HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/15/1986 COunC.,
1
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items
DATE: April 10 , 1986
1 . In accordance with our administrative policy, the Chief
of Police has advised Laura Wermerskirchen that the City
has no objections to the blocking off of Third Avenue between
Scott and Atwood beginning Friday evening until Sunday
evening the weekend of July 25 , 1986 .
2. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has received
in excess of 60 requests for the Commission' s formal request
for proposals (RFP) for the sale of the Shakopee sludge
farm property. Bids are to be opened April 30th. There
have been ads in the local papers and apparently representatives
from the Mdewakanton Sioux Reservation are also investigating
making a bid. If you have any questions regarding this
item please contact me.
3 . The Police Department remodeling authorized by City Council
has now been completed. Please stop in and take a look
at the remodeled facilities.
4. Tom and I agreed that in regard to objective No. 3 .73 on
our annual Goals and Objectives regarding regular Police
reports , that the best way for Councilmembers to get a
comprehensive look at the report is to stop in and review
the quarterly report from the State in January, April,
July and October around the middle of the month.
5 . Attached is a memo from the Suburban Rate Authority regarding
their efforts in assisting the amendment of the public
utilities act to improve accountability of commissioners.
6 . Attached is an excerpt from an AMM mailing regarding Metro-
politan Governance Reorganization Legislation that passed
this session.
r 7 . Attached is a League "of Minnesota Cities insurance trust
report providing details of claims. If you have any questions
regarding this items please contact me.
8 . Attached is a report from the League of Minnesota Cities
regarding the Municipal Amicus Program that the City tentatively
offered to participate in.
9 . Attached is the building activity report for the month
ending March 31 , 1986.
10. Attached are the minutes of the Shakopee Baseball Lighting/
Stadium Committee Meeting of March 26 , 1986 .
11. Attached are the minutes of the Shakopee Coalition meeting
of April 7 , 1986 .
12. Attached are the minutes of the Downtown Ad Hoc Committee
meeting of February 26 , 1986 .
13 . Attached are the minutes of the February 25, March 3 , and
March 19 meetings of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
14 . The City has received the $2000 settlement with Ladder
Towers, Inc. for repair to the Fire Department ladder truck.
15 . Attached is the Revenue and Expenditure Report as of March
31 , 1986 .
16. Attached is the Program Costs by Department as of April
8 , 1986.
17. Attached is the Krass & Monroe billing summary as of January
24, 1986.
JKA/jms
Lefe%,ere
Lefler s ti
KennedN,
O'Brien
Dra-wz kATY OF �.,.
1 Prulc+siunal
\,vu iaiinn
2000 First Bank Place West MEMORANDUM
Minneapolis
Minnesota 55402
TO: SRA Executive Committee
Telephone (612) 333-0543
Telecopier(612) 333-0540
FROM: Counsel
Clayton L. LeFevere
Herbert P. Lefler DATE: April 4 , 1986
J. Dennis O'Brien
John E. Drawz
David J. Kennedy SUBJ: 1986 MPUC Legislation
John B. Dean
Glenn E. Purdue
Richard J. Schieffer
Charles L. LeFevere Chapter No. 409 of the Laws of 1986 amended various
Herbert P. Lefler III sections of the Public Utilities Act in response to
James J. Thomson, Jr.
Thomas R. Galt recent revelations concerning conduct Of PUC COmmissiOn—
Dayle Nolan ers and regulated utilities.
Brian F. Rice
John G. Kressel
Lorraine S. Clugg The new law made the following changes:
James M. Strommen
Ronald H. Batty 1 . As soon as a position is available, one of the
William P. Jordan
Susan Dickel Minsberg members must be from outside of the 7-county metro-
Kurt J. Erickson politan area (there are two vacancies) .
William R. Skallerud
Rodney D. Anderson
Corrine A. Heine 2 . The Governor will continue to select Commissioners,
John R. McDonald, Jr. but in addition to giving "consideration to" persons
David D. Beaudoin with backgrounds in law, engineering, public ac-
counting, property and utility valuation, he shall
now also consider persons with backgrounds in
finance, physical or natural sciences, production
agriculture, or natural resources.
3 . The Governor, rather than the Commission, shall
select the chairman, whose term shall he concurrent
with that of the Governor.
4 . Professional staff now join the Commissioners in
being prohibited from receiving any income from
regulated utilities , other than through a mutual
fund.
5 . No person is eligible to be a Commissioner if he was
employed by a company subject to rate regulation
within one year.
6 . Each Commissioner must file a statement of economic
interest with the Ethical Practices Board.
7 . Professional employees of the Commission and of the
DPS must immediately disclose to the Commission or
the Director of the DPS any communication, direct or
indirect, with a person who is a party to a pending
proceeding before the Commission regarding future
benefits , compensation, or employment to be received
from that person.
8 . The Commissioners , the Director and Deputy Director
of the DPS are prohibited from accepting employment
with an entity subject to rate regulation for one
year after leaving the Commission or DPS.
9. An entity subject to rate regulation or an agent
shall not offer to employ or compensate a Commis-
sioner, the Director or Deputy Director of the DPS
while that Derson is so employed or within one bear
after he or she leaves the Commission or DPS .
10 . Violations of the preceding are subject to a civil
penalty not to exceed $10 ,000 , enforced in the
District Court by the Attorney General .
11 . The legislation also authorized the Commission to
issue rules concerning ex parte communications, but
limited the scope of the rules to the times during
which a disputed matter is being considered, includ-
ing a rate case in progress. The Commission may not
issue ex parte rules as to other periods of time.
12 . A Commissioner may not communicate with a party in a
pending proceeding before the Commission regarding
past or future benefits or compensation, and the
Commission may dismiss a proceeding if there is a
violation.
13 . The Commission shall adopt a code of conduct cover-
ing the Commissioners and employees .
1A Linder certain circumstances , rate Cases may now be
settled without a contested case hearing.
I lobbied on several issues, with some success . I will
provide an oral report at the April 16 meeting.
gutters, and storm sewers. The city council must hold a public
hearing on establishment of the Reserve Fund and pass an Ordinance
or Resolution adopting it by a two thirds majority . The action is
subject to a reverse referendum if a petition signed by eligible
voters numbering 10% of those voting in the most recent general
city election is received within 30 days. The Council may hold an
election on the question at its own initiative. The funds may only
be used for projects described above or if abolished to pay other
general debt of the city .
4 . ASSESSMENT HEARING NOTICE (HF1886 , LAWS 1986 , CHAP . 473 ) .
Assessment hearing notice procedures have been modified to
eliminate the necessity to print in the legal publicized notice the
entire assessment role of individual parcels and assessments.
However, additional information will be required in the various
notices effective for assessments prepared after the date of
enactment, approximately April 1 , 1986 . The published notice in
addition to indicating hearing time, date, place, overall project
description, area to be assessed, and amount of total assessment
must include a description of the appeal procedures and any local
deferrment options.
The individual mailed notice to property owners must include the
published notice information plus specific assessment amount for
that parcel, the right and to whom prepayment may be made , whether
partial payments are authorized, the time by which prepayment may
be made without interest accrual, and the rate of interest to be
accrued if prepayment is not made. No further notice is required
after the hearing unless the assessing authority modifies the
assessment amount or interest and then further notification is
required only for those parcels which were affected by a change.
(Effective day after enactment) .
5 . METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE REORGANIZATION (HF1860 , LAWS 1986 ,
CHAPTER 0
v For the first time since 1974 , substantial changes were made to the
structural arrangements of the Metropolitan Governance System.
�N Improvements to this system have long been a priority for AMM
F lobbying efforts and we are generally pleased with the changes
accomplished this session.
APPOINTMENTS AND MEMBERSHIP ON THE METRO COUNCIL
-In addition to notice of vacancies under the open appointments
law, local governments must be notified in writing and the governor
must create a seven-member Nominating Committee of whom three must
be local elected officials to prepare a list of nominees for each
Metropolitan Council vacancy . The Nominating Committee must
conduct public meetings within or near the open or vacant
-3-
r
Vo consider candidates. '
-Members must be persons knowledgeable about urban and metropolitan
affairs and must be appointed to reflect fairly the various
demographic, political and other interests in the metropolitan
area.
-The provision for appointments by the Met Council to the RTB , MWCC
and MPOSC are standardized and are similar to the requirements for
council member appointments except the Met Council is the
appointing authority .
FINANCIAL REPORTING AND MANAGEMENT
Establishes an interagency financial reporting and management
advisory committee consisting of the chairs of major metropolitan
agencies. The advisory committee has three new responsibilities:
-To biennially publish a consolidated financial report that
projects and analyzes revenues and expenditures for all
metropolitan agencies;
-To develop uniform or consistent standards, formats and
procedures for the budget and financial reports of all metropolitan
agencies;
-To report to the Legislature on the potential for joint or
coordinated exercise of administrative functions by the
metropolitan agencies acting together.
PLANNING FOR WASTE WATER TREATMENT AND TRANSIT
-The present focus which is almost exclusively in the location and
description of new capital facilities is replaced by a broader
focus on strategic planning for services and related facility
systems.
-There is more emphasis on fiscal and financial planning.
-There is more emphasis on setting goals and objectives and
evaluating performance in meeting those goals and objectives.
-The Council is empowered to require the agency to make revisions
in the implementation plan to bring it into conformance with the
Council' s policy plan. Existing law allows the council merely to
approve or disapprove with comments.
METROPOLITAN AGENCY BUDGETS
The Met Council' s power to review and approve the capital budget of
the agencies is terminated beginning in 1990 . However, new
-4-
requirements are added to assure that agency budgets must be
consistent with and effectuate the agency implementation plan
which must be approved by the Met Council. Also, other changes in
the budgeting process enhance public access to the budgeting
process and increase the focus on changes in user fees.
Effective date is August 1 , 1986 for all sections of the bill
except the changes to the planning process for wastewater
treatment and transit are effective January 1 , 1987 .
6 . BONDING ALLOCATION (HF2287 , LAWS 1986 , CHAP . 465 ) .
C ' In response to Federal legislation, HR3838 , an allocation system
was necessary to meet pending requirements in HR3838 for Minnesota
agencies to be able to issue various types of tax exempt bonds.
The new system basically maintains Che 1985 entitlement and pool
scheme at reduced levels and adds bonds that were previously not
included in volume caps such as multifamily housing , hospital, and
many tax increment issues. There are new procedures and strict
time limits for receiving and utilizing an allocation from the
competitive pool. Most general obligation bonds for traditional
public purposes such as streets, storm sewers, public building,
etc. are not subject to the volume cap and will not require an
allocation. Most of the provisions within the bill are affective
upon enactment.
NOTE ; Cities with pending projects or plans for new projects
in the near future should consult with legal and financial
professionals for detailed advice on the new complex
requirements, process, and limitations.
7 . TORT LIABILITY (HF2078 , LAWS 1986 , CHAP . 455 ) .
The following summary of the Tort Liability and Insurance Reform
bill focusses on provisions ofp articular interest to cities. A
more detailed summary will appear in the May issue of the Minnesota
Cities magazine.
The definition of municipality for pu^poses of tort immunities is
clarified to include certain joint powers boards or organization.
Immunity is provided from any claim based on snow or ice conditions
on any highway or public sidewalk that does not abut a publicly
owned building or publicly owned parking lot, except when the
negligent acts of the municipality cause the condition. Immunity is
provided from any claim based upon the construction, operation, or
maintenance of municipal property that is intended or permitted to
be used as a park , as an open area for recreational purposes, or
for providing recreational services ; or from any claim based on
the clearing of land , removal of refuse, and creation of trails or
paths without artificial surfaces, if the claim arises from a loss
incurred by a user of park and recreation property or services.
-5-
ps4
North Star Risk Services, Inc. i>;r 900 First Bank Piace West
Minneapolis,MN 55402
- (612)339-8887
Date:IvA —.A l�
To: Judith Cox
City Hall
129 E_ 1st Avenue
Shakopee, PIinnesota 55379
RE: League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust
Detail Report of Claims - Property/Casualty Program
City of SHAKOPEE
Enclosed are copies of the captioned reports for your city.
The various items on the report are self-explanatory with the exception of
the "File Status":
"C" indicates - Closed/completed claim
"R" indicates - Reopened claim
Nothing shows - Open/pending claim
Each claim has two lines. The first line is for reserve amounts and the
second for amounts Paid. If a claim has been paid, the first and second
line each read the amount paid. If a claim is open, the first line will
read the amount reserved and the second will show "00". If a partial pay-
ment has been made at the time of the report, the first line will show a
reserve and the second the amount of the partial payment.
The last two lines on each report show totals. The first line is the total
reserved and paid for all claims. The second line is the total actually
paid.
Information in this detail report is provided to us by GAB.
e 3/12/86 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES PAGE 93
DETAIL REPORT OF ALL CLAIMS BY LOCATION
510 CITY OF SHAKOPEE MN 55379 CUSTOMER 261028
AS OF 02/28/86
ACCIDENT FILE CLAIM CAUSE FILE INCURRED INCURRED INCURRED INCURRED INCURRED
DATE NUMBER CODE CODE STATUS INDEMNITY MEDICAL OTHER EXPENSE LOSS
850827 5652707242A 11 50 .00 .00 .00 5.000.00 5,000.00
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00
MEYER CHARLES AL.LUALT AND PERSONAL INJURY VIOLA
851011 5652706917A 11 13 .00 .00 .00 2,500.00 2,500.00
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00
PERRY JEFFREY DECEASED
851011 56527069178 11 13 .00 .00 .00 2,500.00 2,500.00
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00
FORSELL BRUCE DECEASED
851201 5652707479A BO 78 .00 3,500.00 .00 .00 3,500.00
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00
RADEMACHER MARY PROPERTY DAMAGE FORD
860102 5652707215A 55 78 .00 2,000.00 .00 .00 2,000.00
.00 1,765.34 .00 .00 1,765.34
SHAKPOEE 84 FORD CROWN VICTORIA LTD
860102 56527072158 80 78 C .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00
SCHULTZ VINCENT 77 CHEV PU
860106 5652707243A 80 78 .00 900.00 .00 .00 900.00
.00 726.82 .00 .00 726.82
CROOKS GEORGE INSURED BACKED INTO CLAIMANT
860123 5652707367A 11 48 .00 100.00 .00 .00 100.00
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00
KERBER FREDERIC 1986 FORD SW
860123 56527073678 11 48 100.00 .00 .00 .00 100.00
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00
HENRICHS ROGER EXTENSIVE (9 YEAR OLD)
860130 5652707365A 55 78 C .00 3, 160.37 .00 .00 3, 160.37
.00 3, 160.37 .00 .00 3, 160.37
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 1984 FORD CROWN VICTORIA LTD
860130 5652707365C 80 78 .00 2,000.00 .00 .00 2,000.00
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00
THOMPSON MARK 1985 FORD
860130 56527073658 80 78 .00 3,000.00 .00 .00 3,000.00
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00
KENNEY SHANNON 1981 FORD
t
t
3/12/86 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES PAGE 94
DETAIL REPORT OF ALL CLAIMS BY LOCATION
510 CITY OF SHAKOPEE MN 55379 CUSTOMER 261028
AS OF 02/28/86
ACCIDENT FILE CLAIM CAUSE FILE INCURRED INCURRED INCURRED INCURRED INCURRED
DATE NUMBER CODE CODE STATUS INUEMNITY MEDICAL 0111ER EXPENSE LOSS
100.00 14.660.37 .00 10.000.00 24.760.37
.00 5.652.53 .00 .00 5.652.53
i"
I I I I 1��1
IIII IIII [OAR ' 11986
league of minnesota cideEf"YOFSHAKUPEE
Marcn 'S , 1936
To: City Managers , Administrators aid C4k
From: Donald Slater, Executive Dir SLG
Re: Municipal Amicus Program (11-I.A.P . )
The League Board of Directors reviewed the results of the LMC
survey of member cities on the proposed :municipal amicus
(brief) program. The survey results were quite favorable, and
therefore , the Board approved the program.
The M .A .P . will allow the League to exert a systematic
influence on the development of judgemade law impacting
Minnesota cities . Lack of staff resources in the past
prevented us from doing anything but an incomplete job of
filing friend of the court briefs in all the cases that needed
our help . In the previous six months, for example, the League
was able to file only two briefs from the seven requests.
Moreover, we have little idea of what cases with significant
inpact on cities are under consideration in the court system.
The M.A.P . will enable the League to participate in 10 to 25
cases per year. And we can develop information on district
court cases systematically.
The City Attorneys' Association proposed a governing panel of
ten members: two League board :members, four City Attorneys'
Association officers , the League General Counsel and three
additional city attorneys selected by the designated panel
members .
This program will add a full or part-time attorney to the
League staff . This attorney will , together with the panel ,
prepare briefs , track cases through the lower courts and select
important cases for League participation.
We appreciate the interest of you city officials who responded
to our survey. For those who did not respond but whose cities
wish to join us in the vital area of shaping the law, please
fill out and return the attached form.
I 63 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 C612) 227-5600
1-MICIPAL AMICUS PROGRA 9
YES. Our city wants to participate in the Municpal
Amicus Program for the 1585 calendar year .
City of
Enclosed with this form is a check for 10 percent of
our regular League dues or for percent if our city
attorney is a member of CLEAR .
Please bili me.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT
PERMITS ISSUED MARCH, 1986
Yr. to Date Previous Year
Number Number Valuation Number Valuation
Mo. Ytd.
Single Fam-Sewered 4 7 562, 674 4 7 505 , 500
Single Fam-Septic 1 1 145, 500 1 1 102,000
Multiple Dwellings 1 2 2 , 564, 000 2 2 204, 000
( # Units) (YTD Units) ( 92 ) ( 94) - ( 4 ) ( 4 )
Dwelling Additions 2 2 18,500 2 2 5, 350
Other - - _ - 2 200
Comm New Bldgs - 2 700 , 000 1 4 1, 939 ,781
Comm Bldg. Addns 3 3 887 , 267 2 5 2, 891,710
Industrial-Sewered - - -
Ind-Sewered Addns - -
Industrial-Septic - -
Ind-Septic Addns - -
Accessory/Garages 1 3 20 ,200 1 1 3 ,500
Signs & Fences 5 11 25, 390 1 3 2, 345
Fireplaces/Wood Stove - 1 1,500 - 2 6 , 500
Grading/Foundation - 5 316, 000 - 1 11, 000
Remodeling (Res) 4 5 19,700 2 4 21, 050
Remodeling (Inst) - - -
Remodeling (Comm/Ind) 3 10 2,699, 880 5 7 1,352 , 401
TOTAL TAXABLE 24 53 7 , 960 , 584 23 43 7 , 045 ,337
TOTAL INSTITUTIONAL - -
GRAND TOTAL 24 53 7 ,960,584 23 43 71045 ,337
No. Ytd. No. Ytd.
Variances - 2 1 2
Conditional Use 3 6 4 7
Rezoning - 1 1
Moving _
1 1
Electric 36 53 18 51
Plbg & Htg 27 56 24 51
Razing Permits _ _
Residential
Commercial -
Total dwelling units in City after completion of all construction
permitted to date. . . . . . . 3 ,931
Cora Hullander
Bldg. Dept. Secretary
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IN MARCH, 1986
6987 Charles Fonder 120 E. 1st Ave. Sign $ 500
6988 E. F. Knight, Inc. 1064 Prairie House 60 , 000
C' '4
6989 Siekmann Const. 1031 Shako ee House 53 , 000
6990 Chuck Mensing 1420 W. 3rd Sign 500
6991 Professional Contr. 203 E. 1st Ave. Alt. 18 , 000
6992 Fritz Menden 2544 Lakeview Dr. House 145 , 500
/9 ��SLy
6993 Paul Nguyen 407 Minnesota Alt. 1 , 500
6994 Nordquist Sign 1335 E. 10th Ave. Sign 3 , 200
6995 David Fisher 118 S. Holmes St. Alt. 12 , 000
6996 Procon, Inc. 203 E. 1st Sign 2, 000
6997 Foremost Fin. 1501 E. lst Alt. 1, 000
6998 G.F. Juergens 1162 Limestone Dr. House 135 ,000
6999 Pump & Meter 1147 Co. Rd. 83anks 30, 000
7000 Larry Link 1400 W. 3rd Garage 4 ,200
7001 Scott Bldrs. 1224 Shakopee Ave. Apt. Bldg 2,511, 000
7002 Valley Fair One Valley Fair Dr Addn. 600, 000
7003 Scenic Sign 1147 Co. Rd. 83 Sign 7, 390
7004 E.L. Prahm 1561 E. 1st Ave. Alt. 2 , 000
7005 Kraus-Anderson Racetrack Addn. 150 , 000
7006 Thomas Suel 2055 Hilldale Dr. Addn. 16 , 000
7007 Stadiums Unlimited Valley Fair Addn. 137,267
7008 Arvin Ernst 1061 Eastview Cir. Alt. 3 ,200
7009 Dale Dahlke 1279 Limestone Dr. House 104 , 000
7010 Laurent Bldrs. 1239 Polk St. Addn. 2 , 500
$3 , 999 ,757
SHAKOPEE BASEBALL LIGHTING/STADIUM COMMITTEE MEETING
MARCH 29, 1986
MEETING MINUTES
The Meeting was called to order at 9: 10 AM by Chairman Joe Schleper at Shakopee Perkins
Restaurant.
Members present: Dick Mertz, Tim Riffe, John Goihl, Bob Techam, Jim Stillman, John
Engler, Joe Schleper, Bill Schleper, Bert Noterman, Al Schmidt, and
George Muenchow.
Members absent : Ray Siebenaler, Jim O'Neill, Don Bisek, and Kevin O'Brien.
Chairman Schleper reported that Danny' s Construction has granted a reprieve regarding
payment due them for services rendered (approximately $35,000.00) . This means that
for the time being a bank loan is not necessary.
Fencing is urgently needed to secure the Grandstand area. Minnesota Valley Fence is
being contacted to erect the same. The Score Board soon will be hooked up by Macey
Electric.
Chairman Schleper has discussed a joint venture with Chaska Mayor Bob Roepke regarding
sponsoring a State Amateur Baseball Tourney in 1988, or whatever. The problem of a
prior commitment to Hamburg might eliminate Chaska from this arrangement. A committee
of Joe Schleper, Jim Stillman, Bob Techam, and George Muenchow will continue to pursue
this effort.
Fund Raising efforts were discussed. It was agreed that this time of the year is the
best:
a. Letters to major industries and businesses will go out after the next Chamber Of
Commerce Members Meeting. An opportunity to pledge will be made available at that
Meeting. Jim Stillman is in charge.
b. A non—profit Bingo Program in Savage apparently could provide funds. Noterman will
check this out.
C. Tim Riffe reported that the original owners of his Nursing Home Business were a
non—profit corporation. They still apparently have to give away money. Tim is
checking into this. To do this might mean forming a non profit corporation.
Dick Mertz will check on this.
d. No organization is selling refrigerated pizzas this summer. Bob Techam was asked
to discuss possibility of including this fund raiser through the Shakopee Baseball/
Softball Association when they have their annual meeting this Wednesday.
e. Al Schmidt will check with Craig Kusick, former Minnesota Twin, to see about the
possibility of having a Twins Old Timers Bas-eball Game for a Fund Raiser.
The Eddie Fehner Fund Raiser was discussed. It was agreed to invite the teams of the
Adult Softball Leagues to participate. They, in turn, could then provide some of the
players to oppose Eddie Fehner's Team. The following committee was appointed to lead
this project: Jim O'Neill (Churn) , John Engler, Bill Schleper, Tim Riffe, and John
Goihl.
The meeting adjourned at 9: 50 AM.
Res ectfully submitted, /�,,,•r
• V ` U
George F. Muenchow, Secty.
it
SHAKOPEE COMMON
1100 East Fourth Avenue • Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
"Founded in 1983"
April 7, 1986
The meeting was called to order at 7: 10 AM by Chairman Brian Norris in the Citizens
State Bank Community Room.
Members Present: Todd Schwartz (Rotary) , Jim Streefland (Lions) , Claude Kolb (K of C) ,
Sr Jo Lambert (St. Francis Regional Medical Center) , John K. Anderson
(City of Shakopee) , Joan Salter (Food Shelf) , Jerry Knutson (Minnesota
Correctional Facility-Shakopee), Jackie Kes (Scott-Carver Economic
Council) , Brian Norris (Citizens State Bank) , Hazel Ecklund (Sr. Citizens) ,
and George Muenchow ( Shakopee Community Services).
1986 Proposed Objectives were reviewed:
(1) More Sr Citizen Involvement. (1st Ave. crossing problem discussed. )
(2) Establish Clearing House for Volunteers. (Need a person and a place. )
(3) Develop newspaper "You Can Help" column.
(4) Focus on two or three issues at a time.
(5) Expand membership in Coalition.
(6) Appoint Coordinators for four areas of concern including Volunteer Issues,
Economic Development etc.
(7) Research and evaluate information on services providing food, housing, and jobs
for those who need these services.
Motion by Knutson, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Goals as for 1986 as recommended.
Carried.
Coalition Coordinators positions were discussed. It was hoped to fill them by the next
meeting.
Jackie Kes reported that although the statewide Minnesota Foodshare effort was behind
projections, that Scott County did quite well. The final deadline is April 11. So
far Scott County has produced $10,660.00 plus 11,3351bs of food. The special storage
area planned to be used became unavailable at the last minute, therefore all food has
been stored at the Food Shelf. Jackies position is being elininated as of May 1, 1986.
Joan Salter reported that 240 families were served at the Food Shelf in March including
145 families from Scott County. There were 153 individuals served from Shakopee. It
was felt that Food Shelf numbers correlates with unemployment and domestic violence.
Letterhead stationery and envelopes as developed by Waldridge & Associates was distributed.
Volunteers Of The Month selected by acclamation were Bob & Judy Techam (for month of May) .
The Scott County Volunteer Coalition was discussed. A special recogntion celebration
will be held at the Mdewakanton Sioux Community Cultural Center on Wednesday, April 23.
All County Volunteer Agencies are encouraged to participate.
Chairman Norris suggested that all members give a reminder to two or three people each
month regarding these meetings.
Res ectfully sub1mmiitted,
George Muenchow, Acting Secty.
DOWNTOWN AD HOC COMMITTEE
Shakopee, Minnesota
February 26 , 1986
Chrm. Laurent called the meeting to order at 7 : 40 a.m. with
the following members present: Terry Forbord, Gary Laurent,
Don Martin, Jim Stillman, Pete Sames and Steve Clay. Absent:
Mike Sortum, Dan Steil, Joe Topic, Bill Wermerskirchen and Tim
Keane. Also present: Jerry Wampach, Liaison; Jeanne Andre,
Community Development Director; John Anderson, City Administrator;
and Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer.
Terry Forbord/Don Martin moved to approve the agenda. Motion
carried.
Jim Stillman/Pete Sames moved to approve the minutes of the
February 12 , 1986 meeting as kept. Motion carried.
Election of Officers.
Don Martin moved to elect officers for a period of two years.
Motion died for lack of a second.
Terry Forbord/Don Martin moved to nominate Gary Laurent for
Chairman for a one year term and Steve Clay for Vice President
for a one year term. Motion carried.
Don Martin/Terry Forbord moved that nominations be closed and
that a unanimous ballot be cast for the nominees. Motion carried.
Terry Forbord reported on T.H. 101/169 Bridge Junction Siting
Committee. One meeting has been held with the Engineers. Barton-
Aschmann need to review traffic counts from Mn/DOT. The next
meeting is scheduled for Feb. 27, 1986. A certain number of
alternatives will be eliminated to expediate the project and
it is hoped that after a review of the objectives at this meeting
they will have a better perspective of the alternatives. There
has been no word as to whether or not Federal and State budget
cuts will affect the project. The Community Development Director
informed the committee that City Council has agreed to help
fund lobbyists for the pending highway projects in Shakopee.
According to the City Administrator the Council will be reviewing
the use tax increment in the City. There will be more increment
than expected from the racetrack, which could be applied to
other projects. The State is reviewing tax increment at this
session. Maybe things can be packaged a little different than
originally planned due to State and Federal statute changes.
Proposals from architects on the City Hall site are due March
7th. Twenty four architects were contacted and about half have
responded to date. This issue will probably come up at the
March 25th Council meeting.
Don Martin, Pete Sames and Jim Stillman along with John Anderson
and Jeanne Andre met with the Shakopee Public Utility Commission
on February 25th. Lou VanHout believes a different type fixture
from what the Committee has chosen for streetscape would give
33% more lighting for a quarter of the voltage. The Commission
is concerned that the lighting be energy efficient. The proposed
fixtures give off 1. 5 candle light power and Supt. VanHout would
prefer 2 candle light power. He offered to contact several
campanies and ask them to do an analysis on the efficiency of
different types of fixtures. Further research will be done
to determine if two types of lighting should be used - one for
lighting, the other for aesthetics. It was agreed that a dual
system would be acceptable if it is more cost effective.
Tim Erkkila provided the following information b
cost of the different types of light Y Phone: The
$1, 350 for steel and g Poles is $1, 850 for aluminum,
wired for both single and double fixtures e�but hebanner mounPoles can ts
were not included. The cost of pre-cast concrete benches with
no pigment would be $400 each and the cast iron and wood would
be, $750 each.
Although SPDC is not enthused about cost
participationthe
lighting they could give the City dollars for what theylwould
spend on 2nd Ave. rejuvenating the system. The Commission also
liked the idea of installing conduit for the electrical system,
and Mr. VanHout will determine where conduit would be needed
so that it can be costed into the total package.
A discussion was held on landscaping for 2nd Ave. between Holmes
and Lewis adjacent to the parking lot. Because of a drainage
problem and the urgency to complete the project before inclement
weather a steep slope resulted. There was a difference of opinions
as to what improvements and modifications should be done this
spring. Sketches of proposed improvements were studied. Cost
estimates for a wood retaining wall were $34, 000, concrete/brick
$65,550 and curb, sidewalk and fixtures $80, 000.
Steve Clay moved that the hill be left as is and that it be
sodded this spring and finished when other streetscape is done.
Motion failed for lack of a second.
Terry Forbord feels that we are trying to show
le
to indicate that we are moving along. He doesn ' telike sthething idea
of spending extra money but doesn' t like to see it incomplete.
Terry Forbord/Steve Clay moved to proceed with finishing up
to whatever degree is possible at this time, with the berm on
2nd Ave. parking lot between Holmes & Lewis ,
in for lighting and a retaining wall. Motion carried. conduit
Members will be notified when the next meeting date is set.
The meeting adjourned at 9: 10 a.m.
Darleen Schesso
Secretary
13
MINUTES
OF THE
SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in special session on
February 25, 1986 at 4:30 PM in the Utilities meeting room.
Commissioner Cook offered a prayer of divine guidance in the deliberations
of the Commission.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Cook, Kirchmeier and Kephart. Also Manager
Van Hout.
A discussion was .held on past practices forstreetlighting by the. Shakopee
Public' Utilities Commission.
Jeanne Andre, Shakopee Community Development Director, arrived to discussed
lighting in conjunction with the downtown redevelopment. The area of the proposed
downtown redevelopment is from Atwood to Sommerville Streets, between First and
Third Avenues; plus Sommerville to Spencer Streets, between First and Second
Avenues.
She expects the installation of the first step of the lighting would be in the
Spring of 1987.
John_ Anderson, City Administrator, Don Martin, Jim Stillman and Pete Sames
of the Downtown Committee arrived.
Discussion over the normal street lighting practice at Shakopee Public
Utilities Commission and how this would mesh with new lighting in Downtown.
President Cook stated the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission concerns
were with the adequacy, efficiency and maintenance costs of any proposed lighting
and that the Utilities would need to have approval rights before agreeing to
maintain or to power new or changed lights.
A consultant report for the Downtown Area had given a recommendation for
lighting with a street illumination of 1.54 foot candles. Manager Van Hout
suggested 2.0 foot candles would be more desireable and could be achieved with
lower cost than the lighting recommended.
The technical aspects of lighting levels and efficiency were discussed.
Consensus was that Manager Van Hout would get designs and estimates for lighting
from several suppliers.
Ms. Andre requested that further information on the conduit system needed for
putting electric lines underground be sent to her so the consultant could estimate
costs.
Motion to adjourn by Kirchmeier, seconded by Kephart. Motion carried. Motion
adjourned.
i
ATTEST: '" l
Lou Van- Hout, Manager
► 3
MINUTES
OF THE
SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in regular session on
March 3, 1986 at 4:30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room.
Commissioner Cook offered a prayer for divine guidance in the deliberations
of the Commission.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Cook and Kephart. Also Manager Van Hout,
Secretary Menden and Liaison Wampach. Commissioner Kirchmeier was absent.
Motion by Kephart, seconded by Cook that the minutes of the Febraury 3, 1986
regular meeting be approved as kept. Motion carried.
BILLS READ:
City of Shakopee 20,032.00
Carlson Hardware Co. 105.75
Chermak Refrigeration Co. , Inc. 70.75
Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Co. 1,225.00
City of Shakopee 924.62
Dressen Oil Co. 78.66
Eagan Office Products 9.38
Feed Rite Controls, Inc. 545.74
Hard Chrome, Inc. 175.00
Harmons Hardware 67.90
Henningson, Durham and Richardson 491.47
Leef Bros. , Inc. 30.00
Merrill Lynch 100,000.00
Deputy Registrar 33.25
Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association 4,870.00
Minnetonka Testing Laboratory 90.00
North Star Waterworks Products 19.22
Northern States Power Co. 89,339.50
Northern States Power Co. 1,076.01
Northern States Power Co. 317.97
Northern States Power Co. 259,142.59
Shakopee Postmaster 2,500.00
Park Machine 150.00
Pitney Bowes 115.50
Reynolds Welding Supply Co. 3.65
River Electric Association 6,703.00
Schoell and Madson, Inc. 70.87
Scott County 135.00
Scott County Sheriff's Office 36.05
Sears Roebuck and Co. 9.43
Serco 56.00
Shakopee Ford 34.88
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 96.33
Shakopee Services 22.00
Southwest Suburban Publishing, Inc. 41.76
Starks Cleaning Service 49.40
Suel Business Equipment 297.03
Duane Swenson Const. , Inc. 485.00
Total Tool 33.50
Travel Design, Inc. 1,160.00
Truck Utilities and Mfg Co. , Inc. 33.52
Twin City Testing 126.00
United Compucred 118.80
Valley Industrial Propane, Inc. 9.89
Lou Van Hout 35.90
Water Products Co. 22.23
Woodhill Business Products Inc. 361.99
Motion by Cook, seconded by Kephart that the bills are allowed and ordered
paid. Motion carried.
Commissioner Kirchmeier arrived and took his seat.
A communication from Barry Stock was acknowledged regarding the action being
presented to the City Council on the cable TV franchise.
Liaison Wampach gave a report to the Commission as to the status of the liability
insurance for the Valley Ice Arena.
Secretary Menden reported to the Commission that the Valley Ice Arena is now
current on their electric bill.
Liaison Wampach was asked to check with John Anderson on correcting the appointment
terms of the Commissioners.
Manager Van Hout asked whether the downtown Committee had discussed the street
lighting issue further. Liaison Wampach will ask that the fixtures suggested by the
Downtown Committee be sent to SPUC so Manager Van Hout can continue with his part.
The job descriptions were presented to the Commission. They will be reviewed at
the April meeting.
The 5 year Capital Improvement Plan was presented to the Commission. The
Commission perused the plan making some revisions. The revisions will be retyped for
the April meeting.
Security Lighting for the Prahm Coll addition was discussed.
The electric and water rates will be studied after the final audit figures are in.
Motion by Kephart, seconded by Kirchmeier to accept the low bid from Graybar
Electric Co. in the amount of $14,540.00 for 20,000 1/0 solid XLP full neutral wire
brand name Conductor Products, Inc. Motion carried.
Manager Van Hout gave a report on the status of the operations of some of the wells.
A resolution will be drawn up for the April meeting regarding the designation of
authorization to staff.
A meeting was set for March 19, 1986 at 4:30 P.M. to award the bids for Well V.
There were no new plats for February, 1986.
There was 1 fire call for February, 1986 for a total man hours of 1 hour and
20 minutes.
There were no lost time accidents for February, 1986.
The next regular meeting will be held on March 31, 1986 at 4:30 P.M. in
the Utilities meeting room.
Motion by Cook, seconded by Kephart that the meeting be adjourned. Motion
carried.
�1
Barbara Menden, Commission Secretary
G
d
t
}
E
)3
MINUTES
OF THE
SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in special session on
March 19, 1986 at 4:30 PM in the Utilities meeting room.
Commissioner Cook offered a prayer for divine guidance in the deliberations
of the Commission.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Cook and Kirchmeier. Also present Manager
Van Hout.
Ken Adolf attended meeting to present bid tabulation and recommendations
for Well #7.
Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Cook, that the bid be awarded to
E. H. Renner for Well #7, project #86-1 for $92,565.00. Motion carried.
A special meeting was set for April 9, 1986 at 4:30 PM to award the bid
for pumphouse equipment.
Motion by Cook, seconded by Kirchmeier, to award the bid for the new water
truck to Boyer Truck for $10,714.00. Motion carried.
Motion by Cook, seconded by Kirchmeier to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned.
ATTEST: � t
Lou Van Hout, Utilities Managef
1986 CITY OF SHAKOPEE R V E N U E R E P O R T AS OF 3-31-86 PAGE 1
FUND 01 GENERAL FUND_ _ C U_R R E 4 T M_ _D NT_ _H __ _ _ Y_ E A_R _T 0 0_ A T E
'� ACCOUNTIDESCRIPTION - EST, REVENUE� - - ACTUAL - VARIANCE PCT EST. REVENUE T ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT jl
' 3011._GEN. .LEVY - CURRENT_- OD, 9279505.00 19738.0_2- 9299243.02- .2%
3022 FISCAL DISPARITIES ,00 s920000.00 430312.40 981687.60- 47.1 6
3 � I
TAXES .00 10190505.00
___
� 419574.38 9030.62_4.1
- -- 01 ----- - - - -- y
- - I
6 ' 3031 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INT. 00 , .00 .00 000'
3032 NALTY_._& INTEREST-___,_-- .00 . .00 .00 .00 _!_I
_�E.
to - - -- -___._. �__..-._-------- -T----- ,:�
r' 11 *r*r SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS .00 . .00 .00 .00
12 u,
17' .'3109.TRACK;FRANCHISE ,.�00. :.:1500000.00 : .00. 1500000.00- "
14
3111 LIQUOR LICENSES .00 43x000.00 .00 430000.00- O
3112 BEER LICENSES30.00 ':_41000.0.0 .30,00 .30970.00- '.8
° 3113 BINGO-i GAMBLING LI__C. .00 200.00 .00 -200.00-
' 17 3114 CIGARETTE LICENSES 3.6.25 750.00 101.25 648.75- 13.5
18 3115 POOL TABLE LICENSES .00 600.00 _ .00 600.00-
19 3132 BUILDING PERMITS --�- 14s2�5.60� - -- - (20500.00---30127.85 320372.15-
20' -3133 PLUMBING PERMITS : 7jp4V3.25 :'s 100000.00 80966.50 1}033,50- '.89.7 `0
21 !4 3134 MECHANICAL PERMITS 50113.00_ 80000.00_ 69119.25 105_80.75- 80.2
22 80.50 219.50- 26.8
3135 WELL PERMITS &0.5D
23 3136 SEWER 8 WATER PERMITS 120.00 l 30000.00 10654.50 10345.50- 55.2
300.00
24 3137 ELECTRICAL PERMITS _ _ 209L3.50 70000.00 _ 30884.50 30115.50- 55.5
23 3135 STREET OPENING PERMITS - I/5.00-'-�"-- --".�1�200.00 :.255.00 �9�5.00- 21.3
26 3150..MISC. BUS. PERMITS ':,5-50 900.00 .00 '- 900.00-
2/ 3160.DOG LICENSES _ _ _ .OD 200.00 1_7_000 183.0_0 8.5
20 3161 RISC. NON-BUS. LIC. .00 - 10.00 .00 150.00-
29 31
30 *fit LICENSES B PERMITS 30 0!R6.60 2910800.00 510536.35 2400263.65- 17.7
31
32.. 3326 STATE GRANTS42
0631.83 .00 51110.52 50110.52 a3,
33 3321 LOCAL _GOUT AIDS moo 4901,000.00 .00 4900000.00- 441
34 3322 HOMESTEAD .110 18000il0.00 .00 180,000.00 41
-
411
35 3323 POLICE STATE AID .00 441000.00 .00 440000.00-
36 _3324_ _POLICETRAINING _ __ _ .00_ _ .00 _.00 .00 al,
3,, 33342T5TATE H1iY.MAINT. AID - -- x.00 - 151495.00 70747.50 70747.5Q- 50.0 49
381 '3336' CIVIL DEFENSE .DO: ' 450.00 412.17 :.'37.83- 91.6 S0
39 '.3337N08ILE HU ME _ '':.00_. ':'111.00.00 - .00 10100.00- 51
40 3340 COUNTY ROAD 8 BRIDGE AID .00 56s 000.00 800918.19 240948.19 144.6 53
al 3341 AGGREGATE TAX .00 40000.00 20014.10 10985.90- 50.4 5.
42 sFJ
43 . ***A INTERGOVENMENTAL - --
�yI0I145.00--- 9602.48 6940812.52- 12.2 ---- "
44 5U
i.:., gr.
431 '3506 VALLEYFAIR 9s240.00_. '':00 902_4_0_.0_0- 60
- - -
a6 3507 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES - - .OD- 150000.00 .00 159000.00- G1
473508 IND.REVENUE BOND FEE .00 50000.00 500.00 40500.00- 10.0 6`
63
46 3509 ENGINEERING SERVICES 130.10- 1000000.00_ _161_764.24 _8_30235.76- 16.8 6.1
49 3510.ENG. GRADE FEE 1110.00 29000.00 555.00-T- 1945.00--27.8��-rg
I50 351L' PLAN CHECK FEE 61,3V9.00 15000D.00 150022.50 22.50 100.2 6;
I51 ': 351,.__ .ASSESSMENT SEARCHES_ ' .364.00 20000.00_ 9_72.00 1,,028.00_-. 48.6 450
52 3511 SALE OF DOCUMENTS 41LB.2D - 31000.OD - 913.99 20086.01- 30.5 t0
53 3514 ?LATS-REZON-YAR-C OND.USE 47:5.00 50000.00 10630.00 30370.00- 32.6 ]C
71
54 351F ?FILING FEE - .00 .00 .00 .00 72
J
75
1386 CITY OF SHAKOPEE R E V E N U E R E P O R T AS OF 3-31-86 PAGE 2
FUND 01 GENERAL FUND C U R R E 9 T_ M 0 N T H ------- YEAR_ _ _ _ _ TO DATE
1 ACCOUNTIDESCRIPTION E9T. REVENUE AECTUAL " VARIANCE PCT EST. REVENUE ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT
2 1
3 3517 RETAINED FEES ._O_D _ 200._00 .00_ 20_0.00- _
4 3520 SNOY REMOVAL - -- - - - .OD 29000.00 19312.85 687.15- 65.6
5 3522 WEED CUTTING CHARGES 12'4.00 .00 124.00 124.00
6 352_3_MISC.P_B_.YKS.SERVICES 29_127.69 19000.00 5_9328.0_7 49328.07 532.8
7 35211 STREET REPAIR - - - 8614,33 - -------- --- 200.00 363.08^ 163.08 181.5----
6 3526 FIRING RANGE .00. 500.00 .00 500.00-
° 35�CONCESSIONS-POOL----------- =- - - ------------.00. _. __69500.00-- ---- -.0-0_ 61500.00 _
0 3531 MISC. POLICE SERVICES .00 .00 .00
11 3532 POUND FEES 6 FINES 11/8.00 800.00 118.00 682.00- 14.8
12 3533 FIRE CALLS 8 STANDBY FEE 29035.00 219000.00 69665.50 149334.50- 31.7 ilk
____...-- - - - ---- - - - ------ ---------- - ----- - 7----o_- --0-- ---- - ------- ---
Ti3539 PATER SLIDE ,00 30000.00 . 0 3 #000.00
14 354D.SEASON TICKETS-POOL I.00 149000.00 00 19000.00- ;f
13 3541 AOMISSIONS-POOL .00 99500.00_ •00 99500.00-
- -- - -- --- -- - - ------------------ �----------- -- - ----------------------- -
1e 3542 SPINNING LESSONS .00 59700.00 .00 59700.00- ='
17 3543 MISC. POOL INCOME .00 50.00 .00 50.00-
16 3650 REFUSE DISPOSAL 129GL1.17 1679900.00 419339.59 1269560.41- 24.6
20 **64 CHARGES FOR SERVICE '. 2595016.29 4159530000 919608.82 323.9981.18- 22.0
21.
:z 3660 COURT FINES 59139.52 539000.00 169592.41 369407.59- 31.3 =
23
24 rrra COURT FINES ,- _59138.52 __ - --- 539000.00 169592.41 369407.59- 31.3 3.
25 3J
26 3D10 INTEREST 00: 459000.00 .00 459000.00- 34
3'
27 3321RENT _ -- 3bv5.00 69500.00 19465.00 53035.00- 22.5 3.
26 3822 CONTRIBUTIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 37
29 3890 MISCELLANEOUS 385.00 139000.00 99140.00 39860.00- 70.3 3G
31
30 ______ _______________ ac.
31 •�•0 MISCELLANEOUS 7510.00 640500.00 109605.00 539895.00- 16.4
41
32
42
33 39D0_TTRANSFERS -00: 3279}00.00 .003279400.00-_ _ X23
34 3910 SPUC CONTRIBUTION 209032.00 2749384.00 609096.00 X21419288.00- 21.9 43
35 46
47
36 rrra TRANSFERS 209012.00 - 6019784.00 609096.00 5419688.00- 10.0 46j
37
38
39 FUND TOTALS 839115.24 392379224.00 3689245.44 298689978.56- 11.4
40 531
41 5a
5•.
42 51
43
44
43
9 61
47 62
67
46 6.1
49 61
5o GG
67
51. : GO
52 69
53 70
71
54 72
573
.,156 75
1, Y
J
1996 CITY OF SHAKOPEE E X P E N D I T U R E R E P O R T AS OF 3-31-86 PAGE 1
FUYD- 01 GENERAL FUND______: __ ^C U R R E It T M 0 N T_ H _ _ Y_E A R__T_0 D A_T E
' ACCOUNT/DESCRIPTION APPRDPR[AT[ON ACT64L VARIANCE PCT APPROPRIATION ACTUAL - ' VARIANCE PCT
2 _ 2
3 4100 SALARIES-FULL TIME 98 419.71 _ 192389975.00 251 527.03 - 987 147.9 2D.3 4
• 1112 OVERTIME-FULL TIME 3,3EA8.32 419545.00 79079.53 34,465.47 17.0
5 4130 SALARIES - PART TIME 3928.9.58 1160700.00 99562.46 3019137.54 8.2 7
° 4140 PERA _- - _ - 79 495.80 93,295.00 _ _209 326.32 729 968.68 21.8 s
T 4111 PENSIONS-FICA 49 3969.35 539350.00 �11*589.58�-411760.42-21,7 9
° 4150-HEALTH i LIFE INSURANCE b,89.4.92 1079309.00 119805.36 899503.64 16.6 10
4151 VORKMENS_ COMP.INSUR_AN_CE_ __ 00 501945.00 459001.00 59944.00 88.3 ' is
10 4152 UNEMPLOTMENT COMP. - - - - - .00�-~ ------�4--- .00 .00
11 to
Is
12 9999 PERSONAL SERVICES 123x85'.7.71 19702s119.00 3629891.28 193399227.72 21.3 la
13 - 17
14 4210.SUPPLIESa' 49$91.14 662955.00 89971.75 58,483.25 12.7 1°
19
15 4215 SURFACE MATERIALS _- -_,_- :; ., $8.9.00 _ 231000.00 889.00 222111.00 3.9 m
° 4222 MDTOR FUELS d LU3RTCANTS 30OZ3.95 - 43s440.00� 29296.43 419143.57 5.3 21
17 4230 BUILDING MAINT. 5,187.03 339950.00 129219.36 219730.64 36.0 23
1s 4232 EQUIP MAINT 3 REPAIR 79080.35 619415.00 149747.06 469727.94 24.0 24
-- -- - - ----- - -- ----- - _- -66____
1fl 1234 UTIL.SYSTEM MAINT. 6 CON . -�--- - -- .00- -- _-.00 - - .00 2n
2r, 4242 SEAL COATING .00. 1819000.00 '`'.00 1819000.00 26
27
21 4291 INVALID OBJECT r .00. .00 .00 . .00 2
22 4310 PROFESSIONAL SERVIS 5291918.96 u1409650.00 709138.21 709511.79 49.9 z9
CE
23 4316 LEGAL FILING FEES-ETC. 10.00. 300.00 80.00 220.00 26.7 3°
24 4319 PROMOTIONS 91.66 1,500.00 91.66 19408.34 6.1 32
4320,PDSTAGE - - @l.35- ----- - 4,975.00 - 29000.05 ---2,97{.95 40.2 -..
2s 33
26 4321 TELEPHONE 1,0}2.35 170340.00 31039.39 149300.61 17.5 ; 34
n" 133@ TRAVEL & SUBSISTENCt_ 234.47- 69275.00 . 69.43- 69344.43_1.1 _ 36
° 4350 PRINTING t PUBLISHING 771;2. _8T�- - 26.9500.00 29201.61 249298.39 8.3 37
29 4360 INSURANCE .00, 791300.00 .00 7910300.00
239321.84 16.4
'0 4380.RENTSTIES -- ------------.._-_--- - 21i7�4.80,- - ----- ---- 23t�020.00 679200.00 +79714.80 226T245.20�22.� -4 !
12 4390,CONFERENCES d SCHOOLS 6Q.5.80, . 219930.00 1.29903.69 191026.31 13.2 43
33 4391 DUES L_ SUBSC__R_IPT_IONS29-6.04 109870.00 1 5e 22.51 99347.49 14.0_ 4:
34 4395 MERCHANDISE - .00 - 29500.00 .00 29500.00 -- - 45
35 4411 CURRENT USE CHARGES .00 19500.00 .00 19500.00 06
36 4499 MISCELLANEOUS V9.00 2,300.00 34.00 29266.00 1.5 47
45
3)'.. 49
36 - **** SUPPLIES i SERVICES 10594V6.33 190262980*00 1729218.25 8549761.75 16.8 s
39
so 4511 CAPITAL--EQUIPMENT 99733.06 2869400.00 40x621.28 245,778.72 14.2 33
61 4519 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS .00 . .00 .00 .00 s'
32 5..
43. t*rt CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 91733.06 - 2869400.00 409621.28 245x778.72 14.2 T7
44 Aa
90
aa'. 71.0_PERMANENT_TRANSFERS .-00-._�_ �J _ 452000.00 .00 45 000.00 so
46 _ _ - -------- --------------------- -----�---- --- - 61
e2
J7 rs rR TRANSFERS .00 459000.00 .00 452000.00 63
4a
64
49 1982 '6AXES -- .00 . 11500.0-0 -- ---.00 --- 99500.30------ e5
so - 66
67
sl **rt ��iEMITTANCES .OD 19500.00 .00 11500.00 6a
92 60
53 1991 CONTINGENCY .00185,700.00 5,462.63 180,237.37 2.9 7
54 ),1
55 ***e `ONTINGEhCY .00 1852700.00 52462.63 1801237.37 2.9 73
1996 CITY OF SHAKOPEE E X P E N D I T U R E R E P D R T AS OF 3-31-86 PAGE 2 +
FUYO01 GENERAL FUNt7_-------�_--•-_-• _C U—R _R--E IL: T-__M O N T_H_ _ _— �._�__—_—_r_E_A_R _ T 0 0__A_T--E_----
ACCOUNT/DESCRIPTION APPROPRIATION ACTUAL VARIANCE PCT APPROPRIATION ACTUAL, VARIANCE PGT
2
4
FUND TOTALS v� 239x007.10 3x247,699.00 5819193.44 2,666,505.56 17.9
s 6
7
B n
7 9
e 10
9 1
[13
16—_.__-- —_ 1 S — _ —____ — ___. _._.__ _____ _.�_ --- 17
10
i r 19I
1e Lo
16 21�
17 2.
231
Ie 24
20 z26
27
21
__.-_ .._.-___-_.—_—..___._— ••rt
22 2r,
23 30
31
24 7,
3
3:
27
4 f.
LG 38
10 t,
12
4
]7
ie .0
4"
f6 41.
JB 5f,
a1
•10 63
41 54
a:
42 5E
43 57
44 : - 51.
5f
45 Cf
46 61
47 52
63
4B 64
49 65
50 66
67
al 66
52 69
53 70
71
54 72
a� 73
RUN DATE: J4/08/86 PROGRAM COSTS BY DEPARTMENT PAGE NO 1
� i CITY OF SHAKOPEE
r
'
01 GENERAL FUND PERSONAL SERVICES COSTS OTHER TOTAL YTD
I' DM DEPARTMENT PROGRAM HOURS DOLLARS COSTSCOSTS APPRDP PERCENT,___.__
° 00 2ND AVE PARKING
000 GENERAL FUND +0 .00 5462.63 5462.63 .00 .0
DEPT TOTAL __T. .•-. .. . . ......0 .00 -...5462.63 ......_ ..... 5462.63 .00. _ .0
11 MAYOR 8 COUNCIL _
111 MAYOR L COUNCIL .0 521.00 1049.62 1576.62 41760.00 3.7-
�` �� 990 .0 4426.39 .00 4426.39 .00 .0
�= DEPT TOTAL .0 4953.39 1049.62 6003.01 41760.00 14.3
u ,
r " 12 CITY ADMINISTRATOR
+� 121 ADMINISTRATION ._-.-.._871.1 _ - 415681.96 ` 2409.09 _- 18091.05 66480.00 _27.2-
- ------
�� 122 COUNCIL B AGENDAS 57.0 1524.37 .00 1524.37 7535.00 20.2
988 OTHEI PAY .0 170.10 .00 170.10 .00 .0
991 66.5 577.02 .00577.02 .00 .0
992 , ,._, ._.._,....__... .43.2 --- - _ 697.29 .U0 697.29 .00 .0
993 25.5 349»86 .00 349.86 .00 .0
DEPT TOTAL � _. ____...__..1069.3__•_-___19000_.60 2409.09 21409.69-- _ 81355.00_-2f
13 CITY CLERK
131 GENERAL MANAGEMENT 478.2 6840.15 9594.21 16434.36 52634.00 3.1.2
132 ELECTIONS 9.5 149.50 1130.60- 981+10- 9985.00 9.8
133 LICENSING 2.5 39.35 .00 39.35 1250.00 3.1
134 OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS_ ____ 2.0 31.49 10.00 _ 41.49 1255.00 3.3_
135 COUNCIL 8 AGENDAS 38.7 516.02 .00 �516.02� 2410.00 21.4J
136 I R BONDS .0 .03 .00 .03 1205.00 .0
137 DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT 14.5 227.84 60.00 287.84 1200.00 23.9
988 OTHER PAY .0 19.13 __......_....... .00.._.._._ 19.13 .00 . . ..0 .-... -
!e. 991 1.0 - 12.50 .00 12.50 .00 .0
992 24.0 --- - --309.17-W__-_---- .00 309.17 -- _ .00
993 2.0 26.14 .00 26.14 .00 0
w DEPT TOTAL 572.4 8171.32 8533.61 16704.93 69939.00 23..8
x.
15 FINANCE
151 GEMERAL MANAGEMENT 196.0 4255.23 3924.42 8179.70 64650.00 12.6
152 ACCOJNTING 496.7 6039.29 6751.17_ 12790.46 52535.00 24.3_-_
153 PAYROLL 106.2 1146.18 418.25 1564.43 7805.00 20.0
154 FIXED ASSETS 16.0 123.51 3J1.63 425.14 2840.00 14.9
r 1 155 BUDGET 3.0 ._. _.67.76 .00 67.76 7310.00 .9
156 ASSESSMENTS 88.7 1641.05 15.00 1656.05 6070.00 27.2
- + 158 PERSONNEL 70.8 774.66 31.13 805.79 2865.00 28.1
988 OTHER PAT_ .0 356.24 .00 356.24 .00_ 0_
991 51.5 469.17 .00 469.17 .00 -.0 -�
+- 992 63.0 748.55 .00 748.55 .00 .0
9938.0 72.89 .00 72.89 .00 .0
w 998 _. .. _...- 4.5 ...._.... - 41.00 . ._.. ....._ .00 41.00 .00 _..O ..._.._. _
^,b1 )EPT TOTAL 1104.4 15735.53 11441.60 27177.18 144075.00 18.8
° _.EGAL COUNSEL
° 161 GENEIAL LEGAL SERVIC .0 .00 8996.49 8996.49 51950.00 17.3
d°- 163 PROSECJTIONS .0 .00 21i6.25 2756.25 .00 .0
�,�
RUN DATE: 04/03/86 PROGRAM COSTS BY DEPARTMENT PAGE NO 2
� j CITY OF SHAKOPEE
C t 01 GENERAL FUND PERSONAL SERVICES COSTS OTHER TOTAL YTD
ON DEPARTMENT PROGRAM HOURS DOLLARS COSTS COSTS APPROP PERCENT
.j
°i 165 LAYSJITS .0 .00 327.50 327.50 .00 .0
° DEPT TOTAL .0 .03 120dO.24 12080.24 51950.00 23.2
a;. 17 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN
171 GENERAL MANAGEMEVT 42.5 _ 1807.39_ 1.155.12 2962.51 17375.00 17.0
172 CODE ENFORCEMENT 46.0 - - 662.46 .00 - 662.46 4685.00 14.1
" 173 SUBDIVISION REVIEW 42.5 611.12 .00 611.12 3515.00 17.3
174 PLANNING COMM. MTG. 331.5 4110.91 69.35 4180.26 30825.00 13.5
175 LONG RANGE PLANNING 235.5 2424.63 25242.00 27666.63 4610.00 600.1
"I 176 RACETRACK 3B.0 542.66 .00 542.66 5865.00 9.2
117 PARKS 9.5 _ _ 164.24 .00 164.24 1755.00 9.3
° 178 SPECIAL PROJECTS 27.5 209.05 143.91 352.96 5180.00 6.1
" 988 OTHER PAY .0 423.49 .00 423.49 .00 .0
'• 991 61.0661.30 .00 661.30 .00 .0
992 72.0 .. _._._... 637,87 _ ._. ._. .00 637.87 .00 .0
�I 993 80.0 723.16 .00 723.16 .00 .0
998 32.0 _ 296.14 .00 296.14 .00 .0
"i DEPT TOTAL 1018.0 13274.42 26610.38 39884.80 74410.00 53.6
IB GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
181 CITY HALL 232.0 2199.64 2223.21 4422.85 31790.00 13.9
r � 182 LIBRARY 163.0 1652.53 1761.38 3413.91 16970.00 20.1
184 SR.CITIZEN CENTEZ 114.01202.82 654.25 1857.07 8160.00 21.1
988 OTHER PAY :D 15.42 - .od 15.42 .00 .0
991 29.5 212.11 .00 212.11 .00 .0
992 61.6 438.91 .00 438.91 .00 .0
973 22.0 161.96 .00 161.96 .00 .0
( DEPT TOTAL 622.1 5883.33 4638.84 10522.23 59520.00 17.6
22 INDUS TRIAL/C3MMERCIA
l •° 221 GENERAL MANAGEMENT .0 142.00 142.30 284.30 1000.00 28.4
DEPT TOTAL .0 142.00 142.30 284.30 1000.00 28.4
> 31 POLICE
lb 311 GENERAL MANAGEMENT 2171.3 5D306.65 32101.63 92408.28 231730.00 35.5
w 312 PATROL 3871.0 71648.80 3914.05 75562.85 509355.00 14.8
313 INVESTIGATION 467.0 8648.58 d3.d0 8732.38 80270.00 10.8
( < 314 JUVENILES 291.0 5148.15 148.80 5296.95 52775.00 10.0
43 315 COJRI TIME 101.0 2141.11 .00 2141.11 .00 .0
4. 316 SCHOOL LIAISON 126.3 2460.95 .00 2460.95 .00 .0
ie 319 CODE ENFORCEMENT 8.040.00 .00 40.00 5300.00 .l
331 GENERAL MANAGEMENT .p -.0061.03 __ 61.03 .00 .0--- -
i
'I 988 OTHER PAY .0 973.39 .00 973.39 .00 .0
b' 99L335.3 4930.11 .00 4930.11 .00 .0
i.' ..... - 992 375.4 5487.74 .00 5487.74 .OD .. _ 0 .. -._
993 217.5 3092.10 .00 3092.10 .00 .0
998 7.5 110.14 -00 110.14 .00 .0
DEPT TOTAL 7971.3 154987.72 36309.31 191291.03 879930.00 21.7
1 41 32 FI RE
°j jib
i
RUN DATE: 04/08/85 PROGRAM COSTS BY DEPARTMENT PAGE NO 3
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
+' ((s
a 01 GENERAL FUND PERSONAL SERVICES COSTS OTHER TOTAL YTD
DEPARTMENT PROGRAM __ ._-___•__... HOURS_.,.,__ :__DOLLARS COSTS,_ __-___-___._.COSTS APPRDP_.
321 GENEiAL MANAGEMENT 399.3 5799.83 18357.68 24157.51 245225.00 9.8
DEPT TOTAL 399.3 5799.83 18351.68 24151.51 245225.00 9.8
33 INSPECTION-HLDG-PLMiI
331 GENEiAL MANAGEMENT 533.9 4961.59 8551.97 13513.56 32120.00 42.0
332 PLAN REVIEW 78.0 1356.56 .00 1356.56 11475.00 11.8
C 333 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 167.3 3041.90 .00 3041.90 12160.00 23.8
334 PLMBG. & HTG.INSPECT 88.4 1613.38 .00 1613.38 26160.00 6.0
335 CODE ENFORCEMENT 9.7 122030 .00 122.30 3820.00 3.2
14 336 VALLEYFAIR 1.5 L8.90 .00 18.90 3820.00 .4
337_ CITY BUILDING_ MGT. ...... ..._ .-_9.0 185.53___x_.-_..- .00 - 185.53 ._ .00 .0
( ��' 338 RACETRACK 68 2 1252.11 .00 1252.11 .00 .0
s e _.
988 OTHER PAY .0 244.62 .00 244.6200
. .0
�• 991 _ 48.0 416.49 .00 416.49 .00 .0
+� 992 72.0 877.90 .00 871.90 .00 .0
' 993 10.5 171.34 .00 171.34 .00 .0
a. 998. -- -.._.__.._......_ .58.7 : t _945.95 .._.._.._. .00 -- - -945.95 - _... - - .00 _ .0____ _
a` DEPT TOTAL 1145.2 Y_ 15208.57 8551.97 23760.94 90755.00 - 26.1
+• 35 CIVIL DEFENSE
a> 351 GENERAL MANAGEMENT .0 .DO 242.61 242.61 2950.00 8..2
* DEPT TOTAL .0 .00 242.61 212.61 2950.00 8.2
36 ANIMAL CONTROL ---
�.1 361 GENERAL MANAGEMENT .0 .00 942.24 942.24 6770.00 13.9
DEPT TOTAL .0 .00 942.24 942.24 6170.00 13.9
41 ENGINEERIN
401 BLDG.PER 27.0- , 495.55 - " . _ .00
_--.. .._.- -- --__...495.55.. . .... . 4320.00_ ..-11.4._._.._...
403 DESIGN CRITERIA d ST 11.0 166.04 .00 166.04 2415.00 6.8
404 TRAINING 21.0 453.78 .00 453.78 6110.00 7.4
405 PAVEMENT PRESERVATTO 9.0 194.49 .00 194.49 10940.00 1.7
406 CITY COUNCIL PROJECT 18.0 . 286.04 .00 286.04 7675.00 3.7
407 MISCELLANEOUS 124.7 1751.93 .00 1751.93 7840.00 22.3
408 STATE AID (MN/DOT) _ 20.5 365.63 .00 365.63 3855.00 9.4
411 GENERAL MANAGEMENT236.5 5904.83 5148.57 11053.40 58025.00 -T4.0
412 INSPECTIONS .0 .04 .00 .04 490.00 .0
414 PLAT REVIEW 6.0172.96 .00 172.96 1705.00 10.1
_ 418 FILING - 8.0 ... „- 77.34 .00 77.34 .00 .0 .
500 OTHER IMPROV 47.5 829.58 .00 829.58 .00 .0
516 VALLEY PARK.DRAINAGE ' _ 2.0 43.22 .00 43.22 9275.00 .4
521 UPPER VALLEY DRAINAG 18.0 344.40 .00 384.40 10140.00 3.7
522 HOLMES ST.LATERALS 97.0 1832.81 .00 1832.81 5340.00 34.3
528 AD-HOC COMM 14.0 302.51 .00 302.57 .00 .0
• 534 SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTIO 35.0 425.70 .00 425.70 .00 .0
537 4TH AVE FILMORE i0 S 250.0 4231.90 .00 4231.90 12255.00 34.5
' 539 2ND AVE PARKING_. ._.;_._:.__..._ _6.0 129.65_; ': _00 -- - 129.65 .00 _._0_
>% 544 VALLEY PARK DR/12TH 1.0 9.67 .00 9.67 .00
>= 545 T.H. 101 BY-PASS ROW 30.0 427.77 6.20 433.97 .00 .0
>• 546 101 INTERSECTIONS 8.2 145.55 .00 145.56 .00 .0 .I
K r +
RUN DATE: 04/03/86 PROGRAM COSTS BY DEPAiTMENT PAGE NO 4
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
01 GENERAL FUN] PERSONAL SERVICES COSTS OTHER TOTAL YTD
34 DEPARTMENT PROGRAM HOURS DOLLARS COSTS COSTS APPROP PERCENT
547 Cl 83/CURB/WIDENING 8.0 81.79 .00 81.79 .00 .0
550 TIMBER TRAILS 36.5 569.21 .00 569.21 .DO .0
'j 551 VALLEY PARK OR NO 37.5 729.94 .00 729.94 .00 .D
552 169 3RIDGE-JUNCTION 64.5 1208.63 .00 1208.63 .00 .0
° 988 OTtiER PAY .0 820.37 .DO 820.31 .00 .0
991 10.0 - - - --126.06- _._.. .. . .00 -. _. . . 126.06 .00 .0
992 114.0 1514.46 .00 1514.46 .00 .0
993 20.0 247.34 .00 241.34 .00 .0
998 3.0 43.01 .00 43.0[ .00 .0
DEPT TOTAL 1285.9 23972.33 5154.17 29127.10 150755.00 19.3
_ -----
42 STREET B ALLY MAINT
421 GENERAL MANAGEMENT 422.0 17712.83 12340.30 30053.13 168070.00 17.8
422 TREE & LIMB P/UP 32.5 463.19 .00 463.19 5945.00 7.7
426 EOUI347-NT MAINTENANC 247.6 3447.94 2814.96 6332.90 67010.00 9.4
427 STAE_T & ALLEY MAINT 83.5 1192.89 128.58 1921.47 69110.00 2.7
429 BITUMINOUS STREET RE 157.5 2234.01 .00 2234.01 215160.00 1.0
431 SIGNS 119.0 1722.27 1313.43 3095.70 6525.00 47.4
432 SNOW REMOVAL 1060.9 15004.71 1313.98 16358.75 41570.00 39.3
433 SANDING STREETS 281.6 3927.74 849.00 4816.74 5900.00 81.6
988 OTHER PAY .0 1558.60 .00 1558.60 .00 .0
991 98.0 1182.60 .00 1182.60 .00 .0
992 120.0 1477.71 .00 1477.71 .00 .0
993 130.0 1788.44 .00 1788.44 .00 .0
998 118.5 1627.82 .00 1627.82 .00 .0
DEPT TOTAL 2871.1 53340.81 19510.25 72911.06 586850.00 12.4
44 SHOP
441 GENERAL MANAGEMENT 51.5 1478.00 1038.26 2566.26 34640.00 7.4
443 MAINT. & REPAIR-STRE 319.2 4480.60 .00 4480.60 8220.00 54.5
444 MAINT. & REPAIR-PARK 36.5 303.60 .00 303.60 815.00 37.2
1 445 MAINT. & REPAIR-POLI 40.0 569.38 .00 569.38 1265.00 45.0
i 446 MAIN[. & REPAIR-AOMI 4.5 64.00 .00 64.00 290.00 22.0
, I 447 MAINT. K REPAIR-JT.R 8.0 114.52 .00 114.52 300.00 38.1
448 MAINT. & REPAIR-SPUC 7.0 _ 100.28 .DO 100.28 90.00 111.4
~I 988 OTHER ?AY .0 191.39 .00 191.38 .00 .0
991 40.0 497.20 .00 497.20 .00 .0
992 16.0 190.24 .00 190.24 .00 .0
993 16.0 ..._... 190.24 ....__ ._ .00 190.24 .00 .0
998 51.5 705.28 .00 705.28 .00 .0
DEPT TOTAL 596.2 8884.72 1038.26 9972.98 45620.00 21.8
•-I 45 STORM SEWER
451 MAINTENANCE 60.0 903.66 .00 903.66 .00 .0
..
DEPT TOTAL 60.0 903.66 .00 903.66 .DO .0
46 WEED CONTROL - - - - -- -
DEPT TOTAL __ _.- -. - -_•---- .-- -- _..... ....- _ _ .0 .00 .00 .00 1500.00 .0
»� 51 SWIMMING POOL ":
RUN DATE: 04/08/80 PROGR4M COSTS BY OEPAiTMENT PAGE NO 5
( j CITY OF SHAKOPEE
( I'� 01 GENERAL FUND PERSONAL SERVICES COSTS OTHER TOTAL YTD
ON DEPARTMENT PROGRAM _ ._._ HOURS ,. DOLLARS ,_•,COSTS __- _ COSTS APPROP. PERCENT
( 611 GENEiAL MANAGEMENT .0 1036.00 96/.11 2003.11 14650.00 13.6
618 WATER SLIDE .0 .00 59.50 59.50 3350.00 1.7
DEPT TOTAL .0 1036.00 1026.61 2062.61 56515.00 3.6
62 PARKS
0 621 GENERAL MANAGEMENTf119.5 8849.37 2532.65 11382.02 124280.00 9.1,, 622 PARK MAINT. & CONST. 2.0 24.42 829.09 853.51 12545.00 6.8
626 TENNIS COURT MAINT. .0 .00 13.00 13.00 2620.00 .4
628 P.W. BLDG MAINT/CONS 191.5 2567.05 - 293.98 2861.03 8920.00 32.0
629 PARK EQUIP MAINT/CON 210.0 2844.73 .00 2844.73 9470.00 30.0
630 PARK BLDG MAINT/CONS .-_..__133.3 _1891.97._ „ 104.00 1995.97 18885.00____,10.5_..___ -
631 PARK DEPT EQUIP MAIN 119.0 1483.37 4b8.44 1951.81 6165.00 31.6
632 RINKS MAINT/CONST 567.1 7547.78 .00 7547.78 12855.00 58.7
633 SNOW REMOVAL LOT/WAL 42.0 567.61 .00 567.67 2780.00 20.4
988 OTHER PAY .0 1086.03 .00 1086.03 .00 .0
991 32.0 362.56 .00 362.56 .00 .0
992.- _ _ ..._............._ .80.0.,---- _ 891.36 - - -._.00 --- _891.36 -- .00
993 114.2 1307.16 .00 1307.16 .00 .0
998 70.7 805.62 .00 805.62 .00 .0
DEPT TJTAL 1681.3 30229.03 4241.16 34470.25 216405.00 15.9
i 65 FORESTRY
! 651 GENERAL MANAGEMENT. . _ .0 416.00_- _ - .00 416.00 4240.00 9.8^_
-.._�.._.__. ---• _...
'I( 653 LIMB PICK-UP B REMOV 17.0 241.00 .00 241.00 3640.00 6.6
II 654 CONFERENCES 6 EDJCAT 22.0 304.55 .00 304.55 125.00 243.6
655 TRIMMING 12.0 168.60 .00 168.60 605.00 27.8
DEPT TOTAL 51.0 , 1130.15 .00 1130.15 11315.60 6.5
' ,__j2__,GARBAGE COLLECTION
721 GENERAL MANAGEMENT 11.0 237.70 28145.42 28383.12 167900.00 16.9
DEPT TOTAL 11.0 231.70 28145.42 28383.12 167900.00 16.9
,..�
91 UNALLOCATED
911 UNALLOCATED .0 .00 22303.57 22303.57 255200.00 8.7
®EPI TOT 4L _ . - _.._............_ ..__..0.t.! :: _•00._.._. _: _.22303.57_-....---....22303.51 __. 255200.00 _....___8.7
FUND TOTAL 20458.5 362891.28 218302.16 581193.44 3247699.00 17.8
ti
RUN DATE: 04/0:4/86 PROGRAM COSTS BY DEPARTMENT PAGE NO 6
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
11 COMMUNITY SERVICES PERSONAL SERVICES COSTS OTHER TOTAL YTD
JN DEPARTMENT PROGRAM HOURS DOLLARS COSTS COSTS APPROP PERCENT
81 RECREATION ADMIN.
811 GENEiAL MANAGEMENT 1002.5 15148.21 5931.71 21055.92 53025.00 39.7
812 PARK ADMINISTRATION 7.0 158.62 .00 158.62 1650.00 9.6
814 GYMNASTICS 24.3 165.20 .00 165.20 .00 .0
815 RECREATION AOMINISTR 853.0 _ 5144.90 .00 5144.90 50195.00 10.2
816 EDUCATION ADMINISTRA 251.5 2416.46 .00 2416.46 41175.00 5.7
817 SWIMMING ADMINISTRAT 4.0 90.64 .00 90.64 23340.00 .3
988 OTHEi PAY .0 499.23 .00 489.23 .00 .0
991 14.3 112.13 .00 112.13 .00 .0
992 90.0 915.38 .00 915.38 .00 .0
993 13.7 94.53 .00 94.53 .00 .0
DEPT TJTAL 2260.3 24795.30 5901.71 30703.01 169985.00 18.0
FUND TOTAL 2260.3 24795.30 5907.11 30703.01 169985.00 18.0
ii
j:
RUN DATE: 04/08/86 PROGR4M COSTS BY DEPARTMENT PAGE NO 7
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
12 FED. REVENUE SHARING PERSONAL SERVICES COSTS OTHER TOTAL YTO
D4DEPARTMENT PROGRAM ..-- -_,-.---.- HOURS DOLLARS ..COSTS_ COSTS APPROP, .,-_. PERCENT._-.__ .
r
OD. 2ND AVE PARKING
>I DEPT TUTAL .0 .00 .00 .00 152100.00 .0
i ,
FUND TOTAL .0 - .00 .00 .00 152100.00 .0
1
_ ----------
1
---------
.-------- - -- -
i
i.
I .•
� Ir
,.V
RUN DATE; 04/09/86 PROGRAM COSTS BY DEPARTMENT PAGE NO 8
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
13 PARK RESERV= FUND PERSONAL SERVICES COSTS OTHER TOTAL YTD
DY DEPARTMENT PROGRAM HOURS DOLLARS COSTS COSTS APPKOP PERCENT
00 2ND AVE PARKING
000 GEVERAL FUND _ .0 .00 2957.68 2967.68 114900.00 2.5
DEPT TOTAL .0 .00 29ti7.68 2961.68 114900.00 2.5
19 NRA
Yr DEPT TOTAL _. ._ .0 - TUU - ........... .. .00 .00 .00 .0
` 41 ENGINEERING
DEPT TOTAL .0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0
62 PARKS
DEPT TOTAL a0... - -- X00 .00 .00 .00 .0
FUND TOTAL .0 .00 2307.68 2967.68 114900.00 2.5
. j
i'
i '
1
RUN DATE: 64/03/86 PROGRAM COSTS 8Y DEPARTMENT PAGE NO 9
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
(�I 14 TRAN31T PERSONAL SERVICES COSTS OTHER TOTAL YTD
DNOEPARTMCNT PROGRAM.-_,-__- HOURS..- COSTS COSTS APPROP
__._.�DOLLAR� C
PERCENT -- -
IA�
14 TRANSIT
141 TRANSIT .77.31 .00 7.31 .00 .0
142 DIAL-A-RIDE 95.0 801.18 10483.74 11284.92 135175.00 8.3
143 VAN POOL 91.5 798.12 5990.98 6789.10 57855.00 1107
DEPT TOTAL _. ._....... 193.2.•..,_ 1606.61, ;_;,16414.12-•,___,___18081.33 . 193030.009.3 -_______..
FUND TOTAL 193.2 1606.61 16474.72 18081.33 193030.00 9.3
I_
`I
`I
.I
I .
RUN DATE: 04/08/d6 PROGRAM COSTS BY DEPARTMENT PAGE NO 10
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
15 HRA PERSONAL SERVICES COSTS OTHER TOTAL YTD
JY DEPARTMENT PROGRAM HOURS DOLLARS COSTS COSTS APPROP PERCENT
19 HRA
191 GENERAL MANAGEMENT 198.3 3764.06 361.09 4125.15 22995.00 17.9
196 4TH & MINNESOTA 10.0 420.00 .00 420.00 .00 .0
988 OTHER PAY .0 20.48 .00 20.48 .00 .0
991 7.0100.52 .00 100.52 .00 .0
992 24.0.._ ..._. __.. 339.69 .00 339.69 .00 .0
993 35.0 502.60 .00 502.60 .00 .0
998 18.0 258.48 .00 258.48 .00 .0
DEPT TOTAL 352.3 5405.83 361.09 5766.92 22995.00 25.0
FUND TOTAL 352.3 5405.83 361.09 5166.92 22995.00 25.0
I
i
I
_ RUN DATE: 04/08/85 PROGR4M COSTS BY DEPARTMENT PAGE NO 11
CITY OF SHAKUPEE
�!I 16 CABLE PERSONAL SERVICES CDSTS. OTHER TOTAL YTD
ON DEPARTMLNT PROGRAM _ _. HOURS _DOLLAR S______•_,_.COST$.._._ ...___ _-. COSTS APPRUP . .- PERCENT-_.....-
23 CABLE COMMU'TICAT IONS
231 G7NERAL MANAGEMEYT 94.0 964.01 155.92 1119.93 21870.00 5.1
DEPT TOTAL 94.0 . 964.01 155.92 1119.93 21810.00 5.1
FUND TGTAL _ 94.0.:.:: 9.64e01 .._.._155.92._•
- .. _.._._...1.119.93 .--...- ..21870.00.---'---�.1__...__.._
,
I I
L1.
i
3
F I
L Ff
KRASS R MONROE CHARTERED
327 South Marschall Read JAL: 2 7 IS86
Shakopee, MN 55379
City of Shakopee BILLING DATE 01-24-86
129 East 1st Avenue
Shakopee, Mn 55379 S U M M A R Y
Account Number Client Name Balance
RE Line
SHA11373002-1 City of Shakopee $719. 50
General
SHA11373114-1 City of Shakopee $0. 00
Ice Arena
SHA11373157-1 City of Shakopee-Dev $54. 00
Racetrack Tax .Increment District
SHA11373172-1 City of Shakopee $81. 50
Housing Alliance Project
SHA11373176-1 City of Shakopee $0. 00
Richard' s Pub Suspension
SHA11373177-1 City of Shakopee $0. 00
Mining CUP
SHA11373182-1 City of Shakopee $575. 00
Canterbury Aots Bands
SHA11373183-1 City of Shakopee (RF) $225. 00
Toro Bonds
SHA11373184-1 City of Shakopee $601. 96
condemn. for road to P. H. addtn.
SHAII373185-1 City of Shakopee $0. 00
Alltech Engineering Carp.
SHA11373186-1 City of Shakopee $56. 00
Silverhawk Assessment Appeal
SHA1373157A-1 City of Shakopee $196. 25
Racetrack. Tax Increment-Condemnatio
SHA1373177A-1 City of Shakopee $44. 00
Scott Cty. Lumber
PAGE L
l `
City of Shakopee BILLING DATE 01-84-86
129 East 1st Avenue
Shakopee, Mn 55379 S U M M A R Y
Account Number Client Name Balance
RE Line
SHA51373118-1 City of Shakopee $299. 50
Wangerin (Bill to K Mart TID)
SHA51373134-1 City of Shakopee $284. 50
Fire Truck Problem
SHA51373144-1 City of Shakopee $376, 25
Chard
SHA51373153-1 City of Shakopee $196. 50
Hardrives Suit
SHAS1373011-1 City of Shakopee $1, 200. 25
Prosecutions
TOTAL $4, 910. 21
'
]
KRASS 8 MJNROE CHARTERED |
327 Soutn Marschall Road ' �8&I
wvvn
Shakooee` MN 55379
'
�
C,[Ty OF
- '
_
/
Citv of Smakooee BILLING DATE 22-28-66 |
129 East 1st Avenue �
�
Shakooee~ Mn 55379 S U M M A R Y
Account Numner Client Name Balanuc
RE Line
SHA11373002-1 City of Shakooee W5. 52)
General
SHA11373157-1 City of Shakooee_Dev $0. 00
Racetrack Tax Increment District
SHA11373172-1 City of Shakooee s0. 00
Housino Alliance Progect
SHA11373179-1 City of Shakooee $300' 00
Scottland IDB' s (BILL TO APPLICANT)
SHA11373182-1 City of Shakooee $50. 00
Canteroury Pots Donos
SHA11373183-1 City of Shakooee (RF) $0. 00
Toro Bonds
SHA11373184-1 City of Shakooee $642. 321
concemn for rd to PH Addn (BILL APP)
' SHA11373186-1 City of Shakooee $125. 00
SiI*erhaw4 Assessment Aooeal
SKA113731B7-1 City of Shakooee $124. 00
101 Bywass
SHA1373157A-1 City of Shakooee %25' 0o,
Racetrack Tax Increment-Conoemnatio
GHA1373177A-1 City of Shakooee $0' 00
Scott Cty. Lumber
SH051373118-1 City of Shakooee $I87. 510
Wanperin (Bill to K Mart TID)
SHA51373134-1 City of Shakooee s96' 50
Fire Truck Problem
9 12;3 9 T
10 Aq.T3 T T T Z L T T 0 Uri S
T--tii7 TZLZ T7=UHS
aUT 7
a=U i?T I:- NJ r!,Nl A57
E.LCf:--'-a
allUaAH 4S 45E3 GIFT
E?-a 77-7'0 71�j(l S%41-17T;4 aaC!:-",IVUCS -D A
KRASS & MONROE CHARTERED
327 South Marschall Road
Shakopee, MN 55379
City of Shakopee BILLING DATE 03-27-86
S5-5 77
S U M M A R Y
Account Number Client Name Balance
RE Line
SHA11373O02-1 City of Shakopee $186. 00
General
SHAII373179-1 CIty of Shakopee $0. 00
Scottland IDB' s (BILL TO APPLICANT)
SHA11373182-1 City of Shakopee $46. 50
Canterbury Apts Bonds
SHA11373184-1 City of Shakopee $273, 00
condemn for rd to PH Addn (BILL APP)
SHA11373185-1 City of Shakopee $232. 50
Alltech Engineering Corp.
SHAII373186-1 City of Shakopee $348. 50
Silverhawk Assessment Appeal
SHA11373167-1 City of Shakopee $0, 00
101 Bypass
SHA11373186-1 City of Shakopee $124. 50
NSP Dispute over pales
SHA1373157A-1 City of Shakopee $12. 50
Racetrack Tax Increment-Condemnatio
SHA51373118-1 City of Shakopee $514. 50
Wanoerin (Bill to K Mart TID)
SHA51373134-1 City of Shakopee $0, 00
Fire Truck Problem
SHA51373144-1 City of Shakopee $25, 00
Chard
SHA51373153-1 City of Shakopee $216. 50
Hardrives Suit
PAGE 2
City of Shakopee BILLING DRTE 03-27-86
S U M M A R Y
Account Number Client Name Balance
RE Line
SHA81373011-1 CitY of Shakopee $753. 50
Prosecutions
TOTAL $2, 735. 00
TENTATIVE AGENDA
ADJ ,REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APRIL 15, 1986
Mayor Reinke presiding
11 Roll Call at 7 : 00 P .M.
2] Recess for H.R.A. meeting
31 Reconvene
4] Reading by Mayor Reinke of City' s Non-Discrimination Policy
5] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers
6] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS
7] Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterick are
considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by
one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items
unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will
be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal
sequence on the agenda. )
Approval of Minutes of March 20, March 25 , and April 1 , 1986
9] Communications :
.h a] -Petitiozfrom Residents re : Highway 101 Traffic Signals, Crosswalks
t-b] Request from Liquor Licensees re : Dram Shop Insurance
tc] Mike Sullivan ,re : Project Lifesaver
fid] Resignation of Electrical Inspector
10] Public Hearings : None
11] Boards and Commissions :
Downtown Committee :
�. a] Landscaping of Second Avenue Parking Lot
Planning Commission:
t b] Driveway Access onto CSAH-17 - Request by Joe Link
{c] Final Plat of Shakopee Valley Square 1st Add 'n. , which lies
East of Marschall Road and North of 1st Avenue
t- d] Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework: Southwest
Communities Action
Racetrack Land Use Study Committee :
, e] Racetrack Plan
12] Reports from Staff: [Council will take a 10 minute break around 9 :OOPM1
-{-a] Amendment to Supplemental Indenture 1984-A2 $26 , 000,000 Sports
Facility Bonds
-�-b] Ernst & Whinney Costing and Staffing Study - bring study
c] City Administrator' s Staffing Recommendations - bring 8j from 4/1
TENTATIVE AGENDA
April 15 , 1986
Page -2-
12] Reports from Staff continued:
d] Community Development Director Vacancy - bring 8k from 4/1 agen
e] City Hall Office Relocation - bring 81 from 4/1 agenda
f] Reorganization of Industrial Commercial Commission - bring
item 4 from 4/8 agenda
- g] Amendment to Shakopee Comprehensive Plan Urban Sanitary Sewer
Service< Area
-+h] Nominations to Shakopee Community Access Corp . Board of Directo
ti
I Nominations to Housing Advisory and Appeals Board
] Downtown Parking
* k] Holmes Street Storm Sewer Lateral Project - Authorizing Ad for
�1] Intersection of CSAH 83 and T.H. 101
m] 13th Avenue Mapping Project
--fin] Engineering Inspector Position
jo] Preliminary LAWCON/LCMR Application - memo on table
p] Approve Bills in Amount of $229 , 867. 20
me ] AIS Vote Counter (Scanner)
P, ] Screening Process for Hiring Community Development Director
*s] Removal of Foreman from Teamsters Union Local No. 320 Public
Works
-�`t] City Hall Siting Committee Selection of Architectural Firm
.�u] Contract for Electrical Inspections
131 Resolutions and Ordinances:
a] Ord. No. 184, Imposing A Moratorium On Development of Certain i-
t b]
_.t- b] Res. No. 2543 , Setting A Public Hearing On Shakopee Valley
Square Tax Increment District No. 6
- ] Res. No . 2542 , Ordering Report on Improvement to 13th Avenue
Between CR 89 and East Shakopee City Limits
] Res. No . 2541 , Resolution of Appreciation to Dawn Schwingler
*e] Res . No . 2540, Resolution of Appreciation to Lauren Sorenson
14] Other Business :
t a]
b]
c]
15] Adjourn.
John K. Anderson
City Administrator
TENTATIVE AGENDA
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota
Adjourned Regular Session April 15 , 1986
Chairman Wampach presiding:
1. Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M.
2. Promissory Notes Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization
Project:
a) Thomas and Susan Johnson
b) Jane Wostrel VanMaldeghem
3 . Shakopee Valley Square Tax Increment Project Res. # 86-1
4 . Other Business
5 . Adjourn to May 6, 1986
Barry- A. Stock
Administrative Aide
JULIUS A. COLLER, IT .!
JULIUS A.COLLER ATTORNEY AT LAw 612-445-1244
ISS9-1940
2 1 1 WEST FIRST AVENUE
SHAHOPEE, MINNESOTA
553Z9
MEMO
To: Shakopee City Council
From: Julius A. Coller, II, City Attorney
In re: HRA 4th & Minnesota Revitalization Project
Date: April 9, 1986
INTRODUCTION
Council has inquired if the Promissory Note and Mortgage given by Jane I.
Wostrel on December 17, 1980 in connection with the purchase of certain
property in the Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project
requires continuous residency on the property by the mortgagor during the
life of the mortgage.
BACKGROUND
The first agreement entered into between the City and the purchaser in each
instance is a purchase agreement. It is silent as to any residence require-
ment. All that the purchase agreement provides is that if the property is
sold within 5 years of the date of the purchase, it will be subject to a lien
payable to the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the value of
the lot.
The next step in the transaction was the delivery of the deed of conveyance and
the making and signing by the grantee in said deed of a mortgage and a promissory
note running to the Hdusing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Shakopee. These documents supercede the Purchase Agreement and form the
agreement between the City and the purchaser.
The mortgage provides that the owner will pay to the City the amount of the
mortgage according to the terms of the promissory note of even date and when the
payment is made and all agreements in the mortgage are kept andperformed the
mortgage will be null and void and it is to be released.
There is a special clause typed in the mortgage as distinguished from the
printed matter of the document which provides that "no part of the mortgage
need be repaid unless and until the mortgagor conveys any legal or equitable
interest in the encumbered property. Moreover, each year on the anniversary
date of the mortgage, the principal balance shall be reduced by 20% automatically
without any payment by the mortgagor so that 5 years from the date of this mort-
gage providing the mortgagor has not conveyed any legal or equitable title in the
encumbered property, there shall be remaining no amount due and owing under the
mortgage and the mortgage shall be released by the mortgagee."
Continued ownership is all that is required. Residency is not mentioned anywhere
in the mortgage. The only reference to residency anywhere is in the note which
provides in part that "This note shall terminate at the end of 5 years of such
residency." All this says is that the note shall in any event terminate at the
end of 5 years of "such residency". But nowhere in either the note or the
2 -
Shakopee City Council
In re: HRA 4th & Minnesota Revitalization Project
April 9, 1986
mortgage is there any requirement of continued residency to keep the
agreement viable.
OPINION
In my opinion there is no residency requirement. All that is necessary to keep
the agreement in good standing is to retain ownership for the full period of
time and not convey any legal or equitable interest in the encumbered property
within the 5 year period.
cJULIUS A. COLLER, II
JULIU5 A.COLLER ATTORNEY AT LAW
18S9_1940 612-aa5-1244
2 1 1 W E S T F I R S T AVENUE
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
55379 ;
V
MEMO
To: Shakopee City Council
From: Julius A. Coller, II, City Attorney
In re: HRA 4th & Minnesota Revitalization Project
Date; April 10, 1986
INTRODUCTION
The Council has inquired if the Promissory Note and Mortgage given by Susan and
Thomas Johns.on for Lot 3, Block 3, -Macey Second Addition requires continued owner-
ship during the life of the mortgage in order to escape repayment.
BACKGROUND
The first agreement entered into between the City and the purchaser in each
instance is a purchase agreement. It is silent as to any residence require-
ment. All that the purchase agreement provides is that if the property is
sold within 5 years of the date of the purchase, it will be subject to a lien
payable to the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the value of
the lot.
The next step in the transaction was the delivery of the deed of conveyance and
the making and signing by the grantee in said deed of a mortgage and a promissory
note running to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Shakopee. These documents supercede the Purchase Agreement and form the
agreement between the City and the purchaser.
The mortgage provides that the owner will pay to the City the amount of the
mortgage according to the terms of the promissory note of even date and when the
payment is made and all agreements in the mortgage are kept and performed the
mortgage will be null and void and it is to be released.
There is a special clause typed in the -mortgage as distinguished from the
printed matter of the document which provides that "no part of the mortgage
need be repaid unless and until the mortgagor conveys any legal or equitable
interest in the encumber/property. Moreover, each year on the anniversary
date of the mortgage, the principal balance shall be reduced by 20% automatically
without any payment by the mortgagor so that 5 years from the date of this mort-
gage providing the mortgagor has not conveyed any legal or equitable title in the
encumbered property, there shall be remaining no amount due and owing under the
mortgage and the mortgage shall be released by the mortgagee."
Continued ownership is a requirement.
OPINION
In my opinion the Johnsons may not sell the property before the full five year
period. If they do, they must repay to the City 20% of the original mortgage
for each year their ownership falls short of the mandatory five year ownership
requirement.
�3
MEMO TO: Shakopee HRA Commissioners
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Admin. Aide
RE: Shakopee Valley Square Tax Increment Project -
Resolution No. 86-1
DATE: April 11, 1986
Introduction•
On March 25 , 1986 the Shakopee HRA and City Council directed
staff to proceed with the preparation of legal documents for
the Shakopee Valley Tax Increment Project. This phase has now
been completed and it would now be appropriate for the HRA to
adopt the Modified Housing and Redevelopment plan for Minnesota
River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 including
Tax Increment financing plan for Tax Increment Districts Nos. 3 ,
5 , and 6 . (See attachment #1) . This action can be accomplished
by approving Resolution No. 86-1. (See attachment #2 ) . It
would also be appropriate for the City Council to call for a
public hearing on the proposed establishment of Tax Increment
Financing District No. 6. (Resolution No. 2543 , see attachment
#3 ) . All legal documents have been prepared by O' Connor & Hannan
and reviewed by Rod Krass our City Attorney.
Background:
On April 8, 1986 City staff met with representatives from
O' Connor & Hannan and the Bakken group to discuss various elements
of the proposed Shakopee Valley Square Development. Following
is a synopsis of the major points being discussed for inclusion
into the development agreement for Shakopee Valley Square.
Fiscal Disparities
Initially, the financing plan proposed for the Shakopee
Valley Square Project did not generate enough assessors market
value to, cover the cost of fiscal disparities. The Bakken group
has tentatively agreed to take the appropriate steps to increase
their debt service so that the fiscal disparities will be paid
out of the taxing district. We are exploring the level of assessed
valuation needed to support fiscal disparities in the district.
Security
Two letters of credit will be required by the Bakken group
during this project. The first, a 10 ,000 letter of credit to
be supplied by the Bakken group by April 15, 1986. This letter
of credit will be used in the event of default to cover any
administrative and legal costs by the City in the initial stages
before sale of the bonds.
The second letter of credit will be supplied by the Bakken
group when actual bonds are sold for the project. This letter
of credit will be a revolving letter of credi�: to cover additional
expenses incurred by the City when the bonds are sold, until
the buildings are constructed and the flow of income from the
district assured. Springsted is help+• - to determine the most
appropriate amount to cover. the City' s potential losses if the
developer does not perform. This letter of credit will be incor-
porated into the redevelopment contract which the City Council
will have prior to the public hearing.
Timing of Payments
Two options are being discussed for the provision of dollars
( $330 , 000 ) from the City to the Bakken group for the project.
The first option would be to supply the money to the Bakken
group on the issuance of a certificate of: completion for the
entire project. Under this scenario the Bakken group would
be assessed at 800 of the assessed value of the project in 1987
payable 1988 and 100% of the assessed value of the project in
1988 payable 1989 .
The second option would be to provide 50% of the money
to the Bakken group on January 1, 1987 or when the motel and
restaurant are completed (whichever is later) and the remaining
50% upon the issuance of the certificate of completion. Under
this scenario the Bakken group would be assessed at 100% of
the assessed value of the project on January 1, 1987 payable
1988 .
A finanical analysis incorporating these issues and alternatives
is being run by Springsted at this time. The outcome of the
runs will determine the appropriate course of action for the
aforementioned issues.
Prior to the HRA' s adoption of the Tax Increment Financing
Plan for Tax Increment District No. 6 , appropriate documentation
satisfying the criteria for the establishment of a Redevelopment-
District
edevelopment
District must be supplied by the Bakken group and approved by
our City Attorney. This information will be supplied prior
to the HRA adopting the project on the proposed project.
It would now be appropriate for the HRA to recommend to
City Council that a public hearing be set to hear comments on
the Shakopee Valley Square Tax Increment Project.
Action Requested:
HRA
1. Move to approve Resolution No. 86-1 amending the Modified
Housing and Redevelopment Plan relating to the Minnesota
River Valley Housing and Development Plan relating to the
Minnesota River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project
No. 1, and amending the Tax Increment Financing Plans relating
to Tax Increment Districts No. 2 through 5 within the project
area and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District
No. 6 within the project area and the Tax Increment Financing
Plan relating thereto.
2. Request City Council to set a public hearing for May 20 ,
1986 to hear comments on the Shakopee Valley Square Tax
Increment Project.
r.
City Council
Move to approve Resolution No. 2543 calling for a public
hearing on May 20, 1986 on the proposed amendment to the Redevel-
opment Plan relating to Minnesota River Valley Housing and Rede-
velopment Project No. 1; The proposed amendment to the Tax Increment
Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 2
through 5 ; the proposed establishment of Tax Increment Financing
District No. 6 and adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan.
Attachment #1
MODIFIED HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR
MINNESOTA RIVER VALLEY
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1
INCLUDING
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS
FOR
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NOS. 3, 5 AND 6
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
May 20 , 1986
(Tax Increment District Nos . 1 , 2 and 4
Will Be Inserted At A Later Time)
This document was drafted by: O' CONNOR & HANNAN
3800 IDS Tower
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
612/341-3800
MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN
Based upon the statutory authority described in the
Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan attached hereto and
the public purpose findings by the Commissioners and for the
purpose of fulfilling the Authority ' s housing and redevelop-
ment objectives as set forth in the Modified Housing and
Redevelopment Plan, the Commissioners have created, estab-
lished and designated the Minnesota River Valley Housing and
Redevelopment Project No. 1 pursuant to and in accordance
with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes , Sections
462 . 411 through 462 .716, inclusive, as amended ( the "Housing
and Redevelopment Act" ) .
The following municipal action was taken in connection
therewith:
January 2, 1979: The Redevelopment Plan for Valley
Industrial Park Redevelopment Project No. 1 was adopted
by the City Council .
July 17, 1979 : The Redevelopment Plan for Valley Indus-
trial Park Redevelopment Project No. 1 was modified by
the City Council by expansion of the geographic area.
February 28, 1984 : The Redevelopment Plan for Valley
Industrial Park Redevelopment Project No. 1 was further
modified by the City Council by expansion of the project
area and redesignation as Minnesota River Valley Housing
and Redevelopment Project No. 1.
August 7, 1984 : The Redevelopment Plan for Minnesota
River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 was
further modified by the City Council to incorporate Tax
Increment Districts Nos . 3 and 5 and include increased
project costs .
May 20 , 1986 : The Redevelopment Plan for Minnesota
River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 was
further modified by the City Council to incorporate the
Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment District
No. 6 and include increased project costs.
The following municipal action was taken with regard to
the Tax Increment Districts comprising Minnesota River
Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 :
Tax Increment District No. 1 : (K-Mart)
(Redevelopment Plan to be added at a later time)
"Grandfathered" tax increment district
Tax Increment District No. 2 : (Elderly Highrise)
(To be added at a later time)
Tax Increment District No. 3 : (Downtown Commercial
Rehab)
June 29 , 1982 : The Tax Increment Financing Plan
for Tax Increment District No. lA within Downtown
Redevelopment Project No. 1 was adopted by the City
Council .
August 7 , 1984 : The Tax Increment Financing Plan
for Tax Increment District No. lA within Downtown
Redevelopment Project No. 1 was modified and re-
designated as Tax Increment District No. 3 within
Minnesota River Valley Housing and Redevelopment
Project No. 1 by the City Council.
Tax Increment District No. 4 : (Racetrack)
(To be added at a later time)
Tax Increment District No. 5 : (Downtown Commercial
Rehab continued)
August 7 , 1984 : The Tax Increment Financing Plan
for Tax Increment District No. 5 within Minnesota
River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No.
1 was adopted by the City Council .
Tax Increment District No. 6 : (Shakopee Valley Motel)
May 20 , 1986 : The Tax Increment Financing Plan for
TEx Increment District No. 6 within Minnesota River
Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 was
adopted by the City Council .
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(This Table of Contents is not part of the Modified
Housing and Redevelopment Plan and is only for convenience
of reference . )
PAGE
SECTION I . MODIFIED HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR MINNESOTA RIVER VALLEY HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1
Subsection 1 . 1 . Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1
Subsection 1 . 2 . Statement and Finding of Public
Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3
Subsection 1 . 3. Statutory Authority. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-4
Subsection 1 . 4 . Statement of Objectives. . . . . . . . . . . . 1-5
Subsection 1. 5. Boundaries of Housing and
Redevelopment Project No. 1 . . . . . . . . 1-8
Subsection 1. 6 . Parcels to be Acquired in Whole
or in Part Within Housing and
Redevelopment Project No. 1 . . . . . . .1-12
Subsection 1.7 . Estimated Public Improvement
Costs and Supportive Data. . . . . . . . . 1-13
Subsection 1.8 . Public Improvements and
Facilities Within Housing and
Redevelopment Project No. 1 . . . . . . . 1-17
Subsection 1 . 9 . Environmental Controls. . . . . . . . . . . .1-18
Subsection 1 . 10 . Proposed Reuse of Property. . . . . . . . 1-18
Subsection 1 . 11 . Administration and Maintenance
of Housing and Redevelopment
Project No. 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-19
Subsection 1.12. Rehabilitation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-19
Subsection 1.13. Relocation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-19
Subsection 1 .14 . Redevelopment Obligations . . . . . . . . . 1-20
EXHIBIT I-A Boundary Map of former Valley
Industrial Park Redevelopment
Project No. 1 As Established
on January 2, 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-A-1
EXHIBIT I-B Boundary Map of Modified
Valley Industrial Park
Redevelopment Project No. 1 ,
as Modified on July 17, 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . I-B-1
EXHIBIT I-C Boundary Map of redesignated
Modified Minnesota River Valley
Housing and Redevelopment
Project No. 1 as Modified
on February 28, 1984. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-C-1
( i )
SECTION II . REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TAX
INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 (K-MART) . . . . . . . . . . 2-1
( to be added at a later time)
"Grandfathered" tax increment district
SECTION III . TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX
INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 2
(ELDERLY HIGHRISE) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1
( to be added at a later time )
SECTION IV. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX
INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 3 (DOWNTOWN
COMMERCIAL REHAB)
Subsection 4 . 1 . Statement of Objectives ( ref ) . . . . . . 4-1
Subsection 4. 2. Modified Housing and Redevel-
opment Plan ( ref) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
e Subsection 4 .3 . Parcels to be Includedin Tax
Increment District No. 3. . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
Subsection 4 .4 . Parcels in Acquisition. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
Subsection 4. 5 . Development Activity in
Minnesota River Valley Housing
and Redevelopment Project No. 1
for which Contracts have been
Signed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-2
Subsection 4.6. Other Specific Development
Expected to Occur Within
Minnesota River Valley Housing
and Redevelopment
Project No. 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-2
Subsection 4 .7. Estimated Cost ofProject . . . . . . . . . . 4-2
Subsection 4.8. Estimated Amount of Bonded
Indebtedness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-2
Subsection 4 .9 . Sources of Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-2
Subsection 4.10 . Estimated Captured Assessed
Value • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-2
Subsection 4 .11 . Type of Tax Increment District . . . . . 4-2
Subsection 4 .12. Duration of Tax Increment
District No. 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3
Subsection 4 .13 . Estimated Impact on Other
Taxing Jurisdictions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3
Subsection 4.14. Modification of Tax Increment
District No. 3 and/or Tax
Increment Financing Plan. . . . . . . . . . .4-4
EXHIBIT IV-A Boundary Map of Tax Increment District
No. 3 as established June 29 , 1982. . . . . IV-A-1
EXHIBIT IV-B Cash Flow Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IV-B-1
( ii )
SECTION V. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX
INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 4 (RACETRACK) . . . . . . . . 5-1
( to be added at a later time )
SECTION VI . TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX
INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 5 (DOWNTOWN
COMMERCIAL REHAB CONTINUED)
Subsection 6.1 . Statement of Objectives ( ref ) . . . . . . 6-1
Subsection 6. 2 . Modified Housing and Redevel-
opment Plan ( ref) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
Subsection 6.3 . Parcels to be Includedin Tax
Increment District No. 5 . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
Subsection 6 .4 . Parcels in Acquisition. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
Subsection 6. 5 . Development Activity in Minnesota
River Valley Housing and Redevel-
opment Project No. 1 for which
Contracts have been Signed. . . . . . . . . 6-1
Subsection 6.6. Other Specific Development Expected
to Occur Within Minnesota River
Valley Housing and Redevelopment
Project No. 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-1
Subsection 6. 7 . Estimated Cost ofProject. . . . . . . . . . 6-2
Subsection 6.8. Estimated Amount of Bonded
Indebtedness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-2
Subsection 6 .9 . Sources of Revenue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-2
Subsection 6 .10 . Estimated Captured Assessed Value . . 6-2
Subsection 6.11. Type of Tax Increment District . . . . . 6-2
Subsection 6. 12. Duration of Tax Increment District
No. 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-2
Subsection 6 . 13. Estimated Impact on Other
Taxing Jurisdictions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-3
Subsection 6 . 14 . Modification of Tax Increment
District No. 5 and/or Tax
Increment Financing Plan. . . . . . . . . . . 6-3
EXHIBIT VI-A Boundary Map of Tax Increment
District No. 5 as established
August 7 , 1984 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .VI-A-1
SECTION VII . TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX
INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 (SHAKOPEE VALLEY
MOTEL)
Subsection 7 .1. Statement of Objectives ( ref) . . . . . . 7-1
Subsection 7 . 2 . Modified Housing and Redevel-
opment Plan (ref) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-1
Subsection 7 . 3 . Parcels to be Included in Tax
Increment District No. 6 . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1
Subsection 7 .4 . Parcels in Acquisition. . . . . . . . . . . . .7-1
( iii )
Subsection 7 . 5 . Development Activity in Minnesota
River Valley Housing and Redevel-
opment Project No. 1 for which
Contracts have been Signed. . . . . . . . .7-1
Subsection 7 . 6 . Other Specific Development Expected
to Occur Within Minnesota River
Valley Housing and Redevelopment
Project No. 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-1
Subsection 7 .7 . Estimated Cost of Project . . . . . . . . . . 7-1
Subsection 7 . 8. Estimated Amount of Bonded
Indebtedness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1
Subsection 7 .9 . Sources of Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-2
Subsection 7 . 10 . Estimated Captured Assessed Value. . 7-2
Subsection 7 . 11 . Type of Tax Increment District . . . . . 7-2
Subsection 7 . 12 . Duration of Tax Increment District
No. 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-2
Subsection 7 . 13 . Estimated Impact on Other
Taxing Jurisdictions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-3
' Subsection 7 . 14 . Modification of Tax Increment
District No. 6 and/or Tax
Increment Financing Plan. . . . . . . . . . .7-3
EXHIBIT VII-A Boundary Map of Tax Increment
District No. 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .VII-A-1
EXHIBIT VII-B Legal Description of Parcels
Constituting Tax Increment
District No. 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .VII-B-1
APPENDIX A ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE ADMINISTRA-
TION OF THE MODIFIED HOUSING AND REDEVEL-
OPMENT PLAN FOR HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NO. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A-1
Exhibit 1 Model Information Form to be Submitted
to the School Boards , Scott County
Board and the Minnesota Energy and
Economic Development Authority. . . . . . . . . . ( 1 )
APPENDIX B DATES OF PUBLIC ACTION AND RESOLUTION NOS .
f ESTABLISHING HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN,
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS, TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLANS AND MODIFICATIONS THEREOF
APPENDIX C EXCERPT FROM THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN
REVITALIZATION FINAL REPORT
( iv)
SECTION I .
MODIFIED HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
MINNESOTA RIVER VALLEY HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1
Subsection 1 . 1 . Definitions. The terms defined below
shall , for purposes of this Modified Housing and Redevelop-
ment Plan, have the meanings herein specified, unless the
context otherwise specifically requires :
"Authority" means this housing and redevelopment author-
ity created or authorized to be created by the Housing and
Redevelopment Act defined below.
"City" means the City of Shakopee, a municipal corpora-
tion and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota,
subject to the legal requirements of Chapter 412 of Minne-
sota Statutes relating to statutory cities.
"Commissioners" means the five commissioners consti-
tuting the Authority who are appointed by the Mayor , with
the approval of the City Council , as provided in §462. 425,
Subd. 6 of the Housing and Redevelopment Act.
"Comprehensive Plan" means the City ' s comprehensive plan
submitted to the Metropolitan Council pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, §473 .173 , which contains the objectives, policies,
standards and programs to guide public and private land use,
development, redevelopment and preservation for all lands
and water within the City through 1990 .
"Council" means the City .Council of the City, also re-
ferred to as the governing body as defined in Minnesota
Statutes , §462. 421, Subd. 5 .
"County" means the County of Scott, Minnesota.
"Housing and Redevelopment Act" means the statutes lo-
cated at Minnesota Statutes, §§462 . 411 through 462 . 716 , in-
clusive, as amended.
"Housing and Redevelopment Authority" means this housing
and redevelopment authority created or authorized to be
created by Minnesota Statutes, §§462 . 415 to 462.705 .
"Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1" means the
Minnesota River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No.
1, a "project" as said term is defined in Minnesota Stat-
utes, $462. 421, Subd. 13.
1 - 1
"Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan" means the plan
as modified from time to time by the Authority and the City
for Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 .
"Project" means the public improvements and facilities
to be constructed within Housing and Redevelopment Project
No. 1, as more fully described in Subsection 1. 8. of the
Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan.
"Project Area" means the real property located within
the geographic boundaries of Housing and Redevelopment Proj-
ect No. 1.
"Redevelopment Plan" means the original plan approved on
January 2, 1979 and modified from time to time by the
Authority and the City for Housing and Redevelopment Project
No. 1 as defined in §462 . 421 , Subd. 15, of the Housing and
Redevelopment Act .
"Special Assessment Bonds" means the special assessment
bonds issued by the City to finance certain public improve-
ments within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 pursu-
ant to the Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan. The
term "Special Assessment Bonds" shall also include any obli-
gations issued to refund the Special Assessment Bonds.
"State" means the State of Minnesota.
"Tax Increment Bonds" means the general obligation or
revenue tax increment bonds issued and to be issued by the
City to finance the public costs associated with Housing and
Redevelopment Project No. 1 as stated in the Modified
Housing and Redevelopment Plan and in the Tax Increment
Financing Plans for the Tax Increment Districts within
Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1. The term "Tax
Increment Bonds" shall also include any obligations issued
to refund the Tax Increment Bonds .
"Tax Increment District" means any tax increment dis-
trict presently established or to be established in the
future in Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 .
"Tax Increment Financing Act" means the statutory provi-
sions of Minnesota Statutes, §§273.71 through 273 .78, inclu
sive, as amended.
"Tax Increment Financing Plan" means the respective Tax
Increment Financing Plan for each Tax Increment District
located within the Project Area.
(SUBSECTION 1. 1 WAS ADOPTED AS A MODIFICATION TO THE
MODIFIED HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ON FEBRAURY 28,
1984 . )
1 - 2
Subsection 1. 2 . Statement and Finding of Public Pur-
pose. The Commissioners of the Authority in and for the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, have determined that there is a
need for housing, development and redevelopment within the
corporate limits of the City to provide employment opportu-
nities , to improve the tax base and to improve the general
economy of the State of Minnesota.
The Commissioners have determined that there is a need
for safe, decent , sanitary housing for all residents of the
City, particularly for the elderly and handicapped. There
is a need to provide an adequate housing supply for all
residents at a cost they can afford, particularly to provide
standard housing choices to persons and families of low and
moderate income. Therefore, the Commissioners have deter-
mined that certain parcels of property qualify as a "housing
project" pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462 . 421 ,
Subdivision 12 and as a "housing district" pursuant to Min-
nesota Statutes, Section 273 .73, Subdivision 11.
The Commissioners have found that there are certain
parcels of property within the City which are potentially
more useful, productive and valuable than is being realized
under existing conditions, and, therefore, are not contrib-
uting to the tax base of the City to their full potential.
The Commissioners have determined that certain parcels of
property, substantially occupied by buildings, streets,
utilities or other improvements, are deemed to be blighted
because fifty percent of the improvements are structurally
substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or
clearance or that twenty percent of the improvements are
structurally substandard and that another thirty percent of
these improvements require renovation or clearance due to
inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use
relationships, excessive diversity or obsolete buildings not
suitable for improvements or conversion. The Commissioners
have determined that certain parcels of property are deemed
to be blighted by virtue of conditions of unusual and diffi-
cult physical characteristics of the ground, which condi-
tions have prevented normal development of the land by pri-
vate enterprise, resulting in a stagnant and unproductive
condition of land potentially useful and valuable for con-
tributing to the public health, safety and welfare. There-
fore, the Commissioners have determined that certain parcels
of property qualify as a "redevelopment project" pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 462. 421, Subdivision 13 and as a
"redevelopment district" pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 273.73, Subdivision 10 .
The Commissioners have found that other parcels of prop-
erty do not qualify as housing or redevelopment districts as
1 - 3
defined above but do qualify as an "economic development
district" pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273 . 73 ,
Subd. 12 because the project or a portion of the project
will discourage commerce, industry or manufacturing from
moving operations to another state , will result in increased
employment or will result in preservation and enhancement of
the City ' s tax base.
The Commissioners have further determined that the es-
tablishment- of Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 will
provide the Authority and the City with the ability to
achieve certain public purpose goals not otherwise obtain-
able in the foreseeable future without the intervention of
the Authority and the City in the normal development pro-
cess. These goals include : the restora�ion and improvement
of the tax base and the tax revenue generating capacity of
the housing and redevelopment project, increased employment
opportunities, the availability of safe healthful housing
for all residents , the realization of comprehensive planning
' goals, the removal of blighted conditions, and the revitali-
zation of the property within the housing and redevelopment
project to create an attractive, comfortable, convenient and
efficient area for industrial, commercial and related uses.
(SUBSECTION 1 . 2 WAS ADOPTED AS A MODIFICATION TO THE
MODIFIED HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ON FEBRUARY 28,
1984 ) .
Subsection 1. 3 . Statutory Authority. THE HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT ACT. The Authority has determined that it is
desirable and in the public interest to designate a specific
area within the corporate limits of the City as Housing and
Redevelopment Project No. 1 and to establish, modify and
administer a housing and redevelopment plan (the "Modified
Housing and Redevelopment Plan" ) for Housing and Redevelop-
ment Project No. 1 .
Financing of the housing portions of Housing and Rede-
velopment Project No. 1 for the handicapped and the elderly
and for single family and multi-family housing , including
both low and moderate income housing, will be accomplished,
in part, through issuance of Chapter 462C and Section
462 . 445, Subdivisions 10, 11 and 12 bonds or other obliga-
tions.
. The financing of certain public improvements to be made
within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 shall be
accomplished, in part, through the use of funds which may be
available to the Authority from any source, including
grants, special assessment bonds or funds furnished to the
Authority by the City which may include the proceeds of
bonds issued by the City, pursuant to Section 462 . 581 ( 9 ) of
1 - 4
the Housing and Redevelopment Act, to pay all or any part of
the Authority of activities authorized by Section 462 . 445 ,
Subdivision 1, Clause 7 of the Housing and Redevelopment
Act.
THE MINNESOTA TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ACT. The Tax
Increment Financing Act provides the procedure for the
establishment of tax increment districts for the use of tax
increment financing authorized by the Housing and Redevelop-
ment Act described above for the funding of qualified public
activities and improvements .
The Tax Increment Financing Act authorizes the estab-
lishment within any tax increment district within Housing
and Redevelopment Project No. 1 of one or more of the fol-
lowing types of tax increment districts : ( i ) a redevelop-
ment district; ( ii ) a housing district ; and/or ( iii ) an eco-
nomic development district . The requirements for establish-
ing each of the above are set forth in Section 273.73, Sub-
divisions 10 , 11 and 12 , respectively, of the Tax Increment
Financing Act . The Tax Increment Financing Act also desig-
nates, for each of the above types of tax increment dis-
tricts, the limitations and requirements that apply to ac-
tivities and public improvements which can be financed for
each type of tax increment district .
The modification of each tax increment financing plan
shall be governed by the requirements of Section 273 .74 ,
Subd. 4 , of the Tax Increment Financing Act, and the City
Council, by this Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan,
hereby will establish the last subsection of each tax incre-
ment financing plan for each tax increment district as the
subsection in which any modifications to the tax increment
financing plan are stated. Appendix B of this Modified
Housing and Redevelopment Plan is hereby designated as the
place where dates of public action and resolution numbers of
each resolution passed by the Council modifying in any
manner the Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan or any
tax increment financing plan shall be located and shall
become a part of this Modified Housing and Redevelopment
Plan.
Subsection 1 . 4. Statement of Objectives. The Authority
and the City seek to achieve the following specific objec-
tives as to appropriate land uses and to serve as an outline
of general standards of housing, development and redevelop-
ment:
(AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED FOR K-MART ON JANUARY 2, 1979 ) .
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City of
Shakopee through this Modified Housing and Redevelopment
Plan, seek to achieve the following objectives:
1 - 5
a. To provide logical and organized land use
for the area consistent with the City comprehensive
plan and zoning ordinance.
b. To eliminate blighting influences which
to date have impeded potential development in the
area.
C. To provide safe and adequate drainage in
this area.
d. To provide adequate utilities and other
public improvements and facilities to enhance the
area for both new and existing development .
e. To stimulate commercial and industrial
development in the Project area and in the City.
f. To provide increased employment and to
supplement the financial and property tax base of
the City.
g. To provide maximum opportunity, consis-
tent with the sound needs of the City as a whole,
for redevelopment by private enterprise.
(EXPANDED ON JUNE 29 , 1982 TO INCLUDE
ADDITIONAL DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL REHAB OBJECTIVES)
h. To encourage planning for development of
a desirable and unique character within the down-
town business district through quality and coordi-
nated land use alternatives and design in new and
remodeled buildings and sites, in a manner consis-
tent with the comprehensive plan of the City and
with a minimum adverse impact on the environment .
i . To establish a comprehensive commercial
rehabilitation loan program to prevent further
economic and physical deterioration of small and
medium size commercial buildings within the City.
j . To acquire certain parcels within the
downtown business district which are not now in
productive use or in their highest and best use, to
make soil corrections and to construct public im-
provements on said parcels, thereby promoting and
facilitating the development and redevelopment of
other property in the City.
1 - 6
a. To provide logical and organized land use
for the area consistent with the City comprehensive
plan and zoning ordinance.
b. To eliminate blighting influences which
to date have impeded potential development in the
area.
C. To provide safe and adequate drainage in
this area.
d. To provide adequate utilities and other
public improvements and facilities to enhance the
area for both new and existing development.
e . To stimulate commercial and industrial
development in the Project area and in the City.
f. To provide increased employment and to
supplement the financial and property tax base of
the City.
g. To provide maximum opportunity, consis-
tent with the sound needs of the City as a whole,
for redevelopment by private enterprise .
(EXPANDED ON JUNE 29 , 1982 TO INCLUDE
ADDITIONAL DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL REHAB OBJECTIVES)
h. To encourage planning for development of
a desirable and unique character within the down-
town business district through quality and coordi-
nated land use alternatives and design in new and
remodeled buildings and sites, in a manner consis-
tent with the comprehensive plan of the City and
with a minimum adverse impact on the environment .
i . To establish a comprehensive commercial
rehabilitation loan program to prevent further
economic and physical deterioration of small and
medium size commercial buildings within the City.
j . To acquire certain parcels within the
downtown business district which are not now in
productive use or in their highest and best use, to
make soil corrections and to construct public im-
provements on said parcels, thereby promoting and
facilitating the development and redevelopment of
other property in the City.
1 - 6
q. To provide additional new housing units
so as to accomodate the needs of expanding commer-
cial and industrial employment base including high-
quality housing choices to persons and families of
low and moderate income.
r . To provide sound residential neighbor-
hoods that are ascetically developed, well located
and adequately serviced with municipal utilities
and amenities.
S . To provide the impetus for residential
development by private enterprise consistent with
the goals of the Authority and the City including
the policies, present and future housing needs, and
housing allocation plans and implementation pro-
grams of the Housing Element of the Metropolitan
Development Guide of the Metropolitan Council of
the Twin Cities Area.
Subsection 1. 5 . Boundaries of Housing and Redevelopment
Project No. 1.
Boundaries of Redevelopment Plan for the Valley
Indus-rial Park Redevelopment Project No. 1 as
established on January 2, 1979
( SEE EXHIBIT I-A FOR BOUNDARY MAP. ) The property
which comprised the original Valley Industrial Park
Redevelopment Project No. 1 is legally described as
follows:
Lot 1, Block 1, Valley Park, 3rd Addi-
-r-ion, City of Shakopee, Minnesota; and
Bound=-ries of Redevelopment Project No. 1 were
modif;ed on July 17 , 1979 to include the follow-
in_q: (SEE EXHIBIT I-B FOR BOUNDARY MAP. )
The Right of way of County Road 83 South-
erly of Trunk Highway 101 and northerly
of County Raod 16 ; Lot 1, Block 1, Valley
Third Addition; and Lot 13, Block One,
Valley Park Fifth Addition; and the West
1/2 of Section 9 , Township 115, Range 22 ,
except that part of the West 1/2 of Sec-
tion 9 , Township 115, Range 22, Southerly
of the centerline of County Road 16; all
lying within the City of Shakopee, Scott
County, Minnesota.
1 - 8
Increased Geographic Area of Housing and Redevelop-
ment Project No. 1 as Modified on February 28 ,
1984 . (SEE EXHIBIT I-C FOR BOUNDARY MAP. )
(The boundaries of Redevelopment Project No. 1 as
modified on July 17 , 1979 are included in the ex-
panded project area)
Section 31, 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 and 36 , Town-
ship 116 , Range 22 south of the Minnesota
River , Scott County, Minnesota.
That part of Section 1 , 2, 3, 4 , 5, 10
and 11, Township 115 , Range 22 , Scott
County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the
southerly right of way of the Trunk High-
way 101 Bypass as recorded in Document
Number 179496 in the office of the Scott
County Recorder .
That part of Section 12, Township 115,
Range 22 , Scott County, Minnesota lying
northerly of the following described
line:
Beginning at the Southwest Corner of the
Northwest Corner of said Section 12,
thence northerly to the southerly right
of way of the Trunk Highway 101 Bypass as
recorded in Document Number 179496 in the
office of the Scott County Recorder , to
the true point of beginning, thence east-
erly along said southerly right of way to
the intersection with the southerly right
of way of Trunk Highway 101 , thence east-
erly along said Trunk Highway 101 right
of way to the East line of said Section
12 and there terminating .
That part of the East Half of Section 9 ,
Township 115 , Range 22 , Scott County,
Minnesota, lying northerly of the south-
erly right of way of the Trunk Highway
101 Bypass as recorded in Document Number
179496 in the office of the Scott County
Recorder .
That part of the West Half of Section 9 ,
Township 115, Range 22, Scott County,
Minnesota, lying northerly of the south-
erly right of way of County Road No. 16.
1 - 9
That part of the West Half of Section 9 ,
Township 115 , Range 22, Scott County,
Minnesota, lying northerly of the south-
erly right of way of the Trunk Highway
101 Bypass as recorded in Document Number
179496 in the office of the Scott County
Recorder .
The South Half of the North Half of Sec-
tion 7 , Township 115 , Range 22 , Scott
County, Minnesota.
That part of the South Half of Section 7 ,
Township 115, Range 22, Scott County,
Minnesota, lying northerly of the south-
erly right of way of the Trunk Highway
101 Bypass as recorded in Document Number
179496 in the office of the Scott County
Recorder .
That part of Section 8, Township 115,
Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, lying
northerly of the southerly right of way
of the Trunk Highway 101 Bypass as re-
corded in Document Number 179496 in the
office of the Scott County Recorder ex-
cepting therefrom:
The Northwest Quarter of the North-
west Quarter of Section 8 lying
southerly of the southerly right of
way of County Road No. 16 .
Section 6 , Township 115, Range 22 , Scott
County, Minnesota, and Section 1 and
Section 2 , Township 115 , Range 23 , Scott
County, Minnesota, excepting therefrom:
Hesse ' s First Addition to Shakopee,
Scott County, Minnesota; Hesse' s
Second Addition to Shakopee, Scott
County, Minnesota; Scenic Heights
4th Add' n, Scott County, Minnesota;
and that part of Section 6 , Township
115, Range 22 , Scott County, Minne-
sota, and that part of Section 1 and
Section 2, Township 115, Range 23,
Scott County, Minnesota, lying
southerly and westerly of the fol-
lowing described line:
1 - 10
Beginning at the Southeast Corner of
Section 6, Township 115, Range 22,
Scott County, Minnesota, thence
westerly along the south line of
said Section 6 to the westerly right
of way of County Road No. 17 to the
true point of beginning, thence
northerly along said County Road No.
17 right of way to the northeast
corner of Lot 2, Block 2, Furrie ' s
2nd Addition, Scott County, Minne-
sota, thence westerly along the
southerly right of way of Third Ave-
nue to the northwest corner of Lot
1 , Block 2 of said Furrie ' s 2nd
Addition, which point bears North 10
Degrees 24 Minutes 14 Seconds West
from the Southwest corner of said
Lot 1, a distance of 148 . 69 feet,
thence westerly to the northeast
corner of Lot 6, Block 28, East
Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota,
thence westerly along the south
right of way of Third Street to the
northwest corner of Lot 10, Block 4,
of said East Shakopee, thence west-
erly to the northeast corner of Lot
6 , Block 166 , Shakopee City, Scott
County, Minnesota thence westerly
along the southerly right of way of
Third Street to the northwest corner
of Lot 10, Block 49, of said
Shakopee City, thence southerly
along the easterly right of way of
Holmes Street to the northwest cor-
ner of Lot 10 , Block 56 of said
Shakopee City, thence westerly along
the southerly right of way of Fourth
Street to the northwest corner of
Court House Square thence southerly
along the easterly right of way of
Fuller Street to the northwest cor-
ner of Lot 10 , Block 73 of said
Shakopee City, thence westerly along
the southerly right of way of Fifth
Street to the northeast corner of
Lot 6, Block 71, Shakopee City,
thence northerly along the westerly
right of way of Atwood Street to the
northeast corner of Lot 6 , Block 46
of said Shakopee City, thence west-
erly along the southerly right of
1 - 11
way of Third Street to the northwest
corner of Lot 10, Block 174 of said
Shakopee City, thence westerly to
the northeast corner of Lot 2 , Block
One Wiggin ' s First Addition, Scott
County, Minnesota, thence westerly
along the southerly right of way of
Third Avenue to the northwest corner
of Lot 1, of said Block One, which
point is the northeast corner of Lot
11, Block 4 , Koeper ' s Addition,
Scott County, Minnesota, thence
westerly along the southerly right
of way of Third Street to the north-
west corner of Lot 12 , Block 9 , of
said Koeper ' s Addition, thence west-
erly to the northeast corner of Out
Lot "A" , Husman Addition, Scott
County, Minnesota, thence westerly
along the southerly right of way of
3rd Street to the northwest corner
of Out Lot "D" thence southwesterly
along the southeast right of way of
the C. St . P. M. & 0. Railroad to
the west line of Government Lot 7 ,
Section 2 , Township 115, Range 23 ,
Scott County, Minnesota and there
terminating.
Subsection 1 .6 . Parcels to be Acquired in Whole or in
Part Within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 . The
following parcels of property will be acquired by the
Authority to be included within Housing and Redevelopment
Project No. 1:
(AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED ON JANUARY 2 , 1979 )
It is anticipated that it will be necessary to
acquire the property in the Redevelopment Project Area
immediately upon approval of these plans , and to enter
into contracts to provide moneys for this purpose using
the land as security for the repayment of such moneys.
All new development on land acquired by the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority in the Redevelopment Project
shall be industrial and/or commercial. It is estimated
that the cost of acquiring the property described below,
through negotiation or condemnation, will be approxi-
mately $1,100 , 000 .
Lot 1, Block 1, Valley Park, 3rd Addition,
City of Shakopee, Minnesota; and
1 - 12
(AS MODIFIED ON FEBRUARY 28, 1984 )
The Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of
Section 5, Township 115 , Range 22, Scott County,
Minnesota excepting therefrom:
The West 150 . 00 feet of the north 333 . 00 feet
of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter of Section 5, Township 115 , Range 22 .
The South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section
5, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota.
The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of
Section 4, Township 115 , Range 22 , Scott County,
Minnesota.
That part of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter
of Section 8, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County,
Minnesota, lying northerly of the centerline of
County Road No. 16.
The Northwest Quarter of Section 9 , Township 115 ,
Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota excepting there-
from:
The south 400 feet of the west 100 feet of the
South Half of the Northwest Quarter .
The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of
Section 9, Township 115, 'Range 22, Scott
County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the
centerline of County Road No. 16.
(AS MODIFIED MAY 20, 1986)
In addition, the Authority intends to acquire such addi-
tional parcels of land within Housing and Redevelopment
Project No. 1, as the same may be amended from time to time,
as the Authority may determine to be necessary or desirable
to assist or implement the Modified Housing and Redevelop-
ment Plan.
Subsection 1. 7 . Estimated Public Im rovement Costs and
Supportive Data.
(AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED FOR K-MART ON JANUARY 2, 1979)
The estimated costs of the public improvements to be
made within the original Valley Industrial Park Redevelop-
ment Project No. 1 and financed by tax increments derived
from the tax increment district within Valley Industrial
Park Redevelopment Project No. 1 are as follows:
1 - 13
Estimated costs of Housing and
Redevelopment Authority $ 3,650 , 000*
* Includes capitalized interest
Estimated costs of Redevelopment
Project to be financed by the
private developer 15 , 000 , 00
Estimated annual debt service 630, 000
Estimated annual tax increment 700 ,000
Estimated Tax Increment Revenue Bond Issue
It is estimated that the City will have to issue
tax increment revenue bonds to finance the public rede-
velopment cost of the Project of $1 , 120 ,000 and the
costs to be incurred by the City in aid of the Redevel-
opment Project of $1 , 205 , 000 . It is estimated that the
bond issue will be in the amount of $3 ,650 , 000 in order
to provide moneys needed to pay interest on the bonds
until tax increments to be derived from the Redevelop-
ment Project are available to pay debt service.
(THE FOLLOWING ESTIMATED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE
ELDERLY HIGH RISE WERE ADDED ON OCTOBER 2, 1979 )
The cost of the redevelopment project to be paid by the
HRA, and of public improvements to be constructed by the HRA
in aid of the project, and the anticipated proceeds to be
received by the City from the disposition of the property
within the redevelopment project, are estimated as follows:
LAND ACQUISITION $100 , 000
WATER MAIN EXTENSION 100 , 000
PEDESTRIAN OVERPASS 110 , 000
CAPITALIZED INTEREST 50 , 000
RELOCATION COSTS 5, 000
PAVING COSTS 11000
ADMINISTRATIVE & PLANNING COSTS 7 ,000
FISCAL AND LEGAL COSTS 10 , 000
DISCOUNT FOR BONDS 6 , 000
1 - 14
TOTAL $389 , 000
LESS ANTICIPATED SALE PROCEEDS 20 , 000
NET TOTAL $369 , 000
(THE FOLLOWING ESTIMATED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO
THE DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL REHAB PROGRAM WERE ADDED ON JUNE 29 ,
1982)
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 70 , 000
MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITY. . . . . . . . . $50 , 000
GREEN SPACE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $20 ,000
COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM. . . . . . . . . . . . $ 50 , 000
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $58, 300
INTEREST ON BONDS PRIOR TO RECEIPT OF TAX
INCREMENT - ASSUMES 11 . 50 INTEREST RATE. . . . . . . . . . . $ 46,287
BOND DISCOUNT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4 , 500
NET BOND ISSUE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $230 , 000
The supportive data for the estimated public improvement
costs are as follows:
ITEM BASIS FOR ESTIMATE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Estimates by City Staff
COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION
LOAN PROGRAM Estimates by City Staff
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Estimates of Project
costs for administra-
tive, consulting ser-
vices, planning, legal
assistance and bond
issuance costs.
INTEREST ON BONDS PRIOR
TO RECEIPT OF TAX Assumes 11. 50% interest
INCREMENT TO FULLY rate
FUND PRINCIPAL AND
INTEREST
(THE FOLLOWING ESTIMATED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO
THE RACETRACK WERE ADDED ON FEBRUARY 28, 1984 )
1 - 15
It is estimated that additional on-site and off-site
public improvements, including administrative costs, capi-
talized interest and bond issuance costs to be paid through
the Authority will not exceed eleven million dollars.
Specific costs relating directly to each type of public
improvement is given in the cost subsection of the tax in-
crement financing plan for each tax increment district .
(THE FOLLOWING ESTIMATED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO
CONTINUATION OF THE DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL REHAB PROGRAM WERE
ADDED ON AUGUST 7 , 1984)
The listing of public costs for proposed public
improvements associated with the long range Downtown
Redevelopment Plan is attached as Appendix C.
Public costs for development in the foreseeable future
are as follows:
Street-scape Improvements
Road, sidewalk including curbs,
pavement, landscaping, tree grates
and guards, plaza, bus shelters,
Kiosks, lighting and parking
facilities $750,000
Rehabilitation loans
Interest rate reduction on
commercial rehabilitation loans
up to a maximum of $200 , 000
to bring existing commercial
structures in compliance with
Building Code. $250 , 000
Bond issuance is not anticipated for the immediate
future.
(AS MODIFIED MAY 20 , 1986 )
Additional public improvement costs to be incurred
r within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 and to be
financed by tax increments derived from all tax increment
districts within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 are
estimated to be:
Land Acquisition/Site Improvements $ 330 ,000
Street Improvements 64 , 000
Bond Issuance, Discount and
Legal Expenses 20 , 000
Contingency 10 ,000
Capitalized Interest 76 , 000
Total Project Costs $500, 000
Total Bonded Indebtedness $500 , 000
_ - lE
3
Subsection 1.8. Public Improvements and Facilities
Within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 .
(AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED ON JANUARY 2, 1979 )
The cost of the Redevelopment Project to be paid by the
City, and of public improvements to be constructed by the
City in aid of the Project , and the anticipated proceeds to
be received by the City from the disposition of the property
within the Redevelopment Project, are estimated to be as
follows :
a . Land Acquisition;
b. Site Preparation;
C. Site Improvements ;
d. Utilities - water , sewer , etc. ;
e . Water Storage Tank ;
f . Municipal Well;
g . Administrative and Planning; and
h. Fiscal and Legal;
(AS MODIFIED ON JUNE 29 , 1982)
Publicly financed improvements and facilities
may include:
a. Acquisition of property;
b. Site preparation, including demolition and
clearance;
C. Installation of public utilities and improve-
ments;
d. Parking facilities and green spaces;
e . Commercial rehabilitation; and
f . Administration including planning and economic
development consulting, bond counsel and fis-
cal consultants .
It is further contemplated by the City that additional
public activities may occur in the future, including the
potential establishment of a reserve fund system for in-
dustrial development revenue bonds. --k{
(AS MODIFIED ON FEBRUARY 28, 1984 )
Included in the type of on-site and off-site public
improvements estimated as to cost in subsection 1 .7 above
may be the following:
a. land acquisition;
b. earthwork and grading;
C. site lighting and fencing;
1 - 17
d. open space amenities ;
e. sidewalks;
f . curb and gutter ;
g . watermains ;
h. sanitary and storm sewers ;
i . roads and parking ;
j . other eligible site preparation work ; and
k . land sale and Environmental Impact Statement.
The above is not intended to convey the order in which the
above improvements are to be completed or to convey which
improvements will ultimately be financed by the Authority or
the developer .
(AS MODIFIED AUGUST 7, 1984 )
Included in the types of public improvements being
considered for the Continued Downtown commercial rehabilita-
tion program are:
a. Interest rate reduction;
b. Paving-curb, sidewalk, roads;
C. Bus shelters;
d. Lighting;
e. Parking; and
f. Landscaping.
Subsection 1 . 9 . Environmental Controls . The proposed
development in Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 does
not present significant environmental concerns . All munici-
pal actions, public improvements and private development
shall be carried out in a manner consistent with existing
environmental standards .
Subsection 1 . 10 . Proposed Reuse of Property. The pub-
lic improvements needed to bring about development and rede-
velopment activity as set forth in Subsection 1 . 8 above may
include acquisition of land, site improvements , rail and
street improvements and utility system improvements . The
estimated public improvement costs to be financed by tax
increment financing are summarized in each of the tax incre-
ment financing plans.
The Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan does not
contemplate the acquisition of private property until such
time as a private developer presents an economically feasi-
ble program for the reuse of that property. Proposals for
the reuse of private property must be within the framework
of the above cited goals and objectives of the Authority and
the City. Acquisition and sale of certain private property
by the Authority shall be subject to a binding contract with
the purchaser incorporating appropriate restrictions regard-
ing the reuse and redevelopment of the property. Before
1 - 18
approving any such contract or sale, the Authority shall be
satisfied that adequate funds will be available to repay the
public costs associated with the proposed acquisition.
Subsection 1 . 11 . Administration and Maintenance of
Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 . Maintenance and
operation of the public improvements in Housing and Redevel-
opment Project No. 1 will be the responsibility of the
Director of the Authority in and for the City ( the "Admin-
istrator" ) . The Administrator will administer Housing and
Redevelopment Project No. 1 pursuant to the provisions of
the Housing and Redevelopment Act; provided, however , that
such powers may only be exercised at the direction of the
Authority. These administrative responsibilities are
spelled out in Appendix A immediately following this Mod-
ified Housing and Redevelopment Plan. No action taken by
the Administrator pursuant to the above-mentioned powers
shall be effective without authorization by the Authority.
Subsection 1 . 12 . Rehabilitation. Owners of properties
within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 will be en-
couraged to rehabilitate their properties to conform with
the applicable state and local codes and ordinances, as well
as any design standards. Owners of properties who purchase
property within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 from
the Authority may be required to rehabilitate their proper-
ties as a condition of the sale of the land. The Authority
will provide such rehabilitation assistance as may be avail-
able from federal , state or local sources .
Subsection 1 . 13. Relocation. The Authority accepts its
responsibility for providing assistance for relocation ac-
tivities pursuant to Section 462 . 531 of the Housing and
Redevelopment Act and Sections 117.50 to 117 . 56 of the
Minnesota Relocation Act .
Subsection 1 . 14 . Redevelopment Obligations .
(AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED ON JANUARY 2 , 1979 ) .
The general requirements to be imposed upon the redevel-
oper are :
a. To redevelop the land within the Project in
accordance with this Redevelopment Plan and the Redevel-
opment Agreement .
b. To submit all construction plans to the Hous-
ing and Redevelopment Authority for review and approval.
C. To commence and complete the construction of
improvements within such reasonable period of time as
determined by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
1 - 19
d. To provide guarantees for the performance of
its obligations under the Redevelopment Agreement .
e . Not to discriminate on the basis of race ,
color , creed, sex or national origin in the construction
of the facility or in the employment of personnel .
f . To devote the land only to the uses permitted
by this Redevelopment Plan for a period of twenty ( 20 )
years from the date of the conveyance by the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority.
g . To pay promptly when due all real estate taxes
and special assessments.
h. To take no action which would cause the prop-
erty within the Project to become exempt from real es-
tate taxation for so long as tax increment revenue bonds
are outstanding .
i . To comply with all applicable provisions of
the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act, Minnesota
Statutes, Section 462 . 411, et seq.
(AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 1984 , Subsection 1.14 (f)
was deleted and the following language
substituted therefor )
( f) The Authority reserves the right to devote any
or all land described in the Housing and Redevelopment
Plan to the uses permitted by this Plan and by statute
for the period of years appropriate to the parcel ( s) and
as authorized by statute.
1 - 20
I—12mcm=-V
i
K MART TAX INCRSMIE1v i DISTRIC
.r • ?. ��- �• � ( ORIGINAL)
� 1. / � � r.'•711TC'Lr1:11T.7WK7:7[1{70.a1FD IT` 1 ;�
le
Ali ' I l_
r. r--4!,.-°>R -4 nvn� _ _-.._._ .. . _ .nc>..�Twocaeontmr�.c. .�..1��,-,:ruz�►aacz►re::�•�cr�
�11♦#A1 >!i'/TTTlT7!T71C#7 � •7C7�Li7ewRL�7 ."�:fe1:T 1Y a
e
1 �
I
1 •/
I , .
I � e 1 �•. i ev .. ,•
1 e i
• I 1
e
�i a '1•� j1.�.,1�I
11
:k 1
1
CITY or SHAl( or' C_ r_
I-AX INCREMENT PnO,IEC-f AI-IEA •' ;
r►'1 1 a Ii 1� 1.. . I
! i I til
- Ar. 111
� 1
I
Irl I i
r
1 SII � _______..___..__. _._ _ , '\ ,r ',I� •I. .' � r 1 .. I `
1 1
SECTION II .
REDEVELOPMENT FOR
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
( K-MART) *
(To be added at a later time) .
* Grandfathered district . Tax Increment Financing Plan
not required prior to August 1 , 1979 .
2 — 1
SECTION III .
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 2
(ELDERLY HIGHRISE)
(To be added at a later time) .
3 - 1
SECTION IV.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 3
(DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL REHAB)
Subsection 4 .1 . Statement of Objectives. See Section
I , Subsection 1 . 4 of the Modified Housing and Redevelopment
Plan.
Subsection 4 . 2. Modified Housing and Redevelopment
Plan. See Section I , Subsection 1 . 2 through 1 . 14 of the
Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan.
Subsection 4 . 3 . Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment
District No. 3 . The following parcels are located in the
City of Shakopee, County of Scott, State of Minnesota:
Legal Description Owner
Lot 6, Block 21 Gary Laurent
Randolph Laurent
Lots 1 , 2 and 3 and the First National Bank
West half of the South of Shakopee
102. 00 feet of Lot 4 ,
Block 23
The northerly 51 . 00 feet Karen Moonen
of Lots 1 and 2, Block 30 David Moonen
Lots 1, 2 and 3 and the Art Berens & Sons,
South 102 . 00 feet of Lot Inc.
4, Block 22 , Original
Shakopee Plat
Subsection 4 . 4 . Parcels in Acquisition. It is intended
that the Authority may publicly acquire the following prop-
erty:
Legal Description Owner
The northerly 51. 00 feet Karen Moonen
of Lots 1 and 2, Block 30 David Moonen
Properties identified for acquisition may be acquired by
the Authority in order to accomplish the following:
a. Demolition and clearance; and
b. Installation of public utilities.
4 _ 1
Subsection 4 . 5. Development Activity in Minnesota River
Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 For Which
Contracts Have Been Signed. The following contracts have
been entered into by the City of Shakopee and the persons
named below:
[Contracts entered into by the City of Shakopee
will be inserted in this Subsection as they are
consummated. ]
Subsection 4 . 6 . Other Specific Development Expected to
Occur Within Minnesota River Valley Housing and Redevelop-
ment Project No. 1 . [As specific development is expected to
occur , it will be inserted in this Subsection. ]
Subsection 4 . 7 . Estimate Cost of Project. See Subsec-
tions 1.7 and 1 .8 of the Modified Housing and Redevelopment
Plan for estimated costs associated with Housing and Rede-
velopment Project No. 1 .
Subsection 4 . 8. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebted-
ness . Pursuant to Section 273.74 , Subd. 1, of the Tax In-
crement Act , the estimated amount of bonded indebtedness
required to amortize the costs identified in Subsections 1.7
and 1.8 is approximately $230,000 . Bond sales will be based
on availability of tax increment.
Subsection 4. 9 . Sources of Revenue. Public improvement
costs , acquisition and site preparation costs and other
costs outlined in Subsections 1.7 and 1 .8 will be financed
through the issuance of general obligation tax increment
bonds to be repaid by the annual collection of tax incre-
ments.
Subsection 4 . 10 . Estimated Captured Assessed Value .
Pursuant to Section 273 . 74 , Subd. 1 , and Section 273 .76 ,
Subd. 2 , of the Tax Increment Act , the estimated captured
assessed value in Tax Increment District No. 3 as of Janu-
ary 2 , 1983 , will each year approximate $293,750 . This
estimated annual captured assessed value is determined in
the following manner :
Estimated Assessed Value of 1983 payable 1984 $674,805
Original Assessed Value 1981 payable 1982 $381,055
Estimated Captured Assessed Value $293 ,750
Subsection 4 .11 . Type of Tax Increment District. Tax
Increment District No. 3 is, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 273 . 73 , Subd. 10 (1) , a redevelopment district as
defined below:
4 - 2
"70 percent of the parcels in the district are
occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other
improvements and more than 50 percent of the build-
ings, not including outbuildings , are structurally
substandard to a degree requiring substantial reno-
vation or clearance; "
Subsection 4 . 12 . Duration of Tax Increment District No.
3. Pursuant to Section 273. 75 , Subd. 1 , of the Tax Incre-
ment Act , the duration of Tax Increment District No. 3 will
be eighteen (18) years from the date of receipt by the
Authority of the first tax increment or twenty ( 20 ) years
from the creation of Tax Increment District No. 3 . The date
of receipt by the Authority of the first tax increment will
be July, 1984 . Thus, it is estimated that Tax Increment
District No. 3, including any modifications for subsequent
phases or other changes, would terminate in December 2001.
Subsection 4 . 13. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing
Jurisdictions. The relative impact of forgoing the poten-
tial taxes generated by private investment in Tax Increment
District No. 3 over the next twenty ( 20) years can be evalu-
ated by calculating the increase in mill rates needed to
generate an equivalent amount of taxes as those potentially
generated by new development in Tax Increment District No.
3. The relative impact of Tax Increment District No. 3 on
the taxing jurisdictions in which Tax Increment District No.
3 is located is shown in the following table:
Impact on Tax Jurisdictions if Development
Occurred Without Public Assistance
Tax Increment District No. 3
Mills if
Taxing 1981-82 CAV* Dollar Mill Rate
Jurisdiction Mills Available Impact Impact
City of Shakopee 19 .145 19 . 081 - . 064
County of Scott 39 . 046 39 . 002 - . 044
School District
No.720 52.380 52. 214 - . 166
Other 5. 594
Other Taxing jurisdictions include: HRA, Metropolitan Coun-
cil, Metropolitan Mosquito Control, Metropolitan Transit
Commission, Lower Minnesota Watershed District.
* Captured Assessed Value
4 - 3
-7
Subsection 4. 14 . Modification of Tax Increment District
No. 3 and/or Tax Increment Financing Plan. As of June 29 ,
1982 , no modifications to Tax Increment District No. lA
within Downtown Redevelopment Project No. 1 or the Tax
Increment Financing Plan therefor have been made.
(As Modified on August 7 , 1984)
1 . Tax Increment No. lA (as originally identified at
the time of adoption on June 29 , 1982 ) is hereby modified to
meet the legal requirements of Laws 1982, Chapter 523, an
amendment to the Tax Increment Financing Act.
2 . Tax Increment No. lA is hereby further modified to
reflect an enlargement of Minnesota River Valley Housing and
Redevelopment Project No. 1 and increased project costs of
as outlined in Section I , Subsections 1.12 and 1 . 5, respec-
tively, of the Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan.
3. Tax Increment No. lA is hereby redesignated as Tax
Increment District No. 3 within Minnesota River Valley
Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 .
(As Modified May 20, 1986 )
The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Dis-
trict No. 3 was modified to reflect revised project costs to
be incurred within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1
as a result of the amendment of the Modified Housing and
Redevelopment Plan.
4 - 4
01)
1 R/ VER . IA
PARK Q NEC
Y
GI
• C1HALI
tu
DOWNTOWN REUEVELONt,
BOUNDARY PROJECT No
Fi_ �n U -= TAX INCITEMENT FINANCI
Li I 1 ,V4 Offlc i DISTRICT 1002 - 1
I .,
— '.
IR i
L I
TATKw . 10
VALLEY FAIR
r I
I yM�(s • . — • • `� >- AMUSEMENT PAITK
LJ - fl _ _ y
6 tiro CI �� Tlail . E� 1=
'
SCHOOL
L PROJECT LOCATION i' IIWY 101
r ~- -- _
!'l_l'�l �,�� VALLEY rrwY 1:1
I
�-- �E. :•r" r �a � - - - - ; --• INDUSTfiIAL PAF1K
AWN
LI H IJ 51hH SI-Int<OPLk
• CEN1flAL' MAIIVS VICINITY MAP
DOWNTOWN
13.11. 6/ 21 /02 14m4 00'
REDEVELOPMENT PROJ . 1
.w [.N AWN _ -._ _ 11A1. _ ___ •..n.!
T 1 )e 1�� rr�r► ,r- ►1 r 1'llr •r '4►.acMua a, r 'IJww.ia• .0
EXHIBIT IV-B '
`.SECT VAmE : SMKF'E1
JcCT START LATE : 01/1Y82
EC1 END LATE : 1:/2001
I . F . DiSTk1CT uu . lA CONS &STI14G OF THt tIXST NATIONAL
Nn OF SHAi,.Or*EE/THE LAURENT PROPER I Y/THE MUUNLM F'kuP-
TY /THE DEr:E;iS F'kU�'ERTY . THE BORL, ) ERM 1S 1°- 1 /2
;,K$ AT 11 . 5 PERCENT WITH 18 YEARS OF FECEIVIHG
.r.F;EnE;1T5
X INC ADJUSTMENT : 100 . 0000
8=/06/'23
LISTING OF 11A1 A. !NPUT FuR BASE VALUES
INj TIAL STAk F Ekli --- INLREPIEr'1 -
.� . A M E VALUE U,; 1 E LATE 1 7 FLP: :'SLUE
- , ) VER{NS PROPERTY 74;E9 01/8: 11-1/00
: . ) 1S7 NA71ONAL b:,Nt. 260�lY9 O1/d1 1./00
: . ) MOONEN PROPERTY 121 °=' O1/a1 12'/UO
. ) LAUREH 1 FKOPERTY .4js7:i O1/81 12/00
E=/06/23
LISTING OF DA I A ! NPUT FOR ASSESSED VALUES
INIf *r i A_ CTAP: LP ' --- IhILRE�it:4 --
_n , N A M E VALUE I:r:T- 11AI E TY F ER VA-U:
t'R0E-Elk TY 0 U:/82 12/E2
O1/E3 1'_'/01
_ . ) IST NA.71ONAL BANK 0 01/L:
SE3-11 U./E- --x/01
1bu475• C-/, --/C_
E2 06/:-
-- =T :NC �F ISA i A ? NPH FOR CAF '7A: CXF E;!_=..
INS TIAL S rAk-F -i-:11 --
n A t- E VALUE ll; I E DATE TY F'_ti VALUE
• ) hL't�ICT
PARK-'rkru FACILITY 0 0-/$2 0//82
1''500 02/t2 11/22
0 1:'/E2 1'_/01
07/E2
10000 08/.2 09/E2
0 1V/22 1210:
C3nM_=:C = AL KEHA? LOAN F'KUGRAn 0 01/82 07/82
10000 0E/c2 12/E2
_1 ING uF DA fA INF•UT FuF; BOuD I:SUES -. - --
---ktF'�YMEH'--•
ISSUE FACE PkNCF-L MNTHS S i AkT T PA'/!.i
NAME OF POND /EXP . VALUE /1NTST MN1 M:: /El.y Y /I l; .
:OJECT 06/8= 2.:0000 . . . . . . . A . . . . 06/8.' 0
. . . . . a1 . 1`
8:/06/23
ING OF IiA I A INPUT FUR PONU PZ::GL:t:LS
IN1 'rIAL STAR l EPD --- _ Nc;REMEkI —
N A n E VALUE 11A l'E GA I'E TY PEN VALUE
�u-'ECT 0 01/E2 05/8:
:30000 06/e2 06/8_
0 07/82 12/0?
83/06/23
i 1 NC OF I}r TA INPUT FOR OTHER EXPENt�ES
I N='r1AL S T ARI EXIT --- I HL•PE.mF N-j
N A n E VALUE VAI E 11A rE I'Y PER VALLI=
�Ntl DlaI:0UN7 . 0 01/82 OS/E2
4500 06/2: 06/c2
0 07/82 12J01
_AAir;?i�lC CClNSUL TING SERVICES 0 01/x:2 06/2''
10000 07/82 0Y/2:
•:._ :. sSGAe SE►;V- _=� C. 01"c_' c./ E=
1:'000 06/E2 OE/L-
0 0'/S2 C.
100 0c/IS-1 ,
E:'/06/'_I
Ina L'FNF'UT FUR CITY MILL F.P.'^ 1-E2
INi 1 IAL S I r-R I ENI --
N A P E
eJF L Lt: liAl't lies CE rY 'r'=:; VALUE
e 06/:*
=i :eir Ct' lleilr Ii4F'L'T FUR INFLATICIN K�? :S
1f r1ASTAF.
IiE
htL
LISIING OF Ili; (A INF•UT FuF: B0,41) ISSUES
ISSUE FACE F'R;4�F'L MNTHS S I A�T�1'MPAItMi•
NAME OF ?OND /EXP . VALUE /1HTST MNIHS /EMM Y /IN . F
PROJECT 06/e= :600!10 . . . . . . . A . . . .
12/Ul
e0/UQ/23
LI = i ING OF UA I A IHPUT FUF: BOND Pf:OUEEIUS
INITIAL START _ EHL --- INL:REMENI -
�t A r E VALUE IlA I'E TSA YE TY F'EK JAL�_
� �E -
> PRLJECT
0 of/e= 0s/e2
2*2000t' 06/x;2 06/e2
0
0I/62 12/O1
LIS i :HG OF DATA INPUT FOR OTHER EXPENe iES
?N''TIAL STAR? E?•'J TNC �Ea
N A n E VALUE liAl E i A 1�_� 1�Y fl
_, 1_N ! ---
1 VALUE
-,ND I�:SL'OUh� 0 01/e2 0F/22
4500 06/2= 0b/°2
0 07/e_
F'LAh�tINC= I:D�SUL r-NL SEtiVlCES p
o1/en U6lc.
= 0000 07/E2 09/EZ,
�; Cc—/EZ
:2000 06/E2 CE/L_
TON
0 C ./E2 0./2I
100
c_1U6
-ISI :NG OF 11AI A :?lRU' FuR CITY MILL RAI-E_
N r, IN1 t -"'A L
A
E VALUE UATC LA I'E f Y F't1 VALUE
= 16 . 16,x, 0?/L;
I =N= GF FUR liNFLATION KAI E2
� ter
8_/O6/:.13
SSI ING OF IIA I A INPUT FOR INVt STMENT KATES
INITIAL STAR1 EHD --- INCREMENT
N . A M E VALUE LlA l E 11A UE 'rY F:R VALUE
11 . TUU
NAME OF ITEr TO DE L1STEL O1/E;2 1.'/O1
COMMAND _
i . ALL
START MONTH : EHL MONTH , INCREMENT
NUAL
FROJELT NAME : SHKPE1
L_S I RICT NU . IA CUN:IS 11Nu !JF fHE FIX: ;T NATIUNAL
BANK OF SHAKOF'EE/THE LAIIREH I F'F:UF'ERl Y/1 HE MUUNLN FF.OF-
ERTY/TH_ kEREMS PNOrERTY . THE BOND TEkt'. IS 19- 1/2
YEARS Ai 11 . � PERCENT U11 H 18 YEAKS OI` RLL:E I VIN'G
T O T A L I N C O M E
F=:Cu 01_/19£: TO 12/_r.C•. N ANNUAL 'HTEF.VALS
F.SScSSED :AS= MILL TAX LARD OTHLF: BOND INVEST"--
VAL_'S L-ALUt .:A I•E 1VICNEMEN7 SALES INC,Ur.=
3E105S 1 0 0 0 =30000 75C^
jE1V5 • 116 . 16 0 0 0 0 S_:
671805 3t 1 G`E i 1 b . 16: 30111 0 0 0 3t_7
J C'
G � As116 . 165 r -: 0 r
67�8C,
6748CL' - C�L 1 _E • 1bJ s� -_. ^ 0 G v - -
7A605 E10E: 116 . 16= 3r1_� C, . 0 0
o ---
-�
467-18C'E =- - C=
6 /4t0Lb :•S • 16`, .5A1_'J 0
674605 3S10SE 6C p 0 0 • ``=_
p 0
674805 3ei055 116 . 165 3A122
- 0 0 G 1£=i
_
i 674806. .E 10'Z5 116 . 165 :6.11.3 p
0 p •J1�C.`,
674805 321 05= 115 . 165 341_'j 0
67480 !2 i 0;: 116 . 16;;, 611213 0 0
0 0 -
J b7r805 3£10`5 116 . 165 341_'3 0 0 0 _< c 21
_
`74805 :SP1UL,5 11b . 1t5 3=I.3 p p _ 0
PROJECT NAME : SHf;F'E1 "`
7 . I . � . I�iSTk:CT �lt� . it, i:ONSI_TINt OF THE FlftiST NATIOi AL
BANK OF SSA.KOPE=/TH= LAUREN T PROPERTY/THD MOUNEN F'RO='-
ERTY/T HE PER EH—S F•RO1:rn I Y THE BII`aU TEF:!- 1o- ^�
T O T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S
FROM 01/ 1982 TO 12/:001 IN ANNUAL INIERVALS
CAPITAL. OTHER --0 L D D E P T-- 1*0 AL
;M YEAR EXPENSES EXPENSES PRINLIh'AL Ix1EF.LS'l EXPENSES
198= 120000 -17200 0 0 1671--l00
198 0 1200 0 0 1200
1964 0 1200 0 0 1700
198: 0 1200 0 0 1200
1986 0 1200 0 0 1200
1967 0 12100 0 0 11)00
1988 0 1200 0 0 1200
1989 0 1200 0 0 1200
1990 0 11_'00 0 0 1200
1991 0 i200 0 0 1200
1992 0 1200 0 0 1200
1993 0 1:200 0 0 :200
199A 0 1200 ^ 0 1200
199 0 1200 0 0 1200
1996 0 0 0 0 0
1997 0 0 0 0 0
1998 0 0 0 0 0
1999 0 0 0 0 0
2OOU 0 0 0 0 0
. 0C1 0 0 0 0 0
. i . U. .TF:..T N0 _ A :.0N S 1N GF TH_ F1r::T NFT:G-
BAtgN Ci LAJF ENT : F'1) E' TY/1 MuuU !'z w -
r BUHL' T-"F:!.
Y�nF: 7 _ F•C:CEN T L':i H 1 c Y_A, tJ- F- F:E:._T v I NC-
E32/Oai:3
T 0 T A L R E S E k V E
FROh Vi/ 1,782 TO 13/2001 IN ANNUAL IH-► ERVALS
TOTAL TOTAL --N E W I+ E F 1 -- TOTAL TOTAL LtAS�
'.n ?NCO ME EXF•ENSES F*RIMCIPAL INTEREST SUF:F'LU:, RESE=:VE F: S=r:;.'=
237500 167200 0 6613 63688 6'688
=3 S : J9 1300 0 261 0 1=177 4U�it
3538 1200 7630 26-5041Jlpill
c
-C 580A5 1200 8OJB ':,5/J 3313 44659 'Y44E
c 3EA72 1200 8::21 2.6647 4103 .18762
7 39001 1300 y711 :'16667 .5139 t3e92 37296
yE 39670 1_00 9529 2^630 6309 60303 43375
=9 40474 1300 10077 ::1534 7663 6/tbE J0754
JO 41448 1200 10651 20375 921` 77081 59bL'8
- 1 1260E 1200 11269 19150 i09$8 88070 70-209
43985 1200 : 191% 17854 13013 l01-o?; 83:44
1 �SOE 1200 1 603 16463 153' I ib=:5 0 y-
.67`lm 1200 1331'7 150 = 17950 1 .7 6 , =
�5 497.6 '_300 14054 13501 30?40 134.7
114:.-1c
5237 0 1A904 li $RO 3.``90 18OEEi � crr-
=7 r
=5 `915% 0 16667 lUl�c 39:x= 210-°3 18115E
=5 c?� � BJJ� :41_� 244617 213??'
•. J4C G 17636 64.7 393%6 ''Q1629 4679
0i 81x,6 0 16639 4- 10 45096 9 6=% -
_ /3651 0 19710 =_bb - 67Q :66066° 3 "i:i
r!i0 F = LA:1Fr"ENT F'F;yF: TY/1 :;L t,L;L)tq PF nc
k' - ?H, - - YEAF.s OP F:._'_- V- �
8:/06/ 3
S U M M A R Y
�X INCREMErT AL: . 100 . 0000
BOND ISSUE PROCEEDS. 230000
LANP :TALE INCOME 0
OTHER INCOME 0
TAX INCREMENT 610810
INVESTMENT INCOME ''79608 TOTAL INCOME
11169S.0p
=APITAL EXPENSES !20000
7TMER ExF-EmSES 62800
=AFITALIZE11 INTEREST 4h_'E7
`LP DEBT 0 TOTAL EXPLr:1iiTUKES L:
5'GE7
ALANL'E OF LtUT SERVICE :+071 y-1 eALANCE
TER NAME OF F:EROFT WANTED 537362
SECTION V.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 4
(RACETRACK)
(To be added at a later time ) .
5 � 1
J
SECTION VI .
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 5
(DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL REHAB CONTINUED)
Subsection 6.1 . Statement of Objectives . See Section
I , Subsection 1 . 4 of the Modified Housing and Redevelopment
Plan.
Subsection 6 . 2 . Modified Housing and Redevelopment
Plan. See Section I , Subsection 1 . 2 through 1 . 14 of the
Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan.
Subsection 6 . 3 . Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment
District No. 5 . The following parcels are located in the
City of Shakopee, County of Scott, State of Minnesota:
The East 6 feet of the South 90 feet and the West
34 .5 feet of the East 40. 5 feet of the South 42
feet of Lot 4 and the South 90 feet of Lot 5, Block
63, City of Shakopee plat.
Subsection 6.4 . Parcels in Acquisition. It is not
anticipated that the Authority will acquire property at this
time. As property is publicly acquired it shall be listed
below.
Properties identified for acquisition may be acquired by
the Authority in order to accomplish the following:
a. Demolition and clearance; and
b. Installation of public utilities.
Subsection 6 . 5 . Development Activity in Minnesota River
Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 For Which
Contracts Have Been Signed. The following contracts have
been entered into by the City of Shakopee and the persons
named below:
[Contracts entered into by the City of Shakopee
will be inserted in this Subsection as they are
consummated. ]
Subsection 6.6 . Other Specific Development Expected to
Occur Within Minnesota River Valley Housing and Redevelop-
ment Project No. 1. [As specific development is expected to
occur , it will be inserted in this Subsection. ]
6 - 1
Subsection 6 . 7. Estimate Cost of Project . See Subsec-
tions 1.7 and 1.8 of the Modified Housing and Redevelopment
Plan for estimated costs associated with Housing and Rede-
velopment Project No. 1 .
Subsection 6 .8. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebted-
ness. Pursuant to Section 273 .74, Subd. 1 the Tax Increment
Financing Act requires that the estimated amount of bonded
indebtedness required to amortize the costs be identified.
At this time a bond sale is not contemplated.
Subsection 6 . 9. Sources of Revenue. Public improvement
costs, acquisition and site preparation costs and other
costs outlined in Subsections 1 .7 and 1 . 8 will be financed
through the annual collection of tax increments, various
grants including Minnesota Department of Transportation
Small Cities Development Grant, Economic Development Grant
} and Park Grants, and the use of special assessments .
Subsection 6 . 10 . Estimated Captured Assessed Value .
Pursuant to Section 273 . 74 , Subd. 1, and Section 273 . 76,
Subd. 2, of the Tax Increment Act, the estimated captured
assessed value in Tax Increment District No. 5 as of Janu-
ary 2, 1984 , will each year approximate $14 ,835 . This esti-
mated annual captured assessed value is determined in the
following manner :
Estimated Assessed Value of 1983 payable 1984 $33,024
Original Assessed Value 1981 payable 1982 $18,189
Estimated Captured Assessed Value $14 ,835
Subsection 6 . 11 . Type of Tax Increment District . Tax
Increment District No. 5 is , pursuant to Minnesota Statutes ,
Section 273 . 73, Subd. 10 ( 1 ) , a redevelopment district as
defined below:
"70 percent of the parcels in the district are
occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other
improvements and more than 50 percent of the build-
ings, not including outbuildings, are structurally
substandard to a degree requiring substantial reno-
vation or clearance; "
Subsection 6. 12. Duration of Tax Increment District No.
5. Pursuant to Section 273 . 75 , Subd. 1, of the Tax Incre-
ment Act, the duration of Tax Increment District No. 5 will
be twenty-three ( 23) years from the date of receipt by the
Authority of the first tax increment or twenty-five (25)
years from the creation of Tax Increment District No. 5.
The date of receipt by the Authority of the first tax incre-
ment will be July, 1986 . Thus, it is estimated that Tax
6 - 2
Increment District No. 5 , including any modifications for
subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate in
December 2009 .
Subsection 6 . 13 . Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jur-
isdictions . The relative impact of forgoing the potential
taxes generated by private investment in Tax Increment Dis-
trict No. 5 over the next twenty-five ( 25 ) years can be
evaluated by calculating the increase in mill rates needed
to generate an equivalent amount of taxes as those poten-
tially generated by new development in Tax Increment Dis-
trict No. 5 . The relative impact of Tax Increment District
No. 5 on the taxing jurisdictions in which Tax Increment
District No. 5 is located is shown in the following table:
Impact on Tax Jurisdictions if Development
Occurred Without Public Assistance
Tax Increment District No. 5
Mills if
Taxing 1983-84 CAV* Dollar Mill Rate
Jurisdiction Mills Available Impact Impact
City of Shakopee 17. 453 17 . 450 - .003
County of Scott 33. 004 33 . 002 - . 002
School District
No. 720 55. 630 55.622 - . 008
Other 4 .493
Other Taxing jurisdictions include: HRA, Metropolitan Coun-
cil, Metropolitan Mosquito Control, Metropolitan Transit
Commission, Lower Minnesota Watershed District .
* Captured Assessed Value
Subsection 6 .14 . Modification of Tax Increment District
No 5 and/or Tax Increment Financing Plan. As of August 7 ,
1984 , no modifications to Tax Increment District No. 5 or ,
the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor have been made .
As of May 20 , 1986, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for
Tax Increment District No. 5 was modified to reflect revised
project costs to be incurred within Housing and Redevel-
opment Project No. 1 as a result of the amendment of the
Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan.
6 - 3
JC1U J
1 0
I ,
I i
lU I � aV
r
W
N Block 3 Shbkopde City r .'
to U
W 3 I I I
9
I
`0 I J U)
I
I
I I I
i
I
First Avenue
I�Ilnnaaote Rlvar Valley
eausing and Redevelopment Project Nu. 1. S.N. x+/26/84
fax Increment District No. tea
SECTION VII .
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 6
( SHAKOPEE VALLEY MOTEL)
Subsection 7 .1 . Statement of Objectives. See Section
I , Subsection 1 . 4 of the Modified Housing and Redevelopment
Plan.
Subsection 7 . 2 . Modified Housing and Redevelopment
Plan. See Section I , Subsection 1. 2 through 1. 14 of the
Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan.
Subsection 7 . 3 . Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment
District No. 6 . A map showing the boundaries of Tax Incre-
ment District No. 6 is attached to this Financing Plan as
Exhibit VII-A, and the parcels constituting said District
are legally described in the attached Exhibit VII-B.
Subsection 7 . 4 . Parcels in Acquisition. The Authority
intends to acquire parcels within Tax Increment District No.
6 at the time or times as the Authority may determine to be
necessary or desirable to assist or implement development
within Tax Increment District No. 6.
Subsection 7 . 5. Development Activity in Minnesota River
Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 For Which
Contracts Have Been Signed. The Authority intends to enter
into suitable development and assessment agreements with de-
velopers for the development of Housing and Redevelopment
Project No. 1, including Tax Increment District No. 6, pur-
suant to the Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan.
Subsection 7 .6 . Other Specific Development Expected to
Occur Within Minnesota River Valley Housing and Redevelop-
ment Project No. 1 . Based on preliminary discussions with
developers, the Authority, as of the date of adoption of
this Financing Plan, reasonably expects that expansion of a
motel facility and construction of a restaurant facility
` adjacent thereto and a campground and recreational facility
will occur within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 .
Subsection 7 .7 . Estimated Cost of Project. See Subsec-
tions 1.7 and 1.8 of the Modified Housing and Redevelopment
Plan for estimated costs associated with Housing and Rede-
velopment Project No. 1.
Subsection 7 .8. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebted-
ness. Pursuant to Section 273 .74, Subd. 1, of the Tax In-
crement Financing Act, general obligation or revenue tax
7 - 1
increment bonds may be used as required to amortize the
costs identified in Section I, Subsections 1.7 and 1.8 of
the Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan. Bond sales
will be based on availability of tax increment . Bonds will
not be issued at one time but as needed.
Subsection 7 . 9 . Sources of Revenue. Public improvement
costs, acquisition and site preparation costs and other
costs outlined in Subsections 1.7 and 1.8 will be financed
through the annual collection of tax increments, various
grants including Minnesota Department of Transportation
Small Cities Development Grant, Economic Development Grant
and Park Grants, and the use of special assessments.
Subsection 7 . 10 . Estimated Captured Assessed Value.
Pursuant to Section 273 . 74 , Subd. 1, and Section 273. 76 ,
Subd. 2 , of the Tax Increment Act, the estimated captured
assessed value in Tax Increment District No. 6 when all
development contemplated is completed will approximate
$524, 393. This estimated annual captured assessed value is
determined in the following manner :
Estimated Assessed Value at completion $897,999
Original Assessed Value 1985 payable 1986 $373,606
Estimated Captured Assessed Value $524, 393
Subsection 7.11 . Type of Tax Increment District. Tax
Increment District No. 6 is, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 273.73, Subd. 10 (a) ( 3) , a redevelopment district as
defined below:
"Less than 70 percent of the parcels in the
district are occupied by buildings , streets,
utilities or other improvements, but due to
unusual terrain or soil deficiencies requiring
substantial filling, grading or other physical
preparation for use at least 80 percent of the
total acreage of such land has a fair market
value upon inclusion in the redevelopment
district which, when added to the estimated
cost of preparing that land for development,
excluding costs directly related to roads as
defined in section 160. 01 and local improve-
ments as described in section 429 . 021, sub-
division 1, clauses 1 to 7, 11 and 12, and
section 430 . 01, if any, exceeds its antici-
pated fair market value after completion of
said preparation; provided that no parcel
shall be included within a redevelopment dis-
trict pursuant to this paragraph (3) unless
7 - 2
the authority has concluded an agreement or
agreements for the development of at least 50
percent of the acreage having the unusual soil
or terrain deficiencies, which agreement
provides recourse for the authority should the
development not be completed; "
and as a redevelopment district is subject to the limita-
tions of Sections 9 . 8 and 9 . 12 hereof.
Subsection 7 . 12 . Duration of Tax Increment District No.
6 . Pursuant to Section 273 . 75, Subd. 1, of the Tax Incre-
ment Act, the duration of Tax Increment District No. 6 will
be twenty-five ( 25 ) years from the date of receipt by the
Authority of the first tax increment. Since the date of re-
ceipt by the Authority of the first tax increment is antici-
pated to occur in 1988, it is estimated that Tax Increment
District No. 6, including any modifications for subsequent
phases or other changes, would terminate in December 2013 .
Subsection 7 .13 . Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jur-
isdictions. The impact of Tax Increment Financing District
No. 6 on the affected taxing jurisdictions is reflected in
the Authority' s anticipated need to utilize the tax incre-
ments generated thereby during the period described in Sub-
section 7 . 12 above for the purposes of financing public re-
development costs identified in the Modified Housing and
Redevelopment Plan, following which period the increased
assessed valuations will innure to the benefit of such tax-
ing jurisdictions.
Subsection 7.14 . Modification of Tax Increment District
No. 6 and/or Tax Increment Financing Plan. As of May 20 ,
1986 , no modifications to Tax Increment District No. 6 or
the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor were made, said
date being the date of original adoption thereof .
e
7 - 3
IWARKEr
4 7 *1 1 1
F -A
d ` 1 '11 � 1 11'1 1 1 111 11 •�
�IJ � , 1 V� ' 1 1 11 11 11 •�
1
N AI 11 11 11 1..
05
1' el� 11 1'1
11 li 1 1 1 R /
L , C
k t �
11 ,
G 1 1 11 y l 1 1
G 1
m
� � 1
X
_ cmc col
ao
cu
D rv<z
n �—
C)mD t of
� I
on GO MA ST,
z
oG
.. I
MARS HALL ROA
"oma W
NOME ��ID
S NEE TRAIL ��
EXHIBIT VII-B
Legal Description
(Tax Increment District No. 6)
Lot 1 , Block 1 , Halo Second Addition, according to the recorded
plat thereof , Scott County, Minnesota .
That Burmahi , Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, fee owner and
Wallace D. Bakken and Joanne E. Bakken, husband and wife ,
contract purchasers, and Security State Bank of Savage, a
Minnesota corporation, mortgagee of the following described
property situated in the County of Scott, State of Minnesota ,
to-wit ;
That part of Lots 2 and 3 , Block 1 , Halo Second Addition,
according to the recorded plat thereof, Scott County, Minnesota
described as follows :
Beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot 2 ; thence north-
easterly along the northerly line of said Lot 2 and 3 a distance
of 198 . 00 feet ; thence southeasterly parallel with the easterly
line of said Lot 2 to the southerly line of said Lot 3 ; thence
southwesterly along said southerly line a distance of 150. 00
feet; thence deflecting at an angle of 48 degrees 54 minutes
to the right to the westerly line of said Lot 2 ; thence northerly
along said westerly line to the point of beginning.
That Burmahi, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, fee owner and
Wallace D. Bakken and Joanne E. Bakken, husband and wife,
contract purchasers , and First Western State Bank of St.
Louis Park, a Minnesota corporation, mortgagee of the followinc
described property situated in the County of Scott, State
of Minnesota, to-wit;
That part of Lot 3 , Block 1 , Halo Second Addition, according
mo the recorded plat thereof , Scott County, Minnesota, lying
easterly of the following described line :
o?n . encing at the southeast corner of said Lot 3 ; thence
southwesterly along the southerlN7 line of said Lot 3 a distant_
c- 150 . 00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be
described ; thence northwesterly at right angles a distance
of 150 . 00 feet to the northerly line of said Lot 3 and there
terminating .
That Richard Roeglin, an individual, fee owner and proprietor
cf the following described property situated in the County
of Scott, State of Minnesota, to-wit;
That part of Lot 2, Block 1 , Halo Second Addition, according
zo the recorded plat thereof , Scott County, Minnesota, lying
VII-B-1
- i
t
southeasterly of the following described line :
Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 2 ; thence
southwesterly along the southerly line of said Lot 2 a distance
of 126 . 00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be
described ; thence deflecting at an angle of 48 degrees 54
minutes to the right to the westerly line of said Lot 2 and
there terminating.
That Shakopee Countryside Recreation Center Associates, a
Minnesota General Partnership, fee owner and proprietor of
the following described property situated in the County of
Scott , State of Minnesota , to-wit;
Lot 4 , Block 1 , Halo Second Addition, according to the recorded
plat thereof , Scott County, Minnesota.
Together with that part of Government Lots 4 and 5 , Section
6 , Township 115 , Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, described
as follows :
Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 4 , Block 1 , Halo
Second Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof ,
Scott County, Minnesota; thence southeasterly along the
easterly line of said Lot 4 to a point 310 . 00 feet north-
westerly of the north right of way line of First Street and
parallel with Naumkaeq Street ; thence North 79 degrees 17
minutes 51 seconds East parallel with said First Street to
a line 73. 00 feet westerly of and parallel with the east
line of said Government Lot 5 ; thence North 0 degrees 10
minutes 51 seconds East parallel with said east line a
distance of 63 . 30 feet ; thence North 71 degrees 57 minutes
5' seconc= East to the east line of said Government Lot 5 •
thence North 0 degrees 10 minutes 51 seconds East along said
east line to the waters edge of the Minnesota River ; thence
westerly along said waters edge to the intersectic-- with
a line described as follows :
Commencing at a point on the east line of previously mentioned
Naumkaeg Street 889. 00 feet northerly of the southwest corner
of Block 31 , East Shakopee, Minnesota, according to the
recorded plat thereof ; thence North 79 degrees 17 minutes
51 seconds East, parallel with the previously mentioned First
Street 601 . 20 feet to the point of beginning of the line
to be described; thence North 11 degrees 03 minutes 07 seconds
West, parallel with said Naumkaeg Street to the waters edge
of said Minnesota River and there terminating.
Thence South 11 degrees 03 minutes 07 seconds East along
the last described line to the point of beginning of said
VII-B-2
line ; thence South 51 degrees 41 minutes 07 seconds East
to the intersection with a line 100 . 00 feet westerly of and
parallel with the east line of said Government Lot 4 ; thence
South 0 degrees 04 minutes 06 seconds West along said parallel
line to the northwest corner of Halo First Addition, according
to the recorded plat thereof ; thence South 66 degrees 20
minutes 48 seconds East along the northeasterly line of said
Halo First Addition to the intersection with a line described
as follows :
Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 4 , Block 1 ,
Halo Second Addition ; thence South 79 degrees 17 minutes
51 seconds West along the northerly line of said Lot 4 a
distance of 366 . 35 feet ; thence North 9 degrees 36 minutes
05 seconds West a distance of 245 . 75 feet ; thence South 81
degrees 45 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 365. 00 feet
E to the point of beginning of the line to be described ; thence
South 6 degrees 35 minutes 19 seconds West to the northeasterly
line of said Halo First Addition and there terminating.
Thence North 6 degrees 35 minutes 19 seconds East along the
last described line to the point of beginning of said line ;
thence North 81 degrees 45 minutes 03 seconds East a distance
of 365 . 00 feet; thence South 9 degrees 36 minutes 05 seconds
East to the northerly line of said Lot 4 , Block 1 , Halo Second
Addition; thence easterly along said northerly line to the
point of beginning.
Together with that part of Outlot A, Halo First Addition,
according to the recorded plat thereof , Scott County,
Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line:
Ccn-mencing at the east corner of said Outlot A; thence westerly_
alone_ the southerly line of said Ou-lot A a distance of 66 . 00
fee`_ to the point of beginning of the line to be described ;
thence northwesterly to a point on the northeasterly- line
of said Outlot A lying 12000 feet (as measured along the
northeasterly line of said Outiot A) northwesterly of the
ease corner of said Outlot A.
That Wallace D. Bakken and Joanne E. Bakken, husband and
wife, fee owners and proprietors of the following described
property situated in the County of Scott, State of Minnesota,
to-wit ;
Commencing at the northeast corner of Lot 4 , Block 1, Halo
Second Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof ,
Scott County, Minnesota; thence southwesterly along the
northerly line of said Lot 4 a distance of 366 . 35 feet to
the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence
VII-B-3
North 9 degrees 36 minutes 05 seconds West a distance of
245 . 75 feet; thence South 81 degrees 45 minutes 03 seconds
West a distance of 365. 00 feet ; thence South 6 degrees 35
minutes 19 seconds West to the northeasterly line of Outlot
A, Halo First Addition accordinq to the recorded plat thereof ,
Scott County, Minnesota ; thence southeasterly along said
northeasterly line to the east corner of said Outlot A; thence
northeasterly along the northerly line of said Lot 4 to the
point of beginning .
Except that part of said Government Lot 5, described as
follows :
Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 4 , Block 1 ,
Halo Second Addition; thence southwesterly along the
northerly line of said Lot 4 a distance of 366 . 35 feet to
the point of beginning of the land to be described ; thence
North 10 degrees 39 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of
189 . 87 feet ; thence South 79 degrees 17 minutes 35 seconds
West a distance of 117 .28 feet; thence South 10 degrees 33
minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 177 . 60 feet ; thence
South 18 degrees 56 minutes 02 seconds West to the northerly
line of said Lot 4 ; thence northeasterly along said northerly
line to the point of beginning.
VII-B-4
APPENDIX A
ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE
FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE MODIFIED HOUSING
AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NO. 1
The Authority has, pursuant to Section I , Subsection
1 .11 of the Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan, desig-
nated the Director of the Authority in and for the City to
serve as Administrator of the Modified Housing and Redevel-
opment Plan for Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 as
authorized by §462.445 , Subd. 1 ( 2 ) of the Housing and Rede-
velopment Act to supervise the maintenance and operation of
public improvements and activities financed by the Tax In-
crement Districts within Housing and Redevelopment Project
No. 1 .
ADMINISTRATIVE POWERS
The Administrator will administer the Modified Housing
and Redevelopment Plan pursuant to the provisions of Sec-
tions 462. 411 through 462.716, inclusive, as amended, of the
Housing and Redevelopment Act. Subject to the authorization
and approval of the Board of Commissioners, the Administra-
tor shall administer , pursuant to §462. 445, subd. 1, ( 1)
through ( 9) , the following powers of the Authority:
(1) To sue and be sued; to have a seal, which
shall be judicially noticed, and to alter the same at
pleasure; to have perpetual succession; and to make , and
from time to time amend and repeal, rules and regula-
tions not inconsistent with these sections ;
( 2 ) To employ an executive director , technical
experts, and such officers, agents and employees , perma-
nent and temporary, as it may require, and determine
their qualifications , duties , and compensation; for such
legal services as it may require , to call upon the chief
law officer of the municipality or to employ its own
counsel and legal staff ; so far as practicable, to use
the services of local public bodies, in its area of
operation, such local public bodies, if requested, to
make such services available;
( 3) To delegate to one or more of its agents or
employees such powers or duties as it may deem proper ;
( 4) Within its area of operation to undertake,
prepare, carry out, and operate projects and to provide
A - 1
for the construction, reconstruction, improvement , ex-
tension, alteration, or repair of any project or part
thereof;
( 5) Subject to the provisions of section 462 . 511 ,
to give, sell , transfer , convey or otherwise dispose of
real or personal property or any interest therein and to
execute such leases, deeds, conveyances , negotiable
instruments, purchase agreements, and other contracts or
instruments, and take such action, as may be necessary
or convenient to carry out the purposes of these sec-
tions;
(6 ) Within its area of operation to acquire real
or personal property or any interest therein by gifts ,
grant, purchase, exchange, lease, transfer , bequest,
devise, or otherwise, and by the exercise of the power
of eminent domain in the manner or otherwise, and by the
exercise of the power of eminent domain, in the manner
provided by Minnesota Statutes 1945 , Chapter 117, and
any amendments thereof or supplements thereto, to ac-
quire real property which it may deem necessary for its
purposes under these sections, after the adoption by it
of a resolution declaring that the acquisition of the
real property is necessary to eliminate one or more of
the conditions found to exist in the resolution adopted
pursuant to section 462. 425 or found to exist by section
462.425, subdivision 5, or is necessary to carry out a
redevelopment project as defined in section 462 . 321 ,
subdivision 13;
(7) Within its area of operation, and without the
adoption of an urban renewal plan, to acquire, by all
means as set forth in clause (6) of this subdivision,
including by the exercise of the power of eminent do-
main, in the manner provided by chapter 117 , and without
the adoption of a resolution provided for in subdivision
1, clause ( 6 ) , real property, and to demolish, remove ,
rehabilitate or reconstruct the buildings and improve-
ments or construct new buildings and improvements
thereon, or to so provide through other means, as set
forth in Laws 1974 , Chapter 228, or to grade, fill and
construct foundations or otherwise prepare the site for
improvements, and to dispose of said property pursuant
to section 462 . 525, provided that the provisions of
section 462. 525 requiring conformance to an urban re-
newal plan shall not apply, and to finance such activ-
ities by means of the redevelopment project fund or by
means of tax increments or tax increment bonds or by the
methods of financing provided for in section 462. 525 or
by means of contributions from the municipality provided
for in section 462 . 581, clause (9) , or by any combina-
A - 2
3
tion of such means; provided that, real property with
buildings or improvements thereon shall only be acquired
when the buildings or improvements are substandard; and
provided further that the exercise of the power of emi-
nent domain under this clause shall be limited to real
property which contains buildings and improvements which
are vacated and substandard. For the purpose of this
subparagraph, substandard buildings or improvements mean
buildings or improvements that are dilapidated or ob-
solescent, faultily designed, lack adequate ventilation,
light, or sanitary facilities, or any combination of
these or other factors that are detrimental to the
safety or health of the community;
( 8) Within its area of operation to determine the
level of income constituting low or moderate family
income. Such income level shall be that level below
which there is not available within the area of opera-
tion a substantial supply of decent , safe and sanitary
housing provided by private enterprise without subsidy
at prices or rents within the financial means of persons
and families of such incomes. The authority may estab-
lish various income levels for various family sizes . In
making its determination the authority may consider
income levels which may be established by the federal
housing administration or a similar or successor federal
agency for the purpose of federal loan guarantees or
subsidies for persons of low or moderate income . The
authority may use such determination as a basis for the
maximum amount of income for admissions to housing de-
velopment projects owned or operated by it;
( 9) To provide in federally assisted projects such
relocation payments and assistance as may be necessary
to comply with the requirements of the Federal Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition
Policies Act of 1970 , and any amendments or supplements
thereto.
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS
1. All actions taken by the Administrator pursuant to
the above-mentioned powers shall be carried out within the
statutory requirements for a Housing and Redevelopment
Authority as given in Minnesota Statutes, Sections 462 . 411
through 462.716 .
2 . An amount not exceeding ten percent (10% ) of the
total tax increment expenditures authorized by the tax in-
crement financing plan(s) or the total tax increment expen-
ditures for the project, whichever is less, can be used to
pay any administrative expenses for a project.
Minnesota Statutes, §273 .75 , Subd. 3.
A - 3
3. Administrative expenses include amounts paid for
services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, and
planning or economic development consultants. Administra-
tive expenses do not include amounts paid for the purchase
of land or amounts paid to contractors or others providing
materials and services, including architectural and engi-
neering services, directly connected with the physical de-
velopment of the real property in the project, relocation
benefits paid to or services provided for persons residing
or businesses located in the project, or amounts used to pay
interest on, fund a reserve for , or sell at a discount bonds
issued pursuant to section 273 .77.
Minnesota Statutes, §273 .73, Subd. 13.
4 . Following Council approval of a tax increment
financing plan for a tax increment district, the Administra-
tor shall request the County Auditor to certify the original
assessed value of the tax increment district.
Minnesota Statutes 8273 . 74, Subd. 3 .
5. Upon adoption by the Council of the tax increment
financing plan for a tax increment district, the Administra-
tor shall file a copy of the tax increment financing plan
with the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Author-
ity.
Minnesota Statutes, §273 .74, Subd. 2.
The plans should be addressed as follows:
Minnesota Energy and Economic
Development Authority
Community Development Division
9th Floor , American Center Building
150 East Kellogg Blvd.
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Attention: John Jacobson
6 . The Administrator shall seek modification of a tax
increment financing plan for a tax increment district by the
process required for approval of the original tax increment
financing plan if the Authority seeks to do any of the fol-
lowing:
(a) reduce or enlarge the geographic area of the
tax increment district ( the geographic area can be re-
duced but not enlarged after five ( 5) years following
certification to the original assessed value of the tax
increment district) ;
(b) increase the amount of bonded indebtedness to
be incurred;
A - 4
(c) increase the portion of captured assessed
value to be retained by the City;
(d) increase the total estimated tax increment
expenditures; or
(e) designate additional property to be acquired
by the Authority.
Minnesota Statutes §273.74 , Subd. 4 .
7 . on or before July 1 of each year , the Administrator
shall submit to the Scott County Board, all affected school
boards, and to the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development
Authority a report of the status of each tax increment dis-
trict in Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1. The in-
formation to be included in the report is given in the model
form attached hereto as EXHIBIT 1.
M
8 . An annual statement showing the tax increment re-
ceived and expended in that year , the original assessed
value, the captured assessed value, the amount of outstand-
ing bonded indebtedness and any additional information the
Authority deems necessary shall be published in the official
newspapers of the City.
Minnesota Statutes §273.74, Subd. 5 .
9 . All revenues derived from each tax increment dis-
trict shall be used in accordance with the tax increment
financing plan. The revenues shall be used for the follow-
ing purposes:
1. to pay the principal of and interest on bonds
issued to finance a project;
2 . to finance or otherwise pay the capital and
administration costs of Housing and Redevelopment Proj-
ect No. 1 pursuant to the Housing and Redevelopment Act ;
3 . to accumulate and maintain a reserve in a
+ special development account for the payment of the prin-
cipal of and interest on bonds issued to finance a pro-
ject;
4 . to pay for project costs as identified; and
5 . to finance or otherwise pay for other purposes
as provided in Section 273 .75, Subd. 4 , of the Tax In-
crement Financing Act.
These revenues shall not be used to circumvent any levy
limits.
Minnesota Statutes, §273 .75 , Subd. 4 .
A - 5
10 . In the year in which the tax increments exceed the
amount necessary to pay the costs authorized by the tax
increment financing plans, including the amount necessary to
cancel any tax levy as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Sec-
tion 475 . 61, Subd. 3, the Authority shall use the excess
amount to:
1 . prepay any outstanding bonds;
for;
2 . discharge the pledge of tax increment there-
3. pay into an escrow account dedicated to the
payment of such bonds; or
4 . return the excess amount to the County Auditor
for distribution as provided in Section 273 .75, Subd. 2,
of the Tax Increment Act .
Minnesota Statutes, 5273.75, Subd. 2.
11 . Pursuant to Section 273.75, Subd. 1, of the Tax
Increment Financing Act:
1. No tax increments shall be paid to the City
for the tax increment districts after three ( 3) years
from the date of certification of the original assessed
value of the taxable property in the tax increment dis-
tricts by the County Auditor unless within the
three(3)-year period: (a) bonds have been issued pursu-
ant to Section 273.77 or in aid of a project pursuant to
any other law, except revenue bonds issued pursuant to
Chapter 474 prior to August 1, 1979 , or (b) the Author-
ity has acquired property within the tax increment dis-
tricts or (c) the City has constructed or caused to be
constructed public improvements within the tax increment
districts.
2. The tax increments pledged to the payment of
bonds and interest thereon may be discharged and the tax
increment districts may be terminated if sufficient
funds have been irrevocably deposited in the debt ser-
vice fund or other escrow account held in trust for all
outstanding bonds to provide for the payment of the
bonds at maturity or redemption date.
3. No tax increments shall in any event be paid
to the City from the tax increment districts after eight
(8) years from the date of the receipt by the City of
the first tax increment or ten (10 ) years from approval
of each tax increment financing plan, whichever is
less. Modification of each tax increment financing plan
A - 6
EXHIBIT 1
ANNUAL DISCLOSURE REPORT
Region: Contact Person: Phone
Address:
Project Name or Number:
Type of Project (PLEASE CIRCLE):
Housing Economic Development Redevelopment
Fiscal Year:
Administering Agency:
Original Assessed Value $
Current Assessed Value $
Captured Assessed Value Retained by the
Administering Authority $
Captured Assessed Value Shared with Other
Taxing Districts (City, School District,
County, Townships, etc.) $
Amount of Tax Increment Received During this Period $
Amount of Outstanding Bond Indebtedness $
pursuant to Section 273.74 , Subd. 4 , of the Tax Incre-
ment Financing Act shall not extend the durational
limits of that provision. (Once the Authority deter-
mines the term of the tax increment district , that term
shall govern. )
4 . If , after five ( 5) years from the date of
certification of the original assessed value of the tax
increment districts pursuant to Section 273 .76 of the
Tax Increment Financing Act, no demolition, rehabil-
itation or renovation of property or other site prepara-
tion, including improvement of a street adjacent to a
parcel but not installation of an underground utility
service, has been commenced on a parcel located within
the tax increment districts by the City or by the owner
of the parcel in accordance with the tax increment
financing plans, no additional tax increments may be
taken from that parcel, and the original assessed value
of that parcel shall be excluded from the original
i assessed value of the Tax Increment Districts. If the
City or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences
demolition, rehabilitation or renovation or other site
preparation on that parcel, including improvement of a
street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance with the
tax increment financing plans, the authority shall cer-
tify to the County Auditor that the activity has com-
menced, and the .County Auditor shall certify the as-
sessed value thereof as most recently certified by the
Commissioner of Revenue and add it to the original as-
sessed value of the tax increment districts. For pur-
poses of this subdivision, "parcel" means a tract or
plat of land established as a single unit for purposes
of assessment.
A list will be maintained by the Building Inspector of
the City to document all building permits issued within the
district for private redevelopment, including alterations ,
additions , new construction and demolition.
12. The tax increments received with respect to payment
of principal and interest for bonds issued for improvements
made within the tax increment districts shall be submitted
by the Authority to the City and segregated by the Authority
in a special account or accounts on its official books and
records or as otherwise established by resolution of the
City to be held by a trustee or trustees for the benefit of
holders of the bonds .
Minnesota Statutes, 5273 .76 , Subd. 4 .
A - 7
EXPENDITURES FOR PERIOD
Bond Payments $
Land Acquisition $
Administration $
Other (please specify) $
TOTAL $
E REVENUES FOR PERIOD
Tax Increment Collected $
Interest Earned $
Land Sales $
Other (please specify) $
TOTAL $
2 —
APPENDIX B
DATES OF PUBLIC ACTION AND RESOLUTION NOS.
ESTABLISHING HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN,
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS, TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS
AND MODIFICATIONS THEREOF
DATE RESOLUTION NO. ACTION
---- Publication of Notice
of Public Hearing re-
garding action taken
by Resolution No.
January 2, 1979 Approval of Redevel-
opment Plan and es-
tablishment of Valley
Industrial Park Rede-
velopment Project No.
1.
---- Publication of Notice
of Public Hearing re-
garding action taken
by Resolution No.
July 17 , 1979 Modification of Rede-
velopment Plan for
Valley Industrial
Park Redevelopment
Project No. 1.
---- Publication of Notice
of Public Hearing re-
garding action taken
by Resolution No.
June 29 , 1982 Approval of Tax In-
crement Financing
Plan and establish-
ment of Tax Increment
District No. lA
within Downtown Rede-
velopment Project No.
1.
B - 1
---- Publication of Notice
of Public Hearing re-
garding action taken
by Resolution No.
February 28, 1984 Modification of Val-
ley Industrial Park
Redevelopment Project
No. 1 and its re-
designation as Minne-
sota River Valley
Housing and Redevel-
opment Project No. 1 .
July 11, 1984 ---- Publication of Notice
of Public Hearing re-
garding action taken
by Resolution No.
August 7, 1984 Modification of Hous-
ing and Redevelopment
Plan for Minnesota
River Valley Housing
and Redevelopment
Project No. 1. Modifi
cation of Tax Incre-
ment District No. lA
within Downtown Rede-
velopment Project No.
1 and its redesigna-
tion as Tax Increment
District No. 3 within
Minnesota River
Valley Housing and
Redevelopment Project
No. 1 . Approval of
Tax Increment
Financing Plan for
Tax Increment
t District No. 5 within
Minnesota River
Valley Redevelopment
Housing and Rede-
velopment Project
No. 1.
April , 1986 ---- Publication of Notice
Public Hearing re-
garding action taken
by Resolution No.
B - 2
May 20, 1986 Modification of
Housing and Re-
development Plan for
Minnesota River
Valley Housing and
Redevelopment Project
No. 1 . Amendment of
Tax Increment
Financing Plans
relating to Tax
Increment Financing
Districts No. 2
through No. 5 .
Establishment of Tax
Increment Financing
District No. 6 and
adoption of the Tax
Increment Financing
Plan relating
thereto.
B - 3
APPENDIX C EXERPT-FROM THE CITY OF SHAKOPEr—DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION —
D. PRELIMINARY PUBLIC COSTS- AND E REVEN - F'wA REPOF
REVENUES-
ASSOCIATED WITH DOWNTOWN
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
PUBLIC COSTS FOR PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
Mini Ey-pass
Construction : widen bridge , reconstruct
169 /101 intersection and relocate 3 blocks
of Highway 101 in a manner integrated to
local street-scape project 1 , 610 , 000
R-O-L: Acquisition : 13 parcels in blocks
2 , 3 and 5 of Shakopee City Plat 1 , 017 , 000
R-O-L: Relocation : 13 residential and 9
businesses 310 , 000
R-O-L: Demolition : 5 single family and
15 , 737 s . f . of commercial property 21 ,000
Admin . /Legal /Engineering/Planning 140 , 000
Contingency 295 , 800
a
Subtotal $3 , 393 , 800 :3 , 393 , 800
Street-scape Improvements
Road , Sidewalk : includes new curbs , pave-
ment , sidewalks , pedestrian improvements ,
la.cscaoing , tree grates and guards , plaza ,
bus shelters , kiosks and street lig:ting
Z
or area bounded by 1St and 3rd nv£^.lies ,
AtwcC6 and Sommerville 3 , 230 , CO3
Parking Lot : develop^ent of 3 lots with
pare^Ent , curbs , lighting and lands _aping ;
those designated for improvement are the
blue and gold arrow and new lot on the
abandoned railroad right-of-way 275 , 000
Adtin . /Legal /Engineering/Planning 158 , 000
Contingency 350 ,500
Subtotal $4 , 013 , 500 $4 , 013 , 500
83
Other
Underground Utilities : underground exist-
ing overhead utility lines (electrical 500 000
and railroad communications lines
Riverfront Improvements : includes trails ,
landscaping , lighting , restrooms , pedes-
trian amenities 185 , 000
Admin. /Legal/Engineering/Planning 58 , 000
Contingency 100 , 700
Subtotal 843 , 700 $ 843 , 700
GRAND TOTAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT $8 , 251 , 000
1
PUBLIC COSTS FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
Housing Assistance : could involve land
write-down , interest-rate reduction, or
equity participation 368 , 000
Relocation : 2 businesses and 6 residential
units 96 , 000
Demolition : 2 single family and 8 , 290 s . f ,
of eomnercial/multi-family housing 15 , 000
Admin . /Legal /Engineering/Planning 48 , 000
Contingency 53 , 000
GRAND TOTAL HOUSING 5580 , 000
pUELIC COSTS FOR RLhABILITATION PRDGRE';
Rehabilitation Loans 2 , 000 , 000
Admin. /Legal 30 , 000
GRAND TOTAL REHABILITATIO1, $2 ,030 , 000
*= GRAND TOTAL COSTS ** $ 10 ,861 , 000
84
b,1?-VZWUE S
Downtown Tax Increment $4 , 200 ,000*
Other Tax Increment 2 , 900 , 000
Small Cities Development Grant 750 , 000
Economic Development Grant 200 , 000
MN Department of Transportation 910 ,000
Other Transportation Funding (possibly Federal
Aid Urban, High Hazard Elimination Fund ) 583 , 800
Utilities Capital
Park Reserve 55 , 200
Park Grants/DNR 115 , 200
Capital Improvement Fund 14 , 600
Interest Income 500 , 000
Special Assessments 1 , 003 ,375
** GRAND TOTAL REVENUES *= $11 , 232 , 175
* Eased upon the refined Redevelopment Plan ,. there will be
future new construction of :
100 housing units
94 ,000 s . f. retail
40 ,000 s . f. office
This future development will create an estimated assessed
value of $7 , 169 ,000 . In addition , it is assumed that the
rehabilitation of existing buildings will create a new
assessed value of $3 ,440 , 000. The total value of nes: con-
struction and rehabilitation is estimated at $10 , 609 , 000 .
The existing value of the sites to be rehabed and the sites
which will be cleared and new buildings constructed is
$2 ,652 ,000 . This leaves an increased assessed value in the
downtown of $7 ,957 , 000 . This results in a bonding capacity
Of $7 , 000 , 000 in tax increment funding . The Downtown Com-
mittee recommended that only 605 of this bonding capacity ,
or $4 ,200 , 000 , beutilized for the hard costs outlined in the
redevelopment plan. The remaining 405 , or $2 ,800 ,000 , would
be available to subsidize individual development projects
within the project area , but outside the scope of the pre-
vious public costs .
65
c
2
Attachment #2
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
COUNTY OF SCOTT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-1
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE MODIFIED HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN RELATING TO MINNESOTA RIVER
VALLEY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF MINNNESOTA
STATUTES, SECTIONS 462. 411 TO 462 .716 , IN-
CLUSIVE, AS AMENDED; AND AMENDING THE TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS RELATING TO TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NO. 2 THROUGH
NO. 5 WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ESTAB-
LISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
NO. 6 WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATING THERETO,
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF MINNESOTA
STATUTES, SECTIONS 273.71 TO 273_78, INCLU-
SIVE, AS AMENDED.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners ( the "Com-
missioners" ) of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the
"Authority" ) in and for the City of Shakopee , Minnesota ( the
"City" ) , as follows:
Section 1. Recitals .
1. 01. It has been proposed that the Authority amend the
Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan ( the "Redevelopment
Plan" ) relating to Minnesota River Valley Housing and Rede-
velopment Project No. 1 ( the "Redevelopment Project" ) estab-
lished pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes ,
Section 462 . 411 to 462 .716 , inclusive, as amended, amend the
Tax Increment Financing Plans relating to Tax Increment
Financing Districts No. 2 through No. 5 to reflect increased
project costs and activities within the Redevelopment Proj-
ect, and establish Tax Increment Financing District No. 6 and
adopt the Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto pur-
suant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections
273 .71 to 273. 78, inclusive, as amended.
1 . 02 . This Authority has investigated the facts and has
caused to be prepared with respect thereto, an amendment to
the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project, setting
forth the public improvements to be made within the Redevel-
opment Project. This Authority has also caused to be pre-
pared, and has investigated the facts with respect to the
establishment of proposed Tax Increment Financing District
No. 6 as stated in the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan
relating thereto.
1 . 03 . The Authority has performed all actions required
by law to be performed prior to the amendment of the Rede-
velopment Plan; the amendment of the Tax Increment Financing
Plans relating to Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 2
through No. 5 ; the establishment of Tax Increment Financing
District No. 6 and the adoption of the proposed Tax Increment
Financing Plan relating thereto; has requested the written
opinion of the City ' s Planning Commission relating to the
proposed amendment of the Redevelopment Plan and adoption of
the Tax Increment Financing Plan relating to Tax Increment
Financing District No. 6 ; and has requested that the City
Council ( the "Council" ) of the City hold a public hearing
relating to the above-stated matters.
1 .04. The Authority hereby determines that it is neces-
sary and in the best interest of the Authority and the City
at this time to approve the amendment of the Redevelopment
Plan, approve the amendment of the Tax Increment Financing
Plans relating to Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 2
through No. 5, approve establishment of Tax Increment
Financing District No. 6 and the proposed Tax Increment
Financing Plan relating thereto.
Section 2. Approval of Amendment of Tax Increment
Financing Plans Relating to Tax Increment Financing Districts
No. 2 through and No. 5 .
Subject to the finding, determination and approval of the
amendment of the Tax Increment Financing Plans relating to
Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 2 through No. 5 by the
Council, the proposed amendment of said Tax Increment
Financing Plans to reflect increased project activities and
costs within the Redevelopment Project, as described in the
Redevelopment Plan approved in Section 4 hereof is hereby
approved by the Commissioners of the Authority.
Section 3. Approval of Tax Increment Financing District
No. 6.
Subject to the finding, determination, and approval of
the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 6
by the Council , proposed Tax Increment Financing District No.
6 within the Redevelopment Project No. 1 is hereby approved
by the Commissioners of the Authority. The property included
in said Tax Increment Financing District shall be the prop-
erty described in the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan
relating thereto, as approved in Section 4 hereof .
- 2 -
Section 4 . Approval of Redevelopment Plan and Tax Incre-
ment Financing Plan.
The proposed amendment of the Redevelopment Plan for the
Redevelopment Project , and the adoption of the proposed Tax
Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District
No. 6 (collectively referred to as the "Plans" ) , presented to
the Authority on this date, are hereby approved and adopted
by the Authority.
Section 5 . Filing of Plans .
The Authority shall cause the Plans, as finally approved
and adopted, to be filed with the Minnesota Department of
Energy and Economic Development .
Section 6 . Certification of Assessed Value .
Upon approval of the establishment of Tax Increment
Financing District No. 6 and the adoption of the proposed Tax
Increment Financing Plan relating thereto by the Council , the
Authority shall request the County Auditor of Scott County
( the "County Auditor" ) to certify the original assessed value
of the real property within Tax Increment Financing District
No. 6 , as described in the Tax Increment Financing Plan re-
lating thereto.
Dated: May 20 , 1986
Chairman
Attest :
Executive Director
F
3 -
Secretary ' s Certificate
I , the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting
Secretary of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and
for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, hereby certify that I
have carefully compared the attached and foregoing resolution
with the original thereof on file in my office and further
certify that the same is a full, true and complete transcript
therefrom, insofar as the same relates to the approval of an
amendment of the Redevelopment Plan relating to Minnesota
River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 , the
creation of Tax Increment Financing District No. 6 , the adop-
tion of the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating
thereto, and the amendment of the Tax Increment Financing
Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 2 through No.
5 .
I further certify that said resolution was duly adopted
r by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelop-
ment Authority in and for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, at
a duly called and regularly held regular or special meeting
thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such Secretary this
day of 1986 .
Secretary
Housing and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City
of Shakopee, Minnesota
4
,4
Attachment #3
Councilmember introduced the
following resolution, the reading of which was dispensed
with by unanimous consent , and moved its adoption:
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
COUNTY OF SCOTT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2543
RESOLUTION CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENT OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN RELATING TO
MINNESOTA RIVER VALLEY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NO. 1 ; THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF THE TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICTS NO. 2 THROUGH NO. 5; THE
PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
f DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ADOPTION OF THE TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR
. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council" ) of
the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the "City" ) , as follows:
Section 1 . Public Hearing. At the request of the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota (the "Authority" ) , this Council shall
meet on Tuesday, May 20, 1986 , at approximately 7: 30 p.m. ,
to hold a public hearing on the following matters: (a) the
amendment of the Redevelopment Plan relating to the Author-
ity' s Minnesota River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Pro-
ject No. 1 (the "Project" ) , (b) the establishment by the
Authority of Tax Increment Financing District No. 6 (here-
inafter referred to as the "Tax Increment Financing Dis-
trict" ) within the Project, (c) the adoption of the proposed
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Tax Increment Financing
District , and (d) the amendment of the tax increment financ-
ing plans for Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 through
No. 5 , all pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 462. 411 to 462. 716, inclusive, as
amended, Minnesota Statutes, Section 273 . 74 , subd. 4 , as
amended, and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273 . 71 to 273 . 78,
inclusive, as amended.
Section 2. Notice of Hearing; Filing of Plans. The
Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the
hearing, substantially in the form attached hereto as Ex-
hibit A, to be given as required by law, to place a copy of
the proposed Redevelopment Plan and proposed Tax Increment
Financing Plan on file in the City Clerk ' s office and to
make such plans available for inspection by the public,
commencing April 16, 1986.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, on April 15, 1986.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by Councilmember
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
favor thereof: voted in
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and
adopted, and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the
City Clerk.
ATTEST: Mayor
Clerk
2 -
EXHIBIT A
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
COUNTY OF SCOTT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council ( the "Coun-
cil" ) of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, will hold a public
hearing on Tuesday, May 20 , 1986, at a regular meeting of
the Council commencing at approximately 7 :30 o ' clock p.m. ,
to be held at the Shakopee City Hall, 129 East First Avenue,
relating to the proposed amendment by the Housing and Rede-
velopment Authority in and for the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota ( the "Authority" ) , of its Redevelopment Plan
relating to Minnesota River Valley Housing and Redevelopment
Project No. 1 ( the "Project" ) and the establishment of the
Authority ' s Tax Increment Financing District No. 6 within
the Project, all pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections
462. 411 to 462. 716 , inclusive, as amended, Minnesota Stat-
utes, Section 273 .74, subd. 4 , as amended, and Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 273 . 71 to 273. 78, inclusive, as
amended. The hearing is also relative to the adoption of
the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment
Financing District No. 6 and the amendment of the tax incre-
ment financing plans for the Authority ' s existing Tax Incre-
ment Financing Districts No. 2 through No. 5, copies of
which changes will be on file and available for public
inspection in the City Clerk ' s office not later than April
16 , 1986 .
p
A - 1
Clerk ' s Certificate
I , the undersigned, being duly
Clerk of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, hereby certify
that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing
resolution with the original thereof on file in my office nd
further certify that the same is a full , true and complete
transcript therefrom, insofar as the same relates to the
calling of a public hearing on a proposal for the amendment
of the Redevelopment Plan relating to Minnesota River Valley
Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1, the creation of Tax
Increment Financing District No.
n of the
proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan hrelating othereto, and
the amendment of the Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax
Increment Financing Districts No. 2 through No. 5.
I further certify that said resolution was duly adopted
by the Shakopee City Council at a duly called and regularly
held regular or special meeting thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such Clerk and the cor-
porate seal of the City this day of
1986.
City Clerk
Shakopee, Minnesota
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF _qE CITY COUNCIL
ADJ. REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MARCH 20, 1986
Mayor Reinke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Cncl. Colligan,"
Wampach, and Vierling present. Cncl. Leroux arrived at 7:06 p.m. Cncl. T,ebens
was absent. Also present were John K. Anderson, City Administrator, Kenneth
Ashfeld, City Engineer, Julius A. Coller, II, City Attorney, Judi Simac, City
Planner, and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk.
Colligan/Vierling moved to approve the minutes-of February 25, 1986 and
March 4, 1986. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Reinke asked if there was anyone present who wished to address the
Council on any item not on the agenda, there was no response.
Barry Stock, Administrative Aide, explained that the staff has been working
with Mr. John Gibbs from the law firm of Herbst and Thue on the drafting of
the cable franchise ordinance which incorporates the cable franchise modifica-
tions as discussed at previous City Council meetings. Discussion ensued on
the proposed franchise changes. Cncl. Leroux asked if there was any chance of
getting other proposals for public access studio management rather
than just the two we have currently. Barry Stock replied that the school
district has stated that they would be willing to submit a proposal if we
were not satisfied with either of the proposals already submitted.
Leroux/Wampach moved to table the proposed Cable Franchise Amendment. Motion
carried unanimously.
Leroux/Wampach moved to offer resolution No. 2533, A Resolution Receiving
a Report and Calling a Hearing on Improvement of Fourth Avenue from Fillmore
Street to Scott Street, Project No. 1986-3.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Leroux/Colligan moved to accept the letter of resignation of Ms. Jeanne Andre,
Community Development Director, with regrets and direct staff to prepare a
resolution of thanks for her years of service to the City. Motion carried
unanimously.
Discussion ensued on the advertising of the position of Community Development
Director and the qualifications needed.
Vierling/Wampaah moved to authorize payment of bills in the amount of
$166,197.00.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Leroux/Vierling moved to take a 5-minute recess at 7:25 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
Wampach/Vierling moved to reconvene at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Colligan/Vierling moved to open public hearing on Land Use Alternatives for
the Racetrack Area. Motion carried unanimously.
Members of the Planning Commission present were: Dave Czaja, Dave Pomerenke,
Jane VanMaldeghem and John Schmitt.
Shakopee City Council
March 20, 1986
The City Planner gave a brief update .for the benefit of the audience that in
December 19859 Hoisington Group Inc. was hired to do a land use study of the
racetrack area and along with that to consider a special development district
which would allow for uses which would be compatible to the racetrack area.
A Racetrack District Land Use Study Committee was appointed which includes
two members of the Council, two members of the Planning Commission and a
member of the Industrial-Commercial Commission and the City Planner.
Fred Hoisington, Hoisington Group Inc. addressed the audience listing what they
have been doing in this study. A list of plan objectives and Compatible
Uses have been found acceptable by the Committee. The plan objectives are:
1 . To encourage high quality development in the vicinity of
the race track.
2. To develop a high level of compatibility between heavy industrial
and racetrack uses with vegetation screens, land use transitions
and the segregation of traffic according to function and destination.
3. To establish commercial/light industrial uses that are compatible
with the race track environment and that primarily satisfy the needs
of the Canterbury Downs/Valleyfair patrons and the employees of
the race track and the industrial park.
4. To encourage commercial development at the race track that compliments
and does not detract from downtown redevelopment efforts.
5. To protect important natural features (trees, slopes, etc.) and
sensitively integrate development with the natural landscape.
6. To avoid stripped and scattered development patterns in favor of
development clusters.
7. To properly locate uses and space accesses to the Study Area
street system to maintain maximum traffic efficiency.
The following list of uses appear to be highly compatible with-:the race track
setting without detracting from development in other parts of the City and
could be considered as permitted uses in a Special Race Track District:
1 . A licensed Class A race track which includes the following accessory
uses and facilities—
a. Race track offices
b. Employee housing and dormitories
c. Horse barns
d. Paaamutual wagering
e. Internalized eating and drinking concessions
f. off-street parking
g. Recreation vehicle parking with full hookups
h. Horse training, exercise and grooming facilities
i. Maintenance facilities
j. Private clubs and lodges
2. Hotels, motels and conference centers.
3. - Eating and drinking establishments excluding fast food or drive-up
restaurants.
Shakopee City Council /
March 20, 1986
Page —3—
Convenience retail sales and service establishments which primarily
serve the needs of race track patrons and employees.
5. Commercial recreation uses including golf courses, miniature golf
courses, bowling alleys and similar uses.
6. Athletic clubs for tennis, racquetball, aerobics, swimming, running
and similar recreation activities.
7. Community park, recreation and open space uses which do not conflict
with race track operations but including winter activities.
8. Business and corporate offices.
9. Recreation vehicle parks with full hookups, recreational facilities,
etc.
10. Horse related land uses including boarding, training, showing, grooming
and veterinary clinics.
There are two major components which exist within the study area, the first
is industrial development, some of which has been here for 20 years along
TH 101 . The second component being the impending 101 bypass and access in
the vicinity of CR 83. Some of the things that the Committee was asked to
deal with was natural conditions. Mr. Hoisington gave a review of the
study area overlay. In addition to the two major components there is a band
of oak trees along--12th avenue and-.Valley Park Drive and also a band of trees
just north of the race track that the committee would like to see preserved.
Concept Plan 1 and Concept Plan 2 were reviewed. : The ultimate plan is to keep
things the way they are as much as possible. In concept plan 1 the interchange
would be located at 83 and proposed 101 bypass. In concept plan 2 the inter-
change would be located at 16 and the proposed 101 bypass which would allow for
access to the race track from the south side. From a traffic standpoint Concept
Plan 2 would work better. Questions were opened up to the Council.
Cncl."beroux asked what the impact of a major corporate development within
the industrial park, for example IBM, Control Data, Sperry, anything that
might impact anything upwards of 200 jobs. Mr. Hoisington answered that
the impact of traffic would be very-little--if we were talking of 200 jobs,
however if it were 800 jobs it quite possibly would have an impact of the
streets. MN DOT has estimated 50 to 60 percent more traffic on the bypass
due to the race track. Cncl�Leroux also asked when the City might be in
possession of the MN DOT traffic studies. The last date that Mr. Hoisington
had heard was April 1 , 1986.
Comm. Schmitt asked what kind of acreage was involved in the multi—family area.
Mr. Hoisington replied that there is 132 acres already zoned multi—family, of
which 14 or 15 have been used which leaves a total of 109 under concept plan 1
or under concept plan 2 we would double. The question was also raised as to
the motel and hotel proposals around the racetrack area. Mr. Hoisington
answered that the general consensus of the study shows that the race track
does not generally generate that much overnight stays. Cncl. Wampach asked
__.-.-.-_. how much industrial acreage we have now in the racetrack study area. Mr.
Hoisington answered that right now we have more than enough the only thing
we are short of is agricultural.
Questions were opened up to the citizens.
Snaxopee uiiy _u�. ;l L
March 20, 1986
Page -4-
Greg Voss, Hopkins, raised the question as to what the odds were of MN DOT''^
switching the interchange on the bypass. Mr. IIoisington stated that he could
not answer that question at this time. Right now the completion date is
set for 1991 that is the first stage which is from County Road 83 East.
Ed Christian stated that under both plans there is access from Shenandoah
Drive on the west, 16 on the south and 83 on the east, however it stops
short of 4th avenue on the north. Trr. '-ioisington answered that one of the
things the Committee is considering is an expansion of the race track district
up to 4th Avenue.
Mr. Kenneth W. Green, a partner of Mr. Quayle raised several questions in
regards to the race track study area including due process, definition of
the study area, etc. Consensus was that the consultant would meet
with him on an individual basis, along with the City Planner, to explain
the study process to date and to accept his comments.
Colligan/Wampach moved to close public hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
Wampach/Leroux moved for a recess at 9:10 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux/Wampach moved to reconvene at 9:25 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
----------
Dave
----Dave Czaja, Chairman of the City Planning Commission addressed the Council
on the issue of their reasons for the rezoning of the Ackerberg property.
With previous joint meetings and zoning applications it was the Commissions
thought that they had pretty well established themselves as to the direction
of our City and the direction of the City Council. This particular piece
of property was in direct conflict with Planning Commission thinking regarding
the changes in zoning and the Planning Commission could not see with the
reasons listed how that rezoning took place. Cncl. Leroux replied that the
fact that it did not cost the City any money and that "it was a good project"
was not a basis for rezoning, it was just a comment made at the table, it
did not have a bearing at all on the rezoning decision. Which brings in
the matter of simply a difference of opinion at theis table as well as the
Commissions.
Rod Krass, ,Assistant City Attorney, addressed the Commission as to what
he was asked to do and his legal opinion of this matter. He had previously
given the Council and Planning Commission a written opinion as to what
constitutes spot zoning. His consensus was that it very well may be a
difference of opinion. The City Planner read from Section 11._0_4, Subd. 7, -1
of the City Code regarding findings required for amendments:
11Such amendments should not be issued indiscriminately but shall
be based on findings or criteria including but not limited to:
the original zoning ordinance is in error, significant changes in
community goals and policies that have taken place, significant
changes in city-wide or neighborhood development patterns have
occurred and implementing the comprehensive plan's growth manage-
ment program."
Council concluded its discussion with Planning Commission with the consensus
that Planning Commission should continue to make its own rezoning decisions
based upon how it felt any given request met the four criteria in Section
11.04 Subd. 7 of the code.
Shakopee City Council
March 20, 1986
Page -5-
Leroux/Vierling moved to adjourn to March 25, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. Motion
carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 10:50 p.m.
Judith.S. Cox
City Clerk
Carol Schultz
Recording Secretary
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REG. SESSION SH_kKOPEE, MINNESOTA MARCH 25, 19'86
Mayor Reinke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Cncl. Wampach, Colligan,
and Vierling present. Cncl. Leroux and Lebens were absent. Also present were
John K. Anderson, City Administrator, Kenneth Ashfeld, City Engineer, Julius A.
Coller, II, City Attorney and Judi Simac, City Planner
Liaison reports were given by Councilmembers.
Mayor Reinke asked if there was anyone present who wished to address the
Council on any item not on the agenda, there was no response.
Colligan/Vierling moved to receive and place on file the letter from W. Brooks
Fields, President and Chief Executive Officer of Canterbury Downs regarding
the opening of the racetrack on Friday, April 25, 1986. Motion carried
unanimously.
Wampach/Colligan moved to receive and place on file the letter from LeRoy J.
Heitz announcing his resignation as of April 1 , 1986. Motion carried unanimously.
Wampach/Colligan moved to direct staff to draft a letter to send to the
Governor and representatives asking to hold a special session regarding a
budget bill for the State. Motion carried unanimously.
Colligan/Vierling moved to table the memo from Barry Stock, Administrative
Aide, regarding Council Chambers Sound System. Discussion ensued on what
could be done with the old system. Motion carried unanimously.
Colligan/Vierling moved to install a new rolled roofing for about $2,500,
which is warranted for 2 years on the City Hall before the 2nd floor is
occupied. Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Vierling/Wampach moved to authorize the appointment of Fulton Schleisman as
our contract assistant building inspector at the same pay scale he is now
employed at $26,220.00. Motion carried unanimously.
Wampach/Colligan moved to approve the application and grant an Off Sale 3.2
Beer License to Brooks Superettes #42, Canterbury Park Retail Center at CR-83
and 12th Avenue. Motion carried unanimously.
Colligan/Vierling moved to nominate Dears Roper and Garr Hartmann for Community
Services Board; Mark Houser and Gene Foudray for Planning Commission; and
Donald Koopmann for Industrial Commercial Commission. Motion carried unanimously.
Colligan/Vierling moved to waive the 30 day waiting period for a gambling
license from the Minn. Charitable Gambling Control Board for Shak—O—Valley
Amateur Hockey, Inc. at 124 West 1st Avenue.
Roll Call: byes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Colligan/Vierling moved to table the memo from Jeanne Andre outlining the staff
to work with Mr. Bakken, the applicant, to put together a tax increment financing
project for the expansion of Shakopee Valley Motel. Motion carried unanimously.
Shakopee City Council
March 25, 1986
Page -2-
Colligan/Vierling moved to table the memo from Judi Simac, City Planner
regarding Appeal of Board of Adjustment and Appeals decision Re: SuperAmerica
Signs. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Colligan moved to grant preliminary plat approval of Maplewood
Townhouses 1st Addn. , subject to conditions recommended by the Planning
Commission . The conditions recommended are:
1 . Approved Title Opinion by the City Attorney.
2. Name of plat be revised to Maplewood Townhouses 1st Addition.
3. All dedicated easements and amendments as negotiated with Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission be shown on the plat.
4. Approval of Home Owner's Association covenants by the City
Attorney.
Motion carried unanimously.
Colligan/Wampach offered Resolution 2536, A Resolution Approving the Final:
Plat of GardenVilla 1st Addn; and move its adoption with the following
reouirements:
1 . Approval of a Tital Opinion by the City Attorney.
2. Recording of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions, the By-Laws and the Articles of Incorporation.
3. Payment of $4,113.65 Park Dedication fee prior to filing the
plat.
4. Separate Agreement accompanied by a Letter of Credit which guarantees
the reconstructed driveway access onto CSAR 17.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Resolution passes
Vierling/4lampach offered Resolution 2535, as amended, A Resolution Setting
Forth City Policy with Respect to Homeowner's Associations Required by Shakopee
City Code Section 12.11 , Subd., 1 (J), and move for its adoption.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Resolution passes
Wampach/Colligan moved to direct the Planning Commission to begin the
process of officially mapping 13th Avenue. Discussion
ensued on what does need to be done as far as plotting and surveying the
street on the map.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried
Wampach/Colligan moved to authorize the firm of Orr-Schelen Mayeron, and
Assoc., Inc. to conduct the survey and alignment of 13th Avenue for a cost
not to exceed ($10,000.00 .
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried
Shakopee City Council
March 25, 1986
Page -3-
The City Planner reviewed the Phases involved in the Racetrack District
Land Use Study which include:
Phase 1A - Needs Assessment (evaluation of what exists within the
study area)
Phase 1B - Plan Formation (graphic map, at which time two are being
considered)
Phase 1C - Documentation (includes a record of the proceedings of the
study,-:nee.ds statement, plan description and
map and market study documentation)
Phase IT - Implementation (Preparation of appropriate zoning ordinance
amendments)
Vierling/Wampach moved to authorize Hoisington Group Inc. to prepare Phase II
of the Racetrack District Land Use Study at the hourly rate schedule of:
Senior Professional 870/hr
Professional Staff 335-50/hr
Technical Staff $25-35/hr
Secretarial $20-25/hr
total fee not to exceed $5,000.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Barry Stocki Administrative Aide, gave an update on the selection of Dial-a-Ride
provider. Discussion ensued on the three bids received for dial-a-ride.
It was stated that there will be a handicapped vehicle available if given a
24-hour notice. There will be two mini vans available with access to a 15-
passenger van as well.
Colligan/Wampach moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to accept the
low bid offered by Kase Kabs in the amount of $17.90 per vehicle per hour.
Additionally, authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into a two-
year contract with a third year renewable at the option of the City with
Kare Kabs, with an amendment to have an additional vehicle to be available
at the same price within 60 days.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
An update was given by Barry Stock on the subject of Van Pool Provider.
'The current van pool provider gave two proposals one of which did address
our need for a 75,000 mile termination clause with an on-site manager at
the cost of $58,000 per year. The other proposal was to keep the status
quo.
l-,lampach/Colligan moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to enter
into a commuter van pool contract with Ian Pool Se,vi ces Tnr._ in -which the
status quo is maintained. Additionally, the contract duration shall be one
year with an additional year at the option of the City.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Shakopee City Council
March 25, 1986
Page -4-
The City Engineer gave an update on Landscaping for 2nd Avenue Parking Lot.
Currently the parking lot does need one additional coat of bituminous and
then the restoration. The grade is not a problem and any construction to the
parking lot to change that grade is not necessary. The cost of this project
was discussed, 0.80,000 was an approximate cost of street scaping given for
2nd Avenue. Discussion ensued on Tax Increment Financing in regards to the
street scaping.
Vierling7Colligan moved to table the memo from Jeanne Andre regarding the
Landscaping for 2nd Avenue Parking Lot and refer it back to Downtown
Committee. Motion carried unanimously.
Colligan/Vierling moved to approve payment of bills in amount of $56,587.19.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Aloes: None Motion carried.
Mayor Reinke read a letter in regards to Senior Citizen coordination, in
regards to the parking lot located on Lewis and Holmes and 2nd .-Avenue.
Suggestion wasgiven that a time limit be posted on the parking space
and steps and striped parking space be provided. Consensus was that the
City Administrator will respond to Lavina Busacker's letter.
Colligan/Vierling moved to authorize payment of Semi-Final Estimate No. 5
for 1984 Curb & Gutter, Sidewalk, and Driveway Approach Replacement Program 84-2
in the amount of $1 ,375.97 to Siehndel Construction, 210 Elmwood, Le Sueur, MN
56058.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried
Colligan/Vierling moved to request the County to conduct a street light
warrants study at the intersection of CSAR 16 & CSAH 83 and CSAR 16 & CSAH 89.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Names: None Motion carried.
Colligan/vierling moved to authorize staff to accept quotations and disburse
funds not to exceed $8,400.00 for the purchase of two used vehicles and
radio equipment, for the Engineering Department.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Colligan/Vierling moved to direct the City Engineer to offer temporary
employment to Quinten Hammer and Dave Benson on a "as needed" basis as
determined by the City Engineer at a salary rate of $9.98 per hour.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Colligan/Vierling moved to adopt the 1986-91 Capital Improvement Program -
Parks which George Muenchow and Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director
have prepared.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Shakopee City Council
March 25, 1986
Page -5-
Vierling/Wampach moved to table the 1986-91 Capital Improvement Program until
all the members of the City Council are present. Motion carried unanimously.
Colligan/Vierling moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute
a two-year contract with Teamsters Local No. 320 - Police for salary and
benefits for 1986-87.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Vierling/Wampach moved to table the T.I.F. vs Taxes Comparison. Motion
carried unanimously.
Colligan/Vierling moved to receive 1985 Annual Reports. Motion carried
unanimously.
Colligan/vierling moved to hold over the request to Conduct a Speed Study
and Determine Safe Speed Limits on County State Aid Highway 17 between 7.1101
and 10th Avenue until the street lighting goes in, and also inform the
Planning Commission as to why we are holding this over. Motion carried
unanimously.
Colligan/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2532, a Resolution Adopting a
General Retention Schedule, and move its adoption.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Wampach/Colligan offered Resolution 2531, A Resolution Amending Resolution No.
2492 adopting the 1986 pay schedule for the officers and non-union employees
of the City of Shakopee, _Minnesota_,_and moved its adoption.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Vierling/Colligan offered Resolution No. 2537, a Resolution Accepting Bid
on the 1986 Curb and Gutter, Sidewalk, and Driveway Apron Replacement Program,
Project No. 1986-2. and moved its adoption.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Cncl. Colligan asked for an update on the Electrical Inspector. The City
Administrator stated that Roy Baker is up and will have to check with his
physician as to whether he will be able to continue inspections and when.
Vierling/Wampach moved to adjourn meeting until April 1 , 1986. Meeting adjourned
at 9:55 P.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Judith Cox,
City Clerk
Carol Schultz
Recording Secretary
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
RECULA.R SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APRIL 1 , 1986
Mayor Reinke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Cncl. Leroux,
Vierling, Lebens and Wampach present. Also present were John K. Anderson,
City Admr. ; Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director; lien Ashfeld,
City Engineer; and Julius A. Coller, II, City Attorney. Cncl. Colligan
arrived at 7:50 p.m.
Lebens/Vierling moved to recess for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
Wampach/Vierling moved to reconvene at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Liaison reports were given by the councilmembers.
Leroux/Lebens moved to receive the letter from Minnesota Department of
Health regarding proposed site for Well #7 and forward-.:-it to Shakopee
Public Utilities Co. Motion carried unanimously.
Wampach/Vierling moved to receive and place on file the memo from the
` Association of Metropolitan Municipalities regarding the Annual Meeting
Information and Legislative Update. Motion carried unanilmausly.
Discussion ensued on the Appeal of Board of Adjustment and Appeals decision
regarding SuperAmerica Signs. Mike Holt, Burnsville gave a slide presentation
showing how other SuperAmerica signs are. They have decided to take the
SA out but will keep the panels, overall this will result in less signage
than originally planned for, which is actually a new proposal not an appeal.
Leroux/Wampach moved to refer back to the Planning Commission. Motion
carried unanimously.
The City Administrator reviewed the process involved in City Council voting_
and making appointments to boards and commissions.
Dean Roper and Gary-Hartmann"both introduced themselves to the Council and
told why -they would like to be appointed to the Community Services Board.
Mark Houser and Gene Foudray introduced themselves to the Council and
told why they would like to be appointed to the Planning Commission.
Donald Koopman introduced himself to the Council and told about himself and
his interest in the Industrial Commercial Commission.
Council balloted for the opening for Community Services Board:
Dean Roper: Cncl. Vierling
Gary Hartmann: Cncl. Lebens, Leroux, Colligan, Wampach and Mayor Reinke
Council balloted for the opening for Planning Commission:
Mark Houser: Cncl. Vierling
Gene Foudray: Cncl. Lebens, Leroux, Colligan, Wampach and Mayor Reinke
Council balloted for Industrial Commercial Commission for an unexpired term
expiring January 31, 1988:
Donald Koopman: Cncl. Lebens, Wampach, Vierling, Leroux, Colligan and Mayor
Reinke
Shakopee City Cauncil
April 1 , 1986
Page —2—
Leroux/Vierling moved that a unanimous ballot be cast for Gary Hartmann for
Community Services for a two year term expiring January 31, 1988. Motion
carried unanimously. .
Cclligan/Leroux moved that a unanimous ballot be cast for Gene Foudray for
Planning Commission for an unexpired term expiring January 31, 1988. Motion
carried unanimously.
Cncl. Leroux expressed the Councils thanks to Dean Roper and Mark Houser
and asked that they apply again should another opening come up.
Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director addressed the Shakopee Urban
Service Area Negotiations with Net Council issue. The three main steps
involved in setting a sever s.erpice area are as follows:
1 . Estimate population and employment growth for a ten or twenty
year period based on historic growth patterns of the area and
the demographic trends for the whole metropolitan area.
2. Using historical trends of land absorption for population and
employment growth estimate the land supply necessary to satisfy
the projected growth.
3. Using aefial photographs, determine available undeveloped land
and draw a line to limit future growth based on observed develop-
able land, removing land that is wetland, bedrock or otherwise
judged to be uisuitable for development (using maps which identify
these areas with natural impediments to development).
Jeanne Andre further stated that her recommendations are to look at the
population growth of the area and also the supply available as far as
acreage in a given area. The last seems to appear as a black box in the
Met Council process, and that is the land needed to meet popilation and
Employment Estimates. The City Planner has been working cooperatively
with the Met Council regarding this subject.
It was the consensus of the Council that a meeting be set up with Met
Council staff to make the case as outlined in this meeting, and also
request that Sandra Garderbring and/or Ray Joachim are also in attendance.
Leroux/Wampach moved to accept the proposal submitted by New Prontier
Productions as the staffing plan for the Shakopee Public Access Studio.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried
Leroux/'ierling moved to take the Cable Franchise Amendment off the table.
Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling offered Ordinance Xo. 194, An Ordinance to Amend Shakopee
City Code, Chapter 15, entitled "Cable Communications, Franchise Ordinance"
and moved its adoption.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Leroux/Vierling moved to request the Shakopee Communitv Access Corporation to
enter into an agreement with Zylstra-United Cable Television Company as shown
in attachment No. 3 of Barry Stock's memo dated March 14, 1986. (Doc. No.
CC 110)
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried.
Shakopee City Council
April 1 , 1986
Page —4—
It was discussed and agreed that the First & Whinney Costing and Staffing
Study be put on the top of the agenda for the April 15, 1986 City Council
meeting.
Colligan/Leroux moved to direct staff to proceed with legal documents for
the Shakopee Valley Square Tax Increment Project based on a tax—exempt
bond sale and inclusion of road improvements for Bluff Avenue which provide
for an estimated 15 year term for the district.
Roll Call: Ayes: Cncl. Wampach, Vierling, Leroux, Colligan and Mayor Reinke
Noes: Cncl. Lebens
Motion carried
I_.eroux/Vierling moved to authorize staff to proceed in obtaining cost
quotations and the subsequent acquisition of a portable sound system
from authorized Shure manufacturer installers at a cost not to exceed
X5000. Money to be taken from the contingency fund.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried
Leroux/Vierling moved to return the cable company's 4 channel mixer and
authorize staff to donate a portion of our existing system including
three micorophones, one 4 channel mixer, amplifier and the speakers to
the Shakopee Access Corporation and trade the rest in onithe purchase
cost of a new system.
Roll Call: Ayes : Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried
Colligan/Wampach offered Resolution No. 2538, a Resolution of Appreciation
to Jeanne Andre, and move its adoption. Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2539, A Resolution of Appreciation
to LeRoy Heitz, and move its adoption. Motion carried unanimously.
Vierling/Leroux moved that Shanahan Associates be hired to do the appraising
of Shenandoah Drive Improvement Appeal and Valley Park Drive Condemnation.
Roll Call: Ayes: Cncl-:--Leroux, Colligan, Vierling, Lebens and Mayor Reinke
Noes: Cncl. Wampach
Motion carried
Leroux/Vierling moved to authorize the payment of the requested fee from NSP
for the relocation of poles along 4th Avenue and authorize Krass & Monroe
to forward to them with correspondence reserving the City's right to attempt
to recover that fee.
Roll Call: Ayes: Cncl. Leroux, Lebens, Leroux, Wampach and Mayor Reinke
with Cncl. Colligan abstaining.
Motion carried
Leroux/Lebens moved to adjourn to April 8, 1986 at 7:00 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 11 :35 p.m.
Judith S. Cox
City Clerk
Carol Schultz
Recording Secretary
Shakopee City Council
April 1 , 1986
Page -3-
.k general discussion of TH 101 Improvements at Raceway Park with regards
to the costs and benefits of the City's involvement took place between
Council members and the City Fhgineer. The City Administrator suggested
we get information from 1, DOT about financing and then set up a meeting
with MN DOT and council.
Vierling/Wampach moved to approve the expenditure of funds from Public Works
General Fund not to exceed "1 ,900.00 for -2- lights and installation plus an
additional 823.00 per month for power and maintenance at. the two entrances
to Horizon Heights. Motion carried unanimously.
Wampach/Vierling moved for a 5 minute recess at 9:05 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling moved to reconvene at 9:15 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux/Vierling moved that the City donote a family swimming pass to the
Shakopee pool to the League of Women Voters for its silent auction.
Roll call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried
Bruce Powers, President of Pow—Bell Construction Corp. addressed the Council
on the Merchants Hotel Renovation Rent Application, requesting the City
consider them as a developer..
Leroux/Wampach moved to direct the appropriate City officials to draft a
developers agreement between the City of Shakopee and the Pow—Bell Construc—
tion Corporatirn for the renovation of the Merchants Hotel for Council
review and action.
Roll Call: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: None Motion carried
The City Administrator gave a background of the proposed Scott County
Ordinance No. 9 Regulating the Surface Use of Water within Scott County.
Vierling/Colligan moved to concur with proposed Ordinance No. 9 (revised)
Regulating The Surface Use of Mater within Scott County.
Motion carried unanimously.
Discussion ensued on TIF vs. taxes comparison. The City Administrator
reviewed the assumptions .used in developing the schedules listed in the
memo from Gregg Voxland dated March 19, 1986 regarding TIF vs. taxes
c
Comparison. (Doc. No. CC 111)
%eroux/Vierling moved to direct theappropriate city officials to select
one new police officer through the Minnesota Police Officers Recruitment
Program. Motion carried unanimously.
Colligan/Lebens moved to authorize the appropriate City Officials to
advertise for a new Community Development Director based upon the job
description outline provided in John Anderson's memo dated March 27, 1986.
(Doc. No. CC 112) Motion carried unanimously.
M7MO TO: Mayor and City Council-,
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Petition Listing Pedestrian Concerns About Highway
101 Traffic Signals, Crosswalks Enforcement Etc.
DATE: April 11, 1986
Introduction
The City Council has received the attached petition from senior
citizens, downtown businessmen and others outlining pedestrian
safety problems for people crossing Highway 101. This petition
follows a recent pedestrian accident on Highway 101 and a petition
that City Council received in June of 1985 . The City contacted
Mn/DOT after the June, 1985 petition and Mn/DOT lengthen the
"walk/don' t walk" cycle at the intersection of First and Lewis.
This information was forwarded to Lavine Busacker by me in October
of 1985 ( letters attached) . With the recent accident concerned
citizens are seeking more and better solutions.
Requested Action from March 29 , 1986 Petition
The last paragraph of the petition has been marked with the
numbers 1 through 6 indicating for City Council the actions
the petitioners are requesting that the City and/or the Highway
Department take to improve pedestrian safety crossing First
Avenue. I have been able to obtain an initial response to items
1 through 6 by talking to a number of City department heads
about the requested items. The items that follow are listed
in the same order that they occur in the petition.
1. TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT
Tom Brownell has indicated that the State Patrol has seven
troopers to provide 24 hour service in a two county area.
Shakopee received more service from the State Patrol than
any other community in the two county area.
Tom has also indicated that requests for service from his
department in the downtown area are exceeding the department ' s
resources. The request for service require one full time
patrol position to be assigned to the area to provide traffic
enforcement, enforcement of the two hour on and off street
parking requirement, prevention of vehicles from blocking
intersections, preventing motorists from using the alley
behind City Hall ( a recent Planning Commission request) ,
and the possibility of having a patrol officer assist people
across First Avenue ( a suggestion one Councilmember recently
asked we check into) . Tom noted that should we provide
this latter service we will be incurring direct liability
in the event of an accident.
20 SIGNALS THAT WORK
I have spoken with the Police Department, the Sheriff ' s
Department and the Shakopee Public Utilities. The attached
memo from Lou VanHout indicates the procedures Shakopee
Public Utilities uses. It has been suggested that some
communities use small red flashing lights on the top of
signals to indicate that there is a light out or a malfunction.
This warning method could be investigated through Mn/DOT.
Also under this subject improved crosswalk painting has
been suggested. Jim Karkanen has suggested several alter-
natives: ( a) Obtain Mn/DOT assistance to apply heat treated
crosswalks with a quicker drying paint. Jim noted that
the State hasn' t started painting yet, because of the whether/
season. Because of the traffic of Highway 101 painting
is normally begun at 2 : 00 a.m. which requires warm nights.
(b) Request that Mn/DOT do the first painting of the season,
and instruct our City crews to make any subsequent paintings
as needed. (c) Instruct our crews to make the crosswalks
using a clorinated rubber paint product. This product
costs approximately $1. 00 more per gallon and requires
warmer whether to apply. (d) Try to paint temporary crosswalks
in colder whether as early as possible on the Holmes Street,
Lewis Street and Fuller Street intersections with Highway
101 . Other intersections could be painted later along
with a repainting of these intersections should they need
it. (e) Contract with a crosswalk painting firm that would
have specialized equipment for applying paint under less
than ideal conditions. ( f) Apply permanent pavement markings
when the streets are overlayed.
Jim Karkanen noted that in considering these alternatives
Council should be aware that during the spring of the year
his Street crew is spread its thinnest because of winter
clean-up, etc.
3 . ADD SIGNALS AND/OR FOUR-WAY STOP SIGNS TO PACE THE TRAFFIC
Ken Ashfeld, our City Engineer, has noted that neither
he nor Mn/DOT would consider a four-way stop along Highway
i01 . He further noted that the key to light timing coordi-
nation, pacing traffic, and optimum cycle timing is consistant
and adequate spacing from 1/4 mile to 1/3 mile apart.
Additional traffic signals at this time located at Fuller
would simply duplicate the traffic stacking problems that
now occur at Lewis because there would be three sets of
traffic lights all one block apart.
4. WE NEED TEMPORARY ADJUSTMENTS MADE FOR IMMEDIATE RESOLUTIONS
There are a number of things that can be done immediately
that have been mentioned in 1 through 3 above. Council
can increase traffic enforcement by shifting Police priorities,
� l
y
Council can work with Shakopee Public Utilities and Mn/DCT
to improve signal maintenance, Council can institute twice
a year pedestrian crosswalk painting on the three major
intersections downtown possibily adding stop bars at each
crosswalk, Council can insure that the signing that instructs
pedestrians to use the pedestrian activated buttons is
in good order and that the community is informed about
the need to use the pedestrian activated buttons which
provides sufficient time for a slow moving pedestrian to
cross the street, Council can join with the petitioners
in formally requesting that the Highway Patrol provide
more traffic enforcement inside the Shakopee corporate
limits along Highway 101 and 169 , and Council can investigate
lowering Dial-A-Ride return trip costs for senior citizens
who make arrangements 24 hours in advance.
5 . THE BIGGER PLANS OF RE-ROUTING
The senior citizens and their spokesperson feel that the
t pedestrian overpass or underpass that accompany the re-routing
plans for Highway 101 might not be particularly useful
if people do not use them. They are concerned that large
expenditures would be made for facilities that simply will
not be used. This is something that the City will have
to carefully analyze as. its proceeds with its long range
plans to re-route Highway 101 traffic and permanently solve
the pedestrian crossing issue.
6 . ESCROWED MONEY FOR A WALK BRIDGE FOR SENIOR CITIZENS THAT
COULD BE USED IN A WAY THAT COULD BENEFIT EVERYONE IN A
MORE CONSERVATIVE AND BENEFICIAL WAY
This particular item relates to item No. 5 above. In addition
to the temporary adjustments listed under No. 4 above the
City Council could discuss with seniors any ideas they
have to better use the high-rise tax increment escrowed
originally for the walkway bridge.
Summary and Recommendation
The Council will want to discuss these items with the senior
citizen representatives and others either at the Council meeting
or at a separately held meeting. A number of the items discussed
above are a result of a meeting that I had with Lynda Valencour
and two residents from the Highrise on Tuesday, April 1 , 1986 .
At that time the four of us walked across Highway 101 at the
intersection of Lewis Street using the pedestrian activated
"walk/don' t walk" signal. The pedestrian activated signal cycle
was sufficient for all four of us to cross the street comfortably.
The "walk/don' t walk" cycle does not provide a "walk" signal
when the lights are activated by an automobile. This cycle
is too short for a pedestrian to cross the street safety. The
problem is that people need to understand that the "don' t walk"
light means that pedestrians should not step off the curb when
the cycle is activated by a vehicle. While this one concern
has probably been resolved, all of the other concerns listed
above still need to be addressed.
I recommend that we actively follow up on the items listed under
No. 4 above and that staff be instructed to report back to City
Council on the progress being made on these items within 30
days.
Action Requested
Direct the appropriate City officials to take action to provide
temporary safety improvements for pedestrians crossing Highway
101 as outlined in No. 4 in John Anderson' s memo of April 11 ,
1986 and that a follow up be provided to Council within 30 days.
JKA/jms
MARCH 29, 1986 z - "
RE: FIRST AVENUE, (HIGHWAY #101 AND HIGHWAY #169) CROSSINGS AND INTERSECTIONS
IN SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
ENCLOSED YOU WILL FIND;
1. LETTER ADDRESSING PROBLEMS OF CROSSINGS AND INTERSECTIONS, WITH RESOLUTIONS
C.- PETITIONS LETTER
3. . SIGNATURES OF CITIZENS AND BUSINESSES OF SHAKOPEE
4. LETTER OF COMPLAINT BY VISITING DRIVER
' J• L+"LER OF PETITION IVIAD , J UlYL �,' y
1 1 0?
6. SIGNATURES TO PETITION OF JUNE 15, 1985
CC:
JOHN ANDERSON, SHAKOPEE CITY ADMINISTRATOR -
SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS PAPER
KSMM RADIO STATION OF SHAKOPEE
MAYOR GEHRGE LATIMERE
GOVERNOR RUDY PERPICH
CHUCK DIMLER, STATE REPRESENATIVE DISTRICT 36A
COMMISSIONER CHEETAH, PUBLIC SAFETY
COL. ROGER LEDDING, STATE HIGHWAY PATROL DIVISION
CONGRSSMAN, BILL FRENZEL
COMMISSIONER BRAUN, MN. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
SKIP HUMPHREY, LT. GOVERNOR
MARCH 29, 1986
DEAR Cohn
WE, THE CITIZENS, BUSINESS OWNERS/OPERATORS, AND BUSINESS EMPLOYEES OF SHAx-
OPEE, MINNESOTA ARE TRYING TO REACH AS MANY SOURCES OF THE GOVERNMENT AS POS-
SIBLE TO ENLIGHTEN THEM TO THE PROBLEMS AND NEEDS OF OUR FIRST AVENUE CROSS-
INGS. FIRST AVENUE IS ALSO KNOWN AS, HIGHWAYS #101 AND #169, AND SHAKOPEE
DOWN TOWN AREA.
THIS IS A COMPLAINT FOR SHAKOPEE AS A WHOLE. WE ARE IN DANGER OF OUR LIVES
WHEN WE ARE FACED TO CROSS THESE INTERSECTIONS IN A VEHICLE OR AS A PEDES-
TRIAN.
OUR SAFEST CROSSING HAS HAD TWO PEDESTRIAN INJURED WHILE TRYING TO CROSS THIS
INTERSECTION, AND NlEROUS VEHICLE: MISHAPS, IN THIS PAST YEAR. WE HAVE OUR
STORES AND BUSINESSES THAT ARE EXPERIENCING A LARGE SHORTAGE OF CUSTOMERS DUE
TO TRAFFIC CONGESTIOIT, THERE IS SO LITTLE, IF ANY TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENTS,
OTTR FEW SIGNAL LIGHTS WE DO HAVE ARE VERY POORLY MAINTAINED, OITR CROSS WALKS
ARE NOT PAINTED WELL ENOUGH. IT TAKES PEDESTRIANS UP TO ONE HALF HOUR TO CROSS
THE STREETS, THE INTERSECTIONS ARE ALWAYS BLOCKED, VEHICLES TURN WITH NO RE-
GARD TO PEDESTRIANS RIGHT OF WAY TO CROSS, PEDESTRIANS WILL NOT HASSLE THE
CROSSINGS TO SHOP :THE STORES ON THE OTHER SIDE, THE VEHICLES WILL NOT HASSLE
THE TRAFFIC TO PARK THEIR CARS TO DO ANY SHOPPING AS THEY MAY NOT BE ABLE TO
GET BACK OUT IN THE ROAD, MANY PEDESTRIANS COMMENT THAT IT IS SAFER TO "JAY
-WALK", RATHER THAT TO CROSS AT THE CROSSINGS, AND THE COMMENTS FROM OUR CITY
HALL HAVE BEEN LESS THAN SATISFYING IN HELPING US WITH RESOLVING THESE SITU-
ATIONS.
THE SENIOR CITIZENS OF THIS LOW INCOME SUBSIDIZED COMPLEX HAVE BEEN TOLD THAT
AS AN INTERIM, THEY COULD TAKE THE DIAL-A-RIDE (RIDE SHARE PROGRAM) FOR 50,4,
EACH WAY TO rET ACCROSS THE STREET, (OF WHICH THEY ONLY HAVE TO GO TO THEIR
BACK DOOR TO CROSS), AL-D THAT THERE IS NOTHING MORE THAT CAN BE DONE TO HELP
ALIVIATE THE PROBLE;S. AIdD THAT THERE WILL BE A WALK-WAY BRIDGE BUILT FOR THEM,
OF WHICH WOULD BE EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE AND UNUSED BECAUSE OF THE DISTANCE THAT
THEY WOULD HAVE TO TRAVEL FOR IT. ALSO, TRIS WOULD NOT HELP THE TRAFFIC PROB-
LEMS, AND WHEN THE IZM ARE NO MORE BUSINESSES TO GO T0, BECAUSE OF TRAFi~TIC CON-
tpi
STION, THE SENIORS WOULD NO LONGER IVSD THAT. ALL THE SENIOR CITIZENS, AS
OTHER CITIZEN WOULD LIKE IS A SAFE CROSSINGaS COULD BE MADE BFFIC LAW ENFORCE!ENT THAT ENFORCES THOSE LAWSSIGNALS THAT �'OK�NG
TH ADDED SIGNALS AND/OR FOUR-WAY STOP SIGNS, TO PAO THE TRAFFIC�E NEED
MPORARY ADJUSTMENTS MADE FOR DIATE RESOLUTIONS; NTIL THE BIGGER PLANS
RE-ROUTING GOES IN TO EFFECI. HERE IS ALSO A LARGE SUM OF MONEY THAT WAS
ACED IN ESCROW FOR A WALK BRIDGE FOR OUR SENIOR CITIZENS THAT COULD BE USED
A WAY THAT IT COULD BENEFIT EVERYONE IN A MORE CONSERVATIVE AND BENEFICIAL
Y.
PLEASE VIEW 1 - ENCLOSED PETITIONS, SIGNATURES AND LETTERS FROM MANY VARIOUS
CITIZENS AND LOCAL BUSINEFSES.
SINCERELY,
LYNDA J. VALENCOUR
APARTMENT MANAGER
200 LEVEE DRIVE APARTMENTS
TIC
MARCH ,24, 1985
ATTENTION ' STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
I
RE: HIGHWAY 101 OF SHAKOPEE, (FIRST AVENUE CROSSINGS) ,
WE ARE IN NEED OF, AND IN WANT OF THE FOLLOWING FOR A SAFER CROSSING
OF FIST AVENUE;
L,. NEW SIGNAL LIGHTS TO REPLACE THE OLD AND EXISTING.
2. A SIGNAL LIGHT EVERY TWO (2) BLOCKS FROM MARSCHALL
ROAD TO SCOTT STREET.
3• A SIGNAL ON FULLER STREET.
4. THE HIGHWAY PATROL TO STOP TAKING THEIR COFFEE AND/OR
EATING BREAKS ALL AT ONE TIME. SO THAT THEY MAY PATROL-
7 :00 A.M. TO 7:00 P.M. (WINTER) & 7 :00 A.M. TO 10 ;00 P.M.
(ALL OTHER SEASONS) .
5• CROSS WALKS PAINTED REGULARLY.
6. SIGNS STATING THAT VEHICLES STAY BEHIND. THE CROSS WALK.
7• AN APOLOGY FROM YOUR DEPARTMENT TO THE PEOPLE, THE 'CITY
OFFICIALS , AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF SHAKOPEE FOR
YOUR NEGLEGENCE OF HIGHWAY PATROLLING ON FIRST AVENUE.
- WE ARE VERY UPSET WITH THE WAY- YOU HAVE NOT HANDLED ANY OF OUR PROB
LEMS OF WHICH WE STATED IN A PETITION TO YOU BACK IN JUNE OF 1985 ,
AND OF WHICH WAS RE-COPIED AND SENT TO YOU THIS PAST WINTER.
ENCLOSED YOU WILL FIND SIGNATURES FOR THE ABOVE NEEDS , (OF WHICH
WE EXPECT AN IMMEDIATE RESPONCE) , AND ANOTHER COPY OF THE LETTER.
SENT LAST JUNE, WITH SIGNATURES .
SIGNATURES ATTACHED
v
200 LEVEE DRIVE APARTMENTS
6� 6
I
C I RE: PETITION TO FIRST AVE
_ NUE ChOESING CF c�AAKOPEE, MN.
SIGNATURES;
C
ly t
the1
t
I
--T-1 f
ti
I �
f I i I
i
I
i
v
i
i ! i
' � � j i' 1 � , jM � •� I I � 1 I j
March 24th , 1986
Tim Melchior
3285 149th St . W.
Rosemount , Mn.
(612)423-5918
Dear Linda,
It disturbed me very much to hear about the injury to one
of the senior - citizens living in the apartment complex you
manage. I watched the report of the accident on the news,
with my family , and thought of all the times we joked about
how fast the stop light changed from green to red when we
used that intersection to cross highway 169 in our car .
Believe me we wont joke about it any more ! My mother is a
resident of your building and when we have finished visiting
her , we must use that intersection to return home. I state
this only to show that our experience with the stop light at
that intersection is more than just casual .
I would like to share a couple of experiences with you that
have happened within the last three weeks. My son and I left -----
my mother 's to take him to a hockey game at the Shakopee
arena. There was one car ahead of us waiting at the stop
light to cross the highway. When the light changed from red
to green the car in front started to cross, before I could
start to follow it the light had changed to amber . There was
not even time for two cars to make it through the
intersection on one green light . The next week , as we were to
leave from our visit , I had commented to my wife about how
fast the light had changed the last time my son and I used
the intersection. She said the light was always quick to
change but she didn' t think it was that quick . We were to
make a left turn and go east on 169 toward Burnsville, and rriy
wife said she would watch the light while I made the turn to
see how quickly it changed this time. We were only half way
through the intersection when the light had already turned to
amber . There is no way that a pedestrian, young or old ,
could cross that busy intersection in the time allowed by
that traffic light.
I understand that you are trying to at least get the change
intervals lengthened to a reasonable amount of time to cross
the intersection safely. This seems like a very simple task ,
but I understand there is some resistance to complete the
job. I don't understand this, which brings me to why I wrote
this letter . Would you relate my experiences in this letter
to which ever bureaucratic agency is needed to accomplish
your task of improving the safety of that intersection. If I
can help in any other way please call .
Sincerely,
zo J(�ecJs Paper ✓ *a�.,.��, �t
- � f �Clac�
our^,
200 LEVEE DRIVE
SMAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 96378
TO WHOM IT CONCERNS,
RE FIRST AVENUE; CROSSINGS, SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
ON BEHALF OF THE .PEDESTRIANS HAVING TO CROSS FIRST AVENUE, THE FOLLOWING COM-
PLAINTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND/OR ARE A READ CONCERN;
THE TRAFFIC Etij3', AND WE BOUND VE NO INTEREST IN THE SPEED LIMIT OF
30 MILES AN HOUR, WHICH IS POSTED ALONJ FIRST AVENUE .
_7
2. . THE TRAFFIC EAST AND WEST BOUND, CONSTANTLY RUN THE RED LIGHTS
3. THE TRAFFIC IN ALL DIRECTIONS WILD NOT.PAY ATTENTION TO THE WALK SIGNS
4 THE LIGHTS DO NOT STAY GREEN LONG iNOUGH TO CROSS WITH A VEHICLE, LET
A LONE A PEDESTRIAN, CROSSING NORTH ANSOUTH . .
THE SOLUTIONS TO- THESE PROBLEMS -ARE:AS FbLLOWS;
Z THE POLICE AND/OR HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT SHOULD BE ABLE TO ENFORCE TBE DRIV-
ING LAWS ON' FIRST AVENUE, THROUGH -OUT THE DAY ,
2. THE SEMIPHORES SHOULD BE SET AT A LNGER TIME SO THAT A PEDESTRIAN CAN
CROSS, WALKING NORMALLY, BEFORE THE LIGHT TURNS RED
3. THERE WAS A CROSS-WAY PROMISSED TOyaBE BUIL' FOR THE SENIOR CITIZENS, WHEN
THE SENIOR CITIZEN HIGH-RISE WAS BUILT,_ITHAT COULD BE BUILT
THESE ARE REAL CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS, iLONG WITH FAIRLY EASY SOLUTIONS, AND WE
EXPECT THAT THEY BE DEALT WITH L MEDIATE$Y.
f SINCERELY, 'y
(SIGNATURES ATTACHED) t
't
1
•� • 01 m NMI'
1-! • Y'1 71 �• YS t
• i • Iva •• •
� .1 • it / • •� � •' f
Fr -IV
SUN.. ._ _
Mal l
mg _-. .. •
WIN .-
s .
t
200 LEVEE DRIVE
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 63378
SIGNATURES CONTIM-ED:
a
k
is
s:
� s
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
INCORPORATED 1870
129 EAST FIRST AVENUE, SHAKOPEE. MINNESOTA 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650 : j-
t
October 15 , 1935
Ms. LaVina Busacker
Shakovee Senior Citizens Director
RR 2 , Box 243D
Jordan, MN 55352
Dear Ms. Busacker:
Attached is a letter the City received from Charles Hudrlik
of District 5 of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) .
You can see that they did investigate our complaint about the walk
lights and made some minor changes.
If you have any questions please call me.
Sincerely,
John K. Anderson
City Administrator
JKA/jms
enclosure
The Heart of Progress Valley