Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06/11/1985
TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ .REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA JUNE 11 , 1985 Mayor Reinke presiding 11 Roll Call at 7 :00 P .M. 21 Convene as the Board of Equalization: a] Claire Nickolay Property - tabled 6/4/85, bring memo 3c6 b] Elmer Halversen Property K3 )q, 2 z , c] Marceline Hickman Property 1-' i � r1 d] Shakopee Progessioral Group Property Y� e] Valley Health Properties Property f] Steve Hentges Property g] Dean ' s Lake Properties - tabled 6/4/85 , memo on gable )1] Stephen Strehlow) ropWrty 3] Continue oar of quallzat2�bn to June 18 , 1985 at 7 :00 P.M. 41 Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 5] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 61 Communications : a] Brendan L. Suel re : Code Enforcement Officer for City of Shakopee b] 71 Public Hearings : None 81 Boards and Commissions: None 91 Reports from Staff: a] I .R.Bond Policy - Res. No . 2293 b] Request by Clete Link to appear to speak on IR Bonds for Bemidji Super 8 Partnership $1 , 800, 000 IR Bond Application and request for reconsideration of the June 4th Council action c] Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Projects - 6/4th 13a memo d] Shakopee Swimming Pool e] 1985 Set-Up Licenses - tabled 6/4 - 13h memo f] 1985 3. 2 Beer Licenses - tabled 6/4 - 13i memo g] 1985 Wine Licenses — tabled 6/4 - 13j memo h] 1985 Intoxicating Liquor Licenses - tabled 6/4 - 13k memo i] Unfunded Project Costs - 6/4th 13o memo j ] Storm Water Drainage Utility - 6/4th 13t memo k] Opening of Viking Steel Road - Update by City Attorney 11 Milwaukee Road Right-of-Way Along 4th Ave . , Market to Filmore - Update by City Attorney m] Milwaukee Road Right-of-Way Along 4th Ave . , Filmore to Spencer - Update by City Attorney n] Disorderly Conduct at Events Ordinance - 6/4th 13x memo o] LCM Constitutional Amendments and Dues Proposal p] Scott County Governmental Study Commission - 6/4th 14d memo q] Ord. No. 171 , Parking Restrictions in CBD - 6/4th 14e memo 101 Other Business : 11 ] Adjourn to Tuesda- , June 18, 1985 at 7 : 00 P .M. •Jr bn V Anriar�nn (':i t-v Argmi n c CIT Y 2-5 in 129 Fist Fust AvatuG Shakopee. Minnesota 55379 r,( M E M Q TO: 141n,,k na,, Board of RPvietnr FROM: Scott County Assessor's Office SUBJECT: Elmer Halversen Property DATE: June 11, 1985 Location.: 8455 Eagle Creek Blvd. PID Number: 27 913 062 0 I rechecked this home and other buildings along with hx. Halversen on June 6th and recommend the following adjustments be mades on house Depreciation be increased from 35% to 40' due to deterioration of the foundation which is poured concrete. New roof w!11 be needed within the next few years, windows very loose which reduces heating efficiencyq and plaster cracking inside of the home. The 1985 value should be reduced from $74700 to $73500 for the land and buildings. Original Value Recommended Value Land $24500 Land $24500 Bldgs. $50200 Bldgs. $49000 Total $74700 Total $73500 PARCEL NO. DWELLING year built -IK X sq. ft. story height !� no. roomsr no. baths M no. bedrooms i basement percent basement fin. fireplace walkout aT A deck central air brick trim �^ porch Lot Size Xc'-.: GARAGE X f attached yes no OBSERVED CONDITION: exc. — good fair poor (.RAUE bi GTY Ur' Mt� � r � r� 129 E= First Avenue Shakopx. Minnesota 5.5379U. MEMO Tp• 1985 Shaknupp Board of Ti .iT FROM: Scott County's-Assessor's Office SUBJECT. Marceline Hickman Property DATE: June 11, 1985 Location: .210 E. Shakopee Avenue PID Number: 27 002 033 0 & 27 002 036 0 Mrs. Hickman's property is described as Lots 14 — 17 and the west 5 feet of lots 15 and 21 Block 7 G & 0 Addition. The total lot size is 170' x 160' . The home is a Page & Hill structure which was built in 1947. The house is a 1 story home of 1821x sq. ft. The attached garage is 24' x 321 . There is a breeze— way of 240 sq. ft. Extras include a 3/4 bath in the basement and 1 fireplace. Central air condt,ioning had been assessed for this property due to an arbitrary assessment in 1980. I rechecked this property on June 7th and found there to be reason for increased - I depreciation to be applied to this structure t ie: Roof leaks by fireplace mantle in Living roomy Plaster cracked in portions of the house, radiators cannot be shut off in rooms which need not be heated in the wintery (bsmt.9 other extra roomsj� water leakage in basement from the outside walls. The 1954 value on this property was: Bldgs. $52900 63200 Total $116100 The 1955 value for this property is: Lasid $37600 (After recheck) Bldgs. $58400 Total $96000 Note: An error in the legal description for the property resulted in the higher lot value for the 1984 assessment. An abatement for taxes due this year will be processed to correct this mistake. 129 FAst Fini AyenueG Sh"opde. Ml nesota =49 441 MEMO TO: 1955 Shakopee, Bard of RE-vi" FROM: Scott County's Assessor's Office SiJHJECT. Marceline Hickman Property DAZE June 11, 1955 Location: 210 E. Shakopee Avenue PID Number: 27 002 033 0 & 27 002 036 0 Mrs. Hickman's property is described as Lots 14 — 17 and the west 5 feet of lots 18 and 21 Block 7 G & 0 Addition. The total lot size is 170' x 1601 . The home is a Page & Hill structure which was built in 1947. The house is a 1 story home of 1824 sq. ft. The attached garage is 24' x 321 . There is a breeze— way of 240 sq. ft. Extras include a 3/4 bath in the basement and 1 fireplace. Central air condtibning had been assessed for this property due to an arbitrary assessment in 1980. I rechecked this property on June 7th and found there to be reason for increased depreciation to be applied to this structure? ie: Roof leaks by fireplace mantle in Living room, Plaster cracked in portions of the houses radiators cannot be shut off in rooms which need not be heated in the wintery (bsmt., other extra rooms), water leakage in basement from the outside walls. The 1984 value on this property was: Land $52900 Bldgs. $63200 Total $116100 The 1985 Value for this property is: Land $37600 (After recheck) Bldgs. $55400 Total $96000 Note: An error in the legal description for the property resulted in the higher lot value for the 1984 ,sSess:cen�. An abatement for taxes due this year will be processed to t _s :Mistake. PARCEL NO. DWELLING year built -- - X sq. ft. story height no. rooms no. baths no. bedrooms basement percent basement fin. fireplace walkout deck central air brick trim porch Lot Size X CITY OF SJ::iAJh- Ur &jE 129 Eas= First Avenue; Shakopee. Minnesota 55379 MEMO TO 1985 Sh�k Roar of R-eview _ FROW Scott County Assessor's Office SUBJECT:Shakopee Professional Group Building DATE June 11, 1985 Location: 327 Marschall Road. PID Number: 27 068 004 0 This building is owned and operated by a group of business people of various occupations in the Shakopee area. It is an office building which was constructed in 1982 and is only partially completed as of this date. The lot is described as part of Lots 4 & 5 Block 1 Furrie's ist Addition. , The lot size is 1.85 acres or 84959 sq. ft. The building is a 3 story prestressed concrete structure of 7800 sq. ft. with a partial basement area of 704 sq. ft. complete, the 2nd The building is partially completed with the lst level 95�o com P level 100% completev and the 3rd level 92% complete. The overall completion percentage used for the building is 95%• The value for the 1984 assessment was: Land $148700 ($1.75/sq• ft.) _ I Bldg.$629800 Total$778500 The 1985 value for the building is: Land $148700 Bldg.$629800 _ Total$778500 The values used were agreed upon by A1 .Furrie and Leroy Arnoldi (Scott County Assessor's Office) on 7/13/83 and have been used for the past two assessments. I A request for income information was sent to Mr. Furrie on 1/3/85. We have not received a reply for this information as of 6/6/85• V rf ig Co PARCEL NO. U� DWELLING year built J9('iT— $,,3 3 NH K X sq. ft. �t�3? story height no. rooms no. baths no. bedrooms basement percent C�� basement fin. fireplace walkout deck central air brick trim porch Lot Size X GARAGE X attached yes no i OBSERVED CONDITION: CITY OF 6 iiAlS. Urk!jh; ""*� 129 E= Fiat Arronue; Shakopee. Minnesota 55379 7 MEMO TO: 1985 ShgknDPP Rnalli nf_ Ray;ata Fp pM Scott County Assessor's Office SUBJ .LT. Valley Health Properties DATE: June 11, 1985 Location:287 Marschall Road PID Number: 27 Obs 003 0 This property is described as part of Lots 3 & 4 Block 1, Furrie's lst Addition. The lot is 2.88 Acres of commercially zoned land. The building which was constructed in 1982, is an office building which serves doctors of various specialties in the Shakopee area. The building is a 2 story structure with no basement. The total square footage t of the ground floor is 7142 sq. ft. i The property is appraised as being 1001 complete for the lst level and 30% com- plete for the 2nd story. The 1984 valuation, which was agreed upon by Mr. Al Furrie and Leroy Arnoldi (Scott County Assessor's Office)' was: _ Land $107100 Bldg. $328800 f Total $435900 t The 1985 value for this property is: Land $107100 Bldg. $328800 Total $435900 A request for income information on this building was sent to Mr. Furrie on January 39 1985• We have not received a reply to this request as of 6/5/85• i PARCEL NO. LQ DWELLING year built 9 F X sq. ft. i story height i no. rooms no. baths no. bedrooms basement percent basement fin. fireplace walkout deck i central air � brick trim porch I I Lot Size X GARAGE X attached yes no OBSERVED CONDITION: exc- — CITY 129 Eut First Avenue Shakopee. Minnesota 58379 MEMO TO: 1985 Sh kopee Ronrd of Rasr�Pw FROM: Scott County Assessor's Office SUBJECT: Steve Hentp-,es Property DATE* June 11, 1985 Location: 2461 Hauer Trail PID Number: 27 908 042 0 Mr. Hentges home was built in 1961 and has a square footage of 1649. The attached garage is 21 x 22 with an addtion put on the garage in 1980 with a size of 12 x 30. The home is 1 story with 47 12 baths, 2 fireplaces, central—air, brick trim, a deck which is 16 x 169 and a 7 x 23 concrete slab adjacent to the garage addition, The home is graded a 62 (slightly above average) . The lot is .70 acres. The 1984 value for this property was: Land $16100 Bldg. $63600 Total $79700 The 1985 value for this property is: • Land $16100 _ Bldg. $74900 Total $91000 The reasons for the increase in value were errors in the number of square feet, which resulted in an increase of 82 square feet. Omissions of central—air, A 246 sq. ft. deck, and the increase in square footage rates which are now used. ©WELLING, roar built PARCEL NO X it Oofv h@ight -- R®:no has@m@Rt fIR: - --- fIP@pla€e _ ----- Walhflut 04 €@Rtral hPi€k trim -- -- parch — -- — — _ Lot SSir@ — X--- ------- GARAGE ,-.y. atta€h@d v@5 RQ { OBSERVED GON®ITIOW @l+€, - -- good -- fair poor 129 FA= First Avenue; Sh"opee. Minnesota W379 r W MEMO . TO: 1955 Sh. , o Rnard Of P.PviRw FROM: Scott County Assessor's Office SUBJECT: Dean's Lake Property Owners DATA June 11, 1955 Listed below are the property Owners who have property located adjacent to Dean's Lake. Adjustments in the value will be made when a determination of "usable Land" can be made. To do this a contour map' of this area will be needed to do the cal— culations of land area. The Natural Ordinary High Water Mark has been established by the DNR to be 745.6 feet. The measurements will be related to this mark. The property owners and parcels involYed are: 1. Dave Czaja 27 915 030 1 2. Dan Dylla 27 055 002 0 3. James Lally 27 915 030 2 4. David Bates27 915 033 1 5. Walter Heinzeri 27 915 031 0 6. Charles Griffin 27 915 032 0 7. James Pietrzik 27 915 013 0 5. Roger Thompson 27 915 019 0 9.- Gordon Granne's 27 915 005 0 .10. Craig Hotzler 27 915 016 0 11. Edward Effertz 27 915 007 0 12. Todd Becken 27 915 011 0 13, Susan Stang 27 915 015 0 14. Gary Sorenson 27 915 010 0 6j 04'r CITY OF SkiAIS Ur4 .k� 129 Fist First Avenue, Shakopee. Minnesota 55379 7 MEMO TO: 1955 Shakopee Board of Review FgpNt Scott County Assessor's Office Ng EC-r. Stephen Strehlow Property DATM- June 41 1955 Location: 3059 Hauer Trail PID Number: 27 905 055 0 Mr. Strehlow home is a 1 story home of 2235 sq. ft. built in 1966. The house has 2 kitchens, 12 baths, a walkout, central—air, some brick trim, an open porch area, a 14 x 14 patio, and a 15 x 36 in—ground pool. The home is classified as above average (62) . The garage is attached and measures 26 x 22. The increase in valuation for 1955 was due to the rate increase and the regrading of this property from an average grade home to an above average grade home. The lot is .60 acres. The 1954 value was: Land $16100 Bldgs. $104400 Total $120500 ' The 1955 value-is: Land $16100 Bldgs. $109900 Total $126000 �,•EF-F_t) STSEHLo ., PARCEL NO. DWELLING year built ' ,,;y SKH K X sq. h• ^� Y story height ' no. rooms no. baths - ?.4 no. bedrooms basement percent r. basement fin. fireplace ✓ t walkout r, deck central air brick trim 1l porch Lot Size X GARAGE. X ' attached yes ✓ no I OBSERVED CONDITION: I exc. good fair poor I GRADE j CITY OF SHA &LU el� E 129 Fest First Avenue; Shakopee. Minnesota 55379 MEMO TO 1985 Shakopee Board of Review FROM: Scott County, Assessor's Office SUBJECT. Collins. Engfer. Vohnoutka Properties DATE: June 119 1985 Location: .Colling - 952 Sibley, Engfer - 960 Sibley, Vohnoutka - 1431 E. 10th. PID Numbers: Coiling - 27 027.001 0, Engfer -. 27 027 002 0, Vohnoutka - 27.027 003 0 I was directed to suggest an adjustment in the values for the home-owners listed above due to the effect of two 4-Plexes and their garages and their close proxi- mity to the single-family homes owned by these individuals. I have been unable to discover any sales which would show a decreased selling price due to this type -of situation in Shakopee. Logically, I would assume that there is indeed an adverse influence present. I therefore suggest that ` an adjustment of 5% in the 1985 market value be applied pending additional in- formation which may become available at a later date. The adjustments would be calculated as follows: Jerome Coiling Original 1985 Value Adjusted 1985 Value. 27 027 001 0 $741200 7095 Fred Engfer 27 027 002 0 $73,000 $697400 Francis Vohnoutka 27 027 003 0 $108,400 $103,000 ,�,��'""'•:a CITY U r` b = -At -nu zriru 129 Flit First AveuuC, Shakopee. Minnesota S3379 Ari E Ari Q. Tp. 1985 Shgk e Rnard of Review FROM: Scott County Assessor's Office SUBJECT: Cavanaugh-McNearney Funeral Home DATA June 11. 1985 Location: 333 S. Lewis PID Nu gr: 27 001 360 0 & 27 001 360 1 I was asked to find comparable sales of residential properties to defend my market value on this parcel. The available sales that would represent similar properties are almost nonexistent. The size of this structure eliminates most single-family structures and other larger homes that have sold, do not have a commercial bush ness being conducted from the structure. I do have the assessor's values for other funeral homes in Scott County and these are. listed below: Strait & Ballard Funeral Home in Jordan 1 & 2 story structure with 27814on the 1st level and 1468 sq. ft. on.the 2nd level. 1. Built in 1900. 60'x 1-40' lot 1985 EMV $$90,200 Fenske Funeral Home in Belle Plaine 1 story structure-7t-h3240 sq. ft. 2. Built in 1960 150' x 112' + 50' x 100' lot ` 198 $75_ Strait & Ballard Funeral Home in Prior Lake 1 & 2 story structure with 3170 sq. ft. on lst level and 390 sq. ft. on the 2nd level. 3. Built in 1900 remodeled in 1935 85' x 150' lot 1985 EMV $1209200 4. Philipp Is Funeral Home in Shakopee .1 story structure built in 1960 with 2592 sq. ft. 60'x 142' lot 1985 EI�iy $829800 800 Cavanaugh-i�:cNearney Funeral Home 1 & 2 story structure with 2161 sq. ft. on the lst level and 1325 sq. ft. on the 2nd level. Built in 1910 with an addition in 1949. Remodeled over the years with no date given for this remodeling. 71' x 120' lot 1985 ETV . 94,400 Note: Terence Klinger Property (Old St. Lary's Convent) sold in 11ay, 1983 for ,76,000. This home was built in 1912 and has 1457 sq. ft. on the lst level and 917 on the 2nd level. At time of purchase a new heating system was needed and some of the rooms had no ceiling. Each of the 5 bedrooms in the structure had a wash basin. Extensive remodeling would be needed to bring this home to a functionally efficient structure for a single family or for rental pur- poses. Lot is 60' x 1421 , 1985 EMV 14')781500 CITY OF Sk3AIILUrl� E . /4„ 129 Esst First Avwue� Shakopee. Mi=mta 55379 {t MEMO .o: 1985 Shakopee Bgard of R view Sco FROM: tt Count Assessor's Office M;nn� Racetrack Inc SUBJECT. • DATE �� Tnc 11, 1985 2 Location: Sections 41 5, 8, & 9 Township 115 Range 2 p9 pl3 09 & 27 909 014 0 PID Numbers: 27 904 013 O, 27 905 001.0+ 27 908 071 01 27 9 to the parcels noted above, have not been valued as of this date. The improvements or State Boards of eons to appear at the County In order to retain their opt' property be Equalization, it was requested that the Minnesota Racetrack, Inc. ualization meeting noted noted in the minutes of The Shakopee Board of Eq rior to the July 8th meeting The valuations for- this property should be concluded p Board of Equalization. of The Scott County I I i �L JAMES H. RUSSELL, P. A. ATTORNEY AT LAW 135 VALLEY SQUARE OFFICE CENTER 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55427 BRUCE E.RUSSELL TELEPHONE R.JEFFREY MCLEOO (612)545-5653 LEE W.MOS ER June 4, 1985 OF COUNSEL Scott County Assessor Courthouse 112 Shakopee , MN 55377-1381 Attn: Bob Schmitt Re : Howe, Inc. Parcel #27-105001-0 Dear Mr . Schmitt: I wish to appear before the Board of Review relative to the 1985 assessment to discuss the following items that I believe are exempt from ad valorem taxation: 1. Retaining wall on dike safeguarding large tanks. _ ,p 1,630 2. "L" shaped cement slab and curb safeguarding tanks. O92y-o 3. Loading spout structure and canopy. J'0 15$ Very truly yours , James H. Russell JHR/ps 2775 cc: Howe, Inc. 1985 ASSESSMENT PARCE, NEER: 27 105 OUT C OWNER: Howe Inc. STRUCTURES DIMENSIONS SQ. FT. DEPR. & OBS. NET RATE EMV 15o x 200 — 80 28520 9.30 265236 x 80 20.05 29674 IgAl Off x 2 6 60 11.60 78416 x 6 12.45 7171 Mix 600 12.05 7230 „ EXEMPT 0 e 6 0 18700 ea 37400 33165 60% 13266 13266 8500 60� 3400 3400 .181--3 g 1x116 9744 12.00 116928 tks 0 x 60 00 3.85 9240 2.10 6630 1 or Part of Retaing Wall 20 L.F 20.00 104 x 10 20 70% Com 1. 8.40 91728 2 12.05 X3158 10 Y 689 8'77 P- 2189833 § 272.03 'ION, GENERAL PROVISIONS TAXATION, GE�iERAI. PROVISIONS Note 66 property Pe y necessary ro rt authorized taxpayer to elect to have ownershipor use of ro rt which are reasonablynecessa to verifythat the p Pe Y exempted. Hennepin County v qualifies for exemption. Inc., 1973, 297 Minn. 112, 210 Subd. 3. Any taxpayer who has filed the statement required by subdivision 1 more Which are leased under agreement than 12 months prior to February 1, 1983,or February 1 of each third year year after ti 3, shall osession is lost and owner can no filestatementopbroperty subject to ebruary 1, 1983, he requirements of this section I of each shat be exempt from them to anyone else without consent not held for lease or for sale so as to taxation under section 272.02 if the taxpayer claiming the exemption knowingly violates _inventory" io ates inventory" for purposes of personal any of the provisions of this section. Added by Laws 1975, a 352, § 2; Laws 1981, 1st Sp., c. 1, artS, § 4, eff. July 1, 1981. 1,law. Id. `9ost concept in the word "inventory" +in the personal property tax exemp• laws 1975, c. 352, § 3, provides: "This act exemption, the requirements of this section shall j; an availability for sale in ordinary shall be effective for property taxes assessed m not apply to property covered by the statement of 1976 and thereafter and due and payable in 1977 exemption unless the property was listed and as ills, - t is, 1969,285 Minn. 146, 1711V.City N.W.2dand thereafter.". Olson Equipment Co. sessed as taxable property in the preceding Year-- 1 _ 1981 Amendment. Revised subd. 3 which pre- Library References Wes power to sell leased construction viously provided: Taxation -251. 9people other than a lessee was limit- "During each of the throe years following the g that lessee was entitled to retain the year in which a taxpayer files a statement of C.J.S. Taxation §§ 304, 305. a long as he paid rent, leased con- pipment in the possession of a lessee 272.03. Definitions ,entory" within personal property tax For the purposes of taxation, "real property" iatute, even though the lessor was at Subdivision 1. (a) Real property. P rpo cling to sell a leased item either to includes the land itself and all buildings,structures,and improvements or other fixtures on xhers. Id. it, and all rights and privileges belonging or appertaining to it, and all mines, minerals, ho towers quarries, fossils, and trees on or under it. together with all `ms which had been created by non (b) A building or structure shall include the building or structure itself, '1L to perform certain services solely improvementsA builds or fixtures annexed to the building or structure, which are integrated with ds and which were found to havedless of Frly subjected to prope present use of the � of theinr building,of andnent whichhnefit to the building or structure,cannot be removed without substantial damageeto itself or to the l to interest on the re statutory rate of six percent per building or structure. est would be allowed from the date (c) (i) The term real property shall not include tools, implements, machinery, and petitioned commissioner of taxa- equipment attached to or installed in real property for use in the business or production Vtion or from the date of payment of activity conducted thereon, regardless of size, weight or method of attachment. axes,whichever was later. Commu- !Unen Services, Inc. v.Commission- (ii) The exclusion provided in clause (c)(i) shall not apply to machinery and equipment achinery n 1976, 309 Minn. 447, 245 N.W.2d includable du gable as isrealused tnbhe businesy clauses s or productionactivityactivity conducted ois section even n the reah such l property ':ower which supported a television if and to the extent such business or production activity consists of furnishing services . raansmitting television signals was products to other buildings or structures which are subject to taxation under this chapter. ;property taxation under exemption (See main volume for text of subds. 2 to 61 7 used in business or production tpayer. KDAL. "Town"or"district" means town,city,or ward; as the case 1308 Minn. 101, 240 N.W.2d 560. may be. - [See main volume for text of subds. 8 to I11 Subd. 12. Repealed by Laws 1971, c. 427, § 26• 7; Laws 1973,c.650, zxpayer claiming an exemption Amended by Laws 1971, Ex.Sess.,c.31, art. 17,§ 1; Laws 1973,c 123,art 5, § tbdivision 1, clauses (1) to (7), art. 24, § 2; Laws 1974, c. 545, § 2• 31, limits and net debt limits based on the assessment N used for educational purposes 1971 Amendment Laws 1971, Ex.Sess., c ?ng and property owned by the art 17,§ 1,added clause(b)to subd. 1,relating to of property made in 19L and thereafter." 1 file a statement of exemption inclusions within the terms buildings or structures. 1973 Amettdtrients Laws 1973' c. 123' art' S. iroperty is located on or before Laws 1971, Ex.Sess., chapter 31, was the 1971 § 7,was a general authorization for the consolida- �xemption. In case of sickness, "tax law", approved by the governor upon Octo- tion of the terms "villages and "boroughs" into cause exists, the assessor may ber 30, 197E Article 38 of that law stated: "Ex- the term "cities" or the substitution of the term :period not to exceed 60 days. cept as otherwise" provided for in the provisions "statutory cities for "villages" and/or "bor- d contents of the statement s. of this act, this act is in effect from and after its oughs." 1973,c. 650,art. 24, § 2.added clause (c) final enactment. Laws Laws 1971,c.427, § 28,provides: in 1972ct to to and f os tithe 1 which reap uropertyud See, also. items 193 .axpayer filing a se statement of be effective for the taxes assessed Z and records relating to the payable in 1973 and thereafter and for tax rate 85 historical note under section 272.02 .�...-<.,�-•�.-F-�'... ---�..�-.•err^--, r (612) 445-2881 BRENDAN L. SUEL 11825 Marystown Road Shakopee, MN. 55379 June 3, 1985 In re: Code Enforcement Officer City of Shakopee Personnel Department, and The Common Council of City of Shakopee City Hall Shakopee, MN. 55379 Gentlemen/Ladies: In the event the honorable council fails to choose a person possess- ing the knowledge, experience and working operations of the state statutes and/or Ordinances of the City of Shakopee relative to code violations please be advised that I would be interested in submitting a formal application subject to a more realistic hourly rate. Application would include qualifications and past experience which should meet and/or exceed requirements for subject position beginning with initial citations, proper processing and subsequent appearances before the Courts in the event testimony would be required. JSc y, ki BRENDAN L. SUEL 00 V TO: John K. Anderson , City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director RE: Industrial and Commercial Development Financing Policy DATE : June 7 , 1985 Introduction : Enclosed is the new policy on Industrial and Commercial Development Financing Policy which was reviewed in similar form at the City Council ' s April 16 , 1985 , meeting. If Council determines it is in order, the policy, ect. can be adopted as part of Resolution 2393 . Background The policy as attached is based upon the City of Bloomington policy and has the additional requirement of 15% owner equity as requested by Council . Some revisions have been made to the previous draft sent to the City Council to adopt the policy to the procedures used in Shakopee and clarify some of the language . In addition the application form used in the past has been modified to collect the additional information called for in the new policy. Mr. Krass is reviewing the policy in general, and specif- ically items. IIId and IVa which provide for the City to rescind earlier approvals to assure that this is legal. A copy of the new application is enclosed for Council infor- mation , but is not part of the resolution , in order that adminis- trative flexibility in revising the application can be maintained without the need for Council review and approval . Also , reference to fees has been transferred to the City ' s fee schedule so that the Council can review fees annually without the need to revise this policy. Recommended Action: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2393 Reauested Action : 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2393 Resolution No. 2393 A Resolution Adopting a Policy, Criteria and Procedures for the Review of Municipal Industrial and Commercial Development Financing ,Applications WHEREAS the City of Shakopee has utilized a set "Policy , Criteria and Procedures for the Review of Municipal Industrial and Commercial Development Bond Applications" as adopted by the City Council on November 8 , 1978 , and amended from time to time thereafter ; and WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Shakopee now desires to revise said policy to a significant degree such that it will resind the previously approved policy , criteria and procedures and hereby adopt new policy criteria and procedures ; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TnE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, Scott County Minnesota that : 1) The Policy , Criteria and Procedures for the Review of Municipal Industrial and Commercial Development Bond Applications as adopted November 8 , 191b and amended thereafter will not be used hereafter ; 2) The attached "Policy , Criteria and Procedures for the Review of Municipal industrial and Commercial Development Financing Applications is hereby adopted and made a part hereof. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee , Scott County , Minnesota , held this day of , 1985 . ATTEST : Mayor City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1985" City Attorney City of Shakopee, Minnesota POLICY, CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCING APPLICATIONS SECTION I : General The City of Shakopee is granted the power to issue revenue bonds and mortgages under Chapter 474 , Minnesota Statutes ( the "Act") . The Shakopee City Council , being aware that such financing may prevent the emergence of blighted land , excessive unemployment and the need for redevelopment financing from the State and Federal governments, has expressed its support for the use of such financing but has reserved the right to approve or reject projects on a case-by-case basis. The following criteria have , therefore, been developed for review of applications. SECTION II: Criteria a. The project is to be compatible with the overall develop- ment plans and objectives of the City and of the neighborhood in which the project is located. b. New buinesses locating in Shakopee must show relatively substantial new employment and tax base being generated by the project . C. Locating in areas of the City that the City wishes to develop , redevelop , or which in any ways complements any development plans or policy of the City, will constitute a prime purpose under these guidelines. It is also the City ' s intent to assist in business expansions or relocations within the City where it can be shown that such would have a substantial , favorable impact on employment or tax base , or both. d. It is the City ' s intent to assist new or existing businesses in the acquisition of existing facilities , where such acquisition will maintain the stability of the tax base , or of employment, or both, and provided that not less than 15% of the project cost is to be used for rehabilitation of the existing facilities. e. The project must not put a burden on existing City services or utilities beyond that which can be reasonably and economically accommodated . f. The applicant (and/or lessee in the case of property to be leased) must have : 1) a good financial standing or show a substantial net worth , 2) an equity of at least 15% in the project, and 3) an acceptable earnings history or pro forma . Applicant shall file with the City , statement of total costs and project equity, certified to by an authorized officer or partner, or the individual applicant , said statement to be filed at time of requesting the Final Resolution . g. The method of the tax-exempt financing ( e .g. , a mortgage versus bonds ) will be a consideration , and is to be related to the nature and feasibility of the project and to the overall financial ability of the applicant. The City will not entertain applications proposing to use tax-exempt denominational ID bonds (whether for sale to a limited group of so-called sophisticated investors or to the general public) as opposed to a tax-exempt mortgage unless the bonds have an investment rating of A or better by a generally recognized rating agency. h. Applications for acquisition of or replacement of machinery and equipment will be discouraged unless in conjunction with a totally new business in Shakopee , a physical plant expansion of an existing business , or where it is shown that the equipment acquisition is essential to the continued operation of the business in Shakopee . Also , it is the City ' s intent to assist where possible in the acquisition of pollution control equipment for any new or existing business being required to meet mandated standards. i . A further permitted use under these guidelines are projects , whether profit or nonprofit , engaged in providing health care services , including hospitals, nursing homes, and related medical facilities, but only when the following findings can be made : ( 1) Number of new jobs and related payroll is relatively significant. ( 2) The project would provide a facility or service , or expansion thereof considered desirable or necessary form a community services standpoint. ( 3) The project application also meets requirements of paragraphs a , e , f and g of these guidelines. j . Financing cannot be provided for any project where 25% or more of the proceeds are to be used for the purchase of land. SECTION III : Procedures a . The applicant must not commence any part of the con- struction of the project until there has been preliminary approval by the Council of the application for financing. b. The applicant shall make an application for financing on forms available from the City of Shakopee . The completed application is to be returned to the City , accompanied by the appropriate fee , whereupon the application will be forwarded to the City Council . C. The applicant shall concurrently complete the State Department of Economic Development application for such financing and submit such completed form to the City , which will submit the form to appropriate state officials when City approval has been granted. d. The applicant shall submit a timetable for completion of the project as part of the application and any apparent major deviation from that timetable will automatically cause the appli- cation to be brought back to the City Council for review. This timetable must relate to the State timetable for entitlement and pool allocations. The financing must be completed within the calendar year for which application is made . e. The applicant is to select qualified financial consultants and/or underwriters , as well as legal counsel , to prepare all necessary documents and materials . The City may rely on the opinion of such experts and the application shall be accompanied by a financial analysis (pro froma income -statement , debt service coverage, mortgage terms , etc . ) by the underwriter as to the economic feasibility of the project and the underwriter' s ability to market the financing if an underwriter is associated with the project . Financial material submitted is to also include most recent fiscal year-end , financial statements , prepared 4 by a certified public accountant , of the applicant and/or of any major lessee tenant , if readily available. f. Further , in the case of the tax-exempt mortgage placements, the applicant will be required to furnish the City, before passage of the Final Resolution, a comfort letter (but not necessarily a letter of commitment ) from the lending institution , to the affect that said lending institution has reviewed the economic feasibility of the project, including the financial responsibility of the guarantors and find that, in their professional judgment, it is an economically viable project. g. The applicant shall furnish along with the application , a description of the project, plat plan, rendering of proposed building , etc . , and a brief description of the applicant company. Such of this data as necessary may be furnished to member of the City Council and to any board or Commission as Council directs for background information. h. The applicant shall be required to pay the 1% deposit as specified in the State Allocation Plan , when and if required in order to request or maintain an allocation subsequent to the August 1 or August 31 deadlines in the State Allocation Plan. (This deposit is refundable upon completion of financing. ) i. Eight copies of the fully completed application and supporting documentation and payment must be submitted one ( 1) week before City Council sets a public hearing. Applications held under provisions of Section V. "Priority" , will be sent to the City Council at the first meeting following the established priority cut-off date. j . Prior to the established public hearing City staff will review the application and prepare a report to the City Council with: 1. Findings regarding the satisfaction of policy, criteria , and the public purposes of the Act. 2 . Findings regarding City Code and other requirements with respect to zoning provisions , building plans, platting , streets and utility services. k. City Council may deny the project or request preparation of the appropriate resolution for preliminary approval for consider- ations at the next Council meeting following the public hearing. All code findings and requirements must be met prior to adoption of resolution for preliminary approval.. 1. Approval of the final resolution will be considered by the City Council after the required criteria for firm approval have been met. The City Attorney shall review and approve ail legal documentation as to form , including mortgage and trust indentures , prior to approval of the final resolution. SECTION IV : Administrative a. The City Council reserves the right to deny any application for financing at any stage of the proceedings prior to adopting the final resol-ution authorizing issuance of the industrial development financing. b. The City is to be reimbursed , and held harmless , for and from any out-of-pocket costs related to the actual or proposed issuance of the bonds . The processing fee will be due the City in accordance with the City Fee Schedule adopted annually by Group 1 - Those projects which are located in a redevelopment project area ; or , are of a manufacturing or research type of use . Group 2 - Those projects which are located in a zone where manufacturing is a permitted use . Group 3 - All other projects. b. Group 1 projects are considered to be of highest priority and applications of Group 1 projects will be submitted to the City Council for consideration as they are received . C. Groups 2 and 3 project applications received prior to April 30 , will be held and submitted to the City Council in May for consideration. d . Groups 2 and 3 project applications received May 1 through July 31 will be held and submitted to the City Council in August for consideration. e. All project applications received on or after August 1 will be submitted to the City Council for consideration as they are received. the City Council . C. All applications and supporting materials and documents shall remain the property of the City. Note that all such materials may be subject to disclosure and/or public review under applicable provisions of State law. d. The Staff shall , at least once each year , prepare a summary cumulative report from all project applications submitted for that year and cumulatively to that point in time, and such report shall include : ( 1) Total number of applications processed. ( 2) Total number and dollar volume of projects. ( 3) Amount of tax base provided. ( 4) Number of new jobs provided . ( 5) Amount of annual payroll. generated. ( 6) Default information, if any. SECTION V: Priority a. Provided that an application meets all requirements of Section 1 and 2 of these Policy guidelines , it will be assigned to a priority group as follows : CITY OF SHAKOPEE APPLICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL OR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCING Date : Applicants Name : Address: Phone• Location of Proposed Project (address and legal description) : Please answer fully all of the following questions. Requested documents may be attached : 1 . Note appropriate category related to Section V. Priority. Group 1 : redevelopment district manufacturing research Group 2 : zone where manufacturing is permitted use Group 3: all other 2 . Indicate specific proposed use of the facility. 3 . List of all other facilities owned or operated by the appli- cant . 4 . Indicate how many new people will be employed in Shakopee as a direct result of this proposed project and what is the estimated payroll? 5 . Indicate what is the project ' s estimated minimum and maximum size and/or capacity? 6 . Indicate the proposed date for start of construction and completion of construction. 7 . List the estimated cost of the facility classified by : a) Building construction. b) Furnishings or non-fixed equipment. c) Land acquisition. d ) Property development . e) Professional fees . 1) Architectural engineering . 2) Legal 3) Fiscal f) Other (detail) . g) Total h) Indicate amount and type of owner equity . 8 . Indicate the applicant ' s legal interest in the land. 9 . Provide a list of all persons or members of any corporation, partnership or other organizations which will have a legal and fiscal interest in the ownership and management of project , identification of that interest , and listing of credit and professional references for all interested parties ( if applicable ) . If a corporation , include a resume or owners if privately held , or at resume of major officers and the board of directors of publicly held corporations. 10 . If any of the project is to be leased to other parties, provide an identification of those parties and a snowing of commitment for that interest , if leasing information is available . 11. Provide the borrower ' s financial statements , prepared by a Certified Public Accountant, for the immediate past three years. 12 . If interim financing is required , submit showing of a commitment for such financing from a reputable lender , if available. 13 . Provide a statement as to the final financing vehicle to be used , such as bonds or mortgage revenue notes , and the identity of the credit for repayment of the bonds or notes. 14 . Submit statement as to whether the financing instruments will be sold to individuals , insurance companies , savings institutions or other. 15 . If considered appropriate by the City , a financing feasibility report may be required which will detail those pnysical service and financial factors which will indicate possible success or failure of the proposed'. facility. 16 . Submit the resume of the underwriters including a listing of five other comparable offerings which have been placed with that underwriter. 17 . Indicate method of payment of all public cost to be incurred in development of the property . 18 . Attach completed "Application for Plan Review" and related submission requirements. 19 . Attach timetable for completion of the project. (Type Name of Corporation, Partnership, or Individual) ( Signed by) (Type Name and Title) (Date) a City of Shakopee, Minnesota POLICY, CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCING APPLICATIONS SECTION I • Genera The City of Shakopee is granted the power to issue revenue bonds and mortgages under Chapter 474 , Minnesota Statutes ( the "Act") . The Shakopee City Council , being aware that such financing may prevent the emergence of blighted land , excessive unemployment and the need for redevelopment financing from the State and Federal governments, has expressed its support for the use of such financing but has reserved the right to approve or reject projects on a case-by-case basis. The criteria in Section II have been developed for administrative review of" applications. &A Irrespective of such criteria the City Council reserves the I ight to refuse the issuance of bonds for any reason whatsoever. SECTION-- I! : Criteria a . The project is to be compatible with the overall develop- ment plans and objectives of the City and of the neighborhood in which the project is located . b. New buinesses locating in Shakopee must show relatively substantial new employment and tax base being generated by the project. C. Locating in areas of the City that the City wishes to develop , redevelop , or which in any ways complements any development plans or policy of the City , will constitute a prime purpose under these guidelines. It is also the City ' s intent to assist in business expansions or relocations within the City s.cfion 9 o by a certified public accountant , of the applicant and/or of any major 'Lessee tenant , if readily available . f. Further , in the case of the tax-exempt mortgage placements , the applicant will be required to furnish the City , before passage of the Final Resolution , a comfort letter ( but not necessarily a letter of commitment ) from the lending institution , to the affect that said lending institution has reviewed the economic feasibility of the project , including the financial responsibility of the guarantors and find that , in their professional judgment, it is an economically viable project. g. The applicant shall furnish along with the application , a description of the project , plat plan , rendering of proposed building , etc . , and a brief description of the applicant company. Such of this data as necessary may be furnished to member of the City Council and to any board or Commission as Council directs for background information. h. The applicant shall be required to pay any deposits required by the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic �y Development to give or retain an allocation of bonding authority "G�'i oti► for the proposed project . The City will refund such deposit if and to the extent the deposit is refunded to the City by the Minnesota Department of Energy -and Economic Development . i . Eight copies of the fully completed application and supporting documentation and payment must be submitted one ( 1 ) week before City Council sets a public hearing . Applications held under provisions of Section V. "Priority" , will be sent to the City Council at the first meeting following the established June 7, 1985 Mr. John Anderson, City Manager City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Super 8 Motel County Roads 16 and 17 Dear Mr. Anderson: We appreciate your efforts to have our I .D.B. request reconsidered. To assit you, we would like to submit the following projection of estimated costs : Land $ 426, 920.00 Construction/Architectural $ 1 , 263, 300.00 Additional Fee/Expenses * $ 529, 000. 00 Total $ 2, 219, 220. 00 Requested I .D.B. $ 1 , 800, 000.00 Owner ' s Equity $ 419, 220. 00 Owner' s equity is approximately 19% of the total projected project expenses. We shall remain hopefull to a favorable vote and look forward to a successful Super 8 Motel that will be a significant addition to the hospitality of your city. Sincerely, Li 07n Leland Jonen For Super 8 Partnership * See attached sheet for breakdown of expenses. Additional Fees and Expenses Legal $ 30,000. 00 Financing Fees 50, 000. 00 Appraisal and Feasibility Study 20, 000. 00 Developers Fees 50 , 000. 00 Land Improvement and Signs 34,000. 00 Furnishings , Fixtures and Equipment 150, 000. 00 TV and Teletype Systems 55 , 000.00 Franchise Fee 15 , 000.00 Interim Interst Cost 65 , 000. 00 Organizational Startup Cost 15 , 000. 00 Contingency 25 , 000. 00 Working Capital 20, 000. 00 Total $529 , 000. 00 I C = TY OF' �HAKC�F'�E INCORPORATED 1870 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 129 E. At Avenue - Sh Apee, Yinnesota 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650 MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Adm i n i st a or FROM: H. R. Spurrier, City Eng i neer SUBJECT: Shakopee Swimming Pool " t DATE: June 69 1985 INTRODUCTION: Attached is a memorandum dated June 29, 19841 regarding recom- mended modifications to the swimming pool filter. With work being undertaken now, there is an opportunity to add this work by change order at significant savings. BACKGROUND: With the addition of a water slide to the swimming pool, it is now mare important to have the filter operate at design capacity. In the June 29, 1984 memorandum, I stated that the filter was perated incorrectly, and that the incorrect opera- tion resulted in wasting 2!3 of the electricity used. That estimate was based on performance curves of similar pumps. To visualize what occurs when additional head is added to a system, as by throttling_ a valve, I have attached an example that shows the effect of adding 10 psi to the pump head. The pump in the example is the pump that will be used to supply the water slide. If 10 psi were added to that pump, the pump would lose 1, 280 gallons per minute of capacity and efficiency would drop from 76 percent to 47 percent . it would then take two more of these pumps to produce the equivalent flow rate at the increased head. I use the example to show how sensitive centrifugal pumps are, and to show why centrifugal pumps should be operated as they are designed t•� be operated. The problem with the swimming pool filter pump can be corrected by adding a ch 1 on i nat on booster pump as shown, in the attached sketch. The booster pump is req u i red to connect the pno b l em because the chlorine demand has changed from the original design rate. The pool was originally designed with a chlorine demand of 50 pounds per day. Now the actual chlorine use is twice Swimming Pool j urie 6, 19B5 Page 2 that amount . The reasrDns for the increased demand are too numerous t._- detail here. It is imperative that the chlorinator booster, pump be installed in order to improve filter efficiency. Payoff or, the booster- pump oosterpump is 6 years, primarily because the system is only operated 68 days per year. Other advantages r-realized as a result of the booster pump installation would be that the circulating purnps life would be nearly doubled, potential damage to the water slide because filter inefficiency would be reduced, chlor- ine use would be reduced because of improved filter efficiency, and back wash requirements would be reduced which would have the effect of lowering the sewer use of the pool which in turn reduces the sewer system operating costs. 1 have attached a cost estimate for- the swimming poral chlori- nator repair. The estimated cost is $1, 524. 00. This repair- work epairwork is urgently needed and should be completed before the swimming pool and the water slide are put into operation. It is my recommendation that the City Engineer be authorized to make the modifications to the swimming pool chlorinator, utilizing the contractor installing the water slide. or- alter- nate contractor if better price is available, in order to make the modifications prior to operation of the swimming_ pool and water slide. ACTION REQUESTED: A motion to authorize the City Engineer to make repairs neces- sary for the proper operation of the swimming pool filter and swimming pool chlorinator, as outlined in the attached memoran- dum, for- a cast not to exceed $1, 15S4. 0 0. HRS/prep POOL cc : George Muenchow Jim Karkanen LeRoy Houser- 1-'ii~i i i`•ai':; i Lig_ L,ri�_.Lli:°' ::I:.d.;al i_;, k.i C i .�• r`,i r`J.rt clf'jfi i..lil I e c t.r i.c i Ci. 1"Il B;ceJ J an e0LA S, WE,I G].r,c ;' [}4; Sut;tot R 7. a 1 .4-20 , 00 Cont i ngencv l tii2i'v,i iiii 'i : !:"W t v v c''v S .. 24 h = G c+.'w - -i'_!r �-I•'t Y,UJ t'I - �.{-i _!�'•�i•� I'..L�t"1 ., :��i.. ., 1 ..::��Si..i�:�I"'•.l+v r'i —' =i'.���:`'_�„ I ��el" �'Ec".l r-' Present Worth deorE'cJ &4-inCi over G' --ear.E at LL .. a. . 1'JL! 'e'c:iLte 4J,�.�� Ci`:eI, to dvUb1 iCt .. 1 E.' C;i' 1-E'C:.1".CLi I cti_7.r';g {.;L:fiiC'E. +ctJ. Le IN,E %leri Goer,4- Z'I. t cttTic.E_' iTi1 4'.1 't?'c`'i tiCIE t;E'= .U.=.r_' ter_. iner 'icic=-'r;c.v. LIE, 4°:c!.w Li.1. ver, i ki ll Ll CC.lJ c.rl.. U, 1.r1lt' L't_e iEi';_c:,.AEe C) 4 f-p.ri Cl\;[.l-1. e'fi=r'iCE'rlty '-i'• i''•:C; IctJ.Llt= 4'i C. l.,il `v`en FE0Llil_'d bR cl:.i•`Jct'un rWeWulr-r•-.Iller;l.'andZ.;UJ&1 S,E'Vj t?i'- Li m;E,� M E M 0 R A N I> L; M TO: George Muenchow . Comm. Services Jim Karkanen , Street Supt . Lekoy Houser , Building; Uff; ^ial FROM: H. R. Spurrier , City -n^;neer o_ RE: ?Modification to the Shakopee Swimming Pocl Filter System DATE: June 29 . 1984 Introduction : At the request of LeRoy Houser , Shakopee Building Manager, I participated in pump selection for the filter system for the swimming pool because that system has had an adverse affect on the sanitary sewer system. Background : During the review of this System I noted several problems with filter operation and maintenance that I must call to vour attention because they are resulting in inefficient and costly operation of the system. T As 1 said , my original reason for reviewing the pump replacement was in an effort to protect the sanitary sewer system so that the 'low from the backwash is attenuated . I have seen e are facilities to _ that there but these facilitie' seare not -tlady sewer system Secondly. I found that the backwash itself day-to-day operation. long because if was unnecessarily of leaks around the overflow weirs in the filter bed. I also found at the same time that f; based on a schedule and not based on the filters abrlbycto4reed move solids . i While reviewing the filter operation I noticed that a butterfly valve had been adiusted to increase the discharge head on the elistin0 pumps . I was told that this was done to provide adequate head for chlorination. This throttling of the pump discharge has the effect two-thirds of the electricity used to 0 L of wastinC, throttling not only wastes the energy Aerate the pumps . That third as much pool water can be filteredLleavit ingnmoreasolid't onlv �r,e the Pool and increasing the chlorine demand. There is a very simple solution to the r any need, for " problem that eliminates o- a throttling aevice on th- backwash dis these pmps . Finallycharge from, t,-bile in the , that the vent f� chlorine room _ discovered en� an was not operational . �vidc,ntly blown fuse or other si there was a simple problem that retur-neaJthat vent fan :ire _. Pool Filter S-,,stCM Jude 2 to service. I had, suggested earlier that - t was n^eE .. sary tc. install an automatic or manual swCh tc at th 1t �-c-ir fa The exterior switch has been instal is c: , hc�i;`c er , i t i i nst� l] ed at such a height that small emr.lovees would be unable to reach it without same t,'pe. of ladder or stonl Zinc] it shnulc be within easy reach. There- is still a need for an automatic switch that would be activated by the opening of the door to the chlorinator room in the event someone failed to turn on the exterior switch . This does not mean that the exterior switch is unnecessary because it is required in the event a leak is known to occur in the chlorina— tor room. I discovered there were not many pool employees that understood the dangers of chlorine gas . This ,as is an extremely dangerous gas and all pool employees should be schooled in proper safety precautions that must be taken when entering the chlorination room or whenever there might be a chlorine leak. I have a list cf nine modifications that ought to be made to improve safety and increase operating efficiency and effective- ness of the pool filter system. The modifications fall into two categories . Eight I would call high priority items that should be addressed and accomplished as soon as practical and then a low priority item which could be incorporated in long range pians . The high priority items should cost an estimated $22 , 175 . 00 to 53 , 175 . 00. The low- priority item should cost 55 , 000. 00 to 510 . 000. 00. I would like to thank the pool personnel for their assistance during this review. Pool Personnel were extremely helpful . HRS : cah cc Pool Manager , Nancy Raum Geri Hall PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENT r TO SWIMMING POOL I Train all employees particula:-1v managers abour h e rangers of chlorine has and other pool chcr;icals so that they understand the dangers and are able to react properly in the event Of a chlorine leak . Estimated Cost : 5150. 00 2 Lower the outside switch for the far in the chlorine room and install a second switch that operates an with the door opening,. . Estimated Cost : 5200. 00 lb// Repair or modify the operation of the attenuation valve so the rate of discharg sanitary se wank �e to the sanitary sewer is reduced. The attenuation tank holds a 10 minute backwash and can effectively eliminate a major part of the impact on the sanitary sewer system. Estimated Cost : $0. 00 if valve operates or $500. 00 to ,. =-j. .. S1 , 500. 00 if valve does not operate �4 . Train managers in pool filter operation. Estimated Cost : $100. 00 ` —Tns�al'? a pump for the pool chlorinator so that - �` " charge rom the PumPs will the dis- charge i p p 11 not have to be throttled. This item is includes some miscellaneous pipe work. and valve work. Estimated Cost : 5625 . 00 eal ail cracks around the overflow weir f s _n the filter bed by weldinb a plate over the east end of the weirs so that all flow must go over the weir . Estimated Cost : $150 . 00 7 . Install mercury floats and war;:ing lights to signal back- wash cycle . Estimated Cost : 5350. 00 8 . Study the feasibility of using oneI tcn. cyiinders for pool chlorination. Estimated Cost : $100. 00 9 . Repair or modify pool skimmer Estimated Cost : u5 , 000. 00 t0 Xto make sand removal easier. 10,000. 00 Items 1 through 8 are high tion should bpriority items and a budget modifica- e made in order to undertake these if funds are not available . Item number 9 has a relatively low priority but in the absence of a skimmer residue will J the edge 1 continue to build up around b �f the pool creating an unhealthy laver or scum and organic material . MEMO TO: Mayor and Council 9C� FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Projects DATE: May 15 , 1985 INTRODUCTION The City of Shakopee has received a significant amount of TIF for municipal projects from the K-Mart project. There are still proceeds from the K-Mart TIF project that have not been earmarked for specific projects. In addition, initial computer runs estimating the TIF proceeds from the racetrack project indicate a significant amount of money available for needed nunicipal projects for this tax increment district. The proceeds from the racetrack TIF will be available for an eight year priod beginning in 1987 which means the City should decide upon the needed nunicipal projects it wishes to undertake in 1986 at the very latest. POTENTIAL PROJECTS The City Department heads , at their last regular staff meeting, listed four major projects that needed additional revenue support. Those projects were as follows: PROJECTS PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 1. Downtown Streetscape $3 , 000 , 000 2 . 169/101 Junction and 101 Bypass ( local contribution) $2 , 000 ,000 3 . Storm Sewer Construction $4 , 200 , 000 4 . Street Reconstruction 75% x $5-7 ,000 ,000* *The City share, 75% of the cost, has been discussed previously by Council as coming ad valorem levies for these projects. City Council should discuss the four projects listed above and any additions presented at Tuesday' s meeting with the intent of establishing a definitive list of major municipal projects to receive assistance from tax increment financing. The purpose for establishing a definitive list is to prevent the over committment of tax increment monies to major municipal projects during the next several years. Council can also approach this whole subject by establishing a policy that would set parameters for the uses of tax increment proceeds. Such a policy would probably fail to anticipate all future needs for tax increment, but would have the effect of preventing staff and/or Council making tax increment financing the City' s "sugar daddy" for solving all tough project financing issues . ALTERNATIVES 1. Arrive at a definitive list of projects to be programmed by the City' s fiscal consultant to insure that we use our TIF proceeds wisely and do not exceed our present TIF capabilities. Page 2 2 . Discuss a broadly based TIF policy that sets priorities for the kinds of projects TIF proceeds can be used for. 3 . Do nothing. RECOMMENDATION At the very minimum, City Council needs to respond to Alternative No. 1 within the next few months so that we can effecively have out fiscal consultant schedule the use of tax increment proceeds. At the present time all discussions have focused on using TIF for storm sewer (this includes the upper valley) and local contributions to highway. ACTION REQUESTED 1. Establish a definitive list of projects to be programmed for financing with tax increment funds, including at a minimum $4 . 200 ,000 for the storm sewer construction policy/plan and $2 ,000 , 000 for local contributions to highway projects. 2. Direct staff and fiscal consultants to provide Council with TIF programming alternatives for these projects in June. dbb MEMO TO: John K. Anderson , City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox , City Clerk RE: Renewal of 1985-86 License to Only Allow Consumption and Display of Intoxicating Liquor ( Set-ups) DATE : June 3 , 1985 INTRODUCTION The following applicants have applied for a 1985-86 Set-up License . Their applications are in order. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the applications and grant a 1985-86 License to Only Allow Consumption and Display of Intoxicating Liquor to : Jim & Lucy ' s Inc. 201 West 1st Avenue Knights of Columbus Home Association, Inc. 1760 East 4th Avenue Coll-Prahm, Inc. 2400 East 4th Avenue JSC/jms Y 13i MEMO TO: John K. Anderson , City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox , City Clerk 'y✓ RE: Renewal of Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor Licenses DATE : June 4 , 1985 INTRODUCTION The following applicants have applied for a 1985-86 On and/or Off Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License. All applications are in order except for two. Please approve and table the two applications that are not in order. Because of the work load in the building department, the premises of beer licensees were not inspected for code violations. They will be inspected prior to next year renewals. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the applications(s) and grant a . . . license to: Approve/ Table Applicant On Sale Off Sale Approve Jim & Lucy' s Inc. X X 210 West 1st Avenue Approve Friendly Folks Club, Inc. X 123 East 1st Avenue Approve Marlene Berg X 222 East 1st Avenue A01y7 Table Richard E. Cleveland X 828 East 1st Avenue Approve Art Berens & Sons, Inc. X 123 West 2nd Avenue Approve Juba ' s , Inc. X 1100 Minnesota Valley Mall Approve Superamerica Stations Inc. X 1155 East 1st Avenue Approve Cedar Fair Limited Partnership X One Valleyfair Drive Approve Holiday Stationstores X 444 East 1st Avenue Approve Pizza Huts of the Northwest X 257 Marschall Road Approve Brooks Superette , Inc. X 615 Marschall Road Approve Speedway Concessions , Inc. X 6528 T. H. 101 Approve Q Petroleum X 235 West 1st Avenue Approve Coll-Prahm Inc. X 2 400 East 4th Avenue Approve Tom Thumb Food Kar1c-et-s ,x 590 So. Marschall Road A c T LA & DJ Partnership X 5814 Marschall Road Approve JBF Inc. g 823 East 1st Avenue JSC/jms MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox , City Clerk RE: Renewal of On Sale Wine License DATE: June 4 , 1985 INTRODUCTION The following applicant has applied for a 1985-86 On Sale Wine License. The application is in order. Please approve . ACTION REQUESTED Approve the application and grant an 1985-86 On Sale Wine License to Cedar Fair Limited Partnership, One Valleyfair Drive. 6 I JSC/jms MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: 1985 Intoxicating Liquor Licenses C DATE: June 4, 1985 Introduction The following applicants have applied for 1985 Liquor License(s) . Staff has checked for delinquent property taxes and utility bills. The building inspector has made inspections of the premises. The following applications are in order for Council consideration, except as noted. Recommended Action Approve the application(s) and grant a 1985-1986 Off Sale, On Sale, Sunday, and/or Club Intoxicating Liquor License(s) to: Building Application Inspection Applicant On Sale Sunday Off Sale Club + - Pullman Club Inc. X X �k 124 W. Ist Avenue + - XX Corp. & Wittles Inc. X X X 1561 E. 1st Avenue + - Clair's Bar, Inc. X X 124 South Holmes '+ Family Dining, Inc. X t� 6268 E. Highway 101 + Riverside Liquors, Inc. X 507 East lst Avenue John Richard Bernstein X 1104 Minn. Valley Mall + +* Friendly Folks Club Inc.X X X 122 East 1st Avenue E 7 The Weiss Company, .Inc. X 8522 East Highway 101 i, O +*'^ C.R.E. Restaurant Co. X X 1583 East 1st Avenue + R. Hanover, Inc. X X 911 East 1st Avenue e On Sale Sundae Off Sale Club �- - Gerald Franklin Smith 101 East 1st Avenue + Capone's Food Shops Inc.X X 1145 Minn. Valley Mall S.E.L.F. Inc. X X 1135 East 1st Avenue + - VFW Post 4046 X X 132 East 1st Avenue + American Legion Club X X Post No. 2 *�. 1256 E. 1st Avenue + Knights of Columbus X Home Assoc. Inc. 1760 E. 4th Avenue + *** Minnesota Concessions X X X Inc. Canterbury Downs County Road 83 + Application is in order/building is up to code. - Application is not in order or building is not up to code and the Building Inspector is requiring installtion of illuminated exit signs at exit doors by June 15, 1985. * Building Inspector has given licensee until June 1, 1986 to be in compliance with code. ** Building Inspector recommends that Council require installation of double door for lower level by June 1, 1986. *'^* New licensee. Certificates of occupancy shall be issued prior to delivery of license. **** The State of Minnesota Dept. of Revenue has advised that license renewal may not be granted by the City until a tax clearance has been issued. Taxpayer is not in compliance with M.S. 290 .92 and 297A. LIQUOR LICENSE BUILDING CODE INSPECTION REPORT DATE: /29/85 I BUSINESS NAME: Pullman Club PROPERTY ADDRESS : 124 West 1st Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 8 , Block 22 APPLICANT: OCCUPANT LOAD PERMITTED: 96 CUSTOMER USE AREA: 1194 Compliance Non-Compliance Exits Required ( Sec. 33A UBC) Exit Lights (UFC 12 . 114) T T14 Plumbing Fixture (MDH 127 ) LJH Sprinkler System ( Seb. 3802 ) 1 Wall Covering (Sec. 2516G) LJH Electrical (NEL - 84) LJH Ceiling Const . ( Sec. 42-43-47 ) LJH Floor System ( Sec. 4305) LJH Handicap2 ( 2MCAR-Chapt. 55 ) Adequate Parking (Cty 11 . 51-3 ) LJH Signage (Cty 4. 30) LJH Deferred Maint. 1Not required for existing buildings . 2Not required to comply until license is transferred. Orders : Install illuminated exit signs at exit doors , including exit lighting (battery pack) . Compliance Date: June 15 , 1985 Comments : ( 1 ) Sprinkler system, not required at this time . ( 2 ) Handicap does not meet egress and exit , not required at this time . ( 3 ) Restrooms do not comply with Chapter 55 , not required at this time. LIQUOR LICENSE BUILDING CODE INSPECTION REPORT DATE: 4/22/85 BUSINESS NAME: Rock Spring PROPERTY ADDRESS : 1561 E. 1st Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 6 115 22 . 87 87/100 A in Govt . Lot 5 APPLICANT: OCCUPANT LOAD PERMITTED: Bar Area 51 - Back Dining Area 27 CUSTOMER USE AREA: 1091 Compliance Non-Compliance Exits Required (Sec . 33A UBC) LJH Exit Lights (UFC 12 . 114) x Plumbing Fixture (MDH 127 ) LJH Sprinkler System ( Sec. 3802 ) 1 LJH Wall Covering ( Sec. 2516G) LJH Electrical (NEL - 84) LJH Ceiling Const . ( Sec. 42-43-47 ) LJH Floor System ( Sec. 4305 ) LJH Handicap2 ( 2MCAR-Chapt . 55 ) Adequate Parking (Cty 11 . 51-3 ) LJH Signage (Cty 4. 30) LJH Deferred Maint . 1Not required for existing buildings . 2Not required to comply until license is transferred. Orders : Install illuminated exit signs at exit doors by 6/15/85 , including exit lighting (battery pack) . Compliance Date : June 15 , 1985 Comments : ( 1 ) Sprinkler system, not required at this time. ( 2 ) Handicap does not meet egress and exit to and from bldg. Not required at this time. ( 3 ) Restrooms do not comply with Chapter 55 , not required at this time . LIQUOR LICENSE BUILDING CODE INSPECTION REPORT DATE: 5/1/85 BUSINESS NAME: Claire ' s Bar PROPERTY ADDRESS : 124 South Holmes LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N 20 ' of Lots 4 & 5 , Block 22 APPLICANT: Claire Sheffer and wife OCCUPANT LOAD PERMITTED: 52 CUSTOMER USE AREA: 415 sq. ft . Compliance Non-Compliance Exits Required ( Sec. 33A UBC) LJH Exit Lights (UFC 12 . 114) x Plumbing Fixture (MDH 127 ) LJH Sprinkler System ( Set . 3802 ) LJH Wall Covering (Sec. 2516G) LJH Electrical (NEL - 84) LJH Ceiling Const . ( Sec. 42-43-47 ) LJH Floor System ( Sec. 4305 ) LJH Handicap2 ( 2MCAR-Chapt. 55 ) Adequate Parking (Cty 11 . 51-3 ) LJH Signage . (Cty 4. 30) L11t Deferred Maint. 777 1Not required for existing buildings . 2Not required to comply until license is transferred. Orders : Install illuminated exit signs at exit doors and illuminated exit lighting (battery pack) Compliance Date : 6/1/85 Comments : ( 1 ) Sprinkler system not required at this time. ( 2 ) Handicap does not meet egress and exit to and from bldg. Not required at this time . ( 3 ) Restrooms do not comply with Chapter 55 , not required at this time . LIQUOR LICENSE BUILDING CODE INSPECTION REPORT DATE: April 15 , 1985 BUSINESS NAME: Arnie ' s Friendly Folks Club PROPERTY ADDRESS : 122 East 1st Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION: East 26 ' of Lot 8 , Block 23 APPLICANT: Arnold Theis OCCUPANT LOAD PERMITTED: 66 CUSTOMER USE AREA: 648 Compliance Non-Compliance Exits Required ( Sec. 33A UBC) H. Exit Lights (UFC 12 . 114) Plumbing Fixture (MDH 127 ) Sprinkler System (Sec . 3802 ) L.H. Wall Covering (Sec. 2516G) L. H. Electrical (NEL - 84) Ceiling Const . (Sec . 42-43-47 ) Floor System ( Sec. 4305) L.H. Handicap2 ( 2MCAR-Chapt . 55 ) Adequate Parking ( Cty 11 . 51-3 ) Signage (Cty 4. 30) Deferred Maint. M a p,ina 1Not required for existing buildings . 2Not required to comply until license is transferred. orders : Compliance Date: June 1 , 1986 Comments : (A) Does not have exit lights (B) Plumbing fixtures & restroom not in compliance with Chapter 55 . Not required to retro fit at this time. (C) Sprinklers not required. (D) Illegal extension cords in use . (E) Nonconforming ( illegal ) exhaust hood being usedin ground floor kitchen area. Due to items A, D & E the bar is in noncompliance with the code . Electrical nn attached sheet . r LIQUOR LICENSE BUILDING CODE INSPECTION REPORT DATE: 4/12/85 BUSINESS NAME: Shakopee House PROPERTY ADDRESS : 1583 E. 1st Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION: . 32 A in Gov' t Lot 5 & . 77 A in Gov' t Lot 6 6 115 22 APPLICANT: Shakopee House Properties OCCUPANT LOAD PERMITTED: 175 downstairs - 325 upstairs CUSTOMER USE AREA: 4817 Compliance Non-Compliance Exits Required ( Sec. 33A UBC) x Exit Lights (UFC 12 . 114) LFH Plumbing Fixture (MDH 127 ) LFH Sprinkler System ( Sec. 3802) LFH Wall Covering ( Sec. 2516G) LFH Electrical (NEL - 84) LFH Ceiling Const . ( Sec. 42-43-47 ) LFH Floor System (Sec. 4305 ) LFH Handicap2 (2MCAR-Chapt . 55 ) Adequate Parking (Cty 11 . 51-3 ) LFH . Signage (Cty 4. 30) LFH Deferred Maint . 1Not required for existing buildings . 2Not required to comply until license is transferred. urders : Compliance Date: June 1 , 1986 Comments : Restrooms do not comply with Chapter 55 . Retrofit not required at this time for existing building. Exit from lower level inadequate. Installation of double doors at top of stairs would meet intent of Chapter 33 . Suggest Council request double door by June , 1986 . LIQUOR LICENSE BUILDING CODE INSPECTION REPORT DATE: 6/17/85 BUSINESS NAME: Richards Pub PROPERTY ADDRESS : 911 East 1st Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 & 2 Block 16 , East Shakopee Plat APPLICANT: & P/0 vacated alley Richard Hanover OCCUPANT LOAD PERMITTED: 275 CUSTOMER USE AREA: 2513 Compliance Non-Compliance Exits Required ( Sec. 33A UBC) Exit Lights (UFC 12 . 114) TYH Plumbing Fixture (MDH 127 ) Sprinkler System (Sec. 3802 ) Wall Covering ( Sec. 2516G) LFH Electrical (NEL - 84) TYH Ceiling Const . (Sec. 42-43-47 ) LFH Floor System ( Sec. 4305 ) Handicap2 ( 2MCAR-Chapt . 55 ) Adequate Parking ( Cty 11 . 51-3 ) Signage (Cty 4. 30) "P14 Deferred Maint . 1714 1Not required for existing buildings . 2Not required to comply until license is transferred. urders : Compliance Date : Comments : Does not meet Chapter 55 Handicap Req. for egress and exit to and from building. Not required at this time . Does not have adequate on site parking. Under contract off site. Building does meet intent of code. LIQUOR LICENSE BUILDING CODE INSPECTION REPORT DATE: 5/30/85 BUSINESS NAME: Capone ' s PROPERTY ADDRESS : 1145 Minnesota Valley Mall LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 , Block 1 , Valley Mall 1st APPLICANT: Gary Capone (Capone ' s Food Shops Inc. ) OCCUPANT LOAD PERMITTED: 443 CUSTOMER USE AREA: 4187 Compliance Non-Compliance Exits Required ( Sec . 33A UBC) LJH Exit Lights (UFC 12 . 114) LJH Plumbing Fixture (MDH 127 ) LJH Sprinkler System (Sec. 3802) LJH- Wall Covering (Sec. 2516G) Electrical (NEL - 84) LJH Ceiling Const . ( Sec. 42-43-47 ) LJH Floor System (Sec. 4305 ) Li H Handicap2 ( 2MCAR-Chapt . 55 ) Adequate Parking (Cty 11 . 51-3 ) LJH Signage (Cty 4. 30) LJH Deferred Maint . LJH 1Not required for existing buildings . 2Not required to comply until license is transferred. urders : Compliance Date: Comments : Restrooms do not conform to Chapter 55 , Not required at this time . LIQUOR LICENSE BUILDING CODE INSPECTION REPORT DATE: 5/30/85 BUSINESS NAME: Granny' s PROPERTY ADDRESS : 1135 East 1st Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4 & 7 , Block 31 East Shakopee - 6 115 22 . 65 APPLICANT: 93 . 8 ' S 300 ' in Govt . Lot 4 OCCUPANT LOAD PERMITTED: 110 CUSTOMER USE AREA: 1491 Compliance Non-Compliance Exits Required ( Sec. 33A UBC) LJH Exit Lights (UFC 12 . 114) LJH Plumbing Fixture (MDH 127 ) LJH Sprinkler System ( Sec. 3802 ) ( 1 ) LJH Wall Covering (Sec. 2516G) LJH Electrical (NEL - 84) LJH Ceiling Const . ( Sec. 42-43-47 ) LJH Floor System (Sec. 4305 ) LJH Handicap2 ( 2MCAR-Chapt . 55 ) -777- LJH Adequate Parking (Cty 11 . 51-3 ) LJH Signage (Cty 4. 30) LJH Deferred Maint . 1Not required for existing buildings . 2Not required to comply until license is transferred. urders : Install exit lighting (battery pack) . Compliance Date: June 15 , 1985 Comments : ( 1 ) Sprinkler system not required at this time. ( 2) Restrooms do not comply to Chapter 55 , not required at this time. i LIQUOR LICENSE BUILDING CODE INSPECTION REPORT DATE: 5/30/85 BUSINESS NAME: VFW PROPERTY ADDRESS : 132 E. 1st Ave. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: E2 of Lot 7 Block 23 Ex E 15 ' of S 62 ' APPLICANT: S 10 ' of N 80 ' of Lot 6 Block 23 & W 36 ' of N 70 ' of Lot 6 Block 23 OCCUPANT LOAD PERMITTED: 118 Hall area - 56 Bar area CUSTOMER USE AREA: 2357 Compliance Non-Compliance Exits Required (Sec. 33A UBC) LJH Exit Lights (UFC 12 . 114) x LJH Plumbing Fixture (MDH 127 ) Sprinkler System (Sec. 3802 ) Wall Covering ( Sec. 2516G) LJ Electrical (NEL - 84) LJH Ceiling Const . (Sec. 42-43-47 ) MH Floor System ( Sec. 4305) LJH Handicap2 (2MCAR-Chapt . 55 ) Adequate Parking (Cty 11 . 51-3 ) LJh Signage (Cty 4. 30) Deferred Maint. 1Not required for existing buildings . 2Not required to comply until license is transferred. Orders : Install illuminated exit signs at exit doors , including exit lighting (battery pack) . Compliance Date: June 15 , 1985 Comments : ( 1 ) Sprinkler system not required at this time. ( 2 ) Restrooms do not comply to Chapter 55 , not required at this time. LIQUOR LICENSE BUILDING CODE INSPECTION REPORT DATE: 4/18/85 BUSINESS NAME: American Legion PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1266 East 1st Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4 & vacated Legion St . APPLICANT: American Legion OCCUPANT LOAD PERMITTED: 94 front/160 CUSTOMER USE AREA: 1129 front - 2168 back Compliance Non-Compliance Exits Required ( Sec. 33A UBC) LFH Exit Lights (UFC 12 . 114) LFH Plumbing Fixture (MDH 127 ) LFH Sprinkler System (Set. 3802 ) ( 1 ) Wall Covering (Sec. 2516G) LFH Electrical (NEL - 84) LFH Ceiling Const . (Sec. 42-43-47 ) LFH Floor System (Sec. 4305) LFH Handicap2 ( 2MCAR-Chapt . 55 ) LFH Adequate Parking (Cty 11 . 51-3) LFH Signage (Cty 4. 30) LFH Deferred Maint. LFH 1Not required for existing buildings N8t fequifed tri comply until iictrhse is tfansfeffed, Orders : Compliance Date Comments : Handicap ramp will be installed by July, 1985. t: LIQUOR LICENSE BUILDING CODE INSPECTION REPORT DATE: 4/18/85 BUSINESS NAME: Knights of Columbus PROPERTY ADDRESS : 1760 East 4th Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 5 115 22 4. 07 - N 499 . 7 ' of NW4 SW-14 Ex E 975 ' APPLICANT: OCCUPANT LOAD PERMITTED: Downstairs Bar 90 - meeting room 103 - Upstairs 236 CUSTOMER USE AREA: Downstairs Bar & Meeting Room 2655 Upstairs 3570 Compliance Non-Compliance Exits Required (Sec. 33A UBC) LFH Exit Lights (UFC 12 . 114) x Plumbing Fixture (MDH 127 ) LFH Sprinkler System (Sec. 3802 ) x ( 1 ) Wall Covering (Sec. 2516G) LFH Electrical (NEL - 84) LFH Ceiling Const . ( Sec. 42-43-47 ) LFH Floor System ( Sec. 4305 ) LFH Handicap2 ( 2MCAR-Chapt . 55 ) x Adequate Parking (Cty 11 . 51-3 ) LFH Signage (Cty 4. 30) LFH Deferred Maint . LFH 1Not required for existing buildings . 2Not required to comply until license is transferred. urders : Compliance Date: Install illuminated exit signs by 6/1/85 . in all assembly rooms . Comments : ( 1 ) All basement levels over 1500 sq. ft. are required to be sprinklered. (New const . requirement . Existing bldgs . not required to retrofit at this time. ( 2 ) Building does not meet handicap requirements - not required to retrofit at this time . LIQUOR LICENSE BUILDING CODE INSPECTION REPORT DATE: 4/17/85 BUSINESS NAME: Valley Fair PROPERTY ADDRESS : One Valley Fair Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: OCCUPANT LOAD PERMITTED: 299 Downstairs/176 Upstairs CUSTOMER USE AREA: Compliance Non-Compliance Exits Required ( Sec. 33A UBC) LFH Exit Lights (UFC 12 . 114) LFH Plumbing Fixture (MDH 127 ) LFH Sprinkler System ( Sec. 3802 ) LFH Wall Covering (Sec. 2516G) LFH Electrical (NEL - 84) LFH Ceiling Const . (Sec. 42-43-47 ) LFH Floor System ( Sec . 4305 ) LFH Handicap2 ( 2MCAR-Chapt. 55 ) LFH Adequate Parking (Cty 11 . 51-3 ) LFH Signage (Cty 4. 30) LFH Deferred Maint . LFH 1Not required for existing buildings . 2Not required to comply until license is transferred. Orders : Compliance Date : Comments : Building (Red Garter Saloon) in compliance with all applicable codes . _�3 C} r /'( TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Vox1and, Finance Director RE: Unfunded Project Costs (Audit Follow-up) DATE: May 30, 1985 The management letter for the 1984 audit has recommended eliminating the deficit in the Other Improvements Fund. This deficit is from three old projects. One is Market Street which did involve some work. Also involved are Fifth Avenue and Thirteenth Avenue which had engineering work done on them. Total costs for all three projects are $21, 034. 75. The costs of these projects are listed in the Budget each year so that there is a record of them and they are not lost. Carrying these projects on the books the way we are is not the proper way to account for them because we are not taking any action to assess the costs. Also, it does not show readers of the Financial Report (Moody' s) that the City is dealing with the problem of the fund deficit. The Capital Improvement Fund was set up to handle this type of situation. Using this fund to finance the costs already incurred does not change the ability of the City to recover those costs in the future. The Auditor had some concern that the General Fund should pay for these projects because the costs were incurred before the Capital Improvement Fund was established. HoweYery % do not %haro tho %am@ ewMpor*l and fo@j that th@ Off i§ Appropriat@ to U, iq Alj� i!!es 1. Status muo. 2. Transfer from General Fund. 3. Transfer from Capital Improvement Fund. Alternative number 3. Move to authorize the transfer of $21, 034. 75 from the Capital Improvement Fund to the Other Improvements Fund in order to eliminate the deficit in the latter fund which is a result of old projects. MEMO TO : Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson , City Administrator Jn/ RE : Disorderly Conduct at Events Ordinance DATE : May 31 , 1985 Introduction Bruce Malkerson forwarded the attached copy of a Bloomington ordinance regulating "disorderly conduct at events" to Rod Krass. Tom Brownell and I have looked at the Bloomington ordinance and we decided to bring it to City Council ' s attention. Background The City has not had a significant amount of experience with disorderly crowds at public events . The City of Bloomington has and they passed the attached ordinance. Tom Brownell felt that an ordinance similar Bloomington ' s might be useful for Valleyfair and possibly Richard ' s Pub. In addition, City staff has discussed the need for some kind of ordinance that would allow the City to regulate tailgating. Alternatives 1 . Continue with the City ordinances now in effect and make no changes until the need is apparent . This would avoid Council having to spend time developing an ordinance that might not fit the circumstances three or six months from now. 2 . Draft an ordinance similar to the Bloomington ordinance that would give the City the tools to deal with a problem should it arise after the opening of the Track. City staff could contact Bloomington and discuss the enforcement of their ordinance and/or contact the League of Minnesota of Cities for sample ordinances from other communities . Having an ordinance in place that would address potential problems when the Track opens might provide the Police Department and City Council with the tools to set the tone of activity the City will permit at the Racetrack beginning with day one. Recommendation Staff recommends alternative No . 2 for the reasons discussed above . If Council concurs with this recommendation we will also discuss tailgating with the City of Bloomington to make sure that this ordinance handles tailgating as well. Action Requested Pass a motion directing the appropriate City staff to draft an ordinance regulating disorderly conduct at public events based upon Bloomington ordinance Section 12 .07 . JKA/jms w2.06 the commission of any of the (8) Aid, abet, allow, permit, or participate in 7�- Icts prohibited in paragraphs (1) through (7) of this subsection. (b) Prostitution prohibited. Prostitution is hereby prohibited andpc�ae doing any �f the acts set forth in subsection _) of this section shall be guilty of�iiiira�i �aer• I 1958 $ 174.03; Added by Ord. No. 66-72, 12-19-66) (Code, �R ea .� SEC. 12.07. DISORDERLY CONDUCT AT EVENTS. is to describe (a) Purpose. The purpose of this section e certain conduct at events onduct which aaespdefinedectator hoerin anwhch are found toreparti cipanit at an event andb found t e be ac nuisance contrary tothe coming P public welfare of the City of Bloomington. performa(b) Definition. "Event" means a theater ncto owhich show,the other entertainment oathleticcontest cpublic is r amusement, .or a public gathering admitted. (c) Conduct prohibited. The doing of any of the following acts without authority of law by any person or personsfane i vulgarherebyoreclared to be indecent language so disorderly s conduct audibleunlawful: offen- (1) Using p sive. (2) Appearing at an event in an intoxicated condition. (3) Engaging in brawling or fighting or in conduct tending to reasonably arouse alarm, anger or resentment in others. playing (4) Intentionally throwing any object, thing or article onto a stage,erson or field or area where an event is conducted, or ich may be conduct of theelevenot.endanger any p property or interfere with the orderly play field or area where an (5) Intentionally running or going onto a stage, playing event is conducted. bthe management or an (6) Smoking in an area where signs have been ho posted the sign. official of the City prohibiting smoking and indicating (7) Obstructing an aisle, blocking a properly marked exit, or taking or obstructing the seat of another. (8) Failing or refusing to leave an event when directed to do so by the manage- ment of the event or an authorized representative. (9) Gaining entrance to an event for which a charge is made without having paid such charge and without the permission of the person in charge of the event or his authorized representative. (d) Conduct at Metropolitan Sports Area. ithin (1) Parking Lot without authority of law by The doing of any of the followingany person orwpersons tis Metropolitan Sports Area parking lot hereby declared to be disorderly conduct and unlawful: (A) Engaging in any conduct which creates a risk of bodily harm to any other person or damage or property. (B) Engaging or participating in the playing of any organized sports act- ivity without specific written permission of the Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission. of (C) Engaging in the striking, kicking, orbulr notng glimited etos by basebalet- ls, ween persons occupying said sports area lot including, footballs, frisbees, soccer balls, basketballs, tennis balls, or any other such projectile which may be thrown, struck, or kicked. fire in any place other than a receptacle (D) Building or maintaining a which raises the fire off the ground. (E) Starting or using a fire and thereafter failing to extinguish the fire when it is no longer used. (2) Sports Area - It shall be unlawful to sell or offer for sale any ticket or ro- any event, article of clothing, food, beverage, or any other moveable property on any perty owned, operated, or leased by the Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission unless authorized by the Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission or its lessee. (Code, 1958 $ 174.04; Added by Ord. No. 69-26, 4-14-69; Ord. No. 69-89, 11-10-69; Ord. No. 77-31, 5-16-77; Ord. No. 77-46, 8-8-77; Ord. No. 78-71, 12-4-78) SEC. 12.08. UNAUTHORIZED ENTRANCE UPON SCHOOL PREMISES. (a) Definition. The word "school" as used in this section shall apply to public schools as defined by Minnesota Statutes Annotated 120.05 and 130. (b) Conductprohi, b_ited• No person or persons who are requested to depart from the premises of a school upon demand of the person in charge of the particular school or the all (Code,n1958e$t174.05of e Addedlbyo0rd1.eDistrict No. 69-57,s7- 14-69)use to do so. 147 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council p p FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Scott County Governmental Study Commission DATE : May 31 , 1985 Introduction The City Council is aware that the Scott County Governmental Study Commission has been meeting since the beginning of 1985 . The Commission has spent all of its initial meetings taking testimony from Scott County officials, but plans to begin taking testimony in the various cities around the County. The Mayor and I have attended the Scott County Mayors and Administrators Meetings which have focused on what type of testimony cities might give. Backizround Councilmembers who have read articles in the local newspaper regarding the testimony before the Commission by Scott County Officials are aware of the types of topics being discussed . The focus has been on the various types of county government permitted under state law , and how various county elected officials feel each of those governmental forms would work in Scott County. It is anticipated that the Commission will be seeking comments from both citizens and other local units of government as they move their meeting around the County. In anticipation of testifying before the Commission the Scott County Mayors and Administrators Group felt that each city in Scott County should seriously consider passing a resolution that would state the position of that city. In addition, the Mayors and Administrators Group felt that Scott County cities could have the largest impact if their recommendations to the Commission were similar. Council should consider the various alternatives the Study Commission will have before them and then. consider passing a resolution supporting one form or another . Because the County Manager Plan more closely parallels the organizational structure most Scott County cities have the Mayors and Administrators Group have drafted a sample resolution for each community to consider ( resolution attached) . Alternatives 1 . Approve the proposed draft resolution, The intent of the Mayors and Administrator Group is to provide a draft that might guide each City Council , not one that would be copied by each City Council . 2 . Discuss and add or delete items to the draft resolutionOfch to appropriately reflect the individual thinkingt° County community . This is the approach that the Scow Mayors and Administrators Group anticipated would be taken by most cities. It a'-lows each res lu`ni ty to reflect their unique concerns when l position at the City Council level supporting 3 . Take no for overnment. Council any of the alternative forms of county g might wish to consider this approach if it feels it is inappropriate to make recommendations to the Study Commission . This approach would be contrary to the approach members cities of the Scott County Mayors and Administrators Group have used during the last three and one half years as issues have been presented to the Scott ttoBfind outprecisely it is the desire of the Study Commission how citizens and other governmental units in Scott County feel about the alternative forms of county government . If all the local units are silent on the issue the Commission will not have the assistance it desires in arriving at a recommendationthat witsdtruly c tizensreflect the local governmental concerns of the units. Recommend2tion I recommend alternative No . 2 for the reasons listed Mayors It was the consensus of those attending e and Administrators Group meetings that cities should take a position (not necessarily ctoerepresenty the one ltheedraft community resolution) tlthe and designate a spokesmanThe Study Commission ' s hearing in each respective community . Study Commission' s hearing in Shakopee is tentatively scheduled for 7 : 30 P•m, on August 7 , 1985 . Action Requested 1 . Discuss the proposed draft resolution and make changes where appropriate . 2 . Direct the appropriate City staff to draft a formal resolution for City Council action at its June 18 , 1985 meeting estab- lishing a formal recommendation regarding the form of county government the Shakopee City Council wishes to recommend to the Scott County Governmental Study Commission. JKA/jms DRAFT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, tax pavers expect and deserve government that is efficient, as well as responsive to their needs; and WHEREAS, improved productivity resulting from the most efficient governmental form can result in a reduction in taxes necessary to support that level of governemnt; and WHE.''LAS, The Scott County Governmental StueY Commission under the Statutory Provision outlined in Sections 375A.01 - .li is cnargeu k'itli Stiiuyi o and g _al -ina L he existing form of County government; and WHEREAS, the Scott County Governmental Study Commission encourages public discussion and input into their decision making process. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA, that: 1. The ,ity supports the work of the Study Commission in a-ialyzing the existing form of Scott County Government. 2. The :ity believes that the best means to provide effi :.ient, responsive, and productive County Govern- ment is through the adoption of the County "tanager Plan as specified in Minnesota Statutes Section 375A.03. 3. The City encourages the Study Commission to give serious consideration to recommending the County Manager Plan in their Final Report. Adopted by the Mayor and City Council of this day of MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator p FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Ordinance No. 171 , Extending Parking Restrictions in the Central Business District DATE: May 30 , 1985 Introduction and Background On May 21st, Council directed preparation of an ordinance to extend parking restrictions in the central business district on a year round basis with the exception of Sommerville north of Second Avenue. The attached ordinance does so. Alternatives 1. Adopt ordinance as drafted. 2. Amend ordinance as drafted. 3 . Do not adopt ordinance as drafted. Recommendation Offer Ordinance No. 171 , An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, amending Shakopee City Code Chapter 9 entitled "Parking Regulations" by Repealing Subd 3 of Section III of Ordinance No. 107 Enacting a new Subd 3 of Section III of Ordinance No. 107 and by adopting by reference Shakopee City Code Chapter 1 and Section 9 . 99 ,. and move its adoption. JSC/jms ORDINANCE NO. 171 Fourth Series An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, amending Shakopee City Code Chapter 9 entitled "Parking Regulations" by Repealing Subd 3 of Section III of Ordinance No. 107 Enacting a new Subd 3 of Section TIT of Ordinance No. 107 and by adopting by reference Shakopee City Code Chapter 1 and Section 9.99 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION I: Repeal Subd 3 of Section III of Ordinance No. 107 is hereby repealed. SECTION II: Parking hours in the central business district There shall be no parking on the following streets in the central business district between 2:00 A.M. and 6:00 A.M, to-wit: Second Avenue, First Avenue and Levee Drive between Sommerville and Fuller Street and Lewis Street, Holmes Street and Fuller Street between Second Avenue and Levee Drive SECTION III: Penalty Provisions Adopted Shakopee City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions applicable to the entire City Code including penalty for violations" and Section 9.99 entitled "Violations a Misdemeanor or Petty Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION IV: When in Force This ordinance shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City of Shakopee and shall be in full force and effect on and after the date of said publication. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of , 1985. Mayor of the City_ of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Prepared and approved as to form this 29th day of May, 1985. City Attorney MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: LCM Constitutional Amendments and Dues Proposal DATE : June 7 , 1985 Introduction Attached is a memo from the League regarding proposed amendments to the LMC constitution to be taken up at the League ' s Annual Meeting next week. Shakopee ' s representatives should have Council ' s direction on how to cast their vote. Background There are five proposed amendments: 1 . Amendment No . 1 simply inserts gender neutral language . This is a housekeeping amendment . 2 . Amendment No. 2 places a new condition on new members requiring that they pay any outstanding assessments along with their dues before becoming a member . This is a housekeeping amendment benefiting existing members. 3 . Amendment No. 3 adds a clause stating that the prior year' s dues are in effect if no new dues schedule is adopted. This is a housekeeping amendment. 4 . Amendment No. 4 enables the cities at the annual conference to adopt additional rules governing its proceedings. This is a housekeeping amendment. 5 . Amendment No . 5 enables written amendments from the floor without prior notice if it is a germane amendment to a proposed amendment . This amendment reflects action taken in the past and allows for flexibility in voting at the conference on proposed amendments . Alternatives Council can direct its delegate to the League ' s Annual Conference to vote for or against any of the five amendments. I have talked to Stan Pesker, LMC General Council , and he has assured me that all five amendments are indeed housekeeping in nature and do only what they appear to do ( ie . no surprises) . Dues The LMC Dues & Service Committee has recommended a 3 year dues schedule with a 7 . 5% increase for 186 and 6% increase for 187 and 188 . Based upon a population of 10 ,830 our 1985 dues were $3 , 966 and our 1986 dues would be $4 ,264 , 1987 $4 ,519 and 1988 $4 ,791 . The second memo attached is from Don Slater and lists the reasons for the dues proposal which he acknowledges will exceed the rate of inflation. Alternatives 1 . Approve the three year dues schedule as proposed . 2 . Approve only the 1986 proposal at $4 ,264. 3 . Propose a three year dues schedule based upon the same inflation indicator cities have their LGA pegged to. 4 . Other. Recommendation I recommend alternative No. 2 . With the loss of Federal Revenue Sharing almost certain I do not feel we want to lock ourselves into 6% increases in 1987 and 1988 . Action Requested 1 . Pass a motion directing the Mayor or his designee to vote in favor of the 5 proposed amendments to the LMC constitution at the June 1985 LMC Conference . 2 . Pass a motion directing the Mayor or his designee to vote only for the 1986 7 . 5% increase in annual dues at the Annual LMC Conference in June 1985 . JKA/jms ilii 11111111111 L [ILI] league of minnesota cities May 21, 1985 TO: 1985 LMC Annual Conference Delegates FROM: Stan Peskar, General Counsel RE: Proposed Constitutional Amendments Following are several proposals for amending the League Constitution at the Annual Conference. When any change to a section is proposed, the entire section is set out with deletions indicated with strike outs and additions shown by underlining. 1. Gender neutral language ARTICLE IV OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES Section 2. The president and vice president shall each be elected annually for one-year terms. Twelve directors shall be elected for three-year overlapping terms. In 1974 four of these shall be elected for three-year terms, four for two-year terms and four for one-year terms; thereafter four shall be elected annually for three-year terms. Elections shall be held at the official business meeting at the annual convention. Officers shall hold office for their designated terms, and until their elected or appointed successors have signified their acceptance. The newly elected officers shall take office immediately after the close of the annual convention. The immediate past president shall serve as a member of the board of directors ex officio for one year, so long as he or she holds municipal office, and the president of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities shall serve ex officio. Section 5. The president shall be chairman of the board of directors. He The president shall preside pres!4eat at the annual business meeting and all other meetings of the League, but he may designate others to preside instead €er-h€m. He The president shall appoint all committees established by the board of directors or by the constitution and shall appoint representatives of the League to such non-League bodies as may be appropriate. Section 7. The executive director shall be the chief administrative officer of the League, subject to the general supervision of the board of directors. He The executive director shall be appointed by the board of directors for an indefinite period and may be removed by the board of directors. He The executive director shall appoint the League employees and shall administer the League office and the League services. He The executive director shall prepare an annual budget of revenues and expenditures for the I 80 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 C61 2) 227-5600