HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/07/1986 MEMO TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items
DATE: October 2 , 1986
1. The City received thank you cards from Jeanette Shaner and
Ray and Kathy Ruuska. Jeanette ' s new daughter ' s name is
Sarah. Ray' s mother passed away recently.
2 . I have been in contact with the Conlin Company and it
appears we will receive free surplus fertilizer from Conlin
to apply to our ball fields this fall. I have also
contacted Toro Company regarding free mowing. Discussions
are still underway but we may be able to schedule Toro
Company mowing on several of our parks. Toro Company mows
grass for free to put hours on their experimental equipment
to test it out.
3 . Some time ago the City approved a Resolution to establish a
procedure for private utilities owned and maintained by home
associations. At that meeting Council asked if we were
obtaining "field corrected as built plans" for regular one
owner apartment complexes. Leroy has indicated that it is
his standard practice to get "field corrected as built
plans" for such projects .
4. Some time ago Ken Theis petitioned for sanitary sewer for
his Valley Publishing building. We have not spent any time
on the feasibility report because Ken Theis hasn' t followed
through properly. In a similar fashion the developer who
petitioned for the Market Street utility feasibility backed
away from that project so Engineering is not working on that
feasibility report either. Finally, we had anticipated the
need to have OSM study the flow capacity of the sanitary
sewers serving the swimming pool and flowing north through
6th Avenue. The major problem was a swimming pool
backwashing procedure that was modified. For this reason we
have not had OSM working on this project. If the
Councilmembers have any questions regarding the status of
these three projects they can contact me.
5 . Barry Stock has been selected as editor for a new "In
Transit" newsletter representing communities not dependent
upon the MTC.
6 . Attached is the monthly calendar for the Month of October,
1986 .
7 . Attached is a letter from Senator Rudy Boschwitz responding
to our concerns over the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) .
8. Attached is a letter from Senator Dave Durenberger
responding to our concerns about budgeting money for the
design of a bridge replacement for the Bloomington Ferry
Bridge.
9 . Attached is an informational item I put together for
Superintendent Gaden Carruth regarding the tax impact of the
proposed annexation.
10 . Attached is the monthly Cable TV and Access report for the
Month ending August, 1986 .
11. Attached are the minutes of the September 4 , 1986 meeting of
the Shakopee Coalition.
12 . Attached are the minutes of the September 4 , 1986 meeting of
the Shakopee Planning Commission.
13 . Attached are the minutes of the September 10 , 1986 meeting
of the Downtown Ad Hoc Committee.
14 . Attached is the Engineering Department' s monthly Project
Status Report for the Month ending 9/30/86 .
15 . Attached is a letter from Dave MacGillivray investigating
the feasibility of doing an advanced refunding of TIF bonds
for K-Mart and Canterbury Downs. Dave, Gregg and I believe
the gain to be so marginal that we are recommending that we
not do the advanced refunding at this time. If you have
questions, please call me.
16. Projection for Taxing Districts.
17 . Attached are the minutes of the September 10 , 1986 meeting
of the Industrial Commercial Commission.
18 . Attached is the Agenda for the October 8 , 1986 Downtown Ad
Hoc Committee.
19. Attached are the minutes of the Downtown Ad Hoc Committee .
meeting of October 1, 1986 .
20 . Attached is the agenda for the October 9 , 1986 Planning
Commission meeting.
21 . Attached is the Agenda for the October 9 , 1986 Board of
Adjustment and Appeals meeting.
K
N ry
N l.n
00 �] M C)
•• H- (D p rt r-
on n wN t:r
O (D C 0N �-j o
(D J FJ P. Y
L �
l
OAK O � � y
b h— b t
K
1
In H —I c) C7
Li C) w9 :V-
CD O �l
*'3
W rt rt,
d Cd
O
(D �l
@ L7
b
N In 00 K co
� 1-3M � � ro
.. n .. p
Lo W (D W W y
O �5 �l O
rooms rove'
rt H.
tJ
P) K
H
d
K
u
W
L7
C
i { N
LOWELL WEICKER,JR..CONNECTICUT,CHAIRMAN
RUDY BOSCHWITZ.MINNESOTA DALE BUMPERS,ARKANSAS
SLADE GORTON,WASHINGTON SAM NUNN.GEORGIA
DON NICKLES.OKLAHOMA JAMES R.SASSER,TENNESSEE
WARREN RUDMAN.NEW HAMPSHIRE MAX BAUCUS.MONTANA
AlFI1fIAF.4L..R:4AAAT(l,,•IF2N.�RRY
',A%2 a4lk.'MSLKLvAh
BOB KASTEN. ILLINOIS
LARRY P ESSLER,SOUTH DAKOTA DAVID L.BISCONSIN ALAN J. IOREN,OKLAHOMAsited Mates senate
BARRY GOLDWATER,ARIZONA TOM HARKIN,IOWA
PAUL S.TRIBLE,JR.,VIRGINIA JOHN F.KERRY,MASSACHUSETTS COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS
ROBERT J.DOTCHIN,STAFF DIRECTOR
R.MICHAEL HAYNES,CHIEF COUNSEL WASHINGTON, DC 20510
JOHN W.BALL 111.MINORITY CHIEF COUNSEL
September 12, 1986
The Honorable Eldon A. Reinke
Mayor of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Eldon:
Just a short note to inform you that the Department of Labor
has informed me that many letters, similar to yours , were
included in the official rulemaking record with regard to
proposed regulations applicable to state and local governments
under the Fair Labor Standards Act ( FLSA) .
The Department of Labor has yet to reach final decision on
the new regulation which would greatly affect state and local
authorities' ability to maintain firefighting programs. However,
they did indicate that many others shared your views regarding
the issue of volunteer firefighters and that this would be taken
into consideration. They did not say when a final decision would
be reached.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if I may be of further
assistance to you on this matter.
Sincerely,
Rudy Boschwitz
RB:mbl
SEP 18 �9�
DAVE DURENBERGER
MINNESOTA
' nif eb ,$fates .Sencti¢ a
VED
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510 SEP 91986
September 17 , 1986 C17'Y
Mr . John K. Anderson.
City Administrator
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee , Minnesota 55379
Dear John :
I appreciate your taking the time to write and express your
support for replacement of the Bloomington Ferry Bridge.
No one disputes the need for a new bridge . In addition to
the extensive number of closings this year , the bridge was
flooded 20 days in 1985 , 60 days in 1984 , and 54 days in 1983 .
And, having spent my share of frustrating spring evenings trying
to reach Shakopee from Bloomington -- before the opening of
Cantebury Downs -- I share your desire to see CSAR 18 upgraded
and the bridge replaced.
As you might expect , the biggest obstacles to construction
of a new bridge are time and money. According to officials from
the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Scott County, the
most immediate need is $2 . 75 million for a Location Design Study
Report and the preparation of a two year Detailed Bridge Design
study. Construction of the bridge itself would begin as early
as October 1988, provided $37 million in federal assistance is
made available .
Unfortunately, despite the tremendous national demand for
discretionary bridge funds there is very little federal funding
available for local bridge projects like the Bloomington Ferry
Bridge. In an attempt to assist the county and thousands of
frustrated drivers , during the Senate Environment and Public
Works Committee consideration of the Surface Transportation
Reauthorization Act of 1986 , I was successful in adding language
directing the Secretary of Transportation to provide funds for
the Bloomington Ferry Bridge , provided that the state requests
her to do so. Hopefully the House of Representatives will agree
to my amendment and allow this extremely important project to
proceed .
Thanks again for writing.
incerely,
D ve Durenberger
United States Senator
DD/djm
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
INCORPORATED 1870 '
129 EAST FIRST AVENUE, SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379.1376 (612) 445-3650
September 19 , 1986
f
Ms. Gaden Carruth, Superintendent
Independent School District 720
505 South Holmes
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Re: Proposed Annexation Of Josephine Vierling' s 150 Acres
Affect On Taxes
Dear Ms. Carruth:
The City has completed a preliminary estimate of the
increased taxes that would be paid on the 150. 3 acres being
proposed for annexation by a Josephine Vierling estate. The
attached letter from Assessor Robert Schmitt, Scott County
Property Appraiser, lists the net tax currently paid on the 150 . 3
acres, and the estimated tax that would be paid on one
standardized residential lot with an average home value of
$85 , 000 .
The City Engineer has estimated the total number of
residential lots created should the area be totally developed
into residential lots as follows:
AREA PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION
150 . 3 acres converted to Sq. Ft. = 6 , 546 , 450 sq. ft.
Minus loo for Park Dedication - 654, 645 sq. ft.
Minus 15% for Streets - 981, 967 sq. ft.
Total Developable Area = 4 , 909 , 838 sq. ft.
Standard Residential lot size 140 'X90 ' = 12,600 sq. ft.
Total Number of Lots 4, 909 , 838=12 , 600 = 390 Lots
Net tax 390 lots X $1,377. 00 = 537, 030. 00
It is clear from these raw estimates that the "potential"
increase in taxes paid on the 150. 3 acres after residential
development is significant for the City of Shakopee and School
District 720.
The Heart of Progress Valley
T
The City of Shakopee has an unusually large commercial-
industrial tax base and is currently penalized through the
Fiscal Disparities Law for the large assessed valuation per capita
this creates. For this reason the City of Shakopee has made it
a high priority to promote residential development to increase
population growth at a rate equal to or greater than our increases
in commercial-industrial assessed value. The development of this
150 acres into residential lots would go far in achieving this
goal.
Sincerely,
John K. Anderson
City Administrator
JKA/jb
® zylstra - united cable
television company
Jawalem SYSTEM
MONTH END REPORT
BEGIN INSTALL DISC TOTAL
ECONOVISION (TIER I)
BASIC (TIER II)
HBO 3 ��
CINEMAX
HTN
SHOWTIME
TMC 717 ,�
DISNEY
BRAVO
SPECTRUM SPORTS — —
ADDITIONAL OUTLETS
REMOTE CONTROLS
CINEMAX DISCOUNTED (WITH OTHER PREMIUMS) 9
CINEMAX NON–DISCOUNTED (SINGLE, MAX ONLY)
TOTAL SUBSCRIBERS
123 West 3rd Street P.Q. Boz 146 Chaska, MN 55318 612/448-3831
�
�
SHAKOPEE PUBLIC ACCESS REPORT
Public Access Equipment Usage
1/2 Editing 0 8 6 8 5 27
3/4 Editing O 4 7 7 6 24
Studio 0 5 2 17 2 26
Film Chain O 0 0 0 O 0
Comments: Now that summer is comming to an end, I hope that
everyone is pleased to see that the hourly use of the equipment
is increaseing. Bill and I feel that this is still at the low end
of the spectrum for maximuim use.
Monthly Promotion
Date 8-14-86
Organization: Scott County 4-H
Contact: Kim Bell
Description of Presentation: After the 4-H group video taped
their presentations at the Scott County Fair Kim brought a group
of kids into the studio to learn how to use the editing,
character generator and other video equipment. The kids then
edited the Fair presentations into a public access program for
the community to view.
Date: Aug. 7, 1986
Organization: The River Valley Chapter (Full Gospel Bus. Men's Assn. )
Contact person: John Bjorklund
Description of Presentation: John showed an interest in public
access, so we invited him to bring his organization into the
studio to learn more about public access. Since then, John has
invited public access to air 20 productions put out by the Full
Gospel Business Men's Fellowship International , and is preparing
his people to produce their own Bible Study Show to be video
taped each week in the studio starting soon this fall .
Date: Aug. 19, 1986
Organization: ---------
Contact person: Gary McKiver
Description of Presentation: We met Gary while investigating the
Candidates Review show. He has a unique talent for writing music.
We invited him in to learn more about public access. Since then
Gary is looking at helping us with original music scores and on
other public access promotions.
Copyright 1986 New Frontier Productions Incorporated
Page 1
SHAKOPEE PUBLIC ACCESS REPORT
New Frontier Productions Inc Equipment Usage
During the month of August NFP did not use any of the Public
Access equipment for its own personal use to generate revenue.
Character Generator Revenue
Don Hamilton advertised on page 13 from 8/25/86 toy 'x/8/86: cost $33.00
Bill Nevin Adertised on page 16 from 9/3/86 to 9/8/86: cost $12.00
Channel Three Cablecasting
Week. 1 week e_ week. ✓ week. 4 week 5 total
2 10.5 9 14 9 44 hours
Description: I arra happy to say that access users are over their
vacation for the summer and new programming is starting to be
produced by local users. New Shows for f_
as e ar
August follows:
1lows:
Candidates in Review; Produced by New Frontier- Productions
And Public Access. We invited each candidate: to fill a five
minute segment introducing themselves to the viewing_ audience. We
had a goad turn out from the candidates to produce a 56 minute
program for channel three. As a promotional toil, we contacted
all of the Scott County libraries to see if they were interested
in checking out a copy of the production for each of the local
branches. We received an ex.celent response and dubbed 8 copies
for the library system to be destributed by the Shakopee branch.
We have since received comments that this was a very worthwhile
project and the video tapes have been in use.
4--H Youth In Action, The Sheriff Candidates: Barb Weckman
from the 4-H organization of Scott County, organized this
production through the 4--H group. She brought in a group of
4'--H'rs to be trained on the studio functions (caldera, switcher,
audio, character generator, and recorder) . On Tuesday 26, Barb
had the trained group, a panel of five sheriffs and an audience
of about 30 in the studio to tape an hour long debate between the
sheriffs. Each canidate was given 2 minutes to answer questions
delivered by 14--17 year old 4-H young adults.
Shakopee Varsity Football: New Frontier Productions Is
producing the Cablecasting of the Shakopee Varsity Football Games
on a delayed basis. Each game will be recorded and cablecast the
following Saturday and the following Wednesday. Each game
Copyright 1986 New Frontier ProductionsIrtoor n {-
p_ra,ed
Page
�
'
SHAKOPEE PUBLIC ACCESS REPORT
consists of a the first half with a play by play from the
announcer at the game; a half time show (band, team interviews or
commments); the second half with commentary; Sideline Chatter
with Coach Vaughan (Dale Vaughan gives a 5-10 minute recap of the
game hi-lighting special plays and events that happened during
the game. While he talks about the plays, the plays are shown
simuItaniously with the commentary. )
Maintenance
Equipment: Panasonic WV-555 Camera #2
Repair: Adjusted remote audio
cost: No cost to Access Corp. - Repair done 'in house'
Equipment: JVC 3/4" portable recorder
Repair: bad audio ch. 2
cost: no cost to Access Corp. - Repair done 'in house'
Equipment: Sony 1270 Monitor/Receiver
Repair: High Voltage Dropout
cost: ? (no cost to Access Corp. )
Equipment: JVC camera
Repair: loose Mic
cost: no cost to Access Corp. - Repair done 'in house'
Equipment: Shintron 505 C.G. &—� `
Repair: #4 is bad -�
cost: no cost to Access Corp. - Repair done ' in house'
Equipment: Sony 1270 Mon/Rec
Repair: Heat related H.V.
cost: ? (no cost to Access Corp. - Repair done ' in house' )
Equipment: Panasonic Power Supply 8420 (2)
Repair: Burned out
cost: To be Determined - Repairs incomplete
Equipment: Sony DX3 Headset
Repair: lost screw and needed soldering
cost: no cost to Access Corp. - Repair done 'in house'
Copyright 1986 New Frontier Productions Incorporated
Page 3
- -
` / �
- "
'
SHAKOPEE PUBLIC ACCESS REPORT
Wish, List
Music Library
Lens for Slide Projector
Panisonic WV-555
Lens For 16mm Projector
Chopper W/Pilot
Phone Answering Machine � �»
Glenwood Water Cooler
Cheap Stop Watch
Track Lighting
Audio Headsets
1/2" Video Tape
Cassette Recorder
Special Effects Character Generator
Portable Modulator
Wireless Headsets
Portable Lighting System
10' X 12' Projector Screen
N*w Equipment
The New Telex headsets and Patchbay arrived this month. We
hope that these two improvements help to promote public access
and upgrade the quality of the productions produced in the field
or studio. We will be experiencing a new pattern of rewireing to
incorporate the patch bay into our existing system. As soon as
this is complete, We will be providing a new updated user manual
and studio schematic for the studio.
Bill and I are proud to point out another new piece of
equipment added to the studio for the public. A new 1/2"
2/4/6 hour video tape machine. This new machine will remain
property of New Frontier Productions Inc. but during our contract
with SCAC, we hope this machine will come in handy and recieve
many hours of use from the public.
Copyright 1986 New Frontier Productions Incorporated
Page 4
t
I
Y
V ��Y
a
r�
SHAKOPEE COALITION
MEETING MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 4, 1986
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 A.M. by Chairman
Citizens State Bank Community Room. Brian Norris in the
Members Present: Joan Salter(Food Shelf
Kes(Guest), Sr Jo Lambert(St. Francis RegionalrMedical (Center)City of Shakopee) Jackie
(Citizens State Bank) , Brian Norris
Count , Kay Louis(Scott County Extension) , Debbra Determan(Scott
Y), Jeanette Kleve(SACS), Don Mertz(Lions Club
)q Claud Columbus), Jerry Knutson(Minnesota Correctional Facility/Shakopee), John
Anderson(City of Shakopee), Mary Sullivan(Scott—Carver Economic Council
George Muenchow(Shakopee Community Services). c )� John K.
), and
Chairman Norris recognized Jackie Kes as September Volunteer Of The Mon
As a former member of the Coalition the members were aware what an Outstanding
recipient she was. Her voluntary Month.
the good that she has done whenemployedlby Scr
hments have been just as greatasSome of her accomplishments have resulted fromott workingveinEher chu Council.
and her community. She is a loving and carings church, scouting,
person
seven, but yet had time also for others. n who raised a family of
Joan Salter reported on the Food Shelf.
The figure Of 1
fairly constant all summer as to number served. In Augusto therefamilies
This breaks down to 643 individuals and 2,667 meals from Scott County alone.
This broke down further to 7,728# of food provided in the two count
In Shakopee alone there were 44 households with 118 individuals. Joan is
full what will be ha Y program.
happening once the warmer weather stops and the supply fear—
fresh fruits and vegetables stop.
Ppyof
Joan also commented that she had metwith Alvina Busacker, Sr. Citizens Dire
in Shakopee, to discuss possible candidates for the position of Volunteer
Coordinator. A coordinator still is needed in the area of family needs. Director
Several topics were shared by several members:
1. John Anderson — Shakopee Streets are under construction with the Holmes
Street Sewer Project to be completed this fall. Fourth
Avenue also is a major project. Downtown Streetscape en—
hancement will start next year. A portion of the 2nd Ave.
parking lot under construction will feature some items
being considered for the downtown project. The parking lot
is being financed by local property owners and Tax Increment
2• Kay LouisFinancing. The Holmes Street Bridge upgrading
movin
— Reported that the current printing of the dS ottsContyg ahead.
Resource Directory was sold out. Several Workshops are forth—
coming including one entitled "Farm Help". Scott County
Extension is going all out to provide assistance to hurting
farmers. They also are looking for some funding to finance a
"Family Farm Resource Guide" that they have prepared. They
are working with Scott County Human Services in the develop—
ment of a Financial Management Training Program. Trained
Volunteers are used.
Another Conference coming is "Teens In Stress" highlighted
by a Teleconference on October 28.
l�
2 _
3. Jerry. Knudson —Reported that they (staff and residents) are very happy with
the new prison facility. It is going real well there right
now. There are currently 93 residents. Regarding the old
site, the County apparently no longer is interested in using
it. The City is attempting to find a developer to transform
the area into possibly residential units of some type.
Most of the structures would be torn down to make room for
residences:._
4. Debbra Determan—was congratulated upon her recent marriage.
5. John Anderson' —Announced that Dean Colligan had resigned from the City
Council and they were looking for someone to replace him.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:55 A.M.
Re ctfully Su1bAmiitted,
George F. Muenchow,
Acting Secretary
CGS"P'ISSI01�'
u�GULrR SH KCPESESSIO^' r,.; MI�TNI
,,.ESOTti SFPTFP,'rER 4 , !986
Chairman Czaja called the meeting to order with Comm. Schmitt,
Foudray, VanDnaldeghem and Rockne present. Also present were
Judi Simac, City Planner; John Y. Anderson, City Administrator;
and Cncl. Lebens .
The agenda was approved as written with the ommission of the discussion
of Canterbury Park 2nd Addition, the representatives of Canterbury
Park were unable to attend.
The minutes of August 7, 1986 were approved as written.
PUBLIC HFARIP'G - Amend Conditional Use Permit X424
VanEaldeghem/Schmitt moved to open the public hearing to amend
Conditional Use Permit 1424 to construct a building addition in a
B-1 District upon the property located at 1266 E. lst Avenue .
Notion carried unanimously.
The City Planner stated that the applicant, American Legion Post #2 has
responded to the concerns of the Planning Commission. Pvalkerson
"iotors has submitted a letter to permit the parking of 60 vehicles
on their property during non business hours, this would bring the
total parking available to 137 spaces. The parking on the east
side of the lot where it abuts county road 17 will have plantings
along there to the height of 3 feet to conceal headlights from the
cars . The American Legion did propose to build a picket fence along
that area.
Discussion ensued on the landscaping and the 3 foot screening require-
ment. It was stated that shrubs and berming would be more suitable
than a picket fence . Chairman Czaja asked if there was anyone from
the audience who wished to address this issue . There was no response .
Schmitt/VanNaldeghem moved to close the public hearing. Motion
carried unanimously.
Foudray/Schmitt offered Conditional Use Permit Resolution 11424 and
moved for its adoption subject to the following conditions :
1. Screening and landscaping be completed before issuance
of the building permit for the addition.
2 . Compliance with the 299 person occupancy limit.
3 . The applicant get the signature of Al C. Fischer from
Malkerson Motors .
Motion carried unanimously.
Commissioner Pomerenke arrived and took his seat at 8 : 05 p.m.
PL,�r�Trr-r COr:T�1;IS:�IOr'
September 4, 19E6
age -2-
PUPLIC H EARIT'G - Rezoning of 71 .2 acres
Schmitt/Rockne moved to open the public hearing to consider the
rezoning of approximately 71 .2 acres of property located in Section ?,
Township 115P,, Range 221 , from Ag to R2 . T.�,ction carried unanimously.
The City Planner stated that the applicant has not yet submitted a
preliminary plat of the development area and an environmental Assess-
ment 'Worksheet must be performed. Chairman Czaja asked if there was
anyone from the audience who wished to address this issue . There
was not response .
Schmitt/Foudray moved to continue the public hearing for the
Jackson Business Park rezoning request to October 9, 1986 and move
its adoption. T.lotion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARfiG - Amendment to the City Code Section. 11,29, Subd.
Foudra� /po eru ke ved to o en the b11 c hhe iI
t c nsids r a
amendment o -,he Ci y Code , ectign, 1 .2 S 1
mini storage facilities as a conditional useuin� ��B-1 District.
Motion
NMotion carried unanimously.
The City Planner stated that the particular area where Tr. Marschall
would like to construct mini storage is u1. 3rd Avenue and at this
time there is not public sewer or water available . One of the options
would be to rezone just certain areas of the Bl for mini storage .
Comm. Schmitt stated that this particular piece of property has
severe geological problems in serving it with municipal utilities .
_.;iscussion ensued or_ the possibility of using economic development
tax increment distribution.
The applicant, Duane Marschall, stated that he would have no problem
with having a residence on the mini storage property.
Schmitt/Pomerenke moved to continue public hearing to October 9, 1986,
with direction to staff to resolve the issues of the estimated cost
and scope of project and the cost to all adjoining landowners and
what economic benefit there would be in the long term. Potion carried
unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARIF G - Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor stora e
VanYalde�hem/P,Qckne moved to open the public hearing to consider a
a reques for a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage of
transportation equipment upon the property located at 1803 Eagle
unanimously.
Creek Blvd. in a light industrial zoning district. Motion carried
Discussion ensued on exactly what kind of storage would be involved.
/ I'-',
September`
1 )
Page -'-
The applicant, Lester Koehnen, €304 1st Street, Shakopee , stated
the stora=ge could consist of an.+ftin.' from a- outboard motor to a
semi . It` is state 3 aw that j ung: vehicles must be stored 30 days .
There will be no wrecking on this site just storage .
Mr. Olson, 940 Eagle Creek, said that they propose to put as many
vehicles as they can within the fenced in area.
Yr. Schmitt, 1797 Eagle Creek Blvd. stated that he is against this
proposal, he believes it would be an eyesore to the residents
within the area.
Dave Yarusso , 1812 Eagle Creek Blvd. said that he does not feel
it would lower the property values .
Mr. Brown, 302 Shawnee Trail, stated that this is not a junk yard.
This is a towing and storage facility and it is an excellent service
for the city.
Chairman Czaja asked if there was anyone from the audience who
wished to address this issue . There was no response .
Foudray/Schmitt moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried
unanimously.
Foudray/Schmitt offered to grant Conditional Use Permit ;#471 and
move for its adoption based on the following recommendations :
1. The entire storage area must be entirely enclosed with
a solid fence 8 feet in height. The fence shall be set
back 30 feet from the rear property line and 10 feet
from side lot lines . lithin the setbacks a major deciduous
tree must be planted every 30 feet.
2 . All storage associated with the uses within the structure
must be contained within the fenced area.
Pomerenke/Rockne offered an amendment to the main motion that a
major coniferous tree , such as spruce or pine be planted every 15 feet
and with 6 foot height. Notion carried unanimously.
City Administrator stated that there should be a review of the
conditional use permit after one year.
Commissioner Foudray called the question. Call of the question
fails with Pomerenke and Czaja opposed.
Main motion dies because of lack of majority.
Schmitt/Rockne moved for a 5 minute recess . Motion carried
unanimously.
PLANNING COMMISSION
September 4 , 1986
Page -4-
Chairman Czaja called the meeting back to order.
Schmitt/Foudray moved to grant conditional use permit #471 for
purposes of operating an outdoor storage lot and for purposes
of operating an impound lot, and move its adoption, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The entire storage area must be entirely enclosed with
a solid fence 8 feet in height. The fence shall be
setback 10 feet from the rear and side lot lines. Within
the setbacks a major coniferous tree must be planted every
15 ft. at a minimum 6 ft. height.
2 . All storage associated with the uses within the structure
must be contained within the fenced area.
3 . Annual Planning Commission review.
Motion carried with Comm. Czaja opposed.
Foudray/VanMaldeghem moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 9 : 50 p.m.
Judi Simac
City Planner
Carol L. Schultz
Recording Secretary
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
DOWNTOWN AD HOC COMMITTEE
Shakopee, Minnesota
September 10, 1986
Chm. Laurent called the meeting to order at 7:40 a.m. with the following members
present: Terry Forbord,- Gary Laurent, Mike Sortum, Dan Steil, Jim Stillman, Bill
Wermerskirchen and Liaison Jerry Wampach. Absent: Don Martin, Joe Topic, Pete Sames,
Tim Keane and Mark Kuechenmeister. Also present were John Anderson, City Administrator;
Barry Stock, Administrative Aide; Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer and Dennis Kraft,
Community Development Director.
Terry Forbord/Jim Stillman moved to approve the agenda. Motion carried.
Terry Forbord/Bill Wermerskirchen moved to approve the minutes of the August 27, 1986
meeting. Motion carried.
The status of the streetscape petitions was discussed. At the present time 21. 1% of
the front footage of residential property and 33% of the front footage of commercial
property owner signatures have been received on the petition. The amount still needed
before presentation to the Council is 351 front feet. A letter from Anthony Berens
withdrawing his signature on behalf of Art Berens and Sons, Inc. for Lots 1, 2 & 3
and S. 102 feet of Lot 4, Block 22 from the streetscape improvement petition was
acknowledged. After reviewing the petition Berens Market doesn't feel they should
be penalized for prbviding off street parking for- their customers.
Barry Stock suggested the Committee members try to contact more property owners. He
provided them with a list of residential property owners and requested that the
petitions be returned to him by Friday, Sept. 12.
The merits of including scaled down streetscape elements on the Fourth Avenue Recon-
struction Project from Holmes to Scott were discussed. The consulting engineers are
now doing a study to establish costs for a scaled back type of proposal. A public
hearing is scheduled for Sept. 23, 1986 for the proposed streetscape improvements.
property owners would be assessed 25% of additional amenities such as trees, benches,
etc which are over and above the normal street improvements. This is an opportunity
for property owners to improve their property at 25% of the cost and it would also
tie in with the Downtown District improvements. It was noted that there are four
commercial properties that would be affected and it was suggested that a meeting be
held with these property owners to explain the project to them. Mike Sortum questioned
the timetable for the project and the benefits it might have for these properties.
Dan Steil left at 8: 45 a.m.
Terry Forbord /Jim Stillman moved that the Downtown Committee encourage doing a
feasibility study on the proposed improvements on Fourth Avenue and move forward
with the City Engineer to finish the study on the cost of these items. Motion carried.
Barry Stock submitted a parking plan for the downtown area for the Committee to review.
The plan designates parking for customers, 8 hour, 4 hour, 2 hour, 30 minute, 15
minute and permit parking. The Chief of police has reviewed the plan and has given
his approval.
Bill Wermerskirchen/Mike Sortum moved to approve the parking plan and recommend to the
City that the plan be implemented as soon as possible. Motion carried.
A letter of resignation from Mark Kuechenmeister was accepted. After being confronted
by two businessmen regarding his position on the downtown streetscape project he feels
it would be detrimental to his business to remain on the Committee.
The City Administrator wondered if there might be some value in meeting with
those who are opposed to the streetscape project. Barry Stock will work up a
fact sheet on the Downtown area streetscape to be sent out to property owners before
before small group meetings are held.
The next Downtown Committee meeting will be held September 24, 1986 at 7:30 a.m.
Further discussion ensued on how to assess vacant land and unoccupied property.
It was decided to discuss these issues in greater detail at our next meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 a.m.
Darleen Schess
Recording Secretary
/f
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Monthly Project Status Report
DATE: October 2 , 1986
Attached is the monthly project status report for September,
1986 . I wish to expand upon the status of a few projects as
information to the Council .
Timber Trails: This project includes the overlay portion of our
1986 pavement preservation program.
13th Avenue Mapping : There are meetings scheduled with all
affected property owners on October 7 , 1986 and tentatively for
November 6 , 1986. Hopefully this project can be completed this
winter.
Trail Clean—up Project: With the amount of rain this year, this
has been a very difficult project to complete . The trail is
again under water and the area has been wet most of the summer.
The project is close to being completed but there remains some
work behind the Rahr property and a low area to the west .
The following is an update on the costs incurred to date on the
project.
Construction Cost $1 ,268 .50
Engineering Cost $ 9140.00
Administration Cost $ 12 .68
TOTAL COST $2,221 . 18
We have received a contribution from the DNR in the amount of
$2,650 .00 . R.ahr Malting has indicated that they will be willing
to participate in the project for their area which is yet to be
completed.
KA/pmp
STATUS
G
i I
_ -
1
- 1 r
I 1 1 I I 1
1 I I 1
I I i I
, I 1
1 .
1 1
TZ
i I I 1 1
M i
S2 i
I ' ; •y � P 1 � 1 P 1 � � � ' ,
I I ,
I I I 1
I
1
_ 1 �
1 1 1 Gll O ' •� I V1 O .--. I
, 1 m
I I 1 I I I I
1 '
I
1 , I
v o i
I
I I 1
r i m i n
1 1
Y q C T
-- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- ------ -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- ------ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
_y
i
I 1 I 1 I I I
1 1 1 1 1
I I
1 I I I
I i 1 i
1 1 N 1 1 ul 1
1 i m I s i
i 1 P I
a 1 O
I I I r
1 1 i m 1 a i m
' cmrl i 1 i e i m
I I I I I 1
1 i i b I i
1 1 w a m m
c^mil i i to i a m i .-on i
I I I 1
I
I I
1 1 i 1 m 1 1 1 1
i I
in i i P I ; 1 ml I
I I I
I r I o
1
I I 1
I I 1 1 1 TI
1 1 1 y l
1 1 m 1 1 1
1 cll 1 Cml1 1 P 1 1 •�.. 1 1 1
I I I
I I r
- I 1
I a j L/1 611 1 N 1 1 I 1 1 l
I
I I
I I 1 1
- L
I
I I I I 1 1
1 1 1 0
1 1 1 1
va 1 m m 1 1 1 n 1 i m
m 1 1 i n r n
I I
I I I
I I I
I .e. CJI 1 G11 1 1 ; m I
I
I I 1
I r I 1
I I I 1 c
1
I 1 1 1 1 I
I GA 1
I I
a 1 cmil i cn i c\mil i i i m m
I I I 1
I I
I I
I I 1 1
I I I 1 1
1 I 1 1 = I
I 1 a i a
I 4mli+U I 1 1 C 1 ?J
I
I 1
I 1 I 1
I I I I 1
r I 1
r I I z o r ia 1 1
1 P S 1 1
1 I SII I 1 i
I
I I 1 m 1 O I
i i 1 Cl1 1 1 1
C
1
I
I
I
I I I r
I I '
I I I
I I 1
I I I 1
I I '
I 1 1 1
I
P 1 m 1
I I a � 1 2 1 O 1 •'O
I N 1
I 1
I I I
1 i m
I
I
r i i cmir i `i' I v, 1 y i 1
I
I I I
I 1
I I I 1
i r m
I I I I
I I I
1
I 1 I I I
i
T
1 •'•, Z -1
• ' i i a m ii
r I I I i
i
r I
1 I I
1 I
I I
I I '
I V i s i i
I I I I
i cmil 1 s
I
I i i i m
I I
I I I 1 N
I o` i i c ai z I
t _ ,
; ' I
I I I I
SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED
Public Finance Advisors
85 East Seventh Place,Suite 100
Saint Paul,Minnesota 55101.2143
612.223.3000 �..�
SEP 3 19x6
September 29, 1986 CITY CF
Mr. John Anderson, Administrator
Mr. Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
City Hall
129 East I st Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
RE: Advance Refunding of Tax Increment Financing Revenue Bond Issues
for the K-Mart and Canterbury Downs Districts
We have completed an estimate of the feasibility of advance refunding the
$4,200,000 Canterbury Downs Revenue Bonds and the $3,140,000 K-Mart
Revenue Bonds. The K-Mart issue has already been refunded once in 1984,
which, in both a legal and practical sense, limits the feasibility of a second
refunding. One additional practical limitation on advance refunding both
issues is that each issue requires the payment of a premium to the bondholder
if the bonds are prepaid. This premium causes a reduction in the interest cost
savings.
Schedule A is our estimate of advance refunding the Canterbury Downs issue.
The total front money requirement is $315,000, of which $420,000 is provided
by increasing the issue size. The City would be required to fund the remaining
$395,000. The result as shown in columns 8 and 9 is that the City's front
money is never fully recovered and the savings are negative.
Schedule B is a similar estimate for the K-Mart issue. The City's share of the
front money requirement is $400,000. The total savings are a negative
$1,207,592. 'However, through levy year 1996 the savings are projected to be
positive at approximately $I 10,000 per year. In 1997 through 2003 the savings
turn negative to approximately $340,000 per year. This turnabout is caused by
the statutory requirement of extending the average life of the issue five years
for a second advance refunding. The present value of this negative savings is a
minus $80,000.
The City will recall that in our revised projection of TIF funds for these
Districts sizeable surpluses were indicated in all years, with very significant
surpluses in the late 1990's through 2005. These estimated surpluses were
after funding of the storm sewer projects and the Downtown and Bridge
projects. The size of the annual residual surpluses is much larger than the
negative savings estimated in the later years of the advance refunding of the
K_Mart issue.
Therefore, although we cannot advocate the advance refunding of either of
these issues as they stand individually, the City may wish to discuss how the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota
September 29, 1956
Page 2
potential savings in the first ten years versus the negative savings in 1997-
2003 from advance refunding the K-Mart issue would affect the City's overall
objectives.
Please feel free to contact us should you have any questions regarding these
issues.
Respectfully,
VVM-L All J
n
7
David N. MacGillivray
Project Manager
/dlr
Enclosures
SCHEDULE A
l0 M
M l0
Ln
M
� F
w m
a W
o
W I 1 1 I I I I I I 01 E U
> Wccz
oorinor- oN MW1.
E+ z -- O .--i m Ln-,o .--i C N M 0 E+
r-7 > `-' Ln N r-1 1D m .1;m 1 m W 3 I-+
0 ¢ m mra r-+ rn %o-Ir .i z w x
£ m M r--1 r-I .-I r--I O z W
0
v as
E O O
z W W
O
I I a
W o O o Ln Ln o in Ln Ln to W
C7 O OONN Or r- r- N .L
Zm O MNMO" OLDNm M
Q.r `-'
x Ln 1D 1D Ln 10 Ln Ln Ln m
1O U m mNNNNNNN r-I
m 0 M ri V)-
a)
}m W
r
E-
00 oO d
ra a I I
a U
C)0 0 Ln 0 Ln Ln Ln Ln oC I � LnMM
a 0 Z OONNOrrr r OM 1 C Ln 10M
W V H &4 ,-. rCtnOrmMr M 010 I r d'
MZ E CO ► • I ►erO
F-I W •� r-I m M M N -4 m N M O C I m as r-I
G] H 0 mrmmmmrm Ln OC I O
E 0 x r r r r r r r r N N 1 0
a W W ► . 1
w E 1p C 1 N
V] V} V} V}
C7
0 Z "
a s o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o z 0 E+
r.Ca a o 00000000 0 � a cn
O:c u O
W E 1D a U
a }i O Ln C M m lO r 10 M r -4 O ••
a CO E m m o Ln Ln Ln 0 Ln Ln r U E >
M Lnrrrrrrr N Z E z E-
Z"
H Zi
10 o E; L-, a
ut z z 0
4 ' E
E-
E-
E, >4O o E U W rd
Z W o o O U Ga W W ••
a Z Ln0 — O O � w < U
w E Ln Ln m w 0 a
m m La m E z W ►-,
"' cMir J 3 z Oc a z
Eo1'
Ur do 3 00000000 O O1c 110 Ln MM
- 00000000 O o 10 11D d � M
z o 4 w
00 aC mNN r-INN.-i Q1 r OM 1 O O1
p Z W .. . . . . . ► . . I ► .CtD
Z 10Z E, CM M r-1r114mN 1c O O I r O
.7 4 Z mLn N m Ln Nmv Ln NLn 1 N N
Cu H r-d N N r-I r-I -4 N C M l 0
W rd V} I ►
rQ' a 1c ra I N 0
E m � V> M
O E m
m Zr-♦ .. m
E
1.1
z7- m 4 *• 00000000 0 •• 0 E
z W W a 0 O o o 0 0 o o o Cl Z W to
a • 10 10 W o0000000 o x0 V
£ U a co co V M a 00 Ln Ln O Ln O Ln O a 3 •' II
zw mm z --m
OCl
Ix O w Mr -4O MI N �H
W
a Ln
Ln Ln Ln 10 10 1 r o 10 .] Z E M Z a
arxrn a v Za a0
O E D \\\ V}
00 0 0
34 Z N N w >+ i-r W
4 00 -4-4w W
E E �
Z x00010 1-1 NMC - • U a £ ~
N O mmmmmm0lm 0 E w r� 0
•w C7 •• a -- E m m m m m m m m •• Cw w w
wO0 •• z W 1-Iri1-4W � aU
01No W w D >4 --z Ln lormm0riN cncn Oa
.> E O E > O m m m m m m m m E 0 0 E z W
a d W 4 J < W a m m m m m m m m O a W O >
2 v}a 0 U E ..] W r-I rl r4 rl r4 r4 -L r-4 E a s Z m 4 Z
SCHEDULE B
00
M l0
Q\ O
01 O
N r-I
� E
W y
a w
o ..
w I I 1 1 1 1 aE U
> rn O Oto0000MkDITNOwmm WNNNN W W z
.-1 U O s to ON am mm 1-1C N0000m -W0101
E Z ^ O ln0rMO� N rulNmruleTOMarrir� tn 0 E
,.] > v r LO r-
0
O alr rm QU 0 -4N MV 0r- MM LnWN X00 z W X
V' ri r-1N Mln 10r 0001 M -0 -4 r-11n M 0z W
U E O O
Z W W
O
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I a
W O Ol111n000MMmmmm0000000 N W
U ^ O 1D 01 d'N NVQ OONNrmOOLn lfl tf1 U10 01
Zm O v 1n10101oM Lnwm .o�Omr.-ad' �Om �O0-w Ln
y v O r 1 er rl la O r r O O N rl m m r c; r
lO U O to r-i O r4 r-I r-1 O O r-1 r-I ri r-i M M M v v
00 0 N N -I 1--1 r-1-4 r-1 r-1 -I r-1 r'-0 r'1 M M M M M M M N
01 w ►
ra E 1-4
.a
r� odP
1-1 a I I
a o1rl �n000Mrl00000000000000o m o0 1 m 10rLn
u1
Ix z 10 Q1 vN rat 0 L r-r,NM O Oc I t0 V rM
W U I , E 011n 1001 m r-1 Nr OmN Ln m 010 1 N M
InCLnm1ortotom1orm r-I Lf10 110 0 4
W 0 O» -0-0av -Wvvvvv -4 00 1 0 ry
E O N C-4 1
d W W I
W E to M I N
U � V)- v} �
U
O Z
W "
a so 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Z O E-
4
4 n. J o 0000 U) Lntnu 0M Lnln0000Lnln0 0 " a w
acn a ^ o LnV Ln m 0
M
a O O mrl ram �n lorrrloclo oomrONmN O1 O
p1 y E O MMCMMMMMMMMMMMMV1v -4 UE �
sF N MM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM 'O� z E E-
0
0 E 1+ a
v} Z4H •• E
E E FC
U) . V a
E„ >, o O E U W
Z W O o O U W W W ••
OZLr) O o 04 W >4UU
DW 1: o wcn 0a
DW E o
O o cn w E z w 1-1
-, c ww w 0 >
V). a z m 2 z
dp
E
aoav) 0000000000000000000 0 00 I 0 orM
04 w 0000LntnLnU) 0 n000000 Ln 0 0�o 1 �o Lnrr-1
[T] 00 a V' In O O M N m r M V N M r- -4 v 10 m 100 v� v1 OM i m �r-ir
0 Z W ` . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Z rz E 001-'1 r-I M in 110 r r r lO V r4 CO MrONM N m 1n 01I M m -4
w 4 4 z M M MNr1001mr10Lf)CN1-101m�10d' N -4 0101 1 r4 M
> '.0 H N N N N N -4 -4 -4 r-1-4-41-1 -4 r N N I M
u1 I
w 00 ry I M O
4arn u} o
E r 0
O E
W W w 17 #
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O •• co E L
zwa a A 00000000000000000 o zwo O
1-. aw 1010 � ^ w 00000000000000000 o x U
E U w mm UM a
n0z -
o a $ •• u
ol000000000000
z 0) o1
.-1 F-1 'J 1-i r-1 N M -W In 10 r m m.-1 N IV 10 m Q1 N O
w N a a .--I ri ri r-4 -Ori -4-4 r-1 r♦ NNNNNNM M 6-1 z E rEr Z
w X o 1-I -4 -4a w ri z a � a 0
aaz a v} 00 00
0E m N N N yi r-1 W •
' • E U
ul
< o ra ra w H u a E
y O U >+ -� Z rm0101--INM� tfl tOrm0101-1 N MCS
V) O Z 1Q' N O w m 00010101 Q1010101010101000000 0 E w w W
01010101010101010101010101000000 •• 0
[z� O 0 •• z W -4 1--I -4 ri r♦ r-1 .--I 14 -4 -4-4-41--I N N N N N
r�
OO z0 IX E-
O wm 0 � ^ Z In10rm010riNM.W korm010 -4NM m V)
-Gu E O E >-4 O m o0 00 00 00 0, 0 01 0, 01 01 c O1 rn rn o 0 0 o E D O E Z W
Ix M W FC r] 4 W a 01 01 0. M M O1 01 O1 01 01 01 01 Q1 01 Q1 O O O O O ] �] W 0 >
y VTa 0u 6.3 W 14 -4 -4r4-4 ra ra r4 r4 r-4 N N E a a Z CO 4 z
L S N V 1 m N N f D O
> h N m O l—
N
m—0 r� m C, 0,'S'D O
E~'n 8^om�m°'m���� EXHIBIT I
--N N N�-;r•;.7.7 S m S S u u'1 c m 0, 9/A/./Ol
U us 04 00
00
�DNO V u1
O ^
C� _-.� Nna�D�D�D N�n_MMOmM—O�DOMn a
QNO amvaMMMMn vvdan�Omo.-- o�
N
-----------------
O
N M r:O,n a%CO m m m m m m n O i
10 .7 T
O O N M N S O I i S S N Ili 1%C n O 0 n O s37
•� a�D U1 M_1� '
O'D�O�D D`m m 'D NM.D S O_
�n
U 61
v ppp � E
Z G 0�S m Ili lD lD lllD Ili
l �D n
`^ d NS.D—__—__•Q O�ID�n i ID 1
`: u D a0ovoo -maN - v
Z � `NMav+.n
o3 E
O o O o i
uE
N of M v1�D�n M O m O M u'f m m m m m m m v O
ty NnaOa,Nva r� E.V Nv Dpm mo,nLn .D p m
O ... Nmo�_�oa—n— om"
() H
d—ONO aNm—te r.r�v'f�n In00000 v %
O
O u
O C v1SN O S V O�o�Cli . I I ...
C. C� a.� NMSanM—v�Mv.D�Da—dMrtMMM d O 00
LM
U � �,r = �y .-m.o.o�o.D�D.Ov�NNNo.o.o.__--- o• � of °p O L
O � to v, -• � O � �
i " V
C
O'.L - -
v y M O C m m O mm O C r
W X C op I Immmv n�nv�i o E
fel C Qp y ;1
.-
C
S�Q
Z 4 p N an
a_O oI--OI N �o d v pl
wOHO,(11 10
U '✓ ^ N'f S—N M D 1 n 0 m OV'1 N N
V.o S-S
X
H Q N Vf C y C�
u
O
J 1 ; MMn MMMMM MMMMMn!'1 R 1 P'f M N y y M ^
v'f ^Z MnMne-+nr�MMMe-Ine-le-�nnne� M y C a
G N. tm
C v+o.—NNnv,nn55�� 55��55��QQQQ55��5Q�55��QQ5Q� n .0.� ` L � C
�` oNOMco= mo25 �52525252525�5r525 m °i L e
X r N
G v d o.SMN Om�DaN O OO M d m s r 4
�,�aaaa8S�80�88888 C
mmmmmmm o, -
.- y
X � N N y� �►• w p d
4A
�
DO�mm Omm —NV1N
y n v 1 O m n_�D m S b N N O N O O L p r
G � l
4 O > e�
T C O
y A
y° $ M
iv y d k K M k =*t v
= 0� h � � til LL7 LL1 til �i7 g
G cc CN.o aoM.ac0-1CNCNC.,, NQ^o U F " '�' y oVi oVi m of �
o v o 0 0 0 ono 0 0 0 0 o m 8 N O o C C y tn
y u --------------����
to�O N m O,O—fV M S V1\D N m D\ NMS O
} O m m m m o�0.of O.of O�T o�T O" H 1 "'� •1 •1 ^ 1 •1 "� =
o 5888
d
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: 1987 Projections for Taxing Districts
DATE: October 3, 1986
The Council asked for information as to what the School and County were
looking at for taxes for 1987. Neither have taken final action nor are
predicting what their mill rate will end up being. However, the levy for the
budgets that they are currently looking at is;
1985/86 levy Est. increase _1986/87 levy 1986 mill 1987 mill
City $1,489,535 (5.6%) $1,406,000 17.4 18.5?
School $5,833,605 7.7%
$6,282,793 60.3 65-72?
County $11,459,559 17g
$13,407,684 35.8 ?
17
Minutes
Industrial Commercial Commission
Shakopee, Minnesota September 10, 1986
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bud Berens
Jane DuBois
Al Furrie, Chairman
Tim Keane
Donald Koopman
MEMBERS ABSENT: John Manahan
Jim O'Neill
STAFF PRESENT: Barry Stock, Administrative Aide
John K. Anderson, City Administrator
Dennis Kraft, Community Development Director
Chairman Al Furrie called the meeting to order at 5: 20 p.m. and
roll call was taken.
Minutes
On a motion by Tim Keane, seconded by Jane DuBois, the minutes of
the June 11, 1986 meeting were approved.
Star City Labor Survey
Staff presented the numerical results of the labor survey that
was sent to Shakopee residents through the utility bills this
past Spring. Mr. Stock informed the Committee that he would be
drafting a report which would clarify the results of the labor
survey. At this time, staff reported that they had not drawn any
firm conclusions from the survey results. Mr. Stock stated that
the complete labor survey and report would be completed by
October 1, 1986 .
Comm. DuBois then questioned when the City would receive Star
City designation. Mr. Stock suggested that the Committee review
the Star City Program time schedule that staff had included in
the agenda packet. Mr. Stock stated that the labor survey as
mentioned earlier would be completed by the first of October.
The industry visitation program is scheduled for completion in
late October. Upon receipt of the industry visitation program
survey results, staff will be analyzing the results and
completing a report on the economic status of the industries
within Shakopee ' s Industrial Park. Upon completion of the
industry visitation program and report, staff will be compiling
all the necessary components of the Star City Program and putting
them into one comprehensive report. Staff hopes to have this
report completed by December lst. Staying on the time schedule
as discussed would allow for the presentation portion of the
program to be completed in late December or early January.
Assuming the acceptance of our report and presentation, it is
likely that the City would receive actual Star City designation
in February of 1987 .
Comm. DuBois questioned whether or not the time schedule could be
pushed up so that we might receive Star City designation yet this
year. Mr. Stock stated that with limited staff resources he
doubted that the time schedule could be pushed up in any way.
Discussion ensued on the value of completing the Star City
program process and the potential economic impact that it may
have on our community.
Industry Visitation Program Survey
Mr. Stock presented to the Committee the industry visitation
program survey that will be mailed to all the industries in the
industrial park. Mr. Stock informed the Committee that each
survey sent out will be followed up by a personal visit by either
the Community Development Director or himself. It is the hope of
staff that a personal visit will guarantee completion of the
survey.
Downtown Streetscape Project
Mr. Stock presented the Downtown Streetscape Improvement time
schedule to the Committee for their information. John Anderson,
City Administrator, then explained the Downtown Streetscape
Project in detail and it ' s potential effect on the community.
Other Business
Chairman Furrie questioned the status of the Industrial
Commercial Commissions reorganizational plan that had been
discussed earlier this year. Mr. Stock stated that the
reorganization hinged on the City' s hiring of additional staff.
Chairman Furrie suggested that regardless of the staffing
considerations, it might be appropriate for the ICC Committee to
review the reorganizational plan and begin thinking of who might
serve on the various sub-committees that were discussed at
earlier meetings of the Commission. Mr. Stock stated that he
would put the ICC reorganizational plan on the October agenda for
the Commissions review and comment.
Comm. Berens inquired whether or not a development corporation
was one of the necessary components of receiving Star City
designation. Staff responded in the affirmative. Mr. Berens
went on to say that the development corporation had recently sold
it ' s last piece of property and that it was time to get some new
people involved in the corporation. Chairman Furrie concurred
with Mr. Berens remarks and suggested that the development
corporation consider some type of stock redemption program this
year. Mr. Stock requested Mr. Berens to notify him of the
development corporations next meeting so that a City staff
representative might attend.
On a motion by Jane DuBois, seconded by Tim Keane, the ICC
meeting adjourned at 6 : 15 p.m.
TENTATIVE AGENDA
Downtown Ad Hoc Committee
City Hall Council Chambers
October 8 , 1986
Chrmn. Laurent Presiding
1. Call to order at 7 : 30 A.M.
2 . Approval of Agenda
3 . Approval of the minutes - October 1, 1986
4 . Downtown Parking Lot Assessment Policy
5. Informational Items:
A. Downtown Group Meetings - Final Schedule
B. City Hall Siting Committee - Verbal Update
C. Merchants Hotel - Verbal Update
6 . Other Business
A.
B.
7 . Adjourn
Barry A. Stock
Administrative Aide
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING
PLEASE CALL BARRY OR TONI TO LET THEM KNOW
l �
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
DOWNTOWN AD HOC COMMITTEE
Shakopee, Minnnesota
October 1, 1986
Chm. Laurent called the meeting to order at 7 : 40 a.m. with the
following members present: Terry Forbord, Gary Laurent, Jim
Stillman, Joe Topic, Pete Sames, Bill Wermerskirchen and Liaison
Jerry Wampach. Absent: Don Martin, Mike Sortum, Dan Steil and
Tim Keane. Also present were John Anderson, City Administrator;
Dennis Kraft, Community Development Director; Barry Stock,
Administrative Aide; Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer, Ray Siebenaler
and Beth Moe, Shakopee Valley News.
Terry Forbord/Joe Topic moved to approve the agenda. Motion
carried.
Terry Forbord/Jim Stillman moved to approve the minutes of the
September 24 , 1986 meeting. Motion carried.
A lengthy discussion was held on defining parking lots and
determining a fair and equitable way to assess those lots which
are paved and designated for patrons.
�- --Prlte native Assessment Strategies were:
1. Maintain status quo
2 . Eliminate assessments for parking lots and spread out
over remaining downtown properties.
3 . Reduce assessable percentage on the parking lot area
( from 25% to 15% for example) and spread the difference
out over the remaining downtown properties. Parking lot
areas to be reviewed on an annual basis during the
assessment schedule
Staff recommended alternative #3 .
Joe Topic asked what would happen if only street rehabilitation
costs are assessed with the streetscape assessment spread over
the rest of the City. The City Administrator ' s reaction was that
if the proposed streetscape improvements bring additional
business in, the property owner should pay something for it. The
Committee ' s recommendation will still have to go to City Council
who might view it differently.
Gary Laurent commented that the Committee is making its best
effort to make downtown improvements a reality and he
recognizes they will have to be flexible. He also requested the
Community Development Director to show what effect a 150
assessment would have on a specific piece of property as opposed
to 250. The result was that a $19 , 563 . 00 assessment would be
reduced to $14 , 672 . 00 .
Terry Forbord/Bill Wermerskirchen moved that the Committee table
discussion on assessments for patron parking lots and direct
staff to create a definition of what constitutes a parking lot in
the legal sense. Motion carried.
The next item was to consider an assessment policy for buildings
unfit for human occupancy. Property falling into this category
include the Kallivig House, House of Hoy/Jabberwocky and the
Pelham (Merchants) Hotel. The City is presently negotiating on
the Hoy property and the Kallevig property which fall into this
category. Several assessment strategies were presented. Staff
recommended the status quo option because it might give the
impression that the City advocates poor property maintenance if
an assessment break is given.
Ray Siebenaler stated that he had furnished parking for several
businesses for many years when he was operating the hotel.
Several buyers have looked at the hotel but he has no current
prospects. He also stated that several agencies had informed him
over the past 25 years that his property would be more valuable
if the building was torn down. At that time he was not ready to
sell, but now he is.
John Anderson left at 8: 30 a.m.
Jim Stillman/Pete Sames moved to apply the same assessment
criteria for assessing buildings unfit for human occupancy as
will be used for assessing vacant lots.
The Community Development Director noted that there had been
several developers looking at the hotel building but it needs
extensive remodeling. He intends to look into the feasibility of
re-applying for a block grant. He went on to explain that
Shakopee doesn' t have a very good chance because of the strong
competition for grant money which has been cut.
The question was called on the motion. Motion carried with
Wermerskirchen and Forbord opposed.
Terry Forbord/Bill Wermerskirchen moved to request the City to
look into the feasibility of acquiring Merchants Hotel. Motion
carried.
Mr. Ashfeld informed the Committee that the 2nd Avenue parking
lot should be completed this week with the street lighting
elements added later this fall.
Small group meetings on the downtown improvement projects have
been tentatively rescheduled for Tues. Oct. 14 , Mon. Oct. 20 and
Wed. Oct. 22 at 7 p.m.
The Downtown Committee ' s next meeting will be held Oct. 8 at 7 : 30
a.m.
Mr. Stock presented a Landscape Design Plan for the Stans House
in Block 31. It is the intention of the Stans Foundation to
cover the total cost of the project.
Terry Forbord moved that if the Stans Foundation wants to move
forward and implement their plan and use approved streetscape
amenities we would eliminate them from the streetscape assessment
role. Motion failed.
Joe Topic/Bill Wermerskirchen recommended that staff go along
with the Stans Foundation project if the project is compatible
with our design. Motion carried
Discussion followed with the consensus being that if the Stans
Foundation proceeds with all the streetscape elements the
Downtown Committee would consider excluding this property for
streetscape assessment purposes.
The City Hall Siting Committee will meet on Monday, October 6th
at 6 : 30 p.m. in the Council Chambers and the Downtown Committee
is invited to be present.
Terry Forbord/Jim Stillman moved to adjourn at 9 : 15 a.m.
Darleen Schesso
Recording Secretary
TENTATIVE AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular Session Shakopee, MN October 9 , 1986
Chairman Czaja Presiding
1. Roll Call at 7: 30 P.M.
2 . Approval of Agenda
3 . Approval of September 4 , 1986 Minutes
4 . 7 : 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider a request for a
Conditional Use Permit to conduct a home occupation selling
novelty balloons upon the property located at 737 W. 6th
Ave. in a R-2 zoning district.
Applicant: Larry Severson
Action: Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 472
5. 7: 40 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider an
amendment to the City Code, Section 11. 29 , Subd. 3 which
would allow mini storage facilities as a conditional use in
the the B-1 District.
Action: Recommendation to City Council
6 . 7: 50 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider the
rezoning of approximately 71. 2 acres of property located in
Section 7, Township 115N, Range 22W, from Ag to R-2.
Action: Recommendation to City Council
7 . 8 : 00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an amendment to
Section 12. 11 of the Subdivision ordinance to amend the
P.U.D. regulations.
Action: Recommendation to City Council
8 . Discussion: Canterbury Park 2nd Addn.
9 . Informational:
a) Appeal of Koehnen C.U.P. to Council
b) Annual C.U.P. reviews
10. Other Business
11. Adjourn
Judi Simac
City Planner
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
TENTATIVE AGENDA
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS
Regular Session Shakopee, MN October 9 , 1986
Chairman Czaja Presiding
1. Roll Call at 7: 30 P.M.
2 . Approval of Agenda
3 . Approval of September 4 , 1986 Minutes
4. Other Business
5 . Adjourn
Judi Simac
City Planner
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
TENTATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 7 , 1986
Mayor Reinke presiding
1] Roll Call at 7 :00 P.M.
2] Recess for H.R.A. meeting
3] Reconvene
4] Reading by Mayor Reinke of City' s Non-Discrimination Policy
5] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers
6] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS
71 Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterick are
considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by
one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items
unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will
be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal
sequence on the agenda. )
*81 Approval of minutes of September 16th and 23rd, 1986
91 Communications : (Items noted for consent will be received and filed)
*a] Ray Siebenaler re : Council vacancy
*b] Dolores Morke re : Council vacancy
c] League of Mn. Cities Policy Adoption Meeting November 20th
*d] Alan E . BreuVkerp�re : Council vacancy
10] Public Hearings: D� : c'e
a] 7 : 30 P.M. Continuation of public hearing from September 23rd
on the proposed improvements to 13th Avenue from CR-89 to
the East corporate limits 1986-9
b] 7 : 30 P.M. Appeal of Planning Commission approval of a conditional
use permit for outdoor storage of transportation equipment in
the I-1 zone for Les Koehnen at 1803 Eagle Creek Blvd .
c] 8 :00 P .M. Hearing to consider the suspension or revocation of
beer and liquor licensees not in compliance with the city code
111 Boards and Commissions: None
121 Reports from Staff: [Council will take a 10 minute break around 9 :001
a] Prairie House 1st Addition - Park Dedication
b] Canterbury Downs nighttime racing at the track - on table
*c] Police Station Roof
delete -- d] Cancellation of Tax Increment Financing District No 5
e] Employment Agreement with Administrative Intern
f] Status change - Dorothy McPherson
*g] Buy-Back of Police Holiday Time
*h] Sidewalk maintenance on Marschall Road
i] Holmes Street Lateral Project 1986-3 Change Order No . 3
,zoo-ejgSTuzwpy �4TD
uos.zapuV •x uuor
'W' d OO: L Ole 986T ITE, ,zago4o0 `Supsony oq u,anoCpV [ST
[p
[o
[q
:ssauzsng ,zag40 EVT
L86T uz aTgT40GTTOD `,�naq xes 986T 2�uzno,zddV `fi89Z ' ON ' sGH [�
sanssl puog pa40aTas JOJ aozn,zaS ggaQ .zoj
x-es V ,,�naZ 04 4oN ,zo4TpnV f,4unoo au4 2uz40aila ` 9892 ' oN 'sa2i [i
f,4Tjog4nV 4uawdoTanapa'd pine 2uzsnoH
auq fq xes T-ezoadS V jo J�Aaq auk off. 2uzWasuo0 ` gs9Z "ON •saU [a
sa2pnr uoz40aTg JO quaw4uzoddV ` Zs9z *ON •0011 [p#
TOT HZ uo saoznaQ
TOJWO0 ozJ.I-eJs apzno.zd 04 IOQ uW at44 fUT4sanbGd ` T89Z ' oN 'saU [3*
sTTOE xes 044 uo UOT40GTTOD JOJ
STTT9 )�4TTT4 l a2uuTuJG quanbuzTGG 23UT, ,JT4,za0 `8892 *ON 'sag [q
.zanzg GLI4 Jo L14JON UNG aq4 Sq pauMo �gjadojd
uo $uzqunH 2uzpieSGE apo0 j�qz0 aq4 2utpuaury `GOZ ' ON -PJO [u
: saou-Cuzp. O pu-e suoz4nTosag [£T
88'98T `OST$ 30 4unoum uT sTTTq JO T-eAOjddy [T
q-oaCo.zd AUTJGAO anuaAV ggOT [x
squawano,zdwl Suzsso,za PuOJTTuU Er
:panuT4uoo jje4S wojj s4,zodad [ZT
-Z- a8ud
986T ` G jago4o0
YQNHOX HAAIIVINHI
TENTATIVE AGENDA
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota
Regular Session October 7, 1986
Chairman Wampach presiding:
1. Roll Call at 7 : 00 p.m.
2. Approval of Minutes of September 2, 1986
3 . Set Tax Levy for 1987
4. Decertify Tax Increment District #5
5 . Satisfaction of Mortgage - Lots 8 & 9 , Block 3
Maceys Second Addition
6. Request to Acquire Property (P/O Lot 2 and Lots 3 & 4,
Blk 3 , Original Plat
- Merchants Hotel)
7 . Other Business
8 . Adjourn
Dennis R. Kraft
Executive HRA Director
f
=ROUrsy ,rlr-^. m`�, ,r^T '^ nr."1 DL'T�E7`7T OTDT.y'. m `�Trm,�C mV
E .xS O _ "OTT T1 - 117 _ �._. . . _
SPECIAL SLaSIOP., OrZi, I.'1ZESO?'A 2� lo?ti
Chairman 'Vampach called the meeting to order a'. 7 :02 p.m. with
Comm. Leroux, `y'ierling and Lebens -resent. Also present were
John K. Anderson, City Administrator; Dennis Kraft, executive
Director; Julius A. Coller TI, City Attorney; Ken Ashfeld, Cita
Engineer; Judi Simac, City Planner; Judith �D . Cox, City Clerk ;`
and Tv'ayor Reinke .
i,eroux/Lebens moved to accept Special Session call . Aotion
carried unanimously.
Vierling/Leroux moved to approve the minutes of August 19, 1986.
Yotion carried with Corin. Lebens abstaining.
Leroux/i,Tierling offered Resolution No . 86-10, a Resolution of the
Board of Commissigners of the Shakopee HRA Adopting a Set of
Property Acquisition Policies and Procedures and move its adoption.
Roll. Call : Ayes : Comm. �Jampach, Leroux, Vierli ng
P'oes : Comm. Lebens
1: otion carried.
Discussion ensued on the acquisition of the Herrgott Property,
located at 111 E. 1st Avenue . It was the consensus of the
Commission that at this time purchase of the Herrgott property
is not warranted.
Leroux/Lebens moved to respectfully inform Vs . Herr-ott that the
City is not interested in acquiring her property at this time .
Motion carried unanimously.
Lebens/Leroux moved to adjourn to September 16, 1986. Motion
carried unanimously.
Carol L. Schultz
Recording Secretary
�3
MEMO TO: Shakopee HRA
FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, Executive Director
RE: 1987 Tax Levy Resolution
DATE: October 2 , 1986
Introduction and Background:
Attached is Resolution Number 86-11 which requests the
Shakopee City Council to consent to the tax levy for the HRA.
The levy is the one third of a mill allowed which is estimated at
$25 , 000 .
Alternatives:
1. Approve resolution number 86-11.
2 . Do not approve resolution number 86-11.
Recommendation:
Alternative number 1.
Action Requested:
Offer Resolution Number 86-11.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-11
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSENT
TO THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX BY THE HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Shakopee was created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.411 et. seq. ,
as amended, and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 1965, Section 462.545 designates all the
territory within the area of operation of the authority as a taxing district
for the prupose of levying and collecting a special benefit tax, and
WHEREAS, Section 462.462.545 states that the special levy shall not exceed 10
cents on each $100 of taxable valuation in the area of operation, and
WHEREAS, MSA 273.1102 states that any tax rate shall not exceed 33.33 percent
of such maximum tax rate specified by law or charter.
WHEREAS, Section 462.545 states that the governing body of the municipality
must give its consent to such a tax levy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY OF
THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
hereby requests the City Council of the City of Shakopee to consent to the
special tax levy of $25,000 payable 1987 by the Housing and Redevlopment
Authority in and for the City of Shakopee.
Adopted in session of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment
Authority of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
1986.
Chairman
ATTEST:
Executive Director
Approved as to form this
day of 1986.
City Attorney
MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Alun hority (HRA) ]
FROM: Dennis R. Kraft, Executive Director a�
RE. Termination and Decertification of Tax Increment
Financing District Number 5 Within Minnesota River
Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project Number 1
DATE: October 3 , 1986
i
Introduction•
The purpose of this resolution is to decertify and terminate
Tax Increment Financing District Number 5 .
Background:
The HRA established Tax Increment Financing District Number
5 on August 7, 1984. Since that date, Tax Increment District
Number 5 has not generated any tax-increment income and it is not
anticipated to do so in the foreseeable future. It is therefore,
prudent, at this time for the HRA to take the necessary steps to
terminate and decertify Tax Increment Financing District Number
5 .
Alternatives:
1. Approve the attached resolution.
2 . Do not approve the attached resolution.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted.
Requested Action:
Move to adopt Resolution # 86-12 which will terminate and
decertify Tax Increment Financing District Number 5 .
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for
the City of Shakopee, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 86-12
Resolution Terminating and Decertifying
Tax Increment Financing District No. 5
Within Minnesota River Valley
Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1
IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners (the
"Board" ) of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for
the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the "HRA" ) , as follows :
1. Recitals.
(a ) On August 7 , 1984 , the HRA' s Tax Increment
Financing District No. 5 was approved and established
within the HRA' s Minnesota River Valley Housing and
Redevelopment Project No. 1.
(b) The HRA' s redevelopment objectives pursuant
to which the HRA established Tax Increment Financing
District No. 5 , as amended, have been met or amended.
( c ) Due to change in use of the property within
Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 or other factors ,
Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 has to date
generated no tax increment income to the HRA and is
not expected to in the future.
(d) The Board finds that it would be in the
best interest of the HRA to terminate and decertify
Tax Increment District No. 5 .
2 . Termination of Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 .
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273 . 71 through
273 . 78 , hereby terminates the HRA' s Tax Increment Financing
District No. 5 within the HRA' s Housing and Redevelopment Project
No. 1 , effective on this 7th day of October, 1986 . The officers
of the HRA are hereby authorized and directed to forward a certified
copy of this resolution to the Scott County Auditor together
with a written request that the Scott County Auditor terminate
and decertify Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 in the
books and records of the County in accordance with this
resolution. Further, the officers of the HRA and the HRA' s
special redevelopment counsel, O ' Connor & Hannan, are authorized
and directed, in accordance to this resolution, to make necessary
and appropriate deletions and amendments to the HRA' s Modified
Housing and Redevelopment Plan for Minnesota River Valley Housing
and Redevelopment Project No. 1 , as amended 'and restated on
June 3 , 1986 .
Adopted this 7th day of October, 1986 .
CERTIFICATE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
TbP undersigned,, being the duly appointed and acting
Executive Director of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
in and for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the "HRA" ) , hereby
certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a
resolution duly adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the
Authority at a duly called and regularly held special or regular
meeting thereof, at which a quorum was present and voting through-
out, on October 7 , 1986 .
WITNESS my hand as such Executive Director this day
of October, 1986 .
Executive Director
Housing and Redevelopment Authority
in and for the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota
*s
MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA)
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Administrative Aide
RE: Satisfaction of Mortgage for Lots 8 & 9 , Block 3
Macey' s Second Addition
DATE: September 29 , 1986
Introduction:
In the Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization
Project the HRA provided lots to lower-income families
conditioned on those families continuing to reside in the homes
purchased for at least five years. Residence for a shorter
period would require prorata repayment of the lot value.
Background:
Gene and Barbara Potthier of Lot 8, Block 3 , Macey' s Second
Addition and Dean and Ingeborg Brunkow of Lot 9 , Block 3 , Macey' s
Second Addition have met the five year requirement of the
promissory notes that were executed September 29, 1981.
Requested Action:
To authorize appropriate HRA officials to execute and
deliver Satisfaction of Mortgages to Gene and Barbara Potthier
for the property located on Lot 8, Block 3 , Macey' s Second
Addition and to Dean and Ingeborg Brunkow for the property
located on Lot 9 , Block 3 , Macey' s Second Addition.
#(
MEMO TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA)
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Administrative Aide
RE: Acquisition of the Merchants Hotel - 221 E. Second Ave.
DATE: October 2, 1986
Introduction•
Mr. Ray Siebenaler, owner of the Merchants Hotel has
approached the Downtown Committee and has indicated his interest
in the City' s acquisition of his property.
Background:
On July 31, 1985 an inspection of the Merchants Hotel was
conducted by the Shakopee Building Inspector, Minnesota Division
of Hotels and Motels and the Shakopee Police Department. During
this inspection numerous fire code, electrical code, building
code and hotel statute violations were discovered. As a result
of this inspection, the property was declared unfit for human
occupancy on August 1, 1985. Since that time the property has
been vacant. On October 1, 1986, Mr. Siebenaler appeared before
the Downtown Committee to question what the City' s intentions
were in regard to his property. At that time, Mr. Siebenaler was
informed by City staff that the City did not have any plans for
his property, but that if he was interested in selling the
property to the City, the City may be interested in acquiring it.
Mr. Siebenaler responded that at this time the property was a
financial burden to him and he was interested in selling it to
the City if they were interested. The Downtown Committee then
moved to recommend to the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment
Authority that an appraisal be ordered on the Merchant Hotel
property.
The consensus of the Downtown Committee Members present at
the meeting was that the ultimate purpose for this property would
be additional parking space. This would call for the demolition
of the property by either the property owner or the City of
Shakopee. The Merchants Hotel is currently listed on the
National Register of Historical places and as such could be
demolished by the property owner or the City. Estimated
demolition cost for this property range from between $45 ,000 to
$60 ,000 .
Mr. Siebenaler informed the committee that he has had his
property listed for two years and several potential developers
have expressed interest in the rehabilitation of the structure.
However, most of these proposals have fallen through because the
rehabilitation costs estimates have been very high. The Shakopee
Building Inspector estimates that it would cost between $225,000
and $275 ,000 to simply bring the building up to code.
Funding for the acquisition of the property in question
could come from two sources. First, the HRA fund balance
presently amounts to approximately $150 , 000. These dollars could
be used for a portion of the acquisition costs. A second source
of funding would be tax increment financing.
The estimated appraisal cost for this piece of property is
$2, 000 . If the HRA feels that there would be a benefit to the
City from acquiring the property in question, it would be
appropriate at this time to authorize the appropriate city
officials to order an appraisal.
Alternatives:
1. Move to order an appraisal of the property known as the
Merchants Hotel at a cost not to exceed $2 , 000.
2. Do not order an appraisal of the property and respectfully
inform Mr. Siebenaler that the City is not interested in
acquiring his property at this time.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends alternative #1.
Action Requested:
Move to order an appraisal of the property known as the
Merchants Hotel at a cost not to exceed $2, 000. Funds for said
appraisal to be allocated from the HRA reserve fund.
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF 7M, CITY
COUNCIL jay
AAT: REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 16, 1986
Mayor Reinke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Cncl. Leroux,
Lebens, Vierling and Wampach present. Also present were John K. Anderson,
City Administrator; Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer; Gregg Voxland, Finance
Director; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; Dennis Kraft, Community Development
Director; and Julius A. Coller II, City Attorney.
Liaison Reports were given by councilmembers. Cncl. Leroux said that he
attended the Shakopee Community Services Board meeting and said there seems
to be a problem with pull tabs in certain liquor establishments. 'There
was discussion on the possibility of adding to the City ordinances statements
regarding violations of the gambling ordinances.
Leroux/Vierling moved to include this item under other business on the
agenda. Motion carried unanimously.
Wampach/Vierling moved to approve the minutes of August 26, 1986. Motion
carried with Cncl. Lebens abstaining.
Leroux/Vierling moved to approve the minutes of September 2 and September 9,
1986.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Leroux/Vierling moved to receive and place on file the letter from Mark A.
Kuechenmeister, resigning from the Downtown Committee. Motion carried
unanimously.
The City Administrator introduced Mr. Steve Stolen from Bellevue, Nebraska,
he is the new Zylstra-United Cable Manager.
The City Administrator reviewed the revised budget which reflects an estimate
of income and expenses for the first year of a Lodging Tax which would
finance construction and operation of a Visitor Center. Mr. Murray Williamson,
General Partner of the Shakopee Super 8 Motel wrote a letter to the City
Council stating his concern on being able to adjust his fees>to take into
account the imposition of a 3 percent tax.
Leroux/Wampach moved to direct the letter from Murray Williamson back to
Mr. Meers to meet with staff and discuss the trepidations of Mr. Williamson.
Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling moved to extend the approval of the final plat of GardenVilla
1st Addition 180 days or until March 19, 1987 and move its adoption.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Lebens/Leroux moved to reimburse Mr. Leo McGovern the amount of $300.00 for
damage to his house during blasting operations during the 1980 Holmes Street
Trunk Storm Sewer Project, because this predates the current claims policy.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried
City Council
September 16, 1986
Page -2-
Leroux/Vierling moved to declare 57 bicycles as abandoned property
to be sold at auction.
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried.
Leroux/Vierling moved that the Downtown parking plan dated September
16, 1986 , as submitted be approved and implemented as soon as possible.
(Doc. No. cc-124) .
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried.
Discussion ensued on Shakopee Community Access Corporation By-Laws
and public access policies . Cncl . Leroux said that he feels adver-
tising should not be allowed on Channel 3. Potential FCC conflicts
may arise from policy Number Ten, Alpha-Numeric Advertising, and approval
of the By-Laws should be held up until we get turther clarification
from the Cable Communications Advisory Commission.
Leroux/Vierling moved to send the Shakopee Public Access Policies and
the Community Access Corporation By-Laws to Cable Communications
Advisory Commission. Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling moved to approve Change Order No. 2 for the 1986-1
Holmes Street Lateral Storm Sewer Project with an amendment extending
the completion date to October 1, 1986 . Motion carried with Cncl .
Lebens opposed.
Leroux/Vierling moved to approve the payment of $500.00 to the initial
operating fund of the Shakopee Water Management Organization, such
payment to be funded by the Storm Sewer Fund.
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried.
Leroux/Vierling moved to approve the payment of $200.00 to the initial
operating fund of the Sand Creek Water Management Organization, such
payment to be funded by the Storm Sewer Fund.
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried.
Ken Ashfeld said that the bids for prefabricated rubber crossing material
to be installed by Chicago Northwestern Railroad (CNR) on crossings
from Spencer Street to Atwood Street have been received and prices are
favorable. The CNR has not yet committed themselves to the completion
of the work so awardal of the contract will be delayed until such
commitment is received.
Discussion ensued on MNDOTs response to various proposals submitted to them
last spring on Trunk Highway 169/101 Interim Intersection Improvements .
It was suggested to prohibit westbound 101 to southbound Holmes
Street turning movements from 6 :00 a.m. to 8: 00 a.m. and 3 :00 p.m. to
6 :00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Further discussion ensued on dis-
allowing left turns all the time to enable traffic to move faster
and smoother.
Wampach/Vierling moved to direct staff to draft a resolution requsting
Mn/DOT to prohibit westbound T.H. 101 to southbound Holmes Street turning
movements from 6 :00 a.m. to 8 :00 a.m. and 3 :00 p.m. to 6 :00 p.m. ,
Monday through Friday.
City Council S'
September 16, 1986
Page -3-
Leroux/Vierling moved to amend the main motion to read prohibit west-
bound T.H. 101 to southbound Holmes Street turning movements at all
times . Motion carried with Cncl . Wampach opposed.
Motion carried unanimously on amended main motion.
Leroux/Wampach moved to table the request to Mn/DOT to install the
necessary directional signage and pavement striping to facilitate
a double left turn from southbound TH to eastbound TH 101 , and
also the request to prohibit parking from 50 feet along the
south side of TH 101 east -of Holmes Street. Motion carried
unanimously.
Lebens/Vierling moved to direct staff to install a stop sign as Berg
Drive intersects with Hauer Trail . Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Leroux moved to direct staff to prohibit parking on Hauer
Trail on the south side from Park Ridge Drive to Jasper Road. Motion
carried unanimously.
Wampach/Vierling moved to direct staff to install an advisory curve
sign on Hauer Trail. Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling moved to direct the appropriate City Officials to draft
a letter to Thomas J. Lannon, Deputy Auditor Scott County, indicating
that the Cicy of Shakopee is interested in acquiring the tax forfeited
parcel of Norton Drive located in Deerview Acres (outlot "A") .
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried.
Dave Mac Gillivary of Springstead Inc. addressed the council asking for
consideration of a resolution providing for the sale of a $480,000
general obligation improvement refunding bonds . Discussion ensued
on refunding the 1981A Improvement Bond Issue.
Leroux/Wampach offered Resolution No. 2620, A Resolution Providing
for the Sale of $480,000 General Obligation Improvements Refunding
Bonds , Series 1986A, and moved its adoption (per exhibit C, page 2 of 3
of their recommendation dated September 12, 1986. ) Motion carried.
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None
p Vierling/Leroux moved to approve the bills in the amount of $702,720.44.
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried.
Gary Laurent said that the Downtown committe has been obtaining sig-
natures from property owners for the proposed downtown streetscape
prject. This allows for a feasibility study to be done. Mr. Laurent
explained that all the people who signed the petition do not understand
what will be proposed but that they are interested in learning what
will be proposed. He explained that there are some misconception' s
about the downtown paying for the bridge and that some property owners
would like to see efforts made to improve the downtown. Apparently
the Downtown Committe needs to have more small informational meetings
to inform the public. He submitted the petition signed by property
owners to the Council .
City Council
September 16, 1986
Page -4-
Butch Noterman, one of the property owners stated that his concern
is that he will be responsible for the assessments and he questioned
the fact that this petition is for a feasibility study only. He
stated that there will be some people who will be requesting that
their name$=_be removed from this petition. The City Administrator
said that the legal process is that first you order the feasibility
report and then hold a public hearing on the assessments .
Mr. Perry stated that if people had been advised of the cost up front,
they would not have signed the petition.
Cal Brown stated that the petition was presented as requesting study
only, he didn' t know he 'd have an assessment of $8 ,000.00.
Gene Pearson Florists , stated that he was not informed about the cost
to his property. He believes the concept is good and something should
be done but maybe the City could look into putting this project on
a general levy basis if it improves the whole town.
Discussion continued on financing alternatives, assessing, ad valorem,
and Tax Increment Financing from the racetrack and K-Mart T. I .F districts.
Leroux/Vierling moved to approve Resolution #2610, declaring adequacy
of petition and ordering preparation of report on the Downtown Street-
scape Improvement Project, with the addition of a 3rd paragraph for
the Finance Department to research alternative methods of financing
for preparation of a feasibility report, and moved its adoption.
Leroux/Wampach moved to table the resolution. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Leroux moved to accept the petition as presented to the Council
at this time, and declare its adequacy. Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux asked if anyone from the audience who signed the petition would
like to retract his -name at this time. There were none.
Leroux/Wampach moved to remove Resolution #2610 from the table. Motion
carried unanimously.
Upon question of the Chair, "Shall Resolution No. 26105 now pass?"
Roll Call : Ayes : Cncl . Leroux, Wampach, Vierling and Mayor Reinke
Noes : Cncl . Lebens
Motion carried.
Leroux/Wampach moved for a 10 minute recess at 9 :57 P.M. Motion carried
unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling moved to reconvene at 10: 12 P.M. Motion carried un-
animously.
Vierling/Leroux moved to direct appropriate City officials to contact
Waste Management giving them permission to contact property owners
in the Montecito Heights area and adjacent Eagle Creek Boulevard area
to place them under the City' s refuse contract, and to follow-up in 6
months with those not using the City contact to see if they would then
be willing to change. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council
September 16 , 1986
Page -5-
The City Engineer reviewed the 4th Avenue Streetscape report. He
said that the imformation in this report will also be reviewed during
the public hearing on September 23 , 1986.
Wampach/Vierling moved to accept the feasibility report on the
Fourth Avenue Streetscape from Holmes to Scott. Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux Vierling offered Resolution No. 2617 , A Resclutior, of Appreciation
to lion McNeil and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2622 , A Resolution Declaring
a Vacancy on the 8hakcpee City Council , and moved its adoption.
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried.
Leroux/Vierling offered Resoluticn No. 2618, a Resolution apportioning
assessment among new parcels created as a result of the subdivision
of Land Parcel No. 27-909011-0, and moved its adoption.
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried.
Leroux/Virling offered Resolution No. 2619, a Resolution apportioning
assessment among new parcels created as a result of the subdivision of
Land Parcel No. 27-114-004-0, and moved its adoption.
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried.
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2616 , A Resolution Designating
Commissioner and Alternate Commissioner to the Shakopee Basin Water-
shed and moved its adaption.
. Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried.
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2614, A Resolution amending
Resolution: No. 2457 adopting the 1986 Budget, and moved its adoption.
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous . Noes : None Motion carried.
Discussion continued on the possible violations of the city code re-
lating to gambling.
Leroux/Lebens moved to refer this matter back to staff for researching
amending the city code to provide the revocation-,°-suspension and/or
non-renewal of liquor licenses in the City of Shakopee upon the
conviction of a violation of the charitable gambling laws . Motion
carried unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling moved to direct staff to include Scott County ' s assess-
ment for the 1986-3 Fourth Avenue Reconstruction Project in their
County aid to the project, amounting to $219,964.14.
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried.
Wampach !Lebens moved to authorize the appropriate City Officials to
enter into Agreement No. 8605 between Scott County and the City of
Shakopee for the County State-Aid Cost sharing of the 1986-3 Fourth
Avenue Reconstruction Project.
Doll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried.
City Council
September 16, 1986
Page -6-
The Finance Director reviewed the budget information regarding
ways to use the tax increment monies to reduce the tax burden
on the General Fund for 1987 .
The City Administrator said that the Hardrive Case is coming
to Court on October 2 . Discussion ensued on the possibility
of having engineers testify as expert witnesses .
Leroux/Vierling moved to authorize up to $100 per hour with a four
hour minimum for courtroom testimony and an $85 dollar per hour
preparation time for use of engineers as expert witnesses .
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried.
Lebens/Leroux moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 11 :07 p.m.
Judith S. Cox
City Clerk
Carol Schultz
Recording Secretary
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ADJ. REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA SEPTEMEER 23 , 1986
Mayor Reinke called the meeting to order at 7 : 00 p .m. with Cncl .
Lebens , Vierling , Wampach and Leroux: present . Also present were
Judith S . Cox , City Clerk; John K . Anderson , City Administrator ;
Ken Ashfeld , City Engineer ; and Julius A. Coller , City Attorney .
Mayor Reinke asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to
speak on anything not on the agenda.
Glen Steir , 15736 Red Brickyard Rd , Shakopee , said he was going to
buy a home on the corner of 10th and VanBuren and would like to build
a garage on the lot . Ile asked for permission to have a curb cut off
10th Avenue for his driveway . Cncl . Leroux stated that in the past
requests for curb cuts off of 10th Avenue have been denied because
the City is trying to cut down the number of entrances unto 10th
Avenue .
E Leroux/Lebens moved to deny the request of Mr . Steir to have a curb
cut off of 10th Avenue . Motion carried unanimously.
Lebens /Vierling moved to receive and file the Action Alert Memo from
Ann Higgins , League of Minnesota Cities re : Support for compromise
amendments on stormwater discharge permits in conference committee
ori reauthorization of federal clean water act .
Roll ' Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried .
Leroux/Lebens moved to open the public hearing on proposed assessment
for the Timber Trails Street Rehabilitation 86-5 , Resolution No . 2628 .
Motion carried unanimously .
The City Engineer stated that there are 44 benefitted lots in the pro-
ject and the assessed cost per lot is $649 . 66 per lot .
Mr . Elmer Marschall , owner of Parcel No . 27-919-014-0 asked how the
City Engineer derived 6 lots on that parcel and thought it was high .
The City Engineer replied that they estimated , using the subdivision
laws , that six lots to be 2Z acres in size could be created abutting
Lakeview Drive .
Leroux/Vierling moved to close the public hearing . Motion carried
unanimously .
i
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No . 2628 , A Resolution Adopting
Assessments Project No . 1986-5 , Timber Trails Street Rehabilitation
and moved its adoption .
Mr . Elmer Marschall asked if there was a possibility to have the assess-
ment deferred until such time as the parcel is platted into the 6 lots .
Discussion ensued on when the assessments become payable , the City
Administrator reviewed the payment policy stating that if the assess-
ment is paid within 30 days from adoption of this resolution there
will be no interest charged .
City Council
September 23 , 1986
Page -2-
Leroux/Vierling moved to amend Resolution 42628 to defer the assess-
ment on parcel 27-919014-0 registered to Daniel J . O ' Connor of Prior
Lake in the amount of $3 , 897 . 98 for a period of 5 years or until such
time as it is platted whichever comes first , with interest accruing
during this period . Motion carried unanimously .
Lebens/Vierling moved to amend Section 2 of the Resolution to read
December 31 , 1987 instead of 1986 . Motion carried unanimously .
Roll Call on Resolution No . 2628 as amended : Ayes : Unanimous
Noes : None
Motion carried .
Lebens/Vierling moved to open the public hearing on proposed assess-
ment for 4th Avenue Reconstruction from fillmore Street to Scott
Street , 8603 , Resolution No . 2627 . Motion carried unanimously .
The City Engineer said that the proposed assessment costs are $98 , 033 . 13 .
The assessments are for all front footage from Fillmore Street to
Scott Street , which derives a cost of $24 . 25 per front foot cost .
The sanitary sewer service rehabilitation cost is $733 . 60 per lot . He
stated that a letter was received from Arlene and Stanley Stejskal
regarding their property at 326 Fillmore , in referring to this lot
there is a question as to whether or not the vacated railroad property
abutting 4th Avenue belongs to the Stejskals or the railroad . Cncl .
Leroux asked about the discrepancy of the assessments for St . Marks.
Church and St . Francis Hospital . The City Engineer stated that the
St . Francis Hospital received a credit of $ 1 , 148 . 40 for the sidewalk
that will be left in place .
Rodney D . Clemens , 402 E . 4th Avenue , asked if the sidewalk would be
attached to the road or if it will be left where it was . The City
Engineer stated that it will be left where it was and the entire
boulevard will be regraded to accomodate the grade changes . He stated
there is only one retaining wall proposed to go in and that is on the
s o u t h s i d e o f Fourth Avenue between' Lewis and Sommerville.
Audrey Monnens , 338 E . 4th Avenue , stated she has a problem with the
9 inch slope on her lawn . The City Engineer said there is no retaining
wall proposed for that area but that the Inspectors and Engineer will
take a look at the property .
Ray Siebenaler , 119 W. 4th Avenue stated that he was told he was only
being assessed for the new sewer to his home and the project would
not cost anything. The City Engineer said that there must have been
a misunderstanding and that the original project hearing that was
held last spring did not portray that statement . Mr . Siebenaler
asked why the assessments are not being deferred for this project .
The City Engineer said that the project is being assessed in con-
formance with the City ' s overall rehabilitation policy stating that
25% of the project cost will be assessed to the abutting benefitted
properties .
City Council
U
September 23 , 1986
Page -3-
Mrs . Nagel , 137 W. 4th asked why they are being assessed now when the
project is not completed . The Mayor answered that if it is not assessed
now and certified with the County by October 10 , 1986 there would be
another year of interest added on .
Laura Lebens , 211 W. 4th Avenue , asked how many bids besides Hentges
were taken for the project , and why was Hentges chosen . The Mayor
replied that by State law the City is required to take the lowest
bidder . The City Engineer said that there were four bidders , and that
the west side should be completed by the middle of October . Discussion
ensued on the traffic along 4th Avenue .
Ethel Hirscher , 329 E . 4th Avenue asked if all the sidewalks were
going to be replaced . The City Engineer replied that all of the side-
walks will be replaced .
Frank F . Schneider , 127 W. 4th Avenue expressed concern over the re-
placement of the sanitary sewer tiles and the techniques used to
evaluate their condition . The City Engineer said that the best way
is to use the lamping method using a mirror and a light .
Richard Nead , 303 E . 4th Avenue asked if he would be charged again for
the streetscape on sommerville curbing . The City Engineer replied
that he would not be charged again.
It was asked if there was a chance that the sanitary sewer in a
manhole for the storm sewer might freeze and break. The City Engineer
replied that there is no chance of it breaking , there is actually
heat inside the pipes . He also stated that the sanitary sewer was
temporary and could be removed with another project .
Frank Schneider , 127 W. 4th Avenue said there is no storm sewer on his
block . The City Engineer said there is only curb and getter , streets
and surfacing assessed on this project .
Tom Phillips , 969 Holmes , asked what will happen to his sidewalk and
will they move the pole in the middle of the sidewalk on 4th and Fuller .
The Mayor said that it was an agreement with the Shakopee Public Utilities .
The City Engineer said he will follow up with SPUC on the pole location
and whether or not it needs to be relocated .
Cncl . Leroux asked about the handicapped accessability - in the parking
lot and driveway between the courthouse and the hospital . The City
Engineer said that the driveway out of the parking lot will be re-
placed to taper off for handicapped accessibility .
Thomas Phillips asked about the liability and where it falls if some-
one were to slip on a ramp .
Dean Walden , corner of 3rd and Fuller asked when his corner will be
repaired because it is torn up right now. The Mayor replied that they
just started doing some asphalt work in that particular area, the rain
has delayed the project . Cncl . Lebens said that Mr . Walden would be
getting the new curb that will be put in the downtown area, He will
get a temporary tarvia curb right now.
i
City Council
September 23 , 1986
Page -4-
The question was raised as to what the utility bill is for that comes
every 3 months . The City Engineer said that it is a method that the
city adopted to finance storm sewer projects . The storm sewer that
is going in now is not being assessed to the homeowners but is in the
form of a utility bill to all the people who benefit from this new
storm sewer .
Mayor Reinke asked if there was anyone else from the audience who
wished to address this issue . There was no response .
Wampach/Vierling moved to close the public hearing . Motion carried
unanimously .
Leroux/Vierling moved that when Resolution No . 2627 is offered that
the Stejskal parcel Number 27001379-0 be removed from the assessment
roll-. . Motion carried unanimously .
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution 42627 , a Resolution Adopting Assess-
ments for Project 1986-3 , Fourth Avenue Reconstruction from Fillmore
Street to Scott Street , and moved its adoption with the date change
in Section 2 amended to read December 31 , 1987 .
Roll Call : Ayes : Cncl . Leroux, Vierling , Wampach and Mayor Reinke
Noes : Cncl . Lebens
Motion carried .
The City Administrator explained the payment policies and that the
assessments can be paid by two alternatives . The first is that the
total assessment can be paid within 30 days from tonight without
any interest being charged , the second alternative is to pay it over
a 10 year period with two payments each year along with property taxes .
Leroux/Wampach moved for a 10 minute recess at 9 : 12 P .M. Motion
carried unanimously.
Vierling/Wampach moved to reconvene at 9 : 27 P .M. Motion carried un-
animously .
Wampach/Leroux moved to open public hearing on proposed improvements
to 13th Avenue from CR 89 to the East corporate limits 86-9 , Res . No .
2625 . Motion carried unanimously .
The City Engineer stated that the proposed improvements are to grade
that particular roadway and to install a normal urban curb and gutter
street with bituminous paving . The estimated cost of the project is
$246 , 147 . 00 . 82% of the project cost will be assessed to the abutting
property owners , the other 18% will be picked up by city funds and
state aid because it is 8 ' wider than a normal 36 ' wide street . This
public hearing will be continued to October 7 , 1986 , in order to
give proper notice to the owner of Tract Q .
Mayor Reinke asked if there was anyone from the audience who wished
to address this issue .
City Council
September 23 , 1986
Page -5-
Robert Stewart , owner of lots 22 , 24-27 said that it was his impres-
sion that the lots were zoned light industrial . He asked why 13th
Avenue needs to be upgraded . The City Administrator said that the
City maintenance department has had complaints on the dust level .
There is more traffic in that area and it has been moving forward on
the 5 year plan . Discussion ensued on the traffic and the speeds on
13th Avenue .
Jack VanRemortal , said that over the past few years the Chicago-North-
west switch area has gotten busy and almost unbearable for any
business
sines
this
of tracks to get to 101 and they will be supporting project .
The City Engineer stated that lots 24-27 will be receiving .a frontagll
improvement just as the lots that are abutting the prof Y
wi
be paying to have it brought from a residential street to an industrial
street .
Wayne Lundgren said that he has 60 feet abutting Maras Street .
Dan Cheeever , 9040 13th Avenue, Lot 20 , asked what his cost was going
to be . The City E.-gineer explained the alternative that has been
discussed the most being $2 , 854 . 00 , which also includes storm sewer .
Terry Rice raised a concern over the speed limit on that road , and
the possi-ble need for some speed enforcement .
Discussion ensued on the possibility of leaving the street as it is
now ' and just upgrading it .
Lebens/Vierling moved to continue the public hearing to October 7, 1986,
at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Wampach/Vierling moved
the
public
Streethearing
Scotproposed
st86e3scape
improvements to 4th Avenue from Holmes
Resolution No. 2626. Motion Carried unanimously.
The City Engineer reviewed the proposed streetscape improvements to
n bth sides of the
4th Avenue from Holmes
imrovementstwillScott
consistStreet
o
of adding brick p
street . , Proposed p accentuation
" to the sidewalk and benches along the sidewalk area and constructing
a high and low level lighting system. The cost ranges from $132 , 000 -
$233 , 400 . Mayor Reinke said that since this was initiated by the City
this project will take 5 /6 of this council to do this public improve-
ment project . Cncl . Lebens and Wampach spoke against the project .
The City Administrator said that he received a letter today from the
County on this project indicating that they prefer the project not
go forward until after the downtown project has been finalized .
Father Hazel , St Mark ' s , said he had a letter to read into the record
but saw no need to do so now.
Wampach/Leroux moved to close the public hearing . Motion carried un-
animously .
City Council
September 23, 1986
Page -6-
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No . 2626 , A Resolution Ordering an
Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for 4th Avenue
Streetscape , Project No . 1986-3 . Motion failed with all opposed .
Leroux/Vierling moved to open public hearing on proposed improvements
to Valley Park Drive from T.H. 101 north approximately 350 feet and
improvements to the frontage road north of Hwy 101 from Valley Park
Drive west to the Peavey Road 86-11 , Resolution No . 2629 . Motion
carried unanimously.
The City Administrator said that the key reason this is being considered
is for the Prairie House Addition development . The terms of what
the final cost will be for the right-of-way are yet to be determined .
The City Engineer said he talked with Chuck Weichselbaum, District
State Aid Engineer about the possibility of a cost sharing agreement
with Mn/DOT and he indicated that it could possibly be a candidate
project and he plans to submit it as a project in May 1987 .
Tom Lyons , Prairie House , stated that they petitioned to have the inter-
section regraded and their service road attached to the intersection.
They should have all the documents , performance bond , maintenance bond
to the City by Monday and hope to be under construction by October 1 ,
1986 .
Larry Griffith, spoke on behalf of Valley Fair , stating that the least
objectionable alternative in the feasibility report is alternative
number 1 , Valley Park Drive North 350 ' ; however they like the developed
area as it is . he explained that the damages maybe more than estimated
so far .
Kurt Carlson , Peavey , said that this proposal does not affect their
property very much and they have no objections .
Tom Lyons asked that the condemmation settlement between the City and
Valley Fair be as reasonable as possible because it will be assessed
over a number of years .
Discussion ensued on the different alternatives that may become avail-
able in the future in regards to extending the service road .
The City Administrator explained that if a service road were constructed
and connected to Valley Park Drive North in the future a system
benefit assessment for this intersection could be assessed to Valley
Fair and others , and a reassessment reimbursement could be given to
Prairie House .
Lebens/Vierling moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried
unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No . 2629, A Resolution Ordering an
Improvement and Preparation of Plans and specifications for Valley
Park Drive from T .H. 101 to the North Approximately 350 feet , project
1986-11 , and moved its adoption.
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried .
City Council
S _ptember 23 , 1986
Page -7-
Lebens /Vierling moved to authorize release of the developer ' s agreement
for Hauer ' s 3rd Addition conditioned upon execution and recording of
a petition and waiver of assessments for 13th Avenue sidewalk and street
construction along the North side of 13th. Avenue` and a park- dedication agreement. . _.
Rall Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried .
Leroux/Vierling moved to approve the commission of Westwood Planning
and Engineering to complete the feasibility study and report for the
Downtown Streetscape Improvement Project at a cost not to exceed
$5 , 000 . 00 .
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried
Lebens/Vierling offered Resolution No . 2623 , A Resolution Amending
Resolution 2623 Adopting the 1986 Pay Schedule and moved its adoption .
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried .
Lebens/Vierling offered Resolution No . 2624 , A Resolution Authorizing
the Disposal of Unclaimed property, and moved its adoption .
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried .
Discussion on the 1987 budget will be held on September 30 , 1986 , at
7 : 00 p .m.
Leroux/Lebens moved to draft a check for $2 , 000 . 00 to Wangerin Inc .
a n d Robert Roos f o r settlement i n the. Wangerin lawsuit.
Roll Call : Ayes : Unanimous Noes : None Motion carried .
Vierling/Leroux moved to adjourn to September 30 , 1986 , at 7 : 00 p .m.
Motion carried unanimously . Meeting adjourned at 11 : 45 p .m.
Judith S . Cox
City Clerk
Carol Schultz
Recording Secretary
September 16, 1986 1 i Z9g6
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ray Siebenaler
RE: City Council Vacancy
1 am submitting my name to fill the vacancy on the
City Council.
The following is a resume' of the various positions I
have been active in over a period of years:
1. Eight years as Mayor of Shakopee
' 2. Ten Years on the City Council of Shakopee
3. Chairman of the Holmes Street Ad-Hoc Committee
4. Two years as a member of the Metro Waste Commission
5. Appointed a Commissioner on condemnation for Scott
County
6. Member of the Scott County Human Services Board
I would very much appreciate your support.
Sincerely,
Ray Siebenaler
119 West Fourth Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Sept. 12 , 1986
Honorable Eldon Reinke � �,
Mayor of City of Shakopee
129 lst Ave . E. EP 1 5196
Shakopee , Minnesota 55379 S
Dear Mayor Reinke , C`;Y OF
Please accept this letter introduction as my applica-
tion to fill the vacancy of City Council Member. Dean Colligan.
My husband, Gary, and I have lived in the city of Shako-
pee for 10 years . We have three children, Bob 16 , Christopher
10, and Amanda 6 .
The following is a list of civic and fraternal organiza-
tions I have worked with, which have given me experience in
working with the citizens of Shakopee:
Mobile Meals : 1986-87 Vice President, 1984-86 President ,
1982-84 Secretary, Delivery 1978-Present.
Cub Scouts : 1978-86 - held positions of leader , Secretary,
Assistant Cub Master , Committee Chairman,
and Treasurer.
Member of League of Women Voters : 1984
School Board Candidate: 1984
Advisory Committee for School District: 1984
Election Judge: 1982-Present
Bucket Brigade : 1978-79
Fraternal Order of Eagles : Auxiliary Secretary (Business
Manager)
I feel that I would be an asset to the City of Shakopee,
and I am looking forward to working with you.
Respectfully submitted,
Delores Morke
1042 Merrifield St.
Shakopee , Minnesota 55379
(phone-445-7642)
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
POLICY
ADOPTION
MEETING
0
bo
0
We're making a change . . .
WHAT The League will adopt legislative policies in November this year, instead of at
the beginning of the legislative session.
WHY Adopting policies earlier will give League members and lobbyists an opportunity
to contact legislators and draft legislation concerning city policies before the
legislative session begins. Please note that the League will continue to hold the
Legislative Conference as before with in-depth workshops on legislative issues,
comments from legislators, and a reception for legislators and city officials.
That conference will be on March 10, 1987.
WHERE The policy adoption meeting will be at the Sheraton Midway-St. Paul off of
Hwy. 94 (400 N. Hamline Ave.)
WHEN Thursday, November 20, 1986 at 9 a.m.
WHO All member cities should try to attend. Each city has a vote.
COST i ieiC IS 'IAV FEE
LiUi tills
ii'ie0ti1l9, ilvvJcVci, advance registrations Vvill
u c14�L.
us to plan for the appropriate number of participants.
AGENDA 9:00 - 10: 00 a.m. Registration (coffee & rolls)
9:15 - 9:45 a.m. Pre-conference policy briefing
10:00 a.m. . . . Policy adoption
Lunch is on your own.
So, mark your calendars . . .
IIID,
Nov. 20 Policy adoption meeting ,,,,1111 al MIT I
March 10 Legislative conference
U
9�
October 2, 1986 OCI'3
1986
To the Shakopee City Council :
I am writing to you because of my interest in the vacant city
council seat.
I am a native of Shakopee and have lived here for 28 years and
feel a great responsibility and concern for the future of our
city. I have also been a homeowner for the past four years and
know the concerns residents have about taxes and the development
of Shakopee.
My wife and I have one child and are expecting another child in
early 1987. We want to raise our children in a community that offers
an atmosphere for positive growth.
My past association with the local newspaper for five years as an
advertising representative has given me a good understanding of
the concerns of the merchants in Shakopee.
I also feel I would bring a fresh viewpoint and perspective to the
issues concerning the city of Shakopee because I have contact with
many of the younger residents and homeowners in the area.
I realize and understand the commitment required of a member of the
Shakopee City Council . I am willing to make that commitment because
I believe in this city and the people who live here.
Alan E, Breuer
620 East 8th
Shakopee MN 55379
445-1908
3
ALAN E. BREUER Date of Birth - June 24, 1958
620 East 8th Avenue Height - 6'1 , Weight - 200 lbs .
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Health - Excellent
612/445-1908 Marital Status - Married , 1 Child
WORK EXPERIENCE
Southwest Suburban Publishing Co. , Shakopee, Minnesota- January 1980-present
Publisher's of 5 Southwest Mctro area newspapers in Shakopee, Eden Prairie,
Chaska , Prior Lake and Jordan. Advertising Sales Consultant, responsible
for maintaining/servicing establisi1ed accounts, selling to new accounts,
responsibilities include ad sale, layout, design, assisting businesses in
promotional ideas and campaigns, collection on delinquent accounts . Assisted
in overall newspaper layout and in-house promotional campaigns.
Super America Store, Shakopee, Minnesota- January 1977-January 1980
Plight Shift Supervisor, responsible for cash reports, displaying mer-
chandise, store operations .
Crown Auto Store, Shakopee, Minnesota- August 1975-January 1977
Salesperson, responsible for customerassistance, merchandising display,
cashiering, inventory.
EDUCATION
Hennepin Technical Center, South Campus, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
July 1978-December 1979.
Marketing and Merchandising Program, Professional Sales, Retail
Merchandising and Management Course.
Human Relations Supervision
Marketing Buying and Pricing
Fundamentals of Business Promotion
Economics Accounting
Basic Sales Advanced Sales (500 hours)
Business Math Credit
Oral and Written Communications Time and Territory Management
(Toastmasters) Sales Management
Sales Promotion
ACHIEVEMENTS
Participant 1979 Distributive Education Clubs of America
Career Development Conference
Speech Competition - First Place
PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION ACTIVITIES
Member of Toastmasters International
Best Speaker Awards - (3) H.T.C. Chapter
Best Evaluator Award - (2) H.T.C. Chapter
1 Best Impromptu Award - (1 ) H.T.C. Chaper
PROGRAM AWARDS AND ACTI`dITIES
Speaker of the Year Award - 1978-1979 - H.T.C. Chaper
Student of the Quarter for Business Occupations - 1978-1979
Speech Workshop Presenter - State - D.E.C.A. officer training conference
REFERENCES SUBMITTED UPON REQUEST
U
i
October 4, 1986
Honorable Council Person of the City of Shakopee:
l would like w apply for the position open on the Shakopee City Council
due to the resignation of Mr, Dean Golligan.
Since moving to the City of Shakopee in 1977, 1 have become increasingly
interested in how and what the city is doing for its citizens to make irks
a desirable place to live and in marry cases, work. I have taken an active
role when possible and have also been on the Cable Access Committee for the
pa--t two years. I have taken an interest in various issues concr-ning zoning
regulations and the addition of Canterbury Downs to our community. I have
attended city council meetin-s periodically and voiced not my opinions
concerning various matters; but also have spoken on behalf of my neighbors
and acquaintances.
In 1983, I campaigned and ranfor a position on the City Council of Shakopee.
During that time I met many new people in the area. Although I was not
elected., T did receive a fair amount of support from the voting public.
I feel I would he an asset to the community since I do have the ability
to look at issues with an, open and unbiased outlook. I am fairly well known
and respected due to my positon as a depity with Che Scott County Sheriff"**
Departmentand do come into contact drily with citizens of Shakopee.:
I would appreciate your consideration of my request to become a member of
the city council. I feel I am a truly concerned and knowledgeable me<<<ber
of the community who would like to help Shakopee not only make the quality
of life better for its present citizens, but also attract more people arid
businesses to our fine city.
Sincerely,
r
Clifford D.. Stafford
2328 Eagle Creek Blvd.
Shakopee, Mn. 55379
`OT V
V 1J�
r4 SH A KODEi
RESOLUTION NO. 2625
A Resolution Ordering An Improvement And
The Preparation of Plans And Specifications For
13th Avenue from County Road 89
to the East Corporate Limits
Project No. 1986-9
WHEREAS, Resolution No . 2597 , adopted on August 5 , 1986 ,
fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed street
improvements of 13th Avenue from County Road 89 to the East
Corporate Limits ; and
WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the hearing through
two weekly publications of the required notice was given and the
hearing was held on the 23rd day of September 1986 , at which time
all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be
heard thereon.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1 . That the improvement is ordered as hereinafter
described:
Street Improvements to 13th Avenue from County Road 89 to
the East Corporate Limits
2. Ken Ashfeld, is hereby designated as the engineer for
this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for
the making of such improvement.
Adopted in session of the City Council of
the City of Shakopee , Minnesota, held this day of
19
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Apprgy,e
.4 as to form this 7_ day of
19 A6
City Att ne
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Enginee5,W--
SUBJECT: 13th Avenue ; County Road 89 to East City Limits
DATE: October 2 , 1986
INTRODUCTION:
On September 23 , 1986 , Council opened a public hearing for
proposed roadway improvements to 13th Avenue from County Road 89
to the east corporate limits . Based on a right-of-way
acquisition issue and a notice of hearing issue, that public
hearing was adjourned until October 7 , 1986 . This will serve as
a status update since the September 23 , 1986 hearing.
BACKGROUND:
Attached is Figure 1 indicating the study area and also a copy of
a registered land survey which makes up a portion of the study
area . Also attached is a zoning map which delineates those
properties which are zoned residential and those that are
industrial. The owner of tract A and tract Q have been notified
of the hearing proceedings. The two tracts have common ownership
by Mr . and Mrs. Perry Cheever.
The Cheevers have notified other property owners adjacent to
tracts A and Q that they are using these properties without
easement rights. It is my understanding that a few lots do have
easement rights but the remaining ones for all practical purposes
are land locked.
In meeting with the representatives for the Cheevers, it was
indicated to me that the owners wish to dispose of tracts A and Q
for various reasons including liability. They feel there is
certain value to land but propose that if the City was to
purchase tract A, they would deed to the City, tract Q for no
further consideration. At this point , no value has been
determined for tract A.
If Council elects to proceed with improvements to 13th Avenue,
the City only has an interest in tract A. Accepting ownership of
tract Q for the purposes of a public roadway puts the City in the
Position of accepting a roadway that is far from an acceptable
condition.
13th Avenue
October 2, 1986
Paae 2
Alternatives:
If Council elects to proceed with the proposed project, the
following alternatives are available for the acquisition of
right-of-way for 13th Avenue :
1 . Acquire tract A only.
2 . Acquire tract A and Q with no further improvements to
Q.
3 . Acquire tract A and accept tract Q only upon receiving
a petition from abutting property owners to improve Q.
4. Acquire tract A and accept tract Q only upon receiving
a petition and waiver of assessment appeal from
abutting property owners to improve Q.
5 . Acquire tract A and tract Q and Council initiate an
improvement to Q.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Alternative 2 would set an undesirable precedent and shift
liability from the current owner to the City. There may be some
difficulty in proving benefit for alternatives 3 and 5. Since
the proposed project involves 13th Avenue only, I recommend
alternative 1 , either by negotiation or condemnation. If access
rights become a problem for property owners adjacent to tract Q,
alternative 4 will become easier to achieve . Also , by
alternative 1 , tract Q becomes benefitted by the proposed
improvements to 13th Avenue and may be assessed.
The feasibility report presented an alternative assessment method
of 60% assessed cost spread over the front footage and 40%
assessed cost over the benefitted area. Attachedare
are two comparisonre
of
assessment runs of 65%/35% and 70%/30% splits.
the various assessment runs provides some insight as to how
individual assessments vary by changing the split.
REQUESTED ACTION:
If Council wishes to proceed with the 13th Avenue project:
1. Offer Resolution No. 2625 , A Resolution Ordering an
Improvement and the Preparation of Plans and
Specifications for 13th Avenue from County Road 89 to
the East Corporate Limits, Project No. 1986-9 and move
its adoption.
2. Move to direct staff to commence the necessary actions
to acquire Tract A of Registered Land Survey No. 24 by
negotiation or condemnation.
STUDY AREA
BOUNDARY
Aw__ STORM I
SEWER -1
2
FRONT FOOTAGE
1t "PROJECT AREA —•—�
4t1 1 ail 920 2 1 135
6 1 7 �/// 23 �3-4 k
1tt 3 4 5
v�� I33
/!//// 22 12a 132
16 2 CZ 131
( 2 130
8
t k�
is 28
NON-ABUTTING
BENEFITED AREA
!= 14 `!
10 13
11 `
29
12
c 10
C `
12
FIG . 1 `
S T UDY AREA
l
f
ED LAND
EGIS
U
sco l I C Ou N Im I
SCOL` l INCH = 200
L
t 26
V - 56747 - r 1/4 Cor. .SFC_ I Z
SL7.C7"
✓Do 50 �7
6 Q E
�7
NC
I00 /00' 2o.c7 T j ice o� 4
41)v
IN
_ - - 20.07•
- iso `
0
P /SD
Z/7 S6
507 0
rvf 57
O ...
`� ��•:
moi- :.:rir;: .
. ......................
. ...........
.......... ....
Pr
AVE•3+:�a...sert.�..�..+. t� ..... ..... t..... ter` 'w `r` �
! is � ■ � a� x
Cy
...".`w..+•-......a��w�.._...+......� �� � : jam..
y# •+•.s
y � r
u
C t
(p
PNW 0A
i
Assessable %i'3dunt' 3i 01,84 v.vi%
trr!nt tf�dt Cost, iv(0216.68
Jailor e rdd i. Ldsti
V.Vib51\%.
iuvf.h rf,elluc Special hoscslacrt_5 -----------------------------------
ront Foot Square Foot
-'1"-
h.-1,•lily
Cnua'c ssec,sms t F-sess�^Et i h=aE55ice:i:
nd.,
Par[el n Owner Luuc
w4
------------- f i, t i M17:: 9" .r i n ui, i i yD 7 i,J
if= - •;•-, f,nnn, i +IJ,l•r r.ci rc,Rv4.uv lb t.P`/ Sec Ii, Twsp 115 " V... 1C�i,U9.'•V
2i-r1i.v1�! 1 Northwest Asphalt �
i45i rR 89 'ring
Shakopee, MN 55 7i
L 1 ill pe[ 1 iw d 115 1:-7.92 u7i! if.Oe $4r,_.5 S4 -111.075.38 $5�,�2i.2i
2-1-912006-1 ;;drttiwest risp'rlait �,
1451 CR 19 Rng 2c
phakcpee, NN; 55379
n%ci ^^� R RRI P/C! Sec 12, Twsp 115 41,).00 25i�470,00 $1 ,67?..•J $4,135,29 $16,813.17
.i 1120;2'4 tag!_ Lr__k Lard Gd.
•�*1!t at. Paler Lit. Rllg LL
,ll, Paul, FIN 55102
2 $10,812.58 t7 ,-7, �t, x14 59 .2=
- t ! P/G pec 12, Twsp 115 750.00 '25690.00 +., !J.'. - ,
? a VLA Cdgae Gree.; Land Co.Lo,
72 St. Peter Sl, R n g 22
pt. Pail, ii ; SJiCi
_
27-9f1ry$022-1 $7,775.70 598.c
Eagle . L . JPtfiJ12Tws115 1cu
7172 St, Peter St. Rnd 22
_-,02
Ji. rad)., !`!f� JJi:'2
' IV:; =
La u1 rD : $j,R4ML
615
-$57$)01-0 Arden h Dale 6riepp ib4 V , l, i .i%
Rt 1, Box 1ti_17
Shakopee, Md 553'i9
2f-C157tiii712 BI Ma_'.a. Add�r $719,15 = !9.15
2-tCriepp BrvS, L .} i (tii { ; iC
. . Rd.
Rt 1, Box 1041
t. cc+��
Jr!akupee, MIN 5531`-
.« t.^. rli t gin)
( }} )� �„� ^ �' B ^�-� s '1=�`� (.00 102725.00 �^,i;;f f1,D,6. 11,696.':'.
7-3570V3 `f Arden _ Dale r'riepp L 1 1101 a_ AGlu f.
fit 1, Box 1007
Shakopee, NN :5379
-�
., in 037,63 $1',fl C•i.
c7-�f19vu! l%Zni giis Luella Olson 9 Li Bt L
6820 Vincent sive S. valley Rich ist
Ri[hfiell d, FIN 5-592=
t, T fi ill: $j,i'il.Y�
-914202 -0 Earl Zachariaspec 11, Iwsp 15 t',
27 raibi6
PJ Box 15 Rag --
Savage, MN 55378
c-10is ??
27-9;202. Glenn Zacharias
li PiloPu Sec 12, Twsp i15 0.00 1089C...0tfi
1.300 Horizon Cir. Rng 22
Burnsville, MIN 55337
17-912024'0 Ai ?'Gi'12rg Lalid Scc!pi ng 12 PIL! pC[ 12, Twsp iid
0.00 415958.00 $0.00 $6,868.01 $6,868.01
4309 N. 99th St. Rrig 22
254311
Bloomington, MNJ,J+J1
Assessable Amount: `01,640.00
^ -L a r a,
t+a:, , n. r ru:it ait Lu]t, ii`L+.?ciGhtl
r.^=
a.t±± ^seri iSY - .peil di fiiSGchwien t: f^
`quare root Lost: 0-016�U
Map
-�__-
Gw^^fill _ ., ;.^'^^: •' -, ro.:f tGti. qua:e reit
j 1
Parcel w i?nel vie ^_ , ,Cil un �^ : L - a i ._aa
11 on- Ft ouar_ t Assessment `irissessment.
4!—f1tV_4—i h[iY [. L{J t%Sir'ell 11y [.it r. SEE r L et 1:, _ lir s00
. n _�44i1,ijt Sv,.l; Ulu.'n7`( 4y '^, 8
ii vr, up LC111 Hrtc. �. Rng cc
rliiomington, 1111 t.7,777_
27-V701001-i, 7
[ v Roy E. t�ug5ireil i4 LI Yi 0.00 69vii.Ul137.48 3i,iJ`i.'Tt�
112(}1 L:pton A.v . 5. �'a1 «y 'r,ic n 1st
GlVi�lrgtlll, MIN JJ7'37
L^7_05tOn)=_rl .ni1llldH H. Cooke 15 L: BI {,rt( 1(42B:,Ot $01 $11$727i,/�
$1,721.72
5512 Thomas Ave. S. Maras Add'n
inneapoli , 111 55410
27-05700"0 Lundgren Properties. 16 16 B1 0.00 104285,00 $0,00 $1,721.76 $1,721.76
5609 35th Ave. S. Maras Add�n
�IrriedpulIS, MN 55417
27-057007-0 4iliial» H. Cooke 17 L7 B1 253.77) 104289.00 $8,773.4?}
5:512 i icds Ave. 5. liar as Add'n
Minneapolis, MIN 55410
.7-64711%31-0 Daniel Mahoney I6 L HP 10(.00 •v,_` 'i 'r• Y- ,r, i i7
2992 E. 13th Ave. RLS 424
Shakopee, MP 55379
27-5i1i}
}43 7 n E.'-0 john Miller 19 L "L" S x00.00 0,00 X3,092.17 }.i}0 3 x;2,17
9616 E. 13th Ave. RLS t24 '=
Shakopee, MN 5: 79
Ifanlci {,bee=er 2`[} L "i" 100.00 0.00 �3,t}95.57 .�1ry k3,f;9i,1!
9040 E. 1_th Ave. RI 7?
L.J `vc4
6±iakopee, MN 5779
v�-l% Raymund Moen 21 L `Ea i0O.;(
Y $0.00
„� .
,�j92.17
13th Ave. RLS #24
„ieanopee, iii 55379
27-:143019-0 Robert K. Stewart ^2, 'So : ---
�t L l,'.[}l% I�%m IG_.Ott} �l},1311 _S, ,t7
11305 River Hills I}r. RLS ¢24 -
Burnsville, Mt: 55337
-[}4301I6-0 RaL'n,CUG E. Muen �_ BOB i};}
9064 E. 13th Ave. R_S R24
Shakopee, i ' 55379
27-[143C}15-0 Ri7crL K'". Stewart 24 La, a ,
1}[ GJ
� 's�l,V iL4i,6_� '7$i47r
i�r•c River n^a
ver Hillis Dr. R
1,_y_%J ..=7
'{?
Bul 11S4a1le, 71itk.±11 .5q,7 7
1
Assessable amount: $2011840.00
r__t, ♦+n "
i i vitt F,:za t Clost, a3�1.?L1 eon
Square i 304 LOs;.: 0.1110510
47.1.12 Avenue - Special AssesEenLs
Map r_i,{i;7.`; {i^ Front Foo? a[ut. _ Foot 'Total
_ Lro £ Description
Front Ft Square F.t hS=FSsEet iissEssment !ss£ssient
Farce! 4 Owner
27-v4�4i4�Q
Robert K. Otewart ... U.+•4tr #«;.�- i•i7t
L S.
.65
117.05 River dills Dr. RI ,urLf
Burnsville, Mid 55337
c at tr l-n�..}`{7.Q v.010 4?.u5 $247.65
27-0124301 -0 Robert K. StEwar t 26 L t (1,Jt• lav i%
11305 River hills Dr. RLS 4214
Burnsville, Mid 55337
1 $2-7.eJC
27-4!43012-0 Robert K. Stewart 4i L °" 0.G0 1500 11,11{IQ,QQ � ?4i.65
11305 River Hills Dr. h;LS x24
Burnsville, MN 55737
!�
L 0.00 2J3J4!Y,,V{} $0.00 14.b 0.62 $4,660.52
27-043018-0i Robert K. Stewart 28 PDQ
11305 River Hills Dr. RLS 924
Burnsville, Mtn 55337
27-043019-0 a1 RobErg Landscaping '" 537 , FQ.'i!
430 W. 79th _t.
Bloomington, Mi 5053/9
27 K"-043011-0 Richard Kessler 30 L " 11,00 0.00SCJ,{J{J ;;7.,;211 ;,00
°097 E. 13th Ave. F:LS -24
Shakopee, Mid 55379
2't-1243010-{JteY"cn G. G°£ode 31 L 9LL� 21.!22• 0,41{! f',{'{1 ;•{!.'jl! y4J,{iQ
9095 E. 13th Ave. RLS #24
Shakopee, Mid 553-19
9 _s.-v•_it Xt i Krause z'2 1 ttiz .J,{7.Q {,.V11 •v{%.Q;I YIJ.Q{! {1.�}{!
27'0470(17 v Neil t.. Kr aus'c
01085 E. 13th Ave RLS n24
Shakop£z, MN =77,9
- - ,,iJJ
"08-0 Neil d. Krause t,3 L `H` :!.1.0 tt.-- fi{
$11,0{5 $0,1,11
27-043L%:,:
LS #214
94193 5 E. i?th Ave F.
Shakopee, MN 1177,m
-043007-C', Charles A. :'an Hale 34 L 51:: 0.00 (J,Q1 J V).00 $0.00
90011 E. 13th Ave. 1, !;t',
5053719
9
Shakopee, Mid .,.L�ti_7t Y
L �F° 217.47 {!.:!� $0.00 $'3,432.P
27-:!47.4!06-Q Terry L. Rice w .
91{10 E. 13th Ave, RLS r24
Shakopee, MN 55:79
ictal 42,9 .,95 4279932.00 ;151,1' 1.{7.11 7u,b44,0v $4101,840.00
---------------
---------------
kc-e5sat'le Firount; ¥'tif 041 0
ron. foot Cost: iv_.Jit rJlii
11:`611: HVeitue - ;~peCl dl ft55e5Rent5 �ouare toot Cos'-:
l%.1111411 IL
------------------------------------------------ ------------ -- --- ---------------
MaG Q L Front Foot Scuare-Font -----T
g t_el
Parcel # Owner _gnc ties_rjnHon e
� - _ -_ .._573{is.•slent G5_cc5�unt iScceGgr£r,t
.. r2iviv-iorthweSt RSphait i P% bci. lit I�iSp 11110 �ii�..- 167!E- ?a2,tJ1O,1J 4L,401t.22 il7Jci=,cJ
1111.4.`11 C u7 Fang 22
Shatgpee, MN
i...�i'cra11�ivn,v7E,_1 5537°
riVthi£St Asphalt
. 'irt5Fl 12, r 15p itaeJ 15211
,92 6
711
6:424.l! s-50 tG 0.13
1451 vtGr,�Crzv`,aiCu �uLt:i•,37rT..,Jat
CR 5? Rng 22
Shakopee, MF; 55375
r-,- a " t i a 'Co. z t t e l, ;G 5 C t,ijt) �5�1Ylii.Qf) Vii• .b �.il ',3Y4,5= 1i,1ii.64
�: 7aivii 4 Eagle CrEEr: Land .. PID Sec 1 IW_ 11 10 ' " !3 5'
312 St. Peter St. Rng 22
St. Paul, MIN 55102
2'-G12:)22-3
Eagle Creek Land Co. 4 FIC S c 12 =_n 115 35t).�s{; 22S6rv,C��) i ,lag
g 4 r $11,655 •?,2 4.31 X14,071.q�1
2 St. Peter St. Rng
St. Paul, MN 5510,2 Y
3vt.000 2260190.00 i !,_= tt%^
ci'7 i2i�22-1 icgi£ Lr££i; Land Co. 5 Y�iQ .EC 111, IWSo 115 t V x'12 i.,JJ. 7 �3,113112,,.}1 #a-r,u7i.4�•
32 St. Feier 5t. Rng 22
t. Paul, M;; 551-0:2
27-0570011-0 i rdEn & hale uriepp b Ll F1 Maras Add'n 7, 602,` r,+j $9,4 FO , r; c7G t;i L^
i�:1,/ 1111 ut•i,tt ZJ,i�� . )1,?�! `%tel avL
Rt i 11ff., Fg.", �MN 11!67 (5
JhakopeC, 5511191
0
57I002
-J Bros. Con-U. Co. i u i liar aAid n 0.00 4 355e.v�
. t ,-11
nt 1 tifn
i, BOX 10.57
Snh L+!;6ip__, 111.' ,115377
:Jrln.z Muen i Dale 11. pp w L3 Hl ]Maras 111%2 . )Ez(1.6( $11,403.711 a2,+
Ri 1, lion' 1067
Shakopee, M1111 55377
47-091,0021-0
{ l41yL t ± Luella L1
5of ' L1 Pi t.iQ 1in�'at1�.l{ �{.Jt ;i,iu. tit?41;,
t"O Vincent Ave S. 1 2, 11
4ic-Ia E� 2,1111 t1: 1St
1IrhlitiG, MN 5+4.3
4 7lili26 V, Tari Zacharias it% P1 Be[ 211 Iri_r iii 1.,:;0 Onn i%t) Vii,11)1111 1 ti $1,541.10
I!, ;� 1i1Sr:.. +41,1 f
pa egx 15 Rng 211
Savage, MN 55375
I
n_ - 5 n 0t• 0 $1 =41.10
1111-7 i2tjiti+i) Glenn ZdCiiar2d5 li irr mei 12, iSp 11u v.U: 1e7tE),Ij�t ;... yl.t )
S'
2311%0 Horizon Cir. Rng Li
Burnsville, M1: 5 73*
2�-";12024- Rober, Landscaping iai `e" L, iWSp 11` 0.CIL, ia:7 _,tV . t=
V 686.E-6 $5,886.0.6
.anO ve n, 7Yte i• R.n l.i
g
Bloomington, MM 55:431
i:_c£ccahl£ 40unt: $201,840.00
77
Front icct Ccsz; v . I .150
.iv£nue Special
N55£sC£nL5
Square Coot Cosy: h.01111 152
A . A
�„
,�- , i±t,Y Front Foot Square
ap
Parcel s ltrm'ner Code Description Front rt .Quare Ft Assessfi.+erit A 5C sment Assessment
----------------------------------------1--------------- ---------------------
---------------'----_^^'-n------------------------- -----------------
-711 L•tn C... i^, rAACIA /;� '1 1f± ;i Gc. 377n rr
'9li(lit{-1 `{()y E. Luy=bels u ✓ct 1L, iri_ ii5 (.((S _�7�v.vUU.vv IV.3v .,,v.33
11201 l;ptcn Awe. S. n'!g it
-..7
rieomingter,±, MN y r�,,�:�,
Roy E. Cogswell 1� Ll
.:, 0.00 69017.00 $0.00 $976.7(1 $976.7(1
27-C%ayr�tl-ri --
11201 Upton Ave. S. Valiey Rich is'
Bloomington. Mn 515307
n7_ _ i5 L5 ri
0.f)() 10420K.00 $(1.110 X1,475.76 �1�$1,47.76�, .•.I,.vC,� 0 William H. Cooke
55:2 ii?ca±a5 Ave. C. Maras Add'n
kinneapolis, MIN, 55410
217 57006-0 Lundgren Properties 16 L6 iii 0.00 104280.00 (!1.00 1,475.79 :1,475.79
5600, 35th rive. S. liar a5 Add'n
Minneapolis, MN 55417
77-x,57007-0 wt•l, F r ,1t,.. 17 L7 '_r..1 7z' 1V4_t9.(i(t 7, .t�.iL. y }•t;.nr c� 1 =4
s.i i , vltsiam H. ,,c -
5512 Thomas Ave. S. Boras Add'n
Minneapolis, bin 55410
i? ` j U.(+� s .I,i.(,Gffl, (%, .
-0437n102-0 Daniel Nhone7 _ L .i
❑i±9L C. 13th AvE. i'LZ 4r'7
j -C
Shakopee,
Wil
333,/
27-(t4 (( -(: john E. Miller 19 Ler`± 111;.00 1.00 ._,��.:.ii.; .L•: -
9616 E. 17- it Av£. 11LS a24
Shakopee, MN 55379•
27-04z,. 4-0 Daniel Cheever 2:(1 L BY 100.(10 (;,(}(t $711176.07X0.0(1 X3,5'(1.(15
9(O E. l7,th Ave. FLS K4
L j s 55770
21 L 'c" 11'1(1.(%li t't,(,(t sa :•=i%.t3 11:1
27-0433005-0 Raymond Moen '
F: t-'4
?(164 _. 13th Ave. _
±
Shakopee, tiff 5J,770!
:2 L lOG 6 .0(t :y:i,(,ij vi..i?Y.lb
21''0'4 vi9-i% Robert K. Stewart
11305 Fiver liii'As Dr. NLS 3_`4
t
uurnsvlile, .11,k, 5:;,.3r
21-:143016-0 Raymond E. risen
9;;64 E. 13th Ave. r:_5
Shakopee, 55377
,ti^. •1
T S�-AC�b£rt K. StciarL27_- :1sD J 24 Len
0.00 15000.00
11705 River Bills Dr. E.LS #?�
rur n5vilie, MIN ��
Front Foot Cost: r3
n�
2t ry.., i'` +^`
l:Y�i 4E5UE - 3F£Ci ai ii4xx"vc4ei5 Souar e toot lost: _ 114t.
har Front Foot-- SQUare Foot-------otal
Parcel _ 0n.cr [:n?c Lp-rri of ion Front �� - r t
- - r-' ---- - F: scceccr.cn- n, ;cce;;;aF:,=
-t-� fi(,c)Crt i':. 4'rcrt [5 (. A!"ir (1,(I�1 1.,01i�),1117 3:1, Ii) 'ice` t7
117'-505 River Hills Dr. rLS Tr
537
2
Burnsville, MN .iJti�:7
.5- {i •i! .5 } St - t '1 1 uN0 n A Cn T t5 .£�1 "1 n tt,,.-.
[,-.43..1;-J r;e�£rt Y Et;ar� [6 r) V V 15000.33 FC. 10 $212..:7 <Y 27
1;3115 River Hills Ur. RLS 7#274
5337
X
Furi45vli!£, !viii ,iJ:`3/
Li vi•illr:-{r Robert K. Stewart 21 L i 11,1111 1510100.00 00 L1L.�1
1i3f15 River Hills Dr. RIS' ai4
curnsvllle, MN 5`3x7
043018-0 Robert K. Stewart - n
[� PIG L F h ',i,iifi inu'J:if1V.011 $0.00 $4,011.96
ti r,
11305 River Hill's Dr. R:1c -r.i4
Burnsville, iii 55337
27-;;4301';-f: Al Roherg andSCapn29 riL IR° O,iLi2uz
x .Jl ii,t7.�1 i11Li
43:14' W. 99th st. RLS #24
Bloomington, MIN 55379
=7-;343'11-C :irha-d Kessler - L 9V
0.00 6. $0.60 $0.00 $0,00
01
% 7 E. i'th =eve. ;LS X23
Shakopee, MN 55379
r tilt
..'L14Ji1ii1 �--v l Steve[? G. VEide 31 L i1,i1Q (%.{ift #12,01 fi,()fl `rV`I4K,
9055 E. 13th Ave. RLS SLf
,Laiic'p££� !1 55379
u. Krause ,,? `4
:)1TJVV1 V \£ll 2 L Flu Af,aVV -.0 o
V.
>.iv
E. l:Yh Ave Mi 024
Srai:a a, NSI 5:1379
!7-(1430108-0 Ne 41 J. Krause J3 � -j4i 0,iifi l'2,0;2
E.
l'V
9085 t. 107th Ave RLS II24
i
Shakopee, M11 = 19
i
c7-f2i 87.4.7-T4 Tv' 7 . h ll' a1E T4 L eFs .5 C? f2 A .t rl Tli+ .•
� (.I)J •r ,hc'rl£_ n. ren : : b. o 0.00 .fair rv.=_ {ii,Ar-.
9081 E. 13ti1 AVE. RLS - "
7#2»
Shakopee, Mil 55379
271-0W 64 -0 6 7
-0 lerr LRice
e ,=+Y7a4� i.00 :�?,911.78 ;..
L `F , 1 _
9100 E. 13th Ave. R'S A24
Shakopee, MN 55379
Ili,ml TLT4-1 2.L, T1l JU•:2.t1}! 1141,2Qii.l%V $60,550.111 7L1.11,5740.1111
---------7777--
---------------
l
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judi Simac, City Planner
RE: Appeal of Conditional Use Permit No. 471
DATE: October 1, 1986
Introduction:
At their September 4, 1986 meeting the Planning Commission
granted a conditional use permit, for outdoor storage of
transportation equipment in the I-1 zone, to Les Koehnen. The
approval was subject to the following conditions:
1. The entire storage area must be entirely enclosed with
a solid fence eight feet in height. The fence shall be
setback ten feet from the rear and side lot lines.
Within the setbacks a major coniferous tree must be
planted every fifteen feet at a minimum six foot
height.
2 . All storage associated with the uses within the
structure must be contained within the fenced area.
3 . Annual Planning Commission review.
Background:
The decision of the Planning Commission has been appealed to
the City Council. The appellants include a list of approximately
35 residents. Please find attached a copy of the appeal, minutes
from the Planning Commission meeting and the staff report to the
Planning Commission.
Action Requested:
Offer Conditional Use Permit Resolution of the City Council
No. Cc-471 and move for its approval or denial. Approval to
include recommended conditions of the Planning Commission.
Attachments
tw
Y.
SEP 2 1
i1i•!�E C)f
c
-Zig-GLS �Y�j
���.� � ��✓� c �.� BGG-��_
l
O
J � Y
' / A
t ✓ ti n,'
f1�C� -74a -
00 -
1
75-1I
vA
i
f
_ y , . tte ,.- _ rale
V2_n:'I aldeghemZ`QcV,ne moved to open the ),abli c hear-LnE to consider a
a request for a Conditional use Perri- to allow outdoor storage of
transportation equipment upon the property located at 1F03 Eagle
Creek ylvd. in a light industrial zoning district. L'.otion carried
unanimously. .
'Discussion ensued on exactly what kind of storage would be involved .
The applicant, ester i.oehr.en, f30'� 1st Street, Shakopee , ctated
the stcr 1 � ^th; ^T from a •tb ��' -notor t
a^e could consist s � o� an _ ._ �^ o w .,cam .. .�.c „c �o a
T� �0 3 what junk vehicles must be stored 30 days
seili . _ is s „a aW
There ti:iil be no vrecking on this site just storage .
A"r. Olson, 940 Eagle Creek, said that they propose to put as many
vehicles as they can within the fenced in area.
Kr. Schmitt, 1797 Eagle+Creek plvd. stated that heisaFainst this
proposal, he believes it would be an eyeTore to the residents
Vit-hin the area.
Dave Yarusso , 1812 Eagle Creek Blvd. said that he does not feel
it would lower the property values .
Ar. Brown, 302 Shawnee Trail, stated that this is not a junk yard.
This is a towing and storage facility and it is an excellent service
for the city.
Chairman Csaja asked if there v;as anyone from the audience who
wished to address this issue . There was no response .
Foudray/Schmitt moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried
unanimously.
Foudray/Schmitt offered to grant Conditional use Permit #471 and
move for its adoption based on the following recommendations :
1. The entire sto-rage area must be entirely enclosed with
a solid fence B feet in height. The fence shall be set
back 30 feet from the rear property line and 10 feet
from side lot lines . ,' ilhin the setbacks a major deciduous
tree must be planted every 30 feet.
2 . 211 storage associated with the uses within the structure
,must be contained within the fenced area.
Pomerenke/Rockne offered an amendment to the main motion that a
major coniferous tree , such as spruce or pine be planted every 15 -feet
and with 6 foot height. MM'Llion carried unanimously.
City Administrator stated that there should be a review of the
conditional use permit after one year.
Commissioner Foudray called the question. Call of the question
fails with Pomerenke and Czaja opposed.
Main motion dies because of lack cf majority.
Schmitt/ ,ockne moved for a minute recess . 1,-,otion carried
unanimously.
f6
PLAN„iNG COMMISSION
September 4 , 1986
Page -4-
Chairman Czaja called the meeting back to order.
Schmitt/Foudray moved to grant conditional use permit '471 for
purposes of operating an outdoor storage lot and for purposes
of operating an impound lot, and move its adoption, subject to the
following conditions :
1. The entire storage area must be entirely enclosed with
a solid fence 8 feet in height. The fence shall be
setback 10 feet from the rear and side lot lines. Within
the setbacks a major coniferous tree must be planted every
15 ft. at a minimum 6 ft. height.
2 . All storage associated with the uses within the structure
must be contained within the fenced area.
3 . Annual Planning Commission review.
Motion carried with Comm. Czaja opposed.
Foudray/VanMaldeghem moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 9: 50 p.m.
Judi Simac
City Planner
Carol L. Schultz
Recording Secretary
MEMO TO: Shakopee Planning Commission
FROM: Judi Simac, City Planner
DATE: August 26 , 1986
APPLICANT: Lester Koehnen
LOCATION: 1803 Eagle Creek Blvd. ( SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 Sect. 5 and
NW 1/4 of NW 1/4 of Sect. 8 )
ZONING: I-1 Light Industrial
LAND USE: Existing R.V. and Fork Lift Repair
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 11. 32 , Subd. 3A 13 ; 11. 05 ,
Subd. 5
FINDINGS REQUIRED: Section 11. 04 , Subd. 6
SURROUNDING LAND USES: North - R-4 zoning agricultural use
East - I-1 zoning storage facility
South - R-2 zoning residential
West - R-4 zoning vacant
PUBLIC UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer is available to the site,
however existing on site septic and water are
proposed to continue.
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to
conduct outdoor storage of transportation equipment in
a light industrial zoning district.
CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The site include a existing block structure which contains a
fork lift and r.v. repair business. The applicant proposes
to use the northern portion of the site to store impounded
transportation equipment. At this time the tenants of the
structure will continue to operate the repair businesses.
2 . The applicant intends to use approx. 1 1/2 acres of the site
to store impounded vehicles within a fence. The City Code
requires junk yards and automobile wrecking facilities to be
completely screened from roads or developed areas by a solid
fence or wall 8 feet or more in height, maintained in good
condition and screened with suitable planting. The code
also requires that the storage yard not be within 100 ft. of
any City thoroughfare.
3 . The proposed site is at a lower elevation than the
residential area of Shakopee Ave. , however there are a lot
of mature trees on the slope and south side of CSAH 16 which
appear to screen the storage area. The site will be more
visible from these homes in the winter months.
4 . Existing on the site are some vehicles and materials which
appear to be "junk" . The area should be cleaned up and the
repair business which will continue in the building should
be required to keep their storage within the fenced area
also.
5 . There are two accesses to the site from CSAR 16 . Parking
for customers is adequately provided on the gravel surface.
A row of mature trees are existing along the west property
line which can be credited for screening, however additional
plantings must be placed along the north, east and south of
the storage area, along with the fence.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff is concerned that the proposed outdoor storage of the
automobiles will impede the normal and orderly development and
improvement of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant
in the area. The property was excluded from the Racetrack
District and remains industrial, however the use may prohibit the
timely development of the adjacent multi-family and RTD property.
In addition the use may constitute a nuisance which will be
disturbing to neighboring properties. Lastly, the City has not
had a good experience with control and containment of other
impound lots within the City limits.
Staff has found that adequate access, off-street parking and
loading exists on the site and the use in consistent with the
zoning district. Should the Planning Commission approve the
conditional use permit application the following conditions are
recommended:
1. The entire storage area must be entirely enclosed with a
solid fence 8 feet in height. The fence shall be set back
30 feet from the rear property line and 15 feet from side
lot lines . Within the setbacks a major deciduous tree must
be planted every 30 feet.
2 . All storage associated with the uses within the structure
must be contained within the fenced area.
Action Reauested:
Offer a motion to deny Conditional Use Permit No. 471 and
move for its adoption based upon the following findings:
1. The conditional use will be injurious to the use and
enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for
purposes already permitted and could diminish and impair
property values within the immediate vicinity.
2. The conditional use will impede the normal and orderly
development of surrounding vacant property.
3 . The use will constitute a nuisance with increased traffic of
tow trucks arriving 24 hours a day and for City control and
enforcement.
tw
R 4-, �z
i ........ ...
B2 : �
IAL
Y � +
fj1J � QvT�;?T• 1
R4
. I
>
- w
.. \•ley � � _ I
f
------------
r'
i
1
i
1/o r;r ,
Apr 0
O p V o U o J p U d D `✓
J
I T
3 To
12 d•A.
0
1 -
I �rp � oS � �
PA rk
� o
i
0
D
r-- 'A" AREA svu-r� 11* 7-,4,',S r—
,�pRoY.
.��L L ,
a�
fy
I < `
w o u l d I r k r h s It-, o 1 r) i s
1..
O he
0-1-tt-t e-Tit I rR 6� CI L-A l�OUh G 1
In re of rebs to -the- out al oo r s-Lo rcq c- o-F
` uhK �eh� cles.
-� e e-1 -t'ha3t -C h ere. 5 cv t'ears I n
rth� cr'� feria -dor ranfi'► n C�n� i �► orlcv�
Os e- er rY, ,t -t ha_.fi aL' e, not Met
Th's Pro re-rt/ w I ) a
m� ro�ert j va,l u C, '- 0--t hper
a V eco., <Iu e -t a J u N I,
how e, a�P p ro X i rn ale,
lvrt on -Lhe- m
who '1 ,5 V n - fo
aG {t cc. ) oS S
-Fo ►- s u
L)-)h ch co i I b eJ t h o u s Q-ncl s d
o f
L r
L) T)) T he �oJs - � ►
p s u
//AS oil SAnv4do f- 7-AeP ba PO2eA7`l
V,4LL)4 rUD ��%�e
y
1
7chat th 1,,5 u1 i 1 h u 1' t t{i �e-
nor rnoj or, orjex ) y p 1y) en.t.-
o-r- -the- s u (- roun c. i b vo,Ca.r)T
� Wk i Ch o-y e- -dor
n-\ u l -t- �a nn , 1� &e v e I o� m e-n--L ,
-r�� north -+ w e s-t propet-ty i S
The South prop eCt � I S T
� � sialehoL,
J- Th; nk the storms e. o-F
T-h� 1 %---o
no o » e .
-Fee ha-t t- , S ar'e (4- -t c, uj Y1
W ► 1 b e, the t'o Lx)t h o`f- Sho-k o pe n
r, -t h E- L)tUV-e, w, OU Ct h 1
See -thy cLelvela(prnen-t
I�; do o r tt,� � e✓ � 5 a�
cLf-,v e- 10 f m e pt 'R q v- I lk aj t r n
�--
m
c�c i Y\ t Y) 't h e r ct
4e-e- ) 7=h a Tb e 016 n a-t ho-V
cJr&i h aj e- on -tA i` s T l'o rp e r-T y .
Th ) ass o,-� ti �5 - r e 5 �t o n
Trams r� � s s �a n -� 1 u � �. •�- b c��t-�.�r y
co d /at l� "h ro u0111
rams emu>S e, ra u n CL vv O-t.4- P01 C 1'10 K
a s uj e_ Po 11 v t 1 0' Y\, 7-v
�i1 Y i r 6 n m Ery
�Q�zGUrd
b e
`� th i n c r ears T ram i o f 7-v uJ
TcuGKs car � v 't n a ht's , au
7.
rth e r w` l ber a.n d e- 1 r s rm y `fi T.
o�,lSa -Feei �
-1-ho-t 4 - such �
hen is � -rh "C- shoo lal b�
se- Gur , ty � S Them e hrs
cL dc 7 Ats a) uJ c e K,
E e 1 �a s v S e.,
h
\0 1th the CvMTrehens ) Ue, 0" 04,-
�h �
ro-ft ✓Yl N nt ec
rte of0u?l k + S�1 ofiPP .
10c,
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk Cv
RE: Beer, Wine, and Liquor Licensees not in Compliance
with the City Code.
DATE: October 3 , 1986
Introduction:
On September 2nd Council set a public hearing for October 7 , 1986
to consider the suspension of beer, wine, and liquor licensees
which are not in compliance with the requirements of the City
code, section 5 . 09 subd. 3 .
Background:
In 1985 the number of insurance companies writing liquor
liability insurance decreased substantially. The few remaining
companies, because of the work load, were unable to issue new
policies and actually deliver them prior to Shakopee' s renewal
date of July lst. Many Minnesota municipalities also renew their
licenses on July 1st. Because of this problem, Council has
agreed to accept a certificate of insurance and require the
policy to be placed on file within 90 days after effective date
of the license.
When license renewals were mailed out on July 1st, licensees were
also mailed a memo advising them that they should file their
policy with the City within 90 days. On September 16th, all
licensees, not having done so, were reminded to file their
policies with the City. In addition, they were advised that if
their policy was not filed and approved by the City Attorney,
that the Council would hold a public hearing on October 7th to
determine whether or not to suspend or revoke their license
because of non-compliance with the City code.
All notices were mailed certified and were received by the
licensees within the 15 day notice period with two exceptions.
No formal action could be taken on these two exceptions at this
hearing. Instead, a new hearing date would have to be set and
notice served. R. Hanover did not receive their notice, because
no one was present to sign for it. Minnesota Concessions was not
mailed a notice because I thought I had their policy on file, but
after taking a closer look, I did not have the whole policy.
t
The following licensees have not filed their liquor liability
policy or if they did it is incomplete. (An updating will be on
the Council table Tuesday evening) :
*SuperAmerica Stations , Inc.
Speedway Concessions , Inc.
*Pizza Huts of the Northwest, Inc.
Holiday Stationstores , Inc.
Tom Thumb Food Markets , Inc.
*Coll-Frahm Inc .
Brooks Superette, Inc. - Marschall Road
Brooks Superette, Inc. - #42-Canterbury Road
*Freternal Order of Eagles Aerie #4120
R. Hanover, Inc.
Minnesota Concessions, Inc.
*The Pullman Club, Inc.
S.E.L.F. , Inc. (Granny' s)
Valley Liquors, Inc.
*Veterans of Foreign Wars , Post No. 4046
*Policies have been received for these licensees , but they do not
include the 10 day cancellation clause. They have been so
notified and are in the process of getting us the necessary
endorsement.
Pizza Huts policy expires January 1, 1987 and they have been
asked to provide an endorsement extending the Policy to July 1,
1987. Holiday Stationstores, Inc. policy expires December 1,
1986 . They are in the process of renewing all their policies and
will send me a copy of the new policy when it is issued. I was
quoted approximately three weeks and when issued it will be for a
three year term. Although the certificates of insurance show
coverage until July 1, 1987 , in these cases examination of the
actual policy showed something different. In these two cases,
one policy covers many stores and getting the policy to expire on
a specific date for Shakopee may not be possible.
Alternatives :
Come October 7th, there may very well be some licensees who have
not filed their policy in proper form, and Council will have to
decide on how to proceed.
Because there are only a few companies writing liquor liability
insurance, there is very little choice for our licensees on where
they take their business. If the insurance company will not
deliver a policy by July lst of each year, the City has two
choices. One is to actually close businesses without an
insurance policy and see if the insurance company will change
their operation to get the policies out in a more timely manner,
or continue to allow the 90 day filing period we have now. There
is additional staff time spent with this procedure. It is almost
a duplication of time spent at renewal time. Certainly the City
doesn' t wish to put businesses out of business, so this may be
the lessor of two evils.
How to handle businesses not in compliance with the City code on
October 7, 1986 , by having on file with the City of Shakopee, a
proper liquor insurance policy:
1) Suspend license until proper policy is on file
2) Extend time to file policy
3 ) Amend City code to not require filing of policy
4 ) Don' t exforce City code
Recommendation:
I recommend alternative number two, because this is the first
year the beer licensees are being required to file their policy.
t I believe all the liquor licensees will file their policies by
November 4th and I believe most will be in by Tuesday. I believe
that the beer licensees who may not file their policies by
November 4th could still operate their businesses because beer is
incidental to their operation.
Action Recommended:
Direct staff to notify all beer and liquor licensees, not
currently in compliance with the City code, that, if they are not
in compliance with the City code by November 4 , 1986, the Council
will, on November 4, 1986 , suspend their license until they are
in compliance.
1 �c
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Beer, Wine, and Liquor Licensees not in compliance
with the City Code
DATE: October 7 , 1986
This is an update to the memo dated October 3 , 1986 with the same
title.
The following is a list of licensees not in compliance with the
City code:
SuperAmerica Stations, Inc. - December 1 renewal date in the
process of renewing for a 3-yr.
period.
Speedway Concessions, Inc. - Asked for endorsement adding
licensee name.
Pizza Huts of the NW, Inc. - Asked for endorsement extending
policy to July 1, 1987 . Also
10 day cancellation clause.
Holiday Stationstores, Inc. - Waiting for 10 day canc. clause
Call-Prahm, Inc. - Waiting for 10 day canc. clause
R. Hanover, Inc. - Waiting for 10 day canc. clause
The Pullman Club, Inc. - Waiting for 10 day canc. clause
Minnesota Concessions, Inc. - Waiting for 10 day canc. clause
S .E.L. F. Inc . (Granny' s) - Waiting for 10 day canc . clause
Brooks Superette, Inc. - Need liquor policy & canc. clause
(Marschall Road)
Brooks Superette, Inc. - Need liquor policy & canc. clause
( #42 Canterbury Rd. )
Summary•
1) We have a policy from all licensees, except the policy from
the Brooks Superettes does not include the liquor liability.
2 ) Two policies expire prior to July 1, 1986 . If they cannot
be extended, the City may have to accept them as is.
3 ) One policy needs a name change which should be no problem.
4 ) Nine policies need cancellation clauses. They should be able
to be provided by November 4th.
Recommended Action:
1) Direct staff to notify all beer and liquor licensees, not
currently in compliance with the City code, that, if they
are not in compliance with the City code by November 4, 1986,
the Council will .on- Nov-.- 4,- -1986-,- suspend their-license until they
are in compliance .
2 ) Direct staff to notify R. Hanover, Inc. and Minnesota
Concessions, Inc. that a hearing is set for November 4 , 1986 ,
at 8: 30 p.m. to consider the supension or revocation of their
liquor license if they are not in compliance with the re-
quirements of the City code, section 5. 09 subd. 3 .
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judi Simac, City Planner
RE: Prairie House 1st Addition
Park Dedication Fee
DATE: October 3 , 1986
INTRODUCTION:
The City Council approved the final plat of Prairie House 1st
Addition on June 17 , 1986 . One of the conditions of approval was
that in lieu of land dedication, cash payment should be made to
the park fund at the time building permits are issued. The cash
payment is determined in accordance with Section 12. 07, Subd. 5
of the City Code.
BACKGROUND•
The park cash payment is based upon market value, determined by
the County Assessor. The value of the entire 58 acres in the
plat is $303 , 400 . The fee is equal to $10 , 000 plus 2% of the
value which exceeds $200 , 000 .
The standard procedure is to figure the fee per acre and then
apply that to each lot depending on the size. Staff has computed
the park fee for each lot in the plat for inclusion in the
Developer ' s Agreement.
The developers of Prairie House 1st Addition have submitted a
written request to spread the park dedication fees over the 36
acres of the plat to be developed. (See attached) The remaining
22 acres are two lots which have been sold to the federal
government (U.S. Fish and Wildlife) . No construction on this
property is anticipated in the near future. In addition, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife cannot obligate itself by signing the
Developer ' s Agreement, ensuring future payment of the park fee.
At this time the park fee for Outlot A is not in the Developer' s
Agreement because it must be replatted before a building permit
is issued. Block 1, Lots 1 and 2 are left to absorb the park fee
for Outlot B and Block 2, Lot 1 (federal land) .
ALTERNATIVES :
1. Require the park fee for Outlot B and Block 2, Lot 1
(federal land) be paid before the plat is filed. Although
the developer has indicated that park fees were not taken
into account when the sale to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
was structured, the developer did violate the subdivision
regulations by selling off lots before the plat was filed.
1
2. Require the park fee for Outlot B and Block 2, Lot 1 be
paid when a building permit is issued for either Lot 1
or 2, Block 1, whichever occurs first. (Outlot B and
Block 2, Lot 1, fee is $6 , 487 . 62) .
3 . Require the park fee for Outlot B and Block 2, Lot 1 be
paid when the building permit is issued for the second
and last _lot in Block 1 .
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative #2.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer a motion to direct staff to amend the Prairie House 1st
Addition Developer ' s Agreement to require the park dedication fee
for Outlot B and Block 2, Lot 1 be paid when a building permit is
issued for either Lot 1 or 2, Block 1, whichever occurs first.
(FOR REFERENCE)
Park Fee Prairie House 1st Addition
Block 1 :
Lot 1 = $ 441. 11
Lot 2 = $ 832 . 28
Block 2 :
Lot 1 = $3 , 100 . 24
Outlot A = $4 , 188 . 45
Outlot B = $3, 387. 38
*An area of . 57 acres will be dedicated as r-o-w. No fee
which would have been $118 . 60 .
JS :cah
�61 C Q/
• FBF, � ��
BRADFORD CLQ PROCHNOW -',ITS
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
f1.6 NORTH FRANKLIN STREET-RIVERSIDE PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
CURTIS M.BRADFORD r. TELEPHONE:
DANK.PROCHNOW 0,W$87-1710
October 3 , 1986
Ms . Judi Simac
City Planner
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee , MN 55379-1379
RE: Prairie House First Addition
Dear Ms . Simac :
Please accept this letter as a request to have the
park donation fees regarding Prairie House First Addition
placed on the 36 acres to be developed.
The 22 acres sold to the Federal Government is not
a part of the development and they do not anticipate construction
on that land in the near future . The great bulk of that , in
fact , will be a park in a matter of speaking.
Park donation fees were not taken into account when
that sale was structured and I would like them to be placed
on the 36 acres so that it can be properly anticipated in
future sales .
Thank you.
Very truly yours ,
%7�•
Curtis M. Bradford
CMB: sb
HAND DELIVER
�C,qV,
TIOURY
D O W N 5
October 3, 1986
Mr. John Anderson
City Administrator
City of Shakopee
129 E. First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear John :
RE: Night Racing Canterbury Downs
Pursuant to our earlier correspondence regarding night
Harness racing at Canterbury Downs, we have had further verbal
communication with the Division of Air Quality, Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency.
The Agency has given us no preliminary indication that they
would oppose racing beginning at 7 : 00 p.m. on weekday evenings
through November 30, 1986 on a test basis. We understand this
temporary condition would not require a formal application
process by us to the MPGA. The MPCA has asked that they be
kept appraised of the attendance numbers during the test period.
Based on these preliminary findings, please be advised of
our intention to proceed with weekday evening racing beginning
Wednesday, October 8, with the first race to begin each evening
at 7:00 p.m. It is our belief this change will increase
attendance to the track and result. in increased economic
benefit to the City of Shakopee throughout the balance of
Harness meeting.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. ,
Yours sin ,
V
Fri- Corri an
DYr�tor ofAperations
cc: J. Michael Valentine, Director, Division of Air Quality
William Crawford, District 5, Mn. DOT
Daniel J. Lutenegger, Barton-Aschman
Ken Ashfeld, City of Shakopee
John Mullan, Barton-Aschman
Stan Bowker, Canterbury Downs
Brad Larson, Scott County
Canterbury Downs/1100 Canterbury Road/P.O. Box 508/Shakopee, Minnesota 55379/(612) 445-7/223
October 3, 1986
Page 2
additional background monitoring to determine the impact of this
change in hours of operation . As discussed, we will work with the
staff of the Agency to obtain the data required by your staff to
properly evaluate a permanent change in the hours of operation .
We realize that the change in location of the Agency office has
been very disruptive and appreciate the prompt consideration the
staff has given to our request . We look forward to working with
you in the coming weeks to finalize our understanding as to the
information to be gathered during the experimental test period .
The September 29, 1986 letter from Barton-Aschman
Associates , Inc. , the consultant for Canterbury Downs Racetrack ,
is accurate with respect to what will be done other than the
initial start date being October 8 rather October 15 .
Vim) truly ours , -,
Raymt� d A. Haik
RAH/jf
cc : Brooks Fields
Stan Bowker
Fred C. Corrigan
Bruce Malkerson
Daniel J . Lutenegger
_,3an Anderson
9159f
POPHAM, HAIK,SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN & DOTY, LTD.
4344 IDS CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE
612-33_3-4800
c-u.i"rFi hpi -u.'vvi'ULIAM TAUTS.i Aiv DAVID L.HASM MALL KATHLEEN A.BLATZ
ROGER W.SCHNOBRICH MICHAEL 0.FREEMAN 612-344-0603 KATHLEEN M.MARTIN MICHAEL O.CHRISTENSON
DENVER KAUFMAN HOWARD SAM MYERS,1U JOHN C.CHILDS J.MICHAEL SCHWARTZ
DAVID S.DOTY THOMAS C.D'AOUILA DOUGLAS P.SEATON LARAYE M.OSBORNE
ROBERT A.MINISH LARRY D.ESPEL 1240 AMHOIST TOWER THOMAS E.SANNER LOUIS P. SMITH
ROLFE A.WORDEN JANIE S.MAYERON 345 ST.PETER STREET BRUCE B.Mc PHEETERS FRANCIS J.CONNOLLY
G.MARC WHITEHEAD THOMAS J.BARRETT SAINT PAUL,MINNESOTA 55102 GARY D.BLACKFORD BRUCE H. LITTLE
BRUCE D.WILLIS JAMES A.PAY NE TELEPHONE 612-333-4878 SCOTT E.RICHTER MARK F.PALMA
FREDERICK S.RICHARDS DAVID A.JONE5 GREGORY L.WILMES RUSSELL S.PONESSA
G.ROBERT JOHNSON LEE E.SHEEHY SUITE 2400 PAUL J.LINSTROTH BRYAN L.CRAWFORD
GARY R.MACOM BER ALAIN FRECON 1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET SCOTT A.SMITH DAVID K.RYDEN
ROBERT S.BURK PATRICIA A.JENSEN DENVER, COLORADO 80202 ELIZABETH A.THOMPSON OWEN E.HERRNSTADT
HUGH V.PLUN KETT,III LESLIE TELEPHONE 303-893-1200 GILLETTE 7ELECOPIER 303-893-2194 KEITH J.HALLELAND MATTHEW E.DAMON
FREDERICK C.BROWN MICHAEL T.NILAN
MARK B.PETERSON
THOMAS K.BERG ROBERT H.LYNN SUITE 300 SOUTH D.RANDALL BOYER
JAMES R.STEILEN THOMAS M. SIPKIN5 1800 M STREET.N.W. BRIAN N.JOHNSON
JAMES B.LOCKHART ROBERT C.MOILANEN WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036 TIMOTHY W.KUCK OF COUNSEL
ALLEN W.HINDERAKER THOMAS F.NELSON TELEPHONE 202-828-5300 JULIE A.SWEITZER FRED L.MORRISON
CLIFFORD M.GREENE THOMAS J.RADIO TELECOPIER 202-828-5316 THOMAS C.MIELENHAUSEN
DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
October 3 , 1986
Mr . J. Michael Valentine, Director
Division of Air Quality
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
1935 West County Road B2
Roseville , MN 55113-2785
Re : Indirect Source Permit ( ISP 84-3 ) for Construction of
the Canterbury Downs' Racetrack , Shakopee , Minnesota
Dear Mr . Valentine :
This letter will confirm our discussions and express the
appreciation of our client , Canterbury Downs Racetrack, for the
time of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to facilitate an
experimental change in the hours of operation at the racetrack .
Based upon the preliminary findings and advice of our consultant,
Daniel J. Lutengger of Barton-Aschman Associates , Inc . , Canterbury
Downs Racetrack is proceeding to announce their intention to
undertake evening racing beginning Wednesday, October 8, 1986,
with the first race to begin each evening at 7 : 00 p.m. It is the
belief of our client that this change will be a more suitable time
for operation and should not cause any significant problems .
We recognize that these new hours are on an experimental
basis to determine the feasibility of such an operation and that
any permanent change in hours of operation to 7: 00 p.m , may
require MPCA approval of a modification of the existing Indirect
Source Permit 84-3. As we proceed, we will conduct to the
OCT 6 1986
C'IT`E" OF SR�p.KOP�c
MEMO TO: City Council
FROM: LeRoy Houser, Building Official
RE: Police Station Roof
DATE : September 30, 1986
INTRODUCTION:
The police station roof is still leaking after having it patched
in June.
BACKGROUND:
The roof repair is budgeted for 1987 . I don' t think we should
wait until 1987 . We are having infiltration of water into
Bisek' s office causing mold in the carpet and paneling. It is
also causing window casement problems in the highway patrol
office.
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Do the roof repair now before any further damage occurs .
2. Wait and do the roof repair in IDS7 , as budgeted.
RECOMMENDATION:
Have the roof work on the police station done in 1986 before
winter.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Authorize staff to advertise for bids for a carbile roof and
offer Resolution No. 2637 , A Resolution Amending Resolution
No. 2457 Adopting the 1986 Budget, and move for its adoption.
LH:cah
Attachment
RESOLUTION 2637
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 2457 ADOFTING THE 1986 BUDGET
WHEREAS, the City Council hasa adopted a budget for the Fiscal year,
and
kTHEREAS, changing conditions and circumstances warrant amending the budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAROFEE,
KINNESOTA, that the appropriations are increased as follows:
Fund Catezory Division Amount
General 01. 4230 311 31 Police $10, 000
and the increases are offset or funded by increases (decreases) in the following
accounts:
Fund Account/CateZcrr Division Amount
General 01. 4991 911 91 Contingency $10, 000
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this 7th day of October 1986.
*savor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1986.
City Attorney
MEMO TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
Re: Renewal of Employment Agreement between the City of
Shakopee and Barry Stock, Administrative Intern
DATE: October 3 , 1986
Introduction•
The City has several classifications of employees. One
classification is Contractual Employee. Barry Stock has been
employed by the City of Shakopee for a two year period under a
contract that expires October 15, 1986. The purpose of this memo
is to review Mr. Stock' s employment status and consider renewal
of his contract.
Background-
Employment Review. Mr. Stock has served the City of Shakopee for
two years as an Administrative Intern and in that capacity
staffed our Cable Advisory Committee and the Energy and
Transportation Committee. He has done an exceptional job in
staffing both committees and in carrying out other duties
assigned to him. Mr. Stock is an employee the City should strive
to keep based on his performance of the past two year.
Philosophy of Administrative Intern Position. The normal
approach of cities to the use of administrative interns is to
make the position a stepping stone position. Under this
philosophy a city does not reclassify the position when a
particular intern has been with the city for one or two years,
but keeps the position classified as an internship thus providing
the employee with an incentive to seek a higher paying position
in that city or some other city. The question for the City of
Shakopee is whether or not this is the philosophy it wishes to
keep for this position.
Complication created by the Comparable Worth Study. The
philosophy discussed above has served this City and others well.
The recent development of comparable worth has created a problem
for Shakopee and other cities, because the level of
responsibility assigned to the position has "qualified" the
person filling the position (based upon internal task
comparisons) for a higher classification and a higher pay range.
There is currently no city that we. can look to to find examples
of how this dilemma might be resolved. Further complicating the
issue for the City of Shakopee is the possibility that several
other permanent employees are "qualified" for salary increases or
reclassification based upon the same internal task comparisons.
Alternatives:
The Council must make two decisions based upon the circumstances
outlined above. The first decision is whether or not to renew
Mr. Stock' s employment agreement. The second decision is whether
or not any reclassification or wage increases should be included
in that contract renewal. The alternatives available are as
follows:
1. Renew Mr. Stock' s employment agreement with few changes.
This would continue his status at the present wage and
salary classification. This alternative would surely
encourage him to seek employment elsewhere because he is
currently being paid a low wage rate at $6. 31 per hour and
does not have the appropriate title for the level of work he
has been performing.
2 . Renew our employment contract with Mr. Stock and incorporate
in it language which would make him eligible for all
comparable worth changes when implemented. A draft
employment agreement is attached and incorporates language
which would implement this alternative. Because the City
has been discussing implementation of comparable worth for
nearly 12 months this may appear to be so much like
alternative no. 1 that Mr. Stock would be again looking for
work elsewhere.
3 . Maintain Mr. Stock' s employment classification as a contract
employee and/or make his position a permanent employee
position. Either alternative could be accompanied with a
salary adjustment and a reclassification using our Pay Plan.
Under that plan Barry Stock would be eligible for
classification as an Administrative Assistant and would be
eligible for a pay increase when placed on the four step Pay
Plan for that position. This would represent a pay increase
from $13 ,125 per year as an Administrative Intern to a
minimum rate of $ 18 , 989 per year ( 9. 13/hr) if placed on
step one of our current pay plan for Administrative
Assistants. This alternative would certainly enhance the
City' s chances in keeping Barry Stock as an employee.
Furthermore it would be recognizing the level of
responsibility he has been handling for the past two years.
The problem with this alternative is that we are making
reclassification and salary adjustments for him of a
"comparable worth nature" , but not for other employees.
Recommendation:
The City has been able to create a good deal of pay equity and
solve a number of personal problems over the last five years
through consistent Pay Plan administration. Pay Plan
administration has now been complicated by the mandate to
implement comparable worth. For the sake of consistency in
dealing with employees, and given the yet unresolved complications
of comparable worth implementation, I would recommend alternative
#2.
Action Requested:
Authorize the appropriate City Officials to enter into a one year
employment agreement with Barry Stock as Administrative Intern at
the rate of pay of $6. 31 per hours.
JKA/jb
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
SECTION ONE
Terms of Employment
The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of one
year, commencing October 15, 1986, or until the position is made
a permanent position or the City begins implementation of its
Comparable Worth Plan. All procedure affecting wage rates and
job classification incorporated in any comparable worth plan
shall apply to this contract including retroactive pay for 1986.
SECTION TWO
Compensation of Employee
Employer shall pay Employee, and Employee shall accept from
Employer, in full payment for Employee' s services hereunder,
compensation at the rate of $6. 31 per hour for services rendered
for a normal 40 hour week, with overtime or compensatory time to
be paid for work in excess of a 40 hour week when authorized in
advance by the Employee ' s supervisor. Annual percentage
increases authorized for all other City employees will be applied
to the stated initial wage rate. Attendance at evening meetings
as outlined in the employee ' s job description shall be considered
a part of the employee ' s normal 40 hour work week. The employee
shall plan his schedule such that it conforms to a 40 hour work
week, unless, at his election and with prior approval, he chooses
to work more than 40 hours, in which case he may carry over
compensating time on the basis of one hour of compensatory time
for one hour worked.
SECTION THREE
Employee Benefits
Hospitalization Insurance and Long Term Disability.
Employer shall provide to Employee such group
hospitalization and long-term disability insurance as is pro-
vided to full-time employees of the Employer, and on the same
basis .
Life Insurance:
Employer shall provide to Employee such group term life
insurance as is provided to full-time employees of the Employer,
and on the same basis .
Vacation, Holidays and Sick Leave:
Employer shall provide to Employee such vacation, holiday
and sick leave as is provided to full-time employees of the
Employer, and on the same basis .
SECTION FOUR
Other Terms
If not otherwise established by this contract, all other
terms of employment shall be established by the Shakopee
Personnel Policy as adopted, March 5, 1980, and periodically
amended.
SECTION FIVE
Job Description
A complete job description outlining the employee ' s
duties is attached and made a part of this agreement.
SECTION SIX
Execution
In witness whereof, the parties have executed this
Agreement at Shakopee, Minnesota on the day of ,
1986 .
EMPLOYEE EMPLOYER
Mayor
City Clerk
City Administrator
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMO
TO: John Anderson - City Administrator
FROM: Jim Karkanen - Public Works Dept.
SUBJECT: Status change - Dorothy McPherson
DATE: Oct. 1, 1986
INTRODUCTION:
The Public Works department is requesting a status change in employment for
Dorothy McPherson from temporary part-time to permanent part-time as the Secretary-
Receptionist for the department. This change is requested because she works more
than 120 working days per year, and the Finance Department said it creates a problem
with PERA contributions. It will also clarify her employment position with the City
of Shakopee.
BACKGROUND:
Dorothy has been a temporary part-time employee for the past 4 years, and has done
a good job as a receptionist, taking phone calls, typing and maintaining our record
keeping system. Since we will be computerizing our record keeping system this winter,
we would like Dorothy to be involved with the changeover, from the onset, as we
implement the computer changeover.
Dorothy was provided to us originally by the CETA program in June of 1983 until
the program funding expired that fall. The following year, we requested another part-
time person for the season, and we were referred to Minnesota Job Services, who screened
all of the applicants for us from their eligibilty roster. We were never shown their
applicant list, so we remained impartial to their screening process. All of the persons
on the eligibility list were given the GATBY test after they were interviewed, and
screened by Pete Holmstrom, who was the JOB Services Director. The screenings, interviews,
and tests, were coordinated by Jean Sinnell, who supplied the applicants under the
auspices of the MEED and WIN programs. After the interviews were completed, both Jean
and Pete recommended Dorothy for this position. She was subsidized by these programs
until their funding expired, then paid a part-time salary by the City of Shakopee
under General Fund budgeting as a part-time worker.
Dorothy currently works a 4 hour daily shift at $ 5.00 per hour, and is satisfied
with this schedule, which gives her enough time to update her records, perform various
tasks which are scheduled for her. These tasks consists of working with the Tree and
Weed inspector, sending out the citations, notices, contracts, scheduling curbsides,
coordinating the contractors, as well answering the phone, updating our records, typing.
r and general office duties. She also runs parts for the Mechanic, which enables him to
stay in the garage area, instead of having to constantly leave his work station. She
has been with our department long enough, to be able to handle phone calls and inquiries
in regard to our departmental policies. She has, on many occasions, been lent out to
other departments to assist these offices, when needed.
Because of Federal cutbacks, the CETA programs have been virtually eliminated,
except for the Summer Youth Employee program, which generally operates from mid-June
until mid-August. This Summer Youth Employment program has not been able to supply us
with any workers for the past several years, probably because they only pay minimum wages
for a short duration. We have resorted to hiring secondary college students, lately,
during the summer months as part-time workers, and this is only during the summer
vacation schedule.
Page 2 continued -
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Advertise for another person for this position at Public Works as a
part-time Receptionist.
2. Not fill the position.
3. Hire Dorothy as a permanent part-time Receptionist, changing her status
from temporary part-time to permanent part-time: . Her normal workday
will be 4 hours per day. Because she had already been screened, tested,
and interviewed by Minnesota Job Services, I feel that we have already
met the Equal Opportunity guidelines for hiring practices.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #3, . . .with the expense coming from the current 1986 Street
Division Budget and the same Division for 1987 using the
increased budgeted for part-time. This is a .33¢ per hour
increase and will make Dorothy eligible for a pro rata share
of all employee benefits.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Authorize the Public Works department to change Dorothy McPherson from
temporary part-time status, to permanent part-time status as a Receptionist,
Step 9 on the Clerical Pay Plan for the Public Works department at $5.33
per hour.
MEMO TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Buy-Back of Police Holiday Time
DATE: September 23, 1986
Introduction
The City contract with police offficers provides that the City, at its option,
may buy-back from police officers any holiday time earned but not used in any
given year.
Request
This year we have received two requests. One from Sgt. Kenneth Hanel for a
buy-back of a total of 21.6 hours and one from Officer David Nelson for a buy-
back of 88.0 hours.
Our union contract provides no flexibility for the City in responding to the
buy-back request. Historically the City has had a minimum buy back requests.
Recommendation
I recommend that we comply with our contract and buy-back the hours requested.
Action Requested
Pass a motion authorizing the appropriate City offficials to buy-back 21.6
hours of earned but unused holiday time from Sgt. Kenneth Hanel and 88.0 hours
of earned but unused holiday time from Officer David Nelson.
JKA:mmr
City of Shakopee 1
POLICE DEPARTMENT
476 South Gorman Street
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379
- Tel. 445.6666
TO: CITY OF SHAKOPEE
FROM: OFFICER DAVID NELSON, SHAKOPEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
DATE: SEPTEMBER 23 , 1986
SUBJECT: HOLIDAY HOURS
I am requesting the City of Shakopee to buy back from me
the holiday time-off hours I have earned and not used for
the year 1986 . As of this date I have not used any
holiday hours.
I am requesting the City of Shakopee buy back the holiday
time off-hours in the amount of 88 hours.
Officer David Nelson
JO 1-7-
City of Shakopee l
} POLICE DEPARTMENT
476 South Gorman Street
- SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379
Tel. 445-6666
TO: CITY OF SHAKOPEE
FROM: SGT. KENNETH HANEL, SHAKOPEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
DATE: SEPTEMBER 23, 1986
SUBJECT: HOLIDAY HOURS
I am requesting the City of Shakopee to buy back from me
the holiday time-off hours I have earned and not used for
the year 1986 . As of this date I have used 66 . 4 hours.
I am requesting the City of Shakopee buy back the remaining
21. 6 hours.
Sgt. Kenneth Hanel
rr.. r-7.. n_
PUBLIC WORKS✓DL=);tiRTN..I.T
n KEMO
� TO: John Anderson - City Administrator I �-
FRONT: Jim Karkanen - Public Works Dept.
SUBJECT: Sidewalk maintenance on Marschall Rd.
DATE: Sept. 11, 1986
INTRODUCTION:
Because of our increased workload, the Public Works department is requesting
direction from the City Council to cease the temporary maintenance on the sidewalks
and boulevards on Marschall Road (County Rd.n17) , and East Shakopee Av. from
Pearson school to Marschall Rd.
This request is in response to the City "Goals and Objectives" from 1985
and 1986 work sessions which state:
SUBGOAL 3.19C OBJECTIVE - "Discontinue the temporary sidewalk maintenance on
County Road 17 and East Shakopee Av. (From Pearson school to CR 17) .
When this roadway was completed, Council instructed the City crews
to plow them, until more occupancy on the R/W was established for
sidewalk responsibility. This problem could be compounded with the
construction of more sidewalks on the East side. Set a date to
notify adjacent property owners that they will be responsible for
plowing, mowing, etc. "
"ACTION: Council should address the temporary sedewalk maintenance
along County Road 17 and E. Shakopee Avenue to decide if and when
City maintenance will b@ discontinued. Staff will provide a memo
on this issue by 6/1/86."
BACKGROUND:
We have searched the Council minutes in late 1975 and through 1976 and cannot
find Council action that directed the temporary maintenance on these frontages. The
City Engineer, at that time, had issued the directive to Public Works to do the
temporary plowing and mowing, and apparently was conveying tris directive as a result
of conversation, rather than as a formal motion from Council.
If my memory serves me correctly, this was about the time that the City began
maintenance on the sidewalks on 10th Ave, but this maintenance service was given to
these property owners as a result of promises made at the public hearings conducted
in rea_ard to constructing the sidewalks on the south side of 10th Ave. Therefore,
it is my assumption, that the sidewalks on 10th Ave. will remain a maintenance
obligation for plowing in the winter season. To my knowledge, the sidewalks on
Marschall Road were never discussed, nor included, in the public hearings for 10th Ave.
The City of Shakopee entered into an agreement with the County Highway department
r in June of 1976, regarding shared maintenance responsibilities on Co. Rd. 17. This
agreement basically states that the County highway crews will be responsible for the
center portion of the roadway, and the City is responsible for the outer 16 feet
from the curbline. By assuming the maintenance of the outer 16 feet, we are then
responsible for cleaning the catch basins, and removing snow from the boulevards
when it gets too high for good snow storage, and creates a visibility problem.
We generally wait for the County to plow the center sections of the roadway, and then
our crews will take it out to the curb, with sanding responsibilities shared by
both agencies.
Currently, the City crews plow the west side of Marschall Rd from 1st Ave. to
11th Ave. , and the east side of Marshcall Rd. from 10th to 11th, and E. Shakopee
Ave. from Pearson school to Marschall Rd. In the summertime, most of the property
owners maintain their respective boulevards, except the absentee property owners
south of the C & NW railroad tracks to the Tom Thumb Mini-mall, and from 10th Ave.
on the west side only.
Since Riva Ridge Arts. installed their new wooden fence on Shakopee Avenue this f
month, it will be physically impossible for us to aet our equipment on the sidewalk
in that area because of the narrow pathway between the utility poles, hydrants,
and the new fence.
ALTERNATIVE:
1. Completely discontinue all sidewalk and boulevard maintenance on Marschall
Road and East Shakopee Avenue this fall.
2. Discontinue all boulevard maintenance effective November lst, 1986, but
continue sidewalk plowing on Marschall Rd. this season until April 1st, 1987,
at which time, the City will discontinue all maintenance service in these
areas. The East Shakopee area will not be plowed this winter because of the
inability of our equipment to get through the sidewalk near Riva Ridge Apts.
A letter will be sent to the affected property owners announcing the cessation
of our maintenance involvements in these areas.
3. Continue maintenance on these boulevards and sidewalks as previously performed,
until further direction is received from the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
We recommend Alternative T 2, which will give the property owners enough
time to make other arrangements for maintenance, and allow enough time for
further development on the frontage, which will reduce the drifting problems
from the open fields. The Weed Inspector will monitor the boulevard mowing
next season.
ACTION REQUESTED:
That the Public Works department, because of their work load, will cease
sidewalk maintenance on East Shakopee Avenue from Pearson school to Marschall
Road, but continue sidewalk plowing this winter season until April 1st, 1987,
and send a notice to the affected property owners to notify them of this,
action.
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer.
SUBJECT: Holmes Street Lateral Project
Change Order No. 3
DATE: October 1 , 1986
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is unange Order No . 3 for the Holmes Street Basin
Lateral Project.
BACKGROUND:
At the intersection of 7th Avenue and Lewis Street, there just
happened to be 3 grade conflict points between the storm sewer to
be installed and an inplace watermain . Although some grade
conflicts were anticipated and a quantity included in the
contract , the 3 in this intersection were not anticipated .
Charge Order No. 3 provides for a change in the type of work
contracted for and the work desired. In effect, instead of 3
lowerings within the intersection utilizing numerous joints, the
watermain is lowered through the entire intersection.
The result of Change Order No. 3 provides for a better system at
roughly the same cost as if the watermain was lowered 3 times at
the contract price. The need to execute a change order is due to
the different work completed and the additional crossings not
anticipated at this intersection.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Change Order No. 3 .
REQUESTED ACTION:
Move uo approve Change Order No. 3 in the amount of $3 , 500 .00 to
the 1986-3 Holmes Street Basin Lateral Project.
KA/pm p
CHOR3
CHANGE ORDER
Change Order No.: Project Name: Holmes Street Basin
Date: September 9, 1986 Contract No.: Laterals
1986-1
Original Contract Amount # 941,25 .82
Change Order(s) No. —1thru No. 2 $ 1,600.00
Total Funds Encumbered Prior to Change Order $ 942,85 82
Description of Work to be Added:
The Addition of 110 L.F. of Watermain to be Lowered Including all Pipe, Fittings, and
Appurtenances.
The above described work shall be incorporated in the Contract, referenced above, under the
same conditions specified in the original Contract as amended unless otherwise specified
herein. Any work not so specified shall be performed in accordance with the Standard
Specifications adopted by the City of Shakopee, Minnesota.
The amount of the Contract shall be increased by 3,500.00
The number of calendar days for completion shall be increased by .
Original Contract Amount $ 941,253.82
Change Order(s) No. 1 thru 3 $ 5,100.00
Total Funds Encumbered 946,353.82
Completion Date: September 20, 1986
The undersigned Contractor hereby agrees to perform the work
specified in this Change Order in accordance with the
specifications, conditions and prices specified herein.
Contractor;. ���Y= x/e," REVIEWED:
.-�- �✓ Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
Title
Date: - �% U �, Manage
APPROVED AND RECOMMENDED: Date
City Engineer Date
APPROVED: City of Shakopee
By: --Mayor DateApproved as to form this
day of 19
City Administrator Date City Attorney
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Engineerfo—
SUBJECT: Railroad Crossing Improvements
DATE: October 1 , 1986
INTRODUCTION:
The Chicago Northwestern Railroad ( CNH) contacted the City
regarding the upgrading of various railroad crossings . At the
time , the CNR was receptive to installing rubberized crossing
material if supplied by the City and that the work could be
completed this fall . Based upon that indication , Council
authorized the advertisement of bids for the rubberized material .
Bids have been received.
BACKGROUND:
Four bids have been received as tabulated below :
Red Hawk Rubber Co. $70,686 .00
McHenry, Illinois
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. $72 ,012 .00
Akron, Ohio
Hi-Rail Corporation $74 , 052 .00
Chicago, Illinois
Structural Rubber Products $89 , 679 .70
Springfield, Illinois
The engineer' s estimate for the bids was $80 ,000 .00 .
Apparently , the time frame for completion of six crossings
( Spencer to Atwood ) was overly optimistic. The crossings at
Lewis and Holmes was in such a condition that the CNR needed to
complete repairs as soon as possible . As you may be aware , that
work is now completed. The work was done in such a manner that
rubberized material can be easily installed next summer as well
as conduit installed for burial of communication wiring.
Attached is a letter from the CNR indicating that they are
interested in a complete corridor improvement to include :
Surface crossing improvements
Crossing protection devices
Protection to parallel traffic
Railroad Crossings
October 1 , 1986
Page 2
This corridor project would be through a funded program. I have
been in contact with Mn/DOT on this very issue and perhaps a
project can be worked out with enough support from all agencies
contributing to the project ( City , CNR , Mn/DOT , and Federal
Highway Administration) .
Relative to the bids received , the City has the following
alternatives :
1 . Reject all bids and rebid when the particulars or a
future project is determined. If everything falls in
place , the CNR will probably do any future bidding.
2 . Accept the low bid and purchase the material assuming
there will be , as a minimum , a surface improvement
project next year.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1 . Regarding the bids received, I recommend rejecting all bids
at this time .
2 . I further recommend that the City ambitiously seek a
corridor improvement project. Although beyond the six block
proposed improvement area, the City may need to take a stand
on the opening and closing of crossings beyond the project
area as well as proposed removal or unused or under utilized
sidings.
REQUESTED ACTION:
1 . Move to reject all bids on the Railroad Crossing
Improvements Project No . 1986-10 .
2 . Move to direct staff to work with the Chicago Northwestern
Railroad and the Minnesota Department of Transportation in
pursuing a federally funded corridor improvement project for
the railroad corridor in Shakopee .
KA/pmp
CROSSINGS
CHICAGO AND 10 TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
ASSISTANT DIVISION MANAGER
ENGINEERING
September 18, 1986
Shakopee, MN. — City of Shakopee
Grade Crossing Rehabilitation Program
Ken Ashfeld, P.E.
City Engineer
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear Mr. Ashfeld:
The Chicago and North Western Transportation Company thanks you and the City
for your willingness to work with us to improve certain grade crossings in the
City. After a number of discussions with you, it was decided the crossings of
the C & NW's tracks by Louis and Holmes Streets would be rehabilitated.
The work would be undertaken in the following manner. Beginning at approx—
imately 7:30 a.m. on Tuesday, September 23, 1986, the crossings would both be
barricaded and closed to all vehicular traffic. The C & NW forces, at its
expense, would completely rebuild the track structures including, but not
limited to, the removal of the existing rail, ties, and ballast replacing the
same with all new ties, continuous welded rail (CWR) , line and surface the
track on fresh ballast, place a soil stabilization fabric, and install the
double flange rail type crossing. The track rehabilitation would be done in
such a manner that rubber crossing panels could be placed with minimal effort
next year if a crossing of this type was decided upon by the City.
The City, at its expense, would furnish and place the bituminous surface
material through the track zone and the approches to the crossing, and also
through the sidewalk area. If one is availble, the City would also furnish to
the C & NW a dump site so we may dispose of any debris from the crossing
projects.
The C & NW would also, in the near future, arrange for meeting with the City
and MnDOT to discuss the possibility of a corridor type project through the
central City of Shakopee to improve the automatic warning devices and grade
crossing surfaces of the six crossings.
275 EAST FOURTH STREET/ST.PAUL,MINNESOTA 55101 /612-221-9318
Ken Ashfeld - 2 - September 18, 1986
If the crossing surfaces would not be a part of the MnDOT funding program, the
C & NW would work with the City of see that the crossings in the central City
were rehabilitated with either rubber crossing panels or bituminous road
surface materials.
Please advise if this is satisfactory to the City. If so,, we will arrange to
schedule a meeting with MnDOT to determine what assistance can be obtained
from them.
Very truly yours,
FJZ
J. E. Terbell
Assistant Division Manager
Engineering
JFK
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer
SUBJECT: 10th Avenue Overlay Project
DATE: October 1 , 1986
INTRODUCTION:
The 1987 Capital Improvement Program includes the resurfacing or
10th Avenue from Marschall Road ( CSAH 17) to T.H . 300 .
BACKGROUND:
Engineering has completed the Project Development and
Location/Design Study Report as required by the Federal Highway
Administration ( FHWA) for Federal Aid Urban ( FAU ) projects .
Attached is the formal approval of that document by the FHWA.
The City has been authorized to advance the project to the next
phase which is development of plans and specifications.
The project consists of repairing isolated problem areas, minor
curb repair , upgrading handicap accessibility to sidewalks ,
pavement markings, and a thin bituminous overlay . Attached is a
copy of the report. The estimated project cost is $253 ,000 .00 to
be funded as follows :
$194 , 800 .00 Federal Aid Urban Funds
$ 58 ,200 .00 Municipal State Aid
There are two design elements that Engineering requests Council
to provide direction, those design elements being sidewalks and
storm sewer.
Sidewalks : There are no existing sidewalks on the
north side of 10th Avenue west of Dakota Street. There
is sidewalk along the full length of the south side
with pedestrian cross walks at selected intersections.
The question is the need for sidewalk on the north
side. I suggest the criteria for the need would be
based upon the volume of pedestrian traffic using the
north parking lane in disregard for the sidewalk on the
south . This use of the parking lane is an unsafe
condition in this traffic environment and could be
studied further if Council feels there is enough
pedestrian traffic on the north side to warrant the
study . There are approximately 24 blocks on the north
side that are void of sidewalks and the estimated cost
for sidewalks in this area , including restoration, is
approximately $6 ,200 .00 per block.
10th Ave. Overlay Proj .
October 1 , 1986
Page 2
Storm Sewer : Storm drainage on 10th Avenue is
controlled by a combination of storm sewers and cross
swales. The major area of drainage problems existing
on 10th Avenue is between Apgar Street and Atwood
Street. Atwood Street does not have a. drainage problem
in itself with the exception of a drainage swale across
the main stream of traffic. This drainage swale was
improved in 1982 and is still in good condition. With
the presence of the storm sewer constructed this year
on Apgar Street as far south as Shakopee Avenue ,
although in good condition, the cross swale at Atwood
can now be eliminated as well as other drainage
problems with a relatively short extension of the
existing storm sewer. The attached sketch indicates
the possible storm sewer extension with an estimated
cost of $63 ,000 .00.
Regarding FAU funding, sidewalk and storm sewer are qualifying
work items. Our FAU fund will be depleted by the estimated FAU
share of $194,800 .00 for improvements proposed to date. Since a
City' s FAU fund cannot be in excess of that City ' s four
consecutive years of allotment, Shakopee has lost some funding
due to inactivity of projects. Mn/DOT indicated that they could
try to find additional funding for storm sewer and sidewalk cost
but could not guarantee the replacement of those dollars lost.
There are no assessments proposed by this project since it is not
a street rehabilitation project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct staff to prepare plans and specifications for the 10th
Avenue overlay project.
REQUESTED ACTION:
Move to direct the City Engineer to prepare plans and
specifications for the 10th Avenue overlay from Marschall Road to
Trunk Highway 300 , Project No. 1987-1.
KA/pmp
10TH
s � -
�i a
0
August 27, 1986
Mr. P,ichard P. Braun
Commissioner
Department of Transportation
Room 411, Transportation Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Re: Project Development and Location/
Design Study Report
Minn. Pro j. 11 5060()
S.P. 166-105-10
Scott County
Dear Mr. Braun:
A copy of the combined Project Development and Location/Design Study Report
for the subject project was submitted with Mr. Gordon M. Fay's August 15, 1986
letter.
The proposed improvement involves rehabilitation, resurfacing and safety
upgrading of 10th Avenue from CSAR 17 to TE: 300 in Shakopee.
Based on information in the Report, we concur:
that the proposed project is unrelated to traffic noise;
in the determination that no Coast Guard Permit is required;
that no threatened or endangered species would be adversely affected;
in the State Historic Preservation Officer's determination of no—effect
(Memorandum of Understanding);
that the proposed project complies with Executive Order 11958, Flood Plain
Hanagement (no encroachments);
that this action complies with Executive Order 11990, Protection of Wet—
lands (no encroachments);
in the minimal level project path selection;
in the determination that the proposed project is a categorical exclusion.
Location and Design as discussed in the Report are approved.
Sincerely yours,
Roger Borg
Division Administrator
r
/s/ A! s. �r e,en t
By: Alan J. Friesen-
District
riesenDistrict Engineer
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
and
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REPORT
AND
LOCATION AND DESIGN STUDY REPORT
for
10th AVENUE M5060()
State Project 166-105-10
From: CSAH 17
To : T.H. 300
RECOMMENDED
i' _ _ �-
j..ity Engineer Date
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED
!'
Dist. Sa ,e Aid Engineer Date
-
APPRO i
State Aid Engineer ` Date
11;7P,ODUC710t;
This Project Development Report and Location and Design Study
Report has been prepared and submitted in accordance with the
State of Minneso` a Action Plan Guidelines. This reoorr
determine the � �-� „o
project development path necessary to resurface an
urban street within the City of Shakopee .
PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The proposed action would resurface 10th Avenue (FAU 5060) within
the City of Shakopee , Minnesota. The project termini consists of
CSAH 17 on the east and the TH 300 on the west. The length of
the proposed project route is 2 . 10 miles . Figure 1 indicates the
location of the proposed project route within Shakopee .
The inplace roadway is a four lane two-way with parking on each
side , urban facility with concrete curb and gutter and minimal
in-place storm sewer. The width of the facility from curb to
curb is 64 feet with a 100 foot right-of-way . Sidewalk with
handicap ramps meeting the City of Shakopee code is continuous
from CSAH 17 to T.H. 300 on the south side of 10th Avenue , and is
continuous from CSAH 17 to Dakota Street on the North side of
10th Avenue . The traffic volumes (ADT) ranges from 2 , 925 to
5 , 650 as counted in 1983. There are 4 multiway stop locations
Placed in accordance with MUTCO "Warrants" Section 2B-6 . The
roadway is speed zoned for 30 M. P.H. and the terrain is flat.
The existing pavement structure consists of 4 inches bituminous
Pavement over varying inches of aggregate base . The in-place
roadway was built in segments from 1960 to 1976 .
The proposed improvement consists of: Repairing isolated problem
areas ( extensively cracked or failed) and provide a minimum
bituminous overlay, some minor areas of curb & gutter replacement
( settled areas) , alley approach slab replacement (where severely
deteriorated) , installation of new handicap ramps where needed ,
Placement of crosswalk signs and pavement marking, repair of
damaged signs and designated pedestrian walkways. in conjunction
with the bituminous overlay, the inplace pavement adjacent to the
concrete curb and gutter will be milled to accommodate the
thickness of the overlay . Milling will also be necessary to
remove severely eroded pavement areas that do not reflect
underlying structural problems . Refer to r, r
tyr)' ccs U j n _ EU e r or Dropcsed
OBJECTTyES Or' 'run PROPOSAL
The present pavement structure is showing signs of distress in
the pavement section such as alligated cracking, rutting , and
severe pavement erosion. The proposed improvement would add an
additional 1 . 50 inches of bituminous surfacing Lo provide
1
increased pavement strength and improved serviceatility . This
would not only safeguard the City ' s investment but will extend
the service life of the facility a minimum of 15 years .
Total project costs are estimated to be al prc;:imately
v2,53 , CLC . 00 . Federal r.id Urban funds amounting to about i7
percent are anticipated to be used on the project , the balance
will be City matching fund and/or tiunicipal State Aid funds .
Construction is scheduled for the summer of 1987..
The typical road users are school buses and the general motoring
public of this area .
The proposed project would eliminate the substandard pavement
structure and improve rideability of the surface while also
protecting the City ' s investment.
PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT
No specific public meeting or hearing was held regarding this
project . This proposed improvement is part of the City of
Shakopee ' s ongoing pavement preservation program.
The City Council passed a resolution authorizing the Commissioner
of Transportation for the State of Minnesota to act on behalf of
the City of Shakopee for approval of improvements to 104.--h Avenue
as a Federal Aid Project. The Metropolitan Council , the Regional
Development Commission for this area, will review this Project
Development Report and thereby be notified of the project . Tt is
highly unlikely that a restoration project of this nature would
be inconsistent with their policies . The project is consistent
with local planning goals .
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
To date , no significant environmental impacts have been identi-
fied . The nature of the proposed projects should have no
significant impact on the environment. There will be no land
takings as defined by Section 4 ( f) of the Department of Trans-
portation Act of 1968 . There will be no permits required by
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 or the Corps of
Engineers.
k
RIGHT 0P WAY
The existing right of way is 100 feet. All work will be per-
formed in the existing right of way . if any additional work
would be needed this would be accomplished within the existing
right of way. No homes or building s will be taken by these
projects.
2
AIR QUALITY
quai� t1 impact of the proposed improvement has been
-he pre
C1 r � l � • i%cseq lm pr q�/ement fS n `^� ....
- C ,ii icant , _ of a., C -Pated to have
a= r gUG- :- ty iii,pacts ar,d is considered to be con—
sistent with the approved State Implementatior, p
consultation with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ,cion
required by FHPi1 7-7-g Air Qualit Guide �, Agency , as
the air cualit anal Y lanes and he detail of
Y ysis ; s considered to have been accomplished
and is documented in and by the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency Memorandum of Understanding.
NOISE ANALYSIS
This is a bituminous Project .
unrelated to traffic noise in accorTherdance, the proposed project is
dance to FHPM 7_7_3 ,
Construction noise has been considered and no i �-
pated, as no unique noise receptors have been identified ant
lthe
areas of the proposed project and the construction activity is
not expected to generate unusual or excessive noise .
WATER POLLUTION
Since this project is primarily resurfacing,
affect on flooding, erosion , or sedimentation ,l ` will not have an
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVA ION AC
This is a bituminous resurfacing pro
in the Department i;innesota Departure project and as such is included
of Transportation/State Historic
Preservation Officer Memorandum of
ablishes sati Unaerstanding which est-
saaction of the Procedures aor the Protection
ristoric and Culp r, A of
ural . roperties required by Federal Law.
COh'TRO�TEP,SIAL ISSUES
There are no known controversial issues connected ;
Proposed improvement, w- �r
h the
AESTHETIC VALUES
There will be no demonstrable change in aesthetic or other
related values including visual cualit
visually more at r L L Y• The roadway will a
t, ac . ive �o the user due to the appear
nature of the project • h restorative
OTHER E�"ECTS
The probable socil and economic effects of the
is not adverse . The Proposed 1mDr ove-
ment project -
improvement offers positive
3
effects to the public in regard to transportation quality , social
and economic opportunities , and enhancement of work , school ,
recreational , and similar opportunities. The 4mprovement will
immediately provide a better road for area residents. The only
probable negative effect to the social and econc-mic environment
iz that cf a zhort period of inconvenience during
construction operations which will C1Srupt tr of f 1C pattern5.
Such disruption shall be Iminimized and probable negative effects
will be small or nonexistent . No abutting landowner will suffer
economic hardship as a result of the project . ' No detours are
proposed as traffic will be maintained during construction.
FARMLAND PROTECTION POLICY ACT (FPPA)
No right-of-way is to be acquired for the project, therefore the
FPPA does not apply .
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11988 - FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT
This project is a roadway bituminous overlay of approximately
1 . 50 inches in thickness . Because this project will have no
affect on waterway opening, stream size, stream location, and no
stage increase in water elevation , there will be no chance of
increased flooding , no risk to life or property , no impact on
natural and beneficial floodplain values , no support of any
probable incompatible development in the floodplain, no potential
for interruption or termination of any transportation facility
and is considered not to be an encroachment in the floodplain.
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
The proposed project is not located within the habitat of any
endangered species, listed or proposed, as given in the U.S. Fish
and b;ildlife Service Red Book. Therefore, no endangered species
will be affected.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11090 - PROTECTION OF WETLANDS
There are no lakes or wetland areas situated where any con-
struction or related work will be performed as a result of the
proposed project .
DETERMINATION STATEMENT
Based on the Environmental Study and in accordance with 23 CFR
Par . 771 . 115 b . ( 13) , it is determined that the proposed action
is unlikely to precipitate foreseeable changes on the quality of
the human environment and is appropriately classified as a
categorical exclusion.
4
°ROJECT PATH SELECTION
In accordance with the State of Minnesota Action Plan guidelines,
it is proposed that the development of this action will follow a
minimal level path as shown below .
Project Development Report & Location
& Design Study Report March , 1986
Plans, Specification, and Estimate Novenber , 1986
Advertise for Bids February , 1987
PROJECT MANAGER
The manager for the development of this project is Ken Ashfeld,
Shakopee City Engineer . For further information regarding this
report , contact should be made with the City of Shakopee En-
gineering Department at :
Shakopee City Hall
129 E. First Avenue
Shakopee, MIS 55379
(612) 445-3650
LOCATION & DESIGN STUDY REPORT
No location alternatives were considered for this bituminous
overlay project. Design traffic volume is 8180 vehicles per
day . The adjacent terrain is flat.
Surface Width : 64 feet with concrete curb & gutter.
Design Speed : 30 MPH
Design Strength : 9 tons
No Horizontal Curves.
No Gradient Problems.
No Stopping Sight Distance Problems.
The design will be in accordance with the MnDOT/FHWA RRR Work
Program.
This project will enhance safety by : improving the riding
surface of the street and by improved identification of crosswalk
areas .
5
rn Oil
CID
F A U 50'6-772= - -
IMP _ - -
--n
_it.
t.-- 11,•--mit tr
• "J•,• •.-� � " fir.::. = ,•• ''. \ t
CD
y-
FAU 5058
� !1 w I r1�t•��• 1��� III r �
r -
FIGURE 1
641
r- AREA TO BE MILLED
6f
r-- 1.5 BITUMINOUS OVERLAY 6'
� EXIST. 4`1 BIT. PAVEMENT
�- EXIST. BASE MATERIAL (DEPTH VARIES)
� Qth AVE. TYPICAL SECTION
FIGURE 2
prn inc.
MIDWEST PAVEMENT M AINT--kGEAIENT, INC.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS
Suite 630.15500 Wavzata Bouevard Wavata. Minnesota 55391 (612) 475.9957
i
August i 1_3, _982 I
!
Mr. H. R. Spurrier, P.E.
City Engineer
C=TY
OF SHAKOPEE
129 East First Avenue i
Shakopee , Minnesota 55379-1376 i
i
Dear Mr. Spurrier:
We have done a prel_m.inary a_*zalysis of the testing on the streets !
which you spec_fied for resurfacing consideration. This letter
su=arizes our reCo^.' i!endation based on the tests wade on July 21,
1982. These are considered 1n two groups ;. 1 !Otn Avenue , and
(2) the side streets tested on the west end of Shakopee south of
6th Avenue and west of C .S .A.H . 15) .
( 1) Tenth Avenue was tested from ' Mi _i o_• Street to _':"_rison
Street . A total of 63 tests were run on the 12 ,700 feet
(2 . 37 -,; les) . The Road Rater deflections were converted
to Eenkelmmen Beam deflectiCnS and tOnr.aKeS C^�1Cuj.2ted based
on Mm/DOT standard procedures. The street tested Out to
an 8. 6 ton road based on these criteria. This indicates
that a mi^.imum overlay would be appropriate to level the'
surface . Other options would be to remove and replace
the existing surface or a Chip seal coat . Specific areas
should be considered before resurfacing. Criteria used
with the Road Rater, in addition to deflections , are the
deflection basin (spreadability) . Tne specific values
used are .
(1) Maximum deflection greater than 0 . 075 -n.
(2) Spread-ability less than 45% .
The maximum value of spring deflection is set to m4" mize fatigue
failure of the surface. A low spreadability means the pavement
section is relatively weak.
tt A
D—id 1, H"It+ 1,
inc.
Mr. :. R. Sour_.i e^, � . . . -2- AllSUSt 1082
A prediction of subgrade strength can also be made using the No. 4
sensor of the Road Rater. This value is shown as Es� (modulus of
the subgrade ) and as R4 (stabilometer R-value ) based on the No. 4
sensor. Es is shown in 1000 ' s psi and the column headed R4 is a
Prediction of R-value directly.
A rough prediction of CBR can be rade by dividing Es by 1500.
i
Areas where high deflection or low spreadability occur are as
follows :
Tenth Avenue :
H, > h deflections :
(1) 4217 ft. from Miller near Market Street
'mere is some alligator cracking at this location
indicating the need for repair with a catch.
(2) 12 .203 ft. from Miller near Van Buren Street
There is some longitudinal cracking which should be
repaired or filled before overlay.
Low SOreadability
i
"_.here are no sections of 10th Avenue tested which showed
this condition. .
On 10411-h Avenue, Es varies from 5000 at the Van Buren- Street
Iocation . to a high value of 20 ,000 near Clay Street . These
represent CBR' s of about 3 to 13. Most of the values of Es
are between 10 , 000 and 15,000 ( CBR of 6 to 10 ) . These
represent R-values from 7 to 34. Most R-values are between
12 and 25.
A minimum overlay to renew and level the surface is therefore
recommended. A Mn/DCT 2341 or 2361 specification mix should be
used. Asphalt content and other mix characteristics will depend
on the aggregate used. Other alternatives would be to remove
a-rid replace the existing sting surface using the Mn/DOT recycling
specification
2332 -or a chime seal coat .-
H R . S_ur. _er August i j , 1982
The sections south of Sixth Avenue and west of C .S .A.H. 15 include
the following segments :
Calculated
Tonnaze
7th Ave; Madison — C.S .A.H. 15 7 . 3
12th Ave ; Tyler — Polk 11 . 1
12th Ave ; Monroe — C.S .A .H. '15 8. 5
Quincy St; 12th — 11th 10 .0
Jefferson St; 6th — 10th 9 .4
Jefferson St; 10th — 12th 10 .0
Madison St; 6th — 12th 9 .3
Monroe St; 10th — 6th 7.4
Monroe St; 12th — 11th 10.6
Jackson St; 6th — 10th 10 .7
Jackson St; 10th — Circle 6 . 9
Van Buren St; 11th — 6th 7 .5
Harrison St; 1011.1 — 12th 9. 1
Tyler St; 12th — 11th 7 .4
The present tonnage calculated based on the Mn/DOT strength testing
criteria are listed following each section. Based on these tonnage
values , there is no need to increase the strength of these sureets
to bring them to a 7—ton capacity. if there is a need to overlay
because of surface wear, weathering, or cracking, a xini:..um t
ness op overlay =ix or seal coat would be adequate.
There are some areas noted with relatively high deflections and/or
low s_rreadability which should be looked at before resurfacing.
These are :
1 . 71.-h Ave ; Madison — Circle . 400 to 500 feet from f-Iadison the
de=iecz,ioas are high. This area is alligatored and should
be repaired be—fore resurfacing. The spreadability is also
low near Madison Ave . where there is some a'_ligatoring.
2 . 12th Ave; Monroe to C . S. A.H. 15 . About 460 feet from Monroe
;,here is an area of slig:�:-yy high deflection.
A A R N h InC.
Mr. H. R •
' August 13 , 1082
3 • Madison: Eth0
�0 1 2th. About 9"7feet from 6th there is an
area of slig.*I-)y nigh deflection.
4. Monroe: 10th to 6th. About 600 feet f
i rom. l0th there is an
area o� hi n deli �- �+ `
g e,, , on. (This is a patched area) .
5 • Jackson: 10th-Circle. inhere are areas of high deflection at
adou� loo DOC)
The spreadability atlene '22pOjrand 2105 feet from Jackson.
moot location is low indicating
6
in this area.
the surface is weak
6 . Van Buren; 111h-6th.
1 560 feet from 11th there is an area f
s==gh�_y nigh aeflec „ion. r- , o�
There is no distress here , n0
repair needs to be done . � •
7• 1napr; 12th td. -here is
11h. At 300-400 Feet a Wean area
The weak areas noted are localized
With a patch or leveling of a depression. The
could be corrected
for these pave=encs �h„ level of strength
"'ria cot►_d 'benOwS tha a mini mal resurfacing would be ade-
replace t-' in the form of a thin overlay
Lne surface or use a chi-D seas 9 remove and
Should be done to Mn/DOT speci_i� coa;. Any o_ these cztions
r ..a l OnS .
A lull report On the testing done b
=nc.
for the City y MidwestPavementManagement,o` Shak: ee will be available in -he next few
Weeks. if you have a.*: �•
1
tions , please call. s "1ens on nese preliminary recommenda-
Sincerely,
?SIDW.^.S i PAVEMENT MANAG 2 2ii T, TNC.
Lugene L. Skok, Jr. , PhD .
President
SLS/Smh
I
Cl 7,H
r:C':_—raAY !—?I.HUT=50
READING-3 "HILS..)
L0CAP T 1 i Ir.� HEEL y LIE r�EEi
T i EL
40_ 1 i_; 8 0
1CIC1-: 4.;1_t :i.:}t_1 1',:1.= , �:i,:it11 'IF-LEY ST
clI
-,c -
El cl
F_i
_ ry�l ori►::moi_ •_ ! .
-- Z. E 2.? 1.��_ 1.1_1:�
CT
r�i_t=� _.^1 ::} y,: Gi 1 =1 moi_+,• ►:i
DAKOTA ST.
78
MTHfJ=`ClTA ST.
ST.
i
T
1 1 I �'� _•t-1'i - -: �'� r_. �_1 =L I I�
u_ . r:.
;half? =:T
_T.
07 8
G:i_11._1F:
LT. zkA
171
✓_r y -
^ C^ _ N I i
3 !�I
. ,i 1 ^ 1
i'_ 1 ^
j'ra_1� q c. '• i 1 1. 1 ,' 1 1.`t_1 1.! _._�I_. i_ :.
.-
AP
29
30
_ _ i •�,� 1 _ —ri7 �T
3 Cl
4.8 f7l
1 - - ``' :• _ 1. 1 ?• 1 t :i.1 HIpF.f•_: _;T
_
1423
:1E:t_t7 ? cls c• _• �1 1E.::i_t +' lf�j•;I i� _!.
_ _.4t' �. _
1`41t_11 c= -4 ST.
- I-t;;CIt
-203
- '•x':,11• _�f•J 1:.__}'1�1••� r,"- �• _
E.
DI
r^;!ori: tiiLL --TRE—;:7T TO:
FR-1 f11; i-:; L IlyLl I Tr'il-_; :Tj1t.iC i
I t_i
----------------------------------------
1-7
_L7(
LONG. CR
---�-
i}J, C.
--_� r'R
10TH @UE. .SHAE.'E} CONTINUED RAGE 2
SPRING AXLE LOA, LlHITS (TOGS ) .
9 £
2205 —
9922 DAKOTA ST. '
3403 }
2422 DAKOTA ST.
3685
5652 MINNESOTA S2. .
388E
_ . _ . + END LONG. CR.
3266 MINNESOTA 2. .
\ 4003
4165 HARKET
�2±2 uHG�! ; . .
. • ALLIS. CR.
4406 , -g -
AL_!2. OR.
4544 MAIN 3
4601 _ T.MAIN S. . .
4.0 ƒ � � Ci
� - .
ALLIS.
\\\\ { _RLE;O�_ : .
. fig ƒ
52" + LONG. CR.
5357 SOMhEE9ILE£ Q�
' 5417 _�� .
5624
57-4-6
_
�R:S ST.5825
.
5006
032 — -
. c HU�I=a a7.
6214
14KT1 � I L• i. =;::,1�:;:j i�r: .I I_I if'�11f���_[I F.JZE _
T f1i-, I"D L T r4 T T._ '.TF
-----------------------------------------
7
------------------'F'------------------
rimy ..
r UL E«. _f
1121
--_ !—iT�s_I_J .T.
f
° _ -=I _''
i C9
_-!-1 7
+
11 '
10TH AUE. ( 3H REE) ED
'FF"
AXLE LOAD iTH172
5588 .
!0420 - -
¥
1ciii
:0255 -
-_ F-RS'N ST.
10227
1Ici
1128§
e MO�rOE SI. .
I!8§2
II53%
<Si ST.
INC '
. r. -
S. . .
N N N '
\ Y Y Y Y Y Y _ Y Y Y
U U V U U V U V U
WUA 4c
I 1 t I 1 I 1 1
C9 * i * i * ;* a► M i * � * *
CL. w
CD
r
wzi o N N N N N i cu N N I.. oo M M w I
P I O 4 PPP P :::
O 1 a cu 0 7 'P P P - ? :� N N N o N N M
z P o M M' m
I I I I I I 1 � 1` 'I lM I 1 1 1
f o N N IA N La o M o 0 0 0 o M I
I ,M P
N o N N N N N I1 { N N �M 00 N W N
O P I P P -PPP P -P 1 P I P P M v?"
V I 1 1 1 I I'. 1 1 I^ �.-
a o 1 M I o opo 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 o f
I j
z W
o w
., i LL to
a
0) to IL 1
I Z F1-
Q ¢ W
L) U' ►Z•' EEE _ N _ N Q
N N ¢ Q N W W W J: E
W W i E WWW'. rWi .:J M ►+ J H Q.
p ►. 1 0 U U U. Q.
J Z d ¢ ¢ ¢ J W J J WCL 4
E 6.. I rN ►+ LL LL LL: d ;y IL d
IL IL
►+ N d W NNN:
w i
N
H V :.
W Y JJ J N J cot F-t•-i
K U z
Y r. i m -S2S. ¢ .O ; ' ) �W N'. ccooN: m...
U i C C. d. do .N 1 3 .b -a H
2 } I NNN- �-' I U I
j F U + 4¢Q ! z .W U i l� !-: w w� ¢ I
O O
U D_• N Z ►Zi O O km N Z I � I... ►r.... 1"
O Q 'W W W. Ix + IU . 3 LL q,� Z
1I in
{ I- w
F-~•
W - G i U w H M M. Z i N ;4 N- Q Q' N �.
9 .. rr d U U U 4 W W E 3 3 J
CK Ix 000 z I.-
E i E - E N N N ! '.o Q. N I,.. m. U
i
a o+
M M, 'o� mj N N N'N o o� `N N M M M M N N o o o o'o o
N cul b%o CD CO; N CO CO N 'o o� T I N N N th IT IT a�N7 N
N N o�'a� 'o•o T 7
O V'Ln I ?
MM: NNNN 1 �o.o PP NN MM NN M0(U
i� N I11 M CU -D N
j
j ; I I I 1 ! � I •
W .o COm o o .o m.o 10 .o m i N m m ao m
a
co ao co co \ \ co \\ \
o
0 00 0
'i 'O O o O O o � !�
N H o O O 0 0 0
LL
O
} O
F Z
U Y M P N * P P P1 * T * * ''No * M1 * o o * ►-
ip W O i o O iF o 0 o b 0 �I• o iF o * o * :o * o M
fo S P P P * P 7 P i1 P •!i P iM P 7 iY P * P * M1 M1 •k M1
T V F M1 M1 * M1 M1 M1 * M1 * M1 * M1 * M1 '' X N * N N • N
N - N N * N N fU +► N * N * N * N * N
N 111 N N M N N N N M
Y Y Y Y Y Y x Y Y
U - U U U U U U U U
w 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 N f } 1f• !! * • f f f
Q N !
a w I
E
• i
OD
1 a ,a <n N m I I M
o �o o.a. .o ti M ;
_ P m CO P M - � - t
> a j ^.
N N F M N cu
M M M i M P P M M Q
_ N^ ^ I 1 - � 1 I' I 1 I 1'
0 M --N N F M I N .- v I p• N ^ N
z I ,a M M M M ;P P ^
1 i I I 1 I 1 1. I I ;, 1 M, P
F N N N o 0 0 I N .- o ocu
z M M M N M M c. F M ,N M
G vv T * m ,N M M M N N N
U I 11 I 1 I iP P 'P P P {
Q ! 0 00 0 0 0 'o a ! N c o o f
1 i t I
I
i
z {
bl Iy M
a. 1 (q
a-
i z z
U w ►+r�
N Q 6Q N CL W �< 1?A W .y 3 Q M
W I E EE W W i= ►+ w E W
E 3113 1L CL iL J H Wd ~ W 'K - D.: J
I .. 1
M M H > 0 M IL
w >> 1L H Q w M Q }- "� a
a vo n Ix K v n ,e o 0
H w w w M tL F W n 3 ►- E w al
w
to
W 'a j
N I n M
V w M N Z CL 'W ! M
w O tr¢ N W ..�- >- U• U
2 d 00 N m ck: x 1- W Z 3 t
U N !-t- Q - { W a w J
O ' z 00 11- 0 ? 3 D -Y
n 3 » N z , O :E m m rr
Z Q Q Q .z. w 2 1 d.
w i J < n
z Y N tt: Z t
> ! z EE W z O 'n Q' W Z �= J; N
j Q E E ¢ Q >- E I z 'U
x oo .. w ':Q v Q ! w ., Q
U U U W w J i 2 J I
I
1
0 1 ?? 000 00 0o MM MM 1111(1 1nM oo
Ln II o0 oPP ao+ .o ,o m m I
N N NF mm m m NNN 7 P Y U1 N F o�oh N N w w �O �o �o�o o� os p o jM MF N Jj MM FM0 MM FF m aD I11111 MM yob in in � rtpq � �O
z I I NN ^� ^ ._. i F
0 I m m I
W
w o o c .o o W w o n o u o 0
D_ ro m m m CD CD to m m m m m CO
x
2 W
N I.-
<G ^ .•. ^ O O O O O O p O
LL Q
O
Y 0
z
U Y i, M Q P ii N 10 f In f a, * P f ,D f M P f N }� in
L) * ^ ^^ * F F * o f o • F F * m } o
,O W :} ^ .� } * N f :N } N } N * N N * N 1F M
? f V # v V f R P �► P f 7
� U -f F F F } F F !� F !► F f F i F f F F } F * N
f N N N * N N f N f N f N f N _ f N N * N f N
M NN N -1f1 N N N N N N
U V U V U U U U U U
w 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I
t9 .1► s N i M A iF M i f /! M
wa ;• * * * r k x w
u NIL w
ii !- !! • N 9F • iF R !!
a N
ID s I
a0
o ° w m ;
I a ) i I 1 a .po '
OD
i LA M
> o N M o ^ ^ N
Z
7 N iU
_ R �
_ o w N N
O 1 ^ ? . N o N M j o !oN .- T.
Z ', M erPP N o i o '?UI V <
I 11 1. 1 ^ I 1 1 ! I I I I I 1 I
I 0 0 0 .o o o N ;o o N P o
z .p M 0' M M ! b ;M M pMj R' N
D r,
¢ o 0 0 0 o I o a0
i
z I I r r I N ! I w -
I w
o I °; M i ! a I
r i N j
IL M v 1 Ir f- i
IL N U I W r
1 N m z
V ! W W W W O Z' ! » 1 LCU
N I Z Z Z Z .b N ¢ K ¢ iwIx w a w
w V w iWW E
O ¢ a ¢ a J F N N C7 INN
E » » > i N r a s
w NNNN a ! W I � � a !z� a N ° I
r
z z z z ac
It as a ;aa w E. N F
! !
Ir i
w
r
M i
j
K `N fn - N
N r
Jw'" N 1
w a
v
U U E 1> o m
; a r c o Y
o rrrr ¢ w m Es a x
oww r xz z
W 'n 1
w M M M h•1-
'V V -.0 N..
UUUU. i i O O i W i![n wIL CL
EEEE'. a d ! m < ¢ I p 'mm .W W. 4 i
1 J J J J, E E E 3 E E z 00 O 6.
o 0000 00 oo
CD OD
o 00 00 ;o�om 'o0 400 I N
of 0000=0 oo NN 10-0 I �' QOO 00 II111"1 co ;oo 00 P
1 _ I m.o C w
0 o1D7oN PP ^ oo j a, ao �o 00 mLno IAlll
�o IANRM IA :MM 7v PPP oo 'MUIP
r' F NUI M..^ i i MF NUI �7 CDN 1
1 ' ODP
O
¢ I
w m o .o Ln.0 .o .o 0
Wa. CO CD 00 OD OD 00 OD w a0 co N N CO a0 co N\
o
Y ^ •- ^ ^ O O O O O O p O O
O O O O O O
2 W \ \ \ \ \ c o oo p oo o
U- D
0
r z
U Y P P P .1 P N OD O 3! OD * N N N * N
.D w -x M MM MMM x MM
7 * R
OD x ? 7 7 7 i! V +'r 7 IF V it b' d'
• (U IY N N * N x N M N ! N N iF N A N N N N +► N M N
P N N N N N N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
U U U U U U U
W U V
1 I 1 1 I UI 1 1 1
U �r w w w +► I.
W 4 w 1h w w r • � - * - * A
IL w
40
CD
ti o
o j i
o °
aR ! i I ao In
o j o
►Zi ! W R rM M M
rqIcu — PP Ir
1 _fll 1 I 1 1 1 j• Ij
-D M 1 _ _
Z 1.11 N i� I'MlN M j M NPPP q 1 N
P N ^ I
H c I I 1 1 I i 11 I I 1 1 1 1 IT j^
2 I M ; N o 0o mlo M o 0000 o I o
G ? iN NN M1t1 j N J mmInm
' P PP I N 1'1 i MM11M N N
U � I j I I 11 Pqi j P P � PPP7 q � q
� I
I
1 W {
? 1 U) U)
a 1 Lb0mm0
{ N ~ 1 z &M 1- f o » o
z Jd
WN -b -by y N I
Q Z :Q W W LL -0 ;S j w ►w•. !
W d + JJ JF i 1i i 'd JJM ►y
W Q w ,CD 0.d ;QZ i w F- LL > > LL C d
7 !G cr O.IL U' w '� Z
W m N Jd '.O ? w I O ¢ KO O 1 >
F II ;W C L) I--
U) N N
K 1 JII
w w 00 LU
z o I �� w I ILLI ° Q i
1 co w
00
Y no z
o
ww
w x
2 z r>- z z y y ►.
U Ir W !- Y Y Y Y OJ z
J
U z z
Q w oo rr >- r 0000
W z o J W UU UU 0 0 I-
_ U ; U NyIAN 2
O
> Ex Z FF FF- i- 1 F r rrr 10 i pLL
1
LL 'M 00it 00 O I O Ii
ix w w Q rr
j tY N N N tq N N y j W m y m Uzy z
i
w
1I 11
In 1
OD CO 1 0o Ioo Norco oo0 00 00 ooyo {�1� 'oo
a- I a00D I NN o0 1/11no uloln �a -o 1 00 00000 00 in Ln
0' 111111 0-0. NN Ln0 U) Omrt .PP o o ;PP P P
V,lw inLn -o F 0.,. I NN j NTy ^P 'PP NN
Z 1nUt !NN ' P P i I
D
w
W -D 10 -O -0 0 -O �
a
co co
p \ \ tp N N co N ao y CO CO O 00 00 a0
o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
x W
LLo Q o
i
r O
H z
j
U Y o N w N V' Q N to • F * m a M h M M x N * W
w w iF * F A O- • O-T D- 0% iY Q` * T a 1'1 M M rl ii P iF F •
O 2 it P M w P w P P P P i P +t P +t N In Ln to * Ill x to iF
� i q' • V' Q P P iF P 1F 7 N P P P P i1 P M ? •
� U x F s F w F u F F F F * F x F i► F F F F x F x F .y.
N N w N * N N N N N N N al N N N N w N • N K
In
LnY Y
U U
W 1
1
Lb x
W Q x # -
o co +► #
a to
a w
E
i
.o x
CD
1 d N F N N O,
o N c c.
s 0 IT , 0 v W IT
N ^ .o M .0
> ^ o N N
z IA N N N N P i M F .CD CO ❑ t0 �- N M N
w ^ 91• 10 M M P M M ^ ^M P' F P O M
N P N CO.
O 111' N MN N v M t CD OD O 10 ^ N M N N a M
z `0' �0 M ! M V' M M - ^ M v' F N
7 1 I 1to l0 c o I c 000000 P o I c N c
z M M N M T + 1T ^ ^ M
O M N N N M N N M M IU N IU tU tV N N M 111 OO N M
O
U 1 1 t 1 1 1 I I 1
rn cu
Q o- o 0 o f o o o o o '000000 F (U o 0 0 0
z
o rn 1 U)
H N ~
H to N J J Z CL
IL Ioto o o
O i O z
KU) Z J N S S
E C7 .z+ >
U W w J3 U U > W
y W co I ¢ O M N , U) to U) "U) U) N U)N U) N w Q IY
w W E LL j W W w W w W W W >- W IE N
km 0:J to N_ Q
W. J d ! W J J -j -J, F
E. >. CL r. O > IL ; a LL LL 0. CL d tL CL IL, J LL CL
�••� U' CL..� '.
w Q: a r ' a a a z z aaaaaa o a vy o
~. con w s i aW. oi ttoi L) U us to u, to �, o a U E. w a:
Lo
w ) > I Z r.
X J ¢ U) J` o
i U i W U z K ¢ U)'
z O U W
W O } z S z z
ILL
d.
U J .ai Y U )• •+ CLN N N N N N w 'b H 2 U) E_
O X O U m N z+ F- F- h- FhF > w. w. W LL'.
E K cc m IY Ir m O w
Z 7. w H rr .❑ co d W W W www W O O E O
w W O O K E E E E E E E. U z w w L) w'
> ED j m w 0: ❑ ~ 1 £ w w W w w W. O r. in W H
£ In W In U) N to O U LL. 7. w Q,
W im 0 Z H w O O ¢ '0 0 0 0 0 0 w LL O' ►- h '
w: O m Y I E ") o o 1 2 D:CC Ix IL"CY w J O O 2 U7 Uf
1 ;
OD O'� O O O O' O o O O IA {A O O O O 'F P M F M'O o O O FF In IA M M 10 10 O'
N.,.N a m� 0 0 0 0. F F 00 0 0- 00 ��•M M 'o M—CN. 0 o CUN77 .o m N.N IA
,a:,a .i I'1 M o o� o o CCI OD N N U1 to N th •. N N m N ^.0 0 o FF 1010 tn�o- o o N
NN - MM': co Co NN Nin Ln V. N N N.. P P FF' P P. ^ NNODN^F MM FF MM i NN
z j i i ! N'W i
O
L I r i
W
�O
LLA � d 10 W 10 �0 .D 10 �0 iJ J0 J0 a0 a0 10 D .0
a OD OD co OD co OD OD m o OD o p m w m OD m m OD OD m
p
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
mo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
U. ❑
O
Y O
E- z
U Y o x o N M v CA F # m tr m to c1 m o ^ N M �' In
v o x o 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0
ID w 0 x 00 CO OD co co co O co # OD CO CO O OD OD O O O O O m
co S P x 7 7 ? - P ? P 7 P # P v P P P P P P P P 4 P
91 U F x F F F F F F F F # F F F F F F I-
-
F F F r-
91
F
N • N N N N N N N N # N N N N N N N N N N N N
Y
W U
09 I
w a '�
¢ m
a w
E
m ? !
o
a b00(Ati i
o
x P V tt N
>
z Co N N M M o in N N - ' -
H r. p ^
Met ~ 1 M b M
Mr^ _ I o ^ ^ I^ - f I
O co N N M M O IA N M ^ i
z —MV F N o ^ 1
1 1 1 1 1 I M {`I
2 000 0 0 o M IM o I
Q ^
0 MMM M M M '1!1 jj ^ '
O PV'P P .P N +N N
1 Ix '
¢
0 J '
{
o I r ❑ ,
r I+J w s
a dF-
❑ J w ¢ IA
y �M F- z z a �> z
.�. a > o � z
N w w w y M d Cc
W WWW W 'W O -1 E .E W
O W J H W E J i
NCAN y :N CL ¢ Q - d F- J 3 ; i
H1
E LL tL LL LL w ~ IL IL J Ix fA O E O 0
w 000 O ,0 ❑ SIL i0 .d w Y ¢ LAw w - I
z ¢ ¢ ¢ I m O r U
F- �Cae +z 1- Q a �a 0 I W tc lrx .o T ►- ¢O j
�+ aaa a w N ofxu m yaw
W 3 I
O
w ,
w 0 r. I
W ¢Q Q V000 CL U
Y co 0 w y�j ¢ to w I I I j !
V w �' z t, O JJJJJJJ JJ
W J HI.- I- H- F- HF- I- I-
U .z...-�.z. 3 ¢ J E _ CO z 000000000 1
O SSE W 3 O N W 1U) f- H HHHHFf-F- j i
V ,0 0_ ^ P p1N M -- M .- P
000
❑ W �W W!- � �J E O .-(U M01- mOD
z z w � rn w ¢ o ;
�
www U :CL :Z I1 :> x O ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ J -
.0 .� 0 1- zzzzzzzzz ¢
I•-hl- ❑ Y F ¢ Y W 0770003 00 F i
¢"t¢ z ¢ O W ¢ 4 I WLLLLWww W LLLL O -
I'-F-F- Q 2 C.I ►-
F 1
ycA� Lo
ocoCD, 00 'oo NN o0 00 PP oo NO ^L goo NOON M
lAOoO 00 'oo PP ;00 00 ;CD CO pip. 1 toCnmN moan 10 IV N {
NtALnLA 00 'oo PP 00 NN i bb ' COPOt� .-o (A OP P i
.-
b.MN 0 C,:NN UI til mb Nr NN .- NIA I mtoN^Ob PF M
z I "' j OD - IA m ^b to I
0 b m to O+
1 i
1 i
w ;
W 10,010 +D b 10 b 10 10 10
a w ao OD co ro m m co ro co
¢ o00 0 0 0 0 0 o c
2 W \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
[AtL
O i
>- 0 1
H z 1
1
V Y w w w .a N mm o
^ N a
W W O[0 t0 m m m m 00 CND COO
00 2 7 7 Q P P P V' P P
m V N i-N N N N N N fl-
cu 0i cu N N N N N N N a -
p-t
+' C� N-I O O CC) 0 .-- N N O O r-I O O N O\
u\ r I M O\ ri O O O
rI O Lr\ u\ �O N O H N CO O CO O> OUll\ tlO
N u\ u\ -.tr-♦ M Hc+'1 r I N rl
�p N N
t1\ Co M [ -A N
k �
U
U
m
.Cd E 0
x w m m r. 4-4
r, x U) 4-4 A ° to vi i
CH o r-I a3 a s o bio d O
b z 4-3 , > °� ' w w z S -3 w z n
O O En u1 O S-.: p E W N W
H P4
L- CO O\ O1 O\O\O\ Q> O\O\ O H r-I N N NNN N M l— \O L- Co O\ O r 1 N
r M� M M M M Cr)M M Mm M M M M M M M �M co �M
U N N CUNNNNN NN N NN NNCUNCU CV CU N N N: CV CV N N N N
c N m E C: E
O
O
F' u w Q) v
was cn U da U E-+ F+ .r., 4-1 r a
Qco N � N H H H � N cd W cd N
w M 0 a a ° � .,� w w cn Q U a a Q
w (z Z cd " � E U 4 i H r-I E E �
anCd r-i P4 co o r4 0 a a a a a a a
ai O .r+ o 4-) +' - _
x N CO v) = = a = = w � U � = a = -
w
CC
C)
z Cd o-
o 0
U�
U
Q N N O co O CO U\--4- L\O O M u\ Co CO cc)\,o -1 O\ N [ r I O O r I O O
O\ r-I O M O lf\ M Co 0o O O -:I- M O N M O\ r-1 COO NON O 0
O I I �N �z NN S of 00 t- O --:1- O\ O Co �f\
O \10 N L`
r 1 �O M TN r-1 r I N \O
E U\ CO M C- r-1 N
I
4�
M U O 0 00000000 O 00 000000 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0
O 0 00000000 O O O r-I
0 0 0 r-4
0 O O O O O O O O O O
rl r I r-I r 1 r I r•I r-1 r-♦ r-I r-I r-I r-I r i ri r-I r-1 r i r I r I r I r I r 1 r-I r I r I i ri r-I
H I rI r r rrr-IU l(\ CO
CL4 CO O 000000 0 O 00 0co co co co co co co co
r I r i r 1 r-1 r I r-I r-1 r 1
SA
N
a r-4
C\JCQ M\OO OO O O O O O O
O r I M lf\00 l!\ r I 'i r O O O O O O O
O
E O _:I- M r-1 r-I M r-i r-I r-I M M-�
� N N O00M � O O
+D O � Lr\C -i -4- r-I r-I U\ co N i N -1 O O
N U O �\ M r-I r-i f r-1 M r� r-1 r � M r-i\10 CM� M\O O O O 0 O O O O O O
Q O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0\� 0 0 0 0 0 ti N ti ti cc)j N ON N M N N N M N
�i �� ��.�
r
Lf\ ri r I r-1 r-I r I r-4 r i -i r-4i r I r-I r-I -I r i r I r I r I rl r I c) 00co co co 00
o 0 0
E o �
E co
Q co N
N co
U)
O
O r-1
fZ O
U
fZ E
E
R'3 O
U
O N N
'd hD � oZ3
� � a
O cti CO H
> 3 Z
O
Z M y YIN
r I r-1 r I r-{ r I -1 1-1 r-1 -i r-1
U N N N CU N N C U C V C U N C U C V
�I
co
G\
r1 �
r-I
O
O
Q Q .rU 0 O —1-7 0C7*N N r 1
.x +) CO -� ti O -:I- C\
_:I-
54 EI O Z ai coOONI�
Ca U �-1 O +) •rl O
O O I'D N
C4 U E1 = _ _ _ _ _ = N N O�
a¢ -e9-
N
E1 U
Cd
O p
UI
U
Q
O O _:t NCO N Mp�\N r-1
O O O �Occ <`-� �CcC11coM
+� . . . . . . .
C O O� O\ r-I [ r1 N r-I
E 0 r-I N
to
< N
tf3 cin E1
(s+ E-i C-
Q)N
r•4 E
v o 0 0 000000000
U r-i r-1 r-1 r-� r-1 r-I r-1 r-I rH �-1 r-i r-I 0CU7 E-q U 4 ct �
0 0 0 000000000
r 1 rH I r I r r-I r-q r-1 r 1 rH r-1 r i 1 1 1 1 1 1
hD Fti M r4 r4 r-1 —1\D r-1_:i rH* f-1 rH* r-i
U N r O O 00r-qOr-10000 fs Or-i riNco CC)
F,
N 0 M N O N N r-1 N N r
O M 0 r-i N r-1-:t -4- -� M M
N O r I l-- O r-i r-1
Q. O M O r-1 N r-i r- � --t M M
N U
U] U O O O O r-4 r-I r-1 r-1 r-I ,1 —1
Q r-i 01\ ti O\ N N CV N N C\1 N N
M M M cc M M M M M M M M
C M r1 r1 -4 \D rI r1 r1 rI
� 0 0 > >a >> >�S
Er� o t�- o � � o o (7\ o _::rCC) r-i
Lr\ CO 00 C \O O Lr> C M CO Lr\ M
00 rl r-I r-I r-1 Lf\ r i Lr1 N N M
r-1 Lr\ rl N M CXR O
M
O
O x
x co
Cd Z Cd W
O H U) co co i-)
5~ I S~ N I
(d CJ) Cly H U x
H - fri H
O <d O 40 O cd
O 3 W W Z U O Z
+� < Cd cls O O - W •ra E +) az
N r i > q mw s~ O Ln w
> Aa H Ga r{ a c� rl a
0
Z co a\ O rl N M .� Ln �-
Cc co co O1 01 O1 � 01 O\ O\ O\ O\
M M M M M M M M M M M M
U -I r-I r l r i r I H H .--i rl H -I r i
N N N N N N N N N N N N
co O> E Cf) E a LLr\ IN
ri U) O U O
H U S-4 H U E CO N H
W C Z: N Q •U S N CH O M M
c� U H CH U b A 4-r •r♦ E-+ E fZ N CO O
Q CO M N H U Cd N C H H W N M
aM: Q w z a r� a m w a
W m CH r •ri r4 r� —4 .ri •r-1 •r-i -r-I • 1
a E Q E E E E E E E E E
as U O 6 N N U U N 0 N N N
= w rz rz rz rz rz rz rz a a
a
m �
E, v
z -4j
o cd
O
U
:4 C O ti C -zl, N O O O CO O1 -:I- �
O O Lr\ O U\ CO O O CO -:t ti N N
O O -� .� O O O> O -7 Co r-1
Lr\ CO CO O �,O O Ln M -zt CO T\ M
O 00 -1 H rl H U-,\ H Lr\ N N M
E r I In rl N M co L` C
M }�
-e9• b cn
F=. E-+
H H
Cl) cd H
a s-q O
r1 U
O C C O O O O O O O O O O N cd
U r-♦ H r-i r-I rl H H r-1 r1 r-I r-1 E C7 a
O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
r-I H H H r{ r•� r-1 r-1 r� r-I H H Q
an
d U O O O 00 00 00 00 m m co co co f.:_,I C co
12.
r1 H M C O O C C C O O O
M M M O O O O O O O O O
N
c H N H C O O O C O C O O
O H H M C O C O O O O O O
+-> v M M M O O C O O O C O O
u
O U O O N N N CO r-1 t- N r I O M
M N N N M N M N N N
M M N G\ D\ D1 O\ O\ G\ a1 a\ (J\
-� •ri
r I r1 H H H H H r4 H H H rl
Q1 O O O 03 00 00 c0 Cc) co CO 00
MEMO TO : John K. Anderson, City Administrator J 3
FROM: Judith S . Cox, City Clerk
RE : Amending City Code to Permit Hunting North of the River
DATE : October 3 , 1986
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
On June 3, 1985 the City entered into an agreement with the Depart-
ment of Natural Resources . The agreement provides that the City will
amend the city code to permit the use of shotguns with shotshells or bows
and arrows for public hunting north of the Minnesota River in the corporate
limits of Shakopee for property owned by the DNR north of the River within
the corporate limits of Shakopee.
The city attorney has prepared the attached ordinance for council
action. A revised ordinance will be on the table which will amend Section
10. 20 Subd. 4, paragraph B5 by expanding the area where such hunting is
allowed versus the attached ordinance exempting the DNR property from
Subdivisions 3 and 4 of Section 10. 20.
ALTERNATIVES :
11 Adopt Ordinance No. 2C7
2] Don' t adopt Ordinance No. 207
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Offer Ordinance No. 207 , An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, Amending Shakopee City Code , Chapter 10 Entitled "Public
Protection, Crimes and Offenses" by Adopting A New Paragraph D to Subd 4
of Sec . 10. 20 and Adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code Chapter 1
and Section 10. 99 Which Among Other Things Include Penalties, and move
its adoption.
jc
ORDINANCE NO. 207
Fourth Series
An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, amending Shakopee City
Code, Chapter 10 entitled "Public Protection, Crimes and Offenses" by
Adopting a new paragraph D to Subd 4 of Sec 10.20 and Adopting by
Reference Shakopee City Code Chapter 1 and Section 10.99 which among
other things include penalties
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
SECTION I: New Section added to Subd 4 as follows:
D. Nothing in Subdivisions 3 and 4 of Sec. 10.20 shall apply to lands in
the City of Shakopee located in Section 1, Township 115, Range 23, lying northerly
of the Minnesota River.
SECTION II: Adopted by Reference
The general provisions and definitions applicable to the entire City Code including
the penalty provisions of Chapter 1 and Sec. 10.99 entitled "Violations a Petty
Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated
verbatim herein.
SECTION III: When in Force and Effect
After the adoption, signing and attestation of this Ordinance it shall be published
once in the official newspaper of the City of Shakopee and shall be in full force and
effect on and after the date following such publication.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this day of 1986.
ATTEST: Mayor of the City of Shakopee
City Clerk
Prepared and approved as to form this
lst day of October, 1986.
ity Attorney
STATE OF 3 LL/
[rte rte. EEZ Oo Ir "
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
PHONE NO. 445-939's FILE NO.
r, vE: Sept. 22, 193)G
223
m
ildlife anager ,
223 Holmes Street, Room 101
Shakopee, 12T 55,379 SEP 1986
Shakopee Citi* Council
c/o John 1-iderson, Administrator CITY O HAK C'PE
129 1st Av. East
Shah,opee, T",T 55379
Dear Council Members:
This is to inform you that the Department of natural Resources has acquired
the property of the Hilda Ragaet estate in the Citi; of Shakopee. The tract
is described on the attached deed and nap.
Pursuant to the agreement , finalized on June 39 1985, between the City and
the Department, I request that the Council amend City Code 10.20, Subdiv. 41
to allow the discharge of shotguns vrith shotshells or bows and arrows for public
t your action at the earliest convenience
hunting in the described area. I reques
since I would like to get the area posted and opened by early October.
Thank you for considering this matter.
No special shotgun-slug deer hunt is planned for this fall. The City of
Chanhassen has already amended its ordinance to cover the rest of this
property.
?S *ncerel-,
P arker.
a Wildlife 1.1anager
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
) 3�
ORDINANCE NO.
Fourth Series
An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, amending Shakopee
City Code, Chapter 10 entitled "Public Protection, Crimes and Offenses"
by Repealing B-5 of Subd 4 of Section 10.20 and by Enacting a new B-5 of
Subd 4 of Section 10.20 and by Adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code
Chapter 1 and Section 10.99,which among other things include penalties
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECTION I: Repeal
B-5 of Subd 4 of Sec. 10.20 is hereby repealed.
SECTION II: Adoption of a New B-5 of Subd. 4 of Sec. 10.20.
That the area within which the shooting is done lies south of 13th Avenue
extended easterly and County State Aid Highway #16 and east of Spencer Street
also an
and County Road #79 afid j-. 'area within which said shooting is done lies in Section
1, Township 115, Range 23, Scott County, Minnesota lying northerly of the Minnesota
River and westerly of U.S. Highway 9x169.
SECTION III: Adopted by Referencd
The general provisions and definitions applicable to the entire City Code
including the penalty provisions of Chapter 1 and Sec. 10.99 entitled "Violations
a Petty Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though
repeated verbatim herein.
SECTION IV: When in Force and Effect
After the adoption, signing and attestation of this Ordinance, it shall be
published once in the official newspaper of the City of Shakopee and shall be in
full force and effect on and after the date following such publicaion.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota held this day of 1986.
ATTEST:
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
City Clerk
Prepared and approved as to form this 7th day of October, 1986.
C' Attorney
Memo To: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
From: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
Re: Delinquent Storm Drainage Bills
Date: October 3, 1986
Introduction & Background
Attached (on the table) is a list of the delinquent storm sewer accounts
for the first and second quarters of 1986. There are approximately 225
accounts that are delinquent (approx. $20,000) including both the yearly
and quarterly accounts. Third quarter bills have just been mailed, so
therefore even the 2nd quarter bills are approaching 90 days past due.
Accounts that have only the penalty as their past due amount (usually 69
cents to $5.00) have been eliminated from the list.
The City Attorney has said that all Council needs to do to put the
delinquent charges on next years taxes is to pass a resolution to that
effect. Staff will follow-up with a notice to those accounts. If
payment is received by December 31, 1986 the delinquent amount will be
removed from the parcel's 1987 tax statement. Since there already is a
penalty included for late payment no additional interest is added for
being placed on the tax rolls.
Action
Offer Resolution No. 2638.
GMV:mmr
RESOLUTION NO. 2638
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT STROM DRAINAGE
UTILITY BILLS FOR COLLECTION ON THE TAX ROLLS PAYABLE 1987
WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Council did create a storm drainage utility
pursuant to ordinance number 176, and
WHEREAS, the storm drainage utility is supported by user fees collected by
utility bills, and
WHEREAS, some utility bills are delinquent.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA,
that the delinquent storm drainage utility bills on the attached list are
hereby certified to the Scott County Auditor for collection with the 1987
property taxes.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this day of , 1986.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this day
of 1986.
City Attorney
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS
f �
PID M NdIC CD LEVY AMT
270010230 27 73 $15.16
270010280 27 73 $25.34
270010290 27 73 $14.45
270010400 27 73 $80.03
270010601 27 73 $130.07
270010611 27 73 $23.33
270010810 27 73 $22.24
270011060 27 73 514.45
270011190 27 73 $325.44
270011191 27 73 $107.73
270011211 27 73 $53.32
270011240 27 73 $20.58
270011280 27 73 5156.74
270011300 27 73 $93.40
270011340 27 73 $26.69
270011420 27 73 $22.24
270011501 27 73 $20.02
270011520 27 73 $60.03
270011650 27 73 $36.70
270011901 27 73 $16.68
270011940 27 73 514.45
270012220 27 73 514.45
270012510 27 73 $33.37
270012690 27 73 $22.24
270012900 27 73 514.45
270012960 27 73 514.45
270012961 27 73 SI4.45
270013020 27 73 $14.45
270013120 27 73 $14.45
270013270 27 73 $16.04
270013300 27 73 $22.24
270013640 27 73 $10.85
270013840 27 73 514.45
270014090 27 73 $22.24
270014130 27 73 $10.85
270015120 27 73 514.45
270015150 27 73 $14.45
270015430 27 73 $22.24
270015721 27 73 $10.85
270015730 27 73 $10.85
270015800 27 73 $14.45
270016340 27 73 $22.24
270016990 27 73 $14.45
270017130 27 79 $10.85
270017830 27 73 $10.85
270018030 27 73 $10.85
270018280 27 73 $14.45
270018620 27 73 $57.99
270018650 27 73 $107.73
270020260 27 79 $22.24
270030030 27 73 $26.65
270030210 27 73 $14.45
270030220 27 73 $107.73
270040050 27 73 $14.45
270040100 27 73 545.55
270040130 27 73 $14.45
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLLS
PID MUNIC CD LEVY ANT
270040230 27 73 $14.45
270040470 27 73 $14.45
270040640 27 73 $37.76
270040740 27 73 $14.45
270041100 27 73 $14.45
270041520 27 73 $14.45
270041521 27 73 $13.21
270041660 27 73 $14.45
270041690 27 73 $14.45
270041710 27 73 $14.45
270060170 27 73 $126.18
270060190 27 73 $71.07
270100170 27 73 $14.45
270120090 27 79 $22.24
270120640 27 73 $10.85
270120750 27 73 $14.45
270150130 27 73 $127.73
270150140 27 73 $27.09
270170010 27 73 $15.00
270170160 27 73 $14.45
270170400 27 73 $14.45
270170500 27 73 $14.45
270170630 27 73 $14.45
270170790 27 73 $14.45
270230010 27 73 $14.45
270240040 27 73 $14.45
270240110 27 73 $14.45
270240140 27 73 $7.22
270240360 27 73 $14.45
270240400 27 73 $14.45
270240590 27 73 $14.45
270240750 27 73 $14.45
270240790 27 73 $14.45
270241110 27 73 $14.45
270250050 27 73 $14.45
270250060 27 73 $14.45
270270250 27 73 $88.85
270310020 27 73 $14.45
270310100 27 73 $14.45
270310150 27 73 $14.45
270310210 27 73 $14.45
270310260 27 73 $14.45
270340130 27 73 $14.45
270340300 27 73 $14.45
270360140 27 73 $14.45
270360280 27 73 $14.45
270360380 27 73 $14.45
270360430 27 73 $9.63
270360470 27 73 $14.45
270360630 27 73 $14.45
270360640 27 73 $14.45
270360660 27 73 $14.45
270370040.._._.r...._.._.--.27. r _�..73w .. $14.-45-- -
270390090 27 73 $14.45
270390100 27 73 $14.45
270400260 27 73 $14.45
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS
PID RUNIC CD LEVY AMT
270400290 27 73 $14.45
270400470 27 73 $14.45
270410010 27 73 514.45
270410080 27 73 $14.45
270410100 27 73 $14.45
270430030 27 73 $14.45
270430040 27 73 514.45
270430060 27 73 514.45
270470010 27 73 $14.45
270470100 27 73 514.45
270470220 27 73 514.45
270470230 27 73 514.45
270520090 27 73 $14.45
270520100 27 73 $14.45
270520130 27 73 514.45
270530010 27 73 $14.45
270530080 27 73 $14.45
270560140 27 73 $14.45
270570020 27 73 $55.53
270570030 27 73 4131.06
270590010 27 73 $14.45
270590040 27 73 514.45
270600040 27 73 514.45
270610190 27 73 $14.45
270610230 27 73 414.45
270620050 27 73 $14.45
270630040 27 73 414.45
270630250 27 73 414.45
270640030 27 73 514.45
270650300 27 73 $14.45
270650320 27 73 S14.45
270720150 27 73 $14.45
270740110 27 79 514.45
270820140 27 73 514.45
270840190 27 73 $14.45
270840280 27 73 514.45
270840320 27 73 S12.44
270860020 27 73 $1034.06
270920010 27 73 514.45
270920030 27 73 514.45
270920150 27 73 $14.45
270920151 27 73 $14.45
270920170 27 79 514.45
270920171 27 73 514.45
270920370 27 73 $14.45
270920400 27 73 $14.45
270920440 27 73 $14.45
270920450 27 73 $14.45
270920460 27 73 514.45
270920470 27 73 $14.45
270970030 27 73 514.45
271000010 27 73 $60.14
271020050 27 79 $14.45
271020070 27 73 $14.45
271020090 27 73 514.45
271020130 27 73 514.45
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLLS
PID M UNIC CD LEVY AKT
271020140 27 79 $14.45
271040010 27 73 $15.54
271040030 27 73 $19.11
271040040 27 73 $12.44
271040050 27 73 $13.32
271040071 27 73 $14.45
271040080 27 73 $16.87
271060030 27 73 $14.45
271110020 27 73 $273.99
271140020 27 73 $14.45
279020230 27 73 $373.26
279020280 27 73 $5.91
279020330 27 73 $44.43
279030010 27 73 $4041.42
279030070 27 73 $344.32
279040010 27 73 $1319.28
279050070 27 73 $249.91
279050080 27 73 $87.74
279050110 27 73 $31.38
279050200 27 73 $104.30
279050260 27 73 $196.98
279050280 27 73 $260.07
279060105 27 73 $379.26
279060410 27 73 $14.45
279070390 27 73 $22.24
279060020 27 73 $14.45
279080060 27 73 $307.91
279080150 27 79 $14.45
279080280 27 73 $14.45
279080320 27 73 $8.15
279080630 27 73 $14.45
279090130 27 73 $6451.76
279120010 27 73 $136.06
279120031 27 73 $586.45
279120140 27 73 $444.28
279130350 27 73 $14.45
279130380 27 73 $14.45
279130550 27 73 $14.45
279130640 27 73 $14.45
279130730 27 73 $14.A5
279140012 27 73 $277.67
279140060 27 73 $14.45
279140070 27 73 $14.45
279140090 27 73 $14.A5
279140122 27 73 $14.45
279150200 27 73 $14.45
279150350 27 73 $14.45
279180091 27 73 $14.45
279180100 27 73 $14.45
279180130 27 73 $14.45
279190010 27 73 $14.45
279200060 27 73 $14.45
279290010 27 73 $14.45
279290071 27 73 $14.45
279290091 27 73 $14.45
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS
PID MUNIC CD LEVY AMT
279290160 27 73 $14.45
279300043 27 73 $14.45
TOTAL CERTIFIED AMOUNT $21795.10
END OF XEQ FILE
r
RESOLUTION NO. 2631
A Resolution Requesting the
Minnesota Department of Transportation to Provide
Traffic Control Devices on Trunk Highway 101
Within the City of Shakopee
WHEREAS , The City Council of the City of Shakopee is
continually interested in improving the traffic operations on
streets and highways within the City ; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to have installed certain
traffic control devices on Trunk Highway 101 to improve traffic
flow conditions at the intersection of Trunk Highway 101 and
Holmes Street.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: hereby requests the Minnesota
Department of Transportation to install the necessary traffic
control devices on Trunk Highway 101 within the City of Shakopee
to provide advance warning and control the full time prohibition
of turning movements from westbound Trunk Highway 101 to
southbound Holmes Street.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST :
City Clerk
Approved as to form this day of
19
City Attorney
+�1fId
13
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Enginee/5W—"'
SUBJECT; Resolution Requesting Traffic Control
Devices from Mn/DOT
DATE: September 26 , 1986
INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND:
At their September 16 , 1986 meeting, Council directed staff to
prepare a resolution requesting Mn/DOT to prohibit westbound T.H.
101 to southbound Holmes Street turning movements on a full time
basis. Attached is that resolution.
REQUESTED ACTION:
Offer Resolution No. 2631 , A Resolution Requesting the Minnesota
Department of Transportation to Provide Traffic Control Devices
on Trunk Highway 101 within the City of Shakopee and move its
adoption.
KA/pmp
MEMO
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administratorr)
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk\
RE: Appointment of Election Judges
DATE: September 30, 1986
Introduction and Background
State law requires the appointment of election judges for the
upcoming general election by October 10th. The judges
recommended have all been called and are willing to work.
Recommended Action
Offer Resolution No. 2632 , A Resolution Appointing Judges of
Election, and Establishing Compensation, and move its adoption.
JSC/jb
r J
RESOLUTION NO. 2632 1 '361
� C1
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING JUDGES OF ELECTION,
AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA,
that:
1. The following persons are hereby appointed Judges of Election for
the five polling precincts with the City of Shakopee designated
in Resolution No. 2021, adopted July 6 , 1982:
FIRST PRECINCT
Regular Judges Ann Noterman Winnie Anderson, CHR
Ruth O'Reillev Claude Kolb
Rose McCourtney Marcie Schmitt
Dorothy Breimhorst Lill Kopieca
Marie Kocks
SECOND PRECINCT
Regular Judges Paulette Rislund - CO-CHR Robert Kubes - CO-CHR
Lucille Odenwald Ruth Borchardt
Bervl Barrett Barbara Runge _
Ethel Schneider Esther Willemssen
Anna Mae Walsh George Mingo
Marilyn Lanq, -
THIRD PRECINCT
Regular Judges Maetta Jurewicz - CHR Loretta Jaspers
Jovice Schwartz Kathrvn Marschall
Susan Niewind Jan Gerold
Marinda Schmit Martha Skalskv
Ottillia Mingo
FOURTH PRECINCT
Regular Judges Lillian Weinandt - CHR Marilvn Johnson
Pat Clemens Svlvester Gerald
Doris Ann Solseth Al Schmitt
Sharon Fernholz Jermavne Leavitt
Hazel Ecklund Dolores Morke
Helen O'Brien
FIFTH PRECINCT
Regular Judges Virgilla Geske - CHR Carol Link
` Rudv Maurine Thea May
Corrine McDonald Louise Vyskocil
Joan Hart Cal Willemsson
2. The Election Judges shall be compensated for their work at the
rate of $3 . 40 per hour and the Chairman of the Election Judges
shall be compensated at the rate of $3 . 90 per hour.
3 . The proper officials be and hereby are authorized and directed to
do and perform all acts necessary to carry out the terms,
intents, and purposes of this Resolution.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1986 .
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1986.
City Attorney
/ 5 V
134
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator / S
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: 1987 Budget Resolutions
DATE: October 2, 1986
Introduction and Background
Attached are Resolution Number 2633 which consents to the HRA tax levy,
Resolution Number 2634 which sets the 1986/87 tax levy and Resolution Number
2636 which cancels certain debt service levies. These are in accordance with
the discussion and decisions made at the 9/30/86 Council meeting. Resolution
Number 2636 does contain transfers from the General Fund to the debt service
funds in 1986 so that it is clear and documented that funds are on hand to
replace canceled tax levies in 1987. The General Fund is reimbursed in 1987
through the tax levy for those transfers.
Action
Offer Resolutions Number 2633, 2636 and 2634.
RESOLUTION NO. 2636
A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR NOT TO LEVY A
TAX FOR DEBT SERVICE FOR SELECTED BOND ISSUES
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee has issued various bonds supported in whole or
in part by tax levies; and
WHEREAS, the tax levies for the various bond issues were set at the time of
bond sales; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee has determined to have
sufficient funds on hand to cancel certain tax levies for 1986/87.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA, that the following irrevocable fund transfers be made in 1986.
From the General Fund to:
1980A G.O. Improvement Bonds $33,748
1985 G.O. Improvement Bonds 858
1986A G.O. Improvement Bonds 28,150
1986B G.O. Improvement Bonds 2 180
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Auditor of Scott County is hereby
directed not to levy a tax for the bond issues and amounts as shown below:
Public Service Building Bonds $45,401 (partial)
1976 Improvement Bonds 14,137
1977B Improvement Bonds 6 370
1977C Improvement Bonds 28 048
1980A Improvement Bonds 55 748
1981A Improvement Bonds 5,167
1985 Improvement Bonds 858
1986A Improvement Bonds 28,150
1986B Improvement Bonds 2 180
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this day of 1986.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this day
of 1986.
City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. 2634
A RESOLUTION APPROVING 1986 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 1987
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, COUNTY OF SCOTT,
MINNESOTA, that the following sums of money be levied for the current year,
collectible in 1987, upon the taxable property in the City of Shakopee, for the
following purposes:
GENERAL FUND LEVY $1,310,240
SPECIAL LEVIES:
Industrial and Commercial Development $29,323
Public Pension Funds 5,000
TOTAL SPECIAL LEVY 34,323
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1,344,563
DEBT SERVICE SPECIAL LEVY
Public Service Building Bonds 61,437
TOTAL LEVY $1,406,000
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit
a certified copy to this resolution to the County Auditor of Scott County,
Minnesota.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this day of , 1986.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1986
City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. 2633
A RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL
TAX BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND
FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Shakopee was created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.411 et. seq. ,
as amended, and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 1965, Section 462.545 designates all the
territory within the area of operation of the authority as taxing districts for
the purpose of levying and collecting a special benefit tax, and
WHEREAS, Section 462.545 states that the special levy shall not exceed 10
cents on each $100 of taxable valuation in the area of operation, and
WHEREAS, MSA 273.1102 states that any tax rate shall not exceed 33.33 percent
of such maximum tax rate specified by law or charter.
WHEREAS, Section 462.545 states the governing body of the municipality must
give its consent to such a tax levy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA, that the City Council consents to and joins in a special tax levy of
$25,000 by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Shakopee for taxes payable in 1987.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota held this day of 9 1986.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1986.
City Attorney
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM• Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Resolution No. 2639
DATE: October 7, 1986
_Introduction and Background:
Resolution No. 2639 repeals the previous Resolution No. 2579
adopting an assessment split for Canterbury Park 2nd Addition. The
dollar amounts used were for 1985 instead of 1986 . This resolution
is the same as the old one, except for corrected dollar amounts.
Action:
Offer Resolution No. 2639 .
RESOLUTION NO. 2639
A RESOLUTION APPORTIONING ASSESSMENT AMONG NEW PARCELS CREATED
AS A RESULT OF THE SUBDIVISION OF LAND
PARCEL NO. 27-908-071-0 and NO. 27-909-013-0
AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 2579
WHEREAS, on March 7 , 1978 Resolution No. 1219 adopted by the
City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted by
construction of the 1977-1 Improvement Project, and
WHEREAS, on August 19, 1980 Resolution No. 1661 adopted by
the City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted
by construction of the 1979-1 CR-83 Utilities Project, and
WHEREAS, on August 25 , 1981 Resolution No. 1891 adopted by
the City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted
by construction of the 1981-1 VIP Interceptor, and
WHEREAS, two tracts of land benefitted by the said
improvements, known as parcel number 27-980-071-0 and number 27-
909-113-0 , have been partially subdivided into the plat of
Canterbury Park 2nd addition, and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to apportion
the installments remaining unpaid against said tracts among the
newly created parcels within the plat of Canterbury Park 2nd
Addition as well as the residual two parcels not part of the new
subdivision, and
WHEREAS, the property owners involved have been notified of
this proposed action.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE:
1. That Resolution No. 2579 is hereby repealed
2. That the 1986 payable remaining balance of assessments
to parcel 27-908-071-0 is $1,399 . 16 for the 1981-1 VIP
Interceptor; and that the 1986 payable remaining balance
of assessments to parcel 27-909-013-0 is $77. 46 for the
1977-1 Improvement Project and is $13 ,710. 68 for the
1979-7 CR-83 Utilities and are hereby apportioned as set
forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part
hereof.
3 . That all other parts of Resolution No. 1219 shall
continue in effect.
4. That all other parts of Resolution No. 1661 shall
continue in effect.
5 . That all other parts of Resolution No. 1891 shall
continue in effect.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City
of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1986•
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST;
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1986
City Attorney
V a�
r O G N N N N N N N N N
.D Q✓ W W W W W W W W Y
O 00000000 O
r
_J0000000 O z
W Y L W N r Co V Ln O
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
(D .O (D Cu cz,
O (D Y (D
Y fD
k-4 9
CD H CL
n (D ::S C1
r 77 = C3 ((D
Yrr En
z
co N
L, z .D z00rrr000 coo H
171 O O O o c c a) :: (D
Y Y r+ Y Y rt rt rt rt m rt rt :� rt
TQ
o\ Y \ Y F-+ F-+ Y rr --
O � In M In N Y N Y O O O (D O
N tti +— CA Co b C 1 w a CDD
7V 7• T' Y riLn
(�
T=7 ^ .YD CO Qa N N N Y
Y OON
b +.
\ Oo zLn n
- co O
m r
x Z O Cn M N
H
D -cn �
~ c1 rt co
Y
Li O (D.D w C6 rt
%�o •=J W Y In (D n Y
(D
h-� Ln R7 CON Cn V lD .p Ln rt H
O N N N O -J
rt
-cr> C)
V In H+ O to
V N N N W N
ON
U]
(D
V wCD N• PO .D
CN W Cn N rt I i
r W O N .D .O to !- 00 V
O CO Ln CO W Co to N (D W
coy
Cf� W V N OD
CC) W N Y 00 W m
In
v> O
Y W .D D1 - W 01 W W r7
CO _ .D o w .D .n ow r v, p,
V �"' A .D O O. Y 00
w0 O rn C1 V O co co V