HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/02/1988 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items
DATE: January 28, 1988
1. Krass and Monroe attorney's fee for the Scott County Lumber
Company gravel pit CUP lawsuit:
a. Expenses for the initial lawsuit: Legal $15,565. 00;
Expenses $3,026.80; Total $16,891.80
D' 1591
b. Expenses for the appeal: Legal $2,690. 60; Expenses
$252.23; Total $2,942.73
C. Estimate for filing Supreme Court appeal: $1, 000. 00
d. Estimate for Supreme Court hearing if accepted:
$2,000-$3,000
e. I have checked with Capesius Agency, our insurance
carrier, and they indicated that our insurance company
will cover our attorney's fees and any of their
attorney's fees if they are awarded by the court.
2. We had a question from former Mayor Reinke regarding the
belated snow removal on County Roads 16 and 83 during last
week's snow storm. I checked with Scott County Engineer
Brad Larson and he assured me the County had not changed
their snow plow route priorities. The problem was: (1) wet
heavy snow being initially packed down by vehicles during
the rush hour, -(2) blowing and drifting snow that recovered
roadways and (3) a new vehicle operator in the Shakopee
district who replaced the former driver who is recovering
from back problems.
3. The Minnesota River Valley Chapter of the Minnesota Deer
Hunters Association has applied for a raffle license for
their March 26, 1988 banquet. They are in conformance with
the requirements of the City Code.
4. The Knights of Columbus Council #1685 has applied for
renewal of their gambling license. They meet the
requirements of the City Code.
5. Mr. Hanover, of Richard's in Shakopee, has decided not to
renew his cigarette license for 1988. This is a result of
the City Code requirement that no licenses be issued if an
applicant is delinquent on paying taxes, assessments,
utilities or any other financial claims of the City. Mr.
Hanover has not paid the second one-half of the 1987 payable
taxes. He is also delinquent on his Shakopee Public
Utilities bill.
6. Congressman Bill Frenzel's staff will be having a '-staff
listening hour" in Shakopee on Tuesday, February 9, 1988
from 7:00 to 8:30 p.m. at the Scott County Courthouse, Room
318. Any Councilmember or citizen interested in talking to
Mr. Frenzel's staff first hand is invited to do so at this
time.
7. Attached is a memo from Barry Stock regarding the Community
Development Commission newsletter.
8. Attached is a memo from Barry Stock providing you with an
update on the Home Energy Check-Up Program.
9. Attached is a letter that LeRoy Houser received after he
notified the State about the vandalism at the old
Correctional Facility.
10. Attached is a memo from LeRoy Houser regarding an abandoned
residence on east 5th Avenue.
11. Attached is a letter John DeLacey sent to Robert Vierling
regarding a medical bill of his he forwarded to the City.
As John states in the letter we are handling this like all
such claims.
12. Attached is a copy of the Scott County Board's nominations
to the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District. I believe
they will be making a decision on Tuesday, February 2nd.
13 . Attached is the summary page from the fourth quarter
newsletter put out by the Minnesota Police Recruitment
System. Shakopee uses this service for recruiting and
hiring new officers.
14. Attached is a letter from Al Frechette, Environmental Health
Manager from Scott County, to David D. Vieau regarding the
old historic landfill dumps on the 535 acres formerly owned
by the Hanson Ranch. This item is being monitored by the
County and not the City. We are simply being kept appraised
of the County's actions.
15. Attached is a notice from Rep. Arlan Stangeland's office
regarding Minnesota's removal from the Department of
Energy's possible secondary nuclear waste site.
16. Attached is the monthly calendar for the month of February.
17. Attached is the "Business Update from City Hall" which will
go out with the February Chamber Newsletter. Also attached
is a Notice regarding removal of ice and snow from public
sidewalks which will go out with the Newsletter.
18. Attached is the agenda for the February 1, 1988 meeting of
the Cable Communication Advisory Commission.
19. Attached is the agenda for the February 3, 1988 meeting of
the Community Development Commission.
20. Attached are the agendas for the February 4, 1988 meetings
of the Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment and
Appeals.
21. Attached are the minutes of the April 2, 1987 meeting of the
Cable Communication Advisory Commission.
22. Attached are the minutes of the January 6, 1988 meeting of
the Community Development Commission.
23. Attached are the minutes of the January 7, 1988 meetings of
the Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment and Appeals.
24. Attached are the minutes of the January 20, 1988 meeting of
the Shakopee Community Recreation Board.
25. Attached are the minutes of the December 3, 1987 and January
7, 1988 meetings of the Shakopee Coalition.
26. Attached are the minutes of the January 14, 1988 meeting of
the Energy and Transportation Committee.
JKA/jms
7
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Administrative Assistant
RE: Community Development Commission Newsletter
(Informational)
DATE: January 29, 1988
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
Last week, a preliminary draft of the Community Development
Commission Newsletter was distributed to the Council for their
information and review. The primary focus of the newsletter was
on the mechanics of tax increment financing. I received several
suggestions from Council members regarding the newsletter. First
and foremost, was the fact that the tax increment story was too
long. Tax increment financing is such a complicated financing
tool I have decided to take an abbreviated approach to explaining
this issue. Rather than explaining the detailed mechanics of how
tax increment works, I am proposing that we simply state six of
the common misconceptions about tax increment financing and offer
additional information to those persons that request it. Shown
in attachment 41 is the second draft of the Community Development
Commission Newsletter that will be distributed in February. if
you have any questions or comments regarding the abbreviated
approach taken to explain tax increment financing or any other
story in the newsletter please call me prior to February 5, 1988.
II
PROPERTY TAX FACTS
Stonebrooke Golf The median property tax on It should be noted that five of
Course PUD an $80,000 house in the Twin the top six communities with
Cities in 1987 was $828, ac- the highest property taxes are
In January the Shakopee City cording to the annual property located in Scott County. Re- .
�,,;;,1p{y�rtrg-6ern+r+ksswn approv- tax survey conducted by the cent County cash flow pro-
ed the final plat for Citizens League. However, blems and the County's posi-
This plat
is t First Addition. property tax rates vary greatly tion atop the metro property
This plat is the first phase of a across the Twin Cities. tax survey listing have promp-
residential development ted the Scott County Board to
located on an 18 hole golf Below are the 10 communities confront this problem. On
course north of O'Dowd Lake. with the highest property December 22, 1987 the Scott
The first phase of the develop- taxes and the 10 communities County Board directed staff
ment includes 25 single fami- with the lowest property taxes to conduct an in-depth study
ly and 5 twin home lots.
Residential construction is re an $80,000 house) in the of the County's financial and con-
expected to begin in late region. Included in the surrey planning
its budget and levy
spring. Eventually, Laurent were the 95 metro tiom- planning practices.
Builders plan on developing over 2,50 with populations
an additional 52 single family over 2,500.
and 7 twin home lots.The golf Top 10 Bottom 10
course is expected to begin
operation in the summer of 1 Jordan: $1,175 1. Eagan: $558
1989. 2. Shakopee: $1,160 2. Mendota Heights: $559
1987 Annual Building - 3. St. Paul: $1,129 3. West St. Paul: $561
Activity Report 4. Prior Lake: $1,118 4. Spring Lake
5. Savage: $1,066 Township: $570 _
Single Family Dwellings - 62 6, Belle Plaine: $1,065 5. Forest Lake
Multiple Family Dwellings - 8 7. Little Canada: $1,054 Township: $580
(129 units) 8. Farmington: $1,035 6. Lake Elmo: $584
Commercial Bldgs. (New) - 5 9. Falcon Heights: $1,003 7. Grant Township: $611
Industrial Bldgs. (New) - 2 10. Maplewood: $989 8. Edina: $640 -
9. Ham Lake: $674
Annual Planning 10. New Scandia
Activity Report Township: $687
Prel. Plats (Residential) - 6
# of single family lots - 595
# of multiple family lots/
units - 46192
Final Plats (Residential) - 3
# of single family lots - 206 !-
# of multiple family lots/ LW
-
units - 7/14
--- .. We want you to learn to take control of your
home energy costs. Shakopee's Home Energy -- - -
Check-Up Program can help save you money We Welcome Feedback From
` CONS M.\KC ION NO and stay warm this coming winter, the winter
cgNsckvAi'um Souk u.N<. . .. y tag Our Readers
.after that, and the winter aper that. ..
If you would like to offer com-
Plus. = .It's FREE to ments, questions, or sugges-
tions, please feel free to call
qualified 1 q PP or write to:
Call 445-3650 for application info. Shakopee Community
Development Dept.
r i
129 East First Avenue- «---
sponsored
' sp °°r
City O' o p eu - Shako
pe
e, MN 55379
Shakopee Public Wues l-U Number Of 445.{650
Minnegascb Chic,k-UPAvubbk _
`'-
Free Curbside Collection
The Second Saturday of Each Month �SNA0EE ARE4 :RANSr7
Newspaper (Newsprint Only) Now Available
Glass (Green, Brown and Clear) Saturday
Aluminum and Steel Beverage Cans _ Dial-A-Ride
(Pop & Beer Cans Only) Service
. Place your materials on the cuiclum Estate 8:30 a.m. -
w Bundle your newsprint with twine or store it in grocery Daps or carbeoam boxes. Glass and beverage 9 a.m.-2 p.m.
cans should be stored separately in grocery begs or cardboaM boxes. Call Now: 445.9040
• Pick-up provided by the tolusurig organizations: Shakopee Boy scouts, snakopee cub stoma and Dial-A-Ride Service Available
Shakopee Area Catholic scribble. _
Mon:Fri., 6 a.m.-9 m.,
. The vluntrRecycling ganuenoite would like
oto luno u Shakopee Municipal services Buildingyour h Germans top
The volunteer oron ortiona would like to encourage your cooperation in delivering your regdeblas to Sat., 9 a.m.-2 p.m.
the drop all site on our monthly recvclinb tlay.
WCOMMUNJTY_--M ,' COMMISSION ■ ■ � ,
-mN E W S L E. T T E R
Mill
— — _
VOLUME II ISSUE 1 FEBRUARY 1988
TIF Misconceptions She Shakopee DEVELOPMENT INSIGHT
-
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) 'Community Develop- Minnesota Valley Mall Project
is a financing technique utiliz- ment Commission The Essex Corporation of
ed by cities to encourage I would like to share Omaha, Nebraska is in the
economic development and/ with you six of the , of
common miprocesspurchasing the
sconce
or redevelopment. Accord- p- Minnesota Valley Mall. The
ing to the State Auditor's Of. tions that the Essex Corporation intends to
fice, approximately thirty-two general public extensively remodel the mall.
states have statutes that often has about the
authorize the use of TIF. use of Tax Incre- The developer has asked the
Since its inception in Min. ment Financing. If City to consider the possible
nesota, over 200 cities have you would like a
more complete £act location of either an ice
utilized TIF. - p skating facility or possibly a
sheet or have any
: questions on the community center in part of
the mall.
mechanics of TIF
please feel free to
! call the Shakopee The Shakopee City Council
Community Develop- has appointed a committee to
ment Department at evaluate the need for these
445-3650. facilities and cost/benefits, if
Six Misconceptions About any, of locating recreation
facilities within the mall. The
Tax Increment Financing Committee plans to meet with
1. Property owners in de- 4. The creation of a tax in- various recreation interests in
velopments who have re- crement project deprives the near future.A City Council
ceived tax increment fi- cities, counties, or decision on this project is ex-
nancing assistance school districts of prop- petted in mid February, 1988.
don't pay taxes. In fact, erty taxes that they are
they continue to pay all already receiving or
property taxes. would have received. No. Meadows tat Addition
7 2.The property taxes on a The reason the new tax Meritor Development Co,'
tax increment project base is even available is poration is in the process of
are deferred indefinitely. because the TIF subsidy developing 163 acres located
Each district's taxes are brought the business to East of Spencer Street (Coun-
deferred for a specific Shakopee. ty Road #79) and South of
maximum number of 5. People can't comment 11th Avenue (formerly
years (8 or 25) and most - on the creation of a new Roberts Gravel Pit). The final
districts are closed long tax increment project. plat for the first phase of the
before the maximum Wrong. A finding must development containing 51
- time allowed by law. be made by City Council single family lots has .been
3. The City takes funds after an advertised -- i approved by the City Council -
from its city budget to; public hearing that the Lots should be available in
�I initiate tax incrementdevelopment project 1988.
projects. Actually, all would not have occurred -' County Village Apartments
costs including initial without tax increment
administratroncostsaro�- assistance. Further.-I Minnetonka Woods Develop-
billed to and paid by the =. ment is currently workingon I
district more, the School District' the construction of- County
and County must be In• :I Village . Apartments. This
formed and have 30 days three story' apartment com- ---
to comment on the pro-7 lex will- posed project. -P provide 113 rental
6-That creation of a TIF units. The development is -
® located adjacent to County
District only benefits the
developer. Shakopee I Road School.south of the Junior
. taxpayers have bene• High udtConstruction is
fited greatly because scheduled a to be completbe
-- --- .more than 50% of the - and rental units will be -
TIF expenditures are for available this summer. -
public projects benefit- - The development of the pro-
- -
ing the City not the de. perty is planned to take 4 to 5
veloper. Furthermore, - years to complete. When -
when a tax increment complete the project will have
project is closed out, all a total of 340 lots and up to
local taxing jurisdictions - 144 apartment or town house..
receive the benefit of the units. -
larger tax base.
g
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Administrative Assistant
RE: Home Energy Check-Up Program Status (Non Agenda
Informational)
DATE: January 13, 1988
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
Last year the City of Shakopee received a grant from the
Department of Energy and Economic Development to initiate a Home
Energy Check-Up Program. The City of Shakopee also received
funds from Minnegasco and Shakopee Public Utilities to assist in
the implementation of this program.
At the present time, our Assistant City Building Inspector
has completed the Home Energy Auditors Course and is now
certified to conduct our home energy audits. We currently have
approximately 15 people on a waiting list who are eligible to
receive free home energy check-ups. We plan on performing the
majority of our home energy check-ups during the months of
January, February and March.
Our Home Energy Check-Up Program is available to all
Shakopee residents who are either Minnegasco or Shakopee Public
Utilities heating customers. Funding is available to complete
approximately 150 audits in 1988 and another 150 next year.
I would request that you take the time to inform your
neighbors about this valuable program. Anyone interested in j
participating in the program should contact Barry Stock at 445-
3650.
MinnesotaMinnesota Correctional Facility
Department of
Corrections Shakopee
January 15, 1988
Mr. Leroy Houser, Bldg. Official
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379-1376
Dear Mr. Houser:
This is in response to your 12/28/87 letter regarding securing the old facility
across the street.
We are presently in contact with state officials to determine what can be done
to reduce the vandalism across the street. We will contact you as soon as
we receive some answers. Please be assured that we are not ignoring your
request.
Very truly your
D. ac line Fleming
ritenSupedent
DJF/lmb
CC: Jim Zellmer, Project Director, DOC
BOX 7 O SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55579 O 612-937.3440
w eauwawwnuaar mora
MEMO TO: John Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: LeRoy Houser, Building Official
RE: 436 E. 5th Avenue
DATE: January 29, 1988
We are in the process of boarding up an abandoned residence
located at 436 E. 5th Avenue.
The property is being "trashed" out by neighborhood kids and
constitutes a public nuisance under Sec. 401 of the Housing Code.
We will assess the cost of boarding the property up against the
property taxes.
In addition, we will start condemnation proceedings in April.
LH:cah
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
INCORPORATED 1870
129 EAST FIRST AVENUE,SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 553791376 (612)4453650 ..
1
January 28, 1988
Mr. Robert Vierling
221 E. 4th
Shakopee, MN 55379
RE: Injury Claim on 4th Avenue Reconstruction
Project No. 1986-3
Dear Mr. Vierling:
I have contacted the contractor' s (S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. )
insurance agent in regards to your injury claim on the above
referenced project. I talked with a Ms. Shelly Riley of CNA
Insurance and she stated that they have denied any liability on
the contractor' s part for your injury. As a point of information
for you, it is the City' s standard policy whenever a construction
project is performed to enter into a contract that holds the
contractor as sole responsible party for public safety and
protection of property . The contract further requires the
contractor to carry the necessary insurance in the event there is
a claim against the project. In addition to the contractor and
any sub-contractors that may work on the project , the City of
Shakopee is listed as being insured by the respective policies.
This type of contract is not only the City of Shakopee's standard
policy, but is common throughout the construction industry .
Bob, as a suggestion, I see your only recourse at this time is to
take legal action against the contractor. For your use, the
contractor's name and address is S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. , P.O.
Box 212, Shakopee, MN 55379•
If there are any questions, or we can be of any further help do
not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
- ohn Engineering Technician
Technician
JHD/pmp
The Heart of Progress Valley
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNI"EMPLOYER
SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA l
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION apen°eI
teg.nte°i,mda . January 26, 1988 eriainVw,deewtmenc
neaii>;rty: None Board of Ctnmissioners
ITEM: (ServlcelSublect) we6enN.:
Chainmen Casey
Tntergoverrunental/Citizen Appointment eerimrtee time:
10 minutes
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Appoint Manager to the Lover Minnesota River Watershed District Board of
Managers to fill Mr. Russell Heltne's Unexpired Term to 3/22/90.
BACKGROUND:
Mr. Heltne resigned in December, 1987, due to a move to Florida.
A letter requesting nominations for the position Was sent on Qpcember 9,
1987, to the City of Shakopee, the City of Savage and the Towr4iips of
Jackson and Louisville, pursuant to Minnesota Statute.
The following nominations have been submitted:Jim
DeloreKessMMorCity of Shakopee �qN2
ke City of Shakopee
Ray Siebenaler City of Shakopee 07TYO 8
Linda Lehman City of Savage c�
Darrell Jahn Louisville Township
weooning Eocumenm X auwhecl —none
Eig4lmelMe: aianlyb; recommendee foe Consent Agenda:
Jackson/Louisville Twp. X
1 Cities of 91obspiie/Savage
Admi ' tr ecommentic
1 &
spneNraldete: / ,� �Q/
amriba' mei ruc[ :(BD.Action Certification)
appgved u ragaaetee � �
Board 4niea r esota River Watershed
Action tei,bd rota Water Resources
O1hef File: MN River Watershed District
RBA No DSD SC #MOO 5183
I3
MINNESOTA POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM
813 TWELVE OAKS CENTER • WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391
(15500 WAYZATA BLVD.) • PHONE (612) 475-1771
FOURTH QUARTER NEWSLETTER Jq V2 --
C/ �196p
The purpose of this Newsletter is to summarize for the Board of-Dior actors /fO-FF
major activities of the MPRS for the period between October 1 and
December 31, 1987.
Placements
During the fourth quarter thirteen placements were made through the MPRS.
This brought to fifty-seven the total number of placements made through the
System during 1987, making it a very successful year. Shown below is a
summary of placements made through the MPRS and its predecessor, the -
SPRS, since formation of the SPRS:
1980 - 49 placements 1984 - 53 placements
1981 - 41 placements 1985 - 42 placements
1982 - 38 placements 1986 - 63 placements
1983 - 37 placements - 1987 - 57 placements -
Miscellaneous
Enclosed is the unaudited Financial Report for the quarter ended December
31, 1987. For the year the System's Operating Fund revenues exceeded
expenditures by $4,330.14. As $4,100 was expended for the revision in the
evaluation process, overall year-end retained earnings were slightly higher
than beginning retained earnings.
All MFRS members recently were mailed statements for their 1988
membership dues, together with a form upon which to report all peace
officers hired by the community during 1987. Please remember that the
audit of placements must be completed and returned to the MPRS in order
for a community to remain a member of the System.
The MPRS offices will be moving during the week of January 25th, and we
apologize in advance for any inconvenience which this may cause. Our new
address will be Suite 343, 13911 Ridgedale Drive, Minnetonka, MN 55343.
We also will have a new telephone number, which will be (612) 542-9390. -
SCOTT couNTr
/y
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Evs '•"`
COURT HOUSE A102
SHAKOPEE, MN.55379-1393 (612)445-7750. Ezt. 77 ..JAN 2 i iSi2
January 25, 1988
David D. Vieau
NOVA Environmental Services, Inc.
Suite 420 Hazeltine Gates
1107 Hazeltine Blvd.
Chaska, MN 55318
Dear Mr. Vieau:
This letter is in response to the Preliminary Landfill
Investigation conducted by NOVA environmental services, Inc. for
Scott Builders on the 535 acre property west of County Road 89
formerly the Hanson Dude Ranch.
After reviewing the report we feel that their are a number
of areas which should receive further attention. First,
indicators like nitrates (NO3) , chlorides, and Chemical Oxygen
Demand (COD) should be tested and included in the lab report.
Second, more wells should be tested before drawing any
conclusions. -Third, background levels should be determined from
wells established upgradient from the landfill sites.
It is possible that monitoring well #2 is too far from the
landfill to show any signs of leachate contamination. If we use
the test results from monitoring well #2 as a basis for a
background reading, then the results from the other two wells
become more suspect. It is very difficult to determine what
parameters should be tested for around an old dump without
knowing what was buried there. A review of the ownership and
history of this dump should have been included in the report.
One parameter that was tested, specific conductance, (which is
generally a good indicator that something different is
occurring) indicated some evidence of contamination from two of
the dumps. However, no reference was made to this in the
discussion or recommendations. In the absence of a more
thorough examination we do not believe that the conclusions
proposed can be safely made. As stated on page 7 under
Discussion. . . "Based on this data, there appears to be a low
risk of the landfill sites detrimentally impacting on
down-gradient drinking water wells in the area. " We are
uncomfortable proposing such a conclusion on so little data.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
' David D Vieau /
NOVA Environmental Services, Inc.
January 25, 1988
Page Two
We recommend that more testing be conducted with at least three
monitoring wells adjacent and downgradient to each of the three dump
sites along with at least two upgradient background wells. In the
absence of better data, it is most prudent to assume that
downgradient wells may still be impacted, but that no serious organic
contamination was detected in the monitoring wells constructed and
sampled. The dump areas must be avoided when constructing buildings
due to the likelihood of methane gas contamination and differential
subsidence.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this report. Please
contact Bill Lauer at 937-6177 if you have any questions about our
comments, and before any development plans are finalized for this
property.
Sincerely,
1'2& �
Allen Frechette
Environmental Health Manager
cc: Mr. Zack Johnson, Scott Bldrs. Inc.
John Anderson, City of Shakopee
Jennifer Volkman, MPCA
AJF/bl
ARAN STANGELAND OFFICES. 15
TN gI.,NINNC..i. 2245 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BNBgNG
wn5
ONOFFICEDO WSID
W0 I11E-2186
ODE
Sw BRE Congress of the United *tater NBo '°:";BD
PoWPT ONO 11 <OD CENTER AVENOBE
...VVVM R1q 23IRU1 O
bouse of Representatibes � f'° AFRORALWE ..;
s20 N.,,BE
Washington, DO: 2om '�A'V2 11988 ID;zI" 240
_.,•,-y OF SNAK�pFE
December 23 , 1987
Dear Friend:
Minnesota is finally off the Department of Energy's hit—list
for a possible secondary nuclear waste site — once and for
AIL - - _--------- -
House and Senate Conferees worked out a compromise which
eliminated the second nuclear waste repository and directs
the selection process toward placing the primary repository
in the State of Nevada.
I believe that the enactment of this legislation, called the
Johnston-McClure amendment, was the best and quickest way to
resolve this issue. The Department of Energy is directed to
characterize Yucca Mountain, Nevada and cease all work at
Hanford, Washington and Deaf Smith, Texas. DOE must
discontinue all research, except research for the Nevada site
and subseabed disposal of nuclear waste. This includes
discontinuing all research and search for a second
repository.
Since the beginning of the 100th Congress, I have been at the
forefront of legislative action and efforts to stop the
Department of Energy's crystalline-bedrock nuclear waste
program.
The Johnston-McClure Amendment was similar to legislation
that I originally introduced several months ago in the house
-----af--representatives.----1n-addition,-Y -spearheaded the- effort in
the House aimed at informing the House Conferees of the vast
support in that body for this type of agreement.
The nuclear waste issue is not one to be taken lightly. We
share a common concern, and I shall continue to pursue
responsive public policy for our environment and our state.
With best wishes, I am
Si rely,
Arlan Stangeland
Member of Congress
February 1988
SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SRT
1 2 3 4 5 6
Public City CDC Planning Newly
Utilities Council 5:00 p.m. Commission Elected
4:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. 7:30 p.m. Officials
Cable Conference
Commission
7:30 p.m.
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Downtown Energy &
Committee Transp.
7:30 a.m. 7:00 p.m.
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
CITY HALL City
CLOSED Council
7:00 p.m.
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Board & City
Commission Council/
New Member Dept. Heads
Orientation 7:00 p.m.
7:30 (tentative)
28 29
January March
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 2 1 2 3 4 5
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 12
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
24 25 26 27 26 29 30 27 28 29 30 31
31
none 01/14/1988
17
BUSINESS UPDATE FROM CITY HAIL.
Vol. 2 No. 2
Dear Chamber Member: February 1, 1988
AIP'@IISTR QN
The Star Tribune ran an excellent series 1/24 - 1/27 analyzing combined
State and local government spending in Minnesota. It analyzes the plicated
web of State local Aid programs for cities, schools and canities while ccimparing
spending in Minnesota with other states. The table below was in the Sunday
edition.
More the-money goes _
11412.8 billion spent by Minnesota'a slate and local
governments in 1986 were changed into a$100 bill.
bard s bow much would go to each function. $5.50 Mamlenlarca -
$4.70 Govt.aomiestration'
$3.80 Parks
$7.30 Interest O0 debt $3.60 Safety
$&00 Community heahh 52.00 Housing
$6.50 Highm aduwlion $1.906ewers
:.
$10.20 moads $2.70 Courts
$15.005ooalservkes - 52.40 On all Wer
e4.40Publlcschods
i .. 1
11111 �TM � � 1
Uri
Wy�i2
IK: s .1 2x V L"{ f/
isr
n t RA 1' >za
t:. l�(i
I #
h t
y3, ice. e
-
of
i„. y
4.
1V V
-4N
� �'
we are currently following a "Tax Reform Package” put together by
Minneapolis, St. Paul and the larger cities in greater Minunesota. Analysis to
date indicates a major shift of local goverment aids (city, school, county) to
Hennepin, Ramsey and St. Louis Counties for a "Welfare Pay-Out" and to larger
outstate cities. Currently the Metro area Provides the State with 648 of the
taxes it collects but the State only returns 46% to the Metro area "The Tax
Reform Paclaael1 acrfravates this imbalance!
B=ING
Preliminary plans have been submitted for a 62 unit motel with expansion
area on the property east of Valleyfair.
Cm
Council has designated the Shakopee Valley News as the City's official
newspaper for 1988. Council has approves the issuance of some 40 plus cigarette
licenses for 1988.
The City is currently looking for a recording secretary to take minutes at
the Council and Planning Commission meetings. Interested parties should contact
the personnel department.
CO MIIIIQITY DEVELOPMENT
The Energy and Transportation C=ission is going to hold a public hearing
at 7:30 p.m. . February 11. 1988, in the Shakopee City Hall to consider a Dial-A-
Ride fare increase.
The Shakopee Community Development Commission will be publishing a quarterly
development-oriented newsletter which will be targeted to the Metropolitan Area
Development unity. This newsletter will be replacing the ICC Day Event which
has been held for the past three years.
The Ops m ty Development Department staff will be completing the 1988
Shakopee Star City Work Program by March 31st, any suggestions for this program
are welcomed.
CaMi0NIT1 RECRFApTON -
Families that like to play together are invited to participate in the
Shakopee Co®uhity Recreation "Family Fun Nicdht-1 activities scheduled at the
Shakopee Jr. H.S. building Friday even_r=S March 18 25 and April 8 and 15
Hours are from 7:30 to 9:30 p.m. Activities include swimming, basketball
shooting, table games etc. The fee is $2.00/person, and at least one parent must
acompany each family attending.
ENGINEERING
Easement acquisition for the Upper Valley Drainage Proiect is now in
process. Record drawings for our 1987 proieCLS are being made. Final plans for
Phase I Part U of the Downton Streetscape Prosect should be ready by February
15th.
FINANCE/PE ^R.iOTINEI,
We have received 16 applications for City Engineer. They are being screened
by John Anderson, City Administrator; Fred Moore, Public Works Director in
Plymouth and Chuck Weirhelbaum of Mn/DOT. We hope to have a candidate selected
and on board before the busy spring and summer sessions come.
FIRE DEPAR'A1FT]T
Twelve members have completed the let Responder Refresher Medical Course.
We have put into service a new 1988 3,000 gallon tank truck.
POIICE DEPARTMENT -
The Shakopee police Department has joined five other law enforcement
agencies in a Narcotics Task Force whose goal is to interdict drug trafficking.
The City Council authorized $5.000 to be used to obtain $73,000 in federal grant
funding for the proiect.
� 7
W A R N I N G
THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY CODE WILL
BE ENFORCED WITHOUT INDIVIDUALIZED NOTICE BEGINNING
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 1988.
SEC. 7.04. . ICE AND SNOW ON PUBLIC SIDEWALKS.
Subd. 1. Ice and Snow a Nuisance. All snow and ice
remaining upon public sidewalks is hereby declared to constitute
a public nuisance and shall be abated by the owner or tenant of
the abutting private property within twelve (12) hours after such
snow or ice has ceased to be deposited.
Subd. 2. City to Remove Snow and Ice. The City may
cause to be removed from all public sidewalks , beginning twelve
(12) hours after snow or ice has ceased to fall, all snow and ice
which may be discovered thereon, and it shall keep a record of
the cost of such removal and the private property adjacent to
which such accumulations were found and removed.
Subd. 3. Cost of Removal to be Assessed. The City Ad-
ministrator shall, upon direction of the Council, and on receipt
of the information provided for in the preceding Subdivision, ex-
tend the cost of such removal of snow or ice as a special assess-
ment against the lots or parcels of ground abutting on walks
which were cleared, and such special. assessments shall at the
-
time of certifying taxes to the County Auditor be certified for
-collection as other special assessments are certified and col-
lected.
Subd. 6. Placing Snow or Ice in Public Street or on Oth-
er City Property. It is a misdemeanor for any person, not acting
under a specific contract with the City, to remove snow from pri-
vate property or alleys and place the same on a public street in
such quantity, or in such manner , as to cause a hazard to travel,
_ without adequate arrangements for the immediate removal thereof ;
and it is also a misdemeanor for any person not acting under a con-
tract with the City to dump snow on other City property.
ig
TENTATIVE AGENDA
Shakopee Cable Communications Advisory Commission
City Hall Council Chambers
REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 1, 1988
1. Roll Call at 7:30 P.M.
2. Approval of Minutes of April 2, 1987
3. Action: 1987 Annual Report
4. Action: Public Access Studio Contract
5. Action: Cable Company - Request to Eliminate Universal
Service
6. Informational Items
A. Public Access Annual Report
B.
C.
7. Other Business
A. Next Meeting ?
B.
8. Adjourn
Barry Stock
Administrative Assistant
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
/ 9
Note Meeting Time: 5:00 P.M.
TENTATIVE AGENDA
Community Development Commission
City Hall Council Chambers
February 3, 1988
Chrmn. Keane Presiding
1. Call to order at 5: 00 P.M.
2. Approval of the minutes - January 6, 1988
3. School District Update - Virgil Mears
4. One Year Work Plan
5. 1988 CDC Open House
6. Business Person Breakfast - Survey Results
7. Economic Development Update:
a. Valley Mall Project
b.
C.
d.
8. Informational Items:
a. Citizens League Property Tax Survey
b. Developers Newsletter (Verbal)
C.
9. Other Business
a. Next Meeting - Wednesday, March 2, 1988 - 5:00 PM
b.
10. Adjourn
Barry A. Stock
Administrative Assistant
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Please call Barry or Toni at 445-3650
if you cannot make the meeting.
/r.
TENTATIVE AGENDA
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
Regular Session Shakopee, MN February 4, 1988
Chairwoman VanMaldeghem Presiding
1. Roll Call at 7: 30 P.M.
2. Approval of Agenda
3 . Election of Officers
4 . Passing of the Gavel
5. Approval of January 7, 1988 Meeting Minutes.
6. 7: 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING• To consider a variance to
allow a 6' front yard setback to alter an existing sign,
instead of the required 10' setback.
Applicant: Scandi Company
Action: Variance Resolution #519
7. Other Business
8 . Adjourn
Douglas K. Wise
City Planner
NOTE TO THE B.O.A A MEMBERS:
1. If you have any questions or need additional information on
any of the above items, please call Doug Wise on the Monday
or Tuesday prior to the meeting.
2. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the
Planning Department prior to the meeting.
�D
TENTATIVE AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular Session Shakopee, MN February 4, 1988
Chairwoman VanMaldeghem Presiding
1. Roll Call at 7:30 P.M.
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Election of Officers
4. Passing of the Gavel
5. Approval of January 7, 1987 Meeting Minutes
6. 7:40 P.M. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the
preliminary plat approval of Meadowbrook Run, upon the
property located South of C.R. 16 and East of Pike Lake
Trail.
Applicant: Darrel Gonyea
Action: Recommendation to City Council
7. 7:50 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider a Conditional Use
Permit to allow a home occupation to operate a gutter
installation business upon the property located at 8450
Eagle Creek Blvd.
Applicant: Steven Lee Schmidt
Action: Conditional Use Permit Resolution #517
8. 8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider a Conditional Use
Permit to move-in a single family dwelling unit upon the
property located at 2220 Foothill Trail.
Applicant: Michael Connie Schmid
Action: Conditional Use Permit Resolution #518
9. Final Plat Approval - Horizon Heights 4th Addition
Action: Recommendation to City Council
10. Comprehensive Plan - Updating
Action: Recommendation to City Council
11. Discussion
a.
b.
12. Other Business
13. Adjourn
Douglas Wise
City Planner
NOTE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
1. If you have any questions or need additional information on
any of the above items, please call Doug Wise on the Monday
or Tuesday prior to the meeting.
2. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please call the
Planning Department prior to the meeting.
�l
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
ADVISORY COMMISSION
Regular Session Shakopee, Minnesota
April 2, 1987
Chairman Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. with
Commissioners Moonen and Davis present. Commissioner Abeln was
absent. Commissioner Harrison arrived late. Barry Stock,
Administrative Assistant; Bob Ziegler, Shakopee Public Access
corporation President; Bill Lepley, Public Access Studio Manager;
Ron Ward and Jack Trimb0, Shakopee School District were also
present.
Moonen/Davis moved to approve the minutes of the September 29,
1986 meeting as kept. Motion carried unanimously.
School Reouest for Funding
Mr. Stock reported that the Shakopee School District has
requested the release of funds from the Public Access
Corporation's characte;_generator account and I-net account. Mr.
---stock state t at during the last set Of cable franchise
modifications the cable company agreed to provide $4,000 to the
Shakopee Public Access Corporation for the City's eventual
purchase of character generator equipment. The cable company
also agreed to provide $4,000 to the Access Corporation for the
eventual purchase of I-net equipment that had not been provided
by the cable company.
The School
the charactergenerator fundstrict is toallow requesting
lthat
them2,995 be released from
generator for the School District. AdditionallyPurchase
the schoolcharacter
requesting the release of between $3,185 and $3,385 from the
institutional network fund which would allow them to activate the
institutional network between the school and the Shakopee Womens
Correctional Facility. The I-net funds would be used to purchase
a modulator and a switcher.
Davis/Moonen moved to approve the school's request for funds and
requested the Shakopee Community Access Corporation to release
these funds in an amount not to exceed $6,380. Discussion
ensued.
Commissioner Harrison arrived at 7:45 p.m.
Commissioner Harrison questioned whether or not the School
District had looked into an Apple II computer system which could
also be used as a character generator. Commissioner Harrison
stated that since we only have $4,000 in the character generator
fund he wanted to make sure that the dollars were spent wisely.
Ron Ward then stated that the School District has been checking
with local vendors for quite some time and that they have looked
into a computer -characters generator system and also the Amiga _
system that is presently located at the Public Access Studio.
While the computer systems are fine products, he felt that based
on his conversations with other school systems and cable
companies who are operating an I-net, he would like the Cable
Commission to consider the approval of the funds for the
acquisition of the microvision-max by Microtech. He went on to
state that this character generator had more than enough storage
space for the schools needs.
Chairman Anderson questioned whether or not the character
generator proposed by the School District had the capability of
being expanded. Commissioner Moonen responded by stating that
the character generator being proposed could be expanded at a
future date if the school so desired. Commissioner Anderson then
questioned who would be inputting data into the machine and where
it would be located. Jack Trimbo stated that the character
generator would be located at Sweeney Elementary and that he
would be the primary person responsible for inputting data into
the character generator. He also stated that one of the main
reasons that this character generator is being considered is that
it is very user friendly. The School District is conEidenL_tha-t -
they can train three or four people relatively easy on this piece
of equipment. Commissioner Anderson then questioned what the
primary use of the character generator would be. Mr. Ward stated
that the character generator would allow the School District to
put up their announcements on the educational channel. The
character generator could also be used to superimpose titling
over video. Discussion ensued.
Commissioner Davis called the question. Motion carried with
Commissioner Moonen abstaining.
1986 Annual Report
Davis/Harrison moved to approve the 1986 annual report.
New Frontier Contract Extension
Mr. Stock stated that the public access studio agreement with New
Frontier and the Access Corporation expires on April 15, 1987.
Mr. Stock stated that he is proposing several changes in the
contract language including a 3% increase in the level of
compensation provided to the contractor, the elimination of
language that required the contractor to provide a performance
bond in the amount of $5,000 and replacement language
establishing a security fund or escrow account in the amount of
The
security fund inAtheseventrofrdefaultwbylda this
the contractor.ve access tpStaff
was also recommending that a sentence be added to the contract
which identified certain holidays that the studio would be
closed. He stated that it was up to the discretion of the Access
Corporation whether or not it would - be appropriate to close the
studio on these holidays. Finally, staff recommended that a
sentence be added to the contract which required the contractor
to submit an annual report -tothe City of Shakopee and the Access
Corporation. --.. .
�A
Bill Lepley requested the Cable Commission to consider a greater
increase in the level of compensation. He stated that during
1986 actual studio operating hours were 1,988 and that in the
original proposal of New Frontier, they proposed 1,694 hours of
service. Mr. Lepley stated that he would like to see a 12-1/28
increase in the level of compensation.
Mr. Stock stated that the amount of money which the City can
contribute to the funding of the Access Corporation is set by the
amount of franchise fees that are returned to the City of
Shakopee by the cable company. In 1987, staff projects that
franchise fees will total $18,000. Assuming staff's projection
is accurate, this would leave approximately $1,700 for the City
of Shakopee to staff the Cable Commission. Mr. Stock then stated
that if the franchise fees exceed staff's projections, it may be
Possible in 1988, (if the contract is renewed at that time) to
increase the level of compensation above the City of Shakopee pay
increase. Mr. Stock then stated that if New Frontier would like
an additional increase in the level of compensation that they
would have to approach the Access Corporation and that the Access
Corporation would somehow have to find money to pay for any
increase. Staff suggested that there may be other alternatives
that would satisfy the concerns of New Frontier. Staff suggested
that the Access Corporation may want to consider changing the
studio hours or decreasing the percentage that New Frontier is
paying to the Access Corporation on their gross revenues.
Commission Harrison stated that he felt New Frontier Productions
had done a good job in their first year. He went on to state
that while the contractor may have not met every condition
established in the service contract agreement, that they did do
other things above what was called for in the contract.
Commissioner Anderson questioned the status of the promotional
video tape that was to be produced by the contract. Mr. Lepley
stated that he expected the total promotional tape to be complete
by July 1, 1987. Commissioner Anderson then questioned whether
or not the Access Corporation was receiving all the reports that
are to be provided. Access Corporation Chairman Bob Ziegler
stated that the contractor was providing the necessary reports.
Chairman Ziegler then questioned why a listing of the programs to
be aired have not appeared in the local newspaper. Mr. Lepley
responded by stating that he had approached the local newspaper
editor and that they were unwilling to give free space for this
type of announcement. commissioner Davis suggested that the
contractor should speak directly with the publisher Stan.
Rolfsrud. Chairman Anderson pointed out to the contractor that
the payment schedule was based on an escalating scale and
wondered how the contractor felt about this. Mr. Lepley stated
that he would rather have monthly payments and that they all be
equal. He went on to state that the payment schedule in 1986
made it very difficult for New Frontier to budget. Staff then
stated that the franchise fees are paid to the City of Shakopee
on a quarterly basis and that was the rationale for the payment
schedule. Commissioner Harrison questioned whether - or not the
Citycould have a payment schedule which provided • for six equal
payments. Mr. Stock stated that it would be possible.
Discussion ensued.
Harrison/Davis then moved to approve the Shakopee Public Access
Studio Service Contract Agreement with New Frontier Productions
as amended and recommended the Access Corporation enter into a
contract with New Frontier Productions for an additional year of
service. Motion carried unanimously.
Informational Items
Mr. Lepley briefly went through the 1986 annual report for the
Public Access Studio. Chairman Anderson questioned how much
Private business New Frontier conducted in 1987. Mr. Lepley
stated that the Access Corporation's share of New Frontier's
gross revenues amounted to approximately $500 in 1987. Mr.
Lepley went on to state that New Frontier's primary task in 1986
was to get the Public Access Studio operating. In 1987 New
Frontier will more actively seek private business contracts.
The Commission then reviewed the cable television monthly reports
and noted that subscriber counts have seemed to level off.
The regional channel 6 issue was then discussed by staff. Mr.
Stock stated that currently the cable company is broadcasting
leased access on regional channel 6. He stated that he had
discussed this issue with the cable manager and that they
understood that should the City eventually desire to use regional
channel 6, they would have to relocate leased access. Discussion
ensued. Consensus was. to allow leased access on channel 6 until
such time that it was needed for regional access or upon the
request of the City for its removal.
Mr. Steve Stolen, Cable Manager, then gave a brief update on
channels 8 and 23. He then discussed the marketing efforts being
planned by United in the next year. Mr. Stolen also stated that
the cable company has recently conducted they first pay-per-view
event and that it was very successful. Over 260 subscribers in
Shakopee and Chaska subscribed to Wrestlemania III. Mr. Stolen
stated that the Hagler/Leonard fight was also being scheduled for
pay-per-view next week. Mr. Stolen reported that he expected
weekly pay-per-view movies to be offered this fall. Finally, Mr.
Stolen reported that they had recently conducted an audit of the
system which went very well. Mr. Stolen stated that in his
opinion the cable system has improved dramatically in the last
year. Several of the committee members concurred with Mr.
Stolen's remarks and stated that they were very satisfied and
happy with United's performance since Mr. Stolen's arrival.
Moonen/Harrison moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:30 p.m. Motion
carried unanimously.
Barry A. Stock
Recording Secretary
SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS SHAKOPEE, MN JANUARY 6, 1988
Members Present: Don Koopmann, Terry Joos, Jane Dubois, Jim
Plekkenpohl and Al Furrie. Members Absent: Bud Berens, ex
officio member. Staff present: Barry Stock, Administrative
Assistant and Dennis Kraft, Community Development Director.
Acting. Chairman Furrie called the meeting to order at 5:05
-P.m.
Joos/Koopmann moved to approve the minutes of December 9, 1987
meeeting. Motion carried unanimously.
The Community Development Director gave an update on the
_ Minnesota--Va328y- Mall project. Essex Corporation is looking
into purchasing the Minnesota Valley Mall development from the
current owners. They are Proposing a renovation project to
become a .- strip shopping center with K-Mart expanding. The
developer is .looking into a community center and/or ice
skating facility within the center. A committee is being
formed to meet with various groups in the community to discuss
what type of activity might fit into this plan.
The current Mall is 48% leased. Any type of facility would
act as an activity generator for the shopping center. The
developer would p rovide the land and the City would be
responsible for operating the ice arena or community facility.
The developer believes that this would increase the number of
people coming to the Mall and would be good for business.
This is not in a tax increment district presently. Has the
City a need for a year-around operating recreational facility
at this time? If so, where does it belong and how should it
be funded. Tax Increment Financing is only one of many ways
to pay for this. Could this be looked at a year-around park?
Member Tim Keane arrived at 5: 15 p.m.
A review and update of Hutchinson Technology, a high
technology manufacturing facility for computer components was
given. This grpup would definitely bring blue-chip industry
into the Community. They are looking for a 50, 000 square foot
with the ability to expand to 1/4 million square feet within 2
years. They would employ 300 on a full-time basis. Shakopee
is still being considered by this company.
The January CDC Newsletter next issue will come out later this
month and will feature the mechanics of Tax Increment
Financing. A draft of the text was reviewed by the members
and discussed. Discussion was held realting to the importance
of stressing the benefits to the individual taxpayer as well
as the community-wide benefits of TIF. There will be an
addition which refers questions on TIF to Barry Stock,
Administrative Assisant.
Community Development Commission
January 6 , 1988
Page 2
Also added will be a section giving statistical data such as
how many building permits issued - commercial, residential ,
multi-family, etc. to keep the newsletter educational in
nature.
1988 Promotional Events were discussed. One possibility would
be an Open House at Canterbury similar to last year 's event.
If such an event is planned , subcommittees must be developed
to plan and carry out such event. A map of the proposed new
highway projects should be made available to prospective
developers.
Discussion was held regarding a period update or community
profile. An example of high-quality newsletter was shown.
Possible uses of letters of endorsement in such a newsletter
was brought up. Consideration was given to readership input
through the use of business reply cards or similar tools.
A discussion of tax rates and how they are divided by County,
School District and City tax structures was held. A
possibility of having a forum to hear questions regarding
property taxes was suggested.
School district taxes are high and members were of the opinion
that service has decreased while rates have increased.
Members of this body will be researching property tax issues
to identify issues of concern to the public and gain more
knowledge about this issue as a whole. County-wide increases
in property taxes were reviewed.
The Business Persons Breakfast Survey will be returned to the
Administrative Assistant office.
The Downtown update was included in the back of the flyer that
was sent out.
The content and format of a newsletter versus CDC day Open
House at Canterbury will be discussed at the next meeting.
The target of the message for the period newsletter would be a
potential developer, the financial community, Real Estate
Developers or any other entity which would be attracted to the
development of Shakopee in the future.
y�
Community Development Commission
January 6 , 1988
Page 3
The support service business must be ready for the future of
Shakopee 's growth. Perhaps the current commercial entities
could be interviewed to determine their choice of Shakopee. A
Process of self-education will be the key to growth for all of
Shakopee 's residents and leaders. A new look at future goals
and objectives of the community is needed in order to be
Progressive.
Joos/Koopmann moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 7: 00 p.m.
Barry Stock
Administrative Assistant
Peggy Swagger
Recording Secretary
�3
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 7, 1988
Chairwoman VanMaldeghem called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
with Comm. Schmitt, Czaja, Forbord and Foudray present. Also
present were Douglas K. Wise, City Planner; Steve Clay,
Councilman; Dennis R. Kraft, Community Development Director and
Jon Glennie, Planning Intern.
Czaja/Foudray moved to approve the posted agenda. Motion carried
unanimously.
Czaja/Schmitt moved to approve the minutes of December 3 , 1987.
Motion carried with VanMaldeghem and Schmitt abstaining due to
their absences at the meeting.
Schmitt/Czaja moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. The
meeting adjourned at 7:34 p.m.
Douglas K. Wise
City Planner
Peggy Swagger
Recording Secretary
Planning Commission
January 7, 1988
Page 2
Melanie Kahleck, 221 East 1st Avenue, explained that the
reasoning of the Downtown Committee in 12) on page 17 was to
eliminate cluttered appearances.
Page 17 12) change to read 10 display "and/or line items" and add
HH. Display - to the definitions section on Page 4.
Ms. Kahleck then asked for a definition of special events.
Page 5, B1 - Have staff define "special events".
Page 6 No. 4 eliminate "public function" and substituting traffic
control.
Page 8 N 1 was discussed which relates to the matter of signs
facing the interior.
Page 9, R and Item 9 on page 16 - more clarification of this from
Staff was requested.
An explanation of Area Identification Signs and how it applies to
specific examples.
Gill Patterson recommended that the Commission consult with
Naegle Sign Company for information.
John Breinhorst, 1st National Bank questioned the decision to not
allow public informational signs in the B3 (Downtown) District
and commented on the 5 year time frame for removal.
Staff was directed to obtain written directive from the Downtown
Committee on the Public information signs as it relates to the
Downtown Area.
Larry Griffith, representing Valleyfair, had several concerns and
requested exemptions and amendments to the sign ordinance. The
concerns will be submitted to Staff in writing.
Fred Corrigan, of the Racetrack also had concerns regarding the
Matrix board and whether it would be considered an applicable
sign. The fact of internal to a building vs. internal to a
facility was discussed. It was recommended that Mr. Corrigan's
concerns be submitted in writing to Staff.
Tim Keane, 1244 Canterbury Road, had concerns relating to non-
advertising signs and the size of which may not be able to be
read from the highway. His concerns will also be sent to Staff
in written form.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 7, 1988
Chairwoman VanMaldeghem called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
with Comm. Schmitt, Czaja, Forbord and Foudray present. Also
present were Douglas K. Wise, City Planner; Steve Clay,
Councilman; Dennis R. Kraft, Community Development Director and
-
Jon Glennie, Planning Intern.
Czaja/Foudray moved to approve the posted agenda. Motion carried
unanimously.
Czaja/Foudray moved to approve the minutes of the December 3 ,
1987 meeting. A clarification was requested of the reason why
the posted agenda was approved twice in the minutes.
Schmitt/Czaja moved to table the approval of the minutes of
December 3, 1987 until a clarification could be obtained from
City Staff. Motion carried unanimously.
Schmitt/Foudray moved for a 3 minute recess until the 7:40 p.m.
Public Hearing could be held. Motion carried unanimously.
Comm. Rockne arrived at 7:39 p.m.
Schmitt/Foudray moved to reconvene at 7:40 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO CITY CODE CHAPTER 4
SECTION 4.30 ENTITLED "SIGNS - CONSTRUCTIONS MAINTENANCE AND
PERMITS"
The City Planner reviewed the revisions to the Shakopee City Code
Chapter 4, Section 4.30 entitled "Signs - Construction,
Maintenance and Permits".
Changes to be made to the sign ordinance are as follows:
Page 20 - Sub. 5 A 3 delete "shall be considered to be part of
the signage and"
Page 20 5 a 2) add "no" before "larger than 300 square feet"
Page 7 - H) Add "to prevent glare onto dwellings and public
right-o£-way".
Page 10 - 4) Governmental Buildings - Incorporate A 4 into the
other zones. Do not add to B3.
Page 17 - More explanation was requested from Staff or the
Downtown Committee on 12) .
Planning Commission
January 7, 1988
Page 3
Foudray/Schmitt moved to continue the public hearing to January
28, 1988 with the only other items on the agenda for that
evening to be those which may be carried over from this meeting.
Motion carried unanimously.
Foudray/Czaja moved for a 10 minute recess at 9:35 p.m. Motion
carried unanimously.
Schmitt/Forbord moved to reconvene at 9:47 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL OF BRADBERG
1ST ADDITION
Schmitt/Forbord moved to open the public hearing. Motion carried
unanimously.
The City Planner reviewed the Preliminary and Final Plat of
Bradberg 1st Addition, a replat of a portion of Prairie House lst
Addition. No construction will be done on Outlot D or the back
area of Outlot A.
Tom Lyons, a representative of Bradberg, Inc. , stated that they
have applied for vacation of easements and replacement with new
easements will be made simultaneously.
Schmitt/Czaja moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried
unanimously.
Schmitt/Czaja moved to recommend approval of the preliminary and
final plat of Bradberg 1st Addition subject to the following
conditions:
1. Approval of the title opinion by the City Attorney.
2. Execution of a Developers Agreement for construction of
required improvements.
a. Installation of a water system in accordance with the
requirements of the SPUC Manager.
b. Installation of sanitary sewer and storm sewer in
accordance with the requirements of the design criteria
and standard specifications of the City of Shakopee.
C. A cash payment shall be made in lieu of land dedication
to satisfy the requirements of City Park Dedication
Provisions.
Planning Commission
January 7, 1988
Page 4
d. Street signs to be constructed in accordance with the
requirements of the design criteria and standard
specifications of the City of Shakopee.
e. Existing assessments shall be reapportioned according
to City policy.
3. Vacation of perimeter easements of Lots 1 and 2, Prairie
house 1st Addition shall be completed prior to recording of
the final plat.
4. Drainage and utility easements around Lots 1 & 2 must be
clearly labeled on the plat.
5. The name of the plat must be changed to Prairie House 2nd
Addition.
6. Looping of the water system shall be accomplished prior to
development of Lot3, Block 1.
PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF MEADOWBROOR RUN
Czaja/Forbord moved to open the public hearing. Motion carried
unanimously.
The City Planner reviewed the background of the Preliminary Plat
of Meadowbrook Run, upon the property located south of C.R. 16
and East of Pike Lake Trail.
Denny Griswold, representing the owner of the property, Darrel
Gonyea, stated that the property would be divided into 8 parcels
averaging approximately 7 acres. He stated that this plan works
well with the topography and grading of the property. All lots
are suitable for well and septic systems.
Darrel Gonyea, Owner of the property, stated that considerable
work has been done on the drainage ditch and it is expected to
handle overflow adequately. The responsibility for the ditch
rests with the Prior Lake - Spring Lake Water Shed District not
with the developer in this case.
The large size of Lot 8 was discussed.
William E. Price, Price and Associates, representing Walter
Mullenhart, is concerned that this project needs further
investigation. The land use plan of the City of Shakopee only
goes through 1990 and the growth of Shakopee is expanding
rapidly. There is a sanitary sewer system interceptor in the
roadway which leads into the Blue Lake Treatment Plant. There
are strategic development plans for the area east of Pike Lake
a-�
Planning Commission
January 7, 1988
Page 5
Road and South of C.R. 16 for future sewer service & roadways.
there should be a street plan developed for this area. Mr. Price
asks that this matter be treated in a manner which will give City
Engineers and Mr Mullenhart the opportunity to investigate this
further. this interceptor was to serve Prior Lake, Shakopee, and
possibly Chaska.
Mr. Price is of the opinion that a sanitary sewer plan on this
entire area should be carefully planned. There is also the
possibility of ledgerock in this area.
Darrel Gonyea stated that he checked with the City and was
assured that sanitary sewers were at least 10 + years in the
future for this area.
Bill Henning, owner of adjacent property, the Titus 2nd Addition,
Prior Lake, stated that there are drainage problems in the area
where this project is proposed and offered his plat for Titus 2nd
Addition for City Staff's inspection.
Gregory Struve, Suburban Engineering asked that more information
be gained on this before a decision is made.
Foudray/Rockne moved to continue the public hearing, and direct
staff to investigate the engineering information including
overlay maps, the Titus 2nd Addition plats and further study.
Motion carried unanimously.
Discussion was held relating to the possible update of the
Comprehensive Plan and more definition of what future needs will
be.
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT TOWER-
CERTAINTEED CORPORATION
Rockne/Foudray moved to open the public hearing. Motion carried
unanimously.
The City Planner reviewed the Application for Conditional Use
Permit to construct a tower addition in excess of 45 feet in
height upon the property located at 3303 East 4th Avenue by -
Certainteed Corporation.
Gary Swenson, of Certainteed stated that the structure will be
used for a second roofing line. This will be an increase in
operations and will emit more emissions. However, the Pollution
Control Agency has approved the emission levels. Additional dust
and fume control will be installed.
Schmitt/Rockne moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried
unanimously.
Schmitt/Rockne recommended approval of Conditional Use Permit
Resolution $515 allowing the construction of an industrial
equipment tower to exceed 45' with the following conditions:
1. The height of the proposed addition shall not exceed the 54 '
height of the existing tower.
Motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT OFFICE
ADDITION WITHIN THE FLOODPLAIN AT VALLEYFAIR
Czaja/Rockne moved to open the public hearing. Motion carried
unanimously.
The City Planner reviewed the request for the Conditional Use
Permit for 1466 Square Feet Additional to the existing office
building at Valleyfair. The existing dike does not meet DNR
requirements. There is an agreement to meet the requirements in
the next three years which will remove Valleyfair from the
floodplain area. The City has a copy of the letters from the DNR
outlining the agreement ending in 1991 to correspond with other
improvements.
Walter Wittmer, Valleyfair, stated that the diking plan includes
an increase of 1 1/2 feet. The addition will be used for office
space.
Foudray/Forbord moved to close the public hearing. Motion
carried unanimously.
Czaja/Foudray moved to recommend approval of Conditional Use
Permit Resolution No, 416 allowing Valleyfair to construct a 1466
square foot office addition within the floodplain subject to the
following conditions:
1. Applicant shall complete the diking improvement plan as
submitted to the DNR, within 3 years.
2. A copy of the DNR agreement be placed on file with the City.
Motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST FOR MINERAL EXTRACTION & LAND
REHABILITATION PERMIT FOR J.L. SHIELY COMPANY
Schmitt/Czaja moved to open the public hearing. Motion carried
unanimously.
The City Planner reviewed the request for Mineral Extraction and
Land Rehabilitation Permit for the J.L. Shiely Company to
continue the limestone mining and processing operations upon the
Planning Commission
January 7, 1988
Page 7
property located at 6896 Highway 101. The City Planner gave an
explanation of the DNR's policy of monitoring water pumping for
the site.
It was suggested that more effort be made to meet as the City's
Reclamation Committee. Discussion was held regarding the
possibility of an escrow or bond fund to cover reclamation costs.
Linda Schutz, Shiely Co. stated that they would not have a
problem with having a bond in place. She gave a background of
the new parent company of Shiely Co. , English China Clays.
Discussion was held regarding the restricted hours of operation
which were placed on the Company previously.
Schmitt/Forbord moved to close the public hearing. Motion
carried unanimously.
Schmitt/Forbord moved to recommend approval of a 3 year renewal
vf-Minoral-Extraction and Land Reclamation Permit #375 subject to
the following:
1. The plan of operation submitted by the J.L. Shiely Co. , is
hereby adopted as the mining permit and J.L. Shiely must
carry out it's operation in compliance with said plan.
2. J.L. Shiely must comply with all the conditions contained in
the Conditional Use Permit #375.
3. The City of Shakopee will reserve the right to negotiate the
establishment of a fee, bond or escrow account for the
future purpose of funding reclamation.
Motion carried unanimously.
I
Rockne/Foudray moved to acknowledge J.L. Shiely Company's
compliance with Conditional Use Permit #375 for the year 1987.
Motion carried unanimously.
FINAL PLAT APPROVAL OF STONEBROOKE FIRST ADDITION
The City Planner reviewed the background of the Final Plat of
Stonebrooke First Addition. The City Planner addressed the
concerns of Mr. MCKush which were submitted in writing.
Gary Laurent, Laurent Builders, Inc. stated that several of Mr.
MCKush's concerns were related to lots not being considered in
this plat.
Planning Commission
January 7, 1988
Page 8
Schmitt/Foudray moved to recommend approval of the Final Plat of
Stonebrooke First Addition subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval of title opinion by the City Attorney.
2. Septic system sites must be staked and roped off during
construction periods to prevent compaction of the soil by
construction equipment.
3. The developers are hereby granted a variance from the 10'
setback for septic systems from the rear lot lines of lots
adjacent to sewer easements. This variance constitutes the
extent of variances to be considered and/or granted with
respect to residential lots.
4. The golf course shall carry sufficient insurance to protect
it from any liability resulting from the play of golf over
public land and water. Said policy shall name the City as
co-insured.
5. Execution of a developers agreement for construction of
required improvements:
a. Installation of water system in accordance with the
requirements of the SPDC Manager, if the City decides
to operate the system and if not, installation must be
in accordance with the requirements of the State Health
Department.
b. Installation of a street lighting system in accordance
with the requirements of the SPUC Manager.
C. Installation of a storm water system in accordance with
the requirements of the City of Shakopee.
d. Construction of streets and location of street signs in
accordance with the design criteria and standard
specifications of the City of Shakopee.
e. Construction of a trail connecting Timber Trails
Addition to O'Dowd Park. Said trail shall meet the
specifications and have plans approved by the City
Engineer. The trail shall be completed prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the golf
course club house. The trail shall be used as credit
towards park dedication requirements plus a cash
payment. The City will also be provided a permanent
easement for the land on which the trail is located.
Planning Commission
January 7, 1988
Page 9
f. The City shall reserve the right to hire a consultant
or expert to do an indepth lot by lot study of the
suitability for on-site septic systems of each lot
within the development. The City may add a surcharge
to the permit fee for on-site sewage treatment system
inspections to cover the cost of such consulting
services.
6. The Planning Commission supports lease by the developer of
66' of park land between Lake View Drive and Lake O'Dowd for
.. $1.00 in exchange the developer agrees to maintain the
property.
7. Separate appurtenant utility easement agreements for each
lot platted shall be recorded by the developer at the time
of filing the final plat. Said utility easements shall
conform to the approved PUD Plan.
8. Lake View Drive South shall end at the established cul-de-
sac; a 16' right of way built to City standards to hold
emergency vehicles shall be extended from the cul-de-sac to
County Road 79. Emergency access shall be closed year
around, but there shall be break away barriers at one or
both ends; the developer shall maintain the 16' emergency
access road year around including snow removal.
9. Any access to County Highways will require an entrance
permit from the Scott County Highway Department.
10. All lots abutting a City Street and a County Highway shall
have access from the City Street.
The Building Department and building permits must ensure that the
proper ordinances are in force and the Building Inspector needs
to determine any unbuildable lots as they might exist.
Mr. MCKush stated that the high water mark was taken during a
drought and is incorrect.
Foudray/Schmitt moved to call the question. Motion carried
unanimously.
The motion carried unanimously.
The City Planner suggested that the Planning Commission review
and discuss their opinions regarding a Townhouse Development
Concept Plan.
Planning Commission
January 7, 1988
Page 10
Mr. William Jacobson of William Jacobson Associates is proposing
to construct townhomes in an area on the West side of Marschall
Road, just North of the future Vierling Drive alignment. This
area is zoned Agriculture. The City Planner showed the proposed
location on the zoning map. The City's Comprehensive Plan
recommends commercial zoning for this area because of its
proximity to the bypass interchange. Other potential areas with
R-3 or R-4 zoning were suggested. Mr. Jacobson feels that his
preference is a location within walking distance to the Junior
High and Elementary Schools. Several Planning Commission members
felt that the area should not be rezoned R-3. Mr. Jacobson
should submit his proposal if he feels ready to go ahead with the
process.
Schmitt/Rockne moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 12:05 a.m.
Douglas K. Wise
City Planner
Peggy Swagger
Recording Secretary
P/
SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY RECREATION BOARD MEETING
JANUARY 20, 1988
Meeting called to order at 2:30 P.M. by Chair Rislund in the Shakopee Community
Recreation Board Meeting Room.
Present: J. Carlson, D. Roper, L. Wermerskirchen and P. Rialund.
Absent : P. Sheldon
Staff . G.P. Muenchow, Director; M. McQuillan, Program Supervisor; R. Lewis,
Receptionist
Motion by Carlson/Wermerskirchen to limit the business of the January 20, 1988
Shakopee Community Recreation Meeting to the Minutes, Financial Report, Outstanding
Bills, and Goals. Carlson questioned whether it is policy to hold a Board Meeting
for the purpose of approving and signing bills. Chair wishes to withhold the Outstanding
Bills for further discussion.
Motion by Carlson/Roper to approve Consent Business with the Outstanding Bills
being withheld for further discussion. Carried.
Motion by Carlson/Roper to approve December Board Meeting Minutes. Carried.
(Approved by Consent Business)
Motion by Carlson/Roper to approve December Financial Report. Carried. (Approved
under Consent Business).
Chair questioned Capital Expenditures in regard to the purchase of the Answering
Machine and cassette recorder. Chair wished to know if there was a procedure that
was used for prior approval on non-budgeted items. Motion by Carlson/Wermerskirchen
that SCR Board establish a procedure on the purchase of non-budgeted Capital
Equipment also incorporating the setting of a dollar amount after which the Board
must pre-approve. Motion carried. Director will research procedure and report at
the February Board Meeting.
Motion by Roper/Carlson to approve the Outstanding Bills. Motion carried.
H 5 M Vending Co. Merchandise for resale at Skating Rinks $ 138.60
96 M&M's Plain
72 Reeses
36 Milky Way
36 Baby Ruth
36 Butterfinger
144 Licorice
420 @ $.33 - $138.60 Inv. #4085
Cindy Herrgott Reimbursement for Arts 5 Craft Supplies 23.25
purchased by Instr. Cindy Herrgott.
Mor-Tel-Co 1 Panasonic KK-T1412 Answering System @ 89.95
BMS/Office Stores I Display Option @ $132.00 plus 1 Dust Cover 138.00
Stores Sales, Inc. @ $6.00.
Radio Shack Inv. #389755 65.84
1 Micro-Cassette recorder @ $49.95
1 Micro-Cassette tape @ $6.95
1 AC Adaptor @ $5.95
1 Pkg. "AA" batteries @ $2.99
Suuthwest Suburban 2 yrs subscription to newspaper for SCR Office. 25.00
Publishing Co.
Southwest Suburban Classified Ad for Skating Rink Attendants 48.00 '
Publishing Co. placed from 12/09/87 - 12/16/87.
International Office Copier Maintenance w/o toner @ $85.00 139.07
Systems, Inc. 2,846 Copier Maintenance additional copies @
$54.07. Inv. 8020037.
International Office 1 cs. Multi-Machine Toner (Black) @ $85.00 88.00
Systems, Inc. plus freight @ $3.00. Inv. 8029494
Scott County Extension 1 Scott County Resource Directory for People 9.50
Working With People, @ $8.00 plus $1.50 tax
and shipping.
Northwestern Bell Tele Monthly charge for SCR Office from 113.88
12/25/87 thru 1/24/88.
City Of Shakopee Inv. 83428 - Fuel Usage - December 1987 29.30
70.3 gallons @ $.8025 less credit for double
payment of Equipment Repair Order 83251 on
11/10/87.
Mark J. McQuillan Mileage Expense @ 158 nl,: s @ $.21/mi. 33.18
for December 1987.
H & M Vending Mdse for resale at Skating Rinks (1988 bill) 130.68
396 bars @ 33C -
96 Snickers
48 M&M 's
36 Milky Way
36 Baby Ruth
72 Reese's
72 Skittles
36 Butterfingers
Business Outfitters Inv. 810463: 1 typewriter ribbon @ $3.55 $ 13.08
less 33% @ $1.17, plus Inv.810394 for 2
T381 Ribbons @ $4.19/ea. - $8.38 plus 3
ET121 LIft Off Tapes @ $2.30/ea - $6.90,
less 33%
Berens Market 40 cs. Asstd Cans pop (24/cs.)- 280.00
Mdse for resale at skating rinks.
Eastman Drugs Batteries used for Spell-Check on IBM 4.59
typewriter.
. Dunnings Hdwe. ,Inc. 6 keys made @ $•90/ea. Inv.93527. 5.40
City Of Shakopee Repair Staff Automobile. Inv. 83250. 88.52
Minn. Recreation 6 Membership Renewal - 1988 90.00
Park Assn.
Minn. Dept. of Public Renewal-Tax Exempt Renewal Fee for Tax Exempt 13.25
Vehicle.
Minnegasco Monthly service for SCR Office. 29.12
AT&T Current Billing for SCR Office. 2.04
TOTAL $1,598.05
1988 Shakopee Community Recreation Goals Work Session was next on the Agenda.
Session will be held next Monday, January 25 from 4:30 - 7:00 with a meal included.
On Monday, January 25 staff will come up with recommendations which will be
forwarded to SCR Board by Friday so that a it can be discussed and a consensus
�-f
arrived at and some general goals set. The following step will be to develop
objectives to go along with the goals.
Roper felt this to be very important and questioned whether a weeks time is
a realistic time period for something of such importance.
Roper/Carlson to authorize the recommended plan of action for the purpose of
developing a Coals Mission Statement. Motion carried.
Motion by Wermerskirchen/Roper to adjourn. Motion carried.
Respectfully Submitted,
Dean Roper, Secty.
SHAKOPEE COALITION
MEETING MINUTES - DECEMBER 3, 1987
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 AM by Chairman Brian Norris in the Citizens
State Bank Community Room.
Members Present: Gary Laurent(Shakopee Rotary), Dorothy Rockne(School District 720),
Brian Norris(Citizens State Bank), John K. Anderson,(City Of Shakopee), Phyllis
Hussong(Community Action Agency), Joan Salter(Food Shelf), Rev. Steven Homburg,
(Shakopee Ministerial Assn), Barry Stock(City Of Shakopee), Lisa Walker(St.Francis),
and George Muenchow(Shakopee Community Recreation).
Joan Salter provided a report on the Scott/Carver Food Shelf. 186 households served
in the two county (635 individuals) which amounted to 16,500 lbs of food. From
Shakopee there were 41 families. Her agency also helped 277 families with Thanksgiving
Dinners. Joan was pleased to report that one donor provided funds for all turkeys that
had not been donated per se. Organizations are doing a good job in providing donations.
With Christmas coming, food baskets and toys will be needed.
John Anderson was called upon to give an Economic Development Report:
1. Scottland has withdrawn their plans for the Starwood Theater.
2. Current Downtown Re-development project is 98% completed. Phase two takes
place next year. The new downtown bridge should be constructed in 1991_ The
Mini By-Pass will be needed to handle this re-location of traffic.
3. There is a revolving loan program to assist downtown businesses to tidy up
their building exteriors.
4. The downtown Community Christmas Tree (lack of the same this year) was discussed.
Since there is no room in the former location (NW corner of 1st Ave S Holmes) ,
perhaps a permanent one could be erected on the HE corner until a decision is
made on that empty lot.
Chairman Norris made reference to the Metro Paint A Thou Program held in August.
Perhaps this metro program could be extended to Shakopee. Project would need someone
to implement it. Are there any takers?
Gary Laurent shared that he knew of someone who is into building homes for the semi-
independent elderly. Interest was expressed by the group and Mr. Laurent was asked
to bring information to the next meeting.
Chairman Norris requested that members think of candidates for the Volunteers Of The
Month Award. Speakers will be located for 1988 meetings.
Phyllis Hussong distributed contribution envelopes to be used by the Community Action
Agency in thier "Give Where You Live" campaign.
John Anderson commented that the Chamber Of Commerce is in the process of selecting a
fulltime Executive Director. He further stated that the new St.Francis Hospital
Administration is re-financing their indebtedness using City Of Shakopee backing (not
financial).
The group reviewed the apparent lack of success in getting all groups in Shakopee to
send representatives to these meetings. It was decided to experiment in January with
a late afternoon meeting starting at 4:30 and ending at 5:30. Groups are also to be
encouraged to select people for terms of more than one year. They do not necessarily
have to be an officer of their organization.
Dates for 1988 meetings are: January 7 - February 4 - March 3 - April 7 - May 5 -
June 2 - September 8 - October 6 - November 3 - December 1.
The meeting adjourned at 8:00 AM. A special effort will be made to have good
representation at the next meeting including current members and those that have
not as yet participated!
Net meeting January 7 1988 - 4:30 PM - Citizens State Bank.
epectfully Submits ,
eor a .Muenchow, Seery.
SHAKOPEE_COALITION _
MEETING_MINUTES - JANUARY 7�_1988
The meeting was called to order at 4 :30 PM by Chairman Brian Norris
in the Citizens State Bank Community Room.
Members present: Brian Norris (Citizens State Bank), Barry Stock
(City of Shakopee), Gary Laurent (Rotary), Debra Bates (Shakopee
Community Education ), Joan Salter (Food Shelf), Mike Pennington
(Jaycees), Phyllis Husson (Community Action Agency), Kay Louis
(Scott County Extension), Rev. Steven Humburg (Shakopee Ministerial
Association), George Muenchov (Shakopee Community Recreation).
Members introduced themselves.
Larry L. Smith of Main Street Development spoke on the topic of
Alternative Housing for older citizens. His firm had done several
__.4)rojects -in- the metro area end- has--some up with--a plan to construct -
alternative housing if local groups such as churches are willing to
work with him cooperatively. So often currently it costs over
$700. 00 per month for rent which most Sr. citizens cannot afford.
His firm would build a unit of 8 apartments on 2 city lots (about
350 square ft/unit) at a cost of approximately S 800, 000. 00. This
would require a local sponsor with some land and willing to provide
some management services. THE REQUEST WAS EXTENDED TO SEE IF THERE
IS A CHURCH OR SIMILAR AGENCY WITH ACCESS TO SOME VACANT LAND WHO
WOULD BE WILLING TO EXPLORE SUCH A VENTURE. IF INTERESTED CONTACT
MR. SMITH AT 339-6122 OR ELSE GARY LAURENT AT 445-6745.
Joan Salter reported on the Food Shelf. The Holiday Project was
successfull. Lots of good cooperation on the part of many. Shakopee
users were about the same as in 1986. Cash donations were
S 19, 000. 00, which was exceptional. In December 223 families used
the Food Shelf with 59 from Shakopee. Joan has resigned from this
project to go into private business. She will be missed. There was
a discussion about the problem of single parents striving to rise
above the poverty level.
Kay Louis reported that the Scott County Resource Directory is
being updated. Anyone desiring an updated copy should contact Scott
County Extension - 492-2370.
It was agreed that everyone would make contact with at least one
missing representative from this meeting to insure attendance at
the next meeting. Brian will contact the Lions Club. Joan will
contact the League of Women Voters.
Debra Bates reported that Shakopee Community Education is
sponsoring a Seminar on AIDS on February 4 from 7:30-9:30 PM in the
Shakopee Sr. High School Auditorium. Advance registrations at
445-4884 ext. 217 is requested.
The next meeting will be February 4 at 4:30 PH at this location.
Reepectfully submitted,
George F. Muenchow, Secty.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
Regular Session Shakopee, MN January 14, 1988
Chairman Ziegler called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with
Commissioners Schmidt, Spiotta, Allen and Ziegler present. Barry
A. Stock, Administrative Assistant, John K. Anderson, City
Administrator and Mike Williams, Kare Kabs Manager were also
present.
Spiotta/Schmidt moved to approve the minutes of the November 19,
1987 meeting as kept. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Stock reported that in 1987 the City of Shakopee received a
Community Energy Council Grant to fund a six month demonstration
recycling programin two apartment complexes in our community.
.,Rr!er-to initiating the program, Mr. Stock stated that it would
be appropriate to survey the potential users to determine whether
or not they are currently recycling and whether or not they have
any interest in the program. Mr. Stock presented a draft survey
for the Committee's review and approval. Mr. Stock went on to
state that he will attending a seminar later this month that
focuses on other communities who have initiated apartment
recycling programs. He went on to state that he will hold off on
distributing this survey until after the seminar.
Allen/Schmidt moved to approve the apartment recycling survey and
directed staff to distribute it accordingly. Motion carried
unanimously.
Mr. Stock reported that - in June of 1987 the City of Shakopee
initiated an evening dial-a-ride service demonstration project.
The six month demonstration project is now complete. It would be
appropriate at this time to evaluate the evening hour service and
recommend to City Council whether or not should be continued.
Mr. Stock reviewed the monthly ridership totals for the evening
hour service. He went on to state that the average subsidy per
passenger trip for the evening hour service is approximately
$4.97. This compares to the system average per passenger trip
subsidy of $4.39. Mr. Stock reported that he budgeted for two
vehicles to be servicing the evening hours in 1988. However, due
to the demand during the day time hours, he recommended that only
one vehicle be operated during the evening hours.
Allen/Schmidt moved to recommend to City Council that the evening
dial-a-ride service program be continued in it's present form
through the remainder of the contract term. Motion carried
unanimously.
Mr. Stock reported that the demand for dial-a-ride service has
been steadily increasing for the past six months. This has
r �
prompted staff to investigate alternatives for servicing our
dial-a-ride program needs. He reported that Mike Williams,
Manager of Kare Kabs has done a preliminary analysis of our
existing service trends. Mr. Williams reported that the
dispatcher is beginning to receive complaints from passengers
whose trips are getting longer and longer. Additionally, it is
not uncommon for passengers to wait ten to fifteen minutes before
getting picked up. He noted that the number of rural trips is
increasing which puts time constraints on the urban runs.
Finally, the service is virtually unable to take same day
requests for service. There is no slack time. The majority of
the riders are calling with at least a 12 hour advance notice.
Mr. Williams then presented a list of the primary users of the
dial-a-ride service. He noted that the school district was using
the service to transport handicapped students. He questioned
whether or not this program was federally subsidized. He
suggested that the City check with the sclTool-- district to
determine if they could pay a higher percentage of the dial-a- _-
ride program service cost for transporting the students. Mr.
Williams then reviewed several possible service changes that
might be considered by the Committee. First he noted that an
alternative would be to increase the fare box recovery for trips
going over three miles. This would allow the system to
accommodate more in City runs. Second, he suggested that it
might be appropriate to charge those organizations that use the
system as a transportation alternative. Third, he suggested that
the City could put caps on the number of rides that can be
provided per month based upon available funding. Fourth, he
suggested that we could have a pre-qualification category for
persons who maybe eligible for reduced rates and increase the
other fare categories across the board. Finally, Mr. Williams
stated that there were only three ways to effectively control a
demand response operation. You must control demand by pricing or
serve only a fixed number of people or be prepared to financially
pay for the continuing demand.
Mr. Williams stated that the situation that is occurring in
Shakopee tends to occur in all dial-a-ride programs. He went on
to state that at the present time 95% of the rides are scheduled
with a one day advance notice. Mr. Ziegler questioned whether or
not there were any slack times during the day. Mr. Williams
stated that while some times are more heavily used than others,
he could safely say that there is no time of the day that we
could cut service. Ms. Spiotta suggested that staff investigate
what the school district would have to pay for transporting the
handicapped students if the dial-a-ride program was not
available. Mr. Stock stated that he would investigate this issue
and report back to the Committee prior to our next meeting.
Discussion ensued on the merits of a zonal fare policy. Mr.
Anderson stated that this was a difficult issue in that the
Shakopee Transit Program is funded by property tax dollars. He
thought that persons in the rural area might be opposed to a
�W
zonal policy because they pay the same proportion of taxes to
transit as those persons living within the urban area. He
suggested that if the Committee pursues a zonal fare policy, that
someone calculate the exact operating cost per mile of service.
This then could be used to justify a zonal fare policy. Mr.
Stock stated that he would have this information for the
Committee's review at their next meeting.
Discussion ensued on the possibility of eliminating all calls for
rides with less than a 12 hour notice. Ms. Spiotta stated that
she felt that this was one of the most valuable components of the
program. She believed that the less than 12 hour notice fare
category should be maintained. However, she also agreed that the
fares for calls with less than a 12 hour notice could be
increased. Mr. Allen questioned whether or not staff had any
idea on how much of a rate increase we would have to approve
before we could have an affect on demand. Mr. Stock reported
that this information was unavailable. He did however believe
that a fare increase could be adopted with little or no affect on
service demand. . -Discussion ensued on the merits of having a fare
increase. - Mr. Stock noted that even with a substantial increase
-- in fares, it was unlikely that a fare increase would cover the
cost of adding additional vehicles to the program. The point of
the fare increase then would first be to decrease demand and
secondly to increase revenues for the provision of additional
vehicles. Mr. Allen stated his concern that the dial-a-ride
program was meant to service those persons who have a transit
need. In his opinion, a fare increase may adversely affect those
persons who are truly transit dependent. Mr. Williams stated
that in many systems they have a pre-qualification category.
Those persons-.who meet the qualifications receive reduced fares.
- ---fir: -AnUeerson stated that the City could use the school districts
hot lunch program income guidelines to pre-qualify riders. Mr.
Stock stated that this type of pre-qualification program would be
possible but that it would be very difficult to administer.
Mr. Stock noted that another option that was available to the
Committee would be to eliminate the evening hour program and the
Saturday dial-a-ride program. The dollars that were budgeted for
funding these two programs could then be used to provide an
additional vehicle for the day time service. Discussion ensued.
It was the consensus of the Committee that a fare increase should
first be considered by the Committee and that the elimination of
service be considered as a last resort alternative.
Discussion ensued on the primary objective of the dial-a-ride
transit program. Mr. Ziegler stated that he did not believe that
the Committee had ever established a mission statement for the
Shakopee Transit Program or it's van pool and dial-a-ride
components. Initially, the major objective of the City of
Shakopee was to replace the existing transit service. (MTC) The
dial-a-ride program was simply icing on the cake. It was the
consensus of the Committee to establish a mission statement for
the transit program and it's two subcomponents. Ms. Spiotta
stated that she felt that after we clearly established our
objectives for the dial-a-ride program this would help the
Committee make a decision on whether or not Saturday or evening
dial-a-ride service is necessary.
Ms. Spiotta questioned what other transit programs had done when
they have been faced with a problem like ours. Mr. Stock
reported that he would investigate the fares in other dial-a-ride
programs and alternatives that have been used by other systems
who are faced with a service demand program. Mr. Stock stated
that he would prepare a mission statement and priorities for the
dial-a-ride program. Mr. Stock stated that he would like the
Committee to meet again prior to a formal public hearing on the
fare issue. It was the consensus of the Committee to meet on
January 27th at 7:00 p.m. to discuss various alternatives to
resolving the dial-a-ride demand problem. The Committee also
agreed to schedule a public hearing on the dial-a-ride fare issue
for February 11, 1988 at 7:00 P.M. The Committee suggested that
staff place a notice of the public hearing within the dial-a-ride
vehicles. -
The Committee then discussed goals and objectives for 1988. The
Committee stated that they would like to continue to be updated
on the transportation issues that effect the community. The
Committee also stated that they would like to be kept appraised
of the solid waste issues in Scott County and the community.
Finally, the Committee questioned whether or not the enabling
resolution could be amended to make refuse collection a
responsibility of the Committee. Discussion ensued on other
objectives for the Committee in 1988. Mr. Stock stated that he
would formulate the goals and objectives discussed---this -,eveni±ag
and report back to the Committee with a draft list for discussion - - -
at their next meeting.
The Committee then reviewed the dial-a-ride and van pool monthly
reports.
Spiotta/Allen moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:20 p.m. Motion
carried unanimously.
Barry A. Stock
Recording Secretary
TENTATIVE AGENDA
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting February 2, 1988
Chairman Steven Clay presiding
1. Roll Call at 7:00 P.M.
2. Approval of January 5, 1988 Meeting Minutes
3. Oath of Office - City Attorney
4. Resolution No. 88-1 - Amendment of the Regular Meeting
Date for the HRA
5. Revolving Loan Program
6. Other Business
7. Adjourn
Dennis R. Kraft
Executive Director
PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 5, 1988
Executive Director stated that the Bylaws provide for election
of officers and nominations are open for Chairman.
Wampach/Vierling moved to elect Steven Clay as Chairman of the
HRA. Motion carried unanimously.
Chairman Clay called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. with
Comm. Vierling, Wampach and Zak present. Also present were
John K. Anderson, City Administrator; Judith S. Cox, City
Clerk, Dennis R. Kraft, Executive Director and Julius Coller,
1I, City Attorney.
Vierling/Wampach moved to approve the minutes of December 15,
1987 meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
Wampach/Vierling moved to nominate Joseph Zak as Vice Chairman
Of the HRA. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Zak moved to nominate Jerome Wampach as Secretary of
the HRA. Motion carried unanimously.
The Executive Director explained the disclosure of real estate
Procedure to HRA members and asked that this be returned to him
shortly.
Vierling/Wampach moved to adjourn to February 2, 1988. Motion
carried unanimously. The HRA meeting adjourned at 7:12 p.m.
Dennis R. Kraft
Executive Director
Peggy Swagger
Recording Secretary
MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, Executive Director
RE: Amendment of the Regular Meeting Date for the HRA
DATE: January 26, 1988
INTRODUCTION•
Currently the Shakopee HRA meets in regular session every
other month. It is recommended that this resolution be amended
in such a way as to allow the Authority to meet on the first
Tuesday of every month.
BACKGROUND:
The level of activity of the Shakopee Housing and
Redevelopment Authority has been such that the every other month
meeting time has proved to be inadequate. As a result of the
semi-monthly meeting schedule it has been necessary during the
past year and one-half to call many special HRA meetings. This
entails not only receiving approval of the Chairman but also
having to place a special call in order to have the meeting
occur. It will be more efficient to have the HRA meet once a
month for purposes of the business which comes before it.
ALTERNATIVES•
1. Adopt Resolution No. 88-1.
2. Do not adopt Resolution No. 88-1 and continue meeting semi-
monthly.
RECOMMENDATION•
It is recommended that alternative #1 above be adopted.
ACTION REOUESTED•
Move to approve Resolution No. 88-1 which amends Resolution
No. 77-2 Establishing the Regular Meeting Date of the Shakopee
Housing and Redevelopment Authority In and For the city of
Shakopee.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-1
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 77-2, A RESOLUTION
ESTABLISHING THE REGULAR MEETING DATE OF THE
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR
THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
WHEREAS, the By -Laws of the Housing and Redevelopment
authority provide that the date of regular meetings of the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority be established by resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, that the
regular meeting date set by Resolution $77-2 be amended to read
as follows:
That the regular meetings of said Authority shall
be the first Tuesday of every month.
Adopted in regular session of the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this
day of _ . 1988.
Chairman of the Shakopee HRA
ATTEST:
Executive Director
4s
MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Administrative Assistant
RE: Revolving Loan Program
DATE: January 26, 1988
INTRODUCTION•
In an effort to encourage development in the downtown area
staff has been working on the development of a revolving loan
program that will provide low interest loans to property owners
interested in the rehabilitation of their buildings.
BACKGROUND:
Now that the City is proceeding with the downtown street
rehabilitation and streetscape, the Downtown Committee believes
it would be prudent for the City of Shakopee to consider offering
development incentive programs to property owners within the
downtown area (see attachment #1) to improve their buildings.
One method of offering financial assistance to property owners
interested in rehabilitation is through a revolving loan program.
The revolving program as shown in attachment S2 simply offers the
property owners an option when seeking an improvement loan for
their business. The program will provide loan assistance for
small and medium size commercial businesses in the downtown area
who are .interested in improving the front or back of their
building. The program does not provide funding for residential
rental rehabilitation. The proposed revolving loan program was
based on similar programs utilized in the City's of Duluth,
Waseca, Fergus Falls and Hastings.
The revolving loan program as proposed by the Downtown
Committee provides financing for 50% of the total loan requested
by the property owner. The maximum loan amount available from
the City shall be $50,000. The minimum loan amount that may be
borrowed from the City shall be $5,000. The interest rate for
the HRA's portion of the loan will be based on the loan term.
Loans with a term of 5 years or less will be offered at a rate of
3%. Loan terms greater than 5 years will be available for loans
at a rate of 5$. The maximum loan term shall be 10 years. For
example if property owner needs a $100,000 loan to improve
his/her businesses facade, he/she could receive 50% of that
amount or $50,000 from the City of Shakopee at an interest rate
of 3%. The remaining $50,000 would have to be provided by
property owner equity or financing from a local lending
institution.
Upon repayment of the loan, the funds would be returned to
the revolving loan account for reissuance, thus ensuring a
continuous pool of money to be reissued to fund rehabilitation
projects in the downtown area. Participation in the revolving
loan program would also require the property owner to adhere to
the Downtown Design Standards for rehabilitation as adopted by
the Shakopee City Council.
r
Initial funding for the revolving loan program could be
provided by the HRA Reserve Fund. The Downtown Committee is
recommending that an initial amount of $50,000 be allocated from
the BRA Reserve Fund balance to fund the Revolving Loan Program.
The 1988 HRA Budget carries a fund balance of $174,000.
Allocating $50,000 from the BRA fund balance would leave a
remaining balance of $124,000. Future source of funding for the
Revolving Loan Program may include the following: 1. assessments
that were originally deferred and paid with tax increment dollars
and retired by the property owner upon development, 2. State
grants and 3. foundation grants.
Staff has met with two local banks who are interested in
participating in this program. The banks will be responsible for
collecting loan payments on behalf of the City. Each bank will
be using their own loan approval guidelines in approving their
loans. The HRA will approve loans based on the local lending
institutions analysis of the applicants ability to repay the
loan. The local lending institutions will be named as the first
mortgagee of the property and the BRA will take second position
on the mortgage.
Shown in attachment #3 is a step by step description of the
process that an applicant would follow in applying for a loan.
The procedure identified in attachment #3 also identifies the
responsibilities of the lending institution, applicant and HRA.
While the amount of money being requested is not that great,
the Community Development staff recommends that this relatively
conservative fiscal approach be utilized until program acceptance
and success can be determined. A review of the program
utilization will be made in six to nine months and if acceptance
is .less than expected, it will be recommended that the finding
requested be returned to the fund balance. Likewise, if program
acceptance is good, additional funding may be requested.
I would request that the HRA approve the program guidelines
as recommended by the Downtown Committee and allocate $50,000
from the BRA Reserve Fund Balance to fund the Revolving Loan
Program.
ALTERNATIVES•
1. Move to approve the revolving loan program and allocate
$50,000 from the HRA Reserve Fund Balance to fund the
Revolving Loan Program as recommended by the Downtown
Committee.
Make suggestions for additions and/or deletions to the
Revolving Loan Program and move for it's approval with
$50,000 to be allocated from the HRA Reserve Fund Balance to
initially fund the Revolving Loan Program.
Table action pending further refinement of the Revolving
Loan Program
Do not approve the Revolving Loan Program.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative $1.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Move to approve the revolving loan program and allocate
$50,000 from the HRA Reserve Fund Balance to fund the Revolving
Loan Program as recommended by the Downtown Committee.
SP,
2L
LU
CO
m
SP,
_--
Mame
F71777�3
J .1 t 11
ME
IN
LU
CO
m
_--
Mame
F71777�3
J .1 t 11
ME
IN
Attachment #1
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND GUIDELINES FOR CITY OF
SHAKOPEE COMMERCIAL REVOLVING LOAN PROGRAM
FINAL DRAFT - JANUARY 22, 1988
A. INTRODUCTION•
The City of Shakopee's Commercial Revolving Loan Program is
a municipal program administered by the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City of Shakopee, designed to provide
incentives for major rehabilitation of existing commercial space
in downtown Shakopee. The Program operates by making available
commercial loans to rehabilitate and preserve existing commercial
buildings at an interest cost to borrowers significantly below
that available through conventional financing. Loans under the
Program will be made through participating local lending
institutions. The City and the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority will reduce the interest rate charged borrowers by
funding direct loans for a portion of the total project cost.
This program only provides financing for a portion of the total
loan and private financing or equity provides the greater share.
Eligibility for loans under the program shall be determined by
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority pursuant to the following
guidelines and restrictions. The credit worthiness of individual
participants in the Program shall be subject to the approval of
the participating lending institutions.
ELIGIBLE PARTICIPANTS
1. Any individual, partnership, corporation or other
business entity shall be eligible to make application for loans
under the Program. The applicant need not be the owner of the
premises to be rehabilitated; provided, however, that the owner
of the building shall be required to approve the loan and the
rehabilitation work, and to execute any mortgage on the building
relating thereto.
C. ELIGIBLE PROJECTS
1. Loans will be awarded under the Program for the
rehabilitation of small and medium-sized commercial buildings. A
commercial building shall be any building the primary ground
floor function of which is a retail, service, or office use.
2. Buildings qualifying for rehabilitation as small or
medium-sized commercial buildings eligible for loans under the
Program shall have a first floor total area not exceeding 10,000
square feet.
3. To be eligible, the building to be rehabilitated:
a. Must be located within the City of Shakopee
Downtown Development District (see map);
b. Must be in conformance with the City's zoning
code;
C. Must comply, after rehabilitation with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and with any approved
development plan for the Downtown Development
District;
d. Must not have been identified for public
acquisition;
e. Must be insured for its full replacement value.
f. Must comply, after rehabilitation with the City's
building and sign design standards.
g. Must follow the normal and customary building
permit process.
4. The City will provide direct loans at an annual
percentage rate of three percent (3$) for loan terms of 5 years
or less and five percent (5$) for loan terms between six and ten
years; for up to 50$ of the total project cost or $50,000,
whichever is less. The remaining amount shall be funded by the
borrower himself or a private sector lender.
5. Improvements and expenditures financed under the
Program shall be limited as follows:
a. Rehabilitation loans shall not include
expenditures for the acquisition, installation or
repair of furnishings or trade fixtures.
b. In the case of mixed-use structure, eligible
improvements shall include only those relating to
the commercial portion of the building, the
commercial operation of the building, or
mechanical or structural repairs relating to the
building as a whole (including but not limited to;
repairs to the building's facade, roof, plumbing,
electrical systems, structural elements, heating
and cooling systems, fire safety systems and
6
insulation as approved by City staff). All work
done must meet City Code.
C. Rehabilitation loans shall be used for the
rehabilitation of existing buildings, and shall
not be used for the construction of new
facilities. However, construction of reasonable
additions to existing buildings which, together
with other rehabilitation improvements, will
enhance commercial use of the building shall
constitute qualifying rehabilitation expenses.
d. The rehabilitation of residential units shall not
be allowed under the Program.
e. Refinancing of existing debt shall not be allowed
under the Program.
f. Loans shall not include expenditures for the
acquisition of property.
g. Building signage will be eligible for funding so
long as it is an integral part of a larger
building facade improvement. Eligible signage
costs shall not exceed 258 of the total project
cost.
D. IRAN REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS
1. Applicants must have the financial means to repay the
loan, as determined by the lending institution.
2. The applicant shall provide a mortgage on the building
as security for the loan.
3. The maximum loan amount which any applicant shall be
eligible to borrow from the City for the rehabilitation of any
particular small or medium-sized building shall be the lesser of:
(i) $50,000 or (ii) 50 percent (508) of the total project cost
for rehabilitation.
4. The minimum loan amount that may be borrowed from the
City shall be $5,000.
5. The maximum term of any loan under the Program shall be
10 years. This is the maximum term allowable; the actual term of
any loan under the Program shall be subject to approval of the
lender based on economic and financial considerations.
M
6. The City shall charge an administrative fee in the
amount of one percent (18) of the principal amount of the City's
portion of the loan, or $500, whichever is less, with respect to
each loan made pursuant to the Program. This fee shall be paid
by each loan recipient to the City prior to or at the loan
closing.
7. All costs, expenses, and fees associated with the
Project shall be paid by the applicant. Such costs are eligible
for inclusion in the loan, and include:
a. Cost of materials and labor (provided that
expenditures for labor performed by the owner or
the applicant or the owner's or applicant's
employees shall be eligible only if the major
occupation of the owner or applicant, as the case
may be, is construction or renovation).
b. Architect's fees.
C. Attorney's fees.
d. Bank charges such as, but not limited to, the
following:
(i) appraisal fees;
(ii) credit reports;
(iii) inspections;
(iv) abstracting and filing fees;
(v) mortgage registration taxes;
(vi) title insurance premiums;
(vii) service charges.
(viii) consultant fees
(ix) private mortgage insurance (if required)
(x) liability insurance
The City's administrative fee.
8. Rehabilitation loans shall not be approved unless the
building is being brought into full compliance with the
provisions of the City Code. The _City and/or the Lender will
perform a thorough inspection of the premises to be rehabilitated
prior to the approval of any rehabilitation loan under the
Program.
9. After rehabilitation and prior to retirement of the
loan, the subject property and improvements must remain insured
for its full replacement value.
10. Lender agrees to loan for a fixed period of time with
allowances for interest renegotiation at periods to be set by the
lender.
11. Prior to construction the Lender may require the
applicant to submit an insurance binder.
12. The City reserves the right to apply the provisions of
this program in a manner that most effectively serves the best
interests of the community.
E. SELECTION GUIDELINES
1. In approving applications for rehabilitation loans
under the Program, the City shall consider the following factors:
(a) The order in which applications are received.
(b) The availability and affordability of other
governmental programs;
(c) whether the building is required, pursuant to any
court order, statute or ordinance, to be repaired,
improved or rehabilitated; and
(d) Whether the proposed improvements will result in
conformance with building and zoning codes,
downtown design standards and improvement of the
aesthetic quality of commercial areas.
(e) Buildings of historical significance.
2. The City shall give priority to the following
applications for rehabilitation loans:
(a) An application that retains the character and
integrity of the Downtown Revitalization Plan.
(b) A joint application (two or more contingent
properties) that focuses on exterior facade
improvements.
(c) An application that focuses on exterior facade
improvements.
(d) An application to finance repairs or
rehabilitation which are required pursuant to
court order, statute or ordinance;
(e) An application by an applicant who has been unable
to obtain financing through other means;
5
(f) An application to finance the rehabilitation of a
building which is essential to maintaining the
commercial nature of an area.
REVOLVING LOAN FUND
All proceeds made available from the revolving loan fund
shall be repaid to the fund as it is collected for the continued
future use of similar programs.
Attachment #2
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
REVOLVING LOAN PROCEDURES
JANUARY 22, 1988
STEP ONE
Potential loan applicant contacts City. Applicant is
directed to contact:
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in
and for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota
Attn: Executive Director
City Hall
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
The HRA should forward the following to the applicant: 1. A copy
of the Program Guidelines, 2. A list of participating lenders
("Lenders") and the appropriate contact persons at each Lender.
Lenders shall have primary responsibility for the processing of
applications for loans under the Program and 3. A copy of the
Revolving Loan Program Loan Application.
STEP TWO
The potential Applicant contacts a Lender. At the initial
meeting with the Applicant, the Lender should take the following
actions:
A. Have the applicant complete the Revolving Loan Program
Application for the Program.
B. Review the Program restrictions with the Applicant to
determine eligibility of the building abd the proposed
improvements under the Program.
C. Determine if Applicant can provide a mortgage on the
property to be rehabilitated to secure the loan. All mortgages
must be executed by the fee owner of the property. If the
Applicant is not the fee owner, written agreement of the fee
owner to execute the mortgage should be obtained prior to any
other action on the loan application.
D. Review estimated costs Applicant will incur to obtain
the loan:
Bond Counsel Fee (If Applicable)
City of Shakopee Administrative Fee
Lender's Loan Fee
*Note: Step Two and Step Three may occur simultaneously.
7
Title Insurance Cost (Mortgagees Policy)
Consultant Fees
Recording Fees (Mortgage, Bond Documents)
Charge for Lender's Credit Report
Appraisal Fees
Mortage Insurance
Liability Insurance
Other Related Costs
These costs will be eligible for inclusion in the loan.
E. Advise Applicant that if the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority (HRA) should give preliminary approval to the Loan
Application, an inspection by the City and/or the Lender, a City
Code Compliance Report, and an M.A.I. appraisal will be
necessary.
STEP THREE
If, after completion of Step 2, the Applicant desires to
proceed with the Loan Application, the Lender should take the
following additional steps:
A. Have the Applicant complete the Lender's loan
application.
B. Have the Applicant prepare a detailed list of proposed
improvements and estimated costs for each; plans should also be
provided if they have been drawn.
C. Applicant's Revolving Loan Program Application, and
preliminary design plans and specifications, should be forwarded
to the BRA for approval, Attention: BRA Executive Director.
D. Applicant shall not to begin construction of the
proposed improvements prior to final approval of the loan by the
HRA. Improvements commenced prior to final loan approval by the
BRA shall not be eligible to be financed with loan proceeds.
STEP FOUR
A. The BRA reviews the applicants Revolving Loan Program
Application and supporting documents and gives its preliminary
approval to the loan. -
B. The Applicant prepares and submits personal and
business financial statements to the Lender. (If the Applicant
decides to fund 503 of the loan amount without the lenders
assistance, personal and business financial statements shall be
submitted to an independent accounting firm specified by the
City. The accounting firm will perform a credit report on the
applicant and report his/her findings to the BRA.)
C. The Lender performs a credit report on the Applicant
and gives its preliminary approval to the loan.
STEP FIVE
A. The Lender instructs the Applicant to obtain: (i) an
M.A.I. appraisal of the property to be rehabilitated (List of
certified M.A.I. appraisors may be provided by the Lender); (ii)
an inspection and City Code Compliance Report from the City; and
(iii) At least two written proposals on all improvements to be
financed from the loan.
B. The Lender gives its final approval to the loan.
C. The Lender forwards the appraisal, the Code Compliance
Report, the firm bids, the credit report, and notification of its
final approval to the HRA, Attention: HRA Executive Director.
D. The HRA gives it final approval to the loan.
STEP SIX
A. Lender, Applicant, and HRA determine closing date.
B. After closing date is set, mortgage is filed prior to
closing. A certificate of filing of the mortgage must be
obtained for closing.
STEP SEVEN
A. Lender notifies Applicant that rehabilitation work may
now begin.
B. Lender obtains abstract or proof of title to the
property from Applicant and applies for title insurance binder.
STEP EIGHT
The Closing
A. The City's administrative fee shall be payable at this
time.
B. Lender will receive assignment of the mortgage and the
promissory note and assignment of the promissory note from the
HRA or City, as applicable.
C. Bank should obtain a certificate of hazard insurance
from the Applicant in an amount determined by the Lending
Institution.
W
STEP NINE
A. Net proceeds of the loan will be deposited in an escrow
account at the Lender, with the Lender acting as Trustee. Lender
Will disburse from this account pursuant to a Loan Disbursement
and Escrow Agreement executed by and between the Lender, the
applicant, and the HRA. (Disbursement forms to be provided by
the Lending Institution).
B. Upon completion of improvements financed by the loan,
Lender will forward sworn construction statement and lien waivers
to title insurance company and obtain final title policy.
C. Any funds remaining in the escrow account after
completion of all improvements to be financed from the loan will
be applied to the loan balance, first to interest and then to
principal.
10
TENTATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNNESOTA FEBRUARY 2, 1988
Mayor Lebens presiding
1] Roll call at 7:00 P.M.
lai 1W,ty terra
2) Recess for H.R.A. Meeting
3] Re -convene
4] Liaison Reports from councilmembers
51 RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS
61 Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an
asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council
and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember
so requests, in which event the item will be removed from
the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence
on the agenda.)
*7] Approval of Minutes of January 19th and Special Session of
January 26th, 1988
8] Communications:
a] James Terwedo, Scott Cunty Attorney re: meeting with
the Council
b] League of Mn. cities re: legislative committees
c]
9] Public Hearings: None
101 Boards and Commissions: Energy & Transportation Committee:
*a] Dial -A -Ride Contract Amendment 45 Addition of A Second
Vehicle for the Chaska Dial -A -Ride Program
*b] Dial -A -Ride Evening Service
il] Reports from Staff: (Council will take a 10 minute break
around 9:00 P.M.)
a] Storm Drainage Refund for Cemetery - tabled 1/26/88
b] Site Planning & Construction - Tahpah Park Football
Field
c] Acquisition of Minnesota River Valley Trail Easement
d] Bond Counsel
TENTATIVE AGENDA
February 2, 1988
Page - 2 -
il] Reports from Staff continued:
e] Approval of Bills in Amount of $1,505,087.97
*f] Interfund Transfers
*g] Deferred Compensation Plan
*h] Temporary Electrical Inspector
i] Hard Disk and RAM Upgrade to Network
j] Appointments to Boards and Commissions
k] 1988 Liaison Appointments - tabled 1/5/88
121 Resolutions and Ordinances: None
13] Other business:
a] Business Cards for Councilmembers
b] Report from City Administrator on 1988 Legislative
Session "Tax Reform" Proposal
c] Set date for worksession to review 1987 mission
statement and d gals (Feb. 23rd)
d] F1�ws%
e]
f]
141 Adjourn to Tuesday, February 16, 1988 at 7:00 P.M.
John K. Anderson
City Administrator
l a,
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, Executive Director
RE: Appointment of Gary E. Scott to Shakopee HRA
DATE: February 1, 1988
INTRODUCTION:
There is a vacancy on the Shakopee HRA and this should be
filled by recently appointed Council member Gary E. Scott.
BACKGROUND:
Gary E. Scott has been appointed by the Shakopee City
Council to the Council seat which was declared vacant by the City
Council on January 5, 1988. This seat was formerly held by
Doloris M.Lebens, who is now Mayor of the City of Shakopee.
RECOMMENDATION•
It is recommended that the City Council appoint Gary E.
Scott to the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority
consistent with Council practice since January 11, 1977.
ACTION REOUESTED:
Move to approve Resolution 2865 confirming the appointment
of Mayor Dolores M. Lebens of Gary E. Scott as Commissioner of
the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
Shakopee City Council
129 East First Avenue
"3L3?a'UYTEEt`.'l4lY'�SJ.iiS t_..,•. �.. _., -..
Dear Council Members:
Consistent with the provisions of Chapter 462.425, Subd. 6
of the Minnesota State Statutes, I Dolores Lebens, Mayor of the
City of Shakopee hereby appoint Gary E. Scott to membership on
the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority. The term of
office will be until December 31, 1989.
DL:tw
Sincerely,
Dolores Lebens
Mayor, City of Shakopee
The Heart of Progress Valley
CITY
OF
SHAKOPEE
•
INCORPORATED
1870
129 EAST FIRST AVENUE,
SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA 55379-1376 (612)4153650
-
February 2, 1988
Shakopee City Council
129 East First Avenue
"3L3?a'UYTEEt`.'l4lY'�SJ.iiS t_..,•. �.. _., -..
Dear Council Members:
Consistent with the provisions of Chapter 462.425, Subd. 6
of the Minnesota State Statutes, I Dolores Lebens, Mayor of the
City of Shakopee hereby appoint Gary E. Scott to membership on
the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority. The term of
office will be until December 31, 1989.
DL:tw
Sincerely,
Dolores Lebens
Mayor, City of Shakopee
The Heart of Progress Valley
) O�
RESOLUTION NO 2865
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONER
FOR THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR
THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee on January
11, 1977, adopted Resolution No. 1014 which accepted the
resignation of the previous Commissioners of the Shakopee Housing
and Redevelopment Authority and appointed in their place the then
current members of the City Council, and
WHEREAS, it was and is the intent of the City Council for
all future members of the City Council to automatically serve as
Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
concurrently with their Council terms.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1. That the appointment by the Mayor of the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota of Gary E. Scott as Commissioner of
the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority until
December 31, 1989 and until his successor is qualified
is hereby approved.
That the above-named person will serve until a new
Council member has taken the oath of office as a member
Of the City Council and is qualified as a Commissioner
by taking the Commissioners oath.
Adopted in session of the City Council of
the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 2nd day of February,
1988.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1988.
City Attorney
1
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ADJ.REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 19, 1988
Wampach/Clay moved to convene at 7:02 P.M. Motion carried
Present were: Councilmembers Steve Clay and Jerry Wampach, and also
present was City Administrator John K. Anderson.
Clay/Wampach moved to take a five second recess at 7:02 P.M. Motion
carried.
Wampach/Clay moved to reconvene. at 7:03 P.M. Motion carried.
Clay/Wampach moved to adjourn to Tuesday, January 26, 1988 at 7:00 P.M.,
because of the lack c£ a quorum due to the snow storm. Motion
carried.
John K. Anderson .
City Administrator
Recording Secretary
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL I
Special Session Shakopee, Minnesota January 26, 1988
Mayor Lebens called the meeting to order at 6:50 p.m. with
Councilmembers Clay, Wampach, Vierling, and Zak present. Also
present were John K. Anderson, City Administrator; Phillip R.
Krass, Assistant City Attorney; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; and
Dennis Kraft, Community Development Director.
Clay/Vierling moved to accept the Special Call of the Mayor.
Motion carried unanimously.
Clay/Wampach moved to recess for an Executive Session to discuss
the Scott County Lumber Company, Inc. lawsuit. Motion carried
unanimously.
Clay/Vierling moved to reconvene. Motion carried unanimously.
Clay/Vierling moved to authorize the Assistant City Attorney to
proceed with filing a petition to appeal to the Supreme Court
regarding the Scott County Lumber Company, Inc. case.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous
Noes: None
Motion carried.
Clay/Vierling moved to adjourn at 7:15 P.M. Motion carried
unanimously.
Judith S. Cox
City Clerk
Recording Secretary
THE OFFICE OF THE �cb
SCOTT COUNTY ATTORNEY
COURTHOUSE 206
SHAKOPEE, MN. 55379-1360 (612)-9378240
JAMES A. TERWEDO
County Attorney
Mayor Delores Lebens
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
January 26, 1988
JgN2 X1984
c/ry4F��ko
I wish to congratulate those of you who have been newly elected to
your positions on the Shakopee City Council. I am sure that your
campaigns were vigorous and intense and you are as proud as I am to
serve the people within your jurisdiction.
I am sure that you have very busy schedules in the upcoming weeks
and months but I would request that in the near future I'd be given
the opportunity to meet with you to discuss the role of the County
Attorney with your city and to answer any questions you may have
relating to the County Attorney's Office and County Government. I
ask that you would have your staff give a call to my office to set
up a time which would be most convenient to you and your agendas.
Again I wish to extend my sincere congratulations to you and the
challenges you have accepted in your elected positions. If at any
time I can be of any help, feel free to contact me or my staff.
As always, I remain
JAT/mkh
Criminal Div.
Thomas J. Harhinson,
First Assistant
Neil G. Nelson
Kathryn A. Samelmann
W. R. Glasser,
Special Assistant
A. Terwedo
County Attorney
Civil Div. Human Services Div.
Clifford G. McCann Peggy A. Haig
Susan K. McNellis
An Equal Opponunity Employer
1
aures
RM
G
I ILt YE 0
H&4E
EAR Yi E!
Calling all city officials
Now is the time to sign up for legislative committees
Would you like to help shape the League's legislative policies
and priorities? The involvement of local officials is a key
component of the League's legislative success. Local officials
contribute to this success by identifying issues, studying and
recommending solutions, voting on legislative policies at the
Legislative Policy Adoption Conference, and through personal
contact with their legislators. LNC legislative policies have high
credibility with legislators because they know that the policies
are determined through the involvement of many local officials.
The League encourages elected and appointed officials from
throughout the state to sign up for a committee. There are six
legislative committees dealing with different subjects. The
committees are:
GENERAL LEGISLATION AND PERSONNEL discusses tort liability
and insurance, purchasing authority, open meetings, mandates,
charitable gambling, licensing of contractors, competitive bidding
issues, personnel, PERA, emergency medical services, veterans'
preference, and military leave issues.
LAND USE ENERGY ENVIRONMENT, AND TRANSPORTATION covers
wastewater treatment, solid and hazardous waste, ground and surface
water management, land use (planning, annexation, eminent domain,
and adverse possession), energy conservation, and transportation
issues.
REVENUE SOURCES deals with municipal finance, property tax
law, local government aid, and audits and financial reporting
issues.
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES discusses general development issues
including tax increment finance, industrial development bonds,
redevelopment, economic development authorities, and housing.
0 N
ELECTIONS AND ETHICS deals with election and ethical issues,
such as voter participation and a uniform election day policies for
example.
FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE handles issues in conjunction with the
development of the National League of Cities national municipal
policy. Policy areas are fiscal, development, environment, and
transportation.
In May, 1988, the League's president will appoint new legislative
committee members. The committee appointments are for a two-year
period (1988/89) that coincides with the state's biennium.
Everyone requesting to serve on a legislative committee will
definitely be placed on a committee. The League strives to achieve
balanced representation on each committee so we can't guarante you
will be placed on the committee of your first choice, but every
effort will be made to do so.
To apply for a legislative committee, please fill out the form
below and return it to Lynda Woulfe, League of Minnesota Cities,
183 University Avenue East, St. Paul, MN 55101.
PLEASE RANK YOUR PREFERENCE FROM 1 (FIRST) TO 6 (LAST).
I would like to serve on:
Development Strategies Elections and Ethics
Land Use, Energy, Environment Personnel and Public
and Transportation Safety
Revenue Sources Federal Legislative
I would be able to meet on Saturday.
I would NOT be able to meet on Saturday.
Name Title
Address
City, Zip
Home phone ( ) work phone ( )
Return to Lynda Woulfe, League of Minnesota Cities, 183 University
Avenue East, St. Paul, MN 55101.
C o nr S e N T 1 Dam
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Administrative Assistant
RE: Dial -A -Ride Contract Amendment #5 Addition of a
Second Vehicle for the Chaska Dial -A -Ride Program
DATE: January 28, 1988
INTRODUCTION•
Last year, the City of Shakopee amended the Dial -A -Ride
contract to allow for the provision of Dial -A -Ride service for
the Southwest Metro Transit System. On January 21, 1988 the
Southwest Metro Transit Commission requested the City of Shakopee
to amend the Dial -A -Ride contract to provide an additional
vehicle for the Chaska Dial -A -Ride program. (See attachment #1)
BACKGROUND:
On December 1, 1987 Kare Kabs began providing Dial -A -Ride
service to the City of Chaska via our Shakopee Dial -A -Ride
contract. Increase in service demand has made it necessary for
the Southwest Metro Transit Commission to add an additional
vehicle to the Chaska service. They have therefore requested the
City of Shakopee to amend our Dial -A -Ride contract accordingly
for the provision of an additional vehicle to service the City of
Chaska and the Southwest Metro Transit System. Provision of the
additional vehicle will be totally funded by the Southwest Metro
Transit Commission via our contract agreement. Additionally, the
City of Shakopee receives a 5% administrative fee for
administering the Dial -A -Ride contract. In other words, the
addition of another vehicle for the Southwest Metro System
generates an additional $225.00 in transit revenues for our
program and costs the City of Shakopee nothing.
On January 27, 1988 the Shakopee Energy and Transportation
Committee moved to recommend to City Council that Dial -A -Ride
Contract amendment #5 be approved (see attachment #2) providing a
second vehicle to service the Southwest Metro Transit System.
ALTERNATIVES•
Move to approve Dial -A -Ride contract amendment #5 adding a
second vehicle to the Southwest Metro Transit System.
Do not approve the Southwest Metro Transit Commission's
request for the provision of an additional vehicle for their
system and do not amend the Dial -A -Ride contract.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative #1.
ACTION REOUESTED:
Move to approve Dial -A -Ride contract amendment #5 adding a
second vehicle to the Southwest Metro Transit System.
Attachment of
1 rY
SfiMWESTMEiRO
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
(612)934-7928
JAN 2 61988
January 25, 1988
Mr. Barry Stock
City of Shakopee
129 -East 1st. Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear Barry:
Commission Members
At the Southwest Metro Transit Commission meeting of January 21,
1988, the commission approved the addition of a second van for
the Chaska Dial -A -Ride program.
Please amend the Dial -A -Ride contract pursuant to the
commission's action.
Sincerely,
Beverley Miller
Administrator
BM: pb
Patricia Pidcock
Gary Peterson
Robert Roepke
Tom Hamilton
Dale Geving
Gayle Kincannon
Attachment tit
10 P�
Amendment Number Five
Shakopee Dial -A -Ride
Service Contract Amendment
The following sections are hereby amended and adopted
effective February 2, 1988.
1. Amend Section 7. Consideration to read: The Contractor
shall submit requests for reimbursement of eligible actual
costs not to exceed $563,474 for the contract period. The
City will in turn examine and approve such requests as
deemed appropriate and submit them to the Regional Transit
Board for actual reimbursement.
2. Adopt Section 12m. Service Package: On or before February
15, 1988 and at the City's request, the contractor shall
provide a fifth vehicle to service the community of Chaska.
The charge for this vehicle shall be based on a twelve (12)
hour day for five (5) days per week at the contract rate of
$17.90 per hour. This vehicle shall be identified as a
Southwest Area Transit Vehicle and will be dedicated to
service the Chaska area unless as otherwise directed by the
City.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
By:
It's Mayor
By:
It's City Administrator
By:
It's City Clerk
DATE:
KARE FABS
By:
It's Director of Operations
DATE:
Co�seNT ILI
MEMO TO: John R. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Administrative Assistant
RE: Dial -A -Ride Evening Service
DATE: January 22, 1988
In June of 1987 the City of Shakopee initiated a evening
Dial -A -Ride service demonstration project. The duration of the
demonstration project was to be six months. Now that the
demonstration project is complete, the Energy and Transportation
Committee is recommending to City Council that the evening hour
service be continued in its present form through the remainder of
the Dial -A -Ride contract term. (April 1989)
BACKGROUND.•
In June of 1987 the evening Dial -A -Ride service was
initiated. The service runs between the hours of 6 PM and 9 PM.
Shown in attachment #1 is the ridership data for the past six
months. You will note that evening ridership has stabilized at
approximately ten passenger trips per evening (3.3 per hour).
The cost for the evening hour service is based on the contract
bid price of $17.90 per hour. However, when ridership exceeds
the maximum threshold as specified in the contract, the cost for
the evening Dial -A -Ride service increases to $19.90 per hour.
For the past four months we have exceeded our maximum ridership
threshold. At this time, the average subsidy per passenger trip
for the evening hour service is approximately $4.97. This
compares to a system average per passenger trip subsidy of $4.39.
I would like to point out that on several evenings we have
carried as many as 19 passengers.
I believe that one of the reasons for the low evening
ridership is that at the present time we are currently only
operating one vehicle. If a rider requests a ride to rural
Shakopee during the evening hour service, we may have to turn
down other persons due to the length of the rural trip. At this
time, the Energy and Transportation Committee does not believe it
would be prudent to add an additional vehicle for the evening
hour service when we are turning away riders during the day.
However, the Committee strongly believes that the evening hour
service is meeting a community need. The Committee is therefore
recommending that the evening service be continued in its present
form through the remainder of the Dial -A -Ride contract term. In
preparing the. 1988 Dial -A -Ride Budget, I included funds for the
continuation of the evening hour service.
ALTERNATIVES•
1. Continue the operation of the evening Dial-A-Ride service in
its present form through the remainder of the Dial-A-Ride
contract term.
2. Add an additional vehicle to the evening hour program on a
demonstration basis.
3. Eliminate the evening hour service program.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends alternative $1. (The recommendation of the
Energy and Transportation Committee.)
ACTION REQUESTED:
Move to continue the evening Dial-A-Ride service program in
its present form through the remainder Of the Dial-A-Ride
contract term.
0 (i
Attachment Sl
DIAL -A -RIDE
EVENING SERVICE
RIDERSHIP REPORT
MONTH
DAYS/MO.
AVERAGE DAILY RIDERSHIP
MONTHLY TOTAL
JUNE
- 17
4
68
JULY
23
6.5
149
AUGUST
21
6.5
137
SEPTEMBER
21
10.2
215
OCTOBER
22
8.1
178
NOVEMBER
19
8.6
164
DECEMBER
22
11.5
254
lam
Memo To: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
From: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
Re: Storm Drainage Refund for Cemetery
Date: January 29, 1988
Introduction
This memo is a follow up to previous memos concerning Shakopee Catholic
Cemeteries request for a refund of the storm drainage billings. Also,
attached is a memo from Rod Kress, Ass't City Attorney regarding the City's
ability to charge a storm drainage utility fee to tax exempt property.
Background
Last month, Tony Notermann-came to City Hall on behalf of the Catholic
Cemeteries to request a refund of all storm drainage billings since
inception (1/86). Mr Notermann felt that the charge was a special
assessment and that church property was exempt from special assessments.
Billings for cemeteries started in 1986 along with all other properties.
Billing cemeteries stopped as of December 1986 upon Engineering's
determination that cemetery property should not be billed for storm drainage
due to the unique circumstances of cemetery ownership and potential
hardships. Prior staff discussion had reaffirmed the original inclusion of
cemeteries receiving storm drainage billings due to the run-off criteria
originally established. Similarly, railroad property has also been removed
from billing. Procedure has been not to provide refunds retroactively to
affected properties. None have actually filed a request for a refund.
Ordinance No. 176, Subd. 7, provides: "If a property owner or person for
paying the storm water drainage fee questions the correctness of an
invoice for such charge, such person may have the determination of the
charge recomputed by written request to the City Engineer within twelve
(12) months of mailing of the invoice in question by the City. The
property owner may appeal the decision of the City Engineer to City
Council by filing notice of said appeal with the City Administrator
within sixty (60) days of the City Engineer's decision."
Subd. 4. Credits refers to credits made to property owners (see attached
Ord.). " Such adjustments of storm water drainage fees shall not be made
retroactively."
Attachment A was supplied to the City as evidence of payment of storm
drainage billings. The payments cover 12 months prior to the cessation of
billing, but only the 4th quarter of 1986 payments fall within the 12 -month
period provided by Ordinance No. 176.
There are three cemetery parcels in the city. One parcel is the Shakopee
Cemetery Association which paid the first quarter billing for 1986. The
second quarter was not paid and was certified for collection with the
1986/87 taxes. Based on the City Engineer's decision to not bill
cemeteries, the certification was cancelled about 12/31/86. The third and
fourth quarters billing were adjusted off the books the first week of
January 1987. Shakopee Catholic Cemeteries are the other two parcels and
have paid (as evidenced by attachment) the four quarters billed for 1986.
Alternatives
1. Deny refund of the basis that the billing was not in error and there is
no recomputation of the bill in accordance with the Ordinance. The
change to no billings for 1987 is a policy change, therefore no basis
for a refund. Tax exempt property such as cemeteries, schools,
churches and other government entities are not exempt for the storm
drainage utility and special assessments. That was one of the
rationale for establishing the utility.
2. Refund January 1987 checks ($416.66). This
is within the 12 -month
requirement of Ordinance No. 176, however the
recomputation criteria is
not met.
3. Refund all checks documenting storm drainage
bill payments ($1,853.73
as per attachment, for 12 months prior to City Engineer's decision not
to bill cemeteries. This appears to conflict
with Ordinance No. 176.
It would have to be interpreted that the 12
months would apply to the
time prior to the Engineer's decision made in early 1987 to stop the
billings and that the cessation of billing was a recomputation and not
a policy change.
4. Direct staff to research all billing back to
inception of the utility
and refund all billings. This alternative is very time consuming and
appears to conflict with Ordinance No. 176.
5. Change the Ordinance.
'Recommendation
Staff has discussed the issue and recommends alternative no. 5.
Action
Move to direct staff to prepare an amendment to Ordinance No. 175 exempting
cemetery property from storm drainage billing due to unique conditions
associated with a cemetery and to refund amounts already paid by cemeteries.
P/1 ..�.• nN. , ,;n.,e a liu •';.e... 1511,
f 4n. LUM«! eiRhtV three eek 63/1 [ e
L , IIULLARs
FIRSTL�IDc AA ONALo3NC
U=11AAR-EY o c- g_`
FUR stmn. or,lneer utr,,. r r
[ _
Fol 351 V"':0919019 C 3C' icn' I?i-9n % J ppp01b 963f
Cwmoucl Cx:u-rc]nes ol`SRwNOI¢F: Inc.
1530
Ju« 23
11'u.U.Not nm•of sn.xopee _ R _ $ — _—_ _
Tlurt hundr d furry eight " 30/300
�.[p�
1ULL\RS
FIRST NATIONAL
eEALM
. a.,.,
Fou swrc ure,nege �. .
n00 IS11F.f,C9:RD 19131:1 `-ri-G[9-9B` Jp0000 lb 3pJ',
CA ovc CE51r3PJOEP of SluKoEEE. INC.-
6uxwvxL Nu+Sxwr. seg < t -
[ I r
1538
e JUIv la 1J 56 T•v
lot:ux.or_ cin 6T smxn.« B � _L Sn__6._so
Fou- hwd«d thi,iv eight end 60/10 _ DoL s
�j�(VTI NATIONAL EAN6v
�!)1'AIIJw OFMSHAEOPEE
Folrston urelNeee [ soeeiN: Bme£enc� HCl/�'+a,,,
n00353Bn^':09190.443': 06�:29�9M/Ti�J0000343360J.
CAT ..0 CE -1—N OF $IIAEOPEF^'NC.
1561
Octo!« 6 RO B6
WNULNOF hN Of $MMapee 5.160.5. '
Four hundrtd &IM' N 54/1 noLLANs
�f FIRST NATIONALHAN6
1'111JA OP�SNAKOPEE \\�/
np0366 Y•C09390 i943C 03-�27�9n lOD00046D 54.+
CATUODC CCNCc lEs of slu,.OPEE. INa
1578
-9/.9 ,.'=
Jevuary e. IES,
�UvuxliuF [itv oT M"...5
ns -3,
Three hundmd fiftt• five —e 3./ O
OL N
F M'NATONAL AAAS
or sluk
�Ee
e
\
Fm1 service 9/3o ¢12/25/6
'
__,-_.,_ /1003578/1 •':09190 i943t
�CY i2? -9/ �•"'J'fd5OOL135539.+
-9/.9 ,.'=
01
e
s.'
V8
IS
A
01
I
-9/.9 ,.'=
|Jy 'ft 17 !
7h,fit-,
U
�\
.JE
)W26.
|Jy 'ft 17 !
7h,fit-,
�\
LAW OFMCFS
KRASS & MONROE
CFK RID
Phillip R. Koss
Dennis L. Monroe
Barry K. Meyer
Trevor R. Walsten
Jay D. GoNberg
ElUabelh B. McLaughlin
Susan L Esdll
Diane M. Carlson
Lachlan B. Muir
Robert J. Wafter
MEMORANDUM
Kent A. Carlson. CPA
TO: John Anderson
FROM: Phillip R. Brass
DATE: January 28, 1988
RE: Storm Drainage Fees
Dear John,
IIS
:j;v{ yI9
Marscha0p_ A Business Cerner
32iftlg suRrd
P.O. Box 21 F
Shakopee. Minnesom 55379
Telephone 4455080
FAX 4457640
You have requested I render an opinion relative to the authority of the
City of Shakopee under Minnesota Statutes 5444.075 to impose a charge on proper-
ties which receive the benefit of the City's storm drainage facilities. In par-
ticular, you have asked whether or not a property which may be exempt from ad
valorem taxes may still be liable for this utility charge.
Subd. 1(a) of the above -referenced Statute authorizes any municipality
to build, construct, reconstruct, repair, enlarge, improve, or in any other
manner obtain a aeries of utilities which include under Subd. (iii) storm sewer
systems including mains, holding areas and ponds, and other appurtenances and
related facilities for the collection and disposal of storm water.
Subd. 2 of the Statute authorizes the City to issues bonds to pay the
cost of such facilities and pay those bonds from ad valorem taxes or from spe-
cial assessments to be levied to pay the cost of the facilities, or from reve-
nues derived from water and sewer service charges. That subdivision goes on to
state that real estate tax revenues (ad valorem taxes) should be used only, and
then on a temporary basis, to pay general or special obligations when the other
revenues are insufficient to meet the obligations. That subdivision states when
special assessments are pleged for the payment of these oblgiations they shall
be authorized and issued in accordance with Chapter 429.
Subd. 3 specifically authorizes the governing body to impose "just and
equitable charges for the use and availability of the facilities and for the
connections with them . ' This subdivision goes on to say "charges made for
service directly rendered shall be as nearly as possible proportionate -to the
cost of furnishing the service and sewer charges as may be fixed on the basis of
water consumed, or by reference to a reasonable classification of the types of
premises to which service -is furnished, or by reference to the quantity, pollu-
Mr. John Anderson
Page -2-
January 28, 1988
tion qualities and difficulty of disposal of sewage and storm water produced, or
on any other equitable basis including, but without limitation, any combination
of those referred to above."
As I understand it, the storm drainage utility fees you charge depend
on the type of facility and the area of the property in question. They are,
therefore, akin to a special assessment which, of course, is authorized by Subd.
2 of this law. Since the charges are not paid out of ad valorem taxes, and
indeed the Statute gives an obvious preference that these costs not be paid from
ad valorem taxes but rather as user fees, so long as your charges are reasonable
and as directly related as possible to the cost of the service, it is my opinion
that such charges may be levied against all properties so served, even proper-
ties which are exempt from ad valorem taxes.
I would analogize this situation to a special assessment. If we build
a sanitary sewer system along a street which includes properties both subject to
and properties exempt from ad valorem taxes, we assess both because both are
served by the utility we are constructing. A storm sewer utility is no dif-
ferent. While a property may validly be exempt for policy reasons from ad
valorem taxes, that property is not exempt from paying its fair share of direct
utility services provided by the municipality.
In conclusion, it is my opinion that Chapter 444.075 gives the City the
authority it needs to levy fair and proportionate fees to properties served by
the City's storm drainage facilities.
VOKRASM
RED
PRR:ph
I/ a�
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Cemetery Property Billing - Informational
DATE: January 19, 1988
Introduction
It appears that there were three cemetery parcels that were billed for
storm drainage for 1986. Two are the Catholic Cemetery's which paid all four
quarters that were billed for 1986 (according to copy of cancelled checks
attached to memo dated 1/15/88)'
The other cemetery apparently paid one quarters billing (first quarter),
had the 2nd quarter certified for collection on the taxes but we cancelled the
certification about 12/31/86. The third and fourth quarters were adjusted off
the register the first week of January 1987.
--44aknpec C4nmmunitg #eruices
129 Levee Drive
Shakopee. Minnesota 55379
Phone 4452742
Community Education • Parks • Recreation • Adult Education
Memo To: John Anderson, City Administrator
From George Muenchow, Community Recreation Director
Subject: Site Planning & Construction-Tahpah Park Football Field
Date January 28, 1988
Introduction
Tahpah Park is a City Of Shakopee Community Park providing facilities for the
playing of softball, baseball, and football/soccer. A Master Plan was developed
15 years ago. The Shakopee Jaycees have functioned since then as a partner in
the development of the park. All softball and baseball fields are in place and
are being used. The football field is yet to be built.
Background
The current Park Capital Improvement Program Plan indicates that the football
field should be constructed during the years of 1986-1991. Designated funding
sources are the Shakopee Jaycees and the Park Reserve Fund. The Shakopee
Jaycees have allocated approximately $20,000.00 towards this project in 1988.
The Shakopee Youth Football Association also has funds that they are willing
to expend.
At the present time there is an urgent need for this field. The Shakopee
Youth Football Association, an Auxiliary Agency of Shakopee Community Recreation
makes use of football playing space at the Sr High School and in the outfield
of the Tahpah Park Baseball Field. As volunteers they are basically only
available to work with these youngsters after working hours. One more lighted
field is needed.
Shakopee Engineering Department is ready to provide the lead in the preparation
of site plans etc. Authorization is needed from the City Council giving
permission for them to work on this project. Estimated time - 40 hours.
Alternatives
1. Authorize City Engineering Department to prepare plans and specifications
for the construction of the Tahpah Park Football Field.
2. Deny the request for Engineering Department involvement at this time,
recognizing that the Youth Football Program will continue to suffer for
lack of adequate facilities.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Shakopee
to develop plans and specifications
at Tahpah Park with the cost to be
Fund and community donations.
Recommended Action:
City Engineering Department be authorized
for the construction of a football field
absorbed from funds in the Park Reserve
Authorize the Engineering Department to develop plans and specifications for the
construction of a football field at Tahpah Park with the cost to be absorbed from
funds in the Park Reserve Fund and community donations.
A COOPERATIVE EFFORT OF THF CITY ng AMAIrnCGF nun crunni MCTorrTT OMrc WGn
,
,
,
,
,
I
I
,
I
I
-------------
,
L-1
TAHPAH N
PARK W+E
S
PARKING LOT
BASEBALL
FIELD
\ / FOOTBALL FIELD
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Acquisition of Minnesota River Valley Trail Easement
DATE: January 28, 1988
Introduction
The Shakopee City Council, at its December 15, 1987 meeting,
authorized staff to negotiate for City acquisition of an easement
for the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Minnesota River
Valley Trail across the Robert Sweeney property between Market
Street and Minnesota Street north of Bluff Avenue. I have met
with Robert Sweeney and we have arrived at a tentative proposal
which I have reviewed with Bill Weir of the -DNR.
Tentative Proposal
Robert Sweeney will receive:
1. A dredging permit from the City of Shakopee to place
dredge material in Huber Park at his expense.
2. The easterly 30 feet of Market Street R -O -W upon the
vacation of Market Street north of the trail easement.
3. The westerly 30 feet of Market Street R -O -W for $1.00
from the -City which will receive it from the DNR by
--- - - prior agreement before the vacation.
4. Clear title to the westerly 30 feet of Minnesota Street
right-of-way placed in Mr. Sweeney's name. (Note: this
will net Mr. Sweeney approximately 90 feet of space
adjacent to the proposed marina.) (In clearing the
title Mr. Sweeney would like us to investigate the
possiblility of his acquiring clear title to the
easterly 30 feet of Minnesota Street too.)
5. Allow Mr. Sweeney use of the City trail easement for
access to and from his property. (Note: this then
excludes the use of the easement by his customers.)
6. Construction of a private driveway from Bluff Avenue on
Minnesota Street north to the northerly edge of the
City's trail easement.
7. Construction of a retaining wall and opaque fence along
the southerly edge of the trail easement by the DNR.
Robert Sweeney contributes:
1. A 15 foot wide trail easement to the City along the
current sanitary sewer easement for trail and utility
purposes.
2. A seasonal easement along the southern river bank for
use by snowmobilers during the winter season.
Department of Natural Resouces will receive: -
1. The right to construct a 12 foot wide paved pedestrian
trail across a 420 foot long 15 foot wide trail
easement under the City's control.
2. Use of a seasonal easement along the southerly edge of
the river for snowmobile trails.
Department of Natural Resources provides:
1. Construction of a 12 foot wide asphalt pedestrian trail
across the City's 420 foot long 15 foot wide easement.
2. Construction of a retaining wall along the southern
edge of the trail easement across the 420 foot long
easement controlled by the City. -
3. Construction of an opaque fence along the retaining _
wall and southern edge of the trail easement along the
420 feet of the easement with the exception of any
driveway accesses and/or gates at Market Street and ---
Minnesota Street.
4.. Construction of a private drive on property to be owned
by Robert Sweeney on Minnesota Street of sufficient -
strength to hold vehicles pulling boats.
5. Maintenance of their trail, fencing and retaining wall
and the City's easement right-of-ways. -- - -_
6.- An agreement holding the City harmless from any
liability for injuriesreceived by people using the -
trail.
City of Shakopee will receive:
1. A 420 foot long by 15 foot wide trail and utility
easement across Mr. Sweeney's property. _
2. A commitment by DNR to construct the pedestrian trail
from its current termini near the Recreation Office -
- west to Murphy's Landing in 1988 and 1989.
3. A Seasonal easement for a snowmobile trail along the -
southern bank of the Minnesota River. -
City of Shakopee contributes:
1. Vacation of Market Street north of the trail easement
with 60 feet of right-of-way provided to Mr. Sweeney.
Clear title to the westerly 30 feet of the right-of-way
of Minnesota Street.
Access along the pedestrian trail for private use by
Mr. Sweeney as described above.
4. Access across the pedestrian trail at Market Street and
Minnesota Street by Mr. Sweeney's customers and the
DNR. (Note: The City would retain a north/south storm
sewer easement in the Market Street right-of-way for
access to its storm sewer presently located in this
street.)
Alternatives
The City Council can direct the appropriate City officials
to draft the necessary agreements to implement the tentative
proposal as outlined.
PROS: The City, in pursuing this alternative, would: a) be
the beneficiary of a DNR trail extending east to Murphy's
Landing that would help develop the river front and become
an attraction drawing people into our City and downtown; b)
have the potential to receive fill material from the dredge
to improve Huber Park; and c) benefit from the improvement
of the marina drawing more boat users to the river and our
downtown area.
CONS: For these benefits the City would: a) be vacating
Market Street north of the proposed easement; b) incurring
legal costs to clear up the title of the right-of-way on
Minnesota Street to place it in Mr. Sweeney's name; and c)
incure minimal liability exposure for accidents along the
trail in our easement right-of-way. There would be no
change in our insurance premium to add this coverage because
it falls within normal City park and recreation exposures
and because the DNR agreement to hold the City harmless.
Council could modify the tentative proposal prior to
directing the appropriate City officials to draft the needed
agreements.
Council could reject the proposal. This means that the
trail would not be constructed until such time that Mr.
Sweeney or the DNR would have the incentive to overcome
their current impasse in negotiations.
Recommendation
I recommend alternative No. 1 or 2 above. The tehtative proposal
is in comformance with the general wishes of the neighborhood
which, at a meeting held in 1987, was apprehensive about the
construction of the DNR trail. Neighbors were particularly
interested in having snowmobiles use the river bank rather than
the trail right behind their homes. The neighborhood was
generally opposed to the easy solution, which was to re-route the
trail along Bluff Avenue in existing City street right-of-way.
Normally the City uses guarantees of various types in its
development agreement to insure follow-through by the developer
in exchange for any value contributed by the City. In this case
George Muenchow and I feel the value will be returned with the
construction of the trail by the DNR, and therefore we will seek
no development guarantee from Mr. Sweeney to build the marina.
If Councilmembers view this differently we need to discuss this
at the meeting.
Action Requested
Direct the appropriate City officials to draft the necessary
agreements and to initiate street vacations where appropriate to
implement the acquisition of trail easements through Mr. Robert
Sweeney's property for the construction of the DNR Minnesota
River Trail.
JKA/jms
Valley Engineering Co., Inc. ,,, E
T.i pnm 4 7-257n V.q. Lnk.• Mmnespto 55372
H LANES
i
�J 1
J �
1,
w•
Wi
y I
LL'
J
F
Q�W 1`
Ct B l'J >=F STREET —•
1._50
E -ST EWEST <C
EP
I I
I Y
Ct B l'J >=F STREET —•
1._50
// d
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Bond Counsel
DATE: January 29, 1988
Introduction
The attorney that the City has been using for bond counsel is leaving the
firm that has handled the City's bond work for about the past 4 - S years.
Council need to address the issue of selection of bond counsel.
Background
The City has used O'Connor Hannan as bond counsel for the past four or
five years. During that time we have had about four different attorneys within
that firm doing the work. The current attorney is James O'Meara and he is
moving to Briggs and Morgan next week.
It appears that there is a lack of experience/expertise left in the bond
department at O'Connor Hannan. It has been reported that there is only one
attorney left who is also relatively new to the firm. Therefore, there are two
options for the Council to consider.
One) Continue to use James O'Meara as bond counsel at Briggs and Morgan.
Staff and Springsted are comfortable with Mr. O'Meara and have no reservations
about continuing to use him. There may be an advantage to the City to continue
to use him especially for the storm drainage bond work with which he has been
involved and has the background for Shakopee.
Two) Develop and sent out request for proposals (RFP) for bond counsel
work. This would give Council an opportunity
the
service and get an idea of the costs. Biggs and Morgan swouldllahaveeanoequal
opportunity to respond. The City could consider splitting up the work and
keeping Mr. O'meara for the storm drainage or tax increment work and giving the
general obligation work to some other firm. Perhaps the Asst Attorneys would
be interested in pulling some of the work to do "in house",
Rod Kress
sending out RFP's to see what response there is for Council considerationfavors
Alternatives
1. Stay with O'Connor Hannan.
2. Stay with James O'Meara.
3. Select another firm on the spot. -
4. Sent out RFPs.
Recommendation
Alternative number 4.
Action Requested
Move to direct staff to develop and send out request - 4 for proposals for
bond counsel work.
0 0 0 00 �o a 080
O O
O
O of Hf O e m T
O O N
m O� 17 Ol x'7 O
> L b
O n C o T a W d P G
W J m U O WO' N
V 6 W~ O 41 Y Y N Y Z W W
E N L Z J N GI N N C UI ✓1 W C Oa
N 1-� LL OIC 3 C L V W Y: O V
L
C d Y L Y 0 E C N m i Y OO F F
O W G W N N p '3
N N N NN N n m m m m m m
NNW O.
_
O p
t0 M m N' n O
E Y Y 01 O O
rn E in c w w c W
T a E W � M -
�n •J t w l m E E T T++ Op
J U> O O N 6 6 N C
OI e3 N �� C W LLLL£ r Vl 1 W Ul VI n nN ii rcl N
Y W y 0.4- O
N C n O C
O L E E E L W N W C C W r W]]
0 o m L J T E E r_ '� ++ •� �'+ T O W W
O N N
UC.0
O O O 00
0 a rnee O n O O m e0 000 000 _
0 0 00 O O�MO O M 0 0 0 NO ONO 000 N
O M O t0 m0 Ot a OON T Na
O m O O O Y� V� M O 'O C
T Ol itl •'+ m Gi
m �. N
4H e y
n M m Y NO m u d �• «
- u u 0 0 3
�UUuO-3
0 0 0 00 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 00 000000 m v�oyE 0
0 0 0 00 0 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 00 000000 N dmm m,O..myuj
Nd W
---
m m m m m MM �nm�n omm �-
O
F o Minnnmm
ti000 O O O O O 00 OOONOO
M N .-�.r ti .r 000 0 0 0 0 O 00 OOO.i00
M M e1� n M
000 O O O O O 00 000.-100
M .a .-r N 000 O C0 0 0 00 OOONOO
.r M N N•'-� ^'+ ti 000 O O O O O 00 OOO.i00
M M L9 n M
O O N m M O_ O_ �"; N O
N O r -i 00 C NNN M N N N N .+O�MM
zO b
e M m MM v eee e e e e e ee eees MM
O M.'+ mmm m m m m m MM N�n�OY.Y
O O 1�n n O
I
M
o
v
v
e
N
IO
n
N
O.i
_
.n
o
IOn
I�
N
W
N
W
rn
TOl
N
N
N
N
N
W
O
N
n
0
0
N=
N N
N
N
b
N
N
N
N
>
N
o
o
a
E
Y
N
N
N
•
N
N N
M
C
.ti
N A d
W
M
10
m
N
n
O
n
�O Oi
r--
N
4.
O
lO
q
i
i
q
y
L
N
N
Y Y^
O
as
L
L
Y
L
641 'd ttl
L
O
O L C y
N
K
CKF
h
C
O
O
C
N
7
1
C
VA1
Jri 4:U
01
N
9
C
m
L
L
p
O
y
C
L
t
O
a
A>
t
c
A
E
T
I
I
V
Yl
>
O N
A �
A
O
O
Y
Q
Z
Z
U
41
¢
0
3
a_
v
v
v
e
N
IO
n
N
O.i
_
IOn
I�
N
W
N
W
rn
TOl
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N=
N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
>
N
o
o
a
E
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N N
NOW O N W O N n 0 0 0 n 0 0 u
M9 N O O O O N N n N O N SOH O
W t0 M O S l0 O W N M 10 O n N N �O' pl n
O1 N 10 W N 10 N n OI OI � n �O W m
nN rl M M W N W Q HQ N pOj
W N h
000 O O O O O O p 0 0 0 0000
000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M0oo
W N O N N f N
000 O O O O O .+ W O v N OO O.Y
000 O O O O O�
O O O 0 0 0 0 0
4 ti O N N OO O In
O O O O O O O O W O N N
R
NNN M N N N N O m M�� O.ti N�
01 01 01 01 T 0\ S a\ .ti .y Of M M M t0 � Vl
Q<? Q C R< V C P C C< Nct M1
W W W W W W W W 0
M Q
ti W N O NN tiN
OI
C N
n
>
o
o
a
E
Y
>1 Sr
C
N A d
Ll LL
r--
N
4.
q
i
i
q
y
L
N
N
Y Y^
O
as
L
L
Y
L
641 'd ttl
L
O
O L C y
CKF
h
C
O
O
C
N
7
1
C
VA1
Jri 4:U
NOW O N W O N n 0 0 0 n 0 0 u
M9 N O O O O N N n N O N SOH O
W t0 M O S l0 O W N M 10 O n N N �O' pl n
O1 N 10 W N 10 N n OI OI � n �O W m
nN rl M M W N W Q HQ N pOj
W N h
000 O O O O O O p 0 0 0 0000
000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M0oo
W N O N N f N
000 O O O O O .+ W O v N OO O.Y
000 O O O O O�
O O O 0 0 0 0 0
4 ti O N N OO O In
O O O O O O O O W O N N
R
NNN M N N N N O m M�� O.ti N�
01 01 01 01 T 0\ S a\ .ti .y Of M M M t0 � Vl
Q<? Q C R< V C P C C< Nct M1
W W W W W W W W 0
M Q
ti W N O NN tiN
CC) Nse— N7
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Interfund Transfers
DATE: January 20, 1988
Introduction
Request Council approve of the following interfund transfers. They have
been made inaccordance with the budget and previous Council action unless other
wise noted. The transfers are for 1987.
Background
The detail of the transfers is;
From Tax Increment Trust to HRA for admin fees $179,580.00.
From Tax Increment Trust to General Fund for admin fees, $364,000.
From Tax Increment Trust to Debt Service Fund 32, $280,000.00
From Tax Increment Trust to Debt Service Fund 34, $113,000.00
From General Fund to Community Recreation - annual contribution -
$48,150.00.
From Sewer Fund to Special Assessment Debt Service - final share of Holmes
trunk line project $15,543.00.
From Sewer Fund to Sewer Debt Service $20,000.00.
From General Fund to Capital Improvement Fund, General Fund fund balance
for miscellaneous project funding or for City Hall, $296,000.00.
From Capital Equipment Fund to General Fund for equipment per attached
list, $98,329.59.
From Special Assessment Fund 49 1975 Improvement to Capital Improvement
Fund, any remaining assets in order to close the fund, $35,024.27.
Action Requested
Move to approve the transfer:
From Tax Increment Trust to HRA for admin fees $179,580.00.
From Tax Increment Trust to General Fund for admin fees, $364,000.
From Tax Increment Trust to Debt Service Fund 32, $280,000.00
From Tax Increment Trust to Debt Service Fund 34, $113,000.00
From General Fund to Community Recreation - annual contribution -
$45,150.00.
From Sewer Fund to Special Assessment Debt Service - final share of Holmes
trunk line project $15,543.00.
From Sewer Operating Fund to Sewer Debt Service $20,000.00.
From General Fund to Capital Improvement Fund, General Fund fund balance
for miscellaneous project funding or for City Hall, $296,000.00.
From Capital Equipment Fund to General Fund for equipment per attached
list, $96,329.59.
From Special Assessment Fund 49 1975 Improvement to Capital Improvement
Fund, any remaining assets in order to close the fund, $35,024.27.
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg VOxland, Finance Director
RE: Interfund Transfers
DATE: January 12, 1988
To the General Fund
From Capital Equipment for equipment purchases
Finance Dept
Printer Logis
Printer Quannon
3 Workstations Quannon
Fire Dept
Hose
Hose
Hose Wye
Compressor wiring
Street Dept
Dump Truck
Dump Truck plows
Dump Truck propane
Dump Truck sander
Dump Truck rustproof
Dump Truck title
Dump Truck spare
Dump Truck material
Snow blower
Conway
Conway
Conway
Redfield
Boyer
Boyum
Garb & Turbo
Ruffridge Johnson
Ziebart
Petty cash
Brad Ragan
Sam Bloom
Ruffridge Johnson
2,479.19
350.00
4,800.00
2,798.50
7,500.00
1,673.00
357.00
29,249.00
8,550.00
826.72
1,350.00
95.00
20.25
182.93
418.00
37,680.00
$98,329.59
III
CoN SZ NT ii.
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Deferred Compensation Plan
DATE: January 26, 1988
Introduction
The deferred compensation plan utilizing IDS investment option is not a
qualified plan according to the IRS.
Background
It has come to light that the IDS deferred compensation plan is not a
qualified plan according to the IRS. The latest document in the file is from
1975 which is a letter from the IRS stating that the plan is deficient in a
couple of areas. Also, there is a more current version of the IDS plan that we
do not have.
A poll of the Council was taken last week and with their approval I have
proceeded with contracting with Delloitte, Haskins and Sells to update the
plan. This is in conjunction with SPUC, Egan and Chaska. The cost is expected
to be about $750.00
Action Requested
Move to authorize the use of Delloitte, Haskins and Sells to update the
IDS Deferred Compensation Plan at an estimated cost of $750.00.
CoNSeNT ll.��,
MEMO TO: City Council
FROM: LeRoy Houser, Building Official
RE: Temporary Electrical Inspector
DATE: January 28, 1988
John Wagner is under contract with the City to do electrical
inspections.
BACKGROUND
Recently, John underwent hip replacement surgery and believes he
will be disabled for about six months. Consequently, we need to
contract with a temporary electrical inspector. John has
suggested we contract with Terry Krominga who is a state
inspector.
1. Authorize a temporary electrical contract with Terry
Krominga.
2. Find someone else to contract with for the needed
inspections.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend we authorize a temporary electrical contract with
Terry Krominga for a period of six months.
ACTION REQUESTED
Authorize the proper city officials to execute a temporary
electrical contract with Terry Krominga for a period of six
months.
LH:cah
Attachment
*ar
CONTRACT FOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS I ^'
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Terry Krominga, Box 91, LeSueur, MN 56058, is hereby
appointed a temporary electrical inspector for the City of
Shakopee to serve at the pleasure of the City Council for a
--periodof six months.
The City of Shakopee acknowledges receipt of his electrical
inspector's bond in the amount of $1,000 payable to the City of
Shakopee in case of default.
As such inspector, he hereby agrees to enforce the Minnesota
Electrical Act, the Rules and Regulations of the State Board of
Electricity thereunder and the appropriate Ordinances of the City
of Shakopee, as pertaining to the licensing of electricians and
inspection of electrical installations. The rate of compensation
for his services shall be 808 of the electrical inspection fees
collected by the City of Shakopee.
In addition to any other rules, regulations or directives
promulgated or issued under authority of the City of Shakopee, he
hereby agrees to comply with the following rules:
1. Report to this office when called upon.
2. Supply the City of Shakopee with a verification of
automobile liability insurance on Form 1927 of the
amounts of not less than $50,000 for any one per-
son, $100,000 for any one accident for personal
injury and $10,000 for property damage.
3. Supply a monthly report of inspection completed.
(Payment shall not exceed percentage or work
completed).
9. Deposit with the City of Shakopee any inspection
fees received in the field.
5. Delegate authority and responsibilities to no one
except duly authorized representatives of this
office upon request.
6. Keep a Journeyman or Master electrician's license
in force at all times.
By this appointment, the City of Shakopee places trust and
authority upon- Terry Krominga as an independent contractor
qualified and certified as such to make electrical inspections in .
behalf of the City of Shakopee in the geographical area defined
by the City's corporate limits.
t
This appointment shall terminate on July 31, 1988, unless
amended or withdrawn previous to that date by the City of
Shakopee or its duly authorized agents, or which shall terminate
upon 30 days written notice by Terry Krominga requesting same.
Approved by the Shakopee City Council this day of
198
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Terry Krominga
Present Address
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
City Adm., John K. Anderson
City, State, Zip - City Clerk, Judith S. Cox
//1
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson
FROM: Steve Hurley, MIS Coordinator
SUBJECT: Hard Disk and RAM Upgrade to Network
DATE: 1/28/88
INTRODUCTION:
The Computer Committee met 1/28/88 and concurred that it is
necessary to upgrade our network system by the addition of hard
disk and RAM (Random Access Memory).
BACKGROUND:
We currently have approximately 208 of usable disk space
remaining on our network hard disk. More importantly we have
allocated all but 128 of directories available.
It is necessary to add hard disk for increased storage and RAM
for additional speed particularly when accessing our growing
databases.
By adding 80 megabytes of disk storage and 1.5 megabytes of RAM
the system should have sufficient capacity to last 2-3 years
barring any unforseen circumstances. The potential hard disk
capacity of our system is approximately 400 megabytes. Even
moving our financial/payroll software and data from LOGIS to in-
house would take less than 4 megabytes. -
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Proceed with purchase of network upgrade items..
2. Do Nothing.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Select Alternate Number 1. Authorize purchase of Seagate 80
megabyte hard disk drive with installation for $1700.00 and 1 1/2
megabytes of RAM with installation for $350. Computer Capital
Equipment fund has $10,000 budgeted for 1988.
REQUESTED ACTION:
Move to authorize purchase of one (1) Seagate 80 megabyte hard
disk drive and 1 1/2 megabytes of RAM for a total of $2,050.00
from Quannon Computer Products, funds to come from Computer
Capital Equipment fund for 1988.
SH/pmp
DISK
^ MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Appointments to Boards and Commissions
DATE: January 27, 1988
Introduction
Nominations have been made to various boards and commissions to
fill terms expiring January 31, 1988. Appointments by Council
are now in order.
Background
Terms on various boards and commissions are expiring on January
31st. If appointments are made at the February 2, 1988 Council
meeting, these appointees can be seated at February meetings.
The Planning Commission will be meeting this Thursday which will
give new appointees short notice to prepare for the meeting. The
Planning Commission has recommended that the new appointments
become effective after the February 4th Planning Commission
meeting:.. They also requested that those who are appointed
Tuesday be provided agenda packets for the meeting on the 4th and
that they attend and observe the meeting.
Appointments to other boards and commissions will become
effective immediately (except SPDC). There is sufficient time
between the appointments and the first meetings for appointees to
receive an agenda packet and become familiar with the material
prior to the meetings.
Because some individuals have indicated that they would be
willing to serve on a second or third choice board/commission,
separate ballots have been prepared so that if elected to one,
their name can be taken off another. Extra ballots are also
provided for run-off balloting, if necessary.
To expedite the balloting, I recommend that the first ballot be
completed early on in the Council meeting so that the ballots can
be tallied before the appointments come up on the agenda.
No balloting is necessary where there is only one candidate for
an opening.
Nominees Action Recommended
/ I.
Move to appoint to the
Planning Commission/Board of
Adjustment and Appeals for an unexpired
Eugene Allen (1)
term beginning February 8, 1988
R. Gene Foudray
and expiring January 31, 1991. (Todd
Schwartz's term)
Melanie Kahleck (1)
Barbara Prudoehl (1) 2.
�
Move to appoint and
Clifford Stafford
to the Planning Commission/Board of
Adjustment and Appeals for a four year
term beginning February 8, 1988 and
expiring January 31, 1992.
Virgil Mears 3.
Dallas Peterson
Move to appoint to the Police
Civil Service Commission for a three
year term expiring January 31, 1991.
Eugene Allen (2) 4.
Move to appoint to the
Barry Kirchmeier
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
beginning April 1, 1988 for a three
year term expiring April 30, 1991.
Move to appoint to the
Energy and Transportation Committee
Eugene Allen (3) \
for an unexpired term ending January
31, 1990.
Melanie Kahleck (2) )
(Jim Weeks' term)
Barbara Prudoehl (2) 6.
Move to appoint
Robert Ziegler
and (if candidates
remaining) to the Energy and
Transportation Committee for a three
year term expiring January 31, 1991.
Larry Moonen 7.
Move to appoint Larry Moonen to the
Cable Communications Advisory Commission
for a three year term expiring January
31, 1991.
Laura Wermerskirchen 8.
Move to appoint Laura Wermerskirchen to
Shakopee Community Recreation Board
for a two year term expiring January 31,
1990.
Robert Jaspers 9.
Gene Juergens
Move to appointand
Bob Turek
to the Housing Advisoy and
Board for a three yearterm expiring
January 31, 1991.
Robert Jaspers 10.
Gene Juergensto
Move to appoint
'Code
Bob Turek
the Building Board ofdAdjustment
and Appeals for a three year term
expiring January 31, 1991.
Sheila Carlson - 11. Move to appoint
Tim Keane and
to the Community Development Commission
Donald Koopmann for a three year term expiring January
31, 1991.
Sheila Carlson 12. Move to appoint Sheila Carlson to the
Ad Hoc Downtown Committee - if not
appointed to CDC.
JSC/jms
FIRST BALLOT BALLOT I1 J
Planning Commission Shakopee Public Utilities Comm.
(vote for 3) (vote for 1)
Eugene Allen (his 1st choice) Eugene Allen (his 2nd
R. Gene Foudray choice)
Melanie Kahleck Barry Kirchmeichch
Barbara S. Prudoehl (her 1st choice)
er
Clifford D. Stafford
Police Civil Service Commission
(vote for 1)
Virgil Mears
Dallas Peterson
Housing Advisory and Appeals Board
(vote for 2)
_ Robert Jaspers
Gene Juergens
Bob Turek
Building Code Board of Adjustment
and Appeals
(vote for 2)
_ Robert Jaspers
_ Gene Juergens
Bob Turek
Community Development Commission
(vote for 2)
_ Sheila Carslon
Tim Keane
Donald Koopmann
BALLOT
Board or Commission
APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
We welcome you as a possible applicant for one Of our City Boards
and/or Commissions.
What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards
and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non
residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you
must have an interest in serving your community.
The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically
have from one to two meetings per month, as follows:
Planning Commission/Board of 1st Thursday after 1st Tuesday
Adjustments and Appeals _ at 7:30 p.m.
Community Development Commission
Energy & Transportation Committee
Ad HOC Downtown Committee
Cable Communication Commissions
Housing Advisory and Appeals Board
Building Code Board Of Adjustment
& Appeals
2nd Wednesday at 5:00 p.m.
3rd Thursday at 7:00 p.m.
As Needed Wednesday at 7:30a.m.
As Needed Monday at 7:30 p.m.
As Needed
As Needed
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 1st Mondav at 4:30 p.m.
Shakopee Community Recreation 3rd Monday at 7:00 p.m.
Police Civil Service Commission As Needed
N : aaid W. p -e&, $' ss { to
R/:
Name: :Fihe 4°_ N%L�
Address-
Phone: (H) (B)
How Long Have you Been A Resident of Shakopee?if
� /J
Occupation: n 3 I vC_ SSx($?� yjkr/ b—AV
Does your Work Require You To -Travel? (check one)
A Great Deal Periodically Very Little _ Not At All
Do you Have Any Special Interests or Training Which You Feel A
Particular Boyyd_ oy Cgmmissipp Could_ Ute? (Use separate _she?_ if
Board or Commission In Which You Are Interested?
Please State Briefly why You Are Interested In Serving Or, this
Board/Commission For which You Are Submitting An Application:
CliLLcC� LLL Q'G'(�GEZeQiQ— _ �L'G""= �'U
isr7rZry:J�L itt /-Etbi,�r%,FiLG�L2 - lL � � t�'��_�![%(✓�""'t
Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any activity,
recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could
have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or
indirect.
In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable
interest in any business, however organized(/ which could be construed
as a conflict of interest? Yes No If yes, please provide
details on a separate sheet of paper.
In accordance with this definition, do you own any real property
located in Scott County in which you have a legal or equitable interest
which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes No X
If yes, please provide details on a separate sheet of paper.
Please L���i��ys" Three References (Na�m/e,� Address and Phone):
1.
pf-
2.� llu.<Y�— 495--
3. %��*•c�caie�c. �'�` c� 995
I hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
X11 f
i -i at .re FETIURN APPLICATION AND
PL=DEE TO:
/ City Clerk
City of Shakopee
Dade 129 East =irsz Avenue
Shakopee, 10 55379
445-3650
DA^_'i R7CLIVZD: - -
APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS
,
City of Shakopee It
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City Boards
and/or Commissions.
What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards
and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non
residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you
must have an interest in serving your community.
The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically
have from one to two meetings per month, as follows:
Plannirg_Comvniss-ion/Hoard of 1st Thursday after 1st Tuesday
Aaj ustments and Appeals -- --- ---- at 7:30 p.m.
Community Development Commission 2nd Wednesday at 5:00 p.m.
Energy & Transportation Committee 3rd Thursday at 7:00 p.m.
Ad HOC Downtown Committee As Needed Wednesday at 7:30a.m.
Cable Communication Commissions As Needed Monday at 7:30 p.m.
Housing Advisory and Appeals Board As Needed
Building Code Board of Adjustment As Needed
& Appeals
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 1st Monday at 4:30 p.m.
Shakopee Community Recreation 3rd Monday at 7:00 p.m.
Police Civil
l Service Commission - As Needed
Name:DWRA VVEKMET3LRCHEN Address: I099 SO. MO NRnE
Phone: (H) -445-535C) (B) 4q5- 33F7
How Long Have you Been A Resident of Shakopee? 7 q r.S
Occupation:_ elemen+nr4. +eachee
Does Your Work Require You To Travel? (check one)
A Great Deal Periodically Very Little Y- Not At Al!
Do You Have Any Special interests or Training Which You Feel A
Particular Board or _Commission Could .Use? (Use separate sheet if
Comrnu N r¢crm nn nrngrniwt
Board or Commission In Which You Are Interested?_tiph M U Y'�="�
LLC?'x.k on
Please State Briefly Why You Are Interested In Serving on this
Board/Commission For Which You Are Submitting An Application:
WAS rer4-1ii Qpr7�intT ed h QL. VCOCQI1c�) 9 WOUlcJ
per vlY1U (JAS GI'1 �lU(.`Ar fDr +h& ornr e�.
Conflict f interest is defined as a participation_ in -any activity,_
recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could
have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or
indirect.
In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable
interest in any business, however organized, which could be construed
as a conflict of interest? Yes No If yes, please provide
details on a separate sheet of paper.
In accordance with this definition, do you own any real property
located in Scott County in which you have a legal or equitable interest
which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes No I�
If yes, please provide details on a separate sheet of paper.
Please List Three References (Name, Address and Phone):
1
I hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
1-5-98
Date
DATE RECEIVED:
R -"-URN APPLICATION AND
n- EDGE TO:
City Clerk
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
445-3650
APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
/I A
We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City Boards
and/or Commissions.
What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards
and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non
residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you
must have an interest in serving your community.
The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically
have from one to two meetings per month, as follows:
Planning Commission/Board of
Adjustments and Appeals
Community Development Commission
Energy & Transportation Committee
Ad BOC Downtown Committee
Cable Communication Commissions
Housing Advisory and Appeals Board
Buildinc Code Board of Adjustment
& Appeals
1st Thursday after 1st Tuesday
at 7:30 p.m.
2nd Wednesday at 5:00 p.m.
3rd Thursday at 7:00 p.m.
As Needed Wednesday at 7:30a.m.
As Needed Monday at 7:30 p.m.
As Needed
As Needed
Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission
1st
Monday
at
4:30
p.m.
Shakopee
Community Recreation
3rd
Monday
at
7:00
p.m.
Police Civil Service Commission As Needed
Name: Z g,r., a Address:
Phone: (H) YN5-9.267 (B) ffidt7 2267
How Long Have you Been A {{Resident of Shakopee?
OY%I
OccuDation: . .�an..a � 19�-.w eni ,
Does Your Work-Recuire You To Travel? (check one)
A Great Deal Periodically _� Very Little Not At All
Do You Have Any Special interests or Training Which You Feel A
Particular Board or Commission -Could Use? (Use separate sheet it
necessary) /--o
ri4 fi al' , //y w �� fl+e G6M MiJJiOf
Board or Commission In Which You Are Interested?
Please State Briefly Why You Are Interested In Serving On this
Board/Commission For which You Are Submitting An Application:
f<ii 6s iin�w f' n�/h4f"`i Sls�'LniO nw®
Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any activity,
recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could
have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or
indirect.
In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable
interest in any business, however organized, which could be construed
as a conflict of interest? Yes No I£ yes, please provide
details on a separate sheet of paper.
In accordance with this definition, do you own any real property
located in Scott County in which you have a lecal or equitable interest
which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes No ✓
If yes, please provide details on a separate sheet of paper.
Please List Three References (Name, Address and Phone):
2
3. %iln r4a,✓P
I hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
s4hature RETURN APPLICATION AND
PLEDGE TO:
/ p D
City Clerk
City o_ Shakopee
Date 129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, M1d 55379
445-3650
DATE RECEIVED:
APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS it f
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City Boards
and/or Commissions.
What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards
and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non
residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you
must have an interest in serving your community.
The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically
have from one to two meetings per month, as follows:
Planning Commission/Board of
Adjustments and Appeals -
Community Development Commission
Energy & Transportation Committee
Ad HOC Downtown Committee
Cable Communication Commissions
Housing Advisory and Appeals Board
Building Code Board of Adjustment
&
AD
pezls
lst Thursday after lst Tuesday
at. 7:30 p.m.
2nd Wednesday at 5:00 p.m.
3rd Thursday at 7:00 p.m.
As Needed Wednesday at 7:30a.m.
As Needed Monday at 7:30 p.m.
As Needed
As Needed
Shakopee PublicUtilitiesCommission 1st Monday at 9:30 p.m.
Shakopee Community Recreation 3rd Monday at 7:00 p.m.
Police Civil Service Commission As Needed
Name: Are Qf '%oi 61-t. Address:
Phone: (H) -13 5 5 (B) �A
- How Long Have you Been A Resident of Shakopee?
SL�L li
/ y -E
Occupation: £_S s PRf 5FAr�A7114F
Does Your Work Require You To Travel? (check -one)
A Great Deal / Periodically _ Very Little _ Not At All
Do You Have
Any Special Interests or
Training
Which You Feel A
Particular
Board or Commission Could
Use? (Use
separate sheet if
necessary)
/v 1)6t3 -re 1Az- b°In£0 SALES
Za?mCR
Board or commission In Which You Are
Please State Briefly Why You Are Interested In Serving On this
Board/Commission For Which You Are Sfitting An Application:
uu/��mm
e,A 1311 c fel cc f s S
Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any activity,
recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could
have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or
indirect.
In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable
interest in any business, however organized, which could be construed
as a conflict of interest? Yes No Li If yes, please provide
details on a separate sheet of paper.
In accordance with this definition, do you own any real property
located in Scott County in which you have a lecal or equitable interest
which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes No
if yes, please provide details on a separate sheet of paper.
Please List Three(Zeferences (Name, Address and Phone):
1. *3A& �j Jr 6,K
2. L51 LL /u ZS zs, (
3. .4 \'�
I hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are
-true and cor to the best of my knowledge.
x `
Si n re RETURN APPLICATION AND
PLEDGE TO:
i City Clerk
City of Shakopee
Date 129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MIN 55379
445-3650
DATE, RECEIVED:
—� APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS
I cJ
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City Boards
and/or Commissions.
What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards
and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non
residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you
must have an interest in serving your community.
The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically
have from one to two meetings per month, as follows:
Planning Commission/Board of
Adjustments and Appeals
Community Development Commission
Energy & Transportation Committee
Ad HOC Downtown Committee
Cable Communication Commissions
Housing Advisory and Appeals Board
Building Code Board of Adjustment
& Appeals
1st Thursday after 1st Tuesday
at 7:30 p.m.
2nd Wednesday at 5:00 p.m.
3rd Thursday at 7:00 p.m.
As Needed Wednesday at 7:30a.m.
As Needed Monday at 7:30 p.m.
As Needed
As Needed
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 1st Monday at 4:30 p.m.
Shakopee Community Recreation 3rd Monday at 7:00 p.m.
Police Civil Service Commission As Needed
Name:�J �Lf�-��/US Address: �Jl
Phone: (H) TT -S �� (B) 15-1aKVC
How Long Have you Been A Resident of Shakopee?
Occupation: e5 �I
Does Your Work Require You To Travel? (check one)
A Great Deal Periodically Very Little Not At All
Do You Have Any
Particular Board
necessary)
Special interests or Training Which You Feel A
or Commission Could Use? (Use separate sheet if
Board or Commission In Which You Are Interested?
Please State Briefly Why You Are Interested In Serving on this
Hoard/Commission /For Which You Are Submitting An Application:
ei' %c
Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any activity,
recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could
have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or
indirect.
In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable
interest in any business, however organized, which could be construed
as a conflict of interest? Yes No X If yes, please provide
details on a separate sheet of paper.
In accordance with this definition, do you own any real property
located in Scott County in which you have a legal or equitable intP}rq�st
which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes No X
If yes, please provide details on a separate sheet of paper.
Please List Three References (Name, Address and Phone):
3
9
I hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are
true and co t to the best of my knowledge.
�w
$ gnature RETURN APPLICATION AND
PLEDGE TO:
�1 City Clerk
City of Shakopee
Date 129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
445-3650
DATE RECEIVED:
—' APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS
I)
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City Boards
and/or Commissions.
What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards
and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non
residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you
must have an interest in serving your community.
The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically
have from one to two meetings per month, as follows:
Planning Commission/Board of
Adjustments and Appeals
Community Development Commission
Energy & Transportation Committee
Ad HOC Downtown Committee
1st Thursday after 1st Tuesday
at 7:30 p.m.
2nd Wednesday at 5:00 P.M.
3rd Thursday at 7:00 P.M.
As Needed Wednesday at 7:30a.m.
Cable Communication Commissions As Needed Monday at 7:30 p.m.
JHousing Advisory and Appeals Board As Needed
JBuilding Code Board of Adjustment As Needed
& Appeals
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 1st Monday at 9:30 p.m.
Shakopee Community Recreation 3rd Monday at 7:00 p.m.
Police Civil Service Commission As Needed
Name:�obe,Sr SSRs �'eR Address: Q7,5- 7 -)!Lel,' 67 -
Phone: (H) L/NS—/R 7-% (B)
How Long Have you Been A Resident of Shakopee? 7 �d_�EAiiS
Occupation: J-4s,021j i40 HtFS Ale w. Coi, srAaC—,00.J—i3C!%OtLi A -
Does Your Work Require You To Travel? (check one) �/
A Great Deal _ Periodically Very Little X Not At All
Do You Have Any
Particular Board
necessary)
Special Interests or Training Which You Feel A
or Commission Could Use? (Use separate sheet if
Board or Commission In Which You Are Interested? (.jam„�S ;e/G FDO,`Soty
igdD (i�/Jl'D F Rn rrlel> APPe6l..i
Please State Briefly why You Are Interested In Serving On this
Board/Commission For which You Are Submitting An Application:
Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any activity,
recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could
have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or
indirect.
In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable
interest in any business, however organized, which could be construed
as a conflict of interest? Yes No �_ If yes, please provide
details on a separate sheet of paper.
In accordance with this definition, do you own any real property
located in Scott County in which you have a legal or equitable interest
which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes No X
If yes, please provide details on a separate sheet of paper.
Please List Three References (Name, Address and Phone):
1.
2.
3.
I he4by certify that the facts within the foregoing application are
true a,r�l cprrect to the best of my knowledge.
,lA/✓ 8 > y RFs
Date
DATE RECEIVED:
RETURN APPLICATION AND
PLEDGE TO:
City Clerk
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
445-3650
- 11850 WLLEN SNEEi '
S KOPEE MNn 79 ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS
&1 )I J
S 1512).0 151
� aes 1elz�asa152s
:ity of Shakopee
East First Avenue
SCOTT SHIELA A. CARLSON pee, Minnesota 55379
REAL ESTATE
ossible applicant for one of our City Boards
What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards
and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non
residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you
must have an interest in serving your community.
The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically
have from one to two meetings per month, as follows:
Planning Commission/Board of 1st Thurs6ay after 1st Tuesday
Adjustments and Appeals at 7:30 p.m.
Community Development Commission 2nd Wednesday at 5:00 p.m.
Energy & Transportation Committee 3rd Thursday at 7:00 p.m.
Ad HOC Downtown Committee- - - As Needed Wednesday at 7:30a.m.
Cable Communication commissions As Needed Monday at 7:30 p.m. .
Housing Advisory and Appeals Board As Needed
Building Code Board of Adjustment As Needed
& Appeais
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 1st Monday at 4:30 p.m.
Shakopee Community Recreation 3rd Monday at 7:00 p.m.
Police Civil Service Commission As Needed 1545/ntyb:
['AR
(11850Fulle-'71
Name: �I9121 A li l'1+K1.50MI. Address: ZSlnl 1410huiew) i rr((P 5110kOdea, 0n
Phone: (H) 45U-139 ls) 4418151
w�am1 y111✓lYK5�t4
How Long Have you Been A Resident of
Occupation:
Does Your work Require You To Travel? (check one)
_ A Great Deal Periodically Very Little ✓ Not At All
Do You Have Any Special Interests or Training which You Feel A
Particular Board o; Comm g}n Could Us (Use separate sheet it
necessary) N/Grh Ill IP51(JGCttal IPQ/ PSE/r bUymtOSS
Board or Commission
In Which You
Are Interested?
&-(PMVih-
�5�'�}�('i(���1:"Y;1ih"•I{y
�i.l�t��b(}11U���!$'Y1I141'filA✓1
2.
1ia,.NFIlY � Luja7h
��
llittlwftj'-1 0,4m
&""PpNrss
""5-Z742
(v(t ert"1
3.
Please State Briefly
Board/Commission For
Why You Are Interested
Which You Are Submitting An
In Serving On this
Application:
+Dwo rind tib deed pm
ea I � oda ld a(ur we , P, P ly be 1n&,1,,d
J
is uerineejLs- the participatiod ' in any activity,
recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could
have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or
indirect.
In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable
interest in any business, however organized, which could be construed
as a conflict of interest? Yes No I/ If yes, please provide
details on a separate sheet of paper.
In accordance with this definition, do you own any real property
located in Scott County in which you have a legal or equitable interest
which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes No ✓
If yes, please provide details on a separate sheet of paper.
Please List Three References (Name, Address and Phone):
1._$ruN
"ArKi'5DA4
�83iLA&n
&-(PMVih-
u4K32dZ
(VQC-G18'w,)
2.
f1m kc4,av
- St -r uvn
&""PpNrss
""5-Z742
(v(t ert"1
3.
IFC ()Chun;-Pellil',nr
OP (G'
w'(i EAnUr) nl.p[!5
Si rFlLL
k31--IIZz
I hereby certify that thefacts within the foregoing application are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
� )IiAGGL�
�.
GA/LCL�C%
Signature -
RETURN APPLICATION AND
PLEDGE TO:
!
City Clerk
City of Shakopee
Date
_
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
995-3650
RECEIVED
DATE RECEIVED:
DEC2 4'1987
cjTY OF sHAKOPEE
APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS '
If J
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City Boards
and/or Commissions. -
What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards
and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non
residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you
must have an interest in serving your community.
The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically
have from one to two meetings per month, as follows:
Planning Commission/Board of
Adjustments and Appeals
Community Development Commission
Energy & Transportation Committee
Ad HOC Downtown Committee
Cable Communication Commissions
Housing Advisory and Appeals Board
Building Code Board of Adjustment
& Appeals _
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
Shakopee Community Recreation
Police Civil Service Commission
1st Thursday after 1st Tuesday
at 7:30 p.m.
2nd Wednesday at 5:00 p.m.
3rd Thursday at 7:00 p.m.
As Needed Wednesday at 7:30a.m.
As Needed Monday at 7:30 p.m.
As Needed
As Needed
1st Monday at 4:30 p.m.
3rd Monday at 7:00 p.m.
As Needed
Name: r. -r Address: —//9M17n�nsreso S+.
Phone: (H) — /50 (B) LlL/� 41RR'q Kra w
How Long Have �you Been A Resident of Shakopee? rC .
Occupation:
Does Your Work- Re_qui_r_e You To Travel? (check one)
A Great Deal Periodically Very Little Al Not At All
Do You Have Any
Special Interests or
Training
Which You Feel A
Particular Board
or Commission Coulccyy
Use? (Use
separate sheet if
necessary) � i
k q -t
rs ) )c'mhr�r
— CPU
r
' Board or Commission In Which You Are Interested? S r- u c -
Please State Briefly Why You Are Interested In Serving On this
Board/Commission For which You Are
Submitting An Application:
%O onlinu -4c Opp A n rY Spur in rh r-4rnng y-14
esc god/S.
rC&SbnaNP r'nr4 eq";4th- P/ -4-7/L.a 4t-, Ya4C rha n4ain.
an_eV'C:e14. (YeLenAaMp, jn,f r,n P.Ll,_ it -4J-4..
- _-k,
recommended action, or decision from
have the potential to receive personal
indirect.
�r� �� h n ars
participatio in any activity,
ich the individual has or could
gain, whether it be direct or
In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable
interest in any business, however organized, hich could be construed
as a conflict of interest? Yes No If yes, please provide
details on a separate sheet of paper.
In accordance with this definition, do you own any real property
located in Scott County in which you have a legal or equitable ir. a est
which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes No
If yes, please provide details -ona separate sheet of paper.
Please List Three References (Name, Address and Phone): ---
I. Dr. C-�&Jc-n C rru4k 50.5 S Njm(-c 4y�-- S'88l
7
3
I hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature
Dec. ) oi7c1g
Date
DATE RECEIVED:
RETURN APPLICATION AND
PLEDGE TO:
City Clerk
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
445-3650
f
f
APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS �' J
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City Boards
and/or Commissions.
what are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards
and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non
residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you
must have an interest in serving your community.
The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically
have from one to two meetings per month, as follows:
Planning Commission/Board of
Adjustments and Appeals
Community Development Commission
Energy & Transportation Committee
Ad HOC Downtown Committee
Cable Communication Commissions
Housing Advisory and Appeals Board
Building Code Board of Adjustment
& Appeals
1st Thursday after "1st Tuesday
at 7:30 p.m.
2nd Wednesday at 5:00 p.m.
3rd Thursday at 7:00 P.M.
As Needed Wednesday at 7:30a.m.
As Needed Monday at 7:30 p.m.
As Needed
As Needed
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 1st Monday at 4:30 p.m.
Shakopee Community Recreation 3rd Monday at 7:00 P.M.
Police Civil Service Commission - As Needed
Name:
dtogN Jyi //!41Q0,64X
Address:
JNRKO,0fE4i
Phone:
(H) 9'45-2A51
(B) /.3G -/8/O
How Long Have you Been A Resident of Shakopee?
occupation:
Does Your Work Require You To Travel? (check one)
A Great Deal Periodically _ Very Little _ Not At All
Do You Have Any Special Interests or Training Which You Feel A
Par`__cular Board or Commission Could Use? (Use separate sheet if
necessary) 11
Board or Commission In Which You Are Interested?
Please State Briefly why You Are Interested In Serving On this
Board/ ommission For which You Are Submitting An /Application:
,d eAAIM7.W6 iiT— zl, /i/iii t iii11,1111-
Conflict
s,✓,.1.
Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any activity,
recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could
have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or
indirect.
In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable
interest in any business, however organized, Which could be construed
as a conflict of interest? Yes No k� If yes, please provide
details on a separate sheet of paper.
In accordance with this definition, do you own any real property
located in Scott County in which you have a legal or equitable inter
which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes No
If yes, please provide details on a separate sheet of paper.
Please Listp Three References (Name, Address �and Phone):
2. f e%f{fNL — �icc OrCEi✓ — /v �D C//
3. �,Q f.O �IEG%Lf✓- !/fdL �4� UsFrLs - li!
I hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are
true nd correct to the best of my knowledge.
11� �sGL�yn
Sigrat RETURN APPLICATION AND
PLEDGE TO:
DATE RECEIVED:
City Clerk
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
445-3650
i.2PLI OF.=ION FOR COLT: C=; FJV:SOR_ BC;ARDS ;UND/CR 03^2__SB_ONS
City of Shakcpee
129 Zast First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota E.379
We welcome You as a possible applicant fcr one of our City Boards
and/or Commissions.
What are the cualificaticns for se_vin❑ en thesecviscry Boards
and Commissions? You mus; be a resident c= Shakopee, ecoeot witere ncn
residency is permitted by Council resolu-l=, and more imp^rtantly, You
must have an interest in serving your cormu.nity.
The Boards and Commissions meet during the ever. -J. -.g and tN-pica'-ly
have from one to two meetings per month, as follows: -
Planning Commission/Board of 1st Thursdav after Ist Tuesday
Adj-ustments and Appeals at 7:30 ��..
Community Development Commission 2nd Wednesday at 5:00 p.m.
BnercY & Transportation Committee --rd Thursday at 7:00 o.n.
Ad 10C Downtown Committee As Needed Weanesdav at 7:30a.m.
Cable Communication Commissicns ks Needed Mc.aay at 7:30 p.m.
Housing Advisory and Appeals Board As Needed
Building Code Board cf Adjustment P.s Needed
&weals
Shakopee 2L'blic Utilities Cc.=.i s_'.on 1st at 5:30 P.M. -
Community Recreaticn ere M-ndav at 7:00 t.m.
=..__ce Civil Service COT.i-s44cn As Needed
N -=e: V, t (.I n, &O� 3 ._tress: /b/3 e' 6''�i�MeAi
How Lang Have you.
Beeen A Res indent cf Shakcpee?
ration Y'�Hifn� 4:4791n
Does Your Werk Reacire You To =ravel? (check one)
Great Deal 11,� p____.,t_cal v VS=Y =_tt_- Not : t
DO YO -aVe Ai" Sne.._=_7ntereStS _ —ra=ining VniCh You Feel
Board Cr CO-'.'., -.. C. CO'___ (___ ___crate sheer
necessa=)
Board or Cc.^a:issicn _n Which You Are=nterested? 0Okro4r C%N/i SES.
?lease state Briefly - 'ayYou Are Interested In Serving On -..is
Board/C.. Session For Which You Fre s,a'._t.ing An Application:
A u
�ru.P Ont /7�to re �i m .
Cor.`lic- c'_ _..-_rest is de'_ined as :he Par-icita-ion in any a__iv4-v'
reccmmencei a_- _= cec_s_„n it 7 v..,-
--ch the individual has or weld
have the pctenc_a_ tc r_- persc a'_ rain, whether at be direct or
indirect.
In acccrdance wit:a -..-s d _nil_..- c you have any_ legal or erecta_
_-teres- fn an-,
_=.-._ze3 w ic, cvA be const uaa
as a Ctn=__..t c'Interest? Yes No ves, pleas=_ t=evide
details a separate sheet c'_ Paper.
to aCCOrGanCe '.._t] tn15 - co Cou C)Wnal _rcne__v
located in Scrt .,cu.-,ty in "n vcu have - legal cr ec�__teb_e _nt-rest
which could be ctts-rued ^
as - ....
a_tlict _ interest? Yerc t/
yes, please provide detez_scn a setarate sheet c'_p-Per.
'_ease list Three Re=erenoes (Name, Address and ?hone):
hereby --- --_ that _ .- ZE=ts wit`.', the -`-ea __g -__-a_ .... _ are
ccrrezz to tne nesz c` my knowledce. - --
/y 'ry
Date
DAT= ti:ce_t _D:
e=el-- _=
29 =_ _--__
4_s-3sso'
r
APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City Boards
and/or Commissions. -
What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards
and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non
residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you
must have an interest in serving your community.
The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically
have from one to two meetings per month, as follows:
Planning Commission/Board of
Adjustments and Appeals
Community Development Commission
Energy & Transportation Committee
Ad HOC Downtown Committee
Cable Communication Commissions
Housing Advisory and Appeals Board
Building Code Board of Adjustment
& Appeals
1st Thursday after 1st Tuesday
at 7:30 p.m.
2nd Wednesday at 5:00 p.m.�
3rd Thursday at 7:00 P.M.
As Needed Wednesday at 7:30a.m.
As Needed Monday at 7:30 p.m.
As Needed
As Needed
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 1st Monday at 4:30 p.m.'
Shakopee Community Recreation 3rd Monday at 7:00 p.m.
Police Civil Service Commission As Needed
Name: Lgqene= //). AAC/I Address:
Phone: (H) (B) 9Y/ -3/7.�
How Long Have you Been A Resident of Shakopee? 3 i .-
occupation: Mtec&l 12) Doe fions j{rnc ca 8�f'rt /fa cs or� wvr
Does Your Work Require You To Travel? (check one)
_ A Great Deal _Periodically Very Little _ Not At All
Do You Have Any Special Interests or Training Which You Feel A
Particular Board or Commission Could Use? (Use separate sheet if
necessary) Eyc j,2 If A '/—
..no /77an a4�/J��.../ eA Pe /f FE
eX,1;"bnte iR wbrk;.,g �f needs of 1e/, =, /e,ti�,^r.
Board or Commission In Which You Are Interested?
Y17" f,7 b joc a I, I,, t;,,.7 u. (f hk� tc 5/�y
Please State Briefly Why You Are Interested In Serving On this
Board/Commission For Which You Are Submitting An Application:
/n. JPT �,. �, u. T,I Lam- /1lL, GJ L/�. C'/p. •vv.
Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any activity,
recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could
have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or
indirect.
In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable
interest in any business, however organized,ich could be construed
as a conflict of interest? Yes No � If yes, please provide
details on a separate sheet of paper.
In accordance with this definition, do you own any real property
located in Scott County in which you have a legal or equitable intere
which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes No
If yes, please provide details on a separate sheet of paper.
Please List Three References (Name, Address and Phone):
1. JGh., iinOrisn.i 99f 5.,�f HYS-/LOy
2. lack '/9O
3. Venni5 R.+s LC /Oz/ 2- 7/`%'1
I hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
0/ �D0..'
Signature
lz/2,3/F7
Date
DATE RECEIVED:
RET?TRN APPLICATION AND
PLEDGE TO:
City Clerk
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
445-3650
' APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS
v 1
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City Boards
and/or Commissions.
What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards
and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non
residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you
must have an interest in serving your community.
The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically
have from one to two meetings per month, as follows:
Planning Commission/Board of
Adjustments and Appeals
Community Development Commission
Energy & Transportation Committee
Ad HOC Downtown Committee
1st Thursday after 1st Tuesday
at 7:30 p.m.
2nd Wednesday at 5:00 P.M.
3rd Thursday at 7:00 P.M.
As Needed Wednesday at 7:30a.m.
Cable Communication Commissions As Needed Monday at 7:30 p.m.
Housing Advisory and Appeals Board As Needed
Building Code Board of Adjustment As Needed
& Appeals
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 1st Monday at 9:30 P.M.
Shakopee Community Recreation 3rd Monday at 7:00 p.m.
Service Commission As Needed
Name: Ctin _ r t -4r Address:/4o 7 GUoeo DLA /�//�L
Phone: (H)V?-/;�,a3 (B)z7—?,L7/
How Long Have you Been A Resident of Shakopee? y O trf-%o
occupation: W o R /f C c, Q R 01'P ATO /3,Z L o C A16 EL aR
Does Your Work Require You To Travel? (check one)
_ A Great Deal _ Periodically _ Very Little Ll -'Not At All
Do You Have Any Special Interests or Training Which You Feel A
Particular Board or Commission Could Use? (Use tseparate� sheet if
necessary)
r
Board or Commission In Which You Are Interested?
Please State Briefly Why You Are Interested In Serving On this
Board/Commission For which You Are Submitting An Application:
2 e n ri ^ ba o Ti �t=J.o cR!C /a
o
Con ict o£ in Brest is defined as the participation in any activity,
recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could
have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or
indirect.
In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable
interest in any business, however organized, which could be construed
as a conflict of interest? Yes No L If yes, please provide
details on a separate sheet of paper.
In accordance with this definition, do you own any real property
located in Scott County in which you have a legal or equitable interest
which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes No 1�
If yes, please provide details on a separate sheet of paper.
Please List Three References (Name, Address and Phone):
I hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature
%'�,--)-3-57
Date
1,
DATE RECEIVED: Ja-a3 7bn,
- 199
RETURN APPLICATION AND
PLEDGE TO:
City Clerk
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
445-3650
APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS
City of Shakopee RECEIVED
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 DEC2 31987
We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of dIlY 'C2'ty— AaKt9gEc
and/or Commissions.
What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards
and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non
residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you
must have an interest in serving your community.
The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically
have from one to two meetings per month, as follows:
Planning Commission/Board of 1st Thursday after 1st Tuesday
Adjustments and Appeals at 7:30 p.m.
Community Development Commission
Energy & Transportation Committee
Ad HOC Downtown Committee
Cable Communication commissions
Housing Advisory and Appeals Board
Building Code Board of Adjustment
& Appeals
2nd Wednesday at 5:00 p.m.
3rd Thursday at 7:00 p.m.
As Needed Wednesday at 7:30a.m.
As Needed Monday at 7:30 p.m.
As Needed
As Needed
Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission
1st
Monday
at 4:30 p.m.
Shakopee
Community Recreation
3rd
Monday
at 7:00 P.M.
Police Civil Service Commission
As
Needed
Name: Melanie Rahleck
Address: 221 E. 1st Ave.
Phone: (H) 496-2830 (B) 445-5275
How Long Have you Been A Resident of Shakopee? 2 years (see attached)
Occupation: Signmaker--Owner of Signs of Quality
Does Your Work Require You To Travel? (check one)
A Great Deal Periodically x Very Little _ Not At All
Do You Have Any Special Interests or Training Which You Feel A
Particular Board or Commission Could Use? (Use separate sheet if
necessary)
Board or Commission In Which You Are Interested? (1) Planning Commission
(2) Energy 0 Transportation (one axx or the other)
Please State Briefly why You Are Interested In Serving On this
Board/Commission For Which You Are Submitting An Application:
I am concerned about efficiency in community managanent, both present and
future, and would be happy to serve on any of the city's boards or commissions.
I am a member of the Downtown Ad HOC Coussittee.
Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any activity,
` recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could
have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or
indirect.
In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable
interest in any business, however organized, which could be construed
as a conflict of interest? Yes No x If yes, please provide
details on a separate sheet of paper.
In accordance with this definition, do you own any real property
located in Scott County in which you have a legal or equitable interest
which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes No x
If yes, please provide details on a separate sheet of paper.
Please List Three References (Name, Address and Phone):
1,
Gary
Laurent
2415 Lakeview Dr.
445-6745
Rev,
Mary Keen
Calvary United
Methodist Church 445-2722
2.
3 Barry Stock Shakopee City Nall 445-3650
1 hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are
true and correct/ to the best of my knowledge.
M
-S
V Signature RETURN APPLICATION AND
PLEDGE TO:
12/23/87 City Clerk
City of Shakopee
Date 129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
445-3650
DATE RECEIVED:
• APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
We welcome you as a possible applicant for one of our City Boards
and/or Commissions.
What are the qualifications for serving on these advisory Boards
and Commissions? You must be a resident of Shakopee, except where non
residency is permitted by Council resolution, and more importantly, you
must have an interest in serving your community.
The Boards and Commissions meet during the evening and typically
have from one to two meetings per month, as follows:
Planning Commission/Board of
Adjustments and Appeals
Community Development Commission
Energy & Transportation Committee
Ad HOC Downtown Committee
Cable Communication Commissions
Housing Advisory and Appeals Board
Building Code Board of Adjustment
& Appeals
1st Thursday after 1st Tuesday
at 7:30 p.m.
2nd Wednesday at 5:00 P.M.
3rd Thursday at 7:00 p.m.
As Needed Wednesday at 7:30a.m.
As Needed Monday at 7:30 p.m.
As Needed
As Needed
Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission
1st
Monday
at
4:30
p.m.
Shakopee
Community Recreation
3rd
Monday
at
7:00
p.m.
Police Civil Service Commission As Needed
Name: Robert A Turek Address: 731 W 10th Ave, Sbakopee, Mn 55379
Phone: (H) 496-2059 (B) 887-9624
How Long Have you Been A Resident of Shakopee? 9 Months
Occupation: Property Appraiser (Certified Minn.Assessor) for the City of Blmgtn.
Does Your Work Require You To Travel? (check one)
A Great Deal Periodically _ Very Little x Not At All
Do You Have Any Special Interests or Training Which You Feel A
Particular Board or Commission Could Use? (Use separate sheet if
necessary) See Occupation Above. Also I have an Architectural Drafting
Board or Commission In Which You Are Interested? Building Code Board
nd/n. Roliging Advisory Roard,
Please State Briefly Why You Are Interested In Serving On this
Board/Commission For Which You Are Submitting An Application:
I believe that a community needs the help and input of its citizens to
operate in a manner that will be fair to those citizens. I would like to be a
part of this community involvement.
Conflict of interest is defined as the participation in any activity,
recommended action, or decision from which the individual has or could
have the potential to receive personal gain, whether it be direct or
indirect.
In accordance with this definition, do you have any legal or equitable
interest in any business, however organized, which could be construed
as a conflict of interest? Yes No X If yes, please provide
details on a separate sheet of paper. -- --- ----
In accordance with this definition, do you own any real property
located in Scott County in which you have a legal or equitable interest
which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes No %
If ves, please provide details on a separate sheet of paper.
Please List Three References (Name, Address and Phone):
1.
Allen
Bartvzal,
1033 S.
Main St. Shakopee Mn 55379
445-3111
2.
David
Kragthorpe
1017
Legion St Shakopee Mn 55379
445-5217
3.
Larry
Coulter
6108 W.
99th St. Blmgtn Mn 55438
831-7810
1 hereby certify that the facts within the foregoing application are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature
_ December 27, 1987
Date
DATE RECEIVED:
RETURN APPLICATION AND
PLEDGE TO:
City Clerk
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
445-3650
-1 -5, -FY
/iK
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk r/ -
RE: 1988 Liaison Appointments V
DATE: December 30, 1987
Introduction
The attached lists the Council liaison appointments made in 1987.
Council should consider and make appointments for 1988.
In addition a Councilmember should be appointed to serve as an
ex officio member on the Shakopee Valley Convention and Tourism
Bureau. The Bureau meets once a month on Tuesdays from 8:00 to
9:00 or 9:30 a.m.
Resolution No. 2667 adopted on December 16, 1986 provides that an
employee may request a hearing before an appeal committee. The
committee shall be comprised of two Councilmembers and the City
Attorney. The Councilmembers names shall be drawn by lot on a
case by case basis. There is no request for the establishment of
this committee at this time.
Action Requested
1. Appointment of Acting Mayor for 1988.
2. Make liaison appointments to:
Shakopee Community Services
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
Planning Commission
Purchasing Committee
Downtown Committee
Sewer Backup Claims Committee (3 members)
Shakopee Valley Convention and Tourism Bureau
JSC/jms
1967 COUNCIL LIAISON APPOINTMEL:S
Shakopee Community Services
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
Planning Commission
Hazardous Waste and Sewer Service Board
Purchasing Committee
Downtown Committee
Sewer Back-up Claims Committee
Vice Mayor
Appointments made 1/0/67
John Leroux
Jerry Wampach
Steve Clay
Gloria Vierling
Gloria Vierling
John Leroux
Jerry Wampach
Jerry Wampach
Steve Clay
Gloria Vierling
John Leroux
L�IIC
League of Minnesota Cities
January 22, 1988
MEMORANDUM
183 Universitv Ave. East
St. Paul, ALN 55101-2526
(612) 227.5600 (FAX: 221-0986)
TO: LMC Board of Directors
LMC Revenue Sources Committee
Property Tax Reform Coordinating Committee Members
FROM: Jim Miller, Chairman, .LMC Advisory Committee on Property
Tax Reform
RE: Advisory Committee's Comments on Property Tax Proposal
Developed by Property Tax Reform Coordinating Committee
After two months of reviewing and analyzing the proposal developed
by the Property Tax Reform Coordinating Committee, the Advisory
Committee would like to provide the LMC Board of Directors, Revenue
Sources Committee and Coordinating Committee members with its
comments on the reform plan.
Due to conflicting positions taken by the organizations on the
Advisory Committee, the Committee did not reach a consensus on
whether the League should endorse, oppose, or take no position on
the Coordinating Committee's plan. Nevertheless, this memorandum
will outline the various issues on which Advisory Committee members
agreed as well the issues on which Committee members disagreed. It
will also convey to you what position each individual organization
has thusfar taken on the proposal.
As you recall, the Advisory Committee is made up of members of four
organizations of cities not represented on the: Coordinating
Committee. Those four organizations include;
-- the Municipal Legislative Commission, represented by Shoreview
Mayor Richard Wedell and myself;
-- the Range Association of Municipalities and.School Districts,
represented by Keewatin MayorDanKelly and Executive Director
Mac Karpen;
-- the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, represented by
Golden Valley Councilmember Larry Bakken and New Brighton City
Manager Bank Sinda; and
-- the Association of Small Cities, represented by Fertile Mayor
Duane Knutson and Dassel Clerk -Treasurer Pat Bonniwell.
-1-
Organization Positions
The weekly meetings of the Advisory Committee enabled each city
organization to review the plan in detail as it developed. Thus
far, two of the organizations have taken formal positions on the
Coordinating Committee's plan.
The Board of Directors of the Association of Small Cities met on
January 9 and unanimously voted to support the Coordinating
Committee's proposal with the reservation that its Board would like
to receive and review more detailed information and computer
print-outs on how the formula will distribute aid to all small
cities both in the first year and in future years. In addition, the
Small Cities Association continues to be concerned that the
equalization aid formula's definition of "local revenue need' does
not include special assessments or user fees, financing tools
which tend to be used heavily by smaller cities.
At its December 10 meeting, the Board of Directors of the Municipal
Legislative Commission voted unanimously to oppose the Coordinating
Committee's proposal. The MLC cites several reasons for opposing
the plan, including: 1) equalization aid amounts would be based on
spending, thereby providing an incentive for cities to spend; 2)
the proposal eliminates the homestead credit which now goes to all
taxpayers regardless of geographic location; and 3) over the longer
term, the plan will reduce total state aid dollars going to the
metro area.
The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities has not yet taken a
formal position on the plan. AMM's Board will meet on February 4
and determine its position. AMM's Revenue Sources Committee
has tenatively agreed to a statement about the plan. It states that
the AMM cannot support the Coordinating Committee plan until the
following information is provided: 1) how the formula will
distribute aid in the future (a five-year print-out); 2) whether
the proposal will decrease the proportion of state aid provided to
the metro area relative to the non -metro area; 3) how the
proposal's split classification ratios will affect suburban metro
cities in the long term; 4) how cities would fare if an additional
$100 million were provided to them through the existing LGA formula;
5) how the proposal impacts other taxing units --schools, counties --
and individual taxpayers; and 6) how the new school aid formula
impacts the distribution effects of the plan.
The Range Association of Municipalities and School Districts has not
yet taken a formal position on the plan. Mac Rarpen reports that,
at this time, RAMS is likely to support the Coordinating Committee's
plan since it is preferable to the property tax system due to go
into effect for 1989. He explained, however, that RAYS will remain
open to supporting other plans that may be developed by the
Governor, Rep. Voss or Sen. Johnson.
14 G
Advisory Committee Comments
The Advisory Committee offers Comments on the Coordinating
Committee's proposal with the understanding that members have not
had an opportunity to review in detail the Governor's property tax
proposal and other proposals which may be offered by legislative
leaders. Advisory Committee members expressed reservations about
having to analyze the Coordinating Committee's proposal without any
projections of how the distribution of equalization aids might
change in the future --specifically how different cities would be
affected by increases in the state appropriation as well as cuts in
the state appropriation. With this in mind, the Advisory Committee
identified what it considers positive as well as negative elements
of any property tax reform proposal.
Elements Which the Committee Considers Positive:
1. Additional state resources -- the addition of at least
$100 million in state resources is an essential component
of any property tax reform proposal.
2. State takeover of county income maintenance costs.
3. Reduction in the number of classifications.
4. 75 percent cap (in the Coordinating Committee's plan) which
prevents any city from receiving more than 75 percent of
its total revenue need in equalization aid.
Elements Which the Committee Considers Positive But Which Are
Not in the Coodinatina Committee Plan•
I. Elimination of levy limits.
2. Mechanism which specifies how aids are to be reduced in the
event of state funding cutbacks.
Elements Which the Committee Considered Ne ative:
I. Elimination of the homestead credit program.
2. Use of a homestead exemption that is not accurate and could
confuse taxpayers about the level of property tax relief
provided by the state.
Issues on Which There Was No Consensus:
1. Allocation or equalization formula for city aid.
2. Classification ratios -- particularly the split classifi-
cations for homesteads and commercial/industrial property.
3. Concept that reform proposal causes certain cities to lose
some or all of their aid.
-.3-
AMM REVENUE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The AM.M cannot support this proposal until the following have
been reviewed, analyzed, and answered:
1. A five-year computer run to analyze the long-term
impact.
2. The metro area provides the state with 64% of the taxes
it generates, but the state returns only 46% to the metro
area. Any proposal should help to reverse this trend.
A review of this data is necessary.
3. The use of a two-tier market value system probably
helps most and out -state cities but, over the long
haul, may not help suburbs in the metro area. The use
of one market value should be analyzed.
4. The new proposal envisions an increase of $100 million;
that $100 million should be reviewed in the context of
the existing formula to compare the results with this
new proposal.
5. The impacts of this proposal on theindividualtaxpayer
in each cityshouldbe reviewed as it relates to not
only state aids to cities., but also -in relation to
other taxing jurisdictions, such as counties, schools,
homestead credit, etc. In other words, what is the
impact on the individual taxpayer in each city?
6. How the new school aid formula impacts within the
framework of this proposal.
Percent Change in Net Taxes
ht Largest Cities
Citv
Administration,
Coalition,
Pav 88, no SBC
Pav 87
Minneapolis
- 7.28
- 5.48
St. Paul
- 9.26
- 8.98
Bloomington
- 3.98
+ 0.56
Duluth
-18.86
-29.06
Rochester
- 9.26
- 7.16
Brooklyn Park
- 6.56
- 1.46
Edina
- 3.26
+ 0.96
Coon Rapids
0
+ 1.06
Burnsville
- 4.36
- 0.36
St. Cloud
- 6.16
- 6.26
Plymouth
- 4.16
- 3.16
St. Louis Park
- 4.76
+ 3.26
Minnetonka
- 4.46
+ 3.86
Eagan
- 1.76
- 0.66
Richfield
- 2.36
- 0.26
Blaine
+ 0.46
+ 1.16
Roseville
- 7,86
- 5.66
Maple Grove
- 5.26
- 3.06
Eden Prairie
- 6.76
- 1.06
Moorhead
- 3.36
-13.06
Apple Valley
- 4.36
- 5.26
Brooklyn Center
- 3.86
+ 4.56
Mankato
- 8.66
-13.36
Fridley
- 2.26
+ 1.36
Maplewood
- 7.26
- 2.26
Crystal -
- 1.26
+ 2.56
Winona
Shoreview
- 9.16
-16.36
New Brighton
- 3.26
- 4.16
- 8.56
- 6.36
White Bear Lake
- 3.86
- 1.76
New Hope
- 4.06
+ 2.46
Austin
-13.46
-16.76
Golden Valley
- 6.76
+ 4.86
Cottage Grove
- 4.26
+ 4.4%
South St. Paul
+ 6.46
+ 3.56
Inver Grove Heights
+ 0.36
+ 4.36
Columbia Heights
+ 3.96
- 3.26
Lakeville
- 6.76
- 4.26
Hibbing
-19.36
-14.56
Owatonna
- 9,56 -
-17.06
West St. Paul
+ 0.76
+ 0.66
Albert Lea
- 7,56
-12.26
Willmar
- 6.96
-15.16
Anoka
+ 0.26
- 0.56
Faribault
- 7.36
-11.76
Woodbury
- 2.36
+ 1.46 -
Hopkins
- 5.66 -
+ 1.06
Oakdale
- 2.86
- 0.26
Robbinsdale
- 3.56
- 3.26
Red Wing
- 4.66
+15.46
I �)k
MEMO
TO: JOHN ANDERSON -ADMINISTRATOR
CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JIM KARKANEN - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
SUBJECT: FLUSHER TRUCK AWARD
DATE: FEB. 2, 1988
INTRODUCTION:
The City Council authorized the Public Works Dept. to
advertise for sealed bids for a 2 1/2 ton truck to mount a
flusher/tanker which was recently purchased. The sealed bids
were opened on Wednesday, Jan. 27th, 1988, at which time they
were tabulated and evaluated by the Public Works department.
The Capital Equipment budget authorized 530,000 for the
purchase of a tank/flusher truck unit to replace our 1967 Ford
tank/flusher which was scheduled to be replaced in 1987.
BACKGROUND:
The advertised s_uecifications were designed to allow the
vendors to supply a new 1988 factory model truck, or submit,a bid
for a good used model or a dealer's demonstrator model. The
capital equipment committee had authorized our search for a good
used model or a demonstrator truck. We did not find any good
used trucks which would have fit our specific needs.
After advertising for bids, the truck specifications were
also sent to 8 area truck dealers, and we received responses from
6 of the contacted dealers.
The lowest sealed bid for a new truck was from Johnson
Motors Inc., of Glencoe who submitted a bid for an International
model 700 truck. This truck did not meet some of our basic size
specifications such as engine size, minimum GVW, and front axle
capacity minimums.
The lowest sealed bid submitted for a demonstrator truck was
received from GMC Truck Center of Mpls., for a GMC W71V truck
which far exceeded our minimum specifications.
The City Mechanic and myself have test driven both of these
vehicles and we are both convinced that the GMC demonstrator
truck is by far the best buy for the our specific needs. It is
also the only truck submitted which would fit into our Capital
Equipment budget projections.
The sealed bids for the truck chassis were not advertised
at the same time of the tanker/flusher unit because the trade-in
truck was not available from the Fire Dept. until their
replacement truck was delivered. This fire tanker could not be
used for the tank/flusher, because it was a tandem axle unit
which had a frame not suitable for a tank/flusher unit. --- -
Tank/flusher (budgeted)
tank/flusher (awarded)
for truck chassis
Johnson Motors Inc.
Mfg.& Model- Int'l Model 700
less trade-in
net price
530,000
-19,310
10,690
Std,5500
-8,600
516,900
GMC Truck Center (alternate bid)
1986 Mfg. & Model GMC Model W7HV
net price 511,331
1988 Mfg. & Model GMC Model W7HV
net price 516,692
(note: The GMC truck bid which was submitted, is for
a brand new 1986 model which has no (zero) recorded
miles. This truck is new, with a new warranty and is the
same model bid as a 1988. It is a surplus stocked truck
which is why the price is considerably lower than a 1988
model. We have inspected a similar truck and agree that
it would meet or exceed all of our specifications and
would be the proper truck chassis for our tank/flusher
unit. We have been assured that there is no difference
between the 1986 model and the current 1988 model.)
Bid _ specifications were sent to:
Boyer Ford Trucks - Mpls
Astleford International - Burnsville
Lakeland Ford Trucks - So. St. Paul
Superior Ford Inc. --Plymouth
Malkerson Motors Inc. - Shakopee
Northstar Intl Trucks.- Mpls
GMC Truck Center - Mpls -
Johnson Motors Inc. - Glencoe
13k
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Accept the apparent low bid for a new 1986 GMC
truck from GMC Truck Center for 511,331 (net bid.)
2. Accept the apparent low bid for a new 1988 International
truck from Johnson Motors for 515,900 (net bid.)
3. Reject bids and readvertise the specifications.
4. Do not purchase truck. (Tank/flusher unit is ordered.)
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative 1. Accept the apparent low bid for a new 1986
GMC Model W7HV 2 1/2 ton truck which meets all bidder
specifications, for the submitted price of 511,331 plus
trade-in of a 1980 Ford F800 tanker truck.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Award the low bid of 811,331.00 for a GMC Model W7HV truck,
as specified, to GMC PRO Truck Center of Minneapolis, Minn.,
for a tanker/flusher unit for the Public Works Dept.
I
>
� a
A O
O
a
2�
�
A
.m
F
M
,Fj
6Z
am
�=
m
S
41
iq
N
W
�
O
2
N
�^
P
N
N
?o
of
A
O
O
W
no
c
to
O
h
2
c�
H6
�
N
N
ao
?
41
Q�
.O.
F4
�
OD
a
O;
,;
OZ
(�
H
N
N
o
>0
°o
o
o
O
ao
�
l�
o
m
�
v
a
t
I
m
t^
N
a
Y
v
�
� z
a
6
�C,
z
ZC%
m
E"
v
O
�F
`.7
Z
�C
T0
T-U#
IF
Za
C:D
y
O
13P
CITY OF SHAI,OPFF.
PtBLIC hONRS DEI'ARTMFNT
PROPOSAL. FORM
BIDS CLOSF 2:00 PM, CDT, JANUARY 27th, 1988
Tu the Hminrable Mayor and
Mrml,ers of the City Council
City o/" Shakopee, Minn. 55319
Gentlemen:
We propose to furnish, in accordance with your Notice to
Bidders and Specifications, one �(2) new /Truck as Isspecified.
MAN17FACTURER AND MODEL c>/'/L P�� 11—i L/ t/ /
PRICE OF (AS SPECIFIED) s /el-
LESS TRADE -IN -(City Fire tanker) s
/
NET PRICE COMPLETE AS
DELIVERED TO SHAKOPEE
/G G, _
5 / DOLLARS AND NO � CENTS
LiLISTA
UNIT BID (DESCRIBE) 6.ti4G /V%G_�i
�_=L /7!i In % /.. ID- $ %/ •=:l DOLLARS ASD P✓„ CENTS
IS SPECIFICATIONS
LIST OPTIONS NOT SPECIFIED. n
ADD S A/ r
ADD s
//ADD s
DELIVERY DATE 9D—l✓✓ m.lf✓de�
. DAYS (.` P"c.J,
ACCOMPANYING OUR BID IS A CERTIFIED CHECE, OR BIDDERS BOND IR THE
AMOUNIOF �F = C tiHICH IS 5% OF SUBMITTED BID AMOUNT.
DATE - P; . i= i 1988 - FIRVyM
Subscribed an_�y:orn RAMOKAv _ ,, %l ME—
before
✓ before me thi
ham' day o / IF
rA'n T
stir! �. � �' .�. •1�/) BY
Koctai-y Pub c, v Com iss on '
expires TITLE Cu✓'l/ir �li;'/„/( ' ^'!'
l 0A1 /�'^7 Ii%✓�GPU //✓CCL.(GF_'� /(o S�/!/✓B.
/S/ IVZ: 1,(/.!/ 7- C%nicCT �8✓
l
CITY OF SHAKOFEF
PUBLIC FORKS DEPARTMENT
PROPOSAL FORT;
BIDS CLOSE 2:00 PM, CDT, JANUARY 27th, 1988
To the Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
City of Shakopee, Minn. 55379
Gentlemen:
We propose to furnish, in accordance with your Notice to
Bidders. and Specifications, one (l) new Truck. as specified.
MANUFACTURER AND MODEL i..tezoatin�=� u=+��=_+_� m„nel aOD
PRICE OF (AS SPECIFIED) S V4 500 nn
LESS TRADE-IN (City Fire tanker) S to Fn0 on
NET PRICE COMPLETE AS
DELIVERED TO SHAKOPEE S $15.900 00
-----------------------------------------'_------------------
S
DOLLARS
AND
CENTS
ALTERNATE
UNIT
BID-
(DESCRIBE)
ALT. NET BID - S DOLLARS AND CENTS
----------------------------------------------------------------
LIST ANY EXEMPTIONS TO SPECIFICATIONS
LIST OPTIONS NOT SPECIFIED ADD S
2 speed _ _e]„ A -ea .iag .: .... x-%1.8 on--i'�,—�ix� ADD S
-=290280a ADD S
.'�".. .G7A; ii1929 is on..-
ikh ADD S
DELIVERY DATE
DAYS
ACCOMPANYING OUR BID IS A CERTIFIED CHECK, OR BIDDERS BOND IN THE
AMOUNT OF S.$!795 o0 FHICH IS 5% OF SUBMITTED BID AMOUNT.
DATE 1_27 1988 FIRM Johnson Motors Inc.
Subscribed and sworn ADDRESS 410 east 10th street
before me this
aZ day of _r/9A1 1988
�. -0�'9R BI /
1 STM+'• G1�y Cc mission
ni MCLE0DL0Ytry7y TITLE
VI G°�nYr°" ��a�.w.0 n. »R
#** Gene Brown Agency, Inc.
119 SOUTH LEWIS STREET SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 TELEPHONE:"5-5560
Pla 1 Via Pledtlem
EUGENE A. BROW N ROBERT J. BROWN
June 10, 1987
Mr. Al Fischer
Malkerson Motors, Inc.
1206 E. let Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear Mr. Fischer:
Pursuant to your request, I have inspected and appraised the
property legally described as Lot A and the West 20 feet of Lot B,
Block 30, Fast Shakopee Addition, Shakopee, Minnesota.
The purpose of this appraisal is to ascertain the current "fair
market value 11 of the property, which is -the highest price estimated
in terms of money which the property will bring if exposed for sale
in the open market by a seller who is willing but not obligated•to
Bell, allowing a reasonable time to find a buyer who is willing but
not obligated to buy; both parties having full knowledge of all uses
to which it is adapted and for which it is capable of being used.
The property dimensions are 80x147.5 feet. The square footage is
11,800. There is no access to the property accept a 16 foot utility
easement which rens North and South from First Avenue to the North-
west corner of subject property and an approximate 12 foot portion of
an alleyway which also adjoins the property at the Northwest corner.
In my opinion, it would be highly unlikely for anyone in the
open market to purchase this parcel. However, the present owner of the
puoperty teethe North, Fast, and West (yourself would benefit from
a purchase.
My estimate of the fair market value of the property as of
June 9, 1987 is as follows:
$ 23.000.00
Rectfully ubmitted,
Robert J. Brown, Broker
Gene Brown Agency, Inc.
,..
_.
-----.P.,-Vi
...,1•-•...r
_______ ......-
---_____.:41..._.:..-=--
----- •-•-•••...
........mml — —____
-""••••••.............••••••"
_
.. - --__
-- ---_ 2 - r—,-...-•-:--:•-:,'--t•-)b---.s. • = ..,.---. c ---1 - -
_.--.--.:-.>"'__.,1-40•••• • . - 2"..4s4.7: :.',-- '-'•;•.-
$‘'-....1•'“ .i.:•••••.-
',1„,/•--S,9041.4•5r....:r;'• •,' •' --...:'- ' _ •
c•-- •••• -.- - -
•
.C.•...,
, ,-- - ---. -
......... - --•,.r '--J. -t-e- ,. ---',...-. - - ... -
- .-t2,-,-::!---t:Z:/:-. - • ----' ,
,
- --
_-
r-3.--,s,-. -.....l E.........• ,......,-,.:
_ ."'.•' - /./.."'•••\ -''.-"-..• r
'.s---' .' . , - . ''.-.'• -
.... ,:t, .. •••••0••'•, 7 . .•
,..._ .) ' ..,-..--...r:_ „-.::•••• ':,..,s, s
•- s" *2.;.--;•:' -'• .3 A_ ---'s''''' ... ,•"..- _,.....,_.„,r_. 4,,..-- ,.... .
-.._,-e_.....- ,, ....1.----)er* -
e.-^,4.-•, ,-, ....-t-• `.......vo-er . .
_..: ,.t • _-,--- , . •--- f - '-; '''-1,1467,-;(,....•-- ' - - , .
,.....• , t<----- • ,... 4,,..1 --.-.--,,,,i,,.!-A _ -, ,L,.....--7 • - -
.,....,_-• --•••••• e•-•:. --,Z.,:4-..- ,. - --ov_Lis
-/-- -.---,*-- .'‘,1,'".4 .--;-.840 :'''.'''-' ..4.••• ''.44' .1W s . -' ',',.; .-.•.,:-
L..&...••""'..-.'-...."'"ita. ' ••• "'.' .. ...• . •'` la" '
i..4.41.=It-- ,4
-.'•-• ....4 ..,....,.....-X°' - •^-j....,,,:,...4•••.?4.-- br, '-..... 11,1° x• -,_ 'sr`
-.4.:•• .....;••:4-. 2 1;4 _ , 4- r......14..-4.••4 ,.. 111 ,-; '. ' ':-(1'4
gi- ..,._.:..-, - ArSii0:41111116 .4411k1Wit,•' r.....47. - r' "----7.-N L.- ---,..,-.
.... ..-'
...4 6.*1•"1 11111-11121)41 1 6. - f:-.',..'"•-''')'11 t ' glA
...
EOM!In ' is i• 'tv4 - • -.,,,,,......,---, i(i,
r_._.-k` _ s • ft. , ,
' la ,• .
--• . -..4, r. , •Ii•ii- • .....'"..'" • .
•••
All Lik irimilii...".
Ic • • ." ••••I
10 it .4
•t A 0.,
1147 r/.. 04
..11
. -
.
. , . .
,..k.,.........., .
.
\....
. . '•' •= ity.-2_--1 ._•-•.--_.____, 4 ......4t,_•4.,.
.. tj'A j'''''' 'rk.., ,. ..0,•.:.0
_ •14114 . \
III ....••••••••I'd' it
- ''' ..5•. 111110, .
•',7.i. \...„.............. , 4 t
- 3 r"--..„»- .". ..-7-;....r..^ ;';
-1 1,4-...:1;:i.z v--,,.;,-...!-:;,.. s•--r ,.7.
-,,,--p..,--•4.... ...-- - ;-,._
r t f--71- _,.,-;*- ----
, • p,„,.., ,
. .,,,.:,.....„. „ .. .,i
Fri ligi
• - . .....
• ;Ruin!.
0 --,__ :-- • - - t
-z
1,,,,,, --.._t-,e,,. • --3.5i .
II,
Vitir:17 ratia -
WO. _ . - ....
,....
.. . ,... ......, _., , ......„ -.... -.............
,...
......
ct a"'r' # 7: J.7,---.4J-1". , •
- ,
„,-A.,..,-.-;:-,f. .x*-- ;.'..`--f7 • ....4i•
...... -4.-,:.- ..•-: --z.--..-4,xx
.... 4.3 = . -..,..--.,_."..1'.i-,•*;liir-.;.,:4;
,..., 1441tif....
rj:- --,2,..
y .......
- ;.
it 4111111 111111 ;F•e. -g-r..-:, -.,,,_,_
1 ' 1
cs:
1 1141 I ii 1 I , ISO% :.4'''.4,-i,-, to._
rnrril UTILITY -
iiitli:i BLDG ,- D.-__--.1:”,
ipp•-„,::. •-_....-.!..: :„...:... ...,i......,N, -
'-- ' ''..' -- -2'="--1- e-'-: --•t7?"-q.;"• i-
-
..; . - .-
* , ..... ,.4•
1-4.
L-2:-,..,-. F-w-:.-,,,,
5 \ -''''''''..1111111111111111 ..•:7: • - ........;-..:',........., --
..e:..,.....„...... ; ,, • .1 1' ........4
11.-* - :.•':• .7 ..., *' 1%,--:V3 _ ., ,:_ 4t_. :.
V
--1
• _ _ ••••,
• ' -.- .'1 .7 ..-• - - . ..... _ -... —
t't iszr
lilt
• :::i'. --,.". ----; .t.:,i_L__1'
III
Et
12 ' ::::...,:.•...v.•::e.st:., ,. ‘Z„..11 1 •
.Zi i ..,-
,-.44..- -.
- ...-.. •
•- ... .- ......-:-,- '-.„f. •,.....---:.,-.1--•--,- --------- -- --
_
.--. .1 .,,,.... ,
alr
‘..,
..
.4- : , t -.-4----..-----..-- -. ...- . -
; ' -,, ,-. . ..-,,_t=7. MUNICI A
-. . i: • • ----• .:,- -. - : -z•-.4- .7 .
I -.' --:-. ‘...-:NP, i•-•-• .4.--- SERVICE -PL::: - - - .•,
• " -,- ' - ' --7-
,-,' • ,.-,..-.• - BUILDING
..?.._ - . . =:•-•-: -.---.::...--.... '''
- ' --...'' -,••- .., - , Ro 5 0. ke„.. ' :-.•,. - -4,-. i . ,r..,!,'--• --.. -- - ---;-,--zr--,v---7 , -
.:::-.1-3%-„,..1.-TT- - •
_
G.1 R MAN ' --.N- .---r, •'I ' - - •
Y* .
, ,....„
. . ' I .."7,,"•7"..-4,1
IELD - . _
--.....,,
:„.
,
--•••-•nb, WiWrratai
....
../..
.-- ....••••••••••••••••••••••.-•