HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/15/1989 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items
DATE: --August 11, 1989
1. Shakopee Ducks Unlimited have applied for a Charitable
Gambling License for September 19, 1989. They meet the
requirements of the City Code.
2. Attached is a notice regarding the ground breaking
ceremony for Mebco Industries Inc.
3. Attached is the Building Activity Report for July,
1989.
4. Attached are the minutes of the June 21, 1989 meeting
of the Downtown Ad Hoc Committee.
5. Attached are the minutes of the June 29, 1989 meeting
of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
A
ANNOUNCING
GROUND BREAKING CEREMONY
FOR
MEBCO
INDUSTRIES
INC.
BILL HENNING & COMPANY IS PLEASED TO
ANNOUNCE THE GROUND BREAKING
CEREMONY FOR MEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
WHERE: CANTERBURY PARK, INDUSTRIAL
BLVD, SHAKOPEE
WHEN: 4:00 P.M. MONDAY, AUGUST 14, 1989
R.S.V.P. BILL HENNING & COMPANY
TEL: 681-9553
SITE LO(S CN MP
a!NTEBBUBY PAW
Rte""'" 111-t il
�cn
m pyx.
- ,; -- - ......... "
3
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT
PERMITS ISSUED July, 1989
Yr. to Date Previous Year
Number Number Valuation Number Valuation
No. YTD.
Single Fam-Sewered 15 57 4,020,715 2 38 2,669,750
Single Fam-Septic 1 4 532,000 2 9 916,700
Multiple Dwellings - 2 222,000 - 2 216,800
(# Units) (YTD Units) (6) (6) - (-) (4) -
Dwelling Additions 8 52 242,071 2 39 193,803
Other 0 7 163,590 2 4 37, 595
Comm. New Bldgs 2 5 1,012,700 - 1 90, 000
Bldg. Addns - - - - 7 563,000
Industrial-Sewered - - - - 1 915, 000
Ind-Sewered Addns 1 2 102,990 1 1 575,000
Industrial-Septic - - - - - -
Ind-Septic Addns - - - - - -
Accessory/Garages 2 19 117,465 7 16 121,586
Signs & Fences 4 47 47,081 13 39 53,545
Fireplaces/Wood Stoves 1 4 12,900 - 5 17,500
Grading/Foundation 0 10 1,406,720 - 1 500
Remodeling (Res. ) 1 15 79,790 4 18 80, 550
Remodeling (Inst. ) 1 1 97,230 - - -
Remodeling (Comm/Ind. ) 1 25 1,953,669 - 15 204,000
TOTAL TAXABLE 36 249 9,913,691 33 198 6,655,329
TOTAL INSTITUTIONAL 1 1 97,230 - - -
GRAND TOTAL 37 250 10,010,921 33 198 6,655,329
No. YTD. No. YTD.
Variances - 2 2 7
Conditional Use 3 13 2 12
Rezoning - - 1 2
Moving - 1 2 3
Electric 53 200 27 166
Plumbing & Heating 42 225 14 164
Razing Permits
Residential 1 1 1 3
Commercial - - - -
Total dwelling units in City after completion of all construction permitted
to date. . . . . . . . 4,346
Jeanette Shaner
Building Department Secretary
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IN JULY, 1989
8292 Lecy Const. 1371 Maxine Circle House $ 200, 000
L 4 B 1 Weinandt Acres
8293 Novak-Fleck 624 11th Ave. House $ 53 , 040
L 19 B 3 Meadows 1st
8294 Jeffrey Brang 411 E. 2nd Ave. Fence $ 300
8295 Mark Crom 2149 Heritage Dr. Fence $ 100
8296 Linda Loffler 204 West 8th Ave. Deck $ 1,500
8297 Thomas Schmidt 330 E. 4th Ave. Addn. $ 1,200
8298 Laurent Builders 2693 C. R. 79 Comm. $ 170, 000
8299 Novak-Fleck 1171 Minnesota St. House $ 63 , 000
L 7 B 2 Meadows lst
8300 Bob Imker 1105 Legion St. House $ 64, 000
L 13 B 2 Prairie Estates
8301 Steven Laurent 2501 Onyx Drive House $ 110, 000
L 11 B 5 Hauer's 4th
8302 John Sexton 1286 Jasper Rd. House $ 57 , 500
L 37 B 5 Hauer's 4th
8303 Adolfson & Peterson MN Valley Mall Alt. $ 358, 000
8304 Greystone Const. 1803 Eagle Crk. Blvd. Footing $ 30, 000
8305 Logeais Homes 1191 Murphy Court House $ 55, 000
L 14 B 4 Heritage Place
8306 Engco Cont. 1010 W. 6th Ave. Addn. $ 97 , 230
8307 G. F. Juergens 1053 S. Legion Addn. $ 20, 00
8308 Brian Lusignan 1308 W. 10th Ave. Addn. $ 2, 100
8309 Novak-Fleck 1201 Minnesota St. House $ 64 ,725
L 9 B 2 Meadows 1st
8310 Hiltner & Son 1100 Legion St. House $ 75 , 000
L 4 B 3 Prairie Estates
8311 Gardner Bros. 1889 Heritage Drive House $ 61, 400
L 4 B 1 Heritage Place
8312 Gardner Bros. 2022 Heritage Drive House $ 79, 800
L 27 B 4 Heritage Place
8313 EZ Construction Minnesota Valley Mall Remodel $ 10, 000
8314 Douglas Theis 2134 Muhlenhardt Road Fireplace $ 7, 500
8315 Chris Thompson 831 Prairie Street Deck $ 960
8316 Howard Gerholz 714 East 1st Avenue Garage $ 10, 000
8317 Thomas Eiecker 1005 Minnesota Street Fence $ 150
8318 Dale Dahlke 2710 Jade Circle House $ 108 , 000
L 7 B 6 Hauer's 4th
8319 Novak-Fleck 1152 Minnesota Street House $ 77, 300
L 34 B 3 Meadows 1st
8319 Don Hennen 435 West 5th Ave. Demolition$ 300
8320 Terrill Roquette 1004 Merritt Street Fence $ 500
8320 Shirley Rein 735 S. Holmes Remodel $ 3 , 000
8321 Evelyn Cox 715 S. Holmes Deck $ 650
8323 Earl Johnson 1116 Harrison Deck $ 410
8324 Novak Fleck 1159 Minnesota Street House $ 65,000
L 5 B 2 Meadows 1st
8325 Novak Fleck 1113 Minnesota Street House $ 65, 000
L 3 B 1 Meadows 1st
8326 Michael Menke 1279 Emerald Lane House $ 85, 000
L 15 B 5 Hauer's 4th
8327 Joe Zlotkowski 635 E. 8th Avenue Deck $ 500
8328 Troy Boegeman 612 E. 8th Avenue Garage $ 5,900
y
Minutes of the Downtown Ad Hoc Committee
City Council Chambers
Shakopee, MN
June 21, 1989
Chairperson Keen called the meeting to order at 7:50 A.M. with
the following persons present: Gary Laurent, Melanie Kahleck,
Terry Forbord, Ruben Ruehle, Jim Stillman, Mary Keen, Charlie
Fonder and Theresa Roehrich. Also present was Barry Stock,
Administrative Assistant and Councilman Zak. Commissioner
Wermerskichen was absent.
Chairperson Keen welcomed Theresa Roehrich and Charlie Fonder as
the two newest members of the Downtown Committee.
Chairperson Keen questioned if there were any additions to the
agenda. Forbord/Kahleck moved to approve the agenda as
submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
Laurent/Stillman moved to approve the minutes of the May 10, 1989
meeting as kept. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Stock stated that several months ago the City initiated a
property inventory of the downtown area. The data collected so
far included information on the following: Market values per
square foot, net and gross property tax per square foot, building
location, historical significance, and overall building
condition.
Mr. Stock stated that much of the information gathered at this
point is statistical and factual. However, some of the
information is purely subjective in nature. For example, when
ranking historical significance, much of what can be determined
as historical rests in the eye of the beholder. Mr. Stock stated
that he generally dated all buildings built before 1920 as having
a high degree of historical significance. Anything constructed
between 1920 and 1950 has a medium level of historical
significance and any thing after 1950 as having no historical
value. Mr. Stock then went through his ranking of the key
intersections in the downtown area in terms of location when the
mini by-pass is complete. Mr. Stock noted that he felt that the
intersection of Lewis Street and First Avenue would be the key
intersection because it would be located at the bridge head.
Mr. Stock noted that he ranked the intersection of Holmes and
First Ave. as the second best intersection followed by the
Sommerville/First Ave. intersection.
Commissioner Kahleck questioned whether or not the areas in which
people could enter into the downtown area off of the mini by-pass
would be more critical than the Lewis/First Avenue intersection.
Mr. Stock stated that he felt those two areas were important but
1
that the Lewis/First Avenue intersection served as the focal
point of the entire downtown area due to it's proximity to the
bridge head. Commissioner Forbord questioned what's staff
evaluation of the intersections was based on. Mr. Stock stated
that his locational decisions were based on the current use of
the properties in the downtown area, and shopping patterns in
downtown shopping and the view of the Downtown Area from persons
traveling on the mini by-pass.
Commissioner Forbord stated that he was surprised to hear that
there would not be egress out of the downtown area on the Western
side of the by-pass. Commissioner Stillman stated that he was
always under the impression that there would only be ingress on
the Western side of the by-pass. Commissioner Forbord asked
staff to clarify if there would be a stop light intersection at
Fuller Street. Staff responded in the affirmative. Commissioner
Forbord then stated that there would still be egress except that
it would have to occur at Fuller Street. Staff responded in the
affirmative. Discussion ensued on staff's ranking of the
intersections in the downtown area in regard to locational
importance.
Commissioner Kahleck questioned the importance of ranking the
intersections in terms of their locational consideration. She
stated that in her opinion the main area of focus would be
whatever the City of Shakopee wants it to be. Mr. Stock stated
that determining which areas were key in terms of location played
a role in determining which property would receive a higher
ranking in terms of acquisition, condemnation, demolition and/or
rehabilitation.
Commissioner Forbord stated that he disagreed with Ms. Kahleck in
that he did not think the City could decide which intersection
would be the key intersection just because that's what they
wanted. He noted that there are many components that should be
evaluated to determine which area would be utilized as the key
focal point of the downtown area. Many of those components the
City of Shakopee has no control over and therefore it makes it
very difficult to determine what area would be considered the key
intersection or area in the downtown. Commissioner Forbord
stated that the property inventory should also acknowledge the
property owners willingness to sell as well as physical
constraints that may exist with some of the properties downtown.
He noted that the original downtown concept plan talked about
critical entry points into the downtown area as well as a focal
point. He felt that the Committee could identify a number of key
areas that might work well as key points of arrival.
Commissioner Stillman stated that he felt that the bridge head
would be the key point of arrival into the community because
traffic from three directions would meet at that location.
2
v
Commissioner Keen stated that at the Sommerville and First Avenue
intersection there would be both ingress and egress and therefore
more traffic than the Holmes and First Avenue intersection. She
questioned if that should be ranked higher than the Holmes/First
Avenue intersection. Mr. Stock stated that what Ms. Keen had
stated was correct but that he felt the Holmes Street/First
Avenue intersection would be more attractive due to the
pedestrian underpass in that area as well as the traffic
generators (Marquette Bank) that are located in close proximity
to that intersection.
Commissioner Kahleck stated that another reason for making the
First Avenue/Lewis Street intersection the key intersection was
because people heading across the bridge would need to see
something that would welcome them and encourage them to enter
into the downtown area.
Commissioner Forbord suggested that one of the factors that
should be considered in weighing which parcels should serve as
key entry points is the travelers view and feeling about the
properties in the downtown area.
Commissioner Kahleck questioned what would be located North of
the area in which the five houses presently sit that will be
removed. Mr. Stock stated that North of the mini by-pass on the
East end is Huber Park. Mr. Stock stated that this area will
hopefully be landscaped in conjunction with the completion of the
mini by-pass. He stated that this will provide an ascetically
pleasing entry point into the downtown area.
Mr. Stock then went through his preliminary ranking of the
properties in the downtown area in terms of acquisition,
condemnation, relocation, and rehabilitation. Mr. Stock stated
that based on the preliminary analysis of the information
gathered to date, he has found that if one keeps in mind the
mission of the Downtown Committee was to create a historic river
town atmosphere, that the Gene Brown lot and property located on
Block 24 ranks highest in terms of demolition. The City Hall
block would seem to rank highest in terms of historic
preservation. Mr. Forbord requested staff to clarify what he
meant by rehabilitation and the historic preservation of the City
Hall block. Mr. Stock simply stated that the facades located on
the City Hall block do have some historic integrity which is
applicable to the historic river town theme. He noted that
perhaps the facades could be maintained and the buildings from
the facade back could be rehabilitated or perhaps demolished.
Commissioner Forbord stated that he felt one of the priorities of
the Downtown Committee was to create usable retail space. He
doubted whether the buildings located on the City Hall block
could be restored to meet that criteria. Discussion ensued on
the historical value of the properties in the downtown area.
3
Commissioner Forbord suggested that staff get in contact with the
consultant who is completing the Comprehensive Plan to see what
ideas he has for the downtown area in terms of it's market
viability.
Commissioner Fonder stated that in his opinion the main objective
of the Downtown Committee's plan should be to create usable
retail space no matter what the outcome is. If some historical
buildings have to suffer as a result of the ultimate goal to
create usable retail space then so be it. He stated that we may
be making it more complicated than what we need to by evaluating
all these factors. The key issue is to get people into the
downtown area and the only way to do that is with useable retail
space. He stated that if our end product happens to look like a
river town that would be great but that if it gets to be
economically unfeasible then we have to reevaluate our original
mission.
Commissioner Kahleck suggested that we focus on the four blocks
in the downtown area (Blocks 4, 23, 24 & 3) and develop a plan
for those blocks. It was the consensus of the Committee to
narrow the focus of the property inventory to the four blocks as
suggested by Ms. Kahleck.
Mr. Stock then shared with the Committee a property acquisition
and condemnation policy that had been adopted by the Shakopee
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in 1986. He noted that the
policy sets forth a process in which acquisition and condemnation
proceedings would occur by the City. He suggested that the
Committee review the policy and make suggestions and/or
amendments where necessary. Commissioner Forbord questioned what
type of appraiser would be hired by the City. Mr. Stock stated
that an M.I.A. appraiser would be the normal qualifications of
the appraisor to be solicited by the City. Commissioner Forbord
stated that there are several different qualifications for
appraisors and appraisor guidelines. He stated that the type of
guidelines the City wants followed should be clarified in the
policy. Mr. Stock stated that this could be done and would be
incorporated into the policy. Mr. Stock stated if there were no
other changes to the policy that no additional action was
required by the Downtown Ad Hoc Committee.
Mr. Stock then gave a brief report on the development status of
Arnie's Bar. Mr. Stock noted that the property owners are in the
process of bringing the property up to code and intend on
reopening it as a bar. Councilmember Zak stated that the
property owners have received Council endorsement of their
project and they will be proceeding with the improvements in the
near future.
Mr. Stock also reported that an upholstery shop was being located
in the Hergott building on the West end of the city Hall block.
4
J
Mr. Stock noted that this would be the first time in five years
that all the buildings on the North side of First Avenue in the
City Hall block were occupied at one time.
Mr. Stock then shared with the Committee the highway project
update. Mr. Stock stated that there was an error in the timing
status of the Downtown Mini By-Pass as listed in the memo. He
noted that the project would be starting in 1991 and completed in
1993 . Mr. Stock also shared with the Committee a memo from Dave
Hutton regarding the mini by-pass and a second BEBO on the East
end of the mini by-pass.
Kahleck/Laurent moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:10 A.M. Motion
carried unanimously.
Barry A. Stock
Recording Secretary
5
; 5
MINUTES
OF THE
SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in regular
session on June 29, 1989 at 4:30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting
room.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Kirchmeier, Cook and
Kephart. Also Liaison Wampach, Manager Van Hout and Secretary
Menden.
Motion by Cook, seconded by Kephart that the minutes of
the June 5, 1989 regular meeting be approved as kept. Motion
carried.
BILLS READ:
City of Shakopee 20,032.00
A & K Construction 43,882.30
Bentz Construction 96.00
Border States Electric Supply 578.20
Bro-Tex, Inc. 43. 16
Business Outfitters, Inc. 50.97
C & H Carpenter Lumber 30. 35
Chaplin Publishing, Co. 45.90
City of Shakopee 721.84
Clay's Printing Service, Inc. 52.75
Feed-Rite Controls, Inc. 85.00
General Office Products Co. 257.43
Glenwood Inglewood 9.25
Gopher State One Call, Inc. 330.00
Graybar Electric Co. , Inc. 3, 190.62
H & C Electric Supply 1,207.50
Hennen's ICO 34.33
Jaspers Stree£land and Co. 7,280.00
Kress and Monroe Chartered Law Office 581 .00
Leef Bros. , Inc. 22.50
Vincent Marschall 154. 32
Minnesota Valley Testing Laboratories 30.00
Ted Neisen 370.45
Northern States Power Co. 2,346.39
Northern States Power Co. 332.32
Precision Metal Fabricators 32.76
Reynolds Welding Supply Co. 6.82
Safety Test Equipment Co. , Inc. 202.20
Shakopee Postmaster 31000.00
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 139.86
Shakopee Services 33.00
Simon Midwest, Inc. 677.75
Southwest Suburban Publishing, Inc. 146.17
Sport About 229,20
Starks Cleaning Services, Inc. 68.00
T & R Service 180.00
Total Tool 1,890.71
Uniforms Unlimited 62.10
United Compucred Collections, Inc. 225.00
Valley Industrial Propane, Inc. 22.05
Lou Van Hout 995.35
Water Products Company 380.00
Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. 1,837. 30
WordPerfect Corporation 15.00
Yarusso Hardware 73.37
Motion by Kephart, seconded by Cook that the bills be allowed
and ordered paid including the Northern States Power co. energy
bill upon the perusal of the Manager. Motion carried.
Mr. Dick Riebs, from Riebs Consulting firm was present to
present to the Commission a proposal on load management. A
slide presentation followed. A decision on the load management
program was tabled until the August meeting.
Mr. Bill Theis, ABM Equipment was present to discuss some
complications in the bids received for a small bucket truck
with an aerial lift.
Motion by Cook, seconded by Kephart that the low bid from
Truck Utilities be excluded due to the bid not meeting the
given specifications and is deficient and the award be given to
the next lowest bidder, ABM Equipment in the amount of 940,457.00
for a small bucket truck with an aerial lift. Motion carried.
Ken Adolf, Schoell and Madson was present to give the progress
on the installation of Well R8. Plans are for the well to be in
operation by July 4, 1989.
A communication from the Jaycees thanking us for including a
stuffer in regards to their sand box fill was acknowledged.
A communication thanking Manager Van Hout and crew with the
Community Youth Bldg was acknowledged. There will be an open house
on July 26, 1989 at the Community Youth Bldg.
President Kirchmeier reported to the Commission on the meeting
held with the City Administrator, City Engineer, Council members,
Manager Van Bout, Senior Water Systems Operator and himself.
Certain policies were addressed as to cost sharing and project
initiation. The entire agenda was not completed and another
meeting will be set.
Liaison Wampach gave his report.
A Joint meeting with the City Council was requested for July
18, 1989.
The timing for the downtown street lighting was questioned.
Manager Van Hout informed Mr. Wampach that there was a relatively
complex control system for the timing of the street lights.
Manager Van Hout told the Commission that the recommendation
of the Engineer from H.D.R. Inc. was to hold off on the awarding
of the bid for the electric lines for the second feed from Blue
Lake until the right of way is formally established. There is an
easement forthcoming from the Cretex Corporation which had not been
received at the present time. The opening of the bids were held
on June 29, 1989.
Manager Van Hout also reported on a cost overrun from H.D.R.
Inc. A detailed account of the overrun was contained in a letter
from H.D.R. , Inc.
Motion by Cook, seconded by Kirchmeier to allow the overage
of 67, 900.00 above the estimate of 928,000.00 paid to H.D.R. for
the Engineering on the new feeder bay Line. Motion carried.
Commissioner Kephart abstained.
The curtailable load status was reported by Manager Van Rout.
A meeting had been held with responsible parties from Canterbury
Downs and St. Francis Hospital attending. The load curtailment
will take place immediately with a trial run extending from July
1 to October 1, 1989.
Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Kephart to authorize
Manager Van Rout to sign the agreement with Northern States Power
Co. to possibly curtail our loads . Motion carried.
Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Cook to recognize and
commend our Shakopee Public Utilities Manager, Lou Van Rout
who has become the new President for the Minnesota Municipal
Utilities Association. Motion carried.
f-
The legislative task force on Service Territories was
discussed. A new task force has been developed to look into the
service territory issue.
The Minnesota Department of Health report was given to
the Commission regarding the wells of the Shakopee Public Utilities
Commission.
Motion by Kephart, seconded by Cook to accept the report of
the Minnesota Department of Health and note that our water quality
meets all State standards . Motion carried.
The new owners of the Canterbury Inn have met all requirements
at the present time regarding signing up for their electric and
water service.
The bill for Atwood Street received from the City Engineer was
presented to the Commission. Clarifications of costs were broken
down on the bill .
A letter will be forwarded to the City Engineer breaking out
the costs that the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission have
agreed to.
A bill for the Downtown Conduit installed during the downtown
renovation was also presented by Manager Van Hout. A letter will
also be forwarded to the City Engineer regarding the feelings of
the Commission on the billing for the conduit.
An employment agreement is to be worked out mutually between
the Commission and Manager Van Hout.
Motion by Kephart, seconded by Kirchmeier to table the five
year plan to a special meeting to be held on July 17, 1989.
Motion carried.
A letter from Julius Collar regarding the Lenzmeier property
on East Fourth Avenue watermain was presented to the Commission.
A history of the assessments on the property were given.
Motion by Kephart, seconded by Kirchmeier to direct staff to
prepare an agreement with the owners of the Lenzmeier property to
go ahead and negotiate service on the determined area and not
affecting the rest of the area. Motion carried.
1
President Kirchmeier directed Manager Van Hout to look into
the status of the joint pole agreement with United Cable
Television.
There were no new plats for June, 1989.
There were no lost time accidents for June, 1989.
There were two fire calls for a total man hours of 1 hour and
10 minutes.
Motion by Kephart, seconded by Kirchmeier that the meeting be
adjourned to July 17, 1989 special meeting. Motion carried.
The next regular meeting of the Shakopee Public Utilities
will be held on August 7, 1989.
Barbara Menden Office Supervisor .
WWWWWWWWWW WWWWFWFW�WWWWWWWWWWW WWw T
NNYNYUNNNN WWWWWWWWWW �'�' NNO aC
V➢WNr OIOm OJb f 01�OJNpWN,-O w e00bwVWNHWNN➢WNrOmmv E NN OO �O
m9UD9TmND< N AD03N9V2rU r „O��+NTN£3AmTOmmrntin0 ti rTo C „
nNr...OD S 000~0000'4 p ZtirmTmrCO�"�^T„DADD D a�;m y0
-.1>.,
m DOCCODrr30D m by O>mm£rOCrr002Tp0D00 m Obz
D-ImT 22my�4m Vi4mnti O nDmyAr23rrAoacrnrr Nn <
N N ZAZm A r rm 2r' D0O O OmAmm U ➢
2 OyOAmm-t 0 N01m mmyU r tia v2”ri-im rA $rr m 0 O
AT'$2 m<UT O I > S mp0 m $nOIO Pm`422D-1Pti TTDT DM m
OT TmDATtiD G OmA2£tiNDOa N OTC 00 000�ti OraApO O<
TNOOO ZZAD�A4 TY 2 ODO3V' ADtiD O<-1D2 (O 2ZUb' OmVmDr£D„3DrT9T moDmZ�04D2➢2 0TCI4 tia�b+tAH m
- Xmoam-mY0
N2
m TtiOm3irti -4 0m v2 ti4 TT 0......O Xvi 9D D
TiCUTT AD Dim DU 9 CWm TI4yTN9AAr�40T222N
U<3TmmUWI Z XvN T b OO. T334nrNm=; 3 -. O
vmnmmm0m ti 0 YYD O -�0A A�4..n Tr4 UU'nD C OT
�A az a 0 WL]ti
m
U M MT M�11Tzz UmmM „A zc
0 <Or < a O r L m bVIz mLJ M.
A z
oom y y y m-1 -1 mm bti mT O
0 oTm O D U O N N» U Ur U2
z N TTN 0 N U ti
O Nm C T O O
$ N
C D N
N ti
m N O
N
A
G
m
z
c
mo
c
W Nr A
O Wb Om WW A
_ m
VNw WN N � .b WNmW wWW J0 N N b m
NO.bNW w N➢ W ➢pWrAwNN w�-
00 U m➢N nZ
UYOJNm Nw A N ✓'N WOmti bw NtiN O G
Y
ooaa0 oo Oww A OOOOOOObN. N 000000000NNO 00000.00 ... C m
OOOONOOOb. N 0000000.00 OOO000O00
ONO00000000 r Opti D
r3 z
o c
z m
ti
<2 A
D
n m
z
n o
m
y
0
y
dANwNO NO O w NO pN00 N Nw➢
W0ON000 00 U000
oo0o00000 0 0000
0O
.0. o0a 00 0 0000 00 0000000 0 000. bb 000.
000000e0oo b
mm
o Oo o 00000ao 0 000000o00oa00000a000 . 000 z
000000000. o Oo.00o0Ooo 0 Oo0.000.000 O0.000000 0 000 m
N D
N �
UrrNrONTb N p Om AwN 'T
WNNmrNNNA W O m V WON➢vWPO m�WO mmA N
b(O rI...OmN A bP➢ 0 .mmWrOWJN m F'O bHm D-1
ONWbOmOOw O O mO OfONmV. . N .. w.-m n0 0
OOJOINOVONJ 000000 OfONO OOOOONNN.NO0.0.0...0 . Olwm C T
OONrOONOVm N ODOOOOONOO �' 000000000.000000.000 .➢b DO
D J
N �� NAwNN m .v~ m 10
w 00b G
NNOw.NPN11, 00 NHNO'-w A
OtiOmwWNOWV m A. ONOOOb JNwNOIw VwvJ �- wWNNFo NNW
OO.WOOrOmW O 00 OwOO.0 ~000.0... U O D
OONWUONOJN OOOOOOOONO 00000... 001-'0 N0 Am0 Z
OO N1000NO.N ' OOOOOOOm00 OOOOOOOO...00lO..00000W000 m
10WPmNW Y> N� ➢ VNOI'-wWm �NbN wP
PNmO.. 0
wWUJNJ .W A O Wf0 m Nb Om NfOwNN r W.PA . Ow% y F
WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW T
WW NNNNNNNN DC
�O mNNN� OZ
+ 00 ...... WAwrO p0 W
O
y TA •+ r•Om➢Z O O 2 „x2 Ai;iE 0, 0w0. C2 ZO •+
➢ CD W N22rY A A D YYpTNN-D,M.OZAANmQ Y Y
2 02 0 pYYmm C2CCp3�'•Nmm0 mpr£ a C
N W A Y Y m DOm 3N O.S O m2m� 0 O
pm m A •aN2 O .01 902 mo O
m Om Im TW N mM2tiAOz
D >CY .,OoOrmO
Z 21 T "0-0Nwo> oo
O OG ow "Z2,<
O 00 NOmZ
TNS
ONODNSD 9D D
O W C C2 C NpR10�"•w o9 P$m m Nr S
C N NN W m Y
0AN O
y y O m>Oo0W .1.0
mA OT
O z pzr � mp z
0 0 < 200c 3m < >z, ZZ z
z
n z mom O zm< o
N
(l <VN p O 0 na mo
r m 0
Y ZZ C m NN
C CN N
N
m
N
Y
C
m0
C
W A
m N N 2
O O W fOm A
0 o w NY moNLr V1L wr m
fp W W NO O O •CNNW NWNNA ti0 DZ
r0 O O 0 -00 WPW AN O Q
yy
O 00 A NOOOm A A ~0000 V1-ANOAJOOWNO C m
Y O 00 000000NrrO00mOOti00 �; Z
0 C
q m
<2 2
D
A m
D_ 9
O O
m 2
y
O
A m
N N
O N y
ANOwr
WO O N O OO O N000 NO O A
W m m0 O O O O O O N ON000000 0000 O
A P AO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 0000 O m
. . . . . . . . 0000 . . . . . . . . . . . .
0 0 0o a 00000 0 0 0 000000000000000000 z
0 0 00 0 00000 O o 0 0000000000000WoOoo m
m
' a
VO A O w�WP WNmW~NWv '-Na DY N
AN W W WAmJmwVa mWNO 0O 0
O 00 F mNOOm WWNOO W�PNOm000W V•O C T
W o 00 o W000J m m .- rwuoWaoo J.-.-oo•-moPJWN n
0
a �
W AW N NW�-J m W
0
. V �-N NN WO O WWWmAmN �-m•- D
WO Om VOONr J N NN AWNOmmNA A
O NO ANON- O O APmJrJVAO�-W v0
n
O 00 J �NOO�' WWADOOIWOVW 2
O 00 O OOOm NOmmOO J.•-...00...WWWN O D
O O P W0
m W m J W W A A N N OWrJWW m Om O O
y v
P P AAA ApAApPAAHHAAAAA PPAPPPA
HpYYWWWWWWYYWWWNNNNNN ♦-r rr��..I..p.♦..n..�...x.� DC
"O m.-w..O...NWNNrrrpWLI NI-�- NmUAAppWYN�-O OZ
x N ♦ O + px.w + WtiN♦-OOOO00 N
a Y ti O 009 - ON /ON C
D D „CmCOmtig $Ommmmm<➢Z<➢ Z
O
n3i D x9.11 NAAT$$wNNDrNOLJODCNtiA9 9 A➢ZZZaTr<mr -Ir -�
ti N N ➢ w ati2 r OmSNm N1-IatiT9D OI-Tr90A➢C O 3xl---ID'-IaPl. m <
OyDpm -�D rll-i0-1 N0 N 0� Z 9 SOOO 1-1 1+ O T
D 9 CN m $ 1-Z. OM8,03Z11TT D 02 ZZZ XTOmm NT
Z Z Z 1 m N ➢ OU2 T00Pm On'In'IDDOC N KNPNUN N N oz
m N 1 ZCNCO Nm 2rOti1-1 m3 r 3 1 1 0 T N
aqO P NNWm WN ----23f D N 0�3m9 -� 1 WTT rya x
N ti OCT OTT NN C ZD2IDNY $Oti Tl-11-i 4CC 9D D
c0
9W 00LJ 1+ m m Y39+1O Ta0 3timCr tim S
➢ Z W m N0 aW CN Fy1Aa < m� D 9;yCC OT O
Z O 33C x WI+ 11N ti 0
Ni- m m 1 G D 9N rN rD O�+i-In 91 - $C
-I $ZC -1ti0 ti Tm CC m 3 a
T
a C ti0 m T S NT N< 9 WN N 9 m- _
NNm
'-Im O
N i-1 00 x$ n a CC
N 2 N N 20 1+0 TO
N 0 NO Zm 0 DD
0.
N N W ON n ZZ
a Z 00
y mm
N
D
9
a
O
9
A
n
ti
O
20
C
A N WJ N A W "A
C IG rP rl� NO O NY
W W N100 VOW O m.0. Np WN m
O O A HwVOJJNI-NNW O O-.= O ONNN VN D2
,M. O AH......0-� WOWN 0 OO OJWmO1TW O Z
JH
O O O O ONO � WONO OfOWWN'-tiHOOWONmmmN OOWUOONwFW HO C O
O O O O W OWO HOWOONrWWWNWPOJOOWOfOA 1-' OOOOONNVWOHW I3 V
O
2 C
-1 A
<x m
n
n a
m m
0
9
0 A
y
D
W 10 W WOVNV 1-w HU v
O
O O J N WO m OPUWWpWWWNOWJOW�JAU V 1-'-P OUIO P Uw 9
O O O 00 m O OJNWOPw wI-NOOJONWUOW OVNOJW ION a
O O O 00 O O OUNUOONOUtn000000000 OWOOPJ O 00
D
O O O O O 000 O 000000000000000000000 O 000000000000 H
O O O O O 000 O 000000000000000000000 O 000000000000 O
Z<
N ➢
W Nm♦-1� W NW �� w
p WTf01-NrOWwNN w m01- AN .9
WU mrp-A�NJ Nro JlowmUmHmUA J VWJm Dti N
Pp OUVJNWN O VN -U JO 0O O
0 O O O ODUI wONmwWJNWNNI�UWWwmVmYm r0000wmmVYmlT C_ - -
0 0 0 O w OPN W JOVpOO1NwmWUWpNNmHwOYW ✓ NOHUOmwVNOAN ➢ _
O
➢ V
H
O n J ~
r p10WNW�-J�-U♦-N WVOJNOIY PONU00 O OW Gm ID
m m J NO mVNNVmO1JNV ONH.N. 00 NONJWU ♦-W A
w w w WN JmmpOPWOOim Nwm-wUUmWOw ♦-OOmNW tiW '
P ANWONUJJUJWrWNNNVp1V VOOmWAO1N 10
D
J J 0 O OAN O fuOVNAONNWVVmNwOmWNN010 tir♦' wow w Z
O O O O A OWN WOWmOAmw P1�NVpmmm Wl-OI-J 10 NOwUO—oO�-P JwOO�w T m
p WpWWNOWNpJWpp pn-Wpp HUIP
O OV JOwm W�-J WmUVWJNVUVmW
m m U W U Nw W V mWNWwVOU41r V1-I�PmAwpw N NWV Jw p mf0 O
x. P
DC
OZ '
no w
0
0 0 c 0
ti� H
1 4 \ <
w O
Z 2 mp O
p O Nm T
OZ
Z 2
C
< O
2 < vD D
O T.
-� OT
O
O zc
N
D i
9
A
O
A
a
0
zo
c
A x
Po a
P o
m a nz
N C O
O O O D
r3 �
Z a
ti A
<S m
D A
2
O m
m 9
O
[J A
D
O
P O O
A
O O
D
0 0 0
0
z<
m
s
o a
n
a� N
m n
-.o 0
c
m w a
' ro
a �
<m w
n
P A
N
a
P Z
m p
TENTATIVE AGENDA
ADJ.REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AUGUST 15, 1989
Mayor Dolores Lebens presiding
1] Roll Call at 7:00 P.M.
2] Reading by Mayor Lebens of City's Non-Discrimination Policy
3] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers
4] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS
5] Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an
asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council
and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember
so requests, in which event the item will be removed from
the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence
on the agenda. )
*6] Approval of Minutes of July 18th and 21st, 1989
7] Communications:
a] James Plahn re: contribution to Mn. Rural Water Ass'n.
b] Michael P. Wandmacher, Mn. Revenue Dept. re: Shakopee
Super 8 Partnership application for reduction in assess-
ed valuation of real estate
8] PUBLIC HEARINGS: None
91 Boards and Commissions: Planning Commission Recommendations:
a] 1990-1995 Capital Improvement Program
b] Amending city code regarding animal hospitals and
veterinary clinics in the B-2 district
10] Reports from Staff:
a] McKenna Road Agreement
b] Killarney Hills Street Improvements
c] Parking Lot by Scout Building
d] Downtown Bench
e] Alley Behind City Hall
f] County Road 17 Pedestrian Underpass - memo on table
*g] Application for Temporary 3.2 Beer License by St. Mary's
*h] Application for Liquor Licenses by Corp-Tool, Inc.
*i] Diamond Court Street Construction
j ] Approve bills in amount of $318,982 . 36
k] MEBCO Contract for Private Development & Amendment #1
*1] Senior Community Services Employment Program
TENTATIVE AGENDA
August 15, 1989
Page -2-
11] Resolutions and Ordinances:
*a] Res. No. 3071, Adopting Assessments for the Downtown
Streetscape, Project No. 1987-2
b] Res. No. 3100, Accepting Bid on the 1989 Pavement
Preservation Project-Sealcoat, Project No. 1989-10
c] Res. No. 3101, Accepting Bids on Lions Park Pond,
Project No. 1989-11 - memo on table
*d] Res. No. 3102, Approving Plans for Market Street and
Alleys, Project No. 1988-6
*e] Res. No. 3103, Accepting A Report & Calling A Hearing on
Bluff Avenue, Project No. 1989-12
f] Ord. No. 270, Enacting A Sidewalk Inspection, Repair,
and Replacement Policy
g] Ord. No. 271, Amending Minimum Fee for On-Sale Liquor
Licenses
h] Ord. No. 272, Amending Ord No. 266 by Repealing Section
12.12 of Chapter 12 of the City Code
12] Other Business:
a] Reconsider Res. No. 3081, Setting Proposed Maximum 1989 Tax Levy,
Collectible in 1990
b] Authorize Hiring of Two Police Officers
c] Conduit Extension — 3rd Avenue
13] Adjourn
d] Ord. No. 273, DANGEROUS ANIMALS
Dennis R. Kraft
City Administrator
6
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ADJ.REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JULY 18, 1989
Acting Mayor Clay called the meeting to order at 5:30 P.M. with
Cncl. Zak, Wampach, vierling and Scott; and Shakopee Public
Utilities Commissioners Barry Kirchmeier, Jim Cook and Jim
Kephart present. Mayor Lebens was absent. Also present were
Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator, Lou Van Hout, SPUC Manager,
Dave Hutton, City Engineer, and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk.
Barry Kirchmeier, President, SPDC, gave a brief overview of what
has happened during the past year. There have been no increases
in electric service to customers. They have adopted a new policy
to look at the watermain and consider modernizing and upgrading
it anytime the city is doing a reconstruction project. Because
of this new policy, the water rates will have to be upgraded in
the future. They are continuing to maintain a modern and viable
utility. They have recently completed construction of Well y8.
When designing wells, they are making sure that they are drawing
water from more than one aquifer. They have recently awarded the
contract and construction should start soon on the new feeder
line coming in from the Blue Lake sub-station from Northern
States Power. Completion is estimated around December.
SPUC is replacing the watermain within the 3rd Avenue
reconstruction project and any deficient services on that line.
They are also replacing the watermain along Fuller between 3rd
and 4th and are installing a new watermain in Market Street when
it is constructed. The pole yard in the industrial park has been
screened in.
SPUC is pursuing service territory acquisition which will be
addressed later on in the meeting. SPUC is also providing
resources to the citizens of Shakopee. Their electric
contribution this past year was $329,000 plus a water
contribution of $88,000 with a combined total of $418,087. In
addition they have provided free electric service in the amount
of $27,000 and they have maintained the city street lights in an
amount equal to $17,000.
Pres. Kirchmeier explained that SPUC has changed their policy so
that anytime the City reconstructs a street, they want to
seriously look at the watermain and any deficient water services.
If they can determine that they are deficient, they would like to
follow the example they have agreed to do on the 3rd Avenue
project. As long as the City is reconstructing the street, they
will pay for materials and installation for the watermain and the
City will pay for the street. Dave Hutton's memo dated June 18,
1989 (Doc No. CC-169) does accurately summarize the agreement for
replacing the watermain in 3rd Avenue, as discussed in recent
meetings with representatives from SPUC and the City.
Proceedings of the City Council
July 18, 1989 Page -2-
Pres. Kirchmeier reviewed the summary of meetings between SPDC
and City representatives prepared by Lou Van Hout dated June 18,
1989 (Doc No. CC 170) . A group recommendation is that when there
is a need to relocate, payment is based on the principal of
causation. Whichever agency requires the move or reconstruction,
that agency pays. The use of connectors on service lines will be
decided by SPUC. Staff will work on a list of criteria for
determining deficient facilities. SPUC makes the ultimate
determination on whether or not to replace its own system.
The group agreed that if the City requested a pole relocation,
the cost would be a 50/50 split. For the downtown project, the
second phase would be handled the same as the first phase with
cost to relocate poles repaid to SPUC.
With regard to contract administration/inspections, the group
recommendations were that SPUC has the total say on watermains;
that the SPUC inspector may issue a stop work order on a City
contract without going through the City's project coordinator and
the City would not overrule that order; three part memo's would
be used to document instructions to contractors with copies to
the City's project coordinator and to SPUC; and that there would
be regular meetings between the SPUC Manager and the City
Engineer during the construction season.
Pres. Kirchmeier stated that the group had general discussion on
design and private subdivision work and he did not go into the
discussion. He stated that the group agreed that the City would
not enter into any agreement with a developer on behalf of SPUC
dealing with oversizing. The developer would deal directly with
SPUC. Regarding downtown underground conduits, the conduit and
underground work would be by the City and the electrical
equipment would be by SPUC. With this arrangement the City and
SPUC will have shared in the costs for electric undergrounding.
Pres. Kirchmeier explained that it has been a long time joint
goal between Shakopee Public Utilities and the City to acquire
the electrical service territory within the City limits belonging
to the Minnesota Valley Electrical Coop. He brought the Council
up to date on the status and asked Council to adopt a resolution
supporting the acquisition.
Pres. Kirchmeier explained that the costs for the acquisition
would not be directly subsidized by existing customers. The
first million dollars would come from interest earned on
investments and the balance would come from revenue generated
from the customers within the area acquired. He explained that
SPUC would establish a dual rate structure and that the new
customers within the acquired area would receive a rate 20%
higher than other customers; which rate would still be 202 less
than what they are now paying. This would be effective for a
specified time only.
Proceedings of the City Council
July 18, 1989 Page -3-
He explained that they propose that the people paying the dual
rate would not be included, during the time period of payoff, in
the formula for which SPUC contributes to the City. If this is
accepted by the City, it would not affect the City's present
contribution from SPDC in anyway.
Cncl. Vierling asked SPUC to keep the City updated on their
progress.
Pres. Kirchmeier summarized a letter from Krass & Monroe, dated
April 24, 1989 (Doc No. CC-171) stating that SPUC is in
compliance with MSA 412.141 and that . the City Treasurer has a
right to canceled checks, which they have never disputed. The
City Treasurer has been advised that he can have access to them
at anytime.
A motion was made by Shakopee Public Utilities Commissioners that
SPUC would present upon request, or make available upon request,
all their canceled checks to the City Treasurer. The motion was
carried.
Vierling/Zak moved to recess the Council meeting at 6:28 P.M.
Motion carried unanimously.
Judith S. Cox
Recording Secretary
Vierling/Wampach moved to reconvene at 7:15 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
Wampach/Vierling moved to recess to Housing and Redevelopment
Authority Meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Wampach moved to reconvene to City Council at 7:35 p.m.
Motion carried unanimously.
Liaison reports were given by councilmembers.
Chairman Clay asked if there was anyone present who wished to
address anything not on the agenda. There was no response.
Vierling/Wampach moved to approve the consent business.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous
Noes: None Motion carried.
vierling/Wampach offered Resolution No. 3089, A Resolution of
Appreciation to Thomas G. Brownell for Outstanding and Dedicated
Service as Shakopee's Chief Law Enforcement Officer, and moved
for its adoption. Acting Mayor Clay read the Resolution. Motion
carried unanimously.
Proceedings of City Council
July 18, 1989 Page -4-
Vierling/Zak offered Resolution No. 3087, A Resolution of
Appreciation to Coralee Hullander and moved for its adoption.
Motion carried unanimously.
Wampach/Vierling offered Resolution No. 3088, A Resolution of
Appreciation to Earl Fleck for Outstanding Service and Leadership
to the City of Shakopee, and moved for its adoption. Motion
carried unanimously.
Vierling/Wampach moved to acknowledge receipt of a letter dated
July 7, 1989 from Hygenic Service Systems, Inc. regarding the
decision not to appear on the City Council agenda on July 18,
1989. (Motion approved under consent business) .
Vierling/Wampach moved to table item 8B, a letter from Eugene
Pearson, to item 9, proposed assessments for Downtown Streetscape
Project, on the agenda. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Zak moved to receive and file with regrets the letter
from Shakopee School District #720 stating their decision not to
participate in the Joint Property Tax Analysis Study at this
time. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Administrator introduced a letter from William Laing,
Marquette Bank of Shakopee regarding the property owner of the
Shenandoah Ballroom. Discussion followed.
Vierling/Wampach moved to approve the application and grant an om
sale non intoxicating liquor license to Damile, Inc. , 2400 East
4th Avenue. Motion carried with Cncl. Scott opposed.
Chairman Clay opened the continuation of the public hearing on
the proposed special assessments for the Downtown Streetscape
Phase I, Parts 1 and 2, Project No. 1987-2.
Barry Stock reviewed the background of the special assessments on
the Downtown Streetscape Project. He said the City Council
originally voted to defer single family and 2 family residential
units from the assessment, and that the proposed assessment
resolution has a 10 year deferment period added instead of
leaving it open. The City Council also elected to grant a
residential credit to properties with the additional costs
associated to wider streets. All properties were granted credit
for oversizing sidewalk and curb and gutter. He reviewed the
alternatives available: eliminate the deferment policy and
maintain credit policy; maintain deferment policy for a 10 year
period with property owners paying interest; or maintain
deferment policy for a 10 year period with property owners paying
no interest. Chairman Clay asked if there was anyone from the
audience who wished to address this issue.
Joelle Sawvel, 320 E. 1st, said the downtown street improvement
Proceedings of City Council
July 18, 1989 Page -5-
does not touch her property in any way and she is being assessed.
She cannot sell her house and her street access will be taken
away from her when they build the new bridge, she will only have
alley access. The City Engineer said that staff could take a
look at eliminating the two lots in that block. She feels her
property should be exempt from any commercial taxes because she
is receiving no benefit at all. Cncl. Zak suggested that staff
look into this further and come back to the next meeting with an
alternative.
Mona Strunk asked the City Clerk how the 10 year deferment plan
works. The City Clerk said the current senior citizen hardship
special assessment deferral program is to provide deferment of
special assessments for senior citizens who meet certain
criteria. The applicant must be 65 or older and the applicant
has to be the owner of the property and it must be homesteaded.
Also the annual gross income cannot exceed the Section 8 low
income limits for the past calender year. The gross assets
cannot exceed $48,000.
Chuck Borchard, 225 Sommerville, asked why this is being
reconsidered. He was initially informed that residential
properties were going to be deferred until they became
commercial. Cncl. Vierling said that the climate in Shakopee has
changed and it is important that everyone be charged an equitable
amount. He replied that he has a cement front yard with angular
parking and feels this is unreasonable at this point in time.
Jeanette Gilles, 126 S. Atwood, asked why she is being assessed
$4,500 for $18,000 worth of work. The City Engineer replied that
the assessment procedure was based on a 70-30 split between front
foot and square foot and that was the policy used. She also asked
why the people who have access to the alley were not assessed for
the same thing. The City Engineer said the lot lines were
followed and the assessment boundaries were set on the abutting
properties on Atwood.
Denny Schmitt, 212 Atwood, asked why he received an assessment
for $4,060. The City Engineer said that an assessment for a city
sewer would make a difference. He said properties abutting 2nd
Avenue received a higher proportionate cost per foot than the
properties abutting 3rd because 3rd avenue was not done. Mr.
Schmitt said he would like to get the same price as someone else
gets. Cncl. Zak said he felt that these issues should all be
looked at and some research be done on them.
Jeanette Gilles said she received a letter saying her property
would be deferred and she intends to appeal if her assessment is
not deferred.
Proceedings of City Council
July 18, 1989 Page -6-
Consensus of the Council was to look into changing the east and
west boundaries of the assessment area to straighten the line out
and also to continue with the 10 year deferment and discontinue
credit for oversizing and nodes. Cncl. Vierling said she also
feels that Mr. Pearson should be given a credit prorated to 6
years for his sidewalk.
Vierling/Wampach moved to continue the public hearing to August
1, 1989. Motion carried unanimously.
Scott/Zak moved for a 10 minute recess. Motion carried
unanimously.
Scott/Vierling moved to reconvene at 8:50 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
The City Engineer reviewed the proposed improvements to Killarney
Hills Subdivision. He said staff has done various tables on 503,
753 and 253 special assessment. He said there are two sections
that have existing pavement already. The portion of Sharon
Parkway which has a dirt roadway will be assessed at 1003 because
that is considered a new road. He reviewed the assessments for a
new street in the different percentages of 75, 50 and 25 percent
for the areas where there is some existing pavement.
The City Engineer explained that staff contends that streets were
never built to any standards, except for erosion control, and he
feels they should be assessed as new construction or a 15.23
credit could be given for properties that do front an area which
does have pavement.
Vierling/Wampach offered Resolution No. 3059, A Resolution
Ordering an Improvement and the Preparation of Plans and
Specifications for Roadways Within Killarney Hills Addition
Namely (Sharon Parkway and Tyrone Drive) Project No. 1989-7 and
moved for its adoption. Motion carried unanimously.
Acting Mayor Clay asked if there was anyone from the audience who
wished to speak on this issue.
Al Borgen, 1447 Tyrone Drive, asked the City Engineer what the
assessment was on his property and if it was final. The City
Engineer replied that it was not final.
Roger Sames, 1359 Sharon Parkway, asked what the credit was for
the total amount of asphalt that is in place now. He said he
still has a problem with the City considering this a new road (as
opposed to reconstruction) since it has been there for 16, 17
years. He asked the City to consider picking up 753 and assessing
the residents 253.
Proceedings of City Council
July 18, 1989 Page -7-
Vierling/Wampach moved to establish an assessment policy of 100%
with a 5.2% credit for asphalt in place, for proposed
improvements to Killarney Hills. Motion failed with Cncl. Zak
and Scott opposed, Vierling and Wampach in favor, and Cncl. Clay
not voting.
Todd Bloedow, 1456 Sharon Parkway, said he believed the City
should go with 50% assessment.
Wade Kohlrush, 1440 Tyrone Drive, asked what other area in
Shakopee is equivalent to this area. The City Engineer replied
that Boiling Springs is close to this type of area and it was
assessed at 100%.
Scott/Zak moved to establish the assessment policy for Killarney
Hills improvements at 50%. Motion failed with Cncl. Vierling and
Wampach opposed, and Zak and Scott in favor, and Cncl. Clay not
voting.
Vierling/Wampach moved to table setting a policy for special
assessments in Killarney Hills. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Planner said that the Planning Commission had discussed
the possibility of providing in-house training for Planning
Commission members as well as City Council. He said approximate
cost of the training is $800.00, and there is enough in the
budget set aside for such training. He also said the Planning
Commission had considered having a sign up agenda card for public
hearings for persons who wished to speak. The consensus of the
Council was to not have a sign up for persons speaking at a
public hearing because it may be considered intimidating to some
people. The Council discussed the possibility of leaving the
training session open for other cities as well as other
committees in the City.
Vierling/Zak moved to have staff follow-up with Government
Training Services and put feelers out to the other committees and
neighboring cities to learn if they wish to participate in a
training session. Motion carried unanimously.
Zak/Vierling moved to reserve the ability to use the sign up card
system for certain classes of public hearing which may be more
involved and not use the cards routinely. Motion carried
unanimously.
The City Administrator said there has been a problem in the past
with delinquent local lodging tax payments by various motels. The
City Attorney has suggested making a fine for such delinquency.
He said there has been some that have been 3-4 months delinquent.
Proceedings of City Council
July 18, 1989 Page -8-
Vierling/Wampach moved that the proper ordinance be drafted
placing a fine on delinquent local lodging taxes at $150 for
first offense and $300 for each subsequent offense. Motion
carried with Cncl. Scott opposed.
Vierling/Scott moved to direct the City administrator to inform
Mr. Gendreau that the City is not interested in buying 100 cast
aluminum signs informing people of the City's dog walking
regulations. Motion carried unanimously.
Scott/Vierling moved to direct the City Attorney to draft the
appropriate ordinance amending city Code Section 11.02 and
Section 11.03, Subd. 3, regarding providing exclusion for lot
width and area requirements for buildings constructed with party
walls. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Wampach moved to authorize the City staff to negotiate
an appropriate screening system for Danny's construction to be
put in place on or before September 6, 1989, and if no such
system is in place by that date, to direct the appropriate City
staff to issue daily zoning violation criminal complaints against
Danny's construction beginning the 7th of September. (Motion
approved under consent business) .
Vierling/Wampach moved to declare the position of Community
Development Director vacant due to the promotion of Dennis Kraft
and authorize the Personnel Coordinator to post the vacancy and
proceed with the hiring process as defined in the Personnel
Policy. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Wampach moved to direct the City Attorney to draft the
appropriate permanent easement documents necessary to ensure the
City of Shakopee has full 80 feet of right-of-way or permanent
easement along all properties abutting 12th Avenue and Valley
Park Drive currently owned by the Scotland Companies or any of
their subsidiaries. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Zak moved to approve the bills in the amount of
$644,901.67.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous
Noes: None Motion carried.
Vierling/Wampach moved to approve the application and grant a
temporary on Sale 3.2 beer license to the Shakopee Jaycees at
Lions Park for August 5 and 6, 1989. (Motion approved under
consent business) .
Vierling/Wampach moved to approve the application and grant a
temporary On Sale 3.2 beer license to the Church of St. Mark at
the 3rd Avenue and Scott Street Playground for July 29 and 30,
1989. (Approved under consent business) .
Proceedings of City Council
July 18, 1989 Page -9-
Vierling/Wampach moved to remove from table the applications for
an On-sale, Off-sale, and Sunday Liquor Licenses for Corp-Tool,
Inc. (Motion approved under consent business) .
Vierling/Wampach moved to table the applications for an On-Sale,
Off-Sale and Sunday liquor licenses for Corp-Tool Inc. (Motion
approved under consent business) .
Vierling/Zak moved to table the Police Civil Service request for
Financial Assistance to Hire a Police Chief until August 1, 1989.
Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Wampach offered Resolution No. 3086, A Resolution
Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for
Bids for the Lions Park Pond, Project No. 1989-11, and moved for
its adoption. Motion carried unanimously.
Wampach/Vierling offered Resolution No. 3081, A Resolution
Setting Proposed Maximum 1989 Tax Levy, Collectible in 1990 and
moved for its adoption. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Scott offered Resolution No. 3082, A Resolution
Consenting to the Levy of a Special Tax by the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Shakopee and moved
its adoption. Motion carried unanimously.
Wampach/Vierling offered Resolution No. 3083, a Resolution
Directing the County Auditor not to levy a tax for Debt Service
for Selected Bond Issues and moved for its adoption. Motion
carried unanimously.
Vierling/Wampach moved to direct staff to certify to the County
Auditor a proposed General Fund Budget for 1990 in the amount of
$4,594,370.00. Motion carried unanimously..
Vierling/Wampach offered Resolution No. 3084, A Resolution of
Special Commendation to Jim Karkanen, and moved for its adoption.
(Motion approved under consent business) .
Vierling/Wampach offered Resolution No. 3985, a Resolution of
Special Commendation to John DuBois, and moved its adoption.
(Motion approved under consent business) .
Vierling/Wampach moved to set a special Council Work Session on
Friday, July 21, at 10:30 a.m. regarding City Administrator
Contract/Benefits. Motion carried unanimously.
Scott/Zak moved to set a salary for John DuBois while Acting
Chief of Police the same as Tom Brownell's, until a new chief is
hired. Motion carried unanimously.
Proceedings of City Council
July 18, 1989 Page -10-
Cncl. Vierling said she did not feel that Mr. DuBois should
necessarily get the same salary as Chief Brownell. Questions
were raised on what hours Mr. DuBois would keep while serving as
the Acting Chief of Police and would he be around on week-ends.
The City Administrator said he would get more information for the
next meeting on this issue.
Vierling/Zak moved to adjourn to Friday, July 21, at 10:30 a.m.
motion carigd uganimously. Meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
�Jlp �l
Jud
S. Cox
CO Clerk -
Carol Schultz
Recording Secretary
6
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ADJ.REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JULY 21, 1989
Mayor Lebens called the meeting to order at 10: 30 A.M. with
Councilmembers Zak, Wampach, Clay, Vierling and Scott present.
Also present were Gregg Voxland, Finance Director; Marilyn Remer,
Personnel Coordinator; and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk.
Discussion ensued on the desired contents of a contract between
the City of Shakopee and Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator.
Consensus of Council was to have no contract and that the City's
personnel policy govern conditions of employment the same as with
other employees.
Vierling/Zak moved to set the salary for Dennis R. Kraft, City
Administrator, based upon his limited experience as an
administrator, but because of his many years of city experience,
at $47,792 . 00.
Zak/Clay moved to amend the motion to include a review of Mr.
Kraft's performance in six months and upon successful performance
review that his salary be increased to $50, 603 . 00. (Mr. Kraft's
appointment date was July 11, 1989 and this will become his
anniversary date. ) Motion carried unanimously.
Motion carried unanimously on main motion as amended.
Vierling/Clay moved to reconsider the salary set for the acting
police chief. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion followed.
It was the consensus of the Councilmembers that they did not wish
to set a precedent in establishing the top step pay range for
individuals who have been appointed temporarily in an "Acting'-
capacity
Acting"capacity until a vacancy is filled. Use of a stepend to be
determined by Council was discussed. This would give them
flexibility in establishing any additional compensation for the
additional duties and responsibilities assumed in an "Acting'-
capacity.
Acting"capacity.
Clay/Vierling moved to pay Mr. DuBois, while he is acting police
chief, his standard base pay of $42 ,045. 00 plus a monthly stipend
of an additional $661.75.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous
Noes; None Motion carried
Zak/Vierling moved that staff be directed to prepare a policy
establishing a stipend for acting positions. Motion carried
unanimously.
Mr. Kraft was invited to join the Councilmembers to discuss terms
of his employment.
Proceedings of the City Council
July 21, 1989 Page -2-
Scott/Wampach moved that the City buy councilmembers lunch.
Motion failed with Councilmembers Clay, Vierling and Mayor Lebens
opposed.
Mr. Voxland, Finance Director, explained Council's offer of
compensation for the position of City Administrator to Mr. Kraft
and that Council did not wish to enter into a contract, that
instead the personnel policy and other policies of the city would
govern. Discussion followed.
Mr. Kraft questioned Council's conditions on the use of a city
car. Council agreed that the City Administrator would have
personal use of a city car outside of Shakopee and would then pay
for his own gas. They directed staff to redraft the vehicle
policy to provide for the use of a city car by the City
Administrator from home to work and for unlimited use out of town
he would pay for the gas.
Discussion ensued on the salary after a successful six month
performance review; whether or not it would be a step on the pay
plan or $50, 603. 00.
Vierling/Zak moved to reconsider the motion setting the salary
for the City Administrator. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling moved to amend the motion to state that after a
successful six month performance review Mr. Kraft's salary would
go to Step 4 of the pay plan, in place. Motion carried
unanimously.
Motion carried unanimously on the main motion as amended.
Mr. Kraft stated that he wished a performance evaluation by the
Council every six months.
Councilman Clay left the meeting at 12: 15 P.M.
Scott/Vierling moved to adjourn at 12:22 P.M. Motion carried
unanimously.
J ith S. Cox
C y Clerk
Recording Secretary
:6nnvsuta
RURAL ATEP
August 3, 1989
R7
AUCA . 39
City of Shakopee
129 E 1st Avenue
Shakopee, IAN 55379
Dear City Council ,
Our Association needs your help.
At this moment, new drinking water regulations are being written in Washington
D.C. by EPA about lead, radon, disinfection, and many others. These regulations
will affect your water system, and they will become law - with - or without -
your input. Our Association wants to take a more active role in the regulation
of our industry. To do this, we are asking for your support of 'Operation
Impact." Operation Impact will give water systems a much stronger voice in the
creation of new drinking water standards and laws.
In the last two years, we have cooperated with other state associations and the
National Rural Water Association to work with Congress to save water systems
over one billion dollars in principal through the FmlA discount repurchase
program, and approximately fifty million dollars in tax forgiveness. With your
support of Operation Impact we believe we can do much, much more.
During the past fifteen years, our industry has been largely reacting to federal
regulations. It is now time for us to take the initiative and participate far
more extensively in the regulatory process. Water utilities must reinforce
their hard earned reputation as protectors of the public health through
standards and regulations that are practical, technically sound, and affordable.
Operation Impact will give as the voice we need in Washington.
Our Association is asking for a one-time voluntary contribution from your
utility to support Operation Impact. We have enclosed a schedule of recommended
contributions based on the number of connections on your system. In this
manner, everyone can contribute their fair share.
Please read the enclosed additional information about our effort and call our
office if you have any further questions. The time for us to act is very short,
so please let us hear from you in the next few days. The sooner we can act, the
sooner we can realize the benefits!
Sincerely,
James Plahn
Program Manager
Minnesota Rural Water Association
JP/rh MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSN.
18 DIVISION ST. WEST
ELBOW LANE. MN 56531
218-685-5197
o ° 3 of ? I
fD N
I O Q R Q 'D O
v g10
m m a A c
< 3 m 1 3 3 a s
fD i sv0 3 ° pO
o ' ® m m (D 3 ° 3 3 c
zr
10- 0 0 00 c 1 of I 1391aE to . o
c n a � T � (D
5 �
i
G &r , 2 N
CL
A' � m �• � � � � m �, � � oma ,,, co a
$ oa ;. a
N
H �
i
2oc ° ocr m
N N NO N �
ON
1 C y Z y
!2 !0 d ca
•
o �
m
3
mt
� = o
ocm
ziO $
hp EP
4. h0
aV/( N h0
F-
L)
c d a cU q3 am
°°1 =° in
is ° d Y _ °. Y! C '; :�+
IL c d ; ; gym ; ;; 2'm
M
cm mm
G . ; N E' N- 9 U y
0 w 41 9m „ ° ° cm ccL
O y d y m y T E u c ° 5 m a
CLr_ ° E = mw � ayco 3d � p $ m
O myoma 2y a0 ° mc ` Ama
d 7
WE
t Q w m o m E c m m x
� � C O 0 i LLo � c ; 0. CLW -0 � a50m3
Wom't
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Mail Station 3340 AUG o *91989
St. Paul, MN 55146-3340
(612) 2%-0185 CITY OF SMAKQ.PFE
August 7, 1989
Mr.Thomas Heunen Mr. Don Martin
Scott County Auditor Scott County Assessor
Scott County Courthouse Scott County Courthouse
428 S. Holmes St. 428 S. Holmes Street
Shakopee, MN 55379 Shakopee, MN 55379
Ms. Judith Cox Clerk
Shakopee City Clerk School District #720
Shakopee City Hall 505 S. Holmes
129 E. 1st.Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379
Shakopee, MN 55379
RE:
Shakopee Super 8 Parternership
City of Shakopee, County of Scott, State of Minnesota
Application #340861
Parcel #27120 004
The above application has been filed with the Commissioner of Revenue for reduction in the
assessed valuation of certain real estate.
The application states that a reduction in the assessed valuation of the above-described
property is warranted,because:
Based upon actual incomelexpenses a reduction in the assessed valuation is justifiable.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Application #340861
August 7, 1989
Page Two
For taxes assessed in 1988 and payable in 1989.
ORIGINAL VALUES CORRECTED VALUES
MARKET VALUE TAX CAPACITY MARKET VALUE TAX CAPACITY
$1,142,800.00 $43,137.00 $858,000.00 $14,910.00
Minnesota Statutes,Section 270.19,provides that where the reduction in assessed valuation
of any property exceeds $100,000.00 and/or the reduction in tax capacity value exceeds
$12,200.00 the city, town, school district, and county in which the property is located may
request a hearing to object to the reduction. If your political subdivision desires to have a
hearing on this application, please send your request to me within 20 days.
If I receive no request for a hearing within 20 days from any of the political subdivisions
affected by the reduction,the application will be considered by the Commissioner of Revenue
on its merits.
You may phone me at (612) 296-0185 if you wish further information. You may also contact
the local assessor or county assessor if you have any questions relating to the reason for the
proposed reduction.
Sincerely, q) ' c
MICHAEL P.WANDMACHER,Director
Local Government Services Division
MPW:smcl4
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Douglas K. Wise, City Planner
RE: 1990-1995 Capital Improvement Program
DATE: August 10, 1989
INTRODUCTION•
At their meeting on August 3, 1989, the Planning Commission
passed a motion recommending to the City Council approval of the
1990-1995 Capital Improvements Program as drafted by staff.
BACKGROUND•
At their meeting on July 6, 1989, the Planning Commission
received the draft 1990-1995 Capital Improvements Program for
review. After discussion, the Planning Commission postponed
action on the Capital Improvements Program to their August 3,
1989 meeting. At their meeting on August 3 , 1989, the Planning
Commission offered and passed a motion recommending to the City
Council approval of the 1990-1995 Capital Improvements Program as
presented by staff. (Copy attached)
ALTERNATIVES•
1. The City Council can offer and pass a motion approving the
1990-1995 Capital Improvements Program as drafted.
2 . The City Council can offer and pass a motion approving the
1990-1995 Capital Improvements Program adding and/or
deleting items from the draft program recommended by the
Planning Commission.
ACTION REOUESTED:
Offer and pass a motion as recommended in either alternative #1
or #2 listed above.
Year 1 y G rand T o t a l s
J- 990 - $ 2 , 800 , 000
1 9 9 1 - $ 3 , 827 , 000
1992 - $ 3 , 803 , 500
1 9 9 3 - $ 4 , 007 , 000
J- 994 - $ 4 , 237 , 000
1995 - $ 48 , 000
o �
� o
� n
►o w
�- o
�a o.
o �
c CeD
o
� � o
b p
R.
o aro
CrQ M
,
H
v
ro
C C
.1 ro
C U
W ..�
C
� N U
(� N
H � y U E-
0
0 O Ul
W E H to
W 7 14
y > H N C W N
FFF��I Y s 0 E z 'O °
�y VI (7 h L ✓ H > C
H o > m z ro O
H H
m w O b+
� rl H ro W C
a °a x 9
-.{
O N N 0 o m
E. v c ro W
x z ro ✓
UI u
old
� mro c
a+ N H
W H W C H O N
E N H W H
3 P Q O C
m .roa
U a o 3 u E F x v
N V O [A H x
N N .0
-1
0
Cro7 h F D E h
ti Y O A u( n g rrT T
n rt u Y
=T rn^
0 0
Op
3 m
rn
O
LA
LA
1
m
0
$ c p p u a p m p D
O C r
p p O m
O NY 6
p n
o ^^z p
Ln Y' m
6 m
m
z
m
c
- o
m
5 o m
6
A
-i
3
m
z
< 3
a 3
K ^ m
IA
V V,
\ / .
. \ { \ [
m
7 \ e
0
§ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
a
m G
-
(
; \ } ƒ
LA )
co
} } { \ ) \ T \
} � 3
3
2
/
I
7
z
5
,
y d v H nd d ^ s n
R 0 11
3 p
Z
m �
� o
a a -
In
oO
f1
o Y Q 1
N OO
uu u
A
co
^ p a
II3
O
o �
O p7
N
0 o e D O
O m
Z
ID 1
� p O
n
0
`p Z
e �
L O 3
_ n m 3
z
LA
-
.
§ p \
} � \
° : m , lyEElem �
LA G
K2
7D / 2}j ƒ
� \ j
e `
/ z
#
§ /
, a
a
S R O C S O n
-e-
p n 4 6
a S o e > D
LA
n n A
0 o c o o LA
=+ N cN oN off n n Lf T 1
'�
rY r3 u N O FN CCN 0 '^^� O u Y 'p W
u 6 K L � L O
r2 a z i
m
O ^ 1
a L N
6 W
4Y,
lI
O A w
o -o
0
U m
m 0
> o
A <
'D O N
O y
Z
1
'D p O
LA L
W 1 �
0
�p Z
�D
o �
za z z x n n z n
o
FS
z
a �
! \ ! \ \
-
! { \ } 3
; Fl
§ / \
e
_ a
3 ; o
3 \ �
m e /
\ j
~ % }
ƒ \ ƒ
e
\ \
\
\
m
z
LA
� M /
\ \
\
} } _
2
\ ; /
3 /
3 )
� w /
i )
\ \ \ 2 )
® 2 }
a /
� / )
\
{
i § 4
In
z
a
LA
o A
" O
M
w d
U
b
Z
M n
0
ul
o p C (p
Z co
a n O
Z
co
O o
U :w
O y
U -
- m
m 0
p O
A <
_ O
3
D (D
O y
_ N
� O �
L4 w
0
� z
n
0
3
3
m
z
LA
1
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Douglas K. Wise, City Planner
RE: Amendments to City Code for Animal Hospitals and
Veterinary Clinics in the B-2 District
DATE: August 10, 1989
INTRODUCTION•
At their meeting on August 3, 1989, the Planning Commission
passed a motion recommending to the City Council that Section
11.30, Subd. 3 be amended to allow as a conditional use "Animal
hospitals and veterinary clinics serving companion animals and
domesticated pets; provided, however, that all animal confinement
area shall be fully enclosed within a building". At their
meeting on July 18, 1989, the City Council received a
recommendation from the Planning Commission to amend City Code
Section 11.03 to allow exemption of lots from width and area
requirements when party walls are utilized. At that meeting the
City Council passed a motion directing the City Attorney to draft
the appropriate ordinance including these changes. Staff has
asked the City Attorney to draft an ordinance incorporating both
of these recommended changes.
BACKGROUND:
At their meeting on June 8, 1989, the Planning Commission opened
the public hearing on a proposed zoning code amendment to allow
animal hospitals and veterinary clinics in the B-2 zoning
district as a conditional use. The hearing was continued until
the July 6, 1989 meeting. At the July 6, 1989 meeting, the
Planning Commission closed the public hearing and tabled action
on the amendment until their meeting on August 3, 1989 and
directed staff to further refine the language contained in the
proposed code amendment. At their meeting on August 3, 1989 the
Planning Commission passed a motion recommending to the City
Council that City Code Section 11.30 Community Business (B-2) be
amended to allow as a conditional use "Animal Hospitals and
Veterinary Clinics serving companion animals and domesticated
pets; provided, however, that all animal confinement areas shall
be fully enclosed within a building". Currently, animal
hospitals and veterinary clinics are allowed in the AG, R-1, B-1,
B-3, I-1 and I-2 zoning districts by conditional use permit, but
are not allowed in the B-2 district.
The City Council at their meeting on July 18, 1989, received the
recommendation of the Planning Commission to amend City Code
Section 11.03 to exclude lots from width and area requirements
when party walls are utilized and approval has been granted for a
PUD (agenda item #lob) . The Planning Commission also recommended
that a definition be included in the City Code for "twin homes" .
At the July 18, 1989 meeting, the City Council passed a motion
directing the City Attorney to prepare the appropriate ordinance
making these Zoning Code amendments.
The City staff has contacted the City Attorney and requested that
he incorporate the recommendation of the Planning Commission
regarding the inclusion of animal hospitals in the B-2 zone into
the ordinance he is drafting. The City Attorney has indicated
that he would make every attempt to have the ordinance ready for
the August 15, 1989 City Council meeting and would include the
latest recommendation of the Planning Commission in the
ordinance. If the ordinance is ready, and the City Council
concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the
City Council can approve the ordinance at this time.
ALTERNATIVES•
1. The City Council can offer and pass Ordinance No. as
drafted, thereby approving the code changes as recommended
by the Planning Commission.
2. The City Council can offer and pass Ordinance No. after
changing the proposed wording of the City Zoning Code
amendments recommended by the Planning Commission.
ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Offer and pass Ordinance No. amending City Code Sections
11.02, 11.03, and 11.30 as proposed in alternative ql.
OR
2. Offer and pass a motion directing the City Attorney to
prepare the appropriate ordinance amending City Code Section
11.30 to allow animal hospital and veterinary clinics in the
B-2 Zoning District as a conditional use permit.
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Dave Hutton, City Engine4r�� wei
SUBJECT; McKenna Road
DATE: August 11 , 1989
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is a proposed agreement between the Cities of Shakopee
and Prior Lake and the Mdewakanton Sioux Indian Community
regarding improvements to McKenna Road.
BACKGROUND:
The Mdewakanton Sioux Indian Community has contacted both the
City of Prior Lake and the City of Shakopee regarding proposed
improvements to McKenna Road . The Community is proposing to pave
McKenna Road from County Road 42 north to the Shakopee City
Limits, which is also the northern boundary of the reservation.
The Community is proposing to pave this road at no expense to
either City.
A small portion of this section of road is within the City of
Shakopee Corporate Limits.
The road would be constructed and inspected according to City of
Shakopee and City of Prior Lake standards. The Community would
hire the contractor directly and pay for all construction.
Attached is a draft agreement prepared for all three parties
regarding this project. The City Attorney has reviewed this
document and finds it to be acceptable.
The last point staff would like to bring out is that if the
Community paves McKenna Road from County Road 42 to their north
boundary line, the City of Shakopee may want to consider paving
McKenna Road the rest of the way from their boundary north to
County Road 16 . This is approximately one mile in length. When
Council discusses the Capital Improvement Projects for 1990 this
project may want to be discussed at that time.
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Approve of the agreement which allows the Sioux Community to
pave a portion of McKenna Road within Shakopee City Limits
and authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the
agreement.
2. Reject the agreement.
3 . Direct staff to modify the agreement or revise the project
scope.
� LV
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 .
ACTION REQUESTED:
Move to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute an
agreement between the City of Prior Lake, the Mdewakanton Sioux
Indian Community and the City of Shakopee regarding the paving of
McKenna Road, a portion of which is located within the Shakopee
City Limits.
DH/pmp
MCKENNA
'w6)a ------------
anvil
-c+r• _ lJ - MN '810 _.
a.m nu u.. •a.0 sn.a. 1s L
ex _
a.w
w Ge
MN '810 Atl083N10
AN l81
II ' oaf,
'll!`1 3Y wo*eq�
W- W11 3o +san +ro 9:^�
y+,M z�aPl..eyc an+,d 1\
�W.11 J'o weHe9 -V �1 N
U �
�a1nVJ 1`Na�
STREET IMPRQVEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the day of
1989, by and among the City of Prior�e, a
mun cipa corporation by
under the laws of the State of
Minnesota ("Prior Lake") , the City of Shakopee, a municipal
corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota
("Shakopee") , the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Indian Community, a
federally recognized tribal government which is organized under the
provisions of the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 ("Community") and
McNamara Contracting Company, Inc. , a corporation
("Contractor") .
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Community desires to contract to have a portion of
McKenna Road, located In Shakopee and Prior Lake, surfaced with
bituminous asphalt; and
WHEREAS, Community shall contract with Contractor to provide all
of the materials, equipment and labor necessary for the complete
construction of the asphalt paving improvements on a certain portion
of McKenna Road as hereinafter described in this Agreement ("Work") ;
and
WHEREAS, Shakopee and Prior Lake believe it is in their best
interests to grant access to Community and Contractor to that portion
of McKenna Road to accomplish the Work for the benefit of Community
and the citizens of Shakopee and Prior Lake and the public;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and of the
mutual promises and conditions hereinafter contained, it is hereby
agreed as follows;
1 . Shakopee and Prior Lake hereby grant Community and
Contractor access to that portion of McKenna Road described on
Exhibit "A" , attached hereto and incorporated herein, for the purpose
of completing the Work contemplated by the contract documents between
Contractor and Community, a copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit "B" and incorporated by reference and approved by the parties
to this Agreement. The contract documents, including the plans and
specifications, performance and payment bonds, shall have been
reviewed by the engineering staff of Shakopee and Prior Lake and
approved by them prior to the execution of this Agreement.
2 . Community and Contractor agree that the Work contemplated by
the contract documents shall be entirely completed on or before
_, 19_
3 . The Shakopee and Prior Lake engineering staff shall inspect
and supervise the Work contemplated by the contract documents to
ensure that the Work is being completed in accordance with the
contract documents, plans and specifications.
4. Contractor shall be responsible for placing appropriate
traffic control signs and other warning signs, as necessary, during
the construction of the Work and/or obligations of the contract
documents.
08/01/89 14'36 661E 339 8064 LOMMEN NELSON 10003
5. Prior to the execution of this Agreement, Contractor and/or
Community shall furnish to Shakopee and Prior Lake for review by the
staff engineer. and/or city attorney all performance bonds and
insurance certificates, and evidence of insurance in final form, as
required by the contract documents.
6. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 181. 59 which
relate to civil rights and discrimination and affirmative action
shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though wholly set
forth herein, and Contractor and Community agree to comply therewith.
7 . Contractor and Community represent and agree for themselves,
their successors and assigns that Contractor and Community have not
made or created and that they will not make or create or suffer to be
made or created any total or partial sale, assignment, conveyance or
any trust or power to transfer in any other mode or farm of or with
respect to this Agreement or any part thereof or interest therein or
in Contractor or Community without the prior written approval of
Shakopee and Prior Lake.
E . The terms and provisions hereof :hall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and
assigns of the parties hereto.
9. Whenever in this Agreement it shall be required or permitted
that notice or demand be given or served by any party to this
Agreement to or on any other party, such notice shall be delivered
personally or mailed byy United States mail to the addresses
hereinafter set forth by certified mail (return receipt requested) .
Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered
personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the
above. The address of the parties hereto are as follows, until
changed by notice given as above:
If to Prior Lake:
462 a o a res
P.O. Box 359
Prior Lake, MN 55372
With a copy to: Glenn R. Kessel , Esq.
Lommen, Nelson, Cole b Stageberg, P.A.
1100 TCF Tower
Minneapolis, MN 55402
If to Shakopee:
With a copy to:
If to Community:
-2-
08/01/89 1436 U612 339 8064 LOMMEN NELSON ®004
With a copy to:
IP to Contractor: McNamara Contracting Company, Inc.
With a copy to:
10. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the rights
and remedies of the parties to this Agreement, whetherprovided by
law or by this Agreement shall be cumulative, and the exercise by any
party of any one or more of such remedies shall not preclude the
exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other such
remedies for the same default or breach or of any of its remedies for
any other default or breach by any other party. No waiver made by any
such party with res act to the performance, or manner of time
thereof, or any obligation under this Agreement shall be considered a
waiver of any rights of the party making the waiver with respect to
the particular obligation of any other party or condition to its own
obligation beyond those expressly waived in writing and to the extent
thereof, or a waiver in any respect in regard to any other rights of
the party making the waiver of any other obligation of any other
party. Delay by a party hereto in instituting or prosecuting any
cause of action or claim hereunder shall not be deemed a waiver of
any rights hereunder.
11. This Agreement may be amended by the parties hereto only by
written instrument executed in accordance with the same procedures
and formality followed for the execution of this Agreement.
12 . This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several
counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which
shall constitute one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be
duly executed on the day and year first above written.
Approved by the City Council on the , day of _ , 19_
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
By
s ayor By
T a a y meager
--- ------------------------------------------------------------ --------- -- -- -- ------------ ----------
08i01i89 14:37 e612 339 8064 LOMMEN NELSON 0 005
Approved by the City Council on the : day of 19_
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
i By
a Mayor
By
s City Manager
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
By
a rman
MCNAMARA CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC.
By
Approved as to form Approved as to form
for the City of Prior Lake for the City of Shakopee
I herewith approve this Agreement on behalf of the United States
Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me under the provisions of 25 U.S.C. Sec. 81
(1982) .
Dated: _ By;
res rec or
Minneapolis Area Office
! Bureau of Indian Affairs
-4- 1
i
16
JULIUS A.COLLER, II
JULIUS A_COU-ER ATTOHHEY AT LAW eiz-ms izaa
�11 WEST FIRST AVENUE
lase-ieao SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA
663x9
Memo to: Dave Hutton, city Engineer
From: Julius A. Colley, II, City Attorney
Date: August 9, 1989
Re: McKenna Road Improvement
I have gone over this proposed agreement to the Mdewakanto Sioux
Indian Community paving a portion of McKenna Road, part of which is
in Shakopee.
The agreement is fine except the execution portion. It should be signed
by the City of Shakopee by its Mayor, its City Manager and its Clerk,
and page 2 should be amended accordingly.
If there are any questions call me.
I am returning the proposed agreement herewith.
lob
MEMO T0: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Dave Hutton, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Killarney Hills Street Improvements
DATE: August 7, 1989
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is a contract extension agreement from Orr-Schelen-
Mayeron and Assoc . , Inc . for performing design services
associated with the above referenced project.
BACKGROUND:
On July 18 , 1989 the City Council ordered the preparation of
plans and specifications for street and storm improvements to all
streets within the Killarney Hills Addition, namely Tyrone Drive
and Sharon Parkway. Due to current staff workloads and the
complexity of this project , staff is requesting that our
consultant, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Assoc . , Inc . be utilized to
design this project.
Attached is a contract extension agreement with OSM in the amount
of $18,000 to complete this work. This "not-to-exceed" amount of
$18 ,000 includes preparing a design using both the urban street
criteria and the rural street criteria. Staff had requested that
a design of both alternatives be done so that the cost estimates
for each alternative can be refined prior to deciding which
alternative to build . The consultant has indicated that
completing two designs for this project will result in
approximately $3 ,000 in additional costs, which is included in
the estimated cost of $18 ,000 .
Staff is still recommending that an urban street design with curb
& gutter be utilized for this project in order to better control
drainage, but during the public hearing on the project there was
concern by several residents that the curb & gutter portion of
the project be delayed until the sewer and water were ever
extended out to that area. If Council wishes to eliminate the
rural design alternative, this contract extension amount can be
reduced by $3 ,000 .
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Approve of the agreement as listed in the attached Scope of
Services for a "not-to-exceed" amount of $18 ,000 , which
includes an urban design and a rural design.
2. Approve of the agreement modified to include only the urban
street design of $15 ,000 for a "not-to-exceed" figure from
OSM.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 2 , to approve the agreement but
only for the urban street design portion. The feasibility report
recommended an urban street design and staff also made that
recommendation at the public hearing. The concern of the
residents was that if sewer and water were put in at a later
date, the street with curb & gutter would need to be removed in
order to install the utilities. Staff contended at the public
hearing that the utilities could be installed behind the curb &
gutter in the median, rather than down the center of the street
to alleviate this potential. Rather than spend an additional
$3 ,000 to design the rural street, staff feels that the urban
street design would be acceptable.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Move to direct the appropriate City officials to execute a
revised contract extension agreement with Orr-Schelen-Mayeron &
Assoc. , Inc. of Mpls. , MN to perform design services associated
with Killarney Hills Project for a "not-to-exceed" figure of
$15,000 , per the revised Scope of Services which consists of an
urban street design only.
DH/pmp
DESIGN
W.I.Orr
«
�-ern •. '1Rs. assoasees,xw.
Ida 1 Lunn,,nn M„uv
July 26, 1989 m:111-11-11, hill 6lit
A
et .v
I \ '� I
I nrn r.r.
wrnvm
City of Shakopee
129 East 1st Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Attn: Mr. David Hutton, P.E.
City Engineer
Re: Contract Extension Agreement
Killarney Hills Addition
Street Improvements
Dear Mr. Hutton:
As per our Agreement for Professional Services with the City of Shakopee,
Section 1-A - 3-B (Major Projects), this extension agreement is for the
design of street improvements within the above addition. The project
will include streets and storm sewer.
Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc. agrees to accomplish the attached
Scope of Services for a fee not to exceed $18,000.
The City of Shakopee agrees to reimburse OSM for these services in
accordance with Section IV of the Agreement for Professional Services.
If this proposal meets with your approval , please sign below and return
one copy to our office. We look forward to working with you on this
project.
Yours very truly,
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON CITY OF SHAKOPEE
rSOCIATES C.
d"' 'I Dolores M. Lebens , Mayor
Robert D. Frigaard, P.E.
As�s�oolciat f/J�
t/�a' Dennis R. Kraft , City Admin.
ernre A. Mittelsteadt
President
RDF/cmw Judith S. Cox , City Clerk
07/89-67
Attachment
ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR
KILLARNEY HILLS ADDITION
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
FOR THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. DESIGN PHASE
1. Review and evaluation of the preliminary report prepared by the
City.
2. Necessary surveying work to prepare final constructions plans
(easement work will be extra).
3. Set up soil testing program and evaluate borings (testing to be
paid for by the City) .
4. Project design on two alternates, rural section and urban
section.
S. Preparation of design plans, specifications and bidding
documents.
6. Preparation of detailed construction cost estimate for both
alternates.
7. Prepare and submit necessary permit applications to regulatory
agencies.
8. Assist the City in advertising for bids and provide
recommendations for award of contract.
B CONSTRUCTION PHASE
1 . Provide required construction engineering services as follows:
a. Periodic observations of the work in progress (once a week -
4 hours) .
b. Preparation of supplementary drawings to clarify working
drawings.
c. Review of shop drawings to determine compliance with plans
and specifications.
d. Review of necessary testing done by testing laboratories.
e. Final inspection and report of completed project.
f. Completion of as-built plans for City records.
� ac
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Dave Hutton, City Engineep &-J1
SUBJECT: Parking Lot by Scout Building
DATE: August 8 , 1989
INTRODUCTION:
Councilman Scott has requested that staff place an item on the
Council agenda regarding paving an extension of the Lion' s Park
parking lot adjacent to the new scout building.
BACKGROUND:
The construction of the new scout building created a situation
whereby the parking lot at Lion' s Park should be expanded.
The driveway for the scout building is curved with two accesses
off the parking lot. (See Attachment 91 site sketch) . Between
the two driveways is an area consisting of dirt and vegetation,
just adjacent to the existing paved driveway. Vehicles are
utilizing this area for parking and the potential is there for
vehicles to encroach on the newly laid sod.
Councilman Scott has asked staff to prepare an estimated cost for
paving this area and to put this item on the next Council agenda.
Staff has done a detailed cost estimate, which is included as
Attachment No. 2. The total estimated cost is $2 ,500 .00 which
includes bituminous pavement, gravel base and curb and gutters.
The Community Recreation Director is in favor of this project.
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Direct the appropriate City staff to arrange for paving this
portion of the parking lot at a "not-to-exceed" amount of
$2 ,500 .00.
2 . Deny the request.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 .
ACTION REQUESTED:
Move to authorize the appropriate City staff to arrange for
extending the parking lot in Lion ' s Park adjacent to the new
scout building by adding pavement and curb and gutter at a "not-
to-exceed" amount of $2 ,500 .00 , to be paid for out of the City' s
Contingency Fund.
. �e � -# / � l6 c�
E.r'iSrii✓�
�A�Ki.J,� � V
LoT D
Q
I
f
"' four .(sr �,r�+,ri '
a p
o /JN/t D/n/�j
a
a p
y
� � j
�2��ir4�/ -�
i
I
k
4
h
Cf7UNTy �A9 JS
ATTACHMENT i2 �!J
COST ESTIMATE
Asphalt - 2" thick
For 20 Ft. x 120 Ft. area, tonnage = 30 tons
Cost = 30 tons @ $25 per ton = $750 .00
Gravel Base - 4" thick
For 20 Ft. x 120 Ft. area, tonnage = 58 tons
Cost = 58 tons @ $7 per ton $400 .00
Curb & Gutter
120 L.F. @ $7.00 per foot $850 .00
Miscellaneous (grading, riprap for spillway , etc. ) = $500 .00
TOTAL COST = $2,500.00
10d
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Dave Hutton, City Enginee, .
SUBJECT: Downtown Bench /`�/1W�
DATE: August 7, 1989
INFORMATIONAL ITEM FOR COUNCIL:
On August 1 , 1989 Councilman Wampach requested that staff install
a bench near Beren' s Supermarket due to the number of senior
citizens that get picked up there by dial-a-ride.
Staff would like to inform Council that at this point there are
no additional benches that can be installed in the downtown area.
The City would have to purchase an additional bench or possibly
relocate one of the existing benches downtown . Staff has
relocated numerous benches the last several weeks due to citizen
and/or Council ' s request. Staff does not feel that it is in the
best interest of the City to continue to relocate benches in the
downtown area , but rather if additional benches are needed in
certain locations the City should purchase them and install them.
If Council desires to do this , staff should be directed to
contact the street department and order an additional bench to be
installed at the Beren' s corner.
DH/pmp
BENCHES
IDS
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Dave Hutton, City Engine
SUBJECT: Alley Behind City Hall
DATE: August 9 , 1989
INTRODUCTION:
This memo is a follow up to the August 1 , 1989 City Council
discussion regarding the closing of the alley behind City Hall .
BACKGROUND:
On July 18 , 1989 the City Council directed staff to investigate
the possibility of closing the alley behind City Hall to through
traffic as a safety improvement.
On August 1 , 1989 the City Council discussed this concept. At
that meeting , there were two businesses owners who appeared
before the City council and indicated that closing the alley
would have a severe impact on their ability to conduct business.
The consensus of the City Council was that the alley should not
be closed for the following reasons:
1 . It would severely impact businesses in this block.
2. Traffic congestion has existed in the downtown area for many
years and is a problem in other alleys as well as 1st
Avenue . Closing one alley will not improve the overall
traffic situation downtown substantially.
3. The construction of the minibypass is still on schedule for
November, 1990 bid letting and the general feeling of the
Council was to postpone any "temporary improvements" until
the minibypass is constructed.
Staff was directed to develop alternatives to improving the
overall safety in the alley behind City Hall.
The Acting Chief of Police, the City Administrator and the City
Engineer have discussed this situation. Staff suggests that the
following improvements can be made to the alley to increase
pedestrian safety and reduce the overall traffic speed at minimal
expense and disruption to businesses:
1 . Paint a crosswalk on the alley from the municipal parking
lot to the rear entrance of City Hall to highlight this
pedestrian movement . In addition , a sign should be
installed at the crosswalk indicating pedestrian crossing or
stating "STOP FOR PEDESTRIANS".
2 . Enlarge the speed bumps.
3 . Install a stop sign at the exit from the alley immediately
east of the subject alley. Currently vehicles are going
from one alley to the other without stopping at Lewis
Street.
4. Have the Police Department periodically patrol this area to
enforce the 10 m.p.h. speed limit.
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Adopt the above strategies.
2. Direct staff to make additional improvements.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 .
ACTION REQUESTED:
Move to direct the appropriate City staff to install the
additional signing, crosswalks and speed bumps as discussed in
this memo in order to improve the overall safety of the alley
behind City Hall and to direct the Shakopee Police to
periodically patrol this area for vehicles violating the speed
limit.
DH/pmp
ALLEY
MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
_
RE: Application for Temporary3.2 Beer License by St.
Mary's Catholic Church
DATE: August 10, 1989
INTRODUCTION•
St. Mary's Catholic Church has made application for a
temporary 3.2 beer license for August 27, 1989.
BACKGROUND:
The City Attorney has reviewed the surety bond and insurance
exemption and they are in order.
ALTERNATIVE•
1. Approve application.
2. Deny application.
RECOMMENDATION•
Alternative No. 1, Approve application.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve the application and grant a temporary on-Sale 3 .2
beer license to St.Mary's Catholic Church, 535 Lewis Street, for
August 27, 1989.
CONSENT
MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Adm istrator
FROM: Judith S. Co., City Clerk
RE: Application for Liquor Lic ses by Corp-Tool, Inc.
DATE: August 9, 1989
INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND:
On July 18, 1989, Council tabled the application of Corp-
Tool, Inc. (Arnie's) for On-Sale, Off-Sale, and Sunday Liquor
Licenses. The applicants have not completed the remodeling on
the building, nor have they obtained the appropriate insurance
and surety bond, at this time. In order to keep this item from
dying on the table, it is necessary for Council to remove the
application from the table, and if they are not in order, to
place them back on the table.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Remove from the table the application for an On-Sale, Off-
Sale, and Sunday Liquor License for Corp-Tool, Inc.
2. Table the application for an On-Sale, Off-Sale, and Sunday
Liquor Licenses for Corp-Tool, Inc.
JSC/tiv
CONSENT )o.�
MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. COX, City Clerk
RE: Diamond Court Street Const ction
DATE: August 9, 1989
INTRODUCTION:
Dale Dahlke, Developer of Hauer's 4th Addition, has asked
that he be allowed to construct the street improvements for
Diamond Court vs the City constructing the street and assessing
it to abutting property owners.
BACKGROUND:
Under the Developer's Agreement for Hauer's 4th Addition,
the Developer selected Plan B for construction of the public
improvements to some of the streets (City construct and assess) .
The Developer's Agreement does provide that the Developer may
request that the improvements be changed from a Plan B (City
construct) to Plan A (Developer construct) . The Developer has
requested that the City now allow him to construct the public
improvements for Diamond Court. This is the last street in this
Development to be constructed. It is a small project and the
Developer would like to complete it himself.
The City Engineer has no objections to the Developer
constructing this street instead of the City, as long as it is
done according to approved plans.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve request and allow Developer to construct Diamond
Court.
2. Deny request and have the street constructed by the City and
assess costs to Abutting property owners.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative 1, Approved the request and allow Mr. Dahlke to
construct Diamond Court.
REQUESTED ACTION:
Approved the request of Dale Dahlke to construct public
improvements for Diamond Court according to plans approved by
the City Engineer.
JSC/tiv
August 9th, 1989
City Council
City of Shakopee
129 East 1st. Avenue
Shakopee.,Minnesota 55379
i
Council Members:
B E D Development, Inc. hereby requests that Diamond Court
in Hauer-s 4th Addition be changed from a Plan B. Improvement,
as previously set up, to a Plan A Improvement.
Work to complete this final street project will start as
soon as permitted by the city.
Si(n'c1erely,
Dale F. Dahlke
President: BED Development, Inc.
RECE ED
AUG o 41989
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
N N N NNNNNNNN N N NNN 000 N NNNNNNN Y
N N ��NFNNNF N NNN ....... O tl /O
m m o ON000000 0 0 0 0000000 m
UUUUUU � U NNN W WWNNNNN l'l m
• Y O x U • mmmmmmmm • W • x U x WWwWW JC O
2 y
O <
O
0 0 m .2000022 m 0 .20 m .20.000 D T
\ \ \ \\\\\\\\
n Om Om 0 \ \m\m\2 \0 \2\\2\ \
.0000.... . 20\0 m D2
m S
\ m \ 22 \\\m \ \ \\\ \ \\\\\\\ 0
m m m mw22 w mmmmm m m mm2 m wwwmmmm a
mmmmmww m
m
D
0
UU O
WW UU NONWp NN pUUW W UA W w y
00 ww00 pYwmmUrJr WW 00 JOJ NN WNUrWWWO
00
00 WW WW 00 NOWwYwVN OO �� JmWW V pWNJJwON
00 ..01-1020 00 WO PP AUUmJmmO
Mw
T o mmmmmmmm m m D r 000 ann n ➢aaaasD
a cccccccc N ccccccc
A < NNNNNNNN C T .9 AAm y-�l-iytiy
y C r�r+r-�w w�a T < 000 O 0000000
O O 3 ZZZZ222Z A O G
z z mmmmmmmm 2 333 0000000m
NNNNNNNN m N YYY 3 TmmTmmT 2
Z
N D Q NNNNNNNN C Z22 T ZZ2222 0
W
N C 0 zzzmm2 0 yyyyyyy 0 O 00000000 r O x W2'A 2m2W A
2 v CCCCcc.. y 2 NNN DDDDDDD O
m yyy-y y-lyy 000 0 rrrrrrr x
N O
O Z Z r- � � C
NNNNNNN O
OO 0 .11, 1
....... S
yyyy„yy 9 A 999999V
ATAAAAAA O rrrrrrr T
NNNNNNNN O 2 «««< 0
O h
,
N O NNNNNNNN 3 NNN m TWN A
C .9 n CCCCCCCC O O CCC QQQQQrC y
A T „ 99vv9aaa C N 99 O CCCCC09 T
�9999a99 m 99V m rwrwwO9 3
➢ ti rrrrrrr a rrr 9aVVa
m m mmmmmmmm 3 mm2 a 333332 m
'-0 NNNNNNNN D NNN DDDaDrN N
➢ G Q Z y 22222, A
9 y
a
z
O N . .0000000 0 0 000 0 000000. D
W 0
Q
p A A AAPApPPp p A AAP A APAAAAA O
rWm NNN yNj 4)WWWWr 2
O 00000000 000 O NNNNNOO y
P A wWpWWY�-Y P mmW WPPWWWA 2
N WN WpNWNNN O
O YpYr A A YWYYYW
p P P mPfJ 4)n rr A W mwW wPAWWWA
N Y N YUNNYNWN N r Yrr w NpNWNNN 2
G
W N N NNN
N U 000
W N R O
W mm2
W Y WWW 9
WWW O
O m
R m
3
T 9
N D
N N
a m
N N N N N N N r
' NNN NN N NN NNN N NN N N N N
NY Y 1-.YY N YY N N O b �
JVV pp N YY YFY Y Y O O O T m
mmm + JV • p + yN ppp t m • WW + O e 1 + F O A O
Z y
O K
O `
mmm 0O w mm mmm m Om m m 0 Om D T
Ono 0o m mom moo m mo Om o 0 o n
m mm mm m m m m a!
I o
bmm mm b mm mmm m mm m m m m 'm
m
D
3
mm c
WYY NN yYW YW ym NN Y y
000 pqJ 00 OWW Np WW YW JJ Wy ww
00
JVV YmW YY �Ab WpmW NN WO N0 yy YY 00
yym p pm VAmy qq JJO N 00 pA OO
YN+a TT O 00 Ono A 44 O O O O
nn D
yyy ti-i N
yyti 33 O CC m 2 N <
DDDZDZ y DD DDD .nv yy A £ fk Z
«< m AW ccc r as v o
mmm An vv o0o y c c y
$
nmomom OW vI on
zD
o
000 00 o x�c v
DDa W 33 myy rr v y S (mj
AAA pp O O ZN
�. Nyy YM O Z A
0 0 l
y
m
WWW9m 3 yy y y 91 y O T 9 N A
000 00 y OC CC9 O O ~ O p'Ti ~
mom m yy Y y 00 x H m
333 0. rr vvr r mr D m v y 3
Y mm m 0
M»a mm mmm m
«
ZZ « D A Z C A
ti
0
Z
000 NO O 00 000 O 00 O O O D
m n
NNN W W W NN NNN N W W N y N W C
WW YY m WWY $
000 00 00 NO O 00 O 1
YYY NY w NN pNY qq P pP A Z
A N b m
AW W WW AWW W P P P
Ymm YY Y NN NNY Y qq N Y A N 2
W
y �
0 0
Y o m q ae m
N N q m
O P
O
O m
s m
3
m 9
y D
D m
0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 m
JC Jf A S ]C T. S JC
y y y y W y y y N
N N N N N NNNNNNNNN N N N
N N N N N N NNNNNNNNN N O m
S
N N N N NNNNNNNNN
p W W N � 000000000 m J D m
• W • W • W • p • V • a ppAPAPApp • b t O b F �
z
O
O
0 0 0 0 o O 000000000 0 0 o a T
ti W
0 0 0 0 0 000000000 0 0 0 a
mmmmmmmmb m m F
9
m m m b m b mnummmnmm m m m m
a
3
0
c
z
V ~
AA mm NN AY
00 Pp mm WpVmmOmN WW WO
WW 00 OO 00 OWNJYmbbmm 00 00 OJ
Nm 00 00 OO 00 Wb WWmmmmmWAJ 00 00 Om
2 222 D T T
Z Z O m m DDDDDDDDD N O
ti O WZ 2 Y 999999999 0 2 9
r O z z z 333333333 O O W
mm m m 000_00_0_000 m -i <
O 2 __ _
3 2__ M 9 m
D 2 N WWWWbWmWW 2 W D Z
0 z m D < o
o xxxxxxxxx 0 m O
m n 000000000
? D O EEEEEEEFE O a 0
D o n mmmmmmmmm a r x
x r z m m
N W 2 D O
K -1 O O Z Z F
m 2 D m
ti
N 9 K Y
C 0 O N
W
ti
m
0 0 m mmmmmWmWm T m m 9
m c O 0 Q 0rrrrcccc r r -�
2 m 2 C C .00009999 O O O
H000099v9 T D O 3
N V 9
P R^ T3333r�wrrr W gg 3 m
W 3 3 3DDDDmmmm
N N D D D�-IYMYmbmb 9w W
c. n Yzzzz < z i 0
C m 2 Z Z Ztitititi
W
G
y 2
0 0 o O o O 000000000 0 0 0
n
A A p A P P PAAAAAAPA P p P O
W m W W WWWYYYY W W z
O O O N .00000000 O O O J
W W W p WWWWYmmWW A P 2
W N mNYNY N O
YONYYYYYY P
p W YWmWW p A
W Y W N N N NNNNmNYNY N m N 2
G
m p W
p W R O
O
N N
J m A O
O b
R m
3
m T
W D
N D
a
D
n n n n n n n n n
m
F s s F s s s F s
W W W W m m m W W W
NNN N N NNNN N NN
NNN N NN N NNNN N N NN N m
• VVV • U • U • JV • Y JJVV W N WW yl (J
W W 0000 • J • • W W e A Ji n
2 y
O <
wmo O m mm m mwmm o m o� o a m
omoo 0 0 00 - 0000 0 0 00 o a
om m m mm - mmmm m m mm m s
mmm m m mm m .... u m mm o m
D
;
N U WY 0
WWOO YY Y.Vm 2
OmPo aNl- PP UwWW y
mm00 JJ AWJ aP PO WW UU mmm pp
UUNtl VV 00 NWW YY NOOWY 00 pm NN
0.0. OO mW UU OOUO 00 1-Y AP mm
r a m mm z ssss s s on
oo QV
on 0 DD
p MN a DDDD m 3 c
3 WUUU 2 y W
UWW J 9 UWUU 2 y mm yDj <
WU m m
m x AAAA Z U 2
00 C9 O
z yT m 0011
0m
_OOO W WW m a n
OO y 2 .T:OA y 2
z D " mmmm o s n
noon a m
'A Alla 0 a
`
Duo ym
0000 �
U
y
m
.mm o T y'f m vvvv W yy
O AAAA
y
NNU y p T< 9 OTTO 9 9 DD 9 m m
yyy V GG ;
W rr „ UWNW „ mm m
a m �� m O
m
m AA D AAAA � W AA N W
G <G« a
1 UU 2 2
CC y y CC
WW WW 9
NH wN �
UW NU O
yy yy z
100 Y o 00 O .000 0 0 00 0 a
p
WWW N fail 4AtW N Ypi fpY Ol(aj N N Wfail N 0
N
C
000 O 00 N 0000 O 00 O 2
y
YWN W W NY N JI-WW W UW r
. YwY G
WYY Y W •.1.. � 1 f 1 1
UU P W NI- N YYWW W r UN Y 2
p O <
W
W p O
N J 9 m
0 m O
O m
a
; m
m 9
U D
W p
x x s s s z x x x
N N N N NNN N NNNN NN N N N
N N N N NNN N NNNN NN N N N O_
W W WWW W WWWW W W
�nW m w m WAW PW W .N..N.rr W W om o o n m
� . w . o • n . . oo . . x 9 '
z �
o <
0
0 0 0 o 000 a 0000 0o w o o a T
ti w
0 .0. 0 .... 0 m x
0 0 0 0 000 o W000 Oo 0 0 o s
m mmmm mm m m m x
9
m m m m mmm m mmmm mm m m m m
n
WW mm c
z
N AP .WYA. pp VJ -1
N pA WPWWP ww WW mm WW
Wn 00 NN mWW 00 00W.
AA JmONO YO pP 00 00
m WW WW mm rmmW WW mOOmW WWO pP 00 00
p z FY 3000 0 nnn oo ; o
aAz000 a aaaa « m c
H O W AA99 r;
x O D 3 113 w I <
2 N C C wwWw < m
£ DDDD 22 D C 2
Z D 9 r DDD W 2Z2Z as O Z O
< 0 0
s m yyy w VT 0 m o a
< T a wmm 3333O
00 Z O
0 0 TTTl 00 x
a m O 0.00 00 m m �
C W 0 N s
O o
Z a
w w r 0
a
w w 3 m mmm C 9999 Ww C N
C C O C OOC ti DDDD CC ti
T a ti a y N m M N m
A a w rr r 3
r r D 9Tr 2222 -�
m m T m mmm ~ 0000 ~ ~ C m
W w C DDw DDDD ww O m Z N
r 22 w 0.00
N W O A
-1 -Iti ZZZZ 2
titiyti
O -1
TTTT T 0
mmmm w 2
O O O O 000 p YGJY 00 O O n
0
P P A A PAA A PAPP AA P A A O
N N N N wwww m C
N WWr N 2
O O m NNO O 00 m O A -i
P W P A PPw r 0000 �� O 2
N N P N PNN p 0000 O O
N 0000 W N O
A W A A PAW 0000 W O
N N p N pNN P OOOO WI- V N O 2
G
W
00 m R O
W O
N m O
O m
0 m
3
m 9
N D
w O
a m
w
m
n n n n n n n n n
x x x x x s s x s
w N w w w w N w w w
N N NNNNN NNN N N N NNN N N
N NNNNN NNN N N N N O
A A PPPHH ppA p p p PPp x
F UUUUU W n b
O • • mmmmm • 000 • W • F O • NNN • F Y m JC O
2 4
O <
O
m w mmmmm mmm w m m mmm m 0 D T
0 m on.m\mo 000 0m 0 0 00. m i
m m mmm m m mmm s
9
m m mmmmm mmm m m m mmm m m
D
WW G_
y W W DAWN N -I
NWmWNJ NYO NN UU N
AFmWAW OFOm mm 00 VV WNWV 00 Cl.
bW pH WWOOWH OWFO 0000 WOUJ 00 HA m
HA HH OUOOyO NUVO WW 00 00 NOVU 00 00 U
3 A A'A AAA 999 9 9 9 000 Z Z
D m TTTTT DDD A 9 m m D
< 00000
S.9 SASA O Yz
OmmmmmWWW 333 T
<
I Duo O O
O m O 2
y 00000 O 3 O
I DDD O O
T £ TTTTm r W.0 C
3 O W..
O 000 O
O 00000 m O
OS
000 N
tititi-iti -iyy L> y < 0
O ___ W ZZZ 0 Z
00000 000 O 0 A
F
non m
l W
ti
A
ti WTmTWm a9m9 y 3 99
c 000, c 0 c O -y
➢ CCCOO •a6 W W 000 9 C T
G 9 ti00 22T T T O 999 9 3
999 by D 9
r 33m W O - WWN O 333➢D NPm m mmm m m
P y DDD
zz AAA y y
22 99G 3 G« A
2Z2titi CC D Z
titi-i 0m ti H
W
W ti
y O
y Z
O O 00000 000 O O O _ NNN _ O D
WU�W
O
A A PpHHp AAA A A A AAP P A O
N NNNNN WWW WWW N N C
WUUF W 2
O O N0000 000 y 000 O N ti
U m F
N p FO
P mmm4lF PWm pHP J
A NNFFm NFF N Y Y FFF W F � U
y P
O m O
O
F O
O
3 m
in n
W
a
W
0 o o n n n n m n
As s s H N s s
0 W W y y W W
NNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNN NNNNN NN N NN N
NNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNN NNNNN NN NN N n m
NNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNN UUUUU UU UU p pp a m m
00000000 00000 00 00 m mm n
YJJYJJJJJ • mmmmmmWm mmmmm VV • NN a m YJ • r • pC O
Z ti
O <
O
O T
m.m...... .......w wmmmm no on m no w D
ti y
Qo.a.a.0 0.0000\\ 0.00. n0 0\ 0 00 m x
00000000. ......0000 00000 �� 00 0 00 o a
mmmmmmmmm mmmmm mmmmm mm m mm m s
mmm miommmm omm�mmuu mmmmm mm mm m mm m
m
s
;
0
_ _ c
z
U mP Pw NW W W mW NN ti
OrUUmUUVm NUmwwwrWw UOm AWr yU AA
WONmUPO JrmWWWNWw pmUmrW VOm WW 00
.OIW..OUO 000000000 WWaar 000 WWJ 00 .00 00
mOJmNNOUO 000000000 POUNUN AOA mWU WW 000 00
yyyy NNNNN NNNNNNNN N.... Uy yw 0 0. .9
xxx ssxxx 00000 xx xx n on <
ccccc'c'c cc aaaanann ccccc nn nn 0 0o m
000000000 ST.SAS.S -i-iti ti-1 S..Z ST. . I. a
00000000 ££££E 009 00 H -�• 7c m
mm
mmmmmmm 0 no 0 z
mmmmmmmm ..... mm mm Y -1-i O
ti tiy-iti < <t IF p9
N NNNyyNN -1-1 TT
mmm NNNNN 00 0 ti O
mmmmm CCCCC AA iA O NN 2
«« WWWWW mm oo xx y m
00,00000 ccccc
mmmm"llmmmwa n <
NNNNNNNN DDDDD DD y TT :O
22222 CC
titi O
OO N
H
m
cccccc9mm ccccaccc 99999 I mm 0 n
ytiytiyy900 JJ-i-i-i-�ti-i zaavv no 00 00 H11
ti
w0�� wwwwwwww ww_0 cc CC O CC m
99 NNNNNNNN ytiti 03 99 99 A 3
-Iti Hti""�XxN -1-Itititi-1titi -1 g N O
mW.Www<aD mmmmmmmw R+M^ mz DD D
NNNNyNGww NNNNNNNN 99992 G 9 n
22 CCCCN 22 ZZ 22 A A
yti WWWW tiM -1-i tiH G 9
H
O
2
000000000 00000000 ..... 00 00 O 00 N n
n
LaIW WWWWWNN WwwwwwWP PPPaP NN PP 4P1 NN U O
W WWWWW NN C
VJJJJJJJ NNNNw WW WW r r 2
OOOOOOONN 00000000 OOOOm NN NN O m ti
NNNrrwrNU WWAWWrrr UUprr FF Pw r WW N 2
NrNNrmmm WWNWJ AN U Nw N O
rNY-rNr rANr P '
rrr rrwr VWmrm rr ww rr Y
AWWWrrAWW WWaWWrrr PPArr PW AW WW P
NrNrmmrNr NrNNrmmm rrNwJ rr PN N Nr r Z
G
a
R O
J
N O
O m
R m
3
m 9
N D
N L)
n m
0
n 0 0 0 m
s s s s s
N
0 N N N V
NNNNN N N N N N NNNNN N NNNNNNNN
UmUWW J mW N N N N NNNNN U UyUU1N Ntir m m
YYrYY • J • • W a p W N • OOOOO • m JVVVJVVV JnC O
Z -1
O S
O
mmmWW W m m m m m Wmmmm WO .00.WWWm0m. D T
00000 om o o mo 0 0m 00000 m 00000000 D
mmmmm m m m mmmmm mmmmmmmm x
mmmmm o m m m m m ron miom m mmmmmmmlmn m
m
a
c
r z
N N NWr NN NN mW WW mW YUW VJ OUWb WUVm ~
N mm NN pp UU WW OUmWpYYr
N 00 NN 00 NN 00 UNO WW VOOONOmWW
UOOWU 00 NN pp 00 00 OOOOOO UU OOWUpmUA
CCCCC C y 0 y y y Nyyyy y yyyyNWyy
J O 1 ti 2 -1HHH-1 ti 99999999
NNNNN y A Z m D DDDDa CCCCGCCC
£EE£E N 3 x AAAAA TW nOnnnnOO
mmmmm a o xssss
NNNNN O 'A 9 m A fail Nyyyy D m
-�H ti-Iti y w m 110000, N O
00000 x
W N p
230000D m y y D 2 Tm y
Z3 3 w m 3 wx W
m W z zzzzz m
z o 00n0W n
E A W
o m
y
ti
m
A
titi-I-IH A Z y y 9 W WWW W9 LECCCCCC I-I
rrrrr N
00ow0
- A DDtiti ti-iti1 H
O 000 O ti-I N Ir I-Iwww m
99999 D m 9 T OOWWZ mAww wlyNl-I ;
„ D
w
00000 m (+ m m m 3333 y W wwwwJti 0
ranHH m mol----- m
22ZZZ m A .Ommm mmm y
mmmmm 9 'S < ZZZ22 zyyyyyy
mO
z A
m am
y0
ti ti
m
O
z
00000 O o 0 0 o W 00000 o W0o0000 a
WWWWp p W p N A fpJ
NLL"
y 41�AAAAAA O
N W b Y WWWWWm C
N U WWWUW JVJ
O O O O 00000 x000000 -1
W r WWrrr F OOWWmmWp 2
UWNY Y N WNmWW OONNNNrN O
p OYANY OOmWNYYJ
Y N NNmmm OOWWWmWA
VUWNY Y V Y Y r OONNNNYN 2
G
R O
9 m
O
O m
R b
3
m 9
y D
s m
O
n n n n n n
m
s x s x x s
y N y y m y m
N N NNN NN N N N NNNNNNNNN
N N NNNNNNN NN N N NNNNNNNNN O_ m
W W WWWWWWm WW W W WU m
U U WW O m O
U • O • VVVVVVJ + 00 • O • J + W + O • YYrYrrrYr J! O
2 y
O K
O
O T
w e'e mmmmeWemm mm � w 0 0 000000000 a
ti y
O O 0000000 00 O O O O 000000000 D
m m mmbmbmb mm m m m m mmmmmmmmm s
m io mIG lGbbmb mn m m m m mmmmmmmom m
m
a
;
O
UP C
2
WmJ mm WW YWY ti
AA p NNrmN NN bm Or WOWY
00 rAmmNmmW 00 UYAmVmN
N 00 WNNUyNY YO 00 mm00 WmmJprUWrA
W 00 rNyyVUUN 000 00 bb 00 00 VUUVOONUYW
N N SCSCSCC EE m E G < CCCCCCCCC
DDDDDD➢ nD D D r
AAAA yy y L) 2 J! NNNNNNNNN
Ll W CCCCCCC tiH -1 A
D NNNNNNN mm 2 ££F£F£FFF G
A NNNNNNN N Om
0000000 O N 2
NNNNN
O
Z2 2 D O
2 ....... DD O N W 00000000000000
O ££{vvv,££££ mm S m N 3333333;; A 2
;; G
0000000 z z o
0000000 22 0 0 ac
n m
m
y
O mNNONNN CC 9 C N ti3'-ItiJ-1y Hti A
O D OCCrCCC „„ A M N C ......... .
C M CTT0999 9 mNl'rrrrrr m
Y99N999 !'!' Z 2 r 9 Ommmmmmm ;
m
;mmDmmm P P m O 0.00000
aNN=NNN NN y y m mmmmmmm n
z Q Z ti c c
9
9 �
O
2
0 0 000000000 0 0 .o- r0000000o n
P NYrYrrrrr 0
N A NNNNNNN 4p11A. A Aj N �AAPAP F ww. O W ANWmWC
W Wy VJ J r NmNNNNNNN 2
N000000 00 O O O O YmrYrrrrY y
p N rNNWNNr NN r P m rNYNWNYm O
W W
p N WNrOYWWA VJ r � W rYAPWWWWr
N r NNY NN Y A mWNrrWNrm �
N
p R O
W
A 9
O m
R m
3
m 9
N a
� m
n n n n n n is 0 m
N N N y N
0 N N m
N NN N N N N N N N N NNNNNN N N N
N NN N N N N N N N N NNNN N N N O
m wm m m m O 0 N O NN 00000 O O y O m
P WW N Y O J P NNNNN O i N S O
2 I
O �
OOm Om O Om W . O w m m m m mmmmgw-
000 mm yW yy m m m D T
0 00 pm o ow o 0 0 � � O 'm 000000p ® - om a
n mm m m m m nnmmnmm m
m mm m m m m m m m m m n mmmm mmm ® m m m
m
D
3
0
Y
c r ww 2
YY PA yN, m� 00 00 NF 00 WmYNrNNY Wn VV yJ y
000 OO JJ Wn yy
O 000 wm 00 dY ww 00 WN 00 00 rNrNNY 00 NN JO
O 000 yy 00 00 PP 00 N mm 00 VV000000 00 PO
i . i t i i i i i i i i
A AA I9 9 m 2 3 x 0 O 0 0000000 0 0 „
00 O D m A A 2 D m D a mm mmmmm D
O HH
N 3
00
O
11 A
<
W AA M O y G 9 m -� A m
00 !- 2 0 y N 0000000 A
y 00 2 m ti 3 O 1 0000000 ➢ (OII 0
O HH 0 ➢ 9 O D Z D Z y M p
C nm Z C S O O ti N D Z
D A 0 0 D 2 2 T
O O a ti m M 9 ra O
y C O 2 A Z m
W D O O O v O 0
o m
y
A
m 00 A m y y m 9 T 0000000 p O O
00T C C 9 C O C w r C 0000000 m S T m
OO C 9 T Z 2 L]0000mp y 3
9 33
3 as 3 3 3 P P 3 aaaaann m
D __ r0i D y D m D DD rYiHr��i�ir y 3 y
r N N G 9 V N 2222222 C 9 O
Z titi y 2 Z 2 Z C C Z -iti-1-Itititi 0 O A
ti 9 ti ti ti -i 0 W H y O C
O G 9
A 9 H
O
000 0 0 o O o O o 0 0 0000000 Y W o a
P
r rr r r Y Y Y W Y Y Y r YYYYYrr W Y O
P PP W P P A P A P p P P pPPPPPp P A P O
W m 2
00 O O O N O O N 0000000 -4
P WY O W p W m W WAWYrrY y p Z
PO N A V N O
YP O 7 YPNYY A
P Wr O W W P W mp W'-Yrr P P
A Ym O N Y N N m N Y Y N YNYWmmW A r N Z
G
W W P A
O
m a m r o
O O A m
P W 9
y O W O
O m
s m
3
m v
y ➢
y y
s m
W
m
x
y O
N N N
N O
S
m
n
a V W U JI n
2 ti
O <
O
O T
O O O D
ti m
0 0 o D
m m s
9
m m m m
m
D
V N N Y 3
W W WJ 000 00 C_
rm '
mJOWYWYpWWO mm UU y
rWY NrpmWU WpYWVr
U UNm0WmmJmWONW00 00 Om
m OOUOmUONUUrmmOW 00 WW mm O
N OOAUUOOUOPPUWOV OO 00 UU O
3 w
Z C <
c_c_ccc cccccccccc < x
_ m
r 22222_ 222 D m 4 G
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOp r A ti
m i
WWPWNNNrrrO n O
WYWWUWOJWUWUPWY < O m O
C A
r n
000000000000000
2 Ix
2 n
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD O G O
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr m a s
z
i m
( n W
U
-1
A
C9WYYYYYOOU2-190 O m A w
wnw mmmmm AOA'-0Dm -1 C m
w<Ommmmm DCnnW2 x 9 T m
M.9AmmVmV2w-1 m
Zxm 9 C 3
03 DD ptip22 W z r W
,oxxx wwE0m timr m m m
A9993wZmr W 3 W O N
HtiD AA9T < mT n
AAYOOO' AO AC A W A
CC29G<ONmaW <2 O 9
WWa c p9< mo < 9
~~m mm3W<Hv T ~
Z2m maw C O
C titi2 11w Z 2
w � w O W O
WI 3A
n m
ti 9 O Z40
< W Im
n
ti
O O D
m1 n
n
P P O
W C_
O O ti
O P O 2
O O o
0 0
O P O
O N O 2
G
A % O
W 9
O
O m
3 m
i
m /
n
s _
' W
W Y
r �
o y
t• n
n
F
r r
O C n
o a
m a
N �
� N a
a o.
N 3T
N C
O r'
r -
N
n y
• � n
� o
c
d
n
t�
a
w n r
x
o e
F Z
O
n �
O �
a w
0
W H
Y,
W
Y
N
O
H
W
H
O
yyy�
N
O
r
00000000 0 0 O MVH'N IF' F' Y IO' 1O ' N O rm rm Oro Ym rm rm rm Oro N
tFFF FFFF FFF F F IU . . N N F .
Y N N FN' H N N Y -wl �1 w O 0 w H O O F' w�p r r N N N w N N w N 5
00000000 OOO O 0 N WH N N O Y O S S w ,1 N w WN O Y H
r r w F avi.., ipp'pp i- o1w o� m u, p 0 o
om F'
N 0 Or 0 p Y N POg S S 000 r 0
YNm YOH OODNNNmPNNNm OH r O
OOOOOOY00 Nr00 00 < NYmm F 0O 0O 0m m roPDOOr0o
M
.
r t,
00000000 oro 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 a
Y r Y Y Y r r r r r r Y Y r H Y r r H r r Y Y Y r r r r Y r r r
00000000 000 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0
ro
a
n
v.
r r
.Pil vFi ro �� r w IY' o�o o mm wwi o f -wi rn F o o �� vwi
w N N F N�wil O FF' vii N H 0yOOOmNOON NN O m m m 0 -
W
c'
n
' � n
� o
w n 0 0 Y n 0 w w ✓7 •A w w w •A w w .'0 w C
a C 0 W 0 W 0 m m m m m m m m m m
b ✓ Y Y O n K O O m b a r Y 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 N
r H K K 0 m K Nm K K i1 cF N N �+ �h ii cF i+ K r0
m m m S m m ro d d N 3 ro N m K
m m m m W W W n (n m m M m m b m
> M M O P n H 'C H paj
3 H N C 0 H H a 'm1 h 0 a 0
b n b H 0 0 r K H �+
�s m o o m m
v v "wzr m n
wwwwwwww www w w www w wwww w
00000000000000 00o000000o0o0000 w0n'
$
wwww wwww www W W w NIO N N N N N N NN N r Y YYY Y r
FFFFFFFF WWW N r 0 �O�O m �1 O\ vl F W N Y O OZ
O W - A Y r N pS L+l C•J CJ N W W O A
K O 71 to b] K K 3 a
a n 3 O
N Om0 p +J O G a N m O b O K
0 m m m 'tl ro m m xl O m bJ 5 22rr M
°co roe w ,om m s y w w 0
m y s a W m c
m n rr' roC o o m
0 ro m
o m m
K m m
x
r
oP rn w
vwl Fr Grmp w o.
Om No brnP vo
N O O O 8 00 mT0i Y�i wc y.n wvl
8 N S
Q �
a
n
n
c�
a
e
m
mm- om n
F r r r r Z CZ y
I l l l l tl
m m o m o n
ry0m �ama `� ro
E N y �
K
P b
m N C N
y 3
A O
W C
� O
F+ c1
O
9 m
cF
5 n
� o
b z
� n
r, a ti
or-ao o x a
ONmN 0\ m K
�n mm� Fw m
W OL'FNW
O
n
b
� r
� m
z
0
m
a
0
y
n
FF
3
M
/D K
MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Administrative Assistant
RE: MEBCO Contract for Private Development S Amendment #1
DATE: August 10, 1989
INTRODUCTION•
The Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the Shakopee
City Council have approved the majority of the documents necessary
for the approval of the MEBCO tax increment project. The only
document which remains to be executed is the development agreement
between MEBCO Industries and the City of Shakopee and the
subsequent first amendment to the contract for Private Development.
BACKGROUND,
On May 9, 1989 the Shakopee City Council approved Resolution No.
3051 approving modification of the redevelopment plan for the
Minnesota River Valley Redevelopment Project No. 1, establishing
Tax Increment Financing District No. 7 located within Redevelopment
Project No. 1 and approving and adopting a Tax Increment Financing
Plan relating thereto.
MEBCO Industries, Inc. intends to begin construction of their
manufacturing facility in Shakopee within the next two weeks. At
this time it would be appropriate for the Shakopee City Council to
authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into a contract
for private development by and between the City of Shakopee and
MEBCO Industries, Inc. The development agreement describes the
acquisition and development plan for the MEBCO project. The
agreement also sets forth a construction time table and other
obligations of the developer. Finally, the agreement provides
financial assistance to the developer in the amount of $142,682
upon completion of the developer improvements as set forth in the
development agreement.
Due to the length of the development agreement, I have not included
a copy for your review. If any of the Council members would like
to review a copy prior to the meeting or at the meeting, please
contact me. One item of note, the contract sets forth a
construction date of August 1 and project completion date of March
31, 1990. MEBCO officials have requested that the Contract for
Private Development be amended pushing back the construction date
to September 1, 1989 and the completion date to December 31, 1990.
The approval of this request and MEBCO's delay in completing the
project prior to December 31. 1989 would impact the amount of Tax
Increment generated. Therefore, staff has included a provision in
Amendment #1 which reduces the amount of assistance available to
MEBCO in direct relation to the taxable value of the building and
percentage complete as of December 31. 1989. The First Amendment
to the Contract for Private Development has been attached for your
review.
If the City Council does not have any questions regarding the
development agreement, it would be appropriate at this time to
direct the appropriate City officials to enter into the Contract
for Private Development by and between the City of Shakopee and
MEBCO Industries, Inc. and the subsequent First Amendment to the
Contract for Private Development.
ALTERNATIVES-
1. Move to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute
the contract for private development by and between the City
of Shakopee and MEBCO Industries, Inc. and the subsequent
First Amendment to the Contract for Private Development.
2. Do not authorize the appropriate City officials to execute
the contract for private development by and between the City
of Shakopee and MEBCO Industries, Inc. and the subsequent
First Amendment.
3. Table action on this item pending further information from
staff.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends alternative #1.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Move to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the
contract for private development by and between the City of
Shakopee and MEBCO Industries, Inc. and the subsequent First
Amendment to the Contract for Private Development.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
CONTRACT FOR
PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE
DEVELOPMENT (the "Amendment" ) , dated as of the 1st day of
August, 1989, by and between the City of Shakopee (the "City" ) ,
a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota, having
its principal offices at 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee,
Minnesota - 55379; and Mebco Industries, Inc. (the "Developer" ) ,
a Minnesota corporation, having its principal offices at
1325 Eagandale Court, Suite 110, Eagan, Minnesota - 55121.
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the City and the Developer have entered
into a Contract For Private Development dated as of _
1989 (the "Development Agreement") ; and
WHEREAS, due to certain delays in the commencement
of the Project described in the Development Agreement, the
Developer has requested certain amendments thereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual
covenants hereinafter set forth, the City and the Developer
recite and agree as follows:
Section 1. Amendment of Section 3.4. Section
3.4 of the Development Agreement is amended to read as follows:
Section 3.4. Commencment and Completion of
Construction. The Deve oyer shall, subject to Unavoidable
Delays, commence construction of the Developer Improvements
on or before September 1, 1989, and, subject to Unavoidable
Delays, shall complete the construction of the Developer
Improvements on or before December 31, 1990.
Section 2. Amendment of Section 7.1. Section
7.1 of the Development Agreement is amended to read as follows:
Section 7.1. City Financial Assistance. In order
to induce the Developer to acquire the Development Property
and to acquire and construct the Developer Improvements,
the City agrees to provide financial assistance to the
Developer as provided in this Section. Upon completion
of the Developer Improvements in accordance with Article III
hereof and issuance of a certificate of completion in
accordance with Section 3.6, the City will pay to the
Developer the sum of $142, 682, less an amount equal
to the amount by which the tax increment portion of
the real estate taxes payable with respect to the
1
Development Property in 1991 is less than $44, 882, to
reduce the cost of acquisition of the Development Property;
provided that if the Developer Improvements are not
completed by December 31, 1990, the City shall have
no obligation to provide such financial assistance.
Section 3. Amendment of Section 11.13. Section
11. 13 of the Development Agreement is amended to read as
follows:
Section 11.13. Entire Agreement. This Agreement
comprises the entire agreement among the parties with
respect to the Development Property, the Developer
Improvements, Financing District No. 7 and other matters
covered hereby, and supercedes all other agreements
relating to such matters, including but not limited
to that certain agreement among Valley Industrial Park
Limited, the City of Shakopee and the Shakopee Public
Utilities Commission dated November 7, 1979, and filed
with the Scott County Recorder May 15, 1980, as Document
No. 21212.
Section 4 . effect on Development Agreement. Except
as specifically provided Sections 1 and 2, the Development
Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this First
Amendment to be duly executed in its name and on its behalf
and its seal to be hereunto duly affixed; and the Developer
has caused this First Amendment to be duly executed in its
name and on its behalf, on or as of the date first above
written.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
By
Its Mayor
And
Its Clerk
(SEAL]
MEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC. ,
DEVELOPER
By
Its President
2
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
SS
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
On this day of August, 1989, before me, a
Notary Public withinand for said County, appeared
and , to me personally known, who, being yy me
dulyswor�id say that they are, respectively, the Mayor
and the City Clerk of the City of Shakopee, that the foregoing
instrument was signed on behalf of the City by authority
of its City Council, and that they executed said instrument
as the free act and deed of the City.
Notary Public
[NOTARIAL SEAL]
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
SS
COUNTY OF J
On this day of August, 1989, before me, a
Notary Public within—and for said County, appeared
to me personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did
say that he is the President of Mebco Industries, Inc. , a
Minnesota corporation, that the foregoing instrument was
signed on behalf of said corporation, and that he executed
said instrument as the free act and deed of said corporation.
Notary Public
[NOTARIAL SEAL]
3
ONSENT
MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Senior Community Services Em loyment Program
DATE: August 11, 1989
INTRODUCTION:
The City has the opportunity to renew its contract with
Scott Cunty Human Services and continue the City's paticipation
in the Senior Community Services Employment Program.
BACKGROUND:
Since October of 1986, the City has been participating in
the Senior Community Services Employment Program of Scott County.
The program provides part-time subsidized employment
opportunities for eligible individuals in jobs providing services
to the elderly and the general community. Since the fall of
1986, Hazel Ecklund has been working 2 1/2 hours per day under
the program in the City Clerk's office. She has been purging
records according to the records retention schedule adopted by
the city Council previously. She has nearly completed her work
in this department. The engineering department would now like to
use her to inventory their records located in the basement. If
her work is completed before the contract expires, upon
notification, the county will place her in another position
elsewhere.
Total compensation is provided by the County. The agreement
is for the period beginning July 1, 1989 and ending June 30,
1990. It is identical to the previous agreements. A copy is on
file in Judy's office, if anyone desires to look at it.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Renew Agreement
2. Do not renew agreement
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Authorize proper city officials to enter into a public
sector work site agreement with the County of Scott for the
delivery of employment and training services through the Senior
Community Services Employment Program.
jc
COMcPNT I
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Dave Hutton, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Downtown Streetscape, Project No. 1987-2
DATE: August 9 , 1989
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is Resolution No. 3071 adopting the special assessments
for the Downtown Streetscape Project for Council consideration.
BACKGROUND:
On August 1 , 1989 the City Council closed the public hearing on
the proposed special assessments for the Downtown Streetscape
Project. There were several adjustments made to the proposed
assessments as discussed in staff' s July 25 , 1989 memo.
One of the adjustments made was to revise the project assessment
area at both the east end and the west end of the project. Staff
had revised the assessment area and had recommended to City
Council that the assessments for those areas eliminated from the
project be spread out over all the properties in the effected
area. The assessment table that was submitted to Council on
August 1 , 1989 was prepared on that recommendation.
Council indicated a preference for the City absorbing those costs
for the areas eliminated from the project area. Therefore, staff
was directed to amend the assessment role to reflect this change
in the assessments.
Staff has made the adjustments and the final assessment role is
attached for Council consideration. If Council has no other
questions or adjustments, attached is Resolution No. 3071 which
adopts the special assessments for the Downtown Streetscape
Project.
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Adopt the proposed assessments by Resolution No. 3071 .
2 . Deny Resolution No. 3071 .
3 . Direct staff to make adjustments to the assessment role
prior to adopting Resolution No. 3071 .
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends Alternative No . 1 , to adopt the special
assessments for the Downtown Streetscape Project by adopting
Resolution No. 3071 .
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer Resolution No. 3071 , A Resolution Adopting Assessments for
Downtown Streetscape Phase I, Parts I and 2, Project No. 1987-2
and move its adoption.
DH/pmp
DT
RESOLUTION NO. 3071
A Resolution Adopting Assessments
Downtown Streetscape Phase I, Parts 1 and 2
Project No. 1987-2
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by
law, the City Council of the City of Shakopee met and heard and
passed upon all objections to the proposed assessments of:
Downtown Streetscape Project Phase I , Parts 1 and 2
Includes the following streets:
2nd Avenue, from Sommerville to Atwood
Atwood Street, from 1st Avenue to 3rd Avenue
Fuller Street, from 1st Avenue to 3rd Avenue
Holmes Street, from 1st Avenue to 3rd Avenue
Lewis Street, from 1st Avenue to 3rd Avenue
Sommerville Street, from 1st Avenue to 3rd Avenue
By street lighting, sidewalk , curb and gutter , pavement,
sanitary sewers, watermain, storm sewers, and miscellaneous
streetscape items and appurtenances within those project
limits.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITT COUNCIL OF THE CITT OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1 . That such proposed assessment together with any
amendments thereof, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a
part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special
assessment against the lands named herein and each tract therein
included is hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed
improvements in the amount of the assessments levied against it.
2 . Such assessments shall be payable ir, equal annual
installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first
installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in
January , 1990 , and shall bear interest at the rate of 7 .75
percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this
assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added
the interest on the entire assessment from the date of this
resolution until December 31 , 1990 , and to each subsequent
installment when due shall be added the interest for one year on
all unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property 30 asseased may , at any time
prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor,
may pay the whole of the assessment on such property , with
interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer,
except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment
is paid within thirty (30 ) days from the adoption of this
resolution ; he may thereafter pay to the County Treasurer the
installment and interest in process of collection on the current
tax list, and he may pay the remaining principal balance of the
assessment to the City Treasurer.
4. The Clerk shall file the assessment rolls pertaining to
this assessment in his office and shall certify annually to the
County Auditor on or before October 10th of each year the total
amount of installments and interest which are to become due in
the following year on the assessment on each parcel of land
included in the assessment roll.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
1 . That such proposed assessments together with any
amendments for all those properties currently in use as
residential properties, shall be deferred without interest until
such time as those properties are converted to commercial uses.
The said deferred residential properties are marked "deferred" on
the aforementioned proposed assessment , a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. The deferred assessments will be subject to the same
conditions and interest rate as listed above in this resolution
except that the first installment is payable on the first Monday
in January of the year following the date the deferred
assessments cease. Interest will accrue on an annual basis on
the assessment during the life of the deferment.
3• The assessment will be deferred a maximum of 10 years
or until the properties are converted to commercial use ,
whichever comes first.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City
of Shakopee, Minnesota , held this _ day of ,
19 _
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this day
of , 19
City Attorney
DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE, PROJECT NO. 1987-2
ASSESSMENT TABLE Page 1
I I I I I
I FID I PROPERTY OWNER 1 DESCRIPTION I ASSESSMENT I
1 I I I
127-001130-0 IAmerican 011 Co. IN 100' of Lots 1 $3,298.00 1
1 15001 W. 80th St./Suite 881 1687, Blk. 20 1 1
1 IMpls. , MN 55437-5435 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
127-001135-0 (Richard Stoks IP.0.1-3 ,Blk. 211 $4,471 .00 I
[ [P.O. Box 65 [Lying N' rly of I I
I (Shakopee, MN 55379 ILn Beg 110.17 1 I
I I IS of NW Cor 1 1 I
I I ISE to Pt 138.851 1
I 1 IS of NE Cor 3 1 1
! I I I I
i I I 1 I
127-001140-0 (Gary 8 Randolph Laurent (Lot 6 , Blk. 21 1 $1 ,939.00 I
! 1128 S. Fuller I I I
I (Shakopee, MN 55379 I I I
I I I I I
127-001141-0 1Michael 8 Patricia Kikos (Lot 7, Blk. 21 1 $1 ,939.00 I
I 1116 E. 2nd St. I I I
I (Jordan, MN 55352
I I I I I
127-001142-0 ILeo McGovern 8 Wife !E 3/4 of Lot 8 1 $1 ,454.00 1
! (DEFERRED) 1218 W. 13t St. IBlk. 21 I I
1 (Shakopee, MN 55379 I I I
I I I I I
127-001143-0 ITotal Minnesota, Inc. ILot 9 ,10 8 W1/41 $4,362.00 1
1 [P.O. Box 500 lof 8 , Blk. 21 I I
I (Denver, CO 80201 I I I
! I 1 I I
127-001151-0 IAnn Golla IN 20' of E1/2 1 $989.00 1
! 1640 McDevitt St. lof S 1/2 of Lot [ I
I ]Shakopee, MN 55379 16, Blk. 22 [ 1
I 1 1 1 [
127-001152-0 (Steven 8 Brenda Olson IS 1/2 of Lots 1 $2,151 .00 1
1 17347 Coleen Circle 1687 EX N 20' ofl I
I (Eden Prairie, MN 55346 IE 1/2 of S 1/2 1 1
1 I !of Lot6 , B1k.221 I
! I I 1 1
127-001153-0 (Daniel Colich IN 1/2 of 687 Exl $1 ,061 .00 I
1 1124 W. 1st Ave. IN 27 .41of E 8911 I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 IBlk. 22 [ I
I I I I I
127-001154-0 !Arlo Lee IN 27 .4 ' of E8911 $743.00 I
! 1785 Ojibwa Rd. N. [of N 1/2 of Lotl I
I IBrainard, MN 56401 1687 , Blk. 22 1 I
1 1 1 1 I
127-001155-0 IDaniel Colich ILot 8 , Blk. 22 1 $1 ,939.00 1
I 1124 W. tat Ave. I I I
I
[Shakopee, MN 55379 I I I
I i I I I
ASSESSMENT TABLE
Page 2
I I I I I
I PID ! PROPERTY OWNER 1 DESCRIPTION 1_1
ASSESSMENT
1-1
127-001156-0 ICharles & Lola Mensing (Lot 9 Ex W 36 ' 1 $1 ,949.00 1
1 1117 S. Fuller lof S 75' ,B1k.221 I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 1 1
1 I
127-001157-0 [Charles & Lola Mensing IW 36' of S 75 ' I $1 ,928.00 1
! (DEFERRED) 1117 S. Fuller lof 9 & all ofI I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 110, Blk. 22 1 1
I I
127-001164-0 IVFW Post 4046 Shakopee IS 10' of N 80 ' 1 $612.00 1
I 1132 E. First I& W 36' of N70' I I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 Iof Lot 6 ,B1k.231 1
I i
127-001165-0 IBruce Berme[ IS 39 ' of 6 & S ! $1 ,592.00 I
I 16320 Pheasant Court 123 ' of N 103' I I
I (Edina, MN 55435 lof 6 & E 15' I !
I I lof S 62' of 7 , I I
iBlk. 23 I I
127-001166-0 !Joseph Topic Jr. IE 24' of N 70' 1 $967 .00 1
1 !P.O. Box 317 ]of 6 , Ilk. 23 1 I
1 !Shakopee, MN 55379 I I I
! I I 1 I
127-001167-0 IVFW Post 4046 Shakopee IE 1/2 of Ex E 1 $907 .00 I
1 1132 E. First 115' of S 62' 1 I
1 IShakopee, MN 55379 lof 7 , Blk. 23 1 1
I I
127-001168-1 (Earl & Virginia Dressen !W 1/2 of 7 , I E969.00 !
I 11529 W. 6th 1Blk. 23 I I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 1 I I
I I
127-001169-0 (Arnold Theis IE 26' of 8 , 1 $840 .00 I
1 1122 E. 1st IBlk. 23 I I
1 IShakopee, MN 55379 I ! !
I I I I I
127-001170-0 ]Joseph & Monica Sullivan IW 1/2 & W4 ' of I $1 ,260.00 1
1 15133 Dugan Plaza IE1/2 of 8 & E I I
I [Edina, MN 55435 14-5/6' of 9 1 I
1 I IBlk. 23 1 I
127-001171-0 IBruce Garness & Wife IW 24' of E 28- 1 $808.00 1
1 11197 VanBuren St. 15/6' of 9 , I I
1 IShakopee, MN 55379 IBlk. 23 I I
I I I I I
127-001172-0 (King Solomon Lodge IW 31-1/6' of 9 1 $1 ,002.00 I
I 1110 1/2 1st Ave. E. IBlk. 23 I !
I IShakopee, MN 55379 I I I
I I I I I
a�
ASSESSMENT TABLE Page 3
I I I I
I I I I I
I PID ( PROPERTY OWNER I DESCRIPTION I ASSESSMENT I
1-1 1-1—
127-001173-0 ]Kevin A Vonda Hogan IW 38 1/2'of 10 1 52,553 .00 I
1 13005 135th St. IBIk. 23 I I
] {Burnsville, MN 55337 I I I
I I I I I
127-001174-1 (Rueben Ruehle 8 Wife IE 21 .5 of LOt10i $695.00 i
( 1108 E. First IBlk. 23 1 i
I ]Shakopee, MN 55379 I I I
I I I I I
127-001182-0 (Eugene Pearson ILot 6 , Blk. 24 1 $1 ,689.00 1
I IRR 1 Box 251 I I ]
I ]Jordan, MN 55352 I I I
I I I I I
127-001183-0 ]Steven 6 Warren Clay IE 27' A S 41 ' I $881 .00 1
1 1232 E tat Avenue lof E 30' of 7 1 I
1 (Shakopee, MN IBlk. 24 I !
I ! I I
127-001184-0 ;Motor Parts of Shakopee IW 1/2 6 N 101 ' I $1 ,064.00 1
I 1230 E. First Ave. lof W 3 ' of E I I
i !Shakopee, MN 55379 130 ' of 7 ,B1k.241 I
i I I 1 I
127-001185-0 (Shakopee Bowl, Inc. ]Lot 8 , Blk. 24 1 $1 ,939.00 1
1 1222 E. First Ave. I I I
I {Shakopee, MN 55379 I I I
1 1 I I I
127-001186-0 (Richard Halver ILot 9 , Blk. 24 I $1 ,939.00 I
I 1460 Great Plains Blvd. I I I
{ !Chaska, Mn 55318 I I I
I I I
127-001188-0 !Terrence Mennen h Wife IN 26' of 10 ( $355.00 {
1 11116 Jackson St. IBlk. 24 I I
( IShakopee, MN 55379 I I I
I I I I I
127-001189-0 (Wallace Perry IS 21 ' of N 47 ' { $287 .00 1
1 1834 S. Lewis lof 10, Blk. 24 I !
I IShakopee, MN 55379 1 ! I
1 I
127-001190-0 ]Roman Kopp Jr. IN 35.45' of I $1 ,765.00 I
I 1202 N. Water Street IS 95 ' of 10 I I
I INorthfield, MN 55057 IBlk. , 24 ! !
I I
127-001191-0 ]Wallace Kopisca 13 59.55' of I $1 ,414.00 I
I 113415 Marystown Rd. 110, Blk. 24 I !
I
[Shakopee, MN 55379 1 ! I
I I
I I
I I ! ! I
1 I I
I l I
ASSESSMENT TABLE Page 4
I I I I
I I I I I
I PID I PROPERTY OWNER I DESCRIPTION I ASSESSMENT I
I I I I I
I I I I I
127-001198-0 INorman & Karoline Monroe ILot 9, Blk. 25 1 $1 ,939.00 1
1 1312 E. First Ave. I I I
I (Shakopee, MN 55379 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
127-001199-0 (David & Catherine Eckart (Lot 10, Blk. 251 $1 ,939.00 '1
1 1300 E. First Avenue I I I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
127-001128-0 IHastings & D Railway ILots 1-3 Ex N 1 $3 ,380.00 1
1 1547 W Jackson B1vd.P.O.Box 62051P/O 2 6 3 1 1
1 (Chicago, IL 60680 IBlk. 20 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
127-001129-0 (Edward & Jeanette Gilles {P/O 2-5 Com NW 1 $4,425.00 1
I (DEFERRED) 1126 S. Atwood ICor of Lot 1 E I I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 Ion N line of I I
1 I 1162 85 to POB I i
I I IS 37 ' E 15' 1 1
I I 1207 .13 ' N 80 ' 1 1
1 I IW 216.95,B1k.201 I
I I I 1 1
127-001129-1 ICy's Standard Service IS 42' of Lots 1 $2,166.00 1
1 1312 W. First 16&7, Ilk. 20 1 1
1 IShakopee, MN 55379 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
127-001134-0 (City of Shakopee (Part of Lots { $1 ,746 .00 1
I 1129 E. First Ave. 11-3 , Blk. 21 1 1
{ IShakopee, MN 55379 I I I
I I 1 I I
127-001144-0 (Art Berens & Sons, Inc. ILots 1 ,2,3 1 $9,497 .00 1
I 1123 W. 2nd IBlk. 22 1 I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 I I I
I i I I I
127-001145-0 IArt Berens & Sons, Inc. IS 102' of 4 1 $2,299.00 1
1 1123 W. 2nd IBlk. 22 1 I
1 IShakopee, MN 55379 1 I I
127-001146-0 (Eugene Brown IN 32' of S 62' 1 $1 ,785.00 1
1 11661 W 6th Ave. lof 5 , Blk. 22 {
1 IShakopee, MN 55379 1 I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
l 1 I 1
II G
ASSESSMENT TABLE Page 5
I I I I
I I I I I
I PID I PROPERTY OWNER I DESCRIPTION I ASSESSMENT I
1-1 1-1-1
127-001147-0 (Joseph Topic Jr & Rita IS 1/2 of N 40' 1 $1 ,331 .00 1
1 1405 E. 11th lof 4&5,Blk. 22 I I
I (Shakopee, MN 55379 I I I
i I I I 1
127-001148-0 IStalar IN 20 ' of Lots 1 $1 ,338.00 1
I IS Davies, Stanley 1455 , Blk. 22 1 1
I 1927 S. Lewis I I I
I [Shakopee, MN 55379 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 1
127-001149-0 [Mertz-Horeish, Inc. IS 30' of 5 1 $1 ,329.00 I
1 1140 S. Holmes IBlk. 22 I I
1 (Shakopee, MN 55379 I I I
I I I I I
127-001150-0 (William Daniels IN 40' of S 10211 $2,276.00 1
1 14539 Heritage Hills CR lof 5 , Blk-. 22 1 1
1 (Bloomington, MN 55437 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
127-001158-0 (First National Bank Shakopee (Lots 1 ,2,3 & 1 $10 ,021 .00 I
1 1129 S. Holmes IW 1/2 of S 10211
1 IShakopee, MN 55379 ]of 4 , Blk. 23 1 I
1 1 1 1 I
127-001159-0 IWilliam Wermerskirchen ILot 4&5 , Ex N [ $4,528.00 1
1 1138 S Lewis 1401 , Blk. 23 1 I
I ]Shakopee, MN 55379
127-001162-0 !Betti Lu Prow IN 40' of 4 & 1 $1 ,655.00 1
I 1126 S. Lewis IS 22 ' of N 40 ' 1 i
I IShakopee, HN 55379 [of 5, Blk. 23 I i
I I I I I
127-001163-0 (Frances Topic IN 18' of 5 1 $1 ,217 .00 ;
I
1407 E 11th IBlk. 23 i
I [Shakopee, MN 55379 I
I
127-001179-0 ;Eugene & Esther Brown ILot 3 ,4 & E 1 ' 1 $8,473-00 1
I 11661 W. 6th Ave. lof 2 , Blk. 24 I I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 I
I I 1
127-001180-0 (Darrel & Joyce Yohnke ILot 5 Ex N 1 $1 ,996.00 1
I 1148 Sommerville 164 1/2, Blk. 241 1
I IShakopee, MN 55379 1 I 1 1
I
127-001181-0 (Audrey McGovern IN 11 112 ' of S 1 $1 ,665.00 1
1 1125 W. 10th 179' & N 63' 1 1
IShakopee, MN 55379 lof 5 , Blk. 24
127-001192-0 (Bart Partners Mots 1 ,2 ,3 1 $9,488.00 1
I 14804 W. 60th St. IBIk. 25 1 1
1 [Edina, HN 55424 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1-1 1-1-1
ASSESSMENT TABLE Page 6
I I I I
I I I I I
I PID I PROPERTY OWNER I DESCRIPTION I ASSESSMENT I
11 1 I 1
127-001226-0 ]Ronald Scherer 6 Alice ]Lot 10 Ex S I $2,719.00 I
1 (DEFERRED) 11037 Bluff Avenue 124.51 , Blk. 28 1 I
I - IShakopee, MN 555379 I I I
I I I 1 I
127-001227-0 ]Douglas Culhane IS 24.5 ' of 10 I $943 .00 1
I 12124 Bridge Spur Crossing IBlk. 28 1 1
I ISbakopee, MN 55379 1 1 1
I I I I I
127-001233-0 INW Bell Telephone Co./Tax Mgr. IS 12' of Lot 6 1 $671 .00 1
1 1100 S 19th St. , /1050 1& S 12' of E I I
I 10maha, NE 68102 148' of 7 ,B1k.291 I
1 . 1 1 1 [
127-001234-0 INW Bell Telephone Co./Tax Mgr. IN 130 ' of Lot6 1 $6,489.00 1
1 1100 S 19th St. , #1050 16 N 130' of E I I
I (Omaha, NE 68102 148' of 7 ,B1k.291 I
I I I 1 1
127-001235-0 INW Bell Telephone Co./Tax Mgr. IW 12' of Lot 7 1 $5,522.00 ]
] 1100 S 19th St. , #1050 ILot 8 8 E 1/3 1 1
] ]Omaha, NE 68102 1of 9 Ex RR I I
I I IBlk. 29 I
127-001236-0 !Joseph Topic Jr. IW 2/3 of Lot 9 1 $6,169.00 1
1 IP.O. Box 317 IEx RR 6 all of I I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 110 , Blk. 29 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
127-001248-0 (Keith Eastman IS 50 1/2' of 1 $3,303.00 1
1 1152752 Thistle Dr. (Lots 6 A P/0 I I
I (Fountain Hills, AZ 85268 !Alley abutting I I
I I ]said lots 7 1 1
1 I IBlk. 31 1 1
I I I 1 1
127-001249-0 IVeronica Case IN 91 112' of 6 ] $4,224.00 1
[ (DEFERRED) 1210 S. Holmes ]Lot 7 Ex RR I I
I - IShakopee, MN 55379 IBlk. 31 I I
I I I I I
127-001250-0 ICarol Eastman ILot 8 A P/0 1 $3,562.00 1
1 1152752 Thistle Dr. [Alley abutting I I
I IFountain Hills, AZ 85268 ]the E 20 ' of 8 I I
I I IBlk. 31 I I
I I I I I
127-001251-0 IMar,jorie Henderson ILot 9, B1k.31 1 $3,662.00 1
I
1905 S. Holmes I II
IShakopee, MN 55379 1 I I
127-001252-0 IMar,jorie Henderson ]Lot 70, Blk. 311 $3,662.00 1
1 1905 S. Holmes I I I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 1 1 [
1 1 1 1 1
1 1-1-1
ASSESSMENT TABLE Page 7
I I I
i I I I I
1 PID I PROPERTY OWNER I DESCRIPTION I ASSESSMENT I
11 1 1 1
127-001256-0 (Jerome Wampach [Lots 4 ,5 ,6 1 $3,415.00 1
I 1524 Holmes St IBlk. 32 1 1
i IShakopee, MN 555379 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 1
127-001257-0 (Jerome Wampach ILot 7 , blk. 32 1 $3,415.00 1
I 1524 Holmes St I I I
i IShakopee, MN 555379 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 1
127-001258-0 [Thomas Gestach (Lot 8 8 E 38' 1 $5,577.00 1
1 1135 Crosstown Blvd. t12 lof 9 , Blk. 32 1 I
I (Chaska, Mn 55318 1 I I
I I I I I
127-001259-0 (Jerome Wampach IW 22' of 9 8 E [ $2,106.00 1
1 1524 Holmes St 115' of 10, I 1
I IShakopee, MN 555379 IBlk. 32 I I
I I i I I
127-001260-0 ]Daniel Lebens IW 45' of 10 [ $2,965.00 1
I 1207 1/2 S. Atwood IBlk. 32 I i
1 IShakopee, MN 55379 1 1 I
I I I i I
127-001264-0 (Thomas 8 Lucille Novitzki IN 62' of Lot 1 $3,691 .00 1
I (DEFERRED) 1208 Atwood 1687 8 W 42' of I I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 lof S 80 ' of 7 1 I
I I IB1k. 33 I I
I l I I I
127-001265-0 IDennis Schmitt 8 Wife IS 80 ' of Lot 6 1 $4,358.00 1
I (DEFERRED) 1535 E 8th Ave 18 E 18' of S801I I
IShakopee, MN 55379 [of 7 , Blk. 33 1 1
1 1 I 1 1
127-001218-0 (Frederick Houle 8 Wife IS 90-3/10' of ] $2,040.00 i
[ (DEFERRED) 1231 S Sommerville ILots 1 8 2 ExRRI 1
I IShakopee, MN 55379 IBlk. 28 1 I
I I I I I
127-001219-0 [Charles Borchard IN 51-7/10' of 1 $1 ,652.00 1
I (DEFERRED) 1225 S. Sommerville 1182, Blk. 28 1 1
1 IShakopee, MN 55379 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
127-001228-0 (City of Shakopee [Lot 1 8 2 1 $3 ,804.00 1
1 1129 E. First Ave. IBlk. 29 1 I
1 IShakopee, MN 55379 I I I
I I I I I
127-001238-0 ]Mona Strunk (Lots 182 lying 1 $1 ,532.00 1
I (DEFERRED) 1103 E. 3rd ls'erly ofn'erlyl I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 151 ' , EX S 50' 1 I
I I lof E 501 of 2 1 I
i I IBlk. 30 I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
ASSESSMENT TABLE Page 8
I i I I
I I I I I
I PID I PROPERTY OWNER I DESCRIPTION I ASSESSMENT I
1-1 1--1--
_ 1
127-001238-1 (David A Karen Moonen IN'erly 51 ' of 1 $1 ,336 .00 i
1 1236 S Lewis Box 300 (Lots 1A2 A S I I
I (Shakopee, MN 55379 11/2 of vacated I I
I I lalley on n'erlyl I
I I Iside lots I I
I I IBlk. 30 1 I
I I I I I
127-001239-0 (James 8 Berit Gerhardson IS 50' of E 50' 1 $836 .00 1
I (DEFERRED) 17724 Hampshire Ave N lof 2 , Blk. 30 1 1
1 (Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
127-001240-0 (Calvin A Rosemary Brown [Lot 3 , Blk. 30 1 $1 ,846 .00 1
1 1956 S. Holmes I I I
I (Shakopee, MN 55379 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
127-001241-0 (Shakopee Investment One [Lot 4 A N 81 ' 1 $2,744.00 1
I 18520 W. 135th St. lof 5 , Blk. 30 1 1
1 (Apple Valley, MN 55124 1 [ 1
I I I 1 1
127-001242-0 IHoffman Family Partnership [S 60' of 5 1 $1 ,529.00 1
1 1135 E. 3rd IBlk. 30 1 I
1 (Shakopee, MN 55379 1 1 I
I I I I I
127-001245-0 IThe Stans Foundation ]Lot 1 , Blk. 31 1 $1 ,846 .00 1
I (DEFERRED) 1350 W. Colorado Blvd. #315 1 1 1
1 (Pasadena, CA 91105 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
127-001246-0 (Ervin Monnens A Wife (Lot 2, Blk. 31 1 $1 ,846 .00 1
I (DEFERRED) 1129 W. 3rd I I I
[ IShakopee, MN 55379 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
127-001247-0 (First Nat. Bank - Shakopee (Lots 3-5 AS' rlyl $5,151 .00 1
1 1129 S. Holmes 11/2 of ad,jacentl I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 [vacated alley I I
I I IBlk. 31
127-001253-0 (Donald Yahnke (Lot 1 , Blk. 32 1 $1 ,846 .00 1
( (DEFERRED) 1239 W. 3rd Ave. I I I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
127-001254-0 (Susan Niewind Mot 2, Blk. 32 1 $1 ,846.00 1
I(DEFERRED) 1229 W. 3rd Ave. I I I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 1 1 1
1 1 I 1 1
127-001255-0 ]Diane Heinz ILot 3, Blk. 32 1 $1 ,846.00 1
I (DEFERRED) 1219 W. 3rd Ave. I I I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 1 1 1
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
v
ASSESSMENT TABLE Page 9
I I I
I PID I PROPERTY OWNER I DESCRIPTION I ASSESSMENT I
1-1 1-1-1
127-001256-0 (Jerome Wampach $Lots 4 ,5 ,6 I $2,395.00 1
I 1524 Holmes St. IBlk. 32 I 1
$Shakopee, MN 55379 1 I 1
I I 1
127-001263-0 (John Ries Jr. (Lot 5 Ex W 2 1 $2,364.00 1
1 1220 W. 3rd Ave. lof 5 731 , 1 1
1 (Shakopee, MN 55379 IBlk. 33 1 I
I I I I I
I I I 1$229,166.00 1
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator II
FROM: Dave Hutton, City Engineef--bs0i
SUBJECT: 1989 Pavement Preservation Project - Seal Coat
Project No. 1989-10
DATE: August 9 , 1989
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is Resolution No. 3100, A Resolution Accepting Bids and
Awarding the Contract for the Pavement Preservation Project-
Sealcoat, Project No. 1989-10.
BACKGROUND:
On July 11 , 1989 the City Council ordered the advertisement for
bids for the Pavement Preservation - Sealcoat Project.
On August 8 , 1989 at 10:00 A.M. bids were received and publicly
opened for Project No. 1989-10 , Pavement Preservation - Sealcoat
Project. The total of three bids were received and summarized in
the attached resolution. The low bids are tabulated below:
Contractor Citi Total Bid
Allied Blacktop Maple Grove $73,952.20
Astech Corp. St. Cloud $75,873.00
Hugo Schulz Lakefield $86 ,277 .30
The Engineering Department has reviewed all bids for completeness
and also the qualifications of Allied Blacktop, the low bidder,
and have determined that they are able to perform the work as
described by the plans and specifications.
The Engineer' s estimate for this project was approximately
$52,000.00 but that did not include cracksealing which was added
in after the estimate was prepared. The cracksealing was bid at
approximately $10,100.00 . The bids came in slightly higher than
what was estimated because the City has not run a sealcoating
project for several years now. The Public Works Department has
an annual budget of $95 ,000 .00 for pavement preservation.
In conformance with the new change order policy, staff is also
requesting that the City Council authorize a contingency equal to
10% of the project for use to cover any change orders. 108 of
the contract is $7 ,395 .22 . Essentially the new change order
policy authorizes the City Engineer to approve of all change
orders up to an amount approved by Council at the time a project
is awarded and staff is now requesting that amount.
Attached is Resolution No. 3100 which accepts bids on this
project.
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Accept the low bid and adopt Resolution No. 3100 awarding
the contract to Allied Blacktop.
2. Reject the low bid and award the contract to the second low
bidder or another bidder.
3. Reject all bids and rebid.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 , accept the low bid and award
the contract to Allied Blacktop of Maple Grove, MN.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer Resolution No. 3100 , A Resolution Accepting Bid on the 1989
Pavement Preservation Project - Sealcoat, Project No. 1989-10 and
move its adoption.
Approve of the 10% contingency requested by staff for use by the
Contract Administrator in authorizing change orders on this
project.
DH/pmp
MEM3100
RESOLUTION NO. 3100
A Resolution Accepting Bid On
The 1989 Paveiment Preservation - Sealcoat
Prosect go. 1989-10
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the
Pavement Preservation Project - Sealcoat, bids were received ,
opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids
were received complying with the advertisement:
Allied Blacktop $73 ,952.20
Astech Corp. $75 ,873 .00
Hugo Schulz $86 ,277 .30
AND WHEREAS, it appears that Allied Blacktop Company,
10503 - 89th Avenue North , Maple Grove, MN 55369 is the lowest
responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1 . The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to enter into a contract with Allied Blacktop Company,
in the name of the City of Shakopee for the improvement of
various streets by sealcoating, according to the plans and
specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file
in the office of the City Clerk.
2 . The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their
bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the
next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been
signed.
Adopted in session of the City Council of
the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
19_•
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this day of
19_•
City Attorney
R (i, uise. ) ,QvX0 lac
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Ray Ruuska, Engineering Coordinator
SUBJECT: Lions Park Pond, Project No. 1989-11
DATE: August 14, 1989
INTRODUCTION:
Bids have been received for the above referenced project. All
bids greatly exceed committed funding by the Lion ' s Club of
Shakopee.
BACKGROUND:
The Shakopee Lion ' s Club has committed $40 ,000 .00 toward
construction of a pond in the southern part of Lion' s Park. City
Council ordered preparation of plans and specifications and
advertisement for bids for this project. On August 11 , 1989 at
10:00 A.M. four bids were received as listed below:
Contractor Total Bid
Tim's Lawn and Landscaping $ 61 ,680 .00
w/Alt. $56 ,460 .00
Busse Construction $63,530.00
No Alt. Bid
Richard Knutson, Inc. $69 ,520 .00
w/Alt. $64 ,558 .00
W.J. Ebertz Co. $77,050.00
w/Alt. Same Amount
Due to the difference between committed funding and the low bid,
LeRoy Houser , acting for the Lion ' s Club , has requested
postponement of Council action on the award of this project, to
allow the executive board of the Shakopee Lion' s Club to consider
the club' s position now that the bids are known. The Shakopee
Lions meet on Wednesday , August 16 , 1989. City Council can then
consider an award of this contract on September 5 , 1989 •
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends postponement of City Council action on award of
this project to allow the executive board of the Shakopee Lion' s
Club to reconsider the funding of this project.
DH/pmp
POND
CONSENT lid
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Dave Hutton, City Engineer '
SUBJECT: Market Street and Various Alleys
DATE: August 10 , 1989
INTRODUCTION:
Staff is requesting permission to advertise for the bids for the
construction of Market Street between 1st Avenue and Bluff Avenue
and the Alleys in Block 81 , Block 55, Block 102 and Block 7.
BACKGROUND:
On August 16 , 1988 the City Council ordered the advertisement for
bids for the construction of Market Street between 1st Avenue and
Bluff Avenue. On September 7 , 1988 the bids for Market Street
were publicly opened and read. Because all of the bids were
higher than estimated, the City Council of Shakopee rejected all
bids and staff recommended rebidding the project by combining it
with other projects in order to make a larger overall project in
an attempt to receive better bids.
Over the past year, the City Council has ordered plans and
specifications prepared for paving various alleys in the City of
Shakopee. The alleys in Block 81 , Block 55, Block 102 and Block
7 have all been designed and are ready for bidding. Staff feels
that adding the four alleys to the Market Street Project would
substantially reduce the bid price for all projects combined.
Staff will be combining all five of these projects into the
Market Street Project Number, namely Project No. 1988-6.
Attached is Resolution No. 3102, which approves the plans and
specifications and orders the advertisement for bids for Market
Street and the four alleys, Project No. 1988-6 .
The proposed bidding and construction schedule for this project
is as follows:
Advertise August 17
Advertise August 24
Open Bids September 1
Award Contract September 5
Start Construction September 12
Completion Date November 15 (60 Days)
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Adopt Resolution No. 3102 authorizing staff to advertise for
bids for this project.
2 . Deny Resolution No. 3102 .
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 .
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer Resolution No. 3102 , A Resolution Approving Plans and
Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for Market
Street from 1st Avenue to Bluff Avenue (Project No. 1988-6) ;
Alley in Block 81 (Project No . 1989-1 ) ; Alley in Block 55
(Project No. 1988-7) ; Alley in Block 102 (Project No. 1989-8) ;
Alley in Block 7 (Project No. 1989-3) and Hereby Combining All of
the Above Projects Into One Project Number, Namely Project No.
1988-6 and move its adoption.
DH/pmp
MEM3102
RESOLUTION NO. 3102
A Resolution Approving Plans And Specifications
And Ordering Advertisement For Bids. For Market Street
From tat Avenue to Bluff Avenue (Project No. 1988-6) ;
Alley in Block 81 (Project No. 1989-1 ) ;
Alley in Block 55 (Project No. 1.988-T);
Alley in Block 102 (Project No. 1989-8) ;
Alley in Block T (Project No. 1989-3)
And Hereby Combining All of the Above Projects
Into One Project Number, Namely Project No. 1988-6
WHEREAS, pursuant to the following Resolution Numbers and
date of adoption by City Council :
Project Resolution No. Pate of Adoption
Market Street 2914 6/21/88
Alley in Block 81 2968 11/1/88
Alley in Block 55 2926 7/19/88
Alley in Block 102 3067 6/20/89
Alley in Block 7 3002 1/1T/89
David Hutton , City Engineer , has prepared plans and
specifications for the improvements of Market Street by pavement,
curb h gutter and storm sewer and the Alleys in Blocks 55 , 81 ,
102 and 7 by pavement and have presented such plans and
specifications to the Council for approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1 . Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on
file and of record in the Office of the City Engineer, are hereby
approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in
the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertise-
ment for bids upon the making of such improvements under such
approved plans and specifications. The Advertisement for Bids
shall be published for ten days, shall specify the work to be
done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Clerk
until 10:00 A.M. , on September 1 , 1989 , at which time they will
be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by
the City Clerk and Engineer, or their designated party, will then
be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:00 P.M. ,
or thereafter on September 5 , 1989 , in the Council Chambers, and
that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the
City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier' s check,
bid bond or certified check payable to the order of the City of
Shakopee for not less than five (5% ) percent of the amount of the
Bid.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee , Minnesota , held this day of ,
79_•
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of , 19—.
City Attorney
CONSENT
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
tai
FROM: Dave Hutton, City Engineer -
SUBJECT: Bluff Avenue - Marschall Road to Prairie Street
Project No. 1989-12
DATE: August 10 , 1989
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is Resolution No. 3103 , Receiving a Report and Calling
for a Public Hearing on Street Improvements to Bluff Avenue from
Marschall Road to Prairie Street.
BACKGROUND:
On November 15, 1988 City Council ordered the preparation of a
feasibility report for street improvements to Bluff Avenue
between Marschall Road and Naumkeg Street by Resolution No. 2973•
The feasibility report has been completed and the report is
attached for Council review. Staff has expanded the project
limits as ordered by City Council to include other streets in
this area that are currently not improved. Bluff Avenue between
Naumkeg Street and Prairie Street is currently a gravel road ,
Prairie Street between 1st Avenue and Bluff Avenue is also a
gravel road and Naumkeg Street between 1st Avenue and Bluff
Avenue is partially gravel and partially paved. The feasibility
report has added these sections of streets to the study.
Attached is Resolution No. 3103, which receives a feasibility
report and calls for a public hearing on the proposed
improvements. The resolution sets a date of the public hearing
for September 5 , 1989.
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Adopt Resolution No. 3103 and hold a public hearing on the
proposed improvements on September 5 , 1989.
2. Do not adopt Resolution No. 3103 •
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 .
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer Resolution No. 3103, A Resolution Receiving A Report and
Calling a Hearing on Improvements to Bluff Avenue Between
Marschall Road and Prairie Street, Naumkeg Street Between 1st
Avenue and Bluff Avenue, and Prairie Street Between 1st Avenue
and Bluff Avenue, Project No. 1989-12 and move its adoption.
RESOLUTION N0. 3103
A Resolution Receiving A Report
And Calling A Bearing On Improvement
To Bluff Avenue, Marschall Road to Prairie Street
Naunkeg Street, 13t Avenue to Bluff Avenue and
Prairie Street, 13t Avenue to Bluff Avenue
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 2973 of the City Council
adopted November 15 , 1988 , a report has been prepared by David
Hutton, City Engineer , with reference to the improvements of
Bluff Avenue, Marschall Road to Prairie Street; Naumkeg Street,
1st Avenue to Bluff Avenue; and Prairie Street, 1st Avenue to
Bluff Avenue, and this report was received by the Council on
August 15 , 1989 •
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITI COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1 . The Council will consider the improvement of Bluff
Avenue, Between Marschall Road and Prairie Street; Prairie Street
Between 1st Avenue and Bluff Avenue and Naumkeg Street, Between
1st Avenue and Bluff Avenue all by street and storm sewer
improvements in accordance with the report. and the assessment of
abutting and benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost
of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at
an estimated total cost of the improvement of $267 ,100 .00 .
2 . A public hearing shall be held on such proposed
improvements on the 5th day of September, 1989 , at 7:30 P.N. , or
thereafter, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, at 129 East 1st
Avenue and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of
such hearing and improvement as required by law.
3 . The work of this project is hereby designated as part of
the 1989-12 Public Improvement Program.
Adopted in session of the City Council of
the City of Shakopee, Minnesota , held this day of
19_•
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this day of
19
City Attorney
FEASIBILITY REPORT
IMPROVEMENT OF BLUFF AVENUE
BETWEEN MARSCHALL ROAD AND NAUMKEG STREET
hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a
duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
Date LO Registration No. 19133 .
AUGUST 1989
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
Feasibility Report
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Proposed Improvements . . . . . . . . . . 2
Right of way . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Estimated Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Conclusions and Recommendations . . . . . . 5
Appendix
Project Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Bluff Ave. Zoning and Floodplain Map . . . . 7
Existing Pavement Conditions . . . . . . . . 8
Proposed Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Proposed Storm Sewer . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Proposed Right of Nay . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Property Location Map . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Cost Estimates/Assessment Calculations
A. Bluff Ave. - Marschall Road to Naumkeg 13-16
B. Naumkeg Street - 1st Ave. to Bluff Ave. 17-18
C. Bluff Avenue - Naumkeg St. to Dakota St. 19-22
and Prairie Street
INTRODUCTION
The City Council of the City of Shakopee ordered the preparation
of a feasibility report for street improvements to Bluff Avenue
between Marschall Road and Naumkeg Street by Resolution No. 2973
on November 15 , 1988 . This report expands the project scope to
also include street improvements to Bluff Avenue between Naumkeg
Street and Dakota Street, Naumkeg Street between 1st Avenue and
Bluff Avenue, and Prairie Street between 1st Avenue and Bluff
Avenue.
BACKGROUND
Bluff Avenue is situated in one of the oldest areas of Shakopee.
The proposed Bluff Avenue is partially unplatted property with
the remainder in the East Shakopee Plat and bounded to the east
by the Halo 1st Addition.
Bluff Avenue between Naumkeg Street and Marschall Road is
currently unimproved. Bluff Avenue between Naumkeg and Dakota is
currently a gravel road . The remainder of Bluff Avenue west of
Dakota Street is paved with bituminous pavement, but there is no
curb and gutter.
The proposed Naumkeg Street exists as a partial gravel street,
partial biuminous street and is located in the East Shakopee
Plat. There is no curb and gutter on this block.
The proposed Prairie Street is currently a gravel road and is
located in the East Shakopee Plat.
This area is zoned R-3 , Mid-Density Residential, to the north of
Bluff Avenue between Naumkeg and Prairie Street. All remaining
areas are zoned B-1 , Highway Business . Please refer to the
zoning map in the appendix.
This area is currently served by City sanitary sewer and
watermain.
Based on previous construction projects and available data, the
dolomite bedrock is very near to the surface in this area.
The land north of Bluff Avenue is essentially in the floodplain
of the Minnesota River. There is a level plateau along Bluff
Avenue that varies from 100 - 200 feet in width before the ground
drops away to the river that is apparently out of the floodplain
and available for development.
1
SCOPE
This report studies the feasibility of permanent street
construction, including any storm sewers, for Bluff Avenue
between Marschall Road and Naumkeg Street.
This report also studies the feasibility of adding bituminous
pavement and/or curb and gutter to the existing gravel portions
of Bluff Avenue , between Naumkeg and Dakota Street, Naumkeg
Street between 1st Avenue and Bluff Avenue, and Prairie Street
between 1st Avenue and Bluff Avenue.
PROPOSED STREET DESIGN
All roadway construction shall be designed in accordance with the
City of Shakopee Standard Design Criteria and Standard
Specifications.
The portion of Bluff Avenue between Marschall Road and Naumkeg
Street consists of grading , curb and gutter , gravel base ,
bituminous paving and storm sewers. The remaining portions (i .e.
Bluff Avenue from Naumkeg and Marschall Road and Naumkeg , 1st
Avenue to Bluff Avenue) would consist of grading, bituminous
pavement and curb and gutters.
All streets would be 36 feet wide with B618 curb and gutter.
This would be compatible with the existing 36 foot wide Marshall
Road.
A small retaining wall may be needed along the parking lot behind
Benjamin' s Restaurant on the south side of Bluff Avenue just east
of Naumkeg.
According to the design criteria, sidewalks are required along
the north side of the street in all commercial zones. In this
case, since a portion of the north side is zoned residential , it
is proposed to install a 5 foot sidewalk along the south side of
the street, which is zoned commercial . In order to provide for
street drainage, storm sewer improvements may be required at some
of the intersections. The storm sewer costs are proposed to be
included in the overall street costs, since the storm sewers are
simply an extension of the street and necessary to drain the
street.
If Bluff Avenue east of Naumkeg Street is improved, the only
portion of Bluff Avenue that would still be a gravel road would
be that portion between Dakota Street and Naumkeg Street.
Therefore, this report recommends adding that portion of Bluff
Avenue to the project . In addition, this report recommends
improving Naumkeg Street and Prairie Street, between 1st Avenue
and Bluff Avenue, in order to bring all remaining streets up to
City Specifications.
2
RIORT OF WAI
Additional right-of-way is needed in order to construct Bluff
Avenue between Marschall Road and Naumkeg Street. The unplatted
land just north of Super America would need to be acquired for
street right-of-way.
The existing 60 foot wide right-of-way on Bluff Avenue at Naumkeg
Street does not line up with the existing 50 foot right-of-way at
Bluff Avenue in Halo' s 1st Addition. It is proposed to purchase
60 feet of right-of-way along Bluff Avenue extended east from
Naumkeg all the way to Halo' s 1st Addition. At the east end of
Bluff Avenue, an additional "taper" of right-of-way will need to
be acquired in order to match up with the existing right-of-way .
Please refer to the map in the appendix . The length of this
"taper" will be determined by the design of the horizontal curve
for the street.
It is estimated that approximately 25 ,000 square feet of right-
of-way is needed for this street. The estimated cost to acquire
this land is as follows:
Approximate Cost per Square Foot = $2 .50
Total Acquisition Costs = 25 ,000 x $2.50 = $62 ,500
Appraised Report = $ 1 .500
Total Acquisition Cost Estimate $64,000
COST ESTIMATE
A cost estimate has been prepared for this project which consists
of bituminous pavement, gravel base, curb & gutter, sidewalks,
retaining wall and storm sewers. A detailed cost estimate is in
the appendix .
The project cost estimate is as follows:
Total Construction Costs $160,600
Add 10% Contingency $ 16 ,000
Subtotal $176 ,600
Add 15% Engr./Legal Fees 26 ,500
Subtotal $203 , 100
Plus Right-of-Way Acquisition Costs $ 64 .000
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $267 ,100
3
ASSESSMENTS
The City of Shakopee Special Assessment Policy states that new
streets shall be assessed 1003 back to the abutting properties
(Section VIII) . It is proposed to assess all properties abutting
the subject streets using the front foot method. Because of the
different sections of work proposed , a separate assessment
procedure should be discussed for each.
For Bluff Avenue, between Marschall Road and Naumkeg Street, the
assessments will be 1003 of all project costs since this would be
considered new street construction. The assessment rate for this
portion would be approximately $121 .00 per foot, including land
acquisition costs. If theland acquisition costs are eliminated,
the assessment rate is around $67.00 per foot.
For Naumkeg Street, between 1st and Bluff Avenue, the assessment
would be 253 of the street costs since this would be considered
street reconstruction.
Since this is a north-south street and all lots abutting it are
corner lots, the corner lot adjustment for assessments will be
used . Basically, the corner lot adjustment policy states that
all lots in the block will pay for the north-south streets
equally. This report interprets that policy to mean that all
lots within an area 150 feet in each direction will be assessed
on a per lot basis for the north-south streets.
Using this policy, the assessment rate for this street is around
$760 per lot, which comes to around $12.70 per foot for a typical
60 foot wide lot.
For the remaining gravel streets, the assessments will be 1003 of
the project costs since the project involves constructing a new
street. For Bluff Avenue , between Naumkeg Street and Dakota
Street, all properties abutting this street would be assessed on
a per foot basis. The estimated assessment rate is $47 .27 per
foot.
For Prairie Street, which is a north-south street, all lots in
the block will be assessed for this work the same as discussed
above for Naumkeg Street. The assessment rate for this street is
$3 ,120 per lot or around $52.00 per foot for a typical 60 , wide
lot. Those lots adjacent to both Bluff Avenue and Naumkeg Street
( 1/2 block away in each direction) will receive both a front foot
assessment and an area assessment (per lot) .
A complete property identification map and proposed assessment
roll for each portion is found in the appendix.
4
CONCLU3IONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Proposed street improvements to this area would have a positive
impact on traffic flow patterns and to vehicular access to
property in the study area. Staff has expanded the project scope
to include paving the remainder of Bluff Avenue between Naumkeg
and Dakota Streets as well as paving any gravel cross streets in
this area.
— In 1981 , a feasibility report to City Council for this same area
recommended phasing the improvements. Subsequently, City water
and sanitary sewer were installed as a "first phase" of
improvement to this area. The street improvements would complete
the public improvements to the study area.
It is therefore the recommendation of this report to improve
Bluff Avenue, between Marschall Road and Dakota Street, Naumkeg
Street between 1st Avenue and Bluff Avenue and Prairie Street,
between 1st Avenue and Bluff Avenue to present City Standards.
5
PROJECT LOCATION
1 i
ALL- p�
L
1
�r
L
L CITY OF SHAKOPEE
L 6
; .
... ---------
CD _ -CD -
WW 4
> „ N
Q m
o _ -
LL
LL
LL
z �� '✓
-
i_
✓ �^.r 5
— F- -
< [[ MZ rj)
F j
-F-Ww wow JQ :• gElAil,
WZII¢¢ ?7? QQ
FJ m>m ym 0 J �'
Q�Zuj LL
mm MMZ
LU m
INCl)7 ,N(7
L f a
7
IS
� m
Z
WLU
r/� N
VJ W S
W
11
\ m _
LL
t J _ ✓ �
Ln sn
O�
iI m - is
1 m
■ I ��
W Oils ■■ IRS
■ .1 — �_�
W �-1�■� n N L_
i O CcLu
_To �■ m m ',� 1 O
o �
LU
—�■ ■�
O -
U) m -
W WEr
m M
I..r_ N ■ O
- II ■I 15 �.. J: �
co
m _
�1• N �'..,1�
O�v
77�M�CLNN
O CC
W
J
J W
Q U)
2
uLo
2 CC
O
LL C)
LL- LLJ
Jcn U)
!D IL
o O
— Y �
a a
0
3�yitltld
I
i
cD
co
10
r
_ W OC'all
X
W
77eHD'
I
Q
Llia • N
_ LL
LL Qv3aunvr
J co >
LL a
mO O `
Y a-
0 O
d _ I 3rorore
i
� v1pxva
1 T-773
1
J-0
�..� L-2
�- ' Otl06 alb H�5ybt4 -
7 �, - -
��
aoo
'Jv6 "eZC
Q 091193wVbUn5 ^
a t �
W
O\ C c
OQ N ..u....u..0
Q �4 e ^ .. _ N3xoliN .alnno_ n
LJ.I O C N ......... . —
QU t......................... .r..E.r/...�...ti ....1. .,.........` a
LL
LL
JJ Av ..........CC
W O O O
IL z Is
e
is
BLUFF AVENUE - MARSCHALL ROAD TO BAUMREG
COST ESTIMATE
UNIT
ITHM
U N ITV PRICE AMOONT
— Grading, 1 ,000 C.Y. $ 2.50 $ 2,500 .00
Subgrade Preparation
— Class V Gravel Base 870 TONS $ 6 .50 $ 5 ,600 .00
Bituminous Pavement 550 TONS $ 24 .00 $13 ,200 .00
— Curb and Gutter 1 ,200 L.F. $ 6 .00 $ 7 ,200 .00
Sidewalk 3 ,000 S.F. $ 1 .50 $ 4 ,500 .00
Driveways 800 S.F. $ 2 .50 $ 2,000 .00
Sod 1 ,300 S.F. $ 2.00 $ 2 ,600.00
Retaining Wall 240 S.F. $ 10.00 $ 2 ,400 .00
Storm Sewer
18" RCP 200 L.F. $ 32.00 $ 6 ,400 .00
12" RCP 60 L.F. $ 28.00 $ 1 ,700 .00
Manholes 2 EA. $ 11000 .00 $ 2 ,000 .00
Catch Basins 2 EA. $ 1 ,000 .00 $ 2 ,000 .00
18" Apron 1 EA. $ 500 .00 $ 500.00
Rock Excavating 200 C.Y. $ 50 .00 $10 .000.00
Total Construction Costs $62,600.00
Plus 10% Contingency 6 .300.00
Subtotal $68,900 .00
Plus 15% Engr./Legal Fees 10 .300 .00
Subtotal $79 ,200.00
Plus Right of Way Costs $64 .000 .00
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $143,200.00
13
ASSESSMENT RATE:
_ ALTERNATIVE N0. 1
Total Project Costs = $143 ,200 .00 (with right-of-way costs)
Total Frontage = 1 ,180 L.F .
Assessment Rate = $143 ,200/1180 L.F. = $121 .35 per foot
ALTERNATIVE N0. 2
Total Project Costs = $79 ,200 .00 (excluding right-of-way costs)
Total Frontage = 1 ,180 L.F .
Assessment Rate = $79 ,200/ 1180 L.F. _ $67 .12 per foot
14
_ Alternative 1
BLUFF AVENUE - MARSCHALL RD . TO NAUMKEG
i $121 35 Per Foot
I1 FRONT
I I PID ! PROPERTY OWNER I DESCRIPTION 1 FOOTAGE
{ I I--{ ASSESSMENT I
_ 127-004163-0 (William & Renelda Hauer (Lots -1-- 41 1706 1 I I
IBlk. 32 1
]Shakopee, MN 55379 1 203.00 { $24,634.62 I
]East Shakopee i 1
127-906008-0 ]William & Renelda Hauer I I
I 1706 Apgar 18.62 A in Govn I I I
1 1706 Apgar
MN 55379 ILot 4 Ex 3.13 Al 396.00 1 $48,055.71 1
1& Ex .26 A in I I I
ISect. 6,T115R221 I I
I j I
I I I
_ I I I 1
127-004160-0 {William & Renelda Hauer I I I 1
1 Apgar ]Lots 8 - 10 I 180.00 I $21 ,843.50 f
1706 A
PB ,Blk. 31 1 I I
IIShakopee, MN 55379 (East Shakopee { ! I
_ 1 I f
1 I I
I 1 I 1 { I
127-004159-0 (Country Properties Inc. (Lots 4 & 7 1 23.20 1 $2,815-38 1
1 1% Carlson Properties {Blk. 31
_ I 112755 Hwy. 55 (East Shakopee { I I
Mpls. , MN 55441 ] 1
I I I I I
127-906014-0 ]Country Properties Inc. 193.8' S 300' 1 j
I 1% Carlson Properties lin Govn. Lot 4 1 93.80 1 $11 ,382.89 1
I 112755 Hwy. 55 ISect. 6,T115R221
— i IMpls. , tR! 55441I 1
I I I I
I I I
127-906009-0 (Super America Stations Inc. 11.77 A in Govn I I I
_ 1 1% Tax Dept. ILot 4, 224.98' 1 284.03 1 $34,467.84 1
1 IP.O. Box 14000 Ix 300' , by I I I
I !Lexington, KY 40512 1284.03' , by I I I
_ 1 1305.4' Sect, 6 1 I I
]_I_ IT 115 R22 I I l
— I I I TOTALS I 1180.03 ;$143,200.00 11
15
Alternative 2
BLUFF AVENUE - MARSCHALL RD. TO NAUMKEG $67. 12 Per Foot
I I I---FR-0—KT 1
I PID ! PROPERTY OWNER
! DESCRIPTION I FOOTAGE I ASSESSMENT I
127404163-0 (William & Renelda Hauer
1706 Apgar 1Blk. 32 1 203.00 1 $13,624.73 1
!Shakopee, MN 55379 !East Shakopee 1 I I
127-906008-0 (William & Renelda Hauer1 i
18.62 A in Govn I I I
1 1706 Apgar !Lot 4 Ex 3.13 Al 396.00 1 $26,578.29 1
— 1 (Shakopee, MN 55379 1& Ex .26 A in ' '
I I (Sect. 6,T115R221 I I
— I I I I I I
I I I I I I
127-004160-0 (William & Renelda Hauer (Lots 8 - 10 1 180.00 1 $12,081 .04 1
— I 1706 Apgar lBlk. 31 I I I
I IShakopee, MN 55379 IEast Shakopee I ! !
I I
I { I I
1 ! I I I I
I I I 1
127-004159-0 (Country Properties Inc. (Lots 4 & 7 { 23.20 ! $1 ,557,11 I
— 1 1% Carlson Properties IBlk. 31 1 I I
1 112755 Hwy. 55 (East Shakopee I I I
— I IMpls. , MN 55441
I I I I
I I I I 1 I
I 1 I I
127-906014-0 !Country Properties Inc. 193.8' , S 300' I ! I
_ 1 1% Carlson Properties lin Govn. Lot 4 1 93.80 1 $6,295.57 1
1 112755 Hwy. 55 !Sect. 6,T115R221 I I
Mpls. , MN 55441
I I I I
— 127-906009-0 (Super America Stations Inc. 11 .77 A in Govn 1 1 !
1 1% Tax Dept. ILot 4, 224.98' I 284.03 1 $19,063.21 1
1 IP.O. Box 14000 '
— I (Lexington, KY 40512 I28403' ,bby I I I
1 1 1305.4' Sect. 6 1 1 I
IT 115 R22 I I I
I TOTALS I 1180.03 1 $79,200.00 1
16
NAUMEEC STREET — IST AVENUE TO BLUFF AVENUE
COST ESTIMATE
UNIT
ITEM QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT
Pavement Removal 1 ,000 S.Y. $ 1 .00 $ 1 ,000 .00
Common Excavation 400 C.Y. $ 4.00 $ 1 ,600.00
Subgrade Preparation 1 ,300 S.Y. $ 1 .00 $ 1 ,300.00
Class V Gravel Base 430 TONS $ 6 .50 $ 2 ,800 .00
Bituminous Pavement 270 TONS $ 24.00 $ 6 ,500 .00
Curb h Gutter 600 L.F. $ 6 .00 $ 3 ,600 .00
Sod 670 S.Y. $ 2 .00 $ 1 ,300 .00
Storm Sewer
Catch Basins 3 EA. $ 1 ,000 .00 $ 3 ,000 .00
12" RCP 100 L.F. $ 28.00 $ 2.800 .00
Total Construction Costs $23 ,900 .00
Plus 10% Contingency 2 .400 .00
Subtotal $26 ,300 .00
Plus 15% Engr ./Legal Fees 4 .000 .00
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $30,300.00
ASSESSMENT RATE:
Total Project Costs = $30 ,300 .00
25% x $30 ,300 .00 = $7 ,600 .00
Total Number of Lots = 10
Assessment Rate = $7 ,600/10 = $760 .00 Per Lot
Typical Lot (60 ' Nide) _ $760/60 Ft. _ $12.70 Per Foot
17
NAUMKEG STREET $760 Per Lot
I I I I # I I
_ I PID { PROPERTY OWNER i DESCRIPTION i LOTS I ASSESSMENT I
127-004119-0 (Bruce Wallace (Lots 6 to 10 1 I I
_ 1 111120 France Ave. S. IBlk. 24 I 2.50 1 $1 ,900.00 1
I (Bloomington, MN 55431 (East Shakopee I I I
I I ! ! I I
127-004118-0 (Dwayne & Antoinette Knigge !Lots 4 & 5 i
_ 1 111301 Hwy. 7 lBlk. 24 ! 2.00 1 $1 ,520.00 1
I (Hopkins, MN 55343 (East Shakopee I I I
I I 1 I I I
_ 127-004117-0 (Jeffrey Felt !Lot 3 & E 40' 1 1 1
I 14825 E. Lake Harriet Parkway lof 2, Blk. 24 1 0.50 1 $380.00 1
I IMpls. , MN 55409 (East Shakopee I I I
I I I I I I
_ 127-004160-0 (William & Renelda Hauer 18.62 A in Govn I i I
1 1706 Apgar ILot 4 Ex 3.13 Al 1 .25 I $950.00 1
I (Shakopee, MN 55379 1& Ex .26 A in { I 1
I I (Sect. 6,T115R221 I I
I I I I 1 I
127-004160-1 ISSBJ Management Co. ILot 1 , Blk. 31 1 I I
_ ! (Suite 125 IS 64.4' of 8, I 1 .25 1 $950.00 1
I 13285 N. Lexington 19&10 together ! I I
I ISt. Paul, MN 55126 Iwith Vacated I I I
! I (Alley Blk. 31 1 1 I
I ! (East Shakopee I ! I
I I 1 I I 1
1 I I I I I
— 127-004157-0 ISSBJ Management Co. ILot 1 & W 1/2 I I I
{ ISuite 125 iof 2 P/0 Alley I 1 .50 1 $1 ,140.00 ;
I 13285 N. Lexington {Blk. 31
ISt. Paul, MN 55126 {East Shakopee
! ! I
127-004158-0 ISSBJ Management Co. ILot 3 & E 1/2
i ISuite 125 iof 2&P/O Alley 1 1 .00 1 $760.00 I
I 13285 Lexington IBlk. 31 I I I
I ISt. Paul, MN 55126 ;East Shakopee
I TOTALS ! 10.00 1 $7,600.00 !
18
BLUFF AVENUE — NAUMKEGSTREET TO DAKOTA STREET
PRAIRIE STREET — IST AVENUE TO BLUFF AVENUE
COST ESTIMATE
UNIT
ITEM QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT
_ Class V Gravel Base 240 TONS $ 6 .50 $ 1 ,560.00
Bituminous Pavement 900 TONS $ 24.00 $21 ,600 .00
Curb 8 Gutter 1 ,880 L.F. $ 6 .00 $11 ,280 .00
Sod 2 ,000 S.Y. $ 2.00 $ 4 ,000 .00
4" Sidewalk 3 ,000 S.F. $ 1 .50 $ 4,500 .00
_ 6" Driveways 1 ,600 S.F. $ 2.50 $ 4 ,000 .00
Storm Sewer
18" PCP 350 L.F. $ 32.00 $11 ,200 .00
12" RCP 120 L.F. $ 28.00 $ 3 ,360 .00
Manholes 2 EA. $ 1 ,000 .00 $ 2 ,000 .00
_ Catch Basins 5 EA. $ 1 ,000 .00 $ 5 ,000 .00
18" Apron 1 EA. $ 500 .00 $ 500 .00
Rock Excavation 100 C.Y. $ 50.00 $ 5 .000 .00
Total Construction Costs $74 ,000 .00
_ Plus 10% Contingency 7 .400 .00
Subtotal $81 ,400 .00
Plus 15% Engr./Legal Fees 12 .200 .00
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $93,600.00
19
ASSESSMENT RATE - BLUFF AVENUE (2/3 OF THE PROJECT LENGTH)
Project Costs for Bluff Avenue = 2/3 x $93 ,600 = $62 ,400
Total Frontage - 1320 L.F.
Cost Per Front Foot = $62,400/ 1320 L.F. _ $47 .27 Per Foot
ASSESSMENT RATE - PRAIRIE STREET (1/3 OF PROJECT LENGTH)
Project Costs = 1/3 x $93 ,600 = $31 ,200
Total Number of Lots = 10
Cost Per Lot = 31 ,200/10 = $3 ,120 Per Lot
20
BLUFF AVENUE - NAUMKEG TO DAKOTA $47 . 27 Per L . F .
FRONT I I
1 PID i PROPERTY OWNER 1 DESCRIPTION I FOOTAGE i ASSESSMENT I
{ I I I I I
_ 127-004110-0 1James Stocker :Lot 1 , Elk. 17 1 110.00 1 $5,200.00 1
1831 Bluff {and Dakota St. I 1 I
I (Shakopee, MJ 55379 (Vacated between{ I I
I I (Lot 1 , Blk. 17 1 I
— I ! 1& Lot 6, Blk. Al I I
I i lEast Shakopee
— 127-004111-0 (Robert & Colleen Schilz {Lot 2,3 & W 2011 120.00 1 $5,672.72 1
1 1931 E. Bluff St. !of 4, Blk. 17 1 I I
1 {Shakopee, MN 55379 (East Shakopee i I I
I I I ! I I
— 127-004112-0 (Wallace Laureen & Wife !Lots 5 & 4 Ex 1 80.00 1 $3,781 .82 1
I 12355 Marschall Road 1W 20' of 4, 1 1 1
I lShakopee, M1 55379 lBlk. 17 1 1 I
— I I {East Shakopee 1 I !
I I I I I I
127-004113-0 !Lester Koehnen !Lots 6-17 & Ad,jl 110.00 1 $5,200.00 1
_ ! 112270 N. Shannon Dr. 160x110'vacated 1 1
! IShakopee, MN 55379 !Prairie St. I I I
I ! (East Shakopee I I I
I I I I I I
— 127-004115-0 !Janet Lowe (Lots 1 & 2, 1 100.00 1 $4,727.27 1
110344 Morris Road 1Blk. 23 1 1 1
I !Bloanington, MN 55437 !East Shakopee I { I
127-004115-1 (Ronald Scherer & Alice !Lots 5 & 6 i 100.00 1 $4,727.27 1
I 11037 Bluff Ave. lBlk. 23 1 1 1
_ I IShakopee, MN 55379 (East Shakopee I I I
I I I I 1 1
127-004115-2 (Robert & Lois Stark {Lots 3 & 4 1 100.00 1 $4,727.27 1
I 117342 Vergus Ave. lBlk. 23 1 1 1
— 1 !Jordan, M1 55352 (East Shakopee I I I
I I I I I !
127-004109-0 {Roy Collin !Lot 9, Blk. 17 1 120.00 1 $5,672.72 1
— 1 1914 Bluff Street (Lot 10, Blk. 161 1 1
1 IShakopee, MJ 55379 land P/0 Vacated{ I I
I I (Alley I I I
I I (East Shakopee I I I
— I I I I 1 1
127-004108-0 (Ada & Lydia Rohlfs !Lots 4 to 8 I 180.00 1 $8,509.09 1
I 1931 E. 1st Ave. lBlk. 16 & P/0 I ! I
— i !Shakopee, MN 55379 (Vacated Alley I I I
I I {East Shakopee I ! I
I 1 I I I I
127-004119-0 !Bruce Wallace lLots 6 to 10 1 300.00 1 $14,181 .81 1
1 111120 France Ave. S. lBlk. 24 1 ! I
I (Bloomington, Mi 55431 (East Shakopee I I I
— I I I TOTALS 1 1320.00 1 $62,400.00 1
I I I I I 1
21
/ / v-
PRAIRIE STREET $3 , 120 Per Lot
1 I I 1 I I
— I PID i PROPERTY OWNER I DESCRIPTION I LOTS I ASSESSMENT I
127-004108-0 !Ada & Lydia Rohlfs I1.ot3 4 to 8
! 1931 E. 1st Ave. IBlk. 16 & P/O I 4.50 1 $14,040.00 1
I ]Shakopee, MN 55379 (Vacated Alley I I 1
I I (East Shakopee I I I
I I I I I
127-004119-0 (Bruce Wallace ILots 6 to 10 1 I I
I 111120 France Ave. S. IBlk. 24 1 2.50 1 $7,800.00 1
! IBloanington, MN 55431 (East Shakopee I ! I
I I I I I
127-004116-0 !Della Lenzen ]Lot 1 & W 20' 1 I i
I 1440 W. 2nd St. Iof 2, Blk. 24 ! 1 .30 1 $4,056.00 1
! IWaconia, MN 55387 (East Shakopee I I I
— I I I I I !
127-004117-0 (Jeffrey Felt ILot 3 & E 40' 1 1 I
I 14825 E. Lake Harriet Parkway lof 2, Blk. 24 1 1 .20 1 $3,744.00 1
— ! IMpls. , MN 55409 (East Shakopee I I I
I I I I I I
127-004107-0 (Alphonse Notermann & Wife !Lot 3, Blk. 16 1 0.50 1 $1 ,560.00 1
_ I 1919 E. First I& P/0 Vacated I I I
i (Shakopee, MN 55379 !Alley I I I
I ! ]East Shakopee I I I
! I I I I I
— I I I TOTALS 1 10.00 ! $31 ,200.00 1
I I I I I I
22
q
MEMO TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Dave Hutton, City Engineer� ,...a/
SUBJECT: Sidewalk Inspection, Repair and Replacement Policy
DATE: August 7, 1989
INTRODUCTION A BACKGROUND:
On April 18 , 1989 the City Council of Shakopee adopted the
proposed Sidewalk Repair and Replacement Policy and directed the
City Attorney to prepare the appropriate revisions to the City
Code. The City Attorney has now prepared the appropriate
ordinace adopting the Sidewalk Inspection, Repair and Replacement
Policy by enacting a new section in the City Code, Section 7 .16 .
Ordinance No. 270 is attached for Council consideration and
adoption.
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Adopt Ordinance No. 270.
2. Do not adopt Ordinance No. 270.
3 . Direct the City Attorney to revise Ordinance No. 270.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 .
ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt Ordinance No. 270 , Which Amends Chapter 7 of the Shakopee
City Code by Enacting a New Section 7 . 16 Entitled Sidewalk
Inspection, Repair and Replacement Policy.
DH/pmp
ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE P 270
Fourth Series
An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota Amending Chapter 7
Entitled "Street and Sidewalks Generally' By Enacting a New Section 7.16
Entitled "Sidewalk Inspection, Repair and Replacement Policy" And By
Adopting By Reference Shakopee City Code chapter 1 and Section 7.99
Which Among Other Things Contain Penalty Provisions.
TRE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
SECTION 7.16: Sidewalk Inspection, Repair and Replacement Policy
Subd. 1: Inventory of defective sidewalks
A. The Engineering Department shall develop an annual inspection program
to inventory defective sidewalks. The City shall be divided into zones and each
year a different zone shall be inspected.
B. In addition to zonal repairs, a list of sidewalk complaints
shall be maintained and those deficiencies shall also be repaired, whether in
the zone or outside of the zone.
C. The City Engineer shall determine which sidewalks are defective and
in need of repair or replacement. In general, any defect in the sidewalk will
justify repairs but the following criteria will be used as guidelines determining
defective sidewalks:
1. Sidwalks that pond water or ice
2. Sidewalks that are cracked and heaved greater than 1/2 inch.
3. Spelled sidewalks - sidewalks that have developed numerous holes
and pockets due to the aggregate chipping off.
4, Cracked sidewalks.
5, Sidewalks that have developed other hazards such as tree roots,
water valves., etc.
D. The brick pavers downtown,will be included in the sidewalk inspection
and repair program.
E. All defective sidewalks within each zone or received- - by complaints
shall be repaired or replaced during the current year in which listed.
F. Inspection of any sidewalk repairs or replacements shall conform
to the requirements of Section 7.06 of the Shakopee Code.
Subd 2. permit Required
No repair or replacement by the owner or occupant of the premises
shall be made on or to any sidewalk without first obtaining a permit to work
in the public right-of-way provided in Section 7.07 for the road.
Subd 3. Funding for Sidewalk Repairs
A. If the sidewalk is less that five years old
1. If installed under City Contract, it shall be replaced at
no expense to the property owner;
2. If installed by the property owner, it shall be replaced at
his expense;
B. If the sidwalk is older than five years
1. Shall be ,jointly funded, 50% by the City and 50% by
property owner.
C. If the sidewalk is damaged by the property owner or occupant of
the property, the property owner shall pay 100% of the replacement
cost, regardless of the age of the sidewalk or who installed it.
Subd 4: Violations a Misdemeanor
Any person who is in violation of any Subdivision or paragraph of this
section, or fails to do an act that is required hereunder, shall upon conviction
be guilty of a misdemeanor. . .
r% .
Subd 5: When in Force and Effect
After the adoption and attestation of tjids ordinance and on publication
in the official newspaper of the City of Shakopee, it shall be in full force
and effect from and after the date following such publication.
Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota this _ day of 1989.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
Attest:
City Clerk
Prepared and approved as to form
this 19th
day of
June, 1989
P�itAA+R/11G�
Ju s A.Coller, II, City Attorney
p
MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Ord. No. 271
DATE: August 11, 1989
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
The attached ordinance was prepared by Mr. Coller pursuant
to Council direction. It amends the city code be eliminating the
minimum six month license fee for on-sale intoxicating liquor
licenses. On-sale licenses fees will be prorated the same as
other licenses, on a monthly basis.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Offer Resolution No. 271, An Ordinance of the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending Shakopee City Code Chapter 5
Entitled "Liquor, Beer and Wine Licensing" by Repealing Section
5. 02, Subd 4 (B) and by Enacting A New Section 5.02 Subd 4 (B) and
by Adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code Chapter 1 and Section
5.99, Which Among Other Things Contain Penaly Provisions, and
moved its adoption.
jc
ORDINANCE NO. 271
Fourth Series
An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending Shakopee City
Code Chapter 5 entitled "Liquor, Beer and Wine Licensing" by Repealing
Section 5.02, Subd 4(B) and by Enacting a New Section 5.02 Subd 4 (B)
and by Adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code Chapter 1 and Section
5.99, Which Among Other Things Contain Penalty Provisions
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECTION 1• Repeal
Section 5.02 Subd 4 (B) is hereby repealed.
SECTION TI: Enacting a new section 5.02 -Sub-d 4- (B)
- -- . . If an application is approved, the City Administrator shall forthwith
issue a license pursuant thereto in the form prescribed by the City or the proper
agency of the State of Minnesota as the case may be. All licenses shall be on a
fiscal year basis, July 1 to June 30. For licenses issued and which are to
become effective other than on the first day of the licensed year, July 1, the
fee to be paid with the application shall be prorated on the basis of 1/12th for
each calendar month or part thereof remaining in the then current Licensed year.
Licenses shall be valid only at one location and the premises therein liceneed.
SECTION III: Violations a Misdemeanor
Any person who is in violation of any subdivision or paragraph of this section
or fails to do am act that is required hereunder shall upon conviction be guilty
of a misdemeanor.
SECTION IV: When in Force and Effect
After the adoption and attestation of this ordinance and on publication in the
official newspaper of the City of Shakopee, it shall be in force and effect from
and after the date following such publication, and be retroactive to July 1, 1988 .
Passed in session of the City Council of the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1989
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Prepared and approved as to form this
31st day _of July, 1989.//
City Attorney
Ile
_ 11,
MEMO TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Ord. No. 272
DATE: August 11, 1989
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
The attached Ordinance No. 272 amends Ordinance No. 266
which was adopted by Council on June 20, 1989. Ordinance No. 266
failed to repeal old Section 12.12 before adopting a new Section
12.12. Consequently, we currently have two sets of regulations
addressing erosion control and the older set of regulations
should be repealed.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Offer Ordinance No. 272, An Ordinance of the City of
Shakopee, Amending Shakopee Code by Specifically Repealing
Section 12.12 of Chapter 12 Entitled "Environmental Protection"
and by Specifically Repealing the following Portions of Chapter
11 entitled "Land Use Regulations (Zoning) " Repealing Subd 13 Sec
11.03; all of Section 11.60 and A and B of Subd 10 of Section
11.35, and move its adoption.
jc
ORDINANCE NO. 272
Fourth Series
An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending Shakopee
Code by Specifically Repealing Section 12.12 of Chapter 12 Entitled
"Environmental Protection" and by Specifically Repealing the following
Portions of Chapter 11 entitled "Land Use Regulations(Zoning)"
Repealing Subd 13 Sec 11.03; all of Section 11.60 and A and B of
Subd 10 of Section 11.35
'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECTION I: Purpose
The "repealer" clause of Ordinance 266, Fourth Series, was inadvertently
omitted from Ordinance 266 and the purpose of this Ordinance is to amend Ordinance
266 only by adding the omitted "repealer?
SECTION II: Repeal_
This Ordinance formally repeals
A. All of Section 12.12 of Chapter 12.
B. All of the following sections or provisions of Chapter 11, to-wit:
1. Subd 13 Sec 11.03
2. All of Section 11.60
3. A and B of Subd 10 Sec 11.35
SECTION III: When in force and effect
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect after the adoption, attestation
and publication of this ordinance once in the official newspaper of the City of
Shakopee and it shall be in full force and effect on and after the date following
such publication.
Passed in session of the City Council of the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of 1989.
ATTEST: Mayor
City Clerk
Preparedd approved as to form this 2nd day of August, 1989.
City Attorney
;av
TO: Dennis R. Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: 1990 Tax Levy Resolution No. 3081 Reconsideration
DATE: August 14, 1989
Introduction and Background
The City has received notice of the levy limit under the existing tax laws.
The limit is $68,008 higher than estimated due to a larger population growth
factor.
Therefore, Council has the option of leaving the proposed maximum tax levy
at $1,867,938 or reconsidering Resolution No. 3081 and setting the proposed
maximum tax levy at $1,935,946.
It should also be noted that staff had estimated an increase in local
government aid of $12,794 and that the initial notification from the state is no
increase.
Alternatives
1. Status Quo - no action.
2. Raise the proposed maximum tax levy by $68,008.
Recommendation
Alternative number 2 because it does not commit Council to anything but
does give Council more latitude in setting the levy later this year.
Actio
1. Move to reconsider Resolution No. 3081.
2. Move to amend Resolution No. 3081 by changing the General Fund levy from
$1,848,639 to $1,916,647; Total General Fund from $1,867,938 to $1,935,946; and
Total levy from $1,867,938 to $1,935,946.
3. Move to approve Resolution No. 3081 as amended.
RESOLUTION NO 3081
A RESOLUTION SETTING PROPOSED MAXIMUM 1989 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 1990
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, COUNTY OF SCOTT,
MINNESOTA, that the following sums of money be levied as the proposed maximum
tax levy in accordance with existing law for the current year, collectible in
1990, upon the taxable property in the City of Shakopee, for the following
purposes:
GENERAL FUND LEVY $1,916,647
SPECIAL LEVIES:
Library 14,299
Public Pension Funds 5.000
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1,935,946
DEBT SERVICE SPECIAL LEVY
-0-
TOTAL LEVY 81.935.946
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a
certified copy to this resolution to the County Auditor of Scott County,
Minnesota.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this day of , 1989.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1989.
City Attorney
�Z r
Aj yl: :. Jf the .iuw:!owr - _ ...bv..:_:.Om�nt, ... .a•2 wnrv! .empty
_Gl:cu l is ln$tai:@,i "! .>omm^ fV'. L!, prr__r. tror:.,_at Avo. to 3ra.
'=h_a was It :...ty ._est to e11�, the .aeotrl : _:.m_:: ..., .e nut
unc�_r•]rcunemy wa:c
aG: CtJnufal La OR 5um:ner v:_.10 atop on .. _ .wrLn .:1oe J..
Third Ave. waich is now torn up. The con-!ulta have to Du brought
out to a Lolnt away from the Gtreet pavement if we are to be
able to use them without tearing up the new street .
This would be the time to extenc those conduit acrosa
Third Ave. and out to the side of t-he street awav from the
biac:Ctou.
♦ would recummend that t.ais oe Cone unc•_r sem•a
3rranyement as tn,a earlier parr of the concu ` t, ifore
Third Avenue is paved.
cstlmate cost is 33,u,i:i.OU
w LA vw�
,uaiA. cu.a w-no U�� ',JAA, C . sP� c
iz b
TO: Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
FROM: JOhr. S. DuBois, Actinc Chief of Police
SUBJ: Approval of individuals to fill two existing vacancies as police
officer for the Police Department.
DATE: August 15, 1989
BACKGROUND
Council approved the hiring of one police officer on May 1, 1989.
Due to a lack of qualified applicants at that time the decision was made
to delay the hiring process until August of 1989.
Council, in the interim, had approved the hiring of a 2nd patrol
officer to fill the vacancy created by Officer Fleck's resignation.
INTRODUCTION
On August 14, 1989, the Police Civil Service Commission held oral
examinations for Police Officer to fill existing vacancies in the Police
Department.
RECOMMENDATION
The commission recommends that Raymond Allen Erlandsen and
Thomas Claire Crocker be hired with the conditions that they pass a physical
examination, complete a psychological evaluation, and meet backc_round
investigation standards, prior to an offer of employment.
BRIEF BACKGROUND
Raymond Allen Erlandsen, 3131 Maple Drive, Prior Lake, MN DOB/02-12-47
A.A. Degree, 16 yrs. Law Enforcement experience, Post Certified.
Thomas Claire Crocker, 713 22nd Street South, St. Cloud, MN DOB/05-07-67
No prior police experience. Recent graduate of Alexandria Technical Institute.
Eligible to be Post certified.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Authorize the hiring of Raymond A. Erlandsen at the top patrol rate of $2,819.39
per month (with no credit toward longevity) and Thomas C. Crocker at the starting rate
of $2,114.54 to fill police officer vacancies, contingent upon their passing a physical
examination, a phychological evaluation and meeting background investigation standards.
Julius A. COLLEB.R
Juuoa . LER ATTonNEY AT LAw ala s-iz+.
use-�a.o211 WEST FIRST ..E"U
SH ROPHE.MINNESOTA
653Z9
AUG1 11999
Dolores Lebens, Mayor of the City of Shakopee �1
Dennis Kraft, City Administrator
Shakopee City Council Members
From: Julius A. Collar, II, City Attorney for the City of Shakopee
Date: August 9, 1989
Re: Dogs and other animals
As a result of concern over vicious dogs and particularly pit bulls as a
result of recent popularity of such animals the Council requested the
drawing of an Ordinance covering the issue. This has been somewhat comp-
licated by Chapter 37 entitled "Animal Control-Dangerous Dogs" as adopted
by Minnesota State Legislature and approved by Govenor Perpich on April 17,
1989, which in Subdivion 8 thereof provides that no city or county may
adopt an ordinance regulating a dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs
based solely on the specific breed of a dog. Ordinances inconsistent with
this provision are void. This proposed ordinance has been drawn to cover
pit bulls without so specifically stating or defining and it is the new
law that is the reason why the term "pit bulls" is not included in the
proposed ordinance.
ACTION RECOMMENDED:
Offer Ordinance No. 273, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
Amending Shakopee City Code Chapter 10 Entitled "Public Protection, Crime
and Offenses" By Repealing Subd 1 and Subd 8 Sec. 10.21 and by Enacting
New Subd 1 and a New Subd 8 and by Adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code
Chapter 1 and Section 10.99 which among other things contain penalty previsions,
and move its adoption.
ORDINANCE N0.273
Fourth Series
An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee,Minnesota, Amending Shakopee City
Code Chapter 10 Entitled "Public Protection, Crime and Offenses" By
Repealing Subd 1 and Subd 8 SeclD.21 and by Enacting New Subd 1 and
a New Subd 8 and by Adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code Chapter
1 and Section 10.99 which among other things contain penalty provisions.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
ARTICLE I: Definitions
The following definition section is added to Section 10.21
Subd 1 — Definitions
The following terms as used in this section shall have the meanings herein
stated.
A. The term "owner" means any person, firm, corporation, organization,
unit or department possessing, harboring, keeping, having an interest in, or having
care or custody or control of a dog, cat or domestic animal.
B. The term "at large" means outside of the premises of the owner and not
under restraint. A leash shall be a restraint oraline, belt, cord or chain, not
more than 10 feet in length for leading or restraining a domestic animal securely
fastened around the neck or collar of said animal, except in a case of a potentially
dangerous or vicious animal the leash shall be no longer than 4 feet in length.
C. The term "potentially dangerous or vicious animal" means
1. Any animal with a propensity, tendency or disposition to attack,
cause injury or otherwise endanger the safety of human beings or other domestic
animals as evidenced by its habitual or repeated chasing, snapping, barking or
howling.
2. Any such domestic animal which attacks a human being or other
domestic animal without provocation.
3. Any animal owned or harbored primarily or in part for the purpose
of dog fighting.
Subd 2-Running at Large Prohibited
It is unlawful for any dog, cat or other domestic animal to run at
large and any vicious animal, outside of its kennel or pen must in addition to
being on a 4 foot leash, shall be muzzled by a muzzling device sufficient to
prevent the dog from biting persons or other animals. except when shown either
in a sanctioned American Kennel or Show or upon prior approval of the Health
Department.
ARTICLE II: The following new Subd 8 shall be added to Sec 10.21:
Subd 8 Obligation to Prevent Nuisances
It shall be the obligation and responsibility of the owner as herein
defined of any animal in the City whether permanently or temporarily therein
to prevent such animal from committing any act which constitutes a nuisance
and it shall be considered a nuisance for any animal to habitually or frequently
bark or cry at night, to frequent school grounds, parks or public beaches, to
chase vehicles or individuals, to molest or annoy any person, if such person is
not on the property of the owner or custodian of such animal, or to molest,
defile or destroy any property, public or private. Failure on the part of the
owner to prevent his animal from committing an act or nuisance shall be subject
to penalties herein provided. Each occurrence is a separate offense.
It is also unlawful for any owner of any domestic animal not to immediately
remove any feces left by such animal on any public or private property and to
dispose of such feces in a sanitary manner and not to have in such owner's
possession a device or equipment for picking up and removal of such animal feces.
The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to a paved or traveled portion of
a public street or road or to rural undeveloped areas of the City nor to guide
dogs accompanying a blind person or to a dog used by police or in rescue operations.
ARTICLE III: Repeal
This Ordinance repeals the following portions of Chapter 10, to-wit:
Subd 1 and Subd 8 of Sec 10.21
ARTICLE IV: Violation
Every person violating Section, provision or subdivision hereof when he
performs an act hereby prohibited or declared unlawful or failed to do an act
which failure is hereby prohibited or declared unlawful and upon conviction thereof
shall be guilty of a petty misdemeanor.
ARTICLE V: When in Force and effect
After the adoption and attestation hereof one publication in the official
newspaper which shall be in force and effect the day after the date of such
publication .
Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this day of 1989.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Prepared and approved as to form this
9th of August 1989.
City Atto