HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/19/1985 ilN
rn
cn
M � � .
LTI �
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items
DATE: November 15 , 1985
1. Judy has been informed by the Valley Ice Arena, Inc. that
it has purchased liability insurance for the period beginning
November 15 , 1985 . They will be coming back to Council
on December 3rd asking for some financial help on the premium,
at which time they will have a better handle on their expenses.
Judy was informed that they were able to purchase the insurance
for less than the amount originally estimated and that
they will be also contacting the Chaska City Council.
2. The City of Shakopee has been formally contacted by the
Municipal Legislative Commission, a sister lobbying group,
about joining that group. There annual dues are 28 cents
per capita times the 1985 Metropolitan population estimates
or approximately $3 , 035 . 48 for Shakopee. This is the group
that was an outgrowth of the Municipal Caucus that decided
to assess its members to provide for a full time lobbyist.
This group has not been able to take a position on fiscal
disparties because their membership is split. I do not
recommend we consider membership until after the 1986 legis-
lative session simply because they have not been able to
take a position on fiscal disparities, the key issue on
our agenda.
3 . The City received an assessment appeal within the 30 day
appeal period on the Shenandoah Drive public improvements
from Silverhawk, n.v. , a Netherlands Antelles Corporation.
4. Jim Karkanen informed Judy Cox that he and John Engler
from the Jaycees had talked with a couple of Jim' s employees
about fertilizing Tahpah Park on a couple of occasions.
Both the Jaycess and Public Works were unsure as to whether
or not funds would be available in their budget for fertiliz-
ing. We will let you know what the final outcome of this
issue is.
5. Attached is a thank you letter from the senior citizens
at the First National Bank for the recent help Council
provided at the pancake breakfast for seniors.
6. Attached is a notice to Judy Cox regarding a stock sale
at Clair' s Bar, Inc.
7. Attached is a project status report from Ken Ashfeld regarding
engineering projects.
8 . Attached is an informational item from Barry Stock regarding
the Scott County Transportation Steering Committee.
9. Attached is an informational item from Barry Stock regarding
planned Highway 41 improvements in 1986 .
10 . Attached is an informational update regarding the joint
compensation study status report.
11. Attached is the building activity report for the period
ending October 31 , 1985 .
12. Attached are the minutes of the October 23 , 1985 meeting
of the Downtown Ad Hoc Committee.
13 . Councilmembers may have noticed in Thursday' s Star and
Tribune that President Reagan has signed a law passed by
Congress restoring comp time for public officials. The
new law includes some restraints but restores the key elements
of comp time. This will be welcome news for city employees
and will help the city' s 1986 budget which included inflated
overtime costs because of the prior Supreme Court ruling
on comp time. We should have something before Council
at the December meeting changing our policy on comp time
back to what it was prior to the Supreme Court ruling.
14 . Attached is the Revenue and Expenditure Report as of October
31, 1985 .
15 . Attached is a letter from Sandra Gardebring, Chair, Metropolitan
Council re: Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework.
16. Attached is the November 21, 1985 agenda for the Energy
and Transportation Committee Meeting.
17. Attached are the minutes of the October 17 , 1985 meeting
of the Energy and Transportation Committee.
JKA/jms
MANAHAN, JOHNSON & TUCKERtG
MARSCHALL ROAD BUSINESS CENTER
P.O. BOX 282
327 MARSCHALL ROAD
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379
JOHN. M. MANAHAN
DIANE K. JOHNSON 445-7470
R. GEHL TUCKER October 31, 1985 Area Code 612
Ms . Judy Cox
City Clerk
City of Shakopee E ..
129 First Avenue East
Shakopee, MN 55379
RE : Sale of Stock - Clair ' s Bar , Inc .
Dear Judy:
In response to your request of October 18 , 1985 , I am informing you
that Mr . Stanley Davies and Mr . Lawrence Ricklick have acquired the
stock of Clair ' s Bar , Inc . I understand that Mr. Davies and Mr . Ricklick
have received approval from the Shakopee Police Department to acquire
the stock. It is my further understanding that everything is in order
for this transaction.
Yours very truly,
MANAHAN, JOHNSON & TUCKER
R. GEHL TUCKER
RGT:nb
File #A1782-002
No Council action is necessary. This is a transfer of
stock and per city code Council must be so notified
within 30 days after transfer.
PROJECT STATUS AS OF NOVEMBER 12, 1985
1. Shenandoah Drive 1984-4 - Project Finaled
2. Valley Park Drive/12th Avenue 1984-5 - Certificate of Completion
to Council 11/19/85.
3. 5th Avenue Sanitary Sewer 1984-6 - Semi-Final Estimate
to Council 11/19/85.
4. 101 Intersection Improvements 1984-8 - Work funished, Semi-Final
in December.
5. C. R. 83 Widening 1984-9 - Work finished, Semi-Final in
December.
6. Tahpah Sewer/Water Project - Project Finaled.
7. 4th Avenue Project 1985-1 - 1/2 of Bituminous Base installed,
hope to have remainder before December 1, 1985.
8. Eaglewood Project 1985-2 - Paving to be postponed to Spring
of 1986.
a. Deerview - not paved yet.
9. 1985 Curb, Sidewalk Program - Work finished (about $7, 500. 00
worth done) .
10. 2nd Avenue Parking Lot 1985-4 - Curb and Bituminous Base
in/most of remaining work to be done in Spring 1986.
a. Lion Park Parking Lot - Work finished.
b. Taylor Street - Curb in, bituminous base
should be done by November 20. Wear Course
and restoration to be done in Spring of
1986.
11. Della' s Addition - Work finished.
12. South Parkview Addition - Sewer & Water in. Street work
to be done in Spring of 1986.
13. Hauer' s 3rd Addition - Utility work to begin this week.
14. Canterbury Park Addition - Site grading completed, utility
work to begin this week.
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Administrative Intern
RE: Scott County Transportation Steering Committee
( Informational)
DATE: November 14 , 1985
Introduction & Background
Last month the City of Shakopee in conjunction with Scott County
and other public and private agencies in our area held host
to the Legislative Task Force on administrative efficiency.
The Task Force was primarily comprised of House Transportation
Committee members. While in Shakopee the Task Force met with
both public and private officials and conducted a public hearing
to take testimony on the actual and perceived transportation
needs for Scott County.
One week prior to the arrival of the Task Force, an informal
Steering Committee was created to investigate and develop a
common strategy for lobbying the legislators while they were
in our community. The Steering Committee was comprised of local
government officials and representatives from the private sector.
The Steering Committee was successful in developing a common
theme that was adhered to by the majority of the individuals
who provided testimony to the Legislative Task Force. The main
points of the theme that was developed by the Steering Committee
are as follows:
1. Roads have been promised in this area and priorities need
to be established.
2. Highway 169 and 101 have a state-wide impact on the following
groups: (a) farmers, (b) tourists , (c) truckers, and (d)
commuters.
3 . Highway 169 and 101 serve as major arteries from southwest
Minnesota to Twin Cities and northern Minnesota.
4. Highway improvements necessary for continued growth in
this area in the order of priority for development are
as follows: ( a) mini by-pass (downtown) , (b) 169 by-pass,
(c) County Road 18 bridge, (d) County Road 18 highway improve-
ments from Highway 101 through Hennepin County.
With so many players reiterating the same concerns, Shakopee
and Scott County' s need for highway improvements was imbedded
firmly in the minds of the legislators in attendance.
Recognizing the strength of such an approach, the Steering Committee
established last month has decided to begin meeting on a regular
basis. At some point in time, formal recognition of the Steering
Committee may be requested to add weight and credence to their
proceedings. The first meeting of the Scott County Transportation
Steering Committee will be held on Friday, November 15 , 1985 .
From this point on, staff will provide City Council Members
with a copy of the minutes of these meetings as they occur.
Important events that the Steering Committee will be working
on in the immediate future include:
1. Evaluation of the Metropolitan Council ' s policies as they
effect transportation needs in Scott County.
2. Planning a meeting with Representative Frensel later this
month to discuss federal funding of the County Road 18
highway improvement and bridge construction.
3 . Planning a future meeting with the Senate Transportation
Committee to discuss transportation needs in Scott County.
BAS/jms
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Administrative Intern
RE: Highway 41 Improvements ( Informational)
DATE: November 14 , 1985
Introduction and Background
On Thursday, November 14 , 1985 a meeting was held between Chaska
city officials and Mn/DOT representatives to discuss improvements
to Highway 41 scheduled for next summer. The improvements that
will be taking place are as follows :
1. Complete reconstruction of Highway 41 in Chaska from 1st
Street to the railroad tracks. The City of Chaska will
also be performing limited sewer and water replacement
in this area in conjunction with the highway improvements .
During the majority of this phase of the project, two lanes
will remain open. The start-up date for this phase has
been set for May 14 , 1986 with completion of the final
surface scheduled for mid-August.
2 . Complete reconstruction of the railroad crossing in Chaska
on Highway 41 . This project will commence on May 14 , 1986
and will last approximately 10 working days. During this
time, Highway 41 through downtown Chaska will be closed.
Highway 41 traffic will be detoured onto Chaska side streets
during this phase.
3 . Redecking the Highway 41 river crossing in Chaska. Mn/DOT
crews will be working 24 hours per day starting May 14 ,
1986 to complete this project. During this phase, one
lane of the bridge will remain open at all times. This
phase is scheduled to be complete in 10 working days.
4. Milling ( two inches of new base and overlay) of Highway
41 from Highway 212 to Highway 5 . This phase will be a
twenty working day project commencing sometime in June,
1986 . One lane of Highway 41 will remain open on this
stretch at all times during this phase.
5. Redecking of the second bridge on Highway 41 . This phase
is schedule for start-up in June, 1986 and again is expected
to take approximately ten working days. One lane of the
bridge will remain open at all times .
These improvements will have an obvious adverse affect on highway
traffic on 169 and 101 in Shakopee. Officials from the recreational
facilities in Shakopee are aware of the Highway 41 improvements.
Mn/DOT representatives mentioned on several occasions during
the November 14 , 1985 meeting that they will make every effort
to complete their projects before the opening of the Renaissance
Festival.
BAS/jms
Metropolitan Area Manage'6 fits` l dcatian
of the Twin City Area
November 5 , 1985
TO: ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN
JOINT COMPENSATION STUDY
FROM: William S. Joynes , Chairman
MAMA General Labor Relations Committee
SUBJECT: JOINT COMPENSATION STUDY STATUS REPORT
During the month of October each Occupational Advisory Group has met a
number of times to establish task value hierarchies by factor using
individual valuer composite values from round 1 , preliminary valuing , and
round 1 .5 , additional individual valuing. Most of the Occupational
Advisory Group Valuing has been completed. These values are currently
being entered into the data base.
Business Advisors will generate preliminary valuing reports , factor
weights, and sample position hierarchies for the Personnel Committee and
MAMA General Labor Relations Committee review within the next few weeks.
Each jurisdiction will receive a set of reports following these reviews.
The timeframe will be dependent upon the extent of further task valuing
needed which may be later than the original projected date of November 15.
WSJ : hf c
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT
PERMITS ISSUED OCTOBER, 1985
6876 - 6922 Yr. to Date Previous Year
Number Number Valuation Number Valuation
Mo. Yt .
Single Fam-Sewered 1 29 230723947 4 29 13806 ,000
Single Fam-Septic 6 18 1 , 343 ,944 3 10 1 , 122 ,941
Multiple Dwellings 2 13 13680, 100 1 12 1 ,204,500
(No.Units ) (YTD Units ) ( 8 ) (40 ) (4) ( 32 )
Dwelling Additions 3 40 181 ,088 3 51 364,007
Other - 11 1415722 5 11 13 , 199 ,021
Comm New Bldgs 2 7 3 ,123 , 341 1 8 15740,875
Comm Bldg Addns - 13 9 ,862 , 510 - - -
Industrial-Sewered - - - - -
Ind-Sewered Addns 1 53475 - =
Industrial-Septic - - - - - -
Ind-Septic Addns - - - - - -
Accessory/Garages 3 40 260, 976 4 45 373 ,438
Signs & Fences 4 63 653298 5 38 435357
Fireplaces/Wood Stove 4 13 29 ,630 1 7 205130
Grading Foundation 5 12 175 ,500 1 10 2 ,637 ,000
Remodeling (Res ) 7 30 95 , 309 7 36 1415792
Remodeling ( Inst) - 1 15093 ,000 - 1 65345 ,000
Remodeling (Comm or 6 32 1 ,830;628 4 41 704,209
Ind)
TOTAL TAXABLE 49 349 20 ,868,468 42 318 2333573270
TOTAL INSTITUTIONAL - 1 1 ,093 ,000 - 1 6 ,345 ,000
GRAND TOTAL 49 350 21 ,961,468 42 319 29 , 702 ,270
No. Ytd. No. Ytd.
Variances 3 14 1 6
Conditional Use 4 32 2 15
Re-Zoning 1 5 1 2
Moving 2 6 - 1
Electric Permits 30 232 26 231
Plbg. .& Htg. Permits 27 218 50 249
Razing Permits 1
Residential - 1
Commercial - - -
Total dwelling units in City after completion of all construction permitted
to date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33825
Cora Hullander
Bldg. Dept. Secretary
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IN OCTOBER, 1985 t j
6876 David Rutt 630 E. 4th Garage $ 7 ,400
6877 Thomas Bourke 2094 Foothill � o
House 59 ,000
6878 James Hauer X442VlthAve .
n Parkwayouse 46 ,800
6879 Preneer Systems 8852 Ofc . Bldg. 100 ,000
6880 Clete Link 140 E. 10t Ave . 4-plex 25 ,500
� A4ed ,-/ 1 unit
6881 Clete Link 1403 E. 10th Ave. 4-plex 253500
/_,t rte- l� Irl 1 unit
6882 Clete Link 1405 E. 10th Ave. 4-plex 25 ,500
' 14-7-' 1 unit
6883 Clete Link 1407 E. 10th Ave . 4-plex 25 ,500
/ /" /--,/ 1 un i t
6884 John Fraser 198 W. 10th Ave . Sign 1 ,000
6885 Clocke Enterprises 239 W. 1st Ave. Alt . 25 ,000
6886 Strunk Woodworks 120 E. 1st Ave. Alt . 1 ,000
6887 Linderholm, Inc. 574 Marschall Rd. Alta 13 , 700
6888 Idella Shutrop 5765 Eagle Crk. Blvd. Fill
6889 Cancelled
6890 Metro. Fireplace 1029 Legion St . Fireplace 23500
6891 James Bucholz 1976 Co. Rd. 89 Fireplace 500
6892 Don McKush 3691 Marschall Rd. House 70 ,000
6893 G.F. Juergens 2121 Hillside Dr. House 80 ,000
6894 Charles Lenzen 107 N. Prairie Alt . 5 ,000
6895 Glen Schmitt 1729 Presidential Ln. Alt . 2 ,500
6896 Andrew Heiland 649 Jefferson St . Garage 7 ,000
6897 Donald Wagner 519 E. 1st Fireplace 250
Chimney
6898 Thomas Haeg 1055 Harrison Stg. Bldg. 600
6899 Metro. Fireplace 1217 Tyler Fireplace 3 ,000
6900 Lowells Auto Parts 1257 Marschall Rd. Alt . 25 ,000
6901 Valley Sign 1257 Marschall Rd. Sign 15400
6902 Charlie Ries 1028 S . Minnesota Alt . 695
6903 Cherne Contracting 1109 Co. Rd. 83 Grading 403000
6904 Michael Menke 1028 Prairie St . Addn. 17 , 500
6905 Kalkes Bros . Const . 2393 Hauer Trail Addn. 8 ,000
6906 Super 8 Bldrs . 581 Marschall Rd. Motel 9333000
6907 Shakopee 84 Ptnshp 576 Marschall Rd. Alt . 49 ,000
6908 John DuBois 2231 Marschall Rd. Alt . 500
6909 John DuBois 1705 W. 3rd Grading 103000
6910 Fremont Ind. 4400 Valley Ind. Blvd.. Alt . 1 , 550
6911 Glenn Heyda 819 E. 3rd Ave . Stg. Bldg. 704
6912 Wiggin, Inc. 2020 12th Ave . Apt. 116 ,000
(4 units )
6913 Ryan Const . 600 Valldy Ind. Blvd. Grading 40,000
6914 Michael Heitz 622 Adams Alt . 700
6915 Signs of Quality 574 Marschall Rd. Sign 600
6916 Signs of Quality 120 E. 1st Ave . Sign 300
6917 Howe , Inc. 7632 Hwy 101 Addn 3 ,300
6918 Thomas Schmidt 330 E. Fourth Addn 2 ,600
6919 Michael Menke 711 Menke�C,�* cleHouse 85 ,300
6920 Richard Sames 1480 Blue Heron Tr. a House 90,000
6921 Harvey Tidemann`�� 'B"/8�Ho�nom* House 85 ,000
6922 Ryan Const . �? �'3 600 V ley In Blvd. Foundation 30,000
U 10 W P P NM M 111 o M o.-.o M P LAOF o F h N o ^ a P M0 M0 N LA'LA 111 0
a
r- 10 o 0 00 .-ID Ma PP P M LA a 4 0 o SPF W a o W oa W 00 .- I
P ^ W N 0oNfU ^wo W PoMNN o oa a w.o P .o. o LnM0D.- Cr,
^
(b W I I 1 11 1 1 - fl 1 II 1 I t l 1 � I I I1 11
Q U 44) m M0 o.-000lA0MMM00LA0Foo Ln o W wa000�h00. P00o00o0N
C Z FSO ^ r-W a LAooO(UooFLnLnUlNo0o0 Ln oNMPOLA00m0 - N oOOFoLA00
.. o F to N P.D N o 111 o CO M ^a N N N W.o W W to P o N a iLo o P Lno o In o w o M
m a ^ W c i o o ^PF W Ma +-PMaaMa F P W r-CD P AnN0.w 0 0 o M Paa
-¢ NF Ln MLAO MPa�-MFF�oCOM—N N -o, LA CO NN ;NMoo M LA LAW NM—P
> i
Ln a w N LA'D i P W w N N CU— m Ln N o- Ln F M ;m N
W W W W M�- �- P a %D N �O
P P ' j P N I N -
M Q i �i
Q IT F O.- — o 0 0 0 W oLnLna O0 LnoF0o M o W 0--00oF00 V mD 0000000 W
LL 'O fU ID W r-W a —W O o o h o o N W M to N o o o o W O N M M O M O W F 0 W F o 0 o M 0 L O a
O OU cD.- a r-Ln N P0N0IA W 0 W 10^+-01lANNNP W LA Po NLA !,o c0 IA r- 00oP0.100o
U) F¢ 0CO, 0 0— -—W InMW Wal DPP'laaaD N 'W ^(U WP ;IAF M N' P0001F.P .-o
Q FF P - MLANo F^^ a^NMa� N aN^Na '.w•D a NLA Ln—IhM W PI
W Myo o tAmoP Fa10 N1; I N ^ ha NM -M m N_: :,LA
P P a 1 a Ln W•-iLU a v M
'a P M i - o .-P
cu cu qr
W
rw
0 00 0 00 0 00000000000000000 0 0'0000000000 0 00000000
Z o0 0 0o O 0000000000000 co0C.0 O 00000000000 a: 00000000
w . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .; . . ., . . . .
> o0 0 0 0000000000000'00 o W 00 L11 Oo00 M 00000000 l
M o C. 0 o o o 0 0 C.0 C.o w o 0 0 0 0 o Ln Pj o o a +0 0 0 0 P, P o 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ir o0 O o oP oo�o lAPNIl1POWM�- a o0 P IPoa0 o. (Uo 00000 co
Mo M a LAN Ln I LAP a a.oLnLANNNN
`F-• M P F F IA h M;— F P P P ^ I a o M
!lL
W 1
Q V 1J 1
Z
WQ I
Ix > ! t
w z
,
D o
Z L J I' 1 I I
Q W O W 00 o 0 0 O'O 0 0 0 C.0"M 0 C.0 C.0 C,0 .N c,N x 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 C. ^. C.0 C.m0�0 O F
W '.O ,.M.o M -.o .o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln'T Ln 0 1n O P O 0 "P o m0 o 0 0 0 o F 0 0 W 0 0 01F 0 C. 0^ -
1-H ^
> U W W N .j f� r- .111,I'1 Ut M a co N o F to w.- M .o OD N a0 Ln o LA Ut O Ut IA 1
zQ P P ^ I{ ^ N r-r- N-O IA S- IAPFIA^ a Ch r- W ' F M C.OD lA W LA0
w 1
0 IP - N WMNNLnN i M ;a W N i ko CD oFlU,M —M I
w
0 w i
I � i
z
w
1 i � 111
,
ww co
;
z ul ►- ❑
O cow w U)
zrA NH f- JuJw (oLWa0 U cn 4 ❑ W LL
U w
0 wwzU) z wiA F at-WH- "" r ❑ F a J w = 0)
W a w w c9ulz0U1- W ...(L;. J
w �z aI- Sa z ww (A Zwt-r- Z as F �A • U.F- IA m ¢ "a az
0. ILO -` •+ (A W V? u)W W •-� W U �-+ �••�a a0a. a ❑ Qzz"' F W OW W W Qw
O Ua u} 1- U) - w0 :] U �-+ LSW a W z W 0 W ••+ �-+� OW -ax Z > MW W W W Z
Y JF- Q w w x2Z W GD � Jaawa wwW(L -CL 0D a U? Q W ZQUU) Q w - LL U- VJ `
Q ail I CL U) - Ul uuw0 = -1 w W F- F- z LU0 F Hr- Z W❑I-- F W HWU' U
x a .+ N. U) u? ZZuzQ wa (L -j Jw U 1 w zl- QQ W LQ z - < MzwYF-
o
U7 W a 7-�•+ Q � Q QQ •'"W C7 W J 2L3 ¢ 0_uYZ Q > OHa>- > LL00 W w � a -' '+ ❑ Uz ❑
' u > Q aaJU F- mC? t9Ua UoOwo 0 a: o <0 F-32 W Sa F- > QF-W aQ W w
LL wcfj w Jr J LL LL frWF- QZZ � W •b �•+ M U Z W 00 W Sx0 Q O I- - W W UUoo
O U W _: J Q F- C om'J ial F- '-+ ... a a ♦- "+ 0 i-- W w w>- LD CD >- '•' W W L.R U u, p
0 Q U} �-+ J - x w 0 OtY ❑ mQ w , w J - Z wJ0 uuww JJI-w a W ZaZ cn
>- \ U W U ¢ U UJ=> x 0 < JJ L2 JWU W U U w FQ wz w -j WW
{- ^f- z (A x w W < Mow Zi90•••• D U J a w 0Y w[9 co u QU F_ JJQQ > tnO0' F -1 m C9Qu? J
o '' W �•-• •t 6. W. 1 a Q•-�w ^-• �-•OOJ W W W JF-� 0 - - f-0 OOOF- t- -•� OOo C ❑ ZzzJ V? Q
U p 0 L H u71L u? F-UJ7Jm u 0. M CL Z 30 w 0 r 0 z J > QW WLL ^. 0
O
Ln 0 ^n1 ^ rU coo- NM VU1 'M'l
M v Ul� r• �Doo .- t• or• nJ M 7 N M vD r•o ^ x• 10 on Ch Ij
• cQ U ^ N '(• MM t o ^ ^r• - MMM MM M M IIY 0 .� i• NN W NNMMMm 'T ?t 0000
MMMMMf`iMMt'1MM Ul N MLn w W Ln to
LL !'iM MM +: f'1MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM fi MMMMMMMMMMM iF MMMMMf'IMM
N U N W o 0+ U+ N N UI P M G+ co LI) N ID co v o D+ 0 N �
a . . . . . . . . I
M co 1` c0 0 1- o N N ul 10 ID M r`Cu UI co o m M
N U1 .D N Cr Q V G O 0 M N N co co [J+ v D+ D
W
¢ U M o a 0 0 0 0 O O Q O O O v .- Cl O G
CL z cu4Daa00MOOv00to0Nr" oa0 000 U} C)+ 0 C w �
.¢•, ♦D o CD D+Ln .D M o CT Cl CO 1`- N G N D• C' L!) V' N N 00 IT 10 - {
CL: v *- a N m 1- U1 Ul h IT N M n+ LA 0 tT M M O (ki Ut 1- 00 co O i itj
¢ co N U) N 10 Ll) M I'1 Ch Q N M M ID M 0 Ln N N O N 1
>
LA N r, Ln a O o v o M v
OD w M o U1 ro N fl-
u)
Ul - M
1 ¢ '
O J 1
d M000DoonooN000v0oGU1 N (r, CT r-0000 N No
LL O N O O O O QM O a U) o o U) Gl N �- oa - c0 CD co v0000 v OG o M
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U .O w CT 0 0 0 O - C O w N N 1` 0 o o r- LA ID N .D CD IT Ln
U) H ¢ v N CT N UI G, UI N U1 N M 0 CT D+ 0 ID u co c0 N v N CD
6 co IT N a N 0 m N M CO N v Cn N ID In 0 O G CD UI N
[r m UI co-N M C I` N N v v c+ ti o .D i
N [n M M %0 N v O N
¢ T N
W N
>-
W
D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 o n o 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
z 0 0 0 0 o Q o 0 0 0 0 0 o G o G o 0 0 Q 0 o G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w
> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 o Q o 0 0
w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Ul o 0 o 0 Cl 0 0 o c, a- O
a' o N C, O N o a,Ui o U) co Ln o Ln 0 0 O v o
ao o N M C Ln o N L L N 7 o m o o M i {
F- N - - IT IT Ul N N o o a�
LU M w
a
o z I ;
CL
W ¢ I j i ii
a' S> I ! r I
W z ( 11
O O
I � '
2
¢ oGG000QoG000000000cr ID CT m I-o00r• o 00 Q o 1
w O 0 0 C. 0 o Q Q G 0 0 o Q O 0 0 a o o M v M M v o o o o v O o 0 0
t- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i l
> U o 0 U) o vn N N N
z ¢ W N N in 0 G� C.� �D .n N o M M 0 '
W N M M ID m Ln U) Ul M co 0 o v j
W
N
N I
U WLU
!
_..�
i
LU
Ll
w W
u, LU
M LL
CO
A m U)to W )-
z J W W U m J W W U)
O -00u ..CAO O U W J
O U HIY — >w O W w LL z 4
W I Z ¢> JCC2 6 a (1) S- > O F-
W = w m x o w -. 1 J z O J C W O
CL LL J ¢ a:Uw 0(ALL ifi. 000U ¢ W 0 F H
O > N UJ a F O 0 z 0 U) U)w U) U) O
:L _j 1 W j W 0 W I WK).b W(L (A"0 Z ¢m = Im O
d ¢a z W Q -IC z U)¢CAW L) wY I W a CY (1) co 0 m 0 O
S a O W LL > w;: Y a z z :• o w G U co J J m O W W .-�U W W O
w W-C N OQ>•-3 W ¢OJWJ �-+►:Z O� W Z UM Z.
ZU WwQxai- . Wtx oWJJI-Ot900 •+ i- 00 ¢ ¢ mz x
LL wU) a: W W Om U)aLL ¢ CA Za w LL LL CA mmJ J W O W
O 0 W 10 aUUS. t-0 Ul U Z ��••� W W W - J LLU Li-
m
O U1 Z ►+ W z w • 0 a' O U) E Cn 0 F E- Cr IY W W W W to
)- \ H�+ ¢� JOU W�-+UUZ W W U) .•-.EUO w w w W I-1-1-U U zU
H �H ¢JF-Om W U)tY [r2U) D[Y f-¢ L �+ NIi ¢ 7 f- zz ¢U) [A ¢ 7 Q
oZ -1 WZO W t.- 0- 0 - ¢ W 0 w = O O z:L OI- -+ mCL n�
U O a.w wmJxwwUraLt. 3U) ¢ w x U V Q —CYUNEs--
0
LA OU -DM r0 r -nJMano NM0 ei o a o �nJ00 i o0 iF
00 z0 NN NN N N(UM MM My vv 't Ul • a * -N cum0 t o_ �
O ¢ UlUlU)U) U)U)UtLnN W WLALALnIANLn W.D + U' ?r Oc0OOU) '.h C+a
LL MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM # M iU Mf'IMMM iF MM M
r
U ll1aD-V o V o m llY .- o NNtl1 o+ M o o P P o C.
IL
P N o h h LA S h M F 0.10.F w N F�a D O Ln h F M Ln h a+ O N h Ln 1D o o N Ln V V
h oFF 10P h CDO+ CnM.D r- VFNF10Paha,LnOLAOCO w �a 40 O o co (D
w CU -N
0 w 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1
Q U CDwmwr- ovw o 000M- CD.ooCD.MM1A -W M V Ma+ -Mo W 00 OCD N o o V V o 0
a. Z LAhF V 0CDN - W NNhc+N0004+P W P-- NCC -CN -FNNom o CDN LA o O N N L(1 LA '
Q . . . . . .
►+ Fh.00D V N-- h Fh.Opo- OD0LAND aaoODMPOc a,In om h P a, m 0 Cn 0 CO CD
z 0vmC.V MC> 0 P CD Lnm .o to N
Q D- Ln0 .-0 N P V N -0 Mo Ln CD 10 ID a N N a b
U) OM O N M M No-^+ 'o MW ON O m o V N + j N N
aD w N- M- m co N 0 M Ln N � M M
1 M M M N N ,-
r
M
0 CJ
Q wwmvmc:-w o o at OCD 0 o O .D 10 O o
LL O VhI'-M- 01-- to t- 0 N OF oV COh- m Om N N N C.Ch a+ NN V o O F h Ln LA '
0 of-- . .
U hh .D .-LA h-- h FNM W MN U100�M CD.O LAP CD o LA DD 10 a+ o F o 0M M LA UI o 0 M M
to r¢ aD V a+a+LA •- V to V o Ln N- tU V N T l'I In -.a M O V O M F O V M M CC, N Ln IA CD CD h f-
<
Q 1- 0 M M V a+ h LA inaD0OD- FFFNM1MtUc0-M0N0M0 V —.D CD CD @ N N Ln N
cOhLAoo apo D• Va� � MN V�M1;VO1;C; - C LAN h o O .-
0 N o F V 10 P. IA Ln�- P V P N w F N�-r- h - - V V T i N N
Q Ch N m V V
W
>-zO
H O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 1
r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. O O O O O O O O O O
LnooOo 0o LA LA'oOLn'Ln'Oo Ln'ooCD'ooLn' ooLn'Ln'oOoo LA o o Ln N o o: N N j
CC hO Poo h V N 'Do oMNoo .Po �a.aFW V ON1D Ln OOO a, 0 LA Ln O o. M M
D. hw1Da,v Ln CD 0 ONO 01 -FIA0 -C>MMMP V 0 0 V NF PLA LAM M F h O w w 0 N N
Ix CD V LnoN 1 Cn N 1;.- NN11 O NMLAUL.a1oC;1;oz a; o+ a• O C V V
O. N o a�LA o N N aD N P-10 a+ :10 :M CO N N T 'N N V P Ln U1
2 N .- b N
o
W u
I I I I
w x> ! i
D z
I- o
0
Q FFF VMoapo ..a C6o'lAO+0000tnool!)oNf6oNNc0aD000 lA f.-o, F
of o •o o. o
G o F V N N w O w O G+- �o to o o N o 0 0 IA o 0 o CD N T O tT V o�a o 0 W to N O N o. o O O O o
rr
z U ODFLnN M W P-Ln cD O.D •t.
•OmLn�;V ;F:r-WCh... O h M M o C.
zQ �-oNCOF F F NG+N cu 10 M F V tAFCDNFF 0 a+ F F
w 10 LA P CD F h. o+ F M CD 0 LA V LA CD Cl CU Ln F IA F N N 0 0
W + + +
CL MNP w M m
N cDN Ln i
O< �^ ! JJ
CLcz
j
o ,
IL
Q
to z
w r o
U L) z U
Q O U C 7 CO
w QQ U W wr w -1 U) U)
E x 0YU w U,- O z U) W w CO
w W�•+ 7n K 4 1 ZS O O W w U) K a:
O S E r w U) (n N m CL I.- > to w U) m 1••1 0 U r r O w
W Z z w J O W Z CYw FH Ur CY - ZZ r LL
w D rrr - U HJ ct: w tnJ W a_ Q > W W - U)
LL U- 0 s F- d F-0 LL •• m a: L = a Z
O J Jd dwwa� > x ^21 Z ^bE U U) O W [L' UUl W d W d
Jr JJa. U5LL N W �-+ 0w Jt! MCL V = to +-+ > w K
¢ dLL D - 0 W rLI) drLZy < z NU) wwO 00 a- r 0 >- )-
7-1
mom+ LLLL I LL V 0 < -i = Z W1-1m z �•+ U) N-8 w 0) 11)I.0 •a Om X w U V
CO) W m 1 1 1 1 � w 1•+ rrO0J2 W W 0 U ::) 1MZ W CL W r (1) V „ Z
U 11wU) Nu)wW J tri OC, ¢ U)¢ 1-� O 2roUU W ZU)O ¢ U) I r Z m z w W
LL wU) W S W ZZ z d w W LLZi >-OnwwLL TWO W .'_ I- J W J1-+ J W w d U' U'
C 07w .-• ••.+ 00S W z .•. 0 r. U) u . Lo 1- 0.72 �.~+ S ~- x °a < ••• ¢ 2 LL r = Z
O ¢ rm � 1•+F- f O JQ wYOOL JwJO ¢ R W !- (r (A W 2ww J r4' r 6 U) U) I"'
>- \ < m < < (0 0 -1 W CLLLOJ ^•� JJ ¢ LL < rrw > 2 � JrLLU) UC): U (L �•1 W �•+ E Z w
r -F JwJmz i Q m m ( m !- O + 2 .200U) JQ • (n .. zz W mry_ C1) d [L2 D m d X E Z
oZ ¢ > Fww ww0 w oOQOzI-wZ2 wx O wfYZZ '- W 0 =) W O'-' Q `' 4 w 0: Q W O O
V D 0O CO CL CL D_ CL 00 MW Ito 1^+a. J CL 0- CL m Ud
O
U) CU orlloo - Nm NonJPN --o u(110 - It- U) ch N
co ' U O .-M P ? P in U) Cu M M M P 0 ; ; N N M M F c0 m T 4- �- +� - '� c0 •�' '�' '�
1 c OQ it NNN N N N N(UMMM mmmmMMMMMNIP P ?F LA Ln F * o+ )C' cm iF
*- LL PPPPPPPP �► PPPPPPPPPPP VPPP PP PP PP PP M PP iF P tii P P ii
N I-
IL
0
N
W
w W I!
¢
a z ti i
w M I 1
¢
> I
LA m 11
N W -tU 11 1 1 t
¢
o c J j i
LL D to I
W N
>-z i I
F O it I
¢ 3 ! f
CL IT
¢
I
a �
w u
a: ¢ i
W =>
1 ,
ix F
F O
O < I {
z
z¢ LA
W
W i
R v
D.'
i
U z ;
O
cr i
a.
Ix i
a
N
J
� C
w zF
w o
1. LL 0 F
O
J F q
Q 2
i a Z)
Cfi w 2 LL
U
It W CA
0 ow
O
H � H
U �
O
,10 Z U
LL
O1ita�
0'4 G Metropolitan Council
ti {r 300 Metro Square Building
Seventh and Robert Streets
�fJ St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Telephone(612)291-6359
� P
6
November 5, 1985
NO .,
7 1S k•
CITY OF
Eldon A. Reinke, Mayor
City of Shakopee
129 E. First Av.
Shakopee, MPJ 55379
Dear Mayor Reinke:
Local review of the forecasts is an essential part of our forecasting process.
The issues raised in your letter of Oct. 11, 1985 have been discussed by Jean
Andre of your staff and Victor Ward of our staff. The discussions should lead
to an acceptable solution before the Metropolitan Development and Investment
Framework (MDIF) is adopted early next year.
The forecasts reflect recent trends and, therefore, must be constantly
monitored to identify changes that would require additional regional re-
sources. In your letter you mentioned that 154 multifamily units have been
approved for construction. The forecast assumptions did not include a project
that large, so the forecasts used in the MDIF will be changed to allow for
these projects. This will affect both the 1990 and 2000 forecasts but will not
raise the 2000 forecast to the level suggested in your letter. Mr. Ward will
work out the particulars with your staff.
Based on our examination of recent trends, we expect the region to continue
growing but at a reduced rate. Most of the region' s growth in housing demand
and job creation was due to the maturing of the post-war "baby boom" children.
They moved from their parents' home into schools and then into jobs. We still
expect local families to be the major source of demand for additional housing
and furnish most of the employment increases. The number of young people today
and in the near future is expected to be much smaller than in the period just
past so the total additional demand they will produce will be smaller. This
influence means the changes from 1990 to 2000 will be less than those exper-
ienced over the last decade.
The issues pertaining to land demand for development through the year 2000
needs to be resolved as your staff and mine define the new Metropolitan Urban
Service Area (MUSA) . I suggest that representatives from our respective staffs
review our current delineation of the MUSA and make sure we agree. They can
work from that common base to resolve how much land is needed and identify the
parcels on either side of the MUSA. During their discussion, T1s. Andre and
Mr. Ward examined some issues that I feel certain can be resolved.
The MDIF allows for changes other than those forecasted. Our main concern when
monitoring a city's population, housing and employment is if the regional re-
sources needed for development have been programmed to serve areas that will
need them. Hopefully, either regular reviews by our staff or by local offi-
cials will flag changes that could require additional services.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Eldon A. Reinke, Mayor
City of Shakopee
November 5, 1985
Page Two
If you have any further concerns, please let me know. Our staff will be
discussing this matter further with members of your staff.
Sincerely,
Sandra S. Gardebring, Chair
SSG:emp
cc: Raymond Joachim, Metropolitan Council District 14
/6
TENTATIVE AGENDA
Energy and Transportation Committee
Shakopee, Minnesota
November 21, 1985
Chrm. Ziegler Presiding:
1. Roll Call at 7: 30 P.M.
2 . Approval of Minutes - October 17, 1985
3 . Action: Transit Feasibility Study Report
4. Informational Items.
A. Scott County Solid Waste Resource Recovery Request
for Proposals Update
B. Shakopee Recycling Request for Proposals Update
C. SCRAP Final Survey Results
D. Recycling Monthly Report - October
E. Dial-A-Ride Monthly Report - October
F. Van Pool Monthly Report - October
5 . Other Business
A. Van Pool Party - Tentatively Scheduled for
December 19 , 1985
B.
6. Adjournment to December 19 , 1985.
Barry A. Stock
Admin. Intern
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
P.S. At 6 : 00 p.m. on Thursday, November 21, 1985 I will be meeting
with the leaders of the volunteer organizations that are
involved in Shakopee ' s Recycling program. We will be discussing
the following issues at this meeting:
i. Final target area survey results and comments.
2. Improving efficiency in the pickup of the recyclables.
3 . Improving public awareness of the program.
4. Problems encountered in the target areas and whether
or not the city should purchase bins or bags for Shakopee
residents .
5 . Problems encountered at the drop-off site.
All Energy and Transportation Committee Members are welcome
and encouraged to attend this meeting.
17
PROCEEDINGS Or THE SHAKOPEE ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 179 1985
Chairman Ziegler called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. with Commissioners
Allen, Dunwell, McNeil, and Spiotta present. Barry Stock, Administrative
Intern, was also present. Commissioners Schwingler, Sorenson, and Weeks
were absent.
Barry Stock opened the meeting by presenting the Recycling Report for September.
He noted that a recycling flier was distributed to each household in the week
preceeding the September pickup. Participation rates, however, remained at
their previous level of consistency for September. Mr. Stock also presented
the participation rates for the month of October, explaining that participation
rate drops were probably due to inclement weather.
The Commissioners discussed the problem of lack of storage for excess paper.
Mr. Stock has located a storage space to ease this problem. They also discussed
changes that could be made in the future to make the collection system more
efficient.
Barry Stock reported on a recycling meeting he had recently attended, and in
particular, he described a video on a recycling plant in Virginia that was
shown. Mr. Stock will try to obtain the video for the Commissioners to view
at the next meeting.
Mr. Stock has completed a video on Shakopee's recycling project, SCRAP, which
was shown at this time. Concensus was that Mr. Stock had done an excellent
job and should make the video available to various community organizations as
well as the school system.
Spiotta/McNeil moved to approve the minutes of the September 19th and
September 30th meetings as kept. Motion carried unanimously.
SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT RESOLUTION NO. 2453
Mr. Stock recalled that on September 19, 1985, the Shakopee Energy and Trans-
portation Committee met to consider a solid waste management development plan
strategy for the City of Shakopee in response to recent Metropolitan Council
legislation which requires counties and cities in the metropolitan area to
develop a land disposal abatement plan that is in accordance with the objectives
established by the Metropolitan Council in their Solid Waste Management
Development Guide/Policy plan.
He continued that under this plan, cities and the County are required to work
together in developing an overall county solid waste management plan that has
objectives consistent with the individual objectives of each community in
Scott County. In an effort to have some control over Shakopee's destiny in
terms of waste management, Staff believes it is vital for the City of Shakopee
to inform the County of solid waste goals and objectives for inclusion in the
County's solid waste management master plan.
Energy & Transportation Committee
October 17, 1985
Page 2
On September 30, 1985, the Energy and Transportation Committee reviewed and
recommended several objectives and policy statements for inclusion in the
County's solid waste management master plan. In response to the Committee's
request, Staff drafted Resolution No. 2453 which formally requests the Scott
County Board of Commissioners to include Shakopee's objectives and policy
statements in the County's solid waste management master plan.
Commissioner Spiotta asked Mr. Stock if any of the twelve policy statements
made in the resolution would cost the City money. Mr. Stock pointed out
several that could, but he emphasized that Scott County already has the money
and support for the program.
Allen/Dunwell moved to recommend to City Council that Resolution No. 2453 be
adopted as drafted and sent to the Scott County Board of Commissioners for
inclusion in Scott County's Solid Waste Management Master Plan. Motion
carried unanimously.
TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY UPDATE
On October 7, 1985, Staff met with representatives from the transit consulting
firm that is performing the Transit Service Demonstration Program Study for the
cities of Chaska, Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, and Shakopee. Mr. Stock explained
the proposed conceptual transit service plan which the consultants presented to
the four communities. He noted that the plan assumes three very important
factors for Shakopee:
1 . Discontinuance of the current van pool program - to be replaced by two
peak a.m. and p.m. fifty passenger buses.
2. Elimination of the Dial-A-Ride program.
3. An increase in Shakopee's transit mill levy from 1 .25 mills to 1 .5 mills.
Mr. Stock presented the estimated cost for the service plan, based on a 1 .25
mill levy for each community which would make over $800,000 available to run
this transit program. However, he added that if this plan is pursued, each
community's mill levy would increase to 1.5 mills creating over one million
dollars to run the program. He also pointed out that the, estimated cost of
$633,268 assumes no revenues (free rides) !
Because of the excessive amount of money available for the program, Staff
requested that a shared-ride taxi program be created in Shakopee along with
maintaining the van pool component of the program for those who could not be
serviced under the proposed plan. The consultants agreed to incorporate these
ideas into their proposed plan, Mr. Stock reported.
Mr. Stock explained that the reason for the difference in the 1 .25 and 1 .5
mill levy can be attributed to the proposed midday service to the Eden Prairie
Center, Chaska, and Chanhassen. State legislation requires that transit
systems in the metro area with midday service frequency of 60 to 90 minutes be
assessed at 1.5 mills; midday service frequency of less than 60 minutes would
be assessed at 2.0 mills.
Energy & Transportation Committee
October 17, 1985
Page 3 rJ
Mr. Stock indicated that on Tuesday, October 22, 1985, in the Eden Prairie
Community Center at 7:30 p.m. the Regional Transit Board Chairman and staff
person will lead an open forum for elected and appointed officials. He urged
the Commissioners to attend this meeting.
In addition, on November 5, 1985, representatives from each community involved
in the study will meet with the Regional Transit Board officials in an effort
to get some answers to questions.
Mr. Stock distributed the Van Pool Monthly Report and the Dial-A-Ride Monthly
Report for September. The Dial-A-Ride report showed that ridership is down a
little, but Mr. Stock stated that the Labor Day holiday could have made the
difference. In connection with the Van Pool report, Mr. Stock explained that
he spent $290 on side panels for the vans and also started another van pool.
Chairman Ziegler noted he sent a Letter of Appreciation to Richards Asphalt
Refining Company to thank them for the tour of their waste processing facility.
The Commissioners discussed several ideas to make the van pools and Dial-A-Ride
program more festive in the Christmas season.
McNeil/Dunwell moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:52 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
The next meeting will be held on November 21 , 1985, at 7:30 p.m.
Barry Stock Judy Hughes
Administrative Intern Recording Secretary
Transit/Recycling Coordinator
TENTATIVE AGENDA
ADJ .SPECIAL SESSION SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 19 , 1985
Mayor Reinke presiding
1 ] Roll Call at 7 : 00 P .M.
2] Recess for an H.R.A. Meeting
31 Reconvene
4] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers
5] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS
61 Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterick
are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted
by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items
unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will
be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal
sequence on the agenda. )
71 Communications :
a] Paul Wermerskirchen re : resignation from ICC
b] r
8] Public Hearings : None
9] Boards and Commissions:
a] Recommendation to Adopt A Recreational Vehicle Park Ordinance
b] Preliminary Approval of Prairie House 1st Addition, lying,:East
of Valleyfair
c] Preliminary & Final Approval of Canterbury Park 2nd Addition,
lying North of CR-16 and West of Cr-83
11 Sanitary Sewer Allocation .
2] Preliminary Approval & Res. of Final Approval No. 2474
101 Reports from Staff:
a] Eaglewood General Obligation Improvement Bonds
b] Summary on Shakopee Brochure (Res. No. 2469 and 2470)
c] Capital Equipment - Rescue Truck Bids
*d] Racetrack District Land Use Study
-' e] Sanitary Sewer Allocation Policy
f] Equipment Yard Screening
g] Fourth Avenue East Traffic Control
*h] Remodeling Police Clerical Area
*i] Semi Final Estimate #5 for 5th Ave . Sanitary Sewer 1984-6
j] Payment of Bills in Amount of $1 , 149, 689 . 16
*k] Buy Back of Police Holiday Time
*1] Completion of Probationary Period for Glenn Heyda
m] Confining Blanket Easement Across L3 (ex. N 201 ) & N.;25 ' of L4,
Block 1 , Terrence Add'n. - memo on table
n] Capital Equipment - Postage Meter
uosuapuG 'H ugor
quawu.zno Cpv [CT
[P
s@i4T.z-edSTQ Tle0ST3 JO u0140V GAT4'eTsTLa7 uo a4�epdn [q
,�au,104gV fCgTO wojj q,zoda.z - p-eoH Taa4S Zu'51TA [-e
: ssauTsng .zaugO [ZT
(ao-BTd q,odaQ)
DJGJGul u-BTd TuawdoTanapaH au4 uo fu [,I-eaH 0TTgnd V L3uTTT'eO Pu-e
40aCazd 4uawdoTanapaE JOJ u01413oTTddb fuT4daoov ` ,LVZ *ON • sa'd [p
s4uuaf.zaS aOTTod JOJ u-eTd �-ed S96T louTusTTgegsg ` F?9t7Z *ON ' Sad [o#
safpnr uoT409Tg $uT4uToddy ` TLVZ 'ON ' saH [q*
T-T PTg4 - �PngS aSfl Pu-e'I 40TJgSTQ :jo-e.zgao-eH alio, jo uoTq,-e.a-edazd
quq Bu Tina aadox3uS jo �4TO auq uT Pu-eq uTe4,aaO jo �uGwdoTanaG
auk uo wnT.zo4-e.aoN y 2uTsodwl aou-euTpsO wlJG4ul uV `VST '0N 'PuO [-e
• sao -e 0 pu*e su-oT4nTosGE [TT
suoT4TpuoO fauafJGwg ,zapun aou�egsTSs d mous 10- 1 U00 n#
sasuaq w.z-e3 [n#
uolgTppV puZ a,zunbS ezuTd �jn4uao .zoj quawaa.aj3V siadoTanaQ [4#
s4uawas-eg anuanV g4ano3 [s*
uoT4TPPV P-ITuy s ,,zan-eH [ z#
$ulou-euT3 4uawa.zaul Xul
;.zoddnS 04 40aCOJd ( OEHVH) sT-eToTJJO ouawdoTanapaU puU fuTsnoH
jo u014sToossy TL�uoT4-eN PUU (DWq) saT4TO 'ubs jo an2-ea7 quTor [b
S4uawanoidwl 4uawaonTdaE GBPTJ9 pul TOT 'H-I JOJ Duawaa,12V
(IOQ/uyj) uoTqu4iodsuu,zl jo 4 , daQ •uX puL aado>reu, jo FOTO GqL [d
TuuoT4uwdOJul - T6/OS/9 00. G9/i/G wOJJ sBuT4q-G I
40uJ uoO JOJ aTnPGgDS ureJ20dd )IJOM IOQ u4OsGulJTI4 Jo sn4-e4S [o
:panuTquoo 33-e45 wodi s4.zodaE [OT
S66T ` 6T sagwanoN
VQNaDV aAIIKINHI
TENTATIVE AGENDA
Housing Authority in and for the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota
Special Session November 19 , 1985
Chairperson Vierling presiding
1. Roll Call at 7 : 00 P.M.
2 . Accept Special Meeting Call
3 . Approve the Minutes of October 1, 1985 .
4. Conduct neighborhood meeting (with City Council in attendance )
for Housing Alliance Senior Housing Project in Block 32 ,
Shakopee Plat. (Depot Place )
a. Presentation by Housing Alliance
b. Questions by HRA and Council
C. Comments and questions from public
5 . 85-26 A Resolution Amending the Minnesota River Valley
Redevelopment Plan and Creating a New Tax Increment District
and Financial Plan.
6 . Other Business
a.
b.
7 . Adjourn
Jeanne Andre
Executive Director
Shakopee HRA
PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 1, 1985
Chrm. Vierling called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. with Comm. Lebens,
Wampach, Colligan and Leroux present. Also present were Jeanne Andre,
HRA Director; John K. Anderson, City Admr. ; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk;
Julius A. Coller, II, City Attorney and Mayor Reinke.
Colligan/Wampach moved to approve the minutes of August 13, 1985 and
August 20, 1985 as kept. Motion carried unanimously.
Leroux/Wampach offered Resolution No. 85-24, A Resolution Adopting A
General Fund Budget for 1986, and moved its adoption. Motion carried
unanimously.
Leroux/Colligan offered Resolution No. 85-25, A Resolution Requesting the
Shakopee City Council to Consent to the Levy of a Special Tax by the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Shakopee, and
moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously.
The HRA Director explained some background on the Rental Rehabilitation
Grant Program and the City's contract with the Scott County HRA for
joint administration. She said the City entered into the program with
the understanding of helping smaller properties downtown. Now, however,
a large apartment complex outside of downtown is interested in partici-
pating in the program, which poses administration problems. She asked
whether or not the HRA would like to include properties outside downtown,
and if so, then further authorizations are needed for additional staffing
and expenditures of time and money.
Considerable discussion ensued regarding the availability and advisability
of using the program to help rental properties outside of the downtown
area. The HRA Director pointed out the main difference in staff time
for larger complex is the individual interviews to determine Section 8
eligibility. She clarified that the administration of the program is
covered by the grant, so it would just be an in-and-out expense.
Leroux/Lebens moved to approve expansion of the Rental Rehabilitation
Grant Program to include units of 5 or more apartments located outside
the downtown area. However, the HRA Director is directed to set up a
time limit for applications for the program, with priority given to those
units in the downtown area. The HRA Director is also authorized to expend
funds for additional staffing as necessary, as long as those funds are
covered by the program. Motion carried unanimously.
Colligan/Wampach moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting
adjourned at 7:25 p.m.
Jeanne Andre
HRA Director
Diane S. Beuch
Recording Secretary
TO: Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA)
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director
RE: Tax-Increment Financing for Housing Alliance Senior
Housing
DATE: November 15 , 1985
Introduction:
At its November 6 , 1985 , meeting the City Council expressed
an interest in continuing to work with the Housing Alliance
to go through the necessary approval processes in 1985 that
would make construction of the project in 1986 a possibility.
A summary of the steps taken to date and those to occur in the
near future follows.
Background:
In November of 1984 the Housing Alliance submitted basic
information for City determination of whether their project
was suitable tax increment assistance. Findings at that time
included:
1) The project is in accord with the downtown concept
plan and could be a positive first step in promoting
downtown redevelopment.
2 ) Increments from the project would support the requested
assistance.
3 ) Storm sewer improvements should be undertaken prior
to or in conjunction with this project.
4 ) A conditional use permit is necessary for construction
of multi family housing in a B-3 zone.
5 ) Upon submission of the formal application fee the
HRA should undertake an appraisal of the property
to be acquired to substantiate the acquisition price.
The Housing Alliance has since submitted the attached formal
application for tax-increment assistance and the necessary $500
fee. This proposal has been further refined to include 44 senior
housing units with underground parking and commercial space
(beauty salon and restaurant) with at-grade parking.
The next step in the process is a public meeting to hear
neighborhood concerns about the project. The neighborhood meeting
has been scheduled at the beginning of the November 19 , 1985 ,
HRA meeting. Following this meeting the HRA will start the
formal tax-increment process through the adoption of a redevelopment
plan and referring the plan to the Council, Planning Commission,
Scott County and the School District for review.
The Housing Alliance request for assistance now totals
approximately $667 , 500 , as detailed in their proposal. This
amount is significantly above that previously requested and
should be given thorough analysis by a negotiating team. It
is recommended that a team with the Assistant City Attorney,
a Council/HRA member, staff member and bond counsel should be
established to review the request and either scale it back or
request an equity position in the project to justify the city
expenditure.
Financial analysis by Springsted, Inc. demonstrates that
the full request can be supported with the creation of a housing
tax-increment district of about 15 years duration, with a bond
issue of $ 720, 000 , including capitalized interest and issuance
costs. The term of the district could in fact be extended to
20 years to provide for an additional $126 , 000 (net) that could
be used for the 75% City match for downtown streetscape improvements.
This would not allow for the 40/60% split recommended in the
downtown plan for private vs. public expenditures.
The Assistant City Attorney has recommended, with bond
counsel concurrence, that the HRA adopt a redevelopment plan
that includes the full Housing Alliance request. The negotiating
team will then negotiate a draft of the redevelopment contract
with the developer prior to the Council public hearing on the
district and the plan and the actual sale of bonds. The plan
would therefore allow for expenditures which the HRA and City
Council could subsequently chose not to expend when the redevelopment
contract is authorized.
Concurrently with the tax-increment process the City and
the developer will be proceeding with the necessary steps for
planning approvals and issuance of mortgage revenue bonds.
Requested Action:
1. Hold neighborhood meeting with Housing Alliance presentation
on the project and opportunity to hear neighbor' s concerns.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 85-26 , A Resolution Amending the Minnesota
River Valley Redevelopment Plan and Creating a New Tax
Increment District and Financial Plan.
3 . Establish a negotiating team to negotiate a draft redevelopment
agreement with the Housing Alliance.
SPRINGSTED =�
INCORPORATED
PUBLIC FINANCE -
ADVISORS
15 November 1985
Ms. Jeanne Andre
Director of Community Development
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
RE: Housing Alliance Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District
Dear Jeanne:
We have prepared the enclosed two schedules per your request of November 13.
Both schedules relate to a tax increment financing project for a redevelopment
project proposed by the Housing Alliance Corporation. These schedules were
developed based on the following information supplied by the City:
a) Project Budget
Acquisition $360,000
Relocation 15,000
Demolition 30,000
Public Improvements 118,000
SAC & WAC 34,500
Subtotal 557,500
Engineering -
Legal 3,000
Planning 1 ,000
City Administration 4,000
Contingencies 5,000
Subtotal 570,500
To this we have added:
Bond Issuance 17,800
Discount (1.5%) 10,800
Capitalized Interest (26 months) 120,900
Bond issue $720,000
b) Increment Income Estimate
Captured Assessed Value (1/2/87) $884,000
Mill Rate 117 Mills
From which we calculated:
Annual Increment Income $103,428
800 Osborn Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 (612) 222-4241
250 North Sunnyslope Road, Brookfield,Wisconsin 53005 (414) 782-8222
Ms. Jeanne Andre, Director
15 November 1985
Page 2
Your request was for two schedules: The first with the district's increment just
supporting this project's budget; and the second being a determination of
maximum issue size given this level of increment incorne. Both schedules have
a bond issue date of December I, 1985 with principal maturing on February 1.
Schedule A reflects your first request and demonstrates the issue for the
Housing Alliance Project can be fully retired by increment income from the
district over a 15-year period with a slight surplus generated each year.
Schedule B shows a 20-year issue with increment collected through 2005 and
yielding a maximum bond issue at $890,000. This bond issue would provide the
City with the following resources:
Total Issue $ 890,000
Less: Capitalized Interest (161 ,980)
Less: Discount ( 13,350)
Less: Bond Issuance ( 17,800)
Net Available $ 696,870
The net available in Schedule A is $570,500, from which the comparable figure
in Schedule B is an increase of $126,300.
1 trust this fully responds to your request. Should you have any questions or
require any additional information, please feel free to contact us.
Respectfully,
i
David N. MacGillivray
Senior Finance Analyst
Enclosures
/kat
00000000000000 o SCHEDULE
a �
O � O
Z W --i
W
> m lO fn I-I Ln�cOC
rl (N r1 --1 .--1 M m m N N N
m O In ri In --I M lD C0 LO
-
a D: N m rl Ln
O O .-I-iNNMMCCtnLn
O p Cl >
U W O W
N Q1 a
Fy -M
a OW
_ Q N >
\F OOm MmrnmrMLn 'c-SCC C ESO
aLo ry Mmm r- 0>NLnMImm0 N CL
RCO Um 00 Ln Ln M ID NNr Ln IO to a w O
c a - m - - - - - - - U o a
Z CL lu o.N l0 In C C C C Ln .-I N Cxr
za w L„ F
< cp v> wCnF
Ln
co O a E
m p a W W
rnw UEC
E z z W
E-
0 Z OOm mmmmmmmmmmm l0
04 W W OON NNN NNNNNNNN M
m C C C C C C C C C C C C O
rzO w Or
U Ln Ln fn MM rI MMMMM r) MM N
Z U Z 1O LnOOooOcocoo o0 Lfl
-� .-a r�ri rl .-1-1 -1 -A.-1 r4 --I M
w `i Ln o Ln
> p --i O -�
O W v)- m m t0
Z F
LO N O M
p z M -aC
_ Ln ar Ln
000 Ln 0M O -4tn M <rrsrsr N (h v}
x a 7.1 0�o O O M M M-4 to M O r M m M N -A
> Ln -i m Ln M M M m O m -4 -4 LO m m C
a Cn w 0 �D
W -Z -- Ln Ln0 rmO lD mm m Clm r --+ C1
x LDtnO m m 0 rnrnrn mmarnrnO 0
a m -i 4 , E
� F
LO
v> U E O
0 U
E +
Cn E E-
W
W W Cn
C O o Cl C M m M 0 O M m Ln Ln Ln = a w
a C O O O C-4 M l0 O Ln -4 m r r -4 WLn CL Gy
F .--I m m r `C C Ol rl O� m F
Z E-
n Ln N r E Z
W F lD Ln C1 01 Ol rn O\ Ol 01 O1 Q\ 01 Ln Z r+
N a O
0 moa
yr z Cn E-
Z
Z H O
Cn� C pF
F OCO OCMmm C> 0Mm 0 L Ln
okoa Cn coo OO--I MlDoto -4mrr r-I
O
Inm m r tD r-1 N "1
M--I C1 rl O1 m
p Gc
r z W Ln Ln Ln N D\LO NmC O1C w 10 N
Ln Z F 1D to Ln U'tCCCMMNN --1 -4 M
m rrSz Ln
Ln Ln oW
rLnr
Ztn m O
F O W
O r-1 H D
Cn E-
W <
W < w < 0 0 0 0 c 0 C. 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 Cl
z u Cn - CL o 00000000000 Cl
Z 1"'1 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
a U M
E 07 tH an z 0 000 C)lnotnotnoo 0
O p m «, d �rc00mm �Dr- rmm N
z m CL r
w a O 1-4 a ur r
W c \ F E-
--4
O W E-
C CG
Z z \\ p
/. W w NN W .. Ea
Z u £ rmM 0 --IN MC Ln ID r m CSO
Cn W ON mmm m m m m C1mmm C1 m
o a E �- rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn o � z
Cu O U •• � -� --1 r-I .� r-i.--1 -i -�-+ r-I --I --I -� N .. W W z
0 0 z W Cn NC7 �
�+ O w O r mm O .-+ NMC Ln lO rm
F N X F F > r mmm E-
z W C7
- r- < < 4 kW -- m M M MMCF rna',mmM M O O »
U v}F 0 = a --1--1-- --I 1 --I --I •-I--I 1-1 --1 --I --1 F m < <
00000000000000000000 C SCHEDULE
V}
a
ar --
0 > 0
z w .-4
Z a -
t.0
w
r!) O O O V' M IN t` M U lD V' r- V' (N N Ln N M
�... 0 M[- NNr- N 111N l� in�r` •4t!'1 MQ\ mm m
Fa Q MOlDmtf Nm � V'r 01 �D 'T �D m � V,
d Q> . . . . .
as MCF (� �Dmm -1.-40M010 .-1NMU) '\Y' a,
O O .-I .4 .-1 r( .-I .--I r-1
U) 0 O >
O W m W
U N rn a
H CZ
ar+ w
Fc �D >
I I I I I I F r+ O
\G-i 000 V inm0CMON r-cr- mOMr- m �1 M �r V?
a V) M c r 01 Ln Ln Mr, Ln .4.-i MM CO 1.0m M O 00 04
oU - 0 V ID MNMr- Ln ml- r+ rr� N� �Or- V UOCZ
N N N ra N M 1-1
Z rZ W W M E-
GL
m o U F x
01 w z z w
a
F
0
c O Z
O O m m m m m O m m m m m co m m m m m 00 V'
r-I W W W N m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m
N f� V' V' V' V'V' V' V'V' V'V'V' V' V' V' V'V' V' cT lD
M M M M M M M M M M('C1 M M M M M M ('I M
co Z U Z m r- O o 000000000000000 CO N
Z .. ri rl ri• r r r r .� r r r �� O
w
000
> Q V) O Lf) If1
O W o M M
Z F tD M Q1
U1 M rl V'
C7 O V}O
C] Z
w �y O O m V` 01 V'CO N LI N O -4 N -4 O m (n rl U) 01 rl
N 1 in w r- N r- m 01 tf1 m -a V' 0101 d' lD V' N CV O
Q,' W > Uf1 N r v rn r- m lD m (n lD rl N lD l0 .-1 N .--I rl N V} V)-
to
}U] W 0 1D
r-V' inNOMrd MON V' O r- NNNNr1 tf1 CO V'
00 r, ino 0000000000000000 r
a4 ft7 rl rl 1-4.-1 -4
rn F
v� U f O
0 U
F -
U) E F
w w m
00000000000000000000 0 aw
.� N 1D \D m m m lD V' O\D O N V' N O iD O N N (D O W d a
r„^ .. Nrlr-00100M00010110mO V' 00r- m .:r in O E- --'W
W F (f1 Z E-
0 —
O -- rrV V mc) m DcoLr) rrnlnNr- rrrrrrl0o (N FZ
W F mr- 01all 0) in0101 in0101in001 in in0101 OO N Z .-i
a r( .-4 in a o
M0a
J 0 U
W V} Z U) F
Z i-+ O
U Q 0E-
E+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
wo a M N 1.0 lO m m m%D V' Cl iD O N V' N 0 10 O N N oo O
C) R.^ W Nr- r-O a) mMmcy�01 lD m0 V' m r� MV' riin O
V' ZwrcV' M Om ID M Ori V' O r- Nr- Nr-rl (f1 I- lD
U1 • ZF 00 r- r r- r- iD lO ID lD U1 Ul L(1 V' V• MM N N ri M
m m 4 z
in
r
M Dow
V} M mm
co M O
M (n
F O W N .--I
O H H
ri m
Lo E-
w w w < O C) 0 0 0 C)O O O O O O O C) C) C) O O O 0
zuLo a 00000000000000CD00o O
Z 1-1 000000000000000000 0
E rn to (n Z C c (n (n o Lj L� (n (n C In C (n rn In C
O D m N N N N M M M M V' V' V' L(1 U'1 l0 l0 r-rh m 01 01
Z in a 0:)
..
W a O rI W V)-
>+ W
W
CQ
\ FF
CL 5 rl ri H Q'
0wE. xx
� zz \\ 0
•• Fa
,'�, (•J .-i a r` 0001 C:) -4 N MV' L(1 tD r CO 0l O rl N M'q' Lf) lD U) <
U] W O N m CO m 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 in O1 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z E 0
O m F 01 01 O\ 01 in 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iC Z
[v O U ic." r-I rl r✓ -i 1-1 r4 ri .-I rl .-i '-i.--I 4 N N N N N N N •• w W Z
O o Z W V) r C7
,H ox a a
r o w 0 > .-- (n .Drmrno -INMvrrn jormrno Nr,
F o1 x F F > r+ m m m m m o1 01 01 D1 m 01 01 m 01 Q1 o C)O C) 0 F Z w C7
.. CO < rt fC w 01 01 01 rn 01 C1 01 01 01 o1 01 01 c1 01 01 0 0 0 0 o O O >>
U V)- F D .] r r r-4 l .-I r4 4 .-1 4 rl.4 r♦ '--1 1-1 N N N N N E. <
PROJECT PROFILE
City Block Number: 32
Current Site Ownership: Tom Gestach (formerly Marg Abeln)
Jerry Wampach
City of Shakopee (alley)
Approx. Total Site Area: 1.03 acres
Number of Units and Size: 26 One Bedroom Units (625 sf)
18 Two Bedroom Units (800 sf)
44 Units
Number of Floors: 3 Floors with Gable Roof
Covered Parking Spaces: 44 Spaces (below grade)
Retail Space Use: Restaurant 4,200 sq ft
Beauty Shop 625 sq ft
Care & Management: Under Negotiation with St Francis Hospital
Zoning: B3
Building Height (est.) 44 ft (Code Permits 45 ft)
Density Restrictions: none
Setback Requirements: none
Special Use Permit: Multi-family Housing
Vacation Application: Alley in block 32
This development proposal is a draft copy only and the development team
reserves the right to change, substitute, eliminate, or modify the contents as
described herein that in their determination may be required.
CITE' OF SHAICOI'f;c.
APPLICATION
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ASSISTANCE, nL
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Legal name of applicant : Housing Alliance, Inc.
Address : 200 Butler North, 510 First Avenue North, Minneapolis, MN 55403
Telephone number: 339-6122
Name of contact person: Larry Smith, Vice President
DISTRICT INFORMATION
Addendums shall be attached hereto addressing in detail :
1 . Location - include a location map with exact boundaries of
projected development as proposed.
2 . Size - describe the size of the proposed project in terms of
acres . Show parcel boundaries , if known.
3 . Use - describe the proposed uses for the property, by parcel ,
if known.
4. Value - list the estimated market .value to result from the
project by year and by parcel , by building or other appropriate
spatial subdivision.
5 . Timing - describe the timing; of the development improvements .
6 . Interest Rate Reduction Program - identify the level of interest
rate reduction proposed and how much of it will. be financed
by the developer and how much by the use of tax increment
financinb.
7 . Impact - to the extent feasible , identify :
a . Temporary construction jobs to be created .
b. Valuation to be added.
C . Impact on current housing market and local developer/builders
d . Impact on the city ' s housing stock as it relates to the city' s
Housing Assistance Plan.
e. Other assets to accrue to the community.
8. Traffic - to the extent feasible , identify:
a . Projected vehicle counts caused by development of
_ the district .
b. Impact on existing traffic arteries .
C . Plan for traffic flow.
9 . Need - explain why the improvement is not one that would
normally be financed by the private developer and why the
costs of the improvement cannot be paid by the applicant .
OTHER INFORMATION
Provide any further information you feel may assist the City in assess-
ing the merits of this proposal .
NArk
`f IRL Iii)usinci"'A111 r,cc
ADDENDUM - TAX INCREMENT APPLICATION
THE HOUSING ALLIANCE, INC.
1. LOCATION - see attached map.
2. SIZE - The size of the proposed project is 1.03 acres of land (see
attached map).
3. USE - 44 units of market rate rental housing for seniors.
4. VALUE - $3,340,000.00 total land and buildings.
5. TIMING - Construction start, Spring 1986. Construction completion,
Spring 1987.
6. INTEREST RATE REDUCTION PROGRAM - See attached proforma under
"Financing".
7. IMPACT
7a. 40 to 50 jobs for 1/2 year
7b. $3,015,000.00
7c. In 1983 the City of Shakopee was designated by the
Metropolitan Council as a community in need of addtional multi
family housing and senior housing (report available from Metro
Council). The Housing Alliance has worked closely with local
developers and builders and kept them informed of the proposed
project. With the completion of the race track there is a
greater need for roll over housing. See enclosed market study.
7d. The development will give young people in the community the
opportunity to buy a home and will allow older persons to
remain more independent and to live with dignity in their own
community because of the services and health care that will be
provided to them in the housing development.
7e. Development of this site is particularly beneficial to the city
because it will provide the community's senior citizens with a
home as they require relief from the burdens often associated
with housing, i.e. snow removal, maintainance, lawn care and
auto upkeep. Its site permits them to be close to many
amenities without the requirement of an automobile.
Improvement of the site also represents a first step in a
downtown redevelopment and may initiate increased revenue to
the city that will permit the city to proceed with addtional
street and other improvements.
8. TRAFFIC - Traffic patterns are expected to have little impact on
existing traffic counts and patterns due to the unstructured and
infrequent pattern of vehicular traffic generated by retired seniors.
Traffic flow should remain unchanged.
9. NEED - With the severe reduction in Section 8 and 202 :funding it is
important for the Housing Alliance as the developer to keep the land
costs as low as possible. This cost reduction is passed on directly to
the residents through reduced monthly rentals. The attached
feasibility study substantiates the need for keeping monthly costs as
low as possible. If the full cost of the land is borne by the Housing
Alliance the monthly rental costs will be prohibitive to many,i,iicr N,_u,tlt L,iildiiig.Suite 2u(_)
Shakopee seniors, and will make the development unfeasible. :,1u Fiat_\�enuc �urtl
Minnenludis.Mimiusom 5.540:3
T(dephoiw 61_'.:3:39.6122
A'
;. \'S Y
0 u—
co
At
cy
i I v y.•�'� .i,1 1
- .031 �,.,t--^ ��rutc^� Ian .• .,.
C7
C[5 `1CD
1 3 514 il•O M _ •
i J 1 lr•t� ��'1�-n• l 0
J it 06'
II1
'n
1'CL
4_`�
. • _fps �•k;i:;
(P� O HOUSING
10
t t yA- Ar
+^p cr-
MICHAEL J.DOHERTY 11882-19731 DO H E RTY, RUMBLE & BUTLER EDWARD F.FOX
WILFRID E.RUMBLE(1891-19711 RICHARD B.PETERSON
PIERCE BUTLER,JR.11893-19571 PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION i ^` JONATHAN P.SCOLL
J.C.FOO TE .I, 1 � � JOHN E.VUKE LICH
IRVING CLARK TERENCE P.DURKIN_
FRANK CLAYBOURNE ATTORNEYS AT LAW ELIZABETH HOENE
JOHN L.HANNAFORD MARY E.PROBST
PERRY M.WILSON,JR. 3750 IDS TOWER .. ... LISA M.HURWITZ
Jr
HALLORAN '�T' .. KAREEN R.ECKLUND
HENRY D.FLASCH �•! �"r ,=DAVID M.CREMONS
EUGENE M.WARLICH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 SUE ANN NELSON
JAMES K.WITTENBERG BRENT D.BOSTROM
JOHN J.MSGIRL,JR. TELEPHONE 16121 340-5555 ANN AS F. N
THOMAS E.ROHR ICHT THOMAS FE-PARK ENANT
BO YD H.RATCHYE LORI WIES E-PARKS
RALPH K.MORRIS TELEX 290-635 DONALD S.MSCAULEY
BRUCE E.HANSON JEFFREY A.REDMON
J.LAWRENCE MCINTYRE WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER CYNTHIA SWANS
EFORD
RICHARD A.WILHOIT DAVID D SWANSON
WILLIAM J.COSGRIFF 340-5594 RONALD D.MSFALL
ROBERT P.
JAMES A.STOLPESTAD N
SUSAN C.WEI EINGARARTNER
RUSSELL C.BROWN SAINT PAUL OFFICE
PATRICK GARRY
STEPHEN E.SMITH
TONIA T.KITTELSON
GARY L.GANDRUD 1500 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ERIN K.JORDAHL
JAMES J.RYAN
RONALD A.ZAMAN SKY SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 MA DAWNN L MANERSCHEIDE
DEAN R.EDSTROM L.W.NILES
C.ROBERT BEATTIE TELEPHONE 1612) 291-9333 DONALD GENA M.SETZERZER
DAVID G.MARTIN
TIMOTHY R.O UINN MARTHA CLARK
ALAN I.SILVER JANIS M.CLAY
JAMES R.CRA5SWELLER
JOHN A.YILEK INCLUDING MEMBERS OF THE FORMER FIRM OF
JEFFREY B.OBERMAN
GREGORY A.KVAM STOLPESTAD, BROWN & SMITH OF COUNSEL
DANIEL W.O'BRIEN
PENELOPE A.HUNT
PHILIP L.ERICKSON PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION WILLIAM F RRELL L
FRANK 5.FA RRELL
WILLIAM L.SIPPEL
KIMBALL J.DEVOY November 13, 1985 RICHARD H.MAGNUSON
GARY LL J.HANSENDE GEORGE C.KING
CARL A.SWENSON
DAVID P.DYSON
DELIVERY BY MESSENGER
Ms. Jean Andre
Community Development Director
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re: Housing Alliance Proposed Redevelopment of Lots 4,
5, 6 and 7, Block 32, City of Shakopee
Dear Ms. Andre:
We are counsel to the Housing Alliance. This letter
will confirm our conversations with you to the effect that the
Housing Alliance, as the proposed redeveloper of Lots 4, 5, 6 and
7, Block 32, City of Shakopee, the parcels bounded on the north
by Second Avenue , on the south by Third Avenue and on the east by
Fuller Street in Shakopee.
As we have indicated, the Housing Alliance proposes to
develop on Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7 a residential rental project
containing 44 units of housing in a 3-story wood frame structure
to be constructed over a concrete type 1 below-grade parking area
containing 44 parking spaces. In addition, the structure is
proposed to contain a commercial component of approximately 5,125
gross square feet on the first-floor level, consisting of a
public restaurant to be leased by the redeveloper of about 4,200
square feet, a leased beauty shop/salon of approximately 625
square feet and public toilet of 300 square feet. The
redeveloper ' s estimate of the fair market value of the entire
project upon completion is $3 ,340,000. 00 , based upon construction
cost including a 10% developer overhead and profit, normal
financing and interest costs and costs to achieve initial
occupancy or rent-up.
DOHERTY, RUMBLE & BUTLER
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
Ms. Jean Andre
November 13 , 1985
Page 2
In the event that the City Council of Shakopee elects
not to approve the restaurant and commercial use of the redevel-
opment, the redeveloper will request, in the alternative, that
the space occupied thereby will be developed with 8 additional
rental housing units.
As part of the contemplated redevelopment, it is
proposed that the City of Shakopee acquire adjoining property on
Second Avenue, popularly known as the "Jack ' s Bar" and described
as Lot 8 and the East 38 feet of Lot 9, Block 32, City of
Shakopee, demolish the existing improvements and construct there-
on an asphalt parking lot.
It is our understanding that the described improvements,
both public and private, are located within an existing tax
increment financing redevelopment district. The redeveloper
hereby requests of the City of Shakopee and,/ori its Housing and
Redevelopment Authority, as appropriate , tax increment financing
assistance for the described redevelopment of the following
nature and estimated public cost:
Acquisition of site of redevelopment $250,000
project, Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7, Block 32
and write-down to $1. 00.
Acquisition of Jack' s Bar , Lot 8 and $110,000
East 38 feet of Lot 9, Block 32, for
public parking lot.
Relocation costs, Jack' s Bar parcel. $ 15,000
Streetscape improvements. $ 40,000
Electrical utility relocation. $ 70,000
Sanitary sewer improvements. $ 5,000
Storm sewer improvements. $ 3,000
Demolition work, Jack' s Bar parcel. $ 30,000
SAC and WAC.
$ 34,500
TOTAL PUBLIC EXPENSE $557,500
In addition, the redeveloper would request assistance to
finance or pay premiums for insurance or other security required
DOHERTY, BUMBLE & BUTLER
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
Ms. Jean Andre
November 13 , 1985
Page 3
under housing revenue bonds to be obtained by the redeveloper
under Chapter 462C, as authorized under Minn. Stats. Section
273. 75, subd. 4, in an amount estimated as not in excess of
$100 ,000, if feasible.
The foregoing public costs do not, of course, include
planning expenses, legal and engineering fees , bond costs, admin-
istration, capitalized interest or any contingencies.
Please advise me at once if you need any further infor-
mation to begin the tax increment financing plan. Thank you for
all of your assistance.
Sincerely,
DOH TY, RUMBLE & BUTLER
Pr f ssional Association
J athan P. Sc
JPSltr69/kad
cc: Mr. Robert Pulscher , Springsted, Inc. (BY MESSENGER)
Mr. Larry Smith, Housing Alliance
Mr. Brad Johnson, Housing Alliance
Stefanie Galey, Esq. , Holmes & Graven
RTWOOB STREET
F--------------------------------
............................. .........
--------7-----------
----------------------------------
............. .............. ........ .................................
........................ -------------------------------------------
-----------------
. ................................................ --------------------------------
L........-----------
.............................. .......................... .....................
............................................................... -------
................... -- -------------
----------
-- --------
M
LFMT .T............................ z
-------------------------------------------
z
... ..... ...... ..... ..... ..
------------------- ---- ................... .......... ..... ....
.......... ...........................
E
y LMIMAYATED
STOP STOR
............ ............ ..... ....
----- --------- ... ... ------------- .... I
.... ............ ----------
-L-------- .... ---- --- --- it
STO
FULLER STREET
IK
PM Z Qa
o em mg
m FM
r R1
FM
QC Z rm
m
00
FM
"9
RTUJOOD STREET
--------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------
------------------------------
........................
-----------...................
------------------------
..................... .............................................................. ....................................................................................
.............
..............................................
........................... ........................ ..................... ...... ...........-.......................................................................
------------------
.. ........
rm
C-3
------------------ ------------------ z
-------------------
-------------------
---------------
......................................
I----F
----------
...........
--------------------
N V
30
T EP
PORCH
AMP
FULLER STREET
O IA
rm
T =
LN
tw
0Z
A � z z
0 PM
4
m
to
pm
m
Z
rm
T
CNz
--q Z
PM
M
F-
flTUJOOD STREET
---------------------------- ......---------
------------------------------
--------------------------
------------------------------:
-----------------------------------------------
..............
................................................................................
............ .............................................................
...............................................
--------------------------------
-----------------
................................................................................. ............................................................ .......................
------ ---------T----
TI ----
------------------
cm
.................. ..................
C2
cn
---------------------------------------
.... ..... .....
E
WX
A 70 XD 70 70 70 A
..........
FULLER STREET
pm
PM
pri
XP"
H
Z
rm mg
ca
mg
M9
Z
F49
R9
Z
Z
>
M9
M
f-
RTWOOD STREET
.................................................................................... ....................................... ................................... ........
....................................
----------- .................................................
----------------------
(A
-------------------------------------
.................................................................................... ....9*"*'*"*... .......... ........... ....
-..............•..____.-......_.....
L:
................ ZO
................................... ------ .......
C. Z opt C,
m 4n
....................
...................................I I
......................................P .............. ...
...........
... . ............................... ..................................... ..................... .............
-----------
*�v------- ............
............................
O.
§M@P OFF
IA, FULLER STREET
41)
pt
r)
rm Mq
M
M9
M9
r- M
0 Z
10 m
:M
T
rm
r O 0
� C �
N
Z
rn F4I
11
■
O it
Z � I
FM
r"
04
a
I HI
�!!ilr;il
i
i nll
II I
,I� IIII
I HE
L� Z)
z m
a -c
_ C
c ✓
ST. FRANCIS (612) 445-2322
REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 325 West Fifth Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
November 19, 1985
HAND DELIVERED
Mr. Eldon Reinke, Mayor
City of Shakopee
129 - 1st Avenue East
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Eldon:
Since other commitments prevent me from being here in person, I make
my support of this project known in writing.
The Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the Shakopee
City Council are considering tonight whether to provide financing through
the use of tax increment for a 44-unit multi-family housing project for
senior citizens proposed by the Housing Alliance in Shakopee on the west side
of Fuller Street between 2nd and 3rd Avenues. For the last year I have
served on the Steering Committee that was considering the benefits of having
a multi-family housing project for the elderly on this site. The project is
innovative and is in response to a very definite need in this community. I
believe that this project is certainly worthy of our support and cooperation.
I support this endeavor and hope that you can also see great value in
providing this housing project for the Shakopee community.
Sincerely,
Sr. gnes Otti
President and CEO
SAO/llb
cc: Mrs. Delores Lebens
Mrs. Gloria Vierling
Mr. John Leroux
Mr. Dean Colligan
Mr. Jerome Wampach
IYOV 61985
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
November 5, 1985
Honorable Mayor Eldon Reinke
Honorable Councilpersons
129 1st Ave. E.
Shakoee, Mme. 55379
Dear Mayor & Councilpersons:
It is with deep regret that I submit my resignation as Chairman and
Member of the Industrial Commerce Commission. It has been my
priviledge to work for the City in the area of promoting and retaining
industry and commerce.
The members of the ICC have done an excellent job to uphold the
principles this commission was charged to perform.
Due to increased workload, I will no longer be able to keep up
the pace I have been keeping; thus, not giving 100% to the Industrial
Commerce Commission. Thank you for allowing me to serve on the
Commission.
Sincerely,
Paul W. Wermerskirchen
Chairman, Industrial Commerce Commission
c.c. John Anderson
Anthony Berens
Jane DuBois
Tim Keane
Al Furrie, Vice Chairman
Jake Manahan
Jim O'Neill
Judy Hughes
Jeanne Andre
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judi Simac , City Planner
RE: Proposed Recreational Vehicle Ordinance
DATE: November 15 , 1985
Introduction:
At their November 7th meeting, the Planning Commission approved
a motion to recommend to the City Council that the Zoning
Ordinance be amended to include a Recreational Vehicle
Ordinance which has been prepared by staff.
Background:
Please find attached the draft Recreational Vehicle Ordinance.
The Ordinance has been prepared because of the increased in-
terest in the development of this type of facility and upon
the advice of the Asst . City Attorney.
The Ordinance proposes recreational vehicle parks as conditional
uses in the B-1 , I-1 and I-2 zoning districts . Maximum density
is 20 sites per acre and an open space area must be designated
in each development . The ordinance also requires compliance
with existing State Health Department regulations .
Action Requested:
Offer a motion to direct staff to prepare an Ordinance to amend
the zoning chapter to include a Recreational Vehicle Ordinance,
as prepared by staff, and move for its adoption.
JS : cah
Attachment
August 30 , 1985
Revised Oct. 24 , 1985
Draft
Proposed Recreational Vehicle Ordinance
I . Definitions:
A. Recreational Vehicle - A vehicular type unit primarily
designed as recreational living quarters for camping, or
travel use, which either has its own motive power, or is
mounted on, or drawn by another vehicle. The basic entities
are: travel trailer, camping trailer, truck camper, and
motor home.
B. Recreational Vehicle Park - A developed area which contains
sites for the temporary location of assorted recreational
vehicles to include travel trailers , motor homes , truck
campers , and to an extent, tents. Such park facilities
cover a range of short overnight stops , to longer destination
- type stays of several days to weeks .
II . Zoning Districts Where Recreation Vehicle Parks may be
established.
A. Highway Business District as a conditional use.
B. Light Industrial District as a conditional use.
C. Heavy Industrial District as a conditional use.
III . Application for Conditional Use Permit.
The following information must be submitted in addition
to the application requirements for a conditional use permit.
A. Total number of acres in the proposed recreational vehicle
park.
B. Acreage and percent of land to be set aside as open space.
C. The type of proposed accessory recreational facilities ,
if applicable.
D. Number of recreational vehicle sites to be incorporated
into the park.-
E.
arkaE. Recreational vehicle site density per acre.
F. Standard or typical recreational vehicle site width and
length.
G. Proposal for phasing development, if applicable.
H. The schedule for construction.
I . Water and sewer services plan.
J. If applicable, in accordance with the Minnesota Environmental
Policy Act of 1973 , the submittal of an Environmental Assessment
Worksheet.
K. Location and width of roadways and walkways.
L. Plan for refuse handling.
M. Parking Plan
N. Type and location of landscaping and screening.
O. Management Plan to include, but not be limited to, hours ,
emergency operation plan, season of operation.
P. Drainage Plan
IV. Lot Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements:
1. Maximum Height: The lesser of two stories or 20 feet.
2. Minimum Lot Area: Two and one-half acres ( 2 1/2 ) except
in zoning districts where the minimum
lot area is greater than 2 1/2 acres;
in which case, the minimum required
lot area shall apply.
3 . Maximum Density: Twenty recreational vehicle sites per
acre, based upon land suitable for developing and
measured from the property lines of the park. The
areas occupied by the manager ' s unit ( s ) , recreational
and social center may not be included in the computation.
4 . Minimum Yard Requirements:
Front yard - 30 feet
Rear yard - 30 feet
Side yards - 20 feet
Interior street front yards - 5 feet
5 . Structure in Required Yards: No principal or accessory
structures shall be placed in any required front,
rear or side yard.
6 . Minimum Lot Width - 100 feet
7. Open Space Requirement: A minimum of 80 of the total area
of the park shall be reserved for the purposes of
open space or recreational uses , such as swimming
pools, tennis courts, ballfields.
Open space areas shall be of sufficient size and location
to be a functional part of the entire development
plan.
V. Permitted Uses:
A. Recreational vehicles
VI . Accessory Uses: To be used solely for the residents of
the park. The accessory uses shall not occupy more
than 100 of the usable park area. They include:
1 . Convenience type retail sales and services, such
as grocery stand, coin operated launderies , dispensing
machines, etc.
2 . Office and utility building.
3 . Shower, Bath and Locker Room Facilities Building
4 . Multi-purpose activity buildings
3
VII . Vehicular Spacing and Access Drives
1. Each recreational vehicle site shall be fifty feet in length,
ten feet wide , and contain a stabilized vehicular parking
pad of crushed rock, bituminous , or other suitable material.
2 . Recreational vehicle sites shall be set back 20 feet from
any building.
3 . Access drives shall be looped within the interior of the
recreational vehicle park. There shall be at least two
established common driveways that intersect with a public
street. There shall be no individual access to a recreational
vehicle site from any public street or alley.
4 . Access drives shall be a minimum of 22 feet wide, provided
to each space, continuous and located at least 10 feet
from property lines. A one-way access drive shall be a
minimum of 12 ft. wide with paved surface.
5 . Access drives shall be paved, maintained in a dust proof
condition and be adequately lighted.
6 . Off-street parking shall be provided for visitors and recre-
ational vehicle park registration. At lease one parking
space for every 10 recreational vehicle sites.
VIII Screening and Landscaping
1. A screening wall or fence or landscaping strip suitable
to provide a visual screening effect along the side and
rear property lines shall be provided.
2 . All open space and setbacks shall be adequately landscaped
to provide a park - like appearance.
3 . Receational vehicle parks should be fitted to the terrain
with a minimum disturbance to the land. Existing trees,
rock formations and other natural site features should
be preserved to the extent possible.
4 . Trees shall be planted within the interior of the recreational
vehicle park, in addition to the existing trees on the
site. The minimum number of trees shall be equal to the
number of recreational vehicle sites proposed. Such trees
shall be of a suitable type and size to provide effective
shade or screening effects within the park site.
IX. Permanent Occupancy Prohibited
1. No recreational vehicle shall be used as a permanent place
of abode, dwelling, or business or for indefinite periods
of time. Continuous occupancy extending beyond three months
in any 12 month period shall be presumed to be permanent
occupancy.
2 . Any action toward removal of wheels of a recreational vehicle
except for temporary purposes of repair or to attach the
vehicle to the grounds for stabilizing purposes is hereby
prohibited.
4
X. Signage
Signage shall be in conformance with Section 4 . 30 of the
Shakopee City Code.
XI . Compliance with the Minnesota State Board of Health, Chapter
Thirteen MHD 187-197 and Chapter 327 ; Sections 327 . 10-
327 . 28 regarding:
1. Water Connections
2. Plumbing
3 . Sewage Disposal
4 . Toilet, Bathing, Laundry Facilities
5. Refuse Handling and Disposal
6 . Insect Control
7 . Community Kitchen and Dining Rooms
8. Fuel oil Supply Systems
9. Barbecue Pits , Fireplaces , Stoves and Incinerators
r'
i
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judi Simac , City Planner
RE: Preliminary Plat Approval of Prairie House
1st Addition*
DATE: November 15 , 1985
*Please refer to the preliminary plat drawing which was included
in the November 6th agenda packet .
Introduction:
At their November 7 , 1985 meeting, the Planning Commission
approved a motion to recommend to the City Council preliminary
plat approval of Prairie House 1st Addition subject to con-
ditions .
Background:
The recommended conditions of approval are as follows :
1 . Approval of a Title Opinion by the City Attorney.
2 . Plat name be changed to Prairie House 1st Addition.
3 . The City Engineer must receive and approve final plans
and specifications for all public facilities including,
but not limited to, roads , sanitary sewer system,
storm sewer and grading.
4. The developer shall provide a recordable agreement
which guarantees the looping of the water system when
Outlot A is replatted.
5. The frontage road shall be constructed to serve all
properties in a manner mutually agreeable to the
City and MnDOT.
6 . The developer shall provide a Recordable Agreement which
describes the shared maintenance, by the lot owners , of
the private lift station.
7 . The developer shall provide a 70 foot recordable ease-
ment which allows for the continuation of the Minnesota
River Valley Trail through the property.
8. The developer shall obtain the necessary permits from the
MnDOT.
9 . Execution of a Developer' s Agreement for the construction
of the required improvements :
a. Water - installation of a water system in accordance
with the requirements of the SPUC Manager.
b. Sanitary Sewer and Storm Water System - to be in-
sta lied in accordance with the requirements of the
Design Criteria and Standard Specifications of the
City of Shakopee.
C . Outlot - outlot A must be replatted prior to any
u er development.
d. Park Dedication - in lieu of land dedication, cash
payment should be made to the park fund at the time
building permits are issued.
e. Streets - and signs to be constructed in accordance
with the requirements of the Design Criteria and
Standard Specifications of the City of Shakopee .
Condition No . 5 addresses the construction of the frontage road.
Although there is no Council authorization to condemn property
for an access via the Valleyfair entrance drive , the Planning
Commission did not want to limit the access to T.H. 101 , nor
impede any possibility of an agreement being worked out between
the property owners . At this time it appears that alternative
no . 2 , direct access from T.H. 101 , will be constructed unless
the owners reach an agreement or the City Council authorizes
condemnation based upon the submittal of cost estimates
and detailed design drawings for the frontage road connection
to the Valleyfair driveway.
Condition No. 6 requires shared maintenance of the lift station.
A private lift station is proposed, which will be located on
private property. Based upon prior Council policy, staff had
recommended that the lift station remain private .
Action Requested:
1 . Delay preliminary plat approval until the cost estimates
and design drawings are prepared for frontage road
alternative no. 1 , (which may result in authorization
for condemnation.
or
2 . Offer a motion to grant preliminary plat approval of
Prairie House 1st Addition, subject to the recommended
conditions .
JS : cah
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Highway 101 Access for Prairie 1st Addition
DATE: November 18 , 1985
Introduction
The City Council had a discussion regarding the two access alter-
natives for the service road serving Prairie 1st Addition at
its last City Council meeting. At that meeting Council indicated
by motion that the developer and Valleyfair should get together
to explore the possibilities of alternative No. 1 which was
a combined access at the signalized intersection in front of
Valleyfair' s entrance. City Council also asked that cost estimates
be obtained.
Problem
Neither the City or the developer has generated the requested
estimates for the improvement of the service road based on alter-
native No. 1 . In addition, no one has costed out the proposed
list of conditions Valleyfair would need to have met before
they would agree to the joint access (see letter attached dated
10/31/85 ) .
The City has two choices. The first choice is to approve the
preliminary plat with access alternative No. 2 onto Highway
101 . The second choice is to require that the developer plat
using alternative No. 1, the joint access at the signalized
intersection. For the City to require alternative No. 1 the
City must make the decision to proceed with condemnation and/or
set a deadline by which it will proceed with condemnation.
According to Assistant City Attorney Rod Krass, the City cannot
take the position of saying it approves alternative No. 1 without
providing the developer a mechanism by which he can proceed
under that alternative. That mechanism is condemnation.
Alternatives
The Council has three alternatives as outlined below:
1. The City can approve the preliminary plat based upon access
alternative No. 2. This alternative would be the most
straight forward for the developer and the City while allowing
the developer to final plat in early December and start
construction. This alternative would leave us with an
access onto Highway 101 that would function much like the
Valleyfair service road access functioned prior to the
signalization of their main entrance. For 12 months out
of the year east bound traffic trying to enter the plat
7 �-
would have to pass the Highway 101 access to the plat traveling
east to the crossing at Blue Lake or Shiely, make a U-turn
and proceed west to the entrance. In addition, all traffic
leaving the plat and wishing to travel east will have to
travel west to the traffic lights and make a U-turn before
heading east. The City just spent $160 , 000 to install
the traffic lights to eliminate this problem on the west
side of the signals and it seems to make little sense to
create the same situation for 12 month traffic on the east
side of the signalized intersection.
2 . The City can make a public decision to condemn the needed
right-of-way at the Valleyfair entrance to construct a
service road access that will comply with Mn/DOT standards.
This alternative would be detrimental to the developer
because of the time required by the condemnation proceedings.
The developer is not interested in this alternative if
it will delay his construction by 90 days. This alternative
would provide crossing traffic at the safest intersection
on Highway 101 between County Road 89 and Marschall Road,
the other two signalized intersections. This alternative
is presently opposed by Valleyfair which believes it will
be damaged if its marquis, parking lot, and traffic lanes
for incoming traffic must be altered. It is not clear
at this time whether or not the City would be required
to bear any of the costs under this alternative or whether
they could be all borne by the developer. In a preliminary
review by the Assistant City Attorney it was his opinion
that the City could condemn the needed right-of-way and
that the developer would be responsible for the cost of
the improvement (whether or not this included damage cost
in moving Valleyfair' s marquis, etc. ) .
3 . The City could make an exception to its platting/developer
agreement process to allow the developer to proceed with
the development and to explore the possibility of service
road alternative No. 1 before actual dollars are spent
on construction of alternative No. 1 or 2. This alternative
would require that the City, under a separate agreement,
allow the developer to begin construction of utilities
and buildings after a preliminary plat approval and before
final plat approval. The City, in such an agreement, would
state clearly that the developer would not be issued a
certificate of occupancy until the proper streets were
completed. In addition the City would require the normal
letter of credit covering 1250 of the construction costs
of the public improvements based upon the highest estimate
of either service road configuration alternative No. 1
or 2 . Finally, the City would include a date such as March
31st by which it would make a commitment to the developer
to have selected alternative No. 1 and acquired the necessary
right-of-way for construction or alternative No. 2 so that
the developer could complete roadway improvements beginning
April 1st. This means that City Council would give a prelimi-
nary indication that it was willing to proceed with condemnation
if necessary and that it was willing to provide some up
front engineering costs to get the necessary estimates
or verify existing estimates for the cost of the two alter-
natives.
Recommendation
The City Planner, City Engineer and I recommend alternative
No. 3 . We have reviewed the alternative with the City Clerk
who administers our developers agreements and with the developer
both of whom believe it is workable. The City Council has indicated
a concern about the impact of alternative No. 1 on Valleyfair
and under a worst case scenario those impacts would be determined
by a condemnation process. At the end of the process the City
could decide to proceed with that alternative or revert to alter-
native No. 2 if alternative No. 1 was too costly.
Using the condemnation authority of the City in this fashion
would not establish a precedent. It was used in this fashion
when the City "encouraged" the hospital and courthouse to build
their present parking lot. The City has also approved a preliminary
and final plat for the Hauer addition which will require that
the developer or the City, the latter through condemnation,
acquire a piece of right-of-way for the construction of 13th
Avenue as located on the approved plat.
Finally, I have had the legal authority questioned reviewed
by the League of Minnesota Cities attorney Stan Pesker and it
is his belief that the City has the authority to use condemnation.
The City used condemnation once before in trying to finalize
roadway configurations when it acquired the property between
the end of Martindale Drive and the proposed subdivision road
in the Sandlewood subdivision.
Action Requested
1 . Move to adopt alternative #3 addressing access alternative
No. 1 and No. 2 for the development of Prairie 1st Addition
preliminary plat. Direct the appropriate City officials
to draft an agreement for Council approval implementing
the conditions stated in alternative No. 3 and directing
the City Engineer and City Building Inspector to prepare
estimates for alternative No. 1 .
2. Offer Resolution No. 01 A Resolution Determining the
Necessity for and Authorizing the Acquisition of Certain
Property by Proceeding Eminent Domain for Purposes of Con-
structing a Roadway, and move its adoption.
JKA/jms
f�;Odm
a7
LL
Family Amusement Park
One Valleyfair Drive, Shakopee, NIN 55379
(612) 445-7600
October 31, 1935
Ms. Judi Simac
City Planner
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379-1376
Dear Ms. Simac:
As you know, Valleyfair has participated in various discussions with
city staff, MN/DOT staff and representatives of Curtis Bradford to discuss
alternative access plans for the Bradford property. Valleyfair recently
learned of the city staff's intent to request City Council approval to com-
mence condemnation to implement the roadway plan as shown on Preliminary
Plat, Alternative 1, dated October 9, 1985. Valleyfair desires to resolve
the access issue without condemnation. However, we are very concerned
about a safe and convenient access to Valleyfair, especially during our
peak hours of operation. Outlined below is a proposal to resolve the issue
which we feel continues our existing access and allows access to the
Bradford property. BRW, a traffic consulting firm, assisted in the engi-
neering preparation of this proposal .
Valleyfair is prepared to give an access easement across Valley Park
Drive for the 58 acre Bradford development; subject, but not limited to,
the following conditions:
* The existing island defining the right turn lane from westbound Hwy.
101 to northbound Valley Park Drive is reduced in size to correspond-
ingly reduce to operating need on the road at no cost to Valleyfair.
* A new sign that presents the same image of the existing marquee is
constructed on Valleyfair property west of Valley Park Drive at no
cost to Valleyfair. The existing marquee would be removed.
* Fix the grade on the existing Valley Park Drive access road at no
cost to Valleyfair.
* Provide new secure closure gates in the area where the relocated
entrance gate is shown on the Preliminary Plat, Alternative 1, at no
cost to Valleyfair.
* Replace any altered landscaping at no cost to Valleyfair.
Ms. Judi Simac
October 31, 1985
Page 2
* Convey a piece of property approximately 50 feet by 1 ,013 feet
located in the northwest corner of the Bradford property at a cost of
$1.00 to Valleyfair.
* A stop sign be located for the westbound traffic on the new frontage
road.
* No roadway construction would occur during Valleyfair operation.
* Pay all consulting and legal fees not to exceed $5,000.00
Valleyfair is also very concerned about the traffic impacts of the
development of the remaining 50 acres in the Bradford development.
Depending upon the specific uses that are developed, significant additional
traffic could result. If traffic operational problems occur at the inter-
section of Valley Park Drive and the new frontage, Valleyfair will not par-
ticipate in the cost of resolving the problem. The most likely solution is
an additional access point to Hwy. 101 as shown on Preliminary Plat,
Alternative 2.
Valleyfair would be willing to meet with you as soon as possible to
discuss this matter.
Sin ely,
Le
Richard L. Kinze
Vice President/General Manager
RLK:dw
cc: Richard Wolsfeld, BRW
John Anderson, City of Shakopee
Frank Claybourne, Doherty, Rumble & Butler
Walt Wittmer, Valleyfair
�v
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND
AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
BY PROCEEDING IN EMINENT DOMAIN FOR
PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTING A ROADWAY
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore determined that
the City of Shakopee should establish frontage road access to
Prairie House Addition, a proposed subdivision near Valley Fair;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Acquisition by the city of the following described
property is necessary for the purpose of providing frontage
road access to the proposed subdivision of Prairie House Addition,
said property described on the attached Exhibit A which is made
a part hereof and incorporated herein by reference.
2 . The city attorney is authorized and directed on behalf
of the city to acquire the real estate above described by the
exercise of the power of eminent domain pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 117 , and is specifically authorized to notify
the owners of intent to take possession pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 117 . 042 . The city attorney is further authorized
to take all actions necessary and desirable to carry out the
purposes of this resolution.
Adopted by the City Council this day of
1985 .
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1985 .
City Attorney
Exhibit A
That part of Section 3 , Township 115 , Range 22 , Scott County,
Minnesota described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the northerly right-of-way
line of State Trunk Highway No. 101 and the North-South
Quarter line of said Section 3 ; thence on an assumed bearing
of North 73 degrees 15 minutes 41 seconds West, along said
northerly right-of-way line, 190 . 00 feet; thence North
16 degrees 44 minutes 19 seconds East, a distance of 125 . 00
feet; thence South 73 degrees 15 minutes 41 seconds East,
parallel with said northerly right-of-way line, 152.72
feet to its intersection with the said North-South Quarter
line; thence South 0 degrees 48 minutes 00 seconds West,
along said Quarter line, 124 . 80 feet to the point of beginning.
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Jeanne Andre , Community Development Director
RE: Sewer Allocation as Related to Canterbury Park
2nd Addition
DATE: November 15 , 1985
Introduction:
At the November 6 , 1985 , City Council meeting sanitary
sewer flow, allocation and the location of the Shakopee urban
service area for sanitary sewer were discussed by Council.
At that time background information on the City' s 1984 Comprehensive
Sewer Plan Amendment was presented as it relates to the proposed
preliminary plat for Centerbury Business Park (to be renamed
Canterbury Park 2nd Addition) . This memo is to expand on that
issue prior to Council consideration of this plat.
Background:
When the racetrack was proposed, 157 acres of the 390 acre
site was outside the Shakopee urban sanitary sewer service area
(MUSA) . In addition, 75 acres were in the moratorium area X,
which was to be a trade-off for possible development in moratorium
area Y. At that time the City would have been unable to issue
building permits for racetrack development outside the MUSA
line, so Metropolitan Council acceptance of an amendment to
the MUSA line was necessary for the development of the racetrack
to occur. An amendment was submitted by the City and accepted
by the Met Council in June of 1984. This amendment was processed
as a minor amendment due to the representation by the City that
this change in the service line would not significantly impact
sewer flow, because total flow from the racetrack would be . 204
mgd, which when applied to the 230 acres in the MUSA and moratorium
area X would provide a flow of 523 gad. Therefore even with
the expansion of the sewer service area, the flow from this
site would not negatively impact the city' s sewer capacity allo-
cation.
The City represented its case to the Metropolitan Council
based on information provided by the racetrack that no additional
racetrack improvements were anticipated for at least 10 years.
However when the racetrack site was established certain "option
property" was identified which could be deeded back to Scottland
for other development. This has now occurred, and is the site
of the Scottland plat. Because hotel and office uses are proposed
for this property, it is clear that additional sewer flow will
be generated beyond what was anticipated from the racetrack
when the comp plan amendment was submitted.
Because the line has been amended I believe the city has
the right to issue building permits in the expanded sewer area
(although this has not been affirmed by the City Attorney) .
The main issue is whether the City will jeopordize its standing
with the Met Council in subsequent negotiations on the sewer
flow and sewer service area if it allows denser development
with more flow now, considering the representations made in
the 1984 amendment.
Alternatives •
1. Remain silent on the issue of the additional flow to be
created in the expanded sewer service area as amended in
1984 .
2 . Seek further analysis of the flow which could be created
by this plat and whether it would warrent further review
of the plat prior to preliminary plat approval.
3 . Seek a legal opinion of the City' s ability to issue additional
building permits , which create additional flow, under the
1984 sanitary sewer amendment.
4. Table the preliminary plat until the city' s sanitary sewage
flow allocation and urban service area for the year 2000
is clarified.
5 . Reject the plat because it provides for increased sewage
flow in the amended area beyond what: was contemplated in
the City' s 1984 Comprehensive Sewer Plan Amendment.
6 . Make Scottland place acres of other land that they
own within the sewer service area in a. moritorium to balance
this unanticipated increase in flow.
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City administrator
FROM: Judi Simac , City Planner
RE: Preliminary and Final Plat Approval of
Canterbury Park 2nd Addition
DATE: November 15 , 1985
Introduction:
At their November 7th meeting the Planning Commission approved
a motion to recommend to the City Council preliminary and
final plat approval of Canterbury Business Park Addition,
subject to conditions . (Please find attached a copy of the
staff report to the Planning Commission, the transportation
report submitted by the developer and plat drawings ) .
Background:
The recommended conditions of approval are as follows :
1 . Name of the plat be changed to Canterbury Park 2nd
Addition.
2 . Approval of Title Opinion by the City Attorney.
3 . Submittal of a traffic study which indicates that the
Twelfth Avenue intersection with Co. Rd. 83 is acceptable.
The name of the street within the plat shall be changed
from 12th Avenue to another suitable name.
4. Approved highway entrance and utility construction
permits to be issued by the County Engineer.
5 . Dedication of twenty foot drainage and utility ease-
ments around the perimeter of the outlots . Outlot B
shall be increased to a 60 foot width.
6 . Determination by the City Council on l
what party will
be responsible for the operation and maintenance it
the lift station. of
7 . Execution of a Recordable Agreement which permits
storm water run - off from the racetrack site to flow
south, across the plat, into the drainage outlet.
8. All buildings shall be constructed at two feet above
the flood level .
9 . Determination by the City Attorney as to whether by-
pass r-o-w should be dedicated in the plat .
10. Execution of a Developer ' s Agreement for the construction
of the required improvements :
a. Tram/Pedestrian Walkways - construction of a walk-
way on eac of w is connects the lot with adjacent
lots and or Canterbury Downs .
b. Water System and electric to be installed in
accordance- wit t e requirements of the SPDC
Utilities Manager.
C. Sanitary Sewer and Storm Water System - to be in-
,,L&Iied in accordance w1un the Design Criteria and
Standard Specifications of the City of Shakopee.
a
d. Outlots - no building permits shall be issued for
Outlots A, B and C until thev are replatted .
e . AsSessmentS - the developer shall agree to the City
Lngineer s method of apportioning the installments
remaining unpaid against the plat and that the
developer waives his right to appealing the apportion-
ment .
f. Parlc Dedication - in lieu of land, cash payment to
be paid at time of building permit issuance .
11 . Should the lift station remain private , execution of a
recordable agreement , binding to each lot , that states
that the owners are responsible for operation and maintenance
of the lift station.
12 . The City Engineer must receive and approve final plans and
specifications for all public facilities including, but
not limited to, roads , sanitary sewer system, storm sewer
and grading.
Condition No. 3 refers to the attached traffic report by
Benshoof and Associates regarding the street in the plat inter-
secting with Co. Rd. 83 . The Planning Commission accepted the
report, however the City Engineer did not have an opportunity
to comment on the report prior to the meeting. I have re-
quested the City Engineer to review the plat and traffic study
in order that he may be able to respond to any Council questions
at the meeting. (The overall plat review was, done by the
Consulting Engineer, who had recommended approval ) .
Condition No. 6 requires the Council to determine what party
shall be responsible for operation and maintenance of the lift
station.
Condition No. 9 required a legal opinion as to whether the by-
pass r-o-w should be dedicated in the plat . The Asst . City
Attorney has determined that the City cannot require the
dedication for a major public facility without compensation.
Staff has previously requested the Council to consider a policy
for sewer allocation in the commercial and industrial areas .
This particular plat is related to the 1984 Comprehensive Sewer
Plan Amendment . The amendment was presented to the Met Council
with the understanding that no additional racetrack improvements
were anticipated in the next ten years . Because that assumption
has changed, does the City need to examine sewer flow and service
area with this plat, which proposes high density commercial
development?
Attached is a separate memo prepared by the Community Develop-
ment director which provides background on the 1984 amendment
and lists several alternatives for consideration by Council .
Staff recommends that the Council make a determination on the
Plan Amendment and how it affects the plat, prior to taking
action on plat. approval .
Action Requested:
1 . City Council to make a determination on how theP tat
is affected by the 1984 Comprehensive Sewer Plan
Amendment . C,
2 . Offer a motion to brant preliminary plat approval
of Canterbury Park 2nd Addition, subject to conditions .
3 . Consider Resolution No. 2474, A Resolution Approving
The Final Plat of Canterbury Park 2nd Addition.
JS : cah
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. 2474
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF
CANTERBURY PARK 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS , The Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee
did approve the Final Plat of Canterbury Park 2nd Addition on
November 7 , 1985 and has recommended its adoption; and
WHEREAS , all notices of hearing have been duly sent and
posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given
an opportunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS , the City Council has been fully advised in all
things .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the Final Plat of Canterbury
Park 2nd Addition, described as follows :
That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9 ,
Township 115 , Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota,
excepting therefrom the South 400 feet of the West
100 feet of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter
lying South, southwesterly and southeasterly of Line
A, described below; and that part of the East Half
of the Northeast Quarter of Section 8 , Township 115 ,
Range 22 , Scott County, Minnesota, lying northerly of
the centerline of County Road No. 16 ; lying South,
southwesterly and southeasterly of Line A, described
below:
Line A: Commencing at the southeast corner of said
Northwest Quarter of Section 9 ; thence on an
assumed bearing of North 1 degree 10 minutes
22 seconds West along the East line of said
Northwest Quarter a distance of 4730. 00 feet to
the point of beginning of the line to be
described; thence South 88 degrees 49 minutes
38 seconds West. a distance of 2572 . 89 feet ;
thence along a tangential curve concave to the
North, having a radius of 1321. 00 feet, a central
angle of 64 degrees 32 minutes 00 seconds , an
arc length of 1487 . 87 feet ; thence South 63
degrees 21 minutes 38 seconds West (not tangent
to said curve) a distance of 200 feet more or
less to the West line of said East Half of the
Northeast Quarter of said Section 8 and there
terminating.
be, and the same hereby is approved and adopted with the require-
ments that :
1 . Name of the plat be changed to Canterbury Park 2nd Ci
Addition.
2 . Approval of Title Opinion by the City Attorney.
3 . Submittal of a traffic study which indicates that the
Twelfth Avenue intersection with Co. Rd. 83 is
acceptable . The name of the street within the plat shall
be changed from 12th Avenue to another suitable name . 115 -
4. Approved highway entrance and utility construction permit§
to be issued by the County Engineer.
5 . Dedication of twenty foot drainage and utility easements
around the perimeter of the outlots . Outlot B shall be
increased to a 60 foot width.
6 . Determination by the City Council on what party will be ti
responsible for the operation and maintenance of the
lift station.
7 . Execution of a Recordable Agreement which permits storm
water run-off from the racetrack site to flow south,
across the plat , into the drainage outlet .
8. All buildings shall be constructed at two feet above
the flood level .
9 . Execution of a Developer ' s Agreement for the construction
of the required improvements :
a. Tram/Pedestrian Walkways - construction of a walk-
way on eac of w is connects the lot with adjacent d�
lots and or Canterbury Downs . V_
b. Water System and Electric to be installed in accordance
wit t e requirements o the SPUC Utilities Manager.
C. Sanitary Sewer and Storm Water System - to be in-
stalled in accordance wit t e Design Criteria and
Standard Specifications of the City of Shakopee.
d. Outlots - no building permits shall be issued for
Outlots A, B and C until they are replatted.
e. Assessments - the developer shall agree to the City
Engineer s method of apportioning the installments
remaining unpaid against the plat and that the developer
waives his right to appealing the apportionment.
f. Park Dedication - in lieu of land, cash payment to
e pai at time of building permit issuance .
10. Should the lift station remain private, execution of a
recordable agreement, binding to each lot, that states
that the owners are responsible for operation and mainten-
ance of the lift station.
11. The City Engineer must receive and approve final plans and
specifications for all public facilities including, but
not limited to, roads , sanitary sewer system, storm sewer
and grading.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk be
and the same are hereby authorized and directed to execute said
approved Plat and Developer' s Agreement.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee , Minnesota , held this day of
1985 .
Mayor of t e ity of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City C er
Approved as to form this day
of --- -�.
City Attorney
MEMO TO: Shakopee Planning Commission
FROM: Judi Simac, City Planner
DATE: October 31, 1985
APPLICANT: Scottland, Inc.
LOCATION: E 1/2 of NE 1/4 of Section 8 lying N. of centerline
of CR 16 ( approx. 65 acres )
ZONING: B-1 Highway Business , I-2 Heavy Industrial, I-1 Light
Industrial
LAND USE: Proposed hotel and other commercial uses
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 12 . 04 , Section 12 . 05
FINDINGS REQUIRED: Section 12 . 01, Subd. 4
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting preliminary and final
plat approval of Canterbury Business Park Addition,
a plat which consists of two blocks and three outlots.
SURROUNDING LAND USES: North - Canterbury Downs
East - CSAH 83
South - CSAH 16 Light Industrial Uses
West - Vacant Light Industrial
PUBLIC UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water available
CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The proposed plat consists of two blocks, each with two
lots, and three outlots (which will be developed in the
future following replatting) .
2 . Access to the subdivision will be from CR 83 . Twelfth
Avenue will be constructed as a 44 foot road, whereas City
design criteria requires 36 feet. A 1000 foot temporary
cul-de-sac will be constructed to serve the four lots.
In response to staff concern regarding the proposed location
of Twelfth Avenue and it' s intersection with CR 83 , the
developer is preparing a traffic study which will be available
at the public hearing.
Twelfth Avenue will be 390 feet north of the proposed northerly
by-pass on-ramp right of way line, which exceeds the MnDOT
requirement of 300 feet. Application for a County Road
access permit has been made. The County Engineer recommends
approval of the plat with the following comments: 1) drainage
work within the highway right of way will require an approved
utility permit, 2) additional information as to traffic
generators on the site may provide justification for auxillary
lanes, 3 ) preferred access would be across from existing
12th Avenue, however this entrance is private (Racetrack .
entrance) .
3 . Outlot B is shown as a future r-o-w to serve the Outlots
and provide access to CSAH 16 . It is shown .at 40 foot
width and should be at least 60 feet, however a requirement
of plat approval will be the replatting of Outlots A, B,
and C.
4 . Twenty foot drainage and utility easements are shown for
the four lots. Easements should be dedicated on the Outlots
also.
5 . It is not recommended that sidewalks be ccnstructed along
Twelfth Avenue , however staff feels a pedestrian walkway
system should be designed to provide access among the lots
which will be commercially developed, (hotels, residence
inn, restaurants, etc. ) and to provide safe pedestrian
access to Canterbury Downs . It is recommended that the
developer ' s agreement provide for the construction of the
pedestrian walkways as each lot develops.
6 . The sanitary sewer plan proposes the construction of a
lift station and forcemain which will pump to the existing
sewer located in CR 83 at the K-Mart distribution center.
The developer has indicated that the liftstation is the
best option for now, with possibly a future connection
with the jackson interceptor.
In regard to the operation and maintenance of the lift
station, three options exist:
1. Entire sanitary system becomes public.
2. Owners maintain lift station (private)
3 . Owners maintain lift station and when the entire plat
is fully developed, it is turned over to the City.
The decision on the lift station will be made by City Council.
The developer maintains that there is adequate sewer allocation
for the development. The Council will be discussing the
sanitary sewer allocation policy at their November 6th
meeting.
7. Storm water will drain to the southern edge of the plat
and be carried in a ditch to an outlet which will be constructed
on the east side of CR 83 . The Consulting Engineer has
approved the drainage plan and calculations. The plat should
provide a drainage agreement to permit flow form the Racetrack
to travel south to the ditch and outlet.
The flood level for major storm is at 749 feet. The flood
level should not be confused with flood plain. Buildings
are required to be constructed at two feet above flood
level.
8. The SPUC has not yet submitted review comments. An 18
inch watermain exists to serve the property.
9. The proposed lots meet the minimum requirements for area,
dimensions, etc.
-2-
10 . The plat contains an area of the 169 by-pass r-o-w in the
southeast corner. This area has not been dedicated on
the plat. Staff has requested a legal opinion as to whether
the City can require dedication of highway r-o-w, which
is located on an official map, through the platting process ,
without payment of compensation.
11. The proposed name of the plat is Canterbury Business Park
1st Addition. To avoid confusion, the plat should be renamed
to Canterbury Park 2nd Addition.
12 . It is not recommended that any land be dedicated for public
use.
13 . The Finance Dept. indicates a special assessment balance
of $1, 679 .
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends preliminary plat approval subject to the
following conditions:
1. Name of the plat be changed to Canterbury Park 2nd Addn.
2. Title Opinion by the City Attorney.
3 . Submittal of a traffic study which indicates that the Twelfth
Avenue intersection with CR 83 is acceptable.
4 . Approved highway entrance and utility construction permits
to be issued by the County Engineer.
5. Dedication of twenty foot drainage and utility easements
around the perimeter of the outlots.
6. Determination by the City Council on what party will be
responsible for the operation and maintenance of the lift
station.
7. Determination by the City Council on a Sanitary Sewer allocation
policy.
8 . Execution of a Recordable . Agreement which permits storm
water run-off from the racetrack site to flow south, across
the plat, into the drainage outlet.
9 . All buildings shall be constructed at two feet above the
flood level.
10. Determination by the City Attorney as to whether by-pass
r-o-w should be dedicated in the plat.
-3-
11. Execution of a Developer ' s Agreement fcr the construction
of the required improvements :
a) Pedestrian Walkways - ^cnstrtUcticn of a walkway on
each lot which connects the lct with adjacent lots
and or Canterbury Downs .
b) Water System and electric to be installed in accordance
with the requirements of the SPUC Utilities Manager.
c) Sanitary Sewer and Storm Water System_ to be installed
in accordance with the Design Criteria and Standard
Specifications of the City of Shakopee.
d) outlots - no building permits shall be issued for
outlots A, B and C until they are replatted.
e) Assessments - the developer shall agree to the City
Engineer ' s method of apportioning the installments
remaining unpaid against the .plat and that the developer
waives his right to appealing the apportionment.
f) Park Dedication in lieu of land, a cash payment to
be paid at time of building permit issuance.
12 . Should the lift station remain private, execution of a
recordable agreement, binding to each lot, that states
that the owners are responsible for operation and maintenance
of the lift station.
13 . The City Engineer must receive and approve final plans
and specifications for all public facilities including,
but not limited to, roads , sanitary sewer system, storm
sewer and grading.
Action Recruested:
Motion to recommend preliminary approval to the City Council,
subject to conditions.
tw
-4-
ISM ✓E N V H OO TIESY INC.
a
TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE CONSULTANTS L C-
7901 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE,SUITE 119/EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344/(612)944-7590
November 7, 1985 85-34-62
REFER TO FILE:
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Tim Keane, Scottland, Inc.
FROM: James A. Benshoofc)Ag
RE: Access for Canterbury Business Park
As requested by Bill Engelhardt, we have reviewed the basic
access needs for the Canterbury Business Park. As we under-
stand; the Canterbury Business Park is planned to be a
multi-use office, hotel , and commercial development, which
would occur on about 65 acres of property located immediate-
ly south of Canterbury Downs and west of County Road 83 .
The particular question that we have addressed is : Should
access for the Canterbury Business Park be provided via a
new, direct access point on County Road 83 or should access
be provided via the existing access point serving Canterbury
Downs ( intersection of County Road 83 and 12th Avenue) ?
Given the types of proposed land uses and the significant
scale of development, it is highly important that the
access/egress needs of the development be effectively
accommodated. Objectives that should be accomplished
relating to the access solution include:
Provide an access solution that is effectively ident-
ified with the development to minimize the potential
for confusion among motorists traveling to and from the
site.
Provide adequate capacity and safety for ingress and
egress movements.
Minimize potential conflicts between development traf-
fic and other traffic on County Road 83 and on 12th
Avenue.
Effectively relate the traffic needs of the proposed
development with those of Canterbury Downs.
Tim Keane -2- November 7, 1965
In comaleting this review, we have related the access needs
for the Canterbury Business Park to actual traffic condi-
tions experienced at the Canterbury Downs access point loco-
ed at County Road 63 and 12th Avenue. Specifically, I ob-
served Canterbury Downs traffic exiting at this location
during the period immediately after the last racing event on
October 15 , 1985 . At that time, the Canterbury Downs road-
way functioned in a one-way outbound manner and was serving
a high volume of exiting traffic. No traffic was allowed to
use this roadway to enter the Canterbury Downs site at that
time.
Another related experience that we have had pertains to
traffic studies that we have performed for the Met Center in
the City of Bloomington. We serve as on-going traffic en-
gineering consultants for the Northstar Financial Corpora-
tion, which owns the North Stars Hockey Club and leases the
Met Center, and have performed several traffic studies for
that site during the last three years . Two points we have
learned from this experience , which pertain to the Canter-
bury Downs and Business Park situation, are that : 1 ) the
traffic needs for major special events are quite different
from those of other land uses and 2) the traffic needs for
both special events and other nearby land uses need to be
carefully considered to provide reasonable access and egress
solutions for all involved land uses.
Considering the types and intensity of development in the
Canterbury Business Park and considering our, related ex-
periences with Canterbury Downs and Met Cent;er traffic, we
have concluded that the Canterbury Business Park should have
a separate means of access via County Road 83 . In our judg-
ment this access solution is necessary In order to provide
reasonable access for the proposed development and to min-
imize conflicts with Canterbury Downs traffic.
The alternative concept of serving the Canterbury Business
Park via the existing Canterbury Downs driveway would in-
volve several significant difficulties , including:
Conversion of the eastern portion of the driveway into
a public street and then realigning it into the Canter-
bury Business Park site. The Canterbury Downs driveway
then would come to a T intersection with this new, re-
aligned roadway. The end result would be reduced con-
venience and increased delay for Canterbury Downs
customers .
Substantially increased conflicts between Canterbury
Downs and Canterbury Business Park users. During the
periods before and after Canterbury Downs ' events ,
access and egress for the Canterbury Business Park
would be more difficult.
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Eaglewood Bond Issue - Resolution No. 2472
DATE: November 13, 1955
Introduction and Background
Attached are recommendations from Springsted Inc. for the issuance of bonds
for the Eaglewood street reconstruction. It is planned that Dave MacGillivray
from Springsted will be present to review any concerns that Council may have
on the issue. Resolution No. 2472 has been prepared by bond counsel and provides
for the issuance and sale of the bonds.
Action Requested
Move to accept the recommendations of Springsted Inc. and offer Resolution
No. 2472 for adoption.
16
Extract of Minutes of Meeting
of the City Council of the City
of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular or
special meeting of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Scott County, Minnesota, was held at the Shakopee City Hall
on November 19 , 1985, commencing at 7 : 30 o' clock P.M. , C.T.
The following Councilmembers were present :
and the following were absent :
The following resolution. was presented by Councilmember
who moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2472
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE
AND SALE OF $255 , 000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1986A
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota as follows:
1. It is hereby determined:
(a) That the following assessable public improve-
ment projects ( the "Improvements" ) have been
duly ordered by the City, and have been con-
structed by the City or will be constructed
under contracts which the City has or will let
therefor , all pursuant to and in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 :
Project Designation & Description Costs
Eaglewood Street Reconstruction Project Budget
Total Construction Costs $242 , 299
Plus: Allowance for Discount Bidding 3 , 060
Plus : Capitalized Interest 10 , 111
Total Project Costs $255 , 470
Less : Reinvestment Earnings ( 470 )
TOTAL BOND ISSUE $255, 000
(b) That it is necessary and expedient to the
sound financial management of: the affairs of
the City that the City issue its bonds pursu-
ant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and
475, to provide financing for the Improve-
ments.
2 . The City shall therefore issue and sell its
$255 , 000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds , Series 1986A
( the "Bonds" ) , to provide financing of the Improvements , and
$3, 060 of such amount shall represent additional bonds
issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes , Section 475 . 56 , as
additional interest required to market the Bonds at this
time. The Bonds shall be issued and sold in accordance with
the following Official Terms of Offering :
3 . The City Clerk is authorized and directed to adver-
tise the Bonds for sale in accordance with the foregoing
Official Terms of Offering and to cause the abbreviated
notice of sale attached hereto as Exhibit "A" to be pub
lished in the manner required by law. The City Council
shall meet on Tuesday, December 17 , 1985 , at 7 : 00 o ' clock
p.m. , C.T. , for the purpose of considering sealed bids on
the Bonds and taking any other appropriate action.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by Councilmember and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof :
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and
adopted.
EXHIBIT A
NOTICE OF BOND SALE
$255, 000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds
Series 1986A
City of Shakopee
Scott County, Minnesota
These Bonds will be offered on Tuesday, December 17 ,
1985 . Sealed bids will be accepted by the City ' s Finance
Director or his designee until 2 : 00 o ' clock p.m. , C.T. , on
said date at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 800
Osborn Building, St. Paul , Minnesota 55102 , when they will
be opened. The City Council will meet in the Shakopee City
Hall at 7 : 00 P.M. , C.T. , on the same day to consider the
bids for award of sale. Dated January 1 , 1986 , the Bonds
will bear interest payable semi-annually on each February 1
and August 1, commencing August 1, 1986 , and will mature on
February 1 in the years and amounts as follows :
$ 20 , 000 1988
$ 25,000 1989-1991
$ 30,000 1992-1994
$ 35,000 1995-1996
Bonds maturing after February 1 , 1993 , will be subject to
prior redemption in whole or in part on said date and on any
interest payment date thereafter at par plus accrued inter-
est to date of redemption. No rate of interest nor the net
effective rate of the entire issue may exceed the maximum
rate permitted by law on the date of sale. Minimum price,
$251 , 940 . An approving legal opinion will be furnished by
O'Connor and Hannan, of Minneapolis , Minnesota. The purpose
of the Bonds is to finance various assessable public
improvements in the City.
Bidders should be aware that the Official Terms of
Offering to be published in the Official Statement for the
Offering may contain additional bidding terms and informa-
tion relative to the Issue. In the event of a variance
between statements in this Notice of Bond Sale and said
Official Terms of Offering, the provision: of the latter
shall be those to be complied with.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Judith Cox
City Clerk
Dated: September 19 , 1985
Further information may be obtained from the Issuer ' s Finan-
cial Advisor , SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED, 800 Osborn Building,
St . Paul, Minnesota 55102 , 612/222-4241 .
D �
RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
$255,000
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1986A
STUDY NO. 3023
7 November 1985
SPRINGSTED Incorporated
SPRINGSTED 0L--
INCORPORATED
PUBLIC FINANCE
ADVISORS
7 November 1985
Mayor Eldon Reinke
Members, City Council
Mr. John Anderson, Administrator
Mr. Greg Voxland, Finance Director
City Hall
129 East I st Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
RE: Recommendations on the Issuance of $255,000 General Obligation
Improvement Bonds, Series 1986A
We respectfully submit our recommendations for the issuance of these bonds.
The City staff has advised us of the intent to now proceed with the definitive
financing of the Eaglewood Street Reconstruction Pro'ect, No. 85-2. The total
cost of this project is estimated by City staff to be 257,000. The amount of
the bond issue was established as shown below:
Eaglewood Street Reconstruction Project Budget
Total Construction Costs $242,299
Plus: Allowance for Discount Bidding 3,060
Plus: Capitalized Interest 10, 1 1 1
Total Project Costs $255,470
Less: Reinvestment Earnings (470)
Net Bond Issue $255,000
The issue includes an allowance for discount bidding in the amount of $3,060, or
$12 per $1,000 of bonds issued. The allowance for discount bidding is a means
of providing the underwriter with all or a part of his working capital and/or
profit for purchasing the issue, and thereby allows the underwriter to bid
coupon rates at or close to the reoffering scale. This allowance has been a
worthwhile marketing tool in the past for the City, and we recommend its
continued use in this issue. If the underwriter chooses to bid up to the
maximum amount of the discount, the City will receive not less than $251,940
in net bond proceeds.
The City has elected to certify special assessments upon benefited properties in
the amount of $51,459, or only 20% of the total project cost. This level of
special assessment is the minimum amount allowable by Minnesota Statutes
without the City being required to conduct a referendum authorizing the
issuance of the bonds. These special assessments were adopted by the City
800 Osborn Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 (612) 222-4241
250 North Sunnyslope Road, Brookfield, Wisconsin 53005 (414) 782-8222
Recommendations - City of Shakopee, Minnesota
7 November 1985
Page 2
Council in October, 1985 for payment over a ten-year period at a rate of 9.75%.
Exhibit I is a projection of the annual income from these special assessments.
This projection assumes the City does not receive prepayments of assessments
nor experience delinquencies in collection.
We have prepared Schedule A as the recommended structure for the issue. This
schedule is developed in consideration of the expected assessment income and
the resulting requirement of the City to levy general property taxes for the
balance of the yearly debt repayment which was unassessed. Columns I through
5 provide an estimate of the annual debt service of the issue. Column 6
reflects the statutory 5% overlevy requirement, which protects both the City
and the bondholder in the event revenues are not collected as anticipated.
Column 7 lists the projected special assessment income from Exhibit I plus
interest capitalized in the issue. Column 8 indicates the annual deficit
resulting from subtracting the assessment income in column 7 from the 105%
levy requirement. The anticipated annual property tax levies are indicated in
column 10. This issue is designed so as to allow the City to levy taxes in a
fairly constant amount over the term of the bonds. The total of all such levies
is estimated to be $308,983.
The first interest payment will be due August I, 1986. This payment will be
made in part from the first receipt of special assessment income and in part
from capitalized interest. The second interest payment will be due February I,
1987 and will be paid from income of the some two sources. The inclusion of
capitalized interest in the issue is required for these two payments because of
the absence of a tax levy in 1985 to augment assessment income. By October
10, 1986 the City will be required to levy a general property tax in an estimated
amount of $31,687, which when combined with anticipated special assessment
collections will be sufficient to meet debt service payments due August I, 1987
and February I, 1988. All subsequent debt service payments will be paid from
this combination of special assessment income and general property tax
revenues.
We recommend bonds maturing on or after February I, 1994 be subject to a
provision for prepayment in advance of their stated maturity at a price of par
and accrued interest. The City may exercise this call option beginning with the
payment due February I, 1993 and on any interest payment date thereafter.
This prepayment provision applies to $100,000 or 39% of the bonds. With the
allowance for discount bidding this call option should not adversely affect the
marketability of this issue.
In the formulation of this issue we have used an estimated interest rate of 7.6%
which approximates market conditions as they now exist. The bond market has
been volatile over the last several weeks with higher volatility expected before
the end of the year. Much of this market disruption is caused by the expected
large volume of bonds being offered for sale between now and year-end as
issuers rush to sell bonds, such as industrial revenue bonds, which may be
modified or precluded under proposals now being discussed in the federal tax
code. We therefore caution that the actual rate received on this issue may
differ from this estimate depending on the developing situation at the federal
level.
Recommendations - City of Shakopee, Minnesota
7 November 1985
Page 3
We recommend the City authorize SPRINGSTED Incorporated to make an
application on your behalf for a rating of this issue by Moody's Investors
Service, Inc., of New York. The City's present rating is "A" and we anticipate
this rating will be reaffirmed. Moody's will charge a fee of approximately
$2,000, which will be billed directly to the City and payable from the proceeds
of the issue.
We recommend the issue be offered for sale on a competitive, negotiated bid
basis with bids received at the offices of SPRINGSTED Incorporated no later
than 2:00 P.M., Tuesday, December 17, 1985. We will prepare a summary of bid
proposals received and transmit the information to Mr. Voxland who will
present the proposals to the City Council at its regular meeting at 7:00 P.M.,
that some evening. The City Council will be asked to consider a resolution
awarding the sale of the issue to the successful bidder.
Respectfully submitted,
SPRINGSTED Incorporated
7 November 1985
David N. MacGillivray
Senior Financial Analyst
/dlr
EXHIBIT I
� 6 (31'
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA Prepared November 4 , 1985
$255,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION By Springsted Incorporated
IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1986A
PROJECTED ASSESSMENT INCOME
EAGLEWOOD STREET
FILING DATE : 10/ 1/1985
FILING COLLECT INTEREST
YEAR YEAR PRINCIPAL @ 9. 75% TOTAL
----- ------- --------- -------- -----
1985 1986 5, 146 6 , 282a 11 , 428
1986 1987 5 , 146 4 , 516 9 , 662
1987 1988 5, 146 4 , 014 9, 160
1988 1989 5, 146 3 , 512 8 , 658
1989 1990 5, 146 3 , 010 8 , 156
1990 1991 5 , 146 2 , 509 7 , 655
1991 1992 5 , 146 2, 007 7 , 153
1992 1993 5 , 146 1 , 505 6 , 651
1993 1994 5, 146 1, 003 6 , 149
1994 1995 5 , 145 502 5, 647
TOTALS 51 ,459 28 , 860 80 , 319
a) Includes interest from filing
date to 12/31/1986 .
W
M � o00000000o SCHEDULE
Fa �
� am
oc
� raa
a ,w
_ < o >
I I I I I I I I 1 I F O
\F orMorMri Q1 rLD M �
a t!1 mcLnLn --INNmrn m a £
DU -- L0mMm -10rmr-+ m m < [� O
co UOcz
Z a Cidr4 Ln 11;rN110 -TN -10m c (ra
MMMMMMMMM O M F
DD M WME+
cn I v} owa
LnQ
aww
mw UFx
0%, z z W
x F
O Z Ol N O m Lc Ln M 1-4 01 r O
Ln a w W M LD Ln to Ln Ln Ln -�T cr M
Ln l0 r--I I'D r-+ lD -- 110 r--i 1.0 v
a0 M0r-
wU MU -- + o) rnmmrr -,D �.cui o
cc w N
W M Ln O Ln
> W r 1.0 M
O W m o m
z F
M Ln M m
u N V}N
0 Z r-1 1.4
W + D1 m M m M m IT O lD M M V} V)-
>4 O\o
}>roW MvOOr-1l0 rm Mqzr r
RC a > Ln LnMOOONcovMLn C
a cn W O LD
w a '--1 1--1 ra Ln M -- v ri m N m m
M >4 — NC rll' vv V M V' M Q`
a
yr to •• E•
o -,M
U £ O
c U
E-
M
M E F
w w M
Lnccocccoco Ln a czw
a mco %DlOLcIDm0N \D r ww as
< a� Mm01Or-1mLomlo m F --W
F Ln z E-
0 —
0 — CMN00) N0) r, 0r o F Z
F N M V' C M -�r M M v M m z
M a o
moa
o U �
z M F
Z H O
O F
F Ln000ooccc0 Ln
oV a M m m l0 LO LD LD m O N I'D r
O W .-. mmco0) 0r-Im (11(1111D m
1,0 Z W -- o 0) r- Ln V N m r Ln N Ln
• Z F
r � z -i
m lD O oho
01 Ln Ln Ln
/•C Zr1 I'D CO
F O ."o r-
0
O " -4
M F W a r
W 4 H Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
z u x a o c o c 0 0 0 0 0 0
ZP-+ W 00000o00o 0
� acn UM
£ � Z -- OLnLnLn000ln1n Ln
O m i--i N N N N M fn M M M Ln
wU1 C1 a N
ao r4 a yr >4w
W z \ F F
as a0 r4 -1 oct
0W co ax
b4 \\ o
SwF rIN W •• F
S V' Z a' rwm01--1NMV' Lnlo W 44
M W ON w £ 0
W O W r>r r-I r-I r-1 r-1 r-1 1-1 -- r-I r-I ri W W Z
00 > W £ v; > U
0 ox a <
',N Ln IZ W O >4 ,-. Ln LD r m m 0 r-I N M -W Q IZ
FLna F F > .-+ mmmmmmo mmm F Z w u
r N £ 4 a W 0 0 >>
U V}H 0 £ a ri -4 r-1 r-I -4 r4 r-1 -� r-I '-d F Lm 4 <
- I
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director
RE: Summary on Shakopee Brochure
DATE: November 15 , 1985
Introduction•
Last spring the City Council approved an expenditure of
up to $13 , 000 for the development of a new brochure in coordination
with the Shakopee League of Women Voters. Staff worked with
the League over the summer and a new publication was produced
in time (almost) for the Industrial Commercial Day. The Council
received copies of the brochure in September. This memo is
to summarize the status of the brochure in terms of costs and
administration, so Council can evaluate the effectiveness of
this activity.
Background•
What is called the "brochure" is actually a folder with
five separate brochures, each highlighting a different segment
of information, including: 1) Local Government, 2 ) The Community,
3 ) Downtown Revitalization, 4 ) Commerce and Industry, and 5 )
Planning and Zoning. The first two books are to replace an
earlier brochure produced by the League as a community and voter
education project. In the past the League book was done with
League volunteer time, and contributions from the City and civic
organizations . The last three brochures are to replace and
expand upon information previously printed in brochures (Shakopee
Today) produced by the ICC for the Industry and Commerce Day
and general promotion of the City. The last ICC brochure was
a joint effort of the City and the Chamber of Commerce.
It happened that all copies of the previous League brochure
were distributed at about the same time the ICC was looking
to produce a new brochure - so the idea of a combined approach
was approved. A different number of the various brochure components
were printed in an effort to look at the potential distribution
of each.
One new element to the brochure recommended by City Council
was the request for financial support from local businesses.
A letter was sent to approximately 460 local businesses offering
to list their name on the brochure for a $25 fee. In the end
62 firms participated - more had indicated interest, but not
all paid. This effort therefore produced additional revenue
to support the project in the amount of $1550, with staff and
overhead costs to carry out this effort in the range of $200-300.
A copy of the brochure has also been provided free of charge
to participating businesses.
Local realtors have also been offered the chance to purchase
multiple copies of the brochure at cost, to distribute to their
clients. A letter recently went out to solicit orders from
the realtors .
The brochure was delivered to the city on the ICC day.
Due to this technical difficulty there may not have been as
many brochures distributed at this event as planned, but it
is estimated that approximately 250 were given out. In the
past the ICC budget included printing of brochures to be distributed
at the event and additional copies handed out in the next year
or two. This year it is proposed that the ICC be charged only
for the 250 brochures distributed, which at a cost of $3 . 45
each, provides a total cost of $862. 50.
Cost Summary
The total cost of the project, exclusive of the League
of Women Voter ' s volunteer efforts and staff time was $9550.
This cost is reduced in the following ways:
Total Cost $9550. 00
Jaycee Contribution 200 . 00
Business Contributions 1550 . 00
Realtor ' s Purchase
( 1 year estimate) 825 . 00
ICC Day Charge 862 . 50
Net to City for general distribution 56112 . 50
The remainder of the brochures will be distributed by staff
to developers interested in Shakopee and by the League of Women
Voters to new residents through the Welcome Wagon. The City
also offered to provide the League 80 copies to be given to
the Shakopee Public Schools to use in the government classes ,
and 40 copies to their members and other agencies such as the
Shakopee library. The copies provided to the Welcome Wagon
and League are in consideration of the League ' s contribution
of time and energy to the project, which they have done to promote
government education.
One last factor to consider is whether the Chamber of Commerce
should be provided with copies of the brochure to distribute.
In the past the Chamber has helped with the cost: of production
and has been a main distribution point. This year the Chamber
was financially over — extended due to its efforts in promoting
the tourism brochure, so it was unable to contribute financially
to this project. However it would still be useful. to distribute
brochures through the Chamber if the City Council feels this
is appropriate.
Reauested Action:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 2469 , A Resolution of Appreciation
to the Shakopee League of Women Voters.
2 . Adopt Resolution No. 2470 , A Resolution cf Appreciation
to the Shakopee Jaycees.
3 . Direct staff to provide brochures to the Chamber of Commerce
for distribution.
tw
CITY OF SHAKOPEE j p
RESOLUTION NO. 2470 1
A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO THE SHAKOPEE JAYCEES
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee has recently published a
brochure to inform the public about Shakopee , particularly the
community, local government, downtown revitalization, industry
and commerce and planning and zoning; and
WHEREAS, the Shakopee Jaycees did contribute $200 towards
the cost of publication; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota that a resolution of appreciation
to the Shakopee Jaycees is hereby adopted and extended to them
for their support.
Adopted in session of the City Council
of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of
1985.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1985.
City Attorney
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
R7S07UTION NO. 2469
A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO THE SHAKOPEE LEAGUE
OF WOMEN VOTERS
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee has recently published a
brochure to inform the public about Shakopee, particularly the
community, local government, downtown revitalization, industry
and commerce and planning and zoning; and
WHEREAS, the League of Women Voters did write and coordinate
those sections of the brochure focusing on local government
and the community; and
WHEREAS , Paulette Rislund and Kathy Busch did represent
the League of Women Voters in a most professional and cooperative
manner in all matters related to the publication of the brochure;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Shakopee, Minnesota hereby expresses its appreciation
to the Shakopee League of Women Voters . and especially to Paulette
Rislund and Kathy Busch for their consciousness, professionalism
and efforts relating to the publication of the Shakopee brochure.
Adopted in session of the City Council
of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of
1985 .
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1985 .
City Attorney
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Joseph P . Ries , Fire Chief
RE: Capital Equipment - Rescue Truck Bids
DATE: November 15 , 1985
Introduction and Background:
Bids were opened on Thursday, November 14th at 1 :00 p.m. for
one fire-rescue apparatus . The specifications call for a cab
forward chassis with the motor between the driver and officer
seat to allow for a large enclosed crew area right behind the cab
to allow safe transportation of presonnel to and from emergency
calls . This crew area will allow eight firefighters to dress
and don air packs enroute to fire calls .
The rescue body was designed with large compartments on the
outside, which allows ease in geeting equipment out and for
storage of said equipment. One side of the rescue body com-
partment will carry firefighting equipment and the other side
rescue equipment . There is a door in the back of the rescue
body which leads to smaller compartments where medical equip-
ment, special suits and smaller items are stored. There also
is a storage area for hazardous chemical textbooks and references
as well as area maps . Next to them is a small command center
with tactical sheets for larger incidents . The aisle also
leads to the crew area.
The rescue truck is equipped with a generator for electrical
power for emergency power equipment, and also to power the
quartz light on the rescue truck for area lighting. The truck
committee has apent many hours on the specifications to
arrange this apparatus to fit our needs now and years to come .
The chassis cab is to be made out of aluminum for weight and
corrosion resistant . The rescue body main components and area
subject to rust is made of #304 stainless steel , this should
allow this unit to last well over 35 years .
Bids received were as follows :
Custom Fire Apparatus , Inc.
$156 ,279 .00 for complete unit .
Add $3 ,800.00 if chassis is not paid upon delivery
of chassis to custom fire
Saulsbury Fire Equipment
$201 ,892 .00 for complete unit
Add $6 ,000 .00 if chassis is not paid upon delivery of
chassis to Saulsbury Fire
This rescue truck is over our capital equipment budget of
$125 ,000. 00. The rescue truck was in the capital equipment
5 year plan at $145 ,000 .00 , but was cut for 1985 capital
equipment budget to $125 ,000 . 00 , which makes the difference
much greater. There is no extra equipment or fills on this
unit .
Recommendation and Action Requested:
The truck committee reviewed the bid specifications and found
everything in order and recommends that the bid be awarded to
Custom Fire Apparatus , Inc . in the total amount of $156 , 279.00 ,
with chassis amount of $76 ,284.00 to be paid upon delivery of
chassis to Custom Fire, Inc. and the balance upon delivery of
completed rescue unit to Shakopee, MN. Delivery of completed
unit is 150 to 180 working days .
Radio was bid separate by Motorola, Inc . in the amount of
$3 , 700. 00 for one eight frequency mobile radio and accessories ,
which has to be added on total of apparatus .
JPR: cah
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator jo A
FROM: Judi Simac , City Planner
RE: Racetrack District Land Use Study
DATE: November 15 , 1985
Introduction:
At the October 29 , 1985 meeting, the City Council adopted
several motions which launched a Racetrack District Land Use
Study. The purpose of this memo is to provide an update on the
progress of the study.
Request for Proposal from Planning Consultants :
The RFP has been prepared and sent to thirteen consultant
firms . The submittal deadline is November 27 , 1985 . To
date , four firms have indicated to staff that they intend
to submit a proposal .
Selection Committee:
The Racetrack District Land Use Consultant Selection Committee
shall consist of:
Gloria Vierling - City Council Member
Jerry Wampach - City Council Member
Dave Czaja - Planning Commission Chairman
Dave Pomerenke - Planning Commission Member
Al Furrie - I.C. C. Vice-Chairman
Judi Simac - City Planner
Based upon Council direction, staff perceives the duties of the
selection committee to include :
1. Screen proposals and interview three firms for con-
sideration.
2. Provide recommendation to the City Council on selection
of consultant .
3. Work with the consultant during preparation of the
study through discussion sessions with the consultant .
Estimated Time Frame:
November 27th - Proposals due
1st week of December - Staff screening of proposals
2nd week of December - Committee interviews & recommendation
December 17th - Council authorizes hiring of consultant
December 20th - February 1st - study period
February 11th - Joint meeting of Council , Planning
Commission and ICC for presentation
on draft report
February 25th - City Council adoption of study
March 1st - April 15th - Public hearing and implementation
period
Action Requested:
Motion to accept staff interpretation of Council motions to
proceed with Racetrack District Land Use Study, and submitted
progress report .
JS : cah
A` ✓ \
V
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judi Simac , City Planner
RE: Sanitary Sewer Allocation Policy
DATE: November 15 , 1985
Introduction:
At the November 6 , 1985 meeting, the City Council approved
a motion to direct staff to prepare a Resolution establishing
a sanitary sewer allocation policy and bring it back to the
City Council for consideration.
Background:
Following the discussion of several possible components of a
Sanitary Sewer Allocation Policy, the City Council approved
a motion to inform developers , at the time of platting, of
the recommended gallons per day sewer allocation and if there
is a possibility of exceeding that limit , the developer should
talk further with the Planner and possibly the City Council .
Attached is the proposed Resolution.
Action Requested:
Offer Resolution No. 2476 , A Resolution Establishing a
Sanitary Sewer Allocation Policy, and move for its adoption.
JS : cah
Attachment
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
RESOLUTION NO. 2476
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A SANITARY SEWER
ALLOCATION POLICY
WHEREAS , the existing Comprehensive Plan for Sanitary Sewer
Service 1980-1990 established an average sewer flow of 1, 000
gallons per acre per day for commercial and industrial zoned land;
and,
WHEREAS , in accordance with that plan the City staff has been
monitoring sewer flows of developments through the building permit
process ; and,
WHEREAS , the City Council additionally desires to monitor
anticipated sewer flows at the time of preliminary plat approval ;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Shakopee , MN that a Sanitary Sewer Allocation Policy is hereby
established which shall require City staff to inform developers ,
at the time of platting, of the recommended gallons per day sewer
allocation and if there is a possibility of exceding that limit,
the developer shall further discuss the issue with the City Planner,
and possibly the City Council.
Adopted in session
of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this
day of 1985 .
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1985 .
City Attorney
CITY OF" Still_ 0
ifs41 29 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota
10
MEMO
TO:
John Anderson & City Council
FROM: Jim Karkanen - Public Works
SUBJECT: Equi pment yard screeni ng
Sept . 25 , 1985
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
The Shakopee Planning Commission has requested that the Public
Works Department provide more screening around their equipment yard to
present a more aesthetic st orage area to the surrounding neighborhood .
BACKGROUND:
In late 1976, the Public Works department crew planted Zabel
honeysuckle inside of the fence area of the equipment and storage area ,
primarily on the west perimeter , north side and the eastern fence line .
Russian Olive trees were planted across the southern borders of the yard
to screen the yard from any proposed development to the south . This
area is now the East vi ew Addt . Because of t he ground f i 1 1 at t he
southern edge of our yard , some of the planted trees did not survive ,
and the honey suckle on the east fence line have recently died back in
the last several years . The honeysuckle planted on the western fence
1 i ne i s st i 11 heal t by and wi 11 not have t o be repl aced at t he moment .
There . are parking areas on the east and north sides of our building
which have Russian Olive and Mountain Ash planted on them, which are
very healthy at the moment , but if a 4 foot hedge is required ( as per
Ord . #158) , t hen vari gat ed dogwood soul d be pl ant ed out si de of t he
tree line . However , this wi 1 1 present a visibility problem for squad
cars exi t i ng f rom t he Pol i ce St at i on ont o Gorman St . i n emergency
conditions . The hedge line can' t be inside of the tree' 1 i ne because it
i s used f or snow st orage i n t he wi nt er .
The Shakopee Pubbi c Ut i 1 i t y Commi ssi on al so has a pol a and hydrant
storage area at the west side of our Municipal Services Building in the
- strip of land between our west dri vew&y , and the fence line separating
our property from the Clifton Townhouse property . In our opinion , the
poles which are stacked at \t he fence line next to the f i nce line , has
creat ed a ppent i al hazard t o t he chi 1 dren who are somet i me seen pl ayi ng
hese neighbors .
.
in and around these poles , ..and they create an eyesore to t
If Council wants us to provide more screening to the neighborhood , then
i t woul d be our suggest i on t hat t hey al so request t he Ut i 1 i t y Commi ssi on.
to move t hese pol es t o snot her 1 ocat i on . After the poles and of d
hydrants are removed , we can t hen 1 andscape t hi s st ri p of land and
add t rees , pl ant ed veget at i on t o creat e a screen bet ween t he two propert l E
If i t ' s the Council ' s desire to add more vegetation , we would
suggest pl anti ng more Russi an Ol i ve t rees across the south , southeast and
sout hwest area t o f urt her screen t he yard t o t he sout h . The existing
honeysuckle on the west side has survived , and doesn' t need any
repl acement at t hi s t i me . The fence 1 i ne at the east and nort heast
area could have plastic slats inserted into it which would provide an
_
opaque screen f rom t he Gorman St reet f ront age road and t he property
di rect 1 y to the east . The parking lot east of our building has Russian
Olive and Mountain Ash trees planted , and we have lost only one tree
at these sites .
In order to comply with the 60% requirement of 4 foot vegetation
as required by Ord . #158, we should plant about_1-50-- Teet of-:- dogwood-
. --
at the si t eea.st__of _,our bui 1 di ng, about 50 feet of dogwood north of the
building , and the _west side of our.- building is about 375 feet. _whi,-ch
woul d requi re about 95 dogwood pl ant s , and approx . 13 t rees of vari ous
vari et i es . The varieties suggest ed_e-woul-d-..be_ Russ-i an—OLi-ve-.,_.._Mount_ai n
Ash , and American L_i_nden_y„.(-ba-sswood .)
Attached is a chart showing estimated quantities needed , and
costs , and a location chart .
ALTERNATIVES:
1 '. Screen all areas indicated i n memo.
2 . Screen only storage/equipment area .
3 . Acknowledge the "grandfather” exception to Ord . #158 for the yard ,
and do nothing.
4. Replace only the areas which have lost their vegetation from di eback .
5 . Enclose entire fence/yard area with plastic slats for an opaque
view to the neighborhood would be approx . 1440' @ 3 . 40 -- $4900.
EST. UNI T QTY.
SPECI ES
SIZE SPACING LIFE PRICE NEEDED
-------------------------------------------------------------
Vari gated Dogwood 3' 4' 15 yrs . 5 . 00 181
( bare root )
;ussi an Olive 5' 25' 12-15 yea 8 . 50 23
( bare root )
n:. Linden( basswood) 1 2-"di a . 30' 20 yrs . 23 , 95
( bare root )
;t Ash 1 z" 30' 25 yrs , 16. 00 5
( bare root )
11 a st i c fence 6' cont . 10-15 yrs . 3. 40/1 .f -
i nsert s
REQUIREMENTS
APPROX. F-T6E- plants trees COST
AREA -----
--------- -------------- 4 6 0, 18 $ 155
South & SE/SW port ion f ence $1175
West fence ( slat s option only) 345' $ 460
Nort h f ence ( East side, - slat s3-7 135' $ 170
North fence ( West side - shrubs) 135' 35
$1240
East fence to NE gate ( slats only) 365' 15 $ 605
West side of building 375' 95 $ 19Q
East side- of building 150' 38 $ 65
Nort•h._si de of building
50' 13
-- _--__--- —__---- r 14 4 0' --__-_-------- .$ 5000
Total fence enclosed w/slats __-,-s
. i ----
Part i al sl at s 500' @ 3.40
181 $ 905
33 S .,435
$ 3040
/ o
10
/ sNRvbs
� ,000A 14
Lr-pl.4cff
wIst,e09
Ts} Ex�srny
gc-pu
� 1
cl
/00 1 oo"—
q,
tie
i4A
IlkfOF
i
x E7 IMMU
moo
PHOTOGRAPH OF I
S. P. U. C. POLES ,
J'
ON WEST SIDE OF
BUILDING
t
100
MEMO TO: Mayor, Councilmembers
FROM: Tom Brownell , Chief of Police
RE: Fourth Avenue East Traffic Control
DATE: November 12 , 1985
Introduction:
With the opening of Canterbury Downs it was soon apparent that
the intersection of East Fourth Avenue and Shenandoah Drive
was a hazardous intersection prone to vehicular accidents .
Background:
The City and consulting engineer recommended to Council the
reduction of the speed limit on East Fourth Avenue from
50 mph to 40 mph which on July 2 , 1985, Council approved.
On September 12 , 1985 , the State of Minnesota advised the
City Administrator , authorization to establish speed limits
requires approval by the Commissioner of Transportation.
Council by Resolution 2447 requested the required State study.
On October 25 , 1985 , the State notified the City of the results
which establishes the following speed limits :
1 . 30 mph from CSAH 17 to 850 feet east of CSAH 17 .
2 . 50 mph from 850 feet east of CSAH 17 to CR 83 .
Between July 26 , 1985 , and October 10 , 1985, there have been
three personnel injury and two property damage accidents
injuring five persons . These accidents are of a type suscep-
tible to correction by a multiway stop installation.
The State field study documents speeds from 35 mph to 70 mph,
100 feet west of Shenandoah Drive. During a two hour period
49 vehicles were traveling 50 mph to 70 mph. During the
racing season 3 ,153 vehicles are north and south bound on
Shenandoah during a seven hour period of time. The State
speed survey was conducted on 10-16-85 , 8 : 05 to 11 : 15 a.m. ;
10-17-85 , 5 : 50 to 7 : 55 a.m. & 10-17-85 , 8 : 00 to 11 : 10 a.m. .
Canterbury Downs closed on 10-15-85 .
Recommendation:
The City Engineer and myself recommend establishing the speed
limits on East Fourth Avenue as directed by the Commissioner
of Transportation. We also recommend installing stop signs
at the intersection of East Fourth Avenue and Shenandoah
Drive for east and west bound traffic creating a four way stop
at this intersection.
Council Action Requested:
Direct staff to install speed limit signs as authorized
by the Commissioner of Transportation on East: Fourth Avenue
in the following locations , 30 mph from CSAH 17 to 850 feet
east of CSAH 17 and 50 mph from 850 feet east of CSAH 17 to
Co . Rd. 83 . Install stop signs on East Fourth Avenue at
Shenandoah Drive .
TB : cah
��NHEs°r4
bo �o Minnesota f6
Department of TranslDortation
District 5
2055 No. Lilac of Tvk GO den Drive
Valley, Minnesota 55422
(G12)x3tfcxNxk
593-8544
October 25, 1985
Tom Brownell, Police Chief.
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re: Speed Zoning - 4th Avenue
City of Shakopee
Dear Mr. Brownell:
The speed zoning study requested by the Shakopee City Council for 4th
Avenue between CSAR 17 and C.R. 83 (Resolution 2447) has been completed.
As discussed with you previously, the study results support the following
speed limits for 4th Avenue:
30 mph - from CSAH 17 to 850 ft. east of CSAR 17
50 mph - from 850 ft. east of CSAH 17 to C.R. 83
The above speed limits have been recommended to the state traffic engi-
neer who will. issue a formal speed limit authorization to Shakopee.
The problem being experienced at Shenandoah Drive is a "spot" problem
best solved by measures other than speed limits. Your suggestion to
change the "stop" signs from Shenandoah to 4th Avenue is an example of
a possible solution. (Four-way stop signs should be used only if war-
rants are met.) If the stop signs are not changed, intersection warning
signs for 4th Avenue would also be a possible improvement.
We have enclosed radar speed samples from the study for your information.
If there are questions concerning either the data or our recommendations,
please contact Ed Brown at 593-8549.
Sincerely,
J. S. Katz, P.E.
District Traffic Engineer
Attachment:
,i cc: John K. Anderson - City Administrator
JSK:pn:EB
An Equal Opportunity Employer
MEMO TO: Mayor, Councilmembers
FROM: Tom Brownell , Chief of Police
RE: Remodeling Police Clerical Area
DATE: November 12 , 1985
Introduction:
The Police Department has been allocated 1985 Capital
Improvement funding for remodeling the clerical area to
provide security for documents as required by the State
of Minnesota.
Background:
The required quotations have been received for general
construction.
1 . Fagen-Edman, Inc . $7 ,409
2 . Goodwin Builders , Inc. $9 ,960
Recommendation:
Accept quotation of Fagen-Edman, Inc. for general construc-
tion work for $7 ,409 .
Council Action Requested:
Approve quotation of Fagen-Edman, Inc. for general construc-
tion work for $7 ,409 .
TB: cah
1
C I -F LSF SHr"iKOPEE"
INCORPORATED 1870
* ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
129 E. 1st Avenue - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650
MEMO TO: Jahn K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Fulton Schleisman, Engineering Inspector
SUBJECT: Fifth Avenue Sanitary Sewer Reconstruction
DATE: November 12, 1985
INTRODUCTION :
Partial Estimate Voucher No. 5, the Serni-Final Estimate for
this project requires Council approval.
BACKGROUND:
The Contractor has reviewed the attached semi-final estimate
and agrees that the totals represent the final contract amounts.
The final total contract amount is $141, 376. 51. Of this amount,
$43, 029. 81 was paid by others:
1. The State (Women' s Correctional Facility) , paid
$22, 347. 67 for the extension of the sanitary sewer system
to their new facility. The amount stated in the Agreement
with the City was $17, 415. 00.
Shakopee public Utilities paid $20, 682. 14 for watermain
improvements on the project. The original contract amount
was $113, 304. 06.
The amount retained, $100. 00, wi1l be paid on the final payment
estimate voucher.
ACTION REQUESTED :
A motion to authorise payment of Semi-Final Estimate No. 5
to S. M. Hentges & Sons in the amount of $796. 28 for 5th Avenue
Sanitary Sewer, Project Na. 1984-6.
�0�lje_
proved fSubmittal
Ken Ashfel , City Engineer
FSlpmp
MEMN05
SEMI-FINAL,
c'AP-r1P GSTI+rlgrc ��r�l_�=1-1597
Contract No. 1984-6 Partial Estimate Voucher No
Period Ending: Octr.ber 31, 1925
TO: Contractor S. M. Hentoes 8 S,--m
Address 1503 West 3rd Avenue Shakopee MN 55379
Project Description 5th Averiue Sanitary Sewer Reconstruction
1. Original Contract Amount $ 137,460. 51
C. Change Order No. 1 Thru No. 4 a 2, 020.66
Total Funds Encumbered $ 139. 481. 17
4. Value of Work Completed $_141, 376.51 Value of Work
Remaining
5. L. S. Percent Retainage $ 100.00
-0-
6. Previous Payments $ 140, 480.83
Percent Complete
7. Deductions or Charges $ -0-
100%
8. Total $ 140. 580.23
Payment Due (Line 4 - 8) $ 796, 28
CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT
(I, We) hereby agree that the quantity and value of work shown herein is a fair
estimate of the work completed to date.
CONTRACT /� y�errfgPs- REVIEWED BY SHAKOPEE PUBLIC
n UTILITIES COMMISSION
BY
1 v
TITLE
Manager
APPROVED - CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Date
City Engineer Date
City Administrator Date
r +T r-
"�iJ�., �:` A�2".:�- Ji+,•..-H-. J2kC. 91�N1--I'R� t� I�-1T. �.... �
}:-RIOD EN"INS: C,1! 7 R�70:. _. SE_
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(UYtT'a^; eii. L' r:t Grlre I u.an`itl' Hr_rU"t l'Ud'r.l'..V r H61 0 r: I I�uBr,':L'd I iargl!)r`,
------ ------------------------------ ------ ---------- ---------- --------------- ---------- --------------- ---------- ---------------
IP:�^-,-
1 14" Evia Heavy Cast
r 20 » «i C r' i �.1 1
I L••or, SV3 Pip? l L.F. 1 $19.34 ! i_k:.•.kr4 ! .,,8c,,.0�: I 0:Dir I f l..br ! 24.01 i $464.16 i
I I I l I I ! 1 I !
2 16" Extra Heavy Cast I !
(Iron SVS Pipe IL.F. 1 $15.20 I 10."..00 1 $1,520.00 1 0.00 1 50.00 1 0.00
3 14" Wye IEa. 1 x55.00 1 50.00 1 Q,750.00 1 0.00 1 $0.00 1 44.00 1 $2,420.00 I
1 1 1 1 1 1 I i I 1
4 16" Wye l Ea. 1 $70.00 1 5.00 1 3356.00 1 0.00 l $0.00 1 9.00 1 $91320,00 !
I I I l I I f I I i
5 !Connection to Exist. Svs. lEa. I 365,00 1 55.00 1 $3,575.00 1 0.00 1 $0.00 1 54.010 1 $3,510.00 !
I I I I I I 1 I I
6 18" PVC Sewer 0-8 IL.F. l $15.16 1 1550.00 1 523,493.00 1 0.00 1 $0.00 ! 870.010 1 $131.310.48 !
I I I ( I I I 1 I I
7 18" PVC Sewer 6-10 IL.F. 1 $17.16 1 780.00 1 $13,384.80 ( 0.00 1 $0.00 1 1465.00 1 625,139.40 1
I I 1 I I ( 1 I I
8 18" PVC Sewer 10-12 IL.F. I $19.66 1 760.00 1 $14,941.60 1 0.00 I $0.03 1 754.00 1 $14,823.64 1
I I I I I I i i I
9 18" PVC Sewer 12-14 IL.F. I 525.00 1 10.00 1 $250.00 1 0.00 1 $0.00 1 0.00 1 $0.00 1
I I I I ! I ! I I 1
10 18° DIP Sewer IL.F. 1 $322.84 1 20.00 1 $656.80 1 0.00 ! $0.00 1 19.03 1 $623.96 1
11 IStd. 4' Manhole IEa. 1$1,250.00 1 9.00 1 $11,250.00 1 0.00 1 $0.00 1 9.00 1 $11,250.0:! I
I I I I I ( ! 1 1
12 (Additional Manhole Depth IL.F. 1 $76.50 1 8.00 1 1612.00 1 0.00 1 $0.00 1 7.90 1 $604.35 !
I I I I I I I I 1 I
13 (Lower Watermain IL.S. 1 $600.00 1 1.00 ! $600.00 1 0.03 1 $0.0? 1 1.00 1 $600.00 1
14 lBiturzinous Pavement Removal IS.Y. 1 $1.50 1 6000.00 1 $91000.00 ( 0.00 1 $0.00 1 6162.00 1 $9,243.00 1
I I I I I I I I I I
15 IMnDOT 2341 Bit. Patching Iron 1 $25.63 1 675.00 1 $17,300.25 1 6.00 1 $153.78 1 844.03 1 $21,631.722 1
I I I I 1 I I I I l
16 IC1-5 Base Material ITon 1 $6.00 1 2100.00 1 $122,600.00 1 0.00 1 $0.00 1 2083.00 1 $12,498.00 1
I I I I I I I I 1 1
17 I Sod ISA Y. 1 $2.50 1 $800.00 ( $2,000.00 1 177.00 1 $442.50 1 770.00 1 $1,92-j.00 1
------I-----------------------I-----I---------I--------I -��----I--------1---------------I--------I---------I
I I I I Total 1 $118,156.45 1 Total 1 r $596.28 1 Total 1 $118,673.71 1
Chanoe Order No. 1 L.S. $315.66
Chanoe Order No. 2 L.S. $879.00
Change Order No. 3 Extended Completion Date
Chanoe Order No. 4 $826.00
Limerock 413 Tons @ 422.00/ton
TOTAL $120,694.37
T:CT.: JT' AiJ_1L_ SA.'-i Hn _Lh'_H: _
F_ � - _STI?A?:. ?,,,. . : --_
=F:IO EKDIti5' Oc:c'oer ;' 192: C� _c^^TO,. �t =t• SONS S"
iter I----------------------------------1�Iv-*--------`^.,t.E�, -------- ----r,� er. Pei, -------------T_------r--_------
i\U• ! :Or a�- Ise,' J ra: Pr l' ar.. A'.L� nt ! t. :.. `.c: vv >✓a:_
Ce i uU 1tv 1 N Dua"� .V I Ari ourj- ! R'an,t 1 v t k_nt
------'-----------------------------'------ ----------!----------I i
II--------------- ---------- ---------------'----------'---------------
iPnnT
i ! !
1 1Retiove & Salvage I ! ! I 1 !
V CIP '_.r" I $3.50 1 365.02 I $1.'277.52 1 Mt, 1 fC.00 I 255.00 I Ii.;42.50
!
2 (Remove t Salvage Hydrant Ica. I .500.@C I Me. I $1,001' @0 i C.00 I 50.00 I 3,0E I $1,5E'0.00 1
I ! I I I 1 I I 1 I
3 162 DIP IL.r 1 $22.00 I 20.00 1 $440.00 1 C.el." I $2.00 I 42.7E I $1,071.40 1
I I I I I ! I I I !
4 112" DIP IL.F. I $20.70 I 345.00 1 $7,141.50 1 C.Co I $0.00 I 346.00 I $7,16 .20 !
I I I I I I I I I I
5 1Cut in 6" GV w/sleeve [Ea. 1 $600.00 1 1.00 I, $602.00 I C.U. 1 $2.00 I 1.00 1 $60C.0C i
I I I I ! 1 ! I 1 I
6 (Hydrant IEa, 1$11300.00 1 33.00 1 $3,900.@0 I 6.00 I $0.00 I 4.00 I $5,200.00 I
I I I I I I I 1 1 !
7 16" GV IEa. 1 $375.0; 1 3.00 1 $1,125.00 I C.00 1 $2.@0 1 4.00 1 $1,500.00 1
1 I I I I I ! ! I !
8 I)ituminous Pavement Removal IS.Y. 1 $2.00 1 100.00 1 $2013.00 1 01.00 1 $0.00 1 64.60 ! $129.20 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1
9 IDIP Fittings ILbs. 1 $1.25 1 1250.02 1 $1,562. 1 0,22 1 $0.00 1 678.00 1 $847.50 1
I I I I I I I I I I
10 1MnD0T 2341 bit. Patching ITon 1 $25.63 1 12.00 1 $307.56 1 2.00 1 $0.00 1 8.00 1
I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 !
11 IC1-5 Base Material 1Ton 1 $6.00 1 250.00 1 $1,500.00 1 0.00 1 $0.00 1 171.55 I
I I I I I I I I I
12 ISod IS.Y. 1 $2.50 1 100.00 1 :250.00 I C.20 1 $0.00 1 72.00 1 $155.00 1
1 I I I I I I I 1 !
I I I I I I I I I !
I 1 1 1 I I I { ! I
1 I 1 I I I I ! 1 I
I ! 1 I I I I I I I
1 1 I I ! ! ! ! l 1
I I I I 1 ! I I I 1
1 I i 1 I I I I I I
1 ! I ! I I ! I I 1
I I I I I I I
1 I I I ! I I I G I
I 1
I I I -
I---TotaI---
Total 1-- - $0.00 1- Total 1 $20,662.14 1
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER $120,694.37
TOTAL WATERMAIN $20,68^c.14
GRAND TOTAL $141,3376.51
` U U U
w a
Q 0
0. W
E
M
c1�
1
M O
ti
D_ MM fA m ^f
.1 = fT T S
0
N SL O o M m O
N N c0 .ti m
• r+r+ O N
z O 1..1.1 N N N N N N *!N N N N SCD.-1N N M .-1 N
by •'- MS It d S O' b'M SS0ID C' r •rM •1 .1 .4M S
I i t 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l t l i 1 1 1
.1.+.r�D.-1 .� r S .� S 1.4 .-/.-1 r
O co r• -4 N N N NNN�•NNM M fp co e+ co N
z r M S SIV-W7 dSSID S rriMrl •-1 rM S
1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1
H O NN O M N oO NNN NN O 000N 0 - -4 In
z h MM M r1 e'1 fMMM MM MMMto M NN
M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M N
O a .pS J +t C' SSS0d'SS
U 1 I I
a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0
z F'
o rn
H
CL m
1-f1-1- H F- H !+ F-ti�- F- � •'
m zz Q Z zzzzz
U 0 1-1 1-f x - w•.H 1ti 1ti Z z Z rr w w x
0 w Qa y Q N(oa Qa QQ N "" - -C (d ZZ
W 1-4 fx W W S W WSSxxS W 4aax 00 W
O H H U
as J a a JJaa.aaa J a w as a
x J .+.. a U_ ., a d 1-1--1-1- a O O 0 u-1 > W W w
w .r 00 a fY O aa07»O a 000 Q JJ a'
»00000 D JJJ O K WW
r♦ O W W N (o W NNW wW Ww N O9Ow
K
W
M
(o
1-1
W H J J J J J J J O • • • • u
� J aaa aaaa N t�uc� c� u
u Q s a a a a a a a z z z z z
U ►yM Q. W V7(oN NNNN oa \\\\ cm O
w H N F- N 4- F- H K
a z JJJ JJJJ z z z z z W a
U O N N f-f Q a a Q a 4 a Q 0 0 0 0 O
ryr r'1 K N K K K K N iA (J C f 1 f.1 7 V
v
o w z z z z z z z w x xx x a
2 ? R Q d [] w w.W w W w w U U U U • K
L1 W - D O b+ W UUU UU UU 2 W W W W Y P.-
�
Q O J 0000000 \\\ \ z o d M a
O W W - 3 (o N - N 1-F- f•-ti r. 1.. W
O Sx a 0 N O » >7OO
ry a a a a
t # # # # #
a a 00 o DID+ NN 0 .•r SNNNO 00 NNO1Mf.- MM 000
h f� O O o .•r 0 o O O f-a M S N h ✓1 .J a 1 t!: N O rb I!') e-1 ^I � M '.b t1
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
hn SAO o NN T C` 0o dOMMN'�MN '^ ^+ MN U'1 DN oto MNCO T
N 1.- CO r 0 1n u1 a, T .-1 .-1 ON N 1n N h r D+ M .-,co M 0 0 M M M
Z N
D
O
x
a
y Ch 4^ 7J
Lo
O
Y
U X M • „1.,+, a O y S .L.p �C ,D .� ..^.
L) y .N r: •J
C� S f` f�h i !� R N t` rr f+ �•.N
N to om cn in cn :n <n cn
U V U U U U U U C,)
W 1 1 I I 1 I I I
0 • +
i i r i +
W Q t + # + + + +
+ +
U IA # # # i t + + + +
Q /n
a w
s
Ln a
m
1
M o
I a M r x
r+ 11 a M
*' ul In
M o r
• M O r
7
z N N .-t .i M .- N N N N N 10
►� 'D o M M4* IV M
1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1
O N o a M a .r M r N N N N N .0
z 'D o in d%C d
I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I
V- In D, 01 O O O O O N N N o
.4 - ti 10 co r ►i .q M M M N
N P to M M M to M M N N N N N N M
O a a
U 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1
u - M
< o .r N O o o N o r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
z
O
ti
f-
CL > > >
a < X a a z z z
u 2: a a > > > a W >
N S x X cr X S' U 0 N N Q a a o:
W W - W W W z W W W= f f W
O U N In 0 < IH H M In
< X X rr Y N JJ.Jd a a
2: � W w a U- LL. W Z) �- aaat, a
w x x = o 0 0 = <n z a a a > > > o
F- :3 I- F- 1' C H z W O O O O O O X
.. V O O a a s o r z N N N W W w a
0!
W
N
N
M
C7 IA N W
W F f- Y X U
K U u U O 2
» > O K
Y OO K Y U IrSKIr in \ W
U 0 0 H S S Z U Q Q Q Q F- J
W K 5 U U < z d 3 3 3 3 O ? J
x a s N K » E W N D O 0 cm - rr O
u O w W W T. co ?_ re rY K K m O U
r Y v nc v 'mm ri < < coca < -i
O UU 5 4 N O' SSSS I
O O O ;D • • < N H 7 73 <
2 of K O Uf N I 7 2222 n \
W Z O O M cq
2 2 .+ z W W o N 2 V)in V1 N : n u �
QQ N zz F- W JJJJ M:
K W- 7 o - - < < 4 0 0 0 2 J O
m m 0] O O m U U U U U U U U 7
t • • • r • •
tM.q to to CD 0+(3% OO OO CDM cc W) %D co co MM MM
r10 cc NN NNin z10 OO OO OMmul NN ON 0s r �
O t O 10�D .r•* �N O O 11;EC O o NO T 3) O o
co'0 0% a%m N N CO ID 10 r .O I0 O o
O O .f It
Z • • • ► �� V o
7 M 9 T N N
O
1010
F
4
w
.J L7 N :n ,' ,n -
a 07 c0
J \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \
XLd
a ..r .-• -y .-�H .-+ .r .r.y..y .-r .� .r
Q .-r .r ti .r .y-• ti .- .r.- .-+ ..+ ..+ .r .-
lL 0
O
r. O
N _
H
U Y N NLi 0 13 Im 12 10
0 0 O O # O O r cr_ • '�. • i
an ti ti r-
71 V .-r ...r + .y .-1 i .y..t i .r a • .y►. ..r .y • i .-r r i
.+ M M M i !^1 + M ^.1 i M�'�• M M i M i M i M t
1
M V) ("I 0
NC - Y Y Y Y Y Y
u U U U U U U
Li
0
W Q + + • i i • i
C7 N + i i i + • +
Q N
a w
s
;n sx
x
1
M O
r
� u Ln
u-. o
Z N N N CpNNN .(-1N NNo N N H•+ .1 N N -14N
rr SID 1.1 Ir a0 T 1.0 10 Ino M MMMd In MMM MSD
1 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I l l i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
• .O r•f N H
1-1C4
N 1"1 f•N O ri O 1-1 N N 0+I'llJ � N 14 14 4•"/
O N NN co NNN 1" 4
N N•-1•+ M •^ r+ r-NN .-I f7
z J y"D (n '0 V] IOM O M MMM Lo M M MM M M 0
1 1 1I l l i i l l l l t I I t l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
r N o 0 O O O O O O O O N 01 N 0 0 0 0 O O O O N N N
•d•-,
H M M " M 1-1 N .4 Ln LM M 0, r+ M M N Ih
C N NN NNNNNNNN NLn N NM1+1N MM NNN NN
It o- o- o- o-a o- a o- o- ea o-o-
u 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
U .-� .� .d 14 14.- 1-1..�1.7 1.1 .-�-4 .4�0 -4
Q C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0-1 o O O O N O o 0 0 0 O O
i
z F'
O 0
H 0 J
CL m O
r+ F- 1.-o D o r r
m z - F-1-M-z w J fn 2 r z J Z
v r, Z z Z 1-4 a w a s u z - w 1-1
N 4 (n fn NNN fn 0 N DQ
W x W W W W WW WaICE--Zm LL wed caw w4E LL
-
a JJ JJJJJ 0_K t Jr - J w J n. wa
x .• as as 0.a0.0001-•w o azza > w a0 '-1 0"
w D as aaa o. a000m r a .... a az dam
r 0 70 >7>> > J -j-i cI- O p cr : O OJ O 00
1-1 W Wfn fnNNNNO'] 3.I L7]W O X: 0 as 0 u 037 w w
w
M ,
0
H
U
W Y Y Y
xtr Z2z
w _w aaa
Yrn =__
U 0 • • • • • • • • • ! Z
w LY O O W W w w W W W W W W W
= O J J 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 0 (D(D 0(7 W W W
UH T.0 T = T T S K n rn rn f f(1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ca 0 rn 0 0 '7 O 3 S 3 .0 0
,Y .T T TT �•I N R^of ]Y Y -
o n as O e000 L)U zxx ►+1-+
p p rr � N(n fn fn 1nN000N O W W
a 4 4 0000000000 2� Z12 JJ NfAO Nfn
W U U 7 z z z z z z z z z tL 4 4 4 a w U. z 2 z z z
? . -----1- --rr- > xsx 000 ww
r • • zzzzzzzzzz J F/- F-F- JJ xxf z
xT zzzzzzzzzz 0000 gxm wwir 'zz
O • • - 0 0 0 0 0 0>m 0 0 Q ¢a a a Q Q a a a W W
U V U 'O O O g 0 0 0 0 O O W w w w w w w 2 x 2 x x
41 41 41 41
fT fT ONN - 1 N•- •1•h Mtn Mf- NN - 0to p- co N co to - o .-1 10 14 N 00 0
;n to In NO a ds ONr\0r• 0a, a IA Ln 10MCMx too- ClmF- 00 0
I.n to 11Ln TSD ON o-11 1; 1; 1� 14 t, c0 o N N
p'O' N N Q N N Ln -1 M.+ 14 00 N N N 1-1 Ln CO 11 M 1-I N N
N N M M
z
O
a
w
_ al
i om mwmmm. mmco m cc ma x x 0 xx m cox
'L 'n MM MM7 `r'fM MrnMM Mr^ M MMM'^ In
2.r v+1r.r 1.• .-+ .-� .-�.-1 r N r H.-1 .y .r.-1
0 H � ._. '.L N.r..• .r.y .-t...1.y..� .1 ..+..A.--1.-. .�.-1 -y r/.r
U_ 0
O
y 7
L-
M
U Y a
al in . aooar!Do r a r hhr-n i M"^ + .ro- a i ,-..+ i i
u ...1 .+ .r r `7 M M f^ r'! M ,n M M + O
LnL.J --.-1 1-1 - - .-1.-1.r N i - H i .-1.ti .-•r t rM 1- t N N N i N N t
'= A A A i A A A A A h A h h h
fT` U
.- M MM + MMMMMMMMMM a M r MM MM
T rJ) <n N v) w 11 v, 0 �
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
U U U U U U U U U
W 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1
C7
W Q # # i # # + a • #
LD N
Q W
CL w
N :m
co
1
M O
.4 • h
1 a o
.-� St N d
d 1'+
• In N
z rl N O .-1H .p O ti N O v'IN dd +T N M N
M d d O M d ." O d �0 O .- "M .d.1 M d
i 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
• .i O N ••r •- 0'I N 0 .r.-1 N M ..4 N .-1'0
O d M O H.-1 •O O S N O In N d 0' a, N M N
Z In d O M d .` O to �D O -1 M ,.�.•1..1
1 I I 1 1 11 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I
F- 0� O m N N 0 0 0 O d O O m C% o o N N
Z .• H M M .-. N N In .+ �-f to P• M M
U1 N Ln N N M M M M rM W) M M N N
d d d d d d d
U I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
U .-I H M .-0 H .�M h H .ti" d d tf7 N .-� e-V
Q 10 0 r o 0 0 N N o co 0 0 .-1 .i H O o 0
z 0
O W
v D
0- ❑
a > >
H 0
K K w zz O 70 to N O ZZ
U a. a. HH > ? � H CL a. zza. V1 HH
N M: y s a s w m z (n z o o W a s
W H W H .E x W W W W D oa od H H od H S S
K J z a.a. J O O i•- H a.a.
S w a. W H H IL tL LL- a. H z Z S S z J H H
w x a. = o M o 0 o a. X: H H o o H H >>
a a: xm o w ms cexce r- C3 C3
H o cn o W W a. 4 a. N w a.a_ a. M a. o W w
K
w
ti
H
O z z z J
W N O O W W W
K Z U U OM F`- M- 1- J U U
U H Z 7-
0 KK Vf fn fn Z O LL HH
Y (n In K 4 4 J J J H N O
U W W D O Q Q Q M
W eJ J J Z Z 3 m 3 2
H SL1-
2 z
U N N IJ •- F- re K re H S S
N I1 [n N ISI!.I I.1 Q n
a. H Z z z z z J z z
O H U 1 N N W W W 7 H H H H H J O O
7 z 1.. Z ZZSF_ m a. KK (Y KK •.• (n v1
W W 4 O W W \ \\ o ca a. a_ aa > - re
S 2 Vf Z Z Vf N N K J N W W
Z S S 2 4 Y Y Y Y Y H Y Y
f S S W W <C 4 G F- U Z z z Z z J J
H O
cc K K K ♦t O H H H H H O 4 4
t t _ t i.
MM MM L, LM t00 OD OtoO {n MM OO In to 000en OO ON
N O N O N I!) N N C 0 lG N I0 %D .l.a 611 to in 5
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
r N In .`I M d � �-- o r� I M J S 0 O 4 4' P 1!� 1: -.0 d�
I+ti Occ vd 0 0 .Dvd d NN 00 ADT NND+n1
'D N N v1 In .r er 1..N In
z s
S
4
1
co 10 x
10
v-D
N
I" Z
U S + .1 k ^, .[l ♦ \•V f` • i O'-' 7 0 0 k C H .-y
(� eti ; ♦ ♦ Y .r ♦
.y v. r Y .n.r .� • k • '�r-.
1
j
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y -
U U U U U U U
w 1 1 I 1 r 1 1
Li Q i • i i i + i
a w
a w
In a
CC)
1
� o ,
I a
Z N If1N cDOHNN .iN N •i•- ^iN MM N .
NMv-4— a0
-r
. ¢ o r •..�H n .4 -
I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 i t 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1
• .� .'r r H N .'1 N H.�N .-r�0 .d�D T co n H.-1 H r N
O N IAN CO co
4NN r•N N.!.- .9NMM N o r- NM Ln p.. CO
Z .-i M a .+.� M M a%0 a a M M a a ..I+-+
I 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1
0000000 ONNNN 00 HH+-+T H
M r•r• rnr- I.nrP .4MIII MM Ln V) .-1 N NNNNN N
M M M M M M M M M M N N N N N M M N T M M M M M M
C) a .aa aaraaaa aa.r as as a a saaasa
u 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I
U 1-I •--H .i H.i.d.-+ .-1+-1 H H T ri H .r TI +4 T "
Q O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O m 0 0 0 0 0 0
O N Z
_ H
r N
CL m a
H D m co r w
K N zzzz » a u
J 00 0000 to 00 HHRH as Z W W W W W W
W W W W W W W W W to Q Q a Q Q z z z z z z
Li H H H H H H H H H W X X F g o y'a w U 000000
o J rr- rrr�-rrF. H u xxxsss
HH HHHHHHH Jaa. (LM rr a f- aaa n.aa
7 J J J J J J J J J - 0- H H R H z z W H W W W W W W
w q H H H H H H M H M a H H C E J J J J J J
D O 4 0 a K K. w W W W W W W
N W W W W as 0-
a:C • • Z
U u on m O
Y w w H H N
u J J
w ww rr
x
U N rn N N of
O JJ u u u u u u Q cc QK CC J -
p J J En N ON Vf fn Q-cc QQ Q d C J
? a C Q a.x Q a Q Q a s n. a s ,-+ M Id J J J J J J
W ?7 00 U' 000 to -
W W W W W W W K C K C C S w W W J W w
G Z Z Z Z z Z z z z 00000 to N _ m m m m m
:E ZZ zzzzzzz -j -j • Q
Q .-i H H H H H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 o- m 5 3 3 3 3 3
S Z z Z z z z
i i t i i t i t
In o o TM N 0 T i-MN If, SDN T co CD OOO mm mm .-1N co a coN
a0 a TT O �D OT O CO OT
.-+ r+ 'OOti SOTNaas Nrn.4TCD '+N ID \D ID Ina �D
.p ao O MOf- a .-+m 4.(P 1A.- NN I.U)N %0 kD 'J a MMM OMN
N N I• - N a N M N N
O
F
Q
w L1 !n r uJ U,? ul N I(? �� �� ,� n n Ln :n ul
n m cacx � w co
a co mm 00 cc onanw � xcccccoIn coq \\\ \\\
o \ \\ \\\ \\\\ \\ In \\ \ \
Y M hM M MM MM M .n M "] M �; ..,.M M M MM ✓� "�,n'+!
lt. O
O
Z
n. r r`tir i r..titil� r-r_
J X T + r i ?; M. i O
U + + .n M M -n M M M i S C S�T S lf7 i .n + 71 T. 7" T. Cd C[)
w .� • .�M i M M M ^'�'� M M t M M M M M + M M t M } M + M M M
,,,y 2 \ i r•n i f` P-h N r` r• n i ti f`r• f• M f\ A i f` t !` i 1.!• N !.\
T U .� i n N.r H r N.i i .A H N.+ eti i n .+ i ,-/ • + .-0++ r•.�H T
T
M • r M k M N7 M M M M M i M M h
.0 !n c7 N
Y Y Y Y Y X Y Y X
U U U V U U u U U
W I 1 1 1 I I I I I
W Q i # i i t t 4 # t
4 #
Q fn
IL W
m
In u
o
1
M o
1 d o
•y f N
1-4 * I
N 07
2 N M 0 .1 N IT M r4 .-+ M o Cj N a .-1 to ..4
M MI tM to M ¢ q. 11 N d
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1
O H N M to .4 M M -+ M o N N s ;n 1+1 0
2
PI) PI) d0'•ti N0 a .+ o s a r .� .-i Tlo to
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I i t l
•4.-1 .• O O (T O o O o o •y T T
Z N N N N N N N N N .-1 t c .-+ - — - M y 11
O MM MM M1 to MMM M M ^J N N M M c\Lr) En
O •?C 47 d 4.0 lw t eh
C.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1
Q 0 0 0 0 0 0.N•ti N O p U 0 0 O O O N I0
2 H F
O N N
M H H
CL N N
a > ca m > >
1-4 O D >r O O
U W W W W W W W W W > 2 N N Z y CL
(n ZZZZZ2ZZZ C S cn NN oa od W Zr
W 000000000 W .r WW W 0 - o-J
O =T TT =T=XX N .+ �-r J J G
CL n. mm0_ m0_mm y C J JJ W W F+ C C
W W W W W W W W W U- F- W Cl (L a > > F-l J W
W JJJJJJJJJ O 2 = C CL CL Q a z = =
W W W W W W W W W x W L-- O D C
M FF1- F�F.NNF1- d C O N N y F� F U OO
K
W
F
N
H
C)
W
cc N
x , z z
U ea (7 M•..1 F H H
W O0 0 C N cn N
T C
N < J J W W Z Z Z
t.) W 41 61Y E 0 0 0
N d Z IJ �! Z 7' 1.1 L)[1 IJ
0 T O Y ly C
J J J
2 JJJJ...IJJJJ m J N 00 5 Z W W W
W J J J J J J J J J U Y O J J In a 0
> W W W W W W W W LJ 07 W
d^ 00 z J 227
mmm(37m(nmmm I 2 O O Z7 0 2TT
5 F ►'. U Y >r O C
Li Li tj
mmmmmmmmm C M tY Q W W J d •r"-4
mZZ2ZZ22Z o CL 0_ K w W E tn(1)W
# • 11 # # t # i i
M N c0 0 a0 M 00 1 0 �4 IT to In to co c7 0 o to o tIn o 0 0 o O s O d'
Mol0.- .rM00 poN IAF- NN X010 ar r - U-1 = o ti.y Oti cc Lr
N W a v T r A D o .
.D. C O• D a -•
,4 n M rM.y t
F M NN 7d NN tQ as .ti.i nN00
Z NN OO .rN
_O
N
I a
a
i
n n :� r nl^.
a rocOmccmcmm m cc c - C,cn x oo ,o
0 1111 \\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ 1111 11 \ 1111 \
Y M M M M M M M M M M M M M r M
o `
U Yu co r !�ti rcr,r n\ t` 4 N 4 r t O t L N N k
'7 IJ M M M M M M M'�1 M 4 .f t r k r t 4 ,•. � k # r 4 P• T C t
00 m A^ F- ^ti fl-
u
•J .�r' .d..1 f� .r 4 i •r i 4 Y ..+ .r 4 4 N i ...1..� 4
H MM M M MM M
C.1 M M
I
Y Y Y Y
U U U U
W I 1 I 1
LD
W Q
U rn # # # #
4 0
6. W
f
In R
co
I
M O n
H
1 CL m
-1 N
.y SS O
H
• N
5
HHN �0 Ln n!oMM W W.- NNN w.- N IA NN ..•NNN 000 14
H M M InM4' 10 .-1HH.- HHMMd 0 H.♦MMM4'J %0i00`O000 M
II
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
• 0� N �"+N�D .� .-� W.'1 N�O H 4'.- .'•.'1 H H N.- H.�.'4 h H N�0 W 0 0 O M
a In nM IMM W coNNN c0 W•- N In NN HNNN 000 -4
Z M M MM4' 4' H.+•"�.� H .4M Al. 0 .-1.4MMM 4'J0 0�o ,o OOO M
1 1 1 1 1 f l i l ll 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t l l l l l l l l l l l l I
H In N NN N In 0 CIN CD OO o 00 000 0000000 0000 04 to In O
Z cli
U'1 M MMM
M M Hlo In W11 nh p-p- n nnnnrnn nrnn HMM .H
M N NNN M M
PI)MMM7 MMMMM M MMM M7 M In Nn Mo pipe Ill go co M
O0' 4' 4.4. 4 71 4.4. 4•J 4• JJ 4. 4' 4' S'7'J 4.4. 4•J 4•d 4'J 4•MM 4'
U 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II
1 1 I I I I I I I I t t I l I I t
LJ -•I .� H.i .'+ .r .-+ .-1.i H.- H .'1•- .4 H .-1 .i.4�- .i 1 .'1♦- .'t.-1 .y.- M M M --1
Q o O O O P o p 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4 W W o
LO
Z H
I-
C)
-O N N V
H Ln
H U N 10-
m
D F-!- f- D Dcc D D O W W
W D Z Z Z Z N 0 f- D D D W z W
U CL 20. d'1 000 W ON to 0In to to SnNNN/n N O..ZI- �
In Q aQQ moa c W WwI.JW W W W W Wwwwwwwwzow
W r- S E 1-r oa oa as H H H H H H H H H H H R H H H H N H U F W
� � J I- I-H r►-F r H N N•-►.�-r H H H F- :n
1'- d IL 21L W W O HHH H H.HH W W W
> JJ JJJJJJJJJJJ W W W U-
W �-d D D Q Q O '--1 F-1 �-! H H H H H H H H H H H 1-1 H H H H H S H h O
F- 0 0 Q m W W HF-NF-Hr-.HrH�-H44 s
a. w L.)LJ W as as DD»» »» »» 770033 a
W
w w IL zzzz a
W O LL 4444 0 too fn to 0 W
H oncomm W WW W W W _
Y O W
Z2 W= == U U U U U U
U U W 0 0 0 0 0 0 U'
W W T DO D (n to =man C1] W
T W N W W W W W 0 0 0 0 W W W W W W W
U O O O W Iil N N N fn W W til W W W
1. 11 IL 7 1 to fn N N N fn to
C Y Y WLJ H1"' I.- H
p I- I- WW W 047 cn N CAN WW WWW W U
2 l.f U W W w W W W W W W W W W W 2
LJ as a fY W 5333 a as 0_0_ 0_
�- F- OO O W W =S2 = 000000 W
H I- Y!Id Y ZZ I.-1+ I.- YYY YY Y UUUUUUUUUUUUUU W
O O 4 4 4 W W 0 0 0 0 Q 4 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
U U SSS !JW 0000 SSS = ST 0_ aa2a M m m m mm a0_ a h '
(n N (n 00 » fn 000 000 000 ,N NNtn t7 fn NtnN Ntn NNN to
0 o In In 0%0 U9 .'• 10 004• cc On 41T 00000 OO NHNW NIA OOON O
Op op mW%0M .- N V. It cc OO,N 0000000 "4 In 0\M In Ul In WH a%N0 MIn 07
�p W Hm07 `O 4'O N e0 M t00� Nm NNN NQ7 ..'1117 tCf t0 TM t0 I0 MOMO IO OO H
MM ONM HN CMm NJ N N N N IN 0Cm %0 W) W.l TPI)III LO M
/... H •i r O N .+ N N e4 %0 H N .-4 H--4 M P-
CD O ~
S
Q
J ;n in to :!)"7 t!'I to 117 'f7 o iC1 'n In:,l In cA :n �r N In ;!] to
,1 m x 7x7 ^ x W ccxc7 mm ccmmm cemxmmm Wmmx W mm v co
M '+7 M M M M In M
-114
a .+ .-1 .- .. .• ... .� .- .�H .-r -I.-1...- -r.y .�.....�1.r .�.i
a
Y c
Z
H
T T
U 71 i 7 i p m 7 ^ C3 # ^, O C: O p O o= p O i H —.-1 --.-I
1.^ In r In i Ln ,R'^ '7 'l7 ',n un -1 '17 i S.1:11 TI In v to In
m
cc cn N O
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
U U U U U U U
w I I 1 1 I I I
• a M a a a i
Ll Q # a # a # a
!' 1n # # i # a a
Q co
a w
E
V'1 a
m
M O
I a cc a>
N N
a a
7
? co co co e4 N N In rN10 M '+ r M NJ
I l i l l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I
• r N a�"�r .-/ N .�N N
O cC co,
co.'+N N N N.'i N c0 M -
Z r .1NM M a .41-0 M a o% 4 MM M M
I I I I II I I I t I I I I 1 I I I t 1 I
F- 0 0 0 0 0 0 G o 0 0 0 C o N N N N o p o O
M MMMM M N.-I.a-- M '.I M M M M M ol N
3 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M N
o v aao-� :r aaaaaa as 1 o- a a a s
U 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1
U .d.•.•r 14 .H .-I
a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t o c
z r.
O N
H N J
� 1- Z z z N S
Ll z z z z z z z --r .. .. �-. c.!
0 •'dF�1MNr...r 0 y y0y- c�Q a Q < �A cn N
Li «< 't « W W W W W< W� S f W W
JJ J J J J a a a a W < J
m 0Co000W adaaa0 ate. .. r. a LL 1- a
W 000000 d a dlLll O CL 3 3 3 Q z 0 a
1- JJJJJJ >>> 3 3 J :D '3 J o C O O 3
H m m m m m m 0 0 0 y y m N W W w W U a N
K
W
H
(n
c.^. as a aaa
Of >> 3> >3 J U W
0 0 0 0 0 0 a z I-
Y o C9 I, l!5 U' 0 W W W W W W F- �--1 U Y •+1
U zzzzzz 7 Q W x
w "•.r«+r-'rr " yy 0y 00 w • g I- M
2 z z z z z z y y 0 0 Cl)y « J E N r in J
U «Q Q'Q < W W W W IJ LJ U U Q O cn R z
N
1A W W W 1.1 1.1 77 3
O JJJJJJ m F-
0 U U U U U U 0 N y W N N W W W O £ V! N
Z 33 »73 FS W f. O Y
'w NN C/3(A y Uf Qlm mm floor « a N W S a W-
? YYYYYY KIY O J Z H O
w wir w wac JJJJJJ W W Y W Fr LL IL
«< a « W W W W W W a s a 2 w O O N H
F+f-H- - :3 3»> 73 T U 3 z
00N0 V1 y yy y y yy U)V) 0 y N 7 3 3 D
# # # i a a a a ♦ # #
CD M NO N OM O aC Mr a O O o o In IP. N N O O 0 o O O
T In.-1 in^I M %L M .- N M in 0 m O O O CD N N \ 1` O O C c Ir CT
.r 4O ;9^ to N1: a4Iz 4� 4'+s N o0 C;1; 17M MM OO T;
M to N N.-4 N �o rl.-1 .-I In .r N o O N N r f` .- rl I-n %a ID IC'/II)
z
3
O
S
a
W
L7 In :f1 .(! '7 f L7 L"I In!� :n '(`t,, '7 If:
a co co an cc al io =.0 mcc Cog Gcc COI YJ M C
Y_ M M N]M M "]
Q ..r.-I .-�r1 N rl •-. ti ti.-1.ti'+ .-/r N rl N .� .-/
IL o
0
1
O O 10 IL 0
U # N Nl N N, N ' a N N C'; N f4 N
L7 l...i n P In 1` J)
$ a I"�n n ti A # /� n ti f•ti i \ i !� i n a n A a
T U t .y^ -.1 .-I .r • .-/.y..•� .-!e-1 .d... a .� ..+ # .y a H ..a .r #
In M"^ • M i M • M M 41 M M M #
N N
It Y Y Y Y Y Y
U U U U U U
w Q + # # # r +
0 N i # # # # +
4 N
a w
x
N a
cA
M O
•
.p o
o m
N S
.- to
Z n O NMMM M M
I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1
• N 0 .i m N �D .� ^ .•� N N N N N N N
O r„ O M d. N N N M M M M M M M
Z ri O
I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I
F-. o m a m o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
M LLn M M M N N M M MMM M M
O
U I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I
Q 0 -•+ o N .-+ N o o O o 0 0 0 o O o
H
O N
H
H N
a m 5
o � o
C tY N 0 N Z z
U ? d y rn � > ?
W K g W ccW N
s w
z m z
W W h-+ r+ H W H W Q W W W W W W W
O N J H N !- ti r_ N N N N N N N
z W K
m LL w :> w J U. J tL O W LL LL LL LL LL LL
Lu o x a x H 0 + a o 0 0 000 0 0
F-
re I 4' w K w G'K w cc
., a. o 0 o a o 0 x a a n.D.CL M D.
w
Li
N
N
C7
W U U O F-
W U Z Z U N
Z H H z Q
Z W Z O N
U • • W O OZ - z
W o N S 1-t--t- W
= J z z a w s r+ a K
U rt. I,t a �-+ t,i W W W
w _ O
�. Iii J N n Q K fl N M W fY Z T
m K C w N
p 1- N c7 0. JC Q Q — a
0 3-- ¢ Y m m m m w
w Y !7 Y O O C H S J
W z L7 w a 7P. W (n lJ J J J J w
JN Y 3 7 O Y Y Y O Z
t� J F
J Y W J Z N N U w
Q M 0: Q Q W Q Q J -+ O W W W Q O
? > C9 > > 3 3 N ¢ 3 t7 m m m
I
#• #
1
r{p• O O m tb ID ID m In O O N Ifl S N Ill 00 O O O O O O O
to to d +t �Di to to 109
In 1Y J S 1O QI NN SJ MM MMMM MM K1
e-1•� MM NN .••' 4 mm mm co co MM OO mm mm mm mm %D
1('fN M1n NN MM NN CD CD MM mm NN %D 10 +r �M •tM � C
1- N N M1 n 1D �O �- '+ co 0 N N
�D �D mm MM J y
O m c0
S
4
LJ .'1 tf7 s V) L'1 !/1 to 1 f f
_J n fb b p cn -'A W 4') 30 m
y c7
Y M M
U-
0
>- o
►- z
•• .,
u Y •� # 'D i O i J Ln r m _. # ti + L':
T t « O i C O + N O O O m C O O O
U
-. 'n W LA r « �D # .0 u7 a a .� « .J r 31 cD b y .:; co C
T U .-• w .r i .-1 i rl r .a .-+ « n+ r ..i ^ N ti... ..1 .d
.• M # M # M i M M r M �+ # M a M M M M '�'% M M M
0
iJ
C7
W ¢
CC (n
a cn
a w
ZE
0 a
co
1
M O
.r •
CY, 0 0` V1 N D
.� a J !T �o O, O o co
ON co D l!') V\ Ll) O
• u'I .ti M M 10
z M N L17 M M N N M M N
rr .-ti J .0 .-1 .O M
1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1
• N '- N N N N .-i N N N N N 0� .r N N '- .'•� N
O M N Ln M M N N M M M M M M �-+ M
I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 II I I I I I I
f- o o O o ;n .� o O o 0 0
Q4 0 0 o p o N
N M M M M M M N N M M M M N
U 1 1 I i I 1 1 I 1 i I 1 ILI
1 I I 1 1 I
Q c o c C O O o o O O O O N o 0 0 ^ o 0
z r
o a
CL 1. U
rr f- <n o m m r-
z o ¢ m > >
u w > > > > > > > a > > a a
(n n LY N rL z rx c x N ¢
W W J W W w W W W W W W `-I W W W oz od F
O N Q ti to (n U as V) (n N V) to r-I N N
r J Q K J
s t1 .. a w w L. N w w LL w w w a w w z z h
w o a a o o � w o 0 0 o 0 = a o o .-I r-I o
M- K Q C of 0. O 0Y 2' S x T h- O Of (r x 0. O
0. U 07 a a N O a a 2 1 0. O 0 0. a 0. a W
5
W
F-
N
ti
U W U
W 0 z =
C O .r U
LL K Q O
Y Ll 0. to N J J N N y
U O f- W J d' O W z u U W
W x N r O O C W rz Y O ¢ H H U
2 U 7 K W O W N U f x x rr
U to r•' I,I 4 _fA Z O U! W N a p_ >
I-+ rn Z 2 Il_ K 7 IJ t9 W A eY. Q v K
O m D ¢ W W W W O 0: z a f- ¢ K lY W
C I•l z N S W 04 W W F -IJ ¢ Z f K x C.0(D N
z �+ z U W (Y S W H J W G
W +L' lL 'J -O V Z ¢ L1N J S
M W U OO ¢ W O H V U K
(n �+ W W tY Z z 7 c� Z of Z O ¢¢ H
0. 0. c C F- J C Q W K J 5 0: Cl ¢ w G.CL N
m ID th > >
M 4. • • i • i # • 11 11 4. i t • • • i.
O 00 00 00 00 0c O o 00 00 00 C0 0o IA YS 00 0UN o0 0 0 000 0
O O O O ID Q) r•.r C O O O I�h @ Ot) O m M M A .�• O O lT C �` lA lJ1 O O
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
IC M M �-4 r O O %V Q in LA �. O Ln In co/n '0 'o '0'D Q` O` O O O O �T �� M M A N O t9
lT lT M M .- .r a s r .• d v O M M In
d cc M
z . w •
Q N N D �
T_
4
i.J
'a1 T) :;l ;:+ .I ifs '^ r V• :n 'll U) �n .1 ',1 �.'� ,1'7 V\ •iT
0. D 'Z to w D D ^...1' D cc q co S D co D D.
O \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
Y M
LL. O r
O
U Y 'JJ fti Or T O PJ M 7 V\ Iz CO C, O .-I ^J
U 7 O O O 'y r r r1 N - Z. N N 11:N N
!I) W T. .b 'L co CCS X) In :A D X) 1^ 2J co
W
w ¢
0 N
a N
CL W
u a
p
M o
ti
I a o H
CO
a o 0 M
In M
• O M N
Z iP M M M M M M M N M
M H
1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I
• .-r N N N N N N N N N S N N N N H N
O Ln M M M M M M M M M H S M M M M N M
I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1
F- 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O C o 0 0 0 0 0 0
Z .-1 N 14 - H - '+ '- - � C,
M M M M M M M M M M M !n M M M M N M
U 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1
U H .r -� -1 H H '. r .ti .- H t� .-r .+ .-1 .� H H
Q O o O O o O O C o C o N O o O o O o
Z
O
In
� J
a o >
� x �
u > > > > > > > > > > u a > > > > >
n a 2 a Y cc [Y tr K S N r Y C K (I af
W W W W W W W W W W W �+ W W W W W W
O N N U, to Cn N VI N L7 N od !n N (7 to H N
Cy J
fLL. U_ LL- LL. UL U- IL U. LL U_ LL. W W LL U_ LL a
w o U-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o z x o 0 0 o a o
tr_ a: a: z c o c x o a
H a a a a a a a a a a u o a a a a to a
w
H J [n
J
Q J Z
W
O
z >O W _ Z
Y E N N d U U U
U lJ U ce M Z N O
W - p M W. _ O O
= 3 CL N
Z W Q 2 J O
U 1 W fn 1� to L.1 Y 2 7 Q 7 s- J Z Q
�. m tY d c0 v t.7 to fn Q Y li! M .r z �-+ n m
O O '� Q U O w O J Z O H C W W W
O F- '� K O oc Q Y C > H K W Q
7 N 4 Y Y Y Y 2 J O IL - H Z >
�i H
it L: U
W Z W W J J at "J Z N H
z 2 H N O •CL
4 4 C' -!Y a' O F- N H to F-
Q Q O Q ¢ O rr O 6 Q Z O C ¢ O O C
u ce Y N a a a
# i i 1 # i i # # # i i # i i # # i {!
O N to to In 00 OO OO In U'1 0 0 OO U'1 in OO OO p p OO O O OO OO to ;n OO
O n� �' C MM @'�T MM C`1N pp �D �G MM Co p0." MM Nin _MM MM 0o d �
N NN OO cn m MM t, Q` 11v m !n in e- p co co Ll M, (71m Oo MM
�L O O <t
Z
M
O
E
W n
co cc p cc p
x w \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
tL 0
0
r -?
., o
U Y .t !n iD f` p !!� p M N M d .n S 2 M .Y' -'
U
co p p CJ p p co p cc p p
p = !� N h 1� � N r ^ ^ t• f• n f• ti � ti !�
N
J
C7
W d
U �
d cA
a !�
Ln :t
cJ
1
M O
i a CD
O+ N
r O O ID
•' `O O cc
C 10
M M o O J M M r M M M M M o N N M
r. .-1 O J
1 I 1 1 f I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I
.-} M N N o o N N N N N N N N C)
O .•� .i M M o o M M M M M M o N N M
1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 t 1 I- ul I 1 1
H o Q o 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0M .-1
Z M M .-1 .-+ .-1 ti -1 .y ..y .-� N N o
J M M -1
❑ M N M M �L
coN M M � M
'^ M IM M .0 N N M
O .7 7' y' M M J 1 J 7 Y• S O' 7 M Q Ir S
U 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1
U
o 0 0 o O o O o O o c o o h o 0 0
7 F-
O N
G? Z x
a m ..
Z:) a a F r
0 x n > z
> > > > > > > > > >
<l cd N w C O tr C X X lr 1r Z W d Q 5
W > W W W W W W W W W W W 0 E £ W
W
T' > J LL L_ ❑ U a LL LL LL. W LL LL. L.. W W .r - LL.
W d r-. O O LL C7 a C O O O O O O O 73 :3 O
F-- 7 1- .v K W N O K ,Z C 0Y x O
5 z 'J
a a x x c� a a a a a a a a
w
Ol
M
0 a
r U O
O Z ❑ cA H
x u w z z ti n
U m O W N N H 2 J 4 LL y Z
W N F- J W 1- z W H M f- O 1-- C I.- LL N O Q
= O N 0 J w 2 1"1 Y ❑ ? 1- O Z S U Z
U m 'a �•' Z to K C Q
n^ r rr n rn 2 It T_ to S 4 nr 7 N P_ n 1.1
0 o (n Q a x rn v x a a .. 0 Q o a
C J ti W tY O U to W U N N W H K K
7 W C) F- 4 F. co W to t U N i>, 3 ti d Z
Ir cm C O Z H d Q N d
> LL Y W dO N 4' ti
K J .W 2 n K
x d J m J W W U 1-4 Q N U U z Q M i-- W J
U .^.': ❑ z W a r )- IY > Q lr Y W I- > -! t- J
4 O n M O Q W W ¢ C J H Q Q Q
K T a m 7 N Gl 7 _ f J m g x C7 G. ❑ 3 3 J
y • M y y y y t y t y y i yy y y y
O O O O N N O O 4p v O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O L n M O O 0 0 O O h ti O
N N O O %N M M O O %
O O C M 1 M M 1. G7 d C m m y1 Ln L7 In 00 c i � i O
-t.i o O IT O L,M cr CO O O U?1!1 T O� 71 M %aM M �O z co co %D�o �0 10 lO%O O
cc co 00 dC H•- CD CD NN 4. r dS W� 1I) Ln Ln -1-I OO MM
�- a y .r.•- In L .r-1 1 LT N N
Z w •. w
T
Q
W
a _ � in u t7 '1 :1'1 Ln
r x co m m x cc cc., x r"
Y � M
LL o
0
r 2
I.r
U S d S S '.D �?� O .-1
o- �r r a_ .� � .^ rn In �
w V XI ¢) N '71 S -i) m co cc O.
S A A A A A A A A A r► A A ti A A A A A A
Ni
-1 ti .yN N N .-•
M M M h M M M M w1
U
W 1
O +
w a +
Q N
CL w
x
In a
m
1 •
M o
1 a
.-1
.r a
•
z
0
z
z
0
U
U
a
o r r
z z ►»
D W J
LL E H
n o r
z z • J
O D W W
y LL > W
r O W U r r
Cl. ow cc o w aNN
N Z a W > Z 7
(r
v tLi.I .+ XG zarr
N N zUa. :3s -
W JW F- J 3QFLLOJ �
lr N Wcc 7: Or ;
WY z J" < Zwo W m = .J
W ZKQa9af 3Uc030 ).rr
�- wQ 2' K4Q I OQO� W rar
w
r
N
0
W
Y J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
v a a a a a a a c a a a Q a a
U
x 00000000000000
L) �..� F-�. r r. F- ._ r- ►- �- ti
Y
4
N r N N N N IO P.-
Li
.-W C O C O O O O O C O O C O O J
Z 2 z 7 Z Z Z Z z 7 Z 7 a :7 4
LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL O
r .
+
CD MMm W) y Mto) oo Coo Q,
C C N 0 N O O N -T 01 r4 \D o \C o O
♦ N
• • • • • • ♦ • • • • e
t� Ocn aD In l� .-i cc4- T T — o r.0 0
,O Ln N .+ N a * Q`pl. .d 7' cC .Y -
F. T O C K -1 O N 'D 1n
Z
n T 4as N O f+O h T
13 (71 P.N .-1 (TI
F N
a
fJ
W
a
n
Y
W
N F-
a
Il 7
O
r
U
.:1 W
N 2 +
T U +
N
41
O O O ON �-O ti O O N M O O M Lr\ U\ c0 O O O O 01 -� O ti
• O O rl -:t O O \O cy., 0 M O\ N -:1- O -:t O O -zt N O O
ccO O M 1 Lr\ N6 Lr\ U\ � \ r♦ O � O N O\ � Ln I O\
+
O\ 0 O .: l co rl N O M co M _:t I`-- N O O\ O rl M rl�
H O N N -:t N \,O CO O\ N M Lr\ N -t- CO 01\ O rl N \,O U-\ I -I
rl N \O N N N O SON co rl N \,O O
co
U -69- [�}
Q1 O Q)
0 O O � -k4 0. cd E t4 0 �
Cd 0 d co
Cd Cd 3 O O Z 0 �:5 � cd
rl Cd U2 U U N U Cd U] z CO -4 w �Q
Cd co 0 co F E r i W Cd �-1
+- I > I CA co I rd z7 cd Q) ri I > Cn i 4-3 Cn •�
O w 0 O N S~ N Cd Cd a I
Q) rl x ri Q) 4-� rH O N FH U1 rl 0 rl w 0
-P 4 4-3 C-� O +� 0 Cd ca Cn - �, - x � U
cn
Sa b.0 O cd o 0 cd N
U
O O Z N U U cd Cd r I O w N z 0 OU Q) Q) O
cd
C co +� E +3 cd W 4-4 +3 cd +D •4 CO PQ Cd r
O Q w O m +D W 4� m W 0 U N cd Cd O -P cn r. p W -P Cd Z
D H rl U rl U] a 0 H U U U] _ = x rl U U) r1 Z:) H a CO Pa :E
0
z O -I N M .-t Lf\ \.O CO O\ O rl rl N N M Lf\ \O N CC) Ol O ri N M
N M M M M M M M M M M -:t -:t -:t -zt -:J- -zt -:J- -:t � -zt -:J- � Lr\ Lr\ Lf\ Lr\
N N N N co N N N N N N N N N N N CV N N N N N N N N N N
O\ O\ c)-,\ CS O1 O-\ O\ O> O\ CT O\ O\ O\ O\ Ol O\ O1 G� 0-� d\ dl Ol O> G" D\ dl 0"
U r-I rl rl ri rl r-I r1 r-I rl rl rl r-I rl rl rl r-I rl rI ri. rl rl rl r-I r♦ rl r-I rl
0
G1
x 0 U) 0 z r (1) cD s~ Ua x O O (j)
Ci U U Cn Cd cd E S Cd U U cn -i
9z E rl ri a s Q) U -4 rl E - 0
0 s� 0 zH °O 4-+ 4-4 0 a) co 0 0 � W
4 Q) �H < N O O O S N <4 F 4 C (1) N d -14
U]
(� r CH >� E E� x 41 O Q. ;J Q) E E� U >> � 4� 4-4 x
UI N Cd H H W Q) U) �-1 O Q) E E H H H cd S~ Q) O W Cd
6 + ra a w PL, a Q 08 cH cd cd H +P bO P-, m F., a Z) ra Q a M a3
•r4-D-I •r-FD-I •.r�-D-I •r4-D-i •r+3-i •r+D-I •4-)r1 CH L» U U 0 �-q r-4 .r{ .r.{ .r.{ .i .r. .r{ -r- 4�
Com- N E E E E E E E 5.. cd f ,4 U r1 E E E E E E E E E z
Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) () v O Q 75 Cll Ill Q) Q) N N Q) N Q) O
P
x x x x U a a o U U? w =
cI] x x = x .: xX x x x x x U
H
z
z
0
U U
cl
p
O O O O\ \O N O o M O O o0 L\ CC)\,D Lr\ u\ CO o O o O O\ -:t O
� o O r-i -::t -t O o \O O\ -:t o o \,O \,O O\ N -:t 0 -::1- O O --t N O O
Z Cb O o 1; rl Lr\ N o M _:j r-i C0 \,O r-i O co O N a\ co u\I 0*,\
O\ O O -f [ co r-I N 0 Ll- M CC) O Lr\CO -Zj- N -:t O O\ O rl -:t M rl I
a
r-i O [` N -� N � CO O\ N Lr\ co N N [ -� co O\ O rd N \10
L(\ I r I
O .,
rI N N Lr r{ N N [_- N N C0 rl N \O C0 c)
� rl u\ N
LCN
00
-C{}
O O o O 0 0 o O O O o o O O 00 O O O O o o Oo 0 o O
r♦I r H r-I H r{ -4 --1rl r-' H H r-iH r{ rl r-i r-I rl rl ri r{ H H H rl
O O O O O o 0 0 O O o O O o 0 0 0 o O o O o 0 o O o 0
U rl r I r{ r rl H rl r1 H H r-i r1 I rl r I r rl rl rl rl rl ri -I H rl r r{
CO ¢ r I H .-I r1 H r I rl r1 Lr\ N M r-4 H r r-i H ri r♦ r I ri rl ri rl rl rl r1
c0 c0 c0 CO c0 c0 c0 O 00 N N r1 ri rl o CO CO c0 OJ (:0 CC) CO CO CO O
a 3•:
U
O O O O 0 o O Ln 0 r r{ O r O -4 r H O O O O O O O O O N
O O O O O O O H 0 O O co c0 --' o O O O O O o O O H
O O O O O O O r4 0 CO rb O H o r i Lr r-i 0 O O O O O O O 0 r!
O o o O o O o Lr\ 0 -:t -� O rl O r rl r-i O O O 0 O O O o O N
(U O O O O O o o H 0 Lr\ u\ 0 L`- O CO co -� 0 0 O o O O O O O r1
E N L H rl O M O\ H M o 0 o O r{ N r-i N
N M N m N N N N O\ r-i O o —1 M 0 0 O N N N M M N N N N O\
> O\ a\ O\ O\ O\ O\ O\
M0 Lr\ Lr\ L\ -:j- CXR H H ri CS d\ O\ O\ O\ O\ 0\ O\ a\ M
o
6 H H r H H H r ri LC\ti L M r r r{ rl H rl ri rl H rl --j r H H rs
L
03 CO co c0 00 a co O{ CO N N r1 r H 0 CC) co co C0 CO co CO CC) CO 0
c
U
S4
O
t=
N
O
z
.-t O mmff) �— l`
U m 00Lr\ r-I t`- rl rl I O\
Ln co M ti r-I coLrl\ O t
co N tf\ N co M �—\.O I -I
N O Lr LrIo
r♦ �Icc
U
A
r:
d N
�+ cc
aani m
H >
O b N N 4-)
E+
U co >
d' JJ
r rl •rl Q) Cd 4, rl S
t�
Ed-+I zE � u3r >
OI O O ni cd N td r�
E-f I C D U Q, X. U) P- H
� zl
O Z) r I ri rl N rl rl
F-.I O rI rI N l CO CO
NI
Il :�
U
U
U d
cD
U
47
E
U �a
> U
O U
� d
._j
G
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Buy Back of Police Holiday Time
DATE: November 15 , 1985
Introduction
The City contract with police officers provides that the City
buy back from police officers holiday time earned but not used
in any given year.
Reauest
This year we have received two requests. One from Sgt. Kenneth
Hanel for a buy back of a total of 45 hours and one from Officer
David Nelson for a buy back of 56 hours.
Our union contract provides no flexibility for the City in responding
to the buy back request. Historically the City has had a minimum
buy back both in terms of the number of officers and in the
hours requested for the buy back.
Recommendation
I recommend that we comply with our contract and buy back the
hours requested.
Action Requested
Pass a motion authorizing the appropriate City officials to
buy back 45 hours of earned but unused holiday time from Sgt. Kenneth
Hanel and 56 hours of earned but unused holiday time from Officer
David Nelson.
JKA/jms
TO: City of Shakopee
FROM: Sgt. Kenneth Hanel, Shakopee Police Department
RE: Holiday time off earned
DATE: October 30, 1985
I am requesting that the City of Shakopee buy back from
me any holiday time off earned but not used for the
year 1985.
Of the 88 hours earned this year I have a total of
45 hours to be bought back by the city.
Signed
S t. Ken Hanel
Shakopee Police Department
a
TO: City of Shakopee
FROM: Officer David L. Nelson, Shakopee Police Department
RE: Holiday time off earned
DATE: October 30 , 1985
I am requesting that the City of Shakopee buy back from
me any holiday time off earned but not used for the
year 1985 .
Of the 56 hours earned this year I have a total of
56 hours to be bought back by the city.
Signed: - -
David L. Nelson
Shakopee Police Department
,1v�tv:o CITY OF SHAK PEE
129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
l�
MEMO
10 .
TO: John Anderson - Administrator
FROM: Jim Karkanen - Public Works
SUBJECT: GI enn Heyda - Probat i onary peri od compl et ed
DATE: Nov . 8 , 1985
I NTRODUCTI ON:
Glenn Heyda has completed the standard six-month probationary
period as of November 8 , 1985 . He is a Park keeper in the Park
Department , who also assists in Street Department activities when
needed . We are pleased with his performance and recommend that
Council place him on permanent status , and grant him the pay scale
step increase that is scheduled upon completion of the probationary
period .
ACTION REQUESTED:
Move to terminate the probationary status of employee Glenn Heyda ,
and place him on permanent status effective November 8th , 1985 .
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Request to Confine a Blanket Easement
DATE: November 19 , 1985
Introduction
In 1933 a blanket easement for electrical lines was granted across
a large piece of property. Part of this property was later platted
as Terrence Addition. The property owner of L 3 (ex. N. 201 ) and
N. 25 ' of L 4 , Block 1 has requested that the easement be released
or defined within his lot.
Background
SPUC has examined the property and has provided the legal descrip-
tion where the easement should be defined.
The property owner has signed a new easement for the needed ease-
ment and the City Attorney has prepared the proper release of the
blanket easement across the lot.
Action Requested
Adopt Resolution No. 2478 which authorizes the execution of a
quit claim deed releasing L 3 (ex. N. 201 ) and N 25 ' of L 4 ,
Block 1, Terrence Addition from an easement.
JSC%jms
RESOLUTION #
A RESOLUTION VACATING PART OF AN EASEMENT
WHEREAS, On or about October 11, 1933 John and Anna Doyle game an easement
to the City of Shakopee covering certain land in the Northeast Quarter of Section
12, Township 115, Range 23, Scott County, Minnesota, and said deed of easement was
filed for record in the office of the Register of Deeds of Scott County, Minnesota
on November 3, 1933 in Book 93 of Deeds, p. 616-17; and
WHEREAS, Since filing the said deed of easement the land has been platted and
includes Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Terrence Addition; and the present owners thereof
Robert J. and Donna M. Brown have requested that the easement be reduced.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL That said easement
contained in the aforesaid deed of easement be released only as to
The North 25 feet'of Lot 4 and all of`.Lot- 3 except the North 20 feet,
Rlock l; Terrence 'Addition-to .Shakopee, Scott County,: Minnesota, according
to the plat thereof on� file in the office of the Scott County Recorder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED That the proper city officials be and hereby authorized
and directed to execute the said deed of release in according herewith.
Passed in session of the Shakopee City Council held this
day of 1985.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Prepared and approved as to form
thi 18th day of November?; 1985
' City Attor ey
1%0
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Capital Equipment - Postage Machine
DATE: November 15 , 1985
Introduction
One thousand dollars has been budgeted in the capital equipment
budget for purchase of a postage machine.
Background
With the adoption of the storm water utility policy and therefore
the quarterly utility billing, staff is now looking at an automated
postage machine instead of the originally budgeted semi-automated
postage machine. Two quotes were received, one from Pitney Bowes
and one from International Mailing Systems for a Hastler postage
machine. The two machines will stamp 170/minute and are comparable.
The Pitney Bowes is a larger machine than the Hastler and will
protrude 4-1/2 inches out into the isle in the vault, but it is
an American made machine and has been around a long time.
Two secretaries in the office have used the Pitney Bowes when
employed elsewhere and both said that there were few problems.
The equipment committee has met and recommend purchase of the
Pitney Bowes postage machine.
The Pitney Bowes was quoted at $3 , 179 .00 and has been reduced to
$3 ,040 . 00 including two $25 . 00 each meter adds. This is $2 ,040 . 00
over budget; however the micro film equipment purchased came to
$4 ,970 under budget.
Alternatives
1. Purchase Pitney Bowes machine at $3 ,040 . 00
2. Purchase Hastler machine at $3 , 295 . 00 .
Recommendation
Alternative No. 1 .
Action Requested
Authorize purchase of a Pitney Bowes 5600 automatic feed
mailing machine at a cost of $3 ,040 . 00.
JSC/jms
Oo
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Status of Minnesota Department of Transportation
Work Program Schedule for Contract Lettings From
7/1/87 to 6/30/91
DATE: November 15 , 1985
introduction
The City of Shakopee has been urging the Department of Transportation
(Mn/DOT) to move forward its schedule for the construction of
the Highway 169 By-pass south of town.
Background
For many months now the City has been working with representatives
from Barton Aschman, Scott County and other interested parties
in trying to get a portion of the by-pass construction into
Mn/DOT' s 1990 and 1991 construction schedule when Mn/DOT published
its work program for 1987 through 1991. The attached information
is an excerpt from the recently published Highway Improvement
Work Program 1988-1981 from Mn/DOT dated November, 1985. The
last page of the excerpt includes the monies budgeted for the
Shakopee By-pass project. The total money allocated for the
project under this work program is $14 ,900 , 000 and represents
the construction of key bridges and a two lane by-pass from
169 on the west side of town to 101 on the east side of town.
Summary
The inclusion of the By-pass in the published 1988-1991 Mn/DOT
work program means that Mn/DOT will now begin right-of-way acquisi-
tion for the by-pass. Mn/DOT has indicated they will begin
with properties lying in Jackson Township ( letter attached)
and will purchase property when there is a hardship. This means
that the City of Shakopee will no longer have to spend staff
time coordinating the purchase of right-of-way under the Met
Council' s program as we have over the last two years. Staff
will provide City Council with timely information on the next
formal step( s) we should be taking at the local level in regard
to the formal programming of the By-pass project.
JKA/jms
��NNESOTq
O - y
winL ° Minnesota Department of Transportation
y� . QpVNI m' Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155
vTOF TV �
November 1 , 1985
Note to the Reader:
This document represents a Pork Program =or aeve.ioping and designing
highway projects scheduled for contract settings from July 1 , 1987
through June 30 , 1991 . This program provides for the continued
preservation and renovation of State Bridces and Highways .
It ' s an extensive Work Program of projects selected by the
utilization of technical data and analysis . The program authorizes
the commitment of staff and resources to project development,
both in the Central Office and Districts .
It' s anticipated that this Highway Program will be funded with
almost two thirds Federal-aid 'highway funds and the remainder from
Minnesota' s Highway User fund (revenue from rotor fuel taxes,
motor vehicle registration, and motor vehicle excise taxes) .
Although the funding outlook could charge, --his program is based
on the most current estimates available .
Be assured, as these projects are developed, Mn/DOT will make
every effort to keep roads ,pen to tralf-fic during construction.
In many cases, incentives will be included in contracts so that
road work will be completed in an orderly and efficient manner.
Questions and ccmments may be directed to any Mn/DOT office
identified on page 12 of the booklet.
An Equal Opponunrry Enrplorer
i � �':::•tibt �
-
!
/♦ 4 ♦�, i�¢j sty', �ii'fiif
77 ty
1
t
P, II: • •
a
`k
}
4
i
' � R
1J
m
0
m
r
m
z n3i �1. ��iadd�O
m
3 con
to
�
co �
x
16
N rM O = rhrF-30 Firoq I� c n n "O ro Clroan £ F3 ro
It
:31 :r z x x n O ? = O �i n G- t.,. H. p n n O n 0 0 0 O• c
O a m b n "D w " 0 0 c "D O 0 O �.o LZ LO O cD O 33 O C G (D n
"
i n rt N OD (D fD T N N n Lo G• G" rr N u. g Lo O N A-
10
rt c I "o n (D N 0 "1 rt O rs 3 �£ £ <. rr n (D O r- n F✓ rt (D F✓ O
torr r <n w G L w a l a n n r Cu O n 0, %.o G')
n n rh (D n G O K G O ma \ rC 'C l< O n C rr rr "d c co (D
s O w rn Cl (D N n - nF; G " rr a (D n O co
z I-+u• n y O w (D O r O a O �G N0 1 rt O O rr G I
(D (D r• O n rt C1,.0 u• F r• G G r7 n 'C O £ (D r- n G G r• �o
a n o
n0 $< c 0 �o O rr Q, C N a w x 0 0 -- N rr o 0' F
Q, r LO 77"t7 : O n Co G = i O rr N 'C "o G Lo '^ rr • c 'C T
t a G G rr w 'U w r. I t✓ n rt O rl
_ r
H. rp n (D G, rr N I n �.o O n n G w r7 ul d r
r• Cl ;a n rt w � O t-t ? c (D Q, n a (l N (n r•�Q
(D (D p r• n r r• £ ro La O £ f n w r• (D N rr
(D G n Lm O (D a c n n c a I(D rr rr O w w rr :c 3
N (r 0 n F✓ El N n r• :E O w n I< G r• G O "(D
r• G w "O n 010 a rr O (D n C a (D
F' ac =r o �Ct7 cN (Dwn n � n
G r• r• n (D n N 7c N r• (D (D ro rt N rr F_j r• n o r th [:
Q, n rt Q, O rt (D H. a (D 0, 0 C n £ w r G 1-h (D n ff�
a r• O � (D O n (D O H- rr t-h0 Q, H- En Xwro O
]' rr 0 (D n Q, r• G 0 n G rt (D O G (D n 0 O n
w r• G (N w Q, 0 F-' rr O n G• n Q, w G ro Q, O >
- C O r. (D r• LO ►� n n C
N G G O G O p n rt rh "o O (D a' G H. n o
UQ O r• rr n w rt H. co (D N rr r• Q G 'C m D rD
:37
rr w � r a r- rr (D B H. (D co =; : cam
p p rh O' G N 1 rr (D r• :3' r• rt w a r c
Q, co r• r• n n N LO �z n n £ 5 O' 10 nrr K
p' w Q, r• (D O G ro F- ro (D w "O 0 PC O w
(p
" M G ¢, rr 33 rO Q, n n G Di 6< n n 5 a �- : �
,gym c £ "o "o w o o c , O F-' o a c o
(D w rr rr rr rr O F- rr u. W LO r• a C 110 C r• rr o n
C G 'C r- ? O (D (D (D (D r• n rt rt ::3
(D CO O rt rfi x a
w rt (D K x N nLiz) w N ? Ll, a Co Q+ rt O r h p
(D (D rr (D (D 1 fD n r• ro I
G rJ O ,ro c w w c t•t� N £ N O tT G w Q, r• n n
Di C Q,"O (D Q, n G rr O a rn w n rt F✓ N rt a
Lo
rr (D rln r• Q, co n £ 'C u Q, O fD O (D 'O 't ^.
(D F� W O O n = O O Fi
LLO nu• c a H. rr � r• tin O r_ LC) t•nr• x O a
1
ror• (D Q, r G G (D n F_ C N lD ip n 'O rt n G7
N w
(D G C (D LG G' G (D rr rt G' (D
Q+ n r• O H. n
I G N tC) 0 rr £ Q, n £ £ "O O (D O r• -�
Q, G 0 N r• w F✓ N G G' O (D G (D O 0 w rt L.J. G Q,
_ rt O ?'C C G w C G n 'C r• rJ n G (D K
a 7� ►h c rJ (^ K r• C (D J lJ r T. M O n O (D O
Q, tT (D O r• a F+ 'J G 0 m c r
ri G r E3 F� rr H
u. p n G �-- f� ul Q rr rt O 3 N N r s
rt V :3 £ ~ N ro
L n a rr Lan l M ro n rr 0 a "3 (D n tT i r p r•
rr rr n :30 a O o to n n 0 a rl G+ O 'C (D o
u. C (D O O G z`C Q, (D (D rt C r• (D rr N
Q, (D Q, (D lD n O u. p (D F-6< n (D rt n c :r 3
N N o E3 N 0 UI n w N O G G rt a rt G
w (D c' [n r rJ F✓ rr n (D x n a n r G (J (D a O r Z
G � O a G (D n rr F� r h a c c W n rr rr
T. O n ro (D n ~
G t-h Q, rr a G (D -� rr r r• rJ rs'
G r• w rr (D (D Q, n n n n rr r• F-+ G' N (D r• E
pt G N rr C ro It 0 rr o %.0 'C O G r•
FJ Q, O r'C (D n rt r• G (D LO w G Q,(.0 O a G rr l< L o
O r• O N Q, n m r• (D n £ O a Q' N
K N rl rd p LO a c r w I D o £ w rt rh w £ r
O rt T} n (D n a � Co ''O rt, (D a n w
t•h rt, O Ej a N "o G G - -.t n x 'C ro O `•C ro
O rt to (D n n Q, — O G "L3 rs nro n (D n 'L7 O
't3 rl •C n a L7" O r C rr (D N O
rr (D LQ r• rh .' (D r• G 'C W O N N (D n C)
rt (D B rn n O c y r• E3F� Q, N n LQ c O a 0
O
Orr w F3 G w :� G LO c, r. H. rr a n a G 0,u•
D'
(D (D n n n (D n E3 Q, (D • r r (D
GG
n r• w a rt G (D a (D £ rr r• G � O r+, rt
rr n rt r H. rr Z7 rt Q, r w N (D n 'Z3
= N N (D C a rt'C (D %.0 N (D rr n rl r- N O N
(D tQ �Q rl
r• rr G rt co O N c O O G
Fl- x 0 0 rr r• (D r• r• O m H c n C O £
G n n n r C 'C Q, n l n rh O r. n rt 0
O G
C w (D (D (D (D co"G rr O O G Cu Q, O r•
O G (D (D N a c c
__j rl G O n lrl CD r• (D "o
F� rl
N r rt O (D '(D C) Z O
H-
C w n (D r r C (D
(D p n O rr rm r• (D rt n p On rD H.
G rt (D u. n 'C r• a B n a
7r n
(D (D r• (D O (D G rr G
G N
(D n a G Ql £ G G H. rt La rr
n rt Q,W w rr x a
(D K a
N ro � ►� � � ro ncnro ro �
(.n (D kD %D %Dr• n (D n C >
n %D t.0 wm UO
l r � Hn y
M O t-1) con rt (D u.
r• O (D 0 (D 'tom 0
N n n rt n O U) "
(D �:l H. r- rr O
a 0 O \ K
►< n v
(D (D n
a o
n 3 n
(D 7�
a
U)
G
n
(D
MLn •AwNN NC) F•3 In O r• H 3
LO a (D (D 'D (D 4
QCT (Dan p
O 'TJ ro 0 0 U1 rt I--- :E: Q, O 3
rr G (D O O G r• O O C a
G• a 0 (n M O a n a r•(D u. (�
(D 0 Xrt M tO rt x GLO 5 O O
n rt fn r- r• Q, O• (D n Z
F.- 3 Sj 0 O n :c O W
0 O O 3 M r• In G O ri a rr C) H
O a z O M (D r• U) O (D '•C U) O
G a rt c .(D O w in (1. c
(D n n O O r• G M rr In n
r• a rr r• M U) n a = rr y
in-ca to<a (D r• a rr (D n G n N
LO rr N r• rr G O
N a to - O n a a rr 0 a , = a I- 0 Z
• �O�O a N M O rt (D O n r- r•rr
I— tD N :O CA n rr UI M (D r• rr M 0 rt a r.
rn r- r- r• N O (D M r•4•C 0 O
B 3 O M0 NL G O W Cl n O J
r r• r• r- t/1 G r• (� n (D — (D
,., ,� ►- � - r �� n -r- tea :3 O, a '17
(n (D a O O a rt (D N n
H. r• r• r• c a rt LO £ r- Ul O a O
O O O O (D 7 r• r- 5 n LQ 61,
Di O a O UO (D rr n
::3 w a _Ir
a
n ci •• (n (D
O N (D
G N N N W N G O n
(n CD LnOOUn a r• n 0 r a
rt dP dP dP dP dP O G M O (D rr
n O, rr a n rD
r• n n r• (D rt O ("
O a 0 G W r• n
x rr 'C3 uO rr o
N r• a r• G
G G a O a r-
W tO 7 G N In
• (D Di
U) o O,
t7'C 0 n (D `
n n a n s
r• r• (D n rr
t1, O a rr (D f
tO 0 Ul (D a 7;
(D N (D n
(n G r•rt
• Cb O Ul O
(D ra rt F
UI (D r• aOZ4c
r• a n 0 n
tO a w O.
::3 rt
a r
F + O G
(n n LO
- - i
D D TH Z; O o 0 o O I ><
C)�TZ { car No NO No 0 c I r,L
mm►,= A i' O� 0 1 0 1 zN IOC.
.. .. Ir
nmCm
_ C o. -1 coOo -i Co --1 coOo C r f Z A
rn Ln m --400 r Oo --I co m
r O ,y o 0 o A I {
i�N
00
co C)'a 1
tn--a I
-C3 N r r r 1
rn r o 0 o
Z N r r r In I •(
O
00 n N --1 N T 1 S
x-n O A I 7C
D 1--- n r D O I p
• 3-1 0 O C5 71; C)O, 0 7C C)3
A. N70 700 MO ;Q'D MO Zi 1
DZ D"'0 D D-0 DA f xff
N Om vm 0-1 u 00 1x.1
m mm mo mm m- I
T W T D T V 1 x
, N.J.% DN D I DN D 1 �+
O A-P` m m A m l m 0 1 -�
_ n 1 R'• fto Rd S Ro A I O
ml WX WC WO, Wa _.
1 7J0 7J� A.o �S
Z C)
av m> rn m m 1
W N_ C)
�. m �o X
Z N a a
o >< o
U)
m
c) o 0 z
N Z C
�• 70 Z 11 X
n W
MI . M M
r Z
0.4
Z N C)
v D m
N C I r
D N 1,
I C) Z
N m O
N O .
N -1
a
D N
0
m a
C)
m ,
ire*
I3
W 1)) Sa
W
i;
0 o c o ILe
F
of i o
I..xs
r+►-ADO o O o
NNC_50 o O o
-i A O x o o C 1 ••.
(�r n 7o I•
-��00 1 e+
ODCP.Z7 N N N ol i OCA
tltArD .o T V
I NC3 O o o 10
rn c o 0 CD
0 0 1
s G7.o� o c o
OooN I
r0o0
m
I i4
<.o
r
Eartan-t.schman Associates, Inc.
1610 South Sixth Street tvlinneapolis, Minnesota 55454 ' '"" 612-302-0:21
e -
MEMORANDUM TO: v'john Anderson
Shakopee City Administrator
COPIES TO: Jeanne Andre, Shakopee
Ken Ashfeld, Shakopee
John Mullan
Deane Wenger n
FROM: Bruce Warzala �"- u tw)
Barton-Aschmarn Associates, Inc.
DATE: November 14, 1985
SUBJECT: TH 101 SHAKOPEE BYPASS RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION
The day following our November 12, 1985, meeting, I called the MnDOT District 5 office
to confirm the shift in responsibility of rights-of-way acquisition with the programming of
the TH 101 Bypass.
My assumption was correct that this "Official Map" acquisition process no longer applies
once a project is formally scheduled by the state. Now that MnDOT has included the
bypass project in its Highway Improvement Work Program, it is responsible and authorized
to expend department resources (time and dollars) to advance that project for timely
contract (this includes right-of-way purchases).
Actual parcel purchases will not proceed, however, except for "hardship" buying, until
construction limits are established. Construction limits are usually firmed up enough to
identify needed rights-of-way during the early stages of detailed design (see tentative
time flow chart worked' up with MnDOT fnputj. The state prefers to deal with "total
takes" as opposed to "partial takes," thereby avoiding going back to negotiate a second
action with the land owner.
Earl Howe, District Right-of-Way Engineer, informed me that. MnDOT was planning to
hold informational meetings some time in December or January to explain the situation to
affected land owners, particularly those in the Jackson Township area.
If you or any of your staff have any specific questions, do not hesitate to call Mr. Earl
Howe. His telephone number is 593-8510.
jkc
i
O C7 C7 D O D E: 'n 4^v D
v O O in C) m T Z z p C)` O O O B D 5: D
Z o -+ Q. m ? S= D r v p� C, C nm Tn p DD-D 0 —_
O
C C) (T7 D D T Z r �� rTJ C)mm "I m 7 I TI O
D > G C -i to C T
w -n z m y r'il
D
n a r Cl) < m:.
v z
N cn —C Cl
�m
m
+� i mCD -10
JpJ
CD
N Cn r C.
O 0 Cl)
Z
O
L `,
-n
i D
D .a
co —�
C-
C-
co
DC)
Cn
O
z
O
L
_ D j
y CD
C- CC)
D �l
Cn
O
z
0
F m m 'il
m m D
R z n L CO
L
< o DCb
£ ' C:)
Roo O
D L
y o a K
° D
a•y� y � j
m a
L CO
m s D co
c
mCl)F.£ C-) m O
my O L7 Z
° D
m n C N L
c ° O 2 v L CO
C I
3 w N 0
m O
Z
?O I
w L
n
C) m
C) D
° � L
CO
c L CO
n— D a
m ^
� 7 O
6
Z
O m
10 �
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: The City of Shakopee and Minnesota Department of
Transportation (Mn/DOT) Agreement for T.H. 101
and Bridge Replacement Improvements
DATE: October 15 , 1985
Introduction
One of the first items listed in the City' s contract with Barton
Aschman for work on the Trunk Highway 169 bridge replacement
and Trunk Highway 101 interchange improvement was for them to
secure an agreement with Mn/DOT regarding the project. Prior
to my leaving on vacation I had indicated to Council that Mn/DOT
had taken the draft proposal for the desired agreement to the
Attorney General' s Office for an opinion. As noted in the attached
letter, the Attorney General' s Office declined to allow Mn/DOT
to execute the agreement for the reasons stated in the attached
letter.
Proposed Memorandum of Understanding
Because Mn/DOT' s District 5 is very interested in proceeding
with the project they proposed to submit to the City of Shakopee
a "memorandum of understanding" which is attached. The memorandum
includes the bulk of the clauses included in the proposed contractual
agreement between the City and Mn/DOT. It does not include
a clause which commitments Mn/DOT at this time. This memorandum
spells out the intent of Mn/DOT in the partnership with the
City for the improvement of the Trunk 169 bridge and 101 intersection
improvements, but does not commit them to it in contractual
form. When the City' s consultant and the Downtown Committee
have decided on a final bridge configuration and Highway 101
alignment we will have specific costs and a specific time table
for the project. At that point, Mn/DOT believes the Attorney
General' s Office will allow them to sign a formal contract.
Alternatives
1. The City Council can pass a motion accepting the memorandum
of understanding. The memorandum of understanding is the
strongest statement the City of Shakopee can obtain from
Mn/DOT regarding the proposed joint partnership on these
road projects at this time. If the City wishes to continue
it must follow through with the consultant and Downtown
Committee efforts to get a final bridge alignment and Highway
101 alignment with cost estimates and construction time
tables. I believe that the City has only two choices.
It can continue to get the required information under its
contract with Barton Aschman which is for $141,771 . 00 and
requires the consultant to come up with the final alignment
and cost estimates, or it can let the project languish
until Mn/DOT picks it up.
2 . The City can decide to spend no more money on the project
and let it die until Mn/DOT enters into a more specific
contract. As noted above, Mn/DOT has told us they cannot
enter a more specific contract until we have selected an
alignment, obtained concrete estimates for a specific alignment
and established a construction time table. This alternative
would shut down our efforts at downtown redevelopment not
only for the bridge and the Highway 101 alignment but for
any work that would have been done on First Avenue in conjunc-
tion with the downtown revitalization.
Recommendation
We have spoken at length about the City' s alternative with repre-
sentatives from Barton Aschman. Jeanne Andre and I believe
that the City must continue under the current contract to get
the information required if we are to secure the kind of agreement
Council wants to proceed with the construction of this project.
Action Requested
Pass a motion accepting the memorandum of understanding dated
November 4 , 1985 from W. M. Crawford, P.E. District 5 Engineer,
Minnesota Department of Transportation.
JKA/jms
do Minnesota < 1
Q Department of Transportation �� j
District 5
�P 2055 No. Lilac Drive
of Ta� Golden valley, Minnesota 55422
(612)z�tsc"�usfit
593-8403
November 4, 1985
Mr. John Anderson, Administrator
City of Shakopee
129 E. First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379-1376
Ke: C.S. 7009 (`1'.H. 169)
At T.H. 101 and
Replacement of Bridge #4175
Proposed Memorandum of Understanding
Dear MriAn"d"e r s o1a
As you know, Mn/ OT and the city of Shakopee have been working together on
a memorandum of understanding for the proposed roadway rerouting of traffic
in the Shakopee downtown area and the replacement of bridge #4175 over the
Minnesota River. A draft proposal that was agreeable to the agency staffs
was submitted to the Attorney General's Office for an opinion.
The opinion rendered by a special assistant to the attorney general was
that the memorandum of understanding with joint signatures on the same
document in effect is a contractual agreement and; therefore, the proposal
needed considerable work to constitute a decent agreement. Two items of
significance — one was the need to identify dates for the proposed work
and two was the need for specific costs to be shared by the two agencies.
Since the project is just in the early project development stages, it is
somewhat impossible to prepare specific cost estimates and splits at this
point in time.
Given the present circumstances, Mn/DOT recognizes:
THAT the City has by resolution passed December 11, 1984 approved the
expenditure of $1.9 million to jointly finance said project; and
THAT the City has requested and been granted authority to proceed with
location studies and an environmental assessment of the combined con—
struction proposal; and
THAT the City is now requesting that the remaining financial and project
management responsibilities be identified and tentatively agreed to; and
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Mr. John Anderson
November 4, 1985
Page Two
THAT the City is willing to acquire the necessary right-of-way and con-
tribute the up to $1 .9 million for expenditures for acquisition of neces-
sary rights-of-way and construction embellishments on the proposed road-
way rerouting of traffic in the downtown area; and
THAT the Shakopee City Council at its regular October 1 , 1985 meeting
reviewed the proposed memorandum of understanding and had one change
that has been noted in the above paragraph; and
THAT the City continues to support, endorse and encourage construction
of the T.H. 101 Shakopee Bypass at the earliest possible date and is
willing to contribute $1 .0 million to the T.H. 101 Bypass design costs.
Therefore, it is Mn/DOT' s intent:
THAT the State enter into such a joint partnership as indicated by prior
informal approvals and the authorization granted to the city to proceed
with same location and environmental studies which include both the city
and state elements of the proposed subject; and
THAT the State prepare the detailed design plans for both the bridge
replacement and the roadway rerouting of traffic in the downtown area; and
THAT the State pay for all construction associated with the replacement
of bridge /#4175 including associated approach work considered essential
to link-up said bridge with inplace T.H. 169 to the north and south.
John, this letter of intent serves as Mn/DOT's commi_ttment to the city
of Shakopee on the project development and cost sharing. I have dis-
cussed this with Commissioner Braun and he is in agreement with the
committments.
Since e y,
W. M. Cra. or P.E./
District Engineer ✓/
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Joint League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) and
National Association of Housing and
Redevelopment Officials (NAHRO) Project
to Support Tax Increment Financing
DATE: November 15 , 1985
Introduction
The Twin Cities Citizen League and certain members of the legislature
have joined forces to take a critical look at Minnesota' s tax
increment financing law during the 1986 legislative session.
The LMC and NAHRO organizations feel that cities must be prepared
to respond to questions and/or criticisms of the current tax
increment financing law with their own data. For this reason
and LMC and NAHRO have joined forces to put together a task
force to prepare for the 1986 legislative session.
Task Force Costs
League and NAHRO members met several times to determine how
to put together an effort that would have the most effectiveness
in dealing with this tax increment financing challenge in the
1986 legislative session. The results of those meetings are
outlined in the attached memo and the fee schedule included
with the memo. The voluntary assessment for the special League
of Minnesota Cities/NAHRO tax increment financing study and
lobbying effort for Shakopee is $1, 037 . 48 .
Alternatives
i. Agree to the voluntary special levy and appropriate the
$1, 037 . 48 . The City of Shakopee has made effective use
of tax increment financing in the past and has several
plans to do so in the future. If the 1986 legislature
passes amendments to severely restrict the law some of
the City' s downtown redevelopment efforts may be jeopardized.
The purpose of the study is to survey current tax increment
financing users to determine if in fact real cases of abuse
exist. It is the feeling of the League and NAHRO that
facts, not "second hand horror stories" , should be used
by the legislature in 1986 when considering amendments
to the existing law.
�. Choose to delay participation in the voluntary assessment
for the special LMC/NAHRO tax increment financing study
and lobbying effort. Council may be concerned that all
cities may not participate in the voluntary assessment
and therefore all cities will not pay their fair share
/01-
as
01-
as a result. The only way Council could deal with this
possibility is to approve the voluntary assessment, but
direct staff to hold off on the payment until we have learned
that a certain percentage of the voluntary assessments
have in deed been paid.
3 . Council could simply choose not to particapte because it
does not deem the effort in the best interest of the City.
Given our past successes with fiscal disparities and our
future plans this alternative probably does not represent
the best interests of Shakopee.
Recommendation
I recommend alternative No. 1 . Some cities are going to have
to make their payment in a timely fashion to set a good example
for cities that might fall into the category outlined in alternative
No. 2. If Shakopee feels this program is worthwhile I believe
we should take the lead by paying our assessment by December
1st. The City Council' s 1985 budget includes $5 , 000 for legislative
lobbying efforts designed specifically for this type of activity.
Action Requested
Direct the appropriate City official to pay a voluntary assessment
for the special League of Minnesota Cities/NAHRO tax increment
financing study and lobbying effort in the amount of $1 , 037 . 48 .
JKA/jms
. �C
�'LLeague of „��
�' y
II a
L�� Minnesota Cities cervinq Minnesotds14 "�,
o•oslop�nftdg
Tax Increment Financing
October 31, 1985
Mr. John Anderson
City Manager
129 E. First Ave.
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Earlier this month we informed cities that the League of Minnesota Cities and the
Minnesota Chapter of the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials
(NAHRO) had joined together to support tax increment financing.
A program of analysis and representational activities was developed. This step was
taken in response to resolutions adopted by city officials who studied the possibilities
of legislative action by the legislature in 1986 and beyond. The Boards of Directors of
both the League and NAHRO reviewed the proposal and unanimously endorsed the program.
The League/NAHRO committee retained the law firm of Holmes and Graven as a consultant.
Pursuant to this program cities have already received a questionnaire on tax increment
finance usage which will provide data for a comprehensive study.
City officials will recall that the League/NAHRO program is to be financed by voluntary
contributions from cities involved in tax increment finance. These contributions will
defray the direct costs of employing Holmes and Graven while the League would provide
staff and other services to the effort on behalf of the cities who will benefit from the
overall activity, but are not currently engaged in the use of tax increment finance.
This letter officially requests your financial contribution in accordance with the
enclosed invoice. Several alternatives were considered before establishing the
assessment formula. All cities which had tax increment districts in 1984 payable 1985
tax year are being asked to proportionally contribute to the cost of the program.
The two factors used are the total assessed value in tax increment districts and the
total assessed value of your city. Both of these factors have been adjusted by sales
ratio. Statewide totals for all cities using tax increment were established along with
each city's percent of that total. Half the cost of the project is assessed based on
each city's proportionate share of the total assessed value of the cities involved. The
factors used and the resulting assessments are noted in the attached list.
We sincerely hope that your city will comply with its voluntary assessment to help
preserve tax increment as a viable development tool financing in the future.
Sincerely, Sincerely,
Susan Edel Nancy Reeves
LMC President NAHRO President
-1-
TIF TIF AAV AAV Total
Code City Factor Assessment Factor Assessment Assessment
A
Anoka County
Y2 ANOKA 0.2088% 111.71 0.5707% 305.35 417.06
14 BLAINE (JT) 0.2843% 152.06 1.1173% 597.76 ; 749.84
17 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 1.5096% 807.61 0.6446% 344.84 ; 1,152.46
18 COON RAPIDS 0.2449% 131.00 1.3802% 738.40 ; 869.40
20 FRIDLEY 0.9211% 492.77 1.4672% 795.64 ; 1,288.41
21 HAI LAKE 0.0617% 33.02 0.2618% 140.08 173.11
26 SPRING LK PK (JT) 0.1539% 82.32 0.2105% 112.60 ; 194.93
Carver County
52 CHANHASSEN (JT) 1.7047% 912.04 0.3583% 191.69 1,103.73
53 CHASKA 0.0560% 29.% 0.3458% 165.02 ; 214.98
60 WACONIA 0.3019% 161.52 0.1050% 56.15 ; 217.67
61 WATERTOWN 0.0672% 35.97 0.0552% 29.54 ; 65.51
Dakota County
83 APPLE VALLEY 0.1852% 99.07 1.0016% 535.84 ; 634.90
84 BURNSVILLE 0.0457% 24.47 2.3164% 1,239.29 ; 1,263.76
87 FARMINGTON 0.1791% 95.84 0.1664% 89.01 ; 184.86
89 HASTINGS (JT) 0.2662% 142.41 0.4649% 248.73 ; 391.14
90 INVER GROVE HTS 1.1859% 634.44 0.7353% 393.39 ; 1,027.83
91 LAKEVILLE 0.3496% 187.03 0.6684% 357.58 ; 544.60
94 XDWA HEIGHTS 0.4450% 2238.09 0.5330% 285.17 ; 523.26
98 ROSEM0UNT 0.278212 148.84 0.3192% 170.79 ; 319.63
99 SOUTH ST PAUL 1.5869% 848.99 0.7579% 405.45 ; 1,254.44
102 WEST ST PAUL 0.0080% 4.27 0.8672% 463.95 ; 468.22
Hennepin County
114 BLOOMINGTON 0.9207% 49255 5.2813% 2,625.48 ; 3,318.02
115 BROOKLYN CENTER 0.1168% 62 50 1.3395% 716.65 ; 779.14
116 BROOKLYN PARK 1.5000% 802.52 1.7436% 932.85 ; 1,735.37
120 CRYSTAL 0.1818% 97.24 0.8413% 450.12 ; 547.36
122 DEEPH9AVEN 0.1078% 57.67 0.2702% 144.55 ; 202.21
123 EDEN PRAIRIE 4.1051% 2,196.24 1.6168% 864.99 ; 3,061.23
124 EDINA 2.0911% 1,118.71 4.1108% 2,199.29 ; 3,318.01
126 GOLDEN VALLEY 2.3748% 1,270.54 1.6473% 881.32 ; 2,151.86
130 HOPKINS 1.1658% 623.71 0.8628% 461.58 ; 1,085.29
132 LONG LAKE 0.1186% 63.45 0.0893% 47.76 ; 111.21
134 MAPLE GROVE 0.2253% 120.53 1.1030% 590.10 ; 710.63
135 MAPLE PLAIN 0.0426% 22.78 0.0625% 33.45 ; 56.23
138 MINNEAPOLIS 39.7185% 21,249.39 16.6815% 8,924.62 ; 30,174.02
140 MINHETONKA 0.8976% 480.21 3.0523% 1,633.00 ; 2,113.20
142 MOIRrD 0.0003% 0.15 0.3840% 205.45 ; 205.60
143 NEW HOPE 1.1261% 602.45 0.9895% 529.40 ; 1,131.85
146 PLYMOUTH 0.1978% 105.84 2.2772% 1,218.30 ; 1,324.14
147 RICHFIELD 1.4062% 752.32 1.4817% 792.68 ; 1,545.00
148 ROBBINSDALE 0.8740% 467.60 0.5205% 278.44 ; 746.04
153 ST ANTHONY (JT) 0.0231% 12.34 0.4013% 214.71 ; 227.05
155 ST LOUIS PARK 2.0502% 1,096.84 2.5945% 1,388.05 ; 2,484.89
157 WAYZATA 0.3949% 211.29 0.3938% 210.68 ; 421.%
Ramsey County
177 FALCON HEIGHTS 0.0531% 28.39 0.1965% 105.11 ; 133.50
183 NEW BRIGHTON 0.1828% 97.78 0.9933% 531.39 ; 629.17
185 NORTH ST PALL 0.1409% 75.38 0.3976% 212.73 ; 288.11
186 ROSEVILLE 0.2027% 108.46 2.1700% 1,160.94 ; 1,269.40
190 ST PAUL 11.3318% 6,062.52 10.5712% 5,655.58 ; 11,718.10
192 WHITE BEAR LAKE 0.0891% 47.65 0.8386% 448.65 ; 496.30
-2- r
TIF TIF ARV AAV Total
Code City Factor Assessment Factor Assessment Assessment
- e
Scott County
217 JORDAN 0.0465% 24.86 0.0832% 44.52 69.38
221 SAVAGE 0.5213% 276.89 0.2523% 134.99 413.88
222 SHAKOPEE 1.3587% 726.93 0.5805% 310.55
Washington County
245 FOREST LAKE 0.0340% 16.18 0.2145% 114.76 132.94
252 pA)iTOMEN 0.0578% 30.91 0.1779% 95.18 ) 126.06
Benton County
446 FOLEY 0.0288% 15.42 0.0337% 18.01 35.00
451 SAX RAPIDS 0.2219% 118.70 0.1375% 73.57 ! 192.26
Blue Earth County
511 GOOD T3LKER 0.0010% 0.56 0.0089% 4.74 1 35.00
512 LAKE CRYSTAL 0.0331% 17.72 0.0391% 20.90 1 38.62
514 MANKATO (JT) 1.6091% 860.67 0.8667% 463.67 1,324.53
515 0.0063% 3.40 0.0272% 14.56 35.00
Bram County
547 SLEEPY EYE 0.0282% 15.06 0.0724% 38.73 53.81
548 SPRINGFIELD 0.0316% 16.93 0.0438% 23.41 40.34
Carlton County
574 BA%1M 0.0028% 1.48 0.0061% 3.25 ) 35.00
576 CLOQIET 0.0265% 14.18 0.3105% 166.11 1 180.30
579 MOOSE LAKE 0.0022% 1.19 0.0246% 13.16 35.00
Cass County
655 REMER 0.0002% 0.10 0.0065% 3.46 ) 35.00
Chippm County
683 KXTEVIDEO 0.1016% 54.34 0.1233% 65.97 1 120.31
Chisago County
707 RUSH CITY 0.1223% 65.44 0.0441% 23.61 1 89.05
Clay County
757 MOORHEAD 0.8631% 461.77 0.6751% 361.15 1 822.93
Cottonwood County
830 91OUNTAYN LAKE 0.0183% 9.81 0.0360% 19.25 1 35.00
833 WINDOM 0.0473% 25.29 0.1002% 53.62 1 78.92
Dodge County
910 DOME CENTER 0.0485% 25.93 0.0426% 22.79 1 48.71
Douglas County
941 ALEXANDRIA 0.0014% 0.75 0.2656% 152.80 1 153.55
951 OSAKIS (JT) 0.0029% 1.54 0.0260% 13.91 1 35.00
Faribault County
978 BLLE EARTH 0.0122% 6.50 0.0952% 50.92 1 57.42
967 WELLS 0.0475% 25.44 0.0572% 30.60 1 56.04
968 WIMGAGO 0.0031% 1.65 0.0362% 19.38 1 35.00
Fillmore County
1020 CHATFIELD QT) 0.0008% 0.43 0.0474% 23.37 1 35.00
1027 PRESTON 0.0015% 0.81 0.0263% 14.09 1 35.00
1028 RMfORD CITY 0.0921% 49.27 0.0304% 16.29 1 65.56
Freeborn County
1059 ALBERT LEA 0.0426% 22.79 0.5182% 277.21 1 300.00
1069 H17L11 IDAL E 0.0024% 1.28 0.0106% 5.67 1 35.00
Goodhue County
1102 CANNON FALLS 0.0427% 22.86 0.0953% 50.97 1 73.83
1105 KENYON 0.0047% 2.51 0.0372% 19.91 1 35.00
1107 PINE ISLAND UT) 0.0233% 12.48 0.0551% 29.48 1 41.96
1108 RED WINS 0.6563% 351.10 1.1554% 618.12 1 969.22
A
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clem.
RE: Hauer ' s Third Addition
DATE: November 15 , 1985
Introduction
The final plat of Hauer ' s Third Addition was approved with a
condition that a drainage easement be obtained from Scottland
Inc. which allows storm water to flow onto their property.
This requirement is more restrictive than is actually necessary.
Background
The easement was recommended by the City Engineer to accommodate
storm water runoff until construction of the upper valley drainage
improvements. The abutting property owners are agreeable to
providing the easements on this temporary basis , until construction
of the upper valley drainage.
Minnesota Racetrack Inc. has provided an easement which can
terminate upon 60 days notice to the developer and Gene Hauer
Farms has provided a backup easement which will be effective
if and when the easement from MRI is terminated. The City
Engineer and City Attorney have reviewed and approved both.
Action Requested
Offer Resolution NO. 2473 , A Resolution Amending Resolution
No. 1426 Approving the Final Plat of Hauer' s Third Addition,
and move its adoption.
JSC%jms
RESOLUTION NO. 2473
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2426
APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF HAUER' S THIRD ADDITION
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that Resolution No. 2426 is hereby
amended by deleting requirement number 10 , "A recordable drainage
easement must be obtained from Scottland Inc. which allows storm
water to flow onto their property" , and adding requirement number
10 , "A recordable drainage easement, approved by the City Engineer,
which allows storm water to flow onto neighboring property until
construction of the upper valley drainage improvements. "
Adopted in session of the City Council,
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
1985.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1985 .
City Attorney
a
INCORPORATED 1870
*
ENG INEERINO DEPARTMENT
129 E. 1st Avenue - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 (612) 445-3:50
MEMO TO: Jahn K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Fulton Schleisman, Engineering Inspector-
SUBJECT:
nspectorSUBJECT: Fourth Avenue Easements
DATE: November 12, 1985
INTRODUCTION:
The release of an easement on east Fourth Avenue requires Coun-
cil Approval.
BACKGROUND:
A 40' permanent roadway easement along Fourth Avenue was secured
from Koskovich in 1977.
Recently, in conjunction with the Fourth Avenue project,
Right-of-Way and Easements were acquired along the entire length
of the affected roadway.
New Right-of-Way and Easements acquired from Koskovich more
accurately reflect the actual location of the roadway and meet
the needs of the City for road and utility functions.
The Assistant City Attorney recommends that the City release
the old easement, as it is no longer necessary. ( letter at-
tached)
ACTION REQUESTED:
A motion to authorize proper City Officials to execute a quit
claim deed releasing an easement, Document No. 155476, from
Koskovich to the City of Shakopee.
Approved f r Submittal
Ken Ashf d, City Engineer
FS/pmp
KOSKOVICH
Law Offices of
KRASS, MEYER & WALSTEN
Chartered
Suite 300
Marschall Road Business Center Phillip R. Krass Paralegals
327 South Marschall Road Barry K. Meyer Barbara J.Hedstrom
P.O. Box 216 Trevor R. Walsten Jolene R.Wagner
Shakopee. Minnesota 55379 Elizabeth B. McLaughlin Lori A.Lambrecht
(612)445-5080 Susan L. Estill Shelly T.Felaing
Of Counsel
Office Manager
Dennis L. Monroe
Wanda Brelmhorat
October 29, 1985
Fulton Schleisman
City of Shakopee
129 East 1st Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re: Fourth Avenue Easements
Dear Fulton:
Enclosed is a copy of the quit claim deed running from Joseph and
?Muriel Koskovich to the City dated May 3, 1977, and filed on May 5, 1977 as
Document No. 155476. As indicated on the survey of the easements along 4th
Avenue, this easement should be released, and a new easement obtained which
describes the location of the new easement area. Enclosed is the original and
one copy of a quit claim deed from the City to Mr. and Mrs. Koskovich which
releases the old easement, and also a copy of the deed which we obtained from
the Koskoviches creating the new easement.
Please have the original copy of the quit claim deed signed and
notarized, and return it to me so that we can file it with the County Recorder.
Please call if you have any questions.
Very truly urs,
KRASS MEYER ,STEN CHARTERED
11 rass
PRK/rf/eg
Enclosure
File No: 1-1373-157(a)
;. Ort Claim Dee E.
Form No. 28-M• Y,n,,n% RiAt Ge.. c `iwd 974)
Individual to CorPoratioe. I+tinnra+ta Uniform Gonver+nrmp Rlank•�Rc+i+ed 1970
cTbiv Inbenture. Xade this ..3rd claTt of May . 11.9-77..,
between.....-JOSEP.H.."....KOSKOVI.CH....and..MURIEL D. KOSKOVICH.......husband...=.d...Mlife...__
i
. and Staten ..........MinnesQtA............................................_...
of the County of.... .. rt, and ....__...._....__.................... f
parties of Lite first pari, and CITX....Ok'...S.HAKQPEE.,....a...MuI1.�..C.�.}?a].....CA7GPR.r'�,tiQtl..............
_. ...................................................................
... ....
..................... .................
.......................
....... ....... ..............
...........................
Minnesota............ . .................., party of the second part,
a•rm'pc mNvw under the laws of the State of....._
jBitnegg;r1b. That the said part ies of the first part, in consideration of the +um of i
One Dollar. and. other.good...and .valuable_ consideration-.n- .....DOLL.4RS,
to them..-. in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt whereof Is
hereby acknozeledlied, do hereby Grant, Ba.reain, Qtdtclaim, and Ccntxxl unto the said parte! of
the second part, its successors and assigns, Forever, all the tract.... or parcel.._. of land tying and beim
in the County of Scott and State of.lfinnesota, described as follotas, to-wit:
A permanent roadway easement over and across the North 40 feet
of the Southwest Quarter, Section 4 , Township 115, Range 22,
Scott County, according to the plat thereof on file and of
record in the office of the County Recorder for said County
and State
i
s
i
I
4
1
i
i
k
7
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON:
}
i
f.
e herctlitalnents
nd appurtenances there-
To habc ana tojolattlC r�t�,lnin�ott/tc soir/rp%rrf(/orf tlee second part, its tots succe sor and assigns,
r,rrh, I.,t„n-rrrt r)r in .r rtr/,tt.�rr.p)
Fw r r•cr. -
id �ariieS of the first part ha Ve . hereunto set their,...........-
a'.n jZcstimonp �n
JBbcrcof, Thr . I
g r] r t ,rr,r7 Yr,Yr i7m7 „bort trvi(tru.
&&Ga.
W
__..............._................_.....
Jose h J ko o�o.�
`Yy6.... .^
x .. n
_ M
Ste ®f Anne0olta,
Cow+#y of.. .... ..:M......_..-
The foredoinf irri.trument it-air arknou•ledged before me
tkia. s! day of....... Y..................................................... 19-77.-
JOSEPH
9..77..JOSEPH J. KOSKOVICH nd MURIEL D.
j i„1 KOSKOVZCHr husb nd d wife _
t�ME OF P RGO. ACC j LEDGED)
� -AA
Ll:k
C. ATVEE OF PEE )N t. C ACKNOWLEDGMENT) + '
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (nTLP OR LANK)
siP,.
�1' S_ HANARAN & MEYER CHTD ........... ......•
anw�
,'22 Fnnrth Avenue 1=
I
I
i
i
1
i
j
mm 5r.'479
1gr'�
d�44
-uQI°TA' ”
'o
� N
I
a �..• •� a - y a!i � •
z
}
ft
d r y — C` ► o
i ILO _ _
: "
ft
hob LGo
Norm I%o.36-M—QJIT Alm DREG D;mnesoca unilorm (,onveyancing Blanks(7978)
Corporation or Partnership
to Individual(s)
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered;Certificate C
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required /
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
, 19
County Auditor
by
Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ FXFMPT
Date: , 19 X35_
(reserved for recording data)
i
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, CITY OF SHAKOPEE, a municipal corporation
under the laws of
Ni nnesota , Grantor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to JOSEPH J. KOSKOVICH
and HURIEL KOSKOVICH , Grantee(s),
real property in Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows:
f
The North 40 feet of the Southwest Quarter of Section 4, Township 115,
Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota.
Subject to that certain easement dated July 29, 1985 and filed with the Scott County
Recorder on ,1985 as Document No.
This deed is given for the purpose of releasing that certain easement dated May 3,
1977 and filed with the Scott County Recorder on May 5, 1977 as Document No. 155476.
(if more space is needed,continue on back)
I
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Affix i?ec(1 `rax titamh Here
By
, Its
I
I By
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Ss.
COUNTY OF Scott
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of ' 19
by and
the and
of the City of Shakopee , a municipal corporation
i under the laws of Minnesota , on behalf of the municipal corporation
NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL(OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK)
} SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT
} }
� I Tax Statements for the real property described in this instrument should
be sent to (Include name and address of Grantee):
I Joseph Koskovich
3812 4th Avenue East
Shakopee, MN 55379
f
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY(NAME AND ADDRESS):
I j I
i KRASS, MEYER & WALSTEPJ CHARTERED
327 South Marschall Road, Suite 300
P.O. Box 216
( Shakopee, MN 55379 j
x (612) 445-5080 I
!
I
1 I
i
(
I n-lividual(s) to Corporation
or Partnership
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed not required
Certificate of�eal Estate Value No.
—//. -
ZE
County Auditor o
Deputy
STATE DEED TAN DUE HEREON: $ EXEMPT
Date: 51-� ;�-l , 19 85
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, JOSEPH J. KOSKOVICH and MURIEL D. KOSKOVICH,
husband and wife , Grantor(s),
(marital status)
hereby convey(s) and quitclaim(s) to CITY OF SHAKOPEE, a body corporate and not i ti c
a municipal corporation under the laws of State of Minnesota Grantee,
real property in Scott County, Minnesota, describedasfoHow•s: on
Exhibit A attached 'hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.
(if more space is needs ontinue on back)
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances Belo i-n ereto.
seph U. Kos ovic
"1 v In
Murliel D. Koskovich
STATE OF RIINNESOTA
COUNTY OF S C 0+4- ss.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Q Q`h- day of , 19-i5—,
by JOSEPH J_ i\,nwVTf F and MIIRTFI p KOSKUTCH, hllchand anti -uifP
Grantor(s).
NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL(OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK)
•MW�ni.'vrn+yytyy1Jt.'Vw'WvW.M1�VvV�n ! \(� C�L-Q .• .� �Q/1�i.-�
ROCHELIE fE1SarG ? SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNO�NVLDGMENT
OTARY PULIIC -MINNESOTn r' �� Tax Statements for the real property described !ri s instrument should
} � DAKOTA COLJN;Y be sent to(Include name and address of Grantee):
z SOY Commission Expires Juiy 9, 1991 3
■
^,nvt•,ti'v�v n
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY(NAME AND ADDRESS):
KRASS, MEYER a WALSTEN CHARTERED
327 South Marschall Road, Suite 300
P.O. Box 216
Shakopee, MN 55379
(612) 445-5080
An easement for public right-of-way purpbses 'over, under and across that part of
the following described property:
The North One-Half of the Southwest One-Quarter of Section 4, Township 115,
Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM: That part located within the plat of KOSKOVICH VALLEY PARK
FIRST ADDITION.
Lying northerly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 40.00 feet southerly of
the following described line A:
Commencing at the southwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of Section 5,
Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota; thence northerly along
the west line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 9.47 feet to the
point of beginning of said line A; thence easterly a distance of 5,290 feet
more or less along a line drawn from the point of beginning, through the
east quarter corner of said Section 5, and extended easterly to the centerline
of County Road No. 83, and there terminating.
Together with a perpetual easement for utility purposes over, under and across that
part of said property described as follows:
A strip of land 5 .00 feet in width the southerly line of which is a line
drawn parallel with and distant 45.00 feet o,outherly of said line A.
And together with a slope easement, with the right to remove trees over, under
and across that part of said property lying northerly of a line drawn parallel
with and distant 55.00 feet southerly of said line A.
EXHIBIT A
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk C l
V
RE: Developers agreement for Century Plaza Square
2nd Addition
DATE: November 14 , 1985
Introduction
The letter of credit from the developer of Century Plaza Square
2nd Addition will expire on December 5 , 1985 which is also the
expiration date of the City' s required one year guarantee. The
over lot grading and drainage facilities for Lot 1 Block 1 have
not been completed. The developer has entered into an agreement
with the Shakopee 84 Partnership to take over the letter of
credit for the work and the developer would like to be free
from renewing a letter of credit for the balance of work remain-
ing, which is estimated to be $2 ,430. 00.
Background
The Shakopee 84 Partnership has signed a "Letter of Understanding"
with the City of Shakopee agreeing to assume responsibility of
the improvements remaining for Lot 1 Block 1 and has also pro-
vided a letter of credit for the remaining work times 1250 .
The City Attorney has examined and approved the "Letter of
Understanding" and Letter of Credit.
Alternatives
i. Require Mr. Link to renew his letter of credit for value of
work remaining.
2 . Accept a letter of credit and a letter of understanding for
value of work remaining from Shakopee 84 Partnership.
Recommendation
Alternative No. 2.
Recommended Action
Accept a "Letter of Understanding" and a Letter of Credit from
Shakopee 84 Partnership for improvements remaining to be con-
structed in Century Plaza Square 2nd Addition instead of a
"Letter of Credit" from the developer.
JSC/jms
c P'" Norwest Bank St. Paul, N.A.
55 East Fifth Street
/VDRN'PSrBANKS St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
1. ` 6121291-2211
April 11 , 1985
City of Shakopee Amount: $3,655.00
129 First Avenue East
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 1949
Gentlemen:
We hereby authorize you to draw on Norwest Bank Saint Paul , National
Association, 55 East Fifth Street, Saint Paul , Minnesota 55101 , up
to but not exceeding the aggregate amount of Three Thousand Six Hun-
dred Fifty-Five and 00/100 United States Dollars ($3,655.00) for the
account of Shakopee 184 Partnership. Available by your draft(s) At
Sight when accompanied by:
A signed statement from the City of Shakopee that
the Shakopee '84 Partnership is in default of the
terms of a letter agreement dated December 6, 1984
between the Shakopee '84 Partnership and the City
of Shakopee.
Drafts under this Letter of Credit must bear upon their face the words:
DRAWN UNDER NORWEST BANK SAINT PAUL, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION LETTER OF
CREDIT NO. 1949 DATED April 11 , 1985.
We hereby agree with drawers, endorsers and bona fide holders of
drafts negotiated under and in compliance with the terms of this
credit that the same will be duly honored if drawn and presented at
this office on or before April 11 , 1986.
Except so far as otherwise expressly stated, this credit is subject
to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1983
Revision) International Chamber of Commerce, Brochure 400.
Very truly yours,
NORWES BANK INT PAUL, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Vice Pre ident
Letter of Understanding
Re : Century Plaza Square 2nd Addition
The Shakopee 84 Partnership has entered into an agreement with
Cletus J . Link to take over the letter of credit for the work to
be done in the future for Lot 1 Block 1 , Century Plaza Square 2nd
Addition as contained in the developers agreement dated October 16 ,
1984 between the City of Shakopee and Cletus J . and Helen C. Link.
The Shakopee 84 Partnership hereby understands and agrees to take
over and assume all responsibility of the above described developers
agreement with respect to Lot 1 Block 1 of Century Plaza Square 2nd
Addition only.
Dated this day of 1984.
City of Shakopee
Sha 4 Par rship
by
Mayor b
b
ity Aministrator by '
by
ity erK
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg VoxIand, Finance Director
RE: Farm Leases U
DATE: November 13, 1985
Introduction and Background
The City has three farm leases up for renewal. They are with Gene Hauer,
Larry Theis and John Weidt. The terms and conditions are the same with the
following exceptions; 1.) The rental from John Weidt (by the mall) is increased
from $1,200 to $1 ,300. 2.) The rental rate per acre offered by Larry Theis
is $10, the 1984 rate was $25, 1985 rate was reduced to compensate for overcharging
due to an error in the number of acres leased. The City has found no one
interested in this parcel other than Mr. Theis in the past and someone else
would have to cross developed park land to get to the field. There are 7 .5
acres in the field. The area immediately south of the picnic area in Lions
Park will be planted with grass and have an expanded nursery in 1986. Staff
recommends that this be the last year for a farm lease for this parcel.
Action reauested
Move to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute farm leases for
City property with Gene Hauer, Larry Theis and John Weidt.
.tet; '�'•f
CITY OF SRAKOPEE
129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
MEM O ,���
TO: John Anderson & Ci ty Counci 1
r-tOM:J i m Karkanen - Public Works
SUBJECT:Contractor Plow Assi � t ance
DATE: Nov . 1 , 1985
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:
Permission from the City Council is needed to enter into an agreement
with S. M. Hent ges & Sons ( TRI -S) of Shakopee for assistance in plowing
a portion of the Eagle Creek rural area . This assistance from this
contractor was utilized last year , also .
Because of manpower and equipment shortages , it is practically
impossible to meet the public demand for service in the Eagle Creek area
in a timely manner unless a portion of the plowing responsibilities is
shared by an i ndep.endent contractor .
By splitting the priorities in this area , we can meet public demand
by at least getting the rural roadways open , then coming back later t o
widen , wing , and sand these roadways when time permits .
The contractor is used only for emergency situations , as determined
by City officials . As a rule , we consider a snowfall over 3" as an
emergency condition . These contractual services can also be used for
natural disasters , such as tornadoes , etc .
ACTION NEEDED:
Allow City officials to enter int o an agreement with S. M. Hent ges & Son
( TRI-S) for contractual assistance under emergency conditions , as directed
by City officials .
CITY OF SHAKOP -E-3 -E-3
INCORPORATED 1870
129 E. First Ave. - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650
RENTAL QUOTATIONS FOR EMERGENCY CONDITIONS
Nov . 15 , 1985 to Nov . 15 , 1986
CONTRACTOR: Tri -S, Steven M. Hent ge s Co . , Inc . Shakopee , Minn . 55379
EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: PRICE PER HOUR
----------------
------ -----------------
--
1 ton trucks - 8' Plow $ 45 . 00/hr
Bobcats 43 . 00/hr
John Deere 510 13-21' Plow 58 . 00/hr
950 Loader 63 . 00/hr
966 Cat . Loader 78 . 00/hr
950 Loader w/snow blower 140. 00/hr
Cat 120 Motor Grader W/wing & Plow 58 . 00/hr
Tandem dump truck W/10' one way plow 55 . 00/hr
Tandem Dump Truck ( Haul snow) 40. 00/hr
Tri axl e Dump Truck 46 . 00/hr
( Rates 1 i st ed are at straight time- overtime will not be paid for rent al )
1 . Emergency conditions could include natural disasters such as floods
or tornadoes in addition to snowfall , etc .
2 . The cont ract or shal 1 f urni sh t he operat or , f uel requi red , cert i f i cat e
of insurance , and shall assume repair costs incurred .
3 . A represent at i ve of t he Ci t y of Shakopee wi 11 not i f y t he cont ract or
of t he st art i ng t i me and t he t ype of equi pment t hat i s needed . The
type and amount of equipment needed wi 1 1 depend upon the weather
conditions and circumstances .
-----------------
DATE CONTRACTOR
----------------- accepted
DATE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
The 1-1 c ,7 r t o f P r o t7 r e s s �� Q / / 0 11
104)
INCORPORATED 1870
* ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
129 E. 1st Avenue - 5hakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Adminisitx for
FROM: Ken Ashfeld, City Enginee 'oor--^^
SUBJECT: Traffic Control on Agpar Street
DATE: November 14, 1985
INTRODUCTION:
At their November, 6, 1985 meeting, the City Council directed
the Police Chief and City Engineer to review:
1. Traffic and speed control on Apgar Street between
1st Avenue and 6th Avenue.
2. Signage at 4th, 5th, and Gth Avenue.
3. Speed control on alley west of St. Francis Hospital
between 4th and 5th Avenues.
BACKGROUND :
Apgar Street serves as a local street with Municipal State
Aid Street designation from 1st Avenue to 6th Avenue. Apgar
Street has a County Road (County Road 77) designation south
of Gth Avenue.
Apgar Street provides traffic with direct flow from Gth Avenue
to 1st Avenue with intersecting streets in a stop or yield
condition.
Previously, the City Council at their October 15, 1985 meeting
directed staff to conduct a comprehensive City-wide traffic
control and intersection signage study. The portion of Apgar
Street under consideration here is within an area that requires
special attention during that study.
The speed limit on alleys within the City of Shakopee, as go-
verned by state statute is 10 MPH. The speed limit on Apgar
Street is 30 MPH.
APGAR STREET
NOVEMBER 14, 19E'S
PAGE 2
RECOMMENDATIONS :
1. Staff recommends: That no additional signage be placed
on Apgar Street at the present until the City-wide traffic
control and intersection signage study is completed.
2. That the existing traffic control signage at the inter-
sections of 4th, 5th, and 6th Avenues remain as in-place.
That 10 MPH speed limit signs be placed in the alley between
4th and 5th Avenues. This is not to condone that speed limit
signs be placed in every alley in the City of Shakopee, only
identified, iso1ated problem areas.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer a motion to direct staff to place 10 MPH speed limit
signs in the alley west of the St. Francis Hospital between
4th and 5th Avenues.
KA/pmp
APGAR
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator r'
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk _y.�
RE: Appointment of Election Judges
DATE: November 14, 1985
Introduction
Scott County is planning a special election on December 17 , 1985 .
It is necessary for Council to appoint individuals to serve as
election judges for this election at this time.
Background
The attached resolution appoints election judges to serve at
the December 17th election. The individuals have all been
contacted and agreed to serve. They have all worked as election
judges in the past.
Bea Simon, first precinct, is a sister to Tom Hennen. Paulette
Rislund, second precinct, was a member of the Scott County
Government Study Commission. I have checked with Mr. Krass and
he has assured me that both women are eligible to serve as
election judges. Both women are willing to work for the
upcoming special election on December 17th.
Action Requested
Offer Resolution No. 2471 , A Resolution Appointing Judges
of Election, and Establishing Compensation, and move its
adoption.
JSC/jms
RESOLUTION NO. 2471
L
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING JUDGES OF ELECTION,
AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA, that:
1. The following persons are hereby appointed Judges of Election
for the five polling precincts within the City of Shakopee
designated in Resolution No. 2021 , adopted July 6 , 1982 :
FIRST PRECINCT
Regular Judges Winnie Anderson, Chrm.
Dorothy Breimhorst Susan Niewind
Ruth O'Reilley Marie Kocks
Add' 1 Judges Joan Hart Marcie Schmitt
Berdie Hartman Bea Simon
SECOND PRECINCT
Regular Judges Marcia Spagnolo,Co-Chrm.
Beryl Barrett Carol Bishop
Barbara Runge
Add' 1 Judges Paulette Rislund, Co-Chrm.
Marilyn Lang Connie Berens
Joanne Kruger
THIRD PRECINCT
Regular Judges Maetta Jurewicz , Chrm.
Joyce Schwartz Loretta Jaspers
Marinda Schmit
Add' 1 Judges LeVaun Schmitt Bernadette Gerlach
Candy Kragthorpe
FOURTH PRECINCT
Regular Judges Glenda Spiotta, Co-Chrm.
Diane Karst Sylvester Gerold
Helen O' Brien
Add' 1 Judges Lillian Weinandt, Co-Chrm.
Marie Czaja Marge Bischoff
Dolores; Morke
FIFTH PRECINCT
Regular Judges Virgilla Geske, Chrm.
Rudy Maurine Carol Link
Add' 1 Judges Rita Steinhoff Brenda Fonder
Pat Pass
2. The Election Judges shall be compensated for their work
at the rate of $3 . 40 per hour and the Chairman of the Election
Judges shall be compensated at the rate of $3 . 90 per hour.
3 . The proper officials be and hereby are authorized and directed
to do and perform all acts necessary to carry out the terms,
intents, and purposes of this Resolution.
Adopted in session of the City Council
of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
1985 .
ATTEST: Mayor of the City of Shakopee
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1985.
City Attorney
r,
Memo To: Mayor and City Council � f
From: John R. Anderson, City Administrator
Re: Resolution Establishing a Pay & Benefit Agreement for the Police
Sergeants for 1985.
Date: November 14, 1985
Introduction
Each time the City Council negotiates a new labor agreement with Local 320
for the Police Department, the City updates its agreement with the Police
Sergeants. With the recent approval of a contract with Local 320 for 1985
it is necessary to update our current agreement with the Police Sergeants.
Background
The contract approved by Council for the Police Officers established wage
and benefit increases. To insure that the same increases are available to
the sergeants the attached Resolution No. 2468 must be approved. Clause No. 2
simply puts the 5.2% annual adjustment into the sergeants compensation rate
to insure that their net increase in compensation for 1985 is 5 .2%.
Alternatives
1. Approve Resolution No. 2468. Approval of this Resolution would be consistent
with Council's action during the past several years and would mean that
we do not have to spent time negotiating a separate agreement with the
sergeants.
2. Do not approve Resolution No. 2468 in its present form and/or amend the
Resolution as presented. Any changes to Resolution No. 2468 would mean
a break with past practices and would require negotiating sessions with
the Sergeants.
Recommendation
I recommend Alternative No.l for the reasons listed above.
Action Requested
Approve Resolution No. 2468, A Resolution Establishing a Pay and Benefit Agreement
for Police Sergeants for 1985.
RESOLUTION 2468
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A PAY AND BENEFIT
AGREEMENT FOR POLICE SERGEANTS FOR 1985
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee wishes to establish
a formal pay and benefit agreement for Police Sergeants in. the City of Shakopee,
and
WHEREAS, said Police Sergeants wish to establish a formal pay and benefit
agreement with the City of Shakopee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,
MINNESOTA:
1. That said 1985 pay and benefit agreement for the Police Sergeants
is inclusive of the pay and benefits in Local No. 320's labor agreement
with Police Officers effective January 1, 1985 through December 31,
1985.
2. That police Sergeants be compensated at the rate of $173 per month
over top patrolman for the first 12 months in grade and, thereafter
$288 per month over top patrolman, retroactive to January 1, 1985.
3. That said Police Sergeants understand and acknowledge their responsibilty
to effectively evaluate those they supervise as directed by the Chief
of Police.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Resolution No. 2325 be rescinded in it's
entirety.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this day of 1 1985.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of 1985.
City Attorney
Det. Sgt. John J. DuBois
Sgt. Kenneth F. 'Hanel
Sgt. Richard R. :Kaley
Sgt. Dennis Anderson
Councilmember introduced the
following resolution, the reading of which was dispensed
with by unanimous consent , and moved its adoption:
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
COUNTY OF SCOTT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON THE AMENDMENT
OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN RELATING TO MINNESOTA
RIVER VALLEY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO.
1; THE AMENDMENT OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NO. 2
THROUGH NO. 5; ESTABLISHING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ADOPTING THE TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ( the "Council" ) of
the City of Shakopee,Minnesota (the "City" ) , as follows:
Section 1. Public Hearing. At the request of the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota (the "Authority" ) ,_ ' s, uncil shall
meet on Tuesday, December 3, 1985, at to hold a
public hearing on the following matters : (a) the amendment
of the Redevelopment Plan relating to the Authority ' s Minne-
sota River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1
( the "Project" ) , (b) the establishment by the Authority of
Tax Increment Financing District No. 6 (hereinafter referred
to as the "Tax Increment Financing District" ) within the
Project, (c) the adoption of the proposed Tax Increment
Financing Plan for the Tax Increment Financing District, and
(d) the amendment of the tax increment financing plans for
Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 through No. 5 , all
pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes , Sec-
tions 462. 411 to 462 .716, inclusive, as amended, Minnesota
Statutes, Section 273 . 74, subd. 4 , as amended, and Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 273 .71 to 273 .78 , inclusive, as amended.
Section 2 . Notice of Hearing; Filing of Plans . The
Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the
hearing, substantially in the form attached hereto as Ex-
hibit A, to be given as required by law, to place a copy of
the proposed Redevelopment Plan and proposed Tax Increment
Financing Plan on file in the City Clerk ' s office and to
make such plans available for inspection by the public,
commencing November 20, 1985 .
J ^
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, on November 19 , 1985 .
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by Councilmember ,
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof :
and the following voted against the same :
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and
adopted, and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the
City Clerk.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
2 -
EXHIBIT A
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
COUNTY OF SCOTT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council ( the "Coun-
cil" ) of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, will hold a public
hearing on Tuesday, December 3 , 1985 , at a regular meeting
of the Council commencing at 7 : 30 o ' clock p.m. , to be held
at the Shakopee City Hall relating to the amendment by the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota ( the "Authority" ) , of its Redevelopment
Plan relating to Minnesota River Valley Housing and Rede-
velopment Project No. 1 ( the "Project" ) and the establish-
ment of the Authority' s Tax Increment Financing District No.
6 within the Project, all pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 462. 411 to 462.716, inclusive, as amended, Minne-
sota Statutes, Section 273 . 74, subd. 4, as amended, and
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273 .71 to 273 .78, inclusive, as
amended. The hearing is also relative to the adoption of
the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment
Financing District No. 6 and the amendment of the tax incre-
ment financing plans for the Authority ' s existing Tax Incre-
ment Financing Districts No. 2 through No. 5, copies of
which changes will be on file and available for public
inspection in the City Clerk ' s office not later than
November 20, 1985 .
A - 1
1
Clerk ' s Certificate
I , the undersigned, being duly qualified and acting
Clerk of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, hereby certify
that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing
resolution with the original thereof on file in my office and
further certify that the same is a full, true and complete
transcript therefrom, insofar as the same relates to the
calling of a public hearing on a proposal for the amendment
of the Redevelopment Plan relating to Minnesota River Valley
Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1, the creation of Tax
Increment Financing District No. 6 , the adoption of the
proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto, and
the amendment of the Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax
Increment Financing Districts No. 2 through No. 5 .
I further certify that said resolution was duly adopted
by the Shakopee City Council at a duly called and regularly
held regular or special meeting thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such Clerk and the cor-
porate seal of the City this day of 1985 .
City Clerk
Shakopee, Minnesota
r
C)TTL AND INQ
November 15 , 1985
Mayor Eldon Reinke and
Members of the City Council
City of Shakopee
129 E. First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
RE: Canterbury Business Park
First Addition
Plat Approval Scheduled
for November 19 , 1985
Dear Mayor Reinke and
Members of the City Council:
The Shakopee Planning Commission has granted preliminary and
final plat approval for the subdivision of four lots west of
County Road 83, north of the proposed Bypass and south of the
southerly access road to the racetrack. We have agreed to all
recommendations of staff and Planning Commission. We ask that
you approve the preliminary and final plat at your meeting of
November 19 , 1985 so that we can file the plat, obtain the
grading permit to commence construction of the internal road,
and to grade the hotel site (Block 2 , Lot 2 ) within the plat.
The grading will require one to two weeks. Thereafter, we will
obtain the building permit for the hotel and commence
construction on or about December 2, 1985 . This schedule will
enable us to have the first units ready for occupancy on May 1 ,
1986 when the racing season opens. Completion of the other
units would be made available throughout the summer and fall of
1986.
The total cost of the project will be approximately $8 ,000 ,000 ,
contributing to the City ' s tax base and tax increment revenues.
5244 Valley Industrial Boulevard South, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379/612-445-3242
City of Shakopee
November 15 , 1985
Page 2
Set forth in the attached memo is a detailed discussion of the
plat and the proposed hotel. The hotel is a permitted use in
the B-1 , Highway Business District.
If you have any questions, please call.
Very truly yours,
Bruce D. Malkerson
Executive Vice President
Timothy J , cane
Vice President
BDM:ap
Attachment
C. C. John Anderson
Jeanne Andre
Judi Simac
Julius Coller
Rod Krass
Ken Ashfeld
1 . Background
In 1973 Scottland Inc. purchased the property proposed to be
platted and other property known as Valley Industrial Park
(Park) .
Thereafter, Brooks Hauser and others from Scottland Inc. met
with City staff, Planning Commission and Council to determine
the future development patterns within the Park. The City
desired to zone the property at the future intersection of the
Bypass and County Road 83 to commercial, since it would be one
of the front doors into the City and would not adversely affect
the developing industrial uses within the Park.
Thereafter, the property was zoned to commercial and the
Comprehensive Plan supported that zoning.
2 . Tax Increment District
In 1979 , Brooks Hauser and representatives of the City
worked together to attract the K-Mart development to the Park
and created the K-Mart Tax Increment District 1 in support
thereof. The K-Mart Tax Increment District 1 was extended
across County Road 83 and extended southerly to include the
property north and south of the Bypass intersection, including
the property to be platted (See enclosed map) in order to
include the tax revenues from the future commercial
development. The K-Mart Tax Increment District 1 runs 30 years
from 1979 to 2009 , and all tax revenues generated therein during
that time period are available for use for public purposes in
that district and in the Minnesota River Valley Housing and
Development District No. 1 . As a general rule, at today' s mil
rates, one million dollars of additional estimated market value
within the district will generate $ 48 ,000 a year in tax
increment financing. Eight million dollars of additional
estimated market value will generate $384 ,000 a year.
The expansion of the K-Mart Tax Increment District 1 to
include the commercial property made good land use planning and
financial planning sense then, now, and for the future years.
In 1983 , the City Council approved a policy of attracting
the one racetrack in the seven county area to the City of
Shakopee. Scottland Inc. and its partner North American Life
and Casualty Co. studied the immense downside risk of such a new
and untested venture and the positive effect a successful
racetrack might have on the remaining property it owned in the
Park, especially the commercially zoned property at the
intersection, and the positive effect it would have on the
entire City. Because of the potential for such positive effect,
Scottland Inc. and North American Life and Casualty Co. and its
partners invested over $65 million in the racetrack.
The City analyzed the tax increment to be generated by the
racetrack and potential spin-off development within the K-Mart
Tax Increment District 1 and decided to support the racetrack
project with the needed tax increment funds to make the project
possible. The City created the additional Racetrack Tax
Increment District which has a life of 1987-1994. Again, all
tax revenues generated therefrom may be used by the City for
approved public uses. The outlots within the plat are included
in that District (see enclosed map) .
In fact, as part of the racetrack ' s development agreement
with the City, we provided for the division of this property to
be platted from the racetrack and to the north so that it could
be developed separate from the Racetrack.
3. Post-Track Approval Studies
After the racetrack license was awarded on March 28 , 1984 ,
we immediately undertook an extensive study of the commercial
zoned property. We met on numerous occasions with City staff,
planning consultants and hotel consultants, etc. Based upon
those meetings, we developed and presented to the City staff,
Planning Commission and Council in July and August, 1985 , a
concept plan for the development of the intersection.
4 . Hotel Planning
Laventhol & Horwath, a national accounting firm
specializing in hotel site selection, studied various potential
hotel sites in the area, and confirmed our belief that a hotel,
as we are proposing, would succeed at the location proposed,
adjacent to the future Bypass.
We then had our architects and engineers finalize the
concept plans and presented them to the City staff, Planning
Commission and Council ( see enclosed) . Included therein are the
concepts of the potential development of a future Residence Inn
type lodging, a convention center and retail center. We believe
that one or more of these uses are at least 2 to 5 years away.
If the market will support them, the timetable could be
modified.
We again met with City staff to review our request for a
building permit for the hotel, which is a permitted use, and
they asked us to plat the property which we have done (although
we believed it was exempted from platting under State Statute) .
Although the State Highway Department has no jurisdiction
over the curb cut onto County Road 83, we met with the State
Highway Engineer who asked us to build the access road at least
300 feet north of the northerly entrance ramp onto the Bypass.
We agreed to do so and in fact our road is 390 feet north of the
future ramp. We have met with the County Highway Engineer who
has stated that the County will issue the curb cut after plat
approval by the City.
Scottland' s consulting engineer has developed the grading,
sewer and water plans and reviewed them with City staff which
has approved the plans, subject to final plans and
specifications. He met with Shakopee Public Utilities
Commission which asked that the water be looped, which we shall
do.
The Planning Commission approved the preliminary and final
plat at its meeting on November 19 , 1985 .
Conclusion
Scottland and the City have planned for the commercial
development of this property as early as 1973 • The City and
Scottland have made substantial investments in the area in hopes
that additional development would take place in the tax
increment financing districts. At this time we propose to
develop a $8 ,000 ,000 hotel to compliment and service the patrons
who attend the racetrack and other entertainment facilities in
the area.
We respectfully ask for your approval.
4Ih AVE. ```�`.�•-
US)nl AL °OULEV�rtl
nN
1
1" = 8001
o e
--- 1 10 4 1
°
a -
-'e < x q VALLEY
r INp
, � °pULEVARO
1a • z SOUIN
? f
17 3 4 1
' 1
Lzrr
1
U
N
\ BL•� , 1
1 _
? 3
--^ -- --I
pUTO1 E .�a -° 'p ' \ � OLP cgcfk K MART TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT
T PANK 2 SOUL 1
� NUMBER 1
2 7; 5
1 1
OUTLOT O
OUTLOT F OUTLOT O
T.1. 2
r
i
AVE
� Il
800'
i
1 �
' to
P
tl
/? r
17 y
c"cal-rev Ac Ic
►F, m
a
, a �
t .
ST�fIC3�c-S
0&
Lo c
C JT
1
' 4)
CjCr7'[.o -
4 4
PARO
i
_ 1 I
yA
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT
. I
NUMBER 4
6r�
OR W
Aw
•�' �:��f cam. AMOA
SM: �. -♦♦ a �'�;;:�� � t...«�c
XMid
RVI;
����_ ,��' ���; nus s'- �• ,_ -
7W loss
IM
MGM! Rej flow 111A
WWI
VIM ON
:r ,__. i�' II,,!`�1�_ur/N1111�N�R'1Rr =�\s,:*
_�_ ,,!1 I •+��.eR ► - 91 laws v<G,
iZ
�_ •�;(�i �y \ x:fe
11
If i
i*i?ii; �i•�� 1 '��� .;. ��� � _.`fit/��_;,.
'S Ll�lkl kip\� ..'� ?��/� ❑_ �-.��.� a�.� � `/•ate
Vis. �-__ ��'tr.�_�:.–=-= £� !\1�9=
��if�—�. �.�_��h _1-i: -- a`J ,�• \ '••�� �. ' ter'► ���
Ilk
;�ll�� �, , ��:�—�— :_Egli • r=!---•��.► ��\ .� a1 �'�•.
'��R'!•: �S �� �\ Vii•
ice.. ger � '• �: � i
,1 !
HIM
�r
o•
•-3 ��- •��'iiv
x
0
a
o. .
rn
Z z
g L=l L=� 3_
A
m
AF
m
D
m
K
A 1
� A
q30
O y
z
n D
T � �
i
/ O
O
n �
N O
O
n
r
I
o T�
1
ll11 N
_ 1
A
7
Traffic Report of Benshoof and
Associates Inc . which concludes
that the proposed access road is
appropriately located is enclosed.
BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC.
TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE CONSULTANTS
7901 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE,SUITE 1191 EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 553441(612)944-7590
November 7, 1985 85-34-62
REFER TO FELE:
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Tim Keane, Scottland, Inc.
FROM: James A. Benshoofc�\Pj
RE : Access for Canterbury Business Park
As requested by Bill Engelhardt, we have reviewed the basic
access needs for the Canterbury Business Park. As we under-
stand, the Canterbury Business Park is planned to be a
multi -use office, hotel , and commercial development, which
would occur on about 65 acres of property located immediate-
ly south of Canterbury Downs and west of County Road 83 .
The particular question that we have addressed Is : Should
access for the Canterbury Business Park be provided via a
new, direct access point on County Road 83 or should access
be provided via the existing access point serving Canterbury
Downs ( intersection of County Road 83 and 12th Avenue) ?
Given the types of proposed land uses and the significant
scale of development, it is highly important that the
access/egress needs of the development be effectively
accommodated. Objectives that should be accomplished
relating to the access solution include:
Provide an access solution that is effectively ident-
ified with the development to minimize the potential
for confusion among motorists traveling to and from the
site.
Provide adequate capacity and safety for ingress and
egress movements .
Minimize potential conflicts between development traf-
fic and other traffic on County Road 83 and on 12th
Avenue.
Effectively relate the traffic needs of the proposed
development with those of Canterbury Downs .
Tim Keane -2- November 7, 1985
In completing this review, we have related the access needs
for the Canterbury Business Park to actual traffic condi-
tions experienced at the Canterbury Downs access point loca-
ed at County Road 83 and 12th Avenue. Specifically, I ob-
served Canterbury Downs traffic exiting at this location
during the period immediately after the last racing event on
October 15, 1985. At that time, the Canterbury Downs road-
way functioned in a one-way outbound manner and was serving
a high volume of exiting traffic. No traffic was allowed to
use this roadway to enter the Canterbury Downs site at that
time.
Another related experience that we have had pertains to
traffic studies that we have performed for the Met Center in
the City of Bloomington. We serve as on-going traffic en-
gineering consultants for the Northstar Financial Corpora-
tion, which owns the North Stars Hockey Club and leases the
Met Center, and have performed several traffic studies for
that site during the last three years. Two points we have
learned from this experience, which pertain to the Canter-
bury Downs and Business Park situation, are that : 1 ) the
traffic needs for major special events are quite different
from those of other land uses and 2) the traffic needs for
both special events and other nearby land uses need to be
carefully considered to provide reasonable access and egress
solutions for all involved land uses.
Considering the types and intensity of development in the
Canterbury Business Park and considering our related ex-
periences with Canterbury Downs and Met Center traffic, we
have concluded that the Canterbury Business Park should have
a separate means of access via County Road 83 . In our ,judg—
ment this access solution is necessary in order to provide
reasonable access for the proposed development and to min-
imize conflicts with Canterbury Downs traffic.
The alternative concept of serving the Canterbury Business
Park via the existing Canterbury Downs driveway would in-
volve several significant difficulties , including:
Conversion of the eastern portion of the driveway into
a public street and then realigning it into the Canter-
bury Business Park site. The Canterbury Downs driveway
then would come to a T intersection with this new, re-
aligned roadway. The end result would be reduced con-
venience and increased delay for Canterbury Downs
customers.
Substantially increased conflicts between Canterbury
Downs and Canterbury Business Park users. During the
periods before and after Canterbury Downs' events,
access and egress for the Canterbury Business Park
would
/}be/Jmore difficult.-67
�(
c� L
s r�
1
The City Staff requested that we
show how the remainder of the
property could be subdivided in
the future . One such way is
shown on the enclosed plan.
is •
.r.
- � 400.02 ^•
I1XCEYT/ON No --
I'1 .409/E"E—
al.o'I 400.02
it � • �
N
O
G
r
m
ill ' k
U m I IIII \ .I I n I III Z o
o
?; Is I.!•U'll \�,\` I I I I� Y Irl t]
• •7 I I� aI
a I�I
��• I li `I I;, ;gip.,
n, II!� hi 1lIlI� Mo
b 111 I .I I
if
4ly II•I 'I. •7/J I11I ••. .
N N P93 1 60 j64
.....__..._
_ c � I � ur I;I � •i
II •;,
_•, .I I , e I � I I I
I L
11 299 $
fi I I J„1I
1 c N
m v o
�n�SnTATE OF
V
U�J Ll IEZ(OlrQ
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
PHONE NO. 492-6400 19825 Park Boulevard, Jordan, MN 55352 FILE NO. v
November 15, 1985
Mayor Eldon Reinke
2569 Hauet Tr.
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Mayor Reinke:
You are cordially invited to the November 26, 1985 grand opening of
the Chaska to Shakopee section of the Minnesota Valley Trail.
The opening will begin at the Shakopee Community Services Building
(located just north of the Shakopee City Hall) at 2:00 p.m.
Following a brief ribbon cutting ceremony, we will have a driving tour
of the trail.
Sincerely,
6jv',-'C� jT
Chuck Kartak
Manager
Minnesota Valley Trail
THE MINNESOTA VALLEY TRAIL:
"A cooperative effort in recreation and natural
resource management by federal, state, and local
governments and private interests."
BW-49-48:lk
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
M 0 o W n
W G O r rt
r• N r' O t1)
r• G•7 m
G wi 9
Oo 0 d O
O rt
E I-i
a
d
3
^X rt
rt
ONo v O O w O \
N Do O O O
O o o 00 a n t
0 o c) d
G
r n
rQ 1--j Lo I--� n ' 3 ■,,,,,
O O W r•
O O O O, O
O O O O 9 n 9 y 1 m
O O y I
ro C7 G7
d ro ro
ti s
z /
m / I
m �0 < r I
I- 0
0ol
3 N n m
z
�?
1
,0,0 m 1 a
K
CO. RD NO 83
AP
4-P Np Y 1
/ryO Se�O �1■Y■■r
m �c
20 D��p [�o a n �w�■r
L• O (IO ^C Y
--4
m o n
< Fo
3R�E I
z VALLEY I(
y
m v00 �y CONNLIN CO.
m \� I
�m
I n
m
I 1 �
I ,
I I �
I � I
I
I I 0 p
I 1 �
o I m
I I m
� I o
I ,
UCb D
ro
m nv m
I I � �• n N -i �—
I
� a _
w
a -
o
a o
lines in the future year scenario. The problem, if it occurs, will be recti-
fied by the City of Shakopee through either the construction of a "minibypass"
at the intersection or by implementing night racing on Fridays.
As noted in the Council " March 22, 1984 comments, future roadway improvements
are expected to alleviate future congestion problems that result from racetrack
events. These improvements include the construction of the Shakopee Bypass and
Hennepin County Rd. 18, the widening of Scott County Rd„ 42 to four lanes and
reconstruction of Scott County Rd. 83.
SEWERS
Estimated racetrack flow to the sanitary sewer system is 0.204 mgd. Although
this figure is higher than the 0.15 indicated in the initial information
submission, it still would not have a substantial impact on the metropolitan
disposal system or system plan.
Both the draft and final EIS state that the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan allows
for average industrial flows of 2,000 gallons per acre per day. In order to
avoid a potential negative impact on the metropolitan disposal system, the
plan, in fact, proposes to manage industrial flows to riot exceed 1,000 gallons
per acre per day for net industrial acreage. However, assuming a flow of 0.204
mgd, the 390-acre racetrack site would produce a daily per acre flow of 523
gallons,. which is well within the 1,000 gallon cap.
c. k CL
The racetrack site is located in Shakopee"s Service Area 13, plus parts of
service Areas 3 and 4. Service Area 13 is in the Shakopee interceptor
expansion area. If the racetrack should require flow diversions as discussed
in the city's comprehensive plan, Shakopee should plan to construct any
facilities necessary to divert these flows. as local facilities using local
funds only.
The final EIS indicates that water used for hosing down horses would be dir-
ected to the sanitary sewer system. At a meeting on May 4, 1984, staff from
the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and thE! Council and racetrack
representatives agreed that flows from washdown water (up to 22,500 gallons per
day) would be directed to the sanitary sewer system because BOD loading is esti-
mated to be in the order of 200 milligrams per liter. This information will be
included in the comprehensive plan amendment to be submitted by the city.
OTHER METROPOLITAN GUIDE CHAPTER COMMENTS
METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK
As noted above, part of the racetrack site is located outside the city's 1985
urban service area as described in the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan. In order
for the racetrack to be fully consistent with the local plan, Shakopee is
preparing a comprehensive plan amendment revising its; 1985 urban service area
to include the total site. The city will submit the amendment within the
month.
HOTEL/MOTEL PROJECT SUMMARY - 3
PROJECT LOCATION SIZE
Appletree Motel Minnesota 50 Rooms
Conceptual Design
Cannon Falls Motel Cannon Falls, Minnesota 35 Rooms
Schematic Design
Dyckman Hotel Minneapolis, Minnesota 200 Rooms
Consultation
Nicollet Hotel Minneapolis, Minnesota 325 Rooms
Renovation Schematics
Gateway Hotel Minneapolis, Minnesota 16 Stories
Residential to Hotel
Conversion Feasibility
LaQuinta Burnsville, Minnesota 150 Rooms
Consultation
Granada Royale/Embassy Suites Bloomington, Minnesota 311 Units
Preliminary Design
KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC.
HOTEL)WTEL PROJECT SUMMARY - 2
PROJECT LOCATION SIZE
Lincoln Hotel Bloomington, Minnesota 300 Rooms
Schematic Design 350,000 s.f.
Office
Red Wing City Center Red Wing, Minnesota 125,000 s.f.
Renovation/Schematics Mixed-Use
Roadway Motel Minnesota 45 Units
Preliminary Design
CHoward Johnson Motel Bloomington, Minnesota 50 Rooms
A-qdition
(Carter Plaza Hotel St. Cloud, Minnesota 114 Rooms
(Renovation/Conversion
Harbor Hotel Ashland, Wisconsin 60 Rooms
Schematic Design Marina Related
Met Stadium Hotel Bloomington, Minnesota 300 Rooms
Concept Design
Minnesota Derby Hotel Shakopee, Minnesota 150 Rooms
Site Planning, Concept Design
Mountainside Winter Park, Colorado 488 Units
First Phase Completed Resort
Mt. Olivet Retreat Farmington, Minnesota 105 People
Completed 1978
Mayo Hotel /Ramp Rochester, Minnesota 300 Rooms
Preliminary Design
Thl underbird Hotel Bloomington, Minnesota 50 Rooms
Addition
Completed 1979
Hotel Virginia Virginia, Minnesota 85 Rooms
Conceptual Design
KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC.
HOTEL/MOTEL PROJECT SUMMARY - 1 f( "
PROJECT LOCATION SIZE
Francis Drake Hotel Minneapolis, Minnesota 125 Rooms
Renovation Design
�Sheraton Park Plaza �, St. Louis Park, Minnesota 302 Rooms
_____. — - 15 Stories
Curtis Hotel Minneapolis, Minnesota 500 Rooms
Schematic Design Executive Hotel
Condominiums
Retail
Leamington Hotel Minneapolis, Minnesota 550 Rooms
Renovation/Remodeling 35,000 s.f.
conv. space
(
' Holiday Inn Burnsville, Minnesota 150 Rooms
�ktlftfN�t��u vu4�� i�ir�l.
-- ---- - Restaurant
nR,
T'd"flKe�-J"C1lTdr'�-tnn ,
�'�'a'yan u'�Rr�itif2 i3w t ,g tirnw
Completed April 1984
Sheraton Motor Inn Eden Prairie, Minnesota 152 Rooms
Schematic Design 5 Story
Marriott Hotel St. Louis Park, Minnesota 300 Rooms
Schematic Design
Minnesota Hotel Minneapolis, Minnesota 1,000 Rooms
Schematic Design Convention Ctr.
Leamington Hotel Minneapolis, Minnesota 550 Rooms
Schematic Renovation
Northwest Hotel New Brighton, Minnesota 150 Rooms
Concept Design
Capitol Plaza Hotel St. Paul , Minnesota 150 Hometel
Schematic Design Rooms
400000 s.f.
Office
KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC.
�C °�-
Korsunsky, Krank & Erickson
Architect Inc . have had
substantial experience in
Hotel /Motel construction.
See enclosed summary.