Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/04/1994 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items DATE: December 30, 1993 1 . Attached are the December 2nd, 9th, and 16th, 1993 minutes of the Planning Commission and the December 9th, 1993 Board of Adjustment and Appeals minutes . 2 . Attached are the January 6, 1994 agendas for the Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment & Appeals meetings . 3 . Attached is a News Release from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission regarding the MWCC Releasing the Chief Administrator. 4 . Attached is information regarding the 1994 Conference for Newly Elected Officials and Seminars for Elected Officials . If you are interested in attending, please contact Toni to be registered. 5 . Attached is the January Business Update from City Hall . 6 . Attached is the January calendar of Upcoming Meetings . 7 . Attached is the Police Newsletter for Council review. 8 . Attached is the monthly report from the Planning Department . 9 . Attached is the monthly report from the Engineering Department . 10 . Attached is the monthly report from the Community Services Department . OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE PLANNING COMMISSION Special Session Shakopee, Minnesota December 2, 1993 MEMBERS PRESENT: Joos, Spurrier, Kelly, Madigan MEMBERS ABSENT: Mars, Christensen, Zak STAFF PRESENT: Lindberg Ekola, City Planner Karen Marty, City Attorney Lisa Anderson, Recording Secretary IROLL CALL Chrmn. Joos called the meeting to order at 6: 07 p.m. Roll call was taken as noted above. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. III. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 11, LAND USE REGULATION (ZONING) OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY CODE. Chrmn. Joos opened the public hearing to consider amendments to the Shakopee City Code. SIGN REGULATIONS: The City Planner pointed out that the sign regulations was last updated in 1988-89 . The City Attorney stated that staff recommended deleting paragraphs 5 and 6 on page 2 and 3 . These changes have been changed to the Ideological and Non-Commercial Signs section. This change is to avoid legal action provisions:- Comm. Zak arrived at 6: 14 p.m. Comm. Spurrier stated a concern that some temporary signs obstruct view of the right-of-way traffic. He would like to see something specifically stated in the ordinance dealing with temporary signs. The City Attorney responded that signs are prohibited in the public right- of-way other than signs put there by the government. She also stated that staff is recommending that political signs not be allowed in the public right-of-way anymore than any other non-governmental sign. Comm. Spurrier asked what class of signs real estate signs are categorized under and if they are prohibited also. The City Attorney stated that the real estate signs right-of-way. Comm.allowed in any residential zone asked public whether there Minutes of the Page- 2 Shakopee Planning Commission December 2, 1993 was a time frame on these signs. The City Attorney responded that the signs have to be removed shortly after the event has taken place, but they can go up any time prior to the event. Chrmn. Joos recognized anyone in the audience wishing to comment on this matter. Jon Albinson, 5240 Valley Industrial Boulevard, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the podium. He asked whether, billboards was included in Subd. 2-Al. Comm. Mars arrived at 6:19 p.m. The City Attorney responded that the billboards that were put up prior to the last ordinance are legal but anything put up after that will have to be taken down. The City Planner pointed out that paragraph 4, on page 12, allows for area identifications signs to be placed at each driveway into a public street. The City Attorney read the definition for area 'identification signs. • Mr. Albinson suggested changing the wording "for each driveway" to "for each street" . The City Attorney agreed with that suggestion. Bob Sweeney, 506 Holmes, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the podium. He clarified what Mr. Albinson was suggesting. It was the consensus from the Commission to change the wording for paragraph 4 on page 12 to read "for each entrance" instead of "for each driveway" . °..i* "" Comm..1.Spurr.iery,asked if there..was a. legal non-conforming, sign, how long could it stay there and-what happens' to cause the removal. The City Attorney responded that legal non-conforming signs can stay until it needs structural changes. Jon Albinson, 5240 Valley Industrial Boulevard, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the podium. He stated a concern that on page 11, Subd. Dl, Wall Signs, the square footage for which a sign is mounted is too small. Bob Sweeney suggested adding a sentence that refers to multiple tenant buildings and tie it into the space occupied by the tenant of the building. The City Attorney stated that these provisions do exist in the B-1 zone on Page 6, paragraph B1, however they do not exist in the multi-tenant buildings and any other zone because at the time the original ordinance was drafted, this was not common. She clarified that the one hundred square feet was limited per tenant in the B-1 and B-2 zones. She suggested moving that language to the I-1 and I-2 zones. - 3 Page Minutes of the Decembpa 1993 Shakopee Planning Commission Comm. Zak suggested that more information be gathered regarding this. He suggested looking at what other suburbs have done. He would like to see the signs all be one standard size and be consistent throughout the community. Chrmn. Joos agreed to having conformity of all the signs. Comm. Mars suggested adding another paragraph on multiple tenants to offer some uniformity and one sign for each business. Jon Albinson stated that he agrees with staff to expand. the B-1 and B-2 zones into an I-1 and I-2 zone. The City Planner pointed out that you need a larger sign for larger buildings in order to look good. He suggested maybe it should be changed to something like not to exceed 30 or 50 square feet. Chrmn. Joos asked the staff to come back with more information regarding this matter. Motion: Comm. Zak/Spurrier offered a motion to adopt the sign ordinance as written with provisions to be added later by staff on percentage of square footage and other sign considerations. Vote: Motion carried unanimously: - OVERLAY DISTRICTS: The City Planner stated that there are four overlay districts: Planned Unit Development Overlay, Mineral Extraction Overlay, Shoreland Overlay, and Floodplain Overlay. He gave a brief overview of the recommendations from ZORC. The City Attorney pointed out staff's recommendations. She stated that page 92 through 96 has not been deleted but instead moved to the Administrative Provisions. She stated that each of these districts should say what they are and what they allow. Bob Sweeney suggested that with respect to the PUD, some wording should be added emphasizing the flexibility available to staff in negotiating trade-offs within the 20 percent open space requirement. The City Planner stated that it is important to distinguish between what is park land and what is open space. He clarified that open space is intended for residents of that PUD, and park land is intended for the public as a whole. He pointed out that park land and open space are not the sane. Minutes of the Page- 4 Shakopee Planning Commission December 2, 1993 Comm. Spurrier asked for the definition of open space. The City Attorney stated that that was not one of the defined words, but would get that definition if that was desirable. Comm. Kelly pointed out that there is nothing in here regarding traffic development. The City Planner responded that requiring a traffic analysis would be a good idea. Chrmn. Joos suggested that school district boundaries also be incorporated in this section. Comm. Spurrier stated that he feels the development portion belongs in the subdivision regulations and not in this section. Comm. Kelly would like to see it left optional on the subdivision provision, but made mandatory in the PUD process. The City Planner stated he agreed with Comm. Spurrier's comment to keep the different provisions separate. Motion: Comm. Spurrier/Madigan move to advance this language. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. MINERAL EXTRACTION DISTRICT: The City Attorney pointed out that this is a new zone. She stated that the intention is to allow mining only as a rezoning as opposed to allowing it within the zoning district. She gave a brief overview of the staff recommendations. She pointed out that the title has been changed from Mineral Extraction to Mining. She also pointed out changes on pages 99 and 100 . The City Attorney suggested adoption of the staff recommendations and she would have the rest of the changes at the next meeting. Chrmn. Joos suggested that on page 99, item G, the words "when adjoining residential areas" be added. Comm. Spurrier suggested that a 2 foot contour interval be added to the plan submittal requirements in this section. He feels there should be a provision for a bond to reclaim the property. The City Attorney responded that as an overlay district it is allowed to be put in place in any location of the city. Bob Sweeney pointed out that ZORC suggested this be limited to the I-2 District. Mina Page- 5 of the Page- g, 5 Shakopee Planning Commission 3 Chrmn. Joos pointed out that on page 98 Subd. 6A, this was changed to five hundred feet and stated that he feels if it is lowered, he would like to see it read, "land owners" within five hundred feet. Comm. Spurrier stated he would like to incorporate soil and geological concerns into this also. Comm. Zak asked for clarification of the difference between spot zoning and an overlay district. The City Planner and the City Attorney provided a brief description of the difference between the two terms. Chrmn. Joos recognized anyone from the audience wishing to speak regarding this matter. John Voss, Planning Consultant, 7300 West 147th Street, Apple Valley, AVR, Inc. , approached the podium. He stated that he feels having an overlay district is a good idea because it incorporates the comprehensive planning process into the mining approval process. Mr. Voss also requested clarification of the word "mining" . The City Attorney read the definition for mining and explained what was meant by stock piling. Mr. Voss also commented on Subd. 5-B regarding the 500 foot provision. He stated that it could be difficult to get permission from an adjacent land owner to mine that close and recommended that the 500 foot provision be changed to 600 feet. Mr. Voss also pointed out that the only place a ready mix plant is allowed is by a conditional use permit and in an I-2 , Heavy Industrial district. He stated that this may cause some problems and advised that the Planning Commission reconsider this proposal. Mr. Voss handed out and read to the Planning Commission a proposal to add two different provisions which is marked as "Exhibit A" . Jon Albinson stated the intent of ZORC was to minimize the number of mineral extraction areas we have in the City of Shakopee. He also stated that he doesn't agree with Mr. Voss's rationale. Bob Sweeney explained why ZORC recommended mineral extraction not having a conditional use in the agricultural zone and why ZORC limited it to the I-2 Zone. Comm. Mars asked for clarification of what was meant by a screening barrier and how high they needed to be as stated in Subd. 6 B. The City Attorney stated that the Minutes of the Page- 6 Shakopee Planning Commission limber 2, 1993 height and width is not specified in the provision and suggested that that be added. Motion: Comm. Spurrier/Madigan offered a motion to accept the sections that were reviewed, absent the exceptions that are going to be reworked by Staff. Comm. Mars clarified that this motion is accepted as an overlay only in the I-2 District. It does not approve any portable ready mix plant. Vote: Motion carried five to one with Comm. Mars voting against. IV. OTHER BUSINESS Comm. Spurrier offered a motion to continue the public hearing to December 16, 1993, at 6:00 p.m. V. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8: 35 p.m. SHAKOPEE 12-2-93 Mineral Extraction Overlay District Proposal to add the following: Subdivision 3 Conditional Uses c) Portable concrete ready mix b Subdivision 7 Development Standards i) Portable ready mix shall utilize aggregate mined on the site, shall only exist as an interim use while aggregate is available and shall be discontinued thereafter or when the overlay district is removed, whichever shall occur first. j) Portable ready mix shall only be permitted where the operation has direct access to a County Road or State Highway and shall not take direct access to a local street. k) Portable ready mix shall be located a minimum distance of 600 ft. from the nearest residence and shall be completely screened from public view except for an enclosed tower. I) Portable ready mix shall be accessory to the mineral extraction on the site and shall be limited to a maximum of ten (10) ready mix trucks and any other C.U.P. conditions which the City may establish to protect the health, safety and welfare on adjacent properties. Reasons for Reouest: r . Hauling Aggregate material can be processed on site rather than transported to an Industrial District. 2. Trio Reduction 30 ready mix loads would require 20 loads of aggregate material from mining site to processing site. 3. Noise and Screening There is an ability to recess the ready mix area on a mining site and reduce noise and provide a visual screen. 4. More Rapid Use of Deposits Ready mix on a mining site (interim use) may accelerate the mining process because of demand for aggregate. 5. Interim Use Ready mix would exist as a temporary/interim use only during the life of mineral extraction and•overlay zoning. It would be removed and not interfere with ultimate/end use. 6. City Control City controls ready mix use by overlay zoning, which is temporary, and by C.U.P. process and any conditions attached thereto. 7. Respond to Growth This interim C.U.P. process makes ready mix available to a rapid growth area during the term of rapid growth and is removed thereafter. OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 9, 1993 MEMBERS PRESENT: Joos, Madigan, Kelly, Zak, Christensen MEMBERS ABSENT: Mars, Spurrier (arrived later) STAFF PRESENT: Lindberg Ekola, City Planner Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant Planner Dave Hutton, City Engineer Amy Wicklund, Planning Intern Debra Zabel, Recording Secretary ROLL CALL Chrmn. Joos called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. Roll call was taken as noted above. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. III. APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 4, 9 & 18, 1993 MEETING MINUTES The minutes were approved as presented. IV. RECOGNITION OF INTERESTED CITIZENS Chrmn. Joos recognized anyone in the audience wishing to speak on any item not on the agenda. There was no response. V. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Motion: Comm. Zak/Kelly offered a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. VI. OTHER BUSINESS A. OFFICIAL MAPPING/LAND ACQUISITION Motion: Comm. Christensen/Zak moved to table the item for further review. Vote: Motion carried unanimously with Comm. Spurrier not voting due to his absence. B. LAND ACQUISITION - WATER STORAGE FACILITY The City Planner explained to the Commission that his item had been tabled for further review. The proposed Minutes of the Page- 2 Shakopee Planning Commission December 9, 1993 water storage facility is proposed to be located on Lot 1, Block 1, Maple Trails Estates 1st Addition. He stated that the elevations identified would be appropriate for this operation and a gravity system would be essential. He stated that staff is recommending finding the proposed land acquisition in compliance with the comprehensive plan, and to recommend this to the City Council. Comm. Christensen inquired that if this plan is in compliance and is adopted, would it not be differing from the new ordinance that is being planned and what changes would come from that. The City Planner explained that the Utilities Commission has been working on utility structure height and some type of ground storage, but no final recommendation has been reached. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Madigan offered a motion which finds the proposed land acquisition of Lot ' l, Block 1, Maple Trails Estates 1st Addition for the proposed water storage facility in compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. ' VII. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 376 FOR MINERAL EXTRACTION AND LAND REHABILITATION, ORIGINALLY ISSUED TO NBZ ENTERPRISES, UPON THE PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF CR 83, SOUTH OF CR 16 AND NORTH OF VALLEY VIEW RD. The City Planner explained that Fischer Aggregates, Inc. submitted applications for amending a Conditional Use Permit and a Mineral Extraction and Land Rehabilitation Permit for the mining operation located south of CR 16 and west of CR 83 . He stated that in 1988 the City Council granted Scott County Lumber Company a permit for mineral extraction and land rehabilitation on property located in the Agricultural Zoning District. The applicants recently held an informational meeting with the neighbors. He stated that the application includes expanding the site to include five acres, increasing mining depth, side slopes and extending the hours of operation. John Voss, Planning Consultant for Urban Planning and Design, explained the basics of what they were requesting and referred to a 40-page manual they had distributed to the Commission. Liza Robson, Fischer Aggregates, Inc. , 5823 Pilot Knob Road, Apple Valley, and Peter Fischer, 23795 Pennock Avenue, Apple Valley, introduced themselves to the Minutes of the Page- 3 Shakopee Planning Commission December 9, 1993 Commission. Peter explained that Liza and himself are the owners of this mining operation. He stated that their families have owned a similar operation in Apple Valley for about 40 years and also own nine concrete plants in the Metropolitan area. Liza Robson stated that on November 23, 1993, they conducted a meeting with the neighborhood and 12 people were in attendance. She explained that they requested the City Planner to go ahead with the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAS) . Kirsten Rowina, Geologist, explained that the plans that have already been approved consist of mining in three phases and each would be surrounded on all sides by approximately a 20 foot embankment. The reason for this being there is an 8 inch gas pipe line that runs through the northern portion of the property. One request would be to ask for a relocation of that pipe line as well as purchasing the Rutt property and eliminating the driveway. easement. Ms. Rogina stated that the proposed plan would be to mine 20 to 40 feet below the existing grade instead of the 12 to 20 feet now in effect. She stated the site life is now expected to be 20 years, and that there would• be more product taken out, but at a faster rate. Ms. Rowina explained that the mining would be limited to ten feet above the bedrock so when the property is developed the installation of utilities would be feasible. She stated for controlling dust generation, they would pave the first 150 feet of the access and the rest would be watered a on daily basis during the mining season. There would also be eight foot high screening berms around the active phases to reduce dust. Reclamation would start in phase one by grading the site and spreading 3 inches of top soil over the area and planting seed for vegetation to minimize erosion. She stated the Pollution Control Agency was involved for an air emissions permit and storm water discharge permits. Comm. Christensen asked about the reclamation and what the property would be used for after the mining is complete. Ms. Rowina stated that moving the pipe line would not affect reclamation. She stated that if the pipe line was kept where it is, that portion could not be mined. Chrmn. Joos asked about the City requirement of more than three inches of topsoil. Jim Benshof, Traffic Engineer, 7301 Holmes, Edina, commented on the traffic review that was performed. He projected that daily traffic generated would be 245 . bines of the Page- 4 Shakopee Punning Cammoa December 9, 1993 However, adding the ready mix operation traffic, it would be 305 daily trips. These volumes are shown for peak hours of the day. He stated that the mining operations would be closed from December to March. He stated that traffic would operate at service level B, gravel traffic expected to be 160 from the North on CR 83 and 145 to the South. He stated the driveway would remain, but would be improved; a right turn lane accommodates the driveway, an acceleration taper lane to the south, and a bypass lane for northbound traffic. Chrmn. Joos commented that with the trucks turning into the driveway and slowing down, what the possibility of accidents would be. He commented that possibly a signal would be appropriate. Comm. Christensen asked whether the traffic study accounted for Mystic Lake traffic and Canterbury traffic also. She commented that the left turn onto CR 83 going south would be a hazard since there is no cessation of traffic at that point, and the time constraints of the truck driver. Jim Benshof stated that the traffic count was done in 1992 when the track was open. Peter Fischer explained the tractors and trailers are 40 feet, or the size of a dump truck. Comm. Zak stated that if Canterbury reopened the traffic would be heavier and also the 1992 report would not include Dakota Country at Mystic Lake. The City Engineer explained that the County has done a traffic signal warrant study at CR 16 and CR 83 and a signal will be installed but he was not aware of the time frame. He suggested that the Commission compare the past truck traffic to what is being proposed. John Voss commented that they are requesting to have the operational hours to be from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. He stated this property would be interim use of the MUSA line in 2010. Todd Bradoe, neighbor of the gravel pit, commented that he had not heard of the proposals until this meeting. He was concerned about the where the water was going to come from to have a wash house for the trucks and to water the driveway daily. He stated that traffic on CR 83 is already bad and adding the trucks or a stop light would only make it worse. He stated that there are 40 foot holes on the property and he was concerned about the children in that area being around this environment. bin of thePage- 5 Shakopee Yfanning Commalson December 9, 1993 Ken Rutt, owner of parcel, stated that he would be selling his property to the mining company and would ask the Commission to include his ..five acre parcel in their,-. . review. Beverly Koehnen, 2036 Canterbury Road, wanted to know who owned NBZ. She stated that the company has already gone deeper than their permits allow. She felt the hours should not be extended and that the traffic .would only worsen. Kirsten Rowina, Geographer, stated there is a 300 foot well on the site at this time. The Department of Natural Resources requires a water appropriation permit and the effect on surrounding wells is being looked at. She stated that the slopes are steep and will get steeper after the berms are brought down and area is back filled. John Voss commented on the proposed finishing date would be 2005. He stated that vandalism issues were discussed. He stated that the company is concerned about liability issues and would do the best they could to keep children off the site. Liza Robson explained that herself and Peter Fischer did acquire interest in the gravel mine along with two other partners from the former NBZ operation. Comm. Zak asked to get more information about water contamination and pumping of water exceeding usage. Kirsten Rowina explained that the process introduces no chemicals and typically mining operations do not have a problem with contamination issues. She stated that the cement mixing part would not be part of the proposal unless the zoning ordinance was changed. Comm. Christensen landcoulded behe would u ed in like years information ground on how water issues, such as flooding. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Kelly offered a motion which accepts the applicant's request for a time extension until such time as the Zoning Ordinance update process is completed. Vote: Motion carried unanimously with Comm. Spurrier abstaining due to his absence during the discussion. Comm. Spurrier asked whether the applicant was encouraged by a City agent to amend this conditional use permit. Nffin tes of the Page- 6 Shakopee mag Commiccion December !, 1993 John Voss stated they were doing this on their own. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Zak moved to continue the public hearing to the January 6, 1994, meeting. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. There was a recess taken at 9: 05 p.m. VII. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: TO CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE EAGLE CREEK BLUFF ADDITION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED EAST OF CR 18 AND SOUTH OF BOILING SPRINGS LANE. The Assistant Planner explained this item was continued to this meeting to allow additional time for the applicant to address concerns of traffic, and water and sewer. She stated that staff is requesting further analysis from a regional perspective on the traffic volumes. The traffic projections are 45 percent to the east, 45 percent to the west and 10 percent to the north. She stated that the applicant has submitted a new plan with 80 foot right-of-way, but basically it's the same plan. She commented that staff felt the layout needs to be redesigned. She recommended that the public hearing be continued to the January 6, 1994, meeting. Dennis Griswold, Ryan Contracting in Burnsville, proposed an 80 foot wide right-of-way on Eagle Creek Bluff and stated that they would work with staff to determine the actual pavement width and design. He stated another change would be to put a sidewalk along Eagle Creek Bluff instead of connecting to the path which was proposed earlier. He stated they would be proposing a four foot wide wood chip pathway through the corridor to connect to the green space within Savage. He commented they would be connecting with a common water system. He explained the school district boundaries. He stated that the extension of Eagle Creek Bluff into Savage would be considered a residential collector street, this would allow lots to front this type of street, which would be 36 feet wide. Cnrmn. Joos stated his concern about traffic impact of the Savage development upon Shakopee. The City Planner explained that the City does not usually allow for residential single family homes fronting on ccllector streets. He stated these types of streets usually have an 80 foot wide right-of-way. ninths of the December Pag9,e 7 Page- - Shakopee planning Commission 1993 The City Engineer explained that this could be constructed as a four lane street at a later time. Chrmn. Joos commented that he would be opposed to having the houses front this type of street. Comm. Kelly stated concern that where Eagle Creek Bluff Avenue exists is not at a 90 degree angle, which may not be appropriate for collector streets. He asked whether there were any standards for horizontal curvature on these streets. The City Engineer stated there were standards and those would be covered in the final design. He stated that the applicants have not submitted a road design as of yet. Dennis Griswold explained the smallest lot is .86 of an acre. He stated that the traffic levels would be balanced out with the large amount of green space and the proposed park system. Mr. Hutton explained that the City has no intention of upgrading the existing Boiling Springs Lane, and installing curb and gutter at this time. He stated that the residents would need to petition for the upgrade and the City Council would need to approve it on the five year plan. Randy Sauer, 9401 Boiling Springs Lane, stated that he enjoyed the neighborhood as it was, stating there was no need for police calls since they were a close knit community who watched out for each other. He commented that they did not want the street to go through and connect with the new community moving in. Mark Gilbertson, 9326 Boiling Springs Lane, stated that he preferred the dead end street, which was also sufficient for emergency vehicles and busses. He would like for the area to remain a rural situation. Ken Platt, 8615 Boiling Springs Lane, commented he did not want any changes to occur. Terry Pribble, 8963 Boiling Springs Lane, also commented he did not want any changes to occur. Julie Dugan, 9177 Boiling Springs Lane, commented that their neighborhood is safe and did not want the further traffic. Ninths of the Page- 8 Shakopee Planning Commission December 9, 1993 John Pribble, 8963 Boiling Springs Lane, suggested that the developer make a few lots larger and have a cul-de- sac to create less traffic on the arterial streets. He commented that with the new roads going in they could have more assessments, curb and gutter, and sewer and water. The City Engineer explained where CR 18 would be extending and where TH 101 would be connecting. Bruce Gufford, 9130 Boiling Springs Lane, stated he wanted no change. Comm. Spurrier stated that the traffic report should have included the triangular portion of the junction where the two roads meet. The City Planner gave a brief presentation on the new highways, where they will connect, and the time frame for construction. He stated that Boiling Springs Lane is proposed to remain a local street. John Pribble, 8963 Boiling Springs Lane, stated concern that if the new road were put through, people would use this road as a short cut to the highways. Dennis Griswold stated that Savage's Planning Commission and Council has looked at the Section 18 study and were favorable towards it. He stated that all the proposed houses would not even be built before CR 18 was redone. He did not feel that traffic would route through the development to this street for a short cut. Clarence VanZee, President of VanZee Homes, stated that they own about 4, 000 pine trees on another property and would be bringing these in for screening. He asked the Commission to give him an idea of whether they supported the PUD or not. He stated the houses would be in the $200, 000 range. Chrmn. Joos stated he would support the PUD. Comm. Spurrier agreed with the PUD. Comm. Zak agreed with the PUD but did not feel there was an advantage to this property to have the street going through. Comm. Kelly liked the idea of the PUD, but thought it needed to be reworked. Comm. Madigan agreed with the PUD, but was concerned about traffic issues. Comm. Christensen liked the PUD, but did not want to disrupt the existing neighborhood. Minutes of the Page- 9 Shakopee Planning troimmission December 9, 1993 Motion: Comm. Christensen/Zak offered a motion to continue the public hearing regarding the Application for Approval of the Preliminary Development Plan for the proposed Eagle Creek Bluff Planned Unit development to the January 6, 1994, meeting. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Zak offered a motion to table the recommendation to the City Council regarding the Application for Approval of the Final Development Plan for the proposed Eagle Creek Bluff Planned Unit Development. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. VIII. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: TO CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EAGLE CREEK BLUFF ADDITION, LOCATED EAST OF CR 18 AND SOUTH OF BOILING SPRINGS LANE. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Zak offered a motion to continue the public hearing regarding the Application for Approval of the Preliminary Plat for the proposed Eagle Creek Bluff development to the January 6, 1994, meeting. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. ICATION IX. PUBLIC CONDITIONAL U E PERMIT• T TO ALLOW FILL TO CONSIDER AO BEL FOR PLACED IN AA FLOODWAY IN HUBER PARK Amy Wicklund, Planning Intern, stated that staff's recommendation would be to continue the public hearing to the January 6, 1994, meeting to allow time for further review by the Department of Natural Resources. Motion: Comm. Zak/Spurrier moved to continue the public hearing regarding the Application for a Conditional Use Permit to fill in a floodway to the February, 1994 meeting, or sooner if the DNR report arrives. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. X. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: TO CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PRAIRIE BEND, LYING ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EAST 4TH AVENUE, SOUTH AND WEST OF THE K.C. HALL The City Planner stated that the applicants are this erty to le requesting and that rtherenwas concern by the City Council family, il fy,, about this rezoning. nates of the Page-10 Shakopee Planning Connni lion December 9, 1993 Mr. Jim Johnston, 14 Warner Circle, Chaska, stated they have a new concept using the PUD with approximately 33 percent open space, and 30 percent of the single family homes were taken out of the plan. The garden apartments have been replaced with townhouses. North of 4th Avenue to screen the development from the industrial zone, they would propose one story four-plexes which would be used as assisted living spaces for seniors. Instead of having garages for these units, they would have community rooms. The plan would also include some single family and multi- family housing. He stated that there is a proposed site by Merrill Company that would provide access out of the single family housing area and would be compatible with this plan. He stated that the driveways to the townhomes would be privately maintained. Comm. Spurrier asked for an idea of the housing styles and what uses with the current zoning would be permitted in the areas created outside. The City Planner commented that this area is currently zoned R-4 and in the mandatory PUD area. He stated that this R-4 section does allow for single family housing as a permitted use. Mr. Johnston stated that this may not need to be rezoned. The only issue they would be concerned about would be the 50 foot set back. They would prefer to have a 30 foot setback. He asked to have their concept plan reviewed at the December meeting of the City Council. Chrmn. Joos stated he was impressed with the new plan. Comm. Christensen liked the new plan. Comm. Spurrier stated concern about buffering commercial and industrial uses to the green space. Bob Worthington, Merrill Realty, stated they would be coming in to discuss their plans with staff as soon as there is a consensus on the property being proposed by Sienna Corporation. Motion: Comm. Zak/Christensen offered a motion to continue the public hearing regarding the Application for Approval of the Preliminary Plat for the proposed Prairie Bend subdivision to the February 3, 1994 , meeting. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Nffimutes of thePage-11 ShakopeeCommission Planning December 9, 1993 XI. VACATION: TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF THE PORTION OF PIERCE ST. BETWEEN 3RD AVE. AND 4TH AVE. The City Engineer stated that the City Council referred this issue to the Planning Commission. He stated that the public hearing is set for January 4, 1994, to discuss the options. Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer, asked for a consensus on one of the options to bring to the City Council, and to review the chosen option to decide if it complies with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Nummer went over the five options explaining each. He stated there was a neighborhood meeting, but only two people were in attendance. These people stated they wanted to push the alley over to obtain more property. Mr. Hutton stated that the parties who were present at the meeting had previously violated driveway and building permits. The City is withholding their Certificate of Occupancy deposit until they meet the storm water plans and landscaping requirements. Comm. Spurrier stated he liked option 4 and would like another motion that would suggest that the City Council consider removing that part of Pierce from the vacation. Motion: Comm. Spurrier/Zak offered a motion to recommend that the City Council approve the vacation of Pierce Street from 3rd Avenue to 4th Avenue, while reserving utility easements. Motion: Comm. Spurrier/Christensen offered a motion to find the vacation of a portion of Pierce Street consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Comm. Spurrier/Madigan moved to send a recommendation to City Council that none of the right-of- way, west of center line be vacated until the property owner to the west brings their site into conformance with current building permits and conditional use permits. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. C. 1994 BOAA AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULE Motion: Motion approving the 1994 Meeting Schedule for the Planning Commission and the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Vote: Motion carried on the consent agenda. XIII. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 11: 50 p.m. OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE PLANNING COMMISSION Special Session Shakopee, Minnesota December 16, 1993 MEMBERS PRESENT: Joos, Madigan, Kelly, Zak MEMBERS ABSENT: Spurrier, Christensen, Mars STAFF PRESENT: Lindberg Ekola, City Planner Karen Marty, City Attorney Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner Lisa Anderson, Recording Secretary I. ROLL CALL Chrmn. Joos called the meeting to order at 6: 15 p.m. The roll call was taken as noted above. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The City Attorney suggested changing 3c of the agenda from the discussion regarding "Parking" to "Administration and Enforcement". The agenda was approved as amended. III. 6: 00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 11, LAND USE REGULATION OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY CODE. Chrmn. Joos opened the public hearing. The City Attorney stated that ZORC recommended that the Race Track District be eliminated because it is heating up again. She stated that staff is recommending that it be placed back in the ordinance. She stated that most of the changes are made to just clean up the language. Comm. Zak stated his concern with noise in the Racetrack District. The City Planner pointed out that there are noise restrictions for the different types of racing and the different times of the day the races occur. The City Attorney also stated that a PUD and any other use is going to be required to abide by performance standards. The City Attorney also stated that she would check into this matter more thoroughly. Motion: Comm. Zak/Kelly offered a motion to accept the Racetrack District, with the exception of Item B for clarification. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Minutes of the Page- 2, Shakopee Planning Commission December 16, 1993 SHORELAND REGULATIONS The City Attorney gave a brief summary of the staff recommendations. She stated that changes were made to keep things consistent with the other ordinances and to clean up the language. Comm. Madigan asked for clarification of the difference between the Shoreland and Flood Plain Regulations. Ron Beaty, 470 Pillsbury Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, approached the podium and stated the difference between the two regulations. Jon Albinson, 5240 Valley Industrial Boulevard, Shakopee, Minnesota, stated a concern regarding the 1000 foot setback for the Shoreland District. A lengthy discussion was had regarding this matter. Jon Albinson asked whether the City would consider adopting the previously approved line as the continuation of our Shoreland District line. The Planning Commission decided to discuss this matter later after receiving clarification from the DNR. Comm. Spurrier took his chair on the Planning Commission at 6: 57 p.m. Jon Albinson asked the Planning Commission to consider Subd. 7b, the minimum of three feet above the high water level be changed to one or two feet instead. The City Planner responded that this would need to be researched more thoroughly. Jon Albinson also asked the Planning Commission to consider in Subd. 6, Design Standards, to change the lot width from 125' to 100' . Motion: Comm. Kelly/Zak offered a motion to table this discussion regarding the Shoreland District until they received additional information. Vote: The motion carried unanimously. FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT The City Planner displayed a diagram of the Floodplain District and explained some definitions. The City Attorney stated that there were no major changes made to this district. Comm. Spurrier stated his concern that Valley Fair review Minutes of the Page- Shakopee Planning Commission December 16, 1993 and comment on these revisions and suggested that this discussion be postponed until Valley Fair has responded to this matter. Bob Sweeney, 506 South Holmes, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the podium and stated that he would not like this matter delayed. Motion: Comm. Kelly/Madigan offered a motion to accept the Floodplain Overlay District without delaying the process, but directed Staff to advise Valley Fair that the process is underway. Vote: Motion carried four to one, with Comm. Spurrier voting against. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS The City Planner and the City Attorney gave brief summaries of the ZORC and Staff recommendations. Both stated the changes are minimal. Comm. Spurrier recommended under Subd. 6a Item 3-Grading and Filling, that a specific inclusion for any work in public right-of-way be added. There was a consensus from the Planning Commission that this be added. Jon Albinson stated on Page 138, Subd. C, that he is concerned about disallowing steel in different types of construction. He would like to see this clarified. He also stated that on Page 140, Subd. 8, Landscaping, that it be appropriate to look at industrial landscaping requirements differently or modify the steps. Ron Beaty approached the podium and stated that only 50 percent of the landscaping requirement can be met in shrubbery. He suggested to the Planning Commission that the observe what other communities have done. Motion: Comm. Zak/Kelly offered a motion to approve the performance standards, with the exceptions as noted. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT The City Attorney gave a thorough description of the Minutes of the Page- Shakopee Planning Commission December 16, 1993 Staff recommendations for this district. She stated that a lot of the changes were to basically clean up the language. Comm. Spurrier commented regarding the word "decisions" made throughout this district. He would like a time limit be stated as to when a decision is to be made. Comm. Zak agreed with these comments. Bob Sweeney asked for clarification of what a 2 story building was, and suggested to the Planning Commission that a height limitation be added on page 202. Motion: Comm. Madigan/Zak offered a motion to accept the Administration and Enforcement section, with the appropriate corrections. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Comm. Zak/Madigan offered a motion to continue this public hearing to January 6, 1994, at 6: 00 p.m. IV. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9 :00 p.m. 3. OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 9, 1993 MEMBERS PRESENT: Joos, Madigan, Kelly, Zak, Christensen MEMBERS ABSENT: Mars, Spurrier STAFF PRESENT: Lindberg Ekola, City Planner Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant Planner Dave Hutton, City Engineer Amy Wicklund, Planning Intern Debra Zabel, Recording Secretary ROLL CALL Vice Chrmn. Kelly called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Roll call was taken as noted above. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. III. APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 4, 1993 MEETING MINUTES The meeting minutes were approved as presented. IV. RECOGNITION OF INTERESTED CITIZENS Vice Chrmn. Kelly recognized anyone in the audience wishing to speak on any item not on the agenda. There was no response. V. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR A 1' VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK IN ORDER TO ADD A SUN PORCH ONTO THE DWELLING AT 622 E. 7TH AVE: Amy Wicklund, Planning Intern, provided an overview of the application. She stated that the structure will ' variance since forualwesternrequire lot2line. She stated that the structure for thethatthe applicant is proposing the addition of the sun porch along the existing building line of the home. James Plekkenpol, applicant, stated he would ke to He enhance his property by building the sun porch. stated that they would abide by all criteria set forth by the board and staff. Motion: Comm. Zak/Joos moved to close the public hearing. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Minim of the Page- 2 Board of Adjustment and Appeals December 9, 1993 Motion: Comm. Zak/Joos offered Variance Resolution No. PC-675, A Resolution Granting a 2 Foot Variance to the Required 10 Foot Minimum Side Yard Setback in the Urban Residential (R-2) Zoning District, and moved its adoption. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. VI. OTHER BUSINESS Vice Chrmn. Kelly asked if there was any other business to discuss. There was no response from the Board. VII. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m. TENTATIVE AGENDA BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Regular Session Shakopee, MN January 6, 1994 Chairperson William Mars Presiding 1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of Agenda 3 . Approval of December 9 , 1993 , Meeting Minutes 4 . Recognition by Board of Adjustment and Appeals of Interested Citizens. 5. 7 : 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for a variance from the minimum lot width requirement of 150 feet within the Rural Residential Zoning District in order to develop lots on a cul-de-sac within the proposed Riverview Estates 2nd Addition. Applicant: Scott County Farms Action: Resolution No. 678 6. Other Business a. b. 7 . Adjourn Lindberg S. Ekola City Planner NOTE TO THE B.O.A.A. MEMBERS: 1. If you have any questions or need additional information on any of the above items, please call Terrie or Aggie on the Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting. 2. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting. TENTATIVE AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION Adjourned Regular Session Shakopee, MN January 6, 1994 Chairperson Terry Joos Presiding 1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of Agenda 3 . Approval of the November 30, December 2 , 9 and 16, 1993 , Meeting Minutes 4 . Recognition by Planning Commission of Interested Citizens. 5. Approval of Consent Agenda - (All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. ) 6 . 7 : 35 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider the preliminary and final development plans for the Eagle Creek Bluff Addition Planned Unit Development, located east of CR 18 and south of Boiling Springs Lane. Applicant: VanZee Homes, Inc. 7 . 7 : 40 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider the preliminary plat of Eagle Creek Bluff Addition, located east of CR 18 and south of Boiling Springs Lane. Applicant: VanZee Homes, Inc. 8 . 7 : 45 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for a Conditional Use Permit from Murray Williamson and Associates, Inc. for a 65 unit Holiday Inn Express Motel, to be located south of the Eagle Creek Plaza, north of the Super 8 Motel, and east of CR 17 . Applicant: Murray Williamson and Associates Action: Resolution No. 676 9 . 7: 50 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for a Conditional Use Permit to locate a church within the Mid- Density Residential Zoning District. The site is located south of Vierling Drive, adjacent to Emerald Lane. Applicant: Calvery United Methodist Church Action: Resolution No. 677 10. 7 : 55 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the preliminary plat of Riverview Estates 2nd Addition, located at the northeast corner of the intersection of County Rd. 18 and County Rd. 16. Applicant: Scott County Farms 11. 8 : 00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the preliminary plat for Orleans Addition, to be located east of CR 17, and south of Hillside Drive. Applicant: J. Patrick Leavitt, Jr. 12 . 8 : 05 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider a Registered Land Survey (R.L. S. ) for Mr. Don McKush, located east of CR 17 and west of CR 83 . Applicant: Don McKush 13 . VACATION: To consider the vacation of the remainder of the alley within the block south of 2nd Avenue between Holmes Street and Lewis Street. Applicant: City of Shakopee 14 . Other Business A. Land Acquisition Review - Water Storage Facility CR 16 & CR 18 (tabled from the December meeting) 15 . Adjourn Lindberg S. Ekola City Planner NOTE TO PLANNING MEMBERS: 1. If you have any questions or need additional information on any of the above items, please call Terrie or Aggie on the Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting at 445-3650. 2. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting. 4+3 NEWS RELEASE 1o � FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Linda Henning (612) 229-3279 MWCC RELEASES CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR ST. PAUL, December 22, 1993 -- The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) Board of Commissioners on Tuesday voted to terminate the appointment and employment of Chief Administrator Gordon Voss, citing the need for a change in leadership at the agency. The Board is in the process of appointing an Acting Chief Administrator until a full-time replacement is hired. MWCC Chair Lou Clark said the agency is entering a period of transition and the Board felt a change in leadership would be beneficial to meet future needs . "With all the changes, challenges and opportunities facing the MWCC now and in the coming years, the Board determined that new operational leadership would help assure that the agency would continue to meet its mission, " Clark said. "I commend Gordon Voss for his five years of public service and commitment to the agency. The decision was made because overall the Board felt it was time for a change. " The MWCC Board will begin the process of recruiting a new Chief Administrator immediately. The top candidate will be selected by these criteria: leadership, professional experience, proven (more) Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre,230 East Fifth Street,St.Paul.MN 55101 612 222-8423 EO 1M1T INK Printed on recycled paper,15%post-consumer MWCC RELEASES CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR. . . /2 administrative capabilities and commitment to public service . A national search will be conducted to assure that the final selection is drawn from a field of highly qualified candidates, meets the immediate needs of the agency and provides strong leadership to the agency into the next century. The MWCC owns and operates the regional wastewater collection and treatment system in the metropolitan Twin Cities area. MWCC' s 10 treatment plants process 300 million gallons of sewage every day, providing sewer service for more than two million area residents. Agency policies are established by a Board of Commissioners who represent geographic precincts within the seven- county metropolitan area. (30) LI 3490 Lexington Avenue North St. Paul,MN 55126 League of Minnesota Cities (612)490-5600 December 13, 1993 Dear City Manager/Administrator/Clerk: As many of you have new mayors and/or councilmembers taking office on January 1, it is important they learn the "how-to' s", "can-do's", and "can't-do' s" involved in running city government. For an in-depth overview and training session, the League has scheduled a one-day Conference for Newly Elected Officials. The conference will be held on Saturday, February 5, at the Sheraton Inn Midway in St. Paul . With the complexities city officials face in personal liability and conflict of interest, the open meeting law and data practices act, what councils can and cannot do, personnel and labor relations, planning, budgeting, THIS CONFERENCE IS A MUST! Along with a brochure describing the Conference for Newly Elected Officials is a brochure outlining three pre-conference seminars offered by Government Training Service (GTS) and Women in City Government . These programs are conveniently scheduled on Friday, February 4 at the same hotel . We encourage your city officials to attend any (or all ! ) of these special programs . They include seminars titled "Resolving Conflicts: Options for Mutual Gain and Enhancing Your City' s Response to Citizens, " presented by GTS and "Stress Reduction Through Time Management" sponsored by Women in City Government. These seminars would benefit both incumbents and newly elected officials . The enclosed brochures detail the three sessions . We would appreciate your assistance in distributing these brochures to your city officials . On behalf of the League of Minnesota Cities and Government Training Service, we send you our very best wishes for the new year. Sincerely, .. / Li 'James F. Miller Helene Johnson Executive Director Executive Director League of Minnesota Cities Government Training Service BUSINESS UPDATE FROM CITY HALL Vol. 8 No. 1 Dear Chamber Member: January 1, 1994 Administration program will focus on assistance to improve substandard rental units. A new character generator has been installed in City Hall. This equipment allows the City to communicate Park and Recreation with Shakopee residents via the Government Access Cable TV channel 12. Announcements regarding City On December 7th the Shakopee City Council agreed to programs and activities are updated daily. Funding for allocated $5,000.00 from the Park Reserve Fund to the equipment was provided by the Shakopee Public install lights around the former Hockey Bubble Ice Access Corporation. Rink. The Shakopee/Prior Lake Hockey Association is also contributing $5,000.00 to offset project costs. City Clerk The Shakopee Community Education and Parks and On December 7th City Council approved a tattoo Recreation Winter Broachure will be mailed to all School District residents on December 28 and 29. The license for Linda Kurian, 1st in Hair and brochure will include a complete listing of all Tanning/Body Art, 205 So. Lewis. City Council also community recreation and education programs approved a premises permit for pull-tab for the Prior available to Shakopee resdients. Extra copies are Lake Lions Club at Canterbury Inn. available at School District offices, 505 south Holmes On December 21st City Council adopted the fee Street and at City Hall, 129 So. Holmes Street. schedule for 1994 for all permits and licenses. A few Planning fees were increased to cover cost of expenses. Community Development At their December 9, 1993, regular meeting, the Shakopee Planning Commission reopened the public On December 21, 1993 the Shakopee HRA approved the hearing to consider amendments to Conditional Use Permit No. 376 for Mineral Extraction and Land Downtown Rehab Grant program amendments. The Rehabilitation on the property located east of CR 18, intent of the program is to stimulate downtown south of CR 83, and north of Valley View Road. The building improvements that are consistent with the permit was originally issued to NBZ Enterprises. The Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The new program applicants, representatives of Fischer Aggregates, Inc., guidelines require the use of an architect. made presentations about their proposal and fielded questions from the Commissioners and the public. The City Council continued discussions regarding the Planning Commission continued the public hearing Metropolitan Waste Control Commission agreement until after the Zoning Ordinance Review is completed. and the Chaska intercepter. Estimated costs for the City to connect to this sewer line that will service areas The Planning Commission reopened the public hearing South of the Southerly bypass range between $3.4 and to consider the preliminary and final development $5 million. This issue will again be discussed at a plans for the Eagle Creek Bluff Addition Planned Unit Committee of the Whole meeting scheduled for January Development, proposed to be located east of CR 18 and 11th. south of Boiling Springs Lane. The applicant, VanZee Homes, Inc., provided additional information and On December 21, 1993 the Shakopee HRA directed staff responded to questions from the Commissioners and and the CDC to develop a housing assistance program the public. After voicing approval for developing this modeled after the Rehab Grant Program. The site under the Planned Unit Development process, the selected topics. Planning Commission continued the public hearing to its January 6, 1994, meeting. The public hearing The Shakopee Police Department will be working with regarding the preliminary plat for this proposed the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms by addition was also reopened and continued to the providing information on firearms recovered in January meeting. connection with violent crimes involving juveniles or firearms recovered in a school zone. The purpose of The Commission reopened the public hearing regarding this joint initiative is to reduce the frequency of violent the preliminary plat of Prairie Bend, located on the crimes involving juveniles, identify the sources of guns south side of East 4th Avenue, south and west of the obtained by juveniles, and apprehend and prosecute K.C. Hall. The applicant presented revised plans that adults who violate firearms laws by illegally trafficking addressed concerns voiced earlier by staff, Planning firearms to juveniles. Commissioners, and City Councilors. After voicing encouragement for the concept of this project, the Public Works\Engineering Planning Commission continued the public hearing to its February 3, 1994, meeting. The City Council recently ordered the construction of The Planning Commission continued the public hearing sidewalks along the east side of Marschall Road, from for Conditional Use Permit No. 663, to allow fill to be 4th Avenue to 10th Avenue. Also included in this placed in the Floodway in Huber Park, until the project is the extension of the sidewalk on 10th Avenue February 3, 1994, meeting, or sooner if review from between Polk St. and the Shakopee Town Square Mall. the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources The Engineering Department will be designing this becomes available. project over the winter. The Commission tabled the Official Mapping/Land Other projects currently under design include the final Acquisition for a water storage facility proposed to be phase of the Downtown Streetscape Project (1st Ave) located at CR 16 and CR 18 until its January meeting. and the downtown alley reconstruction and electrical The Commission found a Land Acquisition for another undergrounding project. These projects will be water storage facility proposed to be located on Lots 1 designed and bid for 1994 construction. and 2, Block 1, Maple Trails Estates 1st Addition to be in compliance with the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan. The department is currently preparing feasibility studies for various other projects including llth Ave. The Planning Commission met on December 16, 1993, storm sewers (new Harrison St.) and an extension of to continue the Zoning Ordinance review process. The Vierling Drive from Adams St. (C.R. 15) to the Commission has reviewed the introduction, definitions, Shakopee Town Square. zoning districts, zoning map, overlay districts, performance standards, signs, and the administration In regards to construction, most projects are currently and enforcement sections of the Zoning Ordinance. shut down for the winter. Two projects that will The parking, conditional use provisions, and continue to be worked on all winter fare the Upper nonconformities sections are scheduled to be reviewed Valley Drainage Project and the VIP Sewer extension. on January 6, 1994, from 6:00 to 7:30 p.m. The Upper Valley Drainage project also consists of several storm sewer connections from the Shakopee Police Bypass. The VIP Sewer Interceptor project includes a forcemain from Rahr Malting, through the prison For the second time; Shakopee Police asked local property, Sweeney School and Lion's Park. citizens to join them at Police Academy. This is an The Public Works Department recently installed a opportunity for citizens to share with us what they feel computerized fuel management system. the community is looking for in their police department, and a chance for the department to share On a personal note, we would like to congratulate Jeff their ideas and information on current programs. The and Claire Swenson on the arrival of their new son, Academy includes a tour of the police department and Nicholas Andrew. information from records, patrol, training, and administration,a DWI demonstration and discussion of January 1994 ,I4 Upcoming Meetings SUM MOH TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4:30pm Public 7:00pm City 6:00pm ZORC Utilities Council Meeting 7:30pm Planning Commission g 10 11 12 13 14 15 7:00pm Committee of the Whole 16 1? 18 19 20 21 22 City Hall Closed 7:00pm City 5:00pm CDC - Martin L. Council 7:00pm Energy King and Transportation 23 24 25 26 2? 28 29 7:00pm Park & Recreation 1 30 3 1 December 1993 February 1994 SMTWTFS SMTWTFS 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 26 27 28 29 30 31 27 28 12/23/1993 test CITY OF SHAKOPEE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT FOR DECEMBER, 1993 Respectfully Submitted 471 David E. Hutton, P.E. Public Works Director PROJECT START COMPLETE STATUS COMMENTS Category I- Projects Under Construction 1. Minibypass 5/93 7/1/94 90% Mn/DOT Project 2. Valley Park 11th 7/93 7/1/94 90% Wear Course Asphalt Remaining 3. Upper Valley Drainage 9/93 7/29/94 70% See Narrative Section 4. 1993 Street Reconstruction 8/93 6/15/94 40% See Narrative Section 5. VIP Interceptor 10/93 Done 95% Testing Pipe Yet 6. Rahr Forcemain 10/93 Done 100% Testing Pipe Yet 7. Murphy's Landing Lift Station 10/1/93 Done 100% 8. Brambilla's Storm Sewer 10/1/93 Done 100% Category II- Projects in Design 1. Rahr Service Line 7/93 Done 100% Will Bid in 1994. No Rahr Agreement Yet 2. Public Works Parking Lot 1/94 3/94 0% 3. Downtown Alleys 6/93 3/94 40% Waiting on SPUC's Electrical Consultant 4. Parking Lot(Old Gene Brown) 1/94 3/94 0% Will Design with Alleys 5. Downtown Streetscape II 1/94 4/94 0% Waiting on Survey Work 6. Alley- Block 48 1/94 4/94 0% Waiting on Survey Work 7. Marschall Rd./10th Ave. Sidewalk 1/94 3/94 0% Waiting on Survey Work Category III - Projects Under Study 1. St. Francis Sewer/Water 7/93 3/94 30% Waiting on Watermain Input from SPUC 2. Pierce St. Vacation 10/93 12/93 100% Public Hearing 1/18/94 3. P. &V. Addition (Jackson Township) 11/93 1/26/94 60% 4. 11th Ave. Storm Laterals 11/93 2/94 50% 5. C.S.A.H. 18 Connection 11/93 4/94 0% 6. Vierling Drive, 12/93 3/94 0% C.R. 15 to Polk Street 7. Traffic Analysis to Mall 9/93 8/94 0% Category IV - Private Subdivision Construction 1. Beckrich Estates 1992 6/94 95% New Entrance off C.R. 78 Not Completed 2. Meadows 8th 5/93 6/94 85% Finish in 1994 3. Milwaukee Manor 6/93 9/94 90% Wear Course in 1994 4. Maple Trails 6/93 9/94 25% Finish in 1994 5. Dominion Hills 6/93 9/94 25% Finish in 1994 6. Stonebrooke 2nd Unknown Unknown 0% 7. Parkview 1st 7/93 8/94 85% Wear Course in 1994 8. Meadows 9th 10/93 9/94 80% Utilities Completed 9. Westridge Bay 2nd 10/93 9/94 25% Finish in 1994 1 PROJECT START COMPLETE STATUS COMMENTS Category V - Special Projects 1. Huber Park Grading Permit 5/93 3/94 90% Will go to Planning Commission in February 2. Maras Street 1990 ??? 90% City Attorney Working on Last 2 Easements 3. In-House Engineering Concept 4/94 7/94 0% Will Prepare with 1995 Budget 4. Prior Lake Outlet Channel 2/93 8/94 0% 5. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan 1992 4/94 95% Waiting on Final Chaska Interceptor Negotiations 6. Comprehensive Stormwater 2/93 4/94 90% Draft Plan Completed Management Plan Please refer to the attached narrative section for a more detailed discussion on several of the projects. 2 NARRATIVE SECTION Category 1 - Projects Under Construction 3 . Upper Valley Drainage Project - Phase II and Shakopee Bypass Drainage Facilities The mainline drainageway has been rough graded and is about 60% completed. Storm sewer Segments 1, 3 , 4 and 6 are about 90% completed. Segments 2 and 5 are not part of this contract, but under Mn/DOT contract . 4 . Street Reconstruction Projects (Spencer Street, 8th Avenue, 4th Avenue, Naumkeag Street, Fillmore Street and Atwood Street) The temporary asphalt has been installed on Spencer Street and Fillmore Street . The sidewalks on Spencer Street will not get completed this year due to the weather. All further work has been suspended on this project until next year. 5. V.I.P. Interceptor Extension All pipe installation is completed. All pipe is currently undergoing leak detection testing. 6 . Rahr Forcemain All pipe installation is completed. All pipe is currently undergoing leak detection testing. Category No. 2 - Projects in Design 1. Rahr Malting Inverted Siphon (Service Line) All design work been completed. The final agreement with Rahr Malting have still not been executed. Staff has requested prices from the VIP contractor to add this as a change order. Based on these prices, staff is recommending that this project be bid out in 1994 . 3 3 . Downtown Alley Reconstruction and Undergrounding Electric Lines The design of this project will need to be coordinated with Shakopee Public Utilities . All field survey work has been completed and design has started. The pavement reconstruction portion will be designed in-house, while the electrical design will be done by Shakopee Public Utilities Commission' s consultant . Construction of this project has been postponed until 1994 . Category 3 - Projects Under Study 1. St. Francis Hospital Sewer and Water The sewer portion has been completed and staff is still waiting on the watermain information from Shakopee Public Utilities . Category 5 - Special Projects 2 . Maras Street Easements All easements for the street have been obtained and recorded except two properties . The City Attorney is continuing to work towards obtaining the remaining easements . (No change in status) 3 . Total In-House Engineering Concept During the 1994 budget process, the City Council directed staff to prepare a proposal on what it would take to be a completely self-sufficient Engineering Department (i .e. no consultants, staff equipment and furnishings needed) . Staff has not prepared this study yet . This report will be prepared in 1994 , for the 1995 budget discussion. 4 4 . Improvements to the Prior Lake Outlet Channel The Watershed District has not submitted any proposed improvements to this channel . They have directed their consultant to prepare a study on this . Staff has not received any proposals from the Watershed District . 5. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan (Consultant) The draft report is done . The final report is being postponed until the final decision involving the Chaska Interceptor cost sharing agreement . 6 . Comprehensive City-Wide Stormwater Management Plan (Consultant) The draft report has been submitted to staff for review. 5 *5 MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT CITY OF SHAKOPEE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DECEMBER 30, 1993 Part I. Start Complete Status Comments Administration 1. 1994- 1998 CIP 4/1 10/19 100% Final draft being distributed 2. 1994 Budget 4/1 12/1 100% CC approved 3. J-Term Intern 1/3 1/28 0% Candidate selected Lone Range 1. Chaska Int. Agreement 6/1 2/1/94 95% Draft agreement review 2. Chaska Int. Conditions 7/1 2/1/95 20% Rural Density, MUSA Comp Plan policies research 3. Land Use Plan 3/1 3/1/94 50% On hold 4. East Shak. Trans Plan 1/1 3/1/94 25% On hold for land use decision 5. Zoning Ord. Update 6/1 2/8/94 80% Planning Commission reviewing draft Current Planning 1. Building Permits 12/1 12/29 Ongoing 33 Residential permits 1 Commercial permits 0 Industrial permits 2. Planning Reports 12/1 12/30 Ongoing 1 Variances 0 Appeals of CA 2 CUP 2 Plats 2 PUD 0 Rezoning 1 Vacations 0 Minor Subdivisions 2 Official Map Reviews 3. Enforcement 12/1 12/30 Ongoing 0 Complaints 5 Code Violations (Zoning) 2 Resolved Violations Management Information Systems (MIS) 1. Special Assessment Software 4/1 12/30 100% Complete 2. LAN Schematics/Doc. 8/1 12/30 100% Complete 3. PC Maintenance Tracking 8/15 12/30 100% Complete 4. Install New Tape Backup 12/1 2/1 50% Delivered 5. GIS Stage One 10/01 10/01/94 1% Initial meeting held 6. PC Hardware Upgrade 11/9 1/15 90% Installation in progress 7. Install File Server 11/9 2/1 50% Delivered (WP51\DOCS AMY\PROGRESS.nec) 12/30/93 Part IL MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT NARRATIVE Prior to their regular December 9, 1993, Planning Commission meeting time, members of the Shakopee Planning Commission attended a 30 minute seminar on residential densities. The subject was raised in conjunction with the Commission's ongoing review of the Zoning Ordinance. At their regular meeting on December 9, 1993, the Shakopee Board of Adjustment and Appeals approved a two foot variance from the required ten foot side yard setback for James and June Plekkenpol of 622 East 7th Avenue to allow the applicants to build a sun porch addition to theft house. At their December 9, 1993,regular meeting, the Shakopee Planning Commission reopened the public hearing to consider amendments to Conditional Use Permit No. 376 for Mineral Extraction and Land Rehabilitation on the property located east of CR 18, south of CR 83, and north of Valley View Road. The permit was originally issued to NBZ Enterprises. The applicants, representatives of Fischer Aggregates, Inc., made presentations about their proposal and fielded questions from the Commissioners and the public. The Planning Commission continued the public hearing until after the Zoning Ordinance Review is completed. The Planning Commission reopened the public hearing to consider the preliminary and final development plans for the Eagle Creek Bluff Addition Planned Unit Development, proposed to be located east of CR 18 and south of Boiling Springs Lane. The applicant, VanZee Homes, Inc., provided additional information and responded to questions from the Commissioners and the public. After voicing approval for developing this site under the Planned Unit Development process, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing to its January 6, 1994, meeting. The public hearing regarding the preliminary plat for this proposed addition was also reopened and continued to the January meeting. The Commission reopened the public hearing regarding the preliminary plat of Prairie Bend, located on the south side of East 4th Avenue, south and west of the K.C. Hall. The applicant presented revised plans that addressed concerns voiced earlier by staff, Planning Commissioners, and City Councilors. After voicing encouragement for the concept of this project, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing to its February 3, 1994, meeting. The Planning Commission found the proposed vacation of the portion of Pierce Street between 3rd and 4th Avenues to be consistent with the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission recommended option four from the feasibility study to the City Council. Option four calls for vacating the street, but creating an alley on the north half of the street that would connect the existing east-west alley to 3rd Avenue. The Planning Commission further recommended that the vacation of Pierce Street not be processed until the owner of Lots 6 to 9,Block 42 and the north half of the vacated east-west alley has met all the requirements of the property's Conditional Use and Building Permits. The Planning Commission continued the public hearing for Conditional Use Permit No. 663, to allow fill to be placed in the Floodway in Huber Park, until the February 3, 1994, meeting, or sooner if review from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources becomes available. The Commission tabled the Official Mapping/Land Acquisition for a water storage facility proposed to be located at CR 16 and CR 18 until its January meeting. The Commission found a Land Acquisition for another water storage facility proposed to be located on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Maple Trails Estates 1st Addition to be in compliance with the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan. Finally,the Commission approved the 1994 Meeting Schedule for the Board of Adjustment and Appeals and the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission met on December 16, 1993,to continue the Zoning Ordinance review process. The Commission has reviewed the introduction, definitions, zoning districts, zoning map, overlay districts, performance standards, signs, and the administration and enforcement sections of the Zoning Ordinance. The parking, conditional use permits, and nonconformities sections are scheduled to be reviewed on January 6, 1994, from 6:00 to 7:30 p.m. No more curled pages: a plain paper fax is in place in City Hall. Several happy public servants are using upgraded computers with faster processors and color monitors. Additional printers have been delivered and will soon be installed. Internal E-mail is here to stay. A new file server with larger tape backup has arrived. Final training for FMS/AC software has been held. As always, daily trouble shooting continues. (W?S1%IXCSIAMn?ROGRfiss.Dsc)12/30/93 * 10 Monthly Project Report - Submitted by Barry Stock December 30, 1993 Project Start Complete Status Comments 1 . Clinic RFP' s ? ? 0% 2 . AWAIR Program ? ? 0% 3 . Perform Employee 1/1 ? 0% Evaluations 4 . Rehab Grant Program 5/4 12/1 100% Amendments 5 . City Hall Mtg. Room 9/1 9/7 90% Policy 6 . P.W. Union Contract 9/1 12/7 100% 7 . City Hall Union Contr. 10/15 12/21 50% 8 . Non-union 94 Pay Plan 12/1 12/21 80% 9 . City Hall Elevator 12/15 1/15 90% Maint . RFP' s 10 . City of Shakopee Bldg. 11/1 12/15 80% Maint . RFP' s 11 . Pesonnel Policy 12/1 1/31 80% Amendments 12 . City Newsletter 1/1 4/1 0% Development 13 . Sr. Planner Selection 1/1 2/1 25% 14 . Bldg. Usage Policy 12/1 1/15 90% 15 . Downtown Utlities 12/1 8/15 0% 16 . Housing Program 1/1 4/15 0% Development 17 . TIF Plan Amendments 12/15 3/1 5% Other Comments The Recreation Dept. workload is as projected. The Winter Program brochure is being completed. TENTATIVE AGENDA REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 4, 1994 LOCATION: 129 Holmes Street South Mayor Gary Laurent presiding Oath of Office by Newly Elected Officials 1] Roll Call at 7: 00 P.M. 2] Council Meeting Objectives and Procedures 3] Appointments to Housing & Redevelopment Authority - Res. 3930 4] Approval of Agenda 5] Recess for H.R.A. Meeting 6] Re-convene 7] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 8] Mayor's Report 9] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 10] Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. ) 11] Approval of Minutes of December 7, 1993 12] Communications: a] Bill Koniarski, Chair, Scott County Transportation Coalition regarding Minnesota highway system in crisis ' 13] Informational Hearing on sidewalk improvements along Marschall Road from 4th to 10th and along 10th Avenue from Tyler to the Mall 14] Boards and Commissions: a] Sienna Corporation request for rezoning and deletion of mandatory PUD for property lying South of 4th Ave. and South and West of KC Hall (Lenzmeier property) TENTATIVE AGENDA January 4, 1994 Page -2- 15] Reports from Staff: *a] Official Newspaper b] Canterbury Downs Letter of Credit - See HRA item #5 c] Street Light at Vierling Drive & Marschall Road - tabled 12/7 *d] Infiltration and Inflow Study *e] Nominations to Boards and Commissions *f] Interfund Transfers *g] Bids for Full Size Squad Car *h] Purchase of 1994 Compact Pickup *i] Bids for Suburban (Fire Dept) *j ] Purchase of Computer Bridge *k] Approve Bills in the Amount of $261, 737. 33 1] 1994 Liaison Appointments *m] Shakopee Senior Graduation Party, Inc. 16] Resolutions and Ordinance: *a] Res. No. 3931 - Apportionment of Special Assessments for Milwaukee Manor First Addition *b] Res. No. 3932 - Appointment of Special Assessments for The Meadows 9th Addition *c] Res. No. 3935 - Authorizing Execution of Proxy for The Minnesota Municipal Money Market (4M) Fund *d] Res. No. 3936 - Requesting Use of A Scott County Building for Police Training 17] Other Business: a] b) c] d] 18]_ Recess for an Executive Session to discuss matters covered under the attorney-client privilege 19] Re-convene 20] Adjourn to Tuesday, January 18, 1994 at 7 : 00 P.M. Dennis R. Kraft City Administrator REMINDER: Jan. 11th - Committee of the Whole at 7: 00 P.M. Jan. 26th - Jackson Township Meeting at 7: 00 P.M. MEMO TO: City Council, City Administrator and Department Directors FROM: Gary L. Laurent, Mayor RE: Council Meeting Objectives and Procedures DATE: December 27, 1993 It is my belief we can best serve the interests of our City by conducting Council meetings in a fashion which accomplishes the meeting objectives outlined below. Although it is a major duty of the Mayor to bring order and direction to meetings the responsibility for process is shared with Council and staff . I propose that a workshop session be scheduled within the next 6 weeks so that Council programs and goals for 1994 can be discussed. Although I consider all of the items outlined in this memo open for discussion at the workshop meeting, I believe it important "start on the right foot" . Therefore, I ask your support in immediately implementing those procedures herein outlined. Most probably fall under Mayoral prerogative and are in fact a matter of style. All are intended to be beneficial to our common concerns . MEETING OBJECTIVES: Although all incumbent Council members received a memo from me on this subject last year, I believe a review of procedures will be beneficial not only to Councilor Dirks, but to everyone. While not necessarily a complete list of meeting objectives, the following were considered when proposing certain meeting procedures . Meetings should (in no order of importance) : - Be concise - Be understandable (by Councilmembers, staff, recording secretary, attenders, the press and TV audience - Be accountable (to the citizens being represented) - Be open to public input - Allow ample opportunity for discussion and fair representation of all ideas and opinions - Encourage staff input of material fact and staff conclusions - Enhance the image of the City - Be respectful to all people - Conduct the business of the City with the interests of the overall community guiding the decision making process . MEETING PROCEDURES: Some of the following are recommended changes while many others are reiteration of previously adopted procedures where stronger adherence is sought . I am recommending that we : - Limit the "Liaison Reports" section of the agenda to just liaison reports - Have "Other Business" a regular part of every agenda - Have "Mayor' s Report" as a regular part of every agenda - Allow the audience to speak to the consent agenda regarding the removal of an item from consent - Generally maintain stricter adherence to parliamentary procedure (but not absolute! ) - Enforce that only those having the floor as recognized by the chair shall speak - Encourage both audience and Councilmembers to address the chair - Encourage that motions be descriptive of action sought 1 .e . not simply "move the requested action" . - Make a stronger effort to make motions only in the affirmative - Allow any member to make modifications to a motion, if acceptable to the maker, but only, prior to the start of discussion as signalled by the chair; (After discussion has begun a motion can be altered only be a successful motion to amend) - Disallow discussion on a motion until seconded. - Generally allow the member who makes a motion to be given the first opportunity to speak on that motion. - Generally recognize any member who has not spoken on a question over one who has - Discourage cumbersome, lengthy and numerous amendments to a motion - Rule against explanation of vote by members during voting - Delete "automatic" roll call votes - Declare a unanimous vote if a motion receives any votes on one side and none on the other - Generally, report by the chair the results of all votes indicating those members in the majority - Delete the need for motions for minor actions which can be handled more informally by general or unanimous consent - Make every effort to be protective of staff, Council and citizens from personal or unnecessarily derogatory attacks CONSENT AGENDA: If Councilmembers desire to abstain on a particular item on the consent agenda they can inform the chair that they will be voting on the consent agenda, but that they want minutes to show that they have abstained on a particular item. CONCLUSION: I will focus most of my attention during meetings on the process of the meeting itself . I still, however, will need your assistance in maintaining proper meeting procedure. That is our challenge . It' s easy to drift away. Please do not take my enforcement of procedure personally and please let me know (preferably after the meeting) if you think I was out of line . Please also discuss with me any ideas or comments you may have for the way meetings are run. The contents of this memo will be discussed at our meeting on January 4 , 1994 . However, if you have a major concern about any of the above, please contact me prior to the meeting for explanation and discussion. "I really believe we are doing a good job following the above procedures. I would like to thank each of you for your help in making our Council meetings something to be proud of . " REQUESTED ACTION: 1 . Endorse Council Meeting Objectives and Procedures as outline, or; 2 . Amend and endorse Council Meeting Objectives and Procedures . TENTATIVE AGENDA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Annual Meeting January 4 , 1994 Oath of Office by New Officials 1 . Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M. 2 . Approval of the December 7, 1993 meeting minutes 3 . Election of Officers 4 . Statement of Interests in Real Estate 5 . Canterbury Downs Letter of Credit 6 . Other Business a) b) 7 . Adjourn Dennis R. Kraft Executive Director HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 7, 1993 Chrmn. Beard called the meeting to order at 7 : 07 PM with Commissioners : Vierling, Lynch, Sweeney and Mayor Laurent present . Also present : Dennis Kraft, City Administrator; Barry Stock, Asst City Administrator; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; Karen Marty, City Attorney; Dave Hutton, Public Works Director, and Judith S . Cox, City Clerk. Sweeney/Lynch moved approval of the November 3rd & 18th, 1993 Minutes . Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kraft explained that Jacobs Realty would like to secure approval for substituting the Jacobs Realty letter of credit for the Ladbroke letter of credit which guarantees the payment of property taxes for Canterbury Downs through 1995 . He stated that the closing date was to be December 15th, however, there is litigation pending at this time . Mr. Kraft stated that the other provisions the city had with Ladbroke should be continued on with this agreement . Mr. Jacobs stated that there is a possibility to close on December 15th, but they wanted to come before the HRA to make sure they satisfied the replacement letter of credit . Sweeney/Lynch moved to indicate to Jacobs Realty that the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority is willing to consider the replacement of the Ladbroke letter of credit with one from Jacobs Realty, Inc . provided that all of the applicable conditions in the original agreement with ladbroke Corporation be met by Jacobs Realty Inc. and further that this letter of credit be substituted only after the successful closing of the real estate transaction for Canterbury Downs between Jacobs Realty, Inc. and Ladbroke Racing Corporation (New Canterbury Downs) . Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock explained that the Park & Recreation Advisory Board has been discussing options for funding park improvements. He explained that the existing tax increment financing plan does not allow for expenditure of funds for park development purposes, but that it could be amended. Mr. Stock stated tax increment funding could be used for a possible community center and outdoor park facilities, ball fields, swimming pool, etc . Cncl . Sweeney stated that such an amendment would not automatically authorize any action or funds being utilized without first coming before city council and HRA. Sweeney/Lynch moved to authorize the appropriate HRA officials to work with the City' s Bond Counsel to develop the necessary Tax Increment Financing Plan amendments to allow for the potential financing of park improvement projects. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock explained that the Community Development Commission (CDC) has been working with the architect on amendments to the Rehab Grant Program and there have been some provisions deleted and some criteria added to make it more restrictive . Sweeney/Vierling moved to refer the Rehab Grant Program Guideline amendments, as submitted by the Community Development Commission, to the Committee of the Whole on December 14 , 1993 . Motion carried unanimously. Ms. Marty explained briefly why Mr. Rutt is requesting reimbursement for title insurance he purchased in connection with the property he is buying from the HRA. Because Mr. Rutt was not present she recommended that the request be tabled to allow him an opportunity to speak to the matter. Discussion followed. Laurent/Vierling moved to approve the payment to Mr. Rutt of $380 for title insurance . Mayor Laurent commented that Mr. Rutt had an opportunity to speak tonight but elected not to appear. He also stated that Mr. Rutt chose to close on this property rather than wait for the torrens process to be completed and therefore should accept the consequences involved with purchasing the property. Motion failed unanimously. Chrmn. Beard adjourned the HRA meeting at 7 : 25 PM. Dennis R. Kraft Executive Director Debra Zabel Recording Secretary MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Election of Officers DATE: December 30, 1993 INTRODUCTION: Article II Section B of the Bylaws of the HRA provide for the election of officers at the annual meeting. BACKGROUND: The Bylaws provide that a Chairman, Vice Chairman and Secretary be elected by and from the Commissioners at the annual meeting immediately after the roll call and approval of the minutes of the previous meeting. The officers shall take office immediately after being elected. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to elect a Chairman, Vice Chairman and Secretary from the membership of the Commission. If Li MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Toni Warhol, Administrative Secretary RE: Commissioner Interest in Real Estate DATE: December 27, 1993 Please find attached a disclosure of real estate located within the corporate limits of the City of Shakopee. Please list any property that you have interest in. Thank you. **NOTE: I have attached last year's for your convenience. I, , have interest in the following real estate located within the corporate limits of the City of Shakopee: Date: Signature: 01;04 £44 15:22 FAX 612 340 2644 DORSEY 'HITNEI 21002 ( 4 WS DORSEY Sc WHITNEY A►.a.•au..?111C1CTIC,frwav,o..c Ce+,+Lao►S NEW yogic gpGSS$r88,2 KIf PILLSBURY CENTER SOT 220 SOUTH SIXTH STREET WASHINGTON, D. C. jILLIvfS N XTss402-1498 DEvvE B 612) 340-2600! HEAT FALLS FAX(ea)340-2868 ?i 13 S O V I.d ORANGE GOVNTY, CS THOMAS S.KAT D s S O I]�E S 0121345:79616 LONDo� aAL[Go 88IIS9ELS . January 4, 1994 Mr . Barry Stock Executive Director Housing and Redevelopment Authority 129 Holmes�Street 579 South Shakopee, Re: Canterbury Downs Dear Barry: As you know, Bob Silverman of our office is representing ro osed acquisition Jacobs Realty, Inc. with respect to its p of of P the the Canterbury Downs Racetrack. As a necessary part acquisition Jacobs Realty, Inc. has agreed to assume theRA under obligations of Minnesota Ractoro the, to the City's Racetrack, described in 1993, a certain agreements relating proposed form of letter agreement dated as of December 8,Marty has among the City, the HRA and Jacobs Realty, suggested that the proposed letter agreement be rewordedlso that either Jacobs Realty, Inc. assumes Minnesota Racetracks the obligations .under the Development Agreement (as described in the Assessment Agreement and the Payment Agreement) is cr nt letter agreement, or Minnesota Racetrack, Inc. Bob Silverman released that from the Development Agreement. to make Karen thinks this change is necessary and Bob is planning this change to the proposed letter ag lamentation of the I believe the approval, execution and implementation December 8 letter agreement, with the change suggested by earth Marty, would leave the Citrin the same position as it is now in, and therefore should be agreeable to: the City. Very truly you s, : 7e,.---- . Thomas S. Hay TSH/lmm • J144-04-1994 4 '10=24 b12 340 2b44 92 P.02 01.04 94 16:06 FAX 6123407800 DORSEY "HITNEY (ij002 DORSEY ac WHITNEY A P—.Maswr 1xcturwo Paonssmr.,Wasoy=ays NEW YORE PILLSBURY CENTER SOUTH ROCHESTER,MN WASHINGTON, D. C. 220 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55402-1496 BI i 2=vG3 .S DENVER (612) 340-2600 1 OaEVAT FALLS ORANGE COUNTY, Cs FAX lam)dao-9868 hupsOVLA LONDON ROBERT J.SILVERMAN DEss MOINES garts BELS (812$442742 • rAa00 January 4, 1994 13Y FAX Mr. Barry Stock The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Shakopee 129 First Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Canterbury Racetrack • i Dear Barry: I enclose a revised draft of the letter to the City of Shakopee concerning the Canterbury Racetrack. The only changes are to eliminate the reference to the Development Agreement in the last paragraph of the text of the letter and the I paragraph by which the City and the HRA consent. Dan Lindsay will be at the council meeting this evening and is in position to execute the document at that time. Very tru urs, • • Robert J. Silverman I RJS:jkk Enclosure cc: Daniel T. Lindsay Thomas S. Hay II JHN-Ido-1' 94 i6:09 bi2.541aTe60 93'4 P.02 01/04'94 16.07 FAX 6123407S00 D0RSE1' S"HITNEF 0003 JACOBS REALTY, INC. 100 South Fifth Street Suite 2500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 if January 4, 1994 City of Shakopee 129 First Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55379 The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Shakopee 129 First Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Canterbury Downs is fI Ladies and Gentlemen: ;I Jacobs Realty, Inc. ("Jacobs") has a contract to acquire the Canterbury Downs Racetrack from its present owners, New Canterbury Downs, a Minnesota general partnership ("Sellers"). We are aware of the terms and conditions of the Second Amended Contract for Private Development between the City of Shakopee, Minnesota ("City"), the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota ("Authority") and Minnesota Racetrack, Inc. dated November 20, 1984, as amended by First Addendum to Second Amended Contract for Private Development dated March 5, 1985 and by Quit Claim Deed dated March 8, 1985 ("Development Agreement"). We are also aware of the Assessment Agreement between the Authority and Minnesota Racetrack, Inc. dated October 29, 1984, as amended by Amendment to Assessment Agreement dated May 14, 1992 and Second Amendment to Assessment Agreement dated October 14, 1992 ("Assessment Agreement"). We are also aware of the Payment Assurance and Security Agreement dated October 13, 1992 between the Authority and Ladbroke Racing Canterbury, Inc. ("Payment Agreement"). �fI Our contract with the Sellers requires that we provide assurances that the Sellers will have no exposure, after closing under the Assessment Agreement and Payment Agreement. In order to so assure the Sellers and in accordance wit1i the terms of those documents, Jacobs proposes, at closing, to assume the obligatidns s under the Assessment Agreement, and the Payment Agreement. Please take thisi letter as our written undertaking that, subject to closing on the purchase, Jacobs Realty, Inc. will assume the obligations set forth in the Assessment Agreement and the Payment Agreement from and after closing. At or shortly after the closing, is misimmmummo J H 1�!774 l b•etS b 1 GJ4✓_1 173.00 P.073' 01/04'93 16:07 FAX 6123407500 DURSEI' xHITNEl 2003 • City of Shakopee The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Shakopee January 4, 1994 Page 2 Jacobs will deliver to the Authority an Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit which will satisfy the requirements of Section 2.02 of the Payment Agreement. When closing occurs and Jacobs delivers the Letter of Credit in a form acceptable to the Authority, we ask that you release Ladbroke Racing Canterbury, Inc., New Canterbury Downs, and its partners, Ladbroke Racing Minnesota, Inc. and Racing Corporation of Minnesota, now known by mergers as Hartman & Tiner, Inc., from all liability after the dosing with respect to'the Assessment Agreement and Payment Agreement and further cancel and release to them the Letter of Credit previously issued and outstanding under the Payment Agreement. Very truly yours, JACOBS REALTY, INC. By Its 'I The undersigned hereby agree in connection with the sale of Canterbury Downs, and subject to closing thereof, to accept from the new owner; Jacobs Realty, Inc., the assumption of obligations after the dosing under the Assessment Agreement and Payment Agreement above referred to, and upon receipt of a new letter of credit, in a form acceptable to the Authority, we will release Minnesota Racetrack, Inc., Ladbroke Racing Canterbury, Inc,New Canterbury Downs, Ladbroke Racing, Inc. and Racing Corporation of Minnesota, now known by mergers as Hartman & Tiner, Inc., from all future liability under and or pursuant to the Assessment Agreement or Payment Agreement and will return their letter of credit held by us in connection with such agreements. Dated: CITY OF SHAKOPEE By I� Its II .1 JAN-04-1994 16 09 6123407800 9 P.04 01/04/94 16:08 FAX 6123307900 DORSEY HHIT\EY Eit005 City of Shakopee The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Shakopee January 4, 1994 i Page 3 THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE By Ii Its .I it TC hl_fiA_'1 OOA +C•fa0 C1'7ZA 70Mn l J1"11• UY 1JJY 1V•VJ VIGJYVIVVV JJ/ •VJ HR — S— coofi e l /Sb MEMORANDUM TO: COMMISSIONERS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Karen Marty, City Attorney DATE : December 30 , 1993 RE: Canterbury Downs Letter of Credit BACKGROUND: At the last HRA meeting, the HRA discussed the proposed substitution of a letter of credit from Jacobs Realty, Inc . for the letter of credit we have from Canterbury Downs . Due to the broad language in the letter of intent, staff requested that this item be tabled to seek input from our bond counsel . Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator, attempted to contact our bond counsel, Tom Hay, and learned that he was out of town. He should be returning on Monday, January 3, and has been asked to contact us as soon as possible. We hope to have a response from him in time for the HRA meeting Tuesday night . Any information we receive from him will be placed on the table . An attorney representing Jacobs Realty will be present at the meeting. ACTION REQUESTED: None until we receive word from our bond counsel . / Signed L�� Karen Marty, Cit attorney KEM:bjm [3 OMEMO2] MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, Executive Director HRA FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Canterbury Downs Letter of Credit DATE: December 14, 1993 INTRODUCTION: On December 7, 1993 , the Shakopee HRA discussed the status of the Canterbury Downs letter of credit in relation to the proposed acquisition. Jacobs Realty, Inc. is requesting that the appropriate HRA and City of Shakopee officials to execute a . memorandum of understanding in regard to the letter of credit . BACKGROUND: On December 7, 1993 the Shakopee HRA members conceptually agreed to substitute the letter of credit on file with New Canterbury Downs and replace it with a new letter of credit from Jacobs Realty, Inc. providing that all necessary and applicable conditions are met in a form acceptable to the City and HRA. On December 8, 1993 staff received a correspondence from Jacobs Realty, Inc . (See Attachment) The correspondence serves as a memorandum of understanding between the City of Shakopee, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and Jacobs Realty, Inc. regarding the status of the letter of credit should a property transaction occur by and between New Canterbury Downs and Jacobs Realty, Inc. The memorandum basically specifies that the City and the HRA agree to release New Canterbury Downs, Inc . from the letter of credit providing that Jacobs Realty, Inc. substitutes a new letter of credit that will satisfy all the requirements of Section 2 . 02 of the original payment and assurity agreement . The City Attorney has reviewed the memorandum and believes that it does nothing more than conceptually agree to release New Canterbury Downs from their letter of credit commitment in exchange for a new letter of credit from Jacobs Realty, Inc . in a form acceptable to the City. ALTERNATIVES : 1 . Authorize the appropriate HRA/City officials to execute the memorandum of understanding by and between Jacobs Realty, Inc . and the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority. 2 . Do not authorize the appropriate HRA/City officials to execute the memorandum of understanding. 3 . Table action pending further information from staff . ACTION REQUESTED: H R 1 . Move to authorize the appropriate HRA officials to execute the memorandum of understanding by and between Jacobs Realty, Inc . and the Shakopee Housing geandbRedeer ,7elo9ment Authority for the City of Shakopee dated 3 . coupluC 2 . Move to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the memorandum of understanding by and of Shakopee dated DecemberetweengJacobs 1993 ,Realty, Inc . and theCity BAS/tiv CovXc1L - 13&. CottsE ,/T MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, Executive Director HRA FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Canterbury Downs Letter of Credit DATE: December 14, 1993 INTRODUCTION: On December 7, 1993 , the Shakopee HRA discussed the status of the Canterbury Downs letter of credit in relation to the proposed acquisition. Jacobs Realty, Inc. is requesting that the appropriate HRA and City of Shakopee officials to execute a memorandum of understanding in regard to the letter of credit . BACKGROUND: On December 7, 1993 the Shakopee HRA members conceptually agreed to substitute the letter of credit on file with New Canterbury Downs and replace it with a new letter of credit from Jacobs Realty, Inc. providing that all necessary and applicable conditions are met in a form acceptable to the City and HRA. On December 8, 1993 staff received a correspondence from Jacobs Realty, Inc . (See Attachment) The correspondence serves as a memorandum of understanding between the City of Shakopee, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and Jacobs Realty, Inc. regarding the status of the letter of credit should a property transaction occur by and between New Canterbury Downs and Jacobs Realty, Inc. The memorandum basically specifies that the City and the HRA agree to release New Canterbury Downs, Inc . from the letter of credit providing that Jacobs Realty, Inc. substitutes a new letter of credit that will satisfy all the requirements of Section 2 . 02 of the original payment and assurity agreement . The City Attorney has reviewed the memorandum and believes that it does nothing more than conceptually agree to release New Canterbury Downs from their letter of credit commitment in exchange for a new letter of credit from Jacobs Realty, Inc . in a form acceptable to the City. ALTERNATIVES : 1 . Authorize the appropriate HRA/City officials to execute the memorandum of understanding by and between Jacobs Realty, Inc . and the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority. 2 . Do not authorize the appropriate HRA/City officials to execute the memorandum of understanding. 3 . Table action pending further information from staff . JACOBS REALTY, INC. 100 South Fifth Street Suite 2500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 December 16, 1993 City of Shakopee 129 First Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55379 The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Shakopee 129 First Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Canterbury Downs Ladies and Gentlemen: Jacobs Realty, Inc. ("Jacobs") has a contract to acquire the Canterbury Downs Racetrack from its present owners, New Canterbury Downs, a Minnesota general partnership ("Sellers"). We area are omthe terms between the City of Shakopee, Second Amended Contract for Private Development Minnesota ("City"), the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota ("Authority") and Minnesota Racetrack, Inc. dated November 20, 1984, as amended by First 1985Addendum to and byQust C1aimecond ADeedded datedoMarch ntract for Private Development dated March 5, 8, 1985 ("Development Agreement"). We are also aware of the Assessment Agreement between the Authority and Minnesota Racetrack, Inc. dated October 29, 1984, as amended by Amendment to Assessment Agreement datedr 14M2 (May 4, 1992mndd Second Amendment to Assessment Agreement date Agreement"). We are also aware of the Payment Assurance and Security Agreement dated October 13, 1992 between the Authority and Ladbroke Racing Canterbury, Inc. ("Payment Agreement"). Our contract with the Sellers requires that we provide assurances that the Sellers will have no exposure, after closing under the Assessment Agreement and Payment Agreement. In order to so assure the Sellers and in accordance with the terms of those documents, Jacobs proposes, at closing, to assume the obligations under the Assessment Agreement, and the Payment Agreement. Please take this letter as our written undertaking that, subject fforthin ltheclosing on the purchase, Jacobs Assessment Agreement and Realty, Inc. will assume the obligations se the Payment Agreement from and after closing. At or shortly after the closing, City of Shakopee The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Shakopee December 16, 1993 Page 2 Jacobs will deliver to the Authority an Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit which will satisfy the requirements of Section 2.02 of the Payment Agreement. When closing occurs and Jacobs delivers the Letter of Credit in a form acceptable to the Authority, we ask that you release Ladbroke Racing Canterbury, Inc., New Canterbury Downs, and its partners, Ladbroke Racing Minnesota, Inc. and Racing Corporation of Minnesota, now known by mergers as Hartman & Tiner, Inc., from all liability after the closing with respect to the Assessment Agreement, Development Agreement and Payment Agreement and further cancel and release to them the Letter of Credit previously issued and outstanding under the Payment Agreement. Very truly yours, JACf+BS REALTY, INC. L -C1 By . \ Its F The undersigned hereby agree in connection with the sale of Canterbury Downs, and subject to closing thereof, to accept from the new owner, Jacobs Realty, Inc., the assumption of obligations after the closing under the Assessment Agreement and Payment Agreement above referred to, and upon receipt of a new letter of credit, in a form acceptable to the Authority, we will release Minnesota Racetrack, Inc., Ladbroke Racing Canterbury, Inc., New Canterbury Downs, Ladbroke Racing, Inc. and Racing Corporation of Minnesota, now known by mergers as Hartman & Tiner, Inc., from all future liability under and or pursuant to the Development Agreement, Assessment Agreement or Payment Agreement and will return their letter of credit held by us in connection with such agreements. Dated: CITY OF SHAKOPEE By Its • City of Shakopee The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Shakopee December 16, 1993 Page 2 Jacobs will deliver to the Authority an Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit which will satisfy the requirements of Section 2.02 of the Payment Agreement. When closing occurs and Jacobs delivers the Letter of Credit in a form acceptable to the Authority, we ask that you release Ladbroke Racing Canterbury, Inc., New Canterbury Downs, and its partners, Ladbroke Racing Minnesota, Inc. and Racing Corporation of Minnesota, now known by mergers as Hartman & Tiner, Inc., from all liability after the closing with respect to the . Assessment Agreement, Development Agreement and Payment Agreement and further cancel and release to them the Letter of Credit previously issued and outstanding under the Payment Agreement. Very truly yours, JACBS REALTY, INC. By sQ����. Its Via Prisident Seac&A The undersigned hereby agree in connection with the sale of Canterbury Downs, and subject to closing thereof, to accept from the new owner, Jacobs Realty, Inc., the assumption of obligations after the closing under the Assessment Agreement and Payment Agreement above referred to, and upon receipt of a new letter of credit, in a form acceptable to the Authority, we will release Minnesota Racetrack, Inc., Ladbroke Racing Canterbury, Inc., New Canterbury Downs, Ladbroke Racing, Inc. and Racing ll future liabilration ity f nder Minnesota,and or pursuant by mergers as Hartman & Tiner, Inc., fromY the Development Agreement, Assessment Agreement or Payment Agreement and will return their letter of credit held by us in connection with such agreements. Dated: CITY OF SHAKOPEE By Its City of Shakopee The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Shakopee December 16, 1993 Page 3 THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE By Its ✓ RESOLUTION NO. 3930 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS FOR THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee on January 11, 1977, adopted Resolution No. 1014 which accepted the resignation of the previous Commissioners of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority and appointed in their place the then current members of the City Council, and WHEREAS, it was and is the intent of the City Council for the Mayor and all future members of the City Council to automatically serve as Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority concurrently with their Council terms. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. That Robert Sweeney and Kristen Dirks are hereby appointed as Commissioners of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority until December 31, 1997, and Gary Laurent is hereby appointed as Commissioner of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority until December 31, 1995. 2. That the above-named persons will serve until new Council members and a Mayor have taken the oath of office as members of the City Council and are qualified as Commissioners by taking the Commissioners' oath. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 4th day of January, 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 7, 1993 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 7 : 05 PM with Cncl . Vierling, Lynch, Beard and Sweeney present . Also present : Dennis Kraft, City Administrator; Barry Stock, Asst. City Administrator; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; Karen Marty, City Attorney; Dave Hutton, Public Works Director, and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk. Mr. Kraft deleted from the agenda 131) 1994-96 Public Works Labor Agreement . Mr. Kraft added to the Executive Session litigation and collective bargaining. Vierling/Sweeney moved to approve the agenda as modified. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent recessed the City Council meeting at 7 : 07 PM for an H.R.A. meeting. Mayor Laurent reconvened the City Council meeting at 7 :25 PM. Liaison reports were given by the Councilmembers. Mayor Laurent gave the Mayor' s report . Mayor Laurent asked if anyone present in the audience wished to speak on any item not on the agenda. Mark Pidde, President of Shakopee Youth Hockey Association, asked the Council to approve a lease agreement for this organization to have pull tabs in Springers on Main. Ms . Cox explained to Council the procedure to be followed to approve a premises permit for pull tabs . Beard/Sweeney offered Resolution No. 3922, A Resolution Approving Premises Permit for the Shakopee Youth Hockey, Inc . (conditioned upon the surrender of the existing license at Springers on Main) , and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Councilmembers added to the consent business : 10a) Barb10b Mahar, request to use space at former City Hall building; Kaufenberg, request from Hockey Association for lights at former ice bubble hockey rink at Lions Park; 12a) Refuse Collection Contract -Addendum #2 ; 13f) Stop Sign Request on 7th and Dakota; 13h) Pierce Street Vacation/Improvements from 3rd to 4th and 13o) Employee Group Insurance Proposals . Councilmembers deleted from the consent business : 9) Approval of the Minutes of November 16th and 18th, 1993 and 14h) Resolution No. 3915, Premises Permit Prior Lake Lions Club. Cncl . Beard stated that in the minutes of November 16 , 1993 on page 6 talking about the temporary blacktop that it was unclear that the Official Proceedings of the December 7, 1993 Shakopee City Council Page -2- comment by Mr. Hutton was in answer to a question by Cncl . Beard. Therefore he would like to have this portion to be amended to make clear that this was in answer to his question. Beard/Vierling moved to approve the Minutes of November 16, 1993 with an amendment to page 6, paragraph 8, "In answer to a question that Cncl Beard asked, Mr.Hutton stated that possibly the City could put down temporary blacktop" . Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Lynch moved approval of the Minutes of November 18, 1993 . Motion carried unanimously with Cncl . Beard abstaining. w Vierling/Lynch moved to grant permission for the All Night Graduation Party Committee to utilize space at the former City Hall between January 1 and June 9, 1994 . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch moved to allocate up to $2, 500 from the Park Reserve Fund to offset the costs of installing outdoor light fixtures around the former ice bubble hockey rink at Lion' s Park. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch moved to approve contract addendum #2 to the Refuse Collection Contract by and between the City of Shakopee and Waste Management Inc . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Ms . Cox, City Clerk, gave a brief presentation of the Tattoo License being requested by Linda Ann Kurian, 1st in Hair and Tanning/Body Art . Ms . Cox stated that Mr. Paskoff, did an inspection of the premises and found it to be an appropriate facility for this use . She explained the variances being requested and other changes Ms . Kurian asked for. Mayor Laurent read a letter received by Rita Topic on behalf of Linda Kurian. Ms . Marty stated that Ms . Kurian has requested wearing blue surgical gowns as opposed to the white garments required under City Code . Lynch/Sweeney moved to approve variance requests of Linda Kurian for a tattoo license to permit the use of dry heat for sterilization (only when using disposable needles) , use of a dental chair for clients, and use of colored washable garments for technicians to be effective upon the date of publication of an amendment to the City Code permitting said variances . Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Sweeney moved to direct the City Attorney to prepare the appropriate ordinance amending the City Code to permit the variances requested. Motion carried unanimously. December 7, 1993 Official Proceedings of the DecDece -3- Shakopee City Council Pag Lynch/Sweeney moved to find the 64 sq. ft . area to be sufficient in which to practice tattooing, since it is located within a beauty shop occupying over 800 sq. ft . Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Sweeney moved to approve the application and grant a tattoo license to Linda Ann Kurian, 1st in Hair and Tanning/Body Art, 205 S. Lewis, through December 31, 1994 effective uponhe to the of publication of an amendment to the City Code permitting variances requested. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3917, A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 3720, Adopting the 1993 Budget and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to buy back unused holiday hours in the amounts indicated and from the individuals listed in the emo from the carried underolice Chief,consent busaness , )ated 12-1-93 (CC DOC No. 205) . Vierling/Lynch moved to accept the quotation from the League of Citiesdeposit workers ompensation coverage for 1994 with a premium of $114 566 (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch moved to ratify the authorization of the proper City officials to execute a waiver of special assessment appeal rights for city property for the VIP II sewer extension project . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch moved to direct staff to complete a warrant study to determine if stop signs are warranted at the intersection of 7th Avenue and Dakota Street and report back to the City Council at the earliest opportunity. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Mr. Kraft explained the meetings City staff has been having with staff from Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) and Met Council regarding Shakopee hooking up to the Chaska interceptor. He said that hooking up as a trunk sewer would cost app roxima $2 . 6 to $4 million dependent upon the amount of flow and the location. Mr. Kraft suggested that Council add this to a Committee of the Whole meeting for December 14 , 1993 to decide whether Shakopee should connect to the interceptor, to discuss the cost options and the impact on sanitary sewer rates . Mr. Kraft stated that included in the draft agreement is a change in the minimum lot size from 2 . 5 to 10 acres . Sweeney/Vierling moved to refer the Chaska InterceptorCo Agreement with the Met Council, the MWCC and Shakopee City Committee of the Whole meeting on December 14 , 1993 . Official Proceedings of the December 7, 1993 Shakopee City Council Page -4- Mr. Hutton, in answer to Council' s questions, explained that the interceptor could be connected at all points listed, however, option A (CR-15) is out of city limits . He explained that hook up at B (CR-79)would be the farthest point and the highest in cost . Mr. Hutton explained the alternative connecting points to the Chaska Interceptor and went through specific points for Council to look at such as options of payment . Mayor Laurent explained to the audience that Council is proposing to put this item on the Committee of the Whole to discuss alb the new information that was given to them. Mr. Jon Albinson, 5740 Valley Industrial South, stated that he would like to bring up some points to staff at this time so these items could be discussed with the MWCC before the next meeting. Cncl . Sweeney suggested that Mr. Albinson write staff the concerns he has and also copy Councilmembers . Ms . Marty stated Brian Ohm, Met Council Attorney, and Allen Dye, MWCC Project Manager, were present tonight if Council had any questions of them. Both gentlemen stated they would be available for the meeting on December 14th. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Lynch moved to have Cncl . Vierling continue attending these meetings with Met Council and MWCC to obtain her expertise from her service on the MWCC. Motion carried with Cncl . Vierling abstaining. Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3909, A Resolution Calling a Hearing on an Improvement to Pierce Street from 3rd Avenue to 4th Avenue, Project No. 1994-5, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3910, A Resolution Initiating the Vacation of Pierce Street from 3rd Avenue to 4th Avenue Except Alley, Original Plat of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch moved to direct staff to obtain the executed agreement for the new easement and authorize proper City officials to prepare and sign appropriate documents to release the existing easement with J. L. Shiely Co. (Motion carried under consent business . ) 7, 1993 Official Proceedings of the December Page - Shakopee City Council Mr. Hutton explained the supplement St to Aid Systems 1994-1998 He explained Improvement Program dealing that the City is allowed to designate so many eceive funding. tare at Aid System and for those miles the City would Hutton stated the only way to designate undesignated iny the resofutu�e if Council and that the streets need be . f the ith Mr. Hutton explained the second thatportion theC City needsltodspendwthe project selection. He stated money they receive, if the money increases too much the City will be penalized. Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve the 1994-1998 State Aid Capital Improvement Program. Mr. Hutton wanted to congratulate kn t the newprostaff Civil Engineer, Dave Nummer, for his hard t . Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Lynch moved to approve bills in the amount of $27, 178 . 61 . (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch moved to ratify the execution of an easement between the City of Shakopee andthe Stateofthef Rahrnesota' s forcemainorre (Motiontional Facility for the installation carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch moved to direct the City Engineer to prepare an engineering feasibility study itsradoptiaon ruc(Motion ure c a�ri ed under ments in the P & V Addition, and moved consent business . ) Vierling/Ly nch moved to accept the proposal for employee group insurance starting January 1, 1994 from Blue Cross Blue Shield for health coverage through the psius Agency, from h t e Ochs Agencytanda ufrom Life for life and AD&D coverage througthrough the Capesius Fortis Benefits for long term disability 9 Agency and to authorize the ficials onsentto businesse ) the necessary documents . (Motion carried under herling/Ly nch offered Resolution No. 3912 , A Resolution Approving the Final Plat for Westridge Lake Estates, First Addition, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vthe Public Hearing Date to Consider the Vacation of a Portion of the Alley in Block 30 Shakopee inessPlat, ) and moved its adoption. (Motion carried underconsent Official Proceedings of the December 7, 1993 Shakopee City Council Page -6- Mr. Hutton stated that there is an existing Developer' s Agreement (1987) with a property owner on Marschall Road to put in sidewalks or the city could put in sidewalks and assess them and the developer waived their right to assessment hearing. Staff would like direction as to what Council would like to do, in light of recent City policies concerning sidewalks, with the proposed sidewalk improvements . Cncl . Sweeney stated that consistent with recent practice not to assess for sidewalks on collector streets, he did not feel the city could hold this agreement in force and make the developer pay for something that is beneficial to the public . Mayor Laurent stated that he may have been involved with this project and if that is the case he would abstain from the discussion. Mr. Hutton stated that he did bring a copy of the agreement and felt that the Mayor was involved with this project . Sweeney/Beard offered Resolution No. 3907, A Resolution Ordering an Improvement and the Preparation of plans and Specifications for Sidewalk on Marschall Road from 4th Avenue to 10th Avenue and for Sidewalk on 10th Avenue from Tyler Street to the Shakopee Town Square Mall, Project No. 1994-3 , and moved its adoption. Motion carried with Cncl . Vierling and Mayor Laurent abstaining from the vote . Ms . Marty stated that if Council was not proposing assessments, then a majority vote would suffice . Sweeney/Beard moved to direct staff to cancel the Developer' s Agreement relative to that portion of the proposed sidewalk project which would have otherwise been paid for by the developer (Eagle Creek Junction 2nd) . Cncl . Beard asked what amount of the Developer' s Agreement the City would now be obliged to pay and how many other situations there are like this in Shakopee . Ms . Cox informed council that another Developer' s Agreement is in place for Century Plaza Square 4th Addition on the corner of Marschall Road and Fourth Avenue, and that sidewalks are to be installed along Fourth Avenue . She said this would be a similar situation so assumed the decision of Council would reflect this other agreement as well . Cncl . Sweeney stated that the intent of his motion is for sidewalks not in existence at this time, not to reimburse anyone for sidewalks already in existence . December 7, 1993 ec Official Proceedings of the DD Page -7- Shakopee City Council Mr. Hutton stated that the estimated cost of the sidewalks for this project would be $15, 000 . Ms . Cox stated that at the time of the agreement for sidewalks in Eagle Creek Junction 2nd there was not a need or' desire to construct sidewalks, so there was an agreement made between the developer and the City to provide for construction at a later date. Motion carried with Cncl . Beard dissenting, Mayor Laurent and Cncl . Vierling abstaining from the vote. Sweeney moved to direct staff to hold an informal public hearing in front of Council on the d nue from Tylerewalks g to athe Mall from 4th to 10th and along g l0thAvenue Mayor Laurent stated that he now did not believe he had a conflict of interest in this property and he thought the agreement stated that the assessments would be paid by the new property owners. Cncl . Vierling stated that she also did not need to abstain from the vote, but felt that since she had interest in property on Marschall Road that it would be better to abstain. Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3911, A Resolution Ordering the Preparation of a Report on 11th Avenue Storm Sewer Laterals, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3908, A Resolution Ordering the Preparation of a Report on an Improvement to an Unnamed Street Connecting the Existing County Road 18 with the Proposed new County Road 18 , and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3914 , A Resolution Accepting Work on 2nd Avenue, from Sommerville Street to Shawmut Street including Various Abutting Cross streets, Project No. 1991-3 , and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3916 , A Resolution Accepting Work on Vierling Drive, Between itsCounty adoptiona 17 and(Motionocarriedaunder 79, Project No. 1992-3 , and moved consent business . ) in Cncl . Vierling asked wehablertorha�e pullt etabseatrCanterburysInn Shakopee that would b rather than an organization outside of the City. Cncl . Lynch stated that Murphy' s Landing would be interested in such a money raising program, however if they are not informed of the possibilities than it is impossible to get into a location. Official Proceedings of the December 7, 1993 Shakopee City Council Page -8- Ms . Cox explained that the state law allows a municipality to limit the potential licensees to organizations that spend so much of their proceeds within the City' s trade area, this area is defined by state law. She stated that the licenses are usually good for two years when they' re approved by the State Gambling Control Board. Ms . Cox suggested that other organizations interested in selling pull tabs should contact the City staff to find out where licenses are issued. She stated that the Gambling Control Board would issue two licenses for the same site on the restriction they may not rent the same space . Ms . Cox stated that if the Council were to deny the license there would have to be a legitimate reason so it would not be discriminatory. Cncl . Vierling suggested tabling the item until Council can receive other applications from Shakopee organizations and then determine which better fits the City' s plan. Mayor Laurent stated that the owner of the premises has to agree to allow the organization to sell pull tabs at their establishment . Cncl . Sweeney inquired whether it would be possible for Council by ordinance to require the City be informed of any termination of gambling permits . Ms . Marty stated that she would check into this possibility but did not feel there would be an advantage to knowing this information ahead of time . Vierling/Beard offered Resolution No. 3915, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Approving Premises Permit for the Prior Lake Lions Club, and moved its adoption. Motion carried with Cncl . Vierling dissenting. Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3918, A Resolution Apportioning Assessments Among New Parcels Created as a result of the Subdivision of Land, Parcel No. 27-004-069-0, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . ) Mayor Laurent recessed the City Council meeting at 9 : 04 PM for an Executive Session to discuss land acquisition, litigation and collective bargaining. Mayor Laurent reconvened the City Council meeting at 9 :48 PM. No action was taken during the Executive Session. Mayor Laurent adjourned the meeting to Wednesday, December 8, 1993 at 7 : 00 PM for the public hearing on the 1994 budget . Cncl . Sweeney spoke regarding the public hearing. Meeting adjourned at 9 : 56 PM. Judith S. Cox Debra Zabel City Clerk Recording Secretary January 4, 1994 Mayor and Council Members City of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55. _ Re: City of Shakopee Planning Cacmission Dear Mayor and Council Members: I applied for appointment to the Planning Ccu fission because I believe every member of this cor;munity has a responsibility to make some kind of volunteer contribution to their corrnrmity. their church or their school . While I was a meMber of the Planning Commission, I did my homework, I prepared for meetings and took an active interest in Zoning issues, for after all , I swore to uphold the City's Ordinances when I was appointed. I made an effort to watch my neighborhood and other city activity centers for the :::ore blatant violations of the City of Shakopee Zoning Code. I have objected to violations which I felt would have a denigrating effect on my neighborhood or the activity centers. After serving on the Planning Commission for the past 4 years, I have decided that I will not re-apply for appointment. I have reached this decision because I believe the City does give Planning Comrmission volunteers enough respect to warrant further frustration of serving on this commission. The following examples illustrate my point: • I noticed "outside storage" at K Mart. I talked to the store manager and was told that they would gladly screen the storage if the City would simply write them a letter noting the non-compliance and reauesting screening. I called the City Administrator's (then Manager/Planner) attention to the problem at my third meeting as a Planning Cormissioner and I was told to be patient, I was told a new Planner would soon be hired. I was told the new Planner needed to get his feet on the ground. Time passed and I was then told that a new Assistant Planner was being hired and as soon as the assistant settled in, the assistant was going to work on Code compliance. I was told the Planning Department was over- loaded, I was told that Shakopee just did not have the staff, and I waited for someone to write K Mart a letter on City stationery requesting that K Mart erect a fence to screen its outside storage from the adjacent residential neighborhood, so K Mart could send that letter to its home office and get fundina for the fence to screen outside storage. Much to my own embarrassment, K Mart's Manager would ask about the letter whenever I saw him in the store. I waited three years for that letter and once it had the letter, K Mart irmmediately installed the screening. The message this gives a Planning Carmission McMber is that the City is indifferent to Code enforcement or the City is indifferent to a request by a Planning Commission Member or some combination of both. • A review of past Planning Ccamission Agenda packets will show that items are routinely placed on the agenda even though information, required for the applications, is missing or is received long after the application deadlines. This practice occurs so that applicants can maintain a Mayor and Council Members City of Shakopee City of. Shakopee Planning Commission January 4, 1994 Page 2 of 2 timetable or schedule that the applicants have established for themselves. The schedules of the applicants do not necessarily take into account the information needs of the public or the Planning Commission Merroers. The Planning Commission Members are then expected to make decisions without required information or with minimal time to review the information. The message this practice gives a Planning Ccmni.ssion Mer:oer is that the City will continue this practice in order to acoarmodate the applicants and not the decision makers. • A subdivision needed the vacation of right of way. i did not believe it was appropriate to vacate that right of way until a decision was reached on the layout of the west interchange of the T.H. 169 Bypass. I did not prevail on the timing. It was unfortunate to see lost access to the mall , but I did not want to see pedestrian access lost. I recce mended and obtained the addition of a pedestrian trail in the subdivision. The trail was to connect the mall and the existing designated pedestrian corridor on 11th Avenue. Improvements were made to the subdivision, but the pedestrian trail was not among the improvements. The City was asked about the status of the trail in August, 1993. The trail was installed in 1993. The trail does not connect to the mall, the trail does not meet A.D.A. accessibility requirements for the handicapped and a drainage way floods the trail every time it rains or every time snow melts. The message in this incident is that the City needs to work on follow up. I have pointec: out three exam les I believe show a lack of respect by the City. Unfortunately these were not isolated examples. As a volunteer, I do not need to seek frustration. There are many other opportunities for volunteers in this community and I expect to seek those. I have taken this dramatic action because I believe that the remaining Panning Commission Members and my successor needs more respect. The City need to change. Sincerely, Henry 1 . Spurrier 1717 Presidential Lane Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 n�R SpvKieint ( � f co fcls wt rpt cDoNo/4 q7 rt� e i• y-9 y NE-Erin izc CN...... 1.... NIIIIN Scott County Transportation Coalition P.O.BOX 153 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 (612)496-8346 MEMORANDUM MEMBERS OF THE COALITION: Scott County Board DATE: December 23, 1993 of Commissioners Cities of Belle Plaine TO: Scott County recipients of the Scott County Transportation B Elko Coalition newsletter Jordan New MarketitX n New raguc Prior Lake FROM: Bill Koniarski, Chair Sgvage Shakopee Townships of: Belle Plaine Blakeley Cedar Lake Credit River We must send a message to our Governor and local legislators NOW. Helena Jackson se NewMarket We know our highway program has a lot to do with our survival and our jobs, New Ma SandCrek` but there are many other factors that relate to a great highway program; Spring Lake bringing farm products, manufacturing goods and services to the market Chambers of Commerce place. Safety for our children on school buses and the rest of us as we travel Prior Lake Savage for whatever reason. The costs of congested highways and lack of timely Shakopee maintenance will cost the tax payers in our state many times more if we delay Industrial Commissions: Prior Lake the funding programs needed NOW. Shakopee • Attractions: Please have every voter in your agency or household sign the attached form, CanterbTury Downs and when you have all the signed forms, please return them to Brad Larson, Murphy's Landing MN Little Six Inc. Scott County Highway Department, 600 Country Trail East, Jordan, Renaissance Festival ����,� Va!leyfatrFamily 55 52. Amusement Park Ex-officio Members: Minnesota Department of Thank you in advance for your support. Transportation Hennepin County Department of Transportation Metropolitan Council City of Bloomington City of Burnsville Bloomington Chamber of CommercB K/kg LeSucur Chamber of Commerce f V Att. MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SYSTEM IN CRISIS The condition of Minnesota's highways and bridges is deteriorating quickly. In 1991 the Transportation Study Board created by the Minnesota Legislature determined we should be spending double what we were then on highway reconstruction. Since that time, the money spent on the Minnesota State Highway system lettings has shrunk almost 40 percent. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has recently canceled 315 projects from its 1994 to 1996 program. The total list of canceled projects represented $500M in scheduled construction and the loss of over 2,700 private sector jobs. Mn/DOT's literature further suggests that if a decision is not made to increase the funding for streets and highways, Minnesota would lose its ability to match federal funds and highway construction would completely stop by 1999! Streets and highways are the foundation of our whole economic system and way of life. The ability to travel freely throughout the State and Twin Cities metro area is essential to economic development, jobs, personal safety and the integrity of our neighborhoods and schools. While highways must be coupled with a whole range of transit and management actions, without roads nothing else moves. If the school bus can't get the children to school without sitting in traffic or crossing an unsafe bridge or highway, what happens to our education system? Our personal safety, our jobs, and our ability to access important recreation and education opportunities all are at stake. If Minnesotans are concerned about the impending crisis on Minnesota's highways, they need to speak as a single voice--restore the 315 projects canceled from the Mn/DOT 1994-1996 highway construction programs. It is time for action; it is time to restate the commitment to our highway infrastructure. It is time to speak out for the highway you use and tell your elected officials why these roads are important to you. NOTE: The Shakopee Bypass is one of the projects delayed. The project schedule shows a 3-YEAR delay--to 1997!! = TSPO . , • - • �.. BRIDGE THE GAP D O FII1'G I support the restoration of the 315 important projects in the Mn/DOT 1994-1996 Highway Construction Program through responsible funding programs. Name (Print) : Signed: Address : Telephone : Comments : Name (Print) : Signed: Address : Telephone : Comments : Name (Print) : Signed: Address : Telephone : Comments : MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Marschall Road/10th Avenue Sidewalk Project DATE: December 29, 1993 INTRODUCTION: On December 7, 1993 the City Council of Shakopee ordered the preparation of plans and specifications for the construction of sidewalk on the east side of Marschall Road from 4th Avenue to 10th Avenue, and on the south side of 10th Avenue from Tyler Street to the Shakopee Town Square Mall. During discussion of this item, the Council directed staff to hold an informational meeting for all adjacent property owners. This meeting is scheduled for the January 4, 1994 City Council meeting. The purpose of this meeting is to solicit public opinion and/or comments on the project. BACKGROUND: Both of these sidewalk projects were recommended by the Planning Commission as desirable projects during discussion of the Comprehensive Trail and Sidewalk Plan in September of 1992. As a part of their recommendation, the Planning Commission identified a list of criteria for constructing sidewalks. These criteria are listed below in order of priority. 1. School pedestrian routes 2. Minor arterial streets 3. Collector streets 4. School/park areas 5. Commercial areas 6. Pubic facilities 7. Local streets The Marschall Road Sidewalk Project meets four of the criteria, (No.'s 1, 2, 5 and 6) and the 10th Avenue Project meets three of the criteria (No.'s 2, 5 and 6). To be feasible, or desirable, a project should meet a minimum of one or two of the above criteria, depending on the priority. These projects clearly demonstrate not only a high priority for construction, but compliance with the Comprehensive Trail and Sidewalk Plan as well. In accord with the Planning Commission recommendations, these projects were included in the Capital Improvement Plan for construction in 1994. On December 7, 1993 the City Council ordered these improvements and staff is proceeding with the design and preparation of construction plans. Because the project will not be assessed, a public hearing is not required. But the City Council directed staff to schedule an informational meeting with the abutting properties in order to solicit comments and respond to any questions regarding the City Council action on this project. All abutting property owners have been notified of the January 4, 1994 informational meeting. Staff has received only one call from a property owner regarding this project. Specifically, this owner was concerned about a safety issue at the corner of Shakopee Avenue and Marschall Road. Due to the steep grades of the street and curve in the road, this intersection apparently has historically resulted in vehicles running up over the curb onto yards. This particular resident requested that the City look at this issue when designing the sidewalk and possibly even relocate the walk in this area two blocks east onto vacant Ramsey Street right-of-way. Staff indicated that the safety issue would be evaluated during the design, but as far as relocating the sidewalk two blocks east for this area, staff did not feel this would be a good alternative because it is highly unlikely that pedestrians would travel four blocks round trip distance in order to go one block north or south on the sidewalk. Staff indicated that these issues would be passed on to the City Council at the January 4, 1994 meeting. ACTION REQUESTED: Because the City Council has already ordered this project, no action is required of the City Council at the January 4, 1994 meeting unless they wish to reconsider their previous action. DEH/pmp MARSCHALL 1 * MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, City Planner RE: Application for Rezoning the Lenzmeier o Urban Residential From Multi-family Residential (R-4) (R-2) and to Delete the Mandatory PUD Requirement DATE: December 30, 1993 INTRODUCTION: At the November 3, 1993 meeting, the Shakopee City Council tabled their decision on the proposed zoning amendment in order to allow the developer an opportunity to review other options. BACKGROUND: Sienna Corporation has submitted a request to rezone 68 of the 84.5 acres of property owned by the estate of Lorraine Lenzmeier from Multi-family Residential (R-4) to Urban Residential (R-2) , anddelete the mandatory requirement for a Planned . Unit Development (PUD) . The site is located south of 4th Avenue, approximately 1/2 mile west of Canterbury Downs. (See Exhibit A. ) At their October 7, 1993 meeting, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding this rezoning request and recommended the denial of this application to the City Council. The Planning andmissionmof ed theenial of mandatoryh request and the deletionPUD because the requests are inconsistent with the adopted land use plan. DISCUSSION: At the December 21, 1993 meeting, the City Council reviewed a revised conceptual site plan for the Lenzmeier site. The developers proposed a reduction in the amount of single family lots and a change in the multi-family development from five (5)a ultpl e storied apartment buildings to a large number of six (6) eight (8) plex structures. It was noted by members of the City Council that the revised concept plan was an improvement to the original proposal. At the December 9 , 1993 meeting, the Planning Commission also reviewed Sienna's revised concept plan for the Lenzmeier property. In general, the Planning Commission felt that this plan was an improvement over the first submittal. They felt that the proposed mix of housing types was more appropriate. Staff feels that through the PUD review process, the developer can work to negotiate development standards for the single family development within the subject site and replace the underlying R-4 requirements. Since the PUD process does not permit a reduction in exterior setbacks, the underlying R-4 district regulations can help establish larger buffer areas around the perimeter erareas tothe pr ime of this project.ect This will result in larger buffering commercial, industrial, and racetrack land uses. The mandatory PUD and underlying R-4 zoning provide the necessary regulation for the development of the subject site. One additional issue that has come up in the review process lhas asnto do with the minimum 20% open space requirement. The app have indicated that they can provide the required open space areas with the revised concept plan. Action by the City Council on the specific request to rezone 68 of the 84. 5 acres from R-4 to R-2 alicant withdraws the applicationnd the deletion of the y PUD must be taken unless, the app ALTERNATIVES - 1. Grant both the request to rezone and the request to delete the mandatory PUD requirement. 2. Grant the request to rezone, but deny the request to delete the mandatory PUD requirement. 3 . Deny the request to rezone, but grant the request to delete the mandatory PUD requirement. 4 . Deny both the request to rezone and the request to delete the mandatory PUD requirement. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny the request for rezoning from R-4 to R-2 and deny the request for the deletion of the mandatory PUD requirement (Alternative 4) because the requests are inconsistent with the adopted land use plan. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer a motion to direct staff to prepare the appropriate ordinance to rezoning 68 acres of the subject site from and to Multidelet-family Residential (R-4) to Urban Residential (R-2) , the Mandatory PUD requirement, and vote in the negative. (Approval of this motion would require an affirmative vote of 4/5 of the City Council. If the City Council concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council shoed uld vote AGAINST this motion. If the City Council wishes to app the single family rezoning, the City Council should direct staff to initiate a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of the subject site to single family residential. ) [WP51\DOCS\AGGIE\PLANNING\PRAIRBND.CC) _• EXHIBIT A _ •---7-7------ .. #4r - _.... t • ' J....-...:. ..••.'..... ... .. •- \-•••.)"'....%. • .41 --- • •'.' o.'' -. .....Z . . . .- ... .• , .. _ - .... . .• • . - ' •' • - .• - . ... , .,..... \ .. . .. .--,• ........-..... •--"--.- ..--•. ..• . • • ., L ' i • .. ' . ...,'•....'"' • .." '#. -•• . \ . r ..\... _ _ _-___- 1 ,s _ - _,. _ _ „.......... • _: ._. , . ..:1____ . .t. s •.... ., __. ...... 1. .: le. , __ .4.44 1 ,_ :.--w • • , .... ,..._... _ .. ..• .s.&,. .. • c .. I__::..•__:____ ... : • .,„ „ , . .. , :„.._:......_... , A x,-.3: . • • • . ..;i ;----; -• -.. • -..____ -• ..,-..,i...,,.. . _ . • ......1,-......--.. \ : _. ,.__ • . _-- ••• .....---- .-.4?.._,.._:.; . . • .„:„...-,---,-•=•-=-1------,v, ..---r.--; % =--— 7.-..i ..--:: ' 4 ___,------ • ILI L aa..L...B.INR•Ila : '-. •••-7,.. .,4.i --"....-"-"..---.-'--.--'-'-----IID..a...".IIAM.1.•• 1••••• I ;•:-.. ! --..----..--- ...----, ,4maasm• ------- "'"'''...''....'7f---7•7 .. -. •-•••:,•••••:,:-:::::•:(4- :\•":: t 1 ; ....--. • zaili_____I z i r.---7Wgi::.:**i§:::i:K:::,:i::::::.:z 4.• .4:.s ; - , :•.:.:.:•*::3:•:::§ r---...------- ft..., '',,,ft•**::: .-C'i-- ---Vringinal.; • i : I f:S6.1..:::: ...t.i**.g.i:::§:i.::::.:::::•R;;Ke.z...:.:. • • Vt k .-4,7,•1• ri:Ka0%'.?WVA:Z:Z.:;.-it%.:-:.:-.... ... .4i&VVWZ•Z,r '.::::OnlaW.N.: t . 34#b . ...It eV.- ':.4:::Wg'''Zs'..s....'':.i•':.:%..•-::':%:::::::;r:k1A.:::?;ii1:*g::-•:•?')Z'':4 A:RalnaiW.; . , . i ! ''• 41::-.:;%:$:{----t---:34-v-.--U:*:40-.:.:§a .:::z.M04.Kii.g.....ig4; i ...,..,...:.:. ....:,- ,N-,.. .k. • . :.4*.N,.:.:,-:2,.;.,:-.:.::".::,.. .:v4x.::::... . . : .e, .., t :0K5'KA":$:.;'(, -x-..1:%*'''''A‘ ' - x ' .'tiaft:Vef::*KV:*::1-5. ;:i:a.....,• . . 1,e,'.'i'l) ‘.1 I-7 -. ':::',.§:Z.N"k.4-$V".f..'''--.. - 4S14::•;:::t3IM4.•:::-...:',; :•::0:::X5-::::N.-40-%::::::&::i.1 ; 2 -i:K::::,x3K:§S.E:K:•.4.4::...::•,...54t..:'%::N.,..‘:',:::''''--------------------'..v,..::.•,..."%Aix.--- -.,...,4i:: 1.---,--+.:), •' • .::.::::.:ii:i:K:i::%::?.:::.::::.:n„..--,:.?‘ ::,:..c.#41/ -.iwe‘-...•.-. :-(.z.-0...:4......i-z..:-:::::-,..i:z.,.0.ef,:::-:•..,--: . , — F---- ::: :::::-.:6.0:*:.::::::::*•:::%sm:::,, ....:.:::::...1.,.,,, .. s'•••••••,.:''i!.'.'':.'3ii• 2 z"n.1!!I !il: 4'-..-' -.i':-n.-k_*'i.lii.l"iiiA-s'r 2.'.::.::.K*:kii'.:,•...a:m.._iiX,,.:._..'i.t::i:.s..:a-.'W.,iZ:::)k.1:-5.:-.--'..4'•i..::n.•.%.:A::.:A".'::-:':.-..4.f:"....:.i:2::i:,::3'4K,1:f:4*::i"V.A2i..iM.I:::;:::.-".0.,.*....-.V.:.::...;4.:?.:.:.,::'.:...A..:5i2:g5*:MKK:::W::P:::::::.'.::',;":':.. ,,,MM,:+K,•,.-,....e4,,....R,.....,".t',:W:.y'..*:-:.:.::::4..:';:...''l.e..,..PW:,.':,,::f:,‘",:..:.,:*.,.:.,,.:&W.•-.:P,.V.:,0k.,,...4_.,,..„u,:M...i‘,1e,i:f-:-:,,.X..,:E:.K:Zi.::.:A§.:„...:.:.:.:3.:::.M";"::::M::::w::.:::K.v-.:..:,..::..:K4:-..$:.::,i,.v.k.•:%:5:1,..•>2 -- - ZM0 : , ., . ...... • r. .._4;"-,,.;:;_,Vfs‘V::::.--:-:•:---iiIii.:M:•&•:CifO.Fge, -,1§1::,0.-4t:i:Z1%::::•311: ..." ----- ..:Ai.;,%%.•••••-,,;-•::::,N.kiikr.•-•-•.-.;•:::A.-:3::::•§NA,Awtv•-•:KV.-:,:,:c•--::-'$.$1?.:iK::::.. . ., . ..,....-1 : --, 7.....kk...ce:::••••••-::•.5.s.:,:v.,...:•:•;.::wf::::,:::::,..: .. ..:,,Ny::::*•:Kk..,x,41.•K:::::, ., iviw.4t•-•••••:•::::::;..:;::::N::::,§03::-.:iiii,4g.:::,..,,-:,:wza•-.::::A,-%:4:::v4;vxgoc...:•:-...•,..:•--4• ....NK.....::,,k$,..,,,:ik, ..N:::-,v%§&$:RZAK.x.--fd6.::::-..z,:•:.,:.::A.i . .... _ 1 . -- --- .."•-•-•,. T -:-..'.: rAMSW. c % •;:i?..:000:10NOW4t, r -------j t \ , .•.1. , . - ".`A.-.-D...A. •*.tr,‘i..r4n/i -it.-:..•'k . \ __ 64wi"-;-'m,_--•.e.:.-.,.:A?_,.:z:--4i:V-m-:-,•:•:,,;:,::::_':,_-::_t'::;',i-K:.:.):i,#-i,4,.i:t;;i,:ii:p:i.-i';7.-:f?4&-7.,'.-4:.„i-t..v-.%::4'.:-':4'S":1..::fl.::;&).„m..sM.:*i:.:I::,.::.o:.::.::'i.m:::::.:"i...„:'*:;:--:.k.:-:„•:,:&"::•.3..:..;•4..,.-i:.i•i.,:..•i:•.., :.: :,-::-,::--:.::-:-:,..::-.4:.e...-:s-.-,:t.,-:,::.-.-k-i:o.i::-:-•:::i::i.::is_:;:,::•"••,,:•:::.-.4:.,.w.4:.„,:_:;•:..:•*.a......i,.,..,--.41.,..l..h..,..„...-.:-1 AG AGRICULTURE ,,_..-: ..: • .- • • -. - . , • • \:•-•`:-..- — --r-,.'%::. , ; : • • • • . 11 .14.•,,_ . • . • • -' ... R1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL -I 7 2 _I r'.•,>-:-......„::,!.._ 1....?N' .s.,.- 1"),..,./.... •,.. ...r_. . .: Lac:, •••••••—p• . • ; . r;„ ; 3 : .., ••••44. .133 mm-DENSITY RES. R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. . .1 ,_.-...2.2_,...„...,_/..........:z./ .., .). --- ' ...5777-.....,......., . .. , • .- r _.,......, -*"...v. i , — ---.7- L ---. 1- -- r,..>:. . -. _(41,/ : - ' 1--,...,,,•....., L.--.1 ,---..- .. , :;_i , -..,,- , .„, , 44/ i B1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS 132 COMMUNITY BUSINESS '•- r- 1---• r . :-, 1...._:-.4 . -...• ‘......":4„. : ., : : • / . . .% .-- - : •-, ... --ii 1-,--1-it: i 42:k.. lj... i <..„.: ..• i .. f / i ..„. _.,..1 ',. .1-.4 t---71-, [ • ,c; t..!-1.. ,•-• ',,,i. . ""..... .. ' ..• ; , •-• • N.,, l• •\, ••=t, .. -. • f • , ..-1. '•------% —L—_______:\ B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS i * • -' `-' ' -' -•-•.. "-- .. , - ,.. ; . ....:iii:.:. i...:.--:-..-z.1.. 1:::„--___--' ,....z.,--:-- ; .... • __.1......., A----, .. -,-.-- 1.-1 .. - i 1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL r-,t2 ,:-.i.:_:,.. .174 ,..—__ ...,..., •\- ?AAA \\<;#e"... --t. .,_, - -' 1-- 7 .......,,. .r.........\1/4 \ 12 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL -,- .--es 7. : I ...‘,•-•-: Is:; ,., • ......., i ‘ 1....4----; I __________,.. ••‘: :... 1...,.1.:L.1:....... .,\--..*;.: , >s• 1 , s SSHORELAND B 1 ,.pAA 4 .---•,------ ,. . ; . : ,...1....:....-.14:-)A..........2....".... .. ! .,........._.,.... .•• , \.• . :....4, ...• .....2.... .......7 ' 1''':''•- ''..."\st•1.1 tr •'4177"‹,... 1.;'•Ilr':7.A I 9. *-",' ,• s, • -,. . •0'. : ''' . F.,4,;•;:,74& FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT1 - --- ---1.. . R 2"*`( ..*''v-*`• - . -_ . • r- 7 ?---- . , • --1" ,.. c:c.,•,___ Ilmitemil• MANDATORY PUD • • r.-,, ;.7.-,, ..!. .2,;• '...1.------' `.._.2:34....''•'c . ... I--1 ,------ t.:..1 ..... RTD RACETRACK DISTRIP11 ________,___=.=:i.....i•Ln._•==.--.:-.---- ------- ;Q. i • . I I • ...• Zoning Map i . . , City • t-,.--. * of SHAKOPE•E __ _••_ _________ #►�-4a : Suite 608 4940 Viking Drive•Minneapolis,Minnesota 55435.612-835-2808 CORPORATION January 3, 1994 The Honorable Gary Laurent and Members of the City Council City of Shakopee 129 S. Holmes Street Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: Prairie Bend (Lenzmeier) Dear Mayor Laurent and Council Members: After informal presentations to the Planning Commission and Council, Sienna believes that its revised concept plan is a better plan overall, both in conformance to the City's zoning ordinance and blending/transitioning with surrounding land uses. Sienna will shortly be reapplying with the new plan for preliminary plat and P.U.D. approval with a goal to be on the Planning Commission's February agenda. Accordingly, we are hereby withdrawing our original application for rezoning to R-2 and deletion of the mandatory P.U.D. We look forward to working with staff, Planning Commission and the Council in bringing a quality new neighborhood to the City of Shakopee. Sincerely, yi . 1 ire .aa( *11 vaS J.14.1d W. .o stop P ; -ct ,ger ) . e�d aeye)cl r cc: Dennis KraftGp4 'a-ys�e' Go�?o, a Barry Stock �o�e �e20a Lindberg Ekola t.o o,` S-ye Jim Resop f� Planners • Developers • Contractors ') R'`r � ,k LSCC.. Shakopee Valley December 27, 1993 Gary Laurent Mayor City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Mayor Laurent, Please consider our request for appointment of the Shakopee Valley News as the official newspaper for the City of Shakopee for 1994. Legal notices published in the Shakopee Valley News during this time period will be billed at the rate of$6.89 per column inch. A complete guide outlining our procedures and rate structure, as well as a copy of our certification from the Secretary of State's office which enables us to publish legal notices, is also enclosed. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you in the past. We hope that relationship can be continued in the coming year. �� Sincet�ely, Stan Rolfsrud Publisher enclosures RECOMMENDED ACTION: Valley News as the official Move to designate theShakop Shakeeee for the year 1994 . newspaper for the City of — ,� State of Minnesota 81.`!.°''° "•••.?; SECRETARY OF STATE %-` ;= .APPLICATION FOR LEGAL NEWSPAPER STATUS -,...„.!1:&44.,,,, PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE BEFORE COMPLETING THIS DOCUMENT THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE FILED AFTER SEPTEMBER 1, AND ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 31, EACH YEAR TO APPLY FOR LEGAL NEWSPAPER STATUS FOR AN ENTIRE CALENDAR YEAR. APPLICATIONS RECEIVED IN OUR OFFICE AFTER JANUARY 1.ARE EFFECTIVE FROM THE DATE WHEN THEY ARE FILED AND PROCESSED BY THIS OFFICE, 1. NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS OF NEWSPAPER: SCOTT 7n x10193 SIIA KOPF: ,TALL"TY NEWS STATE OF MINNESOTA rn ROX i DEPARTMENT OF STATE 327 VIArS11ALL r'n FILED s11AKOPEE MN 55379 NOV 181993 J- -) 2. ADDRESS OF KNOWN OFFICE OF ISSUE(complete street address or rural route and ral twynafn 13e 327 Marshall Road Shakopee Minnesota 55379 STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE 3. COUNTY: Scott 4. NAME AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF A CONTACT PERSON: Mary Tkalec ( 612) 445-3333 A 5. 7 Signa e of uthorized Person • I, Joan Anderson Growe, Secretary of State do hereby certify that the above listed publication has met the filing requirement for a legal newspaper as set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 331A.02 subd. 1(i). This authorization is effectiveazAili-ilanuary 1,or the date stamped below,whichever is later. _ _A JoanAnderson Growe Secretary of State In order to process this application for legal newspaper status you must return the completed application along with: A. The$25.00 filing fee made payable to the Secretary of State;and B. A published copy showing the date of publication,of either 1)the U.S.Post Office 2nd Class Statement of Ownership and Circulation;or 2)Statement of Ownership and Circulation verified by a recognized independent i ujation_ auditing agency. 74 08921238 Rev.10/93 � SL MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Street Light at Vierling Drive and Marschall Road DATE: December 28, 1993 INTRODUCTION: This item was tabled at the December 21, 1993 Council meeting. BACKGROUND: Staff has received a request to install a street light on the west side of Marschall Road at Vierling Drive. The existing street light on the east side of Marschall Road does not provide enough light now that Marschall Road is a 4-lane divided roadway. At night this intersection is very dark and potentially hazardous. Staff has contacted Shakopee Public Utilities Commission(SPUC)to obtain a quote for installing the light. The estimated cost is $692.16. SPUC has indicated that they could install this light within one week of receiving the notice to proceed. In 1988, the City Council discussed street lights on Vierling Drive between C.R. 16 and C.R. 17 and directed Minnesota Valley Electric and SPUC to install additional lights in this street (in addition to the standard lights at street intersections) and directed staff to fund these lights out of the Capital Improvement Fund, rather than utilize assessments. The main reasons for this decision was due to Vierling Drive being a major collector street with high pedestrian traffic and the lack of adequate lighting due to the long distance spacing of street intersections. Staff feels that this position would still apply on Vierling Drive. In addition,this intersection will be a major commercial intersection and is the intersection of a collector street and an arterial street. In regards to other safety issues regarding traffic control signs at this intersection, the Scott County Highway Engineer has confirmed that traffic signals will be eventually installed at this intersection, once the bypass ramps are open. In the interim, staff has requested that the traffic control signs in place be evaluated to see if other improvements are necessary (i.e. flashing red lights on the stop signs on Vierling Drive, etc.) ALTERNATIVES: 1. Install the street light at City cost. 2. Install the street light and assess the costs. 3. Do not install the street light. 4. Table the request for additional information. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Direct staff to have Shakopee Public Utilities Commission install a street light on the west side of Marschall Road at Vierling Drive for a cost not-to-exceed $692.16 utilizing the Capital Improvement Fund because this intersection is located in a major commercial area and is intersected by a collector and an arterial street. DEH/pmp LIGHT 1 / 4 . MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft , Acting City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, City Engineer \>v SUBJECT: Vierling Drive Street Lights DATE: November 8 , 1988 INTRODUCTION: Attached is a request from Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative regarding the installation of street lights on Vierling Drive. BACKGROUND: Last summer , staff discussed the concept of providing street lights on Vierling Drive due to its collector street status. At that time , the City Council directed staff to obtain cost estimates from both SPUC and the Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative ( MVEC ) for the installation of these additional street lights . The existing street light policy is for the developer or the City to pay for the installation of new street lights at the intersections only. Due to the fact that Vierling Drive is proposed to be a collector street with minimal accesses, staff felt that additional street lights would be warranted . The City Council agreed and consequently directed staff to obtain the cost estimates for the additional street lights. Attached is a response from the MVEC regarding the additional street lights on their portion of Vierling Drive. As indicated in their letter, the street lights would be spaced approximately 300 feet apart. This is the normal spacing that is currently provided for street lights in the part of Shakopee that is on the grid street pattern. The estimate as shown on the MVEC proposal is $10,000 .00 for placing the electric lines and street lights on this portion on Vierling Drive. The developer of Hauer ' s 4th Addition will pay for the street lights at the intersections of Emerald Lane and Jasper Road with 13th Avenue. SPUC has prepared a preliminary design for their portion of Vierling Drive, which is from Hauer' s 4th to the west. Their design is based on approximately 300 foot spacing also. This portion of Vierling Drive is not currently under any development, therefore, exact street intersections are not known at this time. Staff and the utility manager feel that street lights should not be placed on this portion of Vierling Drive until exact intersections are known. Therefore, they will be submitting a estimate to install street lights at the time that development occurs so that the placement of street lights will occur at the intersections as well as additional spacing. SPUC does feel that a street light should be installed at the intersection of Vierling Drive and County Road 17 and will be submitting a request to City Council for payment to cover this item. • If Council chooses to approve of the MVEC proposal and authorize the installation of street lights on Vierling Drive at 300 foot intervals , staff would like to remind Council that they will be committing themselves to pay for these additional street lights throughout the entire length of Vierling Drive as it goes from the east to the west along the entire route . ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Approve of the Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative request to install street lights on Vierling Drive for an estimated amount of $10 ,000 .00 . 2 . Deny the request. 3 . Request additional information or cost estimates based on some other criteria. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 , to enter into an agreement with Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative to install street lights on Vierling Drive at 300 foot intervals for an estimated amount of $10 ,000 .00 . ACTION REQUESTED; Move to direct the appropriate City officials to execute the agreement with Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative to install street lights on Vierling Drive from County Road 16 to Emerald Lane for an estimated amount of $10 ,000 .00 . DH/pmp VIERLING If Council chooses to approve of the NVEC proposal and authorize the installation of street lights on Vierling Drive at 300 foot intervals , staff would like to remind Council that they will be committing themselves to pay for these additional street lights throughout the entire length of Vierling Drive as it goes from the east to the west along the entire route . ALTERNATIVES : 1 . Approve of the Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative request to install street lights on Vierling Drive for an estimated amount of $10 ,000 .00 . 2 . Deny the request. 3 . Request additional information or cost estimates based on some other criteria . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 , to enter into an agreement with Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative to install street lights on Vierling Drive at 300 foot intervals for an estimated amount of $10 ,000 .00 . ACTION REQUESTED; . Move to direct the _ appropriate City officials to execute the agreement with Minnesota . Valley ,Electric Cooperative . to install . - • . street.-lights- Ons- Vierling Drive from County Road 16 ;_ to : Emerald . .. : Lane for an: estimated amount . of $10 ,000 .00 . •, . - - . - r-.. • VIERLING ; = - _.. lir.`"I4 i.mss � � Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative _ 20425 Johnson Memorial Dr:ve, P.O. Bcx 125 •, ..-,' ‘•!kg' Jordan, MN 55352 (612)492-2313 11 ....,.� - . . - ...w....,......,_......... ........_.,.........,,..�...... ,_ ......_.. ,_!r_r•.. . =r" 1.-:.. 1'. :3L BOARD OF DIRECTORS Dave hilt t C,r;, L3 t v Engineer City of Srla•,:,c,e,e Thomas Graham i 1a' - First Ave. Presicent t Shar.,:.,pee, M'J -,...).f,;'9 Henderson -dear Dave: Melvin Ische Vice President • Enclosed is Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative' s e_tir,at Norwood . of charges to install and extend a street liohtino syste aior:n 13th Avenue from Co. 1d. 1r: to Emerald Lane in Shakopee Edward Halloran SecretaryiTreasurer ' Le Center The lights are approximately 300' apart alternatir:a fro • either side of the street. uslr:o 35' poles witri 12 foot (,leis Myron Boegeman j arms. Either a 150 or 250 W HPS cobra head unit is ava i l a b i Shakopee j. at tre sar:le installation charge. The monthly rate would b HPS �_ -�9. %�� for a 150w and 511. �sf for a 250w HPS. MVEC wil John Warner maintain the system orovidir:g re-lamDir:D and normal reoair a New Prague I no extra cost to the city. MVEC would own the lights an wire system and provide normal maintenance for the rate. (.1 Rodney Marekdo not see the need for a conduit system, therefore, r::, cost Montgomery have been included. . George Stauff Kilkenny • The costs provided are based on areas ore-graded but no- ; sodded or Planted with trees. Keep in mind that construc- John Carlson t ion between November 1 and May 1 is sub iect to winte' Henderson charoes. A c,Doy of the street olar:s would be heloful in corn- - Dieting this installation. We need to determine where tnf Donald Frankhauser E: l ichts and wire are to _be installed in the boulevard. If re- Savage t storation is necessary, we would suggest that the city handl' this end of it, rather than Day for linemen to do lar:dscaoin: GENERAL MANAGER or re-soddir:u. . Roger Geckle( Thank you for contacting us for inout on the prolect. It is r understandin,a other proposals sals are being solicited on this or,: sect as well. Please keep in mind, the project is clear within !AVEC' s assigned service area and that we would 0000- any proposal which would not include plans for the C000erati' to provide the Dower, for this system. Please call us if y, have any Questions. We look forward to working with you. • Very truly _yours, " .MINN-S0 . VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE a/ on Jabs Coordinator Developments/L,:,rl' 1 Accounts Enclosures Please Sign And Return White Copy With Your Payment As Soon As Possible •,-. arg:. MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ;w1` _ .;,.y, S 20425 JOHNSON MEMORIAL DRIVE1-Ar'�; , JORDAN. t\". X5:52 %` JP l0?21 492.23i3 REQUEST for ELECTRIC LINE INSTALLATION or ALTERATION Date October i4 , 19s,` We, the undersigned. agree to pay S10 , 000 . 0 0 for placing 4 : 2 0e feet of electric lines in accordance with the sketch below. payable to the Cooperative prior to installation. Modification of the aereed upon route, or circumstances, may require revision of cost. This contract is only valid during the current construction year beginning March 1st of each year and subject to chance thereafter. Winter charges will be due in advance on underground services graded and ready to energize from Nov. 15thru May 15. X • sionawre I _ SKETCH - 1 1 2 l. s/ :—.14,- / R it' • rs4 7.E _ r %11 ti\ �?� %..._/ \� rf z • • I ;III i — (i;— /'_ / :ir:. ..sj r.,..2 <-1t%�,/ `i F ... -� ... I _.L i / <� •/ ,,,77::11.7/:,, ,_, 6 1 . tt ,\ ice : ' ------- ----- !`~:: (/• {,t j�..c '•�ti�__=J �i / c / 1"coli . — - •.I• Y._...1 -. _• ' KIK �i.t !y x J r X17 • f�� �z-(- _enn-› -n. —� /1 n �J nn ... ._.n,.. 1•.l!1 1.1..n. _ Please Sign And Return White Copy With Your Payment As Soon As Possible -- O11 ';' MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE -�, . -*i `: 2G-2 JOHNSON !JEV.ORIAL DRIVE 411r.;;". ..; R^:;"d. I.'•N 55352 J. '. « (6',27 492.2313 REQUEST for ELECTRIC LINE INSTALLATION or ALTERATION Dale Octcber 14 15E•S We, the undersigned. agree to pay S1o , coo . oo for placing 4 , 2CC feet of electric lines in accordance with the sketch below. payable to the Cooperative I prior to installation. Modification of the agreed upon route, or circumstances. may require revision of cost. This contract is only valid during the current construction year beginning March 1st of each year and subject to chance thereafter. Winter charges will be due in advance on underground services graded and ready to energize from Nov. lsthru May _s. Y signature SKETCH - - -"--'• if pril—f—fAC 1\ ;X„,, ! 4?... / 3 '41 < / "' 01 3 .i . .._., , !xi I / t.:..• 1.4,47 , .:C i .. I_ 4. ./ r :\ 5:71--(---.--.1.—.--7-. .z. �/�1 s� . 7.7._4 \_114.. _ . ._ ' 9 7"--- I "--I j. 1 - %., ' t... -•/- - :s 7-; 1• ;7`rt i E.( I • ; . ::::: =/_, / ' 1::;':-- / -t / 7:—. .:"g.' ;.Z----.%---7,S1. .6. F2 I. _-- — • --,':.-“--.N)/ — _ tom / �1:--, 1/I7.:71,,,,, - Iis , f La:, 51'; :,.. ..K_____-______Ii/ . "T":- ., ,. ii-41:-.----f----,4.--:::::—,------7--------.----------------- .. ' -..-_ , N - i I ! ) I.; :.- 1 ''.--- cz: -- ___:-. .... • .z,. • / -7-4 .',..,..,. :=3/. -i \ . . t ; _�-• �_. 1 l lv _ / � - _ _ ., Jj = _--'_Y__. t� � ,yam cYrr. • :' wr `� I IN f if ✓ -F_' - ll)c MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft , City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, City Engineer SUBJECT: Vierling Drive Street Lights DATE: November 29 , 1989 INTRODUCTION: Attached are two bills from the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission regarding the installation of two street lights at separate locations on Vierling Drive . BACKGROUND: The normal practice for both the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission and the City of Shakopee is to install street lights at intersections only. Since Vierling Drive will be a collector street with a minimal number of intersecting streets , staff did not feel that this would be an acceptable level of lighting for this street. In 1988 the City Council of Shakopee discussed this idea and agreed that additional street lights should be installed on Vierling Drive at approximately 300 to 400 foot intervals. In discussing these additional street lights with the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission , it was agreed upon that the City of Shakopee would pay for the additional street lights above and _ beyond the intersecting streets. Consequently, that portion of Vierling Drive between C. R. 16 and Limestone Drive had additional street lights installed on it which were paid for by the City of Shakopee. It was decided that the additional street lights on Vierling Drive would be constructed as development warrants it. Shakopee Public Utilities has installed two additional street lights on Vierling Drive at two separate subdivisions and has submitted the attached bills to the City for payment. One street light is in the Meadows Subdivision and the other street light is in Heritage 2nd Addition Subdivision. Both of these lights are at intervals beyond the intersecting streets in order to comply with the overall street lighting plan of Vierling Drive . Shakopee Public Utilities is now requesting reimbursement for the cost to install the street lights. As stated in the attached bills, the cost is $700 .00 for each light for a total cost of $1 ,400 .00 . ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Approve of the request and direct staff to reimburse Shakopee Public Utilities $1 ,400 .00 for installation for two street lights on Vierling Drive . 2. Deny the request. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 . ACTION REQUESTED: Move to direct the appropriate City officials to reimburse Shakopee Public Utilities for the installation of two street lights on Vierling Drive for a total of $1 ,400 .00 . DH/pmp LIGHTS CUNSEAIT lSci . MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director A SUBJECT: I/I Study �, DATE: December 29, 1993 INTRODUCTION: Attached is the final Infiltration and Inflow Study as prepared by Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. BACKGROUND: The City of Shakopee has retained Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. to prepare a Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. This plan consisted of four separate elements, one of which was to update the 1982 Infiltration and Inflow (I/I)report. The remaining three elements of the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan are 95% complete, but the final reports are dependent on the outcome of the Chaska Interceptor negotiations. The I/I study has been completed and a copy is attached for City Council review. Basically, the 1982 I/I report indicated that the only area where the City had excessive I/I was in the River District drainage area. Therefore, this 1993 report concentrated on that part of Shakopee. Updating the 1982 I/I report was one of the goals of the draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan. Attachment No. 1 is a copy of Page 24.2 of this Comprehensive Plan and policy SS-C indicates that the City would address the I/I issue in the Central District/River drainage area. Attachment No. 2 is the summary of the 1993 I/I report outlining the conclusions and recommendations. Basically, the report concluded that I/I exceeds the allowable limits only during certain times of the year when the Minnesota River is up. But if the I/I is analyzed for the entire year, the average I/I is below the maximum limits. Based on this, the most cost effective solution is to "do nothing" and continue to pay for the excess I/I as part of our treatment costs at Blue Lake. If that is unacceptable to the City or the MWCC, other improvement options such as reconstructing, lining or chemical sealing the River Interceptor were evaluated. A cost analysis of each improvement was prepared and as shown on the chart on Page 21 of the report, the next most cost effective solution rather than paying to treat the I/I is chemical sealing. The report also indicates that a section of the interceptor (between manholes 20 and 28) should be reconstructed under any of the alternatives due to its poor condition and pipe settlement. This section of interceptor is between the old 169 Bridge and Market Street. The report also indicates that the interceptor is on the downside of its 50 year service life (currently 30 years old) and the pipe should be carefully monitored to determine when complete rehabilitation will be necessary. Staff is requesting that the City Council adopted the 1993 I/I Plan. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Move to adopt the updated I/I report dated December 6, 1993. 2. Table the request. 3. Do not adopt the report. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to adopt the Infiltration and Inflow Study dated December 6, 1993 as prepared by Short- Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. as the City of Shakopee's official policy regarding Infiltration and Inflow. DEH/pmp INFLOW ATTACHMENT NO. 1 a) 0 W N 4-) C r-1 N 0 U) 0 a) O >, 4 (4a S 4 0 -r-I RI U) •-I UJ RI ca a) 4 cc) 4-) r-1 RI cl-c to O w a) 4a '0 a) U) a) (U v (U >~ Z3 U) C '0 O Ul O of '0 N 0 )-1 3a f-1 a) .c 4-) a, 0 (U ONS a~ 3a 0 b' a)-4-1 O 4 RI N RI .N C >1 '0 .I) 0 RI •ri RI •ri •ri 0 1~ a) Sa 0 0 RI g )i •.) •--I U) 4J 4•) a) (1) 0 .Q '0 a) U) r-1 >, •-) .0 RI r-1 a) ITN to S-1 P4 U) 0 '0 C •r1 (1) N .0 0 C r-1 C -I) 0 4. a) )4 4 3 •ri 0 g C a) a) U a) 0 O 4 •r-1 4) N a) RI = (1) 4. •r-1 a) 4 bN 0 a) > U) N 4.1 0 a) 11:3 •1-1 S-1 SA !~ RS S-1 > 4 RS r 4 r-1 4-1 4-) 0 S-1 U) C .Q r-I S4 0 .4 •ri 4) RS •ri a) .0 a) 134'0 34 S-I '0 4-1 X 4 •r 1 r-4 0 )-i 04 r-1 0 RI 0 RI > •ri a., 0 '0 •N .4" C (aU 00 3 t0) 0 •4 N (U 0 U) a O)04 C•Hi rI-1 0 cL,4 )4 'S r-I N 0 '0 113 U) X UO) rO 0 C 4 � • W H-1 0 0 •4 C 3 a) 3 � 4 '0 '� i (U '-I rciU • r--I a) (1) • r-1 C N 4-) 4) N U) 0104-) C •44 >-44 •ri C C CO 4-1 4-) 1~ '0 U) -ri •ri 4-) 4-I 0 •r-I C •ri 4-1 f6 U) •r1 (1) '0 R3 •I-) C )~ '0 4-1 0 0 C 0 Ql 4-) 0 0 0 C 004-400) 0 .0 •r1 3 4) 4 a) )~ •r 1 O O) '0 r-I 0 0 r-I O) g )-1 g O C C a) 3 Q4 co 4-) g O) P U) (U d-) 0 U 0 4) Q (U 4-1 W RS '0 •r•1 -r1 al r-i O 0 g C a) 0 ar •,4 N C 4-) (U )-1 N .>~ .Q S?a••-I >~ 0 -P O ON 1:3 a 0 4 S2 0 1]0'-1 2, r-1 W01 C WP >, Ul U) >,•ri Ul -ri b" U) a) U Rs a) 0 -r4 R3 4 a+.O 0 W 4 U a)•ri 4. 4 a) U) • •ri ri +) U a) g 0 >4r-1 4) r-I U) 4 S•1 0 N 0 a) 4 EI '0 g U) EI 4) C to r-1 •ri -ri )-t S-1 N (U CWC W C 4 W >, C )-1 4) 4 C-r1 03 RS C O W Z R3 r-1 C a) 0 • (a U) > (a 3 4 - 3 4.) as 0 ,-i ,--1 3 O •ri C O .0 -ri 0 `0 4 O U U) 4-) 4) 0 a) (1) a+ S-I a) •r-1 0 0 U) )a 4-1 • •rl a) • 3-1•rl 4) •ri•r-I VI Q g O .Q -'i a) •ri .0 4 '0 X O U) U S-i EIC 0 0 3 .0 U) a) '0 03 •) 03 4-1 .N RS S-1 f. )~ ri 4-) 4i O 4-) 0 0 04 O RI >,.0 a) a) 0 >'a RS U! N a) 4.1 ri a+ RI O 4.) a, N a) 4.4 C 0 S i >,r-1 .0 ri +) 4) r-I a) 4) O S•1 a) a) RI 34-1 r-1 0 .Q a) 0404"0t) a) a) •ri .s~ W 0 0 '0 4-1 r4 0 U r-1 ri .t~ )a S-1 a) 0 (U N S-1 .1:2 O a) C-r-1 5-1 0 .C: 4 )i N '0 0 0 C U >r RI V) 0 r-1•ri }1 r-I 0 0 N V) r-1 .0 0 S-+ a) RI -4 0 )-t 4 a) X C 4 •44•rl 4-)-rt•r.1 S-1 g 0 41 •ri N •I-) a) C Q U) 0 4--) .- x 4) 4-) CO 4) .C: 0 RI a) U) Sa•4-1 .0 4-) 0 0 C 4-+ 4-I RI 0 +) 0 +) 0 0 a) a) U) 0 4) '0 N .i-) (U 4 'CS +) U C a) U) SA -ri 0 C a) 4-1 -44 a) N RI 4 >~ • a+ S 1 w•ra-c 0 a+ - U 0 0•N a) 4-)•'-4 0 4-4 -'0 U). r1 a) a) 0 4-) 0 tI+-- RI N 0 '0 0Xri0CC r-1 Ca r. U) S4U3RSa) )1Q) ri 4 )~ 4.1 '00 U a) S-1 g >, a) 0 .0 a) r-I 4-) (U •r-1 •ria -0 ,Q 0 0 0 4-) 4-) O 3-1 RI 4-) 0 '0 •ri 70 a) •r 1 a) (U r-1 •r1 tT Cr) •ri C .0 RS 0 ri 0 P r-1•r1 0 •ri a) •r1 .0 U) C > (U 5-1 RI --rir1 TS 4 tc/) (U -r4r1 al 3 C 44-�r1 0) 4) 34 g N W 0 Z ar 0 3 W Z C IO.1 'O C •- •S�1 U 0 C •I-) r-1 • 0 >,•ri 3 '0 RI •L) •ri N > .Q ••••IN N }) g. •r1 U 0 U) .Q RS 0 a) N C O C •-) •.0 I-a r-1 $4Z -1-) 00) 0 C W • 4J .Q 0 U) 0 4-1 4-) • C C•r•l N a) CI N 0 •ri r-I CA RI 4-) O .4" a 04-1 to N •ri • 3-1 N U >a RI CO a-) •ri d' •ri •44 RI '0 a) U .X RI RI ri U -) 4 0 - )•1 a-) O 0 Lc) a+ )a O) S•1 N 33 0 N 41) -4-1 OW O • OU E-1 C }A - aP WI04C4 N -POC g or-1NA • 3:14-1) 0 3 C C > a) .0 S-1 RI I~ C 4 4-) RI 0 O a) -ri .I) C r-1 -r1 )a RS U) ar 0 W •ri 0 0 RI .0 EI Ei '0 )-1 •ri 4) r-I >, U U U) •r1 W ri a, C 4.1 W a) 0 s; 3 .0 N S-1 ri fa +) >-, C b' 0 a) - 0 )•1 0 ON Q+ O 0 4 Sa N •ri 4-) -1-) N M 0 a 0 4) 4 RS 0 4a 4-1 C 0 N 2, 0 0 CI) C C 4-1 a) 4.4 •ri 43 0 •r1 a.) 0 0 -ri • a) •r1 S'a O•ri C )-1 g S-1 O .0 fa•ri W RS r•1 0 4) a) ca >•1'0 0 .Z g r-1 0 0 4) r-1 a 3 O > 0 •ri C C 0 NEI RI N 4.) .0 O N C r I a) U) •rl 0•e-1 0 •,-1O a.,•U .0 U) a, 0 C N aEh 3) P• • r-1 0 40a) ri 0 > 4) 4) 4) MOW to a) H W-�rl .0 304-3 = U) 0 •ri RI U) OW al a) r-4 co •J S4 ri • C a) •r-1 04 0) 41 3 (U > 4) C C -P .0 4-1 C >,.4 a) 4 • RI U) -ri r-1 U a) a) f 1 4-) 4) a) N-ri >,H O) 0 0) U) 3 5-1 RI 0 cz X 0 >, O) to a+ I; a) .0 U 0 a) O O) .C2 '0 4-( U) r-I 0 'OM .0 0 C ri 0 R3 .0 4) O W S-1 4 C '0 •r1 (I-I g >'a •i.) W 4) 0 4-) )-I r-1 .Q C .a •r4 ril O )a •ri C) 4 3 (0 EI 4-) CO .SG a+•,•1-r1--1 C 0 0 a) .0 RI 40 ri 00 0 H N 4) U) )-1 S-1 0 0 C •ri TS RI 0 U en U) 4 Q. U1 4 41 •,4 g R3 ri O N (d O OC4) a) 04OEIOCC4-1a) .CrCRI 0 C W 00 0 0) 0 10 H -l04 )a C EP -4-1000OP U) 4-) 0 4 >1004'0 >1 4-) W0 -44) W S-I A 0 U I C 0 C Z ' N U) •ri '0 4 0 4 .i2 -r1 g .s~ Q 4 .4 4-) •4-1 RI N 0 S4 cU O C N U r1 O a) .X ›-Ig 4-1 a) a) 4- U) S4 4 0 U CC 4J C C r-I Pi .sG 0 0 E O U) -1 0 0 4) •r1 0 C 4) a) 0 '0 RI U) 4- 0 0 0 0 -ri -,.i a) U) >,r 1 P C 0 ri x al 0 -r1 ri •.-1 (U 4.1 4 C O) C N +) U •r1 C g 4 +) '0 r-I (U ,'}",• O to >, o 0 as h a+U >, 1~ 0 o 4- •ri --1 '0 to (U SA 4) •ri U) +) 0 N W W 3 (U TS r-i a.w RI O S-1 4J S4 •ri 0 4-1 S✓ C •r1 ---4-1 0 0 W 0 ri N > 0 El 3 C a) 0 EI h Ul C aC Qf 0 -44 O) '0 0) 4-1 .0 -ri .ri (U to N )1 a4 )a ---.--1 C O •ri -4-1U) 4-1 (U g -- (U -r1 (U .4' 3 U i-1 C P 0 E 4- r-1 (U C a4 4-14-) 4-) H25044-) 4- LI) XI CO O •.i (U r4 4-) .0 0 C '0 4-) N +)U) 0 '0 0 N S-1 •O C )4 N •r1 -rl O U) )-1 S-1 a) '0 3 0 U) U) R3 W C 0 .0 C C • Z3 a) 0 U •N a+ 4a 3 as • a) a.,4.1 '0 tx •r.i•ri IIs 0 4) W 4 4) ri .J 0 0 '0 a) as •ri 4 '0 -ri (U a, C C 0 -4-1 3 4-I (U W >-1,-I 4-) r-1 Q. 41 U 3; •i) (U 4) •ri a) g 0 .) 0 '0 (0 RI •r1 >, )a '0 4-1 O a) N 3 4) 0 0 C co O a) 0 ar 0 '0 a• N N a) S-1 -P a) 0 •r-I 4 4) a+ a) 0 N C a) P -r.I a, O) •ri owN P ar )a 0 0 N -ri co g 0•ri U (U U a) H •ri 4 '0 4) W -ri TS r•i C 4 a) -1 Cl) U 0 R3 r-i a+ O 4) r-i V) X 0 Cr o 0Z (U 00 P U) a) C) U4-1 C -00 A •ri P •ri C g U) a) a) •ri ri .1-) r i (U r-1 U) •n N C a) a) I~ W 0 (U W +) 0 >4 0) 4) U) N 0 4 a+--1 O )a •r1 a+ > a) P Zs 0 I-+ +) a) P RS C tT 1:4 400 •..i 444004C0 C >1 > PO4 )1003 wow 40X404 (00 Q EI .'Z )-1 r-1 Ei 4) U) 0 '0 4) RS I~ H U) a) 0 P -P a, as P (U -ri '0 s; P H )a W4) 14-14.) 0 )a H H z co ■ ■ ■ ■ (U .Q 0 `0 I I I I U) co U) U) U) U) U) U) co ATTACHMENT NO. 2 Section 1 Conclusions and Recommendations 1.1 Conclusions 1. In 1980, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) established guidelines with an upper limit of 1500 gallons per day per inch pipe diameter per mile of pipe (gpd/in/mi) of infiltration and inflow (I/I) to help in determining whether or not a community has potentially excessive I/I. I/I in Shakopee's River t District Trunk Sewer has a history of exceeding the USEPA's guideline of 1500 gpd/in/mi, as indicated in the 1982 I/I Study. The fluorometric I/I testing completed in 1992 confirmed that I/I rates in all segments of the River District Trunk Sewer continue to exceed the USEPA's guideline during certain periods of the year. 2. The draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan suggests a policy to implement I/I reduction measures when I/I comprises more than 20% of the total flow of a sewer. The I/I rates measured during 1992, though greater than the USEPA's guideline, are significantly below 20% of the total flow of the River District Trunk Sewer. 3. The River District Trunk Sewer televising showed a number of active leaks, roots at some joints, significant pipe settlement, offset joints, low flow velocities, and .1 considerable sediment in some areas. Surprisingly, most of the pipe sections themselves are still structurally sound. 4. It appears that the amount of I/I observed in the River District Trunk Sewer has a direct correlation to the stage of the Minnesota River. This indicates that much of the I/I is attributable to infiltration due to seasonally elevated groundwater. During periods of extremely high river stage, submerged manholes may also contribute inflow to the River District Trunk Sewer. 1 5. Pipe settlement, accumulation of sediment, and excessive I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer have contributed to surcharged flow conditions extending over 1000 feet upstream of the Rahr Malting discharge during normal operation of Rahr Malting. 6. Results of the fluorometric testing suggest that infiltration is suppressed when Rahr Malting is discharging to the River District Trunk Sewer. Hydrostatic pressure on the outside of the main due to an elevated water table is equalized by the heavy flow inside the main. 7. The most cost effective improvement alternative is the "do nothing" alternative. The cost of this alternative would he the cost of treating the I/I. However, treating the I/I is not considered a long-term solution to the 1/I problem because of likely changes to MWCC treatment rates specifically aimed at encouraging removal of I/I. _.I J 8. Chemical sealing appears to he the next most cost effective alternative for Ill reduction. Chemical sealing is not considered a permanent alternative due to the need to periodically repeat the procedure. J I/1 Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 1 w.l ATTACHMENT NO. 2 9. The segment of the River District Trunk Sewer located in Huber Park between the old T.H. 169 bridge and Market Street (from manhole 20 to manhole 28 on Figure 3) has settled significantly. This segment should be reconstructed under any permanent improvement alternative. r� 10. Slip lining the River District Trunk Sewer with a polyethylene liner is considered a J permanent improvement alternative. However, it would result in an estimated capacity reduction of about 12% and would cause a surcharged condition of approximately 6.1' over the top of the pipe at the most critical location. Although the elevations of basements along the River District Trunk Sewer are unknown at this time, it is likely that this amount of surcharge would be unacceptable due to the possibility of flooding basements. 11. Under the reconstruction alternative, the River District Trunk Sewer from manhole 25 (RD12) to manhole 37 (ED01) would be increased in size from a 21" diameter to a 24" diameter to accommodate the projected ultimate peak flow (as identified in the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan) without surcharging. The reconstruction alternative has a higher cost than the polyethylene liner, the chemical sealing, or the "do nothing" alternative. 1 12. The polyester resin impregnated liner has the highest cost of the improvement alternatives. Flow capacity after installation may be as good or better than the original capacity. 1.2 Recommendations 1 1. Review the I/I policy suggested in the draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan regarding implementation of remedial measures when I/I comprises more than 20% of the total flow. Consider either lowering this standard below 20% (to be more consistent with the USEPA's 1980 guidelines) or stipulating that the I/I removal proceed only when financially feasible. 2. Funding for a solution to the I/I problem should he sought so that it is available if treating I/I becomes a less cost-effective solution. (Treatment rates may be changing to encourage more removal of I/I.) 3. Continue to monitor the evolution of"no-dig" processes and their suitability for this project. Informal bids could occasionally he obtained from contractors on chemical l sealing, slip lining, etc. This would allow for periodic updates of the estimated costs given in this report and review of the financial feasibility of I/I removal. 1 4. Complete an inspection of each property within the River District to determine compliance with ordinances on sump pumps, roof leaders, and foundation drains, since reduction of I/I originating on private property is usually the most cost 1 effective I/I to remove. 1 ■ IlI Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 2 -44 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 5. Rahr Malting's ability to attenuate their flows to unk Sewer should be monitored by the City. If Rahr Malting can reduce their peak istrict rflow to the River District Trunk Sewer, the City may be able to more seriously consider slip lining should it significantly become cost effective. (At the present time, slip lining is unacceptable because it significantly reduces the pipe capacity.) 6. At this time,the"do nothing"improvement alternative should be continued t nued because it is the most cost effective. However, the chemical sealing alternative could be further investigated. The City may wish to chemically seal a small segment of the River District Trunk Sewer and use it as a trial section. 7. The physical condition of the River District Trunk Sewer should be carefully ' monitored during routine maintenance. Information contained in this report should be used to help identify manholes and castings which may need repair, areas where root cleaning is needed, and locations where manholes are particularly subject to inflow due to their susceptibility to flooding. This sewer is already over 30 years old and is approaching its design life of 50 years. Complete rehabilitation may become necessary due to deteriorating physical condition, even if not cost effective from an I/I removal standpoint. I I I 1 J l ISI Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 3 Update of 1982 Infiltration and Inflow Study City of Shakopee Minnesota SEH No. SHAKO2056.00 December 6, 1993 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC . =SEN M ULTIDISCIPLINED. SINGLE SOURCE. Update of 1982 Infiltration and Inflow Study City of Shakopee, Minnesota SEH No. SHAKO2056.00 December 6, 1993 — I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. David F. Simons DATE: I — 6C-\R3 REG. NO: 19.9• AA,j`j42" REVIEWED BY:,K,/ DATE: December 6, 1993 _ Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 3535 Vadnais Center Drive St. Paul, Minnesota 55110 (612) 490-2000 _Acsai 5909 BAKER ROAD,SUITE 590,MINNETONKA,MN 55345 612 931-9501 FAX 612 931-1188 ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION L L December 6, 1993 RE: Shakopee, Minnesota L Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan SEH No.: A-SHAKO2056.00 L L City of Shakopee Atm: Mr. Dave Hutton, P.E. City Engineer/Director of Public Works 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee MN 55379 In accordance withY our authorization,we have prepared the attached Update of the 1982 Infiltration and Inflow (I/I) Study. The information presented in this report is intended to supplement the Comprehensive L Sanitary Sewer Plan which is currently being prepared for the City of Shakopee. This report discusses the I/I in the River District and the improvement alternatives which were considered for the River District Trunk Sewer. LWe would be pleased to review this report with you in greater detail at your convenience. Sincerely, k ,"1/4,jie Lgel R. Boxrud, P.E. Project Manager Lymb L SHORT ELLIOTTMADISON. WI HENDRICKSON INC. ST PAUL,MN ST CLOUD.MN CHIPPEWA FALLS,WI Table of Contents Certification Page Letter of Transmittal Table of Contents Section 1 — Conclusions and Recommendations 1 _ 1.1 Conclusions 1.2 Recommendations Section 2 — Introduction 4 2.1 Authorization _ 2.2 Resources 2.3 Purpose Section 3 — Background Information 6 3.1 River District 3.2 Minnesota River Stages 3.3 MWCC Lift Station L-16 3.4 Rahr Malting Section 4 — Approach 11 4.1 Condition of River District Trunk Sewer 4.2 Measuring I/I Rates 4.3 Evaluation of Alternatives Section 5 — Results 13 5.1 River District Trunk Sewer Televising 5.2 Fluorometric Flow Analysis 5.3 Comparison of I/I Rates 5.4 MWCC System-Wide Evaluation of I/I Section 6 — Improvement Alternatives 18 6.1 General 6.2 Reconstruction 6.3 Polyethylene Liner 6.4 Polyester Resin Impregnated Liner 6.5 Chemical Sealing 6.6 No Improvement I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page i Section 7 — Cost of Alternatives 21 7.1 Cost Summary 7.2 Comparison of Alternatives Tables Table 1 Reference Stages of Minnesota River at Shakopee 8 Table 2 Results of March 22, 1992, Flow Testing 15 Table 3 Minnesota River Stages and I/I Rates 16 Table 4 Volume of I/I in Spring of 1992 20 Table 5 Cost Summary of Improvement Alternatives 21 Figures Figure 1 Location of River District 7 _ Figure 2 Stage of Minnesota River at Shakopee, March - April, 1992 9 Figure 3 River District Trunk Sewer during 1992 Televising 14 Appendix Al Cost Estimates for Improvement Alternatives A2 TV Inspection Logs of River District Trunk Sewer, 1977 A3 TV Inspection Logs of River District Trunk Sewer, 1992 A4 Fluorometric Study of I/I in River District Trunk Sewer, 1992 I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page ii Section 1 Conclusions and Recommendations — 1.1 Conclusions 1. In 1980, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) established Lguidelines with an upper limit of 1500 gallons per day per inch pipe diameter per mile of pipe (gpd/in/mi) of infiltration and inflow (I/I) to help in determining L whether or not a community has potentially excessive I/I. I/I in Shakopee's River District Trunk Sewer has a history of exceeding the USEPA's guideline of 1500 gpd/in/mi,as indicated in the 1982 I/I Study. The fluorometric I/I testing completed L in 1992 confirmed that I/I rates in all segments of the River District Trunk Sewer continue to exceed the USEPA's guideline during certain periods of the year. L 2. The draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan suggests a policy to implement I/I reduction measures when I/I comprises more than 20% of the total flow of a sewer. The I/I rates measured during 1992, though greater than the USEPA's guideline, are Lsignificantly below 20% of the total flow of the River District Trunk Sewer. 3. The River District Trunk Sewer televising showed a number of active leaks, roots at some joints, significant pipe settlement, offset joints, low flow velocities, and Lconsiderable sediment in some areas. Surprisingly, most of the pipe sections themselves are still structurally sound. L4. It appears that the amount of I/I observed in the River District Trunk Sewer has a direct correlation to the stage of the Minnesota River. This indicates that much of the I/I is attributable to infiltration due to seasonally elevated groundwater. During L. periods of extremely high river stage, submerged manholes may also contribute inflow to the River District Trunk Sewer. L5. Pipe settlement, accumulation of sediment, and excessive I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer have contributed to surcharged flow conditions extending over 1000 feet upstream of the Rahr Malting discharge during normal operation of Rahr L Malting. i 6. Results of the fluorometric testing suggest that infiltration is suppressed when Rahr LMalting is discharging to the River District Trunk Sewer. Hydrostatic pressure on the outside of the main due to an elevated water table is equalized by the heavy Lflow inside the main. 7. The most cost effective improvement alternative is the "do nothing" alternative. The cost of this alternative would be the cost of treating the I/I. However, treating Lthe I/I is not considered a long-term solution to the I/I problem because of likely changes to MWCC treatment rates specifically aimed at encouraging removal of I/I. L8. Chemical sealing appears to be the next most cost effective alternative for I/I reduction. Chemical sealing is not considered a permanent alternative due to the Lneed to periodically repeat the procedure. L In Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 1 9. The segment of the River District Trunk Sewer located in Huber Park between the old T.H. 169 bridge and Market Street (from manhole 20 to manhole 28 on Figure 3) has settled significantly. This segment should be reconstructed under any permanent improvement alternative. 10. Slip lining the River District Trunk Sewer with a polyethylene liner is considered a permanent improvement alternative. However, it would result in an estimated capacity reduction of about 12% and would cause a surcharged condition of approximately 6.1' over the top of the pipe at the most critical location. Although the elevations of basements along the River District Trunk Sewer are unknown at this time, it is likely that this amount of surcharge would be unacceptable due to the possibility of flooding basements. 11. Under the reconstruction alternative, the River District Trunk Sewer from manhole 25 (RD12) to manhole 37 (ED01) would be increased in size from a 21" diameter to a 24" diameter to accommodate the projected ultimate peak flow (as identified in the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan) without surcharging. The reconstruction alternative has a higher cost than the polyethylene liner, the chemical sealing, or the "do nothing" alternative. 12. The polyester resin impregnated liner has the highest cost of the improvement alternatives. Flow capacity after installation may be as good or better than the original capacity. 1.2 Recommendations 1. Review the I/I policy suggested in the draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan regarding implementation of remedial measures when I/I comprises more than 20% of the total flow. Consider either lowering this standard below 20% (to be more consistent with the USEPA's 1980 guidelines) or stipulating that the Ill removal proceed only when financially feasible. 2. Funding for a solution to the I/I problem should he sought so that it is available if treating I/I becomes a less cost-effective solution. (Treatment rates may be changing to encourage more removal of I/I.) 3. Continue to monitor the evolution of"no-dig" processes and their suitability for this project. Informal bids could occasionally be obtained from contractors on chemical sealing, slip lining, etc. This would allow for periodic updates of the estimated costs given in this report and review of the financial feasibility of I/I removal. 4. Complete an inspection of each property within the River District to determine compliance with ordinances on sump pumps, roof leaders, and foundation drains, since reduction of I/I originating on private property is usually the most cost effective I/I to remove. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 2 5. Rahr Malting's ability to attenuate their flows to the River District Trunk Sewer should be monitored by the City. If Rahr Malting can reduce their peak flow to the River District Trunk Sewer, the City may be able to more seriously consider slip _ lining should it significantly become cost effective. (At the present time, slip lining is unacceptable because it significantly reduces the pipe capacity.) 6. At this time, the "do nothing"improvement alternative should be continued because it is the most cost effective. However, the chemical sealing alternative could be further investigated. The City may wish to chemically seal a small segment of the River District Trunk Sewer and use it as a trial section. 7. The physical condition of the River District Trunk Sewer should be carefully monitored during routine maintenance. Information contained in this report should be used to help identify manholes and castings which may need repair, areas where root cleaning is needed, and locations where manholes are particularly subject to inflow due to their susceptibility to flooding. This sewer is already over 30 years old and is approaching its design life of 50 years. Complete rehabilitation may become necessary due to deteriorating physical condition, even if not cost effective from an I/I removal standpoint. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 3 Section 2 Introduction _ 2.1 Authorization On August 20, 1991, the Shakopee City Council, acting on the recommendation of the Consultant Selection Committee, selected Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) to prepare a Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan (CSSP). One of the tasks which was included in the CSSP was to update the 1982 Infiltration and Inflow (I/I) Study. 2.2 Resources The resources used in the preparation of this update include the following: 1. Infiltration and Inflow Analysis, 1982 2. Sanitary Sewer Capacity Report, 1974 3. Shakopee Lift Station Facility Plan, 1992 4. Minnesota River Stages from Army Corp of Engineers, 1992 5. City of Shakopee Existing Sanitary Sewer System Database, 1993 6. MWCC Flow Records for Lift Station L-16, 1992 7. TV Inspection Logs of River District Trunk Sewer, 1977 8. TV Inspection Logs/Video of River District Trunk Sewer, 1992 9. Fluorometric Study of I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer, 1992 10. Information on MWCC System-wide Evaluation of I/I, 1992 11. Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities, 1990 L23 Purpose The 1982 Infiltration and Inflow Analysis made the general statement that the City of L Shakopee had potentially excessive I/I. In that study, the sanitary sewer system was divided into nine districts by the use of temporary flow meters so that evaluations could be made of each district. The analysis indicated that only one district out of the nine L actually had potentially excessive I/I. The district was located along the Minnesota River from Adams Street on the west to the MWCC Lift Station L-16 on the east. It was known as the River District. Other districts had I/I but most of the I/I was attributed to L inflow into holes in the manhole covers which were typical throughout Shakopee at that time. L Since 1982, the City of Shakopee has been using manhole covers with concealed pickholes on all new sanitary sewer manholes and has also replaced many of the older castings. Some of the older sanitary sewer lines have been reconstructed in conjunction with other projects. In addition, many improper connections to the sanitary sewer system L (e.g. roof leaders, sump pumps, etc.) have been disconnected. Based on this progress and the findings of the 1982 Ill Study, city staff requested that this update deal L exclusively with the River District. The River District Trunk Sewer is known to be particularly suspectable to I/I, especially when the river is high. L I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 4 Another reason for analyzing the I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer is the capacity problem that has been experienced at MWCC Lift Station L-16. A combination of high discharge levels by Rahr Malting and significant I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer have contributed to the lift station experiencing flows which exceed the design capacity during certain periods of the year. The 1992 Facility Plan for improvements to the MWCC Lift Station L-16 suggests that the lift station will need to be upgraded in the near future to accommodate a larger flow. Removal of the excess I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer could reduce peak flows at the lift station. Finally, the I/I problem needs to be periodically analyzed to determine if I/I reduction can be cost effective for the City. With escalating wastewater treatment costs and new "no-dig" sewer rehabilitation techniques being developed every year, I/I reduction can become cost effective where not previously cost effective. In addition, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has discussed several I/I incentive/disincentive programs which could eventually result in additional charges to those communities with potentially excessive I/I. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 5 Section 3 Background Information 3.1 River District The River District is shown in Figure 1. The sanitary sewer system in the River District _ consists of the River District Trunk Sewer and several lateral sewer mains which pick up flow from the Central District and West District. The River District Trunk Sewer is constructed of reinforced concrete pipe and ranges in size from 15" in diameter on the west end to 21" in diameter on the east end. Until 1960, the sewage flow from the City was discharged directly into the Minnesota River through several collecting sewer lines. At that time, a primary sewage treatment facility was constructed (at present site of Lift Station L-16) and the River District Trunk Sewer was added to intercept these outlets and convey the waste to the new treatment plant. The River District Trunk Sewer was initially designed with a 1.0 MGD reserve capacity for wastes from Rahr Malting Company, which was subsequently connected to the system in 1967. The River District Trunk Sewer runs parallel with and is directly south of the Minnesota River. In several areas, the trunk sewer comes within 30 feet of the river. The 1974 Report on Sanitary Sewer Capacity states that segments of the River District Trunk Sewer were installed in bedrock below the water table. 3.2 Minnesota River Stages MWCC records indicate that the flow at Lift Station L-16 increases when the stage of _ the Minnesota River increases. Based on this observation, it is probable that the stage of the Minnesota River has an impact on the I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer. Table 1 shows some of the highest river stages recorded at Shakopee. Figure 2 shows the river stages during March and the first half of April, 1992. The River District Trunk Sewer was televised and analyzed for I/I over this same period, so the river stage was monitored closely during this time. All information on river stage was obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers. The Corps has records dating back to 1939. Previously, they had a gaging station at Shakopee _ which was located downstream of the T.H. 169 bridge. However, that gage was subsequently discontinued. Levels at Shakopee now must be interpolated using the USGS Jordan Gage and the Corps' Savage Gage at Port Cargill. Ill Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 6 „ ,/ tc / i 1 • ` f I ow Q� f —\ „?.1= / is.... i' a)O— r — r fy '\ I J .s pV) 1—. I V ) 1 ) ,_ 5. / l! ' oopp ' - I I t { 11 ° j'`` fq �,-� / 1 L ceE ' r 1- I '�\ / 1 I tLo y IPi . .1 \N_---/ 1 r——1 0 . n S' F§ '5 s i `` I v F $ E $ Np5 EEEKHE— -. : / 1 I RI 8••I ! ' A tal aS '.: 1 0 p I: w ) � � z I O 1 r JJ 1 ul a 0 1 L -. s In $r /\ � I .. �� i —��_� \� '�L i liiiih. 7” to IL.� N WI \c/ a \ r� J'tli I ,/ 21 i — 'Nvk v I r ;i Z v t 1 z L .�_, .� /� — a `t� l‘ U� f i \\ F<gvl �4/ � __ t t /\R�`t I/ `� W` r ` \ `_may )- + pi iU / I:s 5 / t- \i i— it. ti 4 g o iI soa �� O X05 \ .�1` \ c41 g ° \ \.; — R5I \:-/ 1 — �__.J TABLE 1 Reference Stages of Minnesota River At Shakopee Approximate Maximum Elevation Year AMSL 1952 717 1965 722 1969 720 1986 711 1992 708 1993 718 I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 8 IIl0 co — / o m Q) - 0) 0 0 > ( c o ci _rT ,- E W — 7 c0 N >• . co 0 cn o & J as0ca n- � 007 LL o c 0 a. c a ca a < c ai13 E n f E'-93 Q 0 . . . o ai _ U 0 c) 5 D 0 Z (/) 0 . _ai oaj — r r CO C) i2 0 CB t 4'7 ca N 01.-) N — • CC C7) N al 1— co. CD O 'i. , 8/ i 0 ca. Q C I 2 U O CZ CU 0) cC1 4-0 I'. "-- 1.- CC CC I C. N N CU L . 0) LL . , Nr:;: I T- 1f CD t1) 0 (0 0 L0 0 0 0 0) 0) CO — 1SINV lead in uoUenao aania eloseuu!W 4o e6e's 3.3 MWCC Lift Station L-16 MWCC Lift Station L-16 is located on the east end of the River District Trunk Sewer. This lift station has been the subject of recent study by the MWCC. In 1992, the MWCC completed a study entitled "Shakopee Lift Station Facility Plan." The study indicated that the design capacity of L-16, as well as the River District Trunk Sewer, had been routinely exceeded during periods of peak I/I flows caused by wet weather in conjunction with periods of peak production by Rahr Malting. Because of this fact, the Facility Plan recommended the construction of a new submersible lift station at the site which would increase the rated capacity of the lift station from 2500 gallons per minute (gpm) to 3700 gpm. The River District Trunk Sewer is the largest of the two trunk sewers which make up the total flow to Lift Station L-16. The other trunk sewer is a 12-inch diameter main which serves the East District and is located further to the south away from the river. Because the lift station takes flow from both directions, MWCC pumping records could not be used to directly measure flows in the River District Trunk Sewer. However, MWCC records for Lift Station L-16 were analyzed and it was found that peak flows at the lift station closely coincided with peaks in the stage of the Minnesota River. 3.4 Rahr Malting Rahr Malting's facility is located near the west end of the River District Trunk Sewer. Rahr Malting's flow is a major component of the flow in the River District Trunk Sewer. For this reason, the River District Trunk Sewer televising and flow testing work which was completed in March and April of 1992 had to coincide with periods of low flow from Rahr Malting. This made the calculation of a base flow difficult since Rahr discharges almost continuously and at different rates during different parts of the day. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 10 — Section 4 Approach 4.1 Condition of River District Trunk Sewer Part of the scope for this study was to determine the condition of the River District Trunk Sewer so that improvement alternatives could be evaluated. The River District Trunk Sewer had been televised in 1977 by Solidification, Inc. The television inspection logs from 1977 are included in the Appendix of this report. However, a video tape of the 1977 televising was never saved. Therefore, detailed information on the location, size, and condition of leaks was not available. The City recognized the value of having a current video tape of the sewer, and decided to have the River District Trunk Sewer retelevised in 1992. Solidification, Inc. was hired to complete the televising work based on their previous experience with this particular sewer. The television inspection logs of the 1992 televising are also included in the Appendix of this report. 4.2 Measuring I/I Rates Several alternative methods of measuring I/I were considered for this study. The method used in the 1982 Study involved the installation of temporary flow meters to measure flows in both the dry weather and wet weather periods. The measured flows were then compared to theoretical flows which had been calculated from water usage records. That portion of the measured flow that was larger than the theoretical flow was considered to be I/I. This is not an actual measurement of I/I but is more of an approximation. However, it is a good way to estimate I/I for larger segments of a collection system. A more direct and accurate way to measure I/I in a pipe is to measure the flow at each end of a segment. The unsubstantiated increase in flow between the end points is considered I/I. Flow inputs between the two end points need to be either plugged or measured at the point where they enter the line. This method is normally used during wet weather periods and is typically done during the night when sewer services are not being used and laterals can be plugged without causing significant backups. The latter method was chosen for this study. The cost and accuracy of various flow measuring devices were compared (e.g. V-notch weirs, Parshall flumes, ultrasonic depth measuring devices, etc.) and it was determined that the fluorescent dye procedure (fluorometrics) was the preferred method of flow measurement. The determination of the flow rates by a fluorescent dye analysis is based on the principle of conservation of mass. A dye solution of known concentration (Ci) is injected at a constant rate (Qi) upstream of the monitoring locations. Flow rates are determined at each monitoring point by analyzing wastewater samples for dye concentration (Cs) and calculating flow rates via the equation (Qi)(Ci) = (Qs)(Cs). Using this method, the River District Trunk Sewer was analyzed for I/I on March 22, 1992. Pace Laboratories (SEC Donohue) was contracted to do the testing because of I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 11 their extensive background with fluorometrics. A report prepared by Pace Laboratories is included in the Appendix. 4.3 Evaluation of Alternatives The next step in the process was to evaluate the suitability of various improvement alternatives for the River District Trunk Sewer. Reconstruction, lining, chemical sealing, and no-improvement options were reviewed. Reconstruction and lining were considered permanent solutions, while chemical sealing was considered a temporary solution. The cost of the alternatives were compared over a 50-year period using 8% interest. The result of this comparison is given in Section 7, and the detailed cost estimates can be found in the Appendix. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 12 Section 5 Results 5.1 River District Trunk Sewer Televising The televising was done on March 23, April 1, April 2, April 6, and April 8 of 1992. Televising was intended to be completed coincident with the springtime peak river level so that leaks due to the high river level could be detected on the video. Televising would have been done on the day that the river reached its peak (March 11, 1992) except that the televising crew could not access the manholes due to surcharged flow conditions. Even during the periods of lowest discharge from Rahr Malting, the sewer remained in a surcharged condition between March 11, 1992 and March 22, 1992. As the river began to drop, flows subsided enough to allow the crews to obtain access to the main on March 23, 1992. Figure 3 is a graphical summary of the 1992 televising information obtained on the River District Trunk Sewer. The following information is shown in Figure 3: _ • Service locations • City's manhole number • Televising manhole number • Areas where the mains had settled and were somewhat below the original grade (camera partially submerged) • Areas where the mains had settled extensively (camera completed submerged) • The manhole rim and pipe invert profiles as shown on construction record drawings • The elevation of the river on the day that the televising took place for each particular reach of the main • Locations of active leaks that could be detected from the TV video The televising indicated that the structural characteristics of the pipe were surprisingly good. The problems occurred at the joints. Many of the joints had settled or opened allowing roots to penetrate the main. The main had settled significantly in some areas, and joints had become badly offset. Some of the service taps were protruding or full of roots. Many of the reaches contained several inches of sediment and/or rocks up to five _ inches in diameter. Overall, the tape showed a high amount of standing water in the main. The televising records showed that some reaches contained grease, calcium, and detergent build-ups on the inner walls of the main. Most of the leaks which were observed in the main were located east of the T.H. 169 bridge. This could have been due to the stage of the river being at or above the main on the days that the easterly end of the River District Trunk Sewer was televised. The absence of leaks observed on the west end of the River District Trunk Sewer could have been because the river was below the main on the days that the westerly end was televised. Some of the heavy leaks were estimated to be flowing at up to 5gpm. (See photos 9 and 10 in the back of the 1992 televising report, Appendix A3.) I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 13 L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 14 5.2 Fluorometric Flow Analysis The flow testing was performed during low flow conditions in the early morning hours of March 22, 1992. The flow testing was originally scheduled to coincide with the peak river stage which occurred on March 11, 1992, but the surcharged conditions prevented manhole access. A detailed description of the flow testing is given in the Appendix. A brief summary of the results is provided in Table 2. TABLE 2 Results of March 22, 1992, Flow Testing* Pipe From To Distance Pipe Size I/I Velocity Capacity Manhole Manhole (feet) (inches) (gpd/in/mi) (ft/sec) I/I(cfs) (cfs) %I/I 3 8 1149 15 1500 1.13 .0076 2.76 0.3 (RD44) (RD35) 12 25 2681 18 3608 0.73 .0510 3.65 1.4 (RD25) (RD12) 25 37 3999 21 3006 1.21 .0740 4.21 1.8 (RD12) (ED01) `The section between manhole 8 and manhole 12 was excluded from the study due to unpredictable flow inputs from Rahr Malting and inaccessible manhole locations. The following observations were made during the fluorometric flow analysis: — • The measured I/I ranged from 1500 to 3608 gpd/in/mi. These rates are excessive considering that Ten States Standards recommends a maximum allowable infiltration rate of 200 gpd/in/mi for new construction and many municipal codes limit the acceptable infiltration rate to 100 gpd/in/mi for new construction. The USEPA's 1980 guideline was 1500 gpd/in/mi for determining whether or not a community had potentially excessive I/I. • The average measured flow velocity ranged from 0.73 to 1.21 fps with the pipe flowing less than half full during low flow hours. These values are low and indicate that an accumulation of solids will continue to occur when the pipe is flowing less than half full. However, a cleansing velocity of greater than 2.0 fps is expected to occur daily minimizing additional sediment buildup. • Several inches of accumulated solids were observed within all manholes which were entered. • Surcharged flow conditions were observed in manhole 2 (WD45R) approximately 1000 feet upstream of the Rahr Malting discharge input under normal operation of Rahr Malting. This implies that Rahr's discharge may be backing up the line. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 15 • Significant inflow was observed in manhole 25 (RD12) through several holes on the west side of the manhole just above the crown of the upstream pipe. • Figure 3 of the fluorometrics report showed an increase in flow rate from the start of testing for Section 1. This testing occurred immediately after Rahr Malting's discharge ended. The increase in flow rate suggests that infiltration may be suppressed when Rahr Malting is discharging into the River District Trunk Sewer. 5.3 Comparison of I/I Rates The 1982 I/I Study indicated that the peak seven day I/I period in the River District occurred between May 18, 1982, and May 24, 1982. The average I/I rate over this period was measured to be 4860 gpd/in/mi. This same report estimated that the maximum peak seven day I/I rate occurred between August 30, 1979, and September 5, 1979, with an average I/I rate of about 5855 gpd/in/mi. In contrast, the maximum I/I rate measured on March 22, 1992, was 3608 gpd/in/mi between manholes 12 (RD25) and 25 (RD12). The difference in I/I between the three time periods listed above could be due to the different river stages and/or the rehabilitation work that was done by the City since 1979. Table 3 lists the river stages and I/I rates for the various time periods discussed above. TABLE 3 Minnesota River Stages and I/I Rates Stage of Approximate Minnesota River I/I Rate Date at Shakopee (gpd/in/mi) September 3, 1979 706.0 5855' May 21, 1982 697.1 48602 March 22, 1992 704.2 3608' 'Estimated in 1982 I/1 Study. 'Measured in 1982 I/I Study. 'Measured in 1993 Update of 1/1 Study. 5.4 MWCC System-wide Evaluation of I/I During 1991 and 1992, the MWCC conducted a system-wide evaluation of I/I in the Metropolitan Disposal System. Approximate I/I figures for each community were estimated based on metering information obtained by the MWCC for the years of 1989 and 1990. The results of the MWCC study indicated that Shakopee had a relatively low peak ratio during 1989 and 1990. The peak ratio was defined as the average of the three highest peak day flows divided by the average daily flow. The peak ratio was a measure of each community's susceptibility to I/I. Shakopee's peak ratio was in the 1.0 - 1.5 range, which I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 16 was relatively low compared to adjacent communities such as Eden Prairie, which had a peak ratio in the range of 2.5 — 3.0. The MWCC estimated that the average ground water infiltration during 1989 and 1990 was about 739 gpd/inlmi in sewer mains owned by the City of Shakopee. The average of the three highest rainfall dependent I/I peaks during 1989 and 1990 was about 1580 gpd/in/mi in sewer mains owned by the City of Shakopee. These I/I Rates were lower than the instantaneous I/I rates measured by the fluorometric analysis on the River District Trunk Sewer. This is because the MWCC I/I rates were average rates for all sewer mains owned by the City of Shakopee, which would include new (tight) mains and mains above the water table. This suggests that Shakopee's citywide I/I rate is relatively low and the City's past efforts to reduce I/I have been beneficial. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 17 Section 6 Improvement Alternatives 6.1 General The results of the televising and the fluorometric flow analysis show that the River District Trunk Sewer is in need of improvement if the I/I rate is to be reduced to a level which is below the recommended allowable I/I rate. Reconstruction, lining, chemical sealing, and the no-improvement option were analyzed to determine their suitability for this application. A description of each alternative is given in this section. Estimated costs are given in Section 7. 6.2 Reconstruction Under this alternative, the River District Trunk Sewer would be removed and replaced from manhole 1 (WD01) to manhole 37 (ED01). The total length of reconstruction would be 9100 feet. The pipe sizes and grades would be the same as the original installation, except for the segment from manhole 25 (RD12) to manhole 37 (ED01). This segment would be increased in size from a 21" diameter to a 24" diameter to accommodate the projected ultimate peak flow as identified in the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan without surcharging. This alternative would include a new jacked crossing under the old T.H. 169 bridge. Bypass pumping would be required during the entire reconstruction. 6.3 Polyethylene Liner Several different types of liners were investigated for the River District Trunk Sewer. A "U-Liner" (tight fitting polyethylene liner) was determined to be unsuitable for the River District Trunk Sewer because it is only manufactured in sizes up to 15" in diameter. Slip lining using a loose fitting, high density polyethylene pipe has some potential for this type of an application. Slip lining would involve excavating insertion pits at _ approximately 800-foot intervals and pulling an undersized liner through the existing main. The roughness coefficient of the liner is less than that of concrete pipe, which tends to increase the capacity of the pipe. However, installation of a loose fitting liner significantly decreases the diameter of the pipe which decreases the capacity. The result is a net reduction in the capacity of about 12%. The wall thickness of the liner is designed to withstand hydrostatic pressure due to rising river levels and internal pressure under surcharged conditions. Bypass pumping and cleaning of the main would be necessary for the slip lining procedure. Excavation of service wyes would also be necessary to make the service connections. Ill Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 18 L The segment of the River District Trunk Sewer located in Huber Park between the T.H. 169 bridge and Market Street (from manhole 20 to manhole 28 on Figure 3) has settled significantly. Slip lining of this segment would not solve the problem of low velocities and excessive deposition of solids. Therefore, the cost estimates have been based on the reconstruction of this segment in Huber Park, rather than slip lining. L 6.4 Polyester Resin Impregnated Liner L Polyester resin impregnated liner is another type of pipe liner that is sometimes used in applications such as this. Insituform is the most widely used polyester resin impregnated liner. The impregnated liner material is fed into the main through the manholes, forced into the pipe under pressure, and is chemically bonded to the interior of the pipe through an inversion process. Insertion pits are not required. Prior to installation of the liner, the main is cleaned and televised to locate service locations. After installation of the liner, a remote controlled cutter is sent through the pipe to cut holes in the liner at �. the service locations. Flow capacity after installation may be as good or better than the original capacity. LAs with the polyethylene liner, the cost estimates have been based on the reconstruction of the segment located in Huber Park, rather than lining. L 6.5 Chemical Sealing L Chemical joint repair is accomplished from the inside of the pipe by locating the deteriorated area via a TV camera and pumping a chemical grout into the area to seal off any leakage. The sealed leak is then pressure tested. Pipe cleaning and bypass pumping is necessary during the process. The advantages to chemical sealing are the relatively low cost and the fact that no Lexcavation is necessary to complete the chemical sealing. One of the disadvantages to chemical sealing is that roots and hydrostatic pressure may L eventually push the chemical sealant back into the pipe over a period of time. Although there are documented cases where certain types of chemical sealing have been in place over 20 years without the need for repair, the cost comparisons in this study include the cost of a replacement sealing at 10 years, and an extra televising inspection at 10 years, 1, so as to be more comparable in value to the other alternatives. L Other disadvantages are that it is sometimes difficult to obtain a satisfactory pressure test, and the cost of chemical sealing is difficult to estimate prior to actually doing the work. L„ In the pipe rehabilitation industry, chemical sealing is typically thought of as a temporary alternative solution to the problem. Since it is not a permanent solution like L reconstruction or lining, it is not considered equal to these alternatives. For this reason, it was not felt necessary to include the cost for reconstruction through Huber Park with the chemical sealing alternative. L L I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 19 L L6.6 No Improvement 1 The "no improvement" alternative consists of paying the cost for the treatment of I/I. According to the MWCC, the average sewage treatment cost for all users in 1992 was $1155 per million gallons of sewage. This cost is expected to increase annually by 1-2% Lover and above the cost of inflation. Table 4 shows that the approximate volume of I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer in L the spring of 1992 was 3.14 million gallons (MG). Based on information received from the Army Corps of Engineers, it is not unusual to expect a fall peak in the Minnesota River level similar to the spring peak level. Assuming a similar peak in the fall, the total L volume of I/I from the spring and fall peaks would be approximately 6.28 MG. Using a factor of 1.5 to account for additional I/I throughout the rest of the year, or for higher I/I rates when the river level is higher than when measured, the total estimated volume L. of I/I that would be generated in a typical year would be about 10 MG. Using the average sewage treatment cost of $1155 per MG, an estimated $12,000 would be spent by the City of Shakopee to treat I/I in a typical year. LThe costs given in the next section for treating the I/I are based on an annual increase in treatment cost of about 2% per year (over and above the cost of inflation). L TABLE 4 Volume of I/I in Spring •of 1992 L Measured L. I/I Rate Number''' Reach of River March, High Low Average of Days River Volume of UI, District Trunk 1992 Invert Invert Invert was Within 1' Spring, 1992 Sewer (GPM) Elevation Elevation Elevation of Pipe Invert (MG) LRD 45 to RD 44 1.2' 708.09 707.13 707.61 2 0.0035 RD 44 to RD 28 3.4 707.13 704.27 705.70 15 0.0734 L. RD 28 to RD 25 9.7' 704.27 703.35 704.16 20 0.2794 RD 25 to RD 12 22.9 703.35 700.05 701.70 28 0.9233 L RD 12 to ED 01 33.2 699.80 696.18 697.99 39 1.8645 LApproximate Total Volume III = 3.14 MG 'I/I was not measured on these segments, but was estimated using I/I rates measured on adjacent segments. 2Assumes a one foot gradient on water table from trunk sewer location towards river. L3Based on river stage shown in Figure 2. L L L I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 20 Section 7 Cost of Alternatives 7.1 Cost Summary Table 5 gives a cost summary of the improvement alternatives. The detailed cost estimates are found in the Appendix of this report. In the calculation of present worth and equivalent annual cost, routine inspection and cleaning costs were not included if they were common to all alternatives. TABLE 5 Cost Summary of Improvement Alternatives' Alternative Present Worth' Equivalent Annual Cost' Initial Cost Reconstruction $875,000 $72,000 $875,000 Polyethylene Liner3.4 $610,000 $50,000 $610,000 Impregnated Liner' $975,000 $80,000 $975,000 _ Chemical Sealing $475,000 $40,000 $260,000 Treat I/I $195,000 $16,000 $12,000 'All costs include 10% contingencies and 25% overhead. 'Present worth and equivalent annual cost based on 50-year period and 8% interest for all alternatives. 3Results in an approximate 12% reduction in capacity. 4Includes reconstruction through Huber Park. 7.2 Comparison of Alternatives Treating I/I appears to have the lowest equivalent annual cost of the improvement alternatives. However, treating the I/I is not a solution to the problem, and I/I will only continue to increase over time. Chemical sealing appears to be the most cost effective of the remaining alternatives. In the past, chemical sealing has not usually been considered a permanent solution to extensive infiltration problems. However, with some installations now being in place over 20 years, this may be a good interim solution that could be considered for the River District Trunk Sewer. Slip lining with a loose fitting polyethylene liner is the next most cost effective alternative. The disadvantage to slip lining is the estimated capacity reduction of about 12%. This would result in a surcharged condition at ultimate development of the River District. The amount of surcharging would be approximately 6.1' over the top of the pipe at the most critical location. Although the elevations of basements along the River District Trunk Sewer are unknown at this time, it is likely that this amount of surcharging would be unacceptable due to the possibility of flooding basements. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 21 The next most cost effective alternative would be reconstruction. One of the advantages of reconstruction would be the opportunity to increase the size of the River District Trunk Sewer between manhole 25 (RD12) and manhole 37 (ED01) to accommodate the _ projected ultimate peak flow without any surcharging. Finally, the polyester resin impregnated liner appears to be the most expensive alternative. This type of liner is best suited for large sewer mains having few services and located in an area where there is significant restoration costs involved with reconstruction. I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Shakopee, Minnesota Page 22 APPENDIX Al COST ESTIMATES FOR IMPROVEMENT ALTERNATIVES _ Shakopee, Minnesota Present Worth and Equivalent Annual Cost of Alternatives for River District Trunk Sewer I. Present worth and equivalent annual cost calculations were based on a 50-year life analysis and 8% interest. No salvage value was assumed at the end of the 50-year period. II. Reconstruction,lining,and chemical sealing cost calculations assumed that all I/I was removed due to the improvement. III. Costs that would be common to all alternatives were not included in the analysis: _ A. Manual inspection every 5 years @ $1,000/inspection. B. Thorough cleaning every 10 years @ $12,000/cleaning. C. Televising beginning at 20 years and occurring every 10 years thereafter @ $6,000/televising. IV. Reconstruction A. No additional costs within 50 year life so present worth equals initial cost. B. Equivalent annual cost = $875,000 x (A/P, 8, 50) = $875,000 x 0.08174 = $71,523. V. Polyethylene Liner A. No additional costs within 50 year life so present worth equals initial cost. B. Equivalent annual cost = $610,000 x (A/P, 8, 50) = $610,000 x 0.08174 = $49,861. VI. Polyester Resin Impregnated Liner A. No additional costs within 50 year life so present worth equals initial cost. B. Equivalent annual cost = $975,000 x (A/P, 8, 50) = $975,000 x 0.08174 = $79,697. VII. Chemical Sealing A. Assume one additional televising is required at 10 years. B. Assume resealing is required every 10 years. _ C. Present Worth = $260,000 + $266,000 x (P/F, 8, 10) + $260,000 x (P/F, 8, 20) + $260,000 x (P/F, 8, 30) + $260,000 x (P/F, 8, 40) = $260,000 + ($266,000 x 0.46320) + ($260,000 x 0.21455) + ($260,000 x 0.09938) + ($260,000 x 0.04603) = $476,801 D. Equivalent annual cost — = $476,801 x (A/P, 8, 50) = $476,801 x 0.08174 = $38,974 VIII. Treat I/I A. Assume that the main will need to be spot repaired on an emergency' basis every 5 years @ $5,000. B. Assume that one additional televising will be required at 10 years. C. Based on information provided by the MWCC, the cost of sewage treatment is expected to increase by about 1-2% per year over the rate of inflation. This equates to an average increase of about $29 per year per million gallons of sewage, or $290 per year for the estimated 10 million gallons of I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer in a typical wet year. D. Present Worth = $11,550 x (P/A, 8, 50) + $290 x (P/G, 8, 50) + $5,000 (P/F, 8, 5 to 45 by 5) + $6,000 x (P/F, 8, 10) = ($11,550 x 12.2330) + ($290 x 139.5928) + ($5,000 x 2.0640) + ($6,000 x 0.46320) = $194,872 E. Equivalent annual cost = $194,872 x (A/P, 8, 50) = $194,872 x 0.08174 = $15,929 Shakopee, Minnesota Reconstruction of River District Trunk Sewer Preliminary Cost Estimate _ Unit Total Description Unit Oty. Price Price Mobilization L.S. 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 Temporary Bypass Pumping L.S. 1 30,000.00 30,000.00 Remove Sanitary Sewer L.F. 9,100 5.00 45,500.00 Remove Sanitary Manhole Each 35 100.00 3,500.00 - Temporary Fencing L.F. 9,100 1.50 13,650.00 Bale Checks Each 250 6.00 1,500.00 Clear and Grub Acre 7.5 3,000.00 22,500.00 - Crushed Rock Pipe Foundation Ton 2,205 7.00 15,435.00 Agg. Base, Cl. 5 C.Y. 210 16.00 3,360.00 Replacement Backfill Ton 2,205 4.00 8,820.00 _ Traffic Control L.S. 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 Jack-Bore 18" Carrier in 30" Casing L.F. 130 250.00 32,500.00 2" Bituminous Restoration S.Y. 856 6.00 5,136.00 15" RCP 0' - 10' Deep L.F. 1,130 25.00 28,250.00 - 15" RCP 10' - 15' Deep L.F. 470 29.00 13,630.00 18" RCP 0' - 10' Deep L.F. 3,091 26.00 80,366.00 18" RCP 10' - 15' Deep L.F. 790 30.00 23,700.00 -- 24" RCP 0' - 10' Deep L.F. 2,209 32.00 70,688.00 24" RCP 10' - 15' Deep L.F. 660 38.00 25,080.00 24" RCP 15' - 20' Deep L.F. 750 44.00 33,000.00 Standard Manhole, 8' Depth Each 35 900.00 31,500.00 - Excess Depth Standard Manhole L.F. 82 100.00 8,200.00 Temporary Barricades L.F. 48 28.00 1,344.00 4" PVC Service Pipe L.F. 155 6.00 930.00 - 4" PVC Riser Pipe L.F. 40 12.00 480.00 Service Connection Each 31 100.00 3,100.00 Silt Fence Preassembled L.F. 9,100 $2.00 18,200.00 - Salvaged Topsoil C.Y. 3,850 6.00 23,100.00 Sodding, Lawn Type S.Y. 21,506 2.00 43,012.00 Seeding Acre 3.0 250.00 750.00 _ Seed, Mixture 600 Lb. 200 6.00 1,200.00 Mulch Material, Type 1 Ton 6 170.00 1,020.00 Disk Anchoring Acre 3.0 85.00 255.00 _ Wood Fiber Blanket S.Y. 10,000 2.50 25,000.00 Comm. Fertilizer Analysis 12-12-12 Lb. 310 1.00 310.00 Subtotal $635,016.00 - 10% Contingencies 64,984.00 Subtotal $700,000.00 25% Eng., Legal, Admin. 175,000.00 - Total Estimate: $875,000.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Polyethylene Liner (With Reconstruction Through Huber Park) Preliminary Cost Estimate Unit Total Description DAt Qty. Price Price Mobilization L.S. 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Cleaning and Polyethylene Liner L.F. 6,734 40.00 269,360.00 Temporary Bypass Pumping L.S. 1 10,000.00 10,000.00 - Remove Sanitary Sewer L.F. 2,362 5.00 11,810.00 Remove Sanitary Manhole Each 7 100.00 700.00 Temporary Fencing L.F. 2,366 1.50 3,549.00 - Bale Checks Each 36 6.00 216.00 Clear and Grub Acre 2.0 3,000.00 6,000.00 Crushed Rock Pipe Foundation Ton 661 7.00 4,627.00 Traffic Control L.S. 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 18" RCP 0'-10' Deep L.F. 748 26.00 19,448.00 18" RCP 10'-15' Deep L.F. 470 30.00 14,100.00 24" RCP 0'-10' Deep L.F. 868 32.00 27,776.00 24" RCP 10'-15' Deep L.F. 220 38.00 8,360.00 24" RCP 15'-20' Deep L.F. 60 44.00 2,640.00 Standard Manhole, 8' Depth Each 7 900.00 6,300.00 - Excess Depth Standard Manhole L.F. 25 100.00 2,500.00 Temporary Barricades L.F. 32 28.00 896.00 4" PVC Service Pipe L.F. 15 6.00 90.00 - 4" PVC Riser Pipe L.F. 8 12.00 96.00 Service Connection Each 31 100.00 3,100.00 Connect to Existing Manhole Each 2 150.00 300.00 Silt Fence Preassembled L.F. 2,366 2.00 4,732.00 - Salvaged Topsoil C.Y. 1,010 6.00 6,060.00 2" Bituminous Restoration S.Y. 505 6.00 3,030.00 Agg. Base, Cl. 5 C.Y. 210 16.00 3,360.00 - Seeding Acre 2.0 250.00 500.00 Seed, Mixture 600 Lb. 143 6.00 858.00 Mulch Material, Type 1 Ton 4 170.00 680.00 - Disk Anchoring Acre 2.0 85.00 170.00 Wood Fiber Blanket S.Y. 7,000 2.50 17,500.00 Comm. Fertilizer Analysis 12-12-12 Lb. 209 1.00 209.00 Subtotal $440,967.00 10% Contingencies 49,033.00 Subtotal $490,000.00 - 25% Eng., Legal, Admin. 120,000.00 Total Estimate: $610,000.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Polyester Resin Impregnated Liner (With Reconstruction Through Huber Park) Preliminary Cost Estimate Unit Total Description Unit Qty Price Price Mobilization L.S. 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Cleaning and Impregnated Liner L.F. 6,734 80.00 538,720.00 Temporary Bypass Pumping L.S. 1 10,000.00 10,000.00 Remove Sanitary Sewer L.F. 2,362 5.00 11,810.00 Remove Sanitary Manhole Each 7 100.00 700.00 Temporary Fencing L.F. 2,366 1.50 3,549.00 - Bale Checks Each 36 6.00 216.00 Clear and Grub Acre 2.0 3,000.00 6,000.00 Crushed Rock Pipe Foundation Ton 661 7.00 4,627.00 - Traffic Control L.S. 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 18" RCP 0'-10' Deep L.F. 748 26.00 19,448.00 18" RCP 10'-15' Deep L.F. 470 30.00 14,100.00 24" RCP 0'-10' Deep L.F. 868 32.00 27,776.00 24" RCP 10'-15' Deep L.F. 220 38.00 8,360.00 24" RCP 15'-20' Deep L.F. 60 44.00 2,640.00 Standard Manhole, 8' Depth Each 7 900.00 6,300.00 - Excess Depth Standard Manhole L.F. 25 100.00 2,500.00 Temporary Barricades L.F. 32 28.00 896.00 Connect to Existing Manhole Each 2 150.00 300.00 - Silt Fence Preassembled L.F. 2,366 2.00 4,732.00 Salvaged Topsoil C.Y. 1,010 6.00 6,060.00 2" Bituminous Restoration S.Y. 505 6.00 3,030.00 Agg. Base, Cl. 5 C.Y. 210 16.00 3,360.00 Seeding Acre 2.0 250.00 500.00 Seed, Mixture 600 Lb. 143 6.00 858.00 Mulch Material, Type 1 Ton 4 170.00 680.00 Disk Anchoring Acre 2.0 85.00 170.00 Wood Fiber Blanket S.Y. 7,000 2.50 17,500.00 Comm. Fertilizer Analysis 12-12-12 Lb. 209 1.00 209.00 Subtotal $707,041.00 10% Contingencies 72.959.00 Subtotal $780,000.00 25% Eng., Legal, Admin. 195,000.00 Total Estimate: $975,000.00 Shakopee, Minnesota Chemical Sealing of River District Trunk Sewer Preliminary Cost Estimate Unit Total Description ni Oty. Price Price Mobilization L.S. 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Cleaning and Joint Sealing L.F. 9,100 18.00 163,800.00 Bypass Pumping L.S. 1 15,000.00 15,000.00 Subtotal $188,800.00 10% Contingencies 21,200.00 Subtotal $210,000.00 25% Eng., Legal, Admin. 50,000.00 Total Estimate: $260,000.00 APPENDIX A2 TV INSPECTION LOGS OF RIVER TRUNK SEWER, 1977 SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT ,°tr �'►Z 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: Move-rnber lo, 1977 PAGE NO, 1 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of `;h lkopee 11P7 PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: .uue ON: right of wary ,:nuth of river FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 15 Inches (dia.) _ ar Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC x Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt X Other easement MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical — , X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream -- _. -- Film Photo r REMARKS IFt. , No. CO MH 2 75-90 Low pipe 1-7" low 102 Offset joint 3/8-1/2" side 113 Small roots in joint 1 208 Offset joint 3/8-1/2" side 313-323 Low pipe 1-2" 39C MH 3 Grade and :.tructure good TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC, �%o,t 'C4 DATE: Nc-vembcr 16. 1977 PAGE NO. 9 — 620 Cottonwood Lane ,; iFOR: City of ''h- i:onee Minneapolis, MN 55441 PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: ,ame ' •� / ON: ri-lit nt t• y �:sh of ,-iter — /' i FROM: TO: , LINE: SIZE: 15 Inches (dia.) _iii Ft. (length) SANITARY DEPTH: Ft, PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old t7 Years TYPE: Clay PVC y Concrete _ Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: ;; Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt X Other eaement MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good _ Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped _ Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream -" Ft. Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS LFt, No. — t . ( , Mui 3 — 12-2(' Lou nine 1-?" lot: 80-1(14 Low ni.oe 2-j" 95 He vv roots in Joint 9 130-146 Low nine 2-3" low — 184 Haavy root,: in joint Z 7C9 Light root:: in joint 250-'56 High length of pipe 'i-)6 1iH 4 _L Lot of dirt iz bottom of pipe first 50_ fr. _from Mui L. Grade margin:11; structure good. L 1 SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT o,.O'� 'C.1,, DATE: Novemh�: 16, 'i 620 Cottonwood Lane1 7 PAGE NO. 3 � = Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of `hikor,ee 71V : alif PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same 4,1ON: right of way south of river 11 FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 15 Inches (dia.) 377 Ft. ( length) X SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay _r PVC ?" Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt X Other easement "- MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical -- X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: • Upstream X Downstream Fc, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. 0(' M'1 4 1? Wife joint 19n! Light roots in joint (typical) 4 202 Light root ; in joint 230-23E Low pipe 1-2" low 238 High joint 288 Se.vice R tap 5 310 Root; in joint 35,' Lot: joint 377 MH 5 Grade and !,tructure good. TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC. IC4s 620 Cottonwood Lane 0 DATE: 'Ir.vt•t::ber )X , 11i77 PAGE NO. 4 ._ o` z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: ('i t•: cf PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: : me 4i�1 ON: ri• t of t.' :v • outh of river _ 11� -•hFROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 15 Inches (dia.) 91 Ft, ( length) SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete - Asphalt X Other ea::ement -- MANHOLE CONDITION: X GoodFair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft. Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS PFt. No. ( OO MF ` fir .t 50 feet quite dirty; probably from wAter back up from 1?" line from Rah,- 92 MH 7 Grade and st:-ucture appear good; line dirty '-' SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT cot 'C., DATE: c 620 Cottonwood LaneNovember 161977 PAGE NO. 5 " Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same ON: right of way south of river FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: is Inches (dia.) _113 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM AGE: New x Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: y Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt x Other easement MANHOLE CONDITION: Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical -- g Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: g Upstream Downstream Ft, Fr, Film Photo M,H, REMARKS 1Ft. No. 00 MH 7 09 Small roots in joints 32 . Small roots 62 Offset joint 1" tap 6 • 113 MH 6 Grade and structure good • TV INSPECTION REPOR1 SOLIDIFICATION, INC, y. °�� '�';i 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 17, 1977 PAGE NO. 6 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: (*.try of Shlknnee V. PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: ,,.Mlle .A ON: right of way 5_nuth of river _ A FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: lc Inches (dia.) 188 Ft. ( length) X SANITARY L DEPTH: Ft, PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite _ Other CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete - Asphalt L x Other easement MANHOLE CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor L TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped _ Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft. Fr.1 Film Photo L M.H. REMARKS 1Ft. No. - 00 MH 6 83 Roots in joint 90 Wide joint OK 95 Broken bell grade OK 7 113 Roots in joint 8 — 0 125 Wide joint with roots 143 Wide joint with roots .r 188 MH 5 Grade and structure good except at; noted SOLIDIFICATION, INC, T ` INSPECTION REPORT c� •-e;-, • 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 17, 1977 PACE NOS 7 2 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee � PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same 1.� ON: right of way south of river FROM: MH 8 TO: MH 9 LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 373 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: Ft, PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt X Other - MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. 00 MH 8 55 Service R y 110-155 Low pipe 3-5" low 139 Camera under water 157 Service R debris at joint 163 Offset joint 204 Service R 9 273 Roots in joint 10 300 Service R 323 Offset joint 3/8-1/2" top 334 Low joint 373 MH 9 Grade marginal; structure good. TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 'C4, DATE• November 17. 1977 PAGE N0, 8 — N c� 620 Cottonwood Lane • Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: samei�,i 4 1 ON: right of way south of river — FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 377 Ft. (length) X SANITARY ♦ _ DEPTH: Ft, PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay __ PVC X Concrete — Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt — X Other MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft, No. 00 MH 9 123 Service R tap 242 Service R tap protruding running 11 — 277 Service R protruding running 287 Offset joint 1" top/bottom 12 295-315 Low pipe 1-3" 307 Low joint 3" low 377 MH 10 Grade marginal -- :structure good — • i — SOLIDIFICATION, INC, TV INSPECTION REPORT . .0" ��'; 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 14. 1977 PAGE NO. 9 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same ��•6,,� ON: right of way south of river FROM: TO: — LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) _116 Ft. ( length) X SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay _ PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt X Other — - MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft, Fr,1 Film Photo M,H, REMARKS iFt. No. 00 MH 10 06 Service L 91 Small roots in joint 106-116 2-3" low 116 MH 11 Grade and structure good • t SOLIDIFICATION, INC, TV INSPECTION REPORT `O'I b` ,C',O 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 14. 1977 PAGE NO. 10 — Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same ,•6 ON: right of way south of river _ (! FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) _ 270 Ft, (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: Ft, PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay _ PVC X Concrete — Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt X Other - MANHOLE CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft, No. 00 MH 12 47 Roots in joint 58 Roots in joint 91 Possibly protruding service L midway from joints 13 150 Badly offset joint upstream pipe about 1-2" drop 14 181 Offset joint 1/2-1" low ur. tream 262 Service 12:00 270 MH 11 Grade and structure marginal SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT y``O'� '`' 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 15, 1977 PAGE NO. 11 b Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee �. ' PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same !it\ �'. ON: right of way south of river FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 378 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt X Other easement '- MANHOLE CONDITION: Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical — X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. I REMARKS ,Ft. No. 00 MH 13 65-79 Low pipe 2-3" low 103 Offset joint 3/8-1/2" offset 105-116 2-3" low 178 Service entry L 258 Small roots in joint 303 Service entry 12:00 318 Roots in joint 15 330 Roots in joint 366 Light roots in joint 378MH12 Grade marginal structure good 1 • TV INSPECTION REPORZ SOLIDIFICATION, INC, November 15, 197712 o. O�� 'C4, 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: PAGE NO. — " % Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee �' PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: slime ,�;; ON: right of way south of river _ A FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia,) 133 Ft. (length) X SANITARY L DEPTH: Ft, PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC --1--- Concrete L. Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt L X Other easement - MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor L TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped - Other L CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS 1Ft. No. 00 MH 13 -L 31 Sm:ill roots 61 Offset joint 1/2" I 70-85 Low pipe 2-3" low 133 MH 14 L L Grade marginal -- structure good L L • L SOLIDIFICATION• , INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT °�� ��'�, 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 15. 1977 PAGE NO. 13 " Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of ShAopee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same ON: right of way south of river FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 241 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC � Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Goud Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt X Other easement MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft. Fr.� Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. 00 MH 14 25 Offset joint 37 Roots in joint 53-65 Low 2-3" low 1 85 Offset joint small roots 1 103 Roots in joint 130-140 Low pipe 1-2" 180-220 Low 3-4" 205 Offset joint 1/2" 241 MH 15 Grade marginal -- structure good Roots caught in camera - could not take pictures because of bright spot. MH 15 buried. • 1 TV INSPECTION REPOR1, SOLIDIFICATION, INC. November 15 1977 14 y. °�� �r'�o\ 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: PAGE N0. __Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee �' PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same ON: right of way ,south of river ,./.;: V. .. FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 254 Ft. (length) X SANITARY L. ______ DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old 17 Years J...TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other L CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete - Asphalt L X Other MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical L X Undeveloped _ Other l CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X L. p Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo L M.H. REMARKS pFt. No. 00 MH 15 was buried _I 07 Roots in joint L 30, Roots in joint 44I Roots in Joint '' . r L 56, Roots in joint 68 Heavy roots in joint 101 Service R k 126 Roots in joint 242 Offset joint 1/2" _ 254 MH 15A (new) _- Grade and structure good. .r Roots caught in camera - could not take pictures because of bright ::pot. —, — SOLIDIFICATION• , INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT 0' 620 �C'', 620 Cottonwood Lane ° DATE: November 15. 1977 PAGE NO. 15 1 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee �'— PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same ON: -fight of way south or river FROM: TO: LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 122 Ft. ( length) X SANITARY DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM AGE: New x Old 17 Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt Other pa-:ement MANHOLE CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical y Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft. Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS 4Ft. No. 00 MH 15A , 23 L.irde rocks in line 96-107 Low pipe 2-3" low 122 MH 16 • Grade and structure good Should have rocks removed I • REPORT INDEX Report Summary Location Page On Minnesota River, from MH 16 - 17 to MH 18 1-2 On Minnesota River, from MH 19 to MH 18 3 On Minnesota River, from MH 19 to MH 20 4 On Minnesota River, from MH 21 to MH 20 5 On Minnesota River, from MH 23 - 22 to MH 21 6-7 On Minnesota River, from MH 23 to MH 24 8 On Minnesota River, from MH 25 to MH 24 9 On Minnesota River, from MH 25 to MH 26 10 On Minnesota River, from MH 26 to MH 27 11-1? On Minnesota River, from MH 27 to MH 28 13-14 On Minnesota River, from MH 30 - 29 to MH 28 15-16 On Minnesota River, from MH 30 to MH 31 17 On Minnesota River, from MH 31 to MH 32 18 _ On Minnesota River, from MH 33 to MH 32 19 On Minnesota River, from MH 33 to MH 34 20 On Minnesota River, from MH 35 to MH 34 21 On Minnesota River, from MH 35 to MH 36 22 On Minnesota River, from MH 37 to MH 36 23 Picture pages: '— SOLIDIFICATION, INC, TV INSPECTION REPORT y. O' /c're 620 Cottonwood Lane = Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: May "•7 - Jurtf ? PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: 1977 PAGE NO. City ..� I�:ikooee AT ,,we ON: FROM: TO: Ft. Fr. Film Photo M,H. REMARKS Ft. No. :CPO'T FuteLARY Not much infiltration at pre'ent time, but in areas where pipe i-: low, joint • would be opened up on bottom and even changes in flow could cause a sewer charging action, and in time w<: : :,and from out:;ide and in, thu.; causing .i void around pipe, ciu .inQ them to ..ettle, and eventually crinnle your main line into ,eriou . problem:., A rough ynor .i:; ;;outinue: , but : ee report for .Iet: it MH 17 - 1F: ..hould be re-cleaned - 19: •.hould he re-cle=ined MH 19 :;nd 2 pipe rich direction should be raised MH 71 and nine 5(1' up, tre.m : hould be rai: ed Mh ' ' - MH 21: low pipe all the way & :;hould be raised • MH '? :end / pine down •tre-m hould be raised MH 71 - MII '4: cmewhat low, but liveable _ It :appear that fir -t 75' downstream of MH ?5 is very dirty with ,-o.ar:.e rock and gravel. If thi: were clean, MH 24-/5 would drain better and eve:-ything from MH /4 - MH ?6 would drm in better. Could be re-televi ped after cleaning and checked out, MH ?5 - MH 27 iF1 dirty, but also appear:. that high fill bank on ton of pipe c.+u:;ed grade problems from MH 26 - Sta. 80 to 230. Should be raised, CONTINUED SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT °1, , 620 Cottonwood Lane " °s Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: May 27 - t„na ? 1977 PAGE NO. PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: oiry nf . },,knp" *°41147 AT: ,„, FROM: TO: Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. RtTntm i m'ry ••rutinmPd .;H 27 - '8: b„Id i pie 171-'3l'' and 1:o 105-381 should be r u i ed MH 1E - /9! OK MH ?9 - 3(1: O_: MH 30 - 11: MH 31 - 3'• UL_ but ,e-1 leak It .'t:;_ 16 -- MH 33 - '.': OK - MH 3 - 34 : OK, but ,,e.t1 leek NH 35 - 14: low Hire„ hut liveable '5 - 15: OK, but . e:.1 lei;k in NH 35 .7 - 15: One b: d .not for g•rAde, but liveable _ SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT °`°o, ,c',0 • 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: H.;•, 17, 1477 PAGE NO. 1 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: °1: 1I r,ee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: .�� ON: Minne.ioti Fiver FROM: MN 16 - 17 TO: MIT 16 LINE: SIZE: 12 Inches (dia.) 218 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: 7-E Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: 7 Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other — - MANHOLE CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical Y _ Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. tw 11H 16 ff•-et right id.± 1/;'" 15 :Ito in slrAc /4 57 ':oot.• in joint l ':^ ' & ?:N' 1 •5 :oot : in joint 7 • 75 Joint low 1" or .its. 81 high 3 54-1C•8 1" low 111 ^.00tz, in joint - like Picture r? 171,-14r Low nice 1-1 z" or MU hih 135 Light roots in joint 140 M11 17 Or MU 17 nO-15 1-1 i" of and in pile 35 service in pipe nt 2:C( 4 4 . Heavy root.. tor. hrlf pipe low le 5 TV INSPECTION REPORZ SOLIDIFICATION, INC. ,o f os' 620 Cottonwood Lane " z Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: ti-!y ''7, 1 )77 PAGE NO. PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: �•_ ;;�, ,�,e AT. —. ON: Einne -otn 'iyer FROM: :11! 1 > - 17 TO: Alli 1;.' Ft, Fr, Film Photo L M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. 5 -'''-" w^te:- in nine r,l . Pc ;ible cervi: e t 1:On or hole in nine full of root : 6 - loci '35-3" 91 Heavy root entcrinQ, M1{ 7 9f; MH 18 35-91; l-?" of writer in line F. Mf{ 1F L cee following re ,ort for ob• tcu:.tion & renson low. • L j In g,enernl, thi'. section look; good except for roots . L . L L 1 SOLIDIFICATION, INC. T r INSPECTION REPORT Nom`°or 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: May 27_ 1977 PAGE NO. 3 = Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: ch.ikopee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same ON: Minnesota River • FROM: MH 19 TO: 'kill LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) __ 86 Ft. (length) SANITARY DEPTH: 7-8 , Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM AGE: New 1960 X Old Years TYPE: Clay _ PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other MANHOLE CONDITION: Good Dirty Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft, No. 00 MU 19 6" of water 00-15 Tapers from 6" of water to dry pipe at ::t:!. 15 8 44 Roots in joint E. 1-1)' of sand & gravel in pipe 9 66 2-2." of ;,and and gravel in pipe - hold.: water b:.cl: upr. trer.ai 10 77 3-3 " sand & gravel 82 Heavy root:: 10:0U & 2:0C 86 MH 18 Pipe grade and structure good, but ditty & needs cleaning to drain - see next report for statu> on 00-15. TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC. y`°�� �r', 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: May 27. 1977 PAGE NO. 4 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: chaknpe_e PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: .:am+_ ON: FROM: Minner.ot.' PivPr Mu 19 TO: mH it) LINE: SIZE: 1R Inches (dia.) __60 Ft. (length) SANITARY — DEPTH: R_lA Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM AGE: New 1960 X Old Years _ TYPE: Clay PVC Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt _ Other • MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Dirty Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo _ M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. 00 MH 19 water down .tre:gut 10-11" 02-1? Taper:, from lu-11" low to 3" low at 12 12-17 Tapers from 3" low to dry pi 'e nc ta. 17 _ 50 . Detergent and grea-.e on inner wall.; of pi7e 11 50 MH 20 Pipe looks good except dirty * MH 19 hat; settled 8-10" and al.:o 2 pine each direction have settled. { �� , SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT 'O c' c 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: M.,5, 27, 1977 PAGE NO• 5 = Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: _shakonee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: -.:;me • • 40' FROM:ON: Minae :^it.-i River TO rlli U LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 218 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: 8-18 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft, STORM AGE: New 1960 X Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other MANHOLE CONDITION: Good _ Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS 1Ft. No. • 00 MH 21 8-9" of water at MU 39 Light root:: in joint 00-50 Tanen: from ;,-9" of water it MH to dry ni ',e ir 5''• 78 Service L `f tin OK no flew 105-21' Low pipe up to .1" low at 15n & 165 125 1-1k" of water 135 1 ' low 140 2" low 150 21" low 165 214" low 170 C:ease & detergent on inner wall' 185 114-2" low 218 MH 20 Pipe ::tructuie OK, but low area - up to from 105-?] 5. Real bad grade from 00-5n, up to 9-10" low including MH. NH ..-.:t t„ bink. SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT `°if , 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: May 31. 1977 PAGE NO. o Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Shikopee - PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: saute ON: ON: Minne;ota River FROM: MH 2'+ - 22 TO: efli 21 • LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) _741 Ft. (length) X SANITARY — DEPTH: 10-17 Ft. PIPE LENGTH g Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old Years _ TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt _ Other MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Dirty Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS MH 21 plugged 'Ft. No. 00 MH 23 25 2-21i" low 00-45 Low' 22 1-l'f" low 32-75 1-l " low 75-90 Low ?-^'!" 90 Low ?-2r 12 90-111 r,H at 110 4-5" low 103 5-6" low 13 111 MH 22 5-G" low MH al•:o low 00 MH 22 5-6" low 07 Light root:. in joint 5-s" low 14 .- if Light root:, in joint Like Picture 1'14 25 Light roots in joint 15 l SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT 0 620 Cottonwood Lane O " Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: May 31, 1977 PAGE NO. 7 _ 444g, PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: ch _kn e��AT: ame ON: Minne .ct- Pivor FROM: mi 21 _ 20 TO: NH 21 Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft, No. 00-30 5-6" low 30-40 7-8" low 43 Service L tap 6 or 8" OK 49 8-9" low 16 53 9-10" low 50 Camera under water in 10" of water in 18" pipe 50-95 Camera under water 10" or more low 95-115 Picture, but 9" low 115-130 Low pipe 7-8" 130 MH 21 low 7-8." Thi e tion, MH22-21 ap'.+etil . to hive .ettl:d from 5-10" or more li..ted, h a . o :.ettled, -3 _ li ted Fine ! tructure in both . ection.. i goo.i, SOLIDIFICATION, INC. DATE: 1'INSPECTION REPORT c` . 620 Cottonwood Lane y 1, 1977 PAGE N0. 8 )" ic " = Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: ShAko',ee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: :.brae � ON: Minnerota River — �' FROM: al '3 TO: l'JL 24 LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 38Ft. (length) SANITARY DEPTH: 1?-14 Ft. PIPE LENGTH � Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt — Other - MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good _ Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo _ M.H. REMARKS MH 21 plugged Ft. No. CC MR 23 25-41 3/4" dip in gr.ide OK 60-76 3/4" di: in gr :de OK _ 120-138 3/4" din iu gr•ide C:: 144-175 Low gr:,de 1-1 ' 175-'40 Low grade 1A-2' 240-280 Low grade 2-21/2" 249 Low 2-211" 17 280-100 Low 21/2-3" 300-34C' 3-3.1/29 low — 340-380 'i-4" low 38+0 MH 24 3 -4" water •:t:undine in MR Pipe -,t:u`ture very good. _ Pipe quite clean. SOLIDIFICATION, INC. T V INSPECTION REPO R T °�°1620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: May 11, 1977 PAGE NO. 9 = Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Shikopea PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: :;:ime ON: Minne':ot River FROM: MH 25 TO: Nit 4 LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 379 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: 6-9 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 6 Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay _ PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other Park • MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good dirty Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical Undeveloped Other Park CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS MH 21 plugged Ft. No. • 00 MH 25 00-150 High water ;t- nding in pipe 9-10" 188 High water t 'nding in pipe with flow up• tre::m plugged off 8-9" 18 19b-225 6-8" w:'t.2r all the 125-?7C 5-5" water c nding in pipe 270-315 4-5" water :-t.inding in pi"e 315-379 33-4" water :.tanding in pipe 355 Typical 18" pipe 4" water in pipe 19 379 MH 24 Grade in this section i. uniform, but either the entire line is settled or heavy flow from 15" pipe entering MH?5 from the :south block!. it & holds water t::.ble high in pipe half way b rk to NH 21. s TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC, N..`co' 'c',s 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: May 31, 1977 PAGE NO. lf) Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Slv.kopee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: - me Vil ON: Minne:.ot..� River — FROM: MN '5 TO: .) LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) 39& Ft. (length) X SANITARY •— DEPTH: 6-7 Ft, PIPE LENGTH � Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old Years _ TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other Par MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS �Ft. No. Ot MH 25 07-CS 01" pi;,e low 11" leaving MH and :it f.ti. 9 we h. ve full picture bac►c - about t• ' low 35-11( 5-7" flow 110-155 5-6" flow 155-300 5-51" flow 300-35(1 5-6" flow 360-390 4-5" flow 190 MH 26 - Thi . section very uniform for grade, but flow in pipe quite deep. ;'tructure very good. Pipe i . cle n, It appe i .. that from c:mp ra action while -- rull.inw that the fi_. t 75 or 1C(' ft, could be very dirty wLih ::oar::e material:. under flow, cau:.ing • t:able in ripe in thi : entire -!ren, SOLIDIFICATION, INC, TV INSPECTION REPORT c`°,� ,c').c 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: N-ly '1, 1977 PAGE N0, 11 " s Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: h d of e 1741117 /` PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: - Aei� ON: Minn �t i River. Awi FROM: MH 7i TO: epi 7 LINE: SIZE: ,71 Inches (dia.) _2,78 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: 8-9 Ft. PIPE LENGTH S Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: Good X Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt X Other Park MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft. Fr. Film Photo M.H. REMARKS 4Ft. No. CO MH 76 NH plugged & is:.in • em•,ty 55-86 Start of dirty pine 80-107 T;-pzr:, from dry pine to li -11" lou 107-11 ' 10-11" los; 113-182 C .L:C:-1 under water it le.: t 11" low 187 Picture back 9-10" low 152-'2.30 Taper: bzz.::.k to 2" of water 230-960 of water, taper, to dry pine a:t 26u 260-276 Dry pipe to 4" low at 27. 276 Dirty & low pipe down 1-4" 20 — 276-340 L w & dirty 4" 368 Debri:; in pipe low 4" 21 343 Joint not home & pipe di_ty 22 Low t.iper.- irons low to dry pi')e at 378 MH 27 TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC, ".0 620 Cottonwood Lane _ Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: May "11. 1977 PAGE NO, 1:i PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: *AV AT •.:1mP ON: MinnP ^r PivP FROM: M1j 16 TO: tIH -7 Ft, Fr, Film Photo 1 — , M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. ! p4 •r'nr1`Y 11<7d ;,'r Rl`_"(' rnmr 1 '" Ft,—1 -01r..r 4" — Need.. rLe^niig SOLIDIFICATION, INC, T V INSPECTION REPORT o' 4;\ ��''a 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: Jiro. ', 1')77 PAGE NO• 1 ' = Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Sh :kopec• IVAIM PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: ON: Minne:;ot i River NN FROM: MH "7 TO: t.:{ 28 LINE: SIZE: Inches (dia.) m1 Ft. (length) DEPTH: 7_11 Ft, PIPE LENGTH g Ft. x STORM AGE: New x Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: Good X Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other MANHOLE CONDITION: ;; Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical x Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS MH 27 r,lueged 4Ft. No. 00 Mir 27 MH dry & dr- ini.nr 60-92 Lou pipe 3/4-1" of water 115-170 Low 1-11:" 144 �e.rviee R .i cr 8" Oh: 155 Typical 2" ioint low 1-1k" & lirty ?3 170-187 Low 11/2" & taper.: to 7-e" low :t 187 187 7 8" low po. : ibly dirty ripe under the w:Irer dA)ri• & n-e. •e 24 on top '06 Low pipe 7-8" :'t 187 & taper..- to lu" lc.w . Dirty on ton, 25 Thi. pipe cun: full during normal flow 212 Loot: in ioint & 8-9" water taner- from 11" lova it 2nr. hark to 26 8" low at 21Y T:;per:: from 8-9" low at _l. b .ek tc 1" of w-:ter it :;c.1, 230 230-._7t. 1" of wi cc-r 277 Root.; in joint & '-:." of water SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT `°,r 'C'�, 620 Cottonwood Lane Oy O " z Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: June 7, 1977 PAGE NO. 14 -;,;-- PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: 711 ,.{;note AT: we ON: N.inne ot:: River FROM: MH :'7 TO: rut " 8 Ft. Fr. Film Photo 1-- M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. 1 270-3C,5 2-3" low 305 ?-3" low & t.oer - to 6" low at 355 321 ervice R 6 or 8' ni^•e OK low S-6" 27 355-381 Continued 4-5" low to MH 3E1 MH 28 4" of water in MH Pipe appe. r - quite :•le 'n •-ome rare . .e on inner Bad grade noted in re^ort SOLIDIFICATION, INC, TV INSPECTION REPORT °'%OoI •620 Cottonwood Lane DATE1977 Jun: •>- 9 • PAGE NO. 15 " Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: .,me .6 ON: 1-1inn�> of ' 4:iver Npp FROM: MH 30 - 29 TO: MU LINE: SIZE: -1 Inches (dia.) _17b Ft. (length) SANITARY DEPTH: irt_jq Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC Cast Iron — x Concrete Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other - MANHOLE CONDITION: Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream Downstream M.H, Film Photo REMARKS pr? ^7' •-•1c -e1 Ft. Nc. G: Iut 30 00-30 3/4-1" of w.ter 30-50 1-1;" of w::ter :.tanding "* 59 Calcium build-up .,t 1.0 . E, f-•-t drip l:-1'• low 28 50-62; 1•Z-2" low :.t :'sta. 60 & t.•ner:. to dry nine :It 'i8 j,:.int :,t 68 1" high 68-10u Low 111-2" of water low point 't. • 05 - 1" 110-130 Low 1" 130-150 0i' liib MH "9 Pipe c-.tructure good. 1-2" of water in bottom of pie on enri e line Very good 00 Ilii 29 debris in MH huldinb water -2J high up- tre:im to Sta. WO 65 . Servicedat r 'rd & nrotr:,di 4 pipe low l -2" $ 29 — f TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 00 620 Cottonwood Lane y z Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: June 3, 1977 PAGE NO. 1' PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: 1�_ kooee AT: Minn ON: llinneot. <iver FROM: Mi 30 - ?9 TO: `iti Ft. Fr. Film Photo L M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. 1C,0-150 Loco lk-?" L 156 Light root:. in joint & loci ?k" 30 150-li0 Low ,-?" L 16n-186 Low 1-4" 186-189 Low 11/2-4" 190 gni 28 Gr::de on thi section bounce, rround from 1-4" low noted but no harp breAk : in grade and cuite uniform. Pioe tructu e very good, .'cnewh t bre., y on inner w :11 . SOLIDIFICATION, INC. T V INSPECTION REPORT w,s°ir 'r'' • o 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 2, 1977 PAGE NO. 17 = Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Shakopee ..'' PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same ON: :in innesota River FROM: MH 30 TO: MH 31 LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) 361 Ft. (length) X DEPTH: — SANITARY 18-11 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other - MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION_ --_` Upstream X Downstream Ft, Fr, Film Photo M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. 00 MH 30 MH 30 plugged MH 30 dry at start 05-55 Low.pipe tapers to 3 " deep at 38 and back to dry pipe at 55 * 117 Service at 1:00 flowing 31 * 166 Service at 12:00 - many fast streams of water flowing out 32 166 Soap suds and flow out of service 33 217 Service at 1:00 OK 291 Service it 1:00 OK 293 Service at 12:00 tapped & heavy flow Looks like Picture #32 & 33 305 Low pipe or dip in grade 340 Service at 2:00 tapped OK 361 MH 31 Debris in MH hold!. water back to 305 about 1'-3" deep Pipe clean and grade very good - structure very good o�� �� SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT_ '►, 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 2. 1977 PAGE NO. 18 = Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Shrknpez ag PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: ti ame 41*: ON: Minnesota River FROM: MH 31 TO: MH 32 LINE: SIZE: ,)1 Inches (dia.) _ 355 Ft. (length) X SANITARY -- DEPTH: 11_8 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft, STORM AGE: New X Old Years _ TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt _ Other Brush MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream IiiiimmmmakairenewT Ft. Fr, Film Photo — M.H. REMARKS 1Ft. No. 00 MH 31 MH 30 plugged * 18 Heavy leak in joint 3:00 1-115 gal, per min. 34 34 Calcium build-up on joint has leaked not now _ 51 Calcium build-up has leaked 171 Debris or cement in bottom of pipe holds 1-11" of water in pipe back to Sta. 1UU 206 Service at 12:00 tapped OK dry 355 MH 32 Pipe clean line, grade, structure - very good -' Leak at Sta. 18 should be sealed • SOLIDIFICATION, INC. T V INSPECTION REPORT ,01, 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 2_ 1977 PAGE NO. 19 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Makooee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: sae f•�����"__ ON: Minnesota River FROM: MH 33 TO: MH 32 LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) _ 370 Ft. (length) X SANITARY DEPTH: 8_9 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair — --- Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other Woods MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical X Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft, Fr. M,H, Film Photo REMARKS 1Ft. No. 00 MH 33 MH 30 plugged 00-20 Low pipe 13/4" 52 Service at 12:00 flowing OK 158 Service L 11:0CC dry OK 248 Service L tapped dry OK 37C MH 32 This section very good for line, grade, structure • • a__ TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC. _ Nyopt ic'>= 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 2. 1977 PAGE NO. 20 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: nakopee PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: ::ame ON: FROM: Minnesota River MH 33 TO: MH 34 LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) 296 Ft. (length) X SANITARY • — DEPTH: 9-7 Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old Years _ TYPE: Clay _ PVC y Coucrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: x Gravel Concrete Asphalt _ Other woods MANHOLE CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical x Undeveloped Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream Ft, Fr, Film Photo M,H, REMARKS 1Ft, No. O(. MH 33 MH 30 plugged 06 Fast drip in Joint at 12:0C 02-48 Low pipe out of MH 1-14" _ 296 MH 34 This section very good for line, grade, and structure No problems I _ • oyo�, SOLIDIFICATION, INC. % TV INSPECTION REPORT 0 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 1. 1977 PAGE NO 21 = Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: `lhakopee � PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: ,:•me 5411° ON: Minne,ot�i River FROM: MH 15 TO: _ MH 34 LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) 113 Ft. (length) DEPTH: SANITARY 7_8 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron i Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt Other wood:; MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential X Undeveloped Other • Commerical CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft. Fr, M,H, REMARKSFilm Photo MH 34 plugged ,Ft. No. 00 MH 35 * 02 Leak at 5:30 position in MH at end of 21" pipe 1/2 gal, per min, ' 34 Typical 21" pipe -.how:; normal flow line & low pipe 2-211" 35 _ 43 2J-3" low 51 Tapers to 4-5" low 58 Tapers to 5-6" low Note how much higher normal flow marks 36 are now 58-95 Tapers back to about 11/2" low manhole ahead 95 1-11" low 37 113 MH 34 Bad grade en this line: 58' is the low point and this i • rect y un er a - cu vert t at •ra ns: a po o - • c .�:, this birm - on top of sewer - lowest area 30-95 Pipe in clean and structure i:; good. Leak in MH 35 should be sealed. SOLZDIFICATIUN, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT `° c', • 10 by �I i i — 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 1977 • PAGE NO. ?2 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: clok,p0n PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: •-ime. ON: — .iii Minna�nt,i YiuPr p FROM: MH '3% TO: 36 LINE: SIZE: :24Inches (dia.) _30/ Ft. (length) g SANITARY — DEPTH: 7 A Ft. PIPE LENGTH A Ft. STORM AGE: New x Old Years _ TYPE: Clay _ PVC . Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite _ Other -- CONDITION: --X---CONDITION: _X__..- Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: Gravel _ Concrete Asphalt - — Other wood MANHOLE CONDITION: _ Good Fair Poor — TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical — Undeveloped - Other CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream Downstream •Ft. Fr. Film Photo _ M.H. REMARKS MB 'IL ?1„agari Ft. No. ( O{L MN 15 MN bot*om clo,-e to A,-it 4 - — sO-66i 3/4-1" of wtor 76 Cglriitm hitCIA-ITQ on joint _ 38 — 16f-7n4 Taperer to 1#" dppp nt ]RA, . hnrk to 't/4" a 2 15 1R6„ Low pnint 1-1ii" of water 205 Tanen; from 114" deer to '-2k" deal:. at StL 235 & continues 2-21" deep to Sta. 260 — , 260 Taners from 2-215" dee at 260 back to about 114" at Sta 275 — 275 MH OK 302 MH 36 — Pipe .tructure irz Qood Grade varies 2-2)4" but uniform Pipe is clean • I - i SOLIDIFICATION, INC, TV INSPECTION REPORT .:-. 5.;77F:0;7F''� 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 3, 1977 PACE NO, 73 y Z Minneapolis , MN 55441 FOR: ShnknoPe . iiiir..&,: PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: %;:Me y ON: Mtrine_;Qta B iv_er FROM: MH 37 TO: MN 35 LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) 292 Ft. ( length) X SANITARY DEPTH: 20-8 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM AGE: New X Old Years TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete Cast Iron Ductile Truss Transite Other CONDITION: Good Fair Poor ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt Other wood: - MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential X Undeveloped Other Commerical CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream Ft. Fr. M,H, Film Photo REMARKS MH 34 plugged 'Ft No. 00 MH 37 at sewer plant 2-3" of water standing in this pipe because of heavy flow entering MH 37 from the east, ?-3" at J manhole and tapers off to a dry pipe at Sta. 175 00-175 Grade uniform 209 Normal flow mark half pipe pipe greasy on i1rgide joint corroded typical —'� 209-217Tapers to 4" low at 217 217-225 � Taper:; from 4" low beck to normal 292 MH 36 This section looks very _good for line and structure Sharp grade dip at 209-225 Pipe is greasy ' , APPENDIX A3 TV INSPECTION LOGS OF RIVER TRUNK SEWER, 1992 46„ '`,,z SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 7233 Winnetka Avenue North / Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 / (612) 535-1065 April 15, 1992 Mr. Dave Simons -- Short Elliot Hendrickson 3535 Vadnais Center Drive St. Paul, Minnesota 55110 SUBJECT: TELEVISION INSPECTION REPORT WORK ORDER #5218 Dear Mr. Simons, Enclosed are the field findings of our television inspection report. Should you have any questions regarding this inspection please, feel free to contact our office. Also enclosed is a copy of our invoice, the original invoice has been sent to the accounts payable department. We look forward to serving your future needs. Thank You, Robert Ratz Sales Manager RR/kb enclosures ` Specialists In Underpinning and Ground Water Control CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION INSPECTION REPORT FOR SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON IN SHAKOPEE,, MINNESOTA WORK ORDER NUMBER 5213 Shakopee, Minnesota April 8, 1992 Solidification, Inc. 7233 Winnetka Avenue Nort Minneapolis, Minnesota 5542 (612) 535-1065 y\OO f /Cqr'` I', °y „ SOLIDIFICATION, INC. CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION PROCEDURE The television inspection is conducted by pulling a water proof television camera, at a uniform rate, through the sewer line. The line condition, as viewed by the television camera, is transmitted to a television screen (monitor) . The television technician observes and records the following pertinent data: • Broken, cracked or missing pipe . Alignment, line and grade . Defective joints • • Infiltration or inflow . Root intrusions . Service connections (and locations) • Protruding taps • Other pertinent factors that would affect proper functioning of the line. RECORDS Written records are kept of pertinent data. In addition, polaroid pictures (from the television screen) are taken of defects, etc. , and included in the report. The report locates all taps and services, indicating the distance from the manhole. The service is further identified as entering from the right or left, using the clock face as a means of identification. Depending upon the analysis, pertinent recommendations are included. Oy O\f fC O Iy Z � DEFINITIONS Broken A section of line or service loose or missing from the pipe. Camera Under Water Indicates a flowing or standing liquid in excess of one-half pipe. Circular crack A crack around the circumference of the pipe. Clock A position relating to the numerals on the face of a clock. Collapsing Indicates that a section of pipe is broken and in danger of falling in. Combined sewer A sewer intended to serve as a sani- tary and a storm sewer. Dead End The beginning of a section of line on the upstream side. Downstream exfiltration The leakage or flow of discharge being carried by sewers out into the ground through leaks in pipes, joints, manholes, or other sewer •— system structures ( the reverse of infiltration) . Drip A slow intermittent flow of extran- eous water entering the pipe through a joint, service, or structural deficiency. Fractured pipe A pattern of irregular cracks in the pipe. Hairline crack A minor crack, not necessarily a structural failure. Infiltration Water entering a sewer system and service connections from the ground, through means such as, but not limited to, defective pipes, pipe joints, connections, or manhole walls. Infiltration does not include _ and is distinguished from inflow. Jho O\ sS - 1,1,,. Inflow Water discharged into a sewer system and sewer connections from such sources as, but not limited to, roof leaders, cellar, yard and area drains, foundation drains, cooling water discharges, drains from springs and swampy areas, man- hole covers, cross connections from storm sewers and combined sewers, catch basins, storm waters, surface run-off, street wash waters, or drainage. Inflow does not include and is distinguished from infil- - tration. Infiltration/Inflow The total quantity of water from both infiltration and inflow with- out distinguishing the source. Inside drop A sewer line which enters the man- hole wall at an elevation above the invert and discharges (drops) wastewater directly into the man- - hole some variable distance above the manhole bottom. Leak A measureable, steady flow of extraneous water entering the pipe through a joint, service or other pipe structural deficiency. Longitudinal crack A crack parallel to the direction of flow. Manhole (Standard) An opening in a sewer provided for the purpose of permitting access to the sewer system for inspections and manitenance. Misalignment Departure from true grade line of pipe. Offset joint Indicates a misalignment of the joint. Open crack or open joint Any crack or joint where separa- tion is evident. �O�f �O h Outside drop A sewer line that comes to a manhole at an elevation higher than the invert; a vertical riser is connected to the line and is brought into the manhole at the invert with a 90° elbow. Piece missing A piece broken out of the wall of the pipe. Radial crack A circular crack of less than 360°. Sanitary sewer A sewer intended to carry only sanitary and industrial waste- waters from residences, commercial buildings, industrial plants, and institutions. Service A manufactured wye or tap con- nected to the main line. Service leaking Infiltration into the sewer around a service connection. Service running A measureable, steady flow of ex- traneous water entering the pipe from the service connection. Spiral crack A crack progressing longitudinally in a corkscrew pattern. Storm sewer A sewer intended to carry only stormwater, surface run-off, street wash waters, and drainage. Tap protruding A service that protrudes into the main sewer line. Upstream The higher end of a gravity flow sewer line. k .:F SOLIDIF »y'°'' '`'r-= ICATION, INC. 1444a zr 7233 Winnetka Avenue North / Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 / (612) 535-1065 ROOT GROWTH RATING SYSTEM FOR ROOTS IN MUNICIPAL SEWER SYSTEMS - e / t�._ t 1 2 3 i . es . i : Ili r„. _ . .I . - - I. l .;r+ � . h' t 4 5 6 : :. •"._,",P,, -r frilliglifillig: T ,,itA .. , -.:__. i A, .fil, , 4: ' , • .:. 7 8 9 0 to 9 System for rating root growth. A rating of 1 indicates 10% of pipe capacity occupied by root growth. Ratings con- - tinue through this numerical scale to 9, which indicates 907. occupancy by roots. No rating of 10 was used, as this would be 1007. occupancy and a complete root stoppage. Specialists In Underpinning and Ground Water Control TV INSPECTION REPORT - :,p '�+r,Z SOLIDIFICATION, INC. DATE: 3-23-92 PAGE NO. 1 —,7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOHendrickson, Inc. R: Short Elliott MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota _ (612) 535 1 0s5 ON: Easement along Minnesota River wil" � FROM: MH #2 TO: MH #3 — R.Q. #5213 LINE: DIAMETER: 15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: _ PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 395 Ft. GRAVEL — EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE DUCTILE x MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD x TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #2 at West end of the project where line goes under Highway 169 00 38 Roots in joint #8 1 50 Roots in joint #8 — 56 Roots in joint #9 - tryed to pull to next manhole to clean camera, got stuck at 114' , backed out and — put camera in at next manhole, backed to 247 ' got — stuck again, continued downstream 261 Roots in joint #6 2 315 Roots in joint #3 369 Roots in joint #5 — 387 Roots in joint #1 395 Manhole #3 360 TV INSPECTION REPORT y,%o" ,Z SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 3_23_92 2 DATE: PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 41107 ON: Easement along Minnesota River FROM: MH #3 TO: MH #4 LINE: DIAMETER: 15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 8 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 372 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: -- PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD x TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS _ INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #3 360 24 Roots in joint #3 96 Roots in joint #8 3 148 Roots in joint #9 162 Roots in joint #5 305 Roots in joint #1 372 Manhole #4 777 TV INSPECTION REPORT y�� +, SOLIDIFICATION, INC. DATE: 3-23-92 PAGE NO. 3 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota40 — i& (612) 535-1065 ON: Easement along Minnesota River FROM: MH #4 TO: MH #5 LINE: DIAMETER: _15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: — PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X DEPTH: 13 _ Ft. CONCRETE _ UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 379 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR - - TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE X ._ DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD X TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #4 777 204 Roots in joint #1 291 Service Right tap ok 299 Roots in joint #5 — 379 Manhole #5 1118 • TV INSPECTION REPORT •, SOLIDIFICATION, INC. ° ° DATE: 4-1-92 PAGE NO. 4 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 Shakopee, — vo (612) 535-1065AT: Minnesota ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #8 TO: MH #7 LINE: DIAMETER: 15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM DEPTH: 12 _ Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM X LINE LENGTH: 96 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X _ UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD x OTHER: FAIR TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE X DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #8 at end of Clay Street Televising with Rahr Company - flow off 1116 96 Manhole #7 1238 TV INSPECTION REPORT - °�°'` '��•o SOLIDIFICATION, INC. DATE: 4-1-92 PAGE NO. 5 21 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. 11:1 MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: _Shakopee, Minnesota _ i�®�t���� (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #7 TO: '�'l�, '` MH #6 LINE: DIAMETER: 15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: — PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM DEPTH: 13 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM X LINE LENGTH: 115 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD X OTHER: FAIR TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE X — DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE _ COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS -- NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #7 1238 — 115 Manhole #6 1336 TV INSPECTION REPORT ° '��•o SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-1-92 6 ' PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. , MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535.1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #6 TO: MH #5 LINE: DIAMETER: 15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM DEPTH: 13 Ft. CONCRETE _ UPSTREAM x LINE LENGTH: 189 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD x OTHER: FAIR TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: — PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #6 1336 189 Manhole #5 - behind Dairy Queen 1520 TV INSPECTION REPORT - yrs �. SOLIDIFICATION, INC. DATE: 4-1-92 PAGE NO. 6 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota — 4464 (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #8 TO: MH #9 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: _ PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 12 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 375 Ft. GRAVEL — EASEMENT _ x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x -- DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS _ INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #8 at Clay Street - 15" line plugged 1520 — at manhole #8 02-100 Very dirty 2 - 3 inches of debris on the bottom 159 Service Right tap - protruding 4 inches 4 — 208 Service Right tap ok 302 Service Right tap ok 375 Manhole #9 at end of Pierce Street 1816 Entire line is dirty TV INSPECTION REPORT ..°)" 'c4•, SOUDIFICATION, INC. ° DATE: 4-1-92 PAGE NO. 7 y Z 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 (612) 535-1065 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota � �►' ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #9 TO: MH #10 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT _ DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 12 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 379 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM _ CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR _ OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #9 at end of Pierce Street 1816 02-110 Dirty 1 - 2 inches of debris on bottom 126 Service Right tap ok 245 Service Right tap - protruding 3 - 4 inches 5 275 Service Right tap - protruding 4 inches 6 379 Manhole #10 2075 Line is quite dirty through out TV INSPECTION REPORT - SOLIDIFICATION INC. 4-1-92 8 0 Z ' DATE: PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota �� � (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #10 TO: MH #11 — LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 10 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 116 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD x OTHER: FAIR — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x _. DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE _ COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW __ SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #10 2075 -- 05 Service 12:00 tap ok 116 Manhole #11 2158 TV INSPECTION REPORT y,,0 1C4•Z SOUDIFlCATION, INC. 4-1-92 9 DATE: PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. �^ MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 � � AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535.1065 r: ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #11 TO: MH #12 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 271 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON _ POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x— VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING mss_ OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #11 - line is plugged 2158 06 Service 12:00 tap ok 88 Roots in joint #2 120 Offset joint 12 inches offset 7 179 Service Right tap ok 271 Manhole #12 2370 TV INSPECTION REPORT - • ,)'. -'4, SOLIDIFICATION INC. 4-1-92 10 0 i ' DATE: PAGE NO. — 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. *140' MINNEAPOLIS.065 MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota ON: _ — ( Minnesota River - Easement 481114. FROM: MH #12 TO: MH #13 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 _ In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: — PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 380 Ft. GRAVEL — EASEMENT _ X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x — DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING OTHER: TYPE: VHS _. NEW — SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #12 2370 75 Service 12:00 tap ok 107 Roots in joint #3 121 Roots in joint #1 — 211 Roots in joint #1 306 Roots in joint #2 327 Service 12:00 tap ok 331 Roots in joint #4 360 Roots in joint #5 ,r, 372 Roots in joint #2 380 Manhole #13 2600 — TV INSPECTION REPORT (:) SOUDIFICATION, INC. DATE: 4-1-92 PAGE NO. 11 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 WO" ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #13 TO: MH #14 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 135 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON _ POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD x TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #13 - where Scott Street would come out 2600 46 Looks like roots around a tap -_ not a joint 67 Roots in joint #4 • 102 Roots in joint #3 135 Manhole #14 2706 TV INSPECTION REPORT - %°'V 6. SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-2-92 12 0- • DATE: PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson,. Inc.— 11:1MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota � � (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement /AJ FROM: MH #14 TO: MH #15 — LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: — PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT X DOWNSTREAM X DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 243 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR X — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE X DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR X TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: _ EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #14 - line is plugged here 2706 — 37q Roots in joint #1 48 Large rock in line (4-5 inches) 158 Roots in joint #1 — 165 Roots in joint #2 180-207 Low pipe 3 - 32 inches low — 207 Offset joint 12 inches offset 230 Roots in joint #2 243 Manhole #15 - where Atwood Street would be 2848 TV INSPECTION REPORT c;. '`�• SOLIDIFICATION, INC. yy o DATE: 4-2-92 PAGE NO. 13 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MIN(NEAPOLIS, 612) 535-1065 MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #15 TO: MH #16 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x — DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 380 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x — SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS • INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: - TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #15 where Atwood Street would be - large 2848 roots in manhole - growing down the pipe a couple feet 06 Roots in joint #2 18 Roots in joint #1 30 Roots in joint #4 42 Roots in joint #1 54 Roots in joint #2 66 Roots in joint #5 _ 116-126 Low pipe 12 - 2 inches low 101 Service Right ok 126 Roots in joint #1 150 Roots in joint #3 156 Roots in joint #1 162 Roots in joint #2 — 168 Roots in joint #1 TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION INC y� fo ' DATE: 4-2-92 PAGE NO. 13A 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.. FOR: inorttp., MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #15 TO: MH #16 Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 198 Roots in joint #4 255 Manhole - new manhole added for service 355 Large rock in pipe (4-5 inch) 380 Manhole #16 - where Fuller Street would come out 3094 L L 1 L 1 L l 1 TV INSPECTION REPORT SOLIDIFICATION, INC. o DATE: 4-2-92 PAGE NO 14 y Z 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH Short Elliott Hendrickson, inc. �� FOR: MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 Shakopee, � � (612) 535-1065 AT: Minnesota t". ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #16TO: MH #17 __ LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 140 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR _ OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #16 - where Fuller Street would be 3094 67 Roots in joint #1 109 Roots in joint #2 140 Manhole #17 3184 TV INSPECTION REPORT ,, , SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-2-92 PAGE NO. 15 DATE: 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.— MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota _ (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #20 TO: MH #19 — • LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: — PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM DEPTH: 18 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM X LINE LENGTH: 60 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR X CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE _ COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #20 under 169 bridge on west side 3184 43-60 Low pipe up to 10 inches llow 52 Looks like and offset joint 8 60 Manhole #19 3251 TV INSPECTION REPORT • .. 'c4 SOLIDIFICATION, INC. o DATE: 4-2-92 PAGE NO. 16 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota ��� (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #19 TO: MH #18 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM DEPTH: 6 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM x LINE LENGTH: 82 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x -- SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR x OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo -- MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #19 - manhole is low 9 - 10 inches 3251 02-12 Low pipe up to 6 inches low 82 Manhole #18 3301 Looks like 2 - 3 inches of debris on bottom of pipe TV INSPECTION REPORT - 'C4 SOLIDIFICATION INC. 0 o DATE: 4-2-92 PAGE NO. 17 — Z 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. IV * MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428AT: Shakopee, Minnesota 4ii& (612) 535-1065 Minnesota River - Easement J ON: FROM: MH #18 TO: MH #17 — LINE: DIAMETER: 8 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: — PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT _ DOWNSTREAM DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM x LINE LENGTH: 98 Ft. GRAVEL — EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR X — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE X — DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE _ COMMERCIAL FAIR _ X TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS — NEW SPEED: EP — Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. — 00 Manhole #18 3301 06 Roots in joint #5 15 Large chunk of roots on top of the pipe - does no appear to be at a joint - may be a tap here — 62 Service Left tap ok 98 Manhole #17 3362 — Line is quite dirty through out TV INSPECTION REPORT 'C4 SOLIDIFICATION, INC. y- o DATE: 4-6-92 PAGE NO. 18 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTHFOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. 11:13' MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #20 TO: MH #21 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 21 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 218 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR _ TYPE: CAST IRON POOR x CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: -- PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD x TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #20 - this manhole is plugged 3362 02-80 Low pipe 2 - 3 inches standing water 140 Service Right tap ok 166-194 Low pipe up to 11 inches — 194-218 Camera under water 218 Manhole #21 - stands with 2 - 3 inches of solids manhole is very low 3445 TV INSPECTION REPORT ,, - y0" 'c4.o SOLIDIFICATION INC. DATE: 4-6-92 _ PAGE NO. 19 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. *41 MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (6121 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #21 TO: MH #22 • LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: — PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 12 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 130 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR x CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR x — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS — NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #21 - manhole is low with debris standing in — manhole 3445 02-108 Camera is under water 108-130 Low pipe 8 inches low _ 130 Manhole #22 3512 TV INSPECTION REPORT. SOUDIFICATION, INC. 20 4-6-92 0 i DATE: PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 _ *a*, AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #22 TO: MH #23 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 10 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 110 Ft. GRAVEL _ EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR TYPE: CAST IRON POOR x CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC _ TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR x OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: FP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #22 - manhole is low 8 - 9 inches low 3512 02-30 Low pipe 9 - 10 inches low 30-98 Low pipe 4 - 6 inches low 110 Manhole #23 3570 TV INSPECTION REPORT - , SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-6-92 21 y i DATE: PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 Shakopee, Minnesota(6121 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #23 TO: MH #24 — LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: — PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 14 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 378 Ft. GRAVEL _ EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x -' TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW _ SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #23 at end of Lewis Street - manhole plugged 357C — 05-200 Low pipe 2 - 3 inches of standing water 200-378 Low pipe 4 - 5 inches of standing water 378 Manhole #24 at the end of Summerville Street 3720 — TV INSPECTION REPORT �•, SOLIDIFICATION, INC. ° (:) DATE: 4-6-92 PAGE NO. 22 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #24 TO: MH #25 LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X DEPTH: 9 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 379 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR X TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE X DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS _ INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED __X __ VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #24 at end of Summerville Street 3720 02-120 _ Low pipe 4 - 5 inches standing water 120-310 Low pipe 6 - 10 inches low 310-366 Camera under water 379 Manhole #25 at the end of Spencer Street 3879 Some of the water could be held up from the 15" line coming in from the South. TV INSPECTION REPORT 1c4. SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-6-92 23 0 i DATE: PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535 1065 ON: Minnesota River — Easement FROM: mm #95 TO: MH #26 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 388 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION _ GOOD OTHER: FAIR X "' TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE _ COMMERCIAL FAIR X TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL x UNDEVELOPED — VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From I Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #25 at the end of Spencer Street - this 3879 manhole leaks heavy when river is up 02-100 Dirty - rocks & debris 81 Joint leaking 2:00 _ 388 Manhole #26 at end of Fillmore Street 4065 Flow coming in manhole #25 from the 15" line to the south is only 2 - 3 inch in the 15" pipe TV INSPECTION REPORT ‘olf �• SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-6-92 24 DATE: PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. tV, MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota — � (612) 535-1065 �► ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #26 TO: MH #27 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 8 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 372 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR TYPE: CAST IRON POOR x CLAY CONCRETE �— DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: RP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #26 at end of Fillmore Street 4065 70-200 Low pipe camera under water 203 Joint leaking 278-308 Low pipe camera under water 308-370 Low pipe 3 - 4 inches low 372 Manhole #27 at end of Main Street 4206 Line seems to be quite dirty. TV INSPECTION REPORT — 1car 'SOLIDIFICATION INC. 4-6-92 25 0 i DATE: PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. 'p41,- MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #27 TO: MU #28 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: _ PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 8 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 377 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR x CLAY CONCRETE _x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE _ COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS _ NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #27 at end of Main Street - manhole leaking 4206 57 Joint leaking approximately 1 g.p.m. 139 Service Right tap ok 142-165 Low pipe 3 - 4 inches low — 165-217 Camera under water 271 Roots in joint #1 274-302 Low pipe 3 - 4 inches low 302-356 Camera under water 356-377 Low pipe 4 - 5 inches low _ 377 Manhole #28 at end of Market Street 4353 Line may be dirty, water standing the whole way. . TV INSPECTION REPORT . SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 0 o DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 26 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. WA, Ati, MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 ONN:: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #28 TO: MH #29 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 18 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 189 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #28 at end of Market Street - plugged at 4353 this manhole - manhole has small leaks 02-45 8 - 10 inches of standing water & debris 15 Large pile of debris 36 Roots in joint #3 45-189 Pipe very dirty 3 - 5 inches of debris 126 Service 12:00 tap - protruding about 2 inches 157 Joint leaking approximately 1 g.p.m. 158 Service Right tap ok 189 Manhole #29 4450 — Line is very dirty _ TV INSPECTION REPORT - >°`' 1C4. SOLIDIFICATION, INC. y 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota _ (612) 535-1065 Minnesota River - Easement �► J ON: — FROM: MH #29 TO: MH #30 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: _ PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 16 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 188 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x ._ DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #30 4450 02-188 Very dirty 2 - 3 inches of debris 188 Manhole #30 at Minnesota Street 4517 TV INSPECTION REPORT �., SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 28 y DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota VA"' (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement J FROM: MH #30 TO: MH #31 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X DEPTH: 10 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 359 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR X _ TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE X DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR X TRUSS INDUSTRIAL _ POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #30 at Minnesota Street 4517 02-359 Dirty 2 - 21/2 inches of debris 46 Joint dripping 78 Joint dripping 115 Service Right tap ok 163 Service 12:00 tap ok 182 Roots in joint #1 - joint is leaking 215 Service Right tap ok 289 Service Right tap ok 292 Service Right tap ok 337 Service Right tap ok 359 Manhole #31 at end of Dakota Street 4650 Line is quite dirty through out TV INSPECTION REPORT — 'c4, SOLIDIFICATION, INC. yy i DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 29 — 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 - � ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #31 TO: MH #32 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: — PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 3 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 364 Ft. GRAVEL _ EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x — DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE _ COMMERCIAL FAIR ? TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS — NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #31 at end of Dakota Street 4650 Manhole is buried - can not find • 02 Very dirty 2 - 22 inches of debris 09 Joint leak approximately 5 g.p.m. 9 — 17 Joint leaking heavy approximately 4 g.p.m. 10 142 Service 12:00 tap ok — 153 Joint dripping 203 Service Right tap ok 241 Roots at joint #2 joint is leaking approximately 1 g.p.m. — 273 Joint leaking approximately lg.p.m. 321 Joint leaking approximately 2 g.p.m. — 364 Manhole #32 4799 Line is quite dirty through out — TV INSPECTION REPORT ‘QI r C4 SOLIDIFICATION INC y� o DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 30 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTHShort Elliott Hendrickson,. Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 FOR: (612) 535-1065 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota ► ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #32TO: MH #33 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 9 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 360 Ft. GRAVEL _ EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON _ POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: — PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #32 at end of Prairie Street - MH plugged 4799 02-368 Dirty 2 - 21/2 inches of debris 31 Joint dripping 55 Joint dripping 63 Service Right tap ok 68 Service Right tap ok 121 Service Right tap ok 145 Joint leaking approximately 2 g.,p.m. 11 194 Leak through barrel approximately 1/2 g.p.m. 200 Joint leaking approximately 1 g.p.m. 211 Service Right tap ok 318 Service 12:00 tap ok 360 Joint leaking approximately 1/2 g.p.m. 368 Manhole #33 4970 Line is quite dirty throught out TV INSPECTION REPORT - SOLIDIFICATION INC 0 '1 DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 31 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc:— MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #33 TO: MH #34 — LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT _ DOWNSTREAM X DEPTH: 9 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 295 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION __ GOOD OTHER: FAIR x — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE X _ DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #33 4970 — 02-295 Dirty 2 - 3 inches of debris 05 Joint dripping 76 Joint dripping — 125 Service 12:00 tap ok 140 Roots in joint #4 - leaking 228 Joint dripping 295 Manhole #34 5111 Line is quite dirty through out TV INSPECTION REPORT • SOLIDIFICATION, INC. yy o DATE: 4-8-92 _ PAGE NO. 32 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTHShort Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 FOR: — f�� (612) 535-1065 AT: Shakopee,. Minnesota 9�� ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: MH #34 TO: MH #35 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x DEPTH: 10 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM LINE LENGTH: 112 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo - MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #34 5111 02-112 Dirty 3 - 4 inches of debris 22 Joint leaking approximately 1/2 g.p.m. 112 Manhole #35 manhole is leaking 5178 Line may be 4 - 5 inches low between 10 ' & 90' hard to tell because of dirt TV INSPECTION REPORT — ,��'' 'c4. SOLIDIFICATION INC. y i DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 33 _ 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson" Inc. `( MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 �� � (612) 535-1065 AT: Shakopee. Minnesota A/J _ J ON: Minnesota River - Easement — FROM: MH t37 TO: MH #36 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: — PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM DEPTH: 23 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM x LINE LENGTH: 286 Ft. GRAVEL _ EASEMENT x SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR x — TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE x _ DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD x TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR — OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #37 at lift station - plugged at MH #35 5178 157 Joint leaking - dripping 188-199 3 good size rocks 205 Offset joint approximately 2 inches — 205-240 Low pipe 3 - 4 inches low - also dirty 286 Manhole #36 5270 Line is dirty most of the way TV INSPECTION REPORT '��•, SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-8-92 34 y o DATE: PAGENO. 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTHFOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. - MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota(612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement FROM: Mil #36 TO: _ MH #35 LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM DEPTH: 10 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM X LINE LENGTH: 300 Ft. GRAVEL EASEMENT X SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION: STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD OTHER: FAIR X TYPE: CAST IRON POOR CLAY CONCRETE X DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION: PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR _ OTHER RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO: AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: EP Ft. From Video Photo MH REMARKS Ft. No. 00 Manhole #36 5270 40-300 Very dirty 3 - 4 inches of debris 265 Large rock in the pipe 300 Manhole #35 5400 Line is quite dirty through out .•. - - . i".":: :.r .E.-::.....7..........:"... -- . -: -_____L.7.-......,..,....._.-....,t.=. '-..=-..=---1-_, - yT _7 _ � ` .: : I• li_ i ,_ rte. -0< . X.....;.-%.: , _ _ 1 ' • Y .1 _ _ .9 co _ � .r--47." i - :::.-1-= r - _{ _ y r. I - - - - - f - C: - OD f- • • • w ♦ i. • • em ------_----.--.:- ._::: _..- 7... --- _ :. x ......i Cr i 1 4 ." i . _ .=_._......_ ,.. ,. .... . ,,_ :1 � o - _ a: .:...-N,., :: ---- ,............,•-----:1"-":"7s:r7.'"'.' Y,. 3 • `n t N • — zr �_. y- • 3 • • a....441411. • f - 1 O j 1..1 i — E -�. ; i • rt i I j , poen — := i v -0CT)C 1 <v2 �` . oo _ . a1 • Aliiii1W11111111111111111ra '_"" '�'�"�_ �ert' . APPENDIX A4 FLUOROMETRIC STUDY OF I/I IN RIVER TRUNK SEWER,1992 INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY SANITARY SEWER INTERCEPTOR SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA SEC DONOHUE PROJECT NO. M2365.00 APRIL, 1992 PREPARED FOR: SEH, INC. ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA PREPARED BY: SEC DONOHUE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 .0 INTRODUCTION 1 — 2.0 PROJECT SCOPE 2 3.0 PROCEDURES 4 4.0 DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS 6 5.0 RESULTS 8 6.0 SUMMARY 9 List of Tables Table 1 - Section #1 Flow Rate Data Table 2 - Section #2 Flow Rate Data Table 3 - Section #3 Flow Rate Data Table 4 - Flow Monitoring Results List of Figures Figure 1 - Sanitary Sewer Interceptor Monitoring Locations Figure 2 - Fluorescent Dye Flow Rate Measurement Figure 3 - Section #1 Flow Rate Results Figure 4 - Section #2 Flow Rate Results Figure 5 - Section #3 Flow Rate Results 1 .0 INTRODUCTION This report presents results of flow monitoring performed on a section of sanitary sewer interceptor located along the South bank of the Minnesota River in Shakopee,. Minnesota. The interceptor section under study is shown in Figure 1 . The purpose of this study is to determine rates of inflow/infiltration along the interceptor. The flow monitoring work presented in this report involved the use of fluoresent dye injection, sampling, and analysis to determine flow rates at several points along the interceptor. The flow monitoring was performed during low flow conditions in the early morning of March 22, 1992. The organization of this report is presented below: Section Description 2 Scope 3 Procedures 4 Data presentation and analysis 5 Results 6 Summary This work was completed according to our proposal dated March 10, 1992. 1 2.0 PROJECT SCOPE This section presents the scope of dye injection, sampling, and analysis used to determine flow rates along the portion of the Shakopee interceptor shown in Figure 1 . The flow rate results are used to determine the magnatude of inflow/infiltration. For the purpose of this work, manhole locations are designated by numbers , decreasing from the lift station manhole (MH #37) . Figure 1 shows the locations of all — manholes used in the flow monitoring work. 2. 1 PRELIMINARY INSPECTION A preliminary inspection of the interceptor was performed on March _ 13, 1992 to determine the accessibility of manhole locations and to finalize the project scope. Manhole locations were sighted with the assistance of Mr. Ray Ruske of the city of Shakopee. The results of the inspection are summarized below: — • Surcharged flow conditions were observed in Manhole #2 due to large discharges from Rahr Malting over 1 ,000 feet downstream. • The flow monitoring work must be performed during a period of minimum discharge from Rahr Malting. • Manholes #9, #10 and #11 could not be located due to high water conditions and a lack of marking posts. • Assistance from city staff would be helpful in locating and opening manholes during the flow monitoring work. 2.2 PROJECT SCOPE The scope of the flow monitoring work was determined based on the inspection results and the desire to include •as much of the interceptor length as possible. The monitoring work was coordinated with Rahr Malting to limit the malting flow to two intermittant processes . As a result, the interceptor under study — was segmented into three sections. 2 Each section was chosen to allow upstream and downstream flow rate measurement without major inputs between monitoring points . Thus , any increase in flow could be attributed to inflow/infiltration. The three interceptor sections monitored in this study are listed below. The interceptor section from MH#8 to MH#12 was excluded from the study due to inputs from Rahr Malting and unaccessable manhole locations. Pipe Upstream Downstream Diameter Distance Section Location Location (Inches) (Feet) 1 MH #3 MH #8 15 1149 2 MH #12 MH #25 18 2681 3 MH #25 MH #37 21 3999 3 3.0 PROCEDURES The determination of flow rates by a fluorescent dye analysis is shown schematically in Figure 2. A dye solution of known concentration (ci ) is injected at a constant rate (Qi ) upstream of the monitoring locations . Flow rates are determined at each monitoring point by analyzing wastewater samples for dye concentration (Cs) and calculating flow rates via the equation (Qi ) (Ci ) = (Qs) (Cs) . Rhodamine WT fluorescent dye is used as the tracing compound since it is non—toxic, nonreactive, and is easily measured at low concentrations . Dye concentration is measured using a Turner Designs, Model 10 fluorometer. Background wastewater samples are collected upstream of dye injection points for preparation of standards used to calibrate the fluorometer. Use of background wastewater in standards preparation compensates for minor losses in fluorescence which may occur through contact with the wastestream. 3. 1 DYE INJECTION AND WASTEWATER SAMPLING _ For this project, dye injection and background sampling was performed at two locations (see Figure 1 ) . Manhole #2 was used as the dye injection point for Sections #1 and #2. Due to the relatively large flow input at MH #25, a second dye injection system was installed in the manhole located at the intersection of 169 and Spencer Avenue. Each dye injection location was equipped with a carboy of dye solution, a positive displacement injection pump, and an automatic sampler. Background wastewater samples were collected upstream of dye injection throughout the period of dye injection by an ISCO automatic sampler. The dye solution concentration and pump flow rate were determined based on an estimate of wastewater flow to yield stream dye concentrations within the sensitivity range of the fluorometer. 4 Wastewater samples were collected at upstream and downstream locations within each of the three interceptor sections . At each location samples were collected using peristaltic pumps sampling upstream of any flow inputs . The intent of the sampling was to allow determination of flow rates over the same relative period at both upstream and downstream locations. Sampling was initiated at MH #3 at 2:50 AM. Samples were collected at 30 second intervals until 3:35 AM at which time a slug of concentrated dye was added. Sampling at downstream interceptor monitoring locations was initiated based on estimated dye travel times and continued until the dye slug was observed. Samples were collected every 30 seconds; however, gaps in sampling did occur due to pumping difficulties and extended sampling periods. 3.2 FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS AND FLOW RATE CALCULATION Each wastewater sample collected from an interceptor monitoring point was analyzed for dye concentration. A flow rate was then calculated for each sample based on the measured dye concentrations and the rate of dye injection. Fluorescence measurement was performed and converted to dye concentration using project specific standards. Standards were prepared by diluting samples of the injected dye with the collected background samples. A second set of standards were prepared using deionized water for dilution to determine the decrease in fluorescence caused by constituents of the wastewater. Comparison of the deionized water and background standards found that the two standards agreed within 96%, thus a significant reduction in fluorescence did not occur. 5 4.0 DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS This section presents the flow rate data, field observations, and the basis for comparing upstream and downstream flows. This information is presented separately for each of the three interceptor sections . 4. 1 SECTION #1 For Section #1 , flow rates were determined and compared at monitoring locations MH #3 and MH #8. The flow rate data for each location are presented on Table 1 . The respective flow rates from each location were compared based on the observed dye slug travel time, 17 minutes. Flow rates are compared over a 45 minute period and are shown on Figure 3. 4.2 SECTION #2 Flow rates for Section #2 were determined and compared at monitoring locations MH #12 and the upstream side of MH #25. Flow rate data for each location are presented on Table 2. Flow rates were compared based on the observed dye slug travel time of 61 minutes. As shown on Figure 4, high flows were observed at both locations over short periods due to inputs from Rahr Malting. Due to the resulting flow pattern, flow rates could only be compared over a 17 minute period between peaks . 4.3 SECTION #3 For Section #3, flow rates were determined upstream by adding the two flow inputs to MH #25. Significant infiltration was observed _ in MH #25 through several holes on the West side of the manhole just above the crown of the upstream pipe. Downstream flow rates were monitored at MH #37. As shown on Figure 1 , there is a potential for minor flow inputs between these locations at MH #28 and MH #35. However, MH #28 was inspected during sampling at MH #37 and no flow was observed. Also, it is likely that no flow was added at MH #35 due to the small service area and its location within an inactive portion of the city. 6 Flow rate data for the upstream and downstream monitoring locations are presented in Table 3. Flow rates are shown in Figure 5. Flow rates were compared over a period of 41 minutes based on the observed dye slug travel time and a match of flow patterns . A travel time of 55 minutes was used. 7 5.0 RESULTS Table 4 presents the flow monitoring results for each interceptor section. Results are presented in terms of inflow/infiltration (I/I) rate and average flow velocity. I/I rates are presented in units of gallons per day per inch diameter per mile of pipe. As shown, the measured I/I range from 1500 to 3608 (GPD/In/Mi ) . These rates are excessive considering that many municipal codes limit the acceptable infiltration rate to 500 (GPD/In/Mi ) . However, it should be noted that the infiltration rates presented were measured during high water conditions . Also, much of the interceptor is surcharged under normal operations of Rahr Malting. The average flow velocity measured ranged from 0.73 to 1 .21 feet per second. These values are low and indicate that an accumulation of solids will occur. Several inches of accumulated solids were observed within the interceptor at MH #2 and MH #28. These were the only interceptor manholes entered. 8 6.0 SUMMARY The following statements summarize the results of this I/I study. • Surcharged flow conditions were observed within MH #2 under normal operation of Rahr Malting approximately 1 ,000 feet upstream of the Rahr Malting discharge input. • Excessive I/I rates were measured in each of the three interceptor sections with the highest I/I measured in Section #2. The I/I ranged from 1500 to 3608 (GPD/In/Mi ) . • Travel time measurements found that average velocities were low within each section, especially in Section #2. Several inches of _ accumulated solids were observed within each of the two manholes entered. 9 - TABLE 1 SECTION #1 FLOW RATE DATA SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY _ SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA IiMANHOL3 OLE#8 l ANALYZED MARE# CH 25.1992 11 ANALYZED MARCH 26.1992 ELAPSED 11ML- 'I 1ME 01- t•LOG RA I b II SAMPLE I IME 01- 11 FLOW M)1 E I (MINUTES) I SAMPLE II ( J` 7�y 0 02:50:00 AM 73.4 03:01:00 AM 74.0 03:07:30 AM 75.7 - 0.5 02:50:30 AM 1 02:51:00 AM 74.0 03:08:00 AM 76.3 30 AM 77.7 75.2 03:08: 1.5 02:51:30 AM ' 2 02:52:00 AM 74.6 03:09:00 AM 77.9 2.5 02:52:30 AM 74.6 03:09:30 AM 78.1 3 02:53:00 AM 76.5 03:10:00 AM 77.9 • 3.5 02:53:30 AM 76.5 03:10:30 AM 77.9 4 02:54:00 AM 77.2 03:11:00 AM 77.9 4.5 02:54:30 AM 77.2 03:11:30 AM 80.1 5 02:55:00 AM 77.8 03:12:00 AM 80.5 5.5 02:55:30 AM 77.8 03:12:30 AM 80.8 6 02:56:00 AM 78.5 03:13:00 AM 82.3 6.5 02:56:30 AM 78.6 03:13:30 AM 81.5 7 02:57:00 AM 79.2 03:14:00 AM 82.1 7.5 02:57:30 AM 79.9 03:14:30 AM 82.4 8 02:58:00 AM 79.9 03:15:00 AM 81.4 8.5 02:58:30 AM 80.6 03:15:30 AM 83.1 9 02:59:00 AM 82.0 03:16:00 AM 83.7 9.5 02:59:30 AM 81.6 03:16:30 AM 83.8 10 03:00:00 AM 81.3 03:17:00 AM 83.7 10.5 03:00:30 AM 82.0 03:17:30 AM 83.2 ..- 11 03:01:00 AM 82.8 03:18:00 AM 83.7 11.5 03:01:30 AM 83.2 03:18:30 AM 83.7 12 03:02:00 AM 84.3 03:19:00 AM 84.0 12.5 03:02:30 AM 83.5 03:19:30 AM 83.8 13 03:03:00 AM 82.8 03:20:00 AM 83.8 13.5 03:03:30 AM 82.5 03:20:30 AM 84.2 14 03:04:00 AM 83.1 03:21:00 AM 83.8 14.5 03:04:30 AM 83.1 03:21:30 AM 83.8 - 15 03:05:00 AM 80.6 03:22:00 AM 83.8 15.5 03:05:30 AM 81.3 03:22:30 AM 83.8 16 03:06:00 AM 79.9 03:23:00 AM 83.8 16.5 03:06:30 AM 80.6 03:23:30 AM 83.8 17 03:07:00 AM 80.6 03:24:00 AM 83.8 17.5 03:07:30 AM 81.9 03:24:30 AM 86.4 18 03:08:00 AM 80.6 03:25:00 AM 86.3 18.5 03:08:30 AM 82.0 03:25:30 AM 87.5 19 03:09:00 AM 83.2 03:26:00 AM 87.1 - 19.5 03.09:30 AM 82.3 03:26:30 AM 87.1 20 03:10:00 AM 82.8 03:27:00 AM 87.5 20.5 03:10:30 AM 83.5 03:27:30 AM 88.9 21 03:11:00 AM 83.1 03:23:00 AM 89.2 21.5 03:11:30 AM 85.1 03:28:30 AM 90.3 22 03:12:00 AM 86.0 • 03:29:00 AM `7 22.5 03:12:30 AM 36.2 03:29:30 AM 11.1 - TABLE 1 (CONTINUED) SECTION #1 FLOW RATE DATA SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MANHOLE#3 MANHOLE#8 - II ANALYZED MARCH 25.1992 II ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 I ELAPSED(MINUTES)1L I I IME OF SAMPLE I 1-LOW( P)1E I SAMPLE TIME 01. I t L(GPM)1E 23 03:13:00 AM 83.5 03:30:00 AM 90.7 23.5 03:13:30 AM 84.3 03:30:30 AM 90.7 24 03:14:00 AM 85.7 03:31:00 AM 90.9 24.5 03:14:30 AM 84.6 03:31:30 AM 84.0 25 03:15:00 AM 86.0 _ 25.5 03:15:30 AM 84.3 12:00:30 AM 90.7 6 03:16:00 AM 84.3 12:01:00 AM 26.5 03:16:30 AM 85.1 12:01:30 AM 88.9 27 03:17:00 AM 86.0 12:02:00 AM 89.8 - 27.5 03:17:30 AM 86.0 12:02:30 AM 90.7 28 03:18:00 AM 86.0 12:03:00 AM 90.7 28.5 03:18:30 AM 85.9 12:03:30 AM 90.7 29 03:19:00 AM 85.7 12:04:00 AM 90.7 29.5 03:19:30 AM 85.7 12:04:30 AM 91.1 - 30 03:20:00 AM 85.7 12:05:00 AM 91.1 30.5 03:20:30 AM 85.9 12:05:30 AM 90.7 31 03:21:00 AM 87.5 12:06:00 AM 90.9 31.5 03:21:30 AM 86.2 12:06:30 AM 90.7 - 32 03:22:00 AM 85.6 12:07:00 AM 88.7 32.$ 03:22:30 AM 84.0 12:07:30 AM 89.6 33 03:23:00 AM 85.1 12:08:00 AM 88.9 33.5 03:23:30 AM 85.1 12:08:30 AM 89.22 34 03:24:00 AM 83.2 12:09:00 AM 90.7 34.5 03:24:30 AM 82.5 12:09:30 AM 88.9 35 03:25:00 AM 83.5 12:10:00 AM 87.5 35.5 03:25:30 AM 84.3 12:10:30 AM 87.1 - 36 03:26:00 AM 86.2 12:11:00 AM 87.1 36.5 03:26:30 AM 85.6 12:11:30 AM 88.9 37 03:27:00 AM 85.6 12:12:00 AM 87.5 37.5 03:27:30 AM 85.1 12:12:30 AM 88.5 38 03:28:00 AM 82.8 12:13:00 AM 88.9 - 38.5 03:28:30 AM 83.5 12:13:30 AM 88.9 39 03:29:00 AM 82.8 12:14:00 AM 87.1 39.5 03:29:30 AM 82.0 12:14:30 AM 87.1 40 03:30:00 AM 81.7 12:15:00 AM 85.9 - 40.5 03:30:30 AM 81.6 12:15:30 AM 85.4 41 03:31:00 AM 81.3 12:16:00 AM 86.8 41.5 03:31:30 AM 81.0 12:16:30 AM 85.3 42 03:32:00 AM 82.5 12:17:00 AM 83.8 - 42.5 03:32:30 AM 84.3 12:17:30 AM 83.8 43 03:33:00 AM 82.9 12:18:00 AM 85.4 43.5 03:33:30 AM 82.8 12:18:30 AM 85.3 44 03:34:00 AM 83.5 12:19:00 AM 85.4 44.5 03:34:30 AM '82.8 12:19:30 AM 85.8 . AVERAGE I 2:50-3:35 1 82.3 1 3:07-3:51 1 85.7 TABLE 2 SECTION #2 FLOW RATE DATA SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MANIIOLb#12 MANHOLE#2.7 UPS1 REAM ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 bLAI'SED1!Mb DIME OF 1-LOW RAIL TIME OF PLOW RA 1 E - (MINUTES) SAMPLE (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM) 12 03:19:00 AM 178.6 04:20:00 AM 119.0 12.5 03:19:30 AM 166.7 04:20:30 AM 135.8 13 03:20:00 AM 153.2 04:21:00 AM 155.0 - 13.5 03:20:30 AM 153.2 04:21:30 AM 177.0 14 03:21:00 AM 148.1 04:22:00 AM 208.1 14.5 03:21:30 AM 139.0 04:22:30 AM 249.7 15 03:22:00 AM 143.4 04:23:00 AM 298.0 - 15.5 03:22:30 AM 132.9 04:23:30 AM 347.4 16 03:23:00 AM 119.5 04:24:00 AM 394.9 • 16.5 03:23:30 AM 114.3 04:24:30 AM 440.1 17 03:24:00 AM 112.1 04:25:00 AM 457.5 _ 17.5 03:24:30 AM 106.3 04:25:30 AM • 462.1 18 03:25:00 AM 103.8 04:26:00 AM 453.0 18.5 03:25:30 AM 101.5 04:26:30 AM 435.9 19 03:26:00 AM 99.3 04:27:00 AM 398.3 19.5 03:26:30 AM 99.3 04:27:30 AM 358.2 - 20 03:27:00 AM 97.1 04:28:00 AM 323.1 20.5 03:27:30 AM 95.1 04:28:30 AM 298.0 21 03:28:00 AM 91.2 04:29:00 AM 265.5 21.5 03:28:30 AM 89.4 04:29:30 AM 236.9 - 22 03:29:00 AM 86.0 04:30:00 AM 213.8 22.5 03:29:30 AM 84.4 04:30:30 AM 196.5 23 03:30:00 AM 82.9 04:31:00 AM 175.0 23.5 03:30:30 AM 82.9 04:31:30 AM 164.4 -- 24 03:31:00 AM 82.9 04:32:00 AM 153.4 24.5 03:31:30 AM 84.4 04:32:30 AM 140.8 25 03:32:00 AM 86.0 04:33:00 AM 131.6 25.5 04:33:30 AM 123.8 - 26 04:34:00 AM 117.5 26.5 04:34:30 AM 111.8 27 04:35:00 AM 106.2 27.5 04:35:30 AM 104.2 - 28 04:36:00 AM 100.6 28.5 04:36:30 AM 96.6 29 04:37:00 AM 94.6 29.5 04:37:30 AM 93.7 30 04:38:00 AM 92.8 - 30.5 04:38:30 AM 95.5 31 04:39:00 AM 100.8 31.5 04:39:30 AM 106.8 32 03:39:00 AM 117.3 04:40:00 AM 119.8 - 32.5 03:39:30 AM 173.8 04:40:30 AM 108.6 33 03:40:00 AM 604.9 04:41:00 AM 210.2 33.5 03:40:30 AM 158.5 04:41:30 AM 244.0 34 03:41:00 AM 135.3 04:42:00 AM 295.0 - 34.5 03:41:30 AM 130.9 04:42:30 AM 299.4• • 35 03:42:00 AM 123.8 04:43:00 AM 327.7 35.5 03:42:30 AM 123.8 04:43:30 AM 286.9 • • 36 03:43:00 AM . 123.8 04:44:00 AM 251.1 • - 36.5 03:43:30 AM 108.8 04:44:30 AM 224.2 • 37 03:44:00 AM 103.8 04:45:00 AM 203.5 . 37.5 03:44:30 AM 103.8 04:45:30 AM 207.1 38 03:45:00 AM 102.6 04:46:00 AM 172.3 • - 38.5 03:45:30 AM 101.5 . 04:46:30 AM . 157.6 . TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) SECTION #2 FLOW RATE DATA SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA • MANHOLE#12 MANHOLE#25 UPS I REAM ANALYZED MARCH 26.1992 ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 ELAPSED 11ME TIME OF I-LOW RA 1 E 11ME 01- 1-LOW RA"I E - (MINUTES) SAMPLE (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM) 39 03:46:00 AM 101.5 04:47:00 AM 147.6 39.5 03:46:30 AM 95.1 04:47:30 AM 138.7 40 03:47:00 AM 95.1 04:48:00 AM 134.6 40.5 03:47:30 AM 93.1 04:48:30 AM 125.5 41 03:48:00 AM 95.1 04:49:00 AM 122.2 41.5 03:48:30 AM 95.1 04:49:30 AM 117.5 42 03:49:00 AM 91.? 04:50:00 AM 113.2 42.5 03:49:30 AM 91.2 04:50:30 AM 111.8 - 43 03:50:00 AM 91.2 04:51:00 AM 111.8 43.5 03:50:30 AM 91.2 44 03:51:00 AM 91.2 04:52:00 AM 106.4 44.5 03:51:30 AM 93.1 45 03:52:00 AM 91.1 04:53:00 AM 106.4 45.5 03:52:30 AM 91.2 46 03:53:00 AM 90.3 04:54:00 AM 105.4 46.5 03:53:30 AM 91.2 47 03:54:00 AM 93.1 04:55:00 AM 104.2 47.5 03:54:30 AM 91.2 48 03:55:00 AM 93.1 04:56:00 AM 106.2 48.5 03:55:30 AM 91.? - 49 03:56:00 AM 89.4 04:57:00 AM 106.9 49.5 03:56:30 AM 89.4 50 03:57:00 AM 89.4 04:58:00 AM 114.6 50.5 03:57:30 AM 91.2 - 51 03:58:00 AM 91.2 04:59:00 AM 109.2 51.5 03:58:30 AM 89.8 52 03:59:00 AM 91.2 05:00:00 AM 111.8 52.5 03:59:30 AM 91.2 ._ 53 04:00:00 AM 89.8 05:01.00 AM 111.8 53.5 04:00:30 AM 91.2 54 04:01:00 AM 93.1 05:02:00 AM 123.8 54.5 04:01:30 AM 93.1 _ 55 04:02:00 AM 91.2 05:03:00 AM 123.8 55.5 04:02:30 AM 91.2 56 04:03:00 AM 91.? 05:04:00 AM 1/7.? 56.5 0.1:03:30 AM 93.3 57 04:04:00 AM 95.1 05:05:00 AM 130.8 57.5 04:04:30 AM 95.1 58 04:05:00 AM 97.1 05:06:00 AM 130.1 58.5 04:05:30 AM 95.1 59 04:06:00 AM 93.1 05:07:00 AM 123.8 '- 59.5 04:06:30 AM 91.2 60 04:07:00 AM 90.3 05:08:00 AM 153.4 60.5 04:07:30 AM 90.9 61 04:08:00 AM 90.9 05:09:00 AM 198.2 �- 61.5 04:08:30 AM 91.0. 62 04:09:00 AM 117.3 05:10:00 AM 69.7 62.5 04:09:30 AM 220.5 63 04:10:00 AM 477.0 05:11:00 AM 64.8 63.5 04:10:30 AM 604.9 64 04:11:00 AM 477.0 64.5 04:11:30AM 192.3 65 • 04:12:00 AM 63.1 • AVERAGE 1 . 3:49-4:06 I 91.81 4:50-5:07 114.7 1 TABLE 3 SECTION #3 FLOW RATE DATA - SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MANHOLE#2,UPS"!REAM MANHOLE#25 SPENCER SEC i ION#3 MANHOLE#37 ELAPSED ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 UPSTREAM ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 TIME TIME OF FLOW RATE TIME OF FLOW RATE FLOW RATE TIME OF FLOW RATE - (MINUTES) SAMPLE (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM) (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM) 0 04:08:00 AM 106.2 04:08:00 AM 164.4 270.5 0.5 04:08:30 AM _ 10L9 04:08:30 AM 164.4 266.3 1 04:09:00 AM 100.8 04:09:00 AM 160.3 261.1 _ 1.5 04:09:30 AM 97.8 04:09:30 AM 159.7 257.5 2 04:10:00 AM 97.2 04:10:00 AM 159.7 256.9 2.5 04:10:30 AM 96.6 04:10:30 AM 159.7 256.3 3 04:11:00 AM 96.0 04:11:00 AM 158.2 254.2 3.5 04:11:30 AM 94.6 04:11:30 AM 158.2 252.8 4 04:12:00 AM 94.1 ' 04:12:00 AM 158.2 252.3 4.5 04:12:30 AM 93.9 04:12:30 AM 156.7 250.6 5 04:13:00 AM 93.9 04:13:00 AM 156.7 250.6 5.5 04:13:30 AM 93.7 04:13:30 AM 156.7 250.4 6 04:14:00 AM 93.3 04:14:00 AM 153.9 247.2 6.5 04:14:30 AM 92.7 04:14:30 AM 152.5 245.2 7 04:15:00 AM 91.8 04:15:00 AM 152.5 244.3 05:10:00 AM 320.8 7.5 04:15:30 AM 104.5 04:15:30 AM 153.9 258.4 05:10:30 AM 316.8 - 8 04:16:00 AM 90.9 04:16:00 AM 151.1 242.0 05:11:00 AM 316.8 8.5 04:16:30 AM 90.9 04:16:30 AM 151.1 242.0 05:11:30 AM 316.8 9 04:17:00 AM 90.9 04:17:00 AM 149.8 240.7 05:12:00 AM 309.0 9.5 04:17:30 AM 91.8 04:17:30 AM 148.7 240.5 05:12:30 AM 309.0 - 10 04:18:00 AM 93.3 04:18:00 AM 148.5 241.8 05:13:00 AM 301.6 10.5 04:18:30 AM 96.6 04:18:30 AM 151.1 247.7 05:13:30 AM 302.4 11 04:19:00 AM 101.5 04:19:00 AM 153.9 255.4 05:14:00 AM 302.4 11.5 04:19:30 AM 107.2 04:19:30 AM 153.9 261.0 05:14:30 AM 303.8 _ 12 04:20:00 AM 119.0 04:20:00 AM ' 153.3 272.3 05:15:00 AM 309.0 12.5 04:20:30 AM 135.8 04:20:30 AM 153.6 289.4 05:15:30 AM 312.9 13 04:21:00 AM 155.0 04:21:00 AM 153.6 308.6 05:16:00 AM 330.9 13.5 04:21:30 AM 177.0 04:21:30 AM 153.9 330.8 05:16:30 AM 316.8 _ 14 04:22:00 AM 208.1 04:22:00 AM 153.9 361.9 05:17:00 AM 334.5 14.5 04:22:30 AM 249.7 04:22:30 AM 153.9 403.6 05:17:30 AM 347.4 15 04:23:00 AM 298.0 04:23:00 AM 152.5 450.5 05:18:00 AM 362.4 15.5 04:23:30 AM 347.4 04:23:30 AM 152.5 499.9 05:18:30 AM 373.1 16 04:24:00 AM 394.9 04:24:00 AM 151.1 546.0 05:19:00 AM 391.6 - 16.5 04:24:30 AM 440.1 04:24:30 AM 152.5 592.6 05:19:30 AM 409.5 17 04:25:00 AM 457.5 04:25:00 AM 152.5 610.0 05:20:00 AM 437.9 17.5 04:25:30 AM 462.1 04:25:30 AM 153.9 616.0 05:20:30 AM 453.7 18 04:26:00 AM 453.0 04:26:00 AM 153.9 606.9 05:21:00 AM 455.3 - 18.5 04:26:30 AM 435.9 04:26:30 AM 153.9 589.8 05:21:30 AM 470.7 19 04:27:00 AM 398.3 04:27:00 AM 151.1 549.4 05:22:00 AM 488.9 19.5 04:27:30 AM 358.2 04:27:30 AM 151.1 509.3 05:22:30 AM 479.6 20 04:28:00 AM 323.1 04:28:00 AM 149.8 472.9 05:23:00 AM 479.6 - 20.5 04:28:30 AM 298.0 04:28:30 AM 149.8 447.8 05:23:30 AM 457.0 21 04:29:00 AM 265.5 04:29:00 AM 149.0 414.5 05:24:00 AM 455.3 21.5 04:29:30 AM 236.9 04:29:30 AM 149.8 386.7 05:24:30 AM 450.5 • 22 04::30:00 AM 213.8 " 04:30:00 AM . 148.5 362.3 05:25:00 AM 437.9 22.5 04:30:30 AM 196.5 04:30:30 AM 146.9 343.5 • 05:25:30 AM . 423.2 23 04:31:00 AM 175.0 04:31:00 AM 148.7 323.7 • 05:26:00 AM 400.4. 23.5 04:31:30 AM 164.4 04:31:30 AM 149.8 314.2 • 0526:30 AM • 384.5 • 24 04:32:00 AM 153.4 04:32:00 AM 151.1 304.6 05:27:00 AM 374.2 • _ 24.5 04:32:30 AM 140.8 04:32:30 AM 151.1 291.9 05:27:30 AM 375.3 25 04:33:00 AM 131.6 04:33:00 AM 149.5 281.1 05:28:00 AM 369.8 25.5 04:33:30 AM 1218 04:33:30 AM 151.1 274.9 05:28:30 AM 3522 26 04:34:00 AM 117.5 04:34:00 AM 149.8 267.3 05:29:00 AM 342.6 26.5 04:34:30 AM 111.8 04:34:30 AM_ 151.7 263.5 05:29:30 AM 334.5 27 04:35:00 AM 106.2 04:35:00 AM 151.1 • 257.3 • 05:30:00 AM 325.0 275 04:35:30 AM 104.2 04:35:30 AM 152.5 256.7 05:30:30 AM 3192 a TABLE 3 (CONTINUED) SECTION #3 FLOW RATE DATA SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MANI IOLL#25 UPS I REAM MANHOLE#25 SPENCER SL•C 1"ION#3 MANHOLE#37 ELAPSED ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 ANALYZED MARCH 26.1992 UPSTREAM ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 TIME TIME OF FLOW RATE TIME OF FLOW RATE FLOW RATE TIME OF FLOW RATE - (MINUTES) SAMPLE (GPM) _ SAMPLE (GPM) (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM) 28 04:36:00 AM 100.6 04:36:00 AM 151.7 252.3 05:31:00 AM 319.2 28.5 04:36:30 AM 96.6 04:36:30 AM 149.0 245.6 05:31:30 AM 316.8 29 04:37:00 AM 94.6 04:37:00 AM 148.5 243.1 05:32:00 AM 316.8 29.5 04:37:30 AM 93.7 04:37:30 AM 150.9 244.5 05:32:30 AM 316.8 30 04:38:00 AM 92.8 04:38:00 AM 151.4 244.2 05:33:00 AM 333.6 30.5 04:38:30 AM 95.5 04:38:30 AM 148.7 244.2 05:33:30 AM 342.6 31 04:39:00 AM 100.8 04:39:00 AM 147.2 248.0 05:34:00 AM 362.4 _ 31.5 04:39:30 AM 106.8 04:39:30 AM 146.9 253.7 05:34:30 AM 396.6 32 04:40:00 AM 119.8 04:40:00 AM 148.2 268.0 05:35:00 AM 409.5 32.5 04:40:30 AM 108.6 04:40:30 AM 145.7 254.2 05:35:30 AM 427.5 33 04:41:00 AM 210.2 04:41:00 AM 145.4 355.6 05:36:00 AM 452.1 _ 33.5 04:41:30 AM 244.0 04:41:30 AM 144.7 388.6 05:36:30 AM 453.7 34 04:42:00 AM 295.0 04:42:00 AM 144.7 439.6 05:37:00 AM 453.7 34.5 04:42:30 AM 299.4 144.5 443.9 05:37:30 AM 488.9 35 04:43:00 AM 327.7 144.3 472.0 05:38:00 AM 426.1 35.5 04:43:30 AM 286.9 144.1 431.0 05:38:30 AM 453.7 36 04:44:00 AM 251.1 144 395.1 05:39:00 AM 455.3 36.5 04:44:30 AM 224.2 143.8 368.0 05:39:30 AM 490.8 37 04:45:00 AM 203.5 143.6 347.1 05:40:00 AM 450.5 37.5 04:45:30 AM 207.1 04:45:30 AM 143.4 350.6 05:40:30 AM 423.2 - 38 04:46:00 AM 172.3 147 319.3 05:41:00 AM 412.1 38.5 04:46:30 AM 157.6 150.6 308.2 05:41:30 AM 391.6 39 04:47:00 AM 147.6 04:47:00 AM 154.2 301.7 05:42:00 AM 374.2 39.5 04:47:30 AM 138.7 04:47:30 AM 144.7 283.4 05:42:30 AM 352.2 40 04:48:00 AM 134.6 04:48:00 AM 143.9 278.6 05:43:00 AM 347.4 40.5 04:48:30 AM 125.5 04:48:30 AM 143.4 268.9 05:43:30 AM 342.6 41 04:49:00 AM 122.2 04:49:00 AM 145.4 267.6 05:44:00 AM 333.6 41.5 04:49:30 AM 117.5 04:49:30 AM 143.2 260.7 05:44:30 AM 329.2 - 42 04:50:00 AM 113.2 04:50:00 AM 143.9 257.1 05:45:00 AM 325.0 42.5 04:50:30 AM 111.8 04:50:30 AM 143.4 255.3 05:45:30 AM 316.8 43 04:51:00 AM 111.8 04:51:00 AM 143.0 254.8 05:46:00 AM 301.6 43.5 04:51:30 AM 142.2 05:46:30 AM 301.6 44 04:52:00 AM 106.4 04:52:00 AM 142.2 248.6 05:47:00 AM 301.6 44.5 05:47:30 AM 294.6 45 04:53:00 AM 106.4 04:53:00 AM 146.9 253.3 05:48:00 AM 289.2 45.5 05:48:30 AM 294.6 46 04:54:00 AM 105.4 04:54:00 AM 148.2 253.7 05:49:00 AM 301.6 46.5 05:49:30 AM 289.2 47 04:55:01)AM 104.2 04:55:00 AM 148.0 252.2 05:50:00 AM 287.8 47.5 05:50:30 AM 287.8 48 1)4:56:00 AM 106.2 04:56:00 AM 145.9 252.1 05:51:00 AM 287.2 -- 48.5 05:51:30 AM 287.8 49 04:57:00 AM 106.9 04:57:00 AM 144.7 251.6 05:52:00 AM 293.9 49.5 05:52:30 AM 300.2 50 04:58:00 AM 114.6 04:58:00 AM 144.7 259.3 05:53:00 AM 301.6 -- 50.5 05:53:30 AM 329.2 51 04:59:00 AM 109.2 04:59:00 AM 142.2 251.4 05:54:00 AM 325.0 51.5 05:54:30 AM 287.8 52 05:00:00 AM 1 1 1.8 05:00:00 AM 142.2 254.1 05:55:00 AM 287.8 52.5 05:55:30 AM 204.0 53 05:01:00 AM 111.8 05:01.00 AM 139.9 251.7 05:56:00 AM 188.7 53.505:56:30 AM 210.8 • 54 05:02:00 AM 123.8 05:02:00 AM 138.7 262.5 05:57:00 AM 2322 54.5 05:57:30 AM 263.7 55 05:03:00 AM 123.8 05:03:00 AM 139.2 263.0 05:58:30 AM 309.0 . 1AVLRA(,Ll 4:b-4:36 ( 183.34 4:13-4:36 II 149.0 I 334.3 I 3:10-3:31 II 367.3 N _ U d T U W 10 Cn ,J i- _ I> I _ U) IW _ (D � 12 Cn — I!- 11- 1_i 1J l> Z Im - — Ir Zo o 0 0 -f to co COcD 11= r co I< . Ij O I .5- Iii C7 rn rn UJ I co rn IZ W T N CO rW IO ! I I (� co i N r- O CO ) I Ch O) up.N OJ N to C`') v N to ^ Cn IW Co Co O) '- N CC) CO CO W W IW 1w IQ _ i 0co Z O Comiri'} to o o U) LLn to lcr0c5 4ui 446 It-— — oN rno tntno Rain ° .ttr) r � r IO iii ih co v v 4 iri 12 1 ct 1w ii a_ U tZ 0 co CO N a W co 1� ik lk N N I< m I = 4t * _ CO co U 2 2to O 2 _ = N j 2 J 2 2 O I cc 0 w cc w w cc w ¢ ¢ w< w O ~ < 12 cn Q L-1-.J W z w Lu Z z 0 I� u U ZUJ a U D0_ 0 ° cc u, 2 DO DO � � ,- OZ NOZ NOOZ u 0'`� z 0 T = z Z C" Q Mo a r- J Q 1 o w Z i� 11 co 0 0 cYt N CD w 8 W Q0 coo Li-- T 1 .T M � o0 La D J O Q `1-' o 0 >. CO Oz u.. Q oo .4- . WF c., L O J T Zz Tn O ,„. ,_ -a, W 0 o Z � O E c T w Q o a DW C) T W Tli\ e 20 M z T 0 00 T �;r ›- z 0 0 TtD QW O 0z z v, o 0 T wF zQ *, Z T c, w wCZ z a. z 0 0 T _-1 Y o .T 0 bt: www Li T _ co z 2 M W V) TIC T LI4 0 z cn 0 W U O c = C\J O c o � (l ` O = • W _ V • O d ti in m CC � oa� li ISc ' N N 0 d U 1 O col O � E TV O �- +� O I Z Q 0 (1) U kit CO 1 W 0 Cl. c W !--- D ._ o : I t SV% z t 7 ro s1 _ 4 v 1 a>c U CD r X LLJ II • _ I-- 0 Q - 0 x J x I-- 4 a — Q U) o Z o I— Cl) 0 - F— z V) O Z 0 0 ZQ n I- U U z 5 1 w J LI z W ', �, Q LA O w i--- CY o (� > Y. F- 0 �� LU ¢ o < c _ � D E O cnU' Z J j z = ir C 0 _J Li_ _._, ,_ 0 LA O r G V X C O U O N I Coco O Ift W in i r 4i*Iiiii-__ - ;I- / a rn -1' lit ■ V J D . _ i_. )f b-a u) -r- . 01 W $i- 0 cc _ co 00 COLLI1-tf.I- ■_ 4,_ in LI) W < f----VI-I- -CV = - CC Cc ■■ _ D -14T 'I-, IP o W CO 0 0 t ._._„, ,■ 2 E. __ 1in T NI zI 1 T 0 I■ (I) .:j iii+ ii 1 ■A ■ O N O CO CO d' N O CO CC) 'I' N - O O CO CO CO CO CO N- N. I- _ (Vide) a1VEJ MOld 0 - lr- II- 4 + + 0 (I) - I— J - U) + - in D W in _ C N d' w r _ I - -0 a _ 2 L11 < c - CC cc . 2 _•ems-, W o 0 co 0 s' ~ LL CV LL c\, - z -N = o fl II U I _ L1Jo U) _ O 0 0 0 O 1 I I 0 I I 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - h. CD In d-. CO . N r (vjdo) 21vJMo1d 0 1 ■ Lo � -tet -et i 0 _J +As e D 44+ I-IN V3 In w m s W < ++- - CC CC A-+ ii) Ln .=- 0-+#14,411 N t _ D 4-4.- w Lr) 0 _J LL co 4 z I-_______t______+.+, r II O • - o 0 _ w it ■ CID 1 1.0 - I I I I I 1 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0p in o in 0 . in o 10 o in o - (0 (0 to IC) 1- d- CO CO N N (v'ido) 21Vdl MOld L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L 0 r sE0 YYY REVISED 1`� MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SUBJECT: Nominations to Boards and Commissions DATE: January 4 , 1994 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Terms on various boards and commissions will be expiring on January 31, 1994 . According to council policy, it is appropriate to make nominations to boards and commissions at this time. Appointments will then be made at the next city council meeting. When there is more than one interested applicant for a particular opening, the interview committee will be interviewing the applicants, prior to the January 18th city council meeting. It has been past practice to nominate all applicants to the boards and/or commissions for which they have applied. The openings and applicants are as follows: 1] Planning Commission (2) Jane Dubois Terry Joos* Pat Dauenhauer Gary Morke 2] Energy and Transportation Committee (3) 3 ] Park and Recreation Advisory Board (2) Anne Seifert* Paulette Rislund* 4] Board of Review (5) Eldon Reinke* Richard Marks* Steve Clay* Councilor councilor 5] Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals Housing Advisory & Appeals Board (1) Gene Juergens* 6] Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (1) Gloria Vierling Terry Joos 7] Police Civil Service Commission (1) Stan Von Bokern* Gary Morke 8] Cable Communications Advisory Commission (1) Shakopee Community Access Corporation Board of Directors Larry Moonen* 9] Community Development Commission (2) Jon Albinson* Gary Morke Charles Brandmire* RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to make nominations to Boards and Commissions as follows: to Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment and Appeals, Jane Dubois, Terry Joos, Pat Dauenhauer, and Gary Morke; to Park and Recreation Advisory Board, Anne Seifert and Paulette Rislund; to Board of Review, Eldon Reinke, Steve Clay and Richard Marks; to Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals/Housing Advisory & Appeals Board, Gene Juergens; to Shakopee Public Utilities Commission, Gloria Vierling and Terry Joos; to Police Civil Service Commission, Stan Von Bokern and Gary Morke; to Community Development Commission, Jon Albinson, Gary Morke, and Charles Brandmire; to the Cable Communications Advisory Commission & Shakopee Community Access Corporation Board of Directors, Larry_ Moonen. * Indicates incumbents /5 Q, " OISENT MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SUBJECT: Nominations to Boards and Commissions DATE: December 30, 1993 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Terms on various boards and commissions will be expiring on January 31, 1994 . According to council policy, it is appropriate to make nominations to boards and commissions at this time. Appointments will then be made at the next city council meeting. When there is more than one interested applicant for a particular opening, the interview committee will be interviewing the applicants, prior to the January 18th city council meeting. It has been past practice to nominate all applicants to the boards and/or commissions for which they have applied. The openings and applicants are as follows: 1] Planning Commission (2) Jane Dubois Terry Joos* Pat Dauenhauer Gary Morke 2] Energy and Transportation Committee (3) 3] Park and Recreation Advisory Board (2) Anne Seifert* 4] Board of Review (5) Eldon Reinke* Richard Marks* Councilor councilor 5] Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals Housing Advisory & Appeals Board (1) Gene Juergens* 6] Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (1) Gloria Vierling Terry Joos 7] Police Civil Service Commission (1) Stan Von Bokern* Gary Morke 8] Cable Communications Advisory Commission (1) Shakopee Community Access Corporation Board of Directors 9] Community Development Commission (2) Jon Albinson* Gary Morke RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to make nominations to Boards and Commissions as follows: to Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment and Appeals, Jane Dubois, Terry Joos, Pat Dauenhauer, and Gary Morke; to Park and Recreation Advisory Board, Anne Seifert; to Board of Review, Eldon Reinke and Richard Marks; to Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals/Housing Advisory & Appeals Board, Gene Juergens; to Shakopee Public Utilities Commission, Gloria Vierling and Terry Joos; to Police Civil Service Commission, Stan Von Bokern and Gary Morke; to Community Development Commission, Jon Albinson and Gary Morke. * Indicates incumbents APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City Boards and/or Commissions. What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you must have an interest in serving your community. The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically have from one to two meetings per month, as follows: Planning Commission/Board of 1st Thursday 30after 1st Tuesday Adjustments and Appeals rs .m. Community Development Commission 3rd Wednesday at 5: 00 p.m. Energy & Transportation Committee 3rd Wednesday at 7: 00 p.m. Cable Communication Commission Quarterly o7r30ly spneeded on Mm. Housing Advisory and Appeal Board As Needed Building Code Board of Adjustment As Needed & Appeals Shakopee Public Utilities 1st Monday at 4 : 30 p.m. Commission Park & Recreation Advisory Board 4th Monday at 7 : 00 p.m. Police Civil Service Commission As Needed Community Youth Building 2nd Saturday of the month Committee at 9 : 00 a.m. Board of Review 7 : 00 p.m. 2 to 3 Tuesdays in May ri Name: nikal MO .K1` Address: lIUWZ 1v1�'i'r'+ < +� S Phone: (H) LR (B) ceLiU -1 W7 How long have you been a resident of Shakopee? / S �z� 5 + Occupation: Does your work require you to travel? (check one) A great deal Periodically Very little SNot at all C��' Do you have any special interests or training which you feel a particular board or commission could use? (Use separate sheet if necessary) .-c>&.) i "rpo'rc-sAk t ry Cow.r,&L t Al • Board or Commission in which you are interested? Pc l :eP C i u < < Sc,,-,cc. l b 6...w`.....v•-•1C/c1 D2 u'et v c)OA t `R N N 1 K-'9 Please statebriefly why you are interested in serving on this Board/Commission for which you are submitting an application: Vkp \ Z o Q E /rV o 0 L. u C-'t7 t� i T H o Lg. Y C CD.VA.ut*t u l t6v -y hn-) n r=-eeL- TN vi i t eOu�t- lam MAK #2 c. t'>os 1 - iv/ Q. eo,0 - L ; 000 Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any activity, recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or indirect. In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable interest in any business, however organized, which could be constructed as a conflict of interest? Yes No >4-- . If yes, please provide the details on a separate sheet of paper. Please list three references (Name, Address and Phone) : 1.-To LAA. \- -Q w P ( 774-57-oit d,205-5 cJ I�ec c 2 . k.Q%I-4Ni LO O 4/96 -/2 /Z 3 . ___-- _ •VCV0 7.4 2 Dick /Vc�2vS7, —4-4' evI ,- r ,c E pc-1,-c,-ix,A..1 I here// certify that he facts within the foregoing application / ar ue . .".i, c• -ct i � � ' o the best of my knowledge. G 1 Signature RETURN APPLICATION AND / r:3-- 2____ PLEDGE TO: Date City Clerk City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue " " Shakopee, MN 55379 445-3650 DATE RECEIVED: AND/OR COMMISSIONS APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL CityDofSORY ShakopeeDS AND/ 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City Boards and/or Commissions. What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards and Commissions? You must be a resident resolution, e, except t where non residency is permitted by community. importantly, you must have an interest in serving your The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically have from one to two meetings per month, as follows: 1st Thursday after 1st Planning Commission/Board of Tuesday at 7 : 30 p.m. Adjustments and Appeals Community Development Commission 3rd Wednesday at 5:00 p.m. Energy & Transportation Committee 3rdWednesday at 7 : 00 P • Cable Communication Commission Quarterly or as needed on Monday at 7 : 30 p.m. Housing Advisory and Appeal Board As Needed Building Code Board of Adjustment As Needed & Appeals Shakopee Public Utilities 1st Monday at 4 : 30 p.m. Commission Park & Recreation Advisory Board 4th Monday at 7 : 00 p.m. Police Civil Service Commission As Needed h c--- . • • . . :. . ::g a- = - - - 7 : 00 p.m. 2 to 3 Tuesdays Board of Review in May P^` cc ,� ,���&* Address: Name• � Phone: (H) ` � 5 - �2(i7 � How long have you been a resident of Shakopee? Occupation: Does your work require you to travel? (check one) Y' ver little Not at all A great deal Periodically Y • r Do you have any special interests or training which you feel a particular board or commission could use?, (Use separate sheet if necessary) S S2V6,o c/A) 1-PF- CL1u,ec.f+ PAi,s N Co,v jicr l 41s/ yr F-W-r2 S ,r Board or Commission in which you are interested? PIA-NiviN§ CCe'n vl-, kz Please state briefly why you are interested in serving on this Board/Commission for which you are submitting an application: S It a c jLa:- /S 4 £ 2.t.a± G,/cZ o r/l.5 Cr /9 AD Gtid ]/3 l,/G• 7? S�t j�- c)FFiS/L A5 : ac.4 4'- j2'S/gL )t f/ I?F Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any activity, recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or indirect. In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable interest in any business, however organized, which could be constructed as a conflict of interest? Yes No X . If yes, please provide the details on a separate sheet of paper. Please list three references (Name, Address and � Phone) : 1. _Tctr VC(�P7/N 5,� 7 NQy7��LnL Ni cr Cf 1cCr'1 4 'e - 3 jU L 0,60 , 2 . &U> r� 05. C, C .lye. -st�✓C/c/rt5c SYS- '2i, 3 . C6-72ai }11 30 f, - X095/ Qic; I hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. ///Cct 6.eAA:t i.11�li Signature RETURN APPLICATION AND PLEDGE TO: /1- ,;-7 (73 Date City Clerk City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 445-3650 tom. r::- DATE -.DATE RECEIVED: DEC 2r! APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City Boards and/or Commissions. What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you must have an interest in serving your community. The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically have from one to two meetings per month, as follows: Planning Commission/Board of 1st Thursday after 1st Adjustments and Appeals Tuesday at 7 : 30 p.m. Community Development Commission 3rd Wednesday at 5: 00 p.m. Energy & Transportation Committee 3rd Wednesday at 7: 00 p.m. Cable Communication Commission Quarterly or as needed on Monday at 7 : 30 p.m. Housing Advisory and Appeal Board As Needed Building Code Board of Adjustment As Needed & Appeals Shakopee Public Utilities 1st Monday at 4 :30 p.m. Commission Park & Recreation Advisory Board 4th Monday at 7: 00 p.m. Police Civil Service Commission As Needed Community Youth Building 2nd Saturday of the month Committee at 9 : 00 a.m. Board of Review 7: 00 p.m. 2 to 3 Tuesdays in May Name• TTrJt. P . )// Address: ii U- , Phone: (H) 6/4/7 %i:5 (B) � G4' How long have you been a resident of Shakopee? Occupation: )cog 4J%U,(' Does your work require you to travel? (check one) A great deal Periodically Very little `"/Not at all Do you have any special interests or training which you feel a particular board or commission could use? (Use separate sheet if necessary) g5EE 47774C24E A Board or Commission in which you are interested? i°44/.4U/A10 - 60//,//5S/(M.V%Df�, 6 D` /M /lf:7T/1EX)i:SAO) /i/* gLS Please state briefly why you are interested in serving on this Board/Commission for which you are submitting an application: PEEL , Lf} we b / o1Qz E L y t,eaaiTft (S Cid iT/C!fL 1v �c� 3 %U L 4 ?S . /fI L'/Cc J� //� .�:i 5 • /oma 1,Ad rJ • FAL -"WE- hm).s OF 70,6- ,44,0 iNG CP/1107. k)/L SA=E 2�Ac? 'iV& E-PPECTS P& Ve--44s ce-4C Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any activity, recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or indirect. In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable interest in any business, however organized, yhich could be constructed as a conflict of interest? Yes No . - If yes, please provide the details on a separate sheet of paper. Please list three references (Name, Address and Phone) : 1. ieici,Ln,eb 7-, /ZIUkeED/11 I i e & ob DUe,E T�. 57/7¢,'o9,' W4-4.3 7 2 .A5, /Me/ 5.0. ✓llS#AI-XMc 4a/S�4444/ 3 . fl 4. imt.K /400-4-4 S/�A/C d �c��1� 414/S-"--- I 14/s" I hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature r RETURN APPLICATION AND PLEDGE TO: //`i k Dat�e City Clerk City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue • Shakopee, MN 55379 445-3650 DATE RECEIVED: /J TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator r,,T, FROM: Vernice Takumi, Accountant RE: Interfund Transfers \\, DATE: December 20, 1993 Introduction Council approval of equipment fund transfers for 1993 is requested. Background Transfer from the Capital Equipment Fund to the General Fond for the purchase of the following items: Police Squad Farmington Ford 12,815.00 Deputy Registrar 5.50 Streicher's 1,705.33 Grafix Shoppe 282.23 Gas Supply Inc. 1,795.72 Squad Superior Ford 13,484.00 Deputy Registrar 5.50 State of Minn. 350.00 Grafix Shoppe 282.23 Gas Supply Inc. 2,390.00 Unmarked Grossman Chev. 14,884.00 Deputy Registrar 987.96 Comm Auditors Equip. 167.27 Grossman Chev. 100.00 Fire Mobile Radios Communication Auditors 3,825.48 Rescue Tools Smeal Fire Equipment 4,020.38 Boat Great American Marine 8,244.00 Deputy Registrar 74.44 Street Alley Grader Lano Equipment 50,295.16 Dump Truck Northstar Intrnt'1 Inc. 46,882.00 Crysteel Dist Inc 20,329.44 Deputy Registrar 3,067.83 Various for Parts 529.31 Shop Card Sys. Westside Equip. 24,624.95 Scope Snap-On Tools Corp. 18,007.00 Park Muck Thane Hawkins Polar Chev. 14,183.00 Carb & Turbo Sy Inc. 725.21 Various for Parts 842.41 Midland Equip. 9,105.75 Deputy Registrar 942.40 Mower MIT Dist Co. 35,022.52 MTI Dist Co. 341.87 Total 290,317.89 Action Requested Transfer from the Capital Equipment Fund to the General Fund $290,317.89 for the purchase of equipment in 1993. /Sca, r,,Or'srn7'1T 'r TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Bids For Full Size Squad Car DATE: December 9, 1993 Introduction The 1994 budget contains an appropriation for the purchase of a squad car. Background The 1994 budget includes an appropriation of $16,500 for the purchase of a squad car. Funding is from the Capital Equipment Fund. The Hennepin County purchasing cooperative did not bid full size squads this year but instead is buying off the state contract. The new car will replace a 1990 model. The final cost of the new car will exceed the budgeted amount due to the cost of the extended warranty, increased vehicle cost, modifications in equipment for dual air bags and the increased cost for the propane conversion. Many of the items for the propane fuel that are removed from the old car can not be used on the new car because of model differences. The budget difference could run as much as $2,500 and can be covered by a budget amendment later. Council will recall that the 1994 budget was prepared early in 1993. This resulted in putting together 1994 numbers before the cost of the 1993 conversions were known. The bid for the full size car is as follows; Base bid $13,889.00 Options: Map light 34.00 Deck lid lights 95.00 Extended Warranty 590.00 Shop manual 90.00 Total 14,408.00 Alternatives 1. Buy as per above. 2. Buy as per above but modify options. 3. Rebid on our own. 4. Don't buy a full size squad. Recommendation Alternative number 1. Action Move to authorize the purchase of a full size police squad from Superior Ford in the amount of $14,708.00 plus delivery in accordance with the state contract. 15.k/ C];(X " 7- 7:MT TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Purchase of 1994 Compact Pickup DATE: December 9, 1993 Introduction The 1994 budget contains $13,000 for the purchase of a compact pickup for the Engineering Division. Background The 1994 budget contains $13,000 for a compact pickup. Funds are allocated in the Capital Equipment Fund for this purchase. The Hennepin County Purchasing Co-operative contract for the compact pickup has been awarded to Polar Chevrolet. The cost is as follows: Base bid $8,356.00 Options; Air Conditioning 648.00 Radio AM/FM 100.00 Service manual 20.00 Total 9,124.00 Alternatives 1. Buy unit as per above. 2. Modify options. 3. Rebid unit on our own. 4. Do not buy truck this year. Recommendation Alternative number 1. The cut off to place an order under the Hennepin County contract is January 14, 1994. Action Requested Move to authorize the purchase of a compact pickup from Polar Chevrolet in the amount of $9,124.00 under the Hennepin County Cooperative contract. 157,1 T0: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Bids For Surburban (Fire Dept) DATE: December 9, 1993 Introduction The 1994 budget contains an appropriation for the purchase of a surburban for the Fire Chief. Background The 1994 budget includes an appropriation of $28,000 for the purchase of a surburban. The Hennepin County purchasing cooperative contract bid for the surburban and the options requested by the Fire Department is as follows; Base bid $19,476.00 Options; Dual spotlight 248.00 4x4 1,855.00 Power locks 322.00 Power windows 400.00 Dark tinted windows 250.00 Tilt steering 135.00 Cruise control 180.00 Towing package 175.00 H.D. Alternator 75.00 Total 23,116.00 Alternatives 1. Buy as per above. 2. Buy as per above but modify options. 3. Rebid on our own. 4. Don't buy a surburban. Recommendation Alternative number 1. Action Move to authorize the purchase of a surburban from Polar Chevrolet in the amount of $23,116.00 in accordance with the Hennepin County Cooperative contract. CO1\13EIT TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Purchase of Computer Bridge DA1'h: December 16, 1993 Introduction Council authorization to place an order for a computer bridge is requested. Background A computer bridge is a communications device to connect city hall to the LOGIS computer consortium. The purchase has been recommended by the computer committee and funding is from the Capital Equipment Fund in the 1994 budget in the total estimated amount of $9,500. The bridge will replace the MUX which is obsolete, slower and less reliable. When the bridge is installed, Shakopee will be on a wide area network with LOGIS. Shakopee is the second to last LOG'S city to upgrade to a bridge. The purchase would be through LOGIS. Alternatives 1. Deny the request. 2. Approve the request. Recommendation Alternative number 2. Action Requested Move to authorize the purchase and installation of a computer bridge in the estimated amount of $9,500. jsVc Attached is a print out showing the division budget status as of 12/29/93 for 1993 based on data entered as of that date. There appears to be a few divisions running close to their budget and General Government Buildings will go over budget. 12/29/93 CITY OF SHAKOPEE EXPENSES BY DEPARTMENT CURRENT YEAR ANNUAL MONTH TO PERCENT DEPT DEPT NAME BUDGET ACTUAL DATE EXPENDED 11 MAYOR & COUNCIL 69,140 4,838 55,650 80 12 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 198,110 19,144 185,981 94 13 CITY CLERK 114,510 7,226 106,618 93 15 FINANCE 273,520 17,104 237,209 87 16 LEGAL COUNSEL 158,120 10,295 140,815 _ 89 17 PLANNING 376,940 15,814 290,467 77 18 GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 119,426 20,074 119,162 100 31 POLICE 1,432,630 94,190 1,302,405 91 32 FIRE 255,820 7,429 226,620 89 33 INSPECTION-BLDG-PLMBG-HTG 165,804 10,649 141,045 85 41 ENGINEERING 342,720 20,614 268,213 78 42 STREET MAINTENANCE 688,710 47,308 547,227 79 44 SHOP 149,420 10,127 121,740 81 46 PARK MAINTENANCE 318,770 13,966 279,854 88 48 REFUSE COLLECTION 521,389 42,580 464,126 89 61 POOL 150,300 2,457 143,030 95 64 RECREATION 214,011 15,894 185,221 87 91 UNALLOCATED 1,142,645 205 504,301 44 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 6,691,985 359,914 5,319,684 79 17 PLANNING 360,860 23,744 302,919 84 TOTAL TRANSIT 360,860 23,744 302,919 84 12 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 64,870 3,712 47,732 74 TOTAL HRA 64,870 3,712 47,732 44 00 N/A 339,400 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPITAL EQUIP REVOLVING FUND 339,400 0 0 0 C) n 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o o x 0 .A w w ' 43 '. w w VD0Z • _ ° ) --..i ---iON as x n CTCT CSN 00 OO OO\ CT OCT O. H oI O. Ln .D CO -C. W N H ZZ r n H H H H H H H H H H H r H H < H H H H H H n x .D .O .O .D .O .o .O .D .o .D .D •D .D •D 0 .D .o .O .D .0 .O Cl C) .D .o .O .O .O .0 .O .D .D .O •D .O .D .o H .o .O .D .D .D .O CTl c) .0 1, .- .- 1, 4, 4, 4, 4- 4, .- 4, W W 0 W W Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) 0 7C \\\\\\\\\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H H H H H H H A HHHHHHHHH H H H N N NN N N N N 0 CI \\\\\\\\\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N) N N N N ►-3 H HHHHHHHHH H H H NO .D NN 0 0 0 0 CT) Ci) '3 CI n 7d x •CO to rt) <I) -CO <I) v) v+ v+ C) '-3 H H H H H H -Cl) .N -CO </) -Cl) {/) -Cl) t/) .. - - - - 'Cl) H N </)'Cl)'Cl)N 'Cl)'Cl) N) N H . 4- N Cl) 0 0 O. O. .D .D Cp Oo a A v CO CO .0 co � co O. �) .O A 4- N W O. O. CO CO W Cl) O. CT M e W - -4 v Cl) �! �! (r) �l N 0 N -) �) {/) {A -Cl) -Cl) H CO 0 0 CO CO Cl) Cl) N N 0 0 Q. Q. Cl) Cl) Q. Q. Cl) O. Cl) In . r Cl) Cl) 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 F 4, 0 0 0 0 2 Cl) C' .0 - 4 - .� �, -Ps .D .C- v+ 00 00 00 0 .r` 00 � v+ 00 I-' H Cl)o H aaaaaaaaa CM C IV � Po H o N Cl) Cl) Cl) C/) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) siZo cn cn cn cn rn v) C/) C/) C/) tri rT) r 'e Cx) Ch voi H 000000000 :� 7d '� r e, H Cl) 1-4 nnnnnnnnn 00 H P PO Cl) CTl n Cn ZMMZM1 t as a - C) 0> .-3 0 txi O to CCT7 0 CT) CTl tx1) ril) CT) CT) ril) CT) CT) z Z Z ' O Z z c,' n n n n n n n n n H 0 r CO r acxxxxxxxx roro H 0 tr32 H to 0 N C70C) C) C70nno as r H 2 a r 2 0 'T) )O •• 000000000 C/1 C/) CT) 2 r 0 H H H ZZZZZZZZZ 'b r' Cl) > Cl) P-3 C/) H -31-3 )-31-3 -31-3P-31-3 H H 'Z 'ro :O 'ro :V 'A :V '� 7y C) C) H a 0 PV It H It H H H H H H H H H 0 7C 2ZZZZZZZZ 0 r N c )c) nc) c) 00c) c) z 0 Pt) n Cn '71 r7 r W Cd Co Cc) rA Co O' W W O O Pt 9 y --n H ITS H CTl H HHHHHHHHH o o o o ro ro 0 ,.< P.< 0 � o rrorl O ro � H• HHHHHHHH H H H 1-3 H Cl)C0 0r I a H 2 H 2 C7 z Z z Z z Z z z Z H H Cr) r > z Cl) Cf) Cl) CC/) nc) nc) c� c) nnc) 00 Ho n V V V V V V V V V Cl) i) 2 rEn r CleV ,1:1 'b) a a a H H H H H H H H H H 0 0 r ,-C I.0 ZZZZZZZZZ ro ro a 1O b > > 9 H HHHHHHHHH C%' r [CT) o r' H H 7' 1-.4 n cr--7 rTl z n x C=7 C/) CTl H x Cr) V) V) H n CT1 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .D . .D .D .D 0 •D .O .O . D a O. H H C.) W A H H H 4, 4, Cl) •D `D co Co O` Co co Co , 0 N Cb C)O N H N 0O CO 00 N H N .D .D H H � H 4, O , O CO H H H H H .0 C,) N H H N 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 11 1 I I I c .0 4- 4, - A 4, i A 4- .C- A A l- N N A N N N , Z N N N N N N N N) N N N Cl) .L H H N H N H , H Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl Cl) H H H W W CO v H v 0 v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl) Cl) 0 CT 0 Cr. # 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 2 1-4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r . r � .r` r4, ,� r rr w H H H H H H H w wwwC+3Cr) C) 4) Cl) 4, t,..) Cl) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HHHHHHHHH H 0 0 co v O. Cl' w n 0 hn H ro 0 z a Cl o0 CD z 0 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H '-'3 `3 H,,, H H > ,-11 'V .11 ..c1 ro 0-0 011 ro ~ .11 "b .-c, X X X' X 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o x o Zs Zs Zs 4s Zs - is Zs Zs Zs 0 Z 0 0 ON 0 as a\ O. O\ O. rn o% O\ x 0 .O .a .a .a CO 0) 00 H 0) V O. A W N r 0 .a 03 V Z r 0 r r r rr rrr r r 0 %.0 .0 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 r r r r .O .D .O .O w .a .D .0 .O .tea .a te � .a .° X 4, 4, Ill 0 Zs -s Zs Zs r Zs r r r 4, 0 77 \0 \ \ \\ \\\ \ \ \ 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0Pci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ F-. H H r r H H H H 0 0 0 0 H H H H H H H CTI tn H • til 0 :V N N W W NN NN Cxi)) rr rr NN F-. I--. 0 H N N .. .. H H A Zs x N N N N N 4. A O. O. W W N N r a• .O O 4 0) 03 .a .0 r r V -4 r r 0 0 (..n 0) CO 00 0) 0' O. O\ O. .a N 4, 0 V Na N O. a. to to 0 0 4- A 0 0 N 0 /CD N N 0 0 0 0 N to rn .a V .a w 03 CO N N CO 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Z • to to 0 0 0 O r O. to O. r 0 to O. a. 0 o V+ to 0 0 A A O 0 -O. 1-3 LI) * * * * * * * * * * * * 0 0 00 0 C) C) C0 n 0 W 0z w CO to H 'b r-' tt "0v it$ .07:1HH .�C H x V) w FC t _' HHH 20 z 9 to z 0 'iy Cr) E0 CZ) 0 .� H ti H H H 0 00 � <ril 03 •• `d Z 0 0 H x - C7 t7 Z x h:1H 0 N H V) C) 7C 0 9 tri? r Z 0 73 1-3 0 d r H 0 H Iii H H H H o r z r t=1 ro H CT113 I ,0o PJ o C H H 0 CO til ro 0 r r a H C CO H ro tri H 7C1 "i) til trl H Z H (/) r ....3 Cl) "C H ~v C) :� CO O C7 H CO V) 0 0 tx, Z t H a \ C11 H Z CO CZ) CO7 H ttx1 tZ•) H\ H H vr) Cr, tri CZ) C) 0 z z Cl) H a g 00 V) H to H C to r > b7 > z H V) H 'rod Cr) ZHZ H '.rod H H HH COCr: H H 0 CO < Z H Z C z V) a z > r CO H n 0 Z 0 Z H CO 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a r .a H H 4, r V w r cm r N r r N.) O. r to O. N.) N) W H 03 0 F. .0 r r r r r H r V H H H w 0 I 1 I I I 1 I I I II I I C r r r r4, .r` rr w ton 4:5 r Z H w H N N N W N A N N N H to wrr w 0 0 0 r r 0 0 0 VI LP 0 0 O 0 It 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 til 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 tr 0 0 0 O 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t,.) 0 0 00 Z A 4- 1 r a. 4- 0 a C .r` A w w w w w w to LI) t,, t,, W w 0 H 0 CO .a .a V V V to O. to 4- W N H r C) CO CO ro 0 z C "C CO z CD H HH H H H H u H H H C N "C "0 "0 '0 "0 "C '7. H H H 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 r 4, -N r r r r r r r 4- r r to c r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0 Z "i "i v "4 "4 -4 -4 - ON 7C 0 H H o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •0 H H o .0 03 -4 O. In A w N H O •0 ZO r 0 H r H H H H r H H H H H H 0 x v3 .o .0 V) '0 VD .0 .o x .O .O .0 .0 •0 .D .0 .O .0 .O .0 'O .O til C) r 4- r r .r` r � r r r r .� � 0 7C \ \ x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PV H H H H H H H H r H H H H C7 tTi P,' 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H H H H r H r H H H H H H H tii U) txi o 7c X tri -ch <0 NN NV) NN C) H NN D-' I--. F" F-' NN 7C <a V) V)N - - V) V) <I)V) VD N - - - - - - r r V) V) -VD V) r r w w 1� 4, w w r r V) V) .0 .D N N '0 '0 V)V) F" F-• NN F-' F-. NN V+ In FP I--' -i v NN F-. I-' 4, 4, .O .o v v 0 -4 -4 N N .P .A V+ VI r r co to 0 0 .O .0 0 0 V+ VI .A � 0 0 0 OD A O' C, 0 0 '0 '0 0) 07 w w •O .0 0'• O' O 0 .0 .0 00 00 O 0 O 0 O 0 2 0 0 0 0 ( Vt V+ L7' ON O` w w . 'D 'O A 4, V+ 0 0 N N 0=0 '-3 w0 * * * * * * * * * * * * F" x x x x x x x 0 0 rn VI 0 C) 0 FC t0� P a z a H [CTI w Z cn ro H H co - W Cn 0O H a 2 cn 0 H CO H z y Co < 0 HH H 0 H t• 0 �cc� O t-' O C) r r `2 z 2 Po H 0 t•v t1 < Z P> Z C) 0 Cl) H r VI H 0 0O 0 75 r 2 z a PC, z H C) H H 2 2 0 o z ti) 0 VI ro3 y 0 broro PJ PC ,-0 trio CT7 o CTi tTi tri 0 tx) 0 C 'T1 '=7 t tc�7 trn-' 1-3 N 1-3 f-3 y r 0 H V) 0 2 v) H Cl) z H H H Z Cn H to C) C o C C) 0 C) C) 0 Ex o 7z)to En a U) v)a to to N cn tTl a H H t' H c t" c C c H 'U C) r �-i P-0 H V) H b cn ro b b H a tT7 N H rh 0 t 0 H 2 'id z H 'id H z a C CC H) H 0 tT7 C txi CI [T7 0 03 H cn tTi H CI V1 to to to CI CrT7 O 0 C) 0 txi Cx) O o 0 o O` O' O• 0 O 0 '0 '0 0 a L.) .t` r 4, N O. N rn H A 00 o H 0 �! N A 0 H r O' NH H rr 0 r r r 1-• N N N r r r 0 r 1 I I I I I I I I IN I Z • 4.- A 4, .P .A 4, 4:- 4, H w H N w co w N co N N N w 1-• lT r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4k 0 0 .L" 0 0 r 0 r 0 0 r N N 0 0 r 0 ON ON 0 0 0 0 0 00 H D r 0 0 0 0 • 0 w 0 0 0 w •O C 4, r 0 .t -...Ir r A 0 r v, r .� r 0 r r r r 00 .0 0 -4 V+ O' 0 -4 v+ O' .� w I-I C) 4, tin r 4, ro 0 z g ro C.) cro m 2 U: H H H H ,Hd ,Hd t> H H H H H H H - 11:1P-10 'V 'V ro 1-0 'V 'V ,TJ '11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 C) 0 r 4' r r r r r r r r Si C r r r r r r 4, r r 0 Z V - V V V V - V V V x C) N N H H H H H H H H H H 0 .D 00 V O. In 4, W N Z r O C) H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H C) x .0 .D .o .O .O .O .D .D .D .O .O .D .O .D .D .O .O x Cn .O .O .O .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .0 .D .D .O .O .D .D til C) r 4, r r r r 4, r r r 4, r 4, 4, r r 0 x \\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ 71 CD 0 000000 o O O o O o 00 0 70 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H C7 til -SSS \ \ \ \� \ 9 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O F-] H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H til Cl) H til 0 PO PC Ill <A <A -CO <A H H <A 0 H 1 H N N '.O A In x <A - -CO <J>-co to - -Co -CO -co - - </) </) - - -co to 0 N N ., H OD O. CO W V) <A H H W W <A </) W W .O V H V+ V+ P. Vi Cl)<A N H N Na .D V+ 0 -CO -CO In V+ O O CT CT V V H H .P 4' .D A 4' Z C7 O CD O+ N 4, V+ .O W O CO .D .O CO CO O O O 0 w w V ,4 H Na CO O O O tD C n O W W H V U . V+ O. H F CO CO N N In In W W V V W .D A CO Co Z O Co Co Co 4, O. V O. 0. 4- O. rn 0 O V+ V+ V V Co CO 0 0 w O w 0 0' H to * * * * * * * * * * 0 O H H H H HH H C=1 C) H H tray V V V N sti 70 Z ZZZZ z Z H .0 H Z C C CC CC 0 to Z ZZZZ z z 70 C H 7C til ;n ;v ;i M PI til Ell Ill III til Dl til 0 1--I r ,..3 o 99x999 to �' rco- 0 z til H Cr 0 H H H c> < o a 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 H Z - 9 Z co to Z to Ill t' to C) rG C7 rG H O F-) 1-3 to11 b PC VI 70 GI GI N I-. Z R5 hi o F. 0 rrt r .< 0 x 'zi H z C) 'iy b Cl C C C C C O H t=1 t=1 C) H H b H 70 H H H H H H b .0 .0 0 X z 70 Cil O H H H H H H til 9 R7 H H H H H H C H H 0 0 0 0 rpiy L., to H Hp3H H H H r X M '� C) CpC IA a V) rG K 't r< rC rC H \ [II til '=y x MI t=7 Cn [II C H to Cn til to to to C) C Z rz-3 toil 70 Ili Cr,C0 0 i5 NN Cr)0 'z-3 H Z H Cil Z Ill til C- til til til MI ''3 tZ a'' C C C C C C Cl) H Cn N r • y H H H H H H 'Ll to H H Q+ ,-0 'il to C) C) C) C) 0 C) 'v r-3 Z Z 9 to H ro C rn t=1 . til til til r t+l H H r 'C t O rCT) C)) Z Z Co CO C z H to til 9 9 77 r H C) Z Z H C) C) rn 0 C) C) hl .O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 .O .O O , 9 w 4, W H W H CT H O. A CT H 00 V 1' W C) Na H H CO Na Na CO N to .A r H Na H H Na F. H H CO U' 0 O N H H H H H w 0 0 H H p 0 i I i , i , , i i i i C 4- 1, .t' 4- 4 4, 4, 4, r 4 A A 4- Na H A r Z CT W W W W W W W N W N Na N Na O. Vt W r 1-3 N H Co Co CO CO CO CO H w 4, 4- Na H CO w H O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N 0 O 0 0 4* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 .D .D 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .O .D 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 W W 0 Naw 0 0 0 Z 4, A 4' A A 4, 4- A V F. 1' 4 4 C Ln V+ V+ V+ U' V+ V+ V+ V+ V+ V+ V 4- 4- 1 • 0 O. 4- W CJ W W W W Na H 0 .D .D CO H C) til hi 0 z C C.-:- CC-:-. z H H H H H H H H H H H H 0 r H H H H I-0 b hi ~c -.7: hib 'n hi hi hi 'e hiry 'c hc 9 r • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 r r r r r r r r r . ' Cil C r r r r r r r r r r 0 Z v v v J V J v v v v x' 0 L,,) w N N N N N N N N.) H r 0 •0 CO J O. VI r w N ZZ r 0 rrrrrr rrr r r r r r-. rr r r 0 x .o .0 .D .D '0 .0 .O 'D .D 'D .0 •D '0 '0 'D •0 '0 '0 Z Cil .o .D '0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .o '0 '0 .0 .o .C) Ci) 0 ✓ rrrrr r -Ps r r r r r r -4' -4" r r CD N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .v ✓ rrrrr rrr r r r r r rr r r C7 Ci) \\\\\\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H rrrrrr rrr r r r r r ?-• l•-• r r Cil H Cxi 0 x VI N N tq t/) t/) <I) t/)<I) <I) <I) 0 0-3 H F. U) w r 1 ' H H to • to -COto- to to v) t/) tp - N tp r w w H H 0.. v)v) W W 10 r r to to w w N v) r to v) r N w O. w r 0D Oo V+ VI 0 0 r H H H .0 1/40 .0 w w .0 '0 V+ Z C7 ✓ NNv 0 N OD0 -) H V1 V+ t-. I--. 00 UI V+ H H Cv .ow V+ VI 01/4 a% 0 0 n In H 0 r 01/4 N 0) 0 00 0 w w r r 0 0 00 0o v v •0 r r 0 0 0 0 0 Z O."0 r N 0 w 0 0 0 0 N N CO OD 0 0 V+ Vt 0 0 w .0 r O' O. 0 0 -0 H w0 * * * * * * * Y+ H C U) U) U) n1 ;h :hPO .b ro 'O ro 0 00ZZn 0 � VI Vha w r i Zk HH rorororororo tz1 [xi txl ro N N mi � "h < 0 Cr1CrlCItil cx3cxl rrr U) M Cil Cil [if Cil Cil Cil 0 0 0 Z V) H 7 O O Crl) Z •- '-3 H H C7 f/) = 0 C ti) V) 0 O UU) C) x N HHHHHH H H H U/) 0 d 0 � 0 n cHH P.< 1• 4 ►C 1-4 rC P.< PI VI H H U 114JN f/ ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 f�7 ')h 'xi ')h '�i 'r1 0 0 0 0 O O O MI CO CO 0 rd J-3CO y 0 0 rorororororo CCC 'zf .0 %C 1-3 Cil Ci) Cif Cif Ci) Cif H H H Ci) C O H Cii O H 0 C7 C 0 H ro U) U) dpi H r P> '11H H HHH H H H H H H r H H M '-3 0 CCI H H H H H H Z 'Z Z H CT) V) \ Z H CrJ 'C 9 fn ZZZZZZ 0 0 0 Z Z H C/) 0 Z Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 '-3 Cl) Com') CZI ) N • 0 tr '� Cr) H H H V1 C/) O C/) V) CC/) 0 Z 35 H Z C CCC C C H H H C r' H '-0 Z ''d H 'T) H 'V ro ro b ro ro y y r Cr) -3 y ro 0 0 rrrrrr Cti1 Z H a z H H H H H HPC1 0) Cil Ci) Cif Ci) C-7 Cif V H C0i1 V Cr'7 V) V) V) Cn V) V) Cr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ON .0 O 0 0 0' 0 .0 0> .0r4LHH rwr r h) r r H H N r Oo 0 r VI r r' O. '0 m r r N) H N h) CO 01 H v r0 0 H H H H H H N H r H N 0 H H H N 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ✓ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N Z N N N N N N N N N Com) Vt w W C.) N LID w N '-3 ✓ rrrrr www H til H w w HV1 CO 0H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 V' 0 r rrr r r 0 0 r H 0' 0' m vi UI as v, r Cr. Cr. O. O. O\ O. O. Q\ 0\ H CJ H 0 '0 CO W v H r r r r r r w w w 0 Cif My 0 z g • '0 Cs C) z C v+ H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H ..0 r '0 d 'Oro rororo IV ha )-0 't7 'v 'a 'c 'v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O x 0 2, r r r r r r r .1, 4, tx3 a r . r 4- r r 4- 4- r r C) z V V V V V V V V V V x C) A w w w w w w w ta H F-' 0 .o C) V a. V+ � w N Z t-' 0 C) I- r H H r H H H H H H H H H H H H H 0 x .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .o .O .O x tri .o .o .o .O .O .O .O .O .o .o .D .0 .D .O .o .o .O .o Cr7 C) 4, 4' r 4- r r 4, 4, r4- r r r .r` rrrr` 0 N �� - - �.......�- - - ��.� x 0 0 00 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0000 po H H H H r HHHH HH H H HHHH C7 Cr' �� - ���� � -S '��� a C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H H r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r ri Co H C7 0 z, M <A N <n <n H <nv> 0 H H N W a0 o 4. - x <n v> <n-co -Cl) -c) <n v) «> <n <n N H H H H <n N <n <n <n V U+ O. N W N N H r V+ V+ 0 0 V) <n CO H H CT N W 0) CO CO CO U+ CO H H CA r r W Ca r r N N CT <I) H <I) X 0 W a% O. W .O r 0 0 W W W ON r r a' W W V7 V7 Cr, O. 0 0 W -Cl) W N .O 0 CD L.) 0 0 V (Ti H Cn a. as a. V w r r w w .O N 0) 0 Ln 0 0 0 0 O N U' Z n Ca' 00 H VI O. NN -P• 4, CO V W H V 00 00 H CO CO roar W-Ui H (....3 * * * * * * * * * O H C C Cn fn Cl) Cl) En V) V) Cn Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) CnCn V) V) .O Z C C H H "11 hi '11 1110 0 Z M x .o 0 `� `� H Z ZZZZ x 0-3 x '� a hi H 0 O C) C7 O [ ' 'V IV 'V '13O x z Co v) cn tri Eli Z 'r7 tri C' Cr1 Irl < 0 Cl) Cl) tri Cr' Cr' 0 H H H H Cl) Cl) H Cr1 Cr1 Cr' Cr' Cr' OD H PV X 7:1 Cr' Ill Cr' Cr1 Crl H H H :h - - - - Z z HH •cn � dcidv 0 Cr' r7 w - cn t• Cl) a s HHHH C: C O Cr) HHHH ,) N M CH Hr7 00 0000 C HZZ N p H H H H H H Py x .t >C .G >C H P3o 0 n 0 Z H ro Cl) H a z a 0 C-' 0 ro M C11 0 '-3 ro ro "ID ro ro ro 0 CI iv cn 0 0 Cri C/) H C; CII a 0 0 0 0 H 0 Cror) C COn Cron' C11:1 r1 tri IA a :aro a' 'T1 171 [r' m [r7 Z [xi H ro 1-3 H a > a H 0 Z H C'' N V) N Ch H Cl) H Z 0 a H H 0 H Cr' 'r' C7 H \ CO V) V) Cn Z CO H CII CI t'' H H C1 Z C Z Z Cl) H H H H 0 H Z Z Z Z Cl) O Cr' H 0 C 0 0 0 0 \ 0 0 H a C) c) C) N C H N Cl)a ,ZZZZ 17:1Z C) H C aaaa C Cl)fn En,T1 f? H a Cl) rrrr a' r C CnC: a .-Es 'b Z 'a H C) cnNCn H Cn ' V) roro H C• r H t" tr1 Cr' Ca Cr' Cr' Cl) CII r CZr1 H H Z H C: H Cr' H Z ;a r 73 73x ;a H CM 03 Z Cr1 C) C C C C H C Cr1 z � � '1 a Cl) Cr' HHHH Z H Cl) 1-3 H Z 0 0 0 0 C') C) 0 0 Cr1 C7 C71 C7 CII .a O o 0 0 0 0 a. ON .O a` 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 a W W W W W W V+ a. W O. a, r r W H 0 H H 0 r H H H H H .O H N 0 r N) r N W a. -4 H C) N H N N r H a. WNH H V+ r H HHNH 0 I I I I I I i i i I I I I i I i I C r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r w r r Z N W N N N W tJ W (a 4> W W N V+ W a. N N H H N Nr H w HHHH V+ H H ln NHHH 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 H V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 0 0 0 0 Z NO r r r r r r r r r r w r r r r r r < a. V V V V a` ON a, ON ON Cr, ON 0' Cr, ON a\ ON 0 rn N H H 0 .o CO 00 CO 0) V rn V+ r r r r H C) Cr1 ro 0 z C z 'v C) z CH H H H H H HH H H H H H a.tiy 'a ,0 ,13 '13 ^: ro -croro "V .11 "v .11 ro 'c 'a .ti t•-•' n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 4, r r r r r r r r r r t) 0 r r r r r r r r r r r n Z �1 v -.1 _ �1 -_1 -1 J v . x n V+ V+ V+ V+ r .- r r r .' r H ut W N 03 J a. In A W N Z r 0 n r r H H r H H H H H H H H H H H n x .0 .0 .0 .0 1/40 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 x CT) 1/40 1/40 1/40 .0 .0 1/40 1/40 1/40 •0 1/40 1/40 .0 .0 .0 •0 1/40 t=) Cl W W W W (..... 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, r .f 4, 4, 4,.4, C) x \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ x H H H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pci N N N N N H H H H H H HHHHH C7 Cr, \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ 9 G) N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-3 H .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 H r H H H HHHHH t=) H t1) 0 7d x <A </)</D til N H H V>V) V> V) V> -CO -CO C) 1-3 N H H r H rn rn H HH x - - - - - . v> <o v> vto >to - - to • - v> tooto <o v> - 0 I-. r CO N a. V+ V+ In V+ r <I) N '0 •0 1 4, w W . . v {I> V> N H H N F 4, N H H N) N O O J 00 0o V+ In v v W W N N W CO .L O. .0 .1 03 0 W W N 0 H 1/40 1/40 00 CO O+ 00 CO 1/40 1/40 0 0 N N N N J-. J v a. N H W 0 CD C C) 03 03 VI J 00 -s 4- 03 03 H 0 0 0 0 0 O a. a. W (..3 .0 r W 0) N r W Z •V+ In 03 .P a. a. W CO H V+ a. 0 0 0 0 .0 .0 J -1 W N .L O a. r -W .3 Wo * * * * * * * * * * r Z x a c H c o00Ca 1/40 '0 9 C7 'Z) H H 9 ro H 9 ZZZZZ •0 ,� rr to to to r HHHHH 4> C) H9 H til H 0 Cr1 O O O O O 1-3 t-3 Z `VI V 0 U Cl) ib is 7c 7d al oa 0 U) � 10 VI.< to Z C 10 t) CI to t)f to Z -- tntn 9 Z 0 ZZZZZ 0 W CO W H H0 r P:1 H H H 3 p-3 0 N tz, tz, ts, 1-1 1-9 99999 7d F, 7N rr H cn rrrrr Z •3to to U) a) r+7 tr1 al C.1 t) 1-3 d iv '� 7v 7d 7v ,...1z C C C C C O O 0 HHHHH roro ZZZZZ tri t) 0 0 0 n n O •,ri ,TI t)f n 0 0 0 C o O to to 0 0 0 N H H .0 9 P-0 10 1-3 1-3 hi ro 00 'v101•0 .0 n H 0 Z tr) L=7 H H tzi U H H [+7 ttr11 t) H \ b b t11 H H C7 C7 9 9 Z9 Z 7d HH ►3 H H H HHHHH t7 t1) rt; t=) H H ►C 'C H H Z Z H H H til cH') r H Z 00 to v> C) Z " c) 000 0 til N Cn to V> t/) H C C C C C H H C C C 10 tz) b hi hi H H b b Z Z 'd b b P-3 9 .-0 1-0 0 n ro "'Cl HHro 'd 'v HH 'd > H H H H H H H Z 1-4 CO til rx1 a t-' N V) C17 to V) C0 t0 C.0 to to N Cv t=) r .0 .0 .0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 CoODH a. H r r H cr. a. W � 4, a 4 n H H H 4, r A N CO r � r H N N N r n 0 0 0 H 0 H H H W H H HHHHH 0 I 11 I I I I I I I I mil 0 H H H 1 H .L N A •L r r r r r r r Z H H H In H N N W W N N N N N N N H -1 -1 J V+ �1 H H CO CO H H W W H H H J t+> H 0 -J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # O H H N 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO CO W 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 H H -1 0 0 0 1/40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z 4- a. r 4 r 0) 4, 4: r 4- 4. 4` 4, 4, C 03 v+ v v v Ln v v v v v v J J 0 O .0 CO 00 0) -1 a. V+ -P. - - H t=) 'd 0 z c z 'd 67, tro Z C �1 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 9 b b 'd b 'd 'd 'd ro 'd ro '0 'o ro ro 'd '^.. r 0 0 V V V V 7C C) VI LSI VI VI H .O 0) 4 Cr Z t" O 0 r r r r 0 x .O .O .O .O x [TJ .o .o .o .O to 0 x Pq I-' H r H 77 N N N.) N C7 t+1 N N.) N.) N.) H H .O .O .O .O C71 G) H tO 0 73 <A x N in V) it, L) L=) ON to <n <n to r r r r c) H r N N .t 1, In V+ r r 7C 0 rr .o .o ww rnrn L.) 4,1 43 ON Cr, ON ON .' tom C r r 4 -4 N N o 0 0 m • • • • • • c C) L., Lo L...) NN 00 .0 .0 Z • w r r as 0' 0 o r-r H w * * * * 0 r C C C/) b •o (/) C/) '0 .D x M CC) tri w 7y C7 C7 t1 � a < co z w H H 0 N z z 70 •• G) O r r P1:- a C) o C) C) 0 0 � C z z H H N N " -) L.) C.) H V+ P-' Cl) r 0 c) CO Cil I 0 r 0 C7 to 0 ) C/) Z CI CI 0 H C '0 C/) H H 0 Z kb s.0 '0 .a > 03 CO 0 CO 0 I-. r 0 r C) 0 0 r 0 0 I I I I N N w N Z H r ON r H -.) -I N CO CO CO 0 w # r r 0 r CO CO 0 CO H I-. r 0 r Z r c CO 0 r H 0 t=) '0 0 Z R .ti Cl • CD O z c co HH H .. 'v 'o 'v -...._ r '=J '71 P] 17i j K7 'z] '=7 'z7 '17 '=7 Px1 'z7 C) C C C c C C c C C C c C c o z z z z z z az z z z z z z C ti Cy Cy C1 et Cy z 0 Cy e) C7 t7 C7 C) z C7 0 * * k * t 4k * * * * * * * H * r 0 .o 00 0, V .L- . r . w w r I- 0 x .D 1- r W W W A N N t.) 0 I- r 0 t4 0 0 0 0 V a. N r 0 N w V+ . r c) .0 x t/ t=f b Cl) r r C) ro r r x H C) to t=7 Cl) a 0 .0 .0 r a . .D ;ut-xl ►ji n .0 0 •o •a 01/4 b .o0 Z CD 9 z c0 0 `'� 1/40 he c a H tr-' C M M 770 ro tt 1 0 H H t-. i-C b b H ;u V) 0 Z 0 0 0 C 'Pi H 7o C H Cl) D Cr] t 1 [=1 171 < C7 H 0=7 ttI ttx C C t "17 W t7 Z Z Z e) tl a> H H 0 '=J n H La 0 H .0 N t!) iC N <la {A N W C. V+ 4, N <I) i/) V) r to h-' to In r .- V+ .0 co W W O. W Q O • 0 r. _ _ _ _ V Vt W V Q. .O - V 0 .O lJ+ . 0 W .O N r r N .O N 0 1--. to v) . 0 Co V -CO 0 O. N .- .t O. .O 0 r W N W 1/40 •• • CO . - W W 0 V CO 1/40 CO .O • N 0 W 0 N W 07 N w 0 0 V 0 w 0 CO 0 r r w CO 0) 0 w ro w Go cD r MEMO TO: Shakopee City Council FROM: Gary Laurent, Mayor RE: 1994 Liaison/Related Appointments DATE: December 29, 1993 Consistent with past Council practices I'm hereby making the following recommendations for appointments for 1994 : Shakopee Public Utilities Commission Liaison - Bob Sweeney Murphy's Landing Liaison - Joan Lynch Independent School District #720 Liaison - Kris Dirks Scott County Board of Commissioners Liaison - Bob Sweeney Shakopee Clubs and the Shakopee Coalition - Kris Dirks Shakopee Convention and Visitors Bureau - Mike Beard Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) - Joan Lynch Alternate to AMM - Kris Dirks Suburban Rate Authority - Mike Beard Suburban Rate Authority Alternate - Bob Sweeney Vice Mayor, City of Shakopee - Mike Beard I would appreciate the City Council endorsing the above mentioned appointments. The Suburban Rate Authority specifically requires a resolution for the appointment of both the Director and Alternate Director from the City of Shakopee. Therefore a resolution is attached to this memo. While the Mayor does not have the authority to appoint the Chair of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, I would like to recommend that Joan Lynch be elected to that position by the members of the HRA. ACTION REQUESTED: 1) Move to approve the appointments as above mentioned. 2) Move to adopt Resolution No. 3934 , a resolution designating a Director and Alternate Director to the Suburban Rate Authority. RESOLUTION NO. 3934 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota as follows: Mike Beard is hereby designated to serve as a Director of the Suburban Rate Authority and Bob Sweeney is hereby designated to serve as the Alternate Director of the Suburban Rate Authority for the year 1994 and until their successors are appointed. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1993. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney JNSEN1� /\5A1 MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SUBJECT: Shakopee Senior Graduation Party, Inc. DATE: December 30, 1993 INTRODUCTION: The Shakopee Senior Graduation Party, Inc. is asking the City Council to waive the City's 30 day review period for their application for an exemption from obtaining a gambling license. BACKGROUND: The Shakopee Senior Graduation Party, Inc. desires to obtain authorization for exemption from lawful gambling license from the State Gambling Control Board. Prior to granting such an exemption status, the municipality in which the activity is to be conducted, has 30 days in which to request denial by the Gambling Control Board. The Shakopee Senior Graduation Party, Inc. can not wait for 30 days to pass because their raffle is scheduled for February 18th and they need to receive the exemption so that they can start selling raffle tickets. The Shakopee Senior Graduation Party, Inc. will certainly be complying with the city code which requires that 75% of its expenditures for lawful purposes be spent on lawful purposes conducted or located within the city's trade area. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to waive the 30 day review period for the Shakopee Senior Graduation Party, Inc. 's application for authorization for exemption from lawful gambling license and approve said application. Minnesota Lawful Gambling FOR BOARD USE ONLY CHK LG2zo Application for Authorization for NIT DATE ^`v 42-'93' Exemption from Lawful Gambling License F711 in the unshaded portions of this application for exemption and send it in at least 45 days before your gambling activity for processing. Name and Address of Organization / 1 Organization Name Currentprevious license number Currentprevtous exempt number ' t i l.., '"1:.•_o_. I •Ci - 33`< J��t- -.�1=t- �:iU tr' ��;(ix,.�.t(cz.ti�:,‘ s t 1--iti+; {' -' I `s Street City State Zp code I County gI1a r=CL. (lt{ti Tick,' S -\u±---e+'A 1-»05 37'.1 .�Cc Chief Executive Officer Daytime Phone Number Treasurer Daytime Phone Number q,,{\(_,\ L .,'.T..-qtr- cu ) (-19(, l Jtc,-- i t-r,(_ _i t_Tct.t.(- ((ah) cist(4-lso5" Type of Non-profit Organization 'Check the box that indicates your proof of nonprofit Check the box below which indicates your type of organization status and attach a copy of the proof to the application. ❑ Fraternal ❑ IRS designation CA 6 (i • 1(•(" ivi k a .lam ❑ Veterans ❑ Certification of good standing from the Minnesota LY e;,,t,,{- ❑ Religious Secretary of State's office (/A._. 'l f.,:. v a ;-f- gOther non-profit ❑ Affiliate of parent nonprofit organization(charter) Gambling Site Name of ste were aciivity will take place 3Kat e. 5l` k ►i5c -a Street City Township Stale Zip code County 10 tit, fLr Lew,i J �i--) !�y� MN 6S311 Sr o-H— Dale(s)of activity(for raffles,indicate the date of the drawing) fi&9J4 i gl 0914 Types of Games Financial Report Market Value of Prizes Expanses,Includ=.ng (Including Donations Game(s) Gross Receipts Cost of Prizes Nat Profit-. and cash) Bingo ❑ Raffles Paddlewheels ❑ Tipboards ❑ Pull-tabs ❑ I' ._ I declare all information submitted to the Distrbutor from whom gambiing equipment was purchased Gambling Control Board is true, accurate, Dstrbutors license number :. and complete. !declare all financial information submitted to the Gambling Control Board Is true,accurate,and complete.-_ Lvti l..-f 3_`13 1t1 r ,i/1 I -13-93 Chief Ex cutiv Officer's ignaturl Date `Chief Exec ve Officer'sAlgnatu a Date Local Unit of Governs t Acknowledgment I have received a copy of this application. This application will be reviewed by the Gambling Control Board and will become effective 30 days from the date of receipt by the city or county,unless thelocal unit of government passes a resolution to specifically prohibit the activity. A copy of that resolution must be received by the Gambling Control Board within 30 days of the date tilled In below. Cities of the first Bass have 60 days in which to disallow the activity. City or County Township Township is City of courtly name Township name ❑organized ` IAA, Q2 ❑ unorganized' Si ure ers n receiving apolic n� Signature of person receiving application ❑ unincorporated' ✓ L )• / 3 3 *Attach letter Title I Dale received Title Dale Received _ V (IL This form vbe made available Mail with $25 permit fee and copy of White Original in alternative format(i.e. large proof of nonprofit status to: Yellow-Board returns to print,braille)upon request. Gambling Control Board Organization to complete 1711 W. County Rd. B, Ste. 300 S. shaded areas Roseville, MN 55113 OkSEN1 /6e �6b MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk SUBJECT: Apportionment of Special Assessments DATE: December 30, 1993 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: As a result of the subdivision of land into The Meadows 9th Addition and into Milwaukee Manor First Addition, existing special assessments need to be reapportioned into the newly described lots. Attached for City Council consideration are two resolutions which will accomplish these apportionments. Mr. Fleck has agreed to the apportionment in his developers agreement for The Meadows 9th Addition. Mr. Menke's developers agreement did not include the reapportionment because the assessments were levied after his plat was recorded (October 29, 1993) . He has been sent a copy of the proposed apportionment. He has a right to question the manner in which the apportionment was done, if he cares to do so. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Offer Resolution No. 3932 , A Resolution Apportioning Assessments Among New Parcels Created As A Result of Platting of The Meadows 9th Addition, and move its adoption. 2 . Offer Resolution No. 3931, A Resolution Apportioning Assessments Among New Parcels Created As A Result of Platting of Milwaukee Manor First Addition, and move its adoption. RESOLUTION NO. 3931 A RESOLUTION APPORTIONING ASSESSMENTS AMONG NEW PARCELS CREATED AS A RESULT OF PLATTING OF MILWAUKEE MANOR FIRST ADDITION WHEREAS, on November 3, 1993, Resolution No. 3890 adopted by the City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted by construction of the alley between Market Street and Outlot A of Eastview Addition and Minnesota Street/Dakota Street from 7th Avenue North to the Alley, Project No. 1993-5; and WHEREAS, four lots assessed for said improvements have been re-platted into Milwaukee Manor First Addition and are identified as Lot 6, Block 309, PID #27-008018-0, Lots 6 and 7 Block 314 PID #27-008062-0 and 27-008063-0, and Lot 4, Block 317, PID #27-008067- 0; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to apportion the installments remaining unpaid against said four lots because of the platting of Milwaukee Manor First Addition; and WHEREAS, the property owners have been advised of the proposed apportionment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, That the 1993 payable remaining balance of assessments to parcel 27-008018-0 in the amount of $1, 386. 37, to parcel 27-008062-0 in the amount of $1,386. 37, to parcel 27-008063- 0 in the amount of $1, 387.37, and to parcel 27-008067 in the amount of $1,755.74 for the 1993-5 improvements are hereby apportioned as outlined in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all other parts of Resolution Number 3890 shall continue in effect. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 4th day of January, 1994 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form , City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" to Resolution No. 3931 Assessment Reapportionment for P.I.D. 27-008018-0, 27-008062-0, 27-008063-0, 27-008067-0 December 20, 1993 LEGAL 1993-5 P.I.D. NO. OWNER DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT 27-179039-0 Leroy R & Darlene Menke Outlot G $1,386.37 1185 S. Shumway St. Milwaukee Manor Shakopee, Mn. 55379 First Addition 27-179040-0 Leroy R & Darlene Menke Outlot H $2,772.74 1185 S. Shumway St. Milwaukee Manor Shakopee, Mn. 55379 First Addition 27-179041-0 Leroy R & Darlene Menke Outlot I $1,755.74 1185 S. Shumway St. Milwaukee Manor Shakopee, Mn. 55379 First Addition Total = $5,914.85 RESOLUTION NO. 3932 A RESOLUTION APPORTIONING ASSESSMENTS AMONG NEW PARCELS CREATED AS A RESULT OF PLATTING OF THE MEADOWS 9TH ADDITION WHEREAS, on August 25, 1981, Resolution No. 1891 adopted by the City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted by construction of the 1981-1 V.I.P. Interceptor; and WHEREAS, on September 20, 1988, Resolution No. 2946 adopted by the City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted by construction of the Valley Industrial Park Sewer Extension from the West side of County Road 17 to the East side of County Road 79, Project No. 1987-13; and WHEREAS, on October 18, 1988, Resolution No. 2974 adopted by the City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid against the parcels created because of the platting of The Meadows 1st Addition; and WHEREAS, on October 3, 1989, Resolution No. 3121 adopted by the City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid against the parcels created because of the platting of The Meadows 2nd Addition; and WHEREAS, part of Outlots B and E of The Meadows 1st Addition and Outlots A and D of The Meadows 2nd Addition have been subdivided into the plat of The Meadows 4th Addition; and WHEREAS, on June 5, 1990, Resolution No. 3237 adopted by the City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid against the parcels created because of the platting of The Meadows 4th Addition; and WHEREAS, the balance of Outlot E of The Meadows 1st Addition has been subdivided into the plat of The Meadows 5th Addition; and WHEREAS, on August 6, 1991, Resolution No. 3437 adopted by the City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid against the parcels created because of the platting of The Meadows 5th Addition; and WHEREAS, Outlot C, The Meadows 4th Addition and Outlots B & C, The Meadows 5th Addition have been subdivided into the plat of The Meadows 6th Addition; and WHEREAS, on November 19, 1991, Resolution No. 3494 adopted by the City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid against the parcels created because of the platting of The Meadows 6th Addition; and Resolution No. 3932 Page -2- WHEREAS, Outlot A, The Meadows 3rd Addition, Outlot B, The Meadows 1st Addition, and Outlot B, The Meadows 6th Addition have been subdivided into the plat of The Meadows 7th Addition; and WHEREAS, on August 18th, 1992, Resolution No. 3644 adopted by the City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid against the parcels created because of the platting of The Meadows 7th Addition; and WHEREAS, on November 17, 1992, Resolution No. 3705 adopted by the City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted by construction of the Vierling Drive roadway improvements from CR- 17 to CR-79 , Project No. 1992-3 ; and WHEREAS, Outlot A, The Meadows 7th Addition has been subdivided into the plat of The Meadows 8th Addition; and WHEREAS, on March 2 , 1993 , Resolution No. 3750 adopted by the City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid against the parcels creeated because of the platting of The Meadows 8th Addition; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to apportion the installments remaining unpaid against Outlot A, The Meadows 8th Addition and part of Outlot A, The Meadows 1st Addition because of the platting of The Meadows 9th Addition; and WHEREAS, the property owners have agreed to the apportionment through the execution of a developers agreement for The Meadows 9th Addition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA That the 1993 payable remaining balance of assessments to parcel 27-136-054-0 in the amount of $706.70 for the 1981-1 V.I.P. Interceptor, $4,277.91 for the 1987-13 V.I.P. Sanitary Sewer Extension, and $0 for the 1992-3 Vierling Drive Roadway Improvements; and the 1993 payable remaining balance of " assessments to parcel 27-173-053-0 in the amount of $1, 565.91 for the 1981-1 V. I.P. Interceptor, $9,477.97 for the 1987-13 V.I.P. Sanitary Sewer Extension, and $62,758.54 for the 1992-3 Vierling Drive Roadway Improvements are hereby apportioned as outlined in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all other parts of Resolution Numbers 1891, 2946, 2974, 3121, 3237, 3437, 3494, 3644, 3705 and 3750 shall continue in effect. Resolution No. 3932 Page -3- Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 4th day of January, 1994. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form , City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" to Res . No. 3932 Page 1 of 3 Assessment Reapportionment for Meadows 9th Addition November 2, 1993 December 22, 1993 P.I.D. NO. OWNER LEGAL 1981-1 1987-3 1992-3 DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 27-136054-0 WETTERLIN DEV. OUTLOT A EX. HWY. $608.53 $4,119.49 $0.00 6609 DAKOTA TRAIL MEADOWS 1ST EDINA, MN. 55435 ADDITION 27-180001-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 1 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 554-45 ADDITION 27-180002-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 2 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180003-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 3 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180004-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 4 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180005-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 5 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDMON 27-180006-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 6 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180007-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 7 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDmON 27-180008-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 8 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDMON 27-180009-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 9 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDmON 27-180010-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 10 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION 27-1809011-O GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 11 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180012-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 12 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDmON 27-180013-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 1 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180014-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 2 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180015-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 3 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDmON Page 2 of 5 Assessment Reapportionment for Meadows 9th Addition November 2, 1993 December 22, 1993 P.I.D. NO. OWNER LEGAL 1981-1 1987-3 1992-3 DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 27-1800016-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 4 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180017-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 5 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180018-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 6 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180019-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 7 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180020-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 8 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180021-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 9 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180022-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 10 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180023-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 11 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180024-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 12 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180025-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 13 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180026-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 14 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180027-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 15 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180028-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 16 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180029-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 1 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180030-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 2 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180031-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 3 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION Page 3 of 3 Assessment Reapportionment for Meadows 9th Addition November 2, 1993 December 22, 1993 P.I.D. NO. OWNER LEGAL 1981-1 1987-3 1992-3 DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 27-180032-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 4 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH IBROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180033-0 (GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 5 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180034-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 6 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180035-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 7 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180036-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 8 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180037-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 9 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180038-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 10 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180039-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 11 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180040-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 12 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITON 27-180041-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 13 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDmON 27-180042-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 14 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180043-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 15 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180044-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 16 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180045-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 17 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180046-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 18 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180047-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 19 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDmON Page 4 of 3 Assessment Reapportionment for Meadows 9th Addition November 2, 1993 December 22, 1993 P.I.D. NO. OWNER LEGAL 1981-1 1987-3 1992-3 DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 27-180048-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 1 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 5936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180049-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 2 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180050-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 3 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180051-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 4 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 S936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180052-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 5 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180053-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 6 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180054-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 7 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDMON 27-180055-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 8 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180056-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 9 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180057-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 1 BLOCK 5 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180058-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 2 BLOCK 5 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180059-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 3 BLOCK 5 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH - BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180060-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 4 BLOCK 5 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180061-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 5 BLOCK 5 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9T1-1 BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDm0N 27-180062-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 6 BLOCK 5 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION 27-180063-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 7 BLOCK 5 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDmON Page 3 of 3 Assessment Reapportionment for Meadows 9th Addition November 2, 1993 December 22, 1993 P.I.D. NO. OWNER LEGAL 1981-1 1987-3 1992-3 DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 27-180064-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 1 BLOCK 6 $23.92 $143.61 $936.45 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180065-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 2 BLOCK 6 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180066-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 3 BLOCK 6 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION 27-180067-0 GOLD NUGGET CEV. LOT 4 BLOCK 6 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70 8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION TOTALS= $2,200.61 $13,755.88 $62,758.65 CONSENT ) 6c TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Resolution No. 3935 Related to 4M Fund Proxy DATE: December 29, 1993 Introduction The membership of the Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund will be voting on changes in the operation of the fund. This resolution designates person to execute the vote. Background A portion of the City's funds are invested in the Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund. The Council previously authorized participation in the fund. The Board of Trustees is recommending that three changes be made in the operation of the fund; 1.) authorization to offer additional investment options, 2.) authorization to use slightly longer maturities in the basic fund, and 3.) authorize the use of reverse repurchase agreements by the portfolio manager. Implementing the changes requires an amendment of the Declaration of Trust which requires a vote of the membership. The attached resolution, if adopted, would designate myself to vote on the changes on behalf of the city and to execute the proxy. This authorization is valid for only one time which is the issues to be voted on at the 2/2/94 meeting. Failure to adopt the resolution would result in no affirmative vote being submitted by the City. Staff has a copy of all the documents related to this issue. Alternatives 1. Do not vote. 2. Designate the Finance Director. 3. Designate some other person. Recommendation Alternative number 2. Action Offer Resolution No. 3935 A Resolution Authorizing Execution of Proxy in Favor Of Certain amendments to The Declaration Of Trust Of The Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund, and move its adoption. RESOLUTION NO. 3935 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF PROXY IN FAVOR OF CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE DECLARATION OF TRUST OF THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL MONEY MARKET FUND. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee , Minnesota as follows: Section 1. Background. 1. 01 The City of Shakopee is a participant in the Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (4M Fund) , by reason of its approval of a joint powers agreement in the form of a Declaration of Trust. 1. 02 The City has been asked to consider certain amendments to the Declaration of Trust of the 4M Fund. 1. 03 The City has reviewed and considered the proposed amendments to the Declaration of Trust as described in the attached proxy statement and amended Declaration of Trust. Section 2 . Authorization 2. 01 The City of Shakopee approves the proposed amendments described in the proxy statement and amended Declaration of Trust. 2. 02 At a meeting of the 4M Fund participants to be held on February 2, 1994, Gregg Voxland is authorized to attend and vote on behalf of the city in favor of the proposed amendments, or in the alternative, is authorized to execute the attached proxy in favor the amendments and forward it to the proxy agent to be voted accordingly. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shakopee Minnesota, on the day. of , 19_. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Attorney A. Oi\1SENT RESOLUTION NO. 3936 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, REQUESTING THE USE OF A SCOTT COUNTY BUILDING FOR POLICE TRAINING. WHEREAS, the Scott County Highway Department has taken possession of the building located at the following address : 2006 County Road 18, in the City of Shakopee; and WHEREAS, this building is scheduled for demolition in order to make room for additional road construction; and WHEREAS, the Shakopee Police Department would like to use this building for police training purposes including stealth entry, dynamic entry, room searches, officer down rescues, and general team movement; and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee would assume all liability for all claims for damage, actions or causes of action arising out of negligent acts of the Police Department, its agents and employees, hold the County of Scott harmless from any such claims; and WHEREAS, the County of Scott has tentatively agreed to the use of this building for police training purposes subject to the passage of this resolution. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee that the Shakopee Police Department is authorized to arrange with the Scott County Highway Department for the use of the premises at 2006 County Road 18, in Shakopee, Minnesota, for training purposes . Dated this day of 1994 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest : City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney [BURNING.RES]