HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/04/1992 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items
DATE: July 31, 1992
1. Attached is the calendar for August of Upcoming Meetings.
2 . Attached is the August Business Update from City Hall.
3. Attached are the agendas for the August 6, 1992 meetings of
the Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment & Appeals.
4. Attached is the Police Newsletter for Council review.
5. Attached is correspondence from the Mayor of Eagle Lake
inviting elected officials to the League of Minnesota Cities'
regional meeting on September 1, 1992 . If you are interested
in attending, please call Toni to make reservations by August
11th.
6. Attached is a memorandum from the City Attorney regarding
Constitutionality of Liquor Ordinances.
7. Attached is correspondence regarding the purchase of property,
Market Street for your information.
8 . Attached is a memorandum from the Public Works Director
regarding Minnesota/Market Street Railroad Crossings.
9 . Attached are the June 1, June 9 and July 2, 1992 minutes of
the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission meetings.
10. Attached is a comparison of payable 1992 Commercial/Industrial
property taxes that staff received from Jon Albinson for
Councils information.
11. Attached are the July 15, 1992 minutes of the Shakopee
Community Development Commission.
12. Attached is a memorandum from the City Administrator regarding
the status of the Mdewakanton Sioux Community Community
Center.
August 1992
Upcoming Meetings
SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
4:30pn Ptlic 7:OOpa.City 7:30pm Planning DERBY DAYS
Illi li ties Ca>K�l
Commission
Meeting
g 10 11 12 13 14 15
7:00pa
Caen ttee of
the Whole
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
7:00pm City 5:30pm
Comm il Cpmavniy
Meeting Development
Casmiss i on
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
7:00ps Park and 7:00p
Recreation Committee of
Board the Whole
30 31 duly September
SMTWTF S SMT W TF S
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
26 27 28 29 30 31 27 28 29 30
ot
BUSINESS UPDATE FROM CITY HALL
Vol. 6 No. 8
Dear Chamber Member: August 1, 1992
City Clerk Pre-testing of the survey questionnaire has
already begun. Staff is optimistic that the
At their regular meeting on July 7th, City Council random sample telephone survey will formally
proceed in early August. Staff expects that the
accepted the resignation of Ron Larson from the survey results will be available some time in
Park and Recreation Advisory Board. Anyone September.
interested in filling the unexpired term may obtain
an application by calling city hall at 445-3650. On August 4, 1992 the Shakopee/Prior Lake Hockey
At their regular meeting on July 7th, City Council Association will be present at the City Council
aadopted a resolution commending the Shakopee meeting to discuss possible ell
for
Public Utilities and their Manager, Lou Van Hout, constructing a permanent shell around the
for their foresight and diligence in reviewing and existing facility.
selecting a power supplier who will provide The City has hired an architect to assist in
wholesale power which will result in a substantial developing plans and specifications for
savings to Shakopee Public Utilities and its improvements to the concession stand/restroom
customers. facility at Tahpah Park. Funding for the
At their regular meeting on July 21,City Council improvements are being provided by the Shakopee
Jaycees. The project will bring the facility
adopted resolutions of commendation to two city into
employees who have just completed 25 years of
fomPBauce with ADA Standards and also provide
or the extension of two new wings to the shelter
employment with the City of Shakopee: Donald f
Bisek, Police Department, and Harold Pass, Public with improvements to the concession stand area.
Works Department. Staff is optimistic that the project will be
completed yet this year.
Additional election judges are still needed for the Park and Recreation
upcoming elections, especially in the 4th precinct.
If interested, please call city hall during regular
business hours. The summer recreation programs are winding
down and plans for fall activities are well
Community Development underway. The Shakopee Community Education
and Park and Recreation joint publication of fall
programs and activities will be mailed to area
On July 7,1992 the Shakopee City Council approved residents on August 28th.
the questionnaire for the Municipal Facility
Survey: The questionnaire is comprised of over LSO The Shakopee School District reinstated some of
questions that address issues in the following the seventh and eighth grade student activities
areas: park and recreation, downtown dropped in 1982 because of budget restraints.
redevelopment, and municipal level of services. Since then, Shakopee Community Recreation had
Funding for the survey will be allocated from 3 been administering some of those activities using
separate funding sources including the Park volunteers. Some of the programs that are being
Reserve Fund, Housing and Redevelopment reintroduced include 7th and 8th grade Girls' and
Authority Budget and the Administration Division Boys' Sports, Co-ed Sports, and academic dubs.
of the 1992 General Fund Budget.
Planning At this same meeting, the Commission also
recommended three vacations. They
At the July 9, 1992,meeting of the Shakopee Board recommended the vacation of a portion of the 10th
of Adjustment and Appeals, the board denied an Avenue right-of-way between County Road 17and
application for a variance to the side yard setback the mid-block area west of Merrifield Street. This
within the Shoreland zoning district to allow for vacation would reduce the 100 foot right-of-way
an addition onto an attached garage. in this area to 66 feet, while reserving drainage
and utility easements up to the current 100 foot
At the July 9, 1992, meeting of the Shakopee right-of-way line. The Commission also
Planning Commission, the Commission continued reeommended the vacation of a portion of the
the public hearing for an application for an alley just south of Norwest bank, and the vacation
amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for of 5 feet of the 15 foot wide drainage and utility
N.B.Z. Enterprises, Inc. This amendment would easements in Lot 1, Block 2, and Lot I, Block 3,
allow two propane heating tanks. The public Prairie Estates 2nd Addition.
hearing was continued to the August 6, 1992,
meeting. Public Works/Engineering
The Commission also recommended approval of Several new subdivisions are under construction
two preliminary plats and four final plats. The requiring Engineering Department inspection.
preliminary plat for Maple Trails Estates is The following subdivisions are now under
proposed to be located east of County Road 17, construction:
across from Timber Trails Addition, and would
consist of 31 single family lots. They also *Minnesota Valley 7th Addition
recommended approval of the preliminary and (Polk St. & Ilth Ave.)
final plat for Dalles Townhome Addition. The *Meadows 7th and 8th Additions
development plan for the Planned Unit (CR 79 South of 11th Ave.)
Development for this site was recently approved *Prairie Estates 2nd Addition
by the City Council. This approval allows the (CR 17 South of 11th Ave.)
construction of twelve structures, each containing *Beckrich Estates (CR 79& CR 78)
four units, on the site. •Weinandt Acres 2nd Addition
(CR 17 South of CR 42)
The final plats for Heritage Place 4th Addition and
The Meadows 8th Addition w ere also The Public Works Department is landscaping and
recommended for approval. Heritage Place 4th putting the finishing touches on the new Scenic
Addition will be located north of Vierling Drive, Heights Park (formerly JEJ Park). This park will
east of Granite Drive, and south of Murphy contain an outdoor hockey rink, warming house,
Avenue. It will contain 27 residential lots. The basketball court, general skating area, picnic
Meadows 8th Addition will be located south of shelter and walking trails. The park is located at
Vierling Drive, west of The Meadows 7th Addition, the end of Ruby Lane, north of Vierling Drive.
and will contain 52 residential lots.
The completion of the Market Street and
The Commission also recommended approval of Minnesota Street railroad crossings along 2nd
amendments to two Planned Unit Developments. Ave. has been delayed due to the signal installation
The amendment to the Planned Unit Development by the C & NW Railroad. The exact schedulefor
for High Five Erectors, Inc. would permit outdoor the railroads work has not been determined yet.
storage of up to 15 feet in height in certain areas
of the site. The amendment to the Planned Unit The downtown streets are being sealed with an
Development for Shakopee Towing and Storage asphalt emulsion to seal cracks in the pavement
would permit the construction of a fifth mini- and to extend the life of the streets. The work is
storage building. being done in late afternoons and nights to try
and minimize the disruption to downtown
businesses. The work should be completed by July
24, 1992.
43
TENTATIVE AGENDA,
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
Regular Session Shakopee, MN August 6, 1992
Chairperson William Mars Presiding
1. Roll Call at 7:30 P.M.
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Approval of July 9, 1992, Meeting Minutes
4. Recognition by Board of Adjustments and Appeals of Interested
citizens.
6. 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider a variance to the front
yard setback at 730 W. 3rd Avenue to build an addition onto an
existing building.
Applicant: Shakopee Services
Action: Resolution No. 643
6. Other Business
a.
b.
c.
7. Adjourn
Lindberg S. Ekola
City Planner
NOTE TO THE B.O.A.A. MEMBERS:
1. If you have any questions or need additional information on
any of the above items, please call Terris or Aggie on the
Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting.
2. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the
Planning Department prior to the meeting.
r
TENTATIVE AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular Session Shakopee, MN August 6, 1992
Chairperson Terry Joos Presiding
1. Roll Call at 7:30 P.M.
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Approval of the July 9, 1992, Meeting Minutes
4. Recognition by Planning Commission of Interested Citizens.
5. 7:40 P.M. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an amendment
to Conditional Use Permit No. 376 for NBZ Mining to allow two
propane tanks for heating on the property located south of CR
16, west of CR 83 and north of Valley View Rd.
Applicant: NBZ Enterprises, Inc.
Action: Amend Conditional Use Permit No. 376
6. 7:50 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the rezoning of
property south of Clifton Townhomes from R-4 and R-2 to R-3.
Applicant: LeRoy Menke
7. 8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider a Planned Unit
Development consisting of two 3 & 4 unit townhomes, located
south of Clifton Townhomes.
Applicant: LeRoy Menke
8. Vacation: To consider the vacation of the alley in the 800
Block, South of E. 1st Ave. (Red Owl Block) .
Applicant: Jeff Segal
9. FINAL PLAT: To consider an application for the final plat of
Market Place, lying west of Market St. and north of 5th
Avenue.
Applicant: Dave Rutt and Merle Volk
Action: Final Plat Approval
10. Annual Review: J. L. Shiely Mineral Extracti* Permit ' f `
11. Capital Improvement Program
12. Sidewalk/Trail Plan
13. Other Business
A. Electing representatives to Met. Council
B.
C.
14. Adjourn
Lindberg S. Ekola
City Planner
NOTE TO PLANNING MEMBERS;
1. If you have any questions or need additional information on
any of the above items, please call Terrie or Aggie on the
Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting at 445-3650.
2. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the
Planning Department prior to the meeting.
44s
CITY OF EAGLE LAKE
INCORPORATED 1902
July 23 , 1992
Dear City Official :
I wish to extend to you a cordial invitation to attend
the League of Minnesota Cities' regional meeting hosted by
the City of Eagle Lake on Tuesday, September 1, 1992 , at the
Eagle Lake American Legion Club .
The afternoon program, beginning at 2 : 30 p.m. will
cover a variety of subjects during a roundtable discussion,
including solid waste programs , "what cities around the
state are doing" and the new Transportation Utility Fee.
At 3 : 30 p.m. a discussion will cover fire relief
association activities and at 4: 00 p.m. a presentation will
address council/staff relations and the need for performance
appraisals . Because of the importance of this subject, the
League is asking that at least one elected official from
each city be present .
The afternoon program, concluding at 5 : 00 p.m. will he
followed by a social and then dinner at 6: 15 p.m.
Following a welcome to our city from me, LMC President
Larry Bakken will address the audience regarding the
organization ' s focus for the coming year . After the
President ' s message, the League will present its new video
followed by a discussion of legislative matters, including
the status of the process to develop a new local government
aid (LGA) formula. The meeting will conclude with door
prizes , including a free registration to the 1993 annual.
conference in St . Cloud.
To make reservations for your city, please return the
enclosed registration form as soon as possible. In case of
cancellations , please notify Joanne Kopet, City Clerk, by
Friday, August 28, 1992. Your city will be billed for those
who did not attend and did not cancel their reservations by
the cancellation date.
I look forward to seeing you on Tuesday, September 1st .
1/Sincerely,
!rir iC J ( j�l
Bryce Olson
Mayor
City of Eagle Lake
101 PLAINVIEW • P.0.159 • EAGLE LAKE, MN 56024 • (507) 257-3218
#_)
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Karen Marty, City Attorney
DATE: July 24, 1992
RE: Constitutionality of Liquor Ordinances
A few months ago I filed criminal charges against Cheers 2
Ya for violating the liquor ordinances by remaining open after
hours. This case has made its way through the court, and is set
for trial in August. The attorney for Cheers has filed a motion
seeking to have our liquor ordinances declared unconstitutional.
I am preparing a brief, and we will have a ruling on this in a
couple of weeks.
This is just FYI.
Signed iii . a/, ��
Karen Mar , ity -•ttorney
KEM:bjm
[22MEMO]
cc: Dennis Kraft
* 17
p?M
July 18, 1992
Mr. David Brown, Attorney
206 South Scott Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
RE: Purchase of property, Market Street, Shakopee
Dear Dave:This is to inform you that any purchase agreement you wish to
present on the above property should be submitted to Jane DuBois at
Coidwell Banker Best Homes, 327 South Marschall Road, Suite #300 ,
Shakopee, no later than 7:00 PM on Tuesday, July 21st.
Your purchase agreement along with any additional offers will be
presented to the ERA at their meeting that evening.
For the record, Article 22 of the Code of Ethics of the National
Association of Realtors, which you probably have never read, says
"Negotiations concerning property which is listed exclusively shall
be carried on with the listing broker, not the owner, except with
the consent of the listing broker. ' Your interference with my
fiduciary duty to the principals was inappropriate and highly
unprofessional.
If you have any questions, please call me.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Jane C. DuBois
JD:dh
# 8'
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Minnesota/Market Street Railroad Crossings
DATE: July 29, 1992
NON-AGENDA INFORMATIONAL ITEM FOR COUNCIL:
Staff would like to provide Council with a status update on the
railroad crossings at Minnesota Street and Market Street.
On May 19, 1992 the City Council authorized staff to execute the
agreements for the new crossings with the railroad and to forward
a check for $147,000.00 to the railroad for the new crossings,
signals, etc. The check was sent to the railroad on June 25, 1992.
Within a few weeks of that action, a fully executed agreement from
the railroad was received by City staff.
Since receiving the fully signed agreement, staff has contacted the
railroad several times to determine when they would construct the
crossings. To date, the railroad has not provided staff with any
type of schedule for completing this work and have refused to
respond to requests for such a schedule.
Staff will continue to pursue getting the railroad to complete
their work on the crossings, but staff wanted to inform the City
Council the reasons for the delays. The City contractor for the
street construction is also being held up until the railroad has
done their work.
If City Council members have any additional suggestions for ways to
expedite the railroads actions, please advise staff.
DH/pmp
RAILROAD
01
MINUTES
OF THE
SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in regular
session on June 1 , 1992 at 4:30 P.M. in the Utilities Meeting room.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Kirchmeier, Cook and O'Toole.
Also Liaison Sweeney, Manager Van Hout and Secretary Menden.
Motion by O'Toole, seconded by Kirchmeier that the minutes of
the May 4, 1992 regular meeting and the May 18, 1992 special
meeting be approved as kept. Motion carried.
BILLS READ:
City of Shakopee 20 ,032. 00
A & B Auto Electric Inc . 127 . 00
ARA/Cory Refreshment Services 104 .00
Advanced Mailing Systems 3,605 .00
American Public Power Assn 2,428 .04
Marvin Athmann 141. 00
Battery & Tire Warehouse Inc. 25.69
R.W. Beck and Associates 4,650. 64
Bentz Construction Inc . 3 ,300. 00
Border States Electric Supply 1,149. 10
Business Essentials Inc . 337 .43
Canterbury Downs 3, 915.00
City of Shakopee 404 .02
City of Shakopee 943 .41
Clay's Printing Service 105 .40
Communication Auditors 46. 47
Cooperative Power 37 ,314 . 09
Cy' s Amoco and Tire 22. 50
Direct Safety Co. 43 . 94
Eddy Bros. Co. 6 . 00
FMG/Tsumura 6, 778. 76
Feed-Rite Controls Inc. 1 , 566 . 64
Four Seasons Motel Restaurant & Lounge 144 . 78
General Office Products Co. 110 .97
Glenwood Inglewood 13.40
Gopher State One-Call Inc. 583. 50
Graybar Electric Co. Inc. 2,406. 29
H D R 2 ,971.00
Hennen ' s ICO 7 .00
Hance Cable Testing & Locating 219.00
Jerry' s Lawn Service 818.00
Koch ' s Tele-Communication Services 60.00
Lathrop Paint Supply co. 21. 45
Leef Bros . , Inc . 22. 62
Ray Lemieux 67.92
•
• M R Sign 17.96
M-V Gas Co. - 8.25
Michael Mahoney 4,000. 00
Metro Sales Inc. 130. 95
Minn.Board of Architecture, 70. 00
Minn. Valley Testing Lab. Inc. 70.00
Motor Parts Service Co. Inc. 141 . 97
Northern Sanitary Supply Co. Inc. 169. 35
Northern States Power Co. 389 ,818.16
Northern States Power Co. 1,151.49
Northern States Power Co. 332. 32
On Site Environmental Ser. Inc . 229.00
Gene Pass 26.00
Pitney Bowes 924 .38
Remarkable Products 17 . 95
Reynolds Welding Supply Co. 15. 10
Road Machinery & Supplies Co. 800.45
St. Francis Medical Facility 6,264 .00
St. Mary' s Church of the Purification 530 .40
Schiltz Ornamental Iron 1,145.00
Schmader Electric Const. Co. 229, 565 .20
Scott County Sheriff Communications 663 . 30
Sensus Technologies, Inc. 677 .02
Shakopee Chev-Olds-Pont Geo Inc. 225 .27
Shakopee Ford 94 .23
Shakopee Public Utilities Comm. 129 .61
Al Smith Excavating 733. 00
Southwest Suburban Publishing 278. 92
Starks Cleaning Services Inc. 68. 00
Stemmer Farm & Garden Supply Inc. 138.00
Dean Struck 77 . 52
T & R Service 34 . 00
Total Tool 266. 15
Transport White GMC, Inc. 35. 00
Trio Tree Nursery & Landscaping 40. 50
Lou VanHout 123 .18
Lou VanHout 2,106.60
Warning Lites of MN 281 . 50
Water Pro 91 .11
Wheeler Lumber Operations 4,888. 50
Woodhill Business Products 1,766 . 73
Yarusso' s Hardware Co. 45. 96
American Public Power Assn 35. 00
Motion by Cook, seconded by O'Toole that the bills be
allowed and ordered paid. Motion carried.
A communication from Manager Van Mout to St. Mary's
Purification Church of Marystown was acknowledged.
Liaison Sweeney gave the liaison report .
The bid tabulations for a new telescopic material handling
aerial device and fiberglass service body-mounted over the rear
axle of an acceptable cab and chassis were given to the Commission
from Terrill Roquette, Technical Assistant.
Darrol Mason of Simon-Midwest was present .
Motion by O'Toole, seconded by Cook to award the bid to
Simon-Midwest, Inc. for a total bid price of $95,197.00, with
the option of a trade-in allowance or selling the old truck
outright to be decided at the time the purchase order is written.
Motion carried.
A discussion was held on the electronic funds transfer for
automatic withdrawals for customers bills. Further communications
will be held with area banks.
Jim Streef land, Jaspers, Streef land Co. was present to present
the 1991 audit .
Motion by Cook, seconded by O'Toole to accept the 1991 audit
from Jaspers, Streef land Co. Motion carried.
Present for the discussion on the selection of a power
supplier were Sheila Effertz, Shakopee Valley News; Tony Rude,
UPA; Derrick Dahlen, MMPA; Jim Ashley, Mark Ellson and Don Kom
of Northern States Power Co. ; Kevin Favero, R.W. Beck.
Mr. Dahlen presented the power supply offer from the MMPA.
The offer was for wholesale power sale from July 1 , 1995 through
December 31 , 2005, at a rate fixed for each year, and is open for
four to six weeks. Mr. Rude discussed the guarantee of the
MMPA offer by UPA.
Mr. Ashley presented a draft of contract which would accompany
their most recent offer for wholesale power at fixed rates. The
NSP offer would run from January 1 , 1993 through December 31, 2005,
at a rate fixed for each year, and is open until June 30, 1992.
Kevin Favero was asked to review the offer from MMPA, and
the contract drafts of NSP and MMPA.
A special meeting of the Utilities Commission will be held
on June 9, 1992 to review the offers and select the power
supplier.
Motion by Cook, seconded by O'Toole to offer Resolution#386
A Resolution Setting the Amount of . the Trunk Water Charge,
Approving Of Its Collection, and Authorizing Water Service to
Certain Property Described as Eagle Creek Junction Third Addition.
Ayes: Commissioners O'Toole, Cook and Kirchmeier. Nayes : none.
Resolution passed. Motion carried.
There were no new plats for May, 1992.
There were three fire calls for a total of two and one/half
hours labor.
There were no lost time accidents for the month of May, 1992.
The Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association delegate
appointment will be made by first appointment to the Utilities
Manager, next Commission President, next two Commissioners by
seniority and last Office Manager.
Motion by O'Toole, seconded by Kirchmeier that the meeting
be adjourned to 4: 30 P.M. on June 9, 1992. Motion carried.
1
�
1 X1,5 u; i �
Barbara Menden, Commission Secretary
MINUTES
OF THE
SHAKOFEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in adjourned
regular session cn June 9 , 1992 at 4 : 30 P.M . in the Utilities
meeting room.
MEMBERS PRESENT : Cor:-; ss_nners Kirchmeier, Cook and O' Toole .
Also Liaison Sweeney and Manager Van Rout . Secretary Menden was
absent .
Jim Ashley, NEP Director of wholesale Marketing; Don Kom, NSP
Municipal Sales Representative; and Sheila Effertz from the
Shakopee Valley News were also present .
Manage— Van Rout advised that a revised offer from the MMPA had
been received this afternoon , and that Kevin Favero was analyzing
the revised offer and would arrive later.
The meeting was called to order by President Kirchmeier.
The Commission discussed with the NSF representatives the June 4 ,
1992 letter from NSF and other items .
Mr. Favero , consulting engineer to the Commission , arrived with
his analysis of the recent power supply offer from the MNPA , and
a comparison with offers from other suppliers , including NSP .
The Commission discussed the desireability of initially receiving
Mr . Faverc ' s analysis privately so as not to give undue competitive
advantage to MMPA or NSF , with the analysis and other information
used in reachinci a decision , to be available before action was
taken by the Cerci ssion on any of the proposals .
The NSF representatives expressed no objection. Ms . Effertz
requested that she be notified about the Commission ' s decision on
the power supplier when the Commission meeting concluded.
There being no objection raised, motion. by Terry O'Toole, seconded
by Cook : to _ closed session to review the engineer ' s
analyse_ cf the peting power supply offers . Motion carried.
At the conclusion ed the engineer' s report , there was a motion by
Cook , seconded by Yirc. meier: tc ad _ from. closed session .
Motion carried .
The NSF representatives returned to the meeting. Copies of the
engineer ' s analysis were given to the NEP representatives .
Commissioner Cook noted the difference in cost with the new
supplier . He al =so noted *he offer from the United Power
Association to match NSP ' s guarantee of keeping the rates to no
more than 95 of NSP' s General Service rate . His preference was
for the MMPA , based on the overall savings and with the assurance
. from UPA of the power availability and rates offered by the MMPA.
Commissioner Yirchmeier preferred to stay with NEP under a changed
contract , due to the power availability after 2005 , because of the
6 year commitment to buy power from NSP for the recently acquired
service area , because of the history of NSP as a known commodity ,
and because the long term goal to acquire all the service area
within city limits may be hampered by the change .
Commissioner O' Toole stated he was impressed by the MMPA being
composed cf similar members , and with the assurance from UPA as a
viable power supplier .
Discussion tock place with the NSP representatives and the engineer
about how the rates in the recently acquired service area would be
determined in the year 2003 .
Motion by O ' Toole, seconded by Cook : to take power from MMPA at
the rates and terms specified in the MMPA and UPA written offers
dated June 9 , 1992 and received just prior to this meeting, subject
to UPA ' s guarantee of the performance of MMPA and subject to the
negotiation of contracts with MMPA and UPA incorporating these
terms and other such material terms as the president may deem
necessary and appropriate upon consultation with the Utilities
Manager, Mr. Favero and legal counsel . Motion carried with
Kirchmeier opposed.
Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Cook: to make the vote
unanimous . Motion Carried.
Motion by Cock , seconded by O ' Toole : to accept the NSP fixed-rate
proposal for the acquired area only , during that time when the NSP
fixed-rate offer coincides with the time period identified in a
previous agreement with NSP , when energy used in the acquired area
is to he purchased from NEP. Motion carried.
Motion by O'Toole , seconded by Cook : offering Resolution E587 , a
resolution establishing water rates in and for the City of
Shakopee . Ayes: Cook, O'Toole , Kirchmeier. Nays : none .
Resolution adopted .
A tentative meeting date for a joint meeting with the City
Council was set for July 13 , 1992 at 7 : 30 P.M. in the Utilities
meeting room.
A. special meeting fC,r the Shakopee Public Utilities
Commission will be held on July 2 , 1992 at 4 : 30 P .M. in the
Utilities meeting room fox payment of bills .
The next regular meeting for the
.ko.Shaee Public Utilities
v ion will , July - 3 92 at 1 : 30 .
P .M.u in _ _
Ut itias meeting r0om.
Motion by Cook, seconded by Ki_chmei_r that the meeting be
adjourned. Motion carried.
0 ,7
9arbara Menden, CotimiSSiCn` Secretary
A
ATTEST : / �
L 1 /
l y� r��.. �,
Loll Van 1-icut, Manager
MINUTES
ng iz.g
SH_AKOPPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
The Shkaopee Public Utilities Commission convened in regular
session on July 2 , 1992 at 4 : 30 P .M. in the Utilities Meeting Room.
MEMBERS PRESENT : Commissioners Kirchmeier and Cook . Also
present Manager Van Mout and Secretary Menden. MEMBERS ABSENT:
Commissioner O' Toole and Liaison Sweeney .
BILLS READ:
City of Shakopee 20 ,032 . 00
ARA /CORY Refreshment Services 78 . 00
ABM Equipment & Supply Inc . 1 ,096. 08
Bill ' s Toggery 220. 46
Border States Electric Supply 1 ,918. 76
Burmeister Electric 833 . 00
City of Shakopee 233 ,188 . 17
City of Shakopee 1 ,030. 03
City of Shakopee 303 . 88
Clay ' s Printing Service 32 . 05
Communication Auditors 8 . 00
Cooperative Power 35 ,997 . 98
Di54 . 24
k Amoco 1 ,005. 50
Dickson Co.
Ditch Witch of Minn . Inc . 176 . 49
Dustcoatinc, Inc . 240 . 00
FMG/Tsumura 31 . 53
Feed-Bite Controls � 1 , 534 . 36
General Office Products Co . 77 . 45
Glenwood Inglewood 9 . 50
Gopher State One-Call 746 . 00
Gravbar Electric Co . Inc . 15 ,188 . 97
H & C Electric Supply 15 ,470. 46
H D R 2 . 415 . 25
Hance Cable Testing 8 Locating 330 . 90
Hennen ' s ICO 191 . 93
Jaspers , Streefland & Co . 7 ,600 . 00
Jerry ' s Lawn Service 818 . 00
Leef Bros Inc . 34 . 01
Ray Lemieux 60 . 00
M-V Gas Co. 17 . 58
Metro Curbing Inc . 490 . 00
Minnesota Conway 92 . 50
Minn . Municipal Utilities Ass 'n 860 . 00
Minn . Valley Electric Coop. 175 . 67
Minn . Valley Electric Coo. 37 , 340 . 25
Minnesota Valley Testing Laboratories , Inc . 70 . 00
Motor Farts Service of Shakopee 56 . 02
Northern States Power Cc . 432 , 733 . 23
Northern States Power Co . 1 , 071 . 87
Northern States Power Cc . 32
Otter Tail Power Co . 243 . 39
Gene Pass 175 . 00
Plehal Elacktopping Inc . 296 . 00
Resource Profile 650. 00
Reynolds Welding Supply Cc . 19 . 54
Schilz Ornamental Iron 12. 00
Sculpture Ice 934 . 52
Shakopee Postmaster5, 000 . 00
Shakopee Public Uti_ . ties Commission 725 . 27
Shakopee Ser:'icesenc . 43 . 67
Southwest Suburban Publishing 267 . 77
Starks Cleaning Services Inc . 72 . 42
Stemmer Farr. .& Garden 74 . 65
Dean Struck 95 . 04
Transport White GMC, Inc . 35 . 00
7 & P Service 17 . 00
Tendaire Industries , Inc . 85 . 20
Viking Steel Products, Inc . 98 . 08
Water Products 890. 00
Westinghouse Electric Supply 1 , 05£. 61
Wheeler Operations 457 . 80
larusso ' s Hardware Co . 127 . 01
F. H. Renner & Sons 2 , 589 . 75
Al Smith Excavating 840 . 00
Motion by Cook, seconded by Kirchmeier that the hills he allowed
and ordered paid . Motion carried.
Illy
e bara Menden, Cottbission Secretary
m g K 133 , °EI m a m' § m' I
OOO 0 '0 3i. �C)
mt > mmg 0@ " g -0
I
N
low
NN N .I JN JJ `�
O > T lO N O N O N I ¢ O
O
NI�D . .NI�I I � -I 3
Wa A V A N W OND -h U A J N 0 X m
J W U N O N N W 1pp0 10 J -, W
O N 0 OOD W O + L O 100 J W l N.
OD n
s
s.
a a a a a a a a a a a as 18 - 0 6 '
UJA > V`mAmUUUOU `.
UW 0s. D
to OW r ®® JNWO CO
p J (OmO � WJU0oIIm
CO
V G
O Z
la i 0
ZCZtttntErtZtIV am
mg1�fN>O Oke
aiO mJ 0N� U0 ,I 00 % �O
L a O NN a - -I NO1JA • rn
fA
NJJO Co CO -4A OCU a 1p IO 9
1� (p p0� M iq O3
OI Og
NNN ,WD OpI ON0
-hspOo� NJJ o m �0
001 -4 A OI L A N@ m A 030 -4 � O
{ W
a a a a a a a aa-SSaaal0y
N g
l
UOWULNOWJOOA 0
y. =
0 U cmLO
AmrgUNWAmto,
la , .
nil S
b-o-ocer . ---4 .0
0 .- -40 .0
0vN 0 , WOIn
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE
SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JULY 15, 1992
Chairman Mars called the meeting to order at 5:40 p.m. with the
following members present; Jon Albinson, Bill Mars, Mike Phillips
and Charles Brandmire. Commissioners Miller and Van Horn were
absent. Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator and Kate Ellis,
Community Development Intern were also present.
Albinson/Phillips moved to approve the minutes of the June 17, 1992
meeting as kept. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Stock gave a brief economic development update. He noted that
inquiries are increasing at a slow rate. He noted that earlier
today he spent an hour with a broker from Towle discussing the
possibility of locating a major industrial prospect to Shakopee.
Mr. Stock noted that the name of the prospect is confidential at
this point. He noted that the prospect is a high tech industry
that will employee in excess of 200 employees and ultimately occupy
over 250,000 square feet. Mr. Stock found the comments made by
the broker in regard to Shakopee very encouraging. Mr. Stock noted
that tax increment financing continues to be a key issue in the
mind of business prospects looking to site a facility. He noted
that Chaska and Chanhassen currently have existing tax increment
districts in place. Mr. Stock also noted that Chaska offers tax
increment up front rather than on a pay as you go basis. Mr. Stock
stated that he hoped the Shakopee City Council would favor the use
of tax increment financing to compete with our nearby communities.
Mr. Albinson stated that he is working with a prospect who needs 4
acres. He stated that the prospect meets all of the criteria set
forth in the industrial development incentive policy with the
exception of the 5 acre minimum. He stated that he hoped Council
would give consideration to this prospect in terms of utilizing tax
increment assistance if this prospect ultimately selects to locate
in Shakopee. He stated that the current industrial development
incentive policy and the five acre requirement seems to be a bit
excessive especially when the other two major criteria are met
which include 50 employee minimum and increasing the land value by
10 times. Commissioner Brandmire stated that he would favor
amending the policy to exclude the five acre minimum if the
prospect met the 50 employee minimum and 10 times the value
increase criteria. Mr. Albinson stated that he did not feel it was
necessary to pursue an amendment until such time that a prospect
such as this actually indicates a strong interest in locating in
Shakopee.
Discussion ensued on the Block 3 and 4 development analysis. Mr.
Stock stated that this evening he would like the Commission to
focus on the various development options available for Block 4.
Upon hearing tonight's comments, staff will take the options
identified and develop a cost benefit matrix for each option.
Official Proceedings of the July 15, 1992
Community Development Commission Page -2-
Discussion ensued on Option 1 - demolish existing buildings;
rebuild entirely. Mr. Albinson questioned if the image of downtown
created from scratch statement is one that we wanted to state. It
was the consensus of the Commission to delete this statement and
simply note that the block appearance will be improved. In terms
of the disadvantages for Option 1, Mr. Albinson noted that
residents and businesses would be displaced both during and after
demolition/construction. Discussion ensued on whether the downtown
area presently had an historic character. It was the consensus of
the Committee that rather than specifying that the historic
character of downtown would be severely impacted that a more
accurate statement might be that the character of downtown would be
severely impacted.
Discussion ensued on Option 2 - Combination rehabilitation and
demolition. It was the consensus of the Committee that the ability
to capture tourist customers enhanced statement should be listed as
an advantage to all of the options with the exception of maintain
the status quo. Mr. Mars stated that an additional advantage of
the Option 2 would be that the historic structures could be
highlighted (featured) under this option. It was the consensus of
the Committee to add this statement as an advantage to Option 2.
Discussion ensued on Option 3 - Status quo. No significant changes
were added by the Committee to Option 3. The Committee then
discussed Option 4 making no significant changes to Option 4.
Option 5 was deleted by the Committee since it was simply a repeat
of Option 3. Mr. Albinson suggested that a new option be added
which would call for the City acquisition of the entire block with
being improved by the City and then managed by the City in terms of
leasing. Another option discussed would be for the City to acquire
the block, improve the buildings and then sell the buildings to
prospective buyers. It was the consensus of the Committee to add
this as an option and have staff prepare the appropriate advantages
and disadvantages for review at the next meeting.
Commissioner Brandmire suggested that an option be added which
would call for the acquisition and demolition of all the buildings
with the City holding onto the property until such time as it would
be appropriate to develop. It was the consensus of the Committee
that this should also be added as an option with staff preparing
the appropriate Pros and cons for review by the Committee at a
later date.
Discussion ensued on the market survey that has been distributed to
real estate developers and brokers. Mr. Albinson stated that we
already have over a 20% response rate which is fairly good for this
type of survey. It was the consensus of the Committee that at this
time there was not adequate responses to make any firm conclusions
in regard to this survey questionnaire.
Official Proceedings of the July 15, 1992
Community Development Commission Page -3-
Mr. Albinson gave a brief update on the highway projects. He noted
that some of the bid lettings on the Southerly Bypass have been
pushed back but that the final project completion dates still seem
possible.
Mr. Stock gave a brief Scott County Economic Development Coalition
report. He noted that a salesperson has been hired by U.S.
Impressions, Inc. to sell advertising for the resource profile that
is being developed. Mr. Stock stated that he is optimistic that
the profile will be complete this fall. Mr. Stock also noted that
the Coalition will be sponsoring a Economic Development Day in
either March or April of 1993 .
Brandmire/Phillips moved to adjourn the meeting at 6: 30 p.m.
Motion carried unanimously.
Barry A. Stock
Recording Secretary
#/02
MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
RE: Status of the Mdewakanton Sioux Community
Community Center
DATE: July 30, 1992
As directed by the City Council I have followed up on the question
of the current status of the Sioux Community constructing a
community center for usage by residents of Shakopee and other
nearby communities. My discussion this week with the Engineer
working on the project has indicated that they are on schedule, and
that the Tribal Business Council and the Tribal Council will most
likely be acting on the question of a community center some time
during the month of August. In any case the information will be
presented to these two bodies, however I can not say, nor could the
Engineer, whether a decision will be rendered at that time.
According to the present conceptual design, if a community center
were to be constructed it would include an ice sheet. Of course,
the design could be changed during the review process.
TENTATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AUGUST 4, 1992
Mayor Gary Laurent presiding
1] Roll Call at 7: 00 P.M.
2] Approval of Agenda
3] Recess for H.R.A. Meeting
4] Re-convene
5] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers
6] Mayor's Report
7] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS
8] Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an
asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council
and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember
so requests, in which event the item will be removed from
the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence
on the agenda. )
*9] Approval of the Minutes of July 21, 1992
10] Communications:
*a] Kmart Corporation regarding work force reduction.
11] Public Hearings: None
12] Boards and Commissions: None
13] Reports from Staff:
a] Shakopee Valley Ice Arena
*b] Traffic Signal at CR-16 and CR-B3
*c] Temporary Beer License - Shakopee Jaycees
*d] Approving Contract With Bossardt Associates For Construc-
tion Management Services For Remodeling New City Hall
e] Award Bid for the Elevator for the New City Hall
*f] Approve Bills in the Amount of $119,699.32
*g] Request for Proposals for Audit Services
14] Resolutions and Ordinances:
*a] Res. No. 3631 - Accepting Work on the 1991 Pavement
Preservation - Sealcoating Project 1991-6
*b] Res. No. 3642 - Opposing H.R. Bill 5653, Which Would
Require Counties to Prepare Special
Property Tax Notices to Taxpayers
*c] Ord. No. 340 - Requiring All Boards & Commissions to
Follow Roberts Rules
TENTATIVE AGENDA
August 4, 1992
Page -2-
15] Other Business:
a]
b]
c]
d]
16] Adjourn to Tuesday, August 18, 1992 at 7:00 P.M.
Dennis R. Kraft
City Administrator
REMINDER: Budget Worksession - August 11, 1992 at 7:00 P.M. and
August 25, 1992 at 7:00 P.M.
& r, 1 4
r t
s
Y
. - .t'- 1983
f'r
""1#} ',71r: '}' -"- y ' - JulX 21. 1.01' 12
3. tither Oistora
4. Idiot
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OP THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Adj . Reg. Session Shakopee, Minnesota July 21, 1992
Chrmn. Sweeney called the meeting to order at 7: 10 p.m. , with Comm.
Lynch, Vierling, and Laurent present. Also present: City Admn. ,
Dennis Kraft; City Attorney, Karen Marty; Ass 't City Admn. , Barry
Stock; City Clerk, Judith S. Cox; City Planner, Lindberg Ekola; and
Public Works Director, Dave Hutton.
Lynch/Vierling moved to approve the July 7, 1992, meeting minutes.
Motion carried unanimously.
The Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority recessed its
meeting to follow the meeting of the Shakopee City Council for an
executive session to discuss property purchase offers for Outlot A,
Macey's Second Addition and for preliminary consideration of
allegations against personnel.
Chairman Sweeney re-convened the H.R.A. meeting at 10:30 P.M. and
stated that no action was taken during the Executive Session and
asked if there was anything to come before the H.R.A.
Chairman Sweeney recessed the meeting at 10:32 P.M.to return to
executive session for clarification on action to be taken by the
H.R.A.
Chairman Sweeney re-convened the H.R.A. meeting at 10:35 P.M. and
stated that no action was taken during the Executive Session.
The City Attorney announced that after discussion in Executive
Session it was determined that allegations were unfounded and that
no disciplinary action was warranted regarding the personnel
matter.
Beard/Laurent moved that the Executive Director be directed to
notify both parties, who have tendered offers for Outlot A, Macey
Second Addition, that the H.R.A. will entertain both offers on July
28, 1992 at 8:00 A.M. at City Hall to determine which offer to
accept. Motion carried unanimously.
Chairman Sweeney adjourned the meeting to July 28, 1992 at 8:00
A.M. The meeting concluded at 10:42 P.M.
Dennis R. Kraft
Executive Director
Jane VanMaldeghem and
Judith S. Cox
Recording Secretaries
8R Pt
eoR � � cT cD #
OPPICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Adj. Reg. Session Shakopee, Minnesota July 21, 1992
Chrmn. Sweeney called the meeting to order at 7: 10 p.m. , with Comm.
Lynch, Vierling, and Laurent present. Also present: City Admn. ,
Dennis Kraft; City Attorney, Karen Marty; Ass't City Admn. , Barry
Stock; City Clerk, Judith S. Cox; City Planner, Lindberg Ekola; and
Public Works Director, Dave Hutton.
Lynch/Vierling moved to approve the July 7, 1992, meeting minutes.
Motion carried unanimously.
The Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority recessed its
meeting to follow the meeting of the Shakopee City Council for an
executive session to discuss property purchase offers for Outlot A,
Macey's Second Addition and for preliminary consideration of
allegations against personnel.
aa2C Commissioner Beard arrived at 7:30 p.m. during the City Council
f meeting.
Chairman Sweeney re-convened the H.R.A. meeting at 10:30 P.M. and
stated that no action was taken during the Executive Session and
asked if there was anything to come before the H.R.A.
Chairman Sweeney recessed the meeting at 10: 32 P.M.to return to
executive session for clarification on action to be taken by the
H.R.A.
Chairman Sweeney re-convened the H.R.A. meeting at 10:35 P.M. and
stated that no action was taken during the Executive Session.
The City Attorney announced that after discussion in Executive
Session it was determined that allegations were unfounded and that
no disciplinary action was warranted regarding the personnel
matter.
Beard/Laurent moved that the Executive Director be directed to
notify both parties, who have tendered offers for Outlot A, Macey
Second Addition, that the H.R.A. will entertain both offers on July
28, 1992 at 8:00 A.M. at City Hall to determine which offer to
accept. Motion carried unanimously.
Chairman Sweeney adjourned the meeting to July 28, 1992 at 8:00
A.M. The meeting concluded at 10:42 P.M.
Dennis R. Kraft
Executive Director
Jane VanMaldeghem and
Judith S. Cox
Recording Secretaries
OPFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JULY 21, 1992
Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 7 :02 p.m. , with Cncl.
Vierling, Lynch, and Sweeney present. Absent: Cncl. Beard
(arriving at 7 :30 p.m. ) . Also present: Dennis Kraft, City Admn. ;
Karen Marty, City Attorney; Barry Stock, Ass't City Admn. ; Judith
S. Cox, City Clerk; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; and Dave Hutton,
Public Works Director.
Mayor Laurent read the City's Non-Discrimination Policy.
Sweeney/Vierling moved to approve the agenda with the following
additions: 16a) Communications from Rohr Malting Company; and 16b)
City Hall renovation plan procedure. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Council recessed its meeting at 7: 10 p.m. for the meeting
of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
The City Council reconvened its meeting at 7:12 p.m.
Councilmembers gave their liaison reports.
Mayor Laurent gave the Mayor's report.
Mayor Laurent asked for comments from anyone in the audience
wishing to speak on any item not on the agenda. There was no
response.
Vierling/Lynch moved to approve the consent business with the
following items being deleted from consent approval: 13e) Final
plat of Heritage Place 4th Addition; and 13g) Reenacting Sections
11. 03 and 11. 60 - Ordinance No. 338; and with 14b) VIP Interceptor
extension - Resolution No. 3632 added to consent approval. Motion
carried unanimously.
Vierling/Lynch moved to approve the meeting minutes of June 23 ,
1992 , June 30, 1992, and July 7, 1992. (Motion carried unanimously
under consent business. )
Vierling/Lynch moved to receive and file the correspondence from
Gene Martin, dated July 13 , 1992, regarding the hockey bubble.
(Motion carried unanimously under consent business. )
Vierling/Lynch moved to receive and file the correspondence from
Paul Egan, dated July 13, 1992, regarding layoffs at Canterbury
Downs. (Motion carried unanimously under consent business. )
Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing on the vacation of a
portion of the right-of-way along east 10th Avenue between County
Road 17 and 140 feet west of Merrifield Street.
The City Planner presented the report.
Official Proceedings of the July 21, 1992
Shakopee City Council Page -2-
Mayor Laurent asked for comments from the audience.
Jim Rein, 10th & Sibley, asked for clarification on the entire
vacation request.
Mayor Laurent responded by stating there would be no visual change,
but the property owners along this portion of the right-of-way will
have their property line moved closer to the street, which will
give them an additional 17 feet of property.
Mr. Rein stated he had no problem with the vacation request.
Cncl. Beard arrived at 7 : 30 p.m. , and took his chair at the Council
table.
Jeff Boldt, 971 Miller, questioned how this may affect his plans to
construct an addition to his garage.
The City Planner stated that this would allow him to build closer
to the curb.
Jim Rein questioned if a new abstract would have to be made up.
Mayor Laurent stated that when the abstract is updated, this
vacation will then be included on it.
Jim Rein questioned if this would mean additional taxes. There was
no response.
Mary Skok, 10th & Miller, stated she is in the process of selling
her home and would like to know how soon this additional 17 feet
would be included on the abstract.
The City Attorney stated that if the Council was to approve the
vacation tonight, the vacation would go into effect tomorrow (July
22, 1992) and then she should allow approximately one week for it
to be recorded with Scott County.
Mayor Laurent asked for additional comments. There were none.
Mayor Laurent closed the public hearing.
Sweeney/Vierling offered Resolution No. 3626, A Resolution Vacating
a Portion of the 100-foot 10th Avenue Right-of-Way Lying North of
a Line 33 feet from the Centerline, and South of a Line 33 feet
from the Centerline between County Road 17 and 153 . 32 feet East of
Miller Street, while Reserving Drainage and Utility Easements on
the Vacated Right-of-Way, and moved for its adoption. Motion
carried unanimously.
Official Proceedings of the July 21, 1992
Shakopee City Council Page -3-
Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing on the vacation of that
portion of the alley lying south of Norwest Bank. (Lots 6, 7 and 8,
Block 7, East Shakopee Plat)
The City Planner stated that the Planning Commission recommended
the vacation of a portion of this alley lying south of the Norwest
Bank, located at 738 East 1st Avenue (Lots 6, 7, and 8, Block 7,
East Shakopee Plat) subject to conditions. He added that a
subsequent meeting had taken place between staff and the applicant
and the Norwest representatives were now requesting the alley
undergo a closure instead of the vacation. The City Planner stated
that a closure is also preferred by staff and that is what is being
requested.
Mayor Laurent asked for comments from the audience.
Wally Johnson, project engineer for Norwest Bank commended the
staff on their cooperation and professionalism.
Mr. Johnson stated that their legal representatives had examined
the conditions recommended for approval of this closure and
concurred with the resolution set forth. Mr. Johnson asked that
the resolution be adopted.
Howard Gerholz, 714 East 1st Avenue, asked how this closure would
affect his egress and ingress to his garage.
The City Planner responded to his concerns stating that there
would be little change, except they cannot exit their property to
the east. He added that when entering their property, they can do
so either from the west or east.
Mayor Laurent asked for further comments from the audience. There
were none.
Mayor Laurent closed the public hearing.
Lynch/Sweeney offered Resolution No. 3627, A Resolution Approving
the Closure of the Eastern 132 feet of the Alley in Block 7, East
Shakopee Plat, and moved for its adoption. Motion carried
unanimously.
Cncl. Vierling excused herself from the Council table due to
potential conflict of interest on the following Council item.
Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing on the vacation of the
south 5 feet of the 15-foot utility and drainage easements along
the 11th Avenue trail, south of the 1000 block of Shawmut Street
(Lot 1, Block 2, and Lot 1, Block 3, Prairie Estates 2nd Addition. )
The City Planner presented the report.
Official Proceedings of the July 21, 1992
Shakopee City Council Page -4-
Mayor Laurent asked for comments from the audience. There was no
response.
Mayor Laurent closed the public hearing.
Beard/Sweeney offered Resolution No. 3628, A Resolution Vacating
the South 5 feet of the 15-foot wide Easement along the Northern
Lot Lines of Lot 1, Block 2, and Lot 1, Block 3 , Prairie Estates
2nd Addition, and moved for its adoption. Motion carried
unanimously with Cncl. Vierling absent.
Cncl. Vierling took her seat at the Council table.
Mayor Laurent stated that Laurent Builders is representing the
landowners of Maple Trails Estates. Mayor Laurent passed the gavel
to Vice Mayor Vierling and excused himself from the Council table
due to potential conflict of interest.
The City Planner gave the report. He stated that the Fire Chief
has signed off for approval of the preliminary plat.
Discussion was held on the short-term and long-ranged access to the
10-acres exception parcel.
Vice Mayor Vierling asked for any comments from the audience.
There were none.
Beard/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3620, A Resolution Approving the
Preliminary Plat of Maple Trails Estates, and moved for its
adoption. Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Laurent absent.
Mayor Laurent returned to the Council table. Vice Mayor Vierling
passed the gavel to Mayor Laurent.
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3621, A Resolution Approving
the Preliminary and Final Plat for Dalles Townhome Addition, and
moved for its adoption. (Motion carried unanimously under consent
business. )
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3622, A Resolution Amending
Resolution No. 3592, A Resolution Approving the Preliminary and
Final Planned Unit Development for High Five Erectors, Inc. , and
moved for its adoption. (Motion carried unanimously under consent
business. )
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3623, A Resolution of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Approving the Amendment to the Planned
Unit Development for Shakopee Towing and Storage, and moved for its
adoption. (Motion carried unanimously under consent business. )
Official Proceedings of the July 21, 1992
Shakopee City Council Page -5-
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3624, A Resolution of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Approving the Final Plat of Heritage
Place 4th Addition, and moved for its adoption. Motion carried
unanimously.
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3625, A Resolution Approving
the Final Plat for The Meadows 8th Addition, and moved its
adoption. (Motion carried unanimously under consent business. )
Cncl. Sweeney stated that by adopting Ordinance No. 338, this would
just be another patch work done to the City Code. He stated he
doesn't believe that reenacting Sections 11. 03 and 11. 60 is a
pressing matter and the usual procedure is to include information
to the Council on what language is being replaced.
The City Attorney stated that there were some ordinances that were
so poorly written that they could not be codified and to review the
entire zoning ordinance would take a lot of extra time that staff
currently does not have available. She added that the text is very
long and that is the reason this information was not given to the
Council. She stated she understands the need for a major re-write
of the Shakopee City Code but this ordinance would complete the
last large loop-hole in the code.
Cncl. Sweeney stated that part of the problem seems to be that the
City is trying to draft an ordinance city specific. He questioned
why the City was not using a model zoning ordinance.
The City Attorney stated she was not aware of a model zoning
ordinance.
Discussion was held on the concerns raised by Cncl. Sweeney and the
time it has been taking for staff to review and re-write the City
zoning ordinance.
The City Attorney stated that doing a zoning ordinance re-write in-
house, with no additional staff, could take three to five years,
plus the added time for public hearings.
The City Admn. stated that the time that was there for staff a year
ago, no longer exists. He suggested this issue be brought up for
review at the time of budget discussion.
Cncl. Sweeney stated that the only way to force a re-write is to
table the patch work until the re-write is complete; and if this
ordinance is so important, the time should have been spent on an
entire re-write. He stated it's a matter of priority and this
should be put on the top.
Discussion was held on the priority ranking of re-writing the
zoning ordinance.
Official Proceedings of the July 21, 1992
Shakopee City Council Page -6-
Beard/Lynch offered Ordinance No. 338, an Ordinance Amending
Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation (Zoning) , by Reenacting Provisions
Inadvertently Repealed with Ordinances 266 and 272, Fourth Series,
and the Identified Text Changes and/or Relocations, and moved for
its adoption. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Lynch offered Ordinance No. 339, Fourth Series, an
Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map to Rezone Lots 1 through 9, Block
25, Original Shakopee Plat, from Highway Business (B-1) to Central
Business (B-3) , and moved for its adoption. (Motion carried
unanimously under consent business. )
The Public Works Director stated that staff is requesting
authorization to expend funds from the Storm Sewer Utility Fund to
correct a drainage problem near Foothill Trail and Horizon Drive.
He added that the Council had tabled this item July 7, 1992, at the
request of one of the neighboring residents, Robert Lindstrom. He
stated that Mr. Lindstrom is requesting financial consideration of
the culvert he installed in 1987 to replace the existing ditch
along his property, which was performed at Mr. Lindstrom's expense.
The Public Works Director stated that in 1991 staff had been
notified by area residents that there was a serious drainage
problem in this area. He added that normally if a street does not
have curb and gutter, which Horizon Drive and Foothill Trail do
not, ditch sections are constructed along the right-of-way to
control runoff. He stated that it didn't appear there had been
adequate ditching.
The Public Works Director stated that it would cost about
$74, 638. 00 to correct this problem, which really needs to be
corrected.
The Public Works Director summarized the request by Mr. Lindstrom
for culvert reimbursement. He stated that Mr. Lindstrom built his
home in 1985 with a ditch in place; but due to Mr. Lindstrom's
desire to fill in the ditch and expand the use of his backyard, he
installed a culvert at his own expense. He added that Mr.
Lindstrom' s property is located north of 21st Avenue (Lot 3 , Block
5) and the project being proposed does not affect Mr. Lindstrom's
property. He stated that Mr. Lindstrom's work was not needed to
solve a drainage problem.
The Public Works Director stated that staff does not feel this
project can be assessed; but it is a funding option available, but
then this project would require a public hearing.
Robert Lindstrom, 2099 Foothill Trail, stated that on his side of
the property, the surveyor did not get anything correct. He gave
further information on what prompted him to install a culvert. He
stated it was a working ditch and that was why he needed a culvert,
Official Proceedings of the July 21, 1992
Shakopee City Council Page -7-
but the ditches in the area don't seem to be working since the
development of land south of his parcel. He stated he should not
have to pay for a culvert that is subsidizing others.
Mr. Lindstrom suggested allowing the neighboring residents to fill
in their ditches to extend their property and then install a
culvert closer to the road.
Dan Talcott, 2117 Foothill Trail, stated that the City had made the
property south of them build a berm and this berm had closed off
the ditch. He added that if there would not have been a berm built
on Lot 3 , Block 6, it would be flooded.
Mr. Talcott stated he has an existing ditch that is out of
easement, and has repeatedly notified the City about this. He
added that due to these problems, they should not have to be
assessed for any drainage improvement project. He added that the
ditch should have been placed in the easement in the first place.
Mr. Talcott stated his agreement with Mr. Lindstrom's request and
stated Mr. Lindstrom really did not have a choice. He stated that
he believes the reason these lots along the easterly side of
Foothill Trail have not been sold is because of the ditch. He
insisted the ditch be moved into the easement.
Mayor Laurent asked for further comments from the audience. There
were none.
The Public Works Director responded to the concerns raised and
discussion was held on extending this project to County Road 16.
Cncl. Sweeney questioned what would have happened if Mr. Lindstrom
had not constructed his culvert.
The Public Works Director stated there was an existing culvert
under 21st Street and if Mr. Lindstrom had not put in his culvert,
the project would still have been constructed as proposed.
The Public Works Director requested a legal interpretation on a
resident maintaining a right-of-way for a period of years, if that
property than did not become a part of the resident's property.
The City Attorney stated more facts would be needed to establish
commonlaw easement.
Cncl. Sweeney suggested the City hold a public hearing to determine
the amount of assessments and to determine if the project should be
extended to County Road 16. He added that continuing the ditch
seems to be unfair to some of the residents in the area. He stated
there should be some assessment for this project.
Official Proceedings of the July 21, 1992
Shakopee City Council Page -8-
Mr. Lindstrom again spoke in favor of a culvert and the filling in
of the ditch.
Sweeney/Vierling moved that staff prepare a feasibility study for
a complete storm sewer project extending from Heritage Drive to
County Road 16 and then set a date for a public hearing. Motion
carried unanimously.
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3632 , A Resolution Receiving
a Report and Calling a Hearing on an Improvement to the VIP
Interceptor from County Road 79 to the West Corporate Limits,
Project No. 1992-9 , and moved its adoption. (Motion carried
unanimously under consent business. )
Vierling/Lynch moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to
take the necessary steps to provide the Public Works Foreman with
a uniform allowance and health and life insurance contribution back
pay consistent with that being provided to the employees covered in
the Public Works Bargaining Unit. (Motion carried unanimously
under consent business. ) _
Vierling/Lynch moved to approve the bills in the amount of
$2, 032, 594 .47 (of which $1, 010, 443 .95 represents a transfer of
funds. ) (Motion carried unanimously under consent business. )
The Public Works Director stated that staff is requesting
authorization to retain a consultant to prepare a City-wide
Stormwater Management Plan. He stated that the entire stormwater
management/wetlands regulations are very complex that involve
different governmental agencies. The Public Works Director stated
that Shakopee belongs to four watershed organizations, and each of
these organizations has prepared their own stormwater management
plan. He added that these plans are difficult for staff to
understand and administer and makes it even more difficult to
explain to developers.
The Public Works Director stated that the project is estimated to
cost $100, 000. 00 and will take about 12 months to complete. He
added that staff is recommending utilizing the Storm Sewer Utility
Fund to fund this study.
Discussion was held on the dollar amount in the Storm Sewer Utility
Fund. - - -- - -
The Public Works Director stated the balance in the Sewer Utility
Fund is $1. 6 million. He added that a portion of this has been
earmarked for continuation of the Upper Valley Drainageway.
Vierling/Sweeney moved to authorize the appropriate City officials
to execute an agreement with Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates for
preparing a Comprehensive Stormwater Management/Wetlands Management
Official Proceedings of the July 21, 1992
Shakopee City Council Page -9-
Plan at a not-to-exceed cost of $100, 000.00. Motion carried
unanimously.
The City Clerk stated that at the July 7, 1992, City Council
meeting, the Council had nominated individuals to fill various
positions on City commissions and boards. She stated that James
Revere who had been nominated for a position on the Planning
Commission has indicated that he is not able to serve on a board or
commission at this time and has withdrawn his application.
The City Clerk stated that the Councilmembers have voted on their
nominations, and the results are as follows: four votes for Gayle
Madigan to complete an unexpired term, ending January 31, 1993 , on
the Shakopee Planning Commission and four votes for Clifford
Stafford to fill an unexpired term, ending January 31, 1995, on the
Energy & Transportation Committee.
[Planning Commission:
Gayle Madigan: Sweeney, Vierling, Beard and Mayor Laurent
Anne Tuttle: Lynch
Clifford Stafford: None
Energy & Transportation Committee:
Clifford Stafford: Sweeney, Vierling, Beard and Mayor Laurent
Gayle Madigan: Lynch]
Beard/Vierling offered Resolution No. 3631, A Resolution Appointing
Individuals to Various Boards and Commissions, and moved for its
adoption. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3630, A Resolution Setting
the Public Hearing Date to Consider the Vacation of a Portion of
Minnesota Street North of the Alley Located North of the Street,
and moved for its adoption. (Motion carried unanimously under
consent business. )
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3629, A Resolution Setting
the Public Hearing Date to Consider the Vacation of the Alley in
Block 10, East Shakopee Plat, and moved for its adoption. (Motion
carried unanimously under consent business. )
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3638, A Resolution
Authorizing Deliveryof a Deed to Extinguish an Easement, and moved
for its adoption. (Motion carried unanimously under consent
business. )
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3636, A Resolution Amending
Resolution No. 3496 Adopting the 1992 Budget, and moved for its
adoption. (Motion carried unanimously under consent business. )
Official Proceedings of the July 21, 1992
Shakopee City Council Page -10-
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3634, A Resolution of Special
Commendation to Donald Bisek, and moved for its adoption. (Motion
carried unanimously under consent business. )
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3635, A Resolution of Special
Commendation to Harold Pass, and moved for its adoption. (Motion
carried unanimously under consent business. )
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3633 , A Resolution Accepting
Bids on the 1992 Pavement Preservation Program, Project No. 1992-8 ,
and moved for its adoption. (Motion carried unanimously under
consent business. )
Vierling/Lynch moved to authorize the appropriate City staff to
increase the contract quantity by a maximum of 25 percent by adding
additional streets to the project as long as the total pavement
preservation budget does not exceed the $75,000.00 budgeted amount.
(Motion carried unanimously under consent business. )
Vierling/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3639, A Resolution Accepting
Bids on Apgar Street, 6th Avenue to 1st Avenue; 2nd Avenue between
Atwood Street and Pierce Street; and Pierce Street between 2nd
Avenue and 3rd Avenue, Project No. 1992-6, and moved for its
adoption. (Motion carried unanimously under consent business. )
Vierling/Lynch moved to approve a contingency in the amount of 10
percent for use by the City Engineer in authorizing change orders
on this project. (Motion carried unanimously under consent
business. )
The City Admn. reported on correspondence received from Rahr
Malting Co. , dated July 20, 1992, outlining various courses of
suggested actions relative to the construction of their own sewage
plant. The City Admn. stated due to a series of problems, they
cannot build their own sewage plant at this time. He added that
this sewage plant is needed for Rahr's new malthouse, currently in
construction.
The City Admn. stated that Rahr is requesting the City to construct
the force main. He added they are also asking that any Sewer
Access Charges collected because of the construction of the new
malthouse be based on observed flow increases rather than
theoretical flow from this malthouse. _
Sweeney/Lynch moved to authorize staff to conduct more detailed
studies and prepare the necessary documents relating to the issues
identified by Rahr Malting in their letter dated July 20, 1992.
(CC DOC /193) . Motion carried unanimously.
The City Admn. stated that certain staff decisions will have to be
authorized as the City Hall renovation project continues. He
Official Proceedings of the July 21, 1992
Shakopee City Council Page -11-
stated they are running into some unknowns where administrative
decisions are necessary.
The City Admn. stated that all these decisions that must be made
are to be made immediately, which makes City Council input
difficult.
Sweeney/Heard moved to direct staff to continue to make minor
adjustments to the City Hall renovation plan as is necessary.
Motion carried unanimously.
The City Council adjourned its meeting at 9:30 p.m.It
4111P "ilk
C ' .
J h S. Cox
Ci Clerk
Jane VanMaldeghem
Recording Secretary _ _.
4lo . a .
E
Kmart Corporation
International Headquarters
3100 West Big Beaver Road
Troy MI 4808 4-31 63
July 28, 1992
Honorable Gary Laurent
129 East 1st Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear Mayor Laurent:
This correspondence serves as written notice that the Shakopee Distribution
Center, 901 Canterbury Road, #83, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 will experience
a permanent reduction in the work force.
Relocation will be offered to all employees but if declined, terminations will
take place on October 16, 1992 for 61 employees and November 27, 1992 for 54
employees. Each employee will be provided with his/her written notice of termination.
Job titles and numbers are as follows:
October 16, 1992
General Warehouse Employees 56
Housekeeping Employees 4
Clerical Employees 1
61
November 27, 1992
General Warehouse Employees 53
Housekeeping Employees 1
54
Please be advised that bumping rights are non-existent. Should you desire additional
information, please contact John Spinks, Manager, Distribution Center Human
Resources, at #(313)643-1733.
Sincerely,
Richard
d L. Kalajian
RLK/le
cc: J. Spinks, KIH
Action Requested:
Receive and file correspondence from K-Mart dated July 28, 1992 regarding
work force reduction.
/3a .
P
0 . q��"S SHAKOPEE/PRIOR LAKE
2,`
1HOCKEY ASSOCIATION
u 1 '
P . 1i. July 29, 1992
�OCKIP ,
To the City of Shakopee and Shakopee City Council:
It has been four months since our organization last appeared before the Shakopee City Council
at which time we presented our case for the construction of a new indoor ice arena. In that time the
Shakopee Bubble suffered vandalism In April, a near weather-related collapse in May and in June heavy
winds brought the bubble crashing down once again. Also during this time there has been much
discussion surrounding our proposal, but little progress has been made.
We have been told time and again that we must wait and follow the process. ForgWe us please,
but we can no longer wait. We believe our organization has been extremelyntimes overin the he topic
rs. Theffact
permanent indoor Ice arena has been talked about and proposed yyea
is, the Bubble is dead. Our program will also be if a decision in favor of constructing a new facility is not
reached immediately.
We understand this is a difficult decision for the council. Many of you may be worried about
encountering negative criticism if a favorable vote is reached. The old saying-you can never please
everybody is certainly true. There will criticism no matter the outcome of the vote. If, however, the
project is sound and the community will benefit as a result, a favorable vote will always stand tall.
I have spoken with each councilmember indMdually. Not one councilperson could give me any
reason why a separate Ice facility could not operate as well as one in a community center concept.
We truly believe this is a WIN-WIN project. At$450,000 and no on-going maintenance costs the City of
Shakopee will never see a better deal. Chaska's new arena cost$1.5m and is a much smaller facility,
Lakeville's new arena proposal will cost$2.1m and Eden Prairie's second arena will cost$2.0m. It Is true
our proposal is only the first phase, however we are a resourceful and dedicated organization with plans
for future improvements. How can you lose?
Finally, we ask that you open your minds to our request and again not worry about what your
friends and neighbors might say. We fed with an open mind the proper decision becomes quite dear.
A project such as this which will greatly benefit our community's youth, promote off-season tourism,
improve our local economy, is self-sustaining and is financially economical can only render a favorable
vote. How can you lose?
This package includes our proposal as well as some materials which will provide for you a
glimpse of what the planned facility would look like. Please feel free to call me with any question prior to
the August 4th, 1992 meeting.
Sinrirely,
g./ ,-f i f •••, . - -1
David S. Kaufenberg /
Shakopee Valley Ice Arena i/
SPL Youth Hockey Asenriation
964 S. Clay Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
(H) 445-4358
(W) 829-6223
PROPOSAL FOR NEW SHAKOPEE
INDOOR ICE FACILITY
PROPOSAL
Shakopee Valley Ice Arena and Shakopee/Prior Lake Youth Hockey Association recommend that the
City of Shakopee approve at this time expenditures up to$450,000 for a new indoor ice faclfty. The
faclity would be constructed for the 1992-93 hockey season and under the following requirements and
agreements:
A. GENERAL FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
1. Located at current site of'Shakopee bubble'.
2. Pre-engineered, pre-fabricated wall system.
3. Behlen style convex roof system.
4. Building size of 120' wide x 250' long x 24' high.
5. Would attach to existing block building.
6. Wald include all appropriate lighting.
7. Would include appropriate fire protectIon system.
8. Would meet all AD.A requirements.
9. Will utilize all other existing equipment not mentioned above.
B. CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENTS
Shakopee Valley Ice Arena would sign a contract with the City of Shakopee agreeing to the following:
1. Shakopee Valley Ice Arena will donate to the City of Shakopee all existing refrigeration
equipment, Zamboni, hockey boards, scoreboard and other internal equipment, which at
replacement value is worth in excess of$300,000.
2. Shakopee Valley Ice Arena will be responsible for Pb!.on-going maintenance and operating
expenses with absolutely NO costs being incurred by the City of Shakopee.
3. If any profits are realized after each fiscal year-end, all such profits will go into a facility trust
fund to be used solely for future ice arena improvements.
4. The Shakopee Park and Recreation Department may, if they so choose, be involved in and
an approver of the annual Ice hours schedule.
5. The Shakopee Park and Recreation Department, Shakopee school district and any other city
organizations may use the ice arena facility during the off-season (May-August) free of any
rental costs. (Exceptions being, costs resulting from damage or excessive Utility costs.)
6. The Shakopee Valley Ice Arena commission will not ask the City of Shakopee for any
additional funds for a minimum period of 10 years after date of Initial contract. The only
possible exception to this may be some shared costs relating to common parking area
surfacing.
7. Shakopee Valley Ice Arena will provide to the City of Shakopee all annual financial results.
8. In return for operating this facility, the City of Shakopee and the Park and Recreation
Department will agree to wave the Shakopee youth recreational participation fees for the
Shakopee Youth Hockey program.
9. Shakopee Valley Ice Arena has an emergency equipment-maintenance and repair tout fund In
the amount of$60,000. The Valley Ice Arena commission agrees to keep this fund Intact for
It's original intended purpose only.
10.Should Shakopee Valley Hockey start up a new pull-tab operation, all funds received will be
donated to the arena facility improvement trust fund only. No pull-tab revenues will be used to
off-set youth program costs.
C. FUNDING OPTIONS
We are recommending that a new Indoor Ice arena be funded from one or more of the following
available city funds.
1. T.I.F. Trust Fund -Cash balance at 6/30/92$6.3M (does not Include 1992 interest).
Fund usage definition: Promote economic and recreational development and re-development.
2. Capital Improvement Fund -Cash balance at 6/30/92 S2.6M1 (does not include 1992 interest).
Fund usage definition: Allow for new construction, additions and improvements on any
public or recreational buildings. May also be used for larger city and public equipment
purchases.
3. General Fund - Excess fund balance at 12/31/91 $600K (current month balance not
available).
Fund usage definition: may be used for any lawful purpose.
New ice arena brings less maintenance,
lower utility costs, and the
first league championship in 23 years.
4
ie
;.• II _
III1lllII11ll1hI. 4 ' 4,E 1t £fp
Saint Mary's College of Minnesota sits nightmare for the school's maintenance All that changed on June 3rd, 1986 when
among the wooded hills and bluffs that staff. the dome was deflated for the last time.
overlook the Mississippi River. It sportsThis time it was on purpose. It was part
"Keeping that thing inflated was a con of theground breakingceremonyfor a
quiet vistas,wooded cross-country ski stant challenge," says Roger Connaughty,
trails and a proud hockey history. The Saint Mary's facilities manager."Whenever new, permanent ice arena.
Winona, Minnesota school has an enroll it snowed 2 inches,we'd have as many as The arena's design called for a two-phase
ment of just over 1260 students,yet its =_
hockey alumni include Olympic skaters, j " .
two NH L players and the former head \ �
coach of the Minnesota North Stars. 4
' � 1 1 I III I I I 1 I I I I -fi-1---1--1--1_1 1_
fir
But history is no assurance of winning. g
Until 1988,Saint Mary's hockey program
had gone 23 years without a league title. 011.
Talent,enthusiasm and good coaching
were challenged by a lack of facilities. ,i,
Literally a lack of facilities,for the
school was one of the last college pro- eight guys on top of the air dome shov- construction schedule. The first phase
grams not to have indoor ice at its dis- eling. Even took a snowblower up to 'involved building a 134-by-220-foot
posal. That ended in 1981 with the ar- move snow. And if the dome sprung a- "shell" over the existing rink and re-
rival of an air-supported hockey dome. little air leak,we'd have just an hour or 'frigeration equipment. This permanent
While the dome was an improvement for two to fix it or she'd deflate on us.What ""shell"has Wells load-bearing, pre-cast
the school's players and fans, it was a a mess!" concrete walls and an insulated Behlen
roof system.Temporary bleachers pro '' . .'
vide seating for about 500. The cost of -* '~
•
phase one was S650,000. Phase two of
lirconstruction,still in the planning stage, �`=''
will include a new rink,locker room,
public lobby and permanent seating for
850.
Connaughty comments, "The first phase - - i III
of construction got the school the bene-
fits of a new arena for less money up
front.When we get the funding, we can
add all the finishing touches."
At one time Saint Mary's had planned to
build a less expensive metal building, but j
building codes,aesthetics and potential
operating costs made insulated concrete
. 0 .
walls and the insulated metal Behlen roof
system a better solution. ���,_ 1
"I had never heard of Behlen before we isocyanurate for an R16 rating.Walls are care of any condensation."
started this structure," notes Connaughty. eight inches thick,two inches of which Besides lower operating costs, mainte
"Art Nichols, an ice arena consultant we is a sandwiched styrene for a total insu-
worked with, recommended it. It's a lation value of R18.3. Although ice is nance has also been greatly reduced.
nice system. You have a clean look in- now maintained onlyfrom October to "Now, one guy can run the arena and
side the building, a low maintenance roof April, the design allows for year-round ice making system," notes Connaughty.
outside, and your insulation inbetween." skating. "With that dome, we needed eight guys
on call whenever they forecast snow.'
Wayne Smith of W.Smith Architecture Saint Mary's new arena has had a big im The arena has had a good effect on local
and Engineering Service,Winona,was the pact on heating costs. "To heat the old
architect on the project. "The Behlen air dome we used 250 gallons of heating hockey interest. Both the youth league
roof worked out well.We had a tight oil a day,"says Connaughty. "For the and the high school teams play at Saint
Mary's. And how about the impact on
construction schedule to make and the last two years,we heated the new arena Saint Mary's hockey program?Well,may
Behlen people were very good to work just by the heat from the fluorescent
with. And from a design standpoint,for lights. That was a nice savings, but we be the 1988 league championship the
about the same cost as some other roof found that wasn't warm enough for our first in 23 years speaks for itself.
system,we got a more finished interior." Minnesota winters. So,we've added some For additional information,contact
gas unit heaters to make the building Behlen Mfg. Co., Box 569, Columbus,
The roof has two inches of sprayed poly- more comfortable for fans and to take NE 68602-0569 (402-564-3111).
t• ..........____. . _
414.
• l..y ;:"11_,,-45f440:..<*Jti?.ki► .+ . .!t^ 44111
1!..'
T
Braemer Arena,Edina,Minn.
— \ J_ .
IIIIIIiiw
•
f' - a
":...--.-....4_, ••=
= =- a= _.mowv ' -
A Mk
�.`., ms`s J r _ VII
-
111111111,
`' � \� ai
I-I ,
i
Ridge Arena, Braintree,Mass.
a k,
.
`
- -
r '
52'+
xr' 'xi
x y aR y
.ti
, _ s.;
F 'r
wi P. :
'.
Clear Span Behlen Systems,
economically designed for spectator and operator.
It's no wonder so many ice arenas are being designed Wall construction is uniquely Behlen. You won't find
with Behlen "stressed-skin" systems. Operators like any extra framework. All of the support strength is
the uninterrupted spaciousness, the ease of planning, formed into the corrugated steel wall panels. Color-
the economical extra space for seating, skaters' facili- coated wall panels are also available to add a finishing
ties and consessions. touch to your building.
The clear span capability of a Behlen system is not the Photos on the following pages show how well Behlen
only reason why Behlen construction is so perfectly wall panels can be combined with conventional build-
suited to rink design. You can include the advantages ing materials to achieve a variety of interesting archi-
of a roof system that incorporates a finished ceiling, tectural effects.Interior finishing can be completed to
condensation control and superior acoustics. meet a wide variety of requirements.
From a profit standpoint, you receive a substantially
reduced requirement for refrigeration and heating
equipment. Heating and air conditioning costs can be
cut as much as 30% because of the tight, bolted steel
construction and efficient insulation above the ceiling
chord.Savings add up fast and maintenance of the steel
building shell is next to nothing.
For the ice arena operator, there's the further benefit
of"zone"temperature control . . . a method of direct- • r l
ingair circulation to maintain ice qualityand, at the ' '' ',ti il, ``
same time, permit spectators to sitin "shirt sleeve °I'�� ` Es q ` fig --
comfort". ,•"..,-,,s,. ..It- g _ di s.
The Behlen Dubl-Pani is a flat-roof system that spans , {-mra
. ideal for large municipal ice en _` i' '�?.k,
up to 300 feet* i a g p arenas. ` ,G
Or select the Convex . . . an arched roof system that „.. g -. , - „.,..,,y%_..,.
—,,..,,..„,,.. ...,3Aof N .-4 ra = ti t' ?
will span a 200* foot area. ;-S •r_ F _ .6'.1 .-..t.”' _
r›,„1"..:,
`Depending upon load requirements.
2
The facility, at left, belongs to Bowling Green Univer-
sity,Bowling Green,Ohio.This complex features three
different ice surfaces. The main arena has an ice sur-
- face 200'by 85'and is equipped with 3,000 permanent
seats and room for a total of 7,000 seats(roof span of
the facility is 296 by 180 feet). There is a separate
figure skating studio 40 by 80 feet in size and a third
a -- ; facility—the curling area,where four regulation curling
.>>'
., • ice sheets have been installed. This is one of the most
....memo®r complete ice sports-recreation centers in the country.
s_,...
imiiiiimimm
—. __ momProgramming includes ice shows, hockey, figure skat-
ing, recreational skating, speed skating and curling.
MAI -�"`
-
d:: ,---
`- ---ms„,„ .r�_ i.9'
.z.
,2 ._ -- - — - ,.....00*--- ...4.4.
1> -
•
1 1 4.*!'. - .d
2111,$, " ` - .1x
-'' ' -- 7 . ,,. , --N, , _ : . I
4 - riiii
- w.w
j4ir.
N.
1
With Behlen, there is no wasted space. Furthermore, Because a Behlen arena can be so efficiently insulated,
interiors remain uncluttered and attractive. Photo it takes little refrigeration or heat to maintain a con-
above illustrates how loudspeakers,lighting and other dant temperature. Contributing factors are: high re-
equipment can be bolted directly to ceiling without flectivity of the steel shell;low"U"factor of insulation
need of special ties or hangers.Much mechanical equip- sprayed-on wall panels and poured over ceiling;elimina-
ment and electrical conduit is hidden from sight above tion of air movement through the exterior steel walls,
the ceiling chord. and the air space between roof and ceiling.
3
Ridge Arena, Braintree, Mass. shown on this page,
seats 1,800 on each side plus 1,100 in the balcony
for a total of 4,700. The entire heating system is
located above the 30'-high ceiling, between the Dubl- '~-~—____,.__
Pani roof system. Heat circulates over bleachers and
balcony to maintain a comfortable 65° at spectator p188:agsNa
level without affecting ice quality. ' -
-
Fluted steel wall panels,40'high,combine with mason- --� + I --4.,.
ry to give a clean,modern appearance to the outside of ----__=
the building. Overall size is 151' wide by 261' long. _ p
s
..- �'< 3 .
,_ •
".
r
I
iii
I li i i A
An inviting lobby annex creates a striking contrast to
the massiveness of the main arena. When entering the
—•--- _ arena, attention is immediately drawn to the wide,
4.. "
Assmimmi
clean, enclosed ceiling.
'r a Heat outlets extend at mid points from the ceiling to
circulate warm air over seating areas. This controlled
° air circulation explains how warmer"zone" tempera-
tures, of approximately 65°, were achieved without
A • affecting the ice surface. Excellence of the mercury
f vapor lighting is attributed to the high reflectivity
tr� '
offered by the ceiling panels.
�[ Ice making machinery in the new Ridge Arena is ade-
ll ,i f' quate for year-round operation. In case of power
failure,a 440 volt emergency generator can be immed-
�I`,'! iately brought into service. Heat is provided by three,
750,000 BTU,gas heaters,located above the ceiling.A
total of nine ventilating fans circulate and expel air.
4
Dubl-Pani and Convex roof-ceiling systems
can be built on either masonry or Behlen
walls and offer almost unlimited design ver- 1'—'''
satility. Buildings on this page demonstrate a
variety of wall materials that can be used.
•
' VIViki 1.01Or
iir sPIIIIIP". .
i OS°W -
,. d �.
so f� f
I --f�--.
f - `i
Asa .� =s_
"1114*114111141 .
k Even without acoustical treatment, Behlen
arenas display excellent acoustical proper-
ties.However,a spray coat of special sound-
absorbing material will later provide really
lb-iiiiiiii..._ exceptional sound control. The natural cor-
rugation of ceiling and wall panels increases
the total area for absorption and deflection
of sound waves.
_ ,._
IN : it.lailkip,......., .
VITICIIN:
pit h.
Si Or:
T3,
i' E I •9�,r • ate•`- "-
5
Dubl-Panl System
The Dubl-Pani roof is composed of two separate, con- aluminized.Both have long life,service-free advantages.
tinuous chords of steel panels,joined by a light-weight Exterior wall panels may also be specified with a
strut assembly. Strut and panel gauges vary in accor- factory-applied finish of durable "silicone polyester"
dance with load requirements,resulting in an efficient, in a wide variety of colors.
economical design. Depth of roof system varies with Rapid, simplified erection is an important feature of
span and load requirements. Upon completion, the the Behlen Roof System.Individual panels are factory
Dubl-Paul presents a highly finished appearance. The punched to match up with adjacent panels. The entire
bottom chord forms a clean, finished ceiling. Top roof system is completed in a one-step operation. Fast
chord forms a weathertight surface. erection means that interior finishing can start sooner,
Dubl-Panl units can be specified either galvanized or resulting in earlier occupancy.
-, � — j I
I 4 �.. 1
ge
i' ♦♦ • • ♦ ♦♦♦•♦•♦♦♦♦♦•♦ •••• ••••
/„;l:// I;; 1 \/ - •
I
/ i
f
SEATING =_ I RINK j — SEATING
BEHLEN "DUEL-PANE" SYSTEM
Behlen 3" corrugated panel, shown above, is a self- Condensation and fogging . . . the result of extreme
supporting, load-bearing member formed from heavy- temperature variations and high humidity have always
gauge steel. Bolted together, a series of panels form a created a serious problem in ice arenas.However, with
complete, monolithic, weathertight shell. a Behlen structure the ceiling is easily "washed" with
tempered air, it remains dry and free of condensation.
TYPICAL DUBL-PANL ROOF STYLES All roof and ceiling panels are 3"corrugation.
1....t.-.- • vaz\mstee:
> / ,
6'8 5/8" . .: 9'-8 5/8..
\ 3'-8 5/8" ,
1
Type A Type B 1 Type-C
Span Truss Depth Type Truss Span Truss Depth Type Truss Span Truss Depth Type Truss
42' 10" 84' 10" 126' 10"
— 48'-10" 90' 10" 132' 10"
54'-10" - 3'-8 5/8" A 96' 10" 138' 10" —
60'-10" 102' 10" 6'8 5/8" 8 144' 10" 9'-8 5/8" C
66' 10" 108' 10" 150' 10"
72'-10" 6'-8 5/8" B 114' 10" 156'156' 10"
78'-10" 120' 10"._ 162' 10"
NOTE: For additional spans and technical data consult factory.
6
Convex System
4
V11°P-
& ' ("401111144.'! ii.
Wiz, -�rs'r - '�_
I i
_ - �y� _ sir
i - "_{_ _
_ _ __
IiV
.„.
r ;;A _. ,
ww.tietz, 10,40N r ir I --
:....,--!-4-11,-;,-,-„,,, 24.4.,....:412' ......„;_, , -27 . . ' L.r f . '
I r , ,
--- . --- _ _ _ - . wr.:1--a-a arriitEl„,. .!..;......,, ,,,, s.,.. _
Applith
i
For spans up to 200' in width, the Convex offers the
advantage of surprisingly low-cost construction.In this 'v '' '''f"V V V V' 'VI,.
system,stressed-skin panels are load-carrying members —.v.��•�• ���������.�AP.'r_.��
that form both finished roof and ceiling. Savings are ( .1-- �-- - .-_- .---- .-_- I -
realized by arching the roof chord,allowing separation /
between the chords to be greatest in the center of the _
span, and thereby reducing panel gauge.A light-weight ---_ "- __
strut system is designed primarily to provide partial -- _ — __-
load stability. SEATING -_ RINK = SEATING
Span-load charts for present pre-engineered Convex AIR IS EASILY CIRCULATED IN CONVEX SYSTEM
roof spans are shown below.
-:
``
r1< 1111=1.6
,sl�E a ifiC ?4 i i;#ri;
TYPICAL DETAILS-30 lb./sq.ft.live load roof
Roof Panel
Roof Panel 3" Corr.
3"Corr.�I---` Overall Truss Overall Truss
Depth B Depth B
1 t t
Ceiling Panel] Type- 1 I Ceiling Panel Type- 2
3" Corr. 3"Corr. ,1
Span Radius Overall Truss Roof Ceiling Strut Eave Angle Span Radius Overall Truss Roof 'Ceiling Strut Eave Angle
A" Depth B Gauge Gauge System D A" Depth B Gauge Gauge System D
40'' 65. 3'4 13/16" 17"55'12" 131' 10'8 3/4" 18°10'27"
50" 5'-3" Type 22'37'13" 141' 210' 12'-5 1/4" 18 20 19`36'58"
60'' 85' 5'8 21/32" 22 22 1 20"40'02" 151' 14'3 1/2" Type 21 04'16"
70' 120' 5'5 5/8" 16"57'28" _ 161' 252' 13' 5 7/16" 16 18 2 18°37,46„
80' 7'-1 3/8" Type 2 19"28'16" 172' 15'49/16" 19°57'15"
90' 6'8 1/2" 16"20'05" 185' 14'-7 3/8" 17"39'16"
100' 160' 8'3 1/8" 20 22 Type 12'36"- 200' 305' 17' 1 5/16" 14 16 19°08'22"
110' 10'-0" 2 20"06'20" 'These spans are capable of 40/# Live Load without any modification.
120' 11' 11 1/8" 22"01'28" ''Radius represents curvature of outside roof panel.
7
Seating Capacities For
Behlen `Stressed-Skin" Systems
The information below illustrates how easily a Behlen aisle requirements have been made. These capacities
building can be increased in size to provide extra seat- will vary depending on local code requirements.Build-
ing for hundreds of spectators. Each of these examples ing lengths shown have been selected to provide the
were based upon seating running the length and width same number of rows at both ends of the arena, as
of the arena. Corners are not included.Allowances for on the sides. A rink area of 200' x 85' was used.
V
i it ' I
I h&
sa , ..-.--
.. ,. .: aillirjr
%A�
y.r
TITVVIV
Ii
[. 85'-0" Rink Width
97'-0"Two 6'Aisles
Building Size Seating(2 Sides) Seating(1 End) Building Size Seating(2 Sides) Seating(1 End)
110'wide x 220'long x 16' 720 162 160'wide x 270'long x 23' 3600 810
120'wide x 230'long x 16' 1200 270 170'wide x 280'long x 26' 4560 972
130'wide x 240'long x 16' 1920 432 180'wide x 290'long x 29' 5040 1134
140' wide x 250'long x 20' 2640 594 190'wide x 300'long x 30' 5280 1188
150' wide x 260'long x 21' 3120 702 — —
Remember, every part of a Behlen roof and wall sys- "Stressed Skin" system. For additional information
tem is either galvanized, aluminized or painted for a on costs of a Behlen system contact your nearest Beh-
long service-free life. When planning your next arena, len dealer, or write directly to Behlen Manufacturing
ask your architect to investigate the use of a Behlen Company.
I End)
11
X• Manufacturing Company
Columbus, Nebraska 68601
AD 1149/M
N A Wickes Company Litho in U.S.A.
"I -
C is j
Jtf:
I J �.
., -
j ,
7/ 71,
:
d- pJ • 1 1,...`-.. J'
rs:I't
.1. '1 J: t:t'%f.
•
;()
.I= '` J1,i �. _,J, 'ti
0 , 1 =i
ti%t ~f (
1
li
.4-741:4$5,;: :.•;•tY. .,
,)
Y., :..fir r Y t'F
The Butler-MacDonald 145,000 sq.ft. Office/Warehouse Distribution Center is located in Naperville, Illinois
Contractor: Turner Construction Co., Special Projects Division, Naperville, IL
Architect: Harris & Kwasek Architects, Inc., Palatine, IL
Owner: Prudential Development Group, Chicago, IL
Some investments really are
Rock Solid
Market Wise
FAB CDN®
Attractive,affordable precast prestressed concrete walls for durable,energy efficient construction.
Member
POI _
CERTIFICATION
noR - 6111 West Highway 13 • Savage,Minnesota 55378
PROGRAM J (612)890-4444•Toll Free(800)727-4444
Regional Offices•Chicago(312)773-4441.Detroit(313)349-1710.Kansas City(816)478-4440.Milwaukee(414)761-2323.Omaha(800)777-1105
PCI Plant Certified—Confirmed Capability to Produce Quality Precast/Prestressed Concrete Products
,
1 111 I li i•I „.,..:::,‘..4-..:...,
III I tf tir. �n i III 1 '� � 14 .. r..
r2 I I ;l• �i 4• '-
1 t11 1 '.� II ,
lis I l I'j ,'
�� I{ .'.
•
I -.f d-K
1 _. •t T.,. i
fit.
•
y+ <fi .,1,4 $ t ', ' { '‘'::':2441-
u l ;top
1 FJ� 1").r:112‘
�j ' tq •,.riFy �T
.. 6 .y / .i.e'::'":_
"J." - •-•
: F •,,4-.-1;‘
SL 1
Two Office Warehouse Distribution Centers located in West Chicago, Illinois
Building One — 1178'x247'occupied by Unisys Corporation • Building Two — 1178'x 212'occupied in part by AT&T
Owner: Blackhawk Center Limited Partnership Architect: Busche& Markson, Mt. Prospect, Illinois
Twelve acres enclosed on-time and on-budget
would be enough for some, but we believe
appearance is part of performance.
FAB CON
Attractive,affordable precast prestressed concrete walls for durable,energy efficient construction.
�il=ci 6111 West Highway 13 • Savage,Minnesota 55378 • (612)890-4444
'CERTIFICATION Out-of-State Toll Free(800)328-2970 • In Minnesota(800)352-2811
PROGRAM
0 Regional Offices • Chicago(312)773-4441 • Milwaukee(414)483-0790
V'IU Le y _reg ,e6,1,14-
V/i Y -L .. -Ge- SCliel)Ote "
OF
ffov,e5 TTL
kkei/AsED 110045
SPL. VO0-r-i4 b?O e KCC 530 53 )
SPS "Foam A- tv1 ENTS e!o 7 %
511A gag-6 141 Uf 5CftoOL /00 10 h
5HAKoP6-E P161J.5 LEAGttE 50 5 Vo
5i►RKoPEE/Lto, 5 DPEt5Kfrrime 30 3
SNAKoPEE 'PARK '1- Pec-- ao a °l
s4iQKoPEE latvAUN t1 / 5OB--i6L 796 s0 a/c.
LA-Ke L/ILLE Voofll /lOCK6-Y / DO /O
-"ie /IA/ Yet/7H f/ xe y / 00 /0 910
tLL5C. GR-00Ps 1/ ---
oT116.ke 508-Tf4L a0I/ 020
Ck�Wlo 10--L 4)'s / O00 Aoo c/c.
I /[�J
� L
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director Oi
SUBJECT: Traffic Signal at County Road 16 and
County Road 83
DATE: July 29, 1992
INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND:
Council Member Beard has requested that City staff make a request
to Scott County for a traffic signal warrant study at the
interesection of County Roads 16 and 83 .
Several years ago the City Council made a similar request to Scott
County and the results of that study were negative. Since that
study was completed, the amount of traffic on County Road 83 has
changed considerably due to the impacts of Mystic Lake Casino on
local traffic patterns.
Therefore, staff also feels that a more current warrant study
should be done.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Direct staff to request a traffic signal warrant study of this
intersection through Scott County.
2 . Deny the request.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Move to direct City staff to submit a formal request to Scott
County to complete a traffic signal warrant study for the
intersection of County Roads 16 and 83 and to report back to the
City Council once the results are known.
DH/pmp
SIGNAL
COI\ISEI\IT /3 c.
MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Temporary Beer License - Jaycees
DATE: July 30, 1992
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
The city has received an application from the Shakopee Jaycees
for a temporary 3 .2 beer license for August 8, 1992. The Jaycees
will be selling beer at Lions Park during Derby Days.
The application is in order.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve the application and grant a temporary On Sale Non-
Intoxicating Malt Liquor License to the Shakopee Jaycees, Lions
Park Southeast Shelter, for August 8, 1992 .
#/ 3 c.
',ONSET
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CT OUNCIL
FROM: Karen Marty, City Attorney/ /
DATE: July 31, 1992
RE: Contract with Bossardt Corporation
Attached is the contract negotiated with Bossardt Corporation
to provide the construction manager services for the new City Hall.
This provides for a maximum fixed fee of $36, 500. This project has
previously been approved, but we now need authorization for the
appropriate City officials to sign the contract.
ACTION REQUESTED: Move to authorize the appropriate City officials
to execute the contract with Bossardt Corporation to provide
construction manager services for the new City Hall .
[31K]
CONSULTANT CONTRACT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
August, 1992, by and between the City of Shakopee, a municipal
corporation of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as
the "City" with offices at 129 E. 1st Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota
55379, and Bossardt Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the
"Consultant" with offices at 7400 Metro Boulevard, Suite # 400,
Edina, MN 55439.
WITNESSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee desires to engage the
Consultant to render certain technical and professional services
hereafter described in connection with a project more
particularly described as the new Shakopee City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant made certain representations and
statements to the City with respect to the provision of such
services and the City has accepted said proposal.
NOW, THEREFORE, for the considerations herein expressed, it
is agreed by and between the City and the Consultant as follows:
1. Services. The City agrees to engage the services of
the Consultant and the Consultant agrees to perform the services
hereinafter set forth in connection with the project and
described in Exhibit A.
2 . Addition to Services. The City may add to the
Consultant services or delete therefrom activities of a similar
nature to those set forth in Exhibits A and B, provided that the
total cost of such work does not exceed the total cost allowance
as specified therein. The Consultant shall undertake such
changed activities only upon the direction of the City. All such
directives and changes shall be in written form and prepared and
approved by the office of the City Administrator and shall be
accepted and countersigned by the Consultant.
3 . Exchange of Data. All information, data, and reports as
are existing, available and necessary for the carrying out of the
work, shall be furnished to the Consultant without charge, and
the parties shall cooperate with each other in every way possible
in carrying out the scope of services.
4 . Personnel. The Consultant represents that the
Consultant will secure at the Consultant' s own expense, all
personnel required to perform the services called for under this
contract by the Consultant. Such personnel shall not be
employees of or have any contractual relationship with the City
except as employees of the Consultant. All of the services
required hereunder will be performed by the Consultant or under
the Consultant's direct supervision. None of the work or
services covered by this contract shall be subcontracted without
the written approval of the City.
5. Term. The services of the Consultant shall commence as
soon as practicable after the execution of this contract and
shall be undertaken and completed in such sequence as to assure
their expeditious completion in the light of the purposes of the
contract, but in any event, all of the services required
hereunder shall be completed as set forth in the schedule for the
project which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
6. Pay. The City agrees to pay the Consultant in
accordance with the terms set forth in Exhibit A, which shall
constitute complete compensation for all services to be rendered
under this contract. No change shall be made unless there is a
substantial and significant difference between the work
originally contemplated by this agreement and the work actually
required.
7. Termination. If, through any cause, the Consultant
shall fail to fulfill in timely and proper manner the
Consultant's obligations under this contract, or if the Con-
sultant shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, or
stipulations of this contract, the City shall thereupon have the
right to terminate this contract by giving written notice to the
Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date
thereof, at least five (5) days before the effective day of such
termination. City may without cause terminate this contract upon
30 days prior written notice. In such event, all finished or
unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps,
models, photographs, and reports or other materials prepared by
the Consultant under this contract shall, at the option of the
City, become its property, and the Consultant shall be entitled
to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory
work completed on such documents and other materials. Notwith-
standing the above, the Consultant shall not be relieved of
liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue
of any such breach of the contract by the Consultant.
8. Assignment. The Consultant shall not assign any
interest in this contract, and shall not transfer any interest in
the same, without prior written consent of the City thereto.
9 . Confidentiality. Any reports, data, or similar in-
formation given to or prepared or assembled by the Consultant
under this contract which the City requests to be kept as
confidential shall not be made available to any individual or
organization by the Consultant without prior written approval of
the City.
10. Interest. The Consultant covenants that it presently
has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or
2
indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the
performance of services to be performed under this contract. The
Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this
contract no person having such interest shall be employed.
11. Discrimination. The Consultant agrees in the per-
formance of this contract not to discriminate on the ground or
because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex,
disability, age, marital status, or status with regard to public
assistance, against any employee of the Consultant or applicant
for employment, and shall include a similar provision in all sub-
contracts let or awarded hereunder.
12 . Independent Contractor. The Consultant is an inde-
pendent contractor and nothing contained herein shall constitute
or designate the Consultant or any of the Consultant' s agents or
employees as agents or employees of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota.
13 . City Benefits. The Consultant shall not be entitled to
any of the benefits established for the employees of the City nor
be covered by the Worker' s Compensation Program of the City.
14 . Liability and Indemnity. The parties mutually agree to
the following:
a. In no event shall the City be liable to the Consultant
for special, indirect, or consequential damages, except those
caused by the City' s gross negligence or willful or wanton
misconduct arising out of or in any way connected with a breach
of this contract.
b. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the
City harmless from and against all claims, losses, and liabili-
ties arising out of personal injuries, including death, and
damage to property, which are caused by the Consultant arising
out of or in any way connected with this contract, including
professional errors and omissions. The Consultant further agrees
to defend, indemnify, and hold the City harmless from and against
any claims, losses and liabilities arising out of the award of
this contract to the Consultant.
c. The Consultant assumes full responsibility for relations
with the multiple prime contractors.
15. Notices. All notices required or permitted hereinunder
and required to be in writing may be given by first class mail
addressed to the City and the Consultant at the address shown
above. The date of delivery of any notice shall be the date
falling on the second full day after the day of its mailing.
3
16. Jurisdiction. This agreement and every question
arising hereunder shall be construed or determined according to
the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Executed the day and year first above written.
CONSULTANT CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
By By
Mayor
By
City Administrator
By
City Clerk
Prepared By:
Karen Marty
City Attorney
129 E. 1st Ave.
Shakopee, MN 55379
4
EXHIBIT A
The Consultant shall provide construction manager services
to the City as more fully described in Exhibit B attached hereto.
As a part of these services, the Consultant shall perform the
following:
1. Recommend hiring prime construction contractors as
needed. These contractors shall be Shakopee businesses or
residents whenever price and all other qualifications are equal .
2 . In hiring prime construction contractors, the Consultant
shall seek qualified bids, in a sufficient number to provide a
choice of bidders.
3 . The Consultant shall answer directly to Dennis Kraft,
City Administrator of the City of Shakopee. In the event a
conflict arises between the architect, Consultant, Intra Design,
or a prime contractor believes is appropriate, the City
Administrator shall have the controlling opinion. He may
delegate this authority as he chooses.
5
EXHIBIT B
1. Construction Services Compensation.
Compensation for construction management services shall be for
a fixed fee of 8% of construction costs based upon the estimated
project budget cost of $417 , 000 . However, in no event shall the
total amount of the fixed fee paid by the City exceed $36, 500 . The
amount of the fee shall become fixed at the completion of the
Design Phase once the project scope has been determined.
2 . Reimbursable Expenses.
Compensation for reimbursable expenses shall be in addition to
the fixed fee. A detailed budget of all reimbursable expenses will
be prepared by the construction manager for the City' s review and
approval prior to the start of construction.
Reimbursable expenses shall include on-site management costs,
on-site office costs and other miscellaneous costs including costs
of reproductions, postage, and other related fees.
3 . Payment Schedule.
The fixed fee of $36, 500 shall be paid in seven equal monthly
installment payments beginning in June 1992 . The seven month
period is based on an anticipated three-month pre-construction
phase and a four-month construction phase.
[31K]
6
MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
RE: Award Bid for the Elevator for the New City Hall
DATE: July 30, 1992
A representative from the Bossardt Corporation will be at the City
Council meeting on August 4th to be provide the Council with an
award bid recommendation for the elevator.
/ .iiI / /..-55a
BOSSARDT CORPORATION
Professional Construction Managers
August 4, 1992
City of Shakopee
129 First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
ATTENTION: Mr. Dennis Kraft
RE: SHAKOPEE CITY HALL
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONTRACT AWARD - BID PACKAGE #1
Dear Mr. Kraft:
Based on the bid results and results of our pre-award
conference with the apparent low bidder, we are making
recommendation for award of the following trade contract.
This recommendation was reviewed with the Architect as well.
We are pleased to report that very few irregularities were
found in the bids received, and the project remains on budget.
We have enclosed the bid results, with a copy of the proposal
from the contractor recommended for award.
A summary of our recommendation for award is as follows:
1. ELEVATOR - Minnesota Elevator, Inc.
Base Bid $ 37,832 . 00
Bond Cost 341. 00
Contract Sum $ 38, 173 . 00
Note that Minnesota Elevator's bid is for a voluntary
alternate Jackhole Hydraulic Elevator, which was not approved
by the architect within the seven day prior approval clause
contained in the specifications. We recommend that the City
waive this informality.
7400 Metro Boulevard • Suite#40(1 • Edina.MN 55439 • (612)831-5408 • Fax(612)831-1268
?rf..3.11
City of Shakopee
August 4 , 1992
Page 2
The City Council ' s approval of these bids at their August 4 ,
1992 meeting will allow the project to proceed on schedule.
Thank you, and please call with any questions.
Yours very truly,
C);/-- P-e-AA'CuL
Jim Perras
Senior Project Manager
JP:dg
Enclosures
CC: City Council w/enclosures
Tammy Eaglebull w/enclosures
Judy Cox
PROJECT: SHAKOPEE CITY HALL BID ANALYSIS SHEET
DATE: JULY 30, 1992
SECTION: ELEVATOR
1 I 2 3 4 5
APOLLO LAGERQUIST MINNESOTA MONTGOMERY
ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR
BASE BID $48,319 $46,856 $37,832 $44,890
LABOR ONLY INCL. INCL. INCL. I INCL.
MATERIAL ONLY INCL. INCL. INCL. INCL.
BOND COST $582 $59 $341 $57
TAX INCL. INCL. INCL. INCL.
BID BOND YES YES YES YES
ADDENDUM — #1 YES YES YES YES
TOTAL $48,901 $46,915 $38,173 $44,947
ALTERNATES
1/8/93 Completion
GENERAL
INCLUSIONS
GENERAL
EXCLUSIONS
NOTES Qualified bid Bid Minnesota brand Qualified bid with a
Problems with the equipment as a January 1993
specified schedule voluntary alternate completion
FORM CF PROPOSAL
Section: 00300-1
Date: 7/30/92
To: CITY OF SHAKOPEE
129 South Holmes Street
Shakopee, MN
Re: SHAKOPEE CITY HALL
The undersigned, having carefully examined the site and local conditions and the Contract Documents,
including Advertisement for Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Contract Forms, General Conditions,
Supplementary Conditions, Specifications and Drawings, and Addenda Nos. 1 , , as
prepared by the Architect, Scarman Krccs Pfister&Associates, Inc., hereby propose(s) to furnish labor,
material and equipment for Trade Contract Number 1 , as specified in Section 01010: Seat ion
14200 Hydraulic Elevator
and to perform such Work in accordance with the Contract Documents for the stipulated sum of:
Thirty seven thousand eight hundred thirty two Dollars ($ 37,832.OQ)
The lump sum cost to provide a Performance Bond and Payment Bond
is Three hundred forty one Collars ($ 341 .00 )
We understand the construction manager's function as described and realize that each trade contract is
directy with the owner.
We have reviewed the progress schedule requirements and hereby endorse them as they apply to the work
of this Trade Contract. Amendments to the progress schedule and reasons are as follows:
None Required
For changes in the work, the value cf which is determined by a method provided in Subparagraph 7.3.3 of
the General Conditions and Section 008CO, I agree that the Contract Sum shall be adjusted by the amount
of our direct cost for the work involved, plus 10 percent for overhead and profit, not to exceed the
percentages specified in Section 00800.
Above bid is contingent on owners acceptance of "Minnesota" brand equipment
in lieu of the specified Cemco Elevator, Inc.
FORM OF PROPOSAL
Section: 00300-2
M addenda shall become part of the bid and the Work. The Contractor shall insert the addenda numbers
in the space provided where indicated on the first page of the Proposal.
In submitting this Proposal, it is understood that I agree to: 1) Hold this Proposal, including alternates,
open for a period of not less than 30 days from the opening thereof 2) accept the provisions of the
Instructions to Bidders; 3) enter into and execute a Contract, if awarded, on the basis of this Proposal; 4)
to furnish Guarantee Bonds in accordance with Article 7 of the General Conditions; and 5) if awarded the
Contract, to complete the work in accord with the Contract Documents within the time stipulated in this
Proposal.
Firm Name MINNESOTA ELEVATOR. INC.
By: _
Chris Anderson - Estimator
(Typed Name and Title)
Official Address (Typed or Printed)
P.O. Box 443
Mankato, MN 56002
Telephone (507) 245-3060 -5
21.q,_7?7
1--)
Fax: (507) 245-3056
END OF SECTION
1.3c-
CONSENT
3cCONSENT
1992 is early in the year and there are no anticipated "budget
versus actual expenditure" problems at this point.
There are checks on the list for five firefighters to attend
conference/schools. The vouchers submitted are for five rooms but
do not include any mileage. Based on the travel authorization, it
appears that each of the firefighters planned to drive their
personal vehicle to St. Cloud.
r N * N * NN r NN r NJ * N * N * N * NJ r N * N r
* r * r * r r- * r I-- r ►.4 r r IF 1-. * t- * r * r * 1•- A CO
X. 1.- r 1-4 IF r r * r r r r * r * r * r r r * I-. * r X CO
* r * 0 * 00 * 00 r 0 * 0 * 0 * O * 0 * O * 0 m N
* 0 * CO * CO CO * CO CO * CO * 0) * VI * IJI * w * N * r A
r 0 * 00 * VI Vf * w C.) * V Jr I- r co * Cf) * r r CO * CI X C')
IH
Z -I
0 <
0
0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a "<1
V V V V V V V V V V V V V -4 Cn
�..., �.., � m Z
N NJ NN NN N N N N NJ NJ NJ D
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 7><
\ \ \\ \� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0
CO (0 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
NJ N NN NN N NJ N N NJ N N m
m
X.
3
C
z
NN C.)C.) I- r VI VI 1—r VV -4
W C.) NJ NJ co W P- V71-•C.) 03 00 CO C0 0)0) V V CO CO CO 00 1•••r
A A G7 C.) NJ CO N W VI V VI CJI VV A A I-.t-• VV VI LII WW
VV 00 wCDO) VCOV 00 00 00 CA Of NN CO Co VV
C)C.) 00 CO COV NJ V VI 00 VIN NN A A 00 VV CJI CJI
* * r * * * * * * * *
C) C) C)C) C)C) C) CO Co Co > m >
0Q rr mm 0 a D r
33 33 �< err- a m < 0 '' a
m N N C C M Z 70 ►4 M D H C
73 0 r r Z z C) z C) n1
A -*1 -ti 17 TO* C) A Co N 0 D Z
N 77.77 7:3 7:1
c 0 m Z 0
r -4 Z Z 0 0 - X - r 0 co~ cAn = 73
D Z w1-i-4 m m Z V 0 m C)
CO N Z z a V) 1-4 z m
I'CI 00 O C CO R• A A
O -0 C . 7C
O C -0 -1 D 0
0 -4 A pNp 001u) 0 N A 0
11
CO
-1
RI
a
(n Ai '013 -4-4 m N m 1-4
C m as mm00 Cl) N -1
77 Z 1-1 M r r 0 0 N V) MI v
"I -I Z Z m m 1-1 '71 IH m m T1 -v I
D Cn -i-I -v-o 13 D 13 D r
m R.C?.. 0 0 1 m I rn m m
mm DD N U)
3 "0v r-1 D D XtD C C Z z
-C CO CA -C -1 -1 -I H
--C
N
0
Z
0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D
I-• r 1-4 I-4 I-.1-4 r r r r r r r C)
I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 C)
A A AA AA A A A A A A A 0
NJ C.) C.)C.) C.)C.) N N N W C.) NJ N C
F. CO VI ut NJ NJ C.) r C.) CO CO r r 1
CO 0 0 0 I-r N VI N (A VI III 0 -4
I I i I I I I I I I I I 1
A r C.)CJ C.)C.) A A A 0) O) A CA 1
NJ CO NJ r NJ I•- NJ Ni N r r N 11' 0
V 1•- I-•N I-r r V CA A A V r •
I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1
A r W W W C.) A A A Cr) 0) A 0) r!
NJ 00 N I.-• NJ 1- NJ NJ N r r N r 1
I•- CO CO A r NJ C
NJ 0 00 CO NJ A r CI
Vt CO CJI Of r A 0) r IP O
0 A COr r W V A Co
VI 0 y I
I" A • 0
O r
I
Co
10: N
1
rn
N n
* * * * r r * r r r r U) 0
* * r * * * * * r * * D m
* * * r * * r * * * * G)
1 I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 m
C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C)
X X z X X X S X X X X
CO V) N CO N N V) V) N V) CI) 1--
I.
N * Al * N * N * NJ * N * NN * NJ * N * NN * N r
r * r * r * 1.• * r * r * r)-• * Ir * C. * -.I-• * r-. C) CO
F-• * /+ * F+ * r * - * 1-. * r r * N * r * 1--C-. * I.•. S CO
W * CJ * W * N * N * N * N N * I-• * 1.• * 1...I-. * r m N
N * (J * 0 * CO * V * Of * W W * CO * W * N N * C C)
W * ' V * Co * Co * VI * CJ * 0000
M
Z -4
0 <
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 >
V V V V V V V V V V V V V -4 (.
\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ m z
N.) N N N N N N N N N N NJ NJ D
CD CO CD CO CD CO CO CO (0 CD C0 CO CD X
\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ 0
CO CO CO CD CO CO CO CO CO CO CD CO (D
N N N N NJ N N NJ Al N NJ NJ NJ m
M
D
I
0
C
1-'1 AA WW (9(4 O)NA NI-.• -Z-C
CO Co C C.• 0000 W(.4 V V A A V O)0 0)0) VI Cfl NJ(0 N 0000
0 0 A A V V CO CO CO Co VI VI I-•A V 0)O) VI VI A CO O) h•Ir
NN 00 WW WW AA 0000 V1••0) CD CD COLD O)WN 00
Of 0) CO(D CO CO 00 00 I+C-• VI 0 VI NN 00 A0)00 A A
* * * * * N. * * * * *
I 1 1 00 m 3 z z H i D D a
0 z m 0 XI D CRN 1 m << 70
m zm 70 a 1 1 XI I-(1-1 r
to C) 1 N -< Xi < (71 al 00 0 m
-i D D N 7C 1-4 D Z Z
N O 0 _ 70 mm
0 C) 0 (i -Ni—Ni 73 0 m m 7-41 O
f- 0 S M -1--1 m 0 0 0 D 0
—I m z Z > NN C) _
-< In G) 00 x zz P1
0 0
N) D MH 00 .23 7C
D Z Z
I- C)0 70
RI m
• N 0
r-1
N
M
70
M C v 0 -u Cn -0v -I O 1(n m H
O 1 73 7o C xi Xi 73 C 0C A -I
C I-( 0 0 0 -0 0 0 D v (n v C m
►-1 C 3 -n v TI'Ti < 13 m y C-1 I
13 N 0 C) r m I- r -0
-4 -1 x In I-4 H to r C-I 1-I 0
1 1.1 1--1 0 m m m m m m 1 (n
D m 0 73 v) z a 96 (n (n D In
1-1 In Z m < << I-1 C)
Z (n 'Ti-I a
In Z
C -C M
CO
U) -I
N M
In 0
-I z
0 0 r O0 0 0 W0 0 0 00 0 D
I-. I-. A A H I-. r r r r r- I- C)
1 1 1 I I 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 C)
A A A N A A A A A A A A A 0
NJ W CJ W W N W W CO N W N N C
W V r 0 I. r 1....I-. W r CD 1••• W Z
NJ 0 CO NJ O O 00 O O VI N -4
1 I I 1 1 1 Cl 1 1 1 1 1
A Of f-•• 0 W W N A W Of 0)0) A Z
A N A 0 CJ r COC- (4 A 3-•t-• A 0
I-. co N 0 I- C.J tr r r r A C- r
1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1
A 0) 1••• 0 W W A A (4 Of 0)Co A M
A N A 0 (J r r I-• W A I-N A Z
C-• w CO 0) I-C r
VI CO A 0 V V A
W CO W (.11 VI VI Of 1* O
N V (4 0) 00 00 CO CO
0 00 CO 0 -0 I
w I-r w • 0
0 F-
ra
it N
I
-
(n D
* * * * * * * * * * ti 0
* * * * * * * * * * D m
* * * * * * * * * * 0
I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 m
C) C) C) 0 0 A C) C) C) A
Cl) N N Cl) V) Cl) N N Cl) N N
a N a N a N a N a N N N a NNNNN a N a NN N a r '
a r a r a r IF r * r r r a a r * 1-.M r a C') (0
* r * r * r a r a r r r a a r a rr r * X (O
a A * A * A * A * W W W a (.4(4 W W W * W a WW W a m N
* CO a V a W a W a (O (O (O a 00000 a CO a OM (fl a C)
* N a A a A a r * v O) UI a 00000 a W * 00 (D * 7 C)
M
Z -
0 <
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 00 0 D
-I V v v v V V vvvVV v rIV v -i U)
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ \ \\ \ m =
N N N N N N N NNNNN N NN N D
CO (D (D (O (0 (D CO (0(0(0(0(0 (0 WW (0 7;
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ \ \\ \ 0
(0 (0 (O (O 40 (O W (0(0(0(0(0 (O WW (0 -0
N N N N N N N NNNNN N NN N m
M
A
3
0
..4..4 r C
COOO rr rr rr WW 0)WWW(W NN rr -4
WW WW rr rr NN WW WW UIrrWNO) 0000 rr AA
Co 00 AA 400 rr OM AA VAI 00 x 00 V A V 0000 AP WW
rr AA 00 00 VV rr 0)O) VAO)VION OW AOW VV
AA UI UI (0(0 00 AA 0(0 ...I...1 000000 00 044.4 UI UI
a a a a a a a a a * *
7< a v - z z z zzzzz z 33 3
m
Z r > v > v -0 00000 C ZZ D
r m (n r >>>>> ZZ
XI H 70 11 77:77:M A mm <
< Z A A l i i m 00 m
Z (I) m C) A -T1-71-41-11-11
Z
00 Z
> 0 MI Or m —( 0
m m m m m C C >D D
M < > a' 00000 A 0
77777 < CC C)
C) 0 0 m A c)n m
0 x 0 -41-41 C)
C) Z CC 7
N ZZ
-I 00 70
m
0
1
N
-4m
M
0 0 0 p 0 C C 000)C)0 A CC m r
-4 -1 m N m 6-4 1-4 00000 0 m m 3 m
0 0 r m r '-4 H C)C)C)0C) 0 vv -~( 3
'-I IN '1 -4 =__== = rr 0
m -'t m m ,-( ►-I OOL)G)C) G) 00 0 M
C C N N m m « A U)
M m U) N MMAMA a Z A
r r -r1 l rI m'(i TI 00 0 70
00000 0 00 m 1-I
33 a V
MM -4
M H
Z 0
N Z
r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000000 Co 00 Co D
A r r r r r r AAAAA A rr r C)
1 1 I I I I 1 11111 1 1 I 1 (7
A A A A A A A NNNNN N PA A 0
N N N W N W W WWWWW W rr (O C
NJ N r (0 r -J V 00000 0 00 N Z
N N 0 UI 0 0 0 NNNNN N NN 0) -(
I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I 11 1
M (O 0) 0) W A A 00000 0 0)r 0 Z
A r r r r N N 00000 0 AW 0 0
W r r A W V v 00000 0 r N 0
1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1
I-' (0 0) 0) W A A 00000 0 0)r 0 I-I
A r r r r N N 00000 0 AW 0 Z
(0(0(0(0(0 W 0
A W A A W A NJ
Co N 00 V UI V (O ft 0
4:O-41.*(0W V r CO
-C11
• 0
0 1.-
CO
It N
X v
N A
* * a a a a a a a (I) 0
a a a a a a a * a A m
a a a a a a aa a G)
I I I I 1 I i i I m
C) C) C) C) C) C) 0 A A
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl) W
z,1
NNNN * N N r N * N * NN r NN * N * N * N * N r '
rrrr * I-- r * r * r * rr * rr * r * r * r * r C) CO
rrrr * r r r r•. * r * rl-- * rr * I- r I-. * r * r = CO
U1 N N Ut * CO N * 0 r U1 * U1 U1 * 00 * 0 * CJ1 * A * A m N
000o COM * A A * W * W * NN * NN * r r r-. * CO r CO C)
0000 * U1 A * V1 * W * ..4...4 r AA * CO * 0 r 0) * N X C)
I-'
Z -C
O -<
0
0000 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 D
V V V V V V V V VV VV V V V V -1 N
NNNN N N N N NN NN N N N N D
(0(0(0(0 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CD X
\\\\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ 0
(0(0(0 CO CO CO CO CO CO C0 CO CO CO CD CO 0 M
NNNN N N N NJ NN NN N NJ NJ N m
m
D
3
NN C
Z
F.. NJ NN Nrr COCO ►•I-• WW -4
01V10rV AA AA CO CO 1..r Co(fW VV Woo U1 V1 WW
V C.)CO V NII CO tO CO CO 00 UI Co.)N MOM VIN VV 0)0) AA
A r N N UIU1 NN CO CO 00 V(Dr CD VI•• VV 0)0) 00 NN
1-.00 UI WW i-.I-. (0 CD 00 1-.0N U10)CO UI UI NN U1U1 CO CO
* * r r * * * * r *
CCCC U) U) N W WO NN N 0 N 1
ZZZZ Z Z = > CC -1-4 -4 0 m
/-II-CIHM > m m XI -M WA C m W
--II-44-4--4 m > A m mm mm m -4 m
G)8� O
L� r -< DD 00 D D = m m
a�W� Z V Z CO 33 == Z 3 I-( Z
-4 mm mm CZ U0zzzz z oHMas ` Cn D 0rn , ,
NN CO Z
0 C)
-1-4 r X 00
>>>> I- R1 r AA a W =
rrrr CD 0 I1 m In m
A A I-+ C) C)
N N(,)N C) C) 3 3 Z X X
mmmrn
0 N
==== m m xi
<<<< m 0 0 m
0 0 .
M
N
-4m
WNU)U) Cl) CO N -i NN AN V M M -1 M
1-CCC C C C m CC AC MI m m m —1
O mm - m mA mm mm 0 I-+
-44O D m
ommm - m
rrI- r I- A m rr-,
-1-' -Irte- m -1 m m 3
Dmmrn m m m r mm im CO IN m I- rn
I-IU)NCn N CO R. 00 Cl) A W 2* N
-1 D N 0 < C < N W
-1 C C W C 1-4
Co II CO M
N "0 IN -4
I-I• CO IN
Cn ►-I 0
-A Cr) Z
0000 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 V r >
rrrr r r r r rr rr r r I- A C)
1 I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I C)
AAAA A A A A AA AA A A A A 0
NNNN N N N W NN CAN W W W W C
W F-I-h. r r r W r I- MM r UI r W Z
0000 0 0 0 0 00 1-.0 0 0 0 0 -4
1111 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1
WV)A A A W A r WW WW W A V r Z
5NAN A N N V mi.. 4I- N N r A 0
rrrr r r V Co WN Nr r co r NJ
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1
WMAA A W A r WW WW W A V r I4
5NAN A N N V rr rr N N r A Z
rWU70 r r
0000 N A
A000m 4/1 A = 0
0rr1-. r to W
W A 'V I
W • 0
O I—
I
ZR N
I
v
N A
* * r * * * * * * Cn 0
* r * * * * * * * A m
* * * * * * * * * 0)
I I I I I I I I rn
C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C)
X X X X X X X X X
0 0 0 0 Cl) 0 0 Cn 0 A
NN N NN N N N N N NN N N * N * N * N * N r
I--r r rr r r r r r rr r r * r * r * r * r C) CO
rr r rr r r r r r rr r r * r * r * r * r X co
00 00 co 00 00 00 00 co 00 CO Co 00 Co CO * 0) * 0) * 0) * (t m N
I-.r 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * W * 0 * 0 * CO C)
O 0 CO Co CO V CO VI A W NN r 0 * 0 * 0) * 0 * 0 7C C) .
r
Z —I
O <
0
-11
00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0
--4-.4 V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V O -4
V W
\\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ m 2
NN N NN N N N N N NN N N N N N NJ D
(O(0 CO CO CD CD CO (0 (0 (0 (0 co CO (0 (D (D CO CO 7C
\\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ . \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0
COW CO (D(O CO (0 (O CO (D (0 CO CO CO CO
(0 cO (0
NN N NN N N N N N NN N N N N N N m
MI
D
I
N N 0
VI C
W N W NJ AA rr (4(4 rr (0(O rr VI —I
V(D00 NN V(0-4 rr 00 rr NN rr N r O)0) 0)0) 0000 6,)W (4(4 0)A
(DOA CAO) NVIV WW rr VV AA rr O(11 UT 0)0) 00 VV 00 0000 0)00
WOW 00 VOV 0000 AA O)0) rr 0000 000 rr COW NN 00 VV N(0
VOV 00 WOW AA 00 0000 0000 WW 000 AA AA UIVI 00 WW NO)
*
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
3 3 DD r
Z 0 0 CO 33 > D f < O C
D r rr m D m D m D D r ao D v = Z
23= X 73 XI Z -< 73 z 73 A -f 0 N m I-(
XX m OG) 0 73I I 0 XX CO 1 r G) —4
mm < m r -i G) 0 <
II I rr 3 XI r m
CC C (n V) G) Z 0 3 Z DD 0 Z 3 Z < O Z
OG) -4 a 1 m rr 0 D C) 0 m 0
m m 2 D m 0 m C) rr C Z x m
D r 1
C m v) 0 D D C) Z
Z C) I 73 XI -I 0 D -4 C)
7C m r r 00 co m Z D 2
m 2 z z 3 0 r m
73 C) C) r m C)
0 Z Z
Z C) -( m
< m
O
r
M
a
0-4 co 0V m 0 co co co Zcn m co C C -i CO r
073 E 0= m C C m
Z D r ZD -II O 'a v D Zr 0 v i-1H D 0 m
T< 3 -+< C v m r 3 m v r r < O 3
M m N 0 1- r•- 73 r r r m
9,41- r 94,1- m 2 r r 0 Mr- N r -1 -•I r
m O m m
H N D020 o NH 0 0 N D N m m m P. 14 N
0 N 0 r m -•I 00 < N N Z 0
QC
2p0 O 2N (n Tt r MO N —4 73
OW Z ONC -43 O Z �Z CCo r
N -4
NM 'tl Nr '11 .'9-rt M M
N 0 0 0 -I 0 (n 0
--I -♦ 0 -I Z
00 O 00 O * O O O 00 O O O r O O D
rr r rr r A r r r rr r r r A r r 0
ii 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C)
AA W AA W N A A A WW A A A A A A O
W W VI W W 0) W N N N VI VI W N W W W N C
COW A COW VI 0 r r A WA r r V V W W Z
00 N 00 O N O O N VN O O O O O O r
1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 )
W W O WW O O O) r A 00 W r V r r A Z
NN O NN O O r N N 00 N V N A N N O -
rr O rr O O r r o0 00 r r r W r r •
1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1
WW O WW O O 0) r A 00 W r V r r A r
NN 0 NN 0 0 r N N 00 N V N A N N Z
<
W N r r •
W 0) VI 0
N 0 W A 0 0
N N W 0 Co
W 0) y I
(O • 0
0 t-
I
c0
* N
I
m
(n D
* * * )1 U) G)
* * * * > m
* * * * C)
1 1 I I m
C) C) C) A
N N V) co Vt
N N N NN N NN N NN N NN N N NN N N N N r
r r r rr r rr r rr r rr r r rr r r r r C) CO
r r r rr r rr r rr r rr r r rr r r r r = (O
00 CO CO 0000 00 WW Co Co 00 CO 0000 CO CO 0000 Co CO 00 00 m N
N N N NN N NN N NN r rr r r rr r r r r C)
V Co 0 AA W NN r 00 (O 0003 V Co 00 A W N r X C) .
M
Z -i
0 <
0
0 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 D
V V V VV V VV V VV V VV V V VV V V V V -1 (/)
\ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ m S
N N N NN N NN N NN N NN N N NN N N N N D
(0 CO (O WW (O 00 (0 00 (O 00 (O CO (D(O (D (O (D (D 75
\ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ 0
(O (O (O WW (G WW (O CO(D (O OW CO (0 00 CO CO CO (D
N N N NN N NN N NN N NN N N NN N N N N m
m
X^
3
0
rr 0000 C
Z
rr MO N r r W W WW VV WW rr rr -4
0) NN VV VAW WW 0)(D C) rr AVV 0)0) (0(00 0000 AA VITA NN 00 NN VV
0) 00 00 000 0000 0)VIr rr wrr VV VON 00 (OW 000 0)0) VV 00 00
V 00 00 000 0)0) NON 00 0)0000 0)O) 000 00 OO 000 00 VV 00 00
00 00 00 000 00 000 00 Nrr WW VIOLA NN 00 000 00 Mm 00 NN
* * * s * * * * * * * * * * * *
(/) u) 20 00 0 33 W 2070 20 00 Z 3 -11 -1 r X 1-1
rr C rr 00 S rr D MM rn MM 0 rr rr Dm C)
20 W m zz D XXZ mm z zZ D Z 33
A C 0 Z Z 20 mm -i 00 -.( mm D Z 0 0 m m
1r 000 r >>D0 2020 20 NN (D-- XIV rr < 33
3 m (/) <
m D 2070 << 0 OW DD Z > 020A X (</) 73 M Z
Z 0 NN 20 DD co rr NN N r MM 73NN > ZZ rn NN r NN DD C) 20 8 r<-( 0
20 Z -4-( z Z \\ D CO m 0 20 T m 0 m
D w 0 0 0 -( (n 00 C) rn m -1, rr C) A m C)
-r E E m rum m 20 Z << V) RI CO S
RI v m 20 < C) 0 < Z m
20 -1 << r m Z m 1 1-4 C)
D 0 = m z 7C
C 70 M 1-♦ m M M 20 C)
-4 S rr O n CO CZ) 1- 20
Z 1+ 0
C) CO r
N
-1
M
20
(0 0 0 0Z N (1-4 N OW Cl) 0-1 r CO Z N (/) C) C) m rr
C C -( MD m 020 £ CC C 020 Z r Om £ D 0 .O 1
T/ rn = D1 £ ZD rr -0-0 V ZD C/) 0 ZD ra - z C m
v CO m Nm m Tl< 3 -0v v l< C G) v) 3 r m rr 3
r20 I- 20 1 v
20
0 20 m rr ( A 0
1+ 2. Z N 9.c-- r rr rr rr e.1- D 3 MZ r D 20 0
m w r co m MM m Z D N 'Ti r 3 rn
N) Cl) 3 -11-1 m N f2^ Co OW N 169. C) r1 1-4-1 N N > N
C V X0 20 C) N C) m Z OX co m C) rr C)
W 20 -1M < 2N 0 2N 1 M-1 0 0 2 z 20
Cl) 0 OC Z QC Z Z C 0 1 rr
A < 20-4 20 OW OW 170 rr 0 y
20 ',1X 'n rN 20 rN -TI 20 'V r —I
I-I 01 0 Or m Nrr 730 -7 N 4-4
v Cl) 0 N V 0 0
1 20 1 -1 0 Z
0
0 0 w 00 V 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 D
r r r rr r rr r rr r rr r r rr r r r r C)
I I , 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C)
A A A WW W AA W AA A AA A A WW W A A A 0
N W N 00 C) cow 0 NN N WW W N 00 ()1 0 W N C
r (O r AW 0 (OW A rr r (OW Co W (DA A r CO W Z
0 r (O O(0 r 00 N 00 0 00 0 0 V0 N r 0 N 1
I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I
w r N 00 0 ww 0 0)A Co ww r Co 00 0 A r Co Z
r r CO 00 0 NN 0 NN A NN 0) N 00 0 r V r 0
w r (r 00 0 rr 0 00) r rr r N 00 0 r r r
I 1 ) 1 1
I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
W r A 00 0 WW 0 0)A Co Ww r 0) 00 0 A r 0) rr
r- r r 00 0 NN 0 NN A NN Co N 00 0 r V r Z
(r 1,-.1-. (,J
0 CO A.A. A
0) A A A r S 0
0 0 AA A Co
CO N -.4.4 co 0 I
• 0
0 r-
(o
* N
X
v
N D
N G)
> m
C)
rn
of
s N N N N NN NN r
s rrr r rr rr C) CO
s rrr r rr rr = CO
* 000000 W WW 00x0 m N
s W W W W NN NN C)
)r 1-1-r 0 WW 0000 7C C)
M
Z 1
O <
O
0 M
000 0 00 00 >
V V V V ..4-.J VV 1 N
\\\ \ \\ \\ m =
N N N N NN NN D
(0(0(0 (O (0(0 00 X
\\\ \ \\ \\ 0
000 (0 (0= (0(0 M
N N N N NN NN m
M
D
OA N
Uf N N 00(fl U1 1-.1.. C
00 a) r W(0 0)10 WW r r W N 1
N 00 A(0 W 00 V r r 1..I. 00(4 U1 00(0(0 0
M 00 (4. A(0 U1 Of U( 0000 .4.-..10 0)U1r a)
CO 00-.4.41-.0003 0000 NN 000 000 V
(O 000000A 0000 AA 000 WOW 00
s * s * *
Fl C 00 <<
1 CCC N 00 DD
O Tl'1 Tl T1 l'l 000 D 00 (-I-
-I CCCCCCC >>> -11
D ZZZZZZZ NNN D -4-4 -4-4 <
I- 0000000 0 xx m
MMM C --1--1 mm Z
000000 VW►+0 rr-I- D Sx MM 0
AW..... m m m -4 MRI 00 0
0C)0 M MM 73
-1-11111-4 11-1 C) NN C)
0000000 737373 N =
111111-i MMM rn
DDDDDDD C)OC) C)
rrrrrrr x
z
rn
G)
M
N
1
M
a
mC-uU)rI0 COMM rn AM 0-1 M
0-4>MCOXIm C=r 0 OM OM 1
ON-<E(ODZ =Mm- c ZO ZD rn
Pai- r*1r Zm C)ZO M -11-11 Ti< 3
►+OZ (7:1 S1 M m
1r MMD G) M 9,0 9.1- 0
-(t -I;1r R.rn 3 m rn
CM T1 73 > N= N!. CO
-1-4 Z M T1 MMX M A< C) C)
73,300 C MCM Z S SN 7,
CC N N <Cl'0 C37 1 1 0 00 0
11 '717773 r rN 1
0 C7 00 CO NN 0
-0 1 Z
0000 0 00 00 >
W r r r rr rr A
I i 1 1 I 1 i i C)
WAW A AA AA 0
WW1-. N WW WW C
WOW W Cor (0W Z
00.1 N 00 00 1
1 1 I I 1 1 1 1
OW0 a) WW WW Z
0(40 r NN NN 0
04-'0 r rr rr
1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1
OWO a) WW WW M
0(40 r NN NN Z
V
r
A 1* 0
CO CO
N - I
• 0
O r
CO
it N
M v
N D
* N G)
* D rn
s C,)
1 rn
0
CA -4
o 0 0 co co co co co co co 0 0 0 IOD Co CO CO OD
H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H Og
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
w co w \O \O \O \O \O\O\O w \n \n \O \D \O \O \O ►' -
\O \D \O N) N N) N N N N H H H N N N) N N) C+
0 0 0 w 1 —1 H CO N 0 0 H H \n ON w H N
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
�' -• -F" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H •F' O 0 0 0 0 n
N N H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 H H 0 0 0 0 0 n
H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O\ H H 0 0 0 0 0 c+
• ,-" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H -P-- -P- 0 0 0 0 0 0
IV N H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 H H 0 0 0 0 0 H
`<
OD 0 "xi 0 0 0 OD CO OD OD OD OD OD 0 0 0 OD CO Co Co co C'J
H H C H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H II
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
''d 0 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H n
P a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
'LI
H H ,°' n
H 'xi
'i 0
Lo
04 P• H H H
c+ W O F O 1 \O N
V
\O \O O\ O\a\\n O OD O\ OD \O N w 0
1 H H w ON W \O 1 O\- O\ 1-' O\ ON W H N W 0
N \n \n \n 0 ON H ON \n \O 1 1 0 ON \n ON H \n OD 0
W O O O N w \n -P' Co -P' w O •fi' I--, Co O 1 H
w 0 0 0 w 1 O\ N Co N N CO 0 0 0 0 0 w N)
g
c+
:' c
lk O •
-EA-
,CJI
= 0 :I. = 7d x1 :V 7d 7d 'U C] (7 7d 71 71 z1 �7C
1 \nHO (D (D cD (D (D 'i W W (D (D lD (D (D (W d\1 B O i dH3BM r• F. r• r• r• M r• r• r• r• F. F. r p�
W N O\ c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ ct c+ ct ct c+ y 'd
N 'd C7 U) 3 'TJ 'xi (D P P AC 0 "d U) 'xi Cn a
U) tri (D I-1 (D H H K (D t'i I-I 1-1
W \7t 1 !) 7d H) 1-3 a o 1-3 < tri tr1 P 0 H 0 a
W \n Co 0' a lD F. 9 ,n ,n H n a a CO
o P � r1• • O
(1) 0 (D H H
M
w w w w w w w www w w Co w Co w w w c) H
OD Co OD Co CO CO CO OD OD OD OD OD CO Co OD Co Co OD x
O\ ON ON 0\ O\ ON O\ O\ON ON O\ ON ON O\ ON ON O\ ON • N
x- .F-- -F- . Co w w w co w w w w c41 w w N
I.,-) N H 0 \D co 111 a\ \n 4 w N H 0 \O Oz
C-4 b3 3 'd = 'V 0 : = 3 01 'J a 3 <
O O 'V trj tzi 0 P O P- C7 C7(D H MO P n
rn to, Od rn a 's a O 't7 r W 0 '1
a a a U)0 0 .n < a c+P K O a s .0 P.
O to 0 O 9° cC 0 O OD 'i
(D r•• Il M < 0 OJ (n cn M
K Z 70 7C r• 3 () 7d x
P 0'< U) N• C] • H < (1)
CI) 0 x 11) 'O'1 H 0
x
(D 0 cc) w r• (D 0
'0 \), (D '0
(D CO H (D
(D 0 a (D
1
C)
H N) H
w 0 O 1 \O N 9
\O \O -F- O\ OD 0 OD O\ OD \O N w c+
1 H H Co ON Co NO 1 OD H O\ ON w H N w •
N \n \n \n 0 ON H ON N) 1 0 ON \n O\ H \n Oo
w 0 O O N w \n -J w O H W O 1 H
LA-) 0 0 0 w 1 ON N N co 0 0 0 0 0 Co N
44 13
CONSENT
TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Request for Proposals for Audit Services.
DATE: July 29, 1992
Introduction
Council has directed proposals be solicited for 1992 audit services.
Background
Attached is a draft of the request for proposal (RFP) for 1992 audit
services. The audit firm is hired by Council and responsible to Council. If
Council desires any changes be made to the draft they should so indicate to
staff.
One item that Council may wish to discuss is the level of auditing and the
opinion to rendered that Council wants. The recent audits have been of the
combined financial statements and the combing and individual fund statements have
been in relation to the combining. The effect is that the individual fund
statements are not audited in as much detail and the auditor spends less time,
uses less restrictive materiality criteria and takes less responsibility and
liability for the detail statements. This is kind of a technical issue and is
Council is satisfied with the past audits, it may want to continue with the
combined statement opinion.
The attached list of CPA firms is a suggested mailing list for the RFP. The
list is based on firms known to be active in local government auditing.
Council should discuss the process they wish to use in reviewing and ranking
the proposals after they are received. Possibilities are; Committee of the
Whole, Council committee, Council discussion, direction to staff on ranking
criteria, interviews, etc.
It is strongly recommended that Council look at the qualifications of the
firms first and the price last. Council is retaining professional services and
an analogy could be made of not selecting a personal doctor or medical specialist
on the basis of lowest price.
Alternatives
1. Accept draft RFP.
2. Modify draft RFP.
Recommendation
Discuss draft RFP and give staff direction on the RFP and the selection
process.
Action Requested
Discuss and give staff direction.
August 4 , 1992
TO: PROSPECTIVE AUDITING FIRMS
The City of Shakopee plans to hire a certified public accounting
firm for a minimum three year period (fiscal years (1992-1994) to
audit the City' s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Enclosed
is a Request for Professional Services that provides background
information concerning the City of Shakopee, performance
specifications for the audit, and explains the procedure for
submitting proposals.
Interested firms should submit proposals to Gregg M. Voxland,
Finance Director, City of Shakopee, 129 East First Avenue,
Shakopee, MN 55379 by , 1992 at 1: 00
p.m. Please send five (5) complete sets of your proposal .
Any inquiries concerning the Request for Professional Services or
technical questions regarding the City' s financial reporting should
be directed to Gregg M. Voxland, Finance Director at 445-3650.
Sincerely,
Gary L. Laurent
Mayor
REQUEST FOR AUDIT SERVICES
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
I. STATEMENT OF INTENT
The City of Shakopee intends to hire a Certified Public
Accounting firm for a minimum three year period (fiscal years
1992-1994) to audit the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report in accordance with the performance specifications
described herein. Further, the City plans to continue its
efforts to comply with Government Finance Officers Association
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial
Reporting program and expects that this standard will be
maintained in future years. The City has received the award
for the past ten years.
II. CITY OF SHAKOPEE - GENERAL INFORMATION
A. City Operations
1. Shakopee is a statutory city with a council-
administrator form of government.
2 . With 11, 739 residents, Shakopee is the among the
largest cities in Scott County and is the county seat.
3 . The City provides a full range of municipal services
consisting of Public Safety (Police and Fire) , Public
Works, Parks and Recreation. It also operates
four enterprise funds, sanitary sewer and storm
drainage utility funds and Shakopee Public Utilities
Commission manages the electric (distribution) and
water funds.
B. City Staff
1. The number of full time permanent employees by division
is as follows:
General Government 16
Operations & Maintenance 22
Public Safety 22
Utility (SPUC) 16
Total 76
2. The Finance Department consists of the following full
time permanent employees:
Finance Director
Senior Accounting Clerk
Accounting Clerk
C. Accounting System
1. Most revenue and expenditure transactions are accounted
for on a cash basis during the year. At year end,
adjustments are made to convert Governmental and Agency
funds to a modified accrual basis and to convert
Enterprise funds to a full accrual basis.
2 . Utility billing (storm drainage) transactions, general
ledger and account payable functions, fixed assets and
payroll are maintained on the LOGIS financial
management system, a joint powers agency formed to
provide municipal computer applications. Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission (SPUC) is independent and
operates the electric and water systems. It also bills
for sewer and refuse service for the city. SPUC has
its own audit performed.
3 . The estimated annual number of accounting transactions
are as follows:
3 , 540 Receipts
5, 200 Accounts Payable Checks
2 , 650 Payroll Checks
7 , 000 Utility Bills
4 . Shakopee has the following fund types with number of
each listed:
General 1
Special Revenue 6
Debt Service 16
Capital Projects 11
Enterprise (2 SPUC) 4
5. Our current fee for the audit of the City and the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority is $8, 300. The
Firefighters Relief Association is not included.
6. The City has eight tax increment districts and no
federal grants.
III. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
A. General Audit Requirements:
1. Financial and compliance audits of all funds and
account groups for fiscal year ended December 31, 1992
with extensions for 1993 and 1994 . City staff will
prepare the majority of the year end work papers and
draft copies of the financial statements, schedules and
tables for the report.
2 . The auditor will express a written opinion on the
combined financial statements, combining individual
funds and account group statements.
3 . The auditor will perform a financial and compliance
audit of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority as
part of the CAFR. The HRA is staffed by city staff,
the Commissioners are Council Members and its financial
activity is integrated with the city's. Housing
programs are handled by Scott County HRA.
4 . City staff will :
a. Balance all general ledgers.
b. Prepare a reconciliation of the bank account.
c. Bank confirmation forms to be provided and filled
in by the Auditors.
d. Prepare schedule of bonds payable.
e. Prepare an accounts receivable schedule.
f. Prepare schedule of taxes and special assessments
receivable by fund.
g. Prepare a schedule of all investments. The
schedule should list investments purchased and sold
during the current year, and investments on hand at
the end of the current year, including all interest
earned on investments during the year, as well as
interest earned but not collected as of the end of
the current year.
h. Interest earned on investments should be allocated
to City funds and the transfer should be made prior
to, or at, year-end.
i. Prepare a schedule of interfund due to/from which
tie into the general ledgers of the various funds.
j . Prepare a schedule of contracts payable by fund and
journalize year-end payables so that the general
ledgers will reflect the proper amounts.
k. Update fixed asset records and reconcile to general
ledger accounts.
1 . The minute book should be up to date at the
commencement of the auditors examination and copies
of finance related resolutions will be made
available.
m. Prepare working trial balances for all funds from
general ledgers.
n. Supply additional financial and statistical
information, not subject to the examination by the
auditor, but necessary to substantially conform to
the principles and standards of public financial
reporting prescribed by the GASB.
5. The audit examination shall result in financial
statements prepared in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles for local governments as
determined by the GASB, the AICPA Industry Audit Guide
for State and Local Governments. The audit shall also
meet the minimum audit procedures prescribed by the
Minnesota State Auditor pursuant to the provisions of
NSA Chapter Six, the Single Audit Act of 1984 and OMB
Circular A-128 .
B. Timetable
1. A joint planning meeting city staff and the auditor
will be held prior to November 30 of each year to
establish target dates and work schedules for
completion of the financial audit.
2 . The final audit report must be rendered no later than
May 15, or within four weeks following completion of
the City's work papers and account analysis.
C. Reports
1. The year end report must include:
- Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)
- Management Report or Letter
2 . The comprehensive Annual Financial Report format will
be based upon the guidelines established for the
Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA)
Certificate of Achievement Program.
3 . The City will be responsible for the typing and
printing of all financial reports.
4 . The CPA firm will meet with the Director of Finance for
the purpose of reviewing its audit findings and
recommendations prior to the issuance of the CAFR and
management report or letter.
5. The auditor shall observe the adequacy of the system of
internal control . If weaknesses are noted, appropriate
recommendations should first be reviewed with the
Finance Director and then included in a separate letter
to the Finance Director.
6. The CAFR and findings of the Management Report must be
presented to the City Council by the Auditor.
7 . The CPA firm must be available for unlimited telephone
consultation or related financial matters at no
additional charge.
IV. AUDIT FIRM REQUIREMENTS
A. The CPA firm must be a member of the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants and adhere to the AICPA
professional standards of audit practices and conduct.
B. The firm must have audited governmental units which are as
large and as complex as the City of Shakopee in the past
three years and must have the capability of assisting the
City in retaining its Certificate of Achievement for
Excellence in Financial Reporting from the GFOA.
V. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING PROPOSALS
A. Interested firms should submit, 1: 00 p.m. on XXXXXXXX x,
1992 , five (5) copies of their proposal to:
Gregg M. Voxland, Finance Director
City of Shakopee
129 E. First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
B. Proposals should include the following information:
1. A profile of the firm. Please state whether the firm
is national, regional or local and identify the office
which will perform the audit if different from the
office which prepares the proposal.
2 . A statement of understanding of the work, a description
of the audit approach, and an explanation of the audit
procedure that will be used and a commitment to perform
the work in the designated time period.
3 . A listing of the exceptions to the PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS.
4 . A listing of the personnel proposed to supervise and
perform the audit. This should include biographies,
including relevant municipal audit experience, of the
individuals who will be assigned to the engagement.
5. A listing of comparable Minnesota cities that your
firm, or personnel in your firm, have audited in the
past three years and the names of contact people in
each city.
6. A proposed fee schedule for each year in the three year
period, including a not-to-exceed amount for the 1992
fiscal year audit. The proposed fee schedule should
include proof reading and math checking of a typed copy
suitable for printing, the City types and copies the
final. An estimate of the total engagement hours by
staffing category and hourly rates should be provided.
7 . A listing of other finance related services that are
available from your firm.
Audit Firms
Abdo, Abdo & Eick
Bloomington
Boeckerman, Heinen & Mayer
Eden Prairie
Charles Bailly & Co.
Minnepolis
Deloitte & Touche
Minnepolis
Gary Lundeen Co
Plymouth
George M. Hansen Co
St. Louis Park
McGladrey & Pullen
Minnepolis
Jaspers, Streefland & Co
Shakopee
Pannell, Kerr & Forster
Minnepolis
KPMG Peat Marwick
Minnepolis
Malloy, Karnowski & Co
Minnepolis
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Ray Ruuska, Engineering Coordinator
SUBJECT: 1991 Pavement Preservation - Sealcoating
Project No. 1991-6
DATE: July 29, 1992
INTRODUCTION:
Council action is required for a resolution accepting work on the
1991 Pavement Preservation - Sealcoating Project No. 1991-6.
BACKGROUND:
All of the work for this project has been completed in accordance
with the contract documents.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer Resolution No. 3631, A Resolution Accepting Work on the 1991
Pavement Preservation - Sealcoating Project No. 1991-6 and move its
adoption.
RR/pmp
MEM3631
RESOLUTION NO. 3631
A Resolution Accepting Work On The
1991 Pavement Preservation Program - Sealcoating
Project No. 1991-6
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City
of Shakopee on September 20, 1991, Bergman Companies, Inc. , 6615
Truax Blvd. , P.O. Box 659 , Eau Claire, WI 54702 has satisfactorily
completed the 1991 Pavement Preservation Program- Sealcoating, in
accordance with such contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA that the work completed under said contract
is hereby accepted and approved.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
, 19 .
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
I LI b
ONSENT
MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
RE: Resolution No. 3642 , A Resolution Opposing H.R. Bill
5653 , Which Would Require Counties to Prepare Special
Property Tax Notices to Taxpayers
DATE: July 27, 1992
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is correspondence from the Acting Scott County
Administrator regarding a National Association of Counties (NACo)
Legislative Alert urging them to oppose H.R. 5653 which would
impose another unfunded federal mandate requiring counties to
prepare and send special property tax notice to taxpayers and the
Internal Revenue Service.
BACKGROUND:
The County would need to differentiate between charges on a tax
bill that are a tax (deductible) or a fee (not deductible) for each
taxpayer. IRS rulings have made the test of what is deductible
difficult to apply. The bill provides no funding for additional
cost to prepare/distribute these special property tax notices,
which will impose additional costs on counties, school districts
and cities.
This bill was scheduled to be discussed on the House floor on July
27, 1992 . The Scott County Board of Commissioners will be taking
action on a resolution opposing the H.R. Bill at their meeting
scheduled for August 4th.
ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Offer Resolution No. 3642 , A Resolution Opposing H.R. Bill
5653 , Which Would Require Counties to Prepare Special Property
Tax Notice to Taxpayers and move its adoption.
2 . Direct the City Administrator to forward the position of the
City Council to the Minnesota Congressional delegates and such
other offices as may be deemed appropriate.
RESOLUTION NO. 3642
A RESOLUTION OPPOSING H.R. BILL 5653 ,
WHICH WOULD REQUIRE COUNTIES TO PREPARE
SPECIAL PROPERTY TAX NOTICES TO TAXPAYERS
WHEREAS, the United States House of Representatives Bill H.R.
5653 has been introduced that would require counties to prepare and
send special property tax notices to taxpayers and the I.R.S. ; and
WHEREAS, the required notices would have to state which
property taxes are deductible under federal income tax rules; and
WHEREAS, the bill would require county and other local tax
collectors to make a determination whether a change on a tax bill
is a tax or a fee, the test of what is deductible being difficult
to apply under recent I .R. S . rulings; and
WHEREAS, the required reporting mandate, unfunded from federal
sources, will require the County to use real estate taxes as the
source of revenue for payment of additional costs incurred in
preparing and sending these special tax notices, a source deemed to
be an inappropriate source of funding for this type of expenditure.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the City Council does hereby oppose
H.R. 5653 , and urge that such bill not be passed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Administrator is hereby
directed to forward the position of the City Council to the
Minnesota Congressional delegates and such other offices as may be
deemed appropriate.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 4th day of August, 1992 .
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
IWO". SCOTT COUNTY
OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR
COURTHOUSE 110
428 S. HOLMES ST.
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1382 (612)496-8100
CLIFFORD G. McCANN
Acting County Administrator
BARBARA NESS
Acting Deputy Administrator
JAN MURPHY
Administrative Assistant
July 24, 1992
Mr. Dennis Kraft
Shakopee City Administrator
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Mr. a t:
I am enclosing a copy of a National Association of Counties (NACo)
Legislative Alert. The gist of the alert is that Congress is considering
imposing an unfunded federal mandate which would require special property
tax notices to be sent to taxpayers and the Internal Revenue Service. The
notices would have to state which taxes are deductible for federal income
tax purposes. I call your attention to the last paragraph which states in
pertinent part:
"It is important that your Member of Congress understands the
administrative problems and additional costs that this bill will
impose on counties, school districts and cities. The bill should be
defeated."
Please consider taking this matter to your governing body for discussion
in the near future. I expect the Scott County Board of Commissioners will
discuss the matter at its July 28, 1992 meeting.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Very truly yours,
` 1
Cli -.'•.rd G. McCann
Ac/1/
County Administrator
CGM:jm
Enclosure
c: County Board of Commissioners
An Equal Opportunity'Affirmative Action Employer
NACo NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
440 First Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001
AlertTel. 2021393-6226
FAX 202/393-2630
5�aff�onl;a�. �t.slph.Ta�or�.-�Ia H� ` `: % < ,•x�.��;."�, ��T�..:h
ACTION NEEDED
Contact your Representatives and urge them to oppose H.R. 5653 which would impose
another unfunded federal mandate requiring counties to prepare and send special property
tax notices to taxpayers. The notices would have to state which taxes are deductible under
federal income tax rules. Immediate action is needed since the bill is now scheduled to be on
the House floor on Monday,July 27.
The House Ways and Means Committee is scheduled today to approve a number of individual Member's
bills which provide relief to particular individuals or industries. The bills will be sent to the floor and will
be voted on separately under suspension of the rules. This means that each bill needs a two-thirds vote to
pass.
H.R. 5653, introduced by Rep. William Coyne (D-PA), would exempt high-speed, intercity railway
bonds from state bond volume caps. To pay for this provision (estimated to cost $150 million in federal
revenues over five years), the bill would require counties to report to taxpayers and the IRS the amount of
property tax paid that is deductible for federal income tax purposes. The requirement applies to all local
taxing authorities and would be effective January 1, 1994.
The bill would require county and other local tax collectors to make a determination whether a charge
on a tax bill is a tax or a fee. The test of what is deductible is difficult to apply. For example, IRS rulings
include:
• Where part of an amount paid to a county water district covered maintenance charges and bond tax (but
the amount could not be determined), the entire amount of the deduction was disallowed.
• A deduction was allowed for an assessment where the proceeds were used to repair and resurface streets,
but not lengthen or widen them.
• A taxpayer's one-time"tap fee"paid for the hook-up to the city's sewer system was characterized a special
assessment for an improvement benefiting the taxpayer's business properties. Hence, it was held to be
a non-deductible capital improvement.
• A sprinkling tax for watering lawns was held to be deductible.
• Real estate transfer"taxes" imposed by a city on its homeowners for the maintenance of its police and
fire decal�nents are deemed to be taxes.
• "Service charges" imposed by a city on its homeowners for the maintenance of its police and fire
departments are deemed to be taxes.
• Local licensing fees paid by associations,businesses,trades and professions have been deemed revenue
measures, and are deductible as a tax.
Obviously,other circumstances would require ad he&determinations by the IRS,creating considerable
administrative burdens as well as great uncertainty.
The bill also requires that a copy of the notice to the taxpayers be sent to the IRS. However, without a
social security number for each taxpayer,the information would be useless to the IRS. There has been some
discussion of dropping this provision and instead require the tax payer to enclose their property tax notice
with their federal income tax return.
It is clear that little thought and research has been given to this legislation. It needs a lot more
study. It is important that your Member of Congress understands the administrative problems and
additional costs that this bill will impose on counties,school districts and cities. The bill should be
defeated.
*-14C-
C 0 Ne bi-11\1
EXPLANATION TO ORDINANCE 340
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: Law Department
PURPOSE: To require all Boards and Commissions to adopt
Roberts' Rules of Order.
REMARKS: Procedures followed by the various city Boards
and Commissions vary somewhat, and have been quite informal .
This has resulted in inadequate minutes, whereby we cannot
determine who made a motion, who seconded, and whether members
voted upon the motion. Two boards, the Community Development
Commission and the Park and Recreation Advisory Board, were
required to adopt Roberts' Rules. That language has been made
general to apply to all city boards and commissions, and
deleted form the specific provisions for those two boards.
ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Ordinance No. 340 , an ordinance
amending City Code Chapter 2 , Administration and General
Government, by adopting one new section relating to procedures,
and repealing Sec. 2 . 55, Subd. 3 and Sec. 2 . 57, Subd. 3 ,
relating to the same subject, and move its adoption.
Submitted by:
City Attorney
/
C
[2 . 51]
ORDINANCE NO. 340 , FOURTH SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY
CODE CHAPTER 2, ADMINISTRATION AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT, BY
ADOPTING ONE NEW SECTION RELATING TO PROCEDURES, AND REPEALING
SEC. 2 . 55, SUBD. 3 AND SEC. 2 .57, SUBD. 3 , RELATING TO THE SAME
SUBJECT.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1 - City Code Chapter 2 , Administration and
General Government, is hereby amended by adopting one new
section relating to procedures, which shall read as follows:
SEC. 2 . 51. Procedures. All Boards and Commissions shall adopt
Robert's Rules of Order and shall adopt such other and further
rules for their own proceedings as they shall, from time to
time, deem expedient.
Section 2 - City Code Chapter 2 , Administration and
General Government, is hereby amended by repealing Subd. 3 ,
Proceedings, of Sec. 2 . 55, Community Development Commission,
and by repealing Subd. 3 , Proceedings, of Sec. 2 .57, Park and
Recreation Advisory Board.
Section 3 - General Provisions. City Code Chapter 1,
General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire
City Code Including Penalty For Violation, and Section 2 . 99,
Violation a Misdemeanor, are hereby adopted in their entirety
by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 4 - Effective Date. This ordinance becomes
effective from and after its passage and publication.
Passed in session of the City Council
of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
, 1992 .
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
Attest: City Cle k
Approved as to form: A ;1 City Attorney
Published in the Shakopee Valley News orftheday of
, 1992 . Lv
[2 . 51]