZ -4 m E.. HCl)a H 0 0 0 H a H H H H a < z a s 1a1 cn cn W < <a W z 0 Cl)iA 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Cl) C.) N.z H A a s G. Z A W W W W 0 E z Z H cn H z z X U H H HCl)E c4xcx A Z a a as Cl) 0 E W 000 .) 0 H Cl) H HH • 0 - Z = W EEE H H 0 W 0 D 0 0 a H H W 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0' 0 0' 0' 0' W 0 c>~ a p$ Z Z z co 0 W A W W W U A ca a 0 a U 0 U 0 0 0W H H U Z Z Z ZZ Z W W W 0 N G>:.I W H 0E E E r1 W W W Z 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Cy 0: a4 c4Cn 0 E-4 E-1 0 U H HH .0 0 a x 0 0 x Cl) x x x N 0 t=. Ci, Gt. 0 W U xx 0 cn > aaa Z 000 E E W < < W < 0o W < Cl) W E E E .-a G:7 W W W 0 > a s H4 w X Z Cr) W N W 0 e A A A H I H H H W W W ..7 W < 0 x x ?G X Cl) Cn W N A A A W E 3 co H IX C4 > Cl) Z rn ZZz Z Z Cl) E 00 0 3 o. z Z Z z z Z X z z z o o a a a -1 V .-1 E 0 .7 CO .D CO 0 0 In In c7 cn 0 0 r-1 r•I Ch H CO 0 0 CO 00 N. N. .0 O• In • Z 0 N- e"1 0• 0 O N. r o 0 C . .0 0 0 .7 7 N 01 0 01 e"1 .0 . ) c" D c" 1 0 .D CO ✓ 0 In C") .T .0 In Cn in CO CO C") e"1 0. 0' .O .D C") N CI r•1 .-1 .7 .7 C• 0' H CO .7 .-) X N e"1 (es en- d n N- M en In In H .--I .O .0 N O C• N N .D .O .-i r1 O N C") < VV> Cl)' tn. Cl)'N In In th C/49 .-1 .-4 M C"1 I 9-1 C.A. C") C•) C• C. C"1 Ch 9-1 tn• 1n .9-1 Cl. N N Ch t'> 01. C? • - C Y Cl)- Cl, - 1.1 ?G .-4 r•1 01 C") N W 0 Cl>V> t1"). V> V> W x C; U W E Cl) W •D .0 .D •D .D .o .O .0 .D .O .O .O .D .0 .o .O H E ra .d 9-4 9-1 Hi . 1 .-1 rd 1-1 .-1 9-1 r-1 H ra .-1 H 0 < \\\ \ . \ \ \ " \ \ s., \\\ W A .D .D .D .0 .0 .D .o .0 .0 .D •D .0 .o .D .D .D x 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ��� . , •,,, �� ' ��� U .7s - s .. s -7 -.T 44 -. - .TNTNT O W C' o• o• D. o• O• or o. O• o. 0. o• C' 0. 0% o. W x 0' rn O• rn O• 0' 0• as as O• as 0` as 0. O• CT x 0 r i .-i - .-1 .-1 - .-1 .-1 ra .-1 rd .-i ..1 .•i .•1 .-i 0 0 I-] Z N C) .7 In .0 N. CO O• 0 ra N H a) CO a) a) co 0) co co as as O• U ?L as as C• as a•. CT C• a as CT 0. Z 0 In In In In in In in In In In In 0 Cr.: 7 .T d d .- . . - d .T .7 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < ; x x z z z x = = x x 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 z ) < 00 x 0 a, E z 0 a W 0 • H I N N Cn v .O .O CT CO O• 0 .-a .-1 N M Cn 0 ' Cn Ch cn cn CT ch M .O Cn to - d - - - � > ' Cl cn Cn M O. en M M Cn cn cn Cn Cn cn M Z . N N N N C' N N O• N N N N N N N N H ' 0 0 0 0 v1 0 0 .O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * , 0 0 0 0 0 ,t1 M) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .n .-4 .--1 .� H .--I .-1 '-+ - cn ..-1 .-4 C") Cn .7 i CM CV cn N N N N C.: N N v1 c") C) Lil In N Z .? .7 .7 S. - d v v .7 -. .7 .7 .7 .7 O i I I . I . i I I I I I O 1 H .--I 0 as .--i n n .-. H .-1 .--I .•1 c0 In .-i N U Cn .-1 N N H a N r. - N N .-d as 0 N N C.) . M - .7 'C .O .O .7 .O .7 Cn in n In .0 In .O < • 0 0 CT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .O 0 .0 .O .O 0 W 0 W W 0 Z CA H Cl) Cl) Cl) CA < H H < Z x H as H H H H W '�✓., a4 CZ 0 fn rl W .-a a .-) E W W E H H a Cl) a. a P. a z cn N z a co 0 ..3 O O O 0 H Cl) .7 .a cn N H H O Cn < � Cl) Cl) Cl) E < < E E g 0 \C 7 0 0 0 Cn C/) 0 0 E Z 0 0 Z W E Cn O Z H Z z .-a .a z z Z Z H H Z Z Z W Z H Cl) H H < < H. H W W C/) CJ) Cs) C=) Cs] A H E Cl) EE E H H E ¢E¢ Z > C/) Cn D > Z Z 4. g g c4 cd W W L� Pk H 0 OG Lt W 0 CLQ 0 04 C4 H H W 0 W W E E W W O a 0 0 a a a: a a: a a a a 0• Z a; a: Z Z d a o a 0 o g g 0 0 w H a s H H W 0 z N H .O U Z Z 0 •O H Z H H C/) V) O. 0 0 in E E < C/) aG 0 0 \ H Z N 0 0 H1 Z Z H U 0 < A U E CY., Chi •o 0 C4 OG 0 0 < < �L W 0 C H H N A a s z .-7 < W W 0 3 E W Z Z Z El w mSQL a4 E 0 E U 0 0 Ix a: O > H H X 0 0 .-1 1 Cn .] W 0 H 1.-1 E-. OO C/) N v) E a; C4 0 0 x x x `N N Cao a a: C/) 0 0 H Z Cl) Z H H st O. . 6 < W a' 0 W H '<,,, W W Z U U CT a s a a a a s CZ n: a: CA C) Cn a) cn .a n -X -X * iC iC iC * * * 3C iC H E-. CT n .O 0 0 0 0 .4. .7 CO n 1t) C) M n n 0 0 O. O. Cn N In In to 0 0 Z 0 O` .O 0 0 c0 co N N In 0 .O C1 C) .-1 .--i O 0 CT O. n CT .O O. O. 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 .0 0 .-C 0 0 n n O. O. .n op cn N N n n 0 0 CO CO 0 .-1 N 0 0 0 In P) X CO d CT 0 0 N N .7 .7 Cn .7 CO .d .--1 .-a .~ n n CO CO CO O CO CO CO O N < M CO. 0 N N .--1 .--C .-C H V} VY V} He r-1 Ch C? N N as CT 0 .--I .--I n n In Cn ..0 V} - - • V> VY V. V} CO. V} V} Ch. V} V} CO. f-i Y C1 .-I .-1 .-1 .-.1 Cn C1 w m 44 0 V} <I> V} N N V> VY In In W .-C .-1 N N nG 0 V} V} V}Cr,- W E C/) W •D .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O VO H E .-a .-C .-1 .-a .-C .--1 .-4 .-I .-4 .-1 .-1 .--1 .--i .--1 .--1 .-1 0 < \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ W 0 .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O OG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ - \ \\ \ \\ SG 0 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 J - - - .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 4- 7 0 W CT CT CT CT CT CT O. as CT CT CT CT CT CT O. O. W "" CT CT CT O. O. CT O. CT CT O. O. CT O. O. O. CT x U .-1 .-1 H H1 H .-I H .-1 .+ - H .� H .I .-I .-1 0 O r7 Z t"1 .1. In .O n CO C, C .-4 C\ Cn H O• CT as as as O. a O O O O 0 Y C^ CT O. O• CT CT O+ C o o 0 z U Lr1 ,n .t1 in In V1 :, .0 .O .c .0 O W - .7 .3- ..r .. - 0 ` : o 0 0 0 0 0 o C o 0 0 ..7 = Tx x = x = '^ = = xx '=' x = d o 0 o O C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4 o z °' 00 g. CZ P.4 z 0 z 0 Ili W 0 c� rnrnrn 0 r1 CV S .7 d u1 .D H N CO O .T v d .7 .7 - .. d .T .7 .7 .T u1 to to > C'1 M 01 c'1 C^, tin M C^. .D M C"') 01 01 Ch 07 C') Z CV N N N C` O N CV J N CV CV CN N N N H O O O 0 0 0 0 O in O O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 .-1 O 0 .7 O O O O 0 0 0 It O O O C1 N O C• O O O O O O 0 0 0 ri ri CS C`'1 07 N .T v C'1 M r--1 .T Ti NT e-.1 H N N N .7 .7 CV CV N N CS CV CV CV C1 CV N Z .7 .7 .7 .7 01 .7 C•1 - .7 r .7 .7 .T - .7 .7 a I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 .-1 .D ra .-I .T H rl r--1 ••••1 N r n .T N '--1 H o .-1 u'1 C•1 N O .a O ` ra N r♦ ri N C. C .1- CD 7C) V .-i n C'7 CO C"1 0 .T .T .D CD .D .D .-a .D d d O O O 0 0 0 C• 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O H Z Z Z 0 Z CA z z w z H z Cl) Z HHH Cl) W 1--i 42 a HP. H H ..] El H Paa H H Z Z EEC+ Z Cl) Z C+ E W C4 04 E z N I--I H Z Z P. H H 134 H C4 voi voi 1-4> z z z z z z z .04 CO z z H H H O H O El C9 N Z Z Z 0 CD CO Z Z C) C7 Z Z H Z Z cra 1-i A E H PA H < Z a W W Z Z H W Cl) W H �I 4 Ej T. H W .= Z H H Haj `P. X C12.1 /) X El C1~ g C. ai C/) E �7 0 H H 4-7 4-1 Lr+ H Gt+ H H H W D O A W GW. aW. CLI ril = 0 H E)-1 0' 0' 00ad a 0' a 0 0 0 A o- as X W W ca00O W a. W 0 -z N N V) S4 H O 0 LLQ V) A AAAA H a H H H E E-4 c4 0 d d d d d 0 H O U U C) H 0 D D D D Z 0 1.11 W W W d H CL 0 A W W W W W El Z N '0 C4 000 C4 0 W W CO H 0000c4 1:4 P4 0' 0 ,--7 ral 0 CV A 0 0 C) >0 4-1 cO C) 04 E E H E E Z E Z Z W W W W W W W W H 0 7 C) 00 CO.) E W W W W W W W W W Z I C 0 a+ a a a s P. c. C1+ Z 0 H H E H W H O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O I E E H E CO. D x x x aL X d a. .7 0 0 0 0 H 04 d d � d � � d H Z CT 0UC) 0 W W x x xx x ON V) cn Cn V) cn cn v) cn CO cn cn ti in C) cn Cl) ra v -C �'n 1'c r V .jC i• '1F ri E O O O O 0 O O O O O 0 O O r♦ .-1 N N N .-1 N N N OD b t` N C"f Z 0 .D CO CO CS O 0 0 0 to to O O u1 to 01 01 .7 01 OD O `D .D .D CV N n O• 0 to r♦ to u1 01 O 0 C. C• u1 u1 to to .7 .7 C'7 C�1 rt O .7 O .D O O N h op r') Z N to N CV 0 O 0 r+ .-I 7 . N N .D .D r♦ rl V> N r1 .--1 .7 N N C• C• d d co co- co- co- .-1 .-1 .-I VY V> n N C/> V> Cl)- V> � 44-4 co- co-V> V> CV CS V> V> ..0 V> V> V>V> V> O. .--1 .--+ 4I tL V 4. 0 > V> CO = c4 0 W El C/3 W .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D H H r1 rl rl rl r1 .-1 r4 r♦ rl .4 r♦ rl .4 H rl rl C9 d \\\ . \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ W A .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .0 CY. 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O a4 \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ pL 0 .T .7 - .7 - .T .7 s .7 .T .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 s 0 W C• C. C• C• C• CT C` C• C. C. C. C• C• C. CT 0' W x CT C. C. CT C• C• C• as C• C' C. C• C• C• as CT = C) Ti r1 r1 4-1 4.-1 ri .--1 -4 --1 rl r1 .4 r1 r1 rl 0 O .a Z .7 to .D f- a C• O rf CV o^ .7 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 rl .-4 ra 0 x 0 o 0 0 0 0 o O 0 C 0 Z 0 •D .D .D .D .. .D .0 .D .O . .D D W d .7 - .T 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 C 0 0 0 Z = i - x x 5 W = T T T T -" 5 W .T. '5 N < • 0 .^. 0 0 0 0 C 0 C 0 0 0 O 00000000o -650o H 0 i z (1) < I 00 z a z 0 z 0 a Cil U H C1 4 v .' v ' f .0 .O .O .0 .0 N co CO co CO CO co co co co co b CO CO 0 U r Ui Ui U :.1 in J 11 IC) In In In In I!l to Lel In In LI" in In 11 In Lel .'7 M c" C1 cn C1 cn c^ cn c^. ^l C1 cn C1 cn en c'1 cn cn cn C) C'1 cn cn Cl Cl C) Z N ti CV N CV N h N CV :V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 O * N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 N. .-. .-i .--i r1 . I Sill v1 C . V1 111 C) 1N 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO C. CO b CO CO E ti C) N N N C^. Cl CV C1 C) C1 N 0 C) 01 CI Cl Cl Cl C) 0 Cl C•) C) M Z cn - - - - - - n. - - 4' 4' N -. - .7 -' 4' -' 4' N - r .t .t 0 I / II I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O 0 f1 N r1 H H r. N 0 N r1 .--1 .7 C1 . 1 . 1 . i . 1 .-1 N r1 C) 4 1� N 00 U N 0 .--1 .7 N 01 r N 4 S .--i C) CO rC In N .-1 N CO N r4 .--1 N N CO N U CO .0 C') .0 ri C) .� .0 co ri .* .-d r1 0. C) C) C1 .7 .-4 .p .0 CT .0 .! .-d .0 0 .p 0000 0 .O CT000 0 0000000000000 W U 0 C.) 0 C.5 V) H V) cn V) Z Z Z Z .z) > W cz) Cx1 H H H H Tr Z CO .H7 W rHl .Ha a v) CO L v1 CO W W W W W W W Cm: c:a W W H H a CO a a a H H m H H E 0 0 0 O O U U C/) O 0 U O r a < -4 f-7 Z HHHHHHHEIHHHH a H O ,7 O O 0 A >- CO CO H CO > 7 > > > 7 'J U > 7 'J J H > CO < N V) N P 0 < o 0 0 gc4 c4 cd c4 c4 c4 c4 W c4 c4 c4 c4c4 H Z a a z a a W W W W W W W W ,'Z Cz; L-1 W W o E U O U U U \ \ H \\ E N VI t/) C/) VI V) V) Z C/) CA VI C/) Cl) 0 ZHZZZ 0 0 V) Cn U 0 C9 W 0 W < H CO H H H Z ZHHZZ Z Z >4 >4 >4 94 >+ '.7+ U >• >+ r~ '>+ A Ev) EEE H H H H H H H EEEEEEE EEEE Ex-I LWs. gyg Z Z0 ) ZZ a waa 1-1 a aaaw .H.7 .H7aa 0 c:7 O W W W H H a > H H H E H H H H H H H E H H H H O ao4CLI aa cLc:2 nc4c4 0 < EEEE+ EEE < EEEE >+ 0 x 0 0 0 0- 00000 4.10.14.14.14.1 ZZZZZ A. a a a a Z HHHHH 5x 00 ZZZZZ sx v) c<amm1:0: cco in .a cncncnv) cn aaaaa ra ..7 I I I I I Z CO = ca CO CO CO .. 0:. W H 0 0 0 'J 0 W .0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 Cl) cn v) V) v2 v) H N A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z O c4 c4 c4 csr = E EEE E < CO W 0: A A A A A v) v) C/) v) C/) a 0 > z W L_' W W W Z c4o4cea < 33333 0 - Cz) W W W W -- x x = x 0 a CACCIA E- E E E E E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. W ›. ›. P+ >• >4 0 ^ 000 C/) 0000000000D0D c. Z ZZZZZ o 0 0 0 0 0 a a a a a a a a (14 a a a a a 0' Cl) C/) VI V) V) V) v) Cn v) V) C!) Cn Cl) C/) N V) Cn v1 V) C/) C/) V) v) v2 V) V) r♦ n it H E C'1 O O In O. .0 C) .0 CT 0 0 N .0 0 .7 .--1 CD as a 0 N N. .0 CT N In CO 0 H N - O. Z N. 0 0 cn .'t 0 co cn 0 O CO .0 in 0 CT 0 rC 1` N 0 in C') co CT .0 .0 0 .7 N cn D in 0 0 CO cn C1 c'1 co .-4 C) C1 0 0 0 0 n 0 u1 .o 0 In In 0 u1 C'1 0' .t CO N -4' In .0 0 L1 4' 1'7 X S .7 4' V} rC N N O. %o N N N N CO N IA PV 4' 4' In .'t .p ri Cl n O. ,4 ^ ^ O N In .--1 V} VY VY V} N C/? ri N N N N .•-1 .-1 .0 0 VY V> O. N .7 C1 N V1 V}N r1 N 0 ..7 N - CO. VY Cl)- VY V> Cl)- Cl)' - Cl)' Cl)- 01. Cl)' - CO- - -Cl)-N Si ra .a .0 r1 W C) Ci? Cl)' Cl)' V> Cz1 x x 0 w E U) Cr] .0 .0 .p .0 .0 .O .0 .0 '0 .0 .0 .0 .p .0 .p .p .0 .p .0 .p .p .0 .p .p .0 .p H E .-1 .-4 H .-1 ra .-1 .--1 - H r1 4.-1 .--1 H H .-1 r-1 - - .-1 r1 r♦ H .-1 .-1 .--1 C9 < \ \\\\\ \ \\\\\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\ W A '0 .O .O .0 .0 .p .0 .0 ' .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 '0 .0 .0 I:4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x \ \\\\\ \ \\\\\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\ x 0 d' .7 4' v -' .7 ` 4' .7 .T .7 .7 .7 v .7 .T 4' .Y' .7 .7 .7 .7 4- 0 W 0. 0% O. O. O. ON C• 0' C• 0. O. ON CT 0. C. 0. O. C. C' C. 0. O. 0. O. 0. O. W 0 O. 0% 0. 0+ 0+ O. C' CT C' 0, O. 0. O. O. 0. 0. ON ON 0• 0. 0% O. 0 0. 0. O% x 0 .-4 _1 r♦ .-4 .--i r-4 r H - .-1 r-1 rd r1 .--1 .-4 .--1 r1 .--1 .-4 ri .--1 .--1 .-4 r-1 .--1 ri 0 0 .-.1 Z In .0 n CO C• 0 H r--1 .--1 •'-1 .-1 N 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 .0 .0 1/40 .0 .0 .0 Cz7 .T v .7 v ,:" - 0 0 0 0 O O O O x x 1 ri 0 0 00500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 z 4<i)/0 g Co a E z 0 a i W 0 .D H co CT 0 0 0 0 0 r-1 N N M c1 c1 C) •7 VI O CO 1n .D .0 .D .D .D •D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .G .D .7 n cn c. M on en cn C1 C'1 en M C1 en en cn cn C1 .O Z .-i CV CV N CV CV N C' CV CV CV CV CV CV N CV CV N H M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV C• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .D * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV 0 0 H 0' C•1 CI C". CI 01 .7 Cn M H to ri r-i c'1 n r-i r-1 E-. C1 .7 N N CV CV CV CV Cl Cl CV to CV CV C1 v N N Z .7 M .7 7 .T V .7 S h -T - J .7 C1 .7 .7 p 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1r1 CV rd N CO .--I v .D H .D H r-i ra r-1 r4 r-1 r-1 0. C.> n 1n Co co CV CV OD CV CV n CV rd v rd u'1 r-1 r4 CV U .-i .O ,4 .-1 .D M rd - ri .--1 .7 M .T C1 H VD .D .D 4 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD W W. 0 Z H LWs. E W W Cn V) V1 W 0 co V1 HH CWn 0 F F F F F Z H H 0.1 Oa.. 0.. E.W.' ,-.1 a 0.• F F ZZZZZ H co co a as cn 0 a a c4 Z c4 gggOg pa pa co U 0 U F Oa 0E• 00 0 Z 0 0 C/1 H W 0 0 0 0 0 z C/D V) ZZZZ VI H z z W VD C- ZZZZZ W \\ H W H H \ 3 H H A co H H H H H Z a s F Z F F .a cn Ei F1 W c4 A A A A A a W WW a W 44 W r.] rlrarl .a H D '> Hgg .7 .a 0 E4 00000 0' g ga ao. aaW1 a 0 a a W.1 a o ca 00xasa) W FEI 0W00 F a 0 0 x zzzzz WCn H H H H H W 0 C9 0 0 0 C4 W 1n ZZZZZ H H H H H H F 0 .--1 H C4 I-1 >- r ZZZZZ • Z Vo 0 0 d6C6d cn x c4 c4 Z N AW W W Ls7 W W ›. C4 V) cn V) V) L-7 H z e aaaaa a ¢ C4 g4 ;14 > X x w Co W 0 00000 O as W W W W W W x O Z V) V) V) V) V) F • • U U U 0 H V) Z H H 0 x x x x Ca x x H H H H ,'Etx.1 0 Z a' CLQ 7 0 0 W W W W O co S L:. < Q Q < cs.'C W 0 0 a a' cd cG x 0 4.1 H CT w' F F F F F F F F F F F F F < x H C4 CT cn cn cn cn cn CI co co Cn cn cn cn cn V1 F F H F .-4 r♦ F O CO Co O O ,4 .7 n C• CV c1 N N to O 1n CV CV N O .D n n O O N C' .7 Z n N CV O O •D 1n .-1 4' .7 CV CT C• .D O .D n .D n .-4 CT .D .D O 0 1n Len on 0 0 n n on C' .-4 .D C• C. r1 0 0 0 47 .D 0 •0 CT .D C. Cr1 0 0 .D .D C•) r1 0 ,Z.. 01 M Cl 1n 1!1 H .7 r•1 4-1 r•1 .-1 VI 1n CV to CO N .O CV .7 n 1n in hT .7 C" C') co C41 0 0 co- co. .-4 CV <I> Cl)' Cl)' .7 Cl)' C/ Ch Cl). Cl)' .--1 C1 r-1 r♦ - Cr}Cl)' VT Ch Cl)' O. n ....1 . .. Cl)- CJI. V> CI) ' Cl)' V> Cl)' i.1 x C.; .-1 .-d r-1 I 4-1 tz. 0 .-1 C/> V> N' V> W Cl). x x U w F di) W .D .D .D .D .D .D .D •D .D .D V, .D .D .D .D .D .D .D H F .-4 .--i '-d r l .-4 r-1 r-I r-C r-1 .-4 r-1 H .4 r-i .-1 .-1 •-1 ra 0 d \ \ \\\\\ \ \\ \\\\ \ \ \ \ W A .D .D .D VJ .D 1/40 .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D aG O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O \ \ \\\\\ \ \\ \\\\ \ \ \ \ U s .7 s .T .7 .7 .7 S s .7 .7 S .7 .7 .7 .7 "O- C.) 7C) W C• C• C• C• C• C• C• C• C• C• C• C• C. C• C• C. CT a• W y' C• CT a• C. C• C` C• C• C• C. C. a• C• C7. C` C• a• as x U .a -4 r-1 .-4 .-C .-4 .-i H r4 .-4 r-1 r-i .-4 .-1 -4 .-1 r-i .-d 0 0 I-1 Z c4 CV c"1 7 1n .D n CO C• 0 H N N CV CV CV C' CV CV CV C" 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 .D .D .D .D .D V) .D .D .O .D A Cs? .7 .7 .T .7 v - 0 = 0 O O O 0 O O O 0 0 0 U < 0 6 = 356 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C o 5350 0 0 0 0 -4z 4) < 00 x co a 0 z 0 a Le. U H fs N N n fs f'• n N N N fs. fs. n n fs. r. f\ CD C 0 --1 .r -I .-1 .-i .--r .-1 --i 0 .o .o .O .O .O .D .O .O .o .o .o .O .O .O .D .O .o .O .; f\ N rs fss N N N f`, N > M M M C''1 C"1 C'1 C7 Cil M M M M M M M M M M C^. M M M M M M M M M Z c' N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * •- -v1 .-I .-4 --1 4-1 4-1 .-i --1 .--1 .-1 ri .--1 0 H .-1 H O 0 O 00000 0 0 0 CV CV N C\ CV N N N N N N N N C1 N N N N C^ .-1 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO E M M M M M M M M M M M M c"1 .7 M M M M cos N M M M M M M M M Z < s •sr sr - sr - ...7 0 -0 - 0 0 - - - -.7 - 0 0 .. 00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O N H .-i 4. 1 .-i .-i .--1 .-4 .--i ..A .-1 .--I -t --1 .-4 .--1 CO .-i .-i --i .--1 N 4' H CO -I N O CO N N .--1 CO M .--1 N Css .--1 M to .o f-- .7 M N N to .-4 CO N C) CO M N .-1 N U .-I M - M .-1 .--1 --1 -I .--1 .7 M --1 .--1 .-1 .O f'• .o v .-1 .--1 M .-1 .-1 .O .O M .O < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G:- V) Z C. w 1-1 O CZ_' 01 w w W. w w ww w H E U V: O. 4-4 H H H H H H H A H A > > > > > > > > 1-4 0 V: V) c4 cd 6'C. c4 c4 N.. cd c4 W w C w w L-' w w V.1 w W U z: w w .1 w w w w w w w w w Z w w w ACA V) Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z <d Z Z Z V: 0 V)V2 V) N V] w 00000000000OO .1O0O w \ H >. >+ >+ >. >+ >4 >I >4 A x x A x A A x x x S x x a x x x 0 .- E E E F E E F E E E-7 a. 0. a. C4 a. C4 G. R. f�. fs. o.. a. w a. a. a. < Lz: H H H H H H H H c:: w w w w W www w www U w W El > .aaaaaaaa a a a a a a a a a a a a a fn a s V) < W H H H H H H H H t, w w E4 w w w w w w w w w H w w w 0 C a E E E E E F E E E E E+ E E E H E E E E E E Z E E E G. E 0 A A 0 A A 0 A 0 Z 0 H Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 H H H H H H H H H E E F E E F E E W teWWZWWZWW U P. L.] L1 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z H F \04 EFEEEEEEEEEEFEEE co t_ A w w w w W w W w .D O 00000000000000000 /W� a 000C-10000 NA U U U U U U U U U 0 0 0 U U U U U 0 LL' < < < < < < < < co Z EE. EE, E-IE-, EEE-tEEEFEEEEE C - 3 333333 0 > V) Cl) U V) V) V) V) V) N N V) N C/) U V) V) V) 0 C L-' w w w w Csl w w w w w w w w w w w A. Z co 33333333333333333 5 >.I [Cw1EEU+ EEE�� EE v: Co Co co co co co co co v) V) CI) CI) V) V) CA VI Vi a Cn V) N VI V) V) V) V) ots O. A A A A A a A A A A 00 = = A A A 0 C 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 --1 N ( r r * .--I H 0 0 0 N O. .7 0% O. M 0 N - .-1 .O .-i .o to -d N 0 O .7 - M c: tin 1s 0 CO O. .-i .-1 v1 Z M .o .o O. M N M 0.) 0 0 u1 M .7 al to --i N CO M 0 O M M N N N .7 .--1 O. 0 N N O% 0 0 O .D .--1 CO CO N Cl -i N M to O. fs. c0 N t(1 to O. t` CO CO f\ fs. O. C` M N O. .!1 0 .7 .7 to 17 c0 --i --1 CO CO .o N 4-.1 to N M M .7 .7 V} - V> N CO to u1 to al .D .O u1 M u1 .-1 .7 .7 .'t u1 I", -1 .-1 .-i .O V> CA CA CA V> .-1 VY.-I V> V> V> f-- V} N V}V> CA V? CA V> VY V} .--1 V>VY M +1 V> V> C/} CA V} CA V> - CA CA LI ?4 H Lc. U CA w G: U w El co w .o .O .o .O .o .O .O .o .O .D .O 1/40 .O .D .O .O .o .O .O .o .O .0 .O .D .D .O .O .O 1-1 E -i .-i .-1 .-i .-1 .-1 .-1 --1 4-1 4-4 .-i .--1 4-1 .-1 .-4 -1 .-1 -1 .-1 --1 --1 --i 4..-1 .--1 .-1 --i -a 0 < \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\ w A NO .o .D .D .o .O .O .0 .o .D .D .D .D .O .O .D .O .0 .D .D .D .D .0 .O .0 .D .O .O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\ ?4 U 0 0 .7 0 .7 .7 .7 .7 S .7 -7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 s 0 d .7 .7 0 .7 . .7 .7 U w O• O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. 0% O• O` O. O\ O• O. O. O• O• O. O. O• O. 0% a O. 0% 0% C7.1 "'"' a O. O. O+ O. O. rn O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O% O. O• O. O. O. T O. O% O. O. O. = U - .-1 .-i .-1 .-1 .-i 4-1 4-4 --i ri .-1 .--i 4-1 .-i -: .-1 .-i --1 .- .-4 1-4 .-1 .-4 --1 .-1 .-1 4-1 .--1 0 O a Z --1 N M .7 H M M M v., 2 U 0 O O O 0 C.) .7 .O .O .o s; te.O O O O O U C: In < = 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 v z 0 00 Cl.) •z A z 0 a W 0 H .--1 N C^. .0 1n .D .D .D .D .D .D .D N 0 N N N N N N n n n n n n n N "> C•) M C") C1 M C1 C'1 C'1 C1 C') C) C"1 C1 M Z N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 It 0 0 0 0 .n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 .!1 .--1 .--i .� .-i ., .-1 .-i .-1 r-1 H S E-r on C'1 .l1 N N N N ti N N N N N N Z .T d .T v .T - .` < .T v .T .T 0 .-4 ..^I .-1 .-i n .-d N CI .--1 .-1 C1 N r-1 H U N CO .7 -• N N N .-+ H .--i r-1 .-1 C d U S - .; c'1 .D N C7 .T C1 c'l Cl .T < 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z z Z H P.) P) H H H H H H W 0 W W a E~ aaaaaaa EI H U U a Z a C.. a a a a a Z E+ H 4-I a H a C. a a a a a H P. > 7 a0 a E 0 0 H a C4 Ci) U) v cn N C/) VI t/1 gz1 P) U CO 0 E, 0 Cn E-, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E, cn Z z a ZZZZZZZZ Z W P. P. W H Q (y H H H F'1 4-4 H H W A El H z E, H zHHEyHHEyH Z e-1P-1H W H 0.'C4 . ggggggH H H O W H = W W W W W W W 'J H H 0' a ' Ora a a a a a a 0' a A W 0 Z W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 z z H H ZZ a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 irt.1 C4 W W 0 W 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 A A A A A A A A 0 N A d 6 W En ce W H 2 2 = S = = = x z co w ' W m a cncncncncncnNcn 0 p A z a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C4 H < W 0 CA Cn Cn Cn En 0 CFI W W W CO H O Cn Cn Ci) CO Cl) CO CO CO a El H H z O p o O D D D D 0 s Cl) cn v: .a C4 CG ao404 w W a 3 3 3 3 § r >4 >4 >4 r >4 >4 >4 N H N r H E I •D N Q. O• CO co CO CO S .7 c'1 N CO 0 1n .O N N CO 0 0 C'1 ZN .11 1n ut 1n un 0 0 0 0 .D .T 1n 0 P1 CO 1n .-I .T 0 0 0 ,^f 0 M 01/4 .4 H .Y .T n n CO CO CO C'7 n .-I .D v •D N Ill NO .D C') 1-j `f.. .-1 111 .O .D C'1 Cn 1n 6r, O. O• .-1 n N C/> r-1 .4 .-1 C/> n .T .T N •C: 1-4 CO C'. C• CO CO N N C1 Ch Cl) N (1> Ch C/> U> M V> Cl> as •r! Cn• Cl> V> V> V> C/> C/> (I> 14 P4 CO CO 0 0 '"1 W U C'1 C'7 .D .D `T W v> v> v> Cl> r"I G4 0 W N E• Cl) W .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D '0 .D .D .D .D .D Fi H .-1 H .-1 .-1 1-4 .--1 ra .-1 .d .-1 .-1 .-4 .-d 1-1 C.9 < \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\ \ W A .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .O .0 .D .D .D .D C4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\ \ AL U .T 7 .T .T d - T - .T .7 .T S < .T U W O. ON O. O` O. 0' ON ON CT O• O• ON C' ON W x ON C• CT ON ON O• CT 0' CT C• C' ON Cr CT x 0 .-4 .-1 H .--1 .--1 .-1 H .--1 .-i .-d .-1 .-1 .-1 H 0 0 a Z .D n CO C' 0 r-1 N 1-1 cn C'1 C'1 c': .T .T .T U PL 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 z 0 .D .D .D .0 .D .D .D a W d .T v. .7 .' .T .T 0 = 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 U U CO4-4 CA CZ a •o 0 ON 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 o% Cn .-1 0% 0 t 0 0 ch n t 0 •O 0 0 c') 0 0 O+ t 'o N 1/1 n 0 0 0 n co %n .-I 0 In In t co N C% t V} n O ch C co n C. co - 0 in CO C% CO c.1 .-1 an M 0 CO N O .--1 .-1 %O 0 N t n .-I t N t V> .-1 0 c0 C` V} ch CA t .--1 ON N 'o N 0 0 n 0 t r1 CO V} M) N u9 VT M N N O V> I .--i t t Vo .-I N VY .-I VY V} 'O .-I .-I C+ V? VY V> V> • Vy as N t .-1 Cl). V> n .-I V Z aA 0 0 a Z N.W Cl) + w 1 A GX4 w a w 3 6 Cl) H s+ Z W > W Z < > ra Z A CX4 O 04 04 > 0 0 Cl) H 04 E+ >+ ..a F. )W-I W a H Cx. 0 X c4 A >4 Z Cl) gH E• C~ Z 1-4 Z H W Z d N x H ' Ey 1-4 t H W r-7 04 Cr) Z d � Q < o+ X 0% < E H Cl) Z H cn 0 E• = .-I o.. U .-I W A .-1 cn cn O W H E-. O .--1 t u1 CM 0 .-I N t V1 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 .-1 .--1 .-4 N N N N N c') .I M 07 t .!1 '.O x 0 .--1 .-1 M t t t t t t n n co c0 00 co 0 a H * 4k * 4k ik * * * * it * ik 1 4 4 0 Z 0 A A 0 0 0 0 0 A A C A 0 A A A A Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O D O O a C7 O O C7 p O = O O O O 0 Gx. Cx. Cx. Ci. C:. Cx. a Cx. a. Cx. a Cx. a Cx. a. Cx. 0 TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Budget Status DATE: June 21, 1994 The cover sheets for the bill list for the Council meeting of 6/21/94 contains a budget status report. The line for the shop division is shown at 104%. This is due to partial payment on the installation of new fuel tanks and administrative oversight in not including the appropriation for the tanks in the shop division. Funding is from the Capital Equipment Fund and a budget amendment will correct the deficit. CONSENT MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SUBJECT: Nominations to Planning Commission DATE: June 17 , 1994 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: There are two vacancies on the Planning Commission due to the recent resignations of Joe Kelly and Joe Zak. Two applications have been received todate. Display ads were placed in the Shakopee Valley News on May 12th and again on June 2nd. Notices were posted at City Hall and at Shakopee Public Utilities. A notice has been placed on the cable access channel. Applications have been received from Todd Bladow and James Link. According to City policy, nominations shall be made at one meeting and appointments made at the following meeting. The interview committee will be interviewing the applicants prior to appointments in July. They will also be invited to observe the Planning Commission meeting on July 7th. (Two applications were received last January from individuals expressing a desire to serve on the Planning Commission. They agreed to serve on other Boards since there were insufficient openings on the Planning Commission at that time. They have both been contacted about the current openings and neither are interested in appointment to the Planning Commission at this time, but desire to continue on the Boards they are currently serving on. ) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to nominate Todd Bladow and James Link to the Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment and Appeals. nu = AVIasza 9SWA RI 'Iran APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS ANI/OR CC> 1ISSIONS City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City Boards and/or Commissions. What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you must have an interest in serving your community. The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically have from one to two meetings per month, as follows: Planning Commission/Board of 1st Thursday after 1st Adjustments and Appeals Tuesday at 7 : 30 p.m. Community Development Commission 3rd Wednesday at 5 : 00 p.m. Energy & Transportation Committee 3rd Wednesday at 7 : 00 p.m. Cable Communication Commission Quarterly or as needed on Monday at 7 : 30 p.m. Housing Advisory and Appeal Board As Needed Building Code Board of Adjustment As Needed & Appeals Shakopee Public Utilities 1st Monday at 4 : 30 p.m. Commission Park & Recreation Advisory Board 4th Monday at 7 : 00 p.m. Police Civil Service Commission As Needed Community Youth Building 2nd Saturday of the month Committee at 9 : 00 a.m. Board of Review 7 : 00 p.m. 2 to 3 Tuesdays in May Name: /0 &Lt 231_,EVICZV Address : "/..56 S�44 4/14i t 1 Phone: (H) 4/96"3�3C (B) %,Z&" 9.5. 4 How long have you been a resident of Shakopee? �.�CS Occupation: Ace�e,�•Fr 4 c22iujd/ A ) Does your work require you to travel? (check one) A great deal 17-Periodically Very little Not at all / Do you have any special interests or training which you feel a particular board or commission could use? (Use separate sheet if necessary) � . 1 / ,. , �, ,�� z� pct% __t��. isL�.ti�w/�-c,C/- ��Ld`�dCt �, -��t. �.C GLC�L,L d Board or Commission in which you are interested? 70414t.ilt.C.4f../ (1/171.1t1.4.4-. 'Lt.-04AD i e--4 -(11.4.-A- 6.1-4.4-44- v i Please state briefly why you are interested in serving on this Board/Commission for which you are submitting an application:/J vi 2.4..t.L.L /4...Z.)-4-4-) 1.-4,... Ly 2/71 }/,.i.- ik' -t--c— l' i Lti 4et_4.1.-L' •/ .4.44.6 zit..? jhuta adettt„ru ( ) &Ade_ ic.).„4.4„i -e4,../. -6.:, cope„...,_ a70.4#3 *,_, Atai , &.l otai..f 4.ff eli_:-� /.2: fc , n Conflict ✓of interest is defied as the participati ind in any aactivity, recommended action, or decision from which l has or could have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or indirect. In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable interest in any business, however organized,. which could be constructed as a conflic t of lnterest? Yes No separate sheet of paper. If yes, please provide the detailson a Please list three references (Name, Address and Phone) : _ 379 i. /A al-4,1-44) / 1715-�f 41a u ' ,� S Sat 4141s--566_ 2 . /e4 A4744;a4k) /0/2- ,(1/44,X, 4.4,1-41-1 h ` z/yc-2?23 3 . %t 6,6,4 '196 -/cS6 i hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. )2,:et.X. It L Signature RETURN APPLICATION AND PLEDGE TO: Date City Clerk City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 445-3650 DATE RECEIVED: (IA& 9:L. APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL AD':ISORY BOARDS AND/CR COMMISSIONS City of Sha:•::pee 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 We welcome you as a possible a;plicant for one of our City Boards and/or Commissions. What are the qualifications fcr serving cn these advisory Boards and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you must have an interest in serving your community. The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically have from one to two meetings per month, as follows: PZan`ning Commission/Board of is: Thursday after 1st Adjustments and Appeals Tuesday at 7 : 30 p.m. eve3"t515ment Com :issicn 3rd Wednesday at 5: 00 p.m. n • . - • _ . Cable Communication Commission Quarterly or as needed on Monday at 7 : 30 p.m. Housing Advisory and Appeal Board As Needed Building Code Board of Adjustment As Needed & Appeals Shakopee Public Utilities 1st Monday at 4 : 30 p.m. Commission Park & Recreation Advisory Board 4th Monday at 7 : 00 p.m. Police Civil Service Commission As Needed . . _ • e• 2nd Sa - = - h Board of Review 7 :00 p.m. 2 to 3 Tuesdays in May Name: James A. Link Address: 1043 Main South Main Street Phone: (H) 496-0521 (B) 445-3060 How long have you- been a resident of Shakopee? 22 Years Occupation: Real Estate Appraiser • Does your work require you to travel? (check one) A great deal Periodically 1 Very little Not at all Do you have any special interests or training which you feel a particular board or commission could use? (Use separate sheet if necessary) _ Extensive real estate background. Informed of consequenses of decision making process Board or Commission in which you are interested? - Planning Commision Please state briefly why you are interested in serving on this Board/Commission for which you are submitting an application: I have a strong interest in the future of this community. I have no hidden agenda. I want to see Shakopee grow and be aggresive. Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any activity, recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or indirect. In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable interest in any business, however organized, which could be constructed as a conflict of interest? Yes No X - If yes, please provide the details on a separate sheet of paper. Please list three references (Name, Address and Phone) : 1. Bob Sweeney, 506 South Holmes Street 445-2493 2. Brian Norris, 1100 East 4th Avenue, Shakopee 445-8200 3 . Dave Moonen, 223 South Holmes Street, 445-6246 I hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are and correct to t best of my knowledge. true Signature • RETURN APPLICATION AND PLEDGE TO: ,; - __-- L -- i-< Date - / City Clerk City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 445-3650 DATE RECEIVED: I /61c MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Meetings for July and August DATE: June 15, 1994 INTRODUCTION: It is time for the City Council to set an agenda of meetings for the months of July and August . In that some people are going to be out of town on the week of July 4 - 8, I would like the Council to discuss potential different meeting dates for Regular Council meetings. I would also like the City Council to affirm a schedule for Committee of the Whole meetings so we can discuss the 1995 Budget as well as the Housing/Economic Development Authority issue. Any other issues that need to be discussed in a Committee of the Whole setting should also be discussed at this time . REGULAR AND ADJOURNED COUNCIL MEETINGS The month of August has five Tuesdays . Therefore, I would like the City Council to consider holding Regular and Adjourned Council meetings on Tuesday July 12th, July 26th, August 9th and August 23rd. This would result in two weeks between all meetings during the months of July and August as well as a two week period from the last meeting in August on the 23rd to the first September meeting on the 6th. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS I am suggesting that the first Committee of the Whole meeting for budget discussion purposes be held on June 28th or, as an alternative, July 11th. I am also suggesting that an additional meeting be held on July 19th and that additional meetings be scheduled for the month of August on the 25th and 30th. This schedule will allow the setting of an additional meeting or meetings during the earlier part of September if necessary. According to the most recent information we have the preliminary tax levy must be certified by September 15th. The 1995 budget public hearing and adoption will be in late November or December. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council discuss the subject, evaluate vacation schedules and other times when Councilmembers will be out of town and adopt a July - August meetings schedule and pass a resolution setting the Regular Council meetings on July 12th and August 9th. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4032, A Resolution Changing the July 5th and August 2nd, 1994 Council Meeting Dates and move its adoption. Move to set the first Committee of the Whole meeting to discuss budget issues on June 28th at 5 : 00 P.M. Move to tentatively set additional budget discussions at Committees of the Whole meetings on July 19th - 5 : 00 PM, August 25th and 30th also at 5 : 00 PM. RESOLUTION NO. 4032 A RESOLUTION CHANGING THE JULY 5TH AND AUGUST 2ND, 1994 COUNCIL MEETING DATES WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Code has set the first Tuesday of each month as the regular meeting date for the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Code allows the City Council to change the meeting date by adopting a resolution at least one week prior to the regularly scheduled meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the July 5 and August 2, 1994 regularly scheduled City Council meetings be changed to July 12 and August 9, 1994 at 7: 00 P.M. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 21st day of June, 1994 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee A=TEST: City Clerk Al=roved as to form. City Attorney Jun e 1 9 9 4 Proposed Dates/Budget Schedule SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 5:00pm COW Goals: CC Direction to Staff May July SM T W TF S SMTW T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 July 1994 Proposed Dotes/Budget Schedule SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 7:00pm Proposed City Council 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 5:00pm COW - Budget: CIP Housing Issues 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 7:00pm Proposed Worksheets due City Council from Departments 31 dune August SMTW TF S SMT W T F S 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 31 Au gu s t 1 9 9 4 Proposed Dates/Budget Schedule SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 LCA/HACA Info due from State 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 7:00pm Proposed City Council 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Preliminary 7:00pm Proposed 5:00pm COW: budget City Council Budget material to Council 28 29 30 31 1. Preliminary Levy to be certified 5:00pm COW: September 15th Budget 2. December - Budget Public Hearing and adoption duly September SM T W TF S SMTW T F S 1 2 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 /.35, TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: 1994/95 Insurance Renewals DATE: June 15, 1994 Introduction Attached is a list of property/liability insurance premiums for the renewal of the present coverage. The policy period is July 1, 1994 to June 30, 1995. Background Basic Policy The policies proposed are essentially the same as current coverage. The premiums are similar to last year, considering that there are some changes in items covered. Please see attachments A and B. The total initial premium has decreased from $203 ,730 to $190, 572 covering the City, SPUC and HRA. The primary reason for the decrease is a premium for liability coverage. Attachment B also shows the dividend history and the loss history for recent years. Please note the large loss incurred in 1987 . Because of our participation in the League program, this loss has not resulted in a large increase in our cost of insurance or in the cancellation of our coverage. Deductible Level Last year Council increased the deductible to $1, 000 at a premium saving of $14, 569. This year alternative quotes at different deductible levels were not requested. The deductible for transformers over 9, 000 KVA will be $7 , 500. Petro Fund If the city is in compliance with applicable PCA and EPA regulations and requirements for petroleum storage tanks, the state petro fund provides reimbursement for part of the costs of clean up and liability costs in the event of a leak or spill. Insurance coverage for the remaining costs and legal defense costs is available. The Council took out this coverage last year and at that time indicated that coverage would not be renewed after the installation of new fuel tanks. The new tanks are installed and a quotation was not requested. Umbrella Policy_ Council did not budget for an umbrella policy nor has there been a recent request for or discussion of getting another umbrella policy. The city has not had an umbrella policy for about seven years. The League reports that about 25% of the cities insured have an umbrella policy. There is some exposure that may not be not covered by immunity, particularly in the area of federal legislation such as civil rights and discrimination. The are two variations of an umbrella policy available. For a $1, 000, 000 policy, the version that keeps the $600, 000 state immunity level in place would cost $39,920. Waiving the immunity would cost $54,258 . Articles from the League recommend that what ever decision is made to have or not to have an umbrella policy, the minutes should reflect that the Council carefully considered the decision and their reason for reaching that decision. Most of the coverages are from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. The boiler and machinery policy is from the Hartford Co. The policies of course are not prepared, but there is more detail available on the proposals for any Council member that desires it. Employee Bonding The employee bonding coverage is a renewal from United Casualty at a quote of $1, 547 for a $50, 000 limit. The cost was the same last year. Alternatives la. Renew policies. lb. Go without insurance. 2a. Status quo without umbrella policy. 2b. Obtain umbrella policy for $39, 920 and keep immunity limits. 2c. Obtain umbrella policy for $54, 258 and waive immunity limits. Action Requested Move to accept the property/liability insurance proposals of the League of Minnesota Cities and Hartford and employee bonding coverage from United Casualty. Move to decline the petro fund coverage for 1994/95. Discuss and decide whether or not to obtain an umbrella policy and if obtained, which version (keeping or waiving the immunity limits) . CITY OF SHAKOPEE -6- COMPANY 6- COMPANY PREM I LANA C O M P A R I S O N SUMMARY : 1994- 1995 1993- 1994* PROPERTY $ 24 , 200 $ 24 , 644 INLAND MARINE $ 2 , 051 $ 2 , 266 CRIME $ 2 , 141 $ 2 , 141 *MUNICIPAL LIABILITY $ 122 , 916 $ 134 , 669 ERRORS & OMISSIONS INCLUDED INCLUDED AUTOMOBILE $ 30 , 182 $ 31 , 601 BOILER & MACHINERY $ 9 , 082 1_ 8 , 409 TOTAL PREMUIM $ 190 , 572 $203 , 730 *Premiums at Inception of Policy & Does Not Include Interim Endorsements or Updates CITY OF SHAKOPEE -7- LOSS HISTORY : Year # of Total Incurred Claims Loss 6-30-85/86 5 $128 , 461 6-30-86/87 12 $791 , 854 6-30-87/88 7 $ 21 , 152 6-30-88/89 10 $ 17 , 599 6-30-89/90 13 $ 5 , 250 6-30-90/91 15 $ 9 , 573 6-30-91 /92 22 $ 67 , 899 6-30-92/93 17 $ 8 , 926 (Open ) 6-30-93/94 10 $ 22 , 595 Dividend History : 1988 - $ 19 , 772 1989 - $33 , 202 1990 - $38 , 509 1991 - $61 , 144 1992 - $48 , 464 1993 - $44 , 342 8. EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE LIMITS What can go wrong The statutes limit the city's tort liability to$600,000 per occurrence. LMCIT provides a standard $600,000 liability coverage limit to match the statutory limit. However, there are several ways in which that coverage could turn out not to be enough. For example: • The statutory limits do not apply to some of the city's liability exposures. Some possible examples are liability under the federal civil rights laws; liability assumed by contract; liability for actions in another state (under an inter-state mutual aid agreement, or while a city officer is attending an out-of-state conference, for example); or inverse condemnation liability for land use regulation actions. • The LMCIT liability coverage includes annual aggregate limits on the products liability coverage, the limited pollution liability coverage, and the land use liability coverage. If the city should experience more than one liability incident in one of these areas in a single year, the city's LMCIT coverage might not cover the full extent of the city's liability under the statute. • Although the statutory liability limits have now been tested several times in court and have been upheld, it is still conceivable that the courts might someday change their minds and hold the municipal tort liability limits unconstitutional. All of these represent ways in which the city could conceivably end up with more liability than it has coverage. If so, the city would have to bear the excess from its own resources. There is another issue too that some view as a problem. The tort liability limits literally mean that if an injured individual's proven damages exceed the statutory limits, he will not be fully reimbursed for the damage he has suffered because of the city's negligence. Since the statutes include a"per-occurrence" limit as well as a "per- claimant" limit, an individual's reimbursement could be severely limited if a number of other people were also injured in the same incident. E.g., if 60 people were injured in a single incident -- say a bleacher collapses, or a city vehicle hits a school bus full of kids -- there could be as little as $10,000 available under the statutory limits to compensate each person. In other words, the statutory liability limits mean that sometimes an individual will not be fully compensated for the damage the city has caused. How to avoid the problem The city should consider purchasing higher limits of liability coverage. LMIT makes available up to $5,000,000 of additional limits at the city's option. LMCIT's standard excess liability coverage is structured so that the statutory liability limits remain in effect for those claims to which they apply. However, LMCIT also gives the city the option, for an additional premium, to waive the statutory liability limits to the extent of the city's excess coverage limits. This "waiver" option would make more funds available to an injured party on a claim where the statutory liability limits would otherwise limit the amount the claimant could recover. Buying higher liability coverage limits gives the city better protection against the risks it faces. Note though that buying the more expensive 'waiver" option does not give the city any better protection; rather, it gives the person the city injures better protection by allowing him to recover more than he would otherwise be able to from the city. There is no simple "right answer to the question of whether your city should buy excess liability coverage limits, and if so whether to do so under the 'waiver" or the "non-waiver" option. These are discretionary decisions that only the council can decide. The council must determine whether the added protections (for the city and for the party the city might injure, respectively) are worth that additional expenditure of city funds. Sometimes city officials reason that "we are only a small city, so we don't need high liability coverage limits." But arguably the opposite is true: A big city has much more tax base and many more taxpayers over which to spread, say a $1,000,000 excess judgment; in a small city, the burden per taxpayer could be enormous. \ 9:. PETROLEUM TASK LEAKS OR SPILLS What can o wronn iesota'sfietrofund provides reimbursement for 90% of the clean-up and liability costsfrom a petroleum products storage tank leak or spill. But to be eligible for this reimbursement, the tank owner must be in compliance with applicable PCA and EPA regulations and requirements. The Petrofund reimbursement can be reduced or refused it,the owner is not in compliance. And in any event the city will be responsible for at least 10% of the clean-up and liability costs, as well as all legal defense costs associated with the leak or spill. How to avoid the problem If your city has an tanks, the first priority is make sure you comply with the applicable regulations, so that you will be eligible for Petrofund reimbursement if you CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator 1�' FROM: John H. DeLacey, Engineering Tech. III Vii" SUBJECT: Renaming of a Street in an Existing Plat DATE: June 16, 1994 INTRODUCTION: During the platting process for Homestead Ridge, it became apparent to staff that a street in the Meadows 9th Addition needs to have a name change. BACKGROUND: The Homestead Ridge Plat has a street that connects to an existing street (Indigo Lane) in the Meadows 9th Addition (See attached map). While reviewing the preliminary plat of Homestead Ridge, staff noticed that Indigo Lane extending through Homestead Ridge would connect at County Road 79 directly across from Mound Street in the P&V Addition. Per staff s recommendation, Indigo Lane was changed to Mound Street in the platting of Homestead Ridge. Staff is now requesting Council approval to change Indigo Lane to Mound Street in the Meadows 9th Addition. The changing of the street name should not cause any inconvenience as there are no homes built on this street as of now. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Pass Ordinance 378 changing Indigo Lane in the Meadows 9th Addition to Mound Street. 2. Do Nothing. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Offer Ordinance No. 378, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Renaming Indigo Lane Lying Within the Meadows 9th Addition to Mound Street, and move its adoption. JHD/pmp ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 378, FOURTH SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, RENAMING INDIGO LANE LYING WITHIN THE MEADOWS 9TH ADDITION TO MOUND STREET THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1 - Indigo Lane described below is hereby renamed Mound Street: All of Indigo Lane lying within the Meadows 9th Addition. Section 2 - Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the day of • 1994. A -- ilipiiiii911 imp jp OniniiP itiki 4 kMIS its, g, 1 sli kovin il, riki, LAN IN belt IN NENIN mu#"$1 L� G��S P U ' NY0 NM lemil..4 4041 16- II ------. IgAVOSib 0,4 Ills i INIIL _ 4. 4 Irlitearrip. z I thill www m NN • 0 . IP 4Q (/ (,-,) . ViCi ‹E 44 4-444 ONz = r * *41 N - �� S T7--om_ �V•�� Q - maw 0 rni Iliv --- .7,-- ._ _ simm i 4r _ ,_ OUND I tietti v) Tlyr L. 1 . SUBJECT AREA LJ J CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer SUBJECT: 1994 Pavement Preservation Program Project No. 1994-12 DATE: June 13, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 4021, a resolution approving plans and specifications and authorizing staff to advertise for bids for the 1994 Pavement Preservation Program, Project No. 1994-12. BACKGROUND: The 1994 Street Department Budget includes funds allocated for pavement preservation in the amount of $80,000.00. Staff has identified streets which would benefit from pavement rehabilitation activities, and has prepared plans and specifications for having the work completed. The streets that are proposed for improvement with this project are: 11th Avenue, between Tyler Street and County Road 15 Madison Street, between 10th Avenue and 11th Avenue Jefferson Street, between 10th Avenue and 11th Avenue Monroe Street, between 10th Avenue and 11th Avenue These streets are proposed to be improved by bituminous overlay. The Engineer's estimate for these improvements is $78,600.00. The proposed overlay on 11th Avenue will tie in with the 11th Avenue Storm Sewer Lateral Project No. 1994-6, the contract of which was awarded by City Council on May 17, 1994. The storm sewer contractor has been instructed to patch 11th Avenue in anticipation of an overlay this year. The overlay work was not included in the storm sewer project, but rather combined with other streets for overlay in order to receive more competitive prices. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 4021. 2. Deny Resolution No. 4021. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4021, A Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for the 1994 Pavement Preservation Program, Project No. 1994-12 and move its adoption. DEH/pmp MEM4021 RESOLUTION NO. 4021 A Resolution Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Advertisement For Bids For The 1994 Pavement Preservation Program Project No. 1994-12 WHEREAS, David E. Hutton. Public Works Director has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of 11th Avenue, between Tyler Street and County Road 15; Madison Street, between 10th Avenue and 11th Avenue; Jefferson Street, between 10th Avenue and 11th Avenue; and Monroe Street, between 10th Avenue and 11th Avenue by pavement overlay and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file and of record in the Office of the City Engineer, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The .Advertisement for Bids shall be published as required by law. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of . 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Public Works Parking Lot DATE: June 15, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 4027 which accepts the bids and awards the contract for the Public Works Parking Lot Project. BACKGROUND: On April 19, 1994 the City Council authorized the advertisement for bids for the Public Works Parking Lot Project. This project consists of paving the existing gravel portions of the parking lot and reconstructing some of the existing paved surfaces. The project will be jointly funded 50% each by the City and Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (SPUC) because the parking lot is utilized by both entities. On June 8, 1994 bids were received and publicly opened for this project. A total of four bids were received and are summarized in the attached resolution. The low bid was submitted by Northwest Asphalt of Shakopee, MN for a total bid of$241,799.20. The Engineer's estimate for this project was approximately $200,000.00. In reviewing the bid, a large majority of the higher costs that were bid was for the common excavation bid item. The specifications indicated that the Contractor was responsible for disposal of all common excavation which may have had an impact on the unit price bid for this item. City staff will be contacting the Contractor to propose that there might be a disposal site for excess material on City property, namely by the proposed Community Center, which may in fact reduce this unit price substantially. If the Contractor is agreeable to that, the City can possibly negotiate a reduced price for this bid item through a change order which would reduce the total project costs somewhat. City staff has contacted the Shakopee Public Utilities Manager to discuss the bids with him. The Utilities Manager has indicated that SPUC is still willing to pay for their 50% of the project even though the bids were higher than estimated. The full Commission has not reviewed the bids yet but the Utilities Manager indicated that the Commission and City Council are both working on good faith estimates at this point and the general concept of the 50% split is still agreeable to Shakopee Public Utilities Commission's staff. The Engineering Department has reviewed all bids for completeness and also the qualifications of the low bidder, Northwest Asphalt, and has determined that they are able to perform the work as designed by the plans and specifications. Attached is Resolution No. 4027, which awards the bids on this project. Staff is also requesting a contingency equal to 10% of the bid for use by the City Engineer to cover any minor change orders or final quantity adjustments that may occur during this project. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Accept the low bid and adopt Resolution No. 4027. 2. Reject all bids and rebid. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Offer Resolution No. 4027, A Resolution Accepting Bids on the Public Works Parking Lot Improvements, Project No. 1994-9 and move its adoption. 2. Approve a contingency fund in the amount of 10% of the bid for use by the City Engineer in authorizing change orders or quantity adjustments on this project. DEH/pmp MEM4027 RESOLUTION NO. 4027 A Resolution Accepting Bids On The Public Works Parking Lot Improvements Project No. 1994-9 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Public Works Parking Lot Improvements, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $241,799.20 Hardrives, Inc. $259,986.50 Master Asphalt Company $260,864.65 Barber Construction $309,447.50 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Northwest Asphalt, Inc., 1451 County Road 18, Shakopee, MN 55379 is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. The appropriate City officials are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Northwest Asphalt, Inc. in the name of the City of Shakopee for the Public Works Parking Lot Improvements by pavement, curb and gutter, and storm sewer according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney 1Ycl MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer JH/j SUBJECT: Alley in Block 51, Original Shakopee Plat DATE: June 14, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 4028, a resolution receiving a report and calling a public hearing on the improvement of the alley in Block 51, Original Shakopee Plat. The public hearing is scheduled for July 19, 1994. BACKGROUND: On May 3, 1994 the City Council of Shakopee adopted a resolution declaring adequacy of the petition to pave the alley and ordering the preparation of a feasibility report. The feasibility report has been completed and is attached for Council review. The report recommends paving the alley and assessing the improvement 100% to the property owners of Block 51 on a front foot basis. The petition requesting the improvement and waiving the property owner's right to appeal assessments was signed by eight out of nine property owners in Block 51. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 4028. 2. Deny Resolution No. 4028. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 4028, A Resolution Receiving a Report and Calling a Hearing on an Improvement to the Alley in Block 51, Original Shakopee Plat, Project No. 1994-14 and move its adoption. DEH/pmp MEM4028 RESOLUTION NO. 4028 A Resolution Receiving A Report And Calling A Hearing On An Improvement To The Alley In Block 51 Original Shakopee Plat Project No. 1994-14 WHEREAS,pursuant to Resolution No. 3992 of the City Council adopted May 3, 1994, a report has been prepared by the City Engineer, with reference to the improvement of the alley in Block 51, Original Shakopee Plat by pavement, and this report was received by the Council on June 21, 1994. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of the alley in Block 51, Original Shakopee Plat in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting and benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of$6,050.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 19th day of July, 1994, at 7:30 P.M. or thereafter, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, at 129 South Holmes Street, Shakopee, Minnesota, and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. 3. The work of this project is hereby designated as part of the 1994-14 Public Improvement Program. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk ICI CI I Approved as to form: 1� l \t1,6/%); eiyAlla9 City Attorney 14, Nom' Pt FEASIBILITY FOR THE ALLEY IN BLOCK 51 CITY OF SHAKOPEE I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my _ direct supervision and that I am a duly Register• 3 Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 1116\_ Date 6—/06.`Y," Registration No. 19133. JUNE 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE NO. Introduction1 Background1 Proposed Improvements . 1 Estimated Costs . 1 Assessments and Funding 2 Conclusions2 INTRODUCTION On May 3, 1994 the City Council of Shakopee received a petition to pave the alley in Block 51, Original Shakopee Plat. The petition was declared adequate and the preparation of a feasibility report was ordered. The alley in Block 51 is rounded by 3rd Avenue, 4th Avenue, Sommerville Street and Spencer Street. BACKGROUND The existing alley in Block 51 has a gravel surface 10 - 12 feet wide, and is located within the 16 feet of right-of-way. The alley has positive drainage to the east (toward Spencer Street), and there does not appear to be any drainage problems on the adjacent properties. There are concrete aprons and sidewalk on each end of the alley, which are in good condition. The alley in Block 51 is signed as handicap accessible, and one resident on the block does use a wheel chair. The existing gravel surface is difficult to cross with a wheel chair. Paving the alley will help to improve handicap access to the adjacent properties. The petition was signed by eight out of nine property owners. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The petition received by the City requested that the alley in Block 51 be paved. This report recommends paving the alley with 2 inches of bituminous wear course on top of 6 inches of Class 5 aggregate base. Per Shakopee Standard Detail, an inverted crown is recommended which will convey storm runoff to Spencer Street where it will enter the storm sewer system at the corner _ of Spencer Street and 3rd Avenue. The existing concrete aprons and sidewalks are proposed to remain intact. COST ESTIMATE The estimated costs for the proposed improvements are included in the Appendix and are summarized below: Construction Total $4,400.00 Plus 10% Contingency $ 440.00 Subtotal $4,840.00 Plus 25% Engr./Admin. $1,210.00 — Grand Total $6,050.00 1 - ASSESSMENTS AND FUNDING The current Special Assessment Policy allows for assessing alley reconstruction 100% to the abutting property owners. Since all the lots on this block are not identical. this report recommends assessing on a front foot basis along the alley. The estimated assessment rate is $9.63 per front foot. CONCLUSION This report finds that the improvement of the alley in Block 51 by paving is desired by the residents of Block 51 and that such construction is feasible. 2 APPENDIX Project Location . 1 Project Cost Estimate . 2 Assessment Roll 3 Petition for Improvement . . 4 - 5 ALLEY IN BLOCK 51 v" ' , PARK N �,,��� P R O J01111111110111KTI C AO _tYp 'tetQ% D '1:til ell 1r i82M .,aSW04 4ttt�� � HUB£RARK �� �y-.��� / 2 t°t TagSetSig ligi �,���__, :4`t�'Dl,���l ,�tJ Wed1��D i! �- ' rQQ ©tdt4Q��e�o _ '.��� �(:ii1� 111 � � 4444 tttp 4444 _.� 4444111/ 5110 4�i444 ©40 a 41 ° p 1tQ44 4 01111 �. ptppp 4/ r � WI � °4pt�►�4 441 ©4444 � _ .1+11 r�pQ44 Q�i4= 441 Ao 44 lea ��1�01 4 Q`pItost� � � 1�ii� 4ttQ� ©t - 44� Stitt 1t��o �,td �� ti �4p soot* , ®41 414 44:- 4611 04 11110 �` °111t11�tp - 1ia OS 4t�40 tt14111��� Ip WO '��1Z10 lata e �4 4tttQ1 111i�� 411 �� ��=T.� WIwe 41444 � i 144 � °4444 - '- 140 Y tstratt1 �� �4114° �E Wore 2 �A wsnrw 4t�4� 41110Q'� �0 1 s 3fl� n 58st� ENS wm41��� �, e Q4414 444 . Sia■■1e A 9tE40 �� �� �1!! 0��10 309 �� !4144 1 °444© 74 1 N __ • p °t°t© ° to 41114 ° 161 °144 41444 Q41 OS11"1 0; li f303 . ; At4 41414 tt4©�' 1 � : .:: `303 � 3.0 414 . 4 ts'�4 „tp 4111 �._. .p�illl � f I 4 ttl °4°4 '4e44 4°� gip© •�• 4440 es 1 gire •Q44 � ��� ae____, , 3, . 114 II IP © Do© �,©� . 5 rids lit la I,,, I,:5 1 4 1 i: 7141 L, . . a K0P[E } 1 1 I .,===... 7 6 5 7 3 2 _,„. ■ ■ N f W r . 3�_ ■ W , 2 T U ■ d --= I 1R 6(I ,i bl . ASI C �. 10 H t. G ' u o -3 MI Its ■ vs os mai -is m- 1■ ■ i7 SHAKOP£E in i1 mum ,. —- �� -- ALLEY IN BLOCK 51 COST ESTIMATE ITEM UNIT TOTAL — NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY COST COST 1 Common Excavation C.Y. 120 $5.00 $600.00 2 Class V Aggregate Base TON 150 $6.00 $900.00 100% Crushed 3 Type 2341 Wear TON 50 $30.00 $1,500.00 4 Bituminous Patching TON 20 $40.00 $800.00 5 Sod S.Y. 200 $3.00 $600.00 Construction Total $4,400.00 Plus 10% Contingency $440.00 Subtotal $4,840.00 Plus 25% Engr./Admin. Fees $1,210.00 GRAND TOTAL $6,050.00 2 ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT ROLL ALLEY IN BLOCK 51 Prepared by ,..,.%--7,-/„...,/ May 1994 Checked by2i LEGAL l FRONT I TOTAL PID # OWNER DESCRIPTION FOOT j ASSESSMENT 27-001369-0 Robert H & April K Nead 'Lot 1 Blk 51 I 60.00 ' S577.50 303 E 4th Ave Original Shakopee Plat Shakopee, MN 55379 27-001370-0 Dennis D Anderson Lot 2 Blk 51 60.00 S577.50 313 E 4th Ave Original Shakopee Plat Shakopee, MN 55379 27-001371-0 Anthony & Cathy Christensen Lot 3 Blk 51 60.00 $577.50 321 E 4th Ave Original Shakopee Plat _ Shakopee, MN 55379 27-001372-0 Ethel E Hirscher Lot 4 Blk 51 60.00 S577.50 1329 E 4th Ave Original Shakopee Plat _ Shakopee, MN 55379 27-001373-0 Daniel E & Gwen Ballinger Lot 5 Blk 51 60.00 , S577.50 337 E 4th Ave Original Shakopee Plat Shakopee, MN 55379 127-001374-0 Brett D & Carol A Erath Lot 6 Blk 51 60.00 5577.50 300 S Spencer St Original Shakopee Plat Shakopee, MN 55379 '27-001374-1 Kenneth W & Mary E Kewatt Lot 7 Blk 51 60.00 S577.50 328 E 3rd Ave Original Shakopee Plat _ Shakopee, MN 55379 :27-001375-0 Richard A Beckrich &Wife Lot 10 Blk 51 &W6' of S38' 66.00 S635.25 304 E 3rd Ave of Lot 9 Blk 51 _ Shakopee, MN 55379 Original Shakopee Plat — 27-001376-0 Roger & Dolores Marschall Lots 8 & 9 Blk 51 ex W6' of 114.00 $1 ,097.25 314 E 3rd Ave S38' of Lot 9 Shakopee, MN 55379 Original Shakopee Plat TOTAL 600.00 $5,775.00 Total Assessment = $5,775.00 Assessment per Front Foot = $9.63 3 CITY OF SHAKOPEE PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT (100% OF PROPERTY OWNERS) To the City Council of Shakopee. Minnesota: We, all owners of real property abutting on the Alley, between 3rd Avenue and 4th Avenue, Sommerville Street and Spencer Street hereby petition that such Alley is improved by paving pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Signature of Owner Description of Property 1. 5 .,//2.27((�. `����2� Lot 7 , Blk . 51 Lot 6 , Blk . 51 3. , �/�v, �y -Ze Lot 5 , B1k . 51 %y/7_,.1 j4 Blk . 51 4. y/i44 _A2-.4 " Lo t , 5. -.V70."7 ,{',064-4 Lot 2 , Blk . 51 6. ---/e--2'1-41 Lot 3 , Blk . 51 7. (i) LOT 10 & W 6 ' of So . 38 ' of 9 , Blk. 51 8. o, Lot 1 , Blk . 51 9. 10. (Attach more pages if necessary) aS� - _ Circulator Examined, checked, and found to be in proper form and to be signed by the required number of owners of property affected by the making of the improvement petitioned for. City Clerk 4 Agreement of Assessment and Waiver of Irregularity and Appeal. THIS AGREEMENT. is made this 26th day of April, 1994. between the City of Shakopee, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the City and residents of Block 51 of Scott County, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as property owners. In consideration of the action of the City Council, at the owner's request, to cause the construction of a paved alley between 3rd Avenue and 4th Avenue, Sommerville Street and Spencer Street, and to assess 100% of the cost of said construction to the property owners. Owners agree to pay such costs, as may be determined by the Council of the City to be a fair apportionment of the costs of said improvement. Owners expressly waive objection to any irregularity with regard to the said improvement assessments and any claim that the amount thereof levied against owner's property is excessive,together with all right to appeal in the courts. In testimony, whereof, , has hereunto set his hand, the day and year first above written. In presence of: - - _ 5 i i i i i i i 1 i 1 i 1 1 15 �, MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SUBJECT: Parkview 1st Addition - Accepting Public Improvements and Releasing Escrow and Payment Agreement DATE: June 17, 1994 INTRODUCTION: Mr. Dale Dahlke has asked that his escrow and payment agreement for Parkview 1st Addition be released. BACKGROUND: When Mr. Dahlke platted Parkview 1st Addition he entered into a developers agreement which provided that he would install public improvements. In order to insure their construction he entered into a escrow and payment agreement with a bank (Escrow Agent) and the City and deposited money with the Escrow Agent to cover the estimated cost of the improvements. The improvements have been completed and Mr. Dahlke has provided the City with the required one year maintenance bond. (A small amount of sidewalk has not been complete. Mr. Dahlke desires to wait to install this part of the sidewalk until commercial development occurs. He is submitting a letter of credit for this work. The developers agreement will not be released against these lots until the sidewalk is installed. ) Before the Escrow Agent can reimburse to Mr. Dahlke the amount on deposit remaining (the amount deposited is 125% times the estimated cost of the improvements) , the Agreement requires the City to adopt a resolution accepting the improvements. The attached resolution accepts the public improvements and authorizes the release of the escrow and payment agreement. There are a few additional plats which will require similar action by the City Council. Staff will bring them to Council as needed. Staff proposes to amend the standard escrow and payment agreement for new plats, unless Council directs otherwise. The amendment will allow acceptance of the completed improvements by the City Engineer versus a resolution adopted by City Council. This will eliminate the need for Council action on this administrative task and will be consistent with the current practice by the City Engineer who accepts public improvements prior to the release of developers agreements. ALTERNATIVES: 1] Accept the public improvements for Parkview 1st Addition 2] Do not accept the public improvements 3] Table the request RECOMMENDED ACTION: Offer Resolution No. 4033 , A Resolution Accepting Public Improvements for Parkview 1st Addition, and move its adoption. RESOLUTION NO. 4033 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARKVIEW FIRST ADDITION WHEREAS, on June 15, 1993, City Council adopted Resolution No. 3810, approving the final plat of Parkview First Addition; and WHEREAS, on July 14, 1993, the developer of Parkview First Addition and the City of Shakopee entered into a developers agreement insuring the developers construction of required public improvements; and WHEREAS, on July 14, 1993 , the developer of Parkview First Addition, the City of Shakopee and Citizens State Bank of Shakopee entered into an escrow and payment agreement which provided for funds for construction of the required public improvements; and WHEREAS, the escrow and payment agreement requires that the City accept the conpleted improvements by resolution; and WHEREAS, the public improvements have been constructed by the developer and inspected and approved by the City Engineer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the public improvements for Parkview First Addition are hereby accepted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk is hereby authorized and directed to release the said Escrow and Payment Agreement on file with the Scott County Recorder. Adopted in adjourned regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this 21st day of June. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to for-, , City Attorney