HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/04/1986 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items
DATE: February 27, 1986
1. The liability insurance policy for the Ice Arena is now
on file with the City and has been approved by the City
Attorney. As the City was advised last November, there
is no fire insurance because of the higher cost.
2. Attached is a legislative update from the Association of
Metropolitan Municipalities. Please note that item No. 4
addresses Fiscal Disparities, and that the AMM feels there
will be no changes to Fiscal Disparities law this year.
3 . Attached is the Ehlers and Associates, Inc. newsletter.
4. It appears that Bloomington will not receive an exempt
from the Fiscal Disparities pool. Rather, the Legislature
is investigating creating a metropolitan-wide development
pool by skimming off part of the Fiscal Disparities pool.
The money would be used for major development projects
and in particular highway projects. If this legislation
proceeds then a generic pool would be created which all
cities could use. Undoubtedly, Bloomington will receive
the highest priority so that they can get the highway funds
they need. Shakopee could possibly benefit from this legis-
lation because of our highway needs and the high priority
Mn/DOT has given them. I will have more information about
this at the Tuesday Council meeting.
5. Attached is an update from LeRoy Houser regarding the location
of the Chamber sign welcoming tourists to Shakopee.
6. Attached are the agendas for the March 6 , 1986 meetings
of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals and Planning Commission.
7. Attached are the minutes of the February 13 , 1986 meetings
of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals and Planning Commission.
8. Attached is an article about the financing used to do downtown
redevelopment in Jackson, Minnesota.
JKA/jms
too
association of
metropolitan
municipalities
iq 005
February 25 , 1986
TO: AMM Member Cities a
FROM: AMM Staff
RE: Legislative Status and Update
1 . STATE BUDGET BALANCING:
The House of Representatives has completed the first
stage of its version of solving the Biennium Budget
Crisis . Each major Appropriation and Spending
Committees developed a bill which then was compiled
into one Mega Bill by the House Rules Committee to be
sent to the floor. The thrust of the House plan is to
decrease State Department spending and funding of
various programs .
Unlike the Governors budget recommendation which reduced
city LGA by 8. 1 percent and homestead credit by 8.8
percent for a total of about $32/million, the House bill
does not cut either of these programs. Likewise K- 12
Education is basically held harmless . The House bill
does change the LGA payment schedule so that cities will
receive one-half July 15 and one-half December 15. This
may cause some short term borrowing needs and create
future problems if additional cuts are needed towards
year end. Cuts to other programs will have an effect on
cities . About $12 million was cut from Metropolitan
Transit programs and the Vehicle Excise Tax transfer to
the Highway Fund was reversed, thus reducing the amount
of dollars available through the MSA Highway Fund
program. Finally the House bill extends the current LGA
Distribution Formula and only adds 3 percent for 1987.
The maximum increase was adjusted to 5 percent . This is
-1-
183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-5600
less than AMM and LMC Policy calls for but greater than the
Governors proposed 3 percent based on the reduced 1986
allocation.
The AMM and League of Minnesota Cities Policy concerning the
State Budget actions are identical . They call for all components
of the state budget to be cut equally without favor being granted
to one portion versus another in either cuts or restoration. We
also oppose shifting cash flow problems from the state to local
units through payment changes . The LMC has recently sent each
official a packet of information containing more detail on policy
and the effect on cities of the Governors proposals . These
documents , along with your own knowledge of effects on your city,
should be used in discussions with your legislators.
The process is far from complete. The Senate is just beginning
to structure their plan. Contact should be made with Senators to
emphasize the effects of cuts and the need to minimize as much as
possible reductions to local government . The final package will
be fashioned by a conference committee after both houses have
passed bills . Thus, contact with both Representatives and
Senators is still needed but we would urge you to concentrate on
the Senators for the next few days as the Senate begins shaping
its bill . Your immediate help is needed )
2. METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE REORGANIZATION (HF 1991 REP . STANIUS -
S.F . 1913, SEN . WEGSCHEID) :
The bill introduces new procedures for appointments to the
Metropolitan Council and extends the procedures established in
1984 for appointments to the Regional Transit Board (RTB) to both
the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) and the
Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission (MPOSC) . Generally
these procedures increase the role of metropolitan citizens
and local officials and are very similar to the appointment
process policy developed by the AMM' s Metropolitan Agencies
Committee.
The bill also establishes new requirements for waste water
treatment planning and transit planning . These requirements move
the agencies (RTB/MWCC ) from capital facilities planning into
strategic planning for services and finance; increase the
linkage between policy setting and implementation; and reduce
the council' s ability to intervene in agency operations . The
bill also requires increased met council and agency financial
planning and reporting to both the public and to the Legislature.
This new financial reporting requirement is also consistent with
the policy developed by the AMM' s Metropolitan Agencies
Committee . This bill is on general orders in the House and has
passed out of Senate Local and Urban Affairs Committee and is
scheduled for action in Senate Govermental Operations on
-2-
Wednesday, February 26 , 1986 •
UNIFORM RATE FOR MWCC WASTEWATER TREATMENT (HF 2015
3 • SEN . NOVAK
REP . BACKLUND - SF 19 3
This bill would implement the changes recommended by the MWCC' s
Rate Structure Task Force in its
allocationreport
methodd October
by the
1986 . The bill changes the cost
MWCC in charging Communities for use of the metropolitan disposal
system. There would be a single metropolitan service area
asi terra
uniform service rate applied to all communities usingto
It also authorizes the MWCC to establish of reserve
d may fundnot exceedh715
stabilize the annual rates provides for phasing
percent of the operations budget , The bill p eriod .
in the new cost allocation method over a four year p
pay an interceptors L ge under
Several communities which do not mould see a gradual phased-in
the current cost allocation system wtil
increase over each of the next several years ( 1987-1990) unThe
their rates are equal to the opthisabillae Theein bi1119s1on the
AMM neither supports or opposes
Senate Floor and is scheduled to be heard in the House Local an
Urban Affairs Committee on February 27 , 1986 .
. FISCAL DISPARITIES UPDATE;
At this time, it does not appear that any changes will be made to
tee
mit
the Fiscald two
l Disparities LawFiscal andmdiscussedeseveral
partial meetings on Fisc Representative
runs containing various ideas expressed by and
Schreiber . There was not O° Celation. thepublic
ubmeetings
Senate has not
there has not been any draft legis major
discussed Fiscal Disparities at all . itnsseems highly
thunlikely
legislation needing action this session,
that any substantive action
could
shouldoccur
this situationshortchangetime
available . We will keep you posted
DISTRIBUTION NOTE:
This Bulletin is being mailed to Mayors , Managers/Administrators ,-
and Designated Delegates.
-3-
EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
FINANCIAL SPECIALISTS
FIRST NATIONAL-SOO LINE CONCOURSE 507 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 339-8291 (AREA CODE 6121
`— VOLUME I, NUMBER 1
FILE: Financial Specialists: Ehlers and Associates, Inc.
Please distribute to governing body members
February, 1986
TAX REFORM ACT UPDATE
In December, 1985 the U.S. House of Representatives passed HR 3838, the Tax Reform Act. It
contains a number of key provisions that are difficult, if not impossible, to meet for municipal
bond issues. In addition, the Act will likely make municipal borrowing more expensive.
If enacted the Bill would:
1) Require 5% of all bond proceeds be disbursed or spent within 30 days of closing.
2) Require all proceeds for property acquisition or easement acquisition be disbursed within
30 days of closing.
3) Require all bond proceeds be disbursed within six months of closing or arbitrage rebates
must be filed with the federal government during the term of the bond issue.
4) Provide for essential and non-essential government bonds. Non-essential bonds still
finance most essential government services and would be subject to volume cap
restrictions within federal/state guidelines that would not be finalized for the next year.
5) Make bonds taxable when five percent or more of the proceeds (up to five million dollars)
is loaned to a commercial entity (non-governmental unit) or ten percent or more of the
proceeds (up to ten million dollars) is used directly or indirectly by persons other than a
government unit.
6) Make bond issues taxable for failure to comply with federal regulations retroactively to
the date of issuance.
7) Require issuers to file federal reports listing the owners of bonds and documenting
compliance with federal regulations.
This House-approved action still requires the approval of the Senate, approval by the Joint
Conference Committee and the signature of the President. However, with a January 1, 1986
effective date it is being treated as a law, and new bond issues must comply with these
provisions in order to get an unqualified legal opinion.
As you can see, the key provisions of HR 3838 are unfair and unworkable and will result in
higher issuance costs, higher interest costs and additional administrative expense to government
entities that issue bonds.
We urge each official to take a few minutes to write their federal representatives reflecting
your concern. To assist you, Ehlers and Associates, Inc., has available copies of a letter and
resolution your officials may wish to transmit.
NEWS FROM EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES
For over 31 years, Ehlers and Associates, Inc., has provided a full range of high-quality,
personalized, independent financial management services in building hundreds of better
communities. We have accomplished this with innovative preparation and skillful
implementation of realistic financial programs designed to the needs of your community. We
have had the opportunity, free from any conflicting interests, to put our integrity and
independence to work on behalf of many of you.
To ensure the continuation of this high level of independent service and personal commitment,
an Employee Stock Ownership Trust (ESOT) was established ten years ago, and made effective
December 31, 1985. Ehlers and Associates has been reorganized with the employees assuming
ownership.
Ehlers and Associates' Board of Directors and officers are Seegar Swanson Jr., Chairman of the
Board; William Fahey, Director and President; Steve Apfelbacher, Director and Senior
Vice-President-Treasurer; and Jana Ristamaki, Director and Senior Vice-President-Secretary.
Robert Ehlers, founder, will continue as an active consulting member of the Company. Also
continuing as active consulting members of our Company are Carolyn Drude, Jeanne Frederick,
Marilyn Gulke and James Thoreen. Together our account executives' tenure totals 113 years.
What does this mean for our clients? Continued personal service from your Ehlers and
Associates account executive, and the Company's continued commitment to help you make your
community a better place in which to live and work.
All of us at Ehlers and Associates, Inc., are enthused about the challenging years ahead. We
look forward to continuing to provide the same independent, personalized financial management
services that you, our clients and friends, have come to expect and deserve.
Sincerely,
EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
William E. Fahey Robert L. Ehlers
w b IO7 7 µQ Q Q Q N mQm <I Q 2 << Q << < < m m Z « mNI 2OC I
Q Q 2 6 Q
I K
Oj M O N M N K W N N N N N N^a M ri N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
o N yXI lc low mm.o .c to.oemnl mmmmmmcnmmMmmcn min ullnulvlulvlul In vl ul In vl In In In vl In In In In ul vl vl � v�i ul lai In
C T V
mo m e m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
OD m r r m m m IO r r m
mm p p8 r m r Ip m r r Ip r ^ mm �O pm pm r� m�O r r r r r�m
oD
O � 0 0 S T S P a S S a S O S 0 Oal O O �O P� rn Oai O� 0 0 0 P O rn Oai�S O H O O O�S phi a �
Y S O a O OO O IO p y�
N N N^ap N N •- N N N N ^ N N •- N _ g S pl
•` N N I I I I I 1 1 1 'I 11 I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1
_ mm mm mm mm mm N^ N mm mmN N mm mmN mm N N N NN7 N
?' �1 P m P S T O� P a
-- - - - -- - --- --- --- - -- -
JI b r Vii 10 S O N Yr=i N N O S O
x x
m O m N O b O M N N VO1 N OQ Vr=1
m IA N 10 V1 p r N In r �Q 1p R In O^ � r a M N O In m
m
N o CCo G p O C �yy
�pp m m ap O C N O yI C V
9 m 0 m C Y N > > N N w w p p Vp H
mC m w V C G N C C Q C C ~ yyy N O rn mo C O t 0 m0 p C Ol 0 C GO O C C
C a y O^ v O O pp o O N O p o o Q E N a.� C m m V c S c p
m m m m V m m m m m 611 C _
yE NyE � E c O �0 V OI� N� O VI V m C N
C
O o a oo C > J w = pOVi pp yyC Q Cj C C yy C aE C yy C yE C C N Cml m a J wEyy V O Y m J Q w -C G
o n u s u ¢ v u u a u a ¢ v <
oG C pE/ N N C r ep C O c p M U C U hGi I-Gi
m N Ol 8 dj V J 01 J V Ir C C pL c N N •G LO ip p q Q S Q
X L L FyQ pC > % U C W w X w X ; m k X X % X pFEp �0 > L X N b > X > X > % L X X X
O C IIUi 1C t- m m U Q 1�- L m �•-� Fes- K K tdl 1� C 1�- L 1�- V Y�r l:J Q LL F� O O A Q VUI N H Q � Q1�-
C
O O O. 0 0 0 O O L O O O o O O O O N O O O O O O O W O^ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0
C7 2' (J E U' U' f.� f.) U' U' W f.� U• N U' U' C� f.) f.� U' U U• f.� C� (.� t, C� (.� U' K U � U m C� (.� C� U U' (� U' U' V• C�m U' O C� m U' U' C'J m
N Ill OD N m l(1 Vt N m m Ill cD m N m Ill m Ill Ill Yl m w lA IA N w N w m N N m Ili w m m m m m m Ill Ill m m Ill W W W IA Ut Ill
D m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mp m m m m m m m m m
� m m m
O \^^ ^ ^ \^ \ \ \^ \ = \ \ \ \ ^ \ \ ^ \^ \ ^ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
^ .- ^ ^ ^^^— ....^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ —^ ^ ^^^ ^
W Y ^ N ^
_ Y �
O t�op
N LL i! b T L N a Ol L L rp ^ d C v C > > S U O Ol 01 at J c h > U m
O U J J d G O L m Y Y O Q pJ C C it i! O G1
pp •^ N c •� IO N N f.7 C7V a W y N W q .� Y U oo
U q 0 d a N « L L^ N rp L Y c u o 0 y V L L 4-Ir U C C C +p+ O•C N m y O L Y E
Y V •^•� J p C C 2 d N N
o.
C w L N v w N N pL rrpp L J N N J J N L d F��jj 88 88 U U J L p L r�pp O]N p•N L N m ^ •q VI N C C
Q = W n I-I lLL ti W O W W 3 3 L L i L 2 m U U m 0 2 of to Q m C L S K to Ilai vai Q U li L K
W
Q G m^ i Q a
LL
=< Q < <,mz = _ < < _ <
0
i x
v a v a ,o to lcm vl ul In In moo M000 '� •^ 'r '� '�'r
s $ mmmmmmmm m mm mmmm mmmm mm m
Q
= d ~CDcn N N N S M m N N q
w Ill Vl 10 ^ IO Q r m 0 IA 10 N 10 N a 10 0 0 10 m 10 M a v f11• a N N M O
H 2 K a r m m r m a m r r a m r m r r r r r a r r Ill 10 m r r a r r r r r pl r m r r Ip m m
rnm^�ammrnrnmvlrn a `llarn rn Srnrnmrn gg� S � a S�rno ScSrn S S
I-D
a a S S a a a a a a S a a S a a a o a a a a
a+ N N^ ^ ^ •- ^ N�- — N•-- '- N •-^^ N N N N N — N N �-N N N�- N N
-o
^ mm1 mmI 1 1 mmI m1 m^ �mpl mmI 1 mmI mmI pml� I
Oml Ol a T Om+ T T Ol Ol Omi Om+a P T Ol Oml Omi a T Ol Ol a co
Ol Ol Ol T m Ol Omi Ooi Ol Om+Ol
a V N O Ir
m P N O.M- m m ��N N N N N
^ m tl1
pCp N �
N m N C H p o O
o o C
c v c v mV c 2 m m Gp
C C
> c p, % m CC N •G N p Cp o L C N
N o N wyEy
.2.2
ppo E C N m N CqEp� N Cy N G mC 41 pG mC ap
N In p OOm $ m$O I C
C C C yEC
S E w m 91 E•C C Q! q! E y w G C > Ea sd OC Cy.? C 01 C G C >•J T J GI
D J J A J Otl GI L r0 O> GEl 7>1 OEl N Q < N I-+ T J E yE�j yyE
> C d w > t C y > O L > > O > L % X N C N m > C > N m C L m C
Opp j N d O d Oap N aa O O Ep Op Iq M 41 O 8 O p C o f
N K o Go N < i o S K 3 E ppG M N I..I E p S V 10 N N y N E W U G1 N Ol N
O m L N N U I-I GO U d y T 2 H D N d D
C yiy O.� L p "i rJ w OI N L N C pCp
N O S o o p G a o O O p 0 0 3. 3 2� 0 c; o 0 •E•E T wp ✓q o O o O O Ci pa$ O O O O m 0 0 0
� W C� N U• U' U C7 C� U' N (9 U' Z 2 U' U' U' U• J J W 3 3 m U' f9 C� (D U' 2 C•J C7 U' U' f9 U' U'
mm�mpmmmmODCDCD�mmmmm m mm �mm mmmmm m mm mmalom mmmm mm m
N O O O O O N N O a N N 0 0 O O a Ol �O M O O O m N m O O O O O O O N N N m
O
N
Ol Ol
w W^�p 0!gypp-
O N VI j Q CJ < U G ^ L C p n ^ Y N d d
^ N ^ •-
2j oo N y w J N
N
• L V C 8 Y ^ V C N N C d > Q 2 1 U O J V C § d N L N A > * d T
p pp s UU•• c N {r/n� 10 N 10 y Q C d' y L L N O W
V Q pp eL�pp q Lq N IO y N L r- d O L L E•� W ^ L E I W D CI C C V yp
•^ 3 9 L Vyy Vyy L g d L C L N SSC C^ yy N JJJ^p �J Y O•� J7JU ate+ Z L C U N = Ol 8G ¢6U J p L 8 L rLp N v O
IOi W < Q > li 3 � m � x 0 UUOO � O V Q ILiI � L N W OLO � O L li = OC I-I W U 7 L Iloi L i Q m rI mLLL
Q
1 � N
K
C N yX O O O O O Z^ M M M M N Vf IA Ill
p m CI W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W Wt W W W W W Wa W W Wa. Wl WNI W Wl W W W W W CO
m � M ��al m��a�Il O O NO
y a0+ r 9 N g M O OI OI M OI OI
2 KI r r IO W W r r r W W O+r r r
Ip r r W r W W W OI W Vt IO W^W W r IA
W W W WWp
W 8 O O T T S T S OW+ OM+ O OMI OWI 0
•-
O
8mm SW N N 1 1I 1 W 10IO IO .O r IA r Ip OI O
m S P P a s OI a P T m M P OW+T P P OI O� OI P P T P OW+
Nso
C O m O Ofy Q
W--� IA d O W O 6 a OD
O O M N O W N W O O
gJQI W ferry S co OI ID O N ul N-- r M—^
V N N
w v v
coo
' � WO j iA m N N
v v N N W N N
O �N $ N C I,y C C•�v N m W N N Z O 2
m
m mO>.WUppOmCyEN>vCycOlj KaC00E1l
v[G�
vCi
p w0 OC O 0ON N U C OYyl NO CV = 2 0N , Z O
mO apoOmm i_ �dO OWOyyNC
O+ L
NEE
O L O N
N L
J a a a d EE E po
C C C V E
> �0 E ad+ ad+ N d J Q J J J CC
LS �- w w y GI
O T W O r o
N L C C C X C?.L N C 2d' I OL JO m m « d O L N j d K Q 0_ N K K a' Q ~
ro c c v c R. g v
O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o d o p ap i ✓ K O O O W 0 0 0 p L
V
IO 10 IO ID ID 10 10 IO II1 IA t(t IA to IIf Yl co III ul VI In w w N w w w w w m m m I(1 o m IO m IO m
m m m co\m w m m CO CO W\W m m I m m m I m m m W\W\ m m m
W W W W W co W co co O O O O O N N N O OI O I\If IA to IO Ip IO N M 0 0 N
\ \\ ^\ \^\ \ Q M Ip N N N N N N N O O
ryl N N N N N M ^
W
Q d g
O
0 tLL In p vl N
O WW U WW N d v < Y y y O a0+ y
Z p y C O O O y�y11 '� O d L ti 3•� WY Y U U
N J J i N Y OI v 01
O N 110. C C N L N O O V r A N L L d d Y
m y L O w ,� W •� O O pJp O•L O
•U O ?` O O p 2 0 i 0~ p C Y 001 p N C O Y m 3 3 2 3 N N N d U N U•� N E U 01•� 2 �.
EE OO N V L N v J yN 3 0 0 0 Op. J L N N J NTT Yp J L ^
> 3 Z = = m m Q Q = S Q J = N N O d =
LL Q Q Q Q Z m Q m W Q Q Z Q Q Q Q Q 6 Q Q Q Z Z = Z 00 Q Q Q Q
Q 2 m W Q Q Q Q Q Q 2 6
O
> L X vevedcocvecev n� � `m' 11' I' 0 0
Q Sm� wwwmwwWWWWWWmWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWW coW W
_ .a
_ .•.• .Ol.•.^ 4•^!•'`eM`�`�`iC`�nel�`� b`b`Z'Sti nrQ -4e -- M M N
O y y M W O M^ IO r N N O OI IO IG I(i O O O M O O OI W r� IO N N N N M OI W
r Ip IO IO W W W ^� �V1 IO r r r r W IO W W r r W W W r W W r IG IO W � `�
♦+ O a O S P S O P O OI OI LI S O O OI P�_ OI O a S OM+OI S S O —T O `✓
N
I OI 1 i 1 1 01 O M, M M pI pI OI OI O O+O^ imp IO OI O
�I Q O O W O���IO��� O� ���O•I �O (M�1 ut N t��S�� �� N �� u="'�S O W N O �p���� IO (�cf(D N m
Ip N IO N Ul N M W IO � M ^ Ip
yy y
V C c c d Q $ C m w-1
c m $ m e v 0 o c I,c, Icl
oo y N N N
�p cN NL vV C `moi o Ov �yygiyLN N N NN C 1-1 NN m m Nv1 m N N fy'
N 0
O o 0 0
A 0Omm m O
y ..- ++ C Y m Y .N+ ✓ E $ Y y
C C C LL Ol N C C C M U C y c M N ry C `+ K N w H ti Q r rvCi E E r r C rOi r Q Q Q C J Q Q
I..I Noo L y r Ir O.r Q rr pp p O Ep as Q Ol N
r m N C H K Fes- H W H Fes- Fes- 10 -M Xm- O Ol Fes- 1�- 1-�• N F% Fes- p c K K I-�• H H Fes- U W H Ip-
w v Y 2 0o
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O Ox g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oi u O c�
'- O O C) J N O U' O CJ O O O U CO CO V' O C7 O O O U C� CJ U• V CO CO O O O O O V O C7 CO U' O O O CO C7 N (J O
m m m W W m W m m W W m m W W W m m m W m m m m ID m m W W W W W W OBD W W W W W W W W m m
W W W W M
mW W W m m
qlpI O pI 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ^ W W W W W W OI a W N N N (O+1 O O O
O^^ON N ^N N N^^N N^N N N^ N N N^N^ ^ N^N N^ N N^N N N N^N N ^N^N O O O O O O
G O
C �
N N
T T aT+ y v J
d mm
C 01 d T Y O O N !2 �2 v L O LL O O S W N>
� LQ 'O ��:� �_ vi a�+ ��<� LL•r� � � �_ � ��'vm rn# oar#
y p Jp T T O)> C N N r yp A N J N O Gl Ol qE C
C >
U 2j0y�yyG SI � M t Q IL�C y� J '�pp' paa Ypppp .O 1] Napp+ J J v N QI G! C C y +1
Z K 2 V 2 OE > J O m C7 S S28 K a ,, - - -1 -3 U U V S S w 109 0 J �m L = W��
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: LeRoy Houser, Building Official
RE: Shakopee/Chamber Billboard
DATE: February 28, 1986
I surveyed the DNR property along Highway #101 with a Chamber representative.
He has made the decision the location of the billboard will be on the far
west end of DNR property adjacent to Met Waste property. I am meeting
with the DNR Supervisor on 3/3/86 for more final approval.
I presume the next step is to have Jack draw up an easement in time or
perpetuity whichever they will give us.
LH:cah
TENTATIVE AGENDA
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEAL
Regular Session Shakopee, Minnesota March 6 , 1986
Chairman Czaja Presiding:
1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 p.m.
2. Approval of Agenda
3 . Approval of February 13 , 1986 minutes
4 . 7 : 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application
for a variance to increase allowable signage on canopy
for new convenience store at 1155 East 1st Ave.
Applicant: Super America
Action: Variance Resolution #445
5 . 7 : 45 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application
for a variance of 60 feet from the rear yard setback require-
ments in order to construct a strip shopping center on
Lot 1,, Century Plaza Square 3rd Addition.
Applicant: H.D. Bohlen, Inc.
Action: Variance Resolution #446
6 . Other Business
7. Adjournment
Judi Simac
City Planner
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
l.
�` gym' �3='"f „� � x �`�- �� •c � '� ''i''s_""f` �.1�,,�+`KIES
a. '`�'^•� �t �. '� � .,,._ ���",
�'.�y� � � �� "y� Trot� �-}�. � �'$�. �`•#' -i � � "$�A�x�ta a�A'� ti�'�'k�, :a��*;" s�� pk
Wo
al
T
-S T k
�'-� '��' `~ �� �'� �`�-`'��'�"��'�>,.��`; ,�, �� K-� '� �• "� ri use � „ '� �+e"- � ,�,.
r w �
', s
'AK
� � � �� � � � �•,,� x�k� � � � " ��� 'tom Ti �'�� � x ' � �
k
� r.�, ��'��� '+c.. *,Y. .�2 ��� �+:. 3� v .fit. �,'� �� �"� +• � r�
,� � � : � _ �rt '��`--sa>,,���'sz��'o.`�,� y` �a 4�� ' ��� i; a, ,x.t c` `� '�` � ���`�`1v � ix',� +' •.
On
,;,
a t �, riL§41
gV
44,
16
,r � ._ :i�:ri,,,��� *.+�:� a�zsli� �>�``„ �` �'�. y-.",�.* � � � •'"��� 'L� �i a �,� v,'��, ��, ''gin .� ��4
z£,�
r` t
XWl
PIM
a n z wZ $ a
N
AR
:i 3 - 'x`15. azr =:, •.�. - -""y <y, •gym$•Y 'i '
36
h� n
.`ice
TENTATIVE AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular Session Shakopee, Minnesota March 6 , 1986
Chairman Czaja Presiding:
1. Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M.
2. Approval of Agenda
3 . Approval of February 13 , 1986 minutes
4 . 8 : 00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: To consider a Condition-
al Use Permit Amendment of Resolution No. 440 , to allow
the assembly of fabricated metal products upon the property
located on Lot 1, Block 1, Superior Supply 1st Addition.
Applicant: Cherne Contracting Co.
Action: Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 440
5 . 8 : 15 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: To consider an application
for Preliminary and Final plat approval of Maplewood Townhomes
Addition located at 1401-1427 East 10th Avenue.
Applicant: Clete Link
Action: Recommendation to City Council
6 . Discussion: Final Plat of GardenVilla 1st Addition
Action: Recommendation to City Council
7 . Discussion: Conditional Use Permit Review - Backstretch
R.V. & campground
8 . Discussion: Intensity of Uses - CSAH 17 & 16
9 . Discussion: Land Use Plan - CSAH 17 and By-Pass
10 . Informational: a. Prahm-Coll C.U.P. annual review
b. Racetrack District Study
c.
11. Other Business
12. Adjournment
Judi Simac
City Planner
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 13, 1986
Chairman Czaja called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. with Commissioners
Lane, Pomernke, ard. Schmitt present. Commissioner Rockne arrived 7:43 p.m.
Commissioner_ VanMaldeghem was absent. Also present were Judi Simac, City
Planner and John Anderson, City Administrator.
Schmitt/Lane moved to approve the agenda as printed. Motion carried unanimously.
Schmitt moved to defer election of officers to next meeting because of lack
of majority. Motion died for lack of second.
Schmitt/Pomerenke moved that election of officers and passing of the gavel
be moved to items 7 and 8 and at that time we consider taking a temporary
adjournment until 10:00 or at the conclusion of the regular Planning Commission
meeting at which time we can reconvene for the election. Motion carried
unanimously.
Lane/Rockne moved to approve the minutes of January 9, 1986 as kept. Motion
carried unanimously, Vith John Schmitt abstaining due to absence.
There was no addition business.
Lane/Rockne moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:45 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Lane/Schmitt moved to reconvene at 12:20 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
The gavel was passed to the City Planner.
Schmitt/Rockne moved to nominate the same slate of officers as stated in
the Planning Commission election. Dave Czaja nominated for Chairman and
John Lane nominated for Vice Chairman. Motion carried unanimously.
Schmitt/Pomerenke moved to adjourn meeting at 12:23 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
Judi Simac Carol Schultz
City Planner Recording Secretary
PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 13, 1986
Chairman Czaja called the meeting to order at 7:45 p.m. with Commissioners Lane,
Pomerenke, Schmitt and Rockne. Commissioner VanMaldeghem was absent. Also
present were Judi Simac, City Planner and John Anderson, City Administrator.
Lane/Rockne moved to approve the agenda as printed. John Schmitt stated he
would like to have a staff report on the Hentges Subdivision added to 14d on
the agenda and also the resignation of Lee Stoltzman to item 14e on the agenda.
Motion carried unanimously.
Schmitt moved to have items 3 and 4 of the agenda moved to items 16 and 17.
Lane/Schmitt moved to approve the minutes of January 9, 1986. Motion carried
unanimously.
Lane/Schmitt moved to accept the 1985 Annual Report as stated and forward to
the City Council.
Ed Crozier and Tom Worthington of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service gave a
20 minute slide presentation on the Minnesota Valley Natinaal Wildlife Refuge.
A thorough update on the progress of the refuge and a discussion followed.
PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST FOR ZONING AMENDMENT AND PLAT APPROVAL BY MERIDEN CORP.
Pomerenke/Lane moved to continue the public hearing on the "Request for Zoning
Amendment and Plat Approval by Meriden Corp." Motion Carried unanimously.
The City Planner explained the background of this item and stated that the
developer had requested that this application be continued to April 3, 1986.
Schmitt/Rockne moved to continue the public hearing on April 3, 1986 and move
for its adoption. Motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GARDENVILLA 1st ADDITION
Pomerenke/Rockne moved to continue the public hearing on the Preliminary
Plat , of Gardenvilla 1st Addition. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Planner reviewed the background of this request. Staff Recommendation
is for approval subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval of a Title Opinion by the City Attorney.
2. Recording of the Declaration of Covenants conditions and Restrictions,
the By-Laws and the Articles of Incorporation.
3. Payment of $4,113.65 for Park Dedication fee prior to filing of the
plat.
4. Location of utility easements as required by Shakopee Public Utilities.
5. Dedication of Outlot D as an open space area.
6. Revision of preliminary plat showing the driveway realignment.
Shakopee Planning Commission
February 13, 1486
Page 2
Gehl Tucker, Attorney for BVC partnership requested a preliminary and final plat
approval contingent upon the conditions be satisfied in full. Commissioner
Schmitt asked what the normal format for requesting application for final plat
approval. Chairman Czaja stated that the common basis for action from this body
is that all paperwork must be in before approval.
Chairman Czaja asked if there were any other comments from the audience, and
there were none.
Pomerenke/Rockne moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
Schmitt/Pomerenke moved to recommend preliminary plat approval of Gardenvilla
1st Addition to the City Council, subject to staff recommendation conditions
with the addition of item 6-revision of preliminary plat showing the driveway
realignment and also a correction to item 1 which changes from council to
attorney. Motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDER A REZONING REQUEST OF THE ACKERBERG COMPANIES, LTD.
Pomerenke/Lane moved to open the public hearing to consider a rezoning request
of the Ackerberg Companies, Ltd. to rezone 6.5 acres of property located at
1267 Marschall Road, from B-1, Highway Business, to R-4, Multi Family Residential.
Motion carried unanimously.
City Planner, Judi Simac explained that Ackerberg Companies wish to construct a
multi-family apartment unit on land currently zoned B-l. The Council did not support
a tax increment financing project proposed by Ackerberg's which included the ac_
quisition of the Theis property and rezoning of the total parcels of land, although
the Council generally favored the concept of apartments. Without the inclusion
of the Theis property in the rezoning request, the amendment would create a "spot"
of E-4 in this vicinity. Commissioner Schmitt suggested that the applicant have
a chance to state his intentions.
Alan Ackerberg and Sandy Ackerberg of 4201 Excelsior Boulevard, Minneapolis,
explained that their intent was to build a 3-story residential apartment building
known as Country Village Apartments. They did appear here a year ago and had an
informal discussion as to the merits of the development.
Discussion continued on the spot zoning and its advantages versus disadvantages.
Commissioner Schmitt asked if the purchase of the Theis property was dependent
upon the increment financing. Sandy Ackerberg replied that it was not necessarily
contingent upon it but it would help absorb the cost up front.
Commissioner Lane stated that although he recognizes the value of having a buffer
zone between residential and commercial, he could not see rezoning the total piece
when there is still a magnitude of R-4 land that is sitting vacant within the
city limits. Chairman Czaja expressed his concern being the spot zoning and their
past record of rejections because of spot zoning.
Lane/Schmitt moved to close public hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
Shakopee Planning Commission
February 13, 1986
Page 3
Lane/Schmitt moved to recommend to City Council that the request by Ackerberg
Company Ltd. for rezoning be denied based on the findings stated in the staff
recommendation:
1. The original zoning ordinance is not in error.
2. Significant changes in community goals and policies have not
taken place.
3. Significant changes in city-wide or neighborhood development
patterns have not taken place.
4. The rezoning would not be an implementation of the Comprehensive
Plan's Growth Management Program.
Lane/Schmitt moved to amend the motion to identify that the focus of the motion
relies on the denying of spot zoning. Motion carried with Pomerenke and Rockne
opposed.
Schmitt/Pomerenke moved for a 5-minute recess. Motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITION USE PERMIT AMENDMENT OF RESOLUTION NO. 440
Rockne/Schmitt moved to open the public hearing to consider a Conditional Use
Permit Amendment of Resolution No. 440, to allow the assembly of fabricated
metal products upon the property located on Lot 1, Block 1, Superior Supply
1st Addition.
City Planner, Judi Simac, gave a background of the request by Cherne Construction
Company to do some light assembly and fabricating in the warehouse facility.
Basically the Company was concerned about going on record by being forward with
the Planning Commission and City about their intentions. The staff recommended
to approve it which would allow for exterior storage with the shop warehouse
and the fabrication.
Dave Johnson, Vice President of Cherne Construction Company, Eden Prairie, briefly
summarized what the City Planner said about having the need arise very rapidly
to have to do some assembly work, that is assemble or fabricate spool pieces
in the facility.
Commissioner Schmitt expressed concern over the noise, dust, and odor generated
by this kind of facility. Commissioner Lane said that he would like to see some
photos or slides so that he could see just what the process involves.
Schmitt/Pomerenke moved to continue this issue on March 6, 1986 at the Planning
Commission meeting.
Chairman Czaja asked if there were any other comments. There were none.
Shakopee Planning Commission
February 13, 1986
Page 4
PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A-67-UNIT MOTEL
Lane/Rockne moved to open public hearing to consider a request for a Conditional
Use Permit to construct a 67-unit (suite) motel with indoor pool which exceeds
the 'height limitation of 35 feet by 11 feet.
City Planner gave a brief description of what is involved in this project proposed
by The Suite Quarters (J.O.N. Investments). They are proposing that on each
four corners of the building they add a spire to the building which would increase
the height by 15 feet. The motel is designed to resemble the race track. The
staff recommends that the applicant reduce the height of the spires by 6 feet which
would make the overall height 40 feet.
Lane/Schmitt moved to defer until applicant has a chance to state his intentions.
Motion carried unanimously.
Bill Frodes and Loren Breggeman gave their summary of the advantages of building
a 67 unit all season motel which would cater totally to the smaller corporations
and families.
Lane/Schmitt moved to close public hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
Lane/Schmitt moved to offer a Conditional Use Permit 9444 and move for its adoption
subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall reduce the height of the architectural corner
features by 6 feet to the overall height of 40 feet.
2. Landscaping shall be provided as shown on site plan.
3. Construction of a 5 foot sidewalk along CSAR 17.
4. Exterior lighting plan to be approved by the City Planner.
5. No plantings shall be located in the right-of-way.
Commissioner Schmitt suggested amending the motion to include item # 6--Banquet
and Meeting facilities will be limited to occupants of motel because of lack of
parking spaces. Lane approved that amendment. Lane amended the motion to include
an item #7 regarding the storm sewer. Schmitt accepted the amendment as stated.
Motion carried unanimously.
Schmitt/Lane moved to direct staff to review the issue of intensity of uses and
county road 17 access and have some preliminary information available by next
meeting on March 6, 1986. Motion carried unanimously.
Shakopee Planning Commission
February 13, 1986
Page 5
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY SCOTTLAND COMPANIES
Pomerenke/Rockne moved to open public hearing on the request of a conditional
use permit approval to construct a hotel which exceeds the 25 foot maximum height
limitation and includes a Class II Restaurant (serving liquor) .
The City Planner gave a brief overview of the application. Scottland Companies
is proposing to build a hotel and restaurant on lots 1 and 2 in Canterbury
Park 2nd Addition. They will be exceeding the height limit by 14 feet to 39 feet.
Present from Scottland Company were: Bruce Malkerson, Scottland Company;
Tim Keane, Assistant Project Manager; John Gockel, Owner and construction engineer;
Stan Akwick, Hotel Restaurant Manager; Don Kerwick, Archetect; Al Gerhardt,
Maintenance Engineer; and Bill Brady, Attorney.
Bruce Malkerson gave a very thorough presentation on the proposed 3 story hotel
with restaurant drawings showing the outlay of the proposed hotel.
Commissioner Schmitt expressed concern over the number of parking spaces- available.
Bruce Malkerson assured him there would be 560 spaces which is ample p-Erking.
Lane/Schmitt moved to enter the documentation that was submitted to the Commission
by Scottland Company so that they can be kept with the file on this. The documentation
dated January 21, 1986, January 30, 1986 and February 7, 1986 being the referred
documents. Motion carried unanimously.
Schmitt/Rockne moved to close public hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
Lane/Rockne moved to offer Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 443 and move
for its adoption subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval of mechanical plans by the Fire Chief.
2. No building permit issued until the plat Canterbury Park 2nd Addition
is recorded.
3. Applicant must obtain a liquor license before occupancy of Class II
Restaurant.
4. Approval of a exterior lighting plan by City Planner prior to issuance
of a building permit.
5. Minimum building elevation at 751.0 feet.
Schmitt moved to amend the motion to include as item #6 the applicant has a
conditional use permit to build a brick and mortar facility in accordance with
the presentation made to the members of the Planning Commission on February 13, 1986.
Lane accepted this amendment as stated.
Rockne moved to amend the motion to have #4 read . . ."exterior lighting. . ."
Lane accepted this amendment as stated. Motion carried unanimously.
Lane/Schmitt moved to take a 5-minute recess. Motion carried unanimously.
Shakopee Planning Commission
February 13, 1986
Page 6
INFORMATIONAL - RACETRACK STUDY NEEDS STATEMENT
The City Planner gave a brief overview of the Racetrack Land Use Study. It has
a list of basic plan objectives and a list of compatible uses and as of late
Tuesday night the sub-committee working with the consultant did approve the
plan ob.ectives and also the list of compatible uses. The Committee will meet
again on March 8th. On March 17th the plan will be prepared and there will be
a meeting at City Hall with the land owners to explain the plan. March 20th is
the date set for the 11oint meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council.
INFORMATIONAL - CUL DE SAC REGULATIONS
There was no discussion.
INFORMATIONAL - PLANNING SEMINARS
The City Planner asked if there was anyone planning on going to either of these
seminars. There is no one planning on going. Chairman Czaja asked if there
was any way of getting a tape of one of these seminars.
INFORMATIONAL - HENTGES SUBDIVISION
Commissioner Schmitt asked the City Planner if she had found anything out on
the sale of that property. Comm. Schmitt then replied that he would pursue it
further to see what he could find out.
INFORMATIONAL - LEE STOLTZMAN RESIGNATION
Chairman Czaja stated that he had received a letter of resignation by Lee Stoltzman
from the Planning Commission. They will be advertising for openings for this
position.
Schmitt/Lane moved to direct staff to write a letter of appreciation—Motion
carried unanimously.
OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business.
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
The gavel was passed to'Judi Simac to open nominations for Chairman.
Schmitt/Rockne moved to nominate Dave Czaja for Chairman.
Pomerenke/Schmitt moved to close nominations for Chairman. Motion carried unanimously.
Schmitt moved for a unanimous ballot and Rockne supported it.
Gavel was passed back to Chairman Czaja.
Shakopee Planning Commission
February 13, 1986
Page 7
Chairman Czaja opened for nominations for vice chairman.
Pomerenke/Schmitt moved to nominate John Lane for vice chairman. Motion carried
with John Lane abataining.
Schmitt/Rockne moved to close Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried
unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 12:20 p.m.
Judi Simac Carol Schultz
City Planner Recording Secretary
D
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS JANUARY, 1986
imminent and asked Mn/DOT to help us by
planning for the Mn/DOT participation in
their budget.
Special assessments were also anticipated
IF •„f e4 since the council made it very clear that the
property owners should pay a portion of the
cost of the proposed improvements which
would benefit their property. The city was
also a major property owner in the down-
town area and plans for the public share of
the special assessments had to be made.
A general philosophy of improvement
from the economic development point of
view was that, if the streets, sewers, etc.
=T— were taken care of, then the private im-
provements would follow.
This theory alone could not be used to
assure the successful implementation of a
- tax increment plan. However, with private
a
knowledge of plans for development, it was
feasible to identify the entire downtown as
a redevelopment district and use the tax in-
crement revenue as a source of funding.
Jackson, Minnesota So there it was, the skeleton of the finan-
cial plan that proved to work for the City
of Jackson. Next we had to select a profes-
sional team that could help further define
the project, estimate its actual costs, and
communicate all the facts and proposals to
A Project from the Financial Perspective the public. This team was made up of a task
force representing every facet of the com-
When asked how to finance a major in that very year the first of two sewer col- munity; a planner, an engineering firm, a
public improvement project like the Jackson lapses occurred nearly engulfing a truck. So bond council, a financial advisor. city at-
Valley Project(the renovation of downtown now is the time to make the improvements torney, city council, and city staff.
Jackson, Minnesota),I often pause and then which we only talked about in the sixties. The project did not go without a hitch.
respond with "Do you have a spare week Now having public recognition of this sad The team had several opportunities to
to listen?" However, I can abbreviate my state of affairs we went about assessing our demonstrate its competence, imagination
explanation for this article. resources and assembling a professional and flexibility. The product is a successful
First you must understand how the pro- team. y project with sound financing and a satisfied
ject got its start. In the mid-sixties, records Years before, a storm sewer district had community.
show that the City of Jackson tried to make been established covering the entire com-
some wide ranging improvements to the munity of Jackson. Since it was the policy EDITOR'S NOTE: This article was
Prepared by David Hartley, City Ad-
downtown but failed to complete the pro- of the council to finance all storm sewer
cess. The failure was not because of the lack work via the storm sewer district this would ministrator, City of Jackson, Minnesota.
of enthusiasm but rather the lack of unified serve as a natural source of funding for Dave's background in public finance was
support for the project and no realistic storm sewer costs. paramount to the project's success. His
financing plan. From the late seventies until The city-owned electric utility would ability to explore innovative financing op-
1983 the City of Jackson completed several have to replace several distribution lines and tions in detail, allowed the community to
public improvement projects successfully street lighting devices so electric revenues establish economic guidelines and con-
and thereby established the confidence of were used to pay for electric utility related fidence early on in the project feasibilir).
the public in its ability to perform. costs. Dave has since become administrator for
Then, in 1983, the sanitary sewers were A few years prior to this project's actual the City of Ramsey, Minnesota.
televised showing the poor condition of start we suggested to the Department of
those sewers and, if that wasn't bad enough, Transportation that such a project may be �c �c
1A y....' -. �....
y
1 -1
777
league of minnesota cities
�1 Y ,l U
February 28, 1986 ."�fy {/+�_ Y,
CI (.1{ Ih..t\L
TO: Mayors, Managers, and Clerks
FROM: Donald A. Slater, Executive Director
RE: TAX INCREMENT FINANCE POT BOILS
Representative Schreiber (Chair, House Committee on Taxes) introduced a major
tax increment finance (TIF) bill, H.F. 2476, on Thursday, February 27. A
hearing on the proposed legislation is being held on Friday, February 28 with
the expectation that the Tax Increment and Fiscal Disparities Subcommittee
finishing with the legislation by mid-week (March 5) approximately. Whether the
tax increment bill might become part of a larger bill embodying several local
government oriented pieces of legislation such as the port authority bill, the
industrial development allocation bill, etc. remains a matter of speculation.
Substantively, H.F. 2476 presents cities with some very serious concerns
principally the establishment of a system of caps on the city's ability to
utilize TIF. We have prepared a brief summary of the principle features of the
bill which is presented below. It is vital that cities recognize that the
principle of limits upon local discretion in tax increment is vitally important
and that you communicate vour concerns in this field to vour members of the
Legislature.
H.F. 2467 amends numerous provisions of the TIF law. Two sections of the bill
greatly affect the ability of a city to conduct development. Section 11 of the
bill as introduced would:
(a) Place a volume cap on all cities. Cities can have ten percent of
their assessed value captured in tax increment districts. If a city
exceeds the ten percent cap, it cannot establish any new districts or
sell TIF bonds.
(b) The amount of TIF bonds that a city can have outstanding is also
limited. The amount of TIF bonds outstanding cannot exceed 7 1/3
percent of the city's assessed value. (Table I lists the cities that
are over the ten percent limit.) We do not have data regarding the
bond limit but we urge you to review your TIF debt and determine your
ratio.
I 00 university avenue east, st. paul, mit ;nesota E551 01 CB1 2) `27 00
Mayors, Managers, and Clerks
Page 2
TIF bonds outstanding are defined to be the outstanding "net financial amount"
less the amount of all money and the face value of all securities held as a
debt-service fund for repayment of the bonds. Table I lists the cities over the
ten percent assessed value limit and cities having eight percent of their value
in TIF.
TABLE I
Cities Over Ter. Percent Cities Between Eight and Ten Percent
Annandale Columbia Heights
Appleton Eder. Prairie
Benson Minneapolis
Buffalo Shakopee
Chanhassen
Cottonwood
Marshall
Princeton
Rush City
Rushford
Waconia
Section 17 would affect all districts established prior to August 1, 1979. If
the district does one of the following after April 1, 1986:
(1) Enlarges the geographic areas of the project or district.
(2) Issues bonds other than refunding bonds.
(3) Uses TIF revenues, other than bond proceeds, for a purpose other than•
- Paying outstanding bonds
- Prepaying outstanding bonds
- Paying into an escrow fund for bond payments
- Paying for cost of activities that an authority is
obligated to pay or will undertake pursuant to a
contract executed prior to April 1, 1986
- Paying for the authority's allocated administrative
costs
If a project does one of the above, these conditions of the existing law apply:
(1) A TIF plan must be completed.
(2) The project must be designated a redevelopment, housing, or economic
development district.
(3) The durational limits will apply to the district. It must be noted
that the durational limits are applied retroactively to the date the
first increment was collected. In other words, if a district
received its first increment in 19752 the district, if a
redevelopment district, would terminate in 2000 rather than 2009.
We urge you to contact your legislators and voice your concerns immediate) .
TENTATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA MARCH 4, 1986
Mayor Reinke presiding
11 Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M.
21 Liaison Reports from Councilmembers
3] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS
4] Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterick are
considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted
by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items
unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will
be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal
sequence on the agenda. )
5] Communications :
a]
b]
6] Public Hearings : None
7] Boards and Commissions: None
8] Reports from Staff: [Council will take a 10 minute break around 9 :00 PM]
a] 1986 Municipal Swimming Pool Operation
b] Street Banners
c] South Parkview Addition - Inspection Fees
d] Prahm-Coll 1st Addition - Lighting Improvements
*e] Proposed Legislation Approving Use of Optical Scan Electronic
Voting Equipment
*f] 1986 Public Works Contract - Res. No. 2529
g] Minnesota Valley Trail Cleanup
h] Policy and Program Issues Involving Shakopee Use of Tax Increment
Financing - bring item 9j from 2/25 agenda -- tabled 2/25
*i] Interfund Transfer
j ] Selection of City Hall Architect
k] Approve bills in amount of $579 , 239. 95
9] Resolutions and Ordinances :
a] Res. No. 2528 , Authorizing Mn. DOT to Act on Behalf of the City
of Shakopee for Improvements to 10th Ave from CR-17 to TH300
b] Ord. No. 189 , Amending the City Code on Gambling
c] Ord. No. 190, Amending the City Code on Masseur and Masseuce
Registration
d] Ord. No. 191 , Amending the City Code on Zoning Regulations
101 Other. Business: F�k
111 Recess for Executiv Session: Police L bor Negotiations
121 Reconvene as City Council
131 Adjourn to Thursday, March 20, 1986 at 7 : 00 P.M.
John K. Anderson, City Admr.
4 .
11 1 - 9 8 S
it's cool & it's !fury.
WATERSLIDE FEES
Q oo Ticket. . . .: 4 rides for $1.00
POOL HOURS _ �J► Session Pass. . . .. . . .aft or eve
Daily 1 :00 p.m. - 4:20 p.m. unlimited rides - $2. 50
(through 8/25/85) <
6:30 p.m. - 8:20 p.m.
POOL FEES
Daily. . .Children - $1 .00 (under age 19) Q ..•
Pool Admission Adults - $1 .25
Season Pass. . . . . . . . . . . . .Family - $29.00 �-
Individual - $17.00
I
SHAKOPEE
MUNICIPAL SWIMMING POOL
Featuring Swimming, Diving. Sunbathing 6 a Waterslide
Located in Shakopee's Lions Park (W. 11th Ave. 6 Adams St. )
For further information contact Shakopee Community Services - 445-2742
1985 MUNICIPAL SWIMMING POOL 8 WATER SLIDE
The Shakopee Municipal Swimming Pool, the fun facility that was designed with the
family in mind,was available for the 17th straight season. The pool originally
was to open June 8, but because of Water Slide Construction delays this did not
happen until June 11. The Slide became useable June 26. The Slide added a new
dimension of excitement to the pool which was enjoyed by many including users
and onlookers. Unseasonably cold weather in June and August prevented there
being a fair test as to the popularity of this new attraction. There are great
expectations for a great season in 1986.
As in all previous years, sale of season tickets and lessons were administered
through the Shakopee Community Services Office.
Employees
The Swimming Pool and Water Slide were managed by Kim Tieben and Sue Loewing.
They were assisted by seven Guards/Instructors, a Cashier, seven Aides, and six
parttime employees.
Activities
The pool was open daily for open swimming from 1:00-4:20 PM and again from 6:30-8:20
PM: June 11 - August 25, exceptions being on rainy days or times of danger from
electrical storms. Swimming instruction was offered weekdays from June 17 - August
. 9. Class options ranged from Tiny Tot to Advanced Lifesaving following the Red
Cross Curriculum. Supper time lesson hours again were a popular time slot for many.
Sun bathing was enjoyed by many. The young at heart braved the one meter and three
meter diving boards. The Water Slide added new excitement for everyone without
apparently diminishing from the tranquil feeling while using this lake type swimming
pool. A concession stand was visited by many purchasing the simple snacks for sale.
There were 30,476 people admitted into the pool during open swimming periods. The
Water Slide attracted 7,657 users.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE MUNICIPAL SWIMMING POOL/WATER SLIDE
1986 PROGRAM/PLAN
A. INTRODUCTION
The Municipal Outdoor Swimming Pool located in Lions Park first used in 1969,
has been a summer focal point for thousands of fun seeker, swimmers, and sun-
bathers. For a number of years the facility was able to meet on-site costs
from revenues generated. In the past ten years this has not happened. It
was anticipated that with the installation and operation of the Water Slide
that this deficit operation would no longer exist. This did not happen in
1985 for various reasons. It is hoped that an increase in revenue will occur
in 1986. The City has operated the pool as a major service to its constituents.
The goal has been to provide a pleasurable safe atmosphere of fun and instruction
with a minimum of subsidy.
B. BACKGROUND
1 . Weather conditions are a major factor that determines to what extent the
pool is used each summer. If the temperature soars into the 80's & 90's &
above people will flock to the pool in great numbers. If not, they won't.
The pool has been quite well used the past three seasons.
2. Economic conditions seem to provide a framework of a wait-and-see attitude
on the part of many potential pool users. There is a hesitancy to buy season
tickets if there is a possible chance that they can get by purchasing only a
few daily tickets instead. Cold weather at the beginning of a season is the
culprit that stimulates this thinking.
3. Season ticket sales have leveled off in recent years.
4. Lessons registrations also seem to have leveled off.
5. The 1986 Swimming Pool Budget is predicated upon a bare bones operation
mirrored after experiences of recent years. Emphasis on safety will remain
most important! In 1983, a $6050 deficit was budgeted with the actual
deficit being $8264. In 1984 it was budgeted at $20,650 with the actual
deficit being $17,844. The 1985 deficit is difficult to ascertain because of
the blending in of water slide capital expenses.
6. Free Season Tickets and Lesson Instructions are available to residents who
qualify for the School Free Lunch Program.
C. PROPOSED HOURS OF USAGE FOR SUMMER 1986
1. The season will begin Saturday, June 7, and conclude Sunday, August 24 -
79 days. Same number of days as in 1985.
2. Staff will meet for a few hours (paid time) prior to the start of the season
to prepare facilities and participate in staff training.
3. The total pool will be available for open swimming from 1 :00-4:20 & 6:30-8:20
weekdays and 11:00-7:00 weekends and July 4, dependent upon weather.
4. Swimming Instruction will be from June 16 - August 8 weekdays. Hours are
10: 15-12:30 and 5:30-6: 15. Lessons are in blocks of two-week periods, 45
minutes per day. They follow the Red Cross Program: Tiny Tots & Beginners
through Advanced Lifesaving. Advanced Lifesaving Course is of four weeks
duration during the first four weeks only.
5. The pool is available for organized responsible groups to reserve the pool
for private splash parties beyond regular hours. The fee for these groups
is $50 for 1' hours or $1/person, whichever sum is greater. If the water
slide is to be included, the group fee will be $100.00 or $2.00/person
whichever is greater.
D. PROPOSED PERSONNEL 1986
The staff will consist of a Manager, Assistant Manager, Cashier, 8 Guards/
Instr. , 6 Aides, and a backup crew of part—time employees. Each of these
personnel are scheduled on a regular basis as needed. All perform important
functions. They are paid only when they work.
y cn E n C') I I r cn cn r '*1 r r L7 C') (n cn ca cn I m
r'• m 9 O w 11 m m m o It (D m m C C m m m � y
n w y O rt I I w w w E m cn cn w m m w w w
T w m n (D I I w w (n m w w w w w w w w f7
m — ;U m I I O O O H O O O rt rt O o 0 7C
rt 0 (n = I I O O O O y O O O O O O rr m
V) O (n w (D 11 w n r• w (n (n y y Z y
r r• n I I y y O n I 1 1 r• r• y y y 0 (n
Cn 'b H o (D 1 I r• 9 7r z a 9 C) n n �• r• r•
o w C7 O — I I n n m m y m CL Q. 91 7' n n n b cn
.- w m w v I I ar T rt O -n < c m m 9C T T O O
Q. w n I I m m m w y r_ r rt rr m m m O r
m w I I rt rt w a O r rt o. w w rt rt rt r d
U) I I w w rr r a w w w
iI o w n
II
I I v+ _ w
I I n co �-n X>
I I O r- w 0 -,j 4-
I I nP �P nP nP �P nP �
1 1 r
I I N r•-� r W N �O
i t O N O w oo CT N v, 00
I I II II II II II II II II
y
-bq ;"7
I I J-1 (n I I v In Oo p
1 I r p I I O N to w CT a m
I I w rn C- w ON — w IO W p m
I I v, w I I O O 0 0 0 �o 0 N N O
II �
I I In r r N
I I Ln . 0 0 z
I I N N W �O r--' N O, CT W N H
v C")
Wq I I p -40
p @ nP @ nP nP nP nP nP a
O N O w 0. CT N co r
I I O N Cp N CO V)
I II II II II It II It 11 II It II II co
I 1 ts+ w r
Int.)
In w CT CT r
I I N 4 I I PQ Cn .o -j (7, 0 " w � .o w r� Z
I I � O II 000v' � `O � O v O v o CIDO CT00N PI) a,
1 I co I I CTO O CTO O` d
II p
II p
I I O. - r r r
I I
ON p p w 1
II w .O Ln � v, rnw0
ne (� ne nP nP nP �P H
N
I I II II II II II II II co
II a
-64 {g I I N N CT
I 1 CT co I I r O o CT CT N CT Z
O un k-n �D �D 4 n
I I O I I 1 "' 0o w w co O O CT CT 4 O
I I O bo I I �o `a \.c 3
I I Oc:r\ I I w O m
II �-n 4- 0
�n �D p
I I N W In N O v 3
b
11 17P nP nP �P �P �P (P
.D 10 o
Cn
� I I II II II II II II II In Z
.64 -bol. 4A, I I
1-, O, CT r I I �A N N CT N
.O v — N I I C\ — 41 I '–' O Ln �ol- CO 4-1 �_n 11 p nN l- W r N W N l.n %O CT
N co -v- 1 1 CT Co.W v N .O co O co w
II
II
v+ I I 4A tb to 40
rr •- •-� I I N '-•� .•d
r CT V N I I r N v
00 O O I I O O O O O ^0
00 co I I O O O O C» O
O o O O 1 1 O O O O O` Ln
II m
I I C7
II
II
II
It
II
II
1981 1962 1983 1984
# SEASON TICKETS SOLD
600
cd
x
E• 300
O I
on
cd
0
i
c
# LESSONS SOLD
600
ir
300
'i
a
0
$ 10000
P
1
O
e,q
cr
$ 5000
m
cd
C7
i
0
r '
7000 1
� 1 �
cr
i L7 s�
O
•rl
3500
U
r-
0 O
U $ 0
SHAKOPEE MUNICIPAL SWIMMING POOL FIVE YEAR STAFF WAGE COMPARISON
G.
T PROPOSED j
POSITION 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
1. AIDES
5 on duty at one time;
concessions,bagrooms,showers $3.00-3.40 $3.00-3.40 $3. 10-3.50 $3. 10-3.50 $3. 10-3.50
2. GUARDS/INSTRUCTORS
7 on duty at one time; 4.00-4.20 4.00-4.40 4. 15-4.55 4. 15-4. 55 4.25-4. 70
3. CASHIERS ( 1) 4.00 4.00 4. 15-4.55 4. 15-4. 55 4.25-4. 70
4. MANAGERS (2) 5.00-5.50 5.00-5. 50 5.20-5.75 5.20-5. 75 5.30-5.90
H. PROPOSED FEES
1. Classification of Admissions:
CATEGORY 1982 1983 1984 1985 PROPOSED1986
1. Family Season Ticket By 5/14: By 5/16: $29.00 $29.00 $29.00
$25.00 $28.00
Aft. 5/14: Aft. 5/16:
$32.00 $32.00
2. Individual Season Ticket $16.00 $16.00 $17.00 $17.00 $17.00
3. Guest Ticket
(7 day out of town guests:
Family 8.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Individual 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
4. Senior Citizens (age 60+) Free Free Free Free Free
5. Gate
Children (Under Age 19) .90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
(Under Age 1) Free Free Free Free Free
Adults (Age 19 & Over) 1.15 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25
C O c O O p 0 r" C)
�. n c^ -_• c- .. H t* to �- T c •• •o In In R
'b tr H 70 r; A C C r O M M y s- tT
n �, In rnc� rc M .. r •o ^e r. raa
y H C �o .-. H •o •c C7 r M (� 70 :50
•p y t-. 7. O M tin m m x
ti H r d M f 1 1 C) m p 'C P to Ln .r C
O t' A IT! to M M
? C
Ln M
PC
.� In ra z Cn M Cn
f� PC
-_� < o c �.
7 •� n C1
M (1 M ` M
N
1711 In
I'7
fn
O
N I 1 I 1 I 1 In
II P I 1 I O CI I W I N H r-
If L I I 1 0o I N r I f- co k vm O
N I - t- I t - - - -
N O I 1 I v 1 X- v' rr000 I w 1 01 W NOw y
I O I O O O O O O O O O I v 1 0 v v N 0 0 ~
II �n 1 0 1 O I O I 00 00000001 v+ I Ov� v+ v+ 00
11 1 I I 1 1 ! C
O n
N I 1 I I I 1
n
If I i t t 'd O M
11 1 0 00 ^ 0000 10 1 O p H ~ O
n O 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0I 0 1 0 p X t
11 I I 1 1 1 I M F
11 Oo t I I 1 1 OD ' 00 C P O H
y
c n
11 I 1 I I I o0 1 O 'aN 7J
II C I I I I I C I O t7 y
II O I O I I O I I O I O
It I I I I I 1
v It I I I 1
n r t I 1 1 ! I M
If - 1 I I 1 r In P
11 O I I 1 I to '
n o t I O I O
1 0 1 O O w x
II 0 1 0 1 I O j 1 0 1 p wry.
t1 1 1 I I I I
II I 1 I ! N
It 1 I I I n
11 W I I I N I N I I
1 r 0 ►- �
11 O I I 1 0 1 O 1 0 1 p O r y
N O I O I I O r O I O O x
n t I 1 1
n 1 1 1 I
1 1 �tn i
N IT I I 1 1 I 1 0% ►r O,
II O I I I 1 1 O t0*7 v+
N O 1 c,I t I !
if 0 1 1 0 1 p to y
0 1 I O I i o ; O
It
! ! I I x
u I 1 1 I <n
11
If o f i j ► f , o a,
It 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 O M 9
n 1 I 1 1 I o i o S
dv� � I f••. I I
m v+ oo �.
r l O1 0 000 v� I O � OOOyvx
1 O I
to 1
ro
i
r I I I � j a' ( ?• � w f... tom" o� aoo'
w t:; co po
n o i o i I U l "' o o P r ►-- �vvtooM
11 t t j 0 O O O I O I V+ O t-A O O x
J. RECOMMENDATION vin/ GAJ
1. Conduct an 11 week season at the Shakopee Municipal Swimming Pool the
Summer of 1986 with fees and hours as recommended by staff:
June 7 - August 24
Open Swim Hours . . . . . 1:00-4:20 & 6:30-8:20 weekdays
. . . . . 11:00-7:00 weekends & July 4
Instruction. . . . . ... . .Children $11/two weeks
Adults $14/two weeks
Gate Admissions. . . . . .Children $1 .00
Adults $1 .25
Season Tickets:
Family $29.00
Single $17.00
Guest/Family $10.00
Guest/Indiv $ 4.00
Sr. Citizen Free
Age 1 &Under Free
2. Water Slide Fees:
One day afternoon or evening Session Passes. . . .$2.50
Tickets (4 rides). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$1.00
3. Grant free season tickets and swim instruction to residents that qualify
for the School District ##720 Free Lunch Program.
4. Wages shall be: Position(s) Beginning Experienced
Aides $3. 10/hr. $3.50/hr.
Guards/Instructors 4.25/hr. 4.70/hr.
Cashier(s) 4.25/hr. 4.70/hr.
Managers 5.30/hr. 5.90/hr.
5. Group Pool Rental (12 hrs. ) : $50.00 or $1.00/person; whichever is greater.
6. Group Pool & Slide Rental (12 hrs. ) : $100.00 or $2.00/person; whichever is
greater.
7. Aggressive marketing shall take place wherever possible to encourage maximum
usage of the swimming pool complex.
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Street Banners
DATE: February 28 , 1986
Introduction
The Chamber of Commerce Retail Committee and the Chamber of
Commerce Tourism Committee have pooled their efforts in an attempt
to develop a program to provide street banners on Highway 101
in Shakopee. The plans for the banners have been drafted and
Virgil Mears has asked to appear before Council to discuss those
plans.
Plans for Street Banners
The Committees have been in contact with the Shakopee Public
Utilites (SPUC) Manager who has been working with them to iron
out the physical implementation elements of the plan. The plan
includes the following elements:
1. Install banners on the 46 poles that currently have brackets
for Christmas tree decorations.
2. Purchase banners that are two feet by four feet that will
be installed in the christmas tree brackets with modified
holders . The holders will be designed so that the banner
will be held rigid and will not flap in the wind and wrap
on the poles .
3 . Provide eight different banners that would be rotated.
Six of the banners would be paid for by our six major attrac-
tions and would advertise the attractions. The seventh
banner would be reserved for the City of Shakopee and the
eighth banner reserved for the Chamber of Commerce.
4. Each of the participating organizations would purchase
seven banners for a total cost of $600 . 00 . The banners
would carry a seven year life and be two colored. They
would be dark blue or black lettering on a bright yellow
banner. The color scheme would be consistant for all flags
and has been analyzed in detail by the Committee members
and the firm providing the banners. Lettering will be
on one side facing the on-coming traffic.
S . The banner, a sketch of which is attached, will have a
triangular flap at the bottom which will include the City
logo.
6. The Committee is proposing that the banners stay up from
May through November which will be the primary tourist
season.
7. The banners will be located on the poles in a position
that will not conflict with the brackets for the American
flags which can still be hung by City crews on holidays.
8. Individual Shakopee merchants are planning to buy banners
for themselves to use in conjunction with their business.
This will require a review of the City' s zoning requirements
relating to advertising banners.
Committee Request of City Council
The Committee is requesting several things of the City. They
are as follows:
1. Permission to install the two foot by four foot banners
on the 46 poles with existing Christmas tree decorations
for the tourist season from May through November.
2. Review of the City' s ordinances regarding banners to determine
if there is a mechanism that will allow individual merchants
to install banners under whatever appropriate regulations
the City deems necessary.
3 . That the City consider participation in the banner program
and purchase seven banners at $600. 00. The City would
have to determine precisely what it wishes to put on the
banners in two to three weeks.
Alternatives
1. Approve the Chamber Committee ' s recommendation for installation
of banners on Highway 101 poles that have Christmas tree
decoration brackets for display for the tourist season. The
City Council and Chamber of Commerce have been working
on various methods to "dress up" First Avenue and the banners
appear to be an excellent way to do that at little cost
to the City. The City, Chamber and major recreational
facilities have entered into several joint promotional
activities over the last three years with a considerable
amount of success. It would seem that this would be a
logical program for joint participation for 1986 . As long
as the Chamber identifies a committee to provide long term
coordination of the banner program the City' s role should
be limited to that of a joint participant. The City should
take steps to insure that the program does not become a
"City program" in future years.
2. The City can deny approval for the banner program. There
are two possible reasons for selecting this alternative:
( 1 ) concern that the City Public Works Department would
ultimately be responsible for installing and maintaining
the banners and ( 2 ) concern that after the initial purchase
of the banners the program would become a City program
rather than a Chamber of Commerce program with the City
required to coordinate, repair and replacement of banners
and brackets along with financing their replacement. The
City has had two experiences with this type of program.
The Christmas decoration program has been a Chamber program
that has not been delegated to the City, but the flying
of American flags along First Avenue seems to be gradually
shifting from an American Legion/VFW program to a City
program.
3 . The City can choose to purchase seven banners and participate
or forego purchasing a City banner. Over the past three
years the Chamber, major recreational facilities and City
have formed an excellent partnership in an effort to advertise
our community' s family recreational facilities. This would
be a logical program for 1986 for the City to continue
its participation in the joint advertising activities.
The City has not budgeted the $600. 00 but could allocate
that amount from General Fund Contingencies. The City
could qualify its participation by making it contingent
upon the Chamber participating in the banner program as
proposed by the Committee.
4. The City could choose not to participate in the banner
program by purchasing banners bearing the City' s name.
Recommendation
I recommend alternative No. 1 and 3 above. Jim Karkanen did
not feel his department would have a problem with the program.
The City, Chamber of Commerce and major recreational facilities
have forged an exceptional partnership over the last three years
in promoting Shakopee and the major recreational attractions
in Shakopee. This would be a low cost program for the City
and an excellent opportunity to continue that partnership.
More importantly, the City, Chamber of Commerce and downtown
merchants have been searching for ways to dress up First Avenue
and this is an excellent first step. The downtown redevelopment
plans will take time to develop and this will provide some much
needed color in the interim.
Action Requested
Pass a motion approving the Chamber of Commerce ' s program to
place banners in the existing Christmas tree decoration brackets
on light poles along First Avenue, and authorizing the appropriate
City officials to purchase seven banners at $600 . 00 that will
be City of Shakopee banners.
JKA/jms
1
" f
r
21
I oll/
r
I
Y
1
o
Of
AGO
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer
SUBJECT: South Parkview Addition ^
DATE: February 27, 1986
INTRODUCTION:
The developers for the South Parkview Addition are asking for
a reduction of charges for engineering services provided for
the subject development.
BACKGROUND:
A developer' s agreement has been executed by and between the
City of Shakopee and Cletus Link addressing Plan A (developer
financed) Capital Improvements. Provisions of that developer' s
agreement state that the City shall provide the following en-
gineering services to be payed by the developer.
Plan & specification review
Project inspection
As-build preparation
Attachment "A" is a copy of the billing submitted to the de-
veloper for services provided to date.
Mr. Link has approached the Engineering Department relative
to the magnitude of the bill and has requested a reduction of
the amount (Attachment "B" ) . Mr. Link' s contention is that
too much time was soent on the project and that the rate is
too high.
The amounts reflected in the bill are for ( 1 ) direct costs such
as testing, etc. and (2) hourly rate costs for review and in-
spection. The hourly rate cost as indicated in Attachment "C"
(excerpt from fee schedule) is a function of direct salary cost
and indirect costs.
In addressing the issue of too much time spent on the project,
I wish to avoid the precedent of developers questioning the
presence of the inspector on the project site. Each project
and conditions are different, so there is no standard. Obvi-
ously, the amount of time also depends on the contractor' s work.
On this particular project, time was spent to closely monitor
the contractor' s less than adequate workmanship as detailed
in Attachment "D". Also, a fair amount of plan review time
was spent on this particular project. In researching this matter
further, I discovered that the previous City Engineer conducted
independent drainage calculations which resulted in the elimi-
nation of portions of storm sewer as proposed in the preliminary
plat. This resulted in several thousands of dollars savings
to the developer. Although an unusual situation, that time
is reflected in the bill.
�y
South Parkview Addition
February 27, 1986
Page 2
Alternatives:
1. Do Nothing.
2. Reduce the amount of engineering costs to the South Parkview
Addition.
3. Adjust the fee schedule in conjunction with above Alternate
2.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternate 1
REQUESTED ACTION:
Offer a motion to receive and file correspondence of February
24, 1986 from Cletus Link Construction Company and review at
annual fee schedule adoptions.
KA/pmp
KOP
I1:C0FP0F.A7-7D 1870
ENGINEERING DEPAEIMEN7 +�
129 E. 1st Avenue - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650
January 3, 1986
Cletus J. Link
12831 Link Drive
Shakopee, MN 55379
RE: Engineering Services for South Parkview
Dear Mn. Link:
Enclosed is an invoice for engineering services Orovided by
the City of Shakopee to this point on the above referenced
project. Following is a detailed breakdown of incurred costs.
Month of February, 1985
Engr. Tech IV 17. 0 Hrs. @ $28. 50/Hr. _ $ 484. 50
TOTAL FOR MONTH $ 484. 50
Month of March, 1985
City Engr. 15. 0 Hrs. @ $43. 00/Hr. _ $ 645. 00
Engr. Tech IV 8. 0 Hrs. @ $28. 50/Hr. _ $ 2;_8, 00
Engr. Tech III 8. 0 Hrs. @ $25. 00/Hr. _ $ 200. 00
TOTAL FOR MONTH $1, 073. 00
Month of April , 1985
Engr. Tech IV 3. 0 Hrs. @ $28. 5O/Hr. _ $ 85. 50
TOTAL FOR MONTH $ 85. 50
Month of September, 1985
Engr. Tech IV 14. 0 Hrs. @ $28. 50/Hr. _ ;;99, 00
Engr. Tech III 6. 0 Hrs. @ X25. 00/Hr. _ $ 150. 00
Orr-ScheIen-Mayeron $ 187. 31
TOTAL FOR MONTH $ 736. 31
N N
South Parkview
January 3, 1985
Rage C
Month of October. 1585
Engr. Tech IV 31. 5 Hrs. @ $28. 50/Hr. = $ B57. 75
Engr. Tech 11 30. 0 Hrs. @ S16. 00/Hr. = $ 480. 00
Instant Testing $ 33:12. g0
TOTAL FOR MONTH $1. 710. 55
Month of November, 1585
Engr. Tech 11 4. 0 Hrs. @ $16. 00/Hr. _ $ 64. 00
TOTAL FOR MONTH $ 64. 00
TOTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES THRU 12/31/85 $4, 153.. 86
If you have any questions regarding this invoice, do not hesi-
tate to contact me.
Since-rely,
F%en Ashfe , P. E.
City Engineer
KA/Pmo
PVIEW
A r
14
J �
CLETUS J.LINK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
x14WW46h1�IkctA"3uex
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
445-2277 or 445-6262
12831 Link Dr.
•
REALITY MATERIAL BUILDING EXCAVATION
0
February 24, 1986 F ��; .
1-
1nf
129 EelsthAve . FNGr�FSygK,9�`S�
Shakopee , 1`,11,1 55379
Dear Mr. Ashfeld:
This letter is in regard to the meeting you had with 1,4r.Joseph
Notermann and myself to discuss the engineering bill dated
January 3, 1986, for services rendered to South Parkwiew Add.
We as the developers feel the bill is too costly for the work
that was done. You informed us the rates were set by a
council resolution and suggested if we wanted a reduction of
the bill we should work through your department to get on the
council meeting agenda in order to discuss the problem with
the council .
We would very much appreciate your help in getting us on
the next agenda so as to give us an opportunity to discuss
our concerns with the city council .
Sincerely,
y
Cletus J. Link
12831 Link Dr.
Shakopee , MN 55379
445-2277
A
CITY OF SHAKOPE E
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379 INVOICE
6121445-3650
To: Cletus J. Link n° 2 4 6 1
12381 Link Drive
Shakovee, Imo' 55379 Date _ Jan. 3, 19 86
Encr. Services for South Parkview 84-153.86
"Payable upon receipt of invoice"
Please return yellow copy with remittance.
Please make checks payable to City of Shakopee. 1/m 1281
-? 6-
.-.aolicatior. for Sian Permit ,
i
ermanen C . 00 +
Temporary y . 25 sM5 . 00
C' Of`_^ia1 N aws j
i
Zoning ( 22" x 34" )
2. 00 j
Special Printed Maps . -,5/sq.!
Topography Maps 50. 00 +
5 . 00/acrf
Flood Plain Maps . 00 (_r
Developers Packaae
Land Use Regulations ( Zoning) 10. 00
Subdivision Regulations 3 . 00
Sign Regulations 1. 00
Comprehensive Plan 25. 00
Recordina Fees
FEES FOR THE RECORDING OF DOCUMENTS RELATED TO
PLANNING APPLICATIONS MUST BE PAID BY THE APPLICANT.
ENGINEERING - hereby set as follows:
Department Fees (employees)
City Engineer 43 . 00/hou
lechrician IV 28.50/hou
Technician III 25. 00/hou
Technician II 16. 00/hou
Secretary 14. 00/houA
Salary multiplier 1.7600 used when an employee ' s
rate is not specified above.
Project Plans & Specifications
Charged at 90% of the fees computed according to
Curve B expressed as a percentage of construction
costs for projects of average complexity from
1972 ASCE Manual No. 45 .
Permit Review
i. Commercial 30. 00
2. Residential 15. 00
11
14
7TA10 H M eINST C' '
C = TY CD F- AKOY��
IKCORPORA7RD 1870
hGIjT==F 7NG D_F'A27 M_E1xTT
129 E. 1st Avenue - 5,%akoDee, E'Jnnesota 55375-1376 (oil) 445-3050
November 13, 1985
Cletus J. Link
128. 1 Link Drive
Shakopee, MN 55379
RE: South Parkview 1st Addition
PHASE 1
Dear Mr. Link:
Relative to the construction of the above referenced project,
several construction sequences were not followed as per aur
on-site meeting of November 61, 1985. It also appears at this
point that portions of the pro,�ect are not in conformance with
the approved plans and specifications.
Our concerns relative to sequencing are as follows.
1. "T" turn arounds were not out in and prepared prior-
to gravel base placement.
2. Subgrade cross-section and profile grade not inspected
and approved prior to placement of the gravel base place-
ment.
Our concerns relative to conformance to plans and specifica-
tions:
1. Control of subgrade cross-section and profile grade
during base placement.
2. Proper subgrade preparation in general.
Clean-up and compaction around utility structures prior
to base placement.
/ ��RH
.i
SOUTH PARKVIEW
NOVEMBER IZ, 1985
PAGE 2
In speaking with Bill Engelhardt today, he indicated that the
project has been suspended for this construction season. We
also discussed the necessity of replacing areas of faulty in-
place work.
If you have any questions, d o not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
V6,en ehf d
City Engineer
KA/prop
SPVIEW
cc : Bill Engelhardt
Frank Jedlicki
Ray Ruuska
File
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Prahm-Coll lst Addition - Lighting Improvements
DATE: February 27 , 1986
Introduction
The developers agreement for Prahm-Coll 1st Addition requires
the installation of two lights at the NE and NW corners of
the plat, or thereabouts , according to SPUC standards . The
letter of credit for these improvements expires March 25 , 1986 .
The developer has not installed the lights .
Background
During the public hearings on the platting of this property,
a neighbor to the northeast was concerned about the increased
traffic , the darkness of the area and their nearness to the
development. Because of this concern, Council required the
developer to install two lights , one at each end of the plat
abutting 4th Avenue.
Sometime this past summer two intersection lights , 30 feet
high with 200 W high pressure sodium, were installed at the
intersection of 4th Avenue and Shenandoah Drive (SW and NE
corners ) . Since the installation of the two intersection
lights, is additional lighting desireable?
Alternatives
1 . Require installation of two lights .
2 . Require installation of one light.
3 . Require no street lights .
Recommendation
Would the developer be required to install lights if the
neighbor to the east had not requested them?
If the property were platted today, would lights be required?
If the lights were installed today, would they benefit the
neighbor to the east?
I believe the answer is no to all three of the above and
therefore recommend that the two lights required in the
developers agreement be deleted.
Action Requested
Authorize proper City officials to execute an amendment to
the developers agreement which deletes requiring the installation
of two lights at the NE and NW corners of Prahm-Coll 1st Addition.
g-
Prahm-Coll Properties 2-26-86
2400-iRast 4th ave
Shakopee, 55379
Shakopee City Council
129 East First Ave
Shakopee, 55379
Mayor & Council Members
We would aske at this tirae if you would review Prahm-Coll
Properties Ibevelopers Agreement. We feel at this time that
all improvements have been made, except for one which is the
street lighting which was held over on tell Shenandoah Dr.
was complected.
Also thir is a letter of credit and conditional use
review. We would like to speek to these conditions at your
next council meeting.
tz)
IThank You, --? y 1,
.
Sean
e an c o 1 g 4ane;�
e
e
yl6,;
�N
TO: John Anderson, Judy Cox
FROM: Lou VanHout
Re: PrahmColl Add'n Lighting
DATE: 2/28/86
This memo is to confirm our discussions of yesterday about the lighting
needed for the PrahmColl Plat. Without trying to open a long discussion at
this point, I would however like to recap my views on the lighting for this
plat.
I feel that it would not be a good policy to provide public lighting for
driveways of private establishments. This does not mean that I am against the
lighting of those driveways, but such lighting should be the responsibility of
the operator of the establishment for both the initial and orn,.going cost.
Now to address the particulars of the lighting at the PrahmColl Plat:
There are now lights at the North-East corner of the plat due to the fact
that the intersection of two streets is now lighted. If a light is still
desired on the North-West corner of the lot, it would be best if it were
installed by the property owner at the driveway location a few feet back of
the property line on a short pole (to avoid any contact with our electric
wire) , and supplied with electric power form the existing parking lot light
about 40 feet away. I would estimate that a 100 watt HPS lamp would be
adequate to light the driveway near the street.
I believe this would resolve the matter to the satisfaction of all.
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Cler}l �
RE: Proposed Legislation Approving Use of Optical Scan
Electronic Voting Equipment
DATE: February 28 , 1986
Introduction
The League is urging cities interested in using the optical
scan equipment for the election this fall to contact their
legislators immediately urging their support of proposed
bills approving this equipment. This is the type of equip-
ment the county experimented with in the Special Election
last December. Mr. Hennen, County Auditor, said that he
received nothing but positive comments on the equipment.
Action Requested
Authorize and direct staff to send a letter to our legislators
supporting the optical scan electronic voting equipment.
JSC/jms
�f
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: 1986 Local No. 320 Public Works Contract
DATE: February 28 , 1986
Introduction
In late 1985 the City of Shakopee settled a two year agreement
with Teamsters Local No. 320 representing our Public Works employ-
ees. That contract covered 1985 and 1986 . The contract permitted
negotiation on certain items in 1986 which have now been resolved.
Background
The 1986 negotiations with Teamsters Local No. 320 Public Works
have focused on three issues: ( 1 ) wages, ( 2) City contribution
to employee health, life and long term disability premiums ,
and ( 3 ) the scheduling of 15-minute breaks when the crews work
10 and 12 hour days.
The attached contract provides for the settlement of these three
issues for 1986 as follows:
1. 1986 wages at 4-1/20. This is the same increase non-union
employees received.
2. An increase in the monthly employer contribution to health,
life and long-term disability premiums of $10. 00 per month.
This is the same benefit increase non-union employees received.
3 . A clarification of the City' s application of its 15-minute
break policy in its general personnel rules and regulations
that enables the Public Works Director to provide additional
15-minutes breaks for additional shifts. This will be
interpreted to provide an additional 15-minute shift for
a 10 hour day and two 15-minute breaks for a 12 hour day.
This benefit will be used primarily during the snow season.
To implement this the City will need to amend its current
` personnel policy regarding breaks.
Alternatives
1. Approve the 1986 wage and benefit changes to Local 320 ' s
two-year contract as proposed. This would allow us to
maintain consistency with non-union benefits and is within
our proposed 1986 budget.
2. Modify the proposed 1986 agreement with Local 320 . There
is perhaps only one logical area for modification and that
is our proposed expansion of our break policy to additional
shifts. Given that our crews can sometimes be working
four to six hours without an additional break( s) , this
seems like a reasonable adjustment.
3 . Reject the proposed agreement with Local 320 . The only
rationale for doing this would be to make some adjustments
to the proposed settlement in anticipation of the comparable
worth study. Council earlier in its discussions of our
1986 negotiations rejected this alternative.
Recommendation
I recommend alternative No. 1 for the reasons listed above.
Action Requested
1. Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute the
proposed appendix B for wages and benefits for Local 320
Public Works as the wage and benefit element for the second
year of the 1985-86 contract.
2. Approve Resolution No. 2529 amending the City of Shakopee ' s
Personnel Rules and Regulations clarifing Section 15 , Sub-
division 1 entitled Rest Periods.
JKA/jms
r
APPENDIX B
Salary and Benefit Schedule for Local No. 320 for 1986
1986 PAY SCHEDULE
Street Foreman $12.96 per hour
Mechanic 12.43 per hour after 36 months
11 .31 per hour after 24 months
10.18 per hour after 12 months
9 .61 per hour to start
Park Leadman 12.22 per hour
Heavy Equipment Operator 12.20 per hour after 12 months
11 .88 per hour to start
Light Equipment Operator/Parkkeeper 11 .71 per hour after 36 months
10.60 per hour after 24 months
9.48 per hour after 12 months
8.91 per hour to start
Laborer 9.60 per hour after 36 months
8.64 per hour after 24 months
7.68 per hour after 12 months
7.20 to start
In addition, all six (6) personnel with Light Equipment Operator/Parkkeeper
classifications will be paid at the Heavy Equipment Operator rate of $12.20/hr. for
the last four pay periods in 1986 in recognition of their periodic assignment to
operate such equipment during the year.
Article XIX. INSURANCE is amemded to include that the employer shall a pay maximum of
Two Hundred Fifteen dollars ($215.00) per month toward the cost of medical, life and
long—term disability insurance for the employee and his dependents for 1986 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this
day of , 1986.
FOR CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA FOR MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL NO. 320
Mayor Union Steward
City Administrator Local 320 Representative
RESOLUTION NO. 2529
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE PERSONNEL POLICY
ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 1571
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1571 was adopted by the City to provide reasonable
and clear expectation of the conditions of employment for it' s employees; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend certain sections of Resolution No. 1571
from time to time to maintain reasonable and clear conditions of employment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA, that SECTION 15, Subd. 1, REST PERIODS AND HOLIDAYS of the City of
Shakopee Personnel Policy is hereby amended to read as follows :
Every regular employee, when working under conditions where a break period
is practicable, shall be granted a 15-minute break period in each half of
the employee's shift. Employees required to work additional shifts shall be
entitled to additional 15-minute breaks. Each department head shall
schedule rest periods so as not to interfere with work requirements.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this day of , 1986 .
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1986 .
City Attorney
DEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Fulton Schleisman, Engineering Inspector,
SUBJECT: Minnesota Valley Trail Cleanup
DATE. February 27, 19SE
INTRODUCTION:
Council action is necessary to proceed with the clean-up effort
adjacent to the recently constructed State Trail.
BACKGROUND:
As detailed in an earlier memo the proposed plan to undertake
the clean-up effort is outlined as follows.
I. Define Project Limits and Prepare Work Quantities:
The snow cover has not allowed a thorough survey of
' the areas. However with the help of the Trail Manager,
Chuck Kartak, areas requiring the most work have been
identified.
I I. Secure Quotes From Contractors To Prepare Cost Estimates:
Seven construction firms were asked to provide quotes.
Five did respond with a bid ;
Beuch Excavating, Shakopee
S. M. Hent ges & Sons Excavating, Shakopee
F. F. Jedl icki Inc. , Eden Prairie
J. P. Norex Inc. , Chanhassen
Widmer Inc. , St. Bonifacius
Kusske Construction Inc. , Chaska -- No Did
Rybak Construction, Shakopee -- No Bid
The work was subdivided into nine categories of labor, equipment,
and fill material. The bid submitted by F. F. Jedlicki, Inc. was
lowest in seven of the nine categories. This firm has worked
in the City on several protects and has proved to be capable
and responsible.
! I !. Contact Property Owners For Cost Sharing :
Mn/DOT, the DNR, and Rahr Malting have been contacted
regarding Cost Sharing of the project. They have
expressed some willingness to cooperate, with the
Minnesota Valley Trail Cleanup
February 27, 1986
Page
details to be worked out when weather permits a closer
inspection of their respective properties.ies. Other
property owners will be contacted as necessary.
IV. Council Approval To Commence Work:
In order to take advantage of breaking weather conditions,
approval to commence work now would be advantageous.
Obviously, the total cast will be dependent on the
amount of trash encountered and the difficulty of
removing same.
In no case should the total amount paid to F. F. Jedl icki,
Inc. exceed $15, 000. 00, which is the statutory amount,
above which the formal competitive bidding requirements
are necessary.
ACTION REQUESTED:
A motion directing staff to undertake the clear-up of areas
adjacent to the Minnesota Valley Trail :
1. Council authorization to enter into an agreement with
F. F. Jedl icki, Inc. , Eden Prairie, MN to perform work
at unit prices per bid submitted on February 4, 1986.
The total amount paid under this agreement shall not
exceed $15, 000. 00. Cost to be paid from General Fund,
Contingency.
2. Pay landfill dumping fees as necessary at rate of
$3. 00 per cubic _yard, or $5. 00 per cubic yard for
"construct ion debris". Fees to be paid from General
Fund, Contingency.
3. Negotiate with land owners affected by the project
to obtain re-imbursement proportional anal to the work
required on their property.
Approved for Submittal
Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer
FS/pmp
TRAIL
Memo To: John K. Anderson , City Administrator
From: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
Re: Interfund Transfer
Date: February 26, 1986
Introduction & Background
Request Council approval of the transfer of $8,796.43 in residual equity
from the G.O. Judgement Bond Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund. This
is in accordance with the budget and will close the bond fund as of
December 31, 1985.
Action Reouested
Move to approve of the transfer of $8,796.43 in residual equity from the
G.O. Judgement Bond Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund.
GV:mmr
3j,
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Selection of City Hall Architect
DATE: February 28 , 1986
Introduction
The City Council has not selected a committee to screen architectural
firms submitting RFPs for the City Hall project on March 7,
1986. Council needs to determine who should be appointed to
screen the firms submitting RFPs.
Background
The City Council has been using the City Hall Siting Committee
throughout the process and has normally hired professional firms
by using a screening committee.
Alternatives
1. Appoint the City Hall Siting Committee to perform the initial
screening and interviewing of architectural firms so that
the Committee can recommend a firm to City Council. The
Council and/or the committee could decide whether or not
they wish to delegate the initial screening to staff so
that the Committee only needs to interview from three to
five firms to arrive at a final recommendation. If Council
selects the Siting Committee it should realize that a key
member of the Committee may be absent for part or all of
the screening. Council should discuss whether or not it
wants to delay the screening so that all Committee members
can participate.
2. Council can appoint some other group to provide the screening,
interviewing and recommendation to Council on the selection
of an architect for the City Hall project.
Recommendation
I recommend alternative No. 1 to maintain continuity in the
site selection process. The Council will want to determine
whether or not to delay screening and interviewing of the firms
until all committee members can be present.
Action Requested
Pass a motion authorizing the City Hall Siting Committee to
screen, interview and recommend to City Council an architectural
firm to provide siting analysis for a new City Hall.
R O O O O O R O O O O r
R V V V V V R V V V VS w
R m W Ww O R NWNIP m 4n
R O O 00 O R Zrr r f•)
R F w N N r R vvr -4 7c r)
M
O
O 'n
0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 D
N N N N N N N N N ti N
N N N N N N N N N D
D a• o a, m c,a` a` a
m m m m w m w m w v
Ot a` a, a, Dl P N CN a, M
a
at
r r r r O
,p -0 rN rr �iFN C
� Z
ra� L+'D w W �• r �. F T�I '1
W UITWJ PT W W -+W-I Ft mUI%D I+ N
0 NW OOp+ WW oo OTw o0 V♦+r0+w
V 0 o O C U 1 O O O O O r W 0 0 (n O O I J 1 W
r OwQ OF m W o0 %DO D 00 FOOD IJI
R R R R M
L L 0• N N N N
k: - O TTTTT T r - S.2 G CCC G
H C C C C G z z z n f)n t 7 t 7
a s Z Z Z Z P f-1
r poopv a yy r
r o oo � io
�tCr, 6nWM z cc
R m r O
�I H -1- C 7C 7• �
00000 a a z _
�•I �-1 -i G1 N ti m
rrrrr m o '�
X
z c�
ti
.y
m
V)•+-100 N -u rw v -0'Vmz �+
1•I%D V O 1'1 'V O •'•I 9 iH AJ r I.1 1
tm 1 cz ,1 0 000 -n m
. - mFr)zl•1 a �a m 'n TI GSC s
V) V) 1.1 N N
. t-I V)O a V) m •D N V) V)V)Z m O
T1s-Icr rl .I+ 0 r m mma m
C y• Z V) C N V) U Al N M U V)
zs T N ryIn c ccz ►I n
OOrIxC -ti V) 'T
C2mZ .T ~.T •p «r
m-Voo r m -0
• z m 0 -,
O C 0
cm o c o
mr m T z
X. o r
r. 3
z
�z
..1
N In LA
a T
1 I 1 1 1 I l l i I7
r-0 W O
I r W L4"A W tNa, C
a� r o r u In Z
O O O O O 0 0 0 O -4
1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1
p r o o V r T o Z
O %D a0 VI r NL4O O
CD J CD C,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
O o0 L^ rNNo c
sx o
N
'O 1
• N
O O
m
R al
3
m
N a
R rt 49 M
R R b m
rt m
1 m
n x
X
v\M D<)
O O O 4 G O O D R O R O R 0 0 R O O ♦ O O O rt O O O R O
LII U7 UI R CP UI U7 UI R U1 R L9 w U. ut R U�UI R Ln UI UI R W. Ui U1 R UI
V V �/ rt V V V V R V w V R �1 V R V V • V 11 V w V V V R V .= Lp
W N W • N N N N • N w r w o o rt O O w 0 0 0 w O O O R O rl P
R W w O R C.` m w UI U, R N N N R r r r w r f7
�O m m R V'� V�1 4 m w N R 0 0 R m m R -.1 V R -0 W W w o
Z �
O -t
O
0 0c 000o n o 00 c0 000 o CD CD o a
N N N NNNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N V f
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N D
m m P a, O, m O` m m m O, m m m m m ON m m m A
m m m m m m m m m m m m m co m m Op OD w m
m m P m a m m m a, m m m m m m m ON m a, m
a
s
r r O
W W U I W N r O C
2
N P m rN -0 rr CD CD W W Ln—W "I
P" N N w m m0 CA-4 W W V J J%DJ J W W WN O O W 4..'D r
O -0r N m mm \N -0 -0 �D .0 r PN -0LII OO UI UI OO d O-0 tT Ui
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
U I m m V (A r r m V N W r r r O r O O N r O F 0 O O W W O O O
O 0+co W LT %D V OO OO OD co Ln A,- 000 POU, 0 OO rr0 OO
- rt • w R R w ► - w R w
_ .. 33 rrrr r A mmCC CCC.. .. a ba' a
C-
M. as o00o a o a> m mm= s ss r
_
r-r- a) Ln C7O x -9 - mz Lz DaA_ r M f1;
a 7L 7C ►• Mr•1HA < �� Zzz. ."a
1`9 M V1 V, V,N VI D O Cp Lar1 M a C
.gym N M z .'a MMM n Oo'
V) V) O 1 1 OO _ > aD' .y z
pp 2 C AA NN a> A 2
Z2 'T .1 ON r'I R1 Z z - ab" O O
M: 'O n r) G O O_ 2 r
pp ss mrill rl -I < -C v =
-, .y ., a s • v N m m
• s z z z o
C'7 m
M M - • a - z z G
zz 2 nn r- s
r x -; r
• W L1
1•.
N
ti
m
M
-i mm x .'a x m w -V -a I'll In L'7r "1 'a
.a O O - 111 1,1 19 1,1 O C .'a LJ C O.1+ w x a G O 1
A C C Z z x z M
r9 v..-0 Ln In LH W v r y r m 1`1
s s z m ri m s m 19 r m s r9
P+ a s a V, F w D✓, N R w ou In D Ln
N ZZ Z 2 2Vf N, O z .m
N O
O O C 0 0 0 O O P N O O r 0 0 m O O O A
Vi
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 n
-0 -0 -0 -0r-0-0
W N N N IN W W N N W W N N w W W W N+N N C
W N W LD m m m W r -+r Ml F+ .D u. N r -+r w 2
O N N 0 0 0 0 N O O O N O O O O O �+O N
1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 !
W UI
Ui �+ �+r r W N r Z
N N U1 Vi Ln Ln W r UI w UI N -0 r N O
r m N
4. W N N r r V N N r .+r.+ �D .•r P
1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i
.- -0 W r r r m -0 r-0 �.W w r ►�
N N r Ln N Ln LII �.D v N r r N Z
C
r r r W
mm m m N
mo, mm W O
N N N N O
N
• N
O m
m
R m
S
Ln a
rt • 4 rt R i w 4 L 1r
r
w w a r'
k + . * w w • R m
A n n � n n � C-) 5
X x
(A N N 0 N LA r
t�4
R o R o ► o ► a • o o R O w o • O 4 o R o R r
of R UI R 1-14' R Ut R 1-14
R V,UI w 1," R UI R V1 w U: R CT• R t) W
V R V R V R V R V R V V R V R \I ► V R V R V R Z O
P w IT R N R Ln ► F R -0F R F • W R W0 W R W R r D`
O ► o R V R V R N R r r w r R W • CJI w F R N w n
P R r rt m R T • W R Ir CTI R N • bn w Ln w -0 R W w A n
H
Z "'I
O K
a
O T
O o n o O o 0 o O o 0 o a
N N N N N N N N N N Iv N H V
\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ r 2
N N N N N N fJ N N N N N D
P IT P Q+ tT tT 7C
m m m m m m m a m m m m -0
P Q, IT D, a, IT fm'1
a
s
+ 2
O V.1ONN
t N N N In W W j r v0%D ID A F V V W W ui V1
�+ D� G11 CTI O O N N O w V N N V V F F r r m m O
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
N o o m t D 0 0 p 0 0 0 o V t U I ►� � v V W C D N N V 1
P V.1
Ln In O O W W O00 O O N V1 N N O O Ln N O
- R w R • rt R ►' R • R R
S S
n a. z a T T 'M to a 71 a
z z -0 z. -1 O
V) C r -- n n N rl: p i G
O �+ 70 S O r r n O r
in z
C3 z a o
m c v c a a H r z
m
M r - M N V) H iP A
-19
n tT1 N • a �
O H r
O
H
In
-I
m
a
c v to r) -, n In v c r m m ►.
o a c IV -y o wi r
IN O "G Z a 'V V Q •r c C O r
«+ r
r. r a .. V) ti S O
r r r r r M S S D - r
f*1 A to Vl W. H N r D a — V)
h c n ri G N •. z n
O C C -1 ►�
O G H
U) v v
N O
N O O O O C O
1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n
4* C F t F F F F O
W W N W W VI N W W N N N C
ti N r 113 W r V W Cw W Z
O O o o O O O O N N o -i
1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
L. N VI CTI N N N N r O
W r N
1 1 1 t 1 11 1 I 1 I 1
r W W r .c r A -0 W W W H
F W r W N N CTI -+ N N N r z
C
V W w
m V AF O r
W N N .1 o T at O
r
-4.4 Ul N
N N P F T 1
O tF W • N
O O�
•
tD
z IP
a
r
to a
w rt • w w ► w R R • rt a r
R R • • • • w R R • rt O
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 r
n n n P1 n n n n n n n
>< 7C 7c 7c 7c 7c
7 7R X X 7C
L9 L9 L) J. V V V V 0 V V, N
o c w o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
an ui R N Ui N V1 u;ui N VY N Ui N N N Ut N vn N
V V w V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V • V R S p
0o
co w p a p m ao m p w p p m IA p co w m x w o w m c+
r R r .• r 0 c o 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 o w N + n
N F rt N r o �0 %0 qj w V 01 N F W N r w N w X n
ti
O K
• O
v T
O o a o o O a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o a
N N fJ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N D
P ul a, 01 P a, .T a, 0, a, C!, 0+ m 0) 0� 0• 7c
p a+ p p p p p p p p p co p 0: p p p m p p
P a% 0+a, 17. P 0l 0, ON 0' T a, a' T a, LT m
m
D
-•r O
v V W C
z
p p - v V W W N N o -4
rr OP 9% F F P•0. NN I•+ ww pp Pa) ry NN V V co CID .>
Ut V V I0 � NN rr VFT WNJ NN V1N �iV NN �Dp FF 00 NN p •0 r
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • s
V W W O O O O v0 I0 W d 0 0 I0 F m F F O c: N N O a 0` T O O o 0 O O P T N
w V V O o 0 o V V r N O O N (A p a 0 O o 0 o 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A-o a)
• R R w R R R R R R ► • R R R
mD to X n t 7 n t) n m
r A n m. ►+1- n«+n n C i O A ►� 7o V) «+
_ Z O n m n C y m
M O z is K K< <K < O «� G N t- ? S n
C r V, m L i n In n O a m n r C
m O -1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 z n -4 z
?I WTI TIT O A 0 ti - O - n •-1 ,Z) Z
m x -0 O In to N to N 0 > D O .4 n t T n O
a r r z z c z o z z
V) 61 In c) n
N a H 7C
A A x AX S r a) - 2 n N S
r o a a o 0 0 D C A w r X K m
"0 z p O 2 z V) n
-i m m m m m m i C n 0 T
K m m m m m m a n
►. c m
Z T 0
n N
m
n n-1 "V In N -0 0 m 'D m V) '0 O m ..
O C C A C O A i7 I.1 N C 9) -T
T T O O 1`I V Z a In -9 -9 O t'1 C O G L O f'1 C m
C C O T V) G y -0 0 'q N n -Il n PI T V) 3
Marr T "L A 'A
m m 3 V) P a w r U) —n N p• In to w O
D m r m m m m 3 m 2 N m s In
0 O n w V) V)w V)N A N a A D 1'1 A V) a V)
w .r z C C m n C C n c ti A C c n n
a m n n n 'U
O o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O V O O O a
•+ r r r r r �r r r -• �- r r r r r r r n
1 i 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 n
4-
N
N iN w N w W W N N W i..1 N W N 0' W W N C
UI N W F+ p r .G w N.+ -+ r .0 r W N r %a w z
0 0 o O r r 00 0 0 0 0 r N o N r o r N 1
0 o W F ►+ w -+r W r .+ N .c r W O r r F 2
0 0 r W N r NN N N w F to W -Q N O N r N O
N N r O
1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I f 1
W -•r W r -. F o r W o r t F
o O r N N r N NNN W r w N V N a N r N Z
C
W r
OD
Uf r p
fT �D •" N
N
O 0+
p
a a,
s
N a
w w 4 N O
w . . a m
w R ! 0
1 I 1 m
� n �
V)
A N N W
1 '
a O r
R tJ t) W
R V
Z. Ip
► O m IT
R r C7
R T A n
z -i
O K
• O
p T
v a
V,
\ m =
N D
C1, T.
\ O
co T
m
m
D
W w r r O W W C
� r
•- P '+ r m O N -1
C71 AN ID W VNON NN
V N.R T lJl 6n O r W W • •W Ui
• • • • • • • • • •
W V1 O O -0 —O N O ID V
ul 000 O -•O 9t0 V.,I tD
O TTT T T TETT a,_....
-� CCCGCCG C 77, .
a Z Z i Z Z i Z Z
In
Z
v.IT T N« *+ O S� O
wNN N.D ZP.►r D' O
O A
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 2
y-4-1 ;-1-1 " H b-.4m
a a > a a a a a z
rrrrrrrr m: x
En
A
m
a�
M
N
K
rl
Ntn•+rr2 -1O O �
-tm w W M X Qrq C -•
ozwoa .Daaa m m
Al-1 D,Yl cm to 3
3 :N m N A
•.•. A '.a Po O
r i m
.+cvvv w
a zAAn T cn n
►+OOOm C C_ A
Z C CI 2 m •-t
> m m c v to v
c. s • c n -+
m m z A .•
^. O
r z
K
O D
r n
1 t'1
.A O
w C
ID Z
f
� Z
N O
r
1
N Z
C
iL O
N
T 1
• N
C D,
•
0
S
m S
N a
M Cn G�
R D m
R n
1 m
n
v� -0
I
O O O O O O 10 In '
1^ (D
W N W W W N O C
O r\) o o o N O
• �G
1 N I-i H N N
O I't O O O O C), O 00 >
n
(D �0 O O O O O O 0 W
o
a � w N N O O\ �
FJ \n 0 .n O 0 OD W rr
00.0 0 0 0 0 v, w
\1010 O O O O ON W
tz
rr a
- n
O
�
C W 3 >
O\ h r• t-i) r. Z rl •G
• 'L7 'd in n >
R' 3 R° (D
CO r• CO r•
�0 :3- c+ -' rF
O O
O O :]
N N
C\
N N N N N N N
O O O O O O 00 n
H o w ~w rn OD z
0
B K W O r. z m
HI H• F a n z
P P. r• K K c+ & �
z O .c+ W W N
N C (D
> cN H d �
+ W
N N Cf) cn x
=J K F- 0
Qq < N
• H
n
n
W W �
\.n o vNi O 0 w
00O O O O vi W
�O 0 0 0 0 0 O\ W
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Ken Ashfel.d, City Engineer-
SUBJECT:
ngineerSUBJECT: Anticipated Position Vacancy
DATE: March 4, 198E
INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND:
The Building Department is recommending that Fulton Schlei.sman,
Engineering Inspector (Aide III ) , be appointed to fill a vacancy
in the Building Department. Since we are rapidly approaching
our busy season and there is a 3 week period until the next
Council meeting, this is a request to advertise to fill the
vacancy.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the advertising to fill the vacancy of Engineering
Inspector contingent upon the appointment of Fulton Schleisman
to the Building Department.
REQUESTED ACTION :
Move to authorize the advertising to fill the vacancy of En-
gineering Inspector.
KA/pmp
VACANCY
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Engineer
SUBJECT: 10th Avenue Federal Aid Pr•,.i e t
DATE: February E8, 1586
INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND:
Resolution No. 8528 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation
to act in behalf of the City to obtain Federal Aid Urban funds
for the 10th Avenue overlay.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Resolution 2528.
REQUESTED ACTION:
A motion to adopt Resolution ion No. `�` , A Resolution Authorizing
2528
the Minnesota Department of Transportation to Act on Behalf
of the City of Shakopee for the Improvements of 10th Avenue
(FAU 5060) from CSAH 17 to T. H. 300.
KA/pmp
RES2528
r
RESOLUTION NO. 2528
A Resolution Authorizing the Minnesota
Department. of Transportation to Act
on Behalf of the City of Shakopee for
the Improvements of 10th Avenue (FAU 5060)
From CSAH 17 to T.H . 300
Be it resolved that the Commissioner of Transportation
be and he hereby is authorised and requested to take such steps
and Perform such acts on behalf of the City of Shakopee as may
be necessary to have described properly approved by the Federal
Highway Administrator as a Federal-Aid Urban project eligible
for the expenditure of federal funds thereon and eligible for
present construction and the letting of a contract therefor.
10th Avenue (FAU 5060)
from CSAH 17 to T.H. 300
Adopted in session of the City Council
of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
19
Mayor of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1986.
City Attorney
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Ordinance No. 189
DATE: February 28 , 1986
Introduction & Background
Pursuant to Council direction on February 25 , 1986 , the City
Attorney has prepared the attached ordinance which amends
the City Code regulating gambling.
Action Requested
Offer Ordinance No. 189 , An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, Amending Shakopee City Code Chapter 10 Entitled
"Public Protection, Crimes and Offenses" by Repealing
Subdivision 2, Section 10. 61 and Enacting a New Subdivision 2
as Herein Provided and by Adopting by Reference Shakopee City
Code Chapter 1 and Section 10 . 99 , which among other things,
contain penalty provisions , and move its adoption.
JSC/jms
ORDINANCE NO. 189
Fourth aeries
An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending Shakopee City
Code Chapter 10 Entitled "Public Protection, Crimes and Offenses" by
R?peal.i_n.g -•ubdivision 2, Section 10.61 and Enacting a New Subdivision 2
as Herein Provided and by Adopting by Reference' Shakopee City Code Chapter 1
and Section 10.99, which among other things, contain penalty provisions.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECTION I: REPEAL
Shakopee City Code Section 10.61 entitled "Gambling" is hereby amended
by repealing Subdivision 2 thereof.
SECTION II: Shakopee City Code Chapter 10 is hereby amended by adding a new sub-
division 2 to Section 10. 61 entitled "Gambling" as follows:
Subd. 2. Unlawful act - It is unlawful to operate, conduct or sell gambling
unless it is lawful gambling and then only if it is operated, conducted or
sold by any fraternal, religious, veterans or other non-profit organization,
which carries on its activities in and is located and based in the City of
Shakopee. Any such organization, however, holding a state gambling license
regardless of where based or located may conduct not more than one raffle in any
given year if it is held in conjunction with a banquet and/or a dance.
SECTION III: Adopted by reference
Shakopee City Code, Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions
Applicable to the Entire City Code including Penalty for Violation" and Section 10.99
entitled "Violation a Petty Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by
reference as though repeated verbatim herein.
SECTION IV: When in force and effect
After the adoption, signing and attestation of this Ordinance it shall be
published once in the official newspaper of the City of Shakopee and shall be in
full force and effect on and after the date following such publication.
a
Adopted in session of the Shakopee City Council held this
day of 1986.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Prepared and approved as to form this
26th day of February, 1986.
City Attorney
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator 9C,
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Ordinance No. 190
DATE: February 28 , 1986
Introduction & Background
Pursuant to Council direction on February 25 , 1986 , the City
Attorney has prepared the attached ordinance which amends
the City Code requiring masseur and masseuse registration.
Action Reauested
Offer Ordinance No. 190 , An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, Amending the Shakopee City Code Chapter 6 entitled
"Other Business Regulation and Licensing" By Repealing Subd. 2
of Sec. 6. 41 and by Enacting a New Subd. 2 Sec. 6 . 41 as Herein
Contained and Adopted by Reference Shakopee City Code Chapter 1
and Sec. 6. 99 which, among other things , contain penalty
provisions, and move its adoption.
JSC/jms
ORDINANCE NO. 190
Fourth Series
An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending the Shakopee
City Code Chapter 6 entitled "Other Business Regulation and Licensing"
By Repealing Subd 2 of Sec 6.41 and by Enacting a New Subd 2 Sec 6.41
as Herein Contained and Adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code Chapter 1
and Sec 6. 99 which,among other things, contain penalty provisions.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECTION I: REPEAL
Shakopee City Code Sec 6.41 Subd 2 is hereby repealed.
SECTION II: New Subd. 2 of Sec 6.41 is hereby adopted
Subd 2 Registration required. It is unlawful for any person to practice
massage unless duly registered with the City, unless such practitioner is a nurse
licensed by the State of Minnesota.
SECTION III: Adopted by reference
Shakopee City Code, Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisons and Definitions
Applicable to the Entire City Code including Penalty for Violation" and Section 10.99
entitled "Violation a Petty Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by
reference as though repeated verbatim herein.
SECTION IV: When in Force and Effect
After the adoption, signing, and attestation of this Ordinance it shall be
published once in the official newspaper of the City of Shakopee and shall be in
full force and effect on and after the date following such publication.
Adopting in session of the Shakopee City Council held this
day of _ 1986.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Prepared and approved as to form this
26th day of February, 1986.
ty Attorn v --
ORDINANCE NO. 191 '
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11
OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY CODE, THE LAND
USE AND REGULATION (ZONING) CHAPTER
Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Shakopee as follows :
SECTION I.
That in accordance with the provisions of Section 11 .04(7) of the
Shakopee City Code the provisions of the zoning map created by Section 11.21 of
the Shakopee City Code is hereby amended to rezone from B-1 (highway business to
R-4 multi-family residential) the following described property:
The South half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 7, Township 115, Range 22, excepting therefrom the following,
to-wit:
A. The East 678.8 feet; and
B. The North 170 feet lying Westerly of the East 678.8 feet; and
C. The South 16.5 feet lying Westerly of the East 678.8 feet.
SECTION II.
This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication.
Passed in regular session of the Shakopee City Council this 4th day of
March, 1986.
Eldon Reinke, Mayor
ATTESTED TO BY:
Judith Cox, City Clerk
Prepared and approved as to form by
Krass & Monroe Chartered.
ViEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
R£: Apportionment of Assessments Among New Parcels
Within Hauer Third Addition
DATE: March 3 , 1986
Introduction and Background
As a result of the platting of Hauer Third Addition the existing
special assessments were apportioned among the new lots and
were spelled out in the developers agreement. Now that the
plat has been filed, it is appropriate to adopt the attached
resolution formally apportioning the special assessments. The
special assessments apportioned in the attached resolution are
reduced from those contained in the developers agreement by
the amount certified to the county in October, 1985 .
Alternatives
1. Don' t adopt Resolution No. 2530.
2. Do adopt Resolution No. 2530.
Action Recommended
Offer Resolution No. 2530 , A Resolution Apportioning Assessments
Among New Parcels Created as a Result of the Subdivision of
Land into Hauer Third Addition, and move its adoption.
JSC/jms
RESOLUTION NO. 2530
A RESOLUTION APPORTIONING ASSESSMENTS AMONG NEW PARCELS
CREATED AS A RESULT OF THE SUBDIVISION OF LAND
INTO HAUER THIRD ADDITION
WHEREAS, on July 22 , 1975 Resolution No. 860 adopted by
the City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted
by contruction of the 1974-1 public improvement project; and
WHEREAS, on August 11 , 1981 Resolution No. 1893 adopted
by the City Council levied against assessments against properties
benefitted by construction of the 1980-1 Hauer Lateral Sanitary
Sewer System; and
WHEREAS, on August 25 , 1981 Resolution No. 1891 adopted
by the City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted
by construction of the 1981-1 V.I.P. Sewer Interceptor Improvement
Project; and
WHEREAS, four parcels of land, known as 908-040-0 , 908-022-0,
908-004-0, and 908-069-0 which benefitted by the said improvements,
have been subdivided into the plat of Hauer Third Addition;
and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to apportion
the installments remaining unpaid against said tracts among
the new created parcels, and
WHEREAS, the property owners involved have been notified
of this proposed action.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE:
1. That the 1986 payable remaining balance of assessments
to parcels 908-040-0 are $12 , 913 . 32 for the 80-1 Hauer
Laterals and $26 , 642. 13 for 81-1 VIP Interceptor;
R, to parcel 908-022-0 are $2 , 147. 11 for the 74-1 street
improvement and $12,379.33 for the 81-1 VIP Interceptor;
to parcel 908-004-0 are $586. 82 for the 81-1 VIP
Interceptor; and to parcel 908-069-0 are $1,750. 25
for the 81-1 VIP Interceptor and all are hereby apportioned
as outlined in exhibit "A" attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
2. That all other parts of Resolution No. 860 shall continue
in effect.
3 . That all other parts of Resolution No. 1893 shall
continue in effect.
Resolution No. 2530
Page Two
4. That all other parts of Resolution No. 1891 shall
continue in effect.
Adopted in session of the City Council
of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of
1986 .
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1986 .
City Attorney
�7 N to ON O% Cl m m O\ ON O\
�O O
H
ro c^ N t` tf1 U1 to to tf1 u1 tf 1 u1 to
O 00 O O N N N N N N N N N N N
H
O
N N Lr) O` C\ a\ D\ D` O`
PW a Lr) Lr) 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
H a) Ln .
U M t\ t\ M M M M M M M M M ,• M
N�+ 00 ON 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
b D` -A .•-1 --I .-i .--I .--I
1 aJ O
•-+ G U �7
00 H
U to M Lr)
O H S I I 1 I I I I I I I
ro ro I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1
1.1 O
1.1 1 ro U .--1
coa
:j 00
o -
d�'
a) 00 o o O o 0 0 o O O O O
a) M Lr) O% ON O\ ON O1 O` O\ ON O` O` O\
�-j I
11 O M I I .-1 .-1 .-1 ..i .-i .-i .-i .--i •--1 •--i .--i
m b M I I M M M M M M M M M M M
O M
•-1 U
r`
Q
i.+
.0
W �
O b b
�4 U
� M M
11 1J 1J 1-1 .-•1 .-y .--I .-1 N N N N
*{ O 3.+ O 3 O Cq GA (Yl Cq W Rl Gtr W Cq
�+ H aI H a) H
U +) O +J O 41
E O ro O ro O -- N M �-
a
H „
ro �
M Cl) O`
a -� M a > 1=
*+ to o
4 In
w ro V Sa H �.1 1t1
C) a4 o a) =
a) � x
'LJ -H ro O H
its E c. - - - - - - - - - -
m aa) as 00 .° as ca t, x
w w > � v W > U � cq
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
t� 00 O\ -4 N M -7 to �o t" 00 ON O
O N N N O O O O O O O O O .--i •--i
Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
C1
W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
CA._
O ON ON fT 1-4
ro N
O N N N N N
H N N N N N N N N N N Lr)
>a Ic
O
4-) O� ONON ON
Aa
Q.Lr) 00 00 00 ao
H d Lr) N 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
,
�+ O 00 00 00 00 M M M M M M M M M M 00
^� O b .-i .--I ,� ,� 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0O u'1
1.4 00
-- C U
00 H
Lr)
�4 -
N (n M Lr)
•� H ul
.--1 4-) p I I I I
I I I I 1
1J I ro `J
C O a
C 00
O
A
°M° rn m 0\ ON I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o vi
�` rn 0\ C1 rn O\ ON ON o
cn b
U M M M M M M M M M
I O
r\
N
N
LA
L. —I 'O
0 H M
N N N N M M M M M U
"i CA q FA CQ FA b FA U C
U CA W q FMA CA CA w x
U1 r� CO w M .7 Lr 00
N
ro " 1J
N O
Lr) 0) ON
a a o-I Lr) H UM)
rn
O E y —q to A 0
00 N > Lz7 r.1 A �, W cCC
H d
*+ •.� - x a
to00 It
ro a00 j
O0 1� N
r-i
ro 00 Ln M
yM � M
O M -'T t�
E-+
M
O
H a) Ln t\ N
U LP tf1 M
•- a) b -::* s r`
I O
•-+ G U M .-a
00 H N
�+ Ln
O U1 M N
Ln I I
+J roro --rI I
x ab M I I
O --1 .0 O
00
4
a) 00
O M
41 a1 I 1 I
U)
0
n
Q
O
. 1
41
CL
•+i N N N
w N N N
U I i
to Ln •b tf1 b LIn
I I Y+ I M
*� 00 w00 00
ro O a) i4
U U O U d
� oro aero a� �
a v x cn x cn ro
C) o o
x c
ww ww ww *-+ c C
—1 Lr)
(t Ln
o w ro
�4 roE £
w ro Z a)
c
ro ro
In
Con00xa) a
z 00 �-4 00 CO E =
o o ,a ro ro
W 7 N DO "7 w
O O O
I I I
z o 0 0
H o0 00 00
a� o O o
W N N N