Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/06/1991 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items DATE: November 1, 1991 1. Attached are the unapproved minutes of the October 16, 1991 Community Development Commission meeting. 2 . Attached are the unapproved minutes of the October 16, 1991 Energy and Transportation Committee meeting. 3 . Attached is correspondence to Mr. Flykt, Barbarossa & Sons from Dave Hutton regarding the 2nd Avenue Project. 4 . Attached is correspondence from Mayor Laurent to Mr. Darrel Peterson, MN Public Utilities Commission regarding U.S. West telephone rates. 5. Attached is the Police Newsletter for Council review. 6. Attached is a notice of a Metropolitan Council Public Meeting to receive comments on an EAW for the proposed Scott County Municipal Solid Waste Compost Project. The meeting is scheduled for Monday, November 18th at 7: 00 PM at the Scott County Courthouse. . 7. A representative from the M.S. Society has inquired as to whether or not Shakopee limits the sale of pulltabs to liquor establishments. He was advised that it does not. They are looking into the possibility of putting pulltabs into convenience stores. He was advised that the proceeds must be spent within the city's trade area. 8. Attached are the October 3 , 1991 minutes of the Planning Commission and Board of Adjustments & Appeals meetings. 9. Attached are the November 7, 1991 agendas for the Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment & Appeals meetings. - 10. On October 29, 1991 the Committee of the Whole recommended to City Council that the property South of the intersection of Vierling Dr. and the Upper Valley Drainageway be released from moratoria and the property to the North of said point be continued in moratoria for an additional 18 months. This item will appear on the November 19, 1991 City Council agenda. The appropriate resolutions can not be prepared until the legal descriptions of the Upper Valley Drainageway and Vierling Dr. are completed. 10. A preliminary time schedule for the municipal facility needs assessment task force will be included with the November 19, 1991 Council packet as a non-agenda informational item. 11. Attached is a memorandum from the Public Works Director regarding the Comprehensive Sewer Plan. -* I SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION City Council Chambers October 16, 1991 Chairperson Albinson called the meeting to order at 5:45 p.m. with the following members present: Charles Brandmire, Mike Beard, Jon Albinson and Bill Mars. Commissioners Pennington, DuBois and Miller were absent. Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator, was also present. Mr. Albinson stated that he would like to resign as chairperson for personal reasons. Discussion ensued on the process to appoint a new chairperson. Mr. Stock stated that he thought it would appropriate for the first Vice-Chairperson to serve as the chairperson until elections are held next February. The Committee members in attendance concurred. Mr. Bill Mars was the first Vice- Chairperson and will now serve Chairperson for the remainder of Mr. Albinson's term as chair. Mr. Albinson stated that he is not resigning from the Community Development Commission, just the responsibilities associated with the chairperson position. Albinson/Brandmire moved to approve the minutes of the September 18, 1991 meeting as kept. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion ensued on economic development activity currently under way in Shakopee. Discussion then ensued on the possibility of an Industrial Park in Prior Lake, located at the northwest corner of County Rd. 42 and County Rd. 18. Mr. Beard stated that he was not aware of any firm decision on the siting of the aforementioned industrial park. He stated that he thought Prior Lake was considering the siting of an industrial park at the southeast corner of County Rd. 21 and County Rd. 42. He felt that the County Rd. 18/42 intersection did not provide a good site for an industrial park, due to its proximity to residential housing. Discussion ensued on the One and Five Year Community Development Work Plans. Commissioner Albinson stated that many of the items on the Work Plan deal with the Downtown Committee. He questioned the status of several of the objectives. Mr. Stock stated that the Downtown Committee has been considering recommending to the Community Development Commission that an architect or design company be hired to complete a conceptual drawing of the downtown area that would illustrate the impact of a completed mini bypass on the existing buildings within the downtown area. Mr. Stock noted that many residents in the community and downtown business owners have a difficult time conceptualizing what visual and aesthetic impact the mini bypass will have on the downtown area. This fact has made it difficult for many people to determine what, if anything, should be done with the downtown area, especially the property located north of 1st Ave. Chairman Mars suggested that perhaps a model could be done. Mr. Albinson stated that the cost for a model might be prohibitive. Mr. Stock stated that it was the Minutes of the Page - 2 Community Development Commission October 16, 1991 desire of the Downtown Committee to have some of the funds that are generated from the sale of the parking lot utilized for downtown design and planning. Mr. Stock stated that several other items that the Downtown Committee are working on relate to code amendments to the zoning ordinance as they relate to the B-3 district. Mr. Stock stated that the majority of these changes will be presented by the City Planner when a comprehensive update of the zoning ordinance is undertaken. Commissioner Brandmire questioned the status of the Fire Station site. Mr. Stock stated that the City Council recently directed the City Planner to begin a siting analysis for a new Fire Station. Mr. Brandmire stated that he thought the Fire Dept. had completed an analysis. Mr. Stock stated that Mr. Brandmire was correct but that Council wanted additional review of the matter. Commissioner Brandmire questioned what factors and criteria the Planning Dept. would utilize in siting a Fire Station. Mr. Stock stated that the City Administrator has obtained a criteria and analysis framework for siting Fire Stations that will be utilized by the Planning Dept. staff. Mr. Stock also noted that several Council members have suggested further evaluation of the property owned by the City on the Gorman St. site. Mr. Stock also noted that perhaps the property located south of the Sr. High School, if it is acquired, may also be appropriate to at least consider for a Fire Station site. Chairperson Mars questioned the status of the Star City elements. Mr. Stock noted that many of the annual Star City requirements are currently being completed in conjunction with the other communities who serve on the Scott County Economic Development Coalition. Mr. Stock stated that the labor survey listed in the One Year Work Plan is being proposed for 1992. The Scott County Economic Development Coalition is looking at the possibility of hiring a consultant to analyze the 1990 census data. Mr. Stock noted that the 1990 census data is the most complete and statistically accurate available and that it will be more useful data than any direct mail survey that can be developed by the Coalition. Mr. Stock also noted that Scott County Economic Development Coalition is proposing a visitation program. As part of the program, each community will select six businesses in their community to visit. Mr. Stock stated that ideally he would like to have the program expanded in Shakopee to contact at least one business per month. Mr. Mars stated that he would like to have that particular item included in next years Work Plan and make an attempt to reach at least 12 businesses per year. It was the consensus of the Committee that this item should be placed on the 1992 Work Plan and have the members of the CDC involved in serving on the contact teams. Mr. Albinson stated that the Transportation Coalition held the ground breaking for the County Rd. 18 project on October 15, 1991. He stated that the attendance was excellent. Minutes of the Page - 3 Community Development Commission October 16, 1991 Mr. Stock stated that the City Council will be meeting on October 29, 1991 to discuss the proposed Work Plan of the Municipal Facility Task Force. Mr. Stock stated that the meeting should be lively and that it is open to the public. Commissioner Albinson stated that Shakopee Public Utility Commission is working on a plan to underground the overhead lines in the downtown area. It is being proposed that the underground lines be completed in conjunction with the alley improvements in the downtown area. Mr. Albinson stated that the downtown property owners will have to pay the cost of upgrading their individual services to connect into any new underground line. He stated that this could be somewhat controversial in light of the expense involved. Mr. Stock stated that the Scott County Economic Development Coalition has created two subcommittees. One committee has been created to work on business retention and expansion. The other committee focus is on marketing. To date the committee has been very effective in the short time that it has been established. Mr. Stock stated that the opportunity to get together on a monthly basis and share information on potential prospects has been very worthwhile and informative. He expected that the Coalition will produce its first mailing piece to be distributed in early January. Commissioner Beard questioned the status of the City brochure. Mr. Stock stated that earlier today he reviewed the final proof of the residents' guide. He stated that he was confident that it would be completed by the November meeting. Mr. Stock stated that the process has taken longer than normal due to the change in staff at River Valley Printing. The meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Barry A. Stock, Recording Secretary 4,3 SHAKOPEE ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Regular Session October 16, 1991 Chairperson Drees called the meeting to order at 7 : 00 p.m. with Commissioners Otto, Stolarcek, Case, Drees, Ward and Reinke present. Commissioners Roman, Mars and Kelly were absent. Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator, was also present. Reinke/Ward moved to approve the minutes of the September 18, 1991 meeting as kept. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock stated that on October 10, 1991, he meet with Mr. Joe Morley, National School Bus General Manager, to discuss the proposed extension of the Dial-A-Ride contract and the accompanying rate per hour for service. Mr. Stock stated that the current Dial- A-Ride hourly rate is $19 . 15 per hour. National School Bus initially proposed a new rate for the continued contract at $22 .71 per hour. Mr. Stock stated that National has agreed to lower their rate to $22 . 12 per hour. Mr. Stock stated that he has surveyed other Dial-A-Ride systems in the metropolitan area to determine if the proposed $22 . 12 rate is reasonable. Mr. Stock noted the following Dial-A-Ride transit systems and accompanying rates for service: Southwest Metro $25. 00 Plymouth $24 .96 Anoka $25. 62 White Bear Lake $28 . 00 N.E.S.T. $23 . 62 Mr. Stock stated that based on the survey of other Dial-A-Ride systems that the proposed $22 . 12 rate per hour of service would seem to be reasonable. Mr. Stock noted that Southwest Metro and Plymouth are very comparable services to what is provided in Shakopee. Each of the two systems have vehicles that are the exact age and make as the Shakopee vehicles. Based on the survey, Mr. Stock stated that he felt the proposed rate for service was reasonable and that we would probably not attain a lower rate by going out for bides. Mr. Stock stated that he has also been working with the Regional Transit Board to determine if Opt-out communities can utilize transit dollars to purchase vehicles. Mr. Stock stated that he has been working with the Southwest Metro Transit administrator to evaluate the potential for working together on a proposal to acquire vehicles. Mr. Stock stated that if we could acquire our own vehicles the cost per hour of service would likely be reduced. Rather than recommending acceptance of National School Bus' s proposed rate at this time, Mr. Stock suggested that Mr. Morley attend our next meeting to discuss the rationale for the proposed new rate. It was the consensus of the Committee to request Mr. Morley' s attendance at our next meeting, prior to making a recommendation to City Council on whether or not Minutes of the Page - 2 Energy and Transportation Committee October 16, 1991 the current Dial-A-Ride contract should be extended or if bids should be secured at this time. Mr. Stock stated that each year the Vanpool and Dial-A-Ride programs are audited by the Regional Transit Board. The 1990 audit was recently completed and the auditor has cited several findings and recommendations in regard to our transit program. Mr. Stock then went through each of the items cited by the auditor. Mr. Stock stated that the auditor made it clear that these are only recommendations based upon what he has discovered in the audit process. Mr. Stock noted that many of the items addressed by the auditor do not have any merit in regard to our system. For example, the auditor has suggested that the number of backup drivers be limited to one person per vehicle. Mr. Stock stated that the cost difference between one and two backup drivers is insignificant and that many of the Vanpools would be adversely affected by changing our current policy. Mr. Stock stated that one of the major items addressed by the auditor related to the backup vehicle. The auditor is suggesting that the backup vehicle be eliminated and that car pooling be utilized in the event of a breakdown. Mr. Stock stated that the cost of the backup vehicle is significant but that eliminating it would not sit well with our current Vanpool drivers and riders. Mr. Stock stated that he is currently investigating the possibility of acquiring a used van to serve as the backup vehicle. This would certainly reduce costs and still provide a high level of comfort to our Vanpool riders and drivers. Commissioner Ward stated that she did not feel that any of the items expressed by the auditor were of any great nature. Mr. Stock concurred and stated that the majority of the items can be easily resolved through communications with our Vanpool drivers. Mr. Stock noted that he intends to have a Vanpool driver meeting in November to address several of the concerns raised by the auditor, including the mileage reimbursement rate paid by Vanpool drivers who utilize the vehicles for personal use. Presently Vanpool drivers are paying 210 per mile for extra vehicle miles. Mr. Stock stated that he did concur with the auditor' s suggestion that the rate be increased to correspond with the IRS standard rate of 260. Discussion then ensued on the eligibility for Vanpool services. The auditor noted that several of our Vanpools carry riders from outside of our community. Mr. Stock noted that traditionally it has been the policy of the City to allow out of town residents, who previously had access to the Shakopee transit program, to ride at a fare level comparable to that of Shakopee residents. At the present time, we have a Vanpool that originates in Shakopee and goes to St. Paul. A number of the riders reside in Savage and Burnsville. Mr. Stock stated that these riders did not originally have access to the former MTC bus service in Shakopee. The 17 Minutes of the Page - 3 Energy and Transportation Committee October 16, 1991 question has arisen whether or not these riders should be eligible to ride our vehicles at Shakopee resident Vanpool rates. Commissioner Stolarcek suggested that Minnesota Valley Transit be contacted to determine if they would like to subsidize their residents who are utilizing our Vanpool program. Mr. Stock stated that he did meet with the Minnesota Valley Transit administrator on Tuesday, October 15, 1991 to discuss the concept raised by Ms. Stolarcek. Mr. Stock stated that the Minnesota Valley Transit administrator did respond favorably to the concept of jointly sharing in the cost of our St. Paul van. Mr. Stock stated that another meeting has been set up with the Minnesota Valley Transit administrator for October 17 to discuss the concept in greater detail and come up with a plan. Mr. Stock stated that following the meeting with the Vanpool drivers, he would bring back any proposed policy changes for the Energy and Transportation Committee ' s review and consideration. Mr. Stock then reviewed the recycling and transit reports. Mr. Stock noted that the Fall Yard Waste Collection day has been scheduled for November 9 , 1991. The utility bill stuffer will go out with the utility bills on November 1st. Ads will also be appearing in the Shakopee Valley News and Shakopee Mint beginning next week. The meeting adjourned at 8 : 00 p.m. Barry Stock, Recording Secretary *3 CITY OF SHAKOPEE INCORPORATED 1870 t 129 EAST FIRST AVENUE, SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379-1376 (612)445-3650 October 28, 1991 , Mr. Paul Flykt Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. P.O. Box 367 Osseo, MN 55369 RE: 2nd Avenue Project Dear Mr. Flykt: I am in receipt of your October 24, 1991 letter requesting that your interim Time of Completion for the above referenced project be extended from November 1, 1991 to November 15, 1991. The interim Time of Completion covers all work except the sodding and final wear course. I concur with the 3 reasons listed in your letter for making this request and feel that this is a legitimate request. I would like to remind you though that this project was awarded to your firm on June 16th, the preconstruction meeting was June 28th and a preliminary start-up date of July 8th was provided to City staff, yet you did not actually start construction until July 29, 1991. If these delays had not occurred at the front end of the project, you would probably not be requesting a time extension at this time. Even with the late start date, though, I believe you would have met your November 1, 1991 deadline had it not been for the 3 reasons listed. I also believe you have made a very conscientious effort to meet your deadlines. Because of these reasons and the fact that Barbarossa & Sons has done outstanding work in Shakopee, I will approve of your request. In addition, there is ample time left in the construction season to grant this extension without adversely affecting the residents impacted by this project. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, David E. Hutton, P.E. Public Works Director DH/pmp The Heart Of Progress Valley AN EQUAL OPPORTUN,TY EMPLOYER BARBAROSSA AND SONS, INC■ OSSEOPMMINNESOTA 55369 612-425-4146 BARBAROSSA BLASTING FAX 612-425-0797 GENERAL CONTRACTORS October 24, 1991 City of Shakopee 129 1st Avenue East Shakopee MN 55379-1376 Attn: David id Uutton Public Works Director RE: 2nd Avenue Reconstruction Project Project No. 1991-03 Dear Mr. Hutton, I am writing regarding the specified "Time of Completion" on our 2nd Avenue project . I am requesting a time extension to November 15 , 1991 for completion of all work except the sod and wear course. We will make every effort to have the sodding done by this date also but it is very possible this won' t be done. I am making this request as a result of: 1 . The abnormal number of rain days for this time of year. 2. Design change adding the Spencer Avenue Crossing . 3 . More pipe work than the original plans called for. Barbarossa and Sons, Inc. has worked overtime and Saturdays in an attempt to meet the specified completion date as a result of these three items. We are not going to make it and therefore I am requesting the extension. If you have any questions or comments please call me at 425-4146. Your cooperation is appreciated as always. Si , erely, le. _rb=rossa a,fid S. , Inc . 'au 1 k ir ice Pre-. i ,- t 01-1 4.00.,- -7 ci,it s '=; , SHAKOPEE clo`- CITY OF -:7, 1 INCORPORATED 1870 0lk \ 129 EAST FIRST AVENUE, SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379-1376 (612)445-3650 { ;.::.; 1 October 28, 1991 Mr. Darrel Peterson, Chair Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 780 American Center Building 160 East Kellogg Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55101 Dear Mr. Peterson: It is my understanding that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission will be considering an issue relating to the tier rate structure for determining local service telephone rates for U.S. West Communications customers (Docket No. P-421, et. al./CI-87-76) . We understand that under the current tier rate structure there are no proven cost of service correlations to justify the higher rates paid by Shakopee residents and businesses. (Tier III) This being the case, the current structure is obviously unfair and discriminates against those persons who have chosen to live outside of the central Minneapolis/St. Paul area. Additionally, I want to make it clear that the Shakopee area does have residents living at or near the poverty line. The current tier structure is particularly unfair to those people. We urge that the Commission address this issue in their review of potential tier rate structure changes. If you have any questions regarding the position of the City of Shakopee as stated herein, please feel free to call me at 445-6745. Sincerely, Gary L. Lau nt Mayor C: Mr. Richard R. Lancaster, Ex. Sec. Minnesota Public Utility Commission The Heart Of Progress Valley AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER c NOTICE OF METROPOLITAN COUNCIL PUBLIC MEETING SCOTT COUNTY MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COMPOST PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET The Metropolitan Council will hold a public meeting to receive comments on an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Scott County Municipal Solid Waste Compost Project. The county is proposing to construct a 200 ton-per-day municipal solid waste compost facility. The facility will serve both Scott and Carver Counties. The two counties will deliver municipal solid waste to the facility through their designation authority. The facility will be located on a site of approximately 35 acres in Louisville Township. Scott County will own the facility. The facility is anticipated to cost approximately $16 million, which Scott County will finance through issuance of revenue bonds and a $2 million capital assistance grant from the Minnesota Office of Waste Management. Scott County is currently negotiating a 20-year service agreement with Tyson Companies, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, as the private developer to construct and operate the facility. The project will utilize DANO compost equipment, a European compost technology. Scott County anticipates issuing a Notice to Proceed on the project in mid 1992. The project requires an EAW for which the Metropolitan Council is the responsible governmental unit. An EAW is a brief document to rapidly assess the environmental effects that may be associated with a proposed project. The EAW serves primarily to aid in the determination of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is needed for the proposed project. The EAW provides information regarding: the proposed project and project location; project site description, and land use and physical features of the surrounding area; resource protection measures incorporated into the project design;potential environmental impacts and issues that may require further investigation; and governmental approvals and the status of other applications. The EAW comment period begins Oct. 28, 1991, and written comments will be accepted through Nov. 27, 1991. A public meeting will be held Monday, Nov. 18, 1991, at the Scott County Courthouse to provide an opportunity for public comments. After the close of the comment period, the Council will prepare a response to comments and a recommendation on the need for an EIS. This report will be considered by the Council's Metropolitan Waste Management Advisory Committee and its Environmental Resources Committee before the Council makes its decision. PUBLIC MEETING INFORMATION When and Where: Monday, Nov. 18, 1991, 7 p.m. Scott County Courthouse 428 S. Holmes St. 3rd Floor, Rooms 318 and 319 Shakopee, Minn. Who Will Local officials Be Notified: Businesses Interested persons How to Participate: 1. You may attend the meeting and offer verbal or written comments. Please call Donna Mattson at 291-6493 if you wish to pre-register to speak. Speakers representing groups will be allowed to speak for 10 minutes and individuals will be given 5 minutes. 2. You may send a letter (must be received by 4 p.m. Nov. 27, 1991) with comments to: Paul Smith Metropoltian Council Mears Park Centre 230 E. Fifth St. St. Paul, MN 55101 3.Copies of the EAW have been provided to the following libraries for public review: Scott County Library System: Belle Plaine Library, 127 S. Cedar St., Belle Plaine Jordan Library, 230 S. Broadway, Jordan New Market Library, 50 Church St., New Market New Prague Library, 400 E. Main St., New Prague Prior Lake Library, 16244 Main St. SE., Prior Lake Savage Library, 4341 W. Hwy. 13, Savage Shakopee Library, 235 S. Lewis St., Shakopee Carver County Library System: Chaska Public Library, 3 City Hall Plaza, Chaska Chanhassen Public Library, 690 Coulter Dr., Chanhassen Waconia Public Library, 101 S. Elm St., Waconia Watertown Public Library, 201 Angel Av. SW., Watertown Young America Public Library, Main Street, Young America Metropolitan Council Library, 230 E. 5th St., St. Paul 4. Copies of the EAW are available free of charge. To request a copy, please call the Council's Data Center at 291-8140. Questions: Call the Council's Solid Waste Division and speak to Paul Smith (291-6408). O V E R V I E W SCOTT COUNTY MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COMPOST PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Project Description The proposed project is a 200 ton-per-day municipal solid waste resource recovery facility. The j facility will process mixed municipal solid waste into compost and,when necessary,serve as a transfer station. Ferrous metals will be recovered for recycling and provisions for expansion to recover other materials will be incorporated into the design. Wastes generated in Scott and Carver Counties will be designated for the facility, and excess capacity may be available for waste from other counties in the seven-county Metro Area. The facility will be located on an approximate 35 acres owned by Scott { County. The facility will be owned by Scott County, but it will be operated by a private corporation under contract with the county. Carver County will participate in the project through contractual commitments with Scott County. Design and construction is scheduled to take 19 months, which includes start-up and testing of the compost. Testing of the finished compost product occurs following the 19-month period. A Notice to Proceed on the project is expected to be made in July 1992. The cost of the project is anticipated to be approximately $16 million. The county will issue revenue bonds to finance the project. The county has selected Tyson Companies, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, as the project developer to construct and operate the facility, using European compost equipment called DANO technology. The size of the facility is designed to process the amount of waste anticipated after waste reduction and source separation of recyclable materials from the two counties for the 20-year life of the facility. Seasonal fluctuations in the amount of compost can be accommodated by varying the operational hours. The site has space for future construction of an area to receive waste ("tip floor"), and on, and additional primary "windrow" area for rows of composting material, and secondary windrow and storage areas to accommodate unforeseen growth in the waste stream. Typical operations assume 16 hours per day of processing for 5 1/2 days per week. Anticipated operation hours will be from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday; and 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. on Saturday. Extended hours may be required during months of peak waste generation. Environmental Impacts 1 Surface and Stormwater Runoff The site will be graded and bermed to prevent surface water run-on. All on-site runoff originating from areas not in contact with compost will be directed to a stormwater collection pond. Any surface -over- - METROPOLITAN COUNCIL,Mears Park Centre,230 E.Fifth St.,St.Paul,MN 55101 612 291-6359 water coming in contact with unfinished compost will be directed to a controlled pond that will be lined. All water from this pond will be pumped to a water tank and circulated to the composting facility where it will be applied to incoming waste. Sewage An on-site septic system will be installed to dispose of sewage generated from the facility. Dust Dust may be generated at the site during construction. The dust is not expected to occur at significant or harmful levels. If necessary, a water truck or other means of dust control will be used. Dust may be generated within the facility as incoming waste is deposited on the tipping floor, but is not expected to constitute a health risk. Dust may be generated during the compost final screening and finishing operation. This dust will be contained in the screening and finishing building. Noise Moderate levels of noise will be generated by the DANO processing drum, the conveyors and other processing equipment. However, most of this equipment will be located in a completely enclosed building. Noise will most likely be inaudible to people living nearby. Odors Odors could be a problem unless the site is properly managed. Odors will be controlled by composting the waste in an aerobic manner and by instituting a good housekeeping policy in and around the compost facility. The tipping floor and processing buildings will be maintained under negative air pressure to prevent odor from leaving enclosed areas. All exchanged air will be vented through the compost in the primary windrows where dust and odor will be filtered out. The air leaving the windrows will be further dispersed with high-velocity fans in the roof of the primary windrow building. Health Risks Recent analysis by the Minnesota Pollution Contral Agency has shown that potential exposures to chemicals during the composting processing and use of the finished compost product were within generally acceptable ranges. However, the agency's assessment points to a number of issues warranting additional study. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Regular Session October 3, 1991 MEMBERS PRESENT: Joos, Lynch, Spurrier, Kahleck, and Mars MEMBERS ABSENT : Allen and Christensen STAFF PRESENT Lindberg Ekola, City Planner Karen Marty, City Attorney Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner Dave Hutton, City Engineer Jane VanMaldeghem, Recording Secretary I. ROLL CALL Chairman Joos called the Board of Adjustments and Appeals to order at 7 : 30 p.m. Roll call was taken as noted above. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. III. APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 5, 1991, MEETING MINUTES The meeting minutes were approved as presented. IV. RECOGNITION OF INTERESTED CITIZENS Chrmn. Joos recognized anyone present in the audience wishing to speak on any item not on the agenda. There was no response. V. OTHER BUSINESS There was no further business. VI. ADJOURNMENT The meeting of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals was adjourned at 7 : 35 p.m. • SHAKOPEE PLANNING COMMISSION Shakopee, Minnesota Regular Session October 3, 1991 MEMBERS PRESENT: Spurrier, Kahleck, Joos, Lynch, and Mars ARRIVING LATE Christensen MEMBERS ABSENT : Allen STAFF PRESENT Lindberg Ekola, City Planner Karen Marty, City Attorney Dave Hutton, City Engineer Terrie Sandbeck, Assistant City Planner Jane VanMaldeghem, Recording Secretary I . ROLL CALL Chrmn. Kahleck called the meeting of the Shakopee Planning Commission to order at 7:35 p.m. Roll call was taken as - noted above. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Vacation of cartways was moved up on the agenda to precede the Link rezoning public hearing. The agenda was then approved as amended. III. APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 5, 1991, MEETING MINUTES The meeting minutes were approved as presented. IV. RECOGNITION OF INTERESTED CITIZENS Chrmn. Kahleck recognized anyone in the audience wishing to speak on any item not on the agenda. There was no response. Comm. Christensen arrived at 7:40 p.m. and took her seat. V. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 624 - AMES Chrmn. Kahleck opened the public hearing to consider the application for a conditional use permit for mineral extraction and land rehabilitation on a parcel located on Valley View Road; applicant, Raymond Ames. The City Planner stated the conditional use permit for mineral extraction is for borrow area of 49 . 6 acres with excavation area covering 35.5 acres, located north of Valley View Road and east of County Road 17. The City Planner added that on September 17 , 1991, the City Council adopted a zoning Shakopee Planning Commission Page 2 , Meeting Minutes October 3 , 1991 ordinance amendment that will go into effect November 7, 1991, deleting mineral extraction as a conditional use in the agricultural and rural residential districts. The City Planner stated that a letter dated October 1, 1991, has been received from Allen Frechette of the Scott County Environmental Health Department urging the city to require a ground water impact assessment for this proposal. Chrmn. Kahleck asked for comments from the audience. James Hill, consultant for Raymond Ames, responded to the concerns of staff, as addressed in the staff memo of September 27 , 1991. He stated that they have met all of the obligations for the conditional use permit and made the following additional remarks: 1) The reason no driveway or access roads are shown on the applicant ' s map is because they will use the haul road. 2) The dust on the road would be controlled by a water truck with on-site water available to control on-site dust. 3) The noise impact is reduced with the distance; the first resident living 1200 feet from the proposed mining operation. 4) The scheduled time for beginning the proposed mining operations is dependent upon the construction of the bypass. 5) He stated if there is any ground water flow it would follow the natural contour -- downward. 6) The hours of operation will be according to city ordinance. 7) Reclamation is for the land to be returned to farming. 8) This operation will not open if the bypass does not require their fill , or if they cannot obtain an easement for the haul road. Mr. Hill stated the applicant is requesting the Planning Commission not require a discretionary EAW for the proposal, but obtain the required information on the proposal, prepare the final review report, and continue the public hearing to a meeting date prior to November 7, 1991, the date the new Ordinance Amendment will go into effect. Comm. Spurrier questioned if the windrow and stacking is considered as a part of the 35 . 5 acres of excavation. He was informed that it is not, but that would be an additional two acres. Comm. Spurrier stated this should be included as a part of the active excavation area. Comm. Spurrier questioned the grade of the slope and was informed the slope grade is to be 5 : 1, but Mr. Hill added they have no problem complying with the finished slope of 18 percent, which is a 6 : 1 slope. Shakopee Planning Commission Page 3 . Meeting Minutes October 3 , 1991 Raymond Ames, applicant, stated they would guarantee the return of a 3 inch topsoil. Comm. Spurrier then questioned if this wasn't light for farming. Mr. Hill agreed, and added that 3 inches is the minimum requirement per city code. The applicant added that since this area is going to be returned to farming, they will need whatever topsoil replacement is necessary for this purpose. Comm. Christensen questioned the truck route and the impact on traffic. The applicant informed Comm. Christensen that when there is a need for land fill, the fill goes directly to the bypass site, but the design of the haul road is of yet undetermined. He added that roadway designation can be provided, should this be requested by the Planning Commission. He added that, at this time, the truck volume per day is unknown, but he believes the maximum trucks per day would be no more than 20. Mr. Ames added that there will be no structure built, but a crew trailer may be placed on the site for an office or break room. Mr. Ames stated he had not indicated any phasing plan in his conditional use permit application, but this would be submitted. Engelbert Breeggemann questioned the drainage to his property, which is north of the proposed mining operation. Discussion was centered around the need for an EAW. Russell Strefland, attorney for Raymond Ames, stated he wished to respond to the question asked earlier of Mr. Ames; whereby he was asked if he had known of the ordinance change. Mr. Strefland stated he was not informed of this change. He also stated that, if the Planning Commission requests an EAW, this would constitute a change of the rules in the "middle of the game" , and would kill the application if it were not approved prior to November 7, 1991, because an EAW could not be completed in time to meet the adoption of the new ordinance. Chrmn. Kahleck stated that the policy of the Planning Commission is to require an EAW in most cases, unless the mining excavation proposal is minor in nature. She added that this information had been passed on to the City Council. Mr. Strefland stated the application and fees had been Med and paid. He questioned why they should spend the add3iional money on an EAW just to have the ordinance take effect, Miich would ultimately preclude this application. He suggested the action of the Planning Commission should be to reques,i. any Shakopee Planning Commission Page 4 . Meeting Minutes October 3, 1991 added information needed to make a decision, and judge the application on the merit of the ordinance in place at the time of the application, not on an ordinance later adopted. He questioned how many other applications would be affected by the new ordinance. He was informed one other application is currently in process. Chrmn. Kahleck stated the applicant had been informed of the proposed ordinance amendment at the time of his application. Mr. Strefland questioned why the application fee had been accepted by the city. The response was that the City cannot deny any application. The City Attorney stated the ordinance has been adopted, and once it is in effect, it cannot be ignored. This message had been passed on to the applicant. Mr. Strefland stated his disagreement with the statement that once an ordinance is in place all retroactive applications are - affected. Mr. Ames stated that he believes the Planning Commission does not understand the difference between his mining proposal and others that have come before them. He stated that his proposal is different because it is being proposed only for use in conjunction with the bypass and with no other project. Someone will get the contract for bypass fill, and he would like to be able to be the contractor. He added that this area is not the best for farming, and that his business is hauling fill. He stated he would be happy to put a bond up, and would only perform the operation if the neighbors allow the haul road easement because he is in a landlocked situation. Comm. Spurrier stated he is against allowing this proposal to fail just because the applicant cannot get all of the information together prior to the date that the ordinance goes into effect. He added the EAW provides a lot of information on groundwater, but that he would be willing to continue without the EAW if the applicant could present the following pertinent information prior to the next public hearing: 1) Quality of restoration; 2) Protection of groundwater during and after the activity; and 3) Dust control during the activity. Motion: Christensen/Joos moved to continue the public hearing to October 17, 1991. Comm. Mars requested that the phasing maps and a sediment control plan be reviewed by the City Engineer. Shakopee Planning Commission Page 5 . Meeting Minutes October 3, 1991 The applicant stated that all the information would oe provided to the Planning Commission by the October 17 meeting date. The Planning Commission once again discussed the need for an EAW. Mr. Strefland again reminded the Planning Commission that this application is only for one project, the bypass. The City Planner stated that it is not possible for the applicant to process the EAW prior to November 7, because of all the notification deadlines. The City Attorney stated that this project is not really large enough to warrant an EAW, but that would have to be the decision of the Planning Commission. She added that the EAW requires a lot of mailings and takes a lot of time. She added that if the Planning Commission is seeking detailed information, this could be requested without the EAW hearing - process. The City Engineer stated that he believes the applicant would be able to provide the information requested, and the only thing missing by not going through the official EAW would be additional public comment. Comm. Spurrier stated he would like to see the following: 1) The site stay compact by flagging the boundary. The application should flag the area to be disturbed by using a specific legal description. 2) In rehabilitation of the land, the finished slope shall not exceed 18 percent, and he would like to see the plan revised to meet this requirement. 3) An expert should determine the amount of fill to be placed back on this site so that farming may occur after the rehabilitation. 4) Vehicular storage needs to be addressed for the time the borrow is required. 5) Drainage needs to be addressed so there is no erosion, especially as it relates to Mr. Breeggemann's property. Mr. Ames stated he can have the information requested, as long as he doesn't have to depend on another government agency to meet any deadlines. Chrmn. Kahleck stated that prior to the operation, the conditional use permit should be reviewed for road designation, as well as screening. Shakopee Planning Commission Page 6 . Meeting Minutes October 3 , 1991 Vote: Motion carried unanimously. VI. PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 375 - SHIELY COMPANY Chrmn. Kahleck opened the public hearing to consider an application to amend the conditional use permit for mining, which would allow the applicants to expand excavations to the west side of their property at 6896 Hwy. 101. The City Planner stated that J. L. Shiely Company submitted an application to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 375 in order to expand their mining operations on the western 80. 5 acres of their property, located south of Hwy 101. The City Planner stated that Staff has received a letter from the FMG/Tsumura Corporation stating their concerns about blasting in the existing quarry, and a letter from John Albinson of Valley Green Business Park requesting that they be allowed more time to analyze the proposal. Bob Bieraugel , Environmental Affairs for the J. L. Shiely Co. , was present for discussion, and stated that their request is just for the removal of sand, not limestone. Their desire to expand is for the bypass and the pending bridge projects. They have no problem with the EAW process for the entire western expansion, but, at this time they are looking for a decision from the Planning Commission on expanding their operations into 35 acres for immediate project negotiations, for which they are under a time frame. He added his surprise with the concerns of their neighbors, as addressed in the letters from FMG and Valley Green. Dick Peterson, attorney for Valley Green Business Park, stated they had not been given enough time to address all the issues of concern. He added that the initial permit was granted in 1967 , before information on water pumping was a requirement. The applicant has also not addressed other wetlands. He also stated that the quality of the water is in question, by the volume of the pumping. He asked that they be given the time to submit a proper presentation. Jonathan Williamshurst, General Manager for J. L. Shiely, stated the project they will be servicing is the Bloomington Ferry Bridge project. They would be willing to provide a written agreement that an EAW would be obtained, but can assure the City that they have no plans for limestone removal for about five years. Shakopee Planning Commission Page 7 . Meeting Minutes October 3 , 1991 Mr. Peterson asked for some assurance that only the windrow of 200, 000 cubic yards would be used, which is the overburden from other parts of the Shiely operations and anything more should initiate an EAW. The City Planner stated he believes a mandatory EAW would be required for the requested amendment to the conditional use permit. Motion: Joos/Lynch moved to continue the public hearing to November 7, 1991, to allow for further testimony from other property owners. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. VII. VACATION OF CARTWAYS The City Engineer stated that the City Council has set a public hearing for October 15, 1991, to consider the vacation of three cartways; Breeggemann, Mielke, and Petsch. He added that according to Minnesota statutes, the Planning Commission needs to review the proposed vacations to be sure they do not conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City Eng. stated that in 1972 , the City of Shakopee and Eagle Creek Township consolidated, whereby all the township roads and maintenance responsibilities were inherited by the City. There are three previously owned township roads that have been called "cartways" because, in staff' s opinion, these are basically driveways and there is some question if they are serving a public purpose. He added that, based on the need for financial reductions, Staff would like the City Council to reconsider the maintenance obligations of these cartways, and would also provide any future subdivisions the freedom to designate necessary rights-of-way or easements through the platting process in these areas. The City Eng. stated the first cartway vacation being considered is the Mielke driveway, a 16 foot wide gravel roadway extending south of County Road 42 for approximately 0. 6 miles. There are five other property owners adjacent to this driveway. One of the adjacent properties, the Stemmer property, as well as the Mielke property, have residents on this driveway. The other parcels are vacant. The City Eng. added that information had just been received that the Mdewakanton Sioux has purchased the Mielke property and pending development may result in a roadway to County Road 83 . Shakopee Planning Commission Page 8 , Meeting Minutes October 3 , 1991 City Eng. stated the second cartway being proposed for vacation is the Breeggemann driveway, which extends east of County Road 17 for approximately . 25 miles. This driveway has no gravel base, nor is it suitable for vehicular traffic. This driveway is not normally plowed during the winter since the road is basically used as a field access for farm equipment. The third cartway being proposed for vacation is the Petsch driveway, extending east of McKenna Road for approximately 0. 6 miles. This driveway serves the currently vacant farm house owned by Clarence Petsch. This driveway has a substandard gravel base and is about 8 to 10 feet wide. The City has been maintaining the first 0.2 miles of this driveway. Comm. Spurrier stated that the arrangement between the City and the township was to maintain these driveways in exchange for Eagle Creek joining the City of Shakopee. Comm. Mars questioned the savings. The City Eng. responded - that he did not have those figures available. When questioned how the Stemmer parcel and Mielke parcel could share the same driveway, the City Eng. responded that prior to 1981, two parcels sharing the same access was permitted. He added that in 1983 , the City agreed to maintain this road with the condition that a 50 foot roadway be dedicated. He added that according to available records, this dedication was never recorded. Martin Theis presented the document that should have been filed for a 50 foot easement, stating it had not been recorded. He voiced his opposition to the vacation of the Mielke driveway. Mr. Breeggemann stated the City has not maintained the road for eight years and doesn 't need the City to maintain it now, but he still needs the road. The City Eng. responded this road is currently maintained only upon request. Gene Hauer, owner of land adjacent to the Breeggemann driveway stated he needs the road, and that this road is not causing the City any expense. He requested the road remain as it currently exists. Chrmn. Kahleck asked for comments regarding the vacation of the Petsch cartway. There was no response. Norbert Theis stated that at the time of annexation, the City promised to provide service to these roadways and now is Shakopee Planning Commission Page 9 . Meeting Minutes October 3 , 1991 trying to get rid of these roads. He stated that the City cannot vacate roadways with parcels. Bill Reneke presented a letter from the Mdewakanton Sioux dated October 3, 1991, requesting the Mielke cartway not be vacated. Jeanette Stemmer stated that if the Mielke cartway were vacated, no emergency equipment would be able to get back to their parcel. She asked if the road were to be upgraded, who would pay for this upgrading. The City Eng. responded that any upgrading would be assessed 100 percent to the adjoining property owners. Pat Pulberg questioned if the Mdewakanton Sioux would share in any of the road upgrade cost. Rick Carlson stated he has purchased 20 acres in the southeast corner of the Mielke parcel. He added that he has a private easement agreement with Mr. Mielke for use of this driveway - because the area he purchased is landlocked. He stated that he is in opposition to the vacation of the Mielke cartway. Harry Weinandt stated his opposition to the vacation of all three cartways because the city got what they wanted and now should maintain all cartways. Mr. Breeggemann stated that when he was part of the Eagle Creek Township, his cartway was maintained. Motion: Spurrier/Lynch moved that vacation of these cartways would create landlock parcels of property, which is in opposition to the Comprehensive Plan and, therefore, is recommending to the City Council that these cartways not be vacated. Comm. Christensen asked for cost effectiveness to the City, and questioned the landlock issue. He stated that, based upon this information, if it's cost effective, and landlocking is not a problem, sees no reason not to vacate the Petsch and Breeggemann cartways. However, she does not believe enough information has been presented to vote on this issue. Comm. Spurrier stated that in order to vacate, the road must not be serving a public purpose, which can be addressed by the level of service a cartway receives. Vote: Ayes - Lynch, Spurrier, Mars Noes - Joos, Kahleck, Christensen Motion failed Shakopee Planning Commission Page 10 . Meeting Minutes October 3 , 1991 Motion: Christensen/Lynch moved that the Planning Commission support the Comprehensive Plan, which is in opposition to landlocking parcels. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. The Planning Commission recessed at 10: 30 p.m. and reconvened at 10:45 p.m. VIII .PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING PARCEL FROM RTD TO I-1 - LARRY AND DON LINK Chrmn Kahleck opened the public hearing to consider an application for the rezoning of a parcel on County Road 83 (formerly the Velodrome) from the Racetrack District to Light Industrial . The City Planner stated the applicant has requested a continuation of the public hearing for the presentation of - further information. Chrmn. Kahleck asked for comments from the audience. There was no response. Motion: Joos/Spurrier moved to continue the public hearing to November 7 , 1991, on the request to rezone the east 469 feet of Lot 1, Block, 1, Barringer' s 1st Addition from RTD to I-1 . Vote: Motion carried unanimously. IX. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 620 - RAHR MALTING Chrmn. Kahleck opened the public hearing to consider an application for a conditional use permit to allow an over- height building to be erected at 800 West 1st Avenue. The Assistant City Planner stated the applicant is requesting a conditional use permit for three structures in excess of 45 feet in height. The three structures are a malt tower, a kiln building, and a rail load-out building. She added the height of these structures will not interfere with existing or future flight approach areas and that Rahr Malting is not anticipating any additional employees so parking would not be impacted by the new facility. John Alsip, president of Rahr Malting, stated that the expansion would not create an increase in truck traffic because their primary method of transportation is through the railroad. He added that Rahr has constructed on-site Shakopee Planning Commission Page 11 . Meeting Minutes October 3, 1991 facilities for trucks currently waiting in line so that waiting trucks would not be a problem on 3rd Avenue. Dan Hemison of Rahr Malting stated Rahr has instructed their truck traffic to try to avoid as much of the residential area as possible. Comm. Mars questioned if Rahr Malting had considered landscaping along Apgar Street or 3rd Avenue. He was informed that the portion of land in question on Apgar Street belongs to the railroad, but it was agreed by Mr. Alsip that Rahr could provide better landscaping along 3rd Avenue. Chrmn. Kahleck asked for comments from the audience. There were none. Chrmn. Kahleck closed the public hearing. Motion: Joos/Christensen offered Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. PC-620, a conditional use permit granting construction of three buildings in excess of the 45 foot - height limitation in the I-2 zone, for the: 1) Malt tower, total of 265 feet in height 2) Kiln building, total of 100 feet in height 3) Rail load-out, total of 73 .9 feet in height and moved for its adoption, subject to the condition that the applicant submit a landscaping plan of the entire Rahr Malting site (including all properties owned by Rahr) , indicating proposed vegetation and screening features necessary to bring the proposed structures into compliance with City Code requirements prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, and further conditioned that all landscaping and screening improvements be completed within two years. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. X. PUBLIC HEARING: RENEWAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 273 - SYLVESTER GEROLD Chrmn. Kahleck opened the public hearing to consider an application for renewal of a conditional use permit, which would allow the applicant continued use of a mobile home on his family farm at 2499 Canterbury Road; applicant, Sylvester Gerold. The Assistant City Planner gave the history stating that- : 1) On August 24, 1976, the City Council granted a conditional use permit for Daniel Gerold to place a mobile home on his father's farm for a period of three Shakopee Planning Commission Page 12 . Meeting Minutes October 3 , 1991 years to provide temporary living quarters for Daniel Gerold while working with his father in the family farming operation. The permit was approved with the condition it could only be renewed two times, thereby, expiring the conditional use permit on September 1, 1979 . This conditional use permit was renewed November 22 , 1977 , and September 19 , 1978 . 2) On August 23 , 1979, Daniel Gerold moved. In March of 1980, Daniel Gerold sold and removed the mobile home from the farmstead. At that time Daniel ' s brother, John Gerold placed a new mobile home on the property. On April 15, 1981, Sylvester Gerold was informed that, by placing the new mobile home on the farmstead, he was in violation of the zoning ordinance. Mr. Gerold was to either permanently remove the mobile home from the farm or apply for a new conditional use permit. 3) On May 14 , 1981, Mr. Gerold was granted Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 273 , allowing John Gerold to occupy a mobile home as temporary living quarters while assisting with the family farming operations. 4) On May 5, 1983 , the Planning Commission approved the transfer of Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 273 from John Gerold to Lee Gerold. 5) On July 10, 1986, the Planning Commission approved an amendment to Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 273 , reissuing the permit for an additional five years, or until May 14 , 1991. 6) Jamie Gerold has now submitted an application for conditional use permit renewal to live in this mobile home while he works on the family farm still owned by Sylvester Gerold. Staff recommends renewal since no complaints have been received regarding this mobile home. Sylvester Gerold was present for discussion. Chrmn. Kahleck asked for comments from the audience. There were none. Chrmn. Kahleck closed the public hearing. Motion: Joos/Lynch offered renewal to Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 273 , allowing a mobile home in the Agricultural zoning district, and moved for its adoption, subject to the following conditions: Shakopee Planning Commission Page 13 . Meeting Minutes October 3, 1991 1) The conditional use permit be reviewed on an annual basis. 2) The mobile home may be placed on the property for five years. 3) The mobile home shall not be used as a rental unit and shall not be occupied by anyone other than the applicant and family. 4) The mobile home shall utilize tie-downs. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. XI. PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO CITY CODE, SECTION 11. 29, SUBD. 2 Chrmn. Kahleck opened the public hearing to consider an amendment to the Shakopee City Code, Section 11.29, Subd. 2, to clarify the terminology in the permitted uses list in Subd. 2 .A. The Assistant City Planner stated that, currently the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance lists motor homes as a permitted use within the Highway Business (B-1) zone. This is a result of an error in copying and updating the zoning ordinance which was adopted on April 1, 1978. Staff recommend this be corrected. Chrmn. Kahleck asked for comments from the audience. There were none. Comm. Spurrier questioned the priority of this amendment being brought before the Planning Commission. The City Planner stated that this is necessary to clean up the ordinance to prevent any future complications due to the error. Motion: Christensen/Joos moved to recommend to the City Council the proposed ordinance amendment, replacing "motor homes" with "motor motels" and to clarify the terminology in the list of permitted uses within the Highway Business district. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. XII. DISCUSSION: REZONING - 5TH AVENUE AND MARKET STREET Motion: Christensen/Lynch moved to direct staff to initiate the rezoning process from R-2 to R-3 with a small portion rezoned to R-4, and set the public hearing for November 7, 1991. Shakopee Planning Commission Page 14 . Meeting Minutes October 3 , 1991 Vote: Ayes - Lynch, Christensen, Mars, Kahleck, Joos Noes - Spurrier (not following priorities as established by the Planning Commission) . Motion carried. XIII.OTHER BUSINESS : ALLEY IN BLOCK 42 - FLORENCE GREENING The Assistant City Planner stated that on September 5, 1991, the Planning Commission requested that Staff research the 1968 vacation of the alley in Block 42 , City of Shakopee Plat, and study the feasibility of reopening the alley. The Assistant City Planner stated Florence Greening, 715 West 4th Avenue, has a residential home on Lots 3 and 4 , Block 42 , City of Shakopee Plat. The back of her home (facing the alley) contains a tuck-under garage. Not being aware that this alley had been vacated, she has been using it to get to her garage over the past 23 years. A site inspection on September 20, 1991, revealed that the access drive to Ms. Greening ' s garage is situated across the southern edge of the - vacated alley, on what is now the northern edge of Lots 3 , 4 , and 5 , Block 42 , with approximately 60 feet of it crossing the edge of her neighbor' s property. The Assistant City Planner added that Ms. Greening may wish to obtain an easement from her neighbor in order to legally continue using this access. The City Planner stated that Ms. Greening could hire an attorney to prepare the easement document that would give Ms. Greening the right to cross her neighbor' s property for access to her garage, but she would not own the easement. The Assistant City Planner stated that staff looked into opening the alley, but the topography is of such a nature that this is not possible. The City Eng. stated that, if Mrs. Greening desires the alley to be opened, she could petition for it with the proper number of signatures. This action would also include acquiring the vacated alley from adjacent property owners, but this would create an additional expense. Florence Greening was present for discussion. The Planning Commission stated the only options available to Ms. Greening to either contact an attorney to acquire a legal easement for access to her garage, or to petition the City for the opening of the alley. Doug Greening stated there are a number of issues that have to be considered with either of the alternatives given by the Planning Commission: Shakopee Planning Commission age 1 Meeting Minutes October 3, 199 1) Access to the 2) Salabilit garage 3) a1abin y of her property without g y of the proposed recycling business the impact of this operation on Ms. Greenin ' and He asked if anyone g s property. area. The Cit else ad requested such request, y Planner ponded that an alley for this he was unaware of any XIV. ADJOURNMENT ns Christeen/Joos moved for adjournment. Ch ri ens Meeting adjourned at OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Special Session October 17, 1991 MEMBERS PRESENT: Kahleck, Joos, Spurrier, Mars, Allen MEMBERS ABSENT: Lynch, Christensen STAFF PRESENT: Lindberg Ekola, City Planner Jane VanMaldeghem, Recording Secretary Chrmn. Kahleck called the Special Session of the Shakopee Planning Commission to order at 7: 30 p.m. , in the Scott County Courthouse; members present as noted above. I. PUBLIC HEARING: MINERAL EXTRACTION/LAND REHABILITATION - MCKENNA Chrmn. Kahleck continued the public hearing to consider an application for mineral extraction and land rehabilitation and a conditional use permit for gravel mining. The City Planner stated that a letter was received in City Hall October 17, 1991 from James Townsend on behalf of the Mdewakanton Sioux Community. Mr. Townsend is requesting the public hearing be continued to give the Mdewakanton Sioux time to execute a purchase agreement for the McKenna property being proposed for gravel mining operations. The City Planner added that Mr. McKenna is reluctant to withdraw his application for gravel mining and land rehabilitation until he has the purchase agreement. He added continuation of the public hearing would provide ample time for the execution of the purchase agreement, yet not close the public hearing for Mr. McKenna. Chrmn. Kahleck read into the record the letter dated October 17, 1991, submitted to the Shakopee Planning Commission from Dennis Kraft, City Administrator. This letter explains the status of the mediation proceedings between David and Richard McKenna, the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community, the City of Prior Lake, the Metropolitan Council and the City of Shakopee. This letter reiterated the pending purchase agreement. Mr. Kraft recommended the continuation of the public hearing to October 30, 1991. • • Minutes of the Page - 2 Shakopee Planning Commission October 17, 1991 The City Planner stated the intentions of the McKenna property being purchased by the Mdewakanton Sioux is still unknown. The Mdewakanton Sioux does not want this type of operation next to their housing units. Chrmn. Kahleck asked for questions from the audience. There was no response. Joos/Allen moved to continue the public hearing to October 31, 1991. Motion carried unanimously. II. PUBLIC HEARING: MINERAL EXTRACTION/LAND REHABILITATION - AMES Chrmn. Kahleck continued the public hearing to consider an application for mineral extraction and land rehabilitation and a conditional use permit for gravel mining. The City Planner stated the applicant has not had adequate - time to prepare the requested information for tonight's meeting and has asked the public hearing be continued. The City Planner added that the information on the impact to ground and surface water is still pending. James Hill, engineering consultant, was present for discussion. Comm. Spurrier voiced his discontent with continuation of the public hearing to another date and another special session. Chrmn. Kahleck asked for comments from the audience. Dave Czaja presented some written background information on ground water in the Dean's Lake area. There were no further comments from the audience. Mars/Allen moved to continue the public hearing to October 31, 1991. Motion carried with Comm. Spurrier voting "no" . III. ADJOURNMENT Mars/Allen moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8: 15 p.m. TENTATIVE AGENDA 9 PLANNING COMMISSION • Regular Session Shakopee, MN November 7, 1991 Chairperson Melanie Kahleck Presiding 1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of Agenda 3 . Approval of the October 3 and 17, 1991, Meeting Minutes 4 . Recognition by Planning Commission of Interested Citizens. 5. 7 : 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the application for a conditional use permit to operate a pet grooming business at a residence. Applicant: Deborah Snyder Action: Conditional Use Permit No. 626 6. 7 : 40 P.M. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application to amend the conditional use permit for mining - which would allow the applicants to expand excavations to the west side of their property at 6896 Hwy. 101. Applicant: J. L. Shiely Company Action: Amend Conditional Use Permit No. 375 7 . 7 : 50 P.M. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for the rezoning of a parcel on County Rd. 83 (Formerly the Velodrome) from Racetrack (RTD) to Light Industrial (I-1) . Applicants: Larry and Don Link 8 . DISCUSSION: Rezoning - 5th Avenue and Market 9 . 1992 Calendar - Board of Adjustment and Appeals and Planning Commission 10 . Other Business a. Zoning Enforcement - 4-Plex Parking b. Interim Ordinance Update - Verbal c. Pre-application Meetings d. Planning Commission Appointments - (2 Commissioner terms scheduled to expire on 1-31-92) e. f. g. 11. Adjourn Lindberg S . Ekola City Planner NOTE TO PLANNING MEMBERS: 1. If you have any questions or need additional information on any of the above items, please call Terrie or Aggie on the Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting at 445-3650. 2 . If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting. v) TENTATIVE AGENDA BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Regular Session Shakopee, MN November 7 , 1991 Chairperson Terry Joos Presiding 1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of Agenda 3 . Approval of October 3 , 1991, Meeting Minutes 4 . Recognition by Board of Adjustments and Appeals of Interested Citizens. 5 . 7 : 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application for a variance to the required outside building materials and a variance to the front yard setback. Applicant: Rahr Malting Company Action: Resolution No. 625 6. Other Business a. b. c. 7 . Adjourn Lindberg S. Ekola City Planner NOTE TO THE B.O.A.A. MEMBERS: 1. If you have any questions or need additional information on any of the above items, please call Terrie or Aggie on the Monday or Tuesday prior to the meeting. 2 . If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting. *11 MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Comprehensive Sewer Plan DATE: October 29, 1991 INFORMATIONAL ITEM FOR COUNCIL At the October 15, 1991 City Council meeting, the Council authorized the appropriate City officials to execute a contract with Short-Elliott-Hendrickson (SEH) to prepare a Comprehensive Sewer Plan. The City Council had one question regarding the wage rates that would be included in this contract. Attached is the wage scale for the various position classifications of SEH. This wage scale will be made a part of the contract and attached to it. DH/pmp SCHEDULE HOURLY BILLABLE COST BY CLASSIFICATION(1 ) CLASSIFICATION BILLABLE COST( 1 ) OFFICE STAFF Principal Engineer $79.35 -$111.10 Project Manager $61.90 -$102.35 Project Engineer/Architect/Planner $49.20 - $79 .35 Design Engineer/Architect/Planner $34.95 - $61.90 Lead Technician $41.20 - $60.30 Senior Technician $38.15 - $51.55 Technician $28.55 - $42.40 Associate Technician $24.60 - $32.30 Word Processor $24.60 - $35. 50 General Clerical $20. 65 - $35.50 FIELD STAFF Lead Project Representative $41.20 - $58.80 Sr. Project Representative $33.35 - $48.15 Project Representative $25.45 - $38.15 Survey Party Chief $35.70 - $56.35 Survey Assistant $22.30 - $31.75 (1) The actual cost charged is dependent upon the hourly rate of the employee assigned to the project. The costs shown are subject to change. Issued: April 1, 1991 Expires: April 12, 1992 TENTATIVE AGENDA • SPECIAL SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 6, 1991 -- WEDNESDAY -- Mayor Gary Laurent presiding Presentation by Shakopee Jaycees of a check to the Mayor Presentation by the Shakopee Eagles of a check to the Mayor 1] Roll Call at 7: 00 P.M. 2] Approval of Agenda 3] Recess for H.R.A. Meeting 4] Re-convene 5] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 6] Mayor's Report 7] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 8] Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. ) 9] Approval of the Minutes of October 1, 8 , and 15, 1991 10] Communications: a] Letter from Canterbury Downs 11] Public Hearings: None 12] Boards and Commissions: None 13] Reports from Staff: a] Application for A Massage Center License b] Property Negotiations - Moratorium Area c] Creation of Municipal Facility Needs Assessment Committee *d] Municipal Facility Funding Options e] Res. No. 3483 , Early Retirement Policy - tabled 10/15 *f] Scott County Economic Development Coalition Joint Powers Agreement Amendments *g] 1992 - 1996 Capital Improvement Program *h] Appointment of LMC/AMM Voting Representative *i] MnDOT Parking Lot Lease TENTATIVE AGENDA November 6, 1991 Page -2- 13] Reports from Staff continued: *j ] Buy Back of Police Holiday Time *k] Naming New City Parks *1] Request for Release of A Watermain Looping Agreement *m] Approval Bills in the Amount of $182 , 186 . 27 *n] Boards and Commissions Expiring Terms *0] Chainsaw Purchase 14] Resolutions and Ordinances: *a] Res. No. 3486 - Amending 1991 Budget *b] Res. No. 3490 - Authorizing Indemnification Agreements for the Fire Department c] Res. No. 3485 - Canvassing Election Returns *d] Res. No. 3488 - Accepting Work on Valley Industrial Blvd. No. , Project 1990-8 *e] Res. No. 3484 - Approving One Day Off-Site Gambling License for the Lion' s Club *f] Res. No. 3489 - Accepting Gambling Funds from the Eagles - *g] Res. No. 3487 - Amending City Vehicle Policy 15] Other Business: a] Legal Opinion on The Use of TIF Surplus Funds b] c] d] 16] Recess for an executive session to discuss pending litigation 17] Re-convene 18] Adjourn to Tuesday, November 19 , 1991, at 7 : 00 p.m. Dennis R. Kraft City Administrator TENTATIVE AGENDA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting November 6, 1991 1. Roll Call at 7: 00 P.M. 2 . Approval of the October 1, 1991 Meeting Minutes 3 . Rehab Grant Program Application 4 . Other Business a) b) 5. Adjourn Dennis R. Kraft Executive Director OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 1, 1991 Chrmn. Zak called the meeting to order at 7: 10 p.m. , with Comm. Vierling, Sweeney, and Wampach present; absent, Comm. Clay. Also present: Dennis Kraft, City Admn. ; Barry Stock, Ass't. City Admn. ; Dave Hutton, City Eng. ; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; Judith Cox, City Clerk; and Karen Marty, City Attorney. Wampach/Sweeney moved to approve the meeting minutes of September 3, 1991, as presented. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion was held on the potential for rezoning property along the abandoned railroad line from R-2 to a higher density. Sweeney/Vierling moved to direct the appropriate H.R.A officials to submit a letter to the Planning Commission requesting that they consider initiating a rezoning of the study area to R-3 (Medium - Density Residential) with a small portion to be rezoned to R-4 (Multi-Family Residential) . Motion carried unanimously. There was no other business. Vierling/Wampach moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 7 : 15 p.m. Dennis Kraft Executive Director Jane VanMaldeghem Recording Secretary MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, Executive Director, Shakopee HRA FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Rehab Grant Program Application DATE: October 24 , 1991 INTRODUCTION: A rehab Grant Program Application has been submitted by Mr. John Larson, owner of the Tolebridge building located at 102 East 1st Avenue. BACKGROUND: This past February the Shakopee HRA moved to continue the Rehab Grant Program through 1991. Mr. Larson is proposing to repair several display windows and replace the roof on his building. The improvements presented by Mr. Larson in his application are eligible program costs. Mr. Larson has received cost estimates for the improvements. The total estimated project cost is $6, 823 . 75. Therefore, Mr. Larson is requesting grant assistance in the amount of $1, 705. 94 (25% of total cost) . When the HRA continued the program earlier this year they allocated $34 , 000. 00 in grant funds to the program. No other grant applications have been received in 1991. Therefore, funding is available for the grant application request as submitted. The design review team has met to review the application and to consider making a recommendation to the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority. The review team has found that the application and proposed improvements are in accordance with the Rehab Grant Program Guidelines. Therefore, they are recommending approval of the grant application request as submitted. ALTERNATIVES : 1. Authorize the appropriate HRA officials to execute a Rehab Grant Program Agreement by and between the Shakopee HRA and John Larson for a grant amount not to exceed $1, 705 . 94 . 2 . Table action on approving the grant application request. 3 . Do not approve funding the grant application request submitted by Mr. John Larson. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to authorize the appropriate HRA officials to execute a Rehab Grant Program Agreement by and between the Shakopee HRA and John Larson for a grant amount not to exceed $1, 705. 94 . BAS/tiv OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 1, 1991 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 7 : 00 p.m. , with Cncl. Vierling, Wampach, Zak and Sweeney present; absent, Cncl . Clay. Also present: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator; Dave Hutton, City Engineer; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; Judith Cox, City Clerk; and Karen Marty, City Attorney. The following item was removed from Consent Business: 12a) Eagle Creek Junction 3rd Addition - Request for appraisal in order to establish park dedication fee. The following items were added to Consent Business and/or Other Business: 13d) 5th Avenue Improvements, Project No. 1989-4 and 15a) Authorizing the hiring of a police officer. The following items were added to Other Business: 15b) Replacement of a fire truck, and 15c) Executive session. Sweeney/Vierling moved to approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried unanimously. The City Council recessed to the meeting of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority at 7 : 10 p.m. Mayor Laurent reconvened the City Council at 7 : 15 p.m. Liaison reports were given by the Councilmembers. Mayor Laurent presented the Mayor' s report on his attendance at various meetings. Mayor Laurent asked if there was anyone from the audience who wished to address the City Council _on issues not on the agenda. Rod Krass, attorney, was present to discuss the pending relocation of Brambilla Motors and Jack Brambilla ' s request for assistance from the city. Mr. Krass presented a petition containing 24 signatures of names voicing no objection to the Brambilla relocation request. Mr. Krass also presented a letter from Jon Albinson dated June 12 , 1991, citing no objection to Brambilla Motors moving into the industrial zone and quoting a selling price for acreage in the Valley Green Business Park. Mr. Krass added that the deadline date for relocation was changed from October 30 , 1991, to April 20, 1992 , giving more time for reconsideration of the recent action made by the City Council for no rezoning changes. City Attorney stated that according to Roberts Rules of Order, which has been adopted by the City Council , a motion to reconsider cannot be taken after the original motion has been adopted. She added, the only way to change the action is to start over and according to the City Code, the rezoning request from Brambilla Motors cannot be examined for another six months unless changed evidence or valid grounds are first presented to the Planning Commission. Official Proceedings of the October 1, 1991 Shakopee City Council Page -2- Zak/Wampach moved to suspend Robert ' s Rules of Order to reconsider the motion to adopt the proposed ordinance. Motion failed unanimously. Sweeney/Vierling moved to refer the petition to staff and further moved to have staff research the possibility of reopening this issue and to provide the City Council with this information since the City Attorney did not have ample time to respond to Mr. Krass ' s request. Motion carried unanimously. Fred Hoedeman questioned if the Brambilla Motors issue is one of rezoning or one of a conditional use permit. Because this issue was not before the City Council during the public hearing process, no discussion was held. Zak/Vierling moved to direct staff to work with Brambilla Motors on the developer's assistance program already in place to allow Brambilla Motors to consider other alternatives. Motion failed with Cncl Vierling, Sweeney, Wampach and Mayor Laurent voting no and Cncl. Zak voting yes. Mayor Laurent recognized any others in the audience wishing to speak on any issue not on the agenda. There was no response. Sweeney/Wampach moved to approve the consent business as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Wampach moved approval of the meeting minutes from September 3 , 1991. Motion carried unanimously under consent business. Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing on the appeal from the Board of Adjustment and Appeals ' decision on variance requests by Nancy Lee and Patrick Blood. Nancy Lee, applicant, stated she had approached the city for building procedure to build on the property located at 718 West Third Avenue. She stated she received some erroneous information and had to appear before the Board of Adjustments and Appeals seeking four different variances in order to build on this parcel . The Board heard the case September 5, 1991, and approved Variance Resolution No. PC-621 for a 7 , 560 square foot variance from the one acre requirement. She stated this was only one of the four variances needed in order to build, as proposed, and is appealing the Board ' s decision. City Planner stated that reasonable use of the property can be made with the one variance approved by the Board. Mayor Laurent asked for comments from the audience. Florence Greening, 715 West 4th Avenue, stated she did not know the alley in back of her property had been vacated and has been driving Official Proceedings of the October 1, 1991 Shakopee City Council Page -3- over the neighboring parcel for access to her garage. Mrs. Greening stated that if the applicant were to be granted the requested variances, this would place their business very close to her property because of the alley vacation. Patrick Blood, applicant, stated when they had a land survey they did not know that the alley had been abandoned. He added that their proposal would still allow Mrs. Greening access to her garage. Barb Osterkamp, 506 West 3rd Avenue, had concerns with the possibility of increased truck traffic going through a residential area to get to this industrial location. She stated that Rahr Malting changed their truck routes and now the trucks go right past her home; they don't need any additional truck traffic in the area. She also questioned the operating hours for the proposed Lee/Blood recycling business, and if there would be an increase in traffic during the evening hours. She suggested that if the operation is built another access be built so the trucks do not go through the residential area. Dale Greening, 705 West 4th Avenue, stated that this alley should not be considered abandoned. He stated his concern with additional industrial uses in an R-1 area. Doug Greening, 1177 VanBuren, stated his mother can claim the 8 foot alley right-of-way as part of her lot area, which then removes the possibility of reopening the alley in this location. He stated his concern with the excavation activities that would go with the approved variances. He also stated his concern about property values due to the close zoning proximity of industrial and residential uses . Lorraine Beckman, 724 West 4th Avenue, questioned what would happen in the future relative to smell, noise, traffic, and property values if these variances were granted. She questioned why this proposed operation was not being placed in an industrial area further out of town. Melanie Kahleck addressed the inappropriate zoning of industrial adjacent to residential . She stated that it would be best to put the alley back in this area to maintain some type of buffer and that the residents should not have to hire a private attorney to get this accomplished. Hearing no further testimony, Mayor Laurent closed the public hearing. Cncl. Sweeney stated his belief once again that the city should review the zonings and place buffers between industrial and residential uses. Official Proceedings of the October 1, 1991 Shakopee City Council Page -4- Vierling/Zak offered Variance Resolution No. CC-621, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota Denying Four Variances and Sustaining the Board of Adjustment and Appeals Decision to Grant One Variance, and moved for its adoption since this would provide the largest amount of buffer possible between the two zonings. Motion carried with Mayor Laurent, Cncl. Zak and Cncl. Vierling voting yes and Cncl Wampach and Sweeney voting no. The City Council recessed at 9: 10 p.m. Mayor Laurent reconvened the meeting of the City Council at 9 :20 p.m. Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing on the proposed assessments for the Bluff Avenue roadway improvements between Naumkeag and Marschall , Project No. 1990-7 . City Eng. stated the public hearing is to consider adopting the special assessments for the Bluff Avenue Project at a total cost of $158, 494 . 16. City Admn. stated that a letter had been received from Larry Chiat of the Carlson Real Estate Company stating their opposition to the assessments. Mayor Laurent asked for comments from the audience. Hearing no comments, the public hearing was closed. Sweeney/Wampach offered Resolution No. 3475, A Resolution Adopting Assessments for Bluff Avenue, Marschall Road, and Naumkeag Street, Project No. 1990-7 , and moved for its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing on the proposed assessments for the Shumway and Scott Street roadway improvements, Project No. 1991-1. City Eng. stated this public hearing is to consider the special assessments for the Shumway Street/Scott Street Project at a total cost of $151, 375. 93 . Mayor Laurent asked for comments from the audience. Hearing no comments, the public hearing was closed. Wampach/Zak offered Resolution No. 3474 , A Resolution Adopting Assessments for Shumway Street, Third Avenue to Sixth Avenue and Scott Street, Sixth Avenue to Seventh Avenue, Project No. 1991-1, and moved for its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Due to conflict of interest, Mayor Laurent passed the gavel to Vice Mayor Sweeney for discussion of the Eagle Creek Junction 3rd Addition request for appraisal for park dedication fee. Official Proceedings of the October 1, 1991 Shakopee City Council Page -5- Wampach/Vierling moved to authorize obtaining an appraisal on the proposed plat of Eagle Creek Junction, 3rd Addition at a not-to- exceed cost of $800 . Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Laurent absent from the vote. Vice Mayor Sweeney returned the gavel to Mayor Laurent. Sweeney/Vierling moved to authorize the appropriate city officials to prepare plans and specifications for the development of a parking lot behind the City Library. Motion carried with Cncl. Wampach abstaining. Discussion ensured on leasing space from Marquette Bank at their Auto Bank facility. It was the consensus to wait on this issue until we have actually moved. This would give us a chance to measure the real parking impact. Sweeney/Wampach moved to approve the applications and grant an On- Sale Non-intoxicating Malt Liquor License and Wine License to Shakopizza, Inc. , 483 South Marschall Road, effective October 14 , 1991. Motion carried unanimously under consent business. Due to conflict of interest, Mayor Laurent passed the gavel to Vice Mayor Sweeney for discussion of Eagle Creek Junction 3rd Addition public works construction. City Eng. stated the developer of Eagle Creek 3rd Addition has requested the city waive or modify the installation depth requirement for sanitary sewers. He stated staff recommends denial of the request since there are other options available to the developer, and according to the resolution approving the final plat, the developer agrees to construct the streets and sanitary sewers in accordance with the City of Shakopee Standard Specifications. Wampach/Vierling moved to approve the request and direct the appropriate city officials to prepare a resolution amending the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. Motion failed unanimously, with Mayor Laurent absent for the vote. Vice Mayor Sweeney returned the gavel to Mayor Laurent. Sweeney/Wampach moved approval of the bills for $169 , 801. 43 . Motion carried unanimously under consent business. Sweeney/Wampach moved to direct the appropriate city staff to complete the Fifth Avenue/Market Street Project, as scheduled, and to officially go on record as recognizing that the "5-year no street cut policy" may need to be waived on Fifth Avenue between Spencer and Market Streets and on Market Street between Fourth and Seventh Avenues, depending on the final development of this area. Motion carried unanimously under consent business. Official Proceedings of the October 1, 1991 Shakopee City Council Page -6- Sweeney/Vierling moved to authorize the appropriate city officials to execute a contract for the Parking Lot, Bike Trail, Basketball Court, and Utilities Project No. 1991-5 with Bituminous Consulting and Contracting Company, Inc. , in the amount of $53 , 005. 50. Motion carried unanimously. Zak/Vierling moved to authorize the appropriate city officials to utilize the Storm Sewer Fund in the amount of $5, 005. 50 and further allocate an additional $9, 230. 50 from the Park Reserve Fund ($4, 230 . 50 imbalance + $5, 000. 00 contingency) . Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Sweeney moved to reconsider the motion for approval of the 1991 Sidewalk Replacement Program as approved under consent business. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Vierling moved to waive the bidding inconsistency in the bid submitted by Devin Construction of Monticello, Minnesota in the amount of $19 , 348 . 50 for the 1991 Sidewalk Replacement Program. Motion carried unanimously. (The bid was not signed when first submitted to the City, but is signed now) . Vierling/Wampach offered Resolution No. 3473 , A Resolution Accepting Bid on the 1991 Sidewalk Replacement Program, Project No. 1991-7 and moved for its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Wampach moved to authorize the appropriate city staff to increase the contract quantities by 25 percent, or $45, 837 . 12 , if the appropriate waiver forms are obtained from the affected property owners. (1991-7 Sidewalk Replacement Program) Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Wampach offered Resolution No. 3472 , A Resolution Appointing Judges of Election and Establishing Compensation and moved for its adoption. Motion carried unanimously under consent business. Sweeney/Wampach offered Resolution No. 3476, A Resolution Certifying Delinquent Storm Drainage Utility Bills for Collection on the Tax Rolls Payable 1992 , and moved for its adoption. Motion carried unanimously under consent business. Sweeney/Wampach offered Resolution No. 3477 , A Resolution Certifying the Cost of Snow Removal from Public Sidewalks for Collection on the Tax Rolls Payable 1992 , and moved for its adoption. Motion carried unanimously under consent business. Sweeney/Wampach offered Resolution No. 3478 , A Resolution Certifying the Cost of Weed Cutting for Collection on the Tax Rolls Payable 1992 , and moved for its adoption. Motion carried unanimously under consent business. Official Proceedings of the October 1, 1991 Shakopee City Council Page -7- Sweeney/Wampach moved to authorize the hiring of Craig Robson as a patrolman with the Shakopee Police Department at a monthly rate of $2 , 243 . 11 subject to the satisfactory completion of pre-employment medical and psychological testing and the customary 12 month probation period. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Wampach moved to approve the request from the Shakopee Fire Department for approval to immediately develop specifications, in conjunction with a consultant, and to submit specifications for bids and to further authorize the Shakopee Fire Department to proceed with bidding for the replacement of a pumper fire truck. Motion carried unanimously. The City Council recessed for their executive session at 10: 30 p.m. Mayor Laurent re-convened the meeting at 11 : 10 p.m. and stated that no action was taken. Mayor Laurent adjourned to an executive session to receive priority information. Mayor Laurent re-convened the meeting at 11: 15 p.m. and stated that no action was taken. Vierling/Zak moved to adjourn to Tuesday, October 8 , 1991 at 7 : 00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. (The meeting will take place with the Shakopee Public School Board at their meeting place at 505 South Holmes. ) Meeting adjourned at 11: 20 p.m. Jud th S . Cox Cit4 Clerk Jane VanMaldeghem Recording Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 8 , 1991 Mayor Laurent called the joint meeting of the Shakopee City Council and the Shakopee School Board to order at 7:00 p.m. with Cncl. Wampach, Clay, Sweeney, Vierling, and Zak present. Also present: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator; Gregg Voxland, Finance Director; Dave Hutton, City Engineer; Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator; Mark McQuillan, Recreation Program Supervisor. All members of the Shakopee School Board were present. Robert Ostlund, Superintendent of Independent School District No. 720, presented the background on the levy referendum. City Administrator stated that taxes in Scott County will not increase due to the referendum, but may for other reasons. Discussion was held on the possible community center/high school expansion. Mr. Ostlund stated the Shakopee High School is built upon 20 acres, and the state recommends 50 acres for a high school the size of Shakopee's when expanded. Mr. Ostlund presented the School Board Report on this issue stating a majority (78%) of people surveyed favored an expansion for the high school, with 60 percent agreeing that the expansion would need to be supported by the taxpayer. Mayor Laurent stated the recommendation from the task force is to purchase property north of Vierling Drive and appoint a group of people from the Community Recreation Advisory Board to further study the facilities needed for the community. He added that the use of Tax Increment Financing for the project area is still under research by the City. The Finance Director and City Administrator gave an update on the Tax Increment Financing Districts. City Engineer was present to discuss the City's 5-year Capital Improvement Projects. He discussed the three improvement projects that would have the most interest for the School Board: Bloomington Ferry Bridge, Shakopee Bypass, and Downtown Bypass. City Engineer stated that stage one is currently under construction for the Shakopee Bypass with a projected completion date of November 1994 . He added that MnDOT has stated that even with delays, this may not cause the completion date to be changed because the many phases of the project overlap. City Engineer stated the Downtown Bypass is under construction with the bridge and mini-pass to be completed at the same time. The bid letting date has been delayed to April 20, 1992 , and when the bid letting date is delayed, the project can be subject to delay. Official Proceedings of the October 8 , 1991 Shakopee City Council Page -2- City Engineer stated that the Bloomington Ferry Bridge is a county project. The groundbreaking is scheduled for October 15, 1991. This project completion is contingent upon federal funding. School Board Chairman Wendt asked for comments from the City Council members on any of the school strategic planning areas. There was no further discussion. Robert Ostlund stated copies of the community survey results would be made available to the City Council when they are finalized. Robert Ostlund stated that currently 48 percent of the homes in the school district have children either of school age or of pre-school age, which is a high percentage rate. Discussion was held on joint cooperative ventures between the City and School District. Items for consideration were library services and joint facility usage. Discussion was held on future annexation plans. Mayor Laurent stated that Jackson Township is being considered for annexation, but only those areas with sewer availability. The City would like to set up an orderly annexation plan to mutually benefit the Township and the City. He stated that in 1970 several meetings had been held with Jackson Township and many issues resolved. The City Administrator and the Chairman of Jackson Township are investigating these past agreements. Transportation issues were discussed. Ron Ward suggested that subdivisions be developed in a manner that bus transportation can be handled through the development rather than an in/out route. He also addressed cul-de-sacs, which make it difficult for buses to maneuver. Discussion was held on developers providing student bus shelters as a part of the subdivision plat. Sidewalks were discussed. City Engineer stated that a sidewalk policy is being developed and once developed, these policies will be submitted to the School Board for their review. Discussion was held on any plans for stop lights at County Road 17 and 10th Avenue. Ron Ward questioned the possibility of adding school transportation maps to the Developer's Agreement or the platting process. He stated that each time a new subdivision is platted, the school district transportation maps must be updated with their new 1 addresses. Discussion was held. City Administrator stated that addresses are not assigned during the normal platting process. Cncl . Sweeney suggested that the School District could be made aware of new subdivisions and the city be made aware of new School District issues by having the non-originating organization sign off Official Proceedings of the October 8, 1991 Shakopee City Council Page -3- on various documents. He also suggested providing the School District with subdivision maps, if this would help with the bus transportation issue. Sweeney/Vierling moved to adjourn to October 15, 1991, at 7 : 00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. -CJ • lith S. Cox i y Clerk Jane VanMaldeghem Recording Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MN OCTOBER 15, 1991 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 7: 00 p.m. with Cncl. Vierling, Clay, Zak, Wampach and Sweeney present. Also present were Dennis Kraft, City Administrator; Barry Stock, Asst. City Administrator; Karen Marty, City Attorney; Dave Hutton, City Engineer; Lindberg Ekola, City Planner; and Judith Cox, City Clerk. Mayor Laurent read the City Non-Discrimination Policy. The following items were added to the agenda: 14a - Condemnation of city property. 14b - Information on Riva Ridge. Sweeney/Zak moved to approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Liaison reports were given by Councilmembers. Mayor Laurent read the Mayor's report. Mayor Laurent asked if there was anyone from the audience who wished to address anything not on the agenda. There was no response. Item 12D, Comprehensive Sewer Plan, was removed from the consent business. Sweeney/Vierling moved to approve the consent business as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Wampach moved to approve the minutes of September 17, and 24th, 1991. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Vierling offered Ordinance Amendment No. 320, amending City Code Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation (Zoning) , by Repealing Section 11.29, Highway Business (B-1) , Subd. 2, Permitted Uses and Enacting One New Subdivision in Lieu Thereof Relating to the Same Subject, and moved for its adoption. (Motion approved under consent business) . Sweeney/Vierling moved to prepay the assessment for the Shumway Project levied against city owned property parcel number 27-001454- 0 in the amount of $4 , 622 .66 out of the Capital Improvement Fund. (Motion approved under consent business) . Vierling/Clay moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute a contract with Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc. for the purposes of completing a Comprehensive Sewer Plan for a not-to- exceed fee of $110, 000. 00 which includes a $10, 000 contingency. Motion carried unanimously. Official Proceedings of the October 15, 1991 Shakopee City Council Page -2- Sweeney/Vierling moved to approve the application from Roger O. and Eunice M. Dedeker, 610 West 3rd Avenue and grant deferment of special assessments to parcel #27-001310-1 for the 1991-1 Shumway and Scott Streets public improvements, pursuant to the conditions outlined in Section 2 . 82 of the City Code. (Motion approved under consent business) . Sweeney/Vierling offered Resolution No. 3482 , A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota Approving a Premises Permit for the Shakopee Youth Baseball/Softball, and moved for its adoption. (Motion approved under consent business) . Sweeney/Vierling moved to approve the bills in the amount of $612 , 275 . 54 . (Motion approved under consent business) . Sweeney/Vierling moved to amend the 1991 Budget to allow an expenditure of $1, 860 for the purchase of a radar unit and to decrease the amount budgeted for a cellular telephone by a like amount. (Motion approved under consent business) . Sweeney/vierling offered Ordinance No. 321, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending Chapter 9 , Parking Regulations Sec. 9 . 50, Parking During Street Maintenance and Parking Between November 15, and April 1, by Repealing Subd. 8 , Relating to Snow Emergency Routes, and Enacting One New Subdivision in Lieu Thereof, Relating to the Same Subject, and moved for its adoption (9 . 50) . (Motion approved under consent business) . The City Attorney noted that the order for condemnation of property for the Mini Bypass has been revised and that the taking date has been switched back to October 31, 1991, except for two parcels . She said that she will be looking into how this relates to the City ' s renting of parking space. Cncl . Wampach asked about the status of the bonds in regards to Riva Ridge. Mr. Kraft said he would look into it further and come back with information. Mayor Laurent recessed the meeting at 7 :25 p.m. Mayor Laurent reconvened the meeting at 7 : 30 p.m. Mayor Laurent opened the public hearing on the vacation of cartways (Breeggemann, Mielke, and Petsch) . Dave Hutton reviewed the proposed vacation of three cartways. He said it was one of the ways for the city to save money on road maintenance. He showed a short video of the three roads involved. Official Proceedings of the October 15, 1991 Shakopee City Council Page -3- MIELKE CARTWAY: He said current maintenance consists of grading 2-3 times per year and after a snow fall. He said there are two homes off of this driveway, one is the Stemmer property the other is the Meilke property. The Mielke property was recently purchased by the Sioux Community. Martin Theis, owner of two of the surrounding parcels, stated that he would be willing to dedicate 60 feet to the city. John Clifford, from the Dorsey, Whitney Law Firm representing the Sioux Community, said this is the only road to the Mielke property and they would like to keep this road the way it currently is. Mrs. Goldberg, said she would rather have the City abandon the road, because she does not need it, she has access to CR-42 . She does not want to be assessed for it. Jeanette Stemmer, said if the road is vacated they will definitely be landlocked as that is the only road out of their property. They want the city to keep maintaining it. Rick Carlson, Eden Prairie, he owns the property to the east of the Theis property and currently has a private easement through the Theis property to this road. His land would be landlocked if this piece is vacated. Harry Weinandt, 1215 16th Circle, last Chairman of the Eagle Creek Township, said he remembers that_ it was a township road and believes that if it was still Eagle Creek Township, that they would still be maintaining it. Mayor Laurent recessed the public hearing. Cncl. Vierling said she thinks it is premature to do any kind of improvement to the roadway until the issue of the easements has been settled. Clay/Vierling moved that City Council continue maintenance of the Mielke roadway as discussed contingent upon the City and the property owners involved coming to an agreement and granting the City an easement for the roadway by March 31, 1992, if at that time it is not done, the roadway will be vacated. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent reconvened the public hearing at 8 : 15 p.m. Official Proceedings of the October 15, 1991 Shakopee City Council Page -4- BREEGGEMANN CARTWAY: Dave Hutton said this roadway is not really fit for any type of vehicles except farm equipment. There has not been any maintenance done since 1983 . The cost saving of vacating this roadway would be none. It is basically a field access road. Monique Brambilla, suggested putting a sign up indicating that the roadway is a private road. Tom Phillips, owner of property to the west of Hauer property said he would be landlocked if this road were vacated. It is the only way he can get to his property. Dave Hutton stated that it is questionable as to whether the 33 ' easement goes beyond the abandoned railroad to the Phillip property. Mayor Laurent recessed the public hearing. Sweeney/Vierling moved that the City continue to do nothing in regards to the maintenance of the Breeggemann road and that it be posted with a "road closed" sign. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Laurent reconvened the public hearing at 8 : 34 p.m. PETSCH CARTWAY: Dave Hutton said the majority of the driveway maintenance consists of snow plowing depending on the winter. He said that Mr. Petsch has an easement over the dirveway and if the City vacated it, the easement would continue to provide him access. The home is currently vacant. He is recommending to vacate this driveway. The cost saving to the city would be approximately $1, 000 . 00 Clarence Petsch said he would like the city to keep maintaining the two rod road, that it is rental property and will probably be rented this fall . Mr. Petsch stated he has a water drainage problem along the roadway. There being no further comments, the Mayor closed the public hearing. Sweeney/Clay offered Resolution No. 3481, A Resolution Vacating That Part of a Cartway, Commonly Referred to as the Petsch' s Driveway Located East of McKenna Road, Along a Line Between Sections 15 and 22 , Range 22 , Township 115, Scott County, Minnesota, and moved for its adoption. Motion carried with Cncl . Wampach opposed. Mayor Laurent called a recess at 8 : 55 p.m. Mayor Laurent reconvened the City Council at 9 : 05 p.m. Official Proceedings of the October 15, 1991 Shakopee City Council Page -5- Sweeney/Vierling moved to rescind the action of September 17, 1991, which defeated Ordinance No. 319, which ordinance added conditional uses to the I-2 zone. Motion carried with Mayor Laurent opposed. Sweeney/Vierling offered Ordinance No. 319, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota Amending Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation (Zoning) , Section 11.32, Light Industry (I-1) , and Section 11.33, Heavy Industrial (I-2) , By Adding One New Paragraph to Subd. 3, Conditional Uses, in Each Section, Relating to Retail Sales, as presented on 9-17-91, and moved its adoption. Mayor Laurent read the letter from FMG/Tsumura opposing the relocation of Brambilla Motor Homes. John Leroux, 2542 Hauer Trail, Shakopee, said that in 1986 open sales lots were left out of the new (RTD) zone based on the recommendations by the consultant. He feels, however, that open sales lots will not effect the industrial park. Mayor Laurent read a letter from Jon Albinson clarifying the position of Valley Green Business Park as it relates to the proposed ordinance. Cncl. Zak said he will vote against the rezoning only because it is a zoning issue and has nothing to do with Mr. Brambilla or his business. Mr. Brambilla spoke, saying that he has tried everything possible to stay in the City of Shakopee. He said his operation is exactly the same as the auto auction, but smaller. Jim Hidding, owner of the property in question, said that this property is doing nothing for the City right now, but if Mr. Brambilla built on it that it would increase tax revenue for the City. He said he would like to see the City support this because in the long run it will benefit the City. Sweeney/Vierling offered Ordinance No. 319, An Ordinance to add conditional uses in the I-2 zone, as presented by the City Attorney. Motion fails with Cncl. Zak and Mayor Laurent opposed. Barry Stock reviewed the early retirement proposal for eligible city employees. He said the Building Inspector has expressed an interest in taking advantage of this offer if it could be extended to February 28, 1992 . It would mean additional dollars per month from PERA for him if he could work until then. Clay/Sweeney moved to amend the Resolution 3483 to allow for an early retirement window between now and February 28, 1992 . Motion carried with Sweeney opposed. Official Proceedings of the October 15, 1991 Shakopee City Council Page -6- Sweeney/Clay offered Resolution No. 3483 , A Resolution of the City of Shakopee Adopting an Early Retirement Policy, and moved its adoption. Cncl . Sweeney said he had some serious questions and concerns about the proposal. He said he would like to see it looked into further so as to provide better savings for the city. Sweeney/Vierling moved to table Resolution No. 3483 until further information is received from staff. Motion carried with Cncl . Clay opposed. Mayor Laurent djourned the meeting at 10 : 45 p.m. S&d ' th ox, 7-- Cit Clerk Carol L. Schultz, Recording Secretary Io. a . Ladbroke .miplrawwi jig Canterbury Downs November 4, 1991 The Honorable Gary Laurent and Shakopee City Council Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mayor Laurent and Members of the City Council : The following summarizes certain issues affecting Canterbury Downs and proposes that certain actions be taken by you on behalf of Canterbury Downs in regard to the assessed valuation of the racetrack property for purposes of levying taxes . In this respect, we are requesting that a committee of the whole meeting be scheduled in the near future to discuss these matters further . Background Since opening its doors in 1985, Canterbury Downs has played a major role in the Shakopee community. We feel, and we hope that you agree, that the racetrack has benefitted our community in many ways, such as: * creating a large number of jobs for local citizens; * introducing thousands of tourists to the area; * financing many major improvements in the City through the payment of over $15 million in real estate taxes since 1985 making Canterbury Downs the largest tax payer in the City. When the racetrack was proposed and built in 1985, the owners and the community were very optimistic about its future. As the first and only form of legal wagering available in the state, the attendance projections were phenomenal . On this basis, the owners felt a large facility of the highest quality was appropriate and thus spent approximately $80 million on the facility. At the same time, the City of Shakopee made certain improvements to facilitate the construction, including sewer, water, road improvements and land write down. These improvements were financed by the City through tax increment bond issues including a $4 . 2 million issue which directly benefitted the track. Related to this, the racetrack entered into an assessment agreement with the City. This agreement was viewed as a sign of good faith by the racetrack to the City and set a minimum valuation of $43 .25 million on the racetrack property for purposes of assessing real estate Ladbroke at Canterbury Downs 1100 Canterbury Road, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone (612) 445-7223 FAX (612) 496-7741 LYA Ladbroke Group Company Page Two November 4 , 1991 taxes . This value was set somewhat arbitrarily as no one would have dreamed what the future was to hold for the racetrack. The assessment agreement fixes the minimum value at $43 . 25 million through 1994 . Declines in attendance and related revenues since 1985 resulted in large losses and ultimately bankruptcy for the original owners of the racetrack. In 1990, Ladbroke Racing Corporation, along with our partners Messrs . Hartman and Tyner purchased the racetrack for approximately $21 million dollars . Although this was a fraction of its original cost, it was a considerable amount of money. Based on generally accepted accounting principles, the purchase price was allocated approximately $16 million to the real estate and $5 million to the other assets acquired such as furniture, fixtures and equipment . Additionally, an MAI certified appraisal done at the date of acquisition, set the real estate value at $19 million (see Exhibit I) . Were it not for the existence of the assessment agreement, the property value would be set by the County Assessor ' s office in the same fashion as other businesses . The $43 , 250 , 000 valuation under the assessment agreement resulted in 1991 real estate taxes of $2,476 , 584 for the racetrack. To put this into perspective, these taxes are more than double the total amounts paid to the state for parimutuel taxes and are the third largest expense of the racetrack behind salaries and purses (see Exhibit II) . Additionally, based on figures supplied by the City, Canterbury Downs is the single largest taxpayer in the City and pays more than double the taxes of the next largest taxpayer (see Exhibit III) . As you are aware, the downward trend in attendance and related revenues has continued, and even accelerated, since our acquisition of the racetrack. While we were able to make a small profit in 1990, this trend will result in significant losses for 1991 . Our current projections show we will lose approximately $4 million in 1991 and additional amounts in 1992 and beyond. These declines and resultant losses are the direct result of the increased competition for the wagering dollar brought on by the introduction in the past few years of charitable gambling, state lottery, dog racing and most recently, Indian casino gambling . Our ability to continue to operate the racetrack will be greatly impacted by the future level of taxation. Page Three November 4 , 1991 Proposal Based on all of the above information, we are proposing to the City that the assessment agreement be terminated and Canterbury Downs ' property be valued at market by the County Assessor for 1992 and beyond. This is three years sooner than this would happen under the current terms of the agreement . We have reviewed with the City Finance Director the potential effect this will have on the City' s finances . Due to the high level of taxes paid by Canterbury Downs over the past seven years , a large surplus has been built up by the City. Therefore, even with the significant reduction in the racetrack' s real estate taxes , there would be no need for additional tax assessments from other sources to meet the City' s current obligations . We understand that from a purely legal standpoint, it appears that the City of Shakopee has every right to hold Canterbury Downs to the assessment agreement; therefore we are appealing to you on the basis of fairness . We hope you feel it is in the City' s best interest to help us compete in a market which is changing rapidly and we are hereby asking for your help in this regard. Sincerely, ichard A. Reichow Chief Financial Officer 4341L : khs p O- NO O W p O 1 N v w n < N0. V a ° 1;1i cn m - y Z mm O -1 o 0 '0 rn 33 O� � OC \ \ 73 M 33 < 1v 0 < * a .IL \ ry D CD C v , -4a c � - 0 OCA rnv O Z -1 O 13O > \ \ n x 4 _, N W 01 O O O O Oo p O O Oo Oo O \ 0 05 WAGES & BENEFITS m \ a co y o. \\\\ Si O PURSES 0 Z -II 33 CONTRACT O W SERVICES C M 23 STATE a � TAXES "I 0 9 mIC MARKETING in M CD Z 23 RENT C) m mi INS 33 0 UTLTY til X Z OTHERtt _L _L N N 0 0 0 0 00 0 II I I q ' : .. :ns. :• v ::}i:•::r.�:C: ..} x}i::•{.v .$4 : : v ix d i •k,#; +{Yy.,ti.:*.k%:. :i•ri. . ,,.§, n4,:,. .'CD d) o aa 0 o co c 0 NSP 3 6 CD CA Y CO 1 C K-MART 1 \ RAHR` \ 0 1 —1 1\ ° O r r M i1.1111 D_ 11 Wom 33D Ti zZ mm 7.1 X m o �D NO u,O Nxi m o0 m Z • X r z ' N m 0 r m tll z XM W H C) eCJ 33 M--I m y m X N H N / S CO MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Application for Massage Center License DATE: November 1, 1991 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Application has been made by Tracy and Timothy Hoenstein, 1415 Shakopee Avenue, for a massage center license. They plan on offering therapeutic massage as a service at their place of business, Today' s Concept, 491 Marschall Road. Kristy Mahoney will be providing the therapeutic massages. She has applied for a masseuse license which is being processed. The police department was provided the appropriate information for the background investigation on all personnel employed by Today' s Concept. They have conducted the appropriate investigations on all employees. They have also conducted an investigation on Kristy who is not an employee, but is renting space to conduct massage therapy. Chief Steininger has advised me that everyone has passed the investigation. The building inspector has inspected the premises for compliance with Ordinance No. 310, which requires compliance with building and plumbing regulations. The premises are in conpliance with the requirements for providing therapeutic massage. Ordinance No. 310 also requires public liability insurance to be carried by the licensee. The applicant will be filing a certificate of insurance with the city prior to November 6th. Assuming that the appropriate certificate of insurance is filed and assuming it meets city requirements, the application for a massage center license will be in order. An updated memo will be placed on the council table for the November 6th meeting. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve application and grant a license 2 . Deny a license 3 . Table the application for additional information 4 . Approve application and grant a license conditioned upon filing an appropriate certificate of insurance RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends alternative No. 1 if the insurance is in order by November 6th, and alternative No. 4 if the insurance is not in order by November 6th. City of Shakopee t POLICE DEPARTMENT "-vi'ak- a 47-_,:p.,1( 476 South Gorman Street , ` •� '• I IC% SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 N , :T rdit Tel. 612/445-6666 f y► , ' I -' Fax. 612/445-2313 AKO 47/7iv 4„,E OP/, � ' �f . / i October 28 , 1991 TO: JUDY COX, CITY CLERK FROM: TOM STEININGER, CHIEF OF POLICE SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR MASSEUSE LICENSE APPLICANT: TRACY AND TIMOTHY HOHENSTEIN After completing the required background checks and investigations on the applicants and the listed employees, the Shakopee Police Department can find no cause to deny issuance of a masseuse license to the above named applicants doing business as Today's Concept. __Y1 X 11 ,i' ,,. +e7/ CL Signed Date go cSctve ao a.otcct UPDATE icc) MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft , City Administrator FROM: Judith S . Cox, City Clerk RE: Application for Massage Center License DATe : November 6 , 1991 The application is in order, except for the certificate of insurance . Please approve the license subject to the filing of an acceptable certificate of insurance. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the application and grant a massage center license to Tracy and Timothy Hoenstein, Today' s Concept, 491 Marschall Road, conditioned upon filing an acceptable certificate of insurance . /310 MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Property Negotiations - Moratorium Area DATE: October 30, 1991 INTRODUCTION: On October 29, 1991 the Committee of the Whole moved to recommend to City Council that the appropriate City officials be directed to begin negotiations for the acquisition of property within the moratorium area. If City Council concurs with the recommendation of the Committee of the Whole, it would be appropriate to direct the appropriate City officials to proceed accordingly. BACKGROUND: In order for staff to effectively participate in the negotiation process for the acquisition of property located within the moratorium area, it would be beneficial to have an appraisal ordered for the property in question. If Council wishes to proceed with ordering an appraisal, funding will have to be allocated from the contingency fund. At the present time, there is $36, 000 remaining in the contingency appropriation. The appraisal in question will be for the 78 acres identified within the moratorium area. Cost estimates for an appraisal range between $1, 000 and $2 , 000. In addition to the Committee of the Whole's recommendation requesting that the appropriate City officials begin negotiations, staff would also like to recommend that the appropriate City officials be authorized to order an appraisal of the 78 acres identified within the moratorium area at a cost not to exceed $2 , 000 with funding to be allocated from the contingency appropriation account for said appraisal. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Move to direct the appropriate City officials to begin negotiations for the acquisition of the property within the moratorium area and authorize the appropriate City officials to obtain an appraisal of the 78 acres identified within the moratorium area at a cost not to exceed $2 , 000 with funding to be allocated from the contingency appropriation account for said appraisal. 2 . Move to authorize the appropriate City officials to begin negotiations for the acquisition of the property within the moratorium area. 3 . Do nothing. 4 . Table action pending further information from staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to authorize the appropriate City officials to begin negotiations for the acquisition of the property within the moratorium area and authorize the appropriate City officials to obtain an appraisal of the 78 acres identified within the moratorium area at a cost not to exceed $2 , 000 with funding to be allocated from the contingency appropriation account for said appraisal. MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Creation of a Municipal Facility Needs Assessment Committee DATE: October 30, 1991 INTRODUCTION: At the Committee of the Whole meeting held on October 29 , 1991 discussion ensued on the possibility of creating a committee to investigate survey method alternatives to determine community facility needs and respondents willingness to pay. The Committee of the Whole moved to recommend to City Council that such a committee be created. BACKGROUND: There are several options for City Council to consider in terms of the establishment of a committee to investigate survey method alternatives to determine community facility needs and respondents willingness to pay. First, the City Council could select to have the Mayor appoint a committee to complete the task as outlined. Second, City Council could select to have each City Council person submit the names of two or more persons to serve on the committee. A third option would be to advertise in the newspaper for interested persons and appoint anyone who expresses interest in serving on the committee. Staffs preference would be to have a committee created that is limited to no more than 10 persons. Based on past experience with special committees that have been created, staff has found that the law of diminishing returns goes into effect when the size of a committee goes beyond ten persons. The last municipal facility committee was appointed by the Mayor. In keeping with past practice, staff would recommend that the same course of action be followed with the proposed committee. ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Request that the Mayor appoint a committee to investigate survey method alternatives to determine community facility needs and respondents willingness to pay. 2 . Have each City Councilmember submit two names to the Mayor for appointment to a Municipal Facility Needs Assessment Committee. 3 . Place an ad in the Shakopee Valley News soliciting residents interested in serving on a Municipal Facility Needs Assessment Committee. 4 . Select some other method to appoint a Municipal Facility Needs Assessment Committee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1. ACTION REQUESTED: Request that the Mayor appoint a committee to investigate survey method alternatives to determine community facility needs and respondents willingness to pay. CONSENT /3c) MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Municipal Facility Funding Options DATE: October 30, 1991 INTRODUCTION: On October 29, 1991 the City Council met in the Committee of the Whole to discuss the findings of the Municipal Facility Task Force. Upon discussing several issues presented by the Municipal Facility Subcommittee, the Committee of the Whole moved to recommend to City Council that the appropriate officials be directed to evaluate the different funding options available for land acquisition and/or facility development. BACKGROUND: Since the actions of the Committee of the Whole are advisory in nature, if the City Council wishes to have staff evaluate alternative funding options available for land acquisition and/or facility development, it would be appropriate at this time to direct the appropriate City officials accordingly. Staff believes that a detailed evaluation of the alternative funding options and the accompanying pros and cons of each option can be completed by the November 19, 1991 meeting. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Move to direct the appropriate City officials to evaluate the different funding options available for land acquisition and/or facility development and report back their findings at the November 19, 1991 meeting. 2 . Do nothing. 3 . Table action pending further information from staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to direct the appropriate City officials to evaluate the different funding options available for land acquisition and/or facility development and report back their findings at the November 19, 1991 meeting. 0 f2) MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Early Retirement Policy - Resolution No. 3483 DATE: October 24 , 1991 INTRODUCTION: On October 15, 1991, Shakopee City Council discussed the proposed Early Retirement Policy. At that time City Council amended the Resolution No. 3483 extending the retirement date to February 28, 1992 . The resolution was subsequently tabled pending further information from Staff. BACKGROUND: Attached is Resolution No. 3483 , A Resolution of the City of Shakopee Adopting an Early Retirement Policy as amended by City Council at the October 15, 1992 meeting. Staff has met with each of the eligible employees to determine potential interest. Shown in Exhibit A is a summary of the approximate retirement figures for the employees who have expressed possible interest. Exhibits B - D analyze the cost impact of the Early Retirement Incentive Program as it relates to each position on the 1992 through 1994 budgets. At the October 15, 1991 meeting, several questions were raised in regard to the Early Retirement Policy. First, Council questioned whether or not the severance costs for the employees (vacation and sick leave) were budgeted somewhere in the overall City budget. The answer to this question is Yes. (Except for unused vacation and sick leave accrued in 1991. ) Compensated absences which include accumulated sick leave and vacation time are accounted for as a liability on the City' s balance sheet. (See Exhibit E) If an employee discontinues service with the City of Shakopee, his/her accumulated severance is deducted from cash and investments. However, the retirement incentive proposed in the Early Retirement Policy is not accounted for within the current City budget. Therefore, on the analysis sheets as they pertain to each individual, the cost for the retirement incentive has been shown as an expense in 1992 . Since one of the employees interested in the Early Retirement Policy expressed possible interest in extending employment to February 29 , 1992 , the question arose as to whether or not employees could be on the City' s payroll but no longer working. In other words, if an employee took an unpaid leave of absence, would the time off be eligible for PERA time worked credit? The answer to this question is No. According to representatives from the PERA office, time credited for PERA retirement purposes must be paid. If the retirement prospect wished to utilize accumulated vacation between January 1 , 1992 and February 29 , 1992 , PERA credit would be accrued. However, this option is mute since the prospect in question does not have the potential for 8 weeks of vacation accrual. It should also be noted that the prospects severance benefit would be significantly reduced if this option were pursued. The third question raised by City Council was in regard to the cost savings of the policy if the plan is not utilized until February 28, 1992 . Note that I have included on each analysis the reduction in savings if the plan is extended until February 28, 1992. Staff supports amending the resolution changing the retirement date back to December 31, 1991 as originally proposed. Any variance from the provisions as set forth in the policy in terms of the proposed retirement date of December 31, 1991 adversely impacts the amount of cost savings associated with the program. Staff believes that the originally proposed policy is fair to all employees and provides employees nearing retirement with extra retirement benefits while at the same time allowing long term cots savings for the City. If Council wishes to consider a later retirement date than what is proposed in the policy, staff would simply recommend that the early retirement incentive concept be approved at this time and revisited again next August with a proposed retirement date of September 30, 1992 . Adoption of a early retirement policy at that time would provide greater cost savings within the police department because a replacement officer would not have to be hired until May 1st of the following year. (Staff understands that the Council structure may change and approval of any retirement policy in 1992 would be determined by the Council seated at that time. ) ALTERNATIVES: 1A. Move to amend Resolution No. 3483 changing the retirement date from February 28, 1992 to December 31, 1991. 1B. Offer Resolution No. 3483 as amended, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee Adopting an Early Retirement Policy for the City of Shakopee. 2 . Offer Resolution No. 3483 , A Resolution of the City of Shakopee Adopting an Early Retirement Policy for the City of Shakopee, and move its adoption. 3 . Do not adopt an Early Retirement Policy for the City of Shakopee in 1991. 4 . Table action pending further information from staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: 1A. Move to amend Resolution No. 3483 changing the retirement date from February 28, 1992 to December 31, 1991. 1B. Offer Resolution No. 3483 as amended, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee Adopting an Early Retirement Policy for the City of Shakopee, and move its adoption. BAS/tiv TAMI\ADMIN\RETIREMT CD 0 C > d 00 Cl)) 9 � a 40 � 90Z b < et X Cl) XiC C x r' to ;u ch :n x r, w b ro CD CD 01 Cl) C) CA CA m t=] 0 t) V) C) CA VIt'iOt'' :ti 11 •- t11 N C17 C17 N i-C H tx1 N t'i :n 1-C H O 0 P) Z V] 7:( V] Z CI) � C/) ril H PJ i Z O. 0 4- CO Co V cU'n Z H D) .. - - _ - - - - CD fn tri U) I--' 1--' VD N N � F. CO C17 til N Co N 4> w 4> 4 9 U) w 0 w F. F-' 'D 01 � Z H O. 0 CO N CO N 4> KJ gN w I--' O O 1/40 V N H H - - - - - H CD N � F-' Unca VD I. lo• ca=l OO. F�-' 1' CV. VDw4l-C U) O. 4 V 0 0 Ln a. N Cl N co co co LA F-‘ V ',O Cl n N) w I-' w w w In In C w 4> 4- O. Cn CA a V) A w N) co '.O '.O CIF O ' ',D Cl .O VI N 4 V w C' Cn 1-IJ Fi - V O. ON 0 N 4- C) < '0 .O 0 F-' I--' I-. N) 0 O Cn w Cn 0 0 V Co I-' 9 Cl '.0 N N 4> 4' 10 N) PV I-, V F. '.0 O O 0 .O *VI H gw V V .> N 01/4 0 CA PO Cn O. a\ co co co O co 0rt. Z c'') O O O Cn co cru co Cl 0-A C11 H I-I N w w w V CO 'O ("PO 0 VO N I-' VD V F. Cl) 9 w Ca w VI 4- Ln Ln 0 Z . CD V N N 10 I-• Cn O. H i-< N Cr. co F-' co 0 N Cr) V 4> lO 0. 0 I-' O 00 C) 10 V 0. w V In lO Z CI CO CO O O 1/40 N) tO 1/40 4> N) I- I- Cn V CA O '.0 4> w 0 0 In (.n CO 4 N N O. 4> V 0, H ht Z -CA -CA -CA-CA -CA -CA C) CDD 0 '.0 l~n N CONFw -' F--'La Z N - - - - - - - H -J H 11 Ln w VI (.4P-.1 4> 00 w P. co CP Cn Cn C" H Cn N w O. V I--' 4 0 H V N 10 1/40 w 00 I-' C I-'• In N 0. O. 0 CO F- w• r9"' w CO N) CO w CO Cl ft co O .0 co vi co w 4, N 6. N) ON w 00 0 b VI D" 0 4 O. %D CO 0 10 V Ln Ln 00 w w 01 9 :)S 0 .. 4> 4> CA CA rn v r x 0 Z N Co CO 0 -J 0 CO .. I-I O a, co 4 4> rn o W rt H O VI CO N) In I-, w I- y Fi (D 1/40 1/40 I-' N 0 CP C./) rt r a• 0' F'• 4, co a\ V V I-' F'• >I 0 Oq V Ln co Ln '.0 .0 to Ft '0 F-' Cn CO 4> t�C C) a I--' 'O F-, V w a. w• (,) U) co "h" fT CO N N I- a1 Cn Cl) U) I-4 (7Q 0 FF-+ h CC// LA a. 4> CC000 0 CD II ‘4 C [TJ La h) NN 0 U) F.I. rl N w 0. .O •"'I. Z IN) 0 4•• a` N CA o N' n - 2 0. .0 .O N � 1 0 N V N V I-' CD La ON F. CD 1/40 a k.0 C7 0 CCOO w v) CD fD I--' > - F-, U) Cl) Fy+ 1.-1.--‘V O O N C 0 w P-' CnN vo al 2 W ra CO 4>N Q) •wcn 0 y V O F-' N W. I-I VO 10 W a• 0 en 01/4 Ln V CD 11 0 F-, N CAA fD td O D) I ' N 1--' COOD N h-' fD9 VI V w .P- VD'0 IZ V .O a. F. F. HI C7 w 01 F-' 0 Cz! 0 V N CA O H C/) O F•-' r ON 9 ON' NIN'' C) VD Cn w ,C r• ~ I"' 0 w F-' V) c7,C 0 � ~O -a> in•cn - 4 <n h.{n 4.n V> r r' O 0. O 4> CO V Ln N H T� Cl) O U0Lofr. 'Drnco9 f D N w I-, 0 1/40 V N r-' N 10 I--' U' '.0 P -' 1/40 :G E I-I a. 4 V 0 In 01 N DI Q4 fD EXHIBIT B EARLY RETIREMENT BUDGET ANALYSIS Deputy Police Chief 1992 1993 1994 Asst. Police Chief budgeted wages & benefits $52, 819 . 16 $52 , 819 . 16 $52 , 819 . 16 Less Retirement Incentive (15, 892 .92) --- --- Less Cost of Replacement 1. (patrolman-entry level) (21, 474 . 64) (33 , 822 . 56) (37,204.81) 2 . Less Cost of Deputy Chief ( 5, 056. 05) ( 5, 056. 05) ( 5, 056. 05) Replacement Actual Budget Savings $10, 395. 55 $13 , 940. 55 $10, 558 . 30 1 . 5/1/92 Start 2 . 1/1/92 Start 3 . Wage and benefit calculations do not include sick leave/vacation benefit differentials. 4 . The amounts depicted will increase or decrease dependent upon when and if certain positions are filled. 5. Calculations do not include COLA adjustments Impact of changing retirement date to 2/29/92 * 1992 Budget savings illustrated above would be reduced by approximately $8,000 . 00. EXHIBIT C EARLY RETIREMENT BUDGET ANALYSIS Building Official 1992 1993 1994 Building Official budgeted wages & benefits $51, 176. 63 $51, 176. 63 $51, 176. 63 Less Retirement Package Cost ( 8 , 210. 50) --- --- Less Replacement Building 1. 2 . 3 . Official Wage & Benefits (43 , 498 . 84) (46, 057 . 39) (48 , 615. 93) Plus Budgeted Unemployment Exp. $ 6, 500. 00 --- --- Actual Budget Savings $ 5, 967 . 29 $ 5, 119 . 24 $ 2 , 560. 70 1 . Step 3 - Bldg. Official 2 . Step 4 - Bldg. Official 3 . Step 5 - Bldg. Official 4 . Wage and benefit calculations do not include sick leave/vacation benefit differentials. 5. The amounts depicted will increase or decrease dependent upon when and if certain positions are filled. 6. Calculations do not include COLA adjustments Impact of changing retirement date to 2/29/92 * 1992 Budget savings illustrated above would be reduced by approximately $3,400 . 00. EXHIBIT D EARLY RETIREMENT BUDGET ANALYSIS Sergeant 1992 1993 1994 Sergeant budgeted wages & benefits $50, 418. 16 $50, 418 . 16 $50, 418 . 16 Less Retirement Incentive (15, 167 . 16) --- --- Less Cost of Replacement 1. (patrolman-entry level) (32 , 211. 96) (33 , 822 . 56) (37,204.81) 2 . Less Cost of Sergeant ( 2 , 400. 00) ( 4 , 056. 00) ( 4 , 056 . 00) Replacement Actual Budget Savings $ 639 . 04 $12 , 539 . 60 $ 9 , 157 . 35 1. 1/1/92 Start 2 . 1/1/92 Start 3 . Wage and benefit calculations do not include sick leave/vacation benefit differentials. 4 . The amounts depicted will increase or decrease dependent upon when and if certain positions are filled. 5 . Calculations do not include COLA adjustments Impact of changing retirement date to 2/29/92 . * 1992 Budget saving illustrated above would only be reduced by approximately $100. 00. The actual savings in this analysis is basically the difference in cost between an entry level patrolman and a top sergeant position. 1- EXHIBIT E CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DECEMBER 31, 1990 1990 1989 ASSETS Cash and Investments $1,345,895 $1.117.350 Accrued Interest Receivable 5,583 17,990 Accounts Receivable 29,401 52,061 11 Taxes Receivable - Delinquent 122,448 102,125 Due From Other Funds 280,762 957,013 Due From Other Governments 95,858 51,044 Total Assets $1,879,947 $2,297,583 I- Liabilities And Fund Balance Liabilities i Salaries Payable $ $ 39,143 Accounts Payable 119,427 122,962 Compensated Absences 252.207 225.071 i Due To Other Funds 17,457 6,542 Due To Other Governments 28,711 32,857 Due To Other Governments - Long Term 23,600 Deferred Revenue 122,448 102,125 Total Liabilities 540,250 552,300 , Fund Balance Designated For Subsequent Years Budget 214,591 Unreserved 1,339,697 1,530,692 Total Fund Balance 1,339,697 1,745,283 i Total Liabilities And Fund Balance $1,879,947 $2,297,583 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. /- • t F � 32 I RESOLUTION NO. 3483 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ADOPTING AN EARLY RETIREMENT POLICY. WHEREAS, the City is in the process of budgeting for the upcoming fiscal year, and has learned it may face a reduction in work force; and WHEREAS, the City has been approached by employees who are interested in taking early retirement; and WHEREAS, before the budget is finalized, the City would like to allow employees desiring to take early retirement an option to do so; and WHEREAS, the City has a small number of employees, and therefore would be crippled if a large number of employees in any given department took early retirement. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS : That the an Early Retirement Policy is hereby adopted, which shall provide as follows: EARLY RETIREMENT. City employees may elect early retirement, subject to the provisions set forth below. An employee is eligible for early retirement if (a) the employee has worked for the City of Shakopee for at least 15 years; (b) the employee is eligible for a full or reduced pension upon retirement; and (c) the employee shall be at least 55 years old on or before December 31, 1991, unless the employee is a police officer, in which the minimum age shall be 50. Such a retiring employee would receive a lump sum payment covering the following items: 1. All accumulated unused vacation time. 2 . Up to one-third of accumulated unused sick leave, up to a maximum of 960 hours. (Police officers 45% of 960 hours. ) 3 . A percentage of the salary times years of service based on the following formula: 1% for each of the first 15 years of service, plus an additional 0. 2% for each year thereafter, up to a maximum rate of 3%. These payments for vacation, sick leave, and years of service would all be calculated on the basis of the employee ' s 1991 base salary or wage scale (excluding overtime) . These benefits would be in lieu of any benefits described in any existing personnel policy or contract. This early retirement package must be requested, in writing to the City Administrator, by an interested employee on or before 4 : 30 p.m. , November 29 , 1991, with the employee retiring by December 31, 1991 February 28 , 1992 . A partial or conditional acceptance will not be considered. Any employee taking early retirement shall be required to sign appropriate documents prepared by the City Attorney. A maximum of two employees per department may take early retirement. If more than two employees in the same department request it, they shall be selected on the basis of the following: the most highly placed (with department head being the highest position) employees shall have priority over lower employees. If two employees are in the same job position, the employee with the most months of service with the City shall have priority over the employee with fewer months. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1991. Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney [EARLYRET] 2 LiJ� bu \ V MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Scott County Economic Development Coalition Joint Powers Agreement Amendments DATE: October 23, 1991 INTRODUCTION: Several Attorney's representing various jurisdictions serving on the Scott County Economic Development Coalition have raised some concerns regarding the Scott County Economic Development Coalition Joint Powers Agreement. The past two months, the Attorney's involved have been reviewing the Joint Powers Agreement as presently adopted and are recommending that several amendments be made at this time. BACKGROUND: On May 5, 1991, the Shakopee City Council authorized the appropriate City officials to execute the Scott County Economic Development Coalition Joint Powers Agreement. The Joint Powers Agreement was subsequently amended on July 16, 1991. The Attorney's representing various jurisdictions serving on the Scott County Economic Development Coalition are recommending that several additional amendments be made to clarify several sections of the Joint Powers Agreement. Attached is a copy of the Joint Powers Agreement. The amendments proposed by the Attorney's have been typed in bold face and underlined. Previous amendments approved by the Scott County Economic Development Coalition Board of Directors and the participating jurisdictions have also been included and are underlined. Language that is being proposed for deletion at this time has a line through it. The proposed amendments would provide clarification in the following areas: 1. Board of Director representation - The proposed change to Section 5 of the Joint Powers Agreement would not allow representation from financial institutions or development institutions to serve on the Board of Directors. State Statute does not allow non governmental representatives to serve on a Joint Powers Board. The representatives from financial and/or development institutions have been informed of the proposed change and do not object. 2 . Twin Cities Metro Development Company - The proposed amendment to Section 6 of the Agreement provides the Coalition with the authority to contract with an organization to process and facilitate the approval of SBA guarantee loans. The previous language specifically mentioned the Twin Cities Metro Development Company and did not allow the authority to contract with such an organization. 3. Contracts With Participating Bodies - The proposed amendment provides the Coalition with the authority to contract with individual participating bodies for services as deemed appropriate by the Board of Directors. 4 . Termination - Section 14 is being changed to clearly identify the course of action to be followed in the event that the Joint Powers Agreement is terminated. Several other changes are also being proposed which are relatively minor in nature and do not warrant detailed explanation. The Bylaws which normally appear as Exhibit A to the Joint Powers Agreement have been intentionally not included in this packet since no changes are being proposed in the Bylaws at this time. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the appropriate city officials to execute the proposed amendments to the Scott County Economic Development Coalition Joint Powers Agreement. 2. Do not approve the amendments to the Scott County Economic Development Coalition Joint Powers Agreement. 3 . Table action pending further information from staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to authorize the appropriate city officials to execute the proposed amendments to the Scott County Economic Development Coalition Joint Powers Agreement. BAS/tiv Approved 3/5/91 Amended 7/16/91 SCOTT COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COALITION JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT This agreement made this day of _ , 1991 between the County of Scott, the Scott County Housing and Redevelopment Authority, the Jordan Economic Development Authority, the Belle Plaine Economic Development Authority, the New Prague Economic Development Authority and the Cities of Shakopee, Prior Lake, and Savage and shall hereinafter be referred to as the participating bodies. WHEREAS, the participating bodies are Minnesota municipal corporations or bona fide governmental entities duly organized and licensed under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, each of the participating bodies desires to work together to effectively promote economic development in Scott County; and WHEREAS, certain financial institutions, developers, and others share these interests with the participating bodies; and WHEREAS, the participating bodies historically have had a long and positive working relationship; and WHEREAS, there are a limited number of tools available to attract commercial and industrial prospects to the Scott County area; and WHEREAS, each of the participating bodies and others recognize the significant role that businesses play in contributing to the economic well being of Scott County; and WHEREAS, each of the participating bodies and others recognize that economic activity throughout Scott County will have a positive spinoff impact on their respective community and or jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, each of the respective participating bodies and others individually lack sufficient financial resources to obtain in house staff to process and package small business administration loans for interested business; and WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute Section 471.59 allows the participating bodies to jointly exercise any power common to the participating bodies or any similar powers. NOW THEREFORE, the participating parties hereby mutually agree to the following: 1. The participating parties are entering into this agreement and creating the Scott County Economic Development Coalition in order to promote economic development throughout Scott County. Since development in any one of the communities and areas within Scott County affects the other, and since a coordinated effort by the participating bodies may have greater impact and yield more benefits, the participating bodies agree to form this Coalition. 2 . The participating bodies hereby form the Scott County Economic Development Coalition. Each participating body shall appoint one representative to serve on the Board of Directors of the Scott County Economic Development Coalition. 3 . The Scott County Economic Development Coalition shall be managed by a Board of Directors consisting of not less than 7 nor more than 15 17 Directors. 4. Scott County Economic Development Coalition memberships shall be open to additional interested parties committing to a one time $500. 00 membership fee. 5. Scott County Economic Development Coalition Board of Director vacancies other than the position reserved to each participating body shall be filled by a majority vote of the Board. Each Director chosen by the Board of Directors to fill a vacancy shall hold office until the next election at the annual meeting and until his/her successor shall be duly elected and qualified. Each participating body may have two representatives. One representative shall be a Approved by representative from the Board or Council serving as motion at the participating body. 4/25/91 SCEDC may bo Qithor a ropr000ntative frem a fi eial of Board Mtg. eartioipatinq bedy'o juriodiebie!e1 arca. The beprosiente44.Toc ehl l be appei ntcd by the Ocett aunty -Bord- The Scott County Economic Development Coalition shall have one at large Board of Director position to be filled at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. 6. The Scott County Economic Development Coalition Approved by shall have the power and authority to contract with motion at and use an organization nctig te-•using aaa 5/15/91 elan-iaat}o-siaeh---_as---t-he-wig (ktesfet � Board Mtg. se•14al -.C-o. to process and facilitate the approval of SBA guaranteed loans. -r01' f^r -es-+4 ro- -ta. establfished .€ onoma€ izaticz . The Coalition may engage in other related economic development activities as selected by its Board of Directors. Provided, however, that any activity which requires funds in excess of those within the collected funds of the Coalition shall require the approval of the governing bodies of the participating bodies. 7 . The Scott County Economic Development Coalition will serve as a vehicle to further economic development opportunities in Scott County, and to promote and assist the growth and development of business concerns in said area; including but not limited to the development of marketing materials which will promote economic development opportunities within Scott County as well as within the respective participating bodies jurisdiction. 8 . This Joint Powers Agreement shall not limit any of the participating bodies from pursuing other marketing efforts. 9 . The participating bodies agree to exchange all information, data, and reports which any participating body currently has, which would assist the Coalition in carrying out its work. Said information shall be furnished to the Coalition without charge. The participating bodies shall also cooperate with each other in every way possible in carrying out the scope of services. draw=--upon---tie -sta f of the bodies to perform-any-:necessary work. Within to--dget, the Coalition also may hire ecessa:ry.. 10 . The Coalition shall have the power to enter into contracts or a contract with individual participating bodies for services as deemed appropriate by the Board of Directors. 11. One participating body shall be designated as the depository of Scott County Economic Development Coalition funds, by action of the Board of Directors at their first meeting. The depository may be changed on an annual basis, by a majority vote, or at any time if the participating body which was depository shall cease to be a participating body. The depository shall keep track of all funds available and all spent, and shall not allow expenditures in excess of the available funds. The Board may request an annual audit. In the event the Board of Directors shall desire to exceed the amount of available funds, the depository shall bring the limits to their attention. The Board shall then consult with the participating bodies and other members to determine whether or not they are prepared to provide additional funding. 12 . The Scott County Economic Development Coalition will abide by and support the bylaws of the Scott County Economic Development Coalition as attached in Exhibit A. 13 . This agreement shall remain in effect and shall govern the Scott County Economic Development Coalition, subject however to the right of each respective participating body and any other interested body to terminate their participation with at least a 90 day notice to the Board of Directors. 11 . Upon termination of this agreement, -&U.- fimished or ma.4. ,shed ..documents, data, studies,= eys., el .a sy maps models, photographs- nd imports or othor materials—prepared by e1 ex loek, -lf -of the Coalition ch. , - - - - - there -_ _ _ __tom' d-_•putt c' to distiiLutiezr, 14. Upon termination of this agreement, all property, including finished or unfinished documents, surveys, reports or other materials and all then existing funds and any and all other assets shall be distributed to the then participating governmental bodies equally after payment of all then existing debts. If at the date of termination any governmental body has ceased to exist, then its share shall pass to the political subdivision of the State of Minnesota which most directly has succeeded to said governmental body. It is the intent of this provision, controlling over all others, that upon termination of this agreement, all surplus property shall pass to one or more corporations or governmental bodies or entities organized as a political subdivision or agency of a governmental body or entity in the State of Minnesota and to be used exclusively for public purposes. 15. In the event of any claims, suits, judgments and recoveries which may be asserted, made or may arise or be had, brought or recovered against the Scott County Economic Development Coalition in which adequate funds do not exist within the depository of the Scott County Economic Development Coalition to cover any of the foregoing claims, the participating Approved by bodies shall not be liable for any ae ti. motion at g ort<ional.-i.yz=shar-Q -:in -_the cost of said claims. 5/15/91 SCEDC Each participating body shall defend and indemnify Board Mtg. acts of its appointed members, while acting in good faith within the scope of their position. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the day of , 1991. auscjoint r-, -) 7- rki 7- v MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administratorl _ FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, City Planner RE: 1992 - 1996 Capital Improvement Program DATE: October 30, 1991 INTRODUCTION: At their meeting on October 8 , 1991, the Committee of the Whole reviewed the 1992 - 1996 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) . Attached is a copy of the amended CIP as recommended by the Committee of the Whole. DISCUSSION: Staff has amended the draft CIP to reflect the changes as directed by the Committee of the Whole. The changes included deletion of the "Rain Drop" project from the Parks Projects, deletion of the Fire Station #2 Acquisition and 3M Opticon project from the Fire Projects, and typographical changes. Staff will prepare a study analyzing alternative fire station locations and present their findings to the City Council . RECOMMENDATION: The Committee of the Whole recommends that the City Council approve the 1992 - 1996 Capital Improvement Program. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer and pass a motion which approves the 1992 - 1996 Capital Improvement Program. City of Shakopee -4041gt 41PNIr f‘e 44 24 f �< 1992 -1996 Capital Improvement Program CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL Gary Laurent, Mayor Steven Clay Jerome Wampach Gloria Vierling Joseph Zak Robert Sweeney PLANNING COMMISSION Melanie Kahleck, Chairperson Eugene Allen Nancy Christensen Terry Joos _ Joan Lynch William Mars H. R. Spurrier CITY ADMINISTRATOR Dennis R. Kraft This document was prepared as a joint effort by the Building Department, Community Recreation Department, Engineering Department, the Finance Department, The Fire Department and the Planning Department. August 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A. Introduction 1 -- B. Summary of the Proposed 1992 Capital Improvement Budget2 C. Summary of the 1992-1996 Capital Improvement Program 6 1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET SUMMARY 13 A. Streets and Highway Projects 14 B. Sanitary Sewer Projects C. Stormwater Drainage Projects 15 D. Parks Projects 15 E. Municipal Building Projects 16 F. Fire Projects G. Other Projects 1992-1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY 17 A. Streets and Highway Projects 18 B. Sanitary Sewer Projects 24 C. Stormwater Drainage Projects 25 D. Parks Projects 26 E. Municipal Building Projects 30 F. Fire Projects 31 G. Other Projects 32 PROJECT DATA SHEETS A. Streets and Highway Projects Al-A39 B. Sanitary Sewer Projects B1-B4 C. Stormwater Drainage Projects C1-C7 D. Parks Projects Dl-D24 E. Municipal Building Projects E1-E2 F. Fire Projects Fl G. Other Projects 1992-1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION — Capital improvements are defined as those projects which require the expenditure of public funds for the acquisition, construction or replacement of the infrastructure necessary for a community. Typical capital improvement projects include streets and highways; water and sewer facilities; parks, trails and open space; and various types of public buildings. A capital improvement program is a listing of proposed public projects according to a schedule of priorities over a five year period. Developing a capital improvement program provides many significant benefits such as: • An effective way to plan, budget, and coordinate the operation and capital efforts of city departments. ▪ A coherent development program that will increase opportunities to obtain funding from outside sources such as the state and federal government. • Public support for capital commitments that should help attract private investment. • Improved chances to receive favorable bond ratings by giving evidence of effective management. A capital improvement budget is a list of the projects scheduled for the upcoming fiscal year. Projects which were previously scheduled in the 5-year capital improvement program are prioritized into the annual capital improvement budget. The Shakopee City Council annually adopts a 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) . The CIP is prepared by City staff and reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to approval by the City Council. The 5-year program is utilized by staff for long range budgeting purposes, programming projects and developing a priority list for the following year' s projects which are listed in the Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) . -1- Proposed capital improvement projects in both the annual CIB and the 5-year CIP have been prioritized in this document. The prioritized projects have been organized into one of the following seven types of project categories: A. Streets and Highway Projects B. Sanitary Sewer Projects C. Stormwater Drainage Projects D. Parks Projects E. Municipal Building Projects F. Fire Projects G. Other Projects SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED 1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET The top priority project in the annual Capital Improvement Budget is the new City Hall. In 1991, the City purchased the Marquette Bank building, located at the northeast corner of Holmes Street and 2nd Avenue. The renovation of this building will occur in 1992 . Staff anticipates moving into the new City Hall facility by mid- 1992 . The next three projects in the 5-Year Plan are the three major transportation projects scheduled for Shakopee, namely the Shakopee Bypass, the Downtown Bridge/Mini bypass and the Bloomington Ferry Bridge. All three projects will be constructed over the next several years. The first two projects are Mn/DOT projects and the last one is a County project so the exact schedule for construction of these transportation improvements is not entirely a City of Shakopee decision. The City of Shakopee should continue to support these projects by involvement in the Scott County Transportation Coalition and by direct financial support. These projects have long been identified as top priority projects by the City Council of Shakopee during is annual goals and objectives meetings. The following is a summary listing of the proposed 1992 Capital Improvement Budget projects: A. Street and Highway Projects 1. Muhlenhardt Road This road is currently a gravel road on a severe slope (up to 10%) that is an extremely high maintenance road due to constant washouts and poor drainage facilities. This project was included in the 1991 C. I. P. and a feasibility study is currently being done, but construction will not be possible until 1992 at the earliest. Portions of this road have been petitioned for to either be upgraded or vacated. -2- 2 . Vierling Drive (C.R. 17 to C.R. 79) This would be a new street that is needed for development. This street is on the Municipal State Aid System and due to an excess fund balance in that account will need to be constructed in 1992. 3 . Spencer Street (1st Avenue to 9th Avenue) Portions of this road will need to be completely reconstructed and other portions may be milled and overlayed. This project needs to be done prior to the downtown mini bypass opening in 1993 . 4. Apgar Street (1st Avenue to 6th Avenue) Complete street reconstruction. Current pavement is deteriorated and there is no curb and gutter, resulting in poor drainage facilities and damage to lawns during snow plowing. The railroad crossing is extremely bad due to the numerous siding tracks (9 tracks total) and the issue of improving this crossing or closing it will need to be addressed. 5. Apgar Street (10th Avenue South) Based on the recent interim ordinance study, Scott County may be building the new County Road 77 alignment with Fuller Street in 1992. If so, the City will be given Apgar Street. This street is currently a gravel street and a constant source of complaints. The County has designed this street and originally programmed the construction for 1991, but was delayed due to the City's study. The City could easily take the County' s design and construct this street in 1992 . 6. Downtown Alleys (Spencer Street to Fuller Street) The existing alleys are severely deteriorated and need complete reconstruction. Shakopee Public Utilities Commission is considering undergrounding their overhead lines and the two projects should be coordinated and done at the same time. 7 . Sidewalk Replacement Program The City Council initiated an annual program in 1990 to replace existing defective sidewalks, with an annual budget of $25, 000. 00. -3- 8 . Maras Street Currently, this is a private road located in eastern Shakopee just off 13th Avenue. There is industrial development off this road, but it is a substandard street. Currently, it is dirt/gravel with poor drainage and a severe "hump" over a gas line. It is also an over length cul-de-sac. The City Attorney is attempting to have the City obtain this road and once that occurs it should be upgraded to City standards. 9 . Harrison Street (3rd Avenue to 6th Avenue) This is the old state highway. The existing concrete is severely cracked and spauled (packed with holes) . The exact rehabilitation treatment has not been determined but it may consist of anything from milling/overlaying to complete reconstruction. B. Sanitary Sewer Projects There are no Sanitary Sewer Projects scheduled for construction in 1992 . Several sewer projects have been scheduled for construction between 1993 and 1996. Please refer to the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. C. Stormwater Drainage Projects 1. Upper Valley Drainage Phase III and IV The Upper Valley Drainage System is being constructed to provide necessary drainage for the Southerly Shakopee Bypass . Phase III and IV will be constructed between — County Road 79 and County Road 15 and to the bypass. The trail will be constructed with this project. D. Parks Projects 1. Lions Park Pond/Trial Extension The pond and trail extension will be constructed in conjunction with the remainder of the Upper Valley Drainage Project, which will be done by MN/DOT with the — Shakopee Bypass . Funding source: Shakopee Lions Club. 2 . Shakopee Municipal Pool Repairs After 23 years, parts of the filtration system and water pumps have become worn and are in need of repair. The liner beneath the sand has disintegrated and needs replacing. The pool is of vital importance to the community and greatly appreciated by its citizens. This is a high priority. Funding source: General Fund. - -4- 3 . Tahpah Park Parking Lot Extension - Trees and Shrubs Completing the final phase of the parking lot at Tahpah Park will be helpful in alleviating some of the parking problems at the site. The Shakopee Jaycees are embarking on an ambitious tree planting program for Tahpah Park. The new water supply to the park will improve the survival rate of plant life there. Funding source: Shakopee Jaycees. 4. Lions Park Tennis Courts Three years ago, large cracks began appearing in the asphalt on the Tennis courts at Lions Park. The cracks have been worsening with each advancing year. A consultant engineer recommends completely replacing the asphalt. It's possible, the courts could be used another year before anything is done to them. A crack filler has been applied. Funding source: Park Reserve Fund. 5. Stans Park Land Acquisition The Comprehensive Plan identified the need for a four acre neighborhood park near the Shakopee Senior High School. The land is proposed to be acquired through the park dedication process as the are develops into a residential neighborhood. E. Municipal Building Projects 1. New City Hall Renovation of the recently purchased Marquette Bank building will occur in 1992 . A separate fund has been established to purchase and renovate the new City Hall. Staff anticipates moving into the new City Hall by mid- " 1992 . F. Fire Projects There are no Fire Department Projects in the 1992 Capital Improvement Budget. G. Other Proiects There are no Other Projects in the 1992 Capital Improvement Budget. -5- SUMMARY OF THE 1992-1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM All other requested projects have been programmed into the remaining years of the 5-Year CIP. In addition to the table showing the proposed year of construction, there are individual summary sheets for each project explaining the reasons for the projects and the estimated costs of each one. FINANCIAL SUMMARY Shakopee has the legal capacity to issue approximately $8 , 455, 000 in General Obligation Bonds. As of December 31, 1990 the City had no General Obligation Bond indebtedness. As a result, it would be legally permissible to issue $8 , 454 , 000 in General Obligation Bonds. At the close of the fiscal year 1990 (December 31, 1990) the bonded indebtedness of the City of Shakopee was $15, 525, 000 . This consisted of $10, 950, 000 in Tax Increment Bonds, $80, 000 in Revenue Bonds, and $4 , 495, 000 in Improvement Bonds. The per capita debt which includes all bond issues, by the City of Shakopee ranks slightly higher than the average of all Minnesota municipalities both large and small . At the end of 1990 Shakopee' s per capita debt was $1, 318 Compared to the statewide average of $1, 226 (a 7 percent difference) . The mill rate or tax capacity rate is higher in Shakopee in 1991 than most of the suburban communities in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area that staff has been monitoring. Historically Shakopee has been lower. Attached are two figures (Figures 1 and 2) which illustrate mill rates/tax capacity rates. The dollar amount of the tax levy is established each year by the City Council. It is determined by adding the debt service levy and the amount of general fund levy needed for the upcoming year. The tax capacity rate is the result of the tax levy amount divided by the taxable tax capacity value in the community. The per capita tax capacity is higher in Shakopee than many suburban communities in the Metropolitan Area. This is due in part — to the substantial industrial and manufacturing base which has developed in Shakopee. It is also evident that the commercial and residential tax base provide a good balance among the categories of properties that provide the property tax base. It is felt that this proportion will change with perhaps less emphasis on the industrial base as the undeveloped portion of Shakopee reaches its potential development. -6- Figure 3 illustrates the debt service levies for the years 1980 to 2002 . Line D on the figure represents the approximate tax levy for -- debt for the 1992 CIB projects. Figure 4 illustrates the debt service levies for years 1980 to 2007. Line D on this figure represents the approximate tax levy for debt for the 1992--1996 CIP projects (5 year) . Figure 5 is a table which illustrates the two graphs in a numerical form. Capital improvement projects have been prioritized into the one year CIB and the five year CIP. In the one year budget, a total of 18 projects have been proposed for construction in 1992 . A total of 60 projects have been proposed for the years 1993 to 1996. Of the total for 1992 projects $2, 130, 000 would be funded through the improvement bonds. The total for improvement bonds is calculated by adding the general obligation bonds and the assessment figures listed in the 1992 Capital Improvement Budget. The tax levy to support such a bond issue would be approximately $85, 000 per year. SUMMARY The intent of this 5-Year CIP is to serve as a guide to the City Council to identify the future needs of the City in the area of capital improvements and to allow for the establishment of adequate funding levels to accommodate these improvements. The adoption of a 5-Year Capital Improvement Program greatly aids staff in long range planning of projects and identifying the needs of the City for budgeting reasons and for maintaining adequate personnel to administer these projects. Res• -c -full Submitted, ir4e5 / S r 'Lindbe g S. Ekola Dave E. Hutton City Planner Public Works Director -7- • VO 1- n C\ u'1 O )s CA .7 00 N t0 .7 ri r-1 .7 u1 N CA .7 un .7 to N 0 00 .7 N. O )s M 1s O O u1 u1 r-1 N r-I u1 M N VO N O N r♦ .7 C+ O i- N. r-1 O O .7 N C1 00 V0 CO r-1 O 01 00 u1 r-i .7 00 C' C, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cm M 1- u1 u1 N .7 N r--1 I. C1 i- U1 .7 O M .Y .7 u1 Cl u1 C'. el 00 r-4 N N N r- r-4 N r-1 N r-i r-1 r-1 1.-1 N N r-1 e-i ri r-I r-I r-I r-i N r-I r-i Cl 00 r-I CO 1- r-1 N0 is N0 Cm r•I 0 )- u1 .7 un 0 u1 '.O .7 00 00 N N .7 N- N Cm .7 Cl I- VO 1s 00 u1 00 Cm O %.0 01 CA CO Cl is Cm i- CU 0 C` C+ N00 .7 .7 00NNJ - Nu1r-1 '.0 in CD CI CA d )- N i, . CT • • . VO M )-s .7 on u1 u1 O u1 1- 00 n S on M .7 NO .7 O u1 O N1 Cm r-I r-I N N M r-4 N rI N e-1 r-I .--I r-1 N N r♦ r-1 rd .-I N e-4 N N r-1 •ri w N c' 00 1 co u1 .7 d M O O u1 M on on 0p - r4 .7 C\ - ND ..0 Cm _... Oa\ 00es. .7N Ou1V0VO NN '.ON .7ON .7 '.0 .7V000 d C' O on .T 40 u1 e-I ri CT V0 N i- N O u1 N r-i V0 u1 is. u1 N u1 N CO • . . • . • . • . . • . . . . • . . . . CM u1 O r-I .7 O r-1 !r1 u1 .7 .7 u1 '.O N r-i r-I r-I 0 N u1 O 00 O '.0 r♦ N N N ri N r-I r1 r4 r-I r- .-I N N r-I ri r-I r-1 r1 r-I r1 N r-i CO - C+ .7 r-I .7 00 O C\ n ,T n cr1 M CA c•'1 N N 00 O u1 VO u1 CO CO r1 40 1- As ri .7 u1 M O r+ - ,7 r♦ CT .7 C1 N O .7 Cm on 00 N- .7 VO .-a N '.0 V0 CA CO N M .7 on O 00 un )s Cm 01 CA r4 CO N CO CA 00 1s O Is ul V0 u1 CT CO CM ra CM 1- n Cr1 .7 '.0 .7 O el O.h .-a .-. r-i r-I N on M r-I N ri ri r4 rI N ri N N rl r-I r-i r-I N ri N N N N 4) 1.1 43 O )- .7 '.0 00 N- 00 u1 .7 I- .7 u1 r1 O r-I N r-I u1 .7 C' N O N O: Cm '.0 '0 CA .7 n .7 n n %0 on O M ri V0 Cl Cm u1 r-i CA Cl u1 .7 i- i- f'1 '0 1s O on O N CM rd CA N N .7 )s r-i %0 111 N- N•.7 '.0 M J,.) CA ), CO O u1 u1 l0 u1 C1 10 00 .7 O r.1 M N .7 on .. C1 .7 cm n r-I •r1 r-I ra N UI M r-i N r-i r-i r-1 r-i N N M el ri r-I r-i ri 1•1 r-I r-i N N U 44 Cl. W OS a) -- • U a) a) G >l G t) a) � U 4i I. yca 03 4) G )1 431 a . 1-) .. E-' 04 .y. a) ..-1 .. r-I r-I a) 0 a) d .r 0 0 a) `-' a) CQ U1 ..0 ft) G G r-1 Q) r-I 00 e-4 •r1 CO H '. •.-1 >> a) ..) VI 4.7 34 0 >, •d ,•I> r •rI r-1 > >,.r1 1-1 3.1 a) a) 1-+ _ m 4..) G. a) G a0 c0 O F+ u r-1 > .4-4 1.1 •r1 U) 4) .G W O or) oO.r1 U >, .0 ca 0 ' u) G 0 G co 0 Gco (0 r�-1 a> cia) aa)) G 10 0 a) -0 03 4)) )C-1 4.) 4.) a) > •,a )a 0 (4 >, a) G 0 1-1 00 a.xa 3 U) G .r1 r-1 .��xnn 0 u a) N 0 0 (/ CI ) 00 .--4 w £ awa raw ¢.a Z Z c. 0 .-7330 6 � --. G a) O +-1 h G u as •d .1.1 00 r�-1 E C .) C 0 4C) CO .0 •r1 0 0 0 03 aa)) 03 6 0 al 0 0 v1 U .. C Ix 4 -8- CO .7 N. N in r1 OO .7 sr 0 N . N eh 1\ %O N '0 N N N .--i CT, ..•-I UI e•1 N. r- . M to ef1 .7 \O en en ^ n J .-1 .7 i u1 e'7 r4 u1 .7 en N eh rl e•1 Om VI .7 N .-d '.D M M e'1 to .7 in CT 0 1-) ON N CM - N In '0 0 rr e'1 .7 0 ON en 0 sr N .•d eft en \C 0 cc 1 H0 r•"I N r-1 .--1 0 .-4 0 ,.4 .-1 0 0% at 0% 0 .-i .-1 .--1 0 0 0 0 .-1 0 .-d r-1 -1 r+ rr .a 4.-1 4.-1 4-1 .-1 r-1 4-1 r♦ re .-1 41 r♦ . 1 r-1 r-1 • N N N CO '.D '0 '.0 .7 VD VD 0 u1 UI e+1 co N co co co O O O en o eft e1-1 u1 N 0% 0% M u1 en en .-i .-1 .-1 4--1 t\ . r-1 M ON %D '.0 VO N en � - - .7 r-1 N N N 10 n e- e•1 e•1 enr-1 .7 .7 en .7 en e") e•1 e7 .7 CA 4-4 �D O\ VD N J .7 N .--1 r4 e+1 M 0% O+ N eft 0.% in r••• CT .7 e•'1 e-1 N 0` eel 0 0 40 J07 00 VD CD 0 M .7 .7 h 0 eft u1 e- N in N N .7 in e- n eft N VD eft to Cn O% 0 O\ 1",. N 0 CO 0o M CA la N O .-I u1 r-1 r•-1 e•'1 N '.0 e. .0 00 0o 0 uI at eft at en n u1 u1 e*1 R'. e) C: in in In eft u1 eft in In u1 .7 u1 .7 .7 10 u1 in Lel .7 1 1 u'1 tel u1 eft VI 4-) •.i e1 r1 e•1 en 0 0 -d .7 .7 0' 0000 000 040 .7 .7 .7 .-d C) >1 .7 sr .7 .7 en e•1 .-1 .-i .-1 .--i %D '.D 'D '0 u1 1f1 in 0 0 N N N n 0 11 0 0 N 0 0 N N .-1 ra ri re eb CO Co CO CO CO CO .7 CO '0 '.0 'D .7 N U 0 g:4 M M ene•1 en en en en en en 0 0 0 0 N N N N M e•1 c•1 e+1 N N N N en 03 B� Zv n N. 0% to r1 N- C+ ...1 N '0 .7 r CO + .-1 .7 eft C•4 a% .7 in .7 .7 .� N 0 00 .7 ^ .7 e- e•1 N. u1 rN 0 0 eft 1 r..1 in N1 N N eVD 0 00 .V s_ 0 -. 01 0 N es .7 0 0 .7 N CTD CO '. CO .--1 0 M CO 111 r-1 .7 CO CT •''1 0 G: N N N .-1 .--e N 4-4 N r1 .-i .-1 .--1 N N .-i r-1 .4--1 .-1 .-4 to ON M CO -) r-I 4.-1 N r.1 3.4 to ,,..1 •C 1J 0 S-+ •CA0 0 4.) •.1N 0 E 0 >+ 0 u o 0 0 )-1 0 U 0 .moi 40.) °O 1-1O 0 X Cl) .0 0 0 0 .r-1 era .Oe �es0.-4 ...i to 0 >>U .-. L1. ' .7 .-1 ..e .-1 Ga a) 0 ea 10 0 6. 0 .� > ..1 ).4 •.1 Cl)> 0) .0 3-4 14C) 0 0 0 .•' 0 00 Sr ea .Y . 0 0 .. al 0 0 > AO > b .�1 E W .j o c u > 0 0S.i ea C0 ECCO C to .•e 0 0 0 0 o 0 'C 1) 34 G U vii to a 7 U .0 C. w ".1 14 0 COa7....X 3 0 0 •.-4 .0 ,44 0 0 „� = m cOAW � cl Zai wU � 3U d - y Ch ...1 .-. ••••1 CA Cr, 0 .-I 0 4-) C 0 CO 0 „•1 1J T111) 0. .--+ ro 0 U 0 0 4.) 4.) ea ..-1 - >> 0 0 0 . E •0 .) •r+ 0 0E 0 0 '_ = C. 0 u] U 0 a < 3 -9- N w" / " 4 r 0 an C.:1 T cn U TI h C) to 0 cn a 2/1- A N Ll O, U U c, c-1 N "' is Q1 U) an (1) 4..,..,,,,..::........: H e VJ -•-i N •� tr.1 U v an )4 U CT)-4 ch v - Q1 CI) > •� J 1-4 4-) ..Q 3a r— v a t/) --1 C] U b' • VJ i A Q W O Ga v cn >a U sa w 4— •� w y 6:n w ? + o , CI v T - >>+w >>+a� W , C) co > x L to 4\1:\ , X -1J C) E+ 'C) E L) r i •l a) -' r+ ZX vac ^oo , - a) C s..4• .LJ ..Z a U U U 04 M < < Er--------....----'8: i i i i — It N < U Q i} ,- zzzz ro H H H H r 1 I I` I I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 10 O N O (spucsnoj) -10- cn U I N -n Lc) O� a 10 CA c oN 7,...,,,*,-------------- r7 I N N an rn N I -% o -, 1--1 Z Q Q, CO c, In cs, M L., W a N On -.U-i p 0 OU J 1.0 � U �H n rn W -,.i C • O N ' _ IC) > • y cd CO O � '> -, a VI --4 A `-(4. O J rn C.) W 3-r r' rn a 1) _ $.4u 7.4 c.. Z V J L 4 W 4.1 "-Cr) v s., > .'4 4— to _ Cl >w >a w 4.3 O v p 0C.) C) O >\ . t4 RS a� -- al Q Cl � ft � o — U b ,� H .E CO a z r-i z x N "0 ru "c 0 U C La ^ y CL El a to U U U C. b Cn < G7 < r _ i() III I q < QUCI E t q H � H � ..... r(7 litta KJ N b CO — I I I I I I` I II b 0 OOOCaaa c 0 Cl c0 N to to ri N r (SpUpsnOt.4 j) -11- • 1 oo _ o — N rn N as a o P N n 0 w 0 d •n a e r . n ✓ 0 n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 Ias 0 li"\' h i o 0 0 Za n o n .. a n n n o n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a bo 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n r r a St� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < 0 0 0000000000000 • j - • - - • . • c V u a v c o 0 0 0 0 0 000 000 ▪ >a a . . 01 •. 0 . . 0 0 0 o C 0 < • o . 0 O a o 0. 0 'c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 < 0 0 0 Oos 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 sr a an o n n n .. n .. n n n n 0 c 0 0 0 0 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i t o 0 0 0 0 0 P t O O ^, < ' C .000 .11. 0000 .1 OA la y a " a O " .� N N .. �O 'Z re a re " G C a W • O ± N < C O > O 0 a .. . . n n . . n O N " P > S 0 0 re c r • nn ann .' s " < a 0 — vn. J ■ • 2 • O 0 n • O n as 0 el 0 o >oal a p n u " 5 a N n n � C 0 — 5 a O O • C .. r > 0 0 a a 0 02 a o r at 0 on en el >• 0 P p 1n0 n n n 0. • S i C a U - " 3 a < o < > C —' o o r Pa • " an n n j r 2.b % a• n " 5 a N N n . P n 0 0 0 O 0 J N n n N N N .. v 0 • N o- . n w w N C S.: N n .. .. . . . . . . . . . as 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 Y J —12 i i i. i. t i i i i i r i 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... . I- 0 0 VA Ln 44 4.4 Lc.: o 0 _ cD cc cc 1--. X < ex z 0 cp 0 - o 0 W , ¢ 44 -..? 44 a 0 fal ).- ix 0 0 0 0 0 0 G CC 0 0 0 - w - 0 0- 0 2 LU 0 0 0 CO .G CO, V/ CV 44 44 c0 44 V) 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 .... Ci) I- < 0 rn 0 WI 1— 0 44 0 VI Z 0 0 W LU > 0 0 0 0 IL Ce LU G C))0- LU .. u.r, r•^1 49 tt% r•-) 4, . W v, LU 44 L, >" > ce F.5. 0 0 0 -• CC 0 V) CA 0 LA 0 0 0 111 CC 2 IL 0 V/ CV 40 LI-A l',./ ..- Ct.. 0 V) < CV CV 49 V1 4.4 0 0 2 ..._ C)) 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 z trl Lin • . '0 4,A sO 44 - CD - = 0 0 0 0 1.1.1 < X 0 Lf10 0 0 0 0 111 < J- 1.1.1 0 •-• > 2 O 0 MI' Lrt 0. ,1 0... Le, f%) . 0 1 NI I— .- 44 eNJ 0- 44 C..) 1.4 44 _ X •-. - a. . . . .0 0 0 0 < . . . . . _, . . 0 . 0 .. - . . .. (....) - . . MI 0 I.C1 04 L/1 in I-- LI 0.1 .- IN1 CV . . 44 44 NI 4.4 44 44 C\I U.; X I- C) > < z - ,.... .. L. 0 0 .-• 01 •-• 05 CO C C) C C L- C C -le C. - L. -/ C) - L, 4, 4. ....= - 4, - C L. C - C C.) - 4, .0 < LU 4-, cn C CJ L. C a. .- - 5 8 1- - C Cl) 0 I- C = , 0 = Cl) ••-• a _. co _ ce un X a ..- - c...) ' 0LU < co c..) a Lu 0 = = a _ • -13- MI L •••••1 . ..- . . .. ....., LI- •-• LL1 CD 0 0 X < 0 I. .. CL 2 0 .-• ' 0 — III - < IA 0 0 CI CZ 4C et 0 0 0 0 0 0 . ..., CD 0 -- 2 U.1 0 0 CO < Cil C.4 .... IA IA . . . IA 2 _..- • 0 ...•• .. . I- • .. C) .. z . . }--. 00 . ..... Z L1.1 LI > le ., < cn 3.4 cc LLI ..,.. . . ....... 5 0 0 0, o 0 0 0 0 u) 0 col v, o 0 o 0 0 0 . 0) o . 0 0 . 0 CD 1." CC 2 3- 0 LU cn cn 0 131 4- 0 0 111 CD L" 44 0 cr, IA 0 0 P•1 CD ".1 44 IN 4- 44 04. 2 0 < 434 4.1 4.1 LL . 2 . . . . . . 0 0 cn CD CD CD CD 3 p . .. 0 2 0 • 0 0 cm 44 414 IA I- 2. ....1 LU 41C X . CD 1/1 _ I- 133 0 4. < •-• > 2 0- 0 0 CV 1"-. a cc 1.... L.) a. 4.4 — 1:1- — < -1 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,- (A 0 0 0 1." CD 0 1 CD 0 " 0 0 ....1. 0 CO U) MI IA 4/4 434 44 434 44 44 . . . .. . . 0, 0 0 .0 •E' > c_ eo 0 A, CC ct '5 th c..) C\I UJ 0 > • 11/ .3.., 4.) 0 > .-.• C) I Ce es) .0 e.) = eft) Col co —• U C) < 2 4-• L • C U i- ..• .3-, 0,. C3 .•-• I. ..0 0 1- 0 -. •-• LL. C3 -- E cil .... .... .... .,c (7) •-• u " 0 0 C ...• 0 .. CA 0 IA •••• 0 Ci L. .-. 0 L. 4 • C IX 01 U.I • 0 2 ..- -. I, U • C. 0 • L- 61 3 0 0 > 0 1- At t.- 3 . ,._ - C <I./ R `>' E < .... C.1 -. C. CC -. 10 S. 4Z C L3 CC C. ..0 .•- < < < .0 3 C 3 ±., U) .•-• c.) • ..., .... 0 0 E. 1 — :3 U CC cn ._ cr, .— .— .— cr) I- .- M.1 P." ...1. 1." ‘CD l's C..3 LU • < < -3 CD 0 Z CC 0. P 0, 0, 0, CS 0, C. -.., -14- . . . . 0 0 0 0 o o - . b- o o lin In c'.1 C0 44 LLI 0 L.7 0 H X < CC 2 0 .... C 0 LLI - -CG/7 CC -.7. 4" 0 0 0 )•• et 0 0 0 0 0 < CC 0 0 0) D - w = LLI 0 0 0 CO 0.4 IA <3 44 40 IA V) 0 = 0 C 0 .-. CO I- 0 Z › u > cc o o o o 0 VI CA 0 0 0 LCI 0 C) C) 0 CC 2 - u.1 CA 0 CD CV •ID 0 VN 0 tr. a. = . < . .-7 IA IA LL. IA ...- . 2 ..... CI VI 0 • C3 .. 0 2 ift • 0 .i . U CC1 '4 414 I- 2 0 0 0 < X 0 0 til 0 CD < I-• tu 0 ...? MI. Lel 0. /*I H < CC C-) CL •- IA 4- IA .- 44 X ••• • •-• cl_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 I- VI 0 C 0 CD 0 ...I. 0 CV 0 0 0 0 0 .1 0 NI I- L) •-• 4- MI .- .- 44 .0. IA 44 . 44 44 44 40 . C 0 4C ei > C C.-• 0 0 CD , 2 0) C- --I 63 4( C. C. J., (41 I•••• 0 e3 C3 CD I- L3 V) 0 0 ... 0 I- • ..... cn .... Cl. 'T" -) e3 CA • .7) -• 6.1 = C C3 4.) CL CL X L. < -I •-... CI V O. = -0 E L. 0 U U.I • ••4 .< C..) 0 a , 0 0 z f0 NI e0 C0 CV a. -15- I mil i inft /f 0 0 U. 0 ..... ....._ )-- 0 UI CIJ 44 UJ 0 CO CD 1.'"' X < CC 2 •-• 0 0 0 LU C6 2 ...? 64 C1 a CI I.. CC 0 0 ...... 6C 2 0 = N- 0". 2 Lu 0 CD < (fl Cd) co sok cn 0 o 0 0 .... = 0 to) 0 o 0 0 o o 0 .-. . . CI) ,- < i.r, ...? v, ...., 0 /.."1 CD NI I— . 0 C 46 64 .- 44 ..- 64 Z 0 o 0 LULU > 0 C. 0 0 0 • 0 • 2OC LU.c CA UINIin NIUI NI 64 44 44 1.1.1 41 Lu • CC ......_ C..) > CC 0 O (.4 . 0 .4 C-7 Ul CC 2 .... U./ V) 0.1 .- — C VI ill = < U. .4 • 2 . .._ . . . _... • C 0 = UI • 0 11.• 44 1... X . 0 0 0 0 • I -J I.11 - 0 0 0 0 -.. < = 0 0 0 111 < I- Lu en — > z c) 0 0 CV. 0. 0 = 1,1 UI WI NI F". < CC U. C LI .-- 44 U C 44 V 4.4 UI O. 44 ..., CL. — 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < -J 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .< 0- .• . . . . a1.- L$1 0 C UI...T UIKt LA ..1. V', C 0 06 LA UI t-- C. 60 44 V/ CV CV ('42 64 64 44 . NI --. 64 U) C. • •.- C C\I4 LU ... CC cO C. 0 .• .... Z ..< LAJ 2 -V 4) -1C •••• •-• C -J CT) < C. c = C-. ... C. ce co L. ..- CO VI -1 < c0 0 -I < .< )- .••••• 0 ›.C.-.I C) .- 0. 0 C. 41 O. ... 0. = /- 4-, ca I-- 0 0 C- ‘.) C0 = CA Cr /-- 4... > I- LIJ 0 CM 41 .., 0 . U C2 ••- 0 a3 0 T -, C. C ',11Q C (.3 C < = Ci C 7 2 0 •....= -- C 0 0 cn CJ VI < 04 c0 -1C 0 .... VI a. 1.- C. _J -/ ..-- VI -2 r..) L.7 E = _ 0 0 0- J C.) F. I- en ..4VI r... LI LLI • C 01 0 w , 0 — 0 2 CV CV 04 tIl CC 0. 0. C). 0- a. -16- I I I I. I I 1 I I I, I I I. I I 1 N F- 2 W f 6 U 2O O O O O _ < Op OO 0O OP CL pp vM O VI VI v to 0.1N CI N � N v N N N N N OOO O O O O cc O O O O O O O O O O 0 ^ pNp� O N LL 2 U ^ P co d �^ O cO ON 144. N N - _4. Q .A N vJ U N N N N r p O O O O p N o O O O O �" 2 O O O O L_ O ...7p '1' U N O O `O e i ti N O CO N M O ' N tel N N N d 111 w LLJ > O O O O O O O O O O O O it.LJ NI O O O O O O O 44 CO g CD 04 LA 0 CO VI 0CCO COp W N N O C _ M `} CC N N OO O O O O O C O N O O O N O ' CCL pN p ON O 4/41 O O O NN N N 5 J N N f— N N M N N S 4 I.L 0 W U O O I- O CO O 2 2 0 Ct 0 CD N 0 T w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' r- 0 0 0 0 0 o 4.4 oO 0 0 0 0 0 0 `V ~ 2 �O -1 P M N CON /D W N T .. 0 N M v .O I— v) N N N N N CO Ln N O r U II 2 0 CO0 63O C L a ca a) N cc 3 3 O 7 J U L a) m J d (n O CO L d H 63 -- U U U U CJ 4- N aJ U 67 — 4! LLI 4- O` C 4 .0. L. m 0 C O .^ O c O b. d CO1 U. O. 0 a � w CO a a z: a CL d m U G W W U —17- • I N r a . W O 0 O L) 3 U L E L E C O C C> O 0 • U U 6.. U U ,. I 2 \ \ \ \ \ \ O \ \ \ O •O \ \ \ C /Y P \ \ \ v', {1. P \ \ \ N \ \ \ 84 _, 0 \ \ \ �/ \ \ \ \ \ \ p \ \ \ \ \ \ O 111 \ \ \ • \ \ \ V1 O_ .- \ \ \ M \ \ \ . �- \ \ \ U \ \ \ n CACA \ \ \ \ \ \ O . z o v U P \ \ \ \ \ \ 01 MS W \ • \ \ \ - \ N O L. \ \ \ \ \ . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Q .._ W W \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ T \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O 0 O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O W M \ \ \ \ '66. \ \ \ \ . N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 to O0 CI- .-• \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ v N CL ce d \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 O N \ \ \ \ \ \ U \ \ \ \ \ \ O ^ 0 Cl) O. \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 N \ \ \ \ \ \ N 44 \ \ \ \ Q y N m N W - C) N L U 47 w C, C C Lco y Q O O ClCQm ol oco\ O •• OC CC W. 0 CVI JC, J-Q >OG _ 0 0 m <CC C) - CO = 0 'o0co � U. U 4. C C) V N C. . U T W O O O 0 0 0 0 I 6- 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 = O 0 0 O O 0 0 (V — O 0 0 0 0 0 0) r•- 0 0 0 V1 -T 0 N —. •• TN O O O N n.CS) W O Q O N M N C) f•• M N N 44 N 6- 0 N T U U W O 2 N >. Cl. N C! CI -. O. >- 2 Cl. = 0 N .0 C7 42 Q r•• N 4- C) 0 0 O C) C: Y E C7 0. 0 C C) CC ...1C .. > C] <o = •-•Ce 0 S -0 Q .. U 3• L LI U m \ L 'C 0 2 p 0 U 0 CI N C) CO L C u 0 W C! C) C Q G N ._ co -2N > C N d 1- I- 0 L 0 C/ Q C7 W U Y CO C L • 0 CC W W C7 CC L C L CI CC C a '' 6- 0 N = U 0 0 1'- > U Q CC iC CC F- a. • Q• s < < < < < < —18— > 43 L V 0 17 M CI 0 L C/ a. a/ = N 2 <M 'O cc C V 0 cc Lf1 AQ 2 -. (J) p f Cc N Z a . SW• O L < W "' 0 >- 00 O 0 0 0 0 . > 0 M p 0 O ifv 0 O » 44 `" CC CC 0. _ CL 0 0 O 0 0O 0 0 p O O 2 N p p 0 0 Q 0 •- CO .— v M M M H 44 N F".' N co co N N N co N N N NN W N 0! d4) 0 U d N N N W co CL to co N N ul < \ \ \ \ 6/1 \ y !� ,. •,,y U C.7 < 0 00 < < O 0 U _Z qC O O O i C) L6- , c7 v p V v' C) T— 0 W 0 0 00 C 00 - O 0 00 0 0 0 0 _. In kr% CN O C p m r .r .r 0 V) M M W 44 44 44 44 CD W 44 44 C) r N Cl) — 0 T c.1 W CI a. y N L N 52 < 0U I—Oc./ C .. C — O r C C y j 4CJ C.1) > CC L d a+ c L < L < a.. 2 C: 4) N U 4.., O 0 O 4) JC V1 C Cl) L Hy 0 L I— G - '0 C O] .t C •0 N 0 N 4) N v es 0 y 0 < C! 0 co ✓ 0) N C L �+ W U 4 _ O CQ ' E .+ GL. "J L Y W .Wj ^ r a.i C > (0 m L 43 - C < O ¢ < < 2 = M E > co C: a. 0 eD P ' < < < —19- 1 O L . a. CO • 13 i • C.• O CO M ••• .+ 0 .0 U v L v ✓ W T.0 C O C) -- U t CJ +. >> z P O • O Q o 0 CC gz ti /R N OO /Y O • CC pp O P CL 2 O O O N • N • CO 3- . LI • ~ O N O O O O .t O O te,U O • P W M N N • C L W WO Y O • O W M O O N //�� d N LL CC O 0. O O 2 N p O O O O CO .-• M N J N Q Hy y y N y Ol y y y ^ W0) y y 61 y d LL U y L 07 N to y < y 01 < y < y \ 20 < < 0 < 0 y 0 m • o u u u p CO CO O m O Q) C3 v, v> v n v Q) T ' W '- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O < O O O O O O O N = o 0 O o v; o 0 • ►• O In O CO ^ O M H M M N N .t P V1 W N N N N N N N In L7 O T U — W O .f V O ti Y > .+ y 2 L y C,-- C. C!1 O < 0 < O . M Cr = L y C •.• L • 0J cc V C u ee > 07 > • C/ 7 > K O N > cc L u L L _. L UV• u U .-• O .0.. G 0 < 0 G O . W t < G CJ L 2 0 ^ C ^ O 0 •C t� r L O l- H U .a n 0 CJ Cl •• — W U C L • L. • C C L. • y v W W V 0 CC 6/ = O S ,0 cc L a. C '- O H P > U > U C7 N > U CL N NO .f N CC O. •O OP N N T. D 4 C) u 3 > 0 6! O\ U E c. c .0 2 CC N . . -- O O O Q O cc p O mi r R P W V OO O CC O //•�� Q O . C N M ,-- CI) O f— p" O O N 0 0 L. O & O O W M4.4 . O W W O O 0 )- O O00 G O w M p p O O CL p N O N 4.1 CV 1.4M cd L^^L O. 2 CV P U Q L q Cl q 01 o q �� N o6ql v Cu V W q q co q N CL U CI N al q q K N d d d d \ N H N N N N C7 U _ v Z d en a a m m m m 0 N V/ N 0 0 0 0 VI T. W O O O O O 0 p I O O O 0 0 d O p p C C O O = O O O O O • N O O /� H O O— - N N N N _ VD N N A M p ~ ~ w T/ W M N N r C T" U U W O CC y L 4 L L E °J d O o y 3 • 3 _ 0 Y G d Z 4 = CJu. y v Q = — ° d r U .• N C v u O O N •• Oy Isa O O 2 W N ^ • > Cl N M C C VI C.) ,- u L. d m 6 O O ,O > e. 6 t r.. y C W U Y ;t; L O r. u Y W W L L K <p r U r n• ✓ O E N CC i-. ! CO O. N M v N CV CV ry <V I N N Nd d d < < d -21 . .. I . . . . . • . ... ..... . .. . .. , • 2 < .0 a O . . . 0 o cm o CC o o o C o C a C cm o C C cm C • • . g o g cmo g I a. 2 g LA 0 IA O. IA •0 0 •.- 41.1 en 401e en en .-- 110 ..• ..... 44 01, • . ' .. . CC cn — • .. = Z 0 (..) -..i. . g • ..... LLI „. - . 0 . • .. < • 111 w • .. > 0 Lu en cn g 0 0 a 0 ... _ CC ec O. c_ . .. & .•1 < — LO 01 VI La =•=I cn 4.1 0/ LLI C/1 CO oe 0 < 0 < < S (A ...... cn 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 tn • (0 z 3 0 0 0 0 o C.) o 0 0 T ' . • ..0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn cm o cm in o IA 0 •0 C) tn cla en en 1/1 40 CA I-- 0 Tc.., C..1 ........ IL 0 -1C cc ..- •.0 . 2 > ›- z 0 • < = CC CC F ra eu 0 IL F < -1 = tal — t/ VI • C IA Cl/ C F C F -C < I.- .• LI U < -14 Z CO < t.) < — IL L.) 0 .0 GI t• 0 F 13 X L.. cil ci a . CV PA P.1 r."1 PA WI PA . .. . ......_ • G o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 ,0 - - v ° -t WI O 0 M CC P v R N N . N V N N O O LL{ 1ppA.. L 2 ^ P O 1...r W CO (� 7 7 O HN O Z P U P n N '1, W ._ M1 LLQ O _ 2 eN 6 W W o 0 O O O W InP O P COP O $ N _ /Y O. N LL CC . O Li. O O N p Q N vv N N Q N N y N N d Ne.) N co N u.4 co CJ .A N U H N N < N y a U p O CI ° = m O < CD CC ? o 0co 0 VJ C7 0 co V V/TT r W o 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 O 0 O < 0 N = v O O O O H M O O 00 s0 • N M N N W N P T I V' N of N 7- O W C • CC O d O > 2 CC 7- N Cl ✓ < L d ✓ to L O 88 U V c7 L Cl d O ✓ N -- i W C - c 0.7 > O C O < W I- 7- < 6 W W U " CC - -` pC W W `J ;A L L w C H cc O M 3 0 -t s U " N "' N CC 0. .O ^ CO P M M M M -2 3- . ... I . . .•:. •. ..... .. . .. . _ ,... • . V) I.- 2 — Ill x C..) ....... . M < .0 CC g ..- 0 0 0 0 CC LA 0 0 . 0 0 . Clm g 0 LA . .. . 0 4A 4.44 •- . •• • • •-• .. 1.- •. . Cr) C...7 . . 0 • • • 1- 0 0 CD 0 — . cn 0 CD .. .. . • •- 0 g 0 0 •-. Li u 0 0 . — . . - ..- 2 ._ .... •. . LLI w o CD CD CD 3. 0 0 CD 0 > 0 MI 0 0 . 0 . 0 . IJJ g 0 0 V't LA 0 VI 0 I- pi PA •••0 •-• ts- 0- 44 ' 4A 4A IA CC 0 CZ 0. ci. 2 CLI ....., g . imml < w 3 032 CL c_7 cc 4_ 33 tn 7 . cl.7 Ln 6.7 2 3 4.) •- 0 > 2 0 0 . c... ›.. L. Cn 0 -• 0 01 0 0 L.. cel ....• CO • L. C.0 2 3 0 _ C c1.7 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 • C.+ C) — NT 087. 0:9C: 087. < 0 0 . ,.. . .... •-• 0 CA w pn 4A Cs . .- 4A s0 .- MI CD 4- cn 4A 4A 0 'T ' u — 1.- ..... to. 0 = • L. L. CC 0 CC 0 , C.I ap O. - c.. 4., U CA C.. -• CC I.- 0 • L VI 41) --. L..) cc 0. I••• U C C) 61 cD 2 0 2 . Iv - CL CO C.1 •-• C. C.I LL U.: ...J ce CJ 0 V) L• C ).• V) VI .4 LU U (..) ••• •••• .. 03 0 /- U..1 CJ C). L. 4.. 0 CC I-• ).- 0 •••• is. -C' L. 0 0 C L. < 00 cc C CJ 4.1 ....., C.• LI I- = < I- •- . > o I3I .2 > ..• •-• CA 1-• C-J CC < C M •J < 0) 2 < < 0 > C-7 4.. V) 0.I Cn 4.• V3 CC CO 2 *0 0. • .- MI PA V' 03 02 al co 02 .. . • . • 1 -• . .. . . . ... . . .... . 0 = CA L. 1- .... 2 CA (il LU C ctl g 0 <1 o C. ,- .0 ).. U _ 0 .... .., X 3 2 . . . . . . . . . _ < .. g 0% Lel g CV g N. CC .- ....r IA LA 44 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC Lil ...1 0 g g Kt in Cl- 0 ... IV .0 46 ..1. 44 44 .- --. I- Cr) a.a. 0 , • IC<0CC—<_>0CC21LZL-S-DLLL-LC.—)-11I ,..)...1 2=c->a00-• 600c). 2cc40C0• >cC• 00Doe.- ..1. 2,c:>60000=CCL.eJ1. -- =— .> , 0C000•.00400c4C00a00OI.A-.0s94o..sI•1..• _ Co. 0. 0' ....;. 0. •••77 1 X ¢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..111 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD IA . IA 1 cn .._ u., 0 (..1 -.1 cc 4, 44 V a. c) ,...• o,) c.) c) , LLI C C CO 0 C < 0. •-• I- 0 61 CI CI •-• CC •-• ›. gr- 4, co E < -1 )- ___ 3 )- 1... 0./ ••• C L. L. L. 61 C- CJ < til ‘11 C .- ..., a — ca •••• 3 •.- VI CC I- 0. 0 0 0 0 N_ N .- N 2 W C Cl V) L U d U L tO U < C- M a • O O /� p•pO. O LL P LA N _ 0 O/� O O O CC O O CDO VL P N N 0.m . 2 N O CO I- U CL O • 1- O Z Cil C W O g N S U N L O CC W w o > 0 W 0 O pMp. N N P N O d s M 6L cc O a. CL O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O N p. O O O O Lt-, P .T M M -.3- .T .- N N N N N J Q I-- ^ LIJ N L.7.. U O 03 z cn O O CA O a m Q 0 0 z o m O C C co C L C SC L L O O U O CO O 0 0 • VJ o a c a c O. O. 0 CD T ' W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a o 0 o 0 0 0 0 o . .- .f M .T M v N CO N M N N N N VJ w N N O T U C 7 N O a• L y O L Q 2 N J N r- L o C ra o u u O -41 _ L . Y d t 7 CL X O CL Cl N TA CL _ NW O L C J r- 2 a sc .- -NZ - o U U Y L \ Y L O N W N L 0 C L O 47 0 O W 0 cO © CL O MI U a. CL -X J 0 C O. L d N CL J. L. v CC .- •- L L N M o Vl c3 N 2 2 N W O Y C C L - O C7 C• co Y 3 7. Y O a O X U U 0 0 A CC O J CL S CC .- W J .- N < 0 2 CO 4 2 O. a N M .t N •O 7,- 0 O O C] O O O O • —26— .. . .... cn . I— = ku g 2 . 0 0 0 0 ..0 .. 0. CC g 0 ..9 4,0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC IA 0 0 ,.. 0 g U.. 2 g •-• 0 .4. 1.4 I4 101 •-• 44 0 ...... U 0 CC 1.-- 0 F 0 C/I Z 0 = c c,...? c7 . C-5 0, 2 . < 0 LU t.1.1 0 > ,-. 0 CI Fel d; Q' i w cv O 0 0. .- 4, CC 0 CC O. CL 2 CU 0, 0, -J 6) I--- Vf .... UJ 0 0 0 0 61 < E v, > > > > > L. ,.I.. „_ ,_ L. 0 ,L, N 0 V 0 N C cn In 0 0 Z N 0 0 0 Cl ul 16 c 4.1 nJ 0 0 — — ce — ec cx cc ... C o ..... 4_a, = ...v m 4' -X to -X ...,C -,4 0 L.C C c C _ .. .' c- fc o as L c 0 _ c c_ c c... es o C) C, 0 CS CC 0 0- 0.- d 0 C) 1— 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 00 0 0 0 0 I ..:( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x . .. . . . C\I ._. . 0 t”\J 0 If' CV 0 ....T 0 0 0 0 . Cs.J ,0 41.. • (4 44 .-. 44 4.4 44 IA 44 C) 1.L1 44 C) (in 0 c...) T .... 0 -I 0 0. = ') o C -1 01 C co - .- 44 cn .... .- _. ,-. S a. I_ 44 .1.e C .14 C ._. C C (.4 - c C L L 0 .- ..v 0 O. .- .X 1.-. cc CoC a - = ra .. a ,... Li Li ..,‘ g. 0_ a. 0. 0 . c LW V) 3 .. ..- C T. 6) 0 w c., ... - .7.1 - 0 65 O. 0 •.... _ 0 CI ..- .- Id -. 0 C' 0 a. C L 5- 0 w .0 :6 CC > 16 6) •-- U) -- X c.. CO ...., 40 C 6. )- t- > L, UJ - 2 c 4' -. •.- >. 0. 0 Li) 0 .3 a' ›. 9 1 — .-- 1- a -c c- „ cr) 1.1..4 > --- Z.5 0 0 - 0 X 1.0 -5 -' 4.1 CC 0 CC .4 CC X 0- X -.J NG X O. 1,- u.i .4 CC a_ C.- 0 — .-. ..- . CO 01, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 —27- - N W S 6 U 2 O O O O O O /�ypp O O O LL. P O O M O M W N 4.1O O O CCO O P O z O 0 CO N VU M cc m ► O 7 N O L z .r C O U ._ N 2 O W m WO O O Y O O O p M O O O O W P o ca O </1P M N O N N N O.CC O CC a a _2 pN P Q I _ y a. W C Q 8 V L L ' U C y QJ y y N N V O d N 6) o rn C C m m 61 67 N 0/ 0 O O p • C CSD 2 O L Y Y A O C7 L Y L L C C T W • 01 CO L 0 C O O V/ 0 a CO a a 0 p O. Q) T ' WC O O O O O o r-- O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O o 0 o u, CO C r O •O M M M N ' N O W N N W V1 IA UJ CD ~ w N T Ov L _ 4- v M OL cn it u L H - L L L .0 a c :- u u Y u u L LII L O1 O N C O U I.1.1 0. s O Cl. Z W O C t- J •J c; 4 C a a 1n d_ n CO O• O a O a O a a CI p L . .. ... ... •........ . 14.-. y . . Z L g 2 o O O //�� N {.L. g N 0r N M OO O M O /LCL N O LL g c0= . O N '^ I- <.../ M vJ U O O O I- I- O O O '` O Z N _ O N O Li U r W W W 2 0 O[ W ` III W O O O O O O O O O W Q N O CO. O V, cc��r .r IA O IAM a aCC /� CL CL O 0 2 N O+ co P co .1-- N M J - I-- � N CL W OG I Q 8 U Nan C U C C C Z O O O C w a+ •-- C.0 1-...- C C C C C C u. O o O CD C C O C) T o 0 0 0 W ' r• O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N O O WI ..) N M M M P W v 0) ~ w enO T U N c_ C O O N _ ..... N L. O a C v LC Ca. u Q 1 co X C •- N '�7. W d O r- Y Y —, f- U U Y O L C L CO cel W N L CO C O C W C Q_ (/) O. —• N O c al t N L m Vf c y N C al C .0 Y U C O a U O C N W O L C t O 4 Y "l L C O C O d c O ...1 W r U I.- U- 4 5 O. O. c-- N M J N N N C C C Cl -2 9- • .. . . • _ co 1- z Li 6 _.._ 2 < ...„, cc & CD 0 Ct ..„, • • . . 0 . .. CI) - C-3 = ce t- — Z cn z ...r • LLI u . . . . • ..... 2 . . . . • . . & . If, 0 crs 0 co 0 •••• 44 44 t ' CCcz a Cl.. cp o o ca 2 CV 0 . 0 Os C) 0 •—• r,./ CV 401 401 ....1 ..... I•IIII CA t 1 Ce > O > 0 < 8 cn t... E 0 . (0 = C") CO — T Li 0 0 0 I I- 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 X • ... . C\I ._ In 0 tn 0 0 . . . • - CD cn I.1.1 NI t.1 SA Ni 114 ' CO VI /.... CO., /... 0 T U U w 0 0 e4 C :11 O. .-- C 11 - c7 Z - > (.1 Z 0 - 43 - - 7 C. - 0 1— CO al 0 CC --, — — .... —. cn = ce m _le .... = .4 m L3 = C c. o m •-- in 0 0 --1 0 ...J U..1 ...I < CA .., .... C.) a. c.) C 0- 7 .... ,— U > •-• cn •—• -X U la ' •-• — 7 'a 2 = 0 2 CC CL. C1. M 1 X cc x a. ti., us w -30- N r- 2 Lu x6 U 2 Q dP CC V 0 O O O O CCM O O Le, • O LL ^ O O = N N O_ _ I w M N H ZH ' W • P 2 C W a i > 0 M O w P O c.CC O c /� n. CL p 2 J T Q H y W Cm U L . C U 0 = ° 0 cfl 5 rn T O O O O N s o O )- O O 0)C\11 � : N N V/ W •- /� M M vJ O T-' v z O _ N J V- O It G ac c " U U C W W U ... VI O 0 C L.N N W H U N N C W LL CO L W C '� O U u- W C a u. -3 1- ti • • cc 0 cc O r- N W• c O ce W W pM. MO O P C PN � P N a 8 U co j CT) T N /T ~ 0 rr1 -3 2- i i I: t i i i I' 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Shakopee Bypass (T.H. 101) 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: Southerly Bypass I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1994 0 F II Cost Estimate: $30 , 000 . 00 (Construction Costs) N D Source of Funding: State of Minnesota I N Impact on City Budget: None G M I Problem(s) : Mn/DOT currently only has 22 million S available. May construct temporary intersections C rather than interchanges. E L L A Recommendation(s) : Mn/DOT has already programmed in Phase I N construction. for bidding. Continue to lobby E for getting remainder of funds . 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: The City has committed $1, 000, 000 towards the project. Already $750 , 000 of the City' s $1, 000, 000 has been spent on the design of the bypass. Al 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P — R PROJECT: T.H. 169 Bridge and Mini Bypass 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: Downtown I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 0 F II Cost Estimate: $10, 000, 000 N D Source of Funding: $1, 900, 000 - Tax Increment Financing I $8, 100, 000 - State Federal N Impact on City Budget: None. Money available from existing G T. I.F. Districts. M I Problem (s) : Existing bridge is deficient in capacity s 1st Ave. congested with vehicles and trucks. C E L L A Recommendation(s) : Mn/DOT proposing to bid in Nov. 1991 N Design completed. E — 0 II S — OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A2 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P ' R PROJECT: County Road 18 Bridge (Bloomington Ferry) 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Engineering — C T Location of Project: C.R. 18 and Hwy 101 I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1996 - 1998 0 F II Cost Estimate: $110, 000. 00 _ N D Source of Funding: County/State/Federal I N G Impact on City Budget: None (County Project) — M I Problem(s) : Existing bridge deficient. S C E L L A Recommendation(s) : N E _ O U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A3 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program •P R PROJECT: Muhlenhardt Road 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Public Works C T Location of Project: C.R. 16 to C.R. 18 I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1992 0 F II Cost Estimate: $150, 000 N D Source of Funding: Special Assessments I (See Comments Below) N G Impact on City Budget: Tax levy will be needed to pay any bonds not covered by the Special Assessments. M I Problem(s) : This currently is a gravel road with extremely high S maintenance costs due to severe slope and inadequate C drainage facilities. E L L A Recommendation (s) : Regrade, pave, install ditches, culverts N or other storm sewer facilities . E 0 II S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Due to large parcels fronting on this road, Special Assessments may need to be supplemented by other funding. A4 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Minnesota/Dakota Streets 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Public Works _ C T Location of Project: 7th Ave. North to Alley I Including Alley from Market to Dakota N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 0 F II Cost Estimate: $40, 000 N D Source of Funding: Assessment I N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : Gravel streets and alley. Extremely high maintenance S costs. Drainage problems. C E L L A Recommendation(s) : Pave and install storm sewers. N E 0 II S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A5 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Vierling Drive 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: C.R. 17 to C.R. 79 — I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1992 0 F ' II Cost Estimate: $700, 000 N D Source of Funding: State Aid - 100% Z Assess 36/50 or $500, 000 N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : New street. Needed for development. S — C E L L — A Recommendation (s) : Will need to be constructed in the next year N cr two due to.. continual development of this E area. 0 II S — OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A6 — 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Annual Sidewalk Repair Program 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Engineering — C T Location of Project: City Wide I N F Proposed Year of Completion: Annually O F U Cost Estimate: $25, 000 per year — N D Source of Funding: $12 , 500 - Assessed I $12 , 500 - G.O. Bonds N G Impact on City Budget: Minimal — M I Problem(s) : Sidewalk repairs needed to reduce insurance liability. g Should be an annual program. — C E L L A [ Recommendation(s) : Recommend allocating $25 , 000 per year for this N program. E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: — A7 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Apgar Street 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: 1st Avenue to 6th Avenue I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1992 0 F II Cost Estimate: $345, 000 N D Source of Funding: State Aid will pay for this project 100% . I 25% will still be assessed. N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : Complete street deterioration _ S C E L L A Recommendation (s) : Complete street reconstruction N _ E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: _ Council has periodically tried to close the railroad crossing on Apgar Street and encourage Scott Street to be used. May want to _ delay any construction on this 1-block area until that decision is final . A8 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: 8th Avenue 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: Atwood to Spencer I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 0 — - F II Cost Estimate: $345 , 000 _ N D Source of Funding: Sewer Fund - $32, 000 SPDC - $20, 000 I Assess = $75, 000 G.O. Bonds = $218 , 000 N G Impact on City Budget: Tax levy will need to be increased to pay off bond. M I Problem(s) : Sever payment deterioration. May be a base problem. S Storm sewer needed. C E L L A Recommendation(s) : Complete street reconstruction needed. N E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: _ A9 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P — R PROJECT: Apgar Street 10th Avenue south to terminus 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: 10th Avenue south 1800 ' to terminus I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1992 — O F II Cost Estimate: $300, 000 N D Source of Funding: General Obligation bonds/Assessments I N G Impact on City Budget: Tax levy to pay bonds. M I Problem(s) : Existing Apgar Street south of 10th Avenue is a s gravel street. Fuller Street will curve into C.R. 77 C in this area to become the new collector street. E Apgar Street will be a local street. L L A Recommendation (s) : Construct local urban street in 1992 . N _ E 0 II S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Adjacent residents to Apgar Street have complained about dust from traffic on gravel surface for several years. Al0 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P _ R PROJECT: Naumkeag Street O J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: 1st Ave. to 4th Ave. — I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 0 F II Cost Estimate: $150, 000 N D Source of Funding: 25% Special Assessment - $38, 000 I Sewer Fund - $45, 000 _ N G.O. Bonds - $67, 000 G Impact on City Budget: Tax levy to pay bonds. — M I Problem(s) : Severely deteriorated - pavement, inadequate S curb & gutter, severe grade problems at railroad c crossing. E L _ L A Recommendation(s) : Complete street reconstructions. N E 0 II S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: All 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Harrison Street 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: 6th Ave. to 3rd Ave. I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1992 O F II Cost Estimate: $140, 000 N D Source of Funding: 25% Assessed - $35 , 000 I 75% G.O. Bonds - $105, 000 — N G Impact on City Budget: Will need to pay off bond with tax levy. M I Problem(s) : Severely deteriorated pavement (concrete) . S C E L _ L A Recommendation(s) : Remove concrete pavement and gravel base N and replace -with bituminous pavement. E — 0 II S — OTHER PERTINENT INFOR' ATION ON THE PROJECT: Al2 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Maras Street (private road) 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: From 13th Ave. south I ! N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1992 O F II Cost Estimate: $180, 000 N D Source of Funding: Special Assessment I N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : Existing road is gravel and extremely substandard. S Drainage problems. Severe hump over gas line. C Heavy truck use. E L L A Recommendation(s) : Construct to current City standards for N industrial roads, 44 ' wide, with adequate E drainage facilities. O _ II S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Currently a private road, but is in the process of being dedicated to the City. A13 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program p R PROJECT: Viking Steel Road 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: 4th Ave. to T.H. 101 I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 0 F II Cost Estimate: $100, 000 N D Source of Funding: Special Assessments I N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : Substandard gravel road. Addition _ S right-of-way needed. C E L L A Recommendation (s) : Widen and pave. N _ E 0 II S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: _ Al4 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Spencer Street 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: 4th Ave. to 9th Ave. and I 1st Ave. to 3rd Ave. N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1992 O F II Cost Estimate: $300, 000 N D Source of Funding: 25% Special Assessment - $75, 000 I Sewer Fund - $60, 000 N G.O. Bonds - $165, 000 G Impact on City Budget: Tax levy to pay off bonds . M I Problem(s) : Severely deteriorated pavement. S C E L — L A Recommendation(s) : Total street reconstructions. N _ E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Al5 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Vierling Drive 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: C.R. 15 west to Harrison I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1994 O F II Cost Estimate: $350, 000 N D Source of Funding: 100% State Aid. 36/50 will be assessed I ($250, 000) N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : New street needed for development. S C E L L A Recommendation(s) : Construct as needed for development. N E — 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: — Al6 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Vierling Drive 0 J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: C.R. 79 to C.R. 77 I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1995 0 F II Cost Estimate: $500, 000 N D Source of Funding: State Aid will pay 100%. City will still I assess 36/50 or $360, 000 . N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : New street needed for development. S — C E L _ L A Recommendation (s) : Construct as needed for development. N E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A17 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Downtown Alleys - Spencer to Fuller 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: Spencer St. to Fuller St. I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1992 0 F _ II Cost Estimate: $80, 000 N D Source of Funding: General Obligation Bonds I Assessments N G Impact on City Budget: Tax levy to pay bonds. M I Problem(s) : Alleys are severely deteriorated in downtown alley. S C E L L A Recommendation(s) : Coordination installation of underground N electric lines with reconstruction of alleys. — E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A18 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Vierling Drive 0 J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: C.R. 77 to C.R. 15 I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1996 O F r II Cost Estimate: $475, 000 N D Source of Funding: State Aid will pay 100%. City will still I assess 36/50 or $340, 000 . N G Impact on City Budget: None — r I Problem(s) : New street needed for development. _ S C E L L A Recommendation (s) : Construct as needed for development. N E 0 II S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A19 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Phase II - Downtown Streetscape 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: 1st Avenue, Fuller to Sommerville I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1994 • 0 F U Cost Estimate: $900, 000 N D Source of Funding: Tax Increment Financing = $800, 000 — I Special Assessment = $100, 000 N G Impact on City Budget: Unknown M I Problem(s) : Traffic Congestion and deteriorating infrastructure. S Complete street reconstruction needed. C E L w L A I Recommendation (s) : Construct after bridge and mini bypass built. N E 0 U _ S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Includes street reconstruction, sewer, water, streetscape items and street lighting. — A20 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P r R PROJECT: Sommerville Street 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: 4th Avenue to 9th Avenue I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 O — r F r U Cost Estimate: $530, 000 — N D Source of Funding: Sewer Fund - $92, 000 SPUC - $69 , 000 I Assess (25%) = $92 , 000 G.O. Bonds = $277 , 000 N G Impact on City Budget: Will need to increase tax levy to pay off bonds. M I Problem(s) : Complete pavement deterioration. The, 900 block S extremely bad. C E L L A t Recommendation (s) : Complete street reconstruction needed. The N 900 block could be done in conjunction with E another project (i.e. Lewis Street) . — O U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A21 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Market Street 0 J _ E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: 4th Avenue to 10th Avenue I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1995 0 II Cost Estimate: $500, 000 N D Source of Funding: State Aid will pay 100%. 25% will then be _ I assessed. Also a Federal Aid Urban Street. N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : No curb and gutter on portions and deteriorating S pavement. C E L — L A Recommendation(s) : Complete street reconstruction to urban N section. Wait until comprehensive plan — E update is completed to determine if O collector street status is needed. U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: — A22 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: 4th Avenue Sidewalk 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Engineering C T _ I Location of Project: Fillmore to C.R. 17 N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1994 0 F _ II Cost Estimate: $100 , 000 N D Source of Funding: Special Assessments - 100% I N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : Complete pedestrian route along 4th Avenue and tie _ S it into Marschall Road. 4th Avenue west of Fillmore C Street has sidewalk. E L L A Recommendation (s) : Construct sidewalks on both sides of street. N E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A23 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program I P R PROJECT: Bluff Avenue 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: Naumkeag to Dakota (Includes Minnesota and I Prairie Street 1st to Bluff. N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1994 0 F U Cost Estimate: $150, 000 N D Source of Funding: Assess I N G Impact on City Budget: None M 1 I Problem(s) : Gravel Streets S C E L L A Recommendation (s) : Upgrade to City Standards. N E O U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Refer to Gravel Roads Feasibility dated 1/29/90 which was adopted by Council Resolution. _ A24 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Fuller Street - 6th Avenue to 10th Avenue 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: 6th Ave. to 10th Ave. I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 0 F II Cost Estimate: $200 , 000 N D Source of Funding: General Obligation Bonds I Assessments ' N G Impact on City Budget: Tax levy to pay bonds . M I Problem(s) : Fuller Street is classified as a collector street and S is a part of the dual collector system in the downtown C area. The pavement is deteriorated. E L L A Recommendation (s) : Reconstruct prior to completion of the mini N bypass project. E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A25 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P i R PROJECT: Scott Street 0 J — E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: 7th Ave. to 10th Ave. I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 O F _ II Cost Estimate: $200, 000 N D Source of Funding: 25% Assessment - $50, 000 I Sewer Fund - $40, 000 N G.O. Bonds - $110, 00- G Impact on City Budget: Will need to increase tax levy to pay off bonds. — M I Problem(s) : Pavement deteriorating and infrastructure problems. S C E L L A Recommendation(s) : Total street ,reconstruction. N — E 0 II _ S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: — A26 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program ,^ P R PROJECT: 7th Avenue 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Engineering C T I Location of Project: Spencer to Fuller N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 O F II Cost Estimate: $200, 000 N D Source of Funding: 25% Special Assessment - $50, 000 I Sanitary Sewer Fund - $40 , 000 N G.O. Bonds - $110, 000 G Impact on City Budget: Tax levy to pay off bonds. M I Problem (s) : Severely deteriorated pavement, no curb & gutter S or deteriorated curb & gutter. No sewer, dips at C intersections. E L L A Recommendation(s) : Total street _reconstruction. N E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A27 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P — R PROJECT: 5th Avenue 0 J — E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: Spencer to Fuller I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1996 O F II Cost Estimate: $200, 000 N D Source of Funding: 25% Special Assessment - $50, 000 — I Sewer Fund - $40, 000 N G.O. Bonds - $110, 000 G Impact on City Budget: Tax levy to pay off bonds. M I Problem(s) : Deteriorated pavement, inadequate curb & gutter. — S C E L _ L A Recommendation (s) : Total street reconstruction. N E O II _ S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A28 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Marschall Road Sidewalk 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: From C.R. 16 to 10th Avenue — I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1995 — O F r _ II Cost Estimate: $50, 000 N D Source of Funding: Special Assessments - 100% I N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : Need to complete pedestrian routes on Marschall Road _ S and to fill in "gap" in sidewalk system. Heavy C pedestrian movement on this street. E L L A Recommendation (s) : Construct sidewalk. N E 0 II S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A29 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: McKenna Road 0 J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: C.R. 16 to South Corporate Limits I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1995 0 F _ U Cost Estimate: $300, 000 N D Source of Funding: Special Assessments (See Comments Below) I — N G Impact on City Budget: Tax levy will be needed to pay any bonds not covered by the special assessments. — M I Problem(s) : Gravel road. S C E L L A Recommendation (s) : Upgrade by paving. N E — 0 U S — OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Due to large parcels abutting this road, special assessments may need to be supplemented by other funding. A30 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Pierce Street 0 J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: 4th Ave. to 3rd Ave. -- I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1995 O F r — II Cost Estimate: $50, 000 N D Source of Funding: Special Assessments I N G Impact on City Budget: None _ r M I Problem(s) : Severe grade problem on this street. Poor S pavement, narrow, no curb & gutter or storm sewer. C E L L A Recommendation(s) : Complete street reconstruction. N — E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Due to severe grade, the necessity of this street should be evaluated and possibly considered for vacating. A31 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Brook Lane 0 J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: Engineering C T -- Location of Project: Shumway to Clay I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1995 O F — II Cost Estimate: $90, 000 N D Source of Funding: Special Assessments. — I N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : Gravel Streets. — S C E L Y L A Recommendation (s) : Upgrade to City Standards. N — E O U — S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Inadequate right-of-way. Additional needed. Refer to Gravel Roads Report dated 1/90 adopted by City Council by Resolution. -- A32 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Road just east of Maras Street (private) 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: From Vierling Drive south for 600 ' I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1995 0 � 1 F _ II Cost Estimate: $66 , 000 N D Source of Funding: 100% special assessment I N G Impact on City Budget: None — r M I Problem(s) : Current street is gravel and substandard. S No curb/gutter or storm. = C E L — L A Recommendation (s) : Construct to .standard City specifications, N 36 ' wide rural section with drainage ditches. _ E 0 II S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Currently a private road, but soon to be City. A33 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: 2nd Avenue 0 J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: Engineering C T a Location of Project: Pierce to Apgar I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1995 O F II Cost Estimate: 150, 000 N D Source of Funding: Special Assessments I N G Impact on City Budget: None H I Problem(s) : Gravel Streets — S C E L L A Recommendation(s) : Upgrade to City Standards. N E O U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Includes Pierce St. , 3rd Ave. to 2nd Ave. and Webster St. , 6th Ave. to 5th Ave. Refer to Gravel Roads Report dated 1/90 adopted by City Council by Resolution. A34 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: 6th Avenue 0 J - E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: Holmes to Lewis I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1995 O F - II Cost Estimate: $60 , 000 N D Source of Funding: Special Assessments - $15, 000 I Shakopee Public Utilities - $10, 000 N Sewer Fund - $10, 000 G G.O. Bonds - $25, 000 Impact on City Budget: Minimum M I Problem(s) : No sewer or water. Inadequate pavement and curb & = S gutter. C E L L A Recommendation (s) : Total street--reconstruction. N - E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A35 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: 3rd Avenue 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Engineering C T — Location of Project: West of Harrison (169 Frontage) I N — F Proposed Year of Completion: 1996 O F II Cost Estimate: $334, 000 N D Source of Funding: Assess = $184 , 000 I G.O. Bonds = $150, 000 N G Impact on City Budget: Will need to increase tax levy to pay for G.O. Bonds. M I Problem(s) : Sewer and water needed for development. Storm S drainage problems. Rural street section. C E — L L A Recommendation (s) : Construct sewer, water, storm and urban street _ N section with curb and gutter. E 0 II — S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A36 ' I — 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program � I P R PROJECT: Gorman Street 0 J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: From 4th Avenue to C.R. 16 I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1996 O r F r II Cost Estimate: $300, 000 N D Source of Funding: Street 25% Assessed. ($50, 000) I Curb & Gutter/Watermain 100% Assessed. ($80, 000) N Total Assessed = $130, 000 Remainder G.O. Bonds G Impact on City Budget: Unknown — r � M I Problem(s) : Street is deficient in section (rural). and needs S utilities. C E L — L A Recommendation (s) : Includes street reconstruction to urban section N curb & gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer and E watermain. 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A37 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: 4th Avenue 0 J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: C.R. 17 to Shenandoah I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1996 0 F II Cost Estimate: $1, 100, 000 N D Source of Funding: State Aid will pay 100% of the street. — I Utilities will be 100% assessed. N G Impact on City Budget: None 1 H I Problem(s) : Rural street section with no utilities. — S C E _ L L A Recommendation (s) : Reconstruct to urban section, including any N utilities (sewer and water) . E 0 U _ S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A38 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P T R PROJECT: Fillmore Street, 2nd Ave. to 4th Ave. 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Engineering C T I Location of Project: 2nd Ave. to 4th Ave. N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 0 F II Cost Estimate: $100, 000 N D Source of Funding: G.O. Bonds I Assessment N G Impact on City Budget: Tax levy to pay bonds. M I Problem(s) : The pavement is deteriorated. S C E L L A Recommendation(s) : N E 0 II S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: A39 3 ^.L �' -. - • s.i..V-{ -....,_:e4,':;,..::-!,11. �-' maya• c:? ..,••, Mr"V's` 1\`3 h`. 1 --a.� --,,,,,c4,--,`^/.`_ -,-••.:•1•. x- Z ii -•.� s. C••..f,A r fi; -T y. Y� •-•,,,,,,-„, - ':cam -.�•C nr2 )Y - 41 ' may"3••1 } `fc'^ --'=2• -:"....„1,........- S W3 a � f • �` c .: - 'K�1. c'Sa ��; aaE 3"e _ s4. ii'_-'- t rk5�� E.;• < '?.: • C°•:.':.. 3c•_ -a?x C k..-'Y.-:.',.:9.;„_4"': +'•s-2 n.3 ' stc?r,_ r` ,,- ~ _ • • 3. tY5: ,- e • ' ea�s.d4 -%SfY t30;:tc •'-1c Ts: ;• : KTi-yc ' ?- 4- '[��''... lti' i y -...f,'-'.. ..". " r 12Ler' t fi i - ' _' a Ke'''-,..''...,..........::-;'-_,-......-f..-..."1.-j" mo. - I�. S ..Q, _: am4;i7....".T.'..''.';;;.:-...). , y Sxs .' .- M c,� .; 1Vy ' - -,::`,,- .-.-._4_ + .-11:-•""; j> ' -S. c .� . F c It L w 'C _ :...,.....„..,....,:. • ir, , i., ; r ' - � H 'f ' 1i. y = ' fin- " -� , � --g4;.,..,0,:-,..- --,., „."' 1a �-;;L } { t1 , ---. ~ ,._, � •- , •_,."1.:.`.',4,4: -, e,�- Fji % � Z �, - ' i >. A{� i•c- -'3Zl O y.L j.: <r F -.[ Y �" .. <y ,':^1.-,.'-.4...,-.'..:---,-e•;,.. he _ � +� ��� � � �3 "S• � # * �t1 - t' t � ; _ ��; � � a ...,,.i....;,',..2.4 } f 3. rs, • 'l }� � �' �� a� . rt � � -V. .fi � •,: t r-.- Y'" ' . / 36`s is 'e`3''--Y - ' tit 1' ,.. .?-t s4 .rf r ., . _a :` hi Ya ..` b > ` • c z t a'itF - e, ' -'e-',-,-:..,,,-.: .- 7o- __.' '` r,'1 ' 1-,t - .e � ,ySt ..-"-L.'''' •,,ct.ss • �- L, >- '+ a- '7 � � 1- T '��c k -------_-4-_ ,,c-•••---•,--:,.----"---. 4 T ` .f - �,.y`• ..F a: r E - 4. _- jç i, , }; --3 x � s H+ Tom.'c.2j t , :-.. v `i � I - i - ? �• ' 4AY � rkua. °+ r .�" ,sr', �i'v '� -t' �z.�r �c' ""> � !---.V.}a-sxF �� j . !l-- -;t14o41i � iy _ SI._ jS ' � ' 1? cf . AC lC r 3�. yycNTgY�r } t 3„ ,4''r >•, ram,t '}L ` s� t# •t 1 ,a° - - rR P F ---- { _ - f es' '- a . ,-.:4.,..:-.,-,-_-- `v )r , ; Y' ++ +i, r t,Yl” : aY i` t ,5 �t> v,, ,. , --• sAr" • 't t 5� .yam ;� � j._'.P --4..„.„4,-.-_,F:„:„....- ...i — -" �E£ 1 F- ..' - '--•,�" Z z - ..i - r ?) 3-c a�, 2 4S,._ _ ,I. -�� ar t,. /, -i -'`' S _ JF Tdt.,; .�.¢. �� , -�lY sr. '+"' =t'^c.. -7 - -'4''-',7:•'''--*'''ay • 'i t _,k = --*4-3.:,,,;4.3.:3-:.3t::::"... mak. ":"-TF,. �.-S �j 71'.-": c_' FZ:.' t � ti `=s- +s 1. - ft. :it '{'y > r ; s'�.4 - `t i --_,._`-;.'1A'} .tw-u l.,c ,,,...;:f-,__,..,,,, t �•F' ,'St, ;i ?c s --,-.,•-...„7.;,-...:4„.,.•-.....„-_,-_-,1::;3-3... s s G E,. �`- .'u �,.'-+,ice ,- -ty -` ' -A,V,;.-,-.-::-,•-• ...j -1 i-z'`_�f ; ' ; V- 31-;:s.;.;,....:;;,._;•: Y '':::•.`--- t . ; M Ley -3 1 f• ''�^s,F ::----1T4 `• w ;,. Y7 ¢ ',.�:2-i.i>- - • • ¢� y` -4 Sw,,±:,--::.;;Z:•-•:. _ nkb-P,. -1 .s... Y• r ,.„:%,....-"•-.-,i4,-,-..,."---,,, ,.---.--,,?'"> �' - - v. 3-,. ` ' 2 -«- '�' • �- - ^ � t rpt, '�1,- ��kf�S .� '4'7:7- '. 1 1". -r '-'4.-44t-'-..,. t_`'4 ..,-. r 1 `j ;_e;.„.::'-',...."...`.,:� e}C --i......,,7.:.- -- . ` -� �'i ".sc tmay. .% p: zs.._ -'* ' f .'- }� f. 1 s>.+a.r �? - „ti.a;• aS'k'.¢ _,....„?....--7.' --s•-'4'.-'7--,'"';',-... s.. -- ,," fig Y c� c� -- $ -r�r�s v_� : - w,,,:-4•----;:;.•,- ise� ''.' ..: :sr�y.-T'��h - v'.' 110, -1$ Y, --,-,;;;;•-•---f.:1-. ,.'•i.-,,''---.....=';. - . £-.'" G: •,-- 1,l.t}".i+'1 y s`1 ..> t`'C . ". ✓ �_, 'k=-it s S -tti y ! r ->=i N 1. S )• "L E �'.3 Y" -i '-'..4-.4-. 2,_,. -may--- .. ,,- �.t :N'i '_ 4,--..._•.,-. Y *c��, ,< r,-•G .c, , ? ) -- ° � C t Y� a. tiA x 4. 1,,. ". rr' I Act t-_ n��,x - a � r:,-,--:-.. _.,,,.,,,,,,,,-,,,-.--.0Y'� A...". r` -yc '_5- '�'..*.s- €�"� `'k- -- --:',1.!-..::-1 -4-:-::,--,-.:,--:.f isc•- 'moi " e a+i-�w .ts a.#rt ti"s �� � _ .b �✓ �: :r -e-L'y -t ".., �r-t. r - ..a- i ,.---„,,---;,;:14--. 4-i;,..:' . ♦ _' _ ��' R'ir ♦ �S"1,T -... .'°� s,. g • 1 G f:-^S `� • "s'i^ t r'-C" e-a.—,is f.`mit' N'rE+'.¢E ; ,'‘i;•:-...'4-''' a l �r i _ tib' . -.0-..-:..‘-..-1.'12.,:.- 1:: sii,� �N 1 / t: _t... 3g'Y c -;;�.y ?'`-,,-..it r,. 1 F x 7 Y - :-:,2-,,,..•..;-; y, F 5. r,S R._ f ''''',--1.--1!"..'.',45f,‘::' . -r1g3 r `2L a` '''i. Fir"- k� y - '^`[°a•► `-fit s a .-!..-33. f M ,., E ^r1' , �--. �,Y 4 "-_-_-.--,;.--(4:,..---.. - - a 3.3 L.,r_ 745+ c".. y,••x tib.+`- 4 z" , Y : 33:'-:''' K;h=@`4 , .4i ,,-- ' 'Y.-ic3. 3r 1, -.''...2--- - -t *}xk� '1.� ,�' ` rns `; s✓ ti "2 y„J,�6 - .�r .}�4s. s-: ;• je � L`y •,S,::-...-.:�_ 're 7.,"1.-2...`•;-..q T ,- 1-4,--..,..-' - -. 'S5 ` L �.:11 v T".- '.' .Ss3 ? .,S' .;.-,...-:!.-.4-;,4- F'... :z 7x �L,r' `e... ti 'K._' ,c ii •...42..-..,„„R.-4....---fii1 E v s i, s r=. 34",---.3-,---e-ice�a s Y y-ra.c - .. ,t ig _ : -' Y�t•* -'t.s_�^ c"_ v `' �`�1 .M .`� -.tf'1,} 4 t �3'v KS� • F ��.-2.;.. .s.,..,-.2'.,,i;t - > t,+ ; t Y � L,WiZ�",� 4 YY.N.,, -4. .t " rY Y+ •�Z1. r�+a\ -.s 'SR 4-£�fi - l'b � ?b .?� k�. :-...7-74.=1---.,.:.-7_,..'.-...--,---:-.: ,, J s yL :-#!%` ..5 ' '', ,.mac u'%^'`. �; ;,. 3 1 . s:-� -,ii.... �' C ---- - _ - 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Phase III & IV of Upper Valley Drainage Project O Phase III - Trunk System from Meadows Subd. to Tahpah J Phase IV - 6 North South Lines from Bypass E C Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Engineering T Location of Project: Along Bypass — I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1992 0 F U Cost Estimate: $3 , 100, 000 N D Source of Funding: MN/DOT - $1, 100, 000 I T. I .F. (City) - $2 , 000, 000 N G Impact on City Budget: None. Existing T. I. F. Districts M I Problem(s) : Needed for development and for construction S of bypass. — C E L L A Recommendation(s) : MN/DOT to construct with bypass. N E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Cl 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program 1 P R PROJECT: Dean' s Lake Drainage Improvements 0 J — E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1994 0 F II Cost Estimate: $800, 000 N D Source of Funding: Storm Sewer Utility Fund and Special I Benefit Assessment N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : Severe drainage problem near C.R. 83 and C.R. 16 S No outlet for drainage. C E L L A Recommendation (s) : Construct 101 Bypass to eliminate part of the N problem. City currently doing study to — E correct problem. Ponding to be implemented as O development occurs in this area. II s — OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: C2 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program J^ P R PROJECT: West Side Storm Laterals O J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: See attached Map — I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 O F i II Cost Estimate: $290, 000 N D Source of Funding: Storm Sewer Utility Fund and Special I Benefit Assessment. N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : Drainage Problems. No storm sewers in most of this S area. — C E L L A Recommendation(s) : Construct storm sewers where needed. N E O U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: C3 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Prairie Street Laterals 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: See Attached Map I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1995 0 F U Cost Estimate: $234 , 000 N D Source of Funding: Storm Sewer Utility Fund and Special I Benefit Assessment. N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : Additional Storm Sewers needed. s Y C E L L A Recommendation(s) : Construct storm sewers. N E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: C4 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Valley Park Drainage 0 J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: See Attached Map — I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1996 0 F II Cost Estimate: $450, 000 N D Source of Funding: Storm Sewer Utility Fund and Special I Benefit Assessment. N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : Drainage problems - no outlet. S C E L — L A Recommendation(s) : Construct storm sewers and detention ponds where needed. E 0 II S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: C5 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program t Y P R PROJECT: River Basin Drainage 0 J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: Engineering C T Location of Project: See Attached Map I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1995 O F II Cost Estimate: $450, 000 N D Source of Funding: Storm sewer utility fund and special benefit I assessment. N G Impact on City Budget: Minimal M I Problem(s) : Inadequate drainage facilities. S C E L L A Recommendation(s) : Construct storm sewer facilities. N E 0 U _ S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: C6 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Cretex Storm Drainage 0 J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: Engineering C T I Location of Project: See Attached Map N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1996 0 F _ II Cost Estimate: $120, 000 N D Source of Funding: Storm Sewer Utility Fund and Special I Benefit Assessment. N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : Connect surface water drainage problems. S C E L L A Recommendation(s) : Construct storm sewers where needed. N _ E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: C7 • I I 1 I I • I •„, I I I I 1 I I I I I L__ 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Lions Park Trail Extension 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Park & Rec. Adv. Board C T Location of Project: Southern section of Lions Park I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1992 0 F II Cost Estimate: $40, 000 N D Source of Funding: Donations - Lions Club I N G Impact on City Budget: None M Z Problem(s) : Is being coordinated with construction of southerly S bypass exit ramp and upper valley drainage planning C to avoid one project getting in way of the other. Has E caused a slight delay, but is a good project. L — L A Recommendation(s) : Construct trail loop which will complete the N trail system in this park. It will include a E pond with a bridge, plantings, and will connect O with the Upper Valley Trail . U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: This is being coordinated by City Engineer and is endorsed by Lions Club who are providing the local funds . D1 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Municipal Pool Repair O J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Park & Rec Adv. Board C T _ Location of Project: Lions Park I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1991 or 1992 0 F II Cost Estimate: $140, 000 N D Source of Funding: General Fund Balance/CIP/Park Reserve I N G Impact on City Budget: Big Capital Outlay at a time when funding sources are scarce. M I Problem(s) : After 24 years the main components that operate the s pool are wearing out. The pumps, the filtration C system, the liner and chlorination units need to be E fixed. The waterslide needs some repairing as well. L L A Recommendation(s) : Authorize staff to proceed with the repairs as N soon as possible. E 0 II S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: The outdoor pool is a facility that most everyone in the community supports. It ' s the only facility that the community constructed with a Bond Issue. D2 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Parking lot expansion and Tree and Shrubbery Program 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Jaycees C Park & Rec Adv Board T — I Location of Project: Tahpah Park N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1992 O F _ II Cost Estimate: $45, 000 N D Source of Funding: Jaycees (Donation) I — N G Impact on City Budget: Some staff time to draft specs. M I Problem(s) : S C E L L A Recommendation (s) : Proceed with plans to do the last phase (west N end) of the Tahpah Park parking lot. Planting E program allows Jaycees to move forward with O their beautification program for Tahpah Park. II S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Parking has been a chronic problem at this location. D3 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Lions Park Tennis Courts 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Park & Rec Adv Board C T s Location of Project: Lions Park I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1992 0 F U Cost Estimate: $35, 000 N D Source of Funding: Park Reserve Fund I N G Impact on City Budget: M I Problem(s) : Cracks began appearing on these courts several years S ago and they are worsening with each advancing year. C In some areas of the court, the cracks have widened as E much as 3 inches which causes erratic bounces to the L ball during play. L A Recommendation(s) : To reconstruct the tennis courts at Lions Park N E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: D4 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Stans Park Land Acquisition 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Task Force Study C T Location of Project: 30 acres south of High School - I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1992 0 F U Cost Estimate: $200, 000 — N D Source of Funding: Park Dedication/TIF/CIP I _ N G Impact on City Budget: Funding Concern M I Problem(s) : Land is under a 18 month moratorium. S C E L L A Recommendation (s) : Proceed with a study for land usage. N E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: The City' s Comprehensive Plan identified that this Park should be expanded by at lease 4 acres. Some residents feel that this location is ideal for a Community Center someday and recommend purchasing more acreage. D5 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program 1 P R PROJECT: O ' Dowd Lake Access/Dock 0 J E Departmental Priority: Donations/Park Reserve C T Location of Project: O'Dowd Lake I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 — 0 F II Cost Estimate: $15, 000 N D Source of Funding: Donations/Park Reserve I N G Impact on City Budget: Greater usage of that park and increase maintenance. M I Problem(s) : S C E L L A Recommendation(s) : To gradually enhance this park on a long N range basis. _ E 0 II S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: D6 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: New Neighborhood Park/Athletic Fields Land Purchase 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Park & Rec Adv Board C T Location of Project: South of bypass, east of Marschall Road — I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 0 F U Cost Estimate: $80, 000 Park Reserve N D Source of Funding: Bonds I — N G Impact on City Budget: Tax increase J M I Problem(s) : City Comprehensive Plan revision indicates a new S neighborhood park will be needed in this area of the C City with a further recommendation that the land be E purchased early before development occurs. Good L location also for needed athletic fields. L A Recommendation(s) : Plan for bonding for this purpose. N E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Plan for at least 30 acres. D7 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Riverview Park Parking Lot & Bleachers 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: George F. Muenchow C T Location of Project: Riverview Park I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1994 0 F II Cost Estimate: $10, 000 N D Source of Funding: Contribution/Park Reserve I N G Impact on City Budget: M I Problem(s) : Parking and seating would be nice feature for this S baseball field for Jr. H.S . age students. C E L — L A [ Recommendation (s) : Ascertain how much donated funding is available. N E 0 II S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Fencing and playing surface was part of 1989 program, making this a very nice first class field. These improvements would correlate with what has been done. D8 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Huber Park Development 0 J E 1 Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Park & Rec Adv Board C T Location of Project: Riverfront I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1996 0 F II Cost Estimate: $100, 000 N D Source of Funding: Grant/Park Reserve I N G Impact on City Budget: — M I Problem(s) : * Boat Landing (Lack of Parking) S * Access to park _ C * Flood Plain E * Fence along river for safety L L A Recommendation(s) : N E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: The boat launch ramp is an important facility. The usage of that facility is very high and it' s very essential for the City to do a study on whether it should be moved to a new location along the river _ bank or leave it at present site. A master plan for Huber Park is much needed. D9 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program i P R PROJECT: Memorial Park Play Apparatus 0 J E 1 Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Park & Rec Adv Board C T Location of Project: Memorial Park I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 0 F U Cost Estimate: $25, 000 N D Source of Funding: Donation I N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : Play apparatus by Shelter #2 would be nice. S Additional apparatus by Shelter #1 also would be C desirable. E L L A Recommendation (s) : Ascertain whether donated funds are possible. N E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: D10 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P _ R PROJECT: Memorial Park Parking Expansion & Lighting 0 J E 1 Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: George F. Muenchow - C T Location of Project: Memorial Park — I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1995 O J Cost Estimate: $40, 000 — N D Source of Funding: Park Reserve I N G Impact on City Budget: Funding Concern { — M I I Problem(s) : Additional parking space needed near comfort station. S Additional lighting needed for further security. — C E L _ L A Recommendation(s) : N E — O U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Dll 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Development of Killarney Park 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Park & Rec Adv Board C T Location of Project: Killarney Park I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1995 0 F ' II Cost Estimate: $20 , 000 N D Source of Funding: Park Reserve I N G Impact on City Budget: Staff time for design M I Problem(s) : Funding concern S C E L L A Recommendation(s) : N E y 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Includes ball field, skating rink and play equipment. D12 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Meritor Park Development 0 J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: Park & Rec Adv Board C T Location of Project: Meritor Park I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1996 0 F U Cost Estimate: $60, 000 — N D Source of Funding: Park Reserve I N G Impact on City Budget: Funding Concern M I Problem(s) : Funding Concern S — C E L L A Recommendation(s) : Prepare a master plan for this park. N Development of park. E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: D13 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Tahpah Park - Resurfacing of Parking Lot 0 J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: C T Location of Project: Tahpah Park I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1995 0 F U Cost Estimate: $10, 000 N D Source of Funding: Jaycees (donations) I s N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : S C E L L A Recommendation(s) : N E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: D14 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program 1 P R PROJECT: Community Recreation Center 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: C T Location of Project: South of High School I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1995-96 O F U Cost Estimate: 10 million N D Source of Funding: G. 0. Bonds/other I N G Impact on City Budget: — M I Problem(s) : Source of funding. Needs Assessment Survey should be S conducted to determine what the community center C ought to include. E L L A Recommendation(s) : Needs further study. N E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: D15 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program 1P R PROJECT: Eagle Creek Thrift Picnic Area/Shelter 0 J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: Park & Rec Adv Board C T Location of Project: Eagle Creek Thrift Shop Property I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1996 0 F II Cost Estimate: $60, 000 N D Source of Funding: Concern I N G Impact on City Budget: M I Problem(s) : Funding. Residents on that side of town have S complained that no park facilities exist at their C end of town. This triangular piece of land would be E well suited for picnicking. L L A Recommendation(s) : N E 0 II S — OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Restrooms could be attached to the Thrift Shop building. The City acquired the property when it annexed Eagle Creek Township. D16 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Family Picnic Shelters 0 J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: Park & Rec Adv Board C T Location of Project: O'Dowd Lake Park I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1996 0 F II Cost Estimate: $30, 000 N D Source of Funding: Park Reserve I N G Impact on City Budget: M I Problem(s) : O ' Dowd Lake Park is a small park that can only S accommodate small groups. Two small family sized C picnic shelters would be ideal at this location. E L L A Recommendation(s) : N E 0 II S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: D17 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Memorial Park Shelter #2 Electrical Service O Shelters #1 & 2 Water Service J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: George F. Muenchow C T Location of Project: Memorial Park I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1994 0 F II Cost Estimate: $25, 000 N D Source of Funding: Contribution/Park Reserve I N G Impact on City Budget: Funding Concern M I Problem(s) : Shelter #2 has never had electrical service. It now S appears that the State Health Department will be C closing the wells with hand pumps at shelters #1 & #2 E for health reasons. A safe water supply needs to be L provided. L A Recommendation(s) : Determine how much donated funding is available N and then proceed. — E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: People like to have electricity by their picnic shelters, also a water supply nearby. D18 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: O ' Dowd Lake Park Bituminous Trail - Road 0 J E Departmental Priority: Low Requested by: Park & Rec Adv Board C T Location of Project: O ' Dowd Lake Park I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1991 & 1993 0 F U Cost Estimate: Trail : $15, 000 (1991) , $15 , 000 (1996) N Road: $35, 000 (1993) D Source of Funding: Park Reserve I N G Impact on City Budget: Funding Concern M I Problem(s) : Funding Concern S C E L _ L A Recommendation(s) : To be constructed in stages as planned. N 1991. . .Segment on north shore connecting with E trail from Stonebrooke. 0 1995 . . . Segment on peninsula. U 1995 . . .Road and Parking S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: This plan was previously authorized by Council and submitted to the State Department of Planning which was required since this property was purchased with LAWCON FUNDS . D19 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Lighting Field #4 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Softball Assn. C T Location of Project: Tahpah Park I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 0 F U Cost Estimate: $28 , 000 N D Source of Funding: Donations - Softball Assn. - Rotary Club I N G Impact on City Budget: Lighting Cost M I Problem(s) : S C E L L A Recommendation(s) : N E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Two fields were lit in 1990 and a third field to be lighted when funds became available. This would complete the lighting project started in 1990 . D20 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program �^ P R PROJECT: Installation of Gas Grills 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Lions Club C T Location of Project: Lions Park I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 0 F U Cost Estimate: $10, 000 N D Source of Funding: Lions Club (Donation) I _ N G Impact on City Budget: Cost for gas M I Problem(s) : Safety concern. S — C E L L A Recommendation(s) : Further study needed. N E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: D21 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program R PROJECT: Frisbee Golf Course 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Park & Rec Adv Board C Lions Club T Location of Project: Lions Park I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 -- O U Cost Estimate: $15, 000 N D Source of Funding: Lions Club (Donation) I N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : S C E L L A Recommendation(s) : N _ E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Frisbee Golf Courses are becoming very popular nationwide. Users do not have to pay and game is played just like golf, only only that one uses a frisbee instead. D22 L1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program -J^ P R PROJECT: Concession Stand Expansion/Shelter "Wings" 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Park & Rec Adv Board C Jaycees T Location of Project: Tahpah Park I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 0 F _ II Cost Estimate: $25 , 000 N D Source of Funding: Jaycees (Donation) I N G Impact on City Budget: None I Problem (s) : S C E L L A Recommendation(s) : N _ E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Part of this expansion will include needed storage and room for a Tournament Headquarters. D23 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Football Bleachers 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Jaycees C T Location of Project: Tahpah Park I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1994 0 F I _ U Cost Estimate: $10, 000 N D Source of Funding: Jaycees (Donation) I N G Impact on City Budget: None M I Problem(s) : S C E L L A Recommendation (s) : N E 0 S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: This field can serve a dual purpose; for youth football and youth soccer. D24 1 i 1 1 1 i I f 1 1 E E f 1 I 1 1 i i 1 i i 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: New City Hall - Renovation 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Administration C T Location of Project: 129 South Holmes St. I N F Proposed Year of Completion: Mid-year 1992 0 F II Cost Estimate: $250, 000 N D Source of Funding: Capital Improvement Fund I N G Impact on City Budget: Minimal M I Problem(s) : Existing City Hall inadequate. S C E L _ L A Recommendation(s) : Renovate Marquette Bank building. N E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: El 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P ' R PROJECT: Public Works Building Parking Lot Repaving 0 J E Departmental Priority: Medium Requested by: Public Works C T Location of Project: Public Works Building - Gorman Street I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1993 0 F II Cost Estimate: $50, 000 N D Source of Funding: Capital Improvement Fund I a N G Impact on City Budget: Minimal M I Problem(s) : Paving surface deteriorated. Additional paving needed. S C E L L A Recommendation(s) : N • E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: E2 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program P R PROJECT: Building of Second Fire Station 0 J E Departmental Priority: High Requested by: Fire Dept. C T Location of Project: County Rd. 17 & Vierling Drive I N F Proposed Year of Completion: 1995 0 F U Cost Estimate: $1, 200, 000 N D Source of Funding: I N G Impact on City Budget: M I Problem(s) : S C E L — L A Recommendation (s) : N _ E 0 U S OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT: Would become Fire Dept. main Fire Station with Fire Department only needing two bays at present location. Fl 011•111 OMNI am. AMEN, Immo 1 .1/ Dunagin's People/ By Ralph Dunagin [Qt • 6 6 c .�s«.. V, [R+QkI. "We've been invited to a party in New York City . . . Bring your own infrastructure." MI. ki MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Appointment of LMC/AMM Voting Representative DATE: October 30, 1991 INTRODUCTION: On October 29, 1991 the Shakopee Committee of the Whole moved to recommend to City Council that Gloria Vierling be appointed to serve as the City of Shakopee' s League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) and Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) voting representative for their upcoming policy adoption meetings in November. BACKGROUND: If City Council concurs with the recommendation of the Committee of the Whole, it would be appropriate at this time to move that Gloria Vierling be appointed to serve as the City of Shakopee' s League of Minnesota Cities and Association of Metropolitan Municipalities voting representative for the policy adoption meetings to be held in November, 1991. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Move to appoint Gloria Vierling to serve as the City of Shakopee' s voting representative at the LMC meeting on November 21, 1991 and the AMM meeting on November 7 , 1991 . 2 . Appoint a different representative from City Council to serve as the City' s voting representative at the LMC and AMM policy adoption meetings held in November, 1991 . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1 . ACTION REQUESTED: Move to appoint Gloria Vierling to serve as the City of Shakopee' s voting representative at the League of Minnesota Cities policy adoption meeting on November 21, 1991 and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities policy adoption meeting on November 7 , 1991 . CONSENT 13 ,i' MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: MnDOT Parking Lot Lease DATE: October 28, 1991 INTRODUCTION: Earlier this month, staff reported that the vacation date for the city hall parking lot located North of First Avenue had once again been changed. This time to October 31, 1991. In order for the City to continue utilizing parking spaces within this particular lot, a lease agreement between the City of Shakopee and MnDOT is necessary. BACKGROUND: The vacation dates for the City owned property located north of First Avenue have changed several times during the last month. Originally, the vacation dates were set for November 30, 1991. However, after the first condemnation hearing the vacation date was changed to April 20, 1992 . Subsequent to this, the Judge reviewing the condemnation changed the vacation date for the parking lot located behind city hall back to October 31, 1991. The change in vacation date for the parking lot located North of City Hall has a direct impact on parking for City Hall employees and residents utilizing city services offered in City Hall. Therefore, in an attempt to accommodate both employees and residents, staff has requested MnDOT to draft a lease agreement for the continued use of a portion of the parking lot located North of City Hall. The portion would constitute approximately 2/5th's of the current lot or 28 stalls. Staff believes that this will adequately accommodate the parking needs for businesses located north of First Avenue. Attached is the lease agreement which provides the City of Shakopee with continued use of the aforementioned parking lot portion through April 20, 1992 . The leasing cost equates to $323 . 00 per month. The cost was based on 8% of the certified market value. If the City of Shakopee desires to utilize the parking lot beyond April 20, 1992 ; it will be necessary to negotiate a lease agreement with the project contractor next Spring. The City Attorney has reviewed the proposed lease agreement. MnDOT is changing two sections as noted on page 3 of the agreement per her request, and will have these to the City by November 6th. With those changes, the lease is acceptable. Staff would like to note that the monthly leasing cost was not budgeted in the 1991 budget. Therefore, a budget amendment will be presented at a later date in conjunction with other Administrative budget amendments that need to be made. The revenues generated from the sale of the parking lots will more than offset the leasing costs. ALTERNATIVES: i . Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the lease agreement with MnDOT for the continued use of Lot 6 - 7 , Block 4 , OSP excepting the Northerly 30 ' . 2 . Do not authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the proposed lease agreement between the City of Shakopee and MnDOT for the continued use of Lots 6 - 7 , Block 4 , OSP excepting the North 30 ' . 3 . Table action pending further information from staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #l . ACTION REQUESTED: Move to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the lease agreement with MnDOT for the continued use of Lot 6 - 7, Block 4 , OSP excepting the Northerly 30 ' . Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Right of Way and Surveys Room 511, Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 (612) 296-3226 S.P. 7009 (169=5) 902 *52-455 LEASE NO. PARCEL 3 H-5076 COMMERCIAL LEASE THIS LEASE, made the 21st day of October, at St. Paul, Minnesota, by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation ("landlord") , and the City of Shakopee ("tenant") . Mail lease to: Karen Marty, Shakopee City Attorney, 129 E. First Ave. , Shakopee, Minnesota, 55379. WITNESSETH In consideration of payment of the rent hereinafter specified to be paid by tenant, and the covenants and agreements herein contained, landlord hereby leases to tenant that certain property ("premises") in the County of Scott, State of Minnesota, the address of which is Jct. T.H. 169 and Levee Drive, Shakopee, Minnesota. Type of Property: Parking Lot Legal Description: Lots 6 and 7, of Block 4, Shakopee City, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Scott County, Minnesota; excepting therefrom the northerly 30 feet of said Lots 6 and 7 . including improvements, if any, for the term of 5 months and 20 days commencing on November 1, 1991, and ending on April 20, 1992, with the right of termination in both landlord and tenant as hereinafter set forth. I IT IS AGREED: 1. RENT. Tenant will pay to landlord as rent for the premises the sum of $1,830. 00, in monthly payments of $323 .00 in advance on the first day of each month during the term of this lease. Rent payments are to be mailed or delivered to landlord's finance office as follows: Department of Transportation Make checks payable to: Office of Financial Management Accounting Department Commissioner of Transportation 461 Rice Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55103 2 . PREPAID RENT. Tenant has paid to landlord the sum of $323. 00 as rent for November, 1991. 3 . USE OF PREMISES. Tenant will use the premises for the following purpose only: Parking. It will be the sole responsibility of tenant to comply with all laws, regulations, or ordinances imposed by any jurisdiction governing the use of the premises. Failure to comply will not relieve tenant of the obligation to pay rent. Tenant's use of the premises must not interfere with the public's use of any adjacent highway. 4 . MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS. Tenant will keep the premises in good condition at tenant' s own expense, and will not call on landlord to make any improvements or repairs. 5. CHARGES AND EXPENSES. Tenant will pay when due all utility charges and any other charges or expenses connected with tenant's use of the premises. 6. NOTICES. All notices herein provided to be given, or which may be given, by either party to the other, will be deemed to have been fully given when served personally on landlord or tenant, or when made in writing and deposited in the United States mail and addressed as follows: To tenant at the mailing address above stated and to landlord, Department of Transportation, at the State Transportation Building, Office of Right of Way, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55155. The address to which notices are mailed may be changed by written notice given by either party to the other. 7. CANCELLATION. T is lease will be subject to cancellation by either party at any time du ing the term hereof by giving the other party notice in writing at least days prior to the date when the cancellation will become effective. Furthermore, this lease will be subject to cancellation by landlord if the premises become needed for highway purposes (as determined solely by landlord) by giving tenant notice in writing at least 30 days prior to the date when the cancellation will become effective. In the event of cancellation any unearned rent paid by tenant will be returned. 8. INDEMNIFICATION AND RELEASE. Tenant will defend, indemnify, save harmless, and release landlord and landlord's employees from and against all claims, demands, and causes of action for injury to or death of persons or loss of or damage to property (including tenant and tenant's property) = - '--._ - - - - - - . - - - = connected with tenant's use and occupancy of the ♦ prdless-- - of-whether -Such- injU-y, deat -, 1 nsc., or . - + age--is caused-in/par-.,y- '- ce l- - - ' - deemed -to-. , the-r pori •rhi • • of 1 dler because of to • ._!_ y � - . -' o -• = enant • iving rise to 'ability( L any perr=,,n. 9. LIABILITY INSURANCE. Tenant will maintain during the full term of this lease a policy of public liability insurance with the following minimum limits of liability: Bodily Injury and Property Damage Combined $500, 000 Each Occurrence $500,000 Aggregate The insurance policy will include the coverage provided by one of the following policies, consistent with the risk involved: Comprehensive General Liability; Premises-Operations Liability; Owners' , Landlords' , and Tenants' Liability; Manufacturers' and Contractors' Liability. Prior to execution of this lease by landlord, the tenant will have a Certificate of Insurance sent to landlord as proof of coverage. The Certificate will name the State of Minnesota as Additional Insured and will designate the leased premises as the location covered by the policy. 10. FIRE INSURANCE. None Required. Tenant will make no claim against Landlord arising out of any loss to the premises. 3 11. RIGHT TO ENTER. Tenant will allow landlord and landlord's contractors and authorized licensees to enter upon the premises for any of the following purposes: to survey the land, to take soil borings, to perform utility relocation or repair work, or to perform any other work which is preparatory to a highway construction project; also to make emergency repairs required for highway safety. If there is a highway bridge above any part of the premises, tenant will allow landlord to enter upon the premises to inspect, maintain, and repair the bridge and its structural supports. If any of these operations substantially restrict the tenant's use of the premises, rent will be reduced proportional to the restricted use of the premises during the period of the restricted use. The reduction (or abatement) of rent will be tenant's only claim against landlord based on such restriction (or abatement) of use. Tenant will allow landlord to inspect the premises and to show the premises by appointment to prospective buyers or renters. Before entering the premises for any of the purposes under this paragraph 11, landlord will make a reasonable effort to notify tenant, provided, however, that in case of an emergency affecting highway safety (the existence of which will be determined solely by landlord) , if tenant is not present to permit entry onto the premises, landlord or its representatives may enter without notice to tenant, and for such entry landlord or its representatives will not be liable to tenant. 12 . ADJACENT HIGHWAY FACILITY. Tenant will not permit the storage of any substance or material on the premises which may create a fire hazard to the adjacent highway facility (including any overhead bridge and its structural supports) . If landlord determines that tenant is using the premises in such a way as to create a danger to the adjacent highway facility or the traveling public thereon, and if, upon receiving notice, tenant does not remedy the danger to the satisfaction of landlord, then landlord may immediately cancel this lease and take possession of the premises. Any requirement for giving notice of cancellation set out elsewhere in this lease will not apply to cancellation under this paragraph 12 . Unearned rent paid by tenant will be returned. 13 . ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Tenant will not assign this lease or sublet the premises, in whole or in part, without the written consent of landlord. 14 . CIVIL RIGHTS ACT. Tenant will not discriminate on the ground of race, color, sex, or national origin against any person in access to and use of the facilities and services operated or otherwise maintained on the premises; and tenant will operate and maintain such facilities and services in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21. L 15. DEFAULT BY TENANT - LANDLORD'S REMEDIES. The following occurrences are "events of default" : (a) Tenant defaults in the due and punctual payment of rent, and such default continues for five (5) days after notice from landlord; however, tenant will not be entitled to more than one notice for default in payment of rent during any twelve month period, and if, within twelve months after any such notice, any rent is not paid when due, an event of default will have occurred without further notice. (b) Tenant breaches any of the other agreements, terms, covenents, or conditions which this lease requires tenant to perform, and such breach continues for a period of thirty (30) days after notice by landlord to tenant. At any time after the occurrence of either of the above events of default, landlord may terminate this lease upon giving written notice to tenant and may then re-enter and take possession of the premises in such manner as allowed or provided by law. Tenant will pay landlord all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, in any successful action brought by landlord to recover unpaid rent, or to recover damages for breach of any of the other covenants, orto recoverpossession mtoconditions ofwhich this lease requires tenantPerform premises. 16. HOLDING OVER. If tenant remains in possession of the premises after the end of this lease with the consent of landlord, express or implied, tenant will occupy the premises as a tenant from month to month, subject to all conditions, provisions, and obligations of this lease in effect on the last day of the term. 17. MOVING OUT. At the expiration or sooner termination of this lease, tenant will leave the premises in as good condition as when delivered to tenant (except for ordinary wear and any loss covered by insurance payment to landlord under Paragraph 10) . 18. SALE OF PREMISES. If landlord sells the premises, landlord's liability for the performance of its covenants under this lease will end on the date of the sale, and tenant will look solely to the purchaser for the performance of those covenants. 19. ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS. Tenant has sole responsibility for plowing/snow removal. 20. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.This lease contains the entire agreement between landlord and tenant with respect to its subject matter and may be amended only by subsequent written agreement between them. Except for those which are set forth beenlmadethis bylease, landlord orrepresentations, one anotherwarranties, with or agreements have respect to this lease. TENANT Approved as to form and execution THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: Special Assistant Attorney General By: Date: Title By: Title LANDLORD, STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION By: Director Office of Right of Way and Surveys R3133F.03 6 CONSENT 113(22ir Memo to: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator From: Marilyn Remer, Sr. Accounting Clerk Re: Buy Back of Police Holiday Time Date: October 30, 1991 Introduction The Police Union Contracts allow the Employer (City of Shakopee) may, at their option, buy back from any employee so requesting in writing by November 1st of each calendar year any holiday time off earned but not used by the employee in any given year. Background Requests have been received from Officers Tucci, Flynn, Koch, Nelson, Kaley, Poole & Erlandsen to buy-back up to a total of 430.0 hours of unused holiday time. The impact on the police department budget for this request is approximately $8,600. This is routinely paid the last pay period of the year. Police Chief Tom Steininger has advised that there is sufficient budget balance and recommends approval, therefore staff recommends the City comply with the contract and buy back the hours requested. Alternatives 1. Buy back earned, but unused holiday leave time as requested. 2. Do not authorize buy back of earned, but unused holiday leave time. Recommendation Alternative #1. Action Requested Authorize the appropriate City officials to buy-back up to 68.0 hours of earned, but unused holiday time from Sgt. Kaley, 40.0 hours from Sgt. Poole, 68.0 hours from Sgt. Erlandsen, 88.0 hours from Off. Flynn, 30.0 hours from Off. Koch, 88.0 hours from Off. Nelson and 48.0 hours from Off. Tucci at their current pay rates payable pay period ended 12/29/91. SHAKOPEE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN HOUSE MEMO TO: Gregg Voxland FROM: Tom Steininger DATE: October 29, 1991 SUBJECT: Holiday Time Buy Back Seven officers have submitted requests for payment of 1991 holiday hours. The original letters of request, and copies of request letters that have already been referred to you, are attached to this memo. I have approved these requests as follows: No. of Name Hours Sgt. Kaley �8 Sgt. Poole 40 Sgt. Erlandsen 68 J. Flynn 88 Koch 30 Nelson $$ Tucci 48 omas Inger Chief of Police = /3K jON6L1 Memo To: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator and Members of the City Council From Mark McQuillan, Program Supervisor of Parks and Recreation Subject : Naming New City Parks Date October 30, 1991 INTRODUCTION The Parke and Recreation Advisory Board would like the City Council to expand the Park and Recreation Advisory Board's responsibilities to include recommending names for new city parks, trails and special recreational facilities. This is a common practice in other communities. BACKGROUND When the City created the Park and Recreation Advisory Board it gave the Board the responsibility to: a) make recommendations to City Council regarding park development including maintenance and facilities and equipment, as well as location of new parks and what facilities they include; b) recommend to Council park and land acquisition procedures and dedication requirements; c) submit an annual and five year capital improvement program and d) submit an annual operating budget and schedule for recreational fees. It would be very appropriate to have the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board involved in the process of naming city parks and and special recreational facilities. Guidelines will be established to assist in the process. ALTERNATIVES 1. Do nothing. The process for naming parks will only involve City Council. 2. Amend City Code 2. 57 that will expand the duties of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board to include recommending to City Council names for new city parks, trail and special recreational facilities. 3. Handle the naming of future parks and facilities on a case-by- case basis. RECOMMENDATION Alternative #2 ACTION Move to direct staff to prepare changes in City Code expanding the duties of the Park and Recreation Advisory Board to recommend to Council names for new city parks, trails and special recreational facilities. Attachment # 1 ORDINANCE NO. 290, FOURTH SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE SHAKOPEE CITY CODE BY REPEALING SECTION 2. 51 AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1990 AND ENACTING A NEW SECTION 2 .57 ESTABLISHING A PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE SHAKOPEE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SEC. 2.99 WHICH AMONG OTHER THINGS CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION I: REPEAL Section 2 . 51 of the Shakopee City Code is hereby repealed in it' s entirety as of December 31, 1990. SECTION II: A pew section of the Shakopee City Code is hereby enacted as follows: Section 2 .57 Park And Recreation Advisory Board Subdivision 1. Advisory Board Established and Duties Prescribed. A Shakopee Park and Recreation Advisory Board is hereby established. The Park and Recreation Advisory Board shall have advisory powers and shall be subordinate to the City Council. The duties of this Advisory Board shall consist of making recommendations to City Council on establishing policies and programs relating to park, recreation and leisure services. This includes, but is not limited to, the following: A. The Board shall make recommendations to the City Council regarding park development including the maintenance and upgrade of facilities and equipment, as well as location of new parks and what facilities they shall include. B. The Board shall make recommendations to the City Council concerning park land • acquisition procedures and park dedication requirements. C. The Board shall be responsible for submitting an annual and five year capital improvement program, outlining recommended improvements to existing and proposed park lands prior to July 1 of each year. D. The Board shall make recommendations and submit to City Council an annual operating budget and schedule for recreational program fees. Subdivision 2 . Composition of Commission. The Park and Recreation Advisory Board shall consist of seven members appointed by the Council having staggered terms of three years each. Appointment shall be made by resolution naming the board members and setting the term of office. Vacancies occurring thereafter shall be filled for the unexpired term of the vacant office and shall be by resolution adopted by a majority vote of the Council . The composition of the Board may include citizens from the community representing the following interests in the community: A. School B. Community Organization(s) ' C. General Public D. Senior Citizens E. Neighboring Townships Subdivision 3 . Proceedings. The Board shall adopt Robert' s Rules of Order (Newly revised) and shall adopt such other and further rules for it's own proceedings as it shall, from time to time, deem expedient and shall meet periodically at set times and at other times upon call by a majority of it's members. SECTION III. General Provisions Adopted Shakopee City Code, Chapter 1 entitled "General Provision and Definition" applicable to the entire City Code including penalty for provisions and Section 2.99, entitled "Violations and Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION IV. When in Force and Effect After the adoption, signing and attestation of this Ordinance, it shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City of Shakopee and shall be in full force and effect on and after the date following such publication. Adopted in session of the City CouncL. of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1990 . Mayor of Ci y of Shakopee r CONSENT /, ts MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Cler RE: Request for Release of A atermain Looping Agreement, Document No. 21212 DATE: October 30, 1991 This past March, I received the attached correspondence from Jon Albinson, Valley Green Business Park requesting the release of an existing watermain looping agreement in exchange for executing a new agreement. He desires the release of the original agreement because it now encumbers more property than necessary, including torrence property no longer owned by Valley Green Business Park. It is now possible to identify the property to be benefitted by the future watermain loop. Both Lou Van Hout, Utilities Manager, and I believe that it is reasonable to release those properties from the original agreement which no longer need to be encumbered. Over the past few months, a number of draft agreements have been made and reviewed by all parties. The attached agreement was drafted by Mr. Albinson' s attorney. The legal descriptions contained in it are those properties which will be benefitted by the future watermain loop. The agreement retains an encumbrance against these properties and releases all other property. The agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney, Karen Marty, and she has approved it as to form. Mr. Van Hout will be taking Mr. Albinson's request to the Utilities Commission at their next meeting on November 4th. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize the appropriate city officials to execute an amendment to a watermain looping agreement filed May 15, 1980 as Document No. 21212 . Judy/VIP3RD--.REL 4 , Valley•... rLe�1 BUSINESS PARK March 15, 1991 Mr. Lou Van Hout SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 1040 - 4th Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55379 Ms . Judy Cox City Clerk CITY OF SHAKOPEE 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Re: Watermain Looping Agreement - Document No. 21212 Dear Lou and Judy: Enclosed is a copy of the above-referenced document which is an agreement filed in the Chain of Title on land around 12th Avenue which requires the installation of a 12" watermain, sometime in the future, looping to County Road 83. Over the past couple of years we have platted and replatted a couple parcels of land against which this document continues to be memorialized but, in fact, this should not be necessary. To try to clean up these title issues, we would request that you assist us in our efforts by considering a release on this agreement replacing it with a new Watermain Looping Agreement better defining the exact route the. proposed watermain would take. 12th Avenue had not been built at the time this particular document was entered into. Now that 12th Avenue exists, it appears that we should be able to establish a new document which better defines this area and also assist us in eliminating any problems we are having with the filing on the old document No. 21212 . If you are in agreement with our suggestion, we will request our attorney to draft the appropriate agreements for the above and send to you for your review and approval. The new agreement would still cover the rights and responsibilities of Valley Green Business Park to install a 12" watermain that would loop to County Road 83 sometime in the future. 5276 Valley industrial Boulevard South •ShcKdpee. MI;Irnesota 55379• Taiepr:c;ne: (612) 445-3286 • Facim'Ie. (6121445-9372 Mr. Lou Van Hout Ms . Judy Cox Page Two March 15, 1991 Please let us know your thoughts at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions, please call. Respectfully, VALLEY GREEN BUSINESS PARK , ' \ R. Albinson oject Director JRA: jmcx-036 . 1 Enclosure cc: Dick Peterson Stan Nymeyer Ron Zamansky Toro General Counsel New Agreement Releasing some properties from agreement 2122 . AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT This Amendment to Agreement by and between Valley Green Business Park Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership ("Park") , the City of Shakopee, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") , and Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (the "Commission") . WHEREAS, Park is the successor in interest of Valley Industrial Park, Ltd. , which entered into an agreement with the City and the Commission dated November 7, 1979 and filed May 15, 1980 as Document No. 21212 (the "Agreement") , which Agreement concerns the installation of a watermain on the property described therein; and WHEREAS, part of the water line now has been installed; and the parties have agreed on the location for the future installation of the remainder of the watermain and desire to define the benefitted properties and location of the water line, and amend the description to release the remainder of the property from the Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: 1. That the 12 inch watermain installed or to be installed pursuant to the Agreement shall be located within Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 134 , Scott County, Minnesota and within the Roadway and Utility Easement granted to the City of Shakopee in Document No. 47655 filed in the office of the Scott County Registrar of Titles (the "Watermain Properties") . 2 . That the Agreement filed as Document No. 21212 is for the benefit of the following properties: a) Tracts D, F and G, Registered Land Survey No. 134 , in Scott County, Minnesota. b) Outlots A and B, Valley Park 10th Addition, in Scott County, Minnesota. c) Lot 2 , Block 1, Canterbury Park 3rd Addition, in Scott County, Minnesota. 3 . That except for the Watermain Properties described in paragraph 1, above, and the properties described in paragraph 2 , above, the real property described in Exhibit A of the Agreement filed as Document No. 21212 is hereby released from said Agreement. 4 . This Amendment to Agreement shall be filed in the office of the Scott County Registrar of Titles and shall be binding on all successors and assigns of Park. Dated: CITY OF SHAKOPEE By Its Mayor By Its City Administrator -2- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) SS . COUNTY OF SCOTT The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1991, by and , respectively the Mayor and City Administration of the City of Shakopee, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION By Its Chairman By Lou Van Hout STATE OF MINNESOTA ) SS. COUNTY OF SCOTT The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1991, by and Lou Van Hout, respectively the Chairman and Director of Shakopee Public Utilities Commission, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public • -3- VALLEY GREEN BUSINESS PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, by VALLEY GREEN BUSINESS PARK, INC. , a Minnesota corporation, its General Partner By Wendell R. Kurtz Its Vice President STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1991, by Wendell R. Kurtz, Vice President of Valley Green Business Park, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, the General Partner of Valley Green Business Park Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of the corporation and partnership. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: BEST & FLANAGAN (RAP) 3500 IDS Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 2620K -4- , - • 1 . . 1 1 , cy .: )....) i —• --- 111 ' .... -r3, ci----, ,c--.-— --. ----• • ----- — • - , . ) . _ ' — , •• . cm • (<" ' -----i'-:---- ,1 1 c--, - oc.ut Icaci .83-- , li___ .,. - rn t — . •• ........ ..71— 0 ( . • 1•00,,,.1 1 ____...........__ ; . .1., . . t.i. 1.1. .4s. ......4. t L_-_ . , -. , ,--1,11.1.- L , , at/ 1 . .! . I- .. „ :.-- ---.-- :// . . , . -..... . 011 I' t• I : 1 I -1 . / • 1-7 r., I - It .... • - ,_ I i _ __:_ L. : s_. , 11 . i. . . t , K.) 127 ' I ct. 1 / • .. I • ,SI IP –0• • 1 '..--.1;\ -7.- " --- -----L. ( 0 f 101 •, 1 f -4•- ! f i 1 I • 6) - II; - I I I ti t. 0-• p ; I .; ': :'-•1 7,•.. .-- ...:HE-ci, t / r; 1 •--_-,;_ . 1 I i • it .7 1 • . "'''' ''. - 'i ... Z. ? / / ----------- ...o -, i • 7') ,- , - r r . • i (- • .__.: !. . . , . . _,t.--- i•C7' '• r i (P ! - 1 • -,. t %1: ' 4, v, . . ., „ -, 111 r . ' 1 ' : r ..00 , vt ----/ . (.. i - a: 0 • / • /7 :f / I I 's EP • 07 • ., /7 / 1 .. // / Is Z.-• t‘l / i / 4 !II • C I '• illi•lorpr_4411•111P01,' — —.. —7.- - i=.—____ _________jiti / 1, 1 "Atitoll r— s. t, cn 01PIr•A -7—7Fr-il i i rri P ! •il?"W --,e, mi --- I i • •' s J II .1 •, 1 1 i I P,Iye 1• P 1 i• • j 1 0 -,:-- I • . ' - t • 4 -c- • . ..„ I 1N, • I // C) Ilt NJ I 1: 1.,'. • IS . •1 It 1 . 1 I • 1 l /1/I l• . I. • C.4 , H • 1/// 1 4-- IL----: - . ,•;.__ ••• •••:. /____ • I. . ,...-.....• • . . ....;:--- 1 : 4 • , „, // II.! f 1 :1•41,71., • tr ii , l• i i IE/E'd . • . - .. ._.. S3i INOdWOD dnsrbl-i 6E:GT 66. 132'p .‘..T., l 3 AA CONSENT Without detailed checking, Finance staff is not aware of any bills in the attached bill lists that would cause the respective division to exceed the division total budgets adopted by Council . * W * W W * w w w * W * W W * W W W W W W W W W W W * W W W M * 0 * 00 * 000 * 0 * 0 0 * 00000000000 * 0 0 0 C) (0 W * WW * www * w * w w * WWWWWW(Wwww * w w w 2 (0 * N* * 00 * 000 * O * 0 0 * 00000000000 * 0 0 0 m r (OW * 000000 * CO * 0) O) * AAAAAAAAAAA )1 0 0 0 C) * 0) * G.)‘) * 0)0)0) * 0 * r 0 * 0000000000000000000000 * U) A w 7: C) M Z• -i 0 0 0 -n 1.- I- D 0 00 000 0 0 0 00000000000 0 0 0 -1 0 \ \\ \\\ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ m x W WW www w w w (WWWWWWWWW( w W w D 0 00 000 0 0 0 00000000000 0 0 0 7 \ \\ \\\ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ 0 (O WW (0(0(0 (0 (0 (D (0(0(0(O(0(0(0(O(0(D(0 (0 CO CO v M Mm r r F- r r - F- F-• F. rn M D 3 u)0 WW 0 C WO r CO 00 NN..) WW I... WW NN NN 1 AA (ONV U0)U)N AA WW 00 0 V AA WW WW WO W O W r O0 U)V AA N N MW (4t9-s- F-VIA F-V WW WW WW 00 WNr NVOU) 0)0) VV 00 VO)A C)-4 -AO►.WNI- 0000 U)0 AA 00 (0A U) U)(r00 00 00 0)0) 1-.0VO)0I-N(000 4NA O)0) 00 U)U) * * * * * * * * * * 0 C)C) C)C)C) 0) W W >>>>>>>>>>> D > N M mm >>> D M 7) -4-4--1 --1-1--)-1-i-4-1 m 0 0 -DI rr 1-Z -)--4 --1 -< > 9.9.9.9•99.9.9. D 3 0 > CC m m m m rr mmm 0 Z m 11-(1-4-1111-11 C) N m m = DD 0JW07 1 > 0 vv CCC > 0 0 00000000000m <00 Z MMM N 0 > 00000000000 N m 0 M 00 '0j'< 0 X Z 33333333333 -4 z ZZ 000S 333Z333Z333 0 -C) DDD 1-4 M Z 0 I MMM Z 000 C) Z > Cm) -1- DDD CC) M -1 Z V) 7, (ANN -4 C) rn S22 (A 0 M N 1 M M M -11 mmm v N m 0 mm 000 m C 0 1-i-,-I)1M1-1-1-1-1-1-4-1-1 -(m mmmmm mm m m C M C rr CCC 0 m C (A Ci)0)rr rrrrrr 1 0 1-i m M mm MMH -n -n M C)C)C)mmmmmmmm M m r 3 v mm v v v D v v v v v v v v v 1 M 222225 N 1 0 1 00 Ill m m 22 Z- 00000000 C) m H m D Z Z >>> v > Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z D X1 rn v) H mm M.41-. < 3 M mm P11'l rn mm m Z < N C) Z Z Z Z D Z C) A -4 111 1 1 m M A v 1 H H Z 0 N Z 0 00 000 N 0 0 00000000000 00 0 0 > I- 0-.0-. 1....0-,.-. W F- 1-- 1- r 1 . C) 1 III I I, III 1 CI I A AA A A A A A A A A A A A A AAA A A A A A A 0 N WW N N N W N N 0.0.0 W W W W W W W W (0 W W C W NN WWW I- r W (0<0(ONNNNNNNN N r V Z N 1-1- N N N 0 U1 N (O(0(0 0) 0 0 --( I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 W WW AWr U) A A I-F-F-O)AAWWF-rr 0 W r Z F- NF.. F-W V V N A V Uf W A N F-N 1-V U1 N 0 0) 00 0 1-- 0--1"' /-.1-.1-. 0 V I- 0 F- A • I 11 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I W WW 4:*W1- A A A 1 .0-.F-0AAWW0--0-.10 W F. ).y 1•-' Nr F-WV F- N A V0WAN1-NI-V U)N 0 F- CO 1 r 0 () it I- A r 00 v 1 V) • 0 0 F- (O it I--- 3 m v * * * * * * N D 0 * * * 71- Cl) .0 * » * » * 0 m I I I 1 I 1 m C) C) C) C) C) C) C) CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 r * W * C.) * W C.)W W * C.) * C.) * WW * C.) * CJW * C.) * WW co * 0 * 0 * 0000 * 0 * 0 * 00 * 0 * 00 * 0 00 * w * w • w w w C.) * w * w * C.)Co) * C.) * C.)4) * (..) * C.)0 2 (D * N * N.) * NNNN * NJ * NJ * NN * N * rr * r * 1-4 14-4 m N- * C) * C) * C.)WCs)4) * C.) * N * r r * r * (O(0 * V * UI CP A * VI * (.) * 00 CO CO CO * N * r- * CO CO * A * r r * r * A A 7C A 4-4 Z' -i 0 -< 0 0 -Ti r 1- rr►-r r '- 1-4 1-4 r 1-44/-4 r- r D 0 0 0000 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 -4 CO ���� �� �� �� rn = C.) C.) CJ C.)C.)C) w C.) C.)C.) C.) C.)C.) C..) (.C.) D 0 O 0000 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 S. �,,,,� �� �,, �s, 0 (o (0 (0(0(0(D (0 CO (0(O (0 (0(0 (0 (.O(0 r 1- rrrr r r ),--)- r 4-.4-. (-- 4-.4-. m M D 3 0 A A C - - Z AA C)C.) ANN r r -I NN C)C) 00000000r CS(UI V V r rl-- rCO r NN N•-r rr o-o-. UI C.)C.)C..)NJ C)Cf AA 4-•fd00 VV 000UI 0000 01U10 CO(0 00 CO CO U1 UI VI C) (0 CO V V r A V 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 CO 0)0 VV 0000 UIr0NU1 NUI NN U100I to‘11 000 00 000 , * )1- * * * * * * * I. 77 A 1-41-I)-11.1 4-4 I OO to 00 -Ti mm I r ZZZZ C) Z DD -I 00 r rr D > V)N(/)(n 1 -I << m << D << A C -(1-(V D CA r 1-4 -0 2 1-11-1 --I O 00 2 -I-4 m ZZ < m m .23 A A m -I-•I-I-( 22 Z DD 00 Z 7C mm mm CC MM -< 'TI M O 0 V)V)NN -I-4 2 ZZ -C--4 0 r -(--1-(-.1 -(-C C I~M m <-< A 0) 1M,--"-'' 0 0 xa Z Z 0 -0 ZZZZ ZZ r 00 0V) 2 000)0 m A CC m < NN 0 -o-o A r,-,-(N mm A T. ZZZZ AA -0 /"1-" C)AC)A << ZZ A C)C) m C) H Cl) V M A CO -4 -0 v v v C) -0 -4--I -1 AA rn M 0 r C A AAAA C A AA A 00 0 OC -C -0 D 0000 m 0 DD D ZZ C C V m < T-11-I,'TI 0 'Ti << < -Ti,, 1-4 '-1"0 I r m mm m -0 -0 I- 1-1 1.1 r Cl)CO Cl)CO 2 CO .-r r 2*2. '••( O m mmmm Ti 3 3m rn V) 2a AAAA 0 A 202. 2+ ON > >V) N <<<< C < A A '-1 1-1 A Cl) 0) N(.) Cl) SS Z Z A C CO CC C 00 -( -1 1-"1 CO A CO CD W 00 Cl) A (N(1) Cl) r r -I 1-4 H H H 1--4 CO N 1--1 (/) -0 N N V) 0 -4 -I --1-I -I Z 0 Cl Caw(.)0 O N 00 0 00 0 00 D ✓ r rrrr r CO 1--1-4 r r.- r rr C) i , , 1 1 , , , , , A A A A AAA A A A A A A A A A A 0 N W C.)W C.)C.) W C) C.)(..) C.) CJ C.) N N fV C I- (..) r r r r CO - (J W G) (0(0 C.) (..)1--- Z 0 0 0000 I- 0 00 0 00 N.) N0 -I 1 , ( , 1 , , I 1 , I I I I I I C.) A CO N VI A r UI A A r C.)r C.) C.)C.) Z 1- CI 000000 r N N Nr N o--NJ N NN 0 ✓ r UI UI UI- r N rr 0) N0) r 4-.1-- I I 1 , , , , 1 , , , , , , 1 , W A AAAA r A A A r C.)r C.) C'•)C..) ,--I r N rrrr N r Nr N o--NJ N NN Z r ✓ n 00 N- V A VI O 0 r , co it r 3 Ti V) D * * * * * * * * * (1) C) * * * * * * * * * * > m * * C) 1 , , , I I , I 1 * * * * * * * I m A C) A A A A A C) C) A N Cl) Cl) Cl) CO CO CO Cl) CO CO N * W * W a WWW W * W * WW * W * W a (w * W * W r * 0 * O * 000 0 a 0 * 00 * 0 * 0 a 0 * 0 * 0 C) CO a W a W * WWW W a W a W W * 6) * W * W * W a CJ 2 (0 a 0) * C) a C)Q)C) (11 * A a W W * CO * N * N a N * NJ C) r r * CO 0o a a CO * W * O O O c0 a r a CO tO * V * r *a W * W * r 7: C") M Z• -I 0 -< 0 r r r r 4- r0 T1 1•- r r 4-• r f D 0 0 000 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 -I (0 �.,� -, �� - - m = W W WWW W W W W W W W W C.) D 0 0 000 0 0 �.,,, \o\ 0 0 0 0 (0 (0 CO CO CO CO CO (0(.0 CO CO (0 (0 CO -0 r r o--.1.--•• r r rr r r r r r m m D 3 I-r r r. V 0) C (71(j1 N r r r AA 0 CO(D NN WW AA AA I-1-• rr(O AA AA rOOW AA C...)44 V1 U+ NN AA U1 U1 NN r(OO r co co C)0) (OW0) NN WW 00 0)C) VIN W CO V V 000) 00 0 0 N N 0 N N 0 0 0 0 W W 0 0 00 00 oov10W (0(0 00 (O(00 (nut 00 00 NN 00 a * * * * a * a * a a 3 3 333 3 3 33 3 r I- 0 7 Z D r-+NI O-I CO 0 z z D m D m DD 1 0 mmm 0 i- 0 Ni l z m ) ZZZ f-I- C Z m IN m < z (nNN Z 000 r0 33 m Z z y m D -(--I-( D C003 Z CO M Cr) 0 < DDD C 14-41 2.21 m CI) W D A X) m C C C Z 1-1 000 SS 0 0 0- m1 Z II C) XI m m - 0 (n 0 m '1111 M m 0 CCC -4--I 7 z z z 000 A m 0 H CO -4m a (0 -I C C C A CO 0303 m v C) -I m p-I C z z z z m c r r0 v m D mm D 70 '� -4 13 < 333 H v CC IC-4 0T 0 < 1Ci 3 r m v v"0 -I r v 1 r m r r F-I r-r- H 33 N 0 m 0 0 0 D • 3 m MI CO 21 D (0 1-1,1 > >J 2 D 0 z Z Z HC) (n 000 C) -I-1 Z < TI CO Z 73 C(A 3 3 3 z -4 0 c -( ), 03 v N 000 V) -4 til Iti H Fi CO Z N0 -4N -I Z 0 0 000 00 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 > 1- r rrr r 1- •-•I- r r A r r 0 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 C) P A AAA P P P . P A N A A 0 N W (0 NJ NJ NJ N W (J (.3 NJ C r W U1 U7(.fl N I- W W W 1-- 0 W W 1 O 0 NNN C) 0 00 N 0 N 0 N -I I I I 1 I t W r 0)PI- 1 1 1 I I I I I 64 Of A A N N ANW 0 NJ AA A 0) 0 r A 0 A 0 NJ A ►- r rrN O r rr r r O r r I 1 I I I I I I 1 I (a I"' C)A r O W 0)A A C) 0 r A M N NJ ANW 0 NJ AA A A 0 N A Z I-• < 0 co W N (0 f0 W Or V V 3C r Ir IV 1-' V1 r N 00 0 1 • 0 0 ►- CO iC r j 3 m v 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I I m N N N N N N (n N N CO W C..) * W C.) * C.) * W * C.)C.) * W * W CJ CJ * W CJ * W * Cr) r 0 * 00 * 0 * O * 00 * 0 * 000 * 0 O * O * O C) CO W * (.3C.) * C.) * w * C.)C.) * w * C.)CO w * w C.) * w * C.J 2 CO A * AA * A * A * AA * A * AAA * CJ C.) * W * W rn ..- CO CO * (D(D * CO * V * CJI CJI * C.) * r 1--r * CO CO * (0 * 00 C) VI * ,-r * I-- * (O * V V * CO * N N.)N.) * O) VI * 0 * V 7` C) M z. -I 0 -< 0 0 m F- F-F- r F- r r r F-r r r - r F- n 0 00 0 0 00 0 000 0 0 0 0 --1 N (a C.)C.) C.) w cJ C.) C.) C.)w w C) Ca C.) w Y 0 00 0 0 00 0 000 0 0 0 0 7C � �� �., ��� -, 0 CO CO CO CD CO CO CO CO CO CO CO (O (O CO CO -a I-• r F- I-- I-• r F- r I-F-1- I-- 1-- I- 1 m M D 3 C.)C.) r o•-•.... 0 F-F- I-WI--I- I-l- C • - - • • - - • Z r 1-- AA NN N r (C I-V 0 NN CAO) VV -I AA CAA N) CJI CJI NN A(DA CO CO WA COO C.)C.) VV AA O)O) VI CJI VI 0 VI 00 0)CD AA(O CO CO VF-A NJ C.)C.) rI- 000o CO C0 00 000 00 til LII VV(D 00 0)1-UJI- (.71(.0 CA.11 00 NN 00 000 00 NN 0 CP Vl 00 CON00(O V V V V 00 (0 CO * * * * * * * * * * * N NV) A 73 AM -01 000 Z z Z Z C) 0 0 -< -< >> D V) CO 0 D O 22 CA > 00 7) V)(/)V) 1.3 v < -I -I I-1 F-( > Z 1.-1 F-( 7< D r- --1 -1 rr 7 00 1 333 < 0 H IN 0 0 NCI)) FZ-( 9.202* CN) z � I 10 zm Re --II >> C)DDD m 0 Z Z 7o 0 0 1 00 V) C) CO 70 -i > 7:7: m N N 0 7 C _C) 73 IM 141 C) 0 0 0 0 (1) 2 m 7,70 (A -I >> 0C)C) RI C) 00 rn Z \\ C) N C) O z z 73 0 73 M rn 141 1-4 141 In 7 7a < (DCO Z Z Z Z A O 1--1 a)a) -I C)C)0 < 70 m z 00 m m A C) o)O) M G) N N 1"( N -I m z I- Nao C 0 mN -a vvv C C C) C F-I M mr -I -1 .0C 7J XI707O -I -I -I --I C) >0 I-1 = C v 0 0 0 0 I-+ I-I 0 I-+ rn > rC) r rn F,-u -n -n-n-n r r r 3 r 7D -0 r F-1 H 0 1-1 0 3 N (-( V) V1 N N -I -I I -I 0 T 0> -< 1-( 3m m. rnrnrn H H 0 1-1 rn .-I >I-I N I D(I) 70 A 70 70 m m m V) I-- -1 Z J 1-I < <<< V) Cn :S) N (7 1-1 H-1 I A Z T 73 1 1 > 0 -i 0 1-4 O 0 1.1 < 'a Z -4 �1 -1 •••1 m 0 M 1 N 0 00 V C.) 00 0 C.JIV0 O 0 CO I D ✓ r t-- I- r r F- r r VI 1- 14 r A A C) I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O A A A A A A A A AAA A A (J A 0 W NN (..) VI N'.) W W W W W +.) (.) W C r 413.4) N r C.)- 1- 1.14 1- V V 0 V Z 0) N0 A (0 N0 0 000 0 0 N) 0 -I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I F- AC)) V VI (J I-. W VI Vt A A A 0 *.. Z C.) N C.) F- V I-r r CON I- N N 0 A 0 A CON C.) N r 1- F- VI F-F- V V 0 N I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I-. A 0) V A C.)I- C.) AAA A A 0 r 1•. CO N NJ 1••- I- I-. 14 r 1-.1-.1.4 N N 0 A 1 < AA NN CO t-- o-- F-r 0)V F- I- 1•-•N CO F- A r 3C .- C.) C.)V V F- CO N N- A 1-• N) -0 I 0 0 I- CO SC I- I M v V) D * * N. * * * * * * N C) * * * * * * * * * > rn * * * * * * * * * 0 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I rn C) C) C) C-) C) 0 C) C) C) 7: 7 7: 7: z 7: 7 7: z CO N N N CII 0 0 0 0 A W * W * W * W WWW * W * W * W * W W * W * W W * F. 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 000 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 00 * 0 * 00 * C) CO W * W * CO * (4 www * W * w * w * C..)w * W * C...)C.) * _ CO CO * 0) * V1 * VI V1 N VI * N * V1 * ()1 * (j1(.11 * V1 * V1 V1 r m I... 0 * 0 * CO * CO CO CO CO * V * A (4 * NN * r * o...I-. * C) (7) * 0 * CO * F. 000 * 0) * V1 * W * V V * CO * V V * 7C C) M Z' -i O -( 0 0 -n r r r r rrr r r I-- rr r I-•I-• D 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 00 0 00 -i (A s, s, �,,-. � �� ,,,, m Z w w w C.) www w w w (.)(a w CO C.) D 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 00 0 00 ��-S - � - -S� �� 0 CO (0 (0 CO CO CO CO (O CO CO (0 CO (O (O(0 -0 r H- ).-- r 1-r r r r I- 1-.1..... I- r F. m m D X 0 A (511"..)C4 C z WW 4-.4-• VIA F-F-- AW0 -4 C) AA NN W W NJ NA V1 V V CO CO W W F. NN N(OG) W rr (0(O F-r O)NA(0 00 WW NN N cow AA NN0 0 03 co 00 C4 4.1 01AVVI 00 (0(D CO(.0 i-C)A AA 0-.1..0 0 00 00 AA COOrV 00 VI CO VV NW(O 00 AA0 * * * * * * * * * * < C) < C CCC C V) 0) (/)(/) -I V)C/) -V M D Z Z Z Z Z D C C 0 o- N m I- N 1-4)-11-1 H D 73 -0-0 3 C C F-I C) I- -I-I-I < V 23 mm 00 -< Z 0 0 0)000 , I AA N 1..4O DD -4 m -4 m m I-( 0 0 ZC) 1 z a FN.) Z N m 0 X r mmm -i -i I- D - C) zZZ -< 0 AO '-'-'r 4-4 D V) 0 -i-I-- 0 ?. 00 Z -C) Z V) 3 DDD 0 r DD C) _ 0 3 rrr -1 (n m m F 73 0 Z V)(/)(1) 3 C) X C) rnmm z 0 <<< -0 m H cn m Po C -( W -( a CO 00 n V) -I 171(/) --1 -I X3 r m mrr 00 Fl Fi D v r 300 Z v D G-0 D == m I- < 0 m I-1C)C) -0 -0 < H.0 < mm 3 Fr m -0 ---I r m -o r rn .'O Al rD O CDD rI r H r v F-1 2'F D N I-11-4 171m u" HZ ZHH V) V) 9. 33 N CO Z m H Z Z 0 H v-0 C) V) 1 TI-i-1 Z 0 Z Cr) AA 23 CO Oz O C -I C 00 H 3 0 CO CO H V) -i V) .'O V) H H H N N 0 -i m -i -i Z Z ..i I-' O O O Co 00 O O r 00 O W W D A r r r I-1-.1.--. r F. A rr r rr 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i 1 1 I 0 A A Jr Jr AAA A A A AA A AA 0 (.- W N W (ON N W N W NN W VI VI C V W W N WWW CO r W W r W r F. Z O O O r NOO O O O NO p <0 GO I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I r r r 0 OAW A A r WW (..) VI 4.11 Z A cn co 1-- ONr r A A r r Co-V 0 W r r r Orr r r N NN r (11 NJ I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 ' I r r r O) OAW A A r WW W AA H A tri co F- Oro r r A A r r i•-•$-• Z A V1rr V1 V1 CO O O O rn V A co AA rr it r co I-00 VIA r 1 • O O '- I i 0 U r . m v N D * * * * * * * * * x• (n3 C) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 m V) N N V) N N V) (/) N Ci) V1 a W W W W W W W GJ W W * (J * 4) * W W * (.) * 4) * r O 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 * 0 * 0 * 00 * 0 * 0 * C) CO W W W W WWW W W W * W * W * W W * W * W * 2 (0 00 0o 0) 0o 00 00 0o 0o 0o 0o * 0) * CO * CO 0) * of * C) * m 4- 0 O 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 * U1 * C.) * NN * N) * r * C) V C) 1.11 A W W W N r 0 * r * 0 * V V * A * CO * 7C C) M Z• —i 0 -C 0 0 T r r r r rrr r r r r r rr r r D 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 -1 CO - \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ m = W C.) W C.) W W W W W W C.) W W W W W D 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 7: \ - \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ 0 CO (0 CO CO CO CO CO CO (0 (0 (0 CO 40(O (0 CO 10 r r r r rrr r r r r r rr r r m MI D 3 0 A C • Z AA rr VIu( (J(U1 rr V M U1 U1 NN NN NN VVVV VV rr AA 4.J1(1 (O(O (OWN WW AA C) 00 rr VV VV rr)--.r (71(11 NN U1 U1 COW NN NW(O NN 0)0) W 00 W(O UIVI NN NNNN 00 (O(0 00 00 00 rOr (D(0 (1(71 0 00 Vv 00 00 U1 UIV1(J1 CO 00 00 00 00 (DAu1 00 00 0 ** * * * * * * * * * * * *C) T T m 000 > > D N Z ZZ Z Z M M )( MMM Z 3 3 D D mm D m '41 A Z v 000 0 C) N (I)Zr) 2 CO M D A M H N Ill A --I X -I --1-I r- -I (-' 2 Z rn -•(-4-I A m m Co m < CmNrrr 0 CO(0 Z* v m 0 -I 3 00 C Z A CO \ Z C) > m m E co 0 C) rn C) I AAA V) A A Z > r 0 m 0 m mmm 0 m D mm 2 M A Z 3 CO V)(j)N N Z C) 00 r N -C) N 3 Z 000 CO -I RI cc 2 2 C) CCC m 3 MM M 1-4 m W Z A AAA A (11 v- Z Z C) 0 m 000 Z C) C) 7: Z Z CO mrnrn -I N CO -< A 1 v CO m A 0 M N M A C) 0 0 v ACCO CO CO m CO C M CO V) M C C A DDC C C 0 C -1 OC C C —4 0 m m 0 Avv -o -0 C -0 M C-0 v A m N CO T M M-0 -0 M M r M'o •1J I C) -(-(r r r- - r M yr r r 2 12^ CO DDM M M M M M M M 0 C) m rrm rn m 3 m M 3m m m m N N A N CO N > N m D(0 CO N N A C C < mm M CO M C) T 0 CO 00 Z Z A O N N C C -i -I 1-1 C) C) r M -0 .'V 7J -0 0 -4 M M F-1 A -0 0 -4 -4 Z 0o 0 0 N 000 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 O > A r r r rrr r r r r r rr r r C) 4 I 1 1 I I I 1 I 4 I 1 I I I C) N A A A AAA A A A A A AA A A 0 W CO W W UI U1 N N N.) N N W NN N N C 0 (0 (D r rrr r r W r V Wr r r Z N r r 0 r r O 0 0 N 0 0 NO 0 0 ---1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 i I I 0 C.) r N A A A 0) 0) W 0) V 0) . r r Z 0 N C) r rrr A r N G..) N C.)A W C) 0 O 4- r N rrr r r r 0 r Nr r r 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 0 W r N AAA C) C) W C) V MA r r 4-4 0 N C) r rrr A r N N N NA W C) Z M V U1 (0 r A (O U1 r r 0 r (O A r 00 (71 M It r 0) 03 N CO 4.11 W r (J CO U1 V O) 0 0 4- (O st I- X m -0 N D * at * * * CO C) * * * * * * > rn * * * * * * C) I I I I I m C) C) C) C) C) C) CO CO CO N CO 0 C) W W W W W CO W W CO W W W CO w W W W W W W r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) CO W W W W W w W W W W W W W W W W w w w W = CO CO 00 00 00 CO 00 00 00 0000 Co CO 0o 00 CO CO Co Co CO Co m r P4 N N N N N r r rrr I- r r r r r r 0 0 C) to A W N r 0 (0 co ....1-4,3 O) (J1 A W N r 0 CO m X 0 N Z• -I O < 0 0 T1 r r r r r r r r rrr r r r r r r r r r > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 N W W W W W W W W W w w W W W W W W W CO (4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � - �\\ � - � � 0 CO (0 tO (0 (0 t0 CO (0 (0(0(0 (0 t0 co (p (0 (0 (0 (0 co v r r r r r r r r rrr r r r r r r r r r m rn D 3 W W r r r r 0 rn rn v v C z N WW NN (Si N WW WW WW NN --.P-4 O N WW -I (Jt 00 WO) too AA rr NN CoCONN tO(0 (0(0 (J00 (0(0 O)C) VV rr to MM 00 00 00 AA Qom W w (J(J G)w mm NN 00 MM W ao 00 (DM 00 00 O 00 00 00 00 00 00 AA UiUTAA 00 00 00 00 moo 00 tom 00 c$10 0 00 00 00 00 00 V V 00 0000 00 00 00 00 AA 00 4,0. 00 00 . I * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0 N N N N 0 W v 000 7C Z 3 Z 3 0 ri G) O 0 > Z Z M D >>> < Z r --I z Z I''' rr < 3 M r X CO G) Mt Z Z Z Z r-I CO > m D m C) 0 M N 0 3 r-I = < z z 0 a z - z < rn m m CO --( m vvy m Z > 4 m m Z 0 0 rn M M P11 N 0 Z Z Z r -I -( Z 0 0 3 m0 r 0 0 n -i-4-( CO C > -I 3 0 w 0 1-4 M-I C) C 0 > C rn 0 0 � f- > 0 73 z -0 A m CO 73 Z r (/) D -4 rn r C 0 -1 C) C V -< CO = Z m 1-i 0 N r-I 0 -I .v C) 0 C n C Z Z 0 7C rn XI CO C) CO Z C m -4 D rr --i C Z m r. C) C) 0 r -I N CO m m -17 0 Z I C) m -4 CO C)N N C) C) C) C) CO C) CO 0 C) rr m C 0 1--1 0 v 73 C C C D C 0 C C -( 0 v Cl) Z 0 > v Ov0 0 0 0 u v Z v m 0 m 'Ti v 7C 0 I'I T - r < v v ( v �1 r- N 3 r m r C)r r C) C) C) -I r r C) (0 H C) Q* 0 r H 2 1--I r-1 2 2 C) > 1-i Q+ H Q° 2 0 m N I N A Q44 COL7 0(m0 6) L) 2 r m rn L) m (n C) N C N -0 C) < < A m m 7o m C) C A C) 2 N mww m m m O C 000 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 I-( O 00 WW 1-1 0 C) v I-- (0 Co00 - r v -I V) M MM (0 ry r-( (0 oo Co -0 0 -I --I Z 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 00 0o Co 0 0 0 0 0 Co D r r I- r r r r r A r r A A A r r r r r A C) I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I I C) A A A A A A A A N A A N N N A A A A A N 0 W NJ r A W W W N W(J^J W W W (J1 NJ W N W W C r r til (0 (0 r W r O r r 0 0 0 r r (0 r t0 O Z O 0 r (0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 N N N r 0 0 0 r N -4 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I-• W (0 W r O) W r Orr 0 0 0 A r r W r 0 Z 0) r r r V 0 r N ONN 0 0 0 N 0) V N W 0 0 r r- r- W r r N r Orr O 0 0 r r r r r 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r- W (0 W r 0) W ►- O r r Co 0 0 A r r w r 0 r.1 O) r r r V N r N ONN 0 0 0 N C) V N W 0 Z < CO W W OO A CD 0 r 0 V I- r.. A W A 0 0 A S r V Co A V 0 C r v I • 0 0 r- I (p It r I M v CO > CO 0 D m 0 m V am * W W w r IF 0 0 0 C) 0 s W w W 2 CD s CO 00 CO m r s N N N C) • 0o V 01 T A M Z• 1 O -< 0 O T r r r D 0 0 0 -4 N \ \ \ m 2 C4 w ca D O 0 0 7C \ \ \ 0 co co co m ✓ r r m m D ✓ 3 N r A r W 0 N Or UiArN 0)0) C Z N 00A00WV00 00 NN WW rr N -1 00 0)r U)VV<DAN0)V 00 0000 00 U) N NAOWAAA VI0) 0000 NN U)U) U) A 0430NVW0)NN0) U)0) 00 00 0 V 0Ut000N00000)00 00 00 00 0 s * s * N A C 1 C D Z O T T T T T T T T T T M Z ►-) -I CCCCCCCCCC D 0 < D Z Z z z z z z z z z 2 D m < r 0000000000 r 33 m V) r 0 Z 0000V CJNNNNr0 2 1-1 0 Arrr WU)WrAr Pa Z -I0 H 0 < 0 --1 1111--1 111 1 Z N -O 0000000000 m 3 0 2 -I-1-1-1-1-4-4-1- 1 m T m >>>>>>>>>> C) T. C) rrrrrrrrrr rr 3 X M z C) M C m 0 G) I-. N -4 RI 73 mMN -i0NC)1L) > C) C) H c/Dmcoo)73OD33m 0 0 1 C)-(Z(OCODCuDZ C 0 Z m zMmr 1-+11-4zm r T 3 0 0 M 0) - U)M -I c) r 1-4;DmD-•-.D 2 2. 0 - rT. 4C)Ar--ir -i G) m CVOmr A in N 1 Z m C) -.c. m '- m C) C) AOOmO 3 C 0 T 2 M C < I >0)'0 Z N 0 0 `--i V) m4u<A 0 0 "0 1 C r+ 10 r 1 C)Z1M< N rr C)DDM 0 vlrcn3 z • r-• N m 0v Z z 33 1 0 C.4 Ti m 0 C) 1 0 00 0 > 4- A r C) I I C) w N 0 U) w :.) C 0) 0 co Z N.) N 0 1 t I I 0 0 W Z 0 0 W 0 O 0 r II I 0 0 W i-) 0 0 W z 3t r r O 0 r co it r 3 R1 v 0 D s V) G) D m s G) m C) X O CO • 0 1 CO CO Co ,0D 0 0 0 0 du OD OD CC) OD OD OD < < 0 0 OD 0 0 0 0 d H 1-' H' 1-11-, N' 1-' 1-' F-' H H 1-1 1-1 H H+ H' H 0 0 HH ' ' I-11-1 H H Ft, W .0 .O .0 .0 .0 W N W co \O \O \O \O \O \O \O LJ1 '0 VO \O W W I- N N N N N H H \O W N N N W N N N 'O N CO W \O W 0L.' H N 0 n O vn 0 0 W -1 H I- CO N 0 N `n I-, H 0 0 • > H 0 0 O 0 O W 4- H•' N O O O O O O O O O O\1 I-' N n -1 0 0 0 0 0 H R) \A N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N vi vi ON 0 0 0 0 O I--' -1 1--' OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I--' H H I-, c+ 0 H-' 00000W 4- 1-, 1-, 0000000 0 0 ON-1 H H c0+ -1 0 0 0 0 0 I-1 N Vt N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-N •n \A 0 Cr (D K OD 0 '=J 0 CO CO OD C D 0 0 0 0 CO OD CO OD Co Co 0 OD 0 0 0 0 H' H C H H N H N H 1- H I-' I-' H - H H' H H I-' H H H H' H H I I C7 H H' H H+ H H H H H H H H I- H H+ 1-' H H H H I--' H 1- • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ro G') y HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH 1•-' H' 1--' H 1--' H > c< CD O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 1-3 K (D > c+ H P n a � � n H "Li K 0 c+ ‘...r] H' H N \O -1 I- 0 \n W 1--, CO I-' > O\ 0 I- - H' W H 0 N O\ W W 0 0 < < N - - H 0 O Ob H Co 10 N dOO ~ ON OW4" CO H' WW O CO O OD N = O\ O cl- ap +Cp ON \-n . H ON ON 0 0 0 0 ON W \O 0 W -1 `n 0 H ON co 0 0 0 0 0 ON O\0 0 0 \O 0 0 W Co - 0 4- 4-CO 0 OD NCO 0 0 F c+ 0 > ? 0 �n �n o 0 ro 1- K (D CD cD CD CD K 0 0 K CD CD CD CD m m m o 0 o co P 0 K (D V1 O 0 3 333Q K P) 3 3 3 3 3 3 H H 3 H Sv 2 �-3 W r r r H. r• y < r• r• r• r• r• H. H. C7 CJ c+ r• CD 1-5 < P CD ct c+ c} cT c+ P (D Cr: c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ ct (n CD '1 • CI) Cn C) ro H' O\ (D ro Cl) '=i 17 (D (D ~ C7 Cl) ro 3 '=J rJ < t' r3 H m K O I-' \O 'I< CEJ H H H PCD K Cl) A° t i (D H W (D H H 0 f) Cl) f'° a < 70 H C] '-3 < 3 C) '-b H c< ii C1 H H '-') X C) (p > > H' P CD > CD K r• > I-' (D Cl) c' 0 0 0 '1 H' P c< H 0 Cr C7 H Ur) r• O ~ CD PP Cl) Cl) H. C21 Cl) cc+ 'd Cl) H cam+ 0 < n [r1 • W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WWW W W W W W W W W 1 -1 1 - -1 -1 - 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 O\ O\O\ ON ON x O 0000000000000000000 0 '.0 \O\.o '.O '.O H H H H H H' H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'O \O\0 '.0 O 0\ \11 •$ W W N H' 0 .(3 Op - 0\ `n W W W N H 0 \O CO CO -1 ON Z H 0 • C) ro CI = 3 CO C] c7 X H 'd 'U C1 = = 0 0 3 '0 = 3 3 3 < 0 t1 0 P I--' r• 0 Z 'V �J tr1 0 � 0 Z Z K Z Z 0 () Z 3 c+ 3 3 0 0 3 K r. < > 3 -- c) cG 3 U) > > CO 3 ..^. '•7 `7 K 0 "U 0 a• 1 \ 0 I CD r• H. 0 () CD > 0 go 0 0 0 CJ > C) 3 0 0 O H' H 0 H. '0 H K '-4 P co H N r• Z 1-5 P (D CD c+ 'CI c+ 3 r X x 00 Z• c+ 7D 70s cep ( ) H 0 Cl)• < CI) H H• HP I CD Cl) cc++ 3 < 0 = P o) 01; `� b P 0 C c+ a K C 7 CT c+ C) > H H CJ/ 0 0 Cl) CD ,0 CD ^.1 0 Cl) (1) 'd '1 CD CD P H (D 0 co a CD < K C) vii H+ H I•-' O 73 H- 0 `n W H' -1 H' a 0 O H' -p- \I H W H' 0 N ON W -4-- < N - 1-03* H N CO 4-- N\J1H OD 4- \O Co VD H H 0 0 Co N H' • w Co 0 Co 0 N 0 -1 `n 1-+ C7 C7 0 0 0 0 Co ON `" ON 0 0 0 0 ON W \O 0 0\ 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0\ O\ 0 0 \O 0 0 W OD 4-" 0 O\ 0 OD 0 0 0 CO1\ESENT MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk(1F- / RE: Boards and Commissions Expi .ing Terms DATE: October 31, 1991 INTRODUCTION: According to City Council policy, it is appropriate that Council consider at this time the reappointment of individuals whose terms on boards and commissions are expiring. BACKGROUND: According to the policy, ninety days prior to the expiration of terms each year, the Council shall be advised of the upcoming vacancies and the attendance record of the individuals whose terms are expiring, should those individuals be eligible for reappointment. At that time the Council shall consider the reappointment of those individuals. Should the Council determine that the individuals merit reappointment, they will be contacted to determine if they wish to seek reappointment. Council shall also announce the upcoming vacancies and that applications will be accepted from all interested citizens of Shakopee. Application Deadline: Since adoption of the current policy, there has been confusion on the exact date that applications will no longer be considered. Sometimes there have been insufficient applications received and Council has made nominations as late as the same evening of appointment. Last year Council set the final date to receive applications as the first meeting in January. This is the meeting that nominations are made. Council may wish to set this same time frame this year. Recommendation: Direct staff to provide Council with all applications received for Boards and Commissions until the first meeting in January and retain the right to re-advertise if an inadequate number of applications are received. Eligible Appointees: Attached is a list of the individuals whose terms are expiring and who are eligible for reappointment. Their attendance record will be placed on the table Wednesday night. Recommendation: Direct staff to contact all board and commission members whose terms are expiring inviting them to apply for reappointment. Boards and Commissions Expiring Terms October 31, 1991 Page -2- Board of Review: Last year was the second year that the City Council appointed a separate Board of Review. Unless Council directs otherwise, staff will advertise for applications for this committee also. Summary: Staff will follow up on advertising, posting, and mailing notices on accepting applications for filling the expiring terms on city boards and commissions. A letter will be sent to each member whose term is expiring January 31, 1992 inviting them to consider reappointment, unless Council advises otherwise. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Announce that applications are now being accepted for expiring terms on city boards and commissions and direct staff to follow up with appropriate notices. 2 . Move to accept all applications for boards and commissions until the first council meeting in January, 1992, retaining the right to re-advertise if inadequate applications are received. 3 . Direct staff to contact all board and commission members whose terms are expiring inviting them to apply for reappointment. CITY OF SHAKOPEE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS TERMS EXPIRING JANUARY 31, 1992 Planning Commission: Eugene Allen Nancy Christensen Energy and Transportation Committee: Donna Roman Elmer Otto Susan Stolarcek Park And Recreation Advisory Board: Steve Johnson Robert Tomczik Board of Review: Eldon Reinke Richard Marks Steve Clay Gloria Vierling Robert Sweeney Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals: Housing Advisory & Appeals Board: Randy Laurent Jim Link Shakopee Public Utilities Commission: Jim Cook Police Civil Service Commission: Marcia Spagnolo Cable Communications Advisory Commission: Shakopee Community Access Corporation Board of Directors: Lillian Abeln Bill Anderson Community Development Commission: Jane Dubois Mike Pennington Community Youth Building Committee: Ann Tuttle Joyce Bassinger CITY OF SHAKOPEE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS TERMS EXPIRING JANUARY 31, 1992 Planning Commission: X: IN COMPLIANCE WITH Eugene Allen X ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS Nancy Christensen X Energy and Transportation Committee: Donna Roman X Elmer Otto X Susan Stolarcek X Park And Recreation Advisory Board: Steve Johnson X Robert Tomczik X Board of Review: Eldon Reinke X Richard Marks X Steve Clay X Gloria Vierling X Robert Sweeney X Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals: Housing Advisory & Appeals Board: Randy Laurent X Jim Link X Shakopee Public Utilities Commission: Jim Cook ? Police Civil Service Commission: Marcia Spagnolo X Cable Communications Advisory Commission: Shakopee Community Access Corporation Board of Directors: Lillian Abeln X Bill Anderson X Community Development Commission: Jane Dubois X Mike Pennington X Community Youth Building Committee: Ann Tuttle NO Joyce Bassinger X -3- III. Nominations and Appointments Nominations and appointments shall be made annually by the Council in January, pursuant to Resolution No. 2206, A Resolution Setting Forth City Council Procedural Policy On Appointments to City Boards And Commissions. (Pursuant to Res. 2559 , Appointments to Shakopee Public Utilities Commission shall be made in January and shall become effective April 1st. ) SECTION B: OPERATIONS: This section pertains to the operations of various advisory boards and commissions of the City of Shakopee. The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission is not advisory and does make its own policy which it deems in the best interest of the community. I. Attendance A. Should a board/commission member be unable to attend a meeting, it shall be his/her responsibility to contact City staff 24 hours in advance of the scheduled meeting date. Failure to do so shall count as an unexcused absence. B. Attendance at the meetings of these advisory bodies is critical to their effectiveness; therefore, one unexcused absence, three consecutive excused absences, or absence at more than 25% of the meetings in a six month period will cause the board/commission chairperson to review the nature of the absences with the member and, pending the outcome of that review, it may be necessary for the chairperson to forward a recommendation to the board/commission as a whole for discussion and recommendation to the City Council that the member of the board/commission be removed for poor attendance. C. Individual boards/commissions may grant extended leaves not to exceed 6 months in length at the request of a board/commission member; provided, however, that the board/commission is comprised of six or more members. During the extended leave the vacated seat shall not apply to the quorum requirements of the board or commission. II. Terms of Office All members shall be appointed for the term stated in the City Code or in the enabling resolution establishing the board or commission; however, said term may be terminated early by the Council. Each member may serve a maximum of three (3) consecutive terms. For purposes of this policy, an incumbent at the time of writing of this policy shall be considered to / 30 CO1SENT MEMO TO: DENNIS KRAFT, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DAVE HUTTON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CHAINSAW PURCHASE N)11 DATE: OCTOBER 21 , 1991 INTRODUCTION Staff is seeking City Council permission to purchase a long reach chainsaw for $1320.00. BACKGROUND The Public Works Department is responsible for maintaining the boulevard trees and trimming branches that are obstructing signs or over hanging onto sidewalks, alleys or streets. Quite often there is the need to reach high into a tree to cut the branch at the trunk or other appropriate places per current forestry standards. The current practice is for public works employees to stand in the front end loader bucket and reach the branch with a regular chainsaw by raising the bucket. Staff is extremely concerned about that practice and feels that it is extremely unsafe. Staff is therefore requesting permission to purchase a long reach chainsaw that will minimize or eliminate the current practice of using the loader bucket. This chainsaw runs on hydraulics by the use of coupler hoses connected to current equipment or vehicles. The price of this chainsaw is $1320.00. The current policy is for City Council to authorize all Capital Equipment purchases that exceed $1000.00. The current Public Works Capital Equipment budget has an approximate balance of $2600.00. All Capital Equipment items budgeted have been purchased, several of which were for less than the budgeted amount. ALTERNATIVES 1 . Authorize the purchase of the long reach chainsaw for a cost of $1 , 320.00 utilizing the Capital Equipment Fund. RECOMMENDATION Based on safety concerns, staff recommends Alternative No. 1 . Since a large part of the tree trimming is done in late fall/early winter after the leaves are off and since there is an excess fund balance in the Capital Equipment Budget, staff would like permission to purchase this item out of the 1991 budget rather then the 1992 budget. It should also be mentioned that this item was inadvertently left off the 1992 Capital Equipment request, so currently it is not listed in the proposed 1992 budget anyway. Since the funds are available out of the current budget, staff recommends the purchase of this equipment. ACTION REQUESTED Authorize staff to purchase a long reach chain saw for a cost of $1320.00, utilizing the Capital Equipment Fund. equip/c-saw D 411M 1670 SOUTH 2nd STREET HOPKINS, MN 55343 612/938-5451 Equipment & Supply Inc. FAX 1-612-938-0159 Custom Truck Equipment for the Utility, Construction, Railroad and Refuse Industries October 14, 1991 City of Shakopee Quotation #101491-628 129 E . 1st Ave . Shakopee, MN 55379 Attention: Mr. Dave Hutten Dear Dave; In response to our phone conversation on October 11 , 1991 , I am pleased to quote you the following hydraulic tools. One ( 1 ) Fairmont model H6310C1 long reach chainsaw ( less couplers ) $1, 185 .00 less demo discount. . . -$ 100.00 $1,085 . 00 One ( 1 ) 30 ' hose set ( less couplers ) $ 135.00 One ( 1 ) Fairmont model H4850 rotary hammer drill ( less couplers) $3,095.00 One ( 1 ) Fairmont model H6245 direct drive cut-off saw ( less couplers ) $1 , 655.00 #137125 saw cart $ 800.00 Thank you for considering ABM Equipment and Supply, Inc . and we hope the above information will allow you to place this business with us. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, )(; } 1, Ron Zimmer Sales RZ/jam Bringing you the best names in the business Memo to : Dennis Kraft, City Administrator From Mark McQuillan, Program Supervisor Subject . Budget Amendment Date 10/24/91 Introduction On August 6, 1991, the City Council authorized staff to hire a temporary Recreation Assistant to assist with recreation programs. Council also requested that user fees be increased to help fund this position. An amendment to the 1991 Budget was not done and is in order. Background Council agreed to fund the temporary position by generating $4, 200. more in recreation revenue and using $2, 050. from the general fund's fund balance, totaling $6, 250. IN ADDITION: At the request of the Youth Baseball/Softball Association, the Parks and Recreation Dept. purchased baseball supplies for their programs. The Association reimbursed the City for the full amount of these supplies. Therefore, an adjustment is also needed to show an increase in expenditures of $4, 035. (surface materials 01. 4215. 641. 64) and an increase in Revenue (01. 3823) for $4, 035. The Recreation Division's 1991 Budget Expenditure should be amended to reflect an increase of $10, 285. and Revenues to show an increase of $8, 235. Alternatives 1. Status Quo. This would result in laying-off the temporary Recreation Assistant immediately. 2. Approve Resolution No. 3486 Action Offer Resolution No. 3486, a Resolution amending Resolution No. 3309 and move for its adoption. RESOLUTION NO. 3486 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 3309 ADOPTING THE 1991 BUDGET WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a budget for the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, changing conditions and circumstances warrant amending the budget, OF NOW, THEREFORE, that theIT Eaacounts are changedBY THE CITY CasNfollows THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, Fund Division Account Amount General Recreation 01.4100.641.64 (Wage Increase) $5800.00 .00 II II 01.4141.641. 64 (FICA Increase) (2050.00) II Fund Balance (Fund Balance Drawdown) Revenue Increase 35.00 it Revenue 01.3571 (Youth Trips) 390.00 ,I 1g 01. 3595 (Gymnastics) II 11 01.3560 (Adult Ed) 110.00II II 01.3570 (Youth Ed) 320.00 11 11 01.3591 (X-Country) 20.00 U II 01.3592 (Youth Volleyball) 320.00 �� il II 01. 3572 (Youth Wrestling) 20. 00 II II 01.3588 (Youth Football) 420.00 ii II 01.3575 (Youth Basketball) 540.00 li to 01. 3578 (Youth Ski Club) 80.00 11 II 01. 3563 (Adult Basketball) 315.00 of II 01. 3565 (Adult Volleyball) 1440.00 ii it 01.3586 (Youth Hockey) 190. 00 General Recreation 01.4215. 641. 64 (Surface Materials) $4035.00 . 00 11 Revenue 01. 3823 Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1991. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney 40/ i) CONSENT MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Karen Marty, City Attorney DATE: October 31, 1991 RE: Fire Department Releases We have received requests from time to time for a release of liability for fire department training exercises. The insurance company has agreed to these releases. Due to the short notice we receive on some of these requests, it would be helpful to have general authority to use this release form. Signed /4, )_0___ //44- 7 Karen Marty, City Attorney KEM:bj m [31RES] Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 3490 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATE CITY OFFICIALS TO ENTER INTO INDEMNITY AGREEMENTS FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT TRAINING. WHEREAS , from time to time the Fire Department makes arrangements to enter onto private property for training, such as burning buildings or rappelling; and WHEREAS, the property owners sometimes seek a release from liability, or an indemnity agreement; WHEREAS , the request for the release may come on short notice; and WHEREAS, our insurer has approved the attached release form. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS : That the appropriate City officials are hereby authorized to enter into indemnity agreements with property owners for fire training purposes. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1991. Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: City Clerk Approved as to form: ?:"' % ,'. ' City Attorney [31RES] MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Karen Marty, City Attorney DATE: October 31, 1991 RE: Fire Department Releases We have received requests from time to time for a release of liability for fire department training exercises. The insurance company has agreed to these releases. Due to the short notice we receive on some of these requests, it would be helpful to have general authority to use this release form. Signed ? - 56 /4. 7-t4P Karen Marty, City Attorney KEM:bjm [31RES] Attachment INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT The City of Shakopee, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota, with offices at 129 E. 1st Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota, hereby agrees as follows: 1. The Fire Department of the City will use the property of for fire training purposes, including exercises, on the date of 2 . The City agrees to assume all liability for all claims for damage, actions or causes of action arising out of the use of this property for fire training purposes and, except for negligent acts of , its agents and employees, hold harmless from any such claims. Executed this day of CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA By Mayor By City Administrator By City Clerk Prepared By: Karen Marty City Attorney 129 E. 1st Ave. Shakopee, MN 55379 [31RES] / G MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Resolution No. 3485, Canvassi g the Returns for the City Election DATE: October 24 , 1991 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND: Attached is a draft of Resolution No. 3485, A Resolution Canvassing Returns for the Municipal Election. A final copy of the resolution will be placed on the Council table for their consideration on November 6, 1991. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Offer Resolution No. 3485, A Resolution Canvassing Returns for the Municipal Election, and move its adoption. JSC/tiv RESOLUTION NO. 3485 A RESOLUTION CANVASSING RETURNS FOR THE MUNICIPAL ELECTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that it is hereby found and determined and declared that the regular municipal election held in and for said City on November 5, 1991, was in all respects duly and legally held and the returns thereof have been duly canvassed, and the votes cast at said election were as follows: For the Proposition: Shall the City Council be reduced from six to five members? Yes No For Mayor, two year term: Gary L. Laurent For Council-at-Large, three (two) four-year terms: Michael Beard Dolores M. Lebens Clete Link Joan Lynch George F. Muenchow Joe Zak NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the proposition to reduce the City Council from six to five members did (not) receive the majority of votes and that is duly elected Mayor, for a two year term, commencing January 1992 and and are duly elected to the City Council, each for a four year term, commencing January, 1992 . Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 19 Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney . \IA ' C- RESOLUTION NO. 3485 A RESOLUTION CANVASSING RETURNS FOR THE MUNICIPAL ELECTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that it is hereby found and determined and declared that the regular municipal election held in and for said City on November 5, 1991, was in all respects duly and legally held and the returns thereof have been duly canvassed, and the votes cast at said election were as follows: For the Proposition: Shall the City Council be reduced from six to five members? Yes 1136 No 932 For Mayor, two year term: Gary L. Laurent (R3 For Council-at-Large, three (two) four-year terms: Michael Beard 1117 Dolores M. Lebens 723 Clete Link 1026 Joan Lynch 1115 George F. Muenchow 904 Joe Zak 927 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the proposition to reduce the City Council from six to five members did receive the majority of votes and that Gary L. Laurent is duly elected Mayor, for a two year term, commencing January 1992 and Michael Beard and Joan Lynch are duly elected to the City Council, each for a four year term, commencing January, 1992 . Adopted in Special Session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 6th day of November, 1991. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney - i i I { )\ \ \ •,. w. J o T CC ,.) icy 0 >' ;-, c ►Z-+ -7c-c- c< c �" \ ; r-, U r W Z a ti . -k 1 F `Q D G'. U Ea ' W W gg z w N O .Y N. Li H U r; W14 v r.-"( • r. ,r, r , 2 .. w Z _ \ H "r) r1 U Ch W i w �� Z2 �. C:1 _ ` _ - `� '� - W U S . . z D - . o z U 0 aA 41•1111/1 �v r i - ,-` r' — --1-UO L' . r-r C-< L s'.-- :1-<, ,-, •-r _ _ :...i > U _ o 7.-. or I N0 W v II a H O 1.) cn H H N W sD� U U 0 41 a 0o Ai Ei 3 .-aoO a a 1--iN H OG Z H 0 Z = U 0 � C4 0 Z a w XUZ >4 0 ‘..0 N oa Z >4 D D 4 Ca Z Z W x H to = to w v i-- 0 w w H a a H w 400 w 0 -7 Z. r U 0 as a a a Z N C.) >+ . Z w >4 Z • 001 SHAKCPEE P-1 4.E3 CZ.=C:1r . rr: C7i i7:17 i:74;. 77. LT:• SOPtr2P AS -. • ▪ • Total Votes Cast 431 Numoer riaer Votes ▪ i5 isoimmer over Votes 237: SHAKOPEE COUNCIL ( Elect DO-CS - L... •-•. •ci. t7, JOAN GEORGE F. mUENCHOW 171. i3 JOE 176 13. ;••••.:. E. ,:•••• Nu,:lber SHAKOPEE PROPOSTIOA, • Votes • Y:777; • . . . . . . . . . . • Nt.tiner Linc.er. Number Over Votes 0 . 0% TOTAL TYPE 1 BALLOTS 43, 0212 SHAKOPEE P-a .7• •_7, • :" r • - 117, Tot ; - -- NLMILe7' VOt Nurcbe v • SHAKOPEE CCUINC.I ... ( ec4.-; . 3EORGE F. MUENCHO:A: 174 JOE ZAK -------------- Numoer Ove- Jot?.s SHAKOPEE PROPOS:TION YES . • Over a:3 • • . _ • • . Numper uncle:- Voz.es i., Numoer Over Votes • 0% TOTAL L-07S C.- TOT .. TYPE I BALLOTS 365 003 SHAKO---.EE P-3 4 -4 - 4.4 "L N, • • _ Tot . Votes Cast Uncer- vor..es 44 Numper Over Vctes . 61-$AXDPEE C012AC: SCAN LY-C:-. GEORGE F. MUEN„..HOW JOE ZAK 17-3 ----------- --- UV=i- . &-IAKOPEE PRO?08. T.10.,4 . . . , . . . . . . _ Numtier• Lndt-L4r. k.c.sez Number Over Votes 0 . 0% TOTAL cL_U I3-14 TOT . TYPE 1 BAi..1...OTS 35,4 Z104 SmAOPEE P-4 Ci V" 1" .1" Vozes Cast Lricer- Vcrces - GE ( JOAN LY(,C...-- ,E.. . 4; GECRGI: F. rqUEN:: Eif JOE ZAA - • . - D% r Vo SHAAOPEE PROPOSITIO:fl: YES . . . - • : . Over Vozes . . • • NufflOer Cncer VO,;es CAE7 470 TOTAL TYPE 1 BALLOTS 470 005 SHAKO-EE P-5 :E34-24:72 1 i ': "c+. J N.4 ti''f .. 014: 1 1-,-; - - L....'.E7:::_::::.-1- c.4 Qs,-i •-,_. -_ !•i:a-'ti, P»r.E.71.--7-!. • ; s -s .r ia,_•p SHAKOPEF MAYOR GARv L. LARENT 37E 68. E3 31 f. ..e'. Tctal Votes Cast 42S Number ricer Votes E 6. 65% Nttmner Over Votes +Zt . 0% S P:1C5='EE OCLiNCIL- ( E.:.ec* 3) C:_-ITE LINK CIN LYNCH ,`,all;`_ - . , . G=DRG F. !nU_.iC:-:'CW `. L9. 4::% .TGE z;�r, 1.4. ;-",7%. -o,-;a.. -_t: - - NU1,:uCr Lflc,' Votes FrS 1. '.:.if=:. i�ttsr*Ji3r• Over Votess +Lt i,c. Sr KOPEE PROPOSITION . YES `4,J y._ ,V - -. . .. 4-?. . _oto._ Vote= Cast s.- - �:c i Number Over Votes 0 07 PROPOSI7iOry SCHOOL 01E7. 7E0 YES . o.a- 'C•T:E5 V .S.: �- - Number Lr:ce" Votes 3 . 56.; tl»tt;;^ er Over Vc••tes ,; TOTAL BA: Ci-f-5 CAS-7 436 TOTAL TYPE 1 BRL_LOTS 436 cOSEt"1T /Lid MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator FROM: John DeLacey, Engineering Tech. III SUBJECT: Valley Industrial Blvd. No. Project No. 1990-8 DATE: October 25, 1991 INTRODUCTION: Council action is required for a resolution accepting work and making final payment on the Valley Industrial Blvd. No. Project No. 1990-8. BACKGROUND: All of the work for this project has been completed in accordance with the contract documents. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 3488, A Resolution Accepting Work on Valley Industrial Blvd. No. Project No. 1990-8 and move its adoption. JD/pmp RESOLUTION NO. 3488 A Resolution Accepting Work On Valley Industrial Boulevard North Project No. 1990-8 WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Shakopee on August 7 , 1990 , S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. , P.O. Box 212 , Shakopee, MN 55379 has satisfactorily completed Valley Industrial Boulevard North from County Road 83 to Valley Park Drive by Reconstruction, in accordance with such contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved; and Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 19 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION CONTRACT NO , : 1990-8 DATE: October 25 , 1991 PROJECT DESCRIPTION : Valley Industrial Boulevard North CONTRACTOR : S .M. Hentges & Sons , Inc . P . O . Box 212 Shakopee , MN 55379 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 233 , 920 . 50 QUANTITY CHANGE AMOUNT $ - 930 . 51 CHANGE ORDER NO . 1 THRU NO . AMOUNT , , , $ 3 , 839 . 41 FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 236 , 829 . 40 LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS $ 236 , 829 . 40 FINAL PAYMENT $ -0- I , hereby certify that the above described work was inspected under my direct supervision and that, to the best of my belief and knowledge, I find that the same has been fully completed in all respects according to the contract, together with any modifications approved by City Council . I , therefore, recommend above specified final payment be made to the above named Contractor , `( Professional Engineer 1(1'1 Cr “ l.'s ri..1.1 l'''.." li 'k.) C..i\I I 72/S2i MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Adm. . strator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City ClerkL.—. RE: Application for One Day Ga + ling Occasion DATE: October 23 , 1991 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND: The Shakopee Lion' s Club is applying for a one day off-site lawful gambling license. They will be conducting a bingo occasion on November 15, 1991 at the Shakopee Knights of Columbus Hall on East 4th Avenue. They are required to obtain a one day off-site gambling license. Prior to the Gambling Control Board issuing a license, the local government must adopt a resolution approving the application. As you are aware, the Lion' s Club already holds a gambling license for the sale of pull-tabs at Jerry' s Bar, 124 South Holmes Street. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Offer Resolution No. 3484 , A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Approving an Application for a One Day Off- site Lawful Gambling License for the Lion' s Club of Shakopee, and move its adoption. JSC/tiv RESOLUTION NO. 3484 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR A ONE DAY OFF-SITE LAWFUL GAMBLING LICENSE FOR THE LION'S CLUB OF SHAKOPEE WHEREAS, the Lion's Club of Shakopee is seeking a one day off- site lawful gambling license to conduct a bingo occasion at the Shakopee Knights of Columbus Hall, 1760 East 4th Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Gambling Control Board requires that localhe a unit of government pass a resolution specifically approving r denying an application for a one day off-site lawful gambling license. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, as follows: That the application for a one day off-site lawful gambling license for the Lion's Club of Shakopee for November 15, 1991, at the Knights of Columbus Hall, 1760 East 4th Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota, be approved. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1991. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Admi ' strator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Request To Spend Gambling Fu ds DATE: October 30, 1991 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The Shakopee Fraternal Order of Eagles have presented the City with three checks. They have requested that the funds be earmarked for specific uses. They have discontinued selling p ullt themselves and are disposing of their proceeds. The donations include $2, 000. 00 tot he City for the Recreation Department, for Derby Days, and $500 for the Community Access Corporation (Public Access) . Staff has researched the law as it relates to the use of gambling funds. The City is an eligible donee for gambling funds while the Chamber and the Access Corporation are not. Advertising and promotional signage are eligible expenditures of City funds. Therefore, it is staffs recommendation that the City accept the funds from the Eagles and that they be spent on advertising and/or promotional signage for Derby Days and the Access Corporation. The recreation department is a part of the City, so there are many eligible sources for the use of these funds. Since we are nearing year end and neither the Chamber (Derby Days) Committee or the Access Corporation have any planned use of the funds in 1991, staff is proposing that the contributions be placed in the General Fund balance at this time. ff to early rlypla992 the a budget amendment will be pursued by aforementioned contributions in the appropriate divisions for expenditures in 1992 . The Eagles must document their expenditures so that the gambling board can monitor whether or not their expenditures meet the lawful purpose requirement. The City must complete a "Request by a Government to Spend Gambling Funds" form - see attached. RECOMMENDATION: Offer Resolution No. 3489, A Resolution Accepting Gambling Funds from the Shakopee Fraternal Order of Eagles, and move its adoption. CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Admi /q- ) ' strator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Request To Spend Gambling Fu ds DATE: October 30, 1991 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The Shakopee Fraternal Order of Eagles have presented the City with three checks. They have requested that the funds be earmarked for specific uses. They have discontinued selling pulltabs themselves and are disposing of their proceeds. The donations ns include $2,000. 00 tot he City for the Recreation Department, for Derby Days, and $500 for the Community Access Corporation (Public Access) . Staff has researched the law as it relates to the use of gambling funds. The City is an eligible donee for gambling funds while the Chamber and the Access Corporation are not. Advertising and promotional signage are eligible expenditures of City funds. Therefore, it is staffs recommendation that the City accept the funds from the Eagles and that they be spent on advertising and/or promotional signage for Derby Days and the Access Corporation. The recreation department is a part of the City, so there are many eligible sources for the use of these funds. Since we are nearing year end and neither the Chamber (Derby Days) Committee or the Access Corporation have any planned use of the funds in 1991, staff is proposing that the contributions be placed in the General Fund balance at this time. In early 1992 a budget amendment will be pursued by staff to place the aforementioned contributions in the appropriate divisions for expenditures in 1992 . The Eagles must document their expenditures so that the gambling board can monitor whether or not their expenditures meet the lawful purpose requirement. The City must complete a "Request by a Government to Spend Gambling Funds" form - see attached. RECOMMENDATION: Offer Resolution No. 3489, A Resolution Accepting Gambling Funds from the Shakopee Fraternal Order of Eagles, and move its adoption. RESOLUTION NO. 3489 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING GAMBLING FUNDS FROM THE SHAKOPEE ORDER OF EAGLES WHEREAS, the Shakopee Order of Eagles has discontinued the sale of pulltabs; and WHEREAS, The Eagles desire to distribute their remaining proceeds for lawful purposes as set forth by law; and WHEREAS, the Eagles desire to donate to the City of Shakopee, $2, 000 to offset expenses for the recreation department, $750 to offset expenses for Derby Days, and $500 to offset expenses for the Shakopee Community Access Corporation for 1992 expenditures. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, that the City hereby gratefully accepts the contributions made by the Eagles to help offset expenditures for the recreation department, Derby Days, and Shakopee Community Access. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk is authorized to execute the "Request by a Government to Spend Gambling Funds, for the Shakopee Order of Eagles in the amounts stated above, in conformance with Minnesota lawful gambling requirements. Adopted in special session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 6th day of November, 1991. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney CONSENT ) � Memo To: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator From: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director Re: City Vehicle Policy Date: October 25, 1991 Introduction Council took action recently to authorize a second Fire Department Officer to take a city vehicle home. The City Vehicle Policy should be amended to reflect Council action. Background Council took action recently to authorize a second Fire Department Officer to take a city vehicle home. The City Vehicle Policy should be amended to reflect Council action. Action Requested Offer Resolution No. 3487 , A Resolution Amending the City' s Policy for City Vehicles and move its adoption. GV:mmr CITY VEHICLE POLICY October 25, 1991 Vehicles owned or leased by the City of Shakopee are divided into two categories. These categories are (1) regular city vehicles and (2) commuting use vehicles. Further information and regulations for the aforementioned categories of vehicles are provided below. Regular City Vehicles Regular city vehicles are those vehicles owned or leased by the City which are to be used for official business only. No personal use of these vehicles will be allowed except for de minimus use such as a lunch stop between two business locations or other meal stops associated with city business. Employees shall use city vehicles when available for business use. Employees who use their personal vehicles for city business shall be reimbursed at the rate allowed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) . The City may require proof of insurance be provided by city employees using their personal vehicles. Commuting Use Vehicles Certain city owned/leased vehicles may be assigned to employees for commuting use as well as official city business. These vehicles are used for commuting purposes so that they can be available for emergency responses. These vehicles are to be used for business of an official nature and for commuting use, except for de minimus personal errands between the workplace and the employee' s residence. The city shall adhere to IRS regulations regarding the reporting of the commuting use of city vehicles. The following employees shall have commuting use vehicles: Police Chief Fire Chief and One Other Fire Department Officer Public Works Director Other Conditions The taxable portion of the employer provided automobile shall be grossed into the employee' s wages. The use of city vehicles may be further delineated in a city vehicle drivers policy. All city vehicles, except those used for police and fire purposes, shall be marked and licensed as being tax exempt in accordance with applicable state statutes. RESOLUTION NO. 3487 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY' S POLICY FOR CITY VEHICLES WHEREAS , the Shakopee City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Shakopee to formulate a policy to regulate the use of city owned/leased vehicles and private vehicles used for city business; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to clearly convey this policy to city employees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the Shakopee City Council does hereby adopt the City Vehicle Policy dated October 25, 1991 which shall be attached hereto and made a part hereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Resolution No. 3226 is hereby repealed in its entirety. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , - 1991. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney l5 a. , MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Legal Opinion on the Use of TIF Surplus Funds DATE: October 31, 1991 INTRODUCTION: Councilmember Sweeney has requested that the following item be placed on the City Council agenda for discussion and action. BACKGROUND: The City Council appointed a task force to evaluate the feasibility of developing property located immediately South of the Shakopee High School for school and city purposes. One of the recommendations considered by the committee was to utilize surplus Tax Increment Financing (TIF) revenue for potential land acquisition and construction purposes. In that this property is outside of the TIF project area there is some question as to whether TIF funds could be expanded for the above mentioned purposes. There is growing interest in the public acquisition and development of this area by both the community-at-large and the City Council. Councilmember Sweeney believes that it is prudent for the City Council to obtain a legal opinion on the usage of TIF funds for projects in this area at this time. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Direct that the City Attorney seek a legal opinion from the Attorney General 's office relative to the legality of using TIF funds for the purchase of land and\or construction of a community center on the property located immediately South of the Shakopee High School located within the Council delineated moratorium area. 2 . Direct the City Administrator to seek a legal opinion from the City's Bond Counsel, Tom Hay of Dorsey and Whitney, and determine whether TIF funds can be used in the subject area. 3. Direct the City Attorney to research the subject and issue a legal opinion on the use of TIF funds in the subject area. 4 . Take none of the above mentioned actions. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council discuss the pros and cons of the above mentioned alternative courses of action and direct the staff to follow-up in a manner consistent with the will of the majority of the Council. ACTION REOUESTED: Move to direct the City Administrator (Attorney) to contact to obtain a legal opinion on the usage of TIF surplus funds for acquisition and\or construction of facilities in the moratorium area located immediately South of the Shakopee Senior High School. #l(-7 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Karen Marty, City Attorney DATE: October 31, 1991 RE: NBZ V. City When NBZ sued the City in August, they presented three separate claims: for an injunction, for longer hours, and for a "taking" claim for the period of time they could not operate between 1985 (when their conditional use permit application was denied) and 1988 (when the Court ordered the conditional use permit granted) . The Judge severed the injunction issue, set an early trial date, and that issue is now resolved (except for any appeal) . The other two issues remain. Our insurers declined to defend us on the injunction issue, because it was not covered by our insurance, and was tried separately. However, they have determined that they will provide a defense for the rest of the lawsuit. The hours issue is covered by our insurance. The taking claim is not insured, because we did not buy the appropriate endorsement until after the claim accrued, and therefore any damages on this claim will be out of our own pocket. The cost of the defense will be borne by the insurer. For your information, I believe that we have excellent defenses to these two remaining claims. If you have any questions regarding this, please let me know. Signed /'•'j' /- Karen JKaren Ma y, Citiy Attorney KEM:bjm [31MEMO] cc: Dennis Kraft Lindberg Ekola