No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/02/1992 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items DATE: May 29 , 1992 1. Attached is a memorandum from the Public Works Director regarding Summer/Engineering Inspectors. 2 . Attached is the Business Update From City Hall. 3 . Attached is the June calendar of Upcoming Meetings. 4 . Attached are the May 20, 1992 unapproved minutes of the Energy and Transportation Committee meeting. 5. Attached are the June 4 , 1992 agendas for the Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment and Appeals. 6. Attached is the Police Newsletter for Council review. 7 . Attached are the May 20, 1992 unapproved minutes of the Community Development Commission. 8 . Reminder for Boards and Commissions Picnic - July 8th. MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Summer/Engineering Inspectors DATE: May 27 , 1992 NON-AGENDA INFORMATIONAL ITEM FOR COUNCIL Due to the increased level of development in Shakopee, the City Council authorized the Engineering Department to advertise and hire one additional summer inspector, in addition to the one budgeted summer inspector. Staff has interviewed and selected Mr. John E. Carson for this position. The summer inspector that had worked last year had previously informed staff he would be returning this summer, recently informed staff that he had taken another job and would not be returning. Staff then reviewed the eight applications that had been received for the additional inspector in an effort to find a second candidate. Of the eight total applications received, only three of them had sufficient background and experience to be considered. One, Mr. Carson, was hired and the other two have since declined to be interviewed or considered for the job. Therefore, it appears that the Engineering Department will only have the one summer inspector as budgeted, rather than the two as requested. Staff feels that it is too late in the year to re- advertise for the second position and we do not feel it will produce any better results than the first advertisement. DH/pmp BUSINESS UPDATE FROM CITY HALL Vol. 6 No. 6 Dear Chamber Member: May 1, 1992 Administration funds that would provide for the inclusion of approximately 10 - 20 questions on the upcoming Update on New City Hall - The Marquette Bank is Municipal Facility Survey. The intent of the to relocate to their new facility located on 4th and Commission is to solicit input from Shakopee Marschall the third weekend in June and residents regarding their vision for the property in remodeling of existing facility at 129S. Holmes will question and the downtown area in general. start soon thereafter. The City Council has authorized hiring of a Construction Manager for Last week the Municipal Facility Subcommittee the project. The Construction Manager process that has been created to develop the survey will ensure that local trades people will be allowed questionnaire format held their first meeting. to bid on various project contracts. It is Staff is optimistic that only one more meeting will anticipated that the remodeling will be completed be necessary before the subcommittee will make and the building will be occupied by the City Hall a recommendation to City Council on the final late fall. With the remodeling completed, the questionnaire format. We are optimistic that the facility will be totally handicapped accessible on all survey will be implemented in early July with a three levels. final report to be submitted to City Council in late July or early August. City Clerk Park and Recreation Due to recent resignations, the City Council is The Park and Recreation Advisory Board is accepting applications to fill vacancies on the currently updating the 5 Year Parks Capital following Boards and Commissions: Planning Improvement Program for the years 1993-97. The Commission , Corn m unity Development new five year program is officially adopted at the Commission, and Energy and Transportation end of the year. The Advisory Board is also Committee. Anyone interested in learning about recommending that the City consider hiring a the responsibilities of these committees or desiring consultant to do a complete analysis of the an application is invited to call City Hall, 445-3650. municipal pool's equipment and maintenance procedures. The outdoor pool is about 23 years old and is in need of extensive rehabilitation. The Community Development pool's liner and filtration system were replaced this spring. Last week the Shakopee Community Development Commission met to discuss the development potential of the property located north of First Avenue (City Hall block). The Commission will be requesting the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority to consider allocating Planning At this same meeting, the Commission At the May 7, 1992,meeting, the Shakopee Board recommended approval of the rezoning of of Adjustment and Appeals moved to approve property located south of Vierling Drive, east of variances for a temporary accessory structure for County Road 17,west of County Road 16,and north Gerald Schesso at 1199Quincy Street. of the proposed Highway 101Bypass. This area is being recommended to be rezoned from Urban At their May 7, 1992, meeting, the Planning Residential (R-2) to Mid-Density Commission also approved two Conditional Use Permits. They approved an application for a Residential (R-3), as designated in the 1990 draft permit to operate a beauty salon home occupation for Vicky Heller at 620 County Road 78, and an Comprehensive Plan. application from Terminal Transport to continue outdoor storage of transportation equipment at The Planning Commission also recommended the 1644 East Highway 101, in the Light Industrial vacation of a 20' by 388'drainage easement in Lot zoning district. The Commission tabled an 8, Block 1, Hillwood Estates. This drainage application for a Conditional Use Permit by Rahr easement is being proposed for relocation. Malting Company for an Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility to the July 1992 meeting. Finally, the Planning Commission directed staff to establish a policy which utilizes a 200 average At this meeting, the Commission reviewed three daily trips traffic volume figure as one of the criteria for variance requests from the cul-de-sac Planned Unit Development (PUD) proposals. They recommended approval of a Planned Unit street length limit for subdivision plats. The Development (PUD) for High Five Erectors, Inc., Commissioners also discussed general location for the former Velodrome site at 700 County Road criteria for sidewalks and trails and directed staff 83; they recommended approval of an to prepare the sidewalk and trail plans and amendment to the Shakopee Valley Square 1st improvement / maintenance policies for the June Addition PUD, which would permit the Shakopee 1992 meeting. Valley Motel to be removed from the Planned Unit Development; and the Commission reviewed and continued the public hearing on the Preliminary Public Works and Final Development Plans for Dalles Townhome Addition. This proposed development The second phase of the Downtown Bridge and consists of twelve structures, each containing four Mini By-pass has been let by MnDOT and the residential units. contractor is Lunda Construction. This phase consists of constructing the bridge only. The The Planning Commission also reviewed and contractor is expected to start construction on the continued the public hearings for three proposed plats to the June 4, 1992,meeting. The preliminary bridge in mid-June. plat for Market Place contains 6 lots and is located The City Council has ordered plans prepared for near Market Street and 5th Avenue. The preliminary and final plats for South Parkview the reconstruction of 2nd Avenue between Atwood 2nd Addition contain 49 lots and is located south of Street and Apgar St. This project will be designed 12th Avenue and west of County Road 15. The and bid in conjunction with the Apgar St. project. preliminary plat for Maple Trails Estates contains Construction is expected to begin in July, 1992. 3lsingle family lots and is located east of County Road 17,across from Timber Trails Addition. The Commission recommended approval of the final plat for Dominion Hills to the City Council. The proposed plat contains 9 single family lots and is located east of County Road 17and south of Hillside Drive. -3 June e 1 9 9 2 UPCOMING MEETINGS SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 4:30pm Public 7:OOpm City 7:30pm Planning Utilities Council Commission Meeting 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 7:OOpm City 5:30pm Council Community Meeting Development Commission 7:OOpm Municipal Facility Commission 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 7:OOpm Park & Rec. Board 28 29 30 May July SMTWTFS SMTWTFS 1 2 1 2 3 4 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 31 05/28/1992 411'0 MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Regular Session May 20, 1992 Chairman Drees called the meeting to order at 7 : 00 P.M. with Commissioners Drees, Kelly, and Case present. Commissioners Ward and Mars were absent. Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator, and Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner, were also present. Also in attendance at the meeting were Barb Latham of Scott County Human Services, Mike Opatz of the Regional Transit Board, and Mike Berkopec of Waste Management. Commissioners Kelly/Case moved to approve the minutes of the March 18 , 1992 , meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock stated that in view of the number of representatives from various organizations, he would like to request that the agenda be reorganized. Agenda Item #5, Request For Refuse Rate Increase, was moved up to Item #3 , and Agenda Item #3 , Clean Up Day Review, was changed to Agenda Item #5. Mr. Stock presented information regarding the refuse rate increase request by Waste Management. He stated that on February 15th the City began a new three year contract with Waste Management. Due to increasing landfill rates at Kraemer' s Landfill, Waste Management has requested a rate increase. Mr. Mike Berkopec, General Manager for Waste Management, Inc. informed the Commissioners that a landfill disposal increase was to go into effect on January 1st. He had suggested delaying his request for an increase until such a time that Waste Management could evaluate other disposal options that might reduce the impact of the landfill increase. Mr. Berkopec stated that new techniques have been utilized to keep rates down. The addition of a new truck and transfer system would allow Waste Management to transfer Shakopee' s garbage to a more economical sanitary landfill. Although there would be additional truck and labor costs, this system would help lower the overall disposal cost to the City of Shakopee. The transferring of refuse collected in Shakopee to a landfill in Anoka would be in the best interest of the City and would in fact be cheaper for Shakopee residents than requiring the current hauler to dispose of refuse collected in Shakopee at the Kraemer Landfill in Burnsville. The impact of the transfer option will increase the monthly collection rate on a 60 gallon container by 56¢ per month and 28¢ per month on a 30 gallon container. Although this is still a rate increase, it will not be near what the rate increase would have been without the new techniques. Mr. Berkopec stated that with the new truck Minutes of the Page - 2 Energy and Transportation Committee May 20, 1992 system, the body of the collection vehicle would detach when it is full. When three of these detached "tube-like" structures build up, a transporter would haul all three of them to the Anoka landfill at one time. Although there are landfill savings at the Anoka site, the additional costs of a truck, plus one man, would increase costs above the current rates. Mr. Berkopec stated that without the transfer option, the 1992 disposal rate would require an increase of $2 , 860. 00 per month. The required increase using the transfer option would be $1, 525. 30 per month. Kelly/Case moved to recommend to the City Council that the 1992 Refuse Fee Schedule be amended to reflect the $1, 525. 30 per month increase in refuse disposal costs. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock introduced Mike Opatz, project manager at the Regional Transit Board and stated that he would be discussing the Americans with Disabilities Act, Metro Mobility, the Regional Transit Board' s vision for the future, and the availability of RTB funding. Mr. Opatz stated that the City of Shakopee' s Dial-A-Ride and Vanpool service is funded under the opt-out program. Shakopee is eligible to receive 90% of the property tax levied for transit in its community. Mr. Opatz stated that starting in 1994 , opt-out programs will be able to carry over for one year the funds that they were eligible for, but they did not spend. In addition, starting with 1993 contracts, the capital portion of the service providers hourly rate will be paid through the capital bond process instead of property taxes. Both of these measures will increase the funds available for operating expenditures. Mr. Opatz stated that Metro Mobility costs over the last several years have continued to rise above the funds that were available to provide the service. In addition, both providers and customers have complained about the quality and effectiveness of the service. He stated that the RTB is in the process of developing a new plan. However, what he says today could change tomorrow. In an attempt to control costs and provide a more effective service, the RTB is proposing splitting the current Metro Mobility service area into two areas. The core area would serve Minneapolis, St. Paul, and 30 suburbs, utilizing one metro mobility provider selected through a competitive procurement process. Currently 95% of all metro mobility riders are located inside the core area. Outside the core area, the local communities would be responsible for providing service to the disabled. For the City of Shakopee, this would require its systems to become fully accessible or to coordinate with the Scott County Human Services transportation program, to provide trips for the elderly and the disabled. However, per the Americans with Disabilities Act, passed by Congress in 1991, all public transit systems must become accessible to the disabled community. On the average, Shakopee' s 45 certified metro mobility Minutes of the Page - 3 Energy and Transportation Committee May 20, 1992 riders make a total of 24 trips per week. Barb Latham, of Scott County Human Services, stated that about 99% of the people utilizing Metro Mobility are handicapped,and going from Shakopee to Hopkins and Chanhassen. Mr. Opatz stated that the Vision for Transit is a plan that outlines the future development of transit in the Twin Cities, focusing on a multi-mobile approach. The Vision integrates neighborhood circulators, Dial-A-Rides, feeder buses, regular route transit hubs, park and ride lots, HOV lanes, LRT vanpooling, and ride sharing to meet the diverse mobility needs of the region' s residents. He stated that the RTB received $62 , 000, 000 in bonding authority from the 1992 legislature to begin implementing the Vision. The overall purpose of the Vision is to make the transit alternative more competitive with the single person automobile. The benefits of the Vision include improved accessible service for the disabled community, reduced congestion, improving the environment, and curtailing road construction. Transit hubs would be established at suburban shopping centers, allowing people to transfer easily between different types of transit services. Express bus service would run between the hubs and downtowns, acting as spokes that give people improved access to both downtown and suburban locations, and faster travel times. Eventually this full concept will be expanded to include express bus service between the transit hubs. The Commissioners thanked Mr. Opatz for the information he provided. Mr. Stock stated that the City conducted its Community Recyclable Cleanup Day on May 2 , 1992 . He stated that the City had been successful in receiving $5, 073 in grant revenues from Scott County and an additional $393 . 00 from Louisville Township to offset program costs. On May 2nd, over 250 vehicle passed through the cleanup site. There were very few problems with this year' s cleanup. In fact, Mr. Stock stated that this year' s cleanup was the most efficient and cost effective to date. The revenues that were generated were able to cover all costs, including City Public Works and Administration staff time. No financial allocation was needed from the City' s General Fund Budget. Mr. Stock stated that he has been in contact with Mr. Al Frechette, Scott County Environment Health Coordinator, who has reported that funding will again be available in 1993 for a cleanup program. He strongly encouraged the Commission to pursue the program again in 1993 , and in a similar fashion to what was conducted this year. He proposed that consideration should be given to either increasing the gate fees for recyclable items or charging a separate fee for certain recyclable items, such as appliances. Mr. Stock discussed the monthly reports and stated that both the Vanpool, the Saturday Dial-A-Ride, and the weekly Dial-A-Ride are looking very healthy. He informed the Commissioners that the next Minutes of the Page - 4 Energy and Transportation Committee May 20, 1992 regular meeting is scheduled for June 17th. However, if there is nothing on the agenda, staff would be sending out a notice of the meeting' s cancellation. Case/Kelly moved to adjourn at 8 : 10 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner TENTATIVE AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Session Shakopee, MN June 4 , 1992 Chairperson Terry Joos Presiding 1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of Agenda 3 . Approval of the May 7 , 1992 , Meeting Minutes 4 . Recognition by Planning Commission of Interested Citizens. 5. 8 : 00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider an application for the preliminary plat of Market Place, lying west of Market St. and north of 5th Avenue. Applicant: Dave Rutt and Merle Volk Action: Preliminary Plat Approval 6 . 8 : 10 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider an application for the preliminary plat of Maple Trails Estates, lying on the east side of County Rd. 17 across from Timber Trails Addition. Applicant: Laurent Builders, Inc. Action: Preliminary Plat Approval 7 . 8 : 20 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider the preliminary and final planned unit development of Dalles Townhome Addition, lying directly south of Vierling Dr. and south of Ruby and Sapphire Lanes. Applicant: Dale Dahlke Action: Preliminary and Final PUD Approval 8 . 8 : 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider a conditional use permit to allow retail sales and rentals of motor homes in the I-2 district. Applicant: Jack Brambilla Action: Resolution No. 638 9 . 8 : 40 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the rezoning of the property at 300 E. 1st Avenue from a B-1 (Highway Business) to B-3 (Central Business) . Applicant: Dr. David C. Eckart, D.D. S. 10. 8 : 50 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider an application for the preliminary and final plat of South Parkview 2nd Addition, lying directly north of 13th Avenue and west of County Rd. 15. Applicant: Cletus Link Action: Preliminary and Final Plat Approval 11. Sidewalk/Trail Plan 12 . Reviews: A. NBZ - CUP Review Continued 13 . Other Business A. B. C. 14 . Adjourn Lindberg S. Ekola City Planner NOTE TO PLANNING MEMBERS: 1. If you have any questions or need additional information on any of the above items, please call Terrie or Aggie on the Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting at 445-3650 . 2 . If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting. TENTATIVE AGENDA BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Regular Session Shakopee, MN June 4 , :_992 Chairperson William Mars Presiding 1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of Agenda 3 . Approval of May 7 , 1992 , Meeting Minutes 4 . Recognition by Board of Adjustments and Appeals of Interested Citizens. 5 . 7 : 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider a variance to the side yard setback at 1197 Jackson St. Applicant: Steven Kurvers Action: Resolution No. 636 6. 7 : 40 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider a variance to the required street side yard setback for a fence at 971 Swift St. Applicant: Andrew and Eliane Unseth Action: Resolution No. 637 7 . 7 : 50 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider a variance to the required sign size for a temporary sign at future site of Brambilla Motors. Applicant: Jack Brambilla Action: Resolution No. 639 8 . Other Business a. b. c. 9 . Adjourn Lindberg S. Ekola City Planner NOTE TO THE B.O.A.A. MEMBERS: 1. If you have any questions or need additional information on any of the above items, please call Terrie or Aggie on the Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting. 2 . If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting. ri OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MAY 20, 1992 Vice Chairperson Brandmire called the meeting to order at 5 : 30 p.m. with the following members present; Jon Albinson, Charles Brandmire and Mark Miller. Commissioners Mars, Phillips and Van Horn were absent. Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator was also present. Mr. Stock noted that Commissioner Otto recently resigned from the Commission. Therefore, a quorum would require at least four of the remaining six members in attendance. Since a quorum was not present Mr. Stock noted that the minutes of the March 18, 1992 meeting could not be approved at this time. Mr. Stock also noted that any recommendation made by the Committee this evening would not be official in light of the fact that a quorum was not present. Mr. Stock stated that he felt it was important to discuss with the members present some of the preliminary work that has been done on the downtown analysis. Mr. Albinson questioned the status of the 1990 comp plan. Mr. Stock stated that several sections of the plan have not been approved by the Metropolitan Council. Mr. Stock noted that staff is working on the changes and planned on having them submitted in the near future. Commissioner Albinson stated that he wanted to go on record noting the importance of completing the comp plan by the end of this year. Mr. Stock reported that on March 31, 1992 at a Committee of the Whole meeting City Council directed staff to prepare a study noting the pros and cons of the various redevelopment options for the property located North of 1st Avenue between Holmes and Lewis Street. Staff was also requested to look at funding options and property tax benefits should a project be considered. Mr. Stock stated while much of the background work has already been completed, we are now faced with the task of assessing the potential benefits and cost of various revitalization options. Mr. Stock shared with the Committee an evaluation process that he is proposing to utilize as a methodology for assessing the rehabilitation potential of the existing buildings and for estimating the public cost relative to value received of various development options. Following the process will hopefully provide the Committee and the HRA with a full understanding of the impact of our decisions. Mr. Stock stated that prior to doing more thorough research on revitalization methodologies, he had a preconceived notion of what could be accomplished on the property in question. Upon reading further information on revitalization strategies followed in other communities, he noted that he is not certain of what option should be pursued at this time. He hoped that the evaluation process Official Proceedings of the May 20, 1992 Shakopee Community Development Commission Page -2- proposed will help insure that the analysis is fair and comprehensive in nature. Mr. Stock stated that the evaluation process can be divided into five major sections. He hoped that over the next five to six months we could complete the process and provide a recommendation to the HRA. Discussion ensued on the opportunities and constraints offered by the property in question. Mr. Stock stated that the property in question is presently comprised of five separate land owners. Mr. Albinson stated that the property is critical in that it is one of the major entry points into our community. He stated that control over the development potential of the property is critical. Discussion ensued on the community goals, objectives and priorities for revitalization of the area in question. Mr. Stock shared with the Commission portions of the 1990 draft comp plan as it related to downtown revitalization. Mr. Miller stated that while the goals seemed to support revitalization he questioned exactly what City Council ' s goal was in regard to this project. He noted that there is a big difference between encouraging revitalization and actually committing financially to revitalization. Mr. Miller also questioned what Council ' s ideas were in terms of time frame for pursuing any development option. Commissioner Brandmire stated that he also felt it was important to get input from not only the downtown business owners but the community regarding their vision for the downtown area. Commission Miller stated that he would like to see between 10 and 20 questions on the upcoming Municipal Facility Survey that would address downtown development. Miller/Albinson moved to recommend to the HRA that the municipal facility survey include between 10 and 20 questions that would address the community attitude for downtown redevelopment as well as the vision of the residents for the property in question. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Miller questioned whether or not the City has received any 1990 census data on the demographics within our community. Mr. Stock responded in the affirmative. Mr. Miller requested the information to be available at our next meeting. Discussion ensued on how to enhance the economic viability of the downtown area. Commissioner Miller stated that he felt some type of housing element was needed somewhere within the downtown area to create a captive market for the area. He stated that he did not feel housing within the block in question would make sense. Commissioner Albinson and Brandmire concurred. Discussion ensued on the possible reuse scenarios for the St. Francis Hospital when they relocate to their new campus facility. It was noted that the Official Proceedings of the May 20, 1992 Shakopee Community Development Commission Page -3- reuse of this facility could have an impact on the economic viability of the downtown area. Mr. Miller questioned whether or not the Commission should be looking at a project area beyond the block in question. Mr. Stock stated that while Council has made it fairly clear to focus on the City Hall block it is difficult to look at the block without taking a look at the surrounding property and its current use and/or future potential. Mr. Brandmire questioned whether or not staff has conducted an individual assessment of the physical condition of each building. Mr. Stock responded in the negative. He did note that he planned on having one of the City Building Inspectors obtain access to each property for a conditional analysis. Mr. Stock also noted that approximately 2 years ago the City Housing Inspector went through all of the units in the downtown area that were occupied with a housing unit. Mr. Stock noted that much of this information should still be on file. Discussion ensued on the various redevelopment options that have been discussed int he past. Mr. Stock noted that while it might be possible to assemble and acquire the property, today' s market conditions do not lend themselves to new commercial development. Mr. Albinson concurred. He stated that current market conditions for retail and commercial space is saturated. He stated that he felt conditions would not change until the late 1990 ' s. He went on to state that he felt it was critical for the City to some how gain development control of the property in question. Discussion ensued on demolishing the entire block. Mr. Miller stated that he felt it would be foolish to demolish buildings that are generating a tax base and then leave the property sit for 5 to 6 years. He too felt that control was necessary but that it might be some time before a developer would be interested in pursuing a project on the property. Discussion ensued on the interim possibilities if the City were successful in assembling the property. Mr. Miller suggested that perhaps some type of temporary facade could be placed on the rear side of the buildings that would at least unify the frontages. Under this scenario the City could at least then continue to generate rental revenue from the property in question. Discussion ensued on other possible development options that might be pursued within the downtown area to attract shoppers. It was the consensus of those in attendance to have staff continue working on the evaluation process identified. The meeting adjourned at 7 : 00 p.m. Barry A. Stock Recording Secretary 4 EIGHT ANNUAL BOARDS AND COMNIISSIONS PICNIC In appreciation of your time and efforts in serving as a volunteer on a Board and/or Commission for the Shakopee City Council, the Council wishes to invite you and your family to the Eight Annual Boards and Commissions Picnic. WHEN: WEDNESDAY, JULY 8TH WHERE: LIONS PARK TIME: 6:00 - 7:00 P.M.- BUFFET PICNIC DINNER PROVIDED 6:30 - 8:20 P.M.- ENJOYTHEMUNTCIPALPOOL AND WATERSLIDE* AND PARTICIPATE IN GAMES** PLEASE RSVP (YES OR NO) BY JUNE 29TH TO TAMI OR TONI #445-3650 * TO PREVENT SCRATCHING OF SURFACE, NO ZIPPERS, METAL TABS, BUTTONS, OR JEWELRY ARE ALLOWED ON THE WATERSLIDE. ** PICNIC KITS WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE SHAKOPEE PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT. TENTATIVE AGENDA REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JUNE 2, 1992 Mayor Gary Laurent presiding 1] Roll Call at 7: 00 P.M. 2] Approval of Agenda 3] Recess for H.R.A. Meeting 4] Re-convene 5] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 6] Mayor's Report 7] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 8] Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. ) 9] Approval of the Minutes of May 19, 1992 10] Communications: *a) Liz Hochholter, resident parking near senior high *b] Shakopee Public Schools, tax negotiations w/Ladbroke 11] 7:30 Public Hearings: a] Proposed Vacation of 20 ' Drainage Easement in Lot 8, Block 1, Hillwood Estates (Res. No. 3580) b] Proposed 1992 Sidewalk Replacement Program, Project No. 1992-7 (Res. No. 3598) 12] Boards and Commissions: Energy and Transportation: a] Refuse Rate Increase Request (Res. No. 3599) TENTATIVE AGENDA June 2 , 1992 Page -2- 13] Reports from Staff: a] 5 Year Capital Equipment List b] Vacant Police Sergeancy *c] Approve Bills In The Amount of $210, 032 . 31 *d] MN Valley 7th Addition Request for Deferral of Park Dedication Fee e] Swimming Pool Pump *f] Recommendation to City Council from Committee of the Whole on New City Hall Construction 14] Resolutions and Ordinances: *a] Res. 3600 - Approving Plans & Specs and Advertising for Bids for 12th Avenue Watermain, Project No. 1992-4 b] 15] Other Business: a] b] c] d] 16] Recess for an Executive Session to discuss litigation 17] Re-convene 18] Adjourn to Tuesday, June 16, at 7:00 P.M. Dennis R. Kraft City Administrator REMINDER: June 5, 1992 Committee of the Whole Meeting at Marquette Bank - 7:30 A.M. TENTATIVE AGENDA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting June 2 , 1992 1. Roll Call at 7: 00 P.M. 2 . Approval of the May 13 , 1992 Meeting Minutes 3 . Rehab Grant Program Application Approval 4 . Downtown Redevelopment Survey 5. Special Assessment on HRA Property 6 . Other Business a) b) 7 . Adjourn Dennis R. Kraft Executive Director OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPECIAL SESSION CITY OF SHAKOPEE MAY 13 , 1992 Chairman Robert Sweeney called the meeting to order at 8 : 30 A.M. with Commissioners Gary Laurent and Gloria Vierling present. Commissioners Joan Lynch and Michael Beard arrived later. Also present were Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator; Barry Stock, Ass 't. City Administrator; Karen Marty, City Attorney; Gregg Voxland, Finance Director; and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk. Vierling/Laurent moved to approve the Special Call of The Vice- Chair. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Laurent moved to approve the minutes of May 5, 1992 . Motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Beard arrived and took his seat. Mr. Stock asked if the sale of HRA property to Mr. Rutt could be added to the agenda. Commissioners agreed to the addition. Laurent/Beard moved to approve the agenda. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock explained that the closing is set for May 29th on the property that Mr. Rutt is purchasing from the HRA [5th and Market] . He also explained that Mr. Rutt' s application for plat approval of the property he is purchasing from the City was tabled at the recent planning commission meeting. Because the plat approval has been tabled, Mr. Rutt is requesting that the closing date contained in the purchase agreement be extended. Mr. Stock advised the Commission that extending the closing date would fit the City' s plans because it will give the City more time to complete the transactions with Ms. Teneyck. Beard/Vierling authorized the extension of the closing date in the purchase agreement with Mr. Rutt to a date mutually acceptable to staff and Mr. Rutt. Motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Lynch arrived and took her seat at approximately 8 : 40 A.M. Mr. Dave MacGillivray, Senior Vice President, Springsted, Public Finance Advisors recapped the HRA direction of May 5th relating to reducing the assessment agreement for Canterbury Downs. He then explained the current and proposed configurations on the market value and gross taxes for Canterbury Downs. He also explained the current and proposed configurations for the contribution to the school district. If there is a reduction in the assessment agreement resulting in less taxes, Mr. MacGillivray explained that the accompanying security will guarantee payment of taxes through pay 1995 at thich time a majority of the current TIF debt will be Official Proceedings of the May 13 , 1992 Housing and Redevelopment Authority Page -2- retired. He went on to explain that there would be sufficient funds generated from now until 2002 from other pledged TIF districts to pay remaining debt service from 1996 until 2002 . Mr. Tom Hay, Dorsey, Whitney Law Firm, explained that the draft amendment to the assessment agreement reduces the value on the grandstand more and the value on the backstretch less. This is an advantage to the City because the backstretch district will exist after the grandstand district terminates in 1994 . Mr. Hay explained a few additional changes that need to be made to the draft payment assurances and security agreement provided to the Commissioners. 1. In section 2 . 02 , the letter of credit will be provided on or before June 15, 1992 instead of May 30, 1992 . 2] Language will be added to section 2 . 02 terminating the agreement in the event the letter of credit is not provided by June 15, 1992 . 3 ] Language will be added to section 2 . 02 addressing the amount Canterbury will remit to the city for the school district, hence insuring the school district payment in the event of bankruptcy. 4] Canterbury has asked that section 3 . 03 be amended so that Canterbury will be reimbursed any money drawn on the letter of credit by the City, when taxes are paid, if the money is not needed to pay debt service. Ms. Vierling questioned how that related to additional debt service. Mr. Hay responded that this language refers to whatever debt service is due and payable even if it is new debt service. Mr. Hay stated that there were minor word changes needed in sections 6 and 8 . The Commission recessed at 9 : 19 A.M. so that the Commissioners could read the documents just provided to them. The Commission re-convened at 9 : 35 A.M. Vierling/Beard offered Resolution No. 92-1, A Resolution Authorizing Defeasance and Payment and Redemption of Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, Series 1985, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Official Proceedings of the May 13 , 1992 Housing and Redevelopment Authority Page -3- Lynch/Beard offered Resolution No. 92-2, A Resolution Authorizing Execution and Delivery of Amendment to Assessment Agreement and Tax Payment and Security Agreement (including changes mentioned by Mr. Hay) , and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Vierling moved to adjourn to the next regular session of the HRA on June 2nd. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 9:42 A.M. Dennis R. Kraft Executive Director Judith S. CoxO� Recording Secre ry 43 MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, HRA Executive Director FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Rehab Grant Program Application Approval DATE: May 27, 1992 INTRODUCTION: On May 26, 1992 Mr. Tom Kline submitted a Rehab Grant Program application to the HRA for their consideration and approval. BACKGROUND: This past January the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority approved continuing the Rehab Grant Program for an additional one year period with $25, 000 to be allocated for eligible grant requests. The grant application submitted by Mr. Tom Kline is for the property located at 140 South Holmes Street (Mertz\Horeish building) . Mr. Kline is proposing to construct an awning over the building frontage similar in design to the Turtle' s Bar awning. (See attachment #1) The awning and improved signage are eligible improvements under the Rehab Grant Program guidelines. The total estimated project cost for the awning and signage improvements is $3 , 165. 00. The program provides up to 25% of this amount in the form of a grant to Mr. Kline if the application is approved. Staff is recommending approval of the Rehab Grant Program application request as submitted. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the appropriate HRA officials to execute a Rehab Grant Program agreement with Mr. Tom Kline for a grant amount not to exceed $791. 25 . 2 . Do not approve funding for the grant application as submitted. 3 . Table action pending further information from staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to authorize the appropriate HRA officials to execute a Rehab Grant Program agreement by and between the Shakopee HRA and Mr. Tom Kline for a grant amount not to exceed $791. 25 . _____ il--Ni H___, 1 ________ 1 il F-AT s L _______ .._ _, _T it, nE_ I___L___ . . O rt rt pi H ,....30 -: cr 1 Ez 10 L '''s- • 3 CC) � JI 11*1 O` ' aYrF - 1 {YMn' , N w I O- aH Z\I A 1 OWAALJL „5„ . .. IIS tl • M N k" \lJ 4 " ut g YI • Y w 0 q 8 0 4kLf MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, HRA Executive Director FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Downtown Redevelopment Survey DATE: May 27 , 1992 INTRODUCTION: On March 31, 1992 the Shakopee City Council discussed the area north of First Avenue at a Committee of the Whole meeting. At that time it was the consensus of Council that staff should prepare a study for the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority noting the pros and cons of the various redevelopment options and resultant property tax benefits should a project be considered. BACKGROUND: Staff is taking the Community Development Commission through a formal evaluation process that will allow us to do an analysis of the comparative merits of various development alternatives. (See attachment #1) On May 20, 1992 the Community Development Commission met for the first time to begin discussing the redevelopment potential of the property in question. At this meeting the Commission spent much of their time identifying opportunities and constraints associated with the property. The Commission did express some concern regarding the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority' s ultimate goal for the property in question. The Commission also expressed a concern regarding the exact project area to be analyzed. The Community Development Commission feels that it is critical for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to identify official goals and revitalization objectives for the project area. Since it appears that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority may be a major catalyst for revitalization, the results of our efforts should be a project which meets overall community needs. The task of establishing goals and objectives is not easy, but is crucial for developing some rationale or reference point to be established against which all alternatives are weighed. The Commission feels that some analysis of public opinion should be made at this time. The Commission is recommending that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority consider including 10 - 20 attitude/visionary questions on the upcoming municipal facilities survey that would focus on downtown revitalization. Since this project is a project being considered by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, it would be appropriate to utilize the professional services account within the Housing and Redevelopment Authority budget. At this time, there are adequate funds available within the existing 1992 budget of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority for this type of analysis. The cost estimate for the number of questions to be included on the survey would be approximately $90 . 00 per question. Staff is recommending that the HRA consider approving the allocation of $2 , 000 from the Professional Services account of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority budget to fund between 10 and 20 questions on the upcoming municipal facilities survey that would address downtown revitalization. Staff is also proposing that a similar survey of downtown business owners and other retailers in the community be conducted internally by City staff. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the appropriate HRA officials to work with Decision Resources to include a number of questions on the upcoming municipal facilities survey to address downtown revitalization at a cost not to exceed $2 , 000. 2 . Do not include questions on the upcoming municipal facilities survey that address downtown revitalization. 3 . Utilize in-house staff to conduct a survey of Shakopee residents. 4 . Hire a professional research firm to conduct a separate study on downtown revitalization efforts. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1. ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the appropriate HRA officials to work with Decision Resources to include a number of questions on the upcoming municipal facilities survey to address downtown revitalization at a cost not to exceed $2 , 000. . C - 0 C .▪ .o - 2 u o` 0 Q I 1"-:' 2 . m WN Q W 1 u a. d C x o U I 1 U I I - .c > a o o a ' y = a u oE > f c CU m GO o C c o o 'vG = c u y . 2 v _ - gm ar a m W o 0 a. p oLi o �y LL {� C W o m t I r_ ,it., Nt V. m . u _ > > Q .0 > u . 2' m — ; m = e m O o . '- • p `m p o o - Q .S o O .7c a Q LL u. V) i �— ti) 4i . u u ® . 7 = c iL is .. C . o C O — O .0 c I ++ m u i rxT, +=` x , WI r.•4 i o . y r U a E 2 I cY o : 1*5 TO: Dennis R. Kraft, Executive Director FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Special Assessment on HRA Property DATE: May 7, 1992 Introduction City Council has adopted special assessments for the 5th avenue and Market Street project and levied an assessment of $80,464.83 against HRA property. Background City Council has adopted special assessments for the 5th avenue and Market Street project and levied an assessment of $80,464.83 against HRA property. It is suggested that the assessment be paid off now versus paying it off over ten years out of the HRA Fund. Some of the assessments are for the property being sold to Mr. Rutt and the purchase agreement provides that the HRA will pay the assessments. The proceeds for the sale will be placed back into the HRA Fund. Alternatives 1. Pay off over ten years out of the HRA Fund. 2. Pay off now out of HRA Fund. Recommendation Alternative number 2. Action Requested Move to pay off the assessment against HRA property adopted by City Council on May 5, 1992, for the Market Street project in the amount of $24,346.00 for parcel 27-906132-0. $8,681.42 for parcel 27-906133-0, $5,879.92 for parcel 27- 906134-0, $32,787.02 for parcel 27-787.02 and $8,770.47 for parcel 27-097023-0 utilizing the HRA Fund. OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 19, 1992 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 8: 00 p.m. after the closing of the school board election polls. Councilmembers present: Cncl. Vierling, Sweeney, Beard, and Lynch. Also present: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator; Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; Dave Hutton, Public Works Director; and Lindberg Ekola, City Planner. The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to the new Police Officer, Scott Patrick. Sweeney/Beard moved to approve the agenda with the deletion of: llb) Special assessments on HRA property. Motion carried unanimously. Cncl. Beard, Lynch, and Sweeney gave their liaison reports. Mayor Laurent reported on his City activities the past week and on upcoming events. Mayor Laurent recognized anyone in the audience wishing to speak on any item not on the agenda. There was no response. Lynch/Sweeney moved to approve the consent business. Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Sweeney moved to approve the April 28 , 1992 meeting minutes as presented. Motion carried with Cncl. Vierling and Beard abstaining. Sweeney/Lynch moved to approve the May 5, 1992 meeting minutes as presented. Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Sweeney moved to accept, with regrets, the resignation of Elmer Otto from the Energy and Transportation Committee and the Community Development Commission. (Motion carried unanimously under consent business. ) Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing on the proposed street reconstruction to 2nd Avenue between Apgar and Atwood Streets, Project No. 1992-6 . The Public Works Director stated that the plans and specifications for street improvements to Apgar Street, between 1st Avenue and 6th Avenue, including the construction of 2nd Avenue, between Apgar Street and Pierce Street, and the construction of Pierce Street, between 2nd Avenue and 3rd Avenue has been approved by the Council. He added that this public hearing is to consider the feasibility of including 2nd Avenue between Apgar and Atwood Streets in this project. Official Proceedings of the May 19, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -2- The Public Works Director gave the feasibility report of including 2nd Avenue between Apgar and Atwood Streets for street improvements. He also presented the proposed assessment calculations for this portion of the project. Mayor Laurent asked for comments from the audience. There was no response. Mayor Laurent closed the public hearing. Beard/Lynch offered Resolution No. 3593 , A Resolution Ordering An Improvement And The Preparation Of Plans And Specifications For 2nd Avenue, Between Apgar Street And Atwood Street, Project No. 1992-6, and moved for its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Beard/Vierling moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the Contract Extension Agreement with Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc. , to complete the engineering and design services associated with this project for an estimated fee not-to-exceed $4 , 100. 00. Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Sweeney offered Resolution No. 3591, A Resolution Of The City Of Shakopee, Minnesota, Approving The Final Plat Of Dominion Hills, and moved for its adoption. (Motion carried unanimously under consent business. ) Lynch/Sweeney offered Resolution No. 3590, A Resolution Of The City Of Shakopee, Minnesota, Approving The Amendment To The Planned Unit Development For Shakopee Valley Square, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried unanimously under consent business. ) The City Planner gave the report on a proposed policy, which is to aid in determining the length of cul-de-sac streets. He stated one of the criteria for the policy is to utilize a 200 Average Daily Trip (ADT) formula. Discussion was held on how the 200 ADT formula could change as changes occur after lots have been developed. Sweeney/Vierling moved to direct staff to establish an interim policy on street cul-de-sac lengths, to be effective until September 1, 1992, which amongst other criteria utilizes the 200 average daily trip (ADT) formula. Motion carried unanimously. The City Planner gave the background and reasons for the request to rezone properties south of Vierling Drive, east of County Road 17 , west of County Road 16, and north of T.H. 101 Bypass from Urban Residential (R-2) to Mid-density Residential (R-3) . Official Proceedings of the May 19, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -3- Discussion was held on whether or not a plat had been approved for Dale Dahlke that consisted of single family dwellings in this area. The City Planner responded that this is no longer a viable plat for Mr. Dahlke. He added that the City Council had not approved the initial plat for this area due to unresolved issues. Vierling/Lynch offered Ordinance No. 335, Fourth Series, An Ordinance Of The City Of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending The Zoning Map To Rezone Properties South Of Vierling Drive, West Of County Road 16, North Of The Proposed T.H. 101 Bypass, And East Of The 18 Acre Commercially Zoned Property East Of County Road 17 From R-2 To R-3 , and moved for its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. The City Planner stated that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the preliminary and final Planned Unit Development for an office and warehouse for High Five Erectors, Inc. , located on the former Velodrome site. Mayor Laurent asked for comments from the developers. There were none. Beard/Vierling offered Resolution No. 3592 , A Resolution Approving The Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development for High Five Erectors, Inc. , and moved for its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion was held on the information presented to the City Council by the Public Works Director on the Scott County 5-year Construction Program. Lynch/Sweeney moved to pay off the assessment against city property adopted by Council on May 5, 1992, for the Market Street project in the amount of $2, 940. 00 utilizing the Capital Improvement Fund. (Motion carried unanimously under consent business. ) Lynch/Sweeney moved to approve the bills in the amount of $438 , 187 . 84 . (Motion carried unanimously under consent business. ) Sweeney/Lynch moved to remove from the table the vacant Police Sergeancy item. Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Beard moved to table discussion on the vacant Policy Sergeancy to June 2 , 1992 . Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Sweeney moved to appoint Barry Stock as Acting City Clerk from May 23 , 1992 through May 31, 1992 . (Motion carried unanimously under consent business. ) Official Proceedings of the May 19, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -4- The Assistant City Administrator stated that the air conditioner and heating unit at the Public Works Building is currently inoperable. He added that staff has received a cost estimate for repairs from Associated Mechanical. Discussion was held on the budget set aside for the Contingency Fund and whether or not the City was under any obligation to contract these repair services with Associated Mechanical. The City Council recommended that staff get additional quotes and recommendations from other sources for the repairs to the existing air conditioner and heating unit at the Public Works Building. Sweeney/Vierling moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to purchase a new air conditioner/heating unit for the Public Works Building at a cost not to exceed $7, 500. 00 with funding of $6, 000. 00 to be supplied from the Contingency Fund and $1, 500. 00 to be supplied from the Public Works Maintenance Fund. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Vierling offered Resolution No. 3596, A Resolution Ordering the Preparation of a Report on the Extension of the VIP Interceptor from County Road 79 to the west corporate limits and moved for its adoption. Discussion was held on the need for further discussions with Jackson Township prior to any further work being done on the possible extension of the VIP Interceptor. Mayor Laurent stated this resolution could force the annexation issue for Jackson Township, and he wants the City to take a concerned approach to any annexation. Motion carried unanimously on Resolution No. 3596. Sweeney/Lynch moved to make the report on the extension of the VIP Interceptor available to Jackson Township at the same time it is made available to the City Council. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent asked for comments from Clete Link, developer of parcels in the affected area. Clete Link stated he is not interested in the VIP sewer at this time, and requested the City Council take action on his plat. He added that a resolution was approved in 1985 for a lift station to his property in this area, and he will seek legal action if necessary. Official Proceedings of the May 19, 1992 Shakopee City Council Page -5- Mr. Link requested the City Council look at the assessments on these parcels as he is already paying for the VIP. He stated these assessments are to be deferred, but have not been. He added there is no benefit to him at this time. The City Planner stated that the Planning Commission will be making a recommendation to the City Council relative to Mr. Link' s proposed subdivision. Sweeney/Lynch moved to extend the temporary Recreation Assistant' s employment through November 1, 1992 . Motion carried unanimously. Lynch/Sweeney moved to declare the contract with Devin Construction for the 1991 Sidewalk Replacement Program, Project No. 1991-7 forfeited, and directed staff to notify the contractor of this action. (Motion carried unanimously under consent business. ) Lynch/Sweeney offered Resolution No. 3597, A Resolution Of The City Of Shakopee, Minnesota, Authorizing City Officials To Release Special Assessments On Highway Right-of-way, and moved for its adoption. (Motion carried unanimously under consent business. ) Lynch/Sweeney offered Resolution No. 3594 , A Resolution Calling A Hearing On The 1992 Sidewalk Replacement Program, Project No. 1992- 7, and moved for its adoption. (Motion carried unanimously under consent business. ) Lynch/Sweeney offered Resolution No. 3595, A Resolution Approving The Plans And Specifications For Stage 2A (South Bridge Approach Between T.H. 101 And The Minnesota River) The Bloomington Ferry Bridge Project No. S.P. 70-618-10, and moved for its adoption. (Motion carried unanimously under consent business. ) The City Council recessed at 9 : 30 p.m. for the Executive Session to discuss collective bargaining. Mayor Laurent re-convened the meeting at 10: 02 p.m. No action was taken by the City Council during the Executive Session. Sweeney/Vierling moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 10: 02 p.m. 11110 4)1(-1 d•OX- J d'th S. Cox C t Clerk Jane VanMaldeghem Recording Secretary * 10 a., CO1\!! SE \1T May 4.199_ To City Engineer %Dave Hutton Saturday May 2.1992 our family attended a dance competition at Shakopee High School. My daughters scheduled time was 3:00 p.m. The parking lot was full with many cars driving through. We respected the grass near the parking lot of the school. so we chose not to park on the grass. We parked on a side street. We drove up the street to see a parking spot on the opposite side of the street. . ' - We did not see the resident only parking sign. Yes. we received a ticket. My question is, what am I suppose to do? I have to pay $10.00 because I parked on the street. I did not litter. I did not block a :driveway. I did not drive or park on the grass--I parked on the street. I understand what happened, that there were 3 complaints, 80 tickets issued for people parking on the street and the real reason why the signs were up. Maybe specified hours and days should also be posted. My children are small, I had alot to carry and could not park miles from the school and I could not drop them off. We are from out of town and it would not pay to appear in court and take time off from my work. This dance competition is held twice a year at Shakopee High School. so we will be back. We did not leave your city with good feelings, we felt very unwelcomed. We were in Shakopee Saturday and Sunday, two lunches times five and two dinners times five. Perhaps from reading my letter, you might agree with me and also say it is a catch 22. But. I 'm still out $10.00. I would feel much better if my $10.00 went towards a better sign with specified hours and days, like M-F 07:30-02:05. Remember, your city of Shakopee is not a small town anymore. Sincerely, 940 Ca / 1/() oeet2A 164 Mg RECOMMENDED ACTION: LS-110 Receive and file the correspondence from Liz Hochhoiter 'dated May 4, 1992 regarding a parking ticket. - • 4 / 0 h, Shakopee Public Schools District Office Shakopee School Board 505 S. Holmes Street Janet L.Wendt,Chair Suzanne Van Hout,Vice Chair Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Jane Carlson,Clerk Aggie Unze,Treasurer (612) 445-4884 • Fax (612) 445-8446 Thomas Ebner,Director Jessica Geis,Director Director of Administrative Services Bob Techam,Director Ronald E.Ward Superintendent Director of Business Services Robert J.Ostlund Robert N.Martin May 19, 1992 Mr. Dennis Kraft City Hall 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee,MN 55379 Dear Dennis: No public entity has had a better reason to appreciate the actions of another public entity than the Shakopee Public Schools. The concern for Shakopee students shown by the City of • Shakopee in its tax negotiations with Ladbroke Racing was truly outstanding. When a public body in a community works so hard to protect the interest of another organization that serves the public, the quality of life for the whole community is enhanced. The City Council and City Administration have demonstrated a commitment to quality service for its residents. Without the school tax referendum funds from the racetrack, educational services to the members of this community would have been severely compromised. This is especially true in view of the State's fiscal difficulties that will likely escalate in the near future. The spirit of cooperation in the public interest that you have shown serves as a model for our future actions. The School District will strive to live up to the standard of cooperation in the public interest that you have demonstrated. Let's hope that your agreement with Ladbroke Racing will keep Canterbury Downs a viable member of our business community. You certainly have made every effort to help assure their survival, again, with the best interest of the public in mind. On behalf of the entire School Board and School District, please accept our thanks for reaching this agreement. Your actions are a superb example of progressive leadership. Sincerely, I. (Ii tAIS----- IC-41.--,$ )4, 13,---(Th Rober . Ostlund Janet L. Wendt Superintendent of Schools Chair, Board of Education RJO/ph ALL SCHOOLS ACCREDITED BY THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION Shakopee Public Schools: Forward Together For Our Future AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file the correspondence from the Shakopee School district dated May 19 , 1992 regarding tax negotiations with Ladbroke Racing. // oJ MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner RE: Vacation of Drainage Easement in Lot 8, Block 1, Hillwood Estates DATE: May 11, 1992 INTRODUCTION: City Staff has received a petition from Dale Dahlke to vacate the 20 ' drainage easement within Lot 8, Block 1, Hillwood Estates. The City Council will hold the public hearing on June 2 , 1992 , to consider this vacation request. At their May 7th meeting, the Shakopee Planning Commission recommended the vacation of this drainage easement. BACKGROUND: The easement being proposed for vacation is located within Hillwood Estates and within the Rural Residential (R-1) zoning district. Attached is a copy of the zoning map showing the location of the plat. (See Exhibit A. ) Also attached is a copy of the plat for Hillwood Estates. (See Exhibit B. ) Hillwood Estates was platted in the spring of 1990, and consists of 10 lots. The drainage easement that is being considered for vacation is located within lot 8, Block 1, and is 20 ' in width and 388 ' in length. DISCUSSION: Section 12 . 07 , Subd. 2 , of the Subdivision Regulations states that "Easements shall be provided for utilities and drainage where necessary and shall be at least 10 ' wide for telephone or power line easements and 20 ' wide for drainage, sewer or water easements. " The existing easement is located within the center of the lot. The applicant wishes to relocate this easement to the east to allow for an acceptable building pad for development. (See Exhibit C. ) The applicant has signed an Easement Agreement to dedicate this easement to the City of Shakopee. The Comprehensive Plan designated the area, in which the Hillwood Estates subdivision is located, as a rural residential land use. Vacating and relocating the easement for single family residential development will not conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. City staff the appropriate agencies have reviewed this proposal and recommend approval of the vacation. ALTERNATIVES: i. Approve the application to vacate the 20 ' drainage easement within Lot 8, Block 1, Hillwood Estates. 2 . Deny the application to vacate the 20 ' drainage easement within Lot 8 , Block 1, Hillwood Estates. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the application for the vacation of the 20 ' drainage easement within Lot 8 , Block 1, Hillwood Estates. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 3580, A Resolution Vacating the 20 ' Drainage Easement in Lot 8 , Block 1, Hillwood Estates, and move its adoption. RESOLUTION NO. 3580 A RESOLUTION VACATING THE 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT IN LOT 8, BLOCK 1, HILLWOOD ESTATES WHEREAS, a 20 foot wide by 388 foot long drainage easement has been dedicated through the center of Lot 8 , Block 1, Hillwood Estates; and WHEREAS, it has been made to appear to the Shakopee City Council that the aforementioned drainage easement serves no public use or interest due to the dedication of another drainage easement on the east side of the lot; and WHEREAS, the public hearing to consider the action to vacate was held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall in the City of Shakopee on the 2nd of June, 1992 ; and WHEREAS, two weeks published notice has been given in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and posted notice has been given by posting such notice on the bulletin board on the main floor of the Scott County Courthouse, the bulletin board at Shakopee Public Utilities, the bulletin board at the U. S. Post Office, the bulletin board at the Shakopee Public Library, and the bulletin board in the Shakopee City Hall; and WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard on the matter were given an opportunity to be heard at the public hearing in the Council Chambers in the City of Shakopee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. ) That it finds and determines that the vacation hereinafter described is in the public interest; 2 . ) That the 20 foot wide by 388 foot long portion of drainage easement serves no further public need; 3 . ) That all that part of the 20 ' wide drainage easement lying within Lot 8 , Block 1, Hillwood Estates, Scott County, Minnesota, be, and the same hereby is vacated; 4 . ) After the adoption of the Resolution, the City Clerk shall file certified copies hereof with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Scott County. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the day of , 1992 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney ..- .../ • , ( ( . yr. . EXHIBIT A ... d• _,...__._.,„...,_.,...,, 0 aw a IlLUI-',51-07---1411-711'--irci." ...". •• •-lr-21.1- i-t-rz--E—S717.. % .1- 1::. 1...it ir ij 4 t ii fi. '44,1, e:1 .-iv ‘0, 3:: :',.... ;;L: iti 1.,t. ,..... .,;.....s.,!:-.74....,... -• "1 f-,--z---iti"71:0 ii 1 i t ,. 3. -*" . • t;t1 .-.; %.1. -- lii it_ ! -.IL ... ..:Le_ !.2_:,..,•__; .,....- :,......- . ,.., •:-. t :.-.. --.-.•-,;,..„•• • , . --...,..: t ,. ..---.4 i.- '''''': .--- .. :::":'tiIis). ., '`.-....,.... .: k r Sf-Lx0PEE 1 (-- -f-• • - , \r-... • 71 i- , • .......„_.. __.... .....,...iirr- 1 ••••• 4•11L v;.'--., il 3 F% - . -- ... . •-, - -..... . , --,.--.-E-..i-, . , ,...,,,w, • ?-:::: i . ... u,,,,_--...-,,....„-. , , : , • r ---"'"- : = . i 1 1 \ ; •,....41. .-w-t.. --._ _ __.,. ,... 3 . t t—....; •2. - t Ii'-L-.- st ,,..,..__ . ,....4.1-1A---- ......... 1 ii0MAPC/4: ......_..-- ---"'"''' .."-......° 44-. .,. .--- *------- L....:*,-- --- —,.. _1,T7-- 1414=41111.11115W-. --.---- .._ - -----1 ... ...--rr.--— _ -- 3..."7":,Aaadx.i:1 ! % - i .. . ii -- 1: - i ' . ----.........-iiiii I; '.....paWaseekthkar ,-..r...• amu .- .......:1„.„' --- :t 1 , - : tr,. • ; - ...- : - 1 MATCH _ _. _ ! - .... , _ , ... 1 t:\ : ... .„ 11 1: , miMmimmitA/i 11 ....-%-- ----I ,.• % 1 i • --. li r--- i„.. ti; , , ______-- i ! ET"i r,1 ti, li I . T . • %,!: ,...„, . 1.'1., il I —.. ll I 0:t L'il I i Q 1r----------- -- 0 3 1 i ii zoi, 1 .1, !I si•!..triNop.ta. I 1 711 . Z 1 1 ..: a .At.S.7111 L • \ A \ ;. i. 1 . ...4 \ • 0 =I . i •;.•I • I CC i .4 . -,:. 4tt •-•,,,__ J , ..t..I • - I )••I. 1 te! : uali 1 +.7.1 ai I 1 ti ' . - ::.:•24:11+;..,:::Ill 42'1' '7.4"'.i•Vr ;I CO C40 ...3 ' ,!SA 0R .....7......t, •i ":',::::::::::.::::::::::::.,1 i t 4 MILLS:St : _LAL.L.V•-• ::::::.:.::::::::::::::::...:.,.; •••-%'S i S I! :III / t----.4 , L.7 314:410,10ti 3 R 1 1 ii 1LI ,-- I- -- I I I . 1 I 1 r...i -. Ce II I . I i .., <• 61! AG AGRICULTURE ..., ________ T 1 R1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL ,-.. i a R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL R3 MID—DENSITY RES. . •— _.--- --_ R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. -------., .., 1 _ „ _ __________ .-4 u c:t - TRAILS -- 11--- - ..---•--. 1 1 4 "•; ', • i I . .iS . B1 HIGHWAYA0091 BUSINESS • k... . , - B2 COMMUNITY BUSINESS . ty. .7-------)7,...„,„.„,...„........\::- ......f.-,., B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS 11 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL d 12 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ; N.:,..._ .”7".. ..--.\ — N • , S SHORELAND T---; -,....... f ,...cir .. , h .'n,..42, , it.. 4%..7..,C:••• G7 :.cttE .c ,_./_if 1 v" FLOODPLAIN DISTRICTIf-.VI _ Lt.. /... 1,7- -S"--) 1 --- MANDATORY PUD r... r-• RTD RACETRACK DISTR1cre..,., L —.141.__--__ ..., Zoning Map City of SHAKOPEE • -- — • - . ._ _ Ii - EXHIBIT B • :.-.1 :: EXISTING EASEMENT z I• — . . i 1 v I r • Z. ' v L. :— •,i fir . r._( • I '1 r 1�. NO.OI'03.w _ e:. - 969.36 w••+u s.r n.Nwv. t Q i Sec rs.bs.ru.Aoe 22 Z. Me srw C: 3 to o o CO.(TOWNLINE o RD. o NO. AVENUE) 79 c I8 ---------3ae.os--------� ; 520.80- ,. I I � 1 so r al) I I \ ' .1 1 r c -.0 a 1 I O N m r �_ cacd u p • I Mi.u, I ,FT • I rao.oa r - I r �' -s o•ot'oJ`r- ---I:•-••:--:...' .'-..7./.... .� 1 lI O i 1329.93—————— i `�--_— -"s c•ot'os-c --------I Ip II CO I -- - -�-3;4.23_-_ jo N _.-C w\ gI 8 ,�\ ,' . . - , « N I o ), •• rT. ... r 1 r"' 1, I .,4 \•\ ?-io+ 1 I 1 I 1 1 I •i.. ,44,. I r 1 I it., �i \ L to Po ----- s o•oeoer J 0. 92 ,^ ..,C A.4, � of g aoi---------- -- 336.77 vI - \! • I �;.k Zi I 0 I • (a o` `1' ' p i N O I ,al p c ! (� _! N N N'• N 1 r� IC) •• W O N -"-----s 0.0:'03'[ I� I • I ,A : 1 • �O 1--------339.93----- „� 301._----- _ 1 N- I4rr.b�t Y1' I fa I /mil 1 r•4 .w �o a ` 1 f ``"'26 81 � • , - I , N i ...�. e Jor3o 30l 'b. I I • Fs .,,,..'. k•— H i 43 4 46 Io w 414' 4 ' 4ncici6 � `" �.4 2: -vs —, 3: I ` — 1 ��� y11., 8 125 ? 1 I 1 " �" __ � N w o �' \, w .\' v I y " I ' I 1 "11•X43 e v v a CO I f b• S%";06..)... °a. `Jo I Us I 1 .� %"; �4o I v I ' aw v '0 0 ` o � 135 I ��m4 r 4%,,.. N �N. �i 1 I I : "� 5.,� gl L 360.76 —; r —_rtroo- i ---•n.3s — \ ' ^I —'------559.90 __i _1, 957.56 test Weetm.Nwr...rr..swwr ' S 0.16'18'E s.o IL Two.113.6"22. F' 1 woo. EXHIBIT C , I , 0 I I 1I (a) I.A- -- -- --='•s0.02'03"E -- - -- - --1 0 j3\4.25- \ �O 2 I o �o, \1,er° '1'76, � I I 1 O \\• �/ I ' I r--- 3Si 60 0 \ O. i I o Q.\ \\\ �� I I . \ i mal i \ \ • � Ir- --- - - -- 03 (ID �,in t \ N 0 30I \ p' O (:) . 0" \ I (r) _ Rl � N g i I Q61 I • (A81 1 I i N ------- so•o2'o3"E I.... I ON =0 i-------- - 359.93--------- 1 � 301- - - - - 1 �I - — — — —.— — - T I 30 V ( U C�_u 1 1201 i21 S /1 •40, .• I I I 4 " 0(0 !68 2$1W 1 _ , I w I I ( I I -- 4 301 30 30I 13. ".:: ---1 1 A 4 .'. ",, 2 I 14 (54 . . • I w ; 0 . _ \ 0 s ;._i7•• 7.$ Lk' — -- — — — - a: Vo� O • 1. , * f I. 8 -- ` / o`, v I r*i 15 ► vL te. 1.% . \ . a II /� I I N \ �/ Q � / � // I 1l �+ \ • 2 I P a. EXISTING EASEMENT w m Iref • RELOCATED EASEMENT a w I N�;4 3. I ,,,IcY) b.: Lo y I ' g�/ / _ i I I 0av I I 1 0, m I I "71�fu v� I I c3 16'18"E I - II I _ I• .� 12100 _ 1� — 351.6! L - 360.76 - - -- -- - - - - - ce-- - - - - J 957. 56 k_ E- (g)...),S 0' I6 $I8 E s MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: 1992 Sidewalk Replacement Program DATE: May 27 , 1992 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 3598 which orders an improvement and authorizes the advertisement for bids for the 1992 Sidewalk Replacement Program. A public hearing has been scheduled for June 2 , 1992 in order to consider the Sidewalk Replacement Program improvement. In 1989 the City Council adopted a policy whereby all sidewalk replacement in Shakopee would be funded 50% by the abutting property owners and 50% by the City of Shakopee. This policy was adopted in the City Code under Section 7 . 16 on August 25, 1989 . The Engineering Department has divided the City up into various sidewalk zones and inspected the sidewalk in order to determine how much sidewalk needs replacing. Since 1990 the Engineering Department has been replacing defective sidewalks on a zonal basis. A list of locations for the 1992 projects has been identified and the amount of sidewalk that needs replacing has also been determined. Staff is now ready to bid out the project and hire the contractor to do the work. Since 50% of the costs for this project will be assessed to the abutting property owner, a public hearing must be held prior to ordering the improvement. At the conclusion of the public hearing, staff is requesting permission to advertise for bids on this project. Because the 1991 project was never started or completed due to the Halloween snowstorm, staff is proposing to rebid the 1991 project with the 1992 project. Attached is Resolution No. 3598, which orders the improvement and authorizes the advertisement for bids for the 1991 and 1992 Sidewalk Replacement Program. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 3598 . 2 . Deny Resolution No. 3598 . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1, to adopt Resolution No. 3598 which orders the improvement and authorizes the advertisement for bids on this project. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 3598, A Resolution Ordering an Improvement and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for the 1991 and 1992 Sidewalk Replacement Program, Project No. 1992-7 and move its adoption. DH/pmp MEM3598 RESOLUTION NO. 3598 A Resolution Ordering An Improvement And Authorizing Advertisement For Bids For The 1991 And 1992 Sidewalk Replacement Program Project No. 1992-7 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 3594 adopted by City Council on May 19, 1992 , fixed a date for Council hearing on the proposed improvement of the 1992 Sidewalk Replacement Program; and WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held on the 2nd day of June, 1992, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 3 , 1991 for the 1991 Sidewalk Program, the project ordered by Resolution No. 3458 , and bids solicited and awarded to Devin Construction but the work never started or completed due the Halloween snowstorm; and WHEREAS, the City Council on May 19, 1992 forfeited the contract with Devin Construction; and WHEREAS, David E. Hutton, Public Works Director has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of the Sidewalk Replacement Program and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. That the 1991 and 1992 Sidewalk Replacement Program is ordered. 2 . Such plans and specifications for the Sidewalk Replacement Program, a copy of which is on file and of record in the Office of the City Engineer, are hereby approved. 3 . The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The Advertisement for Bids shall be published as required by law. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day , 1992 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney June 1, 1992 City of Shakopee Re : Project 1992-7 129 West First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 To Whom It May Concern: A Notice was sent to me regarding the sub-standard sidewalk in front of my home at 827 S. Holmes. We had sidewalk in that same spot for many many years and it was in fine condition until the City of Shakopee dug up the boulevards. At that time a new walk was installed and I firmly feel since the contractor didn't pack the earth hard enough, resulting in sunken low spots, it should be the responsibility of the City of Shakopee to replace it at their expense or to persue the "contractor" who did the work. I feel very strongly about this especially since when the boulevard was cut down a section of my sidewalk to the street slants straight down to the road making it impossible to use in the winter because it is a pure ice slide. Also in cutting down the boulevard the roots to my hugh old tree were chopped up and we lost the tree. It was not replaced by the City of Shakopee as I was told it would be. Instead we were left to obtain another tree on our own. As you can tell I feel very imposed upon by the City already and this is another unjustness. Sincerely, • Maryann S4edow 827 S. Holmes Shakopee, MN 55379 — 1 :.y°tet t .. y MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Refuse Rate Increase Request - Resolution #3599 DATE: May 28, 1992 INTRODUCTION: The City has received a request for a refuse rate increase by Waste Management, Inc. The rate increase request appears to be consistent with the terms of the Refuse Collection Contract by and between the City of Shakopee and Waste Management, Inc. The Energy & Transportation Committee is recommending approval of the rate increase. BACKGROUND: On December 3 , 1991, the Shakopee City Council authorized the appropriate City officials to enter into a Refuse/Recycling Contract with Waste Management, Inc. The initial refuse collection rates established in the contract set a 60 gallon rate at $12 . 97 and a 30 gallon rate at $11. 67 per household. In early February, Mr. Mike Berkopec, General Manager for Waste Management, Inc. informed the City of Shakopee of a landfill disposal increase that was to go into effect on January 1, 1992 . (Attachment #1) At that time, Mr. Berkopec suggested delaying his request for an increase until such time that Waste Management could evaluate other disposal options that might reduce the impact of the landfill increase. On May 13 , 1992 , I received a subsequent correspondence from Mr. Berkopec (Attachment #2) requesting Council consideration of a household refuse rate increase at this time. For the past three months, Waste Management has been utilizing a new refuse disposal system that is more cost effective than their previous arrangement. Waste Management is also transporting their refuse collected to a less expensive landfill located in Anoka. The contract entered into with Waste Management, Inc. this past January was based on the Kramer' s Landfill Tipping Rate of $63 . 00 per ton. The current contract also includes a provision that allows the contract to be reopened once within the first 6 months. However, the contract shall not be renegotiated more often than at 6 month intervals thereafter. Since landfill tipping rates have increased by more than 10% at the landfill that was being utilized by Waste Management, it would be reasonable to approve a rate increase to offset the landfill tipping rate increase. While Waste Management is experiencing a landfill tipping rate less than what was originally established in the contract, staff believes that it was the intent of the contract when it was written that the tipping rate would be based on the rate at Kramer's Landfill in Burnsville. Mr. Berkopec ' s correspondence explains in detail that if the City wishes Waste Management to continue to dispose of waste at the Kramer Landfill that the increase in collection rates would be greater than what the City would incur if Waste Management utilizes their preferred alternative which is to transfer waste collected to a less expensive landfill in Anoka. The Energy & Transportation Committee believes that the alternative selected by Waste Management in terms of transferring refuse collected in Shakopee to a landfill in Anoka would be in the best interest of the City and would in fact be cheaper for Shakopee residents than requiring our hauler to dispose of refuse collected in Shakopee at the Kramer Landfill in Burnsville. The impact of the transfer option will increase the monthly collection rate on a 60 gallon container by . 56 cents per month and . 28 cents per month on a 30 gallon container. Shown in Attachment #3 is a refuse rate analysis comparing current refuse disposal rates to the new rates that are being proposed at this time. The Energy & Transportation Committee recommending to City Council that Resolution #3599 (Attachment #4) be approved amending the 1992 Fee Schedule increasing the refuse collection rates to reflect the landfill tipping fee increase and Waste Management' s desire to transfer all disposal to a landfill located in Anoka. ALTERNATIVE: 1. Offer Resolution #3599, A Resolution Amending the 1992 Refuse Fee Schedule to Reflect an Increase in Refuse Collection and Disposal Costs. 2 . Do not amend the 1992 Refuse Fee Schedule. 3 . Table action pending further information from staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution #3599, A Resolution Amending the 1992 Refuse Fee Schedule to Reflect an Increase in Refuse Collection and Disposal Costs. BAS/tiv RESOLUTION NO. 3599 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 3507 ADOPTING THE 1992 FEE SCHEDULE PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN REFUSE/RECYCLING COLLECTION RATES WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Council passed Resolution No. 3507 adopting the 1992 Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, land fill tipping fees increased as of January 1, 1992 to $75 . 00 per ton; and WHEREAS, the refuse collection contract by and between the City of Shakopee and Waste Management Inc. provides for a refuse collection rate increase should landfill tipping rates increase by more then 10% from their December 1991 rate of $62 . 00 per ton; and WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Council finds that it will be in the best interest of the residents of the City of Shakopee to transport waste collected in conjunction with the City of Shakopee's refuse collection program to a landfill located in Anoka County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA that Resolution No. 3507 adopting the 1992 Fee Schedule hereby amended by changing the cost of refuse collection rates to the following: 1. Urban Residents 30 gallon - $13 . 04 60 gallon - $14 .74 2 . Rural Residents 30 gallon - $16. 18 60 gallon - $18 . 95 90 gallon - $20 . 66 Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1992 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney PrioduPtii.d- Wa'ste Management-Savage 12448 Pennsylvania Avenue South Savage. Minnesota 55378 A Waste Management Company 612.'890-1100 •FAX: 612/890-5143 January 20, 1992 Barry Stock City of Shakopee 129 E 1st Ave Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Barry, Following denial of their incinerator permit by the MPCA in November, 1991, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners passed a resolution establishing an additional landfill abatement fee for mixed municipal solid waste generated outside of Dakota County. This action increases the cost of disposal for City of Shakopee garbage by 22% or $13.33 per ton. This translates into a $1.09 per month per household increase over current rates. As per the contract, I would like to petition the City for •an 'increase based on a justified cost increase. Although I will be paying this higher rate effective 1-1-92, I suggest delaying my petition request until May 1, 1992, for the follwing reasons: 1) Recent RFP process and new contract. 2) The addition of mixed mail to your recycling program which may reduce overall tonnage. 3) The addition by Waste Management of a new truck/transfer system that will allow us to transfer Shakopee garbage to a more economical (less taxed) sanitary landfill. Although I will have additional truck and labor costs, the system will help to lower the overall disposal cost to the City of Shakopee. Please call me if you have questions on my request to petition for a - justified cost increase. Sincerely, WA ' L • A �•�T- 1•VAGE d/1 , 1 Mike Berkopec General Manager a division of Waste Management of Minnesota. Inc. Er& ED WAR D KRAEMER &SONS, INC. December 6, 1991 Dear Valued Customers: On December 3,1991, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners passed a resolution establishing an additional landfill abatement fee for mixed municipal solid waste generated outside of Dakota County. This additional fee will be $4.00 per cubic yard or $13.33 per ton and become effective on January 1,1992 and will be collected at all landfills within Dakota County. Mixed municipal solid waste generated in Dakota County will not be affected by this fee. There will be no increase in the base rate on January 1,1992. Although Edward Kraemer & Sons strongly supports landfill abatement programs, this additional fee is not justified by any demonstrated finanical need on the part of Dakota County. Edward Kraemer & Sons worked diligently to prevent the imposition of an out-of-county surcharge, but was successful only in reducing the fee from a possible $7.50 per cubic yard ($25.00 per ton). Edward Kraemer & Sons will continue to pursue all means posssible to further reduce or eliminate this surcharge. If you are concerned about this new tax, please call the Dakota County Commissioners personally at 438-4418. Starting January 1,1992, all haulers must disclose the origin of their load (city or township). If the load originates in more than one municipality, an estimate must be given disclosing the percentage of the load from each municipality. This disclosure is required at all landfill under provisions of the Minnsota Waste Management Act, Section 115A.882, Subdivision 2. The out-of-county surcharge will be based upon this disclosure. I have enclosed a revised rate sheet effective January 1,1992. Please call John Morley or myself if you have any questions on this matter. We appreciate your continued business with the Burnsville Sanitary Landfill. Sincerely, Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. /77 Robert D. Miller Vice President/General Manager • BURNSVILLE LANDFILL&QUARRY - 1020 WEST CLIFF ROAD BURNSVILLE,MINNESOTA 5.5.337 612-890-3611 FAX:612-890-2996 M EQw+Oppornny Engbree INV Erik EDWARD KRAEMER &SONS, INC. BURNSVILLE SANITARY LANDFILL JANUARY 1, 1992 HOURS; DIRECTIONS- Monday - Friday 6:30 am. - 430 p.m. One mile west of I.35W on Cliff Road, or Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 1130 1/2 mile north of Hwy 13 on Washburn Ave. Scale Phone: 890-3248 All Access Roads Rated at 10 Tons TOTAL W:yr • : : :a A a :. N • . ••w. Dakota County 540.00 per ton 521.09 per ton $61.09 per ton Outside Dakota County 540.00 per ton 534.42 per ton $74.42 per ton Minimum load charges for ail vehicles are as follows: Car/ Pickup/Trailer 530.00-565.00, plus abatement fees Single Axle Truck 565.00 & up, plus abatement fees Double Axle Truck S75.00 & up, plus abatement fees II Semi-Truck 5125.00 & up, plus abatement fees ' SPECIAL FEES Mattresses and Box Springs........__........ .... .._ S15.00 each • White Goods 515.00 each Tires (Car & Light Truck only).___.__ _._.....___ 55.00 each White Goods include: stoves, washers, dryers, refrigerators, freezers, residential furnaces, dishwashers, water heaters, air conditioners, microwaves, trash compactors, garbage disposals, humidifiers & dehumidifiers. 'Abatement Fees are taxes placed on the dtspasa/of mired municpal solid waste. The tees are collected at the landfill and passed on to the re..5pedive governmental entities for use in rscyChng programs The rates are es labbihed by aty and County ordinance or Slate.42w as follows- Dakota Co Ortg i Non Dakota Co Or�grn City of Burns ville_........._..._.____._. S333per ton . I33perIon Dakota County 511,99per Ion S1442per ton Slate of Minnesota.___.___.__.__ .f667perton J667perton Tota/ 511.499perb317 £M41perton ALL UNCOVERED LOADS WILL BE CHARGED DOUBLE BURNSVILLE LANDFILL&QUARRY 1020 WEST CUFF ROAD BURNSVILLE,MINNESOTA S5337 612-890-3611 FAX:612-890-2996 4 aJ 4te/ Z Waste Management—Savage 12448 Pennsylvania Avenue South Savage, Minnesota 55378 A Waste Management Company 612/890-1100• FAX: 612/890-5143 May 12 , 1992 Mg 1 ••L1992 Barry Stock City of Shakopee 129 E 1st Ave Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Barry, My new truck system is in place and successful. As I expected, this system will help to reduce the recent disposal cost increase. Currently, City of Shakopee Residents are being charged on a basis of $62 . 00 per ton for disposal. In January, 1992, the fee increased to $75 per ton due to additional taxes at the landfill. In an effort to minimize this $2860 monthly increase, Waste Management has started to transfer your garbage to a less expensive, yet environmentally safe landfill in Anoka. The current gate rate at the site is $56. 36 per ton. • The cheaper gate rate does save money, but is partially offset by increased hauling costs. The equation below outlines the cost implications: 1) No transfer option 1991 disposal (220 tons) @ $62 . 00 = $13 , 640 1992 disposal (220 tons) @ $75. 00 = $16, 500 * Required increase (No transfer) = $ 2, 860 2) Transfer option 1992 disposal (220 tons) @ $56. 36 = $12, 399 . 20 Route Savings (No landfill time) 18 hours /month @ $60/ hour ($1, 080. 00) Transporter Costs 12 .21 loads/month @ 3 . 5 hr $ 3, 846. 15 per load @ $90/hour (more expensive truck/driver) 1992 Disposal (including transfer) $15, 165. 30 *Required increase (with transfer) $ 1, 525. 30 By transferring your garbage, we have cut the potential increase by almost 50% from a projected $1. 02 per home per month to 56 cents per home on the 64 gallon rate and 28 cents per home on the 32 gallon rate. This analysis is based on 2620164 gallon customers and 180c32 gallon customers. ;;;‘:inion J` Wase 'i anagemera c. ;?. Waste Management-Savage 12448 Pennsylvania Avenue South Savage, Minnesota 55378 A Waste Management Company 612/890-1100•FAX: 612/890-5143 Barry Stock Page 2 I will be calling you shortly to discuss the possible implementation of this smaller increase effective with the July billing. . Sincerely, WA- E MANAGEMENT-S•VAGE gimmm Mike Berkopec General Manager • a division of Waste Management of Minnesc:a, !no. ATTACHMENT #3 REFUSE RATE ANALYSIS CURRENT PROPOSED CONTRACT ACTUAL* CONTRACT ACTUAL* 1. Urban Residence 32 Gallon 11. 67 12 .74 11. 95 13 . 04 64 Gallon 12 . 97 14 . 13 13 .53 14 .74 2 . Rural Residence 32 Gallon 14 . 60 15.89 14 . 88 16 . 18 64 Gallon 16. 90 18 . 36 17.46 18 . 95 90 Gallon 18 . 20 19 .76 19. 04 20. 66 * Include City Billing, Admin. and Sales Tax ADDENDUM TO AGENDA ITEM 12A In preparing the refuse rate increase request memo for City Council, I neglected to include an action to amend the refuse collection contract by and between the City of Shakopee and Waste Management, Inc. to effectuate the proposed rate increase should City Council concur with the Energy & Transportation Committee ' s recommendation. In the event City Council approves Resolution No. 3599 , amending the 1992 Fee Schedule, it would be appropriate to direct the appropriate City officials to amend the refuse collection contract by and between the City of Shakopee and Waste Management, Inc. to provide for the refuse rate increase. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to authorize the appropriate City officials to amend the refuse collection contract by and between the City of Shakopee and Waste Management, Inc. to provide for an increase in the refuse collection rate as set forth in Resolution No. 3599 . RESOLUTION NO. 3599 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 3507 ADOPTING THE 1992 FEE SCHEDULE PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN REFUSE/RECYCLING COLLECTION RATES WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Council passed Resolution No. 3507 adopting the 1992 Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, landfill tipping fees increased as of January 1, 1992 to $75. 00 per ton; and WHEREAS, the refuse collection contract by and between the City of Shakopee and Waste Management Inc. provides for a refuse collection rate increase should landfill tipping rates increase by more then 10o from their December 1991 rate of $62 . 00 per ton; and WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Council finds that it will be in the best interest of the residents of the City of Shakopee to transport waste collected in conjunction with the City of Shakopee' s refuse collection program to a landfill located in Anoka County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA that Resolution No. 3507 adopting the 1992 Fee Schedule hereby amended by changing the refuse collection rates to the following: 1. Urban Residents 30 gallon - $13 . 04 60 gallon - $14 . 74 2 . Rural Residents 30 gallon - $16 . 18 60 gallon - $18 . 95 90 gallon - $20. 66 These rates will be effective on July 1, 1992 . Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1992 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney H3 a, TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: 5 Year Equipment List DATE: May 28, 1992 Introduction Attached is the proposed 5 Year Equipment List for Council review. Background Attached are the departmental major equipment requests for the next five years (1993 - 1997) . This list is comprised of items costing $5,000 or more and is funded by transfers from the Capital Equipment Fund to the General Fund. The purchases are made out of the respective General Fund division budget. The first year (1993) will be incorporated into the 1993 General Fund budget which Council will formally adopt later in 1992. Alternatives 1. Approve as drafted. 2. Modify list. 3. Refer to Committee of the Whole for in depth discussion. Recommendation There are some larger ticket items in this list for the Fire Department and Public Works. Council may want to discuss this list in more detail and have a committee meeting like last year. It is suggested that the committee meeting take place in June so that the list can be basically finalized for department heads to use in making their budget requests in July. Action Move to refer to a Committee of the Whole meeting in June for discussion. Left off "Consent" so a date could be set in June. City of Shakopee Capital Equipment List May 28, 1992 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT REVOLVING FUND Fund Balance 1/1192 1,476,393 $ $ $ $ $ SPUC Increment 160,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Sale of Assets 30,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Interest 70,000 65,000 25,000 5,000 Total Revenue 260,000 270,000 230,000 210,000 205,000 205,000 Expenditures per List 490,000 919,400 449,500 449,500 505,300 493,100 Excess (Deficiency) (230,000) (649,400) (219,500) (239,500) (300,300) (288,100) Carry Forward - Dup/(delay) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Balance Available $1,246,393 $596,993 $377,493 $137,993 ($162,307) ($450,407) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Administration Copier 20,000 20,000 subtotal 20,000 0 0 20,000 0 City Clerk subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 Inspection Truck 13,000 subtotal 0 0 0 13,000 0 Finance subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 Legal subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 Community Development GIS/CAD station 10,000 Automobile - Pooled 12,000 subtotal 0 10,000 12,000 0 0 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Police Replace Squad Cars 31,500 32,000 33,000 34,000 35,000 Automobiles (unmarked) 16,000 11,500 12,000 12,500 13,000 Portable Radios 9,000 9,300 9,600 Mobile Display Terminals 12,500 subtotal 60,000 43,500 54,000 55,800 57,600 Civil Defense Radio Control Units 16,500 17,000 17,500 subtotal 16,500 0 17,000 0 17,500 Fire Truck - Pumper 260,000 260,000 Truck - Telesquirt 350,000 Truck - Aerial 550,000 Hazardous Material Suits 7,000 Air Pak 4.5hr. 10,000 Truck Grass Rig 35,000 Portable Radios 5,000 5,000 Scuba Gear 6,500 Rescue Boat Replacement 9,000 Pagers Mobile Data Terminals 10,000 Hazardous Material Kit 5,500 Utility/Personnel Vehicle 28,000 Rescue Tool 5,900 subtotal 569,900 45,000 366,500 305,500 260,000 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Engineering Car/truck 13,000 10,000 Theodolite 13,000 Computer Workstation 10,000 Blue Print Machine 10,000 subtotal 10,000 13,000 10,000 10,000 13,000 Street Single Axle Dump Truck/equip 70,000 70,000 60,000 Loader 90,000 Grader 130,000 Street Sweeper 120,000 Screener for Sweepings 28,000 Tree Clamp for Loader Bobcat w/Attachments 44,000 Side Broom 39,000 Alley Grader 60,000 subtotal 130,000 278,000 160,000 83,000 60,000 Shop Gas Pump Card System 25,000 Upgrade UG Fuel Tanks 75,000 Infrared Scope 20,000 subtotal 45,000 0 0 0 75,000 Park Large Mower - Jake 43,000 Large Mower - Jake 45,000 Gang Mower 8,500 Top Dresser 8,000 Truck 1 ton stake 25,000 Weed Sprayer Turf Sweeper 15,000 Trailer 10,000 Tractor 18,000 subtotal 68,000 60,000 16,500 18,000 10,000 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Recreation subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 Pool subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 List Total $919,400 $449,500 $636,000 $505,300 $493,100 Carry forward/(Delayed) Total 0 0 0 0 0 Sewer Fund New Jet Machine High Pressure Jetter 45,000 '04 s~ >1oo • r) -P tr x (1) 4J O H Z -H 3 0 RS O Z O U M -3 O O 4J o rn U -H O RS ,.0 -P off a) •PH a) cd 4-1 Z a) (1) A S. - U)ro ' ° 4J H0 .elCdU) 0a) Eno ° � � u) 0ti)( uu) 4-3) NwZ TUU -) 4-3 5+ RS -H RS u) Z M +) v b' a) 3 H a0') U U) .p •H U) Ll ri H °i 4 a > " •H '0 C • a) a) °a U 0 �,ri �, r' �, U �, 'CS U 4j o ° 0 ° t� ocno ¢, C -HRS CO.H O 0 rd Rs a, •.-i •� a) a 75 0 � c0 WCd ) CAH Cd 030 , Sa H C ' RS a) Q) O 0 Cd a) H w0Z CD H9a) U) 4J rci 0 H u) •H $4 a) O+•H ' a) 4i 01 ..i a) X33 .1 0' ti) ;-I 00 4-) a)rd ,� 0 ( W 0 m zH 'Li Zi a) a) a) CN SC - 4-) w (1) ¢'' c U .�J U Q., , -H 4-) ° O a) 01 +.3� ar aUC - U "-I •n R • . a) a •, U) T3n RQmW RS ° Sc A.,QM UOOO .HCaO+4jin. , � _1 (CS CO a -P co ) rOCdU° ° O a)P. P CA oU 4 Oa+ aOW -.--1 O ° S H aW ,ZS 0 aaiC � 0 .m � 0 a. a) a) _' a) � a) � No 04 >, 0 "r1 cA ° io Uo N oao 2 '"4arc$ WQ1O 4 O L 4-4 p U � ° 0 ` 0 El � A � ¢+ O >1W p, � H H A RSP cd o U -P -W _p 0' H 4-) . 4) O„ U CO a-' CdN ( •H H O (t3 ,Q O RS to bZ • A U ro s~ H r� N S c a z A -4-) 'c3 RS 4 7:1O -P GI '� O1 N a) Q U s~ a) 4 f2, .k 'LS .i..) •H ' .0 U) rr-i U S� N o > Q4 4 ?, a o f RS 4-) HCH >~ WH H0 U ax . C) • = A 04-i-i C U4- a) z-P O • a 0H ( 4-) o,. 4- r•4 rd O H .H RS +) x Rt a) U 4j a) U •H g O o U y s�, U) a) 1-.1 3 Cd 0 01 •ri 0 \ Cli •r1 i-1 -Hi Cr) -H co •H b Cd C H RS H a '—I A (1) 0 4.) 4) - C u) 3 ZS 04JOa , a) N H o OA R; U) N a) C) 4 -H O a) Z C O 0 U > C7 U 4J I P+ HCr) A 3 4-) $-iH H O 4) 2 CdX •. .• $-4 lD d' in M +) C (1 +-) O1 0) 01 U) Ol r--i a) -H 01 01 01 .r-1 H 0 U Z H H a) H 0 H 0 -H > RS CO -H 4-) C. . H 'O •H -H (1) 0 O o c a C a (4.4 U) 'd U) a-) • a) O a) -P O U) (1) N 'd ro a) • p .r.1 (d H •r•1 a) •'•1 •P H (d O 0) 0 0 O r-+ O 0 H H 'd (d 3 ••-I a) (d N 4J N 0) (T '0 H >~ U) 'd (d a • H 'd H cd •H a) 4J ..I p .r.1 >~ z Sa •r.1 • 0 a) >,4 - Sa H •,-1 (d a) RS (d • O a) O o s H ro H O a) O > a1 a) p > S 1 A Q) W -r•1 +) O o H !~ Sa r1 x f~. (d m H a) • a) 0 0 -P U O 4-; U) o ` (d cd z 0 .Q -•4 U) C H 4 4--) )4 H "-+ • Sa >, 'N +) a) a RS w• Hro 3H � (d � (I) .0 >iO a5 0 Z RI U > o 0 amNc' n 001 01 C) (0 _ a) U) a) a+) -P ct +� -r� N 0 v} p O A U N 0 A (d S-I • •1-) a) (d 0 H ?, >1-P 0 O A U • '� S-+ 4.4 U ncl (d �•) (d o .r.1 2 a) • -I w O., ° U A (d +) -P 4J .P N w ro U o N FriU Sa 'O 3 3 •t•) o •r-1 Z Uro H U (d Z (11 UI LS a) w 0 o a) rd .r.1 'd 0 Sa 0 ro Q O (d 6 a) 3 •'-1 O 0 H to Sa a) > 0 +) 'd -r04 ;4 UOC] (lS01op 000 -° a+.) •n In 0 as 00 a) •H 0 co 0 A 0 O 0 a) 4 >,'� +_ '� p., S°+ O O N 4 O a Sa 0 rd M o s~ U) . a) w -H �, 0 Q ,.._1 .r.1 a w a) a) 0 'd ° o4 0 s,rci 3 0 'A0 Cd r-1 U U ao .H •H 1n N o pBUJ o 0 Q 0 $-4 -P o o a) U .NZ a) (r) (4-4 +� t •H � z 4 10) +) .N N o 'd (d - 3-I ).4 U) U) y 1 .� - -I U) z ro (d 0 -P .r.1 Ul U > Z U) s~ 'd 0 -H O A a > U U7 .H b'''l 1-1 a) ••-1 0 w .+~ 0 >~ '0 (d (d a) ,C 0 a) 0 r0 a) o �''0 Sa O A (d µ.a .0 0 Sa 0 w1 .•H1 +) o 3 01'0 m U) 'd +P m a) +) A rd A (d }4 H is CI a) 0 a) -r-1 0-1.--I (s U) U (4-4 'H 0+ H 0 .H in a-) o (d 0 0 a) Sa > cdXA0 Sao+ �+ >1.HO � 0 NUte - 4-1 to a) Q, 0 .r1 .' H Cd •H i; -H S- -r1 0 a) 0 a) (4.4 U) 0 H a) '-1 U) p N Ul >1 U Cd pww Cd U) o •P c o N 3 0 +.) 4 o a) •r1 �+ Q ° o 'er -H O a) a) a) U) H U) 0, U) A U) .r.1 H U) a) w1 d) w '� o 3 H • W orO 3 A H (j)) H -P (d 0OCdWop H z ' •rI 0 0 4J -H N -H $- a) • 'd o 0 0 o A 'i -I a1 Hatt 3 � � •.1 � (n -P > Cd0r-{ -,-1 0 'OrnU rnoSa 0 ; a) ° 'O ° , t .�'� Ha) 0 .- (d H a) U) (3“1-i 0 N aU) W (daz 0 Uza ' p O 'd a) H w 4- CdbSa a 4 ' H ,:04 - SO R• o r4 o ° p4JNA mO 0 . > Z ° CU) Up U -crN �u) m aN O •4 a > � 0 -P 0 3 w Cd ' ooCOs . . z0m zX ° C0 CH rod U tri Z O W r1 a) •'-I •O a.) O� cn (d $ �a C O rn - W H 3 Ln ro O ID N )4 C ° `� (d w (rod !~ A N 0 .0 a) S-1 Z H Sa CI) -P f-( a) ra rd a) N O .z N ''1 4Ul 'd 4 0 g w (d U1 a 0 ?, >,, U 4j •rl 0, '� a) (d a � •ra � � -H (d '0 Ul 4 S+ (d co N ( 0 -ra Q) H 'd o04 (1) 0 (1) 07:5 oni '0 `� O N (d rd p Sa C2.4 a) (d H H CS) H H O •0 0 C) 0 a) ro O H Q 3 > a) W H (0 a 01 U) a) 0 N uI a) O -P H +) H o +n Sa 0(13 UI O co A 1ti U) H ,s~ rd g a) .r.1 > r-I N Q1 o U a) U) (d 0 • (d a) .H -H N (d 4J , O O O 0' O A A a) a) • 3 Z a1 -H 0 'd .� 0 Ti 0 'b >I �+ .r1 '� ro • ° a1 U -P o HHoa � Ud O A CI) -H -HCd a 0 O O ,--1-1 • 0 •rz 00. 1.4 >1HHUr_i H H 4 U U N >~ U1 N A H 4•) .r.1 'F, a) ~ •r 0 -H X o a -r 4.) co a Q , a) (d -H if)- U) > ,A 4J rd H d 4 () d a) A A cn 0 ¢ 00 a > a 'd ~ a 0 , a ( o a) U .H a) a) A , A Ix .4 a) U A .r 1 4 U ~ a) 4-.) r-4 "--1 CdN +00N + -'m - 'd a8 N L a) n � o u) g ) u) ° Cd o a . 0Ca, zd • )4a°) (c) �' Cd rCdL ,r 0 •u'i .H N Q .H 0 O 4 ci aoo ir' a) 4 4- aCi41 C) Cd Cd (d 0 0 A •- >, X A A ;-1 ,-{rQ, (d a S+ '0 U) a) +) A U o H + H H d ) ' a) X ,q H p 4 U) z -H 0 •r•1 q a) a) m U) >~ o a, H 'd v)- W (d N 'd a) o (d -H 0 .r.1 -H a) +) w (I) 4-) (4.4 U) 0 al UI 4- H 0 rn U) 0 a) H H -H O 4J rd A A 00 Ho (d a\ 0 .0 0 - H 0 )4 0 4J co H A •r•1 U) a-) •H (d a) -p a) - U) 0 -rd a) H r-1 a) 01 N 0 o CO 4J (d U) co (d +) A Z (d a) (s Sa ''1 (d a-) 0 > a Sa a S- --1 +) H >~ H 0 H 0 al .r.1 O O .0 P -H (d w •.-1 w 4 H a) •.-I O a) 0 0 •r-1 a) (d 4) H W a 0-1 (..) r-1 (1) 3 Z U +J (d 'd KC Ul H a-) -•+ +-) a U) (d U w 3 )4 --I cc x P+ m m H N 000 � . 00 4J - O � 0 � � RS 0 (0 0 . P • 0 Q U cd ,-i LOo RSH aC RS 0 .g A U) 1/40 4 ,Q U H H U) RS H H l U) a a 0m 04m R• H o OW as Cd as ' o4 a.0 AW U) AW cd 0 H U) U) H °) Q 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 '0 Q, 03 03 O RS RS 0 0 0 0\ .� Qa N 0 0 +)ai 0 H 3 c 0 N 0 z. ko z U) > U) x • 0 0Nu • • PU'0 � Z0 N rn A o) H H 40 -,-i0 U H 01 , H d S 3HH ' 0 z >r -. > 00 -,-1 g , g 0 H 0 •,..c g H R A '� 0 �'' H 0 0 H o w '0 4 '0 (/) -H U) 3 P 0 0 0 tU1) • >14J U) 0 0 0 COU) C 0 ( 0 0 0 Cd a) A 4) U) Cd A 0 U) 0 U) > ZS U 0 0 0 RS U cd g 0 O 4.) 0 P 0 • 0 H O 3c 0 .0 0 0 H 4J 4 'H P O o 4 41 -P 4 0 0 0 0 W A 0 �+ Q, 0 o 0 Cd 0 Q, CO S-+ RS 0 RS '0 0 0 0 O to Ca •H '0 O • H H Ca •H 0 04-1 U) Cd H 0 U) a-) Q Q, Qi H i-1 U) }1 H H H 0 4 .0 0 0 0 H 0 RS 0 U) 0 • (a Q+02- •H Cd 0 RS H S-1 U) 1 I •H $-1 U 0 0 RS • 0 0 > 0 0 0 1a • > 0 H 3a 4 4J •H 4J O O S-1 S-1 RS 0 -'•( a-) H 0 •H 4-) RS• H '0 RS U U) r-1 4) H > Ri U CT RS U U) 0 U .Q 0 S-1 i s RS 0 co 0 a) 0 TS 0 RS P RS 0 °) H A Ud) -P 0 0 0 H 0 +) U 0 0 H O Qp Cd >y'r{ + ) Q RS m S 1 M Q p CO Qa CO M C co -P `d a CO 0 RS 0) 0 w 4 $.4'0 to g 0\ 0 01 S-1 U) S-1 0 0) a 0\ 4) i.4 U) H 0 H 3 H - . 0 0 3 H 0 H 0 0 +) aG 4-)a) �,`° � � U) �' 0 4 N a) a H `SHA a� RS• 0 RS °) • g O U] H 0 RS 0 U RS 0 g O U) -P H to H U) .H 0 rd RS RS H U RS H U .rl m 'si Q, H Qi P g ,C 0 H Q, H Q, g• 4 0 0 Q., 0 0 i•,1 4-) 0 E-i Q, 0 Q+ 0 p 1- U 04 a 0 a VI -H 3 0 ( U(24 2 Ix a 72 0 H O W U Q, 0 0 0 O Q4O U) i•1▪ • 1-1 'd O U) r-) • i•4 b • f-1 'd U) H O-I Q, X Id U) MI Id Q Q. -H Cl) ld (0 U) 10 0 g Q� a) RS >i a) ¢O Ol E-+ 1-1 0 a 1..1 U OG m 0 01 0 U b U -0 w �+ (tiId W r0U -1 > U ' 'd m m -H - U b m C 'd m w m m H 'd g00La m H m H q Oa) � ,ea H ,x A 0 4 ,Q -P H ,4 A H x A A $•1 0 i-1 b -H H .0 0 $-1 cd 0 i•1 10 H "i ,. O fa Id � 3-1 •ri tf) .1-) 0\ i-1 C +) i-i 10 -1) •H N � 4 O H a) O 4 0 is > 01 •H -H a-) 0 to 1) 14 > 0\ •H 0 g H 1~ O Al g O RS •rl 01 1~ 0 R! 0 0 Id 0 •ri 0) S 0 •H •H • a q P0 U H x a q a a D Pi O H N El 3 +) H •• I N Q 01 01 0) 01 01 01 ml g CA H H H -H H 'CS H 0 -H )-1 g -H W ci+ >, ) $-1 $a L0 w 4-4 P PU) 0 >, 4 >-, .IJ H 01 a) 0 -r1 U) 0 o a) a) a) a) d U) a) U {) H .r♦ +- -04-1 AH I A A4, OH > -H 4.) 3 WH H 40 0 • 0 0 3 0 3� Ri O 3 a) cd '0 -H g RSH RS 1a U) (f) '0 a, o w P O -P rd '0 0 > A 'd 0 rd a , C45 � wZ o 0 CN L 415 $a i a) U04 In > p H Ti) r-1 al A U ¢' U Ul !�-� V] Ul 4) A U) a, a) a) Has w u) cn 1a a) RS A U) •H Q1 + a' cd 0 7,.i4O d P t ° >~ >, O d a 0 O rd aO m •r -H i a, N ro Ts a) 4) as O O z rd rd .,.i 4J 4J '0 04-P Z d' a) 4) 0 is 0 cd 0 > > H A H a) a) O a) •r1 dP U) a, rd H td IA a) H (da) Ry a) A a) .4 ..i 4--) g -H ,--1 ..1 r-1 N w 4..) : 4--1 .,40) .>p .,--1 'dm .,:a) go 4: rn 44 M 0 O W 4 .H U) a) ° U) al a) . 1 H ) H 4i 0:1 4 tii O ° -H00 ° 4J 0 cd 0 0 W Cd U '0 a) 4 M .raj P U) $4 4-+ •- - RS H d H ,d a) U W tT a) b a) O O C � 1aw 3 0 3 U Ud' •H .� � `- m 0 +� a) H > H a) a) 4J U) a) C A a) ° ° •r1 ,d U) „� a) > TA O 4J 0 RS O U > w a) RSP MA .r♦ 1a C) U) 0 H 40 d H v +� > a) � cd a) 'd a H 0 .� 4) .,..4 5:1, mrd a)Ti as .oar 0 'd O 2°I , 0 r�1 � >~ o � �as 0 � � U) O U1 U A U) ,, 1a U E� Sai o 3 N a) 04 W U) Z U) .0 � X4-1 0 • c Q -P p � � U ° -0 s~ Aw '0 0 •H 3 H Z P an U RS 0 0 a) -P O RS ri 0 CD U) H 0 ' H w 0w 4) 4' • P 0 0 a) o � � � cu ..o U) � • a) mrd U 0 0 z a � A 0 ° CD . 4j 4 g U U) f'a 44-) •r1 4 •H r-1 4J a, �4 4>�, g .� a) � 0 •0 •4- 4 O • H a) E-4 Vi K4 3 E� 0 RS 1a Oa ri U D 0 0 d' U) 4. UI N U H • 0 N (". () a >i Id r4 R1 •H •rl Z H is i H L" rWI 71 U) C: • O • ° . >-, a) •r1 a) +� 4 .> U 0 0 •rl U1 O 0 +0 • r-I '� . �" ° >1 a) U) >~ H 0 rd -H 4 Ord -H O U • 1 O a, '4-1 ° RI•H • Hoo • A C cd'd aa) U z -4 4 Q a) Ul 0 ° � 0 +) Ei a) 3 b �d0 � 4-1 H '" •r1 •r1 -Ii � o ,� UO1aOrafd l (d r0j, o � •� to -r♦ CO o 4J +) cd a) U a) m +) • $•I a� U ,,a a) •0 C) \ U 0 (0 A ° C 0 1a \ N U)• 0 H rd4JH U) A l H $-+ U) a) 1 a) 3 4) OW D+ N ?4 O a) 0 cd td Cd A a) a) > C) rd a) C) •H '0 A Q 4J al rd a) 0 -'-4 C) 0 A (1) b ,. 0 0 0 x •-1 0 4J H I-+ 4) •r1 1a a r.0 s~ M A -r.1 1-1 a) ,-I o $4 Rs +) RS - I (1) U 0t11 04-1 -H MO ri Q) cd W d U H a) •r1 •r1 O 4) td 1.1 (1) 4-1 U) 0 s~ U) cd U N •r1 7-1 a, 1a 0 0 a,4- A rd 4a S-1 a) a0 0w X -1ai aU) 04 U) 0 a H a 0w x 0 4-10 g o H4 40 04.0 X -H M 01 01 01 0\ CI) H H H H H a) >-,"0 to a) a-) • to +) 0 01-P O N a) N O u) u) 'b i s tp > al 34 0 0 O 0 O +) s~ 0 3 � co 0 •�1ra (1) 4-) a) O w a) d U •r-I M 4) •,-1 ra) '0 . U •kk w w > •Crn H 3 'D Q) O � 0lO - a k 4 0a 'Ei O td0\ U a) 0k (-) k -1-, tdaswa) b' 0 tC ¢, Ucd 0 H o a) b 't a) H coH H J+ � O N Ha) aU 0 a, '0 Cd a • 0 O v O •r•1 5 ,70 b' . a) a) td u) 'd a) a) s~ +) Ca U to O U O -H a) 0 'LS > O (7 H )4 RI N ''1 a) to a) N 'b •r-I 0 o -� N 'b u) 0 r- 01va � 1 !~ , a H a) a, • td a) CO 0 4 to 0 w a, s~ •.-� Ei Uta O U) 4J 0 td a) k N O 4-) 3 k a) N 4 O k a) 4 r-i a) ,� Q) ra O 'O 0 a) 4) > a) O a) t) O • o > a) r � 0 ° MZai (1) 7,1> • � o ; °) P >, a) - o U) U) .,-I td .P -H 0O-+ U) b' Z as -H 4 td H a •'� • E+ rI E+It b) 0a 0. u) H a) � > 0 •.1 OJCD T a) 'x O O t~ 4,1 '� a) to Cd �+ > • 1 • Q (03 a) a) 4) a. 3 . o 'ZS cd 0 O U• 'O 3 k �0 0 a) 4 N w +, .-4(1) N rn -H to a) ro a) o 4 a, O cd O U ), to rs U U) !~ �, O 0a, 0. Ca + ^ O p O � � ra Z 30 �� a) � N 4-) a) OO °) '� waa� >~ , � N � A -H 0 !, (a a) -HN w N H N tt N rl O r+ fd 4-4 0 O h U) > N ?+ rd ,...1 a) ,• � 'O 0 U • > U] rn cc3 a) f a O O k O ,Q rd .. • rd U H 0, -HO o '� •r-1 rd `, a) a) a, O H td O to ¢ U] ++-I +) � H a +i H 'H ' .0 to t i 4.4 0 O s~ U uOi 3 N ?+ N . O A co rH O �+ 0 asa., to .n 0 w � 0 Ha, �1 0w X p75 1n r 30 o R' I 'O 0 0 w to N +) 0 >~ o O to H ?+ U1 O `� U a+ o 0U to40, 000, 0) 0H0 z a O 0 cd co O r•-I rd •'1 p ,) H 0 -,a 0 H '0 O is +� .� 3 41 a) ro -r-I >~ .r., wr0 3 '� _p aa)) •HCd C 0u) r H 4Jtn .bal au) o � U •HPa) � a Q) N 0 k 0 0 •1 Cd U k O b 0 O O p., ..... 3 N • ' 'H 4-) o R, a) a, -H o a) 4 .,-� O '0 o rya to • 0 rd U +) �+ t +) rya a) ,-� U N -H0 a) 0 m . o4 .� +i 0u) y� b,. Ei0toF 'H El 3 3 U ��Otn 4 >1 4 � 3N 0 � 41C a) • 0 0 E-1 N H � i3O to b- i a) uu) a 3 0 O gH coN .14s 7:1 P N 0 -,-1 � S- ''rO .kZ • aa • H • +t -H 0 U . a) , OU O OaNO $. at-t 0 ?, O U) OM > OZ O daOM o co 0 � oC0H � U O w � 0 00zNu) >-+ 4Z4 � 0 (0S C tordZ H O -Ha} Ua O0H ~ CI 4) a, E Z U a) ter 5 -H ¢4 w -H al b) -r I • (1) rd Z O a•) •'-i N 0 Z rd to 3 b 0 }a +) ra 'O w •-1 O 0 O . • co •ra •,i +) >ti U) a) I 'i N l '0 • I b a) al U) o) 0 U O ,--1 a) rn t'a rd A b' a) > 0 a.) a) to u) ca 4j rd ON rd 0 -1 O U O 0 H H a o >~ O a) g rd -H x > Q) g o r) N H U 01 O a, b to 4 U ›-i-,--4 •'-i U) U U O 0-,+) U 0 'O O --1 L." r-1 > +) •r1 rd O a) to r-1 0 w 0 a) to 0 >~ >~ M 0 +) Q) to H 4-) N U a) 0+ 0 4 0 to rd •'a 'b O 0 H 0w 14 EA k 0,N H 4J44J Cddr '0a0-) '0 txU4J > -rHa HA 3 '041 •• •• •• N •r{ mcr in rn to rn rn rn rn N rn rn rn H a) H H H -H, CA Sa W +) w N S-( N N '0 G '00 O 4i N .0 ,g . ro U a) ,. z o •-+ a) 'd of 3 r•1 4 .Q -P ca 3 � � � P a) 4-) S�+ .s2 g g 0) N Z4Jtf z ?i $ Sa Sa •o 4.) 0 x O 0 XI N O O N N 'U N N td a) S+ 0 ?+ 1~ ro 04 U N CO 9 ,U Q) o• a) •n 0 al 0 � � Q) z •¢+ N Q) 4 � Q' O � 0 al '0ro N -P co tr N r� g 4-1cd w E� U N O 1- rd a) H -r-I '� N • a) 4J C •to .n 0 N is ro�f .� a) �' ) •U) Uro • - 'd N roN g 3 � 0 O +� U +� >C cd Sa O 04 in Q) TA -Haig 0' N 0 0 . ) .� H -P a) � ro • s.4 w a QH 3 U O ?, 0 C25 ci, 3 0 ra p Q) Sa a) N 0 0, • V rd• N z g -H '1 S-+ N 0 O Q) OH N 0 0 tn tn N Fa) N N f. O Z a) Q:(CS � � C a) N H Q) HH Q) N Q) O • rd f~ H rH-i a+ }I H w tT a) 0:1 w 3 • ai �, ai U) W 3 >i `� Sa (d '� H tU) 04 o •H N a) Q) Q) N .. •rl -r1 C) '� H-I w 3 ? O ro H x b -P al +� N ,� +) o U U -,-1 (d ( (d U) H t3' (d w Q) •,� ty) Q) '� N N Nfts �O Sa 01 4 4 -P 4 W N b r� Sa .�, O C) ro Sa O o z ro0 Q) S-1 �y 2 N • Sa O ni x U +) (d tT f~ o• O N r0-I a) 0 s~ 0 .0 UI N 0 .J .i" H tr U ( Z O O -H 0 O° k -r-I N ro p O• 'i -, O Ea U .4 P c O N -P •Hin- Q) Q)5.4 LA , a) N 4fnig -P • Sa � o o w U SOH W ro � N 3N •H 4- U Q) OH ,a', U a) SIH • H 'U O CO S i Sa a) Sa 0 r� W N N a) , H rn 0 3 -P o O (d N Hn. g rn U) z U 0,H y rd O ?+ O U, • rd w O w N •� U �' - ro W w0 .73 p 4.3 -P -H U .,x.( .H Q) g ,4 b -H >i 0 tun OI► Qf 0 C W `V -3 U 4J r� U) U QI (d •rl Q) a) 'UNH H r4 0• •H .,.� s~ X ro v N of H cd U U U F H w H a) H V 0 � .�) 0 0 21 0 O N Sa 2 N .4 0 N, co U • p O U oj N &4 «S ," a) 'd +) H �, -H 0 a) 4 •H 'd td C U U (0 a) U 4.1 >1 a) w U �' 01 N fa 3 p ?+ r-I 0 H .S: a) 0 •H O O C 14 w H S.4 •ri Q) 0 -1 g cd E-♦ rd rd 'U N .a) w (dH -Al '� Q) Otyl O 3 -H a ,w-{ �, ro N k 4J -H Lil 0 0 Ei ,Qj 3 rad Q S-i CZ E--( ,lU.' � H-I 4) p O -H � g4.) 0 .H H 0 b rd .H - ;-1 ,--4 • coro is Uw (d - N xcdj i (d +J .H O � � cd -H Q) � H ,� Q) Z •3 4) rd U a) g -H +) o $.4 O g tr (� .c +' 'r+ US to Qf Sa S i �; 4 tr 4 O N N A a) � 4J H Sa (dH 4 0:1 -Hal 4 0 1U,' to CS W +3 rd t1, b S( N H ?+ rd rd Q) H (1) g (d O .0 OW U Q) O +.) • Q) rd -H O Q) 0 tT H a) Sa 'U > Q) 0 0 W O of +.) Sa ro Q: H N3 Q) V 4 CD U -H -Al H Q, g Sa .4 Sa N N N 4-) Sa 4 O rd a) N O •H 7 0 W H 4 -H CA 3 4 O rd tr H tr Q) •H rd P to aro to 3Z o U 4W N cam) rn rn rn rn 01 0101 61 HH a) a) V N x4-3 0 )4 a) x 4) 0 .4 +-3 'd >, A 0 '0 oa) d ,� U 0 0 -P r -P -P s~ � U -P g a 'd U •r4 0 RS •H •H cd 0 a) g u) >1 .Q. 0 0 3 0 +� 0 3 0' N 0 -) r0 H ori 0 is 3 O U 4 + r� � o~� c'ad U 04 co H rid 'U a 0 a) � -H 0 g � 01 a) cd S4 MI 3 :1, � 3 O H 04 U) u) U H a) $-4 C.) O U o -H O U U O u) tr Ho � -P 3 3 >ia) � 4j 0 3 01- > 4 al ccf� rI 3 0 0 `- 4-3co 3 U) in •P ..''d -P (c)a) U) Q 4-3 In 4 ",--1H a)co -P a) 0 coN r a) co H M U) -H0 A I~ •`� Sa U U) 0 H U N H rI -rH•I H •rcs U•I >i 4 d > aSa O �G 0 U O 'd W trU U N 0 W H o0,, rd a) O R' U Q a) 4 Sa u"I UU) U O �+ 3 U) 0 a) a) is 4 0 -Hi w a) o rd 0 0 U - S-c U SaCD Sa 0 0 td 9+ U 0 C) a) rd a) a) rd a) O 0 r• a) is U U 4 Sa a, cd as 4..r S . A 4 S 0 a m 0 >~ mi cd -,-i rd O rn Ei O • ai ti) 3• 0 -P 0 "r{ E' O 40 0-1 co-I ?+ U �. Ei 0 4 U) r-I N 'd rel 4 "H g o N P a) a) H O • N 0 g•'- U) Q .Q 0 C H o a) oo -a A 3 •� •ri ate) -�A +) 'd a Z IV 0 0 . ,J ,J o g, Mn 0 U �' > &H Ti -H 0 a 0 N �, 4 � •0 Hai 0H ' a MS � a) (nN � sa m a 0 � U 'd0 U E-, X o0 43 Qa) � 0U 4-3 4 � o a) RI a) o R, •-r 0 a) z 3 4-1 -d ' 0 � $a CO W H �' Cd -P 4-) oSaa) m 3U � md0 Nm 3o N � N al N CO O-,0 O ( k rd d N 4 +) p 4) O O 4-4 A ca '0 O t'i in S� �i-H a) W U) R o U) CO U U � UI .� Cd 0 N N a) O 0 ca > A a) is d U rd o4 r0 S c E4 rd 0 E4 CO a) 9r b Sa r-I U) . 0 � Q a) U r--I 'd 4J Q R+`H id C) rd (1 Q) W Z NW 04t-1 rI Q tr al fd --4 rd a' U) E- j (d 00 �4 Al 0cn 04Cli C 0) ..1 U '0 cdrd N -H . aa) 'd 0 - - - 3A -P Ow -4-3 -rI +) HU � o fi m 'd Cd O 4 . ' U a) rd .0 U) - � -r•I a-) CO 'd U a) 0C7 4-3 CO ---^ w is a) 'd Sa >~ '� >~ � +) U) 0 '� 4 CA U Sa Z O U) rd 'd Q) 0 4) ri* tr k rd •'") s~ 'd .,-4 m el —4 ( b z 0 d •a)I � > c •� k - � > � H > UN -r>-I 00 >, 044-1 +) U CD Saa) 0 -P a) � 4dcag g .11) ,C2 Sa0Z Cd -H rd RS . 0 rI 'd rd U . •H A i-4 'd td � -H 0 4-4 o rd >4 a) 0 'd is a) 4- ON g O cd O ,h4 4 m rI tr >~ N Q 0 (4-4 0 +-) 4J rd cd ?, 0 'd g cd A +) S a S a >~ 'd rI A rd w -•-4 'd 4) 0 N0 > ZR, a0)�nao) EE--c 'U c�nm co° dP O co3 tote HQal a -rHH Ito N M rn CS) CI rn rn CA rn H ri 4-4 41 R 0 4 Cn 'd . O a) N 4) Q) - N O 1-1 N W Z 1-1 U N a) H fa H a) b - U U Sa 0 -H a-) is N •r•1 .Q a) •r-1 O o o U .,-1 0 d M (1) H 0 0 N N (ti Cd (CI a•) 0 Mrn 00 •.- W g 4J0 03 CU 03 � � � 00 S 4-) U Sa 01 N H -P 4..) +) M N 4.) N trl-r1 to ° H H a) N as >r z H O a ) al Q., t3I +) O 0 +- •ri 0Q O U H a) O r♦ N Cd O O D U Q) >' N H 3 3 U � > z a (i) b $4Hw +P 01 .0 Cd 05, rts a) N 0 U 'd N • C 'd• 0 0 Cd O 'd ° Q) -P a) > N d is N o rN-1 O U z 0 1~ p H O' Q, O H cd cd a) 4) a) S-1 1, 0 al N N a) H a -P 4-1 O O � Q) a) H rn as +' cOO 4 C) o o .4 444 w - 0 0 g �•r0-1 -P >.,Ts 0 N � � p 0 w N O N ON a) a) al M U N H O O N 0 w O so k O Q +C .H t/°) N A p Cd 'd 'd +� 4 U ° H O4-1 ° H Q N H +� 4) 'd W 4) A O� Q) N 5, r-1 -P Q) > N QNj N H N O' cd N ° 4 � a) O •r+ � 3 CdN 3U .� O •r1 NSa O, U N _ U 0 - N >~ �+ N 00 $-1 f3� Id ° '0 ("1 U 'd N 04 x 01 0 '" 4 3 3 O U75 c) R+ I N � a) •tea-) X � O 0 U f� Q 3 R �, N f�� w � as a) d, ° U N . O •,40 En Q) +) t,w 3 N �'r_i ¢'+)-P 0 • N rd U q '� rd 44 t5, m N ro a)' d O $• 1 Q) °.' Q) 0 . '� ( UU Q) -P •H 4 •rQ z oH rU U s .-0 Cd it Cd E *-- .H , 7:5000 N ° 0 R O C5' 0U ° '� aZ1d 'd a) w O0cd � •Q � .�0 NU � SaCd ° .0 aU Hcd H NHO0 4.) � 0 � • , H ° O O td W 0:5 N O C) a N •0 ° gr-1 •rQN -ra .~ 0 A - N 0 '"1 HQ '' N pa al • H 0H N 4j" N CO N g1" + aO 04 W cz� 0 C14 �' x � W •� ° �' �' ;-1aM a) a) 3 al o ° •1 � � `� a) is O 3N - 4) 14.4 01 ° H O 0 U aQN N 0 H a [ 75QIdU 0 3 ?+ '� OWcd " aJ (0 'd N -,-1 H Sa Q Q ° ¢, O O Sa +) a) a) ° N U 'd Q N 4) 30 30 (n Ad fzi N u 3 4 H RS N W RS N p aG 3 O cd Cr) 0+ 1-1 a) 'd N .z Or4 -H b 4 U al Q) U) N d ° O 4j d,�O a) .0 N N W RS 0 0O CD Q 0CU CUa C ' U H ai a) d Q ., a w .-1 N .Q -H H `� o � td 1-4 'd N N a) H S-, a) O O W S-1 •r-1 0 ty1 O O O O N O E-4 ,Q -1 -H •r-1 -H N U t>Y 01 -'d U 'd O O p 'CS U •r-1 a) S-1 a) 4.) 1.4 N Sa •'-I a) a) -O - R1 0 N E O S-1 • a) N • a-) N R, N a) +) 4J O d Q a) O (4-4 'd > td -LI) ,..1 -r1 Q4 O (1) is X (1) Z W g Q) -r1 Q) 0 •H -P 01 0 'd Q U W a) O a) LC) c.1 Q3i 3 N a) O 1.1 S 1 • -r1 1-1 (1) 0000C) 00 Rcd0 •H0 .QSar WOO s~ S40 •r-1 ed RI -,-1 It 0 (Ci 3 -P N +) >a V'd Sa U D Id 'd CO CO -- a i~ U O Qa Z 4-) a 51.--- g E Qa N •ri N CI ' rn Is rn Ir Ir Is H H H ro i4a U) OTS A tT •0 a) a) U) QO )-1a) • OOU •r-1 -P O O Q a 'LS U H a) A (1) A H Q 4J 4 W Sa O 0 - •1 •r1 •r1 7:5 4-) ':1 4J a) al -P > .S:ZZ U) is O > > 4-) 'd •04-) a) )-i CO a) g •0 U) 0 -H O Z O .� 4J r l 4- E U) b tr u) al Sa (1) M (I) Q a) .Q RI a •r4 aJ a) Q U) 4) -,-40 •n•r1 a) O a) Q4--1 •r"1 S4 S4 r-I a) r-1 .H U) g 4- Sa U 3 +i as Z p MI 4-+ lap 43 4 Z U o N H 0) 0 0 a'� Q � -H •r1 rd U U) Q+ -r•1 a 0 Q+ U) )..1 -(8 O r>a ,Q 0 Z 3 z o k p H N rd Ts a) 0 rr-, a) Cd ''� Cu' o w �+ ,°-1 0 co O U (1) RS h `0 '0 +) $a cd O U Q+ ori 4-' Ul W Cd U .n a 4 UI OZ ti U O P.41-1 H � 't3 k U) S4 O W z U) rid a) ▪ CU 0 W U a) 0 3 s~ $-1 v H U rd H to 0)-HI r-1 'Q C Z W 4J 4-1 4-01 P m U N Soo -p H U) (0• -1-) ctn a u) U � � it 4, u) U s� `� a) '0o 0QA a) A - � ,~ w. ,4 � UUU)) � 30R, )-4AA U) H aiH to � OQ, w � 3 NH � +� o ,� 4) 4-) A •H o Z3 0 '� o a) tv a) as is Z a) -H � Q•1 (a cC) N Qa a .n 4, U) A H •r-1 al a) a) (04 is a) u) 0 U) (0 .� 0 •W zS -P H A 3 N Q Q '� 0 S1 x O w U U) }..1 U) 4-) -H to U) Sa z a O U U) 0 3 U O r1 a Cd .r1 O C Z A CI) • 0 4+ U a) 0 -Cd o v •r�1 NAA U a) � -p ( � H a) 'a) U (0H E1 ?, Cd S i U Z is •4 0 .r1 3 H 'CI �. H r-1 x i .,�.1 a a) tr4- 3U) • 0 3 -3 • 00a) asa 4-) > • U) 0 't3 Cd U) O O a N 0 4 A 3 ' .� z ca -H U) c.) Sa H A 0 -r� S4 u) O r4 .r.1 .L: Cd v C �' a) O C to 4-) 4, Cd o 4-' t3' m •r•1 r.1 al A U) Sa u) H CL, -r•1 .r.1 0 CU 1 H N H +) a) � � � •r13 � • ani U) --I � 'CI (CS hw ,� � � `� .� zx •r-1 N In � u) Z > • W ta N 4-) t5' N +) a).., U 4, A N Q CO 0 Q U u) -H aai 3 a) . a) $ b o 0 H O Q) U Mtn 0 +� a) a) > to A 'O U 4 0 W -H 0 U) H tCd ca F�-I •rQ-1 k a �' rd r, o 4 1 ?, •ri El -,-.1 p.4 CU Qu) 3U X s�4N � �' Uo �' a�73 Cd• to '0 4) Q a) U 0 r6 m n a) A A to 3-1 rd 0 •r-1 oi •r•1 rd CD 4_ 3 ca 3 U n.,..1 •r 1al'b Cd O td 30 r-1 -P a) A 4 0 N - 0 O a) Q a to s.4 � U � �1 4-3 U) ' a) 4.4 H U) q 4� as 4.J Zs r-1 Cd 0 0 -r1 0 H 0 to x •H 'CI 4 0 4a ••i o is 4) '0 Q, .( 0 tU o q H >~ (1) 171 a 0 'd t7I W A a) •H U Ul to a) 0 -P -1 a) Q -r.{ •r1 rd 4-) 3 Q Z 4a Q+ 0 4-) 4 • • CM Ul >r N --1Z 4-) u) a) tr 0 al al Z 4-1 >y 1-1 CO 0 0 $.4 >i 1-1Q4 •,-1 4, A o g a) is • r-I a ) .r.1 (1) 4) a0 Gq -r1 0 .Q W H g •r1 4- •r1 O M g cd -r1 r-1 (1) ra •H 4-) 4-) H U •r1 A Q a) 4-) 4- O •'- g 4-) td •r•1 0 4- O U) 44 H H -r1 O a) •r1 •H A 0 0 ,Q O •r1 4-4 A 4J U 4-) S-1 f-1 •H r4 Q+ H 'd td 4-i td 4-) !-i -r1 -n Ti a) Sa 4- i 0 • LI)l 4-) a) o A OP, 0 '0 S-1 --I x4 >~ tC A C 0 C 'ts (1) -r•1 0 r-1 U ••-I H ,Q 4.) 4a 4-) to rd a 1d E-t H H aS �. 3 0 4s to cd Ca a+ 3 S4 .Q � a r 0 0 c� to rn rn a) H 0 rn a) rn a) 4) G. a) H H H fd H a) 4 Sa r-1 W O 0 C) 0 a) P4 a O - Q » ¥ n o .H 4-4 •\ 0 » / / / 4 / f 2 » U) / \ / t �/ / / § � ¥ e = § -H .\ k / 4-3 ( -I .a / 4 t ¥ @Q •\ / 4-4 .S4 ƒ t § / U) ® m » * 0 / a\ & •\ ai 4-3 / � >1.,..1 / c ® 0 � / / / � .a -1-3 M / 00 / \/ rli // m Qw E / .H C) R S 0-4 / § § 0 / § ] o ''-1 t < w t /- » / _ \ � /§ © 2 • m ) ® 0 4J ) f \ E / / / / Q.,-4-1 c Q Q = \ / E £ // § al / • » Q •/ •H -i-) 0 o Q •H n £ 0 H » £ g @ q 0 w » •H 13 C CONSENT 1992 is early in the year and there are no anticipated "budget versus actual expenditure" problems at this point. r r * -. * r * rrr * r * r r * r * -. * r * I--. r A A * A * A * AAA * A * A A * A * A * A * AA C) CO Co CO * CO * CO * CO 00 CO * CO * CO 00 * CO * Co * 00 * Co Co X CO r r * r * 0 * 000 * 0 * O 0 * O * 0 * 0 * 00 m N I-. r * O * co * 00 0000 * Co * UI UI * UI * CO * CO * N N C) CO * N * co * O)Co Of * CO * CO co * N * N * O * O O 7C C) M Z -I 0 -c 0 T . 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 D UI UI U1 UI U1 UI UI U1 UI 4.14 UI UI UI UI U1 --4 (n N N N N 1,31.%)N3 N N N N N N NN D V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V X \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ S. S. \ S. \\ 0 CO CO CO CO CO(0 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO N N N N NNN N N N N N N NN m m D 3 V V C - - z rh- a)Of r WW C.CO I-•I-. ' I-.I-. r -4 O) VV 0000 AA co CO UlA CO CO NUI CO c0 AA I-.i-• UI UI N CoA I-. (J G) CO CD 0)O) I-+NUTA 00 VV AA NN rr 00 - 0I tr V V NN 00 UIUIOO 00 a)a) 0000 to U1 0000 00 NON r co co AA 00 0000 00 t-•I-6 00 UI U1 (JW 00 N O UI * * * * * * * * * * * C) C) C) C) C)A C) co Co co co > > D D S 0 DDD C 0 > > CO CO D zzz A > C -I A CO z -4-1-1 m m -( O Z D D r m 0 73273 > 70 7 3 3 m > > O -41 WWIA Z CO -< w m Z c £ C ccc 0 C Z -I 0 0 Z h( -I a s.-O -Ti RI I-i £ C) 73 0 ri S. 'V =I «< r x 0 A -( CO > C) > -I CO C) O MI Z C)00 =3 N m 3 x Xi 0 I.4 CO DDD h-4 CO C m N Z Z xi xi z ; O 1.-4 Z C) CO £££ Z A Z DDD > 1.4 73 Cn CA CO M Sxx I- A G) { M Cl) m N3 RI m CO z mmm 73 -0 m rn as C) 0(n Ir .O 0 c m 000 rn = 0 0 m O Cc -( c C -u z ccc z 0 c c z z m•v rn M M "0 -1 MMM -I -n 1-4 M -1 -n NV I 1rI CO CO CO CO fro Q*tr-I 0 >• D CO D D A RI xo 1 D rn COCn N N CO M M N 1-I M < M M C) C C) z z z z z z z x co a -I -4 -I-1--4 -I -4 0 Cl) 1-4 0 A I- a -i CO I•I M 0 `-'1 Z 0 0 0 0 000 0 N 0 O O O 00 D r r r - rrr r r r r r r 1-1 I... C) 1 I 1 1 11 1 1 , I I 1 I 1 1 C) A A A A AAA A A A A A A AA 0 N N N CO 4...)n.)*..) CO CO N N CO CO CO IV C CO CO r 0o (.)CO O CO r CO CO CO CO CO r Z N N 0 0 N N N 0 0 N N 0 0 r0 -I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A Of A I- AWW (J N A A r r AA Z N N r CO r6r I- I- A A CO r I-.1%.1 0 CO UI r r rrr r N r r r r rr • I I I 1 I 11 I I 1 I I I I I A 0) A I- AwcJ CO N A A I-. r AA 1-I N N I-. co rOI r I- A A CO I- rIV Z UI r V V V r CO r Co A 0 NNN N 0 CO I-. CO A Of Of Of I- A r 0 1* 0 W CO w CO CO A V I- Of C.3 I- A CO V 1 V CO V O 0 r I (O 1S N 3 rn 33 CI) D * * * * IF * * * * N G) * * * * * * * * * > m * * * * * * X. * * G) I I I I I I I I 1 m C) A C) C) C) C) C) C) A CO CO N N U) N N N U) 1'- I•• * I•-r * I-. * H * /- * r * r * 1•- * r * M. * r * r Jr* * A A * A * A * A * A * A * A * A * A * A * C) CD 00 * 00 00 * CO * 00 * CO * 00 * 00 * 00 * CO NJ * NN * NJ * N * N * N * NJ * r * r * 00 * f.. * m NJ CO * CO CO * CO * V * C.) * W * I- * CO * CO * W * N * C) V * 00 * A * UI * CO * N * A * A * A * 0 * 0 7C C) M 2 -1 0 -f 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D Ut U1 V1 UI U1 N Ut U1 C11 V1 U1 V1 1 1n � �� m = NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ N N NJ NJ N NJ NJ > V V V V V V V V V V V V X \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Q CO CO CO CO CO 40 (0 CO CD CO CD CO NJ NJ NJ N NJ NJ N N NJ NJ N NJ 171 m > 3 I-. r r I-I-• C 2 0 N1- NN AA 1•-H AA NN I-I- --1 CO 0)CO 00 CD CD CO CO W C.] W W NJ N 0)CO V V V V I-H CO (D 000 V V 0000 0000 00 WCJ 0)0) AA V V CO OD I- 1-' 000 00 00 NN 00 (11 V1 00 I-.*. I-I- 00 UI I- 000 00 00 V V 00 NN 0000 00 NVI 00 o- * * * * * * * * * * * * r r r r -I I-1 M 0 Nz 0 0 > z ) ••1 w 0 rnCD m CO m m 1 m 3 7O 0 -Cv H In U) C C N 2 G) In rn 0 < in in z 7C = > m 1 0 m Z D z 00 m X 01 R• z 0 -*1-rt 1 3 3 -D1 I r C 73 0 r 0 o-I Z Too 70 Z Z I.1 Z 0 rn r 70 4 0 2 C7 A 0 DN> C 171 ) -•1 TI m -< 0 Z F-1 C) 4-I FA N -4 rn r X -1-I -< r N M M 73 rill m Z V I-i rn 1 N N C) N Z 0 0 C) FH V) —4 In 70 73 C)0 "0 la '0 0 -1 1 m 13 C I-I m 73 Z z Z 0 0 w C 3> A 71 D D C 0 IL-1 1I U) �t'Ti -11 T1 Z N rn rn -0 N 3 N R'Re N Cl) Re r r N -4 0 RI m Re I rn I-1 rn 1n to A3 acl C)0 < < 'n C I-I Cl)< C) S 2 xi O 00 U) C C 1 M 00 n co co I-I- z Cl) CA 1 CA N N N 1-4 b-I v N N 0 -4 -4 -4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 D I•- 1-.1.-• H r r r I. 1- r V1 I. C) I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 11 1 C) A A A A A A A A A A A A 0 W Co.)W W W W W C.) W N W W C CO CO CO r I- U1 0o co W CJ r V 2 0 00 0 0 0 r 0 0 N 0 0 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I - 1-•4-. F• (43 0) r r W A r A 2 U1 N I-• NJ W A N NJ C.) A CO NJ 0 N I•-I- r r F-. F- 0) I•- F- I. V 1 I I I I I I I I I I I r I-•I- r W 0) F. H W A I- A N VI NI- N W A N N CO A CO N Z 0 o-.I- N NJ N < A 00 CO 0 V CO A A N 00 00 N 0) 0 0) I-. OD CO V N A 00 •• 0 0 )- CO * NJ 3 rn v N D * * * * * * * * * * * V) G) * * * * * * * * * * * D rn * * * * * * * * * * * 0 I 1 I I 1 I I II I i m C) C) C) C) A C) C) C) C) C) C) U) V) N U) co Cl) N CO N Cl) Cl) N * r * r r * rrr * rrrr r * r * rrr * r * r rr r * A * A A * AAA * AAAA A * A * AAA * A * A AA C) (O * CO * CO CO A. Co CO CO * 00 00 00 00 00 * 00 * 00 00 CO * 00 * CO CO CO 2 CO * A * W W * W W W * W W W W W * W * W W W * W * N N N m N * N * (0 CO * (0(0(0 * CO CO CO CO CO * CO * 0)0)0) * W * (0 (0(O C) * Si) * 0) U1 * 000 * o000000o V * r * (0(40(0 * V * CO V V X 0 M 2 - O < 0 0 m 0 0 0 000 0000 0 0 000 0 0 00 > U1 U1 U1 U)U1 U) U1 V)in UI U) U1 N U)U) N UI UI U1 1 N \ \ \ \\\ \\\\ \ \ \\\ \ \ \\ m x N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN D V V V VVV '4-4-4-4 -J V .4-4-4 V V -4-4 7( \ \ \ \\\ \\\\ \ \ \\\ \ \ \\ 0 (0 (0 (O 000 0000 (O (O 000 (O (0 00 M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN m m D rr (,,)(„) NJ C z AA NN (0(JNN 0)rrrr rr AA AU1C M 0000 WW 0)0) ON(000 CVW0000 WW VV ArrN NN 00 AWO 0f0) NN (0(0 NAOOO 0)0)0000) WW OW (OWOW AA UlU1 NWA 00 0)0) rr V0V0 NVOUIO r)-- 00 0OIU1 00 00 (71Nr 00 AA rr 0000 UIU1000 (O(0 00 0000 (•)W 00 NAV * * * * * * * * * * * 0 2 Z zzz zzzz Z Z 333 X r I-I- 0 r(n (n 000 0000 D D zzz M 0 00 0 V v <<< (0ximA -I -4 Z 0 00 DDD ££ £ r 000 z m MM V X7CX mm mm 000 m D NN < rn III 0000 U) 71 G) M m -4 V V V -4-(M-( C) M Z D (/) 2 m rrr, x . DDD (n 0 mmm 00(0(0(0 m -«< C) 2 0 N 000 DDD› (0 0 0 o 7C 7�7� 2222 C m -T1-11,1 3 0 2 7C7CA7 (n 0 MMM m x mmm (n m 0 3333 (n —1 mmm C) 0 zzzz m m O . m . < -4A 1..1 m A 0 0 0 2 5-( N -I m (0 C C 0C)C) m-mm C 0 (0(0(0 C C) m(0 I-I I- -I -4 DDD› -1 C rrr -4 mm -4 O M M 000 «« M m 000 M 0 zz m 0 r r MMMM r (n 000 r -4-I 3 M M C)C)C) ZZZZ M M A OW 3 -1 -- SSS 0000 -4 !t* 333 -1 = 0 D M M 000 M D D D M 0 m M m RI >>>> m (n MMM m (n Z N 0 =za 0000 (n C ZZZ 0 XI C) -4 Vvv rnm mm (0 -4-)-( m = 000 zzZz (n 0 f+ -1-4-I-( C) •0 XI -I "1''171-n M 1"1 mmmrn -o 0 mmmm -4 2 0000 0 0 0 000000 0)A A(4 r 0 000 0 00 V O D ✓ r r A A A (41-0 V A r r r r r A W r C) I I 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 11 C) A A A N N N AAAA A A A A A A N AA 0 N W W WWW 0)0)0)0) W W NNN W W WW C w v v 000 rrrr v (0 WWW V 0 0000 Z 0 0 0 NNN NNNN 0 r 000 0 N 0 0 -I I 1 1 I I I Ili 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I A A A 000 0000 r W 0)rr 0) 0 Vr Z N N N 000 0000 A N A0000 N 0 WN 0 ✓ V v 000 0000 N r rWr 00 0 0-•43 • 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I I I A A A 000 0000 r W 0)rr 0) 0 yr M N N N 000 0000 A N A0303 N 0 W(1 < A (0(O(O r 0) (O 00 • ✓ WWW r 0 W AA A r p)r 0) N A WO # O V WAW 0 v r NN 0) N (O 1-1- o 1 U1 VV • 0 0 - 1 0 * N 3 m v N D * * * * * * * * N 0 * * * * * * * * D rn * * * * * * * * 0 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 m 0 C) C) C) A C) C) C) 0 Cl) 0 U) 0 0 0 0 W I-.I * r I•-r * I- X. r * r r * h r a ►- * F- * r r- * I-. I- AA * AAA * A * A * A A * AA * A * A * AA * A C) m CO 00 * CO 00 00 * co * 00 * 00 00 * Co Co * CO * CO * CO CO * 00 2 m U1 UI * VI U1 U7 * Ir * N * UI U1 * A A * A * A * A A * A T NJ w) * CJ(.)G7 * NJ * NJ * 0 O * V V * V * A * C...)C...) * CJ C) 00 * www * V * A * 00 V * 0000 * N * N * NN * O 7C C) M Z -I O -< 0 i 0 00 000 O O O O 00 O O 00 O > T VI UI U1 U1 V1 UI V1 N U1 N N (11 UI 0 N U1 -I (n �� ��s, - - .., - -� -S •� m x NN NJ NJ NJ N NJ N NJ NN NJ N NN N D VV VVV V V V V VV V s4 VV V X \� \\\ \ \ \ \ \\ - - \\ \ 0 co co (.0(D(O CO CO CO CO (D CO CO CO CO CO CO -0 NN NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ N NJ NN NJ NJ NN N m m D 3 1-- C 2 A A Co 0)N co V ,,,I h I-. NJ I-- r1- CO CD VV NN 4-00 U)U1 U1 U7 N.)CO C.) I-.f-. I-.43. W0)4-U1 NN AA NN VV 0(01- AA 00 000 00 (OV NJ COw0 0)0) UIU1 00 NN UI V10 AA VV 000 c..)c4 O)00 U10 U10 VI VI Vt U1 00 C.)GJ (00(O 0)0) 00 000 NN * * * * * * * * * * C)C) WWW V) VI N N AXI A r-I H DDD C -1 0 2 '- C m '0 1:: r -I-I 30 71 X1 -0C) M c > mm -1 0 0 D -< 73 73 T m -4 7r N 0 -Ti m xi '«-< 11 0 73 70 N DD N < 00 37 NNN 2 2 m m I-I- p 0 m --p4--4p4-p4 T m N T mm 0) Z rr = Co NN 000 z 22 -I C)C) m 0O rn 0 2 5 'i V-'I 0 A72 r A D D 7C 7C 7C 0 U) U) I-1 XI XS C. T N N 0 C) X 7K D C 73 1-o I-I 73 00 co m C)A 0 r H rn m m C Z Uf A R6 In m W 0 A N D 37 D ze Z C m 0 0 o N m xi C C ��� D - T m( n m T C)V) U) 1-4 Co 4C 0 0 DC C -4 -0v DDD -4 v 4-( C CD c C 0 u T -to-o <<< 0 -4 Z N M- M M M1:1 -0 5 I-I' mmT XI -4 -4 MI yr '0 -4 r- r 1-II I I-I- DN 0 N N !�ftp Qsfrl r11 C r- !26 3 3 m >I-I mm i:/ I-1-( 4-1 M HM N N N NNN r .0 C Z Z Z Z 0 70 CCC C W -I V -4 -4 C )-I WWW by 1-I NNN - -4 M 1-I N NU)U) N -I-i-I Z 00 r4-0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 > 1-4 1"' VI A r- H H 4- 1-- r I- r r ►-F- r C) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C) AA AAA A A .0. A AA A A AA A 0 NN www N VI G) NJ NN N N U1 N) NJ C I-I-• www NJ I- N CJ GI i-. CO w r I-. I- Z 00 000 N r 0 N N0 NJ NJ I-0 0 -I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1.4.1.-* I-rr (a w Nr CORN r I- A 1- NN NJ A A►- C..1 A 00 0)1- I-.NJ I- NJ NJ r I- N r 0) I- 4-f.. A I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I f-r r 1-1-- w C.) A C) 0)G) A A 0)CO A M NJ►- (DAN F- r A I- NN N A Ar N z C.) CO LJ I..r 0 CO CO O O V r V CoA X 0 0) (0 W 0)(D 0) 0) V A 0)1- y I 0)0. • 0 0 I- I co iv N 2 m -to * » * U) > * * * * * * N c) * * * * * * * * * 0 I I I I I m 0 C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) U) V) N V) N CO 7C T) CO N N N A r r r r I-. I It rr * I-. * * r * r * rrrr r A A A A A A * AA * A * AAAAA * A * A * AAAA C) W 00 00 00 00 00 00 * Wm * 00 * 0000000000 * 00 * 00 * 00000000 2 W 00 00 00 00 00 00 * MM * 0) * UI U1 U7 U1 N * U1 * (Ji * W1/100 m N O 0 0 0 0 0 * WW * 0 * 0000000000 * V * A * W W W W C') W A W N r 0 * 00 * 0 * 00000 * V * (11 * rnrnrnrn X C) I-I Z -i 0 < 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00000 0 0 0000 T D 4.11 U1 N U1 U1 0 NN N 00(.1100 UI U1 V1 U1(1U1 -1 U) \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\\\ \ \ \\\\ In 2 N N N N N N NN N N N N N N N N N N N N D V V V V V V VV V V V V V V V V V V V V X \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\\\ \ \ \\\\ O W W W W W CO COW W WWWWW W W CO CO COW M N N N N N N NN N N N N N N N N N N N N m RI D Nan.) U1 A C Z v1 U1 0)a) rr rr NN 000o a)00V A r 1- 0)0 V 00 rr (1U1 WW 0000 U1U V0000 OW NWAWAV WW AA A r 00 NN WW 0)0) WW 00 OA a) WW VO(OOVO 0000 WW 01-.0 r 00 (n(1 WW NN WW 00 UIIO VV (t1000NV 00 0000 1-.00NA 00 00 WO 0)0) 0000 00 000 010) 0)A000N 00 OW 00AWW * * * * * * * * * * * * 2 E A W W D EE G) CCCCC C N C)C)C)C) m 2 m 741 DD Xi Zz zZz z iMM ✓ M m XI D -I NUI m I^4MM4-44-4 N D -4-I-IV 0 70 G) 0 0 V-( G) -p-I--I- I M <<<-< M m mm 0 OC)) OO 0 v 0 0000 m -I1 C) 7C D D N rr m 0 0 72 UD 0 MaMAW 0 Z MT1m-f1 00 W r M D m ZZ X mmmmm -I -4 00000 M x m C) Z Z >> r Z Z Z Z Z 33 0 2 5 2 2 D m 0 -1 00 D -i-1-i-i- D O 3.>1.3. C) G) . ISI 2. mm z 3.3.3.3.3. 0 r XX77 2 r 0 C) Z r ii 0 -I N 0000 m > -I 0 0 mm m MTImM C) UI C) ZZ 00000 M C) mmmm 7C vI ►-I M 1 -I-4 mmmmm 0 mmmm C7 A A >D a mo z m m a a 0 ««< M m M CO V m XI M M m N m N CM -I WW000 M vI OVMO I-I C XI 0 C 0 C -I= = Ir-CCC 0 C COOC -I C 0 C o C 0 I10 > 00vv-p UI -o 'UU)U'p m I-I '11 1-I 0 H •p 1---,1 < 00•o M M -I 'D M-4-1M 3 -v M r v r ►•I m I-I-r- D r DDr V) M M -10 r 111-IMN C) I-I 1-40C)-4 0 3 m 3 m X m I-CM DDmmm m m mmmm m D M D 0 D N mX1 20 I-44-IN NV) N 0 N N H < H 4-4 N< Z2 C) Z Z Z Cl) -4-I M -I V -I C 1-4 W N -I 4-4 M N 0 -I Z 0 W 0 0 0 0 00 0 00000 0 0 1-000 D ✓ 0o r r r r rr r r r Utrrr C) I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1111 C) A A A A A A AA A A AAA A A A AAAA 0 N W N N N N WW W N N N N N W N N W W N C W I- W r W r VI- W W W r r r N r r N N r Z N 0 N 0 N 0 00 0 00000 0 0 0000 -I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I IIII 0) U1 0) A A O) VV r A W a)A A A A I-.0”-.A Z ✓ CO N N A A NN UI NI-.N.0.N N A WAWA 0 00 N 00 r r r rr r r r rrrr • I I I I 1 I I I I 11 I I I I 1 1111 0) A a) A A a) VV r A W 0)A A A A 10)1 r I-. r N N A A NN N N r N A N N A WAWA Z ✓ N N A i-.1.-.WWW 0 W N I- 00000 ✓ N 0) N AA000000 * 0 0) 0 O) 001-.1.-I-. a) 0) A -0 I • 0 0 ►- I co u N 3 m v 0 D * * * * * * N G) * * * * * * > (1, * * * * * * 0 I I I I I I m C) C) C) 0 C) C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 UI * r r r r r r r r r r r r r * A A A A A A A A A A A A C) Co * 0o 0o co Co co 00 Co CO CO CO CO Co 2 (D * 00 Co co co Co co co CO 00 00 co CO m N s r r r r r r r r 0 0 0 0 C) * V Q1 Ut A W N r 0 (O Co V O) 7C C) M 2 --I 0 -< 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 N 0 UI N UI 0 0 0 Ut UI 0 -1 N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ m 2 N N N N N N N N N N N N D V V V V V V V V V V V V X \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 CO CO (D (0 co CO co CO CO CO CO CD N N N N) N N N) NJ N N N N) m M > 3 0 1-.1,4 0 r N N V r W W rr C - - - - - . Z r AUirrr04-WNrr rr WW 00 WW NN rr VV AA -I Co UW VW oor 00 U1 oo O)N (OO UI UI 0)01 00 0000 rr NN AA VV 00 0000 Ul U1 V NWCCON0)VU1A0 NN 00 00 00 VV UI U1 00 0101 0000 Uf U1 WW 00 W VNV011100C000 00 00 00 00 0)0) 00 00 VV NN 00 00 00 W 0AU100001-0AA 00 00 00 00 0)0) 00 00 0000 AA 00 00 00 f 11 11 * * * * * * * * * -I D w to 'V Z Z C) 0 3 C 2 -i r --I 2 rn rn D > D Z D 0 mm-n-nmm'i-n'imm D D A Z -i A < A 0 -I CCCCCCCCCCC N -I z 7C > Z < 1-s C) rn D Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z A 0 C) \ 0 H D < r 00000000000 D m TI rn 3 Z -I V Q. m A z H W Z W 0 Z < 'D Z co-)0)AAWWNrr0 C) 0 Z 0 -4 A N m \ r C) 0 AWWr00o VrU Ar 1 m -I -< C V) W I- C) 0 0 R1 A 2 C N 0 0 A 1-1-C-I-I-I-I-I-4-I-i A N < 12 V) 0 r-1 A 00000000000 < C) C) Z 1 U) 2 -1-1-1-1-1-4-1-1-4-11 0 0 0 x G) v m DODDDDDDDDD C 0 ►-4 3 C) rrrrrrrrrrr -1 Z < -I 4-1 JC V) N Z -I D A A N m C) O 11 0 M A PV)rCorrr02-I0 N rn C) m m C) 0 -I -I 0 A A 1-1 0--I(0C(0(0(DDAAf C A A m C A A C A -I C)000WC(000u>DZ A C 0 0 A 0 m D D m 0 0 m AAV 0oNV1-I Zrn 'u N -n > N < < CO '1 3 QX 01* 2,.--I CO A r -0 0 C) m RI C) Z 1-10 I-1 > 4-4> 1-1 I u) 2 f2* r- r Q. N 2 0 OX -+i r <r m X G) m C) m C) m 70V-41•01-1 N D A V) R. Q. y A N D A w A A T1 1-1 '1 1-1 A < A C C < A 0 1••1 0'T1 A O 3 C Z M '1 W N N CO T A Z< 1 O<NV Z -I 0 0 N C C co 0 H DMO<m• A 0 C) W W 0 w mr3TIN3m�< M 1-4 N 1-4 14-4 Z MZ rn A 0 0 v 0 C-4 1-1 3 -4 -4 -I -1 Z -44 -4 m 1-+0 '1 Z 1-0 IC -4 1-4 Z -4 00 -n < 0 0 0 O 0 co 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 0 0o D r r A r r A r r r r r A C) I 4 11 I 11 I 1 1 I 1 n A A NJ A A N A A A A A N 0 N N W (J r W W W w W W W C r W 0 r A 0 Co W W CO r 0 Z 0 N N 0 0 N I- 0 0 r 0 N -I 1I I 1I I I 1 1 1 1 I 0) W 0 0) r 0 W W W r V 0 Z N r O N r 0 r r r N N 0 0 00 r 0 (D r 0 N W N r r 0 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 co W 0 01 r 0 W W w r V 0 M N r 0 N r 0 r r r N N) 0 Z W CO A CO r CO N N) A A N N O1 Co A 0 r 0) co it 0 Co V 0 r CO r Co 0) A 00 -0 1 LO • 0 0 ►- 1 WI * N 3 rn V) D a N C) s D m * 0 1 m C) 7C 0 rn O O O O O N (O O co co co I-4 CO CO CO OD CO OD CO CO OD C) a) H H I-' I-' H H H H H H H W H H H H H-' H H H H H H (1) • . . . w w \n w w \n N CO NO \O \D CT \O \D \D \O \O \D \O \O \O \O \O "' N N H W H H H NO N N N v1 N N N N N N N C..) N N N " H H 1-1 O 0 H v1 0 W N 1--' H 0\ VI \J1 W -4 -4 H H OD N 0 a Lo LA) -P- H H N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O n H N N vt -3 H N 0000000000000000 n H H H W ON N 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O '• w w -P- 1-1 H N 4-- O O O O O O O O O O O O. O O O O 3 H N N VI -4 H N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O cC CO-7 N 0 '11 O O 0 0 0 N 0 0 CO CO OD ] OD CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO n H W H H C HI-. H H H H I-' I-' H I-' H W H H I-' H H H H 1-' HHH ''1 I I I I 1Z7 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O n ' C/) CI Cl '-3 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H cG c+,P (D '03 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OC) c+ O 3 cr+ '11 C a H P P CI) C) H C7 H H [rj I H P) H '11 G Z '• tJ• Z Hf N ch� O Cb 0 VI 0 H H c,., H -4 CO CD co - H \O N \ I N W NO 7 w \D N N O\ O W ' w 0 C 3 W W H N ON CO N vl N w H H N H 0 VI -1 \!1 O\ -4 CO-4 5 r CD -P- - W W V H CoCb \O 1 H Co ' W . COW 1 O\ -1 \O ' O\ \O 0 0 0 cP+ H c+ w -3 0 C3\ vt O O\ 0 0 H -1 -I w w -3 0 \O N 0 4 3 \n H Cp \n 0 0 \O O\ 0 0 0 0 • co O\ 0 N -P. ON 0 N NJ, 0 CO ON N c+ 'r1 a c+ C) n _ O fH = '3 C) '-3 'b C] (I) 3 w z w C!) �7 �3 z xJ = xl w xi m = xi C ].... CD P1 'i 'i P1 0 r• CD CD CD CD CD CD CD lD CD (D (D CD CD (D cD r3 \ I H \O H D P O 'LS 'i 01 3 3 3 £ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ca yH O O\ (D r• < '4 r• H) C) r• r• r• (D r• r. r. r• r. r• r• r• r. r•d W (DH C!) dP n c+ cf• c+ 'i c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ 'wi "[1 H H Cb N O H CD H CD 'd '=J CA C!) C) x C" b C I CA 'T1 3 '-.1 'rJ N aH W W O\ 0 Ro 'i tri h-1 Hi CD P (D r• trJ (D s-I P (D H F-1 '<(D M < t'i 3 Z C) '3 'i 3 P 'fi Di H) '3 << a n H CI rn� o o .a CD .n P > > < C) H cD a m '1 r• a 00 N O\O O r 0 0 Cl-+ CD c+ 'i 0 n P '3 co 't3 's 3 C) HH-' '1 rr r 3D tv 0) • 3 3 Cl)C!) C7 c+ CA Cl) 'O P C) < Cii DC H W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WWW n C° CO C° CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO OD CO CO CD CO CO CO CO CO CO x v1 v1 \n \!1 Nil vl vl \n \n NA v1 \n \n vi \xi vl vl vl vl VI \n VI VI • N 0\ C\ v1 VI \n \ti v1 VI \n \n \n \n 4- - -4- - •4- 4' -P" - - -4- 0 O \D CO 0\ \n -P- co N H 0 NO CO -3 O\ VI - L.) N H H H Oz = n U) 3 CD 3 C) c.-. 'C1 3 CD 3 > cc! '0 b = b C) = _ = 3 < CD c+ P O P O P Cri P O O '=1 H 'i tri tri O Pl CD H • 'I 3 'i 3 3 xl 'i 3 'i C H w Mi 3 '•i Z H H < .0 3 CD > .0 3 > 0 3 > C!) 3 .a• C. H CD CA r• CD '1 C) C] O H O << Ro 'I Cly 0 3 0 r• O O CO "•i P () 3 P C) '3 P '4 pta Cl) ^3 '-h P 'i CD C 3 r• :3' 3 a) p 3 .3 Di r• x P CD x DJ C!) \ H = x 0 3' CD C) H r• CD 0 p (D 3 3 r• C!) cn Co < 3 H 3 < Cr) CD CJ CD c+ 3 > 3 CD 0 CD 3' .0 '1 O go CA P 3 1-1 CJ) c+ 3 iv 0 'i x '3 O x 0 3 3' 0 3 x 'Ci Cn '0 P N• 'b CD (D D H (D '3 til CD H O) CD (!) H (D 0 CD c+ < CD c+ a (D '•i H H Cl H (D x • \Hl1 NO H H H 3 CO 0 \n O N H \D w 1-' C3\ a CO r H NO N ‘...l N co NO -4 w \D N N ON 0 -1 w - N Cr CO N vt N t...W H H N H O \rl -3 \n ON N -1 CT CO NO c,., L., w Vl H Co \n w Cr -3 \D • 0\ \O co 0 •P-. w H 0 ON \n 0 ON 0 0 H -4 -I w W -3 4 0 NO N 0 -I OD \n 0 \O 0\ 0 0 0 0 - w ON 0 N = CT O N \n O O\ 4- (3 a COSEIT ' MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, City Planner RE: Minnesota Valley 7th Addition Request for Deferral of Park Dedication Fee DATE: May 27, 1992 INTRODUCTION: The City has received a request from Laurent Builders to defer park dedication fees for Minnesota Valley 7th Addition until building permits are issued for each lot. BACKGROUND: On April 21, 1992, the City Council approved the final plat of Minnesota Valley 7th Addition. A park dedication fee for the subdivision was required as a condition in the resolution. Attached is a letter from the developer requesting the deferral. Section 12 . 07 , Subd. 5E, states that park dedication fees may be deferred until building permits are issued for lots in a plat as approved by the City Council. The deferral of park dedication fees must be made in accordance with provisions established in developers agreement. The decision to defer park dedication fees is at the City Council 's exclusive discretion. DISCUSSION: It has not been the practice of staff in the past to actively request developers to submit a specific request for deferral to the City Council. It should be noted that the deferral of park dedication fees has been common practice in the City of Shakopee. Of the 160 plats recorded in the City, 35 plats have had park dedication fees deferred to the issuance of building permits. Staff has taken steps to request that, in the future, developers identify with the plat submittal their intentions of fulfilling the park dedication requirements. Staff anticipates that the decision on deferral of park dedication fees will be included with the subdivision plat review process. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the deferral of park dedication fees for Minnesota Valley 7th Addition until the issuance of building permits for each lot within the plat. ACTION REOUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 3601, a resolution approving the deferral of park dedication fees for Minnesota Valley 7th Addition until the issuance of building permits for each lot. RESOLUTION NO. 3601 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, APPROVING THE DEFERRAL OF PARK DEDICATION FEES FOR MINNESOTA VALLEY 7TH ADDITION UNTIL THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee did approve the Final Plat of Minnesota Valley 7th Addition on April 9, 1992 and has recommended its adoption; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee did approve the Final Plat of Minnesota Valley 7th Addition on April 21, 1992; and WHEREAS, the developer, Laurent Builders, has requested a deferral of the park dedication fees until building permits are issued for each lot; and WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Code, Section 12 . 07, Subd. 5E, allows for the deferral of such fees as approved by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, as follows: That the park dedication fees for Minnesota Valley 7th Addition are deferred for each lot until the building permits for the principal structures are issued. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Plat and Developer' s Agreement. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1992 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney The Laurent Building LAURENT Corporate Office 128 South Fuller Street, Shakopee, MN 55379 g U I L D E R S,�I N c. (612) 445-6745 May 26, 1992 Mr. Lindberg Ekola City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Lindberg, Pursuant to Park Dedication Requirements of the City of Shakopee of September 1991, we hereby request that part dedication payments be deferred until a building permit is issued for each of the lots within the proposed Minnesota Valley 7th Addition plat. We understand the we will be entering a contractual agreement which will designate the amount to be paid in lien of park dedication for each specific lot in the plat and that said agreement will be filed with the Scott County Recorder as a lien against the property. Sincerely, LAURENT BUILDERS, INC. ct,'"•17' g,_40,t_aA Randy R. Laurent Vice President RRL;kp BUILDERS • DEVELOPERS MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Swimming Pool Pump DATE: May 27, 1992 INTRODUCTION: One of the pumps at the Shakopee pool was recently discovered to be inoperable. It would be appropriate at this time to discuss options for replacing the pump. BACKGROUND: The Shakopee Municipal Pool has two pumps that circulate water through the filter system. During our annual Spring maintenance check, it was discovered that both pumps were inoperable. Public Work' s Department staff were able to repair one of the pumps. The second pump was determined to be completely shot. The scheduled opening date for the pool is Saturday, June 6, 1992 . The pool can operate on one pump. However, should that pump become inoperable, the pool would be forced to close. It should be noted that both of the pumps that we are talking about are original equipment (24 years old) . Staff utilized the services of Virg Lukin and Associates to determine what type of pump was necessary to get the pool operational. Mr. Lukin is a professional pool consultant who has extensive experience in designing and constructing outdoor and indoor municipal pools. Mr. Lukin feels that the entire pumping system needs to be replaced and repiped within the next five years. Recognizing that the existing equipment has probably exceeded it' s normal life and given the City' s budget situation, Mr. Lukin is proposing that we replace one of the pumps at this time and that we budget accordingly for an overhaul of the pumping system within the next five years. Mr. Lukin suggested that staff obtain price quotations for a new 15 H.P. pump. Mr. Lukin feels that this pump would provide us with a 5-10 year life. Staff has received quotations from several vendors for the pump as suggested by Mr. Lukin. Prices range between $4 , 500 and $5, 000. The prices quoted do not include installation. We hope to utilize Public Works staff or our mechanical contractor to install the pump. Delivery time on the pump is 7-10 days. The options available at this time are as follows: 1. Direct the appropriate City officials to purchase a 15 H.P. pump at a cost not to exceed $4 , 500. 2 . Direct staff to pursue a complete retrofit of the pumping system replacing both pumps and reworking the piping system at a cost not to exceed $20, 000. 3 . Direct staff to purchase a smaller sized pump (10 H.P. - $4 , 100) . 4 . Direct staff to purchase a larger size pump (20 H.P. - $5, 500) . In terms of funding the various options, the 1992 budget for the pool does not include adequate funds to replace the pool pumps. There is approximately $1, 500 remaining within the swimming pool budget for equipment maintenance that could be allocated to off-set a portion of the cost of a new pump. This was an unforseen expenditure at the time of budget preparation. Therefore staff is recommending that the remainder of the pump acquisition cost be allocated from the contingency appropriation account. A second option would be to utilize the Park Reserve Fund. Staff does not favor utilizing the Park Reserve Fund since over $120, 000 was recently allocated from that fund to cover the cost of the pool liner and filter system. We project that the 1992 Park Reserve Fund balance at the end of 1992 will be remaining of approximately $76, 000. Staff feels that the Park Reserve Fund was not intended for normal customary and maintenance items. The Contingency Fund had an initial allocation of $50, 000. Approximately two weeks ago the City Council approved allocating $6, 000 (Actual allocation needed after receiving quotations was $5, 500. ) from the fund for a new heating/cooling system at the Public Works Building. This leaves a current balance of $44 ,500. Staff is recommending that the pool pump be replaced with a 20 H.P. pump at a cost not to exceed $4 , 500 with $1, 500 to be allocated from the swimming pool equipment maintenance account and the balance ($3 , 000) funded from the contingency appropriation account. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Direct the appropriate City officials to purchase a replacement pump for the Shakopee pool at a cost not to exceed $4, 500 with $1, 500 to be allocated from the swimming pool equipment maintenance budget and $3 , 000 to be allocated from the contingency appropriation account. 2 . Authorize the appropriate City officials to purchase a replacement pump for the Shakopee pool with $1, 500 to be allocated from the swimming pool equipment maintenance account and $3 , 000 to be allocated from the Park Reserve Fund balance. 3 . Direct staff to proceed in obtaining cost quotations for complete over-all of the pumping system with funding to be allocated from the Park Reserve fund or contingency appropriation fund. 4 . Do nothing in terms of replacing the second pump. 5. Direct staff to purchase a smaller or larger size pump. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1. ACTION REQUESTED: Direct the appropriate City officials to purchase a replacement pump for the Shakopee pool at a cost not to exceed $ , 500 with $1, 500 to be allocated from the swimming pool equipment maintenance budget and $3 , 000 to be allocated from the contingency appropriation account. BAS/tiv ‘z CONSENT MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Recommendation to City Council from Committee of the Whole on New City Hall Construction DATE: May 29, 1992 At the Committee of the Whole meeting on May 26th, a recommendation was made to the City Council to authorize the project architect and construction manager to prepare plans and bid specifications for an elevator in the new City Hall facility. RECOMMENDED ACTION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the project architect and the construction manager for the new City Hall project to prepare the necessary plans and bid specifications for the construction of an elevator to meet all applicable code requirements in the new City Hall building located at 129 South Holmes Street. / 1Lk c r\ `-" MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: 12th Avenue Sewer and Water Project No. 1992-4 DATE: May 28, 1992 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 3600 which authorizes staff to advertise for bids for the 12th Avenue Sewer and Water Project. BACKGROUND: On March 10, 1992 the City Council of Shakopee ordered the preparation of plans and specifications for the 12th Avenue Sewer and Water Project by Resolution No. 3600. This project consists of installing sanitary sewer and watermain on 12th Avenue between County Road 83 and Valley Park Drive to serve the Industrial Park. Plans and specifications are now completed and the project is ready for bids. Attached is Resolution No. 3600, which authorizes the advertisement for this project for Council consideration. A copy of the plans and specifications will be available at the Council meeting for review and comment or they can be inspected ahead of time in the Engineering Department. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 3600. 2 . Deny Resolution No. 3600. 3 . Table Resolution No. 3600. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 3600, A Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids for 12th Avenue Sewer and Watermain Improvements, Between County Road 83 and Valley Park Drive, Project No. 1992-4 and move its adoption. DH/pmp MEM36001 RESOLUTION NO. 3600 A Resolution Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Advertisement For Bids For 12th Avenue Sewer And Watermain Improvements, Between County Road 83 And Valley Park Drive Project No. 1992-4 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 3558 adopted by City Council on March 10, 1992 , David E. Hutton, Public Works Director, has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of 12th Avenue, between County Road 83 and Valley Park Drive by sewer and watermain and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file and of record in the Office of the City Engineer, are hereby approved. 2 . The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertise- ment for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The Advertisement for Bids shall be published as required by law. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 19 Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney /Ca— May 28, 1992 Bob Sweeney Shakopee City Council 506 S. Holmes St. Shakopee, MN 55379 I am writing this letter on behalf of my father, Urban Klein. Earlier this year, my mother and father's sewer began to act up. Numerous attempts were made to correct the problem, but none seemed to work. Five different service people stated that their sewer line was clear all the way to the city's main. After this diagnosis, water still began to back up into the basement. My father then contacted the city of Shakopee requesting that they investigate further. The city found no problem with the main and therefore the only resolution was to dig up the entire sewer line from my father's house to the road. After doing this, it was found that my father's sewer was hooked up to a forty year old line and not to the new main. This line worked perfectly for all of those years, but with all the recent street construction in the area, the line may have been broken or crushed by Barbarosa, the contractor. This cannot be detected since this is one of the few streets in Shakopee that had no x-rays of the underground utilities. Over $3,500 later, the problem is solved but the liability for repair is still unresolved. My father has paid all of the bills and has received no satisfaction from Mr. Hutton and the City of\ Shakopee, Barbarosa Construction, or Barbarosa Construction's insurance company. Each party has a tendency to blame the other. When it comes right down to it, my father's sewer was working just fine from his house to the main; the problem was with the city's portion of the sewer line. This seems rather simple to me that he should not be liable for something that is the city's responsibility and is totally out of his control. These lines were installed over j forty years ago prior to his residency there. My mother and father are on a fixed income and therefore they can ill afford a $3,500 repair bill. Even more important is that my father's health is not the greatest to begin with. All the arguing and frustration continues to cause additional problems to his well being. As a constituent of yours, I am requesting that you contact Mr. Hutton and ask him for all of the details to this long, drawn-out affair. Undoubtedly, my father is not liable for a problem with the city main, but no one seems to care. He has paid taxes on his home for forty years which allows him access to city sewer and water. If this service is not available to him, it is the city's responsibility to correct it. I have scheduled a meeting with Mr. Hutton at the city office on Wednesday, June 3 at 3:30. I will be in attendance, along with my brother, Dave. I am requesting your support for an expeditious and satisfactory resolution to this problem. My father will not attend as I do not wish to cause him any more frustration. As my representative in city government, I would appreciate your assistance. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at home at 445-9249 or work at 340-3205. rely, i iam Klein. RECEIVED 8051 Horizon Drive Shakopee, MN 55379 MAY 2 91992 CITY OF SHAKOPEE ,, K • �L•d :i; • • f`•v • ,.r . • f; :'1 •