Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/15/1986 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items DATE: July 10 , 1986 1 . Dave MacGillivery from Springsted has asked that I invite City Councilmembers to the Minnesota Horse and Hunt Club in Prior Lake, formerly known as the Wilderness. Springsted has a practice of taking their major clients out for dinner after bond sales. This should be discussed briefly at the Council meeting to select a date if Councilmembers are interested. If you are not interested we can just drop the idea. 2 . The City received an invitation from Schoell and Madson, Inc. , the engineering firm that serves SPUC. The purpose of the invitation is to celebrate their 30th anniversary and the retirement of Bill Schoell. The open house will be on Tuesday, July 15th from 3 : 00 p.m. to 7 : 00 p.m. at their corporate offices at 10550 Wayzata Boulevard, Minnetonka. 3 . The City Hall tour is scheduled for Saturday, July 19 , 1986 with vans leaving from the rear of City Hall at 8 : 00 a.m. sharp. The tour will last until approximately 1: 00 p.m. The purpose of the tour is to look at the interiors of a number of city halls in the metropolitan area. 4 . On July 3rd the City was served with papers ordering that a building permit or conditional use permit be issued to Wishing Well Farms , Inc. , or that we show cause before court on July 18 , 1986 for not issuing said permit. Copies of the orders were forwarded to Jack Coller for follow-up because Mr. Krass has a conflict of interest. On July 8th the City Clerk received a notice to take oral deposition of the City Council on July 16 , 1986 at 9 : 00 a.m. at the Courts Clerk' s Office in the Scott County Courthouse in Shakopee regarding Wishing Well Farms, Inc. It is our understanding that each Councilmember received a subpoena to this effect on July 8th. This will be discussed at a 6: 30 executive session before the regular Council meeting July 15th. 5 . Thank you letters were sent to all participating businesses and individuals, the Chamber of Commerce and other service organizations that provided funds or time for the Taste of Minnesota Festival. The attached memo lists the drawing winners. 6 . Attached is a public meeting notice for the 1987 work program and budget of the Metropolitan Council. Unless City Council directs staff to participate in these budget hearings we will not be attending them. The budget forecasts a 6% increase in the Met Council' s property tax levy for funding their operation. 7 . Attached is a letter to Barry Stock from Sandra Gardebring regarding the City' s resource recovery facilities . Please note Barry' s note on the bottom of the page. 8 . Attached for your information are the 1985 and 1986 affects of Fiscal Disparities on Scott County cities . This information is useful when discussing the overall tax burden/service benefits of various cities and townships in Scott County. 9 . Attached is an update on the Metropolitan Development Investment Framework from Judi Simac. 10. Attached is an update on the City' s efforts to keep the transportation analysis portion of our racetrack rezoning moving through the Mn/DOT bureaucracy. The City Planner and I will be meeting with Mn/DOT officials on Monday, July 14th to review their official response to our racetrack district proposals. We hope to have this on the July 22nd Council agenda for final action by Council. 11 . Attached is the building activity report for the month ending June 30, 1986 . 12 . Attached are the minutes of the Scott County Solid Waste Advisory Committee of May 21, 1986. Barry Stock asked that I include these minutes because they discuss issues listed in Sandra Gardebring' s letter which info item No. 7 above. 13 . Attached are the minutes of the May 5 and June 9 meetings of the City Hall Siting Committee. 14 . Attached is a brief synopsis from Jack Coller regarding his time spent as City Attorney from January 1, 1986 through June 30, 1986. 15 . Attached are the minutes of the June 2 , 1986 meeting of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 16. Attached is a memorandum from Ken Ashfeld regarding project status report. 17. Attached is an article from the July issue of Minnesota Cities entitled "Prosecuting Misdemeanors in Townships: Who Really Pays?" . 18 . Attached is a billing summary from Krass and Monroe as of June 25, 1986. 19. A meeting has been set for Monday, July 21 , 1986 at 3 : 00 P.m. with met Council staff to discuss the issue of Shakopee as a Developing Area as presented in the Position Statement of June 25 , 1986 . Mayor Reinke will be present. All Council members are invited to attend. Contact Judi Simac if you are planning to participate. 20 . Attached is a memo on the Capital Improvement Fund balance. This information was requested by Cncl. Lebens at a recent City Hall Siting Committee meeting. JKA/jms 5 Shakopee's part in the Taste of Minnesota on July 5, 1986 was a huge success. Winners of the give aways were: Overnight at Caterbury Inn plus two tickets to each of the five attractions - Judy Adams 724 Hague, St. Paul Overnight at Super 8 plus two tickets to each of the five attractions - Gerald D. -Johnson 4041 Quantico, Plymouth Overnight at Shakopee Valley Motel plus two tickets to each of the five attractions Lori Lifto 620 Gosiwin, Mahtomedi Two tickets to Valleyfair - Susan Foss 2419 Buchanan St. NE, Minneapolis Dave Mosley 11044 Woody Lane, Coon Rapids Two tickets to Canterbury Downs - Marlin Seifert 1490 E. Shore Drive, St. Paul Jan Ranum 11785 Monroe Street, Blaine Two tickets to Murphy's Landing - Judy Katzung 747 Ridge Street, St. Paul John Wolfe 447 Marshall, St. Paul Two tickets to Little Six Bingo - Gary Grove 1677 Glenview Ct. , Arden Hills Ruth DeMars 1442 Mississippi St. , Fridley Two tickets to Renaissance - Barb Munson 347 E. Maryland Ave, St. Pual Dick Hansen 6918 Homestead, Cottage Grove .fi ij METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Suite 300, Metro Square Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 101 PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE 1987 WORK PROGRAM AND BUDGET The Metropolitan Council's Management Committee will hold a public meeting to receive comments on the Council's proposed 1987 work program and budget. You are strongly encouraged to participate in this meeting and provide the committee with your input during the development stages of the budget document. The proposed budget was developed based on direction provided by members of the Metropolitan Council at a retreat in May. Priorities identified at the retreat for 1987 (in no particular order) include: 1 ) long-term care, 2) metro governance, 3) solid waste, 4) integration of human services policies into the Metropolitan Development and investment Framework; 5) economic and fiscal research and 6) airports/land use compatibility. From a financial standpoint, the proposed budget was prepared within t+qe context of financial forecasts that project reductions in federal grant revenues and dictate a reduction in the Council's expenditures and staff. The Management Committee will be reviewing the proposed document during July and August. The Council will hold a public hearing Sept. 11 prior to its final adoption of the 1987 work program and budget on Sept. 25. Enclosed is a summary of the proposed work program and budget. Copies of the full budget document will be available July 11 . PUBLIC MEETING INFORMATION When: Tuesday, July 22, 1986, 9 a.m. Where: 3rd Floor, Metro Square Building 7th and Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota Who will Local officials be notified: Minority organizations Business organizations Council advisory committees How to 1 . You may attend the meeting and offer comments. participate: To register to speak in advance, please call Jane Larson at 291-6500. 2. You may send a letter with comments to: Alan Morris Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Any Call the Council's Finance Division and talk to: questions: Alan Morris (291-6446) or Tim Fleetham (291-6374) . To receive a copy of the document call 291-6464. p METROPOLITAN COUNCIL'S PROPOSED 1987 WORK PROGRAM AND BUDGET � `� E ri A SUMMARY J U L "6 BUDGET ` �' 0 F SHAK0PEF o The proposed Council budget for 1987 is $11 .6 million. This represents a 5 percent drop from last year's amended budget of $12.3 million. I o The largest share of the Council's proposed budget, 59 percent, will come from a local property tax levy. o Twenty-one percent of the revenues will come from federal sources; 2 percent from state sources. The remaining 18 percent will come primarily from reimbursements from regional agencies--which provide services such as sewers, transit, highways, parks, airports and sports facilities--and f rout interest income and other sources. o In 1987, the federal share of the Council's budget will fall 16 percent from its 1986 level, and the local share will rise 6 percent. State revenues will remain fairly constant. WORK PROGRAM Council priorities for 1987 include: o Long-term care. Continue efforts to gain improvements in the cost and quality of long-term care for chronically ill and physically and mentally handicapped people. Develop a legislative proposal that will make public funding for long-term care projects more flexible. Improve access to long- term care by examining issues related to the transition from acute health care facilities to community services. Assist communities in coordinating long-term care services by developing comprehensive plan guidelines and an incentive fund. Evaluate cost effectiveness and risks related to providing home-based health services. o Metro governance. Develop mechanisms for improved financial, managerial and performance accountability of regional services for hiQhwaITS, transit performance ..b �..r...J , .., parks, sewers, airports and sports facilities. Develop stronger and more concise policies and directives dealing with service delivery and systems management. Develop a comprehensive and responsible fiscal planning and reporting program and a process for tracking success in implementing adopted plans. o Solid waste. Facilitate the development of a regional solid waste system to eliminate dependence on landfills. Continue to review county plans for recycling, composting, burning and making fuel for energy. Continue to administer grant and loan programs to support local waste-reduction efforts. Explore ideas such as centralized composting of yard wastes, processing centers to make recyclables more marketable, and separation of recyclables at mass-burn or fuel-making plants. Prepare reports to the legislature on the success of the region's abatement activities. o Integration of a human services perspective into the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework (MDIF) ._ Analyze the impact of demographic trends on human service needs in the region. Examine financial incentives that affect elderly people, disadvantaged populations, and the housing and health care systems. Develop new policies. Hold public meetings and hearings. o Economic and fiscal research. Increase economic/fiscal analysis in Council research, policy development and policy implementation. Examine ways to help local governments and regional agencies adjust to federal and state budget cuts. Analyze fiscal issues related to Council work in solid waste, highways, transit and sewers. o Airports/land use compatibility. Reduce land use conflicts between airport operations and the communities surrounding them. Continue to work with the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) on activities to mitigate noise impact at airports. Review cities' plans for development around regional airports to see if the plans conform with Council guidelines on land use compatibility for aircraft noise. REVIEW SCHEDULE Following is the final schedule for review of the Council's 1987 work program and budget. July 15 Management Committee review July 22 Management Committee review Public meeting to receive comments July 24 Management Committee review August 5 Management Committee recommends 1987 work program and budget for public hearing August 7 Council adoption of 1987 work program and budget for public hearing August 12 Management Committee discussion (if necessary) August 19 Management Committee discussion (if necessary) September 11 Council public hearing on 1987 work program and budget September 16 Management Committee review and recommendation September 24 Hearing record closes September 25 Council adopts 1987 work program and budget a� '� G Metropolitan :,eunci! ��F- G 300 Metro Square Buildin7 Seventh and Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 June 25, 1986 Telephone (612) 291-6359 �witici��r� Barry A. Stock City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 Dear Mr. Stock: Thank you for providing your city's resolution concerning the variance to the Metropolitan Council. The Council has been requested by the proposer to delay considerations of the variance for 90 days. The Environmental Resources Committee of the Council has acted to table the issue for 90 days pending the completion of the remedial investigation/feasibility study. The Council appreciates the comments forwarded by the city and will keep you apprised of upcoming meetings addressing this issue. The use of landfill space in the region has been monitored by the Council for a number of years. The landfill space in Scott County will be exhausted in less than three years. Consequently, the county and the city of Shakopee will need to find alternatives for handling solid waste and residuals. The waste will likely go to Dakota county causing increased traffic at those sites. The movement of waste in the region will be disrupted as landfills close, pending the development of processing capacity by the counties. The variance request demonstrates the need for counties to proceed with their solid waste planning process to implement alternatives to landfilling and cities, in turn, need to aid the counties in their efforts to avert even greater solid waste service disruptions than those shown in the variance request. The Council is assured by your city's concern that it will provide the necessary assistance needed to develop long-term solutions to the solid waste management problem. Sincerely, Sandra S. ardebring Chair SSG:JR:sd Note: The Scott/Carver Co my resource recovery facility should be operational in the Fall of 1988 . At the present time, the County has received several proposals from vendors for the construction of a facility. A consultant is being hired by the County to evaluate the proposals. A final site for the plant has not been selected at this time. However, the existing Lousville Landfill is the favored site by both counties. 0 An Equal Opportunity Employer MN House of Rep. Research Deot., May 12, 1986. + Current Law fiscal Disparities Contr/Distr, Payable 1985 vs 1986 (1000 doltors). PAYABLE 1995 PAYABLE 19M 1915 19$¢ 615TR COMTR GAIN/ DISTR CONTR LCIS/ TAXABLETVALUE LOSS SCOTT CCUXT7 CITIES: 1 BELLE.PLAINE S 2765 S 495 S 2271 S 273E S 455 S 2242 23.50. 23.6Z. ELKO 265 33 232 310 36 274 25.71 30.39 JORDAN 3239 713 2526 3109 663 2446 33.14 32.10 NEW MARKET 285 34 251 305 23 282 26.79 30.17 PRIOR LAKE 4843 1614 3229 5133 1581 3551 6.40 7.04 SAVAGE 2772 3726 -954 3132 4135 -1003 -3.09 -3.25 SHAKOPEE 5274 15083 -9809 5959 176" -11684 -13.26 -15.80 T06WS: BELLE PLAINE 225 57 169 250 56 194 2.43 2.80 BLAKELEY 174 45 129 197 40 156 3.33 4.02 CEDAR LAKE 660 69 590 739 64 675 5.91 6.76 CREDIT RIVER 1512 136 1376 1618 143 1475, 12.33 13.22 HELENA 460 154 306 515 145 371 3.47 4.20 u JACKSON 1708 413 1295 1674 413 1261 29.09 28.32 LOUISVILLE 4.4.6 695 -250 477 681 -2D4 -4.99 -4.D9 NEW MARKET 752 248 504 880 238 642 4.71 6.D0 SAND CREEK 764 172 592 825 177 648 6.93 7.59 SPRING LAKE 1425 141 1284 1581 146 1435 9.82 10.97 ST LAWRENCE 146 135 12 169 114 55 0.43 2.06 WASHINGTON COUNTY CITIES: AFTON 1158 825 333 1134 784 351 1.75 1.84 BAYPORT 2204 1951 253 2380 2243 137 1.68 0.91 BIRCHWO00 483 17 466 459 17 442 6.17 5.85 COTTAGE GROVE 14467 5198 9269 15767 5405 103 - 9.92 11.09 DELLWOOD 225 200 25 230 228 1 0.19 0.01 FOREST LAKE 3539 3546 .7 3716 3617 99 -0.03 0.36 HASTINGS (WASH) 18 50 -32 15 60 -45 -20.59 -28.75 HUG0 2533 1511 1022 2634 1375 1259 5.21 6.42 LAKE ELMO 3589 1477 2112 3732 1535 2196 6.52 6.78 LAKE ST CROIX BEACH 889 42 847 960 46 914 18.26 19.70 LAKELAND 1243 210 1033 1243 332 911 9.70 8.56 LAKELAND SHORE 8D 19 61 69 28 41 3.50 2.34 C LANDFALL 2799 36 2763 2435 79 2356 311.00 265.22 -MAHTOMEDI 2258 433 1825 2393 355 2038 7.73 8.63 14ARINE-ON-ST CROIX 215 60 155 219 70 149 3.28 3.17 NEWPORT 2218 1505 713 2218 2152 65 3.26 0.30 CAK PARK HEIGHTS 1106 2115 -1009 1183 3150 -1967 -2.11 -4.12 OAKDALE 10405 1525 8881 10508 2012 8496 14.72 14.08 PINE SPRINGS 134 26 107 159 27 132 3.31 4.06 S.T MARYS POINT 213 16 197 187 13 175 8.23 7.30 ST PAUL PARK 4167 1570 2597 4375 1617 2758 14.15 15.03 STILLWATER 8529 4415 4114 8869 5032 3837 6.01 5.61 WHT BEAR LK (WASH) 68 22 46 163 36 126 3.95 10.79 WILLERNIE 761 74 686 707 127 580 32.49 27.47 WOODB RY 5510 8414 -2904 6225 9086 -2860 -2.96 -2.91 101dw s: SAYTOWN 439 303 136 443 330 113 2.38 1.98 DENMARK 371 456 -85 423 538 -115 -0.81 -1.09 FOREST LAKE 3274 544 2730 3306 511 2795 9.02 9.23 GRANT 1481 721 760 1467 873 594 3.09 2.42 ,GREY CLOUD ISLAND 146 172 -26 156 134 22 -0.98 0.82 MAY 887 70 817 931 130 801 4.93 4.83 NEW SCANDIA 1582 361 1222 1677 364 1313 7.20 7.74 STILLWATER 675 8 667 763 10 753 4.95 5.59 MEST LAKELAND 667 273 394 680 338 342 4.33 3.76 3 k-'sL l t t�o��Q'►'� ` I����j`le J rl`�1� � _ q y Mk House of Rep. Research Dept., May 12, 1986. S Currant Last FiscaL Disparities Contr/Distr, Payable 1985 vs 1986 (1000 dollars). PAYABLE 1986 PAYABLE 1986 19e5 1986 DISTR CONTR GAIN/ DISTR CONTR GAIN/ EFFECT ON LOSS LOSS TAXABLE VALUE CaNTY ANOKA S 164731 S 81769 S 82962 S 171671 S 83"2 S 88229 8.42% 8. CARVER 25018 13666 11352 25743 13395 12348 4.80 5.22 DAKOTA 125067 114132 10934 132734 123356 9378 0.86 0.74 HENNEPIN 528814 679094 -150280 548398 760857 -212459 2.02 -2.85 RAMSEY 313838 312727 1111 322815 262339 60477 0.04 2.08 SCOTT 27717 23964 3753 29612 26756 2856 1.45 1.10 WASHINGTON 78332 38165 40167 81827 42655 39172 5.52 5.38 Metro Total: 1263517 1263517 0 1312801 1312801 0 i Memo To: John K. Anderson, City Administor From: Judi Simac, City Planner Re: Update on Metropolitan Developement Investment Framework Date: July 1 , 1986 Today I attended a meeting of the Southwest Communities group Re: the MDIF. John Boland, the group lobbyist informed us that the committee of Met Council members which conducted the public hearing were impressed with the conduct of the meet- ing and the presentation made by each individual community. Policy makers should be commended for delivering direct comments in a short time frame. Mayor Reinke did an excellent job. Obviously the Met Council members were suprised to learn of Shakopee ' s desire to become a part of the "developing area" . The public hearing on the MDIF will close on July 15 . Met Council staff have indicated that the comments received will be worked into a redraft of the- document which would go to the Development Committee at the earliest date of August 7th. De- pending on the contents the committee may want to have more public hearings on the redraft. Members of the Southwest Group will be meeting with Met COuncil staff to "rewrite" the priority policies . Individual council people are willing to meet to discuss the regional forecast concept, it is clear that staff people won' t budge on regional forecasts. At a previous meeting that John Boland had had with Pat Pahl and other staff people, it was recommended by Ms. Pahl that the group work specifically with Met Waste on getting the necessary capacities in the expanded Blue Lake Plant. We need to have our own sewer allocation figures for future capacity by July 22 , 1986 for a meeting with Met Waste. I will work with the City Engineer on this issue. I have not received any calls or comments from the Met Council Staff in regard to the Position Statement which the City has submitted. I would like to give them another week or so be- fore I contact them, mainly because we are also awaiting comment on our Sewer Plan Amendment. cc: Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 1610 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454 612-332-0421 July 1, 1986 Mr. John Anderson Administrator, City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear John: In response to your inquiry on the status of the proposed County Road 83/TH 101 interchange geometric revisions given MnDOT on May 8th, I made a few calls to involved individuals. Apparently the lack of traffic forecast figures for this project has been a major factor in approval processing delays. Never-the-less the Golden Valley MnDOT office, did, upon receipt of the Shakopee Plan 3 proposal , review the plan and add some alternative modifications, then on May 20, 1986, forward layouts to the central office for their review. That review is not yet complete. Preliminary findings, however, indicate some problems that will require resolution. They include but are not limited to the following: - Concern for the loss of free right turns for traffic on southbound CR 83 going westbound on TH 101. - Concern for CR 83 traffic congestion (blocking) resulting from north to west movements to the track between Secretariate and 12th Avenue. - 'T'he location of two transmission towers in the southwest quadrant that may require an alignment shift. - The need for traffic data for an in-depth review. - Review and recommendations by the central office traffic engineer. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. July 1, 1986 Page 2 The review results to date are considered very preliminary and subject to negotiation according to the central office preliminary design representative who conducted their review (Mr. Marvin Hanson) . It will be Carl Hoffstedt's responsibility to sum up MnDOT's comments when he returns from vacation and the central office review is complete. It appears that meetings will be required to iron out differences and best possible solutions. In response to your question "what can be done to expedite the process?" it is my opinion, based on negative results of the past, that it is not advisable to go around the district office people to put pressure on. You ultimately must deal with the people you end up alienating yourselves with. John, I would wait until Carl gets back (July 7th) and put the pressure on him as Project Manager. We remain available for any services you may want to consider us for. sincerely, Z Bruce L. Warz a, P.E. Senior Associate BLW:kro CITY OF SHAKOPEE BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT PERMITS ISSUED June, 1986 Yr. to Date Previous Year Number Number Valuation Number Valuation Mo. Ytd. Single Fam-Sewered 9 24 1 , 992 , 574 3 19 1 , 183 , 000 10 922 , 400 1 3 239 , 843 Single Fam-Septic 3 917 , 600 Multiple Dwellings 1 4 2, 890 , 000 1 7 - (# Units) (YTD Units) (4) (100) - (4) (18) Dwelling Additions 7 26 149 , 735 6 23 81 , 538 Other 4 4 76 , 400 5 103 , 222 Comm New Bldgs - 4 8, 500 , 000. - 5 2, 090, 341 Comm Bldg. Addns - 3 887 , 267 3 10 9 , 646, 010 Industrial-Sewered - - 5, 475 Ind-Sewered Addns 1 2 4, 290 , 000 1 1 - Industrial-Septic - - _ - - _ Ind-Septic Addns - Accessory/Garages 2 12 68 , 200 4 19 131, 418 Signs & Fences 9 42 68 , 794 4 31 25, 188 Fireplaces/Wood Stove 1 2 2, 677 1 5 11, 380 Grading/Foundation 1 10 322 , 700 2 5 51, 000 Remodeling (Res) 3 11 32, 300 2 10 45, 095 Remodeling (Inst) - - 1 1 1, 093 , 000 Remodeling (Comm/Ind) 5 27 4 , 157 , 840 2 19 1, 512, 178 TOTAL TAXABLE 49 181 24 , 360 , 887 33 173 16 , 222 , 548 TOTAL INSTITUTIONAL - - - 1 1 1, 093 , 000 GRAND TOTAL 49 181 24 , 360 , 887 34 174 17 , 315, 548 No. Ytd. No. Ytd. 6 2 10 Variances - 3 18 Conditional Use 1 19 _ 1 4 Rezoning - _ 2 Moving 1 2 Electric 40 147 25 132 Plbg & Htg 46 181 20 119 Razing Permits _ - Residential Commercial - - Total dwelling units in City after completion of all construction permitted to date. . . . . . . 3, 963 Cora Hullander Bldg. Dept. Secretary CITY OF SHAKOPEE BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IN JUNE, 1986 7096 Gary Gregus 1069 Van Buren Alt. $ 1 , 400 7097 Mark Albu 221 E. 1st Ave. Alt. 300 7098 Amcon 4571 Valley Ind. Blvd. Addn. 690 , 000 7099 Scott Bldrs . 1244 Canterbury Rd. Alt. 400, 000 7100 Laurent Bldrs . 2378 Hauer Trail House 69, 000 �S ,B3 %a 7101 Joseph Link 1058 M�arscallRd. House 69, 000 7102 Elmer Marschall Co? Rd."77 Grading 1, 000 7103 Clete Link 1440 W. 3rd Stg. Bldg. 10 , 000 7104 Laurent Bldrs . 1192 Limes one Dr. House 85 , 000 7105 Menke Builders 1246 Li.m stone Dr. House 60 , 000 7106 E.L. Prahm ` 535 Lewis Demolition 5, 000 7107 E.L. Prahm 535 Lewis House 120, 000 7108 John Radermacher 425 Lewis Addn. 1, 200 7109 Clete Link 1216 Mon e Q House 78, 700 7110 Laurent Builders �p2061 �. 13th / 4-plex 60, 000 7111 Laurent Builders 2063 W. 13th 4-plex 64, 000 7112 Laurent Builders 2065 W. 13t 4-plex 66 , 000 7113 Laurent Builders 2067 W. 1 t 4-plex 60, 000 40� 7114 E.W. Prenevost 1137 Madiso Addn. 4 , 975 7115 Robert Jasper 2330 Ber Drive House 81, 000 7116 Laurent Bldrs . 1022 Co. Rd. 77 House 110, 000 19 its .z.y 7117 Alton Geske 1150 Menke ircle House 82, 000 7118 Cliff Michaelis 1039 Prairie Fence 1, 000 7119 Leonard Widmer 9315 Boiling Sp. Ln. Fence 300 7120 Joseph Watson 201 W. 1st Ave. Sign 100 7121 Leroy Signs, Inc . 8000 Hwy 101 Sign 500 7122 Nordquist Signs 5101 Valley Ind. Blvd. Sign 1 , 500 7123 Quality Pools 1224 Shakopee Ave. Pool 17 , 900 7124 Kraus-Anderson 1244 Canterbury Road Pool 53 , 000 7125 Heat-N-Glo 1145 Merrifield Fireplace 1, 177 7126 Gordon Grannes 5015 Eagle Creek Blvd. Stg. Bldg. 700 7127 Summit Bldrs . 934 Atwood Addn. 11, 000 7128 Bruce Hedin 2070 Foot ill Tr. House 75, 900 7129 Jasper Homes 1216 Lim ne Dr. House 65 , 000 �-� ,may - ,, < 7130 Scenic Signs 1147 Co. Rd. 83 Sign 5 , 500 7131 Scenic Signs 1147 Co. Rd. 83 Sign 1, 800 7132 C.H. Carlson 1164 Merrifield Court Alt. 900 7133 Joe Topic 203 1st. Ave. Alt. 2, 000 7134 Ronald Gratz 335 E. 7th Ave. Addn. 1, 600 7135 Scott Builders 1244 Canterbury Road Alt. Included in BP #7056 7136 B & D Development 2325 Berg rive House , 125, 000 7137 Randy Schubert 8358 Eagle Creek Blvd? Alt. 4, 000 7138 Nordquist Sign 1244 Canterbury Road Sign 12, 000 7139 Tim Perrier 911 Holmes Addn. 600 7140 Void 7141 Menke Const. 2240 Marschall Rd. Addn. 3, 000 7142 Leon Markgraf 1186 Jackson St. Fence 150 7143 Dale Delaney 8296 Horizon Drive Addn. 13, 500 7144 Elder Jones 448 W. First Ave. Alt. 21, 000 7145 Doug Carlson 3000 Co. Rd. 42 House 90, 000 -z 9 i/.s .z--�' 7146 NuWood Landscape 532 Spencer St. Ret. Wall 500 MINUTES Scott County Solid Waste Advisory Committee May 21 , 1986 Members Present : Emil Flicek - City of New Prague Barry Stock - City of Shakopee Margaret Maxa - City of New Market Dick VanTassel - Village Sanitation Joe Pahl - Louisville Landfill Curt Brekke - City of Belle Plaine Dennis Fredrickson - Buckingham Disposal Ed Gregory - Waste Management Pat Skelly - Citizen of Belle Plaine Al Frechette - Scott County Environmental Health Jan Flesland - Scott County Environmental Health Members Absent : Stan Harger - Citizen of New Prague Dave Unmacht - City of Prior Lake Ray Miller - City of Savage Bob Morgan - City of Jordan Guests : Tom Caswell - Metropolitan Council Staff Mike Lein - Carver County Ray Joachim - Metropolitan Council Member The meeting began at 3 : 05 PM with Jan Flesland calling for approval of the minutes . Motion for approval was made by Margaret Maxa and seconded by Barry Stock. The minutes were approved . Mike Lein, representing Carver County, presented an update on the status of Carver County' s planning. He reported that the Carver County Solid Waste Advisory Committee will be meeting next reek. Following that meeting, he anticipates seeking approval to hire a consultant ( to evaluate waste management proposals ) from the Carver County Board . Al Frechette outlined the procedure for hiring consultants , stating that a request for proposals would be mailed to a list of potential consultants . They would be asked to outline their plans for evaluating the waste management proposals which the counties have received . Evaluation would include a review of the advantages and disadvantages of each proposal , its technical feasibility, and financial viability. In addition, the consultant selected would be asked to consider the possibility of a county owned and leased facility which might give the counties more control and , thus , protection. Scott and Carver Counties would expect to share the cost of hiring the consultant . Al Frechette provided information regarding Dakota County 's planning process , stating that on May 15, Dakota County determined to negotiate exclusively with Resource Conversion/Swentec for a facility which would generate electricity for sale to NSP. Resource Conversion/Swentec is very interested in including Scott and Carver Counties ' wastes in the project (the "alternative" listed in their proposal ) . No site has been selected for the facility as yet although locations in Burnsville and Rosemount have been discussed . Comments regarding Reuter ' s permit applications for Eden Prairie and interest in a Scott/Carver Counties "sister project" followed , with the discussion centering on the advantages of continued negotiations with several vendors versus exclusive negotiations at this point . Barry Stock moved ( second by Ed Gregory) to recommend that the Scott County Board direct staff to solicit proposals from consultants to assist in evaluating vendor proposals . During the discussion which followed the motion Mike Lein indicated that the Carver County Board would not be meeting again until June 11th, at which point Al Frechette suggested that the Scott County Board might send a letter to the Carver County Board expressing an interest in working together ( letter to be read at the June 11th meeting) . Issues raised included the environmental effects of landfill technology versus the "new" technologies currently being promoted--is there certainty that these new systems are safer for the environment , and the technical viability of the proposals received by the counties--a concern that in the past vendors have sold equipment and "disappeared" with no committment to ensure that the system will work . It was suggested that these were questions which should be asked of the consultant selected . Mike Lein suggested that we consider having the consultant selected to review the vendor proposals evaluated by another consultant . Barry Stock proposed that staff narrow the choice of Possible consultants to three or four and then form a subcommittee composed of representatives of both Scott and Carver Counties ' Solid Waste Advisory Committees to participate in interviews of this short list of candidates , and to make a recommendation to the county boards as to which consultant to hire . The question was called and the motion passed unanimously. Al Frechette reported that Scott County would have more data regarding the environmental effects of the landfill than most counties have had for their decision making process because an environmental risk assessment is currently underway at Louisville Landfill . Dick VanTassel expressed concern regarding the integrity of the vendors--would they provide sufficient service , respond quickly to problems , etc. Ed Gregory reported that his trip to a solid waste convention in New Orleans raised serious doubts in his mind regarding the economic viability of RDF and recycling. He also questioned whether the limited reduction in landfill volumes offered by many vendors is really worth the expense . Ed felt that for maximum volume reduction and system reliability mass burn seemed best . A brief discussion of potential RDF markets in Shakopee followed . The prison, hospital , and courthouse complexes were suggested as possibilities. Tom Caswell stated that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is considering new rules which would require air emission standards compliance from RDF users as well as manufacturers . In other comments Ed Gregory stated that he felt whichever vendor was selected should guarantee markets , put the system on line , and prove that it works. Barry Stock offered an "editorial comment" stating that he doesn ' t like monopolies, doesn' t support monopolies , and feels that a transfer station is out of the question. Mike Lein reported slow progress in Blue Earth County ' s planning efforts with NSP, due in part to sufficient landfill capacity and relatively low tipping fees . The meeting was adjourned at 4 : 08 PM on a motion by Dick VanTassel , seconded by Ed Gregory. The next meeting is set for Wednesday, June 18, ant 3 : 00 PM. CITY HALL SITING COMMITTEE Monday, May 5 , 1986 6 : 30 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers Chairman Leroux called the meeting to order at 6 : 34 p.m. Present were Dave Cza3a, Dolores Lebens and Gloria Vierling. Also present were Jack Boarman representing Boarman Architects and John Anderson the City Administrator. John Leroux introduced Jack Boarman who explained that his firm was preparing a work schedule and would like to discuss it with the Committee. Specifically, Jack was interested in receiving the Committee ' s comments regarding preparations for a bond election in September or November. Jack referred to his letter of May 2 , 1986 to John Anderson requesting that the City provide information to assist the architects in preparation of overall space needs and preparation for the bond election. Dave Rockne arrived at 6 :38 p.m. Jack explained that the City could not promote the bond issue, but merely present it to the public. The role of promoting the bond issue can be done by a citizen' s committee and Jack recommended this approach. He explained both the pros and cons of using a citizen' s committee. He also indicated that he would act as recorder for the committee and that Councilmembers could attend meetings without feeling obligated to participate. Dolores, Gloria and John all mentioned that the Committee had spent two years analyzing sites and that they had discussed the process with other citizens. The consensus was that the Siting Committee should make the final site decision before a committee is asked to work on space needs, building design, etc. for a specific project to be presented to the voters . John Anderson was instructed to provide Jack with the file containing the minutes, etc. from the past two years of work by the Committee. John Leroux asked that the architect develop a carefully plotted time line with key dates. Jack agreed and said he would prepare one for the Committee. The time line was discussed and it was tentatively agreed that the final site would be selected within the next 30 to 60 days, and that a letter should be carefully structured inviting citizens to serve on a committee to promote the bond issue. Jack explained the possible size and make up the committee. Dave Czaja asked for a clarification of the process the architect planned to follow. Jack explained that the process would be divided into two parts. Part I would be a factual analysis of each of the three sites based upon space needs, acquisition costs, construction costs, parking requirements, site accessability, etc. He said the Committee would have a checklist for use in analyzing the final sites. Dave indicated that this was precisely what was needed so that the Committee could clearly explain to the citizens why one or the other site had been selected. John Leroux summarized the meeting noting that the architect would provide the Committee with a factual analysis of the three sites , a carefully documented time table, and assist the Committee in forming a citizen' s committee to present the bond issue to the voters after a site had been selected. M/S/P Czaja/Rockne to adjourn at 7 : 15 p.m. John K. Anderson Recording Secretary 13 MINUTES CITY HALL SITING COMMITTEE MEETING June 9 , 1986 The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 8 : 30 p.m. Present were Gloria Vierling, Dave Czaja, John Leroux, Dolores Lebens and Dave Rockne. Also present were John Anderson, the City Administrator, Terry Forbord representing the Downtown Committee and Jack Boarman, the City' s architect for the project. M/S/P Lebens/Vierling to approve the minutes of the April 7 , 1986 and May 5 , 1986 meetings of the Siting Committee. The Committee reviewed the time table proposed by Boarman Archi- tects. Questions were asked about the proposed newsletter. Jack Boarman provided the Committee with an illustration 'of ' a similar newsletter he was preparing for the City of New Prague which is also involved in a city hall project. Jack clarified that the newsletter would not replace communication through the local news media, which he said would be responding as they normally do to municipal projects. Dolores Lebens asked the City Administrator to check on the status of the fund balance in the Capital Improvement Fund (CIF) and the former Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Fund to determine how much money was available for the project and how much had been spent on other capital improvement projects. The Committee then discussed a specific time table for selection of the final alternative site, setting a tentative meeting date of July 7th for the Committee with subsequent Council action on July 15th. The Committee also discussed the possibility of touring other city halls in the metropolitan area and tentatively set July 19th from 8 : 00 a.m. to 1 : 00 p.m. as the date for the tour. The tour would include Committee members, Councilmembers and department heads. Dave Czaja brought up the subject of including a community center or parts of a community center in the new city hall. He felt that adding community center facilities would make better use of the building and create more of a focal point for community activities. After considerable discussion it was decided that the majority of the Committee did not support including additional community center facilities in the proposed city hall. Jack Boarman then asked a series of questions seeking to clarify the Committee ' s thinking behind each of the three sites he has been requested to analysis. He inquired about the ownership and operation of the Library, the reasoning behind the site adjacent to the County Courthouse and the Hospital and the reasoning i behind the Committee selection of the site adjacent to the Police and Public Works building. Jack noted that the site adjacent to the Courthouse and Hospital would have high acquisition and relocation costs. Dolores Lebens added that if some of the long time residents and their extended family members are against the acquisition and relocation they could possibily have a negative impact on any bond election. Jack summarized the philosophy behind the Committee ' s selection of the three sites as follows: ( 1 ) the Library site was seen by him as a retail site placing city hall activities in a retail setting, ( 2 ) the Hospital and County Courthouse site was an institutional site with some retail characteristics, and ( 3 ) the Gorman Street site was also an institutional site because it grouped the bank, Shakopee Public Utilities building and the City Public Works building with a new city hall. There were no additional comments or questions from the committee and Terry Forbord asked to be recognized by the Chairman. He reviewed several key points made by Jack Boarman and asked that he carefully consider several additional points in evaluating the three sites: ( 1 ) the site could serve as the catalyst to remove blighted buildings, ( 2 ) the site could represent a "flag ship" development for redeveloping the downtown, ( 3 ) the Downtown Committee felt that Shakopee was unlike other suburbs and had its own history and a downtown and desired to keep its downtown intact, and ( 4 ) Terry eluded to the fact that the current City Police/Public Works building was more of a utility and industrial use, and that the City might find it inappropriately located fifteen to twenty years from now thus making it less desirable as a location for clustering institutional buildings. John Leroux thanked Terry Forbord for his comments and called for a motion to adjourn. M/S/P Lebens/Czaja to adjourn at 10: 03 p.m. John K. Anderson JULIUS A. COLLER, II JULIUS A.COLLER ATTORNEY AT LAW 1859-1940 612-445-1244 2 1 1 WEST FIRST AVENUE SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 553Z9 July 9, 1986 The Honorable Eldon Reinke, Mayor of the City of Shakopee Members of the Shakopee City Council John K. Anderson, City Adminstrator Dear Co-Workers: Enclosed is a brief synopsis of time spent by me as City Attorney and on what the time was spent from January 1 through the end of June, 1986. The enclosed schedule is not completely accurate in that it does not reflect time spent on drafting and drawing Ordinances, conferences with City employees and matters of that nature. If you have any questions I will be glad to hear from you and in the meantime I thank all of you for your splendid cooperation. Very truly yours, Jul s A. Coller, II Shakopee City Attorney JAC/nh 171" � r �{ £ -O N N c W N \/ W F E i 03 NJAN) ol CO.) N ; N (r C X" 4 1 I c i oo y N 'tll Oo Ca i f f 1 ® W i i4` "40 �.� s• F N _ _ C• �O N U+ N N -• \) ` -O N c - O C.� O• •C I V O co-, N 8-, t!J O G D• •O 0- :r N r EL n) i I t N Cb j A ^/ N Cn 0-0 - f (� 1 CO t - � ' � � � ��!• � � \ i To is i o CT 1%0 N C� o� ID OD j t 444 1 � I 1 i c c I N a C A v C O _ N Nj ■ V �� v O G O140 N N cJ 1., IoN N �co `°.o --j CD �. x Co U Cp i P O m � D -O v , n -� r o V OD vt V 3 � a T a (7 � N N OD ,4L hL . . , C7 0 E; Z) C) 5' (D -< -0 ID 0 c 0- k 12 NO LA ID 11*0 44h, ...................... .......... Lyl OD N � JOCap� O x N N G N \) O W A 1 O W Ln U A 4 N rD N N Q a D Ul ND IQ N -+ CT �O N Cn O G rD O O i Flo a O O Intl Z D �" D `D a OD V Q11- c 1 140 N Ul Oo O C� tT bO i 0 0 N 40 Ln OD o w n CJ N ^ C. 0� `0 } 3 0 , G CIO Ul ly w oo o 1 0 T�cl-b Q o (T c ' o L N � � 1 Gl O Q O N n (> 1410 N V r l • Ste= 4 44 V (E � ti- '' O C � MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in regular session on June 2, 1986 at 4:30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room. Commissioner Cook offered a prayer for divine guidance in the deliberations of the Commission. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Cook, Kirchmeier and Kephart. Also Liaison Wampach, Manager Van Hout and Secretary Menden. Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Kephart that the minutes of the May 5, 1986 regular meeting be approved as kept. Motion carried. Ken Adolf, from Schoell and Madson was present to update the Commission on the progress of the tank painting. Mr. Adolf presented a pay request #3 to the Commission from T.M.I. Inc. for painting of the steel water standpipe dated May 30, 1986. Pay request is for all work done except the exterior finish coat and tank disinfection. Motion by Kephart, seconded by Kirchmeier to approve pay request #3 to T.M.I, Inc. in the amount of $42,398.50. Motion carried. Manager Van Hout presented a bill from Schoell and Madson, Inc. for engineering services for the standpipe water tank in the amount of $731.76 for approval. Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Kephart to approve payment to Schoell and Madson Inc. in the amount of $731.76. Motion carried. Mr. Adolf presented a bill from E.H. Renner, Inc. for water supply well #7 dated May 30, 1986 for pay request #2. Progress on the well was updated. Motion by Kephart, seconded by Kirchmeier to approve pay request #2 to E.H. Renner, Inc. in the amount of $34,346.29 for water supply well #7. Motion carried. Manager Van Hout presented a bill to the Commission from A.C.G, Inc. for pay request #1 dated May 30, 1986 for watermain installed from the pumphouse to water supply Well #7. Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Kephart to approve payment to A.C.G. , Inc. for pay request #1 in the amount of $20,729.00 for installation of watermain. Motion carried. An engineering and inspection bill from Schoell and Madson for water supply well #7 was presented. Motion by Kephart, seconded by Kirchmeier to approve payment to Schoell and Madson Inc. for engineering and inspections for water supply well #7 in the amount of $5,816.37. Motion carried. Manager Van Hout presented a bill from the State of Minnesota for his engineer's license renewal for a two year term. Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Kephart to approve payment to the State of Minnesota for a professional engineers license for Manager Van Hout in the amount of $44.00 for a two year term. Motion carried. A bill from E.H. Renner and Sons, Inc. for Phase two expenditures for the re- habilitation of Well #3 was presented. Various charges on the bill were discussed. Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Kephart to approve payment to E.H. Renner, Inc. in the amount of $8,308.75 for work done on well #3. Motion carried. A bill from Schoell and Madson, Inc. for engineering and surveying services for the 2nd feed from Blue Lake substation was presented. Motion by Kephart, seconded by Kirchmeier to approve payment to Schoell and Madson, Inc. in the amount of $245.30 for engineering services. Motion carried. Manager Van Hout presented a summary of water rates from various cities and a comparison of the revenues that would result if those rates had been implemented in 1985. A discussion was held on improving the rusty water problems that occur occasionally in the City of Shakopee. Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Kephart that the Utilities Manager investigate the procedures necessary to improve the brown water problem and report to the Commission his findings. Motion carried. The Eagle Creek Junction plat was discussed. It was the understanding to the Commission that this area was platted for single family dwellings while in fact it is for multiple dwelling. The problem with looping the area was discussed. Manager Van Hout will study the looping problem and will bring recommendations back to the Commission. A communication dated May 19, 1986 from Jac Coller, City Attorney, regarding the background and the suggested solution to resolve the issue of the appointment dates and the terms of office of the Utilities Commissioners was discussed. The Commissioners were in agreement with the solution contained in Mr. Coller's letter of having the appointment date scheduled as City Council preferred while continuing the April 1 starting date for a Conmissioner' term of office. BILLS READ: Bill Boyer Ford 10,714.00 Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association 340.00 City of Shakopee 20,032.00 Auto Central Supply, Inc. 47.10 Autocon Industries, Inc. 697.57 Battery and Tire Warehouse, Inc. 41.27 Border States electric Supply Co. 322.85 Burmeister Electric Co. 3,268.80 C & H Carpenter Lumber 48.15 Carlson Hardware Co. 36.88 City of Shakopee 651.46 City of Shakopee 17.16 Clay's Printing Service 107.95 Cy's Amoco Service 17.00 Davies Water Equipment Co. 1,333.91 Dicks Conoco 28.00 Ditch Witch of Minnesota, Inc. 34.70 Dunnings Hardware 4.50 Electronic Center, Inc. 63.73 Excel Office Products, Inc. 26.50 Feed Rite Controls, Inc. 467.13 Glenwood Inglewood 17.18 W.W.Goetsch Associates, Inc. 56.24 Graybar Electric 663.72 H & C Electric Supply 357.80 Hennens ICO 15.00 Henningson, Durham and Richardson 1,699.12 Joplin Printing Co. 15.83 Lathrop Paint Supply Co. 14.25 Leef Bros. , Inc. 20.00 Malkerson Motors Inc. 3.20 Metro Sales Inc. 153.25 Minnesota Valley Testing Laboratories Inc. 40.80 Munitech, Inc. 120.00 Northern States Power Co. 1,199.17 Northern States Power Co. 980.96 Northern States Power Co. 245,051.33 Northern States Power Co. 332.32 Pitney Bowes 361.50 Reynolds Welding Supply Co. 3.35 Terry Roquette 24.51 Scott Builders, Scotland, Inc. 110.00 Scott Carver Economic Council 369.08 Shakopee Ford 98.77 Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 152.19 Shakopee Services 22.00 Siemens-Allis Power Components Division 17,411.00 Southwest Suburban Publishing, Inc. 279.55 Starks Cleaning Services 53.40 Suel Business Equipment 85.80 Total Tool, Inc. 219.63 Transport Clearings/Century Motor Freight 45.36 United Compucred Collections, Inc. 79.20 Valley Industrial Propane 10.88 Water Products Co. 1,572.20 Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. 2,328.71 Ziegler Tire Service Co. 170.70 Lou Van Hout 48.39 Ted Neisen 317.00 Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Kephart that the bills be allowed and ordered paid. Motion carried. Liaison Wampach gave his report. The recommendations of the Commission regarding the terms of office will be conveyed to the Council by Liaison Wampach. Manager Van Hout reported to the Commission that the Downtown Lighting Committee and their consulting Engineers and himself will be going out to view different areas for lighting. j '-7 Liaison Wampach will convey to the Council that the Commission would suggest a joint meeting be scheduled for June 30, 1986. at 7:00 P.M. Manager Van Hout presented a bill from Kirkwold construction Co. for oversizing of watermain on 11th Ave. and Co. Rd 17. Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Kephart to approve the bill from Kirkwold Construction Co. for the amount of $4,890.90 pending review of the costs by our Engineers. Motion carried. There were no new plats for May, 1986. Three fire calls were reported for May, 1986 for a total man hours of 7 hours and 55 minutes. There were no lost time accidents for May, 1986. The next regular meeting of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission will be held on June 30, 1986 at 4:30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room. Motion by Kephart, seconded by Kirchmeier that the meeting be adjourned. Motion carried. S r Barbara Menden, Commission /Secretary MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administer FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer � SUBJECT: Project Status Report DATE: July 10, 1986 Attached is a project status report for the month of June, 1986. Also attached is a memo from the project inspector for the Holmes Street Storm Sewer Lateral Project addressing an increase in use of insulation from what was expected due to unforeseen conditions (watermain depth) . As we get further into the project and can estimate the quantities better, a change order will be forth coming to address this quantity change. KA/pmp STATUS -istwlivimbA %�*iO rioa-isboA .?i +-;Iot :O'T OM3M. *v~igr,!3 Yllo o3157fMaA mem I M(.39,:i *,ioq%P *09LO"q :TOMG- U8 :3TAC .abet 'SMOG 'to dtfloto grit '101 I-loqO-1 410*6*8 e ba 122 I to earoloH aril -icolt ;t3s(,:),,iq *(it mo-it berfO&JIS 'NI M& g"fazolbbe 13"Lo-lG 16,161ai 'Vewsla M-10$e too--(,tE! ar—ic *forfoo 11-Zyg�-o'lolt(vu of sub befosoxe amw Jariw •o-it rio.t *zloinni 'io seg! N&3 bmz l3eCoiq *0* olml -foillt-wi ;t 9 0 Sw (MIQ9b Nisavivt&w) ad I f LW -fwb-ire oqrvram�� rb --rat J*d ooifi *msjjp aril storm *as qraq\A,4 eUTATE / L MEMO TO: Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer FROM: John DeLacey, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Holmes Street Basin Laterals v' Construction Project DATE: July 1, 1986 In accordance with SPUC requirements we are instructing the contractor to insulate all water line crossings that have less than three feet of cover between the storm sewer and water line. It appears that there is going to be many more crossings re- quiring insulation than originally anticipated due to our finding the existing waterlines have considerably less than the 7. 5' depth normally expected. At the present time it is not possible to determine how much of an overrun in the project quantity for insulation this will create~ As the project further develops we should be able to determine the excess and proceed with a change order request. JD/pmp HOLMES uny"q9MV"T pywajsc "Mot :Mops'� e16"ejej "Mul "Fiqla aqw10H MMW MCI t \ IuL QTAa qdt Its tJOLVIani anz 0" _VnuMsnWpsV JUM df1w somsh"Onss A COST u4no Udl ap"Icrwn evil noMw Ifs 9*010api at notowlawa M"i! "etbw tatters 19907 Myote ado Ynewl9d onyon to IS ge"M* Mumt -S" agNiaaons "10m Y"aw 9d of gniou e: 0190* tsm! a0beqas 11 qwo o! wb beJaqrnilas yflanigzio szM* moilsioamx gmi,sup 17A Sol net : weal y1dowbip"oo sv6e e%oxImelsw 2MJ: *sxxs qm* yllsmson dfaab Ms"M wo" 901monlet ot eldive0q 100 1 , 1 , emit spsas"q not 1A liiw airl por :bIM001 "M Yfifmaup lus(, yq Ott si Nplyqvo w K) sd " Ors Sw eq0f9Vsb 1001001 1`0SLOW 4 01 ZA .,login oobaw beawaqq b.6 se.Qxs 9t 1 worw"STSM �Ma\G-L ?3MJ0H - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIX n I ~ I M yY M N • M M M M VY M M amp --1 M M meI I I � I � { - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - cm — — — — — — — ! - _ _ _ _ _ { 1 i i � I i ! _ i I ,Il 1 { I { I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ rl fW Npp W D Gf _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ M - - _ - - N - - _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - te r N N — — — — — — — —— — _ _ m _ _ — _ tO _ _ _ _ f { to ` ro I I I I ! I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I I I I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � I - - - - - - - - _ ; fie - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O r. r NI a ' C3 Z v v o 9W 9 • r " r r � � r r �$$ r r � r r � r m r r r .- � rnn r rg b J dS 1 U T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l l l f l l l l i I �$ Iii I I � I � I I � f f I � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ n Z - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l l i froi f i ISI I � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ { { { I ISI I � IruI � ' � — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - mT pTp Nmm m` m� m� m mti WW U _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ K - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V m - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I { _ _ � O I I i l l l I I 1 I { I f l I I I f 1 I I f _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I f f DI I f ! 191af � { I { { f tx —M wl %�IITIR Small cities Ralph Pribble 17 'Prosecuting misdemeanors in townships: Who really pays? Thanks to a new law, Chapter 440, themselves, the same as cities. Now, ships have been successful in continu- townships are no longer responsible for however, the law is clear. ing to increase their authority, such as prosecuting misdemeanors and petty As of March 1984, Minnesota had with urban town powers, while ducking misdemeanors that occur within their over 200 urban towns. Any township responsibilities that other governmen- jurisdictions. Instead, the county attor- with a population of 1,000 or more can tal units have to assume," said LMC ney will prosecute, at no cost to the choose to become an urban town by Legislative Counsel Joel Jamnik. townships. It'll mean a considerable majority vote at the annual township Jamnik cites it as another example of savings to them. meeting. These urban towns, some of cities being forced to subsidize the Cities, though, are not so lucky. them with populations over 5,000, can activities of townships. "Who pays for Both cities and townships still have to exercise most of the powers of cities, it? The county," he continued. "And prosecute violations of their local ordi- yet don't have to worry about prose- who pays county taxes? The cities, as nances or regulations themselves. But cuting traffic violations and DWIs (the well as the townships." With state where the act exempts townships, it bulk of misdemeanor violations) which demographer statistics showing that leaves cities with the same responsibil- occur within their borders. city residents outnumber township res- ities and expenses for misdemeanor Yet, the more than 500 Minnesota idents, obviously cities are footing the prosecutions that they've always had. cities with populations under 1,000 still bill for townships. Counties had been doing such pros- have to contract with the county attor- League lobbyists had tried to show ecutions for the townships until an ney or have the city attorney do these the Legislature that the measure was attorney general's opinion last year prosecutions. A question seems discriminatory. It's unfair to all cities, interpreted Minnesota Statutes 487.25 obvious: Is this fair? but especially to smaller ones. Jamnik to require that townships handle it "It's a prime example of how town- suggests that cities, rankling under the fact that townships can dodge this financial obligation even when they're - much bigger than a lot of cities, let their legislators know of the law's discriminatory impact. ■ L-Z —THE SIGN OF QUALITY- SINCE 1952 AN UNBEATABLE NLC plots strategy in C O M B I N A T I O N Milwaukee OAF How do you make the most of your • , F/� `• kR01M 'FT council's time and resources, create and maintain good relationships with citizens and the media, and ensure that your city is making the right moves for the future? For some answers to these ques- tions, attend the National League of *--- Cities' sixth annual Council Staff Con- ference in Milwaukee, July 31-Aug. 2. _ The topic is "Council Strategies in a Complex Age." Sessions include effec- tive media relations, making your city DISTRIBUTORS OF THE COMPLETE LINE OF READING BODIES, more customer-oriented, strategic SPACE CAPS,TOOL BOXES,PICK-UP POUCHES AND ACCESSORIES- planning, and how current federal leg- islation will affect your city. Housing LZ COMPANY, INC. registration closes July 9th. For more information on the conference, call 1881 RICE STREET•ST.PAUL,MINNESOTA 55113•PHONE(612(488-2571 NLC at (202) 626-3115. LMZ MN WATS 1-800-247-1082 22 Minnesota Cities Test your knowledge Some cities are not WHO CAN YOU separate governing bodies DEPEND ON FOR from the townships in which they're located. How HARDWARE, is local government different for these cities? SOFTWARE, Find out next month when Minnesota Cities will answer INSTALLATION,this question and ask another. Or, you can answer the question yourself if you have a copy of the fourth edition of the Handbook for Minnesota Cities. The answer is on page TRAINING,17. The Handbook is an invaluable aid to cities and is available to League members for$30. Last month's question: Which is the correct method SERVICE, for amending an ordinance? a) Replacing it with another ordinance, or b) amending it by resolution. Answer: If the proposed change is to a short ordinance SUPPORT AND or if the changes are numerous, the usual and desirable practice is repass the entire ordinance in its amended COMPLETE form, repealing the old ordinance in a separate section of the new one. An optional form would be to entitle the new ordinance as an amendment and then restate the entire SATISFACTION? ordinance as it should be read after amendment. (Handbook for Minnesota Cities:, p. 114.) �p "The Tank With The Red Roof" Over 65 Years Serving Municipalities WATERTOWER PAINT AND REPAIR CO., INC. COMPUTER CONCEPTS Dial 357-2101 or 357-2102, Area Code 515 & SERVICES, INC. Box 67 That's right. CCSI can handle all your Clear Lake, Iowa automation needs under one roof, which 50428 makes your job a lot easier. . . Or, call Larry Hartwell one call does it all! (612) 859.2113 Repairing — Sandblasting — Roofs TOLL FREE 1-800-892-2383 7227 Third Street South, St. Cloud,MN 56301•612-253-2170 Painting — Maintenance Contracts — Jackets 1450 Energy Park Drive, St.Paul,MN 55108 @ 612-221-0239 Interior Inspection by Color Video TV Available Available exclusively for IBM Systems Member of American Water Works Association July 1986 21 -7 v 7-7 Z i7 5 P v 1 erit rtia, e 4- v 'S e r:e r a 1137 7 31 7- i t v C,f Sh ak cl 0 e e- v !a. 5:D, Racet-rack Tax Increment 1 J7-31' 556-i cit-V of sm-IL".omee Racetrack borid, issue City clO:' Si-ia:tcmeeE, ;D,Dt Z;lamnir.m Dist-rict- r:Z M '"C' SI-1;4 1 j. 1 7,'- C:7�V f I -.L c o t I e.n al I =I T; T Z, R'--)01 3 7-7 E R-I =i v ^-R cr e a :-ari4--r;-,ury coi-s P-ncs, "ND Siri A 113 7 3 1 B 4-I Ci c Inc:e., n for rd. -zt f S C, e r'2.r: ,C,r _7 C::Ltv C.-;: S-lsv.o=;ee =M 1 -731ES-i $1E5. 0.0 1 p -7 -:soljte c-sver m4-es SHAI13731ED-1 City of 5171 Mer -chant-s --Ranova- - on SHi 7 3.1 7 p CI, .I -C Ri.,catraci4. `ax S i--i;:l 17-„S r7.q v = F E;l ==c E- Z,0 z1ov C, boa :Zee :WL to- K ;Z9 East 10L Avenue smaKomea, Yn EZ27:3 p p V Awount NUMmer Zlient Naw m..an wi-s RE Line SHA5127311S-1 CitV of Shakoaee S242. 00 Wangerin (Bill to K warm 710 SHA51373134-1 City of ShaKonee Fire Truck Mr omlem SAPM273144-1 City of Snakomee *43. W'' Zhard Si. A51373153-1 City of Shakomee Hardrives Suit SHAS13730il-I City of shanomee Prosecutions TOTAL $4. 311. 50, ly [ 7'���D | � _27 Eout Iri a !-�a� l Hoe� Shaxooee. �N �5379 Citv of S-lak.00ee E?ILLING DAT:-:7 2�-�� 129 E. First Ave' Shakooee` MW 55379 5 LIMIMIARY Account Number CIient Name Balonce RE Line . BHA 11373002-1 City of Shap.00ee 100. 00 General SHA11373157-1 City of Shakooee-Dev $12. 50 Racetrack Tax Increment District SHA11373158-1 City 'of Shakooee !�31. 00 Racetrack bond issue SHA113731G3-1 City of Shakooee $108' 50 Planninn District for Race Track SHA11373179-1 CIty of Shakooee 0. 00 Scottiand IDB' s (BILL TO APPLICANT) SHA11373184-1 City of Shaxomee S71. 50 conoemn for rd to PH Acidn (PILL APP) SHA11-3731EG-1 City of Shakooee 183. 50 Silver-hawk Assessment AooeaI SHA11373188-1 City of Shak.00ee $103. 00 NSP Disoute over, ooIes SHA11373189-1 City of Shakooee $i39. 50 Merchants Hotel Renovation SHA137_-:'157A-1 City of Shakooee $50. 00 Racetrack Tax Increment-Condemnatio SHA1373177A-1 City of Bmakooee S2` 422. 40 Scott Cty' Lumner SHA51373118-1 Citv of Snakooee $4E4. 50 Wancerin (Dill to K ty,'ar� TZD) SHA5137_3134-1 City of S�-iako:)ee . 00 Fire Tru�� oro�Iem oarst Ave. SL, ,Yi !vPRY shavowee, TN T5379 kcC5Un7 -Unnor 111sm Nam. RE Line SHA51373144-1 City of shavooee Chart SHA51373153-1 City of Shakopee sl, 050. 50 Hardrives Suit City of smakomee 11 . 262. 50 Prosecutions T07AL SE. B05. WO - KRASS & MONROE CHARTERED 327 South Marschall Road Shakooee, MN 55379 ' City of Shakopee BILLING DATE 06-25-86 129 East 1st Avenue Shakooee, Mn 55379 SUMMARY Account Number Client Name ' Balance RE Line 006. SHA11373002-1 City of Shakooee $52 General $12 50 SHA11373157-1 City of Shakooee-Dev ~ Racetrack Tax Increment District 0� SHA11373158-1 City of Shakooee $0. 00 Racetrack bond issue SHA11373161-1 City of Shakooee $1, 261. 00 Shakooee Recreation TIF 501�. SHA11373163-1 City of Shakooee $ Planning District for Race Track 50130. SHA11373184-1 City of Shakooee $ condemn for rd to PH Addn (BILL APP) 00 SHA11373186-1 City of Shakooee $25. 00 Silverhawk Assessment Apoeal 00 SHA11373188-1 City of Shakooee $25. 00 NSP Dispute over ooles 50 SHA11373189-1 City of Shakooee $15. 51-71 Merchants Hotel Renovation 00 SHA1373157A-1 City of Shakooee $0. 00 Racetrack Tax Increment-Condemnatio 4577. SHA1373177A-1 City of Shakooee $9 Scott Cty. Lumber �01. SHA51373002-1 City of Shakooee $34 General 72�. 00 SHA51373118-1 City of Shakooee 11, 723. 00 Wangerin (Bil ! to K Mart TID) City of Snakooee BILLING DATE 06-25-W 129 East 1st Avenue SUMn1ARY Shakooee, Mn 55379 Account Number Client Name Balance RE Line SHA51373144-1 City of Shakooee $933. 90 Chard SHA51373153-1 City of Shakooee $1, 292. 01Z, Hardrives Suit ^ ' SHA81373011-1 City of Shakopee $1, 255. 50 Prosecutions TOTAL $8. 535. 85 | � ' Memo To: John K. Anderson, City Adminstrator From: Gregg M. Voxland, Finance Director Re: Capital Improvement Fund Balance Date: July 11, 1986 Introduction & Background You requested information on the history of the C.I.F. fund balance as shown below. 1984 Transfer from P.I.R. Fund to new C.I.F. $479,465 1984 Revenues 46,490 1984 Expenditures JEJ Drainage (60,088), 101 Svs Rd (20,970) (87,650) and Wienandt Underground (6,592) Transfer to cover 101 Service Road Costs (33,180) Fund Balance 12/31/84 405,125 1985 Revenues 47,479 1985 Expenditures JEJ Drainage (99) " Taylor St & Sidewalk Program (9,107) Transfer to Special Assessments - old projects costs * (26,876) Transfer in from closed debt service funds 8,796 Fund Balance 12/31/85 425,318 1986 Revenue Budgeted 45,700 Transfer in - Special Assessment 196,152 1986 Expenditure - Budget - City Hall (400,000) Estimated Fund Balance 12/31/86 JIL7. 170 *Recommended by Staff & Auditor Without checking, I believe all projects and transfers shown above had prior Council approval for C.I.F. funding. Cn LA LW WW WW WW W • (N LN(A WW W W WwW * rN LA La WwtNW WtNwww WtNWW • CA (.4 w (,,L4 'n r U:C I U i�L V�U' V,U)Ln • t N t.. W W t N I^ W w W W • —1-w r r r r r r r r r r r r r • O = R :.a[a n V- IL rrr-+rrU 000 4 0 $W;.m(A NN NNN • C, 00 WW W W WW W rrrNro • W W +h Nr r7z W C•+ LN N r OLDm JCS 4 r0-4 01.N .0w NNO * r0O to VIP UI PW NLP,.R WNr%0 it Nr M Nr OO C T� V)Y -0mmrac +'+ a r)3n to Tr0 r x0xtnm LI) X: 3'9 x'Cn zmr-1 ►�r D N r i z Z O D Z 0 0 0►+1 0 0 0 0 1 O—-1 r m rl m r C 0.,"m w z 0 m-0 D ►+m Z O rD rNDG')G')O3r -i GSC mCDrrmna n Vi G) V) PO m C r r)c )-+ GC: ZrlOn M i. m x V)z -4w m z. ., • .,r m z z r, rr.r rl Y-1 m n m m n m r x x r r a 0 Z c In n a n ri n• y < 7(n N zzzrl z P,-.4 rrm nn Orr: z • r • m.-Iz ). m0 z co G A V) a O c 1 a00 mmm. < c) 0 <rn mm -r 0 " -1.0 'D z1-4 -+-arn r rr mc. o ^. T x Z x m c (o T G n o S rrl 0 G) m ^ In m .+ r f.+-"Z Y "Pl " 'n r 'd r r'. V, f' T T r F; r >x r1--)a C -1 7D x m x -4 0 a o z V) O m c o n m r)o o rD H n r z p C n mN0zno.:zzr-i m mcc -nDz rnIcX- Itxa rr) C. rl•-+a a a s .. -C zr N moo-17rmzca .�) nsm• as -Iz p° 1 0 . m rarr-0 '9m > zn2 fn rn Vf ."'7� x z n G: I'1-1 $ --1 O m z x .-+ -) -+ G r) c -i -ti m m r Stn Ill n V, .-) to ) 1> D 1 C v) n T — m n N D Z ^) a U) 'D C C/; T .-� b m in 'D � Z r "Q )n Z 2 r z i�� n -� r 7C c 3 rl m r.N CJ G X m.. .^ r rl V) r)2 rl .'a m x n r Lo w►+ In -a N -a n ►'^ o a n mmm0m ") zZD 0 z • z0 ;u zrHnm .-i m V7 to m V) •+c o Tl -0rl z �z z z r. m ten ., n a z e M *+r-i -)mzz cnm z z x �� > c ri p r .. -0 rr .r00Z. r.00 I'1 m n V)Z •c-+ GR r r rtH X .y Wri Nz r:ri O 0 m n-nm C1 D N n 0z0x NN,,,,{ z u) m m to ri c - - : z p tom ti to y D V) I i m m 111 m I Ic m I { ! I I 1 1 o I j j i C i W A o m i f r r N I m rw z Ln- N O N : N -+N UI �D r • • m • + r • • .. • i j • o•.DI $ aD !n 1 r $ $ N •+NN or N N-• m U)r$ %D-i 4C N:. 1"4, 1 1- $ N IN N y r .O r N co$ I W a) `D •D rl y D< G O W N U)Ul F• $ CO N O u)m $Ul T$a% ' Co W N v y•a n C 0O rrO OO�'G oo W' .-`- Or Orn 0C7OW C� O O O C)U 0O %AO UIOOOQO -+; O O 0 W W V c 'po UlC)W OCD 000 D, O O OO G O O O GOO= 00 O 0O o CD r_- 0 Wr X. z. I i 1 z m JJ L j i I � cx z b + M � m l ¢ ' ! z I I ni o m1 z I I � Ill , i m41, cND i F+ON� .R vi� hO- •LN -� i aO N y • vt eN 1a v+N o vl vl•D •+. A O•F• yr a o o r r.l u ca o N l b W o! • + • . r . . • • .• + • + r • • • + . • . .o G To *GD • O OO OOOO ON O OOr$Aj 00com /+N�D N OO W OOUi it VNa00 l p o0 rmn i ! t:, 0 O G 6 o 0 Q.0 $ '. p t:+O U�`D G:+ O O UI C.J O G O 0 CJ O O O O Vl O Gi O p; CD O o o o G o C n ' O o O l b a o C', C0 0 O CD O o O o 0, ! (n o v l C ' • • • • • • • 0 W• • • ► • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • s • • • • • • • m p o 0 o C a o 0 0 0 v O o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C O co Z 10000 0000 Ob O I= 00 O O i 0 O 0000 0000000 00000 O O .'7. O O m N W W p N r 0 •'+-4 LQ • r • • • . r r a it r rfnNO �D UIPm� ) -+ HV V n L:W 0Tr 41 b NNma N ►'• i �I I r N rorvUlroo0 N 0%co tON� C' WJ- 0 r $Lw 0 0,wNNOo $ 0+ ! ! I o mN n i rpm Co Ln O,6 O W� Ni '. i Ul b W %DOOTo$ mT • • i • • s • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • Y • • • • c O O V a.A b 0 0 N O o 0 0 Io I. 0 0",jv O O Ir O a O N W 0 O O U a 0 0 r o O O N o tv i7O N0%A Ino C0 O 000000 O o OO N 0000000 W O%U1000 0 d 0 0 C- N "' r0 P ' a 1 ! W -1 O 1 1 j J i to A I r A N ON V - CII ! A Co t0 O ! 1 lLn N1 ro r �D a7 m CD o: P $ oOW N i r LA 'A.O U1 Oi 0I 001+$ V 000$ T � ' mCD N Tm$ tT TNF+N N'I b N� tTM0NV/LOOT O : COOUTA CD (D Or $ V+O•D•D -4 40 W OO�M" A i� N QUO+ %D Wm COO W OO' r 0 C V OO O0 %D OV 000 ? OOm M O 1 OO-i moi. .a N •'� -� � • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • t . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • s • • • • • • • a �?G n O�)Om O OO m : OOOG VIOO O OV N OO NO Oe LA(I op Co O(1)OOO•D ; O D O .1 ID-J z 0 0 DD O Vl O O 0 0 0 O - 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 �o 00 O O 0 0 O W m CT O O o 0 O O C. O G V (nTl n'1 l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 it i t 1 1 :1 1 I A 1 1 m FAN r v rrNrr r l rUlOb7)J W r O Vt V 00$ A•D 0FOP r OFN 'G rw V FT+ $�1 r o0 WOONC�+W (1l J. W • • • 0C,•ro • s • r ' • • • • • • • • • • • • • i * W W • W W W W W 4 W ■ W W Ln GI W W W(A W W W L+l W W w W W T r • %. _W • w co DD Ln Iz- rt Cry M C'•V Ln U'. L;,N V-L l:i U'. Ln V I lP L• Lr L- L� r C • "'•o • wWN Nom+ I• O� • Ln p AF -0 W LW w. N NNNN NN r Cbz a • CO • oON r0 • G • o W NP'- OLD L-4 r;r- .1 0"4- W N -•o y nu C, -i N 1 2 S y l-f f7 !7 m m N ). N C T'D 3 f7'it 0 S IG ;D C r) z vz r MZ o o x M.. c0m P" � c ►.-4"mczrn ro r, D Ca N NDzz-i C C x C0 zor mol -ir -� z n n n-i -1 -Lm .M. :J X; c 3)-•I(n f*IMZ fel-rMocr- c a \ K ✓; 4: U I i l r; x x, -1 -f G: U, • Z C.. A G' • M z M • T flT r r ►y M m m •-I rn2 n wo.iTL' omz MGA O M O M r r sr, C &I, T T N z z ... V, y T-0 N m C m m Ln m T x z D DCC -I r OG 0 -ir r M0 .4 = ::t, • -4C20 r)z T (n -i rn z z A-i z z -rl r.C 2 ►•I r r1ll r C;D r,IL -i G C- x m V C �7 m r•In hr m M O V)rrtiAQ cA En 2 'L7x N;o -c -nrlA S �' •'+ O 62c to Ln -D m 1 T.m n V, (:, aEn 27: %. r" O G C C Y t C. C/) -0 m 7- Qc m r I,' - L:0 r- M -i r X C Ln to x U) N V) C U, u-r ' h Cn N .+ 0 D0700 en 0 LO fl'IAx GT 1 Q c Ste`, •D ID.;z ;Q r- cat 2 f D z T ► PI G Z Irl c - A-i p r M fm(I O 00" r m r) m PI r L) r'' - c r•I Ln rn C I m r) • • • + +I m x 1 •I + N i -4 _ K m C, N W ! U. �0 T A S• C� 6) r ? M i I CN [T C� CA F W-0 M F "� Lh W N Ln D z co 0 O V \ N O P O V • A O C 9 C • • • • • • • • • • • s • Y • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • -i -1 W O O O W m C O O r '+ In 1 P O O G F T U M O o 0 V V N 9 G 0 0 0 O O 0 0 r O w C O O LD O i 1 t I 1 I 1 1 1 r a z a c r ! I z M D m W N f c. Nw F r� m1 w o V N a r A r w N ! � Ln : v, r Ln 4 I N V W A (n 0 : UI O O i O In �0 ! V N)0 0 0 w Ln N O O N .� t ( N Ci w G O O O G G b LC OLnO GOO D G OOOO O O r1l 1 O O O O O O O O O O G O O O O O O • • • • • i • -• • • • • • • • i • • • • 1 • • • • • • • • • 1Y1 O O O O b O G O 0 0 O O O O O O G O O O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 $ C3 0 o b o o o b b o i o 0 o o o O b o o o b o o o o o 0 0 i y o o ►. r I I N N m I + + �► • • • • • + I • + .D 'D UI W I W N LA N LD%D+ C D W 0� N Cil f r a P = Q+ LD Dt N CJI O -1 N w L8 m O -+ r O QL r W D N i N O o F -0 C, W j W O J to P N M o W �. r Qa W V n C2 0 F .l C o o C% `+ r LD W O O V1 O N N 0 0 r O N O O is N b C T W LD CG OF �+ r O -000000000 rc wr bO AO D LA I • N CJf r W N ►+ 'i O J. + I + • • I W R Cn N W .� i V,N Ln N + + N m 00+ QL 1 + + • • + r I N r N T �D�D 01 CD ul V[n .+ D CD f N NO W O -0�D F J. b U1 NLP PrP r CD Cu NO QT ►- WNO x N to O O CT D� %D Ln b N W LD N O II O o r Co w v o • • • • • • • • • • • ► s • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • D [n O o 0 (r, N o O O W rD en N T O O w O w Ln n 0 rn O N O O N N CD Z N o c Q �' '-' -J ooQ` ID 10 o o+ oo 0000vi.4 spa n a m C, LW r W N CDN Ln i m L W i n cn F W C j CO r W a - Ln N • 0` r r v O LD r O Ot O L; F (r m Ir, cn i iv o o .. a oo D i -i N v -0 rt r • r • r r R F r i-r r -0 4- &1 r -0 -0r -0 .P 4 r4' F -0r-0 rt rr A041-0 -0r r �7 •"' �t7 rt �:: • rt Uh U: R 0 r w W W U Nv L. v. W W W W W W N N N N N N IV N rt -r r r -r r r •p R W R r I• rr R Apr v0 Q %DS N 0, U1 W N N rr r ID.D 6-L4 W N 0 r-0'IA r O nz 9 ►+ R N rt o R �Or rt wo- vlr Q 0O00 Li p.Or NrNON v,O • Nr O W SOON O n0 C, + G r) z N -.4 n Cf) V 3n30nx Cti'D-r -+'D -v V. CmCDS V V 'O CIC =-0 'C '9V O V C n D m a m m a •17> C 1-I Cm CO r'I-4z x M0 :0m x z i0 OCC m z0 mmI'll ma Ca zCD 1"'1 Z 3 X ➢ 77 -0 Cryx % mZz ►+V1 " arV, I, c) C,CarC •.-ti ;a'V x malyz77-'rmr ri z x. r 'D r. ;on V-n -- rCz Crt :c )--i 3. r r' r' Cr Tb V, 37c r V Z. r. -I V, V; ➢ �+ ;u r Inrlx mN•'+a "•1 rl 'V G r m r • Tia z ➢ r 0 2 .Z7 r. ;v 01.400 I-4 n" z rmxo0 .4" " mo 0 c, ➢ m *I r .,r r. r -I� m 000 <sz -lmm a cz z mxm tnm -n I'll z z z 2 1 V a OL)z mhC) a z C) ➢ V Z.Inc V r ' 0 Pc00 V m0 01 Z n C7 m 'om zc- cn Nm m z 0 -1 -1+-+ ms 2 1 1 1 1 Xn1 V n m x A0 P. mV V) mm g- (A o zm- ara Vi m r3T Omri 4) V C 2b C23 -i➢ V 1 rl ZC ►+m,-. C C TlD ➢ z IT, c •- V C n -D Q C., r r I C', 'n O n -0 r r --4 r x D rTiL r1 (nn ; K C V, n 38217`- Z C .gy m•. r Drr •+ C z O S 2 .'CI S N y M T V'-1 D "'I M H n• n O -n M V mnl C D �'I U) rU) mm r•.x r 1- n O .. 1-r. -+ -+ -, 2 C m -In -i rlX zm Cr M 3 z z = 1' z m F-11 C -+ -I n C. x V)M cn c -1 'D Ct in V Z' V U) m -1 x x O m :0 rn m m oo xz 1 ►+ • n z • c� � arlr ) <n m to c� z 0 n m n V, En r- zm " m 9. w n 3. X. m cn O n W a i 2 • n z n n m m z v) a i y w o z n I I z x r In kD O W N UI 0% A J O) N N r a • • r r a r • • a • • • • r ♦ r • r • • m W �D NJ NNrUI � W �OJO �ON N a•1"'Nr )D UI N rl W 01-- 0, mror 'SUl -+ WNCD W V 0 Nm a• P az y w �p Ln UIr►+.D P0, 0 NO�JO N � PNy J-0 � W a+O+o TO W y n z • f • • • • • • Cc O r- o c n 0 • • f • • i •w• i • O• • • • • • & • • • Y • • • • C•8,D •O•G•r •O vc0 0N . JNi -i -• �. W O r O r CD O O W-1 C)4.1 X00 N 01-0r0 VI000Vt0 of N Vi OO W 00 w N W X, i i c x m j I i I i ! ➢ m i i I i o t r!v W TJ N -•• r 0 0,L+ N P N VI0 VilDr-0 Ui 'G i N r r UI U1 t0 �6 P N►''N a r ,• r r r r r •Orr r-0 • a� •W•IJ•N aD+ � •,• ArC ;o rJ•DJ • rUtYrr7 14 • V.c. • + .• • • D Ul O u N N wU7 UI 4: -,U ONwr -0 WOUIW •D O O%DJOC r LiN D'• G�.:-0J M. i C W W - G QO J w N 0 0 0 V r J O41 V I o N U I.V O G, c7 s I r N V I o '`! ;Q U I O O o o N I N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L n C U I 0 0 O O I,0 0 0 W -0 6 n i D C O O U 7 Ln • • • • • • • • • • i • • • f • • • ► • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 • • i i i • • • a O 00 O Ooaon00000Oppo GOOD GOOp a CD o 00000000 tr 1 � I p rn a m mr10 N Nw r w O t-0 N t-0r m a -0j -0 (ll u) OD r tQ�rrDNO�rPN i V1 ADW dmN If1 u7N Ul O•�D cnO W W GD 'D U1m N m InWFr O i rr JN O• 1. ni m WMmlb D -+ r W W 0 %DCIN r co 0t1-- 0O-0N0 I NN ONQ, CD v,4 w P'D00 a-4 V •..+ O i �D o o N N N -0 fn %D a�W MLINr00. J Lr-4 W J -P,L4 OA CO CD S OD n • • I • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • Y • • • • ♦ • f • • • • • • on ♦ • • • • • • -i O O tr) �0 1D o o �n oUl -+ oo06:Or N W NtDo Wo00WNra+ -+ o o GwJU1 -•NNJ C _ u N N C, W NCTIo WwU1J a ' a+ j a t r W W %A rNa` NN r N co W I N r W N al NATNv m of %D ro PV NmNOF0. r CD j �pAr O P0� W VJJO) 0+ v a+ a, %D �D N NOV -4.4 a(A Co CO-4C. 0 O roDOJ W m CHINO NNO W LM N N V mm%D VT or WWNW LN-4 w. 0 AN tT -0P J ^Mwm Go mo 7u W �D t0 N N V mOF GW mw WFNM -0mFw O CAN -0ro T -r lr cnLA6 rU10+ ►'• :n ID lb O O t o -0 m OO�D Q•OmwwtnJ T•tooJ oOO ..•-0m-0m �D OaO+JFC)�lJN Z c r 0 ooUl %DJJOWN a woGcOoNtTw0 •D -0 O G-0.? NNJUI W n a m J J O O VI I UI W W WNW W N NW A N TCD r-DW LA 'p. L. co (A ArAW -0 v -0 F O O r r P r m WT W J NUt CP tea) m C3WWJW N Co 0, co IT u:N Nm L L O K,r U5 N tC c.0 W J )v rQ n -� r J - w T ►+ * n z o0 • n o c� �+ O z m a) O C) N m ri n z T z Z m to C n ►r A _ •+ G + o T 'O rl n C r N i I + + r ! v W M V: J n z N W a rl CD 1 I � 1 ' � k i I CII M ! k f i I i f f • i ' �' { I i ! Z K j � i i � 1 i f i ( N� ►'' j tn N• I -40 I C T �O A j I ' k j i i I i I f I � ►+ , m j r m I W c _ n � N Ln r CJ T O n O n m rr '. m v o m D :y -I 2 -1 K H K -� z ~ a ➢ fes" r c ;D d n C, m o r (: O c a ori -+ r m c. �+ r a ra zm \ I �- (Tj H n A \ T i Z I i i w .c zkz r' r r'-. r r�.+' i�D ID IL �D 1- r'`-r r• r 0-1 IL ID �D .[)'.+ O� 0^ C� `y �[ ul j J a u:L^.vi (��'Ln U.ul j v8�D CD W W w W L4,W W %D 'D z 'S N N �D I•+ :Co W N:••+ 0, CD;C� UI F WW P", ,W N r.OD-.I Q`.Ut F W.N N W N r W N Tt�ai -n rl I( ;o -n, f �r�vc -� aA>csm -tim o n..rm := oz, Z X.Cn G x K n z 'S C A C TI n m z ytnml j m0mC) m'zOm: r'1m 2timnm I mZr+ 0 i I crl :z+� � cvlmocc� Wr- Co -lnz -ice+ j � nz .. na z 0-i rza' [n 4{ ! vzs ar -Ir. -cvZIra .Ior j v,r V-, �CCn--1 rI k a m m N H t a m CI r z z 3, � n � rz V) zs -c �vnliw QnV) o m', c n V,ri j zc{ i ti -I' z 1 no z I a -1 c o Na{ N n a rC C7 Im C 0 m o m F iz 3 m '.z z m:. 3 `D Z r rn co { n c) N im W n ' { r o:N W Liv y-. W-N F O G N.L N �w N'N un 1� .R.V �D N co :C z -1 G C.: Ln.C=O V N'..C� O f' P 0- 4' V r 0 OJ ti[1 V N V O W i :.� D K I• • :• s • • • • • •• • • • :• • • '• • • :• • • �♦ • • • • • ♦ �• • • • i• 'GIN r G N oOOI VV N Gjuo w.N O Ln�W W �D;oOU OO N;V OU Ln I •DNOOOUN oo'O `I k I( 1 7c m ioV) cv co 'Dl IC5 V1 'U D N t O '•+r IW W r CD �r m A T 1-•N NiV V co, LA I,W �D i�:W N F kN W.W O W Ln N.4 W j F+ D"V7 �r n 1 m -A'D OD U IC.: F+CA".N ON p-,,V r N PIW N N.�O N!O� co F'.N I (31.V F'�0 N F N`N I;o N 3 --F S. F'W V L1 C.(W d V.•D cc CD .D Q+(ri�� W�'N j V N��D W�D GD W �D N V :o O o� C ' W N O r.V V CID:C'N CO V`CD N O+Id Of+ C N C Cl V r M ID w V 4 2 0 Cl O Oj W,,o N ul`j+^ L. W:OP a% CP n LD 'D O11\) �L N'..W N L4 N) N 30.0 t , h• %U.W tT CD Q, W N NCO f 4 { n I W O W raN NG r o D Ui ✓tS F v.N W•-' w: L., 'v ... U, Ul D. P -! f'7 Q, O W N t NDD N N V! Ct V F �. • V N '.N 'V' •� � V-` Z.I- uCiOO W:1111 O OO O G O'O VIOOIV I F000G O.0 FO.t :C ;O(n C�• N.O G C:.I[:V G N N O N I W W F: W i0 0 O C1 6 6 O C) F 0 0 O O.O t (r O:W IN CD WI r.+': �.�!`i N•rV n+IW U 0 I. U,I: !h+ ' �1r),•D O�! OD f+N N,V v[r N N'Cs Ol W CJI'W UI N iN-•W u co o [n'f+ N J'N'D +I C�'_6 �'�O O :O O ooj d Ul.lo OD CT;W r r�m '.O O[r O:W r Uli�•d N:o1 �D F N m N [JI V m A, � ,+ N:W U-4 �a C• C' O.V W -+�.i �C V N V J: F D N Ut�4'i co CC .d F L[' CJ! N .0 W I O N N,�D •-i a In O O, -1('•'C�'��C ¢ �" "�:.r' .O Lr 10 N �^ r U' Ln'.Cc C, V.W �[W W'N S VI w N W:N NPO V N%L w P co:C` w Ln N.W .O N a cn m m r A v f•! F (.+P-1 NN F got U1. G._a u: OD OD U O W, N N:F N 41 �o CO W U .� C'I dory u mLN v: wm c (ll: V' i O` N r y.(JI W ul W: o UI'C VI O.C11 F CP :ul O m D' Vt- GJI O O f,:Ln'll C o o C:!O a o:D O o:0 00 n;0 b o o a 0:C) o O:o O a 0 0 L SIO n o a 0o O ;o C+ O' O r O C-:o n C; CO n!o O G cm C)a O.0 0 0,'0 CJ o 0 0 O O n O a;0 0 b O G V W J, a N F; F ;ul N� Ul N �F N N'11 W'UI O F' UI' CJI f+'N W F'W CJI .W V N • CT • 'n VLZ cl•. :, oUl �... u,x �O m.-•000 [,..D U •�+ c+Nr woou� r --I t 4 _ 0' N r W V z .� C T O r. l: C) C C O m - rn Ci c m z ^ p m o m o 0 c -fir �c y 3 -0m n 3 -1 ''D -� m fn -i X G •• n m 0 r r r r r r z rn 1- � y? t " a m m u r r m , n I •r ? 3r C , D N 1T1 z t !'Z 'D�C IS,CD W W:w w w�W w W .D Ic •D,ID z ID r r r-. r -+•+r r IICD►+t✓rr-. r,rrr+' N r .Dv .D m'mm W= .D �D Ifi �LiWJV -.4 �1 V .Iv L. N -�.m ID m:PN F,W NN • r N WNm.AWN'r m W W 1+m�W r Cy, Ut F L. Nr• J. m: O cC:z 2 a m f`I .y D ly H ! i Is0�.2CcC y2. 2 -{ x.• 67 Cly y'�a DOrC_Om x z.o-rzlcnoz' u = z,., ma mean, h -m, OzD:rnz f r a.N zr a n z o cn'-n ;0z'Dm ti a in r zm <'� �cO ., oaio i n YJ �-1 -rl Z; iZ �; fT n O'XJ D mm0 I� A O G z n z 1;u o a n n i r3i z z m m MI-4 m � azs� i z n n • mmm m M r"z y z -Z Vf 'z 2 r• -y m .� y Pit .0 'W D' VI N LN N) J 1 Or' i W `N W-Ur 'Nr►+•-• Fm ;p+ N OO I r-In j{ O r OI V :t 1-• F V O m, NDN I w m •,D Ln QUI F r ,m I-•O'N D� IF F F fr C, 9, rQ :C Z %D CD' NN P, O O Q+ N Q' f+ .O T m O r : �D F O N C,!O Ln .c .O F CD 0 O O ID N (D DD m 0''O ,O p � 4 in!0 UI O:O CO CD Ln 0 O (m Ln N N•r W CaV Ul O O N iF N OiF N1.1 O'I'D t hr• ! „V I �. iW N fViUl O L) u. Ln 4F NNI F 1-0. I W U1�0�F N WWF 'z r r:-+ ;tTt O :N F 1 f r mz V N AIO lW r!N .O 0 0.0'C� m iW r T-W Cl, LD it N i !r n 7 m-i U1 N Q NI%D +NI F;F W J i• O►+� OD:11 't. V N P �;W P r W F ;,)t;W o 'n O. li m .O r t;14;01 4W . S :D:6D m; �D i+,D .D.I P m(JI,w C) :-:r W:UI t.D r P• o:: F =Vl m 1 • 1• % • • • • :• • ♦ . • .• I• • • • • • • r♦ • • � • • • ♦ • • • 0 ti 0 W �j�YJ d 0'W D�.�D m•Oj J•V 'O O O L. m F;Q�d D\.F 'N 2 -0% W �nr m tm r, r W iN of Lr UI:tJf O O L-r w U:N iW O V� N w W .8-CD N W N�D o -. J 0 N y f i i u+_D+ v N c"-�d .D+F r u: m .D �- w .• o f W UN, F r { r F•+F.V Ut. m m U; 'O ti JV u- r v G G �D .F F U,.&, 'W .w c -� f~I f `+D+- �D r W J W 3 D, T f N O m ID W N F �D r U7 Vi.'T3 1 •• • • • • • • • • 11 a ♦ • .• • • • • • • • -• • • • • • • • v m W n O O'j, G W W w F t I m 0 0 0 6•rt D� UI O O G O O.O O O UI w O.0 cr r O O O:O O F'C O GI IF O N: �D i� 'T P ; F O:G O O'V Q CD I+ L U O O O O V O O;O Ul p:0 i r•+�+� 1 r,N O T; i r iJ OIF N ,Vt F fwi�D .D w ►•Ir 'N N i J F W . r� N N,trt F N��D .O m:F• ... !W m'N �F a+r � j w o L O U1 V' ID:0 :F t t ►+rn U F :� —m .D �[.r 0 O o m Coto —m.F -.I�D:►+�f o O O Ln Fro D,m'N u, J•I-.m[w N�rV O o f w�.c o 0...; s�v.r Ir Ln (31 %D m m'r v.tT• a'D: 'L� P i r P m Ut'.0 m o W J N o.m.+� P y fn r .r:fw w I r ,rn - i :• • • I• i • • • • :• • • • i• • • • • • • • • I� r [[: H W,�D A�' U. P• G:F 'D U' :-i D CD W 1-t�D F W C1 W n"S pN: p„.•.+ r r m • • • N • • .• • • :• . • :• • • q • • :(/, r w N:r m.c Cr r w-D'' v+v: F,F D� P { W V m 6. m W %D !O UI N.L.w F r Nw J W G-V to F fI Zc H w U.' NL^ -4 '.P N T-....O 'D'�+ A�L m s (( oto rV:0 r" ...I•.. t o Im N C, r :.F I W ►+ L" "D C mW OJ 0O f N tLP 2 F �"[to,FowIFJ - m p W O� O N W' O!cI V N R':D�m Vf.V,W Q ;O n i O O Oto N Oj O.0' N .O V1 J U' N 'Cr VI Cs-.rr N r.m V V :• • • i• • • • • • •• • a • :• • • O'O O 'O VI f.fl:0 Lf Vf:Ut N O rt7 :G O O#d O d:.is O O.O C O- d.IM .O C O O 0'd O o r C> In :.O O OiC_';O O:O G O:C) C' O G - '.000`000!0 OO:O GO- C) CD O OO OO a)'M G00 BOG O:C o 000000 C O O O C I F U7: J� > c,-4 .D WN -M, m rXW N r I G CI 0:0 x A1:U G N.� a m.. O G • !_ _ • • • • • • • • • V O C.O • :TI fJ _ r O, Ln L4 C IT1 U n G n G •+ O' m O c m z m �. m z m r m o 0 .: Cl) M o O U �_ n -. rl -a -� 3 r-I D G D -t a O a L 1-11 C) -v r z r m r z r r zm G'7 _ I •"I Z r x LJ rl r o m r r o s x y -n r- c a z !vl �n Ln:UI 1 -ft- 4.' 1 1'.1 1 4-- 'r-1 F r r 1 W W �8 �D .n ID 10 W W W W Li W W W IW .D r oiorrrrr•r O O O O OO O O is Ui I �O.�D �0 'L (): w WW W W W Ww. 'N j :v P O��O W UI 1 N ri0 �D W,V Cl Ul .i` W✓.. :•� •r (4 CO w N r•+ CO CO ri Us N F1W N r. it co 4k ' :L C<:O Tt w-v " 0 0 n 0 M n v —1 C x IO c7 j O z n-<n v@ G7' `O -/M VrZ m''.O•+-••"I�+ D Z7 mr 'rl ri '-I D ►'•DOrCrm''. Im C D 0 zS-I A N-( C D N O: :Z if 'S Cl) -i r O 2 •'+D 2- I z '. or nTJ im«, irnm< �n-cmm m mm-< rrn@rzrn m i .0 m wix z m X. m r 3 :Q x w -• m 0 o z I� <D1 D� X n a -i S -r n m ©-<m • ,�.z a'. .n r zir- rlm -.4r --4 J. r- 0 =1Z rl - r vnC -nZ zmr. r r< .. m-U X. 0 =1mn� vn ,nna�:oc a D -1�� n•,O s.rl N O z Z I A x I3 3• f '< 7L r .. O ..M. .3 G .v D':� -1 m Z ='-0 .m n ' r- 'a D L7.x F S r m A' < T� 7D.G m S 0 2- •'• OHS -a-.L IZ' Z M n -L'Z r- Z !z x i rn < G O a.Qo S C r mi rl N 'A a Z m ON a !A 'a ti d N N .�V .G7 L7 O 3 • 'V O pas ! r z n 3 3 : t 2 rn. Z W V L D; L7 v a --7 -V I In n a.; sr n.z o <z -Iv n i. Irl D rj N'N S i2 N n .A 1 N p• f ID.+ •.. I.+ N ... N V'1 r G:o .0 D O r n .lir N Wa W O+IW V LD UI W W N•..• Nr; C�-O W� NIN •U S `C 2 ti 0 N.N WFi W W O o r 00.(11 .G P o -i%D rir :w W IW 31. < N G C CD UI O o 0 C C v 0 L.'I.N O Lnl0�D O- O!O !O O V F'V O M,C3 N O'Ln V r L. Ln O'. r�r ,1 N -n VJ t � � r, W lo N D I� ol IW r�N r'. I O N1 r r N Wt•D P o' VIV 1 r T m A y N'tn r r N!N W GniDl F r.0 V N �. •D r:r F W1th CO Nor r \Ii0 CD O V'r 'N w jr •W W Oi%D V -,D Q`N',r V .0 .D �D,N V N,. F Cn W @ O;W x o:o N Nj Ln r r. -t'V ,-P O+ ID C M' :D� P o;•D(N w F �L r,tt r7 o •fi r �D'� S r j E N.G.�N�D.F W Or N VI:UI N O W'.�D .W N I.'9 N .F r O`.W%D N Ln r F'Lrl 1 CC U• 1'r L7 W O:O :O D W-:W O N:T N-L'W w OP 1 r W r NSD ID N Ln Q W,-+Ul N Ln N.a, F W o:0 O O I W 0�-.0 CJI IL N ID r,0,O N C Z W U1:N , - rl N N CD n O W. W`W N N y. l i w LF;.n N N IV N 1!F G W "•'1i W LM 1 .F r•r N LntV1tT D� N N UI.U1 �D :N .� OGO:.pOGG oO.OU O.O CO •nGO x,W oG rO.pO C>!C) GOO [n O.00r �•v 'rC OGO:O O G O 0I.O O O O U O7 O 00 N'N 10�n In O p00 +00 1 i ' I I � NIN... :Ul i(T WI �w r;N r W''.w 'N ? n'ln 'N•+ !n-'i N.N r r UI'N W fP.T r rt0 Ul UI,V1 N N l r r 1 1 W D�W Nr r V'O(L N r�r ?W W !O O CO W O��O-1 41 10 T fQ -+ .D.w �D •D m v N. V'V (J W 1 W UI (v m O'.W W O a N N(7 r LT 'D"D 'N m �D G.v : �Ci v 1 r ts:Vl P T I UI LD UI rV �D.1 to Or N vl Ui N r 111 '2 to F F O,W N LT. r F'Ll,.F W N L 1:0 Cl IL W':W ",O o r W W O N:a, N V W W P,1 r Cd: - ID �8 .� 1 W 1 N�,D%D N U' Cr V--+U; N N Ln N`O` 1 W N;N �^. �0 V O�:O Ln�D:N�` r'.?, o N O` �0 N'. N:N j InN'r r W 4.. 1 :W ��C C. V(.W V nIm N r 0'`U' Ln Ln O :.,W W PiN r N s Ln 'N a N jr -1 1 Ln W r m P X, F W �+--1 �•D V W DD 11:V 1 r N W 10 4"I 'W a �D N!C�- C111 �:1r r N VV UI Cn Ln 'N N P'O• -I N N N UI 'O Ul O Ln In O Ln M V1 O'.O Ln D O O .O O UI O O C o Ln IL'1 :U! • i rn p C [J:Cl C'1 1c,0 0 ('.3'C,b O'G ;n G O O C L, O 0 0 O G O O O.O ('J ,O(:1 1 C ,G O []:O co C G O O:G O OEO G OtO O 0 G:G O O G O O Ll O O O O:C', O ��,�� .'� O ('1'A '.G C ;V n, r 1 r,LAW L.+ W UI.UI W W rT -��V UI O. UI�Ln 'UI O W Lit 1 O, P 0-L4 N VI N N -! V N w W:6 Cl) O �ti G` O C 1 r ti ti r') C:1 t ("..G G N (✓ x [T U: '. P C G ca O G O O Ln N '1J t:.W P G O N G z r 4P N. G Z .Z7 C N C7 y G Z m ~ m C7 G o v z v m v -1 - O O A O r a r r c r .7 m \ 1 Z \ s ¢ r :n C y z k i � .D�D •0:ID%D F:F F r:r F F�r F F I .•D LD •D I.0 O:tr N Ln:Ln ut 611.�(P W:(J1 U1 Ui IW V 111:C11 1,tt N'CTI(JI i` F r 'W .D �D iW OD W W W W N N N'N N N W .o .0 i•b W 0 L Ln Ln;Vi r F F F r'F W W W W W:W N N'N N .W Nom+ :CO WN;r¢ W:N r L: .O Vm.rN rl 'co wN•r 00 n.F Nr+.o •D -40U! r•- ID -.UF N.v a.LA•+ ONN0LS0m._ 1O). :D D m K D:."i; t-+ D .. -1 O'm .�m ti o'~ h' C 1 m 0 r y C 3 N F O Cn Y C D h+,S C V 1 r. iG 2 S Z:G G1^n.�'1.� C m m Z ''W m D:=-1 D W O • a O 2 �'m ►� a a U O O O fff( I S X-•1 'D r,X 0 r x r,z O .2 "A m, m O L z 2'C m►•t U m m': m A:x r�6D r OD a r- 0 .z m x'r x :2 m -Icn �f A -1,'2mv Am CDmmmW f+ mI"DDInLmmOtomX 4 • D. V z:¢ •ti H 2'In W X. � 1�D w K;.� C \'Z►-K'C')C C- D -1"•!0 m'N � r4 vc,'m 6n,z me r' v c .. 0C-)'10 rimmrr c T z ' a 2 -'1 O w Z -4 r D 0 m 0 'D'-i O C'm r -• X R U) -n C N a A C 3= < N G A'C 1 1 .-1 2. K-I. 0 J.'M U m D'0-V m H z 0--I r 0 'S m DI -•C r-1'G7 a •-. 3 a', all m .='D co 0 7J .� mz2 D •-+ Gf7 • -J, gn • r 7 C I X�••� ¢ \m K 7C.x� r C o • S tu r m ':D -I D i m r u, r a c� ➢ j -�n r m= 1O'1 X 3 -4 z .-+',O a K D D GC` m Z-4rn LG) •. ACO03. •ti �O.yrrOr V. a'r xy :3 .., Sm: ti C) SKziit• \Ii r 2A DGr.D U'Vi 3 I 1 miy`DK ,, V. ZSmO Ln \,• C7 mti � zC7 a .T)� 22 N Z -iD2 i H H.7' r- V) NI -IS f'7 • �V. Grr- „1 y ►�D S I m-/ 0 z L K' O D 1 G in 2 - '9 ! I=1 v U'7 f•, :j- 00 - r0-r N N'W N O N-.= W n Ln -4 W W•N CD.OD W W.r W 0- %D U: W 10,O O r.tV v m r U' C W- -1 C C.0 )+N W a0'Lp N 61`W N N O o �D o IV •D G r m W a •D F -•,m 0� r ¢r U7';m r f- 0•r -�:D K N y r Ut o illi a 0+.1D UI ili CID D% O W Ui �O W o O 461 O 010 U1 N;U;O CD N N CIO O Ln C O O i0 6 O CD O p j m �1 i CD • i V t �1 I i f C 2•c f') X m N CT f i �V N V D JD N (J1'N W N iF N W''Lr. F N.F -4 V'-• F O N��h+ 'F+ N It'N �.D O �p�N O�D,W�p •D.W ►'C2 C% r F O F Ln W:N Ln 0jly W F,r+ o �D;C) W :W F iN N W'�D�r w iLn O it 6, 1 m z ,UI t m'-• 11 I•••'F F N N F F'OD r N �m �8� r(,� N - w V N m S v'%D W w CD- .F CD 0, ti O)O:OD O N,N�O ID O m 3 F -1 Ui W aI POO W'N¢T N r F CJi O r W r D:W O�- N N DD.F"1 2 W m II ' I iV'm Ln La N m 01 9' O W O . I + O �..� N • N\ N T: m Uco D OiNT1N W PO - LW O• rDND ;CDT •Dpo .4tt%D {V F iV) -1 Tv .t CO i i V �r.. i+►.1F�r In; � wi •D . vi W T,W O DT: [II m •L h • • • 1 • • • • .• ♦ • • • • :• ♦ • .• • • • • • • • a • .• • • • • • :• • • s • • • • • :• • • . 00"I! N O G o:o O •h cD mNI00 F O O ghim! �' 000CJ t'Joo O In O 0o N O COO 0.000:000 N0 k IO O NI Lnc, O C:0 0 0.'S. d 011 w.W O O T I 6. :.. o o 'J O O'0 C3 M CD O G O O O O.G O O i0 C)G r o I 'm W L4 "J w N:a r r T m(A-W 4 �D r o W' N m ' i•fl N N N N O•O W.n W T d .D.VI m W O a O� [11 Ln N/.1 A. O•D.�W W? N N fb•Y+0� f+' W N O '0 G V '[n H -1� T v V'+:a d W ti [>>[!1'U.O h•N m t Ut LA N i-+ ID N:T C+tn',N W¢ ;+.. J :l tb T..1 O a;m C N w 1 C'. -� O� a G c E. fvF:o o Z.W O, ►•` N N 2'F N f- C.+ � -i a m N co ¢W N m m m Lq.- L' A ID r F r P! �c V O m - � N W O V'\D 61 V N F m r m [n CD 0 O i7 Vt m G r t r i ',� W CO0p1 N W O>t'..W C O-FJ v W U r CD F �'' .�; O-IV ^.J Co W'm r v'.D N t0'\ v V'O m %D w V L-,LD V r H V I o CJI j f•! r 'b K I N DD. W �.U U;a, c�W Z cs O', !F 1 ! CN71 r N C r NCD C>`.- r pD � �� W I o L4 I'O O` :O al G OO NO Go oOtr Oi U1: ' f V i �1 : 00 irn i •O O Oj o O C C3 O O C`1 O o C+ O:Ct c)GI CU O O,G O O'O Q[7'O O O.O O0 O:O O O.0 O O;O ."'7. O.o Ll j' O o:o O G'O o CI C.,C) o o n o' 0 CD O o;G C7 0 0 0 CD i=o O n c) O n O o Cni G O.o C, C, I CD w N jr Nm N F W N; W 1 i •'' 'm • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • '• • • • • • • • • • • �• • • • C m .Ir tC' O ¢ •�.G C.v J U G �+ ll. V C L.�i 4 V v 1(. O f7 C C.O G OO Ceoc. C..o ¢ cam nC,i -a+ o• Ln z ; S: Z G N C O N 0 a m - t m m m -L rl C 0 w -0 rr -0 'm 7 C m Y W 3 3 a �' H rti -i Cl) r O U N L n S a m e r z r z r ri r z m Y r f". r ;- x \ n a r n T C Z O � � ,cloLTo+'sma�:amm'� 0,a, a, mP'Cla, a o+ a r, o �D O..D .O Olrrcr a {"D 'D :Q IO W w.W W L4:N N N N N N:N N N- r r r'r r r r ?,. i Ul G CO.4. •O r 4-' -' ,W N r jLA .P W N r c, 'D co-W D, In J, LA N -j C0 V ON Ul r W-N r r; 'r I 9 Lw'.N-+9:.T.L a.Ut r f I= x-0 'D n r•r c) O:=3 3'� Y 4 'y Z'►+a a�a• O m-L�'D D m' '�a a OO v m'r m m:. .5 m O:z ;Q L Cz 7 S;Sxz 'r •tiV UZO1Tz I'll r 2�+r, r'^ �•"r rt r- 7C 7C:7C• r.Zrr;AXr�' .m ZrrnN-mm O' z I m;Zz2.2 Z k m x H r O`6).'V f r ;0 0 MIM m< N -4-'l:s x a z; m n'D N z c n �s r:Or- 3> �'+r..^). Dr :N z D•-L N N:r.r z T' '..vrmr: l is 3 3 D '9 O.0 O.� n n n.L�-• Fra v) C)r-� 'M N; :a :< O Ory -i m 0 0'0 Z :.0 '•+ z='N O' -0 3 0. z C \ C-Tl Tl•tF -i D. .O n ra Z .N D m: n :.z -0 a -i m 3- 3 r m r r . Z m m m N Z n m m r1'm m L,r \oaaao �oo -� a �' a -ovvvv n n :;X-- TQC D) N O C) a nanDD x a Cr+z'M Z 3 3 3 r-L m m o' 1 O:z �.z-4 m U a',3 n x 3 Z: :;u w A x S f v \ a n \n r z \z. z z z N n v m > Ono z-r -+1 N-4 'Ti -1GOD r zNzN tin Y nAMHT G� -u T Ln r r r N Lnto W w r'►+cl• r N r•Ln N '.N r N '.0 O ►+n I N r N W l V CL n Lry W W;N CA LJi'O G W N),Lir, a cm 1\) CP W N , O Cai P P CP N N W ti N r w r C z O �- {.L W W W, %n LP !V V P • • is • • �• • • :• • ♦ • • • • • • '• • • • • • • • • • ! ', • • • 'i 4• • • • • • I• • • • • IN r : "'i jP O C) O O,r U1 aP,x O U1 0 O O,r O O'• W'O(A 0- C3.11b, O;.p r O O� C)C) U1 W O 0 0'O Ln Ln b O ;.. N _i O N II II � C S horn j ;Km VIW W W r m A rQ� wtrrLn -LwQ0:rrwL.+ ooa' �0tL: V.r, a Wcn:rLA -4 -41 1c).4 W'WCOr;WrA•V.V irn rn -C •v W �D.L r a,C. T DIV r 0)•V N OPV O .D; wtcP LF CD;'D 00 m W.P Ln V i A:.R i� O►+'D.+ 10 �D:C)w UL r CA;O�W V N N W'N P O:O� .D 0�•N� G. ri.D N o'.D.- raD In w W N N !LA Ln W N 4-r,�D Q` C0-•KJ .D !�N rt • • • • • • • :• • + .s • • • • • • i• • • • • • • • • • • s i• • • :• • • r• • • .• • ;Vl ti z V N �D'.G S T W r W.D Q+tno N Cr�'N" LD �D ISD N W1 W W;O�UI r r� v�N 'W N N r�D w�V O Oro -,,D O W W V a 0' Ui,W W CD;FlZ LTA" r Lw M;ID V w N L+1.M w N N1 4-J, ;%D C'V'N P MiOD Ut -+.D� V I { Ul N w 10 W CT L. LF. IL w:N L Ui Y - r J Ln N . .♦' J: r; .i� c N.%L w U. w4. : -y rt i .0 L { .O O G CD O O O r N:U.D C,L O O'CJ W-+ r.LTI ✓t O O 4, O O W Ln U1 O O G:O O O0 n, LT co co O r O C O�D N r�V t O.O Ln O.O Ln LT Ln O O {N O G.O O (Z IO O O.O O - rn'Lr x cn r V w ON- N!w .r W,L U7 it IJ:'D O LM Ln m W O•+0 W r r Ln'".D V ��. :N V w'W Co r�C.L r r .L.1 '•O O .-J m 0 o 9 r-:r a M L4 N N.1 O W O:LT -+tL.D r O.w LD ... 00; 1-"S .W O a+ 0:, n D C, -4tT ? ;U; r tL'C^ W V N S Cn:r CT U n P.G r U, U'' N N ,'ti Ln O,� r r%D Q,tOIG +C "� n • +• • • • • • • • • • • • • + • • �• • • • • • • • • • k • • ,• • • • • • !• • • • • 1W r 61 T LL W a,'.O a a5.0 N 0'..N U7�0 W;Ln V W f v L.4 C, P P., ut Uf .(T N N r.D wi.L Ln o r O k •tC O Cr+ W r P N r-r P Cr N �D C,F- O Ln ►+ P V,V,W V t.:W N �t -,I! A.0 TkO: Ui r'.0 .a -c r r r N tT r r r O r N N 0' Mb z O r:N W V ul N C A o Vi r C W A':Lb 4- "r! •Cn W N'N CD :0 =` N V CL I.- Or �a Q7P O4. SDN C)w Lrr o " nCD a` L1: CPQ 'O C Cz Vs C cc - N r N N Plr r Ct .I r -+C.O O r:.o Ui O Com, .N i�O'D N j'9 m LnO V1 Vi U1.0 OU? O U1 N.N U1 O L9.O V1OG O O:OO oOI tCj :Od O.Ln L" 1 • f • :• • • • • • • • �• • • :• • • • :• • • • • a • 1 • • is '• :• C O.C. O O o.0 n O.O O O;n O O O; (J O +O G O O p O;O C CD C)O f GOO-GOO.CJ C7 O:O O O O O CJ!O MO G'C C. CCO On OO O G O.CI O O'-c O O O O C W-.T t-i 7V.N W Z Ut N. F.0 41 41•L7 •C)• .•:� G F��tl.`.V(�, Nw LJJ( CC C!T-ia� •G=,CD.W Nr aD-a� NWN (TI (it UN' - 17, 0. rN : LnUO UV r N Ln y IL W 0 (11 r•� w W OG La 2 J r N N Z A c 2 c c o o v T a m z m a m c rn a o c -, r -♦ -r ri T -, n rl O -1 O -1 P 1 -1 -q :0 O •. G n - m r2 z G: -11-+ o v r v n D v m m r m In A r') a m o T z c z 0 k I f i '0 �+1 ( T P•-P P. P:P 1O I I ~"t N N N VI N J.N J c I �c� 1 c� o:cn z fn ZS T x rn m -ti S'fq DIA O I D i M N A L V/'a , z �cm ..mr D o �zn z .G rn: .D rn 1 A a {y I o a N c rn.Z z f oc0 a m 0 :3 m K Z m I 1 'm O A I-•'m j ,i LOZ~ T fq N A 3 I I i w N r F+ C O ► r7 I { ' W.. ►"" :: N r- N(7• N C Z K O I ; t O: rr UINN NC, N.ED WO .Ab KCn In ? Otn E i i rn I a) ;XZ 0.I x m rn ({ vrn c � N: IN W F Cr H T- m A F i0s N►+ W h0 N LW .r n rn K I j m: !N I0 0'I O -N.N In 01 'D O 3 t o m:o N P 'A 0 m0.*I I t • • • • • ;• • • • • • Z I I I O O O! O O V, 1 . I I T O O' O,O IN W O V1 L'1 CD AD :N N , I I 2 �1 v�. �1•V N 'r1 O H •.•I •Ll .O r+p.. 'C-4 U. r-I EA L. m In o u o r ON N N. ' I I I W' ♦+r �:� ��N In N! N N :N h+�•+ W.D i�D .r+ to ,O O f '•O: Bl 5 0:.n •r+F+ m O 1•+ N m .a% m fn-1 oa:� r , { I • s .• .♦ to r r i I I r w Wi W W F••+ %0 C,.N � N� NO a,C, :CA w O N U CD'm Cn N ci1 i i f ON N: P I O:O r OS.H P ;N N N! o.o N N N:N n o cl c� i rn 1 i f O O OI O O C.�C O O b G'G -O O i 2 f[ o' m o; o o n o 0 o n n n o 0 0 �rn j I - 01 n O: 41.F -W W N--0 O N j ►'' r.1: V V W o V W V W r n r .a W N U' Gt TENTATIVE AGENDA JJ .REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JULY 15 , 1986 Mayor Reinke presiding 1] Roll Call at 7 :00 P.M. - Reading of City ' s Non-Discrimination Policy 2] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 3] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 41 Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterick are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. ) *51 Approval of Minutes of June 17th, June 30, 1986 and July 1 , 1986 6] Communications: *a] Douglas Olsen, Shakopee American Legion re : Tourism/Convention Center building *b] R. D. Sjogren, Metropolitan Mosquite Control District re : extensive mosquito breeding on the Mn. Valley National Wild life Refuge c] Virgil Mears, Chamber of Commerce re : lodging tax - to be provided 7] Public Hearings: None 8] Boards and Commissions: None 91 Reports from Staff: [Council will take a 10 minute break around 9 :OOPM1 a] T.H. 101 Traffic Operations *b] Budget Amendment for Temporary Inspectors *c] Inspection Backup *d] Car License Plates *e] Certificate of Occupancy Fee f] Application for On Sale 3. 2 Beer License by Paul E. Schwaesdall *g] Fox Run 1st Addition - Developers Agreement *h] Applications for Intoxicating Liquor Licenses *i] Surplus Vehicles j ] Approve bills in amount of $1 , 444, 558 . 24 k] Fast Tracking of Building Permits 1] Hiring A Planner I - bring July 1st item 110 m] Hiring A Receptionist/Typist - bring July 1st item 11p n] TH169/TH101 Improvements Shakopee, MN 4 (f) determination, Huber Park and Trail Corridor - to be provided r 5 .1 10] Resolutions and Ordin ces: &I Res. No. 2588, Denying A Conditional Use Permit for Wishing Well Farm and Training Center - on table *b] Res. No. 2587 , Accepting Bid on 86-8 Pavement Preservaticn c] Ord. No. 198, AmendiL� k"4+4�& Beer Licensing & Regulations 111 Other Business : ??1��X107� lav . i✓ D"O'K' 121 Adjourn to Tuesday, July 22, 1986 at 7 :00 P .M. John K. Anderson, City Administrator OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ.REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JUNE 17, 1986 Vice Chairman Wampach called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Cncl. Colligan, Leroux, Vierling and Lebens present. Also present were John K. Anderson, City Administrator; Kenneth Ashfeld, City Engineer; Barry Stock, Administrative Aide; and Julius A. Coller II, City Attorney. Mayor Reinke arrived at 7:15 p.m. Colligan/Vierling moved to recess to the HRA and Board of Review. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling moved to convene as the Board of Review. Motion carried unanimously. Vice Mayor Wampach asked if there was anyone in the , audience who wished to speak. There was no response. Leroux/Lebens moved to close the Board of Review, as of June 23, 1986. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling moved that the findings of the Board of Review be approved and sent to the County Auditor for certification as of June 23, 1986. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Reinke entered and took his seat. Colligan/Vierling moved to reconvene to City Council at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Liaison reports were given by the Councilmembers. Mayor Reinke asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to address anything that was not on the agenda and there was no response. Colligan/Vierling moved to receive and file the letter from Marsha Berry, Promotions Coordinator for REI, regarding the 10K Liberty Walk on June 29th beginning at Huber Park. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried. Colligan/Vierling moved to receive and file the letter from Anne Tuttle, League of Women Voters of Shakopee regarding 1986-87 Local Study of the appointment process of advisory boards for local units of government. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous None: None Motion carried. Colligan/Vierling moved to receive and file the letter from Robert Vierling regarding alley in Block 50. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous None: None Motion carried. Mayor Reinke said on July 4, 1986, there will be a Little Gopher Baseball Invitational Tournament in Shakopee and they would like Mayor Reinke to give a welcome. Mayor Reinke will be out of town for that day and asked Cncl. Lebens to give the welcome. Shakopee City Council June 17, 1986 Page -2- Colligan/Vierling moved to open the public hearing on the appeal by John and Jackie Schwartz from the Planning Commission approval of a conditional use permit to operate a heliport business on property located south of Highway 101 and across from Valleyfair Amusement Park. Motion carried unanimously. The City Planner reviewed the background of the Conditional Use Permit granted by the Planning Commission for Quest Air Service to operate a heliport in the I2 zoning district. The C.U.P. has been appealed by John and Jackie Schwartz, 2232 Eagle Creek Boulevard. Jackie Schwartz addressed the Council on her concerns of the noise factor involved, the generation of more traffic and with the racetrack traffic there seems to be enough, and the invasion of privacy and danger involved in flying low. Fred Hodeman, Twin City Tite and Marble, stated that the development of his property would be impeded by the helicopter service. The same factors that Jackie Schwartz stated would also affect the commercial properties as well. Cliff Stafford, 2328 Eagle Creek Blvd. presented a petition to the council of people who are also concerned over the affect of this helicopter service to their homes. Leroux/Lebens moved to receive the petition. Motion carried unanimously. Shirley Sindelar expressed concern for noise as well as safety from Flying Cloud Airport. Susan Malek, 2205 Park Ridge Drive, stated that she was opposed. Joan Lohman, 2250 Eagle Creek Blvd. , presented a petition of other residents who are also opposed to the helicopter service. Leroux/Vierling moved to receive the petition presented by Joan Lohman. Motion carried unanimously. Steven Strehlow, 2487 Hauer Trail, stated that he also objected for the reasons already addressed by other speakers. Colligan/Wampach moved to close the public hearing. Leroux/Wampach moved to reopen the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Richard Stark, President of Quest Air Service Inc. addressed the Council and members of the audience stating that they did not choose to go over any residential or commercial areas on their routes. He introduced Al Perez, President of Northern Sound Who did the sound test. Mr. Perez stated that there is no chance that the standards on noise would be exceeded by the helicopters. Shakopee City Council June 17, 1986 Page -3- Considerable discussion ensued between audience members and Mr. Stark on the concerns of noise and danger involved. Mr. Stark stated that it would be a recreational amusement for the City of Shakopee and that the helicopter would also be made available for emergency use to the public. Mayor Reinke asked if there was anyone from the audience who wished to address this issue. There was no response. Lebens/Wampach moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Wampach/Lebens moved that the request for a conditional use permit to operate a heliport for an amusement ride business by Quest Air Service Inc. be denied. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling directed staff to prepare the appropriate resolution for Council consideration including the reasons given tonight. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling moved for a 10 minute recess. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling moved to reconvene at 9:15 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling moved to approve the One-Year Economic Development Plan as submitted by the Industrial Commercial Commission. (Doc. No. CC-118) Roll Call: Ayes: Cncl. Vierling, Wampach, Leroux, Colligan and Mayor Reinke. Noes: Cncl. Lebens Motion carried. Discussion ensued on the reconsideration of Final Plat of Prairie House lst Addition entrance off of 101 at Valleyfair. The City Planner stated that Outlots D and E do not have any access to the frontage road which will be constructed along the north side of 101, so the frontage road is being extended to the east end of the plat. The Fish and Wildlife Services owns Outlot E and they are purchasing Outlot D. Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2577, A Resolution Approving the Final Plat of Prairie House 1st Addition, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling moved to direct staff to prepare an ordinance to amend Section 11.60, Subd. 9 of the City Code for above ground bulk liquid storage. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried. The City Planner reviewed briefly the amendments to the City Code: Racetrack District, P.U.D. , Definitions, Clubs and Lodges uses abutting a State Highway. Wampach/Vierling moved to receive and place on file the letter from David Yarusso requesting to have his land placed in the Racetrack District. Motion carried unanimously. Shakopee City Council June 17, 1986 Page -4- Concerns were raised by Don and Lorraine Parrott on the proposed splitting and rezoning of their property. They do not wish to have their property split so as to be in two different zones. Fred Hoisington addressed the audience on the kinds of uses compatible to the racetrack and what the transportation patterns should be to serve the uses. Dave Yarusso addressed the Council requesting that he would like to either be left zoned I1 or brought into the RTD. If his land was zoned R3 it would be useless. Leroux/Wampach moved that the portion presently Il including the Yarusso property, Parrott Property and Al's Landscaping and the properties in between be retained as I1 zone, and that the portion to the north become R4. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried. Leroux/Wampach moved that the property of Danny's Construction be removed from the RTD and remain I2. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried. Leroux/Wampach moved that the southwest 10 acres of the Koskovich property be rezoned from Il to RTD. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried. Leroux/Wampach moved to direct staff to prepare the appropriate ordinances to amend sections 11.40; 11.02, x/99; 11.28, Subd. 3, 0; 11.32, Subd. 3, J; 11.33, Subd. 3 J, as per the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and as noted in the memo from the City Planner dated June 12, 1986. (Doc. No. CC-119) Vierling/Wampach moved to grant preliminary approval of the proposed amendments to Sections 11.36; 11.20 and 11.21 as per the Planning Commission recommendation, and subject to Mn/DOT approval of the RTD Concept Plan and including all changes from tonights discussion. Motion carried unanimously. The City Planner reviewed the draft of the Position Statement of the City of Shakopee on the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework (MDIF). Transportation is a key element under the Regional Business Concentrations r, (RBC). The major businesses in Shakopee are within 1.5 miles of the central business district. We have two major tourist/recreation centers, a large grain terminal and an industrial park with total sales in excess of $100 million, therefore we clearly qualify as an RBC. The public meeting is to be held by the Metropolitan Council at the Eden Prairie School Administration Building on Wednesday, June 25th at 7:00 p.m. Council consensus was for Mayor Reinke to give a formal presentiation of the City of Shakopee Position Statement as drafted by the City Planner dated June 25, 1986. (Doc. No. CC-120) Colligan/Vierling moved to make the change of total retail sales to over $300 million. Motion carried unanimously. Shakopee City Council June 17, 1986 Page -5- Discussion ensued on relocating the City Council Chambers to the Shakopee Public Utilities meeting room. Leroux/Vierling moved to table the City Hall office relocations until the joint meeting with Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion ensued on part-time/Reserve/CSO Officers. Chief Brownell stated he is strongly opposed to part-time peace officers simply because they have the same authority as a full-time officer and are required to have fire arms and first aid training. It was brought up that they could also assist in office work if the assistance is needed. Leroux/Vierling moved that staff follow the direction of attempting to incorporate the position of community service officer into the Police Department for 1987. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling. moved to authorize staff to purchase a records management system from AmeriData Company at a cost of $1,500, as per written proposal. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried. Colligan/Vierling moved to hire Brian P. Clark, as a porbationary Police Patrol Officer starting July 1, 1986, at step one of the Police Patrol pay rate of $22,667. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried. Colligan/Vierling moved that no further consideration be given at this time to the construction of a frontage road immediately south of Hwy 101 between CR 83 and Sheily Road. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried. Leroux/Colligan moved to approve the 1986-8 Pavement Preservation Seal Coat Project as presented in the City Engineer's June 13, 1986 memo and to direct the City Clerk to advertise, as required by State Statute, the request for bids to be opened 10:00 a.m. July 10, 1986 and to be considered by City Council at 7:00 p.m. , July 15, 1986 or thereafter. (Doc. No. CC-121) Colligan/Leroux moved to approve the 1986 Pavement Preservation Overlay Project as presented in the City Engineer's June 13, 1986 memo and to direct the City Engineer to incorporate this project with the Timber Trails 1986-5 Improvement Project. (Doc No. CC-121) Vierling/Leroux moved to direct the City Engineer to draft a resolution initiating a capital improvement project for the rehabilitation of Jackson Street between 10th Avenue and 12th Avenue and Harrison Street between 10th Avenue and 11th Avenue. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried. Colligan/Vierling moved to approve payment of bills in amount of $293,913.59. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried. Shakopee City Council June 17, 1986 Page -6- Leroux/Vierling moved to authorize proper City officials to enter into an agreement for participation in Urban Corps Program between the City of Minneapolis and the City of Shakopee for the period of July 1, 1986 to June 30, 1987. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried. Colligan/Vierling moved to authorize proper City officials to enter into an agreement with Scott County to provide for the assessment of property in Shakopee by the County Assessor. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried. Leroux/Colligan moved to take the non-intoxicating liquor license applications off the table. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Vierling moved to approve the application and grant an On Sale non- intoxicating liquor license for Coll-Prahm Inc. , 2400 East 4th Avenue. Motion carried with Cncl. Colligan abstaining. Vierling/Leroux moved to approve the application and grant an Off Sale non- intoxicating liquor license to Tom Thumb, 590 So. Marschall Road. Motion carried unanimously. Wampach/Leroux moved to approve the application and grant an On Sale non- intoxicating liquor license to Kwai and Grace Poon, 237 East 1st Avenue. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling moved to approve the application and grant an Off Sale non- intoxicating license to Brooks Superette, Inc. , 1147 Canterbury Road. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Wampach moved to approve the application and grant an On Sale non- intoxicating liquor license to Aires I - Daniel J. Pecha DBA Pizza 'n Pasta, 584 Marschall Road. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Vierling moved to approve the application and grant an On Sale non- intoxicating liquor license to Marlene Jarrett, 222 East First Avenue. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Wampach moved to remove the intoxicating liquor applications from the table. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Wampach moved to table the application for Off-Sale intoxicating liquor license from Valley Liquor Inc. , 1102 Minnesota Valley Mall. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Leroux moved to table the application for Off Sale intoxicating liquor license from Weiss Company, Inc. 8522 East Highway 101. Motion carried unanimously. Shakopee City Council June 17, 1986 Page -7- Leroux/Colligan moved to approve the applications and grant On Sale and Sunday intoxicating liquor licenses to R. Hanover, Inc. , 911 East 1st Avenue. Motion carried unanimously. Wampach/Colligan moved to approve the applications and grant On Sale and Sunday intoxicating liquor licenses to S.E.L.F. Inc. , 911 East 1st Avenue. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Leroux moved to approve the applications and grant a Sunday and On Sale Club intoxicating liquor license to VFW Post 4046, 132 East lst Avenue. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Colligan moved to table the applications for On Sale, Sunday and Off Sale intoxicating liquor licenses from Friendly Folks Club, Inc. , 122 East 1st Avenue. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling moved to approve the application and grant a Sunday liquor license to the Pullman Club Inc. , 124 West First Avenue. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Colligan moved to reconsider liquor license applications of the Knights of Columbus Home Assoc. , Inc. , 1760 East 4th Avenue. Motion carried unanimously. Wampach/Lebens moved to approve the application and grant a Club liquor license to the Knights of Columbus Homes Assoc. , Inc. , 1760 East 4th Avenue. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2573, A Resolution of Special Commendation to Richard Kaley and moved for its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2576, A Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for Timber Trails Road Improvements, Project No. 1986-5, and moved for its adoption. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried. Colligan/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2578, A Resolution Authorizing the Vacation of a Certain Easement Herein Described and moved for its adoption. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried. Wampach/Lebens moved to authorize Mayor Reinke to respond to the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District 509 Water Management Plan on behalf of the City of Shakopee. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Vierling moved to offer $500 to the Chamber of Commerce to offset some of the promotional costs of Shakopee's appearance at the Taste of Minnesota Festival. Funds to be taken from the ICC budget. Roll Call: Ayes: Cncl. Vierling, Leroux, Colligan, Wampach and Mayor Reinke. Noes: Cncl. Lebens Motion carried. Shakopee City Council June 17, 1986 Page -8- Leroux/Wampach moved to adjourn to a work session on June 30, 1986 at 7:00 p.m. , when the Council so adjourns. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Colligan moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 11:30 p.m. Judith S. Cox City Clerk Carol L. Schultz Recording Secretary OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JUNE 30, 1986 Mayor Reinke called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. , at the Shakopee Public Utilities Building, with Cncl. Wampach, Leroux and Colligan present. Absent were Cncl. Lebens and Vierling. Shakopee Public Utilities was repesented by Lou VanHout, Manager; and Commissioners Jim Cook, Barry Kirchmeier and Jim Kephart. Also present were John K. Anderson, City Admr. ; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk and Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer. Colligan/Wampach moved to remove from the table liquor license renewals. Cncl. Leroux stated his opinion that it was improper to consider liquor license renewals or any other items not relevant to the joint meeting with SPUC, because of this meeting taking place on Monday, rather than Tuesday evening, and outside the regular Council Chambers. Discussion followed, with the City Clerk clarifying that a copy of the agenda was mailed to the press, as usual. Motion failed with Cncl. Leroux and Mayor Reinke opposed. The City Clerk informed Councilmembers of the circumstances surrounding the request for a new Letter of Credit in a 'lesser amount to be provided by Canterbury Park 2nd Addition as provided in the Developer's Agreement. Discussion followed regarding the advisability of considering this item at this time, as the developer had been informed it would be on the agenda. The current Letter of Credit is scheduled to expire on July 1, and all public improvements required, except the walkway, have been constructed and accepted by the City Engineer. The developer proposes to put cash in escrow for the walkway, and wait for construction until further development occurs. The SPUC Manager addressed some comments to the uncompleted water looping, for which an agreement has not yet been signed, although it is expected to be. Leroux/Wampach moved to accept cash in a reduced amount equal to 125% of the cost of the remaining improvements for Canterbury Park 2nd Addition. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Discussion followed with SPUC regarding drafting language in the Signal Agreement between MnDOT and Shakopee identifying duties and responsibilities for maintenance of signals. The SPUC Manager stated that currently no one monitors the signals, but when they are notified a light is out, they will repair it. The City Admr. would like some written procedure for the City notifying SPUC and SPUC agreeing to repair the signal. It was decided that routine monitoring would take too much time and incur additional liability for the City. However, the City Admr. would check with some other cities to see how they are handling these problems. Shakopee City Council June 30, 1986 Page 2 Leroux/Colligan moved to direct staff to work out tentative language for an agreement with SPUC for signal light maintenance. Motion carried unani- mously. The City Admr. summarized the reasoning for the paper exchange of the fees for electricity being provided to the City by SPUC. Because of the Local Government Aid formula, the City would be eligible for $7,000 to $8,000 more if this is reported. It would just show up on the audit as a billed service instead of a free one, either monthly or at the end of the year. Commissioner Cook emphasized that changing the accounting procedure was no problem, but SPUC doesn't want to lose control of the authority for mainte- nance of the street lights. The SPUC Manager said the City Council has always had the control of whether or not street lights go in, and SPUC takes care of the maintenance of them. He pointed out that the $40,000 is the cost to SPUC, but the benefit to the City is more like $120,000, which is not reflected. Discussion continued regarding where the firu_' aut::=rity would lie for putting in street lights of a certain design or efficiency. Leroux/Wampach moved to direct staff to work with the auditor to come up with an accounting procedure for acknowledging the transfer of the cost of utilities from SPUC to the City. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Wampach moved to maintain SPUC's authority for maintenance decisions regarding street lighting and implementation of all new street lights; with any variances to be mediated between the City and SPUC. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion followed regarding the ordinance to be drafted to allow the City to place delinquent utility bills on the tax rolls . The SPUC Manager stated at this time there are some apartment building owners who do not want the utilities turned off at any time and have signed agreements that they are responsible if the renter doesn't pay his bills. Comm. Cook said this prob- lem accounts for about $6,000 loss out of $4 million dollars of income, and therefore he doesn't think the paperwork would be worth it. The SPUC Manager suggested just using this technique to go after the larger accounts. If this language was in the Ordinance, it would still be up to SPUC to get the necessary information and agreement from the property owner. The City Admr. was directed to do some further research on this item and check with the City Attorney about possible discrimination if the agreement is sought with some property owners and not all. Comm. Cook asked if the zoning is proper for SPUC to move its pole yard to the water tower in the Industrial Park; and he was answered it was I1 or I2 but that SPUC should check with the City Planner on all requirements. SPUC said they would be ready to move the poles before the trees were ready to be planted. The SPUC Manager asked for a different location for the dumpsters for the annual clean-up program. He said they often block the only door that is big enough for semis, and there is a lot of broken glass left afterwards. Shakopee City Council June 30, 1986 Page 3 The City Admr. cited the reasons for this location were the convenience, closeness to the Police Dept. and ease of clean-up because of being on gravel. Consensus was to continue this location for another year, marking out an acceptable area which would not conflict with the large door, with better cleaning up after. The pros and cons of the use of SPUC's meeting room as the City Council Chambers were enumerated. SPUC's primary concerns were with control of the public to keep them out of the private areas, both in front and near the restroom area; the number of meetings which would conflict with the running of their business and the lack of adequate space for large meetings. Consensus was to not consider the meeting room at SPDC as an alternative for a long-term City Council Chamber. The City Engineer reviewed the utility relocation policy for the following projects: 1. Fourth Avenue East of Shenandoah Drive; 2. Fourth Avenue from Filmore to Scott Street; and 3. Holmes Street storm sewer lateral project. The City Engineer recommended the cost for utility relocation should be paid for by the project when there is no benefit to the utility to relocate, and only the project is benefitted. The utility would pay the cost of re- location when the project could be physically built without relocation of the utility, but SPUC's comfort level dictated the relocation. Comm. Cook agreed with the City Engineer. He suggested also if a water main is more than 50 years old and a grade change occurs in a project, SPUC will pay for the materials--but not the labor--for the relocation. Discussion continued regarding the adequacy of the 5% allowed for unexpected costs, and it was decided to have a general policy, but analyze cost on a case-by-case basis. The City Admr. clarified that although the City has a general insurance policy, when SPUC is the active contracting agent, it is SPUC's responsibility to submit claims and follow through any subsequent legal action, in such cases as the water tower painting. The City Admr. explained that after the banners were put on the light poles, it was discovered they were higher than the flag holders, which now have to be moved above the banners. However, the City's equipment cannot reach that height, and SPUC is requested to move the flag holders and install the flags on the appropriate days. The City will pay for the services. The SPUC Manager agreed to move the flag holders and put up the flags when necessary, without charge to the City. However, he requests the agencies who have the flags get in touch with them and deliver them. The City Admr. and SPUC Manager will get together to write out an agreement for these services. Shakopee City Council June 30, 1986 Page 4 The SPUC Manager said he has no problems with the Public Improvement Check- list. However, the SPUC Manager complained of developers making water taps before written approval. The problems were further reviewed with building permit procedure and time chains for developers. The City Admr. was directed to meet with the SPUC Manager and the Building Official to try to identify problems and tighten up procedures for approvals necessary before building takes place. The City Admr. informed SPUC of a request by a rural subdivision to have garbage services contracted by the City. In an attempt to get all the utility billing at one location, the City is asking SPUC to consider billing these accounts that have only garbage bills, with no electricity or water. The SPUC Manager said the areas where they don't supply electicity may be a problem in practice because of people not cancelling garbage services which is separate from other utilities. He thought the headaches of paper- work would not be worth it. They agreed to explore it further if necessary. Comm. Cook enumerated the major capital improvements SPUC has completed in the last year, and the projects anticipated in the near future. John Bernstein, of Valley Liquor, appeared before the Council and requested their consideration of his liquor license, so he would not have to be closed for a day on this critical pre-.holiday week. He explained the State and insurance companies are so busy right now because of all the licenses being due at the same time. He said it was not his fault that the application was so late because the other agencies just were slow in the processing. Mr. Bernstein was informed of the reason for the failed motion earlier. Colligan/Wampach moved to remove from the table consideration of liquor license renewals. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Colligan moved to approve the application and grant an Off Sale In- toxicating Liquor License to Weiss Company, Inc. , 8522 East Highway 101. Motion carried unanimously. Wampach/Leroux moved to approve the application and grant an Off Sale In- toxicating Liquor License to Valley Liquors, Inc. , 1102 Minnesota Valley Mall, with the condition that the proper cancellation endorsement be de- livered to the City Council by its July 1, 1986 meeting; otherwise, it will be suspended. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Colligan moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting ad- journed at 10:45 p.m. Judith S. Cox City Clerk Diane S. Beuch Recording Secretary 1 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JULY 1, 1986 Mayor Reinke called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. with Cncl. Colligan, Leroux, Wampach, Vierling and Lebens present. Also present were Julius A. Coller, II, City Attorney; John K. Anderson, City Admr. ; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; Judi Simac, City Planner; Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer and Barry Stock, Admin. Aide. Leroux/Vierling moved to recess for an HRA meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling moved to re-convene at 7:09 p.m. Motion carried unani- mously. Liaison reports were given by Councilmembers. Cncl. Lebens requested consideration be given to charging a fee for police time requested for opening car doors for people who have locked their keys inside. The Shakopee Police Dept. informed her they have about 60 such requests a week. Cncl. Lebens also requested the City Engineer contact Mel Lebens regarding the previous storm sewer project at Second and Atwood, as he has knowledge of those plans. Mayor Reinke asked if there was anyone present in the audience who wished to address the Council on any item not on the agenda, and there was no response. Leroux/Wampach moved to approve the minutes of June 3, 1986 and June 10, 1986 as presented. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Mrs. Grannes requested her rural development area be included in the City's garbage contract. She believes that one truck picking up once a week would r be better for the roads. At this time they also pay between $8-$9 per month for garbage pick-up, which is higher than charged in town. Leroux/Wampach moved to direct staff to prepare some background information regarding the ramifications of including the rural development areas in the City's garbage contract, its possibilities and precedent setting probabilities, its cost and availability, along with the billing possibilities. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Wampach moved to accept and file the letter dated June 11, 1986 from Col. Ledding of the Minnesota State Patrol regarding additional Troopers in Shakopee. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Colligan/Wampach moved to receive and file the notice from Samuel Wetterlin of the Jackson Business Park requesting a property rezoning from AG to R2. Shakopee City Council July 1, 1986 Page 2 The City Planner pointed out the location of the property, and stated it does not fall into the area about which rezoning is being discussed on CR-17 north of the bypass. Motion carried unanimously. Dave MacGillivary, of Springsted, Inc. , informed the Councilmembers of the bid opening for the $2,105,000 GO Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, in which only two bids were received. He further explained some of the intricacies of ad- vanced refunding. He recommended awarding the bid to the Norwest Investment Services, Inc. , et al. at the interest rate of 7.1057%. Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2584, A Resolution Awarding the Sale of $2,105,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1986A; Fixing their Form and Specifications; Directing Their Execution and Delivery; and Providing for their Payment, and moved its adoption. Roll Call: Ayes; Vierling, Leroux, Colligan, Reinke, Wampach Noes; Lebens Motion carried. Vierling/Colligan offered Resolution No. 2583, A Resolution Awarding the Sale of $1,645,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986B; Fixing their Form and Specifications; Directing their Execution and Delivery; and Providing for their Payment, and moved its adoption. Roll Call: Ayes; Colligan, Wampach, Vierling, Reinke, Leroux Noes; Lebens Motion carried. The Springsted representative informed the Council that only one bid was received on the remaining two smaller bond issues. He said they were some- what concerned about that, but upon counsel and research, they are advising awarding these bids to the sole bidders. Apparently, it isn't too unusual in these circumstances and these are as good or better than the rates other communities received on sales that same day. Colligan/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2582, A Resolution Awarding the Sale of $500,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986A; Fixing their Form and Specifications; Directing their Execution and Delivery; and Providing for their Payment, and moved its adoption. Roll Call: Ayes; Reinke, Leroux, Vierling, Colligan, Wampach Noes; Lebens Motion carried. Leroux/Wampach offered Resolution No. 2585, A Resolution Awarding the Sale of $355,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1986B; Fixing their Form and Specifications; Direction their Execution and Delivery; and Pro- viding for their Payment, and moved its adoption. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. The City Planner reviewed the application and approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a commercial feedlot to be known as Wishingwell Farm and Training Center, with six conditions. An appeal of this approval has been submitted by Gilbert Laurent, Jerome Vierling, Lawrence Vierling and Eldon Greenwood, who do not feel this is an appropriate use of the property. Shakopee City Council July 1, 1986 Page 3 Leroux/Lebens moved to open the public hearing on the appeal of the Planning Commission approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a commercial feed- lot to be known as Wishingwell Farm and Training Center. Motion carried unanimously. James Robin stated he is an attorney representing the applicant, and he would answer any questions necessary. Jerome Vierling, 1461 CR 79, said he was representing the Lois Fleck pro- perty and he feels it is devaluating her property. He described the property as being 50-100 feet on one end and 300 yards on the other, between electric tower and the proposed by-pass. He said the land was purchased over 50 years ago to be used strictly as agricultural. He would think there would be commercial development in that area when the by-pass comes through. He thinks putting a feedlot on that property would limit any other development in thea7ea. He is also concerned with the possibility of well contamination with all the other subdivisions nearby. There will also be air pollution, with a lot of southwest winds carrying the smell into Shakopee, so that the City property will also be devaluated. Lawrence Vierling stated he agreed with Jerome. He would like to see the horse business at one end of Shakopee, not surrounding the City. This is the area where Shakopee can expand. Jim Ramaker, of Glen Ellyn, said he is representing the homeowners of Glen Ellyn and read a petition objecting to this proposed use. They do not think this is a proper use of this property as it is too close to other residen- tial areas and the boundary of Shakopee. The petition is signed by 17 people. Wampach/Lebens moved to receive the petition and place it on file. Motion carried unanimously. Gilbert Laurent, 1371 Pioneer Trail, Chaska, stated he feels the same as these other people. He has the land just south of this property. Eldon Greenwood, 1674 South Marschall Road, has the property just east of the proposed feedlot. He asked if there was any thought of the future residential development in the City. He thinks the City is being surrounded with horse training and feedlots. He would think residential development will move south, as there are houses out there now, and a feedlot will stop that development. James Robin, attorney, said he believes the term "feedlot" is a misnomer. He knows the difference between a thoroughbred training facility and a cattle or swine feedlot. He said the problems of water and air pollution are being addressed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) , and one of the conditions of the Conditional Use Permit is the approval of MPCA. These horses will be handled identically as those at Canterbury Downs, and he doesn't think there will be any pollution problem. He thinks a horse operation of this nature makes a tremendous buffer zone to the south of proposed by-pass. This is an operation that can be started now and it could handle the incremental financial burden of a leap-frog development, without the utility demands of various subdivisions. This proposal also means an increase in tax base for the City and some additional employment for the youths of Shakopee. He maintains it will be a very attractive development, which will be a credit to the City. He pointed out that the majority of the land will remain green. Shakopee City Council July 1, 1986 Page 4 Comm. Leroux asked about the permanence of the barns, to which he was an- swered 25-35 years. Comm. Leroux expressed his concern about this per- manence in light of the residential development which the City is antici- pating will occur to the south of the urban area. He believes there will be multi-family development next to the by-pass, rather than commercial. He doesn't want Shakopee to be in the situation of having a feedlot sur- rounded by residential areas. He suggested consideration of a sunset clause stating the conditional use permit would be revoked if the land immediately adjacent to it were rezoned residential. Comm. Colligan commented that it was a fine plan, but not in this location. Jim Ramaker stated that in Jackson Township there is a horse training farm, and he can attest to the smell of it on some days in Glen Ellyn. He understands they are proposing a cement trough for the horse dumpings, which will ferment and cause an odor. Al Miller stated he is representing the property owner and he pointed out that Mrs. Fleck did make an application for a residential development and was turned down. Now she has the opportunity to sell the property and it may not be allowed. She had been turned down on development plans on two different occasions for two different reasons. Mr. Robin emphasized that the by-pass zoning wouldn't hurt the use of this property for the proposed purpose, it will make an appropriate buffer, it can bear the incremental financial burden of development nearby, it will be pretty, and the MPCA will make sure there is no water or air pollution. In answer to an inquiry Mr. Robin stated there will be no residential units on the property. They would like to have a residence, but it was not allowed by Planning Commission. Cncl. Wampach expressed his concern that Shakopee is running out of property to develop residentially. He added that no matter how beautiful the situa- tion, horse manure is horse manure. John Collins, 109 East Mound Street, said he spent a lot of time next to a track in California, and he is concerned about the people who will be work- ing there, such as illegal aliens. And he also wonders about what will happen when they are not working, would they be added to the welfare lists. The City Planner informed the Council that notices of this hearing were sent to property owners within 350 feet of the property. Mr. Ramaker stated he sits on the Jackson Township Board and they did receive notice of this meet- ing. Mr. Robin asked for clarification of the appeal process, and Mayor Reinke explained that once the appeal has been brought to City Council, the Council then deliberates on the issue and makes its decision. Lawrence Vierling said he heard of this action through the grapevine, with- out receiving official notice. Mayor Reinke asked if anyone else wished to comment, and there was no response. Shakopee City Council July 1, 1986 Page 5 Leroux/Colligan moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Lebens moved to direct the drafting of a resolution denying Condi- tional Use Permit No. 464, citing the possibilities of water and air pollu- tion and the proposal is inconsistent with the Comp Plan at this time. Roll Call: Ayes; Leroux, Colligan, Wampach, Lebens, Reinke Noes; None Abstain: Vierling Motion carried. Leroux/Lebens moved for a five minute recess at 8:21 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Lebens moved to re-convene at 8:37 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. The City Clerk recommended executing a revised Developer's Agreement for the Fox Run 1st Addition with regard to the construction of the road, since it apparently will not be needed for a long time. Colligan/Leroux moved to approve a revised Developer's Agreement, for Fox Run 1st Addition, as approved by the Assistant City Attorney. Fred Corrigan, developer, further explained the circumstances which led to this request. He has private access now and will not need a road until there is more development around the property, which will help to determine the location of the road. He said it has always been his intention to con- struct a full length road, but they are unsure of the location at this time. A request was made that the reason for the revised Developer's Agreement to be very specific, so this wouldn't be precedent-setting. Discussion ensued regarding the City's right to construct a road on its own initiation. Leroux/Vierling moved to table this item for further language revisions to insure the City's ability to initiate the road construction. if desired. This is acceptable to the developer. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Corrigan asked for clarification that there would be no escrow deposit or accelerated cost to the developer under this revised developers agree- ment. He was advised that this is correct. Mr. Corrigan updated the Council on behalf of the Scott County Transporta- tion Coalition. He said their major concern now is to protect the priority of the by-pass plan with the next Legislature. They have initially been lobbying at the metro and State levels. Brandt Richardson informed the Council of the progress on the Bloomington Ferry Bridge project. Mayor Reinke informed him he was told the legislators around the Santa Anita Racetrack in California would be supportive of these efforts to construct the Ferry Bridge and the by-pass. Mr. Richardson said the Senators are the key people to contact right now. Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2586,A Resolution Soliciting the Support of Senators Boschwitz and Durenberger for the the County Road 18 Bridge Crossing Site, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Shakopee City Council July 1, 1986 Page 6 The Admin. Aide detailed the remodeling which would be necessary to move staff into the Council Chambers. Cncl. Lebens couldn't see the expense of permanent walls when there should be a new City Hall within two years. Cncl. Leroux explained all the potential conflicts for meeting space if the Chambers were to be moved to the SPUC meeting room, because of all the committee meetings and pre-construction meetings that take place all day long and evenings. Cncl. Lebens suggested the meeting room in the Fire barn. Discussion con- tinued regarding remodeling that would have to be done to accomodate staff upstairs at City Hall. Leroux/Vierling moved to support Alternative No. 4, remodeling upstairs and first floor of City Hall, as presented in the staff memo from the Admin. Aide for maximum use and efficiency at a cost not to exceed $17,100. Leroux/Vierling moved to amend the motion to direct staff to look into bet- ter sound insulation upstairs, with the potential of closing up windows. Motion to amend carried unanimously. Cncl. Colligan asked about the handicapped accessibility waiver, and whether an extension is necessary, and if at least the chambers could be handicapped accessible. Roll Call on Main Motion as Amended: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Leroux/Colligan offered Ordinance No. 197, Fourth Series, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending the Shakopee City Code, Chapter 11 Entitled "Land Use Regulation (Zoning)" by Repealing Subd. 9 of Sec. 11.60; by Adopting a new Subd. 9 of Section 11.60; By Adopting by Reference Shako- pee City Code Chapter 1, and Adopting by Reference Section 11.99, Which, Among Other Things, Contain Penalty Provisions, and moved its adoption. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Colligan/Vierling offered Ordinance No. 203, Fourth Series, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending the Shakopee City Code, Chapter 11 Entitled "Land Use and Regulation (Zoning)" by Amending Certain Sections, and Repealing Certain Sections as Hereinafter Setout and by Adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code Chapter 1 and Section 11.99, Which Among Other Things,Contain Penalty Provisions, and moved its adoption. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Wampach/Vierling moved to direct staff to authorize payment to Shakopee Public Utilities for the overrun in the amount of $729.72, for the erection of the Chamber sign, with the funds to come from the Industrial Commercial Commission budget. Discussion followed. Roll Call: Ayes; Wampach, Colligan, Vierling, Reinke, Leroux Noes; Lebens Motion carried. Leroux/Wampach moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into a joint powers agreement with Scott County for the provision of shared Building Inspector services. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Shakopee City Council July 1, 1986 Page 7 Discussion followed regarding the amount suggested to be charged for a temporary Certificate of Occupancy. A suggestion was 10% of the building permit fee. The intent is to make it high enough so a developer will work to get the money back by compliance, but not too high to make it a burden on smaller residential developers. Colligan/Vierling moved to direct the issue of charging for a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy back to staff for further research on the fee schedule and other alternatives. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Vierling moved to receive and file the report on TH 169/101, Alter- native Review and Selection, which narrows the selection to two alternative alignments. Motion carried unanimously. (Doc No. cc-122) Considerable discussion ensued regarding the possible creation of a Management Information Systems (MIS) position. Cncl. Leroux pointed out that it should be remembered when making this decision that this position will be permanent and will actually grow over time, in his opinion. Dis- cussion continued regarding the percentage of time one person would spend on this position and the percentage of time that could be spent on engineer- ing duties. Leroux/Wampach moved to create the position of Management Information Systems, and to fill the position with Stephen Hurley, to take as much time as is necessary, with the balance of his time being used for engineering. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Reinke suggested during the free trash dumping program there should be staffing on evenings and week-ends, and that service organizations should be contacted in this regard. The City Admr. suggested the summer youth employees of the Public Works Dept. could also be used. Colligan/Vierling moved to direct staff to provide free trash dumping pro- gram for 1987, with volunteers or part-time staffing. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Leroux/Wampach moved to direct staff to proceed with renewing the insurance policies that the City had for the past year. Motion carried. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes;None Lebens/Vierling moved that bills in the amount of $105,717.47 be allowed and ordered paid. Motion carried. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None The Finance Director handed out Amended Five Year Capital Equipment Lists and pointed out the changes and deletions in the various departments, and the reasoning for them. Because revenue will not keep pace with budgeted expenditures, various suggestions were made to get money into the Capital Equipment Fund, such as the townships Fire protection fees, tax increment funding, and the racetrack ticket tax. Shakopee City Council July 1, 1986 Page 8 Colligan/Wampach moved to accept the Amended 5 Year Capital Equipment List, and direct staff to find fixed revenue sources to offset the projected deficit. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Leroux moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to exe- cute Cooperative Agreement No. 8602 between the City of Shakopee and Scott County, which provides for the installation, funding and maintenance of a traffic control signal at the intersection of Marschall Road and 4th Avenue; hereby amending the January 7, 1986 Council action in this regard. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Leroux/Vierling moved to approve Change Order No. 1 to the 1985-1 4th Avenue Reconstruction project in the amount of $8,136.00, with the cost of the change order to be funded by State Aid funds. Roll Call: Ayes; Wampach, Reinke, Vierling, Colligan, Leroux Noes; Lebens Motion carried. F` Leroux/Wampach offered Resolution No. CC 452, Conditional Use Permit Resolution of the City Council No. CC 452 (denying a conditional use per- mit for Quest Air Service, Inc. to operate a heliport) , and moved its adoption. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Leroux/Wampach offered Resolution No. 2579, A Resolution Apportioning Assessment Among New Parcels Created as a Result of the Subdivision of Land Parcel No. 27-908-071-0 and No. 27-909-013-0 (Canterbury Park 2nd Addition) , and moved its adoption. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. The City Engineer said the low bid for the Second Avenue Parking Lot landscaping is approximately 5% below the estimate and he has been told the firm is reliable, and therefore he recommends award of the bid. Vierling/Leroux offered Resolution No. 2581, A Resolution Accepting Bid on Second Avenue Parking Lot Improvements, Project No. 1986-7, and moved its adoption. The bid is awarded to Noble Nursery, Inc. in the amount of $40,896.03. Roll Call: Ayes; Leroux, Vierling, Colligan, Wampach, Reinke Noes; Lebens Motion carried. Leroux/Wampach offered Resolution No. 2580, A Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for 4th Avenue Rehabilitation from Fillmore Street to Scott Street, Project No. 1986-3, and moved its adoption. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes;None Motion carried. Leroux/Colligan offered Ordinance No. 196, Fourth Series, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending City Code Chapter 1 Entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to The Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" by Adding Provisions Relating to Titles and Public Officials; and Making this Ordinance Applicable to Every Chapter, Section or other Provision of the City Code, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Shakopee City Council July 1, 1986 Page 9 Colligan/Lebens offered Ordinance No. 198, Fourth Series, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending City Code Chapter 5 Entitled "Liquor, Beer and Wine Licensing and Regulation", by Defining and Redefining Certain Definitions; by Changing Provisions Relating to Proof of Age and Unlawful Acts by Minors, Financial Responsibility of Licensees, Beer and Liquor License Requirements, Restrictions and Unlawful Acts; by Adding Pro- visions Relating to Alcoholic Beverages in Certain Buildings and Grounds, Consumption and Possession of Alcoholic Beverages, and Temporary Liquor Licenses; by Repealing Provisions Relating to Unlawful Acts by Minors; and by Adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code Chapter 1 and Section 5.99, Which, Among Other Things, Contain Penalty Provisions, and moved its adop- tion. Motion carried unanimously. Lebens/Vierling offered Ordinance No. 199, Fourth Series, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending City Code Chapter 6 Entitled "Other Business Regulation and Licensing by Changing Provisions Relating to Insurance Requirements Generally and as to Taxicabs; and by Adopting by Reference, Shakopee City Code Chapter 1 and Section 6.99 Which, Among Other Things, Contain Penalty Provisions, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Colligan offered Ordinance No. 200, Fourth Series, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending City Code Chapter 8 Entitled "Traffic Regulations" by Changing the Provision Relating to Adoption of Certain Statutes by Reference; by Adding a Provision Relating to Motorized Golf Carts; and by Adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code Chapter 1 and Section 8.99 Which, Among Other Things, Contain Penalty Provisions, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Wampach/Leroux offered Ordinance No. 201, Fourth Series, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending Chapter 10 Entitled "Public Protection, Crimes and Offenses by Changing Provisions Relating to Tres- passes upon Land; by Repealing Provisions relating to Consumption and Possession of Beer, Wine and Liquor on Public Property and Private Parking Lots; and by Adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code Chapter 1 and Section 10.99 Which, Among other Things, Contain Penalty Provisions, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Wampach/Vierling offered Ordinance No. 202, Fourth Series, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending City Code Chapter 14 Entitled "Regulating and Governing the Use of Parks" by Repealing a Provision Relat- ing to Alcoholic Beverages in Regulations Governing the Use of Parks; and by Adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code Chapter 1 and Section 14.99 Which, Among Other Things, Contain Penalty Provisions, and moved its adop- tion. Motion carried unanimously. Cncl. Lebens agreed to continue as the liaison to the Planning Commission for one more six month period. Leroux/Vierling moved to recess for an Executive Session at 10: 37 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Vierling moved to re-convene as City Council at 11:47 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Shakopee City Council July 1, 1986 Page 10 Leroux/Vierling moved to adjourn to 7:00 p.m. July 15, 1986. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 11:48 p.m. Judith S. Cox City Clerk Diane S. Beuch Recording Secretary Shakopee American Legion POST #2 1266 East First Avenue Phone 445-5253 0 SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 V"✓f/M qW'/7 rl�- �,?7�fi1.c?-rl✓t , 1�7 y� fid% , . f (Y" ANOKA Z O Cr r u HENNEPIN „METROPOLITAN MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT s 2380 WYCLIFF STREET • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114 ■ 612-645-9149 SCOTT DAKOTA R. D. SJOGREN, Ph. D. W. J. CAESAR Director Business Admin. June 27 , 1986 John Anderson , City Administrator 129 E. i.st Ave. Shakopee., MN 55379 Dear Mr. Anderson: In the early 1980 ' s the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) decided to form the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge� (MVNWR) in the interior of the metopolitan Twin City area.'. When the formation of the refuge was under study, the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (MMCD) submitted its concerns over the long term mosquito breeding problems which have been encountered in the proposed refuge area. The concerns expressed by the District were excluded from the MVNWR final report. :; Extensive property has been purchased, leased and/or otherwise brought under the MVNWR control while in the process of being ./secured.�" In 1984 , the MVNWR notified the MMCD that permits will be required for any mosquito control on a refuge. In 1985 , a lawsuit was filed by environmentalists against the MVNWR to stop mosquito control� on the refuge based on their opinions that totally undisturbed wildlife habitat is best. The MVNWR has notified the District that no permits will be issued to the MMCD for mosquito control until they have finished studying the matter. The United States environmental Protection Agency is charged with the responsibility to determine the environmental safety of mosquito control materials . The MMCD has proposed to use a soil bacteria (BTI ) and a mosquito hormone mimic (Altosid) for control on the refuge. Both of these control agents have been granted use registration by the U. S . Environmental Protection Agency and are widely recognized as being the most specific control materials available. The USFWS does not accept the environmental safety rulings of its sister federal agency and although they acknowledge the materials pose no TH 169/101 lntersection Rgr i 1 SS, 1 986 ,ane to be restr'ic,ed zc,r SOr,le d l st an`e a l r,r-,r� i s on t he south s1de. Parking is at Avenue erefor-e, :ar-Klrim reStr�C� aDrernit_trll Oc,wn-cwY,, at carefully, lOrtS r,-_pQd c,71. be locked Rdd i t i s r,a 1 ane cr TH 1 E c, one. Westo wod Z-rlgineerir,a completed a stl_lmy bf the TH 1E9/101 metrics arid itersectio ❑ec- IES bridge geometries Of leve you have a , I TH nn whi�h I be- lieve Since that Stud mini-byPa=_s concept and Y, the entire briane wc,r-k a sOi a„ is being looked rSomewhat different light. .There is Of that study that i l a Dortlon s Still l or; interest that may - vide interim solutions to y pr-c R inadequate bridne capacity. lane design ( SOI_ttnbO and and I northb� discussed in that study ,•,thereby eliminating the Llitnplace walkways from zhe deck. 1 `C'^t 1 ares. The and grout d i ng for three - tc' be relocated pr'o'posal called for the walkway below ,.he deck (excer are attached) . qts o; the report Two 01_leSt i cans carne t o mint: Car, tnr'ee lanes be Drovided oeck Deometricthe ext sting a-1 y and structurally, and ; =. Can the walkway be eliminated e + tris fr_,rtn nt irely during coming Design ar,d implementation period Of the permanent improvements? T f tna aXiStiYtg St1^,1Ctllr-e the e e � l _ C2Y, nan�le tris a^r-'itic,na.1 l[ _ al-th0!!^n the in?iyi vY C! y;a br^i ❑ne relay irj=`rease Wit .�21ane5 = oual lane cagacitY WC1U_2 d deer'=ase. The si nor-tn boLmd wotald o th rim 1e think that the ei e Cf COmDonent• _T wOUlg aISC, irn_rlat i on o. the walkway �- a Jnr T n ., �r-ar-y c=r,ly, nlu- „ De _or,slnered The preceeding are various suggestions the cOL!ld Ccinsider'. These 4 T=tnS "i 1 I y Det'r_—a S VC-Ur S-aff S1 da•'1Y1= t'^aTT1^ -Iane -_rr she rt1CSt part CQn— +`�'"aC1tY `SUeS. Other iSSUeS sider-ed also SnOuld be corn- - , mase being user safety. I thank you for your time arid the a = ar g tern_ C.- Yot_lr Staff for cor;- S10_, in these SL!�geStIons. S1nCerQl V, Ken �Srl-a1}d� , City ar:_ineer KR/nnlD June 27 , 1986 Page 3 Congressman Bruce F. Vento 405 Sibley St . St. Paul , MN 55101 In addition to the above persons you may wish to contact your state legislators at 296-2314 ( House of Representatives ) and 296-2343 (Senate) . MN House of Representatives MN Senate State Office Building State Capital Rm. 231 St. Paul , MN 55155 St. Paul , MN 55155 Sincerely, R. D. Sjogren , Ph . D. Director cc: MMCD Board of Commissioners ?R0PC,SA:, Tree lavouts have been prepared to show potential relocation of the -_ H 169/ 101 junction from its present location at iioimes Street and 1st Avenue to a new 'intersection approx '_=ately 150 feet north. The attached layouts show concept plans based on 3 river crossing options : • Construct a new bridge for southbound traffic with 2 thru lanes plus a southbound left turn lane. Utilize the existing bridge for 2 lanes northbound. • Widen the existing bridge to 4 lanes with no left turn storage lane. • widen the existing bridge structure to provide 2 lanes southbound while retaining a single lane northbound . Dach of these designs 'incorporates a sweeping curve to the southwest for TH 169 . Access to the CBD ( Central Business District) will be relocated from Holmes Street to an :ntersectior. with Fuller Street. All designs incorporate a channelized left turn lane In anticipation of a _raffia signal . i E k TH 101 will be carried on a new alignment located between 1st c Avenue and Levee Drive , returning to the 1st Avenue alignment west of Spencer Street . Two designs were considered for this ; align=ent : (` t 0 The Sc==erv_lle access design _ncorpora tes a major entrance to E 6ow.. to .7n Shakopee at So== e _ v _ 11e Sheet . This des _ n am __: pates t I o s i n a c_ Lewis Street nor. th o_` 1st Avem ue . h pedest _ / b_Keway underpass is shown at :zolmes Street to co=nezz downtown w_tn the regional trail facilities at Levee Drive. Vehicle access to the tra_lhead is provided CaDosite the Sommerville StreeL intersection and at Fuller Street. The alternative design using Lewis Street as the primary access from TH 101 to downtown Shakopee ::as also considered . This concept Incorporate-,. a signal - zed intersect-, on .._ th an at -grade crossing for pedestrians and bicyclists at Lewis Street . The des '_gn se -', -- : -- ed for development combined the best features from both o_ these conzepts . t Over the years , tra : _c movements on TH 169 and TH 101 have Continued to increase . both highways are major truck routes serving west -central and southwestern Minnesota . Recent development of the river port at Savage has resulted in high volumes of grain trucks traversing these h4ghways. The intersection of TH 169 and TH 101 has developed into a point of congestion , creating significant delays during peak traf --- ic periods . It is not uncommon to find a L mile line of cars waiting to cross the Minnesota River during the rush hour . MnDOT has addressed this Congestion by providing a channel ped southbound right turn lane and has proposed+ other amenities designed to speed the flow of traffic through Shakopee . A revised alignment of TH 101 ... known as the Shakopee bypass ... has been programmed for construction within a 5 to 10 year fire _rame . That alignment will remove -some of the grain truck :movements and may provide an attractive alternative for trips from southwestern 11innesota to the Twin Cities . However , the extent of diversion from the traditional TH 169/ 212 corridor to a new corridor on TH 101 and CSAH 18 hill depend on relative level OS Service parameters . in ar.y event , traffic Qemand at 1st r Avenue and on Holmes Street w4-11 continue to exceed the present intersection capac_fyp GL'r -o _g.- ­ car,: Or-�_OnS C- _ each Gay. Over the Ve2rS , _=prOve^enLS t0 the 1st Avenue/Homes Street _ntersect_On has been -1 -.- _ed b the n retain- y need L0 re a :1 a ,` szoric _ structure _n the northeastern quadrant Of :.-_S _. terSeCL_On a by use Of 1st `,venue as a bus iaeSS / Shop- _ng street fOr t 2e :,4 c 5Inakopee . In 19 .. 3 , ,'est o o d a...._no a _ng_r.ee_ _ng . y was retained t0 adv-se the city's Downtown Develc==ent rc==ittee _n the = r reviLclz on Of Shako pee ' s Central 3us _ neSs District. A key issue in the Cc=Wittee's aeli5erations involved the commercial frontage along 1st Avenue . Heavy traf - movements and h-gh truck volumes have blighLea the com=er _-a1 buildings along this street and presently Create a functio:al bar ter to the _nterac __on c commerccal ac_-v_L_es . After considerable del _bera __on and stud_ f r e es c alte nam v do:.uLown development concepts , _ _ was determined that the thru `raf__� movements should be removed from 1st Avenue in the core business district and new alignments for TH 101 were explored . The --_ ty contacted M..DCT through '_ll _zm Cr rd D_s ` - - " ' hr h a- _ _ C 'Engineer from MnDCT D_s _,. _c _ 5 to, dete-r_ne the r r ole _h i a/ addressing this problem. Mr. Cra..for. d expressed MnDCT's concern for the congestion and traffic delays in Shakopee and indicated a strong desire to work with the city in resolving problems in this area . ?4e indicated that , at the present time there are no =o-..,:.es available or programmed for _morove=ents at this location. He recommended that the city assume a leadership position in advocating progra=ming or reallocation of funds to effect _-provemen_s at this loca __on. The City of Shakopee has assumed this leadership role in preparing these preliminary geometric layouts. These designs are presented for evaluation and determination of costs and funding sources . A number of 4=portant questions remain to be answered regarding the structural capabilities of the river crossing bridge to accommodate additional traffic 1oads , -env ironmental issues and funding sources . Because of Shakopee's increasing role as a recreation/entertain- ment center, the urgency for resolving these problems increases. This important river crossing and management of heavy traffic volumes at this location must receive a 'nigh priority to insure X ree movement of traff_C through this area. i F r t i t 3 TH 169 crosses the Minnesota River on a 4 span , steel carder bridge which was designed and built in 1927 . 6 2 lane , 2 wav roadway is carried on a 30 foot wide structural section supported by three to foot deep steel girders placed on pie = s spaced at approximately 127 foot spans. Narrow walkways , slightly over 4 feet wide , are carried on outriggers cantilevered over theouter girders . Short -span concrete structures have been placed at either end of the bridge to carry highway traffic over Levee Drive, a railroad alignment , and access roads north of the river. Bridge girders are spaced at 14 .5 foot dimensions supported by piers -n the __ver. hav_gat_onal clearance beneath this bridoe C is substantially below the L' S Coast Guard mir.imu= S for a navigable waterway. Therefore , any modifications or improvements to this structure will require consultation with the Coast Guard and resolution of that issue . E r F E -c K R F C 44r 4 r E E 6 C Et� tl C � t L i [1 t1EE 1 4 M _.^.r.111.0 2RCPCSA..S 'Each of the three layouts is based on the =o? loving prer_ses . 1st Avenue rill be widened at Fuller street to pro•. ide 2 lanes eastbound ; 2 lanes westbound and a channelized lett turn lane for the westbound to southbound nove=en _ _rac signal control __ 1 be _ns _a_ led at TH 169 zale- Street • The new alignment o � TH 101 _ ll provi de a 4 lane undivided road section approachin= the new intersection w--; zh Tri 169 • A westbound right _ urn lane will be provided with a ch annel__ing i5land for traffic movements turning to tae north; • A channel _ze,. 1 _ght turn lane w_11 be provided for t he movement _rcm eastbound _ 169 to eastbound T:. 101 • A traffic signal w_ 11 be _ ._ stalled to cont - ff _ - ofat the new __. 169/ 101 _ntersectfon Dual d Fe Des_tn :he dual or_d,ge design an:ic_ teS use of the e:_S __ o s __ ___ture for 2 lanes Gf northbound _rat__._. As pro^oseG the vel anes 1 _ 1 o _c't:; _O e s:__ _ed sl " V ' _hE west to a l.mow ..OnS _rL'd __On 0 2 10 foo : ':_de .:a _1:::zy/ _Ke .:a � on the ea5 . side OC th_S ✓ . . Tae new struct __ e -111 cOmta_n 2 tnru lanes p1uS a 5 „ _t^ bOL'nd - - .._ ES cn an _ �_pa_ eS 2 lE- t ter tame C = a pr0X_rate1 y 250 feet - _ us ta pe _ , base _ en- d On Ci:r _ trz_ needs . Th.e dual bridge proposal is the highest cost -'_ver cross,' == and a y i n v o l v e S L'b S t ant.a l e v a l u a t i on because of t h e need f o r addressing environ=ental issues and the issue of .avigational clea _ zn _ e . Hoaeve _ , the sero. �r�d �e . an be bur '_ _ _ t.. a um d_s_ ..p__On to exist_. �^ _-aff_� opera�icns si..�E` -h - a _ e _n place bridge can be retz_..ed d.._ _no ane c0^_StrL`_t_On pe-_.,d. Tr REE'-.,ANE r)'EsIC; Realising that structural and environmental problems could result fn significant costs and unacceptable delays to accommodate the mfrfad of stud_ es and approvals , we offer a 3 lane desir { the existing substructure . �n using Tinder this proposal , the exfst ,' ng bridge would be �:-Widened slightly by removing the outer walkways and shifting the sin^ le northbound _ o f bound lane sl=ghtly downstream to P . vide room or 2 lanes southbound , anticipated at the lower A new wa .1kwav is river for pedestrians and level to provide access across the u L-cycl:sts . The 3 lane design has a m 1 F =n;Wa effect on ether navigat_onal clearance or en ironmentaI issues within the river bottom ,area. however , it offers some cons tr ; LL uct_on d _ icullties and may require single lane operation durfn sections . $ construction othe widened ` _C L. P7,. F i i r G L t L Y 3 LANE DESIGN _ =R Ji I f , I � ^ i w' __ _ pica C IO �NGIN_=RING COMPANY � Gir addressing t^is problem. *!r r Cra;:_ or. d expressed �+ for the conges • _on and _ 72-ffi h espee nDCT's concern strong desire to wort: _ t:7 the morays _n Shakopee and indicated a area . ie indicated tha - in resolving problems in this monies available proat the present time , there are no Fe recommended that arammed for improvements at this location. the city assume a leadership position in advocating programming or reallocation of `unds to effec - improvements at this location. ` The City of Shakopee has assumed this leadership role in preparing these preliminary geometric layouts. These designs are presented for evalua'ion and deter-�� sources . nation of costs and funding A number or important questions remain to be answered regarding the structural ca abiliti bridge to accommodate add ' ~ ior.al t ` aes�`of the river crossing issues and funding sources , loads , environmental Because of Shakopee's increasing role as a �. ment center, t encu t o recreation/entertain- ment urg mor resolving these problems increases. This important river crossing and management of heavy traffic volumes at this location must receive a high free movement of traffic through this area._g p�-o`-`y to ,insure J ' r u MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer/-�#— SUBJECT: Budget Amendment for Temporary Inspectors DATE: July 10, 1986 INTRODUCTION: City Council, at their March 25, 1986 meeting, authorized the hiring of 2 temporary inspectors for the 1986 construction season on an "as needed" basis with an estimated longevity of 6 months each. BACKGROUND: The estimated salaries and insurance is $19, 960. 00 and $289. 42 respectively. Resolution No. 2557 amends the 1986 budget to reflect these salary costs. This increase in salary cost will be offset by revenue frorn Engineering Services. REQUESTED ACTION: Offer Resolution No. 2557, A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2547 Adopting the 1986 Budget and move for its adoption. KA/pmp AMEND SC: =IGI; 2557 --_ION 2457r�Or.1 - 19 86 _ � f Co:...___Cns bud �_aC:w.S�c:.CeS .ne Ci.CC�L. IiT_hIi' -- -=, _- -- SC:..S BY -.0 C: : _:- HAI,_:at the "•, ^ :71. appro�_�stions -e lac_ 0 G= SHAI:G___, a- -eased as olio::s: �nAccount General 01-4130-411-41 (Temp. Salaries) 519,`960. 00 General 01-4143-411-41 (Medi-Care) S 259. 42 waded by _.._.:eases (decreases) _n the _e_ 1D: _fib mad Account Division General 01-3509 Enaineerinq $20,249. 42 !'_nesDca, eueid _n session o� the C_ry Council C= the C_:y CX is cap o= i o, - _.,.c . L=`_DV ed a5 to _C—= -,ls C.ay C. MEMO TO: City Council FROM: LeRoy Houser, Building Official RE : InspectLon Backup DATE : July 7 , 1986 INTRODUCTION: The Scott County Inspection Department, Prior Lake and our inspection department need emergency backup services in case of vacations , sick leave, etc . BACKGROUND: We presently have an agreement with Scott County. There are times when backup by either one of us is not available due to heavy workload . Prior Lake, at present, has no backup and wishes to enter into a backup agreement with us . An agreement for backup service is a benefit to all of us . Our proposed agreement with Prior Lake is basically the same as the one we have with the County. The only difference is it will be on call only. The payment to Prior Lake or the City of Shakopee is based on each inspector ' s gross pay schedule. RECOMMENDATION: Enter into an agreement with Prior Lake for backup inspection services . ACTION REQUESTED: Direct staff to enter into an agreement with Prior Lake for inspection backup services . LH:cah J LIDS A. COLLER, II JULIUS A.COLLER ATTORNEY AT LAW 612-445-1244 1859-1940 2 1 1 WEST FIRST AVENUE SHAKOPEE, 171NNESOTA 55329 June 24, 1986 ME1-10 TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Julius A. Coller, II, Shakopee City Attorney IN RE: Inspection service agreement The Agreement as tendered was basically ok but incomplete. I have retyped the first paragraph. CAUTION: Be sure that our insurance coverage will include vehicles and personnel: who are performing duties in Prior Lake and outside the City limits. Very truly yours, IUl 'ulius A. Coller, II AGREEMENT WHEREAS, The City of Prior Lake has enacted by ordinance the state building code for application within the corporate limits of Prior Lake and desires that personnel of the Shakopee Code staff provide limited backup suport to the City building official during the periods of vacation, sick leave and vacancies; and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee, Scott County Minnesota has also, by ordinance, enacted the current state building code for application within its corporate limits and desires that personnel of the Prior Lake code staff provide limited back-up support to the city building official during periods of vacation, sick leave and other vacancies. NOGG THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED BY and between the City of Prior Lake through its City Council and the City of Shakopee, through its City Council and pursuant to M.S. 471.59 that: 1. The purpose of the agreement is to provide upon request administrative, and inspection services to each city. These include: Plan review, footing, framing, insulation, wallboard, plumbing, septic system, and building final inspections; and/or all determinations of compliance or non-compliance of persons or entities engaged in all building activities undertaken under the building code ordinance of the City of Shakopee and the City of Prior Lake. 2. Upon request, the Prior Lake building code staff serves as the City of Shakopee's agent to exercise the duties to be performed as listed under item (1) and the duties to be performed under the building code and septic system ordinance of the City of Shakopee. 3. Upon request, the Shakopee building code staff serves as the City of Prior Lake's agent to exercise the duties to be performed as listed under item (1) and the duties to be performed under the building code and septic system ordinance of the City of Prior Lake. 4. Each city will be responsible for the prosecution of any violations of its building code and septic system ordinances. 5. The City of Shakopee agrees to indemnify and hold the City of Prior Lake harmless form any liability (except personal injury to city staff) arising out of services performed. 6. The City of Prior Lake agrees to indemnify and hold the City of Shakopee harmless form any liability (except personal injury to city staff) arising out of services performed. 7. The City of Shakopee agrees to provide worker's compensation, auto and general liability coverage for bodily injury to Shakopee staff in the performance of duties arising from this agreement. 8. The City of Prior Lake agrees to provide worker's compensation, auto and general liability coverage for bodily injury to Prior Lake staff in the performance of duties arising from this agreement. This agreement shall be continuous unless terminated for any reason by either party upon 30 days notice to other party. Made and executed at Prior Lake, Minnesota this day of 19 PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL Its Mayor Attest: Its City. Manager Executed at Shakopee, Minnesota this day of 19—. CITY OF SHAKOPEE By Its Mayor Its Manager MEMO T0 : City Council FROM: LeRoy Houser, Building Official RE : Car License Plates DATE: July 7, 1986 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Finance would like us to put the City emblem on the silver Malibu to compy with the state tax exempt plate law. This has not been done at my direction. I feel with the amount of time we spend on policing building code items at bars would give the public the impression staff may be taking a refreshment break at these places if the big logo was on it. Also, many times when we fill in for the County we use this car and are paid mileage for it. It is extremely visible and could give the public the impression staff is out in the country watching ducks or taking the long way around between inspections . The cost of the non-exempt license plates for this car is $59 . 25 . The cost of the City logo is $24 . 00 . The cost of a nontaxable plate is $15 . 00 per year, according to Gregg. ALTERNATIVES: Do it or don' t do it. RECOMMENDATION: Place standard plates on the 1982 Malibu at the cost of $59 . 25. ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize staff to place standard plates on the 1982 Malibu at the cost of $59 . 25 . LH:cah Attachment LL 1111 Illi LJIJI . league of minnesota cities DATE: February 25 , 1986 TO: City Managers , Clerks and Mayors FROM: Research Staff SUBJECT : City Vehicle Licensing and Registration Cities may be paying taxes and fees to license and register city vehicles which are not required by law . According to Minn. Stat . § 168 . 012 , Subd. 1 , municipal fire apparatus , police patrol cars and ambulances , the general appearance of which is unmistakable, are not required to register or display number plates at all . Cities who have paid for plates and registration for these types of vehicles should seek a refund from their local deputy registrar . This statute also exempts other city vehicles used solely in official business from payment of tax or registration fees . Vehicles used in general police work, arson investigations , and passenger vehicles , station wagons , and buses owned or operated by the department of corrections must register and display passenger vehicle plates supplied by the registrar at cost . All other motor vehicles used solely in the transaction of official business shall register and receive tax exempt license plates at cost . To qualify for tax exempt plates , city vehicles must have the city name on both sides of the vehicle in letters not less than 2-1/2 inches high , one inch wide , and of three-eighths inch stroke. Printing shall be painted on the vehicle with contrasting and durable paint . There is an exception for leased vehicles which allows the use of placards , but the owner must contact the chief of state patrol for seals to be affixed to the vehicle. Beginning March 1 , 1986 , cost for passenger and tax exempt plates for city cars is $30 .00 for two years plus a $3 .25 filing fee. Cities who wish a refund for emergency vehicle plates can return the plates to their local deputy registrar. Cities who wish to take advantage of the lower charges for other city vehicles should contact their local deputy registrar for information and forms . 1 E3 universlr,y avenue ec'sz, S`. Dauj, minneso�:;a E--E51 D1 CS-1 2) 2-27-5SCDC /r MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: LeRoy Houser, Building Official / RE : Certificate of Occupancy Fee DATE : July 8, 1986 INTRODUCTION: My previous memo on this subject dated 6/25/86 evidently had a flaw in it that Council discovered, and I agree with them. The proposed certificate of occupancy charge for commercial/industrial properties is too small. BACKGROUND: After giving serious thought -to Council ' s comments, I am of the opinion the commercial/industrial certificate of occupancy fee for new construction should be . 005 times the value of the project, or $500 . 00 , whichever is greater. This charge will be collected at the time the permit is issued. I propose we return 900 of the fee collected after the final certificate of occupancy has been issued. An example of the impact would be: Commercial project value $6, 000 , 000 x . 005 = $30 , 000 Retainage 3, 000 Refund $27 , 000 Commercial project value $ 250 , 000 x . 005 = $ 1, 250 Retainage 125 Refund $ 1, 125 I propose the same formula for residential properties with a cap at $500 . 00 $ 500 Retainage 25 Refund $ 475 I believe the upfront cost and the refund amount is substantial enough to attain project completion of all our new construction permits . Typical Example Residential project value $ 60 , 000 $ 300 Retainage 15 Refund 285 Residential project value $ 100 , 000 $ 500 Retainage 25 Refund $ 475 No other community is using this formula. It' s new and innovative. I do believe when it ' s in place and working, other communities in the area that are having the same problems we are having will probably follow suite. ALTERNATIVES : 1 . Increase or decrease the charge and/or refund. 2 . Do nothing. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the certificate of occupancy charge as outlined above. ACTION REQUESTED: Direct the appropriate city officials to draw up a resolution for Council adoption of the proposed certificate of occupancy charge. LH:cah MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator �} 1 FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk ,�f_ RE: Application for On Sale 3 . 2 Beer License by Paul E. Schwaesdall DATE: July 10 , 1986 Introduction and Background Application has been received for an On-Sale 3 . 2 beer license by Paul E. Schwaesdall dba/Pablo ' s Mexican Restaurant, 230 Lewis Street (formerly Tievoli Pizza) . The application is in order. Alternatives 1 . Approve 2 . Deny Recommendation Alternative No. 1 . Action Requested Approve the application and grant an On-Sale non-intoxicating liquor license to Paul E. Schwaesdall bda/Pablo ' s Mexican Restaurant, 230 Lewis Street, effective August 1 , 1986 . JSC/jms MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk C>�_I/ RE: Fox Run 1st Addition - Developers Agreement DATE: July 10 , 1986 Introduction On July 1 , 1986 , City Council directed the redrafting of a revised developers agreement for Fox Run 1st Addition to include insuring the City' s ability to initiate the roadway construction and to site reasons for the exception to the standard developers agreement so that it wouldn' t be precedent-setting. Mr. Krass has prepared the attached agreement. Recommended Action Approve and authorize the appropriate City officials to execute a revised developers agreement, versus the City' s standard developers agreement for Fox Run lst Addition, as drafted by the Assistant City Attorney. JSC/jms City of Shakopee Scott County, Minnesota DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT RECITALS: 1. The owners and developers of Fox Run lst Addition have received conditional approval by Resolution No. adopted the day of , 198for Fox Run lst Addition on the condition that such owners and developers enter into this Developers Agreement; 2. It is understood and agreed by the owners/developers that the City may be doing Chapter 429 Public Improvements hereinafter set forth at the owners/developers request, or at the City's instigation, and that the City would not be installing such improvements without this Agreement and the waiver from the owners/developers contained herein. 3. The parties hereto acknowledge and understand that a private road presently serves Fox Run lst Addition by way of roadways located in the City of Prior Lake adjacent to this development. The parties further recognize that the direction of the road to be constructed within Fox Run lst Addition is undeter- mined until portions of Fox Run lst Addition are further platted and cannot be determined at this time since the area is bounded on two sides by the City of Prior Lake. The City of Shakopee acknowledges that since it is not requiring the construction of the road prior to the issuance of a certificate of occu- pancy the standard City of Shakopee requirement for a letter of credit, cash deposit or 150% accelerated assessment payment is inappropriate. THEREFORE, the undersigned City of Shakopee and owners/developers of Fox Run lst Addition agree as follows: 1 . That the owners/developers of Fox Run Ist Addition hereby petition the City of Shakopee to install the following improvements and assess them pur- suant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429: Fox Run Ist Addition street construction in accor- dance with design criteria and standard specifica- tions of the City of Shakopee. 2. The owners/developers agree that such construction will occur when requested in writing by the then owners of either lot in Fox Run Ist Addition, or at such time as the City Council determines by resolution the need for such improvements. 3. The owners/developers do hereby waive their right to a public hearing prior to the City Council of the City of Shakopee ordering the improve- ments hereinbefore described and also waive their right to a public hearing prior the levying of the assessments related to said improvements and further waive all rights to appeal said assessments which shall be assessed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 as a result of the installation of said improve- ments. Consideration for such waiver is understood to be the City's acceptance of the plat of Fox Run lst Addition without construction of said improvements, which ordinarily would be a prerequisite to such plat approval. 4. The owners/developers of Fox Run 1st Addition agree to enter into an agreement with and pay the required fee to the appropriate utilities for the installation of electricity to serve said subdivision. 5. The owners/developers of Fox Run 1st Addition agree to pay the City of Shakopee park dedication fee in the amount of $250.00 for Lot 2 at the time of building permit issuance, or pay the amount designated by Shakopee City Council resolutions for the ultimate density utilized in said Lot 2. 6. This Agreement shall be binding upon the City of Shakopee, and upon the owners/developers of Fox Run 1st Addition, their heirs , successors and assigns. Dated this day of 1986. CITY OF SHAKOPEE OWNERS/DEVELOPERS P.A.C.T. Rolling Hills, a Limited Partnership By: Eldon Reinke, Mayor By: Attested to by: Its By: Judith Cox, City Clerk Its Fredrick J. Corrigan Linda M. E. Corrigan STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF SCOTT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1986, by Eldon Reinke and Judith Cox, the Mayor and City Clerk, of the City of Shakopee, on behalf of the City of Shakopee. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1986, by and , the and of P.A.C.T. Rolling Hills, a Limited Partnership, on behalf of P.A.C.T. Rolling Hills. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day of 1986, before me personally appeared Fredrick J. Corrigan and Linda M. E. Corrigan, husband and wife, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. Notary Public 6 �r ,7 MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Applications for Intoxicating Liquor Licenses DATE: July 11 , 1986 Introduction Two applications for intoxicating liquor licenses have been previously tabled by Council because they were not in order. They are not yet in order. In order to keep the applications from dying and republishing, it would be appropriate to remove the applications from the table and then retable them. Recommended Action 1 . Remove from the table the applications of Scottland Hotels, Inc . for On Sale and Sunday liquor licenses , and the applica- tions of Friendly Folks Club Inc. for On Sale, Sunday, and Off Sale liquor licenses. 2 . Table the applications of Scottland Hotels Inc. , 1244 Canterbury Road for Sunday and On Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses . 3 . Table the applications of Friendly Folks Club Inc. , 122 East First Avenue for On Sale, Sunday, and Off Sale Intoxicating liquor licenses. JSC/jms b Memo To: John K. Anderson , city Administrator From: Gregg M. voxland, Finance Director Re: Surplus Vehicles Date: July 10, 1986 Introduction & Background The City has surplus vehicles due to recent purchases. I have reserved two places for the fall Hennepin County auction and am trying to get a third place. Accordingly, Council needs to declare the below listed cars surplus so they can be sold. 1979 Malibu Blue - 8951 1979 Malibu Black - 9337 1976 Granada Red - 7454 Action Requested Move to declare a 1979 Malibu No. 8951, a 1979 Malibu No. 9337 and a 1976 Granada No 7454 surplus property to be sold at auction. GMR:mmr ♦ �N R Y R r Y R Y Y Y +Y Y Y r R R Y/'Y Y .- ► 1-- i Y �" 4 G R CU U ► O 4 O O R U 0 0 G 0 0 0 U R LJ R c]CQ U 4 0 • R G .'. W :� M L G ► n R .G G R .7 0 0 0 O O L7 R O R O Om 0 0 + • f'1 C' L.11 R W W R N N N11.) N N N • N rt Y �-' Y r�' ► �- * �+ n P ► r r • W • v1 Lr. R G` Q, IP P.Q, Ol 0'. Ol • r ► .r r F F F R N ♦ F 71 C i t O -11 G G O O 'CG 00 0 0CD u0 O 'O O C)CD 0 0 O O 2• V V V ti V G GO O OO UO O GO OO C, O C. GO OOzz G U Y �C ul �i. v W �L W '•C' v ... �L .D �. .D u. �L 2 .L .0 �.. P Q T n� U T Q+T T U v, T Ol of T Q', fT Q� T T ❑'' �` m �1 C O� P� { N..•� w;Y N,N W W LA F N Ln' W W'. m N 0; j F Vt F-A Dl N%D ! Y;r ID lT N O N-1 m OI I it co O'. YOY. W W OT O� OT .4�D ONUI;YW O;O YrJ1 UI Ln VN jW W • • ! I• • • 1 f• • • • • • • • • • • • • • , • t• • • . • • • • • ! W W 10- O r; {M ti F w-- N•.N W T N.a N.a, ti I co OJ ! F F G O o O 5 5,, I LP N W W0 O,, I O O CD O^N r.OD N \ r Co Ln W O F:f z 10 O O O O O O,' 1 U1 Ln i !f 1 i f j i CD CO2 j OJ .aa DabaDa'aa a DDDaa D D ! C ( xx m :V)V) .CC Cc CC.CC :V). 23353 M CC 5 0V) i-l -i-1 -ti��-4 CA r*im mmm I r D 0 z z m '0 0 •O D O.O G C O O 'O z M F z z H - (. yy z :nn 'n �� rr ►+.r I m z i o c y \\ n n Cl) n n n n n ►, n Cl) n n n o m C i z : : : mrn r'Immmm .D D:D J. ). I 1 '•z 33 rn '.m miz z z z z zz z •""I - z Z z z 44 m O m. ' M•. n n ,.," -1-. - -1,.4-1 .m - i rn y O O y Vi (�n -D a D a D a a a a x 571 yy yyyy�yy L �� z n :CC CC CCGCC .2 5922'5 C' t O O �••r Iy� �� y y"9� ;a D.n n n a zzz n, z;z � o z z z 3 .. m O m Lo y C7 O I m m m m rn mi m m I N •-t .,'7'•• M -'0 •, D c C r r I D D O D D O!O D :C z n D,Z 70, 2! C v 9 OO CCCCCC:CC '� "+'c -i<.-I G G •n rn! r.., y "9 O ! i h t-4►y rl HMI h-/N 1- r i 1-+ m 1-1 r i -Il'. -n 3 zs yr r ivovvvv. ov is ( az.zzW � I n rn.c m cs'.m � y; I rn •v ►r� Sm m j as sxxsxx.zs y m. I rn m Izz itir +...►+►r.�t, j I3 j G: 0 m z !-1-4 zzazzz:zz rn o �.ti -ti� -��-1-1 -• aznza ►+ ! t ! 2. .2 J -'4T-'1Tfn rn '-'1 i f I m t* z i I N O C D 'O O 10 0 0 0 0 0:0 0 10 M!Ln UI UI UI T' O D i .J ,r J r Y N J Y 'r Y r t.r-.t.d Y N Y LS)Ln L.4 _ I r k r r r F F F Ia r•r F d .a F �. ? O Ln NN N ANN N NN'N N N T-T T C%m u W -C pa (N r r CA LA :41 LwW W W w:W u Y r•Y Y1.+ N Y w z 00 ;NNNN NNNN LA '+.N Y N Y tt O O LA I F j 1 W I w Y I O� Q`..a r.0 W W F O'0 0 O'O z y. Y N o.o O O.O L.^' CD `{f Y -. r►+ j r N �i Q` 0.- f+N .�D o o O o O r I Y 1 t 1 1 j 1 11 1 -i wr IC OHO'.i` rF.ww :r In oo.o N I{M-S 'N N N N N Y'.N Y N 0 0 0 0 0 1 i f 1 t - j I • o a W C m R R i .• .R f ;R R. rtl + � 1 , 1 1 1 r*• n n r R r • r rt r R r R r r r R r r w r R r r r } r v R .:. R W w W R .. R r; W r7 R �L �: • � R W .L R f7 W O R O } O R O } O 4 O U V R U O f O R U O O w = OD �"' R •• R r } r R o w O O o R o o R CJ } U co (> } rl D iV • u i f.) } G R �(. R �, uJ a R D: R. • V R - V V 4 n N • w Q• • r } U • r o R N N R R W N N R ry M z 1 �J 'K • O O T CD p o 0 0 0 o C) p p o o G U A N \ O O U O C. V U O U Cl G [7 On D W a a a w s JD m oc a m m m M y m a T a, T Q, O Q, T 01 If. P o. P m r•1 i z lf1 ' i N!N �D epi itA~ ..•r t O F r F N'N 0- : (71 A♦ w IN OD m` !�D Co r N N N:N O �D O ' O;0 O O; <0 0 W W i 0 0 N N VI w! ICi .p tn,to N W m 111111 • J • t} I • • 1• • • • • • • • • • I to • O O'.O m m 1 ID� �D iD i 14. O 0= W W I O O W W UI 61 Cl)m -P CA CD F : OO %D 00 0 0 r ! nn m al 0 0 M 3 a n c a w u V,H Y V) rl m c N N z Z to to C • • p � .r • .r •-I C c D ,� co O z n rn -I ¢ r c 0 G7 m n m m s m c c T T r w i z 1 v, o z z nn r:l r m -n z N x m m III U) I z ml j I I zz z! i f , M i~ i j - I x O: � C: -zi Rr; D D In f W N `M m' m eG z; to m I z z rn t m m m ktn c� I ►,; r; m m I C 'c c n 4 I r .O p� O j O NI O' O ON .p p• p i :D 1 1 1 1 n 4t, .P; F m �u w LA ry w w w m w w C ' 0 - I w toi .r r I ,z 0 0 0 O N� O' O O O D :O Ln 1 1 r N O oc Ln I 1 I i t � N f0 it r � ;• j i i z P' W v, I WI I I p j i '• W' i r� t , rl n r rt r R ► w } • w 0 n w rt rt • } - • • } } D I'1 R R R 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 m n n ^ n n' x x x x x x x x N Vi N W ui- G9 L7 Vi V, .v rr • r r r R r R -+rrr R r +rr R rr --rrr �rrr -+ r R W r R W R \. ♦ L, R � v L: W R W \L V. .i. R ' O O R U • U R O R W 3 r' W ... .iJ U G O O R O U O V R O U —p O O .O O O G O R _ a N N ► (.,1 R r • .� R .+r r r . r-+ .-..-. .. R r r �+r•+r .+r .- r r O U R R L a V R v r V V • F r r F R W w w W W W W W W W W Nn F F • G R U� R W R C::O O cJ R \ V V V ♦ l:V O G c, 'J O G O O O G 1. R n ti Z iJ T tl 0 C O 0- C O'tl O :O C.;O O O O G O O d C(73 O OC V \\ \ \ \ \\\ \ \\\ \ \ \\\\\\\\ \\ \ rn $ O O O O U G O C) U O c 0 ."'). O O C J O O c 0 Cj G G y \\ \ \ \ \\\ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ 1 \ c;, w m m m cc m x m m m x x n m m m x x m x x m x m m v mM m mm trmInm mall mr, mmo cr. mm olmmmoa o, rl f11 i -W N +o c ijr ! ..� t,•j y I w !z V�1vl) IL F!�0 m � D V r N I W V W' m P tl1 O W o N O N V NW O Lor— .D ,p O 10 0 a is uu, rF wW v o000o xL., wNm FtTlro-+ -+W GF r ¢ o .4 Ln '00 %.n LP (D In :00o,Go -4 ID OUIW PmOW W.0•O %Aw10 •" r PP o - •I I R I M'1 4 . xs s M m TT'TT mmmmj 000vo0o'o000 o Da :o n .,.» -.«. .anaa ccccccacccc c A A Q• -'V A A S.x A N co VI V) z 2 2 z.z z z.z z z:z m r In U)0 -4-+-1 z2zzzz z z z z z G .00 $ -rn 3 -r-I- -r-II-1- ---•-I m G z z A fl; a n a a z z z z z z z z z z'z m ' rm V>0 r! zz:zz z z z z c. oa0e1ccPc: crm W z m N m; D D:D D w 0 0 N N N N N N 0 V) :O 00 0 a �: • �Ax.'C. A Tsz +T - zxsx,s ILL_ i «+ '� �cccc Oc00000000.0 n mm z m 0U) U) U) 0000 = = cX-C t = cicCC s • 1 47 �i-i�l -i mmmm'mmmmmmm m -� ♦ • ;• • ♦ • • • ;• • • • • • I• n 2 2 i A i j A aa' c i vro;v o j z in i aaDD i I A AR' x ; cC;c c ' - i rn j r- Mr- ! i ? j c i 11 In N N!N { 1 i i Vi 2 ' f m � ti• { y«.t'O I-+ I y y N:N V),N 5 911A v1 N.V) Vl Vf «+ cc o I o A. DZDz !acct c c r- rr- cc cc c;c is -1 vv -V) c 3. i K-,.-C " Ivvvv vv0oioAvvvv!v v m -0 m rn;-m 'vv vv vvcroiommm-ov`v v 3 rr ; v ml I zAizA rrrrr r I Dr-rrMr- Mc)m n M FV M MiM :1-q ml-I s In, y mmmm rnmnn'.ammmmmm rn m V, V) V t D R D_4;). I V)V) In w 0 in►. .�H N:In N V)'In V) V) c, I c z z:z z n 1 z y; mumu I ^! 3ti: 3 I 1 T T-1 I i W, m lm -" m m ! I z 00 0 o cnLn,cncn !CD oao Q'ON Q Goa'G o a f -+1-+. �+ r m J+N N r►-r r+ r N r r+r r r r•+ r I n ro v r r F Aa it id .UFF b .0 P & rF 0 J. A ( O r N N W N W m m_m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N-N N j C -V r. W r r.Y.+1-+ r r r r i h- Y W W W1-'; OO. Ln '.N D Nr NN �a 000 O.a000/fl O OO OO O jP P. ! 0 W W - o O.O o ;F W W r i V Ln a' rr a' a' P T �.W P• ( :2 N r r N O=:C) O i N f-I- rs m N to N N •"'F-' 'r I i O -•►+'. I F r 00:00 'r•0Nr I W OO -•!NNr N►+ rN Q P. tT W k Cl O:Cl, d i F W 41111 -1 r— m P Cl,P F W R• N 1-- ! r • N o o:o O N►+r.�. r-''+N .9-1 N N N N is o i f i i i i a P • j R j wi •' n c m j • R R R: + m _Cep m n n n n n n x - x A v) to w w r + rrr �rrr -+r • rr .- -+rr r Ir - • r + r w r r rr r .D %L 'L W V .. W R u �L .:. J J R O R 00 O CUO GDO GO R 00 O GCi O O + U R O 4 O R U 4 00 R IV rt fV NN NW NN NN rt NNNNLVN N * N w N R N .♦ x * �11 � tir �. vti„ R C T L^ C u�O' P * rt r w W + C w C- O n * W • oOC GOC>CD rt -4r1 � ti�r1 Z • O G T1 C) OG O C-OOO C C: O OO COO C C O O O O G D V.- C? ]O C O u 0 :�l? O O U G U V O C. O O G G O D in .'16 zmS GO CD x OD ODSTmxm "I C.9 2 CF x (r OD OD 'U m m o, m o,IT, m I- 0.Cr m m /r. M m m CD o IT, m m m m T ri f j ! i i i i o S OD; III II f C CJI t" 10 'v N N N W j I W W` �N N I r'r i ►+r; r� -i V'V i GI W L4 N N'N C%%D Vt O m r N r m P; .N N I N N W u. A.0 1-•.N 4 I'D�D NOW i.11 N.W r N v1 4 .D o W W .1 C��D W w, .W W I T ON <b Du ;W W ! N'O A O O W 1J1 �0 O O.O O O VI V) r O o 0 0 tI V i CN Tr N vV ( tJl000OoOo.OtJS F o000oA N �r W W 'DID Lnv '�D�D CA:.O W I T ' r xxzzxxzzz xxxzx 7c z t C- X ;Q;Q X X ;v ;v ;D 000000 a c z a an -•4 aaaDaaanD r;rrnmmr'rm z o a v x zz S NN (n V) V)NNNN SSSSS2 M. D • z S3 A N N Ln 0 In V)V)V) V) z 2 : :C Z Z NN 1-, O O ;C o m m m m m m x `n n v) z z m z go P. c�wwwe.P. wzzzZ Zz torn z N N V)0V)In x c n O 3 O n 0Q) 00 COG Cc to00 V) Ln0 r n C Z Z C ac z Z C >L n -1 000000G 00 zZZz z C r H ! Z i • r*1 mmmr`Immmmm CCOOGO D N m n x n n n n n n n n n z z z z A S S 2 2 2 o v 0'.0 0 0. :Z Z s i • zz SS:zz xza Coco:0 0000 CD ! •-1. z tz D �� O� v� v -tim m`mm2 c' i to cn m i mr9 .+ r z z z z z z z z .M c, O i 0 0 C tit C C z :O O O 0 O.O O 0:0 0 i :D c CIC c-1 w' -per .+, C C C m ti � I m -0 -V nr r r -1, I 'O 'yam s I � �S N00N0 000 r V •r mmmmmmmmm I 33321 1-1 m m I ipn s s C7 m zzzzzzzz �D LCD nanC m! h N in :z a. zzZzr ! i c I z zz z I ^ I z I 1 I ( ! I , F II I I ' [4f 1 'O P 111 N N'N N O'0 0 ✓0 0:0 0 CD I- c O I O 4 O 0 0 .D 1 N f N� �.w N r 1+r i r rr�1..•. r .- N i t- f r- r- .+ .n A ! trrr-ArArF rr AA rF A, r - A r I! F FA O J N W W W W W C.I W W W W N N N w N W N N La N N N C O 1 0000;00000 .ON NN IV NO: O 'O O N NN •-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 li I 1 1 1 11 LP,N0 to rr r -•r I," r r Y F C I P tT 0 r F:C(f C+:Q, P V r Lq Wr O N r: r; 1 �N r I W :W 1- : A co WO T LJf W r W Nr N' 1 1 1 'G r F r r c r r r r I .-•r Ll. /W -+r ri P ,F i C• . r -.t+ ♦- r rC-.. tT P tr WrNv. A. r C` N I r ( N N r 2 - I N C - O I OD I C` I f 3 n � `* R + R ! rt • R D m n r r. n n C-11 n n. n x z z z z z z x v, v N Ln rn to Ln + r R r • r r r r R �r r r R r � R r r R R e r r R r r R R iii W '.[, R W W V] lr: R �[ �: R �r J7 • � R \: �L �: R l7 W , O R U R O G U O R u O O O R O L7 R O UI R O R G O O R W • W R w w U w • w w w w R w w R w w R W IF N N N R N m C� F R N R N r r r R v 0 O G R O C 4 U U R - R L:: G R F R Q t1; w zr V IL R r V R w W r H Z -ti O O O O mG' 00 CO 00 OO C GOO G a V. \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\\ \ m = o C U O C U 0 0 c: L x W x a, corn m al 00 cri a at xx a xxm x v m m m, m m LA o•m m m m. m m tr of m m,m m m i Ln N ` o � � z j r r NN W V N'r N tti:Vt V r N W '►' NN WW r r WV-4671P a, -1, Air Qyro coO A In VI, Is Ln ...r 671 r; N x r.m o LP Lll y.W VI I P �D L71 671 G O :O O m x m. O G O:O O o O O O,V O 671: in r r.Ln F v�t i Ln O O O O 0 0 U1 N O O O O.O O O O G W W N O.O m O.w N N I4 I R i R R R R R'. R; R • r r a' s 3 33 rrrr r r rr r rrr r o ►+ a a as c c «.«. o 000 n 5333 cc z r a m m n n n A c.l) w r to 6n N c c a z s r 0, r, r- . r" z o 0 n tr z - --i-1 -. r r sz 1 m b :h O S S x c v ao rr z x rA , • . 2 Z y A A r N y c 2 z' c ;r r f y y { m m n n .-.r-1 i C C �.0 N 1 ;;Q x Z A .4 rl f'1.'l I D w i �,.' '� D C C, V7 V:0 Ln m r ! r m ,' vv. zzz z �,.,►. i-1r i � NDN � -1 z z z z N I1F 1 V) IP a s n n n n hI m I N ( :z 6n 6n 1 v •• I c z co �- L) Z 2 i �ca l i co j t I f o Q o o C2 Cl C3 �Qo !00 im o'Co to n � r r r r RP 0rA.0 ',-0t W W N I W Na N wWUw Ww 'WN w 'tt) LA LA IW C w •f1 r ' Ln W LM m UM t7' -1 V :UI :N M,CD M ;.U1 Z 'o Lno �{{ O NNS 0000 X00 X00 .? 000 i0 - 1 r Q•. W I .-. F Wi LO r-0 W 'm F w w 'O ', r rr IP ;t y r' W N r r N N W w O rs tin LP r O mN; r �rr Nr r � :O F.WNr 4"-P W m F -W W m H N r' r r r N N L. LA o N V UI r z r r T; C f i cr'Ln v Lo a. a m w r C N N to 'm �1 Ij �• th ii r r r � x III j ( f j a P • • R R R ; R I 11, R U f rl R • R R R R R� i R D � R R R R R � R •. R G% x pt; x x rrrrrrrrrrr • r • r . r r ♦ -.rrr -�rrr �r • r r Q2 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 O R O • O R V O O R u C O O U O O O V O ♦ O S W W W W in W W W W W W W R W R W • U W W R W w L4 w W w w w w w • W m C S D:• a F!0. S. C O C C R • :71 • L7 . :.J. t • l i r�F P.0 F F r F R r n .i �, V v V V v v • r R �G a i- . o • C) �• C tT O 0`. T P oT • r T. n M C K • G G T C:J O O O n 0 0 CJ C• O O O C, o (j C O b 0 0 0 [: O C O n A V V V �I V V V r V V V v �1 \ V r r'V V V r V V "1 L7 m x G O O C co G O G, O CD O G Cl G U G _ G 7 O O C J O U C O Ci D 0: S3. GDC LD 07 C C C C C W GC C 2 5 D7 Or'S` a:2 W W GD T m T O m T m O•m m m m ff. ('.. m O• P n. m m D,O`• IT n, O.m T m r (!,1 iT rW 1J! PN W O W N W: V V ;- r r r V V .W W j W N V• -6 ,• •W f,N •;r W V 7 6 w W; •V V o G O n L- O� V.UI W r.F N —'lN M CO: F • ,• • • • • • • • • • • • v • • • • 1 :• • • 4 • • '• CD P•� ANCOG • • i I r'D 'P, 'z 'D 'D W C' 6NN ANN O� OtT wr Wr�V UI V:LP mU� tD k ODOF •D-4-4 FGF VN F' UI Ln CC I OC 7J co F t O 10 Ul r ID %D FT O O ON rrj ()1 S13 3 O O O "� A m • �I-1 y �1 r � � ti ti -y MMMMMM MM W MM • .� m 000.000 G 000 G m m m m m m m m m m m O ;Q ;Q ;a;Q,y w z A.,-p � c rrrrr:rrrrrr T c -� o rn rrrrr^rrrrrr .. a rI tt 'DTvv-0 r a C r S a s a.n A )0. 3. n nn D p m � r n zzaz�s� znz _ o p m D -� �.y -1�1�•1-ti ti ti-i Z v 2 A, r N V)N'N V)0 N V) V.In Z 0 p "I Q0 m M 4C N j j z z I z -1-y -1 -,1'-, �!-+r-1�j p { i m' N -0 m m m'm m m'm m CN;VJ C7 .r r i m m m m:r m m m m O O m m C I m ! D I C ? 7 D D O O O O O C C 3 I �I rr'rrrrrrrrr� ! r z c a o I cccccC:cc -0 m m m'm m rn m m m'm m m N n ►,� T T «. .. ►,.,..,w r ry r. �'� ! ►,' iz Q Mv � v.� Zvv vivwv;v-o-0-V -0 Z222ZZZZ22Z' -ti SSSS 2'Z S S = S S; R C7 � N ��►• A) 'ip 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O; C7 S� m m I .S as aA aa mr 2 S�2 3 2 2 2 'm l 'm Il i D j D I A :a . A 00 rlmrlmmmmmmmm c z I ., s zzzzzzzz ti m ti i rr-r -y-•-y1 r C; -ry { � i ' j I o 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 o n� o m o 0 0 :o O o:o 0 0 o a oo o n ' rrrrr:•+r rrrr r j r r '. r r r �rrrrrrrr n 1!. I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C7 F d F d r.p o a�F d F p i F F• •a..P A O W W "w w. W W (y w W Ip N N - w N f N N N N NNN N N vt C N N N N N w N N NN) N N N' �D n� w r r w w w'w W w w W r-r z k r r r r r r N UI r r W 'C` O.O�'�r F WL.r F-.i' -P, Z r N w N r:a 4 W N r'' w o rC r r r r r N r-•r r r: r o r D r r N V.O r N 0- Ln L. LnL. CV L, L4 r wN rN' c �. W G P�'K3 L+Wr rr r r f i N 'J i ,N r W-r N N fvIn i41 ' C-1 .c i I m I f I A Cl 1 r' 'D • R • ► 4 _ _ R D m R , •. R . R c o� !+ R r r r R r' F- R r R F- R r' F+ R r r R ►•r r r r r �n ,0 R Li W R R y fi �.; �' fi LL L • W W R yl ,i. iii W w7 CD C) S \G n ,L O R 0 0 0 R O U R O R v 0 R U U 1 U O R O G O O G O O O G = m F R - F F R F fi r!: R F F fi w W F W W W W u W W W W rl C, C` • L:U' U' • w u R N t -+r ■ N r+ • 1• .O rt Ct;m w S M m C W G n r R Z 4, W • r .r R C. ♦ v,U. R N N R F f R ;y CL 0,W LZ x n G < • 0 O O O CI a n 0 G U O G O G O G O.O O C7 O.O G Y V V V - 11 V V V - V V V, \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ N.\ \\ \ \\ M 2 O C•0 0 O o G G n Q G O U O C) C C+ O U G O C L \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ m mm W m W S mm W W a,m W(Lm Wmm a+ 0. W rr. o,m a, o, m m rr m m m m frm m O�m e.m m M 0, rl r: i N r f O 4 z N F W N N W W N h-•+ •+:' A i t� UI;. . .+ W Ln O o -N ►�r I W ,0 m W ,8 m O NW W 0,N, -W W N VIs i mm0 N m LnGUtmO. NO,��� f • • • • • • i • i - • • i • • • -• • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 • O G V O F N UI N O O V V O G O Qs N W NN O V F O N O F+O. o� •p W OO W F Ln z I OO OO P P O OO W UI m mm0 NNO 0000 In-4 V,0 R R I R R R R fi R R i R 1 W W W z L Z 'D I X00 00 j z z z z z z z z;zZ r1 mmm m m a -n-n W z a s 000000 t LC < OOO v D W -1'r1 -( W W W;a=x z -n'r1 -1 w W 7Ci •1-+I-+ i i j \\ C K s:ac t s ID m co .r0 r)n VI vl r) n m m m m m m m m m c r mrnm 10 r- mm r) C-) I .: r, InNv>Vlrnln rrr m G rrr n z r'1 ( 2x -1 -1 � -1 -v--4-i--1 z ( V?. c o o o m -0 o r -n L zrnm m'm mm O S rimrl D r OG as. C.: S X 7C A7cA rl rrr 0 •+ 0G KK D a - n r mrmm r n z z C C X z assss3 x G 000 i o ►r n nn 7c 71 -0 'DM m z zzz -/ I v -sx ( cntiv:rn0to A 1 !!! I X S. ? rl n N k 1 Z7 T T •r y.� H rr -i -ti-y «� O D C W W D z a Z a,Z b Z m'm m -i C r;r r 1 m r T T z z z 7o Z'z z x Q, _0 2 .0 v) .c.m ICI rl Ofmnm x'22 v m' aaa x rm mm H H N 0'00 m V)., 1 •-�a• ►r I i a N W W a�'i :a �1 D'�1 a�1 z�z z N z z Z ur G) m,.m m Ci m L mt m -� c za o Ooa o 0 0 00 'Nm I uldl CA CA rro �a W r+ .tJ.0 ail.0 0,,0,r r 0',ul r r� F i rAF r r r FF rA ? A f AFAA A A AAAA O N NNN (.+ r i'.. Uf .WW Imm mma% a, "I W uW :C W W.W ,n ,D w r r r r+ r+ i r r F-'• f ►+, -N;N N Z o ( OO O ` N ,D N r o OO ,Nr ,Nr N�"N�"' h+ rr ti 1 F PWh+ Q` W wr VI UI 1 GO ( OO oOOO N.h+F ;Z r �1+ W �' ( u Ln N A I o o I a o o-Cl o o. a ,D N i O r err i F N f rr N,O 0O 000 O0 O' r •-'Y 4 1 w Wr rF vo 000aoo NF �►. r �•r m I -� k ;W Ln f.. ! :o o I o 0 0'-o a o c.. .D N G E _ ';I 11111 _ I a o f V ,D i m I t I4! a m I � i N a R R ► R 'R �fi R ' In C: R i 4 -► fi - R R a m r n n -f1n - 'n 'n 7c 7: 7: 7C 7C Vj 7[ rr +r .+r %+r r R r • rrrrrr -• rr �+r R r'+ .+►+ R rr R r R r • K!IZ �L %C %L L: .L: 'S 1. '� R S' W ♦ W M n �: O U C:3G O O C::O O ► U R O O OU00 V O U OO R O O G U ► O O R O R x a U7 Ll v.L) U:U: L't V Lr R N R UI UI N U• U1 LP N L'1 0 Vi UI R UI L). V'U, R F F R F R m D` O O U O O G C O O Z; G r O O C,O • ,�, •,j, 4 C R C'+ N N R O O H ti O < • O O T por13aoro 0 0 0000c3or. aG ec 00 -C) oco o y V V 11 V VV V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V \\\ \ \\\\\ \ \ \\\\ \\ CD \\ \\ \\ \ m = O O r C: C,O L O C3 - O O O O �+O U G O O GO v U u 0 O y IG w y W .G W .L 'L, ... . IL W p= a w W O a .A OD [D �O CL C'S 0: p 0 y 2 p O:W D:9 O: L. m m b m m m LT C m m M m m fT, m m C. m m O•n, tt. C. O.C. L m.m m m m C Z ,F W r r 'N i C.) D� �N 'N 00NF FF .O ODNN NN' N .Uttar C A.Nr (11NW! •O S vV U, Cr, Li WA.W W� W rr .PWNNNNWNAND� V V WQ� D. �D Wry N U1 v)0', or .+.r1 .p W LN 100000000 N V O \x .0 Ln :D CD OU1v --r o vl OW CO;LW ON F .1-4 C0 0000100 000 NF IA:O% kD 0. C) 0 co P 1 1 i N Nw0U)0 NN V) N V)En (n LI)N V) N V)WN SCC V)V) nr) x � vvv �� �-D� z xsxsxxx o000 mm x= nn o C C C C C C C C C - 4 a D a D D D D C C C C m Ar)f)nnAnnr'7 0 7C 7C 7C 7C 7C7C 7c - � -tiy1 22 m o 0 0 o O o o x'z z W. m m c o r r- -0 'D 'Q 'D'D LCCC m -0-V -r m mmrimmmm mmmrl mm' Li L) V+ -I . -t mm sS o m C w N 0 0000 'C C -n C C. c+ m m m m mr l m N V) V)W r 1 m O O r r. c r CC CCC CC 2cc mm V)(A OC NN m �.►..+ n...'.►�H C CCC cc f") . r)n n n n.r)0 z 2 mmmmmmm smcw (n(4 V: W(A,E4 V) Yn.DD ! i rn ") z C CCCC'CC 'Qm N' CC.0 CC CC T 'D -0-0 i -y-y mm 'per' N SIH n )..•r•q OC n►1•-inNnH H H O rrrr ^rr �l ., rrrrr:rr zi'z� cc �c� oaf ' m 0-4-4 c i m m h1 M M •.1 11.N M m S m: w►r rr ►y w:M M i'� •.{'w At N M m m m m'rr,m.Z X. y m m'm m mitt r1 1 3 3. m m m m ' yN.N V)N:N V)C ►y � NN:V) V)V)�NN '92LZ Z I C V) C N N w 2. C C ~ - i z t 000 UO C.J00 - O 0000000 NrOO .0 p O 00 �+ : O b r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 01F n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 F r F P F A F F F F Fp F A A rA1 A F F F F :C F F F A F F .O W u w w w W U W N N IN W W W W W W w w W W W W N NS W W: 01 fr. - ' 000 00000 N O CDO OO.O O O .D O .D .00 NN OO O •.y I ' 1 FFCr. W W'rrNm F Urrr A r' N r N ryr'pj O v P. r r.N r r N r' i rrr r,F r Nor O - ,r r D�N� �r' � r I :• FF..W WW:rrNm 0+ O, fr, FWWrr Frr.r- OA FW, rri F .H NNNNr'O%CCNN r N►-'N Nr:y O: rFw `' :CnT F ' F r i r I 1 m V V c 10 i .42 a, R R m n n n n n r) R rr �rrr �r rr r rrerrr -+rrr -• rt r fi r +rrr-- r R -•r F+rrr +r R M'L KQ W J �.\: �r CL: t fi W IL: 8 �` \:: Z �L. �: �i+ R � rt V. �L �Li �.. fi J. 4C7 R O O L 0 0 0 :J O O O fi V O O o r4 U 0 0 O O r O w L:U U O o O O o U o o W R Ui Ln V.U1 UI Lr, N L Ul Ul R Lr Ul U LII U:V U, V. LP n R N R UI N U: U" I �l R N U: UI C.'1 U.N Ci.111 r, U.. R wL,4 (.N W Wwww rt NNNNNNNNNN w N R NNNNNN rrrrrr n w a, J, 0 T s D C, C^ C, L, w G, O•U, L)`• L, 0. a• LT U, P w W w O G O O G o y p 7 ' O o GooO GO OCG m 00o n 0CD b0 C, o O C1OO C) Lam! GU OG C7000 n v V V V V V -4 w rl r r v V V v V V V V V ri y r r V V v v v -4 V r 'y N \ \\\\\\ \\\ \ \\\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\\\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\\ rn 2 CG O G O O O 0 U U O O C) G O G C Ci 0 0 0 O O A o G O O G LJ C G C O O G D vl. .0 'U C W W W y .:. z IL: W 'L 4 X ¢mmmLID wmmmmwmLaw 7 mmmm m ¢ wcc ¢ m ¢ mm mmm m M m m m O, fT m P m m D, a• m O• m m m m n. m L7, n. m o,fr r.. Lr LT Cn n. m Pr, m ON rn rn M i II ¢ LI1rr0Nr+1 -i F L,f F N'r oz Ln F CD:N) N r r r L W it W W 1 N N N r� .r WWI W W &,. O r10 0� N;ON W W W W N -I m 0+.F F Vf F F V W V LT co ol r, w '�rl' D O O N ri r W O'.ON O -P •d O m LT �L'.N:W �D CO W ¢m tiL r w.F W-• 10 o r.N W d LIIOI N F O r Uf'r N W O �D CO,N V V,Cr, W OlI F 91 N N N W In Wm CD%D �D :o o o 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 O: .D O.O O D'W r 1 A A A�A A A A A A A Vl N N to N N 0 N V)0 V) ,N Ln W N 0 Ln� N V, Ln 0 V)In V)N r H r r M r•. .y.+^I CCG G C C c-C C G ti "�r K K "/ -/ 1-•; TI 'O mrnmmmmInmmm n aDnn CCCCCC K K K K K K K K K K r r r r r r r r r 3 iA z A z w w -n-nA A A A'A A S T.x 757C 7C T� .'9 N. C 000coo G.OGO 0500: 00: ¢:0.0 Ix m U) 0U)0 to V), DD': m -n -n-nTI-n-n -n -n'-n cccccccccc w zz 0000000000 IAA A A A A A A. p LA y N'.N N fA Cn N_ N.N -w-r 2 -r -•r f r r rte.. ►r •-1 O S =S Z 2 2 2 2 2 �. 2 2;2 • 2 D RI m m m m m V) V). D D D D D n D n D.D - m m 1'1 m m rn 11 m m f1l /•, D D D D D D C7 7C x7C 7< 7C 7. x7C NNNNNNNNNN 3 :ZZZ22Z .'O ;D _ 00 bOGOG 000 00000000 00 ----r- - mm: r'l or- zzzzzz M C) mmmmmmmmmm m'mmmmmmmmrn 'rn m rn:rn m m m m m m O O O O D O 0 0 00 ! c c c c c c c c c c D rl mi ( x i • :• • • .• • • 1• • • j ( I .r J C C c C C C C C C'C1 V7 N Cn V) u1 N N'N N V) N III w =07 0 071 -0(41 C Ic C Ci CC r •-1-ti -/r ti•ti -•L-ti-•1'�i C C C C C C C:C C C' 1 c r r r.r r r .T C n a-1-1'-•-1 •ti L-L►�r'r rr►.•n.r....h Z' 'D '0 9 '9 V ( .T O O O.O O 01 ! O �� r-i R•1 r�.•-1 H l rn rrrrrrrrr:r vv � vv� vvvv n I Ic10alc: cic)frnmrnrr ;z 1 :.,.,r ..►..,.. ..►+.� r r r r r r r r r r; a rl A'X n'1-.'.1-+►y A 1 (S33'3Z2i Nti �K O ►+•.L r ti r-1•-1 r/-.r-•.M m m m m m m m:m m m rn j > D D n n Di m Mr 3 A r..r•+ I m M m rn rn m rl m m m.rn j N N V) V),N N V)�Ln to Ln i►�'+ r ►+.••: 1-•; I �Ni rn O m m.m m ;N N V) N.V'.V)N V) V1 N!V) S ;2 Z 2 Z Z Z'-1 < -y.Z Vi 0,,,O 0 'n 4 r-r -, m z i 'W r 0 C) O o G o 0 0.O r r -0 0 0 D O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O In o C`., m w 0 0'.0 0 7s Uirr -•rrr —rr FFrrrr �r rr j r - rrrrrr rri WWA i F FF.r F F F r F F - F.a r F 3 A r d F F F -0 r Y F F F. F -10' W W F F F r O W W Lw W W W u W LJ.W N'.N N N N N N N NN N _ N N N N N r) W N m w w W'w W C r V rI V V V.J V r.1 r r rrr rrr r :W w w W w W r W W V V V 1i 2 `000 0000 000 O'.CD 0000 0000 L.n 0000OO. O 01 N �OOOO !-^I 1 1 I: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1' r -••C F W W W r r :F w w rrr G+ W O O F T'.T P 2 K'r N fl, NN Nmm FFrrNW Nr Lr I N 'NNrco ¢ r + OON N-N -• :O r r r r r r N r N N N r r r +N m r N r r r F N r; W N; o O m m N r•D (T:Q O` F F w r r F F-+�C F w w w r r � Cr •C W W r r r; W w o O C P:C � r Lo r N N r K)N N m..2 F F r r N w ry r LII r_ i N N N r m w mCD i N N'.N C i m LT I 3 m T Ln n x x x In V, to V) V) G f+ R r • r 4 r • �+ r ► r r ► r ► r r ► � 4 e r r r O R 'UR U R U R U '111 R V U R O R p O R V R C: U O Z x p R 4 R (,� R P R O (T R c` C' ► Y • v N.N mc �p ♦ N R U' R Vi • v. (Vl R 0 0 C R L R r F F Ci O R J 4 w 4 r R G • F F R Cl R F W R ► U''N r-1 M H U < • 0 0 'rt CJ Ci O C C+ G m [t U O 'O C..u'U l+ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ m x C: G G R, O 0 .a, x rl. S a) 0) w OD W a x OD L T (r. m P P m m m 0, 0, m P m rI m rTl i rl� Iry N Ili CD { W W I I �+ �. W O r rj! "N W�0' •H.•+ ! N N L. 414 I r r w..;�. y O O j • • ( O O OD OD' N N I a,1 I O O to Ln w%0 %O %01 'O O N,Ln , EN r ►I W W W W I �D�O 0 tT" T O O� O1 ON N N W W p P N (Ji O O O O I r :+ A t 0 0' 10. O M .9 m N N F A' v 0 •O j O O C=CO ,O �+r{ O O i V V C�P O O G CD O LA N ! N LA N'N IIt ! m O O OHO I ! 'l7 N N N L L C C G7 rC �C C' V) N W V, y r r m r r r D A D y y rr o r r r 2 V m L m m O m m m1 ( 1 C m m c -c -c K o c e m N G, p C z 2,i z 'r A O V) y -O :2 -1 C7 - n n. x ,2 m. y yy O G u D y C r G LJ m Q G G x ." m : m a 2 z z z 3 C-) M • O - r'] z ►, 1.., � n rim x I I i i 4 j ! j k' � i ! I ►o, r I ! I 1 X I b m i N It mm -I p zl �1N+1 s m i �m ►y+ ryr' ...,E �'m ;--nryi` m m m rG*1 .v! C/) z� N N� O U OO A 0l'' 41, N ! W W' rP Ln u N N W N NN C W r; r .P N LI•N' r J. A.F G `N ry '►' ! N W, W tT; U 'r !NOl -. 1 II 1 1 1 1' i li I 1 i 1! 111 ' r -4 41' F �! .• 'T 't r F t r N C 2 o 2 rl`. L; D ► R R R 4 R - • • D m T R ► » 4 k R R R C 1 1 1 1 1 M 1 1 1 i n n n r) r) m n x x x X x x x V, 0 V, V, r r r r r r r r rrr r r r r �•r r r r r V W cL LL C., W ca W W W lL Q C: LL O O U O O U O O G 0 0 0 O l.'� O O O L:,O O U O Li 0. m mw w m F w cz� m w O U LF Gc. LL Or.'� w rl C'• r r r .� r r a o c, o 0 o c o o o o o n V C' G. R W fN r o 1D m LL m V P Ln r•1 I..W N r r 7L n N y C T I p O C) O 'O 'C_U O U O O G O O G C O'a O O O O D V) O O n O G C,.. C> J G G G O G C• G G t'1 U J O O O D IL If. IL L W w m W m Co w m LF. m m w m m m w .z,m m w m m m ro o• 0, Lr, m m CT m m. m m m v. D, L,, a• m Ln t> )r m m m r1 1*1 Cc ID m Ln Ln I r r Ln m 0 ID F :n m a F N C C . . . .• r . . ... z I I o o W u I I -•Ut�p lT� r �; N N D�F N �- V i LJI N W� r O+�IT r Pm OO OO ID In rr rr 0, 0% rr TP, RF wcol O %D LnR NN F WO P N N O.O O O o 0 O G tT.tT tT l.tl w m R •.D Ln; N Ul. V V o 0 V Ln,N tT N W 10 4-1 N • • -► • • • • • t• i • • • • • • • • • • • I • • • • • • • • • ► • • j► ♦ • • • G W T Dl O O 0 0 O.O O G N'N C` C, W W m r Cr O! N N ✓J w O O C7 O U) IV v)V 1=G G c]O' O i0 V V OO 00 Oo OO C2O NN V O F F F t, OO OC O Ln ON OO Goo' O f 1 D Ln x z ro V) :G C- -ti V) N 0 O C> V) T i z O M 2 r1r'1 O n C •+►� r r K i z D D z m D W m 'S x 3 3 G r N S x ;Q 2 P►L� -4 a co 0 S O m r A cn V) N V, D ' I N M O L m x K S S S W V) c ti•-1 1�Y I x 2 2I C IN .D c 2 3 m 2 .z z z: Ln ,•-� t: r-•1 2 z n n n. .. -1 C) 1 m D D A C ti" " )-+ z C A S D D G O: G S .m 0 r x o :� .w n n. z n v c.c -+-i i a z z: a z 0 Ic 2 M.r. rl m c w LO r r c 0 In G _ D D V) L7 N V) rl n r o ro r.+•+ v: cn N Ln \\ I c c: r*1 a zz K -4 In Cl ; c nn, n a v n n In n N i C 'n S I i ro� r M ) i r►�' DD nn ool ro z :z ! C,c a s f z zm i I I .00 -1 :.a to n IM i-1 V) 0 0 0 Ln m N' .,r ro �-+ rl n U) ;►+ Iv Iv IQ to iX la o I ,v Irl r -+ c 0 c' z z a z o { K c Iy Ia om c o '•o ;c a !r x x x V c V -+" K c 1 x v m c T Ln ., T ►9 ►. c rt ri r rq -W ., v r ri ,r1 ., m-n 1x Im v m iz z x X. r -9 r; X z z� � -o a s i r Ln C N ' IQa i r ., r r1 n G m I s m r x to (T S rrl 0 r Ln Ln (n S m m A a w ;m 3 3 2 V) D N -�-•I D m ., ro% t c •• ro xI n M,"D 2 .T, I- CA -+ c -1 c aOa -/ as za S Vi IN ro i N m O i I O O O io O r r m N O o O 01.(r UI m O r C2, a L. -4 r r r z1 a,U, ( r WrI 'n Cl) A d -.0 F .R ? �F T u ..FRF F F �• 1F FF F F6 O w :W W N W CP :N W LT Lr, Ln VI N N N P'm m ON N Ln Ni c L,• •r :W a W Ln rrr r w r -+r :r r W r r; z O O -r N O r N O r .D 10 ID' O N O r :N r N LA: 1 Z GO 00 W OQ�1 . IF V. 'N w .v N r CO '00 r ON; W :r :r r r ► P. -• '.o N W V r r r 0CD o o N o Tj '.• ! 1 1 1 I I 1 ! 1 I 1 y I Ii I 1 t: I 1 1 1 1 11 R r W lT O O .0 0 '. W )N+ 2 O O [(! r C' 1 C W L„I1 1 W P I o ' V p♦ I � � N LD �Dj V 1 W %D I ` i V ' F� I ;• 1 r R r r r 4 G L O R W Q. W rl 91 R c -L cr X n r z -4 O K • O O O o D \ \ \ rn 2 G U U I- 7 7 \ \ \ G CC. a O ti r: i W ID N 1S1 r r r :r W O D1 W V W W oN N, c z i i �I i F �L' P� .r �F N N V V. V CJI.F N rCn W df'V N FD� F N 0'� •r' r r.. Q� D+I 'K r N W r N N V W 0 LI a W W O (n ON O W r UI Ln N T O ON In 0 L D vI CT0 0' CJt lsj O VNF.I -+N.Ln�D OOO �D C71NC11.W W11,14 r :71.O� UI.DTW 0 NW %b �D N O W V V' o o c OI W T O W OF O PO.W O VI OOU O OO W ON 00 OD -4 UI .1.O O% PD, C1 0 00 O - V T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T'T T O >D D -4 cCCCCCCccccccccccaccccccacc W T. 7c a z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z .. C D n n M z W W V.1 O1PO� 0Ul %A 0 0 UIP (A W N L. CNNN Nrrr�ro \ O W W r N +IM D M P In (A N S D 10 M r V M 3 3 LA N r I1 T N F.C.r n 3 a ...-.-1 -.. . . 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 o c o 0 o a o o c c c o 0 o c o 0 0 o m a n 2 D D D D a D D a D D D n D D n D D A D D a D D a D D D r z ri n r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r n L'i S. O � i i I i rn I ! z I I j c"LtoNr -•r;W W W V rte. Vr 0TAC x0nn c -1 -Do --+' 3 'S7I ►r t HD -1rt %D .D .DNr O.DV V'N'D ;9I.'7. D O 1 z; 3. .:. S Dm A r.. W': -y r-1•K O C W W W,( 1 1 1 1 1 W • :• n C'.S D -.W D D W z D V7 c. rn I rtz z m 91 v,-P;3-a D a a W -•UI S N rI .Z a A K r z.7C m C' l7 -i S i t M. O=A j S 11 rn" " = O rl h X : Mi i -I r r... F.Ir...ti -I T = cn 1 W z 0 " -O S .+z KrOTS333SSSrIN.Trnz CD C: mD -4,M r- i m m :O C «. . n z m r 'o 4 -1-Iaz Z z Wiz Sm �tow ri0 T. r •mT c c z c c c:c c c c cm o m a c Z c .. ow a- Mmmmmm m D ;0 rl C. O c) c:. r x . xszXczzom . m r r; r+l rl r,i rl m m —;z r- c' rn T z zzzz • o-aW m' c cn a rl*Ti W c r z -1 z iA N 10 W C L C to z O N co •-. Y rt Z rn vO r -r .T O W N 3 c i ►. rn c rt D z t ., z z K 2 A -. rn t I r s n i 1 1 1 n 1 W: !Z LJ C { 1 : W ID r. z N z C I 1 I 1 I r C c,+ c t _ r cl f i • o • I t , r � v n rt o- a R n m rt L' 1 , n x Lr, co CD OD Co Co Co co OD OD OD OD O O 00 O O 0 � o o w O 'op 0 0 H H H H H H H H H H W H H H H H W H H H H H H H CC) H 01\ . r c- �,D 1,0 �,D `D \,D \.D \,D \. \D \,D �,O W W w N N N N OD OD -p- N N cyl\ W O N N N N N N N N W N �,D N N N H W W H \,D W H w w H N -P" > w OD N __j O N N \10 \O O H H 0 0 0 0 W H N N H O O n O 0' O O O O O O O O w w W* F- � � a\ d\ O OH W O H o cr H O O O O O O O O O O O H H H w H w H N O O H N H O W o `< O O O O O O O O 00 O O H H H H W N I N O O H H H O H o O O O O O O O O O O W w w H O1 O1 O O H w O H o O O O O O O O O 00 O O H H H W H W H N O O H N H O w 0 W OD M OD 00 M OD 00 OD W CD O O O O O O 0 -J O O w O0:) n P) H H H H H H H H H H W H H H H H W H H H H H H H 00 H O\ It n H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 0 0 0 0 O O O 00 O O O > H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O O O o 00 00 0 0 0 n H .E -Ef)- Fl v, N Oo > O N W H \In 7 OJ W N 10 O H \D W W W CO H O � H H 7 \n i H \In �10 w O 07 C W N -P- �,D O � O \-n \n \-n \-n OD O O\ W H W N O N W -P'\n ',D O -� CO H W `n P- O> O N vt O 0-\ W O 01 ON,w \,D `n W \Tl w O C �D H O O \,D \,D O •fi• O O\ O O O 00\n 01 H \,D O O O O OD � H O N a\ O � O O O � O O O O O O H O O w vi \n O\ O O C] G1 O cIr z n � m CD c bd zn 3 CO n = tmj 1—+ b > - > (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D r• O (D C c+ H r• > .Q z O C) (D B B e s B B s a m m H b H. fi 'd m C] 'i c+ m n s C" r r• r• r• r• r• r• r• r• r• r• n c+ (D 'd H Oq 'd n r• (D c+ c+ G t7 c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ c+ p 'd H H 0 (D 'd 'i W (n •i Oq _Ir r• Cl) r• z (D M x' C7 b co ' C' b td 3 't d c CD (D O (D `G 3 (D Oq c+ m (D 'd m Cr? M ¢) (D (D H (D H H W �:s S= m m p m ¢7 c+ W t7 z z Ft sl n M y y c< H. 'i N r• c r• °G CJ > X (D r• > CD 't Ft C) 3 O m 'd W t-? N O � + W c+ (D c Cf) 0 'i C] H B " d 0 E; (D O (D O n c+ (D r 'a W ((D cd+ �W (D c+ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (� H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N -F' � W W W W W W W W W W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H O \,D 07 1 a\ V t w N H O W OJ d\ vt vi -P- J=- w N H Z O b b7 b C7 C7 H H 0 H c U) c) c = > H C H C t7 W L=J d m O m :3 c+ r• �-3 W (D (D m m (D �7 d W O O U) c+ B c+ r• W c+ x H c+ 'd c+ CI1 c+ > x C!) C+ C+ cG Cl) Ru H 'i G (D 0 M O (D (D O c+ Z r 3 O �l 0 W O W n O r-3 0 cG '< P) ''d � 's H H w 'i O W W w H Cl) m t� co CO z (D (D Cl) m 'd H. m (D c+ c+ r• I (D i d W ::S, c+ (D 'i c+ Oq I B I h co Cl) < c+ CO P) 8 �:s (D p (n (D M (D CO P) r_ x W c+ r4tt CO m c+ H 11 O m (D 0 W d• c+ � ((D P 'i (D (D x 'i P) 10 10 10 (D (D (D (D (D co W w C_ O 0\ co N -p- CC) W H vi d\ W ODN H \,o w W w Co H O � H H w O OD w N •p- \,O O � O \�n �n \-n \-n CO O O\ � co O 01\ O `O o v OJ O\ O N \n O C)\ W O O\ O w N w O �0 ! 0 0 \,O \,O O O O'\ 0 O o w D\ O 0 0 O t7 o n s✓ OD co co---j ---j W O I It � nON W F-' W F✓ c C i i i i i i d m s C+ P C+ m m m on p� r•'C O E n y n N C+ r• O a �-1 C+ 11 t� C+ 11 w Cl) C �-3 �-3 W O x '=J cn "i �i r• a C C-* C+n > m m _ C: + ° C+ m �_ r• C F-' r• 1.14n n tz O z n ti b � OJ W O\F- � O\.n\n \,n a\W N cD t7 N W 7 ---] -p-W OD G C7 W �1 WNN 7\,O 1 Vl Vl W W �" to C-? \1000 HWN col O - JOWO10:) GC'1 r 110 F✓ C� rn • c� 7 O C a. O �s MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Fast Tracking of Building Permits DATE: July 10 , 1986 Introduction At the request of the Mayor, City Council directed staff to explore procedures for use by City Council to permit the "fast tracking" of the issuance of building permits. Background On July 7th the City Administrator, City Planner, Building Inspector and City Clerk met to review past incidents of "fast tracking, and discuss procedures that might be desirable for use ` by the City Council in permitting a builder to fast track the building permit process. The proposed procedures have been reviewed by the Utility Manager who has indicated that SPUC has also experienced difficult problems because of "fast tracking" . Suggested Procedures 1 . Minimum requirements - No building permits shall be issued unless the parcel upon which the structure is to be erected is in compliance with the City code. If the City code requires the property to be platted no building permit shall be issued until the plat is actually recorded with the County Recorder. If a conditional use permit (CUP) is required or if a variance is required no building permit shall be issued until after the Planning Commission has held a public hearing, has approved the request, and until after the seven day appeal period has expired. 2 . Administrative Exceptions by Staff - There are three exceptions to the minimum requirements that can be made at the staff level after the plat has been recorded. a. Issuance of a grading permit. b. Prior to issuance of a building permit, issuance of a footing permit only may be taken out for an R-1 or an R-2 zoning district. C. A footing permit only may be issued prior to the Planning Commission public hearing on a conditional use permit (CUP) request for an addition to a building which was originally constructed with a CUP, provided the applicant signs a hold harmless statement with the City, i.e. : Howe Inc. 3 . Council Exceptions - After discussing possible conditions for Council permitted "fast tracking" of the issuance of building permits, staff is suggesting the following criteria for use by Council as the only conditions for "fast tracking" for multi-family, commercial and industrial projects : a. "Footers" to beat the winter freeze-up. b. To comply with the requirements of other governmental agencies. C. Projects dependent upon public financing requirements. d. Projects required to clean up from major accidents or disasters. It is important that everyone understands that once the staged building permit process is allowed ( i.e. "fast tracking" ) , it is nearly impossible to shut down construction because if it is shut down, the contractor may go to another job and not return for some time causing substantial losses to the owner and contractor. Summary and Recommendation Although staff does not believe that "fast tracking" should be encouraged, we do believe that there are occasions when it is reasonable and desirable for the builder and/or the City. Under no conditions would building permits be issued until the platting process has been completed and the plat has been properly recorded with the County Recorder. This fast tracking process is for the issuance of building permits and does not include the platting process, the industrial development bond application process, the multifamily housing bond application process, or tax increment financing process. It is recommended that before Council approves any "fast tracking" the appropriate staff are asked if there workload will permit the additional work. If the staff workload cannot handle the "fast tracking" project, Council may wish to deny the request or authorize additional help. It is recommended in the case of the "fast tracking" of a particular project that the standard building permit fee be doubled, and that at least preliminary drawings be provided before each phase of the "fast tracking" construction. Notice of any approved fast tracking of a project will be provided to SPUC the day of an administrative exception and the day after a City Council fast tracking. Recommended Action Direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolution setting forth a fast tracking process for the issuance of building permits-- to include the specific items as requested by Council, after discussion. MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator ,i FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer SUBJECT: T. H. 169/ T. H. 101 Bypass Improvements 4(f) Determination, Huber Park and Trail Corridor DATE: July 14, 1986 INTRODUCTION: Council action is being requested to authorize the submittal of a letter to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) addres- sing the impact to Huber Park by any of the build alternatives for the T. H. 169/ T. H. 101 improvements. BACKGROUND: Council appointed an Alternative Selection Committee (ASC) with the specific task of reviewing all alternatives for the T. H. 169/ T. H. 101 bridge improvements such that only the most viable alternatives would be studied in the Environmental Assessment. During that review process, the ASC considered the effects of viable alternatives on 4(f) (publically owned park lands) and 6 (f) (federally owned or funded park lands) areas. The major difference in evaluating the environmental effects on 4(f) & 6 (f) lands is that the FHWA signs off on 4 (f) lands, whereas, the Department of the Interior must sign off on 6(f) lands. Only a few alternatives had a 6(f) impact and consequently will not be considered further in the Environmental Assessment due to the expected delay associated with 6 (f) reviews. All alterna- tives with the exception of the "no build" alternative has a 4(f) impact since any river crossing will cross over Huber Park and the DNR Trail corridor. It is the opinion of the City' s transportation consultant, Mn/DOT and the local FHWA office that a considerable amount of review time can be eliminated if the attached letter is sent to Mn/DOT by the City of Shakopee. The ultimate destination of the letter would be the Washington office of the FHWA. In summary, the letter addresses the unavoidable impact on Huber Park by any build alternative and the City' s consideration of those impacts as being insignificant. Staff has met at the site of the 4 (f) impacts with Mn/DOT and the local FHWA engineers. All parties to that meeting has reviewed the language of the letter and concur to its accuracy. Attached to the letter is the results of the alternative review and selection process and associated drawings. Larger more distinct drawings will be available at the July 15, 1986 Council meeting for convenience of Council review. T. H. 169/ T. H. 101 Bypass July 14, 1986 Page RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Administrator to submit the attached letter to Mn/DOT. REDUESTED ACTION : Move to authorize the City Administrator to submit a letter to Mn/DOT addressing the insignificance of impacts to Huber Park by arty of the build alternatives for the T. H. 169/ T. H. 101 and Minnesota River crossing improvements. KA/pmp July 10 , 1986 Mr. William M. Crawford, District Engineer District 5 Minnesota Department of Transportation 2055 North Lilac Drive Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 Re: TH 169/TH 101 Improvements Shakopee, Minnesota 4 (f) Determination, Huber Park and Trail Corridor Dear Mr. Crawford: The above referenced project will affect portions of Huber Park and the Huber Park Trail corridor which are city-owned recreation facilities in Shakopee, Minnesota. The City of Shakopee has reviewed the project to determine if it falls within the provisions of Section 4 (f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966 (49 U.S.C. 1653 (f) ) as amended by the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1968 (23 U.S.C. 138) . For the reasons detailed below, the City of Shakopee has determined that the effects of the project on Huber Park and the Huber Park Trail corridor do not appropriately fall within 4 (f) provisions and, thus, do not require 4 (f) processing. We request your concurrence with our determination and transmittal to the FHWA for approval. Huber Park is a city-owned park which includes a football field, tobogganing hill and boat ramp. The Huber Park Trail corridor extends west from Huber Park and passes beneath the existing TH 169 bridge over the Minnesota River. In the future, the trail corridor will be extended east passing through Huber Park proper. The trail corridor is presently discontinuous with its eastern terminus at the Shakopee Park and Recreation Building. The Huber Park Trail is part of the Minnesota Valley Trail System. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) has an easement on the property under the trail proper to allow for improvements, maintenance and integration of this trail segment with existing state-owned trail facilities to the west and future facilities to be built to the east (see Attachment A) . The specific alignment of future trail facilities east of the Park and Recreation Building remains undetermined and will be at the mutual agreement of the city and the MDNR. The easement provides that the city may carry out construction improvements which destroy a portion of the trail as long as the city provides, at no charge to MDNR, for the June 24 , 1986 Page 2 continuity and reconstruction of the trail. The trail is still owned by and under the jurisdiction of the City of Shakopee. The Shakcnee Park and Recreation Commission building and restroom facilities for trail users lie on city property within the trail corridor. An alternate selection and review process was carried out for the proposed bridge and mini-bypass projects by staff from Scott County, the City of Shakopee, the Shakopee Downtown Committee, MnDOT and the Metropolitan Council. The City of Shakopee was represented by a member of the city council, and staff from the City Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and the City Engineer's office. Through this selection process, documented in a report by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. (see Attachment B) , 15 build alternatives were narrowed to two; Alternatives 7A and 13. One of the objectives of the alternative review and selection process was to ensure that the alternative selected for final consideration included all possible planning to avoid potential 4 (f)/6(f) properties. Where alternatives so selected unavoidably affected such properties, all possible measures to minimize harm were taken in developing conceptual layouts of the proposed improvements. One alternative (Alternative 4) totally avoided all potential 4 (f)/6 (f) properties; however this alternative was dismissed because it would not fulfill the project objectives of removing heavy trucks and through traffic from downtown Shakopee and relieve traffic congestion at the existing TH 101/TH 169 intersection. Alternatives 7A and 13 , which were selected as the final build alternatives to be considered, totally avoid impacts to US Fish and Wildlife Service and MDNR 6(.f) lands north of the Minnesota River. These alternatives also minimize effects upon Huber Park and Huber Park Trail corridor more than any of the other build alternatives. Alternatives 7A and 13 would affect Huber Park and trail corridor in the following ways: 1. Under both build alternatives being considered, a new bridge will pass over the future eastern extension of the Huber Park trail corridor. Under Alternative 7A, a new four-lane bridge would be constructed and the existing bridge would be removed. Under build Alternative 13 , a new two-lane bridge would be constructed and the existing bridge would be maintained. Both June 24 , 1986 Page 3 of these alternatives will include the maintenance of a pedestrian river crossing either on the new bridge or the existing bridge. Perpetuation of this connection is identified as an objective by both the MDNR and the US Fish and Wildlife Service in the Minnesota Valley Comprehensive Trail Plan. 2 . Levee Drive will be carried under the bridge tangent to its existing alignment in a manner that will provide adequate vehicle clearance. Retaining walls will be used on both sides of Levee Drive to accommodate the clearance requirement and avoid regrading on adjacent lands. The existing park and recreation building and restroom facilities for trail users will be unaffected, space for a continuous trail corridor will be maintained under the bridge and boat ramp access will remain unimpaired. 3 . About 0.3 acres of encroachment will occur at the top of the tobogganing hill northeast of the existing Sommerville Street/First Avenue East intersection. , This will require some minor regrading which will not affect the hill's continued functioning as a tobogganing area. MnDOT and the City of Shakopee have executed a Memorandum of Understanding formalizing their agreement to fund, design and construct the downtown mini-bypass and revised geometrics for the tie-in to the new bridge. No federal funds will be involved in these downtown improvements. Federal funds will only be used for construction of the new bridge and its approaches. The 0.3 acre encroachment at the top of the tobogganing hill constitutes a city/state joint development project impact to a city-owned park. The mini-bypass is the product of a long term city planning effort and has been a continuing consideration in the development of the park. For this reason, recreational development in the affected portion of the park has been kept to a minimum. Since impacts to Huber Park are the result of a long planned city/state jointly developed roadway and park project, we ask for your concurrence that this impact does not constitute a 4 (f) involvement. Any effects upon the Huber Park Trail corridor would be related to federally funded bridge and approach construction; however, highway improvements were considered in planning the trail corridor and June 24 , 1986 Page 4 have been accounted for in the City of Sr.akopee's easement to the Minnesota DNR for the trail. The trail has not been built, nor has a trail alignment been selected through 'the area to be spanned by the new bridge; thus, the new bridge will not disrupt existing trail facilities or trail use. Even if the trail were in place, the easement to MDNR specifically provides that a portion of the trail may be destroyed for highway purposes as long as the city provides for the continuity and reconstruction of the trail; thus, the proposed bridge crossing would not constitute an "impact" to the trail if it were in place. Rather, the bridge constitutes a planned-for component of the trail corridor and, thus, is exempt from 4 (f) processing. Though, we have determined that the effects of the proposed project on Huber Park and Huber Park Trail corridor do not constitute 4 (f) involvement, it should be noted that all possible efforts have been taken to comply with the intent of Section 4 (f) in the development of the project. The alternative review and selection process included an alternative which avoided potential 4 (f) properties, the build alternatives selected for evaluation in the Environmental Assessment are those with the least impact on potential 4 (f) properties and the development of conceptual layouts has been done so as to minimize the impacts to such properties. While we find 4 (f) inapplicable to the project, we have proceeded in all respects as though it were applicable to affected recreational lands owned by the City of Shakopee. We request your review of and concurrence: with our determination and also ask that these findings be passed on to the FHWA for approval. Sincerely, John Anderson, Administrator City of Shakopee Attachments: MDNR Easement Alternative Review and Selection Report L TRAIL LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this \S day of , 19S! by and between the City of Shakopee of Scott County, Minnescta, hereinafter called the "City" and the State of Minnesota, acting by and through the Commissioner of the Department of Natural , Resources, hereinafter called the "State," WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the State is authorized under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 85.015 to acquire and develop the Minnesota Valley Trail , hereinafter called the "Trail "; and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Natural Resources has, under Minnesota Statutes S 84.029, subdivision 2, the authority to enter into license agreements for the purposes of and ,upon the conditions set forth below; and WHEREAS, the State needs property to extend the Trail through the City; and WHEREAS, the City desires to assist in the routing of the Trail and owns or has under its control certain lands that can be used for that purpose; NOW THEREFORE, the City for and in consideration of the covenants and promises made herein, hereby grants to the State the right to cross the hereinafter described lands to develop, operate and maintain a section of the Trail in the City to wit: A strip of land 20' wide and generally parallel to the Minnesota River within the following described property. The specific trail alignment to be by mutual agreement between the City and State. A. From Shumway Street to Sommerville Street on the levee. B. Through Huber Park. C. Across the Bakken property as per easement with Bakken (see Exhibit "A" ) . D. Throuch Memorial Park. The purpose and intent of this license is to give the State the right to establish, operate and maintain an all-season , recreational trail for biking, hiking, cross-country skiing and snowmobiling. This agreement shall be subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The City hereby grants to the State all grasses, shrubs, trees and natural growth now existing on said premises or that may be hereafter planted or grown thereon; and the right to remove and use earth and other materials within the subject parcel of land. 2. The City, for themselves, their heirs and assigns, do hereby release the State, its successors and assigns from all claims for any and all damages to the lands through and across which the land granted is located-, by reason of the rights herein granted. 3. The City shall approve plans and specifications for construction of the trail and for any future modifications of the trail . 4. The State shall have the right: (a) To post such signs and posters along the subject premises deemed necessary and suitable to delineate the trail lands and locate the same for trail use; and -2- (b) To make such improvements and installations as are necessary, convenient, and incidental to the full enjoyment and use of the rights and privileges granted. (c) To police and control the trail right-of-way to insure that the public uses the same in an authorized manner. 4. The City shall not construct any buildings, structures, or other improvements on the leased premises , without the written consent of the Commissioner of Natural Resources except, the City may undertake construction improvements which would destroy the trail , as long as the City, at no expense to the Department of Natural Resources, provides for the continuity and re-construction of the trail . 5. The City shall have the right to enter upon the leased premises for any lawful purpose provided there is no interference with State's use of the trail . 6. The license agreement hereby granted shall be perpetual , and may be terminated by either party only upon furnishing written notice to the other party at least 5 years written in advance of the desired termination date. 7. It is agreed that the State shall , upon the termination of this lease, at its own cost and expense, as promptly as possible after the effective date of such termination remove all property and material which it has under this agreement erected, constructed or placed upon the subject premises. Should the State fail to so remove the property within 60 days after the termination , then the City shall have the right to place the premises in neat, safe, and proper condition. 8. This agreement and all of the terms an provisions hereof shall extend to, insure to the benefit and be binding upon the successors and assigns, of the parties hereto. -3- ,. Samoa •� N gig! � ILQ ••• ,1•Lf 4. d • � ��0 J C • / • O J • •. �"s� L c F . o uj LU Cc zt � a N I � ��t o 1 i I � ► \ 1Qj `I U Qj Li 9. The City has the lawful right and authority to grant these rights and agrees that the State shai'i have the quiet enjoyment of the rights granted during the full term of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have each caused this instrument to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF SHAKOPEE STATE OF MINNESOTA GRANTOR DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ,- GRANTEE J, By By ±-/ "-1,' Mayor --p Date 5-- Title Date APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION By �kZ- By7 D( Title�P �- . ✓ Date By y er Date -4- TH 169/101 ALTERNATIVE REVIEW AND SELECTION JJ N—:- 1986 Prepared by: Barton-,Aschman Associates, Inc. TABLE Or CONTENTS Paoe I. INTRODUCTION 1 Purpose of Report 1 Oroanizational Structure I Report Outline Z II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 III. IDENTIr ICATION Or ALTERNATIVES 4 Project History 4 Joint Partnership Considerations 4 Other Considerations 4 Alternative Recommendations 4 4 IV. SELECTION PROCESS B Development of Criteria B Rating Process Recommendations of Participating Agencies 8 18 V. ISSUES AND CONCERNS i B VI. CONCLUSIONS ?p j' LIST OF FIGURES Numtier Title Pane Location Map Fig. 1 Location Alternatives 5 Fig. 2-6 Final Alternatives 11-15 _ LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Criteria and Measures 9 Table 2 Rating Results 16 Table 3 Preliminary Environmental Analysis Impact Summary 19 us z Bemidji Mibb�ng Grand Rapids Dul,an US 70 Brainerd rj S:.DO, ..... Yrcnar MANN=A.POL;S i ST. ?AUL 7 COUNTY ME ii RO AREA .. :..::. ... . ................ ;.. e Rocnesre• :wt: SC Aloes Lea SI le, L OcCatio l E Barton-Asch:nan Associates, Inc. I. INTRODUCTION Purpose of Report This report documents the process by which alternatives were selected for study in the Environmental Assessment (EA) and the Project Path Report (PPR). It also identifies those issues which are to receive special attention and the agency coordination required to complete the process. The TH 169 project has as its northerly terminus either a geometric or profile tieback to the in-place roadway immediately north of the Minnesota River (depending upon a new or rehabilitated Minnesota River bridge crossing). On the south end, the project has an east and west geometric connection to the in-place First Avenue trunk highway alignment after a short (four to five block) northerly bypass of downtown Shakopee. The project's basic objectives are: to eliminate the deficiencies of the existing TH 169 Minnesota River crossing bridge, relieve the traffic congestion at the intersection of First Avenue and Holmes and remove the trucks from downtown Shakopee. In the initial phase of the process all known alignment alternatives were examined. The purpose of this effort was to determine which alternatives warrant further study and to identify those issues requiring special consideration in the EA. The tertiary function of this phase was to establish coordination with the agencies concerned about the proposed project and the corresponding study area. Organizational Structure An integral part of the evaluation of TH 169 alternatives and issues is the Alternative Selection Committee (ASC). The ASC is made up of technically- oriented staff members representing agencies with a vital interest in the study area: Scott County City of Shakopee Downtown Committee (Shakopee) Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) tAetrcpolitan Ccuncil Each of the above agencies has one member on the ASC, with the exception of the City of Shakopee, which is represented by a member of the City Council, City r Community Development Department and City Public Works Department. Services for the committee organization are provided by the Shakopee City Engineer with technical support from members of Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. staff. Other agencies involved In the process whose interests and input must be considered include: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) US Fish and Vlildlife Service (USF WS) Hennepin County Park Reserve District Report Outline There are six sections to this report, the first being this introduction. The second is an executive Summary Of the alternatives to be Studied and the major concerns to be addressed. The third section identifies the alternatives initially considered for the project and the degree to which they resolve the identified transportation problem. The fourth section describes the process used to determine which alternatives warrant further study. The fifth section documents the environmental issues and concerns requiring special consideration. The sixth section states the conclusions of this study. i II- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report explains the process used to identify alternatives that most effectively `+ . anspo-talion p-Dblems associated with the TH 1691101 Inte-sectio-, in downtown Shay:c ee t - p 'F i-s Avenue an�' Holmes St `` h ideas (nu,mbe-ed 1 thr ou h reg" In t, Process, 15 is pr ss, �-icinal t�mCOT provided the «5 in the Appendix) were reduced ultimately three. consultant with traffic for ecasts. =our differ to th Were used in the development different assumptions p nt of this data. These assumptions related to other roadway improvements planned for the area which may or may not be in place to reduce volumes at the TH 169/101 intersection in downtown Shakopee. The four assumptions are: 1• No other area improvements will be added. 2. The outer Shakopee bypass and CSAH 16 bridoe will be constructed. 3. The outer Shakopee bypass and TH 212 with the TH 41 river crossing will be constructed. 4. The outer Shakopee bypass, CSAH 1B bridge and TH 212/41 bridge will be constructed. The "worst case" scenario, in terms of traffic forecasts, assumes that no additional routes will be constructed and opened to traffic prior to 1991. F or that reason, a 1951 no build forecast was used. Using these .bypass trip estimates and zssionmentsI it was Quickly apparent that five alternatives (2 3 4 B and 11) could be eliminated. They oD not effectivel remove ^ ' ' r objective considered essential toe Y trucks from First Avenue, an enhancing the CBD area and to reducing conflicts i and improving the level of service for the trunk highway trips. Three other alternatives (1, 5 and 9) were deleted be they created specific engineering ` problems. These problems include traffic not being dire Plain encroachment e-� directed to the bypass flood _ n., vertical tical cl i a_1Dns o ' bypass, etc. r- alae* `• ( e`wd 7A lime i `• � between th,, bridge and the Four natives 7 an and 0 and ") were b a � study as two alternatives, 7A and 1/ ..D^^. +n d for further n 4. AS a result, six alter �HtIVeS, Which includes a cD nothing" altern e were ^ y ativ , w a=cepted by e Dr .•1 to COmmlttee ' 17 1,) f further analysis. These remaining !te- s w then 7A, 13 and 1, for.�,al 2 a _ _ a- �otive were ranked using the t a Object. , .ating CrIterla. I e=hnlcal me ^a a^g five o. the criteria. The asubjective esu, s w_. involved in all but Tive Criteria Were measured e rzting opinions .,,ade by by averaging the each of the committee mer gibers. The scoring of these alternatives is discussed in both Section 4 the Selection PrecesS, and Section 6, Conclusions. ' in the final analysis phase of the process, the number of alternatives was reduced 00 to three (7A, 13 and "do nothing"). After completing the preliminary environmental analysis, Alternative p' •- Y , t_,native 12 was deleted because of its impacts to 4(f)/6(f) lands and noise. Alternative 6 was dropped because of its impacts on historic structures and to noise and air ouality. Number 14 was deleted because of Its added cost to the city since the Federal Highway Administration would not participete in the Cost of a dual river crossinc. z III. DENTIFICATION OF ALTERNATIVES Project History The transportation problems of the southwestern metr000l;tan area have lona been identified. In the late 1960's the Minnesota Highway Department eno_aged a consulting firm to make a corridor location study for Trunk Highways 169, 212 and 41 in the Shakopee, Chaska and the Chanhassen area. A final report delivered to the state in February of 1970 recommended a new routing and river crossing for TH 212 and TH 41, a relocation of TH 169 easterly of its present location and a southerly bypass of Shakopee. All were very costly and environmentally sensitive. Although none of the projects were implemented, various stages of preliminary engineering have progressed and some project construction staging has been proposed. Although this project does not specifically fit any of the original project definitions, it does reflect an area transportation improvement compromise that will contribute to the remedy of the problem at less expense to the state. The interrelationship of these projects to one another is an important element in selecting design alternatives. Joint Partnership Considerations In the fall of 1984 the City of Shakopee offered by resolution to share in the funding of two state TH projects (TH 169/101 in Shakopee and the TH 101 bypass). The city offered up to $1.9 million for design, construction and/or right-of-way acquisition for the southern approach to a new TH 169 Minnesota River bridge. The bridoe work will be funded by the state (with 60 percent federal aid). Funding for the TH 101 bypass involved a contribution by the city to participate in the cost of detail lesion. These actions are documented in a Memorandum of Understanding between the rviinnesota Department of Transportation and the City of Shakopee. Other Considerations In 19E3 the city commissioned a Downtown Revitalization Plan. A major element of this plan included recommendations to oet through traffic using the trunk highway (including trucks) off =ast First Avenue in downtown Shakopee. This effort led to the development of some of the first Minnesota river crossing and approach road alternatives. Subsequently, other variations were developed by MnDO T, this firm, the city, the Downtown Committee and others. This process looks at all recommended alternatives. Alternative Recommendations Fifteen design solutions were originally proposed (see Fioure 1). These 15 were considered in the first evaluation using the P.M. peak hour traffic assignments which were developed from the 1991 traffic forecasts as supplied by MnDOT. r, The following summarizes conclusions based on the assignments. Because of these results, some alternates were eliminated by inserting reasonable cutoffs for the numbers of lanes which would be completely incompatible with the CBD planninc. For example, providing six or more lanes on F first Avenue could negate ma;o,- objectives of the CBD plan, be unrealistically expensive, etc. The Alternative Selection Committee (ASC) used this information to reduce the number of alternates. Alternate 1 This alternate splits the east-west volumes between the bypass and First. The First Avenue volumes are reduced about 25 percent. Two of the three heavy truck routinos are retained on First. Alternate 2 The bypass volumes to the west are high. Trucks from the bridge to and from the east remain on First and multiple turns are required of drivers to and from the bridge. Dual lane turns would be required. Alternate 3 The volumes on First are reduced about 25 percent but two of the three heavy truck turns remain on First. The volumes on the two bypass routes are not high. Alternate 4 The Levee Bypass has low volumes whereas First and Second Avenues draw volumes comparable to the present volumes on First, west and east of Holmes respectively. The heavy truck turns occur in the CBD along Holmes. It introduces heavy truck volumes on both First and Second. Alternate 5 The alternate evenly splits the volumes between the bypass and First Avenue. First Avenue has roughly the same volumes as in 1985. About half the heavy truck turns are taken off First. The existing bridge could be used. Alternate 6 More than half the trucks are diverted from First Avenue. The volumes are evenly split between the bypass and First. The existing bridge could be retained. Alternate 7 The truck and through movements are effectively taken off First Avenue. The bypass volumes are very high. Holmes Street handles low volumes and provides good access to the bridge from the CBD. Alternate 7A The bypass is assigned maximum volume. Local streets receive only minor volumes. Alternate B The bypass is assigned only minor volumes. The First Avenue volumes increase 25 percent and nearly all of the trucks are on First rather than the bypass. Alternate 9 The bypass volumes are high. First has almost no trucks and low volumes and Holmes has both good bridge to CBD access and low volumes. The existing bridge could not be used. Alternate 10 The bypass is assigned m2x;mum volume. Local streets receive only minor volumes. Alternate 11 The bypass is assigned only minor volumes. First Avenue volumes increase 25 Percent and nearly all of the trucks are on First rather than the bypass. Alternate 12 The bypass receives maximum volume. First is relieved of trucks and traffic. Local streets have only minor volume. CBD access to the bridges is reasona good. The existing bridge can be retained. bly Alternate 13 This alternate has all the good attributes of Alternate 12. Alternate 14 Same comments as Alternates 12 and 13 except that the existing bridge cannot be used. IV. SELECTION PROCESS Development of Criteria Before the 15 alternatives could be evaluated, a set of objective criteria had to be formulate. The criteria reflect the concerns of the public and the members of the Downtown Committee, City Council and MnDOT. Beginning with the first Downtown Committee meeting on November 27, 1985, sample criteria for evaluation of the alternatives were presented. Sample criteria originated from the city's Downtown Redevelopment Plan, meetings/discussions with MnDOT, Federal Highway Administration and city staff. These criteria were also submitted to the City Council for review and discussion prior to final refining and listing by the Alternative Selection Committee (ASC). Final revisions were made by the ASC at their February 27, 1986 meeting. The criteria and their measures are presented in Table 1. As shown, the criteria form four categories: CBD Planning Objectives, Level of Service, Cost and Ease of Implementation. Rating Process Unique to ' the rating process were two objectives which would serve as an overriding control in the alternative selection process. They were: 1) removal of the heavy through traffic volumes (par ticularly trucks) from East First Avenue, thereby enhancing the downtown shopping area and the trunk highway level of service and 2) limiting the proiect costs to approximately $2.0 million for the City of Shakopee and $6.0 million for MnDOT (assuming 8.0 percent Federal Aid). The traffic forecasts and assignment information indicated that five alternatives could not meet the overriding objective. The committee, therefore, was able to quickly narrow the number of alternatives to be processed through the multiple criteria rating process to 5. i Alternatives 1, 5 and 9 were deleted for engineering reasons. They either failed to clearly direct traffic to the bypass, encroached in the flood plain or exceeded vertical clearance limitations between the bridge and the bypass. In addition, because of similarities in alternatives 7 and 7A and 10 and 14, the most desirable �� bined for further study as two alternat features of these alternatives were coives, 7A and 14. As a result, five alternatives plus a "do nothing" Option were to be considered for final selection (see ALTERNATES S=LCT=D FOR F URTH=P, ANALYSIS, Pages 10-15). In considering the selection criteria, the ASC Was aware that some of the criteria were clearly more important than others; however, because of the large number of criteria (20) and the overriding weight given to the two basic project objectives, the process worked well without adding a weighting scale to the rating system. The decisions of the ASC concerning the subjectives criteria (opinions) were tallied and averaged for each of the possible alternates and combined with the technically measured criteria ratings as shown in Table 2. Using this sheet, each alternative Was rated on a 1.0 to a 2.0 rating system. For each criteria, a score of 2.0 indicated that a particular alternate fulfills a criteria well and a score of 1.0 indicated an alternate performed poorly on a particular criteria. Before rating the subjective criteria for the alternates, each member of the ASC was given similar quantitative measures interpretations and asked to measure in their opinion the relative performance of that alternative against each criteria. 8 TABLE I. Criteria and Measures (See criteria and measure Iist for full description) CBD PLANNIN- OBJ�CTIV�S 1. Enhance Retail Core (Noise/Air) Distance from the through 2. Provide Future Development roadway to the CBD (1) �' Acreage remaining for new Options development in downtown 3. Increase Parking Acres of land suitable for parking divided by distance 4. Attractive Circulation System to retail core N o of pedestrian 9rr�ri'Gr'ri�feb -`im-ear measure Of streetscape 5. Improve 2nd Avenue Retail Street Relative volume assigned to Second Avenue for each 6. Access/Visibility to Mn R. Valley alternative a Trail Head Opinion 7. Preserve Mn R. Scenic Opinion Recreational Amenity E. Minimum Disruption, Senior Center T:•affic within 500' of 9. Senior Center Access to CBD building Gpinion LEVEL OFF SZRVIC: 10. Accommodate Through Traffic Travel time times volume for the 3 major movements 11. Remove Core Area Through Traffic Degree to which through trips are diverted from 1st Ave. L. Maintain Access to Retail Center Percent of trips 13. Convenient, Safe _nt,ances inconvenienced to Downtown Opinion 14. Efficient Circulation System for Core Retailing Opinion 15. Improve Through Traffic Level of Service Level of service calculations 16. Minimize Ped/Vehicle Conflicts for TH 169 and 101 Reduction in traffic on COST 1st, 2nd & Holmes 17. Minimize Construction Cost Preliminary cost estimates 18. Minimize Impact on City for each alternative Well #!/^Iectric Degree of impact (2) 19. Limit Construction Cost City $2 M 'L�•�,�- '3- I4.s;3�_1�_NTATION State Sa M. 20. Minimize Detour Volum times extra travel distance times construction time C1) Close, Far, Ground Level,1, A D„p.re seed (2) None, Minor, Sionificant "..__. y 9 =-AIi7NU3177V Z =_i (ns1-4 �,-�.� =--�;-.\^• --_-_ .rte -�_ �-"', _. _ _ �� \ �' �•�•c. —('^"� ,�-� .'.�,\. ��,, , ,,_,;�--�---ter-.:� � nl .�,.� •_ .- � IM '�Cat� ������.�/��\�.� _.y,�_'- ' ;•.c.c.`1-` !I llM,..�fes. -�• - ��_--c✓- �� !-q ,.,_�_--`� U - r /y�� \ `--moi, •� /. ,\�-.�� _ � 1. f,. • Y/MVF :L IVFR 77 .,�.`__� .. vaa`.�'• � �_rat i'YI`3�1 �nr:'3,. Ti^ �52 ^�`�- ' FIs: h -_j •,��-,��' i "',�L�ti.-��\.�„'-'r �7_• �—*`'r` � i •J� ! i s•, ..:✓ ,...” -'mac'-,.r..�� � _ q L •rA. •N ' !TAO v L Ls —� E)',-7 ' 1 L ` ' FjGUy�ALT=Ri ATIV= 7A .ort _r.1 -It•�, / ���� '..• I 1~\ � 1,11 4 - i'L-�``� / I ��Sora rnv£R w Cr • 111 .�� ..� "1_ =��. [^.�.��fes._ - �- �` �...-t=`` t#'.r�0 i( ��� •/A•'•� •• `•Tj�.r.-. I�;-ems � .,i�,,.��•/�'----�—. J.i..�� � I��� I i �-� � �U_ -_� FIGURE 4 ALTERNATIVE 12 c RIVE Or PIo4. all I��1 \�,4/ •�_- '� �.. Jj e Y,V so7,'. IVFR wt `--mss '�� `'� /l �Y�_ a \ I I 1 I I.�' ��� ��`�� ���1`• _ ,.�,1 l ISE=' • IS! -E -17 _����-' `---�` c` •,rel `� � ,� r ',1�I \�1� �t�'\� �"i°`'�i _^•��_��..��I^.` _ _ _"�'c�� �__moi'�^'� - rllaUr ALTERNATIVE 13 ;rte =1 •�: Y 1 71 i ' Y 1I,�SOTd RiVEF' \ � N r .•l L.l( K,1� Ills —•1.aR:..M ... � —��— ——�_ _? �ter- +� �� \1 _ Y � • FIGURE 6 ALTERNATIVE 14 FINAL ALTERNATES SELECTED FOR FURTHER ANALYSIS J W ^ I N I N I N I N Nt= I ^ I ^ ( ( N I N I ^ I I I N I N I I N I ^ 1,' C W RR w J Jr� Z ^ I ^ R cv F- 1 I I I I I O I N N I N I ^ ( N a) I N I N I N ( N I N c m CD N m I m N I N N c l N I S N N ^ i CD I ^ I I N N CD C N ^ N N LD ( jc CD C < � ^ N N x N N C tD NN L-1 N N D lt7 I I I N tV CD I N tD N I tD CD I I ( N I ^ I IDI < I N I �• I N N ^ I }I ^U } O N I ^ ^ I N N I N N to C14^ ( � .CD ^ i N U L � _... N I ^ I r ^ I ^ I N II � ^ I ^ ( I ^ I N N I N� I ^ I I IC� I CV N I c I N I O N T — O _ G - o tv y +_ - c Q < E f L fJu^_> .7 —3 JC �> 2� OL JL >— W n G _W > u D V _ y _ < U U N_ V V > C ^ _ J J V - ^ LJ _ Li _ D = < _ <— _C t L to G _ i �'=c buwurid LIZ:) aDIAJ2j JO iana� 75C�• - � 16 The criteria rating scores will be considered in the selection of the final alternative. Recommendations of Participating Agencies Concerns and recommendations of the public and participating agencies which are incorporated into the rating system include: - o Citv of Shakopee and Downtown Committee: 1) removal of heavy through traffic and trucks from First Avenue and Holmes and 2) limiting the project costs to a city share of approximately $2 million. D MnDOT: 1) concern for through State Trunk Highway user traffic, both the level of service and circuity of travel and 2) limiting the state's share (including federal aid) to $8 million. This includes bridge construction and roadway approach work considered essential , to provide reasonable connections to the in-place trunk highway facility. o Federal Highway Administration - Policy and procedural requirements associated with the use of federal bridge replacement funds (e.g. rehabilitation and/or reconstruction standards, participation requirements, environmental considerations, etc.). o Other public concerns will be considered during the course of making the project environmental assessment and with the, offering of an opportunity for public hearing. 17 V. ISSUES AND CONCERNS The alternative review process revealed a number of important concerns. First, declining resources and the number of high pricrity projects competing for these funds dictate that construction design consider the most cost effective proposals. Because the in-place TH 169 bridge over the t✓innesota River is in relatively sound condition, every effort should be made to incorporate it into the final improvement plan. However, structural limitations prevent adding lanes to the existing bridge. If the existing bridge is used to carry one-way traffic as part of a twin bridoe design alternative it must be rehabilitated to the decree that the FHWA can be assured that it will provide at least 15 years of service. Based on the information available, implementing the project as proposed in any of the final alternatives will not necessitate a State environmental impact statement under any of the mandatory criteria listed in Minnesota Rules 4410.4300. A federal environmental assessment is required; existing information that the environmental assessment process is unlikely to uncover significant environmental impacts and that a finding or No Significant Impact (FONSI) will be the result. Recognizing that the Fish and Wildlife Service and Minnesota DNR owns extensive parcels of land along the Minnesota River, every effort will be made to avoid a 4(f)/6(f) lands exchange delay. With the narrowing of alternatives, the environmental assessment is moving forward as will the Project Path Report preparation. The Alternative Selection Committee (ASC) will remain in tact during this period and serve as a review body for these document drafts. Both are scheduled for first draft completion in June of 1986. 18 C1 M/ TABLE 3 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IMPACT SUMMARY SH41<0717-7 BYPASS Alternative Criteria 6 7.A 12 13 14 AIR QUALITY: Exceedances of: - MPCA 8 hour standard; 5 of 9 0 of 4 1 of 5 0 of 4 0 of 5 - MPCA 1 hour standard; 0 of 9 0 of 4 0 of 5 0 of 4 0 of 5 (per numter of receptors modelled) NOISE: Number of Receptors to Experience 3 dBA increase in - L noise level; 2 1 3 1 1 - L50 noise level; 0 1 2 0 1 Wz--TLAND/SHORELAND/PROT.ECTED WATERS: - Acres Wetland Affected; 0 0 0 0 0.5 - No. of Protected Waters Affected; 1 1 1 1 1 - Acres of Shoreland Zoning District Affected; 0 0 0 0 0 FLOODPLAINS: _ - Longitudinal Encroachment? No No No No No - Sionificant Encroachment Under FHWA Rules? No No No No No 4(f)/6(-1) LANDS: - No. of 4(f) Properties Affected; 1 1 2 1 3 - No. of 6(f) Properties Affected; 0 0 0 0 1 HIST ORICAL/ARCHAE OLO�--2ICALRESOUR CES: No. of Archaeological/ Historical Sites Necatively Impacted by R.O.W.; 4 0 1 0 0 RELOCATION: - No. of Residences to be Acquired by R.O.W.; 6 11 4 11 11 CONSISTENT WITH LOCAL LAND USE PLANS? No Yes Yes Yes Yes THREATENED/ENDANuERED SPECKS: No. Species Potentially Affected; 0 0 0 0 0 F PPR F ARMLAND: - Acres Impacted; 0 0 0 0 0 VI. CONCLUSIONS A deliberate attempt was made in this analysis to consider all possible alternatives for the south TH 169 bridgehead and all options to reduce specific problems. As a result, the "first level evaluation" procedures were adopted. The initial evaluation requires less precise data and permits consideration of a wide range of alternates. The strong advantages of this approach are that it considers all realistic alternates and eliminates options on a consistent basis. It assumes that all alternates are equally desirable until serious conflicts with the design objectives are identified. Alternates were deleted by the Alternative Selection Committee (ASC) as it became apparent that a particular option had almost no chance of being the preferred alternative. The intention of the "first level evaluation" was to eliminate the least promising alternates, allowing the remaining two or three to be analyzed in much greater detail. Alternates 1 through 5 and 11 were deleted for further consideration while alternates 6, 7A, 12, 33 and 14 were included for more detailed analysis. The reasons for deletion are summarized on pages 6 through 7 of this report. Preliminary deletion of alternates was due primarily to an inability to remove traffic, particularly trucks, from downtown streets. This inability affects redevelopment plans and creates indirection and delay on the trunk highway system. Alternatives 6, 12 and 14 were deleted in the final analysis phase of the process. In April of 1966, the ASC deleted Alternative 12 because of the negative implications revealed in the preliminary environmental analysis on 4(f)/6(f) lands and noise. Subsequently, the committee dropped Alternative 6 because of its negative impacts on historic structures and to noise and air quality; and number 14 was deleted by _ City Council action because the Federal Highway Administration would not pa.t:CipatB in the cost of constructing a dual river Crossing as required by that plan. The remaining most viable alternates, 7A and 13, were recommended for final consideration by the ASC with the option that features from other layouts be incorporated, if necessary, to satisfy design requirements. In conjunction with finalizing the Environmental Assessment, a Project Path Report will be prepared which will include a further project discussion and make recommendations on a final alternate selection. IL___ W � h C 11 E 11 I ..- __JL ___JL__JL +� �IM371 r LLI -JL__J J 3n Z::.nr I(II _J L 11 Ilui IA •• '�1• QI OJ v • 1 r O tf•'00 v.�• 1 r '�RR G -_ V C) L IL-_ J L LL J - jO n II _ � b••i. 11 -I I II h+c�h II _- 11 � 3'.l c3nn � � �' lTll o3n1j$ � ii lil�b 3nn�+r,b E 1/ E II II E II II _JL JL__JL �IM3l T / i 11 1IM3�i JL__JL. the CD CC ti31? a WL- -d31�n! Wlr- 'IW rWll _n ,I Ilyll � I I 0D MI• 7 IL_ 11 IL-- J L — _ 11 i ri al e3nn S W !' 1llAcynlY 5 �� l lean✓ip$ LL E > II > E II II E I It p z --_ J L- _ JL 1,1 �iM31 { lC\'\ II 15iM31r• ',il �IM.31r y II — II �3w1D_1 the 'Tl 11 i t LII t 'I L " �� _1 e311 i till � b31�Rd II � e3i1(!a � Wtl _ ffl 1,, ,,,II - 111'i1 (7 GJ MJ• ^ —u� N.1• , tU • tr Ido ml♦ 1 r O IL ` ri c > r^ 7=-3n-�nD$ E I 1I 11 n 1. z _ � :iIM•3 i� 1 ii iSIM3?'^ f t I I� .DIM3,; i, a3n ivl I SII t 11 I 1 cl1ZI tee11 I:, "LII r ``1 L c311hIL`_ - 4> r = 11 II 1 M - -�L k_IL- = __J L -11 - I I N -oo WI 11 r ,, r-oo M.i: r m=- --_�r OD n•j• U IL-- ___JL IL-- - --JL tr- IL__ __JL ... -- �n3� C '� a T e3nryp5 W J' J L. e _ J L__J L. o% 11 > � � 3151Ak3nr1D5 4„ - 11 E It F ii i =JL rsIM.31r" IL If " 11 J J L er. tr� - t.• 6 _ 0_I I ti:" I 53w�p^f 4r ; �J M.l• O Ir-C,T1• O I a•�• �r � �1 r`Q MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk r✓ l RE: Application for Sunday Liquor License by Clair ' s Bar Inc . DATE: July 14 , 1986 Introduction and Background Clair ' s Bar dba/Backstretch Bar has applied for a Sunday Liquor License. The establishment already has an on-sale and off-sale liquor license. In order to qualify for a Sunday Liquor License, an applicant must meet the definition of a restaurant as defined in the city code. The terms "restaurant" means any establishment, other than a hotel, 1 . under the control of a single proprietor or manager 2 . having appropriate facilities for the serving of meals 3 . where meals are regularly served at tables to the general public 4. which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service to its guests , and 5 . which shall have seating facilities for seating not less than thirty ( 30 ) guests at one time Alternatives a. Approve, if Council finds that the establishment meets all of the above definition of a restaurant. b. Deny, if Council finds that the establishment does not meet the definition of a restaurant. Recommended Action If Council determines that the establishment meets the definition of a restaurant, move to approve the application and grant a Sunday intoxicating liquor license to Clair ' s Bar, Inc. , 124 South Holmes Street. JSC/jms mE nu BACKSTRETCH BAR 124 SOUTH HOLMES SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 445-9948 a � P- Izza s SMALL LARGE CANADIAN BACON 2 . 65 3 .80 F SAUSAGE 2 . 30 3 .40 PEPPERONI 2 . 30 3.40 SUPREME 2 . 65 3 .80 SAUSAGE & PEPPERONI 2 . 65 3 .80 Sandwiches- 1/4 LB. CHEESEBURGER 2 .00 JUMBO CHILI CHEESE DOG 1 .75 DOUBLE CHEESEBURGER 1. 70 ROAST BEEF & CHEDDAR 2 .00 CHICKEN & SWISS 2 .00 TRIPLE HAM & CHEESE 1.85 HAM & CHEESE FRENCH ROLL 1.80 SUPER SUB 2 .00 SUPER POOR BOY 1 . 75 CHUCKWAGON 1 .65 BBQ BEEF 1 . 50 CITY OF SHAKOPEE INCORPORATED 1870 129 EAST FIRST AVENUE, SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650 July 11 , 1986 The Honorable City Council City of Shakopee Shakopee, MN 55379 Mayor Eldon Reinke has notified me, Judith S. Cox, City Clerk of Shakopee that a Special Meeting of the City Council will be held at 6 : 30 p.m. on Tuesday, July 15 , 1986 , in the Council Chambers of City Hall for the purpose of convening in executive session to discuss pending litigation. Sincerely, Judith S. Cox City�'Clerk JSC/jms The heart of Progress Valley 4N F(�f 14 /'1 o O()C Tf W 1TV FARO!nV= D �� ^.a n S �,o�� ow 'IV o .yam "w a W c a �� y (Do v'� ti - o'er O ID5ow �oa�n `CpK' o � �� a �.o (Dy °; mow �'� � (D � ww � D .°, o � � a � ao�� xoc�aoa �'°: w ,(D F� ('D NO �' co o o yr*� w 8 o Ro �p y c~' o ® 8 (Co`o F-y'' O e 0 � C °c ti0v � � �ow5 � c� �8�pp0 � ry(op (D0 -y y 8 cD o eD (7 CD :�. c o r0 z�c o b o o ti n a k� � R w m w w ti o 3 v,w C7 �-O c�w o coCD w n ID O W C lD O n.e-r �C tl/D� O"CD �+' �((DD �'Y7 "S ew•r� y ems-' y '"f' C "' !n O O o n' t9 .7 tr•J w .C r O y A',".�w ami O rr � w C (D O a'`8C •O",(p C t�� y n� a8 �cyyo (� a- .("o ff a (]�j (o �`� aQQ ((o �p .7 8 �p O �y w .y O pr(D (CDS _(DD :I<i.... C CD L, wn R P. pr O .., '�! mr N °' C C . CD w CD R.o ti on. O O _•M J �. a r7y �pcp c o �� �0 T w m �^ w �•+�p ., CC„ (D p �C e•."' fD C O R ID w '� (D a(D (D (P �' y r- OM C (�D �+`"' w `' a" ti A o /o�. y�j o•4 ti 7 =% i ��aoa 4 'rC o• p �,•o (o �'c� _ti =pa.'W O w cb 8D 'l-DD °�'.J'a!D r* in co co ;*R w '7%�in.m tv 8 ti Q - C oao `� moo' b co cn o o n �o o' cow tiJx�.S niw y °i O ] ° w 'Ucn w C b w » r...,G o r*x 8 -1 CD � �� r � 'Do �'w C4,o�, ow otiwy �c' ® �5 'U17Cya w CD w . _= F 2 w 0 w y�� � w Q -005 �' n `° c �� �+ w$ o a c 5 xo 8 $ac o 5 bad $� d o �'.�y o Q �"'o.co n �a co n 5c- ❑ sR cD w w ti Ct'C '-.(D 4.:. lD b o O a o•' O n e-' IDD m - w n C n,o o wm va, „ c;w•y °:(8„0 .°c c�o co (o $ o p)--i cgs C.. ....._C•w fD v, '•i y p 4 0- (D n [n .. 'tJ,W IID (D rr n d +n �j (D '7 :y"lD O aq O "'( n e�-r'O y , o`C 6 h e+.. S•w h rya 't (D(D CL �.��awa —0, w �, •, $ ,, o.a� n N �$ �aq o $ ao o X o c o o a �b D o $ �' v �c w (�o $ �'o O ca �•� c caoaa o w a w o y cia co A b C o o $ W r oc (D (D N „y fD ,C.* fyD O n• .•.,-^'"' CL b w p C O�c-.C-.w $�(moo 5-�• C ,C rn o'� m o �- 5-$ o m w cab (D w o �-. ^_+ _c ab �'a a c o En O cD O"b_Q.rr R a o•eo 8 O CCD p a a o C. 'Y O o < p.(D (D 'y O .:. �•w A' (D pCq C7 w ew•�dU a.`Cc"�c�o � o �� y a s(Ro � w a D � G w o a a.a.aa o f3 n o 0.-U-q 0 � (D O [9 a °i�,�C a C. w�•� 8°1'-f°•_,r... �( w O CD (Dw CDwtia - n " aa � " coo w a 0 - (a°o (-°a ova sD " In..t3 b d. �-•' .'� y .y G w Fii W p"'8 C W .('-. " ""`n C• Cr p mcC n' _-v CD. CCD O p• w'Phi a0i Q O VCi a !D D, `c cn•.-- is R W '"7 R Cyp _� r,; y (CDo in � roi 8wc �q ��--11 few °'_ ' ycf" C�w � ao � � w �� c�owCL (mos�' doo rypF~" 'ti p (� o o mid � w '� o-w :� � ❑ m �'v co w � C+'p R ti �- Q o r. of-5 ® w a c � 0 Q. � C v' C• 5 b C p (n w w OO w O Q O c.Gl.(DCD y (o C IID ° 40 CL � CDwwOaaaoaapof n, p � cw� oat w � O'C. () i n'Qn Ute,' O l ♦ /�+r b .-.'Uy b m O� (D O w p (D O p G b '(b y ® SOY •'C�Op G A� n�. c p,rp..C 0 � (D �C O (b "n" '�"'" C' 'C.'b .C�-., CD w Q' n.aC l5 '-t (ryD W (Cp b Ci w (D (D < w w !y ��Ryy �-.,C (D '''_ )mw• �-.. O Ami (D (D (D � n' .cC (CD C C " :-:=.� C'�� � � (D C3. O C C O O y O p, 0 M. Gt PA G w C 'D ('� (D (CD CD (D ^J� �® Cfl�J a4 c `y y (D "J '(D O Vi O C�' C7 p o mow... �p VL e�y y '`�...y ems-' o l�D (D r'O a'�• w w p�ew+ (CD R C (D (P (n ?(o o'W = C C(D O p''a e+ o .faD U, .�`'.. .C-.o A O c9 R tD 0'U E. R .-•(D C' ;-.(D J 'C C O a (n � w '. 3 s.0. �•y r-• y (P p oo � ° m * Ooh ' ' n- m ' ooxr na=T9w N � RA E SSS 3 ° c° ° c c° 0 3C nwwo (lwcn_. --- rn m x ;a �� 3 3 D ° 2� o xv (� ?= 2v" Oo;� TT �tr ° A) ,�c,z u o-s o n c- '° DD�Oo ° - Do` 'D SDn2,oD3..(n 71,`O 2 O O m '< xO 3 5•n� W° 'n a� 'o'.C' ? ° p 'v vU <.� (C a mw<� A m 3 O•'3< o .O'O �` O rn so '< s-.,x: ° .D o ° n (D 3z -0 ° ° poA' ° �c D�° D n W c`3O C1. o.v� o'. 2 f m` 'o�3.°� DVi x s m 'o a (n= ` ."1. O�- (Q'a n n m g v a ° p 2l<Z° N j D o 7Q ;<O o ao o_ p o < F c W ST: vm sn ry2am°''° c o g ° ° ,°a Da 4(>: n>> 23 ° w w <`•; O� y�. w° a o� a a F > > Z x ° 0 00 s o� _.o ^'�.� h �2� AO acv° (1~ W LO(^o o' a m N 3 ° C` a> > Z��a(n N w° o' 3 ° -n Nc` w�_'m 3- au'g'o c'� a' nD�� mrc c ° c ao -ic 3J.o.� c ° �f m m o.� m l'�c_z:t b r'o �c�° ° � � T�p n< >-A° < (� '0 3 x.�m Tm �p o D° .O. P.> Oa�cn -4O0� 3� 3 ° ° -2l< •` 4 CA ZTHA o cam•' m ` o Ajv(n ° y� � 7A� v a� ° 3p Z D n S a 'e o m o 3 o• Z ° D o' o' n. n _x0 O raEr •rr-' , ,'ooZPS > ; o,� o,: ,Q'� oO�o 'm <A�ac� Zc3 = ao0O�� (CD r pmN QPO n�0 GiO .dr oEr, dr r ��+`. m .< 'o 'o < o = ° y rJ L. x.-30 < ° d N o..N N 3_O °>O 69p '�O .b T -I 1 9-�-. _..<'D ° m <c-i Fri ami 3o-I A,o-I od-N1 P. mn'� m'^" °f'n Oc d2 S �-'9 = ? T� �, ao_� Cn Fa- y. 1 md9 aZ °D °D N3,3F wo iv3.cfo-. ddmb o a dy, f N F 9d dd=n �A O °Ojy- T• .>• N,^A 2 Z £ d d <T �^ °Ntr np ( F d �3 Ay o• N io>41 m �� a m .< =7c (� (13 (l0 D,O= C n 1 .3: nO ,3 z»n 3, . :E Ng�f Q° O nn,dn�nx»,n _ E'do. vo Cu 3 c m y T o r(ao'< o ° 3 G)s3xo m cz N .�. N; b- F b n� (O �� o< c-' 9 �a<od» n F-o_ _+-• 3 3 F N ° c o �P^c AN^ vH° �� oP�c oxo o p' •D < ... ao c0 d 9�oi ��-c �9cnb^ten 1 s m O, m > > aa, 9d a m-.3 n a vM v .nnv mr-IA n9 y, »30, 30 .o0 3�. Q a n� o �c N'" 3 0 m N ° w ° C A A o_ vm-'d d ° o T�-�- S O H <d, vyc yioN -Pmt. od < �P, d.°<O oy RO `Ze dcYdd mcc_dm-.,o,<3n°�,o�n°� CA .< D03 flo < v o y'c n; E , o - °d doo°�°N d-.o ° 3 g _a w ° C° p� DO c ,nH n(D< .a0 d °°tiuC A 3N= 'y tD Q'o ry� �<CI d 9 d < N.:v n,no_9�vir-0.3 S `< ' O 9 9 ba.p O, N p d-. 6 o y S N N y p' m N 7t 9 tp N 2 7 .�') k'n'< �;O 99 °o o•-' n° n�°., .c"c°d>• o ryd dr n�a-� ^ mo on_, d. C Aio mH d`C °3' F 'a < o ° Z� D� m N 3 �'m 'd •'F E,,n Nx Q0 <.� oyn Nna o n`-: Nd n w�9nm,3.c, i.•o�d3day�b� y -a- > ...TO�•�-'� 3 ''o ;.o A d c d o.nc _� GSA a c co Q Dv `N cuSccmom'''a-�.'o_cw-»-a -O L� v E 3�c wp Zmv v ryry � � 5.6-D`' bm E Q 9"e F 9 Dm °F A is oQ� n o°3,a ° W33 - �� ?- u'.'n az 3xv °'F >•� Nio d w °C. 3.o E.cn=oxo;:��o'nIOdo Z3 o '° �.� ° 3 m� -+r-'o m °• �po S. xK m7 00. mmo o m c «iM'^.,^oma.., PiD+ a p°J c'n b°<-'K�•<�..<,OOA Cq •di `O Z y C. N S Q Oti. (/1 moa„�D m m a«an�<<o'_3�3cHc°oa�°oa �� a o mo_D�< CL 1c,p o o <Qc3<.n (10 0oV� - v3 -. o N P'A� x �N � � o N'^v�° N.H•cx p p 1 m I m�P,c�'^+ i.'FNn C/> 'A ;m d WAipDA m ADaO T D o v�P° v-=i A`D 'O c=o (D m O A AA n <nAmzm z -c,oma a a� An �' (� r•C ➢o Om a S2 OOZD<m o� m _d •C x o O o-'�,_cn me�,d �' (D O m m1 _ �� m _� Dm< oy Os'Co< \ 1='1 W y m �n2 NPOm{=o^y w- O cF4'rpC y �DAc (D 0 9 N n_.°° d-F» —i \/ m cc 7J A N D x_.255 N � ce> > pm AT 20 N 'nn� Nm p� �O v Cn � N ZO Z �p D a0 p nJm n r'm dm. o^o _ oAm,..+ (A o NcQm �• �SnPs �• O J p V� n -1 CCS oomr*+ <'n oN-,n 3,nr) � o m H SM )Q o �. s_prtn (n { > r2 c�i'i� I pmm Z co OK.Z rm-- �c-'N -..� C7X0� C7 »v'. bd °-•N ,-� n' oo- RINZ oZ�N T< o aD „3^'0 c^�� �. (D p I o cn D1 d o < cm `� �PmmZQD''3 (n $ r�0 �A F O�ZAA Cn AD P'3oOm d'n^c Y �OD ° C=0<< NN $ °cN� a �„m�� - w r�zr �.ODDm O mD��c0 c.o < !� �i1oF n NK b v om �. T CL a. �Z , AD<o Z n T ° ° y r. 0 A7 �y Nm a xn ONN aaoQ D CO �- G� '90 3o W� oD PD9m Oc9 nm o ° o a (P rF� ' 1 rd °m c E N o 3 Z7 N b K m °° wooF o, 3A = 3r zn ➢< nd -Clow ° '� ° rl'1 Q l J N .”. O N V1 K aC P a�� x.c Z S�.o `" u,o �O °o C� �G�Y n .°Z Dn x.• c N 7 p p p n o; m,N 1 D SN z 3 b D�fc r+ a y va t d�J ° ' N In -.-la'Im-I"- . �,c a �t RESOLUTION NO. 2588 A RESOLUTION DENYING AN APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 464 BY WISHING WELL FARM, INC. TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A COMMERCIAL FEED LOT WHEREAS, Wishing Well Farm, Inc. has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate a commercial feed lot and thoroughbred training center in a portion of the North Half of the Nortwest Quarter of Section 18, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota within the City of Shakopee; and WHEREAS, on or about May 19, 1986, Wishing Well Farm, Inc. did apply to the Cityfor a Conditional Use Permit to operate a commercial feed lot and thoroughbred training center; and WHEREAS, on or about June 5, 1986 at a public hearing duly held the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee,pursuant to the hearing and recommendations of the City Planner, granted the application subject to certain conditions; and WHEREAS, within the time prescribed for so doing, an appeal was duly taken to the Shakopee City Council from the action of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, Shakopee City Council did hold a public hearing on said appeal on July 1, 1986 and at the conclusion thereof did move to direct the drafting of a Resolution denying the Conditional Use Permit No. 464 citing, among other things, the possibilities of water and air pollution and the further fact that the proposal is inconsistent with the Comprehensive City Plan. NOW, THEREFORE,The City Council of the City of Shakopee on the basis of the testimony and the evidence presented in relationship to the criteria of the Shakopee City Code respecting Conditional Use Permits which criteria are setforth in Appendix A hereto attached and made a part hereof, finds as follows: 1. With respect to Criteria No.1 - the Council finds that the proposed use will be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted and would substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity. 2. With respect to Criteria No. 2 - The Council finds that the proposed use will impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area. 3. With respect to Criteria No. 3 The Council finds that the applicant has probably met the criteria. 4. With respect to Criteria No. 4 - There has been no evidence presented. 5. With respect to Criteria No. 5 - There has been no evidence that adaquate measures have or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, and dust and it appears further that proposed use would produce offensive odor and fumes. 6. With respect to Criteria No. 6 - The Council is not of the opinion that the proposed use at this location is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. 7. With respect to Criteria No. 7 - The Council finds that the proposed .use is not consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the District. 8. With respect to Criteria No. 8 - The proposed use is in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. 9. With respect fo Criteria No. 9 - There has been no evidence or testimony. 10. With respect to Criteria No. 10 - There has been no showing of any ill effects that the proposed use would have on any businesses, in fact there is no testimony as to any businesses in the immediate area. NOW, THEREFORE, The Shakopee City Council finds that under the evidence and testimony previously adduced, the Applicant has failed to meet Criterias numbered 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8 and therefore the application for a Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate a commercial feed lot and thoroughbred training center is hereby in all respects denied. Adopted this day of July, 1986, by the City Council of the City of - 2 - Shakopee, Minnesota. Eldon Reinke, Mayor ATTEST: Judy Cox, City Clerk Prepared and approved as to -form by Julius A. Coller, II, Shakopee City Attorney iCb MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Engineerzlf::4— SUBJECT: 1986 Pavement Preservation program; Seal Coat DATE: July 11, 1986 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND: Bids have been received and publically opened for the seal coat portion of the 1986 Pavement Preservation Program. Two bids were received which is quite common for a seal coat project. The low bid was submitted by Allied Blacktop of Maple Grove at $E5, 315. 25 which is approximately 10% below the engineer' s estimate of $73, 200. 00 RECOMMENDATION: Allied Blacktop is a corn pet ent contractor responding to the requirements of the request for bids, therefore, I recommend awardal of the contract to Allied Blacktop in the amount of $65, 315. 25. REQUESTED ACTION: Offer Resolution No. 2587, A Resolution Accepting Bid on the 1986 pavement Preservation program (Seal Coat) , Project No. 1986-8, and move for its adoption. KA/pmp MEM2587 RESOLUTION NO. 2587 A Resolution Accepting Bid On 1986 Pavement Preservation Proqram (Seal Coat) Pro)ect No. 1986-6 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 1986 Pavement Preservation Program (Seal Coat) , bids were re- ceived, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Allied Blacktop 565,315.25 Buffalo Bituminous 569,446.50 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Allied Blacktop, 10503 89th Avenue N. , Maple Grove, MN 55369 is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1 . The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Allied Blacktop, in the name of the City of Shakopee for the improvement of the 1986 Pavement Preservation Program (Seal Coat) , Project No. 1986- 6 by Roadway Improvements, according to the plans and specifi- cations therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 19 Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to fora this day of 19 City Attorney i MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City C1erkDx 7 RE: Ord. No. 198 , Amending Chapter 5 of the City Code DATE: July 10 , 1986 Introduction and Background Ord. No. 198 , Amending the Liquor, Beer and Wine Licensing and Regulation, was adopted on July 1 , 1986 . rather than publish the ordinance in its entirety, staff is recommending that a summary be approved, for publication. As is normal practice, a copy of the ordinance in its entirety will be sent to the library. Recommened Action Move to approve the official summary of Ordinance No. 198 , An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending City Code Chapter 5 Entitled "Liquor, Beer and Wine Licensing and Regulation" , by Defining and Redefining Certain Definitions ; by Changing Provisions Relating to Proof of Age and Unlawful Acts by Minors , Financial Responsibility of Licensees, Beer and Liquor License Requirements , Restrictions and Unlawful Acts ; by Adding Provisions Relating to Alcoholic Beverages in Certain Buildings and Grounds , Consumption and Possession of Alcoholic Beverages, and Temporary Liquor Licenses ; by Repealing Provisions Relating to Unlawful Acts by Minors; and, by Adopting by Reference, Shakopee City Code Chapter 1 and Section 5 . 99 Which, Among Other Things , Contain Penalty Provisions. JSC/jms The Summary will be on the table Tuesday evening. ORDINANCE NO. 198 FOURTH SERIES An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending Shakopee City Code , Chapter 5 entitled "Liquor, Beer and Wine Licensing and Regulation " by Defining and Redefining Certain Definitions; by Changing Provisions Relating to the Proof of Age and Unlawful Acts by Minors, Financial Responsibility of Licensee, Beer and Liquor License Regulations, Restrict- ions and Unlawful Acts; by Adding Provisions Relating to Alcoholic Beverages in Certain Buildings and Grounds, Consumption and Possession of Alcoholic Beverages,and Temporary Liquor Licenses; By Repealing Provisions Relating to Unlawful Acts by Minors; and, By Adopting by Reference, Shakopee City Code Chapter 1 and Section 5.99 Which, Among Other Things, Contain Penalty Provisions. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: The following is the official summary of Ordinance of 198, Fourth Series approved by the City Council of the City of Shakopee on the 21st day of August, .1984, and which summary clearly informs the public of the intent of the Ordinance and a copy of which Ordinance is filed in the City Clerk's Office in the Shakopee City Hall and in the Public Library. SUMMARY The City Council of the City of Shakopee by the above Ordinance 198, Fourth Series, made the following changes in the Shakopee-City Code Chapter 5 entitled "Liquor, Beer, and Wine Licensing and Regulation" as follows and which Ordinance takes effect -.upon the passage and publication of this official Summary. A. Repeals Section 5.01 entitled "Def initions",Section 5.15 entitled "Restriction on Minors", Section 5.33 entitled "Unlawful Acts". B. Amends the City Code by 1. Adopting a new Section 5.01 explaning and defining 24 terms and words as used in the Code. 2. Amending Section 5.08 entitled "Unlawful Acts" by requiring proof of age, and defining unlawful acts. relative to minors, 3. Amending Section 5.09 entitled "Financial Responsibility of Licensee" by requiring proof of financial responsibility of licensee. 4. Amending Section 5.10 entitled "Beer License Required" by adding certain requirements and certain exemptions to the requirements. 5. Amending Section 5.13 entitled "Beer License Restrictions and Regulations" by clarifying the same. 6. Amending Section 5.30 entitled "Liquor Li�erise &egilireti":.ay-�plemeriting.licen: requirements. 7. Amending Section 5,32 entitled "Liquor License .Restrictions and .Regulations" by-limiting the issuance of licenses disqualifying certain persons from holding licenses; .amending Subd. 13 of Section 5.32 entitled '.'Unlawful Acts" by def inirig-them. 18. Amending Chapter 5 of the City Code by adding Sections as follows: (a) Section 5.091 entitled "Alcoholic Beverages in Certain Buildings and Grounds" prohibiting where all alcoholic beverage may be and providing certain exceptions. (b) Section 5.092 entitled "Consumption and Possession of Alcoholic Beverages on Streets, Public Property, Private Parking Lots to the Which the Public Has Access and Other Private Property'! regulates consumption and possession of such beverages in the various places above defined. ,._,,9. Amending Section 5.36 entitled " Temporary Liquor License" by providing for t-he same under conditions therein specified. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Prepared and approved as to form this 14th day of July, 1986. • City Attorney ��NN�Tq Minnesota a Department of Transportation -+ ►- District 5 2055 No. Lily Drive OF T;PIp�' Golden Valle Minnesota 55422 (612) x4ax31A 593-8403 July 14, 1986 t^ Mr. John Anderson, Administrator " U City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: S.P. 7005 (T.H. 101) _. Shakopee Bypass Shakopee Racetrack district Concept Plan #3 Dear Mr. Anderson: Mn/DOT has undertaken a geometric evaluation of the folded diamond inter- change concept in the N.E. quadrant of the Shakopee Bypass and County Road 83 interchange submitted with Judy Simac' s letter of May 8, 1986. Although the concept plan schematics look good for the folded loop and ramp in the interchange' s N.E. quadrant, further geometric layout development indicates there are several inadequacies associated with the concept because of development actions that have already been implemented in the Bypass and County Road 83 interchange area. The following problems are associated with the folded diamond concept: 1) The Canterbury Downs and 12th Avenue intersection is too close to the ramp and loop terminal on County Road 83. The distance is only 250' - 300' and is inadequate to properly develop the west- bound off-ramp left turn movement into Canterbury Downs. 2) The folded diamond presents sixteen conflict points with the street opposite the ramp and loop terminal on County Road 83. The diamond has only five conflict points and is simplified because the ramps are one-way traffic. 3) The folded diamond creates a very poor weave section for the north- bound County Road 83 traffic to eastbound 12th Avenue because of crossing with the bypass westbound off-ramp free right turn. An Equal Opportunity Employer Mr. John Anderson July 14, 1986 Page Two 4) The grades on the loop in the folded diamond may be steeper than those on a diamond ramp for the same traffic movement. 5) The southbound County Road 83 left turn movement storage to westbound bypass would be limited. Given the above circumstances, Mn/DOT prefers the diamond interchange at County Road 83 with the bypass as has been planned for quite some time. Changes would, of course, delay the bypass construction implementation considerably. S i n cgxely, W. M. Crawford, P.E���t/' District Engineer cc: Brad Larson - Scott County Memo To: John K. Anderson , City Administrator From: Gregg M. Voxland, Finance Director Re: League Bonding Pool Date: July 15, 1986 Introduction & Background The League is putting together a bond pool package in order "reserve" bonding capability in the event laws are passed that would restrict cities bonding authority. It appears that action may be taken on 7/16/86, so the League needs to set up the bonding entity tonight. Because Shakopee meets tonight, the League is asking that Shakopee pass a resolution authorizing or setting up the Joint Powers agreement with Egan and Stillwater to create the entity. This would not commit Shakopee to use the pool . Also, Council needs to designate a representative to serve on the Board of Directors of the new entity. The League will have a representative at the Council meeting with the resolution.