Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/11/1993 TENTATIVE AGENDA SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MAY 11, 1993 Mayor Gary Laurent presiding 1] Roll Call at 5: 30 P.M. 2] Approval of Minutes of April 27 , 1993 3] Rahr Malting Sewer System/Forcemain 43 Other business 5] Adjourn Dennis R. Kraft City Administrator OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APRIL 27, 1993 Mayor Gary Laurent called the meeting to order at 6 : 06 p.m. with Councilmembers Beard, Lynch, and Sweeney present . Councilwoman Vierling was absent . Also present : Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator; Karen Marty, City Attorney; Dave Hutton, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; Lou Van Hout, SPUC Manager; and Shakopee Public Utility Commissioners : Jim Cook, Chai�� Terry O'Toole, and Barry Kirchmeier. x� Shakopee Public Utilities Commission also called their meeting to order. Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve the minutes of March 23 , 1993 . Motion carried with Councilor Beard abstaining. Mr. Kraft asked that the following be added to the agenda: 2e) Issuance of Bonds by SPUC; 3a) Parking for Dance Contest May 1st; and 3b) Setting Committee of the Whole Meeting for May 11th at 5 :30 p.m. to Meet With Representatives From Rahr Malting. Mr. O'Toole asked that SPUC Reports (2f) be added to the agenda: 1) Upcoming Rate Topics, 2) Service Territory Acquisition, 3) Power Rate Contract, and 4) Miscellaneous Items . Mayor Laurent advised SPUC that the Council ordered the downtown alley and undergrounding overhead electric project at their April 20th meeting. Mr. Hutton explained that he and Mr. Van Hout will need to coordinate the design work for this project . Mr. Van Hout will be needed to do the electric design and Mr. Hutton will do the alley design. He also suggested that a Memorandum of Understanding be considered to address who pays for what parts of this project . Cncl . Sweeney stated that there will be a need to condemn properties for the transformers . He explained that he thought that Mr. Van Hout was suggesting that the City handle the acquisition process and the costs involved. Mr. O'Toole stated that SPUC has budgeted $100, 000 for undergrounding the overhead electric and that any overages would be of some concern. Mr. Van Hout concurred with Cncl . Sweeney, that the City absorb the acquisition costs and also decide where to locate the transformers based on possible sites identified by SPUC. He said that the City may already own some of the sites . He stated that he agrees with Mr. Hutton' s concept of a Memorandum of Understanding. He stated that he hoped it would be in the form of concepts of what each body thinks they should pay for because specific items can not be identified that closely. April 27, 1993 r Official Proceedings of the Aprage -2- Shakopee Committee of the Whole Mr. Van Hout stated that their engineer suggested that someone mandate that the downtown property owners who have 3-Phase 240 volt power change to 208V. He explained that if thereare twomeaorsa three people who wish to continue with the old system, that system in that block. Mr. Van Hout said that the engineer rss our ut of town, but that he is looking for some sugg estioflexibility from the engineer on this . Sweeney/Lynch moved to direct staff to prepare a memorandum of understanding for consideration at a City Council meeting on cost sharing for the undergrounding of the downtown overhead electric . Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Hutton reported on a recent meeting involving Ms . Marty, Mr. Van Hout and himself regarding the condemnation process fors r the sub-station on Marschall Road. After discussion, thereopposition among City Council and SPUC that Mr. Hutton be the lead staff person on the condemnation process . City Council wanted to be involved only where legal actions are required. Mr. Van Hout will be involved where there are specific electric questions dealing with the project . Mr. O'Toole stated that there is no problem with reimbursing the City for the condemnation costs based on the City Attorney' s memo (to be discussed later on during the meeting) . He also explained that there is a desire to start officially mapping sites for future sub-stations and water tanks, but that it is a slow process . Mr. O'Toole stated that SPUC is comfortable with Ms . Marty' s recommendation for reimbursement for providing legal services to Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. Sweeney/Lynch moved to direct staff to prepare an item for the next City Council agenda that incorporates the City Attorney' s recommendation to not charge SPUC for use of the City Attorney for routine matters, but do charge for larger projects (those which take more than two hours) and to continue to contract out specialized projects . Motion carried unanimously. Discussion followed on Sec. 3 .10, Subd. 8 of the City Code which requires any property abutting a public street or alley in which any sanitary sewer main or City water lines have been constructed to connect said when mains a private system water line within three (3) becomes defective years or immediately whichever occurs first . Sweeney/Beard moved to direct staff to prepare an amendment to insert the word "residential" into Sec. 3 . 10, Subd. 8 of the City Code. Motion carried unanimously. Official Proceedings of the April 27, 1993 Shakopee Committee of the Whole Page -3- City staff will continue to enforce Sec. 3 .10, Subd. 8 of the City Code as problems occur. Ms . Marty stated that she had been contacted by Mr. Tom Hay (the City' s bond counsel) who stated that he was not sure that SPUC could sell revenue bonds . He was having difficulty finding authority within the statutes for SPDC to issue bonds . He suggested that the City could adopt a resolution to issue the bonds and SPUC could adopt a resolution to be bound by the service debt of the bonds . Discussion followed. Cncl . Sweeney suggested waiting until SPUC receives an opinion in writing from Mr. Tom Hay. If it is determined that the City needs to sell the bonds, SPUC could then request the City to sell the bonds . Mr. O'Toole stated that the water rates were recently increased by 4% and that there was a modest increase last year. He said that it is necessary to look at increases in rates to build capital for operating expenses . He pointed out that these funds are used to improve defective water connections when the City puts in new watermains and that these costs are not assessed. Mr. O'Toole stated that SPUC will be looking at an increase in electric rates in the near future; there has been no increase since 1982 . Mr. O'Toole stated that the recent service acquisition was lengthy. He reminded City Council of SPUC' s annual 23 . 77% contribution to the City and that City Council agreed that it would not include the area affected by the acquisition until July, 1994 . Mr. O'Toole advised City Council that SPUC hired a new person this past year, Mr. Joe Adams; that they passed a recent water supply test for copper lead; and that they have received a certificate of compliance on comparable worth. Mr. Hutton stated that he would like to pave the parking lot around the public works building and the SPUC building and would like to put together cost estimates . He said that it should be done within the next year or two. Roughly the cost will be $150, 000 and would be 50% City/50% SPUC. Mr. O'Toole acknowledged that the City Council would like to receive funds from SPUC on a more regular basis . He said that the City would be hearing more on that . Cook/Kirchmeier moved to adjourn the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission at 7 : 25 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion ensued on a dance contest taking place at the Senior High on May 1st and 2nd and the current parking limits on the streets in the adjacent neighborhood. Official Proceedings of the April 27, 1993 Shakopee Committee of the Whole Page -4- Sweeney/Lynch directed staff to make adjustments to parking signs as appropriate for May 1st . Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kraft asked the City Council if they could be available for a Committee of the Whole meeting on May 11th at 5 :30 P.M. to meet with representatives from Rahr Malting. Mr. Hutton explained that City Council agreed previously to pay for the forcemain and that Rahr would install and maintain the lift station on their property. He said that they wished to discuss other alternatives . Mr. Kraft asked if City Council would be available to meet on June 9th at 5 :00 P.M. to award tax increment refunding bonds . Cncl . Lynch, Sweeney, and Beard said that they could be available. Mayor Laurent said that he could not be available. Mayor Laurent adjourned the meeting at 7 :45 P.M. 11, tx4ac\). 0/?(..-/ kith S. Cox y Clerk Recording Secretary MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Rahr Malting Sewer System/Forcemain DATE : May 7, 1993 For the past year the City and Rahr Malting have been investigating ways of providing for the handling of the sewage affluent to be discharged under the Shakopee sewer system from Malt House #5, which is currently under construction. The major problem is that the river trunk sewer, which handles the sewage outflow from Malt Houses #1-4, is at or near capacity during part of the year and therefore cannot handle the additional effluent generated by Malt House #5 . The City has been working with both Rahr Malting and the consulting firm of Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) in an attempt to formulate a solution to this problem. As presented to the City Council several months ago the solution arrived at was to install a lift station and construct a forcemain which would pump the effluent from Malt House #5 up the hill to the South of Rahr past the Minnesota Correctional Facility for Women and Sweeney School to the VIP Sewer. The VIP Sewer has the capacity to handle Malt House #5 . The City then agreed to construct the forcemain at a cost of plus or minus $300, 000 . 00 and Rahr was expected to construct and operate the lift station on their property for a cost of $150, 000 . 00 to $200, 000 . 00 . The later mentioned amount was just for the cost of constructing the facility and Rahr would subsequently experience a continuing cost for both energy and personnel needed to actually operate the lift station. As was explained to the City Council previously, the malting business is very competitive. Rahr operates at a financially competitive disadvantage because of being located in the State of Minnesota. The taxing and regulatory structures imposed by both State and Metropolitan agencies have resulted in costs which are higher than in other parts of the country. A couple of years ago Rahr spent a considerable amount of time and money in an attempt to provide for the construction and operation of their own sewage treatment plant . This plant would treat the effluent generated by Rahr and then discharge it directly into the Minnesota River, therefore bypassing the City system and the MWCC system and treatment plant at Blue Lake. This effort was thwarted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and other agencies. Rahr' s long term goal is still to construct and operate its own sewage treatment plant because they believe that by doing so they will exert a greater amount of control over their financial destiny and their position in the market place. Rahr has also continued to diligently pursue other means of lowering or containing their operating costs in order to continue to be a viable player in the malting industry. Rahr has recently retained the services of SEH to do additional analysis regarding methods of screening and discharging their process water (sewage effluent) . The conclusions drawn by Dan Boxrud of SEH (See Attachment #1) include : 1 . Effluent discharge volumes into the river trunk sewer would be 1 . 38 million gallons per day (MGD) under a scenario described in the above mentioned attachment . The pipe capacity available to Rahr is 1 . 583 MGD therefore, according to this scenario, there is sufficient capacity for Malt Houses #1-4 in the river trunk sewer. 2 . This scenario also envisions that Malt House #5 would discharge into a forcemain flowing South to the VIP sewer. The difference between what was discussed earlier and the present scenario is that Malt House #5 would be drained by means of a inverted syphon. This process is physically possible because of the head on Malt House #5 . The major advantages to Rahr with this inverted syphon would be that they would have to neither construct nor operate a sewage lift station. There appears to be no disadvantage to the City with this method, therefore this would be a win-win situation. Rahr is requesting the City extend the forcemain across their property to an area adjacent to Malt House #5 . The cost for this extension will be available by the Tuesday Committee of the Whole meeting and will be presented at that time . Attachment #2 provides for financial information on sewer revenues paid to the City by Rahr for the time period 1982-1990 along with the annual billing by the MWCC to the City of Shakopee, Rahr' s percentage of Shakopee' s total sewage flow, and the amount contribution paid to the City by Rahr which exceeds the amount paid by the City to the MWCC for sewage treatment . This attachment illustrates that Rahr' s contribution over this 9 year period was slightly more than $900, 000 . 00 above the amount paid by the City to the MWCC for treatment of Rahr' s sewage . As mentioned to the Council earlier, the City does experience additional costs for sewer system operation and maintenance above the amount paid to the MWCC. Representatives from Rahr will be at the Committee of the Whole meeting to discuss this issue in greater detail . RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Committee of the Whole discuss this matter and, if conclusions are reached, provide direction by motion to the City Council at their next meeting. DRK/tiv MAY-06-1993 16:28 FROM SEH-hPLS TO 4967055 P.02 A rf"A c �lH E. Al T ( -► 5909 BAKER ROAD.SUITE 590,MINNETONKA.MN 55345 612 931.9501 FAX 612 93 1-1 188 ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION May 6, 1993 RE: Rahr Malting Company Process Water Screening SEH File No.: 93210.01 Paul Kramer Rahr Malting Company 800 West First Avenue Shakopee MN 55379 Dear Paul: Per our discussions on May 5, 1993,we have investigated an additional means of screening and discharging your process water. You are able to operate your various malt houses using different amounts of steep water depending upon production needs. The production scenario you asked that we investigate included the following: 1. When production requirements so dictate, Malt House 5 would be operated at the steep rate of 48 gallons per bushel instead of 22 gallons per bushel originally anticipated. 2. Process water from Malt House 5 will be screened up in the malt house. 3. After screening, process water from Malt House 5 will drain by inverted syphon to the south to a 12"gravity sewer in Adams Street. 4. Process water discharged from Malt House 4 would continue to the north in the existing system. 5. Malt House 2 will be operated at the lower steep water rate of 22 gallons per bushel. 6. Process water from Malt Houses 1, 2, and 3 would be screened at the existing screenhouse through new rotary screens. 7. Process water flows from Malt Houses 1, 2, and 3 would be attenuated in the existing 350,000-gallon holding tank prior to discharge to the north. Under this scenario, we modeled the ability of the 350,000-gallon tank to adequately attenuate the flows from Malt Houses 1, 2, and 3.The attached computer spreadsheet labeled RahrMX2.WK1 documents that the total flow rate to the screens is below 2000 gallons per minute and that the tank height never exceeds 11'. Like our previous work, this considers the following conditions: 1. Pipe capacity of 21" RCP is 2.713 mgd = 1885 gpm 2. Reserve for high river level infiltration of 0.045 mgd = 31 gpm SHORT ELLIOTT HENORICKSON INC. ST.PAUL,MIJ ST.CLOUD,MN CHIPPEWA FALLS.WI MADISON.WI MAY-06-1993 16:29 FROM SEH-MPLS TO 4967055 P.03 Rahr Malting Company May 6, 1993 Page 2 3. Net available capacity is 2.668 mgd = 1853 gpm 4. Ultimate average daily flow is 1.085 mgd in the remainder of the River District • 5. Pipe capacity available to Rahr is 1.583 mgd 6. Timing of discharges from Malt Houses 2 and 3 adjusted to minimize flow rate through screens 7. "Total Allowable Discharge"based on Appendix F in"Process Water Screening Report"dated April 5, 1993 8. Flows are attenuated at the discharge from the holding tank so as to match "Total Allowable Discharge" to the River District Trunk. This scenario which you suggested appears to be the best scenario for both you and the city. Discharge volumes to the River District Trunk will total 1.38 mgd. Your discharge to the south from Malt House 5 can be accomplished through an inverted syphon instead of a lift station. No other on-site piping is necessary to route the flows to the screens or to a lift station. You have the ability to further attenuate the flows if the flow characteristics in the River District Trunk should change and approach a 2.45 peak factor instead of the 1.6 peak factor measured. This is demonstrated on the second spreadsheet labeled RahrMX3.WK1. We would recommend that you pursue this option with the city. We would also recommend that the means of screening the process water up in Malt House 5 be fully determined prior to beginning implementation. Sincerely, Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 0444;19 ce ecriCti Daniel R. Boxrud, P.E. ymb c: Dave Hutton Attachment Cr, _... a, LA) CO r-- TI�AC�li� 5-APT 2 0 1I Lr) ---. C71 (S> CV LO C C o) r- I-1 11 F H CO CO Lo m c71 C• r-- CO C >--• 11 W W La m c0 - .r, -o. V> m CL] G--• 11 V> V> V> .--. r-. CA- C71 1-. CO ►--1 II V> V> V> V) V> CC - c. II c--. 11 U O II O ) E 11 C) SJC II }. " CO II C/7 F DO II H q[] C> II CSC C) - G� 11 ,=.... . II .0 o CO = 11 Od E Q V II I 6q . - II II m CO C- CLD CO CO •-I c"-.) ... = C CO N CO -.Cr CO t''7 •-• CS, 11 . CC CO II 0 0 m m m m 0) m m •--7 II V> V> V> CO- V> V> V> V> V> ..:C C-.., O 11 F Z E1I d H11 a 0.7 II a E 11 ►--1 d 11 CC cC II ii CJ'] CO11 Cr] - II cC= CII > x C_) 11 d I--. 3e I1 • = _ II 7 II d II CT v--.I .--I as-I .-. CT Ln m = is r- W Cr, CO CO N' CT .-I 4 EII C) II Q m C9 Q Q Q Q .--. r-. 6O C+CI 11 CA- CA- V> V> V> - V> LA. V> E 6a a 1I ..c4 0-• ..0 = 11 I= Q C7 Q 11 Y II C/] ...c B 0 ^ II x C9 C.7 CO 11 C-,CO O rr) 3 it ✓ ---I Q ii 3= CZ, COa II " -. V) - 1S-I II 11 11 CO Lr/ C• r- LD ----I C' 0, LO C, is r- cr. C 01 r- CO Lr) C") O = 11 I-CS C r- ON N CO N LO m CO F--1 It �� 1I LO N LD C9 r— .--I r) 6 LD C 2 a II L.C. Ts-) ON Cr, 0. Cr, Lr) co LD CIS H II LAO L.C. LO • r- r- c0 Cr. m CL =I 11 V> V> V> V> < V> V> V> C=II II ..--. C) Ti V) C) 11 CA- = i Ti Cn t. ew oa ov oa oa oa o.o ow o10 Cr) II --. m N -•-• r- m - •---I LC/ N II CO CO CO CO C la-I L17 I.rl C C -- 11 -- 11 C1• I I C] Ti p10 ,( II 11 CO 11 CC CO 3c II Ti C.-• Q 7 I1 CC Q E c.a u II 11 r-. --+ N CT M LO C- 0COCO6C1 11 N I- T - D r- CO cr. O CO C.7 11 t- r- r- cO CO CO CO c0 CO 11 Cc: a .d II PC 11 CL E II CJ II II F. 11 xo C7 11 CJ7 . = II 11 11 CO C-4 ON tr7 r- C- CO cV N Es. 11 d C7 11 V> V> <A V> V> V> LA- V> V> I:= II CS, II Q 11 CxG C9 II d .-4II Ti OC !n 11 u 11 m m O sSs C9 O m m C9 II C4 m szss szsa m i Q m m • II m Q c m m m Q m Q 11 Cc> La r-. C- t-0 r-- CS> 0 C1 . -. t]C1 /I LO r- C71 .-. N Li/ C71 LSI ON Cp II N C- C1 CO Lr) Lr) Lr) 1.1-1 C CO.GL. II V> V> V> CO- V> V> V> VI. V> Q 11 1= 11 II = 1I 04 Cr] II II II CV CV Lr) C N ON .---. .--. N It CV CO C Liz .---I CO C.O. Lr) Q = II CV N CV N C C -Cr* C C C.--. 11 C) C7 11 ..0 X II 11 C C ,c 1I Q 11 II r+.. I. 11 11 CV CO C Lr) LD r- CO C71 Q Ti CIO CO CO CO CO 00 CO CO C71 Il C7. O1 cr. 01 C71 C71 ON 01 1171 1 OC] I I y II MAY-11-1953 11 15 FROM TO O-4456713 P.02 t'VY-11--1993 07:20 F 1 .3E-i-1,-Pts TO 4%'265 P.02 1 5 el 5779 SAKER ROAD.SJIrE 397 MINNETONKA.M6.53'$ 612 93:.95x1 FAX 61293.'-1788 A N1T5c JRE • F'V,i.YcERIN3 • b'JVpoNME7YTAL • FRA.N.SPQRTATrON May 10, 1993 RE: Rahr Malting Company Process Water Screening SEH File No.: 93210.01 PauI Kramer Rahr Malting Company 800 West First Avenue Shakopee MN 55379 Dear Paul: Per your request of May 7, 1993,we have further explored the feasibility of using an inverted syphon for Malt House S as a discharge to the south. Per our discussion and other information available,-we have made the following assumptions: 1. Process water from Malt House 5 will be routed easterly to a location near the existing screenhousc. This will allow a pressure filter to remove solids at the same location solids are being removed from process water being discharged from Malt Houses 1, 2, and 3. 2. After filtering, process water will continue to flow under pressure to near the south cnd of the 350,000-gallon hoiding tank. 3. A 12"pressure pipe would be extended from near the south end of the holding tank to your south property line at Third Avenue. This line would Connect to the main proposed to be constructed by the City. The first segment of pipe immediately southwest of the tank will be above grade due to conflicts with a tunnel. The remainder of the pipe will be below grade,requiring railroad track erossi,v, rock excavation, and restoration. 4. Valves and fittings would be necessary to allow for periodic cleaning of the sag point of the inverted syphon. There is approximately 750' of 12"pressure pipe which would need to be installed from near the south end of the 350,000-gallon holding tank to the south property line. Based on this length and the site conditions, we conservatively estimate that the total project cost of this improvement would be $77,500. This includes a 10% contingency factor and 25% for administrative cost`. l believe this provides you with all the information you had requested in order to continue your discussions with the City of Shakopee. If you or the City of Shakopee require any further information, please feel free to call. Sincerely, tc2acetA;) Daniel R Boxrud, .E. Attachment c: Dave Hutton, City of Shakopee • s+ ret.uc7r hr7VerGKSQN 1K7. ST,PAUL MN 5?CLO'10.MN c,174-AEviA FALLS,fir, M47tSON.W1 TO 9-4456718 P.03 MAY-11-1993 11:17 FROM TO 496'705 P'� I '1 W-11-1993 07:20 FROM S=--i PLS Cost Estimate - Inverted Sy pbon Unit Est. Est. Eta WO Qnti gorti $25 750 $18,750 ;;�" DIP, CL 52 24" Steel casing pipe LF. 100 $0 $,000 Insulation S.Y. 25 8 200 ., _ 2 1300 2600 I4rittiR$S 12" Butterfly valve &box Each 1200 3 3,600 Railroad crossing- remove Each 2500 2 5,000 � replace rails Rock excavation (open cut) C.Y. 25 500 12,500 Granular pipe subgrade bacic511 C.Y. 5 1$0 900 Steel walkways/stairways Each 1500 2 3,000 Restoration &erosion control LS. 1850 1 L850 Total $56,400 + 10% Contingency aSal Construction Cost $62,000 +25% Administrative TOTAL S'77,S00 TOW(. P.03 1 I . I tel Y Z ll 0 1- i i u 1- >-,z, t I z c,o G W K O J O.J.. % J.' � d K -iI j - 1S 3J213ld '1S 3JN31d : A M / i 9 /is I \ m IF-7. i . ..,i io 1 , ., s, . , s, ..., ir / 1,=�• ,, /00 is . • II • .,, ,, 131 s z .0. : „,...i ! z I I pe w ; ' --- hl a i o I a ®.a= Ir r ... I II 1 I~ cit- 'c 41 i t # i Q I . , .,„ , , ,,,.; ej, L ig _ II Ls; y , , g, I . • 2 .. ... c „...1R II 1 Y - 1 L ! LY! I.il ' Lamm lin 1.'71117---`111 al iI `8II 1 �I �.. • J isimm 0., . 1; f a I - !r� 6� • s= / . i . II ir : ' .._x r� IIII ` a - i I - I ! U -I11 . , •-, . II I ° - dII F., lir \ jl ' I '7. Y 1p1 . v 5,_ t1 !' ' . i; ° WI ° 1 3 ".� d © •• C..) ,14 ! o . `; t o © o rZz H uj • '" v) 0\ \\\ 0 *,,,,_\:\ , . ..:, ,..., >., . ... w F, , •'• ,x{ W o 0 --, y r ; >< 66 o '1 x= w TENTATIVE AGENDA BOARD OF REVIEW REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 11, 1993 LOCATION: City Hall, 129 Holmes Street South 1] Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M. by Robert Sweeney, 1992 Chairman 2] Election of Chairman 3 ] Purpose of Board of Review - by Bob Schmitt 4] Summary of the 1993 Assessments for Shakopee - by Bob Schmitt 5] Beverly Koehnen Property - Parcel #27-916009-0 6] Ralph O. Goode Property - Parcel #27-924003-0 7] Daniel Cheever Property - Parcel #27-043004-0 8] Robert Mintz Property - Parcel #27-050003-0 9] Allen Fournier Property - Parcel #27-051013-0 10] Curtis Olson Property - Parcel #27-058018-0 11] Plat of Condominium #1015 - Parcel #27-151001-0 to 27-151004-0 12] John Brambilla Property - Parcel #27-001034-0 13] John Brambilla Property - Parcel #27-055005-1 14] Members of the audience: a] b] c] d] e] f] g] h] i] 15] Move that the findings of the Board of Review be approved and sent to the County Auditor for certification; or, continue the Board of Review to . . . 16] Adjourn Dennis R. Kraft City Administrator \••S City of Shakopee Board of Review The Board of Review will address objections to the property class and/or the market value as of January 2nd of this year. The Board does not determine TAXES and may not entertain such objections. The Board's powers are limited to correcting the property class and/or the market value as of January 2nd In the year In which the Board meets, and the Board has no jurisdiction to correct assessments made in previous years. The owner Is responsible for presenting evidence to the Board as to why the property class and/or the market value determined by the assessor Is not fair and equitable. PLEASE SPEAK CLEARLY, the meeting Is being recorded. The Board has the authority to decrease, sustain, or Increase the market value. The owner will be notified by mall within 20 days of the Board's decision concerning the appeal. Subsequent appeal procedures include the County Board of Equalization and the Minnesota Tax Court. Refer to the reverse side of your valuation notice for additional Information regarding these appeal methods. t 6/90 Ibt 11110111111 SCOTT COUNTY ASSESS COURTHOUSE 112 428 SOUTH HOLMES SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612) 496-8115 Fax No. (612) 496-8257 To: 1993 Shakopee Board of Review Date: May 11, 1993 Subject: Summary of the 1993 Assessment conducted for the City of Shakopee by Robert N. Schmitt, Senior Appraiser, Scott County Assessor's Office. The 1993 assessment for Shakopee involved the appraisal of newly constructed buildings for which building permits were issued during 1992. It also involved the appraisal of buildings which were in a partial completion stage as of January 2, 1992. These prop- erties were checked for completion of construction work for the 1993 assessment. The annual recheck of twentyfive percent of the property in Shakopee was also conducted and included the unplatted areas of Shakopee and the plats located in "section" land. Permit totals for the 1992 year totalled 478. Of these 52 were for commercial or industrial projects, 178 were for housing units (single family or twinhomes) , and the remainder being for items such as garages, porches, etc. Seventy-eight permits were issued for items which are not valued for tax purposes such as signs, fences on resi- dential property, etc. Partial completion rechecks from the 1992 assessment totalled 95. The 25% reassessment involved 30 sections or partial sections in rural Shakopee and involved .all the plats located within these section. These plats are listed on the attached page. The stuctures within these areas were inspected or a:tag left on site, if our records indicated that the last inspection was dated some time ago or if the property appeared to have been either updated, rundown, or any other condition which may have impacted the valuation. All of the above inspections and checking of building permits and partial completions were carried out by myself. The field work for the 1993 assessment covered a period from August 10, 1992 to January 12, 1993. A total of approximately 280 hours were spent in this inspection work. 1267 notices of valuation or classification change were sent. Respectfully Submitted, Robert N. Schmitt Senior Appraiser An Equal Opportunity!Affirmative Action Employer SHAKOPEE 1993 REASSESSMENT SCHEDULE Section Land 042 RL3 #006 • 043 RLS #1024 044 PLS #'X45 • 045 RLS #1047 047 F.i1,?rney Hills 048 Montecito Heights ' i_u.0 oschke'_ • 050 Eae l ewaod 051 Deervies•a Acres 053 Riverview Estates 65' RLS #066 055 Valley Park: 1st 056 Eaalewood 2nd 057 tiaras • 059 Zoschke's F'eplat 0.0 Eaglewood 3rd 0.1 Timber Trails 0.2 Horizon Heights 064 Horizon Heights 2nd • 067 Valley Fark 2nd 069 Horizon Heights 3rd • 070 Patch 1st 071 Montecit,c, Heights End 073 Cretex Ind. Park 1st 076 Valley park 3rd • 077 Valley Park 4th 078 Clay 1st 079 I(c,skavich Valley Pk. 1st 081 Valley Perk 5th • 082 Hillside Estates 1st 085 DCCO 1st ('84 Halls 098 Strc.bel 's 1st • 082 Valley Park 6th • 025 Ziegler- ' 028 Weina.ndt Acres. 1st . 092Valley Rich 1st 103 Case 1st 105 Hoe 1st ! • • 107 A r3 1st 110 Superior Supply 1st 117 Prahmcnli 1st 123 Canterbury Park 2nd • • 126 l.PV 1st 127 Prairie House 1st . 130 Fox F:un 1st 132 Bchringer's 1st 135 Hukriede's 1st • 137 Prairie House 2nd 139 Meadowbrook Pun • 140 Kubes 2nd Add'n. 141 Valley Park 7th 142 Stonebrooke 1st Add'n. . • 144 Canterbury Park 1st 144 Horizon Heights 4th 148 RLS #134 151 Condominium #1015 152 Hillwood Estates 160 Meadows 6th, the 1L: t°circ_+-it. M-r► J Add'; , 161 Mark J. Weinandt Add'n. 162 Mulberry Meadow 1st 163 Eagle Creek Junction 3rd 164 Wei.ne.ndt Acres 2nd 1. 5 Beckrich Park Estates 166 Prairie Estates 2nd 1.67 Minns valley 6th 160 Minn Valley 7th DON D. MARTIN SCOTT COUNTY ASSESSOR COURTHOUSE 112 - 428 S. HOLMES ST. SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612) 496-8115 Deputy: LEROY T.ARNOLD! To: The 1993 Shakopee B0CJLd o6 Review Date: May 11, 1993 Subject: Beverly Koehnen Property PID# 27 916 009 0 Dezchi,pti.on o4 Pn.opelrty: This property is located at 2036 County Road #83. The land area is 13.00 acres. The buildings consist of a 1 story home of 2067 square feet which was built in 1963 with an area above basement of 1492 square feet and an area with no basement below of 575 square feet. The property has 2 detached garages. The first built in 1963 is 22 x 20 and the second, built in 1977 is 26 x 30. The home has 1 3/4 baths, a fin shedbasement -t.-ea o,, 600 square feet, 2 fireplaces, and a open front porch. atu 0n n wtmauon: The land is valued at $48,500 The structures are valued at $117,600 and include the home, garages, a 27 x 36 wood shed, a 45 x 60 concrete patio, and a 16 x 32 in-ground swimming pool. The total value for the property is $166,100 and the classification of the property is agricultural homestead. 1992 Estimated Market Value: Land $ 48,100 Buildings $ 117,600 Total $165,700 Oihe,'r. InOnmat on: An Equal Opportunity'Affirmative Action Employer DON D. MARTIN 6 SCOTT COUNTY ASSESSOR COURTHOUSE 112 • K 428 S. HOLMES ST. SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612) 496-8115 DePuN: LEROY T.ARNOLD! To: The 1993 Shakopee Board os Review Daze: May 11, 1993 Subject: Ralph 0. Goode Property PID# 27 924 003 0 Deac.)ripti.on o Pito pertzy: 32.25 acres of bare land located in section 24. The property lies just north'of the intersection of Muhlenhardt Road and State Highway 18. The property is rolling with a few trees on the north portion of the parcel. • The property is currently used for farming with alfalfa being the only crop grown on the land. A small shed of minimal construction was built on the property in 1987-88 and measures 21 x 28. It is used to shelter a baler and other equipment. 1993 Vauuc.. Lon InsonmatLon: The parcel is valued a agricultural land and the value for the land is $68,300. The structure located on the property is valued at $500. Total value for the property is $68,800 The property was purchased in 1983 by Mr. Goode for $74,750. 1992 Estimated Market Value: Land $ 22,600 Buildings $ 500 Total $23,100 O.titet Inioicmation: This parcel and other parcels of small agreage, (not small tracts of a large farm) , is valued as stated to keep it in line with the valuation policy of the County for agricultural property and Hobby Farm property. I have set up a graduated rate system for valueing smaller tracts of land which may be classified as agricultural, but would basically sell for developmental or building sites. An Equal Opportunity!Affirmative Action Employer Id" SCOTT COUNTY ASSESS,.,3 COURTHOUSE 112 428 SOUTH HOLMES SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612) 496-8115 Fax No. (612) 496-8257 May 4, 1993 Mr. Ralph 0. Goode 9132 Upton Ave. So. Bloomington, MN. 55431 Re: PID# 27 924 003 0 Dear Mr. Goode; Enclosed are sales of vacant land which have taken place within the city limits of Shakopee over the past few years. They are sales of land with areas between 10 and 77 acres in size. I have listed the date of sale, area, sale price, and price per acre for your information. 1. 12/92 77.27 acres $475,000 $6147 per acre Used for subdivision 2. 11/90 73.75 acres $200,000 $2711 per acre 3. 9/91 18.19 acres $ 59,471 $3269 per acre 4. 1/92 40.00 acres $ 61,127 $1528 per acre 5. 3/88 40.00 acres $160,000 $4000 per acre Co. Rd. 83 influence 6. 7/92 39.85 acres $100,000 $2509 per acre 7. 8/89 10.00 acres $ 37,500 $3750 per acre S. 5/95 31.81 A..c c., 1. I t,,�sZ }35'OE I think this should illustrate that the smaller tracts sell for more per acre than do the larger tracts, if you exclude the affect of location. Your property would probably sell for something in the area of $3500 - $4000 per acre and would sell as developmental property. The issue of real estate taxes should not be addressed here, but I can suggest that you may want to consider applying for "Green Acres" which is an agricultural program designed to lessen the effect of urban development on farm land. It places a "taxable" value on the qualifying property based on what it is worth as farm land and continues on this program until the land is sold or developed. Then, a deferred tax is due on the property which is for the amount of tax which the owner saved for the 3 years prior to the sale date. If the owner sells to a qualifying party, the "Green Acre" classification would continue to be in place until the property no longer cualifys. I have enclosed an aplication. An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer / o • ': !1-'�- ° ‘17,; " e(_� s(:•' r';:�-y •:_,••moi _ - \ ��i;� , • n i a f„. o a! w : o,iI s ;i�SI :i4 �,�tw.,,,ivdrt ' .- tJ ....... "4, .� - 9 i DON D. MARTIN SCOTT COUNTY ASSESSOR 1.1111/1!!!!! COURTHOUSE 112 tA 428 S. HOLMES ST. SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612) 496-8115 Deputy: LEROY T.ARNOLD! To: The 1993 Shakopee Board oti Review Date: May 11, 1993 Subject: Daniel Cheever property PID# 27 043 004 0 DescJ_tpt.Lon Pnopeirty: The property is located at 9040 13th East in Shakopee. The property has a site size of 100 x 150. The structures include a 1 story home which was built in 1935 and is 834 sq. ft. on the main level. An addition was added in 1981 with no basement and has 196 sq. ft. A detached garage was built in 1974 with a size of 20 x 20. The home also has a screened porch (14 x 14) and central air conditioning. The property was purchased by Mr. Cheever in May, 1982 for $58,000. 1993 Vataat.LOn In50AMa iOn: The land is valued at $16,000. The structures are valued at $53,100 for a total value of $69,100. 1992 Estimated Market Value: Land $ 16,000 Buildings $ 43,800 Total $59,800 Othe,t InsoAmati.on: An Equal Opportunity lAJrrmatiue Action Employer DON D. MARTIN SCOTT COUNTY ASSESSOR 5) '' COURTHOUSE 112 • • ` {' 428 S. HOLMES ST. SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612) 496-8115 Deputy: LEROY T.ARNOLD! To: The 1993 Shakopee 8oaitd of Review Date: May 11, 1993 Subj ect: Robert Mintz property PID# 27 050 003 0 De4ctrLptr:on os Pnopeirty: The property is located at 3560 Marschall Road. Lot 3 Block 1 Eaglewood Addition. The property has a lot with a size of 2.50 acres. The buildings consist of a home built in 1986 with a size of 1248 square feet. The home is 1 story, with an attached garage of 22 x 36, a walkout, an 8 x 24 open porch and a 8 x 8 enclosed porch. The home is a Miles Home. 1993 Va aa..t ,on Infio1rmcLt on: Land value: $21,000 Structure : $62,500 Total $83,500 The property was revalued for the 1993 assessment as part of the 25% reassessment. At the time the property was rechecked, (9/3/92) , it was found that the open porch size was previously incorrect. The stated size was 128 sq. ft. , the correct size should be 192 sq. ft. The enclosed porch had not been assessed at all. The garage had been in a partial stage of completion since 1986 and is now assessed as completed. The home had also been in a state of partial completion since 1986 and is now considered 100% finished. 1992 Estimated Market Value: Land $21,000 Buildings $ 55,200 Total $ 76,200 Othejt Inliohmation: New construction amounts to $7300 for the 1993 assessment. The property was purchased in August of 1990 for $58,000 from Miles Homes in a partial state of completion. An Equal Opportunity lAfrmatioeAction Employer 111111111111 �..- DON D. MARTIN SCOTT COUNTY ASSESSOR COURTHOUSE 112 , - ? -..c:kti '`' 428 S. HOLMES ST. .it SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612) 496-8115 Deputy: LEROY T.ARNOLD, To: The 1993 Shakopee Boand of Review Date: May 11, 1993 Subject: Allen Fournier property PID# 27 051 013 0 DeiSCA4tiOn o{ Pnopejtty: Located at 201 Mulberry Circle. Lot 10 Block 2 Deerview Acres Addition to Shakopee. The lot is 2.8.9 acres in size. The home is 1 story built in 1973 with 2125 square feet. The garage is attached and is 28 x 24 with a tuck-under a_arace beneath the main garage. The basement is 70% finished, the home has 3 full baths, 1 I bath, plus a wetbar in the basement. There are 2 fireplaces, central-air, a deck, screened porch, and a walkout. 1993 Va.2uation Insoumai,on: The home was part of the 25% reassement for the 1993 assessment and the value was increased to place this property closer to market value than I believe it was in past years. Lot Value $ 27,300 Structures $144,300 Total $171,300 1992 Estimated Market Value: Land $ 27,000 Buildings $117,900 Total $144,900 ()then. Insonmat on: An Equal Opportunity 1Affirmative Action Employer DON D. MARTIN •.- / SCOTT COUNTY ASSESSOR `1 COURTHOUSE 112 • ; ''' 428 S. HOLMES ST. SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612) 496-8115 Deputy: LEROY T.ARNOLD! To: The 1993 Shakopee Board Review Date: May 11, 1993 Subject: Curtis Olson Property PID# 27 058 018 0 DUCA ptc:on 06 Pnopenty: Located at 620 McDevitt Street, Lot 8 Block 3 Prairie View 1st Addition. The home is a 1 story home built in 1976 with 1400 square feet. The basement is 70% finished, there is 1 fireplace, 2 full + a 3/4 bath, a concrete patio, a 24 x 24 attached garage with a 12 x 24 addition to the garage in 1991. A 3 season porch was added in 1991 and completed in 1992 with 192 square feet. 1993 Vatuati,on Insonma i,on: For the 1992 assessment the 3 season porch was considered 95% complete (no floor cover, electric roughed,interior not painted) , for the 1993 assessment the porch was appraised as 100% finished. Lot Value $26,900 Structures $82,100 Total $109,000 1992 Estimated Market Value: Land $ 26,900 Buildings $ 82,600 Total $ 109,500 Other In6wrmat-ion: An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer DON D. MARTIN 1/ SCOTT COUNTY ASSESSOR COURTHOUSE 11 • 2 "_ 428 S. HOLMES ST. SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612) 496-8115 Deputy: LEROY T.ARNOLDI To: The 1993 Shakopee 8oand otc Review Daae: May 11, 1993 Subject: Property located in Plat of Condominium #1015 PID# 27 151 001 0 to 27 151 004 0 Ductip .ion o4 Pnopenty: Units 1 to 4 The property consists of an industrial office/warehouse condominium which was built in 1989 - 90. There are 4 units in the condo with areas of 2040 square feet for warehouse space and 120 square feet for office space in each unit. The building is 16' high and constructed of concrete block with a flat roof. The office areas are sheet rocked with carpeted floors. 1993 Vatuati.on Inso'ma ion: Land $12000 (each unit) Structures $59,300 Total $71,300 The valuation of the units is based on sales of this type of property in the metro area with adjustments being made for locational differences. The units in this complex sold for $88,602 for Unit 1 in May, 1990 and $89,696 for Unit 4 in May, 1990. Units 2 and 3 are owned by Chris Anderson who had the structure built. 1992 Estimated Market .Value: Land $12,000 Buildings $ 64,100 Total $ 76,100 ()then In4oiunc..ton: See Video from Mr. Anderson. An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer DON D. MARTIN �, SCOTT COUNTY ASSESSOR 2__. 1-1101!!!!! COURTHOUSE 112 • ;: �acs•- 428 S. HOLMES ST SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612) 496-8115 Deputy: LEROY T.ARNOLD! To: The 1993 Shakopee Boand os Review Date.: May 11, 1993 Subject: John Brambilla Property PID# 27 001 034 0 Dezutipt on 06 Pnope'zty: Located at 203 E. 1st Avenue. A commercial building originally constructed in 1965 and-remodeled in 1986. The building is 1 story with 7800 square feet. 4200 square feet are garage area and storage and the other 3600 square feet ' are leased retail area which currently are occupied by Dominoes Pizza and Valley Glass. The land area is 10,290 square feet. Mr. Brambilla would like this property` to be noted into the record for possible future consideration at the County Board of Review on June 15, 1993. DON D. MARTIN SCOTT COUNTY ASSESSOR 1.11111/1!!!!! M'"' COURTHOUSE 112 • 428 S. HOLMES ST. SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612) 496-8115 Deputy: LEROY T.ARNOLD, To: The 1993 Shakopee &and os Review Date: May 11, 1993 Subject: John Brambilla Property PID# 27 055 005 1 De4CAipti,on PnopeA /: Located at 550 Valley Park Drive, Part of Lot 1 Block 4 Valley Park 1st Addition. This property is 9.33 acres in size and has a structure which was constructed in 1992 for the sale and service of Recreational Vehicles. The building is made up of a showroom portion of 5106 square feet, an office area of 1680 square feet, .a mezzanine area of 5944 square feet, a garage area of 17,876 square feet, and covered parking of 7476 square feet. The building has a gross building area of 30,606 square feet and is 19' high in the showroom area and 22' high in the remainder. 1993 VaLuatLon Insoknati.on: Site value $ 223,900 Structure $1,186,000 Paved area $ 69,400 -'(91,400 s.f.) Total Value $1,479,300 1992 Estimated Market .Value: Land $ NA Buildings $ NA Total $ NA O.thet Insonmati.on: An Equal Opportunity affirmative Action Employer DON D. MARTIN SCOTT COUNTY ASSESSOF, ,air, ' COURTHOUSE 112 • 428 S. HOLMES ST. SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612) 496-8115 Deputy: LEROY T.ARNOLD! To: The 1993 Shakopee Board o5 Review Date: May 11, 1993 Subject: Wallace Bastian Property PID #27 906 106 0 DesClEiption o5 Ptop ez.y: Located at 409 E. Shakopee Avenue. This is a 2 story duplex which was built in 1855. The property has apartments up and down. The building is 1152 s.f. on the ground floor with a full 2nd story. The property has no garage. The lot is .19 acres or 8276 square feet in size. Both of the Apts. have a living room, kitchen, dining room, 2 bedrooms, 1 bath and a nursery, and a utility room. There are two open porches of 364 sq. ft. and a 6 x 24 concrete patio. 1993 Vatua,t t.on In6oAmat.(An: The property was rechecked for the 1993 assessment and the values updated to place this property in an equalized postion when compared to similar property in the City. The 1993 land value is $16,100 The 1993 building value is $59,100 Total value for 1993 $75,200 OMze,t M6°,1/flat-ion: The 1992 land value was $16,100 The 1992 building value was $52,100 Total 1992 value $68,200 From the attached sales, I would estimate the property to have a resale value of between $75,000 to $82,000. An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 115 Z t 855 �a a (�sx ��?� t 5.55. 2 RESIDENTIAL SALES IN SHAKOPEE 2'2 1988 to Present Sale Home G.F. PID Date Tvoe Area Age Garage Lot Size S.P./0 Remarks 270015150 9/91 1i 780 1948 832 60 x 142 $ 75, 000 270017780 6/91 11 932 1945 408 71 x 180 $ 85, 000 270018310 7/91 1i 799 1900 240 60 x 142 $ 59, 000 270230010 8/91 1i 1120 1965 Tuck 72 x 139 $ 79,300 271310610 8/91 2 1248 1989 624 90 x 125 $125, 750 _ 271590010 10/91 1i 1127 1848 618 21,4550 $ 80,000 270015330 10/91 1i 1052 1947 280 55 x 142 $ 86, 500 270015340 8/91 1i 1031 1905 256 60 x 142 $ 78, 000 270015440 10/91 1i 759 1895 627 60 x .142 $ 72,500 270016650 10/91 13 708 1947 484 82 x 120 • $ 74, 000 270018580 11/91 1i 656 1890 528 140 x 102 $ 56,000 270020310 10/91 2 878 1956 420 80 x 150 $103,500 270040740 9/91 1i 708 1942 440 60 x 142 $ 69,000 270015460 12/91 li 698 1914 432 60 x 142 $ 50,000 270014110, 9/91 11 957 1931 280 60 x 142 $ 63, 200 270014140 10/91 2 1004 1908 988 70 x 142 $ 89, 000 270018020 11/91 1i 978 1890 520 8 384 1 .83 Aches $ 69,900 279061130 1/92 1U 748 1956 676 60 x 150 $ 82, 000 279180092 3/92 1i 686 1900 864 2.50 Aches $ 62, 005 270012380 3/92 2 1193 1902 220 C.P. 70 x 127 $ 94, 900 270012740 2/92 1i 1102 1900 624 55 x 142 $ 57, 900 270080460 3/92 1i 988 1954 276 87 x 144 $ 85, 000 270430050 2/92 2 761 1935 100 x 150 $ 47, 000 270120170 2/92 2 720 1965 484 69 x 115 $ 80,000 270120110 3/91 2 1032 1960 420 103 x 149 $ 91,600 270040280 3/92 14 805 1895 768 60 x 142 $ 76,000 270016520 3/91 1i 836 1905 400 60 x 142 •$ 75, 000 270015810 2/92 1i 872 1895+ 60 x 134 $ 69, 900 270014120 3/92 1 3/4 816 1915 60 x 142 $ 76, 000 270013600 '4/92 2 2475 1910 8 49 71 x 120 (Conve ..Lon Sa.ee)$ 86, 000 270012010 2/92 1 3/4 748 1890 480 60 x 142 $ 65,000 279070390 4/92 li 956 1939 308 60 x 142 $ 84,500 279070380 3/92 1i 876 1952 705 (2) 60 x 142 $ 79, 900 279061350 6/92 li 780 1910 308 208 x 255 (No neaLton) $ 55,000 279130620 5/92 1i 1040 1903 630 3.32 Acne4 $117,000 270010810 7/92 • 1i 892 1873 560 60 x 142 $ 55,000 270015420 3/92 13/4 908 1938 ' '308 55 x 142 $ 85,000 270016300 6/92 1i 830 1924 520 71 x 120 $ 78, 500 270017561 3/92 1i 776 1938 162 71 x 120 $ 72,369 270018350 5/92 la 665 1920 484 60 x 142 $ 69,900 270018500 6/92 2 . 1419 1875 968 60 x 142 $ 93,000 270580080 5/92 2 1160 - 1977 750 112 x 135 $136,800 271300010 3/92 11 1867 1989 977 21.60 Aches $285, 500 279140050 5/92 2/0 1127 1859 506 16.36 Acres $175,000 270012020 8/92 2/0 854 1865 576 50 x 142 $ 79,900 27nn14030 7/92 1} 926 1950 672 60 x 142 $ 83,500 27,1i14520 6/92 13/4 832 1946 300 60 x 142 $ 78,750 270015200 6/92 11 932 1949 484/364 70 x 142 $ 78,000 270018550 8/92 2/0 910 1900 60 x 142 . $ 57,000 270530120 6/92 2/3 1450 1977 572 2.00 Acres $.42,500 DON D. MARTIN SCOTT COUNTY ASSESSOR COURTHOUSE 112 • 428 S. HOLMES ST. at`;e3 . c�... SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612) 496-8115 Deputy: LEROYT.ARNOLDI To: The 1993 Shakopee Boand os Review Date: May 11, 1993 Subject: Wallace Bastian Property PID# 27 906 107 0 De.sc.'u:p.t on Pnopenty: Located at 869 Spencer Street in Shakopee. This is a 2i story home which was originally constructed in 1908. The home is 932 square feet in size on the main level. The property has a 50% finished basement with a family room, I bath, and a utility room. The main floor has a living room, kitchen, dining room,. 1 bedroom, } bath. The 2nd floor has 3 bedrooms, 1 full bath, and the 21 story portion has 1 bedroom and a I bath. The home was moved onto this site in 1958. The lot is 55 x 135. In 1991 a garage was added to the property of 18 x 22, 1993 Va_u.c.t on In60 matiCn: T e home has been updated over the years with new vinyl siding and the general upkeep of maintenance items. The property had never been assessed for the bedroom on the 21 story level. The 1993 value for the land is $15,500 The 1993 value for the building is $63,200 Total value for 1993 $78,700 1992 Estimated Market Value: Land $15,500 Buildings $ 55,900 Total $ 71,300 O.the t In4otjma Lon: From the attached sales, I would estimate the property to have a resale value of approximately $83,000 to $85,000. • An Equal Opportunity affirmative Action Employer RESIDENTIAL SALES IN SH_ KOPEE 2 1988 to Present '132 i ws3 35 ls, z55 X 135 Sale Home G.F. PID Date Type Area Age Garage Lot Size S.P./0 Remarks 270015150 9/91 1i 780 1948 832 60 x 142 $ 75, 000 270017780 6/91 11 932 1945 408 71 x 180 $ 85, 000 270018310 7/91 11 799 1900 240 60 x 142 $ 59, 000 270230010 8/91 li 1120 1965 Tuck 72 x 139 $ 79, 300 271310610 8/91 2 1248 1989 624 90 x 125 $125, 750 271590010 10/91 1U 1127 1848 678 21,4550 $ 80, 000 270015330 10/91 1i 1052 1947 280 55 x 142 $ 86, 500 270015340 8/91 1i 1031 1905 256 60 x 142 $ 78, 000 270015440 10/91 li 759 1895 627 60 x .142 $ 72, 500 270016650 10/91 lU 708 1947 484 82 x 120 $ 74, 000 270018580 11/91 13 656 1890 528 140 x 702 $ 56, 000 270020370 10/91 2 878 1956 420 80 x 150 $103, 500 270040740 9/91 1i 708 1942 440 60 x 142 $ 69,000 270015460 12/91 1i 698 1914 432 60 x 142 $ 50, 000 270014110 9/91 71 957 1931 280 60 x 142 $ 63,200 270014140 10/91 2 1004 1908 988 70 x 142 $ 89, 000 270018020 11/91 71 978 1890 520 S 384 1 .83 Acnes $ 69, 900 279061130 1/92 li 748 1956 676 60 x 150 $ 82, 000 279180092 3/92 1i 686 1900 864 2. 50 Acne,. $ 62, 005 270012380 3/92 2 1193 1902 220 C.P. 70 x 127 $ 94, 900 270012740 2/92 1i 1102 1900 624 55 x 142 $ 57,900 270080460 3/92 1i 988 7954 276 87 x 144 $ 85, 000 270430050 2/92 2 761 1935 100 x 150 $ 47, 000 270120770 2/92 2 720 1965 484 69 x 115 $ 80, 000 270120110 3/91 2 1032 1960 420 703 x 149 $ 91,600 270040280 3/92 11 805 1895 768 60 x 142 $ 76, 000 270016520 3/91 11 836 1905 400 60 x 142 $ 75,000 270015810 2/92 13 872 1895+ 60 x 134 69. 900 _ 270014120 3/92 1 3/4 816 1915 60 x 142 $ 76,000 270013600 4/92 2 2475 1910 5 49 71 x 120 (ConvenoJ.on Sage)$ 86, 000 270012010 2/92 1 3/4 748 1890 480 60 x 142 $ 65,000 279070390 4/92 1i 956 1939 308 60 x 142 $ 84,500 279070380 3/92 11 876 1952 705 (2) 60 x 142 $ 79, 900 279061350 6/92 1i 780 1910 308 208 x 255 (No neattot) $ 55,000 279130620 5/92 1U 1040 1903 630 3.32 Actes $117, 000 270010810 7/92 11 892 1873 560 60 x 142 $ 55. 000 270015420 3/92 13/4 908 1938 308 55 x 142 $ 85, 000 270016300 6/92 1i 830 1924 520 71 x 120 $ 78,500 270017561 3/92 1i 776 1938 162 71 x 120 . $ 72,369 270018350 5/92 11 665 1920 484 60 x 142 $ 69, 900 270018500 6/92 2 _ 1419 1875 9.68 60 x 142 $ 93,000 270580080 5/92 2 1160 1977 750 112 x 135 $136,800 271300010 3/92 11 1867 1989 977 21.60 Achu $285,500 ,279140050 5/92 2/0 1127 1859 506 16.36 Acres S175,000 270012020 8/92 2/0 854 1865 576 50 x 142 S 79,900 27nn14030 7/92 l} 926 1950 672 60 x 142 $ 83,500 27(,o14520 6/92 13/4 832 1946 300 60 x 142 $ 78,750 270015200 6/92 1} 932 1949 484/364 70 x 142 $ 78,000 270018550 8/92 2/0 910 1900 60 x 142 $ 57,000 270530120 6/92 2/B 1450 1977 572 2.00 Acres $142,500 , RESIDENTIAL SALES IN SHAKOPEE 1988 to Present Sale Home G.F. _I Date Tvoe Area Age Garage Lot Size S.P./0 Remarks 270012730 9/92 1 3/4 664 1900 616 40 x 142 $ 51,350 271420070 2/92 2 1343 1992 589 21,780 $218,265 270012220 11/92 1} 828 1915 400 60 x 142 $ 50,000 270010850 10/92 1} 981 1873 318 60 x 71 $ 32,000 270015510 1/93 13/4 845 1890 336 60 x 142 $ 68,900 270016290 12/92 1} 1192 1936 528 71 x 120 $ 89,900 270016500 9/92 13/4 912 1946 + 336 120 x 142 $ 89,900 270400550 1/93 2 1150 1974 728 98 x 139 $108,000 271650330 11/92 2 1324 1992 760 1.33 Ac. $219,828 271700040 11/92 2 1092 1992 440 12,750 0 $102,460