HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/02/1987 i
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Adminsitrator
RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items
DATE: May 28, 1987
1. Several months ago the City received notice that police
officers would be responsible for the unpaid bills of
individuals taken by the officers to St. Francis Regional
Hospital. The Council directed staff to meet with the
hospital which we did. The hospital has agreed not to make
the police officer (or his particular city) liable for the
bill. Currently the County Attorney and County Human
Services are working on a policy to decide who will pay for
uncollectable medical bills under these circumstances.
2. St. Marks Parish has applied to the State Gambling Board for
a lawful gambling exemption for July 25th and 26th. St.
Marks meets the requirements of the City Code relating to
lawful gambling.
3 . Rod Krass, Gloria Vierling, Dolores Lebens and I will be
meeting is Scott County Historical Society representatives
on Monday night, June 1st. If Council action is required
quickly it will be brought up at the Council meeting on June
2nd, if not Council will see it on June 16th. Attached is a
copy of a legal opinion from the Assistant County Attorney
regarding financing methods Scott County could use if they
no longer funded the operation through the Scott County
Historical Society.
4. Attached is a copy of a registered letter that LeRoy Houser
has sent to Richard Wiggin regarding his apartment building
on 12th Avenue. The letter was the result of a meeting
between LeRoy and the City Attorney. They both agreed that
direct action was appropriate and therefore Council will not
see a memo listing alternative courses of action.
5. Attached is a report from the Comparable Worth Review Panel
regarding the first employee appeal to move through all four
steps of the comparable worth appeal process. Council will
see these summary reports as the committee makes its
findings known. Marilyn, our Personnel Coordinator, will
keep the complete file on record for each employee
participating in the appeal process.
6. Attached is a memorandum from Jim Karkanen providing
Councilmembers with background information on a recent sewer
backup. (This item will be on the table Tuesday night)
7. Attached is a copy the notice establishing the date, time
and place of the first mediation session between Public
Works Local 320 and the City of Shakopee. I will provide
Council a brief update at the end of the Council meeting.
8. Attached is a article from Jeff Siegel regarding recent
problems incurred by the developers of the River Bluff -Music
Center in Savage.
9. Attached is a copy of the Senate and House Journal pages
reflecting the final vote on the admissions ax legislation.
Councilmempers rarely see these so I though this particular
issue might be of interest. Just r d the material
immediately following the circled phrases.
10. Attached is a memorandum from Harry tock regarding the
Scott County Regional Railroad Authorit .
11. Attached is a memorandum from B rry Stock regarding
relocation of recycling drop-off site
12. Attached is a memorandum from Ken Ashfeld regarding lots
purchased for the Bypass in the K' arney Hills Addition.
13. Attached is a project statreport from the Engineering
Department. \
14. Attached is the invitation,/sent but by the Chamber for the
Shakopee Media Day on June 12th.
15. Attached is the monthly calendar for June.
16. Attached are the agendas for the June 4, 1987 meetings of
the Planning Commission and Board of AdAustment and Appeals.
17. Attached are the minutes of the May 7, 187 meeting of the
Shakopee Coalition.
18. Attached is a letter from Senator Schmitz responding to our
letter regarding local government aid cuts \in transit and
transportation funding.
19. Application has been made by Toby Tyler Circus for an old
fashioned circus and standard circus mid -way 6P June 18th
and 19th at Raceway Park. When the insurances ae in order
the license will be issued.
20. Jeff Siegel from Scottland has informed me that the will be
having an informational meeting on Starwood for akopee
residents on Wednesday, June 3rd at the KC Hall be cau a they
had a very small turnout for their meeting on May 28th
21. Attached is a memorandum from Marilyn Remer regarding
Comparable Worth Survey results.
22. Carol Schultz has advised us that she has accepted a part
time day job and will no longer be taking minutes for us
effective mid June. We are advertising for a successor.
7. Attached is a copy the notice establishing the date, time
and place of the first mediation session between Public
works Local 320 and the City of Shakopee. I will provide
Council a brief update at the end of the Council meeting.
8. Attached is a article from Jeff Siegel regarding recent
problems incurred by the developers of the River Bluff Music
Center in Savage.
9. Attached is a copy of the Senate and House Journal pages
reflecting the final vote on the admissions tax legislation.
Councilmembers rarely see these so I thought this particular
issue might be of interest. Just read the material
immediately following the circled phrases.
10. Attached is a memorandum from Barry Stock regarding the
Scott County Regional Railroad Authority.
11. Attached is a memorandum from Barry Stock regarding
relocation of recycling drop-off site. _
12. Attached is a memorandum from Ken Ashfeld regarding lots
purchased for the Bypass in the Killarney Hills Addition.
13. Attached is a project status report from the Engineering
Department.
14. Attached is the invitation sent out by the Chamber for the
Shakopee Media Day on June 12th.
15. Attached is the monthly calendar for June.
16. Attached are the agendas for the June 4, 1987 meetings of
the Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment and Appeals.
17. Attached are the minutes of the May 7, 1987 meeting of the
Shakopee Coalition.
18. Attached is a letter from Senator Schmitz responding to our
letter regarding local government aid cuts in transit and
transportation funding.
19. Application has been made by Toby Tyler Circus for an old
fashioned circus and standard circus mid -way on June 18th
and 19th at Raceway Park. When the insurances are in order
the license will be issued.
20. Jeff Siegel from Scottland has informed me that they will be
having an informational meeting on Starwood for Shakopee
residents on Wednesday, June 3rd at the KC Hall because they
had a very small turnout for their meeting on May 28th.
21. Attached is a memorandum from Marilyn Remer regarding
Comparable Worth Survey results.
22. Carol Schultz has advised us that she has accepted a part
time day job and will no longer be taking minutes for us
effective mid June. We are advertising for a successor.
-,T ,-'_-
JAMES A. TERWEDO
SCOTT COUNTY ATTORNEY
�.. COURT HOUSE 206
SHAKOPEE, MN. 55379.1380 (612}937-6240
M 010RAHDOM
TO: Joseph P. Ries, County Administrator
FROM: Clifford G. McCann, Assistant County Attorney
SUBJECT: Scott Comty Ponding Of Murphy's Landing
DATE: May 28, 1987
In response to your recent question regarding other financing methods whereby
Scott County could continue to provide funding to Murphy's Landing should
Scott County no longer fund the operation through the Scott County Historical
Society, we are of the opinion that should any other governmental unit operate
the facility or contract for same that Scott County may make a gift to that
local governmental unit with the stated purpose of funding Murphy's Landing
without abridging the authority of Minn. Stat. 4138.052 (1986).
State law specifically provides that local units of government may make
gifts to each other. with the addition of conditions to the gift the donee
local governmental unit has the choice of accepting the gift with the conditions
or rejecting it, but upon acceptance of the gift with conditions the gift
must be used in accordance with the conditions.
If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please feel free
to contact this office.
CGM/jkf
cc: James A. Terwedo, County Attorney
An Equal Opponuniry Employer
Mr. Richard Wiggin
2151 W. 133rd St.
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Mr. Wiggin:
Please be advised the building located on Lot 1, Block 1,
Minnesota Valley 5th Addition, is deemed a substandard,
dilapidated building dueto abandonment and decay pursuant to the
Minnesota Dilapidated Building Statute.
The matter has beenreferredto the City Attorney for abatement
of this condition.
Pursuant to the aforementioned statutes, you have two options for
abatement, they are as follows:
1. Secure new permits and commence within 30
days to complete this structure.
2. Raze the structure and haul the material to a
secured landfill.
If neither of the options are exercised within thirty days,
condemnation will be started on this structure.
Your cooperation is requested.
Sincerely,
LeRl Houser
Building Official
LH:cah
cc: City Attorney
The Heart of Progress Valley
y
CITY OF
SHAKOPEE
°
INCORPORATED 1870
129 EAST FIRST AVENUE, SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA 5537&1376 (612( X45-3650
(q
rc
May 26, 1987
tit
Mr. Richard Wiggin
2151 W. 133rd St.
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Mr. Wiggin:
Please be advised the building located on Lot 1, Block 1,
Minnesota Valley 5th Addition, is deemed a substandard,
dilapidated building dueto abandonment and decay pursuant to the
Minnesota Dilapidated Building Statute.
The matter has beenreferredto the City Attorney for abatement
of this condition.
Pursuant to the aforementioned statutes, you have two options for
abatement, they are as follows:
1. Secure new permits and commence within 30
days to complete this structure.
2. Raze the structure and haul the material to a
secured landfill.
If neither of the options are exercised within thirty days,
condemnation will be started on this structure.
Your cooperation is requested.
Sincerely,
LeRl Houser
Building Official
LH:cah
cc: City Attorney
The Heart of Progress Valley
5
Memo To: Joe Honermann
From: Comparable Worth Review Panel
Re: Comparable Worth Appeal
Date: May 20, 1987
The Comparable Worth Review Panel consisting of Gregg Voxland, Finance
Director; Dennis Kraft, Community Development Director; and Mark McQuillan,
Community Recreation Program Supervisor met May 20, 1987 and have denied
your Comparable Worth Appeal for the following reasons:
1. Claim of being involved with 908 of sewer work not supported, 10-
158 according to timesheets and supervisors.
2. Timesheets and supervisors show him to be comparable to other LEO's
and composite (Benchmark).
3. Difference between LEO & HEO accounted for on TSP, see above # 2.
4. Shakopee hierarchy comparable to benchmarks and other cities.
Conclusion:
Review Committee has evaluated the documentation submitted and
determined that there is insufficient evidence to support
reclassification or changing the TSP point values (retaking TSP).
MEMO: JOHN ANDERSON
FROM: JIM KARKANEN
SUBJECT: SEWER BACKUP -E. SHAKOPEE AVE. & RAMSEY ST.
DATE: MAY 26, 1987
INTRODUCTION:
A sewer backup occurred the morning of Saturday, May 22nd,
1987, at 1601 East Shakopee Ave.(Gene/Gwen Berg) and 1611 E.
Shakopee Ave. (Loren Wolfe). The basement at 1601 (Berg),
reported about 2" of sewage backup in the basement, at 1611
(Wolfe), according to the responding crew members, the carpeting
in one room was wet.
BACKGROUND:
The responding crew, Joe Honermann and Glenn Heyda, reported
to the site at 12:30 PM, after being notified by the Sheriff's
dispatch. The responding crew jetted the main sewer line on
Shakopee Ave from the manhole at 1437 E. Shakopee Ave., to the
manhole at Ramsey Street, and relieved the apparent blockage with
this jetting action. They could only speculate that it could
have been possibly caused by a possible grease buildup, only
because they did not observe any foreign material or objects in
the downstream manhole while opening the blockage...
This sewer line has been on a twice a year preventive
maintenance program because there had been another backup on this
line on April 17th, 1985, affecting the same two basements, which
are apparently the lowest in the immediate area. This line had
been cleaned on Dec. 18th, 1986, according to our records and the
foreman's diary, and would have been scheduled to be checked and
cleaned sometime in June, 1987.... I have told the property owner
of 1601, Mrs. Berg, that we would schedule this line for three
times a year Prev. Maint. until we can determine what is causing
the backup problem in this area.... Mrs. Berg suggested that they
may install a backwater valve in their service line in order to
help prevent this problem in their basement....
The property owner reported that it took a long time to
reach any of the crew members by using the Sheriff's dispatch....
Because it was the Memorial Day holiday weekend, several of our
crew members were out of town, but there were crew members
available who reported that they were not notified of the
callback. The Sheriff's Dept., and our Police Dept., have a call
list that is current.
I have talked to Mrs. Berg, who was given a copy of the
Administrative Policy #50, which details the claim procedure.
She indicated that she has already contacted her insurance agency
of the backup, and I will notify the Capesius Agency.
P.2
Addendum to Sewer memo dated May 26, 1987
t4-6
June 2, 1987
Additional information now available to us indicates that
the area that experienced the sewer backup on Saturday, May 23rd,
had received preventive maintenance on Dec. 18th, 1986. This
preventive maintenance consisted of the mechanical rodding of the
main, from Miller St. to Ramsey Street, but for some unknown
reason, the crew members did not extend their preventive
maintenance program downstream to Marschall Road. It was in this
area that the backup on May 23rd had occurred, and it has been
determined that this particular location did not receive any
attention within the past year. The street foreman has accepted
responsibility for this oversight.
Follow up rodding and jetting has been performed in the
section of pipe to insure us that the pipe will remain open
without further problems. Subsequent televising has shown the
inner walls of the pipe to have a very heavy accumulation of
grease buildup. This heavy buildup will require more mechanical
rodding and jetting, and will probably have been accomplished by
the time Council receives this memo.
Loren D. Wolfe (1611 E. Shakopee Ave.) has questioned the
response time after the backup was initially noticed by the
residents affected, and indicated that they had dialed the
emergency 911 phone number for aid. The Sheriff's dispatcher had
received the call at 11:38 AM, a call was placed on my phone
answering machine at 11:47 -AM, and Joe Honermann was notified by
the neighborhood at 12:05 PM (approximate time) and he reported
into our building at 12:14 PM on our time clock. The other
worker who reported with him punched in at 12:16, and they
indicated that they were at the worksite about 12:30 PM.
A problem arose,- in that the dispatcher, for some reason or
another, did not have our call list available to her when she
received the call. She tried my phone number, then called the
S.P.U.C. "on duty" person who gave her a list of our personnel.
During the Memorial Day weekend, we had 2 crew members who
had indicated that they would be out of town, while the other
crew members were available to respond to any emergencies. When
the dispatcher started calling down the list given her by
S.P.U.C., she was not getting any response. Upon investigating,
it was revealed that three of the crew members were home, but
working in their garages and backyards, and simply did not hear
the phone ringing. Mrs. Wolfe was able to contact Joe Honermann
(at 12:05 PM) and reported to work at 12:14. He had contacted
another crew member before leaving his residence, and this other
crew member punched in at 12:16. Dispatch, in the meantime, was
handling other radio and phone traffic and started calling the
list again,
that he was
reached the
The blockage
11:38
11:47
12:05
12:14 &
12:28
12:30
and reached Joe's house at 12:28, and was informed
already responding to the call. Both crew members
worksite with the equipment at approx. 12:30 PM.
was opened up shortly afterwards.
Dispatch received the call on 911
My phone answering machine was contacted
Joe Honermann was contacted
12:16 Both crew members reported at the time clock
Dispatch contacted Joe's residence and was told that
he had already responded.
Crew reported to the work site.
It would, in my opinion, be considered reasonable to be able to
report to the emergency within 30 minutes after receiving a call.
The crew members, often times, must change clothing, arrange for
a baby sitter(if necessary), transport themselves to our
building, and pick up the equipment needed for the callback. The
two crewmembers, on this call, reported to the worksite within 25
minutes, which would be considered within a reasonable time
frame. Honermann lives on Jackson St., which is a 10 minute
drive to our building. Remember, that we have several crew
members who do not live in Shakopee, and they would have a longer
reporting time to report to work. Incidentally, another one of
our crew members became aware of the callback, and reported that
he would remain on a standby basis, if needed. This person was
also at his residence at the time of the call.
In order to contact our department in an emergency, we have
an emergency number in the phone book listed as 445-6666. This
number isthePublic number at our Police office, and will be
answered by our patrolmen on duty, and if there is no answer at
this number, it automatically goes to the Sheriff's dispatch on
an override. 911 calls are not routed to our local Police
station. It is my understanding that the parties involved in the
sewer backup used the emergency 911 phone number. When the
dispatcher contacted the S.P.U.C. crew member, this apparently
caused some of the delay in finding someone to respond to the
problem.
In contacting Tom Felcynn, the claims adjuster for our
insurance carrier, we informed him of the apparent oversight in
the preventive maintenance on this portion of the sewer main, and
he indicated that they would probably have to pay the claim
because of the apparent negligence involved in this case. He
indicated that he would contact the property owner again.
In televising the sewer main between Ramsey St. and
Marschall Road, (the downstream portion of this line,) we have
noticed a very heavy buildup of grease on the inner walls of the
pipe, and this apparently was the cause of the backup. We will
schedule this area for 3 times a year inspection until we can
determine the frequency of maintenance required, than adjust our
schedule accordingly.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
PUBLIC N'ORKS DEPARTMENT
EMERGENCY CALL LIST
STREET
JIM KARKANEN (SUPT.)
HARE)' PASS (FOREMAN)
JERK) DIRCKS
BILL DOEGE
JOE HONERAIANN
TODD 13RINKHAUS
DICK CHEEVER
GENE JEURISSEN
DOROTHY McPHERSON
PARK
HOH'IE HELLER (LEADMAN)
WALLY LUREEN
MIKE HULLANDER
GLENN HEYDA
CITY HALL
JOHN ANDERSON (ADMINISTRATOR)
KEN ASHFELD (ENGINNER)
RAY RUUSKA (TECHNICIAN)
JOHN DeLACEY "
STEVE HURLEY "
S.P.U. C.
14 &
445-3549
496-1774
445-1670
445-4197
445-6920
492-6307
445-2870
756-3424
496-1712
445-3750
445-4856
448-7646
445-5756
445-1602
477-6943
937-8581
445-7862
445-8578
LOU VANHOUT (MANAGER) 445-7244
RAY FRIEDGES (SUPT.) 445-2751
MARV ATHMAN 445-7164
FOR AN EMERGENCY. CALL THE "ON DUTY' MAN (ON RECORDING) 445-1968
STATE OF MINNESOTA
BUREAU OF MEDIATION SERVICES
205 AURORA AVENUE RECEIVED
SAINT PAUL 55103
PHONE 6123962525 MAY ' 21987
May 21, 1987
IN THE MATTER OF: CITY OF SHAKOPEE.
Teamsters 320
and
City of Shakopee
CASE NO. 87 -PN -729
RECEIPT OF MEDIATION PETITION
AND MEETING NOTICE
A request for mediation services in the above -captioned
matter has been received by this agency. Pursuant to the Public
Employment Labor Relations Act of 1971, as amended, you are hereby
notified of the following mediation meeting being held for
purposes of resolving this matter:
DATE: Monday, June 15, 1987
TIME: 1:30 p.m.
PLACE: Normandy Inn, 405 S. 8th St., Mpls. Mn.
Both parties to this matter have a legal obligation to be
present at this meeting and to make good faith efforts to resolve
the dispute. Accordingly, each party must vest its
representatives to mediation meetings with the authority to
negotiate in good faith, the ability to identify unresolved
issues, and to set forth the positions, of that party with respect
to each issue in dispute.
Pursuant to the provisions of M.S. 179A.18, the Mediation.
Period in this matter commenced on 4/1/87 and ends on 5/15/87
EB:jt
xc:
Robert Weisenburger
John Anderson
Cy Smythe
City Clerk
Chairman, City Council
_4w �*
Sincerely yours,
�xel�
Mediator Scheduler
OrTHE
V-, SCOTTLAND RECEIVED
COMPANIES MAY 271987
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Eldon Reinke
Councilmember Delores Lebens
Councilmember John Leroux
Councilmember Gloria Vierling
Councilmember Jerry Wampach
Councilmember Steve Clay
John Anderson, City Administrator
Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer
Dennis Kraft, Director of Community Development
Doug Wise, City Planner
FROM: Jeffrey Siegel/Bruce Malkerson
DATE: May 26, 1987
Thought you might be interested in the attached article
(Prior Lake American, May 25, 1987).
JS:ap
Attachment
P.O. Box 509 1244 Canterbury Road Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612] 445-3242
River Bluffs developer
Prior Lake American -
May 25, 1987 Aill -Mopes-for approval -
Jeamne'Rass
Staff Reporter
The possibility of an ou[dcor River
Bluffs Music Center in Savage is dead
as far. as the city and residents are
concerned, but project developer John
Karrstillhasbope.
"At this point, we haven't submitted
anything to the city mmeil. Before
doing that, we'd have to change the
political chute quite a bit. We haven't
decided what to do yet. Obviously,
things are not as positive there as when
it was first introduced and we're taking
a good, hard look as to why," Karr said:
last Friday.
At the last Savage City Council
meeting held Thursday, May 14,
Savage Mayor Rod Hopp amomced
that the River Bluffs outdoor am-
phitheater projectwas dead as far as he
was concerned. Karr said that no
representatives from Northstar
FinancialCor %:?That meeting
proposers.
because he believedthe issue was taken
off the agenda for that meeting.
Karr, thought the city gavethe mroject
an extension Thursday beforethe
meeting to work with the city's
financial consultant to develop the tax
increment financing for the per. The
financial work was not completed for
the meeting, and Karr asked the city to
take the issue of the agenda, he said.
"And that turned out to be a source of
some confusion. The citizens thought it
was a statement on our part regarding
our intention, in Savage. But it
wasn't," Kan explained.
Tax increment financing in the
River Bluffs from page
The outdoor amphitheater, which
was proposed by the Northstar
Financial Corporation, would Occupyy
140 -acre site in Savage,
Biway 33 on the east, Comity Road 16 on
the north, Boune Ave. on the west and
undeveloped land on the south.
The planned facility would seat 6,000
under a roof and an additional 14,000 on
a grass law. There would be parking
for 7,200 cars.
The EAW identifies environmental
issues that need to be looked at for
proposed development. The Council's
review focused on how the EAW ad-
dresses areas of regional concern, such
as location and regional transportation
and sewer systems.
district would Mance highway fm-
provemenfs and the sewer and water
Me extensions. Kari points out that the,
tax increment financting would bene
frt,.�
not only the River BluRsProject, but ,
also all property owners where the,.
highway improvements. and sewer and.;:
waterMes would go in.
Some Savage residents organized in..
opposition to the project because of
anticipated traffic problems and the
added burden the project would place
on the city's sewer and water systems:.. The group of citizensnamed them-
selves Save Our Residential.:Enl
vironment (SORE) and hired'an aEr
tomey for their case. They mounted a`l,
strong campaign, completewithl
newsletters and petitions, against the'
amphitheater proposal. About 400
residents signed the petition and Hopp
said he received numerous phone calls
and letters in opposition to the project
before the meeting.
But atter studying the River Bluff
Music Center and how it would affect
the surrounding area, the Metropolitan
Council said it would not overtax the
mainline highway system oroverload
the Savage wastewater treatment
plant. .. ......
The Cowell, responding to comments
in an Environmental -.Assessment
Worksheet (EAW),said planned
highway improvements will held
alleviate anticipated traffic problems
in the area. In addition, sufficient sewer
capacity is available in the near future
to handle the music center mill
planned improvements are completed.
RIVER BLUFFS to page 3 .,. _
Traffic to and from the River Bluff
Music Center is not expected to create a
need for an addtional mainline highway
capacity, the Council said. Regional
forecasts suggest that the traffic in-
creases will occur as a result of the
continued urbanization in the Savage -
Prior Lake -Shakopee area, regardless
of whether a music center is built.
Before he and other developers in the
project make any more decisions, Can
said they will take a look at the tax
increment financing issue with the
project and the new state tax on an-
teriammentfaciBties.
"With 25 cents extra on a ticket, that
could affect it too. We have to take
several issues into consideration during
the next few days; ' Karr said. He hopes
to reach a decision sometime next week
on whether to pursue the project is
Savage.
Northstar hes invested "several.
hundred thousand dollars" in the..
project at this point, Karr said. He
emphasized that the project would go
ahead, but perhaps not in Savage.
"We're going to build the project.
Since the stories have come out with
some of the difficulties we've been
having in Savage, other communities
expressed an interest in the Project and
we're taking a look at those alternative
siw,"he said. _
e
John K. Anderson
City Administrator
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear John:
MAY 2 21991
CRY OF SHAKOPEEI
Please find enclosed the Senate and House Journal pages which
will give you the amendments and final vote on the admissions tax
legislation. Although the Republicans were difficult to convince
to vote for this tax, note that Senators Belanger, Knutson and Storm
did provide "yes" votes, as did a number of IR House members.
It was a pleasure to work for the City of Shakopee on this issue.
I will be sending you a final invoice later. you can expect it to be
Sincerely,
Olt --
Robert G. Renner, Jr.
Legislative Counsel
RGR:dhl
Enclosures
MESSERLI & KRAMER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
NEESERIJ
ROES E.n
1500 NORTHLAND PLAZA ..'LOING
RACUM
MARK S. I.ARSON
3600 WEST BOTH STREET
TIMOTHY J. BwUER
MINNESOTA 55431-"09
SE. X. rREDERICK
MINNEAPOLIS,
ROCCRT G. RENNER. JR.
SANDRA L. NEREN
16121 693-6650
RAMDOLPX W. MORRIS
M. BEGAN
AKNAS
VL M. CEGIW
CXRISTOPXER e. X"nr
May 21, 1987
IAURIE P. XV VSKO
AMES C. WIEKA
wl,C A.
SHOTULA
ERIC RT
MICHA.SICNAEL D. PEOERSON
John K. Anderson
City Administrator
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear John:
MAY 2 21991
CRY OF SHAKOPEEI
Please find enclosed the Senate and House Journal pages which
will give you the amendments and final vote on the admissions tax
legislation. Although the Republicans were difficult to convince
to vote for this tax, note that Senators Belanger, Knutson and Storm
did provide "yes" votes, as did a number of IR House members.
It was a pleasure to work for the City of Shakopee on this issue.
I will be sending you a final invoice later. you can expect it to be
Sincerely,
Olt --
Robert G. Renner, Jr.
Legislative Counsel
RGR:dhl
Enclosures
53rd Day]
FaaaAY, MAY 15, 1987
5417
Segal
C Seaberg
Sparby 15' re Yanasek
Stenius ..kine Vellenga
Wewal
Winter
Shaver
Steens.. Tumble Voss
wywa
Simoneau
Svfggum Tubeim Wagenius
SPk. Norton
Skoglund
Swenson ilohus Walt
Z.
Miller Schafer Sviggam
Sal6erg
Thiede Mato Welle
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
CB1aL
was
cvn,aad h en the hours of 8:15 p.m.
and 9:30 p.m.
A H. F. No.
1219 was reported to the House.
Kelso moved to amend H. F. No. 1219, the first engrossment, as
` follows:
Page 1, line 12, delete "the cost" and insert "all related costs"
Page 2, line 14, delete "the earlier of (1)"
Page 2, line 18, delete "a or (2) construction of the"
Page 2, line 19, delete'Bloomington ferry bridge is completed"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Bishop was excused while in conference.
Onnen moved to amend H. F. No. 1219, the first engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 10, before "admissions" insert "adult"
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Onnen amendment and the roll
C was called.
There were 29 yeas and 90 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Bennett
Heap Omen Schreiber Swenson
Clausnitur
Knickerbocker Onnen Seaberg Thiede
F,eriche
Marsh Poppenhagen Shaver TT1}orrdwm
Gutknerht
McKeay Quiet Skoglund Valeato
Hartle
Mcpherson Richter S,.,. Waltman
Haukoes
Miller Schafer Sviggam
5418
Carlson, L.
JOuaxA or me Housx
[53rd Day
Those who voted in the negative were
Battaglia
And., G.
Greenfield
Kostohrys
0 v
Srhcevfeld
BattsggHa
Bauerly
Gruenes
Himle
Krueger
Leman
Olsen, S.
Olson, E.
Segel
Simoneau
Beard
Hugosw
Easley
Ly
Olson, K.
Solberg
Begich
Jacobs
Kludt
Osthoff
Sparby
Bertram
Jam.
Loqq
Otie
3tzen.ma
Boo
Jefferson
McEavhem
Pa
Pauly
Timble /
1lmhemn
Brown
Jentoop
McLaughlin
Munger
C
B er
Jensen
Milbert
Pat. ki
Uphu.
Carlson, L.
Johnson,A
Minna
Pe n
Vanasok
Carruthers
Johnson, R.
Morrison
a
Vellenga
Clark
Kahn
Mm er
inn
Vose
Cwper
Kalis
Murphy
Wagewus
Daunm
Kelly
Nelson, C.
Tear'
We
DeBlieck
Kelso
Nelson, D.
River..
%.I
Dempsey
Kinkel
Nelson, K.
Rukavi�m
Rioter
Dille
Kludt
Neuew
er Sarna
Wynta
Forsythe
Knuth
O'Connor
Scheid
Spk. N.M.
The motion did not prevail and trte amendment was not adopted
Gruenes was
Himle moved to amend H. F`t[ 1219, the first engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
line 17, delete", -cebtlpla ofamuaementown
adopted.
H. F. No. 1219, A bill lb/ an act relating to taxation; authorizing
Scott county to impose tax on admissions to major amusement ,
facilities; providing for expenditure of the proceeds of the tax.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon
its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was
called. There were 94 yeas and 26 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were: C
Anderson, G.
Carlson, L.
Hugoson
Katie
Lieder
Battaglia
Carruthers
Jacob.
Kelly
long
Bauerly
Clark
Jame
Kelso
M.
Heard
Cceper
Jefferson
KiNcel
M,Eachw
Beguh
Danner
Jennings
Kludt
Milbert
Bennett
DeBlieck
Jen.en
Knuth
Minne
Bertram
Dempsey
Johnson, A.
Kosmhrys
Morrison
B.
MIT
Johnson, R.
Krueger
Munger
Brown
Greenfield
Johnson, V
Larsen
Murphy
Burger
Hartle
Kahn
Lesley
Nelson, C.
112
5418
Joumgsu oy Tax House
[53rd Day
Those who voted in the negative were:
Hugosen
F.H.
Anderson, G.
Greenfield
Knewbry.
0gre n
Sdrcevfeld
Bottaglis
Gruen'
Krueger
Olsen, S.
Olson, E.
Segal
Simoneau
Bauarly
Himle
Lmaev
Begich
Beard
Hussain
Lasky
Olson, K.
Solberg
Begirb
Jacobs
Lkder
Osthoff
Sparby
Bertram
Jams
Innnsg
Otis
St mbnma
Boo
Jefferson
McEech.
Pappas
/
B.
Jennings
McLaughlin
Pauly
7Lnheim /\
Burger
Jessen
Milbert
Minns
Pelowski
Peterson
Wbue
"=e°k
Carlson, L.
Johaam A.
Carruthers
J.1come, R.
Morrison
Price
Vellenga
Clark
Kahn
Mrs'ser
Qui
Voss
Cwper
Kali.
MmpvY
Reding
Waggee.ius
Darner
Kelly
Ne14 C.
Rice
V7.
DeBlieck
Kelso
Nelson, D.
Riveness
Wenzel
Dempsey
Kinkel
Nelson, K.
Rcilim ma
Winter
Dille
Kludt
Nueenschoomder
Sarna
Wynia
Forsythe
Knuth
O'Connor
Scheid
Spit. Norton
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted
Gruenes was excused while in conference.
Himle moved to amend H. F. No. 1219, the fust engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 17, delete " exceDt a lD ace of amusement owne _
Scott County agricultural come -t
[ e motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
H. F. No. 1219, A bill for an act relating to taxation; authorizing
Scott county to impose a tax on admissions to major amusement
facilities; providing for expenditure of the proceeds of the tax.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon
its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was
called. There were 94 yeas and 26 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
C
Anderson, G.
Carlson, L.
Hugosen
F.H.
Lieder
Battaglia
Carruthers
Jambs
Keay
Kelso
lung
Marsh
Bauery
Beard
Clark
Cooper
Jame
Jefferson
Kinkel
McEarhern
Begich
Danner
Jennings
Kludt
Milben
Bennett
Bertram
DeBlierk
Dempsey
Jensen
Johnson, A.
Knuth
Kosmh
mi..
Morrison
'
1`
Boo
Dille
Johnson,R.
Krueger
Munger
Broom
Burger
Greenfield
Hartle
Johnson, V.
Kahn
Larsen
Lesley
Murphy
Nelson, C.
5418
Jopawu of rae House
[53rd Day
Those who voted in the negative were:
Hugoson
Kali.
Anderson, G.
Greenfield
KostAryr
Ogrxn
Schoenfeld
Battagglia
Groans
Krueger
Olsen, S.
Segal
Bauerly
Hinds
Larsen
Olson, E.
Simurom.
Beard
Hugoson
Lesley
Olson, K.
Solberg
Hegich
Jambs
Lieder
Oathaff
Sparby
Bertram
Jams
Long
Otis
Steenema
Boo
Jefferson
Mc&achero
Pa
'Trimble /
B.
Jermings
McLaughlin
Pauly
Tunheire C
Burrgger
Janie.
A
Milbert
Minne
Pelowski
Peterson
Op k
Yanase
Carlmn, L.
Carruthers
Johnson,
Johnson, R.
Morrimn
Prim
Vellenga
Clark
Kahn
Munger
QWon
Vose
Cwper
Kalis
Murph➢
Redia,
o„ius
Deaner
Belly
NeLmn, C.
Rice
We e
DeBlieck
Kelm
Nelson, D.
Rivecros
Wenzel
Dempsey
Kinkel
Nelson: K
Ruk.Ans
winter
Dille
Khedt
Nownsci sander
Sarin
Wynia
Forsythe
Knuth
O'Cormor
Scheid
Spk. Norton
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted
Gruenes was excused while in conference.
Himle moved to amend H. F. No. 1219, the first engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
�FlagellineNdelete” eaTptaIp aceofamusementownedTate,
cultural
l The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
H. F. No. 1219, A bill for an act relating to taxation; authorizing
Scott county to impose a tax on admissions to major amusement
facilities; providing for expenditure of the proceeds of the tax.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon
its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was
called. There were 94 yeas and 26 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
C
Anderson, G.
Carlson, L.
Hugoson
Kali.
Lieder
Battagglia
Carruthers
Jambe
Jam
Kelly
Kelm
long
Mareh
Bauerly
Beard
Clark
Cooper
Jefferson
Kinkel
McEachera
Begich
Dauner
Jennings
Block
Milhert
Bennett
DeElleck
Jensen
Knuth
Minae
Bertram
Dempsey
Johnson, A.
Kaaahrys
Boo
Dille
Johnson, R.
Krueger
Munger
Brown
Greenfield
Johnson, V.
Kahn
Larsen
Lasley
New., C.
Burger
Hartle
0
Dempsey was excused while in conference.
S. F. No. 90 was reported to the House.
Knuth and Bishop moved to amend S. R No. 90, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
`PIPELINE ROUTING
Section 1. [116I.015] [ROUTING OF CERTAIN PIPELINES.]
Subdivision 1. [DEFINITION.] For sea of this section and
notwt—'t cling section 1 i(ii.ol, subdivision 3, p - nemeans:
(1) t ee with a nominal diameter of six inches or more that is
de�ar uued to trauspoHiiarTous�i�uia.aTut�notrude ptpe
sadead i ed to transport a Em ord us ligm ��avttY d its
designed to tran�s rt or store�ardous Iigutd within a -m -fining,
storage, or manufacturinTcnTity; or
C(2)pt designed to be operated at a pressure of more than 275
ads per square inch and to carr- as.
Solid. 2. [PROHIBITION.] A person may not construct a pi el�ine
witT a pi�eli�ne rou�tin permit issued by the romnental
g=rty board unless theit peline is exe�m teed -from t tt a oat' 18
routing aut tl�-Ont under this seetion or rules adopted under a
section. A ip peline uui Perri IneY on eb conatru� on a
route designated h, e
53rd Day]
FsmaY, MAY 15, 1957
5419
Nelson, D.
Otis
Rest
Solberg
Vellengs
C
Nelson, K.
Ozerent
Rim
SParby
W es
Neuenachwander Pappppeeee
Riva.Stnniva
Wagenius
acconar
Pelowaki
Rukavuaa
Steensma
Welle
Oggreren
Peterson
Same
Swe�on
Wenzel
Olaon, E.
Price
Scheid
Trimble
Winter
OLmn, K.Quiet
Schoenfeld
7unhebn
wynia
Omsnn
Redalen
Segal
Uphus
Spk. Norton
Oethoff
Reding
Simone.
Vamaek
CThose
who voted in the negative were:
C'suanitzer
Heapp
Omen
Seaberg
valeem
Nbzayytth�¢¢
KnirB 6.1cer
Poppenhegen
Shaver
Wait..
''
Ftederick
McKaey
Qmet
Skoglmd
Frerichs
McRz.
Richter
Sore`
Gutkuecht
Miller
Schafer
Thiede
Haukoos
Olsen, S.
Schreiber
7fornbom
The bill was passed,
as amended, and
its title agreed to.
Dempsey was excused while in conference.
S. F. No. 90 was reported to the House.
Knuth and Bishop moved to amend S. R No. 90, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
`PIPELINE ROUTING
Section 1. [116I.015] [ROUTING OF CERTAIN PIPELINES.]
Subdivision 1. [DEFINITION.] For sea of this section and
notwt—'t cling section 1 i(ii.ol, subdivision 3, p - nemeans:
(1) t ee with a nominal diameter of six inches or more that is
de�ar uued to trauspoHiiarTous�i�uia.aTut�notrude ptpe
sadead i ed to transport a Em ord us ligm ��avttY d its
designed to tran�s rt or store�ardous Iigutd within a -m -fining,
storage, or manufacturinTcnTity; or
C(2)pt designed to be operated at a pressure of more than 275
ads per square inch and to carr- as.
Solid. 2. [PROHIBITION.] A person may not construct a pi el�ine
witT a pi�eli�ne rou�tin permit issued by the romnental
g=rty board unless theit peline is exe�m teed -from t tt a oat' 18
routing aut tl�-Ont under this seetion or rules adopted under a
section. A ip peline uui Perri IneY on eb conatru� on a
route designated h, e
f
R R q` p y C i P •^.. S p R �+ a R+ G O S i` W G N 4+. 4 0� n C rt C 4_ C a3i a A .n.. C
°30,OnV AAO�O^R°V �p 2qq A'?N n^qR°C.R 4R SR Aq'�Na�NyU is
4A yp�
A �m sg �3woao $D_oy Cy�m nomnoA `-`°n c. „o cSeoa � 3a=p�°c°-]
n Am eGpot3 mpA 03Po'oso SSr 303`n3G q�yG a`e Fnym�b �°cD jZ3,om
j°n P^i oj3 W=a 9�O=y CV?C S3S �O Aa4m� 2r ��: `+^C T1
n rt C] CP nPo O' A +•c m. s^� °sAsX ;y 34y
oo�F'n0 v°,e v,H O S sti A'0 pA Pn" m '�'� p�'0 p
ap
F O O
mnO .n33 `^n0 �^ .SAO FC`gp l-R«SOq OnAS GR<^0m qZ Rn+C
Om A v9 e.3'1D
^n^CO D
3,0wa�3,m
Poi= g.3�
P y +ns O n ti4 o A o'o"W n..
=.i 4a aPo 4...np P3 OGm r3nA F Ric 'A RO!`iO3 °m v_3..`<Rr
3 'y�ortm d A'Y 4m�pT
O� +O lF' ^y nPo .A O'^ N pR A33R°i O n3 •ti.c
N,O+ a4a0 3 y O^3 R3Y_ O ya S,OAp'O
• Po F EAPo �4 b. Oa C eA ^O Q.. � ;� �ep�O pV `e P44
3� Cao 00 An Appy On'�y p ° 'ert< a n� 3
ay 3T.^ m ^<R NyO .�?ii 4N A A°+pAC Qr 4_3 O'YF<
An
4A 10_Rl °� p 3l° SAP D] rt a] 3�Qn l p0°•n
3 P •^ _ u3i 3 a y b Dy n n q F 4
ei C��� j.F3 _49 Fy° ppA C �d Y� ° Cy oa. 04Ha
F 3 v,
4
_n a � �nu� a: -T nmmmmm}a mho � N 3y
o i.nno T W W S W'O
o'-�3ww'�m'e o n rt w.•n A
o^6Z Qm T. Wp T°, oZ m E m o a ^Z
m e PN H, o c '' n ,o E_ prv-
uo3.x3_ a'o'o�Em�m3-°
p,rt
�o Eo y° o. -•° n<_. �'� = E .� - 0 3 'm nim
3" d A H 'ry °i. m a :.OR-
jG
6^:.".n.<o d pp ^e . R a
a z Qoaz°,"w o7El
w 4 0 o q m o ow
n3^ oma I%1 n n ti,mm^ t�+f 33A�
oo w tv ry n^ F 3 m v m
m m WE o'o oZ .. Qy m.T'o [A
^n xmm m0 aQ�., g.°3 F �T3:=A�°. w n d m<: x H .w
3-. k f1� 60w ma H WN Aa 6 v ?. i
9El
m Nm m� Cu0i6-'dO 9 3 6 d O6
�ooFE<mc�
m9 n_ti 3c.7 o E ��..
o
m�2.
O EL
`wG NC—_
ry P n ai O_ O ry 6 U d� P d 6 0
R
A
S
i
j
y�°�oa � o0
c`o C`c°�°no N`v ro d
`�`ny iv 4oda dN 2aoa e �
� mob" bF� ,+ye=°m`de 4tia Q Q 4
un ToSo
�aj0n £000
nNNN £fOON
SWNNN C anh^t
f9WW(9 Qb NWNW NM 04 GCO =.�
i' [�y0 aoy0 CacgQ tlp [VOJOS� i o �00 v tly`6.°`£J
"
cd y 3 y E dNOgog ° °po
F ��Q �Sj Z y0 b0vi °aT ^NhN Ld Nh0 W> y2Nd�a
v� n i
O "Awes bb -�
oy£c vbo=yd rn3vo N sw=ZQ� Zoy 4°Oco Ivo
'o`cc°y 3` �Po. hyad yCy Q¢J iv" Z ;.'Ec 2
> d
'y -
c
[
no W v
=^ _�
i'p`ry v
S as OE p;Nso
NO�o
c
r 2 - masa oac°�-` a.o�o yo i as
E: v %6 '_ „�:� �=� o h m x U mb i v y ♦ o h° y
p - u M c c v O v C > Nn d]Q'-v [ ro •,dyoy na i `
a=v _v G Acx o.�vNo =Zv�b�b Ec pC
y N cu. 4-C b 0 „%O, O C 0 3 E 0
3 o^Y� �v I.-
9Ec o3 ay oyv yi a'3 N�yi y>^'
NGM Cu>U1LLLLL �j❑6 xlh.a9Y
a_ c _c
IE E
a'
vL' 6 m mi r o po` o cE�Ev LL _ u yi '�uz Mub Ki -c dac
1
oo. o
CO
_ � ti\3 pp 8 pp pppp
Y v a Y3 � a Hi � Y � j3 O 0000 x"000
_ion
` y y • a ` a 4 `O r�:In
30 0.3 C'zS wwNwWq=C�=-
`F'e`
-
H wwwww y °9 www 3�
`~ ~i�-h3 v
3a�av 3^�i qh a�33�"� 2n. 3i3iC.F
a a
� C u 3 a x m 6• � 3 5, a Y p
dm u
c m —
o
- v E c z
. d A w ^� uC_ r N O OCNC C~nGyC h^CG f C�
`v, c�n`hca`mZ C P W F,C34 IN�'`00 N_OCa'� Ni
c o A u p ry udi I Z
.�.a E�'nT3 yBy UAZ db N_O_'=O 203CE4 o`S°yam SL
Z.
U
t d E ms c c = ¢ =o ;e'G °ruo.i ae'a YC3 is
_ p -a -
.Z. _ = r m=_':fii8i = w u
- v u y -a �y c
Fq V O O Z O
_ C g tl=bOtiF
_3r=m000u v _cv-..c o3 S.F :`e y
Ec_
E t y Ste- na-.. .ou y= 5Ya3 n.
U= y.�mO AjVILLLY. �p0112..Y39Y Z3a 1T COG 13 C'�w'
uPES
iv` dare^'z its c�°d V
m m E :o d o o "u�Eu d LL. v dm �tnt= 4liyy�C� tjis axC :y
�-
I
P p 3 E
�o aN Oo
u cLL ou 'c 0. -0
L� 3
° EEmo 4i inc do„ 5c mucu'E�oE.W.a9c Qww""'o'aOoiove,ouoc-. rnu�6
h�v>
0v.. W>Y"a.aa
c
mvoWu.>.'U .
04
Z 0 bLa m
h
ou"Eo m Oao
z U Wry t C T
= 4°" t d F U iO� O 5 t .. m o> u E -.L e W u c ,.. m .n •.. G y 5
-'Z
iQC.%F' EY3uC ox��zppp cia' zfa=CEqui FF0W' �9xG Oo. u°p�mmC.��cwummCEa aN(¢NWoJ-N=O.d.
R
oa . .cuZ E_ o oVU
yy9 »o.>o y1O
Eoyg O y YYdovuO 0.ti5y: aE
z_ i% LE -s EW�
emy W 'L ed 'm$9
U 'J to Wt L9TOw.�O Cj za -¢v9LC9 cL
Z G Z Q ow
o
.'
'CuO .Er�e'` d.W,"� OW iOc mU G w�=n YY'.Wm: u9`.-;OWa�E6 WmCG�6'yd�.dU WyD�VNG>•.9>O'_^-00,l EO,l
W ZY
W O oso' .2
W ZW ��= wua ff°
O �u chaOecuaW$a
'acue CU zQc ocdwypvuo. tpvZ
O9
mT�oW
QL WCCC T
d
ZEyE
mm �Eomnwy.
QO d c s ya d ac o�'E
O " m uvS {GV y�ANL C=
u
r <'i csmm` ud o= i rn� £v camacu3yP=�-mw�°�= C
c W
'� p N V� � .. 'E O d u G •O =5
Lc E v o p =.io %&
v. .� c 'O y = yyh 33
[ c
`c
a e o w
F o o g pUO m 3 9 c Fib
Z ry ro ,.� o 0 o E c 4 v -0 e a cd c
�i EE. W
v 3 Z
E
S aopg •p V,Q L d 'W 0._ W �[ y G c C y E I W U
o`aw w mIE
UO .o M roa >tl o° E- E .W :T C.
c $ 7-
0
a
>. h i a m a M E E y4 [ O y 3 m x r$ o
Z www a i"' ��= a �;io r o '. tl s `[ ti s
F �Vo"m 3 r v o W a o v o o t = .W = o t W x�.Y3Sii
zz
,%
O h O[ U E[ W d C � E mo ry Y d N p u 6 N Y 'A L•
r i=o u z v°eo OOp u: w"N c'O^ t p'`e 92Uyvfcl
[. 4 V N >�o '� Y 4 U d V �• > ASO LL2.°iY
d N 44•,d ^1 h �OV �yP L WOP
U O �. a N C a O O_ 3 •_ �I
L E y U G ^ d y W v E Z
m 4 00 CO L m' E w U d O E ui
F .2 4 m i s 4' E E
`a�m "m6u
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Administrative Assistant
RE: Scott County Regional Railroad Authority
DATE: May 27, 1987
Introduction
On May 19, 1987 the Scott County Board of Commissioners held a
public hearing to consider the formation of a Regional Railroad
Authority for Scott County. Following the public hearing the
Scott County Board moved to establish a Scott County Regional
Railroad Authority.
Background
Within the last six months, Hennepin County has been working to
establish a light rail transit line along the southwest corridor
from Minneapolis to Victoria. The proposed line will be run
along abandoned railroad lines. Hennepin County is proceeding
with this plan through their County Regional Railroad Authority.
Recognizing that in the future there may be a need for light rail
transit service in Scott County, the Scott County Board of
Commissioners moved to create a Scott County Regional Railroad
Authority. The primary purpose of the railroad authority would
be to protect the county from the intrusion of private parties
who may want to acquire abandoned railroad lines. Under the
provisions of the Regional Railroad Authorities Act, county
regional railroad authorities have the right of first refusal to
acquire abandoned railroad lines. This arrangement would provide
Scott County with some control over future uses of potentially
abandoned railroad lines, i.e. trails, light rail transit, etc.
The Regional Railroad Authority does not have the power to impose
a tax on local residents to fund their operations. However, the
Authority could request to impose a mill levy upon an approved
referendum of the voters.
BAS/jms
/D
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Administrative Assistant
RE: Relocation of Recycling Drop -Off Site
DATE: May 27, 1987
Introduction
The recycling drop-off site that is utilized in conjunction with
our curb side recycling program is presently located in the
Senior High parking lot. I have been informed by school
officials that we will be unable to continue our use of the
school parking lot for the recycling drop-off site effective
immediately.
Background
On May 13, 1987 staff was informed by school officials that the
City of Shakopee would no longer be able to use the Senior High
parking lot as their curb side recycling drop-off site. Over the
past years we have experienced problems with paper that has been
set along side the storage containers after the recycling day has
been completed. When this situation occurs, paper blows all over
the parking lot and students are driving over the paper, etc.
Because the Senior High parking lot is very visible, many
residents bring their paper to the drop-off site after the
recycling day has been completed. The Senior High parking lot
also has limited capacity for student parking.
For the past two weeks staff has been trying to identify
alternative recycling drop-off sites in the community. At this
time, the best site that I can come up with is behind the Public
Works garage along the compound fence. Staff believes that this
area is suitable because it is centrally located within the
community and has a paved surface. Additionally, the site does
not receive heavy traffic exposure. This fact should eliminate
some of the problems that we have been experiencing with people
dropping off their recyclable materials after the recycling day.
I have been in contact with the Public works Superintendent and
he does not have a problem with this plan. The containers are
dropped off by Waste Management Inc. on the day prior to the
recycling pickup (Friday). They are picked up by Waste
Management on the following Tuesday.
Overall, I think the new drop-off site is more advantageous to
the success of the recycling program than our previous site.
Staff is preparing a marketing campaign to re-educate the public
as to the location of the new drop-off site.
BAS/jms
�1
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer'
SUBJECT: Killarney Hills Addition
Lots Purchased for Bypass
DATE: May 26, 1987
At the public hearing for proposed improvements to Killarney
Hills Addition, the question was raised regarding properties that
were purchased for the Bypass right-of-way. The City
participated in a Met Council program for the preservation of
highway rights-of-way. The mechanics of that program is such
that the Met Council loans money from a revolving fund to Cities
for the purchase of properties within officially mapped highways.
The purpose of the program is to preserve the property in an
undeveloped state.
At the time the City purchased the properties in Killarney Hills,
the criteria for qualification was the property must be partially
or wholly within the mapped right-of-way. Current criteria is
that if there is an economic remnant of the property, the
property must be split into two parcels and only the parcel
within the mapped right-of-way qualifies for the program.
KA/pmp
ROW
/3
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Engineero-
SUBJECT: Monthly Project Status Report
DATE: May 29, 1987
The following projects were worked on last month by construction
forces.
Fourth Avenue - This project is nearing completion. Sodding
seems to be moving slow but they are doing a nice job now that
they have been instructed to replace 2 1/2 blocks of sodding
completed last fall.
Valley Park Drive North - This project was completed last month.
Upon determinationofthe value of the right-of-way taking, the
assessments can be prepared.
Second Avenue Parking Lot - All work has been completed now that
the lights are functioning.
T.H. 101/C.R. 83 Signals - Work is proceeding on this project.
Work will suspend soon in waiting for delivery of the controller
and most arms.
Hauer's Fourth Addition - Work is progressing on utilities within
this subdivision.
Bids were received on the Parks Improvement Project and Mn/DOT
authorized the advancement of the 13th Avenue project (C.R. 89 to
the East) to bid letting. Engineering is still waiting on Mn/DOT
to complete the 10th Avenue Overlay specifications. With federal
funds involved, Mn/DOT must formalize the specifications based
upon our plans and requested special provisions.
The feasibility reports for the 13th Avenue (C.R. 16 to C.R. 17)
project and VIP sanitary sewer extension are in progress and
should be ready for Council review shortly.
Plan development for the Downtown Redevelopment Project is
progressing on schedule. A July 9th bid letting is being
anticipated.
The Timber Trails Project, Fourth Avenue Project, Hauer's Fourth
Addition, and the Parks Improvement Project is scheduled for
completion next month.
KA/pmp
STATUS
Ij
-------.-----.-----.-------------------------.-----;----
!
I
,Wo
I
a�
;
! ! ;
!
!
.
1
d I I
I
,
e
1
=
I
'
I
!
!_-�
: I !
i
i ;
!
c
• : :
:
ire
3
i
! I
e !
1
I
• s 1 m I
,
e
---
_
i
S
W$ I W
1
__ I __ -_
__
__
_____________
_.
!
i
a
____
---
_ _---
_____-_-_____
---- _-_
z
e
- i
-- -- - -- --
'
---
--- -
- -
--
---- -
-- ---
a iffis ! m
m I
I
a
n
,
-
m
! ! -
i
a
-
! m
i
:
I
- -
co- -'-i -
nm Z.
s
:gado
edi<
v
/3
--------------
----------
-
a 1
_
S
--
--
i
----
�
- -- -- -
1
- --
-= -=
- - ----------
s i
t
I
i
a y i i
i
'----------
S i
1
;
_____
5 i
1
,
;
i____--
i
i
-
m 1
a
a
1
__-_._______
---
___----
_-_______
I
m
t
1
;
I
e
m'm
- -
_
I
mS
•
a :
I
m
^
- -
S
I Y
S
-__i
i
^
,
-
---- -----;
--
----
-- ---
- m -;-
�
i-
1
^
�
_
... -
_
-
-
^
e ----
;
-
_
-
m
c
e
-
- —
m
i
€
i
;
'-
-
-----
----
------
-----
----
--
----
m
;
m i
,
;
i
=�'a
nog
^ i
=nag
is
em
was
m
WRE
tae
meg
x e
W j��as
W a�
:m_vo
_v
;
s
zoe
Ydv
>3
m
o
i
N
c
N
N
Q
N
P+
W
d
m
�
Y+
Q
is
F
F
V]
o
OD N E
F
F
r E O
90
rtn
M U r
moo•
O
�
G9
v c
3 a
q�.
..c+ a
,ui m
G m F �+ O
C E O O
F 1+ N w 0
3 EMU O
U m w E r
U r rU+ ✓1
M
6
H
oo
T o
.Ti
0
U r
N
�a
N
Qi
Q
y
v E
O
u u a
�o
w � s
4
A
co
co
/G
TENTATIVE AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular Session Shakopee, MN June 4, 1987
Chairwoman VanMaldeghem Presiding
1. Roll Call at 7:30 P.M.
2. Approval of Agenda
3. 8:15 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider the
preliminary plat of Heritage Place lying on the property
located westerly of Hauer's 3rd Addition, Southerly of
J.E.J. 2nd Addition and Hauer's 2nd Addition.
Applicant: Heritage Development
Action: Recommendation to City Council
4. 8:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider the
application for a Conditional Use Permit for a home
occupation for a dance school and theatre in the barn
located behind the dwelling at 1830 Marschall Road.
Applicant: Theodore and Sharon Hinck
Action: Conditional Use Permit Resolution #489
5. 8:40 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the application
for a Conditional Use Permit to operate an open sales lot
(flea market) upon the 36 acres located east of Valleyfair.
Applicant: Bart Bradford
Action: Conditional Use Permit Resolution #490
6. 8:50 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the application
for a Conditional Use Permit to allow liquid bulk storage in
above ground tanks upon the property located at 3251 East
Highway 101.
Applicant: Peavey Company
Action: Conditional Use Permit Resolution #491
7. 9:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the application
for a Conditional Use Permit to operate an outdoor music
center as a minor commerical recreational facility upon 86
acres located N. of 12th Ave. W. of Valley Park Drive, S.
of Valley Industrial Blv S. and E. of the K -Mart
Distribution Center on Cou y Road 83.
Applicant: S ottland ompanies
Action: Conditi nal a Permit Resolution #492
8. Preliminary Plat o H rizon Heights 4th Addition.
Action: Recommend ion to City Council
9. Request for Final D. Approval for Stonebrooke
Action: Recommen at on to City Council
10. Discussion: a. Sco tland - Convention Center
b.
11. Other Business
a.
b.
12. Adjourn
Douglas Wise
City Planner
16
7. 9:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the application
for T Conditional Use Permit to operate an outdoor music
center as a minor commerical recreational facility upon 86
acres located N. of 12th Ave., W. of Valley Park Drive, S.
of Valley Industrial Blvd. S. and E. of the K -Mart
Distribution Center on County Road 83.
Applicant: Scottland companies
Action: conditional Use Permit Resolution #492
S. Preliminary Plat of Horizon Heights 4th Addition.
Action: Recommendation to City Council
9. Request for Final P.U.D. Approval for Stonebrooke
Action: Recommendation to City Council
10. Discussion: a. Scottland - Convention Center
b.
11. Other Business
a.
b.
12. Adjourn
Douglas Wise
City Planner
TENTATIVE AGENDA
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
Regular Session Shakopee, FIN June 4, 1987
Chairwoman Van Maldeghem Presiding
1. Roll Call at 7:30 P.M.
2. Approval of Agenda
3. 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING• An appeal of the administrative
rulings by staff regarding the uses of the property located
at 1199 Quincy Street.
Appellant: Gerald Schesso
Action: Appeal Resolution #494
4. 7:45 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: An appeal of the interpretation
of the zoning ordinance regarding the use of temporary
construction buildings as living quarters upon the property
located at 232 Marschall Road.
Appellant: Burdette W. Smythe, PACE Development Co.
Action: Appeal Resolution #495
5. 8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider a request for a
Variance to reduce the required parking stall requirements
from 40 to 34 for the proposed addition the the existing
Aamco Transmission Shop at 630 First Ave. East.
Applicant: Breckenridge Development Corporation
Action: Variance Resolution #493
6. Other Business
7. Adjourn
Douglas K. Wise
City Planner
/7
Shakopee Coalition - Meeting Minutes
May 7, 1987
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 A.M. by Chairman Brian
Norris in the Citizens State Bank Committee Room. Members
present: Jerry Knutson (MN Correctional Facility), George
Muenchow (Shakopee Community Services), Don Hamilton (Southern
Valley Alliance for Battered women), Mary Ann Kibbler (Scott
County Extension Service), Claude Kob (Knights of Columbus),
Sister Jo Lambert (St. Francis Regional Medical Center), Dennis
Hron (Lions Club), Karen Martin (Shakopee Chamber of Commerce),
and Barry Stock (City of Shakopee). Members introduced
themselves. A representative from the Food Shelf was not present
to give an update on the food shelf activities for April.
Chairman Norris stated that the Coalition is continuing it's
efforts in making the helping hands column in the newspaper a
success. Mary Ann Kibbler questioned what kind of response rate
the column has been receiving in it's solicitation of volunteers.
Jerry Knutson stated that they had not done any formal follow-up
on those people that have been using the column but that they
were planning on doing it in the near future.
In an effort to increase the awareness of the helping hands
column, Chairman Norris suggested sending a letter to each of the
volunteer organizations in the community explaining the purpose
of the helping hands column. He also stated that we should not
be discouraged because these types of things take a long time to
develop. Mary Ann Kibbler questioned if the column was just for
volunteers in Shakopee. Chairman Norris stated that anyone in
the area who was in need of volunteers could use the column.
Members were encouraged to get their stories to Jerry Knutson and
to spread the word about the helping hands column. The deadline
for the next column is May 14th. It was suggested that until the
column becomes more successful that we publish some of the crisis
numbers in the space rather than not having anything at all.
Chairman Norris requested that the Coalition review the 1987
objectives. Mr. Norris reviewed the three main functions of the
Shakopee Coalition. He then stated that the objectives of the
Coalition were broken down into the following four categories:
1. Volunteer Issues, 2. Economic Development, 3. Family Needs
and 4. Community Needs.
The Committee then reviewed the objectives under the volunteer
issues category. It was the consensus of the group to continue
with the volunteer issues column. Karen Martin stated that she
is doing a show on KCHK radio every morning at 9:20 and she would
be then happy to make announcements regarding volunteer issues on
her program. She also stated that if anyone would like to appear
on her show they should contact her. Discussion ensued on the
volunteer recognition event that was recently held at the
American Legion.
The Coalition then reviewed the objectives under the economic
development category. Barry Stock suggested that perhaps the
coalition could look at the possibility of organizing a annual
clean-up campaign that utilized all of the community
organizations in Shakopee. He suggested that the community could
be split up into quadrants and that each community organization
could be assigned a quadrant and.be responsible for picking up
litter within that quadrant. Thi event could be planned to
coincide with the City's recycling day and the City's annual
clean-up campaign. Discussion sued on the clean-up idea. It
was the consensus of the gr ou to investigate this issue further
at later meetings and plan o getting a program started in 1988.
Mr. Stock then questioned
would be interested in
businesses in the d
attractive. Sever
the responsibility
own buildings.
coalition could s
encouraging them to
Barry Stock then
redevelopment prof
any of the volunteer organizations
oviding man power to paint some of the
area in an effort to make it more
the Coalition members felt that it was
Property owners to take care of their
n Norris suggested that perhaps the
each of the property owners a letter
eup their buildings. Discussion ensued.
xp ined the timing for the downtown
and ini by-pass.
The Committee th n discuss d the issues under the family needs
objectives. n Hamilton stated that the Shakopee valley
Alliance for btered women has been growing the last few years
and that they ave been su cessful in meeting their program
objectives.
The Coalition/ then reviewed land discussed the community needs
objectives.
Chairman Norris stated that he wld not be able to attend the
next meeting and that he would co tact John Anderson to see if he
was available to Chair the meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 8:10 A.M.
Barry A. Stock
Recording Secretary
The Coalition then reviewed the objectives under the economic
development category. Barry Stock suggested that perhaps the
coalition could look at the possibility of organizing a annual
clean-up campaign that utilized all of the community
organizations in Shakopee. He suggested that the community could
be split up into quadrants and that each community organization
could be assigned a quadrant and be responsible for picking up
litter within that quadrant. The event could be planned to
coincide with the City's recycling day and the City's annual
clean-up campaign. Discussion ensued on the clean-up idea. it
was the consensus of the group to investigate this issue further
at later meetings and plan on getting a program started in 1988.
Mr. Stock then questioned if any of the volunteer organizations
would be interested in providing man power to paint some of the
businesses in the downtown area in an effort to make it more
attractive. Several of the Coalition members felt that it was
the responsibility of the property owners to take care of their
own buildings. Chairman Norris suggested that perhaps the
coalition could send each of the property owners a letter
encouraging them to clean-up their buildings. Discussion ensued.
Barry Stock then explained the timing for the downtown
redevelopment project and mini by-pass.
The Committee then discussed the issues under the family needs
objectives. Don Hamilton stated that the Shakopee Valley
Alliance for battered women has been growing the last few years
and that they have been successful in meeting their program
objectives.
The Coalition then reviewed and discussed the community needs
objectives.
Chairman Norris stated that he would not be able to attend the
next meeting and that he would contact John Anderson to see if he
was available to Chair the meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 8:10 A.M.
Barry A. Stock
Recording Secretary
0A•
ROBERT J. SCHMITZ
Senator 36th District
6730 Old Hwy. 169 Blvd.
Jordan, Minnesota 55352
Phone: 492-2182
Office:
235 State Capitol
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Phone: 296-7157
May 27, 1987
RECEIVED
MAY91981
-
CITY OF SHAKOPEE Senate
Mr. John K. Anderson
City Administrator
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
State of Minnesota
Dear John:
Thank you for your letter stating the Shakopee City Council's
position regarding local government aid cuts in transit and
transportation funding.
I did not want to respond to you until the Omnibus Tax Bill was
confereed. Local government aid levels are frozen at current
levels, plus a 3 percent levy limit has been established.
I did support the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax funds to be
transferred to the Minnesota Department of Transportation,
keeping in mind the many construction projects we have on the
drawing board for Shakopee and Scott County. We all hope there
will be an upturn in the economy so we can restore some of the
cuts that had to be made in 1987.
If I can be of further assistance, please contact me again.
Since 1y,
ROBERT J. SCHMITZ
State Senator -- District 36
RJS/st
COMMITTEES • Chairman, Loeal and Urban Government • Rules and Administration • Transportation
Veterans • Taxes and Tax Laws • SUBCOMMITTEES • Property Taxes and Local Government Aids
COMMISSION: Legislative Commission to Review Administrative Rules
KFl
Memo To: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
From: Marilyn M. Remer, Personnel Coordinator)/pY+
Re: Comparable Worth Survey Results (Informational)
Date: May 29, 1987
Attached is the results of a MAMA survey of the cities that
participated in the Control Data Comparable Worth Study.
On June 2, 1987 there will be a Comparable Worth Information
Fair at Brooklyn Center providing an opportunity for all
jurisdictions to get together to exchange ideas and information
on various methods that have been used in implementling the
Comparable Worth Act. An update will be provided following
that meeting.
COMPARABLE WORTH SURVEY RESULTS
May 4, 1987
1. Have you released point values or job hierarchies?
Yes No
65 39
Those organizations who have released:
Metro
Anoka
Apple Valley
Blaine
Brooklyn Center
Brooklyn Park
Burnsville
Chaska
Cold Spring
Coon Rapids
Cottage Grove
Crystal
Eagan
Eden Prairie
Excelsior
Outstate
Austin Utilities
Bemidji
Benson
Brainard
Faribault
Hibbing Utilities
International Falls
Litchfield
Fergus Falls
Forest Lake
Golden Valley
Hastings
Hopkins
Inver Grove Heights
Lino Lakes
Maple Grove
Maplewood
Mendota Heights
Minnetonka
Minnetrista
Monticello
Moundsview
Litchfield Utilities
Marshall Utilities
Morris
North Mankato
Pine Island
Pipestone
Preston
Red Wing
Those organizations who have not released:
Metro
Bloomington
Champlin
Delano
Fridley
Mound
Outstate
Alexandria Utilities
Austin
Brainard Utilities
Breckenridge
Cloquet
Detroit Lakes
East Grand Forks
East Grand Forks Utilities
Metro Airport Commission
New Hope
Oakdale
Rosemount
Roseville
Glencoe
Hibbing
Hutchinson Utilities
Little Falls
Mankato
Minnesota Valley Library
Moorhead Utilities
New Ulm
�l
North St. Paul
Orono
Plymouth
Prior Lake
Richfield
Robbinsdale
St. Louis Park
Savage
Shakopee
Waconia
Waseca
West St. Paul
White Bear Lake
Woodbury
Sartel1
Sauk Ranids
Spring Valley Utilities
Thief River Falls
Virginia Utilities
Willmar
Willmar Municipal Utilities
Shoreview
St. Anthony
St. Paul Park
Wayzata
New Ulm Utilities
Moorhead
Mora
North West Regional Library
Northfield
St. Cloud
St. James
St. Peter
Virginia
2. Have you sent in the State Report?
Yes No
18 88
Those who have sent in report:
Alexandria Utilities
Apple Valley
Austin Utilities
Cold Spring
Fridley
Hibbing
Hibbing Utilities
Moundsview
Northfield
Pipestone
Preston
Sartell
3. Have approved a compensation system?
Yes No
23 83
Those that have•
Apple Valley
Bloomington
Brooklyn Park
Champlin
Cold Spring
Eagan
Excelsior
Fergus Falls
Forest Lake
Hibbing Utilities
International Falls
Little Falls
Marshall Utilities
Minnetrista
Orono
Pine Island
Total Responses - 102 out of 130
Z/
Shakopee
Spring Valley Utilities
St. Louis Park
Virginia Utilities
Waseca
Willmar Utilities
Pipestone
Sartell
Shakopee
St. Louis Park
Waconia
Waseca
Willmar Utilities
TENTATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JUNE 2, 1987
Mayor Reinke presiding
1] Roll Call at 7:00 P.M.
2] Recess for H.R.A. Meeting and for Board of Review
3] Convene as Housing and Redevelopment Authority
4] Convene as Board of Review
a] Chuck Mensing/Leroy Houser
b] Brown/Luse -
c] Clete Link
d] Ralph Nelson
e] Elsie Lebens
51 Adjourn Board of Review to . . .
6] Re -convene as City Council
7] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS
8] Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterick
are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be
enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of
these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event
the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered
in its normal sequence on the agenda.)
*9] Approval of the Minutes of May 5, 6, and 12, 1987
10] Communications: (Items noted for consent will be received and filed)
a] Gary Hartmann re: resignation from Shakopee Community Recreation Bd
b] Betty Sindt re: candidacy for directorship on the League of
Minnesota Cities Board
c] Jane Hansen, League of Women Voters of Shakopee re: video production
on governmental processes
d]
e]
ill Public Hearings:
121 Boards and Commissions:
Planning Commission:
a] Upper Valley Drainageway
b] 1988-1992 Capital Improvements
Energy and Transportation Committee:
*c] Expanding the Dial -A -Ride Hours of Operation
d] Community Energy Council Grant Application
13] Reports from Staff: [Counci
*a] Reimbursement Request
b] Re -naming of 13th Aver,
c] Utility Hook-ups for T
*d] Hiring Appraiser for 1
e] Prior Lake Spring Lake
*f] Market Street Appraisal
g] Endorsements for Vice P
h] Parkkeeper Injury
i] Termination of Probatio
*j] City of Shakopee Sergea
*k] Application for Taxicab
*11 Application for Tempora
*m] Application for Tempora
*n] Capital Equipment - Smo
*o] Malkerson Motors Use cf
*p] Surplus Property
TENTATIVE AGENDA
June 2, 1987
Page -2-
will take a 10 minute break around 9:001k
y Virgil Van Heel
Homes
Avenue Right -of -Way in E. Shakopee
:ershed District
of the League of Mn. Cities
- Receptionist/Typist
cense from Town Taxi tabled 5/19
3.2 Beer License by Sh per -Jaycees
3.2 Beer Lic hurch of St. Mark
Eject
q] Approve Bills ' Amount of $59,660.30
r] Vacati Austin Street 4o. of Davis Court
141 Resolutions and Ordinances:
tea] Res. No. 2734, Approving P1i
Ad for Bids for 13th Ave.
Project No. 1986-9
*b] Res. No. 2736., Accepting Bid
151 Other Business:
and Specifications and Ordering
m CR -89 to East Corporate Limits
City Parks Improvement No. 1987-8
a] Appoint Acting Administrator June 9-12 - City Administrator
attending League Conference
b] Setting Date for Picnic for Members of Boards & Commissions (7/27)
c]
d]
e]
161 Recess for Executive Session for a brief discussion on police sergeants
and public works negotiations
17] Re -convene
18] Adjourn to . . .
John K. Anderson
City Administrator
TENTATIVE AGENDA
,June 2, 1987
Page -2-
13] Reports from Staff: [Council will take a 10 minute break around 9:00]
*a] Reimbursement Request by Virgil Van Heel
b] Re -naming of 13th Avenue
c] Utility Hook-ups for Twin Homes
*d] Hiring Appraiser for 13th Avenue Right -of -Way in E. Shakopee
e] Prior Lake Spring Lake Watershed District
*f] Market Street Appraisals
g] Endorsements for Vice President of the League of Mn. Cities
h] Parkkeeper Injury
i] Termination of Probation - Receptionist/Typist
*j] City of Shakopee Sergeants
*k] Application for Taxicab License from Town Taxi tabled 5/19
*1] Application for Temporary 3.2 Beer License by Shakopee Jaycees
*m] Application for Temporary 3.2 Beer License by Church of St. Mark
*n] Capital Equipment - Smoke Ejectors
"o] Malkerson Motors Use cf City Property
*p] Surplus Property
q] Approve Bills in Amount of $59,660.30
r] Vacation of Austin Street So. of Davis Court
141 Resolutions and Ordinances:
tea] Res. No. 2734, Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering
Ad for Bids for 13th Ave. from CR -89 to East Corporate Limits
Project No. 1986-9
*b] Res. No. 2736., Accepting Bid on City Parks Improvement No. 1987-8
15] Other Business:
a] Appoint Acting Administrator June 9-12 - City Administrator
attending League Conference
b] Setting Date for Picnic for Members of Boards & Commissions (7/27)
c]
d]
e]
16] Recess for Executive Session for a brief discussion on police sergeants
and public works negotiations
171 Re -convene
18] Adjourn to . . .
John K. Anderson
City Administrator
TENTATIVE AGENDA
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting June 2, 1987
Chairperson Leroux presiding
1. Roll Call at 7:00 P.M.
2. Approval of Minutes of May 19, 1987
3. Other Business
4. Adjourn
Dennis R. Kraft
Executive Director
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SPECIAL FETING SRAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 19, 1987
Chairman Leroux called the meeting to order at 8:02 p.m. with Comm. Lebens,
Vierling. Wampach and Clay present. Also present were John K. Anderson,
City Administrator; Douglas Wise, City Planner; Kenneth Ashfeld, City
Engineer; Dennis Kraft, Executive Director; Judith Cox, City Clerk, and
Julius A. Coller II, City Attorney.
Vierling/Wampach moved to accept the special call. Motion carried unanimously.
Clay/Lebens moved to accept the minutes of May 5, 1987, Motion carried
unanimously.
The Executive Director reviewed the amendment to Escrow Agreement of
Series 1984 Tax Increment Refunding Bonds.
Vierling/Clay moved to adopt Resolution 87-2 amending the escrow agreement
for the series 1984 tax increment revenue refunding bonds.
Roll Call: Ayes: Comm. Vierling, Wampach, Leroux and Clay
Noes: Comm. Lebens
Motion carried.
Discussion ensued on lawn maintenance of the old prison site. It was
the consensus of the Council to have staff look into the possibility of
hiring the boy scouts to cut the lawn for a possible fund raiser for
them.
Vierling/Lebens moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting
adjourned at 8:12 p.m.
Dennis R. Kraft
Executive Director
Recording Secretary
DON D. MARTIN
SCOTT COUNTY ASSESSOR
COURT HOUSE 112
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612)-445-7750, Ext.115
Date: May 27, 1987
To: 1987 Shakopee Board of Review
From: Robert N. Schmitt, Scott County Assessor's Office
Subject: Assessor's Report on the 1987 Assessment
of the City of Shakopee
The 1987 assessment of Shakopee began in July of 1986 and was
completed in May of 1987. The work involved inspecting 360 new
structures and 96 partial completions from the 1986 assessment. Of
the 360 building permits issued, 49% were for residential
construction, 30% were for industrial and commercial properties,
and the remainder were for agricultural and exempt properties. Of
this total, 66 new homes were constructed in 1986.
The 25% reassessment involved the following plats: Part of the
original city of Shakopee, plats of Doyle & Pieper,
Wermerskirchen's, Marymark, Jasper & Smith, Hussman, Hennen's,
Notermann's, Hennen's 2nd, Geis 1st, Terrance, Jackson View, RLS
026, West View 1st & 2nd, Terrance Replat, Hauer's 1st & 3rd,
Montecito Heights, Riverview Estates, Prairie View 1st & 2nd,
Furrie's 1st, Century Plaza Square 3rd, South Parkview 1st,
Canterbury Park 2nd and Canterbury Apartments 1st.
During the reassessment, errors in measurements were discovered and
corrected.
yb
DON D. MARTIN
SCOTT COUNTY ASSESSOR
COURT HOUSE 112
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612)-445-7750, Ext.115
MEMORANDUM:
Date: May 29, 1987
To: 1987 Shakopee Board of Review
From: Robert N. Schmitt, Scott County Assessor's Office
Property Owner: grown/Luse Properties
Property Address 518 E. 2nd
Parcel 8: 27 001 841 0
1. Type & Description Of Property: This property has a
2 story building upon it which is used as a multifamily housing
complex. The building was constructed in about 1930 and updated
over the years. It has 5 apartments and does not have garages.
The building is 2 story with 1386 sq. ft. on the ground floor.
The basement is a partial.
2. Deck or Patio:
3. Garage Description:
4. Other:
5. Total Structural Value: §81,000. which includes the
value for extra kitchens and extra bathrooms.
6. Lot Size: 60 x 142
7. Lot Value: $20,000
B. Total Estimated Market Value of Property: $101,000
The property was purchased in April, 1981 for $97s000-
9. Other Information on Assessment: The property is class-
ified as below average due to the location which fronts the railroad
tracks on 2nd ave. The depreciation used is 30s which I believe is
more than adequate considering the maintenance of the property over
the years.
The concern of the owners appears to be related to the recent tax
legislation which reduces the allowances for ownership of this type
of property. (see letter).
We currently have a legal action filed for an apartment building in
Prior Lake which is addressing the ramifications of the tax laws. I
would recommend that any action on this issue should await the result
of this court decision since we have no sales which would indicate the
effects of the new tax laws.
DWELLING var buil) � ... • Lam' -
ua.v NNSbI _
m: baths
�. becf
buemem
Wren.m Im (in.
R.eplare
—M.
alld
>
2
air aoVal ar
b
ParAl
L. Sue
..a vn
OBSERVED CONDITION
BNd /
lair
SOLD
PMCEL NO. 4
1foK
DwELLwG year boon -
_x_an.n. -�
atop helaM
wma
At. INA—T
boaa.w., pe.<ml
bosom m r
walkout .alLoul
ded
mtnl a
b—k bim
porch
Int S re —
GARAGE _
anaddeA ret
OBSERVED CONDITION:
Lo
PARCEL NO.
�HNK
DATE SOLD
GRADE
•aoT33o 6uTuuPTd aadoXpgS
mos; omam gas :;uawssessy uo U014eWJO+Ul Jay#O '6
OOL'ZL$ :.(IJadOJd }o ante( ja„Jet.J po4vwj4s3 leiol '8
•43 •bs Jad SZ- zo OOL'Zl$ :ante( Sol 'L
S@aOv Ll't :aZIS 301 '9
:anje) jeJnj]nJ}S leiol 'S
2Ja4i0 'b
:uOI;dIJJsaa o6eJee '£
:Olied JO „Jaa 'z
•saJOP LL -L hia4PwTxosddP
3o PasP UP say qoj a4y •auoz L 8 P UT 1oL 4UPOPA P
sT d}Jadoid sT4l :.(;JadoJd }0 uolldlJosoa op odA.L 'T
L 8LO lL6 LZ :N taJJsd
•any pz£ •M :ssajppv .(iJado Jd
3[uiq •r sngaTD :Jaumo .(;JadoJd
a3l}}0 s,Jossassy .q uno0 ;;o3s 'Illw4DS •N 3Jagoa :WOJd
malnaa }o pJeoe eadoNe4S L861 :ol
L86T 16Z ATW :a;ea
: wnaNVNOW3W
SIT'ix3 'OSZZ-Sbb-(ZI9) 18EI-6L£99 NJ '33dONHHS
ZTi 3SOOH imnoo
HOSS3SSq k"00 1 -LOOS
N118dW '0 NDa
Ivo*
tis �
, eco a
' 00 ~ "
41(-11 to bi13N\ i i °❑
IM ayJ to curl Ito '� w d
j o ^"8
.� ❑O y L. 111
N
Aj o N' to ri a
`a e�rGi
w
Q
_Tbl
1n10 V! Q1 X4A. V.*
�:► m r � _"^i
ro 4, N O N.. (O g
0 Nto v) 0`-� o A. :i
t~+O1� h�� 4c. oemFeucT.
� ♦ n ., r '0 O ct L ar �.
r CD
'a a:
All:
6y C'e1�A'� Y.
�N :.1 �i:. �� A� m� m ii a o.-• b
.. nj' ..1',•.. epi 'i:'M1 V=:ETY.1
T •`
Al �
N+
�, --- "•\wv- NEV4of 1l -J13_23
300'.-;
sy
4r0a
Fin
:T
w
C9
`u r. -p b 1 n
b
• ��T 7:�?sLJi J•}
�
b •. n
0 CIAq `p
A
2
n i,a LL
:Ib y..4 W
y .r •y :1.
O 1 1 W
n n.
n
Oto , 4•.
O Ya�ro9 p'-�
y N
p yJx^' on
T H
V .l W O w U q U n
iun ••'r'� m'
�❑ Onn�.f mo`
.pi
04 - U
W �J v �
W
O 92n1� ,
t0 -t' ay n r
nn�Hr� r.
N P ••
1 n n,y fp
Hnp
W bfybJ�FT.
to -L yy,b°
y
O s,an>•u r
A.nwj
n �
Pn� Y 6
S
p n
0
u
T •`
Al �
N+
�, --- "•\wv- NEV4of 1l -J13_23
300'.-;
sy
4r0a
Fin
7�
MEMO TO:
John K.
Anderson,
City Administrator
FROM:
Douglas
K. Wise,
City Planner
RE:
Board of Review -
Cletus Link Property
DATE:
June 1,
1987
Introduction•
Mr. Link has apparently requested a devaluation of his
property on the basis that the parcel is not buildable.
Background•
In reviewing the survey of the property two issues arise:
(1) Access to public street right -o£ -ways and (2) Zoning of the
property.
1. Mr. Links property does abut Harrison Street. Whether the
frontage on Harrison is adequate to provide proper ingress
and egress to the property could not be determined from data
on file in City Hall. If this property does not have enough
frontage to allow a proper access Mr. Link would have to
negotiate a purchase or permanent easement from the parcel
immediately to the East.
2. Approximately the front half of this property is zoned R-4
and the rear half is zoned B-1. There is adequate space
within the R-4 zoned area of the lot to accommodate an
apartment building with 6-8 units. Mr. Link does have the
option of requesting rezoning which if approved would allow
the entire parcel to be zoned either B-1 or R-4. If rezoned
to R-4 the parcel could accommodate 16 apartment units, if
rezoned B-1, the parcel could accommodate a variety of
business opportunities.
staff Recommendation:
In terms of zoning the lot is clearly buildable. In terms
of access more information is necessary to make a clear
determination. -If Mr. Link came into City Hall and applied for a
building permit we would require Mr. Link to prove either
adequate frontage or provide a copy of a. permanent easement for
access. If he could provide either of those a building permit
could be issued.
qd
DON D. MARTIN
SCOTT COUNTY ASSESSOR
COURT HOUSE 112
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612)-445-7750, Ext.115
MEMORANDUM:
Date: May 29, 1987
To: 1987 Shakopee Board of Review
From: Robert N. Schmitt, Scott County Assessor's Office
Property Owner: Ralph & Bonnie Nelson
Property Address: 1006 S. Atwood
Parcel q: 27 012 085 0
1. Type & Description Of Property: This is a 1 story, singl(
family home. It was built in 1959 and has 1092 sq.ft.
The home has 1} baths, 208 of the basement is finished,
central air conditioning was installed in 1983, a 12 x 1,
3season porch was added in 1977, and there is a block
patio of 12 x 12 in the rear of the home. The basement
bath is not enclosed.
2. Deck or Patio: 12 x 12 block patio
3.
Garage
Description: 12 x 25 attached
4.
Other:
3 season porch
5.
Total
Structural Value: $49,300
6.
Lot Size:
70 x 148.8
7.
Lot Value:
$17,900
S.
Total
Estimated Market Value of
Property: $67,200
9.
Other
Information on Assessment:
This property was part
of the
1987 reassessment for 258
of Shakopee.
MELUNG Year bunt �R
Xp
sten beiRbl
m. bnhs
o. bedrooms 3
baxment eerxnt Inn ala
baxment Ion.
fnevlaa
.avant
od-L
noA t a.
o trim
p
perch _4—Seamw
lel 9x
GARAGE a7 .i
aBaAeE Yee �ro_�
OBSERVED CONDITlDN:
Leel
Geer
ROLPV VE��I.J
)fd
PMOL W. LL S:a_ n i a
StfdK.
n -az 60"-0
GRADE
DWELLING year beRl 61
_x_y. R. 10`1 a
NM M1eiYAI
ro. be1Fa 1 /a
no. IxAnm .3
Wxmenl w-.1 ^'1�
basement lin. D�4e
lirtPlue
—ik—1
d k
.1'br" t fir
nm
Pereh
LW Sim Y
GRAGE I a ."f .i
fnacbed fen -/
OBSERVED CONDITION!
i,'ALYH iJc_��,J
PARCEL NO.
Sdf�K.
n -az C o
GRADE
aSA1303a
-�'>"ra""�"'yam ��i-�"`�""�„•��-°�c���} >��d -
AO aE
- _W b-1-�G 7 T[s
,,
�' �`r
� � '
. .
,-.,, ,,,
. � ��
-'
%�
-, �
� �
i � � -,•
,, ,
�." ,., r
" ', i,
/y / �
' -�.' ^" :� �:� i- r �
/ � � " �"
� -
. . �, r �i,
-+ � / � i
i /�
� ,
��� � / //
� � it ice /
�- � �' , �
.� �. � � �
/J �
i �� �� l �. � �r � �
/ / / /
/ .
I r
� � � /
�/
— -�13dAa1tlHS dA A t10
(13A1333
�f j
ON DON D. MARTIN
SCOTT COUNTY ASSESSOR
COURT HOUSE 112
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612)-445-7750 , Ext . 115
MEMORANDUM:
Date : May 29, 1987
To: 1987 Shakopee Board of Review
From: Robert N. Schmitt , Scott County Assessor's Office
Property Owner : Clarence Lebens
Property Address: 548 E . 3rd Ave.
Parcel #: 27 001 829 0
1 . Type & Description Of Property: 1 story home of 807 squar
feet built in 1920. Partial basement of 50%. space heat,
asbetos shakes on esterior . The home has a living room,
kitchen, 1 bedroom, and 1 full bath.
2. Deck or Patio:
3. Garage Description : Detached 181 x 24 built in 1940 ' s.
4. Other:
5. Total Structural Value: $26 ,000
6. Lot Size: 70 x 142
7. Lot Value: 17 , 500
S. Total Estimated Market Value of Property: 43 , 500
9. Other Information on Assessment: New aluminum siding.
I�LPI=IJP Ej;Ev1S '
Dweuwc re+.boat 19 J v vnRCEb No.��
story belabl
ro, bales
no. bed'-
basement Remmt e`er
baument lin.
fw,el <e
.A...
dz Y
ta.
b.la
bim
Rm[b
Ea size
GAGE
.mama ree— /
OBSERVED CONDITION:
good
We � /y
�7-Av/rZt-D
D1I1 SVLD
CRIDF
L/
DWEWNO veae buil)
Y, Lc��c N� PMCEL NO.I—2—Cl I
_R_uR. N. eP07
ypY heigM1l
- bnhe
m. toed,—
baxmenl pe.anf _
baummt ft.
li.evlace r
--our
le
mtral a'
1
brick trim _
Irlh
Lot Sial p
GARAGE J.p_%
aMaahed Yef—ea y/
OBSERVED CONDITION:
Bmd
tair
S�•A7/l2?-0
DON D. MARTIN
SCOTT COL14TY ASSESSOR
COURT HOUSE 112
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1381 (612)-445-7750 , Ext . 115
MEMORANDUM:
Date : May 29, 1987
To: 1987 Shakopee Board of Review
From Robert N. Schmitt , Scott County Assessor's Office
Property Avner : Steven Benedict
Property Address: 404 E . 3rd Ave.
Parcel q: 27 001 384 0
1 . Type & Description Of Property: 1} story home of 912
square feet . Built in 1950 ' s with a full basement. The
home has aluminum siding which has been added in the past
few years . The structure has a living room, kitchen, full
bath, and 3 bedrooms .
2. Deck or Patio:
3. Garage Description : 20 x 22 built in 1970 with an
addition of 120 sq, feet added in 1974 . Detached.
4. Other :
5. Total Structural Value : 47 , 500
6. Lot Size : 7320 sq. ft. irregular shape .
7. Lot Value : 13 , 500
8. Total Estimated Market Value of Property: 61 ,000
9. Other Information on Assessment : Purchased in 1983 for
47 , 500 . Value in 1986 was $50 , 500 .
ST
��E SNF--Dry +�p�y
DWELLING Year but `J O E PARCEL NO.S6Li
slog beiehl �2
m. babes _ .•� .
m. bedrooms __ _
basemem Re. -
base enl He.
Ii'maae
.alLom
e«L
n ral air
aia Irim
Rarcb
Lal Si-
GARAGE a7 aa.
aMacbN Yea m
OBSERVED CONDITION:
Bond
�
r 97-
LATE SOLD
GRADE
�O�
STF-VE l7 ENESICT .` }�i.f' �
DweulNc r.+. e.Rl I'"So_ PARCEL No.
_X_w. B. `IIS SHr�K
story ha"hl 1 �2
ro. W ir,
u. bedm.ma
baume.' pace.'
bau ea lm
lireplatt
vahoot
dao
m".I air
b.ih trim
Porth
La' 5
i
-
GARAGE 1 X as
attaceed rea--
OBSERVED CONDITION:
good
fair
poo.
97-OOf3�y-O
DATE SOLD
GRADE
y14
Mr DON D. MARTIN
SCOTT COUNTY ASSESSOR
COURT HOUSE 112
SHAKOPEE, MTI 55379-1381 (612)-445-7750 . Ext . 115
MEMORANDUM:
Date : May 29, 1987
To: 1987 Shakopee Board of Review
From: Robert N. Schmitt , Scott County Assessor's Office
Property Owner :8700 Partners
Property Address: 8700 E. Hwy. 101
Parcel #: 27 086 002 0
1 . Type & Description Of Property: Commercial property with
office and warehouse space. Built in 1980. The proeprty has
4811 square feet of office space and 69 , 589 square feet of
warehouse area. The structure is constructed of concrete
block, 20' height, flat roof with tar s gravel . New office
area added in 1986 to accomodate White Farms.
2. Deck or Patio:
3. Garage Description:
4. Other : central air conditioning , 201 ,400 sq. ft. of
paved area.
5. Total Structural Value: 912, 500
6. Lot Size : 9 . 1229 acres
7. Lot Value : 100, 000
S. Total Estimated Market Value of Property: 1 ,012 , 500
9. Other Information on Assessment : Purchased in 1986 for
1, 300,000.
�i�.. }! I
I. !ro
LNELLI%G rear buil'
Zn
GN>GE
Y �
JJ
��ce��tair�
Family Amusement PaRk
One Valleyfair Drive,Shakopee,MN 55379
(612)445-7600
June 1, 1987
To Robert Schmitt, Scott County Property Appraiser and the Shakopee Board
of Review:
Valleyfair is questioning three points in its 1/2/87 real estate
property tax valuation:
1) Valuation of amphitheatre seating improvements.
2) Valuation of raft ride improvements.
3) Classification of a major portion of the raft ride as real property.
Robert Schmitt and I will meet to resolve the first two points. The
County Attorney's Office and Valleyfair legal counsel are researching the
third item.
Sincerely,
Alan L. Schwartz/
Vice President of Finance
ALS:dw
All �� /9cP •�
�SSESSoi2 Ssil�i11.t0 �s/�s�•GY (/.9LciE a�
Gi�G<st.�ro.ti �yit=i �izsr�oc..fo //fid /Ax
�,C�Frs�rJO
lr G�J7,r�oG�
�QUnq -4 �lZFlc��
��O000
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 5, 1987
Mayor Reinke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.. with Cncl.
Leroux, Vierling, Lebens, Clay and Wampach present. Also present
were John K. Anderson, City Administrator; Dennis Kraft,
Community Development Director; Douglas Wise, City Planner;
Kenneth Ashfeld, City Engineer; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; and
Julius A. Coller II, City Attorney.
Wampach/Lebens moved to recess for HRA. Motion carried
unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling moved to reconvene at 7:04 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
Liaison reports were given by Councilmembers.
Mayor Reinke asked if there was anyone who wished to address
anything not on the agenda. There was no response.
Leroux/Vierling moved to approve the consent business.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Leroux/Vierling moved to approve the minutes of April 21, 1987.
(Approved under consent business. )
Leroux/Clay moved to approve the minutes of April 28, 1987.
Motion carried with Cncl. Lebens abstaining.
Leroux/Vierling moved to receive and place on file the letter
from George Muenchow, Director of Shakopee Community Recreation
regarding flag pole donation. (Approved under consent business. )
Discussion ensued on Suburban Rate Authority-Metropolitan Area
Telephone Rate Design. The City Administrator said the SRA is
asking its members to express their opinions on the issue of
whether or not the present metropolitan calling area should be
expanded to include Zimmerman, Prescott, Waconia, Belle Plaine,
North Branch, Lindstrom, New Prague, Cambridge, Hudson and
Houlton.
Leroux/Vierling moved to receive and place on file the letter
regarding Suburban Rate Authority-Metropolitan Area Telephone
Rate Design. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Leroux moved to direct staff to contact the legislators
about the impact of cuts and reductions on city finances and
services and also express concerns about adequate funding for
transit and transportation proposes. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council
May 5, 1987
Page -2-
Leroux/Wampach moved to have staff bring back a report on the
City' s possible participation in Planning for the Region' s Future
for the Metropolitan Council. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Wampach moved to receive and place on file the Action
Alert from Stan G. Peskar regarding Pre 73 Retirees Assessment.
Motion carried unanimously.
r'
Leroux/Lebens moved to open the public hearing on Appeal of Board
of Adjustments and Appeals Denial for a variance from the Sign
Ordinance for Valleyfair. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Planner said Valleyfair is r questing a variance from
the City Sign Ordinance to allow them to construct an entrance
sign 412. 5 sq. ft. in size. The curre t ordinance allows maximum
size of 100 sq. ft. in a I-2 zone. a Board of Adjustments and
Appeals moved to deny th request £or a variance due to there not
being sufficient hardshi shown. Cn 1. Clay addressed a safety
issue involved in this riance r quest being that it is a sign
marking the entrance off o a stat highway and to be able to see
where the entrance sign is o that there would be sufficient time
to safely exit the highway. Cn 1 Vierling asked if there was
anything that could be done o allow the message panel on the
sign. It was Mayor Reinke's cern that a precedent might be
shown by allowing this vari ce request. Walt Witmer, Vice
President/General Manager of V 11\the
isplayed a drawing of
the sign proposed and review d she features o£ the sign.
This particular sign has a tol quare feet. He said it
is important to get thissigsoon as possible before
August as that is the bulk f hiess. Cncl. Leroux said
that neon moving signs are not and Walt Witmer said that
the sign will not move.
Wampach/Clay moved to clos the pea ing. Motion carried
unanimously.
Leroux/Wampach moved to a prove VResold ion No. 484 based
upon the fact that it will aid ining the hardship caused
by the City of Shakopee in condemnation of their previous sign.
Motion carried unanimously.
Becky Kelso, State Representative, was present and discussion
ensued on the ticket tax proposed by Scott County. Mayor Reinke
said that the City has discussed their feelings .with the County
Board in respect to statements, comments and press releases and
the general sentiment of what the pulse of the community feels.
City Council
May 5, 1987
Page -2-
Leroux/Wampach moved to have staff bring back a report on the
City' s possible participation in Planning for the Region' s Future
for the Metropolitan Council. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Wampach moved to receive and place on file the Action
Alert from Stan G. Peskar regarding Pre 73 Retirees Assessment.
Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux/Lebens moved to open the public hearing on Appeal of Board
of Adjustments and Appeals Denial for a Variance from the Sign
Ordinance for Valleyfair. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Planner said Valleyfair is requesting a variance from
the City Sign Ordinance to allow them to construct an entrance
sign 412. 5 sq. ft. in size. The current ordinance allows maximum
size of 100 sq. ft. in an I-2 zone. The Board of Adjustments and
Appeals moved to deny the request for a variance due to there not
being sufficient hardship shown. Cncl. Clay addressed a safety
issue involved in this variance request being that it is a sign
marking the entrance off of a state highway and to be able to see
where the entrance sign is so that there would be sufficient time
to safely exit the highway. Cncl Vierling asked if there was
anything that could be done to allow the message panel on the
sign. It was Mayor Reinke 's concern that a precedent might be
shown by allowing this variance request. Walt Witmer, Vice
President/General Manager of Valleyfair displayed a drawing of
the sign proposed and reviewed some of the features of the sign.
This particular sign has a total of 402 square feet. He said it
is important to get this sign up as soon as possible before
August as that is the bulk of his business. Cncl. Leroux said
that neon moving signs are not allowed and Walt Witmer said that
the sign will not move.
Wampach/Clay moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried
unanimously.
Leroux/Wampach moved to approve Variance Resolution No. 484 based
upon the fact that it will aid in eliviating the hardship caused
by the City of Shakopee in condemnation of their previous sign.
Motion carried unanimously.
Becky Kelso, State Representative, was present and discussion
ensued on the ticket tax proposed by Scott County. Mayor Reinke
said that the City has discussed their feelings with the County
Board in respect to statements, comments and press releases and
the general sentiment of what the pulse of the community feels.
i
I
City Council
May 5, 1987
Page -3-
The County has asked that the City not speak against the tax at
the legislature on May 7. Discussion on this item will occur
later on the agenda. Ms. Kelso said she is not asking the City
to change their opinion, but said she is concerned about the
federal funding for the Bloomington Ferry Bridge if the county
does not come up with the matching funds. Cncl. Vierling said
, she is not opposed to the tax and feels that it would help the
City as well, and she feels that the City has an obligation to
see that property taxes do not go any higher.
Leroux/Vierling moved to open the public hearing on Appeal of
Board of Adjustments and Appeal Denial of a Variance from the
Sign Ordinance for the Backstretch RV Park - South of RR racks
and East of CR-89. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Planner reviewed the request for a Variance to the sign
ordinance from Backstretch RV Park. They have requested a
variance to allow one free standing sign to be at a height of 30
feet and to allow two signs, one at Highway 101 and one at the
entrance on 13th Avenue. Diane Klausner, representing
Backstretch RV Park said the sign on the highway will have a
vacancy-no vacancy sign on it which they feel will be very
helpful to motorists so they will not have to pull off the road
to see if there is a vacancy.
Debra VanHale lives on 13th Avenue near to this park and is very
much opposed to this because small kids are riding their bikes
along the road and RVs will be making wide turns at the short
stretch of 101.
Jack VanRemortel explained that he is trying to direct people to
the signed intersection with the 30 ' sign, not just having a sign
sticking up in the air.
Wampach/Vierling moved to close the public hearing. Motion
carried unanimously.
Leroux/Wampach offered Resolution No. CC-481, with the staff
recommendations thatthetwo signs be allowed, that there be
variance not to exceed 20 feet for the sign near Highway 101 and
that the maximum signage area be increased to only 111 square
feet. Cncl. Leroux asked if the applicant could check into the
possibility of adding another part to the sign that would read
"next left" or some equivalent to that.
Vierling/Lebens moved to amend the motion to have a 5 year
review, as it relates to the elevation of the highways, only.
Motion carried unanimously.
City Council
May 5, 1967
Page -4-
Main motion carried unanimously as am Ided.
Leroux/Vierling moved for a 10 minute recess. Motion carried
unanimously
Clay/Wam ch moved to reconvene 9: 25 p.m. Motion carried
unanimou ly.
Leroux/W ach moved to open he public hearing on vacation of
certain ea ements and right-of+way within Hauer' s 3rd Addition -
North of pr osed 13th Avenue. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Cler said that this hearing is a result of the final
plat of Hauer 4th Addition. One of the conditions was that
certain easemen and right-o£-way in the 3rd Addition would be
vacated in order o facilitate the final plat of Hauer's 4th. It
is recommended th t the Council delay adopting the resolution of
vacation, until t final plat of Hauer' s 4th Addition is ready
to be recorded, be ause it becomes effective immediately after
adoption.
Disc
n ensued on the building permit application
of Stan Pint for a lot in Hauer's 3rd Addition. Mr. Pint's
setback requirements -are affected by the vacation of 13th Avenue
in Hauer' s 3rd AdditipA, and dedication of Onyx Drive in Hauer' s
4th Addition. Thy etback requirements are less after the
vacation. The b,F7,/'ldi g permit cannot be issued until the
vacation, without s ecial authorization from the Council.
Mr. Dale Dahlke, Developer of Hauer' s 4th Addition, asked Council
if they could adopt the vacating resolution but make it
conditional upon filing of t e plat.
Mayor Reinke asked if there re any comments from the audience,
and there were none.
Leroux/Vierling moved to clos the public hearing. Motion
carried unanimously. .
Leroux/Vierlingjoffered Resoluti n No. 2720, A Resolution
Vacating Certain Easements and Ri t-Of-Way Within the Plat of
Hauer's 3rd Addition as Herein Desc 'bed, and moved its adoption
as amended to be effective within 60 ays or filing of the plat
for Hauer' s 4th Addition whichever comes first. Motion carried
unanimously.
Vierling/Clay moved to authorize city sta f to issue a building
permit requiring the applicant to sign a waiver indicating he
will conform to all city codes should the s rest vacation or the
plat not be filed. Motion carried unanimous Y.
City Council
May 5, 1987
Page -4-
Main motion carried unanimously as amended.
Leroux/Vierling moved for a 10 minute recess. Motion carried
unanimously.
Clay/Wampach moved to reconvene at 9:25 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
Leroux/Wampach moved to open the public hearing on vacation of
certain easements and right-o£-way within Hauer' s 3rd Addition -
North of proposed 13th Avenue. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Clerk said that this hearing is a result of the final
plat of Hauer' s 4th Addition. One of the conditions was that
certain easements and right-of-way in the 3rd Addition would be
vacated in order to facilitate the final plat of Hauer's 4th. It
is recommended that the Council delay adopting the resolution of
vacation, until the final plat of Hauer's 4th Addition is ready
to be recorded, because it becomes effective immediately after
adoption. Discussion ensued on the building permit application
of Stan Pint for a lot in Hauer's 3rd Addition. Mr. Pint's
setback requirements are affected by the vacation of 13th Avenue
in Hauer' s 3rd Addition and dedication of Onyx Drive in Hauer's
4th Addition. The setback requirements are less after the
vacation. The building permit cannot be issued until the
vacation, without special authorization from the Council.
Mr. Dale Dahlke, Developer of Hauer' s 4th Addition, asked Council
if they could adopt the vacating resolution but make it
conditional upon filing of the plat.
Mayor Reinke asked if there were any comments from the audience,
and there were none.
Leroux/Vierling moved to close the public hearing. Motion
carried unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2720, A Resolution
Vacating Certain Easements and Right-Of-Way Within the Plat of
Hauer's 3rd Addition as Herein Described, and moved its adoption
as amended to be effective within 60 days or filing of the plat
for Hauer' s 4th Addition whichever comes first. Motion carried
unanimously.
Vierling/Clay moved to authorize city staff to issue a building
permit requiring the applicant to sign a waiver indicating he
will conform to all city codes should the street vacation or the
plat not be filed. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council
May 5, 1987
Page -5-
Lebens/Vierling moved to open the public hearing on vacation of
Austin Street South of Davis Court. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Clerk said this request was from Mr. Jim Hauer who owns
an abutting lot in the area. The cost for restoring the street
could be born by the applicant or by the City. Cncl. Leroux said
in order for Austin street to continue to the South it would need
a bridge. Discussion ensued on vacating the street and
maintaining the easements. Al DuBois, an adjoining property
owner, said he does not benefit one way or the other from
vacating this street, he is happy the way it is, and does not
feel that he should share in the cost of vacation and
restoration.
Lebens/Vierling moved to close the public hearing. Motion
carried unanimously.
Leroux/Wampach moved to direct staff to meet with Mr. Dubois and
Mr. Jim Hauer to come up with an agreement for absorbing the
expenses of vacating Austin Street south of Davis Court. Motion
carried unanimously.
Clay/Vierling moved to approve the application and grant a Set-Up
License and On-sale license for Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor to
Damile, Inc. at 2400 E. 4th Avenue beginning May 6, 1987. Motion
carried unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling moved that the collection of the VIP lateral
assessments from the two lots previously owned by Mr. John Nelson
be abated in the amount of $6,379. 31 to properties assessed a
lateral charge on the VIP project.
Roll Call: Ayes: Cncl. Vierling, Leroux, Clay, Mayor
Reinke
Noes: Cncl. Lebens, Wampach
Motion carried.
Discussion ensued on adding the additional position of City
Planner. The future workload of the Planning Staff may warrant
the hiring of an additional staff person. The City Planner said
that the Planning Commission has recommended the hiring of
another Planner which has been budgeted for.
Cncl. Lebens said that it was her feeling that a lot of the
workload could be just as readily handled by consultants instead
of a staff person. Discussion on consultant versus staff person
ensued. Cncl. Vierling said she felt that with a consultant
continuity would be lost and it would cost more than hiring a
staff person.
City Council
May 5, 1987
Page -6-
Vierling/Clay moved to authorize filling the Planner I position
as budgeted in 1987.
Roll Call: Ayes : Cncl. Vierling, Clay, Mayor Reinke
Noes: Cncl. Wampach� Lebens, and Leroux
Motion fails.
Leroux/Vierling moved to have staf investigate the possibility
of putting together a package hat would include hiring two
summer interns and consultants as ecessary. Motion carried with
Cncl. Wampach and Lebens opposed.
Cncl. Vierling said she would ke to review the package after a
period of one year to see how t e cost compares with the hiring
of a full time person.
Leroux/Lebens moved \to direc staff to begin a review and study
of the City' s codes r�aardin septic systems. Motion carried
unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling moved have the hours for calendar parking
changed in the ordinance be in effect from 2 AM until 6 AM,
which would also acco ate some business and educational
institutions, such as the to al schools, churches, etc. . These
hours would also be in 'ne ith the parking restrictions in the
downtown area, which sho ld a so remain from 2 AM until 6 AM.
Motion carried unanimous y.
Leroux/Vierling moved o authori a staff to purchase a 1985 AMC
Eagle from Bob' s Transf r at a cos of $4,500. (Approved under
consent business)
Discussion ensued n Killarney Hills and Market Street
Feasibility Reports r the public h aring to be held May 12,
1987.
Leroux/Vierling off red Resolution No 2725, A Resolution
Accepting Bid on Int rsection Improvements to Trunk Highway 101
and County Road 83, Project 1987-1 and moved its adoption.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Clay/Leroux moved to authorize the appropriate City Officials to
execute a consultant services agreement with Barton-Aschman
Associates for an amount not to exceed $6, 055.00.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Vierling/Clay offered Resolution No. 2726 which authorizes the
appropriate City Officials to execute the signal agreement with
the. Minnesota Department of Transportation for the signalization _
City Council
May 5, 1987
Page -6-
Vierling/Clay moved to authorize filling the Planner I position
as budgeted in 1987.
Roll Call: Ayes: Cncl. Vierling, Clay, Mayor Reinke
Noes: Cncl. Wampach, Lebens, and Leroux
Motion fails.
Leroux/Vierling moved to have staff investigate the possibility
of putting together a package that would include hiring two
summer interns and consultants as necessary. Motion carried with
Cncl. Wampach and Lebens opposed.
Cncl. Vierling said she would like to review the package after a
period of one year to see how the cost compares with the hiring
of a full time person.
Leroux/Lebens moved to direct staff to begin a review and study
of the City' s codes regarding septic systems. Motion carried
unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling moved to have the hours for calendar parking
changed in the ordinance to be in effect from 2 AM until 6 AM,
which would also accommodate some business and educational
institutions, such as the local schools, churches, etc. . These
hours would also be in line with the parking restrictions in the
downtown area, which should also remain from 2 AM until 6 AM.
Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling moved to authorize staff to purchase a 1985 AMC
Eagle from Bob's Transfer at a cost of $4,500. (Approved under
consent business)
Discussion ensued on Killarney Hills and Market Street I,
Feasibility Reports for the public hearing to be held May 12,
1987.
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2725, A Resolution
Accepting Bid on Intersection Improvements to Trunk Highway 101
and County Road 83, Project 1987-1 and moved its adoption.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Clay/Leroux moved to authorize the appropriate City Officials to
execute a consultant services agreement with Barton-Aschman j
Associates for an amount not to exceed $6, 055. 00.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried. j
Vierling/Clay offered Resolution No. 2726 which authorizes the
appropriate City Officials to execute the signal agreement with
the. Minnesota Department of Transportation for the signalization _
City Council
May 5, 1987
Page -7-
of the intersection of Trunk Highway 101 and County Road 83, and
moved its adoption.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Leroux/Lebens moved to approve the bills in the amount of
$64,291.62.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried. j
Vierling/Clay moved to direct City' s property acquisition
committee and the City Engineer to communicate to Mr. Jack
Brambilla the City' s intentions concerning right-of-way
acquisition for the mini-bypass project, proposed time schedules
for acquisition and develop proposals for acquisition. Motion
carried unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling moved to authorize preliminary survey work to
align the Husman Addition and the replat of Notermann Addition
and provide center line control points by the City' s consultant,
Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates at a cost not to exceed
$1, 400.00 to be paid out of the Sewer Fund. (Sixth Avenue
Sanitary Sewer Reconstruction) (Approved under consent business)
Leroux/Vierling moved to authorize plans and specifications for
reconstruction of the 6th Avenue Sanitary Sewer from Monroe
Street to Adams Street and Adams Street from 6th Avenue to 5th
Avenue. (Approved under consent business)
Leroux/Vierling moved to approve addendum and authorize
appropriate City officials to execute the addendum dated May 5,
1987 to the agreement between the Chamber of Commerce and the
City dated November 4, 1986 regarding the construction and
ownership of the Visitors Information Center/Convention Bureau
facility. (Approved under consent business)
Leroux/Vierling moved to authorize the appropriate City officials
to enter into the Reciprocal Fire Service Agreement with the City
of Eden Prairie dated May 5, 1987. (Approved under consent
business)
Leroux/Vierling moved to approve the transfer of $19,529.37 from
the 1972 Improvement Fund to the 1986A-81 Refunding Fund,
$246, 040.90 from the 1981 Improvement Fund to the 1986A-81 Fund
and to move deferred assessments in the amount of $363, 974. 86 and
developers deposits in the amount of $18, 172. 88 from the 1981
Fund to the 1986A-81 Fund. (Approved under consent business)
Leroux/Vierling moved to authorize the proper City officials to- - — _- -
execute a revised Fire Service Agreement with the Township. of. _.-
Jackson. (Approved under consent business)
City Council
May 5, 1987
Page -8-
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2724, A Resolution
Amending Resolution No. 2665 Adopting the 1987 Pay Plan, and
moved its adoption. (Approved under consent business)
Leroux/Vierling moved to remove Ordinance No. 214 (Regulating
Horse and Livery Service) from the table. Motion carried
unanimously.
Leroux/Wampach offered Ordinance No. 214, Ordinance of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending Shakopee City Code, Chapter
6 entitled "Other Business Regulations and Licensing" by Adding
Section 6.22B thereto entitled "Horse and Carriage Livery
Service" and Adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code Chapter 1
and Section 6. 99, which among others things contain penalty
provisions, and moved its adoption. Motioncarried unanimously.- --
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2714, A Resolution
Authorizing the Execution of An Agreement Between the City of
Shakopee and State for Federal Aid Highway Improvement and moved
its adoption. (Approved under consent business)
Vierling/Wampach offered Resolution No. 2718, A Resolution
Accepting Work on 2nd Avenue Parking Lot Reconstruction and Storm
Sewer, Project No. 1985-4 and moved its adoption.
Roll Call: Ayes: Cncl. Leroux, Vierling, Clay, Wampach,
and Mayor Reinke
Noes: Cnc1. Lebens
Motion carried.
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolut'on No. 2721, A Resolution of
Disclaimer, and moved its ad ption. (Approved under consent
business)
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolut'on No. 2723, A Resolution
Requesting the State of Minnesot to Participate Financially in
the Upper Valley Basin Drainage Pro 'ect, and moved its adoption. -
(Approved under Consent business)c
I
Discussion ensued on the 25 ent a ' ssions tax proposed by the
County on major amusement facilities. t was the consensus that
the City bring up the possibility of adding a sunset clause after
10 years to the County. Walt Witmer said he attended the meeting
with the County and it does not appear that they listen to what
the City is proposing. Consensus was that the City is not
against the tax but there is a concern as to where the money will
be spent. The City Administrator suggested two amendments to be
brought up to the County for consideration: 1) All the money
will go for the County' s match for the bridge and 2) Sunset
clause in 10 years.
City Council
May 5, 1987
Page -8-
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2724, A Resolution
Amending Resolution No. 2665 Adopting the 1987 Pay Plan, and
moved its adoption. (Approved under consent business)
Leroux/Vierling moved to remove Ordinance No. 214 (Regulating
Horse and Livery Service) from the table. Motion carried
unanimously.
Leroux/Wampach offered Ordinance No. 214, An Ordinance of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending Shakopee City Code, Chapter
6 entitled "Other Business Regulations and Licensing" by Adding
Section 6. 22B thereto entitled "Horse and Carriage Livery
Service" and Adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code Chapter 1
and Section 6. 99, which among other things contain penalty
provisions, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2714, A Resolution
Authorizing the Execution of An Agreement Between the City of
Shakopee and State for Federal Aid Highway Improvement and moved
its adoption. (Approved under consent business)
Vierling/Wampach offered Resolution No. 2718, A Resolution
Accepting Work on 2nd Avenue Parking Lot Reconstruction and Storm
Sewer, Project No. 1985-4 and moved its adoption.
Roll Call: Ayes: Cncl. Leroux, Vierling, Clay, Wampach,
and Mayor Reinke
Noes: Cncl. Lebens
Motion carried.
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2721, A Resolution of
Disclaimer, and moved its adoption. (Approved under consent
business)
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2723, A Resolution
Requesting the State of Minnesota to Participate Financially in
the Upper Valley Basin Drainage Project, and moved its adoption. - -
(Approved under consent business)
Discussion ensued on the 25 cent admissions tax proposed by the
County on major amusement facilities. It was the consensus that
the City bring up the possibility of adding a sunset clause after
10 years to the County. Walt Witmer said he attended the meeting
with the County and it does not appear that they listen to what
the City is proposing. Consensus was that the City is not
against the tax but there is a concern as to where the money will
be spent. The City Administrator suggested two amendments to be
brought up to the County for consideration: 1) All the money
will go for the County' s match for the bridge and 2) Sunset
clause in 10 years.
City Council
May 5, 1987
Page -9-
The City would try and meet with the County on Wednesday night,
May 6, 1987, to discuss this proposal further.
Leroux/Vierling moved to direct the City Administrator to contact
the County on May 6, 1987, stating our agreement with the 25 cent
tax if the County agrees to the four clauses to agree between the
County and the City and that they will agree to a sunset clause
to be amended to the legislation for a period of not longer than
10 years and that we be advised as soon as possible as to their
reaction. (CC-Doc. No. 137) Motion carried with Cncl. Wampach
and Clay opposed.
Leroux/Vierling moved to adjourn to Wednesday, May 6, 1987, at
7: 00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at
11 : 55 p.m.
Judith S. Cox
City Clerk
i
Carol L. Schultz
Recording Secretary
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 6, 1987
Mayor Reinke called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. with Cncl.
Leroux, Lebens, Clay and .Wampach present. Cncl. Vierling arrived
at 7:40 p.m. Also present were John K. Anderson, City
Administrator; Brandt Richardson, Assistant County Administrator;
Tim Keane, Fred Corrigan and Walt Wittmer.
Discussion ensued on proposed legislation regarding a $.25
admission tax to Valleyfair, Canterbury Downs and the Renaissance
Festival.
Scott County Board of Commissioners have approved the following
language as a concept on which to base a Memorandum of
Understanding with the City:
1. Funds raised by the proposed admissions tax on major
amusement facilities within the City of Shakopee shall be
spent on county roads and bridges on routes which directly
or indirectly carry traffic to and from the major amusement
facilities in northern Scott County, further defined as
those projects listed on Attachment A.
2. The first priority for use of the admissions tax revenue
shall be to match funds from Hennepin County and/or the
State of Minnesota for design, engineering, and construction
of the Bloomington Ferry Bridge and related interchanges and
approach work in Scott County.
3. The County shall continue to fund its five year Road and
Bridge Improvement Program based upon county road
improvements required throughout the county.
The intent of this provision is that the allocation of
projects in the five-year program shall not be adversely
affected by the raising of funds through an admission tax,
but nothing in this provision shall limit the acceleration
or deceleration of the five-year program on a county-wide
basis by the Board of Commissioners.
4. The county shall advocate a twenty-year "sunset" for the
tax, which is intended to be of a duration to guarantee
revenue for the lifetime of bonds of this maturity.
5. The City of Shakopee shall advocate and testify in support
of H.F. 1219 (Admission Tax Legislation) , in all legislative
hearings on and after May 7, 1987.
Leroux/Vierling moved to concur with the concept of the Scott
County Board on a Memorandum of Understanding with the City
regarding the proposed $.25 admission tax with two amendments:
a) item no. 4 changed to a 15 year sunset; and b) item no. 5
City Council
May 6, 1987
Page -2-
changed to "The City4journto
kopee sh 1 affirm its support of H.F.
1219 (Admission Tax tion) " .
Wampach/Lerou movedess at 8:01 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
Leroux/Wampach mo dconve a at 8: 04 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
Roll Call: Ayes: Cierl'ng, Leroux and Mayor Reinke
Noes: Cmp ch, Lebens and Clay
Motion fails
After failure of the ouncilmembers concurred that their
previous position tohe ill laid over would stand.
Leroux/Lebens movedjourn to Tuesday, May 12, 1987 at 7:00
p.m. Motion carriedously Meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
John K. Anderson
cording Secretary
Judith Cox
City Clerk
City Council
May 6, 1987
Page -2-
changed to "The City of Shakopee shall affirm its support of H.F.
1219 (Admission Tax Legislation) ".
Wampach/Leroux moved to recess at 8:01 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
Leroux/Wampach moved to reconvene at 8: 04 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
Roll Call: Ayes: Cncl. Vierling, Leroux and Mayor Reinke
Noes: Cncl. Wampach, Lebens and Clay
Motion fails
After failure of the motion, councilmembers concurred that their
previous position to have the bill laid over would stand.
Leroux/Lebens moved to adjourn to Tuesday, May 12, 1987 at 7:00
p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
John K. Anderson
Recording Secretary
Judith S. Cox
City Clerk
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ADJ.REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MAY 12, 1987
Mayor Reinke called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. with Cncl.
Leroux, Lebens, Clay, and Wampach present. Cncl. vierling was
absent. Also present were John K. Anderson, City Administrator;
Kenneth Ashfeld, City Engineer; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; and
Julius A. Coller II, City Attorney.
Leroux/Lebens moved to open the public hearing on the proposed
improvements to roadways within Killarney Hills by street
construction. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Engineer explained that the proposed improvement would
be a typical urban street construction including bituminous
surfacing, curb, and gutter; and would include the removal of the
in-place bituminous surfacing. The estimated cost of the
improvements are $171,948. The method used for calculating the
special assessments is the adjusted front foot method, which
measures the width of the lot 150 feet back from the right-of-
way. There would be assessments to the City park land, as well
as the two lots which the City purchased through the Metropolitan
Council loan program.
Roger Sames asked what is the projection date when sewer and
water would be extended to the area. The City Engineer responded
that this area will not be within the Metropolitan Urban Service
Area, for sanitary sewer, according to the Metropolitan Council
Investment Framework, before the year 2000. Water is as close as
Canterbury Park 2nd Addition and probably would not be extended
to the area for another two to four years.
Jerry Feltmann asked if the City has received any flack for the
construction of curb and gutter. The City Engineer responded
that this is the first hearing on the proposed improvement and
this is the time for property owners to provide testimony. He
also explained that there are some homes abutting unimproved
streets. The City is looking at extensive upkeep or the
construction of these roads. He explained that when sewer and
water are extended to the area they will not intrude on the
roadway with the exception of one lot.
Mayor Reinke raised the issue of putting in the water now. The
City Engineer responded that the City could take a look at
extending water at this time if that is the desire of the City
and of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
Ross Clay asked when the City would be surfacing the area. The
City Engineer responded that the City could construct the
improvement this year if it is ordered, however, if water is
desired it may take longer. Mr. Clay believes that the City
should wait until the By-pass is constructed.
ee Cit Council
Shakopee y
Page Two
May 12, 1987
Roger Sames asked if anything is planned for the outlets lying
south of this subdivision. The City Engineer responded that the
City has received no development plans from the property owner at
this time.
Mrs. Feltmann asked why it was necessary o construct curb with
so few residents in the area. The City Engineer responded that
if there was no curb it would be nec as
to install a more
costly erosion protection which would c into the lots more.
Roger Sames exp ined that the park i to benefit the whole area
including the out ts. He would like to see the sewer and water
installed along 'th the street. He also explained that the
residents would be p ying for roads hich would also benefit the
outlets which will be developed la r.
Paul Schmitz stated at he ould like to see the roadway
construction delayed unti after he Hy-pass is constructed. He
also explained that he h s bee a resident in the area for 19
years and has had no proble wi his water or septic tank.
Eldon Greenwood asked if any reet lights would be installed or
if any street signs would b installed: "dead end", and "watch
for children" . The City Eng ne r responded that the residents
could petition for street ght whether or not the street is
constructed.
Mr. Greenwood asked if ther were o er alternatives to putting
in the road. The City ngineer re onded that the City could
continue maintaining th road where there is some street
construction and where th area is unimp ved it may be difficult
to maintain the area fas enough.
Cool. Leroux stated th t he does not like to see the cost of
excess maintanence bor a by the rest of the Ci for bad streets;
however, he believe that this area is not ready for
improvements; he would also like to see the sewer and water
constructed to this area.
Mayor Reinke asked if there were any additional comments. There
were none.
Lebens/Leroux moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried
unanimously.
Wampach/Clay moved to put the Killarney Hills improvements on the
Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for a future date. Motion
carried unanimously.
Shakopee City Council
Page Two
May 12, 1987
Roger Sames asked if anything is planned for the outlots lying
south of this subdivision. The City Engineer responded that the
City has received no development plans from the property owner at
this time.
Mrs. Feltmann asked why it was necessary to construct curb with
so few residents in the area. The City Engineer responded that
if there was no curb it would be necessary to install a more
costly erosion protection which would cut into the lots more.
Roger Sames explained that the park is to benefit the whole area
including the outlots. He would like to see the sewer and water
installed along with the street. He also explained that the
residents would be paying for roads which would also benefit the
outlots which will be developed later.
Paul Schmitz stated that he would like to see the roadway
construction delayed until after the By-pass is constructed. He
also explained that he has been a resident in the area for 14
years and has had no problem with his water or septic tank.
Eldon Greenwood asked if any street lights would be installed or
if any street signs would be installed: "dead end" , and "watch
for children". The City Engineer responded that the residents
could petition for street lights whether or not the street is
constructed.
Mr. Greenwood asked if there were other alternatives to putting
in the road. The City Engineer responded that the City could
continue maintaining the road where there is some street
construction and where the area is unimproved it may be difficult
to maintain the area fast enough.
Cncl. Leroux stated that he does not like to see the cost of
excess maintanence borne by the rest of the City for bad streets;
however, he believes that this area is not ready for
improvements; he would also like to see the sewer and water
constructed to this area.
Mayor Reinke asked if there were any additional comments. There
were none.
Lebens/Leroux moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried
unanimously.
Wampach/Clay moved to put the Killarney Hills improvements on the
Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for a future date. Motion
carried unanimously.
Shakopee City Council
Page Three
May 12, 1987
Leroux/Clay moved for a five minute recess. Motion carried
unanimously.
Clay/Lebens moved to reconvene at 8:32 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously. (Mr. Wampach was absent. )
Lebens/Clay moved to open the public hearing on the proposed
improvements to Market Street from Second Avenue to Fourth Avenue
by street construction. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Engineer explained that the proposed improvements would
include the excavating of the existing street, construction of
curb, gutter, and bituminous surfacing, minimum storm sewer, and
a short sanitary sewer to replace an existing private sewer which
would be located in the street. This is a municipal state aid
route which requires the construction of a 44 foot wide street,
but that the City would only assess for a normal 36 foot wide
street.
Mr. Wampach returned.
The City Engineer explained that there was only a 7% difference
in the cost between constructing the 36 foot wide street and the
44 foot wide street. There are ten properties abutting the
proposed improvement, and seven are corner lots. All of the lots
are basically the same and if you take the cost of the
improvements and divide by the ten lots the cost of the
improvements is approximately $7,400 for each lot. The sanitary
sewer to serve the one property who has a private service would
cost approximately $8,300. Because one cannot prove that the
benefit to the lot would equal $8,300 it may be necessary to fund
part of the cost out of the sewer fund.
Mayor Reinke asked if there would be any problems with lime rock
in the area. The City Engineer responded that he did not
calculate for lime rock because the soil borings that were taken
didn't indicate that it was necessary.
Cncl. Leroux mentioned the possibility of vacating Market Street
and moving some houses. Discussion followed.
Kathy Gerlach, 4th and Market, asked if the City had looked at a
bare bones improvement. When they first approached the Council,
they were concerned with the dust.
Cncl. Clay asked if the sidewalk should be eliminated since this
is a local street. The City Engineer responded that the sidewalk
is included because this is potentially a collector street.
Shakopee City Council
Page Four
May 12, 1987 -
The City Engineer explained that as far as cutting down on the
scope of the project, the sidewal could be eliminated as well
as concrete driveways between the rb line and the sidewalk for
a reduction in the amount of $7,63 .00.
Kathy Gerlach asked if the sanitary sewer were included but it
didn't increase the value f the property, were there
alternatives to the total cost o the property owner.
Mayor R ink' answered that th City could do nothing or apply for
a grant (but there are no fu ds available at this time) . If the
cost fo the whole projec is too great and benefit cannot be
proven, he City may have t look at other alternatives such as
moving a ouse or closing street.
The City En ineer stated at the concept of vacating streets and
moving house is not a ba idea, but that he would hate to see
Market Street vacated at this time.
Mayor Reinke s arize that it appears to be the consensus that
this project is t pr tical or feasible as far as the property
owners are concern d.
Staff was asked to o ain additional information: (1) the cost of
providing calcium h oride to the street, (2) appraisal of
properties, ( 3) r uc g the scope of the work, and ( 4) the
possibility of crea ing c -de-sacs in the area.
Lebens/Clay moved o continu the public hearing on the proposed
improvements to M rket Street rom Second Avenue to Fourth Avenue
by street cons uction to ly 7, 1987. Motion carriedl
unanimously.
Leroux/Clay mov d to approve the pl ns and specifications for the
Parks Improvem t Project 1987-8 and authorize the City Engineer
to advertise aRequest for Bids.
Roll Call: Ay s: Wampach, Lebens, Ler Clay, Mayor Reinke
N es: None
M tion carried.
The City Administrator introduced a resolut on from the Minnesota
Valley Restoration .Project..and .the Scott Cc y Board as well as
a correspondance from Maurice H. Stans, t Stans Foundation,
regarding the Minnesota Valley Restoration Pr ject. Basically
what they ardL saying is that as one alternative 'resolution to the
current problem in the relationship between Minnesota Valley
Resolution Project and the Scott County Historical Society, the
City could reacquire the property under the paragraph III
reversion to the City in the original deed of the property to the
Scott County Historical Society. Discussion followed.
Shakopee City Council
Page Four
May 12, 1987
The City Engineer explained that as far as cutting down on the
scope of the project, the sidewalks could be eliminated as well
as concrete driveways between the curb line and the sidewalk for
a reduction in the amount of $7,632.00.
Kathy Gerlach asked if the sanitary sewer were included but it
didn't increase the value of the property, were there
alternatives to the total cost to the property owner.
Mayor Reinke answered that the City could do nothing or apply for
a grant (but there are no funds available at this time) . If the
cost for the whole project is too great and benefit cannot be
proven, the City may have to look at other alternatives such as
moving a house or closing a street.
The City Engineer stated that the concept of vacating streets and
moving houses is not a bad idea, but that he would hate to see
Market Street vacated at this time.
Mayor Reinke summarized that it appears to be the consensus that
this project is not practical or feasible as far as the property
owners are concerned.
Staff was asked to obtain additional information: (1) the cost of
providing calcium chloride to the street, ( 2) appraisal of
properties, (3 ) reducing the scope of the work, and ( 4) the
possibility of creating cul-de-sacs in the area.
Lebens/Clay moved to continue the public hearing on the proposed
improvements to Market Street from Second Avenue to Fourth Avenue
by street construction to July 7, 1987. Motion carried
unanimously.
Leroux/Clay moved to approve the plans and specifications for the
Parks Improvement Project 1987-8 and authorize the City Engineer
to advertise a Request for Bids.
Roll Call: Ayes: Wampach, Lebens, Leroux, Clay, Mayor Reinke
Noes: None
Motion carried.
The City Administrator introduced a resolution from the Minnesota
Valley Restoration .Project and the Scott County Board as well as
a correspondance from Maurice H. Stans, the Stans Foundation,
regarding the Minnesota Valley Restoration Project. Basically
what they are saying is that as one alternative resolution to the
current problem in the relationship between Minnesota Valley
Resolution Project and the Scott County Historical Society, the
City could reacquire the property under the paragraph III
reversion to the City in the original deed of the property to the
Scott County Historical Society. Discussion followed.
Shakopee City Council
Page Five
May 12, 1987
Leroux/Lebens directed appropriate City officials to start action
enforcing Section III of Ordinance No. 290, 3rd Series,
terminating the conveyance of the 87 acre Murphy's Landing site
to the Scott County Historical Society and return the ownership
of the site to the City of Shakopee; commence the establishment
of a Shakopee Historical Society; obtain a written ruling from
Scott County that they could continue to provide financial
support to the site if reacquired by the City; explore the
possibility of a lease vs. a deed to the organization which will
continue to operate the site; and bring back to the Council for
further action. Motion carried unanimously.
Lebens/wampach moved to appoint Judith S. Cox Acting City
Administrator from May 13 through May 17, 1987. Motion carried
unanimously.
The City Administrator informed the Council of major traffic
delays anticipated on Trunk Highway 169 near the Minnesota River
Bridge beginning May 11, 1987 as a result of the Minnesota
Department of Transportation's resurfacing 3.8 miles of road from
the river bridge to County State Aid Highway 1 in Eden Prairie.
Leroux/Lebens moved that the City enter into an agreement with
Messerli and Kramer as proposed by Mr. Robert G. Renner, Jr. in
his memo of May 11, 1987 and their proposal for lobbying
services.
Roll Call: Ayes: Lebens, Wampach, Leroux, Clay, Mayor Reinke
Noes: None
Motion carried.
Lebens/Wampach moved to adjourn to Tuesday, May 19, 1987 at 7:00
p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 10:05
p.m.
Judith S. Cox
Recording Secretary
City Clerk
May 22, 1987
Shakopee City Council
Shakopee, Minn.
To members of the board:
Due to increase of activities and re-arrangement of my
goals and priorities,I am submitting my resignation as the
city council appointee to the Shakopee Community Services
Board.
I wish to thank you for appointing me to the board and
giving me the opportunity to serve the community in a decision-
making position. I wish also to thank the staff and fellow
board members at Community Services for the positive experiences
I have had. You truly are dedicated people.
Sinegrely, 21 �Q
Gary Hnn
cc: John Anderson, City Adm.
George Muenchow, Director
RECEIVED
MAY ,6 190
CITY OF gF1AKpPEE
City of Lakeville
8747-208th St. P.O. Box 957 Lakeville.Minnesota 55044-8012 (612)469-4431
May 14,1987
City of Shakopee
129 First Av.
Shakopee,MN.55379
Dear Mayor and Council,
I am asking for your support of my candidacy for a directorship on
the League of Minnesota Board.
Many of you know me and of my activities in Dakota County and in
support of city government.I am enclosing a copy of my resume to
refresh your memory or to make you aware of what I have been involved
in during my terms on the Lakeville City Council.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
QO:7F
Betty Sindt,Councilmember
City of Lakeville
5630 W. 177th St.—Box 115
Farmington,149.55024 MAV \9 1961
(612)463-2024J\tY OF SHFK�P��
BETTY SIM /0,6
COUNCIL MEMBER
CITY of LAKEVILLE
5630 LI. 177th St. -Box 115
FARPffNGTON,MN. 55024
(612) 463 — 2024
LAKEVILLE CITY COUNCIL:
Currently serving second term.
ALF Ambulance Bo=!.representing Lakeville, 1986 - present.
Metropolitan Waste Management Advisory Committee, 1983 - present.
Dakota County Waste Advisory Committee, 1985 - present.
LEAGUE of SOTA CITIES:
District Coo for for Senate District 36 and 37, 5 years.
1) Set up m tinge between local elected officials and their
state legi store to discuss issues of importance to cities.
2) Arranged me places,menu,agendas and conducted meetings.
Served on the follo policy committees,
1) Government Struc a 'd General Legislation, 5 years.
2) Federal Legislation, years.
3) Planning Committee f 1 Meeting, 3 years.
4) Budget Committee, 1 6.
Served on the National of Ci "es Transportation and Communication
Steering Committee, 1986.
Minnesota Women in City rament, 7 ye s.
Served as a Director,Secretary,Vice-Presid t(1 year each),President.2
years,currently Immediate Past - President.
Minnesota Women Elected Officials, 7 years.
Served as a Director,Treasurer,currently 2nd Vice - President.
I have moderated panels atAnnualMeetings andatthe NetilyMected - -
Officials meetings:
BETTY SINDT 1 0,6
COUNCIL MEMBER
CITY of LAKEVILLE
5630 W. 177th St, -Box 115
FAB`1INCT0N,MN. 55024
(612) 463 - 2024
LAREVrT.Tv CITY COUNCIL:
Currently serving second term,
ALF Ambulance Boari.,representing Lakeville, 1986 - present,
Metropolitan Waste Management Advisory Committee, 1983 - present,
Dakota County Waste Advisory Committee, 1985 - present,
LEAGUE of MINNESOTA CITIES:
District Coordinator for Senate District 36 and 37, 5 years,
1) Set up meetings between local elected officials and their
state legislators to discuss issues of importance to cities,
2) Arranged meeting places,menu,agendas and conducted meetings,
Served on the following policy committees,
1) Government Structure and General Legislation, 5 years.
2) Federal Legislation, 4 years.
3) Planning Committee for Annual Meeting, 3 years.
4) Budget Committee, 1986.
Served on the National ,Leggue of Cities Transportation and Communication
Steering Committee, 1966,
Minnesota Women in City Government, 7 years.
Served as a Director,Secretary,Vice-President(1 year each),President.2
years,currently Immediate Past - President,
Minnesota Women Elected Officials, 7 years.
Served as a Director,Treasurer,currently 2nd Vice - President.
I have moderated panels atAnnualMeetings and at the Newly31ected "
Officials meetings. _. . .
/D c.
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF SHAKOPEE
P. 0. Box 113, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
May 22, 1987
Mr. John Anderson
City Administrator, City of Shakopee
Shakopee City Hall
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear Mr. Anderson:
The League of Women Voters of Shakopee has been asked to participate In a
project initiated by the Community Education Department of the Prior Lake
Public Schools. This project has been conceived to meet the need of educating
the public in Shakopee and Prior Lake on county, township, city and school
governmental processes. The decision has been made to produce four educational
video tapes on these four topics.
The role of the League of Women Voters of Shakopee will be to serve as program
coordinator, to define a tentative format, and to assist to the gathering of
information and the various production phases. Each governmental unit will
compile Information which they wish to Include In their presentation and each
(governmental unit) will be responsible for the cost of the final tape
(approximately $28.00).
We hope to make these tapes available to the schools and the libraries after
they have been shown on cable television in Shakopee and Prior Lake.
Please Include a copy of this letter in your next scheduled meeting agenda so
that all Council members can be Informed about this video production. This
project will be presented and discussed in detail at the Shakopee School
District's Compliance Meeting scheduled for June 11, 1987, at Murphy's Tavern.
We are Iooking forward to seeing you there.
Sincerely,
Jann�� ject Co—Chair
League of Women Voters of Shakopee
pECEtVE�
MAY 26 1981
C11Y OF SHAKOPEE
iav
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Douglas K. Wise, City Planner
RE: Upper Valley Drainageway
DATE. May 28, 1987
Introduction•
At their May 21, 1987 meeting the Planning Commission passed
a motion recommending the City establish a policy requiring all
plats approved from this date forward to dedicate land needed for
the drainageway project.
Background•
A number of plats draining into the proposed drainageway
have been approved or are under review by the Planning
Commission. Some of these plats propose easements for the
drainageway while others dedicate land. The Planning Commission
felt a more consistent policy for control of needed land should
be implemented.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council
establish the following policy : The City shall require land
needed for the Upper Valley Drainageway which is located in
proposed plats, be dedicated to the City. Due to the proposed
trail system through the drainageway the land may count toward
park dedication requirements. Land needed for the drainageway in
unplatted areas or plats previously filed may be obtained by
easement, however, if such areas are platted in the future the
land must be dedicated at that time.
Drainage
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Douglas K. Wise, City Planner
RE: 1988-92 Capital Improvements
DATE: May 28, 1987
Introduction:
The City Planning Commission at their meeting on May 21,
1987 passed a motion recommending approval of the 1988-92 Capital
Improvements Program.
Background:
The Planning Commission reviewed the Capital Improvements
Program as prepared by staff (attached) . The Planning Commission
recommends several minor changes.
Planning Commission Recommendations:
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the attached
1988-92 Capital Improvements Program with the following changes.
1. Priority #7 Market Street and #10 Apgar Street Project Areas
should both increase the entire length from lst Ave. to 10th
Ave.
2. Priority #61 Prior Lake Overflow should be reevaluated and
perhaps given a higher priority.
3. Construction of sidewalks on 4th Ave. from Fillmore Street
East should be added to the program.
Required Action:
Acceptance of the Planning Commission recommendations on the
1988-92 Capital Improvement Program.
� ZZ
; ; !
!! ! ; as
\ (!
129
lz
/ \ \//\ /}2 \ /\ /
-
: El
' / '
� S � �\ \ � .
\ / \aggs R& lzjR; : ail
\R \E_a ; z- ®\/ =-\ #\/
Ix
iz
g / \//\ \j2 \/ \\ \
^ / \�� 7j
\ } §/ \�/
g s
-
-
%
' 88 ; 8 isizm
-
%=S S 81 88
ti
-
I 8
:8
lz
_ 81
I I 1
Mass ! S> 88 : % 8-SS ' 85egmRe8S _
-� 18d�m� 1 M1_ .-. 81 .,SBM E—E-^ l ^a-- - - -
. . ie IS -
€S : Smm
Im _
zz-
e a - �_ S� - -
in
kaff
e€ SIC m s It
/a-6
o w
zt -- .
7a 71Z
Z9 �g
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator /2c—
FROM:
2c—
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Administrative Assistant
RE: Expanding the Dial-A-Ride Hours of Operation
DATE: May 27, 1987
Introduction•
Earlier this year the Energy and Transportation Committee
surveyed both the Dial-A-Ride riders and residents to determine
if there was enough interest to justify the expansion of the
Dial-A-Ride service hours. The results of these surveys were
positive and Committee is recommending that the Dial-A-Ride
Program be expanded to the evening hours (6 PM - 9 PM) during the
summer months.
Background:
On December 1, 1986 the Shakopee City Council approved
amending the Dial-A-Ride service contract agreement to provide
for the addition of a third Dial-A-Ride vehicle. The amendment
stated that the third vehicle would be made available to the City
of Shakopee for nine months (school months) with the remaining
months being the option of the City. Now that the school year is
coming to a close, the Energy and Transportation Committee is
recommending that the City exercise it's three month option
during the summer months.
Anticipating the three month option period, the Energy and
Transportation Committee surveyed users and residents to
determine if there was a need and interest in expanding the Dial-
A-Ride service hours to evenings and weekends. Survey results
revealed that there may be enough interest in supporting the
expansion of the Dial-A-Ride Program in to the evening hours
during the summer months. The surveys also reveal that there may
be enough interest in expanding the program in to Saturday.
However, the results supporting Saturday and Sunday service were
not as conclusive as the results supporting the expansion in to
the summer weekday evening hours.
On May 7, 1987 staff met with Michael Williams, Kare Kabs
Manager to discuss the possibility of exercising our three month
option. Kare Kabs is very interested in working with the City to
exercise the three month option. shown in attachment #1 is a
letter from Michael Williams addressing a proposal that we
discussed at our meeting. The proposal calls for the continued
operation of the third dial-a-ride vehicle during the summer
months (June 8 - Sept. 4) . The third unit will start at 1 P.M.
and end at it's service hours at 9 P.M. The other two vehicles
will continue operating on their normal schedules. Kare Kabs is
very willing to work with the City in developing a summer service
program that meets the needs of our residents. If demand for
service is greater than expected between 6 and 9 P.M. , Kare Kabs
is willing to look at altering the hours of operation of the
/a c
other two units to insure that the needs of our residents are
being met.
There is adequate funding av ilable within our existing
dial-a-ride budget to fund the expansion of our dial-a-ride
program into the evening hours dur' g the summer months.
Alternatives•
1. Move to exercise the City' three month Dial-A-Ride option
and expand the Dial-A-R' a service hours until 9 P.M. ,
Monday thru Friday for the time period June 8th - Sept. 4th.
2. Do not expand th dial a-ride service hours during the
summer months.
3. Pursue some other t of combination which will expand the
dial-a-ride service ho s in to the weekday evenings and on
Saturday.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends al rnative 1.
Action Requested:
Move exercise t City's three onth Dial-A-Ride option and
expand the dial-a-rid service hours ntil 9 P.M. , Monday thru
Friday for the time period June 8th - ept. 4th.
/a- c
other two units to insure that the needs of our residents are
being met.
There is adequate funding available within our existing
dial-a-ride budget to fund the expansion of our dial-a-ride
program into the evening hours during the summer months.
Alternatives•
1. Move to exercise the City's three month Dial-A-Ride option
and expand the Dial-A-Ride service hours until 9 P.M. ,
Monday thru Friday for the time period June 8th - Sept. 4th.
2. Do not expand the dial-a-ride service hours during the
summer months.
3. Pursue some other type of combination which will expand the
dial-a-ride service hours in to the weekday evenings and on
Saturday.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends alternative #1.
Action Requested:
Move exercise the City's three month Dial-A-Ride option and
expand the dial-a-ride service hours until 9 P.M. , Monday thru
Friday for the time period June 8th - Sept. 4th.
Attachment kl
1198 TERRACE DRIVE � ROREVILLE, MN 55113 � 636@191
May 11 , 1987
Mr. Barry Stock
Administrative Assistant
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Mr. Stock:
I would like to present the following proposal to continue the
(3) three months of optional service (June 8th to September 4th)
on the third Dial-A-Ride unit. Per our conversation and review.
of the recent survey, I feel the community will be best served
by expanding the hours of operation to 9:00 PM Monday thru Friday.
The third unit will start at 1:00 PM and end at 9:00 PM. This
will account for the additional (8) eight hours per day, of service,
contracted for in November 1986. The other (2) two units will
continue operating on their normal schedules. If demand for the
service is greater than expected between 6:00 - 9:00 PM, we will
also look at altering the hours of operation on the other two
units. Our primary concern is to meet the needs of the Shakopee
community and continue full operation through the summer.
We have already made arrangements with our employees to change
their work schedules providing approval by the City of Shakopee
is given. If you have any questions or concerns please contact
me.
Sincerely, I
Michael Williams
Location Manager
5�
�4 A DIVISIONs - oF
- ��w Ryder Transport, Ind
is C�
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Administrative Assistant
RE: Community Energy Council Grant Application
DATE: May 27, 1987
Introduction•
On May 21, 1987, the Shakopee Energy and Transportation
Committee moved to recommend to City Council that the appropriate
City officials be authorized to submit a grant application to the
Department of Energy and Economic Development (DEED) for funding
under the State' s Community Energy Council Grant Program.
Background:
For the past few months the Energy and Transportion
Committee has been discussing possible programs which would be
eligible for funding under DEED' s Community Energy Council Grant
Program. The Committee is proposing a multi-pronged strategy
comprised of three components designed to promote and encourage
energy conservation and awareness.
The home energy check-up (HECU) portion of the application
will reach 175 homes in Shakopee. The HECU project has four
primary goals: 1. A quick, practical audit. 2. Installation
of basic infiltration measures with hands-on instruction about
weatherization techniques and needs. 3. A discussion about
sensible major conservation investments and available funding
sources, and 4. An opportunity to follow-up to encourage the
resident to undertake further weatherization, ask questions etc.
Minnegasco has agreed to provide $80.00 per audit to help
fund the HECU portion of our program. The audit will be
performed by our assistant building inspector and funding is
available to pay for his time spent on the project. Staff has
also been in contact with Shakopee Public Utilities to determine
if they would like to participate in our program. On June 1,
1987 I will appear before SPDC to request them to match
Minnegasco' s offer for those homes in Shakopee that have electric
heat not to exceed 25 homes.
The second component of the grant application the Committee
is proposing, would provide funding to implement a demonstration
recycling program for two apartment complexes in Shakopee. The
Community Energy Council Grant would primarily fund promotional
materials (flyers, posters, direct mail) to implement this
program on a six month demonstration basis. Additionally the
program would fund the transportation costs that the Shakopee
Area Catholic Schools are presently paying in connection with the
delivery of aluminum/steel cans to market. (Approximately
$400.00 a year) .
l a.�
The final component of the grant application the Committee
is recommending involves our transit program. The Committee is
recommending that the grant application request funding to
implement a six month demonstration program which focuses on
expanding dial-a-ride service to Saturdays between the hours of
10 AM and 3 PM (these times are flexible) . The Committee is also
recommending that funding beequested to promote the
implementation of a reverse van
ores
program. The grant
application will be requesting f ding for start-up costs and
money to subsidize a reverse van poo for a six month period just
to get the program started.
The total grant application is equesting $15,000 in funding
from the Community Energy Council Gr nt Program over a one year
period. The City would have to p ovide a 10% local match or
$1,500. Money is available in th City' s contingency fund for
the City' s 10% match. Staff is w rking on devising a method to
make the City' s match an in-ki d contribution. If I am
successful it will of be necessary for us to use the contingency
fund. When you add 'n the money t at we will be receiving from
Minnegasco ( $12,000) and possible funding from SPUC ($2,000) the
total program budget wi 1 be in ex ess of $30,000.
I have been in con ct wit the Department of Energy and
Economic Development to de ermin if the aforementioned program
components are eligible for ndi g. They have responded in the
affirmative. The proposed pr r will include funding to hire a
part time person (intern) assist in implementing and
monitoring the elements di ussed in the proposed grant
application.
Shown in attachment #1 is R sol tion #2735. The resolution
is required to be submitted in onjunction with the grant
application and authorizes the appr riate City officials to
submit the grant application an enter to an agreement with the
State of Minnesota should the gr nt appl cation be approved.
Alternatives:
1. Move to approve Resolution #2735 authorizing the appropriate
City officials to submit a Community Energy Council Grant
Application.
2. Do not approve Resolution #2735 and do not submit a grant
application to the Department of Energy and Economic
Development.
3. Make suggestions to improve the grant proposal and recommend
that it be submitted to the Department of Energy and
Economic Development for funding under the State' s Community
Energy Council Grant Program.
rib
The final component of the grant application the Committee
is recommending involves our transit program. The Committee is
recommending that the grant application request funding to
implement a six month demonstration program which focuses on
expanding dial-a-ride service to Saturdays between the hours of
10 AM and 3 PM (these times are flexible) . The Committee is also
recommending that funding be requested to promote the
implementation of a reverse van pool program. The grant
application will be requesting funding for start-up costs and
money to subsidize a reverse van pool for a six month period just
to get the program started.
The total grant application is requesting $15,000 in funding
from the Community Energy Council Grant Program over a one year
period. The City would have to provide a 10% local match or
$1,500. Money is available in the City's contingency fund for
the City's 10% match. Staff is working on devising a method to
make the City's match an in-kind contribution. If I am
successful it will not be necessary for us to use the contingency
fund. When you add in the money that we will be receiving from
Minnegasco ($12,000) and possible funding from SPUC ($2,000) the
total program budget will be in excess of $30,000.
I have been in contact with the Department of Energy and
Economic Development to determine if the aforementioned program
components are eligible for funding. They have responded in the
affirmative. The proposed program will include funding to hire a
part time person (intern) to assist in implementing and
monitoring the elements discussed in the proposed grant
application.
Shown in attachment #1 is Resolution #2735. The resolution
is required to be submitted in conjunction with the grant
application and authorizes the appropriate City officials to
submit the grant application and enter into an agreement with the
State of Minnesota should the grant application be approved.
Alternatives•
1. Move to approve Resolution #2735 authorizing the appropriate
City officials to submit a Community Energy Council Grant
Application.
2. Do not approve Resolution #2735 and do not submit a grant
application to the Department of Energy and Economic
Development.
3 . Make suggestions to improve the grant proposal and recommend
that it be submitted to the Department of Energy and
Economic Development for funding under the State' s Community
Energy Council Grant Program.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends alternative #1.
Action Requested:
Move to approve Resolution #2735 authorizing the appropriate
City officials to submit a Community Energy Council Grant
Application.
RESOLUTION NO. 2735
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROPRIATE CITY OFFICIALS
TO SUBMIT A COMMUNITY ENERGY COUNCIL
GRANT APPLICATION
WHEREAS, the City Council would take to become more actively
involved in establishing policies and programs that promote
improved energy efficiency and energy conservation; and
WHEREAS, the MN Department of Energy and Economic
Development requires a Council resolution authorizing the
appropriate city official to submit an application for Community
Energy Council Grant funding.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the City Administrator be
authorized to submit an application to the MN. Dept. of energy
and Economic Development for funding under the Community Energy
Council Grant Program for a Home Energy Conservation program in
Shakopee with a 10% local match not to exceed $1,500 to be taken
from the city contingency fund.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that should the grant application be
accepted by the Department of Energy and Economic Development,
the Mayor, City Administrator and City Clerk be authorized to
enter into a grant agreement with the State of Minnesota for the
aforementioned program.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
1987.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1987.
City Attorney
/3 /T
3. The City could recommend that it is inappropriate for
Council to settle this issue and allow the issue to be
resolved in small claims ourt or in the County Court. The
rationale for taking t is approach would be that City
Council would be allo ing a disinterested third party to
make the appropri ustments for the City and Mr. Van
Heel in resolving this i e.
Recommendation
The Committee recommends alternative No. 1 for the reasons
discussed above.
Action Requested
Authorize the appropriate City officials to reimburse Mr. Virgil
Van Heel for out-of-pocket expenses totaling $1,833. 07 for which
Mr. Van Heel cannot be otherwise compensated because of errors
made on the part of the City and Mr. Van Heel in approving and
then amending his original building permit.
JKA/jms
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator 13 a/
RE: Reimbursement Request by Virgil Van Heel for
Expenses Incurred Relating to the Construction
of a Utility Building
DATE: May 26, 1987
Introduction
The Shakopee City Council, at its regular May 19, 1987 meeting,
instructed the Property Acquisition Committee to meet with Mr.
Van Heel to further negotiation his request for reimbursement.
On May 26, 1987, John Leroux, Dennis Kraft, LeRoy Houser and I
met with Mr. Van Heel at City Hall.
Proposed Settlement
The meeting with Mr. Van Heel resulted in agreement on an
approach to handling his itemized costs. It was agreed that the
City would handle out-of-pocket costs and that Mr. Van Heel would
absorb all of his time and labor costs. Mr. Houser computed the
cost of a 16 ' x 20' slab based upon the going construction rate
at $725.00. To this base the City added $47.00 in paint, $75.00
in returned lumber, $271.07 in non-returnable trusses, $585.00
for replacement of a 7 or 8 inch diameter tree with a 5 inch
diameter tree, $50.00 in dirt, $20.00 on loss on cement blocks
and $60.00 for sod and dirt to replace the slab. This totals
$1,833.07 in out-of-pocket costs for Mr. Van Heel. The City
would receive from Mr. Van Heel the paint worth $47.00 and will
pick up the trusses worth $271.07 at Menards for possible use by
the Park Department.
Alternatives
1. Approve the compromise recommended by the Committee. The
Committee' s approach to computing out-of-pocket costs was to
compute the going rate for the construction of a 16 ' x 20'
concrete slab and add to that other specific out-of-pocket
costs. The $1,833.07 is 92% of the . $1,992.08 that Mr. Van
Heel originally submitted and is 50% of Mr. Van Heel's
revised estimate ($1,992.08 plus $1,705.00 equaling
$3,697.08) . The major portion of the $1,705.00 was for Mr.
Van Heel's time away from his normal job at his normal rate
of pay.
2. Council can modify the Committee' s recommended settlement.
This will require that the Committee either meet again with
Mr. Van Heel or that the Council make a final offer which,
if not accepted, would mean the next step would be small
claims court or litigation.
'i
mow, R'w
v�
i �0 �?
Vi
a v
3• The / �!/
Councilty settle recommend that it is
resolved o this issue allow inappropriate for
small cla' and
rationale ims court or in the the issue to be
for taking this County court. The
Council would be 9thiapproach would be
make theallowing a disinterested third that City
Heel in appropriate adjustments for the Party to
resolving this issue. City and Mr. Van
Recommendation
The Committee recommends alternative No. 1 for
discussed above.
the reasons
Action R_`ted
Authorize the appropriate City officials to reimburse
Van Heel for out-of-pocket expenses totaling $1,833.07 for which
Mr. Van Heel cannot �'• Virgil
then on the part be otherwise compensated because of errors
made amending of the y and Mr. Van Heel in a
his original building permit. approving and
JKA/jms
/ (
i�,( ErQ�
� — NLS
:5d" ✓ � s��_ �
740
<
oft � ��
I3h
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City C1 erkL.'(�
RE: Re-Naming 13th Avenue UU
DATE: May 29, 1987
INTRODUCTION:
The attached petition has been submitted requesting that the name
of the street referred to as 13th Avenue be "Vierling Drive" .
BACKGROUND:
On April 21, Council moved to create a contest for a new name for
13th Avenue and on April 29th the Shakopee Valley News carried an article
inviting residents to submit names to the City. We have received no
recommended names other than on the attached petition.
ALTERNATIVES:
1] Retain the name 13th Avenue
2] Re-name right-of-way Vierling Drive
31 Select some other name
4] Select a street within a new plat to bear the name of Vierling
Drive
ACTION RECOMMENDED:
Determine whether or not to re-name 13th Avenue. If a new name is
selected direct staff to prepare the proper ordinance designating the
name selected.
jc
MAV 27 1981
CITY AkOPEE _
F4e ZrF��
("Au
VAY27 )�7
i LRy pblF'SIiA 0!
jf<,nu XkL u/ 3[ei; duo Lk'e zm act
./L� ° // ' ' .!�',-Lodi `z._'.v !..�Ls/-le�r✓ s�• i'G.tu
d u�C�, /j Gtt 24� /i,sL�fti✓
I
�(l+�G�LGL�" •
1/--r� , �5 ) 3b
i
s VS-
-210
s � 3b
7o
..: �i.(6 G�-L zftG�/.J/idGL� b�n� �-Cr�✓
C'aLP� ZFs PoP& sem,7,2
55 y
o79
pp '� 4 l y �
-715 i'Y),J,x 5{ :541.*ctui
/ X36
fJRr�w cNl��) �'/7ltL ��( // p��G�JZoj�le��✓�/3 =CCt.L
J-�'-L. 51�`j/�Vj W�'GN H�"I.pfh�P�l LL.�[J/ `//Ll%�Gf/'✓ vy /��iG�
... ,d7.t��,Lmd.6�ii G�-cJ4u� Zs{.l(�.CeZi,d1�iii✓ GL'�14 rte✓ . . -
i
�a i z&3 Pcek st �Fc
10 59f.
76 a/91,
fa �
rrs99
X/ .6,
-44
3 60 .2
13 h
?Zq a�e 5i�. �
W9�_Wo� Q40 S. /nH�N 5+. SHAr:OPF�
"<. A-mn;:.y. /_�3 711/ 74LN.t.ta.✓a<
Ae
�/nv )117 r1 o�rve Siak��e L.
0 &af" ll54 Sash 19 ; Y Sh
��.k..c WQlank�eiL i000 svd klvc E. ��
1�N f0 7
t
�,�/�r,� YaG 2„•� 7-�
,71 71lrm�" 8/S G L(,6 s.e
713 - ES,9a---, �
-73Y ,W�S�cA�4�n�..
(03/ vnnn-Rs //
` -
1zAo
S �S
`?%fir zee s X,4G ..�hLe� Z aaJWe
%3T—v`Lrie
s1J�f s r�i sG /tet 44-
-- 1070
i v �N,ti, y s7
S� F
1090 ly/
`�"", c�i.s✓ lo9to
II
s )s
/3�h
1J<me� Zit �LThtaf . 'LZ a<J /3
_/ l i / �L(fP/ Gam.%/ �✓�E'�>'✓
;:; ,aL7ld 4� �.-Z�q�oLG'd`i✓ (,d`�..Gcl� '
z � -�o �
tk� ' T
199 Gtu�ti• y 5-r.
-oaf,
I
1070 ry14 �
. GLS u� ,d1i 9a-zL �/dy
G X'd74' d-ld.G.a.,-ems
I
EAGLE CREEK
Township 115,116 Range 22 l3 6
-
N,�...a.Ntgti..ya
Cnw.nmenl
Co.mly 0.o.ds s. p„�, B,ula„y: • SU. P.dR.:.
NENNIPEN COUNTY 5
31 32 33 . 34 d
..N .� ..w
LAKE
Mn^ �
®ted '
•.,. rid' a -
' �N
� pm+ NFxbJ i(l.T dm• �
wo* _Jd1
11 Npvh// ��S�cG w
fJi�' � �a � • :w dd N v ,desyN?.is 2�
1 1 `abnw '
' FemaM � A..�F � F N r. � • h�l�
jxM ,
8 N
t -- 33 w °.. �-y a[ay%* �� �ti • �+ Abc/ fi/%f w •.
9 .• e �• T� ,��.•y - t t ��.. qe/+w M A/kivd � i`.. ��n
1 y.
r .N�„I. p i 9uebr' rs gz-%w ow
-
e n a.aGe. � ➢9ffi' }1l4 �d as N eF, •F • 3e}/m: {_,``!,a� .
t �f snuld LAKE NfHIP �! tN
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Utility Hook-ups for Twin Homes
DATE: May 27, 1987
Introduction
The Shakopee City Council, at its regular May 19, 1987 meeting,
requested that staff review City policy regarding twin home
utility hook-ups. Council was concerned that plats approved with
the 10% limit on twin home lots permitted developers to put twin
homes on single family home utilities stubbed out under newly
constructed streets.
Background
The attached memo dated March 13, 1981 and approved by Council on
March 19, 1981 established the administrative policy permitting
the use of (wyes) only when the street is already in place. This
policy implies a requirement for individual sewer and water
service hook-ups to twin homes when the street is not in place.
The second memo attached dated March 19, 1981 from LeRoy Houser
indicated that this policy permitting (wyes) in 3/4" water lines
was not without problems.
A second issue, not raised by City Council, but brought up by the
City Clerk, was the City's ability to monitor the 10% twin home
requirement through a separate agreement. The Clerk was
concerned about City staff's ability to monitor several plats
each with an approved 10% twin home capacity to prevent
developers from building more than the 10% permitted. The
Planning Department does not currently monitor each plat to
insure that the 10% maximum is not exceeded, and also doubts our
ability to monitor the 10% limit effectively for several plats.
The City Planner and Community Development Director both believe
that the proper regulation of twin home development should be
spelled out in the zoning ordinance, not simply established by
City policy and enforced through a developers agreement. They
recommend amending the zoning ordinance and the Community
Development Director indicated that his staff would like some
time to properly address the issue. The dilemma is to balance
the need for protection provided by a zoning ordinance with the
need for developer flexibility in a competitive metropolitan
region with cities that permit wyes for twin home development.
Short Term Alternatives
1. The City can continue its present 10% policy with no further
requirements. This maximizes developers flexibility.
13 �
2. The City can continue its 10% policy and simply require the
developer to identify the location of the twin homes prior
to final plat approval or prior to construction of streets
within the subdivision. This alternative maximizes the
protection provided by the zoning ordinance and minimizes
the flexibility provided the developer.
3. The City could continue the 10% policy but restrict twin
home development to lots on collector streets, intersections
or abutting property with more intensive land uses. This
alternative provides a middle ground between alternative No.
1 and No. 2.
4. The City cou d require the eveloper to identify potential
twin home 'tes and ins all one inch water services that
could either erve a single family home or be "wyed" without
causing reduce pressure oblems if a twin home was built.
The City will s ill requir a "wye" and clean out riser in
the right-of-way for the sanitary sewer service to a twin
home. This alter tive pr vents cutting the new street for
the additional se ice to the twin home but does mean party
wall agreements cov ing ilities. This alternative can be
combined with alterna ive No. 1, 2 or 3.
Long Term Alternatives
The long term alternatives are similar to the short term -
alternatives, but would be ablished in the zoning ordinance
after further study. Further s dy might lead to the development
of additional alternatives nd/ the modification of the four
alternatives listed above.
Recommendation
The City Clerk, Communit Develo ent Director, City Planner,
Building Inspector and City Engineer have participated in the
review of this issue. It is our rec endation that short term
alternative No. 3 and 4 be adopted as administrative policy by
Council, and that staff be direct d to study this for
incorporation in the City's zoning ordina ce.
Action Requested
1. Within new subdivisions twin homes are restricted to lots on
collector streets, intersections or abutting property with
more intensive land uses; and that the developer identify
potential twin homes sites and install one inch water
services to them.
2. Direct the appropriate City officials to study the
incorporation of the administrative policy dated May 27,
1987 into the permanent zoning ordinance of the City.
JKA/jms
I3 C!,
2. The City can continue its 108 policy and simply require the
developer to identify the location of the twin homes prior
to final plat approval or prior to construction of streets
within the subdivision. This alternative maximizes the
protection provided by the zoning ordinance and minimizes
the flexibility provided the developer.
3. The City could continue the 108 policy but restrict twin
home development to lots on collector streets, intersections
or abutting property with more intensive land uses. This
alternative provides a middle ground between alternative No.
1 and No. 2.
4. The City could require the developer to identify potential
twin home sites and install one inch water services that
could either serve a single family home or be "wyed" without
causing reduced pressure problems if a twin home was built.
The City will still require a "wye" and clean out riser in
the right-of-way for the sanitary sewer service to a twin
home. This alternative prevents cutting the new street for
the additional service to the twin home but does mean party
wall agreements covering utilities. This alternative can be
combined with alternative No. 1, 2 or 3 .
Long Term Alternatives
The long term alternatives are similar to the short term
alternatives, but would be established in the zoning ordinance
after further study. Further study might lead to the development
of additional alternatives and/or the modification of the four
alternatives listed above.
Recommendation
The City Clerk, Community Development Director, City Planner,
Building Inspector and City Engineer have participated in the
review of this issue. It is our recommendation that short term
alternative No. 3 and 4 be adopted as administrative policy by
Council, and that staff be directed to study this for
incorporation in the City' s zoning ordinance.
Action Requested
1. Within new subdivisions twin homes are restricted to lots on
collector streets, intersections or abutting property with
more intensive land uses; and that the developer identify
potential twin homes sites and install one inch water
services to them.
2. Direct the appropriate City officials to study the
incorporation of the administrative policy dated may 27,
1987 into the permanent zoning ordinance of the City.
JKA/jms
@�Mtleu Pat'-)
• MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Request from Bill Chard
Developer of Eastview to Attach "Wyes" to the
In Place Sanitary Sewers
DATE: March 13 , 1981
Introduction
The City has received the attached letter from Bill Chard regarding
the above request.. Mr. Chard is making this request because he
wishes to build twin homes which would require cutting the street
for the additional sewer line under our "current practice" of
requiring an individual line for each home.
Background
Current City practice is to require, as noted above, individual
connections. We have required new duplexes, twin homes or double
bungalows to put in individual sewer laterals in nearly all cases
(The Building Inspector says we allowed "wyes" for Dick Wiggin' s
town houses on Polk Street. ) Council should consider the following
iin reviewing Mr. Chard' s request:
1 . It would save the developer the expense of cutting the street
for the additional lateral.
2. It would require joint ownership and maintenance responsibility
for the lateral from the "wye" to the main.
3 . The joint ownership, even when noted in the deed, could become
another area for a dispute between owners that the City will
be drawn into.
4. The Public Works Director does not believe that we would have
additional maintenance problems, but that the developer should
be required to put in a clean-out at the "wye" to eliminate
some of the potential problems mentioned in n3 above.
5 . Our Building Inspector and Ray Southworth of FHA indicate that
the practice is permitted as long as the jointly owned line is
in the City Boulevard.
6. Coon Rapids and Bloomington both permit "wyes" (only Metro
cities checked) for existing streets but encourage the indivi-
dual lateral whenever they know there will be twin home con-
struction.
Request from Bill Chard /
Page Two
March 13, 1981
7 . Ray Southworth of FHA recommend , and Mr. Chard has concurred ,
that the party w 11 agreement s ould include a phrase regarding
the joint owners ip and maint nance of the lateral from the
"wye" to the main.
Alternatives
1. Continue with the curr n policy.
2 . Permit "wyes".
3 . Permit "wyes" only when the street is already in place .
Recommendation
It is staff' s recommendation that a ernative #3 be approved .
JRA/jms
( 3 c
Request from Bill Chard
Page Two
March 13 , 1981
7 . Ray Southworth of FHA recommends, and Mr. Chard has concurred,
that the party wall agreement should include a phrase regarding
the joint ownership and maintenance of the lateral from the
"wye" to the main.
Alternatives
1. Continue with the current policy.
2. Permit "wyes".
3. Permit "wyes" only when the street is already in place.
Recommendation
It is staff ' s recommendation that alternative ,"r3 be approved.
JKA/jms
i
�y 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee. Minnesota 55379
1
_- M E M o a1
V
John K. Anderson, City Administrate ✓ /3�,
FROM: LeRoy Houser• \\
SUBJECT: "Wyss" in Fast View Addn.
DATE: March 19 , 1981
Our discussion regarding "wyes" was addressing sewer lines only.
3 Should they expect to "wye" off of the 3/4" water line stubbed
1 into the property my approval will not be forth comming.
1 The problems presented by wyeing the 3/4" water line is as follows:
1 . Reduced pressure to both units at peak use time within the
units. (unregulated shower and bath water should both units
be bathing at same time, or one unit bathing and the other
watering lawns etc. )
2. Should one unit contaminate its water supply by direct
connections, both units have contaminated water supply
systems.
The question you are going to pose is; the same principle applys
to contamination of apartment units. My answer is this is correct;
However, apartment tennents do not own their units in "fee simple"
which legally provides protection against encroachment of services
delivered by the City.
I have told you before, there is not a code against what is pro-
posed and you have permitted, and there is not a code saying
they cannot "wye" off the water line. However, it is my opinion
and recommendation that if this is permitted then we must adopt
a policy requiring a double check vacuum breaker, commonly known
as a backflow preventer on the main supply line before the meter.
LFH:plk �---
.l
J
/3 d
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, Community Development Director
RE: The Hiring of an Appraiser for the 13th Avenue Right-
of-way in East Shakopee
DATE: May 27, 1987
Introduction•
The City of Shakopee is in the process of acquiring property
for 13th Avenue in East Shakopee. Attempts to purchase the
property from the owner were unsuccessful, therefore eminent
domain proceedings have been initiated. As a part of this
process the City must hire an appraiser to determine fair market
value of the property.
Background•
The subject property is located in extreme Eastern Shakopee
along the South half of a part of 13th Avenue. The subject
property has a width of 33 feet and a length of .567.47 feet. The
area of the property is 18,726.51 sq. feet.
This property was originally located in Eagle Creek Township
and came into the City as a part of an annexation project. It
was earlier believed that the entire right-of-way was publicly
owned. It was later determined that only half of this part of
the road had publicly owned right-of-way and that the south half
of the roadway was owned by Mr. Perry Cheever. Negotiations were
carried out between the City staff and Mr. Cheever for a period
of months however it was not possible to arrive at a mutually
agreeable value for this parcel. Subsequent to that the City
initiated eminent domain proceedings against Mr. Cheever for the
property. In preparation for the legal action on this parcel of
land the City must obtain an appraisal.
Several real estate appraisers were contacted and only two
have expressed an interest in doing the project within the time
frame prescribed by the City. Other appraisers were interested,
however the appraisal workload has increased recently and time
became a problem with these other appraisers. The most
reasonable appraisal proposal for this property has been
submitted by Mr. Jim Link. Mr. Link has indicated that he will
complete the appraisal within 2-4 weeks at a cost of no more than
$800.00. Because of the need to pave the street this summer
action must be taken on this project inthenear future.
Alternatives•
1. Authorize the City Administrator to enter into an agreement
with Mr. Jim Link for appraisal on the 13th Avenue property
for an amount not to exceed $800.00.
2. Do not authoriz this agree nt at this time and instruct
the City staff to search fu her in an attempt to find an
appraiser to det mine th fair market value of the subject
property.
Recommendation:
It is recommended tha the City Council authorize the City
Administrator to enter i to a contract with Mr. Jim Link to
prepare a real estate ap rai 1 for the 18,726 sq. foot parcel of
property located adjac t to 3th Avenue in East Shakopee for an
amount not to exceed $ 0.00.
/3 d
2. Do not authorize this agreement at this time and instruct
the City staff to search further in an attempt to find an
appraiser to determine the fair market value of the subject
property.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City
Administrator to enter into a contract with Mr. Jim Link to
prepare a real estate appraisal for the 18,726 sq. foot parcel of
property located adjacent to 13th Avenue in East Shakopee for an
amount not to exceed $800.00.
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Engineero-
SUBJECT: Prior Lake Spring Lake Watershed District
DATE: May 27 , 1987
INTRODUCTION 6 BACKGROUND:
At their March 17 , 1987 meeting, Council directed staff to notify
the Prior Lake-Spring Lake Watershed District ( PLSLWD) that
certain actions were expected regarding the outfall channel
project or the City would seek arbitration to settle the dispute.
The expected actions consisted of plans and specifications for
improvements to the channel consistent with the joint powers
agreement between the City and PLSLWD. That action was to be
completed by May 19, 1987 ( see attached letter dated March 19 ,
1987.
The PLSLWD responded with the attached letter dated May 13, 1987 .
From the letter, it appears the Managers of the PLSLWD feel that
they have no further contractual obligation to the City and their
activities are subject to DNR authority. If Council wishes to
pursue completion of the channel in accordance with the joint
powers agreement , the next action would be to file for
arbitration.
RECOMMENDATION:
The dispute over the condition of the channel has been ongoing
for quite some time . Although the PLSLWD has attempted to
correct the erosion problems through various maintenance
procedures, much work still remains to be done as per the
attached February 2, 1987 engineer' s report. It is recommended
that the City file for arbitration as per Section 8 .02 of the
joint powers agreement.
REQUESTED ACTION:
Move to direct the Assistant City Attorney to invoke the
arbitration clause, Section 8.02, of the joint powers agreement,
dated June 2, 1981 , between the City of Shakopee, City of Prior
Lake, and the Prior Lake-Spring Lake Watershed District.
KA/pmp
JOINT
/ 3
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
INCORPORATED 1870
129 EAST FIRST AVENUE,SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379-1376 (612)44&3650
March 19, 1987
Don Benson
Prior Lake-Spring Lake Watershed District
Scott-Rice Telephone Building
4690 Colorado Street
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Prior Lake Outlet Channel
Board of Managers:
At the Shakopee Cit Coun it meeting of March 17 , 1987 , I
presented various pro osal for remedying the construction
problems associated with th outlet channel of Prior Lake within
the City of Shakopee. Th roposals considered by Council were
those conveyed to me by t LSLWD Engineer over the course of
several meetings, site in sp cti s, and telephone conversations.
Council directed me to not fy you th t they are not interested in
pursuing any proposa s short constructing and/ or
reconstructing the outl t system to nform to the originally
approved plans and specif' cations. They lso indicated that the
plans for this work must be submitted to hem for review within
60 days, or the City will enforce the provi 'ons of Article VIII ;
Resolutions of Dispute of the Joint Powers AS eement.
If you have any questions regarding this action, do not hesitate
to contact me-
Sincerely
e_ -
Sincerely, '
//_ // _✓./ _ll�
-en
rte Ashf 11 ' ,
City Engineer
KA/pmp
OUTLET
cc: John K. Anderson, City Admin.
Allen Kremer, Hickok and Assoc.
Rod Krass
The Heart of Progress Valley
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
INCORPORATED 1870 R,
129 EAST FIRST AVENUE,SHAKOPEE. MINNESOTA 553791376 (6121005-3650 '
uy
March 19, 1987
Don Benson
Prior Lake-Spring Lake Watershed District
Scott-Rice Telephone Building
4690 Colorado Street
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Prior Lake Outlet Channel
Board of Managers :
At the Shakopee City Council meeting of March 17 , 1987 , I
presented various proposals for remedying the construction
problems associated with the outlet channel of Prior Lake within
the City of Shakopee. The proposals considered by Council were
those conveyed to me by the PLSLWD Engineer over the course of
several meetings, site inspections, and telephone conversations.
Council directed me to notify you that they are not interested in
pursuing any proposals short of constructing and/ or
reconstructing the outlet system to conform to the originally
approved plans and specifications. They also indicated that the
plans for this work must be submitted to them for review within
60 days, or the City will enforce the provisions of Article VIII ;
Resolutions of Dispute of the Joint Powers Agreement.
If you have any questions regarding this action, do not hesitate
to contact me.
Sincerely
'
City Engineer
KA/pmp
OUTLET
cc: John K. Anderson, City Admin.
Allen Kremer, Hickok and Assoc.
Rod Kress
The Heart of Progress Valley
PRIOR LAKE-SPRING LAKE WATERSHED DISTRICT
Don O. Benson Scott-Rice Telephone Bldg.
Stall Coordinator 4690 Colorado St. S.E. RECEIVED
Prior
(612) 447-4166 Prior Lake. MN 55372
MAY 1 B 190
13
� May 13, 1987 CITY OF SHAKOPE
The .Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379-1376
RE: Prior Lake Outlet Project
Gentlemen:
This letter is intended to respond to the March 19, 1987
letter of Ken Ashfeld to Don Benson, requesting that the Prior
Lake-Spring Lake Watershed District submit to the Shakopee City
Council its plans for completion of the Prior Lake Outlet
Project.
A history of the work that has been done within the Shakopee
corporate limits, with a maintenance plan for future work, is
attached to this letter. These were prepared by the District' s
engineers, E. A. Hickok and Associates. The outlet project
itself was substantially completed by the end of 1982 and this
Watershed District has undertaken considerable restoration and
maintenance work in accordance with its warranty and maintenance
obligations under the Joint Powers Agreement.
The only work from the original project remaining to be done
and for which the warranty period has not run, in our view, is
the installation of the Deans Lake diversion structure. This
gate will be installed shortly.
Significant erosion has taken place in certain portions of
the outlet channel since construction, owing to the exceptional
precipitation in the years 1982 through 1986 and the resulting
need to use the channel before vegetation growth could take place
to stabilize the channel banks. It has become apparent to the
Watershed District that the restoration measures already under-
taken, if repeated, would not significantly remove the underlying
erosion problem. The Watershed District has therefore chosen to
install a series of check dams to slow the flow of water and the
'4
t Di
.
1t
—'mss
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Shakopee
Page 2
May 13 , 1987
resulting erosion, and to allow the hannel banks to stabilize.
To the extent these represent Chang s to the original plans and
specifications of the project, the atershed District has adopted
them under its conclusive design a thority in Section 3 .02 of the
Joint Powers Agreement.
We wish to make it clear tha , contrary to the view expressed
by Mr. Ashfeld 'n a March 5, 198 memorandum to John Anderson,
the inspection a d approval aut rity for the outlet project
rests entirely wi h the Minneso a Department of Natural
Resources. Under he Joint Pow rs Agreement, Shakopee's inspec-
tion and approval a thorty do not extend to the project
completion but is li 'ted to e aluation of channel capacity and
unimpeded flow of wate at ti s when the watershed District pro-
poses to open the outle and elease water from Prior Lake. We
have worked closely with a apartment of Natural Resourc
throughout the project and a received its agDroval ko
fkg :-ec ear rathe _Lite zrece ry aesi.gn changes .
It is and has been the. i tent n of this watershed District,
s!=s 4Lta ncegh.ivn pf t'ne tle't iiro9eet.__to
" "- City of-Shakopee and all otlfer affec d agencies in creating a
project that benefits all cncerned. ltimately, however, the
watershed District must ha a control o r the design and imple-
mentation of the project, subject to appkoval of the permitting
authority, which is the Minnesota Deparnt of Natural
Resources. The Joint Powers Agreement re gnizes this.
We hope this letter and the attached report respond to your
concerns.
Sincerely yours,
PRIOR LAKE-SPRING LAKE WATERSHED
DISTRICT? O
BY r
JAMES M. i.AABS, Acting President
Board of Managers
WSD:dc
Attachment
/3-.fz-
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Shakopee
Page 2
May 13, 1987
resulting erosion, and to allow the channel banks to stabilize.
To the extent these represent changes to the original plans and
specifications of the project, the watershed District has adopted
them under its conclusive design authority in Section 3 . 02 of the
Joint Powers Agreement.
we wish to make it clear that, contrary to the view expressed
by Mr. Ashfeld in a March 5, 1987 memorandum to John Anderson,
the inspection and approval authority for the outlet project
rests entirely with the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources . Under the Joint Powers Agreement, Shakopee' s inspec-
tion and approval authority does not extend to the project
completion but is limited to evaluation of channel capacity and
unimpeded flow of water at times when the Watershed District pro-
poses to open the outlet and release water from Prior Lake. we
have worked closely with the Department of Natural Resourc
throughout the project and have received its approval to operate
the outlet and make the necessary design changes.
It is and has been the intention of this Watershed District,
since the inception of the outlet project, to cooperate with the
City of Shakopee and all other affected agencies in creating a
project that benefits all concerned. Ultimately, however, the
watershed District must have control over the design and imple-
mentation of the project, subject to approval of the permitting
authority, which is the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources . The Joint Powers Agreement recognizes this.
we hone this letter and the attached report respond to your
concerns .
Sincerely i,ours,
PRIOR LAKE-SPRING LAKE WATERSHED
DISTRICT? ` o
BY r
JAM=S M. LAABS, Acting President
Board of Managers
WSD:dc
Attachment
HISTORY OF IMPROVEMENTS, REPAIRS AND
MAINTENANCE OF THE OUTLET CHANNEL
WITHIN THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
1982-1983
The original Outlet Project, WD76-4, made over $103,000 in improvements along
the channel within the City of Shakopee. These improvements included debris
removal along the entire channel , upgrading of undersized culverts, providing
additional protection around all structures and at critical areas, reshaping of
the channel to increase capacity and seeding of all disturbed areas.
1984
Record-breaking precipitation during 1983 caused high lake levels which in turn
required operation of the outlet before the seeding had established itself.
Over $83,900 in repairs and maintenance was completed on the outlet channel
within Shakopee under the Outlet Repair Project WD76-4R84. The properties where
work was completed included Reed, Hanson, Scottland, Kawasaki and Shiely. The
work included culvert installation, channel excavation and regrading, riprap
protection around structures and seeding and mulching.
1985
Outlet Repair Project, WD83-2R85, made about $35,100 in repairs to the channel
through the Melby, Muhlenhart, Reed, Lucast and Shutrop properties during 1985.
This work included regrading and straightening of the channel and sediment
removal .
1986
During 1986, about $13,500 in channel maintenance were completed on the Hanson
property under Outlet Repair Project WD76-4M85. The work included culvert
installation and repair, sediment removal and riprap protection around
structures and the channel bend. Two rockfilled weirs were also placed in the
channel south of County Road 16.
13 _a�
1987
Outlet Repair Project WD76-4M85 s e ended by $5,000 in order to place seven
more rock-filled weirs. The weir re placed in channel south of County Road 16
on the Muhlenh art and Melby pr perties.
� s �
1987
Outlet Repair Project WD76-4M85 was extended by $5,000 in order to place seven
more rock-filled weirs. The weirs were placed in channel south of County Road 16
on the Muhlenhart and Melby properties.
OUTLET CHANNEL MAINTENANCE PLAN /3-A7—
FOR
3-A7—
FOR 1988 AND BEYOND
Our maintenance plan for the future is to:
1. Follow up on maintenance recommendations that result from periodic
inspections of conditions along the outlet channel. This work will be
completed on an as needed basis dependent upon the availability of funding.
2. Install six to ten rock-filled weirs through the Muhlenhart, Reed and Lucast
properties. This will complete the erosion control work along the critical
channel section from the Shakopee-Prior Lake boundary to the Hanson
property. Estimates of cost range from $6,000 to $12,000.
3. Remove sediment from the channel through the Hanson property and regrade the
bank slopes. Estimates of cost range from $5,000 to $10,000.
4. Regrade channel banks in Melby, Muhlenhart and Reed properties and seed.
Estimates of cost range from $5,000 to $10,000.
5. Install diversion structure gate in diversion structure. Cost estimates
range from $1,000 to $2,000 depending on who does the work.
SUMMARY
1982-1987
Total expenditures of District funds over the last six years for drainageway
improvements through the City of Shakopee total $240,500. Future maintenance
will be on an as needed basis except for those items noted. Future maintenance
costs that are known range from a total of $17,000 to $34,000.
r-'
6
.. Y/ �DfL..2... � _ '' 1• '� c9 " . r r�:."fir i-- .:;, `"` 7 .".` � f .
V
- ' • C _ '
ji
oi-
r 4
f4
,� ,..-e•,- �,y ; �q , . of ••
• V
Is
.ate' h t,:� ;. i .`. J, " '� J •� �� ST
. L ti•
_ a -
�'
bt ` t b .
O � ��� �n✓���t�`.Wr .I M aL•..�.• � •`.... .fit
Am
.......__ f'� Cbz''' '•b. k: : _ � �� - -�
47
:._.:..• . ., �• 1985
- I. � -1986 a •. . � a .;
tv
IS�Fo �C +._ __ FYI i .`f?,.• )J�,( v I_�•. f
4 vt l
_ - ! f s
IS
42
X11 •• o ,
SAVA
,,f"•� .l ! \ t .�„' yr
r
I: ��' �r i'• �1- C+3Y 'd amu. 111111 '.) ' i f���
np �L a r1)�y� '• Y r'� � r�i.k
MEMO
TO: File
FROM: Allan Kremer
DATE: 2/2/87
RE: Outlet Channel Inspection
On January 28, I met with Ken Ashfeld, Shakopee City Engineer, and Mike Mueller,
DNR Hydrologist, for the purpose of inspecting the outlet channel within the
City of Shakopee. _
We began our inspection tour at the outlet to Blue Lake. The channel from the
Hennepin County Trail crossing to Blue Lake was heavily eroded in certain
sections with some deadfalls. The 36" RCP Hennepin County Trail crossing has
recently been improved with rip-rap on the upstream and downstream faces and
also across the top.
The outlet channel between the Hennepin County crossing and the 36" CMP W. Kopp
culvert was heavily eroded in the 400 feet directly downstream of the Kopp
culvert. The rest of the channel was only slightly eroded. The Kopp culvert
installation appeared to be in good shape with no evidence that the crossing
had been overtopped since it had been improved. Ken Ashfeld reported that he
had observed water backed up at the culvert during periods of high flow.
The channel from the Kopp culvert to the Highway 101 crossing was in good shape
with no signs of erosion, vegetative growth was very good on both banks. The
Highway 101 crossing appeared to be clear and unobstructed.
The stretch of channel from Highway 101 to the railroad crossing was clogged
with deadfall and floatables. The channel banks were heavily eroded especially
on the outside of channel bends with heavy deposition occuring on the inside of
13 -Q-'
the bends. The channel banks through this stretch show evidence of deposition
of suspended solids originating from the outfall from the Shiely pumping
operation. The railroad crossing does not appear to be obstructed although the
deadfall and deposition in the channel both upstream and downstream have
diminished its capacity.
The channel between the railroad crossing and the Shiely cu vert is moderately
eroded and heavily overgrown. The Shiely culvert is in go d shape. The outfall
for the Shiely Quarry is just upstr m of the Shiely Cros ing.
The channel upstream of the outfall t the beginning o the improved section is
slightly to moderately eroded with so deadfalls in he channel .
Shiely has begun the construction of a n outfal into the channel at a
location approximately 1,000 feet upstream of t e present location. Preliminary
work includes excavation of the outfall into he main channel and lining with
rip-rap. The channel section between the t o tfall locationsismoderately
eroded in certain areas. Some slope fail a is o curing at locations where
there are high banks along channel and opes are g ater than 3:1. Vegetation
growth is good but not enough to preve t the slope fa lure from occurring. One
section of failure was about 200 to 0 feet in length. The new outfall is
located iimnedi ately downstream of th northernmost check dam. This check dam
appears to be in good shape. Siltation is occuring upstream of the dam which
consequently flattens the channel slope and slows the velocity in the channel .
Between the northernmost and middle check dam, the channel is eroded in areas of
high overbank with some sections of 50 to 100 feet in length experiencing slope
failure. The vegetative cover is good but was not established well enough
13 �
the bends. The channel banks through this stretch show evidence of deposition
of suspended solids originating from the outfall from the Shiely pumping
operation. The railroad crossing does not appear to be obstructed although the
deadfall and deposition in the channel both upstream and downstream have
diminished its capacity.
The channel between the railroad crossing and the Shiely culvert is moderately
eroded and heavily overgrown. The Shiely culvert is in goad shape. The outfall
for the Shiely Quarry is just upstream of the Shiely Crossing.
The channel upstream of the outfall to the beginning of the improved section is
slightly to moderately eroded with some deadfalls in the channel .
Shiely has begun the construction of a new outfall into the channel at a
location approximately 1,000 feet upstream of the present location. Preliminary
work includes excavation of the outfall into the main channel and lining with °
rip-rap. The channel section between the two outfall locations is moderately
eroded in certain areas. Some slope failure is occuring at locations where
there are high banks along channel and slopes are greater than 3:1. Vegetation
growth is good but not enough to prevent the slope failure from occurring, One
section of failure was about 200 to 250 feet in length. The new outfall is
located immediately downstream of the northernmost check dam. This check dam
appears to be in good shape. Siltation is occuring upstream of the dam which
consequently flattens the channel slope and slows the velocity in the channel .
Between the northernmost and middle check dam, the channel is eroded in areas of
high overbank with some sections of 50 to 100 feet in length experiencing slope
failure. The vegetative cover is good but was not established well enough
13 .�
to prevent the failure. The middle check dam, which is immediately downstream
of a large, low, swampy area, has washed out along its west side. This wash out
should be repaired before Spring runoff occurs.
The channel between the middle and south check dam is slightly eroded with good
vegetative cover on both banks. The area the channel passes through is low and
swampy with a great deal of flood storage capacity. The southernmost check dam
has not washed out around the ends but may have washed out underneath the center
section. There is no deposition of sediments upstream of the check dam.
From the south check dam to the Dean Lake Crossing the channel is very slightly
eroded with good vegetative cover along both banks. There does not appear to be
any serious erosion at the two bends the channel makes directly downstream of
the Dean Lake Crossing. The crossing appears in reasonable shape but the banks
immediately downstream are in need of plant growth for stability. Someone has
dumped a pile of broken concrete curbing on the roadway next to the crossing.
The channel from the Dean Lake crossing to Dean Lake is natural and unimproved.
There are numerous beaver dams along this stretch and a great deal of flood
storage capacity is available within this flat, broad expanse of wetland area.
A sand delta is forming at the inlet channel to Deans Lake. This may be
objectionable since Dean's Lake is so shallow. The extent of the delta was
difficult to assess due to the ice but would not appear to be greater than 200
feet out from the shoreline.
The channel from the inlet to Dean's Lake up to Terry Hansons is slightly
eroded. There is some deadfall in the 200 feet of channel just upstream of the
inlet to Deans lake. The rest of the channel has good vegetative cover on the
banks. The two culverts on the west side of the Hanson property are in good
shape although there is bank erosion on the downstream side.
/3
From the two culverts on the west edge of the Hanson property to the diversion
structure, the stream bed has meandered within the easement alternatively
eroding the bank down and filling the stream bed. In areas where the bank
has eroded back, the slopes are q ite severe and continued problems can be
expected. The overbanks within is area are high and steep and should be
terraced or sloped and regraded. The gate for the diversion structure is not in
place and the installation will equire placement of another culvert section to
accommodate the gate mechanism.
The banks along the channel fro the diversion structure to the field road
crossing on the Hanson property re severely eroded in some areas due to the
meandering of the stream bed. a slope of the banks in this area is not
excessive but the bank faces ne d to be regraded, the easement located and a
fence installed. The field roa crossing culverts may require more rip-rap
upstream and downstrea if the h rses continue to use this area for a watering
spot.
The channel from the field roa rossing to the eastern edge of the Hanson
property has silted in since the rk was completed this last year. The channel
bed will continue to fill in as 1 ng sediment continues to wash down from the
channel south of County Road 16. The ban s on the north side should have been
sloped during the 1986 channel cleaning proi ct. The banks on the southside
are fairly stable but very irregular. The inside of the corner where the
channel turns west into the Hanson property has silted in since it was dredged
out in 1986. The channel coming from County Road 16 to this corner has eroded
severely with numerous areas of bank failure. The vegetative cover in this area
is quite good but not enough to prevent the stream from undermining the peat
like surface material . This stretch of channel will benefit greatly from the
I3 �
From the two culverts on the west edge of the Hanson property to the diversion
structure, the stream bed has meandered within the easement alternatively
eroding the bank down and filling in the stream bed. In areas where the bank
has eroded back, the slopes are quite severe and continued problems can be
expected. The overbanks within this area are high and steep and should be
terraced or sloped and regraded. The gate for the diversion structure is not in
place and the installation will require placement of another culvert section to
accommodate the gate mechanism.
The banks along the channel from the diversion structure to the field road
crossing on the Hanson property are severely eroded in some areas due to the
meandering of the stream bed. The slope of the banks in this area is not
excessive but the bank faces need to be regraded, the easement located and a
fence installed. The field road crossing culverts may require more rip-rap
upstream and downstream if the horses continue to use this area for a watering
spot.
The channel from the field road crossing to the eastern edge of the Hanson
property has silted in since the work was completed this last year. The channel
bed will continue to fill in as long as sediment continues to wash down from the
channel south of County Road 16. The banks on the north side should have been
sloped during the 1986 channel cleaning project. The banks on the south side
are fairly stable but very irregular. The inside of the corner where the
channel turns west into the Hanson property has silted in since it was dredged
out in 1986. The channel coming from County Road 16 to this corner has eroded
severely with numerous areas of bank failure. The vegetative cover in this area
is quite good but not enough to prevent the stream from undermining the peat
like surface material . This stretch of channel will benefit greatly from the
installation of a series of 6 to 8 rockfill weirs to flatten out the water
surface profile and allow some of the sediment transported down from above to
settle out. The County Road 16 crossing appears to be in good shape.
From County Road 16 upstream to the Shakopee City limits there has been
considerable bank erosion in the areas where the granular surface deposits
predominate. In areas where the peat surface deposits predominate, the channel
has cut down two to three feet within the main channel while leaving the banks
intact. In the area with the granular surface deposits, the channel has
meandered beyond the limits of the easement alternatively cutting and
depositing. The majority of the material depositing in the Hanson channel is
coming from this area. Sites for five rockfill weirs have been chosen and the
contractor is expected to start work shortly. Along with the installation of
the five rockfill weirs, the channel bank just downstream from the field road
crossing at the Shakopee City limits will receive a rip-rap treatment in an
effort to stabilize the erosion taking place. The two rockfill weirs within
this stretch of channel appear to be functioning as planned although the
northernmost weir has some washing out occurring and may require more rip-rap on
the west side. The lessons learned from these installations indicate the weirs
will function as anticipated if the center section is lower than the bank
sections, the bank sections are taken far enough out to the side in order to
prevent washing out around the sides and placing rip-rap in the channel
downstream of the weir to act as an energy dissipator.
I asked Ken Ashfeld to prepare something that will detail what needs to be done
in order to get Shakopee to grant final acceptance of the channel work in order
to then begin the three year warranty period. I suggested that maybe the City
could accept portions of the work as completed, begin the warranty period and
handle future problems as maintenance.
Issues brought up by KeXe were repair the washed out diversion
structure, cleaning of l from H' hway 101 to the railroad, removal of
the delta at the inlet ake, erracing of the banks through the
Hanson property, compleiversion structure, shaping thebanks through
the Hanson property anhe ero 'on problems to the south of County Road
16. Ken has said he wre a propo 1 to present to the Shakopee City
Council to complete thand begin the arranty in some form or another.
i
3
i
t
t
I
1
l
Issues brought up by Ken Ashfeld were repair of the washed out diversion
structure, cleaning of the channel from Highway 101 to the railroad, removal of
the delta at the inlet to Deans Lake, terracing of the banks through the
Hanson property, completion of the diversion structure, shaping the banks through
the Hanson property and curing the erosion problems to the south of County Road
16. Ken has said he would prepare a proposal to present to the Shakopee City
Council to complete the project and begin the warranty in some form or another.
i
i
i
1
lA
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator 3 g
FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Market Street Appraisals
DATE: May 28, 1987
INTRODUCTION:
At the public hearing for proposed improvements to Market Street,
Council directed staff to obtain proposals for appraising the
value of benefit to abutting properties as a result of a public
improvement to the street.
BACKGROUND:
I spoke with many appraisers in an attempt to obtain comparative
quotes. For the most part, the responses I received was that the
appraiser was either unqualified to properly appraise the benefit
or that it would be virtually impossible to obtain comparison
sales to accurately appraise the benefit. It seemed that it was
the consensus of those I spoke to that it would be difficult for
them to defend their appraisals- in court in this particular
instance. One appraiser did agree to do the work in what he
called a "preliminary value estimate" at a cost of $2,500.00. He
indicated that the document that would be provided would not be
adequate for court proceedings . To defend the preliminary
estimates in court would cost at least another $2,500 .00.
Lee Houser considered the situation and concurred with the
difficulty and inaccuracy of any findings as a result of
comparable sales. He suggested retaining several competent real
estate brokers to do a market analysis. In this case, basically
review what the asking price of what a house would be now and
what it would be if the street was improved. I spoke with four,
local, competent real estate agents requesting an analysis based
upon a marketing approach. All four agreed to provide this
information to the City at no charge.
If the value of the benefit is less than the estimated cost, as I
expect, i.ounaii oam DLTShtiE7 y�nY
1 . Discontinue consideration of the improvement project.
2. Continue consideration of the improvement project, file
assessments in the full amount and wait the 30 day
appeal period before awarding contracts.
3. Consider a City cost sharing, whereas, the abutting
property owners agree to an assessed amount and then
proceed with filing assessments prior to awarding
contracts.
131-
Market Street Appraisals
May 28, 1987
Page 2
4. Scale back the City ' s design criteria QC in the case of
Market Street , construct the street to state aid
standards and use scaled back design criteria in
calculating the local street cost. This option does
not provide much procedural guidance for future similar
projects.
ALTERNATIVES:
The purpose of the pXMarket
sed work is to etermine what is a fair
and legal assessment the benefit r ceived from improving a
street from a graverface to a c rb & gutter, bituminous
street. Although inate inform ion in this case may be
better than no inforo , it appe s the cost to complete the
appraisal work is mui er than I expected. An alternate
approach to the appal ethod preliminary value estimate) ,
would be the market aysis ppro ch. I expect this information
would be available fohe co ti ation of the public hearing on
July 7, 1987.
If Council wishes proce with the "preliminary value
estimate", Council shd "au or ze staff to obtain preliminary
value estimates for psed tree improvements to Market Street
from 2nd Avenue to 4tenu at a ost not to exceed $2,500 .00".
This work would noe vailabl for Council review until
approximately August 98 .RECOMMENDATION:
It is my opinion thatealtor' s market analysis approach would
provide adequate ination to assist staff and Council in
analyzing the futurf the Market Stre t Project as well as
future projects similo Market Street.
REQUESTED ACTION:
Move to direct staff to obtain realtor' s market analysis of the
value of the benefit of street improvements to Market Street
between 2nd Avenue & 4th Avenue .
KA/pmp
MARKET
/ 3
l,'
Market Street Appraisals
May 28, 1987
Page 2
4 . Scale back the City ' s design criteria U in the case of
Market Street, construct the street to state aid
standards and use scaled back design criteria in
calculating the local street cost. This option does
not provide much procedural guidance for future similar
projects.
ALTERNATIVES:
The purpose of the proposed work is to determine what is a fair
and legal assessment for the benefit received from improving a
street from a gravel surface to a curb & gutter, bituminous
street. Although inaccurate information in this case may be
better than no information, it appears the cost to complete the
appraisal work is much higher than I expected. An alternate
approach to the appraisal method (preliminary value estimate) ,
would be the market analysis approach. I expect this information
would be available for the continuation of the public hearing on
July 7 , 1987•
If Council wishes to proceed with the "preliminary value
estimate", Council should "authorize staff to obtain preliminary
value estimates for proposed street improvements to Market Street
from 2nd Avenue to 4th Avenue at a cost not to exceed $2,500 .00".
This work would not be available for Council review until
approximately August 4 , 1987.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is my opinion that a realtor' s market analysis approach would
provide adequate information to assist staff and Council in
analyzing the future of the Market Street Project as well as
future projects similar to Market Street.
REQUESTED ACTION:
Move to direct staff to obtain realtor' s market analysis of the
value of the benefit of street improvements to Market Street
between 2nd Avenue & 4th Avenue.
KA/pmp
MARKET
lay
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Endorsements for Vice President of the League of
Minnesota Cities
DATE: May 28, 1987
Introduction
The League of Minnesota Cities Nominating Committee will be
making its recommendation to the general League membership at the
League Conference beginning June 9th. The City has already
received one request for endorsement to the Vice President's
position from Jim Lacina, City Administrator of Woodbury.
Background
The Nominating Committee, chaired by Steve Kramer, has received
four applications for the position of League Vice President. The
Vice President becomes the President the following year. The
Nominating Committee has received applications from Jim Sibel of
St. Paul, Liz Witt of Mendota Heights, Bob Beinke of New Brighton
and Jim Lacina of Woodbury.
The City of Shakopee can refrain from endorsing any candidate, it
could endorse the candidate it feels would serve all League
cities the best, or the candidate that might serve suburban
cities the best. It is my experience that the League President
is forced into the roll of "statesmen" and is therefore generally
-------Unable to reflect any parochial interests. In speaking with the
Mayor he has noted some exceptions to this general rule.
Alternatives
1. The City can take the position of not endorsing any
particular candidate. This is the City's standing policy
for appointments to regional boards and commissions.
2. The City can support a particular candidate. This
alternative should be selected if the Council feels strongly
about the desirability of having one of the four candidates
serve as League President.
Recommendation
I recommend alternative No. 1 unless, after discussion by the
full Council, it is determined that one particular candidate is
much stronger that the other three.
Action Requested
Receive and file the request from Jim Lacina seeking support for
his nomination as Vice President of the League of Minnesota
Cities without .taking any specific action, or direct the
-
appropriate City officials to send a letter supporting the
nomination of one of the four candidates.
MUNICIPAL BUILDING
2100 Radio Drive • Woodbury. Minnesota55125 p
/ 7335972 _ -�-
L(/ OODBURY / 3
May 22, 1987 �ECEIVE�
John K. Anderson City Adm. MAY 27 196
City of Shakopee
129 East 1st Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55319 G1TY pF cµPK�PEc
Dear Mr. Anderson:
I am taking this opportunity to info nn you o my intent to seek the nomination
for Vice President of the League of•,Minneso a Cities at the upcoming
conference in Rochester. Irealize lthat s veral existing board members have
indicated an interest in seeking the posi ion. I believe, however, that I am
the best qualified based on my backgr un of proven leadership and partici-
pation. The League of Cities will be cing many tough issues over the next
two year period. The two principal i es will be legislative concerns
regarding revenue and, membership a pa ticipation. Over the tern of my
participation as a board member I ave st ngly supported an equitable
legislation program when dealing with city eve nue. I have also taken a very
keen interest in serving the needs of the gr terstate community as well as
the metropolitan community.
I would appreciate it if you would send a lette of support for my candidacy
to the Vice President's position to Steve Cramer Chair of the Nominating
Committee, % League of Minnesota Cities, 183 Uni rsity Avenue East, St. Paul ,
Minnesota 55101. Thanks for your anticipated ass stance and support in this
venture and I hope to see you at the conference.
Cordi al ly,
mes V. Lacina
ity Administrator
ej 1
e14 4
�j C✓% MUNICIPAL BUILDING
2100 Radio Drive • Woodbury,Minnesota SS125
/ , ^'�1� 739-5972
May 22, 1987 FIEC+�IVED
John K. Anderson City Adm. VAI 27 �gl
City of ShakopeeKOpgEr
129 EastAvenue
Shakopee,lst Minnesota 55379 CIfY OF SNA
Dear Mr. Anderson: _
I am taking this opportunity to inform you of my intent to seek the nomination
for Vice President of the League of Minnesota Cities at the upcoming
conference in Rochester. I realize that several existing board members have
indicated an interest in seeking the position. I believe, however, that I am
the best qualified based on my background of proven leadership and partici-
pation. The League of Cities will be facing many tough issues over the next
two year period. The two principal issues will be legislative concerns
regarding revenue and, membership and participation. Over the term of niy
participation as a board member I have strongly supported an equitable
legislation program when dealing with city revenue. I have also taken a very
keen interest in serving the needs of the greater state community as well as
the metropolitan community.
I would appreciate it if you would send a letter of support for my candidacy
to the Vice President's position to Steve Cramer, Chair of the Nominating
Committee, % League of Minnesota Cities, 183 University Avenue East, St. Paul ,
Minnesota 55101. Thanks for your anticipated assistance and support in this
venture and I hope to see you at the conference.
Cordially,
mes V. Loci na
ity Administrator
ejl
�3h
MEMO: JOHN ANDERSON
FROM: JIM KARKANEN
SUBJECT: PARK-INJURY
DATE: MAY 27TH, 1987
INTRODUCTION:
One of our park keepers injured himself several weeks ago at
Memorial Park while loading trash containers into our garbage
truck. This memo addresses possible alternatives regarding the
collection of trash/garbage in our Park system.
BACKGROUND:
Several years ago, we purchased a used trash
collector/compactor for $1500 from village Sanitation, which we
installed on an older one ton truck chassis. This enabled us to
bring the trash collector to the containers, rather than bring
the barrels to a dumpster, and handle them several times in the
process. This method has saved us many manhours in the Park
system while performing a necessary task. Because many of these
parks are being used more than ever, more trash is being
generated, and these containers are usually quite full.
Because of our usual shortage of help, especially this time
of year, it is, many times, necessary to have only one Park
keeper available to collect the trash and refuse in the Park
system, as all of the other Park keepers are busy elsewhere with
other duties.
Although it is customary to try to send 2 people out on the
trash collecting detail, it is not unusual to have only one
person available because of the heavy workload and obvious lack
of personnel available. There are no part time workers readily
available at this time of year, because most of the workers which
we would normally employ for this type of work are still in
school . Most schools are still in session, and hopefully, we
will obtain some part timers for the summer season. When the
parks are being used as heavily as they are this time of year,
plus the fact that we had an unusually early and warm spring
season, we find that we have to schedule trash collection on
Fridays and Mondays in most park areas. We normally don't have
to resort to this scheduling until June, on a normal spring
season.
We plan to replace the truck mounted trash collector in
several more years. This will be scheduled in the 5 year Capital
Equipment Program, and the replacement vehicle, hopefully, will
have a much lower hopper so the barrel and containers won' t have
to be lifted as high off the ground as they do with our current
model .
We have also looked for a lighter, and possibly, a smaller
trash container for our park system.
13h
We currently have a variety of 55 gallon, 30 gallon, and 20
gallon container barrels. Some of the barrels are of a light
gauge metal, while others are of a more heavy duty material, but
most of our barrels are of the variety that we could scavenge
through the years. We have found that we can not use a plastic
or fiberglass container because of hot coals, fires, etc. We
have checked with several firms who handle trash containers that
are used exclusively in park systems, and we find that they cost
between $75 to $100 to replace. A lighter gauge metal container
(barrel) can be installed in the system for about $10 each. We
would probably be thinking of replacing about 50 to 75
containers, if we were to replace the heavier containers with a
lighter gauge product that could be handled a little easier. We
have already told our employees to not try to do it all by
themselves, that we should wait until we can place at least 2
people on this detail.
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Find more help in the Public Works Dept. Also, insist
that the crew members not try to lift the heavy barrels by
themselves .
2. Install smaller and thinner gauged metal container
barrels. This would require a larger inventory of containers in
the park system. Remembering, however, that too many barrels
detract from the park aesthetics.
3. Install commercial park containers that would blend in
with the park area without detracting from the park beauty.
4. Acquire a more updated trash compactor that would have a
lower hopper opening so the barrels wouldn't have to be lifted so
high to empty into the truck.
5. Contract the garbage collecting. The disadvantage to
this proposal would be that when our crews are doing this detail ,
they also clean up, repair equipment, or at least report
potential problems that they might observe. You couldn't expect
a private hauler to watch for these things, so a crew member
would still have to inspect the park areas for faults.
6. Install a mechanical side loader compactor system that
would load the containers into the vehicle by a hydraulically
driven mechanical arm. This system requires special plastic
containers, and the equipment is very expensive.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternatives #1 , #2, and #4.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Request the Public Works Dept. to consider installing
lighter and smaller trash receptacles in the City park system,
and plan to replace the trash collector through the Capital
Equipment Fund process.
/3 ,'
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
John K. Anderson, City Adm 4VII
RE: Termination of Probation for Receptionist/Typist
DATE: May 29, 1987
INTRODUCTION:
Pennie Schlecter has completed her three month extended probation.
BACKGROUND:
After discussing with Pennie her job performance and responsibilities,
job satisfaction, and career goals, it was mutually agreed that she would
submit a letter of resignation effective June 12, 1987. (See attached)
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1] Accept the resignation of Pennie Schlecter, Receptionist/Typist,
effective June 12, 1987.
21 Authorize advertising for the position of receptionist/typist.
jc
/ 3 +
May 29, 1987
Shakopee City Council
129 E. 1st Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Council Members,
Please accept my le ter of resignation submitted on May 29,
1987, and becoming effecti a on June 12, 1987.
Respectfully Yours,
Penne Schlechter
May 29, 1987
Shakopee City Council
129 E. 1st Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Council Members,
Please accept my letter of resignation submitted on May 29 ,
1987, and becoming effective on June 12, 1987 .
Respectfully Yours,
':�7 ti✓t.�J
Pennie Schlechter
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council / 2
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator c.J
RE: City of Shakopee Sergeants
DATE: May 22, 1987
Introduction
Several months ago the City was notified that the Police
Sergeants were interested in organizing a formal collective
bargaining unit. The process is now being completed.
Background
The City, with the assistance of Cy Smythe of Labor Relations
Associates, has been negotiating with the sergeants over which
officers should be included in the bargaining unit. Both parties
have agreed that the Assistant Chief should not be a member.
Since there is an opening that leaves two sergeants in the
present bargaining unit. When the third sergeant' s position is
filled the officer will be automatically included in the
bargaining unit. The unit will be formally organized under
Teamsters Local No. 320 as are our Police Officers and Public
Works Employees.
The attached form requires that the City of Shakopee sign the
declaration of "Joint Stipulation of Appropriate Unit" with
regard to the City of Shakopee Police Sergeants.
Alternatives
1. Approve the Joint Stipulation of Appropriate Unit as
drafted. Cy Smythe and I have reviewed the stiuplation and
find it acceptable. It does not include the Assistant
Chief.
2. Propose an amendment to the Joint Stipulation as drafted.
There are few alternatives for Council to consider in
determining who should be part of the unit. The only
position questionable is that of the Assistant Chief and he
has been excluded. The only other area of concern might be
the language proposed on the stipulation. If Council has
concerns about the language we should discuss those before
executing the stipulation.
3. The City can require a very formal vote on the part of the
two Police Sergeants to determine through secret ballot
whether or not a majority support unionization at this time.
Neither Cy Smythe nor I feel there is any value in requiring
this step.
Recommendation
I recommend alternative No. 1 for the re sons listed above.
Action Requested
Authorize the appropriate City officia o execute the Joint
Stipulation of Appropriate Unitwi t Minnesota Teamsters
Public and Low Enforcement Employes' Union, Local No. 320
authorizing their representation f the P ice Sergeants in
Shakopee.
JKA/jms
( :3
Recommendation
I recommend alternative No. 1 for the reasons listed above.
Action Requested
Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the Joint
Stipulation of Appropriate Unit with the Minnesota Teamsters
Public and Low Enforcement Employees' Union, Local No. 320
authorizing their representation of the Police Sergeants in
Shakopee.
JKA/jms
j 3J
LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES. INC.
7501 Golden Valley Road RECEIVEm
Golden Valley,Minnewta 55427yyµI 1
6121546-1470 'a7�'1Y2 1987
May 21 , 1957 C'TyOF
SHAKOF[E
Mr. Robert J. Weisenburger
Business Representative
Teamsters, Local No. 320
3001 University Avenue SE
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414
RE: CITY OF SHAKOPEE SERGEANTS
Dear Mr. Weisenburger:
Enclosed is declaration of "Joint Stipulation of Appropriate Unit"
with regard to the City of Shakopee Police Sergeants. If you agree
with the Joint Stipulation please sign and return to me. I will sign
on behalf of the City Of Shakopee and forward to the Bureau of
Mediation Services for processing.
If you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
C. F. Smythe
Consultant to the.
City of Shakopee
CFS:hfc
Anderson cc:6j4hu
Encl.
/ 3J
JOINT STIPULATION OF APPROPRIATE UNIT
BY THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
AND
MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT
EMPLOYEES' UNION, LOCAL NO. 320
The City of Shakopee and Teamsters, Local No. 320 jointly stipulate
that the City of Shakopee Police S rgeants are an appropriate
bargaining unit comprised of two (2) Sergeants, and that the City of
Shakopee recognizes Teamsters, cal No. 320 as the exclusive
representative of :
"All employe s in t job classification of
Sergeant in a Cit of Shakopee Police Department
who are publi emp yees within the meaning of
Minn. Stat. 1 A.0 , Subd. 14, excluding all
non-essential a d confidential employees. "
The parties further stipu to that the Bureau of Mediation Services
shall determine represen ati based on a card check.
FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOP E: FOR TEAMSTERS, LOCAL NO. 320:
C. F. Smythe R. J. Weisenburger
Consultant Bus ness Representative
Dated this day of Dated this day of
1987. 1987.
/ 3J
JOINT STIPULATION OF APPROPRIATE UNIT
BY THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
AND
MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT
EMPLOYEES ' UNION, LOCAL NO. 320
The City of Shakopee and Teamsters, Local No. 320 jointly stipulate
that the City of Shakopee Police Sergeants are an appropriate
bargaining unit comprised of two (2) Sergeants, and that the City of
Shakopee recognizes Teamsters, Local No. 320 as the exclusive
representative of :
"All employees in the job classification of
Sergeant in the City of Shakopee Police Department
who are public employees within the meaning of
Minn. Stat. 179A.03, Subd. 14, excluding all
non-essential and confidential employees. "
The parties further stipulate that the Bureau of Mediation Services
shall determine representation based on a card check.
FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE: FOR TEAMSTERS, LOCAL NO. 320:
C. F. Smythe R. J. Weisenburger
Consultant Business Representative
Dated this day of Dated this day of
1987. 1987.
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administratorin,,,f
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Application for Taxicab License from Town Taxi
DATE: May 29, 1987
Introduction and Background
Application has been received from Town Taxi Co. Inc. of 2812
University Avenue S.E. , Minneapolis for a taxicab license.
The application was tabled at the May 19th Council meeting
because their certificate of insurance was not in order.
The certificate of insurance has been corrected and approved
by the City Attorney. The Chief of Police has okayed the
issuance of the license.
Alternatives
1. Approve.
2. Deny.
Recommended Action
1. Removed from the table the application for a Taxicab License
from Town Taxi.
2. Approve the application and grant a Taxicab License to Town
Taxi of 2812 University Avenue S.E. , Minneapolis , MN 55414.
JSC/jms
r3Q
MEMO TO: John R. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk/
I
RE: Application for Temporary 3.2 Beer License by
Shakopee Jaycees
DATE: May 29, 1987
Introduction
The Shakopee Jaycees have made application for a temporary 3 .2
beer license for June 13 and 14, July 25 and 26, and August 8 and
9, 1987.
Background
The City Attorney has reviewed the surety bond and insurance
exemption and they are in order.
Alternatives
1. Approve application.
2. Deny application.
Recommendation
Alternative No. 1, approve application.
Recommended Action
Approve the application and grant an On-Sale 3.2 beer license
to the Shakopee Jaycees at Tahpah Park Ballfields for June 13 and
14, July 25 and 26, and August 8 and 9, 1987 .
JSC/jms
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
i� J
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk l.;
RE: Application for Temporary 3.2 Beer License by
Church of St. Mark
DATE: May 29, 1987
Introduction
The Church of St. Mark has made application for a temporary 3.2
beer license for July 25 and 26, 1987.
Background
The City Attorney has reviewed the surety bond and insurance
exemption and they are in order.
Alternatives
1. Approve application.
2. Deny application.
Recommendation
Alternative No. 1, approve application.
Recommended Action
Approve the application and grant an On-Sale 3.2 beer license to
the Church of St.Mark at the 3rd Avenue and Scott Street Plaryground
for July 25 and 26, 1987.
JSC/jms
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator O 13A
FROM: Joseph P. Ries, Fire Chief ✓ �
y�
RE: Capital Equipment, Smoke Electors
DATE: May 28, 1987
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Ventilation is one of the most important functions to be done on
a fire scene, not only for the firefighter safety in removing
combustible gases to eliminate a backdraft, but also for the
removal of smoke to help in rescue and extinguishment of the
fire, and to keep the damage in the structure from smoke to a
minimal. One of the quickest ways to accomplish this is by
Mechanical Ventilation using Smoke Ejectors.
Smoke Ejector Fans come in steel frames in sizes 16 inches to 20
inches and move from 5200 to 9500 cubic feet of air per minute.
They also come with a explosion proof motor for usein
combustible atmosphere. These smoke ejectors are for replacement
of older models which have non-explosion proof motors and also
for equipment up grade. This would also include extension
tunnels and door hanger brackets.
Quotations received were:
P200SE 20" Smoke Elector
Baker Fire & Safety - $655. 00
Clarey Safety Equipment - $687.50
Conway Fire & Safety $625.00
P164SE 16" and Assy.
Baker Fire & Safety - $1, 925.00
Clarey Safety Equipment - $1, 875.00
Conway Fire & Safety - $2, 050 . 00
RECOMMENDATION AND ACTION REQUESTED;
1. Move to purchase P200SE 20" Smoke Ejector from Conway Fire &
Safety for $620. 00.
2. Move to purchase P164SE 16" and Assy. from Clarey Safety
Equipment for $1, 875. 00.
Total cost is $2, 500. 00. Capital Equipment budget for Smoke
Ejectors and Assy. was $2, 500. 00.
JPR/pss
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Malkerson Motors Use of City Property
DATE: May 28, 1987
Introduction
Malkerson Motors is using a lot owned by the City for new car storage.
The lot is next to the southwest corner of their building.
Backeround
The City started receiving tax statementsfor this lot because the
assessor realized that the City owned the lot but that Malkerson's was using
the lot for private benefit. The City billed Malkerson's for taxes payable
last year and they paid that bill. The City Attorney attempted to arrange a
sale to Malkerson's but they did not respond further after a price was
suggested.
A bill for taxes payable in 1987 plus storm drainage bills for the lot
plus $500 rent was sent to Malkerson's in March. The bill is not paid after
two additional follow-up notices.
The - City Attorney has suggested that the City fence the lot to deny
Malkerson's use of the lot and thereby return it to tax exempt status for
future taxing years. Alternatively, it may induce Malkerson's to deal on
buying the lot or to pay the bill for taxes and rent.
Alternatives
1. Do nothing and the City is not reimbursed for the taxes.
2. Fence in the lot.
3. Take Malkerson's to court.
4. Do not pay the taxes in future years and forfeit the lot.
Recommendation
Alternative number two.
Action requested
Move to direct the Engineering Dept to mark the lot and Public Works
department to fence in the parcel within 30 days.
1310
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Surplus property
DATE: May 28, 1987
Introduction
Council need to declare property surplus to enable staff to dispose of
uneeded items of equipment.
Background
The following vehicles have been replaced. Request Council declare them
surplus so that they may be sold at auction.
1979 Chev Malibu 9337
1960 Ford van 45432
1970 Chev truck 33644
1980 Jeep 54159
1982 Chev Malibu 58576
1984 Ford LTD 55292
1984 Ford LTD 55289
Action Reauested
Move to declare the following vehicles surplus and to be sold at auction;
1979 Malibu, 1982 Malibu, 2 - 1984 LTD, 1980 Jeep, 1970 Chev truck, 1960 Ford
van.
YYY N W - O NU qP tl d n n
000 t d i U t - i - - t p • 00 i i t Y S �
$ y
O <
O
m v
s
UNU U U U NP U UU NU U N m m
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ N\ \ \ m x
mNro m p ro nro ro roro ro n N ro
yyy J y y yy J JJ JJ J y y S
P0m P P PO P PO PO 0 0 T
yyy y y y y y JJ Jy y J J �
dr p Nro mN pn VV 44 bb 4
PtlPOPP yU 0yr PPY NU dp PP
pp y yOM dd M yd4 NU d
PMNW eO 40 MMe y ➢ d 'tb
OroNW 00 , O 000 00 yUp NNY O dd
' x O n inn P mP 44 m S
iii m c s as c ss o0
mmm z m a as r cc X T z
JJJ z J r mm r mA zz
Pm o aw
m
- mPw � as K yr zz m o a
n n n
00 r ~ Aa A
OPn _ a Ip0 P n
zzz z z a
nnn a zn n n J n
n n
a
y
A
A
aaT n m m ns P mm J� P P J -
o c o ao a mm am c v
00o z A c yy �� <m 9 T < 3
TTT T 9 yA r T9 r
mm. P 1�1 3 rT m 33 O N m w N
�T� x Am
z
o J J c P
0 - m
m � r
m y 2
'. N N p rm r pro r N e y
UPd Y d d WW Y dN mn Y ro r O
UYr p y ! m rP rr r tl r
y_ ro-
�si
P be yo
r 0 0 mJ Y
am y m
b P u T I
o bro
I
m
• y '
3
m T
m a
> A '
• i � • ' f i _ i A
1 1 I I 1 1 ^
Y U Y V Y U Y V V I
1 I 1 1 I
W Q �
6 W
L
F i
0
O
F N M1
I 6 n N N NNN M N
o i . m Fhh M
n N V PPO P
1 I 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1
1 I F .
O v v P < T P v
V 1 1 1 1 I - 111 ' 1 I I 1 1
6 eh o
m b
m m
F J J
K N W N h
Q W N 6 • / b N � W
w L n J L
J J d W J mmm J W
6 > 6 hFF! 6 > V
w w h m ¢ m F m
N
m
W O W F
F 6
O Z J W W
6 6 2
F F J W M
Z W 2 m C
V W J LL 3 Y
K d i 6 6 6 2
h 6 J
O Y C Y m m
Z 6 K J L
W x I m O O J p
W Z S 6 6
N Q Y Z F V V V W 6
L O W 6 0J00J OJ J Z 6 N
Y Y Y O J JK L Z Z
00 NN i FF NN nPMN • i i nn
MM PPHN nM F P • NN
NN nn PPvn M1M1 Fh nn 00 Fh
NN �� YP �� MM NN NN NN
Z
O
L
a
w
F M1 F F h Fhh h F F M1 F
m m m 0 0 000 0 0 O 0 0
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
F F M1 M1 FFF F 1-
N N N N NNN N N m N
m N N N N N NNN N N N
G o 0 0 0 0 000 0 o O O O
LL O
O
h O
h Z
V Y N O N
0
F N N N n IP'1
P cV P f P P i P PPP " P P r f P ♦ -
/ 34
a N m N N N m m m m m
Y Y Y Y V y Y U V U
U V U V
W 1 I 1 I 1 I I
V
< N
1 W
L I
r s
N O F
1 N � N ♦P ♦ N
n N NNN
N F n PPP . N o
O N N P N NNn . N n
1 1r . n n I
1 u I o
J N N P ♦ ♦ PPn ♦ n P P P
m N
0 0
K L 2 N
G � J
LL 6 O j
r J J O F N W W W J K J F
N N W 666 N r 0 N J
K
W
F
N
V
K O = J W =
U 6 w 6 V
W F J W
(Ij W J LL a Q I
2 6 Q Y 6 K J L
L O W Q 000 O J Z Q m
Y Y Y O J JJJ J K L
♦ y nn • uN oo PP�N nn • • ♦ 4 NN
. NN �� t'ih PY1 r rr nl'1 0m Fh
WN � � 4♦ pN ^P nl'1 NN NN NN
J
O_
6
IY r � 0 00r m 0 r m
p \ r F
Q N N NNN N � N
N F o N NON N o o e o
Q O o 0 oe
> O
F 2
N N NN n
y y yy y y y y J y S O
m o 0 J N N P W m J
p � o • bb • P ♦ � i y i p e W e y W ♦ b F n
S y
O y
O '
O m
D
N N N NN N N N N N N N N W
J J J NJ y y J J y J y F
y J J yJ J y J y J J y T
D
O i
YY 2
NN
NN 00 P+ 0 NN
Jy NN o0 NON pm oa oo NN PP oa NN 00 ,
m n a cc < n c a c ? m
D A 9 W W v A 9 O
3 O r Y1 O r m A •I <
m b
w m m W D p9 O 9 y T D
r 9 0r F N S n O
r
O
w c w m n m A
m m ii a r
Z r A rw < r H x D m
M.
n < ns m a m n
s
O 2 Z m A
m n O m p
w
y
m
m .. A
9 V ^ y D r
N v D T
3 3 m PP v T m N N N N v w
D y W N 9
< < y
2 2 oO
y y 0m y
y
Z
D
a a + + W
1'o io N Y+u u au Y r'o w In ro u y
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 P
p n
N p I
9 1
J I
O N
0 �
f y
3 �
m a
a n
w P
> m
n n n n n n n n -
F
Y
N
w 1
u
w c .
u m
s W
6 W
L
0
N O
� d
N n
Y1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 .,
Y;
6 O O
0J
r r
z.. r r zrJ
O 6 1 WZ
F WLU
_ O_ 6 Q 6 KW DrL
W LL F WZ NhW
W J O W J J 266000
r 6 J O J J O 0 wW6'PPF
W
W I
W
F
W
u o 0
W V V L
w J 6
O W U m 6 2 6
Y W W Z O V p r J JJJJJJ
V W F L w Q tt66t6
W i K W J J W rr 0
0
00
000000
V K W a U O W Z rrrrFF
O < K Z Y W F _ D L J �PmMnn
2 W 0 2 F Q W W W q e'_etlM1
W W 6 W 0 LL J 6 000000 J
> m W W 6 O 6 222222 Q
F .. W r . p L Y O OJJOJO r
L 2 ^ LL t F 6 m W LLLLLLLL4LL O
• FF Pp NN Na • n' • ♦P FNnNNVI
Pf FF n 0 NF Nh�
nM bW 00 D0 aN 0
h �M1 Nd �� NN e0 Pw Nm Wa pOPPOoa 0
z n m
J Nn N
L
6
W
W F h F F F M1 F F h
6 O D 0 0 0 D 0 m m D
YQ M1F F F F F
N b N b N N N N h
m a e e o 0 o e o o e \
LL O O
O
Y O
r Z
h W 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0
V M1 h P F F
- - - 13-P
P m
Y
V
W 1
Y
W 6 ,
< m .
6 W
r a
m
1
d o
i t Y
n m Y
N n I
n n .
1 1 1 1 O 1 O O O 1
J '. a n
o P P v e P P P p v P
Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
h h
K b m m 6 LL L6K
O F O m e r � V Q^ r•=0
WS bFK
F J O W J O W 6 J 26< 000
r• W 1 O W 6 O 0 m 6 W UFS•-gym
W
W
F
0
V U U L
w O m V 6 Z 6
V W m z O Y J J JJJJJJ
W m S m t 666166 "
W O 6 K J J W 000000
S L W T O O 30 0 0
00
000
m Z 000000
o m J u < u F x e
000000 J
> 6 W W m W 6 O O 6 Q 222222 6
6 0 . W 0 0 U Y ¢ JJJJJJ 0
L 2 K LL 6 < U LLLLLLLLLLLL O
V U LL J m L 6 U J > F
i Fr PP mm db ' nn + • P rNOWNn
PP FF AA m0 WFOmF_ A
mNN0 eO __ OO NN
F V NN wP Nm NN
Z NA m
O
L
6
W r M1 F 0 0 F F F 0
o m 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 1\- F F h r F M1N M1
N w N w w b N N
U Wa
e e\ o O o O O o O o
LL O
O
T O
F S
W 0 0 0
X0000 m m m m m m mmm m m oloo 0 rn m $ g -
r
F'FFF F F F F F F tF'F' W W y� W W W F F' R
N N N N �O bm d Y r O m m ul b " S
www W N N N W N WWW N W N �O r Y N
0 9
0 0 0 0 0 N W ,1 N r Y m No H Y f. yl 00
O N
��� NS8S8o80000 oo00
Nrrr o 0 0
r r w F0 0 0 0 0 0 000 O O O 00 O F O
m m r N 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 O p p 00 O N O
mmmo 0000 m m m m m m mmm m m 0 Oo 0 m m 0
F r N r c r r r r
1 1 1 1 O r r r r
hm] bpt Y OH0 0 0 0 r0 r0 Y0 r0 0r r0 000
00 YO rp 0r 0r 0r rO Or rP
rrrr r rrYr rp 0 000Om o 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0
w
�y �
n � me H m
M0 w R
£ r 9
� W
Y N r W
3
HM C
z0
P H 0 �
O 3
C
a Y
WW
Ut m r ut Y
O m W m ut F W w ut O p 0 m m O\ W O
i+ F Fri W ut ut Y O w Off\ vt vt O\ m F �
9
�p m D\N F O
O O O O O O
N O o O �1 O 00 N 00 O W N f0]
FFFN ut O\m�0
O
C
2
H
N
a aaa 0
r m m m N m m m m m O 3 3 W K
O• 3 3 3 3 3 µ 3 3 3 O O P. m m m S 3 m D
w mow N O > K H o n a X O N n
Y ommF
oom�
�+ N
ro
r
NNNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O
w w W W W W W w W w W W w W W w w W W W W T'
D\ 01 O� �Op\ O� O� O� Oma M O m m m O\ M O m
NNNN O b O� m m N m Ym O �O m
O
a N
p Y O O = = Y O = LTJ N D
m m W o O o O o O .O
rr a CA tli M 3 CF 7 OV < N 1+ 3 �J O. O
0 0 z 3 z E r m �r m o >•
w 09 O 0 0 K r m r N �
ry m Y a r m N O
pt pt pl m O W (P 4 m m
ry ry p m 0 m a C
b O
< < m O
m £ O
b •T
3
ut m Y Ut Y W Y ut ut m �O W
�p �O
0O:0O N m O O O N m
F 0 0 0 '0' O ut w O S N O S m N
/30
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John R. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Vacation of Austin Street
DATE: May 29, 1987
Introduction
The Shakopee City Council, at its regular May 19, 1987 meeting,
received the attached letter from William Platto, Platto and
Associates, dated May 18, 1987. The letter outlined the proposed
agreement between the City of Shakopee, Al DuBois and James Hauer
for the vacation of Austin Street. At that meeting Council
concurred with the basic proposal outlined in Mr. Platto's letter
and directed staff to finalize arrangements.
Final Agreement
The City, after reviewing the proposal, determined that the
vacation could be re-engineered. The cost of the vacation of
Austin Street has been revised downward and now is estimated at
$4,957.00 (see attached spreadsheet dated May 27, 1987) .
In addition, the City discussed with the abutting property owners
the reservation of a trail easement to access the proposed Upper
Valley Trail. This item had not been discussed during earlier
negotiations, but has been included in the resolution. Mr. Hauer
has agreed to place the trail on that portion of the vacated
street which he will be acquiring from Al DuBois. All
construction and maintenance costs for the trail will be the
responsibility of the City of Shakopee.
The City's cost for the vacation, based upon the May 27, 1987
spreadsheet will be items No. 1, 2, 5, 6, and 8 totaling
$2,206.00. The items to be paid for by Mr. James Hauer include
items No. 3, 4, 7, 9, and 13 totaling $2,601.00. Items 10, 11
and 12 totaling $150.00 will be allocated to the City or Mr.
Hauer by the Council meeting Tuesday evening.
Alternatives
1. The City can approve the proposed settlement for the cost of
vacating Austin Street as proposed. This particular
proposal includes a compromise arrangement between the three
parties involved, each of which benefits from the vacation.
2. The City Council can modify the proposed agreement.
3. The City Council can determine that it is not in the best
interest of the City of Shakopee to spend $2,206.00 to
vacate Austin Street.
31-Re )31-
Recommendation
commendation
The City Engineer and I recommend alternative No. 1 because the
City will enhance the abuttin properties and eliminate a street
that goes nowhere. T e el' ination of the street will reduce
maintenance costs and th p iential of any liability cost that
might arise should someo a injured on the uncompleted deadend
street.
Action Requested
Authorize the appropriate it officials to approve Resolution
No. 2733, A Resolution Vaca ing Austin Street South of Davis
Court, According to the P1 t of EJ 2nd Addition to the City of
Shakopee, Scott County, Minne ta, and spending $2,206.00 to
effectively close the str t and estore the area.
JKA/jms
i
)3 r
Recommendation
The City Engineer and I recommend alternative No. 1 because the
City will enhance the abutting properties and eliminate a street
that goes nowhere. The elimination of the street will reduce
maintenance costs and the potential of any liability cost that
might arise should someone be injured on the uncompleted deadend
street.
Action Requested
Authorize the appropriate City officials to approve Resolution
No. 2733 , A Resolution Vacating Austin Street South of Davis
Court, According to the Plat of JEJ 2nd Addition to the City of
Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota, and spending $2,206.00 to
effectively close the street and restore the area.
JRA/jms
/ 3e
RESOLUTION NO. 2733
A RESOLUTION VACATING AUSTIN STREET SOUTH OF DAVIS COURT,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF JEJ 2ND ADDITION TO THE CITY
OF SHAKOPEE, SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, it has been made to appear to the Shakopee City
Council that that part of Austin Street lying south of Davis
Court within the plat of JEJ 2nd Addition no longer serves any
public interest or use save and except for the installation and
maintenance of public utilities; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing to consider said vacation was held
in the Council Chambers of the City Hall in the City of Shakopee
at 8:15 p.m. on May 5, 1987; and
WHEREAS, two weeks' published notice has been given in the
Shakopee Valley News and posted notice has been given by posting
such notice on the bulletin board on the main floor of the Scott
County Courthouse, on the bulleting board in the Shakopee City
Hall and on the bulletin board at the First National Bank of
Shakopee; and
WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard on the matter were
heard at the public hearing in the Council Chambers in the City
of Shakopee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1. That it finds and determines that the vacation herein-
after described is in the public interest and serves no
further public need as a street,
2. That all that part of Austin Street lying south of
Davis Court lying within JEJ 2nd Addition, Scott
County, Minnesota be, and the same hereby is vacated.
3. That the City reserves, however, to the City of
Shakopee its licensees and franchise holders a
perpetual easement on, under and over the easterly 45
feet of said vacated street for utilities with the
right to install, maintain, repair, lay and relay the
utilities by the City, its franchisees and franchise
holders; as well as a perpetual easement for trail
access.
4. After the adoption of the Resolution, the City Clerk
shall file certified copies hereof with the County
Auditor and County Recorder of Scott County.
Resolution No. 2733
Page Two
Adopted in Adj . Reg. Session of the!Cit Council of the City
Pg Y
of Shakopee, Minnesota held this 19th,d'ay of May, 1987.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of , 1987.
City Attorney
13 /�
Resolution No. 2733
Page Two
Adopted in Adj. Reg. Session of the City Council of the City
of Shakopee, Minnesota held this 19th day of May, 1987.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1987.
City Attorney
Platto & Associates 131-
Attorneys
3rAttorneys at Law
218 Pine Street
P.O. Box 257
Chas Ra, Minnesota 55318
William 1. Platto Telephone
Nancy C. Platto May 18, 1987 612448-2005
Ms. Judith S. Cox
Clerk, City of Shakopee
Shakopee City Hall
Shakopee, MN 55379
RE: AUSTIN STREET VACATION
INTERESTED PARTIES:
1) ALBERT & LORRIE DU BOIS: Lot 34, Block 2, JEJ 2nd Addition
2) JAMES HAUER: Lot 5, Block 1, Hauers 2nd Addition
Dear Ms. Cox:
Pursuant to last week's joint meeting between Jon Anderson, Ken Ashfeld, and yourself
on behalf of the City and the above parties, I wish to advise you that the DuBois and
Mr. Hauer are in agreement as to the manner in which the above street vacation will
be mutually beneficial to all. The purpose of this letter is to outline the procedure
acceptable to the interested and adjoining landowners.
I understand that you have placed the matter on the agenda of the City Council meeting
scheduled for Tuesday, May 19, 1987. If you desire, both parties could attend to answer
any questions. As I advised you, I would like to formalize an agreement between the
DuBois and Mr. Hauer documenting the obligations between themselves arising out
of this matter. I anticipate that this will be signed today. If the agreement between
the parties causes any changes in the procedure setforth herein, I will notify you prior
to the time when you will submit the same to the council for their consideration.
To begin with, if the City agrees with the cost sharing arrangements associated with
the restoration work as hereafter setforth, I understand that the City will:
1. Vacate that part of Austin Street lying Southerly of a line running from
the Northeasterly corner of Lot 34, Block 2, JEJ 2nd Addition to the
Northwesterly corner of Lot 5,Block 1, Hauers 2nd Addition. The vacation
will be in accordance with Minn. Stat §412.851 on the council's own motion.
If you feel a joint petition by the adjoining land -owners is necessary,
please let me know.
2. The City's Resolution shall, in accordance with Minn. Stat. §160.29, define
the rights to be maintained by the City concerning the utility easement
rights presently existing in the portion of the street to be vacated. I
understand from conversations with city engineer, Ken Ashfeld that
the City will need to maintain utility easements for the existing fire
hydrant and water and sewer lines. Mr. Ashfeld believes that the entire
road to be vacated will necessarily be covered in the easement rights
with one exception. Mr. Ashfeld agrees that easement rights can be
31-
-2 -
released as to that part of the street to be vacated which lies Easterly
and adjacent to the existing Easterly line of the DuBois property and
which lies Westerly of a line drawn parallel within 10 feet Westerly of
the existing waterline and which also lies Southerly of a line drawn
at a right angle to the Easterly DuBois lot -line and 10 feet Southerly
of the existing fire hydrant. I believe the above description will enable
the proper language to be inserted in the Resolution.
For your reference, the Vacation Resolution in accordance with the above statute
Will, by law, establish Fee Title in Mr. & Mrs. DuBois subject to the easement rights
retained therein. In the agreement to be formalized between the DuBois and Mr. Hauer,
the DuBois will, thereafter, deed a portion of the vacated street subject to the easement
rights retained to Mr. Hauer which I assume Mr. Hauer will want consolidated with
Lot 5 as above described. If the City has any requirements to approve the Lot
consolidation please let me know. In return for the DuBois' conveyance of a portion
of the street to be vacated, Mr. Hauer is basic y agreeing to share the entire costs
of the restoration necessary with the City according to the allocation and procedure
hereafter setforth.
Concerning the restoration work and the cost allocation thereof, I refer your attention
to the planning memo with attachments forwarded by Ken Ashfedd, City Engineer,
to yourself and dated April 20, 1987. As above setforth, the costs indicated will be
born by the City and Mr. Hauep without any cost allocation to Mr. & Mrs. DuBois.
It is contemplated that Mr. Hauer will perform the restoration work as the general
contractor of the City, according to city plans and specifications and according to
- - -- �.fientar' �h3? d,� o�-SnufinitEo: r u1meisUnay'rfum aft Knadrson that tf a contract can " be accomplished by direct negotiation rather than through formal bids. Nevertheless,
if the City does require formal bids, I feel confident that Mr. Hauer's bid would be
acceptable, a fact which begome� evident in the foregoing comments.
I am attaching as EA1T A m understanding of the cost estimates which Mr. Hauer
' will agree to submit. a Exhibit a revision Mr. Ashfeld's attachment to his April 20,
1987 memo. As indi ted therein a additional cost has been added for the new curb
and gutter necessary which cost was mitted in Mr. Ashfeld's original estimates.
Mr. Hauer's proposal for sharing the otai cost estimate of $8,327.00 is basically by
allocating the costs to the City for work in the street area of the street lying
Northerly of the portion to be vacate i.e., the road costs necessary to dig up the
road, to repair and relocate the catch asins and to repair the road. The costs for
the work within the area of the street tobe vacated will be born by Mr. Hauer. The
actual cost allocations are proposed as follows:
13r
-2-
released as to that part of the street to be vacated which lies Easterly
and adjacent to the existing Easterly line of the DuBois property and
which lies Westerly of a line drawn parallel within 10 feet Westerly of
the existing water -line and which also lies Southerly of a line drawn
at a right angle to the Easterly DuBois lot -line and 10 feet Southerly
of the existing fire hydrant. I believe the above description will enable
the proper language to be inserted in the Resolution.
For your reference, the Vacation Resolution in accordance with the above statute
will, by law, establish Fee Title in Mr. & Mrs. DuBois subject to the easement rights
retained therein. In the agreement to be formalized between the DuBois and Mr. Hauer,
the DuBois will, thereafter, deed a portion of the vacated street subject to the easement
rights retained to Mr. Hauer which I assume Mr. Hauer will want consolidated with
Lot 5 as above described. If the City has any requirements to approve the Lot
consolidation please let me know. In return for the DuBois' conveyance of a portion
of the street to be vacated, Mr. Hauer is basically agreeing to share the entire costs
of the restoration necessary with the City according to the allocation and procedure
hereafter setforth.
Concerning the restoration work and the cost allocation thereof,I refer your attention
to the planning memo with attachments forwarded by Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer,
to yourself and dated Apr1120, 1987. As above setforth, the costs indicated will be
born by the City and Mr. Hauer without any cost allocation to Mr. & Mrs. DuBois.
It is contemplated that Mr. Hauer will perform the restoration work as the general
contractor of the City, according to city plans and specifications and according to
a formal bid to be submitted. I understand from Jon Anderson that the contract can
be accomplished by direct negotiation rather than through formal bids. Nevertheless,
if the City does require formal bids, I feel confident that Mr. Hauer's bid would be
acceptable, a fact which becomes evident in the foregoing comments.
I am attaching as EXHIBIT A my understanding of the cost estimates which Mr. Hauer
will agree to submit. The Exhibit is a revision Mr. Ashfeld's attachment to his April 20,
1987 memo. As indicated therein one additional cost has been added for the new curb
and gutter necessary; which cost was omitted in Mr. Ashfeld's original estimates.
Mr. Hauer's proposal for sharing the total cost estimate of $8,327.00 is basically by
allocating the costs to the City for all work in the street area of the street lying
Northerly of the portion to be vacated, i.e., the road costs necessary to dig up the
road, to repair and relocate the catch basins and to repair the road. The costs for
the work within the area of the street to be vacated will be born by Mr. Hauer. The
actual cost allocations are proposed as follows:
-3 -
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
1. Remove Catch Basins, and
2. Remove 12" RCP ............
5. Install C.P. Catch Basins -
6. 12" RCP ........................................
8. 2341 Bituminous Patching ...............
TOTAL Cost Estimate to the City
JAMES HAUER
ITEM
/3&
VAUSIUN1
$ 500.00
$ 1,200.00
$ 1,740.00
1,100.00
$ 4,540.00
AMOUNT
3. Remove Curb.............................................................. $ 837.50
4. Remove Pavement and Base ......................................... 1,057.50
7. CL-5........................................................................... 532.00
9. Restoration (Topsoil and Seed) ...................................... 800.00
10. Installation of New Curb and Gutter, estimated 70'
at $7.00 per foot ....................................................... 560.00
HAUER'S Cost Estimate ......................................... $ 3,787.00
TOTAL COST ESTIMATE .._.___.. .......... __.... _................. $ 8,327.00
The following comments concerning the above allocations are
necessary:
1. For Items Nos. 1 and 2, Mr. Hauer's bid will be firm, he will perform
the work and the City's cost will be fixed.
2. For Items Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10, Mr. Hauer will subcontract the work
out to third parties on bids. Any change from the cost estimate, whether
an increase or a decrease, will be adjusted so that each party benefits
or incurs 50% of the estimated and actual cost differential. The purpose
of this provision is to provide the incentive for Mr. Hauer as the general
contractor to receive the lowest bid possible.
! 3 f-
-4-
3. For Items Nos. 3, 4, d 9, Mr. Hauer will perform the work himself
and the cost to the Cit to be paid Mr. Hauer as general contractor,
will be fixed.
I believe the foregoing constitutes a information necessary for the City Council's
consideration of the matter. From m comments, I do not believe that the actual
agreement between Mr. & Mrs. DuBois 'and Mr. Hauer needs to be submitted to the
city. Please call me if you have any questions regarding the proposed procedure or
if you desire the parties to be available at the council meeting.
Very tru�y yours
a
Wi1Ham J. P at o
WJP:dms
cc: Al & Lorrie DuBois i
Jim Hauer
3 r-
-4-
3. For Items Nos. 3, 4, and 9, Mr. Hauer will perform the work himself
and the cost to the City, to be paid Mr. Hauer as general contractor,
will be fixed.
I believe the foregoing constitutes the information necessary for the City Council's
consideration of the matter. From my comments, I do not believe that the actual
agreement between Mr. do Mrs. DuBois and Mr. Hauer needs to be submitted to the
city. Please call me if you have any questions regarding the proposed procedure or
if you desire the parties to be available at the council meeting.
Very tru>ty you
William J. P et o
WJP:dms
cc: Al k Lorrie DuBois
Jim Hauer
/3t-
EXHHHT A
ITEM
UNITS
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
1.
Remove Catch Basins,
2 Ea.
2.
Remove 12" RCP
90 L.F.
$ 500.00
3.
Remove Curb
335 L.F.
$ 2,50
837.50
4.
Remove Pavement & Base
705 S.Y.
1.50
1,057.50
5.
Install C.P. Catch Basins
1 Ea.
1,200.00
1,200.00
6.
12" RCP
58 L.F.
30.00
1,740.00
7.
CL -5
76 Ton
7.00
532.00
8.
2341 Bituminous Patching
22 Ton
50.00
1,100.00
9.
Restoration (Topsoil & Seed)
0.2 Ac.
4,000.00
800.00
10.
Installation of New Curb & Gutter
80 Ft.
$7/foot
560.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST ...............................................
$8,327.00
AUSTIN STREET VACATION
9 Restoration
(Topsoil & Seed)
10 Install Bulkhead
11 R&R CB Casting m/MH
Casting
12 Adjust B.V. Box
13 Install Curb & Butter
/3 F
MAY 27, 1987
ITEM
UNITS
I Remove
Catch Basi
1
Ea.
2 Remove
12" RCP
8
L.F.
3 Remove
Curb
202
L.F.
4 Remove
Pavement & Base
500
S.Y.
5 Install
LP Catch Basin
EA.
6 12" RCP
N/A
7 Class 5
N/A Use Salvaged
Cl. 5
8 2341 Bit.
Patching
16
Tow
9 Restoration
(Topsoil & Seed)
10 Install Bulkhead
11 R&R CB Casting m/MH
Casting
12 Adjust B.V. Box
13 Install Curb & Butter
/3 F
MAY 27, 1987
00 $50.00 $800.00
07EA.
re $4,000.\By
00.00 $800.00
. 50.00 ity Forces
2 EA. $50. JW).tr�
78 L.F. $7.00 $4.79 $546.00
$4,807.00
ISO ^4
C. 0.
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
$150.90
$250.00
$150.00
$ .00
$6.00
$56.00
$2.50
$1.50
$505.00
$1.50
$1.50
$750.00
1,200.00
$700.00
$1,200.00
00 $50.00 $800.00
07EA.
re $4,000.\By
00.00 $800.00
. 50.00 ity Forces
2 EA. $50. JW).tr�
78 L.F. $7.00 $4.79 $546.00
$4,807.00
ISO ^4
AUSTIN STREET VACATION
/3 ~
MAY 27, 1987
ITEM
UNITS
1
Remove Catch Basins
i
Ea.
2
Remove 12' RCP
8
L.F
3
Remove Curb
202
L.F
4
Remove Pavement & Base
500
S.Y
5
Install LP Catch Basin
1
EA.
6
12' RCP N/A
7
Class 5 N/A Use Salvaged
Cl. 5
8
2341 Bit. Patching
16
TON
9
Restoration
/3 ~
MAY 27, 1987
$50.00
C. 0.
0.2
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
$150.00
$250.00
$150.00
$7.00
$6.00
$56.00
$2.50
$1.50
$505.00
$1.50
$1.50
$750.00
$1,200.00
$700.00
$1,200.00
$50.00
$50.00 $800.00
$4,000.00 $800.00
$50.00 rj O.C11
By City Forces
$50.00 �CO.e-e
$4.79 $546.00
$4,807.00
1$s
(Topsail & Seed)
0.2
Acre $4,000.00
10
Install Bulkhead
1
EA.
li
R&R CB Casting m/MH
1
EA.
Casting
12
Adjust B.V. Boz
2
EA.
13
Install Curb & Butter
78
L.F. $7.00
$50.00 $800.00
$4,000.00 $800.00
$50.00 rj O.C11
By City Forces
$50.00 �CO.e-e
$4.79 $546.00
$4,807.00
1$s
PAUSFTINSTIREET?�V'aCATION
MAY 27, 1987
ITEM
UNITS
I
Remove Catch Basins
I
Ea.
2
Remove 12" RCP
8
L.F
3
Remove Curb
202
L.F
4
Remove Pavement & Base
500
S.Y
5
Install LP Catch Basin
1
EA.
6
12" RCP N/A
7
Class 5 N/A Use Salvaged
Cl, 5
8
2341 Bit. Patching
16
TON
9
Restoration
MAY 27, 1987
$50.00
C. a.
0.2
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
$150.00
8250.00
$150.00
$7.00
$6.00
$56.00
$2.50
$1.50
$505.00
$1.50
$1.50
$750.00
$1,200.00
$700.00 $1,200.00
13
$50.00
$50.00 $800.00
$4,000.00 $800.00
$50.00 'j 0.fi�)
By City Forces
$50.00 1 c13 tA�
$4.79 $546.00
$4,807.00
1$O c"
(Topsoil & Seed)
0.2
Acre $4,000.00
10
Install Bulkhead
1
EA.
11
R&R CB Casting m7MH
1
EA.
Casting
12
Adjust B.V. Boz
2
EA.
13
Install Curb & Butter
78
L.F. $7.00
$50.00 $800.00
$4,000.00 $800.00
$50.00 'j 0.fi�)
By City Forces
$50.00 1 c13 tA�
$4.79 $546.00
$4,807.00
1$O c"
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Ken Ashfel d, City Engineer
SUBJECT: 13th Avenue; C.R. 89 to the East
Resolution No. 2734 Authorizing Bids
DATE: May 26, 1987
INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND:
The City has received approval from Mn/DOT to advance the status
of the 13th Avenue project to bid letting. Engineering
Department prepared the plans and specifications and these
documents have been approved by State -Aid. The City can apply
for state aid equal to 100% of the street construction and 77.6%
of the storm sewer construction.
Staff is now requesting Council to approve the plans and
specifications and authorize advertisements for bids. Plan
documents are available in my office and will also be available
at the Council meeting.
Adopt Resolution No. 2734.
REQUESTED ACTION:
Offer Resolution No. 2734, A Resolution Approving Plans and
Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for 13th
Avenue from County Road 89 to the East Corporate Limits, Project
No. 1986-9, and move its adoption.
KA/pmp
RES2734
/� P
RESOLUTION NO. 2734
A Resolution Approving Plans And Specifications
And Ordering Advertisement For Bids
13th Avenue from County Road 89
to the East Corporate Limits
Project No. 1986-9
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 2625 adopted by
Council on March 17, 1987, Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer,
prepared plans and specificati ns for the improvement of
Avenue from County Road 89 to t East Corporate Limits and
presented suc plans and spe ifications to the Council
approval
NOW, THERE RE, BE IT HE OLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, NNESOTA:
1 Such 1
City
has
13th
has
for
THE
P an and sp cifications, a copy of which is on
file and of record in the Of ice of the City Engineer, are hereby
approved.
2. The City Clerk s
the official paper and in
ment for bids upon the
agPrQlzftd x.lzdspec$
shall be published for t
done, shall state that I
until 10:00 A.M., on Ju
publicly opened in the
1 prepare and cause to be inserted in
e Construction Bulletin an advertise—
eing of such imgroveman_ts +uu1e_z vurh.
:a .ceknss ine A6vertisement for Bids
e e, shall specify the work to be
s w 1 be received by the City Clerk
24, 87, at which time they will be
lei, C ambers of the City Hall by the
City Clerk and Engineer or their designated party, will then be
tabulated, and will be onsidered the Council at 7:30
P.M., or thereafter on my 7, 1987, in the Council Chambers, and
that no bids will be c nsidered unle sealed and filed with the
City Clerk and accom anied by a cash deposit, cashier's check,
bid bond or certified check payable to he order of the City of
Shakopee for not less than five (5%) perc nt of the amount of the
Bid.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of ,
19_.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee.
ATTEST:
ty Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 19_
City Attorney
lel P
RESOLUTION NO. 2734
A Resolution Approving Plans And Specifications
And Ordering Advertisement For Bids
13th Avenue from County Road 89
to the East Corporate Limits
Project No. 1986-9
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 2625 adopted by City
Council on March 17, 1987, Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer, has
prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of 13th
Avenue from County Road 89 to the East Corporate Limits and has
presented such plans and specifications to the Council for
approval
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: -
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on
file and of record in the Office of the City Engineer, are hereby
approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in
the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertise-
ment for bids upon the making of such improvements under such
approved plans and specifications. The Advertisement for Bids
shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be
done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Clerk
until 10:00 A.M., on June 24, 1987, at which time they will be
publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the
City Clerk and Engineer, or their designated party, will then be
tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30
P.M., or thereafter on July 7, 1987, in the Council Chambers, and
that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the
City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check,
bid bond or certified check payable to the order of the City of
Shakopee for not less than five (5$) percent of the amount of the
Bid.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this
19_. day of ,
yor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 19_
ty Attorney
INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND:
Bids were publicly opened and read aloud for the 1987-8 Parks
Improvement Project. The proposed Resolution No. 2736 lists the
bidder and the amount of their respective bids. A further
breakdown of the bids is as follows:
Engineer's Estimate Low Bid
Schedule I
Tahpah Park $19,250.00 $18,522.00
Schedule II
Lion's Park $ 8,500.00 $ 8,030.00
Schedule III
Hiawatha Park $ 1,400.00 $ 1,074.00
KLUUMMEAVATIUN:
Adopt Resolution No. 2736.
REQUESTED ACTION:
Offer Resolution No. 2736, A Resolution Accepting Bid on City
Parks Improvement Project, No. 1987-8 and move its adoption.
KA/PMP
RES2736
MEMO TO:
John K. Anderson,
City Administrator
FROM:
Ken Ashfel d, City
Engineer�--
SUBJECT:
Parks Improvement
Project
DATE:
May 28, 1987
INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND:
Bids were publicly opened and read aloud for the 1987-8 Parks
Improvement Project. The proposed Resolution No. 2736 lists the
bidder and the amount of their respective bids. A further
breakdown of the bids is as follows:
Engineer's Estimate Low Bid
Schedule I
Tahpah Park $19,250.00 $18,522.00
Schedule II
Lion's Park $ 8,500.00 $ 8,030.00
Schedule III
Hiawatha Park $ 1,400.00 $ 1,074.00
KLUUMMEAVATIUN:
Adopt Resolution No. 2736.
REQUESTED ACTION:
Offer Resolution No. 2736, A Resolution Accepting Bid on City
Parks Improvement Project, No. 1987-8 and move its adoption.
KA/PMP
RES2736
RESOLUTION NO. 2736
A Resolution Accepting Bid On
City Parks Improvement Project
No. 198/7-8
WHEREAS, pursuant to an adv e,N tisement for bids for the City
Parks Improvement Project, bi s were received, opened and
tabulated according to law, and he following bids were received
complying with the advertisement
H.L. Johnson Company $27,626.00
P hal Balcktopping $27,937.00
Valle Paving $30,902.00
Barber Co traction $37,584.40
AND WHEREAS, 't ppears that H.L. Johnson Company, 2392
Pioneer Trail, Hamel, 55343 is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, HI ESO
1. The Mayor and Cit Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to enter ' to a cont ct with H.L. Johnson Company, in
the name of the City of Shak ee for the improvement of City
Parks Improvements Project by Par Improvements, according to the
plans and specifi ations therefor approved by the City Council
and on file in th office of the Ci Clerk.
2. The Ci Clerk is hereby uthorized and directed to
ret urn for
thwith to all bidders the aposits made with their
bids, except tha the deposits of the uc ce ssf ul bider and the
next lowest bid er shall be retai-ed un it a contract has been
signed.
Adopted in session of he City Council of
the City of Sha opee, Minnesota, held this day of
, 19_.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this day of
, 19_.
City Attorney -
RESOLUTION NO. 2736
A Resolution Accepting Bid On
City Parks Improvement Project
No. 1987-8
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the City
Parks Improvement Project, bids were received, opened and
tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received
complying with the advertisement:
H.L. Johnson Company $27,626.00
Plehal Balcktopping $27,937.00
Valley Paving $30,902.00
Barber Construction $37,584.40
AND WHEREAS, it appears that H.L. Johnson Company, 2392
Pioneer Trail, Hamel, MN 55343 is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to enter into a contract with H.L. Johnson Company, in
the name of the City of Shakopee for the improvement of City
Parks Improvements Project by Park Improvements, according to the
plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council
and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their
bids, except that the deposits of the successful bide r and the
next lowest bidder shall be retai:.ed until a contract has been
signed.
Adopted in session of the City Council of
the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
, 19_.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this day of
19_.
City Attorney -
arse.
MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority/
City Council
FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, Executive Director/Community
Development Director
RE: Letter on Former Prison Site - Attached
DATE: June 2, 1987
Introduction•
Earlier this Spring the City acquired an option to purchase
the site of the former womens Prison in Shakopee. The
perspective developer for the property, Mr. Thomas Massey, has
been working on possible redevelopment schemes.
Background:
The developer met with the Shakopee Planning Commission on
May 21, 1987. At that time the Planning Commission discussed the
concept at some length and subsequently indicated their
opposition to the redevelopment proposal and to the rezoning
which would be necessary in order to allow for a mixed use
residential/office project. -
Subsequent to that Mr. Massey (DBA Kentford Development)
again looked at the site to determine if a residential - only
development concept would work. The attached letter from Mr.
Massey indicates that they do not think that a residential
development would be economically feasible under the current
conditions.
The letter also indicates
the City for assistance would
further, but that without this
further at this time.
that an advance commitment from
result in them evaluating it
they will not pursue the subject
The Community Development Director will discuss the subject
in greater detail under the other business item on the agenda.
May 29, 1987
Mr. John Anderson
City Manager
City of Shakopee
Shakopee, MN 55379-1376
Dear John,
�,50ECEIVED
iUN-21117
" Y !1F SH A v r1P-'-
We have spent considerable time in evaluating the former Shakopee Womens Prison
site since our proposal last October. An investigation of the site from top to bottom,
inside and out, along with the study dll( several redevelopment concepts has convinced
us that we can not proceed without advanced comm ittm�fit from the city for
assistance for the reasons outlined bel w. /
Weare baffled by the lack of interest de nstrated by t e planning commission to
examine alternative uses for the buildings at will per it them to be renovated. They
are correct in assuming that it will be expen 've to re ovate these buildings for an
adaptive reuse. However, it is expensive annfo nate for the community if they
remain empty or are destroyed.
Without major city assistance to develop the si , t city of Shakopee runs the risk that
the buildings will remain closed and empty cr ating eyesore and health risk to the
communtiy. Deterioration from weather wil ventually orce the cost of demolition and
the city will lose taxes in the interim. It is so possible t t the state or county could
find another use for the buildings that w Id be much less esirable than retrofiting
them with small offices.
We are not inexperienced developeys. We have tackled som of the most difficult
projects in the city of Minneapolis.. t is unlikely that others will d the site more
attractive. Unfortunately for the c y and the buildings, it may taka time before the
problem is recognized. Many of the projects we encounter have lost money or value
due to the inactivity of the property. We hope that can be prevented.
We remain advocates of your community and we appreciate the time you have spent
with us. Obviously, we do not want to lose the cost of the time we have have put into
this project. If the city decides to encourage development on this site we would like to
continue our discussions with you. Please consider the enclosed outline of our
concerns.
Very trul rs,
_ �pj
omas M. Mass
May 29, 1987
Mr. John Anderson
City Manager
City of Shakopee
Shakopee, MN 55379-1376
Dear John,
/S0ECEIVED
;UN - 21%7
We have spent considerable time in evaluating the former Shakopee Womens Prison
site since our proposal last October. An investigation of the site from top to bottom,
inside and out, along with the study of several redevelopment concepts has convinced
us that we can not proceed without an advanced committment from the city for
assistance for the reasons outlined below.
We are baffled by the lack of interest demonstrated by the planning commission to
examine alternative uses for the buildings that will permit them to be renovated. They
are correct in assuming that it will be expensive to renovate these buildings for an
adaptive reuse. However, it is expensive and unfortunate for the community if they
remain empty or are destroyed.
Without major city assistance to develop the site, the city of Shakopee runs the risk that
the buildings will remain closed and empty creating an eyesore and health risk to the
communtiy. Deterioration from weather will eventually force the cost of demolition and
the city will lose taxes in the interim. It is also possible that the state or county could
find another use for the buildings that would be much less desirable than retrofiting
them with small offices.
We are not inexperienced developers. We have tackled some of the most difficult
projects in the city of Minneapolis. It is unlikely that others will find the site more
attractive. Unfortunately for the city and the buildings, it may take time before the
problem is recognized. Many of the projects we encounter have lost money or value
due to the inactivity of the property. We hope that can be prevented.
We remain advocates of your community and we appreciate the time you have spent
with us. Obviously, we do not want to lose the cost of the time we have have put into
this project. If the city decides to encourage development on this site we would like to
continue our discussions with you. Please consider the enclosed outline of our
concerns.
Ve� rotas,
/�
T omas M. Mas
ISG
Considerations:
• The buildings are a landmark and represent Shakopee's heritage.
• The buildings are structurally sound with architectural character.
• The site is bounded by industrial zoning on the north and the new prison on the
south.
• Views are poor toward the north and northeast of the site.
• The site has served a public use as office and residential for about 60 years.
• The large trees on the north must be saved as a major site amenity.
• Location of large trees makes the site difficult to develop a density that will
offset land acquisition costs, street construction and demolition.
• Site slope on the north makes development north of the large trees difficult to
access and offers very poor views.
• The Shakopee Planning Commission is unwilling to consider an adaptive
reuse that will permit small offices in the existing buildings.
• Many attractive new housing sites are available to compete with this site.
• The townhouse market is very risky in today's market.
• The site is inappropriate and too expensive for single familily home sites.
• A market study would be required before developing small office space or
residential in this location.
• New street, sewer and water must be installed to access the center of the site.
• No soil tests are available - the soil conditions and water table are unknown.
• Asbestos removal is necessary during renovation or demolition.
• Interest rates for new mortgages have been rising.
• The site is a difficult and high risk project to develop, evidenced by the poor
response to the RFP issued by the city.
w Tm
=0=
x
m
mm�
mME
;:E9
i0{
mmN
o zm
yNm
-0
9r
oD
Oz
2
N
m
m
m
ADAMS STREET
0
N $
K
_ c
D
-y
•
r
m
~
r
M
m
Z
o
N '
o
0)
m
N,•
m
r
n
N
N
m
m
WEBSTER STREET
0
660 ft
0
60 ft
t
N $
O
_ c
•
D
O
0
r
• r •'
N '
o
0)
m
N,•
m
r
N
m
m
z
H
N TL
%OM
x=m
Tse
m=E Z
;:E9
i0{
mfn
O Z=�
s (n m
-om
Mr
N>
O=
Z
N
m
m
ADAMS STREET
660 ft
0
y
r N
It
w
O r
i
O
G
n
N
I
CD
N'S
0
D
N
0
y
r N
It
C
O r
i
O
G
n
N
I
CD
T
4'' CD
EM
WEBSTER STREET
60 ft
-
N
0
y
O'
r
' C
O
G
tD -
0
N
m
y
;o=
xa�
mm-;:
maZ
s:ey
i om
Zi
NmN
O=y
aNm
� 9
an
0.
Z
ym
-1
m
(Z /
ADAMS STREET
i �5-clv-
660 ft
WEBSTER STREET
/Sr-,
A 089
133HIS swvav
i
r
U)
z
ZO
Qy
JD:
as
Wya
~zo
NW w
Oz
¢OR
Q3�
Z_¢w
Mw t
=20
Lum Y
Q
1
Wm
u oa
133H1S H31S93M
133d1S SWVav
ID
w
N
Z
=O
Qy
JQ
as
Wy F
~ZO'
fA w w
¢Oz
¢3�
z¢w
Awa
CEO Y
20 x
LLLL b
-
O
_
rTr O
z _
9
.
,
-�
G 11
• G'
C
b
b
O
C O
F
_ F
b
133d1S SWVav
ID
w
N
Z
=O
Qy
JQ
as
Wy F
~ZO'
fA w w
¢Oz
¢3�
z¢w
Awa
CEO Y
20 x
LLLL b
3NIl UU3dOHd MON
0
0)
R
cu
m
naiina
NOSIUd
z
p
o
a
�
H
�
N
J W
O -
Z
.
Z
O
Z o
H O
= o
J
�
C W
�
W =
�
U
C I
i
� H
V
C N
Z
y
J Z
_
C C
W L
W
W
J Z
H O
z
2_
vWiC
�
O W
L F
u
e
O
c
C �
aW�
naiina
NOSIUd
s/1,-�/o
Mitmeapofis Star and Tribune/Mon
2ommercial real estate/
Siuburbs are the new frontier
`mixed-use' complexes
the urban frontier pushed through
on
urban decades ago that the
-civ is a relative old-timer in the
uli[ropolitan area Now, n holo` -
illages are sponging uP within its
+oiindaries in development schemes
'.hat may chammetize much urban
sgwth of the future.
The biraword in the development
mdustry for what's happening along
mterstate Hwy. 494 near York and
Fence Avs- S. is `mixed-use pro -
eel." It simply means clustering ele-
m,mx such as residential, commer
-ia1 and retail development, often
under one roof.. _
The concept has become coemmn-
place in crowded downtowns, but for
the most part suburban develop -
menu have consisted of free-standing
buildings surrounded by a sea of
parking IOL
Edinbcrough, an $80 million com-
plgx on the northwest quadrant of I-
49 and York in Edina, is a departure
from suburban tradition. This spring
tenant, started moving into a 7 -story
office and retail building, 392 condos
and an 18 -story apartment building
for the elderly. A one -acre enclosed
city Park that links the buildings is
expected to open this week
the mixed-use trend is catching on
elsewhere in the Twin Cities. As gh,
alto unpack boxes p sing another
developers are proposing another
such project — four times as large
for a 90 -acre parcel to the west
united Properties has an option to
guy the property, which is northeast
cif 1.494 and France Av. S. from
Hedberg and Sort The land, a sand
,aid gravel mine until now, is the last
4abstantial undeveloped parcel in
Edina
Preliminary plans call for office, resi-
dential and retail holdings plus a
health club and a park, including a
St) -acre lake. Developers are expected
to seek ramming in July.
r
And in another example, Trammell
43ow Co. is using the concept on a
mega -scale in the Carlson Center in
Minnetonka and Plymouth...
Fdinborough is a special breed of
mixed-use projem bemuse n links
moderate -to -expensive elderly hour-
.__ .—I -a " __.:_A ,-node.
Sharon Schmickle
intended
for the joint venture betwgfm the city
and thtce malor'develo rs was m
lure business and youn mikes into
a well-heeled bur a g bedroom
..we were in a sit tion where we
had the highest age in the
metro area and a real problem
with affordabilit of housin&" said
Gordon Hughes,'Edina's city Planner
and HRA director. "Our fust Plan-
ar¢ elicits included more condos
But the off% market started going
soft and city officials were cool in the
idea of a massive condo complex. So
the elderly component was added N
the hope that longtime Edina resi-
dents would sell homes to young
families and move into the 203
apartment units that rent from $800
to $2,000 monthly.
The result is a social experiment
shaped by the marketplace, a devel-
opmrnt industry tread and the public
interest. Industry observers say we
are going in may see many more such
permutations of the mixed-use ap-
proach projects over the next few
years.
More construction
Despite the overbuilding that
prompted Edinborough developers to
scale down offices in their Pmject,
some major office construction is
taking place just across 1494 in
Rirnmineton. Homan Development
Co. plans to open n
its 5200 million i
first phase of
lesota Center
N-tdnm
ry ice building is on the
e d Fiance Av. drive-in
t a northwest comtt of 1 -
nm Av. S. Homan plans
nsnuming a second build -
n this one is 50 -percent
d eventua._ bold up to L5
quare feet ;.f office space mitional buildings.
finished assembling its 27 -
acre site for the project by buying the
Ramada Hotel and its six -acre site on
1494 in December. Hernial plans m
raze the hotel and replace it with a
new luxury hotel,probably after Ra-
ma,Ws lease expires in two years
uncan Dayton and Ray Mithun,
Sr. ve broken ground for a 38,000.
sq foot office budding in do --
town Wayrata at the intersection of
lake t and Minnemnka Av. BRW
Inc ' ed the project called "445
lake."
■ Opus rix is building a 48,000 -
square -foo office/warehouse bad -
mg in Ea dale Center for Shaw
Industries. a building will be com-
pleted in Get
■ Ryan Cc tion Co. has started
building a ne headquarters for
AmeriData Syste lne, in the Ryan
Business Center, at Av. N. and
Nathan lane., PI_ are. The 52.1
.nitlinn nne_nnry st one is to be
which employs more tk4 250 peo-
ple, is presently at 7008 onhland
Dr., Brooklyn Park
■ Aeration Industries Inc is building
a new headquarters at 4100 Peary
Rd., Chaska The $2.6 million pro-
ject being built by Rosewood Corp. is
to be completed in November. The
city provided S 1.6 million in tax in-
crement financing and industrial de-
velopment bonds Aeration's corpo-
race offices have been at the Hazel-
tine Gates Olhce Center.
Minneapolis Star and Tribune/Morn
i
ommercial real estate/
_ eel. t in
Suburbs are the new
frontier
dor `mixed-use' e®rapiexes
YL
-he urban frontier pushed through
ona so many decades ago that the
Co. plans to open the first phase of
its 5200 Caliber, Minnesota Center
_
-
M, isa relative old-timer in the
next month.
nl�&opolilan area Now, newcomer-
illages are springing up within its
The 16 -story office building is on the
o�ndanes m development schemes
hat may characterize much urban
site of the old France Av. drive-in
theater at the northwest comer of I-
:rowth of the future.
494 and France Av. S. Homan plans
to start Constructing a second build.
The buzzword in the development
.ndustry for what s happening along
ing when this one is 50 -percent
leased and eventua:-, build up to 1.5
:nterstase Hwy. 494 near York and
=mace A. S. is -"mixed-use pro-
million square feet of office space in
thin additional buildings.
- 1 , s clusteringele- Deveiopment
y mean
nems such M residential, commer-
_ial and retail development, often Sharon Schfnidde
under one roof..-
The concept has become common-
olace in crowded downtowns, but for
the most pan suburban develop-
ments have consisted of free-standing
buildings surrounded by a sea of
parking lot.
Edinborough, an SBO milliov Com-
plgx on the nanhwen quadrant of I-
494and York in I a, is a departure
from suburban tradiuom Tha spnng
variants started moving into a 7 -story
office and retail building, 392 condos
and an 18 -story apartment building
for the elderly. A one -acre enclosed
citq park that links the buildings is
eipected to open this week.
a_
The mixed -tau trend is etching on
-
aints unpack
in the Twin Cities. n [en-
dev unpack boxes p sing another developers — proposing mesa another
such project pa four times as large —
for a 90 -acre poral to the west
United Properties has an option to
tiny the property, which is northeast
iff 1-494 and Fmnm Av. S. from
Hedberg and Sons The land, a sand
and gravel mine until now, is the last
sbbsuntial undeveloped pastel in
s =
Preliminary plans call for office, resi-
dential and retail buildings plus a
health club and a park, including a
W -acre lake. Developers are expected
in another example, Trammell
Co. is using the concept on a
-sale in the Carlson Center in
Edinborough is a special bead of
mixed-use project bemuse it links
moderate -to -expensive elderly hour-
..._
that are intended for young first-time
home buyers That's not what the
Edina Housing and Redevelopment
Authority (HRA) envisioned when it
started assembling a E20 million sub
tidy package for the project in 1980.
From the city's PersPecuve, [h< goal
for the joint venture between the City
and three major developers was to
lure business and young families into
a well-heeled but aging bedroom
Community.
"We were in a situation where we
had the highest median age in the
metro area and also a real problem
with affordability of housing." said
Gordon Hughes,-FAina's city planner
and HRA director. "Chir first plan-
ning efforts included more Condos
and offices"
But the office market started going
soft and city officials were tool to the
idea of a massive condo complex. So
the elderly component was added in
the hope that longtime Edina resi-
dents would sell homes to young
families and move into the 203
apartment units that mnt from 5800
to 52,000 monthly.
The result is a social .experiment
shaped by the marketplace, a devel-
opment industry trend and the public
interest Industry observers say we
are going m may see many more such
permutations of the mixed-use ap-
proach projects over the next few
years
More construction
Despite the overbuilding that
prompted Edinborough dewlap= to
scale down offacs in their project,
same maior office construction is
taking place just across 1494 in
Rin,rninatnn. Homan Development
Homan finished assembling its 27 -
acre site for the project by buying the
Ramada Hotel and its sixacem site on
1494 in December. Homart plans to
rue the hotel and replace it with a
new luxury hotel,. probably after Ra-
mada's lease expires in two years
Other projects/
IN Duncan Dayton and Ray Mithun,
Sr. have broken ground for a 38.000.
square -foot office building in down-
town Wayzata at the intetseedon of
Lake St and Minnetonka Av. BRW
Inc. designed the Project called "445
Iaka"
■ Opus Corp. is building a 49,000.
square -foot office/warehouse build-
ing in Fagandale Center for Shaw
Industries The building will be mm -
plated in October.
■ Ryan Construction Co. has started
building a new headquarters for
AmeriDau Systems Inc in the Ryan
Bastions Centra, 51st Av. N. and
Nathan Lane., Plvmouth. The S2.1
million, one-smry structure is to be
finished in late summer. AmeriData,
which employs more than 250 peo-
ple, is presently at 7008 Northland
Dr, Brooklyn Park.
■ Aeration Industries Inc. is building
a new headquarters at 4100 Peavy
Rd., Chaska The S2.6 million pro-
ject being built by Rosewood Corp. is
to be Completed in November. The
city provided $1.6 million in tax in-
crement financing and industrial de-
velopment bonds. Aeration's Conlin -
rate offices have been at the Hazel-
une Gates Office Center.
/sd
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Interfund Transfers
DATE: June 3, 1987
INTRODUCTION•
The Auditor has identified a potential for different
interpretations on whether the City has complied with the Revenue
Sharing reporting requirements for budgeting.
BACKGROUND•
The year Revenue Sharing budget was adopted and then amended
based on buying certain items of equipment. Some 1985 items were
not bought and others were budgeted in 1985, but not bought till
1986. Modifications to the budget did not keep up with actual
purchases. In order to avoid "muddying the water" and a
potential audit discloser, I propose swapping an approved
transfer of $10,901 from the Revenue Sharing Fund to be from the -
Capital Equipment Fund instead. This is for the fiscal year
1986.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Move to approve of the reduction of transfers from the
Revenue Sharing Fund to the General Fund and the increase of
transfers from the Capital Equipment Fund to the General Fund in
the amount of $10,901 for the 1986 fiscal year.
GV1ps