Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/05/1993 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items DATE: December 31, 1992 1 . Attached are the unapproved minutes of the Shakopee Community Development Commission for December 16, 1992 . 2 . Attached are the unapproved minutes of the Shakopee Cable Communications Advisory Commission and Public Access Corporation minutes for December 7 , 1992 . 3 . Attached is a memorandum from the City Attorney regarding Trains Blocking Intersections. 4 . Attached is the January Business Update from City Hall . 5 . Attached are the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission minutes for July 13 and November 2 , 1992 . 6. Attached are the January 7 , 1993 agendas for the Planning Commission and the Board of Adjustment & Appeals meeting. 7 . Attached is information on the League of Minnesota Cities 1993 Conference for Newly Elected Officials and Two Seminars for Elected Officials. If you are interested in attending or would like more information, please contact Toni. 8 . Attached is the Police Newsletter for Council review. 9 . Attached is a memorandum from the City Attorney regarding the need for appraisal work in conjunction with the Second Avenue Improvement Project. 10. Attached is a memorandum from the Assistant City Administrator regarding the workload facing the Building Inspection Department for early 1993 . OFFICIAL MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 16, 1992 Chairman Mars called the meeting to order at 5: 30 p.m. with Commissioners Phillips, Unseth, VanHorn, Albinson and Mars present. Commissioners Miller and Brandmire were absent. Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator and Lindberg Ekola, City Planner were also present. Albinson\Unseth moved to approve the minutes of the November 18, 1992 meeting as kept. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock gave a brief economic development update. He noted that there are several major remodeling projects going on in the City at this time. He also noted that in November single family housing permits totaled 16 as compared to 2 in 1991. Mr. Stock noted that residential development is continuing at a pace far exceeding last years level. Mr. Stock noted that several months ago he presented to the CDC a list of the proposed planning projects that need to be pursued in the near future. At the request of the CDC, Mr. Ekola is present at tonight' s meeting to give a brief overview of each of the plans that will be initiated in the next one to three years. Mr. Ekola noted that City Council allocated $50, 000. 00 in the 1993 budget to complete several planning studies. The studies that will be pursued in 1993 by outside consultants include an update to the downtown plan, an analysis of the County Road 17 bypass intersection, a study of the east Shakopee transportation plan, a traffic control plan and a bypass noise impact study. Mr. Ekola noted that the zoning ordinance update is being completed by the Legal Department. Several other studies will be completed in house including an update to the subdivision regulations. Mr. Ekola also noted that the Comprehensive Sewer Plan is nearing completion. Mr. Ekola then reviewed several other planning studies proposed for 1994 and thereafter. Mr. Albinson questioned whether or note staff is following the MDIF process. Mr. Ekola noted that both Councilmember Vierling and himself attend the Southwest Metro Planning Coalition meetings. This Coalition is comprised of several Cities in the Minnesota River Valley. Mr. John Boland, former Met Council Chair serves as their lobbyist. Mr. Boland is tracking the MDIF process for the Coalition. Mr. Albinson noted that he is also attending the hearings regarding the MDIF process. Mr. Albinson questioned whether or not the street width study has been completed. Mr. Ekola responded in the negative. Mr. Albinson noted that the Urban Land Institute has a street width study format that staff might find useful in completing the study. Mr. Ekola noted that he would follow up on this information. Official Proceedings of the December 16, 1992 Community Development Commission Page -2- Mr. Albinson questioned the timing of the East Dean Lake study. The present plan calls for the study to be completed at the end of 1995. Mr. Albinson noted that he felt that there was consensus when the comp plan was being prepared that this study would be completed in 1993 not 1995. Mr. Stock noted that 1995 has been the date that has been repeated on several occasions at various meetings that he has attended. Mr. Albinson stated that he was sure that the consensus at both the Comprehensive Plan Committee level and Council level was for this area to be re-studied in 1993 not 1995. Mr. Ekola stated that he would research the minutes of the former Comprehensive Plan Committee meetings and Council meetings to determine if there has been an error in the proposed completion date for this study. Discussion ensued on several of the other planning studies. Mr. Ekola stated that perhaps the CDC could develop some type of medium to educate the public in regard to the findings of these studies as they are completed. Mr. Mars thanked Mr. Ekola for attending the meeting. Mr. Stock noted that the CDC has discussed in the past the possibility of establishing a City newsletter. He noted that the most recent City survey indicated that 73% of the citizens who responded favored publishing a newsletter on local government and community activities. 29% of those responding strongly supported the concept. Mr. Stock noted that when the City was obtaining logo proposals, one of the possible contractors noted that they had newsletter experience. The contractor offered to complete a quotation for a newsletter design and editorial services. Mr. Stock noted that the cost of the service was approximately $10, 000. 00 per year. He noted that this did not include mailing and printing costs. Mr. Stock went on to state that there are several other options in regard to developing a newsletter. One of the options would be to have a newsletter produced in house. In the past, this has been tried but was not very successful due to the limited amount of staff time available to produce such a piece. Mr. Stock noted that the City of Savage contracts with an individual who completes the entire newsletter. The individual also sells ads to offset costs of the newsletter. Additionally, the City pays the individual a small retainer. Mr. Albinson stated that he did not want to see a newsletter cluttered with advertising. Commissioner VanHorn stated that he felt it was important to have the newsletter paid for by something other than the general fund. Mr. Albinson stated that the recent survey indicated a strong level of support for a newsletter and the City should try to provide one. He felt the piece should be funded out of the general fund. Mr. Van Horn questioned whether or not people would have responded differently if they knew that it was going to be funded out of the City's general fund. Mr. Albinson stated that the community survey questioned whether or not Proceedings of the December 16, 1992 Community Development Commission Page -3- residents were willing to pay more for increased services. The vast majority of the survey respondents stated that they would. He felt that this would be a very valuable service for Shakopee residents. Mr. Mars stated that he thought that the City Hall Business Update which is completed each month by staff is an excellent piece. He questioned whether or not something like this could be expanded. He noted that he did not feel residents needed a full blown explanation of every project. He felt just a paragraph or two on topics of interest would at least keep the residents informed. Mr. Unseth questioned whether or not the Shakopee Valley News would be willing to allocate a page or two on a quarterly basis for information that could be provided from City staff. Mr. Stock stated that this avenue has never been pursued. He noted that only Shakopee newspaper subscribers would receive the piece. Mr. Stock noted that perhaps it would be possible to add a two page spread in the spring and fall Recreation/Community Education brochure. He noted that this piece is already being produced and is mailed directly to every Shakopee resident. The only cost for this type of piece would be to print the additional two pages which would be nominal and the staff time to prepare the text. If the piece is only done on a bi-annual basis it would require relatively little time. In fact we could simply take information from each of the business updates from City Hall during the previous six month period. Commission Van Horn questioned the funding for this piece. Mr. Stock noted that at the present time the cost for the brochure is split between the School District and City. Mr. Mars suggested that staff come back at our next meeting with examples of what other City's are doing. At that time we can also discuss possible funding options. Discussion ensued on the One Year Economic Action Plan. Mr. Stock noted that he would propose to incorporate the planning studies that are being considered for completion in 1993 into the one year work plan. Discussion ensued on several other objectives to be included into the one year work plan. Mr. Stock stated that he would incorporate the suggestions of the CDC into the one year work plan and bring it back for their consideration at their January meeting. The one year work plan can then be forwarded to City Council for their consideration at their first meeting in February. Discussion ensued on the Three Year Economic Development Plan. Mr. Albinson suggested once again that the planning studies for completion in the next three years be incorporated into the plan. Official Proceedings of the December 16, 1992 Community Development Commission Page -4- Discussion ensued on several other possibilities for inclusion into the three year work plan. Mr. Stock stated that he would also bring the three year economic development plan bring back to the Planning Commission their review and consideration. Mr. Stock stated that the Economic Profile has been completed. Mr. Albinson stated that the piece is very professional and will be very useful in attracting developer interest to the Scott County area. He stated that it is a piece we should be proud of. Mr. Stock stated that the Scott County Economic development Coalition is also planning an economic development day for Friday, May 21, 1993 . Mr. Jim McCoomb from McCoomb & Associates will be the featured speaker. Mr. McCoomb is a market research analyst would has done quite a bit of work in the Scott County area regarding growth. Mr. McCoomb is well respected in the commercial real estate area. Phillips/Van Horn moved to adjourn the meting at 7 : 00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Barry A. Stock Recording Secretary 0 OFFICIAL MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE CABLE COMMUNICATIONS ADVISORY COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 7, 1992 Chairman Anderson called the meeting to order at 6: 00 p.m. with Commissioners Moonen, Bastyr, Anderson and Harrison present. Commission Scannell was absent. Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator and Bill Lepley, SW Audio Visual were also present. Moonen/Harrison moved to approve the minutes of the October 26, 1992 meeting as kept. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting began with a tour of the new City Hall facility. Mr. Stock explained that the installation of the audio/video equipment has been delayed due to the elevator construction. Mr. Stock explained that construction of the elevator was approximately 3 weeks behind due to rock conditions under the elevator pit. Mr. Stock stated that he expected the audio/video installation to be completed in mid January. There was no other business of the Cable Communications Advisory Commission. Moonen/Harrison moved to adjourn the meeting at 6: 30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Barry A. Stock Recording Secretary OFFICIAL MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC ACCESS CORPORATION REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 7, 1992 Chairman Bastyr called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m. with Commissioners Moonen, Bastyr, Anderson, Zeigler and Harrison present. Commission Scannell was absent. Bill Lepley, SW Audio Visual/New Frontier Production Manager were also present. Anderson/Zeigler moved to approve the minutes of the October 26, 1992 meeting as kept. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Zeigler shared with the Corporation the budgets for 1991/1992/1993 . He noted that these budgets have been forwarded to City Council for their information. Discussion ensued on the development of a public access user's survey. Mr. Anderson stated that at the last meeting the possibility of developing a user's survey was discussed. Mr. Anderson stated that several weeks ago he met with Mr. Bastyr and Mr. Stock to discuss possible questions to include in the survey. He noted that he has also been working with someone from the Star Tribune who has quite a bit of experience in market research. The survey as attached is meant as a draft. Discussion ensued on the survey. Mr. Anderson stated that he would incorporate the comments made by the Corporation into the survey and bring back a final draft for their approval prior to distributing the survey. Zeigler/Moonen moved to adjourn the meeting at 7 : 30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Barry A. Stock Recording Secretary *3 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Karen Marty, City Attorney DATE: December 24 , 1992 RE: Trains Blocking Intersections At the last City Council meeting the question arose as to the authority of a train to block an intersection for long periods of time. We do have an ordinance which prohibits that. City Code Section 7 . 11 limits the blockage to ten minutes. It reads as follows: Sec. 7 . 11. Limiting Time of Railway-Street Crossing Obstruction. It is unlawful for any person operating or in charge of a railroad train, car, engine, or other railroad equipment, or combination of such equipment, to permit the same to be parked or left standing upon any street crossing so as to close such crossing to vehicular traffic for a longer period than ten (10) minutes. A violation of this section is a petty misdemeanor unless it endangers life or property (which would be unusual) . The penalty for a petty misdemeanor is a maximum of a $200 fine. Minn. Stat. Sec. 219. 383 contains the same provisions, and but also specifies that there shall be a minimum fine of $25. If you have further questions, please let me know. Signed 3 Karen arty, CaTy Attorney KEM:bjm [23MEMO2] cc: Tom Steininger BUSINESS UPDATE FROM CITY HALL Vol. 7 No. 1 Dear Chamber Member: January I, 1993 City Clerk At their regular meeting on December 15th, City The Scott County Economic Development Coalition Council approved a 3.2 beer license for Sene's Inc. has recently completed a new economic dba Imperial Wok Chinese Restaurant, 237 East 1st development resource profile. The resource profile will he used to promote new development activity Avenue. in Scott County. The marketing piece was On December 15th, City Council adopted the fee produced at no cost to the cities participating in schedule for 1993. Engineering fees for public the Coalition. Funds were generated from ads sold improvements were increased to 7 1/2% of the in the profile to off-set production costs. construction project; impounding fees for animals were increased; and a fee was established for the For those persons participating in the City's rental of the community youth building for other refuse/recycling collection program, Christmas than local youth groups. The park department trees will be collected in Shakopee on the same fees and the municipal swimming pool fees day as your regular refuse between January 11 - usernot increased. January 22. Christmas trees should be place at wereyour regular refuse collection point. The cost to On December 15th, City Council extended the 3% dispose of a Christmas tree is 2 (two) extra service lodging tax for an additional three years. This coupons. Coupons are available at City Hall and money is used to support the Shakopee Convention the License Bureau at the Scott County and Visitors Bureau. Courthouse. Community Development Park and Recreation On December 15, 1992 Council authorized the Ice skating is a popular and excellent winter appropriate City officials to obtain an appraisal for activity that provides for mass participation at a Lots 3 & 4, Block 24, Original Shakopee Plat. The reasonable cost. The City of Shakopee constructs purpose of the appraisal is to determine the fair and maintains five outdoor skating rinks. They market value of the property. The site in question are located at Stans Park, Lions Park, Scenic was formerly known as the Pellham Hotel site. It Heights Park, Hiawatha Park and Holmes Park. At each location there is a shelter building for all is located next to the City parking lot on the N.E. Harm up skaters to put their skates on and t corner of Second Avenue and Lewis Street. Theto City is considering the possibility of acquiring the after being out in the cold. Rink attendants are on property for parking lot purposes. A final decision duty from I p.m. to 7 p.m. on weekends and on this issue is expected in February. weekdays during the Christmas holidays only. • Several years ago. the City of Shakopee was one of The Planning Commission also recommended City the first communities in the metropolitan area to Council approval of an amendment to Interim install push button switches on the outside of the Ordinance No. 322. This amendment would shelter buildings permitting skaters to activate the extend the time restricting the development of lights when there is no rink attendant on duty in approximately 78 acres south of the Senior High the late evening. The lights will automatically School. shut-off for the night at 11 p.m. So far, this system only exists at Stans Park and Scenic Heights Park. Other locations may have them installed by next winter. Public Works The City Council has ordered feasibility reports on Pla111111ia potential 1993 projects. The following reports are being prepared by the Engineering staff: The Shakopee Board of Adjustment and Appeals approved a variance to the side yard setback * Spencer St., 1st Ave. to 9th Ave. requirements for Citizen's State Bank of Shakopee * 8th Ave., Atwood St. to Spencer St. at their meeting on December 3, 1992. This * Webster St., 5th Ave. to 6th Ave. variance was requested in order to construct an * Naumkeag St., 2nd Ave. to 4th Ave. addition onto their drive-through facility and * Filmore St., 3rd Ave. to 4th Ave. install an Automatic Teller Machine. * Atwood St., 4th Ave. to 5th Ave. At their meeting on December 3, 1992, the On December 1st the City Council approved of a Shakopee Planning Commission recommended complete survey of Tahpah Park, including aerial City Council approval of two vacations. The first photography, topography, boundary survey, etc. was the vacation of the east 30 feet of an 80 foot A complete survey of this park has never been wide utility easement. This easement was done and it is needed for the design of any future reserved when the portion of Clay Street between projects. 3rd and 4th Avenue was vacated in 1968. This vacation is being requested by Shakopee Services, Inc. in order to allow the construction of an addition onto the west side of their existing structure. The Planning Commission also recommended approval of the vacation of the remainder of the north one-half of the alley within Block 42, Shakopee Plat. A portion of this alley had been vacated in 1968. This vacation is 1j1 being requested by Admiral Waste Management. friA •& At this same meeting, the Planning Commission AP4PPYKt* also recommended City Council approval of the Final Development Plan for the Milwaukee Manor ` �:_•=;;::° Planned Unit Development. There are 2 lots proposed for single family development within the portion zoned Urban Residential (R-2), and 53 lots C (15 buildings) proposed within the area zoned Mid- Density Residential (R-3). The site covers 9.91 acres and is located east of Market Street and north of 7th Avenue. MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in regular session on November 2 , 1992 at 4 : 30 P .M. in the Utilities meeting room. MEMBERS PRESENT : Commissioners Kirchmeier, Cook and O' Toole . Also Liaison Sweeney, Manager Van Hout and Secretary Menden . Motion by Cook, seconded by O'Toole that the minutes of the September 14, 1992 regular meeting and the October 5 , 1992 regular meeting be approved as kept. Motion carried . Motion by O'Toole, seconded by Cook that the minutes of the October 19 , 1992 meeting of a Committee of the Whole be approved as kept . Motion carried. BILLS READ: City of Shakopee 20 , 032 . 00 ARA/Cory Refreshment Service 78 . 00 Aqua Engineering, Inc . 105 . 00 R .W. Beck and Associates 2 , 322 . 84 Border States Electric Supply 15 , 671 . 90 Champion Auto of Shakopee 57 . 09 City of Shakopee 329 . 52 Clay' s Printing Service 139 . 20 Cooperative Power 36 , 147 . 18 Feed-Rite Controls , Inc . 1 , 925 . 92 General Office Products Company 333 . 79 Glenwood Inglewood 10 . 09 Gopher State One-Call , Inc . 507 . 14 Graybar Electric Company, Inc . 5 , 636 . 44 H & C Electric Supply 35 . 22 Hance Cable Testing and Locating 330 . 90 Hennen' s ICO 8 . 31 Howard Industries, Inc . 32 . 82 Mrs . Howard Krohn 117 . 10 Leef Bros . , Inc . 36 . 12 Ray LeMieux 70 . 32 M-V Gas Co . 8 . 79 Minnesota Valley Testing Laborator1es , Inc . 35 . 00 Motor Parts Service Co . , Inc . 9 . 20 Northern States Power Co . 358 , 153 . 88 Northern States Power Co. 941 . 68 Northern States Power Co. 7 ,854 . 59 Plehal Blacktopping, Inc . 300 . 00 Reach Equipment 1 ,739 . 98 Reynolds Welding Supply Co. 21 . 13 Schoell and Madson, Inc . 450 . 07 Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 178 . 29 Signs of Quality 85 . 20 Al Smith Excavating 1 ,705 . 00 Starks Cleaning Services , Inc . 72 . 42 Dean Struck 70 .80 United Compucred Collections , Inc . 239 . 62 Utilities Telecommunications council 67 . 00 Lou Van Hout 76 . 27 Viking Steel Products , Inc . 98 . 02 Voss Lighting 124 . 92 Water Pro 6 ,006 . 91 Westinghouse Electric Supply co. 1 ,441 . 48 Wheeler Lumber Operations 838 . 58 Yarusso ' s Hardware Co. 27 . 69 Bentz Constructions , Inc . 344 . 00 John McReynolds 719 . 67 National Fire Protection Association 69 . 15 Motion by Cook, seconded by O'Toole that the bills be allowed and ordered paid . Motion carried . Mark Pidde from. the Shakopee-Prior Lake Hockey Association was present to address the Commission regarding reconnecting the electric service to the Valley Ice Arena . It was the concensus of the Commission to reconnect the service for the standard Commercial deposit and bill the kilowatt usage on the standard rate based on their permanently reduced load . Liaison Sweeney gave his report . The status of the Milwaukee Manor Plat was given. The Manager is proceeding with the contract for Automatic Cash Handling, which will be implemented by Jan 1 , 1993 for SPUC customers. Members of the Cross of Peace Lutheran Church were present for the discussion regarding the Watertower and Substation site . The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission engineer Kevin Favaro was also present for the discussion. A report from the Engineers was handed out to the audience partaining to various site options and costs involved . Mr . Favaro cited various criteria for picking a site including economics , aesthetics and flexibility. The Commission held a discussion on whether there were other site options available Motion by Cook, seconded by O'Toole that the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission consider Lot 1 Maple Trails Estate solely for a water tower and exclude the placement of a substation on Lot 2 Maple Trails Estate and also eliminate Alternative 5 and 5A which would be adjacent to that area . Motion by Cook to amend the above motion to include that the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission proceed to procur only for water tower purposes and exclude adjacent 5 and 5a alternatives . Motion to amend seconded by O' Toole . Motion and amendment carried. On discussion on the Motion , Commissioner O'Toole questioned restricted use of public property. The motion now states procurement of the land for purpose of a water tower only. A well is also scheduled for the site . Motion by O'Toole to amend the amendment to the main Motion to indicate that the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission intent is to exclude putting a substation on this property and the include the necessary attachments necessary to the usage of placing a water tower on the described property. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Cook. Commissioner Cook stated that the intent of the Motion is to proceed to procur Lot 1 , Maple Trails Estate for the use of a water tower and other water needs but not put an electrical substation on that lot or on the land indicated on alternative 5 and 5A. Commissioner O' Toole withdrew his motion to amend the amendment to the main Motion . Commissioner Cook withdrew the second . The amendment to the amendment is withdrawn from the table . Motion by O'Toole , seconded by Cook to reconsider the amendment . Motion carried. Motion by Cook , seconded by O'Toole to withdraw the amendment . Motion carried . Motion by Cook, seconded by O'Toole to withdraw the main motion . Motion carried. Motion by Cook, seconded by O'Toole to proceed with procuring Lot 1 , Maple Trails Estate for the purpose of a water tower, well and other water needs for that purpose . Motion carried. Motion by Cook, seconded by O'Toole that the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission do not use Lot 1 & 2 Maple Trails Estate for an electrical substation and also no longer consider alternatives 5 and 5A in R.W. Beck report of Oct 30, 1992 . Motion carried . The Commission directed the Engineer to further evaluate the various other options in the report that look favorable; and to report on his findings at the next regular commission meeting . The budget was discussed . The final budget figures will be brought to the Commission by the December 7 , 1992 regular meeting. Motion by O 'Toole : seconded by Cook to offer Resolution #394 a Resolution Adopting Utility Deposits . Ayes : Commissioners Cook , K?rchmeier and O'Toole . Nayes: none . Resolution passed . Motion carried . Manager Van Hout reported on some problems involved with looking for a fiscal consultant . There were no plats brought before the Manager with any distinctive problems for the month of October, 1992 . There were six fire calls for a total of 7 man hours and 50 minutes for the month of October, 1992 . There were no lost time accidents for October, 1992 . The next regular meeting of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission will be held on December 7 , 1992 at 4 : 30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room . There will be a special meeting of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission on December 15 , 1992 for discussing 1993 wages . Motion by Cook, seconded by O'Toole that the meeting be adjourned . Motion carried . P /I V [OD l Barbara Menden ,. mission Secretary MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in regular session on July 13 , 1992 at - 4 : 30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room . MEMBERS PRESENT : Commissioners Kirchmeier, Cook and O' toole . Also Manager Van Hout , Liaison Sweeney and Secretary Menden. Motion by Cook, seconded by Kirchmeier to approve the minutes of the June 1 , 1992 regular meeting and June 9 , 1992 special meeting and July 2 , 1992 special meeting. Motion carried . An introduction to the Commission of new employee Joseph Adams was done by Manager Van Rout . Liaison Sweeney inquired as to the fixtures at the old Huber Park site . They are to be taken down in the near future . An update was given to the Commission by Manager Van Hout as to the contract with MMPA along with the contract termination to NSP . A request for watermain replacement on 2nd avenue and Atwood Street just east of Scott St. and Scott St . just north of the Railroad tracks was given to the Commission. No estimates for the project had been received at the present time. Motion by O'Toole , seconded by Cook to accept the request from the City of Shakopee to replace the watermain on 2nd Ave . between Atwood St . and Scott St . including to the tracks on Scott St . pending acceptable cost estimates . Motion carried. The status of the land purchase for the new water storage tank was given by Manager Van Hout . Motion by Cook, seconded by Kirchmeier to notify our Engineer Schoell and Madson of the descriptions of the County Road 17 site for the water storage tank and substation and the County Road 18 number one priority site for the water tank and to get exact descriptions and size to us so that we can go to the City to begin condemnation proceedings . Motion carried. An addendum to the power supply study was given to the Commission. Letters have been sent out to Shakopee Public Utilities Commission customers who fall into the criteria for lead and water sampling testing. We need 60 homes for sample points to begin testing. A water connection fee required by the State of Minnesota of $5 . 21 will be on an upcoming water billing. Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Cook to notify Manager Lou Van Hout of an extension .of his contract . Motion carried. There were no new plats for June, 1992 . There were four fire calls for a total man hours of 2 hours and 10 minutes for the month of June , 1992 . There were no loss time accidents for the month of June, 1992 . Motion by O 'Toole , seconded by Cook to recess to 7 : 00 P.M. Motion carried . The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission re-convened at 7 : 00 P .M. in the utilities meeting room, for a joint meeting with the Shakopee City Council . Members present from the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission were: Commissioners Kirchmeier , Cook and O' toole. Also present : Manager Van Hout. Members present from the Shakopee City Council were: Mayor Laurent , Councilpersons Vierling, Sweeney, Beard, Lynch . Also present : D. Kraft , City Administrator; L. Ekola , City Planner; D. Hutton, City Engineer; and Shiela Effertz of the Shakopee Valley News . President Kirchmeier re-convened the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission from the recess . A few items were added to the printed agenda by mutual agreement . Mayor Laurent read City Resolution # 3615 commending the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission and Manager Lou Van Hout . Commissioner Kirchmeier presented a summary of the 1991/92 activities and the goals of the SPUC , which were: reliable service at a reasonable cost to its customers, the maintaining of modern facilities , and a source of revenue to the city. He expressed the need to balance these goals . He advised that a modest increase in electrical costs should be expected in 1992 , reviewed the contribution from the Utilities to the city general fund of $519 ,000 for 1991 . He gave a short review of the new wholesale power supply contract with the MMPA, and the fact that the second feeder from the Blue Lake Substation was near completion . He reviewed the long term goal of watermain reconstruction , done in conjunction with the City' s capital improvement plan, which was estimated at $240 ,000 in 1991 , $230 ,000 in 1992 . A new well is planned in 1993 or 1994 , and a new groundlevel watertank in 1996 estimated at $1 , 500 , 000 . City Administrator Kraft inquired whether or not SPUC had received a copy of the Metropolitan Council ' s study on water resources . Manager Van Hout stated that he did not recall receiving it . Commissioner Kirchmeier reviewed the lona term plans in the electrical area, which were for a new substation to be constructed in 1995 , and distribution system conversion from 4,160 to 12 , 500 volts . Councilperson Sweeney asked if the cashflow of the SPUC contribution to the city general fund could be improved . There is a certain amount sent to the general fund monthly, with the balance of the SPUC contribution is sent at the conclusion of the year . The Commission was assured that any excess contribution could be returned to the Commission if the total of the monthly amounts exceeded the total designated contribution for the year . The consensus of SPUC was to increase the amount sent monthly so as to reduce the balance needed to be sent at the end of the year. The locations of curb boxes and valves in new plats was discussed. The consensus was to have this item reviewed further after more information is available. City Administrator Kraft asked whether the responsibilities of the City and SPUC were clear on streetlighting. Discussion followed. The downtown lighting, and other decorative types of lights gave rise to the need to clarify the responsibilities of the City, SPUC, and developers or homeowners associations . The City Administrator and the Utilities Manager were to meet and get the downtown lighting arrangements on paper, and get the other items into a format for general discussion . Mayor Laurent advised that he had received good coments from people in town about the improvement in the number of electrical outages . Examples of good working arrangements were insurance and vehicle maintenance . The City uses the Hennepin County bid system for standard vehicle purchases . SPUC plans to utilize the City' s purchasing through this arrangement . The review process for new subdivisions and the building permit process was discussed. SPUC staff puts comments on a form sent by the building indpection department prior to issuing a building permit . This is done as a service to the builders to alert them if any problems with electric or water utilities exist . The inspection of water and sewer was discussed . A general discussion of meeting deadlines , and invoice payment . Commissioner Cook explained the need for backup information regarding invioces . Commissioner Kirchmeier discussed the undergrounding of the electric system in the downtown. Property acquisition was discussed . The Commission requested the City Council to process the acquisition of the property needed for watertanks and substation once those sites are determined . The wiring of a hockey rink for general recreation was discussed . The City Attorney will be asked for an opinion about the ability of the SFUC crews to do this sort of work at the request of the City. Motion By Ot Toole : to adjourn, seconded by Cook . Motion carried, Meeting adjourned. ATTEST: a A L,, (474-- Lout anHout , Manager `1 '\ i 1:- , \ '\ r 1 )0v_ .1 Lk, .[ E V , v,--L ..z 7 Barbara Menden , Comrni6sion Secretary A TENTATIVE AGENDA BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Regular Session Shakopee, MN January 7 , 1993 Chairperson William Mars Presiding 1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of Agenda 3 . Approval of December 3 , 1992 , Meeting Minutes 4 . Recognition by Board of Adjustment and Appeals of Interested Citizens. 5. 7 : 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an appeal to the staff ' s interpretation of the City Zoning Ordinance's definition of mobile homes in the Racetrack District. The applicant wishes to use the structure for storage at 2100 Eagle Creek Blvd. Applicant: John Clark Action: Resolution No. 653 6. Other Business a. b. NOTE TO THE B.O.A.A. MEMBERS: 1. If you have any questions or need additional information on any of the above items, please call Terrie or Aggie on the Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting. 2 . If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting. TENTATIVE AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Session Shakopee, MN January 7 , 1993 Chairperson Terry Joos Presiding 1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of Agenda 3 . Approval of the December 3 , 1992 , Meeting Minutes 4 . Recognition by Planning Commission of Interested Citizens. 5. 7 : 40 PUBLIC HEARING: To consider a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a church in Maple Trails Addition, in the R-1 district. Applicant: Cross of Peace Lutheran Church Action: Resolution No. 651 6 . 7 : 50 PUBLIC HEARING: To consider a conditional use permit to allow the operation of a Bed and Breakfast at 134 E. 4th Ave. , in the R-2 district. Applicant: Karen M. Wallerius Action: Resolution No. 652 7 . Sidewalk Requirement: To consider a request to be released from a sidewalk requirement. Applicant: John Albinson Action: Recommendation to City Council 8 . Reviews: A. One Way Sweeping, Inc. - Conditional Use Permit 9 . Other Business A. 1993 Planning Commission Work Program B. Updated PUD Application Packets 10. Adjourn Lindberg S. Ekola City Planner NOTE TO PLANNING MEMBERS: 1. If you have any questions or need additional information on any of the above items, please call Terrie or Aggie on the Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting at 445-3650. 2 . If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting. A 3490 Lexington Avenue North St. Paul,MN 55126 League of Minnesota Cities (612)490-5600 December 21, 1992 Dear City Clerk: The Conference for Newly Elected Officials is scheduled for Saturday, January 30 at the Sheraton Park Place Hotel. As many of you know, this conference is a must for city officials as they begin their new role in city government. A brochure is enclosed outlining the program, and includes a registration form for the conference, in addition to a hotel registration form. Sat . , Jan.30th, 8 : OOam-4: 30pm Also enclosed is a brochure describing two pre-conference seminars that will benefit both incumbents and newly elected officials. Offered by Government Training Service (GTS) and Women in City Government, these programs are conveniently scheduled on Friday, January 29 at the same hotel. We encourage your city officials to attend the special full-day GTS seminar titled, "When the Same Old Way Isn't Working Anymore. " The focus of this practical and timely program is on the role of the policymaker in the change process and the skills needed to make positive change happen. Friday, January 29th 9 : 00 am-4: 30 pm On Friday evening, Women in City Government will sponsor a seminar on "Personal Effectiveness Under Pressure--Escape, Energize and Excel." Learn the three uncommon keys to being your best in a world of non-stop pressure. Friday, January 29th 7 :00 pm-9 : 15 pm We would appreciate your assistance in distributing these brochures to your city's officials. Brochures have been sent directly to the newly elected officials. On behalf of the League of Minnesota Cities and Government Training Service, we send you our best wishes in the new year. Sincerely, 74/a' z t( qfri ecv<--- Cam Andre Helene Johnson Interim Executive Director Executive Director League of Minnesota Cities Government Training Service LOCATION: Sheraton Park Place Hotel , 5555 Wayzata Boulevard, St . Louis Park, MN. (at Hwys 394 and 100) CI MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Karen Marty, City Attorney DATE: December 29, 1992 RE: Second Avenue Assessment Appeals We presently have 8 or 9 appeals on Second Avenue special assessments. The next step in preparing for trial is to obtain before and after appraisals for the parcels, to determine whether they really did increase in value (i. e. "benefit") from the improvements. George Hoff has contacted Richard Marks to perform these appraisals. Mr. Marks is willing to do them for $800 per parcel , which is a fair price. Peter Patchin (who said he simply was too busy to handle these) charged us $4100 for the 5 benefit appraisals he did on parcels back when we started this project, or about $820 per parcel. To the extent these cases can be settled for an amount less than $800, it would be economical to do so. Otherwise, we will proceed with appraisals on all parcels. Trial testimony will cost $75 per hour, for a total expected between $9, 000 and $10, 000. This is FYI . i.1 Signed --i' Karen Ma y, City Attorney t KEM:bjm [29MEMO] cc: Dennis Kraft 410 MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Building Dept. Workload - Non Agenda Info DATE: December 30 , 1992 Several weeks ago I informed you of my decision to retain the services of our Temporary Building Inspector position. To provide you with a better understanding of the building department staff needs, I have prepared a work list which identifies tasks to be completed by the Building Department in early 1993 . BUILDING INSPECTION WORK LIST - 1993 1. Process new building permit applications, plan reviews, etc. 2 . Answer inquiries, perform inspections of current projects - and follow-up on old permits requiring final inspections - see Attachment A. 3 . Answer inquiries, work with designers on elements of design for proposed projects - see Attachment B. 4 . Research, analyze and discuss code issues to maintain uniform application. 5. Take photographs of all new buildings. 6. Clean out old files, go through basement (early 1993) before moving. 7 . Evaluate code book library, update, re-order as necessary to comply with current laws. 8. Evaluate stamps, update, re-order as necessary to comply with current code. 9. Evaluate handout material, create, modify, update as necessary. 10. Evaluate permit fees, survey other communities, make changes for next fee schedule. 11. Review city ordinances in areas enforced by building department. Propose changes as necessary. 12 . Enforce RPZ (reduced pressure zone) backflow preventer law. Coordinate with SPUC to ensure city-wide compliance. 13 . Perform liquor license inspections per City Code. 14 . Perform bleacher inspections per City Code. 15. Attend developer pre-application and miscellaneous meetings. 16. Complete staff reviews of CUP's and platting process, etc. from Planning Department. 17. Attend training and schooling as required by State law to maintain building official certification. 18 . Respond to change of occupancy inquiries, inspections, investigations. 19 . Perform housing inspections when requested by landlords or tenants. 20. Respond to various City Code complaints/violations. Assist Planning Department by performing field inspections/investigations, taking pictures, etc. 21. Investigate work done without permit - develop system through County Assessor to track (basement finishing, e 22 . Resolve problem situations: a. Stagecoach area. b. Abandoned house - Eaglewood. c. Moved house - Marschall Road - no building permit or progress. d. Fire damaged house - Tyler Street. e. Tattoo parlor. f. SAC and WAC disputes. g. Parish Center - final inspection, dispute over doors. h. East Shakopee Avenue - landlord code violations. i. East Thirteenth Avenue - landlord code violations. j . Marschall Road - abandoned farm dumping complaint. k. Hilldale Drive - neighbor complaints and work without permit. 1. Residential use of pole building - Muhlenhardt Road. Please note that the work list above grows larger during the warmer weather when plan reviews and inspections take up virtually all available time. Unlike tdepartments, accomplish worked. Therefore, the onlyoppruntYto muh of the above during the "off peak" months. 12/15/92 Attachment A HOUSING PERMITS FOOTING FRAME PLUMBING COND. CO FINAL CO PERMIT ft PID # INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE 9375 27-163015-0 FJS FJS FJS C. I. Realty 7,33 Roundho,se Circle 03/31/92 05/06/92 06/23/92 9380 27-160001-0 FJS FJS JTG FJS Novak Fleck 1112 Dakota Street 04/01/92 04/14/92 05/14/92 10/28/92 9424 27-163010-0 FJS JTG FJS JTG C. I. Realty, Inc. 1454 Roundhouse Circle 04/27/92 06/05/92 06/23/92 07/10/92 9430 27-139006-0 FJS FJS FJS FJS R.S.M. Homes 2093 Pike Lake Road 04/30/92 05/26/92 06/25/92 06/25/92 9440 27-158019-0 FJS JIG Logeais Homes 979 Goldenrod Lane 05/04/92 07/09/92 9464 27-160020-0 FJS FJS JTG FJS Novak Fleck 807 Larkspur Court 05/27/92 06/10/92 07/08/92 07/13/92 9473 27-163009-0 FJS JTG JTG JTG C. 1. Realty 1446 Roundhouse Circle 06/02/92 07/29/92 11/24/92 11/30/92 i 9473 27-163009-0 FJS JTG JIG JIG C. I. Realty 1450 Roundhouse Circle 06/02/92 07/28/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 9454 27-138009-0 FJS FJS FJS Michael Benjamin Homes 1213 Sunflower Circle 06/11/92 09/01/92 11/06/92 1 9;85 27-163017-0 FJS JTG JTG FJS C. I. Realty 1512 Roundhouse Circle 06/12/92 07/21/92 08/14/92 08/21/92 986 27-163017-0 FJS JIG JTG JIG C. 1. Real:y 1516 Roundhouse Circle 06/12/92 07/21/92 11/24/92 12/01/92 9511 27-160024-0 FJS JIG Novak Fleck 808 Larkspur Court 06/18/92 07/01/92 95-1 27-168016-0 FJS JIG Laurent Builders 1193 Polk Street 07/10/92 07/30/92 9551 27-010023-0 FJS JTG Mark Miller 585 Main Street 07/15/92 10/12/92 0566 27-163006-0 :I'S `:S C. I. Realty 1525 Roundhouse Circle 07/29/92 12/03/92 9566 27-163006-0 :TG FJS C. I. Realty 1529 Roundhouse Circle 07/28/92 12/03/92 9570 27-138013-0 JTG FJS FJS FJS n7/30. 2 C9/"C:02 1:123/92 1C/28/02 .. F. C;. - 3:0 Prairie L3re HOUSING PERMITS FOOTING FRAME PLUMBING COND. CO FINAL CO PERMIT # PID # INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE 9572 27-158031-0 JTG JIG FJS FJS Logeais Homes 902 Goldenrod Lane 07/30/92 09/02/92 10/01/92 10/01/92 9575 27-170026-0 FJS JTG Detail Home Bldrs. 1297 Heritage Drive 08/03/92 08/24/92 9576 27-170010-0 FJS FJS Detail Home Bldrs. 1298 Heritage Drive 08/17/92 10/22/92 9582 27-160027-0 FJS FJS FJS FJS Novak fleck 1227 Dakota Street 08/05/92 08/26/92 11/06/92 11/18/92 9598 27-166009-0 FJS W. F. Construction 1173 Shawmut Street 08/21/92 9601 27-142011-0 FJS FJS Laurent Builders 1057 Stonebrooke Drive 08/20/92 10/19/92 9610 27-165031-0 FJS FJS JTG JTG David A. Williams Const. 783 Cortland Circle 09/03/92 10/14/92 11/19/92 11/23/92 9620 27-145047-0 FJS FJS FJS JTG Logeais Homes 1251 Sapphire Lane 08/31/92 10/12/92 12/01/92 12/03/92 9621 27-169005-0 FJS FJS FJS FJS Novak Fleck 1017 Aster Lane 09/01/92 09/15/92 10/22/92 10/29/92 9622 27-169004-0 FJS FJS FJS FJS Novak Fleck 997 Aster Lane 09/01/92 09/17/92 10/23/92 10/29/92 9623 27-169003-0 FJS FJS FJS FJS Novak Fleck 977 Aster Lane 09/02/92 09/18/92 10/21/92 10/29/92 9637 27-160028-0 FJS FJS Logeais Homes 1108 Goldenrod Lane 09/10/92 11/18/92 9642 27-165027-0 FJS FJS JTG JTG Gerold Bros. Const. 926 Carriage Circle 09/18/92 11/06/92 11/25/92 11/27/92 9643 27-169011-0 FJS FJS FJS FJS Novak Fleck 1255 Sage Lane 09/10/92 09/22/92 10/22/92 10/29/92 9648 27-166001-0 FJS Monnens Custom Bldrs. 1206 Prairie Lane 09/18/92 9649 27-171001-0 FJS Date Dahlke 1852 E. Vierling Drive 09/22/92 9649 27-171002-0 FJS FJS Dale Dahlke 1856 E. Vierling Drive 09/22/92 12/02/92 Attachment A 12/15/92 HOUSING PERMITS FOOTING FRAME PLUMBING COND. CO FINAL CO PERMIT # PID # INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE 9375 27-163015-0 FJS FJS FJS C. I. Realty 1498 Roundhouse Circle 03/31/92 05/06/92 06/23/92 9380 27-160001-0 FJS FJS JTG FJS Novak Fleck 1112 Dakota Street 04/01/92 04/14/92 05/14/92 10/28/92 9424 27-163010-0 FJS JTG FJS JTG C. I. Realty, Inc. 1454 Roundhouse Circle 04/27/92 06/05/92 06/23/92 07/10/92 9430 27-139006-0 FJS FJS FJS FJS R.S.M. Homes 2093 Pike Lake Road 04/30/92 05/26/92 06/25/92 06/25/92 9440 27-158019-0 FJS JTG Logeais Homes 979 Goldenrod Lane 05/04/92 07/09/92 9464 27-160020-0 FJS FJS JTG FJS Novak Fleck 807 Larkspur Court 05/27/92 06/10/92 07/08/92 07/13/92 9473 27-163009-0 FJS JTG JTG JTG C. I. Realty 1446 Roundhouse Circle 06/02/92 07/29/92 11/24/92 11/30/92 9473 27-163009-0 FJS JTG JTG JTG C. I. Realty 1450 Roundhouse Circle 06/02/92 07/28/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 9484 27-138009-0 FJS FJS FJS Michael Benjamin Homes 1213 Sunflower Circle 06/11/92 09/01/92 11/06/92 9486 27-163017-0 FJS JTG JTG FJS C. I. Realty 1512 Roundhouse Circle 06/12/92 07/21/92 08/14/92 08/21/92 9486 27-163017-0 FJS JTG JTG JTG C. I. Realty 1516 Roundhouse Circle 06/12/92 07/21/92 11/24/92 12/01/92 9511 27-160024-0 FJS JTG Novak Fleck 808 Larkspur Court 06/18/92 07/01/92 9541 27-168016-0 FJS JIG Laurent Builders 1193 Polk Street 07/10/92 07/30/92 9551 27-010023-0 FJS JTG Mark Miller 585 Main Street 07/15/92 10/12/92 9566 27-163006-0 JTG FJS C. I. Realty 1525 Roundhouse Circle 07/29/92 12/03/92 9566 27-163006-0 JTG FJS C. I. Realty 1529 Roundhouse Circle 07/28/92 12/03/92 9570 27-138013-0 JTG FJS FJS FJS W. F. Construction 1300 Prairie Lane 07/30/92 09/10/92 10/23/92 10/28/92 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PERMITS FINAL CO PERMIT # PID INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE 9704 27-001303-0 Greystone Construction 714 West 3rd Avenue 9711 27-105001-0 Howe Company 7632 Hwy 101 9713 27-907020-0 Kraus Anderson 1335 East 10th Avenue 9719 27-144002-0 Ford Development 539 Citation Drive 9725 27-910005-0 Building Restoration 889 Valley Park Drive 9728 27-918011-4 Betaseed, Inc. 1788 Marschall Road 9738 27-904006-0 CertainTeed Corp. 3303 East 4th Avenue 9739 27-001108-0 Allen Plaisted 835 West 1st Avenue 9743 Valleyfair One Valleyfair Drive 9752 27-902023-0 Model Stone Compancy 6800 Hwy 101 9757 27-910005-0 Stahl Construction Co. 889 Valley Park Drive 9770 Valleyfair One Valleyfair Drive DECK PERMITS FINAL CO PID INSPECTOR PERMIT # DATE NAME ADDRESS 9360 27-060010-0 Bob Hinkel 2063 Bridge Crossing 9396 27-145046-0 Scott LaCourse 1261 Sapphire Lane 9403 27-919003-0 Ralph Christensen 2300 Marschall Road 9427 27-143027-0 Nark Nysted 1308 Pondview Court 9436 27-131082-0 Gerald uawrzyniak 2660 Emerald Lane 9444 27-138028-0 Dean Gillespie 1304 E. 11th Avenue 9448 27-136037-0 Signature Landscape 624 E. 11th Avenue 9449 27-145028-0 Kevin Siegle 1900 Granite Drive 9460 27-128001-1 Gary Vreeman 1603 Roundhouse Circle 9461 27-133053-0 Michael Thompson 2110 Heritage Drive 9463 27-150013-0 Donald Lundgren 1223 Clover Court 9483 27-133059-0 Jennie Dinsmore 1940 Heritage Drive 9487 27-150027-0 Randal Notermann 1302 Minnesota Street 9500 27-906083-0 Maynard King 527 E. 8th Avenue 9506 27-133010-0 Allen Barnard 1929 Heritage Drive 9514 27-913042-0 dribble 8963 Boiling Sorincs Ln. 956 27- 52:17-2 David Moore 9=� Golden-od Lane REMODEL PERMITS FINAL CO PID INSPECTOR PERMIT # DATE NAME ADDRESS 9319 27-001831-0 David Makis 520 E. 3rd Avenue 9322 27-125002-0 D. M. Huss Construction 930 Dakota Street 9324 27-150023-0 Novak Fleck 1303 Minnesota Street 9332 27-017067-0 Richard Ellingboe 664 South Monroe Street 9340 27-034031-0 Darryl Hoffman 1054 Swift Street 9347 27-908046-0 Armin Koepp 2649 Hauer Trail 9351 27-122011-0 Patrick Lebens 1216 Limestone Drive 9366 27-142045-0 Francis Menden 2544 Lakeview Drive 9404 27-122009-0 Michael Thompson 1192 Limestone Drive 9416 27-162006-0 New Century Const. 630 East 5th Avenue 9417 27-145048-0 New Century Const. 1241 Sapphire Lane 9447 27-033006-0 Ron Menke 955 So. Market 9451 27-046006-0 Sandra Olson 2166 Park Ridge Drive 9452 27-001360-0 Daniel Lang 333 South Lewis Street 9454 27-002041-0 Rick Macklin 928 Sommerville Street 9470 27.012097-0 G. F. Jueroens 1026 Scott Street ,Pct 27-150015-D .cy Garcia 1223 Clover Curt DECK PERMITS FINAL CO PERMIT # PID INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE 9521 27-131022-0 Brian Dose 1286 Limestone Drive 9532 27-147005-0 Connie Schmidt 1300 Pondview Court 9543 27-133001-0 Dennis O'Brien 1208 Sapphire Lane 9562 27-121008-0 Cletus Link 1216 Jefferson St. 9574 27-065004-0 Rick Sames 1164 Merrifield Ct. 9579 27-158004-0 Mike Etzell 1023 Goldenrod Lane 9583 27-160032-0 J. Patrick Hughes 1147 Goldenrod Lane 9585 27-052003-0 Rick Sames Const. 1833 E. 10th Avenue 9594 27-138017-0 Joe Young 1122 Prairie Court 09/24/92 9609 27-145005-0 Joel Straight 1248 Ruby Lane 9618 27-145039-0 Paul Rosenlund 1813 Granite Drive 9630 27-024106-0 Mark Huge 1110 Quincy 9645 27-158033-0 Ron Rymer 1108 Dakota Street 9753 27-150003-0 Ricky Meyer 1153 Clover Court DECK PERMITS FINAL CO PERMIT # PID INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE 9360 27-060010-0 Bob Hinkel 2063 Bridge Crossing 9396 27-145046-0 Scott LaCourse 1261 Sapphire Lane 9403 27-919003-0 Ralph Christensen 2300 Marschall Road 9427 27-143027-0 Mark Nysted 1308 Pondview Court 9436 27-131082-0 Gerald Wawrzyniak 2660 Emerald Lane 9444 27-138028-0 Dean Gillespie 1304 E. 11th Avenue 9448 27-136037-0 Signature Landscape 624 E. 11th Avenue 9449 27-145028-0 Kevin Siegle 1900 Granite Drive 9460 27-128001-1 Gary Vreeman 1603 Roundhouse Circle 9461 27-133053-0 Michael Thompson 2110 Heritage Drive 9463 27-150013-0 Donald Lundgren 1223 Clover Court 9483 27-133059-0 Jennie Dinsmore 1940 Heritage Drive 9487 27-150027-0 Randal Notermann 1302 Minnesota Street 9500 27-906083-0 Maynard King 527 E. 8th Avenue 9506 27-133010-0 Allen Barnard 1929 Heritage Drive 9514 27-913042-0 John Pribble 8963 Boiling Springs Ln. 9516 27-158017-0 David Moore 949 Goldenrod Lane REMODEL PERMITS FINAL CO PERMIT # P1D INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE 9513 27-019014-0 Michael Bruels 953 Shumway Street 9549 27-058016-0 King Homes 532 McDevitt Street 9561 27-145027-0 New Century Const. 1816 Granite Drive 9571 27-004004-0 Charles Breeggemann 617 East 1st Avenue 9586 27-021032-0 Robert Jasper 948 So. Pierce Street 9587 27-092033-0 Brian Call 850 Prairie Street 9596 27-018014-0 Robert Leghorn 940 S. Main Street 9632 27-021023-0 Richard Sames 932 So. Clay 9647 27-010023-0 Mark Miller 585 Main Street 9695 27-001360-0 Daniel Lang 333 So. Lewis 9707 27-063022-0 Monnens Custom Bldrs. 1608 Jackson Court 9712 27-907004-0 Banitt Construction 1461 C. R. 79 9727 27-001400-0 Ozmun Builders 338 E. 4th Avenue 9737 27-050007-0 North Star Services 2032 Eaglewood Circle 9756 27-160025-0 Paul Pfeiffer 804 Larkspur Court 9759 27-083044-0 Daryl Uhrhammer 1160 Menke Circle REMODEL PERMITS FINAL CO PERMIT # PID INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE 9319 27-001831-0 David Makis 520 E. 3rd Avenue 9322 27-125002-0 D. M. Huss Construction 930 Dakota Street 9324 27-150023-0 Novak Fleck 1303 Minnesota Street 9332 27-017067-0 Richard Ellingboe 664 South Monroe Street 9340 27-034031-0 Darryl Hoffman 1054 Swift Street 9347 27-908046-0 Armin Koepp 2649 Hauer Trail 9351 27-122011-0 Patrick Lebens 1216 Limestone Drive 9366 27-142045-0 Francis Menden 2544 Lakeview Drive 9404 27-122009-0 Michael Thompson 1192 Limestone Drive 9416 27-162006-0 New Century Const. 630 East 5th Avenue 9417 27-145048-0 New Century Const. 1241 Sapphire Lane 9447 27-033006-0 Ron Menke 955 So. Market 9451 27-046006-0 Sandra Olson 2166 Park Ridge Drive 9452 27-001360-0 Daniel Lang 333 South Lewis Street 9454 27-002041-0 Rick Macklin 928 Sommerville Street 9470 27-012097-0 G. F. Juergens 1026 Scott Street 9498 27-150015-0 Troy Garcia 1228 Clover Court GARAGE PERMITS FINAL CO PERMIT # PID INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE 9393 27-152007-0 Daniel Barber 648 Hillwood Drive 9413 27-033011-0 Robert Annen 905 Minnesota Street 9420 27-012013-0 Calvin Anderson 826 Scott Street 9437 27-924004-2 James Rognlie 2360 Muhlenhart Road 9456 27-083010-0 Todd Doege 560 Hennes Avenue 9478 27-145048-0 Bayne Olson 1241 Sapphire Lane 9482 27-133048-0 Jasper Homes 2147 Murphy Avenue 9520 27-004127-0 Ed Gay 1011 East 3rd Avenue 9530 27-098010-0 J. Fox Construction 1278 Maxine Circle 9552 27-915035-0 Harlan Haworth 5380 Eagle Creek Blvd. 9556 27-915020-0 Bruce Hennen 4731 Eagle Creek Blvd. 9564 27-083040-0 Bonnie Hennes 1165 Menke Circle 9567 27-004004-0 Charles Breecoemann 617 East 1st Avenue 9568 27-918003-0 Anthony Kervina 1752 Marschall Road 9569 27-140003-0 Can YarU550 405 E. County Road 72 9595 27-145049-0 David Anton 1908 Granite Drive 9602 27-008007-0 Roger Ruff 630 E. 7th Avenue ;633 27-145017-0 ;at Gustafson 1821 Ruby Circle GARAGE PERMITS FINAL CO PERMIT # PID INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE 9634 27-125003-0 Jeff Graham 926 Dakota Street 9655 27-001724-0 Leslie Crowley 725 Atwood Street 9668 27-059004-0 Chuck Boeke 2027 Hilldale Drive 9678 27-158033-0 David Brick 1108 Dakota Street 9693 27-913037-0 Ronald Paschke 8786 Boiling Springs Lane 9696 27-056006-0 Ronald Larson 2084 Bridge Spur 9703 27-918009-1 Roger Fischer 2051 Marschall Road 9714 27-111001-0 Wilton Peterson 1705 W. 3rd Avenue 9714 27-111001-0 Wilton Peterson 1705 West 3rd Avenue 9716 27-058005-0 Richard Hennes 1040 S. Pierce Street 9729 27-913031-0 0. Jerome Johnson 9230 Boiling Springs Lane 9771 27-932010-1 E 8 G Builders 1695 East C. R. 72 GARAGE PERMITS FINAL CO PERMIT # PID INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE 9393 27-152007-0 Daniel Barber 648 Hillwood Drive 9413 27-033011-0 Robert Annen 905 Minnesota Street 9420 27-012013-0 Calvin Anderson 826 Scott Street 9437 27-924004-2 James Rognlie 2360 Muhlenhart Road 9456 27-083010-0 Todd Doege 560 Hennes Avenue 9478 27-145048-0 Wayne Olson 1241 Sapphire Lane 9482 27-133048-0 Jasper Homes 2147 Murphy Avenue 9520 27-004127-0 Ed Gay 1011 East 3rd Avenue 9530 27-098010-0 J. Fox Construction 1278 Maxine Circle 9552 27-915035-0 Harlan Haworth 5380 Eagle Creek Blvd. 9556 27-915020-0 Bruce Hennen 4731 Eagle Creek Blvd. 9564 27-083040-0 Bonnie Hennes 1165 Menke Circle 9567 27-004004-0 Charles Breeggemann 617 East 1st Avenue 9568 27-918003-0 Anthony Kervina 1752 Marschall Road 9569 27-140003-0 Dan Yarusso 405 E. County Road 72 9595 27-145049-0 David Anton 1908 Granite Drive 9602 27-008007-0 Roger Ruff 630 E. 7th Avenue 9633 27-145017-0 Pat Gustafson 1821 Ruby Circle C0MMERC1AL/1NDUSTR:AL PERMITS FINAL CO PID INSPECTOR PERMIT # DATE NAME ADDRESS 9317 27-001032-0 Diamond 5 Wrecking 321-333 East 1st Avenue 9320 27-004154-0 Innovative Bldg. Concepts 1206 E. 1st Avenue 9335 27-901008-0 Suburban SewerE.Service 7802 Highway 101 9378 Valleyfair One Valleyfair Drive 9382 27-004105-0 Jerry Morehouse 911 E. 1st Avenue 9399 27-076001-0 Ryan Company, Inc. 901 Canterbury Road 9412 27-093001-0 T. J. Olson Town Square-1st Ave. Pet 9414 27-001149-0 E. L. Prahm Builders 140 South Holmes St. 9418 27-103001-0 Griggs Contracting 6340 Hwy 101 9434 27-076001-0 K-Mart 901 Canterbury Road 9435 27-001044-0 Kusske Construction 111, 329, 201, 211 1st Ave 9458 27-093001-0 Suburban Propane 1138 Shakopee Town Sq. 9496 27-080002-0 LeRoy Menke Clifton 1st Addition 95D1 27-001115-0 T. E. Ibberson 800 West 1st Avenue 9502 27-142009-0 Stonebrooke Golf Club 2572 Lakeview Drive 9507 27-081012-0 .':,;and uaas 701 Canterbury Road 95::= 27-c3-^;4.3 Richard Logeais 3364 Marschall Road COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PERMITS FINAL CO PERMIT # PID INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE 9517 27-001115-0 T. E. Ibberson 800 West 1st Avenue 9540 Lyman Development Heritage Place 4th Addn. 9550 27-904006-0 Certainteed Corp. 3303 E. 4th Avenue 9577 27-054001-0 Minnesota P & H 4108 Valley Ind. Blvd. N. 9578 27-054001-0 Minnesota P & H 4108 Valley Ind. Blvd. N. 9590 27-902023-0 Model Stone Co. 6801 Hwy. 101 9591 27-055005-0 Jack Brambilla 550 Valley Park Drive 9604 27-912039-0 Morcon Construction Shakopee Public Schools 9606 27-905007-0 Greystone Construction 1803 Eagle Creek Blvd. 9607 27-165038-0 Beckrich Development Beckrich Park Estates 9614 27-068003-0 Earl Weikle & Sons 287 Marschall Road 9635 27-004050-0 McGough Construction 738 E. 1st Avenue 9638 27-001158-0 City of Shakopee 129 S. Holmes 9653 27-910005-0 Stahl Construction 889 Valley Park Drive 9654 27-001199-0 Greystone Construction 300 East 1st Avenue 9661 27-001181-0 Robert Jasper 124 Sommerville St. 9662 Rice Lake Contracting 6949 Highway 101 9669 27-001115-0 T. E. Ibberson 800 West 1st Avenue COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PERMITS FINAL CO PERMIT # PID INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE 9317 27-001032-0 Diamond 5 Wrecking 321-333 East 1st Avenue 9320 27-004154-0 Innovative Bldg. Concepts 1206 E. 1st Avenue 9335 27-901008-0 Suburban Sewer Service 7802 E. Highway 101 9378 Valleyfair One Valleyfair Drive 9382 27-004105-0 Jerry Morehouse 911 E. 1st Avenue 9399 27-076001-0 Ryan Company, Inc. 901 Canterbury Road 9412 27-093001-0 T. J. Olson Town Square-1st Ave. Pet 9414 27-001149-0 E. L. Prahm Builders 140 South Holmes St. 9418 27-103001-0 Griggs Contracting 6340 Hwy 101 9434 27-076001-0 K-Mart 901 Canterbury Road 9435 27-001044-0 Kusske Construction 111, 329, 201, 211 1st Ave 9458 27-093001-0 Suburban Propane 1138 Shakopee Town Sq. 9496 27-080002-0 LeRoy Menke Clifton 1st Addition 9501 27-001115-0 T. E. Ibberson 800 West 1st Avenue 9502 27-142009-0 Stonebrooke Golf Club 2572 Lakeview Drive 9507 27-081012-0 Roland Haas 701 Canterbury Road 9509 27-930004-3 Richard Logeais 3364 Marschall Road HOUSING PERMITS FOOTING FRAME PLUMBING COND. CO FINAL CO PERMIT # PIO # INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE 9734 27-169007-0 JTG JTG Novak Fleck 1057 Aster Lane 11/05/92 12/02/92 9740 27-169028-0 JTG JTG Novak Fleck 1443 Sage Court 11/05/92 12/01/92 9741 27-169026-0 JTG Novak Fleck 1403 Sage Lane 11/16/92 9742 27-139002-0 JTG H & M Builders 7220 Eagle Creek Blvd. 11/16/92 9749 27-169021-0 FJS Novak Fleck 1303 Sage Lane 11/16/92 9751 27-169022-0 JTG Novak Fleck 1323 Sage Lane 11/17/92 9760 27-064010-0 FJS T & D Homes 2015 Foothill Trail 12/03/92 9761 27-170004-0 FJS Detail Home Bldrs. 1208 Heritage Drive East 11/23/92 9762 27-170024-0 JTG Detail Home Bldrs. 1257 Heritage Drive East 11/23/92 9764 27-142010-0 FJS Laurent Builders 1097 Stonebrooke Drive 11/23/92 9765 27-138005-0 Julik & Adler Const. 1200 Sunflower Circle 9773 27-097023-0 Monnens Custom Bldrs. 443 So. Market Street hOUS1NG PERMITS FOOTING FRAME PLUMBING COND. CO FINAL CO PERMIT # PID >Y INSPECTOR iNS=ECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE :ATE DATE DATE DATE 9649 27-171003-0 FJS Dale Dahlke 1860 E. Vierling Drive 09/22/92 9649 27-171004-0 FJS Dale Dahlke 1864 E. Vierling Dr. 09/22/92 965127-169047-0 FJS FJS FJS Novak Fleck 748 Dakota Circle 09/15/92 10/23/92 11/23/92 9559 27-163018-0 JTG C. 1 Rea;ty 1520 Roundhouse Circle 12/01/92 5559 27-163018-0 JIG C. 1. Realty 1524 Roundhouse Circle 12/01/92 9660 27-163007-0 FJS C. I. Realty 1533 Roundhouse Circle 12/02/92 9650 27-163007-0 FJS C. 1. Realty 1537 Roundhouse Circle 12/02/92 9555 27-166016-0 FJS FJS James Fox 1204 Tumbleweed Circle 09/23/92 10/26/92 9565 27-169041-0 FJS FJS FJS Novak Fleck 993 Primrose Lane 09/23/92 10/19/92 11/25/92 9667 27-169006-0 FJS FJS FJS FJS Novak Fleck 1037 Aster Lane 09/24!92 10/13/92 11/18/92 11/23/92 9672 27-158011-0 FJS Logeais Homes 964 E. 11th Avenue 09/25/92 9675 27-142008-0 JTG FJS Laurent Builders 2654 Lakeview Drive 10/01/92 11/13/92 9681 27-169042-0 FJS J7G David Schmitt Const. 973 Primrose Lane 10/05/92 11/05/92 95.,a2 27-169040-0 FJS FJS David Schmitt Const. 1013 Primrcse Lane 10/09/92 11/20/92 9685 27-168026-0 FJS FJS JTG Laurent Builders 1113 Polk Street 10/09/92 11/06/92 12/02/92 9586 27-168007-0 FJS JTG Laurent Builders 1144 Polk Street 10/09/92 11!09/92 96E7 27.166018.0 FJS JTG Allan Thomas Homes 1224 Tumbleweed Circle 10/13/92 11/10/92 HOUSING PERMITS FOOTING FRAME PLUMBING COND. CO FINAL CO PERMIT # PID # INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE 9689 27-165021-0 FJS G. F. Juergens 803 Barrington Drive 10/28/92 9690 27-169012-0 FJS Logeias Homes 1275 Sage Lane 10/22/92 9691 27-169019-0 FJS Logeais Homes 1278 Sage Lane 10/21/92 9692 27-166015-0 JTG Marty Vavrosky 1194 Tumbleweed Circle 10/16/92 9697 27-166017-0 FJS David Clough 1214 Tumbleweed Circle 10/23/92 9699 27-169016-0 FJS FJS Novak Fleck 976 Aster Lane 10/15/92 11/12/92 9700 27-169032-0 FJS JTG FJS Novak Fleck 1074 Primrose Lane 10/19/92 11/05/92 12/02/92 9701 27-169033-0 FJS JTG Novak Fleck 1322 Sage Lane 10/19/92 11/16/92 9702 27-165007-0 FJS David Schmitt Const. 643 Barrington Drive 10/26/92 9709 27-169039-0 FJS FJS T. C. Construction 1033 Primrose Lane 10/27/92 11/24/92 9710 27-169017-0 FJS FJS Drake Construction 1036 Aster Lane 10/26/92 11/17/92 9721 27-168013-0 JTG JTG Laurent Builders 1945 W. 11th Avenue 11/05/92 12/01/92 9722 27-168012-0 FJS JIG Laurent Builders 1104 Polk Street 11/04/92 11/24/92 9730 27-170025-0 FJS Detail Home Bldrs. 1277 Heritage Dr. East 11/13/92 9731 27-170009-0 FJS Detail Home Bldrs. 1278 Heritage Dr. East 11/13/92 9732 27-165033-0 JTG Ozmun Builders 744 Cortland Circle 11/05/92 9733 27-168009-0 FJS Laurent Builders 1128 Polk Street 11/24/92 HOUSING PERMITS FOOTING FRAME PLUMBING COND. CO FINAL CO PERMIT # PID # INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR NAME ADDRESS DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE 9649 27-171003-0 FJS Dale Dahlke 1860 E. Vierling Drive 09/22/92 9649 27-171004-0 FJS Dale Dahlke 1864 E. Vierling Dr. 09/22/92 9651 27-169047-0 FJS FJS FJS Novak Fleck 748 Dakota Circle 09/15/92 10/23/92 11/23/92 9659 27-163018-0 JTG C. I. Realty 1520 Roundhouse Circle 12/01/92 9659 27-163018-0 JTG C. I. Realty 1524 Roundhouse Circle 12/01/92 9660 27-163007-0 FJS C. I. Realty 1533 Roundhouse Circle 12/02/92 9660 27-163007-0 FJS C. I. Realty 1537 Roundhouse Circle 12/02/92 9665 27-166016-0 FJS FJS James Fox 1204 Tumbleweed Circle 09/23/92 10/26/92 9666 27-169041-0 FJS FJS FJS Novak Fleck 993 Primrose Lane 09/23/92 10/19/92 11/25/92 9667 27-169006-0 FJS FJS FJS FJS Novak Fleck 1037 Aster Lane 09/24/92 10/13/92 11/18/92 11/23/92 9672 27-158011-0 FJS Logeais Homes 964 E. 11th Avenue 09/25/92 9675 27-142008-0 JTG FJS Laurent Builders 2684 Lakeview Drive 10/01/92 11/13/92 9681 27-169042-0 FJS JTG David Schmitt Const. 973 Primrose Lane 10/05/92 11/05/92 9682 27-169040-0 FJS FJS David Schmitt Const. 1013 Primrose Lane 10/09/92 11/20/92 9685 27-168026-0 FJS FJS JTG Laurent Builders 1113 Polk Street 10/09/92 11/06/92 12/02/92 9686 27-168007-0 FJS JTG Laurent Builders 1144 Polk Street 10/09/92 11/09/92 9687 27-166018-0 FJS JTG Allan Thomas Homes 1224 Tumbleweed Circle 10/13/92 11/10/92 Attachment B PROPOSED PROJECTS a. Inland Container 60, 000 ± S.F. expansion $2, 000, 000 Valuation ± b. Valleyfair $2 , 000, 000 Valuation + c. Shakopee Town Square County Market (Juba's) expansion $750, 000 Valuation + d. Cross of Peace Lutheran Church $500, 000 Valuation ± e. Opus Corporation Warehouse - Industrial Park $5, 000, 000 Valuation + f. Rahr Malting Additional permits $3 , 000, 000 Valuation ± g. Super 8 Motel Expansion $1, 000, 000 Valuation + h. Women's Correctional Facility Expansion $11, 000, 000 Valuation + January UPCOMING MEETINGS SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 City Hall Closed 3 4 5 7:00 p.m. 6 7 7:30 p.m. 8 9 Public City Planning Utilities Council 4:30 p.m. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Committee of the Whole 7:00 p.m. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 7:00 p.m. CDC - City Hall City 5:30 p.m. Closed Council E & T - 7:00 p.m. 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 7:00 p.m. Park & Rec. Board 3 1 December 1992 February 1993 SMTWTFS SMTWTFS 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 27 28 29 30 31 23 1 12/17/ 1992 TENTATIVE AGENDA REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 5 , 1993 Mayor Gary Laurent presiding 1 ] Roll Call at 7 : 00 p.m. 2 ] Approval of Agenda 3 ] Recess for H.R.A. Meeting 4] Re-convene 5 ] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 6 ] Mayor' s Report 7 ] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 8 ] Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests , in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda . ) *9] Council Meeting Objectives and Procedures *10] Approval of Minutes of December 1st, 7th, and 9th, 1992 11 ] Communications : *a] Shakopee School Board, urging Congress to make reordering federal spending priorities America ' s top priority in 1993 b] 12] Public Hearings : None 13 ] Boards and Commissions : None 14] Reports from Staff: a] East Shakopee Transportation Plan b] 10th Avenue Vacation *c ] Purchase of 1993 Compact Utility 4 X 4 *d] Purchase of 1993 1 1/2 Ton "Contractors" Truck *e ] Mechanical Services Agreement - Municipal Buildings *f] New Employee and Consultant *g] Authority of City Administrator to Lease Space *h] 1993 Liaison Appointments *i ] Nominations to Boards and Commissions *j ] Official Newspaper *k] Approve Bills in the Amount of $762 ,089 . 83 *1 ] Recreation Receptionist - Position Clarification Status Change TENTATIVE AGENDA January 5 , 1993 Page -2- 15 ] Resolutions and Ordinances : *a] Res . No . 3727 - Authorizing Contract With Regional Transit Board *b] Res . No . 3728 - Making A Negative Declaration on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for St . Francis Regional Medical Center 16 ] Other Business : a] Committee of the Whole - January 12th at 7 : 00 p .m. b] c ] 17 ] Recess for An Executive Session to Discuss Collective Bargaining 18] Re-convene 19 ] Adjourn to Tuesday, January 19 , 1993 at 7 :00 p .m. Dennis R. Kraft City Administrator TENTATIVE AGENDA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ANNUAL MEETING JANUARY 5, 1993 Oath of Office by New Officials 1 . Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M. 2 . Approval of the December 1st and 15th, 1992 Meeting Minutes 3 . Election of Officers 4 . Statement of Interests in Real Estate 5 . 5th Avenue\Market Street - Purchase Offer Extension 6 . Other Business a) b) 7 . Adjourn Dennis R. Kraft Executive Director OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 1, 1992 Chairman Sweeney called the meeting to order at 7 : 08 p.m. with Commissioners Lynch, Laurent, Vierling and Beard present. ' Also present were Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator; Karen Marty, City Attorney; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; Dave Hutton, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; and Tom Steininger, Police Chief. Lynch/Vierling moved to approve the minutes of November 3 , 1992 . Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock explained that at the last HRA meeting staff reported that Mr. Jeff Monnens was requesting reimbursement from the Shakopee HRA due to excessive soil corrections that needed to be completed on the property acquired from the HRA. Prior to taking action on Mr. Monnens request, the HRA asked Mr. Monnens to submit a cost justification for his request. Mr. Stock explained that Mr. Monnens has submitted a cost estimate which has been reviewed by staff and does not appear to contain any excessive costs for services rendered. Mr. Stock explained that staff is recommending that Mr. Monnens be reimbursed 50% of the $4 , 001. 50 request based on the rationale that both parties except responsibility for the unexpected cost associated with the development of Lot 1. Discussion ensued. Vierling/Beard authorized the proper HRA officials to reimburse Mr. Jeff Monnens 50% of the $4, 001. 50 request for the costs associated with the development of lot located at 339 Market Street. Discussion ensued. Motion carried with Cncl. Sweeney dissenting. Beard/Lynch moved to conceptually approve the Shakopee Downtown Pre-Development Plan (as contained in the Assistant City Administrators memo dated 11-24-92) . Motion carried unanimously. (Construction of the ornamental rail shall be on both sides of the bridge and bypass to match character of ornamental lighting. ) Lynch/Vierling moved to adjourn at 7 : 18 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Judith S. Cox City Clerk/Recording Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPECIAL SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 15, 1992 Chairman Sweeney called the meeting to order at 7 : 03 P.M. with Commissioners Lynch, Beard, Vierling, and Laurent present. Dennis Kraft, City Administrator; Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator; Karen marty, City Attorney; Judith Cox, City Clerk; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; and Dave Hutton, Public Works Director/City Engineer were also present. Beard/Vierling moved to accept the call for a special HRA meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Beard offered Resolution No. 92-9 , A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 91-2 Adopting the 1992 Budget, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Laurent/Vierling moved to transfer $45, 000 from the FMG fund to the HRA fund. Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Laurent moved to adjourn the HRA meeting at 7 : 05 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Dennis R. Kraft Executive Director Debra Zabel Recording Secretary MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Election of Officers DATE: December 31, 1992 INTRODUCTION: Article II Section B of the Bylaws of the HRA provide for the election of officers at the annual meeting. BACKGROUND: The Bylaws provide that a Chairman, Vice Chairman and Secretary be elected by and from the Commissioners at the annual meeting immediately after the roll call and approval of the minutes of the previous meeting. The officers shall take office immediately after being elected. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to elect a Chairman, Vice Chairman and Secretary from the membership of the Commission. *y MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Toni Warhol, Administrative Secretary RE: Commissioner Interest in Real Estate DATE: December 31, 1992 Please find attached a disclosure of real estate located within the corporate limits of the City of Shakopee. Please list any property that you have interest in. Thank you. **NOTE: I have attached last year's for your convenience. I, , have interest in the following real estate located within the corporate limits of the City of Shakopee: Date: Signature: 4!i5 MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, HRA Executive Director FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: 5th Avenue\Market Street - Rutt Purchase Offer Extension DATE: December 29, 1992 INTRODUCTION: In February of 1992 the Shakopee HRA approved a purchase offer for the property adjacent to the 5th Avenue\Market Street Project. The closing date set forth in the current purchase agreement expires on January 26, 1993 . Special circumstances require that the closing date be extended at this time. BACKGROUND: Prior to listing the property adjacent to the 5th Avenue\Market Street Project the City had to condemn several properties. Staff believed that the condemnation process was complete when the purchase agreement was initially executed between Mr. David Rutt and the Shakopee HRA in February of 1992 . During the title and examination process it was discovered that condemnation had not cleared the title. It was determined that in order to have a clear title to the property it would be necessary to complete the torrens process. The torrens process is expected to be complete in April. Staff has contacted Mr. Rutt to determine if he would be willing to agree to extend the closing date on the purchase agreement to May 31, 1993 . Mr. Rutt does not have a problem with the proposed closing date. If the torrens process is completed earlier, staff will move forward with the closing. Therefore, staff is recommending that the appropriate HRA officials be authorized to execute an addendum to the purchase agreement extending the closing date to on or before May 31, 1993 . ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute an addendum to the Rutt purchase agreement extending the closing date to May 31, 1993 . 2 . Do not extend the closing date. 3 . Table action pending further information from staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1. ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute an addendum to the Rutt purchase agreement extending the closing date to May 31, 1993 . CONSENT a — 49 MEMO TO: City Council and City Administrator FROM: Gary L. Laurent , Mayor RE: City Council Meeting Objectives and Procedures DATE: December 31 , 1992 Attached please find a City Council memo from December 27 , 1989 which discusses the procedures I wanted to utilize for the conduct of City Council meetings . I believe that the first meeting of the new year is an appropriate time to review past procedures and update them where appropriate . Please review this memo and be prepared to discuss any areas where changes in the council meeting procedure should be made or where my performance could be modified. Please review the memo and be prepared to discuss only those specific areas where changes or improvements should be made . ATTACHMENT MEMO TO: City Council and City Administrator FROM: Gary Laurent, Mayor-Elect RE: Council Meeting Objectives and Procedures DATE: December 27 , 1989 INTRODUCTION: It is my belief we can best serve the interests of our City by conducting Council meetings in a fashion which accomplishes the meeting objectives outlined below. Although it is a major duty of the Mayor to bring order and direction to meetings the responsibility for process is shared with Council and staff. I propose that a workshop session be scheduled at 4: 30 P.M. on January 16, 1990 so that not only meeting procedures, but also individual Council and staff procedural guidelines can be discussed and adopted. Although I consider all of the items outlined in this memo open for discussion at the workshop meeting; I believe it important to "start on the right foot" . Therefore, I ask your support in immediately implementing those procedures herein outlined. Most probably fall under Mayoral prerogative and are in fact a matter of style. All are intended to be beneficial to our common concerns. MEETING OBJECTIVES: Not necessarily a complete list of meeting objectives, the following were considered when proposing certain meeting procedures. Meetings should (in no order of importance) : - Be concise; - Be understandable (by Council members, staff, recording secretary, attenders, the press and TV audience; - Be accountable (to the citizens being represented) ; - Be open to public input; - Allow ample opportunity for discussion and fair representation of all ideas and opinions; - Encourage staff input of material fact and staff conclusions; - Enhance the image of the City; - Be respectful of all people; - Conduct the business of the City with the interests of the overall community guiding the decision making process. MEETING PROCEDURES: Some of the following are recommended changes while many others are reiteration of previously adopted procedures where stronger adherence is sought. I am recommending that we: - Limit the "Liaison Reports" section of the agenda to just liaison reports ; - Have "Other Business" a regular part of every agenda; - Add "Mayor' s Report" as a regular part of every agenda; - Allow the audience to speak to the consent agenda regarding the removal of an item from consent; - Generally maintain stricter adherence to parliamentary procedure (but not absolute! ) ; - Enforce that only those having the floor as recognized by the chair shall speak; - Encourage both audience and Council members to address the chair; - Encourage that motions be descriptive of action sought i.e. not simply "move the requested action" ; - Make a stronger effort to make motions only in the affirmative; - Allow any member to make modifications to a motion, if acceptable to the maker, but only, prior to the start of discussion as signalled by the chair; (After discussion has begun a motion can be altered only by a successful motion to amend. ) - Disallow discussion on a motion until seconded or declared dead; - Generally follow that the member who makes a motion will be given the first opportunity to speak in discussion; - Generally recognize any member who has not spoken on a question over one who has; - Discourage cumbersome, lengthy and numerous amendments to a motion; - Rule against explanation of vote by members during voting; - Delete "automatic" roll call votes ; - Declare a unanimous vote if a motion receives any votes on one side and none on the other; - Generally, report by the chair the results of all votes indicating those members in the minority; - Delete the need for motions for minor actions which can be handled more informally by general or unanimous consent; - Make every effort to be protective of staff, Council and citizens from personal or unnecessary derogatory attacks. CONCLUSION: I will focus most of my attention during meetings on the process of the meeting itself. I still, however, will need your assistance in maintaining proper meeting procedure. That is our challenge. It's easy to drift away. Please do not take my enforcement of procedure personally and please let me know (preferably after the meeting) if you think I was out of line. Please also discuss with me any ideas or concerns you may have for the way meetings are run or any other issue which can improve our City. The contents of this memo will be discussed at our meeting on January 2 , 1990. However, if you have a major concern about any of the above, please contact me prior to the meeting for explanation and discussion. REQUESTED ACTION: 1. Endorse Council Meeting Objectives and Procedures as outlined, or; 2 . Amend and endorse Council Meeting Objectives and Procedures. OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 1, 1992 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 7 : 07 p.m. with Councilmembers Lynch, Sweeney, Vierling & Beard present. Also present were: Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator; Karen Marty, City Attorney; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; Dave Hutton, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; and Tom Steininger, Police Chief. The following items were added to the agenda: 15a, approval of bills for the City Hall construction project; 15b, meeting with townships to discuss Fire Service Contract; 15c, proposed budget hearing presentation; and an Executive Session. Vierling/Beard moved to approve the agenda as corrected. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent recessed the City Council meeting for a meeting of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Mayor Laurent reconvened the City Council meeting at 7 : 18 p.m. There were no liaison reports to be given by Councilmembers. Mayor Laurent gave the Mayors Report. Mayor Laurent asked for comments from the audience wishing to speak on any item not on the agenda. There was no response. The following items were added to the consent business: 15a, approval of bills for the City Hall construction project; 13q, AMM Board of Director vacancies and designation of Legislative contact person. The following items were removed from the consent business: 13c, buy back holiday time for Police Officers; 13j , Ambulance service agreement with St. Francis Regional Medical Center; 14b, Ordinance No. 349 , extending the lodging tax for an additional 3 years . Beard/Sweeney moved to approve the consent business as corrected. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Sweeney moved to approve the minutes of November 3 , 1992 . (Motion carried under consent business. ) Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing on an application from the Unbank Company for a currency exchange license at 1100 Canterbury Road. The City Clerk stated that she had nothing to add to the staff memo Council received and that Mr. Rich O' Shay from the Unbank Company was present to answer any questions Councilmembers might have. Official Proceedings of the December 1, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -2- Mayor Laurent asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak to the matter. Mr. Lindemann, Resident in the Eastern part of Shakopee, addressed the Council explaining that Unbank does not have to adhere to the rules of banking. He explained a problem that he had had with Unbank involving cashing a check. There being no further comments from the audience, Mayor Laurent closed the public hearing. Mr. Rich O'Shay, representative from the Unbank Company, explained that this is a currency exchange at Canterbury Downs and it has been located there since 1988 . He explained that they are there at the request of Canterbury Downs and provide a service to their patrons. Vierling/Beard offered Resolution No. 3714, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Approving the Application of Unbank Company for a Currency Exchange License at 100 Canterbury Road, and moved its adoption; with the understanding that this is a convenience and fees are charged for as at other banks. Motion carried with Cncl. Sweeney dissenting. Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing on the proposed storm sewer improvements to Foothill Trail. Cncl.Beard excused himself from the discussion because he owns property affected by the proposed improvements. Cncl. Beard left the Council table and sat in the audience. Mayor Laurent explained the procedure to be followed during the public hearing. Mr. Hutton explained the background on the proposed project and how it progressed to the public hearing. He said that Orr-Schelen- Mayeron & Associates, Inc. prepared the feasibility study and that Mr. Pete Willenbring would be presenting the report. Mr. Pete Willenbring explained their analysis of the drainage problem, the alternatives for correction, the cost of the alternatives, the financing options and their recommended alternative. He recommended Alternative D because it was the least costly and has the most flexibility for development of property to the East. Mr. Hutton explained the city ' s storm water utility policy and possible modifications from the policy. Mayor Laurent asked if there were any questions from councilmembers. Cncl .Vierling asked why the proposed assessments Official Proceedings of the December 1, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -3- were on a unit basis instead of area benefit since some lots are smaller than 2 1/2 acres. Mr. Hutton responded that larger lots have lawn, but all lots have a house and drive creating the same amount of runoff. Mr. Willenbring stated that the assessments were more equitable on a per lot basis because development causes runoff from the houses and driveways. Mayor Laurent asked for comments from members of the audience. Kate Eurison, 7802 Horizon Drive, stated that she had difficulty understanding that there is a problem. She has never seen water running down the ravine and through the culvert. She doesn't believe that the proposed method of payment is equitable and that the neighborhood will be fractionalized if people living up the hill pay the same as the people down stream. Mr. Hutton stated that the report is based upon topo maps and that the design has not yet been done. The final design may change if there is ponding. Mayor Laurent asked what will happen to the existing culverts located at the rear of lots. Mr. Hutton stated that they will remain and will be bypassed; and, that they can be filled in. Bob Lindstrom, 2099 Foothill Trail, asked what would happen to his landscaping if an open ditch is put on his property. He explained that he went to a considerable amount of expense to not have an open ditch on his property. Steve Muhlenhardt, 7556 Eagle Creek Boulevard, expressed concern because he recently sold two lots telling the buyers that there were no assessments and now there will be assessments. They may think that he was unloading them. He is not in favor of the improvements "now" . Ralph Furrie, resides at the East end of the open field and North of the cul-de-sac East of Horizon Drive. He stated that he has lived there since 1965 and that there was no problem unit 1977 when the cul-de-sac was built and he began experiencing runoff into his property. He would like the council to consider taking care of the problem for everyone involved, in addition to the proposed project. Mr. Hutton explained that there are actually three drainage basins to CR-16 and that all three have problems with poor drainage. He said that this project will not correct the drainage basin in Mr. Furrie ' s area. Randy Wosmek, Lot 9, 8330 Horizon Drive, asked if the study pertained to infiltration, and stated that he seldom sees water rushing down the gully. Mr. Hutton responded that infiltration is Official Proceedings of the December 1, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -4- taken into consideration as well as undeveloped property which will drain into the area when the study is prepared. Mr. Lindemann, 7979 Martindale Drive, stated that he does not believe that the project is necessary at this time and that it is not fair to assess property up on the hill. He said that water from the South does not go through the culvert over Horizon Drive. Julie Ann Johnson, 7960 Horizon Drive, stated that she agrees that no water flows through the culvert. Mr. Hutton explained the misunderstandings over which culverts are being addressed. Ms. Johnson also asked if there is any property damage to homes on Foothill Trail and what is the urgency for this project. Mr. Hutton responded. Linda Muhlenhardt, owner of two undeveloped parcels South of Lots 1, 2 , and 3 , Block 4 , stated that she has no plans to develop her property. She said that the water seeps into the ground and that she has only one house on the property. She stated that she sees no need for the project and that it is of no benefit to her. Denise Rief, 2207 Foothill Trail, stated that she has had no water problems for five years, that she sees no reason for the project, and that the project will destroy the tree line. Charles Lundby, 4040 Horizon Drive, stated that he has seen no problem of standing water in seven years and sees no need for the project. Mayor Laurent stated that Council has heard from a number of residents indicating that they will not benefit from the project, that they have no need for it and that there are no problems that need to be solved. He asked if there was anyone present who sees a need for the project, except Mr. Furrie? Gail Fink, Block 3 , Lot 11 (8394 Horizon Drive) , stated that there is debris in the ditch blocking drainage. When talking about future development, she asked why they wouldn 't pay for the drainage problems they would be causing? Charleen Degia, Block 6, Lot 2 (2129 Foothill Trail) , expressed concern for the lots on Foothill Trail because of the confusion of the drainage way in the back of their lots. She said that she is in favor of nothing happening if there is assurance that nothing will happen for ten years so that they can develop their property (landscaping in rear of lots) . She said that this is a surprise to her and she does not have a major landscaping problem right now. Terry Glassel, Block 5, Lot 2 , stated that he has lived there for six months and that he would like to see the ditch moved off his property into the easement. Official Proceedings of the December 1, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -5- Dan Talcott, Block 6, Lot 1, (2117 Foothill Trail) , stated that he currently has no water problems, that he has applied for permits for landscaping and has been denied. He said that if he can do landscaping, he doesn't care if the project is not done. Dennis Fink, 8394 Horizon Drive, stated that he has lived at the top of the hall for ten plus years and that he has never seen a water problem. He said that the letter from the City came as a shock. Ralph Goode stated that he owns the parcel that will pay $4, 750. 00, which is 13 1/2% of the project. He expressed his opposition to the project. He stated that Mr. Hutton was originally in favor of installing a ditch for 21st and wondered why the project is being changed. He stated that he is being charged for five lots and wanted to know if he has five buildable lots. Michael Beard, 8434 Horizon Drive, stated that judging by the opposition to the project by his neighbors, he recommended closing the public hearing, if no one would object. Mr. Lindstrom asked who is liable if there is a heavy rain and the culvert on his property (which is not in the easement) plugs up; the culvert touches the easement but he couldn't detour the culvert to within the easement. Cncl. Sweeney asked Mr. Lindstrom when he installed the culvert, in ' 87 or ' 88 . Cncl. Sweeney stated that he was allowed to put the culvert in the existing ditch which is not in the easement. An unidentified individual asked who would benefit from the project. He stated that he believed that the undeveloped property to the North of Horizon Drive would benefit. He suggested making the improvements and assessing them when this land is developed. Mr. Furrie stated that he has been having property damage and if there is more rain there will be damage again. Mr. Goode asked why this project has gone this far. Mr. Sweeney responded. Mayor Laurent closed the public hearing at 9 : 31 P.M. Sweeney/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3712 , A Resolution Ordering An Improvement and the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Foothill Trail Drainage Improvements, Project No. 1993-2 , and moved its adoption. Discussion followed. Motion failed with Cncl.Beard abstaining. Sweeney/Lynch moved to direct staff to review the placement of the drainage ditch (East of Foothill Drive) and the cost to put it Official Proceedings of the December 1, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -6- where it is supposed to be and get it there. Motion carried with Cncl.Beard abstaining. Council recessed from 9 :40 p.m. until 9: 53 p.m. Sweeney/Vierling offered Resolution No. 3713 , A Resolution Approving Amendment of Bond, (Shakopee 84 Partnership Project) , and moved its adoption; with the caveat that the Cities bond counsel, Tom Hay, provide final approval . Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Sweeney moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to contact the County Engineer and request that he initiate the process necessary to establish a 30 mph speed zone on Marschall road from 4th Avenue to Vierling Drive and a 45 mph speed zone from Vierling Drive to a point South of the Hwy 101 bypass. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Sweeney/Vierling moved to authorize the purchase of unused holiday time as requested (by Police Officers) in an amount of approximately $11, 771. 51 and directed that the Officers selling the time be compensated on or before the last payroll date prior to Christmas. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Vierling moved to notify the Police Officers that in 1993 the City will not be exercising the option to purchase unused holiday time. Discussion followed. Motion defeated with Councilors Laurent, Vierling, Beard & Lynch opposed. Beard/Vierling directed the Chief of Police and the City Administrator to collaborate and discuss the problem of the City buying back unused holiday hours, within an acceptable amount of time, with the intention that there be some sort of a cap placed on the practice. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Sweeney moved to authorize the payment of $891 . 84 to Sgt. Ray Erlandson to compensate him for the period from June 19 , 1991 to December 19 , 1991. (Motion carried under consent business) Beard/Sweeney moved to authorize staff to contract with Orr- Schelen-Mayeron (OSM) to survey Tahpah Park for an amount of $6, 425 . 00 utilizing surplus money from the Engineering Departments budget. (Motion carried under consent business) Mr. Stock explained that he has received a proposal for a market and operational analysis of the Valley Ice Arena in Shakopee from OSM in the amount of $18 , 500. 00. He explained that approximately $5, 000 . 00 of this amount is attributed to the financial feasibility portion of the project which will be completed by Springsted Public Financial Advisors. He stated that he believes that there are a Official Proceedings of the December 1, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -7- number of questions that remain unanswered which necessitate an analysis of the ice arena. Sweeney/Vierling moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into an agreement with Orr-Schelen-Mayeron to complete the market and operational analysis of the Valley Ice arena at a cost not to exceed $18, 500. 00 with funding to be allocated from the contingency appropriations account. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Sweeney moved to conceptually approve the Shakopee Downtown Pre-Development Plan as contained in the Assistant City Administrator' s memo dated November 24 , 1992 , CC DOC #198 . (Motion carried under consent business) Beard/Sweeney moved to approve the 1993/97 Capital Improvement Program. (Motion carried under consent business) Sweeney/Vierling moved to remove item #13i from the table, signal at County Road 17 and 10th Avenue. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3710, A Resolution Authorizing the Execution of Cooperative No. TS92-17/10 with Scott County for the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of CSAH 17 and 10th Avenue, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Cncl. Vierling asked why the Cities of Chaska and Prior Lake were not included in the ambulance service agreement between the City and St. Francis Regional Medical Center. No one present was able to answer the question. Vierling/Beard moved to table the ambulance service agreement between the City and St. Francis Regional Medical Center. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Sweeney moved to authorize the closing of City Hall at noon on December 24 , 1992 with the stipulation that employees use their vacation time, comp time, take the time off without pay (if they have no vacation time coming) or that employees may work if they choose to do so. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Beard/Sweeney moved to prepay the assessment for the Jefferson Street project levied against City owned property parcel #27- 121030-0 in the amount of $1 , 590. 43 and for the Vierling Drive project levied against the City owned property parcel #27-169051-0 in the amount of $2 , 011 . 23 out of the Capital Improvement Fund. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Beard/Sweeney moved to renew the employee group health insurance with Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Minnesota (Motion carried under consent business. ) Official Proceedings of the December 1, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -8- Beard/Sweeney moved to approve the application from Mrs. Lucille Odenwald, 614 East 2nd Avenue and grant deferment of special assessments to parcel #27-004022-0 for the 1991-3 2nd Avenue public improvement project pursuant to the conditions outlined in Section 2 . 82 of the City Code. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Beard/Sweeney moved to authorize the City Clerk to issue cigarette licenses for 1993 . (Motion carried under consent business. ) Vierling/Lynch moved to concur with staff recommendation and set the 1993 sewer rate at $3 . 50 per month plus $1.26 per 1000 gallons with a billing of $9 . 80 for un-metered or new residential accounts. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Sweeney moved to designate Joan Lynch as the City of Shakopee's Legislative contact person for the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities for the 1993 legislative session. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Beard/Sweeney moved to nominate Joan Lynch to serve on the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and authorized the appropriate City officials to inform the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities office of said nomination. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Beard/Sweeney moved to appoint Barry Stock as Acting City Clerk from December 5, 1992 to December 12 , 1992 . (Motion carried under consent business. ) Beard/Sweeney moved to approve the bills in the amount of $251, 783 .76. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Discussion ensued on the proposed 1993 fees for the Planning Department. Sweeney/Vierling moved to approve the recommended Planning Department fees and to incorporate them into the 1993 fee schedule with the exception of the zoning ordinance text amendment fee and the building permit site plan review fee. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Sweeney offered Ordinance #348 , 4th Series, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending City Code Chapter 5, Liquor, Beer and Wine Licensing and Regulation, Section 5. 01, Applications and Licenses - Procedure and Administration, Subd. 7, Unlawful Acts, By Repealing Paragraph B, Removal of Containers, and Adopting One New Paragraph in Lieu Thereof, Relating to the Same Subject, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business. ) Official Proceedings of the December 1, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -9- Lynch/Vierling moved to table Ordinance No. 349 , 4th Series, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending City Code Chapter 6, Other Business Regulations and Licensing, Section 6 . 44 , Lodging Tax, By Extending the Termination Date in, Subd. 6. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Sweeney offered Ordinance No. 350, 4th Series, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending City Code Section 9 . 50, Parking During Street Maintenance, Snowy Weather, and in Central Business District, Subd. 2, Snowy Weather, by Applying the Parking Restrictions on 2nd Avenue Only During Weather Conditions Warranting Plowing, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under consent business. ) It was the consensus of City Council to meet with the Jackson and Louisville Township Boards on Wednesday, December 9 , 1992 at 4 : 30 p.m. or 7 : 00 p.m. to discuss the Township Fire Contracts. Cncl. Sweeney ran through the budget presentation he would like to make at the December 7 , 1992 budget public hearing. Councilmembers concurred with the presentation as presented. Sweeney/Vierling moved that the allowance for uncollectible taxes be reduced from 2% to 1%. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Vierling moved that the contingency appropriation be reduced from $50, 000 . 00 to $25, 000. 00 . Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent recessed the City Council for an Executive Session to discuss litigation, at 11: 26 p.m. Mayor Laurent reconvened the City Council at 11: 45 p.m. No action was taken by the City Council during the Executive Session. Mayor Laurent adjourned the meeting to Monday, December 7 , 1992 at 7 : 00 p.m. for the 1993 General Fund Budget Hearing at the Scott County Courthouse, Rooms 318 and 319 . Meeting adjourned at 11: 45 p.m. l ! Judith S. Cox City Clerk Recording Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 7 , 1992 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 7 : 03 P.M. with Councilmembers Lynch, Sweeney, Beard, and Vierling present. Also present were Barry Stock, Ass 't City Administrator; Dennis Kraft, City Administrator; and Gregg Voxland, Financial Director. Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing on the 1993 budget. Mayor Laurent informed the public that the property evaluations were not going to be discussed at the meeting. A main purpose of the meeting was to follow the Truth and Taxation Law by the State of Minnesota. Cncl. Sweeney held a presentation for the public to explain the process for determining the budget. Mr. Harry Weinandt, 1259 Maxine Circle, was unclear about the public safety account where the fire truck was concerned. Mr. Weinandt wanted to know where the money came from and how the Capital Equipment Fund was being used. Cncl. Sweeney informed Mr. Weinandt that the money was in the Capital Equipment Fund and transferred into the general fund budget to pay for the fire truck. Therefore, all of the money was available, but just transferred from one fund to another. Mr. Weinandt also asked how the million and-a-half reduction from the race track was going to effect the taxes. Cncl. Sweeney said that this would not effect the taxes at all. Cncl. Sweeney also informed him that this money went into a tax increment fund to pay for the improvements for the race track and other improvements in the City. Mr. Weinandt wanted to know why the people who worked for the City of Shakopee did not have to live in Shakopee and pay the taxes that were set forth. Cncl. Sweeney said that would be illegal to force someone to live where they worked and also discriminatory. Mr. Weinandt wondered if the two extra policemen that were hired for the race track would still be kept on. Cncl. Sweeney expressed a need for the extra policemen because of the growing population, the amusement park, the casino and the truck traffic through Shakopee. Mr. Greg Weigold, 3000 County Road 42 , suggested that the Council look more closely at how money was being spent. For example, he suggested that someone bring in their own newspaper from home and that travel expenses were being utilized carelessly. Mr. Weigold also commented on the increases in City Council, Finance and Administration and thought that there should be pay Official Proceedings of the December 7, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -2- cuts. Mayor Laurent informed him that several departments were consolidated and staff was reduced in the past couple of years and in some areas reduced in the 1993 budget. Mr. Weigold commented on the mechanic being hired at $30, 00 a year which is more than what the new police officer would be making. Mr. Robert Waldridge, 1074 Legion Street, just wanted to make the point that even if his taxes were increased by 10-14 percent his job was not going to give him a raise to compensate for this increase in taxes. Ms. Blanche Kelly, 1861 Shakopee Avenue East, was confused as to where the funds for the fire truck were coming from and how the increase in public safety was connected with it. Cncl. Sweeney referred back to the expenditure for the fire truck and informed Ms. Kelly that the fire truck cost was included. Cncl. Sweeney also stated that about $650, 000 of the public safety account would be going towards the fire truck purchase. He explained further how the capital equipment fund is used and where it gets its funds from. Ms. Kelly commented on whether the growth of Shakopee was going to do good for the citizens or not and whether property value would increase. Ms. Kelly also wondered how the bypass through Shakopee was going to effect the taxes. She also suggested to Council to go through the newspaper to inform the public of more of what is done by Council. Cncl. Sweeney told the public that there have been cuts and also shuffling of funds have been done to further help the tax situation this year. Mayor Laurent wanted to point out that Shakopee is going to grow whether good or bad. Also that the roads, streets, sewers and water that go into the subdivisions are paid for by the developers and not by the tax payers themselves. However, taxes may increase later with new houses, because additional police may be needed, more recreational services, etc. Mr. Mike Heitz , 622 Adams Street, informed Council that the taxes on his five-plex had gone up almost $2 , 000 in three years and that his valuation increased for the first time this year. Mayor Laurent suggested he talk to the Assessor and see if he could get an explanation for his valuation increase. Mr. Ray Peterson, 1644 East Highway 101 (business address) , told Council that he had a 27 percent increase in taxes, but not in business itself. He also stated that he had other bare land that Official Proceedings of the December 7, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -3- he paid taxes on, but could not sell it because nobody wanted the taxes on it. Mr. Mark Shick, 3509 Marshall Road, suggested Council take a look at other cities and compare taxes, such as Burnsville. Cncl. Sweeney informed him that Burnsville is a much larger city and on a different economy scale. Although, for example, Burnsville probably only has one Chief of Police and one Fire Chief, but then so does Shakopee. Cncl. Sweeney wanted to make the point that the roller coaster effect in taxes is partially atributted to the "Auditor' s Error" revealed a year ago. Mr. Shick asked whether it would be cheaper to hire out services. Cncl. Sweeney and Mayor Laurent brought up St. Francis and the ambulance service. The City pays a fee to them to keep it and also insurance to an extent. Mayor Laurent also added the fire fighters may be voluntary, but they do get paid on service calls. Mr. Shick wondered why the City needed such an advanced fire truck for only one "skyscraper" building in town (Rahr) . Cncl. Sweeney informed him that the fire truck has many uses and that the City would be selling or trading in the old truck. Cncl. Beard commented that going through St. Francis for the ambulance service is saving the people of Shakopee a great deal of money. He also stated that contracting for a snow plow would cost more than to purchase the plow and hire a person to run it. Cncl. Beard compared the miles/employees for snow plowing to Chaska and found a great difference. Mayor Laurent stated that the Public Works Department has less employees now than in 1987 . Cncl . Beard wanted to clarify the hiring of the mechanic. The Council felt that it would be more prudent to hire someone to maintain the City vehicles than to go to a service station and pay more for it. Mr. Voxland shared with Council the tax rate of 22 other cities compared to Shakopee. Mr. Don Colhaun, 1655 County Road 18, wondered why the City needed 21 percent more money this year than last. He also was unclear on why the City needed 21 percent and why his increase is 68 percent. Mayor Laurent clarified that the 21 percent was from the tax levy and that there were higher taxes on commercial/industrial property. Official Proceedings of the December 7, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -4- Cncl. Sweeney stated that the 21 percent was not going to show up as 21 percent on the taxes because there were many other factors to look at. Cncl. Sweeney informed the public that the valuations are increased by the assessor. Mayor Laurent suggested Mr. Colhaun look into the property tax rebate since his valuation went up drastically. Mr. Brian Dols, 1286 Limestone Drive, wanted to know whether his taxes would be higher because of the commercial/industrial values. Cncl. Sweeney said that the tax base would be larger because of that. Shakopee was compared to Jordan and it was found that Jordan got back a large portion of fiscal disparities and Shakopee loses about $158, 000 in fiscal disparities. Shakopee was losing this money, because it has a much larger commercial/ industrial value than Jordan or other smaller towns. Mr. Dols wanted to know whether the K-Mart distribution center paid taxes to the City and how that worked. Mayor Laurent informed him that they paid taxes and the money goes into the tax increment fund. Mr. Harry Weinandt wanted to know about the general fund budget summary from last year of $9, 000 deficit and where that money came from. Mayor Laurent figured that the funds came from the general fund balance, which makes up 25 percent of the budget. Cncl. Sweeney stated that Council paid the debt service levy for 1993 out of the general fund. Now in 1993 , the money will be replaced for next year. Mr. Greg Weigold asked whether the fire truck was bought yet and if a cheaper one was found would the Council buy that one. He also suggested that Council take the time to get more estimates . Cncl. Sweeney informed him that the number was just an estimate for the cost of the fire truck which would be purchased new. Mayor Laurent stated that the fire truck was just budgeted for and bids would be taken on the truck. Cncl. Vierling wanted to invite anyone to come to the budget meetings since they are open to the public and become involved in the process. Mr. Willy Mahowald, 1077 Prairie Street, said that Rahr was going to build first in Utah and that the City should not say that ' s why they are getting a new fire truck mainly for Rahr. He also stated Official Proceedings of the December 7, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -5- that the more houses there are the more taxes will become. Therefore, he suggested to quit giving housing permits. Cncl. Sweeney stated that people receive more dollars in services than they pay in taxes. Also that the cost of services by taxes paid from simply housing doesn't work out. Cncl. Sweeney noted that some actions being done by surrounding areas may restrict the possibility of entry-level housing in Shakopee. An unidentified individual, commented that he sent his children to private schools, but he still had to pay the same taxes. Mayor Laurent closed the public hearing. Beard/Sweeney offered Resolution 3719, A Resolution Setting the 1992 Tax Levy, Collectable in 1993 , and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Vierling offered Resolution 3720, A Resolution Adopting the 1993 Budget, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent adjourned the meeting to Wednesday, December 9, 1992 at 5: 00 p.m. The meeting adjourned at 9 : 25 P.M. (f) • (,)/ ./ Ju ith S. Cox Ci y Clerk Debra Zabel Recording Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 9 , 1992 Call to order at 5: 01 p.m. Present were Mayor Laurent, Council members Beard, Sweeney, Vierling, Dennis Kraft, City Administrator; Gregg Voxland, Finance Director; Frank Ries, Fire Chief. Councilmember Lynch arrived at 5: 17 . Also present were representatives of Jackson and Louisville Townships. Mayor Laurent opened the meeting by welcoming the Town Board members. Norbert Theis initiated discussion of the cost of the land and a second fire station being shared by the townships. The issues of equity, operation and maintenance and purchase of service versus equity were covered. Also covered were the need for a second station, population and location factors and access to the bypass. Council reached consensus to not charge the townships for the cost of the land or the building but to include the operation and maintenance of the building in the Fire Department budget for charge back. The timing of townships payments for the 1993 aerial truck was questioned. Discussion covered the use of the truck, the value of the old truck and interest cost to the townships. The townships share of the Fire Department budget was reviewed in light of the growth of the three bodies and population factors versus tax capacity values. The option of the townships to receive service from Chaska was discussed. Council reached consensus to charge townships interest for the 5 year payment schedule for the larger pieces of equipment. Sweeney/Vierling moved that the townships not be charged for the cost of the building and the land for the second fire station. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion ensued on the fire service contracts with the Townships. Townships expressed concern about locking in a contract to protect the investment in equipment and being left without service on short notice. Sweeney/Vierling moved to direct staff to prepare a contract with a 5 year notice on the part of the City and a one year notice on the part of the townships for cancellation and to address an annual review of the contract. Motion carried unanimously. The Fire Chief reviewed the process of buying a new fire truck. Official Proceedings of the December 9, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -2- The process of billing for standby fees and fire calls for the two townships was reviewed. The townships requested to review the list of fire calls at year end in advance of annual billing. Council reached consensus to add a $10. 00 service fee to invoices for fire calls for Louisville Township. Norbert Theis mentioned concerns over the Water Management Organization and the upper valley drainage ditch. The meeting was adjourned to Tuesday, December 15th at 7 : 00 p.m. The meeting adjourned at 6: 15 p.m. AA JId'th S. Cox C 't Clerk Gregg Voxland Recording Secretary CONSENT //Q REINVEST IN AMERICA A New Priorities Proclamation We,the Board of Education of Shakopee in the state of Minnesota, do hereby adopt the following resolution in support of new national federal budget priorities for the United States of America. Whereas, the Shakopee school district is committed to offering every child in our community the opportunity for a quality education. And whereas our nation's success in the post-Cold War world will depend on the ability of America's public schools to educate each and every child. And whereas no single school district has the financial capacity to both build a quality education program for the 21st Century and overcome the social and economic problems that prevent students from coming to school ready to learn. And whereas the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union offer our nation a once-in-a-generation opportunity to rethink our national priorities. And whereas our competitors in the global marketplace invest more tax dollars on children and elementary and secondary education than does the United States. And whereas federal budget savings made possible by the end of the Cold War could be used to rebuild American and ensure that every child comes to school healthy and ready to learn. And whereas the national organizations that represent the men and women at the local level who care most deeply about education--the National School Boards Association, the National PTA, the National Association of Elementary School Principals, the national Association of Secondary School Principals, the American Association of School Administrators, the Council of Great City Schools, the National Education Association, and the American Federation of Teachers -- have jointly called for new federal budget priorities that reflect post-Cold War realities. Therefore, be it resolved, that the Shakopee school district believes it is time to reinvest in America. We join school districts across the United States to urge the Congress and the President elected November 3 to make reordering federal spending priorities America's top priority in 1993. And be it further resolved, that the Shakopee school board will forward this call for new priorities to our community's elected representatives in Congress and to the President of the United States. And, be it further resolved, that the Shakopee school board will also forward this resolution to the Shakopee City Council and Scott County Board of Commissioners and urge them to join this call to reinvest in America. Qcf,,B L) .. 1 - [L,-CO-,Jane L.Wendt,School Board Chair Date RECOMMENDED ACTION: Direct the City Administrator to send a letter to Shakopee' s elected representatives in Congress and to the President of the United States urging them to make reordering federal spending priorities America' s top priority in 1993 . #/1-i - 1 , MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, City Planner RE: Authorization to Hire Consultant to Prepare the East Shakopee Area Transportation Study DATE: December 31, 1992 INTRODUCTION: Staff is requesting authorization to hire a consultant to prepare the East Shakopee Area Transportation Study. BACKGROUND: At the February 4, 1992 , meeting the City Council held a public hearing for proposed improvements for an unnamed street to the Bergquest property in the industrial park. The proposed street would be located south of Highway 101 and east of Valley Park Drive. The hearing was tabled to allow staff an opportunity to further research transportation issues in the area. Staff was directed to develop a work program to guide a study of area development issues. The issues to be reviewed include land use, transportation, utilities, existing land ownership patterns, zoning, etc. It was identified that although the regional transportation system improvements (Shakopee Bypass, Bloomington Ferry Bridge, Mini Bypass) have received much attention, the City street system in the East Shakopee area needs more planning. Staff presented a map to the City Council, at the February 4 meeting, which identified the study area as being bounded on the south by County Road 16, on the west by County Road 17 , the north by the Minnesota River and to the east the City limits. The City is often asked to review and approve development proposals in the area without the benefit of having a more detailed street plan from which to compare. After researching the area transportation issues, staff determined that a traffic consultant could better address the various issues in a transportation plan. Staff requested the City Council to authorize the hiring of a consultant to prepare this plan at the May 5, 1992 meeting. At this meeting the City Council moved to direct staff to include the East Shakopee Area Transportation Study in the 1993 Budget. DISCUSSION: Staff began researching the various issues in the area and reviewed the capacities of our three on-line consultants with respect to the requested study. Staff selected Stgar, Roscoe and Fausch, Inc. (SRF) as the appropriate firm since they have been thoroughly involved in transportation planning issues with Scott County, MnDOT, the City of Savage, as well as the City of Shakopee. SRF served as Scott County' s consultant in their preparation of the Scott County Transportation Plan. Attachment #1 is a list of issues that staff and representatives from SRF reviewed in developing a work program for a transportation study for the East Shakopee area. Staff requested that SRF update the scope of services, time table and cost estimate to prepare a Transportation Study for the area. Attached is a copy of the revised proposal from SRF. The proposed total cost by SRF for this study is not to exceed $16,500. The study is included in the 1993 Budget and would be funded by the General Fund. A total of $50, 000 was budgeted for long range plans in 1993 . The requested transportation study was included with the 1993 Budget. Staff strongly recommends SRF as the appropriate consultant for this study. This consulting firm has the greatest background in transportation planning in northern Scott County. Their past planning efforts in the area have provided them with an excellent base from which to work from. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the hiring of SRF as the City' s consultant to prepare the East Shakopee Transportation Study. 2 . Request that staff develop RFP to solicit other firms to prepare the Transportation Study. 3 . Direct staff to prepare the Transportation Study. 4 . Do nothing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1. ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the appropriate persons to prepare and/or sign the necessary documents to hire SRF to prepare the East Shakopee Area Transportation Study, at a cost not to exceed $16 , 500 . EAST SHAKOPEE TRANSPORTATION STUDY MEETING AGENDA Date: March 2 , 1992 Time: 1: 00 P.M. City Council Chambers 129 E. First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota Meeting Purpose: 1 . To provide the City ' s consultant with background information for developing a transportation plan for the East Shakopee area. Topics/Issues/Concerns: The following are issues that may or may not need to be addressed in the final Scope of Services, and are intended to generate discussion only. 1. Project Area North Boundary - Minnesota River East Boundary - City Limits South Soundary - County Road 16 West Boundary - County Road 17 2 . Previous Transportation Planning Efforts: • Draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan • Adopted 1980 Comprehensive Plan • CSAH 18 Comprehensive Plan Amendment • CSAH 18 Interchange - Layout and Design • CSAH 21 Alternative Study 3 . Consider Land Use/Zoning. 4 . Consider Area Development Constraints: • Shakopee Bypass/Highway 101 - Limited Access • Railroad • Prior Lake interceptor • Large land uses - Shiely, NSP, frontage development along Hwy. 101 • Prior Lake Drainage Channel 5. Inventory of Property Ownership Patterns. 6 . Inventory of Wetlands - Impacts on Streets, Development. 7 . Inventory of Floodplain, Bedrock - Impacts. 8 . Coordinate with Comprehensive Sewer Plan (Shcrt-ElliCtt Hendrickson - Consultant) . 9 . Coordinate and Review Valley Green Business Park Plans (Consultant Hired by Business Park Developer) . 10 . Coordinate and Review Shakopee 500 Development Plans. 11. Coordinate and Review Multi-Family Development, i.e. Lenzmeier Property, Upper Valley Drainage. 12 . Coordinate and Review Canterbury Downs, RTD Development. 13 . Coordinate and Review Plans for Businesses Along County Road 16 . 14 . Coordinate with Scott County Capital Improvement Plan and Scott County Transportation Study. 15 . Coordinate with State Aid System. Offer recommendation to increase designated mileage to reduce excess mileage within project area. 16. Update Functional Classification System for Project Area. Project Task: Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch should develop and submit the following: • Scope of Services • Time Table • Cost Estimate City staff to review and ultimately recommend approval of the proposed Scope of Services, Time Table and Cost Estimate to the City Council . Lindberg Ekola David Hutton City Planner Public Works Director SSTDG - � OSCOE-F:�USCH, INC . CONSL'i.TiN(; F:\(,ENF:1rKS �` PL:�1�F.RS a^ - \ ' ■ 5 ...�-l2\� ■ C' •.L ■ L.4N ..:,'L„tiS December 30, 1992 Mr. Lindberg Ekola City Planner CITY OF SHAKOPEE 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 RE: TRANSPORTATION PLAN EAST SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Dear Mr. Ekola: In response to your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal to assist the City of Shakopee in the preparation of a Transportation Plan for East Shakopee. BASIC SERVICES We would propose to carry out all the work as described in the attached Scope of Services. BASIS OF PAYMENT We would propose to be reimbursed for our services on an hourly basis at a rate of 2.5 times salary cost for the actual time expended, and at actual cost for the out of pocket expenses (printing, reproduction) and mileage at a rate of S.26 per mile. Invoices would be submitted on a monthly basis for work performed during the previous month with payment due within 0 days. The total cost for our services on this project is estimated at 516,500.00 and we will not exceed this figure without your approval. The estimate of cost is based on the attached Scooe of Work. It is understood that if the scope or the extent of work should be adjusted at any time, the project cost will be adjusted accordingly. NOTICE TO PROCEED A sinned copy of this proposal returned to this office or Four verbal authorization will serve as notice to proceed. We will begin the work im-mediately thereupon and will complete the prject '. ithin three months. quite 1:zo. One t_ .arl:nn E'arkosai,rth, litiiteapoiit. 'NIinnesota ==4a7 612;475-0010 FAX 612:475.2429 Mr. Lindberg. Ekola - ? - December 30, 1992 We sincerely appreciate your consideration of this proposal and look forward to working with you on this project. +Please feel free to contact us if additional information regarding the subject is required. Very truly yours, STRGAR-ROSCOE•FAUSCH, INC. Robert B. Roscoe. P.E. Senior Vice President RBR:bba Attachments APPROVED: Name Title Date EAST SHAKOP COP EATO STATION PLAN Task 1--Analysis of Public Sector Information .t- pl nin . efforts to ensure consistency between this a. Review previous �';.:'�SpC,«t�C•:-t r1.=�.::.�;- . and previous studies, and to avoid iL'inecessary duplication. Previous efforts include: . Draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan . Adopted 1980 Comprehensive Plan . C,S.A.H. 18 Comprehensive Plan Amendment (not yet approved by the Metropolitan Council) . C.S.A.H. 21 Alternatives Study . Scott County Transportation Plan . City of Savage Transportation Plan • Metropolitan Council Transportation Plan b. Review previous land useTannin efforts to establish the 2010 forecasts in order to ensure consistency and avoid duplicaticn. Previous efforts include: . Sanitary Sewer Plan being prepared by SEH . Draft 1990 Comprehensive Plan . Adopted 1950 Comprehensive Plan . Racetrack Land Use Study . Scott County Transportation Plan . Scott County CIP . Metropolitan Council MDIF and Forecasts . State Aid System c. Collect 1980 and 1990 traffic countson local roadways. (Mn.DDOT and County Roads' traffic are already available from the Scott County Transportation Plan.) and 1990hod= and er ployr.�ent (available `s r of �- n-�rt d. Collect 19S0 population, �:�.._:�.' data prepared for the Scott County Transportation Plan). n-property c\\-r:er_hip patterns (to be provided by City staff), e. Prepare an inventory of prop _ ` �u"� :.::t `ilk :•e provided by City staff). f. Prepare an inventory of V,�i.::l..� are . . r. g. Identify physical constraints. including: . Shakopee Bypass/Highway 101 (limited access) . Railroad (C';W) . Prior lake interchange . Large land uses (NSP, Shiely, Valley Green Business Park, T.H. 101 Frontage Road development) . Canterbury Downs . Prior Lake Drainage Channel . Prior Lake Interceptor Task 2--Analysis of Private Sector Information Incorporate private sector development plans (to be provided by City) into the transportation study, including: . Valley Green Business Park (Dahi��ren, Shardlow, Uban-Phil Carlson) . Shakopee 500 development (Bob ?Morehouse) . Multi-family developments (Lenzmeier Property, Upper Valley Drainage) . Canterbury Downs development . RTD development . Plans for businesses along County Road 16 Task 3--Prepare Area Transportation PIan a. Compare the various population, household and employment estimates with Metropolitan Council esimates and document differences. b. Compare the City's year 2010 population, household and employment forecasts with the forecasts used in the Scott County Transportation Plan. Using the detailed traffic analysis zones defined in the plan, develop ratios of city-to-county estimates (by zone) for subsequent use in developing future traffic volumes for the study area. (`ale expect that the City estimates will bel:igher.) and c. Using the land use plan, development plans, te ofof populatiorowth n, households hou ehold's and unconstrained land availability, develop estimatesP employment in the study area for the year 2010. d. Develop the transportation plan that considers the following elements: Existing roadway system. Programmed and planned roadways in the study area and in the West Shakopee area. . Programmed and planned roadways in adjacent cities (Savage, Prior Lake) and Scott County. . Physical and development constraints. , Future land use plan and proposed or planned development. e. Based onsystem, the land classifyserved by ffthe tss�a d roadwad s roadway runplan and t on accord ng to the traffic forecasts the on the sys em, following designations: . Principal Arterial . Intermediate Arterial . Minor Arterial • Collector . Local f. Document the rationale used for the functional designation, and compare to the Metropolitan Council guidelines. g. Consider the Municipal State Aid System when developing the Functional Classification System, Task 4--Prepare Transportation Plan Products Using the travel demand model developed for Scott County's Transportation Plan in 1991 and ale factors developed in Task 3 to reflect differences in City and County forecast of population, households and employment; and the refined network developed in Task 3, develop: a. Refined forecasts for the study area for the years 2000 and 2010. b. Determine five-year, ten-year and twenty-year roadway improvements in the study area, including number of lanes, inte:secticn traffic signal and channelization and new roads. c. Prepare typical cross-section drawings of roadways, pedestrian trails and typical intersections. Task 5--MeetingsIPresentations a. Attend four coordination meetings with City, developers and busincsscs. b. Attend two meetings with Planning Commission and City Council to make presentations. EAST SHAKOPEE AREA TRANSPORTATION PLAN PRODUCTS 1. Existing traffic count map (1990-1991). 2. Past and anticipated growth in population, households and employment and comparison with Metropolitan Council forecasts (table). 3. TAZ equivalency map (Met Council, County, City). 4. Functional classification system map. 5. Forecasts for the years 2000 and 2010 (maps). 6. Five-year, ten-year and twenty-year roadway improvements (maps). 7. Traffic control identification map (potential traffic signals, stop signs and channelization at intersections). 8. Lane and right-of-way requirements (table). 9. Up to four colored presentation boards. 10. All plan text on Word Perfect 4.1. To the extent possible all data and maps products will be in AutoCAD format. EAST SHAKOPEE AREA TRANSPORTATION PLAN PERSON HOURS BY TASK Hours Task 1--Analysis of Public Sector Information 40 Task 2--Analysis of Private Sector Information 20 Task 3--Area Transportation Plan 90 Task 4--Traffic Forecasts and Needs 90 Task 5--Meetings/Presentations (Six) 25 Total Person-Hours 265 ! b MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, City Planner RE: 10th Avenue Vacation DATE: December 31, 1992 INTRODUCTION: Staff is requesting direction on the proposed 10th Avenue vacation process from the City Council. BACKGROUND: At the July 21, 1992 meeting, the City Council passed a motion approving Resolution No. 3626 which vacated a portion of the 100 foot side 10th Avenue right-of-way east of County Rd. 17 . In the recording process it was determined that the 100 feet of right-of- way for 10th Avenue was dedicated by the two subdivision plats on the north side of 10th Avenue (Scenic Heights 1st and 2nd Additions) . The proposed vacation would have resulted in an undesirable land ownership pattern. In response to this situation, the City Council at the July 28, 1992 meeting, approved Resolution No. 3641 which rescinded the resolution approving the vacation. At this meeting, the City Council also directed staff to prepare the appropriate deeds for the transfers of the portion of the right-of-way on the south side of 10th Avenue to the adjacent property owners. DISCUSSION: One of the necessary steps in recording the vacation of 10th Avenue is the preparation of legal descriptions. Due to the complexity of preparing the legal descriptions, staff requested one of the City' s three consultants, Orr, Schelen and Mayeron (OSM) to prepare a proposal for these services. Attached as Exhibit A is a copy of the proposed services by OSM. The estimated fee is $2 , 225. 00. Based on the unexpected cost of preparing the legal descriptions, staff is requesting direction from the City Council on whether or not to continue the vacation process for this section of 10th Avenue. The process of preparing the necessary legal descriptions is complicated by the fact that the 10th Avenue right-of-way was dedicated by the subdivisions on the north side of the street. The original request for the vacation was initiated by a variance request for a fence to be constructed in a street side yard setback. The fence design was changed and has since been constructed in compliance with the current zoning ordinance requirements. Staff is unaware of any other requests to construct within the street side yard setbacks. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Direct staff to terminate efforts on the vacation of 10th Avenue. 2 . Direct staff to re-initiate the vacation process for that portion of 10th Avenue. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer a motion to direct staff to terminate efforts on the vacation of a portion of the 10th Avenue right-of-way and move its approval. on EXHIBIT A extreelen IL ie It Mayeron& �,�;: Associates,Inc. 300 Park Place Center 5775 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis,MN 55416-1228 December 10, 1992 6175 800-2-595-5 53-5775 FAX 595-5773 Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors Mr. Dave Hutton City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Proposal Dear Dave: Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal to provide surveying services to the City of Shakopee. The proposed services, as we understand them are: 1. Prepare five descriptions and sketches for the vacation of portions of 10th Avenue between Marschall Road and Merrifield Street. 2. Prepare twelve descriptions and sketches for Quit Claim Deeds from the property owners on the north side of 10th to the owners on the south side. Our estimated fee for preparing these descriptions is $2,225. If you have any questions, please call me at 595-5657. We look forward to your favorable response and notice to proceed with this project. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ,;'; / .4c Cd 2z --- D. Edward Ames, L.S. Vice President bjf Equal Opponur.;;_.Employer Plc CONSENT TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxiand, Finance Director RE: Purchase of 1993 Compact utility 4x4 DATE: December 22, 1992 Introduction The 1993 budget contains $16,000 for the purchase of a compact utility 4x4 for the Police Division. Background The 1993 budget contains $16,000 for a compact utility 4x4. Funds are allocated in the Capital Equipment Fund for this purchase. This unit will be used for an unmarked vehicle and back up 4x4 unit for bad weather. One unmarked car will be cycled to another department. It was originally thought that a used unit would have to be acquired for the amount budgeted. However, the Hennepin County contract for a new unit falls within the budgeted amount and used units are going for more than the contract amount. The Hennepin County Purchasing Co-operative contract for the compact utility 4x4 has been awarded to Grossman Chevrolet. The cost is as follows: Base bid $13,599.00 Options; Four doors 600.00 Tilt Steering 175.00 Radio AM/FM 110.00 Service manual 100.00 Subtotal 14,584.00 Dealer option Bucket Seats 400.00 Total 14,984.00 Alternatives 1. Buy unit as per above. 2. Modify above options. 3. Rebid unit on our own. 4. Do not buy truck this year. Recommendation Alternative number 1. The cut off to place an order under the Hennepin County contract is January 18, 1993. Action Requested Move to authorize the purchase of a compact utility 4x4 from Grossman Chevrolet in the amount of $14,984.00. OSENT lTd TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Purchase of 1993 1-1/2 Ton "Contractors" Truck DATE: December 22, 1992 Introduction The 1993 budget contains $25,000 for the purchase of a new 1-1/2 ton "contractors" truck to replace the 1983 1 ton stake truck in the Park Division. Background The 1993 budget contains $25,000 for a new 1-1/2 ton "contractors" truck. Funds are allocated in the Capital Equipment Fund for this purchase. This unit will replace the 1983 1 ton stake truck. Based on previous Council discussion, the 1983 stake truck will be sold this summer unless Council acts to keep the truck and increase the fleet. Public Works is requesting to equip this truck with air conditioning. Other trucks bought for Public Works have not been equipped with air conditioning. The Hennepin County Purchasing Co-operative contract for the 15,000lb GVW chassis cab has been awarded to Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet, Inc. The cost is as follows: Base bid $15,396.00 Options; 454 CI gas motor vs diesel (1,278.00) Air Conditioning 678.00 Service manual 65.00 Total 14,861.00 The quotations for the body of the truck will be brought to Council at a later date. Alternatives 1. Buy truck as per above. 2. Modify above options. 3. Rebid truck on our own. 4. Do not buy truck this year. Recommendation Alternative number 1. The cut off to place an order under the Hennepin County contract is January 18, 1993. Action Requested Move to authorize the purchase of a 15,000lb chassis cab from Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet in the amount of $14,861.00. OOSENT /L/& MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Mechanical Services Agreement - Municipal Buildings DATE: December 28, 1992 INTRODUCTION: Each year the City of Shakopee obtains preventative maintenance service proposals from local contractors to maintain the heating, air conditioning and plumbing systems at the various municipal buildings. The service proposal deadline was December 22, 1992 . BACKGROUND: In early December, staff distributed preventative maintenance service proposals for the municipal buildings to mechanical contractors in the area. Of the eight vendors sent copies of the proposal specifications, three responded; Associated Mechanical, Minnesota Plumbing and Heating and Owens Service Corporation. The proposal specifications indicated that a weighted scoring system would be utilized in reviewing the proposals. The following four factors were ranked utilizing the liability scoring method: 1. Completeness of Proposal (10%) 2 . Contractor Qualifications (25%) 3 . Previous Municipal Experience (25%) 4. Cost (40%) Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator and Charlie Fuller, Custodian, independently ranked the proposals. Shown in Attachment #1 is a summary of the ranking analysis. Mr. Fuller and I each independently ranked Associated Mechanical 's proposal as the best proposal submitted. Staff is therefore recommending that Associate Mechanical be selected as the mechanical service contractor for the City of Shakopee in 1993 . The annual cost for the preventative maintenance services will be $2 , 096. 00. The 1993 budget did include funding for mechanical contractor services. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into a Preventative Maintenance Service Agreement with Associated Mechanical for the City municipal buildings (excluding the new City Hall) . 2 . Do not enter into a Preventative Maintenance Service Agreement with Associated Mechanical for the City municipal buildings (excluding the new City Hall) . 3 . Table action pending further information from staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into a Preventative Maintenance Service Agreement with Associated Mechanical for the City municipal buildings (excluding the new City Hall) . BAS/tiv TAMI\ADMIN\ASSOCIATED Attachment #1 HVAC Preventative Maint. Service Proposal Liability Scoring Method Summary A liability point score of one (1) indicates the best possible score. Proposals were ranked from 1 to 5. Assoc. Minn. Mech. Plumb. Owens 1. Completeness of Proposal - 10% Liability Points + 3 + 5 + 1 * 3 * 5 * 1 Percentage Point Total . 6 1. 0 .2 2 . Contractor Qualifications - 25% Liability Points + 1 + 1 + 1 * 1 * 1 * 3 Percentage Point Total . 5 . 5 1. 0 3 . Previous Municipal Exp. - 25% Liability Points + 1 + 2 + 2 * 1 * 3 * 1 Percentage Point Total .5 1. 25 .75 4 . Cost - 40% Liability Points + 1 + 2 + 5 * 2 * 4 * 5 Percentage Point Total 1.2 2 .4 4. 0 Percentage Point Grand Total 2 .8 5. 15 5.95 NOTE: The lower the percentage point total the better the proposal. CONSENT l� MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Karen Marty, City Attornet"I DATE: December 24 , 1992 RE: New Employee and Consultant In the 1993 budget the Law Department included a part-time secretary and money for a consultant to prepare a new zoning ordinance. I would like to move forward with these projects. Winter is generally a slow time for court. This would be an ideal time to hire and train a new secretary. Likewise, this will be my best opportunity to work with a consultant in preparing a new zoning ordinance. ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Authorize the appropriate city officials to contact Scott County to proceed with the hiring of a part-time legal secretary. 2 . Authorize the appropriate city officials to enter into a contract with a consultant to prepare a zoning ordinance at a cost not to exceed $6000. KEM:bjm [23MEMO2] J CONSENTiym MEMORANDUM TO: THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Karen Marty, City Attorne04/ DATE: December 23 , 1992 RE: Authority of City Administrator to Lease Space The City Administrator has requested authorization from the City Council to lease excess space in the new City Hall from time to time. He would like to be able to lease space, as available and needed, to other governmental agencies, for a nominal amount. ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the appropriate City officials to lease excess space in the new City Hall to other governmental agencies, for a nominal amount. KEM:bjm [23MEM02 ) �. 44 1 k CONSENT MEMO TO: Shakopee City Council FROM: Gary Laurent, Mayor RE: 1993 Liaison/Related Appointments DATE: December 29, 1992 Consistent with past Council practices I 'm hereby making the following recommendations for appointments for 1993 : Shakopee Public Utilities Commission Liaison Robert Sweeney Murphy' s Landing Liaison Joan Lynch Independent School District #720 Liaison Michael Beard Scott County Board of Commissioners Liaison Gloria Vierling Shakopee Clubs and the Shakopee Coalition Michael Beard Shakopee Convention and Visitors Bureau Joan Lynch Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) Joan Lynch (the City Council has already made this appointment) Alternate to AMM Gloria Vierling Suburban Rate Authority Michael Beard 1 Suburban Rate Authority Alternate s Rm ft— ij Vice Mayor, City of Shakopee Joan Lynch scow (.otrlty i3o►- O A/,TMrVi4-T& bob S& & /VY I would appreciate the City Council endorsing the above mentioned appointments. The Suburban Rate Authority specifically requires a resolution for the appointment of both the Director and Alternate Director from the City of Shakopee. Therefore a resolution is attached to this memo. While the Mayor does not have the authority to appoint the Chair of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, I would like to recommend that Michael Beard be elected to that position by the members of the HRA. ACTION REQUESTED: 1) Move to approve the appointments as above mentioned. 2) Move to adopt Resolution No. 3729, a resolution designating a Director and Alternate Director to the Suburban Rate Authority. RESOLUTION NO. 3729 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota as follow: is hereby designated to serve as a director of the Suburban Rate Authority and is hereby designated to serve as the alternate director of the Suburban Rate Authority for the year 1993 and until their • successors are appointed. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1993 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney 2 . Community Development Commission: ( 3 openings ) Mark Miller* Andy Unseth* Kristin Dircks 3 . Energy & Transportation Committee : ( 3-7 openings ) Judy Case* Eldon Reinke* 4. Cable Communication Advisory Commission/Community Access Corp. Board of Directors : ( 2 openings ) James Bastyr* Bill Harrison* 5. Housing Advisory & Appeals Board/Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals : ( 2 openings ) Bob Turek* 6 . Shakopee Public Utilities Commission: ( 1 opening) Terry O'Toole* 7 . Police Civil Service Commission: (1 opening) Richard Mulcronp* 8 . Community Youth Building Committee : ( 3 openings on 1/31/93 and 2 openings from 1/31/92 ) No applications received to date 9 . Park & Recreation Advisory Board : ( 3 openings ) Dolores Lebens* Paul Ten Eyck* John Tieben Sr.* 10. Board of Review: ( 5 were appointed in 1992 of which 2 were Councilmembers ) Eldon Reinke* CONSENT rya` MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S . Cox, City Clerk RE: Nominations to Boards and C missions DATE: December 31 , 1992 INTRODUCTION: Pursuant to the City' s guidelines , Council shall make nominations to Boards and Commissions at their first meeting in January and make appointments at their second meeting. BACKGROUND: Some terms on the City boards and commissions are expiring on January 31 , 1993 . Advertisements appeared in the Shakopee Valley News on December 3rd and 17th, inviting interested residents to consider serving on a board or commission and to submit an application. Letters were also sent to the Lions Club, Rotary, Jaycees , Chamber of Commerce , League of Women Voters and the a representative of the Boy Scouts and Girl Scounts , advising them of openings . Letters were also sent to all members on boards and commissions whose terms are expiring asking them to submit an application if interested in reappointment . The City' s guidlines for appointments to boards and commissions provides for an interviewing committee to meet with the candidates . Because there is only one position open with more than one applicant, the committee will not be interviewing applicants . Two applications have been received (from Gayle Madigan & Cliff Stafford) for the expiring term of Gayle Madigan on the Planning Commission. Both applied for the unexpired term of Melanie Kahleck this past summer and the interview committee recommended the appointment of Ms . Madigan at that time . Since Ms . Madigan has served for only one-half year, it seems appropriate that she be re-appointed to serve a full term. I have discussed this with Mr. Kraft, and he strongly recommends the re-appointment of Ms . Madigan. It has been Council procedure to nominate all individuals who have submitted an application for a board or commission. We have not received sufficient applications to fill all expiring positions on the boards and commissions . If we do not receive additional applications by the January 5th Council meeting, it will be necessary to advertise again. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Nominate to the following boards and commissions the applicants listed. (Those with an asterisk are encumbants . I have also indicat- ed the number of openings . ) 1 . Planning Commission/Board of Adjustment & Appeals : ( 1 opening) Gayle Madigan* Cliff Stafford APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City Boards and/or Commissions. What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you must have an interest in serving your community. The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically have from one to two meetings per month, as follows : Planning Commission/Board of 1st Thursday after 1st Adjustments and Appeals Tuesday at 7 : 30 p.m. Community Development Commission 3rd Wednesday at 5: 00 p.m. Energy & Transportation Committee 3rd Wednesday at 7 : 00 p.m. Cable Communication Commission Quarterly or as needed on Monday at 7 : 30 p.m. Housing Advisory and Appeal Board As Needed Building Code Board of Adjustment As Needed & Appeals Shakopee Public Utilities 1st Monday at 4 : 30 p.m. Commission Park & Recreation Advisory Board 4th Monday at 7: 00 p.m. Police Civil Service Commission As Needed Community Youth Building 2nd Saturday of the month Committee at 9 : 00 a.m. Board of Review 7 : 00 p.m. 2 to 3 Tuesdays I� in May Name: �K�S+en r ISS1 S. Address: /' 1 1Z4 �Cc V � i So n (Qs �-�- Phone: (H) �Q (B) - ILL- 0 �/��q3j 4 How long have you been a resident of Shakopee? Neu) siders f Occupation: 6'1601,106r c r� Does your work require you to travel? (check one) A great deal Periodically Very little Not at all (2,,, * ) Do you have any special interests or training which you feel a particular board or commission could use? (Use separate sheet if necessary) 4a cked Board or Commission in which you are interested? ( k'rar-Ititn[' -iri cvt( oDmee+ Coh-1n-ii�5 :cn Please state briefly why you are interested in serving on this Board/Commission for which you are submitting an application: ``Q c.h e Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any activity, recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or indirect. In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable interest in any business, however organized, which could be constructed as a conflict of interest? Yes No >( . If yes, please provide the details on a separate sheet of paper. Please list three references (Name, Address and Phone) : 1. arq �t�_ .:-c. ga,-.k � � 5 - Co 300 2 . -BobC 5- 1 ,� d 1 S�� 5,krt( I5 1-5 - L+8Z 3 . avS - c,ck ,asp C�4A m. 4+ 5 - SC I hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are true. and c pt reto the best of my knowledge. c� Signature RETURN APPLICATION AND /- PLEDGE TO: Date City Clerk City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 445-3650 DATE RECEIVED: l//� x,21'� Application: page 2 Special interests or training: As Executive Director of the Shakopee Area Chamber of Commerce for the last four years, I feel I am very knowledgeable about all aspects of the community. I have worked with residents on many levels including Derby Days, local promotions and Shakopee Showcase. I have also had extensive contacts with all levels of business and economic development including: developers, builders, contractors, small business, retailers, entertainment attractions, retailers and industries. In addition I have worked effectively with all levels of City staff. I am familiar with the goals and purposes of the CDC and have worked with the members of this commission in the past on many occasions. I feel that I am knowledgeable in the areas of discussion and decisions that would face the CDC in the coming months and years and would be a valuable asset to the CDC. Commission / Board interest: I am very interested in serving as a member of the Community Development Commission. Reasons for interest: I am sincerely interested in the future of Shakopee for the residents and business community. I have worked in Shakopee for four years and have made a permanent commitment to this community recently by purchasing a home. Through my employment at the Chamber of Commerce, I have gained a growing knowledge of the issues facing development and growth in the Shakopee area. I think this is an exciting time for the Shakopee area but also one that will call for extreme prudence and judiciousness in decision making. Shakopee will have the ability to grow considerably in both business and industrial base and also in the residential area. This growth must be carefully monitored and engineered to provide maximum long range benefit to those involved. I am committed to this process and this opportunity. Thank you in advance for your consideration for a position on the Community Development Commission. APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City Boards and/or Commissions . What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you must have an interest in serving your community. The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically have from one to two meetings per month, as follows : Planning Co-^issicn/Board of 1st Thursday after 1st Adjustments and Appeals Tuesday at 7 : 30 p.m. Community Development Commission 3rd Wednesday at 5: 00 p.m. Energy & Transportation Co littee 3rd Wednesday at 7 : 00 p.m. Cable Communication Commission Quarterly or as needed on Monday at 7 : 30 p.m. Housing Advisory and Appeal Board As Needed Building Code Board of Adjustment As Needed & Appeals Shakopee Public Utilities 1st Monday at 4 : 30 p.m. Commission Park & Recreation Advisory Board 4th Monday at 7 : 00 p.m. Police Civil Service Commission As Needed Community Youth Building 2nd Saturday of the month Committee at 9 : 00 a.m. Board of Review 7 : 00 p.m. 2 to 3 Tuesdays in May Name: Calif eve STA- v e,Q Address : c,l', F 6-1 c 6 'eeeLi/D, Phone: (H) `/9S ��7y (3) How long have you been a resident of Shakopee? .4e. Occupation: Does your work require you to travel? (check one) A great deal Periodically Very little Nct at all Do you have any special interests or training which you feel a particular bo rd or commission could use? (Use separate sheet if necessary) /ziv2 E �D��(e.tic� oma✓ G ,� ,�.tiCC, -AcK n,v.6 Board or Commission in which you are interested?,/ ,—/-, -0-/ _ /SJ,o.-, • Please state briefly why you are interested in serving on this Board/Commission for which you are submitting an application: v� 774_ i74 ��S/ /t��Ci �v✓.Kp /yi?�*-7 OP 7-44_ /.cc- ' /�r✓l/ �i�iGlv+ r G^�v�t-/ 9/ /vJAmp$%I ,1,-2 7l' �wq. Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any activity, recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or indirect. In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable interest in any business, however organized, ytich could be constructed as a conflict of interest? Yes No V . If yes, please provide the details on a separate sheet of paper. Please list three references (Name, Address and Phone) : 1. J 0E / Sii /54/4, 0/S-- 2 S _2 . ,at?V ////e nJ 9oY S e ! 57. %YS-/0 S3 3 . .z l4,,) Sc.>77- /a z? s. cis-,-. 9 /4766 I hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. ----"-"Signature RETURN APPLICATION AND PLEDGE TO: �a s-92-__ Date City Clerk City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 445-3650 DATE RECEIVED: Part 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR THE ST. FRANCIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Responsible Governmental Unit: City of Shakopee 129 First Avenue East Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445-3650 November, 1992 Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) — NOTE TO PREPARERS This worksheet is to be completed by the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) or its agents. The project proposer must supply any reasonably accessible data necessary for the worksheet, but is not to complete the final worksheet itself. If a complete answer does not fit in the space allotted, attach additional sheets as necessary. For assistance with this worksheet contact the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) at (612)296-8253 or (toll-free) 1-800-652-9747 (ask operator for the EQB environmental review program) or consult "EAW Guidelines", a booklet available from the EQB. NOTE TO REVIEWERS Comments must be submitted to the RGU (see item 3) during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. (Contact the RGU or the EQB to learn when the comment period ends.) Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of the information, potential impacts that may warrant further investigation, and the need for an EIS. If the EAW has been prepared for the scoping of an EIS (see item 4), comments should address the accuracy and completeness of the information and suggest issues for investigation in the EIS. 1. Project Title St. Francis Regional Medical Center -- 2. Proposer St. Francis Hospital 3. RGU City of Shakopee Contact person Brian Weinreis Contact person Lindberg S. Ekola Address 325 5th Avenue West and title City Planner Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Address 129 First Avenue East Phone (612) 445-2322 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone (612) 445-3650 4. Reason for EAW Preparation [ ] EIS scoping [x] mandatory EAW [ ] citizen petition [ ] RGU discretion [ ] Proposer volunteered If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category number(s) 4410.4300 Subp. 14.B.2 5. Project Location Scott County City of Shakopee Township #115 Range #22 - Section #18 Legal description The Southeast Quarter (SE1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4), the north 21.15 feet of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1!4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE1/4) and the South Half (S1/2) of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4). all in Section 18.Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota Attach copies of each of the following to the EAW: a. a county map showing the general location of the project; See Attachment 1 b. Copy(ies) of USGS 7.5 minutes, 1:24,000 scale map (photocopy is OK) indicating the project boundaries; See Attachment 2 c. a site plan showing all significant project and natural features; See Attachment 3a and 3b d. an existing land use and zoning map of immediate area. See Attachment 4 1 6. Description Give a complete description of the proposed project and ancillary facilities (attach additional sheets as necessary). Emphasize construction and operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or produce wastes. Indicate the timing and duration of construction activities. Type and Scope of Proposed Project: -_ The St. Francis Regional Medical Center project will be located on a 60-acre site directly south of the Shakopee bypass on the east side of County Road 17 in the City of Shakopee, Minnesota. The project will be initially developed in two phases, of which Phase I will be a medical office facility. Phase II will add a 70-bed _ acute care hospital to the campus and an additional medical office building. In later phases, depending on the timing of demand for space, additional medical office space will be added. Various departments within the acute care hospital will also add space as required. Other potential developments on the site may include senior housing facilities, rehabilitation facilities, and other health care related buildings. Phase I - Clinic Building Phase I construction, which is planned to commence in September 1993,will provide 17,000 SF of medical office space for consultation, exam and treatment, plus support, diagnostic and administrative space, in a one- -story structure. It is anticipated this space will function as a clinic as opposed to individual practitioner offices. It is expected that it will initially house 80 employees. (Staffing studies are not complete at this date, but it is estimated and is inclusive of primary, secondary and shared staff.) Depending on demand for space, an additional 17,000 SF will be added as a second floor to this building in subsequential phases between the years 2000-2005. Staff will increase by approximately an additional 80 employees if the expansion occurs. Phase H - 70-Bed Acute Care Hospital/Medical Office Buildin2 Phase II, which will commence in 1994 at the earliest, will be a new hospital of approximately 160,000 SF and up to 70 beds. The tallest portion of the facility may contain two stories plus appropriate mechanical space located above the second story. Reference line 30d for employee information. In addition to the 70-bed acute care hospital, Phase II construction will also include a 34,000 SF medical office building_. It is anticipated the Phase II medical office building will house individual practitioner offices in addition to some hospital administrative and support spaces. Depending, on occupancy, the medical office building. will house up to 110 employees more than the 80 noted above. Later Phases - Other Health Related Facilities Later phases, which are expected to proceed after 2000, are projected to be other healthcare related facilities, and expansions of existing facility types. Some of these may be connected to the medical mall, which would expand in a north/south linear pattern. These may include 70.000 square feet of long term care facilities, housing approximately 140 residents and employing up to 60 additional employees; and 34,000 square feet of additional Medical Office BuildineClinic space, employing an additional 110 employees. Other expansions may occur on the 60-acre campus, but not be connected to the Medical Mall. These development would most likely occur on the north and west side of the campus adjacent to County Road 17 and he accessed via an inner campus perimeter drive. These facilities would most likely include additional Medical Office/Clinic spaces and would not occur prior to the year 2005. Parkin_ for the long term care facility and the additional Medical Office/Clinic spaces connected to the Medical Mall would be rouohly 735 cars in 1995 and increasing to 980 cars in the year 2005. Parking for any "non-connected space" would be added adjacent to each. facility. The "non-connected space" refers to the property north (approximately 20 acres) and the strip of land along County Road 17. 7. Project Magnitude Data Total Project Area (Acres) 60 or Length (miles) N/A Number of Residential Units Unattached N/A Attached N/A Institutional Building Area (gross floor space) Total 458,000 square feet; 2 Indicate area of specific uses: Office 68,000 Manufacturing N/A Retail 6.000 Other Industrial N/A — Warehouse N/A Institutional (Hospital) 314,000 Light industrial N/A Agricultural N/A Long term Care 70,000 Other Commercial (specify) N/A Building Height(s) Phase I Medical Office Building - 16 feet; Phase II Hospital - 42 feet; Phase III Building additions _ - 56 feet. 8. Permits and Approvals Requires List all known local, state, and federal permits, approvals, and funding required: Unit of Government Type of Application Status City of Shakopee Rezoning Not Submitted — Subdivision Plat Not Submitted Wetlands Conservation Act Permit Not Submitted Notice of Intent (NPDES) Not Submitted Work in Public Right-of-Way — (for driveways) Not Submitted Building Permits Not Submitted Scott County County Road Access Permit Not Submitted MNDOT Heliport License Not Submitted — Federal Aviation Form 7480 - Airspace/Landing Pad Not Submitted Administration Site Review 9. Land Use Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands. Discuss the compatibility of the project with adjacent and nearby land uses; indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify any potential environmental hazard due to past land uses, such as soil contamination _ or abandoned storage tanks. The land has recently been in agricultural crop land uses; information available indicates that historically it has generally been used for agricultural purposes. There is a line of trees that generally define the north boundary of the site. The site topography is characterized as softly rolling; vertical relief is on the order of 12',with surface drainage primarily north and south with the surface drainage break approximately through — the middle of the site. 10. Cover Types Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development (before and after totals should be equal): Before After (in acres) Before After Types 2 to 8 Wetlands 0 0 Urban/Suburban Lawn 0 46.9 Wooded/Forest 0 0 Landscaping Brush/Grassland/Trees .4 0 Impervious Surface 0 12 Cropland 58.5 0 Other (describe)* 1.1 1.1 _ TOTAL 60ac. 60 ac. *paved highway shoulder and ditch grasses 3 11. Fish, Wildlife,and Ecologically Sensitive Resources a. Describe fish and wildlife resources on or near the site and discuss how they would be affected by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. There are no fish resources on or near the site. The wildlife resources on the site are limited by past agricultural uses of the property. Some upland game animals may exist from time to time on the site primarily within the existing trees and brush located along the north property line. b. Are there any state-listed endangered, threatened, or special-concern species; rare plant communities; colonial waterbird nesting colonies; native prairie or other rare habitat; or other sensitive ecological resources on or near the site: [ ] Yes [X] No If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the resources was conducted. Describe measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. 12. Physical Impacts on Water Resources Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alternative (dredging, filling, stream division, outfall structure, diking, impoundment) of any surface water (lake, pond, wetland, stream, drainage _ ditch)? [ ] Yes [X] No If yes, identify the water resource to be affected and describe: the alteration, including the construction process; volumes of dredged or fill material; area affected; length of stream diversion; water surface area affected; timing and extent of fluctuations in water surface elevations; spoils disposal sites; and proposed mitigation measures to minimize impacts. 13. Water Use a. Will the project involve the installation or abandonment of any wells? [ ] Yes [X] No For abandoned wells give the location and Unique well number. For new wells,or other previously unpermitted wells,give the location and purpose of the well and the Unique well number (if known). b. Will the project require an appropriation of ground or surface water (including dewatering)? [ ] Yes [X] No If yes, indicate the source, quantity, duration, purpose of the appropriation., and DNR water appropriation permit number of any existing appropriation. Discuss the impact of the appropriation on ground water levels. c. Will the project require connection to a public water supply? [X] Yes [ ] No If yes, identify the supply, the DNR water appropriation permit number of the supply, and the quantity to be used. Water service would be provided to the site by installation of a 12" main along County Road 17 from a point just north of Vierline Drive, a distance of approximately 0.6 miles. Because the St. Francis site is within the first high elevation service (1-HES) district, initial water service would include a booster pump, either at a proposed well house along. County Road 17 (Marschall Rd.) or at the hospital site. Ultimately, the 1-HES district would have a separate water system including storage tank and well. 14. Water-related Land Use Management Districts Does any part of the project site involve a shoreland zoning district, a delineated 100-year flood plain, or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river land use district? [ ] Yes [X] No. If yes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts with other users or fish and wildlife resources. 15. Water Surface Use Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body? [ ] Yes [X] No If yes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts with other users or fish and wildlife resources. 16. Soils Approximate depth (in feet) to: Ground water: minimum * average 50' Bedrock: Minimum 50' average 50' Describe the soils on the site, giving SCS classifications, if known. (SCS interpretations and soil boring logs need not be attached.) *No water encountered within 21'of surface Twenty (20) standard penetration borings were performed across the site to access soil conditions. The borings indicated a generalized profile of 2 to 4 feet of silty and clayey topsoil to weathered soil veneer 4 overlying predominately sandy soils to the 21 foot boring depth. Per the Unified Soil Classification System, the topsoils classified as CL, SC or SM. The underlaying sandy soils classified almost entirely as SP, with limited SP-SM immediately under the topsoil at one location. No ground water was encountered within 21 feet of grade. Based on published information, first geological contact would likely be the Prairie du Chien limestone at a depth of about 50 feet. 17. Erosion and Sedimentation Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to be moved: acres 60 ; cubic yards 150.000 Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map. None Describe the erosion and sedimentation measures to be used during and after construction of the project. There will be four erosion control measures implemented; rip-rap access drives for construction equipment; soil ridges for indirect runoff areas; silt fences and/or vegetative strips for sheet flow drainage areas; '— temporary sedimentation ponds with baffled and/or screened outlet structures. The above control measures will be constructed in accordance with the "Best Management Practices" 1990 soil erosion manual. The City will require the re-establishment of vegetative cover as soon as practicable through the subdivision platting and building permit processes. 18. Water Quality - Surface Water Runoff a. Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project. Describe methods to be used to manage and/or treat runoff. Please see 18b. b. Identify the route(s) and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site. Estimate the impact of the runoff on the quality of the receiving water. (If the runoff may affect a lake consult "EAW Guidelines" about whether a nutrient budget analysis is needed.) The site areas has recently been agricultural. Since the surface soils of the site are somewhat cohesive and unprotected, runoff during significant precipitation events would be comparatively high; a runoff coefficient on the order 0.5- 0.6 may be applicable. Peak site runoff could be 120 cfs or more. with a high level of suspended solids. Development of the site will include various storm water management/treatment provisions consistent with the "City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan" as applicable to the Mill Pond watershed. Those provisions will incorporate the following basic standards of performance and physical size: - Peak rate of storm water discharge will be limited to 0.33 cfs per acre of contributing drainage area, or a peak discharge of 20 cfs. Storm water storage on-site shall accommodate a 100-year 24 hour runoff volume above the outlet from a retention area while meeting a discharge peak of 20 cfs. - The retention area shall have a surface area of at least 1% of the untreated contributing drainage area at discharge elevation, and a nominal pond bottom at lease 3'below discharge elevation. The routing of storm water as discharged from the retention area shall be to an existing swale near • the southwest property corner. This swale presently conducts 60 to 70% of total site runoff. 19. Water Quality - Wastewaters. a. Describe sources, quantities, and composition (except for normal domestic sewage) of all sanitary and industrial wastewaters produced or treated at the site. No corrosives or unusual contaminates are expected from the proposed development. A neutralizing basin will be provided in the laboratory. Waste products as applicable, will be neutralized before introduction into the sanitary sewer. Biohazardous material will be incinerated off site. b. Describe any waste treatment methods to be used and give estimates of composition after treatment, or if the project involves on-site sewage systems, discuss the suitability of the site conditions for each systems. Identify 5 receiving waters (including ground water) and estimate the impact of the discharge on the quality of the receiving waters. (If the discharge may affect a lake consult "EAW Guidelines" about whether a nutrient budget analysis is needed.) As noted above, laboratory corrosives will be neutralized in a neutralizing basin before entering the sanitary sewer system. As laboratory procedures evolve, it is expected that the use of corrosive reagents will eventually diminish, thereby making procedures safer for laboratory personnel. Photographic processing involves the use of oxidizing and reducing agents, some of which are toxic and/or corrosive. Again, in intention is to eliminate the use of x-ray. c. If wastes will be discharged into a sewer system or pretreatment system, identify the system and discuss the ability of the system to accept the volume and composition of the wastes. Identify any improvements which will be necessary. It is expected that the impact of any chemicals entering the sewage system after treatment, will be negligible. 20. Ground Water- Potential for Contamination a. Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water: 50' or greater below grade. minimum; N/A average. b. Describe any of the following site hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site map: sinkholes; shallow limestone formations/karst conditions; soils with high infiltration rates; abandoned or unused wells. Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards. MOM There are no site hazards that would degrade ground water. c. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present on the project site and identify measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating ground water. Below grade oil storage tank as noted under 21b below. Storage tank will be double walled glass- fiber-reinforced polyester meeting ASTM D4021. Tank will be equipped with an electronic tank monitoring system to safeguard the integrity of the tank installation system. 21. Solid Wastes; Hazardous Wastes; Storage Tanks a. Describe the types , amounts, and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes to be generated, including animal manures, sludges and ashes. Identify the method and location of disposal. For projects generating municipal solid waste indicate if there will be a source separation plan; list type(s) and how the project will be modified to allow recycling. Handling and transportation of radioactive material will be performed in compliance with Nuclear Regulatory Commission and State regulations. Use of corrosives, confined to hospital laboratory procedures, will be minimal: they will be neutralized in the lab after use. Biohazardous (infectious) materia, blood, urine and tissue will be placed in biohazard bags, containerized and shipped to an incinerator. Collection, handling and disposal will be performed in accordance with MPCA regulations and State Health Department policy. The estimated amount of such material is 200 pounds per day. b. Indicate the number, location, size, and use of any above or below ground tanks to be used for storage of petroleum products or other materials (except water). One 20,000 gallon oil storage tank below grade would be double wall fiberglass and located near the heating plant in the service drive. One above ground oxygen tank (approximately 5' dia, 10' high) 22. Traffic Parking spaces added 980 Existing spaces (if project involves expansion) None Estimated total Average Daily Traffic (ADT) generated 3599 in '95,6320 in '05 Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated (if known) and its timing: See below. For each affected road indicate the ADT and the directional distribution of traffic with and without the project. Provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on the affected roads and describe any traffic improvements which will he necessary. 6 '95 peak hour 7:00- 9:00 a.m. -05 peak hour 7:00- 9:00 a.m. 1851 Enter 649 Exit 2989 Enter 1027 Exit Mmr '95 peak hour 4:00- 6:00 p.m. '05 peak hour 4:00- 6:00 p.m. 1016 Enter 1077 Exit 1546 Enter 1811 Exit The expected construction of the Shakopee Bypass beginning in 1993, includes a diamond interchange and lane additions at County Road 17 immediately north of the St. Francis site; these improvements will result in a potential capacity of 40,000 ADT. The Scott County Highway Department has projected County Road 17 _ traffic volume to be approximately 12,000 ADT for the 2010. The City of Shakopee is planning a collector street which will parallel the Bypass and border the north edge of the St. Francis site. The estimated capacity of this street is 5,000 ADT. Access to the site will be provided from County Road 17 (main public entrance) and the future collector street (emergency, employee, and service traffic). Given that the projected traffic volume for the St. Francis Medical Campus is 6,300 ADT, the estimated capacities of area streets and highways should be able to accommodate the trips generated by the proposed St. Francis Medical Center. County and City staff have met with the applicants to review the various traffic issues facing this project. The spacing of the future collector street and the main hospital entrance from the south Bypass ramps have been established to provide adequate room for future road improvements such as traffic controls and turning lanes. Through the rezoning and subdivision platting processes, appropriate traffic improvements will be constructed for this project. 23. Vehicle-related air emissions Provide an estimate of the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality, including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. (If the project involved 500 or more parking spaces, consult "EAW Guidelines" about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed.) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff has been contacted to determine if an Indirect Source Permit (ISP) is required. New parking facilities with less than 1,000 cars are exempt from the ISP process (Ch. 7001.1280). Since an ISP is not required and traffic congestion will generally not result due to the traffic system design, an air quality analysis should not be required. There should not be a significant decrease in air quality from vehicle-related sources. 24. Stationary source air emissions Will the project involve any stationary sources of air emissions (such as boilers or exhaust stacks)? [X] Yes [ ] No If yes, describe the sources, quantities, and composition of the emissions; the proposed air pollution control devices; the quantities and composition of the emissions after treatment; and the effects on air quality. MPCA staff has been contracted regarding stationary source air emissions. A permit is required from the MPCA when a project exceeds 25 tons per year of emissions. At peak heating load, stack emissions are estimated as not more than 2.O lbs./hour of particulates, 50 ppm CO, and 10.0 lbs./hour SO2, respectively. Incineration of biohazardous material will not be done on the site. The boilers and stacks used will meet the new federal standards and will therefore have negligible effects on air quality. No air pollution control devises are anticipated. Based on this information MPCA staff did not anticipate that this project would need a stationary source permit. No air pollution control devices are anticipated. _ 25. Will the project generate dust, odors, or noise during construction and/or operation? [X] Yes [ ] No If yes, describe the sources, characteristics, duration, and quantities or intensity, and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Also identify the locations of sensitive receptors in the vicinity and estimate the impacts on these receptors. The predominant soils of the site area are not likely to create dust conditions during construction. However, if dust conditions do result from limited fine grained soils,watering of construction haul roads will be required by the City to limit dust conditions. The existing agricultural land use currently exposes a majority of the sites and has not created adverse impacts on adjacent properties. The future turf cover over a majority of the site will reduce exposed soils and dust. Earthmoving equipment and large trucks will be the principal noise sources during the periods of construction. Thereafter, noise will he limited to passenger automobiles, service trucks, ambulances and 7 limited helicopter traffic. The nearest receptors within 1/4 mile of the site are seven residences and two businesses along the side of County Road 17. During construction taking as a possible cumulative noise level the combination of three scrapers (88 dBA at 50'),the sum is estimated at 74 dBA at 200',which would affect houses or businesses when earthmoving is occurring immediately adjacent to County Road 17. The daytime standard for residences (NCA-1) is L10 = 65 dBA, L50 = 60 dBA. The building envelopes should provide at least 15 dBA attenuation in mitigating of impact, even with some windows open. No vibration or impulse sources of significant magnitude, such as pile driving are expected. Hours of construction operation are anticipated to be 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. weekdays only, for a period of 6 to 10 weeks for site excavation and rough grading. Building construction noise is not expected to exceed applicable state standards. The project is not expected to create any adverse odors. 26. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site: a. archeological, historical, or architectural resources? [ ] Yes [X] No b. prime or unique farmlands? [ ] Yes [X] No c. designated parks, recreation areas, or trails? [ ] Yes [X] No d. scenic views and vistas? [ ] Yes [X] No e. other unique resources? [ ] Yes [X] No If any items are answered Yes, describe the resource and identify any impacts on the resource due to the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. There are no known occurrences of rare species or natural features on the site. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) has been contacted for the review of the Natural Heritage Database. Attachment 5 is a letter from Ms. Bonita Eliason, of the MDNR, representing the results of the database search. Due to the predominant agricultural use of the site an on-site biological survey was not performed. 27. Will the project create adverse visual impacts? (Examples include: glare from intense lights; lights visible in wilderness areas; and large visible plumes from cooling towers or exhaust stacks.) [ ] Yes [X] No If yes, explain. The parking lots will be lighted using directional lights at the perimeter and cut off shields as required to reduce light from trespassing off of the site. Parking areas, outdoor storage areas and mechanical equipment will need to be screened as required by the City's Zoning Ordinance. 28. Compatibility with plans Is the project subject to an adopted local comprehensive land use plan or any other _ applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of a local, regional, state, or federal agency? [X] Yes [ ] No If yes, identify the applicable plan(s), discuss the compatibility of the project with the provisions of the plan(s), and explain how any conflicts between the project and the plan(s) will he resolved. If no, explain. A comprehensive plan amendment was approved on June 25, 1992 by the Metropolitan Council in order to allow for the expansion of the urban service area to include the St. Francis site. The City's Land Use Plan was amended to incorporate institutional uses for this specific area in the City. Attachment 6 illustrates the amended Land Use Plan and the expanded urban service area. The proposed medical center is compatible with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Plan. _ 29. Impact on Infrastructure and Public Services Will new or expanded utilities, roads, other infrastructure, or public services be required to serve the project? [X] Yes [ ] No If yes,describe the new or additional infrastructure/services needed. (Any infrastructure that is a "connected action" with respect to the project must be assessed in this EAW; see "EAW Guidelines" for details.) The site can be served by public water and sewer with extensions from the existing City system. The Shakopee Bypass could separate the St. Francis site from the existing water and sewer lines. In order to provide for the connections for City services City staff is working with the applicants to design the appropriate utility systems for the phased project. For sewer service, an interim sewer line will be constructed to the VIP Interceptor located north of the Bypass. The interim sewer line will he constructed prior to or in conjunction with this section of the Bypass. The interim sewer line will be sized to accommodate the medical campus until the area can he served by its permanent sewer line, the South Shakopee Trunk Line. This major sewer 8 project is estimated to be constructed to this area by 1995. Water services will be similarly designed to provide services necessary to the phased project. Please refer to Attachment 7 and 8. A future collector street will be constructed with the medical center along the north boundary and continue eastward to County Road 83. 30. Related Developments; Cumulative Impacts a. Are future stages of this development planned or likely? [X] Yes [ ] No If yes, briefly describe future stages, their timing, and plans for environmental review. b. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? [ ] Yes [X] No If yes, briefly describe the past development, its timing, and any past environmental review. c. Is other development anticipated on adjacent lands or outlots? [ ] Yes [X] No If yes,briefly describe the development and its relationship to the present project. d. If a, b, or c were marked Yes, discuss any cumulative environmental impacts resulting from this project and the other development. _ a. The project will be a multi-phased development consisting of medical offices and an acute care 70- bed hospital in Phases I and II. Expansions of the medical offices and hospital as well as the development of other health care facilities are proposed after the year 2000. The following table lists proposed square footages for various uses and the number of employees projected for each phase: MOB (Clinic) MOB Acute Care Hospital Estimated Employees Phase I (1994-95) 17,000 SF Hospital 80 FTES* Phase II (1994-96) 34,000 SF 17,000 SF 160,000 SF 440 FTES* Later Phases (2000-05) 34,000 SF 34,000 SF 320,000 SF 750 FTES* *Full Time Equivalents The subject site covers 60 acres. The intent of the large site is to provide for the extended, long term growth needs for the regional medical center for up to 50 years. The buildings have been located near the center of the site so as to allow for other healthcare related facilities to occur in close proximity to the medical center in the future. The proposed campus type facility will allow St. Francis to continue to provide for the future regional health care needs. The proposed phasing concept reflects the best estimate as to what uses would occur on the site after the year 2000. 31. Other Potential Environmental Impacts If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts which were not addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. The site plan shown on Attachment 3a illustrates potential flight paths to the emergency helicopter land pad. All flights for this facility are intended to be hospital related. The applicants project a total of 12 flights per year. The landing pad and the air space provisions are required to be approved by the Federal Aviation _ Administration and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT). Flight path corridors will be established in the City's review process of the project for the helicopter facility. _ 32. SUMMARY OF ISSUES (This section need not he completed if the EAW is being done for EIS scoping; instead, address relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document which must accompany the EAW.) List any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is commenced. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues, including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. St. Francis Regional Medical Center is ars important medical health care facility for the residents of Shakopee _ and the surrounding area. Serving the general public, it is considered an institutional land use in the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan. The existing hospital facility, located southwest of downtown Shakopee, has become obsolete in terms of providing for today's health care services. The building design does not lend itself to renovation, nor does the surrounding urbanized development permit expansion. As a result, for St. Francis to continue in the region's health care industry, relocation has become necessary. 9 After a lengthy site selection process, St. Francis selected the 60 acre parcel located southeast of the Shakopee Bypass and County Road 17. An important part of the selection process for the new medical center was automobile access. The proposed site is located adjacent to a minor arterial street (County Rd. —" 17). A future collector is proposed to be adjacent to the north side of the 60 acre tract. Being located just off the bypass would improve the hospital's accessibility for both emergency and daily traffic. _ Access to the hospital and other area properties is being carefully designed to maintain efficient traffic flows in the Shakopee Bypass/County Road 17 intersection. All access points (streets and driveways) to County Road 17 will be approved by the County Engineer. Access to City streets will be approved by the City. The proposed site is located in the Mill Pond Watershed. Developments in this watershed are subject to the stormwater policies and regulations as established in the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. Prior to the release of any building permits, detailed information on the design of the storm water drainage facilities for the new hospital will be reviewed by the City Engineer for their conformance with these regulations. As the planning process for the medical center continues, other applicable local, state, and federal requirements will be addressed as appropriate. Certifications by the RGU (all 3 certifications must be signed for EQB acceptance of the EAW for publication of notice in the EQB Monitor) A. I hereby certify that the informations ccptain in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my /C knowledge. Signature 41,444 B. I hereby certify that the project described in this EAW is the complete project and there are no other projects, project stages, or project components, other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as "connected actions" or ."pha c ns," as defined, respectively, at Minn. Rules, pts. 4410.0200,Subp. 9B and subp. 60. Signature C. I hereby certify thaj copies g th com feted EAW are being sent to all points on the official EQB EAW distribution list. Signature K — Title of signer Q Date ,73/4L 10 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Environmental Assessment Worksheet _ Proposed St. Francis Regional Medical Center November, 1992 Attachment No. Title 1 County Map 2 USGS Map 3a, 3b 1995 and 2005 Site Plans 4 Existing Land Use/Zoning Map 5 Minnesota Natural Heritage Database Review 6 Amended Land Use Plan 7 Interim Sanitary Sewer Service g Interim Water Service • 11 ATTACHMENT 1 Minnesota Valley Es.Restoration Project Minnesota Chanhassen National W Murphy's Landing R efug `_� t r\Htoe R-��" t — E - ' t • .^ ' m� FAIL 1 "E‘' /..... `Vt: -"dilliIllijilihk :l MEI i 111211111111111111111116.. ek.,. Dovv..Ns AREND y Hili. ,2?r. - Z —� ;St° D Illll® _=`�' �� _ . ----: - Shakopee Bypass cs� ' ^ c 32 7 QPM � —•— Q1 !AV NO7N^S7 _ _-- - - ."-- L L A " 1. --i --- ' AST.fANO s_ - I ^ eZ 2QEa ---- _ -fit - Shakopee _ ,.[ JACKSI'N al _ LI�� .25. Y P��`• :E < 'k • = ;E E. - ems``', 'e �. t K „ K - " 5 _ 126th 5-W. . S i t e < : t- 5- E.r _ - I t 13- G 1 A Y c r r/ - - • Lam-. 'JS"irr - 3 c S= '�\. __5':_ . 2 _ ""�•< 11 0. I NOF 1 Sn LNNON t • '.,•....--. - -_-•._rte . C C Ya 1 C_K 7C - - • " .`.=.tea �y 2 P LB40 MAVEN i� C:a 2.50.: SNAON < �_ - =' ,� .14 .2: . 1! �.� S_. w00?:UCK f._�._riz ' ,, 1 J"....w.�,,-' c � _ _ u. tom-^ }! :_ - :�-._ vim.='4__= =r% . "� .; �1 3...m.---7- —--- —CtIc.-.!-- —,....._ L. ,'\ 5- Sr... r-1` _ ,��... �40tAcSI v ' - ,..„...........„... .................: i.....L...„R „0.:.....: _ _,, ,....,.„.s... . s „...„..,,____. =......—.„......,...„;-.,,‘,....,,A,-...,_:,.„....„. L si 1 . h .-, .-- 3- �1 w._it..`�"�• fr ter' :v y �� <<^ `N�: •"'" `� =.= Lake=1=1.: d . n sc W. 1 " t�_.�: . �W,,T f�• o L . '4P Ei-,7.19', . I �� z_ _3 --wisesa_:sr:3 . _-3?-7 .--":7.. l'' '"- -..-:-.,-,-- L-T---T-.7---::::--,.7. - .41 %%II t.-C.. ---42 - MN 1 �: )= rte. • 1.--- ` "`t s s MarystownI �. Spring_- _� � � t ; —� ,__ -'.'�� 160te c-�S. YY. ■ is '^ a t v - -- ... ', -. � _ - _ ,' -- �s�y_ / x/:71 .1•R[ t 1 c r� _ - � .0 ' •g 5,7 r 'W �� _ j2 •-•.;•.-.'� _ GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP OF J� � -.,�." • a°mitis B-Y. - �a7 .... \__ :. ----sc SCOU COUNTY v 5� s�..�<<.[ , :. ;.I s. F_d MINNESOTA _ _- iv 1988 =. _ ��S. ;�- SLR_ :w :Iw V 4.. < G _ 4 10 ...,,, e . -- ,..s,... „..___ ,a,. , _am: : e--- - " vol !Z' ,:;4,- 0 as. >I_•. t' / - - , i NILES _ �" _< K • / e- x 1 r IIIIIIIIII > i ' ^• 321,` /.... -�_ =_ _ =-��_ ti,,____,. . ATTACHMENT N7l6?!;:\\\,•,, /fr ( - - . IL ._ z _ ti - ,,, ,. I 707 I// ISHAKOPEE 1• '�i \ e =_ - -.CARVER CO ni _� \ �/� �BOCVDtRY — SCOTT CO Z ir^ �_� "G__77:. L-.....„:„.. _____ ..__,_ . • .2,_. .. 70,-,. •._--..--- ,...--.... 7. -- ,,,, e 7....:----___440 - t ,- , -_.--• ---A ---• - - • - --- \t1 \tir. _ - - _ � • ,1•C, _ —_ fGr�-- .Y^�; :a•_•,` �" Mme Mit ' , .1•,.. - ~{i Gravel Pits e - - I�.�ierr -s:. s •• 4� .4 -1♦ 4__ .� t.. .�n l• - 750 S -�- •, 1�• �+:1` • _ � �Nil 151'•=" ' •1 •. \ 1 i Valley 'fir.)� T -- 36+)1,L._,____,,::::::73,,,::-.:::— -m' vs 10.1411,:t.---7- - - " \ ' v I _ter— ,/.. IX ys .:••1 It_;. P t II �_,......„......:s...‘"......7. . IarNU _ •Soi+.I •- _•, ` t . `�M L_ { a.1_pi _,,„,,,,c. .. , = ‘,. _ ii,7----v_Tie,,i.- zr, ...-..--- • ,,,...... \___.7 ......., ------....___. : _ .....„ ,..„ .... ..,.. . ._. . ..._ -i; _ ;, ,"mai��i I'atav2fP t , �\ X75 - r---I-I-.1. .1- I i 12---7--:-. ---- ,. , 40Wa.tecx liy—Nr. =.--/--• h ,StMarys i .... I :iffy, ,...--..y.,. :1- ,,.., . .....---... _,__: :. .... AtC"-- " ---- .• , . . I :.- a_ "• --.....i. \\ ` i --- -�- I � - _ ;C� 800 ^ � -��' �"�-%,te . • SI .. '; >a'Z r--- Ts. , :_, e $•�`'"`•' • - r Gray J r .. ;P' +el.Pits \ I S �a am, `' 7sa L ----,. 1 ____ ,...., .0 e• �-- __ ^; _ , • * -'--- Shakopee Bypass -__. L __`,rte •f'l • ..---- . �ae0 -' ``��• �, . l'• ill • i ' F.-, ----_` r1 9 _ - I -- __ - - / a .-lam .G. \ ;815 vr-.r�av�l- � + --_` - � 27 � _ ams=n�• �$/` - �C;.' i---__. ---'- a - • 89L % \/',-�� 1....6...-----e7=?A'eLsi - .--'-;•;-:: 41-.•:•-.-1"--5 '-;.. . --a-. -:----, -: it--.--- .. •,-,, _ ,,,,,z -:SHAKOPEE, MINN. `W , - • EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. a S.. .-LA-C MIvN_-vNiCA IS G(:A^,RA\GLSi _,;.-1,.....,.-.1-.� SW/4 MINNEAPOLIS IS"GUADRINO_E L.. - .71; - = N4-=_—W9330/7.5 t ---7'-'.---4112_,-•_ \ - '. N4445—W9322.5/7.5 - _ -^. � `co- ROAD CLASSIFICATION 8s' \ •L)--,o-, ----- -. ; ',., .J.. j --..A<-,• Heavy-duty. Light-duty__._ \ • 4 _.\\ %` --'� - Medium duty.. .. - Unmproved dirt ' ..• — — 909 ; 0 U.S. Route OState Route ^��, ". --_-__T---`,. • .7.--.:.:;j\--:•‘ w\ -_ j , - _ -^'= r . 3 . l��...c) - - - • • I. WOO q l:.CC :t}:•� 3:•31.3. 4000 SVC) ,r v0 ;WO SEE' :d► ..^��1. —, . , 5 - .l .o L. 5TEC --I----=�ti"� co H • z • W C.) j ' 11,..' , (...,,,__..„,m_.„ • , i . . II. .,. H -Oaf ... .. . !def: ...- ;c�:., J. .':.. . .- .... .-2 � 1 , a , g0 9:. is ?co 0 1 L:r +` O 00 �' a .--J____.�., . . - • (fir . ./‘ ,,:i . • „., .,,. .. ! . i . �, i, 1 • �' • �000v) ,- ° - . Lli �•:'' 1,o- r z _.-- •)1111 2a n JI • 1-V 11'►: Ii14 Z ii t1 _ —' I li; o1. I "`1 ,;-:,T • .. • illi., ..- ,.„,,,• i • ,. h. a - -- - -..rn -.P ..., • . CTI o Aik0t, NI \ . • „. IL ... • 4‘,.1. .,......i_ici_ fli; :.7.; I ; , I Y ol. �I 1, cc/) �;I:I:r----) .1 ' Q• EIEII -)�.'.. - r, , / / .Q M 4 w • I,p,I K I. r �•i ]'; I., 0 0 I.o 0 ..... ...... .c X11 11* li : 1 ; 1.......i! ', 101; 11 -- -:"-i----...• ._....,,, 1' f I'0.'1: li'', ..rn r.) t 4 L ; i ! N '' ! ? \I of ¢ . 4 N ..1 6I \ . I\i i • \ii. l;. Q J Qtj , ;p o 1 0 \ ...: — { , q ,. r ymr , L...'; i i ; J 1_- - i • 1(.6)11\ ' AkO L (i 1).1 o .. a . . d i .. 1 - [)' ...1. I C) 5 6. ' ry .! . ;.I :.. . • g . ______&„_1 _ 1 . ‘- i.\ o ' li1, a .l _, \ !,• 16±,. .,N,Da,2,,ecteJ _ . , '.!,.:.... . lif - 1)) O. • 8 / — • , / tl _____..„1 I.-•- -, ..__._ J k ',..,1;. !- \ 5j J f, • \ \ J at F G L1 lLi •i I �, OG 4��' 6 • : I .. :': •. ° 8 1 • ! CI \kJ@_ .______. . .4, < i; 1. 1':1:::f '.'...: .• -• ' -. - • . • ". • • Ifs' ' �.� .,.r, __. — — —._...— . ——y._— E 1.`;� __ _ E 2 < 4,1:0 N . • —: 1� .�t�■; V ATTACHMENT 4 1 Urban Residential ■` I. c 1� URTtJtIfUtT Mims /7n • LLb0E . , _______Lr. z ) I .8 ,.€ 1 !T. Ilium - .- ;111-4 ; 64. � r z, '1 ) ���\ ♦ 4. N' 5 — .r • - ; is ( ..- Urban Residential R • AG _ � %\J '(N —, ---,of h�"E • we f . •it ., =-� 111166. a Shakopee Bypass x-- •r p= � C.:VO S'. : 1 -� - - ..._.iN ti 67 _�� �1TT17 .1 M 0 S T. ! i -' I �\ ;ice R:. 4 N T— _.-;-j- _ �t� X7LLS ADC ,....._i / I 1_ - _ Fes 1 Q AG Af- i t t y I I 99 I I I v1 ' ' Cropland I ilin--° gpii;giiiiiggi , , AG $ ANNONQa Cropland 1 , , 1 3 r.. , , , \\ °t Q ••••••••••_,... = I __ .. i l? 1 '4 =: ... .r., ...... Site ; ! �, � �r ' ;. . i iv. — w S7 w1 CO RQ Tg b _�wc Ca , i 12t rm.St r: I I I I t j ‘e'N t.LS:CC 1 1{ --:iroeCwsa S 5";6= j 1 •_C�S Rural Residential 1 I CC PC 77 ,u 1 I ... I a L L c II N` ft I 1 _ 114, Ir - ' i to ' 1 -I 20 1 I �� tt , s 1)) \ TRAILS r� z f /J ✓y ` \ A00.M - - R1 ��� y S ;i` ,� 1I : ��-' •) I . Residential r✓ ` wE 0' ACRE•. — `�� -- Lam..✓ cokeC. ," 11 . -',12' l'4 - . 25 v / , .:z....., 41 ./._,N....„2-2.:_i r—/ • 1 I -,, C,T — — -. GF F: I _ H H ATTACHMENT 5 STATE OF Elk.r] CE - DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURC = 0 -- 500 — 500 LAFAYETTE ROAD • Sr PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55155-40 — DNR INFORMATIONf �vv (612) 296.6157 OCT 3 0'19Z — October 28, 1992 C • I10A Jim Husnik '— Hammel Green and Abrahamson, Inc. _ 1201 Harmon Place Minneapolis, MN 55403-3944 Re: St. Francis Regional Medical Center — Dear Mr. iusnik: —_ The Minnesota Natural Heritage database has been reviewed to determine if any rare plant or animal species or other significant natural, features are known to occur within one mile of the above referenced project. Based on this review, there are no knoyn occurrences of rare species or natural features in the area searched. The Natural Heritage database is maintained by the Natural Heritage Program and the Nongame Wildlife Program, units within the Section of Wildlife, Department of Natural Resources. It is the most complete source of data on Minnesota' s rare, endangered, or otherwise significant plant and animal species, plant communities, and other natural features, and is used in fostering better understanding and protection of these rare features. The information in the database is drawn from many parts of Minnesota, and is constantly being updated, but it is not based on a comprehensive survey of the state. Therefore, there are currently many significant natural features present in the state which are not represented by the database. We are in the process of addressing this problem via the Minnesota County Biological Survey. a county-by-county inventory of rare natural features, which is now underway. _ However, Scott county has not been surveyed, and is not scheduled for survey within the next fey years. Because there has not been an on-site survey of the biological resources of the project area, it is possible that ecologically significant features exist for which we have no record. Thank you for consulting us on this matter, and for your interest in minimizing impacts on Minnesota' s rare resources. Please be aware that review by the Natural Heritage and Nongame: Programs focuses only on rare natural features. It does not constitute review or approval by the Department of Natural Resources as a whole. c 9 H > H F' . 1-21 1 iiC: T — e• 1-� — ' 2 FF' I 1 4 - - • 2 An invoice for the work completed will be forthcoming. You are being _ billed for map and computer search hserd ogaAdnciristrationientist ein Marchw. , are done quarterly by the State Department September, and December. Sincerely, Bonita Eliason Endangered HeritageSpecies andEnvironmental WildlifeReview Coordinator Programs Natural 612/297-2276 ATTACHMENT 6 y�Qr_ y� .I \�ywit w\ Ll 11 i] i 1 l l �,t..,+, . . ---. .. .,—:.v.-c:�_cr=?a-3-" 77r .–_rr_ i.– ';i.j� S���'•,:" s.•,.ai ,:c��3-- MLE: '..+:ter .i 1") = 3 i i _ r _ I� =�' il\ ii'. iii;3l1{ lli 1171 iiiiiiiiiiiiiil 1 ta--:...-----nz :-.-4—:A --i--Y.- .7:-.7.'--:', ila-A44/ — — !b n ti11111i1 i ill. ... • Jill: „ II , , IIV1i t; I.. ...,/III,IIttl:l I• �:;;�„ �. _ t }-fir. .,i,tltl �.l. l U �f SF�` F ta SI r • • (v t _ 1=== = t--- in \ MI ' \ ..- • ro 1 L i 1 — CITY , of SHAKOPEE ...Es......-7A Urbanizing Sector p c c5E'. CAS{NAGz :::AAIccA Proposed 'lra:^.sporatlon 2 0 0 0 Land Use Plan vcINC:,AL ..;.-_Rut SF SIG` :1:-.V.:!• ?=S:rc` .:%.i. uAa.N SERVICE AAE.3. AMP.' Mc -, - IN 7E.a.mty I::- ;ATEAt1t .^. �'""T""i�:.C� mt af.,:iY :.`577,::.t FAI NCA .1n7EFI... : :NS u •:N" L Map 12 C„l___ :A _ 1111111 - ---:;IL-• --- "11 iLi:.....•;'i..- ::.i11,f,1.7-.7---;:4".--L41:--."--.--1-;t14e.o1'1::-r11:.-.-..•.:-.--.. 7.--.-7I4.. 1?I---.--:•-"-4•t,-.'-•-...i--"-4-'t.,-...-V1•4es P‘--.--"-`•*.-7,-•.4-1-••t-1r,-.---.7.-'..-Et":-.e11I,.•_iu.!- :;e"-..-7'*'•:.',"--'•T•I-.i\_ti.•-• .r••.Tr,.•..,7-•:,: 1...'.7....._-1=I1 .,40 1-'1trr:•.-...-:-.:"".1-".-..4".-.2470ii1-.-1..-..:'i.2..:.1g.if1.,; L.-.:-:.•.2...".?.1iI11i,."..••...`it.-.t".P+IE'.6-1---•..--.....1-1ir......t•:_:.-.:5-.E-...1.•4.'/f:;L1t_"-.-.•:-.._*.":..-.11.t.1..:"1i.....-.!_-.„-."Z-.*A.•:....".r1L16-,-1./i›.- -4.-,i1,.• i..*„,/,.•-•1I.)". .7-:./1,<.•A..„\...„/.4\i4•','-.,,1,:!);/. ..k/,./‘;i..',.:;/7._.7...s-,/..7.,,7.. . , %7 1 ; .;•.,*:- i--. 1 ---. T..L.'_1 ; ;, 1 ;,. P.Z.71- tst 1-•••-•1 '1 •• ?L.-• . ,,•.•••• ...; ' IN,.. i %Ili-- I Ir.i-i r.... .,71".T.- N r,)•4;. P.: ! %tA i. , . .y, itslc-•ii; .:"..". .4.- • .•. L.-4 -J;--I? t >!;r--1'-'1-Trt` 1„..t. POO, • N. ,....,,e• r---__ •• 11. p. ' I*Vie ... .. ...4 ____,\I 1.............i.. I ..... .--.r.y . .:4 curl , 4 •.4.,..1•i , . , ..... ..., ,4-!i- - ,..,.:•.•A l* /4• t...4 .'i c-i..'AO., ....i. - •---•---- • k 11.::;ii. -;._..- --•!.X-N . ; ' :;36.-1...ki:Yi : , ...rib- - .•-•:i 00 tt:-..'s• 4•'. • • .1‘...1i., 'I'' . . , II, .• „,-;:c 0"; i_,,L,,, • 0. • • 1 , - ?-* 4,`;71..-) - • . .- - .r..1 i..-)...es.171 ;„„...",. ,.3.,G ,...46 1.....% , i t .0---,_.__)".-1:• i..r.ef .. 6, bt..! i : • ... '•,5 N.....e. 'K.! i•-.. 1:-../..."+1. -r--/I• . ••2 W(rif.......):r . . 1 ,. ....^ • i .4../)., 1.... T.• .Y, .,1 ; ....1 s. -.'s* •-•!•22.---.W.4"..7..4 :47:46.4"-•,-,7i 1 -i i *PI 1-4 ; i I .•t • (.•• !-1 • :',;''.....7% .,..../ 1. .. *'. 2 T : :•S- 1 464.:-*lair"' 42.1.f....frl '!L '''. .;.:.'"?-4.1 F.,1 .. ' 5.-----------• ` I I i .. ,..• ::::, - re•.-t? .2"..I.. ..... 74 •,,..1...1"1, 1 L....t' r-Li :1:: ta ..•• ... :?..44-:......-_0".fizt ------• - ------;--. -iii:ir, did 12-- - •-- is......_. -.. , ,111-!. if] ,•4 I \la' =INV. 7 7z.," .---,* ' - .__"'" r:::37 • !_rt.-. ' . k .. , --.. . . • .:.••..1- : 1 . ..- -- •••••••',tt.14 1 r. 1 0._ . . 5 , • .0• ...-. 1 ! 1 • ‘ \•.,, :: #i 't•I'ft • . . ,.. •.- % 1.a. r , ...11,._.11,-• •-••ti . '--, _4-.1,t ' . .• a• 1 ir. 7 es si-ar -________.--?-_----- ; • !.- r ' '2.; .- -:-•_--71'.' ' ii 8 . . i • ..-- .- ----. , v :iNv, -181.2. : _ - - .v. . : • . : - - ,..- _ •T• , - , 4,1 , 4...; i!.. • : , - - ;-------------- --7.-: -1-1------*-•--"*- -- -=-2: - ----- 7- -- • 13 1 -- iTesrv.78‘,0 i•-,•-)S - • -r • IQ _ _ - _ 1 _ - ;-• • 1 , - • 's-,- _ - , .I _ - - • • , , • . qk k, • - .. : . . • - - .., - • i•. . . imv.79t.0 - _ - -- - - v V- - • • - • • • , _ _ • ..... : . , 1=4 • • _ _ _ • .. 1 i • • : . -- - • : . I. Y. !4.0 - 1: 1 • • • , • • i . ii 1 . .Ropp.S.e.D SANITARY t-EWeR . - , ERVICE 'FOifk ST f R.,AtsiC IS 1. • 2 . •••••1. 1 • • • • . • sz 2. -. • - • t- ..7.?•:•/. E7-5-0 • ST FR<ANICIS MEDICAL:C. i•--;TER. --.• f' / / / CA PUS - ORO PE IRTY __ : /-1 -••A 1 1--- a' Tr4v. 62.7.6• . . . . . , . . ._... .. )-• N • . .,;1 • . . • \ O ci , • • _ _ • - . . _. . _..._._ ••- ...__ .. .._ • i 32_C• i 1 I ',...ALC 1., TO soo.. _ • - -• • - - - -_ • - - --- , . . . . • - - " • i • - i• . P R 0 POS ED i • , Q. too trA ev 5-7F\A/ER EXTENSIO -• _ .-• - - 'i_ �� _ : - - 1. � �� • �� - r ATTACHMENT 8 t i- --1 MOM . t' L I 1 MEMM r-1 ,,____..1-1-, v-L:-/ ii ! L.._!.. _-1 I..- 1......\1. 1 54* }`�"�^1` � . far--- =� I i R i � .• •- : –/41-1-1.2.4,3',.....1i.7...I I ; . i .k.7.• 1...„..„1_,/_.2 •S 1 f ‘,4 ; H •. i." 1 0:3 iv 74:4..;.__j_. . lc .. ; wit... 1 sx, .•Le_sz , ./,,..› ,‘,,t4/,: n� ». s i w+.� . ...-'5''''' 34� 1 __ � 1`II . • 1 r*:,;\:ir....„:„..-1 ,. i ,._ ' 5.57 i V ::•13 • --: — - f , :,......."7-:".._ , , • • L f7J �i• ��_1•: i . ' vtEr N' I. •Ne yr i . • • •....r-- _ _ P.; 5 • ' . J PROPOSED WA fle R RV 1 cE FOR ST FRAl1G1S Strg 1 ... . ... . . -.• . . (vi m ST..R/V./. 1.6.0C.AT)0 N) ._ .. _Li__.__...._—...._—_ _ •, - . .. ! • ST FRANCIS r; DICAL rErs/`ER• Ct', • - C.-AM PUS -•.PROP RTY'•• - ! 'i' . • • t' • - i - E •I •: _\ . • • . • " WATERS RV (CCE )(1'tNS141` Part 2 COMMENTS FROM REVIEWING AGENCIES — MADE ON THE - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR THE ST. FRANCIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Responsible Governmental Unit: City of Shakopee — 129 First Avenue East Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445-3650 — December 15, 1992 EAW COMMENTS RECEIVED PROPOSED ST. FRANCIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER DATE AGENCY 11-16-92 i. Metropolitan Council 11-20-92 2 . Scott County Planning Department 12-03-92 3 . Scott County Soil and Water Conservation District 12-04-92 4 . Scott County Highway Department 12-04-92 5. Minnesota Historical Society 12-04-92 6. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 12-04-92 7 . Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 12-08-92 8. United Stated Army Corps of Engineers _ 14AtMETROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Puck Centre. 230 East Fifth Street. St. Paul. MN 55101-1634 6/2 291-6359 FIX 6/2 291-6550 !IY 6/2 291-0904 November 16, 1992 Lindberg Ekola City of Shakopee 129 First Av. E. Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: St. Francis Regional Medical Center Environmental Assessment Worksheet Metropolitan Council District 14 Dear Mr. Ekola: Council staff has conducted a preliminary review of this environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) to determine its adequacy and accuracy in addressing regional concerns. The staff review has concluded that the EAW is complete and accurate with respect to regional concerns and raises no major issues of consistency with Council policies. An EIS is not necessary for regional purposes. Staff notes, however, that even though traffic congestion is not a major concern with the proposed medical center, the city should encourage the center to consider implementing travel demand managment measures to promote employee ridesharing and transit use. Travel demand management is being used successfully at many other employment locations in this region, including Abbott Northwestern Hospital. This will conclude the Council's review of the EAW. No formal action on the EAW will be taken by the Council. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Barbara Senness, Council staff at 291-6419. Sincerely, / /7" Lyall Schwarz .. , Director Research and Long Range Planning LS/bgs cc: Bonnie Featherstone, Metropolitan Council District 14 Lynda Voge, Metropolitan Council Staff Barbara Senness, Metropolitan Council Staff SCOTT COUNTY PLANNING, INSPECTIONS& ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH # COURTHOUSE A102 428 S. HOLMES ST. / SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1393 (612)496-8353 November 20, 1992 Mr. Lindberg Ekola, City Planner City of Shakopee 129 East First Ave. Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: EAW for the Proposed St. Francis Regional Medical Center Dear Lindberg: Thank you for sending this office a copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the St. Francis Regional Medical Center to be located south of the future Shakopee By-pass. In reviewing the EAW the following was noted: - Number 8 on page 3 should also include the Shakopee Basin Water Management Organization. - In reviewing the document, the proposed location allows for an institutional use on the City' s Land Use Plan. The city may want to consider stronger landscaping on the east and south sides of the project due to the contiguous agricultural cropland. In the future there may be adjacent lighter land uses, especially to the east. It my understanding in talking to you that the County Highway Department has also been sent a copy of the EAW. Therefore, if there are any comments on traffic or roads they will cover those issues. Sincerely, 61.)----e4aj4e, Jon Westlake Planning/Inspections/ Environmental Health Director JW/kb cc: Brad Larson, County Highway Engineer An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Scott Soil and Water 107 Water Street Conservation District Jordan, MN 55352 December 3 , 1992 Mr. Lindberg S. Ekola City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379-1376 _ Re: Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the Proposed St. Francis Regional Medical Center Dear Mr. Ekola: A review of the EAW for the St. Francis Regional Medical Center has been completed by the Scott Soil and Water Conservation Distict Permit Review Committee. The following comments and/or suggestions are submitted for your consideration. 1. Item #17 - An erosion control plan should be supplied to City of Shakopee, Scott Soil and Water Conservation District and the Shakopee Basin WMO prior to construction activities beginning. This plan should identify the erosion and sediment control practices to be used, the location of the practices, the time schedule for implementation and the maintenance of the practices. Sincerely, '� u.,)//fiLet.; C�(t'-t'T-e f%z-y aCh__v Wilmer Gruetzmacher Scott SWCD SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 600 COUNTRY TRAIL EAST JORDAN, MN 55352-9339 612) 496-8346 FAX(612) 496-8365 BRADLEY J.LARSON Highway Engineer DANIEL M.JOBE December 4 , 1992 Asst.Highway Engineer-Design DON D.PAULSON Asst.Highway Engineer-Construction Mr . Lindberg Ekola City Planner City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue LShakopee, MN 55379 Re : EAW for the Proposed St . Francis Regional L Medical Center CSAH 17 LDear Lindberg: The Scott County Highway Department has reviewed the above L referenced EAW relative to impacts to the County highway system and note that the statements in the EAW are consistent with preliminary discussions held between the County, City, and proposer . We look forward to working with the City and the proposer on this project. L s ' Icerely, r- LEradley J. 4jn, P . E . County High.:.c=-, -ngineer LBJL/kmg L L L L An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY December 4, 1992 Mr. Lindberg S. Ekola City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 Dear Mr. Ekola: Re: Proposed St. Francis Regional Medical Center; south of Shakopee Bypass & east of CR 17; SE/4 NE/4, NE/4 SE/4 & S/2 NE/4 NE/4 S18 T115 R22 Scott County MHS Referral File Number: 93-0397 Thank you for providing this office a copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the above-referenced project. It has been reviewed pursuant to responsibilities given to the Minnesota Historical Society by the Minnesota Historic Sites Act and the Minnesota Field Archaeology Act and through the process outlined in Minnesota Rules 4410.1600. There are no properties in the project area that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places or included in our inventory. In the absence of reported properties, we have also evaluated the likelihood that unreported historic or archaeological properties may be present. Although we cannot _ state with certainty that there are no significant unreported historical or archaeological properties within the project area, we feel that the probabil- ity of such properties being present is low. Therefore, in our opinion, the "no" response to question 26a is appropriate. Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Sec- tion 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36CFR800, Pro- - cedures of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation for the protection of histcric properties. if this project is considered for federal assistance, it should be submitted to our office with reference to the assisting federal agency. Please contact Dennis Gimmestad at 612-296-5462 if you have any questions regarding our review of this project. Sincerely, Britta L. Bloomberg Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer BLB:dmb cc: Office of the State Archaeologist, c/o Donn Coddington, MHS :315 KELLOGG BOULEVARD WEST/SAINT PAUL.MINNESOTA 55102-1906/TELEPHONE:612-296-6I26 j celebration . - Minnesota Pollution Control Agency > Celebrating our 25th anniversary and the 20th anniversary of the Clean Water Act 14111111110.. December 4, 1992 Mr. Lindberg S. Ekola City Planner 129 First Avenue East Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Mr. Ekola: RE: St. Francis Regional Medical Center Environmental Assessment Worksheet — Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the St. Francis Regional Medical Center Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) to be built in the city of Shakopee, Scott County. Based on the information contained in the EAW, the Environmental Analysis Office staff believes that significant environmental effects are not likely to occur as a result of the project. Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) does not appear warranted. We do, however, have the following concerns: 1. Regarding items 8 and 10 of the EAW, there appears to be an inconsistency. Item 8 mentions that a permit is required from the city of Shakopee because of the Wetlands Conservation Act. But item 10 lists no area as being classified as a wetland. If any wetland is impacted by this project, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff would like to evaluate information on the impacted wetlands. 2. Regarding item 8 of the EAW: — a. This question noted that the project proposer will need to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the city of Shakopee. I assume this is for storm water ponds. One NPDES permit would need to be obtained for the construction phase of the project; another would be needed for the operational phase. However, no cities in Minnesota can issue NPDES permits; only the MPCA can issue NPDES permits. Therefore, the MPCA is the permitting agency. If you have any questions regarding storm water permits, please contact Scott Thompson of the MPCA Water Quality Division at (612) 296-7203. b. The Wetlands Conservation Act Permit, if one is required, would be obtained from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) . After obtaining the permit from the COE, the project proposer should contact Larry Zdon of the MPCA Water Quality Division at (612) 297-8219 to obtain a certificate for this permit. 3. Regarding items 19b and 19c of the EAW, the project proposer should confirm — with the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission whether there are any other pretreatment requirements for discharging into the sanitary sewer system. 520 Lafayette Rd.; St. Paul,MN 55155-3898; (612)296-6300; Regional Offices: Duluth•Brainerd•Detroit Lakes•Marshall•Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer•Printed on Recycled Paper Mr. Lindberg S. Ekola Page 2 4. Regarding item 21b of the EAW, the 20,000-gallon oil storage tank would need to be pre-noticed with the MPCA Underground Storage Tank program and then registered after it is installed. Pre-notice and registration forms and a fact sheet on tank installation are enclosed. If you have any questions, please call the MPCA Underground Storage Tank helpline at (612) 297-8679. Minnesota Rules pt. 4410.1700, subp. 5, require that you send us a copy of your specific responses to our comments. We look forward to receiving your decision on the need for an EIS. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please contact Christy Peterson of my staff at (612) 297-8236. Sincerely, Paul Hoff, Director Environmental Analysis Office Administrative Services Division PH:ns Enclosures • • ADVANCE NOTICE for UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK INSTALLATION or CLOSURE r Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) �9J Hazardous Waste Division Tanks and Spills Section ' 520 La;ayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 Telephone (612) 297-8:57 or 1 (800) 657-3864 Fax (612) 297-8676 At}vrre no:icc for tr.rxi:p-3:.^L s:_.-.ige Iznk irs-tlia..6on and ci r.--e is roeuired by Minn. Sw._eh 116 and M:^ Rule ch 7150. For MPCA office use: Phoned in or completed by: Site s: Tate: hrall s: Phone: Remove t: Date: SITE INFORMATION OWNER INFORMATION Owner Name: She Name: Address: Address: y: Cfty: Cl County: Zip000e: State: Z poode: Phone: Phone: Contact Person: Contact Person: Has tank site previously been registered with the MPCA? Dyes 0 n ❑unknown r tf yes, MPCA site #: TANK INFORMATION Please artac-h additional pages is repo-Ling more than five tanks. Please chock applicable box. Tank# Tank* Tank# Tank# Tank# D instal,tank& pipe 0 install tank& pipe ❑ instal!tank & piae 0 install tank& pipe 0 instank& pipe 0 install tank 0 install tank 0 install tank 0 install tank install tankE install pipe 0 install pipe 0 install pipe 0 install pipe 0 install pipe0 remove tank & 0 remove tank & pipe Z remove tank& pipe 0 remove tank& pipe remove tank& pipepipe rn remove tank n remove tank 0 remove tank ❑ remove tank 0 remove tank ❑ remove pipe 0 remove pipe 0 remove pipe 0 remove pipe 0 remove pipe 0 close tank in place D close tank in place 0 close tank in pias 0 close tank in place 0 close tank in plate Tank type: Tank type: Tank type: Tank type: Tank type: Capacity: Product: Capa.r-y: ��""•y Capacity: Product: Product: Product: Product: — Product: P Pro type: PQe type: Pipe lope: POO type: type: is tank registered? is tank registered? is tank reg stared'' is tank registered? is tank registered? INSTALLATION CLOSURE Closure DEde: installx,lon Date: Contractor#1 Name: Contractor 11 Name: Certification Number: Certiiica ion Number. Contractor C2 Name: Contractor#2 Name: ________----- Ca Certification Number: COrttica:ion Number: Tank Disposal Company's Name: COMMENTS (attach additional sheets if necessary) • MPCA krillials informational pa7cet sent to: G site 0 owner O other (ncl:,de address in 'Cornrnents'bbck) PQ-006:8 ploy 19472)'Prior notification period begins with MPCA date of receipt. Planning Ahead for Underground Storage Tank Installation Many petroleum tank owners are -� 'osing to install new underground storage tank systems (USTs) as an alternative to upgrading their old system to meet state regulations. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) suggests that you plan ahead for your UST investment. The suggestions below should help assure a quality UST system is instdlled which fulfills state and federal UST requirements. Plan ahead... Notify the MPCA at least 30 days before Installing an UST system. This notification is required by Minn. Rules pt. 7150.0120 and applies to both tank and piping installations. The information requested is: • site name • contractor name • site location • contractor certification number • site phone number • basic tank information • installation date If the contractor is not known at the time of initial notification, the MPCA asks you furnish this information as soon as possible. Notification can be given by phone, FAX or mail.' Plan ahead... Obtain State Fire Marshal approval of installation plans. Ten working days should be allowed for the State Fire Marshal Office to review the installation plans. Also, remember to notify other appropriate local officials since additional permits may be necessary. Plan ahead... Hire a qualified state certified contractor. Contractors who install regulated UST systems must be certified by the MPCA. This certification means they employ a certified supervisor who must be on site during the critical procedures of the tank installation. This supervisor must have at least two years of tank-related work experience, completed a state approved UST course and have actively participated in a minimum of five tank project within the previous two years. Additionally, the contracting company must have some form of insurance coverage. The MPCA can provide you with a list of certified contractors. We recommend that you contact several contracting companies and obtain references; this is a big investment and you want to be sure you are receiving quality work. Plan ahead... Familiarize yourself with UST installation practices. A 'smart shopper' studies the investment before buying. The MPCA has numerous publications regarding UST installations. These will familiarize you with the basics of the installation process. Plan ahead...Call confirmation notice to the MPCA if project is delayed two calender days beyond original notice. The confirmation notice is intended to update the MPCA on the actual date of the UST installation if the project is delayed for more than two days beyond original notice. For instance, if initial notification projected June 1 to be the installation date, a confirmation notice would be necessary if work began on June 3. Plan ahead... Within 30 days after tank has been installed, mall a Minnesota Notification for Underground Storage Tanks form to the MPCA. This form is used to register UST systems as required by Minnesota Statutes ch. 116.48. For specific information about underground storage tanks, contact the MPGA 'Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ,' HRzardous Waste Division Tanks and Spills Section 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, NLN 55155 phone (612) 297-8679 or 1-800-657-3864 FAX (612) 297-8676 P000629 (7.'92) for office use: Notification/Change in Status for Underground Storage Tanks ,f'�,� Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Leak:: [�,[ Hazardous Waste Division Tanks and Spills Section 4 i'T 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 Owner S. (612)297-8664 or 1-800-657-3864 Date received: A. Facillty Information 1. Tank Site Location 2. Owner Location Name Name Street Street City County City County State Zp Phone( ) State Zp Phone ( ) Contact Person Contact Penson 3. Type of Facility Please�recic applicable box. Service station 0 Government 0 Education 0 Industry/factory 0 Church 0 Auto deaier 0 Lriiity 0 Other (spec`y): 4. Is tank facility located on Tribal Lands? 0 yes 0 no B. Tank Number Type or use black ink and complete as D. Tank Information continued well as possible. Please photocopy form If site has more than TANK 1 TANK2 TANK 3 three tanks. 2. Secondary Containment: Double wall 0 0 ❑ 1.Assign a 3 digit number to each tank (,a. x1, (x2...) Vault 0 0 0 TANK 1 TANK 2 TANK 3 1 Internal bladder 0 0 0 , External liner 0 0 ❑ 2.Tank installation date: , 3. Cathodic Protection: or ro:-..a.r ma:br Anodes 0 0 0 C. Tank Action Please check applicable boxes. Impressed current 0 0 0 TAMC 1 TANK2 TANK3 Qat*Occurred Lined tank 0 0 • 0 Initial notification of site — _ ❑ Not needed (ie.fiberglass) 0 0 0 Changed site name/address ❑ ❑ 0 _/ / d certified by=erosion expert. wine name and PE or certification#in Box H. (please give previocu name/add-ass in Box H) 4. Does tank have spill prevention equipment? Changed tank owner 0 0 ❑ _// ❑ ❑ 0 0 O ❑ (please give previous owner's name and add-ess in Box H) yes no yes no yes no Changed tank contents 0 0 0 //.— Installed new tanks & piping 0 0 0 5. Overfill Prevention Equipment Installed new tank(s) at site 0 0 0 Ball float valve 0 0 0 Installed new piping 0 0 0 _// Automatic shut-off 0 0 0 Repaired/upgraded tank 0 0 ❑ _// Audible alarm 0 0 ❑ (crnrtite 03, 04, 05 and Box G if pertains and explain actions in Box H) Repaired/upgraded piping 0 0 0 _// 6. Is the tank compartmental? 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 (please complete Box F and explain actions in Box H) yes no yes no yes no Removed tank ❑ 0 ❑ // if answered "yes"to*`6,phase proceed to Box E Name of tank dspos.al company: 1 Hazardous waste generator ID 5: 7. Capacity(in gallons): J Closed tank in place O 0 0 _—.// Abandoned O 0 0 / / 8. Substance currently or last stored: Is tank empty? 0 yes 0 no Gasoline 0 0 0 Temporarily ckosed 0 0 0 / / Alcohol blend (over 5%)gasoline 0 0 0 Is tank empty? 0 yes 0 no Diesel 0 0 0 Used (waste) oil ❑ 0 0 D. Tank Information Please check applicable boxes. 'Fuel oil 0 0 0 1.Type of Tank: TANK 1 TANK2 TANK3 Kerosene 0 0 0 Hazaidous substance 0 0 0 STIP3 0 0 = (specify chemical and tank 0 in Box H) Fiberglass 0 0 0 Other (spedfy in Box H) 0 ❑ 0 Composite O 0 0 Jacketed steel 0 0 0 9. Is product stored in tank used only for heating? Asphalt=ated steal O 0 0 ❑ O O O 0 ❑ Painted steel 0 O 0 yes no yes no yes no Bare sweet 0 0 0 Other (specify in Box H) 0 0 0 ( turn page over! 1 P0-004 10-G3 112.'92) E. FOR COMPARTMENTAL TANKS ONLY Li. release uetectlon riease c.,ecx a:l apptt.pw voxes. 1 Tanks: TANK I TANK 2 TANK 3 TANK 1 TANK 2 TANK 3 Inventory control (daily sticking) 0 0 0 1. Compartment Cap r ty Tank precision test 0 0 0 compartment 1 [ 1 Manual tank gauging 0 0 0 Automatic tank gauging O 0 0 t7ompartmersi 2 I _.Soil vapor monitoring ❑ 0 ❑ compartment 3 I 1 Groundwater mortaring 0 0 0 Interstitial monitoring 0 0 0 • 2 Compartment Product: Tracer monitoring C 0 0 None 0 0 0 Compartment 1 Other(specify in Box H) 0 0 0 1 compartment 2 1 1a. For newty Installed tanks only compartment 3 [ 1 • Was a tank precision test conducted prior to placing the system into operation? 0 yes ❑ no 3. Is product stored in tank used only for heating? K yes,date test was conducted: _/_/ Compartment 1 ❑es ❑no Y no yes no 2. Piping: compartment 2 0 0 yes no yes 0 yes 0 Automatic line leak detector 0 0 0 Line precision test annually 0 0 0 compartment 3 yes �o yes 0 yes no Vapor monitoring 0 0 0 Groundwater monitoring 0 0 0 Interstitial monitoring 0 0 0 Line precision test every three years 0 0 0 F. Piping Please check all applicable boxes None 0 0 0 1. Construction Material: TANK 1 TANK 2 TANK 3 Other(specify in Box H) 0 ❑ 0 Epoxy coated steel 0 0 0 2a. For newly Installed piping onty Galvanized steel 0 0 0 Was a line precision test conducted prior to placing the Wrapped 0 0 0 system into operation? 0 yes 0 no Bare steeVElacc iron ❑ 0 0 yes, date test was conducted: _I—I— Fiberglass o o o Copper 0 0 0 Other (sped in Box H) 0 0 0 H. Comments (attach additional sheets if necessary) 2. Secondary Containment Double wall 0 0 0 • Exterior liner 0 0 0 3. Cathodic Protection: Anodes 0 0 0 Impressed current 0 0 ❑ Questions?Not needed (ie. fiberglass) 0 0 0 Call If certified by rxrosion expert, write name and PE or certification s in Box H (612)297-8664 4.Type of Pump: Suction ❑ 0 0 oa chaok valve boated at: 0 tank 0 dispenser 1.300-657-3864 Submersible 0 0 0 during normal Gravity 0 0 0 `business hours) Other (specify in Box H) 0 0 0 I. Owner's Signature J. Tank Contractor's Signature 1 certify under penalty of law that the information stroked is accurate I certify under penalty of Law that all work was performed cu specified and complete to the bests of my knowledge. For tank work performed by the marutfacturers'insructi.crs,and according to industry after July 9,1990,1 certify that the tank contractor was in compliance standards,applicable.date and federal regulations and its complete to with the certcation requirements of Minn.Rules ch.7105. All work the best of my knowledge. I certyfy that I am in compliance with Minn_ completed after Dec.1988 was performed in accordance with Rules ch.7105,for work completed after July 9,1990. manufacturers'instructions,indt=gry standards,and applicable state . and federal regulations. MPGA Contractor i Print name of tank contactor Print name of owner or autnorized represenmtve The Print name of contra-tor's authorized representative Title Signaaire of owner or authorized re—presentative Date – ire of toric con actors rnpresen�Cve Date Unsigned forms will be returned Print name of supervisor on site d.nrc mink work MPCA Supervisors Please retain$cow for your own records Signet-ire of supervisor Date lise of this form ii required by Mira.S aL-ICC- 116.48 sad Mina Rule ch.7150. PO-00410-03(t 2'92) STATE OF MIMES octrza DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 500 LAFAYETTE ROAD • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55155-40 10 ONR INFORMATION (612) 296-6157 December 7, 1992 Lindberg S. Ekola, City Planner City of Shakopee 129 First Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: St. Francis Regional Medical Center Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Dear Mr. Lindberg: The Department of Natural Resources has reviewed the EAW for the St. Francis Regional Medical Center project. We offer the following comments for your consideration. We note in Item 18b that the EAW contains a stormwater treatment plan for this facility. The DNR appreciates its inclusion for this project. We also note that this project appears to require application for a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) storm water discharge permit because this project will disturb five or more acres of land as it is implemented. This application should be noted in Item 8 of the EAW. The storage tanks noted in Item 21 require MPCA registration, and this requirement should be listed in Item 8 of the EAW. Thank you for the opportunity to review this document. From a natural resour es perspective, it appears that this project does not merit the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). We look forward to receiving your record of decision and responses to our comments. Minnesota Rules part 4410.1700, subparts 4 & 5, requires you to send us your Record of Decision within five days of deciding this action. Please contact Joe Stinchfield of my staff, at (612) 297- 4313, if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Thomas W. Balcom, Supervisor Natural Resources Planning and Review Section Office of Planning c: Dave Leuthe — Steve Colvin Tom Lutgen Lynn M. Lewis, USFWS Gregg Downing, EQB Brian Weinreis, St. Francis Hospital #930091-01/ERS.STFRAN.DOC AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Q �� DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Vie- F• ST.PAUL DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS w' •: 4 c.f. 180 E.KELLOGG BLVD.,ROOM 1421 ST PAUL,MINNESOTA 55101-1479 T '/ ‘*/ December 8, 1992 �s4 r,so REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Construction-Operations Regulatory (93-00872-NP-GAE) Mr. Brian Weinreis St. Francis Hospital 325 Fifth Avenue West Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Mr. Weinreis: We have reviewed the information provided us about the project proposed by St. Francis Hospital to construct a new St. Francis Regional Medical Center on a 60-acre upland area located east of County Road 17 (Marschall Road) at a site in the NE 1/4 Section 18, T. 115 N., R. 22 W. , of Scott County, Minnesota. The work proposed at the location stated is not within the regulatory jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers. No work will be done in a navigable water of the United States, and no dredged or fill material will be placed in any water of the United States, including wetlands. Therefore, a Department of the Army permit is not required to do this work. This letter is valid only for the project referenced above. If any change in design, location, or purpose is contemplated, contact this office to avoid doing work that may be in violation of Federal law. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS CONFIRMATION LETTER DOES NOT ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR STATE, LOCAL, OR OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS, SUCH AS THOSE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES OR COUNTY. If you have any questions, please call Gary Elftmann of this office at (612) 220-0355. Sincerely, i. Ben Wopa (/,i7 Chief, Regulatory Branch Construction-Operations Division Copy furnished: Mr. Lindberg Ekola City Planner City of Shakopee 129 First Avenue East r Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Part 3 RESPONSES TO THE COMMENTS MADE ON THE - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET — FOR THE ST. FRANCIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Responsible Governmental Unit: — City of Shakopee 129 First Avenue East Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 — (612) 445-3650 December 15, 1992 EAW COMMENTS RECEIVED PROPOSED ST. FRANCIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER DATE AGENCY 11-16-92 1. Metropolitan Council 11-20-92 2. Scott County Planning Department 12-03-92 3. Scott County Soil and Water Conservation District 12-04-92 4. Scott County Highway Department 12-04-92 5. Minnesota Historical Society 12-04-92 6. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 12-04-92 7. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 12-08-92 8. United Stated Army Corps of Engineers 1. Metropolitan Council Comment: The City should encourage the implementation of travel demand management strategies to promote employee ride sharing and transit use. Response: The City will encourage the implementation of travel demand management strategies through the development review process (rezoning, subdivision platting, etc.) 2. Scott County Planning Department Comment: The City should consider stronger landscaping requirements to mitigate impacts on adjacent future land uses. The Shakopee Basin Water Management Organization (WMO) should be included with Question 8 on Page 3. Response: Through the development review process, the City will require the appropriate landscaping requirements for the medical center. The Shakopee WMO will be included in the development review process. Stormwater Management Plans will be forwarded to the WMO for their review. 3. Scott County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) Comment: An Erosion Control Plan should be provided to the City of Shakopee, Scott County SWCD, and the Shakopee Basin WMO prior to the beginning of construction activities. Response: An Erosion Control Plan and other stormwater management documents will be forwarded to the Scott County SWCD and the Shakopee Basin WMO for their review in the development review process. 4. Scott County Highway Department _ Comment: The EAW is consistent with preliminary discussions between the County,the City of Shakopee and St. Francis. Response: Additional project design information will be forwardedto the Scott County Highway Department in the development review process. 5. Minnesota Historical Society Comment: If federal assistance is required for this project,the requirements from Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36CFR800 need to be addressed. Response: _ St. Francis is exploring alternative financing options. If federal funding is utilized, St. Francis will address the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act and 36CFR800 as required. 6. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Comment: Status of wetlands on the site, wetland permits required,pretreatment requirements for discharging into the sanitary sewer system, registration of the 20,000 gallon oil storage tank with MPCA. Response: The City of Shakopee serves as the Local Governing Unit (LGU) for the Wetlands Conservation Act. A final determination on wetlands will be made in the development review process. Based on a preliminary review of the site and discussions with the appropriate agencies, there do not appear to be any wetlands on the site. A Certificate of Exemption will likely be approved by the City for this project. The appropriate NPDES permits will need to be issued by the MPCA. City staff will direct St. Francis to the MPCA for these permit approvals. In the development review process, City staff will direct St. Francis to the U.S.Army Corp. of Engineers (COE) and Larry Zdon of the MPCA. City staff will direct St.Francis to contact the MWCC for pretreatment requirements of the sanitary sewer discharges. Any pretreatment requirements by the MWCC will be incorporated into the project approval by the City. A copy of the MPCA applications for storage tanks enclosed with the MPCA letter has been forwarded to St. Francis. Prior to the project's approval by the City,the appropriate MPCA approvals will be required. 7. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) Comment: A Stormwater Discharge Permit will need to be processed through the MPCA. The proposed storage tank will need to be registered with the MPCA. Response: The appropriate MPCA approvals will be required in the development review process. 8. United States Army Corp. of Engineers (COE) Comment: No COE permits will be required for the proposed medical center. Response: No further action with COE is needed. COSEi\IT MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Official Newspaper DATE: December 23, 1992 INTRODUCTION: One of the actions which needs to be taken at the first Council meeting of the year is the designation of the official newspaper for the City of Shakopee. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to designate the Shakopee Valley News as the official newspaper for the city of Shakopee for the year 1993 . JSC/tiv 111r CONSENT There are not anticipated "budget versus actual expenditure" problems within division totals apparent at this point (11/30/92) . Many division are running close to the budget. Included in the bill list is a payment for $10 , 000 to GAB. This is for the $5, 000 deductable on the errors and omissions insurance coverage relating to the Teamsters (Police) suit and the Karkanen suit. n n x o A A A A A A A A A A A W A 41 A (.4 A W DI * r * r * r * r * r * %o * V) * '.0 * %0 n ✓ 0, V CO V CO V 00 V 03 V ON V ON V OI V O+ 7C n r r r r I— JZ U1 A W N r W N r 0 0 r A r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r n x 10 1/40 1/40 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 '.0 10 10 10 10 10 10 '.0 '.0 10 10 10 x VI 10 10 10 1/40 '.0 '.0 10 '.0 '.0 ko 'o '.0 '0 v0 %o 11) v0 V0 V0 '0 '.0 '.0 v0 LT1 n N Ni N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N n 74 r r r r r r r r r r r r I- r r r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 CI — 5 -- b Ci3 r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N r r H H O' O'. ON OT 01 OT ON N N N N N N N N N N N Al N r r t'l H C5 C3 P3 x irk VI 03 I-• r to +n r r XH CI N N O31:7% Vf 1/1 N U1 UI 03 CO A W r rW t''1 x N L) V) V) V) 0 U1 U1 W W 41 CO U1 L) L) N VI. L) U1 U1 U1 V) N N if) N N 1A W 10 '.0 CO r J T ON 10 10 CO J r N N W V) r r 0 0 N r r r A N UI r 41 V) V) 0 A A 03 r J 0 ON OI 10 10 10 A A A A r N r J 0 0 J J O N CO CO 10 0 CO N 10 '0 J J 0 0 0Cy 0 0 0 0 0 W J J J 0 U1 O U1 0 0 U1 U1 W 0 Vo OI N J L71 41 W J 0 0 0 0 0 H n O 0 0 0 10 N J J J 0 0 0 0 0 0 as us so A N v1 A 0 J r J ON 0 0 0 0 0 W * * * * * * * * * r C O O O AA20 21 7 p ZZZ X Z 3: 3 ZZXZ H �+ to to r H H H H H H H H H r 03 n n 0 ZZZ ZZXZZZH II I ZX XZX HH sip 0 T+ T1 T/ x Cz1 CI C9 [=7 C9 C9 Cif Lri L=7 L+7 C21 H H N CH/) 3 0 0 0 x x x 03 00000000000 n • iGC3 H •,7 •� x x Tf HHHHHHHHHHH 0 O A0 �, �, x x t>ytOtaasCowoPoaontaas ma CO C C C r r r O ai t[n ai vii vii ai v[i ton v[i ai ton 0 z w y t21 CV Z ZZZ M rororororororororororo H 7Cx 0 A x7 :h z X 7d X, x7 7d x 7a ',t'1 H H H 0 ro CICi 03 03 00000000000 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t7 0 0 0 x Tl T1 H H N to 01 01 01 to to to to U1 to CI CI CI Z H H Z Z H H 03 to Cil 0 0 roLtd H 0 ti r C b [ H H H H H x H tl 0 ro ro ro ro H 0 VI VI KK K ° x z C H 0 Q d 03 H n CI Z 03 03 C9 [X 0TJ 0T1 to 74 MI n to 7a = H O H mi O H H C to H C9 O i x Cil H to 1/40 0 10 1/40 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Om as as W W 03 03 CO CO W W W A r A 41 r 10 r r r r W N U1 u1 21 r N r r r W co.: W r Nr Nr r W Wr r Or J VI" r r r CO CO n 10 r 0 0 0 O r al r r r N J 1.71 n 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 0 0 A A N N N N W W 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A 0 0 UI 03 qHx UI r r r 0 A N W N N N N N N N N N N N N r r tA W U1 J J J 03 0 A 10 O 0 N N N 0 as 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O A r r r so so so 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 41 (9 W J J J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 I- Q' UA J J J 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0: s0 %0 s0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0 10 0 10 10 10 1/40 10 10 10 10 10 10 '.0 W J J H n 03 Z 0 Iro 03 o CV x 1 b T H H H H H H H H H HHHHHHHHHHH H H H 'Ci ro V v ro ro ro 'Cl X PO XIXI 7d 7P 70 70 M M M XI 7d X, 70 m r Cl Cl A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A x 5O HDi * * H * r * r * I-+ * r * H * r * I-+ * I-. C) Z. V Co V co V Co V Co V OD V Co V co V CO V Co V Co X (1 N N N N N N H H H U1 A W N r 0 %O co J CH Z r O I-' I-• r f-+ r •-• r H r r r r I-. H r r r r H r r 0 x 10 .0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 30 30 %O 30 ',d1 C9 30 '.) to %.o to so 43 .0 10 10 1/40 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 '.0 C9 C7 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 71 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\,, \ \ \\\,,\ \,, 77 r r r r r r H I-. r r r r r I-' r r Ir F+ r r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 5 ,, s ,, 5 ., y p I- H r - F+ - f+ 1•+ I-' H H F+ - - r r I-. r - - l•+ H H O1 m m O'. a CT 03 CT CT 01 01 CT O1 O' 01 m 0'1 CT 0% 0% 0% C11 Cn H [11 A SU x in in 01 in .03 N r N r 0 <A <A <A III r r in r <A <A Cl) O1 <A <A <A UI 'Cl) 0 77 H U1 Ui r r N O N CO CO CO H O fr N N O N O ]". 'Cl) <A <A Lf <A <A 'Cl) N 0 O 0 A A r r 1/40 A U1 J J UI 1.11 <A N CO A J CO J N A 0 J N A O J CO CO 0 J J U1 UI W W W 0 N CA CO 0 0 U1 1.71 H 10 A N A A U1 CO UI N 0% J h+ J W 30 0 A A O O O O r w co w w O O co co O r Ut CO A A co m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 10 10 O O O O J A W J J O O %0 10 UI O+ A CO J CO O% N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n * * * * * * * * * * W r m C ro II, ro Z xTY g Z Z x x Z Z Z r n •y CA C9 CA 01 E �H p 173 b t0 1X1 b C Cl C G C7 C G .0 1/413 n ro H% t7 70 73 01 C11 C C C C C C CA C9 CA y V1 CA CA N C 0 Ch b b y In 01 Ch D1 CJ CI DI C) A A 0 A (] 0 • H H H H H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 H I to > 01 C17 01 CA 01 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co xx r r r r r r r C •H H H GO CO CD CO CO to Q Z 7 ' C C C C C C C H M H H H H M xdw H H DI 0 ?0 V1 C9 77 77 77 77 77 77 Cn 03 c Cn Cn to CQ 0 U1 U1 U1 CA CO CA H H H H H H H ;U 0 M 1y > Y 41 Y > J J J J J J J Ey 71 71 71 77 74 74 N N N N N N N 'p3n3IT1ro b ro 0000000 01 C N ro VI J J J '11 X 41 41 '11 '11 '+7 '11 C1 C C C7 C C7 C W 0 UI UI U1 U1 H H M H H H H M CI CI C17 CI 01 08 C9 co0H0H H ro ro ro ro ro ro roO y 03 U) CO A Cl)n ' > A A OO 01 X •••3 .12 X 'd CCA CA CA CCACo I I 0 CCK H H H H H H HC9 I-+ O O 0 C1 K C11 03 fC HHHHHHHo Q O03 Crn t!f to CA to Vto 1-4 ell 7 Z HCO ECI ( tint" Cr rororororororo U Z 0 > tivr7 bDI T* bv > T• ays1 C1 H b 04 73 01 03 0XI b b Y 70 SI Y Ii ' n3 ,c1 CO CO Co CO 03 to CO n3 V1 01 70 04 ►S K DI C9 C9 01 C11 CO 09 M 0 70 SY 7:4 CO CO CO Z 01 DI .0 0 1D10 1/4010 10 1/40 10 10 10 10 14 30 W LJ W W w W 30 CO w CD CO CO CO w 0 CO CO CO 03 Cb CO 30 30 10 10 30 30 Oo Z I-• r r rO G 0r 0 r r r r r r r r r r H r r m 0 N I N I N I I I 10 0 I I O J O+ W N r W O I IA I I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O 0 J N .rd r r r A N N N N N N N N N N N N N PDI O r r r r r r N N N N N N N t1 CO 0 0\ CO CO CO 0 NO N J J C J J J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W r w r w r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I-, 0 0 I•• r I-+ 30 0 r r r r r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cu 0 0 0 0 w w w 0 0 (9 (9 ( w w O O O O O O O H 03 0 0 OM UI A w 00 ON O% L71 U1 A A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x UI LA0 0 0 0 0 0 0Co tA U1 U1 (11 VI 1.71 1J1 U1 G L., N I'' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OH 0 C8 Z 0 Iro oa o 01 XI b '[1 'HU 'HU 'H9 'HH V H H H H R H H H H H H H H H 01 'CI ro ro '1:1 '10 '13 '32 '1:1 ,13 ro 'urororororo 1 N n n x O A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CA * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r n V 0o v co v co v co v co v co v co v Go v co v co v o7 V Oo V Oo P) n A A W W W W W W W W W W N H H 0 I.0 CO v 01 Ut A W N r 0 0' 0 ti n r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r n x %0 v.) 10 %0 v0 Vo 10 10 10 '0 '.0 '.o '.0 '.o '.0 x t9 Vo '.0 %o '0 10 '.0 Vo 10 10 %o %o '.o %o '.o '.0 t9 n W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N n 7q -S\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 5 \ \ . 7q O 0 0 O O O O 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 r x r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N 0 t1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 t-• H H 0 0 0 U1 0 0 UI to UI U1 UI UI U1 UI a t9 H t9 n :o x cii n 7q H x N t/f to N N 0 N 4f 4f 4f N N N 4f 0 N N 4.4 b r 4f 4,11 .0 N r r A N N r r W W r r 10 10 W W 'Cl) in in N N N Z ` O J N CO W N N 0 0 0 01 01 Vo '.0 4f Lf 0 0 UI 0 UI U1 01 C+ ON O1 0 UI 0 0 J J O+ ah '0 %0 0 0 0 r r W W k0 40 W W N N UI 0 W W UI 0 a' CT C tii 0A co a'. .0. A a, ar r N '. ' 0 O O to a . r r 0 0 .I 0 U1 10 10 0 0 0 0 xH n Io 01 41 0 0 CO CO 0 0 0 0 0 r r 0 0 0 0 r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * * * * * * * * * * * * w y r tn9 W nY �b�op > nY rx CA [co co x9 C ! q y I- t' t" C t" troll Cil H y Z (fl 7�0 H r' HZ v3 to U) CA 0 H Mtti x x y 0 x 0 N n x °x c H A a CI P' P' 0 H �' `� 0 0 Cr 0 CA 0 o b CO O O H 7qZ yyC y H �;r CA CCA Cl) n CCA CCA x MCI CI 0 t" In n x x W H 0 0 00 H 70 ►n4 K 0 t9 t'l r 0 T.' 70 X In t! x n 0 m H to H H H 0 Z In N H to ro Oro VI 10 n 0 0 0 CI N • W MI VII O'8 H C [ y CA '09 �� H 0 [II A x x Cl)0 0 VI til H H Cl) x AH VI 0 CCA C• x9 0 H CCI CCA H Co H 0 H W Q Cx] Y C09 x z CA 0 D' CA 0 n Vi 'V PO PO AM H In ro ?! ro x MI In 4 ro tl t H 00 H C+] H tI to Cl 0 H Z COri H Cl) Cl Cl) H H �� H n to C9 is N ?� 1-3 H H Z 0 H Z x a` %o 0 0 vo O 41 w 0 AA O O 0 0 0r A N 0o 4f 1.4 CO 1 H,, N O' A UI W a' N a` A r A r r r n I-• r r r r r r -7 r r N 0 r N 0 n I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I CO O A A A A A A A A A A A N A A N Cl ITC3,� W W W N W W A N W N 0 N N W /-• PO N N r A 0% 01 W r r r UI r r '.0 r r 0 0 O 0 IA U1 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl O '.0 0% 0 '.o r 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N N 0 rn 0La H O 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 I N 0 0 CO Z W W W W W W A W 0 N W -J W 0 A A A A A A W A A 'o A UI 1.11 A W N N -7 r 0 0 '.0 H 0 CO n N Cl Z 0 i ro m 0 Cl b O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 H x x x = x x x x x RI x x x x NI (4 n n AA A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A t=1 * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r n 2 v co v o v w v o v Co v Co v CO v CO v CO v CO v CO 741 n tin UI UI A A A A A A A A r N r 0 10 03 o 01 LA A W N Z t" O n r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r n x 10 10 10 1/40 10 10 11:1 10 10 la 10 10 LO 1/40 10 1/40 .1:a '.0 '.3; tii to '.o '.0 '.0 %o '.0 '.o '.0 io '.0 '.0 '.0 '.0 '.0 'o '.0 '.o '.0 t=1 n W w W w W W W W W W W W W W W W W W n M z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0 C9 s, -S— ,, . ,, ,,,, ,, S b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H N UI lT UI UI Uf to to In N VI ut to lT Ui UI UI U1 U1 Cil UI H t'1 n z M CA to <n N <n <# <A <n 7n4 H N r VI N r W N 0 <A N <n in 41 <A <n - . <n CA <A <n • <n • 0 <A <A r in r <A <n <A Vf 0 N to N A W 4f ch Co Co %0 A A W W N 41 00 W W W N r 03 CO r r 0 -7 0 N UI co -7 07 N co 0o A A r r W N A <A 4f 0 ON ON `0 I-' CO 00 03 lfl UI 0 0 ON A to to 0 0 0 0 0 r r 00 CO UI UI '.0 10 '0 0 ..I J U1 0 UI W W r r 0 0 0 0 ..1N UI 0 0 0 0 Co 0o OI ON OT J CO A A t9 0 0 %0 0 .0 Co co tr In 0 0 0 0 of 0 o% 0 0 0 0 A A 0 0 o% 0 co W W n * * * * * * * * * * * co r `i1 C9 CA til 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t7 n n n ` 0 7V 7C 0 M 0 0 0 t=1 Ci] C9 C9 tii > > t+ tilX1 �0 �0 0 VI PO MI •A x CA EA EA cnz Z N N N N cH ?/ Cl) 7 Y Cil !/1 t!7 C9 t9 C+1 C=1 UI UI UI CI 0 C9 C8 \ N H St C9 ►C K K K K N N N Cl) K It, t+ K • C" t" ° Z a+ a+ a+ 0 0 Z Z Z < 0 CA CA ?' ` 0 0 0 vI t" 4 x g H r in Cm CI z H m U107 < b W CA n yyH yNy yNy n n to y y tit H 'b 'q CO Z W tI 31 M VI 0 z z xll CM 0 0 0 Z H H 0 0 W H p C9 G1 '0"1 K K K C0]Ce] n 0 0'40C y V I n n Cif Cil CSI Z CA CZS MI U1 N Cn VI Pi ZH H H H H n 0 0 CV 0 o V 0 C9 b 'V 'v til Cil 'V 'V ro X n til 0C9 PO 'A x 'A 10 x z z IO b 31 31 Ai C!1 lora p CI t! o C! c 000 CC 000 xi 0 cCI C PI PI PI H H DI CA CA 0 ill H H En H X y y CA t 0 X N 3 N M rn r Z M N M C�11 CC!1 Cyn CA rV1 t9 Z z N 0 00 0 H 000 HH 000000 o 31 Hz e z zy y zy z z z y zy Cl) 0 H p y C :0 t� t" r bz t" t" t" CA C�1 Xy C X n cn Uf t'V 'V 01 b H CA z H PCS xxH 'Oa z� H ' t' ttm t' H tyii C�9 ttii H H CC!) CA ty'i t< H t" H H H N P:1 M C!) Pii P:1 Mtil C9 M PI ,R1 b C=1 M C=1 M DI tli < CI Z < < < Z c < c CO zth Z 0 CO UI H Cl) =i H H H n n n CA U) Z CT, 0 � CA CA 0 0 to CA t! n n U1 CA VI VI UI C9 t!) UI VI UI Ci] t9 O O O O O T O'. as O 0 43 0 0 0 '.0 0 0 0 A r r r A UI tr tr W W A r r 01 CO W W A I =y r -1 J N A 10 10 03 N H N r 10 A A N N N n r r r r r N r '.0 r r 0 r r r 0 r r cr. n I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o O A A A A A A A A A A A A A A N A A A Cm R N N W N N W W W N N W W W N N N N N P1 I-. r H r A r r r A A r r r UI r A r A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 In N W W W N N 0 0 0 0 '.0 O'. 0% p,,. A 0 0 A co 0 0 0 r r 0 0 0 0 rn co w I-. N 03 0 0 0 Al N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 co a A -.ICO C4 Ca A A A 0 0 Cl) UI UI N 01 A A A A r W In O� A A A A W 0 .D CO CO 0 CT ON Ol CA 0 V J V as N I 0 O 1.-. n N C9 z 0 CO CA z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ro w o xx x x 33 3: 31 31 331 MIxx x x xx x CD A A A x o A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A t9 I-• * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r A 03 V 03 V 0 V W V 03 V 03 V 03 V 03 V 03 V CO V Co V 03 V 03 V 03 3.3 A C% 0% 0% a% 01 01 T UI UI UI UI UI UI UI H C% UI A w N r 0 10 03 J C% UI A w 0Z t4 A HHHHHHHr HHHHHHA x 10 Io 1D Io 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 x tzf 10 10 10 10 Io 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 C9 A w w w w w w w w w w w w w w A 79 � � _ 7Q O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:1 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0 t9 y 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H UI UI UI UI UI UI UI UI UI UI UI UI UI UI DI H UI A 711 x C9 i4 in in -0 A Lf N A A to N r r 7C H H. f.. N N r r 0 0 x tJf N N 4f 'Cl) N N tp 'Cl) to 41 <II irk 'Cl) V) <If 'Cl) 0 0 -0 'Cl) r r w w w w r r A A N N r r r r W (.W 0 0 A r r 0% 01 r r N N .1 -7 N N A A N N w w 0 0 (9 (.4 v J 0 0 0 10 UI UI W W (9 (.W 01 0% UI UI J .7 N N 10 10 /D 10 A A 01 0' 0 0 0 0 x C9 UI w w N N 01 0% J -4 0 0 0 0 to Ut U1 vl w w a -4 0 0 OD 03 0 0 H A r O O O 0 •1 -4 03 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 w (9 10 %0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * * * * * * * * * * * * w F. �y �y 7C 74 L. 4 H H .s'i 0 0 O 0 0 ` Z Z O ?� :U ft+ Z 0 '0 '�fi7 DI C so 17 10 O ?� X H IHi Or A pi y" Y C9 C •N . DI 0 Z yy M � • 0H t=f 0 0 0 t" VU1 x to x 03x tt'' '0 I z C t" H 7C tI C 0 H x o V1 t7 w X m H H C 0 C z x X 0 Co Co C w H t' Uti V1 H PO n 'V UI Co 0 0H K CA H • 0 MI rb 7AC to C9 H C < C/f ..I X 1-1A N O U V! H x A M K 'O ,H 0 0 H to V 0 H A A H C 0 0 Y UI PCI t=f >4 C 0 UI 0 0 t• o �1 ;?U± H 'V C 'If 'V x ttDI h t' H H Z 3 DI H t' U A H H A tI H x y z b A C H H 1-1 0 C 0 0 DI H 0 0 C CA1] p Df N H yx W U UI A 5y H H C C xU y H y UI H H Uf '0 b H H 'V Vl A b H to H ro ro HH U t" UI 0 K H DI tO X1 t9 H H t9 70 H x 0 Zy N H tA�1 tin tin y H 0 DI C tt r z x A x A H UI O DI 0 CO Di V1 CO CA H Z H Z O 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0% 0 0 0 10 0 A 03 w r w 0% 10 0% UI 0% (.W r 00 10 20 A N w N r A r A 03 A (.W N A r I A r O r r r r 10 r UI r r 01 0 r A 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I CO 0 A w A A A A W A A A A A N A U C N A W w N N r N w N w (.W N (.J MI x A .d r (.1 r r 0 A r r w 10 r 0% H O -a 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 L... 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0o N 0 r CO 0 H. 0 0 0 0 0 0 H Io H 0 t.+ 07 0 H N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N A A 0 A 0% 0 rUI J w W w w w w N 10 w w 0 N A 0 0 UI UI UI UI UUI U I I UI UI 0% UI A N w r Ut r 0 10 H A C9 Z 0 oa o mil UI m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Ura X x W 3 x x R1 03 RI 01 Id 03 x x C it UI A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A t r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * A co v co v co v w V oo V Co V CO V CO V Cu V Cu V CO V Co V 74 n J J J J J J J J J 0% a% 0% H w J O% U, A W N r 0 10 m -3 x ti O I-. r r r r r r r r r r r r r H H A x 10 10 14 10 10 10 V) 10 '.0 VD '.0 10 '.0 %0 'D x Cil '.0 '.0 '.0 '.0 'D %o '0 '.0 %o '.0 'D '.0 '0 '0 %D 'D Cil n L., w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w A 74 S � �.., � � � � � ..... 79 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0 C9 5 �� . \ \ ...... ..... 3Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H to UI UI UI UI (A U1 UI U1 to to UI UI VI UI to ti Vl H Cl A ;V x N NCti A r r y 4f 711 xH w w f-, r Cl) . 'Cl) N 'Cl) in <A 'Cl) 'Cl) 'Cl) 'Cl) N 'Cl) 'Cl) 4f 'Cl) 0 A N 4f CO CO H r w L4 A A J J N J A 'Cl) 'Cl) 'Cl) N 1.4 N N A w 'Cl) 0 0% 0% •0% •0% •UI •UI •0) a) Ut to •0 •0 •N •a% t•o •r •r J J 'Cl) 4f w J 10 Ut r A 0 O a% a\ O O Ut UI N N to to 0 0 to J .J VI UI U1 UI IJI ut A A U7 O VI '0 [ t7 • • • • • • • • • ON N N Ui to 0 0 UI to 0 0 0 0 r N %0 0 0 %0 '.D r r J to N O O to Hx A 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r O 0 0 N N r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A * * * * * * * * * * * * w r O 0 q x H M n 3 M ?� Y r 2, H V rJ V O t9 t9 b R+ N X M 23 M 1/40 7C x M A x x X x cn to Cil Cxx9 til N MI C0 H CO 0 0 b H CA H H H H H ACrl 7:1 C Z O O H co Di p:17�o tVV'' 0 Cl r C C 7 C7 w til < y H Hx o M4 tTi fn CA CO M Z 7O ti 0 COZH 7°d M H 7:1 0x Z A H Z Cl A 0 C 't7 A A 13 S+ b0 0 roH A A A A 0 �y HH 0 y tl1 ?+ O O O O CI DI Xi PIJ C A H H CO A ;V CA M. x AAA A K H x C9 V) H H FH-1 \ x x M M PC) 0 En 0 z Z H H H Z C m m xi z EZ rti CI CA P:i Cil ro ro H y 0 0 y a Gi A cm CA C H t=1 h9 t=1 A K r 0 0 K o 70 CO b H 04 b b b H V Z 21 21 2, 2, H C0 H Di 1-4 t4 C cii H H y [9 CO CO °x cyt�l �l � Cn co H z H Z 10 0 0 0 '.D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1/4t, '.O 'O co w r r 0) w w r r r ON ON CO CO CO 03 b A N A N A N r A J N A A A A A A 0C) r N to 0I I r r N 01 r r r 0 0 0 0 A N A A A N I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I CO A A A A A A A N Al N N M R N N w w . w w w w . N W N N N N M1 I-. r Co r r 10 r A A W r w r r H r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 0 `0 r 0 0 ‘0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 %O 10 Aa+ 00 0 0 0 0 0% an aI J H 0 � r 0 a 0DJ N O O O O o O co 0o x I-.A O Ow H Co w w w w w w to ON UI N C UTl CT 0% ON a' T 0% ON UI 0 UI A N w w r 0 CO H A C9 Z 0 Iro CO 0 CI 7/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o I bw x x x x x x x x 04 x x x x x x 21 0 co a, n n x o A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Cil r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r n CO v Co v Co v Co v CO v 03 v Co v CO v CO v CO v 03 v CO V Co 73 n vO Co co Co 03 Co 07 Co Co Co Co J J H O '.O CO J ON l71 A W N H 0 'o Co 'Z' r 0 A r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r n x t0 '.0 '.0 10 1/40 10 10 1/40 '.O '.O '0 10 10 1/40 10 10 x C9 10 10 10 1/40 VO 10 ka 'o t0 so '.o '.o '.0 '.0 %0 '0 t9 n La w w w w w w w w w w w w W W w n x ,„ — s., 5.„ � — — —. ——. ,, x O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r t7 t9 5, 55'— — b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H N1 Ut Ui U1 V7 LA Ui Ut N U1 U1 UI Ut U1 VI IA t=1 N H CI n z x tl n u► ill to <n 7C H N N r r r x Lf N to Lf N LI VI 4f Lf Lf 4f N N N Lf N N N C 41 41 W J J N N 10 '0 N N H r r r N N r H Lf 41 N N 0'. N W W tJ O% W W W W W (W r H N N H H 10 '.O 0 0 U1 Ut W W A A J J N H U1 0 H Ut to UI Ut 0 0 LA LA A A N N N N W W '.O 10 W W ON ON W 0 '.0 1,31 O 0 LI O J J 0 0 U1 to U1 UI J J U1 UI J J A A 0 0 J J H r r O A O H H n O O 0 0 0 01 ON 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 VI N 0 0 J J A A 0 0 0 0 0 * * * * * * * * * * * * W r ` Cl) COCOCl) 70 70 b '0 b 0 Z Z ZZZZ n n n yq H [ 3r Cl) Cl) 0 0 0 0 1- o O x x x [8 y H CSI n t9 PO '0 < < < < ko H Z H 0 Cl) t" n Z Y 3y 7 3y so H HH- r CO H x X Cl) 7C 7C 7v x N H ;OU _7nC CON VI Di CH0.< x b t" [H H x=1 1111 Com'' P P P ` . O x H 7 RI 0 C n n n CO < Co 3" H 70 M 3y N x 7V x 74 C!1 w 70 < H t=1 H x CO n Z w CO H 7o x n Cl) 0 0 o O z N P3 n PT;NI o Poo 74 t9 0 O 0 H C') CO Z 7o n '=1 n H H CO O '0 A C9 CDC C •n n n n H rC� H H • • • r 0 '0 y H C') 0 U1 H H 1-4 0 0 0 0 1-4 ',D • • • • Z 0 tr1 d SJ t=1 N 'fit t7 H H C n < r H H C) w 3 H H H OACIA CC CM Z H CO xCl1 Z K K = x x 7o x 7o x x '111 Z Co 0 Z H H 0 3+ ?+ Y ?+ 0 C9 7o Cx'I 0 0 O CA CO CO cn !n C9 H UCO 0 xi y > 70 73 C') DI tll � n CO 4-4 H C r H < < x b Cl) Z b Z 1-4 H b '1:3 '13 b H 3+ H H '0 Of H n n b 3y 311 Y '0 Z H 7Mo x CO y y K H CO CO CO H CO CO Z CO 0 tq t9 tO t9 CO CO O to o% 0 0 0 a'% 0 0 0 0 0 '0 10 %0 I-• Co Ut H A I0 0 r r r A A Co CO CO CO I 3y W A co J A H 03 H N 00 N Al A A A A n H 0 'o H r r UI H r r J J 0 0 0 0 n I I I I i I I I I I I I I I i I CO O A N A A A A A A A A A A N N N N 71 W N to W N N W H 01 N W GJ N N N N 70 7. r H W W 41 r r N to W 03 03 r H r H f-] ON 0 0 0 0 0 O r 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 %o A 0 O J '0 0 r J 0 0 ga vO ko 10 0 ON V1 0 0 J H 0 r 0 0 0 Cr. J m W H 0 03 N 0 0 U1 N 0 N A 0 0 A 0 UI co Z 44 N ch W tJ '0 W W ON r W W w r r 0 J J J w O' 0 '0 at a% 0 N r 0 A 4) UI J 0' H n DI x 0 Iro CO CO 7o b Co O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 w x x x x x x CO x CO x x x xxxx a) J 0 A x o A A A A A A A A A A A A A AO A A A A A A A A A t1 I-. * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * r * A %D V .O v so v m v co V cu V O V CO V CO V CO V CO V CO V 74 A O 0 0 .0 .0 .0 .0 '.0 '.0 V0 %D %0 H N H 0 '.D CO J T ut A W N r Z r 0 A r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r A x 10 10 '0 %0 '.0 '.D '0 %0 VD %D '.0 %0 %0 'D '0 '.D x C+1 '.0 '.D '.D %0 %D '0 '.D %0 'D '.D 'D '0 %0 10 '.0 10 C8 A w w w w w w w w w w w c.1 w w w w A N o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o O O o xi r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0 C9 \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ > 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H o vl u1 to cn vi Ln ul ut w u1 Uf Ui UI Ui v+ t9 CA H 71 A 74 x -co71 to 4/1 IA 0 r N r r to Vf 71 H N N ON ON A A Z V/ IA 41 to (A <A L) - C I-• ON to U1 Cl) V) Cl) Cl) in A A 4) to L) fA N N 0% ON ON 0% 0) fA %0 'D L) 3, A N O1 N W HH r HUI In N L) CO A r N 07 CO CO CO CO CO W W A A 0% 0 LII 0% 0% CO H U1 V1 r r 0 0 A A r W N VI W W A A r r J J J J r d 71 O co N '.0 O% 'D '0 r r 0 0 N N to U1 %D 0 A A 0 0 J J 0 0 .0 sD 0 H n o 0% '.O A W N N J J 0 0 A A A U1 '0 0 CO O 0 0 0% 0% r r '.D '.0 0 * * * * * * * * * * * * w H , C C C C H H H CA N 111 y Cl) CA CA y y Xi x C H H H H H ro 'V = r to to U1 CA H t9 A b O O O C xi [=1 10 0 N C9 A A A C. '9 C] H b 10 ,c1 CV CV � H Cl) 0 74 7C 74 0 b Z r n1 COA H H H CC') Cl) Cl) CI CO CO 01 'V A Cl) H C9 A H r > 71 b x H C') xy co A A A 0 xy H x1 x1 x1 to d t9 C J 0 0 0 H C A x1 x1 x1 CV C') w Cl)• Iii H C) ?� k K K Io CI ZH 10 0 W M 0 Z 0 A A X Z A 3 0 C9 0 '0 H 71 H 0 0 A 0 H H O t9 b X 'V C9 0 71 TO 71 b b '0 ro 10 7:1 H 74 lO H 71 u b t� DI • t� t� H °) 0 '°V H DI DI P 'V t9 C9 C9 b O x a x H H A H r r H X Cl) r Cl) Z C=1 O C9 O H H x H \\ N CI Co [+ Cl) Cal Z Z Z Z Z i' Z CA CA Z Z H ' H 0 C9 H t9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 CZj1 0 H Vi Cl) Cl) C9 Cl) CA N N > 0 .b A 'VC 'V "O b ''V to y 11 H r Cl)[ [, H t4iv t' K t' CH=1 CH9 r H DI C!)CA CA H H H b H Z Z H 71 71 71 H Ch C!) m CV A A Ch Z C C 0 Cl) Cl) r CA D1 C9 N y H H Z Cr) Z A A A C8 t9 DI Cr, CA O 0 ON 0 0 0 '.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 W A N 0• 0' w CO W r r r A 10 0 r w I-, H H N N N A r A J r A H O %0 N (7 I-% r N CO .0 r 0 N N 0% r r r r r r C) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I c0 O A A A A A A N A A A A A A W A A Cl C W W U1 W N N N N W W N N W 0% W U1 x1 Z N N U1 N r H H r W W r A r N r U1 H 0 r o r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 UI 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W H O 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LI W W W A w %0 w W W W w w W w '.0 03 07 CO CO J J J J J J J J J W 0 H 0 0 0 .0 Co J J J 0% U1 A W 0 H A CII Z 0 DI o CI 7y b O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0lO 03 x xxx x x x x x x x x x as x x m CO