Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03/02/1993
TENTATIVE AGENDA REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MARCH 2 , 1993 LOCATION: New City Hall, 129 Holmes Street South Mayor Gary Laurent presiding 1] Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M. 2] Approval of Agenda 3] Recess for H.R.A. Meeting 4] Re-convene 5] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 6] Mayor's Report 7] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 8] Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. ) 9] Approval of the Minutes: None 10] Communications: 11] Public Hearing on an appeal by John Clark of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals decision to uphold a staff interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance regarding the use of a mobile home structure in the Racetrack Zoning District, Appeal Resolution No. CC-653 12] Boards and Commissions: Community Development Commission: *a] Star City One Year and Three Year Work Plans 13] Reports from Staff: a] Second Avenue Parking Lot - Parking Plan b] Request to Bid Aerial Platform Apparatus c] County Trunk Highway 18 Roadway Width Between CR-16 and CR-42 d] Application for Premises Permit - Shakopee VFW e] Alley Grader f] High Pressure Sewer Jetter *g] Hiring of Accountant/Research Analyst TENTATIVE AGENDA March 2 , 1993 Page -2- 13] Reports from Staff continued: *h] 1993 Set Up Licenses i] Hiring of Prosecutorial Help j ] Zoning Ordinance Proposals k] Disbursement of City Funds *1] Approve Bills in the Amount of $251, 105. 51 14] Resolutions and Ordinances: *a] Res. No. 3751 - Increasing the Size of the Fire Dept. *b] Res. No. 3752 - Approving Plans & Specs for TH 101/169, State Project 7005-60 (101=187) - TH-169 Bridge & Mini Bypass c] Res. No. 3753 - Accepting Report and Ordering A Public Hearing for 1993 Reconstruction Projects *d] Res. No. 3754 - Approving Plans & Specs for Stage 3 of the Bloomington Ferry Bridge *e] Res. No. 3755 - Amending the Shakopee Valley Square PUD *f] Res. No. 3750 - Apportioning Special Assessments for Meadows 8th Addition *g] Res. No. 3743 - Approving Premises Permit for Lions Club 15] Other Business: a] b] c] 16] Recess for an executive session to discuss litigation and property acquisition 17] Re-convene 18] Adjourn to Tuesday, March 16, 1993 at 7 : 00 P.M. Dennis R. Kraft City Administrator MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items DATE: February 26, 1993 1 . Attached is correspondence from Dick Underferth, Chair of the Scott County Board of Commissioners to Mr. James Kephart regarding his reappointment to the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Board. 2 . Attached are the January 20th, and February 17th, 1993 minutes of the Scott County Economic Development Coalition. 3 . Attached is information regarding the Benedictine Health System agreeing to affiliation of St. Francis Regional Medical Center with Healthspan. 4 . Attached is the calendar of Upcoming Meetings for March. 5. Attached is the Business Update from City Hall for March. 6. Attached is the Police Newsletter for Council review. 7 . Attached are the February 22 , 1993 minutes of the Cable Communications Advisory Commission. 8 . Attached are the February 22 , 1993 minutes of the Shakopee Public Access Corporation. 9 . Attached are the February 17 , 1993 minutes of the Community Development Commission. 10 . Attached are the February 4 , 1993 minutes of the Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment & Appeals meetings. 11 . Attached are the March 4 , 1993 agendas for Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment & Appeals. 12 . Attached is memo from the Finance Director regarding Payable 1993 Tax Rates. SCOTT COUNTY .:_Y:_. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS COURTHOUSE 109 428 S. HOLMES ST. - '` - SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1382 (612)496-8100 (612)496-8180 FAX RALPH T.MALI,District 1 WILMA E.BEHM,District 2 RAY FOSLID,District 3 DICK UNDERFERTH,District 4 ED MACKIE,District 5 February 8, 1993 Mr. James Kephart 1064 Ramsey Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mr. Kephart: On behalf of the Scott County Board of Commissioners, I wish to send you official notice of your reappointment to the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Board for a three-year term effective March 22, 1993, through March 22, 1996. On the recommendation of the City of Shakopee, the Jackson Town Board and Commissioner Foslid based on your past service, this reappointment was made at the February 2, 1993, meeting of the County Board. Thank you for your contributions in the past and for your continuing interest in serving Scott County in this advisory capacity. \cerely, ( d( )J:. 2. -za//1(-- Dick Underferth Chairman /jfh c: Commissioner Foslid Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Judy Cox, City Clerk, Shakopee Rose Menke, Clerk, Jackson Township Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources File: Lower Minnesota River Watershed District An Equal Opportunity IAf f irmatiue Action Employer OFFICIAL MINUTES OF THE SCOTT COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COALITION FEBRUARY 17, 1993 Members in attendance: Barry Stock, John Breitbach, Kay n and Lewis,s John Heald, Jon Albinson, Kevin Haugen, Kay Anderson. Other present: Mark Luhman and Eugene Goddard. The 20th meeting of the SCEDC was called to order at 8 : 00 a.m. on February 17 , 1993 in the Council Chambers of the Prior Lake City Hall. I. Approved minutes of the January 20, 1993 SCEDC meeting. Mr. Albinson noted that there were two corrections to the minutes. He stated that Valley Green Park is currently working on three projects. Construction is not presently underway as the minutes currently imply. He also stated that he thought Mr. Stock was going to accompany him to the NCIOP convention in Minneapolis and not Ms. Kuhlman. Kuhlman/Albinson moved to approve the minutes of the January 20, 1993 as amended. Motion carried unanimously with Ken Anderson abstaining. II. Treasurer's Report. John Breitbach reported that the Coalition' s account had $1, 573 . 70 as of February 15, 1993 . He also noted that there were 3 outstanding bills due for advertising in the Scott County Economic Development Coalition. The Treasurer' s Report was accepted. III. Update on SBA Activity_. Mr. Anderson reported that there are currently no SBA projects in Scott County being considered by Twin Cities Metro Development Coalition. IV. Updates on Development Activity in Scott County_. The Committee members shared information on projects that are currently underway or being proposed in their community. V. Economic Resource Profile. Mr. Stock shared with the members present a copy of the distribution plan for the Economic Development Profile. He noted that the distribution plan identifies who has currently received copies and who is eligible to receive copies. VI. Economic Development Day. Mr. Stock noted that the Coalition Marketing Committee met last week to prepare a list of items that needed to be prepared for the upcoming Economic Development Day to be held at Mystic Lake Casino on May 21, 1993 . Discussion ensued on the mailing list. Mr. Albinson stated that he would be willing to share his mailing list of brokers and developers with the Coalition. Mr. Stock also suggested that each Coalition member begin preparing a list of potential business prospects who they feel might bm telt'fit f ro0 m the event. It was suggested that app invitations be printed for the event. Discussion ensued on the design for the invitation. Mr. Albinson thought Arlyn Stwyer from Mystic Lake stated that they might be able to provide assistance in the design. Mr. Stock stated that he would attempt to get Ms. Stwyer to the next Marketing Committee meeting. Discussion also ensued on including some type of token in the invitation that could be used as a premium item to attract interest in the event. Mr. Breitbach stated that he would discuss this with Nick Koutsikas from Mystic Lake who is in charge of marketing. Discussion ensued on the idea of developing a folder that could be distributed to all attendee's. The folder would include the economic development profile and business assistance flyer. The folder could also include advertisements from various sponsors. Discussion ensued on the ad layout and cost for business/sponsor ads. It was the consensus of the group to simply include a sponsor list in the folder with sponsorships to be sold at a rate of $50 . 00 . Each member of the Coalition would be expected to contact potential business sponsors in their community. Mr. Breitbach suggested that a expense voucher be developed that could be utilized to secure sponsorships. Ms. Lewis also suggested that a news release be sent to all the Chamber of Commerce's in Scott County to inform potential business sponsors of the opportunity. Discussion ensued on the format of the event. Mr. Stock stated that he would provide some comments regarding the Coalition purpose and general economic development comments regarding the Scott County area and the affiliation with the Twin Cities Metro. Mr. Stock stated that he would also introduce the speaker (Mr. Jim McCoomb, McCoomb and Associates) . Discussion ensued on whether or not it would be appropriate to place an ad in the Real Estate Journal. It was the consensus of the group that an ad in the Real Estate Journal (quarter page) would be a good idea. Discussion ensued on whether or not loan packager's might be interested in attending the event. It was suggested that loan packaging firms (BDS, Hoffineyer and Smith) be included on the mailing list and contacted for potential sponsorship. VII. Next Meeting. The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, March 17th at 8 : 00 a.m. in the Prior Lake City Council Chambers. VIII.Other Business. Discussion ensued on whether or not it would be appropriate to move the May meeting date oeearlier for the in the month so that final details can be put together Economic Development Day. It was the consensus of the group tthat the May meeting will be held on Wednesday, y 12 , at 8 : 00 a.m. rather than the regularly scheduled date. IX. Adiournment. The meeting adjourned at 9 : 15 a.m. 01( SCOTT COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COALITION MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 20, 1993 Members in Attendance: Barry Stock, Randy Kruger, John Breitbach, Kay Louis, John Heald, Jon Albinson, Colleen Winter, Jim Parsons, Kevin Haugen, Kay Kuhlmann, Mark Luhmann. Others Present: Nat Wisser, Jim Morris. The nineteenth meeting of the SCEDC was called to order at 8 :00 a.m. on January 20, 1993 in the Council chambers of the Prior Lake City Hall. I , Approve Minutes of the December 16 . 1992 SCEDC Meeting MOTION BY JON ALBINSON, SECONDED BY RANDY KRUGER, TO APPROVE THE DECEMBER 16, 1992 MEETING MINUTES AS WRITTEN. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. II . Treasurer' s Report acco John toBreitbach $85reported .07 e asthat of the January Coalition' s 1993 .unt The ada Treasurer' s Report was accepted. III , Tconomic Resource Profile The Board congratulated Barry Stock on the successful outcome of the resource profile effort, and thanked him for a job well done. IV. Economic Development Day Jim McComb, a market analyst of McComb & Associates, will be the featured speaker. May 21st is the scheduled date. Admission will be $10 per person. 1 The event will run from 11 : 00 a.m. to 2 :00 p.m. , and is targeted at commercial/industrial development (not residential) . There can be tours of individual communities. MN Valley Transit can provide a free mini- bus. The invitation should solicit tour registration, with confirmation at the door. A tour of Mystic Lake should be included. Each community will have a booth set in a half circle. Kruger suggested the Scott Co. Transportation Coalition have a booth. Stock volunteered to arrange that with John Westlake. Utilities like NSP and MVEC will be invited to have displays. Mystic Lake and Scott Co. Extension may also have booths. Bob Heck could have information on the SBA 504 program. Gene Goddard from MN TED could have a booth. There could be a sponsor sheet with ads sold. Each member organization will pay the admission charge for local persons it wishes to invite. Stwyer volunteered to help with design/production on a brochure for the event. V. Up-date on SBA Activity No report. VI . State Economic Development Activities No report. VII . Development Activity in Scott County - Shakopee Valley Green has over 1 . 7 millio sq. ft. in three p . Nordic industrial distribution projects Track may buy the Canterbury print shop. The Super 8 motel is expanding, as is the prison. A school expansion is under referendum. The EAW has been approved for the new hospital. The City is buying 65 acres south of the senior high for park, community center; 35 acres will be set aside for school expansion. The new City Hall will be opening soon. Albinson commented that commercial- industrial taxespay ofythe% of bestthe C/Itax taxbill,basesathat Shakopee has in MN 2 Belle Emma Krumbee' s is expanding. Belle Plaine State Bank Plaine is providing 5155, 000 in SBA 7a financing to the new Bridgeman' s between Belle Plaine and Jordan. Prior The new Business-Office Park is targeted at business Lake owners who live in Prior Lake. It is for businesses with fewer than 120 employees. The City wanted to fill 2 .5 acres a year, but demand is such that they will likely fill the 20+ acre Park in two years. They are using TIF; break-even will be about $0 . 67 . City tax rates have fallen in the last 5 years. There is no preliminary plat yet for the Wilds. The new County Market grocery store is about to open. Mdewakaton The addition to Mystic Lake casino will be bigger Community than the existing casino. There will be offices, retail, gaming, stages, 2 restaurants - and no alcohol. The pilings will be 26 ' deep! Savage There is about $2 million in commercial construction under way, including the Sun Ridge Clinic. There have been 405 houses built, averaging a $100, 000 permit value, and $135,000 sale value. New Prague There is a new Subway, and new meat market, pet store, furniture store, and landscaper in town. VIII . Next Meeting The next meeting will be on Wednesday, Feb. 17 at 8 : 00 a.m. in the Prior Lake city council chambers . IX. Other Business Winter and Louis are interested in setting up seminars on Starting a Small Business; this will be included in the 1993 Work Plan. Albinson offered to let the SCEDC use volunteered to1s wobooth the booth.e NCIOP convention; Its April 7th from 3 : 00 t 7 :30. X. Adjournment gcc.kC The meeting adjourned at 9 : 15 a.m. 3 RCV B":5- FRANC:5 REQ MED C-R; 2-22-93 ; 2:41PM ; 12167202373-, SHAKOPEE MN;# 2 #3 BHS Benedictine Health System 503 EAST THIRD STREET • DULUTH, MINNESOTA 55805 • (218) 720-2370 SPONSORED BY me St8TCRS Or ST.SCHOLASriCA PRIORY YM(2I ) 720.2373 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 23, 1993 CONTACT: Janis Kivela Hooey Director of Communications Benedictine Health System Duluth, MN 55805 (218)720.2375 BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM AGREES TO AFFILIATION OF ST. FRANCIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER WITH HEALTHSPAN Duluth, Minn. - The Benedictine Health System, at a meeting of its Board of Directors on Feb. 20, agreed to develop a letter of intent to pursue a partnership with HealthSpan in the ownership and operation of St. Francis Regional Medical Center, Shakopee, said Sister Kathleen Hofer, chief executive officer of the Benedictine Health System (BHS). BHS entertained two proposals for affiliation with St.Francis, one from HealthSpan and a joint proposal from Fairview Health System, Methodist Hospital, and Park Nicollet Medical Center. "HealthSpan's proposal more completely met our established criteria for affiliation," Hofer said. 'The Benedictine Health System is committed to maintaining its presence in the greater Twin Cities metropolitan area, and sees the collaboration with HealthSpan as a positive step to achieving this goal." -more- RCV Bv;S- FRANC:S REG MEC C-R; 2-12-93 ;12:00PM ; 12187202373-► SHAKOPEE MN;# 5 St. Francis - add 1 BHS will immediately develop a letter of intent and begin working with HealthSpan to formalize details regarding the affiliation, "We will work to strengthen the already important role St. Francis plays in providing health care in the Minnesota Valley," Hofer said. In addition to St. Francis, BHS is the parent corporation to five facilities in Minnesota; St, Mary's Medical Center, Polinsky Medical Rehabilitation Center, and the Benedictine Health Center in Duluth; St.Joseph's Medical Center, Brainerd; and St.Mary's Regional Health Center, Detroit Lakes. BHS also owns and operates St. Mary's Hospital in Cottonwood, Idaho, and six long term care facilities in North and South Dakota, BHS is the health care corporation established in 1985 by the Benedictine Sisters Benevolent Association of Duluth. HealthSpan,based in Minneapolis,is the largest health care corporation in Minnesota with more than 16,000 employees and 16 facilities across the upper Midwest. In the Twin Cities,HealthSpan owns and operates Abbott Northwestern Hospital,Sister Kenny Institute, and Phillips Eye Institute, Minneapolis; Mercy Hospital, Coon Rapids; Unity Hospital, Fridley; and United Hospital, St, Paul. -30- h q March h 1 9 9 3 Upcoming Meetings SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SRT 11 2 3 14 5 5 4:30pm Public 7:OOpm City 7:30pm Planning Utilities Council Commission 7:OOpm Committee of the Whole 1.-11—i 8 9 10 11 12 13 i.----a14 15 16 17 18 19 20 j 7:OOpm City 5:30pm CDC 1 Council 7:OOpm Energy and Transportation 1 :l S ,y 22 23 24 25 26 27 7:OOpm Park & 8:30pm Recreation Committee of the Whole 28 29 30 31 i April February SMTWTFS SMTWTFS 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 28 25 26 27 28 29 30 02/17/1993 * s BUSINESS UPDATE FROM CITY HALL Vol. 7 No. 3 Dear Chamber Member: March 1, 1993 Administration On February 6, 1993 the Shakopee City Hall moved available from Scott County in 1993 to off-set costs associated with a Spring Recyclable Material to its new location at 129 Holmes Street South. Collection Day. The event will be scheduled for The new facility is a great improvement over the early May and will take place behind the Public old facility and one the residents and business Works building on Gorman Street. community of Shakopee can be proud of. The new facility includes a state of the art Council Chambers that is equipped with a complete audio Park and Recreation video system. The City has also activated the Government Public Access Channel. (Channel 12) This channel will be used to inform residents of On February 16, 1993 the Shakopee City Council upcoming events and to broadcast City Council approved Resolution No. 3747. Said resolution and Planning Commission meetings. You should transfers the duties and responsibilities formally notice a significant improvement in the broadcast held by the Community Youth Building quality as compared to our former set-up. An Committee to the Shakopee Park and Recreation open house is being planned for some time in Advisory Board. Mr. Ed Dressen will be assisting March. We hope to see you there. the City in scheduling the facility through August 31,1993. After that time, Recreation Department staff will be responsible for all scheduling. The resolution also sets forth that community youth Community Development groups and senior citizens will continue to have free access to the community youth building for The Valley Ice Arena analysis is now complete. meeting purposes. On March 1, 1993 the consultants involved in completing the study will present their findings to Plans and specifications are being prepared for the City Council. The report indicates that two sheets Tahpah Park concession stand remodeling project. of ice could be supported in Scott County given The proposed project will include remodeling the existing market conditions. The report also concession area, building a third covered wing, analyzes several options in terms of an ice facility. and complete reconstruction of the restrooms to increase capacity and comply with ADA On February 16, 1993 the Shakopee City Council Standards. A March bid letting is being planned authorized the appropriate City officials to submit with project completion scheduled for sometime in an application for funding to Scott County for a June. The project is being funded with assistance Spring Recyclable Material Collection Day. It from the Shakopee Jaycees. appears that there will be approximately $5,000 Plans and specifications are also being prepared for improvements to the municipal pool. The Planning Commission also recommended Improvements will include reconfiguring the approval of the Preliminary Plat for the chlorination system and repairs to the diving well Milwaukee Manor Planned Unit Development and perimeter curbing. The repairs to the diving and the Final Plat for Milwaukee Manor 1st well will hopefully reduce the amount of water Addition to the City Council. The Preliminary Plat leaking out of the pool. This should in turn have covers 9.91 acres and is located east of Market a positive effect on water temperature. Street and north of 7th Avenue. With the 1st Improvements are also being planned for the Addition, there are 32 mid-density residential lots restrooms to comply with ADA Standards and the proposed to be final-platted. concession area. Safety and health related improvements are receiving top priority for The Planning Commission also recommended to funding this year. Additional funding will be the City Council the approval of the Final Plat for proposed in the 1994 budgeting process to cover Valley Park 11th Addition. This proposed plat ADA related improvements not completed in 1993 covers over 72 acres, and consists of 3 industrial and badly needed aesthetic improvements. The lots. It is located south of Valley Industrial majority of the pool improvements should be Boulevard South, west of Valley Park Drive, and completed in early May. This year marks the 25th north of 12th Avenue. anniversary of the pool. Planning Public Works The City Council recently ordered a feasibility At their meeting on February 4, 1993,the Shakopee Boardreport on upgrading McKenna Road by adding of Adjustment and Appeals denied an pavement to this road, as a result of a request for appeal of staff's interpretation of the Zoning the Shakopee Mdewakanton Community. The Ordinance's definition of mobile homes in the Community has offered to participate in the cost Racetrack Zoning District. The applicant proposed of this project because of the impacts the proposed to use the mobile home structure for storage community center will have on this road and purposes. negotiations on the specific cost participation are At their meeting on February 4, 1993,the Shakopee underway. Planning Commission opened the public hearing On February 16, 1993 the City Council ordered the regarding an application from St. Francis improvements to Minnesota Street 7th Avenue Regional Medical Center to rezone a 60 acre site north to the alley and the alley from Market St. to from an Agriculture Preserve (AG)Zoning District Dakota St. and the alley and also reconstruction a to Highway Business (B-1). The Planning portion of Dakota St. Commission continued the public hearing and tabled their recommendation to the City Council, The City Council authorized the Public Works requesting that staff and the applicant submit Department to purchase a new International additional information for review. dump truck through the low bidder of the Hennepin County Purchasing Program. At this same meeting, the Planning Commission also recommended approval of three plats to the City Council. The Commission recommended approval of both the Preliminary and Final Plat for Century Plaza Square 4th Addition. This proposed plat is located on the southwest corner of 4th Avenue and County Road 17 and consists of two commercial lots. ri OFFICIAL MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE CABLE COMMUNICATION ADVISORY COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 22 , 1993 Chairman Anderson called the meeting to order at 7 : 00 p.m. with Commissioners Moonen, Bastyr, Anderson and Scannell present. Commissioner Harrison and Zeigler were absent. Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator; Bill Lepley and Paul Rien, New Frontier Productions were also present. Bastyr/Scannell moved to approve the minutes of the December 7 , 1992 meeting as kept. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock shared with the Committee a copy of the 1993 Cable Budget. Mr. Stock noted that City Council did allocate $30, 000. 00 in professional services to offset costs associated with running the public access studio and government access channel. These funds will be received by the Public Access Corporation in 1993 . Discussion ensued on the Amzak complaint resolution notification. Mr. Stock noted that the proposed complaint resolution notification will be sent to all Shakopee subscribers in conjunction with the April cable billing. Mr. Anderson stated that this should give Shakopee residents an indication of who to contact if they are experiencing problems with the cable company. Commissioner Scannell noted that he thought it would be appropriate for the cable company to supply the City with a list of complaints on a monthly basis. Mr. Stock stated that he felt it would be difficult to get an accurate list from the cable operator. He did note that when a complaint is registered with the Better Business Bureau the City receives notification. Since Mr. Stock has been working for the City of Shakopee he can only remember two complaints that have gone to the Better Business Bureau for a response. Mr. Anderson stated that the Cable Commission many years ago established a complaint procedure. The complaint resolution notification will provide Shakopee residents with an idea of who to contact from the City if they are experiencing a problem. It was the consensus of the Commission that the complaint resolution notification procedure would provide the Cable Commission with the information they need to determine if a major problem exists with the cable operator. Discussion ensued on the 1992 Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act. Mr. Stock stated that he felt it would be at least 6 months before the FCC adopted rules pertaining to the act. He stated that he would keep the Commission up to date as rules are adopted. Mr. Anderson questioned whether or not the cable operator has implemented a basic tier of service. Mr. Stock stated that the cable company does have a basic tier that provides access to twelve (12) channels. The cost for the channel includes a one time installation fee of $99 . 00 . There is also a monthly cost associated with the basic service. Moonen/Bastyr moved to adjourn the meeting at 7 : 20 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC ACCESS CORPORATION REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 23 , 1993 Chairman Bastyr called the meeting to order at 7 : 21 p.m. with Commissioners Moonen, Bastyr, Anderson and Scannell. Commissioners Zeigler and Harrison were absent. Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator, Bill Lepley and Paul Rien, New Frontier Productions were also present. Anderson/Moonen moved to approve the minutes of the December 7 , 1992 meeting as kept. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion ensued on staffing the government access channel. Mr. Anderson stated that last year when he approached the City Council with a request to pass on 90% of the franchise fees to the Access Corporation he stated that the Access Corporation would take on the responsibility for staffing the government access channel and cover future equipment needs associated with the government access channel. Mr. Anderson wanted to make it clear that his commitment to support government access staffing on behalf of the Public Access Corporation only included staffing those meetings that were presently being broadcast when the commitment was made. (City Council and Planning Commission meetings. ) Discussion ensued on staffing alternatives. Mr. Bastyr stated that he felt it would be most practical to simply amend the agreement with New Frontier Productions that provides staffing for the public access studio. Mr. Lepley stated that he would be willing to accept an amendment to the public access studio agreement to include staffing the government access channel. Discussion ensued on how New Frontier Productions would be compensated for their staffing services. It was the consensus of the Corporation that the City Council and Planning Commission meetings generally require about 20 hours of staffing per month. It was the consensus of the Corporation to guarantee the contractor 20 hours per month. Discussion ensued on the compensation rate. Mr. Lepley stated that if an amendment to the public access agreement is reached he would propose to staff the City Council and Planning Commission meetings with adults. He felt that in order to obtain quality programming and consistency he would need to offer a wage of approximately $8 . 00 per hour. When overhead costs for benefits and taxes are included a rate of $12 . 00 per hour would be realistic in his opinion. Mr. Anderson stated that it is somewhat of a difficult task for one person to run the entire broadcasting. A person with experience and consistency in staffing would be important. Mr. Stock stated that last fall he met with the Treasurer to prepare a 1993 budget. The 1993 budget set aside approximately $1, 700. 00 for government access staffing. If a rate of $12 . 00 per hour is applied to the guaranteed 20 hour per month standard, approximately $2 , 400. 00 would be needed to cover government access staffing for the remainder of 1993 . Mr. Stock stated that the 1993 budget does include several variables primarily in the area of capital Official Proceedings of the February 23 , 1993 Shakopee Public Access Corporation Page -2- equipment which would provide enough room to cover the proposed $12 . 00 per hour rate. Moonen/Anderson moved to amend the agreement with New Frontier Productions to include a provision for government access staffing guaranteeing 20 hours per month at a rate of $12 . 00 per hour effective March 1, 1993 for the purpose of broadcasting City Council and Planning Commission meetings as needed. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Moonen stated that the contractor should submit a time sheet documenting time spent for each meeting broadcast. This information can be reviewed at year end to determine if the contract should be amended in 1994 . Discussion ensued on the compensation rate for public access set forth in the New Frontier contract. Mr. Stock stated that over a year ago, Mr. Lepley requested that the contract be reopened to provide for adjustment in compensation. Mr. Stock stated that New Frontier Productions has not received an increase in their service contract rate sine it was originally accepted in 1986. Mr. Anderson stated that he felt it was more than reasonable to amend New Frontier Productions contract to provide for a rate adjustment. Mr. Stock stated that the contract has been in existence for approximately 6 years. If you assume an annual inflation rate of approximately 3% an 18% increase in compensation would be appropriate. Discussion ensued. It was the consensus of the Commission to amend the contract with New Frontier Productions to provide a 15% increase in compensation effective March 1, 1993 . Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock stated that he has been contacted by staff from Scott County regarding broadcasting the County Board meetings. Mr. Stock stated that Scott County Board staff is seeking technical and possibly staffing assistance to broadcast their meetings. Mr. Stock noted the County Board meets every Tuesday at 9 : 00 a.m. He went on to state that they are not planning on changing their meeting schedules. Mr. Anderson stated that he felt it would be difficult to provide staffing assistance for the County Board meetings. He suggested that a letter be drafted that could be sent to the Scott County board indicating possible alternatives for staffing. Mr. Moonen stated that the County Board could certainly enter into an agreement with New Frontier Productions to provide staffing of the County board meetings. Mr. Moonen concurred with Mr. Anderson stating that he did not feel it was appropriate or even possible for the Shakopee Public Access Corporation to provide staffing. A possible scenario would be to have the Access Corporation enter into an agreement with the County Board and amend New Frontier Productions agreement to provide staffing for the public access. However, Mr. Moonen felt it would be much cleaner if the County Board would simply contract directly with New Official Proceedings of the February 23 , 1993 Shakopee Public Access Corporation Page -3- Frontier Productions or some other contractor to provide staffing. Mr. Anderson stated that he felt the Access Corporation could assist in making sure that tape delayed broadcasts are placed on the government access and public access channels. It was the consensus of the Corporation to send a letter to the Scott County Board indicating the avenues of assistance that the Shakopee Public Access Corporation could provide. Discussion ensued on the public access survey. It was the consensus of the group that the survey should be distributed. Mr. Lepley will provide Mr. Stock with a list of public access users. The Access Corporation will also provide funding for a return addressed stamped envelope and funding for the initial mailing. Mr. Anderson stated that he would get a final draft of the survey to Mr. Stock within the next week. Mr. Lepley stated that he would get the address labels to Mr. Stock by March 15, 1993 . The survey should be returned to the City of Shakopee. Discussion ensued on having a user appreciation night. The purpose of the appreciation night would be two-fold: First to thank those persons who have developed new programming and also to solicit comments regarding equipment needs and overall operational issues relating to the public access studio. It was the consensus of the group that this type of event should be planned for April. Mr. Lepley stated that he would put together several options for the Access Corporation to consider in terms of the appreciation night format. Discussion ensued on public access and/or government access equipment issues. Mr. Lepley stated that he felt it would be beneficial to have a wireless mic incorporated into the City Hall broadcast system. This mic would be useful for the City Engineer and/or Planner who frequently moves from the table to a chart to make a presentation. Cost for a telex wireless remote is approximately $550. 00 . The Corporation agreed to authorize Mr. Lepley to purchase the wireless mic system. Mr. Lepley also stated that a personal audio monitor should be installed in the Council Chambers control room. This would provide the camera operator with the ability to hear in greater detail what is going on in the actual Council Chambers. Mr. Lepley stated that this could be done for approximately $300. 00. It was the consensus of the Corporation to allocate $300. 00 for a personal audio monitor in the City Council Chambers control room. Mr. Lepley stated that it would be nice to have some type of tint placed on the window in the Council Chambers video control room. At the present time the persons in the Council Chambers can look directly into the audio control room. There is also a glare on the window when a camera shot is being taken from the front of the Council Chambers to the back. Mr. Stock stated that he felt this Official Proceedings of the February 23 , 1993 Shakopee Public Access Corporation Page -4- item might be covered in the City Hall overall project budget. He stated that he would investigate getting the window tinted with some type of smoke mesh. Finally, Mr. Lepley stated that he would like to do some minor rewiring of the control room in the Council Chambers. He stated that the wiring currently installed does not gel with the diagram lay out provided by the audio/video installers. Mr. Moonen stated that he felt Mr. Lepley should contact the audio/video installers to make sure that the wiring relates to the wiring diagram. Mr. Anderson concurred. He stated that if the audio/video installer will not do the rewiring he would like this item brought back to the Public Access Corporation prior to any rewiring. Anderson/Moonen moved to adjourn the meeting at 8: 45 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. 4-1E9 OFFICIAL PROCEEDING OF THE SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 17, 1993 The meeting was called to order at 5: 30 p.m. with the following members present: Albinson, Miller, VanHorn, Unseth, Dirks, Phillips and Brandmire. Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator was also present. Miller/Unseth moved to approve the minutes of the December 16, 1992 meeting as kept. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock gave a brief economic development update. He noted that the prison is doing a major expansion with ground breaking expected for this spring. Mr. Stock also reported that the Valley Ice Arena Analysis should be completed within the next five (5) days. A Committee of the Whole meeting will be scheduled for March 1, 1993 to discuss this issue in greater detail. Mr. Stock also noted that negotiations are currently under way for the property south of the Senior High School. The City is currently looking at acquiring approximately 57 acres with 30 acres to be sold to the School District. Mr. Stock also noted that the appraisal for the former Pelham Hotel site has been completed and negotiations are under way for acquisition. Discussion ensued on the possibility of developing a city newsletter. Mr. Stock stated that there are several options available to the City in terms of completing a newsletter. He shared with the Committee several alternative ways of approaching a newsletter that are being utilized by surrounding communities. He went on to state that the primary costs involved in completing the newsletter are staffing, mailing and printing. Design is also a factor that must be taken into consideration. Mr. Stock stated that the City of Savage contracts with a private individual who provides production services and typesetting. The Savage newsletter includes advertisements. The individual under contract is responsible for selling the ads and keeps all ad proceeds. The City contributes approximately $10, 000 . 00 per year to the contractor. Chaska contracts with a graphic arts firm who provides layout and typesetting services. The City prepares the majority of the stories for inclusion in the newsletter with editorial review by the contractor. The design cost is approximately $75. 00 per page. This of course does not include printing and mailing. Mr. Stock stated that the City of Prior Lake produces their newsletter in house. All stories are provided by staff. Layout, typesetting and printing are provided by a local printer. Prior Lake annually budgets approximately $10, 000. 00 for their quarterly newsletter. Mr. Stock stated that the Recreational Department presently co- sponsors a brochure with the Shakopee Community Education. The brochure is distributed to every household in Shakopee on three Official Proceedings of the February 17, 1993 Shakopee Community Development Commission Page -2- different occasions annually. The brochure is printed on newsprint. Mailing costs and production costs are split equally between the two jurisdictions. The current cost to the City to participate in the brochure is approximately $33 . 48 per page. Given the budget limitations and time constraints, Mr. Stock stated that he felt it would be best to pursue expansion of the Community Education/Recreation brochure. He stated that a section of this brochure could be dedicated to City issues. We could incorporate topics from the monthly updates from City Hall to be included in the brochure. Costs would be minimal for this type of service. Mr. Miller stated that he felt the City should embark on a free standing newsletter that could be directly distributed to each household independent of other information. Mr. Miller questioned how the Chamber of Commerce produced their newsletter. Ms. Dirks stated that the Chamber newsletter is produced by Chamber of Commerce staff with printing completed by a local printer. Mr. Stock noted that one of the primary cost factors involved in distributing a newsletter are the mailing costs. He stated that with bulk rate mail it would still cost approximately $1, 500. 00 to reach every household in the community per issue. Mr. Stock went on to state that the 1993 budget did not include funds for a City newsletter. Mr. Albinson stated that he thought staffs proposed approach wold at least get the ball moving in terms of a City newsletter. He thought that it would be appropriate to recommend to City Council that funding be included in the 1994 budget for a free standing City newsletter. He hoped that at least one issue of the recreation brochure could be completed prior to budget time to show City Council what could be accomplished. Mr. Miller stated that he feared that if we participated in the Recreation brochure that the information would get lost and that over time staff would not pursue a free standing newsletter. Brandmire/Unseth moved to request staff to produce a City newsletter in conjunction with the Community Education/Recreation brochure and that funding be included in the 1994 budget for a free standing City newsletter. Motion carried with Commissioner Miller opposed. Discussion ensued on the Star City One Year Economic Development Plan. Mr. Miller stated that the City newsletter option discussed should be included in goal number 3 . Miller/Phillips moved to approve the 1993 One Year Economic Development Plan as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion ensued on the Three Year Economic Development Plan. Commissioner Dirks questioned whether or not the plan to contact at least one existing Shakopee business per month should be carried Official Proceedings of the February 17, 1993 Shakopee Community Development Commission Page -3- forward in 1994 and 1995 . Mr. Stock responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Albinson stated that the titles on the pages noted that the plan was the five year work plan and not the three year work plan. Mr. Stock stated that this should be changed. Miller/Vanhorn moved to approve the Three Year Economic Development Plan as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion ensued on the Downtown Rehab Grant Program. Mr. Stock stated that for the past several years the Community Development Commission has requested the Shakopee HRA to continue the Downtown Rehab Grant Program. Mr. Stock stated that there are several persons interested in participating in the Rehab Grant Program this year. He requested the CDC to recommend to the HRA that the program be continued in 1993 . Mr. Stock stated that the 1993 HRA budget did allocate $25, 000. 00 for this program. It was the consensus of the Committee that the Downtown Rehab Grant Program should be continued. Discussion ensued regarding the relatively slow activity surrounding the program. Mr. Albinson stated that many of the downtown property owners are continuing to wait and see what impact the mini by-pass will have on their property prior to investing dollars in their buildings. VanHorn/Miller moved to recommend to the Shakopee HRA that the Downtown Rehab Grant Program be continued in 1993 . Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Albinson gave a brief report from the Transportation Coalition. He stated that funding for the Bloomington Ferry Bridge has been included in the Governors Budget but that the bridge completion date will probably be pushed back to 1996. He stated that the southerly bypass completion date has also been pushed back to 1996. Mr. Stock gave a brief Scott County Economic Development Coalition report. He noted that the Economic Development Coalition is planning on a Economic Development Day at Mystic Lake on Friday, May 21, 1993 . Developer's, Broker's and business prospects interested in Scott County will be invited to this event. Mr. Stock gave a brief report on the mini by-pass projects enhancements that were included in the downtown redevelopment study which was completed by the CDC several months ago. Mr. Stock stated that several meetings have been held between MnDOT officials and staff and they are working on incorporating several of the enhancements into the mini by-pass project. He stated that he would report back at the next meeting with further information. Discussion ensued on the status of the old City Hall facility. Mr. Stock stated that the City is interested in leasing the space. Ms. Dirks questioned the impact of ADA on leasing the facility. Ms. Dirks stated that if the lessor employs 20 employees or less and there are no building improvements on the site the City would not incur any liability in bringing the building up to ADA standards. Official Proceedings of the February 17, 1993 Shakopee Community Development Commission Page -4- It was the consensus of the Committee that this issue should be looked into in greater detail and that the possibility of a small business incubator program be investigated for the former City Hall facility. It was the consensus of the Committee that staff investigate the possibility of the City' s acquisition of the shoe shop building across the street from City Hall. The building is presently boarded up and presents an eye sore to the downtown area. Mr. Stock stated that he would place this item on the next agenda for further discussion. Mr. Stock noted that in March it would also be appropriate to include the election of officers as an agenda item. VanHorn/Miller moved to adjourn the meeting at 7 : 10 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. 4 10 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Session Shakopee, Minnesota February 4 , 1993 MEMBERS PRESENT: Christensen, Zak, Spurrier, Mars, Kelly, Madigan MEMBERS ABSENT: Joos STAFF PRESENT: Lindberg Ekola, City Planner Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant Planner Nancy Deziel, Recording Secretary I. ROLL CALL Vice Chairman Mars called the meeting to order at 8 : 00 p.m. The roll call was taken as noted above. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A discussion of the Comprehensive Plan was added to the agenda as No. 11.C. under Other Business at the request of Commissioner Spurrier. Also added to the agenda as No. 11.D. under Other Business was a discussion on the East Shakopee Transportation Plan as requested by staff. III. APPROVAL OF THE JANUARY 7, 1993, MEETING MINUTES The minutes were approved as presented with Commissioner Mars abstaining. IV. RECOGNITION OF INTERESTED CITIZENS Vice Chairman Mars recognized anyone in the audience wishing to speak on any item not on the agenda. There was no response. V. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER THE REZONING FROM AGRICULTURAL (HE) TO EAST SIDEAY BUSINESS (B-1)OF COUNTY RD. 17 OF APROXIMATELYRCEL 1/ 2 MILE SOUTH ED ON THESOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF VIERLING DR. AND COUNTY RD. 17 . Vice Chairman Mars opened the public hearing to consider the rezoning from Agricultural (Ag) to Highway Business (B-i) of a 60 acre parcel located on the east side of County Rd. 17 , approximately 1/2 mile south of the intersection of Vierling Dr. and County Rd. 17 . The City Planner stated that the City has received an application for rezoning for the proposed St. Francis Regional Medical Center. It is zoned Agriculture (AG) , and is located on the east side of CR 17 , approximately 1/2 mile south of the Minutes of the Page - 2 Shakopee Planning Commission February 4, 1993 intersection of Vierling Dr. and CR 17. The applicants are requesting that it be rezoned to Highway Business (B-1) . He stated an essential step for the project was taken last year when the Comprehensive Plan was amended to allow for the expansion of the Metropolitan Service Area for this area. The land use plan in the document identified that institutional uses should be guided for this area. The hospital site covers 60 acres and 70 acres of expansion of the Urban Service Area was allowed. The City Planner stated that a Comprehensive Plan is a document that helps establish the general location of land uses in the City. Typical land uses are residential, commercial, industrial, public, and institutional. The zoning ordinance is the legal means in which a Comprehensive Plan is put into place or implemented. Currently the zoning ordinance does not adequately address the type of uses that are proposed for the St. Francis Regional Medical Center. The various uses of this property would include the hospital, medical office spaces, some retail for the medical items, and goods as well as potentially at some time in the future residential uses. At this point in time there is not one zoning district in the City's Zoning Ordinance or City Code that would allow these types of uses to occur on one property. There are several different alternatives to try to implement the direction established in the Comprehensive Plan. One alternative would be to create a new "Institutional" zoning district. A second would be to rezone the property to B-1 and amend the B-1 district to permit the uses proposed by St. Francis. A third alternative would be to rezone the property to R-4 and amend the R-4 district to permit the uses proposed by St. Francis. A fourth alternative would be to require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for any of the underlying zoning district alternatives. In addition to the underlying zoning methods, the Planning Commission could recommend that a Planned Unit Development (PUD) concept be utilized. The PUD concept provides for more creativity and flexibility in the site plan review process for both the City and a developer. The PUD concept has been successfully used to review complex projects in the City such as the Stonebrooke development. He stated City staff has contracted various communities in the surrounding area in terms of trying to understand how they're approaching the zoning administration for large institutional uses including Burnsville for Fairview Ridges, Apple Valley, Robinsdale, and several other metropolitan communities. Minutes of thePage - 3 February 4, 1993 Shakopee Planning Commission The City Planner stated that staff would recommend that the Planning Commission offer a motion to continue the public hearing to the March meeting and request staff to obtain additional information for the review of this rezoning request. Vice Chairman Mars stated concern over taking a piece of land for institutional use and slowing the growth probability there by making it only accessory to the hospital. Commissioner Spurrier stated concern over making it institutional because he feels that it would decentralize the community. He stated he hopes an additional study would address the issue of an institutional zone competing with the existing core of the community. Commissioner Kelly stated that he liked the layout of Fairview Ridges Hospital in Burnsville and that maybe they should check to see how that was done. Vice Chairman Mars asked if a representative for the St. Francis Hospital would like to step forward and address the Commission. Don Lieberman, President of the St. Francis Hospital, stated that he wanted the commissioners to be aware that it is important that the zoning get resolved some time in early March and that it go to the City Council in March. He stated that his conversations with the City Planner indicated that it would be possible. He stated that they do have some other transactions depending upon having the appropriate zoning in that area. Mr. Lieberman gave a presentation of their plan and explained what type of facilities and services they envision as part of the medical campus. The City Planner gave an overview of the City of Shakopee and its growth pattern and explained how the hospital would fit into the context of the growth in the future. Commissioner Spurrier stated concern for an institutional zone and stated he feels with the time limit involved it's questionable as to what kind of a job would be done. Vice Chairman Mars asked if anyone in the audience would like to comment on the issue. There was no response. Motion: Commissioner Madigan/Spurrier moved to offer a motion to continue the public hearing to the March 1993 meeting and table the recommendation to the City Council, requesting that Minutes of the Page - 4 Shakopee Planning Commission February 4, 1993 staff and the applicant submit additional information for review. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. VI. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF CENTURY PLAZA SOUARE 4TH ADDITION. Vice Chairman Mars opened the public hearing to consider an application for the preliminary and final plat of Century Plaza Square 4th Addition, located in the southwest corner of Marschall Rd. (CR 17) and 4th Ave. (CR 16) . The Assistant Planner stated that Mr. Cletus Link has submitted applications for concurrent preliminary and final plat approval for Century Plaza Square 4th Addition. The proposed subdivision is located in the southwest corner of Marschall Rd. and 4th Avenue. The area is zoned Community Business, B-2 . The proposed plat covers 4 . 53 acres, and consists of two lots. The proposed Century Plaza Square 4th Addition would be a replat of Outlot A of Century Plaza Square 2nd Addition. There are two streets adjacent to the proposed 4th Addition. Fourth Avenue, or CR 16, is along the north side of the proposed plat; and along the east side of the proposed plat is Marschall Rd. , or CR 17. She stated that 4th Ave. is designated as a collector street. The Comprehensive Plan requires a right-of-way width of 80' . A condition has been recommended which requires the additional 7 feet of right-of-way dedication. The Assistant Planner stated that staff is recommending approval of the preliminary and final plats for Century Plaza Square 4th Addition, subject to the 8 conditions discussed in the staff report. Vice Chairman Mars asked if there were any questions of staff. Discussion was held regarding the current widths and the proposed widths of the street involved. Vice Chairman Mars asked if the applicant would like to step forward. Mr. Cletus Link, 1216 Jefferson Street, stated that he did have a problem with the 7 foot requirement on 4th Avenue and the sidewalk requirement. He questioned why the one area on Minutes of the Page - 5 February 4, 1993 Shakopee Planning Commission CR 17 , between 4th Avenue and CR 16 (as it extends to the west of CR 17) , is required to give all the extra right-of-way. The City Planner stated that a final plat is a window of opportunity for the City to consider right-of-way width. Mr. Link stated that he wanted to point out that when you take another 7 feet of land it affects his setback requirement and he may have to come in for variances. He also stated that back in 1986 there was Eagle Creek 2nd Addition Plat. If there was such a real concern about traffic at the time there was when they took his land, why didn't they require a 10 foot strip of land on Eagle Creek 2nd Addition which joins CR 17? The City Planner stated that staff and engineers, as well as commissions have changed since then and probably the City didn't have a good enough vision with the county as to what those right-of-way widths needed to be back at that time. Mr. Link stated that he feels that this one subdivision in this particular area has been singled out from the rest of the development from up and down CR 17 to 1st Avenue to 10th Avenue. Commissioner Spurrier stated that the hundred foot corridor through the segment was considered adequate and needed only to 4th Avenue, because they raised the issue of right-of-way and the point that was made then was there were turn lanes needed for northbound CR 17 at 4th Avenue but evidently no need for a dedicated lane on the other side. The conclusion was that the right-of-way was adequate because they were looking at the adequacy of that site to accommodate that density, and the report they received then was that the corridor on the north side of 4th Avenue was adequate. That the hundred foot corridor was needed on the south side and they couldn't really take exception with the traffic engineer's conclusion there. He stated that he knows the goal on collector streets is to result in an 80 foot right-of-way width and put in sidewalk facility. He stated that part of the reason for all the right-of-way dedication in this subdivision is that this subdivision parallels the CR 17 corridor more than any other subdivision. There is a hundred foot right-of-way out by the school and the new subdivisions on the south side of 10th Avenue and all dedicated a hundred feet. If the dedication north of 10th Ave. is less than a hundred feet, its no doubt due to the fact that at the time the City purchased that right-of-way, they did a lot of their improvement in a very conservative cost conscious fashion and the purchase of surplus right-of-way for the future was not always the prime consideration. Minutes of the Page - 6 Shakopee Planning Commission February 4, 1993 Discussion was held about the reasons for the requirement to install a sidewalk on 4th Avenue and the need to be consistent in the future. Discussion was held about a sidewalk plan, who is responsible, and who bears the cost for the implementation of a sidewalk. Vice Chairman Mars asked if anyone in the audience would like to speak to the issue. There was no response. Motion: Commissioner Kelly/Spurrier moved to close the public hearing. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Commissioner Kelly/Christensen moved to offer a motion recommending to the City Council the approval of the preliminary and final plat for Century Plaza Square 4th Addition, subject to the eight conditions outlined in the staff report. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. VII. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF MILWAUKEE MANOR. Vice Chrmn. Mars opened the public hearing to consider the preliminary and final plat of Milwaukee Manor, located east of Market St. and north of 7th Ave. The City Planner stated that Mr. LeRoy Menke has submitted an application for approval of the Preliminary Plat for the Milwaukee Manor subdivision and the Final Plat for Milwaukee Manor 1st Addition. He stated the applicant is proposing to final plat all of the land east of Dakota Street and the northern portion of the area west of Dakota Street within the Milwaukee Manor PUD. The City Planner stated that staff is recommending approval of the preliminary and final plats subject to 18 conditions. He stated that one of the conditions that will receive some additional discussion has to do with the park dedication fee. He stated that they determined the total park dedication fee for the entire subdivision to be $15, 797 . 15 based on the recent sale value formula in the City Code. He stated the applicant is requesting a 40% credit based on Section 11. 40, which would allow for a credit of up to 40% if 5 criteria are met. The Planning Commission needs to review those criteria and make a recommendation to the City Council on that 40% credit request. Minutes of the Page - 7 February 4, 1993 Shakopee Planning Commission The City Planner stated that if you were to take 40% of the $15,797 , the credit would be approximately $6300. The resulting park dedication fee after the 40% credit would be $9400 approximately and would be divided by the 55 dwelling units on the project. This would result in a $172 approximate park dedication fee for each unit. The applicant would also need to request a deferment on the park dedication requirement. Discussion was held on whether Mr. Menke met the 5 conditions that would entitle him to the 40% credit. Vice Chrmn. Mars asked if there were any questions from commissioners for staff. There were none. Vice Chrmn. Mars asked the applicant, LeRoy Menke, to step forward. LeRoy Menke, 1185 Shumway, stated that there were some things that he needs to get together with the City Engineer about. Discussion was held about the location of the recreation center. Vice Chrmn. Mars asked if there were any questions for Mr. Menke. There were none. Vice Chrmn. Mars asked if anyone in the audience would like to come forward and speak to this issue. There was no response. Motion: Comm. Spurrier/Madigan moved to close the public hearing. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Motion: Comm. Zak/Kelly moved to offer a motion recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat for Milwaukee Manor, subject to conditions, and move its approval; and offer a motion recommending approval of the Final Plat for Milwaukee Manor 1st Addition, subject to conditions. Vice Chrmn. Mars asked for any discussion. There was none. Motion: Comm. Zak/Kelly moved that they recommend the 40% credit as an amendment to the original motion. Vice Chrmn. Mars asked for a vote on the amendment to the motion. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Minutes of the Page - 8 Shakopee Planning Commission February 4, 1993 Vice Chrmn. Mars asked for a vote on the original motion. Vote: Motion carried 5 to 1 with Comm. Christensen voting against the motion. VIII.FINAL PLAT: TO CONSIDER THE FINAL PLAT OF VALLEY PARK 11TH ADDN. , LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 12TH AVE. AND VALLEY PARK DR. The Assistant Planner stated that Mr. Jon Albinson, of Valley Green Business Park Limited Partnership, has submitted an application for approval of the Final Plat for Valley Park 11th Addition. The proposed subdivision is located south of Valley Industrial Boulevard South, west of Valley Park Drive, and north of 12th Avenue. The area is zoned I-2 , Heavy Industrial. The proposed plat covers 72 acres, and consists of 3 industrial lots. She stated that access to the development is from Valley Park Drive and 12th Avenue. The dedication of the connecting street shown in the preliminary plat was not included in the final plat for Valley Park 10th Addition. The proposed street would have exceeded the maximum length of 500 feet permitted by the Subdivision Regulations. The Assistant Planner stated that to avoid an over-length cul- de-sac, approximately 1, 000 feet of the proposed street was platted as Outlot C instead of being dedicated as a public street. Dedication of the street could occur when the property to the south was final platted and an over-length cul-de-sac could be avoided. Consideration No. 9 in the staff report discussed park dedication requirements. Since the writing of the staff report, legal council has advised staff that park dedication fees for the proposed lots cannot be required because all 3 of the lots are over 5 acres in size. Therefore, staff is recommending that recommended condition No. 2G be deleted from the recommendation. She stated that staff is recommending approval of the Final Plat for Valley Park 11th Addition subject to the 7 conditions discussed in the staff report, but deleting recommended condition No. 2G. Discussion was held on whether park dedication fees could be required once the lots become smaller than 5 acres in size. Comm. Spurrier expressed concern over the lack of corner cuts at the intersection of Park Place and Track D and additional right-of-way dedication. Minutes of the Page - 9 February 4, 1993 Shakopee Planning Commission Vice Chrmn. Mars asked the applicant to step forward. Jon Albinson, Valley Green Business Park, told Comm. Spurrier that it was just an oversight on his part and that he would have his surveyor take a look at that and put in radius corners. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Zak moved to offer a motion recommending to the City Council the approval of the Final Plat of Valley Park 11th Addition, subject to conditions, eliminating 2G as recommended by staff. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. IX. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PRIVATE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT. Vice Chrmn. Mars opened the public hearing to consider an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a private wastewater treatment plant located at 800 West 1st Ave. Vice Chrmn. Mars stated that in front of them was a request for a withdrawal of that application. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Zak offered a motion accepting the withdrawal of the application for a Conditional Use Permit from Rahr Malting Company for an industrial wastewater treatment plant for direct discharge into the Minnesota River. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. X. DISCUSSION: DALE DAHLRE WISHES TO DISCUSS THE FEASIBILITY OF REZONING THE EASTERLY 10 ACRES OF THE HIGHWAY BUSINESS (B-1) DISTRICT LYING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MARSCHALL RD. AND VIERLING DR. TO URBAN RESIDENTIAL (R-2) • Vice Chrmn. Mars commended Mr. Dahlke for bringing his plans to the Planning Commission and allowing their input before any final decisions were made. The City Planner stated that Mr. Dahlke has submitted a letter requesting the Planning Commission's consideration in rezoning property north of Vierling Drive and east of Marschall Road (C.R. 17) . The subject site is 18 acres in size and is currently zoned Highway Business (B-1) . Mr. Dahlke would like the Planning Commission to consider rezoning the eastern 10 acres of this site from B-i to Urban Residential (R-2) . Vice Chrmn. Mars asked the applicant, Dale Dahlke, to step forward. Minutes of the Page -10 Shakopee Planning Commission February 4, 1993 Dale Dahlke, 1279 Limestone Dr. , gave a presentation of his plans and ideas for the property. Discussion was held by the Commissioners and Mr. Dahlke about the different ways that Mr. Dahlke could develop his property. XIa. OTHER BIISINESS: 1992 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS AND PLANNING COMMISSION. The City Planner stated that the action requested is to recommend to the City Council approval of the annual report. This is required by ordinance that all boards and commissions report to the Council. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Spurrier moved to recommend to City Council approval of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals Commission and Shakopee Planning Commission 1992 Annual Reports. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. XIb. OTHER BIISINESS: ELECTION OF 1993 OFFICERS. Vice Chrmn. Mars stated that since a full board was not present, they should wait until next month to hold the elections. Motion: Comm. Madigan/Christensen moved that they postpone the election of the 1993 officers until the next meeting. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. XIc. OTHER BIISINESS: DISCUSSION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Comm. Spurrier expressed concern over other jurisdictions making plans for this community without being sensitive to this community's Comprehensive Plan. The City Planner stated that one way to address Comm. Spurrier's concern and also to tie in agenda No. 11d. would be to hold a special meeting where they could discuss the East Shakopee Transportation Plan. A tentative meeting was set for March 18th. Motion: Comm. Zak offered a motion to reconsider the motion to offer Appeal Resolution No. 653 , A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, which states that the Board of Adjustment and Appeals affirms the City Administrator's interpretation of Section 11. 05, Subd. 8, that mobile home Minutes of the Page -11 February 4, 1993 Shakopee Planning Commission structures are permitted as a Conditional Use within thatthe Agricultural and Rural Residential Zoning Districts only, are not permitted within the RTD for use as storage structures, and that a mobile home structure does not meet the definition of an agricultural building as defined in State Statute 6W stated uld li e tore-vote on that moti n bsomeone second hebecause he was not happy with the way he voted earlier. Discussion was held on whether or not to allow Mr. Clark to use the mobile home structure for storage purposes. Motion failed due to lack of a second. XII. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10: 50 p.m. 3. OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Regular Session Shakopee, Minnesota February 4 , 1993 MEMBERS PRESENT: Christensen, Zak, Spurrier, Mars, Kelly, Madigan MEMBERS ABSENT: Joos STAFF PRESENT: Lindberg Ekola, City Planner Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant Planner Nancy Deziel, Recording Secretary I. ROLL CALL Chrmn. Mars called the meeting to order at 7 : 30 p.m. Roll call was taken as noted above. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. III. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 7, 1993, MEETING MINUTES The meeting minutes were approved as presented with Chrmn. Mars abstaining. IV. RECOGNITION OF INTERESTED CITIZENS Chrmn. Mars recognized anyone in the audience wishing to speak on any item not on the agenda. There was no response. V. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AN APPEAL TO THE STAFF'S INTERPRETATION OF THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE'S DEFINITION OF MOBILE HOMES IN THE RACETRACK DISTRICT. Chrmn. Mars opened the public hearing to consider an appeal to the staff's interpretation of the City Zoning Ordinance's definition of mobile homes in the Racetrack District. The applicant wishes to use the structure for storage at 2100 Eagle Creek Blvd. The Assistant Planner stated that Mr. John Clark is appealing the interpretation of section 11. 05, Subd. 8, Mobile Homes. At the January 7, 1993 , meeting, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals continued the public hearing regarding this application to allow staff and the applicant to present additional information. At the request of the Planning Commission, staff conducted a site inspection on January 20th. Copies of photographs of both the interior and exterior of the mobile home structure were taken and attached to the staff reports. Many of the photographs were taken from C.R. 16 so that the Planning AMmutes of the Page - 2 Board of Adjustments and Appeal February 4, 1993 Commissioners could see the visibility of the structure from the road. The mobile home structure that is under discussion measures 12 ' by 60' , and was manufactured in 1981. It has steps and a deck leading to the entrance door. There are no kitchen or bath facilities, and there is no plumbing connected to the structure. A furnace is attached to the exterior of the structure. However, it was not operating during the site inspection. She stated that State Statute 16B. 60, Definitions, State Building Code, which was adopted by reference by the City of Shakopee, defines an agricultural building as a structure on agricultural land designed, constructed, and used to house farm implements. Mobile homes were designed and constructed for residential use. Based on the State's definition of an agricultural building, it is staff's opinion that the subject structure does not appear to meet the definition in that it was not designed and constructed to house farm implements, livestock, or products. She stated that staff is recommending that the Planning Commission uphold the interpretation of the City Administrator and to inform the applicant that he has up to 90 days to remove the mobile home structure from the site. The four reasons for this recommendation are provided in the staff report. The Assistant Planner stated that if the applicant wishes to design and construct an agricultural building, staff would suggest that the applicant apply for the Administrative Waiver from the PUD approval process and submit a site plan verifying compliance with the ordinance requirements. Chrmn. Mars asked if there were any questions by the Commissioners of staff. Comm. Spurrier asked if the City has received any complaints. The Assistant Planner replied, no, that they have not. Chrmn. Mars asked staff if they viewed it as a building code issue, or a zoning issue. The Assistant Planner stated that the applicant is appealing PP PP the interpretation of a portion of the zoning ordinance. Chrmn. Mars asked if there were any more questions of staff: There were none. Chrmn. Mars asked if the applicant or their representative would like to step forward. Minutes of the Page - 3 Board of Adjustments and Appeal February 4,1993 Gene Hauer, 2088 Howard Trail, stated that he is the owner of the land and that John Clark rents from him. Mr. Hauer stated that they just wanted to go on a temporary basis year to year. He stated that if someone wanted to develop the land then they would go. He stated that the storage building didn't bother him and that he didn't think you could see it from the road. Chrmn. Mars asked Mr. Hauer what would happen at the end of the year. Mr. Hauer replied that if the City said he couldn't renew it, then out it would go. Chrmn. Mars asked if there were any further questions of the Commissioners of the applicant. There were none. Chrmn. Mars asked if anyone in the audience would like to speak to the issue either for or against. There was no response. Motion: Comm. Zak/Christensen moved to close the public hearing. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Comm. Christensen asked if it was true that you couldn't have a mobile home structure for agricultural storage in an RTD District but that you could have a mobile home structure for agricultural storage in an Ag District. The City Planner stated that the use of a mobile home structure for agricultural storage in an Ag district is not the question to be concerned with at this time. He stated that the Commissioners need to look at the issue from a zoning perspective and look at the provisions in the RTD District. Comm. Christensen asked why the mobile home was allowed on the property in the first place. The City Planner stated that a mobile home structure is allowed for living purposes to allow for extended families who work on the family farm. He stated that it is still subject to conditions and issued on a temporary basis. Comm. Spurrier asked if it would make any difference if it were an over the road type trailer as opposed to a mobile home type trailer. The City Planner stated that he thinks an over the road type Moults of the Page - 4 Board of Adjustments and Appeal February4, 19'93 trailer would be different, but it is something they would have to look into. Motion: Comm. Christensen/Madigan moved to offer Appeal Resolution No. 653 , A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, which states that the Board of Adjustment and Appeals affirms the City Administrator's interpretation of Section 11. 05, Subd. 8, that mobile home structures are permitted as a Conditional Use within the Agricultural and Rural Residential Zoning Districts only, that are not permitted within the RTD for use as storage structures, and that a mobile home structure does not meet the definition of an agricultural building as defined in State Statute 16B. 60, and move its adoption. Motion: Comm. Spurrier/Zak moved to amend the motion moving from a 90 day removal deadline to a June 15th deadline. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Chrmn. Mars stated they would now vote on the motion with the amendment. Vote: Motion carried 4 to 2 with Comm. Mars and Kelly voting against the motion. Comm. Spurrier stated that he regretted voting on this issue and he feels that it wouldn't have been an issue if the farm had been located anywhere else in the City. He stated that he feels they need to be concerned about any rules they have that place burdensome restrictions on farms in the community. Chrmn. Mars reminded everyone of the 7 day appeal process in which anyone would have 7 days to appeal the decision to the City Council. VI. OTHER BUSINESS: ELECTION OF 1993 OFFICERS Motion: Comm. Spurrier/Zak moved to hold the election following the business items of the Planning Commission. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT The Board of Adjustment and Appeals adjourned at 8 : 10 p.m. TENTATIVE AGENDA PLANNING COMNIISSION Regular Session Shakopee, MN March 4 , 1993 Chairperson Terry Joos Presiding 1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of Agenda 3 . Approval of the February 4, 1993 , Meeting Minutes 4 . Recognition by Planning Commission of Interested Citizens. 5 . 7 : 40 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider amending Conditional Use Permit No. 376 to allow expanded hours for a mining operations located west of CR 83 , south of CR 16 and north of Valley View Rd. Applicant: NBZ Enterprises, Inc. Action: Amend Conditional Use Permit No. 376 6 . 7 : 50 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider the rezoning of a 60 acre parcel located on the east side of CR 17 , approximately 1/2 mile south of the intersection of Vierling Dr. and CR 17 . Applicant: St. Francis Regional Medical Center 7 . 8 : 00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the rezoning of the easterly 10 acres of an 18 acre parcel located on the east side of CR 17 and north of Vierling Dr. Applicant: Dale Dahlke 8 . 8 : 10 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an amendment to the Stonebrooke Planned Unit Development and the preliminary plat of Stonebrooke 2nd Addition, located south of CR 78, east of CR 79 and west of Timber Trails Addition. Applicant: Laurent Builders 9 . Other Business A. Election of Officers 10 . Adjourn Lindberg S. Ekola City Planner NOTE TO PLANNING MEMBERS: 1. If you have any questions or need additional information on any of the above items, please call Terrie or Aggie on the Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting at 445-3650. 2 . If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting. TENTATIVE AGENDA BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Regular Session Shakopee, MN March 4, 1993 Chairperson William Mars Presiding 1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of Agenda 3 . Approval of February 4, 1993 , Meeting Minutes 4 . Recognition by Board of Adjustment and Appeals of Interested Citizens. 5. 7 : 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for a variance to the regulations regarding acceptable building materials at 800 West First Ave. Applicant: Rahr Malting Co. Action: Resolution No. 654 6. Other Business a. Election of Officers b. NOTE TO THE B.O.A.A. MEMBERS: 1. If you have any questions or need additional information on any of the above items, please call Terrie or Aggie on the Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting. 2 . If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting. TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Payable 1993 Tax Rates DATE: February 26, 1993 Attached for Council information is the pay 1993 and 1992 tax rates for Scott County jurisdictions. NET TAX CAPACITY AND RATES PAYABLE IN 1993 COUNTY OF SCOTT, MINNESOTA TAX CAPACITY TAX CAPACITY CITIES: **VALUATIONS RATE SCHOOLS: **VALUATIONS RATE BELLE PLAINE 1 ,041 ,146 27.994 BURNSVILLE 6,825,808 70 .021 ELKO 97,446 36.624 LAKEVILLE 2,109,511 68.831 JORDAN 947,303 30 .883 BLOOMINGTON 186,121 51 .251 NEW MARKET 83,474 46.996 LESUEUR/ 23,821 67.827 NEW PRAGUE 965,679 53.506 HENDERSON 10,089 53.372 PRIOR LAKE 5,696,371 29.656 BELLE PLAINE 1 ,585,583 58.298 RURAL 21 .889 JORDAN 2,539,806 51 .631 PRIOR LAKE IV 853,695 29.220 PRIOR LAKE 9,760,820 50.116 SAVAGE 1 ,519,281 29.026 SHAKOPEE 15,180,011 61 .499 SAVAGE II 5,862,081 29.026 NEW PRAGUE 2,902,860 52.554 SHAKOPEE 14,669,065 28. 162 RURAL 14.081 SPECIAL DISI : - -- -- HRA (SHAK) 14,669,065 .269 HRA (EX SHAK) 26,455,365 .2.80 TOWNSHIPS: MET COUNCIL 40, 158,751 .435 MOS° CONTROL 41 , 124,430 .347 BELLE PLAINE 409,363 2.616 MET TRANSIT BP FIRE 314,024 3.949 DISTRICT 28,600,493 3.004 " JON FIRE 7,094 3.721 *AREA 11 ,558,258 .274 NP FIRE 88,245 3.004 LO MN WATER 17,388,390 .438 W/M/0 SOUTH WEST 164,160 PL-SL WATER 7,644,398 2.215 W/M/0 SAND CR 245,203 E:LAKELEY 242,025 14.420 CEDAR LAKE IMP 250,090 1 .124 CEDAR LAKE 991 ,785 11 .278 REG 9 DEV 965,679 .219 NP FIRE 761 ,435 2.414 REG R/R AUTH 41 ,124,4 30 .289 - NM FIRE 230,350 3.080 CREDIT RIVER 1 ,669,407 7.905 COUNTY 41 ,124,430 45.564 HELENA 688,504 8.736 JDN FIRE 160 ,578 3.407 NP FIRE 527,926 2.250 *************** JACKSON 529,538 6.344 * * Sh 1C9oa� LOUISVILLE 655,896 3.056 * NOTES NEW MARKET 1 ,417,316 12.200 * * 701A/ / °•° 7 W/M/O 1 ,001 ,637 .181 *************** CR WATER 113,281 .465 SC WATER 302,398 .311 SAND CREEK 757,760 9.494 * COUNTY EXCEPT PRIOR LAKE, ST LAWRENCE 228,474 12.081 SAVAGE, SHAKOPEE, NEW PRAGUE BP FIRE 106,457 3.603 ** VALUES ARE NET TAX CAPACITIES JDN FIRE 122,017 3.288 UNADJUSTED FROM TABLE IV SPRING LAKE 1 ,798,821 7.604 FOR TOTAL RATE ADD: COUNTY, CITY OR TOWNSHIP, SCHOOL PLUS FIRE AND SPECIAL DISTRICT APPLICABLE. SATE= PA'rA21 E IN 19r NET T�;t. �::,FF�.I Tr AND l� . � - CCOUNT'r OF. SCOTT, MINNESOTA ''`'' CAPACITY _ -.�, . .-2 =;-.,r:7(. n _-'CC .Gi, ,. • , A-. _Nr: R4 T; .,x .,-;1=5 •• E 1 ,:142,57,'' . 27.074 RUF\r'� ; ` _ I E t ,6,:,-,2S9' 96,99" 43.8°1 LSP._ 1 . 921 , :7C :9 . 227 JO::C$-:1 . - JO:Cr-:1 ? 7,4,:1 2-.477 BL _�ESU + , 62.3 .R , 1 . ., , _ =- Z, S��l 3:3. 152 Lt'= NE PFA.L_'E 978.265 41 .699 BELLE PLT:._ i } 16 . 9=: ::: - 5 c7 1 27.-0- .JiiFEAN 64. ::3 . , �:,�lra,3 � �: r 20 ,458 PRIOR LAKE =,S51 ,468 �,:,361 ='RI _.. LAKE IV 357, 34 27.%7 SHAKOPEE 15,07' .906 66.508 -::::AS_ 1 ,541 ,930 22 435 NEW PRAGUE 7',c==.1.-74q-- SAi,'At' I : 5,366 ,810 ?3.dS5 HEwDERSCN 1 . , 0 50 .390 3HAKCPEE 14,634,316 23.979 F.2FAL 12.319 SPECIAL DIST: FORA (SPAK' 14,624,.316 .283- HRA (EX SHAK) 25,303,712 .207 TCI:2HIPS: MET COUNCIL 39,95 ,76- .661 MOSO CONTROL 38,959,759 ,12;"- 2ELLE PLA I NE 387,6'6 3.266 MET TRANSIT BP FIRE 293,923 3.959 DISTRICT 23,076,901 1 .3E•4 - t JON FIRE7,223 3.569 *AREA ,0 ,��-82'�! -36 3 .171 -- W,"/0 171 - '•!P FIRE 86,420 3. 140 LO MN WATER i ; ,1-"?,'_`'ll ^ W ,., ,_ 150 ,432 .091 FL-SL WATER 7,4.2-,327 .S0.3 E:LAKELEY 244,746 13.545 CEDAR LAKE IMP 272,243 1 .013 CEDAR LAKE 956,938 10 .018 REG 9 DE) 979.'65 .243 NP FIRE 40 ,a0�� 1 .975 REQ. r_'R AUTO _',9":82,034 .091 - 7 VM FIRE 216,185 2.517 CREDIT RIVER 1 ,553,629 7.726 COUNT' 39,92,3,024 41 .339 HELENA 667,003 7.350 JE:N FIRE 142,065 3.414 NP FIRE 524,938 2.365 W/1/0 516,941 .11444******4**#*4-4, x�„e� JACK2CN 535,207 6.066 * * ok NOTES 3 I_�zL!I�'-'IEEE 639,646 3.337 # 7o?i4•/ �3.�. NEW MARKET 1 ,275,325 11 .144 * * W/M/0 907,107 .202 *************** CR WATER 103,742 .298 �. -1 - i--7 7 SC. WATER 264,476 . 182 SAND CREEK 694,416 8.650 * COUNTY ECCEPT PRIOR LAKE, ST LAWRENCE 216,852 11 .149 SAVAGE, SHAKOPEE, NEW PRAGUE BP FIRE 101 ,278 3.718 ** VALUES ARE NET TAX CAPACITIES JDN FIRE 115,574 2.834 UNADJUSTED FROM TABLE IV W/h1/O 216,852 .187 SPRING LAKE 1 ,540 ,474 9. 100 FOR TOTAL RATE ADD: COUNTY, CITY OR TCIZISHIP, SCHOOL PLUS FIRE AND SPECIAL DISTRICT APPLICABLE. TENTATIVE AGENDA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting March 2, 1993 1. Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M. 2 . Approval of February 2 , 1993 Minutes 3 . Downtown Rehab Grant Program Continuation 4 . Other -Avsiness a) ' b) 5. Adjourn Dennis R. Kraft Executive Director OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Reg. Session Shakopee, Minnesota February 2 , 1993 Cncl. Beard called the meeting to order at 8 : 09 PM with Cncl. Vierling, Lynch, Sweeney and Mayor Laurent present. Also present: Dennis R. Kraft, Executive Director; Karen Marty, City Attorney; Barry Stock, Asst City Administrator; and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk. Vierling/Lynch moved to approve the January 5, 1993 Minutes. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Lynch moved to authorize the appropriate HRA officals to execute the First Amendment to Payment to the Assurance and Security Agreement by and between Ladbrooke Racing, Canterbury Inc. and the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kraft `'s?tated that the Scott County H.R.A. wanted to meet with the Shakopee H.R.A. informally to discuss general housing issues. Mr. Kraft suggested that the H.R.A. meet as a Committee of the Whole. Cncl. Sweeney suggested finding out more information as to what the proposed meeting will consist of. His concern was that the County H.R.A. is into housing and the Shakopee H.R.A. is not and would not be interested in the housing business. H.R.A. decided to have Mr. Kraft contact the County H.R.A. to discuss what the meeting will be about and let the County know that the Shakopee H.R.A. is willing to meet with them in a regular Committee of the Whole meeting. Sweeney/Vierling moved to adjourn the meeting at 8 : 19 PM. Motion carried unanimously. Dennis R. Kraft Executive Director Debra Zabel Recording Secretary MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Downtown Rehab Grant Program Continuation DATE: February 24 , 1993 INTRODUCTION: For the past several years, the Shakopee HRA has annually taken action to effectuate the continuation of the Downtown Rehab Grant Program. It would be appropriate at this time to determine if the program should be continued in 1993 . BACKGROUND: Approximately four years ago the Shakopee HRA established a Downtown Rehab Grant Program. The rehab grant program provides businesses with the B-3 zoning district with the opportunity to receive funding assistance to repair and improve exterior building conditions. The program provides a 25% grant to those persons meeting the program guidelines. Last year we only had one property owner participate in the Downtown Rehab Grant Program. (Roof repairs) However, since the programs inception six businesses have utilized the program. On Wednesday, February 17, 1993 the Shakopee Community Development Commission discussed whether or not the program should be continued in its present form or amended. It was the consensus of the Commission members that the program should be continued. Within the last month, I have received inquiries from two prospects who are looking to utilize the program in 1993 . The 1993 HRA Budget did allocate $25, 000 for the rehab grant program. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Move to continue the Downtown Rehab Grant Program in 1993 . 2 . Amend the rehab grant program guidelines and continue the program in 1993 . 3 . Do not continue the rehab grant program in 1993 . 4 . Table action pending further information from staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1 . ACTION REQUESTED: Move to continue the Downtown Rehab Grant Program in 1993 . 1/ MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner RE: Appeal the Decision of the City Administrator - Mr. John Clark DATE: February 24 , 1993 INTRODUCTION: The Board of Adjustment and Appeals has reviewed an application for an Appeal of an Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance submitted by Mr. John Clark. Mr. Clark is appealing the interpretation of Section 11. 05, Subd. 8, which regulates mobile homes. At February 4th meeting, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals moved to uphold the interpretation of the City Administrator and informed the applicant that the mobile home structure must be removed from the site by June 15, 1993 . BACKGROUND: The applicant moved a mobile home structure onto his place of residence at 2100 Eagle Creek Boulevard. He is renting the farm building site from Mr. Eugene Hauer. The subject site is 1. 6 acres in size. It is located within the Racetrack District (RTD) and within the Mandatory Planned Unit Development (PUD) area. (See Exhibit A. ) The site is currently being used for agricultural purposes. Agriculture is a non-conforming use of the land within the RTD. A non-conforming use is defined in Section 11. 02 as, "Any use of land, buildings, or structures lawfully existing on the effective date of this Chapter which does not comply with all the regulations of this Chapter or any amendments hereto governing the zoning district in which such use is located" . The structure was brought to staff's attention by Shakopee Public Utilities (SPUC) . The applicant had requested that electrical service be provided to the structure, and SPUC questioned whether the mobile home structure had received an approved Building Permit. Staff determined that a Building Permit had not been approved r the structure, and a letter was written to the applicant on November 25, 1992 , informing him that permits are required to move in or construct any building within the City of Shakopee. After becoming informed that building permits are required, the applicant submitted an Application for a Building Permit for the mobile home structure, and indicated that it would be used as a "storage trailer" , and not as living quarters. The applicant informed staff that this structure was intended to be used as a storage structure for seed and small tractor parts. On December 1, 1992 , another letter was written to the applicant stating that the Zoning Ordinance does not permit mobile home struct res lthinfthe RTD. The applicant submitted an application interpretation of Section 11. 05, Subd. 8 of the City Code. DISCUSSION: Staff conducted a site inspection on January 20, 1993 . The subject site is currently being utilized for agricultural uses. Exhibit A illustrates the property ownership pattern and zoning. Exhibit B is a copy of a letter from Mr. Clark. Copies of photographs of both the interior and exterior of the mobile home structure have been attached to this staff report. (Exhibit C. ) Many of these photographs were taken from C.R. 16 so that the Board of Adjustment and Appeals could see the visibility of the structure from this road. A number of residential homes are located along the bluff to the south of C.R. 16. The mobile home structure that is under discussion measures 12 ' by 60' in size, and was manufactured in 1981. It has steps and a deck leading to the entrance door. There are no kitchen or bath facilities, and there is no plumbing connected to the structure. A furnace is attached to the exterior of the structure. However, it was not operating during the site inspection. State Statute 16B. 60, Definitions, State Building Code, which was adopted by reference by the City of Shakopee, defines an agricultural building as the following: "a structure on agricultural land as defined in section 273 . 13 , subd. 23 , designed, constructed, and used to house farm implements, livestock, or agricultural produce or products used by the owner, lessee, and sublessee of the building and members of their immediate families, their employees, and persons engaged in the pickup or delivery of agricultural produce or products" . Mobile homes were not originally "designed and constructed to house farm implements" . They were designed and constructed for residential use. Based on the State's definition of an agricultural building it is staff's opinion that the subject structure does not appear to meet the definition in that it was not designed and constructed to house farm implements, livestock or products. The structure is only being used to house agricultural items. Therefore, the mobile home structure should be removed from the site. The applicant is in need of additional tool and equipment storage space. Currently there are several agricultural buildings on the site which have been designed and constructed to house agricultural items. The PUD ordinance allows the construction of agricultural structures in the RTD. Section 11. 40, Subd. 7 .C, Administrative Waiver, states that the City Administrator hasdiscretionhe process to fto waive the Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval adoption of a PUD when the following condition is met: "i. Properties Located within a Mandatory PUD Area. Properties which have not previously gone through the PUD platting process will not be required to submit a PUD when it functions as an existing agricultural operation or when the following conditions are met: (a) The changes in the building location or size do not affect more than 10% of the site area and/or floor space. (b) The changes in landscaping, parking, and drive arrangement, or site improvements do not affect more than 10% of the site area. (c) The changes comply with all requirements placed on the zone in which the property is located. If the applicant were to obtain an Administrative Waiver from the City Administrator, he may be able to obtain a building permit to construct an accessory structure for agricultural storage purposes. However, this waiver could not provide approval to move a mobile home structure into the RTD. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Uphold the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals and affirm the interpretation of the City Administrator, requiring the applicant to remove the mobile home structure from the site by June 15, 1993 . 2 . Interpret the City Code so as to allow mobile home structures to be used for storage facilities within the RTD. 3 . Continue the public hearing to allow the applicant or staff to provide additional information. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS RECOMMENDATION: The Board of Adjustment and Appeals recommends Alternative No. 1, to uphold the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals and affirm the interpretation of the City Administrator, requiring the applicant to remove the mobile home structure from the site by June 15, 1993 , for the following reasons: 1. The subject site is located within the Racetrack Zoning District (RTD) . The approval of this appeal would permit mobile home structures to be used as storage structures within the RTD. 2 . Section 11. 36, Racetrack District (RTD) regulations, does not list mobile home structures as either a Permitted nor a Conditional Use within this Zoning District. 3 . Section 11. 05, Subd. 8 states that mobile home structures are permitted as a Conditional Use within the Agricultural and Rural Residential Zoning Districts only. 4 . State Statute 16 .B. 60 defines agricultural buildings as structures designed, constructed and used to house agricultural items. The mobile home structure was not designed and constructed to house agricultural items. If the applicant wishes to design and construct an agricultural building, staff would suggest that the applicant apply for the Administrative Waiver from the PUD approval process and submit a site plan verifying compliance with the ordinance requirements. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Appeal Resolution No. CC-653 , A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, which states that the City Council upholds the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, and affirms the City Administrator's interpretation of Section 11. 05, Subd. 8, that mobile home structures are permitted as a Conditional Use within the Agricultural and Rural Residential Zoning Districts only, that are not permitted within the RTD for use as storage structures, and that a mobile home structure does not meet the definition of an agricultural building as defined in State Statute 16B. 60, and move its adoption. APPEAL RESOLUTION NO. CC-653 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA. WHEREAS, Mr. John Clark, applicant, and Mr. Eugene Hauer, owner, have filed an application dated December 3 , 1992 , for an Appeal to the Decision of the City Administrator under the provisions of Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation (Zoning) , of the Shakopee City Code, Section 11. 04, Subd. 4 ; and WHEREAS, the applicant is appealing the City Administrator's interpretation of Section 11. 05, Subd. 8 , Mobile Homes, which states the following: Mobile homes shall be regulated by Section 4 . 60 of the City Code (Mobile Home Park Regulations) , except that mobile homes shall be a conditional use in the "A-1" and "R-1" Districts for agricultural purposes if they meet the following standards: A. Property must be being used as an agricultural use. B. Mobile home may not be the only occupied residential structure on the property. C. The persons living in the mobile home must be related to the farm operator and must work on that farm. D. The mobile home may be placed on the property for one 5 year term and the permit may be reissued for additional 5 year term or terms at the discretion of the Planning Commission. E. The conditional use must be reviewed on an annual basis; and WHEREAS, the present zoning for the parcel on which the Appeal is being requested is designed as Racetrack District (RTD) ; and WHEREAS, the applicant is appealing the interpretation of Section 11. 05, Subd. 8 to allow mobile homes to be used as storage structures within the Racetrack District (RTD) ; and WHEREAS, the property upon which the request is being made is legally described as: Section 8 , Township 115, Range 22 , 1. 6 Acres in the North 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 ; and WHEREAS, notice was provided and on January 7 , 1993 , the Board of Adjustment and Appeals conducted a public hearing regarding this appeal, at which time it heard from the City Planner and invited members of the public to comment; and WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals continued this public hearing to their February 4, 1993 , meeting, at which time it heard additional comments from the City Planner and invited members of the public to comment; and WHEREAS, upon hearing the advice and recommendation of the City Planner and upon considering the suggestions and objections raised in a public hearing duly held thereon; and WHEREAS, the aforementioned application for an Appeal to the Decision of the City Administrator to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals was denied for the following reasons: 1. The subject site is located within the Racetrack Zoning District (RTD) . The approval of this appeal would permit mobile home structures to be used as storage structures within the RTD. 2 . Section 11. 36, Racetrack District (RTD) regulations, does not list mobile home structures as either a Permitted nor a Conditional Use within this Zoning District. 3 . Section 11. 05, Subd. 8 states that mobile home structures are permitted as a Conditional Use within the Agricultural and Rural Residential Zoning Districts only. 4 . State Statute 16.B. 60 defines agricultural buildings as structures designed, constructed and used to house agricultural items. The mobile home structure was not designed and constructed to house agricultural items. WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals allowed the applicant until June 15, 1993 , to remove the mobile home structure from the site; and WHEREAS, Mr. John Clark, applicant, and Mr. Eugene Hauer, owner, have filed an application dated February 11, 1993 , for an Appeal of the Decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals under the provisions of Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation (Zoning) , of the Shakopee City Code, Section 11. 04 , Subd. 4 . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, as follows: That the City Council upholds the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, and affirms the City Administrator's interpretation of Section 11. 05, Subd. 8 , to not allow mobile homes to be used as storage structures within the Racetrack District (RTD) . Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 19 Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney • . EXHIBIT A • . ... . . .._. ..............___•-••L•MLA.,.a.a II.Ilin,•=.4.MLA MOIL MM."WM•a•M•/1•14.1./1/J.W1•1111111111/1.1.....••••••...•. .....‘=•• •.-. ••...•....••••••-i --r---------- . 1 , . . . . , . . • 1 . . - • • i ......- : , Insmiemiessilmeimm. 4 • " R4 ' . H i ,, . '1 • I i .. ... ___....: I. i 1 . . • . RTD • . • t , CA of 1-LROUR f :lc , ;IP.,$,•4:' ' , ' • * • i ........, • !, -- •,. ....._._ . . _____ -.1____ ..• I :::."<•-•.. , . . -- • : • ; ....., *b. . ..-1 r....;:...„."‘...*;.....4.)--..".., V ..'',..... • I . - I 1 4-1 t-- --..-,...-- -_..,. -.). --...• ..: _,... ,....,, '... :.2.e....g_-_; LL_. • '. 1 's - --.".-- C,,' • i„.7.-,'',. ..;‘, 1 7:1 1-777iF771-- 1:.:4,..i. Tig/>\ A 1 .1''''',.. 1'- I . .., • 1:-__- 1 _,1 r ...--. . : . , 2,Z: ' - b., ! s ,,,, ...,• ,•,.. / • -" : . ;',. 44 ,.. ....; i.-..—•.it i-----4 ,"''T"".,V r---..t.• \ 'VT ,..,,;-"..‘.... • .. .' '-)'-. •••• ,...:.:: ..,,:lre."4 SUBJECT SITE ,t;• ; . - L • -- L__•• . , \ .) l'-!.. /.. • . i '''........4.46* ':::•::::::::::zr t*:•.1 L!flzr11 L:_17:1 tifill baj- .1. :5-14\s\,:i 4 `474 - —-- ---- — ---1— --\\' —-- ,........y... ',- • r ; - •r^-.. : .....1 7:-.74. :•,_.: 1 ;•: : : 1_11 41 I-- 4 . ...s... % ,......,/ 1 1 i "--......_ ........ i \\. AG AGRICULTURE :.•!._ .• - — ., • ---.....-.... -,, .., • ---...: .. ...,-, / i....._ ..... ..., . Pai, \ . ./,,,,‹. i; r•-•,, -.."---.: : ; . R1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL .1v ). ({ R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL • : .=•.-----. .•-:•,.....1....-r....---r ... _ „: s ••••,.. ----- .--,--•,-,-ii• -(e\ill',9->:'4,4-' / / 7--... I . ` . R3 MID-DENSITY RES. z .\\--'51, I..A..--1 ; .,7 ".1--,---s--- -1 / ti ,d I •. R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. - • ,( -. 144 c'Sti•, .'=-1-t-----7-- „7--41Pli<'---;.." -4.,Ii , ..., .;. . •• .\.c).;:_f,--,- ; -...41/4d :i•-• • / • _:, .A :!, 1 B1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS i.• 2,--t, ., ; ; 3; Ff..-;--::1V--1/. \illi i' .. B2 COMMUNITY BUSINESS ----"--7:77(;-..rn , r-.•.. ah, ; B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS 1 _..,,/.........i—i Li 4,.....„.1,j „....7L... A__...; ...... i ............„:7 ,...._ .--„,---; ,3 I-., 1 I -' • ..-7 * ...1 •,3,AL f: ....1.--- ....... --2--• 14—i LI*A3-2---Ce ' I '. 21 1.,1,-1- /..- , • i A 3,... Ism 11 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL .--; I-1-1 i: . . _3_37171 •_14--i- ___------ , 12 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL J__,1....1.--;----___---•-r----E I---. -- ------_- ; __..- __ -- S SHORELAND { . --- , _ - - - _ _ - • . ; i _.-- .:.: ....: FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT, - - _ - -- ; i '----- ------ ---- — — -- — — _ _;-- -;-• MANDATORY PUD :RTD RACETRACK DISTRICT- - _ -- • - Zoning Map City of SHAKOPEE . . . • • gei,,, , f3 EXHIBIT B &Izde-ep-e-e , a ss374 / • di iev 6v-teet-kt A (1(1 dice • • /o , � . °UI6iP. GA a , • o • a, LJ-e, l(r y ExHIBIT C , 2 1 0 0 EAGLE CREEK BOULEVARD ` ` Photographs taken Jan 20, 1993, .by Fulton Schleisman, Bldg Official :-., • s...._:_ . •-_-: - • .. .r.r r .y'•' i: s wi . '�!fes a a 73.......--1.- of ter _ x� ''' ' -... ./ .11L......alikei riff? • -), -'a ly fYi, - te-. ^ 1. l Z. t•• i t S 1.)1 �•_Ir.a `t tc t 'E,`G4.� ' S 7s�t z '' - T{ ' ,- t , s if. 7 • - t - - rt,»•ar.r :.rvv, .T ,,�y ',.."'..3'''''''''''';'.7,, .4..‘ . .. i V • 1 F ., ! ate' ��Cil. .10:• �� a '>-' "�"' { -"•:�j7.F— ':a's4.p..e`°+t j Z ;1•Vii:;`••• a .e;" r • a., .�. r-- • r'F - �. �. :� a-J': ���: _. •fir • •'� [+'C 4. 41.'t,-, 71-:: •;,:;• i '•, { / e t > 4ip 41, .„iii ,-..?-1-..414-:!.-_-,-.'_•-.:,..,-.<;_,--..-,A..;ISAl71 �.i•, 6 t. 1 -.1-. 1, . LI� t • • r • '-{�S� ` V . ' ^ am. • s w _ - t ,- -. - - C- teas .z,, a f,.4.. . •.... ...„.._.,..4...,,,,,...„. r �, 1 ; 1S"l j ,- ..-'11P.1!.::• .. •w,. 04%).$1 47Cei * i:5;fil.4,. _AN- _ ' ' - 16*-%.,,,ili Ikt1 pt- — _ .- ,. :,,,,,,,,,ft.---,T la m i =V �s • T — •i - < ., .7T-- i WN.• — ::14'Te. liwAt Gia ti. i '- 1.01,V:$7 ` _r�p1• . 1 , ..... .....,:,=•-,--• x y - r}j{ a- - .. �.._._ --+._-- yY`rS.r�.Ya ,_r'w..� .. sav st,- - -••=---".:M .-7-.7.-- -:it�^CR6. ..- i_-.__.. .:.....e..-..f..._•..44,4'',...-. e,.�, >..!<+.. - #3 U , "q • • 7Sts.v.i "t l •„G_^,•+3 tn...T ✓: ✓ r ri.c ^ a -- .. x�`rt'dw.i ,. 43..,-,.-..,,• x ri rix =yy � z-.,-- a-,_„ : i -- . v _ T .�„ . -CY, �r ----1-7,-4-„,•'.7cT.':,---lz� 1r.t ;..�•-.� � r�� L 7: • _x t'�c _ _ Na-gf,ei,?r. -siX i-dE'...rdr, Y e N,�s'a•�'{'/, 4vM-. �3h r ,.. t �-i1�' '�,}�. ^{.•+u- _ :4 . 1w • , 4 � i r •: .fat§ F' ...-,,...g,..,,v''t �b` � « ^ ''''.'.(-1 t•� ' prof .tr • :s > 'pi!. M ^_t:YcQ'• • • •i• �4 di' �t: 4 •` -4t"� - de -- �wsiz : t a his+. x- •r. x �t Ct •��,', ! `' ' r-ii� '.t...7",-. rc ... .. i"� �•c �`r ,ti'• e� s �i , i ,n"•;te. `•. '!�•T.7 .1:41)4 5r ir. X"'P *+ ,i - y -.0 / ^r'':i l� Ott.-.0#may`. �.r->._. ...A a'S f.#4,,t` ' a •' '. ._ ,4 'if !,.• 4 t t ''-'1,-„..•..FY.-• s 'i.: ".. s� } _�{, • `r i �•.• - • lr" .r•. } _ =A• -* zj �.�# l :• - .M. • t .., t> iy L '.' �i","r• 7 : ._ :a 1 _ � ..' �r' ` �C-t j° •i i,,:3-asa--..'•..kv_ '.I'll., .4... ...'-i:<•' �jt p w S .. ' ^ 4 i pct a tai} ? ' z Ys �t wr :r a• . —z 14►___.; illei1414 2 ! a Dom- "meq ; �kr a �r;� s x y y'Ci sill- f . .mss • . , a. ` 's .,JY � r -'fb+�iYv .'�'•,*�, -x Irl C ,- '+atc, .�'7!,+r+� f�,_ -.�- < 'f" ':.4--- '' r r <h-+-�i, C1,ST' ., P s.xrr$ i r - - i F 7 �-t.: �• '? - /-- s *., yly. `. of. * •• • —� „�' :. . li • a1:7 . +► f -1-.�.-"- sic "�!le.ii -,q._!•-•-•.44-i.._ �.r. s.rr i"a�+'ji'po -t .> w. r y :4:.s.. ytkL/+.M;;a7Lt ` •---_ ,�•- ��'yc'�-v't: _- c. .. - /o ...„.. ...„2. •tiT� • 'g •.f.a f _”,'.4.4,11 -t % `�,' -. .o "s rs�. e .+i?�' 3t t t..,-i r"�••�v : Ni ti , s,. 1,, __ y'.. rl: • , ,a �tl ':air. ._ - • ,. • i. td` K� r F t t ' �,-. " mkt . ' - • • .-- . IM ' • \ "�P 7s`._.n. y , kir N' z • - III -- _ x^ -.3-7ua fig• Vis.. ^' _.__.,...,,..-,.....,a,,,,,,./.4.,..., • - - - - - -.:- - - ._ _ rr'^°i+ 1. ..5 .'S.S_...•-.---•..sa_ -t:eC.r•j• ,-00,`" ' ' r� -F 1 i . . J{'pg+`i�5; y _ ' ..- v ..� r - �S ` • SEI •4,..f.-*'-- S_.. • ill • y.• In ti • • ..-.-,.,•*-- ,.,1,.. ,- ...,-;-4. f ',,-*.--te . *.th'-4-- • - ;,--.- ",-.2..: 4-...‘-r- r 4 r r----------t __________ } r Ir , 47.1 lilr"Of i.-. ' - f ,_ • r • ,- •s t t r .rL ^-,—'. + ,5_- sh• .t _,.j . s tea — _._ - - .----..--t::_...-;,.....,.....;.,-----k--...,...'s...., -- - ,-C---, '??...---..-7---.7.---,----77.--------;-• '...v"-,-.7 - ..- ' "----:.7-----.;------------;-1- --.-,-..-:- -,.;--,Z----.-1,,:.7,-.--'-----17.,-7.--,..,-'7-.--.,-,-.-----,-;----77-. • - . - 7 - ,--i---.----,-1- • - .. , . '...7.r.7::..-7 r-,'-'••••r.:- ...,:.......... -417,7-7-1=,--.,...7,---,,, ,;..-..--.....:-...F..'f,-C•Fs74---Is-- ----"-:..--------------- - - -• •• .., • _ . .4•4. _ . . .urt ...r....-. . , . . . . . _ . ._, .... . . ..... :,7. • . . . . - . .,... - - ' -• j%I, . . . _ . ..., .., _ __ . . . . •. _ . •- . - • - , •• ,_..,,•.. . , . , • - - . • .•.- - .- - , - . .. . . . ,. •.._ . -*--17-.' , , . ,-..• ... ••. ----_,-..• • .• . . . ., ..... . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . ; -.--: : „ ,.-1-:., _.•. . . . .- - -,... ir."-• ,•• i•-•'::T.- . . . . .. ... _.. . . .,. .. . .. , . . .. • . . . . . - • .1•: . . _ . .,• _ . ,- -.-...L-, -.._. •:••••-•`.•'..-1......-'1".• . i. • ...: t-.. 0 . z , 1 ' .tii;.::: • , , .,,, . I11 . . . __. -_, •... — . _.: -. . I ......,-!IC Zyti ::- . .. • -1. .,_ I -.7-----1...'.; :-Psi.4" • . : 0111...... - _. ._. • •••"4111 . . ...^,-;,.. S;.. . •-• - . . .. . . __ . ._ . . .. . • . . .. ...... --- . . .,..... . .. . , 1 . 1.• igi t , I , . • ... ,-t ..._.• - :.4.. .,....____ ......,,, i; - - • . ,•1 . _. ., , .. . - .. .•. - .. , , . .„ _...._____. .,......" • .' .c.,........ . • .... ',ire-. .t .r.,...... -.... i . . . • . ..... C-1 - XS= i II I I..: . .1.....,...i.1.,-_... ,:_:....'..-1.:-, e•...;,,,•......-...,.......i-4-:a.-.....i.;-_:...A.,ig",..,a,:,44:1: , .6 .1"! .....- 1 -. i..,. ! -- 411111---- tiA ... --&-• 1;.... ... .. I .: A t • . ?rit c . .„,... . , -4 r-- 114. 1,„ ----- ..r-t.„ • ,___ .-........4. a.,&1411141111111 MIL •,,fa-.. .i f'.. • 1 -- -. - -- -' -.477 ... ,-,6- ...16,--..,"'-......, _t . • - . , i :• . . . _ _ . 1 .... ' - . . . -,.;-•:::--....i.,,a-s--- ._ ., - . . . . -.. . .-..._ . ,. . .....- • , r- - , ... ,.. . . ... , _. , .........._. . ".. .....Z.. . _ , . t ir 1...... .... . ,. .. . , .., . ..- - il.''441110Ptf IMEIr ...4 * f...; 4... IL: - • '.., ... • . . . - ._ . . it- , -IL 4 .... , •, . - 1 .- ... . . .; .' , . __ jr1, , ' :VII ,. .. • - - ' - . . _.--..-...... • _ . _ . , . 11111111111, L IP' . ,: - ,.. „ . ._.. _ , . - - -•------ - . ... . . • . . „..: . - • " --- --• ' - .„ • ... . . CONSENT /� aJ MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Star City One Year and Three Year Work Programs DATE: February 24 , 1993 INTRODUCTION: Each year the City of Shakopee is required to submit a One Year and Three Year Economic Development Work Plan to the Department of Trade and Economic Development in order to maintain Star City designation. The One and Three Year Work Plans also serve as a guide to direct staff in capitalizing on Shakopee's development potential. BACKGROUND: On February 17 , 1993 the Shakopee Community Development Commission reviewed and approved the proposed One Year and Three Year Economic Development Work Plans. The plans serve as a guide for City Council, staff and the other boards and commissions in terms of areas of focus. It would be appropriate at this time for the City Council to review both the One and Three Year Economic Development Work Plans and determine if additional items should be included at this time or if items should be deleted or amended. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Move to approve the Shakopee Economic Development One Year and Three Year Work Plans. 2 . Amend the One Year and Three Year Work Plans and approve accordingly. 3 . Table action pending further information from staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1 . ACTION REQUESTED: Move to approve the Shakopee Economic Development One Year and Three Year Work Plans. Community Development Commission (CDC) Shakopee Economic Development 1993 One Year Work Plan Mission Statement: To create new jobs, increase the local tax base, retain and assist existing business, attract new businesses and capitalize on the existing area development potentials. Activity/objective: To encourage the implementation of an ongoing economic development program for the City of Shakopee stressing job retention, job creation, downtown development and the tourism industry. Budget: CDC Budget $18, 840 Time Frame: Ongoing from January 1993 Projected Results: 5% Increase in local tax base. 2 . 5% Increase in population. 2 . 5% Increase in employment base. 10% Increase in the number of residential building permits issued. Attraction of at least one new commercial business in the downtown. Attraction of at least one new industry into the industrial park. Attraction of at lease one elderly residential development. 5% Increase in tourists at the recreational facilities in Shakopee. Committee/Organization Chairpersons: Shakopee City Council - Mayor Gary Laurent Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority - Mike Beard Convention and Visitors Bureau - Deb Carey Shakopee Community Development Commission - Bill Mars Chamber of Commerce - Terry O'Toole, President Scott County Transportation Coalition Planning Commission - Terry Joos City of Shakopee - Staff City Administrator - Dennis Kraft Assistant City Administrator - Barry Stock City Planner - Lindberg Ekola City Engineer - Dave Hutton 1993 One Year Work Plan Page - 2 Goal #1 Provide for the improvement of the transportation system and to enhance local and regional transportation objectives. Objective Assigned To Completion Date 1 . Complete the CR 17/Shakopee Planning May 93 Bypass Planning Study Commission 2 . Complete the East Shakopee Planning Dec 93 Transportation Plan. Commission 3 . Complete a Shakopee Traffic Planning Nov 93 Control Plan Commission Goal #2 Encourage downtown development which will promote a vital commercial/institutional district. Objective Assigned To Completion Date 1. Complete a planning update Planning Dec 93 to the Downtown Revitalization Commission Plan 2 . Evaluate the rehabilitation CDC Apr 93 grant program and determine if City Council it should be continued, amended or altogether terminated. 3 . Work with SPUC to determine if CDC\SPUC Mar 93 the utility lines in downtown City Council should be placed underground. 4 . Work with MnDOT to determine if CDC\City Council May 93 parking enhancements can be added to the lot to be constructed on the Brambilla site. 5. Determine if a parking lot should CDC\City Council Mar 93 be constructed on the former Pelham Hotel site. 6. Work with MnDot to determine if CDC\City Council Apr 93 an ornamental rail can be added on to the new bridge and bypass. 7 . Continue to strive toward CDC\City Council Ongoing completing elements identified Downtown Pre-Development Plan. 1993 One Year Work Plan Page - 3 Goal #3 Initiate planning and marketing concepts that will increase residential development interest in the community. Objective Assigned To Completion Date 1. Complete the update of the Planning Comm. July 93 City's Comprehensive Plan. City Council 2 . Complete the Valley Ice Arena City Council Mar 93 analysis and determine if a facility should be constructed. 3 . Determine if the City should CDC/Park Board/ Apr 93 acquire property South of the City Council Sr. High School for municipal facility purposes. 4. Work with the DNR to facilitate Park Board July 93 the completion of the MN River city Council Valley Trail through Shakopee. 5. Complete the Shakopee Bypass Planning Comm. May 93 Noise Impact Study 6. Develop a City Newsletter Piece CDC July 93 in conjunction with the Recreation/Comm. Ed brochure. Goal #4 Encourage new industrial development and the expansion of existing industries in the City. Objective Assigned To Completion Date 1. Work with and support the CDC Ongoing activities of the Scott County Economic Dev. Coalition. 2 . Develop a plan to contact at CDC Ongoing least one business per month. 3. Complete the East Dean Lake Planning Comm. Dec. 93 Study. 4. Evaluate the concept of creating CDC July 93 an Economic Dev. Authority. 1993 One Year Work Plan Page - 4 Goal #5 Encourage the development of support services such as schools, medical facilities and public facilities which provide for a good free standing growth center. Objective Assigned To Completion Date 1. Work with St. Francis Hospital City Council Ongoing to facilitate the development of their new site. 2 . Work with the School District to City Council April 93 acquire property to meet their future growth needs. Goal #6 Develop an organizational structure and staffing program which will promote economic development. Objective Assigned To Completion Date 1. Complete the 1994 One Year City Council Jan. 1994 Work Plan. 2 . Complete the Annual Community CDC Feb. 1993 Profile. 3 . Evaluate the need for additional City Council July 93 staffing in the area of Economic Development including the Building Dept. Goal #7 Support and encourage a community focus on tourism opportunities emphasizing year round activities. Objective Assigned To Completion Date 1. Work with the Shakopee CDC Ongoing Visitors and Convention Bureau and Chamber of Commerce on marketing and special events which will attract tourists to the area. 2 . Promote year round use of the CDC Ongoing hospitality and tourism industry. City of Shakopee Three Year Economic Development Plan Goal #1 Provide for the improvement of the transportation system and to enhance local and regional transit objectives. Objective 1993 1994 1995 1. Construct Phase II of the X Downtown Redevelopment Project. 1st Ave. (Atwood - Sommerville) 2 . Work with Mn DOT during X the construction of the mini bypass to minimize the impact on the downtown area. 3 . Complete the CR17/Shakopee Bypass Planning Study X 4 . Complete the East Shakopee X Transportation Plan 5 . Complete a Shakopee Traffic X Control Plan 6. Complete the First Ave. X Planning Study 7 . Complete the Marschall Rd X Corridor Plan 8 . Complete the CR 83 Corridor X Study. Goal #2 Encourage downtown redevelopment which will promote a vital commercial/institutional district. Objective 1993 1994 1995 i. Complete a planning update to Downtown Revitalization Plan. X 2 . Evaluate the Rehabilitation X Grant Program and determine if it should be continued, amended or altogether terminated. CDC 1993 Three Year Work Plan Page - 2 3 , Work with SPUC to determine if X the utility lines in downtown should be placed underground. A .. Work with MnDot to determine X if landscape enhancements can be added to the parking lot to be constructed on the Brambilla site. 5 . Determine if a parking lot should X be constructed on the former Pelham Hotel site. 6 . Work with MnDot to determine if an X an ornamental rail can be added on to the new bridge and bypass. 7 . Reconstruct the alleys in the X Downtown area. L Create a subcommittee to X evaluate alternatives for improving the riverfront entrance into the downtown area. 9 . Complete Phase II of the X Downtown Redevelopment Plan. 10 . Evaluate options for enhancing X the critical entry points into the Downtown Area. Goal #3 Initiate Planning and Marketing concepts that will increase residential development in the community. Objective 1993 1994 1995 1. As a result of the X Comp. Plan update, comprehensively amend the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance in order to facilitate sound economic development in a timely manner. 2 . Participate in the Scott X X X County Economic Development Coalition and CDC 1993 Three Year Work Plan Page - 3 support their activities. 3 . Work with the DNR to X facilitate the completion of the MN River Valley Trail through Shakopee. 4 . Complete the Valley Ice X Arena analysis and determine if a facility should be constructed. 5. Determine if the property X South of the Sr, High should be acquired for municipal uses. 6. Evaluate options to improve X communications with residents including the possibility of a City newsletter. 7 . Complete the Shakopee Bypass X Noise Impact Study 8 . Complete a Park Acquisition X and Improvement Plan 9 . Complete an Urban Forestry Plan X Goal #4 Encourage new industrial development and the expansion of existing industries in the City. Objective 1993 1994 1995 1. Update the data base of X vacant commercial industrial properties. 2 . Work with and support X X X the activities of the Scott County Economic Development Coalition 3 . Develop a plan to have X X X staff contact at least one existing Shakopee business per month. - CDC 1993 Three Year Work Plan Page - 4 4 . Complete the East Dean X Lake Planning Study 5. Evaluate the concept X of creating an Economic Development Authority Goal #5 Encourage the development of support services such as schools, medical facilities and public facilities which provide for a good free standing growth center. Objective 1993 1994 1995 1. Work with St. Francis X X X Hospital to facilitate the development of their new site. 2 Work with School District X to acquire property south of Sr. High for their future expansion needs. 3 . Work with the owners of the X industrial park to negotiate a land swap for trail purposes around Deans Lake in lieu of future park dedication fees. 4. Identify and acquire a site for X a second fire station. Goal #6 Develop an organizational structure and staffing program which will promote economic development. Objective 1993 1994 1995 1. Complete the annual X X X Community Profile. 2 . Complete the One Year X X X Work Plan 3 . Evaluate the need for additional staffing in the X area if economic development and the building department. CDC 1993 Three Year Work Plan Page - 5 Goal #7 Support and encourage a community focus on tourism opportunities emphasizing year round activities. Objective 1993 1994 1995 1. Work with the Shakopee X X X Visitors and Convention Bureau and Chamber of Commerce on marketing and special events which will attract tourists to the area. 2 . Promote year round use of X X X the hospitality and Tourism industry. 3 . Work with the DNR to X X X complete the MN Valley Trail through Shakopee. 13 (-A, MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Second Avenue Parking Lot - Parking Plan DATE: February 24 , 1993 INTRODUCTION: Initially staff felt that the existing parking requirements in the downtown area would be adequate to meet the parking demand for the City Hall employees. Since our move, we have experienced some problems with inadequate longer term parking availability in the vicinity of the City Hall . Staff is therefore recommending that the Second Avenue parking lot parking plan be amended increasing the number of eight hour parking spaces. BACKGROUND: The parking plan for the Second Avenue parking lot was last amended in July of 1987 . Prior to the parking plan amendment in 1987 the parking in the center aisle of the Second Avenue parking lot was posted for eight hour parking. Parking along the north row of the lot was split between two hour and four hour parking. Council subsequently amended the parking plan changing the entire north row of the parking lot to eight hour parking and the center aisle of parking to two hour parking. (See attachment #1 - current parking arrangement. ) In order to accommodate longer term parking in the vicinity of the City Hall, staff is proposing to reduce the number of two hour parking spaces in the center aisle by 50%. This would be accomplished through resigning the parking in the center aisle to eight hours along the northerly half and two hours along the southerly half of the center aisle parking. (See attachment #2 - proposed parking plan. ) On Wednesday, February 24th a flier was distributed to the businesses within the immediate vicinity of the Second Avenue parking lot indicating the proposed changes in parking restrictions. Shown in attachment #3 is a complete summary of the parking restrictions presently posted in the entire downtown area. It would be appropriate at this time to discuss whether or not the Second Avenue parking lot plan should be amended. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Amend the Second Avenue parking lot plan reducing the number of two hour parking spaces in the center aisle parking by 50% and changing the parking restrictions to eight hour parking in the northern half of the center aisle parking. 2 . Amend the Second Avenue parking lot plan changing the entire center aisle parking to four hour parking. 3 . Amend the Second Avenue parking lot plan reducing the number of two hour spaces by 50% and changing the parking restrictions to four hour parking in the northern half of the center aisle parking. 4 . Table action pending further information from staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1 . ACTION REQUESTED: Amend the Second Avenue parking lot plan reducing the number of two hour parking spaces in the center aisle parking by 50% and changing the parking restrictions to eight hour parking in the northern half of the center aisle parking. 4#achnteiri- / - Cl4D 0119$0,11 - - --.- I r. k ---- - ''.. )iii - -. - rc .c 1.--1 -c5-- -;.S-1- - iII . _ _ Illb----- - --.1- -- ---- _II-- -- __ _,.....L -1...., 1-1.....7„ - --1- Lb . -- _c:g_ ic:: 1-24 -_ • ---ie,- - -" ,--11 - c\ -- _ _0.,LCI, Cg Iviia7vAi - - - - - - -. - - ---i-rg - c I-Li -------- -C:)-- _C::::LIC.:1 _ Lb 4 - 1 -; 1 _cc_ -c\ri-c - _ _ _,_ _ _ 04- - - E--1 II: I ... _ -...,.< CP.: 1-- — _ __ _ _ Er- N._ "2) _. _ 44 __ _ _ ' i--- - - _ c-11MeArf #Z - 11N9Ylf .. - � - �_ _ _ Z4- Q49±2L AVMX7VA1 - - -1- 41.* - - - c - . � � - - g.4 MEETING NOTICE SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AND PROPERTY OWNERS On Tuesday, March 2,1993 at approximately 7:00 p.m. in the Shakopee City Council Chambers a proposed amendment to the Downtown Parking Plan will be presented to City Council. The amendment relates to the parking restrictions presently posted in the Second Avenue Parking Lot. The proposed plan will reduce the number of two hour parking stalls and increase the number of eight hour parking stalls. A map indicating the proposed parking plan is on the back side of this correspondence. Those persons wishing to speak to the proposed parking restriction change should attend the March 2, 1993 meeting. A «c-A•► i 413 \ A 1 W 0 CD n °-` 1-1-1 In ] lA A Os > (X 1 CL• I- o Ln U 00 N r7 ♦ . a ❑ < 0 �-y • O; \ D n C--- o s Mi 0 • ` J 411 0 Oi-a f • I___ _ i� rY o Q (f) � o z 0 \ 0 ��� LU F I R E D E P A R T M E N T Department Memo To : Dennis Kraft , City Administrator From: Frank Ries , Fire Chief Date : March 2 , 1993 Subject : 1975 Aerial Platform Truck Introduction: The approval to sell 1975 aerial platform truck by bid. Background: Send a sealed bid, To Beatrice City, Nebraska to sell 1975 aerial platform. Truck to be sold as .is , (no warranty) ladders are the only equipment to be on the truck . The selling price of the truck $180 , 000 . 00 . Bidder must present registered check for the truck at the time of transfer. Transfer to take place in Shakopee . Frank Ries Shakopee Fire Chief j3b SHAKOPEE F IRE DEPAR'11•11ENT Department Memo To : Dennis Kraft , City Adm .nistr. ator City Council From: Frank Ries , Fire Chief Date: February 24th , 1993 Subject: Request to bid for Aerial Platform Apparatus 4 Background: This memo is a request for the City Council to authorize the Shakopee Fire Department to let out bids for an Aerial Platform Apparatus replacing ! the 1975 unit . This apparatus has been approved in the 1993 Capital Equipment Budget . 1 Recommendation: Approve the action to allow Shakopee Fire Department to publish and except bids for the City of Shakopee to purchase an Aerial Platform Apparatus . Respectfully submitted, Frank Ries Shakopee Fire Chief l5C- MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Reconsideration of County Trunk Highway 18 Roadway Width Between C.R. 16 and C.R. 42 DATE: February 26, 1993 INTRODUCTION: Councilor Beard has requested that the City Council reconsider the width of C.R. 18 between C.R. 16 and C.R. 42 , as a result of information that he received this past week at a public hearing which was held by Scott County. BACKGROUND: At the Council meeting of February 16th, the City Council revisited the question of whether C.R. 18 should have a two lane or a four lane width between C.R. 16 and C.R. 42 . After discussion the City Council decided to reaffirm it's earlier position of wanting the highway to remain two lanes wide. The Scott County Board of Commissioners subsequently held a public hearing for area residents on this subject on February 23rd. At that meeting additional data was presented which indicated a higher volume of traffic on this roadway than earlier studies had predicted. Representatives from the Scott County Highway Department have been invited to attend this meeting and present this new information. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Reaffirm the Council decision of February 16th and recommend that the roadway remain two lanes wide. 2 . Recommend to the Scott County Board of Commissioners that the roadway have a four lane cross section. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council analyze the data presented and decide whether they want to reaffirm or change their position on the roadway width for this project. ACTION REQUESTED: Recommend to the Scott County Board of Commissioners that County Trunk Highway 18 between highways 16 and 42 be constructed at a lane width. 1 S J MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Application For Premises Permit - Shakopee VFW DATE: February 26, 1993 INTRODUCTION: The Shakopee VFW Post 4046 has submitted an application for a premises permit for Cheers 2 YA, 911 East 1st Avenue. BACKGROUND: The Shakopee Youth Baseball/Softball Organization currently has a premises permit for Cheers 2 YA through July 31, 1993 . City Council approved this premises permit in 1991. (They also have a premises permit for Dangerfields. ) The VFW has been advised by Cheers 2 YA that the Shakopee Youth Baseball/Softball Organization plans on discontinuing selling pull tabs. They have asked the VFW to sell pull tabs. The Shakopee VFW Post is interested in obtaining a premises permit for Cheers 2 YA for the remainder of the VFW's licensing period, until July 31, 1993 . The VFW has previously obtained premises permits for: 1) 1201 East 3rd Avenue, 2) Turtles Bar, and 3) The Eagles Club through July 31, 1993 . (All premisses permits for one organization expire on the same date. ) Before the Gambling Control Board will approve a premises permit, they must receive a resolution of approval from the local governing body. Assuming that City Council would not want to approve two premises permits for the same establishment, I asked the VFW to provide correspondence from the Shakopee Youth Baseball/Softball Organization stating that they no longer wish to be licensed and will be discontinuing selling pull tabs at Cheers 2 YA. If the correspondence is available before Tuesday night's meeting, I will place a copy on the council table. I spoke with a representative from the Gambling Control Board and learned that more than one premises permit can be issued for the same location. The lease for the space where the pull tabs will be sold must be different for each premises permit. The City of Shakopee has not been asked to approve more than one premises permit per location. City Council may wish to adopt a policy limiting premises permits to one per establishment. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt resolution approving premises permit (providing a correspondence is received from the Shakopee Youth Baseball/Softball Organization by Tuesday's meeting) . 2 . Table the request for a premises permit, if a correspondence is not received from the Shakopee Youth Baseball/Softball Organization by Tuesday's meeting. 3 . Adopt resolution approving premises permit, regardless of whether or not a correspondence is received from the Shakopee Youth Baseball/Softball Organization by Tuesday's meeting. 4 . Adopt resolution denying premises permit. 5. Direct staff to prepare an amendment to the gambling regulations to limit premises permits to one per location. 6 . Other, as suggested by councilmembers. RECOMMENDATION: Alternatives 1 and 5. Staff recommends that only one permit be approved per location and that approval be granted only if a correspondence is received from the Shakopee Youth Baseball/Softball Organization. The correspondence, if received, and a resolution approving the premises permit will be placed on the council table at Tuesday's meeting. ,:::Z4‘,.--.1-: - FOR BOARD USE ONLY BASE# LG214) PP# , FEE CHECK Minnesota Lawful Gambling INITIALS -�t" Premises Permit Application - Part 1 of 2 DATE :; ea —{.v4v.•v:ii--,,-.vn,;,,,,:.}-„,..,--4.:4}+.%r:%•}: ,•.v.v:n .............:.v:::::....:.,v?::.;.,v-{.}})i}i.i:•}}i:::i}:•:�}i..:?�)i})Y.�Mi::{'..:::::::. ?:r:-:v.,:?v::rv::.v:.r......,: ..............-:,* :°K:v - :::•::::v::.;:.)%•:`::::.i':::::.w::r4:•::h::?h.i;?�:rvn':.}:.;�:::::::.................. M1..::.rri}:.{?!:???ti?r?!•i?.. .r.... .. :....... ......................... ....../.w:��:F.3::?;{i:j C'ii:+rNf:•v:}??:.}'�:'?..... .. .. r..... ........:.. ::::::::::.v: r.i}::i:).mr::m.::::}% ...iii}'.}:v.v:::.::�::::.v:::...... ............. . ...7,, ,•, . A ''' _ .•fir+ .-.} ..: ....... ... • .... ..}...............:::.................... .. ...................... 1 . :} :» O;It}iii :tii':i>`i`:if`: r;:;: ir:::ii`-:.?i:i1::!::Ti: ?-::-:::::.:::?>:-::::'is::.:.::::: ::::::::::.:.... Class of premises permit -_ _••: n Renewal (check one) Organization base license number E A($400) Pull-tabs,tipboards,paddlewheels,raffles,bingo -'`T� -•_,. Premises permit number g B($250) Pull-tabs,tipboards,paddlewheels,raffles New ❑ C($200) Bingo only ----- ___ _- 0 D($150) Raffles only -- _._,,._.,__T. {?q!r}x•;:;;. ,r•.` Y.c'r•"•:hysk.....z.^ x':.>:r^w«;::•?•:_<:zi%`>n:'_"'.`•-`'•n"` ?!f:i{'vi:?M1r?•:??;�)}:{^,.r4r):.i}:}{r.i:??:r{`} 4.;.,: {}4 y � n f.x.?.., };.. r'k�•f•fir / f .F,.y>.4�'!v¢`:' n.£ +v+�ir .J4 r;;:;:;:: .. ... ..::.•::xr.v:x:::rx:w+v-Ki:i4:-:?':?�:ii.'?::�i`in�$:'�+!:�i:}�i:?:�'riii.:{•i}:{•: .,.:•}'ri ......4'•vr}•r{p.. ::{:!4:i,?{{.:n:v-.•....::::•:::::�-:::.:::vr..:::: -:,v..:•.v:...... .�...:....:::::•r.....v:• ,..x:x:x.:v:.v:}r.....- :n.......•• ��:i;.}}j nrF.., ?,.Vr}�{�•)', ::..........r4:.,.�.:•...r...::��::.,...::. -.... .:::::::.v...:-.4i!):w::::... :i::!•i:j:i?�i:ti4}}.¢ - {:.{ •'ti�.fri {.'�..,+x �#;.� .r•�. r-,..�......r '-7'..7.;.'-''':: #?rgaruzanon:;� .orn�cdtzon:<>::?<}::<:{ <:;i}}r.;iri:::{}}>..;:”-r:'><.}r -`- Name of Organization - PosT LidLit Business Address dof Organization or P.0 Box(Do not use the address of your gambling manager) 1 Val E 3�'4 ve State Zip Code County Daytime phone number , . i>;: City (lal� y45-79J� _ <._ 'hAKQPte MN- .55379 Scd� Daytime phone number - -' "- Name of chief executive officer(cannot be your gambling manager) Title (� n C ,oder (? Ia )1t45-L1 7C - -_ (,�oN .417/h��m 7:•_: ',W.. Bingo Occasions -__ If applying for a class A or C permit. fill in days and beginning & ending hours of bingo occasions: No more than seven bingo occasions may be conducted by your organization per week Hours t: Beginning/EndingHours Day Beginning/Ending�r_��--: Day Beginning/Ending Hours Day to to to i'.'_ - to to to to If bingo will not be conducted,check here orf• •r.. rM ... ..................................... r• ,„ :w:!i... r.:...f...:.:'i}i:}::�v:'i:?:4ii::'::4:i:: -.. W r:6}C .!•:K.. ,::::. ...fir....... .. .... .. ........ 1:065:#. � .. ...: ...... .., ..................:::::.::::::::::i:Cii:4::i}:?•:ii::???�::'}}i::h}i:•i:f.vyih 4;•:-})}}i:�.v.ih?- ......... ...... . :.a:'r e-o::. .. Street Address(do not use a post office box number) _ Name of establishment wh\er/e ambling will be conducted I' /�.T nue C C)e,erS a JorganizedG unorganized [� unincorporated Is the premises located within city limits? ]Yes 0 No If no,is township = in '`” : City and County where gambling premises is located OR Township and County where gambling premises is located if outside of city limits { ;s' .. -77,44-pre e .SCo Tr ff�� State Zip Code Name and dddressJof legal owner of premises ) I )C Ave. C 5��� MN. 537 of ga�.sxn own vc. Ltdd E Does your organization own a building where the gambling will be conduc' ? [� YES rk NO If no,attach the following: • a copy of the lease(form LG202)with terms for at least one year. • a copy of a sketch of the floor plan with dimensions,showing what portion is being leased. A lease and sketch are not required for Class D applications. . � .:.. .... :3merit,: Da�tu$eaf�boxmf . .. .. . .. ,.: ;l��tiress.�ofatoragespace o£gamblia equip Address City State Zip code .7'�: 18g5 EA3JeCeeK8I vdj S Kapee ) �N• X379 f. • �r�3 79 ,''-_,n: -- . 9. I 1 1st. Ave. E. t Sti�xQ�ee , AI :per Minnesota Lawful Gambling Application - Part 2 of 2 ----_--17:7-L-_-_ -:•:= ----:- . _,- Premise Permit pp . ire.., — Y:'f.%�';%S:>ii�y`.{�" uYsa"`d''ri<S �.- � -. .9?.aYiM.ti.;. ' vy� » . . . < . g .. . ;iarm. J4tanM � vrmvivl` 'k:;/!n.v ;:.n� ,`<�Kn.Svii ..fg. ��: S n.a r .. .; q rv .< .�.} r:-'..•. .:,:f.::Y .r...y. , .. Bank Account Number Bank Name Ar -e AN K SLA xope - City state Zip Cede sank Address I Ar_SG.hA11 R ee,.. A 79 • 2.�..C:.<Y<-.,...-,!z.::{rt;,�.....,-�. ..4•�-�.pK� ililq.i7i:.�.. .:....:rte:::::::::........ �'A"..,:•Y:?�..- :-::.a„<. _... _:r..r,.n:5 .....r.�..:...... ,. .. -- ^�: .. ,r.:w::Y.,::.::>..-::.Nanta,., :-::•::,_ .s:.�,�•�x--•�r:: ,>;..•-.;:r...:::;c;{:::-..:::.. ......... Raw•,.rn:?�:�r:-??:::•Y:r;r.;<�.,:`.:?•3^:�+5:{'y-.:.-:y.,.y:;<ay»..;:,,..,;.�„r: ,..:�::.....Elll�a~ _.. � <::•;:�::a�::::::.�r.�:.,5"'r:r}?-.;:�,., ..p:i,.:n,.:{r;.,r.<:.r:6�.-� t/QriS. tr913S Sma}t./}O t harsdfe $'it1iF�S Name -.; Title µ .• ^� Rol S;��Ko�ee��N•5 3 9l o �1 �A l� {1 cam.1 n� - i�o� ,�n• /'I AY'4 r. 1'] 1 1 d• � 5 7 C ,,,MA EJ er,Ie ' .Q01 So, W°IIow31- eellIPlA v0,AN.36oI/ nib , r <: _- ....r .... ......... .. vv.r.v.,...n .... r.........::••,.......v.v:A::::n....,..v-•.,n:,,..,...•.:r.:.v.........n....... ... eci emeat ..r... ........ • Gambling Site Authorization •I am the chief executive officer of the organization; '71 I hereby consent that local law enforcement officers,the •1 assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful opera-_ . - = board or agents of the board,or the commissioner of tion of all activities to be conducted; revenue or public safety,or agents of the commissioners, -1 will familiarize myself with the laws of Minnesota may enter the premises to enforce the law. governing lawful gambling and rules of the board and Bank Records Information agree,if licensed,to abide by those laws and rules, -;The board is authorized to inspect the bank records of the including amendments to them; gambling account whenever necessary to fulfill •any changes in application information will be submitted ` .- requirements of current gambling rules and law. to the board and local unit of government within 10 days -^ Oath of the change;and - I declare that: •I understand that failure to-provide required information _ •I have read this application and all information submitted or providing false or misleading information may result in -= to the board is true, accurate and complete; the denial or revocation of the license. s •all other required information has been fully disclosed; Date • :' Signature of chief executive officer _ �: -•: -•.••,�,�.•i v?% '3G::c::ib}:'-'”:: rkt,Y-u�.?3S�..},{;�'.,-{YG”." 3 !, s�°� ..............::,::•::::.•:r.:.......... ..:'r.>?.��rfky •).k�v`rf':;M�,.'{KL���• 4 •d�CS �k•: .. .........:... .......-...,..r.....::.r.r...,r-.n' }. - �i..4'} �' ,�S>. .J.-. . ''?,. ,.rv, .;•, n......... . .........r......... .........: :... ......... .................. ,.:n.?.-:$}:.y0C7};;1}.n..Yiy{x.::;{<.,Lr•Y ............. ............. I,oca1. fr�avernment�Pkno�te_ . tt. 4. A coon of the local unit of oovernment's resolution ao- -4.1375 : =- 1. The city'must sign this application if the gambling prem- proving this eoolication must be attached to this application, :� . ises is located within city limits. 5. If this application is denied by the local unit of government, 2. The county**AND township**mist sign this application if it should not be submitted to the Gambling Control Board. ' -- the gambling premises is located within a township. or county) mustpass a 3. The local unit government(city Township: By signature below,the township acknowledges resolution specifically approving or denying this application. that the organization is applying for a premises permit within township limits. City' or County" Township" • 43-: Township Name City or County Name ' CITY of SJfiikDOe _-. Signature of person receiving applicationlication ;'�,- - ,: Signature of1pe�rson re ivin -.' I Title ! Date Received . ,. Title Date Received g l 'xA ((:)Ai eQ..) 2 ,, , A3 �_ _ L -. . • Refer to th . structions for required attachments. 7, Mail to: Gambling Control Board • Rosewood Plaza South,3rd Floor „�. 1711 W.County Road B LG214(Part 2) (Rav7 Roseville, UN 55113 2491) 1 ) MEMO TO: DENNIS KRAFT, CITY ADMINIJTRATOR FROM: DAVE HUTTON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ALLEY GRADER DATE: FEBRUARY 22 , 1993 INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting authorization to advertise for bids for a new alley grader. BACKGROUND Due to the large number of gravel alleys in Shakopee, an alley grader is an essential piece of Laintenance equipment for the Public Works Department. There are over 7 miles of gravel alleys in the City. The full size Caterpillar road grader used on the gravel streets is too large for the narrow gravel alleys. Typically, all gravel alleys are graied a minimum of twice per year and often up to 3 or 4 times per sea::on. The alley grader is also an essential piece of equipment fo= leveling asphalt for street patching and is used quite extensively during the summers. It can also be used for miscellaneous park grading and landscaping. In 1989 the Public Works Department purchased a used 1978, Raygo alley grader for approximately $6000. Upon purchase, an additional $4000 was spent to purchase parts to make this equipment operable. Since the initial purchase, the amo',int of maintenance required to keep this vehicle operational h :s far exceeded the normal anticipated maintenance costs. Beczase of these maintenance costs and the amount of down time associa.:ed with this equipment, staff requested and received permission to include a new alley grader in the 1993 Capital Equipment Budget. The 1993 Public Works Capital Equipmcnt Budget includes $60, 000 for the purchase of a new alley grader. The specifications for the alley grader have been completed and are attached for City Council approval. Staff is requesting authorization to advertise for bids for the new grader. The 1978 Raygo grader would be traded in as part of the new purchase. The bid opening is scheduled for March 25, 1993 . ALTERNATIVES 1. Authorize staff to advertise fo bids for an alley grader as outlined in the specifications. 2 . Authorize staff to advertise for bids for an alley grader, but revise or amend the specifications as directed by Council. 3 . Deny the request. 4 . Table the request for additional information from staff. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED Move to authorize the advertisement for bids for an alley grader as outlined in the attached specifications. CITY OF SHA::OPEE NOTICE OF ADVERTISLAENT FOR BIDS FOR ONE (1) NEW MOTOR GRADER (ALLEY MAINTAINER) BIDS CLOSE MARC:: 25, 1993 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: The City of Shakopee will receive bids at the office of the City Clerk until 10: 00 a.m. , on March 25, 1993 , at which time they will be publicly opened in the council Chambers of the City Hall, 129 South Holmes, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379, by the City Clerk and Public Works Dir=ector or their designees and will then be tabulated and will be considered by the Council for: ONE (1) NEW MOTOR GRADER (ALLEY MAINTAINER) according to the specifications cn file in the office of the City Clerk, 129 South Holmes, Shalcpee, Minnesota 55379 or the office of the Public Works, 500 Gor. .an Street. Each bid must be accompanied If cash, certified check, or bid and performance bond acceptabl : to the City in an amount equal to at least five (5%) percent ,)f the total amount of the bid, payable without condition to U. City of Shakopee. The security shall be subject to forfeiture in the event the equipment is not furnished by the date specifi .d, if the bidder is designated by the City Council as the lowest re; ponsible bidder and a purchase order is executed by the Public Wor. :s Director. The City of Shakopee reservc3 the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any informal..ties or irregularities herein as they deem to be in the best inte. est of the City. By order of the City Council: JUD::TH S. COX CIT CLERK INSTRUCTION TO BIDDERS 1. GENERAL A. INTENT OF CONTRACT It is the intent of these specification to describe a new Motor Grader as furnished. It is the intent of the City not to be restrictive to any one manufacturer, however, the unit desired must meet the enclosed standard and any unit furnished which does not comply with the specifications will be rejected and returned to the bidder. All units bid shall be current production model machines furnished as specified and ready to operate. All parts required for a complete unit and necessary for safe operation shall be furnished. It shall be equipped with the equipment and published literature for the unit. The complete unit as furnished shall meet all current federal highway safety standards and all current OSHA requirements. Catalog information showing the make, model and complete specifications of the unit the bidder proposes to furnish shall accompany the bid. If the bidder' s proposal is not in strict accordance with these specifications, the bidder must so indicate and describe any deviations in his proposal. It is the intent of the City not to be restrictive to any one manufacturer. However, the unit desired must meet the enclosed standards, and any unit furnished which does not comply with the specifications will be rejected and returned to the bidder. Bidder shall supply the City with names and address to other cities or construction companies, preferably in the 7 county metro area, who have the type of machine that is being bid so the City can inspect a similar unit and possibly drive it before bid opening day. B. WARRANTY The successful bidder shall guarantee the unit and appurtenances for a period of at least 1 (one) year from the date of delivery. Any manufacturers warranties which exceed the 1 year period shall also apply. All warranties proposed by these specification and proposal shall apply where applicable. The supplier shall guarantee the machine against defective materials and/or workmanship. Any material found defective within the guarantee period shall be replaced at the manufacturer' s expense including labor. C. SERVICE The bidder shall state in his proposal the location of the nearest stock of repair parts or servicemen who may be called if required. 1. D. DELIVERY The successful bidder shall deliver the complete unit ready for operation to the Public Works Dept. , 500 Gorman St. , Shakopee, Minnesota. Bidder shall state delivery date or delivery under this contract must be made within ninety (90) days following contract award. E. PAYMENT Payment will be made within 30 days following the acceptance of the equipment received. The trade-in machine will be available at the time of delivery of the new machine, with 24 hours notice. F. NON-DISCRIMINATION The contractor shall be in compliance with all applicable federal and state statutes and the City of Shakopee' s affirmative action program regarding non-discrimination and equal employment opportunity. Failure to comply with such statutes and/or affirmative action program may lead to the non-award of the contract or once a contract has been let, the cancellation of such contract. G. TAX EXEMPTION The City of Shakopee is subject to State sales tax only. H. IN SERVICE TRAINING A trained factory representative shall provide the City with training and instruction in the operation and maintenance of the unit at no cost to the City. I . MANUALS The successful bidder shall furnish the City with: 2 operator' s manuals lubrication chart 2 parts manuals 2 complete service and repair manuals J. AWARDS Award of contract by the City of Shakopee will be based upon but not necessarily limited to the factors of (1) Price; (2) Parts and service; (3) Analysis and comparison of specifications details; (4) Delivery date; and (5) Past experience with similar or related equipment. It is the intent of the City of Shakopee to award the bid to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the specifications, provided that the bid has been submitted in accordance with the bid requirements. 2 . The City reserves the right tc waive any informality or irregularity in any bid received; a: 3 to award the bid which is in the best interest of the City.The C ty Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Bids w: 11 be opened at 10: 00 a.m. on March 25, 1993 at which time they w:; .1 be reviewed, tabulated, and then considered by the Council for award the following scheduled Council meeting date. K. TRADE-IN The City will trade-in one used Rego Razor Motor Grader, Model Razor 350, Serial #72B0170D equipped with front back fill blade and moldboard blade, which may be ir. .pected at the Public Works Building at 500 Gorman Street, Shakopee, Minnesota, phone 612-445-2211. This unit is conside::ed to be in good condition. L. BIDS Proposals or bids must be written a: .d conform to the form hereto attached and directed to the City o2 Shakopee, Minnesota. All bids must be sealed and marked "BID ON MOTOR GRADER" and must be accompanied by a certified check, cash or bid and performance bond payable to the City of Shakope :, for not less than five (5%) percent of the total bid price. In case the successful bidder fails :o furnish the equipment by the time frame desired by the City, the : acurity (certified check, cash or bond) shall be forfeited to the City as liquidated damages. The bidder shall not stipulate in h'.s proposal any conditions not contained in the contract condition, prescribed by the City. The City reserves the right to hold all bids for ninety (90) days. 3 . CITY OF SHAKOPEE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BID SPECIFICATION FOR ONE (1) NEW ARTICULATED MOTOR GRADER INTENT OF CONTRACT: Furnish and deliver to the City of Shakopee, Public Works Department one (1) new MOTOR GRADER (Alley Maintainer) meeting or exceeding the specifications in this proposal. Bid price to include the cost of the new machine LESS trade-in of one used unit. GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS: Units bid shall be currently advertised and produced models with all the latest changes and features offered as standard whether called for in these specifications or not, except where specifications call for a substitute feature or item in lieu of manufacturer' s standard. WEIGHT: The basic operating weight of each machine, without additional equipment, shall not be less than 9, 500 lbs. Specify weights of the following: Basic Machine Weight: Additional Equipment: Cab Weight: Front Mount-Back Fill Blade Weight: TOTAL WEIGHT OF MACHINE ENGINE: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Displacement: Not less than 144 C. I.D. Cylinders: Not less than 4 cylinders Cycles: Four (4) Horsepower: Not less than 55 H.P. Fuel: Capable of operating on #2 diesel fuel. Fuel tank capacity: 25 gallons minimum. Air cleaner: Safety element dry-type 2-stage, if possible, with service indicator. Muffler: Low noise type. Rain cap on exhaust stack if discharged vertically. Starting aids: Low temperature assistance such as glow plugs. Anti-freeze: To -40 degrees F. Block Heater: Frost plug type 110 volt TRANSMISSION: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Type: Hydrostatic drive, with one handle operating forward and reverse. Will except manual 4 speed selected transmission coupled to a velvet shuttle type power drive. 4 . REAR AXLE: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Shall have dual oscillating rear tandem drive axle. Shall oscillate l2' . Ground clearance to be a minimum of 8" . Differential type gearing shall match with type of transmission on the machine excepted. BRAKES: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Operating brakes shall have hydraulic disc type. PARKING BRAKE: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Shall have emergency disc type. STEERING: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Type: Articulated. Assistance: Indicator to show degree of articulation. Wheel Lean: 10 degrees left or right, hydraulically controlled. Articulation: 27° to 37' left to right and hydraulically controlled. Turning radius: Maximum 20 feet with steering and articulation. Steering Column: Adjustable with all controls at finger tips. Steering: Full power. HYDRAULICS: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Type: Constant response at all engine speeds. Minimum 10 gallon/minute pump. Filter: Full flow with magnet. Hydro tank shall be no less than 25 gallons capacity with magnet and screen. Temperature gauges numbers and low oil level indicator. Oil cooler mounted in front of radiator. Shall provide hydro blade float for front blade. MOLDBOARD: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Length: Minimum 8 ' - Maximum 10 ' Height: Minimum 12" - Maximum 16" Cutting edges: 5/8 thick with bolt pattern to match those of cutting edges that the city uses, punched holes in blade and moldboard. Blade lift: Above ground level minimum 10" . Blade cut below ground level (minimum 4") . Blade side shift minimum 30" . Blade shall have a forward pitch function hydraulic, if possible. Blade rotation left or right 45° . Blade shall have down pressure minimum 4500 lbs P.S. I. All blade functions should be hydraulically controlled except where noted above. FRONT MOUNTED BLADE: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Length: 7 feet minimum. 5. Height: 24" maximum. Cutting edge 5/8"x6"x7 ' pattern of punched holes in blade and moleboard shall match those used by the City at this time. Lifting height above ground level minimum 12" . Hydraulic system for front blade shall have pressure up and down, and down float detent for back dragging. FILTRATION: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Engine oil, 10 micron. Engine air filter dry type. Stage II, if possible. Fuel, 10 micron and a water separator - can be combined. If hydrostatic or shuttle type transmission 10 micron. Hydraulics 10 micron. TIRES : Shall be as follows: Six 15 x 38 . 5 - 15 It floatation type. Directional tires. CAB: Shall have the following preferred specifications: Cab shall be F.O.P.S. and R.O.P.S. meeting S.A.E. specifications. Doors: Lockable handles (vandalism protection) Windows: Tinted glass, if possible. Wipers: Front and rear. Heater: High output. Defroster fan. Air conditioning - pressurized cab. Foot Pedal accelerator and hand throttle. Insulating and sound suppression materials. Seat belts. Dome light. Grab handle on cab. Back up alarm. Top cab head lights Front and rear lights for T/S - Flashers - Stop lights Horn One Back up light rear of cab switched with transmission directional handle. Full set of gauges: Fuel Amp Engine oil Engine Temperature Hour meter Hydro Fluid level or low level light Hydro Fluid Temperature Instrument panel lights. Blue Strobe light, top of cab. Slow moving vehicle sign. Console inside cab shall be adjustable being able to pull it to and away from operator. All hydraulic controls and hand throttle should be at finger tips. 6. PAINT: Manufactures ' s standard color yellow. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM: System: 12 volt. Alternator: 50 amps minimum. Battery: Heavy duty. Shock resistant. Lights: Two headlights - cab mounted. Front and rear turning signals with 4-way flashers, stop lights. Cab dome light. Instrument panel light. Blue strobe, top cab mounted, Warn-A-Lite type or equal. Back up alarm - electric. All electrical function shall turn off with key. MANUALS: Two operator' s manuals; two complete shop repair manuals of all components; two parts books. All manuals to be delivered to the City before payment will be made. MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION: A complete set of manufacturer's specification and illustrated descriptions shall be furnished with the bid. GUARANTEED MAINTENANCE: The vendor contractor hereby agrees to furnish all parts and labor required to keep each unit in good operating condition for 1 years or 1, 000 hours, whichever comes first. In addition, the warranty repairs shall be handled as follows: There will be no charge for the first year repairs except for normal day-to-day consumed items (oil, filter, grease, etc. ) EXTENDED SERVICE PLAN: Shall give copy of specific' s of what is covered and how long, parts and labor. MAINTENANCE: The Shakopee Public Works Department agrees to provide such preventative maintenance and daily and monthly services as described by the manufacturer. SERVICE FACILITIES-DOWN TIME: The bidder will certify that he maintains an adequate stock of parts and employs qualified servicemen within the area available. TRAINING PERIOD: The successful bidder agrees to provide a training program for City employees, at time of delivery in sufficient scope to assure efficient and economical performance and maintenance of the equipment. The successful bidder shall perform the first scheduled maintenance checking over machine which will include the training program for the maintenance persons at the City maintenance Department. 7. CITY OF SHAKOPEE BID PROPOSAL FORM 1. MAKE & MODEL OF EQUIPMENT BEING BID: COST $ 2 . LESS TRADE-IN TOTAL TRADE VALUE $ (-) 3 . PURCHASER PAYS ONLY THIS AMOUNT $ This total will determine the best total bid available to the City for a contract. 4 . OPTIONAL EXTENDED SERVICE PLAN $ DELIVERY DATE DAYS AFTER AWARD NOTE: Bidder must bid on all items and will be paid only Item #3 . Failure to bid on all items will disqualify bid. Respectfully submitted, Printed Name of Bidder: Signature of Bidder: Address of Bidder: Telephone Number: State whether bidder is: Individual: Firm: Partnership: By: Names of Partners: Titles: Address: Corporation: Telephone Number: State in which incorporated: Bid and performance security in the amount of 5% of the Base Bid accompanies this proposal, the same being subject to forfeiture in the event the equipment is not furnished by the date specified, if the undersigned is designated by the City Council as the lowest responsible bidder and a purchase order is executed by the Public Works Director. 8. MEMO TO: DENNIS KRAFT, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DAVE HUTTON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: HIGH PRESSURE SEWER JETTER DATE: FEBRUARY 22 , 1993 INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting authorization to advertise for bids for a high pressure sewer jetter. BACKGROUND The 1993 Sanitary Sewer Enterprise Fund has $45, 000 in the Capital Equipment Budget for a high pressure sewer jetter. This equipment is needed to replace the current sewer rodder, which is an antiquated piece of equipment and more dangerous to operate than a sewer jetter. The rodder is on a 1958 Dodge truck. Currently, the department has one jetter, purchased in 1992 (replacing an old jetter) , and the rodder. The jetter is used for normal maintenance and flushing, but if there are any obstructions, roots or blockages, the jetter cannot clean out the line. Therefore, either a rodder is needed or a high pressure jetter. Based on the departments review of current technologies, it is recommended that a high pressure, water jetter be purchased rather than another rodder. The high pressure jetter operates at an extremely high pressure (4000 psi) and can cut through any type of tree roots, grease build up, obstructions, etc. It is also a much safer and more efficient than a rodder. In addition, it can be used as a low pressure jetter similar to the 1992 jetter. Due to the growth of the City and increase in sewer mileage it is no longer possible to perform the necessary routine maintenance of the sewers, in an acceptable time frame, with a single jetter. The high pressure fetter will allow a second crew to perform the routine cleaning, while still having the high pressure capability for blockages and tree roots. The high pressure jetter can also be equipped with other attachments making it a multi-use equipment, which can be used for such things as cleaning walls in the park shelters and comfort stations, stripping paint, cleaning swimming pools, eliminating graffiti, cleaning parking lots, etc. If purchase of the new jetter •is authorized, it is proposed to retain the rodder for 1 year to see if there is any demand for that equipment and the frequency for which it is needed. If it is evident that it is not needed, it would be sold at the next appropriate auction. The only occasion where the rodder may be useful is to assist in pushing out the T.V. camera, which periodically gets stuck in a defective sewer line every so often. Without a rodder,the sewer line would need to be excavated to retrieve the City' s T.V. camera. Eince the rodder is completely paid for, it may be beneficial to retain it for that purpose and it could be considered an insurance policy against expensive "dig ups" . The annual cost to retain the rodder are very minimal, compared to the possibility of one sewer dig up. Attached are the final specification for the high pressure jetter for City Council approval. The specifications are for a truck mounted, high pressure jetter. Staff is requesting authorization to advertise for bids for this equipment. ALTERNATIVES 1. Authorize staff to advertise fo_ bids for a high pressure jetter as outlined in the speci2ications. 2 . Authorize staff to advertise ft:* bids for a high pressure jetter, but revise or amend the specifications as directed by Council. 3 . Deny the request. 4 . Table the request for additional information from staff. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED Move to authorize the advertisement for bids for a high pressure jetter as outlined in the attached specifications. CITY OF SHAKOPEE NOTICE OF ADVERTISE/ ENT FOR BIDS FOR ONE (1) NEW 1993 MODEL TRUCK COMPLETE LITH NEW HIGH PRESSURE UEWER CLEANER BIDS CLOSE MARC:I 25, 1993 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: The City of Shakopee will receive bids at the office of the City Clerk until 10: 00 a.m. on March 25, 1993 at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 129 South Holme:: Street, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 , by the City Clerk, Public Wo::ks Director or their Designee and will then be tabulated and will be considered by the Council for: ONE (1) NEW 1993 I. DDEL TRUCK COMPLETE y ITH NEW HIGH PRESSURE E3WER CLEANER according to the specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk, 129 South Holmes Street, Shzkopee, Minnesota 55379 or the office of the Public Works Director, 500 Gorman St. , Shakopee, MN 55379 . Each bid must be accompanied by cas:i, certified check, or bid and performance bond acceptable to the City in an amount equal to at least five (5%) percent of the tot it amount of the bid, payable without condition to the City of Sh .kopee. The security shall be subject to forfeiture in the event ,:he equipment is not furnished by the date specified, if the bidc:.ar is designated by the City Council as the lowest responsible lidder and a purchase order is executed by the Public Works Director. The City of Shakopee reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any informalities or irregularities herein as they deem to be in the best interest of the City. By order of the City Council: JUDITH S. COX CITY CLERK CITY OF SHAKOPEE NOTICE OF BIDS ONE (1) NEW 1993 MODEL TRUCK COMPLETE WITH NEW HIGH PRESSURE SEWER CLEANER I . GENERAL It is the purpose of the specifications to establish minimum quality and performance standard for: One (1) New 1993 Model Truck Complete with One (1) New High Pressure Sewer Cleaner Any bid in which a bidder has failed to show without a doubt that he is quoting on a model regularly manufactured and described below will not be considered. The vehicle and sewer cleaner shall be equipped with all standard equipment, as currently advertised by the manufacturer, whether or not specifically mentioned in this specification. Any exceptions or variations from the specifications must be noted in the proposal . SERVICE AND WARRANTY The bidder shall furnish a standard Manufacturer' s Service and Warranty Policy, and shall pay any costs of inspection or adjustment that may be necessary, as provided by said Setvke Policy. List where service is available. DELIVERY The Vehicle and Sewer Cleaner shall be delivered F.O.B. to the City of Shakopee for acceptance, subject to the City' s inspection and approval. Delivery should be within 120 days. M.S.O. to be submitted upon delivery. The successful bidder will provide a qualified service representative for a minimum of sixteen (16) hours during regular City working hours, to instruct City personnel on the operation and maintenance of the unit. Of these 16 hours; 8 hours will accompany truck arrival and acceptance; 4 hours during first schedule truck maintenance; and 4 hours at request during the first year of operation of the unit. Payment terms 30 days net after delivery. 1. GUARANTEE The successful bidder shall guarantee the equipment against defective material or workmanship for a period of one year from date of final acceptance by the City. Any material found defective within the guaranteed period shall be replaced, at the manufacturer' s and/or supplier' s expense. MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS Complete manufacturer' s specifications shall be submitted with each bid. Insufficient descriptive information may be cause for rejection of the bid. SERVICE MANUALS Two complete shop manuals, two parts manuals and two operations manuals shall be furnished for the sewer cleaner. One complete shop manual and operations manual for truck. The Truck and Sewer Cleaner must comply with all OSHA safety standards. All illustration drawings may be required before the bid is accepted. BID DEPOSIT A certified check, cash or a bid and performancebond is required to be submitted with the bid in the amount of 5% of the total base bid. The bid deposits of unsuccessful bidders will be returned when a contract has been awarded or thirty (30) days after the bid opening, whichever comes first. The bid deposit of the successful bidder will be returned after the contract has been awarded and the performance bond received. II. QUALIFICATIONS OF BIDDERS/APPROVED EQUAL To gain consideration as an "approved equal" , the prospective bidder must make available to the City for its use the same model of the piece of equipment it intends to bid as an "approved equal" . This equipment shall be furnished at least five (5) working days prior to the opening date of bids. The equipment must be available for demonstration by the City during that period so the City can evaluate its performance. In addition, the prospective bidder shall furnish a list of cities in the State of Minnesota, preferably in the seven county metropolitan area who are currently operating the model of machine intended to be considered as an "approved equal" . 2 . Following the review of the unit and the information furnished, the City will notify the prospective supplier of an "approved equal" unit whether or not it will be accepted for bidding and whether or not it meets specifications. The notification shall be given at least two (2) days prior to the opening of bids. III . SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW 1993 MODEL TRUCK shall be the following preferred specifications: CAB Conventional cab. Ford 450 or Equal. Insulated head liner. Insulated rubber floor mat. Extra insulated sound package (for engine noise) . Tinted glass. GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT 14 , 500 lbs. minimum. CAB TO AXLE 84 inches. WHEEL BASE 161 inches. FRONT AXLE 5, 000 lbs. minimum. FRONT SPRINGS 5, 000 lbs. minimum. REAR AXLE 11, 000 lbs. minimum - single speed geared for 65 mph top speed. REAR SPRINGS 11, 000 lbs. minimum with heavy duty auxiliary springs. ENGINE 160 HP at 7 . 3L Ford diesel 420 C. I.D. or equal. ENGINE EQUIPMENT Spin on Fuel Filter. Standard Fuel Water Separator. Full Flow Oil Filter Dry Type Air Filter with Restriction Gauge. Fan Clutch. Silicone Hoses. High Temperature, Low Oil Shut Down (if possible) . Electric Key Engine Shut Down. Inline Fuel Heater. Electric Block Heater. Full Range Governor, if possible. BATTERIES H.D. 12 volt. 3 . RADIATOR Heavy duty over-standard, extra cooling. Permanent antifreeze to not less than -40 degrees F. EXHAUST Single RH horizontal muffler and vertical pipe with heat guard or frame mounted to rear of truck vented on right side, away from operator. ALTERNATOR 90 Amp. minimum. TRANSMISSION Automatic Three (3 ) Speed Transmission (no over drive) , if possible. Complete with external cooler. STEERING Power. Complete with cooler. BRAKES H.D. front disc, H.D. rear drum all power brakes. If possible, rear should be disc brakes. EMERGENCY BRAKE Pedal and cable type. GAUGES Full package - amp, oil, temperature, fuel, tachometer and hour meter. Hour meter to be started with oil pressure switch from engine. FUEL TANK Largest single tank available. HORNS Dual. LIGHTS Clearance lights top of cab. DOME LIGHT MAP LIGHT WINDSHIELD WIPER Two speed and intermittent wipers and washers. MIRRORS Dual West Coast. Left and right 8x12 . TIRES (6) L.T. 235/85R Radial Tubeless. Front standard thread - Rears mud and snow. TURN SIGNALS Self canceling. HEATER AND DEFROSTER Largest available. Silicone hoses. BACK UP ALARM Electric. 4. WHEELS Disc type. 16 x 6. COLOR Blue - inside and outside of cab. Manufacturer' s Standard to match closest to what City has on other vehicles. SEAT Heavy duty vinyl full width bench seat. SUN VISORS Left and right hand. RADIO AM-FM push button. IV. SPECIFICATIONS FOR A NEW 1993 HIGH PRESSURE SEWER CLEANER GENERAL It is the intent of these specifications to describe the minimum requirements for a truck mounted high pressure hydraulic sewer cleaner designed to use high pressure water jets in storm sanitary and combines sewers, pipe drains and other conduits to remove obstructions, sand, solidified grease, roots and other materials. The units, including all necessary equipment shall be complete and ready for use. All parts not specifically mentioned which form part of the complete unit shall conform in design, strength and quality of material and workmanship to the highest standards of engineering practice. The high pressure sewer cleaning unit shall be the manufacturer' s standard as may be modified to meet these specifications. It shall be equipped with the manufacturer' s equipment and accessories which are in the advertisement and published literature for the unit. Standard product items removed must be stated in the bid. All equipment and components shall be bid new and unused. Machine is to be serviced and ready for operation upon delivery. The sewer cleaning unit when fully loaded, including a full tank of water, shall be certified not to exceed chassis specifications for front and rear axle weights. Dealer and manufacturer shall provide a one year warranty minimum, parts and service included for machine and accessories F.O.B. at the City of Shakopee. Exceptions taken must be listed on a separate sheet entitled "Exceptions to Specifications. " Failure to list separately 5. may result in disqualification. A field demonstration of the unit bid is required before bid opening date. The successful vendor will be required to provide a minimum of 16 hours of operation and maintenance instructions upon delivery of the unit. It is the responsibility of the successful bidder to install the Sewer Cleaner as part of the bid price. TANK - Shall have the following preferred specifications. The unit shall contain one water tank, the capacity of which shall be no more than 600 gallons and will enable the pump to run at full pressure and flow for a minimum of 35 minutes. Increase in tank capacity to allow 30 minutes of operation time will not be acceptable. Construction shall be heavy duty plastic with UV light and crack resistant protection. The tank shall contain a baffle which shall act as a stiffener and reduce sloshing and distortions. An overhead type tank filling assembly with a 2" fire hydrant fitting shall be located at the curbside. An adaptor to convert from 2" hydrant fitting to a 3/4" garden hose shall be supplied. A positive air gap antisiphon system shall be incorporated to protect the portable water supply. The tank shall contain a 2" spherical valve to enable easy gravity draining of water. Shall have a water level gauge showing level of water, full to empty on the control panel. The tank shall be vented and shall have fully removable lid to permit inspection and access into the tank. PUMP - Shall have the following preferred specifications. The pump shall be of radial piston diaphragm design or triplex plunger type. The pump shall be capable of continuous operation at 4000 lbs. maximum designed pressure and must be capable of running dry without damage. The pump shall be capable of producing 4 , 000 psi and a maximum flow of 15 - 20 g.p.m. CONTROLS All gauge switches, control levers, etc. necessary for the operation of the unit and engine shall be on the right side of 6. the hose reel so that the operator has complete control of the cleaning operation while working from one location. All gauges and controls shall be within easy reach from the operator' s station while operating machine. The following instruments and controls shall be included as standard on the control panel. Keyed ignition switch, throttle control, pressure gauge for water system, engine oil pressure gauge, engine tachometer, engine temperature gauge, ammeter, hour meter, to start with engine oil pressure. Shall have a water level gauge showing level of water, full to empty. Instrument light in each gauge. Work light at top of control panel lighting total panel. All lights, electrically controlled equipment shall turn off with key. Diesel fuel to be plumbed from truck fuel tank. High pressure/recirculating selector control valve. Lever for controlling the speed and direction of the hose reel shall be positioned comfortably for the operator when watching hose in man hole etc. Shall have a pressure gauge showing hydraulic oil pressure for hose reel when reel is rotating in forward or reverse positions. Again, operator shall be able to see gauge comfortably when operating machine, if possible. HOSE REEL The hose reel shall be designed to withstand maximum working pressure without distortion. Shall have a footage meter for hose and shall work in both directions and be 99% accurate. Capacity of the hose reel shall not be less than 700 ft. of 1/2" high pressure hose. The reel shall be driven by hydraulic power in both directions. The hydraulic drive shall have sufficient power to retract the hose when fully extended with the sewer cleaning jet in operation. The unit shall be equipped with 700 ft. of continuous length reinforced plastic hose with 10 ft. of safety leader hose. 14 , 000 P.S .I. minimum burst. 7 . Shall have a automatic hands free, level wind. The level wind shall automatically wind the hose while the hose reel is in forward or reverse rotation, if possible. HOSE REEL DRIVE SYSTEM The hydraulic power for powering the hose reel shall be by means of a pump driven from the auxiliary engine; a direction and speed control working valve and hydraulic hose rated to withstand the maximum system pressure. The oil filter shall be the return type and have a replaceable cartridge type filter. The oil reservoir tank shall have a capacity adequate to operate machine. Oil cooler shall be installed if needed. SEWER CLEANING HOSE The hose shall have minimal I.D. of 1/2" , and minimum burst pressure of 14 , 000 psi. Shall supply tiger tail hose protector. PIPING All piping subjected to high pressure shall have a minimum burst pressure of 14, 000 psi. A strainer of the in-line type with 80 mesh screen shall be installed in the suction line at a location permitting easy accessibility for cleaning. ENGINE - AUXILIARY The engine shall be a Diesel minimum 40 HP water cooled, preferred. Air cooled will be exceptable. The following accessories shall be furnished: 12 volt keyed ignition system with battery charging alternator and ammeter. Lockable variable speed throttle control cable. Governor. Replaceable cartridge type oil filter. Exhaust shall be vented vertically and have weather cap. Lubricating oil consumption shall be less than 0.75% of full load fuel consumption. 8 . The engine shall have a continuous rating of 40 hp minimum. The engine fuel shall be taken from the truck fuel tank. Fuel system shall have a fuel heater inline. BODY ENCLOSURE Shall have a fully enclosed body, F.R.P. Fiberglass reinforced plywood or A.R.P. aluminum reinforced plywood, is acceptable. Must have rear operator door with gas cylinders, if possible. Left and right hand over head roll top doors for easy access and maintenance. Body enclosure shall have a warranty covering the unit against any defects cracking, etc. Minimum of 2 years. Shall have 2 lights mounted inside top of enclosure and switch at the operator' s control panel for repair and service inside enclosure. Two 24" long tool boxs, mounted on the left side and on the right side of body below bed. Shall be aluminum or noncorrosive materials. Tools purchased for this machine shall have a storage area supplied (tool boxes) , either in the tool boxes in front of the rear axle of inside of body enclosure. HIGH PRESSURE HAND GUN SYSTEM Piping for the hand gun system shall be provided as standard, including a quick-disconnect fitting located near the control panel . A high pressure hand gun with a "dead man" trigger, complete with 25 foot 1/2" I.D. high pressure hose shall be furnished with quick disconnect fitting. A relief valve, independent of the sewer cleaning relief valve shall regulate pressure through the hand gun at 1000 PSI for operator safety at full throttle. It shall be adjustable from 0-1000 PSI. This valve shall be of the repairable type. PAINTING Before painting, all metal shall be sand blasted. The unit shall be primed and painted the same color as the truck. 9 . OPTIONS 1. Three high efficiency nozzles. 3 - rear, 1 forward 4 - rear 6 - rear 1 - 8 inch skid 2 . Mini Jet Kit consisting of 100 feet of 1/4" I.D. high pressure hose with 1/4" JIC Ball Jet - 3 rear 1 forward with adapter to go to 1/2 " hose. 3 . One set of Drain jet Extensions - 9" and 18" . 4 . Double Barrel Safety Dump Gun fitted with high Velocity Jet and 15 degree Fan jet. 5. Sand Blasting Kit able to attach to hand gun. 6. 2" Jet Pump with 20Feet of discharge hose. 7 . Rocket Jet fitted with on High Velocity jet forward and four Fan jets rear. 8 . Jump Jet Pulsation System, if possible. 9 . One Turbo Jet - 15 Degree Rear. 10. High Pressure Floor Cleaner. 11. Cleaning pipe extensions for lift stations assorted lengths. 12 . 4000 PSI mini water jet root cutter, 4" saw blade with skids. 13 . Shall have an air compressor 12 CFM to run off truck engine and 30 gallon air tank minimum 125 lbs minimum pressure, used to blow sand etc. from man holes. Quick coupler at rear of truck. Pressure gauge on control panel. Tank shall have relief valve, all OSHA approved. It is understood that bids may not be withdrawn for a period of thirty (30) days after the date and time set for the opening of the bids. It is understood that the City Council reserves the right to retain the certified check or bid bond of the three (3) lowest bidders as determined by the City Council for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days after the date set for the opening of the bids. In submitting this bid, it is understood that the City Council reserves the right to reject any and all bids; to waive irregularities and informalities therein, and to award the contract in the best interest of the City. 10. BID PROPOSAL ONE (1) NEW 1993 MODEL TRUCK COMPLETE WITH ONE NEW HIGH PRESSURE SEWER CLEANER - TRUCK MOUNTED TO: City of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee, MN 55379 The undersigned hereby agrees to furnish the equipment listed below in accordance with the specifications on file in the office of the Public Works Director. BASE BID One New 1993 Model Truck $ New High Pressure Sewer Cleaner $ TOTAL BASE BID AMOUNT $ OPTIONS 1. $ 6. $ 11. $ 2 . $ 7 . $ 12 . $ 3 . $ 8. $ 13 . $ 4. $ 9. $ 5. $ 10. $ NOTE: Any deviations from the specifications of the equipment bid shall be listed here. Failure to do so may be reason for rejection of the bid. Manufacturer and Model Number: This machine will be delivered on or before: Guarantee: This machine will be equipped and ready for service when delivered, subject to inspection and acceptance by the Public Works Director, Street Foreman and City Mechanic. Complete parts and service facilities for the above machine are available at: Bid and performance security in the amount of 5% of the Base Bid accompanies this proposal, the same being subject to forfeiture in the event the equipment is not furnished by the date specified, if the undersigned is designated by the City Council as the lowest responsible bidder and a purchase order is executed by the Public Works Director. 11. Respectfully submitted, Printed Name of Bidder: Signature of Bidder: Address of Bidder: Telephone Number: State whether bidder is: Individual: Firm: Partnership: By: Names of Partners: Titles: Address: Corporation: Telephone Number: State in which incorporated: 12 . CQ '\1SENT / 3 TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Hiring Of Accountant/Research Analyst DATE: February 26, 1993 Introduction Council authorization to fill the position of Accountant/Research Analyst is requested. Background The 1993 budget contains appropriations for the position of Accountant/Research Analyst. Council previously authorized advertising for applications for the position. Scott County Personnel Department received about 150 applications for the position and ranked the applications in order to forward to City staff the top applicants. City staff received 13 applications ranked at the top score. Two of the applicants withdrew before interviews due to the starting pay rate. Staff interviewed the four applicants with Minnesota municipal accounting experience. Job offers were made to two of those four applicants who declined the offer. Staff then interviewed the remaining applicants of the original 13. Staff recommends that Council appoint Vernice Takumi to the position of Accountant/Research Analyst effective March 8, 1993 at a salary of $29,794 in an exempt position. Attached is a resolution amending the 1993 pay plan to include this position at a rate that is 3% higher than the amount discussed in 1992 when the position was authorized. This is consistent with Council action for the adopted 1993 pay plan. Alternatives 1. Hire as per above. 2. Do not fill position. 3. Expand the interview process. Recommendation Alternative number 1. Action requested 1. Offer Resolution No. 3756 A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 3736 Adopting The 1993 Pay Plan and move its adoption. 2. Move to appoint Vernice Takumi to the position of Accountant/Research Analyst at a starting salary of $29,794 effective March 8, 1993. RESOLUTION NO. 3756 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 3736, ADOPTING THE 1993 PAY SCHEDULE FOR THE OFFICERS AND NON UNION EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE WHEREAS, on January 19 , 1993 , the Shakopee City Council adopted Resolution No. 3736 approving the 1993 Pay Schedule for the Officers and Non Union Employees of the City of Shakopee; and WHEREAS, certain conditions and circumstances have changed to make it desirous to amend the 1993 Pay Schedule for the Officers and Non Union Employees of the City of Shakopee at this time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, that the Accountant/Research Analyst position classification is hereby added to the Pay Schedule for the Officers and Non Union Employees of the City of Shakopee at the following pay steps: Step I Step II Step III Step IV Step V Step VI 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% $29 , 794 $31, 780 $33 , 766 $35, 753 $37 , 739 $39 , 725 Adopted in session of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1993 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney 13 1-\ MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: 1993 Set Up Licenses DATE: February 22, 1993 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND: The Shakopee Ballroom and Banquet Center and the Fraternal Order of Eagles wish to renew their consumption and display license (Set Up License) for 1993 . The State Liquor Control Commission will be forwarding applications to these businesses very shortly. Upon their completion by the applicant, they will be sent to the City for execution by City officials. After execution by City officials, the applications will be returned to the Liquor Control Commission for their approval. Since the Liquor Control Commission is mailing the applications very late this year, staff recommends approval of the applications prior to their submittal to the City of Shakopee. These two applicants have received Set Up Licenses for a number of years. The applications are short and simple, and no liquor liability insurance is required. Staff recommends that Council approve the applications at their regular meeting on March 2 , 1993 . RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the applications and grant a Consumption and Display (Set Up) License to the Shakopee Ballroom and Banquet Center, 2400 East 4th Avenue; and the Fraternal Order of Eagles, 220 West 2nd Avenue. JSC/tiv TAMI\JUDY\SETUP X34 MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Karen Marty, City Attorney DATE : February 25, 1993 RE: Provision of Legal Service BACKGROUND: As you know, I am unable to keep up with the city' s civil legal work due to the huge volume of civil and criminal work. I have cut every corner and instituted every efficiency I can, but there is simply more work than one person can do. A prosecutor should, basically, fulfill three functions : (1) handle all criminal matters in court; (2) provide formal and informal training for police officers; and (3) keep up on developments in criminal law. I am managing (1) and (3) , because (1) is urgent, and I can do (3) during the waiting time at court . (2) has been almost entirely dropped. I estimated a few months ago that this job needs a 3/4-time prosecutor. The figures from Scott Joint Prosecution show that this estimate was correct : I handle slightly more than half as many cases as their one and one-half attorneys (475 to their 919) . The latest monthly chart of criminal cases is attached for your information. A civil attorney should, basically, fulfill three similar functions : (1) handle all civil cases and crises; (2) assist in preventing lawsuits and preparing ordinances; and (3) keep up on developments in civil law. I can handle crises, do preventive measures and ordinances that can be handled very quickly, and manage (3) (done during waiting time at court) . Civil cases are being contracted out, and preventive measures and ordinances that take more than five minutes are being postponed, sometimes indefinitely. On January 8 , 1993 , the City Council reviewed a memo explaining various options for the provision of legal service . At that Council meeting, we discussed hiring outside prosecutorial help or hiring in-house prosecutorial help. Council asked for additional information regarding the possible options and specific costs, which is set forth below. HIRE OUTSIDE PROSECUTORIAL HELP: We could contract for assistance in handling our gross misdemeanors only, or for assistance in handling all our criminal cases . The advantages to contracting out are as follows : we would not have to train or supervise an employee, and it would get the City Attorney fully out of the prosecution business . Disadvantages are as follows : We would have very limited control over the budget, conflicts of interest could arise, we would have limited control over which prosecutor was assigned to our cases, we would have limited control over the prosecutor' s action, we might experience lower accessibility to police officers, and although we could save perhaps $12, 000 from our current budget, we would have to pay far more than that to the prosecuting agency. 1 . Gross misdemeanors only. a. Scott County handled our gross misdemeanors until December 31, 1991 . I have spoken to James Terwedo, the County Attorney, to see if he would be willing to take these cases back. He indicated that the county ,does not wish to do these cases, because it would require additional staff, and they do not have space for staff . If the space problem somehow could be addressed, then he estimated they would charge us $30, 000 . b. Scott Joint Prosecution has previously offered to do our gross misdemeanors, only, for a cost of $22 , 200 . They were careful to indicate that this price was only an estimate, and that we would be billed for the actual cost they incurred, which would probably be higher. 2 . All criminal matters. a. Scott Joint Prosecution has indicated that they would be willing to handle all our cases, at a cost of $72, 477 . This is based on assigning us 34% of their total budget . If our number of cases was less or greater than 34% of the total cases they handled, our bill would vary accordingly. A copy of their letter is available upon request . b. Various law firms prosecute for other cities . In 1990 we spent $40, 000 on prosecutions. Since then, the prosecution case load has doubled, which would undoubtedly raise the cost . HIRE IN-HOUSE PROSECUTORIAL HELP. We could hire a full- or part-time attorney to handle prosecutions. The advantages of hiring in-house are as follows : we would have control over the prosecutor' s actions, we would have back-up for the civil attorney when needed, we would have control over the cost of prosecution, we would have no conflicts of interest, and the same person would prosecute each case for the city. Disadvantages are as follows : we would have to train and supervise an employee, and we would have to provide office space, furniture, and supplies. In 1992 , prosecutions took approximately half of my time. If we hire a half-time attorney, this person would cost approximately $15, 000 . In the previous memo I set forth the -2- estimated cost for a full-time prosecutor. In further reviewing the matter, I think we could start with a half-time attorney and increase the time later if prosecution again began to impair my ability to get the civil work done. Information regarding what other cities of this size spend and how they handle their legal matters is attached for your information. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend hiring an in-house prosecutor for the reasons stated above. REOUESTED ACTION: Discuss the alternatives and decide what method of handling work would be best for Shakopee. Signed Karen Marty, City Attorney KEM:bj m [2 5MEMO] Attachments -3- j � a % CD Cl) LU U 0 Lci)J a > 0 // // / . Z z - < 7H0 ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////i 0 121C a. Q cn w - LLI 1- CU EL2 //////////////////////�//////////////////////.- Q as _1 D _ I- Z }' o C Z 2 Cr 2 i >_ D %/////////////////////////////_ a a cr < v „ .11IL 7 illaillIMI O �����/���/ /i z H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cr) 00 f- (D to CO N r S9ONVHVJddd JO 1:1991/1f1N COMPARISON WITH OTHER CITIES Shakopee Prosecution handled in house. New criminal cases in 1992 : 473 Cases per 1000 population: 40 .43 1993 legal budget : Total : $121, 820 + $10, 000 for new half-time secretary Civil : $ 63 , 595 Prosecution: $58, 225 + 10, 000 for new secretary Savage Prosecution handled by Scott Joint Prosecution. New criminal cases in 1992 : 374 Cases per 1000 population: 29 . 92 1993 legal budget : Total : $127, 500 Civil : $ 60, 000 Prosecution: $67, 500 Prior Lake Prosecution handled by Scott Joint Prosecution. New criminal cases in 1992 : 430 Cases per 1000 population: 33 . 86 1993 legal budget : Total : $145, 300 Civil : $ 79, 300 Prosecution: $66 , 000 Chaska Prosecution handled by Carver County. New criminal cases in 1992 : unknown Cases per 1000 population: unknown 1993 legal budget : Total : $121, 686 Civil : $121, 686 + $56, 000 charged to developers Prosecution: $0 Eden Prairie Prosecution handled by law firm. New criminal cases in 1992 : @ 714 ; exact figures unavailable. Cases per 1000 population: estimated at 18 . 17 1993 legal budget : Total : $228, 000 Civil : $163, 000 Prosecution: $125, 000 [18PROS] -4- P _ 4� 1 FEB— 1 Q—•? -THS i i s_. = 1 S 0 City of ."0 6000 6000 McColl Drive • (County Road 16) • 5avaFAMinnesota 90 3815 """'`Oen Ir.tift Telephone (612) 890-1045 February 3, 1993 ;r. Dennis Kraft ;',I , "''- :ity Administrator :ity of Shakopee _29 East 1st Avenue ;hakopee, Minn. 55379 )ear Dennis : ?at Ciliberto and the Scott JointPt Association becomeB a ard of memberi of tthe lave discussed the potential havingShakopee ..ssociation. rirst, let me say that we are pleased that this is a potential - we think :hat both Shakopee and the SJPA could benefit from this, was Shakopee to Become a member. Through Pat Cil bourrtto/system.efforts , vwi.ng Shakopebelieve e that board" wade improved efficiencies in theud would further increase our legitimacy in the eyes of the judges . .gats : Understandably, a major concern of Shakopee is the cost. That is the reason that all five of the cities banded together initially. Savings will vary, depending upon what cities were paying before. However, as an example, Savage' s costs forprosecution ihin 1992 ere $50 , 152 through the SJPA. Given the "growth" beteewritten, estimate for the same period, wererosecution costs uld have been we continuing betwweenn $80,000 andd $85 ,000 to have it done by a private firm. If Shakopee is to come in to the SJPA, it should expect to pay a proportionate share of the costs of operating the Given the .infvrmationtthaC based on the number of cases op_ e you provided me, I have estimated the percentage for 1993 as follows : Number of Percentage aces ned of Total Cites �r_ ( 1992) 475 34 . 07% Shakopee 430 30 . 85% Prior Lake 374 26 . 83 Savage Belle Plaine 100 7 . 17%9 . 65% Elko 6 _ 43$ New Market 1,394 100 . 00 FEB— —•Ea= TF{I_I 1 F. : 1 E. P - 1712 r. Dennis Draft -2- February 3 , 1993 ity of Shakopee Attached is a copy of the adopted budget for 1993 , given the current level of ooeration. As shown, that is $159 , 172 . If Shakopee joins , the Association would need to expand the office . The additional salary, fringe benefits , and supplies would, by our best estimate, come to $53, 558 , for a total budget of $212,730 . (We feel that this amount is adequate for budgeting purposes; it is our hope that it would be less than that. However, for discussion purposes now, we use that amount. ) Therefore, assuming Shakopee ' s proportionate share, your costs for 1993 (pro-rated by the number of cases actually prosecuted for a partial year) would be $72 , 477 . here are likely lesser cost options available for Shakopee, if the SJPA mount is seen as too much. However, please keep in mind the need for dequate support staff, as well as attorney costs . We have budgeted to rovide the level of prosecution which was been well received by the various elice departments . Also, while there is still much work to do on fine avenues ; things are improving. You should check Shakopee's recent fine avenues to get the best historical perspective . . consistent level of prosecution has also reduced police overtime, as .efense attorneys are more willing to plea-bargain in good faith if they know .hat the cities are prepared for vigorous prosecution. -lease advise if there are any questions . Sincerely, 14'LQ 'W . CJ„ger Hark McNeill City Administrator Art/rj1 'MATT-D.LTA 4t tee tun*flt 1 # Iia J MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Karen Marty, City Attornel DATE: February 26, 1993 RE: Proposals to Revise the Zoning Ordinance BACKGROUND: Last autumn we included $6000 in my budget as an estimate to prepare a revised zoning ordinance for the City of Shakopee . In late December we received permission to solicit proposals to handle this work, and the two metro area law firms with the greatest experience in this field were contacted. We have now received their proposals to revise the zoning ordinance. Both attorneys proposing to do the work also are planners, with experience in drafting and revising zoning ordinances . Both have made very attractive proposals, and it will be difficult to choose between them. I am forwarding this to the City Council now, so that they may review the proposals at length. I will have a recommendation prepared for the meeting Tuesday night . ALTERNATIVES : 1 . Accept the proposal submitted by Ron Batty of Holmes & Graven, Chartered. 2 . Accept the proposal submitted by Tim Keane of Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 3 . Table in order to request additional information from one or both attorneys . 4 . Reject both proposals. RECOMMENDATION: A recommendation will be prepared for the meeting Tuesday night . [26CCL] PROPOSAL FOR ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE CITY OF SHAKOPEE Contact Person: Ronald H. Batty February 26, 1993 INDEX A. ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE 1 — B. RESPONSIBLE ATTORNEY 1 C. FIRM BACKGROUND 1 1. Brief History 13 2. Areas of Specialization 5 3. Firm Organization — 4. Client References 5 6 5. Background of Attorneys ATTACHMENT RESUME OF RON BATTY A. ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE Holmes & Graven proposes to contract with the City to draft an update to the Shakopee zoning ordinance. We will serve as the principal author of the text of the ordinance but will work with the city attorney, staff, planning commission and city council to achieve an ordinance suitable for the City's needs. We envision the task as requiring the following: 1. review and evaluation of the current ordinance; 2. consultation with staff, city attorney, planning commission and city council regarding objectives for the new ordinance; 3. draft ordinance; 4. attend planning commission and/or city council meetings; and 5. produce final version of the ordinance. We are available to begin work on the project immediately upon authorization by the city council. Timing for completion will be dependent upon the period of city review. We propose to perform the work at a rate of $100 per hour but not to exceed $6,000, plus disbursements. If the scope of the project is significantly greater than described above, we would seek to reach an accommodation with the City regarding an adjustment of the fee structure. The City will be billed monthly. B. RESPONSIBLE ATTORNEY We propose that Ron Batty be responsible for working with the City regarding this project. Mr. Batty is the city attorney in Medina and Lauderdale. He also serves as legal council to the Richfield and Chanhassen HRAs and to the EDAs in Robbinsdale and Lino Lakes. Mr. Batty's practice involves almost exclusively general municipal representation and development, redevelopment and tax increment financing law. Prior to practicing law, Mr. Batty served as zoning administrator for the City _ of Minnetonka for four years. In that capacity, he interpreted and enforced that City's zoning ordinance. Mr. Batty has a master's degree in urban planning and has also worked as a city planner in Queens, New York. Between 1984 and 1986, Mr. Batty served as legal counsel to the committee redrafting the Minnetonka zoning ordinance. Since then he has drafted countless zoning ordinances and amendments in many of the cities represented — by Holmes & Graven, including Richfield, Robbinsdale, Medina, Lauderdale, New Brighton and Brooklyn Center. He is currently drafting a comprehensive amendment to the Loretto zoning ordinance. As a lawyer, Mr. Batty undersands the statutory and case law framework in which Minnesota cities must operate in regulating land uses. As a former city RH849379 1 FIRM-11 planner, Mr. Batty also appreciates the practical issues facing cities experiencing significant growth. C. FIRM BACKGROUND 1. Brief History _ Holmes & Graven, Chartered was formed in 1973 as a professional legal corporation. On November 1, 1989 the municipal law and public finance departments of LeFevere, Lefler, Kennedy, O'Brien & Drawz merged into the firm bringing with them over 50 years of experience in the area of municipal law. The firm specializes in municipal law, public finance, litigation, condemnation, securities, and legislative lobbying. Holmes & Graven's experienced staff of attorneys and other professionals takes pride in the firm's broad understanding of the legal, economic, and political environment facing the public sector in Minnesota. From its very beginning, the firm has been extensively involved in the representation of public sector clients. The firm represents the following governmental units as general counsel: City of Brooklyn Center City of Crystal City of Lauderdale _ City of Loretto City of Medina • City of Mounds View City of New Brighton City of Richfield City of Robbinsdale Lake Minnetonka Conservation District White Bear Lake Conservation District Local Government Information Service (LOGIS) Hennepin Recycling Group (HRG) Suburban Rate Authority (SRA) Minneapolis Public Housing Authority We also serve as general counsel to numerous Economic Development Authorities and Housing and Redevelopment Authorities, including those in the following jurisdictions: _ Brainerd Brooklyn Center Chanhassen Columbia Heights Crystal Dakota County Lake City Lino Lakes Northwest Multi-County Richfield _ Robbinsdale Saint Cloud Scott County RBB49379 2 FIRM-11 Stearns County Washington County We also serve as special counsel on an on-going basis to approximately 30 — governmental entities, including the cities of Bloomington, Burnsville, Duluth, and Minneapolis. — 2. Areas of Specialization a. Land Use Litigation — Attorneys at Holmes & Graven have litigated numerous cases involving land use decisions of municipalities including challenges to zoning, conditional use permits, and variances. A number of attorneys in the firm including Jim Thomson, John Dean, Charlie LeFevere and Corrine Heine have handled land use litigation cases at the trial and appellate court levels involving — issues such as land dedications, platting, access rights, regulation of group homes, and height restrictions. b. Zoning Laws, Planning As part of its general municipal representation, our firm is involved on a regular basis with the drafting, interpretation and — application of zoning regulations. Attorneys with the firm have drafted literally thousands of zoning ordinance amendments pertaining to such things as shoreland regulations, development moratoriums and regulation of group homes. We have codified the — zoning ordinances for numerous municipalities. Ron Batty has had extensive experience with zoning matters both as an attorney and as a planner. A substantial portion of Mr. Batty's municipal — work relates to zoning and land use matters. — c. Platting, Land Development An essential element of municipal legal representation is advising clients concerning a host of platting, land use, comprehensive plan and subdivision issues which cities face on a daily basis. Attorneys in our firm have extensive and long-term experience in such matters. Jim Thomson is a frequent lecturer on land use — issues and has handled many significant land use cases at the trial and appellate levels. Two of our attorneys, Ron Batty and Steve Bubul, hold masters degrees in urban planning. Mr. Batty _ has worked as a city planner for the City of New York, Borough of Queens and was the zoning administrator for the City of Minnetonka from 1980 to 1984. Steve Bubul worked as a land use planner from 1978 to 1984 for the Dane County (Wisconsin) — Regional Planning Commission. RHB49379 3 FIRM-11 d. Chapter 429 Projects As city attorneys we assist the city staff throughout the special assessment process to ensure compliance with statutory — procedures. We consult with staff in the preparation of assessment rolls, acquiring property when needed and the handling of assessment appeals. Charlie LeFevere has been a — frequent lecturer at continuing legal education courses on this subject, has extensive experience in reviewing improvement proceedings in cities throughout Minnesota, and has represented a number of cities in special assessment appeals. Our bond — approving attorneys are intimately familiar with the special assessment process. — e. General Municipal Finance As a nationally recognized bond counsel, Holmes & Graven has acted as bond counsel throughout the United States and for over 200 public entities in Minnesota. The firm is a member of The National Association of Bond Lawyers and is listed in the Municipal Bond Attorneys of the United States section of "The — Bond Buyer's Directory." Holmes & Graven has a broad base of experience in connection with the issuance and sale of public debt, at the local, regional and state levels. We have acted as — bond counsel, underwriter's counsel, company counsel and issuer's counsel in issues of general obligation bonds, tax increment bonds, industrial development bonds and single family and multifamily housing bonds. The firm played a central role in the drafting of Minnesota's tax increment financing, industrial development bond and housing bond laws. — f. Economic Development/Redevelopment Holmes & Graven developed much of its housing and — redevelopment law experience by acting as general counsel to the Minneapolis Housing and Redevelopment Authority from April, 1973 to June, 1981. When that agency was reorganized in 1981, the Minneapolis city attorney undertook the general counsel — responsibilities, and we concentrated on condemnation, bond issues, and redevelopment contract negotiations. While general counsel, Holmes & Graven rendered approximately 500 formal — legal written opinions regarding all aspects of the operation of a housing and redevelopment authority, all of which have been retained and cataloged; handled approximately 350 condemnation proceedings through commissioner hearings, district court trial and supreme court appeal; handled real estate title matters, including quiet title and torrens proceedings; negotiated all development agreements, including tax increment, UDAG, EDA, SBA and CDBG-funded projects; initiated the locally-funded commercial and housing rehabilitation program, the urban homestead program, the single family and multifamily loan — programs, as well as initial implementation of the CDBG, UDAG, Section 23 and Section 8 programs; and handled federal and state lobbying activities. RRB49379 4 FIRM-11 The firm's expertise in housing and redevelopment matters has — resulted in our current role as general counsel to the Housing and Redevelopment Authorities and Economic Development Authorities listed earlier in this proposal. We also represent the — Minnesota Chapter of The National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials. Jim Holmes prepared the prototype EDA legislation for the City of Red Wing, and our work as bond counsel brings us into continuous contact with EDAs throughout the state. In many cases Holmes & Graven is retained to provide specialized housing, economic development or redevelopment services to cities. We act in this capacity for over 50 cities in Minnesota. While these services are varied, they typically involve the — structuring and negotiating of specific transactions. Holmes & Graven has negotiated literally hundreds of development contracts on behalf of public clients. We drafted the early tax increment agreements, the form of which is in common use today. We drafted the first UDAG contract in connection with the Minneapolis Pillsbury research and development facility and that form is still in use nationally by HUD. g. Ordinance Codification We have codified the city codes for the Cities of Crystal, Inver Grove Heights, West St. Paul, Brainerd, Maple Grove, Plymouth, Richfield, Hopkins, Independence, Richmond, LMCD, Robbinsdale, South St. Paul, and Melrose. h. Charter Commissions We presently serve as attorneys to the Charter Commissions in Crystal, Brooklyn Center, Plymouth, St. Cloud, Moorhead, Mounds View and Lino Lakes. 3. Firm Organization Holmes & Graven has 23 lawyers and five paralegals. Two of the paralegals are primarily involved in litigation activities and one each is involved primarily in real estate, municipal, and public finance. Our firm's support staff totals 23 persons, 22 of whom are involved in either administrative, accounting, or secretarial work. We also have three law clerks. _ Holmes & Graven is a professional corporation. James S. Holmes, John R. Larson, and David J. Kennedy are the principals of the firm. The principals are permanent members of the firm's Executive Committee which also consists of two other members from the firm's board of directors. The director of administration is responsible for the implementation of the directives from the executive committee and board of directors and for overseeing the personnel issues relating to the professional and nonprofessional staff. Secretaries are — assigned to designated attorneys. Law clerks and paralegals are available to all attorneys on an as-needed basis. RRB49379 5 FIRM-11 & Graven, The address of the firm is: Hol eslsbury Chartered 470Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 The firm's telephone number for the switchboard is (612) 337-9300. In addition, each attorney has a direct dial number. Our fax number is 337- 9310. In the event that line is busy, the call will automatically roll over to our second fax machine. 4. Client References The firm has represented hundreds of Minnesota cities in various capacities, including general counsel, special counsel and bond counsel. A complete listing of those cities will be provided upon request. The following is a list -- of all cities for which neral counselregularly act as special counsellus a ve list of governmental agencies for whom we _ Robert Alfton, City Attorney Floyd Olson, Chief Deputy City Attorney City of Minneapolis A-1700 Government Center Minneapolis, MN 55487 (612) 673-2021 Mark Bernhardson, City Manager Lyle Olson, Director of Staff Services City of Bloomington 2215 West Old Shakopee Road -" Bloomington, MN 54331 (612) 881-5811 David Childs, City Manager City of New Brighton 803 - 5th Ave. , N.W. _ New Brighton, MN 55112 (612) 633-1533 Nick Dragisich, City Administrator City of Virginia 327 South 1st Street Virginia, MN 55792 (218) 741-3890 Jerry Dulgar, City Manager _ City of Crystal 4141 Douglas Drive North Crystal, MN 55422 (612) 537-8421 REU349379 6 FIRM-11 Francis Hagen, City Manager City of Robbinsdale 4221 Lake Road Robbinsdale, MN 55422 — (612) 537-4534 Jay Jensen, Executive Director — Minneapolis Community Development Agency 200 Crown Roller Mill 105 5th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55401 — (612) 673-5125 Gregory Konat, City Manager — City of Burnsville 100 Civic Center Parkway Burnsville, MN 55337 (612) 895-4400 James Miller, former City Manager City of Minnetonka — 14600 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, MN 55345 (612) 939-8200 Kathleen Miller, City Administrator City of Lauderdale 1891 Walnut Street (612 631-0300 Samantha Orduno, City Administrator -- City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 James Prosser, City Manager City of Richfield 6700 Portland Ave. , S. — Richfield, MN 55423 (612) 968-7521 Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator City of Ramsey 15153 Nowthen Boulevard N.W. Ramsey, MN 55303 — (612) 427-1410 Hank Sinda, City Manager — (Former City Manager, City of New Brighton) City of Sioux City, Iowa (712) 279-6102 RRB49379 FIRM-11 7 Jerry Splinter, City Manager — City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 — (612) 561-5440 Anne Theis, Mayor City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 (612) 473-4643 Tom Van Beusekom, Mayor City of Loretto — 259 North Medina Street Loretto, MN 55357 (612) 479-4305 Dan Vogt, City Administator City of Brainerd 501 Laurel Street — Brainerd, MN 56401 James Willis, City Administrator — City of Inver Grove Heights 8150 Barbara Avenue Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 -' 5. Background of Attorneys The following is a brief background summary of each attorney in the firm: — Robert A. Alsop, born New Ulm, Minnesota, May 9, 1959; admitted to bar, 1986, Minnesota; 1986, U.S. District Court of Minnesota. Education: St. Olaf — College (B.A. , 1981) ; William Mitchell College of Law (J.D. , 1986) . Member: Minnesota State and American Bar Associations. Practice: Real estate, litigation. Ronald H. Batty, born Tampa, Florida, September 20, 1951; admitted to bar, — 1980, Minnesota. Education: Loyola University (B.A. , magna cum laude, 1973); Hunter College of the City of New York (M.U.P. , 1975) ; Georgetown University Law Center (J.D. , 1979) . City Attorney: Medina, 1987--, Lauderdale, 1986--, — Robbinsdale Economic Development Authority, 1990--. Member: Hennepin County and Minnesota State Bar Associations. Practice: Public finance, local government. _ Stephen J. Bubul, born Indianapolis, Indiana, November 5, 1952; admitted to bar, 1987, Wisconsin and U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin; 1988, Minnesota. Education: University of Wisconsin (B.A. , 1975; M.S. , 1978; J.D. , cum laude, 1986) . Phi Beta Kappa. Instructor, Legal Writing, University of Wisconsin — Law School, 1985. Law Clerk, Justice Peter S. Popovich, Minnesota Supreme Court. Member: State Bar of Wisconsin; Minnesota State Bar Association. Practice: Local government, public finance. 88849379 FIRM-11 8 Robert C. Carlson, born St. Paul, Minnesota, March 27, 1943; admitted to bar 1973, Minnesota, Iowa; 1973, U.S. District Court of Minnesota and U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit; 1985, U.S. Supreme Court. Education: University of Minnesota (B.S. 1966); University of Iowa (J.D. with honors 1973) . Member: Hennepin County, Minnesota State and American Bar Associations. Practice: Corporate, securities. Robert L. Davidson, born Mohall, North Dakota, August 29, 1933; admitted to bar, 1957, Minnesota. Education: University of Minnesota (B.S.L. , 1955; LL.B. , 1957) . Phi Delta Phi. Member: Hennepin County, Minnesota State and American Bar Associations. Practice: Real Estate. John B. Dean, born New Britain, Connecticut, April 14, 1944; admitted to bar, 1969, Minnesota. Education: Grinnell College and University of Kansas (B.A. , -- 1966) ; University of Minnesota (J.D. , 1969) . Criminal Director, University of Minnesota Legal Aid Clinic, 1968-1969. Assistant State Public Defender 1969-1970. Assistant Hennepin County Public Defender for Misdemeanors, 1969-1970. City Attorney: Richfield, 198--; Robbinsdale, 1988--. Member: Hennepin County and Minnesota State Bar Associations. Practice: Local government, trial and administrative, housing and redevelopment. -' Mary G. Dobbins, born Minneapolis, Minnesota, May 5, 1954; admitted to bar, 1983, Minnesota; 1983 U.S. District Court of Minnesota. Education: University of Minnesota (B.A. 1979, magna cum laude); William Mitchell College of Law (J.D. 1983, cum laude). Phi Beta Kappa. Member: Minnesota State and American Bar Associations. Practice: Real estate, litigation. Stefanie N. Galey, born New York, New York, October 28, 1953; admitted to bar, 1980, Minnesota; 1981, U.S. District Court of Minnesota. Education: Cornell University (B.A. 1975); William Mitchell College of Law (J.(J.D. , cum laude, 1980) . Member: Hennepin County, Minnesota State and American Bar Associations; National Association of Bond Lawyers. Practice: Public finance, taxation, securities. Corrine A. Heine, born Waterloo, Iowa, June 10, 1957; admitted to bar, 1983, Minnesota. Education: Wartburg College (B.A. , summa cum laude, 1979) ; University of Minnesota (J.D. , magna cum laude, 1983) . City Attorney, Loretto, 1987--. Attorney for White Bear Lake Conservation District, 1987--. Town attorney for Town of Eureka, 1989--. Member: Hennepin County, Minnesota State and American Bar Associations. Practice: Local government, eminent domain, appellate practice. — James S. Holmes, born Fargo, North Dakota, March 9, 1941; admitted to bar, 1969, Minnesota. Education: Washburn University of Topeka (B.A. , magna cum laude, 1966); University of Minnesota (J.D. , cum laude, 1969) . Order of the Coif. _ McVicar Scholar. Article Editor, University of Minnesota Law Review, 1968-1969. Co-author with David Graven: "Of Open Meetings," "Attorney-Client Privileges," and "The Government Lawyer," 33 Bench and Bar 8, February, 1977. Author: "The Attorney-Client Privilege Exception to the Open Meeting Law," 62 Minnesota Cities 13, December, 1977. Author: "Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act, annotated," 1979, 1980, 1982. Instructor, Legal Writing, 1969-1971, Appellate Advocacy, 1971- 1973, University of Minnesota Law School. Adjunct Professor, Municipal Bonds, _.. 1982, University of Minnesota Law School. Chairman Metropolitan Council Housing Advisory Committee, 1971-1973. Member, Metropolitan Council Redevelopment Authority Advisory Committee, 1973-1974. Member, Minnesota Chapter of the RHB49379 FIRM-11 9 _ National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials, 1979-. Member, National Association of Bond Lawyers (Member, Tax Increment/Special Assessment District Financing Committee and Financing Housing, 1978-) . Member: Hennepin County (Member, Local Government Law Committee, 1978-) , Minnesota State and American (Member, Local Government Law Section) Bar Associations. Practice: General representation, real estate, finance. David J. Kennedy, born Minneapolis, Minnesota, January 29, 1932; admitted to bar, 1961, Minnesota. Education: University of Notre Dame (B.A. , 1953) ; University of Minnesota (LL.B. , 1960) . Phi Delta Phi. Staff Attorney, League of Minnesota Municipalities, 1960-1967. Member, Bloomington Charter Commission, 1972-1976. Director, Minnesota Office of Urban and Local Affairs, 1967-1969. Assistant Senate Counsel, Minnesota State Senate, 1969-1972. Attorney, City of Crystal, 1973--. Municipal Bond Approving Counsel, 1973--. Member: Hennepin County and Minnesota State Bar Associations; National Association of Bond Lawyers. Cmdr. , USNR - Retired. Practice: Public finance, legislation, local government. _ John R. Larson, born Montevideo, Minnesota, January 24, 1947; admitted to bar, 1974, Minnesota. Education: University of Minnesota and Mankato State College (B.A. , 1970); William Mitchell College of Law (J.D. , 1974). Chairman of Committee for a Law Review; Committee on Professional Responsibility; Securities Examiner, Securities Division, Minnesota Department of Commerce, 1972-1974; Real Estate Director, Securities Division, Minnesota Department of Commerce, 1974-1975; Minnesota Commissioner of Securities, 1975-1978 (with responsibilities for the administration of Minnesota securities, real estate, franchise, subdivided land, charities and corporate takeover laws); Chairman, Commerce Commission, 1978 (with oversight responsibilities of securities, banks and insurance divisions of the Department of Commerce) ; Member: William Mitchell College of Law Association; Real Estate, Securities and Syndication Institute; National Syndication Forum; Former member of National Association of Securities, Dealers, Inc. ; Real Estate Committee; Former member Commodity Futures Trading Commission; Advisory Committee on State Jurisdiction. Continuing Legal Education Speaker. Member: Hennepin County, Minnesota State and American Bar Associations. Practice: General business, securities, real estate. Wellington H. Law, born St. Paul, Minnesota, October 30, 1931; admitted to bar, 1955, Minnesota; 1957, U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota.; 1963, U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Court of Military Appeals; 1970, U.S. Claims Court. -" Education: University of Minnesota (B.S.L. , 1955, LL.B. , 1955) . Phi Delta Phi. Member, Board of Editors. University of Minnesota Law Review, 1953-1954. Member: Hennepin County, Minnesota State and American (Member, Forum Committee on Construction Industry, 1979--; Sections on: Public Contract Law; International Law) Bar Associations. Practice: Litigation and construction law. _ Charles L. LeFevere, born Minneapolis, Minnesota, December 21, 1947; admitted to bar, 1975, Minnesota. Education: St. Olaf College (B.A. 1968) ; University of Minnesota (J.D. cum laude, 1975) . City Attorney: New Brighton, 1982- -, Brooklyn Center, 1987--, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, 1978--, Municipal Bond Approving Counsel, 1980--. Member: Hennepin County, Minnesota State and American Bar Associations. Practice: Public finance, local government. RHSd9379 FIRM-11 10 John M. LeFevre, Jr., born Dayton, Ohio, September 15, 1944; admitted to bar, 1970, New York; 1973, U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y. , 1977, Minnesota; 1978, U.S. District Court, D. Minn. ; 1978, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Education: Williams College (B.A. cum laude, 1966); University of Michigan (J.D. , 1969) . Phi Beta Kappa. Member: Hennepin County and Minnesota State Bar Associations. Referee, Hennepin County Conciliation Court. iCapt. , U.S. Marine Corps Reserve, 1970-19722. Practice: Litigation, condemnation, motor carrier representation, environmental law. Robert J. Lindall, born Slayton, Minnesota, February 28, 1944; admitted to bar, 1969, Minnesota and 1980, U.S. District Court of Minnesota. Certified by Minnesota Bar Association as Specialist in Real Property Law. Education: University of Minnesota (B.A. , 1966; J.D. , 1969) . Delta Theta Phi, Phi Sigma Kappa. Co-author with John M. LeFevre and Mary G. Dobbins of Minnesota Condemnation Law and Practice, 1990. Co-author with Mary Dobbins, "Minnesota's Doctrines of Public Purpose and Superior Public Purpose in Eminent Domain," Minn. Real Est. L. J. , May/June, 1983, Co-author with Douglas Peterson, "Origins of Eminent Domain," Minn. Real Est. L. J. , August, 1983. Special Assistant Attorney General, State of Minnesota (representing Pollution Control Agency), 1969-1973. Staff Attorney, 1973-1974, Vice President and General Counsel, 1974-1977, President and General Manager, 1977-1978, Jonathan Development Corporation. Member, 1971-1975 and Chairman, 1974-1975, Minnesota Environmental Education Council. Member, Metropolitan Council Transportation Advisory Board, 1978-1981. Alderman, City of Chaska, 1978-to present. Member: Hennepin, County (Chairman, Eminent Domain Committee, 1981-1983), Minnesota State (Member, Real Property Section and Eminent Domain Committee) and American (Member, Sections on: Real Property, Probate and Trust Law; Corporation, Banking and Business Law; Local Government Law; Committee on Environmental Law) Bar Associations; International Right of Way Association Candidate, Senior Member (SR/WA) . Practice: Condemnation, real estate, litigation, corporate, environmental law, tax appeals. Laura K. Mollet, born Racine, Wisconsin, August 3, 1957; admitted to bar, 1982, Minnesota. Education: University of Minnesota (B.A. , magna cum laude, 1979; J.D. , 1982) . Member: Hennepin County and American Bar Associations. Practice: Public finance, securities. Barbara L. Portwood, born Kansas City, Missouri, October 22, 1951, admitted to bar, 1979, Wisconsin and U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin; 1981, Minnesota. Education: Rutgers University (B.A. 1975); University of Wisconsin (J.D. , cum laude, 1979) . Law Clerk to the Honorable Barbara B. Crabb, Chief Judge, U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, 1979-1980. Member: Hennepin County, Minnesota State and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Wisconsin; National Association of Bond Lawyers. Practice: General governmental representation, public finance. — James M. Strommen, born Minneapolis, Minnesota, December 4, 1952; admitted to bar, 1983, Minnesota. Education: Augsburg College (B.A. , magna cum laude, 1977); University of Minnesota (J.D. , cum laude, 1983). Delta Theta Phi. Member: Hennepin County, Minnesota State and American Bar Associations. Language: German. Practice: Trials and appeals, public utilities, administrative, corporate. RR849379 FIRM-11 11 _ James J. Thomson, Jr., born Providence, Rhode Island, June 26, 1947; admitted to bar, 1976, California; 1982, Minnesota. Education: University of Notre Dame (A.B. , 1969) ; University of San Diego (J.D. , magna cum laude, 1976) . Alpha Kappa Delta. Editor-in-Chief, San Diego Law Review, 1975. Author: "Landlord — Tort Liability in California," 12 San Diego Law Review 401, 1974; "Report of the Municipal Labor Relations Committee," 40A, Municipal Law Review 13, 1977. Deputy City Attorney, San Diego City Attorney's Office, 1976-1982. City Attorney, — Plymouth, 1986-1992. Member: Hennepin County and Minnesota State Bar Associations; State Bar of California. Capt. , USMC, 1969-1973. Practice: Trials, appeals, local government. — Larry M. Wertheim, born Minneapolis, Minnesota, May 29, 1950; admitted to bar, 1976, Minnesota; 1976, U.S. District Court of Minnesota; 1978, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Education: University of California at Berkeley (A.B. , — 1971) ; University of Wisconsin (M.A. , 1973); University of Minnesota (J.D. , magna cum laude, 1976) . Phi Beta Kappa. Author: "Due-On-Sale Clauses in Minnesota," 1 MINN. REAL. EST. L. J. 33 (1982); "Due-On-Sale Clauses - An Update," 1 Minn. _ Real Est. L.J. 81, 1982; "Due-On-Sale III: The New Federal Preemption," 1 Minn. Real Est. L.J. 113, 1982; "Case Comment -American National Bank v. Blaeser," 1 Minn. Real Est. L.J. 154, 1983. Member: Hennepin County and Minnesota State Bar Associations. Practice: Litigation, general business matters. Bonnie L. Wilkins, born Fargo, North Dakota, October 22, 1944; admitted to bar 1986, Minnesota. Education: North Dakota State University (B.A. 1966), _ University of Minnesota (J.D. , cum laude, 1986) . ABA Moot Court Competition Participant, 1985. Appellate Advocacy Instructor, University of Minnesota Law School. Member: Ramsey County, Minnesota State and American Bar Associations. Practice: Real estate, corporate. Gary P. Winter, born Buffalo, New York, August 2, 1953; admitted to bar 1988, New York, Massachusetts; 1990 District of Columbia, 1991, Minnesota. — Education: Rutgers University (B.A. 1975), University of Minnesota (M.A. 1980), State University of New York at Buffalo (J.D. 1987) . Moot Court Board 1986. Author: Tax Increment Financing: A New Redevelopment Financing Mechanism for — New York Communities' 19 Fordham Urban Law Journal (1) 1992; "Tax Increment Financing: Funding Community Development with Future Tax Receipts", Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development in cooperation with the League of Minnesota Cities, 1984; "The Downtown Redevelopment Financing Dilemma", 7 — Current Municipal Problems (2) : 202-209 Fall 1980. Member: American, New York, District of Columbia, Minnesota and Hennepin County Bar Associations. Practice: Municipal, environmental, insurance, real estate development and general business — matters. 88849379 FIRM-11 12 R E S U M of Ron Batty RH849379 FIRM-11 RONALD H. BATTY Home Address Office Address 4261 Alabama Avenue South 470 Pillsbury Center St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 922-0496 (612) 337-9300 EDUCATION Juris Doctor Georgetown University Law Center Washington, D.C. May, 1979 Master of Urban Planning Bachelor of Arts Hunter College Loyola University City University of New York New Orleans, Louisiana New York, New York January, 1973 May, 1975 Major: Political Science Minor: Economics WORK EXPERIENCE Attorney Holmes & Graven, Chartered February 1984 to Present Minneapolis, Minnesota (since April, 1989) LeFevere, Lefler, Kennedy, O'Brien & Drawz, P.A. (February 1984 through April, 1989) Municipal Experience: — - Serve as city attorney for cities of Medina and Lauderdale and assistant city attorney for Richfield, Brooklyn Center and Robbinsdale. - Conduct research and write legal opinions on a variety of municipal matters. -' - Communicate with public officials, citizens and legal counsel regarding city affairs. - Appear at city council and other public meetings. Development and Public Finance Experience: - Serve as attorney for the Robbinsdale Economic Development Authority. - Extensive practice in areas of public development and redevelopment law with emphasis on tax increment financing. - Draft and negotiate development agreements for cities within metropolitan area and greater Minnesota. — - Serve as bond counsel on numerous municipal issues. RHB49379 FIRM-11 Zoning Administrator City of Minnetonka February 1980 - February 1984 Minnetonka, Minnesota - Reviewed and interpreted title evidence, covenants, plats, financial statements and litigation documents to ensure compliance with Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act. - Testified at administrative hearings and assisted in preparation of evidence for hearings. - Conducted extensive staff training for 15 HUD professionals regarding title evidence and land use provisions of Department regulations. - Edited annotation of administrative and federal cases involving Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act for Department use. ACADEMIC ACCOMPLISHMENTS Weintraub Fellowship for Social Sciences at Hunter College City University of New York Magna Cum Laude, Loyola University President, Student Committee on Academic Excellence for College of Arts and Sciences, Loyola University University Fellow, Loyola University BAR ADMISSION Minnesota, 1980 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS American Bar Association Minnesota State Bar Association Hennepin County Bar Association RHB49379 FIRM-11 CITY OF SHAKOPEE PROPOSAL FOR SERVICES FEBRUARY 1993 JAMES P.LARKIN LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY& LINDGREN, LTD.D. PAUL B.PLUNKETT ROBERT L.HOFFMAN ALAN L.KILDOW JACK F.DALY ATTORNEYS AT LAW KATHLEEN M.NEWMAN D.KENNETH UNDGREN MICHAEL B.LEBARON GERALD H.FRIEDELL GREGORY E.KORSTAD ALLAN E.MUWGAN GARY A.VAN CLEVE• JAMES C.ERICKSON DANIEL L.BOWLES EDWARD J.DRISCOLL 1500 NORWEST FINANCIAL CENTER TODD M.VLATKOVICH GENE N.FULLER TIMOTHY J.McMANUS JOHN D.FULLMER 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH TIMOTHY J.KEANE — ROBERT E.BOYLE ALAN M.ANDERSON FRANK I.HARVEY BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 DONNA L.ROBACK CHARLES S.MODELL MICHAEL W.SCHLEY CHRISTOPHER J.DIETZEN TELEPHONE(612) 835-3800 MICHAEL A.ROBERTSON JOHN R.BEATTIE USA A.GRAY UNDA H.FISHER FAX (612) 896-3333 GARY A.RENNEKE THOMAS P.STOLTMAN SHANNON K.McCAMBRIDGE MICHAEL C.JACKMAN CHRISTOPHER J.HARRISTHAL JOHN E.DIEHL WIWAM C.GRIFFITH,JR. JON S.SWIERZEWSKI JOHN J.STEFFENHAGEN THOMAS J.FLYNN DANIEL W.VOSS JAMES P.QUINN MARK A.RURIK a. TODD I.FREEMAN JOHN R.HILL PETER K.BECK JAMES K.MARTIN JEROME H.KAHNKE THOMAS J.SEYMOUR GERALD L.SECK MICHAEL J.SMITH JOHN B.LUNDQUIST FREDERICK K.HAUSER III DAYLE NOLAN CIUBERTO• MARY E.VOS THOMAS B.HUMPHREY,JR. LARRY D.MARTIN JOHN A.COTTER• JANE E.BREMER BEATRICE A.ROTHWEILER MARCY R.KREISMAN OF COUNSEL WENDELL R.ANDERSON JOSEPH GITIS RICHARD A.NORDBYE •ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN February 11, 1993 Ms . Karen Marty City Attorney City of Shakopee 129 East Holmes Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 Re: Proposal for Services - Zoning Ordinance Update Dear Karen: On behalf of Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. , I wish to express our appreciation for the opportunity to submit a proposal to provide legal services for the City of Shakopee in preparation of an update of its Zoning Ordinance. I would be the attorney assigned responsibility for execution and delivery of all aspects of this project . Peter Beck of our Land Use Department may assist if necessary and appropriate. (See resumes attached as Appendix 1. ) Based on my experience in undertaking zoning ordinance updates in other communities and with the issues before the City of Shakopee, I see a number of key challenges in this effort . o Establishing a process for the Zoning Ordinance update that provides for meaningful public participation at key check points while assuring the process moves ahead. o Business Park - Development of performance and use standards meeting the needs of a business park for the future consistent with the objectives of the City. o Commercial - Developing commercial use and performance standards responsive to the demands brought about by new transportation facilities and anticipated growth. LAR IN, HOFFMAN, DALY& LINDGREN, LTD. City of Shakopee February 11, 1993 Page 2 ° Non-conformities - Developing regulations that minimize land use incompatibilities and deal fairly with non- conforming land uses while moving towards conformity. Please find set forth below the proposal for services, including information relating to firm background, attorney qualifications, firm qualifications, fees, and potential conflicts . INTRODUCTION The following proposal for legal services is submitted by Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. (the Firm) in response to the City of Shakopee (the City) Request for Proposals relating to a comprehensive update of the City' s zoning regulations . FIRM BACKGROUND 1 . Brief history of Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. : Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. , is a full-service law firm located in Bloomington, Minnesota. The Firm is a growing, 70-attorney, first-generation law firm that was formed in 1958 . The Firm has developed a reputation as the leading suburban law firm in the Twin Cities area and the largest specialized practice group in land use regulation. The Firm represents a number of municipal and public sector clients . The Firm presently serves as city attorneys to the cities of Elk River, Shorewood, Long Lake and the Townships of Oak Grove and Louisville, as well as special counsel to several cities including St . Paul , Prior Lake, St . Cloud, Eden Prairie, Woodbury, and Bloomington. Past and present municipal and public sector clients, along with a brief description of the scope of our representation of each, are set forth on the public sector client summary attached as Appendix 2 . A summary of the scope of Firm experience in municipal matters is set forth below. a. Municipal Litigation: Approximately one-half of the Firm' s attorneys are litigation attorneys . The Firm has handled numerous lawsuits on behalf of our municipal clients . These litigation matters have included zoning enforcement and land use defense actions, Chapter 429 appeals, condemnation actions, employment matters, and environmental matters . LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY& LINDGREN, LTD. City of Shakopee February 11, 1993 Page 3 b. Zoning, Platting and Land Development : The Firm is the region' s leader in the practice of law affecting the use and development of land. The Land Use Governmental and Environmental Affairs Departments of the Firm include 17 attorneys who represent public and private sector clients in all aspects of land and water development . The Firm' s practice in this area has included the comprehensive drafting of zoning and subdivision ordinances for municipal clients, as well as the application and enforcement of those ordinances . c. Condemnation: The Firm has significant experience in condemnation matters on behalf of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, the City of Bloomington Housing and Redevelopment Authority, as well as smaller cities and school districts . d. MSA 429 Projects : The Firm has extensive experience in assisting Elk River, Shorewood, Oak Grove, and other fast-growing communities with public improvement projects, large and small . We have advised these and other municipalities with respect to many Chapter 429 projects and have defended one project which went to the Minnesota Supreme Court . e. Environmental and Superfund Laws : The Firm has over 20 years experience handling environmental review matters for public and private sector clients and presently serves as special counsel on environmental review matters to the City of St. Paul, Eden Prairie and Woodbury. The Firm also provides legal counsel in specialized matters with respect to wetlands and Superfund issues . f . Employment Law: In addition to its public and private employment law clients, the Firm serves as counsel to the Minnesota League of Cities Insurance Trust in defense claims as well as risk prevention and loss control . They also represent, as special counsel, the cities of Elk River, Richfield, Becker, Plymouth, Mankato, Owatonna, Virginia, Worthington, and others . LARHIN, HOFFMAN, DALY& LINDGREN, LTD. City of Shakopee February 11, 1993 Page 4 g. Public Finance and Tax Increment Financing: The Firm has assisted public clients in the creation of multiple tax increment financing districts, including economic development, redevelopment and housing districts . Attorneys in the Firm have also served as special counsel on tax increment financing matters to several other cities, as well as substantial experience representing private sector clients with respect to tax increment financing and related financial incentives for the development of property. 2 . Number of attorney/specialties : The Firm consists of approximately 70 attorneys and over 150 total employees . The Firm is organized into ten departments, each with its own specialty. Members of the Firm have extensive experience in local , regional and state governmental affairs, public finance, environmental, real estate, housing, redevelopment and land development law, and civil litigation. 3 . Number of paralegals/specialties : The Firm employs 13 legal assistants, each specializing and providing support to attorneys within various departments . The Firm utilizes the skills of legal assistants in all areas to achieve economies and the most efficient delivery of services possible. 4 . Support personnel : Support functions include administrative secretaries, librarians, finance, data processing, word processing, records management, a copy center, and messengers . Laser printers expedite document production and delivery. With its years of government-related law practice, the Firm has an extensive municipal and governmental law library. The Firm' s library includes on-site Lexis and Westlaw computer research capability. The Firm employs over 70 support personnel . 5 . Office organization: With respect to support capabilities, the Firm has implemented an orderly and systematic automation of both office and legal systems . These include centralized word processing, accounting, billing, data processing, internal and external information retrieval which have significantly enhanced our productivity levels for both staff and attorneys . LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY& LINDGREN, LTD. City of Shakopee February 11, 1993 Page 5 6 . Office location: Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 1500 Norwest Financial Center 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (612) 835-3800 ATTORNEY QUALIFICATIONS Municipal clients are treated by the Firm in the same manner as our larger corporate clients . They are assigned to a responsible attorney who has overall responsibility for managing the delivery of legal services to the client. Tim Keane, as special counsel to the City of Shakopee is the person to whom the City may turn at any time for any need. Sub-projects are assigned by the special counsel to the attorney within the Firm most suited to handle the matter in the highest quality, most efficient manner possible. FIRM QUALIFICATIONS 1 . References . Please feel free to contact any of the clients below for references . Brad Nielsen, Planning Director, City of Shorewood (474-6558) Pat Klaers, City Administrator, City of Elk River (441-7420) James Hurm, City Administrator, City of Shorewood (474-3236) Jan Olsen, Administrator, or Rick Kantorowicz, Town Board Chair, Township of Oak Grove (753-1920) Joel Jamnik, Counsel , League of Minnesota Cities (227-5600) 2 . Experience. In addition to the depth of municipal experience, the Firm represents property owners and developers throughout the region. Tim Keane has represented clients in over 25 different cities in the past two years . This varied accumulated experience is an invaluable resource to bring to Shakopee in the development of land use regulations that are defensible, "user friendly, " "market rate, " and are targeted to respond to LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY& LINDGREN, LTD. City of Shakopee February 11, 1993 Page 6 the multiple constituencies of the City Council, Planning Commission, Comprehensive Plan, staff, property owners and the development community. Tim has had an opportunity to deal with land use regulations and procedures that work - - and those that do not . The experience encountered with subtle variations of regulatory options are an essential asset brought to the development of the Shakopee land use regulatory framework. FEES Based upon the preliminary work program set forth in Appendix 3 , we estimate the range of fees for services to be between $7, 000 and $15 , 000 . Hourly Rates : Standard Rate Shakopee Rate Timothy J. Keane $150 $ 95 Peter K. Beck $180 $110 Legal Assistants $ 70 $ 50 We do not charge a separate hourly rate for clerical or support staff . Upon completion of the project, we will provide the City with a computer diskette of the Ordinance in any one of several formats compatible with the City' s information systems . Miscellaneous : Duplicating $ . 30/copy Westlaw $50 . 00/hour (varies) Facsimile $ 1 . 00/page Billing Statements : We will prepare monthly billing statements in the format requested by the City. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The following information is given to disclose to the City of Shakopee issues relating to potential conflicts of interest . LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY& LINDGREN, LTD. City of Shakopee February 11, 1993 Page 7 A. We know of no client matter which would conflict with our ability to serve as special counsel to the City of Shakopee. B. The Firm represents many property owners and real estate clients . To the best of our knowledge none of our clients are currently developing in Shakopee. A partial list of these clients includes : o Carlson Real Estate Companies o Hoffman Development Group o Midwest Management o Homart Development Company o C. G. Rein o Triple Five Corporation o Melvin Simon & Associates o Orrin Thompson Homes o Robert Muir Companies o Marfield-Belgarde-Yaffe o Delta Development Company C. The Firm acts as special counsel to Scott County on a wetland matter in the City of Savage. D. The Firm serves as special counsel to the City of Prior Lake in the Metropolitan Council consideration of "The Wilds" golf course/residential development . E . Conflicts of interest are identified by means of a daily new matter report which is reviewed by all attorneys . The new matter report identifies all clients and all parties adverse to a client for every file opened in the office. It has been the Firm' s policy in representing municipalities to refuse to undertake projects for developers or litigation on behalf of parties involved with a municipality the Firm represents on an ongoing basis . If another client of the Firm were to request its services in connection with some matter involving the City of Shakopee, it would be our practice to either obtain the City' s prior consent to such representation or, more likely, to request the other client of the Firm to seek counsel elsewhere for the particular matter in question. LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY& LINDGREN, LTD. City of Shakopee February 11, 1993 Page 8 I look forward with an opportunity to discuss this project with you and representatives of the City. In the interim, should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 896-3203 . Sincerely, _— Timothy J. Keane, for LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd. kw Attachments cc: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator TJK:JJ3s • TIMOTHY J. KEANE Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. Attorneys at Law 1500 Norwest Financial Center 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (612) 835-3800 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Larkin. Hoffman. Daly & Lindgren. Ltd. Attorney, Partner 1988 to present . Seventy + attorney firm engaged in general civil practice . Practice primarily in areas of municipal, land use, development, environmental, and real estate law The Scottland Companies Vice President and Legal Counsel 1984 to 1988 . Corporate and governmental legal matters including real estate transactions, land use approvals, contract negotiation and administration, and litigation oversight . Project management, planning, design and development . Site selection and market analysis Popham. Haik. Schnobrich. Kaufman and Doty. Ltd. Law Clerk 1983 to 1984 . Eighty + attorney firm engaged in general civil practice . Principally worked in areas of real estate, land use, municipal, and construction law Larkin. Hoffman. Daly and Lindgren. Ltd. Legal Assistant/Law Clerk 1981 to 1983 . Assist lawyers in areas of land use, environmental, municipal and real estate law City of Shakopee. Minnesota Director of Planning 1979 to 1981 . Responsible for review of current development proposals, zoning administration, preparation of grant proposals, CBD development, and comprehensive planning . taff suport to City Council and Planning Commission City of Coon Rapids. Minnesota City Planner 1978 to 1979 . Current and long range planning, zoning administration, subdivision and site plan review . Staff support to City Council, Planning Commission, and Zoning Board of Adjustment City of Tucson, Arizona Planning Assistant 1978 . Technical assistance and analysis of data for comprehensive plan Minnesota Department of Transportation Internship Summer 1977 . Responsible for environmental issues and policies element of the State Transportation Plan City of Sierra Vista, Arizona Project Team Coordinator 1977 to 1978 . Production of Housing Assistance Plan and Comprehensive Housing Plan Minnesota Public Interest Research Group Staff Lobbyist and Research Assistant 1975 to 1976 PROFESSIONAL, CIVIC AND ACADEMIC MEMBERSHIPS Member, Minnesota State Bar Association Member, Hennepin County Bar Association, Real Property Section Member, National Association of Industrial and Office Parks, Legislative Committee Member, American Institute of Certified Planners Member, NACORE, International Association of Corporate Real Estate Executives Member, Minnesota Chapter, American Planning Association Chair, Shakopee Community Development Commission Board Member, Past President, Minnesota Justice Foundation Faculty, Minnesota Continuing Legal Education Staff Member, William Mitchell Law Review, Volume 10 Licensed Real Estate Broker EDUCATION William Mitchell College of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota, Juris Doctor, 1980 to 1984 Emmanuel College, Cambridge University, Cambridge, England, 1982 University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, M.S. Urban Planning, 1976 to 1978 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, B.A. Business and Economics, 1975 DeLaSalle High School, Minneapolis, Minnesota PETER K. BECK 4746 Sheridan Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55410 Home: (612) 929-8877 Office: (612) 896-3220 EXPERIENCE LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN. LTD. Land Use, Environmental and Municipal Attorney June 1978 to present SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Staff Lawyer, Office of the Clerk January 1976 to June 1978 Research Librarian, Supreme Court Library September 1974 to January 1976 OPPER, WOLFF, FOSTER, SHEPARD & DONNELLY Summer Law Clerk June-August 1974 OFFICE OF UNITED STATES SENATOR HUBERT H. HUMPHREY Legislative Intern September-December 1973 EDUCATION J.D., with Honors; May 1977 - George Washington University; Washington, D.C. B.A., with Highest Honors; May 1973 - Hamline University; St. Paul, Minnesota BAR ADMISSIONS Commonwealth of Virginia: June, 1977 State of Minnesota: October, 1977 District of Columbia: November, 1977 PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS AND ACTIVITIES Instructor, Land Use Law, Hamline University Faculty, Government Training Institute Seminars for City officials Speaker, miscellaneous seminars on land use, environmental and municipal issues Author, miscellaneous articles on land use and environmental law Commissioner, Minneapolis Heritage Preservation Commission Member of Environmental Law Institute; National Trust for Historic Preservation; Sensible Land Use Coalition; Builders Association of Minnesota; National Association of Industrial and Office Parks; Minnesota State Bar Association, Environmental and Natural Resources Law Section, Local Government Law Section; Hennepin County Bar Association, Environmental Law Committee, Local Government Law Committee JAMES P.LARKIN LAR IN, HOFFMAN, DALY& LINDGREN, LTD.D. PAUL B.PLUNKETT F.D ALAN L.KILDOW JACK HOFFMAN ATTORNEYS A T L A W KATHLEEN M.NEWMAN JACK F.DALYLYMICHAEL B.LEBARON G.KENNETH LINDGREN GERALD H.F GREGORY E.KORSTAD WGAN GARY A.VAN CLEVE• ALLAN C.E. ERICKSONRWGAN DANIEL L.BOWLES JAMES J. DRIS EDWARD U DRISCOLL 1500 NORWEST FINANCIAL CENTER TODD M.J.McM VICH TIMOTHY J.MCM ANUS JOHN N.FULLER JOHN D.FULLMER 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH TIMOTHY J.KERNE ROBERT E.BOYLE ALAN M.ANDERSON FRANK I.HARVEY BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 DONNA L.ROBACK MICHAEL W.SCHLEY CHARLES .MOD ELL TELEPHONE (612) 835-38 CHRISTOPHER PHER J.DIETZEN 00 MICHAEL A.ROBERTSON JOHN R.BEATTIE A.GRAY UNDA H.FISHER FAX (612) 896-3333 GARY A.RENNEKE THOMAS P.STOLTMAN SHANNON K.McCAMBRIDGE MICHAEL C.JACKMAN CHRISTOPHER J.HARRISTHAL JOHN E.DIEHL WIWAM C.GRIFFITH,JR. JON S.SWIERZEWSKI JOHN J.STEFFENHAGEN DANIEL W.VOSS THOMASJAMES J.P.QUINN FLYNN MARK A.RURIK NJOHN R.HILL TODD I.FREEMAN JAMES K.MARTIN PETER— E BECK JEROME H.KAHNKE THOMAS J.SEYMOUR GERALD L.SECK MICHAEL J.SMITH JOHN B.LUNDQUIST FREDERICK K.HAUSER III DAYLE NOLAN CILJBERTO• MARY E.VOS THOMAS B.HUMPHREY,JR. LARRY D.MARTIN JOHN A.COTTER• JANE E.BREMER BEATRICE A.ROTHWEILER MARCY R.KREISMAN OF COUNSEL WENDELL R.ANDERSON JOSEPH GITIS RICHARD A.NORDBYE •ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN LOCAL AND REGIONAL GOVERNMENTS REPRESENTED BY LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. AS SPECIAL OR GENERAL COUNSEL TO UNITS OF GOVERNMENT (PAST AND PRESENT) Afton Litigation: Comprehensive Plan Analysis and Review Afton, Lake Elmo, Woodbury, Washington County Interstate I-94 Route selection and Environmental Impact Statement Adequacy Litigation Becker County Environmental Special Counsel for Landfill Issues Brooklyn Park Environmental Review and Tax Increment Finance Plan for Highway Interchange Bloomington Tax Legislation Bloomington Housing and General Counsel Redevelopment Authority Burnsville Environmental Review of Sanitary Sewer Project; Comprehensive Plan Review and Analysis Chanhassen Metropolitan Trunk Sanitary Sewer Funding and Construction; Regional Systems Policy Plan Amendment Chisago County Representation Regarding Landfill Superfund Matters Including PRP Group Search; Consent Order Negotiations and Insurance Recovery Circle Pines Tax Increment Financing LARIQN, HOFFMAN, DALY& LINDGREN, LTD. Local and Regional Government Representation by LHDL February 12, 1993 Page 2 Crookston Township Zoning Ordinance Deephaven, Excelsior, Tonka Joint Subsidized Housing Project Bay, Greenwood Dodge County Representation Regarding Resource Recovery Contract and Landfill Matters Eagan Comprehensive Plan and Rezoning Litigation; Environmental Impact Statement Litigation Eden Prairie Wetlands Regulation Consultation and Permit Processing Elk River General Counsel; Drafted Entire City Code Including Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances Hennepin County Environmental Issues Hennepin County Regional Light Rail Transit Railroad Authority Isanti County Representation Regarding Landfill Superfund Matters Including PRP Group Search; Consent Order Negotiations and Insurance Recovery Koochiching County Representation of Renegotiation of Landfill Stipulation Agreement with the MPCA League of Minnesota Cities Special Counsel - Employment Matters Insurance Trust cities Plymouth Brooklyn Park Bloomington Stillwater Oak Park Heights Owatonna Albert Lea Worthington Mankato Cannon Falls Hibbing Virginia International Falls Warroad LARIQNN, HOFFMAN, DALY& LINDGREN, LTD. Local and Regional Government Representation by LHDL February 12 , 1993 Page 3 Long Lake General Counsel ; Representation in All Civil and Criminal Prosecution Matters Louisville Township General Counsel; Specific Emphasis on Solid Waste and Land Use Minnetrista Park Legislation Intergovernmental and Legislative Representation Minneapolis Legislative Minneapolis Park and General Counsel Recreation Board Minnetonka Litigation: Section 1983 Defense; Environmental Impact Statement Administrative Procedures Moorhead Growth Management Plan; Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances Moorhead Township/Clay County Zoning Ordinance Preparation Oak Grove Township General Counsel, Update Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Regulations Prior Lake Special Counsel relating to "The Wilds" Ramsey County Real Estate Tax Litigation: Defense of Action brought by 3M Company Redwood Falls Landfill Acquisition Operations and Liability Issues Regional Transit Board General Counsel Rice County Representation Regarding Purchase of Office Building on Superfund Site; Representation Regarding Ground Water Contamination Issues Saint Cloud State Highway Bridge Regulations : Administrative Hearing Saint Paul Environmental Legislation Environmental Impact Statement : Shepard Road/East Central Business District Bypass Project LAREN, HOFFMAN, DALY& LINDGREN, LTD. Local and Regional Government Representation by LHDL February 12 , 1993 Page 4 Sauk Centre General Representation Regarding Superfund Landfill Including Listing Issues, PRP Group Search and Consent Order Issues; Third Damage Claim Defense Scott County Wetlands Regulation Consultation and Permit Processing Sherburne County Tax Exempt Bond Issue Shorewood General Counsel , Zoning Ordinance Update Woodbury Interstate Highway I-494 Interchange; Economic Impact Analysis; MUSA through Metropolitan Council; Wetlands Regulation Consultation and Permit Processing • WCG:AT6a LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY& LINDGREN, LTD. PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM Please find set forth herein a very preliminary outline identifying proposed objectives, tasks and schedule for updating the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance. 1 . SHAKOPEE ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE - OBJECTIVES 0 Update Ordinance to reflect current Comprehensive Plan, community needs and values . Develop Ordinance that is "user friendly. " Land use regulations that are clear and consistent . 2 . TASKS Target Completion from Tasks Start of Work A. Discussion paper to organize and focus identification of "problems, concerns and needs . " The discussion paper/outline would elicit comments in the areas of apparent or common concern. 4 Weeks B. Prepare annotated outline of Ordinance format. Provide examples and references regarding alternative approaches to key issue areas . 4-6 Weeks C. Draft ordinance. 4-6 Weeks D. Work sessions with Planning Commission or Task Force through public information meetings . 4-10 Weeks E. Revise draft ordinance. 2-6 Weeks F. Planning Commission - - public hearings (as needed) . 4-12 Weeks G. Consideration and adoption by City Council . 4-8 Weeks Total Weeks : 26-56 Weeks LARHIN, HOFFMAN, DALY& LINDGREN, Lm. One of the major issues for preliminary discussion is what body will be the "working group" responsible for the development of the Ordinance. This would logically be either the Planning Commission or a task force made up of representatives of the Planning Commission, City Council and community. TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Disbursement of City Funds DATE: February 26, 1993 Introduction Legislation is proposed that would enable Cities to permit staff to pay bills before Council authorization subject to Council standards and procedures. Background Please read the attached proposed legislation. This issue originally came from counties. The State Auditor was preparing the bill and contacted the League to see if cities would be interested in the same enabling legislation. This bill would allow Council to delegate to staff the authority to pay bills before Council approval. The resolution permitting this would set forth the terms and conditions for such delegation. Circumstances that would be beneficial to the city for such payment include; early payment to take advantage of discounts, payment of utility bills to meet due dates and keep the accounts straight and the need to issue a check on short notice for things like conference registrations or to send a check with an order to a supplier that requires prepayment and the goods are needed before the next Council meeting. The process used in Shakopee is that the bill list for council approval is actually a check list so that council sees all checks that are issued except for payroll checks. Therefore Council will see all disbursements that might occur under this proposal if it is implemented. Alternatives 1. Contact the League to indicate support of the proposal. 2. Contact the League to indicate non support of the proposal. Recommendation Staff strongly recommends support for the proposal. The legislation is only enabling and Council can decline to make use of the provisions or Council can use it subject to whatever restrictions it desires. Action Requested Move to direct staff to contact the League of Cities to convey the City of Shakopee's support for the proposed enabling legislation allowing city staff to pay certain claims without presenting them to the council for audit. Issue 17 HOUSEKEEPING ISSUE IXQWING CITY MANAGERSIADMINLSTRATORS TO PAY CERTAIN CLAIMS WITBOUTYRESENTING THEM TO THE COUNCIL FOR AUDIT:. REQUESTED BY LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIF,S Section • Minnesota Statutes 1992, section 412.271, Subdivision 1, is amended to read: Subdivision 1. Method. No disbursement of city funds, including funds of any municipal liquor dispensary operated by the city, shall be made except by an order drawn by the mayor and clerk upon the treasurer. Except when issued for the payment of judgements, salaries and wages previously fixed by the council or by statute, principal and interest on obligations, rent and other fixed charges, the exact amount of which has been previously determined by contract authorized by the council, and except as otherwise provided in subdivisions 4-and-rr, 4. 5 and 6B, no order shall be issued until the claim to which it relates has been audited and allowed by the council. Section _. Minnesota Statutes 1992, section 412.271, is amended by adding subdivisions to read: Subd_ (A. Definition. For purposes of this lection. a "city administrative official" shall mean a city manager. city administrator. city sreasurer._eity clerk, or city clerk treasurer. Subd. 6B. Delegation of authority for payingcrjain claims, A city council, at its :.1- •i . r-ti• o: h ri .r .a in: ■.in him mad :.-', h- i, . city administrative official. City Councils opting to delegate their authority forscviewin,claims prior to payment pursuant to this subdivision shall have established internal accounting and 8dminist ative control procedures to insure the proper disbursement of public funds. The • •.;:• . I. 1,11 in I d- re:ul: . . _• . I i i if he Cit :! --'i' r • . ' , '•1 by the council, A list of all claims p id under the proceduies established by the City Council shall be presented to the Council for informational puToses only at the next regularly seheduled meeting after payWent of the claim, A city council that delegates its authority to oav certain claims made against the city must adopt a resolution authorizing a city administrative offil to pay such claims which meetshe standards and procedures established by the Council. A city council of a city that dues nut prepare annual audited financial statements which have been attested to by an independent ceztltfed public accountant. public accountant. or the state auditor, a �• • ri for _• '--- - uAil Lim -:sin i e • • , subdivision. Renumber Subdivisions accordingly. CONTACT: Joel Jamnik LN1C 490-5600 ) 5t There are not anticipated "budget versus actual expenditure" problems within division totals apparent at this point (2/93) for the 1993 budget. Attached is nt out on data showingthe asebudget of that datetus as of 02/26/93 for 1993 based 1 ti ti 1• 1` 1` 1` ti 1.- N. N• N N N N N- r— N II N. I,- II I- N- 11 N. N II H I 1- 2 I LU W 1 C7 U I 0 CY I M W I CO 0. 1 I M N '0 J `0 N '0 '0 .O N .O 'O N N .0 O O J CO J II 50 .0 II J CO II CU MI 1 1 II Ni Ni II N O N N. N O Ni P s- 0 0 s- J O M CO t!1 P O II II • • II • II LA , • • , • . •_ ' • - II Ni Ni II Ni O Ni P '0 Ni .O N Ni Ni CO `O `O `O P P N II Ni NiM II �" • II Ni Ni II N N P CO �O N N N O ,O .t CO CO P J P J II J J 11 00 CO 11 N N 11 LEI .- J O P O r Ni J Ni f` .O .O IA O NiM J N II .- . . II . . II . II II 111 p (7 CO J CO P N. J to Ni J N N N P .- J J N J Ni N n N N O NJ Ni NJ 0' II O O OII O II - II 11 0, II • II II I- 0 N II II II II ....1r CO CO II O O It J J �� O 0 II II I s- s- O• 00 CO •- Ni O O ,O O O O Ni 1U s- 11 0 1 II II II II 1- W I 2 0 I W 2 I U w I LU CL I LU X I 0. W I 1 CO CO II II CO `O 0 O N in N O N. P Ni '0 O '0 II '0 �O II II O O 11 II II InP II O O II '0 .O II II II (Si N P (Si Vl J P Ni J N- ti t!1 VA N O N N N II II II II II II 00 J Ni J .t .t CO 0 P '0 `O 00 .t 0 N P Ni II Ni Ni II N N II II II NiN N O Ni 1!\ (V J .O II II II II CL wN < 0 H I I W /- Q II >- O 11 11 11 11 II I- II z 11 W W11 00 ,O O to .- vO .t CO ti .- in .- N O Ni II d ,O II O O 11 O O II LUca. 1- O `O N N II NiM .t Os .t CO .t N- In O Ni CO J Ni Jo N t '0 J O II O O it .t J II II 0 1— II '0 to Ni `O Ni P P Ni In 1- .- .t 0' 0 co O P II N N �� '0 '0 II 11 Y Q II _ r- M `O II N N II II II Q d I- J II In O `0 J r- In `0 N- in CO N. N N N 0 II N N II II II x W Z x d II N r, Ni II II II it Ln 0 LU z N- II II LL >- CIC 0 U II O m 0 X d II II U r IA II r Lit I I II U 2 W I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I O O II O O I O O II 0. Si)OVO II N- t` I O O II X I .t I- .0 .t N J .O NJ N CO P N N .t in O r- O CO I O II CO O 1I J J II W I . N- P N CO N- P O t` 0 ti P to Ni O J II . II J . t P P II I P .O O J C0 J N M CO N N CO In M N P I- N- I '0 0 II `0 50 I CO CO II 0 0 ! Ni CO CO CO II Q w N N N '- Ni CO Ni .O Ni V1 r- P I NiM NiM II I 11 I II 0 0 1 .- N 1 II 2 O I Z 03 I d m I I I I 1 0 1 Z0 I LL I C7 I 2 1 > I J 1 O U > 1 U U W I I = Q cc LL z _ I y CO 1- Z 7 I I 2 _1 2 2 LL p W I 0' 0. Q 0 0 1 O 0 . Z LU r J M Q Q I J Q -J 0 r 2 U d - CY H W I U K J M J W Q LU 0'' Z I- I--. -0 1 U H W CO CO J 2 J W Q CL Q I Z N In , C7 J W J z LLO1 W Q j H Z Z Q Z O 0 LU Ce _ = U I 0 Z Y O 2 0 ,__, C7 I- 1- I U LU O .-+ Q O M J C7 W LU °'� 1- U J 2 J 0 J w I atJ U CWj U Z W w Q LU d Q '0 Q U W H E Q W OJ H Z 1"' F- 0 I 0 >- >- Q Q Z W -. W d ,-• W 1 Y m J CC J O 2d 0 >- Q O 0 r I >- r 1- 2 C7 Q > J CY N C7 CIC O CY Cts O U Q J ,-• a I Q r o--. W J O 0 .-. 2 2 H W x Q Q 0 2 d U 2 H I M U U LL J CL C7 0. LL W N N 0. C7 0. KD W I N M 11 `O 1- CON M N J VO CO O 0 I Ni Ni Ni .t •I J J `OP N NJ O a; a a P4 a' H H H H H H H H 0 0 tri � H H H H H a C4 w O CO a6 z 0 z w r, dl U1 U1 0' 0 CO U1 M H dl di dl N CO 0 N eO O 411 0 M U1 0 O O 0 0 00 0 O d1 dl di d4 O O 0 0 H N 0 �� 00 H ..-4 H O O 0 0 H H 0 H M M O O 0 .O N M N M 0 O 0 N CO M M 01 N N N H CO dl N u H H N N U1 tx N N N N dl dl dl N N N N N di dl I I O CO N41 CII N N N N 'O CO H 0 0 0 0 0 H HN 0O O 0 H H ,-I ,.4 H H N U In COH H H 00 N CO CO CO CO CO M N Ul a0 CO a0 a% ko U1 0 0 a' a' Cn O+ O' 0 %.O Z H Z H w w g a 0 H Z a >4 z w H Q O. HH DI U w H H O4w CA U 0 a H Cl) 41 A 0 W 0 >4 H in N A CO1I (1:C11 I01 0i H COIM a 0 N Z 111 H E4 0 °' It Q H H H N N 0 U U) W 0 N w MI API Gil 0 tilU w w w w HCA H C4 pA w 0H p. U to CA N VI 0 ix 0 43a w �, di A H AA cO LO 4 01 Cl) M 0, a w 0 pa 0 a 0 c c otC en 0 a 4I 01 Or w zz s a jw a r' a s a w f 4 0 tfl a a 0 c ' * * * * 44 * * 44 * 44 * * * N U1 U1 N N H O H M M C71 O a' O O N N M M N N Ill 111 O O dl d. Ill U1 ON N N H H CO CO O O dl a N N C N N N N M TN O O 01 O 01 O O . w M M CO co H M 111 O O M 111 CO Ill Ill N N Ill U1 a0 a0 M M H H Ul U1 CON CON Cu 0 CO CO CO CO d4 M N 0 0 C) K1 t? d) dl H H t?t? M M H H N N Yn<? N N U1 U1 M M H U dl O O M VT d� f?N d. dl N Vf VT t? UT N I..� . . . . .Vf Ill U1 N N 4„ H H H H M M U1 U1 U1 11/ H H H H (s. 0 t?t? t?t? f? t? t? t? t? N N N N N U w O IL' 0 rzl VEl l 11.1 O' N N N N 01 O+ Co CU CO CO CO C p 0 H H H H N N N N H H H \ \ \ \ \ Q A \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ N \ N N N M M N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ 0, \ \ \\ \ \\ \ M Cc) M M M M M b4 0 M M M M M M M M 01 O' 01 Cn O1 O1 O1 O� O� Cn OI C7+ CT CT CT 01 OT ON 01 01 Cn 01 r0',I '' 01 H 41 131 CC.) � CT H H H H H H H H H 0H N M OHp .0'-1 0 10 N CO Cn 0 O% 0H ,..I H H H H Z CT O' CT0 M n M n M n MN n 0H 4i 1O n 1O n 10 A '.O n 0 A M n M n M n M n w M V M V M V M V M V dl V d1 V d1 V dl V di V dl V di V d' V 00 U N oaalxoa 10! d Z 00 04 t1:1 01 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 04 0 0 rn 0000000 0 0 0000 0 a as g a W 0 00 a i 0 z W H O In U 0 O M .O 0 H In .11 in K1 1!1 In m 0 M M a0 O at M M M M M M M MCO 0D O+ O' as at 'O r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'O O H � 0 00 '0 00 '0 0 NO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N N N 0 N N N N 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 00 N ,-1 M 0 N N N N 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 N N N di d' dl 1d1 1"I H N ��--11 H H H H H H H H di M 0 in in NNNN N M pt$ N N N N N N N d a a s d• a a da d' in W d• di dl d di di TIP d• dl dl I I 1 1 1 1 I I I O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IH H H N N N H N H H N CO H 4-1 N N N .Ni M H .-1 N N H H ✓ 0 .-1 N O H N N M rl dl N N a H �o d1 H M M �o H 1"1 H N N N M d• M H d� �o %1:,0000000 0 0 0 '.0 '.0 '.0 0000 0 U) 41434141 0 W U U U U U U U H H ZZZZ 41414141 CO Haaaaaaa CO ZZ04 0.e 04 04 114 Al 1:11 ad tA ZZ GI p, H H H H U CANVIVIVIUC ggg3 41 0000000 0 to W Z Z Z 0 zzzzzzz H 0 0 0 rN�� H Z 0 to q H H H H H H H VJ M V1 H H H H H H H H W H 0 0 irs, Al rel A Mggggggg o0 aM H H w k+ a W WWWWWW W 0 HHH 000 0H 0a00001 1 1 � a0 0000000 g 0a WWWW U W 04 W CO U m N V1 CAU H 0 3 U 3 3 3 H x Z H 0 VI 0000 0 % UUUU H U di W r M 0 Z O 0 0 �. >• >1 >+ H 0 as a I:4 g g aU a 4 tn H UU (qg979 H El El 3 5 5 U) H w q PPa9 0 WWWWWWW 2 z z z ..... WWWWHH H� ; 41 H En Z CD 0 00000 � � 44 Enr4 (11al 0Mt 0 '. * 44 14 * 44 * 44 * * * N O ‘11In .l1 o N o O N M M 0 0 0 0 N M in in d d Op UI N N In 1i' d' 0 0 0 41 • .11 dl N N di CO N CO CO O O O O , . . . , . . . . . . . W a' '.0 N CO 00 O' N N H H 00 1,0 0 0 di di M M co CO 111 N H Cr N N N .11 In In • 0 N H H N N N N 0 H H '.0 '.o 0 0 N 1� 10 10 M M U1 0 d• H O' '.0 '.0 00 coin. ON V} H N H H Vf N O H H 0 O, m M N t? 00 CO Cr) M VT VT N in. V?V} in. H t?UT VY Vf t? - t?VI` t?V> C4 H N. N N M M X0 1/40 H H VT V) k. U tp 44- 41 x p4 U El WH HHHH .- 1- H •1 H H H H H H H H ."1H H H 0000000 0 0 0 Op 0 0000 0 O0 M M M M M M M M M M 0 OWG q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O \ \ \.......\ \ \ \ fit, \\\\\\\ \ \ \ M M M M M M M M M M U U M M M M M M M M M M O'. O' O. O' O. O. O' O' O'. U W ON ON CN cr%a% D\ ON ON ON ON ON ON O% a' ON ON ON O1 O1 O% ON MI U H H H H H H ON 11.4 H 0\ ON H H H H H H H H H H H H U • CO D` 0 0 H N M d� 111 �O t-• N N 0 H Z 0 N N N N N A N /� N A M H N A M A MA MA M A MA MA M M V d1 V di V di is N * N is N is N * N * N is N U U dN, V d� V d� V •dIV d� V a V a V d� 0 VI • U M CO U) 0a U) U) U) U) 0 Q 04 U) 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 al 5 a C74 w a i 0 z 43 O� .-1 N M U .-1 N M d Ill ,O 0 n co d d in N U1 d d d d d in di ko `pO `O0 0 0 vp 0 0O0 0 0 �0 O %0 O mO 0OO %O 0 ~ pp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 Itl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 N 0 in CM N �y1 N in M di in M N M Ill a in di in di di d in d1 en di in d1 M d1 d1 dI d1 dI di U i I I I I I I N I I N N N N N N ,-i CO ,..I ,-I UN d N N N M N N Ft N N N N 0 N 0 '0 %O %0 0 10 MO �O �O 0 �O 0 IO 0 O ZH 0 H Z H U U W U H H Z a a a H a H S 0 0 a. U) H O U 41 a z CO 0 ,� co U 0 H W EI 01 Z C9 0 M A x a x x U (z Z CA H H H I� H Hq Vhf a H w H W A �2 °H" U) a w �1 H a w w H 0]0 W CO U GAO w COAa o a al U Z U W H CD x U A 41 0 z U H Z H H z Ui H Hz a 0 H 0 wH H O U) U H U 7. z CO U U) 0 W H '0. Z U H CO UUs 0 U 4 0 N W H 024 7 U) 0 U O U a U 0 El H H El H H H El ECO 6+ >4 a 004' U) W H ElOtg A CO 0 El aI.� A CO a% In bOrj D H W W r] N H o4rn to) r� a a, U H U) «rets H .� A A W CD CD CD U U U U A A A N O M M O O Ill Ill N N 03 CO M M 0 0 d d 1O '.O 0 0 0 O O III COtr1 0' 0' O O 0 0 d d '.O '.O CO to N N 0 0 d d 0 0 in N U) .0 O• • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • 4.. In N N M M N N CO CO in Ill N N it, d N N 10 IO O' 0% NN NN N ,N-1 N N 0% ON N d d NN ? N N d d {? M M IlM N ON 0% ON N.H t? VT N N ?t? ` ` d d %O 1/4O .-1 ,-1 g Ill 1/411 al 01/4 co.co- ,-I t-4 N.t? V!M. t?t? Uco.v.,- 43 W A U) U 41 vH1 W ,•-t H El 0 0 0 ,I H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 41 0 \ \ \ \ M M M \ \ M C+l M M M 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 0\ \ \ \ S. \ M \ \ M C. \ \ M M M M M O V M M M coM M 0 a% a% a% a% a% ON O% a% U W a% (3% a`a+ m O% a%% a` a% al a% oI a` a% a W a` H .I ,-I .-4l ,-I .-I .-4 5C U '.-4 ,-i .-I ,-I4 UM a 0 .-4 N M d In %O n cCo M 0 H N M M M M On d d H en en en N M A MA M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A ZO is is N * Nit N * N * N * N * N * N * N is N * N * N 'A W V d v d v d V d V d V d V d V d V d v d v d V d V d V U U m 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 14 til 13:1 M Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Z w 0ca 134 0 z wH d1 IlLr O\ 0 M H N d1 In uo tl1 0 1lIn in �O 40 N0 up %0 up .p O% up0 %0O up O up 0 uPO 0 '.0O u:)O %.oO 0 0O0 H 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 O 0 O0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 0 0.-I 0 OH 0 0 N 0 N N M M M Ill M M M M 0 in rd en enw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d1 d1 d1 d1 d' d' I I I I I I I I I H H NI N O CO H .II .N-1 e-4 d' d1 H N M N M H HN H C) N C.) o 0 0 N 0 0 up 0 0 0 0 '.0 '.0 N o 0 0 V0 0 0 0 Cl) w w w w C) tlH H 14 (4 H H z r4H U1 H .J .J H z a H x OG 14 H v14 14 14 W 14 14 H a M t CA H UH In 1n H Cl) a gU U) Q N g Q y N a z z p 0 In In en a U) 0 z CD o 0 0 on z z \ to H H z m U) Iz-1 H 0 a In In H H a14 r41 0 n H H H w 43 IQ-7 C4 121 H H O H a 0 al 0 U w 0 0 IYl N 1 N N g H a 1 ( pG y H H x z Cl) vUi H 04 0 Q 14 U) U H H 14 H w H 0 ta cN Z H H 0 0 y H H U `" ti 0 `� o a a 14 1 N w 0 O - Z 0 0 0 8 z N Oa0 0 CC) 0 w H z 0 Q wa' a 14 n • C) vUi v°1 c>4 K O 0 rn as t*+ en as 14 0 0 g 1 1 ED w (s H N up '.D 0O in in HH 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 .i H 0 0 0 0 N r- 113 0 O d' d' O O In In u1 In 0 I• u1 r r r • o• o• • • • • • • ,� u1 I• • �o w UO %0 N N d1 d1 Cu H H O a0 �O �0 In IA H H CO CO 0 0 O 0 U1 ul N N d1 d1 N N t?t? O O N N UI IA Ill IA H H N N CO00 COO lt1 Ill t?t? t?t? t?t? dI d1 N N t?t? d' d1 tQ N t? t? ifT N H d1 d1 0 t?t? d' d1 111 H d' d' to t? ti) 114 g VT t? U Ill (4 14 U 14 H H H H H H H H cil H w H H H H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H 0 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \0 en 0 en 0 en 0 en 0 en f\ f\ m0 M 0 en 0 en 0 en 0 o o 0 \ \ M M AG \ \ \ \ M M M M M M 1'I M M M M M a' O. O. On as a' 41 C) O. O. O. O. C:Ila. O' O' O' a' as a. as Q� T W .0a.H a.H H H H H H H H H H H O C) H '� U �,� d1 In �0 N 0 r CO0 0 H N N �p U1 Ill U1 d1 d1 d1 M A M CH) tl+ ,y1 d1 M A m A M A M A M A M A M A M N M A m AM A M A J x d V 0 V d01 V 0 V 0 V d01 V d01 V 0 V d01 V d01 V d01 V d01 V 0 V '1' 0 U in m Z 0 0O 0 0 00 0 000000 0 0 0 0 04cd IX W o m a1 0 zCAI in UH N N N N N N 0 M in n H N M M CO O. 0 0 N N N N N N 0 N N N .O N n n .O .O .0 .O .O .O 0 .O 0 .O 0 0 0 0 0NO O O 0NO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 aiai 0 0 00 0 000000 0 4 4 O 0 00 0 000000 oN 0 O O Ill 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 en 0 00 0o r, CO CO CO COCOw O: M d dl N M M M M M M Mcr di Cnd W d1 d1 d1 c! d1 d1 d1 d 441 TV d1 Ti, Til d1 d1 O W 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1H 1H 1H N H .-41I .'1 -1 U 'i N H .-I .-I .1 ill N N .-4 N N CO CO .-4 .-4 N '"1 U N d1 a O 00 00 ..00 0 000000 0 .0 0 0 H zH H z H HCA Cl) g H U H U U Z ).7 > Cl) > 0 H 0 W r7 U 03 04 U U U U U 41 0 m W H U 04 HHHHHH U m U > > > > > > 41 Z W Cl) U Cl) 0 O Cl) ti) m en en to m 00 U) U 0 �z77 CD N (sMH I-I HHHH >4H W 41 Q Cl) H rm m Z m H H H H H I-I F-4 H W 0 111 , H 0 0 Ca Z H H H H H H H 0 H 0Z U gag 0 a wo g X55555 a. 0 0 U U Uz z Q CD H 04 0 U La 0 CH443 W a H 0 W al HOH�S7 H 0 U Q W G tom UR z i0 W W x IH N UUUUUU CD H 0 W 4 0 " HH y, 0, nm Hmmmti) mm 000000Hto0H a H Cl) H 04 M cW 0 O• En El) En 14 0 0H H H H HHiiiiii H a O. OVm 0 1-4 '' W U HHHHH H 0as g z zM z zzzzZz z o. N * * * * # # # * * � C4 - 0 0 0 OO 000 OO 00 TP 1/40 9 OO. OO 0 all ilill Ill O. OO O aN0'. � N W 0• • • • . _ . • . • • • N n O N N 0 0 M N O 0 0 O. .-I M N M d� .0 n n 00 O U) N k. 0 .-I NO 0 0 d' TY CO N .-I O. 0, 0 0 CO CO.O. ill ill N •"1 N n N 1l1 .O Vf VT O. Vf N d. VJ,V} .O •t N 0 .-I .-1 V} c? V> N H 0 V>N CO .O Ill .O .O n V 0 0 UT Vf t? 1-4 M VT V> VT Z d1 •-4 .O 0 0 N N V!V1 114 14 t? V>V>t? N N V> V> U UT 40 W W OG U W .-1 .� •-I H H H H H rl .1 1-1 .-I .-4 .1 .-4 .-I .-1 H O Cl) H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ \\ \ \ \\ \ M M M M M M M• M M MO O A M M M M M M M M0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ \ \ \\ \ U U M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M • M M M U U O. O\ O. O. Q. O. O. O. O. O. O. a. O. a' OO\ a. 01 O. O. O. O. O. O. -4O. O. O. O. O. O. 01 � 01 01 � U H 1-1 '1 .t .1 .-I _4 .-1 .-I -1 .1 .-1 1-4 .-1 rl '.1 U 0 0 .-1 N C'l o In .O H .O .O H Z 00NO NO .o NO ill illA M n M A CIA M U U A mA m A M A M /� M A M n M # N # N # N # N g U # N * N # N * N # N # N # N V d1 V d1 V d1 V d� W V d V d, V dP V dI V di v di V d1 0 U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn al 04 1 Ix w 0 a al 0 z w �o U N 0 CO CO CO CO 03 CO H 0a� CO 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 en N 00 400 a' FH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 en 0 0 0 00 0 H 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o% a% 0 0 O 0 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N CT M .-I N N N M 1[1 111 N N R; 0M d N in en • N d d d d d W M d d d d d I I I I I I I I I IN N ,-I .-i U 01 I I 1 N H d 0 H .-IH N H COr-i d r1 .-1 .-1 N NN N d H 0 N 0 0O v0 10 a% .0 10 V:30 0 a1 0 0 %o H O z H H a UWcnw H U Z \ U) 4 W m IA D W H H H1 4 ix 04 th 111 111 H Ix:U y 0 a H 0 01 Z O w v, N \ 0 CO N 01 m n CD 0 H po CO W U EA O C9 CD CD r� H z Z ZZ Z A W H H H H H U N H HH U0. IUi1 0 0 a • 04 H H CA Z CP W H H H 0 0 0 0 41 41 H c0) ai 04 Ca 00o P3 0 04 W w 0 0 0 0 04 04 U U g g C144 41 H Z H H N H x a 0a' En o w m o z U 0N HH ,:cO U 0 0 0 a H Hen 41 4 c4 UW H 1S w 0 0 H W E-I El El H to rilz a H 1 H 44 CA h Z H M H El El H H z U U CO CT CO 01 to 4 a El W 0+ ,� 1 1 1 Z z 0 0 a U a a a N * * i 1n u1 0o nn oO 00 00 0 nn man nn `D 0 0 O 0 O N N 0 0 CO CO 0 0 0 0 O O• O• O• n• n• N• N• �O• 10 �; �; 0� 0 OO O • • • • • • • • • W •to OO u•11I1 anal OO dd 0' 0' 0+ 0, 00 00 00 co T1, C3, in in 00 4. 0 N in In H .-i %O 00 M M n n 1n 111 00 ,-.. -4 a, a, CO CO N N .-I ri N t? t1) .-1 .-It?t/) t?N d d 111 111 t? t? N U) V)tO In In M M t?N 111-t? H V)IA H H M CO N N k. DG to tn. (/)N N N N t? U W 04 C4 U WEl cn GI H H H H 0H El 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,-I .-i ri 0 0 e-1 H0 _ CD \ \ \ \ M M M M M 0 M 0 M 0 p en0 0 en O 0en 0rn 0en 0 O \ \ QL \ \ \ \ \ \ M m M M M M en an Q 43 U en en en ena'. a' a` a' cn a1 Os a' a' a% a` 0' a% trzao ts1U H a4 H H H H H H H H ,-i H ri �i U H H H H U CO a+ 0 H 0 0 .-1 N M d 111 N n CO CO N N is z N N NM A U bG A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M N U V a V V di V a V a V a V N v a V a V a V a V a V a V 0 U U n r� o) 0en 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 al rel Ca MI ITI Ca 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 afa C4 W 0w I 0 z W 0 t[1 0 0 n Q` 0 0 0 0 0 M .i N M cri O O O CO a' 0' M a' a' a' a' aO' in 0 'O0 'a0 'o 'o 'o 'o 'den coN VpO '0 'O00 '0 OUIN H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 en n 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 di 0 0 0 0 N N M O M 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 M 0 F M H M .-1 H d1 N ) M N N d1 N C4 d1 M 0 N N N M N N N d1 d1 d1 d1 N d1 d1 d1 d1 d1 d1 d1 � I I I N W I I I 1 O IA - . 1 .-4 .Ii .f1 rI _I H H H in 'O N cli0 •„1 N UN '0 N N 111 N M N d1 d1 N h 1-1-4 H N H M T. H di H M H M d1 N CO 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 41 CA Vl pUW A0W W H M 14 CA CI) co co VV W H H H W H H rel IX Z H Cd as a aOl H w Ili U) as a a H , aH a a a U Q UULs) 0 z U H 0 0 0 H 0Zz 0zHNU z H H W W 1"I H IA 0M U H W Hg 04 14 0 U) W CO 44 U3Ri H H H Is. • U) ill 0 0 a s 0+0 a a 0 Ot 0 g H 0 ] 0 A. O A. 0 0 0 W a 0 0 W a H ao U A 0 U Z C) H g H W 1-1 Z 0a w wIL. w 6+ ✓ U 0 0 0 0 00 H A W >+ >4 >+ V 0 00 43 E4 i aU HW0z d1 H H H H 7 S M \ U U U U W0 H a >+ W W 0 El W El WWWW H H 0 W D WWWWE`' O z 0 UU M H O O O 114 1 H 4 Vl 0 cr% El 1'6 00 1 0 i# x a y H 1 H H A V H U) VI V1 W V1 N * * * * * N 00 00 00 'OnOM 'a NN nn in in N'O u1 'O1r1 00N 00 00 00O 0Ill tr01 00 Ul H H COO O 00 a' A O 0 O O O O 'O N O N H n n , • . W N N 0 0 VI l/1 N CO N 0 M Co co d1 0 d1 0 0 d1 H H 'O 'C H Cet H d1 lfs d1 in •-,14 i G+ H V?CO- N O7 COH •H in In 0 0 H H 'D 'O 0 n n 'O 'O n n t?yr Vr V? CO H H 'O 'O %.„:„D O 'O Vt in. CO CO i H v>t? in.H H V} yr V?V) V)OT VT UT V>V>• H y y N n a N(? (s. Gni U W U) U) U W Fl HU) •„1 H H H H R H H r'1 ^ '-1 HH H H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO 0 0 0 0 W 0 \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ MM MO M M M M O O O O MO en O MO MO MO MO MO MO MO b4 \ \ \ \\\\ \ M M M M M M M M M M M M M cr% M M ON ON ON a' a' a' U) W a' a' a' a\ a' a\ a\ a' a\ a' a\ a\ ON ON ON ON a' a' a' a' H H H a' H H H •1 H WW' V _4 ON_.I H H H R H H H H H C,l H N M d1 en 0 0 d1 in 'O n coa+ a' r7 z N 0 U) Co co co co co a' ON H M A M A r•1 A M A M A M A M A M A m M A M A M A M * N * N * N * N * N * N * N * N * N U N * N * N * N V d1 v d1 V d1 V d1 V d1 v d1 V d V d1 V d1 W d1 v a v d1 v d1 U0 U co tr0 0 0 0 tc:0 Pa Pa Ill 0 0 a H H H H a H tri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ib 04 a W 0 Ia a1 0 z w U1/4C1 ao as 0 N H 0% 0% OD CT 0% H CO Oa 0% 0 O O O� o+ 0� 0� 0� 10 �o M 0 0 V0 NO 0 0 0 O' 0 0u1 u1 0 u1 0 H 00000 MIC) 0 0 0 H 0 O r1 00000 O+ u1 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 .-1 M 0 M H nh CO CO .-1 .-1 .-1 M M H O% N CO Cn .-1 .-1 M H p; N LV N N N M M o en doN N .yI N N do N w do do di di d0 d' d' I I I I I 01 O I I 1 I I I H N M H 0 'D O O U H .1' N NH H l dI rl N .-1 H N H U N do N N H COIt) .H-1 N H do 00 H CO CO do CO a 4:340 0 0 0 0 u1 %0 0 0 QI 0 Os Os 0 O' O O O O O � 0 z H z H W 41 ril co U U U Pao H 4 O H H H g.w V Q W W H W a H aaa GLS U to U H p. p. a "Fi U H H w H UV) ,j y H H a a c0 cn Z U CO y H a z a H to H Z C� z >4 0 O M H H z z to M H H >4 H 0 0 H Hry� HAA W W 0 H 04+ W Oa 's, H I g W g a a k. H w H CO fs. H H 0 H 0 H UN aaa00 pa' U p w H w k. s. N O 0 0 co co a U co a CO ww ELI co v, a a 0 Z El H D• 9 0 p H ag xg g H 4143434141 H a H ti) V) C4 to N to to N 0 H a a 4,11 ZA HH [N� HHH �HI ►a7 0 °" a la M > ZZZZZ CO CO W WW >4 0 w � Z W HW OaaaP4 ill HH H 4 .-1 - C7 0 0 0 0 c' W >4 H H 0 Z U U OG en 0 a% HHE-IHH H g a W 01 cm H H H H H co co 0 H nnn m › 5 z a 1/40N utt` ,n LnONP 00 00 00 00 N„4 N,..4 0000 do � � n ,N :;;Ii .4.--1 p0 CO El O+ co •-1 ,n In in s0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w .-1 di O 0 •-1 u1 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 In u1 dI do ON T O\ OI N co_ %D co_ co_ '0 ID 0 .--4 M '.D CD M '.D N 0 0 d0 dI N N u1 In dI dI %0 '.D H H In O IuCO CO V) N V) H V) N In CO CO en.V) u1 u1 0% O� .-1 .-1 CO 00 M M O. u1 d� N N H V) CO-V) .-1 .-1 u1 u1 M M do do CO co N 0 0 (s. D4 in. V) N V) V) V) V)N V)V)•-I .-1 .-I V)V) U W U) p; U CI) u1 In H H u1 u1 u1 N N El H0 H0 H 0 H H 0 0 0 0 N N N N _ H0H o0 000 0 • A \\\\\ \ M N N N NN �7 M M M M M 0 O O 0 0 00 N0 MO O O O O 0 0 \\ \ \ g, \\\\\ \ \ \ M M en en\ \ M M M M DG U m M M M M M l"1 M O• O. OI On O. On On 0%% 0% O% 0% 0% O. O' O1 OI 01 0% OT ON ON 0' chH U w O4 H 0%H H -4 v. H O� � U .-4 .-I .-I .-1 .-I rl .-1 H H H .-1 rl H H UCO O In '.D N CO Od + 0 ' In 0 0 0 H z 0% 0% O` ON O. 0 0 o H U U * N A M A M A M A M A dI A dI A di A ON A dI A d_ A W V N V V di V a V a V V d V .0,31. ‘, V V d' V d' V U0 U ON 4) i fli al at CU C4 04 111 H Cri H H H H H H H H CiiSal C4 W O CO a 0 z W U H M M M d1 d1 d1 O CO CO CO CO CO CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 U1 U1 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 geil 0 0 0 0 0 O O N O 0 0 0 CO CO M N d1 c! .-1 .-1 N N (dC N N N N N H H W d1 d1 dd1 d 1 1 d1 N N U1 ,ItI II1 I I -I .-1 H N M N 0 0 U H H .-1 H H H H H a M M M M M M O co 0 0 0 0 0 0 Os as O c.1 U U H N 1n M H ti) �st-1 HA. a�y A N ZW H M g w a a H H O > 0 H iiii d'NUMM0WUo a a a 43 ELIET3 U Uin 8 Iin n'-' aga N * ONH O O H CO N H M M0 O H I� d 0 0 U1 O\ M N 0 N N N N 111 W Ex. , a' O% N 0 O s.O M as H H O O 111 0 .-1 M co-'.O N t?Vf M \O %0 H .-1 0 ,` N V} N U) U) U1 U1 co-co-H H µ UT H 04d1 0 r tad Ot in U N W O R; U W H In W U1 U1 U1 111 111 U1 U1 U1 H H N N N N N N N N U --\ \\\ \ (a N N N N N N N N O O O O O O 0 0 bd \ --• \S\ X U M M M M M M cn el Ol U W as as as as a' as as 41 U OOO ' at ' ON ' ON a% a. H H H H H H H H U a 0 ON 0 H N H H H ,-1 U D4 0 A d1 A 6:1 A 0 A �j" U N * N # N V N V G,, W d1 V d1 V U U .4 m a+ m a d1 O 0 el 0 0 0 0 0 ,4 %0 0 a0 n 0 0 u1 M Ln ln M to ‘.0 ON O tl1 n a0 a% WI In U, NO N 0 H N a0 'D 0 n M N an til 00 v> 10 n n VT V) M M VO k0 CO rl N .-1 p N AO- t? N V0 U, .-I V) N its N M as ON H 4) N AO W fs. E4 AW 4 cD H 3 t U) 6. a W o poi U) H H HH W H H 0 ga a . E4 0 >4 0 z N 0 El a C '4 U En a w ac O .� dt p 4-4 to O O O O W .-4 N N M .t M .-1 di UO 0 .-4 d� d1 di n n oo CO H '4k Ik 4k 4k 4k 4k lk U n 10 0 U C ®SENT SHAKOPEE FTRE DEPARTMENT Department Memo To : Dennis Kraft , City Administrator City Council From: Frank Ries , Fire Chief Date: February, 23 , 1993 Subject : Increasing of members to the Shakopee Fire Department . Background: . It was approved by the Shakopee City Council in the 1993 budget to increas; number of fire fighters by 3 members to bring the department to a total of 38 fire fighters . Recommendation: Approve the resolution to increase Shakopee Fire Department man power by 3 . To give the department total membership of 38 . Respectfully submitted, Frank Ries Shakopee Fire Chief RESOLUTION NO. 3751 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ESTABLISHING THE SIZE OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. WHEREAS , City Code Sec. 2 . 32 provides that the size and composition of the fire department shall be established by the Council by resolution; and WHEREAS , the City Council now desires to increase the size of the fire department by adding 3 members . NOW THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: That the size of the fire department is hereby increased from 35 to 33 . The actual number of firefighters in any given year may vary, but shall not exceed this number. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee , Minnesota , held this day of , 1993 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest : City Clerk Approved as to form: __�� City Attorney- -/' CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: T.H. 169 Bridge and Minibypass DATE: February 24 , 1993 INTRODUCTION: plans and which approves the final p e and Attached is Resolution No. 3752 , of the T.H. 169 Bridge specifications for the roadway portion Minibypass Project . BACKGROUND: 169 Bridge and Minibypass Currently, the bridge portion of the T.H. engineers have estimated tion. Mn/DOT 1993 . ted that the is bridge will wll tbec completed by September 1, The that bridg contractor is Lunda Construction.Mn/ of to bid the grading and roadway portion theDpr is now prepared consists of constructingthe project . This part of the project O f f ice. m ass and all remaining associated construction. Final plans are corOf f the are rompleted and available contract, reviewe City Council Engineering rape Prior to letting the plans and specifications . The bid letting is scheduled for March 12 , 1993 . ay The biduisiting hass been delayed several months due to rig problems, but all right-of-way issues have been resolved and the project is ready for bidding. Mn/DOT engineers are hoping to have the roadway and bridge open to traffic by November, 1993 with final construction and clean up the spring of 1994 . With good weather for the 1993 completedtruby1993 construction season and contractor incentivesabout the November, the project on time, Mn/DOT is p construction deadline. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 3752, A Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications for T.H. 101/169, State Project No. 7005-60 (101=187) within the City of Shakopee and move its adoption. DEH/pmp MEM3752 State Project 7005-60 (101=187 & State Project 7009-59 (169=5) Fed. Proj. NH-BRNH 005-2 (104) RESOLUTION NO . 3752 At a meeting of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, held on the day of 1993, the following Resolution was offered by seconded by , , to wit: WHEREAS the Commissioner of Transportation for the State of Minnesota has prepared: plans, special provisions, and specifications for the improvement of Trunk Highway No. 87 and 5, renumbered as Trunk Highway No. 101 and 169, within the corporate limits of the City of Shakopee, located at Jct. TH 101 and 169 to Minnesota River; and seeks the approval thereof; NOW, THEN, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans and special provisions for the improvement of said Trunk Highway within said corporate limits of the City, be and hereby are approved including the elevations and grades as shown and consent is hereby given to any and all changes in grade occasioned by said construction. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City does hereby agree to require the parking of all vehicles, if such parking is permitted within the corporate limits of said City, on said Trunk Highway, to be parallel with the curb adjacent to the highway, and at least 20 feet from any crosswalks on all public streets intersecting said trunk highway. Upon the call of the roll, the following council members voted in favor of the Resolution: and, the following council members voted against the adoption of the Resolution: whereupon the mayor and/or the presiding officer declared the Resolution adopted. Dated , 1993 Mayor Attest City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF SCOTT ) State Project 7005-60 (101=187 & State Project 7009-59 (169=5) Fed. Proj. NH-BRNH 005-2 (104) RESOLUTION NO . 3752 At a meeting of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, held on the day of 1993, the following Resolution was offered by seconded by , to wit: WHEREAS the Commissioner of Transportation for the State of Minnesota has prepared: plans, special provisions, and specifications for the improvement of Trunk Highway No. 87 and 5, renumbered as Trunk Highway No. 101 and 169, within the corporate limits of the City of Shakopee, located at Jct. TH 101 and 169 to Minnesota River; and seeks the approval thereof; NOW, THEN, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans and special provisions for the improvement of said Trunk Highway within said corporate limits of the City, be and hereby are approved including the elevations and grades as shown and consent is hereby given to any and all changes in grade occasioned by said construction. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City does hereby agree to require the parking of all vehicles, if such parking is permitted within the corporate limits of said City, on said Trunk Highway, to be parallel with the curb adjacent to the highway, and at least 20 feet from any crosswalks on all public streets intersecting said trunk highway. Upon the call of the roll, the following council members voted in favor of the Resolution: and, the following council members voted against the adoption of the Resolution: whereupon the mayor and/or the presiding officer declared the Resolution adopted. Dated , 1993 Mayor Attest City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF SCOTT ) CITY OF SHAKOPEE ) I do hereby certify that at said meeting (of which due and legal notice was given) of the City Council of Shakopee, Minnesota, on the day of 1993, at which a majority of the members of said Council were present, the foregoing resolution was adopted. Given under my hand and seal this day of , 1993. City Clerk R12143D.r1 4/c MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: l/ Dave Hutton, Public Works Director 1. SUBJECT: 1993 Street Reconstruction Projects DATE: February 25, 1993 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 3753 , receiving a report and calling for a public hearing on the 1993 Street Reconstruction Projects . BACKGROUND: has ordered the preparation of The City Council of Shakopeestreet improvements : feasibility reports for the following 1 . Atwood Street, 4th Avenue to 5th Avenue 2 . Fillmore Street, 1st Avenue to 4th Avenue 3 . Naumkeag Street, 2nd Avenue to 4th Avenue 4 . 4th Avenue, Fillmore Street to encer aumkeSggrStreet 5 . 8th Avenue, Atwo1dtd SAvenuereet to Sp to Shakopee Avenue 6 . Spencer Street, The proposed improvements consist of complete ste street reconstruction led for these segments of City streets . Staff coa single feasibility report addressingthe costs and proposed assessments for these projects . report has been completed and the report is The feasibility ublic hearing is required on the attached for Council review. ifAthe plans and specifications should project prior to determining the be prepared.b Attached is Resolution o. 3753 , whichg oh receivesthe prthe sed feasibility report and calls for a public improvements . staff will give a presentation on each At the public hearing, and the City Council can select set inividually wegmevof ments of street that they feel should be included in whatevee r seg the project . The next regular Council meeting that the public hearing could be in April . Due to the lathe numberhe mb is forthe involved in this meetingt Council combined public hearing, of propertiesjust for wish to set a separate Council meeting City CouncilublieaY If that is the desire, staff would suggest this public hearing• for the street improvements be held on that the public hearing in March. The attached March 30 , 1993 , which is the 5th Tuesday resolution sets that date for the hearing. Staff would like to hold these public hearings as soon as possible in order to get the design underway for bidding and construction this year. ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Adopt Resolution No. 3753 , which sets the public hearing for March 30, 1993 . 2 . Adopt ResolutionNo. 3753 , 33 , but set the date for the public hearing for April 6 , 3 . Deny Resolution No. 3753 . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative March to adopt Resolution No. 3753 and set the public hearing ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 3753 , A Resolution Receiving a Report and Calling for a Hearing on the 1993 Street Reconstruction Projects, Project No. 1993-7 and move its adoption. DEH/pmp MEM3753 RESOLUTION NO. 3753 A Resolution Receiving A Report And Calling A Hearing On The 1993 Street Reconstruction Projects Project No. 1993-7 WHEREAS, the City Council has ordered feasibility reports for the following projects : 1 . Atwood Street, 4th Avenue to 5th Avenue by Resolution No. 3722 adopted on December 15, 1992 . 2 . Fillmore Street, 1st Avenue to 4th Avenue by Resolution No. 3722 adopted on December 15, 1992 . 3 . Naumkeag Street, 2nd Avenue to 4th Avenue by Resolution No. 3722 adopted on December 15, 1992 . eag 4 . 4th ResolutionAvenuNo. eFillmore Street to 3723 adopted on December k15, 1992 . by 5 . 8th Avenue, Atwood Street to Spencer Street by Resolution No. 3721 adopted on December 15, 1992 . 6 . Spencer Street, 37211st adoptedAvenue on December15,Shakopee Avenue by Resolution 1992 the ity AND; Eeference toREAS, the rtherabove projectseand hist has een rpared yC report Engineer with received by the Council on March 2, 1993 . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of the above streets by reconstruction in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting and benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost atanthe eestimated total costuant to Minnesota oftthe improvement Statutes Chapter $1, 297, 110 . 38 . 2 . A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 30th day of March, 1993 , at 7 :30 P.M. or thereafter, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, at 129 South Holmes Street, Shakopee, Minnesota, and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. 3 . The work of this project is hereby designated as part of the 1993-7 Public Improvement Program. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 19 Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR 1993 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM WHICH INCLUDES IMPROVEMENTS TO: ATWOOD STREET FILLMORE STREET NAUMKEAG STREET 4TH AVENUE _ 8TH AVENUE SPENCER STREET IN SECTION 1 AND 12, RANGE 23, TOWNSHIP 115 SHAKOPEE SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date Registration No. 19133. FEBRUARY 1993 — f TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. Introduction 1 Scope 1 Background 1 - 2 Proposed Improvements 2 - 3 Cost Estimates 3 - 5 Funding Sources 6 Special Assessments 6 - 7 Conclusions 7 Appendix INTRODUCTION The City Council of Shakopee, Minnesota ordered the preparation of — feasibility reports for street improvements to various streets as listed below: 1 . Atwood Street - 4th Avenue to 5th Avenue by Resolution No. 3722 . 2 . Fillmore Street - 1st Avenue to 4th Avenue by Resolution No. 3722 . 3 . Naumkeag Street - 2nd Avenue to 4th Avenue by Resolution — No. 3722 . 4 . 4th Avenue - Fillmore Street to Naumkeag Street by Resolution No. 3723 . 5 . 8th Avenue - Atwood Street to Spencer Street by Resolution No. 3721 . 6 . Spencer Street - 1st Avenue to Shakopee Avenue by Resolution No. 3721 . SCOPE This report evaluates the feasibility of reconstructing these streets . All existing infrastructure elements (streets, utilities, — etc. ) were evaluated, improvements recommended, cost estimates of the proposed improvements prepared and funding strategies developed by this report . BACKGROUND These streets are located in the Original Plat of Shakopee and in — the East Shakopee Plat. A small portion of the area is in unpiatted lands . — These streets are some of the oldest in the City of Shakopee . The streets and utilities were constructed in the 1940' s and 1950' s. Improvements to the streets have since been limited to street patching and seal coating. — — 1 These streets are similar to the other street reconstructions done recently. The existing pavements are extremely deteriorated to the point where they require far more than normal maintenance . There are many transverse and longitudinal cracks, large areas of patching, severe crown problems and curb and gutter deficiencies . These streets generate numerous citizen complaints on an annual basis and has been on the 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan for several years. Where sanitary sewer exists it consists of old, deteriorated clay pipe, with many service connection deficiencies . Where watermain exists it is the original cast iron pipe . The existing zoning of all abutting properties is R-2 , Urban Residential . PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS A. Roadway The existing pavements on those streets with curb is 44 feet wide. Width varies on those streets with no curb. It is proposed to reconstruct the streets to their existing pavement width of 44 feet . B. Sidewalks Several areas have existing sidewalks . This report recommends replacing any existing sidewalks . New sidewalks would be installed on streets as included in the Comprehensive Sidewalk and Trail Plan. C. Sanitary Sewers The existing sanitary sewer are 8 inch clay pipe except for 12" clay pipe on Naumkeag Street and 10" clay pipe on Spencer Street between 1st and 3rd Avenues. It is recommended that all sewers within the project limits be replaced with PVC pipe. Additional stubs may be needed in intersecting streets in anticipation of future sewer projects . Any service connections that are defective would be replaced from the main line to the property line . It would be the 2 individual property owner' s responsibility to replace the service line from the property line to the house. All service line replacement would be assessed to the benefitting property. Any manholes that are not built to current standards would be reconstructed as part of this project . D. Watermain Discussions are currently being held with Shakopee Public Utilities (SPUC) to determine the scope of watermain work that _ would be done as part of this project . The final plans will incorporate any watermain replacement work as requested by SPUC. Due to the age of the existing watermain and presence of copper service connections, this report recommends to SPUC that the watermain be replaced as part of the project . No cost estimates were prepared for the watermain portion of this project, since the actual scope of work has not been determined by SPUC. E. Storm Sewers New catch basins will be needed in order to improve the street drainage. No other storm sewers are anticipated. COST ESTIMATE A detailed cost estimate can be found in the Appendix. A summary of the estimated costs are as follows : TOTAL ASSESSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT COST AMOUNT RATE Atwood St . $ 38, 785 .31 $ 8, 913 . 67 $ 891 . 37 Per Lot Fillmore St . $ 76, 236 . 88 $ 14,469 . 53 $ 545 . 02 Per Lot Naumkeag St . $ 80, 884 . 38 $ 11, 307 . 06 $ 601 . 27 Per Lot 4th Ave. $349, 538 . 75 $ 58, 244 . 85 $ 15 .48 Per F. F. 8th Ave . $202, 132 . 56 $ 28, 238 . 73 $ 12 . 84 Per F.F. Spencer St . $549, 532 . 50 $ 99, 568 .44 $1, 229 . 24 Per Lot 3 ATWOOD STREET, 4TH AVENUE TO 5TH AVENUE Street, Curb & Gutter, and Sidewalk $ 28, 207 . 50 Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 28, 207 . 50 Add 10% Contingency $ 2 , 820 . 75 Subtotal $ 31,028.25 Add 25% Engr. and Admin. Fees $ 7, 757 . 06 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS $ 38,785.31 FILLMORE STREET, 1ST AVENUE TO 4TH AVENUE Street, Curb & Gutter, and Sidewalk $ 47, 445 . 00 Sanitary Sewer 8, 000 . 00 Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 55, 445 . 00 Add 10% Contingency $ 5 , 544 . 50 Subtotal $ 60,989.50 Add 25% Engr. and Admin. Fees $ 15, 247 . 38 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS $ 76,236.88 NAUMKEAG STREET, 2ND AVENUE TO 4TH AVENUE Street, Curb & Gutter, and Sidewalk $ 37, 200 . 00 Sanitary Sewer 21, 625 . 00 Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 58, 825 . 00 Add 10% Contingency $ 5, 882 . 50 Subtotal $ 64,707.50 Add 25% Engr. and Admin. Fees $ 16 , 176 . 88 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS $ 80, 884.38 4 4TH AVENUE, FILLMORE STREET TO NAUMKEAG STREET Street, Curb & Gutter, and Sidewalk $206, 460 . 00 Sanitary Sewer 47, 750 . 00 Total Estimated Construction Costs $254, 210 . 00 Add 10% Contingency $ 25, 421 . 00 Subtotal $279,631.00 Add 25% Engr. and Admin. Fees $ 69, 907 . 75 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS $349,538.75 8TH AVENUE, ATWOOD STREET TO SPENCER STREET Street, Curb & Gutter, and Sidewalk $123 , 580 . 50 Sanitary Sewer $ 23 , 425 . 00 Total Estimated Construction Costs $147, 005 .50 Add 10% Contingency $ 14 , 700 . 55 Subtotal $161,706 . 05 Add 25% Engr. and Admin. Fees $ 40 , 426 . 51 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS $202,132 .56 SPENCER STREET, 1ST AVENUE TO SHAKOPEE AVENUE Street, Curb & Gutter, and Sidewalk $338, 275 . 00 Sanitary Sewer $ 61, 385 . 00 Total Estimated Construction Costs $399, 660 . 00 Add 10% Contingency $ 39, 960 . 00 Subtotal $439, 626 . 00 Add 25% Engr. and Admin. Fees $109 , 906 . 50 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS $549,532 .50 5 FUNDING SOURCES A. Streets The Assessment Policy of the City of Shakopee establishes the mechanism to be used for street reconstruction. This policy states that 25% of the reconstruction costs will be assessed to abutting property owners . This would only include streets, curb & gutter and existing sidewalks . B. New Sidewalks It is proposed to assess new sidewalk 100% to the abutting property owners . C. Storm Sewers All costs of the limited storm sewer improvements have been merged with street improvement costs. D. Watermain Watermain reconstruction is uncertain at this time. Any proposed watermain improvements would be funded by Shakopee Public Utilities . E. Sanitary Sewer The majority of mainline sanitary sewer improvements would be funded by the Sanitary Sewer Enterprise Fund. Any streets that receive new sanitary sewers would receive a 50% mainline sanitary sewer assessment if the properties are currently served by City sewer. F. Service Connections Any water or sewer connections that are found to be defective and in need of replacing will be assessed directly back to those property owners . 6 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Street Portion It is proposed to special assess 25% of the street reconstruction costs to those properties abutting the project limits based on front footage or per lot . A complete assessment roll and assessment calculations for each street can be found in the Appendix. Sidewalks New sidewalk would be assessed 100%. This assessment has been estimated at approximately $8 . 75 per foot . Sewer - Water Any water or sewer service connections that are found to be deficient and replaced will be assessed directly back to the benefitted property. The sewer and water services are estimated to cost around $10 . 00 per foot each. A separate sanitary sewer assessment roll covering any main line or service line assessments will be presented at the public hearing. Other No other portions of the project would be assessed. CONCLUSIONS All streets included in this report are extremely deteriorated and in need of reconstruction. The pavement is beyond any further preservation and requires higher than normal maintenance costs . The sanitary sewers and watermains are the original systems and should be replaced. Sidewalks should be constructed on both sides of Spencer Street and 4th Avenue . Property owners would be assessed for 25% of the street costs. Spencer Street and 4th Avenue are part of the State-Aid street system. This report concludes that the reconstruction of all streets is feasible and recommends the improvements as stated in this report . — 7 APPENDIX PAGE NO. Project Locations 1 Existing Sanitary Sewer 2 Existing Storm Sewer 3 Existing Watermain 4 Assessment Areas 5 Atwood Street Cost Estimate 6 - 7 Assessment Roll 8 Fillmore Street _ Cost Estimate 9 - 11 Assessment Roll 12 - 14 Naumkeag Street Cost Estimate 15 - 17 Assessment Roll 18 - 19 4th Avenue Cost Estimate 20 - 22 Assessment Roll 23 - 27 8th Avenue Cost Estimate 28 - 30 Assessment Roll 31 - 33 Spencer Street Cost Estimate 34 - 36 Assessment Roll 37 - 43 V) (I) Z > a - ® 0 Q w WY W • U WLLI < Z QQZn. > o a O Z NJCD W = I— = Q I— � = o ® 1.1.11 �WO I— wW � w C) ( O FO w � O OO w1- F- U) I— D ~ (n I- I-- I— D (f �_ c� Z V' 0 • z Qw Ww W � w W WW ~ L.L.1 > � QQQCK U Q CC O UQ OO M O Z O M LI x 0IDO J1— 2 S 2J — QZ � 't �--) W z v �— 00 Q (1) ,—. Q 0 IIIIi )O O O C •Oy yi:f,, ������ Vat O O O O meet toms 0000 0000 "" III/II. sassm 1 V2,TIN17Sses ' . • ^ _ I' . .I .... �_ 1 m is r ! `, 'IS Immo . • .11111 1 � V 1 5k' Ig ..- v� 7'_�� 14Yts 1R _ i _ :v10 31a1rae /-\ 'mil r '15101 s lig.. Nt- 7 5• _1 •'� � MVG lk �� �1 '-- x•1••1 w` _ �� pLiiiMe N ail 1111115 'rel 0• 7 ^ 13 • F . _ N 4 si it .;iimmuly _ V105344114 MIME II lit NM * OMER .... 1ha 1 V':I • • 15 tI t.(•.1.°0•0,'•„.7 ___„,,___ , • O• ■ itS .Sim O . O II linl3xtrow ct .coni■ p _1101 IIS/7'�� 0 u. nr■r■ �G:, 8 m Gam* f. cr,■ �uury tt..M + aa31+3a$ g►i ► ' nr i.uh■rr`e■ 1IRlpru■ _ • �� wm.ip�io\10061 i�,Y r•,00•_NrrUtS■_� ■.e:ru.iPry� , e • ■rll.lrr'I/IrCUT1S.. IIrJArrrll���� u42.nu...-i ...r•... .n■eek■.0 OM* ■shz ^ �irsoa 112110a.111111110•11 ilikl >g ,* - WI ,W7 • WI ii-11 tt 411 IMAM id vita Si 10'8%4 . ,tik io.,..levon mom I loots ..„„... ,,rmai 2/141 1 Opo it • l� .tr 5111 it i ham• _ 0111111 _ ....."*'**''. lima a ri,... „ ht. it ;:41 VA%II iirml_HiL.11 - et WI � �� , .... . �� iii 1 b?..-•reo lia • •--.• 14t toil N tEll V) W i Ew W Q o ® w (f) ct wY • • U ww Q Q w O Q Q w Y Z - 0 < I-- _ _ Q S ® E— w ~ w ~ o W = w � 0 w *- t• F- w w —Jr • ( o � O w � O ( o wF-- ~' Cr) F- D F- (r) F- (17) 1— D (n 0 z • z (� < LU UJL • w ALU w ww I-- YQ o � Qo UQ oQ <ao � o z o �.�& CD mD O1_ w I- S = Z Qz J0 I-- � a- V) I- I-- 1- _J — ZN w � ooQ cn � Qd d w 0 H. ' ►IIIIIi ' ram ., o°o o Cf) II/III4 10■••• )0 0 0 •ti. ���ASN 000001 )0 0 0 C • ►IIIIIi 101100. 0 0 0 0 10000* 00•001 0000 W , , ,`_ i_ ill I 11/110 - - .S 1 114 Y S"��1611 g WA n M a�vg,' 0 �w��e v�� 7S IllI11I =`•••• \ WM it.. �' �• 7�� ':0 or r1 r °�,� �;:. µ, 1111" mono m dnuniill _ 1111110 S�i ,,,,,,,--,.. ...":r..... ,,,!�,, is-i. t a� g. :_ . vn ora sia% Ws W.% Mil0. 'on .1"°-. •-'. IN I � 1111112 111110ta N Mal EIin" 111!111 �; wow i t �'�' 'ru3iW!I ft:raw .1.6-1 U111 r1,tA ,„a icet+.' =, • %pii• `,• ,� • • �' L> > ��1 Tt II lI{11 isfigillr, 1110. 1 011r7. 011___. 00';r =0251�, '®. 1 �. !'! ' mumflUT 1 UV, r yr �s,r, .;t ©�es, �� �iii no rt. oes ko.v. '/. r. I-:_s.' ::' =!! e • - �d .n� Q 41**'"- s �t •tire. a.■_-des., :n... N_ 3 'u.' 1,1.x. r� Pcsr••U' .r f^E.t:_S' ,._ �+ iiiiiiM %.1,1 V:4',."0.\\eu:iiiEi'�'rc.:. .•--..a�ii„_-.uf. ryr77.w ._t_. dw.ros, WI -:;iii er..rae�.:uu )::a'-- ...11-AA s.vet�6 r r- *+r ■.■)o►*WO ASA TOOK .w l — _ �� s Irk.' ■ t f r,� r+ rrM r � c+� �✓•J •="'ci■3}��e y� �r A •;,,,urn r�iVi"�=— .� f re. irwxs� s%11- A '' a wil w ::i co..., r Ails.�� - Ad.p Iirs " � 11li f�41 • aro la 00 Trii Vi micS Trio' . roil Om •01 111+O i 00.•'' w.' Awigte, r 191 s 0~' d� '+iiiiia• • y _ 0uu• la_ le • 14. .N4 a'e W.• via �'O r'r A: •116.0 +,'o o p s •r' "� e:e A o• ►-:® _,I I113111 11111_1 --clo 1'11 r r� d Wiz,FL;" • I h° 1 1 1=1 111115. — •rrM �'A A•'A .A 4A srri = �s s+� OA AIlia :� rs+ I •s �r s• r ss o .`'„sr11i��IS CIIIIIIC 1111 'i � A t .0 Y d itr- Iva {l 1 ill 1 11 111 'i r lJd 0 • Z W ; w O 1 � > Q ® Q w W w w a Q o a z v w = i- w _ =Q I O O CL w � 1— � w � 0 ww O J � 1--. ww I- cO O w • 1--• 0 � 0 wI- - F- V) I— D F- V) (!) o z z Qw w w w w ww � > o > Qo � Q oQ Qo CD Q Q O z O W Z Do JI- _ w1-- _ _ QZ -I V) II- V) I- I- I - J -- - I— Z N Li- ,- COQ V) - Q d- d- li IIIIIA ■ sees.'X F � i�,i�I�ii� : ii.�.1..0 000 000 Q_ W u: % ����,����, ■ i.i.i.ii� 0 0 0 0 Ali� ,�.. ,, I , ,0 - _ I �11i110 1 EMpriArrill _ ow'-- 1.61 *OMa -• a z�7 milm : ` • co -' �= �� �� ris/Drliff 4pbmwiserAll.sip, '1S "ill - ti� 1-1 d �'vs p �tillitsi 11 111111:11 y�� , $;; -frit so ' 00 Y„ 91L Iv7a iipirini Mar ,, "[I- - I% �e �d � .C,0�11110 1: re� m: i g:' ::g � • `, d111IIllll 1�a m e e soy G t 1 II - -= 6::. I 0111111.- r1 . _ d::; tT watt...-rte:: Imo -II�1�1� .-11111111 1 11--"°. ''''-'1".1Agii 51-Xt.trA I ri t lit Ereij r.--1-1111 2-111111 1111111 .. . ,„„,,,„. 1 ,_„„ ...,,. .,,...„, ....., _ •,.. Ira, sr„ .was log ...AY ris ..!---7--.2..mm-rimerif imilimminli tiniging!rp. 1.1111111 111 ( dtIc. � rii � ltier riir l: . ���o3iioar `"1 1 1 ii; a I IIIIii= —t n.£ O l�afil� •, ysiiisiodu ..._ ngl. I " rc• 41 _ ut.n: ,u _ : �-- lSG.■RERR.71F� r 0. 1 � i^• ll tM _-^n111l:::.■r:n11c-. Rr.i :6i..■,�� �ddU.$ Z ■d —iII �_ Ai �151. :r . :w.... .R : v � _ IlI1� - •tetart;i r � et ;:•gal I=1121111.111114 11 tip sI d d'p l ..4•4.0.. 110 i 1 1 ,....v, t ill I- .,. mss A 1--, 0 �� OW614 reirls oil. sl q oil 00 . A4 t1.111 tio411 , , ----- o ...,,s,,,.._,,,, N �'e ,„„,.,,Arr.;.� 0 1.10 -vim 111 I I I I'� I'��. 1-1,i �'d INV oo �' •••a. ......d dlds4' o vr ' r oma! e• __ 11 a b W.� �d 0 rWwr�r®v I� �l I I •1 - — V d ® Q CC Q w W F • U w w • Q Q w0 Q Q W o- Y Z I— w = = c/) w � w1— W O w � � � 0 0 � � � w w V) O 1- 0 w • CC CC 0F— I-- (f) I— 0E- V) ~ 1— I— 0V) 0 (3 Z V . cn • Z I— Q . wW w � w w ww w > Ct > > 0 w > 0 > > � Z Q 0 .(c Q ° Z Q O Q Q W I— D0 —I I— _ � I-1-1 I— � _ _ I QZ —I V) oQ � v- a � � � OM resect i �, ■ Awn impms, 0000 — W MIP ,I,I,I,I,I, Ar„„ a )O O O C Et �••i IIkA 0000 O• III/IIi ■ pm. 0000 1 , st:•*4 ■ •..ami )O O O C ,I,I,I,I,I, •impa1 oOo0 1 - I 011110 1111 - . -� : TimMiliwitrAgAtirm. am; ■� ���ew Is is his t_ ,,..„,,, o ', Iq:- ' �,-`,i Q,� 13 t,: STI riz BM l s, 3Y;tflØIUV/ifltfIii �I '�r ran♦ai s 4fI0Tt!!jiU!W1Ill e II— ' 1 ;� se d ' Al �6-1 1 rnimis ..— '!i! ! mu— .la act a/ ■■ `h011 ;m — ®� it tvi�,0 we p'� '� : - !I'iI!1llll 1 , I I I I I I Il� Is tot `' A� r` ,' ` -ate �I-I .�S r, Ir .0_7(a;1. IIHN11! !!!!111 JHig WE EE IIIIII�" m' . f l I IEI MIME. vs' �I `i` -.iii r�_ ./' T..^ 'R'i'o, As in iialEg5i l..111A �,_;isa in., - I •Nh� to u` " 1 u3� ■113Mili1■S�S11a i1.e1 = Mo - '_�Y; .. �ri� �1�a �4K' /1144*--�t�'':u��`.�,�.w-c.ari.r�iul�_s MINIMS 1 ►�`+:C,%�' u�.11iiSP.r1 USS.•-• e�.wili=_FEn' �.� wu:f 1 ii'u_.,urye:• .es:ius,lop;r_yEf: _ l!S' Iriiii.prrr,■ �..'�..�ii>t,-:l�!s...-s �' ��31r• STs l rl� ■ll4G■�U:GI��. rte �� i 4■ �ir ■ioi liiepr. lururtV r i %s A i��► Ellie= ; $ 14 des.ll�s,g* e d y��r-�d n s itrt,. tis�li�u s,„-0, ito P`�� r ms r g �.. �*.,ow.`., i "03;,.ril1iv tminpA K� ~Ana irli~ V0 9A , % 111 �ii�= Ni e VI tirci' a tli.1.0 Iiiii 01 a �,� o �I _� VI* VI 1 I .�tl, .�r*0 ''o 10 �.. ii �d a :r 1-III11111 11111•I -a% ars a 11��� isoil,oil d � WI y�1;aa Id I VI 111'1 i1111�. WO •Ira r'' pc+ 00r • or i �• r' } $ ns �I ial 1- 1 I 1 I 1 iiii "it r' tS w 1="%4 oma' lar,rs oleo iv s.,1ock Via II 0111,. — teW.e a VI11 I iiti �a 'e ,� 11111111 1111_i _ V d (f) • v > O a — 0 < Q w W w W w U w •w < Q w O Q Q Y Z F- Q = ® � � w � 0 w � w � o Z I- CL Ce w —J W V) 0 F— 0 w • F- 0 � o w n E- v) I- DF- v 0 Z V' . V) . Z I— W > � >• > ° w > ° > > � - U Ya 0Q ao Za oa a3 1 , i W _ � 1.1.1 I- _ _ W < Z J W I- F- d (l) F- I- I- _ - ----) Cl) Z N w ,- 00 Q (n ,- < d- d- w ® (_ d l4 w7773 "•'• o0ot ������ ' i..coi�.I :000 . ������ ■ .....r o 0 0 0 • .' 1IIIIIi ••,... P.M. I..... 0000 ~crr. ,,,,„w. �� ■ 1....• CI na n.insarw „ .4 • — 1 - _ /'1/ - is irwnvws 7 a • • I * Lt 3 • a • e a 1YJ > • dd �� Fi_I� AY':s' _ 7 _ 3lalrad ts 113� 1 -. . . . . 7. • . Grp • : • m • i8 viarr■ .r 1 ll lei • - Y • • - P1 • T.-- WI F _ H N 11 r 0..0..>.. 4 *II\WI ..%.1111.M.Vir ,. WK. _ 7,.i Sys5. w ` Irl�� • r1,0 • O. •O00. O L _ n l - vac, ...4 IA._ ,... .. •, Air $44$A0,,:.00.." Ic. Euu. NI MI1111 lin a uuilcs: -_.i is { . a3,w3d, d tt 1W.r� w by�11n.. —,i..vet u.¢.........!:i eal. WUI 0 • a . ■CL .■ i..�..uu�1 : tit. 10: 'V 11 ,..n,ir l=ri..uwtua' ■..�..ulu I:1: _ ka u.i,,.l.n{e.{:.o.- 1::..9n...�,F.•smt - b' .3��tn { • a3NOS { 1...1..■.:S...A■...h55 ,{..r,.riiNallt *VI iii w, is S . , - a II Si 'ib� 1 1$•$- Villi ti.e1 t9 ifwd fitp PEW s t ... i op a � k+; I,AJ 1 r0r WI It ;. z. n 111 IP% illi till a - - -- 1 1 Pi 11 a VI VA: ,. 13 I it 1111 OS 1 I t VI II Oil.. . 4 . „,. • it lad PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ATWOOD STREET 4TH AVENUE TO 5TH AVENUE ROADWAY ITEM CONTRACT QUANT. QUANT. UNIT TOTALS TOTALS NO. ITEM UNIT 44' WIDE 36' WIDE PRICE 44' WIDE 36' WIDE ROADWAY ROADWAY , ROADWAY ROADWAY 1 Clearing EACH 2 2 $100.00 S200.00 S200.00 2 Grubbing EACH 3 3 $100.00 $300.00 $300.00 3 Remove Pipe Culvert L.F. 0 0 $5.00 $0.00 $0.00 4 Remove Curb & Gutter L.F. 700 700 $1.50 $1,050.00 51,050.00 - 5 Remove Sidewalk S.F. 3200 3200 $0.80 S2,560.00 $2,560.00 6 Remove Pavement S.Y. 1500 1227 $1.30 S1 ,950.00 $1,595.45 7 Remove Conc. Driveway S.F. 0 0 $0.80 $0.00 $0.00 8 Remove Catch Basin EACH 0 0 $200.00 $0.00 1 $0.00 9 Remove Storm Manhole EACH 0 0 $250.00 $0.00 $0.00 10 Common Excavation P C.Y. 600 491 S3.00 $1,800.00 $1,472.73 11 Subgrade Excavation C.Y. 50 50 $3.50 $175.00 $175.00 12 Aggregate Base Class 5 TON 530 434 $6.25 $3,312.50 S2,710.23 (100% Crushed) (6") 13 2331 Base Course (1 1/2") TON 130 106 $20.00 $2,600.00 $2,127.27 14 2341 Wearing Course TON 130 106 S22.00 $2,860.00 $2,340.00 (1 1/2" Modified) 15 2341 Bit. Mixture for TON 0 0 $40.00 $0.00 $0.00 Patching 16 Concrete Curb & Gutter L.F. 700 700 $5.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 Design B-618 17 4" Concrete Walk S.F. 3200 3200 $1.50 S4,800.00 $4,800.00 - 6 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ATWOOD STREET 4TH AVENUE TO 5TH AVENUE ROADWAY ITEM CONTRACT I QUANT. QUANT. UNIT TOTALS I TOTALS NO. ITEM UNIT 44' WIDE 36' WIDE PRICE 44' WIDE 36' WIDE ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY 18 6" Concrete Driveway S.F. 0 0 $2.00 $0.00 $0.00 Pavement 19 8" Concrete Driveway S.F. 0 0 $2.50 $0.00 $0.00 Pavement 20 Sodding S.Y. 1200 1200 S1.75 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 _ 21 Relocate Exist. Tree EACH 0 0 $200.00 $0.00 $0.00 Max. (6") Diameter 22 Furnish & Plant Shade EACH 2 2 $250.00 $500.00 S500.00 Trees, Green Ash (Frax. Pennsylvania) Marshall Seedless 2" Diameter 23 Furnish & Plant Shade EACH 2 2 S250.00 $500.00 $500.00 Trees Sugar Maple (Acer Saccharum) 2" Diameter 24 Concrete Steps S.F. 0 0 $50.00 $0.00 $0.00 25 Adjust Frame Ring EACH 0 0 S100.00 $0.00 $0.00 & Castings Estimated Roadway Cost $28,207.50 $25,930.68 _ Plus 10% Contingency $2,820.75 S2,593.07 Subtotal $31,028.25 $28,523.75 Plus 25% Engr./Admin. $7,757.06 S7,130.94 TOTAL EST. ROADWAY COSTS $38,785.31 $35,654.69 AMOUNT TO BE USED FOR ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS = $35,654.69 7 ESTIMATED ATWOOD STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL 4TH AVE. TO STH AVE. _ LEGAL NUMBER PID # OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT - 27-001433-0 ST. FRANCIS HOSPITTAL W1/2 OF 9 & ALL OF 5 $4,456.84 325 W. 5TH AVE. W1/2 OF BLOCK 57 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY - 27-001434-0 1ST. FRANCIS HOSPITTAL ALL OF BLOCK 58 5 S4,456.84 325 W. 5TH AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 TOTALS = 10 $8,913.67 COST PER LOT= $891.37 8 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FILLMORE STREET 1ST AVENUE TO 4TH AVENUE ROADWAY ITEM CONTRACT I QUANT. QUANT. UNIT TOTALS TOTALS NO. ITEM UNIT 44' WIDE 36' WIDE PRICE 44' WIDE 36' WIDE ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY 1 Clearing EACH 1 1 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 2 Grubbing EACH 2 2 $100.00 $200.00 $200.00 3 Remove Pipe Culvert L.F. 0 0 $5.00 $0.00 $0.00 4 Remove Curb & Gutter L.F. 300 300 $1.50 $450.00 $450.00 5 Remove Sidewalk S.F. 300 300 $0.80 S240.00 $240.00 6 Remove Pavement S.Y. 3700 3027 $1.30 $4,810.00 $3,935.45 7 Remove Conc. Driveway S.F. 400 400 $0.80 $320.00 $320.00 - 8 Remove Catch Basin EACH 0 0 $200.00 $0.00 $0.00 9 Remove Storm Manhole EACH 1 0 0 $250.00 $0.00 $0.00 10 Common Excavation P C.Y. 1300 1064 $3.00 $3,900.00 $3,190.91 - 11 Subgrade Excavation C.Y. 100 100 S3.50 $350.00 $350.00 12 Aggregate Base Class 5 TON 1300 1064 $6.25 $8,125.00 $6,647.73 (100% Crushed) (6") 13 2331 Base Course (1 1/2") TON 300 245 $20.00 $6,000.00 $4,909.09 14 2341 Wearing Course TON 300 245 $22.00 $6,600.00 $5,400.00 (1 1/2" Modified) 15 2341 Bit. Mixture for TON 50 50 $40.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Patching 16 Concrete Curb & Gutter L.F. 1600 1600 $5.00 S8,000.00 $8,000.00 Design B-618 17 4" Concrete Walk S.F. 200 200 $1.50 $300.00 $300.00 - 9 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FILLMORE STREET 1ST AVENUE TO 4TH AVENUE ROADWAY ITEM ' CONTRACT QUANT. QUANT. i UNIT TOTALS TOTALS NO. ITEM UNIT 44' WIDE 36' WIDE PRICE 44' WIDE 36' WIDE ROADWAY ROADWAY I ROADWAY ROADWAY 18 6" Concrete Driveway S.F. 100 100 $2.00 $200.00 $200.00 Pavement 19 8" Concrete Driveway S.F. 400 400 $2.50 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Pavement 20 Sodding S.Y. 1800 1800 $1.75 $3,150.00 $3,150.00 21 Relocate Exist. Tree EACH 0 0 $200.00 $0.00 $0.00 Max. (6") Diameter 22 Furnish & Plant Shade EACH 3 3 $250.00 $750.00 $750.00 Trees, Green Ash (Frax. Pennsylvania) Marshall Seedless 2" Diameter 23 Furnish & Plant Shade EACH 3 3 $250.00 $750.00 $750.00 Trees Sugar Maple (Acer Saccharum) 2" Diameter 24 Concrete Steps S.F. 0 0 $50.00 $0.00 $0.00 25 Adjust Frame Ring EACH 2 2 $100.00 $200.00 $200.00 & Castings — Estimated Roadway Cost $47,445.00 $42,093.18 — Plus 10% Contingency $4,744.50 $4,209.32 Subtotal S52,189.50 546,302.50 Plus 25% Engr./Admin. $13,047.38 $11,575.63 TOTAL EST. ROADWAY COSTS $65,236.88 $57,878.13 AMOUNT TO BE USED FOR ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS = $57,878.13 10 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FILLMORE STREET 1ST AVENUE TO 4TH AVENUE SANITARY SEWER ITEM CONTRACT UNIT NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE TOTALS i 1 Install 4" Outlet Wye EACH 2 S50.00 $100.00 2 Install 6" Outlet Wye EACH 0 $75.00 $0.00 3 Install Connection to EACH 2 $100.00 $200.00 Exist. Service Line (4" or 6") _ 4 8" Pipe Sewer, 0-8 L.F. 130 $15.00 $1,950.00 5 8" Pipe Sewer, 8-10 L.F. 50 $16.00 $800.00 6 8" Pipe Sewer, 10-12 L.F. 50 $17.00 $850.00 _ 7 8" Pipe Sewer, 12-14 L.F. 50 $18.00 $900.00 8 8" Pipe Sewer, 14-16 L.F. 100 $20.00 $2,000.00 9 Construct Manhole, EACH 1 $1,200.00 $1 ,200.00 Shakopee Standard with _, Castings Estimated Sanitary Sewer Cost $8,000.00 Plus 10% Contingency S800.00 Subtotal S8,800.00 Plus 25% Engr./Admin. S2,200.00 TOTAL EST. SANITARY SEWER COSTS $11,000.00 11 ESTIMATED FILLMORE STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL 1ST AVE. TO 4TH AVE. (EXCEPT 1/2 BLOCK SOUTH OF 2ND AVE.) - LEGAL NUMBER PID # OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT 27-001202-0 LAURA BJORKLUND W 50' OF LOT 3 0.50 $227.01 419 E. 2ND AVENUE BLK. 26 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001203-0 VIRGINIA GOEMER E 10' OF 3 & ALL 1.00 $454.02 - 603 S. SPENCER ST. OF 4, BLK. 26 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001204-0 FRANCIS & SHIRLEY KROYER LOT 5, BLK. 26 1.00 $454.02 - 134 S. FILLMORE ST. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 27-001205-0 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORE, INC. LOTS 6-7 & 8 2.50 $1,135.04 - P.O. BOX 1224 BLK. 26 BLOOMIONGTON, MN 55440 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001210-0 JOHN & GWENDOLYN HENNEN LOT 3, BLK. 27 0.50 $227.01 - 421 E. 3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 27-001211-0 DALE DUFF LOT 4, BLK. 27 1.00 S454.02 - 429 W. 3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 27-001212-0 SEC OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVEL LOT 5, BLK. 27 1.00 S454.02 - 220 S. 2ND ST. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 .27-001378-0 COLE & RUTH VANHORN LOTS 3 &4 1.50 $681.03 - 437 E. 4TH AVE. BLK. 52 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001379-0 STANLEY & ARLEN STEJSKAL LOT 5 - 7440 SQ. 0.87 $395.00 - 326 FILLMORE ST. FT. IN N OF RR SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 BLK. 52 SHAKOPEE CITY - 27-001380-0 HELMER & NANCY HALVERSON LOT 6, BLK. 52 1.00 $454.02 13624 SPRING LAKE RD. SHAKOPEE CITY MINNETONKA, MN 55345 - 27-001381-0 ROHN & KAREN PRECHT LOT 7, BLK. 52 1.00 $454.02 430 E. 3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 - 27-001382-0 CHARLES &VICTORIA EVERETT LOT 8, BLK. 52 0.50 $227.01 424 E. 3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 - 27-001824-0 FLORIAN & DONNA DRESSEN LOT 1 , BLK. 166 1.00 $454.02 337 S. FILLMORE SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 - 27-001825-0 ELSIE STEMMER SLOT 2 &W 40' OF 1.80 S817.23 515 E. 4TH AVE. 13, BLK. 166 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 12 ESTIMATED FILLMORE STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL 1ST AVE. TO 4TH AVE. (EXCEPT 1/2 BLOCK SOUTH OF 2ND AVE.) - LEGAL I NUMBER PID # OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT 27-001826-0 ROGER & LORI HENSEN E 10' OF 3, ALL 1.80 $817.23 - 523 E. AVE. OF4 &W30' OF5 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 BLK. 166 SHAKOPEE CITY - 27-001827-0 TODD & LYNN ANDERSON E 20' OF 5 &W 50' 1.20 $544.82 537 E. 4TH AVE. OF 6, BLK. 166 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY - 27-001828-0 EVELYN LEHMAN E 10' OF 6 & ALL 0.70 $317.81 545 E. 4TH AVE. OF 7, BLK. 166 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY - 27-001829-0 !BERNICE LEBENS LOT 8, BLK. 166 0.50 $227.01 548 E. 3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 - 27-001830-0 JEROME WAGNER &WIFE LOT 9, BLK. 166 1.00 $454.02 538 E. 3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 - I27-001831-0 DAVID &WANDA MAKIS ILOT 10, BLK. 166 1.00 $454.02 520 E. 3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 - 127-001832-0 EUGENE NETZBANDT &WIFE LOT 11-12, 2.00 $908.03 518 E. 3RD AVE. BLK. 166 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 1.00 $454.02 - 27-001833-0 JAMES & MARY MEISINGER LOT 13, BLK. 166 506 E. 3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 - 27-001834-0 DELILAH BOLZ LOT 1, BLK. 167 1.00 $454.02 503 E. 3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 - 27-001835-0 THOMAS MONNENS LOT 2, BLK. 167 1.00 $454.02 511 E. 3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 - 27-001836-0 EDWARD &WENDY FONNIER LOT 3, BLK. 167 0.50 $227.01 519 E. 3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 - 27-001846-0 WHOLE ENERGY & HARDWARE LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 2.50 $1,135.04 1620 AUDUBON RD. &5, BLK. 168 CHASKA, MN 55318 SHAKOPEE CITY - 27-001849-0 GEORGIA HALLORAN LOT 8, BLK. 168 0.50 $227.01 522 E. 1ST AVE. EX ROAD SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY _. 27-001850-0 THOMAS DEDEKER SLOT 9, BLK. 168 1.00 $454.02 815 S. SPENCER ST. EX ROAD ,SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 ,SHAKOPEE CITY 13 _ ._ - n ESTIMATED FILLMORE STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL 1ST AVE. TO 4TH AVE. (EXCEPT 1/2 BLOCK SOUTH OF 2ND AVE.) LEGAL NUMBER PID # OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT 27-001851-0 FRANCIS &SHIRLEY KROYER LOT 10, BLK. 168 1.00 $454.02 134 S. FILLMORE ST. EX ROAD SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY TOTALS= 31.87 $14,469.53 COST PER LOT= $454.02 14 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE NAUMKEAG STREET 2ND AVENUE TO 4TH AVENUE ROADWAY ITEM CONTRACT ' QUANT. QUANT. UNIT TOTALS TOTALS NO. ITEM UNIT 44' WIDE 36' WIDE PRICE 44' WIDE 36' WIDE ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY 1 Clearing EACH 1 1 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 2 Grubbing EACH 1 1 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 3 Remove Pipe Culvert L.F. 0 0 $5.00 $0.00 $0.00 4 Remove Curb & Gutter L.F. 100 100 $1.50 $150.00 $150.00 5 Remove Sidewalk S.F. 0 0 $0.80 $0.00 $0.00 6 Remove Pavement S.Y. 2450 2450 $1.30 $3,185.00 $3,185.00 7 Remove Conc. Driveway S.F. 0 0 $0.80 $0.00 $0.00 - 8 Remove Catch Basin EACH 0 0 $200.00 $0.00 50.00 1 9 Remove Storm Manhole EACH 0 0 $250.00 $0.00 $0.00 10 Common Excavation P C.Y. 1200 982 $3.00 $3,600.00 $2,945.45 - 11 Subgrade Excavation C.Y. 50 50 $3.50 $175.00 $175.00 12 Aggregate Base Class 5 TON 1100 900 $6.25 $6,875.00 $5,625.00 (100% Crushed) (6") 13 2331 Base Course (1 1/2") TON 270 221 $20.00 $5,400.00 $4,418.18 _ 14 2341 Wearing Course TON 270 221 $22.00 $5,940.00 $4,860.00 (1 1/2" Modified) _ 15 2341 Bit. Mixture for TON 40 40 $40.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 Patching 16 Concrete Curb & Gutter L.F. 1200 1200 $5.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Design B-618 17 4" Concrete Walk S.F. 50 50 $1.50 $75.00 $75.00 - 15 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE NAUMKEAG STREET 2ND AVENUE TO 4TH AVENUE ROADWAY ITEM CONTRACT QUANT. QUANT. UNIT I TOTALS TOTALS NO. ITEM UNIT 44' WIDE 36' WIDE PRICE 44' WIDE 36' WIDE ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY 18 6" Concrete Driveway S.F. 0 0 $2.00 $0.00 $0.00 Pavement 19 8" Concrete Driveway S.F. 0 0 $2.50 $0.00 $0.00 Pavement 20 Sodding S.Y. 1600 1600 $1.75 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 21 Relocate Exist. Tree EACH 0 0 S200.00 $0.00 $0.00 Max. (6") Diameter 22 Furnish & Plant Shade EACH 2 2 $250.00 $500.00 $500.00 Trees, Green Ash (Frax. Pennsylvania) Marshall Seedless 2" Diameter 23 Furnish & Plant Shade EACH 2 2 $250.00 $500.00 $500.00 Trees Sugar Maple (Acer Saccharum) 2" Diameter 24 Concrete Steps S.F. 0 0 $50.00 $0.00 $0.00 — 25 Adjust Frame Ring EACH 2 2 $100.00 $200.00 $200.00 & Castings Estimated Roadway Cost $37,200.00 $33,233.64 — Plus 10% Contingency $3,720.00 $3,323.36 Subtotal $40,920.00 $36,557.00 Plus 25% Engr./Admin. $10,230.00 $9,139.25 — TOTAL EST. ROADWAY COSTS $51,150.00 $45,696.25 AMOUNT TO BE USED FOR ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS = $45,696.25 16 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE NAUMKEAG STREET 2ND AVENUE TO 4TH AVENUE SANITARY SEWER ITEM CONTRACT I UNIT NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE TOTALS 1 Install 4" Outlet Wye EACH I 6 $50.00 $300.00 2 Install 6" Outlet Wye EACH 1 $75.00 $75.00 3 Install Connection to EACH 7 $100.00 $700.00 — Exist. Service Line (4" or 6") _ 4 8" Pipe Sewer, 0-8 L.F. 40 $15.00 $600.00 5 12" Pipe Sewer, 0-8 L.F. 750 $25.00 $18,750.00 6 Construct Manhole, EACH 1 $1,200.00 $1 ,200.00 Shakopee Standard with — Castings Estimated Sanitary Sewer Cost $21,625.00 _ Plus 10% Contingency $2,162.50 Subtotal $23,787.50 Plus 25% Engr./Admin. 55,946.88 TOTAL EST. SANITARY SEWER COSTS $29,734.38 — 17 ESTIMATED NAUMKEAG STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL 2ND AVE. TO 4TH AVE. LEGAL NUMBER PID # OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT 27-004128-0 THOMAS MARSCHALL LOT 3, BLK. 26 0.50 $300.63 1019 E. 3RD AVE. EAST SHAKOPEE _ SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 27-004129-0 DELPHINE GOOD LOT 4, BLK. 26 1.00 $601.27 1025 E. 3RD AVE. EAST SHAKOPEE _ SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 27-004130-0 BARBARA DELLWO LOT 5, BLK. 26 1.00 $601.27 234 NAUMKEAG ST. EAST SHAKOPEE SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 27-004131-0 ROBERT SHAW, JR. LOT 6,7 & E 1/2 OF 2.50 S1,503.17 8204 NICOLLET S. 8, BLK. 26 MPLS., MN 55420 EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004135-0 DALE & LEANN MEYER LOT 4, BLK. 27 & 1.00 $601.27 1019 E. 4TH AVE. P/O VACATED ALLEY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004136-0 RICHARD SCHNEIDER LOT 5, BLK. 27 & 1.00 $601.27 336 S. NAUMKEAG ST. P/O VACATED ALLEY _ SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004139-0 PATRICK ADAMS LOTS 1-5, BLK. 28 2.50 $1 ,503.17 0/0 SUNDANCE CLINIC & N 1/2 VAC 4TH AV _ 4TH & NAUMKEAG W OF BLK. 35 & E SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 OF NAUMKEAG & P/O VAC SHAWMUT ST EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004142-0 ROGER & LINDA BOECKMAN LOT 8, BLK. 28 0.50 $300.63 1118 E. 3RD AVE. DOC145864 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004143-0 ROGER & BARBARA MONNENS LOT 9, BLK. 28 1.00 $601.27 1110 E. 3RD AVE. DOC149796 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004144-0 DARRELL SWARTWOOD &WIFE LOT 10, BLK. 28 1.00 $601.27 1118 E. 3RD AVE. EAST SHAKOPEE SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 27-004145-0 BUDLERGAN ENTERPRISES LOTS 1 & 2, 2.00 $1,202.53 3936 NATCHEZ AVE. SO. BLK. 29 MPLS., MN 55416 EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004146-0 LINDA FOSS LOT 3 0.50 S300.63 1115 E. 3RD AVE. BLK. 29 _ SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004151-0 LUVERNE ANDERSON &WIFE S 1/2 OF LOTS 9 1.00 S601.27 217 NAUMKEAG ST. & 10, BLK. 29 - SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 EAST SHAKOPEE 27-004152-0 GARY & MARY INDREHUS LOT 8, BLK. 29 0.50 S300.63 1743 PRESIDENTIAL LANE (EAST SHAKOPEE SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 18 ESTIMATED NA UMKEAG STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL 2ND AVE. TO 4TH AVE. LEGAL NUMBER 1 PID # OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT 27-004152-1 DAVID MCGOVERN N 1/2 OF LOTS 9 1.00 $601.27 205 S. NAUMKEAG & 10, BLK. 29 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 EAST SHAKOPEE _ 27-101001-0 GWENDOLYN HAMMERS LOT 1, BLK. 1' 0.50 $271.38 300 S. NAUMKEAG ST. LINK'S 2ND ADDN SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 27-101002-0 ARDEN & BARBARA KVAM LOT 2, BLK. 1' 0.50 $271.38 308 NAUMKEAG ST. LINK'S 2ND ADDN SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 27-101003-0 JURI SOKOLOV LOT 3, BLK. 1*** 0.50 5271.38 316 NAUMKEAG ST. LINK'S 2ND ADDN I SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 27-101004-0 DOROTHY WEED LOT 4, BLK. 1'"" 0.50 $271.38 - 324 NAUMKEAG ST. LINK'S 2ND ADDN SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 - TOTALS = 19.00 $11,307.06 COST PER LOT= $601.27 ' THIS PROPERTY CREDITED FOR EXISTING CURB &GUTTER LESS THAN 20 YEARS OLD 19 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 4TH AVENUE FILLMORE ST. TO NAUMKEAG ST. ROADWAY ITEM CONTRACT QUANT. QUANT. UNIT TOTALS TOTALS NO. ITEM UNIT 44' WIDE 36' WIDE PRICE 44' WIDE 36' WIDE ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY 1 Clearing EACH 6 6 S100.00 $600.00 $600.00 2 Grubbing EACH 10 10 $100.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 3 Remove Pipe Culvert L.F. 0 0 $5.00 $0.00 $0.00 4 Remove Curb & Gutter L.F. 4400 4400 $1.50 $6,600.00 $6,600.00 5 Remove Sidewalk S.F. 5000 5000 $0.80 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 6 Remove Pavement S.Y. 10000 8182 $1.30 $13,000.00 $10,636.36 7 Remove Conc. Driveway S.F. 2200 2200 $0.80 $1,760.00 $1,760.00 — 8 Remove Catch Basin EACH 0 0 $200.00 $0.00 S0.00 9 Remove Storm Manhole EACH 0 0 $250.00 S0.00 $0.00 10 Common Excavation P C.Y. 3800 2332 $3.00 $11,400.00 $6,995.45 11 Subgrade Excavation C.Y. 200 200 $3.50 $700.00 S700.00 12 Aggregate Base Class 5 TON 4800 2945 $6.25 $30,000.00 $18,409.09 (100% Crushed) (8") 13 2331 Base Course (2") TON 1150 706 $20.00 $23,000.00 $14,113.64 _ 14 2341 Wearing Course TON 1150 706 $22.00 $25,300.00 $15,525.00 (2" Modified) _ 15 2341 Bit. Mixture for TON 100 100 $40.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Patching _ 16 Concrete Curb & Gutter L.F. 4400 4400 $5.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 Design B-618 17 4" Concrete Walk S.F. 20700 1 20700 $1.50 , $31,050.00 $31,050.00 — 20 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 4TH AVENUE FILLMORE ST. TO NAUMKEAG ST. ROADWAY ITEM CONTRACT QUANT. QUANT. UNIT TOTALS TOTALS NO. ITEM UNIT 44' WIDE 36' WIDE PRICE 44' WIDE 36' WIDE ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY 18 6" Concrete Driveway S.F. 3300 3300 $2.00 $6,600.00 $6,600.00 Pavement 19 8" Concrete Driveway S.F. 450 450 $2.50 $1,125.00 $1,125.00 Pavement 20 Sodding S.Y. 7500 7500 $1.75 $13,125.00 $13,125.00 21 Relocate Exist. Tree EACH 3 3 $200.00 $600.00 $600.00 Max. (6") Diameter 22 Furnish & Plant Shade EACH 10 10 $250.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Trees, Green Ash (Frax. Pennsylvania) Marshall Seedless 2" Diameter 23 Furnish & Plant Shade EACH 10 10 $250.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Trees Sugar Maple (Acer Saccharum) 2" Diameter 24 Concrete Steps S.F. 100 100 $50.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 25 Adjust Frame Ring EACH 6 6 $100.00 $600.00 $600.00 &Castings Estimated Roadway Cost $206,460.00 $169,439.55 Plus 10% Contingency $20,646.00 $16,943.95 Subtotal $227,106.00 $186,383.50 Plus 25% Engr./Admin. $56,776.50 $46,595.88 TOTAL EST. ROADWAY COSTS $283,882.50 $232,979.38 AMOUNT TO BE USED FOR ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS= $232,979.38 21 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 4TH AVENUE FILLMORE STREET TO NAUMKEAG STREET SANITARY SEWER — ITEM CONTRACT UNIT NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE TOTALS 1 Install 4" Outlet Wye EACH 40 $50.00 $2,000.00 -- 2 Install 6" Outlet Wye EACH 6 S75.00 $450.00 3 Install Connection to EACH 46 $100.00 $4,600.00 — Exist. Service Line ;(4" or 6") — 4 8" Pipe Sewer, 0-8 L.F. 2000 $15.00 $30,000.00 5 8" Pipe Sewer, 8-10 L.F. 200 $16.00 $3,200.00 6 Construct Manhole, EACH 5 $1,200.00 $6,000.00 Shakopee Standard with — Castings 7 Construct Additional L.F. 5 $100.00 $500.00 — Depth in Manhole 8 Remove Manhole EACH 5 $200.00 $1,000.00 Estimated Sanitary Sewer Cost $47,750.00 — Plus 10% Contingency $4,775.00 Subtotal $52,525.00 Plus 25% Engr./Admin. $13,131.25 TOTAL EST. SANITARY SEWER COSTS $65,656.25 — 22 ESTIMATED 4TH AVENUE ASSESSMENT ROLL — FRONT PID # OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOT ASSESSMENT 27-0001824-0 Florian L. & Donna Dressen Lot 1 Block 166 60.00 $928.72 — 337 S. Fillmore St. Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-001825-0 Elsie B. Stemmer Lot 2 &W. 40' of Lot 3 100.00 $1,547.87 — 515 E. 4th Avenue Block 166 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 27-001826-0 Roger T& Lori J Hensen E. 10' of 3, All of 4 & 80.00 $1,238.29 — 523 E. 4th Avenue W. 30' of 5 Block 166 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 27-001827-0 Todd A & Lynn M Anderson E. 20' of 5 &W. 50' of 6 70.00 $1,083.51 — 537 E. 4th Avenue Block 166 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 27-001828-0 Evelyn R Lehman E. 10' of 6 &All of 7 70.00 $1,083.51 — 545 E. 4th Avenue Block 166 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 27-004024-0 James R &Alice Pfleghaar Lot 1 Block 4 60.00 $928.72 — 603 E. 4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-004025-0 Darlene M Smith Lot 2 Block 4 60.00 $928.72 — 613 E. 4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-004026-0 Alan A Marschall Lot 3 Block 4 60.00 $928.72 — 619 E. 4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-004027-0 Wade A & Dee J Scherer Lot 4 Block 4 60.00 $928.72 — 314 E. 2nd Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-004028-0 Robert A&Kimberly Kessler Lot 5 Block 4 60.00 $928.72 — 637 E 4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-004034-0 Joe G & Paulette Meuffels W. 1/2 Lots 1 &2 71.00 $1,098.99 — 329 Market Street S. Block 5 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-004035-0 Esther M Marrinan E. 71' of Lots 1 &2 71.00 $1,098.99 — 713 E. 4th Avenue Block 5 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-004039-0 John A Roepke &Wife Lot 6 &W. 25' of 7 85.00 $1,315.69 — 725 E. 4th Avenue Block 5 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-004040-0 Bernard Goehring &Wife Lot 8 & E. 25' of 7 85.00 $1,315.69 735 E. 4th Avenue Block 5 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 23 ESTIMATED 4TH AVENUE ASSESSMENT ROLL FRONT PID # OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOT ASSESSMENT 27-004072-0 Fred J Kaley &Wife Lot 1 &W. 1/2 of 2 90.00 $1,393.08 805 E. 4th Avenue Block 12 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-004073-0 Kevin T Hennes E. 1/2 of 2 &All of 3 90.00 $1,393.08 815 E. 4th Avenue Block 12 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-004074-0 Darren L & Kari N Isenberg Lot 5 Block 12 60.00 $928.72 835 E. 4th avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-004074-1 Peter L Deutsch Lot 4 Block 12 60.00 $928.72 827 E. 4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-004080-0 Scott D & Susan M Marker Lot 1 Ex. N. 8' for Alley 60.00 $928.72 903 E. 4th Avenue Block 13 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-004081-0 Steven D & Francis Haeg Lot 2 Block 13 60.00 $928.72 913 E. 4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-004082-0 Donald C Anderson &Wife Lot 3 Block 13 60.00 S928.72 921 E. 4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-004083-0 Jerome L Schmidt &Wife Lot 4 Block 13 60.00 $928.72 927 E. 4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-004084-0 Alfred Pudil Lot 5 Block 13 60.00 $928.72 -- 937 E. 4th Avenue East Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-004134-0 Scott L Theis Lot 3 & P/O Vacated Alley 60.00 $928.72 1017 E. 4th Avenue Block 27 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-004135-0 Dale R & Leann E Meyer Lot 4 & P/O Vacated Alley 60.00 $928.72 1019 E. 4th Avenue Block 27 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-004136-0 Richard J Schneider Lot 5 & P/O Vacated Alley 60.00 $928.72 336 S. Naumkeag Block 27 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 East Shakopee Plat 27-005001-0 Jerome J & Verna C Rein Lot 7 & E 10' of 8 60.00 $928.72 638 E. 4th Avenue Block 208 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Leremondis Addn. 27-005002-0 David J & Deborah A Rutt Lots 4 to 9 Ex. Lot 7 & 90.00 $1,393.08 630 E. 4th Avenue E 10' of 8 Block 208 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Leremondis Addn. 24 ESTIMATED 4TH AVENUE ASSESSMENT ROLL FRONT PID # OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOT ASSESSMENT 27-005003-0 Thomas F&Cathy J Odenthal Lot 10 & E 30' of 11 80.00 $1,238.29 618 E. 4th Avenue Block 208 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Leremondis Addn. 27-005004-0 Paul R & Lisa Gehrke W 20' of 11 & E 15' of 12 35.00 $541.75 -- 612 E. 4th Avenue Block 208 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Leremondis Addn. 27-005005-0 Michael J &Judith M Gappa Lot 12 Ex. E 15' 35.00 $541.75 604 E. 4th Avenue Block 208 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Leremondis Addn. 27-005007-0 State of Minnesota E 7' of N 130' of Lot 9 7.00 $108.35 C/O Scott County Auditor Block 209 428 S. Holmes St. Leremondis Addn. Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-005008-0 Gary A &Janice M Steffi N 130' of w 50' of Lot 9 62.50 $967.42 724 E. 4th Avenue & E 12 1/2' of N 130' Shakopee, Mn. 55379 of 10 Block 209 Leremondis Addn. 27-005009-0 John J & Rose I Mertz N 130' of 10 Ex. E. 12 1/2' 62.50 $967.42 714 E 4th Avenue & E 25' of N 130' of 11 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Block 209 Leremondis Addn. 27-005010-0 Donald R Plekkonpol N 130' of 12 & N 130' of W 75.00 $1,160.90 706 E. 4th Avenue 25' of 11 Block 209 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Leremondis Addn. 27-097001-0 Nancy Nguyen Lot 1 Block 1 59.85 $926.40 407 Minnesota Street Macey 2nd Addition Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-097013-0 Timothy J & Romaine T Meek Lot 1 Block 3 92.96 $1,438.90 406 Minnesota Street Macey 2nd Addition Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-106001-0 David M & Michelle Towers Lot 1 Block 1 41.50 $642.36 1001 E. 4th Avenue Links 3rd Addition Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-106002-0 Andrew Bruns Lot 2 Block 1 41.50 $642.36 1003 E. 4th Avenue Links 3rd Addition Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-106003-0 Ethel F Anderson Lot 3 Block 1 41.50 $642.36 1009 E. 4th Avenue Links 3rd Addition Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-106004-0 Mabel M Jorgenson Lot 4 Block 1 41.50 $642.36 1011 E. 4th Avenue Links 3rd Addition Shakopee, Mn. 55379 25 ESTIMATED 4TH AVENUE ASSESSMENT ROLL FRONT PID # OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOT ASSESSMENT 27-906035-0 City of Shakopee 11.52 A. in N1/2 of SW1/4 178.12 S2,757.06 129 S. Holmes Street & all of vacated RR Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906039-0 Lyle A & Corby Jo Bakken P/O NE1/4,SW1/4 Com. 668.3' 60.00 $928.72 4376 Hickory Hills Trail SW of NE Cor SW 20.32' to Prior Lake, Mn. 55372 BP 144.3' SW 45.75' N to PT 60' SW of beg. NE 60' to beg. & parcel S of above N of Macey Plat Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906040-0 Clyde D & Debby L Harrison DOC147938 P/O NE1/4, SW1/4 60.86 S942.03 938 E. 4th Avenue Corn 668.3' SW of NE Cor, SW Shakopee, Mn. 55379 22.32', 144.3', SW 149.61', N 30' to P-O-B, NE 60.86', N 112', SW 60.86', S112' to Beg. Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906041-0 Alfred R & Marie V Gamauf P/O NE1/4 SW1/4 Corn 668.3' 55.22 $854.73 1004 E. 4th Avenue SW of NE Cor, SW 20.32', SE Shakopee, Mn. 55379 144.3', SW 45.75' to POB, Sw 43', N 142', NE 55.22', S to POB & Parcel Lying Between S Boundary of Above & N Boundary of Macey Plat, Between S Ext of E &W Boundaries of Above Parcel. Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906058-0 Douglas E & Carol J Snell P/O NE1/4 SW1/4 Beg. Extens 60.00 S928.72 906 E. 4th Avenue S Line 4th & E Line of S Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Ext Dakota St., S 142', E 60', N 142', W 60' to Beg Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906059-0 Joseph W & Myrtle Ruetten P/O NE1/4 SW1/4 Beg 60' E 60.00 S928.72 914 E. 4th Avenue of Intersect E Line S Ext Shakopee, Mn. 55379 of Dakota St. & S Line 4th, S 142', E 60', N142', W 60' to Beg. Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906118-0 Richard R Allison & Wife 60' x 142' in NE1/4 SW1/4 60.00 S928.72 926 E 4th Avenue & 10.55' x 60 x 8.78' x 60' Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Adj. Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906119-0 William G Scheurer Jr P/O NE1/4 SW1/4 Beg S Line 60.00 $928.72 922 E 4th Ave. 4th St 120' E of Dakota St Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Inters, S 142', E 60', N 142', W 60' to Beg ;Sect 6 T115 R22 26 ESTIMA 1 ED 4TH AVENUE ASSESSMENT ROLL FRONT PD # OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOT ASSESSMENT 27-906120-0 City of Shakopee P/O NE1/4 SW1/4 Corn S Line 49.80 $770.84 — 129 S Holmes Street of 4th St 657.1' SW of NE Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Cor , S 208', E 49', N 216.9', W 49.8' to POB. Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906128-0 Mathias Mather P/O NW1/4 SW1/4 Beg 117' E of 160.00 $2,476.59 502 E. 4th Avenue Range Line, S 205.5', E160', - Shakopee, Mn. 55379 N 205.5', W 160' Ex .17 Ac Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906129-0 Lawrence H &Viola Boeckman P/O NW1/4 SW1/4 Beg 121' W of 60.00 $928.72 530 E. 4th Avenue NW Cor Blk 208, Leremondis Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Addn W 60',S125.5', E 60', N125.5' to Beg Ex RR ROW Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906130-0 Michael J & Judith M Gappa P/O NW1/4 SW1/4 Beg 10.1' W 10.10 $156.33 604 E. 4th Avenue of NW Cor Blk 208, S 130', E Shakopee, Mn. 55379 10.1', N 130', W 10.1' to Beg Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906131-0 Dean R Woodbridge &Wife P/O NW1/4 SW1/4 Beg 10.1' W 51.00 $789.41 548 E. 4th Avenue of NW Cor Blk 208, W 51', S Shakopee, Mn. 55379 130', E 51', N 130' to Beg Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906136-0 Merrill E Mobley &Wife P/O NE1/2 SW1/4 Beg Inters 120.00 $1,857.44 838 E. 4th Avenue S Line of 4th &W Line of Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Dakota S 142', W 120', N 142', E to Beg. Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906137-0 Lance J Hespenheide P/O NE1/2 SW1/4 Beg. 120' W ( 60.00 $928.72 820 E. 4th Avenue of Intersect 4th & Dakota, Shakopee, Mn. 55379 W 60', S 142', E 60', N to Beg. Sect 6 T115 R22 27-906146-0 Mildred Unze P/O NW1/4 SW1/4 Beg. 60' E 60.00 $928.72 810 E. 4th Avenue of E Line Minn St on S Line Shakopee, Mn. 55379 of E 4th, S 142', E 60', N 142', W 60' to Beg. Sect 6 T115 R22 TOTALS = 3762.91 $58,244.85 COST PER FRONT FOOT= $15.48 27 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 8TH AVENUE ATWOOD STREET TO SPENCER STREET _ ROADWAY ITEM CONTRACT QUANT. QUANT. UNIT TOTALS TOTALS NO. ITEM UNIT 44' WIDE 36' WIDE PRICE 44' WIDE 36' WIDEROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY _ 1 Clearing EACH 4 4 $100.00 $400.00 $400.00 2 Grubbing EACH 6 6 $100.00 $600.00 $600.00 3 Remove Pipe Culvert L.F. 0 0 $5.00 $0.00 $0.00 _ 4 Remove Curb &Gutter L.F. 3320 3320 $1.50 $4,980.00 $4,980.00 5 Remove Sidewalk S.F. 6000 6000 $0.80 $4,800.00 $4,800.00 6 Remove Pavement S.Y. 8000 6545 $1.30 $10,400.00 $8,509.09 - 7 Remove Conc. Driveway S.F. 3360 3360 $0.80 $2,688.00 S2,688.00 8 Remove Catch Basin EACH 0 0 $200.00 S0.00 $0.00 _ 9 Remove Storm Manhole EACH 0 0 S250.00 $0.00 $0.00 _ 10 Common Excavation P C.Y. 3000 2455 S3.00 $9,000.00 $7,363.64 11 Subgrade Excavation C.Y. 200 200 S3.50 $700.00 $700.00 12 Aggregate Base Class 5 TON 2700 2209 $6.25 $16,875.00 $13,806.82 (100% Crushed) (6") 13 2331 Base Course (1 1/2") TON 650 532 $20.00 $13,000.00 $10,636.36 14 2341 Wearing Course TON 650 532 $22.00 $14,300.00 $11,700.00 (1 1/2" Modified) 15 2341 Bit. Mixture for TON 100 100 $40.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Patching 16 Concrete Curb & Gutter L.F. 3320 3320 $5.00 $16,600.00 $16,600.00 Design B-618 17 4" Concrete Walk S.F. 1800 1800 $1.50 1 $2,700.00 S2,700.00 28 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 8TH AVENUE ATWOOD STREET TO SPENCER STREET ROADWAY ITEM CONTRACT QUANT. QUANT. UNIT TOTALS TOTALS NO. ITEM UNIT 44' WIDE 36' WIDE PRICE 44' WIDE 36' WIDEROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY 18 6" Concrete Driveway S.F. 3000 3000 $2.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Pavement 19 8" Concrete Driveway S.F. 200 200 $2.50 $500.00 $500.00 Pavement 20 Sodding S.Y. 6650 6650 $1.75 $11,637.50 $11,637.50 21 Relocate Exist. Tree EACH 2 2 $200.00 $400.00 5400.00 Max. (6") Diameter 22 Furnish & Plant Shade EACH 5 5 $250.00 S1,250.00 $1,250.00 Trees, Green Ash (Frax. Pennsylvania) Marshall Seedless 2" Diameter 23 Furnish & Plant Shade EACH 5 5 $250.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 Trees Sugar Maple (Acer Saccharum) 2" Diameter — 24 Concrete Steps S.F. 30 30 $50.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 25 Adjust Frame Ring EACH 0 0 $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 & Castings Estimated Roadway Cost $123,580.50 5112,021.41 Plus 10% Contingency $12,358.05 $11,202.14 — Subtotal $135,938.55 S123,223.55 Plus 25% Engr./Admin. $33,984.64 $30,805.89 TOTAL EST. ROADWAY COSTS $169,923.19 $154,029.44 AMOUNT TO BE USED FOR ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS = $154,029.44 29 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 8TH AVENUE ATWOOD STREET TO SPENCER STREET SANITARY SEWER ITEM I CONTRACT UNIT NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE TOTALS 1 Install 4" Outlet Wye EACH 17 $50.00 $850.00 2 Install 6" Outlet Wye EACH 1 $75.00 $75.00 3 Install Connection to EACH 18 $100.00 $1,800.00 Exist. Service Line (4" or 6") 4 8" Pipe Sewer, 0-8 L.F. 980 $15.00 $14,700.00 5 Construct Manhole, EACH 5 $1 ,200.00 S6,000.00 Shakopee Standard with Castings Estimated Sanitary Sewer Cost $23,425.00 Plus 10% Contingency $2,342.50 Subtotal S25,767.50 Plus 25% Engr./Admin. $6,441.88 TOTAL EST. SANITARY SEWER COSTS $32,209.38 30 ESTIMATED 8TH AVENUE ASSESSMENT ROLL ATWOOD STREET TO SPENCER STREET LEGAL FRONT PID # OWNER DESCRIPTION FOOT ASSESSMENT 1 & 2 120.00 $911.34 S 71' of Lots 27-001723-0 Harriet M Pink USE 71' 735 Atwood Street Block 98 _ Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS. 27-001725-0 James W Kralik Lot 3 Block 98 60.00 $770.15 223 W. 8th Avenue Shakopee Plat — Shakopee, Mn. 55379 60.00 $770.15 27-001726-0 Norman R &Anita A Stevens Lot 4 Block 98 213 W. 8th Avenue Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 60.00 $770.15 27-001727-0 St. Johns Evangelical Luth. Lot 5 Block 98 119 W. 8th Avenue Shakopee Plat _ Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-001733-0 St. Johns Evangelical Luth. Lots 1 & 2 Block 99 120.00 $1,540.29 119 W. 8th Avenue Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-001734-0 St. Johns Evangelical Luth. 'Lots 3-4-5 Block 99 180.00 $2,310.44 119 W. 8th Avenue Shakopee Plat — Shakopee, Mn. 55379 S 1/2 of Lots 1 & 2 120.00 $911.34 27-001741-0 Julie D Bjelland USE 71' 735 S. Holmes Street Block 100 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS. 27-001742-0 Steven Menke Lot 3 Block 100 60.00 $770.15 121 E. 8th Avenue Shakopee Plat — Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-001744-0 Robert H & Sharon L Navarre S 1/2 of Lots 4 & 5 120.00 $455.67 736 S. Lewis Street Block 100 USE 71' — Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS. 27-001751-0 Isabel E Beckrich S 66' of Lots 1 & 2 & 160.00 $423.58 735 S. Lewis Street W 40' of 3 Block 101 USE 66' _ Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS. 27-001752-0 Arthur P & Ardis C Hoen E 20' of 3 & All of 4 80.00 $1,026.86 227 E. 8th Avenue Block 101 _ Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 60.00 I $770.15 27-001753-0 Charles H Lonto Lot 5 Block 101 736 Sommerville Street Shakopee Plat — Shakopee, Mn. 55379 27-001758-0 Stephen R & Lucia A Schmitz S 71' of Lots 1 & 2 120.00 $911.34USE 71' 735 Sommerville Street Block 102 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat ,FOR ASSESS. 27-001760-0 Cynthia Erickson Lot 3 Block 102 i 60.00 $770.15 21482 Park Blvd. Shakopee Plat Jordan, Mn. 55352 I 31 ESTIMATED 8TH AVENUE ASSESSMENT ROLL ATWOOD STREET TO SPENCER STREET FRONT RONT — PID # OWNER DESCRIPTION FOOT ASSESSMENT 27-001761-0 Jack A &Venetta M Anderson S 71' of Lots 4 & 5 120.00 5911.34USE 71' 13550 Townline Avenue Block 102 ASSESS. _ Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR SESESS. 5911.34 27-001782-0 David Lee Thompson N 1/2 of Lots 6 &7 120.00 336 E. 8th Avenue Block 105 USE 71' Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS. — 27-001783-0 Valentine G Pink &Wife E 50' of Lot 8 50.00 $641.79 423 E. 8th Avenue Block 105 _ Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 70.00 $898.51 27-001784-0 Mary Dixon W 10' of 8 & N 82' of 9 314 E. 8th Avenue Block 105 _ Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 27-001786-0 Edward L &Adeline J Dircks Part of Lot 10 60.00 $770.15 807 Sommerville Street Block 105 _ Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 142.00 $962.68 27-001791-0 Gary R &Jean M Deschane N 75' of Lots 6 & 7 & N 804 Sommerville Street 75' of E 22' of Lot 8 USE 75' _ Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Block 106 Ex S 6" Thereof FOR ASSESS. Shakopee Plat 27-001793-0 State of Minnesota E 16' of W 38' Lot 8 16.00 S205.37 _ C/O Scott County Auditor Block 106 428 S. Holmes St. Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 _ 27-001794-0 Robert B Rademacher &Wife N 90' of W 22' of 8 & 142.00 1 $577.61 809 S. Lewis Street N 90' of Lots 9 & 10 USE 90' Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Block 106 FOR ASSESS. — Shakopee Plat 27-001803-0 Ralph L & Barbara L Johnston N 71' of Lots 6 &7 120.00 $455.67USE 71' 804 S. Lewis Street Block 107 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS. 27-001805-0 Steven H &Jane M Clay Lot 8 Block 107 60.00 $770.15 120 E. 8th Avenue Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 10 120.00 $911.34 N 71' of Lots 9 & 27-001806-0 B F Pearson &Wife USE 71' 805 S. Holmes Street Block 107 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS. N 54' of 6 & N 54' of E 100.00 27-001813-0 Daniel Fehring USE 54' $693.13 806 S. Holmes Street 40' of 7 Block 108 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat FOR ASSESS.80.00 S1,026.86 27-001815-0 Melvin H & Donna M Hennen Lot 8 &W 20' of N 100' 120 W. 8th Avenue iof Lot 7 Block 108 !Shakopee, Mn. 55379 ,Shakopee Plat 32 ESTIMATED 8TH A VENUE ASSESSMENT ROLL ATWOOD STREET TO SPENCER STREET FRONT RONT PID # OWNER DESCRIPTION FOOT ASSESSMENT — 27-001816-0 John T Otto & Bartholomew, Lot 9 Block 108 60.00 $770.15 Virgina C. Shakopee Plat _ 130 W. 8th Avenue Shakopee, Mn. 55379 60.00 $770.15 27-001817-0 Linda C Hegreberg Lot 10 Block 108 _ 132 W. 8th Avenue Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 45.00 $577.61 27-001818-0 Patrick M & Annette C Glynn E 45' of Lot 6 Block 109 _ 204 W. 8th Avenue Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 50.00 S641.79 27-001819-0 Brad P Anderson W 15' of 6 & E 35' of 7 _ 210 W. 8th Avenue Block 109 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 55.00 $705.97 27-001820-0 Ervin H & Cathy A Monnens W 25' of 7 & E 30' of 8 — 218 W. 8th Avenue Block 109 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 90.00 $1,155.22 27-001821-0 Leslie A Schultz W 1/2 of 8 & All of 9 228 W. 8th Avenue Block 109 Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Shakopee Plat 60.00 5770.15 127-001822-0 Clair E &Virgina Sheffer Lot 10 Block 109 815 S. Atwood Street Shakopee Plat Shakopee, Mn. 55379 See Also Desc. #14A TOTALS = 3000.00 $28,238.73 COST PER FRONT FOOT= $12.84 33 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE SPENCER STREET 1ST AVENUE TO SHAKOPEE AVENUE ROADWAY ITEM CONTRACT QUANTITY QUANTITY UNIT TOTALS TOTALS NO. ITEM UNIT 44' WIDE 36' WIDE PRICE 44' WIDE 36' WIDE ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY _ 1 Clearing EACH 12 12 $100.00 $1,200.00 S1,200.00 2 Grubbing EACH 18 18 S100.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 3 Remove Pipe Culvert L.F. 100 100 $5.00 $500.00 $500.00 _ 4 Remove Curb & Gutter L.F. 6000 6000 $1.50 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 5 Remove Sidewalk S.F. 9200 9200 $0.80 $7,360.00 $7,360.00 — 6 Remove Pavement S.Y. 13850 11332 $1.30 $18,005.00 $14,731.36 _ 7 Remove Concrete Driveway S.F. 6200 6200 $0.80 $4,960.00 54,960.00 8 Remove Catch Basin EACH 11 11 $200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 — 9 Remove Storm Sewer Manh EACH 1 1 $250.00 $250.00 S250.00 _ 10 Common Excavation P C.Y. 6000 4909 $3.00 $18,000.00 $14,727.27 11 Subgrade Excavation C.Y. 500 500 $3.50 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 12 Aggregate Base Class 5 TON 6000 3682 $6.25 $37,500.00 $23,011.36 (100% Crushed) (8") 13 2331 Base Course (2") TON 1700 1043 S20.00 $34,000.00 $20,863.64 14 2341 Wearing Course TON 1700 1043 $22.00 $37,400.00 $22,950.00 (2" Modified) 15 2341 Bit. Mixture for TON 200 200 $40.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 Patching 16 Concrete Curb & Gutter L.F. 6000 6000 $5.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Design B-618 I 17 4" Concrete Walk S.F. 26800 26800 $1.50 I $40,200.00 $40,200.00 — 34 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE SPENCER STREET 1ST AVENUE TO SHAKOPEE AVENUE ROADWAY ITEM CONTRACT QUANTITY QUANTITY UNIT TOTALS 1 TOTALS NO. ITEM UNIT 44' WIDE 36' WIDE PRICE 44' WIDE 36' WIDE i ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY I 18 6" Concrete Driveway S.F. 6000 6000 $2.00 $12,000.00 S12,000.00 Pavement 19 8" Concrete Driveway S.F. 3300 3300 $2.50 $8,250.00 $8,250.00 Pavement 20 Sodding S.Y. 10000 10000 $1.75 $17,500.00 $17,500.00 21 Relocate Exist. Tree EACH 4 4 $200.00 $800.00 $800.00 Max. (6") Diameter 22 Furnish & Plant Shade EACH 20 20 $250.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 — Trees, Green Ash (Fraxinus Pennsylvania) Marshall Seedless 2" Diameter 23 Furnish & Plant Shade EACH 20 20 $250.00 $5,000.00 S5,000.00 Trees Sugar Maple (Acer Saccharum) 2" Diameter 24 Concrete Steps S.F. 200 200 $50.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 25 Adjust Frame Ring EACH 6 6 S100.00 $600.00 $600.00 & Castings 26 Retaining Wall S.F. 1800 1800 S15.00 $27,000.00 $27,000.00 Estimated Roadway Cost $338,275.00 $289,653.64 Plus 10% Contingency $33,827.50 $28,965.36 Subtotal $372,102.50 $318,619.00 Plus 25% Engr./Admin. $93,025.63 S79,654.75 TOTAL EST. ROADWAY COSTS $465,128.13 $398,273.75 - AMOUNT TO BE USED FOR ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS = $398,273.75 35 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE SPENCER STREET 1ST AVENUE TO SHAKOPEE AVENUE SANITARY SEWER ITEM CONTRACT UNIT NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE TOTALS 1 Install 4" Outlet Wye EACH 15 $50.00 S750.00 2 Install 6" Outlet Wye EACH 5 $75.00 $375.00 3 Install Connection to EACH 20 $100.00 $2,000.00 _ Exist. Service Line (4" or 6") — 4 8" Pipe Sewer, 0-8 L.F. 2000 $15.00 S30,000.00 5 8" Pipe Sewer, 8-10 L.F. 310 $16.00 S4,960.00 6 10" Pipe Sewer, 0-8 L.F. 600 $17.00 $10,200.00 — 7 10" Pipe Sewer, 8-10 L.F. 50 $18.00 $900.00 8 Construct Manhole, EACH 8 $1,200.00 $9,600.00 — Shakopee Standard with Castings 9 Construct Additional L.F. 10 $100.00 $1,000.00 Depth in Manhole 10 Remove Manhole EACH 8 $200.00 $1,600.00 Estimated Sanitary Sewer Cost $61 ,385.00 Plus 10% Contingency $6,138.50 Subtotal $67,523.50 Plus 25% Engr./Admin. $16,880.88 TOTAL EST. SANITARY SEWER COSTS $84,404.38 36 ROLL :STIMATED SPENCER STREET ASSESSMENT FROM 3RD AVE. TO 4TH AVE.) (1ST AVE. TO SHAKOPEE AVE. EXCEPTLEGAL NUMBER -r ID # OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT BART PARTNERS LOT 3, BLK. 25 0.50 S614.62 I 4804 W. 60TH ST. SHAKOPEE CITY EDINA, MN 554241.00 $1 ,229.24 27-001193-0 DAVID &JANE CHASE LOT 4, BLK. 25 228 HWY. 212 E. SHAKOPEE CITY CHASKA, MN 55318 1.00 S1,229.24 27-001194-0 MELVIN & ARLIS WALEN LOT 5, BLK. 25 2401 165TH ST. W. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 1.00 $1,229.24 27-001195-0 'DONALD SPRAGUE LOT 6, BLK. 25 338 E. FIRST AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 1 pp $1,229,24 27-001196-0 DONALD SPRAGUE LOT 7, BLK. 25 338 E. FIRST AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 0.50 5614.62 27-001197-0 JOELLE SAWVEL LOT 8, BLK. 25 320 E. FIRST AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 1.00 S1,229.24 27-001200-0 LOIS BROOS LOT 1, BLK. 26 403 E. 2ND AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 1 pp $1 ,229.24 ;27-001201-0 MERLE NELSON LOT 2, BLK. 26 411 E. 2ND AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 p 50 $614.62 1-27-001202-0 LAURA BJORKLUND W 50' OF LOT 3 419 E. 2ND AVE. BLK. 26 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001205-0 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORE, INC. LOT 8, BLK. 26 0.50 $614.62 P.O. BOX 1224 SHAKOPEE CITY BLOOMINGTON, MN 55440 1.00 S1,229.24 127-001206-0 HARMON HARRISON, JR. LOT 9, BLK. 26 414 1/2 E. 1ST ST. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 1 pp Si 229 24 127-001207-0 R. KATHLEEN MORRIS LOT 10, BLK. 26 2615 SPRING LAKE RD. S.W. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 1 pp $1,229.24 127-001208-0 DAVID & KATHERINE FOSS LOT 1, BLK. 27 403 E. 3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 1 pp $1 ,229.24 127-001209-0 MARVIN & GLORIA GUSTAFSON LOT 2, BLK. 27 413 E. 3RD AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 0.50 S614.62 127-001210-0 JOHN & GWENDOLYN HENNEN LOT 3, BLK. 27 421 E. 3RD SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 37 :STIMATED SPENCER STREET ASSESSMEIFROM 3RD AVE. TO 4TH AVE.) T ROLL (1ST AVE. TO SHAKOPEE AVE. EXCEPT LEGAL NUMBER r'ID # OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT 27-001215-0 RONALD & BETTY OTTO LOT 8, BLK. 27 0.50 $614.62SHAKOPEE CITY 418 E. 2ND AVE. SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 2.00 $2,458.48 27-001216-0 GERALD & MARY KAY FELTMANN LOTS 9 & 10 9509 DAKOTA ROAD BLK. 27 MPLS., MN 55438 SHAKOPEE CITY '27-001220-0 LEROY LISTRUDE &WIFE LOT 3 & W 1/2 1.00 $1 ,229.24 1323 E. 3RD AVE. OF 4, BLK. 28 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY l27-001221-0 LUKE LUND LOT 5 & E 1/2 1.50 S1,843.86 1 337 E. 3RD AVE. OF 4, BLK. 28 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 127-001222-0 STEVEN THOMAS LOT 6, BLK. 28 1.00 $1,229.24 336 2ND AVE. E. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 1.00 $1 ,229.24 127-001223-0 WILLIAM &JANICE VOHNOUTKA LOT 7, BLK. 28 328 2ND AVE. E. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 0.50 $614.62 27-001224-0 (ROBERT & BETTY DRURY LOT 8, BLK. 28 P.O. BOX 193 SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 1 pp $1,229.24 ,27-001385-0 EDWARD SIEBENALER S 1/2 OF LOT 1 & 322 E. 5TH AVE. S 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 2, BLK. 53 SHAKOPEE CITY '7-001386-0 EDWARD SIEBENALER N 1/2 OF LOT 1 & 1.50 $1,843.86 322 E. 5TH AVE. N 1/2 OF W 1/2 - 2 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 E 1/2 OF 2 &ALL OF 3, BLK. 53 SHAKOPEE CITY :27-001392-0 CHRISTIAN BARLAGE &WIFE LOT 8, BLK. 53 0.50 $614.62 420 E. 4TH AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 1.00 Si,229.24 !27-001393-0 STEVEN & LORI PLIESEIS E 55' OF 9, 412 E. 4TH ST. BLK. 53 r SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 127-001394-0 RODNEY &JOYCE CLEMENS LOT 10 &W 5' OF 1.00 Si ,229.24 402 EAST 4TH AVE. 9, BLK. 53 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 127-001397-0 VIOLET JOHNSEN LOT 3, BLK. 54 0.50 $614.62 RT. 1 , BOX 320 SHAKOPEE CITY ST. ARIES, ID 83861 1 pp $1,229.24 127-001398-0 MARIE REIN LOT 4, BLK. 54 329 E. 5TH AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 i 38 ESTIMATED SPENCER STREET ASSESSMENT (1ST AVE. TO SHAKOPEE AVE. EXCEPT FROM 3RD AVE. TO 4TH AVE.)LEGAL NUMBER TPID # OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT 1.00 Si ,229.24 I27-001399-0 WILLIARD FORSTER &WIFE LOT 5, BLK. 54SHAKOPEE CITY 335 E. 5TH AVE. SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 0.75 $921.93 27-001400-0 AUDREY MONNENS E 45' OF 6 338 E. 4TH ST. BLK. 54 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY II27-001401-0 THOMAS SCHMIDT W 15' OF 6 &ALL 1.25 $1 ,536.55 330 E. 4TH AVE. OF 7, BLK. 54 T SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 127-001402-0 RAYMOND WINKEL &WIFE 'LOT 8, BLK. 54 0.50 $614.62 322 E. 4TH AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 0.50 $614.62 27-001571-0 BERYL LILL LOT 3, BLK. 76 319 E. 6TH AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 1.00 $1,229.24 27-001572-0 EDWARD &TAMA VOHNOUTKA LOT 4, BLK. 76SHAKOPEE CITY 327 E. 6TH AVE. SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 1 pp $1,229.24 27-001572-1 RANDY & NITA WAGNER LOT 5, BLK. 76 532 S. SPENCER ST. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 1.00 Si,229.24 27-001573-0 DAVID KIVISTO LOT 6, BLK. 76 334 E. 5TH AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 1.50 51,843.86 27-001574-0 EDWARD SIEBENALER &WIFE LOTS 7 & 8 322 E. 5TH AVE. BLK. 76 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001577-0 MARVIN & MARGARET STIER LOT 1 &W'ERLY 23' 1.50 $1,843.86 537 S. SPENCER ST. OF 2 EX N 8' FOR SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 ALLEY, BLK. 77 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001578-0 ARTHUR SKAUGE &WIFE LOT 3 EX W'ERLY 1.00 I $1 ,229.24 423 E. 6TH AVE. 25.5' OF 4 & 5 & SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 FRACTIONAL LOTS EX N 8' FOR ALLEY BLK. 77 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001579-0 HAROLD KOLLASCH &WIFE LOT 2 EX W'ERLY 1.00 S1,229.24 415 E. 6TH AVE. 23' & 25.5' OF 3 1 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 EX N 8' FOR ALLEY BLK. 77 SHAKOPEE CITY 127-001582-0 LINDA DOEPKE LOT 8 EX S. 8' 0.50 $614.62 420 E. 5TH AVE. FOR ALLEY, BLK. 77 i SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 39 ESTIMATED SPENCER STREET ASSESSMENT (1ST AVE. TO SHAKOPEE AVE. EXCEPT FROM 3RD AVE. TO 4TH AVE.)LEGAL NUMBER --PID # OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT LOT 9 EX S. 8' 1.00 $1,229.24 27-001583-0 LINDA DOEPKE 420 E. 5TH AVE. FOR ALLEY, BLK. 77 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 127-001584-0 ESTHER JOHNSON LOT 10 EX S. 8' 1.00 $1 ,229.24 404 E. 5TH AVE. FOR ALLEY, BLK. 77 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 127-001585-0 CATHERINE PASS S 60' OF LOTS 1 1.00 $1,229.24 639 S. SPENCER TO 3 EX 16', SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 BLK. 78 SHAKOPEE CITY ?7-001586-0 'HAROLD CASTLE &WIFE S 60' OF E 16' 0.00 $0.00 507 E. 7TH OF BLK. 78 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY ?7-001587-0 SEAN & CHAROLOTTE LAUGHLIN N 60' OF S 120' OF 1.00 $1,229.24 -- 629 SPENCER ST. 1-2-3 & N 22' OF SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 S 142' OF E 16' OF BLK. 78 T SHAKOPEE CITY 127-001589-0 CLEMENS MENDEN &WIFE N 22' OF LOTS 1.00 $1,229.24 619 SPENCER ST. 1-2-3 &7-8-9 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 EX E 16' & S 22' OF BLK. 78 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001590-0 EUGENE MENDEN &WIFE S 60' OF N 120' 1.00 $1,229.24 615 SPENCER ST. OF 7 TO 10 EX SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 E 16', BLK. 78 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001591-0 BERTRAND GOEMER &WIFE N 60' OF LOTS 7 1.00 $1,229.24 603 SPENCER ST. TO 10 EX E 16' SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 BLK. 78 ISHAKOPEE CITY '.7-001595-0 DAVID &JOANNE BLOCK E 50' OF 3 & 0.50 $614.62 309 7TH AVE. E. W 25' OF S 71' SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 OF 4, BLK. 79 SHAKOPEE CITY � 7-001596-0 RONALD GRATZ S 71' OF LOTS 4 & 1.00 $1,229.24 335 E. 7TH AVE. 5 EX W 25' OF S SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 71' OF 4, BLK. 79 SHAKOPEE CITY T 127-001597-0 STANLEY DELBOW N 71' OF LOTS 4 & 1.00 $1 ,229.24 626 SPENCER ST. 5, BLK. 79 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001760-0 CYNTHIA ERICKSON LOT 3 BLOCK 102 0.50 S614.62 21482 PARK BLVD SHAKOPEE CITY JORDAN, MN. 55352 T 40 STIMATED SPENCER STREET ASSESSMENT3RD AVE. TO 4TH AVE.) (.1ST AVE. TO SHAKOPEE AVE. FROM EXCEPTLEGAL NUMBER TAD # OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS,ASSESSMENT 127-001761-0 JACK A & VENETTA M ANDERSON S 71' OF K 102 5 1.00 $1,229.24 13550 TOWNLINE AVE. SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY f27-001762-0 GLORIA J PASS N71' OF4 & 5 1.00 $1,229.24 726 SPENCER ST. BLOCK 102 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 1127-001763-0 JOHN A & SUSAN B BERENS N 71' OF 6 & 7 1.00 $1,229.24 706 S. SPENCER ST. BLOCK 102 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 127-001764-0 WALTER F RUHLAND & WIFE S 71' OF 6 & 7 1.00 S1,229.24 716 SPENCER ST. BLOCK 102 - SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-001765-0 HERBERT DALLMANN &WIFE LOT 8, BLK. 102 0.50 $614.62 320 E. 7TH AVE. SHAKOPEE CITY SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 1 00 $1,229.24 27-001768-0 RODNEY L JOHNSON IS 71' OF 1 & 2 735 S. SPENCER ST. BLOCK 103 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 127-001769-0 DANIEL J & MARGARET M SIEDOW N 71' OF 1 & 2 1.00 $1 ,229.24 727 S. SPENCER BLOCK 103 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 127-001770-0 EDMUND H MOSSER &WIFE LOTS 8 TO 10 EX 1.00 $1,229.24 404 E. 7TH AVE. S1/2 71' OF SAID SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 LOTS BLOCK 103 SHAKOPEE CITY '_7-001771-0 ELIZABETH T GREEN S1/2 OF LOTS 8,9 & 1.00 $1,229.24 715 SPENCER ST. 10 BLOCK 103 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY ?7-001772-0 LEO A & AURELIA HOEN N 1/2 OF LOT 4 0.00 $0.00 827 SPENCER ST. BLOCK 104 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY ?7-001773-0 OLIVER V WITTENBERG PART OF S1/2 OF 1 0.00 $0.00 845 SPENCER ST. BLOCK 104 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY '.7-001774-0 LAVERNE J KOTSMITH PART OF S1/2 OF 1 0.00 $0.00 839 S. SPENCER ST. BLOCK 104 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY ?7-001779-0 PETER E SULLIVAN &WIFE N 71' OF LOTS 4-5 1.00 Si,229.24 826 S. SPENCER BLOCK 105 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY ?7-001780-0 HILLARD H BACKMANN &WIFE S 71' OF LOTS 4-5 1.00 $1,229.24 _ 836 S. SPENCER ST. BLOCK 105 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY ?7-001781-0 FRANCES E BOHLINGER S 71' OF LOTS 6-7 1.00 1 $1 ,229.24 814 SPENCER ST. BLOCK 105 l SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 41 ESTIMATED SPENCER STREET ASSESSMENT (1ST AVE. TO SHAKOPEE AVE. EXCEPT FROM 3RD AVE. TO 4TH AVE.)LEGAL NUMBER - ?ID # OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT 27-001782-0 DAVID LEE THOMPSON N 71' OF LOTS 6-7 1.00 Si,229.24 336 E. 8TH AVE. BLOCK 105 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 127-001783-0 VALENTINE G PINK &WIFE E 50' OF LOT 8 0.50 $614.62 324 E. 8TH AVE. BLOCK 105 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE CITY 27-010001-0 LEROY M STOCKER &WIFE LOT 1 BLOCK 298 1.00 $1,229.24 508 E. 7TH AVE. WERMERSKIRCHEN'S SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 2ND ADDN. 127-010002-0 BRUCE H JOHNSON LOT 2 BLOCK 298 0.50 $614.62 516 E. 7TH AVE. WERMERSKIRCHEN'S SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 2ND ADDN. 27-010006-0 HAROLD G CASTLE &WIFE LOT 1 BLOCK 299 1.00 $1,229.24 507 E. 7TH AVE. WERMERSKIRCHEN'S SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 2ND ADDN. 27-010015-0 LORIN B PULKRABEK W 60' OF LOT 9 1.00 $1,229.24 506 E. 6TH AVE. BLOCK 299 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 WERMERSKIRCHEN'S j2ND ADDN. 27-010018-0 KORY BEIREIS LOT 1, BLK. 300 0.50 $614.62 507 E. 6TH AVE. WERMERSKIRCHEN'S SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 2ND ADDN. 27-023008-0 MARK L & KARI S HOUSER LOT 5 (EX. E 20') 1.00 $1,229.24 417 SHAKOPEE AVE. E. & LOT 6 BLOCK 2 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 CLETUS LINK ADDN. 27-901017-0 HARRIETTE J STEIN P/O SE1/4 SE1/4 BEG SE COR 1.00 51,229.24 852 S. SPENCER ST. BLOCK 105 S 125.5', W 152.6' SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 N 98.7', E 150' TO BEG SECT 1 T 115 R23 27-901020-0 MYRON C & GLORIA A ASPER COM 48.4' W SE COR N 150', 1.00 $1,229.24 I 335 SHAKOPEE AVE E. W 47.5', S 147.4', E 75' TO SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 BEG IN SE1/4 SE1/4 SECT 1 T 115 R23 27-901028-0 JOHN E &JANICE A PLOOF P/O SE1/4 SE1/4 COM 183.4' 0.50 I $614.62 319 SHAKOPEE AVE. E. W OF E LINE, N 147.4', W 60' SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 S 147.4', E 60' TO BEG SECT 1 T 115 R23 27-901029-0 STEVEN A KERBER P/O SE1/4 SE1/4 BEG 123.4' 1.00 $1,229.24 327 SHAKOPEE AVE. E. W OF E LINE SE1/4 SE1/4, l SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 N 147.4', W60', S 147.4' E 60' TO BEG SECT 1 T 115 R23 127-906071-0 OLIVER V WITTENBERG 21/100 A. IN SW1/4, SW1/4 1.00 $1,229.24 845 SPENCER ST. SECT 6 T115 R22 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 42 -',ESTIMATED SPENCER STREET ASSESSMENT (1ST AVE. TO SHAKOPEE AVE. EXCEPT FROM 3RD AVE. TO 4TH AVE.)LEGAL NUMBER -,'ID # OWNER DESCRIPTION OF LOTS ASSESSMENT 127-906072-0 LAVERNE J KOTSMITH P/O SW1/4 SW1/4 BEG 316.55' 1.00 $1,229.24 839 S. SPENCER ST. N OF INTERS OF SPENCER AND SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SHAKOPEE AVE, NW 60.15', NE 34.4', E 130', S 45', SW 154.4' TO BEG. SECT 6 T115 R22 127-906076-0 ;ELLEN PIEPER P/O SW1/4 SW1/4 STARTING SE 1.00 $1,229.24 815 S. SPENCER ST. COR OF LOT 10 E 57.9', N SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 72.1', W. 57.9', S 72.1' TO BEG SECT 6 T115 R22 27-906077-0 LEO A & AURELIA HOEN 115.8'x72.1' IN SW1/4 SW1/4 1.00 $1,229.24 827 SPENCER ST. SECT 6 T115 R22 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 ?7-906079-0 MARK E GRUETZMACHER 36/100 A. IN SE1/4 SE1/4 1.00 $1,229.24 857 S. SPENCER ST. SECT 1 T115 R23 & SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 .33 A. IN SW1/4SW1/4 EX.03 A SECT 6 T115 R22 -27-906082-0 MARGARET M LEMAY P/O SW1/4 SW1/4 BEG 57.9' E 1.00 $1,229.24 512 E. 8TH AVE. OF NE COR BLK 104, E 57.9', SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 S 144.2', W 57.9', N 144.2', TO BEG SECT 6 T115 R22 27-906085-0 CHERYL J HABECK P/0 SW1/4 SW1/4 BEG ON S 0.50 $614.62 522 E 8TH AVE. LINE 8TH ST, 115.8' E OF NE SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 COR BLK 104, E 57.9', S 144.2', W 57.9', N144.2' TO BEG SECT 6 T115 R22 -27-906087-0 JAMES A &JULIE A SCHMIT STARTING7'NIN E COR 4OW1BLK4 04 1 00 $1,229.24 1076 PRAIRIE ST. SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SECT 6 T115 R22 -27-906088-0 FRANCES M SPIELMAN P/O SW1/4 SW1/4 BEG 57.87' 1.00 $1,229.24 511 E. 8TH AVE. E OF SE COR 2 BLK 103, E SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 57.87', N 142.9', W 57.87', S 143.5' TO BEG ISECT 6 T115 R22 27-906090-0 PAUL SCMIDT &WIFE P/O SW1/4 SW1/4 BEG SE COR 1.00 $1,229.24 503 E. 8TH AVE. LOT 2 BLK 103, E 57.87', N SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 143.5', W 57.87', S 144.2' TO BEG SECT 6 T115 R22 27-906106-0 WALLACE G & GENEVIEVE BASTIAN 33/100 /00 A. IN THEREOF SW1/4 EX 1.00 $1,229.24 869 SPENCER ST. SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SECT 6 T115 R22 27-906107-0 WALLACE G & GENEVIEVE BASTIAN 14/100 BEING A. IN N SW55' /4OF SW1/4 109 0.00 $0.00 869 SPENCER ST. SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 SECT 6 T115 R22 TOTALS = 81.00 $99,568.44 COST PER LOT= $1,229.24 43 CONSEi'1 NC/ MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Bloomington Ferry Bridge DATE: February 24 , 1993 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 3754 , which approves plans and specifications for Stage 3 of the Bloomington Ferry Bridge . BACKGROUND: Stage 3 of the Bloomington Ferry Bridge consists of the roadway work on the north side of the river and the bridge lighting, including both sides of the river. Because a portion of the lighting project is within the City of Shakopee, the City must approve the plans and specifications by resolution. Stage 3 does not include any portion of CSAH 18 south of CSAH 16 . Attached is Resolution No. 3754 approving plans and specifications for Stage 3 for City Council consideration. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 3754 , A Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications for Stage 3 of the Bloomington Ferry Bridge/ County State Aid Highway 18 Project, County Project No. S.P. 70-618-27 and move its adoption. DEH/pmp MEM3754 SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 600 COUNTRY TRAIL EAST JORDAN, MN 55352-9339 612) 496-8346 FAX (612) 496-8365 BRADLEY J.LARSON Highway Engineer DANIEL M.JOBE February 18 , 1993 Asst.Highway Engineer-Design DON D. PAULSON Asst.Highway Engineer-Construction Mr. Dave Hutton Director of Public Works City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: CSAH 18/Bloomington Ferry Bridge SP 70-618-27 , Stage 3 Dear Dave: We are submitting a resolution for SP 70-618-27/Stage 3 of the Bloomington Ferry Bridge project for City approval . Stage 3 construction plans involve the roadway work on the north side of the river . Also included in Stage 3 is the bridge lighting on both sides of the river, which is why the City' s approval is required. Plans for Stage 3 are available upon request . Design of this project is substantially complete . Continuing coordination with Mn/DOT may result in detail changes to the plans . However, such changes should be of a technical nature and should not affect the essential elements of the project . Attached is a sample resolution for approval of this stage . Your earliest attention to the approval is appreciated. If you have any questions or would like additional information, please contact this office. Sincerely, Rgtt: Scott M. Merkley Engineering Coordinator SMM/kmg Att . An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer RESOLUTION NO. 3754 A Resolution Approving Plans And Specifications For Stage 3 Of The Bloomington Ferry Bridge18 erojct County State Aid Highway 18_618-ee7 County Project No. S.P. WHEREAS, plans for Project No. SP 70-618-27 showing proposed grades and cross-sections for construction,al the profiles, improvement of County State Aid reconstruction or imp as a Federal/State Aid Highway No. 18 within the limits res nted to the City of Shakopee. the City project have been prepared and p NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE be in all ntCILgsCIL FaTHEo CITY OF SHp,I{OPEE, MINNESOTA: that said plans Council of the ed. Adopted in session of the dCait ' ofdop held this — y City of Shakopee, Minnesota, 1993 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney CONSENT MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CIITY COUNCIL FROM: Karen Marty, City AttorneX/�! DATE: February 26 , 1993 RE: Resolution No. 3755 BACKGROUND: A few months ago the City Council released Lot 1, Block 1, Halo Second Addition, from the requirements of the Shakopee Valley Square Planned Unit Development . This is the motel at the northeast corner of Marschall Road and First Avenue. The motel had been acquired by a bank. In trying to clear the title to sell the motel, the bank discovered that various property lawyers felt that it was not clear enough that the motel was free from the conditions of the planned unit development agreements . They also were uncertain as to whether the parking requirements for the miniature golf course applied to the motel property somehow. In order to eliminate their questions so that the property can be sold, the bank has asked us to clarify that the motel is indeed released from the planned unit development agreements and is not a part of the miniature golf course parking resolution. The attached resolution takes care of this. ALTERNATIVES : 1 . Adopt Resolution No. 3755, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Releasing Lot 1, Block 1, Halo Second Addition From the Development Agreements Relating to the Shakopee Valley Square Planned Unit Development, and Clarifying that Resolution No. 3207 does not Apply to Lot 1, Block 1 . 2 . Do not adopt Resolution No. 3755 . 3 . Table for additional information from staff . RECOMMENDATION: Alternative 1 . [26RES] Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 3755 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, RELEASING LOT 1, BLOCK 1, HALO SECOND ADDITION FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE SHAK VALLEY U32PL0ED TNIT VON AND CLARIFYINGTHATRESOLUTIONNO. 07DNOAPPLYTOLOT I, BLOCK 1 . WHEREAS, on August 18, 1992, the Shakopee City Council lo approved Resolution 3653, which removed Lot 1, Block 1, Second Addition from the Planned Unit Development for Shakopee Valley Square; and WHEREAS, said lot also may be released from the development agreements relating to that Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, on March 20, 1990, the City Council Amended the Final Plan for Shakopee Valley Square First Addition Planned Unit Development to allow a miniature golf course, and requiring additional parking; and WHEREAS, this miniature golf course and parking are not located on Lot 1, Block 1, Halo Second Addition. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: That Lot 1, Block 1, Halo Second Addition, Scott County, Minnesota, is hereby released from the requirements of the Shakopee Valley Square Development Agreement, dated December 1, 1987, and filed April 19, 1988, in the office of the County Recorder for Scott County, Minnesota, as Document No. 245792 , and from the requirements of any amendments thereto, including the Development Agreement Amendment dated January 17, 1989, and filed June 14 , 1989, in the office of the County Recorder for Scott County, Minnesota, as Document No. 259520 . on No. 3207, ted Be it furtherdoesenotved,pertaintoreapplylto Lot 1, Block 1, Halo March 20, 1990, Second Addition. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1993 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest : City Clerk as to form: DA54',21L City Attorney Approved = � [RES3755] (/ r— jy 14 MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerortionin Special Assessments k RE: Resolution No. 3750, Apportioning p Against Lots Within the Meadows 8th Addition DATE: February 23 , 1993 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND: The final plat of the Meadows 8th Addition has been filed with the Scott County Recorder. There are special assessments existing against the original parcels from which this plat originated. It is appropriate at this time to apportion the special assessments against the original parcel (Outlot A, The Meadows 7th Addition) against the newly created parcels within The Meadows 8th Addition. The Developer has agreed to the apportionment which was part of the Developer's Agreement. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Offer Resolution No. 3750, A Resolution Apportioning Assessments Among New Parcels Created as a Result of the Platting of The Meadows 8th Addition, and moved its adoption. JSC/tiv RESOLUTION NO. 3750 A RESOLUTION APPORTIONING ASSESSMENTS AMONG NEW PARCELS CREATED AS A RESULT OF PLATTING OF THE MEADOWS 7TH ADDITION WHEREAS, on August 25, 1981, Resolution No. 1891 adopted by the City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted by construction of the 1981-1 V.I.P. Interceptor; and WHEREAS, on September 20, 1988 , Resolution No. 2946 adopted by the City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted by construction of the Valley Industrial Park Sewer Extension from the West side of County Road 17 to the East side of County Road 79 , Project No. 1987-13 ; and WHEREAS, on October 18, 1988 , Resolution No. 2974 adopted by the City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid against the parcels created because of the platting of The Meadows 1st Addition; and WHEREAS, on October 3 , 1989 , Resolution No. 3121 adopted by the City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid against the parcels created because of the platting of The Meadows 2nd Addition; and WHEREAS, part of Outlots B and E of The Meadows 1st Addition and Outlots A and D of The Meadows 2nd Addition have been subdivided into the plat of The Meadows 4th Addition; and WHEREAS, on June 5, 1990, Resolution No. 3237 adopted by the City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid against the parcels created because of the platting of The Meadows 4th Addition; and WHEREAS, the balance of Outlot E of The Meadows 1st Addition has been subdivided into the plat of The Meadows 5th Addition; and WHEREAS, on August 6, 1991, Resolution No. 3437 adopted by the City parcels createdobecause the installments platt g remaining The unpaid Meadows against 5th the parcel Addition; and WHEREAS, Outlot C, The Meadows 4th Addition and Outlots B & C, The Meadows 5th Addition have been subdivided into the plat of The Meadows 6th Addition; and WHEREAS, on November 19 , 1991, Resolution No. 3494 adopted by the City Councilapportioned rcreated because of the platting unpaid against the parcelsplatting of The Meadows 6th Addition; and Resolution No. 3750 Page -2- WHEREAS, Outlot A, The Meadows 3rd Addition, Outlot B, The Meadows 1st Addition, and Outlot B, The Meadows 6th Addition have been subdivided into the plat of The Meadows 7th Addition; and WHEREAS, on August 18th, 1992 , Resolution No. 3644 adopted by the City Council apportioned the installments remaining unpaid against the parcels created because of the platting of The Meadows 7th Addition; and WHEREAS, on November 17 , 1992 , Resolution No. 3705 adopted by the City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted by construction of the Vierling Drive roadway improvements from CR- 17 to CR-79 , Project No. 1992-3 ; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to apportion the installments remaining unpaid against Outlot A, The Meadows 7th Addition because of the platting of The Meadows 8th Addition; and WHEREAS, the property owners have agreed to the apportionment through the execution of a developers agreement for The Meadows 8th Addition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA That the 1993 payable remaining balance of assessments to parcel 27-169-050-0 in the amount of $4 , 065 . 98 for the 1981-1 V. I .P. Interceptor, $19 , 688 . 85 for the 1987-13 V. I.P. Sanitary Sewer Extension, and $120 . 712 . 37 for the 1992-3 Vierling Drive Roadway Improvements are hereby apportioned as outlined in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all other parts of Resolution Numbers 1891, 2946, 2974 , 3121, 3237 , 3437 , 3494 , and 3644 shall continue in effect. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 2nd day of March, 1993 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form , City Attorney N N) N) N) N) N) J -4 J -4 I '13 m I I I I _ -� v v v v v `' �' w w w w . rd CO 0 03 CO 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 Z " o 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 N 0 0 C) v a) I I 1 -t 11 cit 1 1 1 1 10 p o o Cl)C 0 0 0 0 o Cb 0 coCOW CO CO CO ~ rti CO CO co CO Mco Z 2 2 2 2 2 2 I- � Opr- ' 00I- c(n0r- co 0� pr (POr � Or � OrJOr- JOrr- ( O0 M V) -Gvr -< � r '< � r � r -< r_ _< 1- -.< r '< r 0 CI) Z N p Z N p Z N p Z N p Z N p Z N p Z N p Z N p Z N p Z m p m m m • m Um mZ DZ DDZ DZW DZ DZDDZ C/) Z D r- C D D C D r. C D 1D- C D r C D C ii D c 73 D G7 M D O W D O Cl) jj 1J D ° 2 D O 2 D G7 O Z �,OjTZ {� ZO , � OTzpm � � m � 0m � � m � om � CIm O w Z • pD Z p< -mi Z 0 -{ Z D -i Z < 0 Z < 0 Z < 0 Z < 0 z < p z < p Z Z TI < p • < p • < p • < p p O v, mmcnmmcnmmcnmmcnmmcnmm0 mcnmm � m < � m < m z 4NZ • 4, z • 4, Z • AZ � az � 4, 4, � • • � •z m r- Kr Kr _ __ D D D O Omm DDDDDD 0D D D D D r zo 010pOWp p -4 p p a) p p cn p p A p p w p p N n 00 - 00ppOW —pOWpOWpOWpOW0030co O -� W � r - r- --i r- -I r- -I r � r- 11 E- --i r � rmD O W O O W oOU) 0O0) OOWOO (/) OOWOOWOOWOOcnOr, x Z Zz p m H -IX X -IT --1x -ix HT --H T` _ X _z Z 2 .._. 2 - _ -, 2 -i 1 1 1 1 ~ Crrl+ D 1-i Cn c0 bO (/) 03 H Cn N N) N N N N N J N) v m — V V V V V V V v v Z "0 v v v v v v - J v --1 V v v D CD CO w 'm'^^ 1 Ci) l `e `9 V/ w _j _. 1 1 < 1 03 1 CO WW CO m G3 03 CO 03 03 CO A A A A A A A A •A Z 'D A D CO Co 00 OD 03 CO 03 OD 03 Co Cn Cn _ � cco to Cn N 03 ffl 4 D 07 07 69 69 CO CO CO N)03 CX)N 1 N3 CO N N N N N NA A A m 0) A A A A A A c0 CAD c0 CAD CAD (A0 c0 cD —1 CO � T - > Cn cn --1 m b pa 6o to to 69 69 69 61 69 69 69 Cl) CD CO CO rn CO 03 rn CO rn a' a) a) Z r A A V A A ? ? ? A --I O A A A A I-«. a' N N) N N t v v J J J I I I I I -0 a 0) J J J V J v W W CZ poa c4 0 V W W W O O O O O 0 Oa O0 O O1 0 Z crO 1 ..1 O f NO co I O � O I 0 O O O O O O W CO CO CD CO CO y COCO CO CO DO co 17 00 77 Co 1700 W co 27 o W o O X G" C 17 coC W T o0 00 � G7 -D r- � 0r- (J1 d Od (40 � cn0I- cn0r � Or JOr (4Or (4O Do a -< 'I O -< O -< J O - N r - J r - J r -< r r < r r 0 Z N p Z N p Z N p Z N p Z IN p Z tN p Z R p Z 1N p Z N p Z N p D D Z D r C D r C D rD' C D D C D D C D D C D r C 17 D O D D C - Cl) r 0 D m D 0 W D ,o x D 0 3' D 0 W D ,0 W D O - z O - om � zpmKomomom om z6,--) .. om omKom 0 m 5 › H5 › —iZD --1Z › Hz› HzD —IZD --1z › Hz › H •z < p z z < p - < o • < p • < p < p < a -vi < 0 - < a - < a • mm z '� v, !n m cn !n m cn FI m at m m cn F1 m cn • � •z < Az < AZ < AZ <• A •z < AZ < A •z < A •z < A •z < A •z < m 0, Ln V Di , U, U, v, 01 cn CA a K r Kr- Kr- Kr- Kr- Kr- Kr- Kr- Ko s o p 0 mO mO mO m0 m0 mO m0 m0 m � m -im Z3 p D m O p cn p p A O p w 0 0 tv 0 0 0 p N 0 0 i O p 0 p 71 0 r p 0 W ° O W p O W p 0 W ° O W p 0 W p 0 W p p " ° 0 ,, en m z OWOOWOOWOOcnOOcnOOcnOOcnOOWOOU) OOU) O -Ir t Z w n Z -i n z o0 n Z o0 n z w x z -i x Z � x Z -i x Z -i O z H z z Z 2w = W 2w = w 2w = W 2N) 2N3 2 _, D, U) co U'^ CD w co m ) V Efl fl N N N N N N N) vJN C v m — v V J -4 - .4 -I cnCD cn 9,1 �cCl) —. Efl V) 0) 1 .1 1 1 1 _ W W W W W C.3 03 A A A A A z • A A A A A A A A 0) co co co co co 00 O co C -. m co W to Efl Efl E 69 EA W (n N CO 0) CO CO CO N N N N N CO 03 7. W A A A A A A A A AA Z cD cD CO CD CD CO CAD CD (AA D CD —I D J M -1 O CD Efi CO Efl Efl CD A 69 CD C u) D UD CD CO CO CO r OD rn CO rn CO a) a) rn rn rn rn m A -A A A A A A A A A -I N N) N) N N i N N N I -4 -4 - J _1 -13 a I I I I - 11 J - -4 1 V J -403 CA3 03 GO Co CO U3 03 -4 w b O -4 -4 -4 o 0 0 00 o N N) N o Z 0 CO N) co N 0) U7 A w N I 0 o coI I II o o 0 I 0 0 0 o CO COW W W CO W CO W COCo m 00 17 0o 73 0o W w 77 0o W ao II O co O co00 0 x co O W w co 0X 0o0T� ° Or cn r � 0r � OI- JOru'i0r- J0 _R ,IO -< � Or_ 0r- JOr (4Or_ oil Cn � r Z N rp Z N p Z N p Z N p Z N p Z N Q Z N p Z N p Z N Q Z_am Q m Cl)z To m m Z 'D f71 Z W D Z > D Z W D Z "D D Z D r C D Dr C D r C D r C DrCDrCXjDG) j3 )> � WDG.) WDOWDO77DOXZoz - x z 0 T z T ZQ m T Z m ? o m - o m c m o m p m , Q m 0 m ' � -1 > -i D -► Z D H Z D -1 Z D H Z < ? < Z C Q Z < Q Z y m 0 ai m Om • m m C„ m mmcyt m m cn !n m 0 !TI m cn M. m cn !TI m m al MAZ5 � Z � aZ < Az < AZ •< AZ ` AZ • AZ •< AZ � AZ � JO m Q1 0 01 01 01 0, -10 b K 0 m 0 0 0 0 D m 0 D D O m 0 mu m o o 0 M m M --I --I -- DD --IDD --IDD --I `88a1880188 -4- 88 0 p p p 0 p -' 00 --‘ 00 -' 00 O 0 N O 0 1 O 0 p pp O cD p O wW 2 0 cm m m 0 co co _ o W = O W -� Wr -4 r '_I r D Z =IOW -=I � Wr --i � rr -- � r =� � r =� r — cnoocn ocn00U) 0 --{ r OU) OOWOOU) 00U) 00U) OOU) OOwOO � O CSO zwOZC) OZC0Zco0zco0zoD. 0 01xZ _ixZH � Z00.I m _ _ w = w = w = G.) 1 (A) = w 10) 2wZ y w cow D U) co U) co m — U) I N) N) N) N v J V J v Z W v V V v V - V V -4 v ---I V v 'D j cn Ti U] f 69 cn CO CA) wA A A Z A A A A .A A --i co A C) co co Co co co co co op D Cl) U) 0 to 0 69 69 0 0 0 cokft U) N CO co co co CO CO N)03 03 03 N) N) N) K co N) N) N) N N) N) A ? A m A A 'A A - .P. ? - .A Z CD A CD (Co (0 c0 cDD cD cD cD -'1 cD CD D Cl) Cl) —I m O 69 6' EA CD -I co op co W co cD c0 op CD CO w co co co co m r a) a) a) co a) a) a) Z v A A v v A A A --I ? A A .A A N N N N N N t J J v J j co W co CO W W CO W CO CO 0 A CO CO W O W CO Z O 0 O O co Cb V Q) CN A CO N 0 I I I I O O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 O Cl) CO COCOW COCOCOCO W OD CO = Moo X X X 03 O T O X O 10) O 10) O X 0D O X m � O � a DJ r< V Or -r< V Or -< V Or - JOr - � Or { - Or - -ul Or � � Or � J Or � JO O Z N O Z N O Z N O Z N O Z N O Z N O Z N O Z N O Z N O Z N O -D Cl) W y Z 'D D Z "D D Z W D Z D Z W D Z D Z D D Z D r C D D C W Cr) M D G) W D 0 W D O W D 3:1 > ,O W D ,° W D ° W D ,{ X Z X Z 0 - X Z O � Z {,) . Z o . Z o . Z 0 Z O _T. Z O T Z O .. 6") O m O t O m o m o m o m O m O m O m o m m Z < 0 z < 0 z < -i z < '� z < 0 0z < 0 0z < 0 Z < O Z < O •Z < 0 Z y U, m m 0, m m 0, m m 0 m m U, m m v, m m u, m mm u, !n m cn m m o m m m � zC � •Z < AZ • � Z • _Nz .Nz .AZ � � Z � AZ � z •< I m A A A A 0 • 0 • 0 • � Cn r rr r- - r O K r O KO OO OOOo00 DOD DDDDDDmZ DDDDDDD D D D O O -, O O N O O N O O wO O N O O N) O OOO O co-' V nCD m 0 OOWOOU, OOAOOOONOOOOOOOOOIOWWW O cn O O w O O w O O w O O w O O w O O w O O CDO O O O O -Ir' Z ao O Z ao O Z ao O Z w O Z ao O Z ao O Z ao O Z ao O Z ao O Z ao 0 p RN) H � H x H � H � H x -� T -+ x -� A -ice l' � z Z 2A IC.) = w I () 1 ) 1 ) = ca = w = w = w --I D cn co m cn I cn V V V V V -4 V V V v Z - V V V V V V "I .70 V V V V V V -4 a Cn (0 Cn0) ,m,^^ V V/ Cn CA) EA EA 69 69 EA EN) E9 EA EA EN) Cn C CO CO w w w w w °o m CA) COA A A CO A A A A A A Z ' A A A AOS :4. A •CO Z U CoC COO Cb coCb a) oo D C/) cn u) Ef) Ef) EA EA EA EA 69EA EA EA (n N a) co co co co co co A A A co co N z Ca N N A.A Z A A A A A CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CAD -I > CnW m O Efl E) Efl CO v CO co co co co co co co co a) a) 0o a) 0o a) a) co rn rn m 1-- a) a) a) a) a) rn Z A A A A A A A A A A -I N N N N N N N N NI N) v J J J v V J 1 j I 7) n J _, 1 1 J _, -4 CO J -4 w w w -4 0) 0 o O CO O O O O O A A Z O CD CO -.l a) A W N O I O O O O O O O 10 O O CI) CO w w COCOCOCO CO CO CO CO00 Tom Xao w0 M0 MoOMOOX &010 Ma) - _< O o O -< J 010 - J O - J O - O - J O J O r a cn r 01 x 01 0 O -n Z N D Z N 0 Z N D Z N D Z N D Z N D Z N D Z N D Z N D Z N 0 0 C/) -0 D z -vD Z -aD Z -p D Z D z D Z M M D D ZC D D C D r L D D C I Cn D r C I D C I D O L D O I D O M D O 1 D ,0 77 D O I D O -u z O Cn z o z 0 X Z O Z ? Z O Z O Z m o m o m - Om 0 cnmmmcnmm ul mmwmm01mmalmm01mm0mm01mm01mm m Z ~ cri z < u z < A z < C z 5 c Z 5 a Z 5 A z . z A Z < A Z ` '° m b b r r 0 m ° — 0o mo mo mp mp mo m0 momm DD -- DD -iDD - 4000) OOcnDDDADOw00NC7r 00o - 0 00 0 0 0 co 0 0 00 0 0 W 0 0 w 0 0 w 0 0 w 0 0 w 0 0 w ao 0 O OCD O OCn O O CD 0 O CD 0 O w O O w O0 O CD OO Oz C o o OZ cn p r R1 Zoix -ix -ix -i-4 H _ I Z y I , I A I4, I A A A A AA D (nco (D co m -y VI N) 69 N) N N N N N N Ni m — v iv v v - v v J -.1 -.I v Z - v V v V - v J -4 -i ' D Cp Cr) (/) w 'm'^^ 1 W �_ W CA W 0) CA AA A A A A• Z A A p Lo AA _I 07 03 CO co 0) CO 03 03 03• D C/) U) co 69 69 69 69 69 6/9 69 69 Cn N No 0) CO 0) iv co N N) N N -- W A A A A A A A A A A Z A A A A A CD CD CD CD CAD -- •I co co co 0 tD _ > Cn Cn M 0 69 cO CD CD CO CD in CD CO .. 1-- c)) > CD CO CDCD a) w w 0) co a) a) m r rn rn a) a) 0) a) a' a) Z A A A A A A A A A A -.I NJ NI NJ NJ J m o 0 0 0 0 ° o cn cn 01 cn 01 Z 0 cn - co NOoI 0 0 I 0 0 CI) CO CO CO CD CO 0:3 � co Coo0 co0XCoO � Co0XC° 0 -� _ I- O -< JO -< /- 1- cn O -t � rrJJ -< � r p cn ZNZNZNpZNpZNp C/) DpDpDDDZuZ0Z0ZZmmD Z O 2 Z O Z m Z m ? Z m 0 rn Z > -I Z > -1 Z D -' Z D -{ Z y -- Z • < p < p < p < p - < p Z y cn m m cn !n m cn !� m cn !l m cn !T1 m m � Z •<• a Z •< Z •< Z •< Z - m a, 0-i a, a, 01 A r0 - r 0 m p D O > D O > D O > >m -I D o O C 1 p 1 r m pp � pp � pO � oOWoOW7o0 O -i -1 io1.1 O -7OIr � r 5 > z O O � -3OO -IOcn --I000O W O -_ir —I ZoonZoocoZcoDZoonZooC� O Rt D H H H H 2 I I I A = 4, Z r y II V/ f co inCn 1 A N -+ .69 U) 01 tn Co V -.1 m < . boZ 3 Co 1 Co v v --I (D 609 Eil M w - 1 Co w 1 j 2. < co N o Co wm- w Co Co Co A A Z • .0 Co ia a cri co w v co °o D in V) 1 cn rn m to co O J el _ (n N J -4 CD v Co N w N w - A AZ G.) O 0 1 CAO CO --1 v COO cn — m- I kh co cn O 4, -69 cD w cn D A N A NJ w a a co 03 0 m r o w - 01 Z ? A Z LJ) t L;) L: I\I T MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Renewal of Premises Permit for the Lions Club of Shakopee DATE: February 22 , 1993 INTRODUCTION: The Shakopee Lions Club is making application with the Minnesota Gambling Control Board for renewal of their Premises Permit at 124 South Holmes Street (Jerry's Bar) . The attached Resolution No. 3743 approves the Premises Permit for the Lions Club of Shakopee beginning August 1, 1993 through July 31, 1995. (The Lions Club is not renewing thier Premises Permit for the Rock Spring Supper Club. ) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Offer Resolution No. 3743 , A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Approving a Premises Permit for the Lions Club of Shakopee, and move its adoption. JSC/tiv TAMI\JUDY\LIONS RESOLUTION NO. 3743 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, APPROVING PREMISES PERMIT FOR LIONS CLUB OF SHAKOPEE WHEREAS, the 1990 legislature adopted a law which requires municipal approval in order for the Gambling Control Board to issue or renew a premises permit; and WHEREAS, the Lions Club of Shakopee is seeking renewal of their permit beginning August 1, 1993 for their site at Jerry's Bar, 124 South Holmes Street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: That the premises permit for Lions Club of Shakopee, at 124 South Holmes Street, Shakopee, Minnesota is hereby approved. Passed in Regular Session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of March, 1993 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney ISCA, , MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Resolution No. 3758 - Maurice Stans Recognition DATE: March 1, 1993 INTRODUCTION: This year marks the 85th birthday of Mr. Maurice Stans. A resolution in honor of Mr. Stans 85th birthday has been drafted for Council approval . BACKGROUND: Mr. Stans has graciously made many contributions to the City of Shakopee over the past years. The proposed resolution if approved will be sent to Pepperdine University, Culver City, California where a book is being put together in recognition of Mr. Stans' accomplishments and contributions. The book will be presented to Mr. Stans during a birthday celebration being planned by Pepperdine University on March 23rd. RECOMMENDATION: Offer Resolution No. 3758 , A Resolution in Honor of Maurice Stans 85th Birthday and move its adoption. ACTION REOUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 3758 , A Resolution in Honor of the 85th Birthday of Mr. Maurice Stans, and move its adoption. RESOLUTION NO. 3758 A RESOLUTION IN HONOR OF THE 85TH BIRTHDAY OF MR. MAURICE STANS WHEREAS, Maurice Stans was born in Shakopee, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Maurice Stans was raised in the City of Shakopee where he received educational training at both elementary and high school levels; and WHEREAS, 1993 marks the 85th birthday of Maurice Stans; and WHEREAS, Maurice Stans has graciously contributed significant financial resources to the City of Shakopee which have contributed to the physical cultural improvement of the community; and WHEREAS, Maurice Stans contributions to St. Francis Regional Medical Center, the Shakopee School District, the Shakopee Public Library, the Shakopee Park System and Murphy's Landing have served to improve the quality of life for Shakopee residents. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota does hereby acknowledge and extend a heart felt Happy Birthday to Maurice Stans in honor of his 85th birthday. Adopted in regular session of the Shakopee City Council this 2nd day of March, 1993 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney MEMO TO: City Council and Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: David Hutton, Public Works Director RE: T.H. 169 Bridge DATE: March 2, 1993 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Today at approximately 2 :30 p.m. , staff received a phone call from MnDot requesting that the City of Shakopee execute a Cooperative Agreement covering the decorative lighting on the bridge. Shortly after the phone call the agreements were delivered to City staff. As the City Council previously discussed and acted on, the additional costs associated with the decorative lighting would be the City's expense. MnDot indicated that the agreements MUST be signed by the City before the March 12, 1993 bid letting or the letting would be delayed. Staff indicated that it would be impossible for the City Council to act on this item so quickly since there would not be any more Council meetings before the bid letting, excluding tonite's meeting. Staff also indicated that the City would not accept any responsibility for delays in the bid letting due to MnDot's bureaucratic and ineffecient way of doing things and lack of inter- governmental cooperation and planning on their part. Staff indicated that the agreements would be placed on the table for the Council, but that it would be up to the Council to determine if they wanted to act on the issue at tonite's meeting. The City Attorney will attempt to review the subject agreements prior to the City Council meeting. ACTION REQUESTED Move to direct the appropriate City officials to execute the Cooperative Agreement with MnDot regarding the funding for the decorative lighting on the T.H. 169 Bridge. o‘tANESOT4 Minnesota Department of Transportation ° Zo Metropolitan District Transportation Building 1.<,to Po St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 OF 1 RP' Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 Re 1 to Oakdale Office P y Telephone No. 779-1124 March 1, 1993 Mr. David E. Hutton, P.E. Public Works Director City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 SUBJECT: S.P. 7009-59 (TH 169) Mini Bypass Lighting Construction and Maintenance Agreement No. 70507 Dear Mr. Hutton: Attached are three copies of an agreement between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, and the City of Shakopee covering the cost, maintenance and electrical energy for the highway lighting system along the "Mini Bypass" from approximately 600' West of the Holmes Ramp approximately to a roximately 900' East of the First Avenue Connection in Shakopee. This agreement covers the remainder of the ornamental lighting scheduled to be constructed with this project. The cost participation is in line with the break down attached to my March 31, 1992 letter to you. Please review the agreement, and if approved, have all copiessigned .byteproper officials. Also affix the corporate seal to all copies of the agreementCity Please return all three signed copies to me for further x ecutio on behalf of the Department. A fully executed agreement will be returned to you for y If you have any questions, please call me at 779-1124. Sincerely Robert J. l asek, P.E. Division Lighting Operations Engineer Attachment: An Equal Opportunity Employer • • RESOLUTION NO. 3759 Approving Agreement With MnDOT for Lighting Along the Mini By-pass BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Shakopee enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: To install a new highway lighting system along the Trunk Highway No. 169 Bypass from approximately 600 feet West of the Holmes Street Ramp to approximately 900 feet East of the 1st Avenue Connection in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 70507, a copy of which was before the Council . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized ofotheexecute City allsuch ofagreement, contracaualthereby assume for and o obligations contained therein. CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Scott City of Shakopee I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Shakopee at a duly authorize93meeting thereof held on the day of shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. City Clerk (Seal)