HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/04/1994 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items
DATE: December 30, 1993
1 . Attached are the December 2nd, 9th, and 16th, 1993 minutes of
the Planning Commission and the December 9th, 1993 Board of
Adjustment and Appeals minutes .
2 . Attached are the January 6, 1994 agendas for the Planning
Commission and Board of Adjustment & Appeals meetings .
3 . Attached is a News Release from the Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission regarding the MWCC Releasing the Chief
Administrator.
4 . Attached is information regarding the 1994 Conference for
Newly Elected Officials and Seminars for Elected Officials .
If you are interested in attending, please contact Toni to be
registered.
5 . Attached is the January Business Update from City Hall .
6 . Attached is the January calendar of Upcoming Meetings .
7 . Attached is the Police Newsletter for Council review.
8 . Attached is the monthly report from the Planning Department .
9 . Attached is the monthly report from the Engineering
Department .
10 . Attached is the monthly report from the Community Services
Department .
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE PLANNING COMMISSION
Special Session Shakopee, Minnesota December 2, 1993
MEMBERS PRESENT: Joos, Spurrier, Kelly, Madigan
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mars, Christensen, Zak
STAFF PRESENT: Lindberg Ekola, City Planner
Karen Marty, City Attorney
Lisa Anderson, Recording Secretary
IROLL CALL
Chrmn. Joos called the meeting to order at 6: 07 p.m.
Roll call was taken as noted above.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved as presented.
III. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO
CHAPTER 11, LAND USE REGULATION (ZONING) OF THE SHAKOPEE
CITY CODE.
Chrmn. Joos opened the public hearing to consider
amendments to the Shakopee City Code.
SIGN REGULATIONS:
The City Planner pointed out that the sign regulations
was last updated in 1988-89 . The City Attorney stated
that staff recommended deleting paragraphs 5 and 6 on
page 2 and 3 . These changes have been changed to the
Ideological and Non-Commercial Signs section. This
change is to avoid legal action provisions:-
Comm. Zak arrived at 6: 14 p.m.
Comm. Spurrier stated a concern that some temporary signs
obstruct view of the right-of-way traffic. He would like
to see something specifically stated in the ordinance
dealing with temporary signs. The City Attorney
responded that signs are prohibited in the public right-
of-way other than signs put there by the government. She
also stated that staff is recommending that political
signs not be allowed in the public right-of-way anymore
than any other non-governmental sign.
Comm. Spurrier asked what class of signs real estate
signs are categorized under and if they are prohibited
also. The City Attorney stated that the real estate
signs right-of-way. Comm.allowed in any residential
zone
asked
public
whether there
Minutes of the Page- 2
Shakopee Planning Commission December 2, 1993
was a time frame on these signs. The City Attorney
responded that the signs have to be removed shortly after
the event has taken place, but they can go up any time
prior to the event.
Chrmn. Joos recognized anyone in the audience wishing to
comment on this matter. Jon Albinson, 5240 Valley
Industrial Boulevard, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached the
podium. He asked whether, billboards was included in
Subd. 2-Al.
Comm. Mars arrived at 6:19 p.m.
The City Attorney responded that the billboards that were
put up prior to the last ordinance are legal but anything
put up after that will have to be taken down. The City
Planner pointed out that paragraph 4, on page 12, allows
for area identifications signs to be placed at each
driveway into a public street. The City Attorney read
the definition for area 'identification signs. • Mr.
Albinson suggested changing the wording "for each
driveway" to "for each street" . The City Attorney agreed
with that suggestion.
Bob Sweeney, 506 Holmes, Shakopee, Minnesota, approached
the podium. He clarified what Mr. Albinson was
suggesting.
It was the consensus from the Commission to change the
wording for paragraph 4 on page 12 to read "for each
entrance" instead of "for each driveway" .
°..i* "" Comm..1.Spurr.iery,asked if there..was a. legal non-conforming,
sign, how long could it stay there and-what happens' to
cause the removal. The City Attorney responded that
legal non-conforming signs can stay until it needs
structural changes.
Jon Albinson, 5240 Valley Industrial Boulevard, Shakopee,
Minnesota, approached the podium. He stated a concern
that on page 11, Subd. Dl, Wall Signs, the square footage
for which a sign is mounted is too small. Bob Sweeney
suggested adding a sentence that refers to multiple
tenant buildings and tie it into the space occupied by
the tenant of the building.
The City Attorney stated that these provisions do exist
in the B-1 zone on Page 6, paragraph B1, however they do
not exist in the multi-tenant buildings and any other
zone because at the time the original ordinance was
drafted, this was not common. She clarified that the one
hundred square feet was limited per tenant in the B-1 and
B-2 zones. She suggested moving that language to the I-1
and I-2 zones.
- 3
Page Minutes of the Decembpa 1993
Shakopee Planning Commission
Comm. Zak suggested that more information be gathered
regarding this. He suggested looking at what other
suburbs have done. He would like to see the signs all be
one standard size and be consistent throughout the
community. Chrmn. Joos agreed to having conformity of
all the signs.
Comm. Mars suggested adding another paragraph on multiple
tenants to offer some uniformity and one sign for each
business.
Jon Albinson stated that he agrees with staff to expand.
the B-1 and B-2 zones into an I-1 and I-2 zone. The City
Planner pointed out that you need a larger sign for
larger buildings in order to look good. He suggested
maybe it should be changed to something like not to
exceed 30 or 50 square feet.
Chrmn. Joos asked the staff to come back with more
information regarding this matter.
Motion: Comm. Zak/Spurrier offered a motion to adopt
the sign ordinance as written with provisions to be added
later by staff on percentage of square footage and other
sign considerations.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously: -
OVERLAY DISTRICTS:
The City Planner stated that there are four overlay
districts: Planned Unit Development Overlay, Mineral
Extraction Overlay, Shoreland Overlay, and Floodplain
Overlay. He gave a brief overview of the recommendations
from ZORC. The City Attorney pointed out staff's
recommendations. She stated that page 92 through 96 has
not been deleted but instead moved to the Administrative
Provisions. She stated that each of these districts
should say what they are and what they allow.
Bob Sweeney suggested that with respect to the PUD, some
wording should be added emphasizing the flexibility
available to staff in negotiating trade-offs within the
20 percent open space requirement. The City Planner
stated that it is important to distinguish between what
is park land and what is open space. He clarified that
open space is intended for residents of that PUD, and
park land is intended for the public as a whole. He
pointed out that park land and open space are not the
sane.
Minutes of the Page- 4
Shakopee Planning Commission December 2, 1993
Comm. Spurrier asked for the definition of open space.
The City Attorney stated that that was not one of the
defined words, but would get that definition if that was
desirable.
Comm. Kelly pointed out that there is nothing in here
regarding traffic development. The City Planner
responded that requiring a traffic analysis would be a
good idea. Chrmn. Joos suggested that school district
boundaries also be incorporated in this section. Comm.
Spurrier stated that he feels the development portion
belongs in the subdivision regulations and not in this
section. Comm. Kelly would like to see it left optional
on the subdivision provision, but made mandatory in the
PUD process. The City Planner stated he agreed with
Comm. Spurrier's comment to keep the different provisions
separate.
Motion: Comm. Spurrier/Madigan move to advance this
language.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously.
MINERAL EXTRACTION DISTRICT:
The City Attorney pointed out that this is a new zone.
She stated that the intention is to allow mining only as
a rezoning as opposed to allowing it within the zoning
district. She gave a brief overview of the staff
recommendations. She pointed out that the title has been
changed from Mineral Extraction to Mining. She also
pointed out changes on pages 99 and 100 . The City
Attorney suggested adoption of the staff recommendations
and she would have the rest of the changes at the next
meeting.
Chrmn. Joos suggested that on page 99, item G, the words
"when adjoining residential areas" be added.
Comm. Spurrier suggested that a 2 foot contour interval
be added to the plan submittal requirements in this
section. He feels there should be a provision for a bond
to reclaim the property.
The City Attorney responded that as an overlay district
it is allowed to be put in place in any location of the
city.
Bob Sweeney pointed out that ZORC suggested this be
limited to the I-2 District.
Mina Page- 5
of the Page-
g, 5
Shakopee Planning Commission
3
Chrmn. Joos pointed out that on page 98 Subd. 6A, this
was changed to five hundred feet and stated that he feels
if it is lowered, he would like to see it read, "land
owners" within five hundred feet. Comm. Spurrier stated
he would like to incorporate soil and geological concerns
into this also.
Comm. Zak asked for clarification of the difference
between spot zoning and an overlay district. The City
Planner and the City Attorney provided a brief
description of the difference between the two terms.
Chrmn. Joos recognized anyone from the audience wishing
to speak regarding this matter.
John Voss, Planning Consultant, 7300 West 147th Street,
Apple Valley, AVR, Inc. , approached the podium. He
stated that he feels having an overlay district is a good
idea because it incorporates the comprehensive planning
process into the mining approval process. Mr. Voss also
requested clarification of the word "mining" . The City
Attorney read the definition for mining and explained
what was meant by stock piling.
Mr. Voss also commented on Subd. 5-B regarding the 500
foot provision. He stated that it could be difficult to
get permission from an adjacent land owner to mine that
close and recommended that the 500 foot provision be
changed to 600 feet.
Mr. Voss also pointed out that the only place a ready mix
plant is allowed is by a conditional use permit and in an
I-2 , Heavy Industrial district. He stated that this may
cause some problems and advised that the Planning
Commission reconsider this proposal. Mr. Voss handed out
and read to the Planning Commission a proposal to add two
different provisions which is marked as "Exhibit A" .
Jon Albinson stated the intent of ZORC was to minimize
the number of mineral extraction areas we have in the
City of Shakopee. He also stated that he doesn't agree
with Mr. Voss's rationale.
Bob Sweeney explained why ZORC recommended mineral
extraction not having a conditional use in the
agricultural zone and why ZORC limited it to the I-2
Zone.
Comm. Mars asked for clarification of what was meant by
a screening barrier and how high they needed to be as
stated in Subd. 6 B. The City Attorney stated that the
Minutes of the Page- 6
Shakopee Planning Commission limber 2, 1993
height and width is not specified in the provision and
suggested that that be added.
Motion: Comm. Spurrier/Madigan offered a motion to
accept the sections that were reviewed, absent the
exceptions that are going to be reworked by Staff.
Comm. Mars clarified that this motion is accepted as an
overlay only in the I-2 District. It does not approve
any portable ready mix plant. Vote: Motion carried
five to one with Comm. Mars voting against.
IV. OTHER BUSINESS
Comm. Spurrier offered a motion to continue the public
hearing to December 16, 1993, at 6:00 p.m.
V. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8: 35 p.m.
SHAKOPEE 12-2-93
Mineral Extraction Overlay District
Proposal to add the following:
Subdivision 3 Conditional Uses
c) Portable concrete ready mix
b
Subdivision 7 Development Standards
i) Portable ready mix shall utilize aggregate mined on the
site, shall only exist as an interim use while aggregate
is available and shall be discontinued thereafter or when
the overlay district is removed, whichever shall occur first.
j) Portable ready mix shall only be permitted where the operation
has direct access to a County Road or State Highway and shall
not take direct access to a local street.
k) Portable ready mix shall be located a minimum distance of 600 ft.
from the nearest residence and shall be completely screened from
public view except for an enclosed tower.
I) Portable ready mix shall be accessory to the mineral extraction
on the site and shall be limited to a maximum of ten (10) ready
mix trucks and any other C.U.P. conditions which the City may
establish to protect the health, safety and welfare on adjacent
properties.
Reasons for Reouest:
r . Hauling
Aggregate material can be processed on site rather than transported
to an Industrial District.
2. Trio Reduction
30 ready mix loads would require 20 loads of aggregate material from
mining site to processing site.
3. Noise and Screening
There is an ability to recess the ready mix area on a mining site and
reduce noise and provide a visual screen.
4. More Rapid Use of Deposits
Ready mix on a mining site (interim use) may accelerate the mining
process because of demand for aggregate.
5. Interim Use
Ready mix would exist as a temporary/interim use only during the
life of mineral extraction and•overlay zoning. It would be removed
and not interfere with ultimate/end use.
6. City Control
City controls ready mix use by overlay zoning, which is temporary,
and by C.U.P. process and any conditions attached thereto.
7. Respond to Growth
This interim C.U.P. process makes ready mix available to a rapid
growth area during the term of rapid growth and is removed thereafter.
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 9, 1993
MEMBERS PRESENT: Joos, Madigan, Kelly, Zak, Christensen
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mars, Spurrier (arrived later)
STAFF PRESENT: Lindberg Ekola, City Planner
Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant Planner
Dave Hutton, City Engineer
Amy Wicklund, Planning Intern
Debra Zabel, Recording Secretary
ROLL CALL
Chrmn. Joos called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m.
Roll call was taken as noted above.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved as presented.
III. APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 4, 9 & 18, 1993 MEETING MINUTES
The minutes were approved as presented.
IV. RECOGNITION OF INTERESTED CITIZENS
Chrmn. Joos recognized anyone in the audience wishing to
speak on any item not on the agenda. There was no
response.
V. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA
Motion: Comm. Zak/Kelly offered a motion to approve the
Consent Agenda as presented.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously.
VI. OTHER BUSINESS
A. OFFICIAL MAPPING/LAND ACQUISITION
Motion: Comm. Christensen/Zak moved to table the item
for further review.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously with Comm. Spurrier not
voting due to his absence.
B. LAND ACQUISITION - WATER STORAGE FACILITY
The City Planner explained to the Commission that his
item had been tabled for further review. The proposed
Minutes of the Page- 2
Shakopee Planning Commission December 9, 1993
water storage facility is proposed to be located on Lot
1, Block 1, Maple Trails Estates 1st Addition. He stated
that the elevations identified would be appropriate for
this operation and a gravity system would be essential.
He stated that staff is recommending finding the proposed
land acquisition in compliance with the comprehensive
plan, and to recommend this to the City Council.
Comm. Christensen inquired that if this plan is in
compliance and is adopted, would it not be differing from
the new ordinance that is being planned and what changes
would come from that.
The City Planner explained that the Utilities Commission
has been working on utility structure height and some
type of ground storage, but no final recommendation has
been reached.
Motion: Comm. Christensen/Madigan offered a motion which
finds the proposed land acquisition of Lot ' l, Block 1,
Maple Trails Estates 1st Addition for the proposed water
storage facility in compliance with the adopted
Comprehensive Plan.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously. '
VII. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 376 FOR MINERAL EXTRACTION AND LAND
REHABILITATION, ORIGINALLY ISSUED TO NBZ ENTERPRISES,
UPON THE PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF CR 83, SOUTH OF CR 16
AND NORTH OF VALLEY VIEW RD.
The City Planner explained that Fischer Aggregates, Inc.
submitted applications for amending a Conditional Use
Permit and a Mineral Extraction and Land Rehabilitation
Permit for the mining operation located south of CR 16
and west of CR 83 . He stated that in 1988 the City
Council granted Scott County Lumber Company a permit for
mineral extraction and land rehabilitation on property
located in the Agricultural Zoning District. The
applicants recently held an informational meeting with
the neighbors. He stated that the application includes
expanding the site to include five acres, increasing
mining depth, side slopes and extending the hours of
operation.
John Voss, Planning Consultant for Urban Planning and
Design, explained the basics of what they were requesting
and referred to a 40-page manual they had distributed to
the Commission.
Liza Robson, Fischer Aggregates, Inc. , 5823 Pilot Knob
Road, Apple Valley, and Peter Fischer, 23795 Pennock
Avenue, Apple Valley, introduced themselves to the
Minutes of the Page- 3
Shakopee Planning Commission December 9, 1993
Commission. Peter explained that Liza and himself are
the owners of this mining operation. He stated that
their families have owned a similar operation in Apple
Valley for about 40 years and also own nine concrete
plants in the Metropolitan area.
Liza Robson stated that on November 23, 1993, they
conducted a meeting with the neighborhood and 12 people
were in attendance. She explained that they requested
the City Planner to go ahead with the Environmental
Assessment Worksheet (EAS) .
Kirsten Rowina, Geologist, explained that the plans that
have already been approved consist of mining in three
phases and each would be surrounded on all sides by
approximately a 20 foot embankment. The reason for this
being there is an 8 inch gas pipe line that runs through
the northern portion of the property. One request would
be to ask for a relocation of that pipe line as well as
purchasing the Rutt property and eliminating the driveway.
easement. Ms. Rogina stated that the proposed plan would
be to mine 20 to 40 feet below the existing grade instead
of the 12 to 20 feet now in effect. She stated the site
life is now expected to be 20 years, and that there would•
be more product taken out, but at a faster rate.
Ms. Rowina explained that the mining would be limited to
ten feet above the bedrock so when the property is
developed the installation of utilities would be
feasible. She stated for controlling dust generation,
they would pave the first 150 feet of the access and the
rest would be watered a on daily basis during the mining
season. There would also be eight foot high screening
berms around the active phases to reduce dust.
Reclamation would start in phase one by grading the site
and spreading 3 inches of top soil over the area and
planting seed for vegetation to minimize erosion. She
stated the Pollution Control Agency was involved for an
air emissions permit and storm water discharge permits.
Comm. Christensen asked about the reclamation and what
the property would be used for after the mining is
complete.
Ms. Rowina stated that moving the pipe line would not
affect reclamation. She stated that if the pipe line was
kept where it is, that portion could not be mined.
Chrmn. Joos asked about the City requirement of more than
three inches of topsoil.
Jim Benshof, Traffic Engineer, 7301 Holmes, Edina,
commented on the traffic review that was performed. He
projected that daily traffic generated would be 245 .
bines of the Page- 4
Shakopee Punning Cammoa December 9, 1993
However, adding the ready mix operation traffic, it would
be 305 daily trips. These volumes are shown for peak
hours of the day. He stated that the mining operations
would be closed from December to March. He stated that
traffic would operate at service level B, gravel traffic
expected to be 160 from the North on CR 83 and 145 to the
South. He stated the driveway would remain, but would be
improved; a right turn lane accommodates the driveway, an
acceleration taper lane to the south, and a bypass lane
for northbound traffic.
Chrmn. Joos commented that with the trucks turning into
the driveway and slowing down, what the possibility of
accidents would be. He commented that possibly a signal
would be appropriate.
Comm. Christensen asked whether the traffic study
accounted for Mystic Lake traffic and Canterbury traffic
also. She commented that the left turn onto CR 83 going
south would be a hazard since there is no cessation of
traffic at that point, and the time constraints of the
truck driver.
Jim Benshof stated that the traffic count was done in
1992 when the track was open.
Peter Fischer explained the tractors and trailers are 40
feet, or the size of a dump truck.
Comm. Zak stated that if Canterbury reopened the traffic
would be heavier and also the 1992 report would not
include Dakota Country at Mystic Lake.
The City Engineer explained that the County has done a
traffic signal warrant study at CR 16 and CR 83 and a
signal will be installed but he was not aware of the time
frame. He suggested that the Commission compare the
past truck traffic to what is being proposed.
John Voss commented that they are requesting to have the
operational hours to be from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. He stated
this property would be interim use of the MUSA line in
2010.
Todd Bradoe, neighbor of the gravel pit, commented that
he had not heard of the proposals until this meeting. He
was concerned about the where the water was going to come
from to have a wash house for the trucks and to water the
driveway daily. He stated that traffic on CR 83 is
already bad and adding the trucks or a stop light would
only make it worse. He stated that there are 40 foot
holes on the property and he was concerned about the
children in that area being around this environment.
bin of thePage- 5
Shakopee Yfanning Commalson December 9, 1993
Ken Rutt, owner of parcel, stated that he would be
selling his property to the mining company and would ask
the Commission to include his ..five acre parcel in their,-. .
review.
Beverly Koehnen, 2036 Canterbury Road, wanted to know who
owned NBZ. She stated that the company has already gone
deeper than their permits allow. She felt the hours
should not be extended and that the traffic .would only
worsen.
Kirsten Rowina, Geographer, stated there is a 300 foot
well on the site at this time. The Department of Natural
Resources requires a water appropriation permit and the
effect on surrounding wells is being looked at. She
stated that the slopes are steep and will get steeper
after the berms are brought down and area is back filled.
John Voss commented on the proposed finishing date would
be 2005. He stated that vandalism issues were discussed.
He stated that the company is concerned about liability
issues and would do the best they could to keep children
off the site.
Liza Robson explained that herself and Peter Fischer did
acquire interest in the gravel mine along with two other
partners from the former NBZ operation.
Comm. Zak asked to get more information about water
contamination and pumping of water exceeding usage.
Kirsten Rowina explained that the process introduces no
chemicals and typically mining operations do not have a
problem with contamination issues. She stated that the
cement mixing part would not be part of the proposal
unless the zoning ordinance was changed.
Comm.
Christensen landcoulded behe would u ed in like
years information
ground
on how
water issues, such as flooding.
Motion: Comm. Christensen/Kelly offered a motion which
accepts the applicant's request for a time extension
until such time as the Zoning Ordinance update process is
completed.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously with Comm. Spurrier
abstaining due to his absence during the discussion.
Comm. Spurrier asked whether the applicant was encouraged
by a City agent to amend this conditional use permit.
Nffin tes of the Page- 6
Shakopee mag Commiccion December !, 1993
John Voss stated they were doing this on their own.
Motion: Comm. Christensen/Zak moved to continue the
public hearing to the January 6, 1994, meeting.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously.
There was a recess taken at 9: 05 p.m.
VII. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: TO CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY
AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE EAGLE CREEK BLUFF
ADDITION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED EAST OF CR 18
AND SOUTH OF BOILING SPRINGS LANE.
The Assistant Planner explained this item was continued
to this meeting to allow additional time for the
applicant to address concerns of traffic, and water and
sewer. She stated that staff is requesting further
analysis from a regional perspective on the traffic
volumes. The traffic projections are 45 percent to the
east, 45 percent to the west and 10 percent to the north.
She stated that the applicant has submitted a new plan
with 80 foot right-of-way, but basically it's the same
plan. She commented that staff felt the layout needs to
be redesigned. She recommended that the public hearing
be continued to the January 6, 1994, meeting.
Dennis Griswold, Ryan Contracting in Burnsville, proposed
an 80 foot wide right-of-way on Eagle Creek Bluff and
stated that they would work with staff to determine the
actual pavement width and design. He stated another
change would be to put a sidewalk along Eagle Creek Bluff
instead of connecting to the path which was proposed
earlier. He stated they would be proposing a four foot
wide wood chip pathway through the corridor to connect to
the green space within Savage. He commented they would
be connecting with a common water system. He explained
the school district boundaries. He stated that the
extension of Eagle Creek Bluff into Savage would be
considered a residential collector street, this would
allow lots to front this type of street, which would be
36 feet wide.
Cnrmn. Joos stated his concern about traffic impact of
the Savage development upon Shakopee.
The City Planner explained that the City does not usually
allow for residential single family homes fronting on
ccllector streets. He stated these types of streets
usually have an 80 foot wide right-of-way.
ninths
of the December Pag9,e 7
Page-
-
Shakopee planning Commission
1993
The City Engineer explained that this could be
constructed as a four lane street at a later time.
Chrmn. Joos commented that he would be opposed to having
the houses front this type of street.
Comm. Kelly stated concern that where Eagle Creek Bluff
Avenue exists is not at a 90 degree angle, which may not
be appropriate for collector streets. He asked whether
there were any standards for horizontal curvature on
these streets.
The City Engineer stated there were standards and those
would be covered in the final design. He stated that the
applicants have not submitted a road design as of yet.
Dennis Griswold explained the smallest lot is .86 of an
acre. He stated that the traffic levels would be
balanced out with the large amount of green space and the
proposed park system.
Mr. Hutton explained that the City has no intention of
upgrading the existing Boiling Springs Lane, and
installing curb and gutter at this time. He stated that
the residents would need to petition for the upgrade and
the City Council would need to approve it on the five
year plan.
Randy Sauer, 9401 Boiling Springs Lane, stated that he
enjoyed the neighborhood as it was, stating there was no
need for police calls since they were a close knit
community who watched out for each other. He commented
that they did not want the street to go through and
connect with the new community moving in.
Mark Gilbertson, 9326 Boiling Springs Lane, stated that
he preferred the dead end street, which was also
sufficient for emergency vehicles and busses. He would
like for the area to remain a rural situation.
Ken Platt, 8615 Boiling Springs Lane, commented he did
not want any changes to occur.
Terry Pribble, 8963 Boiling Springs Lane, also commented
he did not want any changes to occur.
Julie Dugan, 9177 Boiling Springs Lane, commented that
their neighborhood is safe and did not want the further
traffic.
Ninths of the Page- 8
Shakopee Planning Commission December 9, 1993
John Pribble, 8963 Boiling Springs Lane, suggested that
the developer make a few lots larger and have a cul-de-
sac to create less traffic on the arterial streets. He
commented that with the new roads going in they could
have more assessments, curb and gutter, and sewer and
water.
The City Engineer explained where CR 18 would be
extending and where TH 101 would be connecting.
Bruce Gufford, 9130 Boiling Springs Lane, stated he
wanted no change.
Comm. Spurrier stated that the traffic report should have
included the triangular portion of the junction where the
two roads meet.
The City Planner gave a brief presentation on the new
highways, where they will connect, and the time frame for
construction. He stated that Boiling Springs Lane is
proposed to remain a local street.
John Pribble, 8963 Boiling Springs Lane, stated concern
that if the new road were put through, people would use
this road as a short cut to the highways.
Dennis Griswold stated that Savage's Planning Commission
and Council has looked at the Section 18 study and were
favorable towards it. He stated that all the proposed
houses would not even be built before CR 18 was redone.
He did not feel that traffic would route through the
development to this street for a short cut.
Clarence VanZee, President of VanZee Homes, stated that
they own about 4, 000 pine trees on another property and
would be bringing these in for screening. He asked the
Commission to give him an idea of whether they supported
the PUD or not. He stated the houses would be in the
$200, 000 range.
Chrmn. Joos stated he would support the PUD. Comm.
Spurrier agreed with the PUD. Comm. Zak agreed with the
PUD but did not feel there was an advantage to this
property to have the street going through. Comm. Kelly
liked the idea of the PUD, but thought it needed to be
reworked. Comm. Madigan agreed with the PUD, but was
concerned about traffic issues. Comm. Christensen liked
the PUD, but did not want to disrupt the existing
neighborhood.
Minutes of the Page- 9
Shakopee Planning troimmission
December 9, 1993
Motion: Comm. Christensen/Zak offered a motion to
continue the public hearing regarding the Application for
Approval of the Preliminary Development Plan for the
proposed Eagle Creek Bluff Planned Unit development to
the January 6, 1994, meeting.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously.
Motion: Comm. Christensen/Zak offered a motion to table
the recommendation to the City Council regarding the
Application for Approval of the Final Development Plan
for the proposed Eagle Creek Bluff Planned Unit
Development.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously.
VIII. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: TO CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY
PLAT OF EAGLE CREEK BLUFF ADDITION, LOCATED EAST OF CR 18
AND SOUTH OF BOILING SPRINGS LANE.
Motion: Comm. Christensen/Zak offered a motion to
continue the public hearing regarding the Application for
Approval of the Preliminary Plat for the proposed Eagle
Creek Bluff development to the January 6, 1994, meeting.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously.
ICATION
IX. PUBLIC CONDITIONAL U E PERMIT• T
TO ALLOW FILL TO CONSIDER AO BEL FOR
PLACED IN
AA
FLOODWAY IN HUBER PARK
Amy Wicklund, Planning Intern, stated that staff's
recommendation would be to continue the public hearing to
the January 6, 1994, meeting to allow time for further
review by the Department of Natural Resources.
Motion: Comm. Zak/Spurrier moved to continue the public
hearing regarding the Application for a Conditional Use
Permit to fill in a floodway to the February, 1994
meeting, or sooner if the DNR report arrives.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously.
X. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: TO CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY
PLAT OF PRAIRIE BEND, LYING ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EAST 4TH
AVENUE, SOUTH AND WEST OF THE K.C. HALL
The City Planner stated that the applicants are
this
erty to
le
requesting and that rtherenwas concern by the City Council
family,
il
fy,,
about this rezoning.
nates of the Page-10
Shakopee Planning Connni lion December 9, 1993
Mr. Jim Johnston, 14 Warner Circle, Chaska, stated they
have a new concept using the PUD with approximately 33
percent open space, and 30 percent of the single family
homes were taken out of the plan. The garden apartments
have been replaced with townhouses. North of 4th Avenue
to screen the development from the industrial zone, they
would propose one story four-plexes which would be used
as assisted living spaces for seniors. Instead of having
garages for these units, they would have community rooms.
The plan would also include some single family and multi-
family housing. He stated that there is a proposed site
by Merrill Company that would provide access out of the
single family housing area and would be compatible with
this plan. He stated that the driveways to the townhomes
would be privately maintained.
Comm. Spurrier asked for an idea of the housing styles
and what uses with the current zoning would be permitted
in the areas created outside.
The City Planner commented that this area is currently
zoned R-4 and in the mandatory PUD area. He stated that
this R-4 section does allow for single family housing as
a permitted use.
Mr. Johnston stated that this may not need to be rezoned.
The only issue they would be concerned about would be the
50 foot set back. They would prefer to have a 30 foot
setback. He asked to have their concept plan reviewed at
the December meeting of the City Council.
Chrmn. Joos stated he was impressed with the new plan.
Comm. Christensen liked the new plan. Comm. Spurrier
stated concern about buffering commercial and industrial
uses to the green space.
Bob Worthington, Merrill Realty, stated they would be
coming in to discuss their plans with staff as soon as
there is a consensus on the property being proposed by
Sienna Corporation.
Motion: Comm. Zak/Christensen offered a motion to
continue the public hearing regarding the Application for
Approval of the Preliminary Plat for the proposed Prairie
Bend subdivision to the February 3, 1994 , meeting.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously.
Nffimutes of thePage-11
ShakopeeCommission Planning December 9, 1993
XI. VACATION: TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF THE PORTION OF
PIERCE ST. BETWEEN 3RD AVE. AND 4TH AVE.
The City Engineer stated that the City Council referred
this issue to the Planning Commission. He stated that
the public hearing is set for January 4, 1994, to discuss
the options.
Dave Nummer, Staff Engineer, asked for a consensus on one
of the options to bring to the City Council, and to
review the chosen option to decide if it complies with
the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Nummer went over the five
options explaining each. He stated there was a
neighborhood meeting, but only two people were in
attendance. These people stated they wanted to push the
alley over to obtain more property.
Mr. Hutton stated that the parties who were present at
the meeting had previously violated driveway and building
permits. The City is withholding their Certificate of
Occupancy deposit until they meet the storm water plans
and landscaping requirements.
Comm. Spurrier stated he liked option 4 and would like
another motion that would suggest that the City Council
consider removing that part of Pierce from the vacation.
Motion: Comm. Spurrier/Zak offered a motion to recommend
that the City Council approve the vacation of Pierce
Street from 3rd Avenue to 4th Avenue, while reserving
utility easements.
Motion: Comm. Spurrier/Christensen offered a motion to
find the vacation of a portion of Pierce Street
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously.
Motion: Comm. Spurrier/Madigan moved to send a
recommendation to City Council that none of the right-of-
way, west of center line be vacated until the property
owner to the west brings their site into conformance with
current building permits and conditional use permits.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously.
C. 1994 BOAA AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULE
Motion: Motion approving the 1994 Meeting Schedule for
the Planning Commission and the Board of Adjustment and
Appeals.
Vote: Motion carried on the consent agenda.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 11: 50 p.m.
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE PLANNING COMMISSION
Special Session Shakopee, Minnesota December 16, 1993
MEMBERS PRESENT: Joos, Madigan, Kelly, Zak
MEMBERS ABSENT: Spurrier, Christensen, Mars
STAFF PRESENT: Lindberg Ekola, City Planner
Karen Marty, City Attorney
Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner
Lisa Anderson, Recording Secretary
I. ROLL CALL
Chrmn. Joos called the meeting to order at 6: 15 p.m. The
roll call was taken as noted above.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The City Attorney suggested changing 3c of the agenda
from the discussion regarding "Parking" to
"Administration and Enforcement". The agenda was
approved as amended.
III. 6: 00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS
TO CHAPTER 11, LAND USE REGULATION OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY
CODE.
Chrmn. Joos opened the public hearing. The City Attorney
stated that ZORC recommended that the Race Track District
be eliminated because it is heating up again. She stated
that staff is recommending that it be placed back in the
ordinance. She stated that most of the changes are made
to just clean up the language.
Comm. Zak stated his concern with noise in the Racetrack
District. The City Planner pointed out that there are
noise restrictions for the different types of racing and
the different times of the day the races occur. The City
Attorney also stated that a PUD and any other use is
going to be required to abide by performance standards.
The City Attorney also stated that she would check into
this matter more thoroughly.
Motion: Comm. Zak/Kelly offered a motion to accept the
Racetrack District, with the exception of Item B for
clarification.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously.
Minutes of the Page- 2,
Shakopee Planning Commission December 16, 1993
SHORELAND REGULATIONS
The City Attorney gave a brief summary of the staff
recommendations. She stated that changes were made to
keep things consistent with the other ordinances and to
clean up the language.
Comm. Madigan asked for clarification of the difference
between the Shoreland and Flood Plain Regulations. Ron
Beaty, 470 Pillsbury Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota,
approached the podium and stated the difference between
the two regulations.
Jon Albinson, 5240 Valley Industrial Boulevard, Shakopee,
Minnesota, stated a concern regarding the 1000 foot
setback for the Shoreland District. A lengthy discussion
was had regarding this matter. Jon Albinson asked
whether the City would consider adopting the previously
approved line as the continuation of our Shoreland
District line. The Planning Commission decided to
discuss this matter later after receiving clarification
from the DNR.
Comm. Spurrier took his chair on the Planning Commission
at 6: 57 p.m.
Jon Albinson asked the Planning Commission to consider
Subd. 7b, the minimum of three feet above the high water
level be changed to one or two feet instead. The City
Planner responded that this would need to be researched
more thoroughly.
Jon Albinson also asked the Planning Commission to
consider in Subd. 6, Design Standards, to change the lot
width from 125' to 100' .
Motion: Comm. Kelly/Zak offered a motion to table this
discussion regarding the Shoreland District until they
received additional information.
Vote: The motion carried unanimously.
FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT
The City Planner displayed a diagram of the Floodplain
District and explained some definitions. The City
Attorney stated that there were no major changes made to
this district.
Comm. Spurrier stated his concern that Valley Fair review
Minutes of the Page-
Shakopee Planning Commission
December 16, 1993
and comment on these revisions and suggested that this
discussion be postponed until Valley Fair has responded
to this matter.
Bob Sweeney, 506 South Holmes, Shakopee, Minnesota,
approached the podium and stated that he would not like
this matter delayed.
Motion: Comm. Kelly/Madigan offered a motion to accept
the Floodplain Overlay District without delaying the
process, but directed Staff to advise Valley Fair that
the process is underway.
Vote: Motion carried four to one, with Comm. Spurrier
voting against.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The City Planner and the City Attorney gave brief
summaries of the ZORC and Staff recommendations. Both
stated the changes are minimal.
Comm. Spurrier recommended under Subd. 6a Item 3-Grading
and Filling, that a specific inclusion for any work in
public right-of-way be added. There was a consensus from
the Planning Commission that this be added.
Jon Albinson stated on Page 138, Subd. C, that he is
concerned about disallowing steel in different types of
construction. He would like to see this clarified. He
also stated that on Page 140, Subd. 8, Landscaping, that
it be appropriate to look at industrial landscaping
requirements differently or modify the steps.
Ron Beaty approached the podium and stated that only 50
percent of the landscaping requirement can be met in
shrubbery. He suggested to the Planning Commission that
the observe what other communities have done.
Motion: Comm. Zak/Kelly offered a motion to approve the
performance standards, with the exceptions as noted.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously.
ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT
The City Attorney gave a thorough description of the
Minutes of the Page-
Shakopee Planning Commission December 16, 1993
Staff recommendations for this district. She stated that
a lot of the changes were to basically clean up the
language.
Comm. Spurrier commented regarding the word "decisions"
made throughout this district. He would like a time
limit be stated as to when a decision is to be made.
Comm. Zak agreed with these comments.
Bob Sweeney asked for clarification of what a 2 story
building was, and suggested to the Planning Commission
that a height limitation be added on page 202.
Motion: Comm. Madigan/Zak offered a motion to accept
the Administration and Enforcement section, with the
appropriate corrections.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously.
Motion: Comm. Zak/Madigan offered a motion to continue
this public hearing to January 6, 1994, at 6: 00 p.m.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9 :00 p.m.
3.
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 9, 1993
MEMBERS PRESENT: Joos, Madigan, Kelly, Zak, Christensen
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mars, Spurrier
STAFF PRESENT: Lindberg Ekola, City Planner
Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant Planner
Dave Hutton, City Engineer
Amy Wicklund, Planning Intern
Debra Zabel, Recording Secretary
ROLL CALL
Vice Chrmn. Kelly called the meeting to order at 7:35
p.m. Roll call was taken as noted above.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved as presented.
III. APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 4, 1993 MEETING MINUTES
The meeting minutes were approved as presented.
IV. RECOGNITION OF INTERESTED CITIZENS
Vice Chrmn. Kelly recognized anyone in the audience
wishing to speak on any item not on the agenda. There
was no response.
V. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR A 1'
VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK IN ORDER
TO ADD A SUN PORCH ONTO THE DWELLING AT 622 E. 7TH AVE:
Amy Wicklund, Planning Intern, provided an overview of
the application. She stated that the structure will
' variance since
forualwesternrequire
lot2line. She stated that the
structure
for thethatthe applicant
is proposing the addition of the sun porch along the
existing building line of the home.
James Plekkenpol, applicant, stated he would ke to
He
enhance his property by building the sun porch.
stated that they would abide by all criteria set forth by
the board and staff.
Motion: Comm. Zak/Joos moved to close the public
hearing.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously.
Minim of the Page- 2
Board of Adjustment and Appeals December 9, 1993
Motion: Comm. Zak/Joos offered Variance Resolution No.
PC-675, A Resolution Granting a 2 Foot Variance to the
Required 10 Foot Minimum Side Yard Setback in the Urban
Residential (R-2) Zoning District, and moved its
adoption.
Vote: Motion carried unanimously.
VI. OTHER BUSINESS
Vice Chrmn. Kelly asked if there was any other business
to discuss. There was no response from the Board.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
TENTATIVE AGENDA
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
Regular Session Shakopee, MN January 6, 1994
Chairperson William Mars Presiding
1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M.
2 . Approval of Agenda
3 . Approval of December 9 , 1993 , Meeting Minutes
4 . Recognition by Board of Adjustment and Appeals of Interested
Citizens.
5. 7 : 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for a
variance from the minimum lot width requirement of 150 feet
within the Rural Residential Zoning District in order to
develop lots on a cul-de-sac within the proposed Riverview
Estates 2nd Addition.
Applicant: Scott County Farms
Action: Resolution No. 678
6. Other Business
a.
b.
7 . Adjourn
Lindberg S. Ekola
City Planner
NOTE TO THE B.O.A.A. MEMBERS:
1. If you have any questions or need additional information on any of the above items, please call Terrie
or Aggie on the Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting.
2. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting.
TENTATIVE AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Adjourned Regular Session Shakopee, MN January 6, 1994
Chairperson Terry Joos Presiding
1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M.
2 . Approval of Agenda
3 . Approval of the November 30, December 2 , 9 and 16, 1993 ,
Meeting Minutes
4 . Recognition by Planning Commission of Interested Citizens.
5. Approval of Consent Agenda - (All items listed with an
asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Planning
Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be
no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so
requests, in which event the item will be removed from the
consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the
agenda. )
6 . 7 : 35 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider the
preliminary and final development plans for the Eagle Creek
Bluff Addition Planned Unit Development, located east of CR 18
and south of Boiling Springs Lane.
Applicant: VanZee Homes, Inc.
7 . 7 : 40 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider the
preliminary plat of Eagle Creek Bluff Addition, located east
of CR 18 and south of Boiling Springs Lane.
Applicant: VanZee Homes, Inc.
8 . 7 : 45 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for a
Conditional Use Permit from Murray Williamson and Associates,
Inc. for a 65 unit Holiday Inn Express Motel, to be located
south of the Eagle Creek Plaza, north of the Super 8 Motel,
and east of CR 17 .
Applicant: Murray Williamson and Associates
Action: Resolution No. 676
9 . 7: 50 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for a
Conditional Use Permit to locate a church within the Mid-
Density Residential Zoning District. The site is located
south of Vierling Drive, adjacent to Emerald Lane.
Applicant: Calvery United Methodist Church
Action: Resolution No. 677
10. 7 : 55 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the preliminary plat of
Riverview Estates 2nd Addition, located at the northeast
corner of the intersection of County Rd. 18 and County Rd. 16.
Applicant: Scott County Farms
11. 8 : 00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the preliminary plat
for Orleans Addition, to be located east of CR 17, and south
of Hillside Drive.
Applicant: J. Patrick Leavitt, Jr.
12 . 8 : 05 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider a Registered Land
Survey (R.L. S. ) for Mr. Don McKush, located east of CR 17 and
west of CR 83 .
Applicant: Don McKush
13 . VACATION: To consider the vacation of the remainder of the
alley within the block south of 2nd Avenue between Holmes
Street and Lewis Street.
Applicant: City of Shakopee
14 . Other Business
A. Land Acquisition Review - Water Storage Facility
CR 16 & CR 18 (tabled from the December meeting)
15 . Adjourn
Lindberg S. Ekola
City Planner
NOTE TO PLANNING MEMBERS:
1. If you have any questions or need additional information on any of the above items, please call Terrie
or Aggie on the Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting at 445-3650.
2. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting.
4+3
NEWS RELEASE
1o �
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Linda Henning
(612) 229-3279
MWCC RELEASES CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR
ST. PAUL, December 22, 1993 -- The Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission (MWCC) Board of Commissioners on Tuesday voted to
terminate the appointment and employment of Chief Administrator
Gordon Voss, citing the need for a change in leadership at the
agency.
The Board is in the process of appointing an Acting Chief
Administrator until a full-time replacement is hired.
MWCC Chair Lou Clark said the agency is entering a period of
transition and the Board felt a change in leadership would be
beneficial to meet future needs .
"With all the changes, challenges and opportunities facing the
MWCC now and in the coming years, the Board determined that new
operational leadership would help assure that the agency would
continue to meet its mission, " Clark said.
"I commend Gordon Voss for his five years of public service
and commitment to the agency. The decision was made because overall
the Board felt it was time for a change. "
The MWCC Board will begin the process of recruiting a new
Chief Administrator immediately. The top candidate will be selected
by these criteria: leadership, professional experience, proven
(more)
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre,230 East Fifth Street,St.Paul.MN 55101 612 222-8423
EO 1M1T
INK Printed on recycled paper,15%post-consumer
MWCC RELEASES CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR. . . /2
administrative capabilities and commitment to public service . A
national search will be conducted to assure that the final
selection is drawn from a field of highly qualified candidates,
meets the immediate needs of the agency and provides strong
leadership to the agency into the next century.
The MWCC owns and operates the regional wastewater collection
and treatment system in the metropolitan Twin Cities area. MWCC' s
10 treatment plants process 300 million gallons of sewage every
day, providing sewer service for more than two million area
residents. Agency policies are established by a Board of
Commissioners who represent geographic precincts within the seven-
county metropolitan area.
(30)
LI
3490 Lexington Avenue North
St. Paul,MN 55126
League of Minnesota Cities (612)490-5600
December 13, 1993
Dear City Manager/Administrator/Clerk:
As many of you have new mayors and/or councilmembers taking
office on January 1, it is important they learn the "how-to' s",
"can-do's", and "can't-do' s" involved in running city government.
For an in-depth overview and training session, the League has
scheduled a one-day Conference for Newly Elected Officials. The
conference will be held on Saturday, February 5, at the Sheraton
Inn Midway in St. Paul . With the complexities city officials
face in personal liability and conflict of interest, the open
meeting law and data practices act, what councils can and cannot
do, personnel and labor relations, planning, budgeting,
THIS CONFERENCE IS A MUST!
Along with a brochure describing the Conference for Newly Elected
Officials is a brochure outlining three pre-conference seminars
offered by Government Training Service (GTS) and Women in City
Government . These programs are conveniently scheduled on Friday,
February 4 at the same hotel .
We encourage your city officials to attend any (or all ! ) of these
special programs . They include seminars titled "Resolving
Conflicts: Options for Mutual Gain and Enhancing Your City' s
Response to Citizens, " presented by GTS and "Stress Reduction
Through Time Management" sponsored by Women in City Government.
These seminars would benefit both incumbents and newly elected
officials . The enclosed brochures detail the three sessions .
We would appreciate your assistance in distributing these
brochures to your city officials .
On behalf of the League of Minnesota Cities and Government
Training Service, we send you our very best wishes for the new
year.
Sincerely,
.. /
Li 'James F. Miller Helene Johnson
Executive Director Executive Director
League of Minnesota Cities Government Training Service
BUSINESS UPDATE FROM CITY HALL
Vol. 8 No. 1
Dear Chamber Member: January 1, 1994
Administration program will focus on assistance to improve
substandard rental units.
A new character generator has been installed in City
Hall. This equipment allows the City to communicate Park and Recreation
with Shakopee residents via the Government Access
Cable TV channel 12. Announcements regarding City On December 7th the Shakopee City Council agreed to
programs and activities are updated daily. Funding for allocated $5,000.00 from the Park Reserve Fund to
the equipment was provided by the Shakopee Public install lights around the former Hockey Bubble Ice
Access Corporation. Rink. The Shakopee/Prior Lake Hockey Association is
also contributing $5,000.00 to offset project costs.
City Clerk
The Shakopee Community Education and Parks and
On December 7th City Council approved a tattoo Recreation Winter Broachure will be mailed to all
School District residents on December 28 and 29. The
license for Linda Kurian, 1st in Hair and brochure will include a complete listing of all
Tanning/Body Art, 205 So. Lewis. City Council also
community recreation and education programs
approved a premises permit for pull-tab for the Prior
available to Shakopee resdients. Extra copies are
Lake Lions Club at Canterbury Inn.
available at School District offices, 505 south Holmes
On December 21st City Council adopted the fee
Street and at City Hall, 129 So. Holmes Street.
schedule for 1994 for all permits and licenses. A few Planning
fees were increased to cover cost of expenses.
Community Development At their December 9, 1993, regular meeting, the
Shakopee Planning Commission reopened the public
On December 21, 1993 the Shakopee HRA approved the hearing to consider amendments to Conditional Use
Permit No. 376 for Mineral Extraction and Land
Downtown Rehab Grant program amendments. The Rehabilitation on the property located east of CR 18,
intent of the program is to stimulate downtown south of CR 83, and north of Valley View Road. The
building improvements that are consistent with the permit was originally issued to NBZ Enterprises. The
Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The new program applicants, representatives of Fischer Aggregates, Inc.,
guidelines require the use of an architect. made presentations about their proposal and fielded
questions from the Commissioners and the public. The
City Council continued discussions regarding the Planning Commission continued the public hearing
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission agreement until after the Zoning Ordinance Review is completed.
and the Chaska intercepter. Estimated costs for the
City to connect to this sewer line that will service areas The Planning Commission reopened the public hearing
South of the Southerly bypass range between $3.4 and to consider the preliminary and final development
$5 million. This issue will again be discussed at a plans for the Eagle Creek Bluff Addition Planned Unit
Committee of the Whole meeting scheduled for January Development, proposed to be located east of CR 18 and
11th. south of Boiling Springs Lane. The applicant, VanZee
Homes, Inc., provided additional information and
On December 21, 1993 the Shakopee HRA directed staff responded to questions from the Commissioners and
and the CDC to develop a housing assistance program the public. After voicing approval for developing this
modeled after the Rehab Grant Program. The
site under the Planned Unit Development process, the selected topics.
Planning Commission continued the public hearing to
its January 6, 1994, meeting. The public hearing The Shakopee Police Department will be working with
regarding the preliminary plat for this proposed the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms by
addition was also reopened and continued to the providing information on firearms recovered in
January meeting. connection with violent crimes involving juveniles or
firearms recovered in a school zone. The purpose of
The Commission reopened the public hearing regarding this joint initiative is to reduce the frequency of violent
the preliminary plat of Prairie Bend, located on the crimes involving juveniles, identify the sources of guns
south side of East 4th Avenue, south and west of the obtained by juveniles, and apprehend and prosecute
K.C. Hall. The applicant presented revised plans that adults who violate firearms laws by illegally trafficking
addressed concerns voiced earlier by staff, Planning firearms to juveniles.
Commissioners, and City Councilors. After voicing
encouragement for the concept of this project, the
Public Works\Engineering
Planning Commission continued the public hearing to
its February 3, 1994, meeting.
The City Council recently ordered the construction of
The Planning Commission continued the public hearing sidewalks along the east side of Marschall Road, from
for Conditional Use Permit No. 663, to allow fill to be 4th Avenue to 10th Avenue. Also included in this
placed in the Floodway in Huber Park, until the project is the extension of the sidewalk on 10th Avenue
February 3, 1994, meeting, or sooner if review from between Polk St. and the Shakopee Town Square Mall.
the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources The Engineering Department will be designing this
becomes available. project over the winter.
The Commission tabled the Official Mapping/Land Other projects currently under design include the final
Acquisition for a water storage facility proposed to be phase of the Downtown Streetscape Project (1st Ave)
located at CR 16 and CR 18 until its January meeting. and the downtown alley reconstruction and electrical
The Commission found a Land Acquisition for another undergrounding project. These projects will be
water storage facility proposed to be located on Lots 1 designed and bid for 1994 construction.
and 2, Block 1, Maple Trails Estates 1st Addition to be
in compliance with the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan. The department is currently preparing feasibility
studies for various other projects including llth Ave.
The Planning Commission met on December 16, 1993, storm sewers (new Harrison St.) and an extension of
to continue the Zoning Ordinance review process. The Vierling Drive from Adams St. (C.R. 15) to the
Commission has reviewed the introduction, definitions, Shakopee Town Square.
zoning districts, zoning map, overlay districts,
performance standards, signs, and the administration In regards to construction, most projects are currently
and enforcement sections of the Zoning Ordinance. shut down for the winter. Two projects that will
The parking, conditional use provisions, and continue to be worked on all winter fare the Upper
nonconformities sections are scheduled to be reviewed Valley Drainage Project and the VIP Sewer extension.
on January 6, 1994, from 6:00 to 7:30 p.m. The Upper Valley Drainage project also consists of
several storm sewer connections from the Shakopee
Police Bypass. The VIP Sewer Interceptor project includes a
forcemain from Rahr Malting, through the prison
For the second time; Shakopee Police asked local property, Sweeney School and Lion's Park.
citizens to join them at Police Academy. This is an The Public Works Department recently installed a
opportunity for citizens to share with us what they feel computerized fuel management system.
the community is looking for in their police
department, and a chance for the department to share On a personal note, we would like to congratulate Jeff
their ideas and information on current programs. The and Claire Swenson on the arrival of their new son,
Academy includes a tour of the police department and Nicholas Andrew.
information from records, patrol, training, and
administration,a DWI demonstration and discussion of
January 1994 ,I4
Upcoming Meetings
SUM MOH TUE WED THU FRI SAT
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
4:30pm Public 7:00pm City 6:00pm ZORC
Utilities Council Meeting
7:30pm Planning
Commission
g 10 11 12 13 14 15
7:00pm
Committee of
the Whole
16 1? 18 19 20 21 22
City Hall Closed 7:00pm City 5:00pm CDC
- Martin L. Council 7:00pm Energy
King and
Transportation
23 24 25 26 2? 28 29
7:00pm Park &
Recreation
1
30 3 1 December 1993 February 1994
SMTWTFS SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
26 27 28 29 30 31 27 28
12/23/1993
test
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT
FOR
DECEMBER, 1993
Respectfully Submitted
471
David E. Hutton, P.E.
Public Works Director
PROJECT START COMPLETE STATUS COMMENTS
Category I- Projects Under Construction
1. Minibypass 5/93 7/1/94 90% Mn/DOT Project
2. Valley Park 11th 7/93 7/1/94 90% Wear Course Asphalt Remaining
3. Upper Valley Drainage 9/93 7/29/94 70% See Narrative Section
4. 1993 Street Reconstruction 8/93 6/15/94 40% See Narrative Section
5. VIP Interceptor 10/93 Done 95% Testing Pipe Yet
6. Rahr Forcemain 10/93 Done 100% Testing Pipe Yet
7. Murphy's Landing Lift Station 10/1/93 Done 100%
8. Brambilla's Storm Sewer 10/1/93 Done 100%
Category II- Projects in Design
1. Rahr Service Line 7/93 Done 100% Will Bid in 1994. No Rahr Agreement Yet
2. Public Works Parking Lot 1/94 3/94 0%
3. Downtown Alleys 6/93 3/94 40% Waiting on SPUC's Electrical Consultant
4. Parking Lot(Old Gene Brown) 1/94 3/94 0% Will Design with Alleys
5. Downtown Streetscape II 1/94 4/94 0% Waiting on Survey Work
6. Alley- Block 48 1/94 4/94 0% Waiting on Survey Work
7. Marschall Rd./10th Ave. Sidewalk 1/94 3/94 0% Waiting on Survey Work
Category III - Projects Under Study
1. St. Francis Sewer/Water 7/93 3/94 30% Waiting on Watermain Input from SPUC
2. Pierce St. Vacation 10/93 12/93 100% Public Hearing 1/18/94
3. P. &V. Addition (Jackson Township) 11/93 1/26/94 60%
4. 11th Ave. Storm Laterals 11/93 2/94 50%
5. C.S.A.H. 18 Connection 11/93 4/94 0%
6. Vierling Drive, 12/93 3/94 0%
C.R. 15 to Polk Street
7. Traffic Analysis to Mall 9/93 8/94 0%
Category IV - Private Subdivision Construction
1. Beckrich Estates 1992 6/94 95% New Entrance off C.R. 78 Not Completed
2. Meadows 8th 5/93 6/94 85% Finish in 1994
3. Milwaukee Manor 6/93 9/94 90% Wear Course in 1994
4. Maple Trails 6/93 9/94 25% Finish in 1994
5. Dominion Hills 6/93 9/94 25% Finish in 1994
6. Stonebrooke 2nd Unknown Unknown 0%
7. Parkview 1st 7/93 8/94 85% Wear Course in 1994
8. Meadows 9th 10/93 9/94 80% Utilities Completed
9. Westridge Bay 2nd 10/93 9/94 25% Finish in 1994
1
PROJECT START COMPLETE STATUS COMMENTS
Category V - Special Projects
1. Huber Park Grading Permit 5/93 3/94 90% Will go to Planning Commission
in February
2. Maras Street 1990 ??? 90% City Attorney Working on
Last 2 Easements
3. In-House Engineering Concept 4/94 7/94 0% Will Prepare with 1995 Budget
4. Prior Lake Outlet Channel 2/93 8/94 0%
5. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan 1992 4/94 95% Waiting on Final Chaska
Interceptor Negotiations
6. Comprehensive Stormwater 2/93 4/94 90% Draft Plan Completed
Management Plan
Please refer to the attached narrative section for a more detailed discussion on several of the projects.
2
NARRATIVE SECTION
Category 1 - Projects Under Construction
3 . Upper Valley Drainage Project - Phase II and Shakopee Bypass
Drainage Facilities
The mainline drainageway has been rough graded and is
about 60% completed. Storm sewer Segments 1, 3 , 4 and 6
are about 90% completed. Segments 2 and 5 are not part
of this contract, but under Mn/DOT contract .
4 . Street Reconstruction Projects (Spencer Street, 8th Avenue,
4th Avenue, Naumkeag Street, Fillmore Street and Atwood
Street)
The temporary asphalt has been installed on Spencer
Street and Fillmore Street . The sidewalks on Spencer
Street will not get completed this year due to the
weather. All further work has been suspended on this
project until next year.
5. V.I.P. Interceptor Extension
All pipe installation is completed. All pipe is
currently undergoing leak detection testing.
6 . Rahr Forcemain
All pipe installation is completed. All pipe is
currently undergoing leak detection testing.
Category No. 2 - Projects in Design
1. Rahr Malting Inverted Siphon (Service Line)
All design work been completed. The final agreement with
Rahr Malting have still not been executed. Staff has
requested prices from the VIP contractor to add this as
a change order. Based on these prices, staff is
recommending that this project be bid out in 1994 .
3
3 . Downtown Alley Reconstruction and Undergrounding Electric
Lines
The design of this project will need to be coordinated
with Shakopee Public Utilities . All field survey work
has been completed and design has started. The pavement
reconstruction portion will be designed in-house, while
the electrical design will be done by Shakopee Public
Utilities Commission' s consultant . Construction of this
project has been postponed until 1994 .
Category 3 - Projects Under Study
1. St. Francis Hospital Sewer and Water
The sewer portion has been completed and staff is still
waiting on the watermain information from Shakopee Public
Utilities .
Category 5 - Special Projects
2 . Maras Street Easements
All easements for the street have been obtained and
recorded except two properties . The City Attorney is
continuing to work towards obtaining the remaining
easements . (No change in status)
3 . Total In-House Engineering Concept
During the 1994 budget process, the City Council directed
staff to prepare a proposal on what it would take to be
a completely self-sufficient Engineering Department (i .e.
no consultants, staff equipment and furnishings needed) .
Staff has not prepared this study yet . This report will
be prepared in 1994 , for the 1995 budget discussion.
4
4 . Improvements to the Prior Lake Outlet Channel
The Watershed District has not submitted any proposed
improvements to this channel . They have directed their
consultant to prepare a study on this . Staff has not
received any proposals from the Watershed District .
5. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan (Consultant)
The draft report is done . The final report is being
postponed until the final decision involving the Chaska
Interceptor cost sharing agreement .
6 . Comprehensive City-Wide Stormwater Management Plan
(Consultant)
The draft report has been submitted to staff for review.
5
*5
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DECEMBER 30, 1993
Part I.
Start Complete Status Comments
Administration
1. 1994- 1998 CIP 4/1 10/19 100% Final draft being distributed
2. 1994 Budget 4/1 12/1 100% CC approved
3. J-Term Intern 1/3 1/28 0% Candidate selected
Lone Range
1. Chaska Int. Agreement 6/1 2/1/94 95% Draft agreement review
2. Chaska Int. Conditions 7/1 2/1/95 20% Rural Density, MUSA
Comp Plan policies research
3. Land Use Plan 3/1 3/1/94 50% On hold
4. East Shak. Trans Plan 1/1 3/1/94 25% On hold for land use decision
5. Zoning Ord. Update 6/1 2/8/94 80% Planning Commission reviewing draft
Current Planning
1. Building Permits 12/1 12/29 Ongoing 33 Residential permits
1 Commercial permits
0 Industrial permits
2. Planning Reports 12/1 12/30 Ongoing 1 Variances
0 Appeals of CA
2 CUP
2 Plats
2 PUD
0 Rezoning
1 Vacations
0 Minor Subdivisions
2 Official Map Reviews
3. Enforcement 12/1 12/30 Ongoing 0 Complaints
5 Code Violations (Zoning)
2 Resolved Violations
Management Information Systems (MIS)
1. Special Assessment Software 4/1 12/30 100% Complete
2. LAN Schematics/Doc. 8/1 12/30 100% Complete
3. PC Maintenance Tracking 8/15 12/30 100% Complete
4. Install New Tape Backup 12/1 2/1 50% Delivered
5. GIS Stage One 10/01 10/01/94 1% Initial meeting held
6. PC Hardware Upgrade 11/9 1/15 90% Installation in progress
7. Install File Server 11/9 2/1 50% Delivered
(WP51\DOCS AMY\PROGRESS.nec) 12/30/93
Part IL MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
NARRATIVE
Prior to their regular December 9, 1993, Planning Commission meeting time, members of the Shakopee Planning
Commission attended a 30 minute seminar on residential densities. The subject was raised in conjunction with the
Commission's ongoing review of the Zoning Ordinance.
At their regular meeting on December 9, 1993, the Shakopee Board of Adjustment and Appeals approved a two foot
variance from the required ten foot side yard setback for James and June Plekkenpol of 622 East 7th Avenue to allow the
applicants to build a sun porch addition to theft house.
At their December 9, 1993,regular meeting, the Shakopee Planning Commission reopened the public hearing to consider
amendments to Conditional Use Permit No. 376 for Mineral Extraction and Land Rehabilitation on the property located
east of CR 18, south of CR 83, and north of Valley View Road. The permit was originally issued to NBZ Enterprises.
The applicants, representatives of Fischer Aggregates, Inc., made presentations about their proposal and fielded questions
from the Commissioners and the public. The Planning Commission continued the public hearing until after the Zoning
Ordinance Review is completed.
The Planning Commission reopened the public hearing to consider the preliminary and final development plans for the
Eagle Creek Bluff Addition Planned Unit Development, proposed to be located east of CR 18 and south of Boiling Springs
Lane. The applicant, VanZee Homes, Inc., provided additional information and responded to questions from the
Commissioners and the public. After voicing approval for developing this site under the Planned Unit Development
process, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing to its January 6, 1994, meeting. The public hearing
regarding the preliminary plat for this proposed addition was also reopened and continued to the January meeting.
The Commission reopened the public hearing regarding the preliminary plat of Prairie Bend, located on the south side of
East 4th Avenue, south and west of the K.C. Hall. The applicant presented revised plans that addressed concerns voiced
earlier by staff, Planning Commissioners, and City Councilors. After voicing encouragement for the concept of this
project, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing to its February 3, 1994, meeting.
The Planning Commission found the proposed vacation of the portion of Pierce Street between 3rd and 4th Avenues to be
consistent with the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission recommended option four from the
feasibility study to the City Council. Option four calls for vacating the street, but creating an alley on the north half of
the street that would connect the existing east-west alley to 3rd Avenue. The Planning Commission further recommended
that the vacation of Pierce Street not be processed until the owner of Lots 6 to 9,Block 42 and the north half of the vacated
east-west alley has met all the requirements of the property's Conditional Use and Building Permits.
The Planning Commission continued the public hearing for Conditional Use Permit No. 663, to allow fill to be placed in
the Floodway in Huber Park, until the February 3, 1994, meeting, or sooner if review from the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources becomes available. The Commission tabled the Official Mapping/Land Acquisition for a water
storage facility proposed to be located at CR 16 and CR 18 until its January meeting. The Commission found a Land
Acquisition for another water storage facility proposed to be located on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Maple Trails Estates 1st
Addition to be in compliance with the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan. Finally,the Commission approved the 1994 Meeting
Schedule for the Board of Adjustment and Appeals and the Planning Commission.
The Planning Commission met on December 16, 1993,to continue the Zoning Ordinance review process. The Commission
has reviewed the introduction, definitions, zoning districts, zoning map, overlay districts, performance standards, signs,
and the administration and enforcement sections of the Zoning Ordinance. The parking, conditional use permits, and
nonconformities sections are scheduled to be reviewed on January 6, 1994, from 6:00 to 7:30 p.m.
No more curled pages: a plain paper fax is in place in City Hall. Several happy public servants are using upgraded
computers with faster processors and color monitors. Additional printers have been delivered and will soon be installed.
Internal E-mail is here to stay. A new file server with larger tape backup has arrived. Final training for FMS/AC software
has been held. As always, daily trouble shooting continues.
(W?S1%IXCSIAMn?ROGRfiss.Dsc)12/30/93
* 10
Monthly Project Report - Submitted by Barry Stock
December 30, 1993
Project Start Complete Status Comments
1 . Clinic RFP' s ? ? 0%
2 . AWAIR Program ? ? 0%
3 . Perform Employee 1/1 ? 0%
Evaluations
4 . Rehab Grant Program 5/4 12/1 100%
Amendments
5 . City Hall Mtg. Room 9/1 9/7 90%
Policy
6 . P.W. Union Contract 9/1 12/7 100%
7 . City Hall Union Contr. 10/15 12/21 50%
8 . Non-union 94 Pay Plan 12/1 12/21 80%
9 . City Hall Elevator 12/15 1/15 90%
Maint . RFP' s
10 . City of Shakopee Bldg. 11/1 12/15 80%
Maint . RFP' s
11 . Pesonnel Policy 12/1 1/31 80%
Amendments
12 . City Newsletter 1/1 4/1 0%
Development
13 . Sr. Planner Selection 1/1 2/1 25%
14 . Bldg. Usage Policy 12/1 1/15 90%
15 . Downtown Utlities 12/1 8/15 0%
16 . Housing Program 1/1 4/15 0%
Development
17 . TIF Plan Amendments 12/15 3/1 5%
Other Comments
The Recreation Dept. workload is as projected. The Winter Program
brochure is being completed.
TENTATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 4, 1994
LOCATION: 129 Holmes Street South
Mayor Gary Laurent presiding
Oath of Office by Newly Elected Officials
1] Roll Call at 7: 00 P.M.
2] Council Meeting Objectives and Procedures
3] Appointments to Housing & Redevelopment Authority - Res. 3930
4] Approval of Agenda
5] Recess for H.R.A. Meeting
6] Re-convene
7] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers
8] Mayor's Report
9] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS
10] Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an
asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council
and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember
so requests, in which event the item will be removed from
the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence
on the agenda. )
11] Approval of Minutes of December 7, 1993
12] Communications:
a] Bill Koniarski, Chair, Scott County Transportation
Coalition regarding Minnesota highway system in crisis '
13] Informational Hearing on sidewalk improvements along
Marschall Road from 4th to 10th and along 10th Avenue
from Tyler to the Mall
14] Boards and Commissions:
a] Sienna Corporation request for rezoning and deletion of
mandatory PUD for property lying South of 4th Ave. and
South and West of KC Hall (Lenzmeier property)
TENTATIVE AGENDA
January 4, 1994
Page -2-
15] Reports from Staff:
*a] Official Newspaper
b] Canterbury Downs Letter of Credit - See HRA item #5
c] Street Light at Vierling Drive & Marschall Road - tabled
12/7
*d] Infiltration and Inflow Study
*e] Nominations to Boards and Commissions
*f] Interfund Transfers
*g] Bids for Full Size Squad Car
*h] Purchase of 1994 Compact Pickup
*i] Bids for Suburban (Fire Dept)
*j ] Purchase of Computer Bridge
*k] Approve Bills in the Amount of $261, 737. 33
1] 1994 Liaison Appointments
*m] Shakopee Senior Graduation Party, Inc.
16] Resolutions and Ordinance:
*a] Res. No. 3931 - Apportionment of Special Assessments for
Milwaukee Manor First Addition
*b] Res. No. 3932 - Appointment of Special Assessments for
The Meadows 9th Addition
*c] Res. No. 3935 - Authorizing Execution of Proxy for The
Minnesota Municipal Money Market (4M)
Fund
*d] Res. No. 3936 - Requesting Use of A Scott County Building
for Police Training
17] Other Business:
a]
b)
c]
d]
18]_ Recess for an Executive Session to discuss matters covered
under the attorney-client privilege
19] Re-convene
20] Adjourn to Tuesday, January 18, 1994 at 7 : 00 P.M.
Dennis R. Kraft
City Administrator
REMINDER:
Jan. 11th - Committee of the Whole at 7: 00 P.M.
Jan. 26th - Jackson Township Meeting at 7: 00 P.M.
MEMO TO: City Council, City Administrator and Department Directors
FROM: Gary L. Laurent, Mayor
RE: Council Meeting Objectives and Procedures
DATE: December 27, 1993
It is my belief we can best serve the interests of our City by
conducting Council meetings in a fashion which accomplishes the
meeting objectives outlined below. Although it is a major duty of
the Mayor to bring order and direction to meetings the
responsibility for process is shared with Council and staff .
I propose that a workshop session be scheduled within the next 6
weeks so that Council programs and goals for 1994 can be discussed.
Although I consider all of the items outlined in this memo open for
discussion at the workshop meeting, I believe it important "start
on the right foot" . Therefore, I ask your support in immediately
implementing those procedures herein outlined. Most probably fall
under Mayoral prerogative and are in fact a matter of style. All
are intended to be beneficial to our common concerns .
MEETING OBJECTIVES:
Although all incumbent Council members received a memo from me on
this subject last year, I believe a review of procedures will be
beneficial not only to Councilor Dirks, but to everyone. While not
necessarily a complete list of meeting objectives, the following
were considered when proposing certain meeting procedures .
Meetings should (in no order of importance) :
- Be concise
- Be understandable (by Councilmembers, staff, recording
secretary, attenders, the press and TV audience
- Be accountable (to the citizens being represented)
- Be open to public input
- Allow ample opportunity for discussion and fair representation
of all ideas and opinions
- Encourage staff input of material fact and staff conclusions
- Enhance the image of the City
- Be respectful to all people
- Conduct the business of the City with the interests of the
overall community guiding the decision making process .
MEETING PROCEDURES:
Some of the following are recommended changes while many others are
reiteration of previously adopted procedures where stronger
adherence is sought . I am recommending that we :
- Limit the "Liaison Reports" section of the agenda to just
liaison reports
- Have "Other Business" a regular part of every agenda
- Have "Mayor' s Report" as a regular part of every agenda
- Allow the audience to speak to the consent agenda regarding
the removal of an item from consent
- Generally maintain stricter adherence to parliamentary
procedure (but not absolute! )
- Enforce that only those having the floor as recognized by the
chair shall speak
- Encourage both audience and Councilmembers to address the
chair
- Encourage that motions be descriptive of action sought 1 .e .
not simply "move the requested action" .
- Make a stronger effort to make motions only in the affirmative
- Allow any member to make modifications to a motion, if
acceptable to the maker, but only, prior to the start of
discussion as signalled by the chair; (After discussion has
begun a motion can be altered only be a successful motion to
amend)
- Disallow discussion on a motion until seconded.
- Generally allow the member who makes a motion to be given the
first opportunity to speak on that motion.
- Generally recognize any member who has not spoken on a
question over one who has
- Discourage cumbersome, lengthy and numerous amendments to a
motion
- Rule against explanation of vote by members during voting
- Delete "automatic" roll call votes
- Declare a unanimous vote if a motion receives any votes on one
side and none on the other
- Generally, report by the chair the results of all votes
indicating those members in the majority
- Delete the need for motions for minor actions which can be
handled more informally by general or unanimous consent
- Make every effort to be protective of staff, Council and
citizens from personal or unnecessarily derogatory attacks
CONSENT AGENDA:
If Councilmembers desire to abstain on a particular item on the
consent agenda they can inform the chair that they will be voting
on the consent agenda, but that they want minutes to show that they
have abstained on a particular item.
CONCLUSION:
I will focus most of my attention during meetings on the process of
the meeting itself . I still, however, will need your assistance in
maintaining proper meeting procedure. That is our challenge . It' s
easy to drift away.
Please do not take my enforcement of procedure personally and
please let me know (preferably after the meeting) if you think I
was out of line .
Please also discuss with me any ideas or comments you may have for
the way meetings are run.
The contents of this memo will be discussed at our meeting on
January 4 , 1994 . However, if you have a major concern about any of
the above, please contact me prior to the meeting for explanation
and discussion.
"I really believe we are doing a good job following the above
procedures. I would like to thank each of you for your help in
making our Council meetings something to be proud of . "
REQUESTED ACTION:
1 . Endorse Council Meeting Objectives and Procedures as outline,
or;
2 . Amend and endorse Council Meeting Objectives and Procedures .
TENTATIVE AGENDA
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
Annual Meeting January 4 , 1994
Oath of Office by New Officials
1 . Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M.
2 . Approval of the December 7, 1993 meeting minutes
3 . Election of Officers
4 . Statement of Interests in Real Estate
5 . Canterbury Downs Letter of Credit
6 . Other Business
a)
b)
7 . Adjourn
Dennis R. Kraft
Executive Director
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 7, 1993
Chrmn. Beard called the meeting to order at 7 : 07 PM with
Commissioners : Vierling, Lynch, Sweeney and Mayor Laurent present .
Also present : Dennis Kraft, City Administrator; Barry Stock, Asst
City Administrator; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; Karen Marty, City
Attorney; Dave Hutton, Public Works Director, and Judith S . Cox,
City Clerk.
Sweeney/Lynch moved approval of the November 3rd & 18th, 1993
Minutes . Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Kraft explained that Jacobs Realty would like to secure
approval for substituting the Jacobs Realty letter of credit for
the Ladbroke letter of credit which guarantees the payment of
property taxes for Canterbury Downs through 1995 . He stated that
the closing date was to be December 15th, however, there is
litigation pending at this time . Mr. Kraft stated that the other
provisions the city had with Ladbroke should be continued on with
this agreement .
Mr. Jacobs stated that there is a possibility to close on December
15th, but they wanted to come before the HRA to make sure they
satisfied the replacement letter of credit .
Sweeney/Lynch moved to indicate to Jacobs Realty that the Shakopee
Housing and Redevelopment Authority is willing to consider the
replacement of the Ladbroke letter of credit with one from Jacobs
Realty, Inc . provided that all of the applicable conditions in the
original agreement with ladbroke Corporation be met by Jacobs
Realty Inc. and further that this letter of credit be substituted
only after the successful closing of the real estate transaction
for Canterbury Downs between Jacobs Realty, Inc. and Ladbroke
Racing Corporation (New Canterbury Downs) . Motion carried
unanimously.
Mr. Stock explained that the Park & Recreation Advisory Board has
been discussing options for funding park improvements. He
explained that the existing tax increment financing plan does not
allow for expenditure of funds for park development purposes, but
that it could be amended. Mr. Stock stated tax increment funding
could be used for a possible community center and outdoor park
facilities, ball fields, swimming pool, etc .
Cncl . Sweeney stated that such an amendment would not automatically
authorize any action or funds being utilized without first coming
before city council and HRA.
Sweeney/Lynch moved to authorize the appropriate HRA officials to
work with the City' s Bond Counsel to develop the necessary Tax
Increment Financing Plan amendments to allow for the potential
financing of park improvement projects. Motion carried
unanimously.
Mr. Stock explained that the Community Development Commission (CDC)
has been working with the architect on amendments to the Rehab
Grant Program and there have been some provisions deleted and some
criteria added to make it more restrictive .
Sweeney/Vierling moved to refer the Rehab Grant Program Guideline
amendments, as submitted by the Community Development Commission,
to the Committee of the Whole on December 14 , 1993 . Motion carried
unanimously.
Ms. Marty explained briefly why Mr. Rutt is requesting
reimbursement for title insurance he purchased in connection with
the property he is buying from the HRA. Because Mr. Rutt was not
present she recommended that the request be tabled to allow him an
opportunity to speak to the matter. Discussion followed.
Laurent/Vierling moved to approve the payment to Mr. Rutt of $380
for title insurance .
Mayor Laurent commented that Mr. Rutt had an opportunity to speak
tonight but elected not to appear. He also stated that Mr. Rutt
chose to close on this property rather than wait for the torrens
process to be completed and therefore should accept the
consequences involved with purchasing the property.
Motion failed unanimously.
Chrmn. Beard adjourned the HRA meeting at 7 : 25 PM.
Dennis R. Kraft
Executive Director
Debra Zabel
Recording Secretary
MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator
RE: Election of Officers
DATE: December 30, 1993
INTRODUCTION:
Article II Section B of the Bylaws of the HRA provide for the
election of officers at the annual meeting.
BACKGROUND:
The Bylaws provide that a Chairman, Vice Chairman and Secretary be
elected by and from the Commissioners at the annual meeting
immediately after the roll call and approval of the minutes of the
previous meeting. The officers shall take office immediately after
being elected.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Move to elect a Chairman, Vice Chairman and Secretary from the
membership of the Commission.
If Li
MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: Toni Warhol, Administrative Secretary
RE: Commissioner Interest in Real Estate
DATE: December 27, 1993
Please find attached a disclosure of real estate located within the
corporate limits of the City of Shakopee. Please list any property
that you have interest in. Thank you.
**NOTE: I have attached last year's for your convenience.
I, , have interest in the following
real estate located within the corporate limits of the City of
Shakopee:
Date: Signature:
01;04 £44 15:22 FAX 612 340 2644 DORSEY 'HITNEI 21002
( 4 WS
DORSEY Sc WHITNEY
A►.a.•au..?111C1CTIC,frwav,o..c Ce+,+Lao►S
NEW yogic
gpGSS$r88,2
KIf
PILLSBURY CENTER SOT
220 SOUTH SIXTH STREET
WASHINGTON, D. C. jILLIvfS
N XTss402-1498
DEvvE B 612) 340-2600! HEAT FALLS
FAX(ea)340-2868 ?i 13 S O V I.d
ORANGE GOVNTY, CS THOMAS S.KAT D s S O I]�E S
0121345:79616
LONDo� aAL[Go
88IIS9ELS .
January 4, 1994
Mr . Barry Stock
Executive Director
Housing and Redevelopment Authority
129 Holmes�Street 579 South
Shakopee,
Re: Canterbury Downs
Dear Barry:
As you know, Bob Silverman of our office is representing
ro osed acquisition Jacobs Realty, Inc. with respect to its p of of
P the
the Canterbury Downs Racetrack. As a necessary part
acquisition Jacobs Realty, Inc. has agreed to assume theRA under
obligations of Minnesota Ractoro the, to the City's Racetrack, described in 1993,
a
certain agreements relating
proposed form of letter agreement dated as of December 8,Marty has
among the City, the HRA and Jacobs Realty,
suggested that the proposed letter agreement be rewordedlso that
either Jacobs Realty, Inc. assumes Minnesota Racetracks the
obligations .under the Development Agreement (as
described in the
Assessment Agreement and the Payment Agreement) is cr nt
letter agreement, or Minnesota Racetrack, Inc. Bob Silverman released that
from the Development Agreement. to make
Karen thinks this change is necessary and
Bob is planning
this change to the proposed letter ag lamentation of the
I believe the approval, execution and implementation
December 8 letter agreement, with the change suggested by earth
Marty, would leave the Citrin the same position as it is now in,
and therefore should be agreeable to: the City.
Very truly you s,
: 7e,.---- .
Thomas S. Hay
TSH/lmm
•
J144-04-1994 4 '10=24 b12 340 2b44 92 P.02
01.04 94 16:06 FAX 6123407800 DORSEY "HITNEY (ij002
DORSEY ac WHITNEY
A P—.Maswr 1xcturwo Paonssmr.,Wasoy=ays
NEW YORE
PILLSBURY CENTER SOUTH ROCHESTER,MN
WASHINGTON, D. C. 220 SOUTH SIXTH STREET
MINNEPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55402-1496 BI
i 2=vG3
.S
DENVER (612) 340-2600 1
OaEVAT FALLS
ORANGE COUNTY, Cs
FAX lam)dao-9868
hupsOVLA
LONDON
ROBERT J.SILVERMAN DEss MOINES
garts BELS (812$442742 •
rAa00
January 4, 1994
13Y FAX
Mr. Barry Stock
The Housing and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City of Shakopee
129 First Avenue East
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re: Canterbury Racetrack
• i
Dear Barry:
I enclose a revised draft of the letter to the City of Shakopee concerning
the Canterbury Racetrack. The only changes are to eliminate the reference to the
Development Agreement in the last paragraph of the text of the letter and the I
paragraph by which the City and the HRA consent.
Dan Lindsay will be at the council meeting this evening and is in
position to execute the document at that time.
Very tru urs,
•
•
Robert J. Silverman I
RJS:jkk
Enclosure
cc: Daniel T. Lindsay
Thomas S. Hay
II
JHN-Ido-1' 94 i6:09 bi2.541aTe60 93'4 P.02
01/04'94 16.07 FAX 6123407S00 D0RSE1' S"HITNEF 0003
JACOBS REALTY, INC.
100 South Fifth Street
Suite 2500
Minneapolis, MN 55402 if
January 4, 1994
City of Shakopee
129 First Avenue East
Shakopee, MN 55379
The Housing and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City of Shakopee
129 First Avenue East
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re: Canterbury Downs is
fI
Ladies and Gentlemen: ;I
Jacobs Realty, Inc. ("Jacobs") has a contract to acquire the Canterbury
Downs Racetrack from its present owners, New Canterbury Downs, a Minnesota
general partnership ("Sellers"). We are aware of the terms and conditions of the
Second Amended Contract for Private Development between the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota ("City"), the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City
of Shakopee, Minnesota ("Authority") and Minnesota Racetrack, Inc. dated
November 20, 1984, as amended by First Addendum to Second Amended Contract
for Private Development dated March 5, 1985 and by Quit Claim Deed dated March
8, 1985 ("Development Agreement"). We are also aware of the Assessment
Agreement between the Authority and Minnesota Racetrack, Inc. dated October 29,
1984, as amended by Amendment to Assessment Agreement dated May 14, 1992 and
Second Amendment to Assessment Agreement dated October 14, 1992 ("Assessment
Agreement"). We are also aware of the Payment Assurance and Security Agreement
dated October 13, 1992 between the Authority and Ladbroke Racing Canterbury, Inc.
("Payment Agreement").
�fI
Our contract with the Sellers requires that we provide assurances that
the Sellers will have no exposure, after closing under the Assessment Agreement
and Payment Agreement. In order to so assure the Sellers and in accordance wit1i
the terms of those documents, Jacobs proposes, at closing, to assume the obligatidns
s
under the Assessment Agreement, and the Payment Agreement. Please take thisi
letter as our written undertaking that, subject to closing on the purchase, Jacobs
Realty, Inc. will assume the obligations set forth in the Assessment Agreement and
the Payment Agreement from and after closing. At or shortly after the closing,
is
misimmmummo
J H 1�!774 l b•etS b 1 GJ4✓_1 173.00 P.073'
01/04'93 16:07 FAX 6123407500 DURSEI' xHITNEl 2003
•
City of Shakopee
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority
in and for the City of Shakopee
January 4, 1994
Page 2
Jacobs will deliver to the Authority an Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit which
will satisfy the requirements of Section 2.02 of the Payment Agreement.
When closing occurs and Jacobs delivers the Letter of Credit in a form
acceptable to the Authority, we ask that you release Ladbroke Racing Canterbury,
Inc., New Canterbury Downs, and its partners, Ladbroke Racing Minnesota, Inc. and
Racing Corporation of Minnesota, now known by mergers as Hartman & Tiner, Inc.,
from all liability after the dosing with respect to'the Assessment Agreement and
Payment Agreement and further cancel and release to them the Letter of Credit
previously issued and outstanding under the Payment Agreement.
Very truly yours,
JACOBS REALTY, INC.
By
Its 'I
The undersigned hereby agree in connection with the sale of
Canterbury Downs, and subject to closing thereof, to accept from the new owner;
Jacobs Realty, Inc., the assumption of obligations after the dosing under the
Assessment Agreement and Payment Agreement above referred to, and upon
receipt of a new letter of credit, in a form acceptable to the Authority, we will release
Minnesota Racetrack, Inc., Ladbroke Racing Canterbury, Inc,New Canterbury
Downs, Ladbroke Racing, Inc. and Racing Corporation of Minnesota, now known by
mergers as Hartman & Tiner, Inc., from all future liability under and or pursuant to
the Assessment Agreement or Payment Agreement and will return their letter of
credit held by us in connection with such agreements.
Dated: CITY OF SHAKOPEE
By I�
Its II
.1
JAN-04-1994 16 09 6123407800 9 P.04
01/04/94 16:08 FAX 6123307900 DORSEY HHIT\EY Eit005
City of Shakopee
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority
in and for the City of Shakopee
January 4, 1994 i
Page 3
THE HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN
AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
By Ii
Its .I
it
TC hl_fiA_'1 OOA +C•fa0 C1'7ZA 70Mn l
J1"11• UY 1JJY 1V•VJ VIGJYVIVVV JJ/ •VJ
HR — S—
coofi e l /Sb
MEMORANDUM
TO: COMMISSIONERS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Karen Marty, City Attorney
DATE : December 30 , 1993
RE: Canterbury Downs Letter of Credit
BACKGROUND:
At the last HRA meeting, the HRA discussed the proposed
substitution of a letter of credit from Jacobs Realty, Inc . for the
letter of credit we have from Canterbury Downs . Due to the broad
language in the letter of intent, staff requested that this item be
tabled to seek input from our bond counsel .
Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator, attempted to
contact our bond counsel, Tom Hay, and learned that he was out of
town. He should be returning on Monday, January 3, and has been
asked to contact us as soon as possible. We hope to have a
response from him in time for the HRA meeting Tuesday night . Any
information we receive from him will be placed on the table .
An attorney representing Jacobs Realty will be present at the
meeting.
ACTION REQUESTED:
None until we receive word from our bond counsel .
/
Signed L��
Karen Marty, Cit attorney
KEM:bjm
[3 OMEMO2]
MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, Executive Director HRA
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator
RE: Canterbury Downs Letter of Credit
DATE: December 14, 1993
INTRODUCTION:
On December 7, 1993 , the Shakopee HRA discussed the status of
the Canterbury Downs letter of credit in relation to the proposed
acquisition. Jacobs Realty, Inc. is requesting that the
appropriate HRA and City of Shakopee officials to execute a
. memorandum of understanding in regard to the letter of credit .
BACKGROUND:
On December 7, 1993 the Shakopee HRA members conceptually
agreed to substitute the letter of credit on file with New
Canterbury Downs and replace it with a new letter of credit from
Jacobs Realty, Inc. providing that all necessary and applicable
conditions are met in a form acceptable to the City and HRA.
On December 8, 1993 staff received a correspondence from
Jacobs Realty, Inc . (See Attachment) The correspondence serves as
a memorandum of understanding between the City of Shakopee, the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and Jacobs Realty, Inc.
regarding the status of the letter of credit should a property
transaction occur by and between New Canterbury Downs and Jacobs
Realty, Inc. The memorandum basically specifies that the City and
the HRA agree to release New Canterbury Downs, Inc . from the letter
of credit providing that Jacobs Realty, Inc. substitutes a new
letter of credit that will satisfy all the requirements of Section
2 . 02 of the original payment and assurity agreement .
The City Attorney has reviewed the memorandum and believes
that it does nothing more than conceptually agree to release New
Canterbury Downs from their letter of credit commitment in exchange
for a new letter of credit from Jacobs Realty, Inc . in a form
acceptable to the City.
ALTERNATIVES :
1 . Authorize the appropriate HRA/City officials to execute the
memorandum of understanding by and between Jacobs Realty, Inc .
and the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
2 . Do not authorize the appropriate HRA/City officials to execute
the memorandum of understanding.
3 . Table action pending further information from staff .
ACTION REQUESTED:
H R 1 . Move to authorize the appropriate HRA officials to execute the
memorandum of understanding by and between Jacobs Realty, Inc .
and the Shakopee Housing
geandbRedeer ,7elo9ment Authority for the
City of Shakopee dated
3 .
coupluC 2 . Move to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute
the memorandum of understanding by and of Shakopee dated DecemberetweengJacobs 1993 ,Realty,
Inc . and theCity
BAS/tiv
CovXc1L - 13&. CottsE ,/T
MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, Executive Director HRA
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator
RE: Canterbury Downs Letter of Credit
DATE: December 14, 1993
INTRODUCTION:
On December 7, 1993 , the Shakopee HRA discussed the status of
the Canterbury Downs letter of credit in relation to the proposed
acquisition. Jacobs Realty, Inc. is requesting that the
appropriate HRA and City of Shakopee officials to execute a
memorandum of understanding in regard to the letter of credit .
BACKGROUND:
On December 7, 1993 the Shakopee HRA members conceptually
agreed to substitute the letter of credit on file with New
Canterbury Downs and replace it with a new letter of credit from
Jacobs Realty, Inc. providing that all necessary and applicable
conditions are met in a form acceptable to the City and HRA.
On December 8, 1993 staff received a correspondence from
Jacobs Realty, Inc . (See Attachment) The correspondence serves as
a memorandum of understanding between the City of Shakopee, the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and Jacobs Realty, Inc.
regarding the status of the letter of credit should a property
transaction occur by and between New Canterbury Downs and Jacobs
Realty, Inc. The memorandum basically specifies that the City and
the HRA agree to release New Canterbury Downs, Inc . from the letter
of credit providing that Jacobs Realty, Inc. substitutes a new
letter of credit that will satisfy all the requirements of Section
2 . 02 of the original payment and assurity agreement .
The City Attorney has reviewed the memorandum and believes
that it does nothing more than conceptually agree to release New
Canterbury Downs from their letter of credit commitment in exchange
for a new letter of credit from Jacobs Realty, Inc . in a form
acceptable to the City.
ALTERNATIVES :
1 . Authorize the appropriate HRA/City officials to execute the
memorandum of understanding by and between Jacobs Realty, Inc .
and the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
2 . Do not authorize the appropriate HRA/City officials to execute
the memorandum of understanding.
3 . Table action pending further information from staff .
JACOBS REALTY, INC.
100 South Fifth Street
Suite 2500
Minneapolis, MN 55402
December 16, 1993
City of Shakopee
129 First Avenue East
Shakopee, MN 55379
The Housing and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City of Shakopee
129 First Avenue East
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re: Canterbury Downs
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Jacobs Realty, Inc. ("Jacobs") has a contract to acquire the Canterbury
Downs Racetrack from its present owners, New Canterbury Downs, a Minnesota
general partnership ("Sellers"). We area are omthe
terms
between the City of Shakopee,
Second Amended Contract for Private Development
Minnesota ("City"), the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City
of Shakopee, Minnesota ("Authority") and Minnesota Racetrack, Inc. dated
November 20, 1984, as amended by First 1985Addendum to and byQust C1aimecond ADeedded datedoMarch
ntract
for Private Development dated March 5,
8, 1985 ("Development Agreement"). We are also aware of the Assessment
Agreement between the Authority and Minnesota Racetrack, Inc. dated October 29,
1984, as amended by Amendment to Assessment Agreement datedr 14M2 (May 4, 1992mndd
Second Amendment to Assessment Agreement date
Agreement"). We are also aware of the Payment Assurance and Security Agreement
dated October 13, 1992 between the Authority and Ladbroke Racing Canterbury, Inc.
("Payment Agreement").
Our contract with the Sellers requires that we provide assurances that
the Sellers will have no exposure, after closing under the Assessment Agreement
and Payment Agreement. In order to so assure the Sellers and in accordance with
the terms of those documents, Jacobs proposes, at closing, to assume the obligations
under the Assessment Agreement, and the Payment Agreement. Please take this
letter as our written undertaking that, subject
fforthin ltheclosing on the purchase, Jacobs
Assessment Agreement and
Realty, Inc. will assume the obligations se
the Payment Agreement from and after closing. At or shortly after the closing,
City of Shakopee
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority
in and for the City of Shakopee
December 16, 1993
Page 2
Jacobs will deliver to the Authority an Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit which
will satisfy the requirements of Section 2.02 of the Payment Agreement.
When closing occurs and Jacobs delivers the Letter of Credit in a
form acceptable to the Authority, we ask that you release Ladbroke Racing
Canterbury, Inc., New Canterbury Downs, and its partners, Ladbroke Racing
Minnesota, Inc. and Racing Corporation of Minnesota, now known by mergers as
Hartman & Tiner, Inc., from all liability after the closing with respect to the
Assessment Agreement, Development Agreement and Payment Agreement and
further cancel and release to them the Letter of Credit previously issued and
outstanding under the Payment Agreement.
Very truly yours,
JACf+BS REALTY, INC.
L -C1
By . \
Its F
The undersigned hereby agree in connection with the sale of
Canterbury Downs, and subject to closing thereof, to accept from the new owner,
Jacobs Realty, Inc., the assumption of obligations after the closing under the
Assessment Agreement and Payment Agreement above referred to, and upon
receipt of a new letter of credit, in a form acceptable to the Authority, we will release
Minnesota Racetrack, Inc., Ladbroke Racing Canterbury, Inc., New Canterbury
Downs, Ladbroke Racing, Inc. and Racing Corporation of Minnesota, now known by
mergers as Hartman & Tiner, Inc., from all future liability under and or pursuant to
the Development Agreement, Assessment Agreement or Payment Agreement and
will return their letter of credit held by us in connection with such agreements.
Dated: CITY OF SHAKOPEE
By
Its
•
City of Shakopee
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority
in and for the City of Shakopee
December 16, 1993
Page 2
Jacobs will deliver to the Authority an Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit which
will satisfy the requirements of Section 2.02 of the Payment Agreement.
When closing occurs and Jacobs delivers the Letter of Credit in a
form acceptable to the Authority, we ask that you release Ladbroke Racing
Canterbury, Inc., New Canterbury Downs, and its partners, Ladbroke Racing
Minnesota, Inc. and Racing Corporation of Minnesota, now known by mergers as
Hartman & Tiner, Inc., from all liability after the closing with respect to the .
Assessment Agreement, Development Agreement and Payment Agreement and
further cancel and release to them the Letter of Credit previously issued and
outstanding under the Payment Agreement.
Very truly yours,
JACBS REALTY, INC.
By sQ����.
Its Via Prisident Seac&A
The undersigned hereby agree in connection with the sale of
Canterbury Downs, and subject to closing thereof, to accept from the new owner,
Jacobs Realty, Inc., the assumption of obligations after the closing under the
Assessment Agreement and Payment Agreement above referred to, and upon
receipt of a new letter of credit, in a form acceptable to the Authority, we will release
Minnesota Racetrack, Inc., Ladbroke Racing Canterbury, Inc., New Canterbury
Downs, Ladbroke Racing, Inc. and Racing ll future liabilration ity f nder Minnesota,and or pursuant by
mergers as Hartman & Tiner, Inc., fromY
the Development Agreement, Assessment Agreement or Payment Agreement and
will return their letter of credit held by us in connection with such agreements.
Dated: CITY OF SHAKOPEE
By
Its
City of Shakopee
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority
in and for the City of Shakopee
December 16, 1993
Page 3
THE HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN
AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
By
Its
✓
RESOLUTION NO. 3930
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF
COMMISSIONERS FOR THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee on January
11, 1977, adopted Resolution No. 1014 which accepted the
resignation of the previous Commissioners of the Shakopee Housing
and Redevelopment Authority and appointed in their place the then
current members of the City Council, and
WHEREAS, it was and is the intent of the City Council for the
Mayor and all future members of the City Council to automatically
serve as Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
concurrently with their Council terms.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1. That Robert Sweeney and Kristen Dirks are hereby
appointed as Commissioners of the Shakopee Housing and
Redevelopment Authority until December 31, 1997, and Gary
Laurent is hereby appointed as Commissioner of the
Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority until
December 31, 1995.
2. That the above-named persons will serve until new Council
members and a Mayor have taken the oath of office as
members of the City Council and are qualified as
Commissioners by taking the Commissioners' oath.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 4th day of January, 1994.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 7, 1993
Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 7 : 05 PM with Cncl .
Vierling, Lynch, Beard and Sweeney present . Also present : Dennis
Kraft, City Administrator; Barry Stock, Asst. City Administrator;
Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; Karen Marty, City Attorney; Dave
Hutton, Public Works Director, and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk.
Mr. Kraft deleted from the agenda 131) 1994-96 Public Works Labor
Agreement . Mr. Kraft added to the Executive Session litigation and
collective bargaining.
Vierling/Sweeney moved to approve the agenda as modified. Motion
carried unanimously.
Mayor Laurent recessed the City Council meeting at 7 : 07 PM for an
H.R.A. meeting.
Mayor Laurent reconvened the City Council meeting at 7 :25 PM.
Liaison reports were given by the Councilmembers.
Mayor Laurent gave the Mayor' s report .
Mayor Laurent asked if anyone present in the audience wished to
speak on any item not on the agenda.
Mark Pidde, President of Shakopee Youth Hockey Association, asked
the Council to approve a lease agreement for this organization to
have pull tabs in Springers on Main.
Ms . Cox explained to Council the procedure to be followed to
approve a premises permit for pull tabs .
Beard/Sweeney offered Resolution No. 3922, A Resolution Approving
Premises Permit for the Shakopee Youth Hockey, Inc . (conditioned
upon the surrender of the existing license at Springers on Main) ,
and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously.
Councilmembers added to the consent business : 10a) Barb10b Mahar,
request to use space at former City Hall building;
Kaufenberg, request from Hockey Association for lights at former
ice bubble hockey rink at Lions Park; 12a) Refuse Collection
Contract -Addendum #2 ; 13f) Stop Sign Request on 7th and Dakota;
13h) Pierce Street Vacation/Improvements from 3rd to 4th and 13o)
Employee Group Insurance Proposals . Councilmembers deleted from
the consent business : 9) Approval of the Minutes of November 16th
and 18th, 1993 and 14h) Resolution No. 3915, Premises Permit
Prior Lake Lions Club.
Cncl . Beard stated that in the minutes of November 16 , 1993 on page
6 talking about the temporary blacktop that it was unclear that the
Official Proceedings of the December 7, 1993
Shakopee City Council Page -2-
comment by Mr. Hutton was in answer to a question by Cncl . Beard.
Therefore he would like to have this portion to be amended to make
clear that this was in answer to his question.
Beard/Vierling moved to approve the Minutes of November 16, 1993
with an amendment to page 6, paragraph 8, "In answer to a question
that Cncl Beard asked, Mr.Hutton stated that possibly the City
could put down temporary blacktop" . Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Lynch moved approval of the Minutes of November 18, 1993 .
Motion carried unanimously with Cncl . Beard abstaining. w
Vierling/Lynch moved to grant permission for the All Night
Graduation Party Committee to utilize space at the former City Hall
between January 1 and June 9, 1994 . (Motion carried under consent
business . )
Vierling/Lynch moved to allocate up to $2, 500 from the Park Reserve
Fund to offset the costs of installing outdoor light fixtures
around the former ice bubble hockey rink at Lion' s Park. (Motion
carried under consent business . )
Vierling/Lynch moved to approve contract addendum #2 to the Refuse
Collection Contract by and between the City of Shakopee and Waste
Management Inc . (Motion carried under consent business . )
Ms . Cox, City Clerk, gave a brief presentation of the Tattoo
License being requested by Linda Ann Kurian, 1st in Hair and
Tanning/Body Art . Ms . Cox stated that Mr. Paskoff, did an
inspection of the premises and found it to be an appropriate
facility for this use . She explained the variances being requested
and other changes Ms . Kurian asked for.
Mayor Laurent read a letter received by Rita Topic on behalf of
Linda Kurian.
Ms . Marty stated that Ms . Kurian has requested wearing blue
surgical gowns as opposed to the white garments required under City
Code .
Lynch/Sweeney moved to approve variance requests of Linda Kurian
for a tattoo license to permit the use of dry heat for
sterilization (only when using disposable needles) , use of a dental
chair for clients, and use of colored washable garments for
technicians to be effective upon the date of publication of an
amendment to the City Code permitting said variances . Motion
carried unanimously.
Lynch/Sweeney moved to direct the City Attorney to prepare the
appropriate ordinance amending the City Code to permit the
variances requested. Motion carried unanimously.
December 7, 1993
Official Proceedings of the DecDece -3-
Shakopee City Council Pag
Lynch/Sweeney moved to find the 64 sq. ft . area to be sufficient in
which to practice tattooing, since it is located within a beauty
shop occupying over 800 sq. ft . Motion carried unanimously.
Lynch/Sweeney moved to approve the application and grant a tattoo
license to Linda Ann Kurian, 1st in Hair and Tanning/Body Art,
205
S. Lewis, through December 31, 1994 effective uponhe to the
of
publication of an amendment to the City Code permitting
variances requested. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3917, A Resolution Amending
Resolution No. 3720, Adopting the 1993 Budget and moved its
adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . )
Vierling/Lynch moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to
buy back unused holiday hours in the amounts indicated and from the
individuals listed in
the
emo from the carried underolice Chief,consent busaness , )ated 12-1-93
(CC DOC No. 205) .
Vierling/Lynch moved to accept the quotation from the League of
Citiesdeposit workers
ompensation coverage
for 1994 with a premium of $114 566 (Motion carried under
consent business . )
Vierling/Lynch moved to ratify the authorization of the proper City
officials to execute a waiver of special assessment appeal rights
for city property for the VIP II sewer extension project . (Motion
carried under consent business . )
Vierling/Lynch moved to direct staff to complete a warrant study to
determine if stop signs are warranted at the intersection of 7th
Avenue and Dakota Street and report back to the City Council at the
earliest opportunity. (Motion carried under consent business . )
Mr. Kraft explained the meetings City staff has been having with
staff from Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) and Met
Council regarding Shakopee hooking up to the Chaska interceptor.
He said that hooking up as a trunk sewer would cost app
roxima
$2 . 6 to $4 million dependent upon the amount of flow and the
location.
Mr. Kraft suggested that Council add this to a Committee of the
Whole meeting for December 14 , 1993 to decide whether Shakopee
should connect to the interceptor, to discuss the cost options and
the impact on sanitary sewer rates . Mr. Kraft stated that included
in the draft agreement is a change in the minimum lot size from 2 . 5
to 10 acres .
Sweeney/Vierling moved to refer the Chaska InterceptorCo Agreement
with the Met Council, the MWCC and Shakopee City
Committee of the Whole meeting on December 14 , 1993 .
Official Proceedings of the December 7, 1993
Shakopee City Council Page -4-
Mr. Hutton, in answer to Council' s questions, explained that the
interceptor could be connected at all points listed, however,
option A (CR-15) is out of city limits . He explained that hook up
at B (CR-79)would be the farthest point and the highest in cost .
Mr. Hutton explained the alternative connecting points to the
Chaska Interceptor and went through specific points for Council to
look at such as options of payment .
Mayor Laurent explained to the audience that Council is proposing
to put this item on the Committee of the Whole to discuss alb the
new information that was given to them.
Mr. Jon Albinson, 5740 Valley Industrial South, stated that he
would like to bring up some points to staff at this time so these
items could be discussed with the MWCC before the next meeting.
Cncl . Sweeney suggested that Mr. Albinson write staff the concerns
he has and also copy Councilmembers .
Ms . Marty stated Brian Ohm, Met Council Attorney, and Allen Dye,
MWCC Project Manager, were present tonight if Council had any
questions of them.
Both gentlemen stated they would be available for the meeting on
December 14th.
Motion carried unanimously.
Sweeney/Lynch moved to have Cncl . Vierling continue attending these
meetings with Met Council and MWCC to obtain her expertise from her
service on the MWCC. Motion carried with Cncl . Vierling
abstaining.
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3909, A Resolution Calling a
Hearing on an Improvement to Pierce Street from 3rd Avenue to 4th
Avenue, Project No. 1994-5, and moved its adoption. (Motion
carried under consent business . )
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3910, A Resolution Initiating
the Vacation of Pierce Street from 3rd Avenue to 4th Avenue Except
Alley, Original Plat of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota, and
moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . )
Vierling/Lynch moved to direct staff to obtain the executed
agreement for the new easement and authorize proper City officials
to prepare and sign appropriate documents to release the existing
easement with J. L. Shiely Co. (Motion carried under consent
business . )
7, 1993
Official Proceedings of the December Page -
Shakopee City Council
Mr. Hutton explained the supplement St to Aid Systems 1994-1998 He explained
Improvement Program dealing
that the City is allowed to designate so many
eceive funding. tare
at
Aid System and for those miles the City
would Hutton stated the only way to designate
undesignated iny the resofutu�e if
Council and that the streets
need be .
f the
ith
Mr. Hutton explained the second
thatportion theC City needsltodspendwthe
project selection. He stated
money they receive, if the money increases too much the City will
be penalized.
Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve the 1994-1998 State Aid Capital
Improvement Program.
Mr. Hutton wanted to congratulate kn t the
newprostaff Civil Engineer,
Dave Nummer, for his hard
t .
Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Lynch moved to approve bills in the amount of $27, 178 . 61 .
(Motion carried under consent business . )
Vierling/Lynch moved to ratify the execution of an easement between
the City of Shakopee andthe
Stateofthef Rahrnesota' s forcemainorre (Motiontional
Facility for the installation
carried under consent business . )
Vierling/Lynch moved to direct the City Engineer to prepare an
engineering feasibility study
itsradoptiaon ruc(Motion ure c a�ri ed under
ments in
the P & V Addition, and moved
consent business . )
Vierling/Ly
nch moved to accept the proposal for employee group
insurance starting January 1, 1994 from Blue Cross Blue Shield for
health coverage through the
psius Agency, from h t e Ochs Agencytanda ufrom
Life for life and AD&D coverage througthrough the Capesius
Fortis Benefits for long term disability 9
Agency and to authorize the
ficials onsentto businesse ) the
necessary documents . (Motion carried under
herling/Ly
nch offered Resolution No. 3912 , A Resolution Approving
the Final Plat for Westridge Lake Estates, First Addition, and
moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . )
Vthe Public Hearing Date to Consider the Vacation of a Portion of
the Alley in Block 30 Shakopee
inessPlat,
) and moved its adoption.
(Motion carried underconsent
Official Proceedings of the December 7, 1993
Shakopee City Council Page -6-
Mr. Hutton stated that there is an existing Developer' s Agreement
(1987) with a property owner on Marschall Road to put in sidewalks
or the city could put in sidewalks and assess them and the
developer waived their right to assessment hearing. Staff would
like direction as to what Council would like to do, in light of
recent City policies concerning sidewalks, with the proposed
sidewalk improvements .
Cncl . Sweeney stated that consistent with recent practice not to
assess for sidewalks on collector streets, he did not feel the city
could hold this agreement in force and make the developer pay for
something that is beneficial to the public .
Mayor Laurent stated that he may have been involved with this
project and if that is the case he would abstain from the
discussion.
Mr. Hutton stated that he did bring a copy of the agreement and
felt that the Mayor was involved with this project .
Sweeney/Beard offered Resolution No. 3907, A Resolution Ordering an
Improvement and the Preparation of plans and Specifications for
Sidewalk on Marschall Road from 4th Avenue to 10th Avenue and for
Sidewalk on 10th Avenue from Tyler Street to the Shakopee Town
Square Mall, Project No. 1994-3 , and moved its adoption. Motion
carried with Cncl . Vierling and Mayor Laurent abstaining from the
vote .
Ms . Marty stated that if Council was not proposing assessments,
then a majority vote would suffice .
Sweeney/Beard moved to direct staff to cancel the Developer' s
Agreement relative to that portion of the proposed sidewalk project
which would have otherwise been paid for by the developer (Eagle
Creek Junction 2nd) .
Cncl . Beard asked what amount of the Developer' s Agreement the City
would now be obliged to pay and how many other situations there are
like this in Shakopee .
Ms . Cox informed council that another Developer' s Agreement is in
place for Century Plaza Square 4th Addition on the corner of
Marschall Road and Fourth Avenue, and that sidewalks are to be
installed along Fourth Avenue . She said this would be a similar
situation so assumed the decision of Council would reflect this
other agreement as well .
Cncl . Sweeney stated that the intent of his motion is for sidewalks
not in existence at this time, not to reimburse anyone for
sidewalks already in existence .
December 7, 1993
ec
Official Proceedings of the DD Page -7-
Shakopee City Council
Mr. Hutton stated that the estimated cost of the sidewalks for this
project would be $15, 000 .
Ms . Cox stated that at the time of the agreement for sidewalks in
Eagle Creek Junction 2nd there was not a need or' desire to
construct sidewalks, so there was an agreement made between the
developer and the City to provide for construction at a later date.
Motion carried with Cncl . Beard dissenting, Mayor Laurent and Cncl .
Vierling abstaining from the vote.
Sweeney moved to direct staff to hold an informal public hearing in
front of Council on the
d nue from Tylerewalks g to athe Mall
from 4th to 10th and along
g l0thAvenue
Mayor Laurent stated that he now did not believe he had a conflict
of interest in this property and he thought the agreement stated
that the assessments would be paid by the new property owners.
Cncl . Vierling stated that she also did not need to abstain from
the vote, but felt that since she had interest in property on
Marschall Road that it would be better to abstain.
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3911,
A Resolution Ordering
the Preparation of a Report on 11th Avenue Storm Sewer Laterals,
and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . )
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3908, A Resolution Ordering
the Preparation of a Report on an Improvement to an Unnamed Street
Connecting the Existing County Road 18 with the Proposed new County
Road 18 , and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent
business . )
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3914 , A Resolution Accepting
Work on 2nd Avenue, from Sommerville Street to Shawmut Street
including Various Abutting Cross streets, Project No. 1991-3 , and
moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . )
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3916 , A Resolution Accepting
Work on Vierling Drive,
Between
itsCounty
adoptiona 17 and(Motionocarriedaunder
79,
Project No. 1992-3 , and moved
consent business . )
in
Cncl . Vierling asked wehablertorha�e pullt etabseatrCanterburysInn
Shakopee that would b
rather than an organization outside of the City.
Cncl . Lynch stated that Murphy' s Landing would be interested in
such a money raising program, however if they are not informed of
the possibilities than it is impossible to get into a location.
Official Proceedings of the December 7, 1993
Shakopee City Council Page -8-
Ms . Cox explained that the state law allows a municipality to limit
the potential licensees to organizations that spend so much of
their proceeds within the City' s trade area, this area is defined
by state law. She stated that the licenses are usually good for
two years when they' re approved by the State Gambling Control
Board. Ms . Cox suggested that other organizations interested in
selling pull tabs should contact the City staff to find out where
licenses are issued. She stated that the Gambling Control Board
would issue two licenses for the same site on the restriction they
may not rent the same space .
Ms . Cox stated that if the Council were to deny the license there
would have to be a legitimate reason so it would not be
discriminatory.
Cncl . Vierling suggested tabling the item until Council can receive
other applications from Shakopee organizations and then determine
which better fits the City' s plan.
Mayor Laurent stated that the owner of the premises has to agree to
allow the organization to sell pull tabs at their establishment .
Cncl . Sweeney inquired whether it would be possible for Council by
ordinance to require the City be informed of any termination of
gambling permits .
Ms . Marty stated that she would check into this possibility but did
not feel there would be an advantage to knowing this information
ahead of time .
Vierling/Beard offered Resolution No. 3915, A Resolution of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Approving Premises Permit for the
Prior Lake Lions Club, and moved its adoption. Motion carried with
Cncl . Vierling dissenting.
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3918, A Resolution
Apportioning Assessments Among New Parcels Created as a result of
the Subdivision of Land, Parcel No. 27-004-069-0, and moved its
adoption. (Motion carried under consent business . )
Mayor Laurent recessed the City Council meeting at 9 : 04 PM for an
Executive Session to discuss land acquisition, litigation and
collective bargaining.
Mayor Laurent reconvened the City Council meeting at 9 :48 PM. No
action was taken during the Executive Session.
Mayor Laurent adjourned the meeting to Wednesday, December 8, 1993
at 7 : 00 PM for the public hearing on the 1994 budget . Cncl .
Sweeney spoke regarding the public hearing. Meeting adjourned at
9 : 56 PM.
Judith S. Cox Debra Zabel
City Clerk Recording Secretary
January 4, 1994
Mayor and Council Members
City of Shakopee
129 South Holmes Street
Shakopee, Minnesota 55. _
Re: City of Shakopee Planning Cacmission
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
I applied for appointment to the Planning Ccu fission because I believe every member
of this cor;munity has a responsibility to make some kind of volunteer contribution to
their corrnrmity. their church or their school . While I was a meMber of the Planning
Commission, I did my homework, I prepared for meetings and took an active interest in
Zoning issues, for after all , I swore to uphold the City's Ordinances when I was
appointed. I made an effort to watch my neighborhood and other city activity centers
for the :::ore blatant violations of the City of Shakopee Zoning Code. I have objected
to violations which I felt would have a denigrating effect on my neighborhood or the
activity centers.
After serving on the Planning Commission for the past 4 years, I have decided that I
will not re-apply for appointment. I have reached this decision because I believe
the City does give Planning Comrmission volunteers enough respect to warrant further
frustration of serving on this commission. The following examples illustrate my
point:
• I noticed "outside storage" at K Mart. I talked to the store manager and
was told that they would gladly screen the storage if the City would
simply write them a letter noting the non-compliance and reauesting
screening. I called the City Administrator's (then Manager/Planner)
attention to the problem at my third meeting as a Planning Cormissioner
and I was told to be patient, I was told a new Planner would soon be
hired. I was told the new Planner needed to get his feet on the ground.
Time passed and I was then told that a new Assistant Planner was being
hired and as soon as the assistant settled in, the assistant was going to
work on Code compliance. I was told the Planning Department was over-
loaded, I was told that Shakopee just did not have the staff, and I
waited for someone to write K Mart a letter on City stationery requesting
that K Mart erect a fence to screen its outside storage from the adjacent
residential neighborhood, so K Mart could send that letter to its home
office and get fundina for the fence to screen outside storage. Much to
my own embarrassment, K Mart's Manager would ask about the letter
whenever I saw him in the store. I waited three years for that letter
and once it had the letter, K Mart irmmediately installed the screening.
The message this gives a Planning Carmission McMber is that the City is
indifferent to Code enforcement or the City is indifferent to a request
by a Planning Commission Member or some combination of both.
• A review of past Planning Ccamission Agenda packets will show that items
are routinely placed on the agenda even though information, required for
the applications, is missing or is received long after the application
deadlines. This practice occurs so that applicants can maintain a
Mayor and Council Members
City of Shakopee
City of. Shakopee Planning Commission
January 4, 1994
Page 2 of 2
timetable or schedule that the applicants have established for
themselves. The schedules of the applicants do not necessarily take into
account the information needs of the public or the Planning Commission
Merroers. The Planning Commission Members are then expected to make
decisions without required information or with minimal time to review the
information. The message this practice gives a Planning Ccmni.ssion
Mer:oer is that the City will continue this practice in order to
acoarmodate the applicants and not the decision makers.
• A subdivision needed the vacation of right of way. i did not believe it
was appropriate to vacate that right of way until a decision was reached
on the layout of the west interchange of the T.H. 169 Bypass. I did not
prevail on the timing. It was unfortunate to see lost access to the
mall , but I did not want to see pedestrian access lost. I recce mended
and obtained the addition of a pedestrian trail in the subdivision. The
trail was to connect the mall and the existing designated pedestrian
corridor on 11th Avenue. Improvements were made to the subdivision, but
the pedestrian trail was not among the improvements. The City was asked
about the status of the trail in August, 1993. The trail was installed
in 1993. The trail does not connect to the mall, the trail does not meet
A.D.A. accessibility requirements for the handicapped and a drainage way
floods the trail every time it rains or every time snow melts. The
message in this incident is that the City needs to work on follow up.
I have pointec: out three exam les I believe show a lack of respect by the City.
Unfortunately these were not isolated examples. As a volunteer, I do not need to
seek frustration. There are many other opportunities for volunteers in this
community and I expect to seek those. I have taken this dramatic action because I
believe that the remaining Panning Commission Members and my successor needs more
respect. The City need to change.
Sincerely,
Henry 1 . Spurrier
1717 Presidential Lane
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
n�R SpvKieint ( � f co fcls
wt rpt cDoNo/4 q7 rt� e i• y-9 y NE-Erin
izc
CN...... 1....
NIIIIN Scott County Transportation Coalition
P.O.BOX 153 SHAKOPEE,MN 55379 (612)496-8346
MEMORANDUM
MEMBERS OF THE COALITION:
Scott County Board DATE: December 23, 1993
of Commissioners
Cities of
Belle Plaine TO: Scott County recipients of the Scott County Transportation
B
Elko Coalition newsletter
Jordan
New MarketitX
n
New raguc
Prior Lake FROM: Bill Koniarski, Chair
Sgvage
Shakopee
Townships of:
Belle Plaine
Blakeley
Cedar Lake
Credit River We must send a message to our Governor and local legislators NOW.
Helena
Jackson
se
NewMarket We know our highway program has a lot to do with our survival and our jobs,
New Ma
SandCrek` but there are many other factors that relate to a great highway program;
Spring Lake bringing farm products, manufacturing goods and services to the market
Chambers of Commerce
place. Safety for our children on school buses and the rest of us as we travel
Prior Lake
Savage for whatever reason. The costs of congested highways and lack of timely
Shakopee
maintenance will cost the tax payers in our state many times more if we delay
Industrial Commissions:
Prior Lake the funding programs needed NOW.
Shakopee •
Attractions: Please have every voter in your agency or household sign the attached form,
CanterbTury
Downs and when you have all the signed forms, please return them to Brad Larson,
Murphy's Landing MN
Little Six Inc. Scott County Highway Department, 600 Country Trail East, Jordan,
Renaissance Festival ����,�
Va!leyfatrFamily 55 52.
Amusement Park
Ex-officio Members:
Minnesota Department of Thank you in advance for your support.
Transportation
Hennepin County Department
of Transportation
Metropolitan Council
City of Bloomington
City of Burnsville
Bloomington Chamber of CommercB K/kg
LeSucur Chamber of Commerce f V
Att.
MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SYSTEM IN CRISIS
The condition of Minnesota's highways and bridges is deteriorating quickly. In 1991 the
Transportation Study Board created by the Minnesota Legislature determined we should
be spending double what we were then on highway reconstruction. Since that time, the
money spent on the Minnesota State Highway system lettings has shrunk almost 40
percent. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has recently
canceled 315 projects from its 1994 to 1996 program. The total list of canceled
projects represented $500M in scheduled construction and the loss of over 2,700
private sector jobs. Mn/DOT's literature further suggests that if a decision is not made
to increase the funding for streets and highways, Minnesota would lose its ability to
match federal funds and highway construction would completely stop by 1999!
Streets and highways are the foundation of our whole economic system and way of life.
The ability to travel freely throughout the State and Twin Cities metro area is essential
to economic development, jobs, personal safety and the integrity of our neighborhoods
and schools. While highways must be coupled with a whole range of transit and
management actions, without roads nothing else moves. If the school bus can't get the
children to school without sitting in traffic or crossing an unsafe bridge or highway, what
happens to our education system? Our personal safety, our jobs, and our ability to
access important recreation and education opportunities all are at stake.
If Minnesotans are concerned about the impending crisis on Minnesota's highways,
they need to speak as a single voice--restore the 315 projects canceled from the
Mn/DOT 1994-1996 highway construction programs. It is time for action; it is time
to restate the commitment to our highway infrastructure. It is time to speak out for the
highway you use and tell your elected officials why these roads are important to you.
NOTE: The Shakopee Bypass is one of the projects delayed. The project schedule
shows a 3-YEAR delay--to 1997!!
= TSPO . , • - • �.. BRIDGE THE GAP D O
FII1'G
I support the restoration of the 315 important projects in the
Mn/DOT 1994-1996 Highway Construction Program through responsible
funding programs.
Name (Print) :
Signed:
Address :
Telephone :
Comments :
Name (Print) :
Signed:
Address :
Telephone :
Comments :
Name (Print) :
Signed:
Address :
Telephone :
Comments :
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Marschall Road/10th Avenue Sidewalk Project
DATE: December 29, 1993
INTRODUCTION:
On December 7, 1993 the City Council of Shakopee ordered the preparation of plans and
specifications for the construction of sidewalk on the east side of Marschall Road from 4th
Avenue to 10th Avenue, and on the south side of 10th Avenue from Tyler Street to the Shakopee
Town Square Mall. During discussion of this item, the Council directed staff to hold an
informational meeting for all adjacent property owners. This meeting is scheduled for the
January 4, 1994 City Council meeting. The purpose of this meeting is to solicit public opinion
and/or comments on the project.
BACKGROUND:
Both of these sidewalk projects were recommended by the Planning Commission as desirable
projects during discussion of the Comprehensive Trail and Sidewalk Plan in September of 1992.
As a part of their recommendation, the Planning Commission identified a list of criteria for
constructing sidewalks. These criteria are listed below in order of priority.
1. School pedestrian routes
2. Minor arterial streets
3. Collector streets
4. School/park areas
5. Commercial areas
6. Pubic facilities
7. Local streets
The Marschall Road Sidewalk Project meets four of the criteria, (No.'s 1, 2, 5 and 6) and the
10th Avenue Project meets three of the criteria (No.'s 2, 5 and 6). To be feasible, or desirable,
a project should meet a minimum of one or two of the above criteria, depending on the priority.
These projects clearly demonstrate not only a high priority for construction, but compliance with
the Comprehensive Trail and Sidewalk Plan as well.
In accord with the Planning Commission recommendations, these projects were included in the
Capital Improvement Plan for construction in 1994. On December 7, 1993 the City Council
ordered these improvements and staff is proceeding with the design and preparation of
construction plans.
Because the project will not be assessed, a public hearing is not required. But the City Council
directed staff to schedule an informational meeting with the abutting properties in order to solicit
comments and respond to any questions regarding the City Council action on this project. All
abutting property owners have been notified of the January 4, 1994 informational meeting.
Staff has received only one call from a property owner regarding this project. Specifically, this
owner was concerned about a safety issue at the corner of Shakopee Avenue and Marschall Road.
Due to the steep grades of the street and curve in the road, this intersection apparently has
historically resulted in vehicles running up over the curb onto yards. This particular resident
requested that the City look at this issue when designing the sidewalk and possibly even relocate
the walk in this area two blocks east onto vacant Ramsey Street right-of-way. Staff indicated that
the safety issue would be evaluated during the design, but as far as relocating the sidewalk two
blocks east for this area, staff did not feel this would be a good alternative because it is highly
unlikely that pedestrians would travel four blocks round trip distance in order to go one block
north or south on the sidewalk.
Staff indicated that these issues would be passed on to the City Council at the January 4, 1994
meeting.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Because the City Council has already ordered this project, no action is required of the City
Council at the January 4, 1994 meeting unless they wish to reconsider their previous action.
DEH/pmp
MARSCHALL
1 *
MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, City Planner
RE: Application for Rezoning the Lenzmeier
o Urban Residential
From Multi-family Residential (R-4)
(R-2) and to Delete the Mandatory PUD Requirement
DATE: December 30, 1993
INTRODUCTION:
At the November 3, 1993 meeting, the Shakopee City Council tabled
their decision on the proposed zoning amendment in order to allow
the developer an opportunity to review other options.
BACKGROUND:
Sienna Corporation has submitted a request to rezone 68 of the 84.5
acres of property owned by the estate of Lorraine Lenzmeier
from
Multi-family Residential (R-4) to Urban Residential (R-2) ,
anddelete the mandatory requirement for a Planned . Unit Development
(PUD) . The site is located south of 4th Avenue, approximately 1/2
mile west of Canterbury Downs. (See Exhibit A. )
At their October 7, 1993 meeting, the Planning Commission held a
public hearing regarding this rezoning request and recommended the
denial of this application to the City Council. The Planning
andmissionmof ed theenial of mandatoryh request
and the deletionPUD because the requests are
inconsistent with the adopted land use plan.
DISCUSSION:
At the December 21, 1993 meeting, the City Council reviewed a
revised conceptual site plan for the Lenzmeier site. The
developers proposed a reduction in the amount of single family lots
and a change in the multi-family development from five (5)a ultpl
e
storied apartment buildings to a large number of six (6) eight
(8) plex structures. It was noted by members of the City Council
that the revised concept plan was an improvement to the original
proposal.
At the December 9 , 1993 meeting, the Planning Commission also
reviewed Sienna's revised concept plan for the Lenzmeier property.
In general, the Planning Commission felt that this plan was an
improvement over the first submittal. They felt that the proposed
mix of housing types was more appropriate.
Staff feels that through the PUD review process, the developer can
work to negotiate development standards for the single family
development within the subject site and replace the underlying R-4
requirements. Since the PUD process does not permit a reduction in
exterior setbacks, the underlying R-4 district regulations can help
establish larger buffer areas around the perimeter
erareas tothe pr
ime of
this
project.ect
This will result in larger buffering
commercial, industrial, and racetrack land uses. The mandatory PUD
and underlying R-4 zoning provide the necessary regulation for the
development of the subject site.
One additional issue that has come up in the review process
lhas
asnto
do with the minimum 20% open space requirement. The app
have indicated that they can provide the required open space areas
with the revised concept plan.
Action by the City Council on the specific request to rezone 68 of
the 84. 5 acres from R-4 to R-2 alicant withdraws the applicationnd the deletion of the y
PUD must be taken unless, the app
ALTERNATIVES -
1. Grant both the request to rezone and the request to delete the
mandatory PUD requirement.
2. Grant the request to rezone, but deny the request to delete
the mandatory PUD requirement.
3 . Deny the request to rezone, but grant the request to delete
the mandatory PUD requirement.
4 . Deny both the request to rezone and the request to delete the
mandatory PUD requirement.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny the
request for rezoning from R-4 to R-2 and deny the request for the
deletion of the mandatory PUD requirement (Alternative 4) because
the requests are inconsistent with the adopted land use plan.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer a motion to direct staff to prepare the appropriate ordinance
to rezoning 68 acres of the subject site from and to Multidelet-family
Residential (R-4) to Urban Residential (R-2) ,
the
Mandatory PUD requirement, and vote in the negative.
(Approval of this motion would require an affirmative vote of 4/5
of the City Council. If the City Council concurs with the
recommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council shoed
uld
vote AGAINST this motion. If the City Council wishes to app
the single family rezoning, the City Council should direct staff to
initiate a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the land use
designation of the subject site to single family residential. )
[WP51\DOCS\AGGIE\PLANNING\PRAIRBND.CC)
_•
EXHIBIT A
_
•---7-7------
.. #4r
- _....
t •
' J....-...:. ..••.'.....
... .. •- \-•••.)"'....%. • .41 ---
• •'.' o.'' -. .....Z
. . . .- ... .• , ..
_ - .... . .• •
. - ' •'
•
- .• - . ...
, .,..... \ .. . .. .--,•
........-.....
•--"--.- ..--•. ..• .
•
• .,
L ' i • .. ' . ...,'•....'"' • .." '#. -•• .
\ .
r ..\... _ _ _-___- 1 ,s _ - _,. _ _
„..........
•
_: ._. , . ..:1____ . .t. s •....
., __. ...... 1. .: le.
, __
.4.44 1
,_ :.--w •
•
,
.... ,..._... _
.. ..• .s.&,. .. •
c .. I__::..•__:____ ... :
• .,„ „ ,
. .. ,
:„.._:......_... , A x,-.3: . •
• • . ..;i ;----; -• -..
• -..____ -• ..,-..,i...,,.. .
_ . •
......1,-......--.. \ : _. ,.__
• .
_-- ••• .....---- .-.4?.._,.._:.; .
.
•
.„:„...-,---,-•=•-=-1------,v,
..---r.--; % =--— 7.-..i ..--:: ' 4 ___,------ •
ILI L aa..L...B.INR•Ila :
'-. •••-7,.. .,4.i
--"....-"-"..---.-'--.--'-'-----IID..a...".IIAM.1.•• 1•••••
I ;•:-.. ! --..----..---
...----, ,4maasm•
------- "'"'''...''....'7f---7•7 ..
-. •-•••:,•••••:,:-:::::•:(4- :\•":: t 1 ;
....--. •
zaili_____I z i r.---7Wgi::.:**i§:::i:K:::,:i::::::.:z 4.• .4:.s ; - ,
:•.:.:.:•*::3:•:::§ r---...-------
ft..., '',,,ft•**:::
.-C'i-- ---Vringinal.; •
i : I f:S6.1..:::: ...t.i**.g.i:::§:i.::::.:::::•R;;Ke.z...:.:.
• • Vt k .-4,7,•1•
ri:Ka0%'.?WVA:Z:Z.:;.-it%.:-:.:-.... ... .4i&VVWZ•Z,r '.::::OnlaW.N.: t .
34#b . ...It eV.- ':.4:::Wg'''Zs'..s....'':.i•':.:%..•-::':%:::::::;r:k1A.:::?;ii1:*g::-•:•?')Z'':4 A:RalnaiW.; . , .
i ! ''• 41::-.:;%:$:{----t---:34-v-.--U:*:40-.:.:§a .:::z.M04.Kii.g.....ig4; i
...,..,...:.:. ....:,- ,N-,.. .k. • . :.4*.N,.:.:,-:2,.;.,:-.:.::".::,.. .:v4x.::::... . .
: .e, .., t :0K5'KA":$:.;'(, -x-..1:%*'''''A‘ ' - x ' .'tiaft:Vef::*KV:*::1-5. ;:i:a.....,• . .
1,e,'.'i'l) ‘.1 I-7 -. ':::',.§:Z.N"k.4-$V".f..'''--.. - 4S14::•;:::t3IM4.•:::-...:',; :•::0:::X5-::::N.-40-%::::::&::i.1
; 2 -i:K::::,x3K:§S.E:K:•.4.4::...::•,...54t..:'%::N.,..‘:',:::''''--------------------'..v,..::.•,..."%Aix.--- -.,...,4i::
1.---,--+.:), •' • .::.::::.:ii:i:K:i::%::?.:::.::::.:n„..--,:.?‘ ::,:..c.#41/ -.iwe‘-...•.-. :-(.z.-0...:4......i-z..:-:::::-,..i:z.,.0.ef,:::-:•..,--: .
, — F---- ::: :::::-.:6.0:*:.::::::::*•:::%sm:::,, ....:.:::::...1.,.,,, ..
s'•••••••,.:''i!.'.'':.'3ii• 2 z"n.1!!I !il: 4'-..-' -.i':-n.-k_*'i.lii.l"iiiA-s'r 2.'.::.::.K*:kii'.:,•...a:m.._iiX,,.:._..'i.t::i:.s..:a-.'W.,iZ:::)k.1:-5.:-.--'..4'•i..::n.•.%.:A::.:A".'::-:':.-..4.f:"....:.i:2::i:,::3'4K,1:f:4*::i"V.A2i..iM.I:::;:::.-".0.,.*....-.V.:.::...;4.:?.:.:.,::'.:...A..:5i2:g5*:MKK:::W::P:::::::.'.::',;":':.. ,,,MM,:+K,•,.-,....e4,,....R,.....,".t',:W:.y'..*:-:.:.::::4..:';:...''l.e..,..PW:,.':,,::f:,‘",:..:.,:*.,.:.,,.:&W.•-.:P,.V.:,0k.,,...4_.,,..„u,:M...i‘,1e,i:f-:-:,,.X..,:E:.K:Zi.::.:A§.:„...:.:.:.:3.:::.M";"::::M::::w::.:::K.v-.:..:,..::..:K4:-..$:.::,i,.v.k.•:%:5:1,..•>2
-- - ZM0 : , .,
. ...... •
r.
.._4;"-,,.;:;_,Vfs‘V::::.--:-:•:---iiIii.:M:•&•:CifO.Fge, -,1§1::,0.-4t:i:Z1%::::•311:
..." ----- ..:Ai.;,%%.•••••-,,;-•::::,N.kiikr.•-•-•.-.;•:::A.-:3::::•§NA,Awtv•-•:KV.-:,:,:c•--::-'$.$1?.:iK::::..
. ., . ..,....-1 : --, 7.....kk...ce:::••••••-::•.5.s.:,:v.,...:•:•;.::wf::::,:::::,..: .. ..:,,Ny::::*•:Kk..,x,41.•K:::::,
., iviw.4t•-•••••:•::::::;..:;::::N::::,§03::-.:iiii,4g.:::,..,,-:,:wza•-.::::A,-%:4:::v4;vxgoc...:•:-...•,..:•--4•
....NK.....::,,k$,..,,,:ik, ..N:::-,v%§&$:RZAK.x.--fd6.::::-..z,:•:.,:.::A.i
. .... _ 1 .
-- --- .."•-•-•,. T
-:-..'.: rAMSW. c
%
•;:i?..:000:10NOW4t,
r -------j
t \ , .•.1.
,
. - ".`A.-.-D...A. •*.tr,‘i..r4n/i
-it.-:..•'k
. \ __ 64wi"-;-'m,_--•.e.:.-.,.:A?_,.:z:--4i:V-m-:-,•:•:,,;:,::::_':,_-::_t'::;',i-K:.:.):i,#-i,4,.i:t;;i,:ii:p:i.-i';7.-:f?4&-7.,'.-4:.„i-t..v-.%::4'.:-':4'S":1..::fl.::;&).„m..sM.:*i:.:I::,.::.o:.::.::'i.m:::::.:"i...„:'*:;:--:.k.:-:„•:,:&"::•.3..:..;•4..,.-i:.i•i.,:..•i:•..,
:.:
:,-::-,::--:.::-:-:,..::-.4:.e...-:s-.-,:t.,-:,::.-.-k-i:o.i::-:-•:::i::i.::is_:;:,::•"••,,:•:::.-.4:.,.w.4:.„,:_:;•:..:•*.a......i,.,..,--.41.,..l..h..,..„...-.:-1
AG AGRICULTURE
,,_..-:
..:
•
.- •
• -. - .
, • • \:•-•`:-..- — --r-,.'%::. , ; : •
•
• • . 11 .14.•,,_ .
•
. •
• -' ...
R1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL
-I 7 2 _I r'.•,>-:-......„::,!.._ 1....?N'
.s.,.- 1"),..,./.... •,..
...r_.
. .: Lac:, •••••••—p• .
• ; . r;„ ; 3 :
.., ••••44.
.133 mm-DENSITY RES.
R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. . .1 ,_.-...2.2_,...„...,_/..........:z./ .., .).
--- ' ...5777-.....,......., . ..
, • .- r _.,......, -*"...v. i ,
— ---.7- L ---. 1- -- r,..>:. . -. _(41,/ : - ' 1--,...,,,•.....,
L.--.1 ,---..- .. , :;_i , -..,,- , .„, , 44/ i
B1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS
132 COMMUNITY BUSINESS '•- r- 1---• r . :-, 1...._:-.4 . -...• ‘......":4„. : ., : : • / . . .%
.-- - : •-, ... --ii 1-,--1-it: i 42:k.. lj... i <..„.: ..• i .. f / i ..„.
_.,..1 ',. .1-.4 t---71-, [ • ,c; t..!-1.. ,•-• ',,,i. . ""..... .. ' ..• ;
,
•-• • N.,, l• •\, ••=t, .. -. • f • ,
..-1. '•------% —L—_______:\
B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS
i * • -' `-' ' -' -•-•.. "-- .. , - ,.. ;
. ....:iii:.:. i...:.--:-..-z.1.. 1:::„--___--' ,....z.,--:--
; .... • __.1......., A----, .. -,-.-- 1.-1 .. -
i 1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL r-,t2 ,:-.i.:_:,.. .174 ,..—__ ...,..., •\- ?AAA \\<;#e"...
--t. .,_, - -' 1-- 7 .......,,. .r.........\1/4 \
12 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
-,- .--es 7. : I ...‘,•-•-: Is:; ,., • ......., i ‘
1....4----; I __________,.. ••‘: :... 1...,.1.:L.1:....... .,\--..*;.: , >s• 1 , s
SSHORELAND B 1 ,.pAA 4 .---•,------ ,. . ; . : ,...1....:....-.14:-)A..........2...."....
..
! .,........._.,.... .•• , \.• . :....4, ...• .....2.... .......7
' 1''':''•- ''..."\st•1.1 tr •'4177"‹,...
1.;'•Ilr':7.A I 9. *-",' ,• s, • -,. . •0'. : '''
. F.,4,;•;:,74& FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT1
- --- ---1.. . R 2"*`( ..*''v-*`• - .
-_ .
• r- 7 ?---- . , • --1" ,.. c:c.,•,___
Ilmitemil• MANDATORY PUD •
• r.-,, ;.7.-,, ..!. .2,;• '...1.------' `.._.2:34....''•'c . ...
I--1 ,------
t.:..1
.....
RTD RACETRACK DISTRIP11 ________,___=.=:i.....i•Ln._•==.--.:-.---- -------
;Q. i •
. I
I •
...• Zoning Map i
. . ,
City • t-,.--.
* of SHAKOPE•E
__ _••_ _________
#►�-4a :
Suite 608 4940 Viking Drive•Minneapolis,Minnesota 55435.612-835-2808
CORPORATION
January 3, 1994
The Honorable Gary Laurent and
Members of the City Council
City of Shakopee
129 S. Holmes Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
RE: Prairie Bend (Lenzmeier)
Dear Mayor Laurent and Council Members:
After informal presentations to the Planning Commission and Council, Sienna believes that
its revised concept plan is a better plan overall, both in conformance to the City's zoning
ordinance and blending/transitioning with surrounding land uses. Sienna will shortly be
reapplying with the new plan for preliminary plat and P.U.D. approval with a goal to be on
the Planning Commission's February agenda. Accordingly, we are hereby withdrawing our
original application for rezoning to R-2 and deletion of the mandatory P.U.D.
We look forward to working with staff, Planning Commission and the Council in bringing a
quality new neighborhood to the City of Shakopee.
Sincerely, yi
. 1 ire .aa(
*11
vaS
J.14.1d W. .o stop
P ; -ct ,ger ) . e�d aeye)cl
r
cc: Dennis KraftGp4 'a-ys�e' Go�?o, a
Barry Stock �o�e �e20a
Lindberg Ekola t.o o,` S-ye
Jim Resop f�
Planners • Developers • Contractors
') R'`r � ,k LSCC..
Shakopee Valley
December 27, 1993
Gary Laurent
Mayor
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear Mayor Laurent,
Please consider our request for appointment of the Shakopee Valley News as the official newspaper
for the City of Shakopee for 1994.
Legal notices published in the Shakopee Valley News during this time period will be billed at the rate
of$6.89 per column inch. A complete guide outlining our procedures and rate structure, as well as
a copy of our certification from the Secretary of State's office which enables us to publish legal notices,
is also enclosed.
Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you in the past. We hope that relationship can be
continued in the coming year.
��
Sincet�ely,
Stan Rolfsrud
Publisher
enclosures
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Valley News as the official
Move to designate theShakop Shakeeee for the year 1994 .
newspaper for the City of
— ,� State of Minnesota
81.`!.°''° "•••.?; SECRETARY OF STATE
%-` ;= .APPLICATION FOR LEGAL NEWSPAPER STATUS
-,...„.!1:&44.,,,,
PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE BEFORE COMPLETING THIS DOCUMENT
THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE FILED AFTER SEPTEMBER 1, AND ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 31, EACH YEAR TO
APPLY FOR LEGAL NEWSPAPER STATUS FOR AN ENTIRE CALENDAR YEAR. APPLICATIONS RECEIVED IN OUR OFFICE
AFTER JANUARY 1.ARE EFFECTIVE FROM THE DATE WHEN THEY ARE FILED AND PROCESSED BY THIS OFFICE,
1. NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS OF NEWSPAPER:
SCOTT 7n x10193
SIIA KOPF: ,TALL"TY NEWS STATE OF MINNESOTA
rn ROX i DEPARTMENT OF STATE
327 VIArS11ALL r'n FILED
s11AKOPEE MN 55379
NOV 181993 J- -)
2. ADDRESS OF KNOWN OFFICE OF ISSUE(complete street address or rural route and ral twynafn 13e
327 Marshall Road Shakopee Minnesota 55379
STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE
3. COUNTY: Scott
4. NAME AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF A CONTACT PERSON:
Mary Tkalec ( 612) 445-3333
A
5. 7
Signa e of uthorized Person •
I, Joan Anderson Growe, Secretary of State do hereby certify that the above listed publication has met the filing requirement for a legal
newspaper as set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 331A.02 subd. 1(i).
This authorization is effectiveazAili-ilanuary 1,or the date stamped below,whichever is later.
_
_A
JoanAnderson Growe
Secretary of State
In order to process this application for legal newspaper status you must return the completed application along with:
A. The$25.00 filing fee made payable to the Secretary of State;and
B. A published copy showing the date of publication,of either 1)the U.S.Post Office 2nd Class Statement of Ownership and
Circulation;or 2)Statement of Ownership and Circulation verified by a recognized independent i ujation_ auditing agency.
74
08921238 Rev.10/93
� SL
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Street Light at Vierling Drive and Marschall Road
DATE: December 28, 1993
INTRODUCTION:
This item was tabled at the December 21, 1993 Council meeting.
BACKGROUND:
Staff has received a request to install a street light on the west side of Marschall Road at Vierling
Drive. The existing street light on the east side of Marschall Road does not provide enough light
now that Marschall Road is a 4-lane divided roadway. At night this intersection is very dark and
potentially hazardous.
Staff has contacted Shakopee Public Utilities Commission(SPUC)to obtain a quote for installing
the light. The estimated cost is $692.16. SPUC has indicated that they could install this light
within one week of receiving the notice to proceed.
In 1988, the City Council discussed street lights on Vierling Drive between C.R. 16 and C.R. 17
and directed Minnesota Valley Electric and SPUC to install additional lights in this street (in
addition to the standard lights at street intersections) and directed staff to fund these lights out
of the Capital Improvement Fund, rather than utilize assessments. The main reasons for this
decision was due to Vierling Drive being a major collector street with high pedestrian traffic and
the lack of adequate lighting due to the long distance spacing of street intersections.
Staff feels that this position would still apply on Vierling Drive. In addition,this intersection will
be a major commercial intersection and is the intersection of a collector street and an arterial
street.
In regards to other safety issues regarding traffic control signs at this intersection, the Scott
County Highway Engineer has confirmed that traffic signals will be eventually installed at this
intersection, once the bypass ramps are open. In the interim, staff has requested that the traffic
control signs in place be evaluated to see if other improvements are necessary (i.e. flashing red
lights on the stop signs on Vierling Drive, etc.)
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Install the street light at City cost.
2. Install the street light and assess the costs.
3. Do not install the street light.
4. Table the request for additional information.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Direct staff to have Shakopee Public Utilities Commission install a street light on the west side
of Marschall Road at Vierling Drive for a cost not-to-exceed $692.16 utilizing the Capital
Improvement Fund because this intersection is located in a major commercial area and is
intersected by a collector and an arterial street.
DEH/pmp
LIGHT
1 / 4 .
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft , Acting City Administrator
FROM: Dave Hutton, City Engineer \>v
SUBJECT: Vierling Drive Street Lights
DATE: November 8 , 1988
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is a request from Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative
regarding the installation of street lights on Vierling Drive.
BACKGROUND:
Last summer , staff discussed the concept of providing street
lights on Vierling Drive due to its collector street status. At
that time , the City Council directed staff to obtain cost
estimates from both SPUC and the Minnesota Valley Electric
Cooperative ( MVEC ) for the installation of these additional
street lights . The existing street light policy is for the
developer or the City to pay for the installation of new street
lights at the intersections only. Due to the fact that Vierling
Drive is proposed to be a collector street with minimal accesses,
staff felt that additional street lights would be warranted . The
City Council agreed and consequently directed staff to obtain the
cost estimates for the additional street lights.
Attached is a response from the MVEC regarding the additional
street lights on their portion of Vierling Drive. As indicated
in their letter, the street lights would be spaced approximately
300 feet apart. This is the normal spacing that is currently
provided for street lights in the part of Shakopee that is on the
grid street pattern. The estimate as shown on the MVEC proposal
is $10,000 .00 for placing the electric lines and street lights on
this portion on Vierling Drive. The developer of Hauer ' s 4th
Addition will pay for the street lights at the intersections of
Emerald Lane and Jasper Road with 13th Avenue.
SPUC has prepared a preliminary design for their portion of
Vierling Drive, which is from Hauer' s 4th to the west. Their
design is based on approximately 300 foot spacing also. This
portion of Vierling Drive is not currently under any development,
therefore, exact street intersections are not known at this time.
Staff and the utility manager feel that street lights should not
be placed on this portion of Vierling Drive until exact
intersections are known. Therefore, they will be submitting a
estimate to install street lights at the time that development
occurs so that the placement of street lights will occur at the
intersections as well as additional spacing. SPUC does feel that
a street light should be installed at the intersection of
Vierling Drive and County Road 17 and will be submitting a
request to City Council for payment to cover this item.
•
If Council chooses to approve of the MVEC proposal and authorize
the installation of street lights on Vierling Drive at 300 foot
intervals , staff would like to remind Council that they will be
committing themselves to pay for these additional street lights
throughout the entire length of Vierling Drive as it goes from
the east to the west along the entire route .
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Approve of the Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative request
to install street lights on Vierling Drive for an estimated
amount of $10 ,000 .00 .
2 . Deny the request.
3 . Request additional information or cost estimates based on
some other criteria.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 , to enter into an agreement
with Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative to install street
lights on Vierling Drive at 300 foot intervals for an estimated
amount of $10 ,000 .00 .
ACTION REQUESTED;
Move to direct the appropriate City officials to execute the
agreement with Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative to install
street lights on Vierling Drive from County Road 16 to Emerald
Lane for an estimated amount of $10 ,000 .00 .
DH/pmp
VIERLING
If Council chooses to approve of the NVEC proposal and authorize
the installation of street lights on Vierling Drive at 300 foot
intervals , staff would like to remind Council that they will be
committing themselves to pay for these additional street lights
throughout the entire length of Vierling Drive as it goes from
the east to the west along the entire route .
ALTERNATIVES :
1 . Approve of the Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative request
to install street lights on Vierling Drive for an estimated
amount of $10 ,000 .00 .
2 . Deny the request.
3 . Request additional information or cost estimates based on
some other criteria .
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 , to enter into an agreement
with Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative to install street
lights on Vierling Drive at 300 foot intervals for an estimated
amount of $10 ,000 .00 .
ACTION REQUESTED; .
Move to direct the _ appropriate City officials to execute the
agreement with Minnesota . Valley ,Electric Cooperative . to install .
- • . street.-lights- Ons- Vierling Drive from County Road 16 ;_ to : Emerald
. .. : Lane for an: estimated amount . of $10 ,000 .00 . •, . - - . - r-..
•
VIERLING ; = - _..
lir.`"I4 i.mss � � Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative
_
20425 Johnson Memorial Dr:ve, P.O. Bcx 125
•, ..-,' ‘•!kg' Jordan, MN 55352 (612)492-2313 11
....,.� - . . - ...w....,......,_......... ........_.,.........,,..�...... ,_ ......_..
,_!r_r•.. . =r" 1.-:.. 1'. :3L
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Dave hilt t C,r;, L3 t v Engineer
City of Srla•,:,c,e,e
Thomas Graham i
1a' - First Ave.
Presicent t Shar.,:.,pee, M'J -,...).f,;'9
Henderson
-dear Dave:
Melvin Ische
Vice President • Enclosed is Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative' s e_tir,at
Norwood
. of charges to install and extend a street liohtino syste
aior:n 13th Avenue from Co. 1d. 1r: to Emerald Lane in Shakopee
Edward Halloran
SecretaryiTreasurer '
Le Center The lights are approximately 300' apart alternatir:a fro
• either side of the street. uslr:o 35' poles witri 12 foot (,leis
Myron Boegeman j arms. Either a 150 or 250 W HPS cobra head unit is ava i l a b i
Shakopee j. at tre sar:le installation charge. The monthly rate would b
HPS �_ -�9. %�� for a 150w and 511. �sf for a 250w HPS. MVEC wil
John Warner maintain the system orovidir:g re-lamDir:D and normal reoair a
New Prague I no extra cost to the city. MVEC would own the lights an
wire system and provide normal maintenance for the rate. (.1
Rodney Marekdo not see the need for a conduit system, therefore, r::, cost
Montgomery have been included. .
George Stauff
Kilkenny •
The costs provided are based on areas ore-graded but no-
; sodded or Planted with trees. Keep in mind that construc-
John Carlson t ion between November 1 and May 1 is sub iect to winte'
Henderson charoes. A c,Doy of the street olar:s would be heloful in corn-
- Dieting this installation. We need to determine where tnf
Donald Frankhauser E: l ichts and wire are to _be installed in the boulevard. If re-
Savage t storation is necessary, we would suggest that the city handl'
this end of it, rather than Day for linemen to do lar:dscaoin:
GENERAL MANAGER or re-soddir:u. .
Roger Geckle(
Thank you for contacting us for inout on the prolect. It is r
understandin,a other proposals sals are being solicited on this or,:
sect as well. Please keep in mind, the project is clear
within !AVEC' s assigned service area and that we would 0000-
any proposal which would not include plans for the C000erati'
to provide the Dower, for this system. Please call us if y,
have any Questions. We look forward to working with you.
•
Very truly _yours,
" .MINN-S0 . VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
a/
on Jabs
Coordinator Developments/L,:,rl' 1 Accounts
Enclosures
Please Sign And Return White Copy With Your Payment As Soon As Possible •,-.
arg:. MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ;w1` _
.;,.y, S 20425 JOHNSON MEMORIAL DRIVE1-Ar'�; ,
JORDAN. t\". X5:52 %` JP
l0?21 492.23i3
REQUEST for ELECTRIC LINE INSTALLATION or ALTERATION
Date October i4 , 19s,`
We, the undersigned. agree to pay S10 , 000 . 0 0 for placing 4 : 2 0e feet of
electric lines in accordance with the sketch below. payable to the Cooperative
prior to installation. Modification of the aereed upon route, or circumstances,
may require revision of cost. This contract is only valid during the current
construction year beginning March 1st of each year and subject to chance
thereafter.
Winter charges will be due in advance on underground services graded and
ready to energize from Nov. 15thru May 15.
X
• sionawre
I _
SKETCH -
1 1 2 l. s/ :—.14,- / R it' • rs4 7.E
_ r %11 ti\ �?� %..._/ \� rf z •
•
I ;III i — (i;— /'_ / :ir:. ..sj r.,..2
<-1t%�,/ `i F ... -� ...
I _.L i / <� •/ ,,,77::11.7/:,, ,_, 6
1 . tt ,\ ice : ' ------- ----- !`~::
(/• {,t j�..c '•�ti�__=J �i / c / 1"coli
. — - •.I• Y._...1 -. _• ' KIK
�i.t !y x J r X17
•
f�� �z-(- _enn-› -n. —� /1 n �J nn ... ._.n,.. 1•.l!1 1.1..n. _
Please Sign And Return White Copy With Your Payment As Soon As Possible --
O11 ';' MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE -�, .
-*i `: 2G-2 JOHNSON !JEV.ORIAL DRIVE 411r.;;". ..;
R^:;"d. I.'•N 55352 J. '.
« (6',27 492.2313
REQUEST for ELECTRIC LINE INSTALLATION or ALTERATION
Dale Octcber 14 15E•S
We, the undersigned. agree to pay S1o , coo . oo for placing 4 , 2CC feet of
electric lines in accordance with the sketch below. payable to the Cooperative I
prior to installation. Modification of the agreed upon route, or circumstances.
may require revision of cost. This contract is only valid during the current
construction year beginning March 1st of each year and subject to chance
thereafter.
Winter charges will be due in advance on underground services graded and
ready to energize from Nov. lsthru May _s.
Y
signature
SKETCH - -
-"--'• if pril—f—fAC 1\ ;X„,, ! 4?... / 3 '41 < / "' 01 3 .i . .._.,
, !xi I / t.:..• 1.4,47 , .:C i .. I_ 4. ./ r
:\ 5:71--(---.--.1.—.--7-. .z.
�/�1 s� . 7.7._4 \_114.. _ . ._
' 9 7"--- I "--I j. 1 - %., ' t... -•/- - :s
7-; 1• ;7`rt i E.( I • ; . ::::: =/_, / ' 1::;':-- / -t / 7:—. .:"g.' ;.Z----.%---7,S1. .6. F2
I.
_-- — • --,':.-“--.N)/
— _ tom / �1:--, 1/I7.:71,,,,,
-
Iis
, f La:, 51'; :,.. ..K_____-______Ii/ . "T":- ., ,. ii-41:-.----f----,4.--:::::—,------7--------.----------------- .. ' -..-_ , N
- i I ! ) I.; :.- 1 ''.--- cz: --
___:-. .... • .z,. • / -7-4 .',..,..,. :=3/. -i \ . .
t ; _�-• �_. 1 l lv
_ / � - _ _ ., Jj = _--'_Y__.
t� � ,yam
cYrr.
•
:' wr `� I IN f if ✓ -F_' -
ll)c
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft , City Administrator
FROM: Dave Hutton, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Vierling Drive Street Lights
DATE: November 29 , 1989
INTRODUCTION:
Attached are two bills from the Shakopee Public Utilities
Commission regarding the installation of two street lights at
separate locations on Vierling Drive .
BACKGROUND:
The normal practice for both the Shakopee Public Utilities
Commission and the City of Shakopee is to install street lights
at intersections only. Since Vierling Drive will be a collector
street with a minimal number of intersecting streets , staff did
not feel that this would be an acceptable level of lighting for
this street. In 1988 the City Council of Shakopee discussed this
idea and agreed that additional street lights should be installed
on Vierling Drive at approximately 300 to 400 foot intervals.
In discussing these additional street lights with the Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission , it was agreed upon that the City of
Shakopee would pay for the additional street lights above and _
beyond the intersecting streets. Consequently, that portion of
Vierling Drive between C. R. 16 and Limestone Drive had additional
street lights installed on it which were paid for by the City of
Shakopee. It was decided that the additional street lights on
Vierling Drive would be constructed as development warrants it.
Shakopee Public Utilities has installed two additional street
lights on Vierling Drive at two separate subdivisions and has
submitted the attached bills to the City for payment. One street
light is in the Meadows Subdivision and the other street light is
in Heritage 2nd Addition Subdivision. Both of these lights are
at intervals beyond the intersecting streets in order to comply
with the overall street lighting plan of Vierling Drive .
Shakopee Public Utilities is now requesting reimbursement for the
cost to install the street lights. As stated in the attached
bills, the cost is $700 .00 for each light for a total cost of
$1 ,400 .00 .
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Approve of the request and direct staff to reimburse
Shakopee Public Utilities $1 ,400 .00 for installation for two
street lights on Vierling Drive .
2. Deny the request.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 .
ACTION REQUESTED:
Move to direct the appropriate City officials to reimburse
Shakopee Public Utilities for the installation of two street
lights on Vierling Drive for a total of $1 ,400 .00 .
DH/pmp
LIGHTS
CUNSEAIT
lSci
.
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director A
SUBJECT: I/I Study �,
DATE: December 29, 1993
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is the final Infiltration and Inflow Study as prepared by Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Shakopee has retained Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. to prepare a Comprehensive
Sanitary Sewer Plan. This plan consisted of four separate elements, one of which was to update
the 1982 Infiltration and Inflow (I/I)report. The remaining three elements of the Comprehensive
Sanitary Sewer Plan are 95% complete, but the final reports are dependent on the outcome of the
Chaska Interceptor negotiations.
The I/I study has been completed and a copy is attached for City Council review. Basically, the
1982 I/I report indicated that the only area where the City had excessive I/I was in the River
District drainage area. Therefore, this 1993 report concentrated on that part of Shakopee.
Updating the 1982 I/I report was one of the goals of the draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan.
Attachment No. 1 is a copy of Page 24.2 of this Comprehensive Plan and policy SS-C indicates
that the City would address the I/I issue in the Central District/River drainage area.
Attachment No. 2 is the summary of the 1993 I/I report outlining the conclusions and
recommendations. Basically, the report concluded that I/I exceeds the allowable limits only
during certain times of the year when the Minnesota River is up. But if the I/I is analyzed for
the entire year, the average I/I is below the maximum limits. Based on this, the most cost
effective solution is to "do nothing" and continue to pay for the excess I/I as part of our treatment
costs at Blue Lake.
If that is unacceptable to the City or the MWCC, other improvement options such as
reconstructing, lining or chemical sealing the River Interceptor were evaluated. A cost analysis
of each improvement was prepared and as shown on the chart on Page 21 of the report, the next
most cost effective solution rather than paying to treat the I/I is chemical sealing.
The report also indicates that a section of the interceptor (between manholes 20 and 28) should
be reconstructed under any of the alternatives due to its poor condition and pipe settlement. This
section of interceptor is between the old 169 Bridge and Market Street.
The report also indicates that the interceptor is on the downside of its 50 year service life
(currently 30 years old) and the pipe should be carefully monitored to determine when complete
rehabilitation will be necessary.
Staff is requesting that the City Council adopted the 1993 I/I Plan.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Move to adopt the updated I/I report dated December 6, 1993.
2. Table the request.
3. Do not adopt the report.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Move to adopt the Infiltration and Inflow Study dated December 6, 1993 as prepared by Short-
Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. as the City of Shakopee's official policy regarding Infiltration and
Inflow.
DEH/pmp
INFLOW
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
a)
0 W N 4-) C r-1 N 0 U) 0 a) O >,
4 (4a S 4 0 -r-I RI U) •-I UJ RI ca a) 4 cc) 4-) r-1 RI
cl-c to O w a) 4a '0 a) U) a) (U v (U >~
Z3 U) C '0 O Ul O of '0 N 0 )-1 3a f-1 a)
.c 4-) a, 0 (U ONS a~ 3a 0 b' a)-4-1 O 4 RI N RI .N C >1
'0 .I) 0 RI •ri RI •ri •ri 0 1~ a) Sa 0 0 RI g )i •.) •--I U) 4J 4•)
a) (1) 0 .Q '0 a) U) r-1 >, •-) .0 RI r-1 a) ITN to S-1 P4 U) 0 '0 C •r1
(1) N .0 0 C r-1 C -I) 0 4. a) )4 4 3 •ri 0 g C a) a) U a) 0 O
4 •r-1 4) N a) RI = (1) 4. •r-1 a) 4 bN 0 a) > U) N 4.1 0 a) 11:3 •1-1 S-1 SA !~ RS
S-1 > 4 RS r 4 r-1 4-1 4-) 0 S-1 U) C .Q r-I S4 0 .4 •ri 4) RS •ri a) .0 a)
134'0 34 S-I '0 4-1 X 4 •r 1 r-4 0 )-i 04 r-1 0 RI 0 RI > •ri a., 0 '0 •N .4"
C (aU 00 3 t0) 0 •4 N (U 0 U) a O)04 C•Hi rI-1 0 cL,4 )4 'S r-I N 0 '0
113 U) X UO) rO 0 C 4 � • W H-1 0 0 •4 C 3 a) 3 � 4 '0 '� i (U '-I rciU •
r--I a) (1) • r-1 C N 4-) 4) N U) 0104-) C •44 >-44 •ri C C CO 4-1 4-) 1~ '0 U)
-ri •ri 4-) 4-I 0 •r-I C •ri 4-1 f6 U) •r1 (1) '0 R3 •I-) C )~ '0 4-1 0 0 C 0 Ql 4-)
0 0 0 C 004-400) 0 .0 •r1 3 4) 4 a) )~ •r 1 O O) '0 r-I 0 0 r-I O) g )-1 g O
C C a) 3 Q4 co 4-) g O) P U) (U d-) 0 U 0 4) Q (U 4-1 W RS '0 •r•1 -r1 al r-i
O 0 g C a) 0 ar •,4 N C 4-) (U )-1 N .>~ .Q S?a••-I >~ 0 -P
O ON 1:3 a 0 4 S2 0 1]0'-1 2, r-1 W01 C WP >, Ul U) >,•ri Ul -ri b" U) a)
U Rs a) 0 -r4 R3 4 a+.O 0 W 4 U a)•ri 4. 4 a) U) • •ri ri +) U a) g 0 >4r-1
4) r-I U) 4 S•1 0 N 0 a) 4 EI '0 g U) EI 4) C to r-1 •ri -ri )-t S-1 N (U
CWC W C 4 W >, C )-1 4) 4 C-r1 03 RS C O W Z R3 r-1 C a) 0 •
(a U) > (a 3 4 - 3 4.) as 0 ,-i ,--1 3 O •ri C O .0 -ri 0 `0 4 O U U) 4-)
4) 0 a) (1) a+ S-I a) •r-1 0 0 U) )a 4-1 • •rl a) • 3-1•rl 4) •ri•r-I VI Q g O .Q -'i a)
•ri .0 4 '0 X O U) U S-i EIC 0 0 3 .0 U) a) '0 03 •) 03 4-1 .N RS S-1 f. )~
ri 4-) 4i O 4-) 0 0 04 O RI >,.0 a) a) 0 >'a RS U! N a) 4.1 ri a+ RI
O 4.) a, N a) 4.4 C 0 S i >,r-1 .0 ri +) 4) r-I a) 4) O S•1 a) a) RI 34-1 r-1 0 .Q a)
0404"0t) a) a) •ri .s~ W 0 0 '0 4-1 r4 0 U r-1 ri .t~ )a S-1 a) 0 (U N S-1 .1:2
O a) C-r-1 5-1 0 .C: 4 )i N '0 0 0 C U >r RI V) 0 r-1•ri }1 r-I 0 0 N V) r-1 .0 0
S-+ a) RI -4 0 )-t 4 a) X C 4 •44•rl 4-)-rt•r.1 S-1 g 0 41 •ri N •I-) a) C Q U) 0 4--)
.- x 4) 4-) CO 4) .C: 0 RI a) U) Sa•4-1 .0 4-) 0 0 C 4-+ 4-I RI 0 +) 0 +) 0 0
a) a) U) 0 4) '0 N .i-) (U 4 'CS +) U C a) U) SA -ri 0 C a) 4-1 -44 a) N RI 4 >~
• a+ S 1 w•ra-c 0 a+ - U 0 0•N a) 4-)•'-4 0 4-4 -'0 U). r1 a) a) 0 4-) 0 tI+-- RI
N 0 '0 0Xri0CC r-1 Ca r. U) S4U3RSa) )1Q) ri 4 )~ 4.1 '00 U
a) S-1 g >, a) 0 .0 a) r-I 4-) (U •r-1 •ria -0 ,Q 0 0 0 4-) 4-) O 3-1 RI 4-) 0 '0 •ri 70 a)
•r 1 a) (U r-1 •r1 tT Cr) •ri C .0 RS 0 ri 0 P r-1•r1 0 •ri a) •r1 .0 U) C > (U 5-1 RI
--rir1 TS 4 tc/) (U -r4r1 al 3 C 44-�r1 0) 4) 34 g N W 0 Z ar 0 3 W Z C IO.1 'O C •- •S�1
U 0 C •I-) r-1 • 0 >,•ri 3 '0 RI •L) •ri N > .Q ••••IN N }) g. •r1 U 0 U) .Q RS 0 a) N
C O C •-) •.0 I-a r-1 $4Z -1-) 00) 0 C W • 4J .Q 0 U) 0 4-1 4-) •
C C•r•l N a) CI N 0 •ri r-I CA RI 4-) O .4" a 04-1 to N •ri • 3-1 N U >a RI CO a-) •ri d'
•ri •44 RI '0 a) U .X RI RI ri U -) 4 0 - )•1 a-) O 0 Lc) a+ )a O) S•1 N
33 0 N 41) -4-1
OW O • OU
E-1 C }A - aP WI04C4 N -POC g or-1NA • 3:14-1)
0 3 C C > a) .0 S-1 RI I~ C 4 4-) RI 0 O a) -ri .I) C r-1 -r1 )a RS U) ar 0
W •ri 0 0 RI .0 EI Ei '0 )-1 •ri 4) r-I >, U U U) •r1 W ri a, C 4.1 W a) 0 s; 3
.0 N S-1 ri fa +) >-, C b' 0 a) - 0 )•1 0 ON Q+ O 0 4 Sa N •ri 4-)
-1-) N M 0 a 0 4) 4 RS 0 4a 4-1 C 0 N 2, 0 0 CI) C C 4-1 a) 4.4 •ri 43 0
•r1 a.) 0 0 -ri • a) •r1 S'a O•ri C )-1 g S-1 O .0 fa•ri W RS r•1 0 4) a) ca >•1'0 0
.Z g r-1 0 0 4) r-1 a 3 O > 0 •ri C C 0 NEI RI N 4.) .0 O N C r I a) U)
•rl 0•e-1 0 •,-1O a.,•U .0 U) a, 0 C N aEh 3) P• •
r-1 0 40a) ri 0 > 4) 4) 4) MOW to a) H W-�rl .0
304-3 = U) 0 •ri RI U) OW al a) r-4 co •J S4 ri • C a) •r-1 04 0) 41 3 (U > 4)
C C -P .0 4-1 C >,.4 a) 4 • RI U) -ri r-1 U a) a) f 1 4-) 4) a) N-ri
>,H O) 0 0) U) 3 5-1 RI 0 cz X 0 >, O) to a+ I; a) .0 U 0 a) O O) .C2 '0 4-(
U) r-I 0 'OM .0 0 C ri 0 R3 .0 4) O W S-1 4 C '0 •r1 (I-I g >'a •i.) W 4) 0 4-) )-I r-1 .Q C .a •r4
ril O )a •ri C) 4 3 (0 EI 4-) CO .SG a+•,•1-r1--1 C 0 0 a) .0 RI 40 ri 00 0
H N 4) U) )-1 S-1 0 0 C •ri TS RI 0 U en U) 4 Q. U1 4 41 •,4 g R3 ri O N (d
O OC4) a) 04OEIOCC4-1a) .CrCRI 0 C W 00 0 0) 0 10
H -l04 )a C EP -4-1000OP U) 4-) 0 4 >1004'0 >1 4-) W0 -44) W S-I
A 0 U I C 0 C Z ' N U) •ri '0 4 0 4 .i2 -r1 g .s~ Q 4 .4 4-) •4-1 RI N 0 S4 cU
O C N U r1 O a) .X ›-Ig 4-1 a) a) 4- U) S4 4 0 U CC 4J C C r-I
Pi .sG 0 0 E O U) -1 0 0 4) •r1 0 C 4) a) 0 '0 RI U) 4- 0 0 0 0 -ri -,.i a) U) >,r 1
P C 0 ri x al 0 -r1 ri •.-1 (U 4.1 4 C O) C N +) U •r1 C g 4 +) '0 r-I (U
,'}",• O to >, o 0 as h a+U >, 1~ 0 o 4- •ri --1 '0 to (U SA 4) •ri U) +) 0 N W
W 3 (U TS r-i a.w RI O S-1 4J S4 •ri 0 4-1 S✓ C •r1 ---4-1 0 0 W 0 ri N > 0
El 3 C a) 0 EI h Ul C aC Qf 0 -44 O) '0 0) 4-1 .0 -ri .ri (U to N )1 a4 )a ---.--1 C O •ri -4-1U) 4-1 (U g -- (U -r1 (U .4' 3 U i-1 C P 0 E 4- r-1 (U C a4 4-14-) 4-) H25044-) 4-
LI) XI
CO O •.i (U r4 4-) .0 0 C '0 4-) N +)U) 0 '0 0 N S-1 •O
C )4 N •r1 -rl O U) )-1 S-1 a) '0
3 0 U) U) R3 W C 0 .0 C C • Z3 a) 0 U •N a+ 4a 3 as • a) a.,4.1 '0
tx •r.i•ri IIs 0 4) W 4 4) ri .J 0 0 '0 a) as •ri 4 '0 -ri (U a, C C 0 -4-1 3 4-I (U
W >-1,-I 4-) r-1 Q. 41 U 3; •i) (U 4) •ri a) g 0 .) 0 '0 (0 RI •r1 >, )a '0 4-1 O a) N
3 4) 0 0 C co O a) 0 ar 0 '0 a• N N a) S-1 -P a) 0 •r-I 4 4) a+ a) 0 N C a)
P -r.I a, O) •ri owN P ar )a 0 0 N -ri co g 0•ri U (U U a) H •ri 4 '0 4) W -ri TS r•i C 4 a) -1
Cl) U 0 R3 r-i a+ O 4) r-i V) X 0 Cr o 0Z (U 00 P U) a) C) U4-1 C -00 A •ri
P •ri C g U) a) a) •ri ri .1-) r i (U r-1 U) •n N C a) a) I~ W 0 (U W +) 0
>4 0) 4) U) N 0 4 a+--1 O )a •r1 a+ > a) P Zs 0 I-+ +) a) P RS C tT
1:4 400 •..i 444004C0 C >1 > PO4 )1003
wow 40X404 (00
Q EI .'Z )-1 r-1 Ei 4) U) 0 '0 4) RS I~ H U) a) 0 P -P a, as P (U -ri '0 s; P H )a W4) 14-14.) 0 )a
H
H
z
co ■ ■ ■ ■
(U .Q 0 `0
I I I I
U) co U) U)
U) U) U) U)
co
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
Section 1 Conclusions and Recommendations
1.1 Conclusions
1. In 1980, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) established
guidelines with an upper limit of 1500 gallons per day per inch pipe diameter per
mile of pipe (gpd/in/mi) of infiltration and inflow (I/I) to help in determining
whether or not a community has potentially excessive I/I. I/I in Shakopee's River
t District Trunk Sewer has a history of exceeding the USEPA's guideline of 1500
gpd/in/mi, as indicated in the 1982 I/I Study. The fluorometric I/I testing completed
in 1992 confirmed that I/I rates in all segments of the River District Trunk Sewer
continue to exceed the USEPA's guideline during certain periods of the year.
2. The draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan suggests a policy to implement I/I reduction
measures when I/I comprises more than 20% of the total flow of a sewer. The I/I
rates measured during 1992, though greater than the USEPA's guideline, are
significantly below 20% of the total flow of the River District Trunk Sewer.
3. The River District Trunk Sewer televising showed a number of active leaks, roots
at some joints, significant pipe settlement, offset joints, low flow velocities, and
.1 considerable sediment in some areas. Surprisingly, most of the pipe sections
themselves are still structurally sound.
4. It appears that the amount of I/I observed in the River District Trunk Sewer has a
direct correlation to the stage of the Minnesota River. This indicates that much of
the I/I is attributable to infiltration due to seasonally elevated groundwater. During
periods of extremely high river stage, submerged manholes may also contribute
inflow to the River District Trunk Sewer.
1 5. Pipe settlement, accumulation of sediment, and excessive I/I in the River District
Trunk Sewer have contributed to surcharged flow conditions extending over 1000
feet upstream of the Rahr Malting discharge during normal operation of Rahr
Malting.
6. Results of the fluorometric testing suggest that infiltration is suppressed when Rahr
Malting is discharging to the River District Trunk Sewer. Hydrostatic pressure on
the outside of the main due to an elevated water table is equalized by the heavy
flow inside the main.
7. The most cost effective improvement alternative is the "do nothing" alternative.
The cost of this alternative would he the cost of treating the I/I. However, treating
the I/I is not considered a long-term solution to the 1/I problem because of likely
changes to MWCC treatment rates specifically aimed at encouraging removal of I/I.
_.I
J 8. Chemical sealing appears to he the next most cost effective alternative for Ill
reduction. Chemical sealing is not considered a permanent alternative due to the
need to periodically repeat the procedure.
J
I/1 Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 1
w.l
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
9. The segment of the River District Trunk Sewer located in Huber Park between the
old T.H. 169 bridge and Market Street (from manhole 20 to manhole 28 on Figure
3) has settled significantly. This segment should be reconstructed under any
permanent improvement alternative.
r� 10. Slip lining the River District Trunk Sewer with a polyethylene liner is considered a
J permanent improvement alternative. However, it would result in an estimated
capacity reduction of about 12% and would cause a surcharged condition of
approximately 6.1' over the top of the pipe at the most critical location. Although
the elevations of basements along the River District Trunk Sewer are unknown at
this time, it is likely that this amount of surcharge would be unacceptable due to the
possibility of flooding basements.
11. Under the reconstruction alternative, the River District Trunk Sewer from
manhole 25 (RD12) to manhole 37 (ED01) would be increased in size from a 21"
diameter to a 24" diameter to accommodate the projected ultimate peak flow (as
identified in the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan) without surcharging. The
reconstruction alternative has a higher cost than the polyethylene liner, the chemical
sealing, or the "do nothing" alternative.
1
12. The polyester resin impregnated liner has the highest cost of the improvement
alternatives. Flow capacity after installation may be as good or better than the
original capacity.
1.2 Recommendations
1 1. Review the I/I policy suggested in the draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan regarding
implementation of remedial measures when I/I comprises more than 20% of the
total flow. Consider either lowering this standard below 20% (to be more consistent
with the USEPA's 1980 guidelines) or stipulating that the I/I removal proceed only
when financially feasible.
2. Funding for a solution to the I/I problem should he sought so that it is available if
treating I/I becomes a less cost-effective solution. (Treatment rates may be
changing to encourage more removal of I/I.)
3. Continue to monitor the evolution of"no-dig" processes and their suitability for this
project. Informal bids could occasionally he obtained from contractors on chemical
l sealing, slip lining, etc. This would allow for periodic updates of the estimated costs
given in this report and review of the financial feasibility of I/I removal.
1 4. Complete an inspection of each property within the River District to determine
compliance with ordinances on sump pumps, roof leaders, and foundation drains,
since reduction of I/I originating on private property is usually the most cost
1 effective I/I to remove.
1
■ IlI Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 2
-44
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
5. Rahr Malting's ability to attenuate their flows to
unk Sewer
should be monitored by the City. If Rahr Malting can reduce their peak istrict rflow to the
River District Trunk Sewer, the City may be able to more seriously consider slip
lining should it significantly become cost effective. (At the present time, slip lining
is unacceptable because it significantly reduces the pipe capacity.)
6. At this time,the"do nothing"improvement alternative should be continued t nued because
it is the most cost effective. However, the chemical sealing alternative could be
further investigated. The City may wish to chemically seal a small segment of the
River District Trunk Sewer and use it as a trial section.
7. The physical condition of the River District Trunk Sewer should be carefully
' monitored during routine maintenance. Information contained in this report should
be used to help identify manholes and castings which may need repair, areas where
root cleaning is needed, and locations where manholes are particularly subject to
inflow due to their susceptibility to flooding. This sewer is already over 30 years old
and is approaching its design life of 50 years. Complete rehabilitation may become
necessary due to deteriorating physical condition, even if not cost effective from an
I/I removal standpoint.
I
I
I
1
J
l
ISI Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota
Page 3
Update of 1982 Infiltration and Inflow Study
City of Shakopee
Minnesota
SEH No. SHAKO2056.00
December 6, 1993
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC .
=SEN
M ULTIDISCIPLINED.
SINGLE SOURCE.
Update of 1982 Infiltration and Inflow Study
City of Shakopee, Minnesota
SEH No. SHAKO2056.00
December 6, 1993
— I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional
Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
David F. Simons
DATE: I — 6C-\R3 REG. NO: 19.9•
AA,j`j42"
REVIEWED BY:,K,/
DATE: December 6, 1993
_ Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
3535 Vadnais Center Drive
St. Paul, Minnesota 55110
(612) 490-2000
_Acsai
5909 BAKER ROAD,SUITE 590,MINNETONKA,MN 55345 612 931-9501 FAX 612 931-1188
ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION
L
L
December 6, 1993 RE: Shakopee, Minnesota
L Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
SEH No.: A-SHAKO2056.00
L
L City of Shakopee
Atm: Mr. Dave Hutton, P.E.
City Engineer/Director of Public Works
129 South Holmes Street
Shakopee MN 55379
In accordance withY our authorization,we have prepared the attached Update of the 1982 Infiltration and
Inflow (I/I) Study. The information presented in this report is intended to supplement the Comprehensive
L Sanitary Sewer Plan which is currently being prepared for the City of Shakopee. This report discusses the
I/I in the River District and the improvement alternatives which were considered for the River District
Trunk Sewer.
LWe would be pleased to review this report with you in greater detail at your convenience.
Sincerely,
k ,"1/4,jie
Lgel R. Boxrud, P.E.
Project Manager
Lymb
L
SHORT ELLIOTTMADISON. WI
HENDRICKSON INC. ST PAUL,MN ST CLOUD.MN CHIPPEWA FALLS,WI
Table of Contents
Certification Page
Letter of Transmittal
Table of Contents
Section 1 — Conclusions and Recommendations 1
_ 1.1 Conclusions
1.2 Recommendations
Section 2 — Introduction 4
2.1 Authorization
_ 2.2 Resources
2.3 Purpose
Section 3 — Background Information 6
3.1 River District
3.2 Minnesota River Stages
3.3 MWCC Lift Station L-16
3.4 Rahr Malting
Section 4 — Approach 11
4.1 Condition of River District Trunk Sewer
4.2 Measuring I/I Rates
4.3 Evaluation of Alternatives
Section 5 — Results 13
5.1 River District Trunk Sewer Televising
5.2 Fluorometric Flow Analysis
5.3 Comparison of I/I Rates
5.4 MWCC System-Wide Evaluation of I/I
Section 6 — Improvement Alternatives 18
6.1 General
6.2 Reconstruction
6.3 Polyethylene Liner
6.4 Polyester Resin Impregnated Liner
6.5 Chemical Sealing
6.6 No Improvement
I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page i
Section 7 — Cost of Alternatives 21
7.1 Cost Summary
7.2 Comparison of Alternatives
Tables
Table 1 Reference Stages of Minnesota River at Shakopee 8
Table 2 Results of March 22, 1992, Flow Testing 15
Table 3 Minnesota River Stages and I/I Rates 16
Table 4 Volume of I/I in Spring of 1992 20
Table 5 Cost Summary of Improvement Alternatives 21
Figures
Figure 1 Location of River District 7
_ Figure 2 Stage of Minnesota River at Shakopee, March - April, 1992 9
Figure 3 River District Trunk Sewer during 1992 Televising 14
Appendix
Al Cost Estimates for Improvement Alternatives
A2 TV Inspection Logs of River District Trunk Sewer, 1977
A3 TV Inspection Logs of River District Trunk Sewer, 1992
A4 Fluorometric Study of I/I in River District Trunk Sewer, 1992
I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page ii
Section 1 Conclusions and Recommendations
— 1.1 Conclusions
1. In 1980, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) established
Lguidelines with an upper limit of 1500 gallons per day per inch pipe diameter per
mile of pipe (gpd/in/mi) of infiltration and inflow (I/I) to help in determining
L whether or not a community has potentially excessive I/I. I/I in Shakopee's River
District Trunk Sewer has a history of exceeding the USEPA's guideline of 1500
gpd/in/mi,as indicated in the 1982 I/I Study. The fluorometric I/I testing completed
L in 1992 confirmed that I/I rates in all segments of the River District Trunk Sewer
continue to exceed the USEPA's guideline during certain periods of the year.
L 2. The draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan suggests a policy to implement I/I reduction
measures when I/I comprises more than 20% of the total flow of a sewer. The I/I
rates measured during 1992, though greater than the USEPA's guideline, are
Lsignificantly below 20% of the total flow of the River District Trunk Sewer.
3. The River District Trunk Sewer televising showed a number of active leaks, roots
at some joints, significant pipe settlement, offset joints, low flow velocities, and
Lconsiderable sediment in some areas. Surprisingly, most of the pipe sections
themselves are still structurally sound.
L4. It appears that the amount of I/I observed in the River District Trunk Sewer has a
direct correlation to the stage of the Minnesota River. This indicates that much of
the I/I is attributable to infiltration due to seasonally elevated groundwater. During
L. periods of extremely high river stage, submerged manholes may also contribute
inflow to the River District Trunk Sewer.
L5. Pipe settlement, accumulation of sediment, and excessive I/I in the River District
Trunk Sewer have contributed to surcharged flow conditions extending over 1000
feet upstream of the Rahr Malting discharge during normal operation of Rahr
L Malting.
i
6. Results of the fluorometric testing suggest that infiltration is suppressed when Rahr
LMalting is discharging to the River District Trunk Sewer. Hydrostatic pressure on
the outside of the main due to an elevated water table is equalized by the heavy
Lflow inside the main.
7. The most cost effective improvement alternative is the "do nothing" alternative.
The cost of this alternative would be the cost of treating the I/I. However, treating
Lthe I/I is not considered a long-term solution to the I/I problem because of likely
changes to MWCC treatment rates specifically aimed at encouraging removal of I/I.
L8. Chemical sealing appears to be the next most cost effective alternative for I/I
reduction. Chemical sealing is not considered a permanent alternative due to the
Lneed to periodically repeat the procedure.
L In Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 1
9. The segment of the River District Trunk Sewer located in Huber Park between the
old T.H. 169 bridge and Market Street (from manhole 20 to manhole 28 on Figure
3) has settled significantly. This segment should be reconstructed under any
permanent improvement alternative.
10. Slip lining the River District Trunk Sewer with a polyethylene liner is considered a
permanent improvement alternative. However, it would result in an estimated
capacity reduction of about 12% and would cause a surcharged condition of
approximately 6.1' over the top of the pipe at the most critical location. Although
the elevations of basements along the River District Trunk Sewer are unknown at
this time, it is likely that this amount of surcharge would be unacceptable due to the
possibility of flooding basements.
11. Under the reconstruction alternative, the River District Trunk Sewer from
manhole 25 (RD12) to manhole 37 (ED01) would be increased in size from a 21"
diameter to a 24" diameter to accommodate the projected ultimate peak flow (as
identified in the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan) without surcharging. The
reconstruction alternative has a higher cost than the polyethylene liner, the chemical
sealing, or the "do nothing" alternative.
12. The polyester resin impregnated liner has the highest cost of the improvement
alternatives. Flow capacity after installation may be as good or better than the
original capacity.
1.2 Recommendations
1. Review the I/I policy suggested in the draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan regarding
implementation of remedial measures when I/I comprises more than 20% of the
total flow. Consider either lowering this standard below 20% (to be more consistent
with the USEPA's 1980 guidelines) or stipulating that the Ill removal proceed only
when financially feasible.
2. Funding for a solution to the I/I problem should he sought so that it is available if
treating I/I becomes a less cost-effective solution. (Treatment rates may be
changing to encourage more removal of I/I.)
3. Continue to monitor the evolution of"no-dig" processes and their suitability for this
project. Informal bids could occasionally be obtained from contractors on chemical
sealing, slip lining, etc. This would allow for periodic updates of the estimated costs
given in this report and review of the financial feasibility of I/I removal.
4. Complete an inspection of each property within the River District to determine
compliance with ordinances on sump pumps, roof leaders, and foundation drains,
since reduction of I/I originating on private property is usually the most cost
effective I/I to remove.
I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 2
5. Rahr Malting's ability to attenuate their flows to the River District Trunk Sewer
should be monitored by the City. If Rahr Malting can reduce their peak flow to the
River District Trunk Sewer, the City may be able to more seriously consider slip
_ lining should it significantly become cost effective. (At the present time, slip lining
is unacceptable because it significantly reduces the pipe capacity.)
6. At this time, the "do nothing"improvement alternative should be continued because
it is the most cost effective. However, the chemical sealing alternative could be
further investigated. The City may wish to chemically seal a small segment of the
River District Trunk Sewer and use it as a trial section.
7. The physical condition of the River District Trunk Sewer should be carefully
monitored during routine maintenance. Information contained in this report should
be used to help identify manholes and castings which may need repair, areas where
root cleaning is needed, and locations where manholes are particularly subject to
inflow due to their susceptibility to flooding. This sewer is already over 30 years old
and is approaching its design life of 50 years. Complete rehabilitation may become
necessary due to deteriorating physical condition, even if not cost effective from an
I/I removal standpoint.
I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 3
Section 2 Introduction
_ 2.1 Authorization
On August 20, 1991, the Shakopee City Council, acting on the recommendation of the
Consultant Selection Committee, selected Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) to
prepare a Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan (CSSP). One of the tasks which was
included in the CSSP was to update the 1982 Infiltration and Inflow (I/I) Study.
2.2 Resources
The resources used in the preparation of this update include the following:
1. Infiltration and Inflow Analysis, 1982
2. Sanitary Sewer Capacity Report, 1974
3. Shakopee Lift Station Facility Plan, 1992
4. Minnesota River Stages from Army Corp of Engineers, 1992
5. City of Shakopee Existing Sanitary Sewer System Database, 1993
6. MWCC Flow Records for Lift Station L-16, 1992
7. TV Inspection Logs of River District Trunk Sewer, 1977
8. TV Inspection Logs/Video of River District Trunk Sewer, 1992
9. Fluorometric Study of I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer, 1992
10. Information on MWCC System-wide Evaluation of I/I, 1992
11. Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities, 1990
L23 Purpose
The 1982 Infiltration and Inflow Analysis made the general statement that the City of
L Shakopee had potentially excessive I/I. In that study, the sanitary sewer system was
divided into nine districts by the use of temporary flow meters so that evaluations could
be made of each district. The analysis indicated that only one district out of the nine
L actually had potentially excessive I/I. The district was located along the Minnesota River
from Adams Street on the west to the MWCC Lift Station L-16 on the east. It was
known as the River District. Other districts had I/I but most of the I/I was attributed to
L inflow into holes in the manhole covers which were typical throughout Shakopee at that
time.
L Since 1982, the City of Shakopee has been using manhole covers with concealed
pickholes on all new sanitary sewer manholes and has also replaced many of the older
castings. Some of the older sanitary sewer lines have been reconstructed in conjunction
with other projects. In addition, many improper connections to the sanitary sewer system
L (e.g. roof leaders, sump pumps, etc.) have been disconnected. Based on this progress
and the findings of the 1982 Ill Study, city staff requested that this update deal
L exclusively with the River District. The River District Trunk Sewer is known to be
particularly suspectable to I/I, especially when the river is high.
L
I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 4
Another reason for analyzing the I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer is the capacity
problem that has been experienced at MWCC Lift Station L-16. A combination of high
discharge levels by Rahr Malting and significant I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer
have contributed to the lift station experiencing flows which exceed the design capacity
during certain periods of the year. The 1992 Facility Plan for improvements to the
MWCC Lift Station L-16 suggests that the lift station will need to be upgraded in the
near future to accommodate a larger flow. Removal of the excess I/I in the River
District Trunk Sewer could reduce peak flows at the lift station.
Finally, the I/I problem needs to be periodically analyzed to determine if I/I reduction
can be cost effective for the City. With escalating wastewater treatment costs and new
"no-dig" sewer rehabilitation techniques being developed every year, I/I reduction can
become cost effective where not previously cost effective. In addition, the Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission has discussed several I/I incentive/disincentive programs
which could eventually result in additional charges to those communities with potentially
excessive I/I.
I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 5
Section 3 Background Information
3.1 River District
The River District is shown in Figure 1. The sanitary sewer system in the River District
_ consists of the River District Trunk Sewer and several lateral sewer mains which pick up
flow from the Central District and West District. The River District Trunk Sewer is
constructed of reinforced concrete pipe and ranges in size from 15" in diameter on the
west end to 21" in diameter on the east end.
Until 1960, the sewage flow from the City was discharged directly into the Minnesota
River through several collecting sewer lines. At that time, a primary sewage treatment
facility was constructed (at present site of Lift Station L-16) and the River District Trunk
Sewer was added to intercept these outlets and convey the waste to the new treatment
plant. The River District Trunk Sewer was initially designed with a 1.0 MGD reserve
capacity for wastes from Rahr Malting Company, which was subsequently connected to
the system in 1967.
The River District Trunk Sewer runs parallel with and is directly south of the Minnesota
River. In several areas, the trunk sewer comes within 30 feet of the river. The 1974
Report on Sanitary Sewer Capacity states that segments of the River District Trunk
Sewer were installed in bedrock below the water table.
3.2 Minnesota River Stages
MWCC records indicate that the flow at Lift Station L-16 increases when the stage of
_ the Minnesota River increases. Based on this observation, it is probable that the stage
of the Minnesota River has an impact on the I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer.
Table 1 shows some of the highest river stages recorded at Shakopee. Figure 2 shows
the river stages during March and the first half of April, 1992. The River District Trunk
Sewer was televised and analyzed for I/I over this same period, so the river stage was
monitored closely during this time.
All information on river stage was obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers. The
Corps has records dating back to 1939. Previously, they had a gaging station at Shakopee
_ which was located downstream of the T.H. 169 bridge. However, that gage was
subsequently discontinued. Levels at Shakopee now must be interpolated using the
USGS Jordan Gage and the Corps' Savage Gage at Port Cargill.
Ill Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 6
„ ,/ tc
/ i
1 • ` f I ow Q� f
—\ „?.1= / is.... i' a)O— r — r
fy '\ I J .s pV) 1—. I V
) 1 ) ,_ 5. /
l! ' oopp ' - I I t {
11 °
j'`` fq �,-� / 1 L ceE ' r
1- I '�\ / 1 I tLo y
IPi . .1 \N_---/ 1 r——1 0 . n S' F§ '5 s
i `` I v F $ E $ Np5
EEEKHE— -. : / 1 I RI 8••I ! ' A
tal
aS '.: 1 0 p I: w
) � � z I O 1
r JJ 1
ul a 0 1 L
-. s In $r /\ � I
.. �� i —��_� \� '�L i
liiiih. 7”
to IL.� N WI
\c/ a \
r� J'tli
I ,/
21 i
—
'Nvk v I r ;i Z v
t 1
z L .�_, .� /�
— a `t� l‘ U� f i \\
F<gvl �4/ � __ t t /\R�`t I/ `�
W` r ` \ `_may
)- + pi iU / I:s 5 / t- \i i—
it.
ti
4 g o
iI
soa �� O
X05 \ .�1` \ c41
g ° \ \.;
— R5I \:-/ 1
— �__.J
TABLE 1
Reference Stages of Minnesota River At Shakopee
Approximate
Maximum
Elevation
Year AMSL
1952 717
1965 722
1969 720
1986 711
1992 708
1993 718
I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 8
IIl0 co
— /
o m
Q) - 0) 0
0
> ( c
o ci
_rT ,- E W
— 7 c0 N >• . co
0 cn o
&
J as0ca n-
� 007
LL
o c 0
a. c a ca a
< c ai13 E
n f E'-93 Q
0
. . . o ai
_ U
0
c) 5 D
0
Z (/)
0
. _ai
oaj
— r r CO C)
i2
0
CB
t
4'7
ca
N 01.-) N
—
• CC C7)
N al 1—
co. CD O 'i.
, 8/ i 0 ca.
Q C I
2
U
O CZ
CU
0)
cC1
4-0
I'. "--
1.-
CC
CC I
C.
N N
CU
L
.
0)
LL
. , Nr:;: I
T-
1f CD
t1) 0 (0 0 L0 0
0 0 0) 0)
CO
— 1SINV lead in uoUenao
aania eloseuu!W 4o e6e's
3.3 MWCC Lift Station L-16
MWCC Lift Station L-16 is located on the east end of the River District Trunk Sewer.
This lift station has been the subject of recent study by the MWCC. In 1992, the MWCC
completed a study entitled "Shakopee Lift Station Facility Plan." The study indicated
that the design capacity of L-16, as well as the River District Trunk Sewer, had been
routinely exceeded during periods of peak I/I flows caused by wet weather in conjunction
with periods of peak production by Rahr Malting. Because of this fact, the Facility Plan
recommended the construction of a new submersible lift station at the site which would
increase the rated capacity of the lift station from 2500 gallons per minute (gpm) to
3700 gpm.
The River District Trunk Sewer is the largest of the two trunk sewers which make up the
total flow to Lift Station L-16. The other trunk sewer is a 12-inch diameter main which
serves the East District and is located further to the south away from the river. Because
the lift station takes flow from both directions, MWCC pumping records could not be
used to directly measure flows in the River District Trunk Sewer. However, MWCC
records for Lift Station L-16 were analyzed and it was found that peak flows at the lift
station closely coincided with peaks in the stage of the Minnesota River.
3.4 Rahr Malting
Rahr Malting's facility is located near the west end of the River District Trunk Sewer.
Rahr Malting's flow is a major component of the flow in the River District Trunk Sewer.
For this reason, the River District Trunk Sewer televising and flow testing work which
was completed in March and April of 1992 had to coincide with periods of low flow from
Rahr Malting. This made the calculation of a base flow difficult since Rahr discharges
almost continuously and at different rates during different parts of the day.
I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 10
— Section 4 Approach
4.1 Condition of River District Trunk Sewer
Part of the scope for this study was to determine the condition of the River District
Trunk Sewer so that improvement alternatives could be evaluated. The River District
Trunk Sewer had been televised in 1977 by Solidification, Inc. The television inspection
logs from 1977 are included in the Appendix of this report. However, a video tape of
the 1977 televising was never saved. Therefore, detailed information on the location,
size, and condition of leaks was not available.
The City recognized the value of having a current video tape of the sewer, and decided
to have the River District Trunk Sewer retelevised in 1992. Solidification, Inc. was hired
to complete the televising work based on their previous experience with this particular
sewer. The television inspection logs of the 1992 televising are also included in the
Appendix of this report.
4.2 Measuring I/I Rates
Several alternative methods of measuring I/I were considered for this study. The method
used in the 1982 Study involved the installation of temporary flow meters to measure
flows in both the dry weather and wet weather periods. The measured flows were then
compared to theoretical flows which had been calculated from water usage records. That
portion of the measured flow that was larger than the theoretical flow was considered
to be I/I. This is not an actual measurement of I/I but is more of an approximation.
However, it is a good way to estimate I/I for larger segments of a collection system.
A more direct and accurate way to measure I/I in a pipe is to measure the flow at each
end of a segment. The unsubstantiated increase in flow between the end points is
considered I/I. Flow inputs between the two end points need to be either plugged or
measured at the point where they enter the line. This method is normally used during
wet weather periods and is typically done during the night when sewer services are not
being used and laterals can be plugged without causing significant backups.
The latter method was chosen for this study. The cost and accuracy of various flow
measuring devices were compared (e.g. V-notch weirs, Parshall flumes, ultrasonic depth
measuring devices, etc.) and it was determined that the fluorescent dye procedure
(fluorometrics) was the preferred method of flow measurement.
The determination of the flow rates by a fluorescent dye analysis is based on the
principle of conservation of mass. A dye solution of known concentration (Ci) is injected
at a constant rate (Qi) upstream of the monitoring locations. Flow rates are determined
at each monitoring point by analyzing wastewater samples for dye concentration (Cs) and
calculating flow rates via the equation (Qi)(Ci) = (Qs)(Cs).
Using this method, the River District Trunk Sewer was analyzed for I/I on March 22,
1992. Pace Laboratories (SEC Donohue) was contracted to do the testing because of
I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 11
their extensive background with fluorometrics. A report prepared by Pace Laboratories
is included in the Appendix.
4.3 Evaluation of Alternatives
The next step in the process was to evaluate the suitability of various improvement
alternatives for the River District Trunk Sewer. Reconstruction, lining, chemical sealing,
and no-improvement options were reviewed. Reconstruction and lining were considered
permanent solutions, while chemical sealing was considered a temporary solution.
The cost of the alternatives were compared over a 50-year period using 8% interest. The
result of this comparison is given in Section 7, and the detailed cost estimates can be
found in the Appendix.
I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 12
Section 5 Results
5.1 River District Trunk Sewer Televising
The televising was done on March 23, April 1, April 2, April 6, and April 8 of 1992.
Televising was intended to be completed coincident with the springtime peak river level
so that leaks due to the high river level could be detected on the video. Televising would
have been done on the day that the river reached its peak (March 11, 1992) except that
the televising crew could not access the manholes due to surcharged flow conditions.
Even during the periods of lowest discharge from Rahr Malting, the sewer remained in
a surcharged condition between March 11, 1992 and March 22, 1992. As the river began
to drop, flows subsided enough to allow the crews to obtain access to the main on March
23, 1992.
Figure 3 is a graphical summary of the 1992 televising information obtained on the River
District Trunk Sewer. The following information is shown in Figure 3:
_ • Service locations
• City's manhole number
• Televising manhole number
• Areas where the mains had settled and were somewhat below the original
grade (camera partially submerged)
• Areas where the mains had settled extensively (camera completed
submerged)
• The manhole rim and pipe invert profiles as shown on construction record
drawings
• The elevation of the river on the day that the televising took place for
each particular reach of the main
• Locations of active leaks that could be detected from the TV video
The televising indicated that the structural characteristics of the pipe were surprisingly
good. The problems occurred at the joints. Many of the joints had settled or opened
allowing roots to penetrate the main. The main had settled significantly in some areas,
and joints had become badly offset. Some of the service taps were protruding or full of
roots. Many of the reaches contained several inches of sediment and/or rocks up to five
_ inches in diameter. Overall, the tape showed a high amount of standing water in the
main. The televising records showed that some reaches contained grease, calcium, and
detergent build-ups on the inner walls of the main.
Most of the leaks which were observed in the main were located east of the T.H. 169
bridge. This could have been due to the stage of the river being at or above the main
on the days that the easterly end of the River District Trunk Sewer was televised. The
absence of leaks observed on the west end of the River District Trunk Sewer could have
been because the river was below the main on the days that the westerly end was
televised. Some of the heavy leaks were estimated to be flowing at up to 5gpm. (See
photos 9 and 10 in the back of the 1992 televising report, Appendix A3.)
I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 13
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 14
5.2 Fluorometric Flow Analysis
The flow testing was performed during low flow conditions in the early morning hours
of March 22, 1992. The flow testing was originally scheduled to coincide with the peak
river stage which occurred on March 11, 1992, but the surcharged conditions prevented
manhole access. A detailed description of the flow testing is given in the Appendix. A
brief summary of the results is provided in Table 2.
TABLE 2
Results of March 22, 1992, Flow Testing*
Pipe
From To Distance Pipe Size I/I Velocity Capacity
Manhole Manhole (feet) (inches) (gpd/in/mi) (ft/sec) I/I(cfs) (cfs) %I/I
3 8 1149 15 1500 1.13 .0076 2.76 0.3
(RD44) (RD35)
12 25 2681 18 3608 0.73 .0510 3.65 1.4
(RD25) (RD12)
25 37 3999 21 3006 1.21 .0740 4.21 1.8
(RD12) (ED01)
`The section between manhole 8 and manhole 12 was excluded from the study due to unpredictable flow inputs from Rahr Malting and
inaccessible manhole locations.
The following observations were made during the fluorometric flow analysis:
— • The measured I/I ranged from 1500 to 3608 gpd/in/mi. These rates are excessive
considering that Ten States Standards recommends a maximum allowable infiltration
rate of 200 gpd/in/mi for new construction and many municipal codes limit the
acceptable infiltration rate to 100 gpd/in/mi for new construction. The USEPA's 1980
guideline was 1500 gpd/in/mi for determining whether or not a community had
potentially excessive I/I.
• The average measured flow velocity ranged from 0.73 to 1.21 fps with the pipe flowing
less than half full during low flow hours. These values are low and indicate that an
accumulation of solids will continue to occur when the pipe is flowing less than half
full. However, a cleansing velocity of greater than 2.0 fps is expected to occur daily
minimizing additional sediment buildup.
• Several inches of accumulated solids were observed within all manholes which were
entered.
• Surcharged flow conditions were observed in manhole 2 (WD45R) approximately 1000
feet upstream of the Rahr Malting discharge input under normal operation of Rahr
Malting. This implies that Rahr's discharge may be backing up the line.
I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 15
• Significant inflow was observed in manhole 25 (RD12) through several holes on the
west side of the manhole just above the crown of the upstream pipe.
• Figure 3 of the fluorometrics report showed an increase in flow rate from the start of
testing for Section 1. This testing occurred immediately after Rahr Malting's discharge
ended. The increase in flow rate suggests that infiltration may be suppressed when
Rahr Malting is discharging into the River District Trunk Sewer.
5.3 Comparison of I/I Rates
The 1982 I/I Study indicated that the peak seven day I/I period in the River District
occurred between May 18, 1982, and May 24, 1982. The average I/I rate over this period
was measured to be 4860 gpd/in/mi. This same report estimated that the maximum peak
seven day I/I rate occurred between August 30, 1979, and September 5, 1979, with an
average I/I rate of about 5855 gpd/in/mi.
In contrast, the maximum I/I rate measured on March 22, 1992, was 3608 gpd/in/mi
between manholes 12 (RD25) and 25 (RD12). The difference in I/I between the three
time periods listed above could be due to the different river stages and/or the
rehabilitation work that was done by the City since 1979. Table 3 lists the river stages
and I/I rates for the various time periods discussed above.
TABLE 3
Minnesota River Stages and I/I Rates
Stage of Approximate
Minnesota River I/I Rate
Date at Shakopee (gpd/in/mi)
September 3, 1979 706.0 5855'
May 21, 1982 697.1 48602
March 22, 1992 704.2 3608'
'Estimated in 1982 I/1 Study.
'Measured in 1982 I/I Study.
'Measured in 1993 Update of 1/1 Study.
5.4 MWCC System-wide Evaluation of I/I
During 1991 and 1992, the MWCC conducted a system-wide evaluation of I/I in the
Metropolitan Disposal System. Approximate I/I figures for each community were
estimated based on metering information obtained by the MWCC for the years of 1989
and 1990.
The results of the MWCC study indicated that Shakopee had a relatively low peak ratio
during 1989 and 1990. The peak ratio was defined as the average of the three highest
peak day flows divided by the average daily flow. The peak ratio was a measure of each
community's susceptibility to I/I. Shakopee's peak ratio was in the 1.0 - 1.5 range, which
I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 16
was relatively low compared to adjacent communities such as Eden Prairie, which had
a peak ratio in the range of 2.5 — 3.0.
The MWCC estimated that the average ground water infiltration during 1989 and 1990
was about 739 gpd/inlmi in sewer mains owned by the City of Shakopee. The average
of the three highest rainfall dependent I/I peaks during 1989 and 1990 was about
1580 gpd/in/mi in sewer mains owned by the City of Shakopee.
These I/I Rates were lower than the instantaneous I/I rates measured by the fluorometric
analysis on the River District Trunk Sewer. This is because the MWCC I/I rates were
average rates for all sewer mains owned by the City of Shakopee, which would include
new (tight) mains and mains above the water table. This suggests that Shakopee's
citywide I/I rate is relatively low and the City's past efforts to reduce I/I have been
beneficial.
I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 17
Section 6 Improvement Alternatives
6.1 General
The results of the televising and the fluorometric flow analysis show that the River
District Trunk Sewer is in need of improvement if the I/I rate is to be reduced to a level
which is below the recommended allowable I/I rate. Reconstruction, lining, chemical
sealing, and the no-improvement option were analyzed to determine their suitability for
this application. A description of each alternative is given in this section. Estimated
costs are given in Section 7.
6.2 Reconstruction
Under this alternative, the River District Trunk Sewer would be removed and replaced
from manhole 1 (WD01) to manhole 37 (ED01). The total length of reconstruction
would be 9100 feet. The pipe sizes and grades would be the same as the original
installation, except for the segment from manhole 25 (RD12) to manhole 37 (ED01).
This segment would be increased in size from a 21" diameter to a 24" diameter to
accommodate the projected ultimate peak flow as identified in the Comprehensive
Sanitary Sewer Plan without surcharging. This alternative would include a new jacked
crossing under the old T.H. 169 bridge. Bypass pumping would be required during the
entire reconstruction.
6.3 Polyethylene Liner
Several different types of liners were investigated for the River District Trunk Sewer.
A "U-Liner" (tight fitting polyethylene liner) was determined to be unsuitable for the
River District Trunk Sewer because it is only manufactured in sizes up to 15" in
diameter.
Slip lining using a loose fitting, high density polyethylene pipe has some potential for this
type of an application. Slip lining would involve excavating insertion pits at
_ approximately 800-foot intervals and pulling an undersized liner through the existing
main. The roughness coefficient of the liner is less than that of concrete pipe, which
tends to increase the capacity of the pipe. However, installation of a loose fitting liner
significantly decreases the diameter of the pipe which decreases the capacity. The result
is a net reduction in the capacity of about 12%. The wall thickness of the liner is
designed to withstand hydrostatic pressure due to rising river levels and internal pressure
under surcharged conditions.
Bypass pumping and cleaning of the main would be necessary for the slip lining
procedure. Excavation of service wyes would also be necessary to make the service
connections.
Ill Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 18
L
The segment of the River District Trunk Sewer located in Huber Park between the T.H.
169 bridge and Market Street (from manhole 20 to manhole 28 on Figure 3) has settled
significantly. Slip lining of this segment would not solve the problem of low velocities
and excessive deposition of solids. Therefore, the cost estimates have been based on the
reconstruction of this segment in Huber Park, rather than slip lining.
L 6.4 Polyester Resin Impregnated Liner
L Polyester resin impregnated liner is another type of pipe liner that is sometimes used in
applications such as this. Insituform is the most widely used polyester resin impregnated
liner. The impregnated liner material is fed into the main through the manholes, forced
into the pipe under pressure, and is chemically bonded to the interior of the pipe
through an inversion process. Insertion pits are not required. Prior to installation of the
liner, the main is cleaned and televised to locate service locations. After installation of
the liner, a remote controlled cutter is sent through the pipe to cut holes in the liner at
�. the service locations. Flow capacity after installation may be as good or better than the
original capacity.
LAs with the polyethylene liner, the cost estimates have been based on the reconstruction
of the segment located in Huber Park, rather than lining.
L 6.5 Chemical Sealing
L Chemical joint repair is accomplished from the inside of the pipe by locating the
deteriorated area via a TV camera and pumping a chemical grout into the area to seal
off any leakage. The sealed leak is then pressure tested. Pipe cleaning and bypass
pumping is necessary during the process.
The advantages to chemical sealing are the relatively low cost and the fact that no
Lexcavation is necessary to complete the chemical sealing.
One of the disadvantages to chemical sealing is that roots and hydrostatic pressure may
L eventually push the chemical sealant back into the pipe over a period of time. Although
there are documented cases where certain types of chemical sealing have been in place
over 20 years without the need for repair, the cost comparisons in this study include the
cost of a replacement sealing at 10 years, and an extra televising inspection at 10 years,
1, so as to be more comparable in value to the other alternatives.
L Other disadvantages are that it is sometimes difficult to obtain a satisfactory pressure
test, and the cost of chemical sealing is difficult to estimate prior to actually doing the
work.
L„ In the pipe rehabilitation industry, chemical sealing is typically thought of as a temporary
alternative solution to the problem. Since it is not a permanent solution like
L reconstruction or lining, it is not considered equal to these alternatives. For this reason,
it was not felt necessary to include the cost for reconstruction through Huber Park with
the chemical sealing alternative.
L
L I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 19
L
L6.6 No Improvement
1 The "no improvement" alternative consists of paying the cost for the treatment of I/I.
According to the MWCC, the average sewage treatment cost for all users in 1992 was
$1155 per million gallons of sewage. This cost is expected to increase annually by 1-2%
Lover and above the cost of inflation.
Table 4 shows that the approximate volume of I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer in
L the spring of 1992 was 3.14 million gallons (MG). Based on information received from
the Army Corps of Engineers, it is not unusual to expect a fall peak in the Minnesota
River level similar to the spring peak level. Assuming a similar peak in the fall, the total
L volume of I/I from the spring and fall peaks would be approximately 6.28 MG. Using
a factor of 1.5 to account for additional I/I throughout the rest of the year, or for higher
I/I rates when the river level is higher than when measured, the total estimated volume
L. of I/I that would be generated in a typical year would be about 10 MG. Using the
average sewage treatment cost of $1155 per MG, an estimated $12,000 would be spent
by the City of Shakopee to treat I/I in a typical year.
LThe costs given in the next section for treating the I/I are based on an annual increase
in treatment cost of about 2% per year (over and above the cost of inflation).
L
TABLE 4
Volume of I/I in Spring •of 1992
L
Measured
L.
I/I Rate Number'''
Reach of River March, High Low Average of Days River Volume of UI,
District Trunk 1992 Invert Invert Invert was Within 1' Spring, 1992
Sewer (GPM) Elevation Elevation Elevation of Pipe Invert (MG)
LRD 45 to RD 44 1.2' 708.09 707.13 707.61 2 0.0035
RD 44 to RD 28 3.4 707.13 704.27 705.70 15 0.0734
L. RD 28 to RD 25 9.7' 704.27 703.35 704.16 20 0.2794
RD 25 to RD 12 22.9 703.35 700.05 701.70 28 0.9233
L RD 12 to ED 01 33.2 699.80 696.18 697.99 39 1.8645
LApproximate Total Volume III = 3.14 MG
'I/I was not measured on these segments, but was estimated using I/I rates measured on adjacent segments.
2Assumes a one foot gradient on water table from trunk sewer location towards river.
L3Based on river stage shown in Figure 2.
L
L
L I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 20
Section 7 Cost of Alternatives
7.1 Cost Summary
Table 5 gives a cost summary of the improvement alternatives. The detailed cost
estimates are found in the Appendix of this report. In the calculation of present worth
and equivalent annual cost, routine inspection and cleaning costs were not included if
they were common to all alternatives.
TABLE 5
Cost Summary of Improvement Alternatives'
Alternative Present Worth' Equivalent Annual Cost' Initial Cost
Reconstruction $875,000 $72,000 $875,000
Polyethylene Liner3.4 $610,000 $50,000 $610,000
Impregnated Liner' $975,000 $80,000 $975,000
_ Chemical Sealing $475,000 $40,000 $260,000
Treat I/I $195,000 $16,000 $12,000
'All costs include 10% contingencies and 25% overhead.
'Present worth and equivalent annual cost based on 50-year period and 8% interest for all alternatives.
3Results in an approximate 12% reduction in capacity.
4Includes reconstruction through Huber Park.
7.2 Comparison of Alternatives
Treating I/I appears to have the lowest equivalent annual cost of the improvement
alternatives. However, treating the I/I is not a solution to the problem, and I/I will only
continue to increase over time.
Chemical sealing appears to be the most cost effective of the remaining alternatives. In
the past, chemical sealing has not usually been considered a permanent solution to
extensive infiltration problems. However, with some installations now being in place over
20 years, this may be a good interim solution that could be considered for the River
District Trunk Sewer.
Slip lining with a loose fitting polyethylene liner is the next most cost effective
alternative. The disadvantage to slip lining is the estimated capacity reduction of about
12%. This would result in a surcharged condition at ultimate development of the River
District. The amount of surcharging would be approximately 6.1' over the top of the
pipe at the most critical location. Although the elevations of basements along the River
District Trunk Sewer are unknown at this time, it is likely that this amount of surcharging
would be unacceptable due to the possibility of flooding basements.
I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 21
The next most cost effective alternative would be reconstruction. One of the advantages
of reconstruction would be the opportunity to increase the size of the River District
Trunk Sewer between manhole 25 (RD12) and manhole 37 (ED01) to accommodate the
_ projected ultimate peak flow without any surcharging.
Finally, the polyester resin impregnated liner appears to be the most expensive
alternative. This type of liner is best suited for large sewer mains having few services and
located in an area where there is significant restoration costs involved with
reconstruction.
I/I Study for Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
Shakopee, Minnesota Page 22
APPENDIX Al
COST ESTIMATES FOR IMPROVEMENT ALTERNATIVES
_ Shakopee, Minnesota
Present Worth and Equivalent Annual Cost
of Alternatives for River District Trunk Sewer
I. Present worth and equivalent annual cost calculations were based on a 50-year life analysis and
8% interest. No salvage value was assumed at the end of the 50-year period.
II. Reconstruction,lining,and chemical sealing cost calculations assumed that all I/I was removed due
to the improvement.
III. Costs that would be common to all alternatives were not included in the analysis:
_ A. Manual inspection every 5 years @ $1,000/inspection.
B. Thorough cleaning every 10 years @ $12,000/cleaning.
C. Televising beginning at 20 years and occurring every 10 years thereafter @ $6,000/televising.
IV. Reconstruction
A. No additional costs within 50 year life so present worth equals initial cost.
B. Equivalent annual cost = $875,000 x (A/P, 8, 50) = $875,000 x 0.08174 = $71,523.
V. Polyethylene Liner
A. No additional costs within 50 year life so present worth equals initial cost.
B. Equivalent annual cost = $610,000 x (A/P, 8, 50) = $610,000 x 0.08174 = $49,861.
VI. Polyester Resin Impregnated Liner
A. No additional costs within 50 year life so present worth equals initial cost.
B. Equivalent annual cost = $975,000 x (A/P, 8, 50) = $975,000 x 0.08174 = $79,697.
VII. Chemical Sealing
A. Assume one additional televising is required at 10 years.
B. Assume resealing is required every 10 years.
_ C. Present Worth
= $260,000 + $266,000 x (P/F, 8, 10) + $260,000 x (P/F, 8, 20)
+ $260,000 x (P/F, 8, 30) + $260,000 x (P/F, 8, 40)
= $260,000 + ($266,000 x 0.46320) + ($260,000 x 0.21455)
+ ($260,000 x 0.09938) + ($260,000 x 0.04603)
= $476,801
D. Equivalent annual cost
— = $476,801 x (A/P, 8, 50) = $476,801 x 0.08174
= $38,974
VIII. Treat I/I
A. Assume that the main will need to be spot repaired on an emergency' basis every 5 years
@ $5,000.
B. Assume that one additional televising will be required at 10 years.
C. Based on information provided by the MWCC, the cost of sewage treatment is expected to
increase by about 1-2% per year over the rate of inflation. This equates to an average
increase of about $29 per year per million gallons of sewage, or $290 per year for the
estimated 10 million gallons of I/I in the River District Trunk Sewer in a typical wet year.
D. Present Worth
= $11,550 x (P/A, 8, 50) + $290 x (P/G, 8, 50) + $5,000 (P/F, 8, 5 to 45 by 5)
+ $6,000 x (P/F, 8, 10)
= ($11,550 x 12.2330) + ($290 x 139.5928) + ($5,000 x 2.0640) + ($6,000 x 0.46320)
= $194,872
E. Equivalent annual cost
= $194,872 x (A/P, 8, 50) = $194,872 x 0.08174 = $15,929
Shakopee, Minnesota
Reconstruction of River District Trunk Sewer
Preliminary Cost Estimate
_ Unit Total
Description Unit Oty. Price Price
Mobilization L.S. 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Temporary Bypass Pumping L.S. 1 30,000.00 30,000.00
Remove Sanitary Sewer L.F. 9,100 5.00 45,500.00
Remove Sanitary Manhole Each 35 100.00 3,500.00
- Temporary Fencing L.F. 9,100 1.50 13,650.00
Bale Checks Each 250 6.00 1,500.00
Clear and Grub Acre 7.5 3,000.00 22,500.00
- Crushed Rock Pipe Foundation Ton 2,205 7.00 15,435.00
Agg. Base, Cl. 5 C.Y. 210 16.00 3,360.00
Replacement Backfill Ton 2,205 4.00 8,820.00
_ Traffic Control L.S. 1 5,000.00 5,000.00
Jack-Bore 18" Carrier in 30" Casing L.F. 130 250.00 32,500.00
2" Bituminous Restoration S.Y. 856 6.00 5,136.00
15" RCP 0' - 10' Deep L.F. 1,130 25.00 28,250.00
- 15" RCP 10' - 15' Deep L.F. 470 29.00 13,630.00
18" RCP 0' - 10' Deep L.F. 3,091 26.00 80,366.00
18" RCP 10' - 15' Deep L.F. 790 30.00 23,700.00
-- 24" RCP 0' - 10' Deep L.F. 2,209 32.00 70,688.00
24" RCP 10' - 15' Deep L.F. 660 38.00 25,080.00
24" RCP 15' - 20' Deep L.F. 750 44.00 33,000.00
Standard Manhole, 8' Depth Each 35 900.00 31,500.00
-
Excess Depth Standard Manhole L.F. 82 100.00 8,200.00
Temporary Barricades L.F. 48 28.00 1,344.00
4" PVC Service Pipe L.F. 155 6.00 930.00
-
4" PVC Riser Pipe L.F. 40 12.00 480.00
Service Connection Each 31 100.00 3,100.00
Silt Fence Preassembled L.F. 9,100 $2.00 18,200.00
- Salvaged Topsoil C.Y. 3,850 6.00 23,100.00
Sodding, Lawn Type S.Y. 21,506 2.00 43,012.00
Seeding Acre 3.0 250.00 750.00
_ Seed, Mixture 600 Lb. 200 6.00 1,200.00
Mulch Material, Type 1 Ton 6 170.00 1,020.00
Disk Anchoring Acre 3.0 85.00 255.00
_ Wood Fiber Blanket S.Y. 10,000 2.50 25,000.00
Comm. Fertilizer Analysis 12-12-12 Lb. 310 1.00 310.00
Subtotal $635,016.00
- 10% Contingencies 64,984.00
Subtotal $700,000.00
25% Eng., Legal, Admin. 175,000.00
- Total Estimate: $875,000.00
Shakopee, Minnesota
Polyethylene Liner
(With Reconstruction Through Huber Park)
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Unit Total
Description DAt Qty. Price Price
Mobilization L.S. 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
Cleaning and Polyethylene Liner L.F. 6,734 40.00 269,360.00
Temporary Bypass Pumping L.S. 1 10,000.00 10,000.00
- Remove Sanitary Sewer L.F. 2,362 5.00 11,810.00
Remove Sanitary Manhole Each 7 100.00 700.00
Temporary Fencing L.F. 2,366 1.50 3,549.00
- Bale Checks Each 36 6.00 216.00
Clear and Grub Acre 2.0 3,000.00 6,000.00
Crushed Rock Pipe Foundation Ton 661 7.00 4,627.00
Traffic Control L.S. 1 2,000.00 2,000.00
18" RCP 0'-10' Deep L.F. 748 26.00 19,448.00
18" RCP 10'-15' Deep L.F. 470 30.00 14,100.00
24" RCP 0'-10' Deep L.F. 868 32.00 27,776.00
24" RCP 10'-15' Deep L.F. 220 38.00 8,360.00
24" RCP 15'-20' Deep L.F. 60 44.00 2,640.00
Standard Manhole, 8' Depth Each 7 900.00 6,300.00
- Excess Depth Standard Manhole L.F. 25 100.00 2,500.00
Temporary Barricades L.F. 32 28.00 896.00
4" PVC Service Pipe L.F. 15 6.00 90.00
- 4" PVC Riser Pipe L.F. 8 12.00 96.00
Service Connection Each 31 100.00 3,100.00
Connect to Existing Manhole Each 2 150.00 300.00
Silt Fence Preassembled L.F. 2,366 2.00 4,732.00
-
Salvaged Topsoil C.Y. 1,010 6.00 6,060.00
2" Bituminous Restoration S.Y. 505 6.00 3,030.00
Agg. Base, Cl. 5 C.Y. 210 16.00 3,360.00
- Seeding Acre 2.0 250.00 500.00
Seed, Mixture 600 Lb. 143 6.00 858.00
Mulch Material, Type 1 Ton 4 170.00 680.00
- Disk Anchoring Acre 2.0 85.00 170.00
Wood Fiber Blanket S.Y. 7,000 2.50 17,500.00
Comm. Fertilizer Analysis 12-12-12 Lb. 209 1.00 209.00
Subtotal $440,967.00
10% Contingencies 49,033.00
Subtotal $490,000.00
- 25% Eng., Legal, Admin. 120,000.00
Total Estimate: $610,000.00
Shakopee, Minnesota
Polyester Resin Impregnated Liner
(With Reconstruction Through Huber Park)
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Unit Total
Description Unit Qty Price Price
Mobilization L.S. 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
Cleaning and Impregnated Liner L.F. 6,734 80.00 538,720.00
Temporary Bypass Pumping L.S. 1 10,000.00 10,000.00
Remove Sanitary Sewer L.F. 2,362 5.00 11,810.00
Remove Sanitary Manhole Each 7 100.00 700.00
Temporary Fencing L.F. 2,366 1.50 3,549.00
- Bale Checks Each 36 6.00 216.00
Clear and Grub Acre 2.0 3,000.00 6,000.00
Crushed Rock Pipe Foundation Ton 661 7.00 4,627.00
- Traffic Control L.S. 1 2,000.00 2,000.00
18" RCP 0'-10' Deep L.F. 748 26.00 19,448.00
18" RCP 10'-15' Deep L.F. 470 30.00 14,100.00
24" RCP 0'-10' Deep L.F. 868 32.00 27,776.00
24" RCP 10'-15' Deep L.F. 220 38.00 8,360.00
24" RCP 15'-20' Deep L.F. 60 44.00 2,640.00
Standard Manhole, 8' Depth Each 7 900.00 6,300.00
- Excess Depth Standard Manhole L.F. 25 100.00 2,500.00
Temporary Barricades L.F. 32 28.00 896.00
Connect to Existing Manhole Each 2 150.00 300.00
- Silt Fence Preassembled L.F. 2,366 2.00 4,732.00
Salvaged Topsoil C.Y. 1,010 6.00 6,060.00
2" Bituminous Restoration S.Y. 505 6.00 3,030.00
Agg. Base, Cl. 5 C.Y. 210 16.00 3,360.00
Seeding Acre 2.0 250.00 500.00
Seed, Mixture 600 Lb. 143 6.00 858.00
Mulch Material, Type 1 Ton 4 170.00 680.00
Disk Anchoring Acre 2.0 85.00 170.00
Wood Fiber Blanket S.Y. 7,000 2.50 17,500.00
Comm. Fertilizer Analysis 12-12-12 Lb. 209 1.00 209.00
Subtotal $707,041.00
10% Contingencies 72.959.00
Subtotal $780,000.00
25% Eng., Legal, Admin. 195,000.00
Total Estimate: $975,000.00
Shakopee, Minnesota
Chemical Sealing of River District Trunk Sewer
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Unit Total
Description ni Oty. Price Price
Mobilization L.S. 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
Cleaning and Joint Sealing L.F. 9,100 18.00 163,800.00
Bypass Pumping L.S. 1 15,000.00 15,000.00
Subtotal $188,800.00
10% Contingencies 21,200.00
Subtotal $210,000.00
25% Eng., Legal, Admin. 50,000.00
Total Estimate: $260,000.00
APPENDIX A2
TV INSPECTION LOGS OF RIVER TRUNK SEWER, 1977
SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT
,°tr �'►Z 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: Move-rnber lo, 1977 PAGE NO, 1
Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of `;h lkopee
11P7 PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: .uue
ON: right of wary ,:nuth of river
FROM: TO:
LINE: SIZE: 15 Inches (dia.) _ ar Ft. (length) X SANITARY
DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM
AGE: New X Old 17 Years
TYPE: Clay PVC x Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt
X Other easement
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
— , X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream
-- _. --
Film Photo
r REMARKS IFt. , No.
CO MH 2
75-90 Low pipe 1-7" low
102 Offset joint 3/8-1/2" side
113 Small roots in joint 1
208 Offset joint 3/8-1/2" side
313-323 Low pipe 1-2"
39C MH 3
Grade and :.tructure good
TV INSPECTION REPORT
SOLIDIFICATION, INC,
�%o,t 'C4 DATE: Nc-vembcr 16. 1977 PAGE NO. 9 —
620 Cottonwood Lane
,; iFOR: City of ''h- i:onee
Minneapolis, MN 55441
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: ,ame
' •� / ON: ri-lit nt t• y �:sh of ,-iter —
/' i FROM: TO:
,
LINE: SIZE: 15 Inches (dia.) _iii Ft. (length) SANITARY
DEPTH: Ft, PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM
AGE: New X Old t7 Years
TYPE: Clay PVC y Concrete _
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: ;; Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt
X Other eaement
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good _ Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped _ Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream -"
Ft. Fr, Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS LFt, No. —
t .
( , Mui 3
—
12-2(' Lou nine 1-?" lot:
80-1(14 Low ni.oe 2-j"
95 He vv roots in Joint 9
130-146 Low nine 2-3" low —
184 Haavy root,: in joint Z
7C9 Light root:: in joint
250-'56 High length of pipe
'i-)6 1iH 4
_L
Lot of dirt iz bottom of pipe first 50_ fr. _from Mui
L.
Grade margin:11; structure good.
L
1
SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT
o,.O'� 'C.1,, DATE: Novemh�: 16, 'i
620 Cottonwood Lane1 7 PAGE NO. 3
�
= Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of `hikor,ee
71V
: alif PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same
4,1ON: right of way south of river
11 FROM: TO:
LINE: SIZE: 15 Inches (dia.) 377 Ft. ( length) X SANITARY
DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM
AGE: New X Old 17
Years
TYPE: Clay _r PVC ?" Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt
X Other easement
"- MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
-- X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: • Upstream X Downstream
Fc, Fr, Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS Ft. No.
0(' M'1 4
1? Wife joint
19n! Light roots in joint (typical) 4
202 Light root ; in joint
230-23E Low pipe 1-2" low
238 High joint
288 Se.vice R tap 5
310 Root; in joint
35,' Lot: joint
377 MH 5
Grade and !,tructure good.
TV INSPECTION REPORT
SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
IC4s 620 Cottonwood Lane
0 DATE: 'Ir.vt•t::ber )X , 11i77 PAGE NO. 4 ._
o`
z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: ('i t•: cf
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: : me
4i�1 ON: ri• t of t.' :v • outh of river _
11� -•hFROM: TO:
LINE: SIZE: 15 Inches (dia.) 91 Ft, ( length) SANITARY
DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM
AGE: New X Old 17 Years
TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete - Asphalt
X Other ea::ement --
MANHOLE CONDITION: X GoodFair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream
Ft. Fr, Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS PFt. No.
( OO MF `
fir .t 50 feet quite dirty; probably from wAter back up from
1?" line from Rah,-
92 MH 7
Grade and st:-ucture appear good; line dirty '-'
SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT
cot 'C., DATE:
c 620 Cottonwood LaneNovember 161977 PAGE NO. 5
" Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same
ON: right of way south of river
FROM: TO:
LINE: SIZE: is Inches (dia.) _113 Ft. (length) X SANITARY
DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM
AGE: New x Old 17 Years
TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: y Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt
x Other easement
MANHOLE CONDITION: Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
-- g Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: g Upstream Downstream
Ft, Fr, Film Photo
M,H, REMARKS 1Ft. No.
00 MH 7
09 Small roots in joints
32 . Small roots
62 Offset joint 1" tap 6 •
113 MH 6
Grade and structure good
•
TV INSPECTION REPOR1
SOLIDIFICATION, INC,
y. °�� '�';i 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 17, 1977 PAGE NO. 6
Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: (*.try of Shlknnee
V. PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: ,,.Mlle
.A ON: right of way 5_nuth of river _
A FROM: TO:
LINE: SIZE: lc Inches (dia.) 188 Ft. ( length) X SANITARY L
DEPTH: Ft, PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM
AGE: New X Old 17 Years
TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite _ Other
CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete - Asphalt L
x Other easement
MANHOLE CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor L
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped _ Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream
Ft. Fr.1 Film Photo L
M.H. REMARKS 1Ft. No.
- 00 MH 6
83 Roots in joint
90 Wide joint OK
95 Broken bell grade OK 7
113 Roots in joint 8 —
0
125 Wide joint with roots
143 Wide joint with roots .r
188 MH 5
Grade and structure good except at; noted
SOLIDIFICATION, INC, T ` INSPECTION REPORT
c� •-e;-, •
620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 17, 1977 PACE NOS 7
2 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee
� PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same
1.� ON: right of way south of river
FROM: MH 8 TO: MH 9
LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 373 Ft. (length) X SANITARY
DEPTH: Ft, PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM
AGE: New X Old 17 Years
TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt
X Other -
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream
Ft, Fr, Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS Ft. No.
00 MH 8
55 Service R y
110-155 Low pipe 3-5" low
139 Camera under water
157 Service R debris at joint
163 Offset joint
204 Service R 9
273 Roots in joint 10
300 Service R
323 Offset joint 3/8-1/2" top
334 Low joint
373 MH 9
Grade marginal; structure good.
TV INSPECTION REPORT
SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
'C4, DATE• November 17. 1977 PAGE N0, 8 —
N c� 620 Cottonwood Lane •
Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: samei�,i
4 1 ON: right of way south of river —
FROM: TO:
LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 377 Ft. (length) X SANITARY ♦ _
DEPTH: Ft, PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM
AGE: New X Old 17 Years
TYPE: Clay __ PVC X Concrete —
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt —
X Other
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream
Ft, Fr, Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS Ft, No.
00 MH 9
123 Service R tap
242 Service R tap protruding running 11 —
277 Service R protruding running
287 Offset joint 1" top/bottom 12
295-315 Low pipe 1-3"
307 Low joint 3" low
377 MH 10
Grade marginal -- :structure good —
• i
— SOLIDIFICATION, INC, TV INSPECTION REPORT
. .0" ��'; 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 14. 1977 PAGE NO. 9
Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same
��•6,,� ON: right of way south of river
FROM: TO:
— LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) _116 Ft. ( length) X SANITARY
DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM
AGE: New X Old 17 Years
TYPE: Clay _ PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt
X Other — -
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream
Ft, Fr,1 Film Photo
M,H, REMARKS iFt. No.
00 MH 10
06 Service L
91 Small roots in joint
106-116 2-3" low
116 MH 11
Grade and structure good
• t
SOLIDIFICATION, INC, TV INSPECTION REPORT
`O'I
b` ,C',O
620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 14. 1977 PAGE NO. 10 —
Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same
,•6 ON: right of way south of river _
(! FROM: TO:
LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) _ 270 Ft, (length) X SANITARY
DEPTH: Ft, PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM
AGE: New X Old 17 Years
TYPE: Clay _ PVC X Concrete —
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt
X Other -
MANHOLE CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream
Ft, Fr, Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS Ft, No.
00 MH 12
47 Roots in joint
58 Roots in joint
91 Possibly protruding service L midway from joints 13
150 Badly offset joint upstream pipe about 1-2" drop 14
181 Offset joint 1/2-1" low ur. tream
262 Service 12:00
270 MH 11
Grade and structure marginal
SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT
y``O'� '`' 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 15, 1977 PAGE NO. 11
b
Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee
�. ' PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same
!it\ �'. ON: right of way south of river
FROM: TO:
LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 378 Ft. (length) X SANITARY
DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM
AGE: New X Old 17 Years
TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt
X Other easement
'- MANHOLE CONDITION: Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
— X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream
Ft. Fr. Film Photo
M.H. I REMARKS ,Ft. No.
00 MH 13
65-79 Low pipe 2-3" low
103 Offset joint 3/8-1/2" offset
105-116 2-3" low
178 Service entry L
258 Small roots in joint
303 Service entry 12:00
318 Roots in joint 15
330 Roots in joint
366 Light roots in joint
378MH12
Grade marginal structure good
1
•
TV INSPECTION REPORZ
SOLIDIFICATION, INC, November 15, 197712
o. O�� 'C4, 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: PAGE NO. —
" % Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee
�' PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: slime
,�;; ON: right of way south of river _
A FROM: TO:
LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia,) 133 Ft. (length) X SANITARY L
DEPTH: Ft, PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM
AGE: New X Old 17 Years
TYPE: Clay PVC --1--- Concrete L.
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt L
X Other easement -
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor L
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped - Other L
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream
Ft. Fr. Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS 1Ft. No.
00 MH 13
-L
31 Sm:ill roots
61 Offset joint 1/2" I
70-85 Low pipe 2-3" low
133 MH 14 L
L
Grade marginal -- structure good
L
L
• L
SOLIDIFICATION• , INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT
°�� ��'�, 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: November 15. 1977 PAGE NO. 13
" Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of ShAopee
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same
ON: right of way south of river
FROM: TO:
LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 241 Ft. (length) X SANITARY
DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM
AGE: New X Old 17 Years
TYPE: Clay PVC � Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: X Goud Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt
X Other easement
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream
Ft. Fr.� Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS Ft. No.
00 MH 14
25 Offset joint
37 Roots in joint
53-65 Low 2-3" low 1
85 Offset joint small roots 1
103 Roots in joint
130-140 Low pipe 1-2"
180-220 Low 3-4"
205 Offset joint 1/2"
241 MH 15
Grade marginal -- structure good
Roots caught in camera - could not take pictures because
of bright spot. MH 15 buried.
•
1
TV INSPECTION REPOR1,
SOLIDIFICATION, INC. November 15 1977 14
y. °�� �r'�o\ 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: PAGE N0. __Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee
�' PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same
ON: right of way ,south of river
,./.;: V. ..
FROM: TO:
LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 254 Ft. (length) X SANITARY L.
______
DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM
AGE: New X Old 17 Years J...TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other L
CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete - Asphalt L
X Other
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical L
X Undeveloped _ Other l
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X
L.
p Downstream
Ft. Fr. Film Photo L
M.H. REMARKS pFt. No.
00 MH 15 was buried _I
07 Roots in joint L
30, Roots in joint
44I Roots in Joint ''
. r L
56, Roots in joint
68 Heavy roots in joint
101 Service R
k
126 Roots in joint
242 Offset joint 1/2" _
254 MH 15A (new) _-
Grade and structure good.
.r
Roots caught in camera - could not take pictures
because of bright ::pot.
—, —
SOLIDIFICATION• , INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT
0' 620
�C'', 620 Cottonwood Lane
° DATE: November 15. 1977 PAGE NO. 15
1 Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: City of Shakopee
�'— PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same
ON: -fight of way south or river
FROM: TO:
LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 122 Ft. ( length) X SANITARY
DEPTH: Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft, STORM
AGE: New x Old 17 Years
TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt
Other pa-:ement
MANHOLE CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
y Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream
Ft. Fr, Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS 4Ft. No.
00 MH 15A
, 23 L.irde rocks in line
96-107 Low pipe 2-3" low
122 MH 16
•
Grade and structure good
Should have rocks removed
I
•
REPORT INDEX
Report Summary
Location Page
On Minnesota River, from MH 16 - 17 to MH 18 1-2
On Minnesota River, from MH 19 to MH 18 3
On Minnesota River, from MH 19 to MH 20 4
On Minnesota River, from MH 21 to MH 20 5
On Minnesota River, from MH 23 - 22 to MH 21 6-7
On Minnesota River, from MH 23 to MH 24 8
On Minnesota River, from MH 25 to MH 24 9
On Minnesota River, from MH 25 to MH 26 10
On Minnesota River, from MH 26 to MH 27 11-1?
On Minnesota River, from MH 27 to MH 28 13-14
On Minnesota River, from MH 30 - 29 to MH 28 15-16
On Minnesota River, from MH 30 to MH 31 17
On Minnesota River, from MH 31 to MH 32 18 _
On Minnesota River, from MH 33 to MH 32 19
On Minnesota River, from MH 33 to MH 34 20
On Minnesota River, from MH 35 to MH 34 21
On Minnesota River, from MH 35 to MH 36 22
On Minnesota River, from MH 37 to MH 36 23
Picture pages: '—
SOLIDIFICATION, INC,
TV INSPECTION REPORT
y. O' /c're 620 Cottonwood Lane
= Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: May "•7 - Jurtf ?
PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: 1977 PAGE NO.
City ..� I�:ikooee
AT ,,we
ON:
FROM: TO:
Ft. Fr. Film Photo
M,H. REMARKS Ft. No.
:CPO'T FuteLARY
Not much infiltration at pre'ent time, but in areas where
pipe i-: low, joint • would be opened up on bottom and even
changes in flow could cause a sewer charging action, and
in time w<: : :,and from out:;ide and in, thu.; causing .i
void around pipe, ciu .inQ them to ..ettle, and eventually
crinnle your main line into ,eriou . problem:.,
A rough ynor .i:; ;;outinue: , but : ee report for .Iet: it
MH 17 - 1F: ..hould be re-cleaned
- 19: •.hould he re-cle=ined
MH 19 :;nd 2 pipe rich direction should be raised
MH 71 and nine 5(1' up, tre.m : hould be rai: ed
Mh ' ' - MH 21: low pipe all the way & :;hould be raised
• MH '? :end / pine down •tre-m hould be raised
MH 71 - MII '4: cmewhat low, but liveable
_ It :appear that fir -t 75' downstream of MH ?5 is very dirty
with ,-o.ar:.e rock and gravel. If thi: were clean, MH 24-/5
would drain better and eve:-ything from MH /4 - MH ?6 would
drm in better. Could be re-televi ped after cleaning and
checked out,
MH ?5 - MH 27 iF1 dirty, but also appear:. that high fill bank
on ton of pipe c.+u:;ed grade problems from MH 26 - Sta. 80 to 230.
Should be raised,
CONTINUED
SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT
°1, , 620 Cottonwood Lane
" °s Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: May 27 - t„na ? 1977 PAGE NO.
PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: oiry nf . },,knp"
*°41147 AT: ,„,
FROM: TO:
Ft. Fr. Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS Ft. No.
RtTntm i m'ry ••rutinmPd
.;H 27 - '8: b„Id i pie 171-'3l'' and 1:o 105-381
should be r u i ed
MH 1E - /9! OK
MH ?9 - 3(1: O_:
MH 30 - 11:
MH 31 - 3'• UL_ but ,e-1 leak It .'t:;_ 16 --
MH 33 - '.': OK -
MH 3 - 34 : OK, but ,,e.t1 leek
NH 35 - 14: low Hire„ hut liveable
'5 - 15: OK, but . e:.1 lei;k in NH 35
.7 - 15: One b: d .not for g•rAde, but liveable _
SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT
°`°o, ,c',0 •
620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: H.;•, 17, 1477 PAGE NO. 1
Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: °1: 1I r,ee
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT:
.�� ON: Minne.ioti Fiver
FROM: MN 16 - 17 TO: MIT 16
LINE: SIZE: 12 Inches (dia.) 218 Ft. (length) X SANITARY
DEPTH: 7-E Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM
AGE: New X Old Years
TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: 7 Gravel Concrete Asphalt
Other — -
MANHOLE CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
Y _ Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream
Ft. Fr. Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS Ft. No.
tw 11H 16
ff•-et right id.± 1/;'"
15 :Ito in slrAc /4
57 ':oot.• in joint l ':^ ' & ?:N' 1
•5 :oot : in joint 7
•
75 Joint low 1" or .its. 81 high 3
54-1C•8 1" low
111 ^.00tz, in joint - like Picture r?
171,-14r Low nice 1-1 z" or MU hih
135 Light roots in joint
140 M11 17
Or MU 17
nO-15 1-1 i" of and in pile
35 service in pipe nt 2:C( 4
4 . Heavy root.. tor. hrlf pipe low le 5
TV INSPECTION REPORZ
SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
,o f
os'
620 Cottonwood Lane
" z Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: ti-!y ''7, 1 )77 PAGE NO.
PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: �•_ ;;�, ,�,e
AT. —.
ON: Einne -otn 'iyer
FROM: :11! 1 > - 17 TO: Alli 1;.'
Ft, Fr, Film Photo L
M.H. REMARKS Ft. No.
5 -'''-" w^te:- in nine
r,l . Pc ;ible cervi: e t 1:On or hole in nine full of root : 6
- loci
'35-3"
91 Heavy root entcrinQ, M1{ 7
9f; MH 18
35-91; l-?" of writer in line F. Mf{ 1F L
cee following re ,ort for ob• tcu:.tion & renson
low.
•
L
j
In g,enernl, thi'. section look; good except for roots .
L
. L
L
1
SOLIDIFICATION, INC. T r INSPECTION REPORT
Nom`°or 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: May 27_ 1977 PAGE NO. 3
= Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: ch.ikopee
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same
ON: Minnesota River •
FROM: MH 19 TO: 'kill
LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) __ 86 Ft. (length) SANITARY
DEPTH: 7-8 , Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM
AGE: New 1960 X Old Years
TYPE: Clay _ PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt
Other
MANHOLE CONDITION: Good Dirty Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream
Ft. Fr. Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS Ft, No.
00 MU 19 6" of water
00-15 Tapers from 6" of water to dry pipe at ::t:!. 15 8
44 Roots in joint E. 1-1)' of sand & gravel in pipe 9
66 2-2." of ;,and and gravel in pipe - hold.: water b:.cl: upr. trer.ai 10
77 3-3 " sand & gravel
82 Heavy root:: 10:0U & 2:0C
86 MH 18
Pipe grade and structure good, but ditty & needs
cleaning to drain - see next report for statu> on 00-15.
TV INSPECTION REPORT
SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
y`°�� �r', 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: May 27. 1977 PAGE NO. 4
Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: chaknpe_e
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: .:am+_
ON:
FROM: Minner.ot.' PivPr
Mu 19 TO: mH it)
LINE: SIZE: 1R Inches (dia.) __60 Ft. (length) SANITARY —
DEPTH: R_lA Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM
AGE: New 1960 X Old Years _
TYPE: Clay PVC Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt _
Other
•
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Dirty Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream
Ft. Fr. Film Photo _
M.H. REMARKS Ft. No.
00 MH 19 water down .tre:gut 10-11"
02-1? Taper:, from lu-11" low to 3" low at 12
12-17 Tapers from 3" low to dry pi 'e nc ta. 17 _
50 . Detergent and grea-.e on inner wall.; of pi7e 11
50 MH 20
Pipe looks good except dirty
* MH 19 hat; settled 8-10" and al.:o 2 pine each direction have
settled.
{
�� ,
SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT
'O c' c 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: M.,5, 27, 1977 PAGE NO• 5
= Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: _shakonee
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: -.:;me
• • 40' FROM:ON: Minae :^it.-i River TO
rlli U
LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 218 Ft. (length) X SANITARY
DEPTH: 8-18 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft, STORM
AGE: New 1960 X Old Years
TYPE: Clay PVC Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt
Other
MANHOLE CONDITION: Good _ Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream
Ft, Fr, Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS 1Ft. No.
•
00 MH 21 8-9" of water at MU
39 Light root:: in joint
00-50 Tanen: from ;,-9" of water it MH to dry ni ',e ir 5''•
78 Service L `f tin OK no flew
105-21' Low pipe up to .1" low at 15n & 165
125 1-1k" of water
135 1 ' low
140 2" low
150 21" low
165 214" low
170 C:ease & detergent on inner wall'
185 114-2" low
218 MH 20
Pipe ::tructuie OK, but low area - up to from 105-?] 5.
Real bad grade from 00-5n, up to 9-10" low including MH.
NH ..-.:t t„ bink.
SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT
`°if , 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: May 31. 1977 PAGE NO. o
Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Shikopee
- PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: saute
ON:
ON: Minne;ota River
FROM: MH 2'+ - 22 TO: efli 21
•
LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) _741 Ft. (length) X SANITARY —
DEPTH: 10-17 Ft. PIPE LENGTH g Ft. STORM
AGE: New X Old Years _
TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt _
Other
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Dirty Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream
Ft. Fr.
Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS MH 21 plugged 'Ft. No.
00 MH 23
25 2-21i" low
00-45 Low'
22 1-l'f" low
32-75 1-l " low
75-90 Low ?-^'!"
90 Low ?-2r
12
90-111 r,H at 110 4-5" low
103 5-6" low 13
111 MH 22 5-G" low
MH al•:o low
00 MH 22 5-6" low
07 Light root:. in joint 5-s" low 14 .-
if Light root:, in joint Like Picture 1'14
25 Light roots in joint 15
l
SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT
0 620 Cottonwood Lane
O
" Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: May 31, 1977 PAGE NO. 7
_ 444g,
PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: ch _kn e��AT: ame
ON: Minne .ct- Pivor
FROM: mi 21 _ 20 TO: NH 21
Ft, Fr, Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS Ft, No.
00-30 5-6" low
30-40 7-8" low
43 Service L tap 6 or 8" OK
49 8-9" low 16
53 9-10" low
50 Camera under water in 10" of water in 18" pipe
50-95 Camera under water 10" or more low
95-115 Picture, but 9" low
115-130 Low pipe 7-8"
130 MH 21 low 7-8."
Thi e tion, MH22-21 ap'.+etil . to hive .ettl:d from
5-10" or more li..ted,
h a . o :.ettled, -3 _ li ted
Fine ! tructure in both . ection.. i goo.i,
SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
DATE: 1'INSPECTION REPORT
c` . 620 Cottonwood Lane
y 1, 1977 PAGE N0. 8
)" ic
" = Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: ShAko',ee
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: :.brae
� ON: Minnerota River —
�' FROM: al '3 TO: l'JL 24
LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 38Ft. (length) SANITARY
DEPTH: 1?-14 Ft. PIPE LENGTH � Ft. STORM
AGE: New X Old Years
TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt —
Other -
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good _ Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream
Ft. Fr. Film Photo _
M.H. REMARKS MH 21 plugged Ft. No.
CC MR 23
25-41 3/4" dip in gr.ide OK
60-76 3/4" di: in gr :de OK _
120-138 3/4" din iu gr•ide C::
144-175 Low gr:,de 1-1 '
175-'40 Low grade 1A-2'
240-280 Low grade 2-21/2"
249 Low 2-211"
17
280-100 Low 21/2-3"
300-34C' 3-3.1/29 low —
340-380 'i-4" low
38+0 MH 24 3 -4" water •:t:undine in MR
Pipe -,t:u`ture very good. _
Pipe quite clean.
SOLIDIFICATION, INC. T V INSPECTION REPO R T
°�°1620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: May 11, 1977 PAGE NO. 9
= Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Shikopea
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: :;:ime
ON: Minne':ot River
FROM: MH 25 TO: Nit 4
LINE: SIZE: 18 Inches (dia.) 379 Ft. (length) X SANITARY
DEPTH: 6-9 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 6 Ft, STORM
AGE: New X Old Years
TYPE: Clay _ PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt
Other Park
•
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good dirty Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
Undeveloped Other Park
CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream
Ft, Fr, Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS MH 21 plugged Ft. No.
•
00 MH 25
00-150 High water ;t- nding in pipe 9-10"
188 High water t 'nding in pipe with flow up• tre::m plugged off 8-9" 18
19b-225 6-8" w:'t.2r all the
125-?7C 5-5" water c nding in pipe
270-315 4-5" water :-t.inding in pi"e
315-379 33-4" water :.tanding in pipe
355 Typical 18" pipe 4" water in pipe 19
379 MH 24
Grade in this section i. uniform, but either the entire
line is settled or heavy flow from 15" pipe entering MH?5
from the :south block!. it & holds water t::.ble high in
pipe half way b rk to NH 21.
s
TV INSPECTION REPORT
SOLIDIFICATION, INC,
N..`co' 'c',s 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: May 31, 1977 PAGE NO. lf)
Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Slv.kopee
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: - me
Vil ON: Minne:.ot..� River —
FROM: MN '5 TO: .)
LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) 39& Ft. (length) X SANITARY •—
DEPTH: 6-7 Ft, PIPE LENGTH � Ft. STORM
AGE: New X Old Years _
TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt
Other Par
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream
Ft, Fr, Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS �Ft. No.
Ot MH 25
07-CS 01" pi;,e low 11" leaving MH and :it f.ti. 9 we h. ve full picture
bac►c - about t• ' low
35-11( 5-7" flow
110-155 5-6" flow
155-300 5-51" flow
300-35(1 5-6" flow
360-390 4-5" flow
190 MH 26 -
Thi . section very uniform for grade, but flow in pipe
quite deep. ;'tructure very good. Pipe i . cle n,
It appe i .. that from c:mp ra action while --
rull.inw that the fi_. t 75 or 1C(' ft, could be very
dirty wLih ::oar::e material:. under flow, cau:.ing
•
t:able in ripe in thi : entire -!ren,
SOLIDIFICATION, INC, TV INSPECTION REPORT
c`°,� ,c').c 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: N-ly '1, 1977 PAGE N0, 11
" s Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: h d of e
1741117
/` PH: (612) 535-1065 AT:
- Aei� ON: Minn �t i River.
Awi FROM: MH 7i TO: epi 7
LINE: SIZE: ,71 Inches (dia.) _2,78 Ft. (length) X SANITARY
DEPTH: 8-9 Ft. PIPE LENGTH S Ft. STORM
AGE: New X Old Years
TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: Good X Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt
X Other Park
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream
Ft. Fr.
Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS 4Ft. No.
CO MH 76 NH plugged & is:.in • em•,ty
55-86 Start of dirty pine
80-107 T;-pzr:, from dry pine to li -11" lou
107-11 ' 10-11" los;
113-182 C .L:C:-1 under water it le.: t 11" low
187 Picture back 9-10" low
152-'2.30 Taper: bzz.::.k to 2" of water
230-960 of water, taper, to dry pine a:t 26u
260-276 Dry pipe to 4" low at 27.
276 Dirty & low pipe down 1-4" 20
— 276-340 L w & dirty 4"
368 Debri:; in pipe low 4" 21
343 Joint not home & pipe di_ty 22
Low t.iper.- irons low to dry pi')e at
378 MH 27
TV INSPECTION REPORT
SOLIDIFICATION, INC,
".0
620 Cottonwood Lane _
Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: May "11. 1977 PAGE NO, 1:i
PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR:
*AV AT
•.:1mP
ON: MinnP ^r PivP
FROM: M1j 16 TO: tIH -7
Ft, Fr, Film Photo 1 —
, M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. !
p4 •r'nr1`Y
11<7d ;,'r Rl`_"(' rnmr 1 '"
Ft,—1 -01r..r 4" —
Need.. rLe^niig
SOLIDIFICATION, INC, T V INSPECTION REPORT
o' 4;\
��''a 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: Jiro. ', 1')77 PAGE NO• 1 '
= Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Sh :kopec•
IVAIM
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT:
ON: Minne:;ot i River
NN FROM: MH "7 TO: t.:{ 28
LINE: SIZE: Inches (dia.) m1 Ft. (length)
DEPTH: 7_11 Ft, PIPE LENGTH g Ft. x STORM
AGE: New x Old Years
TYPE: Clay PVC Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: Good X Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete Asphalt
Other
MANHOLE CONDITION: ;; Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
x Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream
Ft, Fr,
Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS MH 27 r,lueged 4Ft. No.
00 Mir 27 MH dry & dr- ini.nr
60-92 Lou pipe 3/4-1" of water
115-170 Low 1-11:"
144 �e.rviee R .i cr 8" Oh:
155 Typical 2" ioint low 1-1k" & lirty ?3
170-187 Low 11/2" & taper.: to 7-e" low :t 187
187 7 8" low po. : ibly dirty ripe under the w:Irer dA)ri• & n-e. •e 24
on top
'06 Low pipe 7-8" :'t 187 & taper..- to lu" lc.w . Dirty on ton, 25
Thi. pipe cun: full during normal flow
212 Loot: in ioint & 8-9" water taner- from 11" lova it 2nr. hark to 26
8" low at 21Y
T:;per:: from 8-9" low at _l. b .ek tc 1" of w-:ter it :;c.1, 230
230-._7t. 1" of wi cc-r
277 Root.; in joint & '-:." of water
SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT
`°,r 'C'�, 620 Cottonwood Lane
Oy O
" z Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: June 7, 1977 PAGE NO. 14
-;,;-- PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: 711 ,.{;note
AT: we
ON: N.inne ot:: River
FROM: MH :'7 TO: rut " 8
Ft. Fr. Film Photo 1--
M.H. REMARKS Ft. No. 1
270-3C,5 2-3" low
305 ?-3" low & t.oer - to 6" low at 355
321 ervice R 6 or 8' ni^•e OK low S-6" 27
355-381 Continued 4-5" low to MH
3E1 MH 28 4" of water in MH
Pipe appe. r - quite :•le 'n •-ome rare . .e on inner
Bad grade noted in re^ort
SOLIDIFICATION, INC, TV INSPECTION REPORT
°'%OoI •620 Cottonwood Lane DATE1977 Jun: •>- 9 • PAGE NO. 15
" Z Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR:
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: .,me
.6 ON: 1-1inn�> of ' 4:iver
Npp FROM: MH 30 - 29 TO: MU
LINE: SIZE: -1 Inches (dia.) _17b Ft. (length) SANITARY
DEPTH: irt_jq Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM
AGE: New X Old Years
TYPE: Clay PVC
Cast Iron — x Concrete
Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel Concrete
Asphalt
Other -
MANHOLE CONDITION: Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential
Commerical
Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream Downstream
M.H, Film Photo
REMARKS pr? ^7' •-•1c -e1 Ft. Nc.
G: Iut 30
00-30 3/4-1" of w.ter
30-50 1-1;" of w::ter :.tanding
"* 59 Calcium build-up .,t 1.0 . E, f-•-t drip l:-1'• low 28
50-62; 1•Z-2" low :.t :'sta. 60 & t.•ner:. to dry nine :It 'i8 j,:.int :,t 68 1" high
68-10u Low 111-2" of water low point 't. • 05 - 1"
110-130 Low 1"
130-150 0i'
liib MH "9
Pipe c-.tructure good.
1-2" of water in bottom of pie on enri e line
Very good
00 Ilii 29 debris in MH huldinb water -2J high up- tre:im
to Sta. WO
65 . Servicedat r 'rd & nrotr:,di 4 pipe low l -2" $ 29
— f
TV INSPECTION REPORT
SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
00 620 Cottonwood Lane
y z Minneapolis, MN 55441 DATE: June 3, 1977 PAGE NO. 1'
PH: (612) 535-1065 FOR: 1�_ kooee
AT: Minn
ON: llinneot. <iver
FROM: Mi 30 - ?9 TO: `iti
Ft. Fr. Film Photo L
M.H. REMARKS Ft. No.
1C,0-150 Loco lk-?" L
156 Light root:. in joint & loci ?k" 30
150-li0 Low ,-?" L
16n-186 Low 1-4"
186-189 Low 11/2-4"
190 gni 28
Gr::de on thi section bounce, rround from 1-4" low
noted but no harp breAk : in grade and cuite
uniform.
Pioe tructu e very good,
.'cnewh t bre., y on inner w :11 .
SOLIDIFICATION, INC. T V INSPECTION REPORT
w,s°ir 'r'' •
o 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 2, 1977 PAGE NO. 17
= Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Shakopee
..'' PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: same
ON: :in
innesota River
FROM: MH 30 TO: MH 31
LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) 361 Ft. (length) X
DEPTH: — SANITARY
18-11 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft, STORM
AGE: New X Old Years
TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt
Other -
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION_ --_` Upstream X Downstream
Ft, Fr, Film Photo
M.H. REMARKS Ft. No.
00 MH 30 MH 30 plugged
MH 30 dry at start
05-55 Low.pipe tapers to 3 " deep at 38 and back to dry pipe at 55
* 117 Service at 1:00 flowing 31
* 166 Service at 12:00 - many fast streams of water flowing out 32
166 Soap suds and flow out of service 33
217 Service at 1:00 OK
291 Service it 1:00 OK
293 Service at 12:00 tapped & heavy flow Looks like Picture #32 & 33
305 Low pipe or dip in grade
340 Service at 2:00 tapped OK
361 MH 31
Debris in MH hold!. water back to 305 about 1'-3" deep
Pipe clean and grade very good - structure very good
o�� �� SOLIDIFICATION, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT_
'►, 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 2. 1977 PAGE NO. 18
=
Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Shrknpez
ag
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: ti ame
41*: ON: Minnesota River
FROM: MH 31 TO: MH 32
LINE: SIZE: ,)1 Inches (dia.) _ 355 Ft. (length) X SANITARY --
DEPTH: 11_8 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft, STORM
AGE: New X Old Years _
TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete _ Asphalt _
Other Brush
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream
IiiiimmmmakairenewT
Ft. Fr, Film Photo —
M.H. REMARKS 1Ft. No.
00 MH 31 MH 30 plugged
* 18 Heavy leak in joint 3:00 1-115 gal, per min. 34
34 Calcium build-up on joint has leaked not now _
51 Calcium build-up has leaked
171 Debris or cement in bottom of pipe holds 1-11" of water in
pipe back to Sta. 1UU
206 Service at 12:00 tapped OK dry
355 MH 32
Pipe clean line, grade, structure - very good -'
Leak at Sta. 18 should be sealed
•
SOLIDIFICATION, INC. T V INSPECTION REPORT
,01, 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 2_ 1977 PAGE NO. 19
Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: Makooee
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: sae
f•�����"__ ON: Minnesota River
FROM: MH 33 TO: MH 32
LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) _ 370 Ft. (length) X SANITARY
DEPTH: 8_9 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM
AGE: New X Old Years
TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: X Good Fair
— --- Poor
ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete
Asphalt
Other Woods
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair
Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
X
Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream
Ft, Fr.
M,H, Film Photo
REMARKS 1Ft. No.
00 MH 33 MH 30 plugged
00-20 Low pipe 13/4"
52 Service at 12:00 flowing OK
158 Service L 11:0CC dry OK
248 Service L tapped dry OK
37C MH 32
This section very good for line, grade, structure
•
•
a__
TV INSPECTION REPORT
SOLIDIFICATION, INC. _
Nyopt ic'>= 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 2. 1977 PAGE NO. 20
Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: nakopee
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: ::ame
ON:
FROM: Minnesota River
MH 33 TO: MH 34
LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) 296 Ft. (length) X SANITARY • —
DEPTH: 9-7 Ft. PIPE LENGTH Ft. STORM
AGE: New X Old Years _
TYPE: Clay _ PVC y Coucrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: x Gravel Concrete Asphalt _
Other woods
MANHOLE CONDITION: x Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
x Undeveloped Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream X Downstream
Ft, Fr, Film Photo
M,H, REMARKS 1Ft, No.
O(. MH 33 MH 30 plugged
06 Fast drip in Joint at 12:0C
02-48 Low pipe out of MH 1-14" _
296 MH 34
This section very good for line, grade, and structure
No problems
I _
•
oyo�, SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
% TV INSPECTION REPORT
0 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 1. 1977 PAGE NO 21
= Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: `lhakopee
� PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: ,:•me
5411°
ON: Minne,ot�i River
FROM: MH 15 TO:
_ MH 34
LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) 113 Ft. (length)
DEPTH: SANITARY
7_8 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM
AGE: New X Old Years
TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron i Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete Asphalt
Other wood:;
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential
X Undeveloped Other •
Commerical
CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream
Ft. Fr,
M,H, REMARKSFilm Photo
MH 34 plugged ,Ft. No.
00 MH 35
* 02 Leak at 5:30 position in MH at end of 21" pipe 1/2 gal, per min, '
34 Typical 21" pipe -.how:; normal flow line & low pipe 2-211" 35
_ 43 2J-3" low
51 Tapers to 4-5" low
58 Tapers to 5-6" low Note how much higher normal flow marks 36
are now
58-95 Tapers back to about 11/2" low manhole ahead
95 1-11" low 37
113 MH 34
Bad grade en this line: 58' is the low point and this i
• rect y un er a - cu vert t at •ra ns: a po o - • c .�:,
this birm - on top of sewer - lowest area 30-95
Pipe in clean and structure i:; good.
Leak in MH 35 should be sealed.
SOLZDIFICATIUN, INC. TV INSPECTION REPORT
`° c',
•
10
by �I i i —
620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 1977 • PAGE NO. ?2
Minneapolis, MN 55441 FOR: clok,p0n
PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: •-ime.
ON: —
.iii Minna�nt,i YiuPr
p FROM: MH '3% TO: 36
LINE: SIZE: :24Inches (dia.) _30/ Ft. (length) g SANITARY —
DEPTH: 7 A Ft. PIPE LENGTH A Ft. STORM
AGE: New x Old Years _
TYPE: Clay _ PVC . Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite _ Other
--
CONDITION: --X---CONDITION: _X__..- Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: Gravel _ Concrete Asphalt
- — Other
wood
MANHOLE CONDITION: _ Good Fair Poor —
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential Commerical
— Undeveloped - Other
CAMERA DIRECTION: Upstream Downstream
•Ft. Fr. Film Photo _
M.H. REMARKS
MB 'IL ?1„agari Ft. No.
(
O{L MN 15 MN bot*om clo,-e to A,-it 4 - —
sO-66i 3/4-1" of wtor
76 Cglriitm hitCIA-ITQ on joint _ 38 —
16f-7n4 Taperer to 1#" dppp nt ]RA, . hnrk to 't/4" a 2 15
1R6„ Low pnint 1-1ii" of water
205 Tanen; from 114" deer to '-2k" deal:. at StL 235 & continues
2-21" deep to Sta. 260 —
, 260 Taners from 2-215" dee at 260 back to about 114" at Sta 275 —
275 MH OK
302 MH 36 —
Pipe .tructure irz Qood
Grade varies 2-2)4" but uniform
Pipe is clean
• I
- i
SOLIDIFICATION, INC, TV INSPECTION REPORT
.:-. 5.;77F:0;7F''� 620 Cottonwood Lane DATE: June 3, 1977 PACE NO, 73
y Z Minneapolis , MN 55441 FOR: ShnknoPe
. iiiir..&,: PH: (612) 535-1065 AT: %;:Me
y ON: Mtrine_;Qta B iv_er
FROM: MH 37 TO: MN 35
LINE: SIZE: 21 Inches (dia.) 292 Ft. ( length)
X SANITARY
DEPTH:
20-8 Ft. PIPE LENGTH 8 Ft. STORM
AGE: New X Old Years
TYPE: Clay PVC X Concrete
Cast Iron Ductile Truss
Transite Other
CONDITION: Good Fair Poor
ROAD SURFACE: X Gravel Concrete
_ Asphalt
Other wood: -
MANHOLE CONDITION: X Good Fair
Poor
TYPE OF AREA: Industrial Residential
X Undeveloped Other Commerical
CAMERA DIRECTION: X Upstream Downstream
Ft. Fr.
M,H, Film Photo
REMARKS MH 34 plugged 'Ft No.
00 MH 37 at sewer plant 2-3" of water standing in this pipe
because of heavy flow entering MH 37 from the east, ?-3" at
J manhole and tapers off to a dry pipe at Sta. 175
00-175 Grade uniform
209 Normal flow mark half pipe pipe greasy on i1rgide
joint corroded typical —'�
209-217Tapers to 4" low at 217
217-225 � Taper:; from 4" low beck to normal
292 MH 36
This section looks very _good for line and structure
Sharp grade dip at 209-225
Pipe is greasy
' ,
APPENDIX A3
TV INSPECTION LOGS OF RIVER TRUNK SEWER, 1992
46„ '`,,z SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
7233 Winnetka Avenue North / Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 / (612) 535-1065
April 15, 1992
Mr. Dave Simons
-- Short Elliot Hendrickson
3535 Vadnais Center Drive
St. Paul, Minnesota 55110
SUBJECT: TELEVISION INSPECTION REPORT WORK ORDER #5218
Dear Mr. Simons,
Enclosed are the field findings of our television inspection
report. Should you have any questions regarding this inspection
please, feel free to contact our office.
Also enclosed is a copy of our invoice, the original invoice has
been sent to the accounts payable department.
We look forward to serving your future needs.
Thank You,
Robert Ratz
Sales Manager
RR/kb
enclosures
` Specialists In Underpinning and Ground Water Control
CLOSED CIRCUIT
TELEVISION INSPECTION REPORT
FOR
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON
IN
SHAKOPEE,, MINNESOTA
WORK ORDER NUMBER 5213
Shakopee, Minnesota
April 8, 1992
Solidification, Inc.
7233 Winnetka Avenue Nort
Minneapolis, Minnesota 5542
(612) 535-1065
y\OO f /Cqr'`
I', °y
„
SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION
PROCEDURE
The television inspection is conducted by pulling a water proof television
camera, at a uniform rate, through the sewer line. The line condition, as
viewed by the television camera, is transmitted to a television screen
(monitor) . The television technician observes and records the following
pertinent data:
• Broken, cracked or missing pipe
. Alignment, line and grade
. Defective joints
•
• Infiltration or inflow
. Root intrusions
. Service connections (and locations)
• Protruding taps
• Other pertinent factors that would affect proper
functioning of the line.
RECORDS
Written records are kept of pertinent data. In addition, polaroid pictures
(from the television screen) are taken of defects, etc. , and included in the
report. The report locates all taps and services, indicating the distance
from the manhole. The service is further identified as entering from the
right or left, using the clock face as a means of identification. Depending
upon the analysis, pertinent recommendations are included.
Oy O\f fC O
Iy Z �
DEFINITIONS
Broken A section of line or service loose
or missing from the pipe.
Camera Under Water Indicates a flowing or standing
liquid in excess of one-half pipe.
Circular crack A crack around the circumference of
the pipe.
Clock A position relating to the numerals
on the face of a clock.
Collapsing Indicates that a section of pipe
is broken and in danger of falling
in.
Combined sewer A sewer intended to serve as a sani-
tary and a storm sewer.
Dead End The beginning of a section of line
on the upstream side.
Downstream exfiltration The leakage or flow of discharge
being carried by sewers out into
the ground through leaks in pipes,
joints, manholes, or other sewer •—
system structures ( the reverse of
infiltration) .
Drip A slow intermittent flow of extran-
eous water entering the pipe through
a joint, service, or structural
deficiency.
Fractured pipe A pattern of irregular cracks in the
pipe.
Hairline crack A minor crack, not necessarily a
structural failure.
Infiltration Water entering a sewer system and
service connections from the ground,
through means such as, but not
limited to, defective pipes, pipe
joints, connections, or manhole
walls. Infiltration does not include _
and is distinguished from inflow.
Jho O\
sS -
1,1,,.
Inflow Water discharged into a sewer
system and sewer connections from
such sources as, but not limited
to, roof leaders, cellar, yard and
area drains, foundation drains,
cooling water discharges, drains
from springs and swampy areas, man-
hole covers, cross connections from
storm sewers and combined sewers,
catch basins, storm waters, surface
run-off, street wash waters, or
drainage. Inflow does not include
and is distinguished from infil-
- tration.
Infiltration/Inflow The total quantity of water from
both infiltration and inflow with-
out distinguishing the source.
Inside drop A sewer line which enters the man-
hole wall at an elevation above
the invert and discharges (drops)
wastewater directly into the man-
- hole some variable distance above
the manhole bottom.
Leak A measureable, steady flow of
extraneous water entering the pipe
through a joint, service or other
pipe structural deficiency.
Longitudinal crack A crack parallel to the direction
of flow.
Manhole (Standard) An opening in a sewer provided for
the purpose of permitting access
to the sewer system for inspections
and manitenance.
Misalignment Departure from true grade line of
pipe.
Offset joint Indicates a misalignment of the
joint.
Open crack or open joint Any crack or joint where separa-
tion is evident.
�O�f
�O
h
Outside drop A sewer line that comes to a manhole at
an elevation higher than the invert; a
vertical riser is connected to the line
and is brought into the manhole at the
invert with a 90° elbow.
Piece missing A piece broken out of the wall of
the pipe.
Radial crack A circular crack of less than
360°.
Sanitary sewer A sewer intended to carry only
sanitary and industrial waste-
waters from residences, commercial
buildings, industrial plants,
and institutions.
Service A manufactured wye or tap con-
nected to the main line.
Service leaking Infiltration into the sewer around
a service connection.
Service running A measureable, steady flow of ex-
traneous water entering the pipe
from the service connection.
Spiral crack A crack progressing longitudinally
in a corkscrew pattern.
Storm sewer A sewer intended to carry only
stormwater, surface run-off, street
wash waters, and drainage.
Tap protruding A service that protrudes into the
main sewer line.
Upstream The higher end of a gravity flow
sewer line.
k .:F SOLIDIF
»y'°'' '`'r-= ICATION, INC.
1444a zr
7233 Winnetka Avenue North / Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 / (612) 535-1065
ROOT GROWTH RATING SYSTEM
FOR ROOTS IN MUNICIPAL SEWER SYSTEMS
-
e / t�._
t
1 2 3
i . es . i : Ili r„.
_ . .I . - -
I. l .;r+
� . h'
t
4 5 6
: :. •"._,",P,, -r
frilliglifillig: T ,,itA .. , -.:__. i A, .fil, ,
4: ' , • .:.
7 8 9
0 to 9 System for rating root growth.
A rating of 1 indicates 10% of pipe capacity occupied by root growth. Ratings con-
- tinue through this numerical scale to 9, which indicates 907. occupancy by roots.
No rating of 10 was used, as this would be 1007. occupancy and a complete root stoppage.
Specialists In Underpinning and Ground Water Control
TV INSPECTION REPORT -
:,p '�+r,Z SOLIDIFICATION, INC. DATE: 3-23-92 PAGE NO. 1 —,7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOHendrickson, Inc.
R: Short Elliott
MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota _
(612) 535 1 0s5 ON: Easement along Minnesota River
wil" � FROM: MH #2 TO: MH #3 —
R.Q. #5213
LINE: DIAMETER: 15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: _
PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 395 Ft. GRAVEL —
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x —
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE DUCTILE x MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD x
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR —
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #2 at West end of the project where line
goes under Highway 169 00
38 Roots in joint #8 1
50 Roots in joint #8 —
56 Roots in joint #9 - tryed to pull to next manhole
to clean camera, got stuck at 114' , backed out and —
put camera in at next manhole, backed to 247 ' got
—
stuck again, continued downstream
261 Roots in joint #6 2
315 Roots in joint #3
369 Roots in joint #5 —
387 Roots in joint #1
395 Manhole #3 360
TV INSPECTION REPORT
y,%o" ,Z SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 3_23_92 2
DATE: PAGE NO.
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
(612) 535-1065
41107 ON: Easement along Minnesota River
FROM: MH #3 TO: MH #4
LINE: DIAMETER: 15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 8 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 372 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
-- PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD x
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR
TRUSS _ INDUSTRIAL POOR
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #3 360
24 Roots in joint #3
96 Roots in joint #8 3
148 Roots in joint #9
162 Roots in joint #5
305 Roots in joint #1
372 Manhole #4 777
TV INSPECTION REPORT
y�� +, SOLIDIFICATION, INC. DATE: 3-23-92 PAGE NO. 3
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota40 —
i& (612) 535-1065 ON: Easement along Minnesota River
FROM: MH #4 TO: MH #5
LINE: DIAMETER: _15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: —
PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X
DEPTH: 13 _ Ft. CONCRETE _ UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 379 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT X
SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR - -
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE X ._
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD X
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR —
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #4 777
204 Roots in joint #1
291 Service Right tap ok
299 Roots in joint #5 —
379 Manhole #5 1118
•
TV INSPECTION REPORT
•, SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
° ° DATE: 4-1-92 PAGE NO. 4
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 Shakopee,
—
vo (612) 535-1065AT: Minnesota
ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #8 TO: MH #7
LINE: DIAMETER: 15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM
DEPTH: 12 _ Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM X
LINE LENGTH: 96 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT X
SANITARY X _ UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD x
OTHER: FAIR
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE X
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #8 at end of Clay Street
Televising with Rahr Company - flow off 1116
96 Manhole #7 1238
TV INSPECTION REPORT -
°�°'` '��•o SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
DATE: 4-1-92 PAGE NO. 5
21 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
11:1 MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: _Shakopee, Minnesota _
i�®�t���� (612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #7 TO:
'�'l�, '` MH #6
LINE: DIAMETER: 15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: —
PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM
DEPTH: 13 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM X
LINE LENGTH: 115 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT x
SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD X
OTHER: FAIR
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE X —
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE _ COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR —
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS --
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #7 1238 —
115 Manhole #6 1336
TV INSPECTION REPORT
° '��•o SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-1-92 6
' PAGE NO.
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
, MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
(612) 535.1065
ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #6
TO: MH #5
LINE: DIAMETER: 15 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM
DEPTH: 13 Ft. CONCRETE _ UPSTREAM x
LINE LENGTH: 189 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD x
OTHER: FAIR
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
— PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #6 1336
189 Manhole #5 - behind Dairy Queen 1520
TV INSPECTION REPORT -
yrs �. SOLIDIFICATION, INC. DATE: 4-1-92 PAGE NO. 6
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota —
4464 (612) 535-1065
ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #8 TO: MH #9
LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: _
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 12 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 375 Ft. GRAVEL —
EASEMENT _ x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x --
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS _ INDUSTRIAL POOR —
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #8 at Clay Street - 15" line plugged 1520 —
at manhole #8
02-100 Very dirty 2 - 3 inches of debris on the bottom
159 Service Right tap - protruding 4 inches 4 —
208 Service Right tap ok
302 Service Right tap ok
375 Manhole #9 at end of Pierce Street 1816
Entire line is dirty
TV INSPECTION REPORT
..°)" 'c4•, SOUDIFICATION, INC.
° DATE: 4-1-92 PAGE NO. 7
y Z 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428
(612) 535-1065 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
� �►' ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #9
TO: MH #10
LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT _ DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 12 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 379 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM _ CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR
_ OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #9 at end of Pierce Street 1816
02-110 Dirty 1 - 2 inches of debris on bottom
126 Service Right tap ok
245 Service Right tap - protruding 3 - 4 inches 5
275 Service Right tap - protruding 4 inches 6
379 Manhole #10 2075
Line is quite dirty through out
TV INSPECTION REPORT -
SOLIDIFICATION INC. 4-1-92 8
0 Z ' DATE: PAGE NO.
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
�� � (612) 535-1065
ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #10 TO: MH #11 —
LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 10 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 116 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD x
OTHER: FAIR —
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x _.
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE _ COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR —
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW __ SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #10 2075 --
05 Service 12:00 tap ok
116 Manhole #11 2158
TV INSPECTION REPORT
y,,0 1C4•Z SOUDIFlCATION, INC. 4-1-92 9
DATE: PAGE NO.
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
�^ MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428
� � AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
(612) 535.1065
r: ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #11 TO: MH #12
LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 271 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x
TYPE: CAST IRON _ POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x— VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING mss_ OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #11 - line is plugged 2158
06 Service 12:00 tap ok
88 Roots in joint #2
120 Offset joint 12 inches offset 7
179 Service Right tap ok
271 Manhole #12 2370
TV INSPECTION REPORT -
•
,)'. -'4, SOLIDIFICATION INC. 4-1-92 10
0 i ' DATE: PAGE NO. —
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
*140' MINNEAPOLIS.065 MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
ON: _ —
( Minnesota River - Easement
481114.
FROM: MH #12 TO: MH #13
LINE: DIAMETER: 18 _ In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: —
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X
DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 380 Ft. GRAVEL
—
EASEMENT _ X
SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x —
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x —
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR —
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING OTHER: TYPE: VHS _.
NEW — SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #12 2370
75 Service 12:00 tap ok
107 Roots in joint #3
121 Roots in joint #1 —
211 Roots in joint #1
306 Roots in joint #2
327 Service 12:00 tap ok
331 Roots in joint #4
360 Roots in joint #5 ,r,
372 Roots in joint #2
380 Manhole #13 2600 —
TV INSPECTION REPORT
(:) SOUDIFICATION, INC.
DATE: 4-1-92 PAGE NO. 11
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
(612) 535-1065
WO" ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #13
TO: MH #14
LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X
DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 135 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT X
SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x
TYPE: CAST IRON _ POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD x
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #13 - where Scott Street would come out 2600
46 Looks like roots around a tap -_ not a joint
67 Roots in joint #4 •
102 Roots in joint #3
135 Manhole #14 2706
TV INSPECTION REPORT -
%°'V 6. SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-2-92 12
0- • DATE: PAGE NO.
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson,. Inc.—
11:1MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
� � (612) 535-1065
ON: Minnesota River - Easement
/AJ
FROM: MH #14 TO: MH #15 —
LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: —
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT X DOWNSTREAM X
DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 243 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT
SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR X —
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE X
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR X
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR —
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS NEW SPEED: _ EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #14 - line is plugged here 2706 —
37q Roots in joint #1
48 Large rock in line (4-5 inches)
158 Roots in joint #1 —
165 Roots in joint #2
180-207 Low pipe 3 - 32 inches low —
207 Offset joint 12 inches offset
230 Roots in joint #2
243 Manhole #15 - where Atwood Street would be 2848
TV INSPECTION REPORT
c;. '`�• SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
yy o DATE: 4-2-92 PAGE NO. 13
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MIN(NEAPOLIS,
612) 535-1065
MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #15 TO: MH #16
LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
— DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 380 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT x
— SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS • INDUSTRIAL POOR
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: - TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #15 where Atwood Street would be - large 2848
roots in manhole - growing down the pipe a couple feet
06 Roots in joint #2
18 Roots in joint #1
30 Roots in joint #4
42 Roots in joint #1
54 Roots in joint #2
66 Roots in joint #5 _
116-126 Low pipe 12 - 2 inches low
101 Service Right ok
126 Roots in joint #1
150 Roots in joint #3
156 Roots in joint #1
162 Roots in joint #2
— 168 Roots in joint #1
TV INSPECTION REPORT
SOLIDIFICATION INC
y� fo ' DATE: 4-2-92 PAGE NO. 13A
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc..
FOR:
inorttp., MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
(612) 535-1065 Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #15 TO: MH #16
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
198 Roots in joint #4
255 Manhole - new manhole added for service
355 Large rock in pipe (4-5 inch)
380 Manhole #16 - where Fuller Street would come out 3094 L
L
1
L
1
L
l
1
TV INSPECTION REPORT
SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
o DATE: 4-2-92 PAGE NO 14
y Z 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH Short Elliott Hendrickson, inc.
�� FOR:
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 Shakopee,
� � (612) 535-1065 AT: Minnesota
t".
ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #16TO: MH #17
__
LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 140 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR
_ OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #16 - where Fuller Street would be 3094
67 Roots in joint #1
109 Roots in joint #2
140 Manhole #17 3184
TV INSPECTION REPORT
,, , SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
4-2-92 PAGE NO. 15
DATE:
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.—
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota _
(612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #20 TO: MH #19 —
•
LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: —
PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM
DEPTH: 18 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM X
LINE LENGTH: 60 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT X
SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR —
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR X
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE _ COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR —
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #20 under 169 bridge on west side 3184
43-60 Low pipe up to 10 inches llow
52 Looks like and offset joint 8
60 Manhole #19 3251
TV INSPECTION REPORT
•
..
'c4 SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
o DATE: 4-2-92 PAGE NO. 16
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
��� (612) 535-1065
ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #19 TO: MH #18
LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM
DEPTH: 6 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM x
LINE LENGTH: 82 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT x
-- SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR x
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
-- MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #19 - manhole is low 9 - 10 inches 3251
02-12 Low pipe up to 6 inches low
82 Manhole #18 3301
Looks like 2 - 3 inches of debris on bottom of pipe
TV INSPECTION REPORT -
'C4 SOLIDIFICATION INC.
0 o DATE: 4-2-92 PAGE NO. 17 —
Z 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
IV * MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
4ii& (612) 535-1065 Minnesota River - Easement
J ON:
FROM: MH #18 TO: MH #17 —
LINE: DIAMETER: 8 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: —
PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT _ DOWNSTREAM
DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM x
LINE LENGTH: 98 Ft. GRAVEL —
EASEMENT X
SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR X —
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE X —
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE _ COMMERCIAL FAIR _ X
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR —
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS —
NEW SPEED: EP
—
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
—
00 Manhole #18 3301
06 Roots in joint #5
15 Large chunk of roots on top of the pipe - does no
appear to be at a joint - may be a tap here —
62 Service Left tap ok
98 Manhole #17 3362 —
Line is quite dirty through out
TV INSPECTION REPORT
'C4 SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
y- o DATE: 4-6-92 PAGE NO. 18
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTHFOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
11:13'
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
(612) 535-1065
ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #20 TO: MH #21
LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 21 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 218 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR
_ TYPE: CAST IRON POOR x
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
-- PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD x
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #20 - this manhole is plugged 3362
02-80 Low pipe 2 - 3 inches standing water
140 Service Right tap ok
166-194 Low pipe up to 11 inches
— 194-218 Camera under water
218 Manhole #21 - stands with 2 - 3 inches of solids
manhole is very low 3445
TV INSPECTION REPORT
,, -
y0" 'c4.o SOLIDIFICATION INC. DATE:
4-6-92 _ PAGE NO. 19
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
*41 MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428
AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
(6121 535-1065
ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #21 TO: MH #22
•
LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: —
PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 12 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 130 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR —
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR x
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR x —
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS —
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #21 - manhole is low with debris standing in —
manhole 3445
02-108 Camera is under water
108-130 Low pipe 8 inches low _
130 Manhole #22 3512
TV INSPECTION REPORT.
SOUDIFICATION, INC. 20
4-6-92
0 i DATE: PAGE NO.
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428
_
*a*, AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
(612) 535-1065
ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #22 TO: MH #23
LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 10 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 110 Ft. GRAVEL _
EASEMENT X
SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR x
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC _ TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR x
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: FP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #22 - manhole is low 8 - 9 inches low 3512
02-30 Low pipe 9 - 10 inches low
30-98 Low pipe 4 - 6 inches low
110 Manhole #23 3570
TV INSPECTION REPORT -
, SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-6-92 21
y i DATE: PAGE NO.
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 Shakopee, Minnesota(6121 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #23 TO: MH #24 —
LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: —
PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 14 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 378 Ft. GRAVEL _
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x -'
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR —
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW _ SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #23 at end of Lewis Street - manhole plugged 357C —
05-200 Low pipe 2 - 3 inches of standing water
200-378 Low pipe 4 - 5 inches of standing water
378 Manhole #24 at the end of Summerville Street 3720 —
TV INSPECTION REPORT
�•, SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
° (:) DATE: 4-6-92 PAGE NO. 22
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
(612) 535-1065
ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #24
TO: MH #25
LINE: DIAMETER: 18 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 6 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X
DEPTH: 9 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 379 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT X
SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR X
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE X
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS _ INDUSTRIAL POOR
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED __X __ VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #24 at end of Summerville Street 3720
02-120 _ Low pipe 4 - 5 inches standing water
120-310 Low pipe 6 - 10 inches low
310-366 Camera under water
379 Manhole #25 at the end of Spencer Street 3879
Some of the water could be held up from the 15"
line coming in from the South.
TV INSPECTION REPORT
1c4. SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-6-92 23
0 i DATE: PAGE NO.
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
(612) 535 1065 ON: Minnesota River — Easement
FROM: mm #95 TO: MH #26
LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X
DEPTH: 7 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 388 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT X
SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION _ GOOD
OTHER: FAIR X "'
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE _ COMMERCIAL FAIR X
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR
OTHER RESIDENTIAL x
UNDEVELOPED — VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From I Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #25 at the end of Spencer Street - this 3879
manhole leaks heavy when river is up
02-100 Dirty - rocks & debris
81 Joint leaking 2:00 _
388 Manhole #26 at end of Fillmore Street 4065
Flow coming in manhole #25 from the 15" line to the
south is only 2 - 3 inch in the 15" pipe
TV INSPECTION REPORT
‘olf �• SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-6-92 24
DATE: PAGE NO.
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
tV, MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT:
Shakopee, Minnesota
— � (612) 535-1065
�► ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #26 TO: MH #27
LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 8 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 372 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR x
CLAY
CONCRETE �—
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: RP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #26 at end of Fillmore Street 4065
70-200 Low pipe camera under water
203 Joint leaking
278-308 Low pipe camera under water
308-370 Low pipe 3 - 4 inches low
372 Manhole #27 at end of Main Street 4206
Line seems to be quite dirty.
TV INSPECTION REPORT —
1car 'SOLIDIFICATION INC. 4-6-92 25
0 i DATE: PAGE NO.
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
'p41,- MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
(612) 535-1065
ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #27 TO: MU #28
LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: _
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 8 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 377 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR —
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR x
CLAY
CONCRETE _x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE _ COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR —
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS _
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #27 at end of Main Street - manhole leaking 4206
57 Joint leaking approximately 1 g.p.m.
139 Service Right tap ok
142-165 Low pipe 3 - 4 inches low —
165-217 Camera under water
271 Roots in joint #1
274-302 Low pipe 3 - 4 inches low
302-356 Camera under water
356-377 Low pipe 4 - 5 inches low _
377 Manhole #28 at end of Market Street 4353
Line may be dirty, water standing the whole way. .
TV INSPECTION REPORT
. SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
0 o DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 26
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
WA, Ati, MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
(612) 535-1065
ONN:: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #28 TO: MH #29
LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 18 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 189 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #28 at end of Market Street - plugged at 4353
this manhole - manhole has small leaks
02-45 8 - 10 inches of standing water & debris
15 Large pile of debris
36 Roots in joint #3
45-189 Pipe very dirty 3 - 5 inches of debris
126 Service 12:00 tap - protruding about 2 inches
157 Joint leaking approximately 1 g.p.m.
158 Service Right tap ok
189 Manhole #29 4450
— Line is very dirty
_ TV INSPECTION REPORT -
>°`' 1C4. SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
y 7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota _
(612) 535-1065 Minnesota River - Easement
�► J ON: —
FROM: MH #29 TO: MH #30
LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: _
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 16 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 188 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x —
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x ._
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #30 4450
02-188 Very dirty 2 - 3 inches of debris
188 Manhole #30 at Minnesota Street 4517
TV INSPECTION REPORT
�., SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 28
y DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO.
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
VA"' (612) 535-1065
ON: Minnesota River - Easement
J
FROM: MH #30 TO: MH #31
LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM X
DEPTH: 10 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 359 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT X
SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR X
_ TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE X
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR X
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL _ POOR
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #30 at Minnesota Street 4517
02-359 Dirty 2 - 21/2 inches of debris
46 Joint dripping
78 Joint dripping
115 Service Right tap ok
163 Service 12:00 tap ok
182 Roots in joint #1 - joint is leaking
215 Service Right tap ok
289 Service Right tap ok
292 Service Right tap ok
337 Service Right tap ok
359 Manhole #31 at end of Dakota Street 4650
Line is quite dirty through out
TV INSPECTION REPORT —
'c4, SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
yy i DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 29 —
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
(612) 535-1065 -
� ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #31 TO: MH #32
LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: —
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 3 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 364 Ft. GRAVEL _
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x —
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x —
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE _ COMMERCIAL FAIR ?
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS —
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #31 at end of Dakota Street 4650
Manhole is buried - can not find
• 02 Very dirty 2 - 22 inches of debris
09 Joint leak approximately 5 g.p.m. 9 —
17 Joint leaking heavy approximately 4 g.p.m. 10
142 Service 12:00 tap ok —
153 Joint dripping
203 Service Right tap ok
241 Roots at joint #2 joint is leaking approximately 1 g.p.m. —
273 Joint leaking approximately lg.p.m.
321 Joint leaking approximately 2 g.p.m. —
364 Manhole #32 4799
Line is quite dirty through out —
TV INSPECTION REPORT
‘QI r
C4 SOLIDIFICATION INC
y� o DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 30
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTHShort Elliott Hendrickson,. Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 FOR:
(612) 535-1065 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
► ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #32TO: MH #33
LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 9 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 360 Ft. GRAVEL _
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x
TYPE: CAST IRON _ POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
— PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR
— OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #32 at end of Prairie Street - MH plugged 4799
02-368 Dirty 2 - 21/2 inches of debris
31 Joint dripping
55 Joint dripping
63 Service Right tap ok
68 Service Right tap ok
121 Service Right tap ok
145 Joint leaking approximately 2 g.,p.m. 11
194 Leak through barrel approximately 1/2 g.p.m.
200 Joint leaking approximately 1 g.p.m.
211 Service Right tap ok
318 Service 12:00 tap ok
360 Joint leaking approximately 1/2 g.p.m.
368 Manhole #33 4970
Line is quite dirty throught out
TV INSPECTION REPORT -
SOLIDIFICATION INC
0 '1 DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 31
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc:—
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 AT: Shakopee, Minnesota
(612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #33 TO: MH #34 —
LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT _ DOWNSTREAM X
DEPTH: 9 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 295 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT X
SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION __ GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x —
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE X _
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #33 4970 —
02-295 Dirty 2 - 3 inches of debris
05 Joint dripping
76 Joint dripping —
125 Service 12:00 tap ok
140 Roots in joint #4 - leaking
228 Joint dripping
295 Manhole #34 5111
Line is quite dirty through out
TV INSPECTION REPORT
•
SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
yy o DATE: 4-8-92 _ PAGE NO. 32
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTHShort Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428 FOR:
— f�� (612) 535-1065 AT: Shakopee,. Minnesota
9�� ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: MH #34 TO: MH #35
LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM x
DEPTH: 10 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM
LINE LENGTH: 112 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR x
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
- MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #34 5111
02-112 Dirty 3 - 4 inches of debris
22 Joint leaking approximately 1/2 g.p.m.
112 Manhole #35 manhole is leaking 5178
Line may be 4 - 5 inches low between 10 ' & 90'
hard to tell because of dirt
TV INSPECTION REPORT —
,��'' 'c4. SOLIDIFICATION INC.
y i DATE: 4-8-92 PAGE NO. 33 _
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson" Inc.
`( MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428
�� � (612) 535-1065 AT: Shakopee. Minnesota
A/J _ J ON: Minnesota River - Easement —
FROM: MH t37 TO: MH #36
LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION: —
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM
DEPTH: 23 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM x
LINE LENGTH: 286 Ft. GRAVEL _
EASEMENT x
SANITARY x UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR x —
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE x _
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD x
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR —
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED x VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING x OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #37 at lift station - plugged at MH #35 5178
157 Joint leaking - dripping
188-199 3 good size rocks
205 Offset joint approximately 2 inches —
205-240 Low pipe 3 - 4 inches low - also dirty
286 Manhole #36 5270
Line is dirty most of the way
TV INSPECTION REPORT
'��•, SOLIDIFICATION, INC. 4-8-92 34
y o DATE: PAGENO.
7233 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTHFOR: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
- MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55428
AT: Shakopee, Minnesota(612) 535-1065 ON: Minnesota River - Easement
FROM: Mil #36 TO: _ MH #35
LINE: DIAMETER: 21 In. ROAD SURFACE: CAMERA DIRECTION:
PIPE LENGTH: 8 Ft. ASPHALT DOWNSTREAM
DEPTH: 10 Ft. CONCRETE UPSTREAM X
LINE LENGTH: 300 Ft. GRAVEL
EASEMENT X
SANITARY X UNDER LINE CONDITION:
STORM CONSTRUCTION GOOD
OTHER: FAIR X
TYPE: CAST IRON POOR
CLAY
CONCRETE X
DUCTILE MANHOLE CONDITION:
PVC TYPE OF AREA: GOOD
TRANSITE COMMERCIAL FAIR
TRUSS INDUSTRIAL POOR
_ OTHER RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED X VIDEOTAPE INFO:
AGE: EXISTING X OTHER: TYPE: VHS
NEW SPEED: EP
Ft. From Video Photo
MH REMARKS Ft. No.
00 Manhole #36 5270
40-300 Very dirty 3 - 4 inches of debris
265 Large rock in the pipe
300 Manhole #35 5400
Line is quite dirty through out
.•. - -
. i".":: :.r .E.-::.....7..........:"... -- . -: -_____L.7.-......,..,....._.-....,t.=.
'-..=-..=---1-_,
- yT
_7
_
� ` .:
: I• li_ i
,_ rte. -0<
. X.....;.-%.: ,
_ _ 1 '
•
Y .1 _ _ .9
co
_ � .r--47." i -
:::.-1-= r
- _{ _
y
r.
I
- - - - -
f
-
C:
- OD
f-
•
•
•
w ♦ i.
•
• em ------_----.--.:- ._::: _..- 7... ---
_ :. x
......i Cr i 1 4 ." i . _ .=_._......_ ,.. ,. ....
. ,,_
:1
�
o
-
_ a: .:...-N,., :: ---- ,............,•-----:1"-":"7s:r7.'"'.'
Y,. 3
•
`n
t N
•
—
zr
�_. y-
•
3
•
•
a....441411. • f
- 1
O j
1..1 i
— E
-�. ; i
•
rt
i
I j , poen
— := i v
-0CT)C
1 <v2
�` . oo
_ .
a1
•
Aliiii1W11111111111111111ra '_"" '�'�"�_ �ert' .
APPENDIX A4
FLUOROMETRIC STUDY OF I/I IN RIVER TRUNK SEWER,1992
INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY
SANITARY SEWER INTERCEPTOR
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
SEC DONOHUE PROJECT NO. M2365.00
APRIL, 1992
PREPARED FOR: SEH, INC.
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA
PREPARED BY: SEC DONOHUE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1 .0 INTRODUCTION 1
— 2.0 PROJECT SCOPE 2
3.0 PROCEDURES 4
4.0 DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS 6
5.0 RESULTS 8
6.0 SUMMARY 9
List of Tables
Table 1 - Section #1 Flow Rate Data
Table 2 - Section #2 Flow Rate Data
Table 3 - Section #3 Flow Rate Data
Table 4 - Flow Monitoring Results
List of Figures
Figure 1 - Sanitary Sewer Interceptor Monitoring Locations
Figure 2 - Fluorescent Dye Flow Rate Measurement
Figure 3 - Section #1 Flow Rate Results
Figure 4 - Section #2 Flow Rate Results
Figure 5 - Section #3 Flow Rate Results
1 .0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents results of flow monitoring performed on a section of
sanitary sewer interceptor located along the South bank of the Minnesota
River in Shakopee,. Minnesota. The interceptor section under study is
shown in Figure 1 . The purpose of this study is to determine rates of
inflow/infiltration along the interceptor.
The flow monitoring work presented in this report involved the use of
fluoresent dye injection, sampling, and analysis to determine flow rates
at several points along the interceptor. The flow monitoring was
performed during low flow conditions in the early morning of March 22,
1992.
The organization of this report is presented below:
Section Description
2 Scope
3 Procedures
4 Data presentation and analysis
5 Results
6 Summary
This work was completed according to our proposal dated March 10, 1992.
1
2.0 PROJECT SCOPE
This section presents the scope of dye injection, sampling, and analysis
used to determine flow rates along the portion of the Shakopee
interceptor shown in Figure 1 . The flow rate results are used to
determine the magnatude of inflow/infiltration. For the purpose of this
work, manhole locations are designated by numbers , decreasing from the
lift station manhole (MH #37) . Figure 1 shows the locations of all
— manholes used in the flow monitoring work.
2. 1 PRELIMINARY INSPECTION
A preliminary inspection of the interceptor was performed on March
_ 13, 1992 to determine the accessibility of manhole locations and to
finalize the project scope. Manhole locations were sighted with
the assistance of Mr. Ray Ruske of the city of Shakopee.
The results of the inspection are summarized below:
— • Surcharged flow conditions were observed in Manhole #2 due to
large discharges from Rahr Malting over 1 ,000 feet downstream.
• The flow monitoring work must be performed during a period of
minimum discharge from Rahr Malting.
• Manholes #9, #10 and #11 could not be located due to high
water conditions and a lack of marking posts.
• Assistance from city staff would be helpful in locating and
opening manholes during the flow monitoring work.
2.2 PROJECT SCOPE
The scope of the flow monitoring work was determined based on the
inspection results and the desire to include •as much of the
interceptor length as possible. The monitoring work was
coordinated with Rahr Malting to limit the malting flow to two
intermittant processes . As a result, the interceptor under study
— was segmented into three sections.
2
Each section was chosen to allow upstream and downstream flow rate
measurement without major inputs between monitoring points . Thus ,
any increase in flow could be attributed to inflow/infiltration.
The three interceptor sections monitored in this study are listed
below. The interceptor section from MH#8 to MH#12 was excluded
from the study due to inputs from Rahr Malting and unaccessable
manhole locations.
Pipe
Upstream Downstream Diameter Distance
Section Location Location (Inches) (Feet)
1 MH #3 MH #8 15 1149
2 MH #12 MH #25 18 2681
3 MH #25 MH #37 21 3999
3
3.0 PROCEDURES
The determination of flow rates by a fluorescent dye analysis is shown
schematically in Figure 2. A dye solution of known concentration (ci ) is
injected at a constant rate (Qi ) upstream of the monitoring locations .
Flow rates are determined at each monitoring point by analyzing
wastewater samples for dye concentration (Cs) and calculating flow rates
via the equation (Qi ) (Ci ) = (Qs) (Cs) .
Rhodamine WT fluorescent dye is used as the tracing compound since it is
non—toxic, nonreactive, and is easily measured at low concentrations .
Dye concentration is measured using a Turner Designs, Model 10
fluorometer.
Background wastewater samples are collected upstream of dye injection
points for preparation of standards used to calibrate the fluorometer.
Use of background wastewater in standards preparation compensates for
minor losses in fluorescence which may occur through contact with the
wastestream.
3. 1 DYE INJECTION AND WASTEWATER SAMPLING
_ For this project, dye injection and background sampling was
performed at two locations (see Figure 1 ) . Manhole #2 was used as
the dye injection point for Sections #1 and #2. Due to the
relatively large flow input at MH #25, a second dye injection
system was installed in the manhole located at the intersection of
169 and Spencer Avenue.
Each dye injection location was equipped with a carboy of dye
solution, a positive displacement injection pump, and an automatic
sampler. Background wastewater samples were collected upstream of
dye injection throughout the period of dye injection by an ISCO
automatic sampler. The dye solution concentration and pump flow
rate were determined based on an estimate of wastewater flow to
yield stream dye concentrations within the sensitivity range of the
fluorometer.
4
Wastewater samples were collected at upstream and downstream
locations within each of the three interceptor sections . At each
location samples were collected using peristaltic pumps sampling
upstream of any flow inputs . The intent of the sampling was to
allow determination of flow rates over the same relative period at
both upstream and downstream locations.
Sampling was initiated at MH #3 at 2:50 AM. Samples were collected
at 30 second intervals until 3:35 AM at which time a slug of
concentrated dye was added. Sampling at downstream interceptor
monitoring locations was initiated based on estimated dye travel
times and continued until the dye slug was observed. Samples were
collected every 30 seconds; however, gaps in sampling did occur due
to pumping difficulties and extended sampling periods.
3.2 FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS AND FLOW RATE CALCULATION
Each wastewater sample collected from an interceptor monitoring
point was analyzed for dye concentration. A flow rate was then
calculated for each sample based on the measured dye concentrations
and the rate of dye injection.
Fluorescence measurement was performed and converted to dye
concentration using project specific standards. Standards were
prepared by diluting samples of the injected dye with the collected
background samples. A second set of standards were prepared using
deionized water for dilution to determine the decrease in
fluorescence caused by constituents of the wastewater. Comparison
of the deionized water and background standards found that the two
standards agreed within 96%, thus a significant reduction in
fluorescence did not occur.
5
4.0 DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
This section presents the flow rate data, field observations, and the
basis for comparing upstream and downstream flows. This information is
presented separately for each of the three interceptor sections .
4. 1 SECTION #1
For Section #1 , flow rates were determined and compared at
monitoring locations MH #3 and MH #8. The flow rate data for each
location are presented on Table 1 . The respective flow rates from
each location were compared based on the observed dye slug travel
time, 17 minutes. Flow rates are compared over a 45 minute period
and are shown on Figure 3.
4.2 SECTION #2
Flow rates for Section #2 were determined and compared at
monitoring locations MH #12 and the upstream side of MH #25. Flow
rate data for each location are presented on Table 2. Flow rates
were compared based on the observed dye slug travel time of 61
minutes. As shown on Figure 4, high flows were observed at both
locations over short periods due to inputs from Rahr Malting. Due
to the resulting flow pattern, flow rates could only be compared
over a 17 minute period between peaks .
4.3 SECTION #3
For Section #3, flow rates were determined upstream by adding the
two flow inputs to MH #25. Significant infiltration was observed
_ in MH #25 through several holes on the West side of the manhole
just above the crown of the upstream pipe. Downstream flow rates
were monitored at MH #37. As shown on Figure 1 , there is a
potential for minor flow inputs between these locations at MH #28
and MH #35. However, MH #28 was inspected during sampling at MH
#37 and no flow was observed. Also, it is likely that no flow was
added at MH #35 due to the small service area and its location
within an inactive portion of the city.
6
Flow rate data for the upstream and downstream monitoring locations
are presented in Table 3. Flow rates are shown in Figure 5. Flow
rates were compared over a period of 41 minutes based on the
observed dye slug travel time and a match of flow patterns . A
travel time of 55 minutes was used.
7
5.0 RESULTS
Table 4 presents the flow monitoring results for each interceptor
section. Results are presented in terms of inflow/infiltration (I/I)
rate and average flow velocity. I/I rates are presented in units of
gallons per day per inch diameter per mile of pipe. As shown, the
measured I/I range from 1500 to 3608 (GPD/In/Mi ) . These rates are
excessive considering that many municipal codes limit the acceptable
infiltration rate to 500 (GPD/In/Mi ) . However, it should be noted that
the infiltration rates presented were measured during high water
conditions . Also, much of the interceptor is surcharged under normal
operations of Rahr Malting.
The average flow velocity measured ranged from 0.73 to 1 .21 feet per
second. These values are low and indicate that an accumulation of solids
will occur. Several inches of accumulated solids were observed within
the interceptor at MH #2 and MH #28. These were the only interceptor
manholes entered.
8
6.0 SUMMARY
The following statements summarize the results of this I/I study.
• Surcharged flow conditions were observed within MH #2 under normal
operation of Rahr Malting approximately 1 ,000 feet upstream of the
Rahr Malting discharge input.
• Excessive I/I rates were measured in each of the three interceptor
sections with the highest I/I measured in Section #2. The I/I
ranged from 1500 to 3608 (GPD/In/Mi ) .
• Travel time measurements found that average velocities were low
within each section, especially in Section #2. Several inches of
_ accumulated solids were observed within each of the two manholes
entered.
9
- TABLE 1
SECTION #1 FLOW RATE DATA
SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY
_ SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
IiMANHOL3 OLE#8 l
ANALYZED MARE# CH 25.1992 11 ANALYZED MARCH 26.1992
ELAPSED 11ML- 'I 1ME 01- t•LOG RA I b II SAMPLE I IME 01- 11 FLOW M)1 E I
(MINUTES) I SAMPLE II ( J` 7�y
0 02:50:00 AM 73.4 03:01:00 AM
74.0 03:07:30 AM 75.7
- 0.5 02:50:30 AM
1 02:51:00 AM 74.0 03:08:00 AM 76.3
30 AM 77.7
75.2 03:08:
1.5 02:51:30 AM '
2 02:52:00 AM 74.6 03:09:00 AM 77.9
2.5 02:52:30 AM 74.6 03:09:30 AM 78.1
3 02:53:00 AM 76.5 03:10:00 AM 77.9
• 3.5 02:53:30 AM 76.5 03:10:30 AM 77.9
4 02:54:00 AM 77.2 03:11:00 AM 77.9
4.5 02:54:30 AM 77.2 03:11:30 AM 80.1
5 02:55:00 AM 77.8 03:12:00 AM 80.5
5.5 02:55:30 AM 77.8 03:12:30 AM 80.8
6 02:56:00 AM 78.5 03:13:00 AM 82.3
6.5 02:56:30 AM 78.6 03:13:30 AM 81.5
7 02:57:00 AM 79.2 03:14:00 AM 82.1
7.5 02:57:30 AM 79.9 03:14:30 AM 82.4
8 02:58:00 AM 79.9 03:15:00 AM 81.4
8.5 02:58:30 AM 80.6 03:15:30 AM 83.1
9 02:59:00 AM 82.0 03:16:00 AM 83.7
9.5 02:59:30 AM 81.6 03:16:30 AM 83.8
10 03:00:00 AM 81.3 03:17:00 AM 83.7
10.5 03:00:30 AM 82.0 03:17:30 AM 83.2
..- 11 03:01:00 AM 82.8 03:18:00 AM 83.7
11.5 03:01:30 AM 83.2 03:18:30 AM 83.7
12 03:02:00 AM 84.3 03:19:00 AM 84.0
12.5 03:02:30 AM 83.5 03:19:30 AM 83.8
13 03:03:00 AM 82.8 03:20:00 AM 83.8
13.5 03:03:30 AM 82.5 03:20:30 AM 84.2
14 03:04:00 AM 83.1 03:21:00 AM 83.8
14.5 03:04:30 AM 83.1 03:21:30 AM 83.8
- 15 03:05:00 AM 80.6 03:22:00 AM 83.8
15.5 03:05:30 AM 81.3 03:22:30 AM 83.8
16 03:06:00 AM 79.9 03:23:00 AM 83.8
16.5 03:06:30 AM 80.6 03:23:30 AM 83.8
17 03:07:00 AM 80.6 03:24:00 AM 83.8
17.5 03:07:30 AM 81.9 03:24:30 AM 86.4
18 03:08:00 AM 80.6 03:25:00 AM 86.3
18.5 03:08:30 AM 82.0 03:25:30 AM 87.5
19 03:09:00 AM 83.2 03:26:00 AM 87.1
- 19.5 03.09:30 AM 82.3 03:26:30 AM 87.1
20 03:10:00 AM 82.8 03:27:00 AM 87.5
20.5 03:10:30 AM 83.5 03:27:30 AM 88.9
21 03:11:00 AM 83.1
03:23:00 AM 89.2
21.5 03:11:30 AM 85.1 03:28:30 AM 90.3
22 03:12:00 AM 86.0 •
03:29:00 AM `7
22.5 03:12:30 AM 36.2 03:29:30 AM 11.1
- TABLE 1 (CONTINUED)
SECTION #1 FLOW RATE DATA
SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
MANHOLE#3 MANHOLE#8
- II ANALYZED MARCH 25.1992 II ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992
I ELAPSED(MINUTES)1L I I IME OF SAMPLE I 1-LOW( P)1E I SAMPLE TIME 01. I t L(GPM)1E
23 03:13:00 AM 83.5 03:30:00 AM 90.7
23.5 03:13:30 AM 84.3 03:30:30 AM 90.7
24 03:14:00 AM 85.7 03:31:00 AM 90.9
24.5 03:14:30 AM 84.6 03:31:30 AM 84.0
25 03:15:00 AM 86.0
_ 25.5 03:15:30 AM 84.3 12:00:30 AM 90.7
6 03:16:00 AM 84.3 12:01:00 AM
26.5 03:16:30 AM 85.1 12:01:30 AM 88.9
27 03:17:00 AM 86.0 12:02:00 AM 89.8
- 27.5 03:17:30 AM 86.0 12:02:30 AM 90.7
28 03:18:00 AM 86.0 12:03:00 AM 90.7
28.5 03:18:30 AM 85.9 12:03:30 AM 90.7
29 03:19:00 AM 85.7 12:04:00 AM 90.7
29.5 03:19:30 AM 85.7 12:04:30 AM 91.1
-
30 03:20:00 AM 85.7 12:05:00 AM 91.1
30.5 03:20:30 AM 85.9 12:05:30 AM 90.7
31 03:21:00 AM 87.5 12:06:00 AM 90.9
31.5 03:21:30 AM 86.2 12:06:30 AM 90.7
- 32 03:22:00 AM 85.6 12:07:00 AM 88.7
32.$ 03:22:30 AM 84.0 12:07:30 AM 89.6
33 03:23:00 AM 85.1 12:08:00 AM 88.9
33.5 03:23:30 AM 85.1 12:08:30 AM 89.22
34 03:24:00 AM 83.2 12:09:00 AM 90.7
34.5 03:24:30 AM 82.5 12:09:30 AM 88.9
35 03:25:00 AM 83.5 12:10:00 AM 87.5
35.5 03:25:30 AM 84.3 12:10:30 AM 87.1
- 36 03:26:00 AM 86.2 12:11:00 AM 87.1
36.5 03:26:30 AM 85.6 12:11:30 AM 88.9
37 03:27:00 AM 85.6 12:12:00 AM 87.5
37.5 03:27:30 AM 85.1 12:12:30 AM 88.5
38 03:28:00 AM 82.8 12:13:00 AM 88.9
-
38.5 03:28:30 AM
83.5 12:13:30 AM 88.9
39 03:29:00 AM 82.8 12:14:00 AM 87.1
39.5 03:29:30 AM 82.0 12:14:30 AM 87.1
40 03:30:00 AM 81.7 12:15:00 AM 85.9
-
40.5 03:30:30 AM 81.6 12:15:30 AM 85.4
41 03:31:00 AM 81.3 12:16:00 AM 86.8
41.5 03:31:30 AM 81.0 12:16:30 AM 85.3
42 03:32:00 AM 82.5 12:17:00 AM 83.8
- 42.5 03:32:30 AM 84.3 12:17:30 AM 83.8
43 03:33:00 AM 82.9 12:18:00 AM 85.4
43.5 03:33:30 AM 82.8 12:18:30 AM 85.3
44 03:34:00 AM 83.5 12:19:00 AM 85.4
44.5 03:34:30 AM '82.8 12:19:30 AM 85.8 .
AVERAGE I 2:50-3:35 1 82.3 1 3:07-3:51 1 85.7
TABLE 2
SECTION #2 FLOW RATE DATA
SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
MANIIOLb#12 MANHOLE#2.7 UPS1 REAM
ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992
bLAI'SED1!Mb DIME OF 1-LOW RAIL TIME OF PLOW RA 1 E
- (MINUTES) SAMPLE (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM)
12 03:19:00 AM 178.6 04:20:00 AM 119.0
12.5 03:19:30 AM 166.7 04:20:30 AM 135.8
13 03:20:00 AM 153.2 04:21:00 AM 155.0
- 13.5 03:20:30 AM 153.2 04:21:30 AM 177.0
14 03:21:00 AM 148.1 04:22:00 AM 208.1
14.5 03:21:30 AM 139.0 04:22:30 AM 249.7
15 03:22:00 AM 143.4 04:23:00 AM 298.0
- 15.5 03:22:30 AM 132.9 04:23:30 AM 347.4
16 03:23:00 AM 119.5 04:24:00 AM 394.9
•
16.5 03:23:30 AM 114.3 04:24:30 AM 440.1
17 03:24:00 AM 112.1 04:25:00 AM 457.5
_ 17.5 03:24:30 AM 106.3 04:25:30 AM • 462.1
18 03:25:00 AM 103.8 04:26:00 AM 453.0
18.5 03:25:30 AM 101.5 04:26:30 AM 435.9
19 03:26:00 AM 99.3 04:27:00 AM 398.3
19.5 03:26:30 AM 99.3 04:27:30 AM 358.2
-
20 03:27:00 AM 97.1 04:28:00 AM 323.1
20.5 03:27:30 AM 95.1 04:28:30 AM 298.0
21 03:28:00 AM 91.2 04:29:00 AM 265.5
21.5 03:28:30 AM 89.4 04:29:30 AM 236.9
- 22 03:29:00 AM 86.0 04:30:00 AM 213.8
22.5 03:29:30 AM 84.4 04:30:30 AM 196.5
23 03:30:00 AM 82.9 04:31:00 AM 175.0
23.5 03:30:30 AM 82.9 04:31:30 AM 164.4
-- 24 03:31:00 AM 82.9 04:32:00 AM 153.4
24.5 03:31:30 AM 84.4 04:32:30 AM 140.8
25 03:32:00 AM 86.0 04:33:00 AM 131.6
25.5 04:33:30 AM 123.8
- 26 04:34:00 AM 117.5
26.5 04:34:30 AM 111.8
27 04:35:00 AM 106.2
27.5 04:35:30 AM 104.2
- 28 04:36:00 AM 100.6
28.5 04:36:30 AM 96.6
29 04:37:00 AM 94.6
29.5 04:37:30 AM 93.7
30 04:38:00 AM 92.8
-
30.5 04:38:30 AM 95.5
31 04:39:00 AM 100.8
31.5 04:39:30 AM 106.8
32 03:39:00 AM 117.3 04:40:00 AM 119.8
- 32.5 03:39:30 AM 173.8 04:40:30 AM 108.6
33 03:40:00 AM 604.9 04:41:00 AM 210.2
33.5 03:40:30 AM 158.5 04:41:30 AM 244.0
34 03:41:00 AM 135.3 04:42:00 AM 295.0
- 34.5 03:41:30 AM 130.9 04:42:30 AM 299.4• •
35 03:42:00 AM 123.8 04:43:00 AM 327.7
35.5 03:42:30 AM 123.8 04:43:30 AM 286.9
• • 36 03:43:00 AM . 123.8 04:44:00 AM 251.1 •
- 36.5 03:43:30 AM 108.8 04:44:30 AM 224.2
• 37 03:44:00 AM 103.8 04:45:00 AM 203.5 .
37.5 03:44:30 AM 103.8 04:45:30 AM 207.1
38 03:45:00 AM 102.6 04:46:00 AM 172.3
• - 38.5 03:45:30 AM 101.5 . 04:46:30 AM . 157.6 .
TABLE 2 (CONTINUED)
SECTION #2 FLOW RATE DATA
SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
• MANHOLE#12 MANHOLE#25 UPS I REAM
ANALYZED MARCH 26.1992 ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992
ELAPSED 11ME TIME OF I-LOW RA 1 E 11ME 01- 1-LOW RA"I E
- (MINUTES) SAMPLE (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM)
39 03:46:00 AM 101.5 04:47:00 AM 147.6
39.5 03:46:30 AM 95.1 04:47:30 AM 138.7
40 03:47:00 AM 95.1 04:48:00 AM 134.6
40.5 03:47:30 AM 93.1 04:48:30 AM 125.5
41 03:48:00 AM 95.1 04:49:00 AM 122.2
41.5 03:48:30 AM 95.1 04:49:30 AM 117.5
42 03:49:00 AM 91.? 04:50:00 AM 113.2
42.5 03:49:30 AM 91.2 04:50:30 AM 111.8
- 43 03:50:00 AM 91.2 04:51:00 AM 111.8
43.5 03:50:30 AM 91.2
44 03:51:00 AM 91.2 04:52:00 AM 106.4
44.5 03:51:30 AM 93.1
45 03:52:00 AM 91.1 04:53:00 AM 106.4
45.5 03:52:30 AM 91.2
46 03:53:00 AM 90.3 04:54:00 AM 105.4
46.5 03:53:30 AM 91.2
47 03:54:00 AM 93.1 04:55:00 AM 104.2
47.5 03:54:30 AM 91.2
48 03:55:00 AM 93.1 04:56:00 AM 106.2
48.5 03:55:30 AM 91.?
- 49 03:56:00 AM 89.4 04:57:00 AM 106.9
49.5 03:56:30 AM 89.4
50 03:57:00 AM 89.4 04:58:00 AM 114.6
50.5 03:57:30 AM 91.2
- 51 03:58:00 AM 91.2 04:59:00 AM 109.2
51.5 03:58:30 AM 89.8
52 03:59:00 AM 91.2 05:00:00 AM 111.8
52.5 03:59:30 AM 91.2
._ 53 04:00:00 AM 89.8 05:01.00 AM 111.8
53.5 04:00:30 AM 91.2
54 04:01:00 AM 93.1 05:02:00 AM 123.8
54.5 04:01:30 AM 93.1
_ 55 04:02:00 AM 91.2 05:03:00 AM 123.8
55.5 04:02:30 AM 91.2
56 04:03:00 AM 91.? 05:04:00 AM 1/7.?
56.5 0.1:03:30 AM 93.3
57 04:04:00 AM 95.1 05:05:00 AM 130.8
57.5 04:04:30 AM 95.1
58 04:05:00 AM 97.1 05:06:00 AM 130.1
58.5 04:05:30 AM 95.1
59 04:06:00 AM 93.1 05:07:00 AM 123.8
'- 59.5 04:06:30 AM 91.2
60 04:07:00 AM 90.3 05:08:00 AM 153.4
60.5 04:07:30 AM 90.9
61 04:08:00 AM 90.9 05:09:00 AM 198.2
�- 61.5 04:08:30 AM 91.0.
62 04:09:00 AM 117.3 05:10:00 AM 69.7
62.5 04:09:30 AM 220.5
63 04:10:00 AM 477.0 05:11:00 AM 64.8
63.5 04:10:30 AM 604.9
64 04:11:00 AM 477.0
64.5 04:11:30AM 192.3
65 • 04:12:00 AM 63.1
• AVERAGE 1 . 3:49-4:06 I 91.81 4:50-5:07 114.7 1
TABLE 3
SECTION #3 FLOW RATE DATA
- SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
MANHOLE#2,UPS"!REAM MANHOLE#25 SPENCER SEC i ION#3 MANHOLE#37
ELAPSED ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 UPSTREAM ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992
TIME TIME OF FLOW RATE TIME OF FLOW RATE FLOW RATE TIME OF FLOW RATE
- (MINUTES) SAMPLE (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM) (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM)
0 04:08:00 AM 106.2 04:08:00 AM 164.4 270.5
0.5 04:08:30 AM _ 10L9 04:08:30 AM 164.4 266.3
1 04:09:00 AM 100.8 04:09:00 AM 160.3 261.1
_ 1.5 04:09:30 AM 97.8 04:09:30 AM 159.7 257.5
2 04:10:00 AM 97.2 04:10:00 AM 159.7 256.9
2.5 04:10:30 AM 96.6 04:10:30 AM 159.7 256.3
3 04:11:00 AM 96.0 04:11:00 AM 158.2 254.2
3.5 04:11:30 AM 94.6 04:11:30 AM 158.2 252.8
4 04:12:00 AM 94.1 ' 04:12:00 AM 158.2 252.3
4.5 04:12:30 AM 93.9 04:12:30 AM 156.7 250.6
5 04:13:00 AM 93.9 04:13:00 AM 156.7 250.6
5.5 04:13:30 AM 93.7 04:13:30 AM 156.7 250.4
6 04:14:00 AM 93.3 04:14:00 AM 153.9 247.2
6.5 04:14:30 AM 92.7 04:14:30 AM 152.5 245.2
7 04:15:00 AM 91.8 04:15:00 AM 152.5 244.3 05:10:00 AM 320.8
7.5 04:15:30 AM 104.5 04:15:30 AM 153.9 258.4 05:10:30 AM 316.8
- 8 04:16:00 AM 90.9 04:16:00 AM 151.1 242.0 05:11:00 AM 316.8
8.5 04:16:30 AM 90.9 04:16:30 AM 151.1 242.0 05:11:30 AM 316.8
9 04:17:00 AM 90.9 04:17:00 AM 149.8 240.7 05:12:00 AM 309.0
9.5 04:17:30 AM 91.8 04:17:30 AM 148.7 240.5 05:12:30 AM 309.0
- 10 04:18:00 AM 93.3 04:18:00 AM 148.5 241.8 05:13:00 AM 301.6
10.5 04:18:30 AM 96.6 04:18:30 AM 151.1 247.7 05:13:30 AM 302.4
11 04:19:00 AM 101.5 04:19:00 AM 153.9 255.4 05:14:00 AM 302.4
11.5 04:19:30 AM 107.2 04:19:30 AM 153.9 261.0 05:14:30 AM 303.8
_ 12 04:20:00 AM 119.0 04:20:00 AM ' 153.3 272.3 05:15:00 AM 309.0
12.5 04:20:30 AM 135.8 04:20:30 AM 153.6 289.4 05:15:30 AM 312.9
13 04:21:00 AM 155.0 04:21:00 AM 153.6 308.6 05:16:00 AM 330.9
13.5 04:21:30 AM 177.0 04:21:30 AM 153.9 330.8 05:16:30 AM 316.8
_ 14 04:22:00 AM 208.1 04:22:00 AM 153.9 361.9 05:17:00 AM 334.5
14.5 04:22:30 AM 249.7 04:22:30 AM 153.9 403.6 05:17:30 AM 347.4
15 04:23:00 AM 298.0 04:23:00 AM 152.5 450.5 05:18:00 AM 362.4
15.5 04:23:30 AM 347.4 04:23:30 AM 152.5 499.9 05:18:30 AM 373.1
16 04:24:00 AM 394.9 04:24:00 AM 151.1 546.0 05:19:00 AM 391.6
-
16.5 04:24:30 AM 440.1 04:24:30 AM 152.5 592.6 05:19:30 AM 409.5
17 04:25:00 AM 457.5 04:25:00 AM 152.5 610.0 05:20:00 AM 437.9
17.5 04:25:30 AM 462.1 04:25:30 AM 153.9 616.0 05:20:30 AM 453.7
18 04:26:00 AM 453.0 04:26:00 AM 153.9 606.9 05:21:00 AM 455.3
- 18.5 04:26:30 AM 435.9 04:26:30 AM 153.9 589.8 05:21:30 AM 470.7
19 04:27:00 AM 398.3 04:27:00 AM 151.1 549.4 05:22:00 AM 488.9
19.5 04:27:30 AM 358.2 04:27:30 AM 151.1 509.3 05:22:30 AM 479.6
20 04:28:00 AM 323.1 04:28:00 AM 149.8 472.9 05:23:00 AM 479.6
- 20.5 04:28:30 AM 298.0 04:28:30 AM 149.8 447.8 05:23:30 AM 457.0
21 04:29:00 AM 265.5 04:29:00 AM 149.0 414.5 05:24:00 AM 455.3
21.5 04:29:30 AM 236.9 04:29:30 AM 149.8 386.7 05:24:30 AM 450.5 •
22 04::30:00 AM 213.8 " 04:30:00 AM . 148.5 362.3 05:25:00 AM 437.9
22.5 04:30:30 AM 196.5 04:30:30 AM 146.9 343.5 • 05:25:30 AM . 423.2
23 04:31:00 AM 175.0 04:31:00 AM 148.7 323.7 • 05:26:00 AM 400.4.
23.5 04:31:30 AM 164.4 04:31:30 AM 149.8 314.2 • 0526:30 AM • 384.5
• 24 04:32:00 AM 153.4 04:32:00 AM 151.1 304.6 05:27:00 AM 374.2 •
_ 24.5 04:32:30 AM 140.8 04:32:30 AM 151.1 291.9 05:27:30 AM 375.3
25 04:33:00 AM 131.6 04:33:00 AM 149.5 281.1 05:28:00 AM 369.8
25.5 04:33:30 AM 1218 04:33:30 AM 151.1 274.9 05:28:30 AM 3522
26 04:34:00 AM 117.5 04:34:00 AM 149.8 267.3 05:29:00 AM 342.6
26.5 04:34:30 AM 111.8 04:34:30 AM_ 151.7 263.5 05:29:30 AM 334.5
27 04:35:00 AM 106.2 04:35:00 AM 151.1 • 257.3 • 05:30:00 AM 325.0
275 04:35:30 AM 104.2 04:35:30 AM 152.5 256.7 05:30:30 AM 3192
a
TABLE 3 (CONTINUED)
SECTION #3 FLOW RATE DATA
SEH INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
MANI IOLL#25 UPS I REAM MANHOLE#25 SPENCER SL•C 1"ION#3 MANHOLE#37
ELAPSED ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992 ANALYZED MARCH 26.1992 UPSTREAM ANALYZED MARCH 26,1992
TIME TIME OF FLOW RATE TIME OF FLOW RATE FLOW RATE TIME OF FLOW RATE
- (MINUTES) SAMPLE (GPM) _ SAMPLE (GPM) (GPM) SAMPLE (GPM)
28 04:36:00 AM 100.6 04:36:00 AM 151.7 252.3 05:31:00 AM 319.2
28.5 04:36:30 AM 96.6 04:36:30 AM 149.0 245.6 05:31:30 AM 316.8
29 04:37:00 AM 94.6 04:37:00 AM 148.5 243.1 05:32:00 AM 316.8
29.5 04:37:30 AM 93.7 04:37:30 AM 150.9 244.5 05:32:30 AM 316.8
30 04:38:00 AM 92.8 04:38:00 AM 151.4 244.2 05:33:00 AM 333.6
30.5 04:38:30 AM 95.5 04:38:30 AM 148.7 244.2 05:33:30 AM 342.6
31 04:39:00 AM 100.8 04:39:00 AM 147.2 248.0 05:34:00 AM 362.4
_ 31.5 04:39:30 AM 106.8 04:39:30 AM 146.9 253.7 05:34:30 AM 396.6
32 04:40:00 AM 119.8 04:40:00 AM 148.2 268.0 05:35:00 AM 409.5
32.5 04:40:30 AM 108.6 04:40:30 AM 145.7 254.2 05:35:30 AM 427.5
33 04:41:00 AM 210.2 04:41:00 AM 145.4 355.6 05:36:00 AM 452.1
_ 33.5 04:41:30 AM 244.0 04:41:30 AM 144.7 388.6 05:36:30 AM 453.7
34 04:42:00 AM 295.0 04:42:00 AM 144.7 439.6 05:37:00 AM 453.7
34.5 04:42:30 AM 299.4 144.5 443.9 05:37:30 AM 488.9
35 04:43:00 AM 327.7 144.3 472.0 05:38:00 AM 426.1
35.5 04:43:30 AM 286.9 144.1 431.0 05:38:30 AM 453.7
36 04:44:00 AM 251.1 144 395.1 05:39:00 AM 455.3
36.5 04:44:30 AM 224.2 143.8 368.0 05:39:30 AM 490.8
37 04:45:00 AM 203.5 143.6 347.1 05:40:00 AM 450.5
37.5 04:45:30 AM 207.1 04:45:30 AM 143.4 350.6 05:40:30 AM 423.2
- 38 04:46:00 AM 172.3 147 319.3 05:41:00 AM 412.1
38.5 04:46:30 AM 157.6 150.6 308.2 05:41:30 AM 391.6
39 04:47:00 AM 147.6 04:47:00 AM 154.2 301.7 05:42:00 AM 374.2
39.5 04:47:30 AM 138.7 04:47:30 AM 144.7 283.4 05:42:30 AM 352.2
40 04:48:00 AM 134.6 04:48:00 AM 143.9 278.6 05:43:00 AM 347.4
40.5 04:48:30 AM 125.5 04:48:30 AM 143.4 268.9 05:43:30 AM 342.6
41 04:49:00 AM 122.2 04:49:00 AM 145.4 267.6 05:44:00 AM 333.6
41.5 04:49:30 AM 117.5 04:49:30 AM 143.2 260.7 05:44:30 AM 329.2
- 42 04:50:00 AM 113.2 04:50:00 AM 143.9 257.1 05:45:00 AM 325.0
42.5 04:50:30 AM 111.8 04:50:30 AM 143.4 255.3 05:45:30 AM 316.8
43 04:51:00 AM 111.8 04:51:00 AM 143.0 254.8 05:46:00 AM 301.6
43.5 04:51:30 AM 142.2 05:46:30 AM 301.6
44 04:52:00 AM 106.4 04:52:00 AM 142.2 248.6 05:47:00 AM 301.6
44.5 05:47:30 AM 294.6
45 04:53:00 AM 106.4 04:53:00 AM 146.9 253.3 05:48:00 AM 289.2
45.5 05:48:30 AM 294.6
46 04:54:00 AM 105.4 04:54:00 AM 148.2 253.7 05:49:00 AM 301.6
46.5 05:49:30 AM 289.2
47 04:55:01)AM 104.2 04:55:00 AM 148.0 252.2 05:50:00 AM 287.8
47.5 05:50:30 AM 287.8
48 1)4:56:00 AM 106.2 04:56:00 AM 145.9 252.1 05:51:00 AM 287.2
--
48.5 05:51:30 AM 287.8
49 04:57:00 AM 106.9 04:57:00 AM 144.7 251.6 05:52:00 AM 293.9
49.5 05:52:30 AM 300.2
50 04:58:00 AM 114.6 04:58:00 AM 144.7 259.3 05:53:00 AM 301.6
-- 50.5 05:53:30 AM 329.2
51 04:59:00 AM 109.2 04:59:00 AM 142.2 251.4 05:54:00 AM 325.0
51.5 05:54:30 AM 287.8
52 05:00:00 AM 1 1 1.8 05:00:00 AM 142.2 254.1 05:55:00 AM 287.8
52.5 05:55:30 AM 204.0
53 05:01:00 AM 111.8 05:01.00 AM 139.9 251.7 05:56:00 AM 188.7
53.505:56:30 AM 210.8
• 54 05:02:00 AM 123.8 05:02:00 AM 138.7 262.5 05:57:00 AM 2322
54.5 05:57:30 AM 263.7
55 05:03:00 AM 123.8 05:03:00 AM 139.2 263.0 05:58:30 AM 309.0
. 1AVLRA(,Ll 4:b-4:36 ( 183.34 4:13-4:36 II 149.0 I 334.3 I 3:10-3:31 II 367.3
N
_ U d T
U W
10 Cn
,J i-
_ I>
I _ U)
IW _ (D �
12 Cn
— I!- 11-
1_i
1J
l> Z
Im -
— Ir
Zo o 0
0 -f to co COcD
11= r co
I<
. Ij O
I .5-
Iii
C7
rn rn
UJ I co rn
IZ W T N CO
rW
IO
! I I
(� co i N r- O
CO ) I Ch O) up.N
OJ N to C`') v N to ^ Cn
IW Co Co O) '- N CC) CO CO
W
W
IW
1w
IQ
_ i
0co
Z O Comiri'} to o o U) LLn to
lcr0c5 4ui 446
It-— — oN rno tntno
Rain ° .ttr) r � r
IO iii ih co v v 4 iri
12
1 ct
1w
ii a_
U
tZ 0 co CO N a W co
1� ik lk N N
I< m I = 4t * _
CO co U 2 2to
O 2 _ = N
j 2 J 2 2
O I
cc
0 w cc w w cc w ¢ ¢ w< w
O ~ < 12 cn Q L-1-.J W z w
Lu Z z 0 I� u U ZUJ a U D0_ 0 °
cc
u, 2 DO DO
� � ,- OZ NOZ NOOZ
u
0'`� z 0
T
= z
Z C" Q Mo a r-
J Q 1 o
w Z i� 11
co
0 0 cYt
N
CD
w
8 W Q0
coo Li--
T
1 .T M �
o0 La
D J
O Q
`1-' o
0
>. CO
Oz
u.. Q
oo .4-
.
WF
c.,
L O J
T Zz Tn
O
,„.
,_
-a,
W 0 o Z
� O E
c
T w Q
o a DW
C)
T W
Tli\ e
20
M z
T
0
00
T �;r
›- z
0
0
TtD
QW O
0z z
v, o 0
T wF
zQ
*, Z
T c,
w
wCZ z a.
z 0 0
T _-1 Y o
.T 0 bt: www
Li
T _ co
z 2
M W
V)
TIC
T
LI4 0 z
cn
0
W
U O
c = C\J
O c o �
(l ` O = • W
_ V •
O d ti in m CC
� oa� li ISc ' N N 0
d U
1 O col
O � E TV O �-
+� O I
Z Q 0 (1) U kit
CO
1 W 0 Cl. c
W
!--- D
._
o
:
I t SV% z t
7 ro s1 _ 4
v
1 a>c U CD r X
LLJ II
•
_ I--
0
Q -
0 x
J x
I-- 4 a
— Q U) o Z
o I— Cl) 0
- F— z V) O
Z 0 0 ZQ n
I- U U z 5 1 w
J
LI z
W ', �, Q LA
O w
i--- CY o (� > Y. F-
0 �� LU ¢ o <
c
_ �
D E O cnU' Z
J j z =
ir C 0 _J
Li_ _._, ,_ 0 LA
O
r
G V
X C
O
U
O
N
I Coco
O
Ift W
in
i r
4i*Iiiii-__
- ;I- / a
rn -1' lit
■
V J
D . _ i_. )f b-a
u) -r- . 01
W $i- 0
cc _ co 00
COLLI1-tf.I- ■_ 4,_
in LI)
W < f----VI-I- -CV =
- CC Cc ■■
_ D -14T 'I-,
IP o W CO
0
0 t ._._„,
,■ 2
E.
__ 1in T
NI
zI 1
T
0 I■
(I) .:j iii+
ii
1
■A
■ O
N O CO CO d' N O CO CC) 'I' N
- O O CO CO CO CO CO N- N. I-
_ (Vide) a1VEJ MOld
0
- lr-
II- 4
+ + 0
(I)
- I—
J
- U) + - in D
W in
_ C N
d' w r
_ I - -0 a _
2
L11 < c
- CC cc . 2
_•ems-, W
o 0 co
0 s' ~
LL CV
LL c\,
- z -N =
o
fl
II
U I
_ L1Jo
U) _
O 0 0 0 O
1 I I 0 I I 0 00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- h. CD In d-. CO . N r
(vjdo) 21vJMo1d
0
1
■ Lo
� -tet
-et i 0
_J +As e
D 44+ I-IN
V3
In w m s
W < ++-
- CC CC A-+ ii) Ln .=-
0-+#14,411 N t
_ D 4-4.- w Lr)
0 _J
LL co 4
z I-_______t______+.+, r
II
O •
- o
0
_ w it ■
CID 1 1.0
-
I I I I I 1 I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0p
in o in 0 . in o 10 o in o
- (0 (0 to IC) 1- d- CO CO N N
(v'ido) 21Vdl MOld
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
0 r sE0
YYY
REVISED 1`�
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Nominations to Boards and Commissions
DATE: January 4 , 1994
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
Terms on various boards and commissions will be expiring on
January 31, 1994 . According to council policy, it is appropriate
to make nominations to boards and commissions at this time.
Appointments will then be made at the next city council meeting.
When there is more than one interested applicant for a particular
opening, the interview committee will be interviewing the
applicants, prior to the January 18th city council meeting.
It has been past practice to nominate all applicants to the
boards and/or commissions for which they have applied.
The openings and applicants are as follows:
1] Planning Commission (2)
Jane Dubois
Terry Joos*
Pat Dauenhauer
Gary Morke
2] Energy and Transportation Committee (3)
3 ] Park and Recreation Advisory Board (2)
Anne Seifert*
Paulette Rislund*
4] Board of Review (5)
Eldon Reinke*
Richard Marks*
Steve Clay*
Councilor
councilor
5] Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals
Housing Advisory & Appeals Board (1)
Gene Juergens*
6] Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (1)
Gloria Vierling
Terry Joos
7] Police Civil Service Commission (1)
Stan Von Bokern*
Gary Morke
8] Cable Communications Advisory Commission (1)
Shakopee Community Access Corporation Board of Directors
Larry Moonen*
9] Community Development Commission (2)
Jon Albinson*
Gary Morke
Charles Brandmire*
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Move to make nominations to Boards and Commissions as follows:
to Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment and Appeals, Jane
Dubois, Terry Joos, Pat Dauenhauer, and Gary Morke; to Park and
Recreation Advisory Board, Anne Seifert and Paulette Rislund; to
Board of Review, Eldon Reinke, Steve Clay and Richard Marks; to
Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals/Housing Advisory &
Appeals Board, Gene Juergens; to Shakopee Public Utilities
Commission, Gloria Vierling and Terry Joos; to Police Civil Service
Commission, Stan Von Bokern and Gary Morke; to Community
Development Commission, Jon Albinson, Gary Morke, and Charles
Brandmire; to the Cable Communications Advisory Commission &
Shakopee Community Access Corporation Board of Directors, Larry_
Moonen.
* Indicates incumbents
/5 Q,
" OISENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Nominations to Boards and Commissions
DATE: December 30, 1993
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
Terms on various boards and commissions will be expiring on
January 31, 1994 . According to council policy, it is appropriate
to make nominations to boards and commissions at this time.
Appointments will then be made at the next city council meeting.
When there is more than one interested applicant for a particular
opening, the interview committee will be interviewing the
applicants, prior to the January 18th city council meeting.
It has been past practice to nominate all applicants to the
boards and/or commissions for which they have applied.
The openings and applicants are as follows:
1] Planning Commission (2)
Jane Dubois
Terry Joos*
Pat Dauenhauer
Gary Morke
2] Energy and Transportation Committee (3)
3] Park and Recreation Advisory Board (2)
Anne Seifert*
4] Board of Review (5)
Eldon Reinke*
Richard Marks*
Councilor
councilor
5] Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals
Housing Advisory & Appeals Board (1)
Gene Juergens*
6] Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (1)
Gloria Vierling
Terry Joos
7] Police Civil Service Commission (1)
Stan Von Bokern*
Gary Morke
8] Cable Communications Advisory Commission (1)
Shakopee Community Access Corporation Board of Directors
9] Community Development Commission (2)
Jon Albinson*
Gary Morke
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Move to make nominations to Boards and Commissions as follows:
to Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment and Appeals, Jane
Dubois, Terry Joos, Pat Dauenhauer, and Gary Morke; to Park and
Recreation Advisory Board, Anne Seifert; to Board of Review, Eldon
Reinke and Richard Marks; to Building Code Board of Adjustments and
Appeals/Housing Advisory & Appeals Board, Gene Juergens; to
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission, Gloria Vierling and Terry
Joos; to Police Civil Service Commission, Stan Von Bokern and Gary
Morke; to Community Development Commission, Jon Albinson and Gary
Morke.
* Indicates incumbents
APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS
City of Shakopee
129 East 1st Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City
Boards and/or Commissions.
What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory
Boards and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except
where non residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more
importantly, you must have an interest in serving your community.
The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and
typically have from one to two meetings per month, as follows:
Planning Commission/Board of 1st
Thursday
30after 1st
Tuesday Adjustments and Appeals rs
.m.
Community Development Commission 3rd Wednesday at 5: 00 p.m.
Energy & Transportation Committee 3rd Wednesday at 7: 00
p.m.
Cable Communication Commission Quarterly o7r30ly spneeded on
Mm.
Housing Advisory and Appeal Board As Needed
Building Code Board of Adjustment As Needed
& Appeals
Shakopee Public Utilities 1st Monday at 4 : 30 p.m.
Commission
Park & Recreation Advisory Board 4th Monday at 7 : 00 p.m.
Police Civil Service Commission As Needed
Community Youth Building 2nd Saturday of the month
Committee at 9 : 00 a.m.
Board of Review 7 : 00 p.m. 2 to 3 Tuesdays
in May
ri
Name: nikal MO .K1`
Address: lIUWZ 1v1�'i'r'+ < +� S
Phone: (H) LR (B) ceLiU -1 W7
How long have you been a resident of Shakopee? / S �z� 5 +
Occupation:
Does your work require you to travel? (check one)
A great deal Periodically Very little SNot at all
C��'
Do you have any special interests or training which you feel a
particular board or commission could use? (Use separate sheet if
necessary) .-c>&.) i "rpo'rc-sAk t ry Cow.r,&L t Al
•
Board or Commission in which you are interested? Pc l :eP C i u < < Sc,,-,cc.
l b 6...w`.....v•-•1C/c1
D2 u'et v c)OA t `R N N 1 K-'9
Please statebriefly why you are interested in serving on this
Board/Commission for which you are submitting an application:
Vkp \ Z o Q E /rV o 0 L. u C-'t7 t� i T H o Lg. Y C CD.VA.ut*t u l t6v -y
hn-) n r=-eeL- TN vi i t eOu�t- lam MAK #2 c. t'>os 1 - iv/
Q.
eo,0 - L ; 000
Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any
activity, recommended action, or decision from which the individual
has or could have the potential to receive personal gain, whether
it be direct or indirect.
In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or
equitable interest in any business, however organized, which could
be constructed as a conflict of interest? Yes No >4-- . If yes,
please provide the details on a separate sheet of paper.
Please list three references (Name, Address and Phone) :
1.-To LAA. \- -Q w P ( 774-57-oit d,205-5 cJ I�ec c
2 . k.Q%I-4Ni LO O 4/96 -/2 /Z
3 . ___-- _ •VCV0 7.4 2 Dick /Vc�2vS7, —4-4' evI ,-
r ,c E pc-1,-c,-ix,A..1
I here// certify that he facts within the foregoing application
/
ar ue . .".i, c• -ct i
� � ' o the best of my knowledge.
G
1
Signature
RETURN APPLICATION AND
/ r:3-- 2____ PLEDGE TO:
Date City Clerk
City of Shakopee
129 East 1st Avenue
" " Shakopee, MN 55379
445-3650
DATE RECEIVED:
AND/OR COMMISSIONS
APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL
CityDofSORY ShakopeeDS AND/
129 East 1st Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City
Boards and/or Commissions.
What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory
Boards and Commissions? You must be a resident
resolution, e, except
t
where non residency is permitted by community.
importantly, you must have an interest in serving your
The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and
typically have from one to two meetings per month, as follows:
1st Thursday after 1st
Planning Commission/Board of Tuesday at 7 : 30 p.m.
Adjustments and Appeals
Community Development Commission 3rd Wednesday at 5:00 p.m.
Energy & Transportation Committee 3rdWednesday at 7 : 00
P •
Cable Communication Commission Quarterly or as needed on
Monday at 7 : 30 p.m.
Housing Advisory and Appeal Board As Needed
Building Code Board of Adjustment As Needed
& Appeals
Shakopee Public Utilities 1st Monday at 4 : 30 p.m.
Commission
Park & Recreation Advisory Board 4th Monday at 7 : 00 p.m.
Police Civil Service Commission As Needed
h
c--- . • • . . :. . ::g a- = - - -
7 : 00 p.m. 2 to 3 Tuesdays
Board of Review in May P^` cc ,� ,���&* Address:
Name• �
Phone: (H) ` � 5 - �2(i7
�
How long have you been a resident of Shakopee?
Occupation:
Does your work require you to travel? (check one)
Y' ver little Not at all
A great deal Periodically Y
• r
Do you have any special interests or training which you feel a
particular board or commission could use?, (Use separate sheet if
necessary) S S2V6,o c/A) 1-PF- CL1u,ec.f+ PAi,s N Co,v jicr l
41s/ yr F-W-r2 S ,r
Board or Commission in which you are interested?
PIA-NiviN§ CCe'n vl-, kz
Please state briefly why you are interested in serving on this
Board/Commission for which you are submitting an application:
S It a c jLa:- /S 4 £ 2.t.a± G,/cZ o r/l.5 Cr /9 AD Gtid ]/3 l,/G• 7? S�t
j�- c)FFiS/L A5 : ac.4 4'- j2'S/gL )t f/ I?F
Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any
activity, recommended action, or decision from which the individual
has or could have the potential to receive personal gain, whether
it be direct or indirect.
In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or
equitable interest in any business, however organized, which could
be constructed as a conflict of interest? Yes No X . If yes,
please provide the details on a separate sheet of paper.
Please list three references (Name, Address and
� Phone) :
1. _Tctr VC(�P7/N 5,� 7 NQy7��LnL Ni cr Cf 1cCr'1 4 'e - 3 jU L 0,60 ,
2 . &U> r� 05. C, C .lye. -st�✓C/c/rt5c SYS- '2i,
3 . C6-72ai }11 30 f, - X095/ Qic;
I hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application
are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
///Cct 6.eAA:t i.11�li
Signature
RETURN APPLICATION AND
PLEDGE TO:
/1- ,;-7 (73
Date City Clerk
City of Shakopee
129 East 1st Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
445-3650
tom.
r::-
DATE
-.DATE RECEIVED:
DEC 2r!
APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS
City of Shakopee
129 East 1st Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City
Boards and/or Commissions.
What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory
Boards and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except
where non residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more
importantly, you must have an interest in serving your community.
The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and
typically have from one to two meetings per month, as follows:
Planning Commission/Board of 1st Thursday after 1st
Adjustments and Appeals Tuesday at 7 : 30 p.m.
Community Development Commission 3rd Wednesday at 5: 00 p.m.
Energy & Transportation Committee 3rd Wednesday at 7: 00
p.m.
Cable Communication Commission Quarterly or as needed on
Monday at 7 : 30 p.m.
Housing Advisory and Appeal Board As Needed
Building Code Board of Adjustment As Needed
& Appeals
Shakopee Public Utilities 1st Monday at 4 :30 p.m.
Commission
Park & Recreation Advisory Board 4th Monday at 7: 00 p.m.
Police Civil Service Commission As Needed
Community Youth Building 2nd Saturday of the month
Committee at 9 : 00 a.m.
Board of Review 7: 00 p.m. 2 to 3 Tuesdays
in May
Name• TTrJt. P . )// Address: ii U- ,
Phone: (H) 6/4/7 %i:5 (B) � G4'
How long have you been a resident of Shakopee?
Occupation: )cog 4J%U,('
Does your work require you to travel? (check one)
A great deal Periodically Very little `"/Not at all
Do you have any special interests or training which you feel a
particular board or commission could use? (Use separate sheet if
necessary) g5EE 47774C24E A
Board or Commission in which you are interested? i°44/.4U/A10 -
60//,//5S/(M.V%Df�, 6 D` /M /lf:7T/1EX)i:SAO) /i/* gLS
Please state briefly why you are interested in serving on this
Board/Commission for which you are submitting an application:
PEEL , Lf} we b / o1Qz E L y t,eaaiTft (S Cid iT/C!fL 1v �c�
3 %U L 4 ?S . /fI L'/Cc J� //� .�:i 5 • /oma 1,Ad rJ •
FAL
-"WE- hm).s OF 70,6- ,44,0 iNG CP/1107. k)/L
SA=E 2�Ac? 'iV& E-PPECTS P& Ve--44s ce-4C
Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any
activity, recommended action, or decision from which the individual
has or could have the potential to receive personal gain, whether
it be direct or indirect.
In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or
equitable interest in any business, however organized, yhich could
be constructed as a conflict of interest? Yes No . - If yes,
please provide the details on a separate sheet of paper.
Please list three references (Name, Address and Phone) :
1. ieici,Ln,eb 7-, /ZIUkeED/11 I i e & ob DUe,E T�. 57/7¢,'o9,' W4-4.3 7
2 .A5, /Me/ 5.0. ✓llS#AI-XMc 4a/S�4444/
3 . fl 4. imt.K /400-4-4 S/�A/C d �c��1� 414/S-"---
I
14/s"
I hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application
are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature r
RETURN APPLICATION AND
PLEDGE TO:
//`i k
Dat�e City Clerk
City of Shakopee
129 East 1st Avenue
• Shakopee, MN 55379
445-3650
DATE RECEIVED:
/J
TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
r,,T,
FROM: Vernice Takumi, Accountant
RE: Interfund Transfers \\,
DATE: December 20, 1993
Introduction
Council approval of equipment fund transfers for 1993 is requested.
Background
Transfer from the Capital Equipment Fund to the General Fond for the
purchase of the following items:
Police
Squad Farmington Ford 12,815.00
Deputy Registrar 5.50
Streicher's 1,705.33
Grafix Shoppe 282.23
Gas Supply Inc. 1,795.72
Squad Superior Ford 13,484.00
Deputy Registrar 5.50
State of Minn. 350.00
Grafix Shoppe 282.23
Gas Supply Inc. 2,390.00
Unmarked Grossman Chev. 14,884.00
Deputy Registrar 987.96
Comm Auditors Equip. 167.27
Grossman Chev. 100.00
Fire
Mobile Radios Communication Auditors 3,825.48
Rescue Tools Smeal Fire Equipment 4,020.38
Boat Great American Marine 8,244.00
Deputy Registrar 74.44
Street
Alley Grader Lano Equipment 50,295.16
Dump Truck Northstar Intrnt'1 Inc. 46,882.00
Crysteel Dist Inc 20,329.44
Deputy Registrar 3,067.83
Various for Parts 529.31
Shop
Card Sys. Westside Equip. 24,624.95
Scope Snap-On Tools Corp. 18,007.00
Park
Muck Thane Hawkins Polar Chev. 14,183.00
Carb & Turbo Sy Inc. 725.21
Various for Parts 842.41
Midland Equip. 9,105.75
Deputy Registrar 942.40
Mower MIT Dist Co. 35,022.52
MTI Dist Co. 341.87
Total 290,317.89
Action Requested
Transfer from the Capital Equipment Fund to the General Fund $290,317.89
for the purchase of equipment in 1993.
/Sca,
r,,Or'srn7'1T
'r
TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Bids For Full Size Squad Car
DATE: December 9, 1993
Introduction
The 1994 budget contains an appropriation for the purchase of a squad car.
Background
The 1994 budget includes an appropriation of $16,500 for the purchase of a
squad car. Funding is from the Capital Equipment Fund. The Hennepin County
purchasing cooperative did not bid full size squads this year but instead is
buying off the state contract.
The new car will replace a 1990 model. The final cost of the new car will
exceed the budgeted amount due to the cost of the extended warranty, increased
vehicle cost, modifications in equipment for dual air bags and the increased cost
for the propane conversion. Many of the items for the propane fuel that are
removed from the old car can not be used on the new car because of model
differences. The budget difference could run as much as $2,500 and can be
covered by a budget amendment later. Council will recall that the 1994 budget
was prepared early in 1993. This resulted in putting together 1994 numbers
before the cost of the 1993 conversions were known.
The bid for the full size car is as follows;
Base bid $13,889.00
Options:
Map light 34.00
Deck lid lights 95.00
Extended Warranty 590.00
Shop manual 90.00
Total 14,408.00
Alternatives
1. Buy as per above.
2. Buy as per above but modify options.
3. Rebid on our own.
4. Don't buy a full size squad.
Recommendation
Alternative number 1.
Action
Move to authorize the purchase of a full size police squad from Superior
Ford in the amount of $14,708.00 plus delivery in accordance with the state
contract.
15.k/
C];(X " 7- 7:MT
TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Purchase of 1994 Compact Pickup
DATE: December 9, 1993
Introduction
The 1994 budget contains $13,000 for the purchase of a compact pickup for
the Engineering Division.
Background
The 1994 budget contains $13,000 for a compact pickup. Funds are allocated
in the Capital Equipment Fund for this purchase. The Hennepin County Purchasing
Co-operative contract for the compact pickup has been awarded to Polar Chevrolet.
The cost is as follows:
Base bid $8,356.00
Options;
Air Conditioning 648.00
Radio AM/FM 100.00
Service manual 20.00
Total 9,124.00
Alternatives
1. Buy unit as per above.
2. Modify options.
3. Rebid unit on our own.
4. Do not buy truck this year.
Recommendation
Alternative number 1. The cut off to place an order under the Hennepin
County contract is January 14, 1994.
Action Requested
Move to authorize the purchase of a compact pickup from Polar Chevrolet in
the amount of $9,124.00 under the Hennepin County Cooperative contract.
157,1
T0: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Bids For Surburban (Fire Dept)
DATE: December 9, 1993
Introduction
The 1994 budget contains an appropriation for the purchase of a surburban
for the Fire Chief.
Background
The 1994 budget includes an appropriation of $28,000 for the purchase of a
surburban. The Hennepin County purchasing cooperative contract bid for the
surburban and the options requested by the Fire Department is as follows;
Base bid $19,476.00
Options;
Dual spotlight 248.00
4x4 1,855.00
Power locks 322.00
Power windows 400.00
Dark tinted windows 250.00
Tilt steering 135.00
Cruise control 180.00
Towing package 175.00
H.D. Alternator 75.00
Total 23,116.00
Alternatives
1. Buy as per above.
2. Buy as per above but modify options.
3. Rebid on our own.
4. Don't buy a surburban.
Recommendation
Alternative number 1.
Action
Move to authorize the purchase of a surburban from Polar Chevrolet in the
amount of $23,116.00 in accordance with the Hennepin County Cooperative contract.
CO1\13EIT
TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Purchase of Computer Bridge
DA1'h: December 16, 1993
Introduction
Council authorization to place an order for a computer bridge is requested.
Background
A computer bridge is a communications device to connect city hall to the LOGIS
computer consortium. The purchase has been recommended by the computer committee
and funding is from the Capital Equipment Fund in the 1994 budget in the total
estimated amount of $9,500. The bridge will replace the MUX which is obsolete,
slower and less reliable. When the bridge is installed, Shakopee will be on a
wide area network with LOGIS. Shakopee is the second to last LOG'S city to
upgrade to a bridge. The purchase would be through LOGIS.
Alternatives
1. Deny the request.
2. Approve the request.
Recommendation
Alternative number 2.
Action Requested
Move to authorize the purchase and installation of a computer bridge in the
estimated amount of $9,500.
jsVc
Attached is a print out showing the division budget status as
of 12/29/93 for 1993 based on data entered as of that date. There
appears to be a few divisions running close to their budget and
General Government Buildings will go over budget.
12/29/93
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
EXPENSES BY DEPARTMENT
CURRENT YEAR
ANNUAL MONTH TO PERCENT
DEPT DEPT NAME BUDGET ACTUAL DATE EXPENDED
11 MAYOR & COUNCIL 69,140 4,838 55,650 80
12 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 198,110 19,144 185,981 94
13 CITY CLERK 114,510 7,226 106,618 93
15 FINANCE 273,520 17,104 237,209 87
16 LEGAL COUNSEL 158,120 10,295 140,815 _ 89
17 PLANNING 376,940 15,814 290,467 77
18 GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 119,426 20,074 119,162 100
31 POLICE 1,432,630 94,190 1,302,405 91
32 FIRE 255,820 7,429 226,620 89
33 INSPECTION-BLDG-PLMBG-HTG 165,804 10,649 141,045 85
41 ENGINEERING 342,720 20,614 268,213 78
42 STREET MAINTENANCE 688,710 47,308 547,227 79
44 SHOP 149,420 10,127 121,740 81
46 PARK MAINTENANCE 318,770 13,966 279,854 88
48 REFUSE COLLECTION 521,389 42,580 464,126 89
61 POOL 150,300 2,457 143,030 95
64 RECREATION 214,011 15,894 185,221 87
91 UNALLOCATED 1,142,645 205 504,301 44
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 6,691,985 359,914 5,319,684 79
17 PLANNING 360,860 23,744 302,919 84
TOTAL TRANSIT 360,860 23,744 302,919 84
12 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 64,870 3,712 47,732 74
TOTAL HRA 64,870 3,712 47,732 44
00 N/A 339,400 0 0 0
TOTAL CAPITAL EQUIP REVOLVING FUND 339,400 0 0 0
C) n
0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o o x 0
.A w w ' 43 '. w w VD0Z
• _ ° )
--..i ---iON as x n
CTCT CSN
00 OO OO\ CT OCT O. H
oI
O. Ln .D CO
-C. W N H ZZ r
n
H H H H H H H H H H H r H H < H H H H H H n x
.D .O .O .D .O .o .O .D .o .D .D •D .D •D 0 .D .o .O .D .0 .O Cl C)
.D .o .O .O .O .0 .O .D .D .O •D .O .D .o H .o .O .D .D .D .O CTl c)
.0 1, .- .- 1, 4, 4, 4, 4- 4, .- 4, W W 0 W W Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) 0 7C
\\\\\\\\\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H H H H H H H A
HHHHHHHHH H H H N N NN N N N N 0 CI
\\\\\\\\\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ a 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N) N N N N ►-3 H
HHHHHHHHH H H H NO .D NN 0 0 0 0 CT) Ci)
'3
CI
n 7d
x
•CO to rt)
<I) -CO <I) v) v+ v+ C) '-3
H H H H H H -Cl)
.N -CO </) -Cl) {/) -Cl) t/) .. - - - -
'Cl) H N </)'Cl)'Cl)N 'Cl)'Cl) N) N H . 4- N Cl) 0 0 O. O. .D .D Cp Oo a
A v CO CO .0 co � co O. �) .O A 4- N W O. O. CO CO W Cl) O. CT M e
W - -4 v Cl) �! �! (r) �l N 0 N -) �) {/) {A -Cl) -Cl) H CO 0 0 CO CO Cl) Cl) N N 0
0
Q. Q. Cl) Cl) Q. Q. Cl) O. Cl) In . r Cl) Cl) 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 F 4, 0 0 0 0 2
Cl) C' .0 - 4 - .� �, -Ps .D .C- v+ 00 00 00 0 .r` 00 � v+ 00 I-' H Cl)o
H
aaaaaaaaa CM C IV � Po H o
N Cl) Cl) Cl) C/) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl)
siZo
cn cn cn cn rn v) C/) C/) C/) tri rT) r 'e Cx) Ch voi H
000000000 :� 7d '� r e, H Cl) 1-4
nnnnnnnnn 00 H P PO Cl) CTl n Cn
ZMMZM1 t as a - C) 0> .-3 0 txi O to CCT7 0
CT) CTl tx1) ril) CT) CT) ril) CT) CT) z Z Z ' O Z z c,'
n n n n n n n n n H 0 r CO r
acxxxxxxxx roro H 0 tr32 H to 0 N
C70C) C) C70nno as r H 2 a r 2 0 'T) )O ••
000000000 C/1 C/) CT) 2 r 0 H H H
ZZZZZZZZZ 'b r' Cl) > Cl) P-3 C/)
H -31-3 )-31-3 -31-3P-31-3 H H 'Z
'ro :O 'ro :V 'A :V '� 7y C) C) H a 0 PV It
H It
H H H H H H H H H 0 7C
2ZZZZZZZZ 0 r N
c )c) nc) c) 00c) c) z 0
Pt)
n Cn '71
r7 r
W Cd Co Cc) rA Co O' W W O O Pt 9 y --n H ITS H CTl H
HHHHHHHHH o o o o ro ro 0 ,.< P.< 0 � o rrorl
O
ro �
H• HHHHHHHH H H H 1-3 H Cl)C0
0r I a H 2 H 2 C7
z Z z Z z Z z z Z H H Cr) r > z Cl) Cf) Cl) CC/)
nc) nc) c� c) nnc) 00 Ho
n
V V V V V V V V V Cl) i) 2 rEn
r CleV
,1:1 'b) a a a H
H H H H H H H H H 0 0 r ,-C I.0
ZZZZZZZZZ ro ro a 1O b > > 9 H
HHHHHHHHH C%' r [CT) o r'
H H 7' 1-.4 n cr--7 rTl z
n x C=7
C/) CTl H x Cr)
V) V) H
n
CT1 i
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .D . .D .D .D 0 •D .O .O .
D a
O. H H C.) W A H H H 4, 4, Cl) •D `D co Co O` Co co Co , 0
N Cb C)O N H N 0O CO 00 N H N .D .D H H � H 4, O , O
CO H H H H H .0 C,) N H H N 0 0 0 0 H 0 0
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 11 1 I I I c
.0 4- 4, - A 4, i A 4- .C- A A l- N N A N N N , Z
N N N N N N N N) N N N Cl) .L H H N H N H , H
Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl Cl) H H H W W CO v H v 0 v
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl) Cl) 0 CT 0 Cr. #
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 2
1-4
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
r . r � .r` r4, ,� r rr w H H H H H H
H
w wwwC+3Cr) C) 4) Cl) 4, t,..) Cl) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HHHHHHHHH H 0 0 co v O. Cl' w n
0 hn
H
ro
0
z
a
Cl
o0
CD
z
0 H
H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H '-'3 `3 H,,, H H >
,-11 'V .11 ..c1 ro 0-0 011 ro ~ .11 "b .-c, X X X' X
0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o x o
Zs Zs Zs 4s Zs - is Zs Zs Zs 0 Z
0 0 ON 0 as a\ O. O\ O. rn o% O\ x 0
.O .a .a .a CO 0) 00 H
0) V O. A W N r 0 .a 03 V Z r
0
r r r rr rrr r r 0
%.0 .0 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 1/40 r r r r
.O .D .O .O w .a .D .0 .O .tea .a te � .a .° X 4, 4, Ill
0
Zs -s Zs Zs r Zs r r r 4, 0 77
\0 \ \ \\ \\\ \ \ \ 0 0 0 x
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0Pci
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \
F-. H H r r H H H H 0 0 0 0 H H
H H H H H CTI tn
H
• til
0 :V
N N
W W NN NN Cxi))
rr rr NN F-. I--. 0 H
N N .. .. H H A Zs x
N N N N N
4. A O. O. W W N N r a• .O O 4 0) 03 .a .0 r r V -4 r r 0 0 (..n
0) CO 00 0) 0' O. O\ O. .a N 4, 0 V Na N O. a. to to 0 0 4- A 0 0 N 0 /CD
N N 0 0 0 0 N to rn .a V .a w 03 CO N N CO 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Z
• to to 0 0 0 O r O. to O. r 0 to O. a. 0 o V+ to 0 0 A A O 0 -O. 1-3 LI)
* * * * * * * * * * * * 0
0 00 0 C) C) C0 n 0 W 0z w CO to H
'b r-' tt "0v it$ .07:1HH .�C H x V) w
FC t _'
HHH 20 z 9 to z 0
'iy Cr) E0 CZ) 0 .� H ti H
H H 0 00 � <ril 03
••
`d Z 0 0 H x - C7 t7
Z x h:1H 0 N
H V) C) 7C 0 9 tri? r
Z
0 73 1-3 0 d r
H 0
H Iii H
H H H
o r
z r
t=1
ro H CT113 I ,0o PJ o C H H 0 CO
til ro 0 r r a H C CO H ro tri H
7C1 "i) til trl H Z H (/) r
....3 Cl) "C H ~v C) :� CO O C7
H CO V) 0 0 tx, Z t H a \ C11 H Z CO
CZ) CO7 H ttx1 tZ•) H\ H H vr) Cr, tri
CZ) C) 0
z z
Cl) H a g 00 V) H to H
C to r > b7 > z H V) H
'rod Cr) ZHZ H '.rod H H
HH
COCr: H H 0
CO < Z H Z C z
V) a z > r CO
H n
0 Z 0 Z H
CO 0 C) 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a
r .a H H 4, r V w r cm
r N r r N.) O. r to O. N.) N) W H 03 0
F. .0 r r r r r H r V H H H w 0
I 1 I I I 1 I I I II I I
C
r r r r4, .r` rr w ton 4:5 r Z
H w H N N N W N A N N N H
to wrr w
0 0 0 r r 0 0 0 VI LP 0 0 O 0 It
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 til 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 tr 0 0 0 O 0 H
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t,.) 0 0 00 Z
A 4- 1 r a. 4- 0 a C
.r` A w w w w w w to LI) t,, t,, W w 0
H 0 CO .a .a V V V to O. to 4- W N H
r C)
CO CO
ro
0
z
C
"C
CO
z
CD
H HH H H H H u H H H C N
"C "0 "0 '0 "0 "C '7. H H H
0 C)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0
r 4, -N r r r r r r r 4- r r to c
r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0 Z
"i "i v "4 "4 -4 -4 - ON 7C 0
H H o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •0 H
H o .0 03 -4 O. In A w N H O •0 ZO r
0
H r H H H H r H H H H H H 0 x
v3 .o .0 V) '0 VD .0 .o x
.O .O .0 .0 •0 .D .0 .O .0 .O .0 'O .O til C)
r 4- r r .r` r � r r r r .� � 0 7C
\ \ x
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PV
H H H H H H H H r H H H H C7 tTi
P,' 0
O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H
H H H r H r H H H H H H H tii U)
txi
o 7c
X
tri
-ch <0 NN NV) NN C) H
NN D-' I--. F" F-' NN 7C
<a V) V)N - - V) V) <I)V) VD N - - - - - -
r r V) V) -VD V) r r w w 1� 4, w w r r V) V) .0 .D N N '0 '0
V)V) F" F-• NN F-' F-. NN V+ In FP I--' -i v NN F-. I-' 4, 4, .O .o v v 0
-4 -4 N N .P .A V+ VI r r co to 0 0 .O .0 0 0 V+ VI .A � 0 0 0 OD
A
O' C, 0 0 '0 '0 0) 07 w w •O .0 0'• O' O 0 .0 .0 00 00 O 0 O 0 O 0 2
0 0 0 0 ( Vt V+ L7' ON O` w w . 'D 'O A 4, V+ 0 0 N N 0=0 '-3 w0
* * * * * * * * * * * *
F"
x x x x x x x 0 0 rn VI 0 C) 0
FC
t0� P a z a H [CTI w
Z cn ro
H H co - W Cn 0O
H a 2 cn 0 H CO H z y Co
< 0
HH H
0 H t• 0
�cc� O t-' O C) r r
`2 z 2 Po H 0 t•v
t1 < Z
P> Z C) 0 Cl) H
r VI H 0 0O 0 75 r
2 z a PC,
z
H C) H H
2 2
0 o
z
ti) 0 VI
ro3 y 0 broro
PJ PC ,-0
trio CT7 o CTi tTi tri 0 tx) 0
C 'T1 '=7
t tc�7 trn-' 1-3 N 1-3
f-3 y r 0 H V) 0
2 v) H Cl) z H H H Z Cn H to
C) C o C C) 0 C) C) 0 Ex o 7z)to En a U) v)a to to N cn tTl a H
H t' H c t" c C c H 'U C) r �-i
P-0
H V) H b cn ro b b H a tT7 N H
rh 0 t 0
H 2 'id z H 'id H z a C
CC H) H 0 tT7 C txi CI [T7 0 03 H
cn tTi H CI V1 to to to CI CrT7 O
0 C) 0
txi Cx)
O o 0 o O` O' O• 0 O 0 '0 '0 0 a
L.) .t` r 4, N O. N rn H A 00 o H 0
�! N A 0
H r O' NH H rr 0
r r r 1-• N N N r r r 0 r
1 I I I I I I I I IN I Z
• 4.- A 4, .P .A 4, 4:- 4, H w H
N w co w N co N N N w 1-• lT r
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4k
0 0 .L" 0 0 r 0 r 0 0 r N N
0 0 r 0 ON ON 0 0 0 0 0 00 H
D r
0 0 0 0 • 0 w 0 0 0 w •O C
4, r 0 .t -...Ir r A 0
r v, r .� r 0 r r r r 00 .0 0
-4 V+ O' 0 -4 v+ O' .� w I-I
C)
4, tin
r
4,
ro
0
z
g
ro
C.)
cro
m
2
U:
H H H H ,Hd ,Hd t>
H H H H H H H - 11:1P-10 'V 'V ro 1-0 'V 'V ,TJ '11
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0
C) 0
r 4' r r r r r r r r Si C
r r r r r r 4, r r 0 Z
V - V V V V - V V V x C)
N N H H H H H H H H H
H 0 .D 00 V O. In 4, W N Z r
O
C)
H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H C) x
.0 .D .o .O .O .O .D .D .D .O .O .D .O .D .D .O .O x Cn
.O .O .O .D .D .D .D .D .D .D .0 .D .D .O .O .D .D til C)
r 4, r r r r 4, r r r 4, r 4, 4, r r 0 x
\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ 71
CD 0 000000 o O O o O o 00 0 70
H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H C7 til
-SSS \ \ \ \� \ 9 0
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O F-] H
H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H til Cl)
H
til
0 PO
PC
Ill
<A <A -CO <A H H <A 0 H
1 H N N '.O A In x
<A - -CO <J>-co to - -Co -CO -co - - </) </) - - -co to 0
N N ., H OD O. CO W V) <A H H W W <A </) W W .O V H V+ V+ P.
Vi Cl)<A N H N Na .D V+ 0 -CO -CO In V+ O O CT CT V V H H .P 4' .D A 4' Z C7
O CD O+ N 4, V+ .O W O CO .D .O CO CO O O O 0 w w V ,4 H Na CO O O O tD
C n
O W W H V U . V+ O. H F CO CO N N In In W W V V W .D A CO Co Z
O Co Co Co 4, O. V O. 0. 4- O. rn 0 O V+ V+ V V Co CO 0 0 w O w 0 0' H to
* * * * * * * * * * 0
O H H H H HH H C=1 C) H H tray V V V N
sti
70 Z ZZZZ z Z H .0 H Z C C CC CC 0 to
Z ZZZZ z z 70 C H 7C til ;n ;v ;i M
PI til Ell Ill III til Dl til 0 1--I r
,..3 o 99x999 to �' rco- 0 z til H
Cr 0 H H H c> < o
a 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 H Z - 9 Z co
to
Z to Ill t' to C) rG C7 rG H O F-)
1-3
to11 b PC VI 70 GI GI N I-.
Z R5 hi o F.
0 rrt r .<
0 x
'zi H
z
C)
'iy b Cl C C C C C O H t=1 t=1 C) H H b
H 70 H H H H H H b .0 .0 0 X z 70
Cil
O H H H H H H til
9 R7 H H H H H H C H H 0 0 0 0 rpiy
L., to H Hp3H H H H r X M '� C) CpC IA a
V) rG K 't r< rC rC H \ [II til '=y x MI t=7 Cn [II
C H to Cn til to to to C) C Z rz-3 toil 70 Ili Cr,C0 0
i5 NN Cr)0 'z-3 H Z H
Cil Z Ill til C- til til til MI
''3 tZ a'' C C C C C C Cl) H Cn N r • y
H H H H H H 'Ll to H H Q+ ,-0
'il to C) C) C) C) 0 C) 'v r-3 Z Z 9 to H
ro C rn t=1 . til til til r t+l H H r 'C t O
rCT) C)) Z Z Co CO C z
H to til 9 9 77 r H
C) Z Z H C) C)
rn 0 C) C) hl
.O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 .O .O O , 9
w 4, W H W H CT H O. A CT H 00 V 1' W C)
Na H H CO Na Na CO N to .A r H
Na H H Na F. H H CO U' 0 O N H
H H H H w 0 0 H H p
0
i I i , i , , i i i i C
4- 1, .t' 4- 4 4, 4, 4, r 4 A A 4- Na H A r Z
CT W W W W W W W N W N Na N Na O. Vt W r 1-3
N H Co Co CO CO CO CO H w 4, 4- Na H CO w H
O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N 0 O 0 0 4*
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 .D .D 0 H 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .O .D 0 0 0 0 0 H
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 W W 0 Naw 0 0 0 Z
4, A 4' A A 4, 4- A V F. 1' 4 4 C
Ln V+ V+ V+ U' V+ V+ V+ V+ V+ V+ V 4- 4- 1 • 0
O. 4- W CJ W W W W Na H 0 .D .D CO H
C)
til
hi
0
z
C
C.-:-
CC-:-.
z
H H H H H H H H H H H H 0 r
H H H H
I-0 b hi ~c -.7: hib 'n hi hi hi 'e hiry 'c hc 9
r
•
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0
r r r r r r r r r . ' Cil C
r r r r r r r r r r 0 Z
v v v J V J v v v v x' 0
L,,) w N N N N N N N N.) H
r 0 •0 CO J O. VI r w N ZZ r
0
rrrrrr rrr r r r r r-. rr r r 0 x
.o .0 .D .D '0 .0 .O 'D .D 'D .0 •D '0 '0 'D •0 '0 '0 Z Cil
.o .D '0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .o '0 '0 .0 .o .C) Ci) 0
✓ rrrrr r -Ps r r r r r r -4' -4" r r CD N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .v
✓ rrrrr rrr r r r r r rr r r C7 Ci)
\\\\\\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ a 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H
rrrrrr rrr r r r r r ?-• l•-• r r Cil H
Cxi
0
x
VI
N N tq t/) t/) <I) t/)<I) <I) <I) 0
0-3
H F. U) w r 1 ' H H
to • to -COto- to to v)
t/) tp - N tp r w w H H 0.. v)v) W W 10 r r to to w w N
v) r to v) r N w O. w r 0D Oo V+ VI 0 0 r H H H .0 1/40 .0 w w .0 '0 V+ Z C7
✓ NNv 0 N OD0 -) H V1 V+ t-. I--. 00 UI V+ H H Cv .ow V+ VI 01/4 a% 0 0 n
In H 0 r 01/4 N 0) 0 00 0 w w r r 0 0 00 0o v v •0 r r 0 0 0 0 0 Z
O."0 r N 0 w 0 0 0 0 N N CO OD 0 0 V+ Vt 0 0 w .0 r O' O. 0 0 -0 H w0
* * * * * * * Y+
H
C U) U) U) n1 ;h :hPO .b ro 'O ro 0 00ZZn 0 �
VI
Vha w
r i Zk HH
rorororororo tz1 [xi txl ro N N mi � "h < 0
Cr1CrlCItil cx3cxl rrr U) M
Cil Cil [if Cil Cil Cil 0 0 0 Z V) H 7 O O Crl) Z •-
'-3 H H C7 f/) = 0 C ti) V) 0
O
UU) C) x
N
HHHHHH H H H U/) 0 d 0 �
0 n cHH
P.< 1• 4 ►C 1-4 rC P.< PI VI
H
H U 114JN f/ )
0 0 0 0 0 0 V 0
f�7 ')h 'xi ')h '�i 'r1 0
0 0 0 O O O MI CO CO 0 rd J-3CO y 0 0
rorororororo CCC 'zf .0 %C
1-3
Cil Ci) Cif Cif Ci) Cif H H H Ci) C O H Cii O H 0
C7 C 0 H
ro U) U) dpi H r
P> '11H
H HHH H H H H H H r H H M '-3 0 CCI
H H H H H H Z 'Z Z H CT) V) \ Z H CrJ 'C 9 fn
ZZZZZZ 0 0 0 Z Z H C/) 0 Z Z
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 '-3 Cl) Com') CZI
)
N • 0 tr
'� Cr) H
H H
V1 C/) O C/) V) CC/) 0 Z
35 H Z
C CCC C C H H H C r' H '-0 Z ''d H 'T) H
'V ro ro b ro ro y y r Cr) -3 y ro 0 0
rrrrrr Cti1 Z H a z
H H H H H HPC1 0)
Cil Ci) Cif Ci) C-7 Cif V H C0i1 V Cr'7
V) V) V) Cn V) V)
Cr)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ON .0 O 0 0 0' 0 .0 0>
.0r4LHH rwr r h) r r H H N r Oo 0
r VI r r' O. '0 m r r N) H N h) CO 01 H v r0 0
H H H H H H N H r H N 0 H H H N 0
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
✓ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N Z
N N N N N N N N N Com) Vt w W C.) N LID w N '-3
✓ rrrrr www H til H w w HV1 CO 0H
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r0 H
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 Z
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 V' 0
r rrr r r 0 0 r H 0' 0' m vi UI as v, r
Cr. Cr. O. O. O\ O. O. Q\ 0\ H CJ H 0 '0 CO W v H
r r r r r r w w w 0
Cif
My
0
z
g
•
'0
Cs
C)
z
C v+
H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H ..0 r
'0 d 'Oro rororo IV ha )-0 't7 'v 'a 'c 'v
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O x 0
2, r r r r r r r .1, 4, tx3 a
r . r 4- r r 4- 4- r r C) z
V V V V V V V V V V x C)
A w w w w w w w ta H
F-' 0 .o C) V a. V+ � w N Z t-'
0
C)
I- r H H r H H H H H H H H H H H H H 0 x
.O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .O .o .O .O x tri
.o .o .o .O .O .O .O .O .o .o .D .0 .D .O .o .o .O .o Cr7 C)
4, 4' r 4- r r 4, 4, r4- r r r .r` rrrr` 0 N
�� - - �.......�- - - ��.� x
0 0 00 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0000 po
H H H H r HHHH HH H H HHHH C7 Cr'
�� - ���� � -S '��� a C)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H
H r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r ri Co
H
C7
0 z,
M
<A N <n <n H <nv> 0 H
H N W a0 o 4. - x
<n v> <n-co -Cl) -c) <n v) «> <n <n
N H H H H <n N <n <n <n V U+ O. N W N N H r V+ V+ 0 0 V) <n
CO H H CT N W 0) CO CO CO U+ CO H H CA r r W Ca r r N N CT <I) H <I) X 0
W a% O. W .O r 0 0 W W W ON r r a' W W V7 V7 Cr, O. 0 0 W -Cl) W N .O 0 CD
L.) 0 0 V (Ti H Cn a. as a. V w r r w w .O N 0) 0 Ln 0 0 0 0 O N U' Z n
Ca' 00 H VI O. NN -P• 4, CO V W H V 00 00 H CO CO roar W-Ui H (....3
* * * * * * * * * O
H
C C Cn fn Cl) Cl) En V) V) Cn Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) CnCn V) V) .O
Z C C H H "11 hi '11 1110 0 Z M x .o
0 `� `� H Z ZZZZ x 0-3 x '� a
hi H 0 O C) C7 O [ ' 'V IV 'V '13O x z Co v) cn
tri
Eli Z 'r7 tri C' Cr1 Irl < 0
Cl) Cl) tri Cr' Cr' 0 H H H H Cl) Cl) H Cr1 Cr1 Cr' Cr' Cr' OD
H PV X 7:1 Cr' Ill Cr' Cr1 Crl H H H :h - - - - Z
z HH •cn � dcidv 0 Cr' r7 w
- cn
t• Cl) a s HHHH C: C O Cr) HHHH ,) N
M CH Hr7 00 0000 C HZZ N p H H H H H
H Py x .t >C .G >C H
P3o 0 n
0 Z H ro
Cl)
H a
z a
0 C-'
0 ro M C11 0 '-3 ro ro "ID ro ro ro 0 CI iv cn 0 0
Cri C/) H C; CII a 0 0 0 0 H 0 Cror) C COn Cron' C11:1
r1 tri
IA
a :aro a' 'T1 171
[r' m [r7 Z
[xi H
ro 1-3 H
a > a
H 0 Z H C'' N V) N Ch H Cl) H Z 0 a H H 0
H Cr' 'r' C7 H \ CO V) V) Cn Z CO H CII CI t'' H H C1
Z C Z Z Cl) H H H H 0 H Z Z Z Z Cl)
O Cr' H 0 C 0 0 0 0 \ 0 0 H a C) c) C)
N
C H N Cl)a ,ZZZZ 17:1Z C) H
C aaaa C Cl)fn En,T1 f? H a Cl) rrrr a' r C CnC: a .-Es
'b Z 'a H C) cnNCn H Cn ' V) roro H
C• r H t" tr1 Cr' Ca Cr' Cr' Cl) CII r CZr1 H H Z
H C:
H Cr' H Z ;a r 73 73x ;a H
CM 03 Z Cr1 C) C C C C H C Cr1 z � �
'1 a Cl) Cr' HHHH Z H Cl) 1-3
H Z 0 0 0 0 C') C)
0 0 Cr1 C7 C71 C7 CII .a
O o 0 0 0 0 a. ON .O a` 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 a
W W W W W W V+ a. W O. a, r r W H 0 H H 0
r H H H H H .O H N 0 r N) r N W a. -4 H C)
N H N N r H a. WNH H V+ r H HHNH 0
I I I I
I I i i i I I I I i I i I C
r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r w r r Z
N W N N N W tJ W (a 4> W W N V+ W a. N N H
H N Nr H w HHHH V+ H H ln NHHH
0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0
N 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 H
V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 0 0 0 0 Z
NO r r r r r r r r r r w r r r r r r <
a. V V V V a` ON a, ON ON Cr, ON 0' Cr, ON a\ ON 0
rn N H H 0 .o CO 00 CO 0) V rn V+ r r r r H
C)
Cr1
ro
0
z
C
z
'v
C)
z
CH H H H H H HH H H H H H a.tiy 'a ,0 ,13 '13 ^: ro -croro "V .11 "v .11 ro 'c 'a .ti t•-•'
n n
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0
4, r r r r r r r r r r t) 0
r r r r r r r r r r r n Z
�1 v -.1 _ �1 -_1 -1 J v . x n
V+ V+ V+ V+ r .- r r r .' r H
ut W N 03 J a. In A W
N Z r
0
n
r r H H r H H H H H H H H H H H n x
.0 .0 .0 .0 1/40 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 x CT)
1/40 1/40 1/40 .0 .0 1/40 1/40 1/40 •0 1/40 1/40 .0 .0 .0 •0 1/40 t=) Cl
W W W W (..... 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, r .f 4, 4, 4,.4, C) x
\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ x
H H H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pci
N N N N N H H H H H H HHHHH C7 Cr,
\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ 9 G)
N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-3 H
.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 H r H H H HHHHH t=) H
t1)
0 7d
x
<A </)</D til
N H H V>V) V> V) V> -CO -CO C) 1-3
N H H r H
rn rn H HH x
- - - - - . v> <o v> vto
>to - - to • - v>
tooto <o v> - 0
I-. r CO N a. V+ V+ In V+ r <I) N '0 •0 1 4, w W . . v {I> V> N H H N
F 4, N H H N) N O O J 00 0o V+ In v v W W N N W CO .L O. .0 .1 03 0
W W N 0 H 1/40 1/40 00 CO O+ 00 CO 1/40 1/40 0 0 N N N N J-. J v a. N H W 0 CD
C C)
03 03 VI J 00 -s 4- 03 03 H 0 0 0 0 0 O a. a. W (..3 .0 r W 0) N r W Z
•V+ In 03 .P a. a. W CO H V+ a. 0 0 0 0 .0 .0 J -1 W N .L O a. r -W .3 Wo
* * * * * * * * * *
r
Z x a c H c o00Ca 1/40
'0
9 C7 'Z) H H 9 ro H 9 ZZZZZ •0
,� rr to to to r HHHHH 4>
C) H9 H til H 0 Cr1 O O O O O
1-3 t-3 Z `VI V 0 U Cl) ib is 7c 7d al oa
0
U) � 10 VI.< to Z C 10 t) CI to t)f to Z --
tntn 9 Z 0 ZZZZZ 0 W
CO W H H0 r P:1 H H H 3 p-3 0 N
tz, tz, ts, 1-1 1-9 99999 7d F,
7N rr H cn rrrrr
Z •3to to U) a)
r+7 tr1 al C.1 t)
1-3 d iv '� 7v 7d 7v
,...1z C C C C C
O O 0 HHHHH
roro ZZZZZ
tri t) 0 0 0 n n
O •,ri ,TI t)f n 0 0 0 C o O to to 0 0 0
N H H .0 9 P-0 10 1-3 1-3 hi ro 00 'v101•0
.0 n H 0 Z tr) L=7 H H tzi U H H [+7 ttr11 t)
H \ b b t11 H H C7 C7 9 9
Z9 Z 7d HH ►3 H H H HHHHH t7
t1) rt; t=) H H ►C 'C H H Z Z H H H til
cH') r H Z 00 to v> C) Z " c) 000 0
til N Cn to V> t/) H
C C C C C H H C C C 10
tz) b hi hi H H b b Z Z 'd b b P-3
9 .-0 1-0 0 n ro "'Cl HHro 'd 'v HH
'd > H H H H H H H Z
1-4 CO til rx1 a t-' N V) C17 to V) C0 t0
C.0 to to N
Cv t=)
r
.0 .0 .0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
CoODH a. H r r H cr. a. W � 4, a 4 n
H H H 4, r A N CO r � r H N N N r n
0 0 0 H 0 H H H W H H HHHHH 0
I 11 I I I I I I I I mil 0
H H H 1 H .L N A •L
r r r r r r r Z
H H H In H N N W W N N N N N N N H
-1 -1 J V+ �1 H H CO CO H H W W H H H
J t+> H 0 -J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #
O H H N 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 CO CO W 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H
0 H H -1 0 0 0 1/40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z
4- a. r 4 r 0) 4, 4: r 4- 4. 4` 4, 4, C
03 v+ v v v Ln v v v v v v J J 0
O .0 CO 00 0) -1 a. V+ -P. - - H
t=)
'd
0
z
c
z
'd
67,
tro
Z
C �1
H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 9
b b 'd b 'd 'd 'd ro 'd ro '0 'o ro ro 'd '^.. r
0 0
V V V V 7C C)
VI LSI VI VI H
.O 0) 4 Cr Z t"
O
0
r r r r 0 x
.O .O .O .O x [TJ
.o .o .o .O to 0
x Pq
I-' H r H 77
N N N.) N C7 t+1
N N.) N.) N.) H H
.O .O .O .O C71 G)
H
tO
0 73
<A x
N in V) it, L) L=)
ON to <n <n to r r r r c) H
r N N .t 1, In V+ r r 7C
0
rr .o .o ww rnrn
L.) 4,1 43 ON Cr, ON ON .' tom C
r r 4 -4 N N o 0 0 m
• • • • • • c C)
L., Lo L...) NN 00 .0 .0 Z
•
w r r as 0' 0 o r-r H w
* * * * 0
r
C C C/) b •o
(/) C/) '0 .D
x M CC) tri w
7y
C7 C7
t1 � a < co
z w
H H 0 N
z z 70 ••
G) O r
r
P1:- a
C) o
C) C)
0 0
� C
z z
H H
N N " -)
L.) C.) H V+
P-' Cl)
r 0 c) CO
Cil I
0 r 0 C7
to
0 )
C/)
Z CI
CI
0 H
C '0
C/) H
H
0
Z
kb s.0 '0 .a >
03 CO 0 CO 0
I-. r 0 r C)
0 0 r 0 0
I I I I
N N w N Z
H r ON r H
-.) -I N CO
CO CO 0 w #
r r 0 r
CO CO 0 CO H
I-. r 0 r Z
r c
CO 0
r H
0
t=)
'0
0
Z
R
.ti
Cl
• CD
O
z
c co
HH H ..
'v 'o 'v -...._ r
'=J '71 P] 17i j K7 'z] '=7 'z7 '17 '=7 Px1 'z7 C)
C C C c C C c C C C c C c o
z z z z z z az z z z z z z C
ti Cy Cy C1 et Cy z 0 Cy e) C7 t7 C7 C) z
C7 0
* * k * t 4k * * * * * * * H
* r
0
.o 00 0, V .L- . r . w w r I- 0 x
.D 1- r W W W A N N t.) 0 I- r 0 t4
0 0 0 0 V a. N r 0 N w V+ . r c)
.0 x
t/ t=f b Cl) r r C) ro r r x H C) to
t=7 Cl) a 0 .0 .0 r a . .D ;ut-xl
►ji n .0 0 •o •a 01/4 b .o0 Z CD 9 z
c0 0 `'� 1/40 he c a
H tr-' C M M 770 ro tt 1 0 H H t-. i-C
b b H ;u V) 0 Z
0 0 0 C 'Pi H 7o C H
Cl) D Cr] t 1 [=1 171 < C7
H 0=7 ttI ttx C C
t "17 W t7
Z Z Z e) tl a>
H H 0 '=J n
H
La
0
H
.0
N t!) iC N <la {A N W
C. V+ 4, N <I) i/) V) r to h-' to In
r .- V+ .0 co W W O. W Q
O • 0
r. _ _ _ _
V Vt W V Q. .O - V 0 .O lJ+ . 0
W .O N r r N .O N 0 1--. to v) . 0 Co
V -CO 0 O. N .- .t O. .O 0 r W N W 1/40 ••
• CO . - W
W 0 V CO 1/40 CO .O • N 0 W 0 N W 07 N
w 0 0 V 0 w 0 CO 0 r r w CO 0)
0 w
ro
w
Go
cD
r
MEMO TO: Shakopee City Council
FROM: Gary Laurent, Mayor
RE: 1994 Liaison/Related Appointments
DATE: December 29, 1993
Consistent with past Council practices I'm hereby making the
following recommendations for appointments for 1994 :
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission Liaison - Bob Sweeney
Murphy's Landing Liaison - Joan Lynch
Independent School District #720 Liaison - Kris Dirks
Scott County Board of Commissioners Liaison - Bob Sweeney
Shakopee Clubs and the Shakopee Coalition - Kris Dirks
Shakopee Convention and Visitors Bureau - Mike Beard
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) - Joan Lynch
Alternate to AMM - Kris Dirks
Suburban Rate Authority - Mike Beard
Suburban Rate Authority Alternate - Bob Sweeney
Vice Mayor, City of Shakopee - Mike Beard
I would appreciate the City Council endorsing the above mentioned
appointments.
The Suburban Rate Authority specifically requires a resolution for
the appointment of both the Director and Alternate Director from
the City of Shakopee. Therefore a resolution is attached to this
memo.
While the Mayor does not have the authority to appoint the Chair of
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, I would like to recommend
that Joan Lynch be elected to that position by the members of the
HRA.
ACTION REQUESTED:
1) Move to approve the appointments as above mentioned.
2) Move to adopt Resolution No. 3934 , a resolution designating a
Director and Alternate Director to the Suburban Rate
Authority.
RESOLUTION NO. 3934
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE
DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota as follows:
Mike Beard is hereby designated to serve as a Director of
the Suburban Rate Authority and Bob Sweeney is hereby
designated to serve as the Alternate Director of the Suburban Rate
Authority for the year 1994 and until their successors are
appointed.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
1993.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
JNSEN1�
/\5A1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Shakopee Senior Graduation Party, Inc.
DATE: December 30, 1993
INTRODUCTION:
The Shakopee Senior Graduation Party, Inc. is asking the City
Council to waive the City's 30 day review period for their
application for an exemption from obtaining a gambling license.
BACKGROUND:
The Shakopee Senior Graduation Party, Inc. desires to obtain
authorization for exemption from lawful gambling license from the
State Gambling Control Board. Prior to granting such an exemption
status, the municipality in which the activity is to be conducted,
has 30 days in which to request denial by the Gambling Control
Board. The Shakopee Senior Graduation Party, Inc. can not wait for
30 days to pass because their raffle is scheduled for February 18th
and they need to receive the exemption so that they can start
selling raffle tickets.
The Shakopee Senior Graduation Party, Inc. will certainly be
complying with the city code which requires that 75% of its
expenditures for lawful purposes be spent on lawful purposes
conducted or located within the city's trade area.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Move to waive the 30 day review period for the Shakopee Senior
Graduation Party, Inc. 's application for authorization for
exemption from lawful gambling license and approve said
application.
Minnesota Lawful Gambling FOR BOARD USE ONLY
CHK
LG2zo Application for Authorization for NIT DATE
^`v 42-'93' Exemption from Lawful Gambling License
F711 in the unshaded portions of this application for exemption and
send it in at least 45 days before your gambling activity for processing.
Name and Address of Organization / 1
Organization Name Currentprevious license number Currentprevtous exempt number
' t i l.., '"1:.•_o_. I •Ci - 33`<
J��t- -.�1=t- �:iU tr' ��;(ix,.�.t(cz.ti�:,‘ s t 1--iti+; {' -' I `s
Street City State Zp code I County
gI1a r=CL. (lt{ti Tick,' S -\u±---e+'A 1-»05 37'.1 .�Cc
Chief Executive Officer Daytime Phone Number Treasurer Daytime Phone Number
q,,{\(_,\ L .,'.T..-qtr- cu ) (-19(, l Jtc,-- i t-r,(_ _i t_Tct.t.(- ((ah) cist(4-lso5"
Type of Non-profit Organization
'Check the box that indicates your proof of nonprofit
Check the box below which indicates your type of organization status and attach a copy of the proof to the application.
❑ Fraternal ❑ IRS designation CA 6 (i • 1(•(" ivi k a .lam
❑ Veterans ❑ Certification of good standing from the Minnesota LY e;,,t,,{-
❑ Religious Secretary of State's office (/A._. 'l f.,:. v a ;-f-
gOther non-profit ❑ Affiliate of parent nonprofit organization(charter)
Gambling Site
Name of ste were aciivity will take place
3Kat e. 5l` k ►i5c -a
Street City Township Stale Zip code County
10 tit, fLr Lew,i J �i--) !�y� MN 6S311 Sr o-H—
Dale(s)of activity(for raffles,indicate the date of the drawing)
fi&9J4 i gl 0914
Types of Games Financial Report Market Value of Prizes
Expanses,Includ=.ng (Including Donations
Game(s) Gross Receipts Cost of Prizes Nat Profit-. and cash)
Bingo ❑
Raffles
Paddlewheels ❑
Tipboards ❑
Pull-tabs ❑ I' ._
I declare all information submitted to the Distrbutor from whom gambiing equipment was purchased
Gambling Control Board is true, accurate, Dstrbutors license number :.
and complete.
!declare all financial information submitted to the Gambling Control
Board Is true,accurate,and complete.-_
Lvti l..-f 3_`13 1t1 r ,i/1 I -13-93
Chief Ex cutiv Officer's ignaturl Date `Chief Exec ve Officer'sAlgnatu a Date
Local Unit of Governs t Acknowledgment
I have received a copy of this application. This application will be reviewed by the Gambling Control Board and will become effective 30 days from the date of
receipt by the city or county,unless thelocal unit of government passes a resolution to specifically prohibit the activity. A copy of that resolution must be received
by the Gambling Control Board within 30 days of the date tilled In below. Cities of the first Bass have 60 days in which to disallow the activity.
City or County Township Township is
City of courtly name Township name ❑organized
` IAA,
Q2 ❑ unorganized'
Si ure ers n receiving apolic n� Signature of person receiving application ❑ unincorporated'
✓ L )• / 3 3 *Attach letter
Title I
Dale received Title Dale Received
_ V (IL
This form vbe made available Mail with $25 permit fee and copy of White Original
in alternative format(i.e. large proof of nonprofit status to: Yellow-Board returns to
print,braille)upon request. Gambling Control Board Organization to complete
1711 W. County Rd. B, Ste. 300 S. shaded areas
Roseville, MN 55113
OkSEN1
/6e
�6b
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Apportionment of Special Assessments
DATE: December 30, 1993
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
As a result of the subdivision of land into The Meadows 9th
Addition and into Milwaukee Manor First Addition, existing special
assessments need to be reapportioned into the newly described lots.
Attached for City Council consideration are two resolutions which
will accomplish these apportionments.
Mr. Fleck has agreed to the apportionment in his developers
agreement for The Meadows 9th Addition.
Mr. Menke's developers agreement did not include the
reapportionment because the assessments were levied after his plat
was recorded (October 29, 1993) . He has been sent a copy of the
proposed apportionment. He has a right to question the manner in
which the apportionment was done, if he cares to do so.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Offer Resolution No. 3932 , A Resolution Apportioning
Assessments Among New Parcels Created As A Result of Platting of
The Meadows 9th Addition, and move its adoption.
2 . Offer Resolution No. 3931, A Resolution Apportioning
Assessments Among New Parcels Created As A Result of Platting of
Milwaukee Manor First Addition, and move its adoption.
RESOLUTION NO. 3931
A RESOLUTION APPORTIONING ASSESSMENTS AMONG NEW PARCELS
CREATED AS A RESULT OF PLATTING OF MILWAUKEE MANOR FIRST ADDITION
WHEREAS, on November 3, 1993, Resolution No. 3890 adopted by
the City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted
by construction of the alley between Market Street and Outlot A of
Eastview Addition and Minnesota Street/Dakota Street from 7th
Avenue North to the Alley, Project No. 1993-5; and
WHEREAS, four lots assessed for said improvements have been
re-platted into Milwaukee Manor First Addition and are identified
as Lot 6, Block 309, PID #27-008018-0, Lots 6 and 7 Block 314 PID
#27-008062-0 and 27-008063-0, and Lot 4, Block 317, PID #27-008067-
0; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to apportion the
installments remaining unpaid against said four lots because of the
platting of Milwaukee Manor First Addition; and
WHEREAS, the property owners have been advised of the proposed
apportionment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, That the 1993 payable remaining balance of
assessments to parcel 27-008018-0 in the amount of $1, 386. 37, to
parcel 27-008062-0 in the amount of $1,386. 37, to parcel 27-008063-
0 in the amount of $1, 387.37, and to parcel 27-008067 in the amount
of $1,755.74 for the 1993-5 improvements are hereby apportioned as
outlined in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all other parts of Resolution
Number 3890 shall continue in effect.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 4th day of January, 1994 .
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form , City Attorney
EXHIBIT "A" to Resolution No. 3931
Assessment Reapportionment for P.I.D. 27-008018-0,
27-008062-0, 27-008063-0, 27-008067-0
December 20, 1993
LEGAL 1993-5
P.I.D. NO. OWNER DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT
27-179039-0 Leroy R & Darlene Menke Outlot G $1,386.37
1185 S. Shumway St. Milwaukee Manor
Shakopee, Mn. 55379 First Addition
27-179040-0 Leroy R & Darlene Menke Outlot H $2,772.74
1185 S. Shumway St. Milwaukee Manor
Shakopee, Mn. 55379 First Addition
27-179041-0 Leroy R & Darlene Menke Outlot I $1,755.74
1185 S. Shumway St. Milwaukee Manor
Shakopee, Mn. 55379 First Addition
Total = $5,914.85
RESOLUTION NO. 3932
A RESOLUTION APPORTIONING ASSESSMENTS AMONG NEW PARCELS
CREATED AS A RESULT OF PLATTING OF THE MEADOWS 9TH ADDITION
WHEREAS, on August 25, 1981, Resolution No. 1891 adopted by
the City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted
by construction of the 1981-1 V.I.P. Interceptor; and
WHEREAS, on September 20, 1988, Resolution No. 2946 adopted by
the City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted
by construction of the Valley Industrial Park Sewer Extension from
the West side of County Road 17 to the East side of County Road 79,
Project No. 1987-13; and
WHEREAS, on October 18, 1988, Resolution No. 2974 adopted by
the City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid
against the parcels created because of the platting of The Meadows
1st Addition; and
WHEREAS, on October 3, 1989, Resolution No. 3121 adopted by
the City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid
against the parcels created because of the platting of The Meadows
2nd Addition; and
WHEREAS, part of Outlots B and E of The Meadows 1st Addition
and Outlots A and D of The Meadows 2nd Addition have been
subdivided into the plat of The Meadows 4th Addition; and
WHEREAS, on June 5, 1990, Resolution No. 3237 adopted by the
City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid against
the parcels created because of the platting of The Meadows 4th
Addition; and
WHEREAS, the balance of Outlot E of The Meadows 1st Addition
has been subdivided into the plat of The Meadows 5th Addition; and
WHEREAS, on August 6, 1991, Resolution No. 3437 adopted by the
City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid against
the parcels created because of the platting of The Meadows 5th
Addition; and
WHEREAS, Outlot C, The Meadows 4th Addition and Outlots B & C,
The Meadows 5th Addition have been subdivided into the plat of The
Meadows 6th Addition; and
WHEREAS, on November 19, 1991, Resolution No. 3494 adopted by
the City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid
against the parcels created because of the platting of The Meadows
6th Addition; and
Resolution No. 3932
Page -2-
WHEREAS, Outlot A, The Meadows 3rd Addition, Outlot B, The
Meadows 1st Addition, and Outlot B, The Meadows 6th Addition have
been subdivided into the plat of The Meadows 7th Addition; and
WHEREAS, on August 18th, 1992, Resolution No. 3644 adopted by
the City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid
against the parcels created because of the platting of The Meadows
7th Addition; and
WHEREAS, on November 17, 1992, Resolution No. 3705 adopted by
the City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted
by construction of the Vierling Drive roadway improvements from CR-
17 to CR-79 , Project No. 1992-3 ; and
WHEREAS, Outlot A, The Meadows 7th Addition has been
subdivided into the plat of The Meadows 8th Addition; and
WHEREAS, on March 2 , 1993 , Resolution No. 3750 adopted by the
City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid against
the parcels creeated because of the platting of The Meadows 8th
Addition; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to apportion the
installments remaining unpaid against Outlot A, The Meadows 8th
Addition and part of Outlot A, The Meadows 1st Addition because of
the platting of The Meadows 9th Addition; and
WHEREAS, the property owners have agreed to the apportionment
through the execution of a developers agreement for The Meadows 9th
Addition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA That the 1993 payable remaining balance of
assessments to parcel 27-136-054-0 in the amount of $706.70
for the 1981-1 V.I.P. Interceptor, $4,277.91 for the 1987-13 V.I.P.
Sanitary Sewer Extension, and $0 for the 1992-3 Vierling Drive
Roadway Improvements; and the 1993 payable remaining balance of "
assessments to parcel 27-173-053-0 in the amount of $1, 565.91 for
the 1981-1 V. I.P. Interceptor, $9,477.97 for the 1987-13 V.I.P.
Sanitary Sewer Extension, and $62,758.54 for the 1992-3 Vierling
Drive Roadway Improvements are hereby apportioned as outlined in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all other parts of Resolution
Numbers 1891, 2946, 2974, 3121, 3237, 3437, 3494, 3644, 3705 and
3750 shall continue in effect.
Resolution No. 3932
Page -3-
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 4th day of January, 1994.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form , City Attorney
EXHIBIT "A" to Res . No. 3932 Page 1 of 3
Assessment Reapportionment for Meadows 9th Addition
November 2, 1993
December 22, 1993
P.I.D. NO. OWNER LEGAL 1981-1 1987-3 1992-3
DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
27-136054-0 WETTERLIN DEV. OUTLOT A EX. HWY. $608.53 $4,119.49 $0.00
6609 DAKOTA TRAIL MEADOWS 1ST
EDINA, MN. 55435 ADDITION
27-180001-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 1 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 554-45 ADDITION
27-180002-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 2 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180003-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 3 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180004-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 4 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180005-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 5 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDMON
27-180006-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 6 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180007-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 7 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDmON
27-180008-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 8 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDMON
27-180009-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 9 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDmON
27-180010-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 10 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION
27-1809011-O GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 11 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180012-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 12 BLOCK 1 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDmON
27-180013-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 1 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180014-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 2 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180015-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 3 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDmON
Page 2 of 5
Assessment Reapportionment for Meadows 9th Addition
November 2, 1993
December 22, 1993
P.I.D. NO. OWNER LEGAL 1981-1 1987-3 1992-3
DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
27-1800016-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 4 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180017-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 5 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180018-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 6 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180019-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 7 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180020-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 8 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180021-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 9 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180022-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 10 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180023-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 11 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180024-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 12 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180025-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 13 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180026-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 14 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180027-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 15 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180028-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 16 BLOCK 2 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180029-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 1 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180030-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 2 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180031-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 3 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION
Page 3 of 3
Assessment Reapportionment for Meadows 9th Addition
November 2, 1993
December 22, 1993
P.I.D. NO. OWNER LEGAL 1981-1 1987-3 1992-3
DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
27-180032-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 4 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
IBROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180033-0 (GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 5 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180034-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 6 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180035-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 7 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180036-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 8 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180037-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 9 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180038-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 10 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180039-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 11 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180040-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 12 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITON
27-180041-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 13 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDmON
27-180042-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 14 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180043-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 15 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180044-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 16 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180045-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 17 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180046-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 18 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180047-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 19 BLOCK 3 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDmON
Page 4 of 3
Assessment Reapportionment for Meadows 9th Addition
November 2, 1993
December 22, 1993
P.I.D. NO. OWNER LEGAL 1981-1 1987-3 1992-3
DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
27-180048-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 1 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 5936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180049-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 2 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180050-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 3 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180051-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 4 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 S936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180052-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 5 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180053-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 6 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180054-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 7 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDMON
27-180055-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 8 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180056-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 9 BLOCK 4 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180057-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 1 BLOCK 5 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180058-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 2 BLOCK 5 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180059-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 3 BLOCK 5 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
- BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180060-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 4 BLOCK 5 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK,MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180061-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 5 BLOCK 5 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9T1-1
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDm0N
27-180062-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 6 BLOCK 5 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN.55445 ADDITION
27-180063-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 7 BLOCK 5 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDmON
Page 3 of 3
Assessment Reapportionment for Meadows 9th Addition
November 2, 1993
December 22, 1993
P.I.D. NO. OWNER LEGAL 1981-1 1987-3 1992-3
DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
27-180064-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 1 BLOCK 6 $23.92 $143.61 $936.45
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180065-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 2 BLOCK 6 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180066-0 GOLD NUGGET DEV. LOT 3 BLOCK 6 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
27-180067-0 GOLD NUGGET CEV. LOT 4 BLOCK 6 $23.76 $143.83 $936.70
8857 ZEALAND AVE. NO. MEADOWS 9TH
BROOKLYN PARK, MN. 55445 ADDITION
TOTALS= $2,200.61 $13,755.88 $62,758.65
CONSENT ) 6c
TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Resolution No. 3935 Related to 4M Fund Proxy
DATE: December 29, 1993
Introduction
The membership of the Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund will be voting on
changes in the operation of the fund. This resolution designates person to
execute the vote.
Background
A portion of the City's funds are invested in the Minnesota Municipal Money
Market Fund. The Council previously authorized participation in the fund.
The Board of Trustees is recommending that three changes be made in the operation
of the fund; 1.) authorization to offer additional investment options, 2.)
authorization to use slightly longer maturities in the basic fund, and 3.)
authorize the use of reverse repurchase agreements by the portfolio manager.
Implementing the changes requires an amendment of the Declaration of Trust which
requires a vote of the membership.
The attached resolution, if adopted, would designate myself to vote on the
changes on behalf of the city and to execute the proxy. This authorization is
valid for only one time which is the issues to be voted on at the 2/2/94 meeting.
Failure to adopt the resolution would result in no affirmative vote being
submitted by the City.
Staff has a copy of all the documents related to this issue.
Alternatives
1. Do not vote.
2. Designate the Finance Director.
3. Designate some other person.
Recommendation
Alternative number 2.
Action
Offer Resolution No. 3935 A Resolution Authorizing Execution of Proxy in Favor
Of Certain amendments to The Declaration Of Trust Of The Minnesota Municipal
Money Market Fund, and move its adoption.
RESOLUTION NO. 3935
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF PROXY IN FAVOR OF CERTAIN
AMENDMENTS TO THE DECLARATION OF TRUST OF THE MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL MONEY MARKET FUND.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shakopee , Minnesota as follows:
Section 1. Background.
1. 01 The City of Shakopee is a participant in
the Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (4M Fund) , by reason
of its approval of a joint powers agreement in the form of a
Declaration of Trust.
1. 02 The City has been asked to consider certain amendments to
the Declaration of Trust of the 4M Fund.
1. 03 The City has reviewed and considered the proposed
amendments to the Declaration of Trust as described in the
attached proxy statement and amended Declaration of Trust.
Section 2 . Authorization
2. 01 The City of Shakopee approves the proposed
amendments described in the proxy statement and amended
Declaration of Trust.
2. 02 At a meeting of the 4M Fund participants to be held on
February 2, 1994, Gregg Voxland is authorized to
attend and vote on behalf of the city in favor of the proposed
amendments, or in the alternative, is authorized to execute the
attached proxy in favor the amendments and forward it to the
proxy agent to be voted accordingly.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shakopee
Minnesota, on the day. of , 19_.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk Attorney
A.
Oi\1SENT
RESOLUTION NO. 3936
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, REQUESTING THE
USE OF A SCOTT COUNTY BUILDING FOR POLICE TRAINING.
WHEREAS, the Scott County Highway Department has taken
possession of the building located at the following address :
2006 County Road 18, in the City of Shakopee; and
WHEREAS, this building is scheduled for demolition in order
to make room for additional road construction; and
WHEREAS, the Shakopee Police Department would like to use
this building for police training purposes including stealth
entry, dynamic entry, room searches, officer down rescues, and
general team movement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee would assume all liability for
all claims for damage, actions or causes of action arising out of
negligent acts of the Police Department, its agents and
employees, hold the County of Scott harmless from any such
claims; and
WHEREAS, the County of Scott has tentatively agreed to the
use of this building for police training purposes subject to the
passage of this resolution.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Shakopee that the Shakopee Police Department is authorized to
arrange with the Scott County Highway Department for the use of
the premises at 2006 County Road 18, in Shakopee, Minnesota, for
training purposes .
Dated this day of 1994 .
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
Attest : City Clerk
Approved as to form: City Attorney
[BURNING.RES]