Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/18/1991 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items DATE: June 14 , 1991 1. Attached is a memorandum from Dave Hutton regarding Shakopee Bypass - Consultant Services. 2 . Attached is a memorandum from Dave Hutton regarding Shakopee Bypass - Jack VanRemortal Property. 3 . Attached are the June 3 , 1991 minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting. 4 . Attached is the Building Activity Report for May, 1991. 5. Attached are the April 1, April 15, and May 6, 1991 minutes of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 6. Attached are the Revenue and Expenditure Reports as of May 31, 1990. 7 . Attached is correspondence from Valley Green Business Park regarding the Business Climate in the State of Minnesota. 8 . Attached is the Police Newsletter for Council review. 9 . Attached is the June 19 , 1991 agenda for the Energy & Transportation Committee. 10. Attached are the May 15, 1991 minutes of the Energy & Transportation Committee. 11. Attached is the June 19 , 1991 agenda for the Community Development Commission. 12 . Attached are the April 17, 1991 minutes of the Community Development Commission. If MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator ..----10trt,___ FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Shakopee Bypass - Consultant Services DATE: June 10, 1991 INFORMATIONAL ITEM TO COUNCIL: Based on the City Council direction to maintain all City costs associated with the Shakopee Bypass to the $1. 0 million dollar contribution, staff was directed to meet with Mn/DOT and the consultant, Barton-Aschman & Associates to discuss the cost overruns for the consultant services and to determine what measure should be taken to keep the cost below $1. 0 million. On June 5, 1991 staff met with Mn/DOT officials and Barton-Aschman & Associates to discuss this project and the best way to complete the consultant work without exceeding the $1. 0 million dollars and without substantially delaying the project or placing additional burdens on Mn/DOT staff to complete the project. As a result of that meeting, all parties agreed to the following course of action. Barton-Aschman will complete the design of the project as detailed in their Scope of Services. Mn/DOT will complete all of the right- of-way acquisition work, appraisals, etc. which originally was part of Barton-Aschman's contract. With Mn/DOT completing this portion of Barton-Aschman's task, Barton-Aschman' s final fees will not result in the City of Shakopee going over the $1. 0 million dollar cap. Mn/DOT officials have indicated they can assume the remainder of the right-of-way acquisition work without any substantial delays in the scheduled bid lettings. The scheduled bid lettings may be delayed 2 to 4 weeks, but those delays may have occurred anyway. Therefore, there will be no need to work out any agreements with Mn/DOT for reimbursement because the consultant contracts will not exceed the $1. 0 million contribution. Staff wanted to inform the City Council of this action because of the City Council discussion several weeks ago regarding a change order to the Barton-Aschman contract. That change order will no longer be needed. DH/pmp INFORM MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator '----&Aj FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director ' SUBJECT: Shakopee Bypass - Jack VanRemortal Property DATE: June 10, 1991 On June 6, 1991 City staff met with Mr. Jack VanRemortal and his partners along with Mn/DOT officials and Scott County officials to discuss Jack's concerns regarding the impacts of the Shakopee Bypass and the Bloomington Ferry Bridge interchange on the Backstretch RV Campground. As you recall, Jack was concerned over the loss of access and the loss of visibility of his campground by the construction of the Shakopee Bypass and the Bloomington Ferry Bridge. Jack feels that he has not been given a fair chance to discuss this issue with Mn/DOT or Scott County and therefore the City Council directed staff to set up a meeting between all parties to discuss those concerns. At the meeting, Mn/DOT officials indicated that they would be buying "access rights" from this property. By that, Mn/DOT will be acquiring all rights of the campground to have direct access to the Shakopee Bypass. The campground will still have access to 13th Avenue which it has now, but by buying the access rights to the Bypass the campground will not be allowed to have direct access to the Bypass. As part of this process, Mn/DOT will obtain an appraisal to buy these access rights and submit an offer to Jack. Jack then has the option of obtaining an independent appraisal at Mn/DOT's expense and if neither appraisal is acceptable to Jack, he will have the option to go through the Condemnation Court like any other property acquisition procedures. If the condemnation award is not acceptable to Jack he will have the option then to appeal the condemnation decision to the District Court. Throughout this entire process, Jack will have the opportunity to present his case and submit facts on the impacts on his development by these highway projects, such as loss of income, loss of access, and loss of visibility. Apparently, prior to this meeting Jack was unaware that Mn/DOT would be going through this process and did not believe he would receive a fair hearing on his concerns. Based on the proposed access rights acquisition process, Jack and his partners are quite agreeable to using that forum to express their concerns and following the process that is allowed him. Therefore, no action is required by the City Council in this regard and Jack has agreed to follow the correct proceedings to present his concerns. Staff wanted to inform Council of the results of the meeting. DH/pmp VANREMORTAL OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JUNE 3 , 1991 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 7: 00 P.M. with Councilmembers Zak, Wampach, Sweeney, Vierling and Clay present. Also present were City Administrator Dennis R. Kraft, Assistant City Administrator Barry Stock, City Clerk Judith S. Cox, City Attorney Karen Marty, Public Works Director Dave Hutton, and Finance Director Gregg Voxland. Sweeney/Wampach moved to approve the minutes of August 15, 1990 , January 15, 1991, January 29 , 1991, and February 11, 1991. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kraft explained that he had received a letter from the Walt Harbeck Highway Committee and that Mr. Hopps and Mr. Foslid are present to talk about alternatives for a memorial to Walt Harbeck. Discussion ensued on possibilities for a memorial and included: a wayside rest area at the dedicated park in Killarney Hills, a dedication sign naming the individuals who devoted considerable time and energy toward the successful culmination of the bridge and Southerly bypass, a park memorial, and a memorial plaque at the interchange off of CR-83 . After discussion of the alternatives mentioned, it appeared that the most appropriate might be a memorial plaque/sign at the interchange at CR-83 . Mr. Hopps thanked the Council for their time and suggestions and stated that he would take the information back to the Committee. Mr. Voxland, Finance Director, explained that the Tax Increment Trust Fund has a balance of about five million dollars and that it was interest bearing. He said that he was feeling uncomfortable with having that much money in the fund and asked Council to come to some consensus on how it could be used. Discussion ensued on how TIF funds could be used. Because of new laws on the use of TIF funds, there was concern that however the dollars are spent that it is in conformance with the law. Mr. Voxland suggested that Council consider defeasing the three bond issues which are pooled to support Districts 1-6. This would allow Districts 2 (Highrise) , 3 (Downtown) , and 6 (Motel) to be closed. We may not be able to close all three right now, because the $5, 000 , 000 may not be enough. He needs permission to ask Springsted to do the computer runs to tell us exactly where we are. Mayor Laurent recessed the meeting at 8: 26 P.M. Mayor Laurent re-convened the meeting at 8 :40 P.M. Sweeney/Zak moved to refer the defeasing of the three bond issues to the next Council agenda. Official Proceedings of the June 3 , 1991 Committee of the Whole Page -2- Mr. Voxland stated that Tax Increment Districts 1 (K-mart) and 4 (Racetrack) would remain open. He said that it wouldn't take long to build the fund back so that there would be funds for the Phase II of the Downtown Project. Dave Hutton stated that we wouldn't be doing Phase II until 1994 after the bridge is complete. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Voxland informed Council that one of the parties involved in a tax increment district has inquired about the possibility of lowering the assessment agreement value in exchange for a cash payment or an extended term for the agreement. Consensus of Council was to not extend the term of the agreement and that staff research how a cash payment would affect other taxing jurisdictions. Sweeney/Vierling directed staff to explore the cash settlement option for Council consideration. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion ensued on the use of consultants: 1) in house for a temporary time, 2) outside when multiple expertise and equipment is needed, and 3) hiring additional employees when repeated expertise is needed. Consensus of Council was to consider the use of all three possibilities as needed. The main goal is to keep costs down. Staff can present their recommendation and rational for each situation as it arises. Mayor Laurent explained that the last time there was discussion on the recognition of volunteers, he was to look into it further and bring back additional information. He said that he has not had the time to do so and suggested that discussion on this matter be deferred to a future Committee of the Whole meeting. Councilmembers concurred. Cncl.Vierling appraised the Council of an Alternative Dispute Resolution Conference and explained that there is a committee which will settle disputes for cities. She suggested that this might be worth considering for the Murphy' s Landing/DNR situation. The information will be looked into by the Management Analyst. Mayor Laurent adjourned the meeting at 9 : 24 P.M. u4t/tG4 (1)./Y--/udith S . Cox C. y Clerk Recording Secretary -# y CITY OF SHAKOPEE BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT - MAY 1991 May 1991 May 1990 No. No. Valuation No. No. Valuation Month Y.T. D. Y.T.D. Month Y.T.D. Y.T. D. Single Family-Sewered 16 59 4 , 195, 700 6 35 2 , 232 , 100 Single Family-Septic 1 7 1, 216, 800 1 7 869 , 600 Multiple Dwellings 2 6 653 , 600 - - - (# Units) (YTD Units) (4) (12) - (-) (-) - Dwelling Additions 18 33 168 , 210 13 17 52 , 090 Other 1 6 40, 730 6 7 26, 350 New Comm. Bldgs 1 2 1, 050, 000 - 1 80, 000 Comm. Bldg. Addns. 1 1 40, 000 - 3 1, 646, 000 New Industrial-Sewered - - - 1 1 11, 972 , 000 Ind. Sewered Addns. - - - - 1 462 , 800 New Industrial-Septic - - - - - - Ind. Septic Addns. - - - - - - Accessory/Garages 7 14 77 , 590 6 14 92 , 114 Signs & Fences 12 29 54 , 822 12 33 37 , 305 Fireplaces/Wood Stoves - 1 4 , 200 1 2 7 , 340 Grading/Foundation - 2 201, 000 - 1 28 , 000 Remodeling (Res. ) 5 17 102 , 300 1 10 44 , 900 Remodeling (Inst. ) - - - - - - Remodeling (Comm/Ind. ) 5 21 1, 462 , 297 - 15 424 , 850 TOTAL TAXABLE 69 198 9 , 267 , 249 47 147 17 , 975, 449 TOTAL INSTITUTIONAL - - - - - GRAND TOTAL 69 198 9 , 267 , 249 47 147 17 , 975 , 449 No. YTD. No. YTD. Variances - 2 - 2 Conditional Use 1 4 1 2 Rezoning - 1 - - _ _ Moving - Electric 28 132 30 118 Plumbing & Heating 52 216 42 151 Razing Permits Residential - 1 - -_ Comm./Ind./Inst. - - - Total dwelling units in City after completion of all construction permitted to date 4 , 557 Jeanette Shaner Building Department Secretary CITY OF SHAKOPEE BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IN MAY, 1991 9004 Joel Fogelberg 1164 Minnesota Street Fence 2 , 000 9005 Valleyfair One Valleyfair Drive Comm. 5, 000 9006 Semmer Construction 2311 C. R. 83 Deck 800 9007 James Underwood 1115 Minnesota Court Deck 1, 200 9008 William Kallberg 1917 Heritage Drive Deck 1,300 9009 Bill Vohnoutka 328 East 2nd Avenue Garage 10, 000 9010 Michael Hayes Homes 1905 Granite Drive House 74, 500 L 1 B 4, Heritage Place 2nd 9011 Commercial Ind. Realty 1612-1616 Roundhouse Circle Twinhome 100, 000 L 5 B 1, Eagle Creek Junction 9012 Commercial Ind. Realty 1622-1626 Roundhouse Circle Twinhome 100, 000 L 4 B 1, Eagle Creek Junction 9013 John DeLacey 605 Lewis Street Remodel 10, 000 9014 Matthew Muer 768 Jefferson Street Fence 220 9015 Ries Builders 287 Marschall Road Remodel 7, 000 9016 Novak Fleck 1211 Clover Court House 68, 800 L 9/10 B 1, Meadows 4th 9017 Novak Fleck 403 Mint Circle House 65, 000 L 1 B 4, Meadows 4th 9018 Richard Fox 1064 Marschall Road Stg. Bldg. 950 9019 Charles Mallory 605 Monroe Street Deck 1, 200 9020 Kevin McGraw 422 West 5th Avenue Garage 3 , 000 9021 Thomas Leonhardt 1804 Ruby Circle Fence 600 9022 Raceway Park One Checkered Flag Blvd. Comm. 37, 500 9023 Valley Pools, Inc. 8204 Horizon Drive Pool 9 , 950 9024 Ron Thielen 1037 Tyler Street Fence 400 9025 Robert Wetherille 8583 McGuire Court Addn/Deck 10, 000 9026 Bill Henning & Co. 333 West 4th Avenue Comm. 900, 000 9027 B & D Development 2740 Jade Circle House 121, 000 L 6 B 6, Hauer' s 4th 9028 Norcutt Homes, Inc. 1290 Sapphire Lane House 71, 000 L 26 B 2 , Heritage Place 2nd 9029 Tim Sinnen 2378 Hauer Trail Deck 800 9030 Sara Raines 404 Mint Circle Fence 1, 100 9031 James Fox 1708 West 12th Avenue Garage 4 , 000 9032 David Seiberlich 1812 Ruby Circle Deck 800 9033 David Seiberlich 1812 Ruby Circle Fence 400 9034 Novak Fleck 1177 Clover Court House 55, 700 L 5/6 B 1, Meadows 4th 9035 B & D Development 1243 Limestone Drive House 87 , 000 L 9 B 3 , Hauer' s 3rd 9036 Gregory Weigold 3000 C. R. 42 Fence 200 9037 Al Reed Construction 1016 Jackson Street Addn. 25 , 000 9038 Inland Container 3900 State Hwy 101 Comm. 3 , 000 9039 H & M Builders 1104 Legion Street House 80 , 000 L 3 B 3 , Prairie Estates 9040 Rick Sames 1601 E. Shakopee Avenue Porch 12 , 500 9041 David Hamlin 1207 Minnesota Street Fence 1, 000 9042 A. L. Berkland 403 West First Avenue Sign 300 9043 New Century Const. 1900 Granite Drive House 59 , 000 L 19 B 2 , Heritage Place 9044 New Century Const. 1304 East 11th Avenue House 65, 000 L 15 B 2 , Prairie Estates 9045 Patrick Exum 223 West 8th Avenue Remodel 900 9046 Gary Waller 1004 Swift Street Addn. 27 , 000 9047 Stan Pint 1296 Jasper Road House 85, 000 L 38 B 5, Hauer' s 4th 9048 Novak Fleck 1164 Vierling Court House 62 , 000 L 9 B 1, Meadows 2nd 9049 Novak Fleck 1316 Pondview Court House 73 , 000 L 2 B 3, Meadows 2nd 9050 Dale Kes 2065 W. Vierling Drive Deck 1, 100 9051 Dave McIntosh 8362 Eagle Creek Blvd. Stg. Bldg. 700 9052 BVC Partnership 722 Garden Lane #4 Repair 6, 500 9053 Gary Turtle 132 East 1st Avenue Comm. 3 , 500 9054 Greg Triplett 1219 Minnesota Street Deck 2,600 9055 Ronald Larson 1285 Limestone Drive Deck 2 , 800 9056 N Viro Minnesota 2988 Valley View Road Sign 200 9057 Valleyfair One Valleyfair Drive Sign 3 , 000 9058 Landico, Inc. 797 Stonebrooke Drive House 310, 000 L 11 B 2 , Stonebrooke 9059 Dean Frick 1136 Clover Court Deck 1, 200 9060 Jim Sandlin 1119 Minnesota Street Deck 2 , 940 9061 John Kenfield 1969 Davis Court Deck/Fireplace 15, 000 9062 Novak Fleck 515 Mint Circle House 66, 300 L 5 B 4, Meadows 4th 9063 CCR Homes 1804 Granite Drive House 75, 000 L 15 B 2 , Heritage Place 2nd 9064 Norcutt Homes 1261 Sapphire Lane House 75, 000 L 4 B 5, Heritage Place 2nd 9065 Tim O 'Reilley 1937 East 11th Avenue Porch/Deck 4 , 500 9066 Gorco Construction 869 Spencer Street Garage 6, 000 9067 Terry Leeper 1184 Clover Court Deck 840 9068 Treva Lundquist 337 Shawnee Trail Remodel 1, 300 9069 Duane Ferguson 1513 County Road 18 Fence 500 9070 Gregory Weigold 3000 County Road 42 Stg. Bldg. 2, 700 9071 Curtis Leverson 2052 Murphy Avenue Remodel 4 , 300 9072 CertainTeed Corp. 3303 East 4th Avenue Comm. 40, 000 Total : 2,871, 100 475 MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in regular session on April 1 , 1991 at 4 : 30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room. MEMBERS PRESENT : Commissioners Cook, O' Toole and Kirchmeier. Also Liaison Wampach, Manager Van Hout and Secretary Menden. BILLS READ: City of Shakopee 20 ,032 . 00 ARA/CORY Refreshment 104 . 00 A. T. & T 10. 68 A. T . & T 42 . 55 American Safety Utility Corp 66 . 64 Auto Central Supply 71 . 31 Barry Office Products Co . 49 . 92 R.W. Beck and Associates 1 , 340 . 90 M.W. Bevins Company 64 . 17 Border States Electric Supply 3 ,860 . 65 Burmeister Electric Co . 44 . 22 City of Shakopee 2 ,381 .80 City of Shakopee 546 . 42 City of Shakopee 50 . 57 City of Shakopee 1 ,045 . 96 City of Shakopee 264 .26 City of Shakopee 2 ,755 . 74 Champion, Inc . 9 ,466 . 00 Clay' s Printing Service 71 . 00 Cy' s Amoco and Tire Center 148. 68 Davies Water Equipment Co . 390 . 97 Dick' s Conoco 5. 00 Glenwood Inglewood 9 . 50 Gopher State One-Call , Inc . 103 . 50 Graybar Electric Co. , Inc . 1 , 919 . 96 H & C Electric Supply 141 .00 H & D Electric 59 . 54 HDR Engineering 4 , 528 .07 Hennen ' s ICO 16 . 75 Leef Bros . , Inc . 22 . 64 MVA Company 488. 08 McGrann Shea Franzen Carnival Straughn and Lamb Chartered 1 ,288. 57 Metro Sales , Inc . 44 . 35 Minnegasco 726 . 84 Minn . Dept . of Public Service 11 . 25 Minn. Environmental Quality Board 312 . 91 Minn. Municipal Utilities Association 1 ,428 . 34 Minn . Valley Electric Coop. 495 . 00 Minn. Valley Testing Laboratories , Inc . 66 . 00 Motor Parts Service of Shakopee 152 . 94 Northern States Power Co . 318,050 . 06 Northern States Power Co. 332 . 32 Northern States Power Co. 764 . 10 Otter Tail Power Co. 466 . 93 E.H. Renner and Sons 4 ,272 . 00 Reynolds Welding Supply Co. 214 . 22 Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 95 .88 Shakopee Services , Inc . 43 . 46 Southwest Suburban Publishing 178. 97 Spectrum Safety Consultants , Inc . 775 . 00 Starks Cleaning Services 68 . 00 Total Tool 40 . 12 U. S . West Communications 78 . 34 Lou Van Hout 127 . 66 Water Products Co . 3 ,040 . 90 Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. 1 ,134 . 20 Woodhill Business Products 860 . 79 K-Mart Store #9638 179 . 76 Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by O 'Toole that the bills be allowed and ordered paid. Motion carried. A Communication from Northern States Power Co . regarding a refund due the Shakopee Public Utilities from a interrim rate increase was acknowledged. A communication to Judy Cox, City Clerk from Valley Green Business Park regarding replacement of an agreement regarding the watermain in an area of the Valley Indstrial Park to contain more specifics as to where the watermain will be . Liaison Wampach gave the liaison report . He will bring back to the Council a date of April 16 , 1991 for a joint meeting with the Utilities Commission. A bid tabulation was prepared by Terrill Roquette for awarding purchase of underground cable. The bid was awarded to Border State Electric as low bidder with no exceptions . Proposals were received from R.W. Beck and H.D.R . for electric long term study. Manager Van Hout will peruse the proposals and make a comparison study to be presented to the Commission for awarding of the contract . An update of the service area acquisition was given by Manager Van Hout . To date the contract has not been signed by Cooperative Power . A survey on water rates and recommendations by Manager Van Hout were given to the Commission . A discussion followed on raising water rates in the future . The Commission gave Manager Van Hout a direction as to where to derive the increased revenue from. Proposals will be drafted for the next meeting. Commissioner Kirchmeier inquired as to whether or not we can clean the water tank by Sweeney School . We will look into cleaning agents recommended for such use . The Shakopee showcase will be held on April 15 , 1991 . The Utilities will participate . There are medical meter seals available that mark houses where the occupants do have specific cases that would involve hardships were the electricity to be disconnected. There were no new plats for March, 1991 . There were three fire calls for a total of three hours and twenty minutes labor time . There were no lost time accidents for March , 1991 . The next regular meeting will be held on May 4 , 1991 in the Utilities meeting room. Motion by O' Toole , seconded by Kirchmeier to adjourn to executive session for the purpose of a wage discussion. Motion carried . Motion by O ' Toole , seconded by Kirchmeier to adjourn from executive session . Motion carried. Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Cook that the meeting be adjourned. Motion carried. LCA) /OP P Commission Secretary, Barbara Menden MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in special session on April 15 , 1991 at '4:30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Cook , O'Toole and Kirchmeier. Also present were Manager Van Hout; Andy Shea , attorney; and Kevin Favero, engineer. Commissioner Cook called the meeting to order. the purpose of the special meeting Vas to discuss the final settlememt terms with the attorney. Manager VanHout advised that Secretary Menden had posted the notice of the special meeting. Attorney Shea reviewed the agreements forming the terms of the settlement : the Stipulation of Settlement , the Supplement A to the Wholesale Electric Agreement between SPUC and NSP, and the Power Supply contract with Cooperative Power Association. Mr. Shea advised that he had signed the Stipulation of Settlement as our attorney with terms satisfactory to the Shakopee Utilities . The Supplement to the Wholesale Agreement had already been approved by SPUC at a previous meeting. Motion by Kirchmeier: to approve of the Wholesale Power Agreement with Cooperative Power Association. Seconded by O'Toole . Motion Carried. Motion by Kirchmeier: to adjourn this special meeting of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. Seconded by O'Toole. Motion Carried. b1)11) 6.1)14_ ), Commission Secret : Barbara Menden ATTEST: IVnu Rout MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in regular session on May 6 , 1991 at 4 : 30 P.M . in the Utilities meeting room . MEMBERS PRESENT : Commissioners Cock , Kirchmeier and O 'Toole . Also Liaison Wampach, Manager Van Hout and Secretary Menden . Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by O' Toole that the minutes of the March 4 , 1991 regular meeting and the March 25 , 1991 special meeting be approved as kept . Motion carried. BILLS READ: Minnesota Valley Electric Coop. 36 , 391 . 00 City of Shakopee 20 ,032 . 00 ABM Equipment Supply, Inc . 846 . 31 ARA/Cory Refreshment Services 78 . 00 Alden Pool and Municipal Supply Co. 307 . 20 American Public Power Association 2 ,156 . 34 American Test Center 1 , 200 . 00 Auto Central Supply 173 . 24 Barry Office Products Co . 207 . 40 R .W. Beck and Associates 2 ,840 . 55 Border States Electric Supply 1 , 749 . 16 C .H. Carpenter Lumber 60 . 08 Certified Laboratories 82 . 63 City of Shakopee 394 . 78 City of Shakopee 2 ,001 . 97 City of Shakopee 253 . 75 City of Shakopee 52 ,057 . 36 City of Shakopee 329 . 52 Champion , Inc . 6 , 920 . 00 Clay' s Printing Service , Inc . 249 . 10 Cooperative Power 36 , 986 . 60 DPC Industries , Inc . 1,004 . 32 Dan Routson Chevrolet 912 . 15 Davies Water Equipment Co . 121 . 75 Davies Water Equipment Co . 157 . 02 Peter L. Deutsch 75 . 39 Ditch Witch of Minnesota , Inc . 683 . 76 Business Outfitters 2,022 . 35 Don ' s Electric Forklift Services , Inc . 67 . 71 Don' s Elec-tronic Shop 31 . 45 Dorcon , Inc . 59 . 40 Ray Friedges 15.00 Glenwood Inglewood 3 . 50 Gopher State One-Call , Inc . 158 . 50 Graybar Electric Co . , Inc . 2 ,874 . 64 Hach Company 49 . 05 Hennen ' s ICO 17 . 00 Krass and Monroe Group 30 . 69 Lathrop Paint Supply Co. 37 . 66 Leef Bros . , Inc . 22 . 72 Minnesota Valley Gas 8. 25 McGrann Shea Franzen Carnival Straughn Lamb Chartered 995 . 76 Minnesota Municipal Utilities Assoc . 9,240 . 00 Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 111 . 30 Minnesota Trucking Association 47 . 49 Minnesota Safety Council 95 . 00 Minnesota Valley Testing Laboratories, Inc . 90 . 00 Motor Parts Service of Shakopee 75 . 45 Nebraska Municipal Power Pool 120 . 00 Northern States Power Co . 342 ,541 . 42 Northern States Power Co. 66 . 50 Northern States Power Co . 664 . 64 Otter Tail Power Co. 82 . 43 Pitney Bowes 100 . 50 Precision Metal Fabricators 42 . 00 Reynolds Welding Supply Co . 8 . 26 Rodack Enterprises 28 . 00 Schoell and Madson , Inc . 490 . 07 Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 221 . 00 Shakopee Services , Inc . 86 . 92 Southwest Suburban Publishing 225 . 01 Starks Cleaning Services 102 . 00 Stemmer Farm and Garden Supply, Inc . 202 . 00 System Control Services 130 . 50 T & R Service 17 . 00 Debra Thaemert 73 . 60 Total Tool 175 . 78 Transport White GMC, Inc . 150. 00 U . S . West Communications 356 . 19 United Compucred Collections , Inc . 425 . 00 Lou Van Hout 61 . 05 Viking Steel Products , Inc . 53 . 34 Vision Energy Resources 12 . 01 Voss Electric Supply Co . 22 . 39 Water Products Company 5,100 . 00 Debbie Welch 11 . 64 Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. 1 , 587 . 75 Wild Iris 36 . 00 Yarusso ' s Hardware Co . 113 . 78 Motion by O'Toole, seconded by Kirchmeier that the bills be allowed and ordered paid. Motion carried. Mr. Ralph Lenzmeier was present to discuss the sewer calculations which is based on the water consumption for the year 1991-92 . Jim Strefland from Jasper Strefland Co . was present to present the 1990 audit to the Commission . Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by O'Toole to accept the 1990 audit as presented. Motion carried . Ken Adolf , Schoell and Madson gave a report on a comprehensive plan for a water system study. A discussion followed . Quotations for two new trucks were received. Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Cook to accept the low bidder Shakopee Ford for two new trucks . Motion carried. Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by O'Toole to appoint Jim Cook as President of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission for the year 91-92 . Motion carried. There was one new plat for April , 1991 for the Meadows Fifth addition. There were six fire calls for a total man hours of five hours and 18 minutes . There were no lost time accidents for April , 1991 . The next regular meeting of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission will be held on June 3 , 1991 at 4 : 30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room. Motion by O'Toole seconded by Cook that the meeting be adjourned. Motioncarried. �! Commission Secretary, Barbara Menden fValley reel BUSINESS PARK May 28, 1991 Mr. E. Peter Gillette Commissioner DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 900 American Center Building 150 E. Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55101 Re: Business Climate in the State of Minnesota Dear Mr. Gillette: I thought I would take this opportunity to write you a letter expressing a concern in which your office may have an interest. Valley Green Business Park (previously known as Canterbury Business Park) is a business park located in Shakopee, Minnesota. We are primarily a land asset, developing land for sale to business and industry for which they then develop manufacturing, distribution and other business related facilities . We have retained the real estate brokerage services of the Welsh Companies to assist us in marketing the land to prospective users. In the process of Welsh' s marketing efforts, a major part of which is done by an organized telemarketing campaign, they have gotten feedback that concerns me and should be of great interest to your office. A variety of companies expressed little to no interest when asked about their future prospects for relocation or expansion of their manufacturing facilities and commented that, if at all possible, they would prefer not to be doing business in the State of Minnesota at all . The reasons behind their response as to discontent with doing business in Minnesota centered around the high cost of doing business, i .e. workers ' compensation expense, real estate taxes, corporate income tax, etc. The sheer expense of operating a business in the State of Minnesota appears to be making it very difficult for many businesses to generate a viable profit. We are, in our business park, experiencing a great deal of concern with two companies looking to relocate their operation to other states within the continental United States, one of which will be doing so this summer and another plans to relocate within the next five years . The loss of jobs to the community as a result of these relocations is of major concern to us inasmuch as we work so hard to attract businesses and employment to our area. 5276 Valley Industrial Boulevard South • Shakopee. Minnesota 55379 • Telephone: (612)445-9286 • Facirnile. (612) 445-9372 0 Mr. E . Peter Gillette Page Two May 28, 1991 Many of the issues that center around the high cost of doing business within the State of Minnesota are fundamental issues that require action at the State Legislative level . It is questionable, based on the recent legislative session, whether we will ever get major structural reform that can make Minnesota competitive. It concerns me that we have so many businesses contemplating leaving the State. The ability to attract new corporations and industries to the State of Minnesota has historically been dismal . If memory serves me correctly, I believe two new industries have been attracted to the State of Minnesota in the past four years . The primary expansion of our commercial/industrial employment has been generated by existing Minnesota businesses expanding their facilities and by small start-up corporations . I am sure you can appreciate our concern. We hope the Governor and our legislators will appreciate these concerns and continue to work towards creating an environment within the State of Minnesota which will promote sound economic development, attract new industries to our state, and work toward structural reform of a system that appears to work counter to the goals of sound economic development. Thank you for your interest in our concerns . Respectfully, EGREEN BUSINESS PARK c ‘ J çL R. Albinson Project Director JRA: jmcx-028 . 3 cc: Gov. Arne Carlson Rep. Becky Kelso Sen. Terry Johnston Brian Brennan - Allianz Investment Corp. U O co 00 0 m O(D M Oo O°o(D O Q to N a. O_ w.cr CO V N N 00 N-I(-OD O) ir .••I C'.) (0C)C') n<0) 00 N M NinI+MVIn V N N V(OMNVU)VO) N00 M U) V ti .-1 W III I 1 41111 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 < U 0000 W 000 0-00000000000000 N 000000WOU)O 0 00000004000M0 0. Z 000 0 00000000nNNOON00000 M 00000U)COd0 0 04000040a00000 ►4+ 000 0 000V00000U)0-(0) 00- V 0000N000 N 00U)(0000000)00 a0 • W °00(0 V O4a0NWVaNIno0O 0)N N 00000)°00-1 0) 00aWNWOVO 00M < (00..1 r ONO0ONMWNOMV M CO 00000)I$)NOO N NMN0O)N000M 00M p NOM In O.- M Va •�00.I N OVI��Way-1 N (DSC a.1.yM W V-I CO P N 040.1 U) a I °o.-+ 0 O -( I- - M -( N 1 4 M OQ 00N N 000M00000000000000 00 000000(0000 -1 00000000000M0 U. 0 000) 0) 000a000(hNNOON00000 OD 0000000)0VO 0) NOIfO1�000000U)0 O OV .0 O) MO(O•-1C).-I0U00 NO) 0 NM 0 N .40M0.4N00 -40 CO 1-4 M M In O)0)00M U)00NV•-(0 ON IN °000 .r W V 00V NVVM 00M 4 00 00 1NO-(NNVMNVM0 aa 0) OU) 00 V N N-101 (OV OOM O.' CO (D NM NNN •'•INN 0 O)-'I In CO M "NV-4M r•1V N a a a 4 .-I W T W = 000 0 000000000000000000 0 0000000000 0 000000000000 Z 000 0 000000000000000000 0 0000000000 0 000000000000 W > 000 O 000000000000 O O 0 00000 O O 0 000000000 O W 0000 00 000000000000 00 0 000000 00 00 000000000 0 K MOO U) 0000N0000U)Nln ON (0 00000 NO N 000000U)0M 0 • 0400 N OW-1V 000 Nm-( N 000000D -1V V 000010NMN N a V N 00 O) NNW N N a -4 M In VN -1 i CO 00-I 0 ^( M N N W - - .-1 N I U 0 a ei W 0 U Z 0. 4 M W W 4 W _> . F- W Z n O Z 2J II .+ 0000000000 0 M000000000004 000 In ONOM00000000000000 W 0 OON IN 0V0-•10000)0000000000 0 0000000000 0 M0(0000(000000 I—N V ON 0 0 N M .-1 to O V OO0)O)O M > U N N 0 OW 0) 00 N 0 MIn CO(O -1 0 (DO(O0 0 M ZQ -I In •-(NOU)M(DUIN N N IN WMCO(0 4C) W 0) 0) ON N 0000 Mai') M - W 4 V V N M IN V .•� N O) ..1 OC -1 ^'1 W . ..I y N D OW Z W > W W •N U) W CO W y CO w U) N 0 Z CO CO F- ~ • �Q WU W 0 Q ZU )N N X(O 0U) U N Q WM LU Z F- • 0 WW I-N W N WI-WO N r-( W Z W'-I Z W CO V)N►-I W I-10- 4 J M 0 •F- > J I.> 01- 1 0 Z W OZ WI- HWWW0 Zai-Z 6.Z 0.f f Cl) I-I C9N V) 0 4 2' WZC' 1-( W O_ 4.0 O►'1 4WHNNUZfW WWZNW COW 0 a 1"11'40.'40 XO r+ U 2 I-IZ >NWWWX>CQ Y JH 4 NSSZWI-1d'O=0.0W0-0-12dtnO 0- N4 W2Q0 40C W ►+ U.4.N0 1 WZJN Q QD. 10.X 0-000WOJWW NF- Z1-( W00 a I-Mg WNW F F-U' 0ZW1-1QY I OCb+ 04 1-1ulZZOZ 0-0_JI-(Q.JW4 •N 1 0,3 Z1- QQ • •f 2 Z WQZWYI-004.E>W CO WI= >4-1N OUQQI-IWW 4f4C0.21.6ZZ 4>0ND > OWI- W I-ID a00ZON QOO ZU >0 DQWW.-10a000=CDUOC 00 OWO . U) WOQ(lN33=1"-O > <a W<WW WOXX 4_ WN W 0 WQU_11. NF-ZZMWa2)n'I 00001 W 00W 22 < I 0 4.0WW=1Ii.0'WWW O COW JJZ CJWI-1h1Z0. CCNZ r•1 CO NWW WOO 0 > 1-1WCD000 I Z OCU 0 <44 U) WWY WO W000< Wawa •J • Z WJCOOWWJWN W WZZ CO 01-IW 1"( > \ •00 W JJ0Jp=QJSSJWOW00 0 W N<W►d1-1NNMiWZ W _141-1 •ZWWNQJ3J a -(N ZOO X mm<0QWQ1�0UJ3WWM00N 0 <0IJJ0000C74 I- --IX000(nJ4F-F- = 1-I OZ W1-10 Q QQWQ1'•1W1..1= ,WWWJNO1-O►•1 I-1 a0000aa00W Z <00ZZ_Q(n0-0 aZ 0 O 01.-1 N 00E-OJ00000G-Z3(nWCO2f0f J (nJSo-0-U)NZQC7 ` -1 00 -1NU) x N000-(NVNMVInCN00000-1 x O-NMVNMNa0 x (0Nm0 1NMVNw0a O) ZU ^INN x 000^.-4.- NMMMMMMN(000 x NNNNNMMMVtn x 000 0) MQ 000 x x MMMMMMMMMM x U)U)UllaUltra U) -I 4. M M M x M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M x M M M M M M M M M M x M MMMMMMMMMM M N I- 0 (0 (D 000 ON0.CVM (D •-1N U)00000 N0 M -1 MMN01�.-I -y M I. 0 (0 •-1 U)V U)-1 M 1`0 0 (0 00 01.0 OW -1 O M M 0((0 V N M -'1 C V V MCN--11-00 M 00 1.0000 N 0 00 00 n -1 V M-i N N --1 W O W 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 ~ 1 CC 0 00001n(n0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001.NWV a Z 000 Noo00o000000000(n000000000000000000000O0O("000u)00 1-4 000000000.10V000VMOWV0= 00WON1A•7OVWN0001.WOMOa00u)u1u1•r.-((0(0.00 2 P000•-11.00001,-0V0O-()1.-0V0V0000V.-IWNMONNONM-10VONMO-1ONN(OMNMW 00Ntn0•-1VON-OMCM NN01.00000N MI••CIAO-r.-1CN-1MOIn-1V-10000N(OMNNMV-I-IMMM O -•1 .-1.-1 ..10=0000 -1.-1 .-1 - ' M W .-1 ..1.-1 .1 .-1 .M1 .1.1t -1 M .-i.-4M N •-1 V N I .-1 F- M M 1 < 0 0J < 00000M00000000000000000000000000000000 00000U)OOMN0W LL M O o o O n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U)0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O1.O O 0 U10 0 O O►- U M 0000 0 MOW (0(0 N O N(D-IV N 000 V (D N 00 O WN /. WO U)0(D M M(0 V V 0 1-Q N .-11. N N00 •l0OVI)M U)(D U) ova) oo I.m moo U) NM 000(000( Q .•4 .-1 V N -4 N- N N V m-1.-I N M M M .-1 W.-40M -•10 m 10 .-40)11:1000)00 2 -1 -4 N 1. M .-1.-4 .-1 M M .-4.-i N M N.-4 00) C') Q N W >- W M 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Z 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > 0000 00000000 000000000000 0000000000000 000010000 0 W 0000 00000000 01.000000001-4) N01.0001.l.0000U1 0-+0N1-000 0 2 ONU)0 00000•-1 N o0-1VI.I.NNM-1.400 -1MMO(DOU1N-1..4001. MNV00000 0 • M •-1 ...4.-4001".0 N-10 V-i -1..1000 N-1..1-1C 0-1CM .-1-10-10.400 U) I- .-1 N.-4.-i.-4 .-1 U) N W p I- 0 I- CC W O U Z 0 1-1 W 2 Q i CC 2> F W Z m O 2 ZJ 1 U)O O O u)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n N V(o W m 0000Nt0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000oo1.t•V > U V (O1+ O COU) VWV0N(DM O(O -1N 0 O) -1 U)0 000VN0M1- Z4 M I.N 00 (000 MI. 00001• V-1 (V-1 V V M 1.N U)N OI.V<00(D W CO N V 1. M MM 0-1 V V -1 04-1V-40N W . 2 .„1 - 2 000•-1 N 2 0 OW 0 Z W > W 2 • I-- V) W W W LL N (A W >- << N2 LU U m J F-F 22 Z Q 0 1-100 0 Z2 y LU L W Z > J wZ'C 0 U)21- 2C< J ..J W J JEU W MO= W OZ Z 0 W1-11- I JZOZ 1-ZJ J J U2 0 JV)J >JQU WJZU aLLD N2 0 0u-0 (0000w u, zoJ .x.,_,<...1 ZO Z <(JJ JJ w<0'-4 LLQW (•� F0(/12> F-WJw4-1Q mJ(..., Q1-1 M mm'J JJ Fm F (n>W2 JF 'HW 1 W.a.el W0NI-IW ZF-woos-m 1-a>-<001.- -101--.1M<>-<<0 2)-V)0 1-OWU1-1 Q 'CO. (n'C0U V)U WY 1 W WJM Q V)W mW m1.1 <01-WW02(Wmml-1 MWF-'C 2021-1) x 21"1 xwZzz.-40UCQUJJO >WLL1-000- ..J4-20Uou)0Y 01-)WFZ OJoZ WV) >0 N z(.> 32200JIU.J 2 OZ w2 4-+M01-+COJw.ZUm•-iwuo -(Ou..000z 0JOE CI.102,- U WN m NN a(1.<020.0 J JJN JY W m1-m LLO>>N1-WW1-3V)m V)(N2m O1-2X>U)c 0NO M(AW 0 OW a1-000 0 ZVf1-1 20000<0 1.-1 CC I-WW.J 12 0 mm2H=24- 1y=> 0WM000ZWWU1-1EU>'2OZ)-2...1-/-1-1-1 JJJ-FFFFFF F- F - . 1-- 1-->. 1j } 1-+ OZ 1.11-r,OOI-.O1-<w03,1JWWaM01-10000000000w0000OOOOOOOOQOOOO►+OWWXF-1 0 =O Mou-001a1J-30a0Xaz1-owowaaaaa¢a¢a> »» r co »>1-zwww0 -4 00 MV(Of•00-1NMM0-1NM(DI.MM1.00M0--(NMVU1(Do0M0-1NMtn00M-1(OI.ODMO•-1NMU1(O(.ONMV M ZU NNNNNMMMMVVCCVCCtnnntnoc000toof0(D(0(.f.1.nni--1.00mmoo00MMMMMMM(ntn(n(n 0. DQ 0000000000000000000000M00000000000000001.11000000000000 to0tototototo0to00InNto00Intoto00toNtoIn00000to000to0to0an0000toto00000(0 -( LL (0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0M(C1(-1 M MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMM M I- .y 0 M M N U) U M r r` U) M .I N N. 0 In M —4N N N - .-I M N N W I 1 1 1 I I I 1 11 1 1 Q w 0 M 00 W 000NOOCD V 00 0 0 0_ Z Is. -I -4 000-+000 M 00 0 V 1-4 tD V V 001D V N U100 Is. OM M 0) M U) M M 0 U)IO O M IO 00 ID OW 00 f0 jU) V V 000 M N M 00.4 M U)N 4, 0) 0 N 0 0 OW Mr-- 00 4-1 .-IV 0 0) M W •"I 0 U) M..4 -1 M 00.-1 M N CO .-IN M 0 I- Q M I Q 0 I OQ .-1 N N 000NOOID Co 00 0 0 W O N 00 00 0004.4000 0 00 0 tD O 01- M U) U) Oct Q I-U)M N CO fD U) N 1-4 M U) U) i)000CC00 00 M M N Q .y et 40 001•1N000-1 -1 0 0 N w M Io- I- 00.-i M-I -I 0 0 N r -4 M M M CO CO N Q N W /.- W W 0 0 0 0000000 0 00 0 0 Z 0 0 0 0000000 0 00 0 0 W > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O U) U) U) W U) U) 0 0 In 0 0 U) 000 DD M C I- M M 0 I- V 0 -4 U)M 00 -1 • U) I- W U) "I 00 .-1 N 001• U) N I- 00 WtO M .-1 .•I N V U) N = W V /- 0 0 0 I- W W O 0 Z 0. Q M W K => 1-- w w Z D O Z ZJ I Q a w 00 0000000 0 00 0 00 W 0 -I -I -i 000000U) U) 00 0 U) P-1- > I- Z Q CC') V V 0 ON nNI 0) 01 CN') 0 W U) 0 0 0 NN N N 0 0 N W -4 N M 0 0 V 0 N N N -4 c Ow 0 Z W > W ce•I- N W N z Oz >- 1-40 1- ,--1-1 w W 0 I- N 0J W m M 0 1-I 11 1-403 Z Q W Z > 0 W 1-I 0 0 O 4.0 W 0- Z I- I- I- 0 1-4 N NOZV) N 0 Y JI- > ZOO> > CO O < <0. CC N N )- O UO O H Z Z W W C 0 N WW 0 -I Mw Z Z 0 1.-0/-Z Z 0I-- N y. ZU M M I- MI-IZ< a zZ O' W WN N lar I)- NU_ MI-W-I -J W0 W 0-4<X-1J Ia.() U- O Ow0 (w'.) 1- I- cO Ww0.W W N N > \ W C w WWI-I-WI-/0 0 ZU Z 1- 4-4F Q > > P-JZZUON N GEM Q 1-1 OZ X 0 0 Z<wOwO'-I W0. W U O U 0 U 1-I0o0wwX f 4-0 /- 0 O -I 00 4, 0 I< 00•-1NMv0 I( 00 I< M ZU * co I< -4NNNNN0) t 0-I a M 0< . CO x 00000000 000000 s MM I( .-1' y. x M ■ MMMMMMM Ia MM t 0 0N-I IDN NMOM N V.-4WMVOL0000t1100MQtDWWWN V1 Q V V 0) ts.NN 00{0 1---4N1- f` f`N.OO(V 1-(ON-In N-In N-yC CO CO-I 0•-IM M N NW O MMN MM MMCN M -I.-INNN N C)- MMIN NNMV V (V V V 0 -1 1 I W I (>- W Q U IONaoOr�•-40v000 0o In0001s0r�0000O}^+OMooWrntnto CO 0 to O O MN ^+ a Z 0r-1,-000,1000400 N 00v01.-000( 000MO•-(M•-la}ntn N 0) 0) 0 0 nlr 0 0 0 t-I 0 0 ,-- O--1 `V M o to OM1N-00(O0011)00 OOOOCOItnCUOCV00000-I0 N 0 CO0 fUn 0 N N VOMON +0O000 o CNr-.00000aV00M0005W0 - V a 0 o � - N N CO CO0 VNoO-((OVON-(VV 0 N- OM1-O0P '10.-1-1NN40. N-000O) N- co CO N N 0 W OM(O 0fD-y -1-4 0 0(V IV Mtn 0V V .-1 „y .-.1 -'1 ..-11 N N ^I N- M 01 1 Q U) 0 J Q V0NOMMOW000 N 0.4.-1NMOMOONO-40)01-.040-+00' V to to 0 0 M0 a 0 LI.. 0 MNN0-11-0^4000 t, MVtnVN000o0.-1V 0000(000O(.!' 1- 0 0 0 0 I-ry 0 0 0 O O0 VOM 01+ NaVU) n 0)0VM1r0)00001-(V00-(V-10(ON to n N- (n F-1-4c (DON 1+-I 000 C) CO N---I.-I It)CO (0 U 0(00)C) 0 0)0 M MO COO) to 0 0 OV 0 Q to NO .-10 00..0J000..0J00 VV MI-N-y0 -"IV-(CO(0 1r0"" -IV I N-yU 0 M M . . 000a COOIn00-'I c0(0 VM^-(oo (ONoOO NV n r ••1 '-1 o: O to V y-y N M (0-i M CO CO M-(V V N M M to(O 00 N .-i.-10.1 . Q - W .I >-Z OM 00000000000 0 00000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 1- 00000000000 0 00000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 H U)0000000000 to 00000000000000000000 to 0 0 .0 0 to U) W tnV000000VU)0 0 W00000UO00V000NMU)000 CO CO 0o 0 0 N N M ONNOVIONMNO V 00..•yM0000OC^4 0001-01-0M0 0 0 0 U) In N N C U)1-O•-IO-(OVNM0 r 1..--I(O01-U01 -+M010.1 0 0“-4 0V0(OO(O N In U N N M MV-I V0-+ (O0 0 -IMMV1-00 N-IMNOVN- -4 ...40 0 04a 0) ('3 -- -( r --+ N .-4 In to N N Q • N -I -I I- 1-- W 0 a 0 a W W 0 Z CC Q M re Q } W _> ) m D Z F- 0 H gJ 1 Q C.100nOme.10a000 0 0(OOMIr0 M0-IOV000000a0N M N N 0 0 O0 0 0 0M N0•N0V0ON--100 n 0ONV-000 N M l-0)to O1-0-r0NV O) M M 0 0 ON N 0 0 f-F- to 0 Z U 000 VM OVttU) r NNV(ONC) OO--I(r0V0 (Ot-inC)ON M V V 0 0 V V ZQ MOM M0 000M CO 0N0-IMVV--1-♦0)000 OVI-U OU) CO W 02(0(0 t..a MOV(0 M 000)N N--((O c000000 1-0 Ntn-I(V co V V V V W a N Va-IN O)(OM --IN-'I M 0V C)-( --I U) M M --1 -4 a N N(O O r` O M O -I --I tr V -I -y co X -I CC W D OZ 0 N F- M a a 0 CC CL. CL. Q N WW 1- Z • N ZZ < WU 0 QQ N WF- WZ JN WW 1-•I N) W N Q 1-IW ZZ 00 W CC C 0 XX w006. N ()CO a >0 WO Mb-40 Z F- a J7 W a-W aM UN W OZ 1-F-a <NI-(0 0 QJ •C WW oa (U. > LU 0 Z H I-I H (n a a Z Z 0 LL� JJWa QWMWaO > K•aZea JC7 OM . 0 N 0.. Z tY Y JF- JJF-I U00U.X I- a W N Y T < Qa MM W I-II-IWI-'IOZ W F-NQF-ZQZ 0 NNWO = a 0- W 0 0 S aM ta_II 1 fI tt-lL I JUW N Ita NF-0JZ WN WV) UOMZ W W F- N X 0 Z Z N ZwceU ii I 1 1 1 > �W ,y,.,0 Z.2iCDUW ZOO< N I Z C < Z W W ZU (nWLW ZZZ 10 J N �ZQQ W WO W�WE ZZZ ZO < WWI+-r-IMUNW1-.0=_.1.<,- a'.jjQJ N- < Q Z U. ~ H Z Z 0 0W 1-INMN OOOSWJ Z -.< 0 aaceF- ...F-fa 0 JQa'oa WJOQaWF-O:aoW SW J 1- 1- < N w(n F- . H >- \ Qa.a'QNIInJX N au_OJ•.-iwai -W>ZOJF-IiNUU O. a a X Z WW t-+ 1- 1- F- -4 F- JLUJWa'ZZ1< Lu 0 0. NNn<0(DONJQI-INNZZWKIn a a a m < JX I Z Z a OZ Q>Q>WWWWWOZ W 000OQ'Wa'Wa'OWCCZF-WOOW►-I O < Q W a' QQ W 0 0 O O NONOaaaaS30 a InInXmI(naJaa►-ral-+OZ - 0UOff 0 0 0 a F 1- w 0 0 -4 0U 0N0 40.-IN MO-I(V . 0 U)(vO N.l0(000-+000000-(to 0 * -a II 0 x -(N x -( . 0) ZU O-(MMVVVVNtn to * NNNNNNMMMMMMMMMMMMMV s to • 1- . 00 • 0 -4- Q U. V VV VefVV VV VV t 'CVVVVVVV VV VVVVVVQVV V w V t V . VV +t V . N I- U rn a w C) CD W Q U o0 a z v CC I-I - an a co O N 0) W 0 � a.1 H ►� C., (7 I Q In p J Q N Li- 0 a O OI- U C. V) h-Q CO CCaro Q a w -I >-z O M O I- O M In Q' O) O. 0 - d In d Ir) - 0 U a 0 O. W W U z M Lr W S> IX I- M Z I- O ►-I X J Q O) O N Z Q n W W - 0. C /r co X N LU C)Z 0 w I- a 0 cc IL a Q N J O Q W Z I- a �z0 0 O I-+ Q Q a z S d'M Cl) W Z U lL W N O CD W } O I- I-1 O Z U 0 -• 0 C) ZO 0) �Q - 4. SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY 2330 Sioux Trail NW., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 Tribal Office (612) 445.8900 FAX: (612) 445-8906 AllANNS/0 PNrOHOFFICERS argi FOE ` LEONARD PRESCOTT ,`r Chairperson ) �� jUN 21991 ALLENE ROSS ( �J , Vice Chairperson F ` uQE MELVIN CAMPBELL SR. } ( CITY oL 5• ��� Secretary/Treasurer I V r June 10, 1991 City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Sirs: We are happy to announce the appointment of Michael N. Felix to the position of Governmental Affairs Representative for the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community. Mr. Felix brings considerable professional experience to the community. In addition to having degrees in Economics and Urban Planning, Mr. Felix brings more than fifteen years of planning and consulting experience to this position. He has dealt with most of the agencies at the State and local level and has many friends at these organizations which.will be helpful to this position. Please feel free to call Mike at the community. Sincerely, /} dae,v-1/4-1 // Z,aZS`J r; Leonard Prescott Tribal Chairman LP/rys Pt-7 TENTATIVE AGENDA Energy & Transportation Committee Shakopee, Minnesota 7 : 00 P.M. June 19 , 1991 Chairman Drees Presiding: 1. Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M. 2 . Approval of Minutes - May 15, 1991 3 . Vanpool Fare Increase - S.A.T. Policy #20 4 . D-A-R Service Expansion 5 . Dial-A-Ride Operational Issues 6. Opt Out Legislation 7 . Informational Items: a. Recycling Monthly report b. Dial-A-Ride Monthly Report c. Dial-A-Ride Saturday Service Report d. Van Pool Monthly Report e. Business Update from City Hall f. Dial-A-Ride Performance Guidelines g. Transit Brochure - Verbal h. County Grant Request - Verbal 8 . Other business a. Next Meeting - b. City Board and Commissions Picnic - Lions Park - Monday, July 15th - 6:00 p.m. 9 . Adjournment Barry A. Stock Assistant Administrator CITY OF SHAKOPEE /C Minutes of the Energy and Transportation Committee Regular Session May 15, 1991 Chairman Drees called the meeting to order at 7 : 00 p.m. with Commissioners Otto, Drees, Stolarcek, Case, Ward and Kelly present. Commissioners Roman, Mars and Reinke were absent. Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator and Linda Hagen, Shakopee Workplace were also present. Stolarcek/Case moved to approve the minutes of the March 20, 1991 meeting as kept. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock noted that the City of Shakopee has been participating with the Regional Transit Board in a demonstration project at the Workplace. Mr. Stock explained that the Workplace is a training center for the developmentally disabled. The intent of the demonstration project was to train the developmentally disabled to utilize the Dial-A-Ride program. Throughout the demonstration project, the Regional Transit Board covered the cost of the rides provided by Dial-A-Ride. Mr. Stock noted that monthly ridership from the Workplace has ranged between 60 and 120 passenger trips per month. The demonstration project expires on May 31, 1991. Mr. Stock shared with the Committee a correspondence that was received from Ms. Eileen Moran, Director of Scott County Human Services, requesting the City to consider adopting a new fare category for the developmentally disabled. Ms. Moran proposed a fare of 250 per trip. Mr. Stock stated that he has several concerns regarding Ms. Moran' s proposal. First, the Regional Transit Board has a Farebox Recovery Ratio Policy that the City must adhere to. Mr. Stock noted that he has contacted the Regional Transit Board and they have stated a willingness to consider excluding passenger trips from the Workplace and subsequent costs from the Farebox Recovery Ratio standards. Mr. Stock stated that his second concern revolved around the definition of developmentally disabled, as compared to handicapped. Mr. Stock stated that he felt the difference between the two could simply be defined as mental disability verses physical disability. Mr. Stock stated that the Shakopee Dial-A-Ride program does provide handicapped service for the physically disabled with a 24 hour advanced notice. The fare for the physically handicapped conforms to our standard fare structure. (No pricing incentive. ) Commissioner Stolarcek questioned the objective of the Workplace in training the developmentally disabled. Ms. Hagen explained that it Minutes of the Page - 2 Energy and Transportation Committee May 15, 1991 is the desire of the Workplace to train the developmentally disabled so that they can hold down a regular paying job. Ms. Hagen stated that the vast majority of the Workplace clients earn well below minimum wage. She stated that many of these persons simply cannot afford the regular Dial-A-Ride fare. She also stated that this is their only means of transportation. Commissioner Kelly stated that individuals that we are talking about and their ability to pay is substantially less than the vast majority of our regular riders. He stated that he would be willing to propose a fare of 100 per passenger trip for the developmentally disabled. Mr. Stock stated that adopting a fare category on the ability to pay issue could be bad precedent. Mr. Stock noted that perhaps there are other residents in the community that are in the same predicament as the Workplace clients in terms of ability to pay. Mr. Stock stated that in lieu of creating a new fare category, he favored extending the demonstration project. Commissioner Stolarcek stated that she would also support extending the demonstration project through 1991 providing that the Workplace clients be subject to paying some kind of fare. She stated that she felt that it would be beneficial in terms of self esteem if the Workplace clients had to pay a fare. This would also serve as another training opportunity for the Workplace clients in terms of trying to mainstream them. Kelly/Stolarcek moved to continue the Dial-A-Ride demonstration project at the Workplace through December 31, 1991 with the Workplace patrons subject to a 100 per ride fare with a 24 hour notice beginning June 1, 1991. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock explained that in the fall of 1984, the City of Shakopee replaced the MTC service with its own transit program. One element of this program which served to replace the express bus service, provided for a Vanpool Program. The initial fare established for the vanpool program coincided with the MTC express fare that was being applied prior to the City of Shakopee ' s opting out. The fare was $1. 25 per passenger trip. Up until this year neither the City of Shakopee or the MTC have had a fare increase. Meanwhile, actual operating costs for the vanpool program have increased by nearly 60%. At the same time, the farebox recovery ratio for the vanpool program has fell well below the 15% Regional Transit Board standard. In fact, in 1990 the farebox recovery ratio for the vanpool program was less than 10%. Conversely, the City of Shakopee subsidy per passenger trip for the vanpool program has increased dramatically. Mr. Stock explained that the Regional Transit Board does not apply their farebox recovery ratio independently to the vanpool and Dial-A-Ride programs. The City is fortunate in this respect. Minutes of the Page - 3 Energy and Transportation Committee May 15, 1991 Mr. Stock noted that on March 1, 1991 the MTC increased their express route daily fare by 35¢ per passenger trip. Fares were also increased for weekly and monthly passes but were much smaller in terms of the percentage increase as compared to the daily fare. Mr. Stock stated that he would like to propose that a public hearing be scheduled by the Energy and Transportation Committee to solicit comments on a proposed Vanpool fare increase. Mr. Stock stated that he would like to propose that the Shakopee Area Transit Vanpool fare be increased by 25¢ per passenger trip (from $1. 25 to $1. 50) and that the monthly fare be increased from $47 . 50 to $52 . 00 . Mr. Stock stated that the $52 . 00 level would correspond to the MTC monthly bus pass. Chairman Drees noted that the Vanpool riders are expecting a fare increase. He stated that the vast majority of the riders are aware that the MTC increased their fares on March 1 and that the City has not had an increase since 1984 . Mr. Stock stated that it would be up to the Energy and Transportation Committee to determine the level of the proposed fare increase, if any, and when it should be implemented. Mr. Stock questioned when the Committee would like to have a public hearing to solicit comments on the proposed Vanpool fare increase. Commissioner Ward stated that she felt that there would be little opposition to the fare increase and that it would be appropriate for the Committee to schedule the public hearing to coincide with their next regularly scheduled meeting date. Ward/Stolarcek moved to request staff to schedule a public hearing to solicit comments from Shakopee residents regarding a proposed Vanpool fare increase to coincide with the Energy and Transportation Committee' s next regularly scheduled meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock then shared with the Committee operating statistics from the various opt-out communities. Mr. Stock explained funding sources for the Shakopee Area Transit Program. He noted that the majority of the transit funding comes from the transit taxing district. In the past, the City has also been eligible for HACA funds. Mr. Stock noted that the Regional Transit Board staff have made a new interpretation of the opt-out legislation which states that the City is no longer eligible to receive HACA funding. Mr. Stock noted that Representative Kelso has proposed legislation to clarify language in the opt-out legislation regarding the availability of funds for opt-out systems. Mr. Stock noted that if the Regional Transit Board' s new interpretation is correct, the City is at risk of loosing nearly $38 , 000 of HACA assistance in 1992 . Mr. Stock noted that the 1991 budget for transit is $235, 000 . In 1991 the transit taxing district is expected to generate $215, 000 of funds. In 1991, the City will be eligible to receive the $38 , 000 in HACA funding. Therefore, there are adequate funds to continue existing transit operation levels through 1991. Mr. Stock stated that generally the transit taxing district proceeds increase by 10% annually. If he is accurate in his projection, there will be Minutes of the Page - 4 Energy and Transportation Committee May 15, 1991 approximately $235, 000 of transit district funds available in 1992 . This would put the City right at the threshold level in terms of available funding versus projected program costs. Discussion ensued on cuts that could be made in service if there are not adequate funds available. Mr. Stock noted that there are numerous options available where the City could reduce costs in the provision of transit service, including Saturday Dial-A-Ride service and weekday evening service. The City could also elect to eliminate the Vanpool Program and go to a fixed route express service. Mr. Stock stated that he just wanted to bring this information to the attention of the Committee so that they are not surprised if we have to modify service levels in 1992 . Commissioner Stolarcek stated that perhaps we should give serious consideration to establishing a fixed route Dial-A-Ride service with the Southwest Metro Service Area rather than continuing to provide limited Dial-A-Ride service. Mr. Stock stated that he has had conversations with the Southwest Metro manager in regard to this issue and that they are also interested in pursuing this option. Mr. Stock reviewed the revenue and expenditures associated with the 1991 recycling day. Mr. Stock stated that he felt the program was a tremendous success. Mr. Stock noted that City Council directed staff to attempt to pull the program off in 1991 at a break even for the City of Shakopee. Mr. Stock stated that 1991 program will actually end up costing the City of Shakopee approximately $900. 00. Mr. Stock stated that in designing the 1991 program certain levels of service had to be reduced in order to save on cost. These reductions resulted in generally a 2 hour wait to dispose of refuse at the collection site. Even though numerous people had to wait in line for over 2 hours, Mr. Stock stated that he did not receive any phone calls from persons who wanted to complain about the program. Most people realize that the City was offering a tremendous service at a substantially reduced cost than what would be applied at the landfill. Finally, Mr. Stock noted that he has received notification from Scott County that they are applying for another grant that would provide funding for a similar cleanup program in 1992 and 1993 . Mr. Stock requested the Energy and Transportation Committee to make a recommendation to City Council that the program be continued in 1992 and that $2 , 000 be included in the 1992 budget to offset City related costs in providing the collection program. Commissioner Ward stated that she thought the program was a tremendous asset for Shakopee residents and that the City would receive flack if the program is discontinued. Discussion ensued on whether or not a limit should be set on the number of tires dropped off. Mr. Stock stated that since the County is providing funding for the disposal of the tires, he did not feel that a limit on the number of tires needed to be set. Mr. Stock stated that the City did have a volume limit in place by stating that no vehicles could enter the cleanup site that were larger than a pickup or a trailer. Minutes of the Page - 5 Energy and Transportation Committee May 15, 1991 Mr. Stock stated that perhaps some limit should be placed on the size of the trailer. Ward/Otto moved to recommend to City Council that $2 , 000 be included in the 1992 budget for a City Cleanup Program. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock explained that the Dial-A-Ride contract has a three year extension provision. He noted that the initial three year contract expires in March of 1992 . Mr. Stock noted that he has met with the transit managers from Southwest Metro and Plymouth to discuss mutual concerns regarding the provision of Dial-A-Ride service. Mr. Stock shared with the Committee a list of concerns that he had. Mr. Stock noted that the majority of the concerns were directly related to dispatching. He noted that at the present time dispatching for Shakopee, Southwest Metro and Plymouth is all being handled from one central dispatching facility. Mr. Stock stated that he felt there are not enough dispatchers and that centralized dispatching has created confusion for the dispatchers. Discussion ensued on several problems that residents have been experiencing with Dial-A-Ride. It was the consensus of the Committee that dispatching did seem to be the biggest problem. Consistent dissemination of information by the dispatchers and the drivers also seem to be a problem. Access to the vehicles by Seniors was also cited as a problem to discuss with National School Bus management. Mr. Stock then reviewed the Dial-A-Ride and Vanpool monthly reports. Chairman Drees questioned what percent of the waste stream was diverted from the landfill through the City' s recycling program in 1990 . Mr. Stock stated that he would attempt to have this information for the Committee at their next meeting. Mr. Stock stated that he estimated that it was approximately 15%. Stolarcek/Otto moved to adjourn the meeting at 8: 15 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Barry A. Stock, Recording Secretary If Note Meeting Time: 5: 30 P.M. TENTATIVE AGENDA Community Development Commission City Hall Council Chambers Wednesday, June 19 , 1991 1. Call to Order at 5: 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of the Minutes - April 17 , 1991 3 . Economic Development Update a. Valley Racquetball Club b. 4 . Action: Residential Development Incentive Policy 5 . Subcommittee Report a. Transportation Coalition (Verbal) b. Housing Assistance (Verbal) c. Municipal Facility Task Force Minutes d. Scott County Economic Development Coalition Minutes 6. Informational Items a. Business Update from City Hall b. Scott County Economic Development Coalition (verbal) c. April Building Activity Report d. May Building Activity Report e. City Brochure Update f. City Board & Commission Picnic - Monday, July 15th 6: 00 p.m. - Lions Park 7 . Other Business a. Next Meeting - b. 8 . Adjournment Please call Barry or Aggie at 445-3650 if you cannot make the meeting. Minutes of the Shakopee Community Development Commission City Council Chambers April 17 , 1991 Chairman Albinson called the meeting to order at 5:40 P.M. with the following members present: Mike Pennington, Charles Brandmire, Mike Beard, Bill Mars, Jon Albinson and Mark Miller. Commissioner DuBois was absent. Barry Stock, Assistant City Administrator, Greg Smith, Chamber of Commerce Liaison and Ted Jasper were also present. Mars/Pennington moved to approve the minutes of the March 20, 1991 meeting as kept. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock gave a brief economic development report stating that two residential plats are currently being processed, including Meadows 5th - 38 lots and Weinandt' s - 24 lots. Mr. Stock commented that industrial inquiries have been minimal. Mr. Stock stated that at the last meeting of the Community Development Commission, it was suggested that staff attempt to tighten up the program guidelines in the proposed Residential Development Incentive Policy. Mr. Stock noted that he had made several changes to the program in an effort to specifically address eligibility criteria that the HRA and City can use to determine which projects are eligible for assistance. Mr. Stock noted that he also included language that specifically addressed what constitutes blight in terms of the proposed program. Mr. Stock noted that the program, as presently proposed, provides two types of financing. The first type utilizing the HRA fund balance is entitled Municipal Assistance. The second funding source would be traditional Tax Increment Financing. In both cases, certain criteria would have to be met by project applicants. Mr. Stock noted that the primary objective of the Municipal Assistance Program is to encourage small scale residential development project (less than 25 units) which would not have otherwise occurred without financial assistance. Traditional Tax Increment Financing would be utilized when more than 25 units of residential development are proposed. Projects pursuing Traditional Tax Increment Financing would also have to meet the state criteria specifying that said housing to be developed would have to be made available for low and moderate income families. The Municipal Assistance Program does not include such language. Another difference between the two funding sources is that the Municipal Assistance Program only provides the amount of tax increment generated by the City portion of the tax statement. Minutes of the Page - 2 Community Development Commission April 17, 1991 Under Traditional Tax Increment Financing, all three of the major taxing jurisdictions are generally captured and remitted to the developer or utilized to retire bond payments. Mr. Stock shared with the Committee an example of how both programs might work on the recently proposed Jasper Project. Mr. Stock noted that under the Municipal Financing Program as proposed, none of the current taxing jurisdictions would be deprived of any tax base. The City portion of the tax bill would simply be utilized to determine the level of grant assistance (utilizing the HRA fund balance) that would be distributed to the developer. Mr. Stock noted that the program, as proposed, provides financial assistance on a pay as you go basis. In other words, the applicant would not receive funding until the property taxes are paid. Chairman Albinson stated that this generally works okay for large industrial projects since they generally stay under one ownership. However, in the case of a residential development project, he stated that the individual properties would be sold off and that many different persons might end up paying the taxes on the project. Mr. Albinson stated that he did not see a problem with providing the developer with cash up front, providing the developer supplied a revokable letter of credit in an amount equal to the grant or assistance amount. Mr. Stock questioned how long the City would retain the letter of credit. Mr. Albinson stated that he felt the City would only have to retain the letter of credit until such time that all of the residential units as proposed were completed. Mr. Stock stated that he felt that the letter of credit could be released upon the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Permits for all residential units as proposed by the developer. It was the consensus of the Commission that the program guidelines should be amended to include language providing for cash up front to projects receiving assistance under the proposed program, providing the developer provide the City with an irrevocable letter of credit in an amount equal to the grant or tax increment assistance. Commissioner Miller stated that the CDC has proposed programs in the past that are taking a portion of the HRA fund balance. He questioned how much money was available for this type of program and how much needs to be made available under the Municipal Financing option. Mr. Stock stated that he could not be sure of how much is actually available in the HRA fund balance at this time. He noted that the HRA will be acquiring some property near the 5th Ave. project area. Mr. Stock stated that there might be between $25, 000 and $50, 000 available for this type of program. Commissioner Miller asked staff to give their opinion on how many potential projects there are in the City that could utilize the Municipal Financing option. Mr. Stock stated that given the strict Minutes of the Page - 3 Community Development commission April 17 , 1991 blight criteria, he did not believe there were a large amount of projects within the community that could qualify under the Municipal Financing option. He stated that, in his opinion, the total amount of eligible projects could be as low as $25, 000 or as high as $100 , 000 depending on the density of the project. Mr. Stock stated that the program guidelines do not specify that at all times does the HRA have to provide up to five years of assistance. The amount of assistance could be less if the development costs do not justify providing more assistance than what is actually needed. Chairman Albinson questioned how the HRA replenishes their fund balance. Mr. Stock stated that the HRA does have a small mill levy authority that generates approximately $30, 000 per year in funds for the HRA fund. Mr. Stock reminded the Commission that assistance under the Municipal Financing option in the residential development program is passed on to the developer as a grant. Mr. Brandmire stated that any project receiving assistance under this program would generate new tax base for the City and the HRA. He stated that he felt that the purpose and mission of the HRA was to stimulate development projects that would not have otherwise occurred without City assistance and to eliminate blight. Commissioner Brandmire stated that extraordinary development costs and soil conditions were not listed as a program goal and that he felt it should be included. He suggested that Item #8 be modified to include language addressing extraordinary development costs. It was the consensus of the Commission that Goal #8 should be amended accordingly. Chairman Albinson questioned whether or not an Assessment Agreement would be required in conjunction with the Developer' s Agreement. Mr. Stock stated that a Developer' s Agreement would not be required. Mr. Stock noted that Assessment Agreements are only required when bonds are sold. Mr. Stock stated that generally, the Developer's Agreement does address a minimum value on a specified date. Beard/Brandmire moved to recommend to the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority that the Housing Assistance Program Guidelines be approved as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Miller questioned whether or not it would be appropriate to address a set aside dollar amount for potential program applicants. Chairman Albinson stated that the Committee did recommend that a certain amount of dollars be set aside when they propose the Downtown Rehab Grant Program. Miller/Brandmire moved to present the Housing Assistance Program to the HRA with initial funding allocation in the amount of $30, 000 to be applied to the program. Motion carried unanimously. Minutes of the Page - 4 Community Development Commission April 17, 1991 Mr. Stock stated that Mr. Jasper has submitted a residential development proposal. Mr. Stock stated that he felt Mr. Jasper' s proposal met the development criteria and blight test established in the proposed Residential Development Program. Mr. Stock stated that due to the unusual soil conditions in the project area, Mr. Jasper is faced with extraordinary developer' s cost in terms of providing City water and sewer service to each of the proposed residential units. Mr. Stock stated that the layout of Mr. Jasper' s residential development project (condominium or townhouse) will determine how many service wyes he can use to service the residential units. Mr. Stock stated that service wyes has been a controversial issue lately and that he cannot be certain as to what the City of Shakopee or Shakopee Public Utility Commission may require in conjunction with Mr. Jasper' s project. Mr. Jasper stated that he felt he only needed to run one service line to service the individual units. In terms of sewer, Mr. Jasper stated that he did not know why a four-plex could be serviced by one common sewer line. He stated that he thought it was ridiculous to require four separate sewer lines for a four- plex. Mr. Stock stated that this is an issue that the CDC does not have to resolve. Mr. Stock noted that it is a City Council policy decision and that the policy is being drafted at this time and that the type of home ownership involved generally dictates how sewer and water service lines are installed. Mr. Miller stated that as with past programs that the CDC has recommended to the City Council and/or HRA for consideration, persons have been waiting in the wings to utilize them. He noted that since Mr. Jasper' s proposal does meet the criteria as set forth, he would feel comfortable recommending HRA approval of Municipal Financing Assistance for Mr. Jasper' s project. Mr. Miller questioned Mr. Jasper on what he thought of the proposed program. Mr. Jasper stated that if the City ' s policy on service wyes cannot be flexible, even with the level of assistance provided under the proposed Municipal Assistance Program, he did not feel his project would be worthy of pursuing. Miller/Beard moved to go on record in support of Mr. Jasper's proposed residential project under the proposed Municipal Financing Assistance option as addressed in the proposed Residential Development Incentive Policy. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock stated that the Downtown Committee is recommending that the Community Development Commission recommend to City Council that a consultant be hired to complete an update of the Downtown Revitalization Plan. Mr. Stock noted that the Downtown Revitalization Plan was completed in 1984 . Mr. Stock noted that the currently proposed Comprehensive Plan does call for updating of Minutes of the Page - 5 Community Development Commission April 17 , 1991 the Downtown Revitalization Plan in either 1991 or 1992 . Mr. Stock reviewed with the Commission a list of tasks that the Downtown Committee would like the consultant to analyze. Mr. Stock noted that many of the tasks are addressed in the Star City One-Year Work Plan. Commissioner Miller commented on the back sides of the buildings in the City Hall block. He questioned whether or not the existing Downtown Grant Program could be utilized by the property owners to clean up the backs of these buildings. Mr. Stock responded in the affirmative. Mr. Stock stated that the Downtown Committee felt that a consultant could do a conceptual rendering of what the back sides of these buildings could look like if they were restored or slightly modified. Mr. Miller stated that he felt that it was a good idea to bring in a consultant to look at options. Mr. Miller questioned if the Downtown Committee considered getting assistance from graduate schools to perform some conceptual designs. Mr. Stock stated that back in 1983 the City did have the assistance from the U of M. in preparing some architectural renderings on some of the historical buildings in downtown Shakopee. Mr. Stock stated that he did send a letter to the University of Minnesota School of Architecture requesting assistance on doing a similar project for the rear sides of the buildings on 1st Ave. in the downtown area. To date, no response has been received. Commissioner Miller suggested that perhaps staff could expand the list of schools contacted and perhaps utilize different programs from universities, such as geography, planning and/or public administration. Mr. Stock stated that this could be easily accomplished. Miller/Brandmire moved to request staff to seek further outside assistance from college universities in Minnesota to develop a conceptual and/or planning analysis of the downtown area. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Brandmire commented on one of the work tasks that specified the need for residential development within the downtown area. Mr. Brandmire stated that he did not think residential development should be permitted in the downtown area. Mr. Brandmire went on to state that it was important for the consultant to address the development of a consistent theme in the downtown area. It was the consensus of the Committee that the theme concept was a good one. Chairman Albinson questioned whether or not Mr. Brandmire' s concern regarding residential development could be addressed by amending work task #2 to read "determine the potential economic demand for various businesses and new residential development within the downtown area" . Commissioner Brandmire responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Pennington questioned whether or not the consultant would analyze alternative design plans for the downtown area and various themes. Mr. Stock responded in the affirmative. Mr. Stock Minutes of the _ Community Development Commission Page 6 April 17, 1991 suggested that if City Council does approve hiring a consultant that the City could solicit proposals and the CDC and/or Downtown Committee could interview the consultants to obtain a better understanding of the consultants vision and previous work. It was the consensus that this was an excellent idea. Discussion ensured on the funding source for this type of study. Mr. Stock stated that the Downtown Committee is recommending that the CDC recommend to City Council that the funds generated from the sale of the parking lots be utilized to offset the cost of the study. Mr. Stock noted that he does not know when Mn DOT will actually acquire the parking lots. Commissioner Albinson suggested that perhaps the Downtown Committee 's recommendation could be amended to initiate soliciting proposals from a consultant following Mn DOT ' s acquisition of the parking lots. It was the consensus of the Commission that they felt a recommendation should be made to City Council at this time to stress the importance and need for a Downtown Revitalization Plan update. However, they also thought it was prudent, given the City' s financial condition that no study be initiated until the City actually receives the funds from the sale of the parking lots. Brandmire/Mars moved to recommend to City Council that the City of Shakopee obtain proposals for updating the Downtown Revitalization Plan, following Mn DOT's acquisition of the parking lots located behind City Hall . Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock reviewed the City Map layout with the Commissioners. Commissioner Brandmire commented on the lack of information on trails. Mr. Stock stated that the City Parks and Trail Systems would be set out as a different color on the final map. Commissioner Brandmire commented on whether or not the major recreational facilities could be identified on the final map. Mr. Stock responded in the affirmative. Mr. Stock also noted that the ticket offices of the major tourist attractions could also be included on the telephone number listing. Beard/Pennington moved to request staff to proceed in completing the City Map/Brochure. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock briefly commented on the Athletic Facilities findings and Council ' s decision to create a committee to investigate the municipal need for space in the proposed moratorium area. Mr. Stock also noted that a Chamber Industrial Session has been set for April 30, 1991, 4 : 30 to 7: 30 at Canterbury Inn. Mr. Stock noted that he is presently having someone from staff analyze the number of available residential lots within the MUSA line. Mr. Stock stated that he is concerned that we may run out of developable lots in the near future and that we should consider Minutes of the Page - 7 Community Development Commission April 17 , 1991 taking the necessary steps to expand the MUSA line. Mr. Stock stated that he hoped to have some inventory results by our next meeting. Beard/Brandmire moved to adjourn the meeting at 7 : 20 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF BOARD OF REVIEW REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 14 , 1991 Councilman Sweeney called the meeting to order at 7 : 00 p.m. with Board members Dick Marks, Eldon Reinke, Councilman Steve Clay and Councilwoman Gloria Vierling present. Also present were Bob Schmitt, from the Scott County Assessor' s Office; Dennis Kraft, City Administrator; and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk. Vierling/Marks moved to elect Robert Sweeney as Board of Review Chairman for 1991. Vierling/Clay moved to close nominations and that a unanimous ballot be cast for Robert Sweeney for 1991 Chairman. Motion carried unanimously. Chairman Sweeney acknowledged that the purpose of the Board of Review (included in the agenda packet) was previously read by all Board Members. Mr. Schmitt stated that the only valuation increases are for the 25% of the community which was due for inspection and adjustments. Cncl . Vierling asked if Bob is only looking at 25% of the property, is the other 75% of properties going to be raised the same percentage wise, or will that only happen every fourth year. Mr. Schmitt responded that of the 25% of the community viewed this year, the only value increases will basically be for things that were added since last time they were viewed; i.e. finished basements, decks, additions which were completed without a building permit. He said that if a set increase were applied to all properties in the 25% area, than properties already valued for finished basements, decks, and additions would be valued higher than similar properties in the same area. Mr. Schmitt explained that there is going to be a small discrepency between the 25% viewed and the 75% not viewed but it isn't going to be major, because the rates that are applied for the square footage of homes are the same throughout the town. If rates are changed, they are changed throughout 100% of the town, whether it is for a house, deck, garage, or whatever. When rates are changed, they go through 100% . In summary, Mr. Schmitt stated that the only increases in property values are for additional things that are found. It isn't a big issue. He won't apply it across the board, because it isn't fair. Cncl . Sweeney asked for clarification stating that the 75% who were not viewed this year, absent some building permit, would then not have an increase in valuation. Mr. Schmitt concurred, unless there was a change for lots or rates they would. BOARD OF REVIEW MAY 14, 1991 PAGE 2 Cncl. Vierling asked that if the state mandated an increase, would it go across for everyone in addition to the 25%. Mr. Schmitt concurred that it would. Cncl. Clay stated that he feels that valuations of property have not increased very much in the past few years. Mr. Schmitt said that some of the properties have gone down in value. Mr. Schmitt said that the questions from Glen M. Theis, 9011 Boiling Springs Lane, PID #27-913-043-0 have been settled. Mr. Schmitt said he received information yesterday that the Backstretch RV Park PID #27-126-001-0 is contesting their valuation. He explained that he just received their income information but has not yet had the opportunity to review it. He wants their property to be part of the record so that they can appeal to the County Board. Vierling/Clay moved to support County Assessors estimated market value for PID #27-126-001-0 (Backstretch RV Park) . Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Schmitt explained that Arlo Johnson, Budget Host Motel, 1181 East 1st Avenue, PID #27-075-001-0 is contesting his valuation. He was not present but does have the right to appear before the County Board of Review. Clay/Marks moved to support County Assessors estimated market value for PID #27-075-001-0 in the amount of $616, 000 (Budget Host Motel) . Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Reinke moved to support County Assessors estimated market value for PID #27-916-009-0 Bev Koehnen's property. Motion carried unanimously. There was no one in attendance at the meeting. Vierling/Reinke moved to close the Board of Review as of May 14, 1991. Motion carried unanimously. Marks/Vierling moved that the findings of the Board of Review be approved and sent to the County Auditor for certification, as of May 14 , 1991. Motion carried unanimously. Marks/Vierling moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 7 : 30 p.m. (17-Zi 1 )1d VYI d.th S. Cox ity Clerk Carol L. Schultz Recording Secretary TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ.REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JUNE 18 , 1991 Mayor Gary Laurent presiding 1] Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M. 2] Approval of Agenda 3 ] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 4] Mayor' s Report 5] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 6] Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. ) 7] Approval of Minutes of May 29 , 1991 8] Communications: *a] David Unmacht, City Manager, City of Prior Lake, resolution of thanks 9] 7 : 00 P.M. Public Hearing on the vacation of the alley in Block 30, East Shakopee Plat, lying between 1st and 2nd and East of Naumkeag Street - Res. No. 3413 10] Boards and Commissions: Planning Commission: a] Preliminary and Final Plat of Gary and Lori ' s Land b] Final Plat of Heritage Place 3rd - Res. No. 3416 c] Preliminary and Final Plat of Park Place - Res. No. 3415 d] McKenna Environmental Assessment Worksheet 11] Reports from Staff: *a] Scott County Recycling Agreement *b] 1991/92 Insurance Renewals c] Approval of Bills in Amount of $485, 874 . 11 *d] 1991/92 Set-Up Licenses *e] 1991-92 Wine Licenses *f] 1991-92 3 . 2 Beer Licenses *g] 1991/92 Liquor Licenses h] Clerk and Treasurer Bonding i] County Road 18 Interchange TENTATIVE AGENDA June 18 , 1991 Page -2- 12] Resolutions and Ordinances: *a] Res. No. 3417 - Urging Scott County Commissioners To Adopt A Local Option Sales Tax *b] Ord. No. 312 - Amending the Zoning Regulations By Changing Notice Requirements *c] Res. No. 3412 - Amending The 1991 Fee Schedule For Street Signs *d] Res. No. 3418 - Accepting Bids on 2nd Avenue, Project No. 1991-3 - memo on table *e] Res. No. 3397 - Approving the Final Plat of Meadows 5th - reconsider and amend 13 ] Other Business: a] b] c] d] e] 14] Adjourn Dennis R. Kraft City Administrator OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 29 , 1991 Mayor Laurent called the meeting to order at 9 : 00 a.m. with Cncl . members Zak, Wampach, Sweeney and Clay present. Councilwoman Vierling was absent. Also present were Dennis Kraft, City Administrator; and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk. Sweeney/Zak moved to approve the Special Call of the Mayor. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Zak offered Resolution No. 3408, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, approving a premise permit for Rotary Club of Shakopee, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Clay moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 9 : 02 a.m. (-;\ 44, Judith S . Cox ciky Clerk Recording Secretary MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, City Planner RE: Brambilla Business Relocation DATE: June 17 , 1991 NON AGENDA INFORMATION ITEM: Mr. Jack Brambilla has approached the City staff seeking assistance in relocating his business which is currently located at the northwest corner of Holmes St. and 1st Ave. Staff has scheduled a meeting with Mr. Brambilla for this Friday, June 21st to review his concerns. Some of Mr. Brambilla' s concerns on relocating his business include the cost of land, availability of parcels and what are the appropriate zoning districts for his business. He has also questioned why the City has allowed the Northstar Auto Auction facility to operate in an I-2 or Heavy Industrial zoned property. Staff will review the zoning ordinance as it applies to his business operation at the Friday meeting. Staff will also have a formal response prepared for application of the Zoning Ordinance as it pertains to the new Northstar Auto Action facility. AU/LE/BRAMBILA aL, PRI OSELHERITAG ' UNITY `YJXA f i'-' /IN cti„ 1891 1991 2097 v \\,......._ I1'\EsO� May 29, 1991 City of Shakopee Attn: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator 129 E. First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Dennis, On behalf of the Prior Lake City Council, I am pleased to submit to you this Resolution 91-24 expressing our thanks for your efforts in conjunction with the City of Prior Lake in addressing the Bloomington Ferry Bridge/County Road 18 interchange problem. We appreciate the support and assistance you have provided in serving as a valuable team member in addressing this serious concern. Our City Council is appreciative of your work and looks forward to continually working with you until this issue is resolved. Si erely, D id J. Unmacht C y Manager ty of Prior Lake DJU:db Requested Action: Receive and file the letter from David J. Unmacht , City Manager, City of Prior Lake , thanking the City of Shakopee for their efforts in addressing the Bloomington Ferry Bridge/County Road 18 interchange problem. 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 O PRI9+ it e ,, "CELEBRATE PRIOR LAKE'S CENTENNIAL - 1991" t„, /I/N,NEsO� RESOLUTION 91-24 RESOLUTION OF THANKS TO THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND EFFORTS ON THE BLOOMINGTON FERRY BRIDGE/COUNTY ROAD 18 INTERCHANGE PROBLEM WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee have taken an aggressive position reacting to the Metropolitan Council's decision on the Bloomington Ferry Bridge/County Road 18 Interchange problem; and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee unanimously supported the City of Prior Lake's aggressive position on this issue; and WHEREAS, the efforts to change the Metropolitan Council's decision are still underway and are by no means finished; and WHEREAS, the City Council and community of Prior Lake want to express our appreciation to the City of Shakopee for their support. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, that the City Council hereby expresses appreciation and thanks to the City of Shakopee for the Resolution of support and endeavors in helping the City of Prior Lake's efforts in addressing the Metropolitan Council's decision on the Bloomington Ferry Bridge/County Road 18 interchange. BE IT FURTHER BE RESOLVED, that a copy of this Resolution be forwarded to the City of Shakopee. Unanimously passed and adopted by the Prior Lake City Council on Monday, May 20, 1991. Mayor ee Andren (SEAL} 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 7 MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, City PlannerLk RE: Vacation of the Alley in Block 30 of East Shakopee Plat Resolution No. 3413 DATE: June 14 , 1991 INTRODUCTION: At their meeting on June 6, 1991 the Planning Commission passed a motion recommending that the City Council approve the vacation of the alley in Block 30 of East Shakopee plat. BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of the Scott County Section Map (Scale 1 ' = 200 ' ) illustrating the location of the proposed alley to be vacated. The alley is approximately 300 ' in length and is a dead end alley. Two different parties own land adjacent to the alley in Block 30. Happy Chef owns lots 1, 2 , 8 , 9 and 10. Dan and Teri Routson of Routson Motors own lots 3 , 4 , 5, 6 and 7 . Both parties have signed the petition requesting the vacation of the alley. The City is currently designing street improvements in the 2nd Avenue corridor. The improvements will be constructed this year. The City is also requesting that the Naumkeag railroad crossing, located in the 2nd Avenue right-of-way, be closed in exchange for opening a crossing at the Market St. intersection. Staff has routed the proposed alley vacation to the appropriate agencies and City departments for their review and comments. DISCUSSION: Attached is a memo from Minnegasco Company. They are requesting the reservation of an easement to retain the existing gas line in the alley. The public utility easement would maintain the same area as the alley. Minnegasco would consider relocating the gas lines with the costs paid for by the petitioners. Neither Routson Motors nor Happy Chef wish to pursue the relocating of the utilities at this time. The alley currently serves minimal traffic purposes to the adjacent property owners. The alley access is not required, nor desired by either adjacent property owner. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the vacation of the alley in Block 30 of East Shakopee Plat and the retention of the drainage and utility easement rights. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 3413 , a resolution vacating the alley in Block 30 of East Shakopee Plat, City of Shakopee and move its adoption. AU/LE/ROUTSONVAC RESOLUTION NO. 3413 A RESOLUTION VACATING THE ALLEY IN BLOCK 30 OF EAST SHAKOPEE PLAT CITY OF SHAKOPEE WHEREAS, the alley in Block 30, East Shakopee was platted and dedicated to the public use; and WHEREAS, it has been made to appear to the Council that it would be to the best interests of the general public to vacate said alley; and WHEREAS, the Council has set a date for a public hearing at which time to consider said vacation and due notice of the hearing has been given, as prescribed by law, and WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard on the matter were heard at the public hearing in the Council Chambers in the City of Shakopee; and WHEREAS, the Council has been fully advised in all things. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. That it finds and determines that the vacation of the alley hereinafter described is in the public interest and serves no further public need as an alley. 2 . That the alley in Block 30, according to the plat of East Shakopee to the City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota, is hereby vacated. 3 . That the City reserves, however, to the City of Shakopee its licensees and franchise holders a perpetual easement on, under and over the said vacated alley for utilities with the right to install, maintain, repair, lay and relay the utilities by the City, its licensees and franchise holders. 4 . After the adoption of the Resolution, the City Clerk shall file certified copies hereof with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Scott County. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1991. Mayor of the City of Shakopee AU/LE/ROUTSONVAC ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney AU/LE/ROUTSONVAC AG AGRICULTURE ZONING MAP CHANGES BY R1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL ACTION OF CITY C JNCIL R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL DATE ORD. NO,APPROVED UP_ ATED: R3 MID—DENSITY RES. R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. B 1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS B2 COMMUNITY BUSINESS `---- B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS r I1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL i: { 12 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL S SHORELAND %s FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT - j MANDATORY PUD — a RTP RACETRACK DISTRICT.-- ` E. - ... .,y, - -- _� --- -,-._. ;:ma - --- --- J('-'''''''--•, C7 I '^ '�.Tt1 ', "-r - 'tom-- • -�' j-.:--:-:•• '.00'7'. an..../ —_ • 1.4E :1 L „'e' ....•'n•` " '�. --•` i 1�1- —.. —_--- 1000 ra1R _ e. 1- 1 - t. lL � r - -- --`- - -------- �_.�-ter �* yFi yt ly^ i i •..!-.1:1,,.v.....31. . T,. ';17: ,,'�; ' j~4 + � � L1 -.14!"11, —� .tom - VINIs • ",,, ,.• ,:-„,14es tel'o.\ ..2.j.:1:1 .,-:----- , \ , ,. - i cr:;-: . vir.3 4, � - — .� '!f! ;! }: �i �- �.` r-- J .1'yi , ITS t \ t--i -, t • - • �' , ; 1 40e:=•-,‘ .t' �.: o -•I i 1-, ---Q` �Y• -n i. sem'• t y` Q ' cam+ • • ! •.�' .e� V :s: !. .ice 2 at , I.-- = �=. . A4 .:.:,r.. I . , !,� .v..:•,.. I. ;; R4 %s; ;.‘,,_,4_„1,,.,.... .: �-�- � 1. f-}..k• ::k, ;lCT.. •! ~ \ 1.........1 ii V........123,!. tai :L. .�... rid-i 4! F 1.-.i, \\ `M.:' '. I ' i 1 .I•`' 1..;'•l " tri _BE.' il +�'F jf7,-.. .,:_l I ;'.I '' I'` s1,/ , , .v.' pm.1 - .44 .', 1' 17. ,!1--- 40.11.1 i(t (`' s1 ll 1,7T--- -‹z/23' ! � •+, 1 • r FT111 7;1 r---1 i t, 1 ,'-•\ - - " „ , \ , l [-'t 1-Tt: , - / r1 r C. � ..__. !I"!' • ...1�,= Z L..IAt'Z•.! l�.I_i. 't :.n''_ ' L�.-.1—!.-.-a r'z _ .� \ ` 1.1.1-1._;:). .I l,`. .L •�, I • • PETITION FOR STREET OR ALLEY VACATION ' • • • • • • • DATE We the undersigned, owners of the following described real . property, abutting on the street or alley in question, hereby petition the City Council of the City of Shakopee to vacate the following (Streec)411113:110 tk Sl.,.csC.K, 312:::3 lying between �a Su aAo sur Sr. • .Sc. /Ave. , and between tiNkki K T. • ,_St, /Ave. PETITIONER LOT BLOCK /1-...-iy'i., , i J ii i/ 6-441/- _1„ 30 och 6.� � _ 2 30 l!3 Bo •.4. ‘20-,4.-. ( 7 4 .30 • —_ • 5 '30� • - �-0., i' :3 a �• i/ i ,f / • ; . ?!.,iced• . . :4 /...--7 �) is - • . ,. ., ,... 0 • . . .. ., ,.../ .. ..... • ,4-7,7". -5,:z.;:L,__,.......„...._.-_,... ........--- ;- )41i :). . . . "'• •f.'�'.t.. tom:.:' ..ii'P•. • . .� '.vet x:. ... ..• •»'e�. • ✓ ,y,,:. . 1..., ti. 'tom... - ' :�; =y:e. Lr:' ;,4:. y,.'•}•'e.' herebyverify that . a • • •';`*'�;; •• y I circulated the above pecitiC� � ith�zv _ = the above :.signatures of the property owners and' petitioner wera?;�- :: : . • affixed in my presence. : c+"; a ^:•: �' >=' :•.. _ .ire.:.:•• •? .. Circe ator • (;�•a;• �:�•ti•. •. ,}�.•,.: '• ..' .,__.;4.....,...•:„;-;...,....-•;•.,-,4z...-,...,:..4,,:,-1. ��A rov �iir ���+ k�.rt .`..,..-':` Iw �,ce{..;�:t. � ' •sii:� 'syr.!,•,. 7 4i15,_,-='..--;.-• K`•• -1t: 6-. pjrnnegasco A Company of Diversified Energies. Inc. May 28, 1991 City Planner City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN. 55379-1376 RE: Proposed alley vacation of Block 30, East Shakopee Dear City Planner: With reference to the proposed east/west alley vacation of Block 30, East Shakopee, Minnegasco does have an existing gas main in that portion of the alley proposed to be vacated. Since this gas main is an important part of our distribution system for this area we must object to this proposed vacation unless suitable easement rights are reserved to Minnegasco , - - pursuant to MSA 160 . 29. Please reserve an easement over the following described property: All of the East/West alley located in Block 30 , East Shakopee, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds in and for Scott County. We may consider removing our objection should the petitioner wish to reimburse Minnegasco the cost of relocating the existing gas main. To discuss this and any other options that may be available please have the petitioner contact Rick Pilon, Senior Design Engineer, at 342-5426. Thank you for the advance notice and please send me a copy of the final action on this proposal. Sincerely, Steven Von Bargen Real Estate Specialist Minnegasco cc: R. J. Pilon, Minnegasco Jim Carey, Minnegasco 700 West Linden Avenue P.O. Box 1165 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1165 c\I , , _.� ,.... .,, . .r) • . 1 + r (14: ii. CS . • • Odpt6 IIIIC) . 2 in w ti f N c i ... ....x.....i littaitz : . I i ../ fel 1.. \ \ \ \\1 i .2 \ Pr, 1 \ 1 % . fi i III ,t) — 1!ter' ,., , ; , , \ ; r ' C.31 a • 1 I i �1 1 i � I , N 1 1 moi ; N % **1114( rii I 1. ' ciD C%4 �'. i Q+ ......\; 1 •C\Zs:\—f... i° . ' 1- C N i ,n Z OA 1011. 1 � ` + 1 N Z ‘n Q O1 , r— . —. a) 1 41 !i 14 Ifti 4114. \ \\ . 3181V . a in r- 1, ........--;--- \\ \ .\ —' \\ ,c) \+ :I'D y \ m + • r i \. N N o \ rte'+ .n 1o&- MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, City PlannerL RE: Preliminary and Final Plat of Gary and Lori ' s Land Resolution No. 3414 DATE: June 14 , 1991 INTRODUCTION: At their meeting on June 6, 1991, the Shakopee Planning Commission moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the final plat for Gary and Lori ' s Land subject to conditions. BACKGROUND: 1. Gary and Lori Grunst have submitted a preliminary and final plat for Gary and Lori ' s Land. The proposed subdivision is located at the southeast corner of 11th Avenue and Naumkeag Street. The applicants are proposing to divide . 85 acres into two lots. The property is zoned Urban Residential (R-2) . 2 . The applicants are proposing to subdivide their 200 ' x 200 ' parcel of land into two residential lots. The property is a remnant parcel of section land which was never platted. The applicants reside in the house which would be located on Lot 1 Block 1 of the proposed plat. 3 . The applicants property is located in between The Meadows subdivision and the Prairie Estates subdivision. Recently the developer of The Meadows subdivision, Gold Nugget Development Co. , acquired a portion of the Grunst' s property to complete the curved section of Naumkeag Street. Since Gold Nugget Co. is constructing Naumkeag Street no further street improvements will be required of the applicants for their plat. 4 . A sidewalk will be constructed in the 11th Avenue right-of-way adjacent to the plat. Other subdivision developers along the 11th Avenue corridor have constructed the sidewalk where the street has been determined not to be constructed. 5 . In the acquisition of the land to be used for Naumkeag St. , Gold Nugget Development Co. agreed to install the required utilities (1" waterline and 4" sanitary line) to the south lot. The existing lot is served by water and sewer from 11th Avenue. 6 . The site is relatively flat and small in area. As a result, grading concerns can be addressed with the Building Permit process. Topographic information is shown on the preliminary plat. 7 . Staff recommends that a park dedication fee be collected in lieu of accepting park land. The property is not identified AU/LE/GARY&LORI as a future park site in the Comprehensive Plan Parks Element. 8 . No assessments currently exist on the property. 9 . Underground electric service exists for Lot 1, Block 1. Lot 2 will be subject to SPUC electric charges for services. 10 . All departments recommend approval of the preliminary and final plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary and final plat of Gary and Lori ' s Land subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of title opinion by the City Attorney. 2 . Execution of a Developer' s Agreement for the construction of required improvements and the required dedications: A. The sidewalk in the 11th Avenue right-of-way. B. A cash payment shall be made in lieu of land dedication for park purposes. The park dedication shall be paid at the time that the Building Permit is released for Lot 2 , Block 1, based on the applicant' s appraisal or the estimated market value from the County Assessor, whichever is less. 3 . The applicant must pay the park dedication fee for Lot 1 of Block 1 prior to final plat approval by the City Council , based on the applicant' s appraisal or the estimated market value from the County Assessor, whichever is less. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer and pass Resolution No. 3414 , a resolution approving the Preliminary and Final Plat of Gary and Lori ' s Land subject to conditions. AU/LE/GARY&LORI RESOLUTION NO. 3414 A Resolution Approving the Preliminary and Final Plat of Gary and Lori' s Land WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee did approve the Preliminary and final Plat of Gary and Lori ' s Land on June 6, 1991 and has recommended its adoption; and WHEREAS, all notices of hearing have been duly sent and posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council has been fully advised in all things. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the Preliminary and Final Plat of Gary and Lori' s Land, described on Attachment No. 1, be, and the same hereby is approved and adopted with the requirements that: 1. Approval of title opinion by the City Attorney. 2 . Execution of a Developer's Agreement for the construction of required improvements and the required dedications: A. The sidewalk in the 11th Avenue right-of-way. B. A cash payment shall be made in lieu of land dedication for park purposes. The park dedication shall be paid at the time that the Building Permit is released for Lot 2 , Block 1, based on the applicant' s appraisal or the estimated market value from the County Assessor, whichever is less. 3 . The applicant must pay the park dedication fee for Lot 1 of Block 1 prior to final plat approval by the City Council, based on the applicant' s appraisal or the estimated market value from the County Assessor, whichever is less. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk be and the same are hereby authorized and directed to execute said approve Plat and Developers ' Agreement. AU/LE/GARY&LORI Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1991. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney AU/LE/GARY&LORI ATTACHMENT # 1 That part of the North 200.00 feet of the West 200.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 115, Range 22, described as follows: EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 59 minutes 53 seconds East, along the North line of said Southwest Quarter 30.00 feet; thence South 0 degrees 00 minutes 10 seconds East, parallel with the West line of said Southwest Quarter 39. 10 feet; thence southerly along a tangential curve concave to the West, 153.72 feet to a point on the West line of said Southwest Quarter distant 188.85 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof, said curve has a delta of 22 degrees 39 minutes 27 seconds, a radius of 388.72 feet and a chord bearing of South 11 degrees 19 minutes 32 seconds West; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 10 seconds West, along said West line 188.85 feet to the point of beginning. -:e'L.. 5. . " s •11 l • .�, 1� ` , ; •mIasiktA. A 1\' airstOlg - _____Nr•-"--- ._ 'et/tx111• lea is .• • . . • . . .. _ -..,,g, 4,--.7.-4 tiso ,. . ..- . • •• . • . . `. . ,„„, .: ,... .. • • .ss j7 2 t.fit' . _ . . , ,..-.,-.. _..., :. . . iiii Vei . I . . . tl'" I• 4'. lef.1 Itill •1;!•1 I I ';', -1 4} Imo,,; 1 I i ! I.1 :I'I,; • ;\� , • r . l ,,...„4,4 am► 1111 t 1 • . , 161111111 alli 1 ii L.,41 Hi t:. r:r Li -,—,,,-. 1 glom AM.. . \ - wit.Vial s _ I 1 4 I• { I ( 1 ; `i I I i. Kxt4.t I 1 • !_ III v; 1 1 .!,, • i ee -! f 0� rwilli ,1t , 1 l - 1 :lit Inc ' ! I — . • d;0. - • m"c,,,,,"o i • • , , ERNE i 1 p:?...:s. •-•.„ IpS4 ... I 71-_- :. IMP mina - ' - ' . I - : . 1111= miromTh' ' 7 5111 •. . ' • ' IIIIIIIII , 1 illiiiill k .,V • , ' , e,{ ....... .- ..... , ...-.. i , ; 1.., io, . i. - . . 3 - I.... ' • 7.e.s.F: AI rtr. •::- , , 1 cag�al On as 1 , R4 ; A .----;-T'_. , • . •__ a' 1114_ cent \ J • 1 L.4.--- - ; © "��tr s oM� . OM 7.4. • gnilD4 III Mil NJ4 BIMR .. t11" T 1 _ - • CYRie e 1 r ! • ii I • W ,.ego.. r, i:-- - - -- — • ...1_.... - - -- ---- - I!. . 7-771 AG - - - ib II") MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Lindberg S . Ekola, City Planner RE: Final Plat of Heritage Place 3rd Addition Resolution No. 3416 DATE: June 14 , 1991 INTRODUCTION: At their meeting on June 6, 1991, the Shakopee Planning Commission moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the final plat for Heritage Place 3rd Addition subject to conditions. BACKGROUND: 1. Heritage Development Co. has submitted a final plat for Heritage 3rd Addition. The proposed final plat is located north of Vierling Dr. and east of Sapphire Lane. This is the third phase of the development and contains 26 lots and one outlot. The area is zoned Urban Residential (R-2) . 2 . In 1987 the developer received preliminary plat approval for the Heritage Place subdivision. A second preliminary plat was approved in 1989 and final approval given to Heritage Place 2nd Addition on October 17 , 1989 . Attached is a copy of the subdivision plats in the area around the Heritage Development. 3 . No major grading is necessary for Heritage Place 3rd Addition. The grading for this final plat has been completed with the Heritage Place 2nd Addition. This work was completed as required by the approved grading and drainage plan. 4 . Staff recommends that a park dedication fee be collected in lieu of accepting park land. No future park sites are identified in the Comprehensive Plan Parks Element to be located in the proposed subdivision. On June 4 , 1991, the City Council authorized the appropriate City officials to have an appraisal of the proposed subdivision be made to obtain a more accurate value of the land. Staff is currently seeking quotes for the appraisal services. 5. There are three double fronting lots and two corner lots along Vierling Dr. or south side of the proposed final plat. These lots are larger in size to accommodate the larger setbacks from the streets. 6. Vierling Drive is a collector street. Access to the lots from Vierling Drive should be prohibited except for at the proposed street, Heritage Dr. An agreement limiting access to the local streets is one of the recommended conditions. 7 . The developer is proposing to install oversized water and sewer lines in Heritage Drive, similar to previous AU/LE/HERITAGE 3 subdivision. The developer shall pay for the costs of constructing the typical water and sewer utilities. The City will reimburse the developer for the oversizing of the sanitary sewer line. A separate agreement for the oversized water line must be made with SPUC. 8 . Currently there are special assessments against this property. The City Engineer will reapportion these assessments against the lots, and the developer will waive his rights to appeal the reapportionment. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the final plat of Heritage Place 3rd Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of title opinion by City Attorney. 2 . Execution of a Developers Agreement for the construction of required improvements and required dedications: A. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPUC manager. B. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPUC manager. C. Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer to be installed in accordance with the requirement of the design criteria and standards of the City of Shakopee. D. Local streets and streets signs within the plat shall be constructed in accordance with requirements of the design criteria and standard specifications of the City of Shakopee. E. A cash payment shall be made in lieu of land dedication for park purposes. F. Construction of the oversized water and sewer lines as required by the City and SPUC. 3 . The City Engineer will reapportion the existing special assessment against the lots and the developer shall waive his right to appeal the reapportionment. 4 . The developer shall provide a recordable agreement stating that not more than 10% of the plat will be developed into twinhomes. Twinhomes will require separate utility connections and sites must be identified before installation of utilities. AU/LE/HERITAGE 3 5 . The developer shall enter into an access agreement as follows: No access to Vierling Drive will be allowed except for at the approved street, Heritage Drive. Access rights shall be limited by dedicating to the City the access rights in the access agreement. 6. No Building Permits shall be issued for Outlot A until it has been replatted. ACTION REOUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 3416, a resolution approving Heritage Place 3rd Addition and move its adoption. AU/LE/HERITAGE 3 RESOLUTION NO. 3416 A Resolution Approving the Final Plat of Heritage Place 3rd Addition WHEREAS, The Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee did approve the Final Plat of Heritage Place 3rd Addition on June 6, 1991 and has recommended its adoption; and WHEREAS, all notices of hearing have been duly sent and posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council has been fully advised in all things. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the Final Plat of Heritage Place 3rd Addition, described as follows: Outlot A of Heritage 2nd Addition be, and the same hereby is approved and adopted with the requirements that: 1. Approval of title opinion by City Attorney. 2 . Execution of a Developers Agreement for the construction of required improvements and required dedications: A. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPUC manager. B. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPUC manager. C. Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer to be installed in accordance with the requirement of the design criteria and standards of the City of Shakopee. D. Local streets and streets signs within the plat shall be constructed in accordance with requirements of the design criteria and standard specifications of the City of Shakopee. E. A cash payment shall be made in lieu of land dedication for park purposes. AU/LE/HERITAGE 3 F. Construction of the oversized water and sewer lines as required by the City and SPUC. The City shall reimburse the developer for the oversizing of the sanitary sewer. 3 . The City Engineer will reapportion the existing special assessment against the lots and the developer shall waive his right to appeal the reapportionment. 4 . The developer shall provide a recordable agreement stating that not more than 10% of the plat will be developed into twinhomes. Twinhomes will require separate utility connections and sites must be identified before installation of utilities. 5 . The developer shall enter into an access agreement as follows: No access to Vierling Drive will be allowed except for at the approved street, Heritage Drive. Access rights shall be limited by dedicating to the City the access rights in the access agreement. 6. No Building Permits shall be issued for Outlot A until it has been replatted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk be and the same are hereby authorized and directed to execute said approved Plat and Developers ' Agreement. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1991. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney AU/LE/HERITAGE 3 S 1 L........... . --. . . • I I - '7 • • ;.: r7.- ---'''I . I • -"'".7........: : Z : '34'7...:," - • • i Cc: I , • • , i •;li if 3 l.meml•mo•Mmoi R4 • . • , ,• 1 .. ....„ 1 • ! . . . . " . . , , 1 r ---- •--- i -•-•-- —•—• ----• _--- ---- -• . .._... ,.. ......._ --....-----.. ---. ----, . -9....... • RTD --.....,,, ,---?,-•••. . . • , . • . • / -,=.,.. • • - , 1 4:-.... % . . . ..--,--:k. \ , / , % • --.1-4,..,:,.....„ , : C...aaelt.net• 44. ., . -•---- '4 \ ' •'' / • -.. gla. ' 1 • .\ 1, / . •' ,, -••• . . •i . ' 1 ' - ..„ :.. I * • -----3. 1 ; . :'"•-....,.._ ri , 2 - • • : '1 • •---• ; : ' 1 : _ . \ , •. .. , 0 ` ..... , ..... . \ , . .. . -----4 r''" '"4. SN, •**i.'.; / .1.,/ ''\,,_•,a, - —T-4 --r-.1 ---..••••_ • • ...„:-.. • • ...... • ••,, : 3 ' • 5/ / • ! 1----•••• ,....-, •I ••••••••••I ..•-•••••;..... . i 1, .P.. • ' : •• ! i.L2M.:.; !..‘... ..: L.,;..,...-.....1,.... 1 i ),.. r.,..,,,f,4, ,...„(N,•,/ A i., . ...• 4,,/ .... X r141 - • ' -. ...'-• • IS.--1 t....it ,..---••i .----;-. \'`\(• 'l/-s ••• / • ; ' • >,. **C. 1 f-----.-1 •-1 \ 1 r---9! -7--j. r•--:—... ,i-'-.1 7-71 ,--.-- ":\.,‘\-7- .,411 ' .." :• .." ..' .- ,,,,:a•k. ..--,-,. '...... -...t L...--: ,.-.. ...i • -.1.“..... .-, 1 ! 1 , L.---V ... .A; i • N i. : • ,..i • V :---"'N---, i\'14ct • ' • • • I •• ' - V .,..•• • /,„- ' • • ' •' ,, ...j 1,..........L..4 E._......,.2, •..:. .__,::. Llizz.j L:ii= ,.........:...:....1 ; . . , • • -•• ,.... • , • " : -/ 4,,r --- --- --- — • :7',.+,, ; • •.........,, t •• . : , • 4 .1 /r-- -4-k,„, : ! ,---. . :.,, ;......., ....._......._ , ---__ .7_71 :-------t-i I I 24 •••1; . Wit ., . .. 7411 *C3••••• •-* .'``Y.V.2`.4' ....*44.: -' ,..4444.4,444. 6... .: .....•••••."414,••'"' 14i '.. ''',... J110.:a .0.• ,4s.. .?...:. • l'‘H OIL< , 1 afta q.,,p 1 r B 1 :PAP, / ' .\••• !'" : i Iv 5‘ • % • • , it \ .• / : \ i - . •••"(-""Ni• . : -•,., t'5\ •:,,7 i'i ,,- .1‘,..iZ,:4M---• mon••••=mi '' .. 1 : '2. . . •i4e ,...(.11-.....\)-,.14.... ) •,;77,r‘3\I l',/"ve.J.. . / //1./ , I 0 r-•,,,,,. L . oi", s•Wr: •,---..., \11,-- -rt,d9 5. : i, POr r ;' .4.(/‘••••/,......{...J. t...4 i 4,7::. . . $ i' •t 3! :• Z. 1•• •••• •"-••t‘ • . - ' i-7,--,, 3 , • , .!- - . ,\' .-.. ..... .., .................‘ .5, . :.6! 1 Sir .t *1• / -...:C: i 4.„; • 5T• araaai • /11, • VIM. 111111==•11/1=11M , . I! MO r'' .5• ,\:;',.....:.'kj.ti ! i 7 4. fr-Lireasi-11313•4'I hi/ . .i e/771 :. , • . -•„.....„/Z.-0-...el •••-d / , .. i , ,,,,,...„ -2 • ......._. i• t4i --- ...... ••••T 14i : ,. •,. I 1 • L.: P*'poll • 2 • S, ' i szioix:_2•• f 1-"--7', . ',..41 i.j' r ..d,-., !------1 • i--••-• ..--!--7—..-7----1 ! / r....1'----- \ -...______I Bi - • '--------, -- ----‘.'--•'----•—. -' • ,---ri _____•.. — . : :_._.L--, 01- 0' . ,,,,,v6 • • 111 --- • .... _ .... — — . • AG AGRICULTURE _ _ _ _ - - - - • .- _.. , - - - - - _,..... _ .- RI RURAL RESIDENTIAL _ - - .__.- ! _ ... _ - - ..__ _ _ R2 URBAN RESIDENT'IAL. . - - - - - R3 MID-DENSITY RES. . . . _ _ - - - - - - • • R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. . _-- - - - _ - - . A G B1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS ! , B2 COMMUNITY BUSINESS : • . . B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS . 4 .• • • L.... . . . 11 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL . 12 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ...............Irr•V`I7P•soimissaimmffm,-.,v,-,••s-v-r-r •NoNms11111P-77-7-74. CH LINE S SHORELAND 111121 FLOODPLAIN D -i I •-••• MANDAT• - " , - RTD RAC ,-ACK Da I . cc ' 0' Foi ic4y ,I 1 �„ •,' i, Til'' it lif ' i 34. ----- V 5 ' 128 , ;H . • ! . . • _.____4..___ i 4 -_--k. I • 1RIT g E 1 ! 1 - �� .5gi � - II P1 1 Irmo OO Q9 D+�," Pi W.• ffr IF II^ T: 4J 0 7 �� O iIF CZ ��e''� Q \ ,\ ... i . 1 • • mfti li SHE* C� ow nim a, �0 4 it �� .7 • - I I . v �! Mt: �:: �E MEL EMU mit iiiim iiim Milt: /AU Ste\ ��'�wuit \� - f. OO esi irraum to coni mi� ?f iAii — — — — ,0 9 lit- ImisommF*4,----"4., - . - IN gril 12:1114=111P-1441 12r-11 ). Ala '14 i WU 111k; 40 3114 1. 44 Q �/�` r -. tOVft NOv / 0' *SY 21lab ��MI U. liti.�. CfI MA.M► i3 I•!T` , IQ �© �. iAI © '_ itas Qwt[ O. 01,11.07 G C. r !4 2 1 relli DA A =MB liordie : 138MIMI DPP<I-;—; , I - v III plii sync.. - _. _ - - I - I_ 00 00 00 00 00 .. �00 l - ... Hec 1 TACZ 1 1 Vio diP0 Pi•ACE I 1 I 1 3DADP., I JD Oe MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, City PlannerL.6 RE: Preliminary and Final Plat of Park Place Resolution No. 3415 DATE: June 14 , 1991 INTRODUCTION: At their meeting on June 6, 1991, the Shakopee Planning Commission moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary and final plat for Park Place subject to conditions. BACKGROUND: 1. Dan and Teri Routson have submitted a preliminary and final plat for Park Place. The proposed subdivision is located south of First Avenue and west of Marschall Road. The applicant is proposing to replat 14 parcels and an alley to be vacated concurrent with this plat. The property is zoned Highway Business (B-1) . 2 . The applicants own a conglomeration of lots and vacated right- of-way in this area. The lots were originally created in two different subdivision plats. In an effort to reorganize the properties so that they can be more easily developed with respect to the City Codes, the applicants are proposing to replat the property into two lots. 3 . The applicants have filed a petition to vacate the alley on the west side of the proposed subdivision. The alley vacation will be reviewed prior to the review of the plat at the City Council meeting. Staff is recommending that the alley be vacated. 4 . The applicant has received approval for a conditional use permit to move in a sales office structure onto the property. This structure is limited to use by the automobile dealership only. 5 . Since the site is already developed a grading plan is not being required. The site is basically plat with a slight slope to the north or First Avenue. Topographic information is shown on the preliminary plat. 6. Staff recommends that a park dedication fee be collected in lieu of accepting park land. No future park sites are identified int he Comprehensive Plan Parks Element to be located in the proposed plat. 7 . No special assessments currently exist on the property. AU/LE/PARKPLACE 8 . Graphic changes on the final plat as required by the Planning Commission have been completed and submitted to staff. The three conditions relating to these changes have been deleted since they no longer apply. 9 . The resolution for the vacation of the alley in the proposed plat will be adopted prior to the decision on the plat. The condition from the Planning Commission requiring the completion of the vacation will have been met. 10. All departments recommend approval of the preliminary and final plat for Park Place subject to condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary and final plat for Park Place subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the title opinion by City Attorney. 2 . Execution of a Developer's Agreement for the construction of required improvements and required dedications: A. A cash payment shall be made in lieu of land dedication for park purposes. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No. 3415, a resolution approving the Final Plat of Park Place and move for its adoption. AU/LE/PARKPLACE Resolution No. 3415 A Resolution Approving the Preliminary and Final Plat of Park Place WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee did approve the Preliminary and Final Plat of Park Place on June 6, 1991 and has recommended its adoption; and WHEREAS, all notices of hearing have been duly sent and posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council has been fully advised in all things. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the Preliminary and Final Plat of Park Place, described on Attachment 1, be and the same hereby is approved and adopted with the requirements that: 1. Approval of the title opinion by City Attorney. 2 . Execution of a Developer' s Agreement for the construction of required improvements and required dedications: A. A cash payment shall be made in lieu of land dedication for park purposes no later than upon issuance of a building permit for Lot 1, Block 1. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk be and the same are hereby authorized and directed to execute said approved Plat and Developers ' Agreement. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1991. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney AU/LE/PARKPLACE ATTACHMENT # 1 Lots Three ( 3 ) , Four (4 ) , Five (5) , Six (6 ) and Seven (7) of Block Thirty ( 30 ) , EAST SHAKOPEE, Scott County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for said County and State. Together with That part of the vacated alley in Block 30 , EAST SHAKOPEE, Scott County, Minnesota per City of Shakopee Resolution No. that is adjacent and adjoining the above described Lots. Together with Lot B, Except the West Twenty feet (20' ) thereof ; Lots C, D and E, Block Thirty ( 30 ) , EAST SHAKOPEE and Lots One ( 1) , Two (2 ) and Three ( 3 ) , Except the Easterly Seventeen feet ( 17' ) of Lot Three (3 ) measured on the North and South boundaries thereof, of AMERICAN LEGION ADDITION to the CITY OF SHAKOPEE, according to the respective plats thereof on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Scott County, Minnesota. Together with That part of vacated street and drives per City of Shakopee Resolution No. 1369 , that is adjacent and adjoining the above described Lots per the plat of AMERICAN LEGION ADDITION to the CITY OF SHAKOPEE. Together with Lot A and the West Twenty fee (20' ) of Lot B, Block Thirty (30 ) , EAST SHAKOPEE, Scott County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder. AG AGRICULTURE ZONING MAP CHANGES BY `R1 RURAL RESIDENTIALL ACTION OF CITY C JNCIL R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL ,...9LTsar-Lw24=- Qi yiiiUPDATED '..... R3 MID-DENSITY RES. R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. B 1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS 02 COMMUNITY BUSINESS . • B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS , / „,, ,,,...;,,,,- ...., 11 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 12 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL S SHORELAND , i FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT ' / AG ...... MANDATORY PUD RTP RACETRACK DISTRICT-- ---7----- - l-------- ---"7"----- ,,, ( J . . - ---•----- ' ....-- - .- ..„------ ... . - . , -.4- ; ..-- -- ' , - .....” - -----.... _.....---- _-_____- ,.......- -.4-,-.,...._.....-- , , , :.• • ...o.''' --.- .- .." . . .-- ,.."V 1 ______--- , .-' ,----• .4.• '' : ,...,'- .' :.' -..'• ' " --".; - - ,_.-----:: ' , , -, ,..‘, •'%4 ) _ ' . .., _ ----- , k , 1, -: . --..-....7 . .... __- __, , I , 3 ' ,,, s... .• , .•••-• ill, ., .... -... —-- ---- - ----------. 4 .... 12„._--------- ----T---- — • '.,:.,' •,'..., , ‘, r -,-,',I'd:3 - 11- 'is...11RA-' lik • •i , i 'Vrittf 1 ..' •. +I '441- ., c:_iTA I. 13 e,,i lk „AO` Ii. . -17-74.4:1•,i--; 1 i C:.1. 1'4 •ii' Il'*• , :1 ,. , ...,- i 1.. . '4,•-•. .., ill 1 • ,. ---- - • J '-.:' . • i• ':al c•-•. 1- .. t.11.1i ----1-'--- •-- •::------ , • I I t , ii- 1 '‘r-A- ‘ ',--13. iitiD.i • • . ; . .; A‘.; 11 ...:_j..‘ '\. .1 .,• 1 1-yi, 3 ,.\ .„..... ...._ ii .,\.1- -----7. -:- -- :: : I .1 ' i '' 11,-•,. i ‘':\ ., CkitA_Lii _.___-1 ---\\ 1 .7 4 •---- : .0 _ - . , 1 ,___\ ,,,'•,,' li. 3 1.1-' ; . ••'• t _:i 1.3-1-6-1 ‘ ' .. r--4" .i-, -.p ; , v ‘" 4-- , ‘ o -.t :-1 .,--i -.ii. , ,--A 1 , ,, • : . . -- . _ k_i_i—J --1 •,i ‘\ . :: , , . .,,k '• . ) ! • i , , -i7 !y . -,.\ •1 ..,,„._ r-x-.-ci-vB :TT . • tzl:Cri•A•A L' '.-;1-1 ___- r •---L—) , ...:1, :,--3:, --- 11 I • r . : 1._, - __•,--,-", ,i,•• " . - ' , \ , . ' ---,,- 1 ! ,7-\,.. la:,-.., .,...0 ‘-,*-,:::-r „•,,o,. . B2 1 - , . . . ,,.. ,Itt..13-A v:::- 2 • 1* i ..-1 , :... -,.......,....„......„.„. ) , , 11414 I .1frt 11 . ,,...;..1 — Br ill , r---I z...; . 1 ,.. . i . -.. . , •., • : , . t .; ,„."-. - iii ! - ,.-i = -- --c 1 __,..,! . ki_J--1-•,- 4 1,..,: 2 • ......_, ,q--T--- ! et I .121....i'..), 1.1-1;; Triftk•i-:-.,)i ii__1_, . „:41111 - 1 1 . t.,..:%; 1 1 Zi --— j 3 ......"=”m....1 ! I:- R4.1:,3-5 &Okla**. -'- 2 j !lk —1 f'EL P. •• • • ' • lt V‘ • ir" ---i ---7-1-- - 1 .c-147-1 -m: ‘ ". 1 ..s,,-) , .1;-,:=.1TO:.:-7L-cl .....—"•--,1 1/4''' I -... 0 \ ,11 ! i pi 117.:.] T ' ! 1 [111!] . :1 ' l • .____ : .. .ii, ,---... ----. 1 MITI i f ii, R _ ,I,.,1 - --- i, l 'T i . Il • -41-/••S\ •ed'i••.1%. 1 . , ;i' - 4•••••.._ 4.,, ; _,,,. ...--• .... 1 ._' 1 _.„:,_ 1,1 - , t'.... ..!..—'.1. -,!.........1. . i...,i I .--C-. • i---y- _. : .74r.:.,,,i -.i,•_.---:--- , ....1....• i --- I ,-,---, . - r .7., •---.--2, ,-.....--__J 7,L.i..-±-_-) r:- -- . . , • . , • 1, . , i I.; Emil LIE K.ii-!$,..L_I 7 1 I, \„,„„ ....,,,.„-- , ! 1 1 c •. i ,. .. • :., , ,,,.1%.' 'ilt,.;' '',.,I46 ! 1 __.._ 7,T IQ —.--tii i •-•:\vi-;;.-i2.7,,,,-;-, -,:i-i_fl --,--_-)7,7:".its-. .....::(.4,, ., - • Nt. - ... '` . `-L PAF Scafe 1 t11c.h- 40-Feel- 10tt1r ALL IOI IT ffiSt )tlCSUTS: That Daniel P. B.outson the Teri L. 40 20 0 40 80 120 proprietors, and O...ral Motors Anna sumo, Corporation, a Rev Tory s. 1 - - aescrlboo property situated in th. County of Scott, Stat. of Ytna.bo Scale In feet Lots to:.. (3), four (4), 11v., six (6) and Nven (7) OfB1.05 L YSnoesota, according to tna plat thereof on file and of r.00rd for MM ootanty and state. together vith That part of the vacated alley la Bloch 30, EAST SHALOM, Scot Resolution No. that IS ads)anent inn adjoining the above 0 together el to Lot B Except the lest Twenty feet (20') thereof; Lots C, D, and Lots One (1), T.o (2), Three (3) Except the Easterly 17 feet of South oouadari.s thereof, of the AI(faICAY LEGION ADDITI011 to to Alliii. respsativs plats thereof on file sad of record in the Of11er of ALL.SO t. tone tOPPr with That part of vacated street and drives per City of 6lasopee Ras the atwve described Lots per the plat of AMRYICAB LEGION ADDITI together wits lot A and tn. Colt Twenty feet (70') of Lot B, Bloch Thirty (30 according to the plat toar.of on f11e and of r.00rd in the 0111 Raw caused to. sw to B. surveyed and platted as PARK PUCE and for puolin use forever the ....rats for drainage and utility purpow in vita..• etr.af said Daniel P. boutso. and Teri 1.. loutson, l..br this day of , 199 0 DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT Basial P. Bouton T.; SET 9 MARKED R.L.S. NO. 17009 Aad 1n vlta.as vaor.of said O.e.ral Motors Aoaptaao. Corpozation,_a 'meats to B. signed by its proper officer this day o1 Bearing Orientation The North line of AMERICAN LEGION ADDITION to the Ons'' MOTORS ACCEPTLICZ ODEPOHATIO CITY OF SHAKOPEE is euum.d to hear N 77'59.53'E By , its By— r- ` ` E. TA. E TRUNK '7 i!W`'•11i Found iron pipe 120 plat 427.10 N 77'591535E 308 plot monument 7 r= -r 104 322.60 11110E--- Tho 10�32A07 r---------------------- I n I I I I 1 RVIC_ I R:`c'= I I I Vacated per Ooeumenf No. 171091 8 278065(• 3 o a I 1 I . t: r— r^ M1: I tf) e: coQ • I G I(11 . L �— 1 ;Ir 1 to1 J N178.0414'E �� ' Ni 'a � I y59.90 ,t I 'to 1 to ,) 60plat ``) E J_ ,. 3200 _ ...t rL_ III c Vacated per Document e.P tIO1 16 foot Dr�ine�s 0 Utility E asle.nt 1 �.. _• I y 1 I C. k' of CO 1 NI /, tl t s Z, i B LOCK - I CD 1 Qi I I 1 s I I I I I1 to ri •lt IOL------ SIO IOL -------�---------------- -----� e 0 b 15 •: 10 foot DRAINA*E or UTILITY EASEMENT 0 180 Plot e 249.45 plat y 179.85 N 78.08114'E - Found iron pipe 249.68 N 77'50'47`E c ^ •,r.I ' monument '\•• r'a' r; 4 I111If1I1t1- itOft III ! I11It14i f ' I 111t ' i i ! S I I iM1 . ! 1 f " 1 � i ! ,' r -I l ; 1 ' r . II ! f ! l i 1 f ! ! ' �i_ of track CHICAGO 8 NORTHWESTERN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY ALLAN tK PLACE iY tson, kesbaad and .if., owners and srper'a Lion, mortgag.. of to.. foiiwini is, to wit: STATE Or MIlOONTOTA arty (30), LAST SHALOM, Scott Count), COUNTY Of SCOTT Aa the 05/1e. of the County /scorner in aha The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before a• this day of , 199_ by Daniel P. toucson and Tort. L. koutson, nusoand and wife. t Coity, Minnesota per City of Shasopse .scribed Lots. Notary Public, Scott County, Minnesota My Concession txpires L, Block Thirty (30), LAST SMALOPSS and Lot Three (3) wasur.o on to.. North Are STAT= OP e CITY ar NMALOPLZ, according to the COUNTY or the County tecord.r in and for Scott County, Th, foregoing iaatrvrnt .an ackno.lecg.d before se this day of , 199____ by its and by its of General Motors Acceptance Corporation, a Mow York corporation on benall of the corporation. olutioe No. 1369, that is adj acetic and adjoining 011 to the CIT! OP SEASOPLL. Notary Public, , ), LAST SMALOPSI, Scott County, Minnesota, My Commission txpires no of the County lecorder. I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as PASS PLACE , to herby donate and dedicate to the public that this plat is a correct representation of the survey, that all distances are correctly shown to fee: Is as an,.. on the plat. and hundredths of a foot, that all monuments nave wen correctly placed in the ground as sown, that to. sutsido ooundary lines are correctly designated on the plat and that then are no .•tlaode or public 4 and wife, have hereunto let their hods nigoways to be designated other titan a scows. Allan it. Mastiags, Land Surveyor Minnesota /icons* Ne.17009 . L. lnutson STATE OP MI)MSSCIA Mow York anrporatioa, has caused that. COUNTS ar SCOTT .1S9 . The foregeing instrument was ackaowledg.d before r this day of , 199_ , by Allan 1 I. Mastings, lead Surveyor. Notary Public, Scott County, Minnesota its My Commission tapirs $y\o\ QTY mama., QRZ W NhiLOP,Z,-MAOI►• -. !'.1:'... ...MP\O Z This plat of PARK PIACS was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, ''-•' 0"\\5 this day of , 199 , and the conditions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, " be _ \O. 78.006■E Subdivision 2, have en fulfilled. 70.01 -- Found iron pipe �lT= • monument By , Mayor Attest ,Clerk 11 O PLUDIO COMMISSION, CITY OP NBAKOPMS, MISDOBCTI Found MD.O.T. R/W Monument /10 { MOO. Appr•ved by the Pl.oe+og Commission of the City of Shakepse, Minnesota, this_day of , 11 I1 y 199_ .j , .�.� : i-`. L.f I C.' . '.J :K Sy its Chairman ' CITY Armour, CITY OP SLILOPQ �OSA , SD I hereby certify that I nave wraaiasd the *orthicons of title of this plat and nereoy recommend this y r- �- ' plat for approval by the City Council. �1 ,.r_ :. III City Attorney 3 f a3/ 4 City of Shakopee, Minnesota 1 J 0 Bever COUNTY TSLAtLi �I COUNTYR All entreat 199re_ tames ap.14 is lull as at this day of , 199_ . I 1 / 71 aott County Treasurer 1 iCO2'T OD(!r!A1IDITd lrere if 1tri 1 B.delinquent tans and =Tonafer watered this day of , 199_ 1 1.7/ Soott Coant7 Auditor I! / • CV/ / Lover moTT sNt:slQt 1 1 1'�eeaat te Chapter 7, Minnesota fere of 1271, this plat has been approved this day of 1 , 199_ . 1 -----—010 11. Soott County Surveyor o_ i • ' SCOTT OOUST! atc� _ 70.00 •non' I hereby owC MACSrtify tint this plat of MACS mks filed this day of , 199 t.3 at 78°02'22'E at .'cleek . M. and duly recordeda Document No. • Bk. PL. e9t. %41.016,,,,, Soott County Rewarder Wat ►'S1 LAND SURVEYING SMAKOPEE 445 4027 i • Dcsc9.1.pTe74 • _ ,.ii p.4.4 toasiea . Vel 'a +R-6°,FAST S144ec09 I.- 1 M 1 N Ain's.... ceneeen, (I.0 torero. i-tiQ C;4f o4 5.(wEsMt QESo(.L1(ot.) ........414 .4.ado. 'Taw IS .d jA.4.i. . J JA .1 ....11t . '.. •• la.+cls aceiG.1.1...'Ts, r.4.4la r• L ots tamp(3). few(41. ft..(I), r1.(4)•ad mow.(7).f Moot Snort. (701. . 710T WEOIa.NOM dtnaf. •asasru. .a..rdf.[to tr plea LA....,o,filo or ofrifitiO•..eroS CsiC•ER e o••••to too Offlr of ten Omni,a..M'a.f 5a or for..40 4.4tom•r Kato. MEO.ypre.s lanann.YOY.- SYiIFAC tr••wr.5t4 Lot 7 Seep*SM Mt Two. foot(7e•) taor•.ti Lots C. 0.r t. is...Tart. Iv .•] Dumaras RoGK (7.). MIT EE.E000 SM Leta ea.(1). . (2)•Tomo(3)MM. tn.e..url• L fdldt. 011...401,54 1311s.-100.64, Lev! 17 foot of tot Talmo(31•w.w.M M A.tNorth mod p Sort.reort..tMnef. of ' tM At�ICa7)i01dt1 AID1TION to Sao CITY or 411440P01. ..wr.t.e to w m.ect.r. altar De•aoras 'a{LMFAt7 DooR plotA ta.r•et ea f11.•r wSa et re•i• o OfILA oM .Mroo of tae Cot. o. r ., t for Most 0oea7. rt...«to. a•L•61.9 D S.1401-aC F..uraawx fl .aoQ Otstrttor.its •a fat part of meatal ranee.r . eM b set.•.pm.Cin of M opso d. l551 . ISN. `:ls:see -0••••••9` 1-...-• mo(�..�1 toot 1.re 3. •t.r 4010[•53Mri [Wm some 4eM Lon..0.am plot e. K• (959)' ..M.,-5I AISEICA•LEGION ADDITION t.the CM Q SootONQ. /� I..j t M••.a•.r•5S1511 o oommo aa. N . - t R�T Wet A or tae Mt Twat?foot(70'1 of lot S.71..4 TatR.(701. Slap •o E..•c.roc ��ar INT SSARONTI. Scott Co.nt.. •t...Mt.. .ce,fflN b LA.95.1 tMref 65 ....a-...-.-_ : ....• til..40 of recent to w*Mow of w On.t.3ocerMr. Sw..et v. -ted• i.....y •�- E•'••1-r•- •,....� , '� ,r,..„4............-.....4,.-7 ammo.[of mom),a 0.' 7.77.1.':::.:_,.-.,.'[� ., `.. ''•::. -- ` • "1 -- 4.27.10 TMt I e.d..1.•olt.YM load 3.5...00 Nolo,too 1.50 of tit. c ,(^- GA.v, IA.H rW. \I 120 A.t• Q•4Z - Cowy j I st ftotaE4 t �Ma I 4#'�L� 71oo•aet.tiMtrtntloo 50. 19005 , r ..% r 0 MOO. 11140 Amor dl ... I c 7►.a.•M. ■140.404 .'�[, .�••• .5 r. .: -. • 77799Noe.1112 443.4037 ` � 'I i I 1 S J J J nil. i 1 off ►'• _741 44" /- I I .�r:-IT t. 11/ ali 1 . t. QeJ�I_op� 4C OW gag- k: C>?moo a� a- I/ f / j I ` °'�1 n g i DAUB(. P�Tr.21 L. RauTse� , J,r�Y a Cr a; 1 ate. 'v 1- .&31 L1 pe,(uE '�~a` / > �� ti I a: .t Sarco PE E f /VI N, �P Z I. a . p� `� 3 • Q -L� I `` PMO(!L•44 5300 t ']�T2 It i .. .. a• I I I µI1 Zout,� _ 5 -� - f -- ; i, --- f"t . • ., t L ,-.,--,- i , �'l.•�. ,, _ - l - Dem jlht. EM.Lw. UT - 7 za eq.l4`e • ,, � I. j'.•�•' .-.�..- ��.'---- f 111.•0 ala & 120 Pt.- I ` '4 �PQ 3 '• -1 19.?9�C-_ N-io•o?i4E�- - �< `�32.m N�TTE t \ Re •• IG.00j 4),1-1.6.`- f R ti- �`ex- i t•r__° �fio,13 f - 119.70-- NZ •d4'14.E " 'D nr fe3`.l" • I M �1 . • i `Me.Os : I , ..d`1 ~ ,i.,.. 0. , ,., . ,.s., „...,...-...r i 1.. 1 .0 14711.''' �I �- , / ; O - f ( Lot f �• .3\ • _ . ,_ DA i,551tii ' I .....1 ..; Nr5e � ; ARK P 'LPLCE. .s. O.WOTeS .5.0¢0.Sewer CJLTC4 Z'61,14 Bst.2 I n1 G AIt6 A s 5,...L.1..A.s.p — De..o':1 Qo.'CatrIf. CAMAS O Da1.10TLS Psw.0 .R SET 50.21 RPE M0.Y1a NA FLIT ****o Veioyes Mew Aa.•6. VLL¢b TOTAL aZak. VP 4)95 so,.1..te FE6T Y D£.iore. 'Pow eve. lt...Ta 15f.w'LH Mt►4(z Top tau tt.1041p1.tT 3 QuwOQAUT d' 41t D6'.1QPES LtC,t,T - Flew 4lk.E. 4 fa ess.tAu- V+0•4) n 61.944-rias Tv?.vs C^•1 C1"`•'•I •--- De NOTtS SIG►1 POST W. I.YC W..!"ii. ,Z111P,s.ma aaaMS" s�... --"..=.--== ,VENUE EavT $ STATE TRUMK IAIG-kWP 101 g •*------ - a.+ 4 a -' ' "" 5-�u —w.t`Gej:s+ee=a sa+�•. ��.... --t---.-3 xs yam. Gawss M1 �O/I.�MW -1S -E �-� a =3utnss 1,4t7-7.":01:5'-'.04. T o • •z ___:6T.,.-:111-5 - ;i - e _ s� L'- E _ fir• y ‘c......eft. Mow... C.4.....• C..y J �,y s , r--- B.+e 734 1 �Swue.e ID1 S 1 , ^ r, 4:_,--:,,,;:.._;_-'7, I; '`1-- - Une.Tso fee Qeeoo-4.r...t Iola INA +-.; , ,` �-' ---� l t►8,...n...c. �e�o•+cc `l_...aS 6.a..u..r*�e�*,ieasT .t, .)I a 7 1 ; e� - `! say e i8 I d Roo►n g d a ,s I Snow • O .i -� s 0 N... ®I 3la'L l� - Ca ,r ,0) i 30.05 Y 1 _-:il . L.._ ,....., , , .. Dom-- - - - 1. y( ( �7 ioMo.. •' /i J I4 /` rI -walk 1 1 i a OlInm ..":747 i , /TZ..° � d1• I • •-- I- -• 1� i •- - • F 1 I lila. / 4-1er ��111reJ,3; � I SToQY I� I__'`:T1I ' + 4 cotl / �y6 Iv I 21L,� I j f`• : Gi 1/ �i�'.Id I Baa I a1o( N• �' It 3t - + - -, - �i I t.....tTr 1--- L.__k_...) 1 \....., I - . I -•- . 1,• •k- --•To.Qo- -,.tt.o:'- a...,.-,;.e::=....-..:-...:...,:- 1.._ ......�-;= :c0 1_ .,I I 1_, I *a •.ei N Z9 02 2l b" _ P.... -- wr • zz=ss 005 -- 26946O e •4 Cda MIm --•' • — . a -- tfo9.6"-- 2 -- 249.69-- N -t7-so'a7"E / T 04SP0RTATtOt4 COMPANY Baa o -T-CUr r5 AST -742 MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, City Planner(„ RE: Environmental Worksheet For Proposed McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine DATE: June 14 , 1991 INTRODUCTION: On May 29 , 1991, the 30 day comment period ended for the Environment Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed McKenna Sand and Gravel operation. The next step in the process is for the City of Shakopee, which is also the responsible governing unit (RGU) for this proposal to make a decision on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) . BACKGROUND: Attached are the comments received by the City of Shakopee in reference to the EAW. The EAW was distributed to over 20 governmental agencies. Copies were also sent to various libraries, including the Scott County Library in Shakopee. A cover sheet listing the returned comments has been provided. DISCUSSION: From the comments received on the EAW for the proposed McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine, several valid questions have been raised. More information is needed to satisfactorily answer the environmental concerns. The areas which need more information generally included proposed truck traffic volumes and necessary roadway improvements, location of Phases II and III for machinery and stockpiles, and stormwater drainage provisions. The Minnesota Environmental Review regulations state that if the RGU determines that more information is necessary to make a reasonable decision about the possible environmental impacts of a project, the RGU can postpone the decision on whether or not there is a need for an EIS for up to 30 days. The RGU may also make a positive declaration which would require that an EIS be prepared to obtain the lacking information. Staff recommends that the City Council direct the applicant to collect the appropriate information necessary to answer the questions raised in the comments received. Staff has transmitted these comments to the applicant. The applicant anticipates being prepared to respond to the comments by the July 2 , 1991 City Council meeting. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Postpone the decision on the need for an EIS for up to 30 days. 2 . Make a positive declaration requiring that an EIS be prepared for the proposed McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1, which would postpone the decision on the need for an EIS up to 30 days. ACTION REOUESTED: Direct Mr. McKenna to provide the necessary additional information for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet. EAWMCK. 691 EAW COMMENTS RECEIVED McKENNA SAND AND GRAVEL 4/ 5/91 1. MN DNR National Heritage Program /Nongame Wildlife Program 4/30/91 2 . Minnesota Historical Society 5/ 8/91 3 . Metropolitan Council 5/21/91 4 . Prior Lake - Spring Lake Watershed District 5/23/91 5. City of Prior Lake 5/23/91 6 . MN DNR Natural Resources Planning and Review Services 5/24/91 7 . Scott County Highway Department 5/29/91 8 . Scott County Planning Department 5/29/91 9 . Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community 5/30/91 10. MN Pollution Control Agency 5/30/91 11. MN Department of Agriculture (No Comments) 5/30/91 12 . MN Department of Public Service (No Comments) 5/30/91 13 . MN Department of Health (No Comments) 5/30/91 14 . MN Department of Transportation (No Comments) 5/30/91 15. U.S . Army Corps. of Engineers (No Comments) 5/30/91 16. Metro Waste Control Commission (No Comments) 5/30/91 17 . U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (No Comments) 5/30/91 18 . U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (No Comments) 5/30/91 19 . Board of Water and Soil Resources (No Comments) • 004.7- 1 ‹ STATE OF a• 1 HCEZOITQ s9 qo / DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 07 ONA INFORMATION 500 LAFAYETTE ROAD • ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA • 55155-40 (6t Z)2966157 • April 5, 1991 • , LeRoy Nyhus .1i T 1 • Nyhus Engineering - r, Box 317 Henning, MN 56551 Re: proposed gravel mining and reclamation project in sec. f2, T115N R22W, city of Shakopee Dear Mr. Nyhus: The Minnesota Natural Heritage database has been reviewed to determine if any rare plant or animal species or other significant natural features are known to occur within one mile of the above referenced project. Based on this review, there are no known occurrences of rare species or natural features in the area searched. The Natural Heritage database is maintained by the Natural Heritage Program and the Nongame Wildlife Program, units within the Section of Wildlife, Department of Natural Resources. It is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's rare, endangered, or otherwise significant plant and animal species, plant communities, and other natural features, and is used in fostering better understanding and protection of these rare features. The information in the database is drawn from many parts of Minnesota, and is constantly being updated, but it not based on a comprehensive survey of the state. Therefore, there are currently many significant natural features present in the state which are not represented by the database. We are in the process of addressing this problem via the Minnesota County Biological Survey, a county-by-county inventory of rare natural features, which is now underway. Because there has not, to our knowledge, been an on-site survey of the biological resources of the project area, it is possible that ecologically significant features exist for which we have no record. Thank you for consulting us on this matter, and for your interest in minimizing impacts on Minnesota's rare resources. Please be aware that review by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Programs focuses only on rare natural features. It does not constitute review or approval by the Department of • Natural Resources as a whole. • Sincerely, eer'AiLt‘t, Bonita Eliason Endangered Resource/Environmental Review Specialist 612/296-8324 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER a MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOUNDED I N 1 849 Fort Snelling History Center.St. Paui, MN 55111 • (612) 726-1171 April 30, 1991 Mr. Lindberg A. Ekola City of Shakopee 129 First Avenue East Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Mr. Ekola: Re: McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine; SW/4 NE/4 S22, T115, R22 City of Shakopee, Scott County MHS Referral File Number: 91-1083 Thank you for providing this office a copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the above-referenced project. It has been reviewed pursuant to responsibilities given to the Minnesota Historical Society by Minnesota Statutes 138.081 and 138 .61 and through the process outlined in Minnesota Rules 4410.1600. There are no properties in the project area that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places or included in our inventory. In the absence of reported properties, we have also evaluated the likelihood that unreported historic or ar- chaeological properties may be present. Although we cannot state with certainty that there are no significant unreported archaeological properties within the project area, we feel that the probability of such properties being present is low. With respect to historic properties, the late 19th century farmstead located in the center of the project area should be evaluated in order to determine whether it meets the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places . If it does, ap- propriate measures to avoid and/or mitigate any harm to the property should be in- corporated into the project. Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36CFR800, Procedures of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation for the protection of historic properties. If this project is considered for federal assistance, it should be sub- mitted to our office with reference to the assisting federal agency. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding our review of this project. Sincerely, '2> Dennis A. Gimmestad RECF•`'FD Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DAG:dmb MAY- 3 1991. cc: Leroy Nyhus, P.E. , Nyhus Engineering CITY OF SHAKOPEE= Box 317 , Henning, Minnesota 56551 # 3 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Nears Park Centre. '30 East Fifth Street. St. Paul. MN 55101-1634 612 291-6359 FAX 6/2 291-6550 77Y 612 291-0904 May 8, 1991 Lindberg S. EkoIa City of Shakopee 129 First Av. E. Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: EAW McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine Metropolitan Council District 14 Dear Mr. Ekola: Council staff has conducted a preliminary review of this environmental assessment worksheet to determine its adequacy and accuracy in addressing regional concerns. The staff review has concluded that the EAW is complete and accurate with respect to regional concerns and raises no major issues of consistency with Council policies. An EIS is not necessary for regional purposes. Staff notes, however, several technical problems with the EAW: 1. The specifications of the two ponds shown in the drainage report do not seem to be those indicated on map B of the plans. 2. The basin shown on the plans does not meet the design criteria for either proposed basin in the specifications of the report. Therefore, it cannot be expected to function correctly. 3. The basin shown on the plans is not presented in cross-section as indicated. 4. The report indicates that the wash water basin will have a sealed bottom, but no specifications are included to indicate the method or degree of sealing that will be provided. This will conclude the Council's review of the EAW. No formal action on the EAW will be taken by the Council. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Barbara Senness, Council staff, at 291-6419. Sincerely, Roger Israel, Director Research and Long Range Planning RI/kp cc: Bonnie Featherstone, Metropolitan Council District 111 14 • r, Jim Larsen, Metropolitan Council Staff • 4 , Lynda Voge, Metropolitan Council Staff '?,-- Barbara Senness, Metropolitan Council Staff 101 #1-1 PRIOR LAKE-SPRING LAKE WATERSHED DISTRICT JO; Don 0. Benson Scott-Rice Telephone Bldg. Staff Coordinator 4690 Colorado St. S.E. (612) 447-4166 Prior Lake, MN 55372 • It 13 May 21, 1991 Mr. Lindberg S. Ekola City of Shakopee 129 First Avenue E. Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: EAW for McKenna Sand and Gravel Dear Mr. Ekola: I have reviewed the above-referenced EAW for the proposed sand and gravel mine. My only comment is that a permit will be required from the Prior Lake/Spring J-Ake Watershed District. I think the exhibits contained in the EAW will be sufficient for District review. An application form can be obtained from Don Benson at the District office. We appreciate the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. En eers for the District Kevin C. Larson, P.E. • bt j idLe- C42/.6 S' T. • ._..• - A s Oi PRfo : ` "CELEBRATE PRIOR LAKE'S CENTENNIAL - 1991" J __ 41I.vNESo�` RP V ';rIs May 23 , 1991 MAY 2 41991 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Mr. Lindberg S . Ekola City Planner Shakopee City Hall 129 1st Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine, EAW comments. Dear Mr. Ekola, The City of Prior Lake has received the above referenced EAW and has the following comments: LAND USE: Prior Lake's Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1981 and the Zoning Code implementing the plan in 1983 . The areas adjacent to the mine are designated as agricultural in the plan and zoned A-1 agricultural in the Zoning Ordinance. It is anticipated that this will remain agricultural in the current comprehensive plan update. Consequently Prior Lake's 2010 urban service area will remain south of Co. Rd. 42 . It would appear that the mining operation will be concluded by the time Prior Lake considers the land between Co. Rd. 42 and the mining operation for the inclusion in urban services area. In the event the mine is still in operation at such a time, Prior Lake will seek mitigating measures to offset the negative impacts of noise, truck traffic, fumes, dust and pollution of the urban environment in areas adjacent to the mining operation. Prior Lake does not want urban land use patterns and investment in infrastructure to reflect the negative aspects of a gravel mining operation. Located adjacent to the west of the mining operation is the 160 acre Mdewakanton Sioux Indian Community consisting of 35 residential units. Eleven of the units are directly impacted by the everyday operation of the mine because of the proximity to the operation. Mitigating measures must be in place prior to the start up of the mining operation. LAND USE MITIGATING MEASURES : 1. ) When the two quarter/quarter sections lying directly to the south of the mining operation are included in the Prior Lake urban service area, then all truck traffic related to the operation must cease from using all sections of McKenna Road maintained and controlled by Prior Lake. In the event this 4629 Dakota St. S.E.. Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372 : Ph. (612) 4474230 ' Fax (612) 4474245 An Equal Ooeortuniry!Affirmetiue Action Employer occurs, all temporary access permits will be revoked. 2 . ) The planting plan on the berm facing the City limits of Prior Lake must be designed by a registered landscape architect and specifications on plant material must be included in the plan. The plant material must make an immediate impact with the following minimums: a. ) Evergreens - 6' minimum b. ) Deciduous - 2 . 5" caliper measured 12" above base c. ) Watering as required for first two years after planting. 3 . ) To reduce the influence of noise and to provide some relief from ubiquitous mining sounds emanating from the mine, the hours of operation must be confined to the hours between 7 : 30 a.m. and 6 : 00 p.m. The operation shall be closed on all weekends and holidays. TRAFFIC: Item 22 in the EAW suggests that peak ADT from the operation can result in 200 trips, which is one truck trip every 90 seconds between 7 : 30 a.m. and 6 : 00 p.m. Normal activity is anticipated to generate one truck trip every 11 minutes for the same period. The ADT is dependent on the construction activities in the region and length of the haul. Peak periods may last from as little as a few hours to several weeks. All traffic volume is scheduled to access the operation from Co. Rd. 42 via McKenna Road to the mine access road. Prior Lake will not agree to take all the traffic from the operation. The operation must be accessible from the north utilizing McKenna Road and the northerly mine access. The proposed volume of traffic from the mine as compared to Co. Rd. 42 is relatively low. The current traffic on Co. Rd. 42 is predominately passenger vehicles. The slow moving and accelerating trucks will add an undesirable component to the ever increasing volume of traffic on Co. Rd. 42 . The truck traffic from the mine to Co. Rd. 42 is the most visual daily reminder of the operation. The traffic transforms a tranquil low density rural environment to one out of human scale. Mitigating measures must include all elements and conditions which will comprise the residential character of the Mdewakanton Community and the agricultural district. TRAFFIC MITIGATING MEASURES : 1. ) All truck traffic from the mining operation must be kept from using the section of McKenna Road lying between two access points as shown on the EAW maps. 2 . ) The mine access road from the mine south to McKenna Road, must be paved to prevent dust from deteriorating the residential environment of the Mdewakanton Sioux Community. 3 . ) The applicant must pay for any improvements to Co. Rd. 42 as deemed appropriate by the City and County Engineers. 4 . ) Any sections of McKenna Road used by truck traffic from this operation must be upgraded to a standard considered safe and appropriate by the City Engineer of Prior Lake. 5 . ) A maintenance program for any sections of McKenna Road used by the mining operation must be in place prior to the operation and agreed to by the Prior Lake City Engineer. 6. ) The applicant must submit to the Prior Lake City Engineer a detailed plan on how internal site traffic is organized. 7 . ) Truck traffic must be allowed to use that portion of McKenna Road north of the northerly access drive of the mine. 8 . ) All access points to McKenna Road in Prior Lake will require a driveway permit from the City Engineer. The City Council of Prior Lake will consider the applications. 9 . ) Any grading in the City limits of Prior Lake will require a grading permit from the City Engineer. LAND REHABILITATION: If the mining operation is successful in securing all necessary permits and mineral is extracted over a period of time, the City of Shakopee should have in place guarantees for eventual rehabilitation of the mine. It is suggested that the City Council of Shakopee require a bond from the fee owner of the land in an amount sufficient to provide for the reclamation of the mine in the event the applicant does not. In the event you have any questions regarding these points, I would be happy to discuss them in greater detail. Sincerel /61 gVfIL Horst W. Gras Planning Dire for CITY OF PRIOR LAKE cc: Leonard Prescott, Chairman, Shakopee Sioux Community ik (to M�STATE OF t!Ir.' DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 500 LAFAYETTE ROAD • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55155-40 10 DNR INFORMATION (612) 296-6157 May 23, 1991 Lindberg S. Ekola 129 First Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW) Scott County, Minnesota Dear Mr. Ekola: The Department of Natural Resources has reviewed the above-named EAW; we offer the following comments for your consideration. Item 17 of the EAW should address conditions at the site during the non-operating season. We suggest that interim reclamation be practiced, so that slopes will be stabilized during spring run- off and erosion can be minimized. Regarding reclamation of the site for future use: 1. Future agricultural use The pit floor will be highly compacted by mining equipment and machinery. To restore the floor for agricultural use,physical treatments such as tilling or some other method of breaking up the soil may be required. The reclamation map shows that there will be a cropping sequence and that one of the crops to be grown on the reclaimed site is corn. We question the efficacy of growing corn during the first year of agricultural use. We suggest that during the first year a legume or cover crop be grown in order to augment soil nutrients. 2. Segregation of topsoil The EAW indicates that the topsoil will be segregated; will the subsoil be segregated as well? The area is currently steep and usually the topsoil is rather shallow in steep areas. Based on this, we question whether adequate topsoil will remain to reclaim the site. Without a good layer of topsoil, the site be cannot be successfully converted to agricultural use. 3. Progressive (sequential)reclamation The practice of sequential reclamation is emphasized and encouraged by the Department. We are pleased to see that the applicant intends to practice this type of reclamation. However, what is the rationale for the 15-acre reclamation threshold? This seems to be quite a large acreage relative to the life and size of the operation. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Lindberg S. Ekola May 23, 1991 Page 2 4. Berms Mining is to occur in three stages, with berms to be erected between each phase. What will happen to the berms when mining is complete. Will they be removed or will they be incorporated in future agricultural operations? Thank you for the opportunity to review this EAW. We look forward to receiving your responses to our comments pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, subparts 4&5. Please contact Rebecca Wooden of my staff, at (612)297-3355, if you have questions regarding our comments. Sincerely, Thomas W. Balcom, Supervisor Natural Resources Planning and Review Services Office of Planning (612)296-4796 c: Karen Bowen Steve Colvin Tom Lutgen Vicki Hubred Robert Welford,USFWS Gregg Downing,EQB David McKenna, McKenna Sand and Gravel Co. Bill Rudnicke,William R.Engelhardt Associates,Inc. #910201-01 EQB2/McKenna.doc SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 600 COUNTRY TRAIL EAST JORDAN, MN 55352-9339 (612) 496-8346 FAX (612) 496-8365 BRADLEY J.LARSON Highway Engineer DANIEL M.JOBE Asst.Highway Engineer-Design DON D. PAULSON Asst.Highway Engineer-Construction May 24 , 19 91 Mr. Lindberg Ekola City Planner City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MT 55379 Re : McKenna Sand & Gravel Mine Dear Lindberg: The Scott County Highway Department has reviewed the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the above referenced project as it affects the County Highway System. Based on the information provided and the proposed improvements noted for the CSAH 42/McKenna Road intersection (right turn/bypass lanes) , we have no objection to the proposal . If the project is approved, a permit will be required for the proposed work within CSAH 42 right-of-way. If you have any questions or would like any further information, please contact this office. Sincerely, 1 ' C V Bradley 45Pon, P .E . County Highway Engineer BJL/kmg cc,: Jon Westlake, Scott County Planning Director An Equal Opportunity/Afrmatiue Action Employer 8 YMay 29, 1991 BGG,{ . 70' DATE: R �,,�,'�' TO: Jon Westlake, Dir. Planning .4-10pAlt FROM: Michael Ryan & Allen Frechette -ft SCOTT COUNTY SUBJECT:BJET: McKenna Sand & Gravel Mine: EAW MEMORANDUM BACKGROUND: An EAW on behalf of McKenna Sand & Gravel Co. , prepared by Nyhus Engineering, April, 1991 was presented to our office for review. LOCATION: The proposed 80 acre site is located within Shakopee City limits: T 115 N, R 22 W, Sec. 22, W/2, NE/4, about 2 miles due • south of Dean Lake. COMMENTS: We have reviewed the McKenna proposal. The overall EAW appears t: be complete and in order. We have no objections to the proposal as described. - There are some minor differences between our soils map (we use the SC-Soils Atlas. Series 1955, No. 4) and that shown in the EAW, page 20. We think the McKenna data may come from the SCS maps, but no reference as to source is indicated. The material concerning groundwater, item # 20, shows a groundwater elevation ranging from 100' to 125' . Well logs # 1,2,& 3, we find reported water elevations of 120, 156, & 135' respectively. Given an average surface elevation of 878 MSL or (f.a.s.l. ) , we find the ground water level to be closer to 135' or 743 MSL. The SC-Geo Atlas, map C-1, pl. #4, Bedrock Topo. , shows bedrock at 750' . There is a downslope of the Lower Ordovician Age, Prairie du Chien Dolostone Formation, going from 7504 west of the site to 750- east-. f the site, leading to a major buried bedrock valley, bottoming in the Upper Cambrian Age, Franconia Sandstone Formation, about 2 miles to the east. Ths. Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer is expected to be the major aquifer impacted by the proposal. Excavation of mined materials down to a maximum depth of 55' (see page 7, item #6, seventh sentence) should leave 70' or more of glacial drift between the bottom of the excavation and the aquifer. The Minnesota Health Department recommends at least 50' or more. The proposal appears to satisfy this condition. /ew-mcken mp r. ,5:...,..-..1.- , --••7.. .,,,,:.,\_•t„;-;...v...:4 -... wr,c• i‘rs,„,--, , ,.-•-. Z ' '1!L •4r ) I vv. •;.••r---;;;;.1;,:' 7 •s•--..-"z''.7-4,6 6,.7.:' .?,.." - Av . ,--,- -..,-.>„...) ---r--„.-. 0.-ow .,,, ire 04. A-1111V....".-..2 '-:"7--`-"\ - .-r• •-•,... • ....., .......x.,..... , ,--- -. - , . ,..... ,i,,, t- .... q • t... '-',... 4.4-,•,. *-2,.. - , .. -.*.--. . - tie -'..z41? '..,"\- __+'-:-.•-4,;-c' -, .,- ---,?- -Q.,:: -• „... -_-, \.., . .- -• - -- -..--$ 1/4-- ---L-;.-•-•- -'.. 41454°. '..'41P ... '. -: h i -1. ,..• 2 < 42,. (.2; I. •N......_.- •••,... • ,t . -- _ •-•-;-: . .. , i. •s......... •-•••.,-.1•_•_4•••••••s• -, • ---__,.........:•,- _ • . _ : " -. Osa,,,z., . ..... ;'- ,4.'t..Z.V. •. ....k4 S, ".. ..'. 4. ' .•-.........;fr.. ,Ph.4,, ; .f.a_. •• 7••-4-Dt,lig. \,,...A...., . ,s . .. -2.,1.•4..-. \. .Z.7•!.., t.l.s. 7101% Ar• -.4.Y.:Me. . •'....f''',.,.••• -•-•411, _.''.• °"'"n li•• . i et'.,i. . .: 0 4:4, .k._'•N,..-:,V.,...' t-P.• lt '-...-:-•.--- 't;•• .7: & ...1,L j L. ',..S.1k... ....... ..7....... ':W.4-7.2..!..7-'--,Za• -404, -4 ,..11 ‘,-2.-.7 ,-.: - --", • ,••••-; ' "•••; "a-• .-...-. .- ...-;wr- ''.:26.:•,A,.e. ,-/Illw ..... '----.. :-. • l':-'''- -",t.Iin.L':-••.;•ts.,o, il-t-, -,4, ....., --.-z-: - . _ ""-•• •••4..'- '-. _.- 4., -- ...:,'N.:,..,04.1,_ _ .E.-.,•••ft,.? '7,...."-!...i--:. ‘`...;• -, -4-_-.:•,1,44,..-:-.1-.7-,_;::<--i, '-.I.:411.-,7:4•,- . - , . -... -7,--..,.. - -,-,-- • ,•• v.., /4,-.. _ - Akt;a11117.6*/,414..-- ...,he ...-__•:-.-.i. • -_..A Ar''): 'F'. :*•.--IeW, 1 ;-•-.--;:z741--. '--iwIt,,- ---, --/--- it ratik,!f. .cAs'..it-'7,..rp-,7A.,-.7,,,;(411.%,-- Iiihn.,:,--,--.Ty lik 4' 1.. . h?..7.,. :111P . ‘4".. \.& ' ..a.f'; --.%.•:. ,::: -- ' Ak: ior r 4..;$"3/ iiPle.-'t i- 4.:;4*.1.4r:f;.•;.t.:),14.141W.v:"4. .4.4 - 4.4--tti6 . .,..NN:c - --%0------sszi:-..ay.,qt-.5,.,,,L.-, :p.4.,5-.c-z7,...T.,::i.. .,_ _- . ..,_ ,.....-. - .17..,, -• _- .4., . ...1.. -:isi: -=X--;.' c;:!•-:•71:__ 1,..._.„14-11111E41-.;_;-....'Th.;1-.-c,=c. . ,-; 'eW-t t.74.,,,.; -• II,% ,i7.,ntee t't„i.."...4:,%,*-. 4 i-- - -" , # :'...", 44.-4 X J - '..V.,,,..-'.:?1;•• .i.-2"-,,,-1/4-',N--....fl.": l'"4, •i• t 1- -4 -.-• - 4A-• • 1,,,.,,,.. ,..: .•_,_.0.*• 4.74,:.'effieoall- *--.-7.-.1s..4-:-.>"--7;19114;.E. , -i,:_f : `"'• r`..::.:.-4.4....4--• -sc..'•-•''---i-'';'" - -.,. 41(..„,-ilfiLL'...•7,0.1:;.••" --•., ... .1.`:'..1.....,..;••%-•.- l• - . .4.k. . - 4 -9,-, -r.•p . ....: • ,‘.,,,f-t-FAF.....: - -.:7t.r.'.0....•;:t it.444.:,7:::: •''.- ---.. 7." 1 ... ;: .....- ,-,2..4.--41yr•--•-F•.•`..-:.'-., M.....64, ;7:;•:...1 .. -•tr' ) :••••:.... - •::,it-iiK.- ...-.•7•2-"... ..=-----1' e % --'::"'-•--Aft • - '0 -11111.)... N.,-..• ".."-'_i!i:P ...,.._- P?' .. *.e:s.Z... ..-- •-•* -..: - • • i ..."It,' .•10-1N.---',-,7,!..„--:,-at:•• • -....444 . - ..,,•., •.,.....it.,„ 5-'•-••- :-..,,ir, :....::,,42:14.77._ ----"'-1 ....-..4 I.- ... . , ..a.. ......---•._ .....-t--,..--_ wens, slt-f - le ar,..--- -- ':•---'''.-- i:ilif t...:.,i :.- ''',a k - ....- •it=gi -.-. - .-.:.: -::zy. -.---. ..=-- MALX:-44.-;V-:-•-•-•.71rt.,•V.--7- "1.- .dillt„..•-•; .Y. ,..4 :-- - -,0.61-iiiii.: ,..,t---',4!-z- - - , : •. ,-_-.,ws,,...4. .,. .,_-....: ,..,..c.t...-,,.:1-4-,....: _ ,,,,,,i-oga..----4.:_li.,:i. .....1 - ..-:•-..'r... - 4,.0. `•': . " "Z 0 ..." -'- '• i -., .,,,, ...-47.1,..-..,-.....---.-,4----.,...... • o---..-.."...z- . .-*...... ..1-- .- .-a-'5- --1.1.! • -----.(-- - 'I -.11....-.....:40100. . ; %443,4 t.. flf„*.-i.C.---.:':.•/;;-=...-110;lrPt.git -aie------------ - --. -.. ------ . . - ---„,„..-- . . . .._.,......„...„. ...,,.,.•..;C.v..--,:'•:,---7--,-,...•--12 .... --•ma•ik....741-:.-4.....^,,:•14.20, [Xt., ): 0-...-, -t•••,.... -t.f... •• k.-001,-:.•,t.‘ _ - F---si•e-7'-‘-_,..... .e..-- '...1/4-7 _,-,-..:..---7.---... ..;-.).-:;)Nt:-..-iii, • 6 ,,„-_-,„.?••••- 1 .-• zs.,.,-- - ., --1-4., .. ., 1/4 ...÷------40r-teit --:-.-.- ......,-1-fr."- .....--..-.--zrz:_.--:,. i ..... -,..10 -‘r-.7.7- .: ----.. n •' t .. , -.17 - - 2,. .-...a.,..:.,_;;;Ik-f.. . - .....,-.Wi t.k....-, . .ji.....z,'-'4#•a",...Z.7 i ' -.A,,,,e..•.- -,, . 43 ta ;.••••• .T-.1."!..1.. . • c..-.:Nii,....,,,,ia ... .;:,-.......: . -4,, i%:,:vjp...1.4%.„. .. - ---- .,.. . 4 .- II 7....„.„. ....,:-. "-...-...i'-'-‘,...4..s....• • ! 1.4.--.z.;....,-.... •.. .....2,,-(...- , , • rotztr. ,.. - •••• .1' • „ - - • ,•- *"... _--...! !a;-'.. , 1 AY" • --'4-077;•••`.10... *o.,.+-,.. , 4%.,_.1b,_- 1 -->,,Th. .•,-• -7...1.-,---; .•,•••-• •t4s-.4 4.•- •.i.7"•-• ,;• i a - At‘•. 1% "a . •.-c".-" ...vs..- p 161131'5_.4 "rir.,ctil".?".ik_ k '4,'", '' - -... ' '''.-" Al..741.14: ''''; .• •,.'''' 1 11 :1" -•••- •. -, - r.o,' < .• ar. . '17.......7t.:f:... ..:•'ill .f.....•, ...a.:•••,..A..i.......-7'"1/46....%..... .-- - „.1.X • ‘J ... ..•;X ' ''t4144;i‘tS.2:."4'.4.-.-47'.•47.:'.::::::: :7 0 W ......•, ,ef.f .S: AN......,.....16;"...‘' .. 4 •••-.. r•-...,,T .I. al‘ . 4 ... - ''.. . •-'..:ir .. --,-..7.::..'--r:.... rti: -.2....--0.•••:01,- "--; 'ir()TIVIM . _........,.c _ z _• ..c.:....4.-.....,.,.. w .• • _ . . _ ._ ...,...: ....-- --.. ..-:,--"v-c.,---."--..11•64:,....- r ,-,. ---- ••• VA 6 4,....--_....., ''' vi - -.- V:4-1.-S.r"- . .. , . .. .Z.,•',41.-'...i" Atets.....tie:111,. -:"' .."' -.47-1-.5... , .-tr • .AV:...illt ... ..•••:-.• ' .6 Z 4. • - . • . .-. 0 a •I'ist.-::f.,Fii.'- eirfkL."•:'-"- -4 eatt-1 Z 17:trAPL .••:...i.i X • • •.- `..1-...... '''' , ... 111111e.r..---- --•"."-.42621"--- ir".....rs '-,..--:44M•17" . c•I 1;41- -. -, ::;-'•• - .'%ipt- ?...,4rP ., . r I‘• FO'i. ..,- -'11'''''r :2Z-fir-.;z2ri,.. '-..- ,4k• -•-- I- -..... 1 qi 4:•^:li•--••11 ,1 . 151-`46, . ' ':,k3 ...:?-: ;isewrit-.0 ...:Y64,1V0';:-. Z =-z.,...t.N.,. g-• -'No:- : --3,t -, \z.• ..0taliyldi -...4,74114,_ r. ir-4.4.7_1.0,„..isf .r. ,••.K__•40.1,pc,..../•i•l;,-., .-.1.;.= -....:. ... -v. = t- 4!-.11. . w ,••zipFTE ..7:-":•:--:.-;,:...ct"....fotire..an.. . S. •-,t1,-ili •••,....,,,g -Ittio.,..,!... •'!...., -• IOW- qk -1.••--:',;., " 1,-,,i .---- ..•:',1,17 - .;•& -4. .7't 4FL-;.-':.-.•'''::';•Zag•r- IQ L---e..:•-- :.•Os' • C.) _7_, )q..... t ! -., •.:- 4‘..474-..tiff•';.vertm,... p - "s•Atr.t•••--;- •,'i ,,k•-t ,,_441A1,;.•,_-.•. A-Z• • --,i__%,. .7-1 -__.-.A. 0 ....,-A \ • 1 , .. •-;,...-14, _ ---1:20,=-.... .er, , ..,,,fe:11. . ,‘0.,;-•:::atiev. -:::-._„7„- - it„...,,A*:-„,„.: i,.....,_,,, -,::,. ..,.., -3.:. „„..,„.,..;_,._ :. „L....a,-ri. ;,•.'""; 4.4 .4v,11 r-f'4.774---- V- ' .4.-- ---"1-•••• er• ---<-1 --- -.- :4. -- --•:::.: ti,t 0 r.•:,.....;,-...--*: lc. C...) cr) .._ -s 4.-ir 1 --. .VT.'s- ,4r ,t' ', AC , , L, ...T.„.. , ) di -... ..•41 ....0,-›. /6.. ltr..-... .., _.--. .... ., .41-- :- • i 7•- 1.•••••-: ...::;.•:•.A:445 NrC,I. ' - (I) 4-A% .T. *L'/' It A••• ilitr W. aiZill-"V....4 .r.:C...‘\7 - 4 i ..-.."--:::r-c7‘..--....--4:r,t-...:),..4,--* ,--, 4. --*--, 1 - ' .- ..• i .1 • iiP.i ..-^". .:11111,i ..116...., wilealows", . ::,:.''''.; 1... !".."-...;Atit f:-r'..,......1,-...1.1.7.*jilliklia 0.•-i.. z •••, EV,'•,'. 1. . li .0. t' •, . .512_.,„,V4f4C .........71kitigallthl ..6,1,.....414, A-2.\.e., 4.0....k.- ''',....Ae• ....s.1-- -....14- NIEL• 'fttiON.,..74.•• - • . 1- , 1,116.1,44, :•,-mir-- , . ..,=,.-_e.-.... `3:l'Af n 4-tft-...% „.. 'ir./4:,: '.. . ae.:•::* . ."- - 11.1=". '''"11,..,. . A '-i.•';- 71. f -'1..01' 'Ir.. ' a N 1...NI C.:;-'-...: ..• - 1.4*. • 4 -...... - ,•„,•...:a•--..4,1-..,7 4i...i. - o. ze z 'Fir-- ., r T:s_..1:;;Sci.4...-, --if It - .- . A.-. _- ..--_----_,_.--•---:-.,---;•7 r- ...jipoo - 0. •-- - , Ir.,-..e..--- in-, :..--•,.....,,„...al•,„,„.r•,".-3 •%*-o0.:,•: --' •.• -,7- .....7.sc3.1 I% • oo'rc• . ..4...„ -...c,„ • ,ell. •...:.--'7i.;:t.--!"kr.,.1 Iniirtf •••••••,,'",,7,. all'4111111. .4.3;-'1.• '.4I•-' .....:-•.-;.:---,-..----_-_7'.-4 Z):.0 ' ...W.411gri... --a. .''''''.e.tk . ...r.•., ' '..44 ..i' .:1.4••:..7.....7.111e.. ' -I' ... ..• 7.1.2s„2: .'''''-.V.0 „ . , . . .... p,-N--1,-•-•;:-.1.- . -: ., -' •:...; z A :At f•eolL..,- "--ir•._--7. • • _.,', -•!- .--•--.::--..":„ . .. v•...-rotat • 4.- ' ' •-11. e • -...F•T •' -- '"--_:---..• -.`,",--- :4- ,,,,,,,,.... ,-,,...,, , ..,„,. • .. .__.- ,,,.-:_;.:,. .. .4. . , , ...„.... , ' zl ..; ,- ., - - - ,, -., .,. , ,,, ..;.,- 4.,-.„,0 , . . . .„, ..-....„-, .0, - = 2 x ..._ .,..,i.._ • ._ • ... _ ..„--;_;........,.., .,;.,),.......6 . --"F-t-s" :, APrala _... • ..... .:000,•-•."4•••••••- illo•'••`•'i..5.--7.006•-^an'... ...? Ai '. ............ _.,.....-- ' ..t". ...-'.. ..;. T *PaltipallAtr7,-.‘..-?7-7‘'-1. ,M-is..•-•-•"-- -•si LIM -..,,•,-''''-7- "7.kt.... 1 . 1 I i k.0:42."-.71--. `<1 •- CN 1 '.' '- .-_'..r•-•.;‘,:z--4±',,,c;2?".0.i .1 - - ' _ , , •_,:-',•••,... 1--•-• '1„..,1 . . ,,..-A,..:-...,...".•...f.,•4.,e.,,,ty../. .se-M•s.- •- • 'TS •• ,...74. Vo ••• t•-, •••. . s •- --:-....•-7.,,,-.' ,-4.:-...-.- - A. I '. k ' ( •' \ ..t •,- •... ,„:...,,,. Ili - _ . t.... • . .,- . 7' .. :::•-5-'s-',•-• E, a. ? ,-.... fv-.....,„:„., . >,_... . •,,, , .4 .;:,,,,,k ,T, A ' 1 : ...*-..... • t I -. . .-"-:.-. ..-----.=:4..,-- 1 =1 I gr--,-*..el,47-I."'• ‘..". .224:.‘- I ... .„;:c ....I i ... kteP l' re4Z2.- -J .. - z ..4 ,_-_:„..--;._,..,...1,--- : . - , .,::::!...,,,,-„ve..,......1....,., .,,,„2 ., • I'ttla' togiidIA;;-: .„- . .t.t. -_- .- U4 i 74Z.' -.-:..--.-.-.3_:_'-:: :-':••-• - ‘,..- .• 'r.:::":..••';&:.4 ;.:-..`r7f.i. r" ,A.) 7: Ow, • r..0 -‘ 5..4;144.1.... ". .., ..,_ ,..o.......... , 0 ; 0. I,.':• ..3,7... 4' ,_ 7,7, Nr,.. ....:,- ....0 -0.--,Vatr-194-er t- :-.4p I . • 1 N ••••‘ . -• VINV.4c,„. ......:41/2„-•••-,.. - ,--1,. far-0- "Pi . i s,.......c.--...:.:-.v.. , 4 • Q..,..k..t,....-4.0 ..41itr a -4.- riaTi: A.5."1'. .4.7.‘'°f":5"....itS:. •-• 3.Thr. .• ••••• ,, • ... ._,Ojr-r/7Xtat.. . . t"':.'...,2.,... 1 i,,,•-• N sil Fe 41.. • 3'•*44,-?...." itior u • . t,4 •,:rr•-•"Gtrit.. a 1• r. lir ....s.tr- t. .-::". 4-.....:-4.7:.. ...V] P -,: ., •"••• . ' 2 77 -.....451 (CPI$I 11115W4 - , 1 s p•. it je/ : ,, 44. ---431 fa* !Ili 4 4/I '.. 1 it"--' • '41;'"?• - 0,,:- •• • • P_...-= •/"."- kA .•• „....• or., eiWit ,..i . -m1 f.: - i / .. •.=•••••• - ', - / ? ,.,' •fl ••1 ii:Ackliti.-....t. tc. 1. . . z .1 1 ..... Nil 4 A ft,' . a fl° . „ . -•".. soirkruiget,.. •2 4111(C.2_,i'air, ;;,.--.0•.v*:.:.' ;1;4.11P 7,..i' r : 1...‘if' .*- . _. 4 •'-- '271 .(1'..rizi ..';." 76-,-......i•S' - ; ':'•••est .1":; "ruo illik14„ ..4*..i:,*"'":"-. 1-c,545i1;;;/%."4-* ''-'•\1 '4) ' -Sae..- , . 8,,,- ...,,-.• x-,44 ‘r -,;.... . sii w. we -no.....,•1.........z..-...4.,-....i-...;... <- ..- . if,. . N :.-4- :‘.11C-.11r.;- •t• Id ... ive ... egg• - ••.!if •t•ez.. . . • - - - I. tor. ••• 1:•,.., • .1,.. .r,;..-. '.'ea. 1 - :***1.1at: ' lel • • '03 -' ,:,, t•-•:,1 4 lio -1 '4•!..e' "*"-•.:--C-"' - '''''''-,r i k._ _.,PA•j•-.. . .-----, NEZElb• _- .7r. -.21PY1 ••til‘i ..,, P. ---N1)41"-?....----,-,T: wiper vitibl var., -... - "rb i ;:. • I '--.:711.W.- -.°‘. frall":-..,,,IrNk'Z 1 Y.".' '''.1-'7.77.-.1 % 1._ 4°-.PL•16%;C:;"0/10, ' -allbSt AA-.(- % -• .2;" 7 s;- • - -:. .:...1..... ....!'••.;4242.4,,.., '•--‘41'I4.-.11 - - : 4...e: it rl to" t. . itt. 'II- - .z•••• ...:,... 11-w..----:-: •:;-ff - ,..: -...-,... Idr• 1,--.2411-•... - 41....- A. ,1 l'; '....-1r - L...47.......---.4-:...,---....,. ......ktil:------- s_.......K..* . -..--.11707"....rik.'-_,I . r.-• .,111111'7,- •--• --ts - 4.:::.:: • . ... """ - •4,-_,,i---.."-jai ."--..-.."."4.111 75:Lie N. ..141464.4. '......: - . Ilf"I''.---,4,,v.) rip":- I , ep. ......„ .• _.. .. ..,....;;:r4' - " • t.,, • •r- ,'',:e -•-• : • - /7.-4,•:-.7-t--.*:. '1,r-Alfh-w(41-1\ • ..-..A: -,-,-----ft. , .. - Om 7 ..‹.-:".•-tr , ---. . ... : - • --•- 1,...,„ „,./..'i ... . ..m.. .-.-"'• , .. .11F4-.- " --- . • goli,ar„„_„,- . ,--. - „1 t:-.. y . 4...--: ...-...1. - , , 4.- s: r ' '41. • '''k\ '4,>'` C2 -4 A . Z. Q ..:•*" - pp 7. --= ••••••=.0e' ..-: - 0-7- N1-9 6-----" - . .. • c v-, 1 -- - c g - . 0 4 . al ....1, 140(,... .• .. I . * I ; , . ,:'.. /14. 7.1% '* . ' "1". • ..'!,-..-A • 7. •- --o, -. . . ---_ ,, -- _.„.. , 1 , .. ...,. - ,, it ..... ....c......,J3 ...b....„.../u,„ ,:._ ,.... .4.04....- _...... were: ..........4... /....„.... - -..9 -., , , , ,- , ,. ... .. . a I - 4. - - ,. - :: - ..e ' ' •• ••:%;"••••?**-- Oil•.le_ 4°' 1 Mt-"v-..g1 ., ,• -W-..---- ---' s' •1 - ;iii ' . .-:"p'• •-\\- i.iz-- - _ 1 __. . • '-c2 _ . :::;\-....4 ',. l --:;•,e-4.11.=----.17.--. ' .1-1._ ,A, ,-'1.-- ---:-• :IOWAN • ..-.--. - ..... 'L laalfS) I-.' z _.„______ SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY 2330 Sioux Trail N.W.. Prior LakeMinnesota 35372 Tribal Office 612) 445-8900 FAX: (612) 445-8906 PKp411OA, S' OFFICERS w} LEONARD PRESCOTT Chauperson ALLENE ROSS (`I, ,I,. Vico Chmrperson ' MELVIN CAMPBELL SR. � SerretmyiTreowm i It �" May 29, 1991 City of Shakopee 129 First Avenue East Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Attention: Mr. Lindberg S. Ekola • Re: Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the Proposed McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine, Shakopee, Minnesota Dear Mr. Ekola: The Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community ("SMSC") occupies a reservation, one hundred sixty acres of which are located immediately adjacent to the westerly boundary of the McKenna's project. This property (the "SMSC Reservation") currently contains approximately 42 dwellings which house 7'7 adults and 33 children. SMSC is extremely concerned about the effect this project will have on the environment and offers the following comments on the EAW. We trust that you will carefully consider these comments (and your responses thereto) when you make your decision as to the need for an EIS. INADEOLIACY OF EAW; SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS The EAW is inadequate (as more specifically addressed below) because it fails to include information needed to determine the potential for, or significance of, certain environmental impacts. This project will potentially significantly affect several aspects of the environment. The Environmental Quality Board Rules define "environment" to include ambient noise, air, water, flora, fauna, land and man—made or natural features of historic, geologic, or aesthetic significance. I. Impact on Ambient Noise Levels. Significant noise levels will be generated from several activities—operation of gravel mining equipment, gravel crushing, screening and processing equipment, conveyers used to stockpile gravel, gravel being loaded into trucks, trucks entering, leaving and maneuvering within the site and heavy gravel truck traffic on adjoining City of Shakopee May 29, 1991 Page 2 public roads. Trucks on and off the site are of particular concern since their operation generates considerable noise—acceleration and gear shifting of heavy load trucks; back up warning beepers; etc. The effect of machinery noise upon nearby residents is exacerbated by the vibration that accompanies this noise. A. Inadequacy of maps. The maps accompanying the EAW in response to Question No. 5 are inadequate to enable EAW reviewers to assess the distance between the above-described noise and vibration generating activities and the nearest homes on the SMSC Reservation. EAW Guidelines require that maps show "a graphic close up of the project in sufficient detail to identify key physical features" including roads, utilities, buildings, drainage structures, cut and fill areas, materials or waste storage areas. Of the above-described on-site noise and vibration generating activities, the maps show only the main access road location and the location of the crusher in phase I. The EAW is, therefore, inadequate to enable a reviewer to asses noise levels at the nearest receptor. The response to Question No. 25 says that the applicant will install on site circular truck routes to minimize truck back-up noise, but the maps do not show the number or location or give the reviewer any information to assess the extent to which these routes will mitigate the noise level at the receptor. A detailed plan for on site traffic for all phases of the project should have accompanied the EAW. We question the accuracy of the statement in the response to Question No. 9 that "the distance from the aggregate processing area to the nearest residence . . . is approximately 1,000 feet." The measured distance on Map B from the phase I crusher location to the nearest depicted home appears to be 850 feet or 15% doser than the stated 1,000 feet. What is the location of "aggregate processing equipment" other than the crusher? Where will these activities be located in phases II and III. Is the map accurate? At the March 7, 1991, Shakopee Planning Commission meeting regarding the conditional use permit required for the project, the applicant's engineer stated that the scale of certain of McKenna's maps was not accurate. Map B should be complete and accurate. City of Shakopee May 29, 1991 Page 3 B. General inadequacy of response to permit question; Compliance with noise standards. The response to Question No. 8 is inadequate in that it states that the need for MPCA permits will be determined as a part of the EAW process. It is the responsibility of the RGU to provide the information called for in the EAW form. Failure to provide such information about the project deprives EAW reviewers of their right and opportunity to fully assess and comment upon the project during the 30—day review period. The EAW does not cite any basis for the determination in the response to Question No. 25 that "typical mining equipment generates 88 dBA measured at 50 feet from the source." The accuracy of this information is critical since it presumably will form a part of the basis for determination by the MPCA and the City of Shakopee of whether or not the project will meet applicable MPCA and City ordinance noise standards. As mentioned above, other information needed to adequately determine whether this project will meet applicable noise standards is missing—i.e. MPCA and City noise standards are phrased in terms of maximum noise levels at the nearest receptor; information about the distance between each noise source during each phase and the corresponding nearest receptor is inadequate. Any MPCA comments to the EAW regarding noise standards might differ if the EAW fully and accurately set forth the information required by the EAW form. C. Inadequacy of information on berm landscaping. The response to Question No. 9 says that the landscaping on the berms will help shield noise. However, the EAW contains no specifications as to the spacing, density or height of the plantings, the soil medium of the berm or the post planting maintenance plans. The berm landscaping should be tall enough and dense enough to have an immediate and significant mitigating effect. It can be expected that many of the plantings will die if planted in clay soil. There should be a landscape design by a registered landscape architect and a requirement for financial guarantees to ensure the long term viability of the plantings. City of Shakopee May 29, 1991 Page 4 Furthermore, there should be a requirement that the berm and landscaping be installed prior to commencement of operations. D. Accuracy of trip generation figure; nature of trucks. The response to Question No. 22 states that the maximum average daily traffic will be 200 trucks in the peak construction season. This determination is based upon the applicant's proposal to mine 1,000,000 cubic yards of gravel in 10 years. The EAW contains no information on borings or other geological basis for the determination that this site will produce only 1,000,000 cubic yards. Has this determination been verified? The accuracy of this figure is critical because, if the site yields greater amounts, the traffic (and impacts created thereby) may be greater and/or the life of the project may be longer. If the traffic is greater, the assumptions in the EAW regarding noise levels from trucks are inaccurate. There is no indication that the site will be restricted to • single unit trucks. "Double bottoms" (trucks with trailers) are believed to generate more noise. E. Validity of assumption that all trucks will be routed south. The response to Question No. 9 says that truck traffic impacts on the SMSC Reservation will be minimized because all trucks will be routed to County Road 42 via the south mining access road. SMSC questions the validity of this statement because it seems highly unlikely that the City of Prior Lake will agree to handle all of this project's truck traffic. The response to Question No. 22 says that the applicant expects that the trucks will have a southerly destination. Is the compass direction of the project's market predictable over the life of the project? F. Hours of operation. The EAW mentions no limitation on hours of operation. To minimize noise and other impacts on residents of the SMSC Reservation and other surrounding properties, hours of operation should be limited to 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, holidays excluded. G. Security Concerns. After operating hours, gravel pits often attract uninvited noise producing activities such as target practice, dirt bikes and teenage partying. An on duty security guard should be required to prevent vehicular and pedestrian access. City of Shakopee May 29, 1991 Pages H. Improper characterization of adjacent land use. The response to Question No. 9 indicates that adjacent land use is low density residential and agricultural. Although the SMSC Reservation now contains 42 dwellings, SMSC's zoning plan for this area permits one dwelling per acre. Given recent renewed interest in the preservation of Indian culture, it is quite possible that the residential population will significantly expand over the life of the McKenna's project (the next 12 years). Houses in greater number may be located nearer to the project than indicated in the EAW. Even if it is determined that noise levels measured at the currently existing nearest receptors meet City and MPCA standards, will noise levels measured at these future home sites meet standards? Unlike the typical person seeking a house site, Mdewakanton Sioux Indians desiring to live on a Mdewakanton Sioux reservation cannot simply find a different place to live which is not adjacent to a gravel mining operation. IL Impact on Air. A. Dust. This project will generate large quantities of dust as a result of traffic on dry, unpaved roads, the loading and conveying of gravel and wind blowing dust off trucks, machinery, mined areas and stock piles. As is the case with noise impacts (discussed above), the assumptions in the EAW about the amount of dust created generally by the site's activity level and specifically by the site's truck traffic level may be inaccurate if the assumption about this site's gravel production potential of 1,000,000 cubic yards is inaccurate. Also, as is the case with noise impacts, the assumption that traffic impacts on air will be minimized by southerly truck routing is suspect. The inadequacy of the maps is again problematic because they do not show the site's internal traffic layout, the location of all phase I machinery or the location of any machinery or stock piles in phases II and III. The EAW states that the maximum height of stock piles will be 25 feet. The adequacy of this height limitation should be discussed in terms of the location of the stock piles in each phase. The response to Question No. 9 says that the landscaping on the berms will help shield dust and pollution. As mentioned above, the EAW does not contain adequate information to address concerns about the timing of installation, the quality and the long term viability of the berm landscaping. The inadequacy of the response to question No. 8 is again apparent as the EAW contains no analysis of whether this project will meet MPCA City of Shakopee May 29, 1991 Page 6 standards regarding fugitive particulate matter. The response to Question No. 27 merely states that the applicant will have to be aware and comply with state air quality regulations. B. Air contaminants (including dust) generated by stationary sources. Minnesota Rules, Part 7001.1210 requires sand and gravel operations (except those producing less than 150,000 tons of product per year) to obtain a stationary source air emission facility permit. Such a permit would presumably regulate all air contaminants (including dust and exhaust fumes and odors) emanating from the site's stationary sources including the crusher, the conveyers and the dust control chemicals. The EAW contains no discussion of this permit requirement and its applicability to this site, even though the Rules specifically refer to gravel operations. There is no discussion of the exhaust from the fuel used by the crusher or other equipment. The EAW indicates that only • EPA and MPCA approved chemicals will be used for dust control. However, certain chemicals which are approved due to their limited potential to contaminate ground water have the unpleasant side effect of emitting odorous gases. C. Vehicle related air contaminants. The conclusion in the EAW that an indirect source permit is not required for this site may be different if the assumption about this site's gravel production potential of 1,000,000 cubic yards and the resulting trip generation figure are inaccurate. The EAW Guidelines (see comments to Question No. 23) indicate that, even if an indirect source permit is not required, a project may nevertheless require an estimate of likely air quality impacts if it contributes to traffic congestion. The unsubstantiated trip generation methodology in the EAW projects a maximum average traffic count of 200 trucks per day, but there is no discussion of how many trucks may be present at peak traffic times•on any given day. Has there been an analysis of the combined effect of the project's truck traffic and traffic from the race track, from Valley Fair and/or the SMSC casino? There is no indication of the speeds at which the trucks will travel or of weight loadings or whether "double bottoms" (trucks with trailers) will be prohibited. Acceleration lanes for trucks to gain speed before joining traffic should be required. Truck lanes should also be required on hills. Otherwise, bulky, slow moving gravel trucks in heavy traffic will contribute to traffic congestion and impact air quality. City of Shakopee May 29, 1991 Page 7 III. Impact on Water. A. Effect of project's water use on availability of water in SMSC wells. There are 8 drinking water wells located on the SMSC Reservation. Six of those wells are located in the northerly 80 acres which are across McKenna Road from the project. Three wells are located along the easterly boundary of the SMSC Reservation and are especially near to the project. The response to Question No. 13.b says that water will be used for dust control and aggregate washing. Appropriation of additional water for dewatering purposes is not mentioned. Presumably, the applicant concludes that dewatering the pit will not be required based upon the assumption that the water table is lower than the area where mining activity will occur. What is the basis for the stated depth of the water table? Is it a reasonable conclusion that dewatering will not be necessary? The EAW contains no information as to the amount of water the project will use for dust control and aggregate washing and no information as to the rate of pumping and the direction of sub-surface water flow. There is inadequate information as to the depth and location of wells on the SMSC Reservation. SMSC is very concerned that the project's water pumping will create a zone of influence that will significantly decrease water availability in its wells. The attachments to the EAW include only one well log in SMSC's name. SMSC needs assurance that the location and depth of all its wells have been considered and that this project will not affect its water supply. A quantitative analysis of this project's impact on ground water levels should be provided as a part of the environmental review process. Even if it is determined that the project's water appropriation will not affect existing SMSC wells, will it affect ground water wells serving future home sites? As mentioned above, unlike the typical person seeking a house site, Mdewakanton Sioux Indians desiring to live on a Mdewakanton Sioux reservation cannot simply find a different place to live with water availability not affected by a gravel mining operation. B. Effect on water quality. 1. Environmental hazards due to past land use. The well log for applicant's Well No. 4 refers to an underground fuel oil tank located 35 feet north of Well No. 4. It is not clear from the well City of Shakopee May 29, 1991 Page 8 location map whether this tank is located in an area that will be mined. The well map shows more than one well on the applicant's property. Any unused wells must be sealed so that they do not remain as possible entrance points for ground water contamination. Has the property been examined for other environmental concerns due to past land use? Fuel storage tanks, household dumps and contamination associated with farm equipment maintenance and the storage, transferral and disposal of agro chemicals are common environmental concerns on property that has been in agricultural use. 2. Substances used, and wastes produced, by the project which may potentially contaminate soil and ground water. The EAW says that there will be no on site storage of fuel for machinery. However, there is no discussion of how the crusher and other machinery will be fueled. We guess that the crusher will use diesel fuel. If there is no separate fuel storage tank on site, either the crusher must include a large integral tank or there will be frequent site visits by fueling trucks with the potential for spillage during fueling. Will measures be taken to prevent fuel from contaminating soil and ground water? How will machinery be maintained and repaired? Will oils and other hazardous substances used in maintenance be stored on site? If so, will they be stored in an environmentally appropriate manner? Will explosives be used or stored on site? What chemicals will be used for dust control? How will they be stored? Where will the recycle pond be located in each phase? The response to Question No 19.a says that there has been no determination of the quantity of the waste water stream from aggregate washing. Is the maximum size of the recycle pond sufficient to handle this unestimated volume of waste aggregate washing water? The response to Question 19.b says that the silt from the recycle pond will be spread on site. What is the estimated volume and composition of the silt? Will the silt contain any contaminants? The reclamation plan should include either the sealing of the water well or an appropriate maintenance plan so that it does not become an access point for water contamination. Although the EAW says that the direction of surface water flow is northerly and easterly, there is no indication of the direction of ground water flow. SMSC is City of Shakopee May 29, 1991 Page 9 particularly concerned about potential ground water contamination because of the applicant's engineer's comment at the March 7, 1991, Shakopee Planning Commission meeting that ground water flows from the project westerly to the SMSC Reservation. The gravel to be removed by this project now serves as a natural filter for the water that ends up in SMSC's wells. What is the effect of removing this natural filter? 3. Effect on quantity and quality of storm water runoff. The response to Question No. 10 indicates that the site's impervious surfaces will increase by 500% as a result of the project. Is the on site sedimentation pond adequate to control sedimentation, phosphorus and additional run off? What contaminants may be present in the site's storm water discharge? Has the impact on Dean Lake, Pike Lake and the Minnesota River been adequately analyzed? When it issued new storm water regulations last November, the United States Environmental Protection Agency considered potential contamination of storm water run off from gravel pits significant enough to expressly include this industry by SIC Code (#1442) in the group of industries required to obtain NPDES permits for storm water discharges. There is no discussion of the anticipated impact of these regulations on the project. IV. Impact on Flora and Fauna. A. Effect on wildlife habitat. EAW Guidelines say that Questions 10 and 11 are included in the EAW form to insure an assessment of wildlife habitat. SMSC is very concerned about this project's impact on wildlife habitat because it will affect the wildlife on the SMSC Reservation. Residents of the SMSC Reservation now enjoy the presence of wood ducks, deer, birds, rabbits and squirrels. Residents also trap small game and hunt rabbits, squirrels, pheasant and other upland game on the SMSC Reservation. The response to Question No. 10 shows that, even after reclamation, the project will cause a 69% decrease in wooded/forest areas and a 100% decrease in brush/grassland. Obviously, no wildlife habitat will exist during mining operations. Even if there is phased reclamation, the noise and dust from the remaining phases will have an adverse effect on wildlife. What financial guarantees will be required to insure that the reclamation City of Shakopee May 29, 1991 Page 10 plan will be implemented? Has the reclamation plan been analyzed from the standpoint of pre—project/post—project wildlife habitat? The EAW states that the project will last from eight to twelve years. It may last longer if the assumption about this site's gravel production potential of 1,000,000 cubic yards is inaccurate. Will the current level of wildlife return after this site is reclaimed or will its destruction be an irreversible environmental effect of this project? The response to Question No. 11.a says that the vegetation on the berm will provide some habitat. As mentioned above, however, the EAW does not contain adequate information to address concerns about the timing of installation, the quality and the long term viability of the berm landscaping. We question the accuracy of the statement that the site includes no wetlands. At the March 7, 1991, Shakopee Planning Commission meeting regarding the conditional use permit for this project, the applicant's engineer stated that an intermittent stream runs through the property. The stream is not shown on the maps included in the EAW. How significant is the stream to wildlife? It is apparent from the EAW that the RGU has not adequately addressed the quality and value of the project site's wildlife habitat. B. Effect upon flora on SMSC Reservation. Residents on the SMSC Reservation engage in the traditional Indian practices of gathering wild mushrooms, ginseng, berries, plums, choke cherries, wild grapes, herbs for medicinal and craft purposes and cutting small trees for building "sweat lodges" for spiritual sweat lodge ceremonies. SMSC is concerned that the dust and fumes generated by the project will adversely affect these natural resources on the SMSC Reservation. V. Impact on Land. A. Potential for soil contamination. For the same reasons as those set forth in Section III. B above in the discussion of potential adverse impacts on water, SMSC is concerned about the potential for soil contamination. B. Adequacy of erosion control. The site contains steep slopes and erodible soils. Are the erosion and sedimentation measures to be employed during the project adequate? The response to Question No. 17 indicates that the acreage to be excavated is 40 acres. However, the grade break between existing and proposed contour lines on Map B City of Shakopee May 29, 1991 Page 11 show as much as 30 feet between existing and proposed elevations. This seems to indicate that the area to be excavated extends into the city limits of Prior Lake. C. Reclamation plan. EAW Guidelines indicate that the project description called for by Question No. 6 should focus on aspects of the project that may directly or indirectly manipulate, alter or impact the physical environment, including project closure actions. The reclamation plan that is attached is very general. Are post project erosion and sedimentation measures adequate? Will the reclaimed site support wildlife to its current extent? The reclamation plan should include either the sealing of the water well or an appropriate maintenance plan so that it does not become an access point for water contamination. What guarantees will be required to insure that reclamation will be timely and adequately accomplished and maintained? Financial guarantees should be posted by the fee owner of the land. D. Future expansion of project; Future use of site. Even though the applicant does not presently intend to mine more than 40 acres, SMSC is concerned that this intention may change and the project will be expanded in the future. Even though the response to Question No. 30 says that the applicant's brother will not obtain any rights to expand his operation as a result of this project, SMSC is also concerned that such operation will also want to expand. Owners of former gravel pits are often approached with proposals for siting cement plants, asphalt plants, recycling plants, etc. on old gravel pit lands. Even though any such expansions or new noxious uses would also require environmental review, once the City has permitted gravel mining to the extent of the currently proposed project, the environmental resources to be jeopardized by new projects will be far fewer than they are today. SMSC is concerned that this project will affect land use patterns and be the beginning of the continuing deterioration of the area's environment. VI. Impact on Man—made or Natural Features of Historic, Geologic, or Aesthetic Significance. A. Topography. As indicated in the response to Question No. 6, the site contains many steep hills and variations in elevations. This City of Shakopee May 29, 1991 Page 12 interesting topography is uncommon in the metropolitan area, is characteristic of areas near the river and is aesthetically pleasing. The hills can be seen in the distance from the surrounding properties. This aspect of the site will be totally and irreversibly destroyed by this project, leaving a site with a maximum grade of 18%. B. General character of site and surrounding area. Question No. 9 calls for a discussion of any conflicts with nearby land use that involve environmental matters. EAW Guidelines (page 24) note that gravel mining is a nuisance to nearby residents and state that a complete discussion of surrounding land use should be given in the EAW. However, the EAW does not evidence a full appreciation of the current character of this area, which is a feature of aesthetic significance in and of itself. Residents of the SMSC Reservation now enjoy a tranquil agrarian/rural environment with birds, wildlife, woodlands, rolling hills and pleasing views. This project will convert that environment to one of noise, dust, fumes, truck traffic, heavy equipment, temporary shacks, gravel stock piles, stagnant sedimentation ponds and a denuded flat landscape. C SMSC Reservation. The SMSC Reservation itself is a feature of historic and cultural significance. The land was dedicated by the United States Government to the Mdewakanton Sioux Tribe in 1889. This reservation is one of only four Sioux Indian reservations in the State of Minnesota. One hundred ten Sioux Indians currently make their home on this land. Activities are carried on in an attempt to preserve the culture of the Sioux Indian tribe, which once occupied all of the Minnesota River Valley. Many traditional Sioux Indian practices involve use of natural resources and the outdoor environment. As mentioned above, the land is used by residents for hunting, trapping, gathering and spiritual ceremonies. The EAW does not adequately address this project's effect upon such significant cultural and historical features of the neighboring lands even though the United States Supreme Court has given special recognition to the importance of protecting such features when they appertain to a federally recognized Indian tribe. City of Shakopee May 29, 1991 Page 13 OTHER INADEQUACIES OF EAW In addition to the above—mentioned inadequacies, the response to Question No. 8 fails to mention the need for Metropolitan Council review. Under Chapter 5800 of the Minnesota Rules, a project is considered to have metropolitan significance and require review by the Metropolitan Council if it has a substantial physical effect on a local governmental unit other than the local unit in which the project is to be located. There is certainly a substantial physical effect on the SMSC Reservation. Given that the project abuts on Prior Lake land, that the applicant proposes to route the project's truck traffic through Prior Lake and that the grade breaks between existing and proposed contour lines on Map B seem to indicate grading into the city limits of Prior Lake, there is also a substantial physical effect on Prior Lake. The response to Question No. 8 mentions only a driveway permit and a grading permit (for the south mining access road) from the City of Prior Lake. As stated in the response to Question 30.a, if there were any grading or excavation in Prior Lake, a permit would be required from Prior Lake. As mentioned above, Map B seems to indicate grading in Prior Lake. The routing of traffic through Prior Lake may also require a permit from Prior Lake. The EAW fails to discuss reasonable alternatives which would avoid this project's potential significant environmental impacts. On two occasions, SMSC has requested the applicant to come to SMSC with a proposal acceptable to the applicant whereby this project would be abandoned. The applicant has not yet responded. CONCLUSION This project has a potential for significant environmental effects on ambient noise, air, water, flora, fauna, land and features of historic, geologic and aesthetic significance. The effects will be extensive; they will be present every day during the 8 to 12 year (or longer) project life; and, some will be irreversible, even after reclamation. If this project proceeds, other noxious projects can be anticipated, creating the potential for even greater cumulative effects. The EAW fails to discuss the comparative environmental impact of reasonable alternatives. Because the EAW lacks reasonably available information about certain potential environmental effects and fails to even mention others, it is not sufficient as the basis for a reasoned decision about the potential for, or significance of, the environmental impacts of City of Shakopee May 29, 1991 Page 14 this project. An EIS must be required in order to adequately address the potential environmental effects of this project. Respectfully submitted, SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX CO By U., _ gc)---,3 j ,� Allene Ross, Vice-Chair 49? Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-3898 Pl 140/CP" Telephone (612) 296-6300i MINNESOTA 1990 r h May 30, 1991v� CIA,p o`�'� 9 S Lindberg S. Eskola N, :t-;, City of Shakopee �A r_ 129 1st Avenue East Shakopee, Minnesota 55739 Dear Mr. Eskola: Re: McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine Environmental Assessment Worksheet Thank you for the opportunity to review the McKenna Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff has reviewed the document and has the following comments. We note the intention (item 6) to determine what permits, if any, will be required by the MPCA in the course of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) process. Since the possible applicability of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System (NPDES/SDS) and storm water permits is not addressed in the EAW, we request that the operator contact Douglas Hall of the MPCA Division of Water Quality (297-1832) to discuss them. Also, if he has not already done so, the operator should contact Innocent Eyoh of the MPCA Division of Air Quality (296-7739) to confirm the statement in the EAW that an Indirect Source Permit is not required. Further discussion of the contents of this letter should be addressed to William J. Lynott of my staff at 296-7794. Thank you again for sending us this material. Sincerely, gi-d-e? 7-;/ /4/1 , Paul Hoff, Director Environmental Analysis Office Environmental Support Division PH:pnk cc: Innocent Eyoh, MPCA Doug Hall, MPCA Regional Offices: Duluth • Brainerd • Detroit Lakes • Marshall • Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on Recycled Paper (Qc4 EAW Process RGU determines EAW is necessary ' t RGU prepares EAW :: I varies Grey barsrdnsc a (prsupplies necessary tiara) I period a erre r,atria, y an,dim may oma. RGU approves EAW for distribution 1 to 5 working days RGU sends EAW to distribution list • 1 to 5 working days RGU issues press release 7 to 21 calendar days I Notice published inB�Monitor Jk • rri�. 26tri�� i 7 to 21 days after receipt of EAW 30 day comment period 30 calendar days (starts at EQB Monitor publication date) •30 day airnment period ends • 4,1,4_,{ act , I 3 waking days to 30 days* RGU decides if Eneeds and responds to comments s 1 to 5 waridng days J J NG 2-(ti i RGU distributes notice of decision I 7 to 21 calendar days 111111 I Notice published in ESB Monitor I 5 7 to 21 days after receipt of decision *can vary ming on RGU d ,Cr( (3UAA: _ r'ZP(VC7 j() Z , ( e.)t 5CI- t7ULE n Pt:An A;;4G COMMS tss 1/ Pg173 3 L-f" I i ACC-),-).5T pc,'ULiSr(//VG DA-T 7). tifa/P/t c7p UG -5 (3( cGg lod INFORMATION/ANALYSES ABSENT FROM EAW "Proposed Truck Traffic Volumes and Necessary Roadway Improvements" cited in Staff Report dated June 14, 1991 A. (We assume this includes truck routing issues.) B. (We assume this includes analysis of basis for trip generation figure.) C. (We assume this includes related issue of impact on air due to traffic.) D. Meeting: Friday (6/21/91) of engineers of County and Cities of Shakopee and Prior Lake with the Prior Lake Planner. SMSC has asked to be invited. II. "Location of Phases II and III for Machinery and Stockpiles" cited in Staff Report dated June 14, 1991 III. "Stormwater Drainage Provisions" cited in Staff Report dated June 14, 1991 A. Engineering issues regarding the ponds and basins (Met Council) B. Adequacy of site sedimentation pond (SMSC-p.9) C. Contaminants in storm water discharge and impact of EPA NPDES regs IV. Analysis of whether farmstead meets criteria of National Register of Historical Places (Minnesota Historical Society) V. Complete landscaping plan showing design and quality of berm plantings by a registered landscape architect (PL; SMSC) VI. Complete Maps A. Information in II. above B. Interior site traffic pattern including circular drives (PL; SMSC) C. Accurate distance scales (SMSC) D. Clear and complete information about well locations (and depths) on project site and on adjacent properties (SMSC-p.7) E. Location of recycle pond in all phases (SMSC-p.8) VII. Information regarding erosion control measures A. Description of site conditions during non-operating season as they pertain to erosion prevention (DNR) B. Adequacy of erosion and sedimentation measures (SMSC-p10) C. Error in information in existing and proposed contour lines? (SMSC- p.10) 1 VIII. Additional information regarding reclamation plan A. Is on site top soil adequate? (DNR) B. Physical treatments to alleviate compaction of pit floor (DNR) C. Propriety of crop selection in first year of reclamation (DNR) D. Adequacy of 15-acre threshold for sequential reclamation (DNR) E. Disposition of berms during reclamation phase (DNR) F. Sealing of wells (SMSC-p.8) G. Analysis of wildlife habitat (SMSC-p10) H. Adequacy of erosion and sedimentation measures (SMSC-p11) I. Financial guarantees (SMSC-p11; PL) IX. Information regarding basis for dBA generated by the project (SMSC-p.3) X. Information about type and source of fuel for machinery and substances used for machinery maintenance, (SMSC-p.8) M. More information about recycle pond A. Adequacy of recyle pond's maximum size fo handle waste stream from aggregate washing (SMSC-p.8) B. Engineering issues regarding the ponds and basins (Met Council) C. Location of recycle pond in each phase (SMSC-p.8) D. Volume and chemical composition of silt (SMSC-p.8) XII. Quantitative analysis of impact on ground water levels and (e.g. volume; rate of pumping; direction of ground water flow) and effect on SMSC wells (SMSC- p•?) XIII. Qualitative analysis of impact on ground water A. Information regarding direction of ground water flow (SMSC-p.9) B. Information regarding of effect of removing gravel filter (SMSC-p.9) XIV. Analysis of effect on exisiting flora and fauna on site and in area (SMSC-p.10) A. Significance of rumored on site stream XV. Inquiry of SMSC regarding use of SMSC land; inquiry into other adjacent land use 2 A. SMSC long term land use planning. B.SMSC projected population growth. C. Current activites on SMSC land. D. Compatibility of project with surrounding land use in general. XVI. Analysis of effect on SMSC as a "feature of historic significance." XVII. Analysis of feasible and prudent alternatives. The Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (116D.04, Subd 6) requires the RGU to analyze alternatives to the project whenever it believes the granting of a permit will significantly affect the quality of the environment or be likely to cause pollution, impairment or destruction of the air, water, land or other natural resources. XVIII. Complete listing of permits A. Prior Lake/Spring Lake Watershed District (PL/SL WD) B. Met Council Review (SMSC) C. Analysis of whether MPCA standards regarding fugitive particulate matter will be met (SMSC-p. 6) D. Need for stationary source air emission facility permit (SMSC-p.6) E. NPDES permit (SMSC-p.9) F. Prior Lake permits? G. Others? 3 �lr-.r�,,�P ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR THE PROPOSED McKENNA SAND AND GRAVEL MINE SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Responsible Governmental Unit: City of Shakopee 129 First Avenue East Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445-3650 April, 1991 ABSTRACT for the McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine EAW Shakopee, Minnesota April 5, 1991 The applicant is proposing to operate a gravel mine on the 80 acre site in three phases. The mine is proposed to operate for eight to twelve years, producing 1, 000 , 000 cubic yards of aggregate. The land will be reclaimed for crop production. Envfronmentai Assessment Worksheet (EAW) - NOTE TO PREPARERS This worksheet is to be completed by the Responsible Governmental Unit(RGU) or its agents. The project proposer must supply any reasonably accessible data necessary for the worksheet,but is not to complete the final worksheet itself. If a complete answer does not fit in the space allotted, attach additional sheets as necessary. For assistance with this worksheet contact the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) at(612)296-8233 or(toil-free) 1-800-652-9747(ask operator for the EQB environmental review program)or consult"EAW Guidelines,"a booklet available from the EQB. - NOTE TO REVIEWERS Comments must be submitted to the RGU (see item 3) during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. (Contact the RGU or the EQB to learn when the comment period ends.) Comments should address the accuracy and — completeness of the information,potential impacts that may warrant further investigation, and the need for an EIS. If the EAW has been prepared for the scoping of an EIS (see item 4),comments should address the accuracy and completeness of the information and suggest issues for investigation in the EIS. - 1. ProjectTitle McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine 2. Proposer McKenna Sand & Gravel Co. 3. RGU City of Shakopee, MN Contact person David McKenna Contact person Lindberg S . Ekola Address 8221 Horizon Drive and title 129 First Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55379 Address Shakopee, MN 55379 Phone ( 612 ) 496-1067 ( 612 ) 445-3650 Phone 4. Reason for EAW Preparation 0 EIS scoping C51 mandatory LAW 0 citizen petition 0 RGU disceaon 0 Proposer volunteered If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category numbers) 4 410. 4 3 0 0 , subp. 12 5. Project Location W X14 NE 1/4 Section 22 Township 115 Range 22 County Scott City/Twp Shakotee Attach copies of each of the following to the EAW: See Attached a. a county map showing the general location of the project; b. copy(ies)of USGS 7.5 minute,1:24,000 scale map (photocopy is OK) indicating the project boundaries; See Attached C. a site plan showing all significant project and natural features. See attached ..d.an existing land use and zoning map of immediate area. See Attached 6. Descnpuon Give a complete cescription of the proposed project and ancillary facilities (attach additional sheets as necessary). Emphasize construction and operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or produce wastes. Indicate the timing and duration of construction activities. Please see attached. Provide a 50 or fewer word abstract for use in EQB Monitor notice: 7. Project Magnitude Data Total Project Area (acres) 80 or Length (miles) Not Applicable (NA) Number of Residential Units Unattached NA Attached NA Commercial / Industrial / Institutional Building Area (gross floor space) Total NA square feet; Indicate area of specific uses: Office NA Manufacturing NA Retail NA Other Industrial Sand and Gravel Mining Warehouse NA Institutional NA — Light Industrial NA Agricultural NA Other Commercial (specify) NA Building Height(s) NA 8. Permits and Approvals Required List all known local, state, and federal permits, approvals,and funding required: Unit of Government Type of Application Status Please see attached. 9. Land Use Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands. Discuss the compatibility of the project with adjacent and nearby land uses;indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify any potential environmental hazard due to past land »mss, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks. Please see attached. 10. Cover Types Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development (before and after totals should be equal): Before After Before After Types 2 to 8 Wetlands 0 0 Urban/Suburban Lawn 0 0 Wooded/Forest 6.7 2. 1 Landscaping Brush/Grassland/Pasture land 27.6 0 Impervious Surface (Roads) .4 2.0 Cropland 45.3 75.9 Other(describe) 0 0 Total 80.0 AC 80.0 AC 11. Fish,Wildlife,and Ecologically Sensitive Resources a. Describe fish and wildlife resources on or near the site and discuss how they would be affected by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. Please see attached b. Are there any state-listed endangered,threatened,or special-concern species;rare plant communities;colonial waterbird _ nesting colonies;native prairie or other rare habitat;or other sensitive ecological resources on or near the site? t] Yes 0 No If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the resources was conducted. Describe measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. Please see attached 2 — 12. Physical Impacts on Water Resources Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration (dredging, tilling,stream diversion, outfall structure,diking,impoundment) of arty surface water(lake,pond,wetland,stream,drainage ditch)? Yes r No If yes, identify the water resource to be affected and describe: the alteration,including the construction process;volumes of dredged or fill material;area affected; length of stream diversion;water surface area affected;timing and extent of fluctuations in water surface elevations; spoils disposal sites;and proposed mitigation measures to minimize impacts. Please see the attached Drainage Report. Stormwater and aggregate wash water will be the two water resources - affected by the mining operation. Refer to Question 19 for treatment methods . - 13. Water Use a. Will the project involve the installation or abandonment of any wells? 0 Yes :�fi No For abandoned wells give the location and Unique well number. For new wells, or other previously unpermitted wells, give the location and purpose of the well and the Unique well number(if known). - b. Will the project require an appropriation of ground or surface water(including dewatering)? Yes C No If yes, indicate the source,quantity,duration, purpose of the appropriation,and DNR water appropriation permit number of arty existing appropriation. Discuss the impact of the appropriation on ground water levels. Please see attached - C. Will the project require connection to a public water supply? 0 Yes 2 No If yes,identify the supply, the DNR water appropriation permit number of the supply,and the quantity to be used. Water to be used for mining operations will be ground water supplied by - the existing farm well. 14. Water-related Land Use Management Districts Does any part of the project site involve a shoreland zoning district,a delineated 100-year flood plain,or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river land use district? 0 Yes E. No - If yes,identify the district and discuss the compatibility of the project with the land use restrictions of the district. 15. Water Surface Use Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body? 0 Yes No If yes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts with other users or fish and wildlife resources. 16. Soils Approximate depth (in feet) to: - Ground water: minimum 10 0 average 12 5 Bedrock: minimum 9 6 average – 15 0 Describe the soils on the site,giving SCS classifications,if known.(SCS interpretations and soil boring logs need not be attached.) Please see attached. - 17. Erosion and Sedimentation Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to be moved: acres 40 ; cubic yards 1 . 00Q., 000 . Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map. - Describe the erosion and sedimentation measures to be used during and after construction of the project. Please see attached. 3 18. Water Quality.Surface Water Runoff a. Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project. Describe methods to be used to manage and/or treat runoff. Please see attached. b. Identify the route(s) and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site. Estimate the impact of the runoff on the quality of the receiving waters. (If the runoff may affect a lake consult "EAW Guidelines" about whether a nutrient budget analysis is needed.) Please see attached. 19. Water Quality.Wastewaters. a. Describe sources, quantities,and composition(except for normal domestic sewage) of all sanitary and industrial wastewaters produced or treated at the site. Please see attached. b. Describe any waste treatment methods to be used and give estimates of composition after treatment,or if the project involves on-site sewage systems,discuss the suitability of the site conditions for such systems. Identify receiving waters (including ground water) and estimate the impact of the discharge on the quality of the receiving waters. (If the discharge may affect a lake consult "EAW Guidelines"about whether a nutrient budget analysis is nr.'"i.) Please see attached. C. If wastes will be discharged into a sewer system or pretreatment system,identify the system and discuss the ability of the system to accept the volume and composition of the wastes. Identify any improvements which will be necessary. Not applicable. 20. Ground Water—Potential for Contamination a. Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water. 100 ' minimum; 125 'average. b. Describe any of the following site hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site map:sinkholes;shallow limestone formations/karst conditions; soils with high infiltration rates;abandoned or unused wells. Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards. Please see attached. C. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present on the project site and identify measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating ground water. The applicant is proposing to use chemicals to control dust on the mining access road. The applicant will be required to use EPA and MPCA approved chemicals such as calcium chloride only. 21. Solid Wastes; Hazardous Wastes; Storage Tanks a. Describe the types,amounts, and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes to be generated,including animal manures, sludges and ashes. Identify the method and location of disposal. For projects generating municipal solid waste indicate if there will be a source separation plan;list type(s) and how the project will be modified to allow recycling. There will be no solid or hazardous wastes generated by the mining operation. b. Indicate the number,location,size, and use of any above or below ground tanks to be used for storage of petroleum products or other materials (except water). Prohibiting on-site storage of fuel is one of the recommended conditions listed in the conditional use permit report. The applicant is agreeing to this condition. 4 22. Traffic Parking spaces added 2 0 Existing spaces (if project involves expansion) NA Estimated total Average Daily Traffic(ADT) generated 77 Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated (if known)and its timing:200 trucks 7am-7pm. For each affected road indicate the ADT and the directional distribution of traffic with and without the project. Provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on the affected roads and describe arty traffic improvements which will -- be necessary. Please see attached. 23. Vehicle-related air emissions Provide an estimate of the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality,including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. (If the project involves 500 or more parking spaces,consult "EAW Guidelines"about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed.) The project will not cause any significant decrease in air quality based on the discussion in Question 22. 24. Stationary source air emissions Will the project involve any stationary sources of air emissions(such as boilers or exhaust stacks)? 0 Yes 0 No If yes,describe the sources,quantities,and composition of the emissions;the proposed air pollution control devices;the quantities and composition of the emissions after treatment;and the effects on air quality. Facilities for producing asphalt and/or concrete are not being proposed by the applicant. A PCA Indirect Source Permit will not be required for this proposal as regulated by Section 7001 of the Minnesota Rules 1989 edition. 25. Will the project generate dust,odors, or noise during construction and/or operation? ® Yes 0 No If yes,describe the sources,characteristics, duration,and quantities or intensity,and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Also identify the locations of sensitive receptors in the vicinity and estimate the impacts on these receptors. Please see attached. 26. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site: a. archeological,historical,or architectural resources? 0 Yes ® No b. prime or unique farmlands? 0 Yes El No C. designated parks,recreation areas,or trails? 0 Yes 1E3 No d. scenic views and vistas? 0 Yes ® No e. other unique resources? 0 Yes Di No If any items are answered Yes,describe the resource and identify any impacts on the resource due to the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. The database research for the site has been requested by the applicant from the National Heritage Program and the Minnesota Historical Society. 27. Will the project create adverse visual impacts? (Examples include:glare from intense lights;lights visible in wilderness areas;and large visible plumes from cooling towers or exhaust stacks.) 0 Yes gl No If yes,explain. The applicant is phasing the operation of the mine so as to minimize impacts, including visual concerns from adjacent properties . — 28. Compatibility with plans Is the project subject to an adopted local comprehensive land use plan or any other applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of an local,regional,state,or federal agency? 0 Yes 0 No If yes, identify the applicable plan(s),discuss the compatibility of the project with the provisions of the plan(s),and explain how arty conflicts between the project and the plan(s) will be resolved. If no,explain. Please see attached. 5 29. Impact on Infrastructure and Public Services Will new or expanded utilities, roads, other infrastructure,or public services be required to serve the project? (XYes ❑ No If yes, describe the new or additional infrastructure /services needed. (Amy infrastructure that is a "connected action" with respect to the project must be assessed in this EAW;see "LAW Guidelines"for details.) The additional road improvements were discussed in Question 22 . 30. Related Developments; Cumulative Impact a. Are future stages of this development planned or likely? 2 Yes 5 No If yes,briefly describe future stages,their timing,and plans for environmental review. b. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? 0 Yes CZ No If yes,briefly describe the past development,its timing,and any past environmental review. — C. Is other development anticipated on adjacent lands or outlots? 0 Yes M No If yes, briefly describe the development and its relationship to the present project. d. If a,b,or c were marked Yes, discuss any cumulative environmental impacts resulting from this project and the other development. Please see attached. 31. Other Potential Environmental Impacts If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts which were not addressed by items 1 to 28,identify and discuss them here,along with any proposed mitigation. No additional comments . 32. SUMMARY OF ISSUES (This section need not be completed if the LAW is being done for EIS scoping;instead,address relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document which must accompany the EAW.) List any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is commenced. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues, including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. Please see attached. CERTIFiCATIONS BY THE RGU (all 3 certifications must be signed for EOB acceptance of the EAW for publication of notice in the EQB Monitor) A. I hereby certify that the i fo ti n contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. Signature ArP ,t,1,a , , . B. I hereby certify that the project described in this EAW is the complete project and there are no other projects,project stages, or project components,other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as "connected actions"or "phased actio,s," as deP,�: edively,at Minn.Rules,pts.4410.0200, subp.9b and subp.60. Signature Kf��,�� C. I hereby certify that copies of the cgmpleted EAW are being sent to all points on the offidal EQB EAW distribution list. Signature ,C.&.1,A,u„ _s7fn / / Title of signer e r+y A)t4 (u r s f rq o}^ Date 4//7` T/ 6 // ` Er.,... -c:ai Quality Board. Rev.sed June 199Q. McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine (EAW) Page - 7 Shakopee, Minnesota April 5, 1991 6. Description The applicant is proposing to operate a sand and gravel mine on the described property. The mining operations will occur on the south 40 acres of the 80 acre site in three phases. The mine is proposed to operate for eight to twelve years, -- producing 1, 000, 000 cubic yards of aggregate. The applicant is proposing to operate the mine between 7: 00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. as allowed by the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance. Current use of the site is pasture land. It is hilly with steep grades generally unsuitable for crops. The maximum depth to be mined is 55 feet (vertical) where the largest hill would be removed. With the completion of each phase the land will be regraded and reclaimed to allow for crop production. The north 40 acres will continue to be used for cropland. No mining activities will occur on the north 40 acres. Please refer to the site plans provided for question 5 for further information on the boundaries, depths, buffer areas, location of mining equipment, sediment ponds and other features of the mine. The applicant's brother has removed some aggregate from the 30 acre parcel south of the proposed mine. This property is located in the City of Prior Lake. The mining and reclamation on this property is being regulated by the City of Prior Lake. Information on this operation has been included with this EAW as appropriate. 8. Permits and Approvals Required Unit of Government Type of Application Status City of Shakopee m Conditional Use Permit Pending and the Mineral Extraction Completion and Land Rehabilitation of EAW Permit m Work in Public Right-of- Not way (for driveway) Submitted m Building Permits Not (for mining buildings) Submitted City of Prior Lake m Driveway Permit (for Not driveway on McKenna Rd. ) Submitted m Grading Permit (for Not south mining access road. ) Submitted Department of m Water Appropriation Permit Not Natural Resources Submitted McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine (EAW) Page - 8 Shakopee, Minnesota April 5, 1991 Pollution Control N PCA permits will be Not -- Agency determined in the EAW Submitted Review Process 9 . Land Use The past land uses of the south 40 acres has been pasture land and cropland on the north 40 acres. The property has been in agricultural uses for several decades. There should not be any environmental hazards due to the past land uses on the proposed site. As shown on the attached Land Use and Zoning Map (Question 5) the adjacent land uses are low density residential and agricultural . There are approximately 35 residences located to the west on the 160 acre Shakopee Mdewanton Sioux Indian Reservation. The distance from the aggregate processing area to the nearest residence other than the farmstead on the site is approximately 1, 000 feet. Please refer to the site plans provided in Question 5. Measures proposed by the applicant to improve the land use compatibility of the mine and adjacent land uses include the phasing of mining and reclamation operations, locating the processing area in a protected interior area which has a lower elevation, use of berms along the west property line, and planting trees on the berm to help shield noise, dust and pollution. The routing of truck traffic on the south mining access road to County Road 42 also is proposed to minimize traffic impacts on the adjacent residences to the west. 11. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources a. There are no fish resources on or near the site. The wildlife resources on the site are limited by past agricultural uses of the property. Some upland game habitat exists on the south 40 acres but is limited by the grazing of animals. The operation of the mine and the reclamation in phases will help minimize the impact on the wildlife resources. The berm and landscaping along the west property line will provide some habitat opportunities. b. A site survey of the plant and animal resources has not been taken. The impacts of agricultural activities (crop production and grazing) have altered the native plant species on the property over the past several decades. The database research by the National Heritage Program (DNR) for the site has not identified any significant stands of endangered or McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine (EAW) Page - 9 Shakopee, Minnesota April 5, 1991 threatened plant or animal species. Attached is a letter from Bonita Eliason the Endangered Resource/Environmental Review Specialist stating the results of the database research. 13 . Water Use b. The applicant is proposing to use the existing well on the farm located in the farmstead area. The well depth is 240 feet and has a 9" casing. The exact volume of water is not known at this time. Ground water is proposed to be used to control dust on the site and washing of aggregate. The applicant prefers to utilize chemical methods to control dust over the use of water. If washing of the aggregate is necessary the applicant expects to exceed the one million gallons per year quantity and will obtain a permit from the DNR. 16. Soils HaB2 Hayden loam, 2-6 percent slopes, moderately eroded. HaC Hayden Loam, 6-12 percent slopes. HaC2 Hayden loam, 6-12 percent slopes, moderately eroded. HbE2 Hayden sandy loam, 18-25 percent slopes, moderately eroded. HeB Hubbard loamy fine sand, 2-6 percent slopes. TcB Terril silt loam, 2-6- percent slopes. TcC Terril silt loam, 6-12 percent slopes. DbB Dakota sandy loam, 2-6 percent slopes. Sb Steep land Hayden Lester materials. 17 . Erosion and Sedimentation As shown on the attached topography map and soil map, there are several areas on the proposed site with steep slopes. The soil classifications Sb and HbE2 are the primary areas subject to erosion on the existing site. Attached to the Drainage Report is a description of the erosion and sedimentation measures as proposed by the applicant. Detailed drawings of the sedimentation pond, the waste water pond and the silt fence are also included with the Drainage Report. 18. Water Quality - Surface Water Runoff a. Stormwater Quality and Quantity and Treatment Methods. The steep slopes and use of the land for pasture have affected the surface water quality and quantity draining from the site in the past. The impacts from the agricultural land use has McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine (EAW) Page -10 Shakopee, Minnesota April 5, 1991 added to the non-point pollution of surface water similar to the adjacent agricultural properties. The applicant has submitted the attached Drainage Report to address surface water quality and quantity aspects. The surface water impacts of this project have been reviewed by the City Engineer. With the conditions recommended in the conditional use permit process and the applicable ordinance requirements the impacts on stormwater will be addressed. The proposed operation will meet the standards established in the Blue Lake Watershed Stormwater Management Plan. To manage stormwater on the site the applicant is proposing to build a sedimentation pond on the west side. A separate pond will also be constructed to treat the aggregate wash water. The dimensions and areas of the ponds are given in the Drainage Report. Please refer to the Drainage Report and the Map B - Proposed Operations for more information on stormwater facilities. b. Stormwater Drainage The stormwater from the sedimentation pond flows across applicant' s parcel to the north and then east to the neighboring farm. Eventually the stormwater drains into Dean' s Lake after crossing several agricultural properties. Dean ' s Lake is approximately one mile north of the applicant ' s site. The volume of discharge from the site will be 1/3 _ c. f. s. per acre. Since sediment, nutrient and volume control measures are being implemented the impact of the mining operation on the quality of receiving water (Dean ' s Lake) should be negligible. 19 . Water Quality - Wastewaters a. Sources and Quantities The applicant has proposed to construct a wastewater recycle pond to store water used in the washing of aggregate. The source of the water for aggregate washing is the existing well on the site. The Drainage Report provides detailed design information on the pond. The amount of aggregate to be washed has not been determined at this time. The amount will depend on the requirements of the buyers of the aggregate. The applicant expects more than one buyer of the aggregate over the next 8 to 12 years. He does not anticipate washing more than 50 percent of the aggregate. The maximum wastewater recycle pond size is 100 feet by 100 feet at a depth of three McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine (EAW) Page -11 Shakopee, Minnesota April 5, 1991 feet. The size of the pond will depend on estimated need. Please refer to the Drainage Report for pond design details. b. Treatment The intent of constructing the wastewater pond is to store and recycle water for washing aggregate. No wash water will be discharged overland. Silt from the pond will be pumped on a regular basis and will be placed on the site under the topsoil in the reclamation process. c. Sanitary Sewer The applicant is proposing to use satellite toilet facilities on the site. A maximum of 20 employees will be working on the site. The City of Shakopee Building Official through the administration of the Plumbing Code will regulate these facilities. 20 . Ground Water - Potential for Contamination b. There are no special geologic or land form features which would be of concern to ground water contamination. Attached to the Drainage Report is information on area wells. The lowest elevation of gravel extraction will be approximately 830 feet. The water table is located approximately at 730 feet or 100 feet below the lowest excavation level . The on-site well is 240 feet deep and located at the 840 foot contour elevation. 22 . Traffic The applicant is proposing to mine 1, 000 , 000 cubic yards in 8 to 12 years. Assuming a 10 year operation time frame 10, 000 truck loads would be generated each year (1, 000, 000 yards T 10 yards per truck T 10 years) . The applicant estimates there are approximately 200 days in a year that the mine could operate. The truck traffic in a given year would fluctuate depending on the road construction season. The applicant estimates the maximum ADT would be 200 trucks in the peak construction season. The estimated total ADT would be 28 trucks (10, 000 annual truckloads T 365 days each year = 28) . Trips generated by the mining operation would be 56 trips per day (28 trucks x 2 = 56 trips) . This assumes all trucks start their trips from the site and return that day. Attached is a copy of an area traffic volume map for 1990 and 2010 . The traffic volume on County Road 42 in 1990 was 6600 McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine (EAW) Page -12 Shakopee, Minnesota April 5, 1991 and the projected 2010 traffic volume is 17160 ADT. The 1990 numbers reflect actual counts whereas the 2010 volumes represent the projected volumes. The applicant is proposing to route all truck traffic to the south. Trucks would gain access on McKenna Road via the south mining access road and travel to County Road 42 . The proposed truck traffic would then go west or east on County Road 42 depending on the destination. The applicant is anticipating destinations to be south of the site. Road improvements include upgrading McKenna Road to County Road 42 from the south mining access road to a standard established by the Prior Lake City Engineer. A maintenance program for those sections of McKenna Road used by the operator must also be approved by the Prior Lake City Engineer. County Road 42 will be improved to requirements established by the County Engineer. Suggested at this time is a right turn lane for the west bound lane and a passing lane for eastbound traffic on County Road 42 . All road improvements must be constructed prior to the operation of the mine. With the proposed improvements and relatively low traffic volume generated by the mine in relation to existing traffic on County Road 42 traffic congestion should be minimal as - result of the operations. 25 . Air Pollution, Dust, Noise Construction equipment and trucks will generate exhaust fumes, dust, and noise during mining operations. Based on the proposed traffic volumes the air pollution impacts from exhaust fumes should not be significant. Typical mining equipment will generate 88 dBA measured 50 feet from the source. Only equipment properly muffled in accordance with applicable regulation will be allowed on the site. Trees, berms, and ground cover will also be used to minimize the potential air pollution, dust, and noise and to assist in _ shielding the operations from public view. Regular maintenance of the mining access road and driveways will be required. Circular truck routes within the site to reduce the backing-up of haul trucks will minimize the noise from back-up bells or buzzers. Water and/or approved chemicals will be spread on all non-paved driving surfaces during mining operations on the site and on all driveways to public roads. The applicant is locating the gravel processing equipment and stock piles of aggregate in an area interior to the site. This area is lower in elevation and it is protected by the McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine (EAW) Page -13 Shakopee, Minnesota April 5, 1991 surrounding hills. Pollution, dust and noise will be limited by the siting of processing equipment. The phasing of extraction operations and reclamation has been designed to also minimize impacts on adjacent properties. Phase One is on the east side of the site away from the majority of the residences to the west. Reclamation will also occur in phases and must be completed within one year after mining operations are ceased. This time frame is an ordinance requirement. _ Dust, noise and air pollution will be regulated by the City ordinance and conditions established in the conditional use permit process. The City Council has authority to revoke the conditional use permit if the ordinances and conditions are not complied with. The applicant will have to be aware and comply with state air quality and noise regulations. 28. Compatibility with Plans The current Comprehensive Plan for the City of Shakopee was adopted in 1981. As a policy document the Comprehensive Plan guides the overall physical development of the community. The plan designates the site as agricultural in terms of land use but does not provide specific direction on mineral extraction operations. The plan does establish as a general policy the preservation of agricultural operations on land defined as good farmland. The 40 acre mining site is identified in the _ 1981 plan as a site poor for farming and development because of the steep and rolling terrain. Upon completion of the mining and reclamation activities the applicant is proposing to use the site for crop production. The resulting slopes after reclamation will be less steep (maximum grade allowed by ordinance is 18%) to allow for a variety of crops to be grown. The proposed agricultural land use complies with the Comprehensive Plan. The Blue Lake Watershed Stormwater Management Plan (discussed in Question 18) was recently adopted by the Shakopee City Council . The proposed mining operation with recommended conditions will comply with the standards established in this plan. 30 . Related Developments; Cumulative Impacts a. The applicant ' s brother owns the 30 acre parcel to the south of the site and has removed some aggregate resources from his land. This property is located in the City of Prior Lake and the removal of aggregate was authorized by a grading permit. No development rights would be granted to the brother' s property with approval of the applicant' s conditional use McKenna Sand and Gravel Mine (EAW) Page -14 Shakopee, Minnesota April 5, 1991 permit since that property is in the City of Prior Lake. Any grading or excavation in Prior Lake would require that municipality' s approval. The applicant is not seeking approval for future operations in Prior Lake with this submittal . Since the authority to approve any mining operation on the adjacent 30 acre parcel rests with the City of Prior Lake and the applicant ' s brother is not requesting a conditional use permit at this time the phased action status should not apply to this project. A separate EAW should be prepared if the applicant' s brother proposes to operate a gravel mining operation on his 30 acre parcel . If the 30 acres were proposed to be mined the cumulative efforts of both mines should be considered in a second EAW. The proposer would be responsible for providing information to the appropriate municipality (RGU) in that environmental review. 32 . Summary of Issues The impacts on adjacent properties is a primary concern. The impacts result from increased truck traffic; mining operations creating additional dust, noise and air pollution; possible soil erosion and stormwater quality degradation; use of groundwater and the possible effects on groundwater quality. The applicant has proposed numerous mitigation efforts to minimize impacts on adjacent properties. Some of these efforts include the rerouting of trucks to the south, the phasing of mining operations, locating mining equipment in a protected area, use of berms and landscaping, and the construction of sediment ponds to control water quantity and quality. The conditional use permit/mineral extraction and land rehabilitation permit process requires the renewal of permits every three years. A public hearing is held by the Planning Commission to provide an in depth review of the conditions and ordinances applicable to the operation in the renewal process. The public hearing provides the opportunity for community input on the mine operation as well. If compliance with the conditions and ordinances is not met, the City Council has the authority to revoke a conditional use permit. An annual review is also held by the Planning Commission on all mining operations. The annual review provides for the periodic monitoring of the mining operations. Mc.KE/JAIA\ sikap0.44, Gtz.AvE... .L. F Otic.svo&J 5 - AAP 1 - Minnesota Valley HENNEP!N CO e Chanhassen Restoration Project Edi Prairie Minnesota Valley. ' •:.- I 1 Murphy's Landing • Site R22W • . -.•_ — 35 .... NationalRefuge Wildlife • \, _ fe'-‘ Histo N, , / c---- i -•••, ..\U n i t ,. r.7...„7.-...:.... .,:,..0._ .16.o.4,,it •-.-___,...- 4.7.44 ,______O -,- --"---.1 - • .....w--=-Imaiiirou -------. 7 I\ ---= . \ -- *6 *********orislinriti AV . ..........:....'''',--wink:Fi. 4 5 4 i wi •icLa ''s, : z.Aiglirrigillsteesrilit.114 au 1 < ce .4 . . s Er4,.....•googol wis ,.. s a - f-..v.e.'""1 -:"1-11 IS soill111111111 ila, = ..../,,,P-.tAli Milli 1111111 11111111111111111111m. e4,-. powNs .:. 1AVE >a. Ab 2rn dIVIE) IIIIIII 4E. •• ( _ •<..e.t. - 4Va'sii.......,,... . 111111 • , • I.„del tatotiall,,..4,,,e40....„-- 9"i3n, -av ------- 12 t . , 1 Ric • 1:: :: 1 . •,'EAST mOuND ST I,:: :3* -1 ' - - -..... , • '' ...AST CANO§T - i 166, Ilb, ss Lake . I : ,.....j."--':-- , t .% .s cc Shakopee , it C./KS',N cw 4., ., ,, ., . i, ..,_o ...-. ,v-..... '.,. ,9 4( 2 4. 17 0 .5 .i• , 16 14 13 le er C.1. •. •-•:: SI r s a co . I a .1-1213th SIM. cc v ce 'iv') * •1::. — • IP. 11 I.NORTH SHANNON .... .3n,-, . am 3 ce ,..:•> a. - 0 ,. RD 111 Q •-- - - • ;1341th ST. Am.sr....w A , .., ..... 130tA ,. if> ' . HILLSIDE OR. :::' . 2 11 7,.% >. 2.SOOTH SHANNON >: •:* 49 1 P . OAK RO. ,, 23 ' ta 24 41 $: '.",▪ WOODOUCK 11% .'--'''''...- - *. 'i •- .-,.- : ,,.- :;..":7'CI .:'-:-:.::.1% .-..: :. .I:i'.1.3,.....-„...._,G.„..7._•:......,.__._.:_ 2, .•.:,..''...-r-•••••-,r '....7.•>,7-'i- •:.• - :- .raj,:- • '" ' -----';''S•- ----r-n.-`4. ,- --,.._) • 140th ST. •. 4, al '•?. • fl..7-7 ......1..7.7•1r.gZr. ''',,•---- ...--, ._. t_-4-,, ....‘, _,:=0K0HLA510 OR '•Dowd•Ii,, o iii.-:.-.- 7--1 ::::,-f.'4i--4‘r. 'arm• . :i".-.- cr , -1.. o- ..., /• :. - _,474.,, a- .??.,.,: . ..2 I4, .... ..-7, -.% --1.12F.--:::•-•.t.. ..,.. . f". .---,"i•',... . . - ..• 1 :•?..•,..' ;,:::,...,i3 Ziz...-..-_ -. _,.„,....: ::::::::--: . ,........vs..,;_, 4: 26 teeth •I' Vw, I ') - '. 1 i , ',. : 2,5 e 1..)..ak•, , • 2'•• --N - 30 4 47 29 1.i•,. -• ••'mi.; , "..., . .•. .., _ -••• • . . ,:.-,'.:.,:-CE,-...• , / .......,,,,, ---: • . 14016 ST I.TYROL CA 44Z•14:4,11 - ' ce .4OR TON d ::.,. .,-:?%tilit 1 1::. '-.Pnor .:. ;....-.4-4,...,:.-_ Frror Cake , 2-TYR°L C:"' `t. mom W • . •' 3-TYROL L.N ( ,• ••••,.,> .., OR _ 4.8RENNER , Lake sk41 ,.;/. :U7, Ir. --:?..1.4 .-; - I .......: -;.-•1-0 ......,.,.::. •-,,,:. v -,-,.. Lake --!-.--1‘' ..., ( - ,,...' WIT I Saltndk I : lbs_k W_ . - (7 41\-144"-, _, 10.774P4, _ •... .- - .7.7.-..-_,..A„,a. -.-.: -, ,-4.,- - — 0 i UR* • I IV, 'Inell.'4rtr-,-;--, :7.3'S . -'''' `.. -'''''''''.',..„. s Nar • ''''` 7 ulorN•••7(._ . (---- , 35 11;0)36 ,•: 31 ^" ' •,:-.;•- Nrrig _a E ,-.i.:,--r le' .__, '6,04 . 44 3 I i i \ --'-',0e4-' ' aa...-- 0 • - ' 1.$.1-:22:: .',. i 'il I..,•A . ' ' ',.ir-. .-.''''-. 2 Ali:',4 -t''-Z-p 13' 51:. :•::: Marystown ...!, f -44al-pa-s Spniig ----r- .. T ..----(#1;,. , .:.'-i.,.--::4'•-•:-• A Via :'-:,t.... ... aIMM. .111•111 •.' .. '''. :: .."\I.:=1153.1 MD ME •••••• . . , .;1. , % 111.1474 p. • ,,... ,,,,, 0 ,-. . Hialat • 41: . . IGO tH ST E. _alt* 1 • wit ta... :.___•....-re: ,. ct. a ... ,_... , ;am - :.1 leis?sr E. y, I •0 ! 0 / Lair. , k.-• -- _..y..--_.•.:„:..-, •(:, . ,L, 5; 4% • ; •1 --. - . laawsimiritAti 'm ',:.:I'":',;11%'z----- &. .. . . 1 0 —GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP OF SCOTT COUNTY „.„....„..„,..„.„..•. ...,,,. _ ,7c,... ST.;.• *,-.. .:: 4 'C:c---.:,' ...----. Or -• , ,.-_ .._.......::...,-.... '31 L.v••• 11- _ :Lake _. . ../ , _ k i,„c1 • MINNESOTA .... ,08 Cr: - ,. 2 .7 1988 f''9 4)(3°'‘ 'i)': 74 ".' . " inm i ST.E.. ,„ c, • ‘•-- ‘.. . 4 q •>c•,••••2,- --Chrofy ...— , t+ C.16) 180th MAPLE OR 0 2 2 , si k- E 1 ;„ ,soth 4 . v ., . ,110,,,, ,J 41 CA g Z m4. L.' 0 ".... 3 IR 2 m 4 ST.E ' ,.-,.,; A. 494 / 0 1 2 :A. 2 3F) re c.)ET E. Ma' "c Cleary Lai 11;1 ' 1111.- >* ; Regronal Pa — xi Suck •1. eg 1 a .. a .4 i .1 ii--7 I , 2 0 171 r e ,..:LA L. L..3 ...........,,,1... /..... IIIIIIIIIIII M I 1.2$ Z., 2 VICTORIA AO t4•> 1 ST CA n E ! i . _..,..r.....r.,>i....1S'r.,"•• — I . - MC;11441/4.1k Sam AteJD COR 0i. r,4‘"/ (:)(j5 -i*ioA/ S - t4A-P z • r .�� ka yrs j-li . 750 i On LI o -....._,-CN..:...,....%%; sv:-: • -,\: z — -- —--:- --i.:-:,,, , °.-- _ 764 , a •�/ 1':1.� \\`�, .. .'• -_` __� of �\ q /��`�C /�,,,,,....., ___ '5p V �.� 00�� ,e 750 ,/3'r�,,,,,,, ,,,,,, ,., ! ._. . . h. , •\ 749 ---_ `_ -- • r ) ` I/ Q '' -_ _ , •� -4.... ... ..... • 0 . .-- ,...-IV ^ 44,,..n..)\‘ f e = .., - c\-st:?7,/ ---- (-) • 1(-- -. - CT •-/ -- v .---, --- o e 1/1 E A G L i �,�E z= ' •g\z_ - c " .830 `�,_�_, �'` - =4_�,- / Z `-� � - q ^ � � 14i rye? c �C— _ :G' sip>SCOP1fo 1 y \ f. : 852 =ilk,- ao - n 61 rs litik �1. --��. -`""-���,. 111 --%�-- /_ _ < ?"s , 1,�i �. iF`•' • Y•�o Vii, ;Q F r a _ : ) , --,�.. ;,...- ti ---:-....-i% ,r Jl ,•,. s— m. r. e a � I rte, �. -:.`-, . /^ , -c • am:i ;+9+\° L'� .' \``�\~J (1 �/1 �_ 1� r.51 _�/A_ _-• -' _- .-..._ /l',../.?..‘' .\ 21=►---1 - IIdD -2. - •A'I10N 2/^��1 ---_- ^�.'�`� ``- r�rG-J \ 6 1 ) . � '�' �,'„ 's7-------g.-‘s-11. iii= �e a' 462 46a 2 140 000 FEET I 27/30" °'64 (PRIOR LAKE 1:62 5001 466 L 7373 III SCALE 1:24000 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. * ►--. I 0 SW/4 MINNEAPOLIS 15' QUADRANGLE 0Mi MM 1000 E- 0 1000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7t4N4445—W9322.5/7.5 I ' I 1� .5 0 I KLLOM I---V - 1--. .-. I PHOTOREvISED 1972 0.18', ••ga MILS CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET AMS 7373 IV SW-SERIES V672 5 MILS. DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL 1 M K ci go7 _EA./ ass-r7% 4AP 3 • (ILA_ (444y5 il-Loc pleA-e-e-k cvf 4-10, proati . MAP A EXISTING CONDITIONS OF PROPERTY _ CITY LIMIT PROPERTY LINES CONTOUR LINES EXISTING STRUCTURES WELLS DRAINAGE EXISTING VEGETATION. NOTE * WEST SIDE OF PROPERTY HAS AN _ EXISTING TREE LINE A NATURAL SIGHT AND SOUND BARRIER . MAP B PROPOSED OPERATION AND LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CIRCLED NUMBERS NOTE DEPTH OF EXCAVATION LOCATION OF TAILING DEPOSITS LOCATION OF MACHINERY LOCATION OF MINED MATERIAL LOCATION OF PARKING EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL STRUCTURES NOTE * ACESS ROAD LOCATED IN RAVINE AGAIN A NATURAL BARRIER FOR SOUND AND SIGHT PHASE 1 I) BUILDING OF BERM ALONG WEST SIDE OF PROPERTY : TOP SOILS USED FOR THIS PURPOSE IA) PLANT TREES AROUND BERM IB) ERECT SILTATION POND IC) BUILD MAIN ACESS ROAD UP GRADE MCK;ENNA ROAD TO CO . -12 ID) CRUSHER TO BE SET UP MINIMUM 500 FT . FORM PROPERTY LINE IE) STOCK PILES MAX . OF 25 FT -- MAP C END USE FINAL GRADE _ LOCATION OF VEGETATION REPLANTED WEST SIDE OF MAPLE , PINE . ASH TREES AND SEED GRASSES LOCATION OF TYPES OF CROPS ALL GRADES ARE 18% OR LESS A GOOD USAGE FOR FARMING MAP D CROSS SECTION OF PROPERTY BERM . SILTATION FOND MAP E EXISTING TYPE AND GRADE OF TOP SOIL RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CHART TYPES OF SOIL AND GRADE USE OF SOIL AND GRADES FOR FARMING iV\C-KENAbk 9Al(7 4.0 GEAVEL /45\\4\,/ CPJ EsT Cod C . /4p 11 — -— I =.111211111114.1.- ... or '". '"'1 13 jr . . I P<1,' •' i.04. i . .. .1.1‹.-: 1 ...."..t. ., ...... -\..? I .. .m. if ... . .... 1 I 1 I r\ .°:7 -• 4, N'''", . ss........ %.'\ t •001 __) -i I ,........ N 1...../ i \ I 1 _ ' ........ ——— n.,..., -• .• --1 l'efff, 1 czit• 6.\)1, . 4 ......4, I - il ..,.. I • ;I•; i It ..+4,,' CMS .. • II .• • InC.1:44.11\ .0 4:...... ' i • . . 1--4..., Y • 1 --•- ...,.... 1 , _.,,, . ,,,,, ---1-1 - .., 1-, 6 I , ......, • 1 I AG 1__ ____.. .,_____ I . . . I t7r.u, Fis ...-r. ..... i . ! ..... 1 I I•ct. I \ti • ._. I • I i t i I I ;II ii....--______...'. . II 1 6 1 ***sr.- •••....... I CgOarel i%it, ft• w" apt lij I ...C.211194c *s.,. •••.,... a, --__ __ _____, i 6 te a I ; i a;40.1.‘t II.4i EIG!4 T 290 A: - — .. „ _ -_—___--1.---.----1........ . • I!,: 01 . AGgical.:17.4t4L. lir ...-----t,.....44z .=•-• I • . ' I PAST. < - 11111r. ..* k. I WO . ., ... •••=......... I Lo v./ - .... de I . VEN/S IT y • :. ? ; i _____ ____._,........_.. _____. ._. A. ; i „ , i i RtjR,44. • ---7, ----i , 1 . 44.1.c4iric-arriem,__ 1 f ....... . • • 1/i . i • I 1 1 --__-_, .- . i 1 1 AG AGRICULTURE _ I II I 01 .. i 154=144:6FLI ........4._ I RI RURAL RESIDENTIAL • i 1 i - 1 R2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL— R3 MID—DENSITY RES. PR I "M. ) ,(7.0: ! , I i i .3 R4 MULTI FAMILY RES. --. ii 1 1 ..ea • . r- --/-/ ---i 1 • a B1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS I c., 2$ ir---A. . ••••••1 2 7 . I il ._ B2 COMMUNITY BUSINES B3 CENTRAL BUSINESS _ i ••• ti. ! ' el i 11 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 12 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL 1 , S ..• ; _ S SHORELAND ).-. ..1 , . i . . NM FLOODPLAIN DISTF • ''- I • i : . c •\ . i . . ,; IP"." MANDAT . . ... •i . - •. '-': :.-.--•:•.1......-1- " 7:7 7.•'-• 1..:.:••• -f"'''..i...••.:*. ":.-:.-..7 7-,•: . :.-. .-'.-..:-.;•.:4 t ". • ...,.RTD RACETRACK 0 TP f . .. I\/1 c < ENINA S,i io 4,x7 Gr'acucz- E41,,J - Ocl t--31-7(,\l I f tr .......- ,, STATE OF 1 04414247 < 1950 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 07 DNR INFORMATION 500 LAFAYETTE ROAD • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55155-40 (612)296-6157 April 5, 1991 LeRoy Nyhus Nyhus Engineering Box 317 __ Henning, MN 56551 Re: proposed gravel mining and reclamation project in sec. 22, T115N R22W, city of Shakopee • Dear Mr. Nyhus: The Minnesota Natural Heritage database has been reviewed to determine if any rare plant or animal species or other significant natural features are known to occur within one mile of the above referenced project. Based on this review, there are no known occurrences of rare species or natural features in the area searched. - The Natural Heritage database is maintained by the Natural Heritage Program and the Nongame Wildlife Program, units within the Section of Wildlife, Department of Natural Resources. It is the most complete source of _ data on Minnesota's rare, endangered, or otherwise significant plant and animal species, plant communities, and other natural features, and is used in fostering better understanding and protection of these rare features. The information in the database is drawn from many parts of Minnesota, and is constantly being updated, but it not based on a comprehensive survey of the state. Therefore, there are currently many significant natural features present in the state which are not represented by the database. We are in the process of addressing this problem via the Minnesota County Biological Survey, a county-by-county inventory of rare natural features, which is now underway. Because there has not, to our knowledge, been an on-site survey of the biological resources of the project area, it is possible that ecologically significant features exist for which we have no record. Thank you for consulting us on this matter, and for your interest in minimizing impacts on Minnesota's rare resources. Please be aware that review by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Programs focuses only on rare natural features. It does not constitute review or approval by the Department of Natural Resources as a whole. Sincerely, _ • . 66.r),U4i q,&42,42Mr1,1 Bonita Eliason - Endangered Resource/Environmental Review Specialist 612/296-8324 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER w`c wed, s447 Q &A\IL E7k\Ai OsrJ /C, LHeB 4 IWaA OIL ( _ DbB iviiiiiiiil II S Sc_.o Piss AligirTcC., Irk ' ....—. a HeC2 • Sb HaE: 4 IL _ -__ ._ ,...... . ---:- HaC2 aB24 bE HaC HaE2 HaC ;� - �• ..-. , Ha tj ' 1 _HaE2 •,, 1 HaC HaE2 Wb HaB2 a0 HaB Q Lc$ ? 1lb - • - HaD2 LcB0 HaC2 . _...,.:. : . _ {7?-:-.,... .1 . .... ( wb mar p HaC2 Ill 111111 ,41 . - HaC . Wb HaB2 HaB2. 1 = - �� HcD3 ailik i• HaE2 I NHaE2tViAt % � ,, M� a., AU { � c HaD ��� 1711111Ga PaAig E �� 0 f 1� HaC i y _: : • et- ILI IF • (--?1"---Ii9-1-50;bD . a„'��yae. HaC2 GaL _ • 2 1v1C 146/414A SAAJP AdD C' - j4.AJ OuEsrzvAl 2 2 .4: . .... 41AFFitc •1...0 ... 4-z .... 1 -, .. • );'';' / "I. . 16 I ilIWIP" - •-. Buie :.AKe �s- .� •.— —(— i - '_-•• ` ` ) ,\‘ '---- -,111 ; • 11 I N �i` L L 7 aft - \Os ` 0 4 .� ' cc��` , as /� — ' — —II t Dean Loire (/`�, \ - - �sZ `,tea --' ?: ��^`�; } O EC:TO ! \ �(Qao • ZOOib9ZO * . ctsp � ,4 AG �• 4h ,6_411P1 o �` ...- lani le 112111 r.....0 ---t- 49 • ------.-- a V. . . olo F9 , 23 \r'qa . • > - Ilk . I ' I i IltidplIll.'llr4rjg • 11.11.111.11,111 - Puce ' Lc I s OQom C , i - 7 • iik, - - •-- ---a...p.....__ 4pki. "MrCCI RO• Viz. f 1 $o _ I7 - €1 fj20I0� -�, � ( . 0 0 28i' 27 • it. 26 , . • - Si I - • . I /p • • �Y a `: • N DRAINAGE REPORT FOR McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA June 29, 1990 Rev. 3-26-91 NYHUS ENGINEERING 2745'WINNETKA AV. N. , SUITE 243 P.O. BOX 27100 GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 TELE: 1-800-446-5038 • - I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DATE: JUNE 29, 1990 Minn. Reg. No. 10981 DRAINAGE REPORT FOR McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA June 29, 1990 Rev. 3-26-91 — INTRODUCTION "- This report covers the 1 year-24 hour, 10 year-24 hour, 100 year-24 hour, 100 year snow melt, and the 100 year-10 day storms for the developed condition from the proposed McKenna Sand & Gravel mining in section 22; T. 115 N. , R. 22 W. , Scott County, Minnesota. Storm water runoff from adjacent property was also considered. The property lies within the Dean Lake Watershed District. The drainage sub- basin for the developed condition is shown on the attached U.S. Geological Survey map. — Two TR-20 Computer runs were made. The first is of the project site. The second is of the entire sub-basin. CONCLUSIONS The 100 year-24 hour storm has the greatest runoff rate and the 100 year-10 — day storm has the greatest volume of runoff. The City of Shakopee has recently adopted a storm water policy that limits the - flow rate from a developing area to 1/3 c.f.s. This flow rate can be achieved for the developing area by constructing a detention pond. The flow from the adjacent sub-basin area will be passed through without storage. A triangular shaped pond for removing silt and phosphorus will be constructed based upon the W. Walker method. This pond will be constructed in the same location as the detention pond. RUNOFF RATE (C.F.S.) lyr-24hr 10yr-24hr 100yr-24hr 100yr-Snow Melt 100yr-10day — Sub-basin 6.42 27.87 93.86 11.76 48.59 Site 3.65 8.98 12.36 5.15 10.36 — All areas disturbed during construction will be seeded and erosion control bales or silt fences will be placed as needed to prevent erosion onto undisturbed areas. DESIGN DATA The "Soil Survey Scott County, Minnesota" prepared by the United States _ Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service was used to determine the type of soil and hydrologic group. The rainfall for the 1 year-24hour, 100 year-24 hour, and 100 year-10 day storms was obtained from the "Hydrology Guide For Minnesota", Fig. 1-2, Fig. 1-8 and Fig. 1-11 respectively. The runoff for the 100 year-10 day snowmelt was obtained from Fig. 1-12 of the above reference. -2- DRAINAGE REPORT McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL The runoff rate and volume for all the storms were determined using the TR-20 Computer Program for "Project Formulation - Hydrology" (1982 Version) . The structure no. is shown on the attached map. The input and output for the above are presented in the appendix. The Curve Numbers (CN) were determined using Fig. 3-1 and 3-2 in the "Hydrology Guide For Minnesota". The time of concentration was calculated by using the formulas in Eq. 15.3 and Eq. 15.4 in the "National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology" The paper "Phosphorus Removal By Urban Runoff Detention Basins in Minnesota" by William W. Walker was the basis for design of the sediment and phosphorus removal pond. CALCULATIONS SOILS Symbol Name Hydrologic Group HaE2 Hayden B HaB2 Hayden B HaC2 Hayden B HbE2 Hayden - . B — HaC Hayden B Sb Hayden-Lester B TcC Terril B • The soil hydrologic group is B. HYDROLOGIC CURVE NUMBERS . SUB-BASIN COVER PRACTICE CONDITION ACRES PER CURVE NO. PRODUCT NO. ROTATION PRACTICE CN PIT AREA FOREST GOOD 2.50 60 150.00 PASTURE GRASS LAND GOOD 19.60 70 1,372.00 ROW CROP STR. ROW GOOD 14.50 78 1.131.00 TOTAL = 36.60 2,653.00 WEIGHTED RUNOFF CURVE NO. = 72.5 OFF SITE FOREST GOOD 8.70 60 522.00 AREA PASTURE GRASS LAND GOOD 15.00 70 1,050.00 ROW CROP STR. ROW GOOD 23.00 78 1,794.00 RESIDENT 10.00 65 650.00 TOTAL = 56.70 4,016.00 WEIGHTED RUNOFF CURVE NO. = 70.8 COMBINED TOTAL = 93.30 6,669.00 WEIGHTED RUNOFF CURVE NO. = 71.5 -3- DRAINAGE REPORT McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL TIME OF CONCENTRATION SUB-BASIN PIT AREA LENGTH 1 = 1300 FALL 1 = 13 CN = 73 LENGTH 2 = 0 FALL 2 = 0 CN = 0 TIME Cl = 0.80 HR TIME C2 = 0.00 HR TOTAL TC = 0.80 HR COMBINED LENGTH 1 = 2100 FALL 1 = 67 CN = 71 AREA LENGTH 2 = 1300 FALL 2 = 13 CN = 73 TIME Cl = 0.70 HR — TIME C2 = 0.80 HR TOTAL TC = 1.50 HR The runoff rate and volume for the 10 year-24 hour and 100 year-24 hour storms were determined using the TR-20 Computer Program for "Project Formulation - Hydrology" (1982 Version) . The input and printout for the above are presented in the appendix. -4- DRAINAGE REPORT McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL s c Emma ma. 4 1 SUB — BASIN MAP i( ti ,_ I II I I I z 0 ,y ii I V 1I! X60 +�;` : 7::17-=-: -_ .'i 1 TA.---_t / II • -----2 -- --- --- j*Iii7/741ril / ..... ..".'""Pl q , 110./// ( , as 1'?: ///' 4441P/4 .s.�_. .p,40Alcli - j . I 4r-E-foN., ... ", s I tki. i ‘, . vii I I ) , U - Kc\ -- . glIllIllIllgr*`Sv8 - 13.4Sint 80vni0RR I 1 McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL 1 NYHUS ENGINEERING r 1 1 -800-446-5038 149O T120 IEQ 03-26-91 09:34 bcIENNA SAND fi GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION IT1-248R 10 YR-24 81 100 YR-2481 100 !I-SNOW !TELT 100 YEAR-I0 DAT PAGE i .SUB - 8ASI N tttttsttttxttttttx80-80 LIST OF INPUT DATA FOR TL-20 BTDROLOGYsxtstssstttttttttt J 8 TR-10 FULLPRINT SUMMARY - T TLE 061 MCIENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION TOTAL SUR-BASIN AREA 1Y1-2481 T TLE 10 YR-24 81 [00 11-24R1 100 Tl-SMOV MELT 100 YEA1-10 DAY STRUCT 01 820.0 0.0 0. ._ 821.0 5.47 0.66 822.0 7.75 1.413 823.0 9.48 2.265 824.0 10.94 3.222 825.0 12.24 4.291 - 825.1 12.36 4.404 826.0 83.98 5.454 826.11 95.39 5.62 827.0 180. 6.789 - ENDTSL RAINF! 7 I .0200 .0000 .0080 .0162 .0246 .0333 .0425 .0524 .0630 .0743 .0863 .0990 .1124 .1265 .1420 .1595 - .1800 .2050 .2550 .3450 .4310 .5300 .6030 .6330 .6600 .6840 .7050 .1240 .1420 .7590 .7150 .1900 .8043 .8180 .8312 .8439 .8561 .8618 .8190 .8898 .9002 .9103 .9201 .9291 .9391 .9483 .9573 .9661 .9147 .9832 .9916 a 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 ENDTE L - RA[NFL 9 2.4 .0 .00402 .00809 .01221 .01638 .02061 .02489 .02923 .03363 .03810 .04263 .04123 .05191 .05606 .06149 .0664 .0714 .01649 .08167 .08645 .09234 .09784 .10345 .10918 .11505 .12105 .12720 .13351 .13999 .14665 .15351 .16058 .16788 .11543 .18326 .19139 .19986 .20871 .21799 .22176 - .23809 .24908 .26086 .27359 .28751 .30297 .32053 .34118 .36691 .40388 .56388 .61410 .64474 .66758 .68652 .70294 .71758 .13087 .74310 .75447 .16512 .11516 .78468 .19314 .8024 - .8101 .81868 .82637 .83379 .84097 .84793 .85469 .86126 .86765 .87388 .87996 .88589 .89169 .89736 .90291 . .90835 .91368 .9189 .924 .929 - .4339 .9387 .9434 .948 .9525 .9569 .9612 .9654 .9695 .9135 .9714 .9812 .9844 .985 .985 ENDTBL RUNOFF 1 01 7 .144 72. 1.5 1 1 1 I RESVOR 2 01 7 6 820.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 SAVMOV 5 010 1 2 ENDATA - IOMMPUTT 1 .10 01 009 CO2.40 1.0 2 2 01 01 ENDCMP 1 COMPUT 7 01 009 4.20 1.0 2 2 01 02 ENDCMP 1 COMPUT 7 01 009 6.00 1.0 2 2 01 03 ENDCMP 1 INSERT 2 009 RUNOFF 1 01 7 .144 100. 1.5 I 1 1 1 - LESYOR 2 01 1 6 820.0 1 I 1 1 1 SAYMOV S 009 6 1 SAYMOY S 010 1 2 ENDATA INCREM 6 1.0 - COMPUT 7 01 009 7.2 240. 1 2 01 04 ENDCMP 1 INSERT 2 009 RUNOFF 1 01 7 .144 54. 1.5 1 I 1 1 RESVOR 2 01 7 6 820.0 1 1 1 1 1 SAYMOV 5 009 1 2 TR20 180 03-26-91 09:34 McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION 1YR-24HR 10 T1-24 HR 100 YR-2481 100 TR-SMOW MELT 100 YEAR-10 DAY PAGE 2 ENDATA - 7 INCREM 6 1.0 7 COMPUT 1 01 009 10.96 1.0 9 2 01 05 ENDCMP I ENDJOB 2 - OtttttsttsttsttttsttsttsttttststEND OF 80-80 LISTtttt*tttsttttttttttttttttttttttt +EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION INCREN RECORD ID MAIN TINE INCREMENT : .10 HOURS EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT RECORD ID + FROM STRUCTURE 1 + TO XSECTION 9 STARTING TIME : .00 RAIN DEPTH : 2.40 RAIN DURATION: 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO.: 2 ANT. HOIST. CORD: 2 ALTERNATE NO.: [ STORM NO.: I MAIN TIME INCREMENT : .10 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE 1 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: 7 AREA: .14 SQ MI INPUT RUNOFF CURVE= 12. TIME OF CONCENTRATION: 1.50 HOURS INTERNAL HYDROGRAPE TIME INCREMENT: .1000 HOURS PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 13.03 [3.60 (RUNOFF) 23.80 1.33 (RUNOFF) + t t FIRST POINT OF FLAT PEAK - TI E':.HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT : .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT : .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .14 SQ.MI. 11.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 .05 .25 12.00 DISCHG .71 1.62 2.80 4.38 6.32 8.37 10.19 11.62 12.65 13.29 13.00 DISCEG 13.58 13.51 13.22 12.69 11.91 11.03 10.25 9.51 8.95 8.39 14.00 DISCHG 1.38 7.39 6.93 6.51 6.14 5.19 5.47 5.17 4.90 4.65 15.00 DISCEG 4.42 4.21 4.02 3.84 3.69 3.54 3.41 3.29 3.19 3.09 16.00 DISCHG 3.00 2.u2 2.85 2.19 2.73 2.67 2.62 2.58 2.54 2.50 17.00 DISCEG 2.41 2.43 2.40 2.36 2.32 2.29 2.26 2.23 2.20 2.17 _ 18.00 DISCHG 2.15 2.12 2.10 2.01 2.04 2.01 1.98 1.94 1.91 1.38 19.00 DISCEG 1.85 1.82 1.80 1.78 1.77 1.15 1.14 1.74 1.73 1.12 20.00 DISCHG 1.11 1.70 1.64 1.67 1.64 1.62 1.58 1.55 1.52 1.49 21.00 DISCEG 1.46 1.44 1.42 1.40 1.38 1.31 1.36 1.35 1.34 1.34 22.00 DISCHG 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.32 23.00 DISCHG 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.32 [.32 1.32 1.33 1.32 24.00 DISCHG 1.32 1.31 1.29 1.26 1.22 1.16 1.08 1.00 .90 .80 25.00 DISCHG .71 .01 .53 .45 .38 .32 .27 .23 .20 .17 :6.00 DISCHG .i4 .12 .10 .09 .07 .06 .05 .04 .04 .03 27.00 DISCHG .03 .02 .02 .02 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE 3ASEFLOW : .48 WATERSHED INCHES, 44.37 CFS-ERS. 3.67 ACRE-FEET; BASEYLON : .00 CFS - OPERATION RESYOR STRUCTURE 1 INPUT 3YDROGRAPH: 1 OUT?UT RYDROGRAPH: 6 SURFACE ELEVATION: 820.00 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 14.33 6.42 821.42 TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT : .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .I4 SQ.MI. 11.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 - 11.00 !LEY 820.30 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 12.00 DISCHG .05 .12 .26 .48 .80 1.24 1.11 2.31 3.02 3.68 12.00 ELEV 820.01 820.02 820.05 820.09 820.15 820.23 820.32 820.43 820.55 820.67 13.00 DISCEG 4.33 4.94 5.48 5.66 5.83 5.91 6.08 6.18 6.25 6.31 13.00 ELEV 820.79 820.90 821.00 821.08 821.16 821.22 821.27 821.31 821.34 821.37 14.00 DISCEG 6.36 6.39 6.41 6.42 6.41 6.40 6.38 6.36 6.32 6.29 14.00 ELEV 821.39 821.40 821.41 821.41 821.41 821.41 821.40 821.39 821.37 821.36 15.00 DISCHG 6.24 6.20 6.14 6.09 6.03 5.91 5.91 5.85 5.18 5.72 15.00 ELEV 821.34 821.32 821.30 821.21 821.25 821.22 821.19 821.11 821.14 821.11 - 16.00 DISCEG 5.65 5.59 5.52 5.42 5.24 5.08 4.91 4.16 4.62 4.48 16.00 80 821.08 821.05 821.02 820.99 820.96 820.93 820.90 820.81 820.94 820.82 11.00 DISCHG 4.34 4.22 4.10 3.99 3.88 3.77 3.61 3.58 3.49 3.40 17.00 ELEV 820.79 820.11 820.75 820.13 820.11 820.69 820.67 820.65 820.64 820.62 18.00 DISCHG 3.32 3.24 3.17 3.09 3.03 2.96 2.90 2.83 2.11 2.12 18.00 ELK? 820.61 820.59 820.58 820.51 820.55 820.54 820.53 820.52 820.51 820.50 19.00 DISCEG 2.66 2.60 2.55 2.50 2.4S 2.41 2.36 2.32 2.28 2.25 19.00 ELEV 820.49 820.48 820.41 820.46 820.45 820.44 820.43 820.42 820.42 820.41 20.00 DISCEG 2.21 2.18 2.15 2.11 2.08 2.05 2.02 1.99 1.96 1.93 - 20.00 ELEV 820.+0 820.40 820.39 820.39 820.38 820.38 820.31 820.36 820.36 820.35 T120 REQ 03-26-91 09:34 !HENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION ITR-2481 10 Y1-24 at 100 Y1-2401 100 YR-SMOW MELT 100 YEA1-10 DAY PAGE 3 21.00 DISCBC 1.90 1.87 1.84 1.81 1.19 1.16 1.13 1.71 1.68 1.66 21.00 ELEV 820.35 820.34 820.34 820.33 820.33 820.32 820.32 820.31 820.31 820.30 22.00 DISCHG 1.64 1.62 1.60 1.58 1.56 1.55 1.53 1.52 1.51 1.49 22.00 ELEV 820.30 820.30 820.29 820.29 820.29 820.28 820.28 820.28 820.28 820.27 23.00 DISCHG 1.48 1.41 1.46 1.45 1.44 1.44 1.43 1.42 1.41 1.41 23.00 ELEV 820.21 820.27 820.27 820.27 820.26 820.26 820.26 820.26 820.26 820.26 24.00 DISCHG 1.40 1.40 1.39 1.38 1.31 [.36 1.35 1.33 1.30 1.21 24.00 ELEV 820.26 820.26 820.25 820.25 820.25 820.25 820.25 820.24 820.24 820.23 25.00 DISCEG [.24 [.20 [.16 1.11 1.07 1.02 .91 .92 .88 .83 25.00 ELEV 820.23 820.22 320.21 820.20 820.19 820.19 820.18 820.17 820.I6 820.15 26.00 DISCHG .19 .74 .70 .66 .62 .58 .55 .52 .49 .46 26.00 ELEV 820.14 820.14 820.13 820.12 820.11 820.11 820.10 820.09 820.09 820.08 21.00 DISCBC .43 .40 .38 .35 .33 .31 .29 .27 .25 .24 - 27.00 ELEV 820.08 820.01 820.07 820.06 820.06 820.06 820.05 820.05 820.05 820.04 28.00 DISCHG .22 .21 .19 .18 .17 .16 .15 .14 .13 .12 28.00 ELEV 820.04 820.04 820.04 820.03 820.03 820.03 820.03 820.02 820.02 820.02 29.00 DISCHG .11 .10 .10 .09 .08 .08 .07 .07 .06 .06 29.00 ELEV 320.02 820.02 820.02 820.02 820.02 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE 3ASEFLOW : .48 WATERSHED INCHES, 44.28 CFS-HRS, 3.66 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CPS OPERATION SAYMOV CROSS SECTION 9 INPUT BYDROGRAPH: 6 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: I EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP RECORD ID - COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 1 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION CORFU! RECORD ID * PROM STRUCTURE 1 TO XSECTION 9 STARTING TIME : .00 RAIN DEPTH : 4.20 RAIN DURATION: 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO.: 2 ANT. MOIST. CORD: 2 ALTERNATE NO.: I STORM NO.: 2 MAIN TIME INCREMENT : .10 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE 1 OUTPUT HYDROGRAFE: 7 AREA: .14 SQ MI INPUT RUNOFF CURVE: 72. TIME OF CONCENTRATION: 1.50 HOURS INTERNAL HYDROGRAPH TIME INCREMENT: .1000 HOURS - PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCBARGE(CFS) PEAK ILEVATION(?FET) 12.92 55.26 RUNOFF 23.10 3.34 RUNOFF, • t FIRST POINT OF ?LAT PEAK -• TIME(dRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT : .00 SOURS TIME INCREMENT : .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .14 SQ.MI. 10.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 .02 .04 .01 .12 11.00 DISCHG .19 .28 .41 .51 .71 1.u2 1.31 1.94 2.92 4.75 • - 12.00 DISCHG 1.95 12.55 18.37 25.43 33.32 40.36 47.20 51.61 54.23 55.22 13.00 DISCHG 54.34 53.09 50.57 47.21 43.34 39.33 35.37 32.94 30.29 27.95 14.00 DISCHG 25.86 23.91 22.11 20.52 19.11 11.81 16.64 15.58 14.62 13.74 15.00 DISCHG 12.95 12.23 11.59 11.01 10.49 10.01 9.59 9.21 8.81 8.55 16.00 DISCHG 8.21 8.02 7.79 7.58 7.39 7.21 7.05 6.90 6.77 6.66 17.00 DISCHG 6.56 6.46 6.35 6.25 6.14 6.04 5.95 5.86 5.18 5.71 18.00 DISCHG 5.63 5.57 5.50 5.42 5.33 5.24 5.15 5.05 4.96 4.88 19.00 DISCHG 4.30 4.73 4.66 4.61 4.57 4.53 4.50 4.48 4.46 4.44 20.00 DISCHG 4.41 4.38 4.34 4.29 4.72 4.14 4.06 3.98 3.90 3.32 - 21.00 DISCHG 3.74 3.67 3.61 3.56 3.52 3.49 3.46 3.44 3.42 3.40 22.00 DISCHG 3.39 3.37 3.31 3.36 3.35 3.35 3.34 3.34 3.34 3.33 23.00 DISCHG 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.34 3.34 3.33 24.00 DISCHG 3.32 3.30 3.25 3.17 3.06 2.91 2.72 2.50 2.26 2.01 25.00 DISCHG 1.77 1.54 1.32 1.13 .95 .80 .68 .58 .49 .42 26.00 DISCHG .35 .30 .25 .22 .18 .15 .13 .11 .09 .08 27.00 DISCEG .01 .06 .05 .04 .03 .03 .02 .02 .01 .01 28.00 DISCHG .01 .01 .01 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE 3ASEFLOW : 1.60 WATERSHED INCHES, 148.36 CFS-HRS, 12.30 ACRE-FEET; BASEPLOW = .00 CPS OPERATION RESYOR STRUCTURE I INPUT HYDROGRAPH: 7 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: 6 • - SURFACE ELEVATION: 820.00 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEYATION(FEET) 13.92 21.87 825.29 - TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT : .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT :. .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .14 SQ.MI. T220 XEQ 03-26-41 09:34 M1KENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION IYR-2601 10 YR-24 HR 100 TR-2401 100 YR-SMOR MELT 100 TEAR-10 DAY PAGE 4 10.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 .01 10.00 ELEY 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 11.00 DISCHG .02 .04 .06 .09 .12. .18 .24 .34 .41 .10 11.00 ELEV 820.00 820.01 820.01 820.02 820.02 820.03 820.04 820.06 820.09 820.13 12.00 DISCHG 1.07 1.68 2.59 3.81 5.50 6.29 7.22 8.09 8.84 9.57 - 12.00 ELEV 820.20 820.31 820.47 820.71 821.01 821.36 821.71 822.20 822.63 823.06 13.00 DISCHG 10.14 10.69 11.15 11.53 11.87 12.16 [4.16 23.06 26.83 27.84 13.00 OLE? 823.45 823.83 824.16 824.45 824.11 824.94 825.12 825.23 825.28 825.29 14.00 DISCHG 27.43 26.31 24.86 23.30 21.71 20.31 18.96 11.70 16.56 15.51 14.00 ELEY 825.29 825.28 825.26 825.24 825.22 825.20 825.18 825.17 825.15 825.14 15.00 DISCHG 14.56 13.69 12.91 12.36 12.34 12.32 12.30 12.28 12.25 12.21 I5.00 ELEY 825.13 825.12 825.11 825.10 825.09 825.07 825.05 825.03 825.01 824.98 16.00 DISCHG 12.18 12.14 I2.09 12.05 12.00 11.96 11.91 11.86 11.81 11.76 16.00 ELEY 824.95 824.92 824.39 824.85 824.82 824.78 824.75 824.11 824.67 824.63 - 11.00 DISCHG 11.71 11.65 11.60 11.55 11.50 11.44 11.39 11.33 11.28 11.22 17.00 ELEY 824.59 824.55 824.51 824.41 824.43 824.39 824.34 824.30 824.26 824.22 [8.00 DISCHG 11.17 11.11 11.05 11.00 10.94 10.87 10.80 10.13 10.66 10.59 18.00 ELEY 824.17 824.13 824.09 824.05 824.00 823.95 823.91 823.86 823.81 823.76 19.00 DISCHG 10.51 10.44 10.37 10.30 10.23 10.16 10.09 10.01 9.95 9.33 19.00 ELEY 823.11 823.66 823.61 823.56 823.51 823.46_ 823.41 823.37 823.32 823.27 20.00 DISCEC 9.31 9.74 9.67 9.61 9.54 9.41 9.38 9.24 9.20 9.11 20.00 ELEY 823.22 823.18 823.13 323.09 823.04 822.99 822.94 822.39 822.84 822.74 21.00 DISCEC 9.02 8.94 8.85 8.16 8.67 8.59 8.50 8.42 8.33 8.25 - 11.00 ELEY 822.14 822.69 822.63 822.58 822.53 822.48 822.43 822.39 822.34 822.29 :2.00 DISCEC 8.17 8.09 8.01 7.94 7.86 7.18 1.69 7.58 7.48 7.38 22.00 OLE? 822.24 822.20 822.15 822.1I 822.06 822.02 821.97 821.93 82I.38 821.84 23.00 DISCHG 1.28 7.18 1.08' 6.99 6.90 6.31 6.73 6.64 6.56 6.48 13.00 ELi'I 821.79 821.75 821.71 821.67 821.63 82I.59 821.55 821.51 321.48 821.44 24.00 DISCEG 6.40 6.33 6.25 6.18 6.10 6.02 5.94 5.36 5.78 5.0 14.00 ELEV 321.41 821.38 321.24 321.31 821.28 321.24 321.21 821.11 821.13 821.09 25.00 DISCHG 5.59 5.44 5.27 5.00 4.74 4.48 4.23 3.99 3.71 3.55 25.00 31117 821.05 821.01 820.96 820.91 820.87 820.82 820.17 820.73 820.69 820.65 - 26.00 DISCHG 3.34 3. 4 2.95 2.11 2.60 2.44 2.29 2.14 2.01 1.38 26.00 ELEY 820.61 320.51 820.54 820.51 820.48 820.45 820.42 820.39 820.37 820.34 27.00 DISCEG 1.76 1.65 1.54 1.44 1.35 1.26 1.18 MO[0 1.03 .96 27.00 OLE? 820.32 820.30 820.23 320.26 820.25 820.23 820.22 820.20 320.19 820.18 - 28.00 DISCEC .90 .84 .19 .13 .69 .64 .60 .56 .52 .49 23.00 ELEV 820.16 820.15 820.14 820.13 820.13 820.12 820.11 820.10 820.10 820.09 29.00 DISCHG .45 .42 .40 .37 .35 .32 .30 .28 .26 .25 29.00 OLE? 820.08 820.08 820.07 820.01 820.06 820.06 820.06 820.05 820.05 820.04 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOV = 1.60 VATERSHED INCHES, 148.56 CFS-ERS, 12.28 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOH = .00 CFS OPERATION SAVMOV CROSS SECTION 9 INPUT HYDROGRAPH: 6 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: I EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP RECORD ID COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 2 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT RECORD ID FROM STRUCTURE 1 + TO XSECTION 9 STARTING TIME = .00 RAIN DEPTH : 6.00 RAIN DURATION= 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO.: 2 ANT. MOIST. COND: 2 ALTERNATE NO.: 1 STORM 30.: 3 MAIN TIME INCREMENT : .I0 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE 1 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: 1 AREA= .14 SQ MI INPUT RUNOFF CURVE= 72. TIME OF CONCENTRATION: 1.50 HOURS INTERNAL HYDROGRAPE TIME INCREMENT= .1000 HOURS PEAR TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.39 107.46 RUNOFF 23.67 5.45 RUNOFF TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT : .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT : .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .14 SQ.MI. 8.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 .02 4.00 DISCHG .03 .06 .09 .13 .19 .25 .33 .43 .53 .64 10.00 DISCEG .77 .91 1.06 1.22 1.39 1.58 1.79 2.03 2.29 2.60 11.00 DISCHG 2.95 3.36 0.83 4.36 4.98 5.69 6.63 8.05 10.33 14.30 - 12.00 DISCHG 20.89 30.11 41.53 55.11 69.93 83.93 95.04 102.50 106.51 107.43 13.00 DISCHG 105.14 101.52 95.91 88.97 81.00 13.06 66.25 60.49 55.34 50.30 14.00 DISCEG 46.75 43.01 39.59 36.58 33.90 31.46 29.28 27.31 25.53 23.90 15.00 DISCHG 22.46 21.15 19.98 18.92 17.98 17.12 16.36 15.67 15.06 14.49 16.00 DISCHG 13.99 13.54 13.13 12.16 12.41 12.10 11.81 11.55 11.32 11.12 - 11.00 DISCHG 10.95 10.17 10.59 10.41 10.22 10.05 9.89 9.14 9.60 9.48 TR20 XEQ 03-26-91 09:34 McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION 1Y1-24HR 10 YR-24 it 100 YR-2481 100 1R-SMOW MELT 100 YEAR-10 DAY PAGE 5 [8.00 DISCHG 9.35 9.24 9.12 8.99 8.84 8.69 8.53 8.37 8.21 8.07 19.00 DISCHG 1.93 7.81 1.11 1.62 1.54 1.48 1.43 1.39 7.35 1.31 20.00 DISCEG 1.27 1.22 1.15 1.06 6.95 6.82 6.68 6.54 6.41 6.27 21.00 DISCEG 6.15 6.04 5.94 5.35 5.79 5.13 5.68 5.64 5.61 5.58 22.00 DISCHG 5.55 5.53 5.52 5.50 5.49 5.48 5.41 S.41 5.46 5.46 23.00 DESCEG 5.46 S.45 5.45 5.45 5.45 5.45 5.45 5.45 5.45 5.44 24.00 DISCEG 5.42 5.38 5.30 5.17 4.99 4.14 4.43 4.01 3.68 3.28 25.00 DISCHG 2.89 2.51 2.16 1.84 1.55 1.31 1.11 .94 .80 .68 26.00 DISCHG .58 .49 .41 .35 .30 .25 .21 .18 .15 .13 21.00 DISCHG .11 .09 .08 .06 .05 .04 .04 .03 .02 .02 28.00 DISCEG .02 .01 .01 .01 .00 RUNG?F VOLUME ABOVE 3ASEFLOW : 2.99 WATERSHED INCHES, 218.15 CFS-HRS, 22.99 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW.: .00 CFS OPERATION RESVOR STRUCTURE 1 INPUT HYDROGRAPH: 7 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH= 6 _ SURFACE ELEVATION: 320.00 PEAK TIME(3RS) PEAK DISCRARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 13.24 93.86 826.10 TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAP3 POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .14 SQ.MI. 9.00 DISCHG .00 .01 .01 .02 .03 .04 .06 .08 .10 .14 9.00 ELEV 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.01 820.01 820.0I 820.02 820.02 10.00 DISCHG .11 .22 .27 .33 .39 .46 .55 .64 .74 .85 ._ 10.00 ELEY 820.03 820.04 920.05 820.06 820.07 820.08 820.10 820.12 820.13 820.16 11.00 DISCEG .98 1.12 1.29 1.47 1.68 1.93 2.21 2.55 2.99 3.60 11.00 ELEY 820.18 820.21 320.23 820.27 320.31 920.35 820.40 820.47 820.55 820.66 12.00 DISCEG 4.53 5.64 6.38 7.42 8.44 9.56 10.56 11.52 15.50 55.12 12.00 ELEY 820.83 821.07 821.40 821.36 822.40 823.05 323.74 824.45 825.14 825.64 - 13.00 DISCEG 18.09 89.35 93.50 93.03 89.41 33.97 17.61 71.33 65.46 60.01 13.00 ELEY 825.93 826.05 826.09 826.09 826.05 826.00 825.92 825.84 925.11 825.70 14.00 DISCEG 55.01 50.59 46.51 42.80 39.48 36.49 33.80 31.38 29.20 21.22 14.00 ELEY 825.64 825.58 825.53 825.48 825.44 825.40 825.37 825.34 825.31 825.29 _ 15.00 DISCEG 25.45 23.85 22.40 21.10 19.44 18.89 11.94 17.09 16.33 15.65 15.00 ELEY 825.26 925.24 825.23 825.21 825.20 825.18 825.11 825.16 825.15 825.14 16.00 DISCEG 15.03 14.41 13.91 13.52 13.11 12.74 12.39 12.35 12.35 12.34 16.00 ELEY 825.13 825.13 825.12 825.11 825.11 825.10 825.10 825.10 825.09 825.08 11.00 DISCRG 12.33 12.31 12.30 12.28 12.21 12.25 12.22 12.20 [2.18 12.15 17.00 ELEY 825.01 825.06 825.05 825.04 825.02 825.01 824.99 824.97 824.95 824.93 18.00 DESCHG 12.12 12.09 12.06 12.03 12.00 11.97 11.94 11.90 11.81 11.83 18.00 ELEY 824.91 824.89 824.36 824.34 824.32 824.19 824.77 824.14 824.71 824.68 15.00 DISCEG 1I.79 11.15 11.71 11.67 11.63 11.59 11.55 11.51 11.46 11.42 19.00 ELEY 824.65 824.62 324.59 824.56 324.53 824.50 824.41 324.44 824.40 824.37 20.00 DISCEG 11.38 11.34 11.30 11.26 11.2i 11.11 11.13 11.08 11.04 10.99 20.00 ELEY 824.34 324.31 824.28 824.24 824.21 824.13 324.14 824.31 824.01 824.04 21.00 DESCHG 10.44 10.88 10.82 10.76 10.70 10.63 10.57 10.51 10.45 10.39 21.00 ELEY 824.00 823.96 823.42 823.38 823.33 823.79 823.75 823.71 823.66 823.62 22.00 DISCEG 10.33 10.27 10.21 10.15 10.09 10.03 9.98 9.12 9.86 9.81 22.00 ELEY 823.58 823.54 923.50 823.46 823.42 823.38 823.34 823.30 823.26 823.23 23.00 DISCHG 9.75 9.10 9.65 9.59 9.54 9.49 9.43 9.36 9.30 9.23 23.00 ELEY 823.19 823.15 823.11 823.08 323.04 823.01 822.91 822.93 822.39 822.36 _. 24.00 DISCHG 9.17 9.11 9.04 8.98 8.92 8.35 8.18 8.10 8.62 8.54 24.00 ELEY 822.82 822.78 822./5 822.71 822.61 822.63 822.59 822.55 822.50 822.45 25.00 DISCHG 8.45 8.35 8.25 8.15 8.04 7.93 1.32 7.68 1.51 1.35 25.00 ELEY 822.40 322.35 822.29 822.23 322.17 822.10 822.04 321.97 821.90 821.32 26.00 DISCEG 1.18 1.02 6.35 6.69 6.54 6.38 6.23 6.08 5.93 5.19 26.00 ELEY 821.15 821.68 821.61 821.54 821.47 821.40 821.33 821.27 821.20 821.14 27.00 DISCHG 5.65 5.51 5.23 4.38 4.56 4.27 3.99 3.12 3.48 3.25 27.00 ELEY 821.08 821.02 820.96 820.39 820.33 820.78 820.13 820.68 820.64 820.59 28.00 DISCHG 3.04 2.84 2.65 2.41 2.31 2.16 2.01 1.88 1.76 1.64 _ 28.00 ELEY 820.56 820.52 820.48 820.45 820.42 820.39 820.37 820.34 820.32 820.30 29.00 DISCHG 1.53 1.43 1.34 1.25 1.16 1.09 1.02 .95 .89 .83 29.00 ELEY 820.28 820.26 820.24 820.23 820.21 820.20 820.19 820.17 820.16 820.15 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE HASEFLOW : 2.98 WATERSHED INCHES, 277.32 CPS-HRS, 22.92 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW : .00 CPS OPERATION SAVNOV CROSS SECTION 9 INPUT BYDROGRAPH: 6 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: 1 _ EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP RECORD ID + COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 3 TR20 XEQ 03-26-91 09:34 McKENNA SAND k GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION IY1-26H1 10 Y1-24 HR I00 11-24111 100 TR-SMOW MELT 100 YEAR-10 DAY PAGE 6 OCHANGES TO STANDARD CONTROL LIST FOLLOW EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION INSERT RECORD ID KSECTION 9 STANDARD CONTROL OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE 1 RECORD ID OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH = 7 DATA FIELD VALUES : .1440 100.0000 1.5000 OUTPUT OPTIONS IN EFFECT PEAK HYD VOL SUM STANDARD CONTROL OPERATION RESYOR STRUCTURE I RECORD ID INPUT HYDROGRAPH _ 1 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH : 6 DATA FIELD VALUES : 820.0000 .0000 .0000 OUTPUT OPTIONS IN EFFECT PEAK HYD ELEV VOL SUM STANDARD CONTROL OPERATION SAVMOV CROSS SECTION 9 RECORD ID INPUT HYDROGRAP3 : 6 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH = 1 DATA FIELD VALUES : .0000 .0000 .0000 OUTPUT OPTIONS IN EFFECT NONE _ STANDARD CONTROL OPERATION SAVMOV CROSS SECTION IC RECORD ID INPUT HYDROGRAPH = 1 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH = 2 DATA FIELD VALUES : .0000 .0000 .0000 OUTPUT OPTIONS IN EFFECT NONE EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION INCREM RECORD ID MAIN TIME INCREMENT : 1.00 HOURS EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMM RECORD ID FROM STRUCTURE I TO XSECTION 9 STARTING TIME = .00 RAIN DEPTH : 7.20 RAIN DURATION 240.00 RAIN TABLE NO.: 7 ANT. MOIST. COND: 2 ALTERNATE NO.: 1 STORM NO.: 4 MAIN TIME INCREMENT : 1.00 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE 1 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPE: 7 AREA: .14 SQ MI INPUT RUNOFF CURVE: 12. TIME OF CONCENTRATION= 1.50 aOURS COMPUTED CURVE NO. :100. INTERNAL EYDROGRAPH TIME INCREMENT= .2000 HOURS PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARCE(CFS) PEAK ELEYATION(FEET) 95.50 13.11 (RUNOFF) 233.51 1.11 (RUNOFF) TIME(HRS) FIRST 3YDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT : 1.00 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .i4 ,IO.MI. .00 DISCHG .00 .50 .99 1.09 1.11 1.11 1.13 1.14 1.14 1.14 10.00 DISCHG 1.14 1.15 [.17 1.17 1.17 1.18 1.20 1.21 1.21 1.21 20.00 DISCEG 1.23 1.27 1.13 1.23 1.23 1.33 1.37 1.38 1.38 1.38 30. 0 DISCaC 1.44 1.47 1.47 1.48 1.48 1.55 1.57 1.57 1.57 1.59 40.00 DISCHG 1.65 1.57 1.67 1.67 1.10 1.15 1.11 1.77 [.77 1.31 50.00 DISCHG 1.86 1.86 1.37 1.31 1.92 1.96 1.96 1.96 1.98 2.10 •-- 60.00 DISCHG 2.15 2.16 2.16 2.10 2.38 2.43 2.44 2.44 2.56 2.79 10.00 DISCHG 2.84 2.85 2.36 3.14 3.41 3.47 3.48 3.54 5.53 6.69 80.00 DISCHG 6.91 6.96 7.31 10.90 [2.22 12.48 12.53 12.58 12.76 12.30 90.00 DISCHG 12.81 12.31 12.36 12.93 12.95 12.95 12.95 [1.70 10.47 10.22 100.00 DISCHG 10.13 10.08 6.64 4.65 4.26 4.19 4.15 3.88 3.78 3.16 110.00 DISCHG 3.76 3.69 3.43 3.36 3.35 3.34 3.22 2.99 2.94 2.93 120.00 DISCEG 2.92 2.80 2.63 2.65 2.65 2.64 2.56 2.52 2.51 2.51 130.00 DISCHG 2.50 2.41 2.38 2.37 2.31 2.35 2.26 2.23 2.23 2.23 140.00 DISCHG 2.19 2.11 2.09 2.09 2.09 2.05 2.00 1.99 1.99 [.99 - 150.00 DISCHG 1.94 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.90 1.86 1.84 [.84 1.34 1.33 160.00 DISCHG 1.78 1.17 1.77 [.77 1.15 1.11 1.10 1.10 1.70 1.67 110.00 DISCHG 1.64 1.63 1.63 1.63 1.59 1.57 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.52 180.00 DISCHG 1.51 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.46 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.44 1.41 190.00 DISCHG 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.39 1.31 1.37 [.31 [.36 1.35 1.34 200.00 DISCHG [.34 [.34 1.34 1.32 1.31 1.31 1.31 1.30 [.29 1.28 210.00 DISCEG 1.28 1.28 1.27 1.26 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.24 1.23 1.23 220.00 DISCHG 1.23 1.23 1.21 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.19 1.18 1.18 230.00 DISCHG 1.18 1.18 1.11 1.17 1.11 1.11 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.11 - 240.00 DISCHG [.17 .64 .13 .02 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW : 1.20 WATERSHED INCHES, 668.89 CFS-ERS, 55.28 ACRE-FEET; 8ASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION RESVOR STRUCTURE I INPUT HYDROGRAPH: 1 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: 6 SURFACE ELEVATION: 820.00 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAL ELEYATION(FEET) 96.98 11.76 824.63 TR20 XEQ 03-26-91 09:34 NR'ENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION IYR-24HR 10 YR-24 HR 100 YR-24HR 100 TR-SMOW MELT 100 YEAR-10 DAY PAGE 1 TIME(HIS) FIRST HYDROCRAPH POINT : .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = 1.00 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .14 SQ.MI. .00 DISCHC .00 .13 .44 .15 .93 1.02 1.07 1.11 1.12 1.13 .00 ELEV 820.00 820.02 820.08 820.14 820.11 .320.19 820.20 820.20 820.21 820.21 --- 10.00 DISCHG 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.16 1.17 1.11 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 10.00 ELEV 820.21 820.21 820.21 820.21 820.21 820.21 820.22 820.22 820.22 820.22 20.00 DISCHG 1.21 1.23 1.25 1.21 1.21 1.29 1.32 1.35 1.36 1.31 20.00 ELEY 820.22 820.23 820.23 820.23 820.23 820.24 820.24 820.25 820.25 820.25 30.00 DISCHG 1.39 1.42 1.45 1.46 1.47 1.49 1.53 1.55 1.56 1.57 30.00 ELEY 820.25 820.26 820.26 820.21 820.21 820.27 820.28 820.28 820.29 820.29 40.00 DISCHG 1.60 1.63 1.65 1.66 1.67 1.70 1.73 1.75 1.76 1.78 40.00 ELEY 820.29 820.30 820.30 820.30 820.31 820.31 820.32 820.32 820.32 820.32 50.00 DISCHG 1.31 1.83 1.85 1.86 1.88 1.91 1.93 1.95 1.96 2.00 50.00 ELEY 820.33 820.34 820.34 820.34 820.34 820.35 820.35 820.36 820.36 820.31 60.00 DISCHG 2.06 2.11 2.13 2.16 2.23 2.32 2.31 2.41 2.45 2.51 60.00 ELEV 820.38 820.39 820.39 820.39 820.41 820.42 820.43 820.44 820.45 820.47 10.00 DISCHG 2.70 2.71 2.31 2.91 3.10 3.27 3.38 3.44 4.00 5.08 70.00 !LEV 820.49 820.51 820.51 820.53 820.57 820.60 820.62 820.63 820.73 820.13 80.00 DISCHG 5.63 5.96 6.22 6.86 1.36 3.55 9.17 3.64 10.00 10.33 80.00 ELEV 321.09 821.22 821.33 821.61 822.06 822.47 822.32 823.11 823.36 823.58 90.00 DISCHG 10.62 10.38 'ii.08 11.25 11.42 11.56 11.70 11.16 11.69 11.56 90.00 ELEY 823.78 823.96 824.11 824.24 824.37 824.43 824.58 824.63 824.58 824.48 100.00 DISCHC I1.43 11.31 11.03 10.41 9.10 8.92 8.19 7.45 6.65 6.01 100.00 ELEY 824.38 824.28 824.07 823.64 823.15 822.68 822.25 821.87 821.52 821.24 110.00 DISCHG 5.51 4.65 4.09 3.74 3.54 3.44 3.36 3.23 3.09 3.01 110.00 ELEY 821.02 820.85 820.75 820.68 820.05 820.63 820.e! 820.59 820.57 820.55 120.00 DISCHG 2.97 2.91 2.32 2.74 2.70 2.67 2.64 2.59 2.55 2.53 120.00 ELEY 820.54 820.53 820.52 820.50 320.44 820.49 820.48 820.47 820.47 820.46 130.00 DISCHC 2.52 2.48 2.44 2.40 2.39 2.31 2.34 2.29 2.26 2.24 130.00 ELEV 820.46 320.45 820.45 820.45 320.44 320.43 820.43 820.42 820.41 320.41 140.00 DISCEG 2.23 2.19 2.14 2.12 2.10 2.08 2.05 2.03 2.01 2.00 140.00 ELEY 820.41 320.40 820.39 820.39 820.38 820.38 820.38 820.31 820.37 820.37 150.00 DISCHG 1.98 1.96 1.93 1.92 1.91 1.90 1.37 1.36 1.85 1.34 150.20 ELEY 820.36 320.36 820.35 820.35 820.35 820.35 820.34 820.34 820.24 820.34 160.00 DISCHG 1.82 1.30 1.18 1.73 1.77 1.75 1.13 1.71 1.71 1.69 160.00 ELEV 820.33 820.33 820.33 820.32 820.32 820.32 820.32 820.31 820.31 820.31 170.00 DISCEG 1.67 1.65 1.64 1.64 1.62 1.60 1.58 1.57 1.56 1.55 170.00 ELEV 820.3! 820.30 820.30 820.30 820.30 820.29 820.29 820.29 820.29 820.28 180.00 DISCHG 1.53 1.52 1.51 1.51 1.49 1.47 1.46 1.45 1.45 1.44 180.00 ELEY 820.28 820.28 820.28 820.23 820.27 820.27 820.27 820.21 820.26 820.26 190.00 DISCHG 1.42 1.42 1.41 1.40 1.39 1.38 1.37 1.31 1.36 1.35 190.00 ELEY 820.26 820.26 820.26 820.25 820.25 820.25 820.25 820.25 320.25 820.25 200.00 DISCHG 1.35 1.34 1.34 1.33 1.32 1.32 1.31 1.31 1.30 1.29 200.00 80 820.25 820.25 820.24 820.24 820.24 820.24 820.24 820.24 320.24 820.24 210.00 DISCHG 1.29 1.28 1.23 1.27 1.26 1.26 1.26 1.25 i.24 1.24 210.00 ELEY 820.24 820.23 820.23 320.23 320.23 320.23 820.23 320.23 820.23 820.23 220.00 DISCEG 1.23 1.23 1.22 1.2I 1.21 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.19 1.19 220.00 ELEY 820.22 820.22 820.22 820.22 820.22 820.22 820.22 820.22 820.22 820.22 230.00 DISCHG 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.11 1.17 1.17 1.11 1.17 1.17 230.00 ELEV 820.22 820.22 820.22 820.22 820.21 820.21 820.21 820.21 820.21 820.21 240.00 DISCEG 1.11 1.04 .10 .38 .19 .10 .05 .02 .01 .01 240.00 ELl7 820.21 320.19 820.13 320.07 820.04 820.02 820.01 820.00 820.00 820.00 250.00 DISCHG .00 250.00 ELEV 820.00 R00FP VOLUME ABOVE iASEFLOW = 7.19 WATERSHED INCHES, 663.41 CFS-311S, 55.24 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW : .00 CPS OPERATION SAM CROSS SECTION 9 INPUT HYDROGRAPH: 6 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: 1 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCNP RECORD ID COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR ?ASS 4 OCHANGES TO STANDARD CONTROL LIST FOLLOW EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION INSERT RECORD ID + XSECTION 9 STANDARD CONTROL OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE 1 RECORD ID OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH = 1 DATA FIELD VALUES = .1440 54.0000 1.5000 OUTPUT OPTIONS IN EFFECT PEA' HYD VOL SUN STANDARD CONTROL OPERATION RESYOR STRUCTURE I RECORD ID INPUT HYDROGRAPH = l OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH : 6 DATA FIELD VALUES = 820.0000 .0000 .0000 OUTPUT OPTIONS IN EFFECT PEAL HYD ELEY VOL SUN TR20 XEQ 03-26-91 09:34 MCKENNA SAND R GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION 1YR-248R 10 YR-24 ER 100 YR-2411 100 YR-SNOW MELT 100 YEAR-IO DAY PAGE 8 STANDARD CONTROL OPERATION SAVMOV CROSS SECTION 9 RECORD ID INPUT HYDROGRAPH : 1 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH : 2 DATA FIELD VALUES : . .0000 .0000 .0000 OUTPUT OPTIONS IN EFFECT NONE - EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION INCREM RECORD ID MAIN TIME INCREMENT : 1.00 HOURS EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT RECORD ID PROM STRUCTURE I TO %SECTION 9 STARTING TIME : .00 RAIN DEPTH : 10.96 RAIN DURATION: 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO.: 9 ANT. MOIST. COND: 2 ALTERNATE NO.: 1 STORM NO.: 5 MAIN TIME INCREMENT : 1.00 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE I OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: 7 AREA: .14 SQ MI INPUT RUNOFF CURVE= 72. TINE OF CONCENTRATION= 1.50 HOURS INTERNAL HYDROGRAPH TIME INCREMENT: .2000 HOURS PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAT DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 119.96 51.19 (RUNOFF) TIME(SRS) FIRST 3YDRCGRAFH ?OINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT : 1.00 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .14 SQ.MI. +0.00 DISCEG .02 .04 .01 .09 .12 .14 .17 .20 .22 .25 50.00 DISCEG 28 .30 .33 .36 .39 .41 .44 .47 .50 .53 60.00 DISCEG .56 .54 .62 .65 .69 .12 .15 .19 .82 .86 70.00 DISCEG .39 .93 .16 1.00 1.04 1.08 1.13 1.16 1.21 1.25 80.00 DISCEG 1.29 1.35 1.38 1.45 1.49 1.55 1.61 [.65 1.73 1.17 90.00 DISCEG 1.86 92 - 1.99 2.03 2.13 2.24 .31 2.42 2.52 2.60 100.00 DISCEG 2.75 2.33 3.01 3.13 3.28 3.50 3.61 3.92 4.01 4.40 110.00 DISCHG 4.12 4.97 5.59 5.84 6.81 7.42 3.62 10.63 13.65 34.69 120.00 DISCEG 51.11 37.70 21.44 11.55 12.44 11.08 9.39 3.51 7.94 7.14 - 130.00 DISCEG 6.93 6.31 6.10 5.77 5.49 5.36 5.04 4.95 4.772 4.59 140.00 DISCEG 4.47 4.30 4.25 4.01 4.01 3.90 3.80 3.75 3.63 3.59 - 150.00 DISCEG 3.49 3.43 3.38 3.30 3.27 3.19 3.15 3.10 3.04 3.02 160.00 DISCEG 2.95 2.93 2.81 2.83 2.80 2.15 2.14 2.68 2.66 2.63 110.00 DISCEG 2.59 2.58 2.53 2.52 2.48 2.46 2.43 2.40 2.39 2.35 130.00 O[SCHG 2.34 2.3I 2.29 2.28 2.24 2.24 2.21 2.19 2.17 2.15 190.00 DISCEG 2.14 2.11 2.10 2.08 2.01 2.06 2.03 2.02 1.94 1.98 - 200.00 DISCEG 1.96 1.74 1.94 1.91 1.90 1.88 1.81 1.86 1.83 1.33 210.00 DISCEG 1.300 1.14 1.78 1.76 1.15 1.72 1.71 1.70 1.68 1.57 220.00 DISCHG 1.64 1.64 1.61 1.60 I.54 1.57 I.56 1.53 1.52 1.51 230.00 DISCEG 1.49 1.48 1.45 1.43 .62 .15 .05 .01 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME AaOVE BASEFLOW : 7.23 WATERSHED INCHES, 671.94 CPS-HRS, 55.53 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW : .00 CFS OPERATION RESVOR STRUCTURE 1 INPUT HYDROGRAPH: 7 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: 6 SURFACE ELEVATION: 820.00 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARRGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 120.79 48.54 825.56 TIME(HRS) FIRST 3YDROGRAPE 7OIsT : .00 SOURS TIKE INCREMENT : 1.00 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .14 3Q.NI. 40.00 DISCHC .00 .02 .04 .06 .08 .11 .13 .16 .18 .21 - 40.00 ?LEY 820.00 820.00 820.01 820.01 820.02 820.02 820.02 320.03 820.03 820.04 50.00 DISCEG .24 .26 .29 .32 .35 .37 .40 .43 .46 .49 50.00 ELEY 820.04 320.05 820.05 820.06 820.06 820.01 820.07 820.08 820.08 820.09 60.00 DISCHG .52 .55 .58 .61 .64 .67 .70 .74 .71 .81 60.00 ELEV 820.09 820.10 820.11 820.11 820,12 820.12 820.13 820.13 820.14 820.15 10.00 DISCEG .84 .81 .4I .95 .99 1.02 1.06 1.10 [.14 1.19 70.00 KM 820.15 820.16 820.17 820.17 820.18 820.19 820.19 820.20 820.21 820.22 80.00 DISCEG 1.23 1.28 1.32 1.37 1.42 1.41 1.53 1.58 1.64 1.10 80.00 ELEY 820.23 820.23 820.24 820.25 820.26 820.21 820.28 820.29 820.30 820.31 - 40.00 DISCHG 1.76 1.92 1.84 1.96 2.03 2.11 2.20 2.28 2.38 2.41 90.00 ELEY 820.32 820.33 820.35 820.36 820.37 820.39 820.40 820.42 820.43 820.45 100.00 DISCEG 2.58 2.69 2.81 2.94 3.08 3.24 3.40 3.58 3.79 4.02 100.00 ELEY 320.41 820.49 820.51 820.54 820.56 820.59 820.62 820.66 820.64 820.13 110.00 DISCEG 4.29 4.57 4.44 5.33 5.63 5.96 6.42 7.13 8.10 10.62 110.00 ELEY 820.19 820.84 820.90 820.98 821.07 821.22 821.42 821.73 822.20 823.18 120.00 DISCEG 31.63 41.68 21.31 19.07 13.12 12.29 12.10 11.80 11.46 11.08 120.00 ELEV 825.42 825.54 825.21 825.18 825.11 825.04 824.89 824.66 824.40 824.11 130.00 DISCEG 10.63 10.16 9.69 9.17 8.62 8.13 7.64 7.05 6.56 6.14 - 130.00 ELEV 823.79 823.46 323.14 822.82 822.51 822.22 821.95 821.69 821.48 821.29 T120 !EQ 03-26-91 09:34 McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION IYR-24H1 10 Y1-24 31 100 YR-24HR 100 YR-SNOW KELT 100 YEAR-10 DAY PACE 9 140.00 DISCEG 5.18 5.47 4.86 4.50 4.21 4.11 3.91 3.87 3.78 3.69 140.00 ELEY 821.14 321.00 820.39 820.32 820.78 820.75 820.13 820.71 820.69 820.68 150.00 DISCHG 3.62 3.54 3.41 3.40 3.34 3.29 3.23 3.11 3.12 3.07 150.00 ELEY 820.66 820.65 820.63 820.52 820.61 820.60 820.59 820.58 820.57 820.56 - 160.00 DISCHG 3.03 2.98 2.54 2.39 2.36 2.82 2.13 2.14 2.71 2.68 160.00 ELEY 820.55 320.55 820.54 820.53 820.52 820.51 820.51 820.50 820.50 820.49 170.00 DISCHG 2.64 2.61 2.58 2.55 2.53 2.50 2.41 2.44 2.42 2.40 170.00 ELEV 820.43 820.48 820.41 820.41 820.46 820.46 820.45 820.45 820.44 820.44 180.00 DISCEG 2.31 2.35 2.32 2.30 2.28 2.26 2.24 2.22 2.20 2.18 130.00 ELEV 820.43 320.43 820.42 820.42 820.42 820.41 820.41 820.41 820.40 820.40 190.00 DISCEG 2.16 2.14 2.13 2.11 2.09 2.08 2.06 2.04 2.02 2.00 190.00 ELEV 820.40 820.39 820.39 820.39 820.38 820.38 820.38 820.37 820.31 820.37 200.00 DISCEG 1.39 1.97 1.96 1.94 1.92 1.91 1.39 1.88 1.86 1.85 200.00 ELEV 820.36 820.36 320.36 820.35 820.35 820.35 820.35 820.34 820.34 820.34 210.00 DISCHC 1.83 1.81 1.80 1.18 1.77 1.15 1.14 1.12 1.70 1.69 210.00 ELEY 820.33 820.33 820.33 820.33 820.32 820.32 820.32 820.31 820.31 820.32 220.00 DISCHG 1.a1 1.46 1.64 1.62 1.61 1.59 1.58 1.56 1.55 1.53 220.00 ELEY 820.31 920.30 820.30 820.30 820.29 320.29 820.29 820.29 320.28 320.28 230.00 DISCHG 1.51 1.50 1.48 1.46 1.24 .80 .44 .23 .12 .06 230.00 ELEV 320.8 820.2? 820.21 820.27 820.13 820.15 820.08 820.04 820.02 820.01 240.00 DISCHG .03 .01 .01 .00 240.00 ELEY 820.01 820.00 820.00 820.0 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE 3ASEFLOW = 7.23 WATERSHED INCHES, 671.91 CFS-HIS, 55.53 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOH = .00 CFS OPERATION SAVMOY CROSS SECTION 9 INPUT HYDROGRAPE: 6 OUT IT HYDROGRA EE 1 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDC;.P RECORD ID + COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED ?OR PASS S EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION SNDJOB RECORD ID SUMMARY TABLE I - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(') AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TO? BYDROGRAPH - A QUESTION MARI(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAM 'LITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION! STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME RUNOFF ID OPERATION AREA. # COND INC.Th BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE - (SQ MI (ER) (Ha) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CPS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM . STRUCTURE 1 RUNE? .i0 .0 2.40 24.00 .48 --- 13.03 13.60 44.4 - STRUCTURE i RESYOR 2 2 .10 .0 2.40 24.00 .43 821.42 14.33 6.42 44.6 ALTERNATE i STORM 2 a - STRUCTURE 1 RUNOFF .14 2 .10 .0 4.20 24.00 1.60 --- 12.92 55.26 383.: STRUCTURE I RESYOR .14 2 2 .10 .0 4.20 24.00 1.60 825.29 13.92 27.37 193.5 ALTERNATE I STORM 3 STRUCTURE i RUNOFF .14 2 1 .10 .0 6.00 24.00 2.99 --- 12.39 101.46 746.2 STRUCTURE i RESVOR .1 2 2 .10 .0 6.00 24.00 2.:8 326.10 13.24 43.36 651.8 ALTERNATE 1 STORM 4 - STRUCTURE ' RUNOFF .14 7 2 1.00 .0 1.20 240.00 7.20 --- 95.50 13.11 91.0 STRUCTURE 1 RESYOR .14 7 2 1.00 .0 7.20 240.00 1.19 824.63 96.98 11.16 31.6 ALTERNATE 1 STORM 5 - STRUCTURE I RUNOFF .14 9 2 1.00 .0 10.80 235.20 7.23 --- 119.96 51.19 355.5 STRUCTURE 1 RESYOR .14 9 2 1.00 .0 10.30 235.20 7.23 825.56 120.18 48.59 337.4 SUMMARY TABLE 3 - DISCHARGE (CFS) AT XSECTIONS AND STRUCTURES ?OR ALL STORMS AND ALTERNATES !SECTION/ DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AREA STORM NUMBERS ID (SQ MI) 1 2 3 4 S 0 STRUCTURE 1 .14 ALTERNATE 1 6.42 27.31 93.36 11.76 48.59 - 1END OP 1 JOBS IN THIS RUN TR20 XEQ 03-26-91 10:35 MCXENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION 1YR-248R 10 YR-24 3R 100 YR-244R 100 YR-SMOW MELT [00 YEAR-10 DAY PACE 1 FIT SITE - ttttttttttt**::-30-30 LIST OP INPUT DATA FOR TR-20 HYDROLOCY"ttttttttttttt:tt J 8 TR-20FULL?TINT SUMMARY T TLZ 001 McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION PIT SITE 1Y1-24ER ?IT T TLE 10 YR-24 8R 100 YR-2481 100 YR-SMOi1 MELT 100 YEAR-10 DAY STRUCT 01 820.0 0.0 0. 321.0 5.47 0.66 322.0 7.15 1.413 823.0 9.48 2.265 824.0 10.94 3.222 325.0 12.24 4.291 825.1 12.36 4.404 826.0 83.98 5.454 826.11 95.39 5.62 327.0 180. 6.189 9 3NDTY., RAINPL 7 1 .0200 .000 .0080 .0162 .0246 .0333 .0625 .0524 .0630 .0743 .0863 .0972 .1124 .1265 .1420 .1595 .1800 .2050 .2550 .3450 .4310 .5300 .6030 .6330 .6600 .6840 .7050 .1240 .1420 .7590 .7750 .7960 .8043 .8180 .3312 .8439 .8501 .3678 .8190 .8898 .9002 .9103 .9201 .9291 .9391 .9483 - 9571 .966: .9147 .9832 .9916 1.0000 I.0000 Lou 1.0000 ENDTL 1AlNFL 9 2.4 3 .0 .00402 .00307 .01221 .01638 3 .02489 .02923 .03363 .038I0 .0123 .04723 .05191 .05666 .06149 3 .0:a- .0714 .07649 .08167 .08695 . 8 .092:= .09184 .10345 .10913 .11505 - 8 .11'0; .12720 .13351 .13999 .14665 8 .1535: .16058 .16788 .17543 .18326 .19985 .20871 .21799 .22176 8 .23809 .24408 .26086 .27359 .28751 8 3• 0247 .32053 .34118 36691 .40388 3 .56388 .61470 .64414 .66758 .68652 3 .i0494 .71758 .13087 .14310 .15441 8 ;76512 .77516 .78468 .19374 .8024 8 .81 .81368 .82637 .83379 .34091 8 .8674i .35469 .86126 .36765 .87388 8 .87496 .88589 .89169 .89736 .90291 8 • .90835 .91368 .9189 .924 .929 3 .9339 .1387 .9434 .948 .9525 8 .9569 .9612 .9654 .9695 .9735 8 .977; .9812 .9849 .985 .985 9 ENDTEL 6 RUNOFF 1 01 1 .057 73. .80 II 1 1 6 RESVOR 11 '11 7 6 820.0 11 1 I 1 - 6 SAVMOV 5 009 5 + 6SAVMOV5010 ! 2 ENDATA 1 INCREM 6 .10 1 COMPUT 1 01 009 2.40 1.0 2 2 01 01 ENDCMP I 1 COMPUT 7 01 009 4.20 1.0 2 2 01 02 ENDCMP 1 1 COMPUT 7 01 0009 6.00 1.0 2 2 01 03 ENDCMP I 7 INSERT 2 009 6 RUNOFF I 01 7 .057 100. .80 1 I II 6 RESVOR 2 Oi 7 6 820.0 1 1 1 1 1 6 SAVMOV 5 009 6 1 - 6 SAVMOV 5 010 1 2 ENDATA 1 INCREM 6 1.0 7 COMPUT 7 01 009 1.2 240. 7 2 01 04 ENDCMP I 7 INSERT 2 009 6 RUNOFF 1 01 7 .051 56. .80 1 1 1 I 6 RESVOR 2 01 7 6 820.0 [ ! 1 ! I 6 SAVMOV 5 009 I 2 • TR20 XEQ 03-26-91 10:35 McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION 1YR-24HR 10 YR-24 ER 100 YR-24H1 100 YR-SMOW MELT 100 YEAR-10 DAY PAGE 2 ENDATA 7 INCREM 6 1.0 1 COMPUT 7 01 009 10.96 1.0 9 2 01 05 ENDCMP 1 ENDJ08 2 '- Ottzszzrt:zszttttttlttrzzzrzzrs*END +:F 80-30 LIS':srrs:tr:ttttrtrrrrttrrttttrttrrt EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION INCREN RECORD ID + MAIN TIME INCREMENT : .10 SOURS • - EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT RECORD ID + FROM STRUCTURE I + TO XSECTION 9 - STARTING TIME : .00 RAIN DEPTH : 2.40 RAIN DURATION: 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO.: 2 ANT. MOIST. COND: 2 ALTERNATE NO.: 1 STORM NO.: 1 MAIN TIME INCREMENT : .10 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE 1 OUTPUT HYDROGRAEH= 1 AREA= .06 SQ MI INPUT RUNOFF CURVE= 73. TIME OF CONCENTRATION= .80 HOURS INTERNAL HYDROGRAFE TIME INCREMENT: .1061 HOURS PEAL TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEA! ELEVATION(FEET) 12.46 9.24 (RUNOFF) TINE(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPE POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT : .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .06 50.31. - 1 1.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .04 .23 .84 12.1;0 D1SCEG 2.12 4.09 6.02 8.16 1.11 9.: 3.53 7.53 6.52 5.69 13.00 DISCHG 5.03 4.48 4.01 3.62 3.29 3. 1 2.76 2.56 2.38 2.22 14.00 DISCHG 2.08 1.96 1.56 1.76 1.67 1.59 1.52 I.45 1.39 1.34 15.00 DISCHG 1.29 1.24 1.21 1.19 1.16 1.14 1.12 1.01 1.07 1.05 - 16.00 DISCEG 1.03 1.02101 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.1)0 .99 .98 .96 17.00 DISCHG .94 .91 .90 .83 .E7 .87 .86 .86 .36 .85 18.00 DISCHG .34 .32 .30 .78 .76 .74 .73 .72 .71 .71 19.00 DISCHG .70 .70 .70 .70 .70 7') .70 .70 .70 .10 - 20.00 DISCSG .69 .67 .65 .62 .60 .58 .57 .56 .55 .55 21.00 DISCHG .55 .54 .54 .54 .54 .54 .54 .54 .54 .54 22.00 DISCHG .54 .54 .54 .54 .54 .54 .54 .54 .54 .55 23.00 DISCEG .55 .55 .55 .55 .55 .5S .55 .55 .55 .54 •• 24.00 DISCHG .53 .5I .47 .41 .34 .27 .21 .16 .11 .03 - 25.00 DISCEG .06 .05 .03 .02 .02 .01 .01 .01 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE IASEPLOW = .51 IATERS03D :NOES, 18.91 CPS-ERS, 1.56 ACRE-FEET; EASEF_Oi : .00 CPS OPERATION RESYOR STRUCTURE 1 INPUT HYDROGRAP3= 1 OUTPUT 3YDROGRAPH= 6 SURFACE ELEVATION= 820.00 PEA! TIME(HRS) PEA! 3ISCEA GE(CFS) PEA! ELEYATION(FEET) 13.30 3.65 820.67 TIME(HRS) FIRST 3YDROGRAPH POINT : .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .06 SQ.MI. - 11.0o DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 .04 11.00 ELEV 320.00 320.00 320.30 820.00 320.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 320.00 820.01 12.00 DISCHG .14 .34 .66 1.09 1.59 2.09 2.54 2.91 3.13 3.38 12.00 ELEY 320.03 320.06 820.12 320.20 820.29 820.38 820.;7 320.53 820.58 320.62 13.00 DISCHG 3.51 3.59 3.63 3.65 3.53 3.50 3.55 3.50 3.43 3.35 13.00 ELEV 320.64 820.66 820.56 820.67 820.66 820.66 820.55 820.64 820.63 820.61 14.00 DISCHG 3.21 3.19 3.11 3.02 2.93 2.85 2.76 2.68 2.59 2.51 14.00 ELEV 820.50 320.58 320.57 820.55 320.54 820.52 820.50 820.49 820.47 820.46 15.00 DISCHG 2.43 2.36 2.28 2.21 2.14 2.08 2.01 1.995 1.90 1.84 - 15.00 ELEY 820.44 820.43 820.42 820.40 820.39 820.38 820.37 320.36 820.35 820.34 16.00 DISCEG 1.19 1.74 1.69 1.64 1.60 1.56 1.52 1.49 1.45 1.42 16.00 ELEV 820.33 820.32 820.31 820.30 820.29 820.29 820.28 820.21 820.27 820.26 17.00 DISCHG 1.39 1.36 1.33 1.30 [.27 1.25 1.22 1.20 1.11 1.15 11.00 ELEY 820.25 820.25 820.24 820.24 820.23 820.23 820.22 820.22 820.21 820.21 - 18.00 DISCHG 1.13 1.11 1.09 1.01 1.05 1.03 1.01 .99 .91 .96 18.00 ELEV 820.21 820.20 820.20 820.20 820.19 820.19 820.19 820.19 820.18 820.17 19.00 DISCEG .94 .92 .91 .90 .88 .81 .86 .85 .84 .83 19.00 ELEY 820.11 820.17 820.11 820.16 820.16 820.16 820.16 320.16 820.15 820.15 - 20.00 DISCEG .32 .81 .80 .79 .78 .17 .75 .14 .13 .72 20.00 ELEV 820.15 820.15 820.15 820.14 820.14 820.14 820.14 820.14 320.13 820.13 21.00 DISCHG .11 .10 .69 .68 .67 .66 .65 .64 .64 .63 21.00 ELEV 320.13 820.13 820.13 820.12 820.12 820.12 520.12 320.12 820.12 820.12 22.00 DISCHG .62 .62 .61 .61 .60 .60 .60 .59 .59 .59 - 22.00 ELEV 820.11 820.11 820.11 820.11 820.11 820.11 820.11 820.11 820.11 820.11 TR20 XEQ 03-26-4I 10:35 McKENNA SAND i GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION ITR-268R 10 YR-24 HR 100 YL-24HR 100 YR-SMOW MELT 100 YEAR-I0 DAY PAGE 3 23.00 DISCSG .58 .58 .58 .58 .58 .57 .57 .57 .57 .57 23.00 ELS? 820.11 820.11 820.11 820.11 820.11 820.10 820.10 820.10 820.10 820.10 - 24.00 DISCHG .57 .56 .56 .55 .54 .52 .50 .48 .46 .44 24.00 ELEY 820.10 320.10 820.10 820.10 820.10 820.10 820.09 820.09 820.08 820.08 25.00 DISCEG .41 .39 .37 .34 .32 .30 .28 .26 .25 .23 25.00 ELEV 820.08 320.01 820.01 820.06 820.06 820.06 820.05 820.05 820.05 820.04 26.00 DISCSG .22 .20 .19 .18 .16 .15 .14 .13 .12 .12 26.00 ELEV 820.04 320.04 820.03 820.03 820.03 820.03 820.03 820.02 820.02 820.02 27.00 DISCEG AI I .10 .09 .09 .08 .08 .01 .07 .06 .06 21.00 BUY 820.02 820.02 820.02 820.02 820.02 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 28.00 DISCSG .05 .05 .05 .04 .04 .04 .04 .03 .03 .03 - 28.00 ELEV 320.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 29.00 DISCSG .03 .03 .02 .02 .02 .02 .02 .02 .02 .01 29.00 ELEV 820.01 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE 3ASEFLOA : .51 WATERSHED INCHES, 18.89 CFS-ERS, 1.56 ACRE-FEET; BASEPLOW : .00 CFS OPERATION SAYMO7 CROSS SECTION 9 INPUT HYDROGRAPH: 6 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: 1 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDC!P RECORD ID COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR ?ASS I - EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT RECORD ID ?ROM STRUCTURE I 70 XSECTION 9 STARTING TINE : .00 7!iN DEPTH : 4.20 RAIN DURATION: 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO.: 2 ANT. MOIST. COND. 2 - ALTERNATE NO.: i I701M 30.: 2 MAIN TIME INCREMENT : .10 HOURS 1P?RATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE I OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: 7 AREA: .06 SQ MI BHT RUNOFF CURVE: 73. TIME OF CONCENTRATION: .80 HOURS INTERNAL HYDROGRAP3 TIME INCREMENT: .1057 HOURS PEAK ?IME(HRS) PEAK DISCEARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.40 35.30 (RUNOFF '. 23.66 1.35 RUNOFF, • TINE(NRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPE ?OINT : .00 HOURS TINE INCREMENT : .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .06 SQ.MI. 10.00 DISCSG .00 .00 .01 .02 .05 .08 .12 .18 .25 .34 - 11.00 DISCSG .44 .57 .72 .39 1.10 1.36 1.32 2.69 4.55 8.i4 12.00 DISCSG 13.53 21.46 28.53 34.12 35.30 34.40 30.37 26.35 22.07 18.77 13.010 DISCEG 16.18 14.08 12.36 10.94 9.11 8.79 7.98 7.29 6.7i 6.21 14.00 DISCEG 5.77 5.40 5.07 44.77 4.51 4.27 4.07 3.38 3.11 3.55 15.00 DISCEG 3..; 3.29 3.20 3.12 3.06 3.00 2.93 2.36 2.15 2.73 16.00 DISCEG 2.03. 05 2.62 2. 2.59 2.58 2.57 2.55 2.51 2.46 11.00 DISCNG 2.41 2.35 2.30 2.26 2.24 2.72 2.20 2.19 2.18 2.17 18.00 DISCNG 2.14 2.09 2.03 1.18 1.92 1.83 1.84 1.32 1.30 1.19 19.00 DISCEG 1.18 1.77 1.17 1.77 1.76 1.76 1.16 1.76 1.16 1.15 - 20.00 DISCSG 1.72 i.68 1.62 1.56 1.51 1.46 1.42 1.40 1.38 1.37 21.00 DISCSG 1.36 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 22.00 DISCEG 1.34 1.34 1.34 I.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.35 1.35 23.00 DISCNG 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.34 - 24.00 )ISCEG 1.31 1.25 1.15 1.01 .85 .67 .52 .38 .28 .21 25.00 DISCEG .15 .11 .03 .06 .04 .03 .02 .02 .01 .01 26.00 DISCHG .01 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE 3ASEFLOW : 1.67 WATERSHED INCHES, 61.41 CFS-HRS, 5.08 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW : .00 CPS OPERATION RESVOR STRUCTURE I INPUT AYDROGRAPH: 7 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: 6 SURFACE ELEVATION: 820.00 PEAR TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 13.48 8.98 822.71 TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH ?DINT : .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT : .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .06 SQ.MI. 10.00 DISCEG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 .01 .02 .03 .05 10.00 ELEV 820.00 320.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.01 820.01 11.00 DISCSG .07 .10 .14 .18 .24 .30 .39 .51 .72 1.09 11.00 ELEY 820.01 820.02 820.03 820.03 820.04 820.06 820.07 820.09 820.13 820.20 12.00 DISCEC 1.75 2.81 4.29 5.70 6.43 1.13 7.16 8.11 8.31 8.57 12.00 ELEV 820.32 820.5I 820.78 821.10 821.42 821.13 822.01 822.21 822.36 822.48 13.00 DISCHG 8.72 3.33 8.90 8.95 8.91 8.98 8.97 8.94 8.91 8.37 TR20 XEQ 03-26-91 10:35 McLENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION ITR-241R 10 YR-24 31 100 YR-241I 100 YR-SMON MELT 100 TEAR-10 DAT PAGE 4 13.00 ELEY 822.56 822.62 822.67 822.69 822.71 822.71 822.70 822.69 822.61 822.65 14.00 DISCHG 8.82 8.71 8.71 8.65 8.58 8.51 8.44 8.36 8.29 8.21 14.00 ELEY 822.62 822.59 822.56 822.52 822.48 822.44 822.40 822.36 822.31 822.27 15.00 DISCHG 3.13 8.05 1.91 7.89 1.31 . 7.13 7.61 1.49 7.38 1.26 15.00 ELEY 822.22 822.17 822.13 822.08 822.04 821.99 821.94 821.89 821.84 821.19 - 16.00 DISCEG 7.15 7.04 6.93 6.82 6.72 6.62 6.52 6.42 6.32 6.23 [6.00 ELZY 821.74 821.69 821.64 821.59 821.55 821.50 821.46 821.42 821.37 821.33 11.00 DISCHG 6.13 6.04 5.95 5.86 5.71 5.68 5.60 5.51 5.36 5.15 11.00 ELEV 821.29 821.25 821.21 821.11 821.13 821.09 821.06 821.02 820.98 820.94 _ 18.00 DISCBC 4.95 4.71 4.59 4.42 4.25 4.10 3.95 3.81 3.68 3.55 18.00 ELEY 820.91 820.87 820.34 820.81 820.78 820.75 820.12 820.10 820.61 820.65 19.00 DISCHG 3.43 3.32 3.22 3.12 3.03 2.95 2.81 2.80 2.13 2.67 19.00 ELEY 820.63 820.61 820.59 820.57 820.55 820.54 820.53 820.51 820,50 820.49 20.00 DISCHG 2.60 2.54 2.48 2.43 2.31 2.31 2.25 2.19 2.14 2.09 - 20.00 ELEY 820.48 820.47 820.45 820.44 820.43 820.42 820.41 820.40 820.39 820.38 21.00 DISCHG 2.04 2.00 1.95 1.91 1.88 1.84 1.81 1.18 1.75 1.12 21.00 ELEY 820.31 820.37 820.36 820.35 820.34 820.34 820.33 820.32 820.32 820.31 22.00 DISCHG 1.70 1.67 1.65 1.63 1.6i 1.59 1.58 1.56 1.55 1.53 _ 22.00 ELEV 820.31 820.31 820.30 820.30 820.29 820.29 820.29 820.29 820.28 820.28 23.00 DISCHG 1.52 1.51 1.50 1.49 1.48 1.41 1.46 I. 1..5 1.44 23.00 EU/ 820.28 820.28 820.27 820.27 820.27 820.27 820.21 820.27 820.26 820.26 24.00 DISCEG 1.43 1.42 1.4I 1.39 1.36 1.32 1.27 1.22 1.16 1.10 24.00 ELEV 820.26 820.26 820.26 820.25 820.25 820.24 820.23 820.22 820.21 820.20 - 25.00 DISCEG 1.04 .98 .92 .36 .31 .76 .71 .66 .52 .58 25.00 ELEV 820.19 820.18 820.17 820.16 820.15 820.14 820.13 820.12 820.11 820.11 26.00 DISCEG .54 .51 .47 .44 .41 .38 .36 .34 .31 .29 26.00 ELEY 820.10 820.09 320.09 820.08 820.08 820.07 820.07 820.06 820.06 820.05 - 27.00 DISCHG .27 .25 .24 .22 .19 .18 .17 .16 .15 21.00 ELEY 820.05 820.05 820.04 820.04 820.04 820.04 820.03 820.03 820.03 820.03 28.00 DISCHG .14 .13 .12 .11 .10 .10 .09 .09 .08 .07 28.00 ELEY 820.03 820.02 320.02 820.02 810.02 820.02 820.02 820.02 120.01 320.01 29.00 )ISCBG .07 .06 .06 .Ci .35 .05 .05 .04 .04 .04 - 29.00 ELY 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 820.01 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOV = 1.61 WATERSHED INCHES, ti.3i CFS-ERS, 5.03 ACRE-FEET; BASZFLC7 = .00 CFS OPERATION SAYMOV CROSS SECTION 9 INPUT HYDROGRAPH: S OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: I EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP RECORD 1D + COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED 712 ?ASS 2 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT RECORD ID - + FROM STRUCTURE I + TO XSECTION 9 STARTING TIME : .00 RAIN )EPTH : 6.00 RAIN DURAT10N 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO.= 2 ANT. MOIST. COND: 2 ALTERNATE NO.: 1 STORM NO.= 3 MAIN TIME LICHEN? = .10 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE 1 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH= 7 AREA: .06 SQ MI INPUT RUNOFF CURVE: 73. TIME F CONCENTRATION= .30 BURS INTERNAL HYDROGRAPH TIME INCREMENT= .1067 HOUR: PEAK TIME(ER,S') PEAK DISCHARGZ(CFS; PEAR ELEVATION(FEET) 12.39 68.37 (RUNOFF! 23.65 2.19 (RUNOFF) -- TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = 10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .06 4.11.8.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 .03 .05 .08 .11 9.00 DISCEG .15 .20 .25 .30 .36 .42 .49 .56 .63 .11 10.00 DISCHG .79 .88 .97 1.06 1.17 1.30 1.45 1.63 1.84 2.09 11.00 DISCEG 2.38 2.71 3.08 3.50 3.91 4.56 5.61 7.54 11.50 18.13 12.00 DISCHG 29.91 43.38 57.23 65.94 68.02 64.48 57.19 48.33 40.13 33.86 13.00 DISCHG 28.96 25.01 21.19 19.16 16.99 15.21 13.73 12.49 11.45 10.55 14.00 DISCHG 9.79 9.12 8.54 8.03 7.56 7.15 6.80 6.48 6.19 5.92 - 15.00 DISCHG 5.68 5.48 5.32 5.19 5.09 4.99 4.87 4.75 4.63 4.52 16.00 DISCEG 4.44 4.38 4.34 4.31 4.29 4.21 4.25 4.21 4.15 4.06 11.00 DISCHG 3.96 3.87 3.79 3.12 3.68 3.64 3.62 3.60 3.59 3.56 18.00 DISCHG 3.51 3.43 3.34 3.24 3.15 3.01 3.02 2.98 2.95 2.92 _ 19.00 DISCHG 2.91 2.90 2.89 2.89 2.88 2.88 2.88 2.88 2.87 2.85 20.00 DISCHG 2.31 2.73 2.64 2.54 2.45 2.38 2.32 2.28 2.25 2.23 21.00 DISCHG 2.21 2.20 2.19 2.19 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.18 22.00 DISCEG 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.18 23.00 DISCHG 2.18 2.18 2.19 2.19 2.19 2.19 2.19 2.19 2.13 2.16 - 24.00 DISCHG 2.12 2.02 1.87 1.64 1.31 1.09 .84 .62 .45 .33 - T120 XEQ 03-26-91 10:35 Nc[ENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION 1YR-2411 10 Y1-24 HR 100 YR-24HR 100 YR-SMOV MELT 100 YEAR-10 DAY PAGE 5 25.00 DISCHG .24 .18 .13 .10 .07 .05 .04 .03 .02 .01 26.00 DISCHG .01 .01 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLON : 3.09 WATERSHED INCHES, 113.50 CFS-HRS, 9.38 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOV : .00 CPS - OPERATION RESVOR STRUCTURE I INPUT HYDROGRAPH: 1 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPE: 6 SURFACE ELEVATION: 820.00 PEAK TINE(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEYATION(FEET) 13.12 12.36 825.10 TINE(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH ?DINT : .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT : .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .06 SQ.MI. 8.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Al .01 - 8.00 ELEV 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 820.00 9.00 DISCHG .02 .03 .04 .06 .08 .10 .12 .15 .18 .21 3.00 BLEU 820.00 820.01 320.01 820.01 320.01 820.02 820.02 820.03 820.03 820.04 10.00 DISCHG .25 .28 .33 .37 .42 .48 .53 .60 .68 .76 10.30 HEY 820.04 820.05 820.06 820.07 820.08 820.09 820.10 820.11 820.12 820.14 11.00 DISCHG .36 .97 1.10 1.24 1.41 1.60 1.83 2.14 2.53 3.46 11.00 !LEV 320.16 820.18 820.20 820.23 820.26 820.29 820.33 '820.39 820.48 820.63 12.00 DISCHG 4.84 6.03 1.13 8.24 9.2I 9.99 10.63 11.12 11.45 11.70 12.00 ELEV 320.33 821.24 821.73 822.28 822.85 823.35 823.19 824.13 824.39 824.59 - 13.00 DISCHG 11.30 12.05 12.16 12.25 12.30 12.33 12.35 12.36 12.35 12.14 13.00 ELEV 824.74 324.85 824.94 825. 0 825.05 825.07 825.09 825.10 825.09 825.03 14.00 DISCHG 12.32 12.30 12.21 12.23 12.19 12.14 12.09 12.03 11.91 11.91 14.00 ELEV 825.07 825.05 825.02 824.99 824.96 824.92 824.38 824.84 824.30 324.75 15.00 DISCHG 11.85 11.19 11.13 11.66 11.60 11.53 11.41 1I.40 11.33 11.26 15.00 ELEV 824.70 824.65 824.61 824.56 824.51 824.45 824.40 824.35 824.30 824.25 16.00 DISCHG [1.20 11.13 11.06 10.94 10.92 10.54 10.76 10.68 10.59 10.51 16.00 ELEV 3224.20 324.14 324.09 824.04 323.99 823.93 823.31 823.32 823.16 823.71 17.00 DISCHG 10.43 10.35 10.21 10.19 10.10 10.02 9.94 9.86 9.19 9.11 - 17.00 ELEV 323.65 923.60 823.54 323.48 823.43 323.37 823.32 823.26 823.21 323.16 13.00 DISCHG 9.63 4.55 9.43 9.37 9.27 9.11 9.01 8.96 8.86 8.11 18.00 E127 823.10 823.05 823.00 822.9E 822.88 822.32 822.16 822.70 822.64 822.59 19.00 DISCHG 8.67 8.57 3.42 8.38 8.29 3.20 8.11 8.03 1.94 7.36 19.00 ELEV 822.53 822.48 822.42 822.37 322.31 822.26 322.21 822.16 822.11 822.06 20.00 DISCHG 1.17 1.66 1.54 7.42 7.29 1.11 1.05 6.94 6.32 6.71 20.00 ELEV 322.01 321.96 821.91 821.35 321.30 821.75 821.70 821.64 821.59 821.54 21.00 DISCHG 6.50 6.49 6.38 6.28 6.18 6.08 5.98 5.39 5.80 5.71 21.00 ELEV 821.49 321.45 821.40 821.36 321.31 821.27 821.23 82I.18 321.14 821.10 - 22.00 DISCHG 5.62 5.54 5.4i 5.21 5.01 4.32 4.65 4.48 4.33 4.19 22.00 3LEV 821.07 821.3 320.99 820.95 820.92 820.38 820.35 820.2 220.79 820.77 23.00 DISCEG 4.06 3.93 3.32 3.7 3.61 3.51 3.43 3.34 3.27 3.19 23.00 ELEV 320.74 820.74 320.70 820.6a 820.66 320.54 820.63 820.61 320.60 820.53 24.00 DISCHG 3.12 3.05 2.98 2.90 2.81 2.70 2.59 2.46 2.34 2.21 24.00 ELEY 320.57 320.56 320.55 820.533 320.54 820.49 820.47 320.45 820.43 820.30 25.00 DISCEG 2.08 1.16 1.34 1.72 1.62 1.51 1.41 1.32 1.24 1.16 25.00 E1E7 820.33 320.36 820.34 820:32 820.30 820.28 820.26 820.24 820.23 820.21 26.00 DISCHG 1.08 1.01 .94 .38 .82 .77 .72 .67 .62 .58 - 26.00 ELEV 820.20 820.18 820.11 820.16 820.15 820.14 820.13 820.12 820.11 820.11 21.00 DISCHG .54 .51 .48 .44 .41 .39 .36 .34 .31 .29 27.00 ELEV 320.10 820.09 320.09 820.03 320.08 820.07 820.07 820.06 820.06 820.05 28.00 DISCEG .27 .26 .24 .22 .21 .19 .18 .17 .16 .15 28.00 ELEV 820.05 820.05 820.04 320.04 320.04 820.04 320.03 820.03 820.03 820.03 29.00 DISCHG .14 .13 .12 .11 .11 .10 .09 .09 .08 .01 29.00 E1E7 520.03 820.02 820.02 820.02 320.02 820.02 320.02 820.0 820.01 320.01 RUNOFF VOLUME WYE 3ASEFLOW : 3.08 WATERSHED INCHES, 113.39 CPS-HRS, 9.37 ACRE-FEET; 81SEFLON : .00 CPS OPERATION SAVMOV CROSS SECTION 9 INPUT HYDROGRAPH: 6 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: I EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP RECORD I3 } COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 3 TR20 XEQ 03-26-91 10:35 McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION IY1-24HR PET JOB I ?ASS 4 REV ?C 09/83(.2) 10 YR-24 HR 100 YR-248R 100 YR-SMOX MELT 100 TEAR-10 DAY PAGE 8 OCHANGES TO STANDARD CONTROL LIST FOLLOW EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION INSERT RECORD ID XSECTION 9 TR20 IEQ 03-26-91 10:35 MCKENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION I4R-24HR IO YR-24 HR 100 11-24ER 100 YR-SMO11 MELT 100 YEAR-10 DAY PAGE 6 STANDARD CONTROL OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE I RECORD ID OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH : 1 DATA FIELD VALUES : .0570 100.0000 .3000 OUTPUT OPTIONS IN EFFECT PEAK HYD VOL SUN STANDARD CONTROL OPERATION RESYOR STRUCTURE 1 RECORD ID - INPUT EYDROGRAPfl : 1 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH : 6 DATA FIELD VALUES : 820.0000 .0000 .0000 OUTPUT OPTIONS IN EFFECT PEAK HYD ELEY VOL SUM STANDARD CONTROL OPERATION SAVMOV CROSS SECTION 9 RECORD ID INPUT HYDROGRAPH : 6 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH : 1 DATA FIELD VALUES : .0000 .0000 .0000 OUTPUT OPTIONS IN EFFECT NONE STANDARD CONTROL OPERATION SAVMOV CROSS SECTION 10 RECORD iD - INPUT HYDROGRAPH : 1 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH : 2 DATA FIELD VALUES : .0000 - .0000 .0000 OUTPUT OPTIONS IN EFFECT ION/ EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION INCREM RECORD ID + MAIN TIME INCREMENT : 1.00 FOURS EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT RECORD ID + FROM STRUCTURE I - + TO XSECTION 9 STARTING TIME : .00 RAIN DEPTH : 7.20 RAIN DURATION:240.00 .LAIN n318 NO.: 1 ANT. MOIST. COND: 2 ALTERNATE :10.: 1 STORM NO.: 4 MAIN TIME INCREMENT : 1.00 3OUIS OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: 7 AREA: .06 SQ MI INPUT RUNOFF CURVE: I3. TIME IF CONCENTRATION: .K HOURS COMPUTED CURVE NO. :100. INTERNAL 3YDROGRAPN TIME INCREMENT: .1067 HOURS PEAL TIME(IRS) PEAL DISCL.ARGE(CPS) PEAL ELEVATION(FEE'' 94.52 5.13 (RUNOFF) - TIME(ERS) FIRST IYDROGIAPE ?DINT : .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT : [.00 H0011 DRAINAGE AREA : .06 SQ.MI. .00 DISCEG .00 .38 .44 .44 .44 .44 .45 .45 .45 .45 10.00 DISCEG .45 .46 .46 .46 .46 .47 .48 .43 .43 .48 20.00 DISCEG .50 .51 .51 .51 .51 .54 `3 .55 .55 .55 - 30.00 Discs .58 .58 .58 .58 .59 .62 2 .62 .:i .64 40.00 DISCEG io .66 .:6 .66 .69 .10 .70 .70 .70 .13 50.00 DISCEG .74 .76 4 .74 .77 .71 .78 .30 6; 60.00 DISCEG 35 .35 .35 .91 .96 .96 .36 . 5 1.04 1.12 10.00 DISCEG 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.34 1.38 1.38 ..33 1.46 2.6o 2.13 - 30.00 DISCEG 2.16 2.76 3.34 4.38 4.96 'S 5.03 5.07 5.01 90.00 DISCEG 5.07 5.07 5.11 3.13 5.13 5.13 .13 4.:7 4.03 4.02 100.00 DISCEG 4.02 3.39 1.33 1.66 1.65 1.65 1.61 1.49 1.43 1.+4 110.00 DISCEG 1.49 1.40 1.33 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.20 1.16 1.16 Lis I20.00 DISCEG 1.16 1.06 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.04 1.00 .34 .54 .94 - 130.00 DISCEG .93 .94 .94 .94 .94 .31 .38 .38 .88 .88 140.00 DISCEG .34 .83 .83 .33 .33 .19 .79 .19 .79 .19 150.00 DISCRG .76 .76 .76 . .76 .75 .13 .73 .73 .73 .71 160.00 DISCEG .70 .70 .70 .70 .68 .67 .67 .67 .67 .65 - 110.00 DISCEG .65 .64 .64 .64 .62 .62 .62 .62 .61 .60 180.30 DISCRG .60 .60 .60 .58 .57 .51 .57 .57 .56 .56 110.00 DISCEG .56 .56 .50 .54 .34 .54 .34 .54 .53 .53 53 .52 .52 .52 .51 .51 2CO. G )ISC3G .53 .52 = --•210.00 DISCRG .51 .51 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .44 .44 .4; 220.00 DISCEG .49 .48 .47 .47 .47 .47 .41 .41 .47 .47 220.00 DISCEG .47 .41 .46 .46 .46 .46 .46 .46 .46 .46 240.00 DISCEG .46 .06 .00 - - RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLON : 7.20 IATERSHED INCHES, 264.78 CPS-ERS, 21.88 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOY = .00 CFS OPEERATION RESVOR STRUCTURE 1 - INPUT HYDROGRAPH: 7 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH: S . SURFACE ELEVATION: 820.00 PEAL TIME(ERS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAL ELEVATION(?EET) - 95.51 5.15 820.94 TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT : .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT : 1.00 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .06 SQ.MI. .00 DISCRG .00 .10 .26 .35 .40 .42 .43 .44 .45 .45 - .00 ELEV 820.00 820.02 820.05 320.06 820.07 320.08 820.38 820.08 820.08 820.08 [0.00 DISCEG .45 .46 .46 .46 .46 .46 .47 .48 .48 .43 - 1120 IEQ 03-26-91 10:35 Mc ENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION IYR-2411 10 Y1-24 HR 100 11-2411 100 YR-SMO1 MELT I00 YEAR-10 DAY PAGE 7 10.00 ELEY 820.08 820.08 820.08 820.08 820.08 820.08 820.09 820.09 820.09 820.09 20.00 DISCHC .48 .49 .50 .50 .51 .5I .53 .54 .54 .54 20.00 ELEY 820.09 820.09 820.09 820.09 820.09 820.09 820.10 820.10 820.10 820.10 30.00 DISCHG .55 .57 .58 .58 .59 .60 .61 .62 .62 .63 30.00 ELI? 820.10 820.10 820.11 820.11 820.11 820.11 820.11 820.11 820.11 820.11 40.00 DISCHC .64 .65 .66 .66 .67 .68 .69 .70 .70 .11 - 40.00 ELEY 820.12 820.12 820.12 820.12 820.12 820.12 820.13 820.13 820.13 820.13 50.00 DISCHC .72 .13 .73 .14 .75 .76 .11 .77 .18 .80 50.00 ELEY 820.13 820.13 820.13 820.13 820.14 820.14 320.14 820.14 820.14 820.15 60.00 DISCHC .33 .84 .85 .87 .90 .93 .95 .96 .99 1.05 - 60.00 ELE? 820.15 820.15 820.16 820.16 820.11 820.11 820.17 820.18 820.18 820.19 70.00 DISCHC 1.09 1.11 1.12 1.18 1.27 1.33 1.35 1.39 1.73 2.23 70.00 ELI? 320.20 820.20 820.20 820.22 820.23 820.24 820.25 820.25 320.32 820.41 80.00 DISCHG 2.50 2.63 2.84 3.49 4.22 4.60 4.78 4.89 4.91 5.02 80.00 ELEY 320.46 820.48 820.52 820.64 820.17 820.84 820.87 820.89 820.91 820.92 - 90.00 DISCHG 5.05 5.06 5.08 5.10 5.11 5.12 5.12 4.38 4.48 4.25 90.00 ELI? 820.92 820.93 820.93 820.93 820.93 820.94 820.94 820.39 820.32 820.78 100.00 DISCHG 4. 4 4.05 3.44 2.57 2.I1 1.88 1.75 1.65 1.57 1.53 100.00 ELI? 820.76 820.74 820.63 820.47 820.39 820.24 820.32 820.30 820.29 820.28 110.00 DISCHG 1.51 1.48 1.42 1.37 1.35 1.33 1.30 1.24 1.20 1.18 110.00 ELEY 820.28 820.27 820.26 820.25 820.25 820.24 320.24 820.23 ' 820.22 820.22 120.00 DISCHG 1.11 1.14 1.10 1.07 1.06 1.05 1.04 1.01 1.00 1.00 120.00 ELEY 320.21 820.2I 820.20 820.20 820.19 820.19 320.19 820;19 820.18 820.18 130.00 DISCRG .99 .91 .96 .95 .94 .93 .9I .90 .89 .89 - 130.00 ELI? 320.13 820.18 820.17 820.17 820.17 820.17 820.17 820.16 820.16 820.16 140.00 DISCHG .31 .35 .84 .83 .83 .32 .31 .80 .79 .79 140.00 ELEY 820.16 820.16 320.15 820.15 820.15 820.15 820.15 820.15 820.14 820.14 150.:0 DISCHG .78 .17 .16 .76 .75 .75 .74 .73 .73 .73 - 150.00 ELE7 320.14 820.14 820.14 820.14 820.14 820.14 320.13 820.13 820.13 820.13 160.00 DISCHG .72 .71 .70 .70 .70 .64 .68 .68 .67 .67 160.00 EL?V 820.13 320.13 820.13 820.13 820.13 820.13 820.12 820.12 320.12 820.12 170.00 Ji!CHG .66 .65 .65 .65 .64 .63 .62 .62 .62 .61 170.00 ELEV 820.12 320.12 820.12 820.12 820.12 820.11 320.1I 820.1i 820.11 820.11 - 180.00 DISCHG .60 .00 .60 .59 .59 .58 .58 .57 .57 .56 180.00 ELEY 320.11 820.11 320.11 820.11 820.11 820.11 320.11 820.11 320.:0 320.10 190.00 DISCHl .56 .55 .56 .55 .55 .54 .54 .54 54 .53 190.00 ELE7 820.10 820.10 820.10 820.10 820.10 820.10 820.10 820.10 820.10 820.10 200.00 DISCHG .53 .53 .53 .53 .52 .52 .52 .52 .51 .51 200.00 REV 320.10 820.10 820.10 820.10 820.10 320.10 320.09 820.09 820.09 820.09 210.00 DISCHG .51 .51 .51 .50 .50 .50 .50 .49 .49 .49 2.10.00 ELEY 820.09 820.09 320.09 320.09 820.09 820.09 820.09 320.09 820.05 820.09 220.00 3ISCEG ' .49 .49 .48 .48 .48 .48 .47 .41 .47 .47 - 220.00 ELEV 920.09 820.09 320.09 820.09 820.09 820.09 320.09 820.09 320.09 820.09 230.00 DISCRG .47 .47 .47 .46 .46 .46 .46 .46 .46 .46 230.00 ELI? 320.09 420.09 820.09 820.08 820.08 320.03 820.08 820.08 820.13 820.28 240.00 DISCHG .46 .36 .19 .10 .05 .02 .01 .01 .00 240.00 ELEY 820.08 820.31 820.04 820.02 820.01 323.10 820.00 820.00 820.00 RUNOFF VOLUME .tEOYE 3ASEFLC1 = 1.19 iATERSHED INCHES, 264.64 CFS-ERS, ,21.37 ACRE-FEET; 3ASEPLOV .10 '.FS -- OPERA'ION SAM CROSS SECTION 9 INPUT 3YDROCRAP8 6 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPE: ! _ EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP RECOED 10 COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED ?OR PASS 4 JCHANGES TO STANDARD CONTROL LIST FOLLOV EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION INSERT RECORD ID } !SECTION 9 STANDARD CONTROL OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE 1 RECORD ID OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH : 7 DATA FIELD VALUES : .0570 56.0000 .8000 OUTPUT OPTIONS IN EFFECT PEAL; HYD VOL SUM STANDARD CONTROL OPERATION RESYOR STRUCTURE 1 RECORD ID INPUT EYDROGRAPH = 7 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH : 6 DATA FIELD VALUES : 820.0000 .0000 .0000 OUTPUT OPTIONS IN EFFECT PEAL HYD ELEY VOL SUM STANDARD CONTROL OPERATION SAYMOY CROSS SECTION 9 RECORD ID INPUT HOLOGRAPH : 1 OUTPUT HYDROGLAPH : 2 DATA FIELD VALUES : .0000 .0000 .0000 OUTPUT OPTIONS IN EFFECT NONE TR20 XEQ 03-26-91 10:35 McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION IYR-2481 10 YR-24 3R 100 Y1-243R 100 '?R-SSMON MELT 100 YEAR-10 DAY PAGE 3 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION MEM RECORD ID - + MAIN TIME INCREMENT : 1.00 BURS EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT RECORD ID - + FROM STRUCTURE 1 + TO 'SECTION 9 STARTING TIME = .00 RAIN DEPTH : 10.96 RAIN DURATION: 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO.: 9 ANT. MOIST. COND: 2 ALTERNATE NO.: 1 STORM NO.: S MAIN TIME INCREMENT : 1.00 HOURS - OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE 1 OUTPUT EYDROGRAPH: 1 AREA= .06 SQ MI INPUT RUNOFF CURVE: 13. TIME OF CONCENTRATION: .80 30URS INTERNAL HYDROGRAPH TIME INCREMENT: .1061 SOURS "t WARNING-MAIN TIME INCREMENT MAY 8E TOO LARGE. COMPUTED PEAK( 23.05) AT EXCEEDS MAX. ADJACENT HYDROGRAPE COORDINATE BY 5 :. - + STRUCTURE 1 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAL OISCNARGE(CPS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 119.61 23.05 '(RUNOFF) TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAP3 POINT : .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT : 1.00 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA : .06 SQ.MI. 30.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 .02 40.00 DISCEG .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .0'+ .10 4![ .1 50.00 DISCEG .14 .15 .i6 .11 .18 .19 .21 .22 .23 24 - 60.00 DISCEG :5 .27 .28 29 .30 .31 ..i4 i .37 70.00 DISCHG .39 .40 .41 .44 .45 .41 .48 .45 .52 53 80.00 DISCHG .56 .57 .59 .62 .63 .66 .a3 .7 .73 .7i. 90.30 DISCEG .14 .80 .3i 87 .90 .95 . 6 1.53 1.05 1.11 100.00 DISCEG 1.15 i.13 1.28 1.30 1.41 1.46 1.57. 1.65 1.66 1.9(: - 110.u0 DISCHG 1.96 2.11 2.36 4.44 2.99 3.08 4.73 4.54 3.79 20.42 120.00 DISCHG 21.95 9.21 1.30 5.65 4.39 4.19 3.36 3.33 2.71 2.71 130.00 DISCHG 2.63 2.43 2.42 2.20 2.17 2.06 1.18 1.77 1.33 1.32 140.00 DISCEG 1.73 1.70 1.67 1.60 1.50 1.52 1.51 1.47 1.43 1.,1 - 150.u0 DISCHG 1.31 1.37 1.32 .31 1.29 1.26 1.26 1.22 1. 1 1.19 160.00 DISCHG 1.17 1.17 [.13 [.13 1.10 1.09 1.13 1.36 106 7.14 110.00 DISCHG 1.03 1.02 1.00 1.00 .98 .98 .76 .95 .95 .93 180.00 DISCHG .93 .91 .91 .90 .89 .39 .37 .87 .86 .35 190.00 DISCEG .35 .84 .34 .82 .32 .31 .8i .30 .79 .79 - 200.00 DISCEG .18 .77 .77 .76 .76 .74 .7. .73 .73 + 210.00 DISCHG .11 .11 .70 .70 .69 .68 .68 .67 .67 .66 220.00 'DISCEG .65 .65 .64 .64 .63 .62 .61 .61 .59 • .30.00 DISCEG .59 .58 .58 .54 .06 .02 .00 - RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE 3ASEFLOW : 7.3[ WATERSHED INCHES, 268.35 CFS-31S, 22.22 ACRE-FEET; EASEFLOW : .00 072 OPERATION RESVOR STRUCTURE 1 . INPUT. 3YDROGRAFE: 7 OUTPUT 3YOROGRAPH: 6 - SURFACE ELEVATION: 320.00 PEAK TIME(HRS) HAI DISCHARCE(CFS) PEAL ELEYATION(PEET) 121.24 10.36 823.50 - TIME(ERS) FIRST HYDRuGR.IPH POINT : .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT : 1.00 EOM DRAINAGE AREA = .06 SQ.MI. 30.00 DISCEG .00 .00 .00 .00 .50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 30.00 ELEY 820.00 320.00 320.00 820.30 820.00 320.00 320.00 320.20 320.00 320.00 40.00 DISCHG .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .10 .11 - 40.00 ELEY 820.00 820.00 820.01 820.01 320.01 820.01 820.01 820.02 820.02 320.42 50.00 DISCEG .12 .13 .14 .15 .16 .13 .19 .20 .21 .22 50.00 ELEY 320.02 320.02 820.03 820.03 820.03 820.03 820.03 820.04 320.04 820.04 60.00 DISCEG .23 .25 .26 .27 .29 .30 .31 .32 .34 .35 - 60.00 ELE7 820.04 820.05 820.05 320.05 820.05 820.05 820.06 820.06 820.06 820.06 70.00 DISCEG .37 .38 .39 .41 .43 .44 .46 .47 .49 .51 10.00 ELEY 820.01 820.07 820.01 820.01 820.08 820.08 820.08 820.09 820.09 820.09 80.00 DISCHG .53 .55 .56 .58 .60 .62 .65 .67 .69 .12 80.00 ELEV 820.10 820.10 820.10 820.11 820.11 820.11 820.12 820.12 820.13 820.13 - 90.00 DISCHG .74 .17 .80 .33 .86 .89 .92 .96 1.00 1.04 90.00 ELEY 820.14 320.14 820.15 820.15 320.16 820.16 820.17 820.18 820.18 820.19 100.00 DISCHG 1.09 1.13 1.13 1.23 1.29 1.37 1.43 1.51 1.59 1.69 100.00 ELEY 820.20 820.21 820.22 820.23 820.24 820.25 820.26 820.28 820.29 820.31 - 110.00 DISCEG 1.81 1.94 2.11 2.25 2.49 2.17 3.13 3.18 5.25 1.45 110.00 ELM' 820.33 820.36 320.39 820.41 820.45 820.51 820.58 820.69 820.96 321.37 120.00 DISCEG 9.63 10.33 10.09 9.66 9.00 8.28 1.52 6.60 5.32 4.76 120.00 ELEY 823.10 823.53 823.41 823.12 822.72 822.30 821.90 821.49 821.15 820.87 130.00 DISCEG 3.13 3.13 2.77 2.54 2.36 2.23 2.12 2.05 1.97 1.90 - 130.00 ELEY 820.68 820.57 820.51 820.46 820.43 820.41 820.39 820.37 820.36 820.35 - TR20 XEQ 03-26-91 10:35 NcIENNA SAND & GRAVEL REVISED DEVELOPED CONDITION I11-2488 10 YR-14 ER 100 1R-243R 100 YR-SNON MELT 100 YEAR-10 DAY PAGE 9 140.00 DISCEG [.34 1.11 1.13 1.68 1.64 1.60 1.55 1.52 1.48 1.46 - 140.00 ELEV 820.34 820.32 820.32 820.31 820.30 820.29 820.28 820.28 820.27 320.27 150.00 DISCEG 1.43 1.40 1.37 1.34 1.32 1.30 1.28 1.26 1.23 1.22 150.00 ELEY 820.26 320.26 820.25 820.25 820.24 820.24 820.23 820.23 820.23 820.22 160.00 DISCEG 1.20 I.18 1.16 1.15 1.13 I.11 1.10 1.09 I.07 1.06 160.00 ELEY 320.72 820.22 320.2I 820.21 820.21 820.20 820.20 820.20 320.20 820.19 - 170.00 DISCEG 1.05 1.04 1.02 1.01 1.00 .99 .98 .97 .96 .95 170.00 ELEY 820.19 820.19 820.19 820.19 820.18 820.18 820.18 820.18 320.13 820.11 180.00 DISCEG .94 .93 .92 .91 .90 .90 .89 .38 .87 .86 180.00 ELEY 820.11 320.11 820.17 820.17 820.11 820.16 820.16 820.16 820.16 820.16 190.00 DISCEG .36 .85 .84 .84 .83 .82 .82 .81 .80 .80 190.00 ELEY 820.16 820.16 820.15 820.15 820.15 820.15 820.15 820.15 820.15 820.15 200.00 DISC3G .79 .18 .78 .77 .76 .76 .75 .74 .74 .73 200.00 ELEY 320.14 820.14 820.14 820.14 820.14 820.14 820.14 820.14 820.13 820.13 210.00 DISCEG .13 .72 .71 .7I .70 .69 .69 .68 .68 .67 - 210.00 ELEY 820.13 820.13 820.13 820.13 820.13 820.13 820.13 820.12 820.12 820.12 220.00 DISC3G .66 .66 .65 .64 .64 .63 .63 .62 .61 .61 220.00 ELEY 820.12 820.12 820.12 820.12 320.12 320.12 820.11 820.11 820.11 320.11 230.00 DISCEG .60 .59 .59 .51 .43 .23 .12 .06 .03 .01 230.00 ELEY 820.11 820.11 820.11 320.10 820.08 820.04 820.02 820.01 820.01 820.000 240.00 DISCS .01 .00 240.00 ELEV 820.00 820.00 RUNUP 7OLUME ABOVE 3ASEFLOi1 = 7.33 RATERSHED INCHES, 269.60 CFS-ERS, 22.28 ACRE-FEET; BASEPLOit = .00 CPS ?£RATION SAVMOV CROSS SECTION 9 INPUT a?DROGRAPE: o OUTPUT EYDROGRAPH: 1 - EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP RECORD ID COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED 701 ?ASS 5 EXECUTIVE CONTROL ?ERATIOS ENDJOE RECORD 1) :M!!.? 7111E 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN TEE ORDER ?ERFORMED (A STAR( ) AFTER TEE ?EAI DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE iCFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP BYDROGRAPB A QUESTION MARI(?) INDICATES A EYDROGRAPE HITE ?EAI AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAT DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME RUNOFF ID OPERATION AREA R COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SQ MI) (BR) (ER) (IN) (3R) (IN) (PT) (BR) (c;s) (cEN) - ALTERNATE I STORM I STRUCTURE i RUNOFF .06 2 2 .10 .0 2.40 24.00 .51 --- 12.46 1.24 162.1 STRUCTURE . RESIOR .06 2 2 .10 .0 2.40 24.00 .51 E20.07 13.30 3.65 64.0 ALTERNATE I STORM 2 STRUCTURE 1 RUNOFF 2 .10 .0 4.20 24.00 1.67 --- 72.40 35.30 628.1 STRUCTURE I 332708 .06 2 2 .10 .0 4.20 24.00 1.b7 822.71 13.48 8.98 151.5 ALTERNATE I STORM 3 STRUCTURE I RUNOFF .06 2 2 .10 .0 6.00 24.00 3.09 --- 12.39 68.07 1194.1 STRUCTURE : RESYOR .06 2 2 .10 .0 6.00 24.00 3.08 325.10 13.72 12.36 216.3 ALTERNATE I STORM 4 STRUCTURE RUNOFF .Ob 7 2 1.00 .0 7.20 240.00 7.20 --- 94.52 5.13 90.0 - STRUCTURE 1 RESVOR .06 7 2 1.00 .0 7.20 240.00 7.19 820.94 95.51 5.I5 90.4 ALTERNATE I STORM 5 STRUCTURE i RUNOFF .06 9 2 1.00 .0 10.80 235.20 7.31 --- 119.61 23.05 404.3 STRUCTURE I 3E2703 .06 9 2 1.00 .0 10.30 235.20 1.33 823.40 121.24 10.36 181.7 SUMMARY TABLE 3 - DISCHARGE (CPS) AT XSECTIONS AHD STRUCTURES FOR ALL STORKS ASD ALTERNATES - XSECTION/ DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AREA STORM NUMBERS ID (SQ NI) 1 2 3 4 5 0 STRUCTURE 1 .06 ALTERNATE I 3.65 8.98 12.36 5.15 10.36 IUD OP I JOBS IN TEIS RUN DETENTION POND DESIGN W. WALKER 03/24191 09:58:461 INPUT VARIABLE: UNITS INPUTS NOTES . - Watershed Area acres 36.60 Pervious Curve Number CN 73.00 Impervious Fraction - 0.00 Design Storm inches 2.50 Mariano Depth feet 9.50 (:10ft Bench Width be feet 10.00 ):l0ft Renck Slope he ft/ft 10.00 ):10ft horiz/ft vertical Side !lope ab ft/ft 3.00 ):3ft horiz/ft vertical Length/Width Ratio - 3.00 ):3 Top seegth c feet 400.00 (adjust to achieve volume) OUTPUT VARIABLE: UNITS VALUE - Target Volume acre-ft 1.13 (: design storm runoff volume) Oes:gn Volume acre-ft 2.45 (should be )= target volume) Design !!man Depth feet • 4.01 (should be ):4 feet) ?!acimna Retention inches 3.70 Design Stora Runoff inches 0.51 Permanent Fool Volume acre-ft 1.13 TOP CONTOUR - C Length c feet 400.00 Yi,ith c feet 131.33 Area c feet.2 26:666.6 ENCS CONTOUR - Depth b feet 1.00 Le:gti b feet 329.11 Width b feet 109.72 Elevation b feet -1.00 - Area b feet.2 18,059.08 ;OTTO?! CONTOUR a Eievacicn a feet -9.50 - !!ope Length ab feet 25.50 Length a feet [48.56 width a feet 49.52 Aria a feet-2 3,678.44 Volume feet.3 22,223.52 Volume ab feet') 84,662.47 Volume ac feet-3 106,905.19 Pail Volume acre-ft 1.45 Moan 4aeta feet 4.01 load Area acres 0.6i SK ! V / ER OUTLET TOP ELEV. 827.0 SPILLWAY ELEV. 825. 1 RI P RAP NEENAH CASTING NO. R- 1642 3' DIA. R.C.P. MANHOLE 1 .2' DIA. ORIFICE PLATE 30'- 18" C.M.P. NORMAL ELEV. INVERT 820.0 820.0 34' - 18" C.M.P. INVERT 818.5 McKENNA SAND &c GRAVEL NYHUS ENGINEERING 1 -800-446-5038 JUNE 1990, REV. 3-25-91 WEIR !- 30' '' E. } B - I I 1 .0' 14-3.- B I SECTION B-B RIPRAP 1011 A A 827.0 4110 1 .9' 825. 1 I SECTION A-A 180- i r1 ' RIPRAP � i McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL NYHUS ENGINEERING 1 -800-446-5038 JUNE 1990, REV. 3-25-91 TYPICAL SECTIONS CHANNEL S= 1 .0% ACCESS ROAD 30 . 00 - 1 GRAVEL SURFACE McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL NYHUS ENGINEERING 1 -800-446-5038 JumE 1990 SILT FENCE FILTER FABRIC SECURELY FASTENED TO POST LAY FABRIC IN ( 30" MINIMUM HEIGHT T HE TRENCH � ! • I I � a 6" 6 " / , I 24" MINIMUM Lr 'H BACKFILL OVER THE TOP CF FABRIC AND COMPACT THE SOIL McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL NYHUS ENGINEERING 1 -800-446-5038 JUNE 1990 - SILTATION & PHOSPHORUS POND PLAN BI LJL n B� 149.61 _I 329.47 I !- 400.00 ' l 597.44 SECTION A-A - SECTION 9-87 927 77 87.0 _ :;! I I 910.4 \ 910.5 k50.12,ti 149.61 -� 329.47 400.00 = 597.49 McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL NYHUS ENGINEERING 1-800-448-5038 MARCH 1991 APPENDIX SUB—BASIN BOUNDARY MAP TR-20 PRINTOUTS SUB—BASIN DEVELOPED 1 YEAR-24 HOUR STORM — DEVELOPED 10 YEAR-24 HOUR STORM. DEVELOPED 100 YEAR-24 HOUR STORM DEVELOPED 100 YEAR SNOW MELT DEVELOPED 100 YEAR-10 DAY SITE DEVELOPED 1 YEAR-24 HOUR STORM DEVELOPED 10 YEAR-24 HOUR STORM DEVELOPED 100 YEAR-24 HOUR STORM — DEVELOPED 100 YEAR SNOW MELT DEVELOPED 100 YEAR-10 DAY WALKER DETENTION POND DESIGN — SKIMiMER OUTLET DETAIL WEIR DETAIL — CHANNEL DETAIL ACCESS ROAD DETAIL SILT FENCE DETAIL PHOSPHORUS & SILTATION POND DETAIL • ° Erosion and Sedimentation Control — o Industrial Wastewater o Industrial Wastewater Recycle Pond Detail o Well Site Information — —5— DRAINAGE REPORT McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL Silt fences will be provided at the toe of the proposed berms, constructed to aid in shielding the mining operation from view, and around the down slope side of any disturbed area until the ground cover is established. The berms and disturbed areas will be immediately seeded and mulched. A storm water storage pond will be utilized to control sedimentation from leaving the site. The storage pond will also reduce the peak rate of storm water flow down stream from the site and also remove phosphorus from the storm water. Any water used is the process of aggregate will be collected is a separate sedimentation pond with a sealed bottom to prevent seepage into the soil below. The water collected in this pond will be re—used for later processing. All erosion and sediment control devices will be maintained until the site is restored. During the mining operation, site restoration will begin after 15 acres have been mined and will continue in five acre increments until the site is restored. The site will have topsoil replaced and then seeded and mulched. 22.a.4. Industrial wastewater? Industrial wastewater will consist of water used to wash aggregate. A sedimentation pond as shown on the detail plate will be constructed and used whenever aggregate washing takes place. This waste water will be collected in a sedimentation pond and recycled. No discharge of the wash water will take place overland. The sedimentation pond will be lined with impervious soil to prevent seepage to the sub- soil . The pond will be a maximum of three feet deep with 5:1 side slopes. The horizontal dimensions will depend upon the size of washing operations. The the pond will be located convenient to the mining operation. INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER RECYCLE POND PLAN I 100.00 . I TOP �-1 70.00 7) BOTTOM • 0 —, l of A { H I- ! I I i I. I 1 1 I I I i SECTION A—A _ I 100.00 1 T3.0' s: i t 1.0' IMPERVIOUS SOIL I 70.00 I McKENNA SAND & GRAVEL NYHUS ENGINEERING 1-800-446-5038 MARCH 1991 II - ° If tIsI 1 ! \_____,,_, 11 "diorl j"L.....ril_-: j 1 - ssil1r- f R 4._ . ... , _ _ _ _ _ ._ , _ _ . _ i \ - _ _ . _. - _ . , _ _ ,_ _ . ._ _ _ _ 7 ., _ .,,_. .__: __}.„,_ ' :it fr‘ 'V TION. . g 2 : .. ftitr a sI // Li' kk Q v.... 11 7.- . psiKai 111L l� I r s WELL 5 3ITES • 78 TICKET "ASSOCIATED WELL DRILLERS / 13160 Pioneer Trail N9 12 6 • i Eden Prairie,lyianesota 55343 Phone 941-1530 Permit No. ��// Tel. No. For /1/A .© M ereVii14 / Address C7 F ea-21 ,S `/l/ a Pc-' /t Job At• DATB 2/ /U WORK REQUESTED ��— jli ?,,,"Ac L= e a &SeLL - ¢C 'r 0 7eeI -- j �o _ V L 7 3 0 CA 3 i 6 . ?r .6 P ??1,e 11 'i) 8/l - — rL • DATE DESCRIPTION -1. P WORK DONE -- A . , 5-%0C) ciC azo Ea.th h (i L&E-) 230 - 10 c, )i9 s 16 6 eczv IC) I1 . .111 ice ' Customer Acknowledgment EMPLOYES DATE SOURS EMPLOYEE DATE HOUYS •ICET • N? 1099 TED WELL DR1LLnRS 13160 Pioneer Trail Eden Prairie..Minnesota 5534,, • Phone:441-1530 • Permit No. • } T . No. For. _ L >40#°' Address ,/ s Jr. - A for • Job At egBalingia,221 — r DA'TS J L/jr WORK REQUESTEDj gqo -z`Z 0 21 ) Jv/ 734 t-t-; 4 • •j...„4 Li. A2 DESCRIPTION OF WORK DONE • • Customer Acknni�Te�gtnent --- EMPLOYEE • DATE SOURS EMPLOYEE DATE HOURS . Depr.. ,.,olz Formation (.^ ' I ` • iGlacial Sand, Minnesota Geological Survey 1 , Silt & Gra vel Minneapolis, Minnesota • _ dusky brown-to- Name State 1 iyellow olive Prior Lake Indian Res . Minn. } gray, sandy, peb- Town County Ibley, calcareous Prior Lake Scott 'Loc. silt . Contractor Driller Sec. Don Rogers Well Co. 22 cad ' yellow gray-to- 100 . varicolored-to Drilling Dates IT N. , R. W( completed Dec 1970 I very light gray• Casing Record • ' poorly sorted- to-sorted, pebblkiy I i I 1 , silty-tononsil y, .4--'' s ' calcareous, dom- I 1 1 1 1inently quartzos II ` sand. S. W. L. , G. P. M. D.D. 1 I 1 ;,(yellow gray-to- - - .:!varicolored, 'Ipoorly sorted-tor, Remarks Elev. — isorted,sandy , mica used after 60 ' 895 = _' a ZOO ;3slightly silty, i 1T. D. 'lcalcareous , gravel 166 rt Prairie du Chien Logged by B. Olsen IM. G. So24ro. ';Group LOneota Dolomite Explanation `;1ight olive gray, of Colors _ ievery fine cry- - •staZline, silty , Soil '.somewhat vuggy dolomite. l i f �11L , — 300 j ( 1 Drift C i!Bottom of Hole j 1 1 Sand & Gravel 1 1 Shale ( I Sandstone __ • Limestone 1 1 Dolomite 1 I Clay 400 F__ j 1 . �± ( :v % 1 No. Samples • 3.... c ji:‘.4•• • I, 1.?"44"..4. - ''.'7. • - --i f 17 177r- 7 •� ix 7 ~ �t31i • I 1.. • .. • ; 1?. .i�5 .���;( •2 tw'3 .1.‘ C$4..1 ..1. ..0"...Cr . ..1...4.- '.". s'.3 '4:' I •• 7. .. .,. . i, ..... . . i. • 1. 1 •1 C gI •E�.K 1� 1. —t---.�••--+t. • -$ y : .....• : • • ]• mace I iXL• • I _r 7 5{2) ®1•• •^ •aa .•- • • • , II M ' —•4 S. ItM�-w 3 i • ' • t•DIDMM Jdt011 R .•�.':..w.—_ _- •••.. � j�.- ! R • • A1( •• {{ _• 1 •I • /f . ...--*--- 1+.n..3�r .girl 1 .111 I 6/v`r•J • :41. JK ' f • 1 tt N•-.rI .11=„1";-=-.7-7-.'trw..-_ ~!' 7-PRIOR• .410E • t p1•( ..,„_:.._,..,..: l =(!`�". 1• •• I •• '•• • 1 • 3• .� �_libirp 1..:I:: ®\`', 1 AfukM •i t r��1i s �� AfvY/vMf S l— ( �'.')vie �.' _ ::::.�..:.“_:::' 1 ✓i 1 4i• i , a _ — •. • I , • • )• • • ►( 1 • -_ • r _ ( V E •J..: • I + r . ��3 _ J1 • , C . R E •�D I T R/ I 1 1 • :2 s...•” • 1,......... / 1 • �.�� 'I w • 1 17 / • 1 i 7 . + - '\ / ..•fit. �• . i. I /taws • 1 1 • + l—rL —.- L- -..— I• ,' •'z �,:_ 3 n—� 2ts�. :1 s 1 p' F�`.. I N 3G . L A 1 K E 3 i 3• 23 • • l9 I =•�,` • �y 1 • 11 • 1 l • 7 • ,• • • • • ` i • • ♦eJ I •••• • 1 / `; s • C i i , 1• -- 1. . •.1 .Y' u...._ .� is � . •r.: . •. .• Q • �• • Lk•_ •• r t/ •• •1 r • 3 , — n . 1 z I (• • 1 3 •��;'n• �• j • i t 1 •� 3 , t.tt.et l.• 21 1 E� ,� • 1 • 'y,y 23 • 1• 7 . 3 I' 7..--=' 1�— • • •I 1 • • ZTAi _Irk•—K •1 • • • • . •• • I 41 . ► 1 `••\• 1 1 •• i ari • 1 31 ' I. ♦ y •113 '� I 73 7 • •. �i1 i. 1 1 • $ ---;r :2------- • J' �o^ �� IC -- J o'o •5 I 5o e 1 � H . /"1 Cr C... r r r ..,i s c•+. r `.. 1 ) 3 _ � £ ' S . �, 3 �- r-....,. 1 . ...„. 1./.3 IN, E .1 i }- 3 a� �- V a- - .__t • V - vz t 3 . f CU CA.-. — d 1, f >•, l- r p o.n .+ ft - --N 7 o 1, H Si I-t , ,,. V) -.) - --, 0' ti = J ' 0, —` " D , o as 6- ate.. —o - I S tk —X --.3 r Z r -� 7: 3 J --b 731 . ^ '- 1 U, ' ` —� �' vii -j �"l V, 7 s d) 1 =) - y y 4-1 -,r d �n .. U N j ' 13 _, -, e D 41 1 S A. 4.11 .. �l� C ate.. -mss �'I P' ....4. Si sem.., c t-i . J .... ... . :Ec , <.D j - tri + U }o c ,' - + - ‘2,---.77-1 r o,1 r C.) ....-4+n u1 -51 N x V = tin. `. -1-- 1 7 - ,y- A.1i 1 v o c cc LIN co rI o ' . � �n u) 0oc 1 i , , , -L, I 61 ro cr? T T Lc) . G7 1. -1 .. -- - -- O y ' J o z a+ s • S I � s . . d - -� Cr• f -' s,- JS . N �o t S • H c - p. V' E-1— _ ri . . 1 I C s 4. Q 2 - �. r ) ---r }y ,.. f y- T r v 3 - `` = - 7 .... ..c.= _ ,..._,... 1 _, . • ..., 34 o — ^�\a _� _._ cs:....s. ........: I. h cn 4-1 _� ; : I 6.6 t _ / W ' v r o '� ` ..) _D 3 s J )• , c.....: jr - 44 cn CI _...1).<-3c2 b --s).,7: - ::: a771 c - S 2� _._J) .� -.c!1 a ....J'':. .,,, cc....i rI i wm - `1 e per— 7.I .7 1 I- = 54 � D-1 I . LnO, Ln o k-n r4i v 00 0 t� t11 o al o c-t_ (b c--) ' L c �r' a-- r aV p z a_. .ap t I J J I s • • y >, r to o3 3 -1 I p UZ Cly 'O -Z �v�� f / _ <4 d ,--. _, cr", a -a Q- ti _v -s 3 • -+ , __.3) 7 - .� / 7 , O __-r) 1/4.1%1- \ . 3 • a4., it F_ v - - x . 0 r- C' u' o ell 0 ..r 7. 0 a p Aa •cu .04 I to O t 0 tJ•? lJ _ — Cm 4.4 _ _. — �.tA4AIISk'1 UI Rl; .t STATl Cr)�O(ISOTA OC'AiTitll(T or I ALTL Gov x44.. WATER WELL RECORD iYINNE:SOTA woouL Pr=An. AY■ la ge4.r 1/4.4..0/...411for 1144.Sumasl 7 8 S 3 0 .•..+np/444. ,Tipoor o 14444, law 144444 Saar 44 fwant A/ L WILL D[TIli 1 � Door C.ao.o ) 1 -2 • li Iv' E" 1-- 8 O ft. 11_ — 2- 3 —8 0 /L Drjv!mar wa� .11441ra r Arnim Dsalaar4aSuss An..er Cw 4,d / 1 Lamm_ i mm� r.,r 14DD . 3 7 ass= S i'- -t-CL G , ll IC Coble NW IC ..�._ ries m D,q 7C D , / Sia, a yow. si is scam srot Inca-Y' - Sir4a r.aa4l taus 2:7140110.,ter 5C Air C 14d 1)C II 1 i ' ' Arran Nan, 11114ry C Jou/ 40 Pomo Moor "ter—..r—+ow‘..1—. ♦DimS.c+G F7.Uf)5 W ' 1 [ J.USi 1 1. Mas ' MI DarmoC Mor mag wag 'C)iPomoc fu _ •a 70 Lmciaa SC roilie 4D La aa. 7 . .J• . T�*.� a Too Well C liararml IC Ca.r.d 70 Air Eamikiauq) 110 t I.4.ir�...4 I.CASING HOLZ D(AM. Z 'Q ,7` i S C Tfn_41 tCGHT:M...1.i.. o,C/ i L �./YL/)'i. � C Gln. S{llrriy Salsa _R """' 8 �1 '� / s .. v(9/L.CI..e� a r+..tK .. c h Orme Shod Y`� //. Co.„--I y o — 1 ?OCOrATJOtt LOG 1 C 1%,:(14,9•41 Frox I To q is.,a. '9-11-1c w.;Mt-_.....L/ .../R ••2 2.8y `4- i..t. h worm �,h �a ` Fir-rLey-�I�-L. � �z` 0 30 I.SCx:>Q( a.� -4.-,..." ,imam l �� h r �' �� Q a J ¢-1•.rt.>,—e.2 0-u.... P 3 0 1 ya T.„. Iy. r SiouGarae 1 J -,"11../.£4/2-44,__-' Se haw* h aro h ^& .1a ST^Tu war=LvF1 A/Le/ }' WW1/ IliD 7O /`74 8 ti.M Ca.. - Dua,(omm.. l:— 3 - 8 0 j tar/t:rce — j.. �'t � 1 I 11.?I. ? G 1tVT (Oar,two*wood /� �t ,5 p 1L aGr yrs.pay4� LA-i 1 14,...f.,( 1- 1.,filee i.•7V. <O 0 !L aka tors.= S.O-ra- 1Z HEAD WELL COI[ LETION '_ 1 1 I I 1 IC Mow~sr. ro .aunraar __ 2C Eaamrrt attar a At Sims IT air..port/ IS WELL GROUTED? 4 Yr G N. latrm.t C....t� � " a DiMkAA� a . urid .. � ta Cris a ' trim L 0 y, 2/ k,a yds I 14.NEAREST SOURCES Of POSLBLE 1-10, 10_42 S u„, N o &woos r.0 7r4 = I 1 .1 Wei/., las/ aapo ammoat>. a t , Yr O Na .6.4.v/ti.,..(," . 1 1 Li PUlrl Oro 4441114 /�- -- .3•-..3 0 Not ic. L[ ! 44414m i I I I 'l4rataasnr'a r�/1 L Wail 444.4 !J ! 7 5' pa 3A' .,.- 2.o 2 / i I a)asQddS.a.rsi C aq /C/-'/ CisT , 1.Sr Rariroa4,i s." 1 . Ill=STOG WELLSI wog Y prre O Y.. ON. ••••=d444 i/a.. Um a ad 3l! O }y�r>•t O T »tAIrc ELEVATION.SO URCE Of DATA. AOa.ms� erorfr7 O Nat amid 17. • 12.WATER WEILL CONTRACTORS CF377SCATIOIV ,, ..\•-. . T1i4 o4/S w drill molr:,17r+•�in mor f it(wort i sae w tae boo 447 -- - .- ± 6 9 0 271 -n.ry -34"LPle 4- 174 01 7 41 .- L4444 eaa.44 , - Aroma 3 0 .? E'er --444- -47- .. • • n \ Arw..tmr ieonam„uw aNa..4 Drwa i WORK COPY /4 /o laa1Mr..10.11D ONSENT 4(leiw. MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Scott County Recycling Agreement DATE: June 11, 1991 INTRODUCTION: On March 5, 1991 the Shakopee City Council directed the appropriate City officials to submit a funding request to Scott County to offset costs associated with a full fledged City recycling and cleanup day. Staff is pleased to report that our funding request has received approval from the Scott County Environment Health Department staff and is being recommended to the County Board for formal approval . BACKGROUND: In order for the City of Shakopee to receive the requested grant proceeds, it will be necessary for the City of Shakopee to enter into an agreement with Scott County which outlines the intended use of the grant funds. Attached is the Recycling Program Agreement between the City of Shakopee and Scott County. The agreement provides funding for the following City recycling related programs. 1. City recycling cleanup program - $7 , 350. 00 2 . Yard waste collection - $4 , 500. 00 3 . Recycling containers - $4 , 000. 00 The City recycling cleanup portion of the grant program has successfully been completed by the City of Shakopee. Since the County has received funding from the Metropolitan Council which supports the aforementioned grant program it is quite likely that the county Board will approve our grant request and subsequent Recycling Program Agreement. It would be appropriate at this time to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the Recycling Program Agreement between the City of Shakopee and Scott County. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the Recycling Program Agreement between the City of Shakopee and Scott County. 2 . Table action pending further information from staff. 3 . Do not authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the Recycling Program Agreement between the City of Shakopee and Scott County. AU/BS/RECYPROG STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1. ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the Recycling Program Agreement between the City of Shakopee and Scott County. AU/BS/RECYPROG RECYCLING PROGRAM AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into on this 21st day of May, 1991, between the COUNTY OF SCOTT, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY by and through the Scott County Board of Commissioners, and THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, Scott County Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as CITY, by and through the City Council. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Minnesota Stat. Section 473 . 8441, establishes the Local Recycling Development Program providing grants to counties to be distributed by the Metropolitan Council; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Stat. Section 115A.557, establishes the County Waste Reduction and Recycling Funding program to be distributed by the Minnesota Office of Waste Management; and WHEREAS, Scott County has received funding from the Metropolitan Council identified as Local Recycling Grant SG-90-114 and from the Office Of Waste Management; and WHEREAS, These funds are to be used for the activities specified in the Metropolitan Council Grant Agreement SG-90-114 and Scott County Resolution No. 90090; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59 authorizes two or more governmental units, by agreement, to jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting parties or similar powers; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this Agreement, the parties mutually agree to the following terms and conditions: 1. PURPOSE This Agreement shall establish a mechanism for distribution of funds obtained from the Metropolitan Council and Minnesota Office of Waste Management in accordances with respective agreements related thereto for implementation and/or enhancement of recycling programs in Cities and Townships within Scott County consistent with the COUNTY Solid Waste Master Plan as approved by the Metropolitan Council. PAGE 1 2. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by all parties to the Agreement. 3 . TERM OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall remain in effect until December 31, 1991 or until all obligations set forth in this Agreement have been satisfactorily fulfilled unless earlier terminated as provided in Section 20 herein. 4. GRANT REQUEST The CITY shall establish recycling programs as set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 5. GRANT PAYMENT The COUNTY shall pay to the CITY a maximum of $15,850.00 to be used for the development and/or enhancement of CITY recycling programs. The CITY shall use these grant funds solely for the materials and/or programs as set forth in Exhibit A. 6. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the maximum amount of grant payment available to the CITY in 1991 for the projects specified in Exhibit A shall be as specified in Section 5 above. Any funding availability for future years or for other recycling projects shall be at the complete discretion of the COUNTY. 7 . UNEXPENDED FUNDS Any grant payments provided to the CITY under this Agreement shall be returned to the County in the event the grant payment is not used according to the requirements of this Agreement or has not been used within twelve (12) months of receipt by the CITY, whichever occurs first. 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT OF SCOTT COUNTY Scott County shall appoint an authorized agent for the purpose of administration of this Agreement. The CITY is notified of the authorized agent of Scott County as follows: Allen J. Frechette Environmental Health Manager Courthouse A102 428 S. Holmes St. Shakopee, MN 55379-1393 (612) 496-8177 PAGE 2 • 9. RECORDS - AVAILABILITY AND RETENTION Complete and accurate records of the activities performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be kept by the CITY for a minimum of three years following termination of this Agreement. The retention period shall be automatically extended during the course of any administrative or judicial action involving the County of Scott regarding matters to which the records are relevant. The retention period shall be automatically extended until the administrative or judicial action is finally completed or until the authorized agent of the County notifies the CITY in writing that the records need no longer be kept. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 16B.06, Subd. 4, the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the CITY relative to this Agreement shall be subject to examination by the County and the State Auditor. 10. Indemnification The CITY shall save and protect, hold harmless, indemnify, and defend the County, its commissioners, officers, agents, employees and volunteer workers against any and all liability, causes of action, claims, loss, damages or cost and expense arising from, allegedly arising from, or resulting directly or indirectly from any errors and omissions and/or negligent acts and omissions of the CITY in the performance of this Agreement. 11. SUBCONTRACTS The CITY shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement nor assign this Agreement without the prior written approval of the authorized agent of the County. The CITY shall ensure and require that any subcontractor agrees to and complies with all of the terms of this Agreement. Any subcontractor of the CITY used to perform any portion of this Agreement shall report to and bill the CITY directly. The CITY shall be solely responsible for the breach, performance or nonperformance of any subcontractor. 12. COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW In performing the provisions of this Agreement, both parties agree to comply with all applicable federal, state or local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations or standards established by any agency or special governmental unit which are now or hereafter promulgated insofar as they relate to performance of the provisions of this Agreement. In entering into this Agreement, the CITY, its agents, employees and any subcontractors of the CITY in carrying out the terms and conditions of this Agreement, agree to abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Governmental Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as amended, and Minn. Rules promulgated pursuant thereto. PAGE 3 13. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS The County and the CITY, respectively, bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants of this Agreement. Neither the County nor the CITY shall assign, sublet, or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other. 14. ACCESS TO PREMISES The CITY shall arrange access as necessary to work sites for the County for the purpose of verification of any requirements as described in this Agreement. 15. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR It is agreed that nothing contained in this Agreement is intended or should be construed as creating the relationship of copartner, joint venturers, or an association with the County and the CITY. The CITY is an independent contractor and neither it, its employees, agents, subcontractors nor representatives shall be considered employees, agents or representatives of the County. Except as otherwise provided herein, the CITY shall maintain, in all respects, its present control over the means and personnel by which this Agreement is performed. From any amounts paid to the CITY, there shall be no deduction for federal income tax or FICA payments nor for any state income tax, nor for any other purposes which are associated with an employer/employee relationship unless otherwise required by law. Payment of federal income tax, FICA payments, state income tax, unemployment compensation taxes, and other payroll deductions and taxes are the sole responsibility of the CITY. 16. NOTICES Any notices to be given under this Agreement shall be given by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Postal Service, addressed to the CITY at its address stated herein, and to the authorized agent of the County at the address stated herein. 17. CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement is to be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 18. AMENDMENTS The Parties agree that no amendments, alterations, variations, or modifications to this Agreement, or any attachments hereto, shall have any force or effect unless the change is reduced to writing and duly signed by the parties. The execution of the change shall be authorized and signed in the same manner as for this Agreement. PAGE 4 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT It is understood and agreed that this Agreement and the attached Exhibit A constitute the entire Agreement of the parties and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the County and the CITY relating to the subject matter hereof. Any conflict or inconsistency between Exhibit A and this Agreement shall be resolved in favor of, and be governed by this Agreement. 20. TERMINATION This Agreement shall terminate under the following circumstances: a. By mutual written Agreement of the parties; b. By either party, with or without cause, giving not less than thirty (30) days written notice, delivered by mail or in person to the other party, specifying the date of termination; c. This Agreement shall automatically terminate without notice on December 31, 1991. 21. PROPERTY DISTRIBUTION Assets acquired in whole or in part with grant payments provided under this Agreement shall be the property of the CITY so long as said assets are used by the CITY for the purpose stated in Exhibit A. In the event the CITY discontinues use of the assets for said purpose, any remaining assets shall, at the County' s discretion, either be returned to the County or sold, and the net proceeds of such sale returned to the County. 22. SEPARABILITY In the event any provision of this contract shall be held invalid and unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall be valid and binding upon the parties unless such invalidity or non-enforceability would cause the contract to fail its purpose. One or more waivers by either party of any provision, term, condition or covenant shall not be construed by the other party as a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same by the other party. 23 . EQUAL EMPLOYMENT, NONDISCRIMINATION AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION In connection with the work under this Agreement, the CITY agrees to comply with the applicable provisions of state and federal equal employment opportunity and nondiscrimination statutes and regulations. In addition, upon entering into this Agreement, the CITY certifies that it has been made fully aware of Scott County' s Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action Policy, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B through both oral and PAGE 5 written communications, that it supports this policy and that it will conduct its own employment practices in accordance therewith. Failure on the part of the CITY to conduct its own employment practices in accordance with County Policy may result in the withholding of all or part of regular payments by the County due under this Agreement unless or until the CITY complies with the County Policy, and/or suspension or termination of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed intending to be bound thereby. THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE COUNTY OF SCOTT By: By: Gary Laurent William Koniarski, Chairman SCOTT COUNTY Board of Commissioners A1rx ST: By: By: Dennis Kraft Joseph F. Ries, Co. Admin. City Administrator Dated: Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM By: James A. Terwedo Co. Atty. Exhibit A City of Shakopee 1991 Waste Abatement Request for Funds Program Description For the past five years the City of Shakopee has sponsored a Community Cleanup Day. This program has allowed Shakopee residents to dispose of miscellaneous junk at a cost substantially below the market rate. The City has typically absorbed a large portion of the disposal costs. In an effort to encourage Shakopee residents to be more responsible for the garbage that they create the City has implemented a volume based refuse program. For the past two years the City has also charged a gate fee at the Community Cleanup Day. In 1990 we also worked with Scott County to obtain funding to offset the cost of disposing of appliances at the Community Cleanup Day. This year the City of Shakopee would like to request Scott County funding assistance in the following three areas: 1. City Recycling Cleanup Program - $7350 . 00 2 . Fall Yardwaste Collection - $4500. 00 3 . Recycling Containers - $4000. 00 City Recycling Cleanup Program In 1991 the City of Shakopee would again like to sponsor a City Cleanup program as has been done in the past. However, in 1991 the City would like to place more emphasis on the collection of recyclable items as opposed to junk. Shown in attachment #1 is a flyer which outlines the specifics of the 1991 City Recycling Cleanup Program. The City of Shakopee would like to request Scott County to fund the program expenditures that relate to marketing the 1991 program and the collection and processing of recyclable items including batteries, yard waste, appliances, brush, scrap metal and tires. A detailed budget outlining program cost estimates is shown in attachment #2 . The total grant request for the City Recycling Cleanup Program is $7450 . 00 . The City is projecting that the cost for disposing of refuse collected will be offset by the gate fees imposed on junk loads. (Est. refuse disposal costs - $6650. 00) Fall Yardwaste Collection Program In 1991 the City of Shakopee would like to offer a compost program for Shakopee residents to dispose of yardwaste. The program would be offered in the same format as our Recycling Cleanup Program. In other words, on a specified Saturday in October the City would provide residents with a means to dispose of yardwaste including grass, leaves and brush. Shown in Attachment #3 is a detailed budget for the proposed fall Compost Program. The estimated cost for the program is $4500. 00 . City Recycling Containers Approximately two years ago Scott County provided funds to offset a portion of the City' s cost to acquire recycling containers for Shakopee residents. Since that time, over 200 new homes have been constructed in our community. We would therefore like to request Scott County to consider providing funds to offset City cost for acquiring 500 additional recycling containers. This would provide us with an inventory of containers to replace damaged or lost containers as well as providing containers to new households. The estimated cost for the acquisition of the containers is $4000 . 00 . ATTACHMENT #2 Shakopee Recycling Clean-Up Program Expenditures Projected Batteries $ 250. 00* Tires (Moust Fiber Fuels) $ 500 . 00* Appliances (J.R. ' s) $ 1, 000 . 00* Yard Waste (Waste Management, Inc. ) $ 2, 000 . 00* Brush $ 1, 000 . 00* Promotion $ 1, 200. 00* Administration $ 1, 400. 00* Refuse Disposal (Waste Management, Inc) $ 6, 250. 00 Contingency $ 400 . 00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $14 , 000. 00 Revenues County Grant $ 7, 350. 00 Gate Fees $ 6 , 650. 00 TOTAL REVENUES $14, 000 . 00 * Proposed Reimbursable Items ATTACHMENT #3 Fall Yardwaste Collection Program Expenditures Projected Yardwaste Disposal (Waste Management) $ 3 , 000. 00 Promotions $ 1, 000. 00 Administration $ 500. 00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 4, 500. 00 Revenues County Grant $ 4 , 500 . 00 TOTAL REVENUES $ 4, 500. 00 CONSENT Ili TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: 1991/92 Insurance Renewals DATE: June 10, 1991 Introduction Attached is a list of property/liability insurance premiums for the renewal of the present coverage. Background The policies proposed are essentially the same as current coverage. The premiums are similar to last year, considering that there are some changes in items covered. Please see attachments A and B. The total premium has decreased from $188,832 to $187,748 covering the City, SPUC and HRA. The decrease is due to rate differences and experience. Attachment B also shows the dividend history and the loss history for recent years. Please note the large loss incurred in 1987. Because of our participation in the League program, this loss has not resulted in a large increase in our cost of insurance or in the cancellation of our coverage. Council did not budget for an umbrella policy nor has there been a recent request for or discussion of getting another umbrella policy. We have five underground fuel storage tanks. The State Super Fund has increased the size of its program so that cities do not need to have separate insurance for underground tanks. We still need to do the testing and any upgrading required for our tanks. The Public Works Director has requested funds for this work in the 1991 Shop Budget. Building Ordinance Coverage. If for example, the City Hall building was damaged to the 50% level, our insurance would pay the 50% level to repair the building. However, if because of the 50% damage the Building Inspector says that the building must be brought up to current codes, insurance would not pay for the additional cost to update the building. There is coverage available on a blanket or on a building by building basis to pay for the additional expense. The cost for this endorsement is 10% of the building premium or about $2,000 for all buildings. The Building Inspector estimated that the City Hall, Eagle Creek Hall and the building that Recreation is in do not meet code. The Marquette Bank building has also been covered. The policy includes a limited amount of coverage ($10,000) for removal of asbestos under the "pollutant clean-up" and "debris removal" coverage for damaged buildings. However, asbestos removal is relatively expensive. There is an option to purchase more coverage in an amount determined by the city on a building by building basis. The cost is about $0.13 per $100.00 of coverage. I have requested that the Building Inspector survey city buildings to determine the extent of the asbestos situation and an estimated cost of removal. The policies of course are not prepared, but there is more detail available on the proposals for any Councilmember that desires it. Council recently dropped workerscompensation insurance for elected officials, boards and commissions. The League has a new program to provide accident coverage to volunteers. The cost would be about $1,740 including the medical coverage. Attached is a League memo explaining the program. If Council wants to provide this coverage, this memo should be pulled off consent and staff directed to add the volunteers accident coverage to the city's policy. Action Requested Move to accept the property/liability insurance proposals of the League of Minnesota Cities and Hartford as outlined by the Capesius Agency for a total cost of approximately $187,748.00. CITY OF SHAKOPEE -6- c M P A N Y PREM I U NA G O NAP A R I S O N S U M M A R Y 1991 - 1992 1990- 1991 PROPERTY $ 26 , 837 $ 20 , 647 INLAND MARINE $ 5 , 961 $ 4 , 904 CRIME $ 2 , 335 $ 2 , 335 GENERAL LIABILITY $ 96 , 444 $ 91 , 672 ERRORS & OMMISSIONS $ 13 , 291 $ 22 , 438 INVERSE CONDEMNATION $ 5 , 305 $ 5 , 563 AUTOMOBILE $ 30 , 175 $ 33 , 873 BOILER & MACHINERY $ 7 , 400 $ 7 , 400 TOTAL PREMIUM $ 187 , 748 $ 188 , 832 CITY OF SHAKOPEE -5- F' R E M I U M S U M M A R Y 1991 / 1992 PROPERTY $ 26 , 837 INLAND MARINE $ 5 , 961 CRIME $ 2 , 335 GENERAL LIABILITY $ 96 , 444 ERRORS & OMMISSIONS $ 13 , 291 INVERSE CONDEMNATION $ 5 , 305 AUTOMOBILE $ 30 , 175 BOILER & MACHINERY $ 7 , 400 TOTAL PREMIUM $ 187 , 748 Loss History Year Total Incurred Loss 6-30-85/86 $ 128 , 461 6-30-86/87 $841 , 806 6-30-87/88 $ 21 , 152 6-30-88/89 $ 9 , 819 6-30-89/90 $ 20 , 321 6-30-90/91 $ 13 , 369 Dividend History 1988 - $ 19 , 772 1989 - $33 , 202 1990 - $38 , 509 immmJW'PIAY 183 University Ave.East I 2 9 1 :i1 r)) St.Paul,MN 55101-2526 League of Minnesota Cities (612)227-5600(FAX:221-0986) ,- PF'- !!.!Q. jj rra;!!,y 1*,j April 19, 1991 To: Cities and agents - LMCIT workers compensation program From: LMCIT Board of Trustees Re: Accident coverage for city volunteers The LMCIT Board of Trustees is pleased to announce a new program to provide accident protection to city volunteers. This program provides a schedule of benefits to compensate city volunteers who are injured while performing volunteer services for the city. This optional coverage is available to member cities of the LMCIT workers compensation program. Whom will the new program cover? With only a few exceptions, all city volunteers working under the city's direction and control will be automatically covered on a blanket basis if the city chooses to add this coverage. This could include, for example, coaches and instructors in recreation programs, volunteers working on a city-sponsored festival or celebration, "clean-up day" volunteers, etc. The city will not need to list the individuals who are to be covered, either by name or by project; nor will the city need to keep track of the time the various volunteers put in. There are four classes of volunteers who would not be automatically covered: 1. Volunteers who are covered by workers compensation. Certain volunteers are defined to be "employees° for purposes of workers compensation, and are therefor eligible for workers compensation benefits if they are injured. These include volunteer firefighters, ambulance attendants, first responders, law enforcement assistance volunteers, and civil defense volunteers. Since these volunteers are already protected by workers compensation, they are not covered under this plan. 2 . City council, board, committee, and commission members. Other coverage options are already available for these people. The workers compensation law gives cities the option to extend workers compensation coverage to elected and appointed officials. LMCIT has also for several years offered an accident policy underwritten by CIGNA for members of city councils, boards, and committees. 3 . Members of private organizations which provide services or participate in city-sponsored activities as a group. 4 . Volunteers working on construction or demolition projects. These volunteers will not be covered automatically. However, for an additional charge, the city can add coverage for volunteers on a specific construction or demolition project. What benefits would an injured volunteer receive? The plan will provide three basic benefits: 1 . Disability benefit. A volunteer who is unable to engage in the activites of his/her normal occupation because of an injury suffered while performing volunteer services for the city will receive a disability benefit of $400/week for up to 26 weeks. 2 . Death benefit. If a volunteer dies as a result of an injury suffered while performing volunteer services for the city, a death benefit of $100, 000 will be paid to the volunteer's survivors or estate. 3 . Impairment benefit. If a volunteer suffers a permanent impairment or disability as a result of an injury suffered while performing volunteer services for the city, the volunteer will receive a lump sum payment as compensation for that impairment. Payments are based on the percentage of disability, ranging from $750 for a 1% disability to $100, 000 for 100% disability. The percentage of disability is determined in the same manner used for impairment compensation in the workers compensation system. For an additional charge the city can add coverage for up to $1000 of medical costs. This limited medical coverage is intended to pick up relatively minor first aid costs. On more serious injuries, it could also be applied ta costs which the individual would otherwise have to bear under his/her own health coverage's deductible or co-pay provisions. What does it cost? The cost is based on the city's population. The basic annual charge is $ . l0 per capita, subject to a minimum premium of $150 and a maximum premium of $1500 . The additional cost to add the optional medical coverage is 45% of the basic premium. Coverage for volunteers working on a construction or demolition project can be added for a charge of $300 per project, or $435 per project if the optional medical coverage is included. The expiration date of this coverage will be coordinated with the city's LMCIT workers compensation coverage. For cities that add this coverage mid-term, the initial premium will be pro-rated. Why would the city want this coverage? Aren't injuries to volunteers already covered under the city's liability coverage? An injury to a volunteer would be covered by the LMCIT liability coverage only if the city was legally liable for that injury; that is, if the injury was caused by some negligence by the city or a city officer or employee or another city volunteer. However, just as with any other tort claim, the city would not be liable for an injury to a volunteer if the volunteer him/herself were more at fault than the city, or if the injury were simply an accident that really wasn't anyone's fault. A volunteer coach being hit in the head by a batted baseball might be an example of the latter situation. The volunteer accident coverage protects the volunteer on a "no-fault" basis. The benefits are automatically payable if the injury occurs while the volunteer is performing services for the city, regardless of whose fault it was. Besides protecting the volunteer whose injury isn't caused by the city's negligence, having these no-fault benefits available could also help avoid litigation in cases where the city (or a city officer, employee, or other volunteer) is or may be at fault. The injured volunteer can receive these benefits without getting into an adversary situation against the city. Of course, if the volunteer's injuries exceeded the benefits paid under this coverage, he/she would still be able to make a tort claim against the city for those excess damages, if the injury was caused by the city's negligence. Why did LMCIT create a whole new program? Why not just offer a "voluntary workers compensation endorsement" and provide workers compensation benefits to volunteers? The LMCIT Board chose this approach for several reasons. First, this approach is substantially less expensive to the city than providing workers compensation benefits would be. The basic premiums are roughly a fifth of the cost of workers compensation benefits, reflecting the more limited scope of benefits provided. Second, administration is simpler for the city, since the city doesn't have to keep records of how many hours were worked by how many volunteers, etc. Third, it eliminates the problem of determining what the appropriate indemnity rate is for an unpaid volunteer. (This is particularly problematic with volunteers who don't have other paying employment. ) Fourth, providing voluntary workers compensation coverage would create a potentially unlimited risk for LMCIT, since the reinsurance LMCIT purchases from the state workers compensation reinsurance association wouldn't apply to this exposure. The LMCIT Board was very concerned about the danger of assuming an open-ended risk that conceivably could jeopardize the financial stability of the entire pool in a catastrophic situation. How do we enroll? To enroll, complete the attached form and return it to Berkley Administrators. (Don't worry, this isn't someone new. EBA has just changed its name. It's still the same company that has administered LMCIT's workers compensation program since 1980. ) They will bill the city for the premium. Further information Call Pete Tritz or Pat Deshler at the League office if you have any questions or need any additional information. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST ACCIDENT PLAN FOR CITY VOLUNTEERS Application for Coverage The City of hereby requests coverage under the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust's Accident Plan for City Volunteers effective and agrees to pay the premium established by LMCIT for that coverage. Optional coverages to be included: $1000 medical coverage Yes No Construction or demolition project Yes No Please describe each construction or demolition project to be covered, including the nature and scope of the project, the dates, and the approximate number of volunteers who will be involved. Signature Position Date Return this form to: Berkeley Administrators P.O. Box 59143 Minneapolis, Mn. 55459-0143 )"" * r * rr * rrrr * rr For * rrr r A1C C) * C)C)Cf W C)C)O)0)C)C)C)0)0)0)0) C) * MM * C)C)C)O) * MM MM * C)C)C) C) - (0 W * (4(4 W W W W W W W WW W W W W W * WW * W W W W * WW WW * W W W 2 CO O * 000000000000000 0 * 00 * 0000 * 00 00 * 000 m r C) * 000000000000000 N * NN * 0000 * WW NN * NNN C) r * (0(0(0(0(0C(O(00000(0(0(0(0(0 00 * WW * 0000 * 00 COW * 0)0C) X C) r Z -1 0 < o 0 000000000000000 0 00 0000 0 0 00 000 D m 4' C) C)C)Cf O)O)C) C)C)O)C)C)0)O)C) O)C) 0)0)0)0) C)C) O)Cl C)C)C) -i N \ \\',... \\\\\\ \ \\ \\\\ \\ \\ \\\ m 2 ►- r 1+1... rr r r 1...1... r r 0..0...1... D N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN N N N N NN NN N N N X \ \\.\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \\ \\\\ \\ \\ \\\ 0 (0 (0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0 (0 (O(0 (0(0(0(0 (0(0 (0(0 (0(0(0 ID ►- r 1-.,-. rrrr rr 1-.1-. rrr m M > 3 0 C A A C) r r z A W W N rr oONO)CfIWrNWNWv N Or 00 ANN tCrrrW ANN N(OW AO)O)r (O(0 I-C)00VU)UIWANOr(ON(ON 00 -4C)r 00000000) O1WW MOW r0)AO ✓r rWr C)rCOU)U)r ArNAOC 00 U)rA O)rrrN 000 (00(0 01(OWA ✓r oO�I,IANC)A000WCr0r0J1 00 (00(0 UIWWWC) 000 000 000000 * * * * * * * * W 0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0) 0)0)0)0) W W W WWWW T.> m m D D D zo CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC > mm >>>> (/)(/) CCC -< (N(nU(/)V)Uf(nNU)U)V)U)CC)(nN C .mom mmmm cn(N mm -4-4-i D ......t-44-IMI-IMM 4 m mm :o=== ZZ 000 Z ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ 23 ZZ •<-<-<-< DD < mmmrnmmmmmmmrnmmm NN 3i ZZ 000 m 23 A (N0000000,000000,WWWWWWWW )U(/)U)U)(C) W 0000 mm 00 rnmm z0000000,000000, C �)rnmrn -1-1 mm ZZZ 0 1-1 m-n�1m .. .. -1--1 0 X 000000000000000 r 00 00 aaa z CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC -I V M M M 00 >>> C) V -1-4-4-I-4-4-1-4-4-4-44-1 .MM'O.M 33 ZZ rrr 2 z rn-1-r1m-n-n,I n�tmmmM-TIM 0000 0 000 CC p•9• w(nu) 0 0 -4-1-4--I-1-1-4-1--I-i•1-(-4-4-( CCC X C -1-1-4-1----1-•1-(--(.-i-1- -4 AnCC) DD Timm A m mrnmmmmmrnmmmmmm 0000 NN VVV m -1 a =====a=aa===map 4) 00000000000000w ACO) «-C G) N m 23 N mUNCOUWNV)NNNWWW0 m NN NOON -4- NV) mmm rr C .O C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 0 CC C C C C XIM CC 000 -( XI C m V m m m m m m m m m m m V C VM V V V V DI* MM CCC m M )-I'0.0.9MMMMTIM'O'O'V•V 0 M -CM u-o u o << MM HMN 1 D Vrrrrrrrrrrrrrr V rr rrrr mm rr mmm C) H1-/MM....MM/-(MMM I-41-4 1-11-411-4/-4 rr MM 0 m 3mmmrnmmmmrnrnmmmm 3 mm mmmm mm 333 m DU)(NNU)U)(NNw0000U0 > (/)CC) w(NU)U) 5202e U)(/) >>> N 3 ►r M 1-15-41-4 C) D Z Z 0V) ZZZ m -4 -1 -4 CC -1-4-4-r I--1 WW 13 OW -4 1-11-4 M OW 0 --4-4 Z O 000000000000000 0 0 0 0000 00 O O 000 D ✓ r rr rrrr rr rr rrr 0 I 111111111 I 11111 I ii 1 1 1 1 11 11 111 C) A 4:114:14.4.4142.>42.4 >> A A A AAAA 41..0. A A AAA 0 N NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NJ NN NNNN WW NN NNN C ✓ W rr rrrr WW rr WWW Z 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 00 0000 0 0 O O NNN -1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 11 11 III A W(00)C)A AWW A OW WAW,- rr AA AWW Z N rr ArNrrrV C)UIU)NNN N rr ANrU1 Nr WW ANr 0 V ......NrrrC)roo C)r C) rr rrrr rr r0 rrr • I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 I I 11 I I I A W(00)0)AAWW A 01W 01AWr rr AA AWW w N rr ArNrrr VC)U)U)NNN N rr ANI-.0 Nr NN ANr Z N r ✓ !t 0 Of "V I • r 0 N 1 40 i SRr I . m N D * * * * * CO C) * * * * * D m * * * * * C) 1 I I 1 I m C) C) C) C) C) X X X X 7 0 N N N V) r * 1.-r * I- r * r * r * r * r- * r * r * r * r * r * 0)0) * 0) CO * 0) * CO * 0) * C) * 0) * 0) * C) * 0) * C) .CD * CJ 41 * W W * C) * CJ * W * W * CJ * C.) * W * W * S (D * r r- * r- r- * r * r * .- * - * O * O * O * 0 * rn r * A A * W W * NJ * NJ * 0 * O * (D * CO * CO * 00 * C) * V V * U1 A * (1) * 0 * C.) * 0 * r * V * CJ * O * 7C 0 M Z -4 0 -C f 0 0 ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0)0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 01 0) 0) 0) -1 (n �� -, \ m 2 t-•)-• r r r r r r r r r r A NN NJ N N N NJ NJ N NJ N NJ X \\ \ \ \ \ \ - \ \ - 0 CO CO (D (D CO CO (D CO (D CO CO (D 4 rr r r r )... r 4- r r r r m m D 3 r r 0 W CA) - NN l.0 U1 C . _ - - Z 1--.i..-.. NN C.)C.) NCO IAA r C..)C...) I-•i•-• -i ANN NN V1 CP AA Cil U1 0)01 0)0) .-r- 0)0) 0)0) VV 00 IV 0) 00 C)0) V V 00 V V CO CO V V CO Ca) 00 010) CJ N N. 00 . rr 00 AA NN CO Cfl CO CO 00 00 Col 1-..N 00 0)0) AA 00 eco 00 00 00 00 NU) * * * * it M. * * * * * 0101 0 0 0 0 C) C) C) C) CO CO an C 73 rn m 0 0 n 0 C a 4 a 73 --(-4 -N( (/)RI Z 13 3 Ca m -I 3 3 C) u) Ti 0 C rn 0.+ D 0 < D D 0 m -< 0 -( 9* Z C Z rn Z Z D Z Z rn C) C) I z -4 0 ,3 rr -4 0 N 0 00 z 1-4 D 3 r C 0 Al C C G) 1- ►+ Z 7e CO C) I C) 00 C) 0 a 0 a = I-1 0 rn -n N M( r. rn Z 0 r( 0 4 N 3 z ) C) 3 I- 0 2 < - 0 ,C D (-- a Z C) 4 A r-- D AP 1 w 0 Z r 01 z C) C) • n (/) t 1 rn XI 4 Cn N 3 4 4 1-11 U) m (n 0 4 1-( MI C C 0 A 23 A C A C 0 4 --( O 4 xi -4 r+ 0 C 73 C 4 z 0 rn '14 '*1 0 Z -11 r+ 11 H 4 -43 -n 3 r To xr -I 4 D 4 I"- CO m m m N 0 4 m 3 3 rn rn rn 4(n C .4 D D Cl) CO .4 CA < 3 rn 4 < r-( X 1--1 0 < C) > I- C z D Z I 73 -1 CO -I -I -I 0 1-1 0 4 I"- -4 N rq 0 1 00 0 0 0 W 0 0 O O O NJ D /-.1-• r - r- r r r I- r r W C) I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 C) la it. A A .A. A A . A A A A O CIN N N W W NJ N N NJ W W C 5-,- r- NJ 01 - W r CJ r (D r- Z 0 0 N N 0 0 N (n N 0 0 0 -I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I CJ W A A CO Cl1 CJ A A A W (0 Z r-N N A r V r N A NJ r V 0 ✓r V r- r N r V r r W 0 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I W W A A CO A (4 A A A (4 A 1-1 1.-•NJ NJ A r r r NJ A N r 5- Z W NJ NJ H W r v1 0 0 V C)1 0 CJ r at 0 A NJ (0 0) C) CD 0) V 4 I r 0 • r- O N) CO St r k. I rn 4 CO > * * * * * * * * * * * Cr) 0 * * * * * * * * A. * * D rn * * * * * * * * * * * 0 1 I 1 I I I I i 1 i 1 rn * 0 C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) (n N N (n (n N N Cif CA (n C!) NJ ✓rrr * r * r * rrrr * * r * r * r * r r 0000 * O) * O) * 0)0)O)O) * O)O)O)O)O)O)O) * 0) * O) * O) * O) C) 'CO WWWW * W M. W * WWWW * W WW W W W W * W * 4.) * CJ X. W X (0 NNNN * N * N * NNNN * NNNNNNN * r * r * r * r m r CC C)0 * A * r * rrrr * 0000000 * CO * 0 * C) * O) C) AAAA * r1 * v * rrrr * AAAAAAA * N * (0 * DO * O X C) z -i O < 0 (' 0000 0 0 0000 0000000 O O o o D rn 0000 O) C) 0000 0)0)0)0)0)0)0) O) O) O) O) -1 CO \\\\ \ \ \\\\ \\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ m 2 ✓rrr r r rrrr r r r r D NNNN N N NNNN N N N N N N N N N N NJ X \\\\ \ \ \\\\ \\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ 0 WWWW CO (D WWWW (0(0(0(0(0(0(0 (D CO (D (0 -11 rrrr r r rrrr r r r r m IM D X 0 C Z r r r r WW ())0 -1 NV W 0($1 WW Arrr 042.0 rrr 00 (0(0 vV r0A O)(0 WW AA N r rr Co 000)N NA)(0 0000 (7)V) C)00 00 rVrN(0 0000 00 NWNA( CN0(OAC0W(0 NN 00 NN 00 r0N0(0 -1V 00 0)C)CN0 0)0)0(0 N CD C00 NV) 00 WW 00 * * * * * * * * * XXXX rr = SSSS 22x222= G) G) f1 m C-1--I--f- m mmmm DDDDnDD D CO m X M1-c1-11-1 0 Z ZZZz aaMaMXIz Moo m m zzzz Z zzzz 33333X3 0 A 0 A 0000 0 m mmmm 0000000 z C < mmmm Z ZZZz zZZz z zZ m )-( X) --1 m rrrr 0000 0000(0000 XI Z I-1 0 Z 2=22 m 0 -A Z 0 CCCC r rrr(`-+r. 22=2222 W m rn 0 -(-4-1-4 m 0C)0)0 0000000 M M NNNN C) 0000 EEEEEEE 0 C) 1'•+ C) mmrn mrn R1M CO 0 Z = WWWW 1-1 Z C) rn 0000 Z) a X C OC)00 0 r z 0000) Cl) m -1-1-4-1 G) ). 73X173,3 rr t CO . -4 rn XI WWWW m m mmmm mmW(nV)CC 0 M 0 0 r rrrr 0 0 0000 001CCCC C XI —1 0000 C C CCCC CCommmm 0 0 m 0 m 0000 H M 1-41.-ii 1-41-COMMM-0 M -0 T X - M -MMM M-0 rrrr C) r =XX 3MM1-4N X (n rl CO 0 DDDD X 3 XXX' zz>rnmmm 0 m m m m 1-4P-14.4 D D DDDD >D(--I N CA NC W CO M Cl) zzzz rl N Hrlrlr NMZ m < < C) -4-4-4-I Z Z zzzz 22-4 'Ti m -( -4 -4-4-4-4 -4-4 0 r1 -4 r-( 0 Z 0000 0 0 0000 0000000 00 0 0 0 > rrrr r r rrrr rrr r r r r A r r I- A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C) AAAA A A AAAA A A A A A A A N A A A 0 NNNN N N NNNN N N N N N N N W W N W C WWWW W W WWWW W W W r r r r 0 r r r Z 0000 N N NNNN N N 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 -I I l t l I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Wrrr O) A CAAW 0)WO)WAWW O A O) W Z r000000 A N WANW NNWNNrr 0 N r r 0 rANr r V OrCr (DrOAr CON 0 r r r 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 Wrrr O) A 0)AAW 0WO)0)AWW 0 A O) W 1.1 1-.000 A N NANW NNNNNrr 0 N r r Z < (0 00 W r W W 00 W 0 A (0 O) O) V W ft 0 W A A 0 N O) 0 0 W M 1 v • r 0 N) 1 W * r I - m v 0 D * * N. * * * * * (n G) * * * * * * * * D rn * * * * * * * * 0 I t I I I 1 I 1 m C) C) C) 0 C) C) C) C) X X X x X 7C X CO CO CO N CO 0 CO V) W rrr * r Nr * 1—r * r r * r * r—rr r * r * r * r O)C)C) * O) MM * MO * C) C) * C) * 0)C)O)O) O) * C) * M * 0 .(0 W W W * . w WW * WW * W W * W * W W W W W * W * W * S CO WWW * W WW * WC) * w W * N * NNNN N * N * N * m )- www * w wW * 00 * O 0 * CD * 00000000 00 * 00 * V * C) V V V * N 1-r * MO * r 0 * 00 * 00000000 V * A * W * x C) M z O < O 0 000 0 00 00 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 D C1 M O) C) MM MM C) C) C) O)O)C)M C) C1 0) -4 N \\\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ m x rrr r 1-r 1-r r r r rrrr r r r D N N N N NN NN N N N N N N N N N N x \\\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ 0 (0(0(0 CO WW WW CO CO 0 0000 0 CD 0 M rrr r r1- 1-r r r r rrrr r r r m M D 3 0 mo.. C . _ _ z 40AA 0000 WW V O 0:54s, 1 A W AA AW WA(0 AA NN NN W000 AA NN )WA AA ONV COACT 0)C) WW 0000 AC0C00 C) VV NN VV MOV NN 0C0N 000 00 AA U'CJ' (OWA00 WW WW 1-r VON NN rr0 000 00 VV 00 0)0)000 NN 00 WW * * * * * * * * * * 333 z 33 C-1- r A r rrrr r r 0 MMM 1 MM 00 0 C 0 DDDD > D m Z2Z M Z2 ZZ A N G) 1111 2 CA 2 2ZZ ZZ 00 > N m SS22 0 0 Z mmm 0 r m D AAAA A ►-4 < 000 M CSC) 1-r r M 0000 m CO m DDD N 00 DD C r CO mmmm 0 m z woo -4 33 �� z C C)C)0 ;x mm M r S mm-m M r A 0 000 0 0 > 0 D D D R m D D A M M M 3 -4 'Ti C) 00 z .0.4. m m zzzz m M -i I 7OCm s m N -41-41 z 0 00 w z 1 z C) N C) MMMM N x 0 m ZZZZ C)C)C)C) M A zm i 0 0 ;. 1-4 N 1 m A CCC m MM C)C) A V C) mO00 m M -1 M -4.4-4 O 77= D D m A 01-CC .O z A -i MMM C 00 mm 3 D 0 CO= - C 0 D m rrr M 'I.T1 MM M < M G)-Ti-0 M .11 < X MMM 73 1-0 1 m 0 - Ar - m 111 NN DD r x I01+ CO r 0 MMM 3 mm 1-1- C 0 l>mm 3 m m mmm D AA Z f?* DM co D A Q. N CO 00 M << MM M A M Z I M < 0 Z 00 0 N T1 213* Z N A -4 CC Z C 0 1 -I -4 C M M M CO CA -M 0 N CO -4 C M M M M N CO 0 N 1 -I Z 000 0 00 00 00 0 00 0000 0 0 0 D ✓rr or 1-r 11- r r A rrrr r r r C) t l1 I I I Ii ) 1 C) AAA A AA AA A A N AAAA A A A 0 WWW N WW WW CO W W NNNN N W W C -.1.-4,1 W 1 .1.... 1-r N W 0 (4(41-'r W r W Z 000 N 00 1-r A 0 N N000 N 0 0 1 I ) I i t I I 1 I I I I1 I (4,-I- A w1- CTA 0 W 0 0)W AC) A r r 2 x0000 A 1-N NN 0 r 0 NrNW A N N 0 ✓Nr I- 1-r 1-r 0 W 0 COrVO r r rI - Wrr A (Jr CMA 0 W 0 O)WAC) A r r M 1-0000 A 1-N NN 0 r 0 NrNN A N N Z < 00 r 00 O O) 00 s 0 W V C) CO 71 I • r 0 N ) CO as r I m - N D * * * * * * * * N 0 * * * * * * * * D m * * * * * * * G) 1 I i I � I i m C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) x x x x x x x x CO 0 Cl) CO 0 0 0 0 A * M * M * * r . rrr r * r * r 0000)00 * 0 * O) * C)0)0)O C) * 0) * 000) O) * 0) * 0001010 C) -cO . (4(4(4 W(4 W * W * w * W WWW W * W * W W W W * W * W WWW W Z (0 W(JwwwW * W * W * WWWWW * W * www W * w * wWWWw m r (0(0(0(0(0(0 * CO * V * 0)0)01 0)0) * 0) * A A A A * W * (4(4 W W W C) 000000 * V * Co * (0(0(0(0(0 * N * 0)C)C) 0 * (0 * V V V V V X C) M Z -( 0 -< . 0 0 000000 0 0 00000 0 000 0 0 00000 D 0)0)00)0)0) 0 01 0)000)0 01 000 0) 0 0)0)010)0 1 N \\\\\\ \ \ \\\\\ \ \\\ \ \ \\\\\ m 2 M r M )Mr M r D N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 7 \\\\\\ \ \ \\\\\ \ \\\ \ \ \\\\\ 0 (0(0(0(0(0(0 (O (0 (0(0(0(0(0 (0 (0(0(0 (0 (0 (0(0(0(0(0 M - r r rrr r r m M D 3 rr 0 r AA NN C z V N W W W N N NN AA Mr N V..4 N N rr w r -i 0-401-01-4 (11(11 rr NOV1N(00 (0(O O rA (110 1-M Co NV(00 rv(1400NO VV 00 -4(31(31A00 rr 0 NV VV NN AA0AW00 wn.) 00-410 NN AA VOrVA0 AA NVNW 00 00 m0NrWO 0000000 OM) (31(1 OOONLM-0 00 (OOoor 00 00 Nw0(OC(O * * * * * * * * * zZZZZz Z Z 33333 3 333 3 3 33333 000000 D ZZZZZ < 000 171 Z MMMMM ««« r (n -1-(-i -4 ZZZZZ DDDDDD r -4 0C)C)C)C) 0 000 A A ZZZZZ 777777 D 00000 D AAA 0 r mmmmm < 1 1 1 1 1 1 CO A ZZZZZ CO C C)C)C)C)C) m m.*1mmm.1 C) EEEEE vvo N 3 DDDDD z rrrrrr 2 1- DDDDD C) DDD D W NNNNN 0 mmmmmm C -<--«-< 0 AAA r C)C)C)C)C) 0 C)C)C)C)C)C) ( A -4-4-4 m lift 00000 A 777777 C '1 MM-1171M NNN CO C) 0) MMMMM 2 = M A AAA A M m m N Z mmmmm Z D C) m C) C) -1 7 A < A m t, 0 F- N -4m A C)C)AC)C)C) C m m(WWN 3 mmm Co 00 CCCCC --( -1 0 OrrrC 0 CCC C r -4-4-4-+-i -4 000000 M C CDQ0A 1 CCC m 0 MMMMM m r M MO C)0 v 0 MMM v 0 rrrrr 1 0000C)C) M - m r A mmm r MMMMM 222222 --( 3331- M 3 -4-11--4-4 0 C)C)C)C)CC) 1- 1 3aDDm '1 333 m D MMMMM m m D DMMMN C >>> N M mmmmm N AAAAA= (0 M MZZZ m MMM Z NNNNN C) .11'1'1 m'i'1 Z Z-4-4-4 r Z Z Z -4 A 000000 -+ 1- -4M-1 1-1 M -1 M 0 z 000)000)000) r 0 00000 0 000 0 0 00000 D =AAAAA A M r 1•r-1-. M r C) 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I III 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 C) N N N N N N A A 0.0.0.0.0. A AAA A A 0.00.00 0 WWWWW W W N N NNN N N N N N N N WWWWW C 000000 V W w w W w r N W w w 1- w -4-4-4-4-.1 Z N N N N N N 0 N N 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 0 00000 -( 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 000000 r A WW...1-W A WMA W A OOOA( Z 000000 A A NA0o00N A Nr0 r N ANrNN 0 000000 N r 1_I-(41-I. r Or r r r r N r M r • 1 1 1 1 1 ) I 1 Mil I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 000000 r A (90 r r W A O O A W A 010/MAW M 000000 A A NA00oN A NrA M N ANMNN Z 000000)000 r A N f0 (0(0(00)0)40 0 (11 Wr ON V100)N 0 N 00 0 * 0 (900WO3vNWr A r 00 NJ O 0 V V M I 0) • 1." O N I 40 >r r I 3 m V CO D * * * * * * * N C) * * * * * * * D m ) I 1 I 1 1 1 m C) C) 0 C) f) C) C) 7 X 7 7 X 7 7 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CP * )-„1•- * F- * -- * F.f- * r * r * 0-.1-4. * r * r * r * r * C)CT * C) * Co * C)C) * C) * C) * C)0) * C) * C) * C) * C) CO * W W * W * W * Co.)W * W * W * W W * Co.) * Co.) * W * 2 CO * AA * A * A * AA * A * A * AA * A * A * W * ru f-- * V V * V * C) * C)C) * U) * ffl * A A * CO * NJ * CO * C) * CD CO * A * CD * r r * V * UI * U14/1 * 0 * U) * W * 7C C) M z -C 0 < 0 0 ') 00 0 0 '00 0 0 00 0 0 0 D C)C) C) C) C)C) 0) C) C)C) C) Of C) -4 V) �� �� �� ru 2 ►-r r r rr r r o-o-• r r r D NN N NJ NN NJ NJ NN NJ N NJ 7C \\ - \ \\ \ \ \\ \ . \ 0 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO (D 13 I..-p.- r- r r I- r F-- r r r r r m m > r r 3 U)rw 0 03(04,1 C0 0o C - . - z CO 00 I- 1.1•• rr l•-•F. ) -C CO W U) 00 AA AA NU) C.) W 1--r CO CO WW NA co NN NN co 0 C U)U' VV (DW C) NN U)U) rr C101 r U)U) COW CD 03 0 CO CO C)C) CO CdA 00 00 AA CO C.)C) 00 U)U) WV C) WW 00 NV U) 00 00 VV * * * * * * * * * * 2:1 Al z 73 XI 73 73 -9v 13 "13 Z « 0 0 mm > m 00 ru > > DD r 0 << 0 > NV) > - - z z r > z z ro r )N)-4 X1 z D 1-1 C) 00 0 -(-C N -4 < C)C) z x r r G) P.41-1 0 - > m 00 N 00 Cn ru << Z z C Z z C7) (nCn 2 3 M 0 -1 0 0 70- 77 0M -4 E C) > 1-(H r- C 0 z D D r rn rn rn 7C E 3 3 0 Z v C) 00 z t-1- > DD a r > S -)-I C) -13 0 0 > 73 0 C) )-•) rr A rn NM 0 X1 MM 0 rum (n 3 -C C) Z Z 1--4 Z Z A N N CI) -4 ►-( N 7C 0 0 N 0 0 (D CA - m Of m a N.11-4 N 0 0 ru ( Z Z C) C A0 N C-( CA -4m X) 00 3 0) mN N CA -0 V) U) CO in 1-1 -(-I 0 r 0C C C 7:1C C r 4) -4 22 -4 0 Cv v v 0v v 0 C m ru m 0 C) I-. v "0 1111 13 0 rr 3 7373 73 yr r r r r 3 H M 1-4 CA)-I ra 3 0 r+.-+ -*) > I ru m rn m m m D 3 m 3 3 C '--I D C) (n V) A N N 1-+ D N -0 rO m z rr < Z - C) 7373 r -4 Z -I Z 73 0 0 -C -1 v M 0 Z Co)W 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 > r1-• r -. rr r r rr r r- r C) 1 1 1 1 C C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C) AA A A AA A A AA A A A 0 U)U) NJ N NN NJ NJ WN NJ NJ NJ C rr NJ W C4 1-. I-. r 4-o 1-o r W W Z CO CD N 0 N0 0 0 00 0 0 N -4 U)U) A r A A r C) W W 01 C) W Z COV A co AA N A I Co) CP r NJ 0 -NJ r r I-.4-.. C) r rr- r r r I I I I ) I I I C I I I I A A A r A A r C) W W C) C) 0 F..( 1-44 0-. A W AA N A rW N r NJ Z < NJ CO NJ CO W 0 It 0 W V C) N V I r 0 N ( CO Yt r i 3 I11 •v CA > * * * * * * * * * * * N G) * * * * * * * * * * * > ru * * * * * * * * * * * 0 I I I I I I $ I I 1 m C) C) C) C) 0 A A C) C) C) C) * N N N N CO V) N N N N (7) * r * * rrrr * I- * r r C)C)000000 * C) * C)00 C)00)0 O)0 C)000000 C) * 0000) * 0 * 0 C) -0 W W W W W W W W * W * (4(4 W W W W W W W (4(4 W W W W W W * W W W W * W * W 2 CO N N N N N N N N * N * N NNNN VIN N N N N N N N N N N * N N N N * A * A rn 1- * * r * 000000000 00000000 * 0000 * (0 • 00 C) -.4-4..4,4.-..1,4,4,4 * N * 000000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 * NNNN * N * (0 7C A H z 1 0 < 0r'' 0 m s 00000000 0 000000000 00000000 0000 0 0 D (0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) C) -4 CO \\\\\\\\ \ \\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\ \ \ m 2 ✓ )... ...1-.1-. r I A N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NNNN N NJ 7< \\\\\\\\ \ \\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\ \ \ 0 (00(060(0(0(0 (O 000000000 00000000 (0(0(0(0 (O (0 M ✓ r r r r r r rn m A z 0 r r NN C - - Z NNN NNWW 00 r W V N r N r 00 1 r00A0AWr NN WAVAAArAAV NVCfIAA000A0 0 rrV NN NN VAONONNO 00 NW00WWWNWWV 1-.0VWWW)...W 0 (0(1DNrN 00 00 0000VNN00 AA NAOAAA0AA0 000000VV1•-0 0V0Aco 00 NN 1...NANV00o0 AA 0o0N0000000 A00A0000C)C)NN AW000 00 NN * * * * * * CO N N N N N N N CO 000000000 NNNNNNNN 0000 CO CO 'Cmmimmm'C'O - 222222222 00000000 2222 A C) C C C C C C C C CO AAAAAAAAA C C C C C C C C >>.» 0 0 00)000)0)0) x7<7C 7<7C7<7<7<7C 111111-4-4 xxxx 1 -( O 000000000 22222222 0000 -i 1 < 0MMMMMMMMM ££££££££ -vv- m mrnmmmmmmm mmmmmmmm mmmm C) 0 Z M mmmmmmrIlmm NNNNNNNN mmmm -4 1 0 A -4-4-4-4-4-4-4-1 < •< 0 Z NNNNCnCNNN rnrn-*)•r 7D 1-I mrnmmmmmmrn NNNNNNNN 0000 A C) m .'O.'Vxim===7oW CCCCCCCC ==== m co 2 CO <<<<<<<<< WWWWWWWW 0000 m N rn •-40.44-44-41..41-11-4.4.4 C C C C C C C C C) C) 0)0000000)0) 7070m==70=A 0 )-4 7< mmmmmmmmm WWWWWWWW 70 Z NCU)0CC000N0 AAAAAA>> 0 0 73 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z m m 701 0 i i 1r .. CO 1 RI 00000000 CO 00cc0000M MMVMo-u-u-u mmmm r v ►+ 111-4-1111 r 11111-4--1170 7t)7o.'7MXI>,Mz 0000 m C 1 0 MMNh(MIM MMO MMI-MM001-41'4 CCCC 0 = m rrrrrrrr G) rrrrrrrrrn zZZZZZZZ 1-(1-(1-4 -( > 0 3 ...41-4..... -1-1-4-400-1-4 0000 r = 11111111 3 111111-410 11 A 0 MN►r 1-1NM►rr-I A 12012*1Nfia1•1 F-1 R° 3333 rn CO m mmmmmm mm 1-4 mm mm mm mmAI 00 rrr+i-i - m CO 00000000 Z NNNNNNNN< M M V'V Z Z 0 D AAAA r A 1 00000000 Z Z Z Z Iv 0 39 WWWW CAW 1111 Z '1 I-4 G) v W 1 -n r N m 0 0 m C) Z CO 00000000 0 000000000 0 WWW►-r 0 0 0000 O N A ✓ C)r rrAArr 1-.1-61-.1.-. r r 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 ) 1 1 1 1 1 I I 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A AAAA A A 0 W W W W W W W W N WWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWW NNNN W N C VVVVVVVV W VVVVVVVVr NUNNrrUN WWWW r 0 Z 00000000 0 000000000 0000(0(000 NNNN 0 00 -4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OAAWWWrr r 0 0 A W W r r r( 00001-1-.CJ1-. A A W W r N Z 1-.NNNNr0000 00 WNNNr000000W V00000AA0-.C9 ANrr W I- 0 ......N r A 0 r r r r A N r I- VCT A W W N r r r 0 N r A N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i OAAWWW►-I- r 00AWW1-1-.1-.W AAAArrWr AAWW r N 1--1 0-.NNrN1-.WW 00 NNNNr000000W rrrt-AArW ANrr W r Z < W V V 0 0 0) 0) 0 -a I • r 0 N I CO Mt r j 3 RI - N A * * * * * CO 0 * * * * * > rn * * * * * G) I 1 1 1 1 m C) C) C) 0 0 N C/) 0 N 0 V A r * r * r * r A r * 4-•rr r rr r 000000000000 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 A 00000 0 A 000000 C) co W W W W W W W W W W W W * W * W * W * W * (4(4(4(4 W W * W W W W W W = (D 000000000000 A U1 * U7 * U1 * 0 * 00000 0 A 000 000 m I- 000000000000000000000000 * V * A A N A N * NNNNN r * G) A V * U1 * A * N * 00000 (O * *.-1--4-4-.4-.4.-4 X C) M Z 1 O -< O 0 ! ' 000000000000 0 0 0 0 00000 0 000000 D 000000000000) 0 0 0 0 00000 0 000000 -4 N \\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ \ \\\\\\ m x ✓ r r r r D N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NNNNN N N N N N N N X \\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ \ \\\\\\ O (0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0 (0 (0 CO (0 (0(0(0(0(0 (D (0(0(0(0(0(0 ✓ r r r r m M D 3 r 0 F„ Wr0 C - - - Z 01-.4-. r0r r rr WW NN r WVaoN N -1 (000000A0U1r A.NWWO rr NN (1101 00 NrrrWA NN V000400-4 000AArVVArVVOW 00 0001 00 00 NOo00NrN 00 U100VOOW0 r4-.0Ar(000Nr0rr00 00 00 0000 00 000W0AU1 VV v00-4AVA NNVN0(0VN0(0rW0 00 00 00 00 000000 0101 000(3100(110) A. * * * * * A * CCCCCCCCCCCC C N U) U) U)000(/1 1 U)U)U)UU) Z -4 = -1-1-1-1-1 0 M M V M M M 000000000000 N > 73 D >>>>> 3 CCCCCC v m X 73z,37373 C)C)C)C)C)C) ££££££££££££ 1 1-+ O XXXXX N < mmmmmmmmmmmm -0 0 0 M 00000 1 m Cn(NC/)(N(nC/)CN(N(n(A(A(n 0 Z = m m Z 1111-11111111 N m m C)C)C)nn 1-1 0 0000000000001 0 0) 1 mmmmm 1Z( 73 000000000000 D 0 2 3"."1. Z C) 333333333333 N r Zzzzz 0 = 333333333333 1 u) - m m m C) G) 00000 X 0 73 z -0 m C) Z M • N 1 m z -411111111111 -0 N N -0 CA CACCCA -( ££CCCC '- mm4 m m m m m m m m m m 0 C C 73 1-1-1--1--1- W DD-1-1-1-1 1 1--r-f-1-1-1-'1-1-f-1- N v -0 0 00000 D -4-11-11-11-1r m mm mm mmmf*tmmmm -4 V v m 00C)C)C) < mmr-rrrr 1 MTIMMvv'C'C'Cvvv D r r 1 M731-iF-INF-1 ___________= C) 1-. 1•-1 N 11111 r 1111 0 000000000000 m m m m DDDDD 3C)11F-(NF-4 m ZZZZZZZZZZZZ Cl) N xi MMMrM-1 Q. mOmmmm & mmmmmmmmmmmm < ZZZZZ 1Z0000 C) 11111 N MZ >, C MM rr CA on m N 1 1 1-+ N 1-( u) 0 -1 Z 000000000000 0 0 0 0 00000 0 00000000 D ✓ r r r r WWrrrr C) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A AAA A A (4(4 A A A A 0 WWWWWWWWWWWW W N N W NNNNN W 0000W WCJW C N N N N N N N N N N N N N r r r WWWWW W WW-.4...4,1s4 Z r rrr rrr 4--I-r r 0 O 0 O 00000 O w4-0000 -4 1 1 1 1 1 it 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 A A W W W...... W A W W 01(4 r r r W 000000 Z ANrWNr00 V0U1WN I- A r r WN000000 r 00NNNN 0 F-. r r r 0r0.N1-. r 00000N/... • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 O A A W W W...... W A W W 01(Jrrr W 000000 1-4 ANrWNrW V0 U14N r A r r NN00000) r OONNNN 1 < It 0 0) -0 I r O f") CO it r i. X -0 U) D * * * * * * (/) 0 * * * * * * > m * * * * * * 0 1 1 1 1 1 m 0 C) C) C) C) C) X 7C X X X 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 rrrr r r r r r r r r * * rr-)-- * 1- * r C)C)C)C) C) C) a) C) C) C) C) C) * C)C)C)C)C)C)C) * C)C)C) * C) * 0 '(D WWW W W W W W W W W W * (4(4 W W W W W * W W W * W * S (0 0000 0o Oo 00 00 00 Oa 00 03 00 00 * 0)O)C)C)O)C)C) * C)C)C) * V) * m r 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * WWWWWWW * W W W * (0 * C) 00000000 V C) 0 A W N r 0 * VVVVVVV * 000 * A * T. C) M Z -( 0 < 0 0 T 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 000 0 D C)C)0)C) M C) 0) W C) 0) 0) C) 0)0)0)M C)01 C) C)0)O) 0) -I 0 \\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\ \\\ \ m 2 rrrr r r r r r r r r rrr r D N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N X \\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\ \\\ \ 0 (0(0(0(0 CO (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 CO (0(0(0(0(0(0(0 (0(0(0 (0 V rrrr r r r r r r r r rrr r m rn > 2 A W 0 0O C) rr rr rr A C) C z W0)0)00( rr NN WC) r 0AOW rr -1 00000 NN 0)C) WW 00 00 rr 0000 VV N r0)r r V03 AA 00 00000 VV 00 00 00 NN 00 rr 00 Wr10U,IWNO) AUINU) 00 00000 Vv 00 0303 00 NN WW WW 0)O) rANA00r0V WVI(0(0 00 00000 00 00 WW 00 00 UIVI WW 0000 0(033 A(00N(0 OONW 00 * * * * * * * * * * * * 4ccLIC. r m a 0 0 0 > D ««-c« ZZZ < DDDD M r D 0 m > r -I >>>>>>> DDD D 0000 Z m < .71 r < 07 ======= 000 r ---0.v 0 C) (n M M M R. GCCCCCC MM-I I- mmmm CC m m > 0 z 000000(0 mmrn m < 7D=70= m N 73 -< 0 --I 0000000 < m (n(n(na) z < r- '*) 0 0 0000000 333 z 0 0 > Rft M > Z 0000000 ZZZ 0 --4-OI-I-I 0 D Z '0 E m Z 2222225 >>> 0 7/ XIMMM Z 0 2 73 > 0000000 000 '3 0 mmmm m o m r( 0 M Z�EZE�Z mmm M m m m m m X X z --I r- 0 3 X 2 0 C)C)C)C)C)C)C) MMM 0 1"u-rr 0 > m (A 0000000 ZZZ >>>> D r( < 0 -4MM >o 0000 CZ) AO m W M XI VVVM -4 m -I '0 m M N N 00000000 CCV 0 rr XIMMXI =I 0 XI 7, 0 m C C rCCCCCC 117, C m m v '9 OMV VMMV MMO 0000 mMMm < s.-4m Om ►G-I G V V 0-0-0M-OVM 1-1---01-* 2 M v r V 0 r r DC-1"1"1"1" 0000 r 0 m 1-4 M SC)MMMMM 1-10 M 0 Drn m Drnmmmrnm r1-IM m rn m m m m 2 Q0 = 0 0> n M 0 0(/)0)0 mN0 <<<< Ii 0 < M ►-I ZX < C) A 0 Z C Z > M C -4 W -4 17 5- 0 F-I = -4M M 0 -t, t-4 u) -I 0 Z -4 -.4.-41...0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0000000 000 0 D WrU)r r r r VI r r r r rrr r C) Ill 81 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I C) AAAA A A A A A W A A AAC•AAAA AAA A 0 W WWW W N W W N 0) N N N N N N N N N WWW N C rrrr W W W r W VI r r W VVI r Z 0000 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 0 0000000 000 0 -4 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I vvrr r W W r 0) 0 A W 0)AC)A(4(4(4 vvr 0) Z (440(1 V N r (0 r 0 r r WNNrrrr INN-4 N 0 I.. 1-r N r r N r 00 0 r N 041-5-'W N r r r w A 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I Shill l I I I I vvrr r W W r 0) 0 A W 0)AC)AWWW vvr D) M Wr(00 V r I- (0 r 0 r r NNNrrrr NNV N Z OC 0 0) V I • r 0 N I 1* r X M v 0 > * * * * > * * * * * * 0 1 m I C) C) C) C) 0 07 7 (0 0 0 0 0 M r r r r r r r r F. r r r r rr r r r r CO CO C) C) 0) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) CA C) C)CA CA O) C) C) Co' W W . W W W W W w W CO W W W W W W W W W S CO Co Co Co co Co co co co co co 0o co Co co CO co co co co m r N N N Na NJ N Na r r r r r r F. rr )- r O C) C) Cif A W N r 0 CO 00 V C) CP A W N NJ r O CO 7; 0 '-C Z -4 0 -< 0 0 rn o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 o a C) C) Of C) C) Of C) C) C) C) C) C) Of C) C)C) C) C) 0) -i N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - \ - \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ m S r r r r r r r r r r r r r r ►-r r r r D NJ N NJ N N Na N NJ N N N N NJ N NW N N N X \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ 0 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO WW CO (O CO M r r r r r r r r r r r r r r rr r r r m m I. 3 WW 0 ►-r rr Co CO rr WW C z NN MM U1CII COLO rr MO WW VV CAOV1 C)Cf WW -I C)C) 00 00 Co CO NN WW C)CA WW AA C)CA NN NN rr 00 AC)C 00 C)) CAC) WW 00 00 WW C)CA 0000 VIVI AA 00 00 UUI C)C 0000 WW ArW 00 00 00 NN 00 00 AA C00 rr 00 0000 00 00 00 0000 00 AA VoV 00 00 00 00 00 00 rr AA NN 00 0U0 00 00 00 NN 00 CO CO 000 00 00 00 * * * * * * * * * x * x * x x * * * V) N N N N 7, 77 Z 1 1 C) X) A 7 7:7: 7: 7: C.+ ►r > S -I S I-I 0 z Z r > 0 rn 00 > C) > m C) D > m < Z N m I- 0 Z 77: C.., S N X N 7: r- 7J I N -4 M M Z Z Mm )-C 7: D8 0 m I r D > 0 A = r m 00 3 m < z 0 m rr z < c •-4Cj m r- m 0 S S > a m z < rn 3 > -1 1-4 0 xl 0 m N r 0 0 Z r 0 Z m a m Z 7: -I Z m 0 0 0 C D r m C) Z z N N m > � < a Z C Co C) I- < I- > m 0 0 m Z A 0 S N Z S r m -C C) m Z ►-1 N Z 0 m I-- 0 Z N0 C I.4 < N1-1 CA xi M Z N 0 0 m N N > O :. r ., _ N m 7, O 13 m m N m C) C) 0 N N m NO 0 - 0 ,-1 0 0 0 C C C .0 v 0 0 C f 1.4 c CC 0 0 0 m .1 -*1 IN - 13 I-I 4-I 1,1 '1 N rn 3 H 111-13 0 v v r -0 -I M D Dr" C) 0 0 3 S N N '-I > N 2. QI r C)r S -1 = 0 C) m m PO X< D I N> r A> N 4,1 N A MM O N C) m A < < r 4-4 1-4 m 3 73 0 70 C0 m z Z Z 0 < S CO < 0 Z > rn N '*1 m 0 -4 -4 -1 C 0 C) C) N -1 -4 0 0 1 M r M S -4 N M C) fy 13 0 --1 A Z 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 0 00 CO r Co D A r r r r r r r r r r r r r MM A A A A I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I C) NJ A A A A A A A A A A W W A A A N A N 0 W W W N N N N CT W W CO C) of NJ NN W W W C 0 I-- r W W r W r r CO CO VI A G) rr 0 r 0 Z N) 0 0 N N 0 N r 0 0 r r N N UI 0 N CO NJ -I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 4 I 0 I- C) A A W W A W C.) r 0 0 A OM 0 r 0 Z 0 V UI A N r r N r r W 0 0 A AA 0 A 0 0 O 0o r r C N w r r r r 0 0 r rr 0 N 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 0 r of . A W C.) A W W r 0 0 A Mm 0 r 0 )-I 0 V N A NJ r r N r r W 0 0 A AA 0 A 0 Z CO N W A C.) N A UI V CO00 VI r O r CO NCoN coao V as I- A COC.) V r xk 0 F" V N r VI CO W N co C) VI M I N • r 0 N tC !R r I m -13 D N G) D rn C) m ,- 0 0 * 1+1+1+1+ * r r r r r • * 0)0)0)0) * co 0 C) 0 n co' * AAAA * W w w W = <O * 4:.4:—(04:. * 00 00 0o 00 m r * AAAA * W N N N C) * U1 U)UI U1 * 0 <0 00 v x C) I z --1 0 < O• 0 (_ 0000 0 0 0 o > . 0)010)0) Cl C) Cl 0 -4 N \\\\ \ \ \ \ m = .... r r r r D NNNN N N N N 7: \\\\ \ \ \ \ 0 (0(0(0(0 <0 <D <0 <D M r r r r r r r r m M D W r r 3 A r Or 1+w 0 <G MO <D UI N N A C) Z r. 0)UI000)0) C)100C)r UI U1 -4 O h)004.0Av0ovU)UIC)0 ww <0(0 NN 1+r Ir a) r000v0VC)00006.) WW001 00 00 ww ww VI WUt00N000NOVA OwwAA 00 AA vv 1+r w 0000Ut004DUIU100o( Ovvww 00 ww UIUI 00 I 1 * * * * * mommm C. C.I -i N -4 0000 m m m 1 0 f1 it'1m-41 T1-1-11 NNNN m 23 0 D -1 CCCCCCCCCCCC 4-41-I4-41-4 i 70 0 7 > ZZZZZZZZZZZZ -4-4-4-1 -< < Z 0 < r vvvvvovvvvvv «« E Z C) m Z 000000v.l 0)WNNrr O mmmm m D 0 m 0 Awr w1+C)r w1 UiAr f) 3 r 0 MNMH 7\X - m 0 .M -4-1-4-4-4-1-1 3333 3 D D c) 000000000000 >>>> D A 0 X = -4-1-4-1-1-1-4-4-4-4-4-1 0000 z 1 m m m >>>>>>>>>>>> mmmm z 77 C) <N<AU)U) -4 < m m m I m (.. 0 N --1 m mCmCNrroOs-40 mmoo N N N N 4-4 0-I3*-4mcc0Dmmm =Sac C m C C -.1 0.«OZaoCOCVDDz 00mm m E v v m mr=mm(cr--1. zm 'Immm v P1 m v 3 Q0-401= =-1 N0 4 1+ r a r r -11+ 1+r l-1 D i-43* N U)-I-. 1-4 I•, 1 1+ 0 <r0T33=r -41- mmmm m </) m m m CMI- =MOO N ( N CI) -4-1>Z I M<4-4 '*1 << MMI-1000 3 C < C) CCZ 'v<0M Z 4-4 00> m<M1 0 A V -1-1C) 14::) I -4 M OM<. DM N C) 0 C MOM = Z —1 . OM m F, z 0 1- -1 r -4 V -< 0 0000 0 v 0 0 D rrrr r r r r n iii 1 I I I n AAAA A W A A 0 WWNN N Cl N N C rrrr r UI r r Z 0000 0 r 0 0 -1 1111 I I I I WWW W 0) 0 0) A Z r4WW N 0 A r 0 rrrr N 0 r r 1 1 1 1 I I I I wWWW 0 0 o) A ., rrww N 0 A r < UI w r w w r as 0 <O C) C) 0 M 1 v • ,-- 0 O N , 0 r 3 M -0 0 D * * D m M A n N N r CO wW 0000000 1-3 -4 co co op OD OD CO CO OD 0 c7 x H 1-' I-, HNNHHH' N H1-' H H H H H I-, 1-, H H' (D 0 ." - - 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4 w 4' -P--- •P" • 4:- 4 4' 4" •fi" �. y \O N N N N N N w N w OD 4 \O \O VD \JD \D \O \O w 0. = N HHHHH' NHwN wH' N N W N W NNN \O \1n 00000NON0 wH-' W -1 W H H ODNO 0 a O \ ' H-' 4'N w H-' O -4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H n n \n H H- 0 OO-JCONNNNNW OI-' 0 0 0 0 0 000 N 0. O \nNH-' OSI-' I-' O\NI OH 0 0 0 0 0 000 H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 4' 4 H-• H-' H-, 4 H-' W 1-' O -4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H O H-' H-' CDNNI-, NNW OH 0 0 0 0 0 000 N CD OO-lW 0 '17 OD WW 0000000 -J -4 OD OD OD OD CO CO OD CD 0 0 HHH-' H-, C H I-' NNH-, HHHH-' H-' HH H H H H H NNH-, H ,y I I 1 I t7 H HH' HI-' H-' NI , H-' H' HH H H H H H HH' N H O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a bCDNCD H H I-' H' H-' H-' H' H-' H-' H' H HH H H H H H I-' NN H n 120 £ \O CD O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '1 CD H-' (D 7a c+ 11 4 °11Hw � N ,oa H' 0 til H '1 '=7 Z a < : H a CD O\ H w \D \J-1W H -J CD B O \n n W (Awl H -4 H H \ -4 • ON(w\ I H H N OD 0 \O ON OD O\-4 N N z N 0 H -vi N) -J W w N 0 -4 W \n .\O O \n \n \n \n O\ON 0 0 CO\n 0 \n \n 0 H H 0 w 0 \n N ON 0 COO 000HO\O\OOw 00 0 \n 0 0 0 NON 0 c+ C) a =• n -EA' * 0 N w co co 7O = = = = CD 3 b L37 b CD CD W W 7J )) 7d 'U 7y 77 0 = Z (D f✓ O K .n O 9 G CD CD CD CD Cl) CD CD (D O Lb Cl) -4 a\ H a d c+ O G CO a 4-i a s a s a a a w 0 �• 'd O '-h r• c+ K r• H'• r• r• r• r• H. r• 'h '�Y 0 �] 0\H' Q\ c+ H F b P n CD c+ c+ c+ c+ ct c+ c+ c+ CO \n \n H \n C' CD '17 (• D 3 (ID (T c+ '-d t7 Cl) U) 'T1 3 '17 �7 O O\D �' m C 'K P� Lz7 CD 'Z7 H•+ P CD H i--I Cl)go a '-h CD C r• C 7O '-h 0 H cG fa, 0 H C) CO CD H c-+ N 'SDs P) N o 9 0 tz7 °q B P CD a ' n H. < Chi c-+ w wwwwwWWww wW co w w co co wwW w x o \n \n \n \n V'1 v1 \n VI \n \il \n \-n \n \n \il \n \i, \J-1 V1\n \n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ \O OD CD OD OD OD CD OD CD OD -4 -4 0\ Ui . W N H HJ H 0 o O rro1 H - CD tro=7 C%7 CD O - = = P OA (D c< a C/)C 3 B .o " a 0 .s M £ O O M P 3 2 HH (l) m Cs) W x Z x • CD c+ '°o 0 P (D CDP Cl)IH (OD CD m 0 -EA- H • H, Ow\ H-' OBD \D \n w H-' C\ a 3 LA) Cow 00 0 \O O\ OD D\ N c� 0\ -4 I-� N ON N O -J w v'i \n \n \n C\ \n H H O w O w 0 CO 0 VD 0 0 \n 0 0 0 0 ' ONSENT 11 CI MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Renewal of Licenses to Only Allow Consumption and Display of Intoxicating Liquor (Set-ups) DATE: June 14 , 1991 INTRODUCTION The following applicants have applied for a 1991-92 Set-up License. The applications are in order. Please approve. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the applications and grant a 1991-92 License to Only Allow Consumption and Display of Intoxicating Liquor to: 1) Charles W. Fuller 2400 East 4th Avenue 2) Fraternal Order of Eagles 220 West 2nd Avenue JSC/trw 3Oi\ SEIT MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator 401 FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Renewal of On Sale Wine Licenses DATE: June 14, 1991 INTRODUCTION Cedar Fair L.P. has applied for an 1991-92 On Sale Wine License. The application from Cedar Fair L.P. is in order. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the application and grant an On Sale Wine License to Cedar Fair L.P. , One Valleyfair Drive. JSC/trw i [ s-6. REVISED MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Renewal of Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor Licenses DATE: June 14 , 1991 INTRODUCTION: The following applicants have applied for a 1991-92 On and/or Off Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License. Staff has checked for delinquent property taxes and utility bills. The Building Inspector has advised me that all premises are in conformance with the City Code. All of the applications are in order for Council consideration, except for those that indicate table. These should be tabled unless they are in order by Tuesday. An update will be placed on the table. [The bowling alley (Kenneth D. Berg) is closed until August. ] ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the application(s) and grant an On Sale and/or Off Sale Non- Intoxicating Malt Liquor License to: Approve/ Table Applicant On-Sale Off-Sale Approve Jim & Lucy' s Inc. X 210 West 1st Avenue Table Kenneth D. Berg X 222 East 1st Avenue Approve Birch Bru, Inc. (SuperAmerica) X 1155 East 1st Avenue Approve Cedar Fair L.P. X One Valleyfair Drive Approve J.B.F. Inc. X DBA Jerry's Pizza of Shakopee 823 East 1st Avenue Approve Holiday Stationstores, Inc X 444 East 1st Avenue Approve Pizza Huts of the Northwest, Inc. X 257 Marschall Road Approve Retail Foods of Minnesota X a division of Gateway Foods, Inc. DBA Brooks Food Market #28 615 Marschall Road Approve/ Table Applicant On-Sale Off-Sale Approve Racing Promotions, Inc. X One Checkered Flag Blvd. Approve * • . les Ful. er X Delete 400 ast -th Ave e Approve Polka Dot Dairy, Inc. X Tom Thumb Food Markets, Inc. 590 South Marschall Road Approve Fraternal Order of Eagles #4120 X 220 West 2nd Avenue Approve Retail Foods of Minnesota X a division of Gateway Foods, Inc. DBA Brooks Food Market #42 1147 Canterbury Foods Approve Kee P. Suen DBA Family Chow Mein X 237 East 1st Avenue Approve Stonebrooke of Shakopee, Inc. X 2693 County Road 79 Table . ries I Piz . . , In . X Delete D:A Pizza N' Pas . (Not Renewing) 5: , Mars all Road Please Note: Previously Deleted (not renewing) Berens - Off Sale Something Italian - On Sale Pablos - went to a liquor license * Reapplying under name of The Shakopee Ballroom & Banquet Center Inc. for Council approval on 7-2-91. CONSENT MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Renewal of Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor Licenses DATE: June 14, 1991 INTRODUCTION: The following applicants have applied for a 1991-92 On and/or Off Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License. Staff has checked for delinquent property taxes and utility bills. The Building Inspector has advised me that all premises are in conformance with the City Code. All of the applications are in order for Council consideration, except for those that indicate table. These should be tabled unless they are in order by Tuesday. An update will be placed on the table. [The bowling alley (Kenneth D. Berg) is closed until August. ] ACTION REOUESTED: Approve the application(s) and grant an On Sale and/or Off Sale Non- Intoxicating Malt Liquor License to: Approve/ Table Applicant On-Sale Off-Sale Approve Jim & Lucy's Inc. X 210 West 1st Avenue Table Kenneth D. Berg X 222 East 1st Avenue Approve Birch Bru, Inc. (SuperAmerica) X 1155 East 1st Avenue Approve Cedar Fair L.P. X One Valleyfair Drive Approve J.B.F. Inc. X DBA Jerry's Pizza of Shakopee 823 East 1st Avenue Approve Holiday Stationstores, Inc X 444 East 1st Avenue Approve Pizza Huts of the Northwest, Inc. X 257 Marschall Road Approve Retail Foods of Minnesota X a division of Gateway Foods, Inc. DBA Brooks Food Market #28 615 Marschall Road Approve/ Table Applicant On-Sale Off-Sale Approve Racing Promotions, Inc. X One Checkered Flag Blvd. Approve Charles Fuller X 2400 East 4th Avenue Approve Polka Dot Dairy, Inc. X Tom Thumb Food Markets, Inc. 590 South Marschall Road Approve Fraternal Order of Eagles #4120 X 220 West 2nd Avenue Approve Retail Foods of Minnesota X a division of Gateway Foods, Inc. DBA Brooks Food Market #42 1147 Canterbury Foods Approve Kee P. Suen DBA Family Chow Mein X 237 East 1st Avenue Approve Stonebrooke of Shakopee, Inc. X 2693 County Road 79 Table Aries I Pizza, Inc. X DBA Pizza 'N' Pasta 584 Marschall Road CONSENT / 1 MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Renewal of Intoxicating Liquor Licenses DATE: June 14 , 1991 INTRODUCTION: The establishments listed below have submitted applications for their 1991-92 Liquor License(s) . Staff has checked for delinquent property taxes and utility bills. The building inspector has advised me that all premises are in conformance with the City Code. All applications are in order for Council consideration. C.R.E. Restaurant Company, the Shakopee House, is not renewing their licenses at this time. Delaying the renewal of the licenses for Turtle' s Bar & Grill, Inc. should not be a consideration at this time. The applicant is entitled to a hearing. At their regular meeting on June 4th, Council directed staff to set a date to hold a hearing regarding a recent liquor violation. After the hearing, Council can decide if they desire to take some action on the liquor licenses (suspend, revoke, civil fine) . RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the application(s) and grant an Off Sale, On Sale, Sunday, and/or Club Intoxicating Liquor License (s) to: Action Applicant On Sale Sunday Off Sale Club Approve Bretbecca, Inc. X X X 124 West 1st Avenue Approve XX Corp. & Wittles Inc. X X X 1561 E. 1st Avenue Approve Clair' s Bar Inc. X X X 124 South Holmes Approve J & D of Shakopee, Inc. X X 911 East 1st Avenue Approve MIN Hotel Corporation X X 1244 Canterbury Road Approve Canterbury Concessions, Inc X X X 1100 Canterbury Road Approve Turtle' s Bar & Grill , Inc. X X 132 East First Ave. Action Applicant On Sale Sunday Off Sale Club Approve Corp-Tool, Inc. X X 122 East First Avenue Approve Family Dining, Inc. X 6268 Hwy 101 Approve Riverside Liquors, Inc. X 507 E. 1st Avenue Approve Valley Liquor, Inc. X 1104 Minnesota Valley Mall Approve Spirits of Shakopee, Inc. X 471 Marschall Road Approve The American Legion X X Club Post No. 2 1266 East 1st Avenue Approve Knights of Columbus Home X X Assn. , Inc. 1760 East 4th Avenue Approve VFW, Post No. 4046 X X 1201 E. 3rd Ave. Approve Pablo's Mexican Restaurant, X Inc. 230 South Lewis Street nk TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Clerk and Treasurer Bonding DATE: June 14 , 1991 Introduction A recent article in the League magazine addressed employee bonding. The City of Shakopee has not changed the bond amounts of employees in recent years and therefore Council may want to review the issue. Background The City of Shakopee has a $50, 000 blanket bond covering all employees. The blanket bond does not cover the Clerk of the Treasurer. These two position each have a separate $100, 000 bond. The limits of the bonds have not been changed in recent years. A recent article in the League magazine reviewed employee bonding, especially the treasurers bond. An index developed by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) to determine the amount of bonding recommended is based on the amount of money flowing into the Treasurers office and the amount of securities in the portfolio. Based on the index, the amount of bonding for the cash flow portion would be about $200, 000. Adding to that, the index for the portfolio would push the bonding amount as high as one million, depending on how one would classify the various securities as negotiable. The Treasurers office recorded $16, 240, 263 in revenue for 1990 and the 1990 year end cash and investments under the Treasurers management was $24 , 238 , 469 . The Scott County Treasurer has a $100, 000 bond. Council sets the amount of bonding for the employees. My own feeling is that the blanket bond of $50, 000 is probably adequate. The Clerks bond at $50, 000 is probably adequate. The Treasurers bond at $50, 000 is below the range indicated by the GFOA and Council should review the limits they wish to have on the position. The approximate premiums for different levels are: $50, 000 limit $225. 00 premium $100, 000 limit $400. 00 premium $250, 000 limit $825. 00 premium $500, 000 limit not available $1, 000, 000 limit not available The bonds are calendar year bonds. Council can direct that the current bond be changed or wait until the renewal to make any changes. Alternatives 1. Reduce the amount of bonding. 2 . Status Quo. 3 . Increase the amount of any or all bonds. 4 . Increase the Treasurers bond to $100, 000. 5. Increase the Treasurers bond to $250, 000 . 6. Other amount changes. 7 . Make any changes at renewal or sooner. Recommendation Personally, the Treasurer is better off with the lowest bonding Council will accept because if something would happen to generate a claim under the bond, the bonding company is going to come after the Treasurer personally to collect. Therefore I may be in a position where I should not be making a recommendation. Council should discuss the issue and decide what bonding level they wish to have. Action Discuss and give staff direction on what changes to make (if any) and when to make them. e t11 I MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Consideration of Measures to Provide Support to the City of Prior Lake for a Highway 18\101\169 Interchange DATE: June 13 , 1991 INTRODUCTION: Councilmember Vierling has requested that an item be put on the June 18th agenda for consideration by the City Council of actions which could be presented to Metropolitan Council Chair Mary Anderson at the Chair' s breakfast meeting at Canterbury Inn on Friday June 21st. BACKGROUND: The Metropolitan Council has approved the plans for the Bloomington Ferry Bridge but has specifically not approved the paving of the interchange between County Highway 18 and the Shakopee Bypass and the Bloomington Ferry Bridge. County Highway 18 would provide a direct connection between the City of Prior Lake and the new bridge-bypass project. The Metropolitan Council has indicated that the approval of the paving of this interchange would result in unwanted growth outside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) contrary to adopted Metropolitan Council policy. Several attempts have been made to convince both Metropolitan Council and their staff of the need for this connection. Presented here are four options for City Council discussion and consideration. There is no assurance that any action taken by the Shakopee City Council at this time will change the position of the Metropolitan Council. Each of the alternatives presented has both positive and negative implications. 1. Establishment of a Moratorium - In discussions with Councilmember Vierling the Metropolitan Council apparently indicated that they would prefer a five to eight year moratorium. At this point we can see no way that a moratorium of that length could be established. The only statutory authority that we are aware of that exists at this time would be for the preparation of an interim zoning ordinance (moratorium) similar to action the Council has taken on the 150 acres immediately south of the Shakopee High School. This zoning enabling legislation would allow for a one year moratorium on development which could be followed by up to one and one-half additional years while a study was being conducted. It is seriously questioned whether this interim ordinance process would begin to meet Met Council concerns about premature development of the subject area. 2 . Officially Map the Area - It is possible for the City Council to adopt an amendment to the official map for this corridor and thereby prevent immediate development of the area. Provided that all of the legal hurdles are cleared with this option, the City Council could direct that no building permits be issued for the subject area. If someone were to apply for a building permit the City Council would have a period up to one year during which the permit would be held in abeyance, however at the expiration of the one year period the Council would have two choices: a) issue the permit or b) buy the property. Obviously this would result in the expenditure of significant sums of money if alternative b were to be followed. Potentially if this were to be pursued other governmental entities such as the City of Prior Lake or Scott County might be interested in purchasing some of this land. It is not known whether any entity would be willing to spend any money to do this at this time. 3 . Rezone the Property to AG or R-1 - It is legally possible for the City Council to rezone this property from I-1 to R-1 or AG. This would result in a much lower intensity of development. It has not been determined whether this would meet the Met Council ' s concern about attempting to prevent growth outside the MUSA line. Then, as now, if the minimum lot area requirements are met industrial development could occur on this I-1 property provided that the minimum lot size is at least 20 acres. If this were to be done the City' s Comprehensive Plan would have to be consistent with the zoning action taken. One potential negative in.pact of this option is that it might result in a long term low density development of an area that might be better off developed at a higher density in the next 15 - 20 years. The long term impact on the City of Shakopee should be evaluated if this alternative were to be pursued. Also, we would have no assurance that the current owners of this property would not litigate with the City as a result of attempting to implement this down zoning. 4 . Have the City of Shakopee Enter Into a Sewer Facility_ Agreement with the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) - ==n 1986 the City of Chanhassen entered into such an agreement with the Metropolitan Council and the MWCC. This agreement stipulated, among other things, that the City of Chanhassen would "use it' s best efforts to prevent the premature urbanization of areas outside the year 2000 Metropolitan Urban Service Area" (MUSA) . The agreement also provided for Chanhassen to "submit to the Council for review an adopted comprehensive plan" or amendments to the plan necessary to comply with the provisions of the agreement. This agreement further provided for Chanhassen to not exceed the Metropolitan Council ' s preliminary sewer flow of 1. 3 million gallons per day (mgd) annual average sanitary sewer flow, or other such flow as may result from amendments to the Council ' s Metropolitan Development Investment Framework (MDIF) . The agreement further stipulated that Chanhassen would adopt a comprehensive sewer plan consistent with their amended comprehensive plan and would also adopt an on-site sewage disposal ordinance consistent with the Metropolitan Council ' s Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan and that they would also enter into an infiltration in-flow reduction program. In that this action was taken in 1986 with a different Metropolitan Council, including a different Chairperson and different Councilmembers, it is not known whether such an agreement would be viewed as a solution to the current problem confronting the City of Prior Lake. ALTERNATIVES: Direct the City staff to pursue alternatives 2 , 3 or 4 above. Either singularly or in combination. RECOMMENDATION: Discuss the options presented above and decide whether any are to be pursued at this time and if a resolution should be adopted for presentation to Ms. Anderson on Friday June 21st at the Chair' s Breakfast. It is further recommended that the City Council carefully evaluate the negative and positive aspects of each alternative before taking any action. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to (adopt) (deny) Resolution No. , a Resolution Indicating SENT MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator RE: Resolution Urging the Scott County Commissioners to Adopt a Local Option Sales Tax DATE: June 11, 1991 INTRODUCTION: Under a law passed by the State Legislature this past session each County Board of Commissioners in the State has the option of imposing a one-half percent local sales tax for the County. It is both reasonable and advisable that the Shakopee City Council convey it' s feelings on this subject to the Scott County Board of Commissioners. BACKGROUND: Effective July 1, 1991 under recently enacted State law an increase in the State sales tax rate of one-half percent will go into effect. This sales tax increase will automatically expire on December 31, 1991 unless local governmental action is taken to impose this tax in each county. The County Board must make it ' s decision to impose this tax by July 1st of this year and then notify the Commissioner of Revenue by July 15th. If Scott County decides to impose the tax it will go into effect on January 1, 1992 and if it decides not to impose the tax by July 1st of this year it will be automatically removed effective January 1, 1992 unless action is taken by City Councils and Town Boards whose populations make-up a majority of the County' s population to reverse the decision of the County Board. If the Scott County Board does not adopt the sales tax increase cities and towns must enact their resolutions no later than August 1, 1991 . Failure to enact the local option sales tax will result in severe financial penalties for all entities in the County including the County Board and the various cities and towns in the County. All Homestead and Agricultural Credit (HACA) , local governmental aid will be lost. For the City of Shakopee that amount appears to be $646, 000. Prior Lake would lose approximately $749 , 000 and Savage approximately $583 , 000. It appears as though Scott County would lose approximately $5, 245, 000 . If the aforementioned amounts of revenue from the State of Minnesota were lost because of failure to take positive action on this subject either property taxes would have to increase dramatically or levels of service provided would be drastically curtailed. Although this termed a local option sales tax, in reality there does not appear to be much option involved. Attached for City Council consideration is Resolution No. 3417 A RESOLUTION URGING THE SCOTT COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO ADOPT A LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX. As Council is perhaps aware, Bill Koniarski, the Chair of the Scott County Board has set a meeting for Tuesday, June 18th at 1 : 00 for the purpose of discussing this optional sales tax item with representatives of the cities and townships in Scott County. The City will have representatives at that meeting and will be able to report on the meeting that evening. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Shakopee City Council adopt Resolution No. 3417 . ACTION REQUESTED: Move to adopt Resolution No. 3417 , A RESOLUTION URGING THE SCOTT COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO ADOPT A LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX. RESOLUTION NO. 3417 A RESOLUTION URGING THE SCOTT COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO ADOPT A LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX WHEREAS, the adoption of the one-half percent Local Option Sales Tax by Scott County would maintain financial aids to the County and the cities and townships within the County; and WHEREAS, failure of Scott County to adopt the Local Option Sales Tax would result in the loss of all county, city, and township aids within the County, amounting to an aid loss of about 4 .4 times as much revenue as the County would generate from the one-half percent sales tax; and WHEREAS, the failure of Scott County to adopt the tax would result in the aids currently being received by the local governments in Scott County to not be distributed to those entities, and instead would be redistributed as a windfall to the counties which adopt the tax; and WHEREAS, failure to adopt the tax would greatly increase property taxes in Scott County and/or result in a dramatic reduction in the provision of local governmental services; and WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Minnesota has, in effect, left local units of government with no choice but to accept the unpleasant task of adopting the mechanism which will assist the State to gets its financial house in order. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Shakopee urges the Scott County Board of Commissioners to adopt the one-half percent Local Option Sales Tax prior to the July 1 deadline for such adoption. ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota, this 18th day of June, 1991. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney CONSEI\IT EXPLANATION TO ORDINANCE 312 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: Law Department PURPOSE: To enact uniform notice requirements for zoning actions. REMARKS : State law requires that ten (10) days ' notice be given for zoning ordinance amendments and conditional use permits. Notice periods for variances and appeals are left up to the City Council. Currently we use notice periods of seven days for some items, and ten days for others. This has caused confusion in at least one case recently. A uniform time period will be easier to understand and administer. Although this concept is simple, the ordinance to accomplish it is somewhat lengthy. Therefore, an ordinance summary has been prepared. At its meeting of June 6, 1991, the Planning Commission reviewed this proposed ordinance amendment, and recommended that it be approved. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Ordinance No. 312 , an ordinance amending Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation (Zoning) , Section 11. 04 , Administration and Enforcement, by changing the notice requirements set forth in Subdivisions 4, 5, and 6, and move its adoption. [11. 04] ORDINANCE NO. 312 , FOURTH SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CHAPTER 11, LAND USE REGULATION (ZONING) , SECTION 11. 04, ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT, BY CHANGING THE NOTICE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISIONS 4 , 5, and 6 . THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS : Section 1 - That Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation (Zoning) , Sec. 11. 04 , Administration and Enforcement, is hereby amended by repealing Subd. 4 , Appeals, paragraph D; Subd. 5, Variances, paragraph C; and Subd. 6 , Conditional Use Permit, paragraph C; and enacting three new paragraphs in lieu thereof, which shall read as follows: Subd. 4 . Appeals. D. Notice of the hearing before the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall be mailed to all appellants. In all cases involving determination of district boundary lines, or interpretation of the text of this Chapter, not less than ten (10) [seven (7) ] days published notice of hearing in the official newspaper shall be given. Subd. 5 . Variances. C. Procedure. 1. An application for a variance shall be filed with the City Administrator on the appropriate forms stating the exceptional conditions and the peculiar difficulties claimed. A site plan must be attached at a scale large enough for clarity showing the following information: (a) Location and dimensions of: lot, building, driveways, and off-street parking spaces. (b) Distance between: building and front, side, and rear lot lines; principal building and accessory buildings; principal building and principal buildings on adjacent lots. (c) Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities, septic tanks, tile fields, water wells, etc. (d) Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the Administrator and applicable Sections of the Zoning Chapter. 2 . Property owners within 350 feet of the property for which a variance is requested, shall be notified, by mailed notice, of the proposed variance at least ten (10) [seven (7) ] days prior to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals ' public hearing on the application under consideration and ten (10) [seven (7) ] days published notice of hearing in the official newspaper. 3 . Variances may be denied by motion of the Board, and such motion shall constitute a finding and determination that the conditions required for approval do not exist. No application for a variance which has been denied wholly or in part shall be resubmitted for a period of six (6) months from the date of said order of denial, except on grounds of new evidence or proof of change of conditions. All decisions by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals are final subject to appeal to the Council. Written appeals may be made by any interested party and must be received by the City Administrator within ten (10) [seven (7) ] days of the Planning Commission action. Appeals to the Council require a public hearing, as stated in paragraph [Item] 2 above; all decisions by the Council are final. 4 . A violation of any condition set forth in granting a variance shall be a violation of this Chapter and automatically terminates the variance. 5. A variance shall become void one (1) year after it was granted unless made use of. Subd. 6 . Conditional Use Permit. C. Procedure. 1. The person applying for a conditional use permit shall fill out and submit to the Administrator a conditional use application form plus fee. At the time of submission of the permit, the developer shall supply the City with a time schedule for completion of the project and proof of ownership of subject property and the Administrator may request the developer to deposit up to $1, 000. 00 held in a special developer' s escrow account and shall be credited to the said developer. Engineering, Planning, Administrative and legal expenses incurred by the City shall be paid by the developer. The Administration of the escrow account shall follow Section 12 . 03 , Subd. 3 , of the Subdivision Regulations. 2 . A site plan must be attached at a scale large enough for clarity showing the following information: (a) Location and dimensions of: lot, building, driveways, and off-street parking spaces. (b) Distance between: building and front, side, and rear lot lines; principal building and accessory buildings; principal building and principal buildings on adjacent lots. (c) Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities, septic tanks, tile fields, water wells, etc. (d) Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the Administrator and applicable Sections of the Zoning Chapter, including, but not limited to, the following: 2 (1) Site plan drawn at scale dimensions with setback noted. (2) Location of all buildings, heights, and square footage. (3) Curb cuts, driveways, parking spaces. (4) Off-street loading areas. (5) Drainage plan. (6) Type of business, proposed number of employees by shift. (7) Proposed floor plan with use indicated and building elevations. (8) Sanitary sewer and water plan with estimated use per day. (9) A lighting plan showing the lighting of parking area, walks, security lighting and driveway entrance lights. (10) A landscape plan with a schedule of the plantings. 3 . The Administrator shall refer the application to the Planning Commission for review and shall post notice. 4 . The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the proposal. Notice of the public hearing shall be published in the official newspaper designated by the City at least ten (10) [seven (7) ] days prior to the hearing. Notice of the hearing shall also be mailed to owners of property located within 350 feet of the outer boundaries of the land to which the conditional use will be applicable. The notice shall include a description of the land and the proposed conditional use. 5. The application shall be placed on the agenda of the Planning Commission at its next regular meeting, but not later than sixty (60) days after the applicant has submitted the application. 6. The Planning Commission must take action on the application within sixty (60) days after the public hearing is closed. In all cases the Planning Commission must act on the request within 120 days of submittal of the application unless a time extension is requested by the applicant in writing. If it grants the conditional use permit, the Planning Commission may impose conditions (including time limits) it considers necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare. 7. An amended conditional use permit application shall be administered in a manner similar to that required for a new conditional use permit. Amended conditional use permits shall include requests for changes in conditions, and as otherwise described in this Chapter. 3 8 . No application for a conditional use permit shall be resubmitted for a period of six (6) months from the date of said order of denial. 9 . If a time limit or periodic renewal is included as a condition by which a conditional use permit may be renewed at a public hearing with notice of said hearing published at least ten (10) days prior to the renewal ; it shall be the responsibility of the Administrator to schedule such public hearings and the owner of the land having a conditional use permit shall be required to pay a fee for said renewal. A public hearing for the annual renewal of a conditional use permit may be granted at the discretion of the Council. 10 . All actions by the Planning Commission are final subject to appeal to the Council. Written appeals may be made by any interested party and must be received by the City Administrator within seven (7) days of the Planning Commission action. All decisions by the Council are final. 11. In the event that the applicant violates any of the conditions set forth in this permit, the Council shall have the authority to revoke the conditional use permit. 12 . A conditional use permit shall be used within one year, or it shall become void. A conditional use permit which is discontinued to six months shall be void. Note: The bracketed language [thus] is deleted; the underlined language is inserted. Section 2 - General Provisions. City Code Chapter 1, General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty For Violation, and Section 11. 99 , Violation a Misdemeanor, are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3 - Summary Approved. The City Council hereby determines that the text of the summary of this ordinance, marked "Official Summary of Ordinance No. 312" and a copy of which is attached hereto, clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. The Council further determines that publication of the title and such summary will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. Section 4 - Posting and Filing. A copy of this ordinance is filed in the office of the City Clerk and a copy is provided to the Scott County Library for posting and filing, at which locations a copy is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours. 4 Section 5 - The City Clerk shall publish the title of this ordinance and the official summary in the official newspaper with notice that a printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and the Scott County Library. Section 6 - Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective upon its passage and the publication of its title and summary. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1991. Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: City Clerk Approved as to form: '`z__ �� Cc�_. l City Attorney Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the day of , 1991. [11. 04] Attachment 5 ORDINANCE NO. 312 , FOURTH SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CHAPTER 11, LAND USE REGULATION (ZONING) , SECTION 11. 04 , ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT, BY CHANGING THE NOTICE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISIONS 4, 5, and 6. The following is the official summary of Ordinance No. 312 , Fourth Series, approved by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, on , 1991: The notice requirements of Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation (Zoning) , are hereby amended by amending provisions in Sec. 11. 04 , Administration and Enforcement. Previously seven days ' mailed or published notice was required prior to appeals being heard in zoning and land use matters, variances, conditional use permits, and rezonings. Now ten (10) days ' notice will be required. The following paragraphs were repealed and replaced in order to make the change: Subd. 4, Appeals, paragraph D; Subd. 5 , Variances, paragraph C; and Subd. 6, Conditional Use Permit, paragraph C. A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person at the office of the City Clerk and at the Scott County Library. [11. 04) TONSENT Inc MEMO TO: DENNIS KRAFT, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DAVE HUTTON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR tpj 112 SUBJECT: DEVELOPER STREET SIGNS DATE: JUNE 7 , 1991 INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting authorization to revise the current fee schedule to add a fee for installing street signs for developers. BACKGROUND Currently, most developers agreements include a requirement that the developer must, furnish and install all street name signs . This system is somewhat cumbersome and sometimes confusing to developers. First, they must obtain a source for the signs and quite often they must contact Public Works to find a supplier. Then once the sign and pole are purchased, the sign must be delivered to Public Works in order to install the crossbar at the bottom of the pole, which is needed to prevent vandals from turning the sign. Then the sign is returned to the developer for installation, but Public Works staff is often requested to go to the site to ensure the sign is installed in the proper location. This is one of the last items a developer will complete and quite often the signs do not get installed until several homes are already constructed and occupied. Staff would like to simplify this process by simply having Public Works install the signs and charge the costs back to the developer. This is quite common in other cities and in fact several developers have suggested this alternative. Staff has calculated that it would cost the City approximately $250 per sign. Attachment. #1 is a breakdown of those costs. In order to incorporate this alternative, the fee schedule should be revised accordingly. Attached is Resolution No. 3412 , which amends the 1991 fee schedule for City Council consideration. ALTERNATIVES 1 . Reject Resolution No. 3412 and maintain the status quo. 2 . Adopt Resolution No . 3412 which sets the fee for street sign installation at $250 per sign. :? . Adopt Resolution No. 3412 , but establish a different fee. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 . ACTION REQUESTED Offer Resolution No. 3412 , A Resolution Amending the 1991 fee schedule and move its adoption. RESOLUTION NO. 3412 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 3328 , ADOPTING THE 1991 FEE SCHEDULE, BY ADOPTING ONE NEW FEE RELATING TO STREET SIGN INSTALLATION. WHEREAS, currently developers install street signs at their own expense; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received requests from developers to have the City furnish and install street signs at the developers ' expense; and WHEREAS, City Council now desires to amend the 1991 Fee Schedule. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: That the 1991 Fee Schedule is hereby amended by adding one new fee relating to street sign installation, which shall read as follows: Street sign installation (per each sign pole) $250. 00 Note: The added provisions are underlined; the deleted provisions are bracketed [thus] . Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1991. Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: City Clerk Approved as to form: _ 0 LL,A., City Attorney [RESFEE] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 STREET SIGN COSTS (FOR ONE SIGN) Sign Name Plates (4 ) - $ 66 .00 Sign Post ( 1 ) - 20.00 Sign Bracket ( 1 ) - 21 .00 Installation Front End Loader ( 1 Hr)- 90 .00 Operator ( 1 Hr) - 13 . 50 + benefits Laborer ( 1 Hr) - 12 .70 + benefits TOTAL $223 . 20 Call it $250 .00 to cover benefits , overhead, miscellaneous , etc . n cm 7mi MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator r FROM: Dave Hutton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: 2nd Avenue, Sommerville Street to Naumkeag Street Project No. 1991-3 DATE: June 17, 1991 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 3418 accepting bids and awarding the contract for the 2nd Avenue Project. BACKGROUND: On May 21, 1991, the City Council of Shakopee ordered advertisement for bids for the 2nd Avenue Project. This project consists of constructing 2nd Avenue from Sommerville Street to west of Naumkeag Street including paving the existing gravel roads, installing new sewer, watermains, storm sewer, and adding curb & gutter to the street. In addition to 2nd Avenue, the project also involves paving all north-south streets that are currently gravel and installing sewer and watermains in all other areas that currently do not have it. On June 14, 1991 at 10: 00 A.M. bids were received and publicly opened for this project. A total of four bids were received and are summarized in the attached resolution. The low bid was submitted by Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. of Osseo for a total bid of $1, 008, 777 . 00. The Engineering Department has reviewed all bids for completeness and also the qualifications of Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. , the apparent low bidder, and have determined that they are able to perform the work as described by the plans and specifications. The Engineer's estimate for this project was approximately $960, 000. 00. Staff is also requesting that the City Council authorize a contingency equal to 5% of the contract for use by the City Engineer to cover any change orders or quantity adjustments that may occur on this project. A contingency amount of 5% of the bid is equal to $50,438. 00. Attached is Resolution No. 3418, which accepts the bids on this project and awards the contract to Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 3418 awarding the contract to Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. 2 . Reject the low bid and award the bid to the second low bidder or another bidder. 3 . Reject all bids and rebid. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1, to accept the low bid and award the bid to Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. for a total amount of $1, 008, 777 . 00. ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Offer Resolution No. 3418, A Resolution Accepting Bids on 2nd Avenue, Between Sommerville Street and Naumkeag Street, and Various Abutting Cross Streets, Project No. 1991-3 and move its adoption. 2 . Approve of a contingency in the amount of 5% for use by the City Engineer in authorizing change orders on this project. DH/pmp RESOLUTION NO. 3418 A Resolution Accepting Bid On 2nd Avenue, Between Sommerville Street And Naumkeag Street, And Various Abutting Cross Streets Project No. 1991-3 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for 2nd Avenue, between Sommerville Street and Naumkeag Street and various abutting cross streets, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. $1, 008 , 777 . 00 J.P. Norex $1, 045, 940 . 65 S.M. Hentges & Sons $1, 246 , 794 . 90 Northdale Construction $1, 690, 904 . 50 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. , 11000 93rd Avenue North, P.O. Box 367, Osseo, MN 55369 is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. , in the name of the City of Shakopee for the improvement of 2nd Avenue between Sommerville Street and Naumkeag Street and various abutting cross streets by complete street reconstruction (pavement, curb & gutter, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain) , according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 19 Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney TONSENT z MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Lindberg S. Ekola, City Planner RE: Amended Resolution No. 3397 Meadows 5th Addition DATE: June 14 , 1991 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: On May 21, 1991 the City Council approved Resolution No. 3397 for the Meadows 5th Addition. One of the conditions required the developer to dedicate an outlot to the City for park dedication purposes. This outlot exceeds the amount required for The 5th Addition. The surplus land is intended to be land banked for future subdivision plats within The Meadows Development. DISCUSSION: The condition did not address the land bank concept. Staff is recommending that the condition be amended to include the land banking of 1. 88 acres for future plats in The Meadows Development. ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Reconsider Resolution No. 3397 . 2 . Amend Resolution No. 3397 , Condition 2E to read as follows: The Developer shall deed to the City Outlot A for park dedication requirements. The developer shall be credited 1. 88 acres for park dedication purposes for future subdivision plats in The Meadows Development. 3 . Vote on amended Resolution No. 3397. RESOLUTION NO. 3397 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF THE MEADOWS 5TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee did approve the Final Plat of The Meadows 5th Addition and has recommended its adoption; and WHEREAS, all notices of hearing have been duly sent and posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council has been fully advised in all things. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the Final Plat of The Meadows 5th Addition, described as follows: Outlot E of The Meadows. be, and the same hereby is approved and adopted with the requirements that: 1. Approval of title opinion by the City Attorney. 2 . Execution of a developer' s agreement for construction of required improvements: A. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPUC Manager. B. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPUC Manager. C. Sanitary sewer and storm sewer to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the design criteria and standards of the City of Shakopee. D. Local streets and street signs within the plat shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the design criteria and standard specifications of the City of Shakopee. E. The Developer shall deed to the City Outlot A for park dedication requirements. The developer shall be credited 1. 88 acres for park dedication purposes for future subdivision plats in The Meadows Development. F. Approval of the City Engineer' s apportionment of the existing special assessments. 3 . The developer shall provide a recordable agreement stating that not more than 10% of the plat will be developed into twin homes. Twin homes will require separate utility connections, and sites must be identified before installation of utilities. 4 . The developer will be responsible for the grading of the plat (as per the preliminary drainage plan) . 5 . The City shall reimburse the developer for storm sewer improvements in 11th Avenue from the Storm Sewer Utility Fund based on the following formula: a. 75% of one-half of the actual construction costs for installing the storm sewer in 11th Avenue. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk be and the same are hereby authorized and directed to execute said approved Plat and Developer's Agreement. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 21st day of May, 1991. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form. City Attorney /2ETO /2C- TO: : Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Defeasance of TIF Bond Issues DATE: June 18, 1991 Introduction Council indicated that staff should investigate the possibility of defeasing some of the TIF bond issues using the balance in the TIF trust fund and report back to Council. Background Springsted has made the calculations of the cost of defeasing (retiring) the three pooled TIF bond issues supported by Districts 1 - 6. Retiring those tree bond issues would enable Council to close Districts #2 - Highrise, #3 - Downtown and #6 - Motel. The cost to defease the 19866, 1987A and 1987B G.O. Tax Increment bond issues on August 1, 1991 is $4,505,432. That amount less money already in the debt service funds of $147,808 equates to a draw out of the trust fund of about $4,357,624. The January 1991 balance in the trust fund was $5,168,577. KMart, Ladbroke and Canterbury Inn have paid the first half of pay 1991 taxes. Projections for the status of the TIF trust fund based on current years taxes are attached. The disadvantages to defeasing these bonds are: 1.) the escrow will have restricted interest earnings until the call date of the bonds versus unrestricted earnings in the trust fund, 2.) Council would have a smaller cushion in the trust fund if TIF tax receipts are interrupted. The advantages are: 1.) to lower the outstanding debt of the city, 2.) permit closing of three TIF districts, 3.) lower the cash balance in the trust fund to avoid the perception by the public or the state that Council is stashing away a lot of TIF money. In order to close any TIF district in time to impact payable 1992 taxes, Council would have to act to defease the three bond issues and close a district by the July 2, 1991 meeting. Alternatives 1. Defease the three bond issues. 2. Defease two bond issues. 3. Defease one bond issue. 4. Do nothing at this time. Recommendation There is still the risk that something may happen to interrupt the flow of tax increment income. Drawing down on the trust fund balance leaves a smaller cushion to spread out that impact over more time. Council need to determine the priority of closing districts and public/state perception versus the size of the trust fund balance and increased interest earnings. Action Discuss and give staff direction. 4) CO M N N 11 LA P N IA CO P > V1 to P M O to O •O Al - CO LA M f� 6) P LA .f to .t V1 .O N. - M N. •O 40 - ♦) U . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4:1• C O LA N )A ti f. N M 1 N0 W .- N M )A ti N CO CO 1 •O 0 O V1 N P CO 4 J 0 N J d 0 M A M 1 1 •0 N. M m N M 1 N •O •O •O ti CO P O .- M U .. - ..-- N. N. pP. O P •O f• - •O N M M a0 •O C) LA P 0 CO O .- M •- J CO M Al 7m u Gp [ n> .1- .- •O - N CO.43 .0 1 .f 1 I .4 CO •O CC Cu Al N (V M NI NI •O 0 0 - LA LA Q CO Ca — - - .- - - - - - N •O O P 0 M .- N. N 0 to LA LA LA O N 4) LA P O- N N Al P P CO 1 •-• 1 N U • O ` P_ P P )A N N O •O P_ N- C) > N Cl) M N N I .t .f lA O C.. O O 0 0 Ni N N P LA LA 1 1 •O C) N N N Cu N .- - - 1 P P P P CO CO CO 00 CO 00 00 O O o(7 r ^ NI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 c0 yE M M N1 NI N1 M NI NI NI •O m U. b Cn LA v1 1/1 ti N. N- Is.. N- N. N. f- N. '0 V - C.) CO M M M M CO CO CO O CD CO CO CO CO N O F- C N N N N LA V1 LA LA LA LA to LC% LA N ~ - Ni 1,1 M M .- - - .- - - - - - f` N O V1 v1 LA )A CO CO COO CO CO CO CO CO CO N P 0 - a00 a0o a0 m c0 CO 3 N ~ N- ti N. N- f` .O •0 •0 •O •0 •0 •O •O .0 N >. O U. •O •O •O •O Al N N N N N N N Al - 0 - M M NI M N N N N N N N Cu N LA CC CO 0 M J v 0 NI C) 1 .t .t .t 1 .t 1 .t .t .t 1 .t .1 M a) L LA LA LA LA LA LA LA IA LA LA LA LA LA 0 C L - •O P O• O• O• P P P P P O• P O• P 1 C) (Si N N N N N N N N N N N N CO U O t-• NI > c- 0 a) 0 T. •O •O •O •O •O •O .O •O •O •O •O •O •O a0 P L .t .t 4 1 1 .t .t 1 .t .t 1 .t .T P • w C .3 P P P P P P P P P P P P P N C v LA C a) n C) C LA N. Is- N- N N- N. N. N- n N- N- N. ti M y.. - N u L CO C O N U to 1>Cf�11 C) Y CO CO CO CO N O f>. a+ 1• U N. N. N. N- E - C> •� L 1 1 1 P L C. •- N en en M M M LA > 0 O U . C) O CO - - - - 1A A) N 1 CY C L ea 0 C) M M M M •O •O •O •O .0 •O •0 •0 •O .0 4) .— Y O 0 O 0 M M NI M M M NI M M M10 T. - U CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 00 f- to d a+ Jo+ L .p1. ` N. N-Cp N. f. PC.p f. N- N. N- 1. (0 C C) NI O O O O •O •0 •O 2 •O 2 2 •O d NLA �.• a) L 0 0 U • C) L a+ C (0 - .- - .- 0 L 4) O N 2 OC - 41 w () 0 w C[) 0 0 M f+1 M M f2 �1 �.1 M f� NC a7 C >. ti f. t. !. N- 1. f. N- 1 0 N L a0 CO a0 O OJ CO W co c0 a0 a0 a0 a0 M xi-3 a.+ O a+ L .t 1 .t .f J 1 1 .t 1 .f .f .t 1 M U v- L O N N Cl) N N N N N N Cl) Cu Al N N N C) ✓ 6) 0 4) X P P P P P P P P P P P P U O • 04. UY1. m OL O 3 0. 0 Y V C.) a a7 0. 0 U LAl M 1 LA .0 f• Cd P 0 — N M 0 N V) C _ .—• P Os O P P P P Os O 0 CO 0 C) U. w a+ a 0 P P P P P P Os P N (V N N - --- O C ++ C.) T. C. > t0 T. 0 Al M 1 LA .O f` CO P 0 - (V C) 4+ L X > O• O• P P P P P O P P O O O ++ 0 C) P P P P P P P P P P O O O O U U Y J N Al Al Z CA O N O N O O N O CA CA in •O LA M in CO N rel to 0. 0. N. N P .. rn ti CO P P O.• O 00 •0 O. •O J .- 00 CO CO Lel N CO M N N .- .- P •O •O P in O. N N N N N N N N .- .- .- •O d •L J J J s J J J J J J J J O • m 0 IA MO N. J N 010 O O to 00 rz A Cl) J M 0. CO CA COS LA P N CO L N CO dN M M M M Al •O J CV J 0 0. .0 4- > N Al Al Al Al N N N N N N o m O Cl) e •0 O L O — ti M CO Cl) CI P N • • e0 > t • 0. 0 2 IA 0 p- 4I CO 41 VL O. 03 N U co .M- O y U ea GO1 y L. 0k 0 L. L 4) Cl) v0 a+ W U N O. 4• L d G N 0 co w • So L. p• M •_ L . > = M L U ii. I� N pp�� Al J J 0 0_ CA 0 CA 0 ��Qp U C •O P O t- N N1 0 CPO ry� OO L N •O N •O N r P 01 0 L E O. ~ N N N Al N Al N IL. > 000 J O et ^ N N 00 C 10 T. .-• O^ rs Co M N 8 T to 3 m . N w' Cl r M •4- C W Co M N 2 U L a+ N 0 w P C AONL O ) 0 CO I — co)co o Z Jh . MMNNN in `- m M M in in 2 '4- 0 M .•' Y J J J J J J J J M U'.- 3Al w ` ad 0. 0 CO N 0. U .0 — NMJLLC) 0. C0P 0 N M y P P P P P OpppO` u. < ••- 4.• 0 N N N N I-- 1- 0 C ✓ U CJ L p� T. 7 . 4 P O• O• P P O• g P P P 0 0 0 O U U Y J N N N 2 06%18-E1 12:57 FAX 612 223 3002 SPRINGSTED INC. CJ002;003 • -Y SPRINGSTED . ;; :}?X PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS 500 Elm Grove Road 85 East Seventh Place 135 North Pennsylvania Street Suite 101.P.O.Box 37 Suite 100 Suite 2015 Elm Grove,WI 53122.0037 Saint Paul,MN 55101-2143 Indianapolis,IN 46204-2498 (414) 782.8222 (612) 223.3000 (317) 684.6000 Fax' (414)782-2904 Fax:(612)223.3002 Fax: (317)684-6004 2739 Socond Avenue S.E. 6800 College Boulevard 222 South Ninth Street Cedar Rapids. IA 52403.1434 Suite 600 Suite 2825 (319) 363-2221 Overland Parte.KS 66211.1533 Minnea lis.MN 55402.3368 Fax: (319)363-6999 (913) 345.8062 Fax 3333.91,763 7 Fax-(913)345.1770 June 18, 1991 Mr. Greg Voxland, Finance Director Shakopee City Hall 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Defeasance Study of Outstanding Tax Increment Financing Issues Dear Mr. Voxiand: We have reviewed the potential of defeasing three outstanding tax Increment financing issues. These three issues are: $1,645,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Financing Bonds, Series 19868; $2,660,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Financing Bonds, Series 1987A; and $1,600,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Financing Bonds, Series 19878. The defeasement process Is basically the establishment of an account wherein the City deposits a sum of money such that when those funds are invested at restricted Interest rates, they generate sufficient income to pay all principal and Interest up to the first prepayment date, at which time the entire obligation is retired. Once the defeasement account is established, the debt ceases to be an obligation of the City and all of the legal restrictions regarding the source of funds, etc., are terminated. The City is looking at these three Issues to a) determine the overall economic feasibility for each of the issues, and b) determine their impact on the overall condition of the City's tax increment financing districts. The establishment of the escrow accounts and the interest rate at which funds can be invested in the escrow are restricted under federal law. Specifically, the escrow cannot earn an interest rate which is materially higher than the rate on the bonds. Therefore, to determine the advisability of conducting the defeasance, we compare the interest rate for investment purposes which would be permitted in the escrow versus what the City could earn if the escrow is not established and those funds are eligible to be invested with all other City funds. To the extent that the City could earn a higher rate by not defeasing, the financial position of the fund may be better off by not proceeding with the defeasement process. We have completed a defeasance analysis which assumes a defeasance date as of August 1, 1991. The defeasance analysis defines the amount of City funds required upfront to establish the escrow account. This analysis includes the debt service payments to be made by the City as of August 1 , 1991 , but does not include any related expenses for establishing the defeasance accounts. It is our experience that defeasance expenses are fairly minimal. O6%18- 1 12: 58 FAX 812 223 3uu2 SPRIDGSTEh INC. CZ]uu3.003 City of Shakopee, Minnesota June 18, 1991 Page 2 In Table I below we have summarized the results of our estimates of establishing the defeasance, Table I: Defeasance Analysis Original Minor Bond Funds Call Series Amount Portion Yield Required Date 19868 $1,645,000 $246,750 7.26% $1,431,795 2/1/95 1987A 2,660,000 100,000 5.054% 1,496,410 2/1/94 1987B 1,600,000 80,000 7.110% 1,578,227 2/1/97 Total $4,506,432 We would like to focus on three columns specifically, the Bond Yield, Funds Required and Call Date. The bond yield is the restricted rate at which funds could be invested In the escrow. The rates range from a low of 5.954% to a high of 7.206%. We evaluate the probability that the City could invest these same funds at higher rates than those restricted in the escrow. In discussions with City staff, it is our understanding that at present the City is investing funds at approximately 7-3/4%. Therefore, given today's interest rates and assuming that those rates would be at minimum levels for the next three years, the City would be better off not defeasing. This determination is made solely on the economic position of each individual fund. The total funds required to defease all three issues is slightly in excess of $4.5 million. It is our understanding that if all three issues were defeased, this cash outflow would jeopardize the position of the City's TIF trust fund. Therefore, we do not think it is prudent to defease ail three issues at this time. There are uncertainties regarding the future collection of increment Income which could increase the risk of a cash shortfall for debt service. We would like to note the call dates in that these bonds would be eligible to be prepaid beginning on February 1, 1994 with the 1987A issue and proceeding through February 1 , 1997 for the 1987E issue. The City may wish to consider defeasing one or possibly two of these issues, keeping in mind that in the not too distant future they will be able to prepay the entire issue without having to go through a defeasement process. Recommendation Our recommendation is not to defease all three issues because the amount of funds required to effect the defeasement of all issues would severely restrict the cash position of the City's TIF trust funds. Second, solely from the financial position of each individual bond issue, the City may wish to consider defeasing those bonds with the highest restricted bond yield in the defeasance and the longest possible call date. Based on those criteria, the 19876 issue would seem to be a viable candidate if the City were interested in defeasing one or more of the issues. By defeasing that issue, the City would reduce by two years the term of this outstanding TIF debt, assuming the other two issues were prepaid on the call date. This is an involved topic and we are certainly available to discuss the situation at length. espectfully, 1J vrri David N. MacGillivray Senior Vice President mmr EXECUTIVE SESSION MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Barry A. Stock, Assistant City Administrator RE: Purchase Agreement - Lots 3 and 4 , Block 52 , O. S. P. DATE: June 17 , 1991 INTRODUCTION: The City has received an executed Purchase Agreement for the acquisition of Lots 3 and 4 , block 52 , O.S.P. The Purchase Agreement has been submitted by Cole and Ruth VanHorn in the amount of $30, 000 . BACKGROUND: The City has retained the realtor services of Coldwell Banker to assist the City in the sale of several vacant properties. On Monday, June 17 , 1991, Ms. Jane DuBois, representing Coldwell Banker, submitted a Purchase Agreement on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Cole VanHorn. The Purchase Agreement was for the property identified as Lots 3 and 4, Block 52 , O.S . P. Mr. and Mrs. VanHorn have submitted a price for the City' s consideration in the amount of $30, 000 for the aforementioned property. They have also submitted one major contingency with their offer that states that the Purchase Agreement price is conditioned upon the buyers obtaining the necessary State and City permits to move the buyers home, which is presently located at 303 E. 1st Ave. , to the subject property. I have reviewed the aforementioned contingency with the City Planner and Building Official. Both parties do not foresee any major problems with the VanHorns ' receiving the necessary City permits in regard to moving the home. The necessary City permits include a conditional use permit and subsequent building permit. Staff believes that the contingency stipulated by Mr. and Mrs. VanHorn will not present a problem. However, a second contingency included in the Purchase Agreement specifies that the contingency shall be satisfied by the Buyer by July 15, 1991. This is not a realistic date since the conditional use permit for moving the home could not be reviewed by the Planning Commission until their August 8th meeting. Therefore, staff would like to recommend Council direct that the contingency satisfaction date be changed to September 1, 1991. Prior to listing the property for sale, the City had an appraisal conducted on said property. The appraiser placed a value of $17 , 000 on each lot independently. The appraisal report also identified a comparable sale that is very similar to the acquisition proposed by Mr. and Mrs. VanHorn. The comparable AU/BS/VANHORNS identified as Lots 1 and 2 , Block 44 , is approximately nine blocks west of the subject property, sold in July of 1990 for $33 , 000. Given the amount of time that the property has actually been listed for sale and the aforementioned appraisers report on the subject property, staff would like to recommend that the appropriate City officials be authorized to make a counter offer to Mr. and Mrs. VanHorn in the amount of $34 , 000. Ms. DuBois will be present at the June 18, 1991 Council meeting to answer any questions regarding the proposed sale. Since the discussion of this item will address issues that may impact the negotiation process, staff is recommending that this item be discussed under executive session. Since Mr. and Mrs. VanHorn are in a difficult situation in terms of their property being within the mini bypass right-of-way and they may be faced with the possibility of vacating their premises on November 1, 1991, staff would like to recommend that if the City selects to make a counter offer and the VanHorns select to accept the counter offer, that the appropriate City officials be authorized to execute the Purchase Agreement and any other documents pertaining to the sale of Lots 3 and 4 , Block 52 , O. S. P. to Mr. and Mrs. Cole VanHorn. Staff would like to point out that if the VanHorns accept the City' s counter offer, that between the time of acceptance and the contingency satisfaction date, no other offers on the subject property can be entertained by the City. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Move to authorize the appropriate City officials to submit a counter offer in the amount of $34 , 000 with a contingency satisfaction date of September 1, 1991 for the sale of Lots 3 and 4 , Block 52 , O.S. P. to Mr. and Mrs. Cole VanHorn with the understanding that if said counter offer is accepted, the appropriate City officials be authorized to execute any and all documents pertaining to said sale. 2 . Reject the Purchase Agreement offer submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Cole VanHorn. 3 . Make a counter offer in an amount different than what was recommended by staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1. AU/BS/VANHORNS ACTION REQUESTED: Move to authorize the appropriate City officials to submit a counter offer in the amount of $34 , 000 with a contingency satisfaction date of September 1, 1991 for the sale of Lots 3 and 4 , Block 52 , O.S.P. to Mr. and Mrs. Cole VanHorn with the understanding that if said counter offer is accepted, the appropriate City officials be authorized to execute any and all documents pertaining to said sale. AU/BS/VANHORNS MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Request from Lions Club to Escrow Funds for the Development of Lions Park DATE: June 18, 1991 INTRODUCTION: The City has received a request from the Shakopee Lions Club to receive a deposit of $8 , 000. 00 to $12 , 000. 00 for development of the lower portion of Lions Park and to hold it in trust until there are sufficient funds. BACKGROUND: The Lions Club has funds which they would like to deposit with the City for development of the lower portion of Lions Park. They do not wish to start the project until completion of the By-pass. They desire to deposit the money with the City at this time to avoid paying Federal Income tax on the money. Their fiscal year ends June 30th. If they deposit the money with the City, at the City' s request, it is an eligible expenditure of gambling profits and is not taxed. (It is my understanding that the City has received $8, 000. 00 from the lions for this project already. ) The Finance Director recommends that the money be deposited in the Escrow Fund rather than the Park Reserve Fund so that we can keep track of when it was received, from whom and what it is for. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize and direct the City Clerk to execute a "request by a Government to Spend Gambling Funds" to the Shakopee Lions Club int he amount of $12 , 000. 00 for development of the lower portion of Lions Park; and, direct the Finance Director to deposit the money received into the Escrow Fund earmarked for the development of Lions Park. JSC/tiv