Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/19/1985 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items DATE: March 14 , 1985 that Richard (Dick) Cheever ' s youngest 1 . We learned today We have sent daughter Lynn die of thetFrancis p Council and City - flowers on behalf uBois called regarding a resident on 325 Fuller Street. 2 , Jane D problems with their old sewer epoais The owner is having P the sewer line . is faced with replacing just run to a sewer that this private sewer line doesn ' t t it is extra- in the street , but turns at thecurb that and runs half main This Engineer a block to the intersection. The odinarily expensive to repthatmthere nt the a• numbers of private and I explained to Jane has not participated lines like this in town and that the City in financing repairs or replacements to these lines in the past. st 3 . All of you probably read thetaJohn ein Neelya rece we regarding the parkinived .ne I newspaper g ticket sent a copy of the article to the w that Street Department an etting the Police Department letting o�tsmandothankinghey themrongbehalf some good press for their of the City. t4 , Attached is a copy of the letter to Louisville and Jackson township establishing the townships ' fire department fees for 1985 . Since the fees went up nshfor 1985 we enclosed a there has five year comparison toovshow 1 981 chargestow Thist information been little increase is being provided inrdin the receive esquestions from the township officers regag 5 . Attached is an update on the AMM and lU Comm Commission cus efforts Management to get the Metropolitan Waste Control Study completed and impslemented . Please for improvementnote that the study makes 75 recommendation . able worth 6 . Attached are several items keeprelated abreasttwith her comparable which are provided you worth study . 7 . Attached are the revenue and expenditure reports for the period ending February 28 , 1985 . 8 . Attached is the building activity report for the period ending February 28 , 1985 . 9. Attached are the the Baseball Li mina �e s of the March 4 ghting Committee, � 1985 meeting of 10. Attached are the Of the Downtown Ad Hoc uCo s of the February 27 1 8 Committee. 9 5 meeting 1 1 , Attached is a Association address to he mailing mass ouncilletterPresident.mthe M ' the mailing for Council information. Minnesota Grocers Cities does not support We have enclosed the , The League of Minnesota wine in grocery stores ,. grocers position Grocers ' proposal should contact nJud ave for sale of questions about the 12. Attached are Y Cox. 21 Y the minutes of the Januar Meetings meeting of the Ener y 17 and February gY and Transportation Committee 13 - Attached is the agenda for the the Energy and Transportation C mmitteeh21 1 1985 meeting of mee 14. Attached are the minute„ of ting. h Of the Shakopee Public UtilitiesCommission.y ' 1985 meeting 15 . Please note that the Board of Equalization date tentatively set for June 4 , June 11 and June 18 , s have been 16 . Attached is the bill we a-e introdu Malting Tax A cing ppealto resolve the Rahr . The effective date is the Possible so unless we go to Court earliest won t, whatever out of Scott; Count court settlement is struck p sho uld 17. Recently the only result in taxes -lost for. 2 years ( 1984 and 1985) , U. S . Supreme Court ruled in Garcia vs . Antonio Metro Transit Authorit Y governments are San subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) . This was effective 2/19/85 , but cities are uncertain as to how to react. It will likely aff(�ct two areas in Shakopee ; Police scheduling and our practice of Paying time in the form of compensatory time off.vt, Labor Relations Associates has told us to developa now. Gregg P You posted .and I will kee Plan but sit tight for 18 . Attached is a memo from Georg that there is a ,,e Muenchow to Judy Cox indicating on the river thisSummer. tiho is planning to provide tours 19 . Senator Bob Schmitt has introduced a bill this session that would take the Sludge Farm site out of Met Council ' s Waste Siting process giving it to :`tWCC to sell . 20 . Attached is a nice letter from Janis Obst from Murphy ' s Landing. JKA/jms Paying tickets reminder of seasonalarkin need 3 p g to clear Shakopee's snow 43y John Neely ?u lisher Guilty as charged"is what I wrote on Talking B u s i n es s .he parking ticket as I prepared to send it back with my check last week. Shakopee, you knqw, has seasonal parking. That's something I usually never think about because we have two Firemen, police, medical and ambu- small cars and a large garage. I never lance personnel may be needed at park on the street, never that is except anytime. when I"car sit"for a friend while he is in Our streets must remain open Florida for a week. regardless of weather conditions. And transportation isn't only needed for the I can't say that I was totally unaware major emergencies we all think about. of the parking regulations,but when it is What would have happened if your hot 50 degrees outside,who's going to be giv- water heater sprung a leak about 9 p.m. ing out tickets? Sunday night and you didn't know how to In short, I did and....they do! I did il- shut of the water?I could go on with these legally park on the street and,yes,even "what ifs",I've made my point. when it is 50 degrees outside,they do give out parking tickets! For snow removal, our city is excep- tional. I've always been impressed with Don't think for one minute that I'm just how quickly and efficiently they get complaining about my ticket. Seasonal our streets cleared. We all owe our parking is very much needed in our city. thanks to equipment operators, public The need exists because of what hap- and private, who keep Shakopee open pened Sunday and Monday—snow and even in the worst of conditions. lots of it. Parking restricted to one side of the Let's not forget too that it is our police street or the other allows city snow plows department that also supports the clean- to clear our streets faster. Getting our up efforts with those unforgettable streets cleared fast isn't just a matter of reminders—parking tickets—when we convenience, it's a matter of safety. forget to do our part. rte` - at E at ti le Y ,e3 am ent ,et ; th le the net % he `r ✓ la � s me "• AN CII, . Ts g $, s ,reg ''.le "►e it 5 ke s at r Of F F s >A Jev. y r al at Y a h 1.4 ezi i n .d r zrK.4 -Tv Loa '.c✓r l le- CITY cCITY OF SHAKOPEE INCORPORATED 1870 129 EAST FIRST AVENUE, SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379-1376 (612)445-3650 March 5 , 1985 Mrs . Magdalena Vyskocil Town Board of Jackson Township 1840 West Mound Street Shakopee , MN 55379 Dear Mrs. Vyskocil : The standby fee for 1985 under the terms of the current contract is calculated as follows : 1985 Fire Department Budget $406 ,605 Less Pumper 1601000 Less Rescue Truck 125 ,000 Less Fuels 3 ,000 Less Total Salaries 55 ,295 Plus Officer Salaries --. -- 9 ,950 Plus 1985 Pumper ( 1/5) of 73 ,260 Est. $210 ,000 42 ,000 Plus 23 .53% of 1975 P. S. Bond Levy ------25-J-76 1985 Cost to be Allocated 1401436 Over Budget for 1984 - 5 .269 Total Cost to Allocate for 1985 Fees $145 ,705 Unit 84/85 Assessed---Value I Standby Fee Shakopee $ 96 ,677 , 159 89.56 $1302493 Jackson 5 ,509 ,710 5 . 10 7 ,431 Louisville - 5 ;760 ,278 -.� ------- 7 ,781 $107 ,947 ,147 1-0000 $145-,705 Assessed value figures are per Tom Lannon, Deputy County Auditor, February 28 , 1985 , before any adjustements for fiscal disparities or tax increments. Mobile home values are included . The cost of the new pumper was budgeted at $160-,000. The bids came in higher and the order was placed for about $210 ,000. Included in the fee is the $210 ,000 over five years. The $210,000 figure is subject to adjustment when the final cost is determined . The cost of the rescue truck for 1985 will be spread over five years after the truck is purchased . The 1985 budget has $125 , 000 included for the rescue truck, but is deleted in the calculation of the 1985 standby fee. The Heart of Progress Valley AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Mrs. Magdalena Vyskocil Page Two March 5 , 1985 The addition for 1984 is figured on the same basis as the current contract , i . e. 1984 department cost less hourly wages and fuel as compared to the budgeted amount used to determine the 1984 standby fees. Enclosed is a copy of the fire department budget for 1985 and a copy of the debt service levy. If you have any questions , please contact myself or Gregg Voxland. Sincerely, John K. Anderson City Administrator JKA/jms enclosure j H W W OaLnoo 0 1 Ln 10000000000000 1 0 I O I O I LM II d ON0LnO 1 C% 1000 Ln 1.0 O Gam. -+ HTT N -" U) I r\ I U) OOON C% U"NLn (DOTcl) I T I 3 U N . I ^ I I I 1 II O cn e'1 N I r l I to V O� c+1 I N 1 I I IO I IO it H a4 rn I u9 1 .-+ 1 0 1 0 1 0 II W LL I i I 1 cn I cn I .T II A I I I I I i 11 PQ O O Ln O O O I LM 1 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O I O I O I O I LM 11 a T — O% OLnO I O` I O O O Ou1 %000O000 0 I I O 1 0 1 0 11 ¢ H �T .T C14 to i r` i U' O (D N Q\ 64"N Ln '1 i T i .T i T 1 %O 11 N I t` I e'1 •--� ^-r r� c'7 I N ( �D 1 �D I .0 II C7 OG H Ln I Ln O I.4 I I I I cn I cn I .T II x w I I I I 1 I II a. yr <rj- 0 cn cn M cn w w w a cn W > W U J U O W 0-4 f1. A rU-i d > W O �-r H O a z a H O U 9 z v] 0G cn W W O H cn rr a. W .. m w a = U 0-4 d ►-� H H r-+ a d z d o cn cn m O H 0-+ z cn C w co w d a o O z , a+ Z W 6 0 W W cn U = W ¢ H cn cn a a. O M a C7 �+ z 64 U U W z W a H w a w w _ m W w z cn w o z = " 9w a �--4 z a En 04 C4 -cd a. WHa W O H d r-+ U ¢ w � ¢ dd a. a. oa � wHw > zaars. m m r-. U rn W d d W ►- W O a ^ O = dor O W x oG z H O O a 6 a z H to cn w w 3 6 c4 W a. P. H E- P. W U H H H A to u W O O O — O — O O N O N O O . 0 00 0 O O •-+ O 00 O cn .T .T Ln un H .-, N M en •-r N N M Un 10 r- CYN O+ H it ON N N N N cn M Cn P9 Cn en e'er fn (n i't Ul •!e -k ^+ O O T T T T T T -k .T T T T T T .T T T T T T T # o a c G7 n H r r r In N N ►-• f-•• [17 H H ryy+ ••r 2 r< Z ro r• O O rD ^^ r+ A r-a N m m A G n m m y rr N A A rq w A X rr r• [=9 m C (D G rr h O r. < r• 10 O w "V ro p rT O m m ►t ro rr C r• G � 5 r• - tv CA ^t ro rn rT b O G Y• O O ro r-• D L. G. O E3 v G Ca O A 03 *-4 O (i ro r•s rr 00 rr m rr, p.c G rD m F3 ra (D m G n. r1 w [n t, O r• ro r• <n r• to v w r• G 'C m m to a N m r •• rr W !D Rf (D rn N m < = G r° m O o o - o rr a rr •t G O Iy O r rr (D r• O ° m G 9(p t" O 'r A 0 O H O a "O m m B rr m G ►t o rD m •° r• m ro <n m ro m < W ro p 't < N ro m r• r 7 O to rn r• I rT O w r- r= CP r- o c .c rt (D w o o � g y m• D 9 o w o m '"r O ° G r• O rr m O m b ro r+, S •O w m r• r• O (D (D m d rr r (D '1 ro r• In rr b � M d rr r- ►t G �C O 1 A � rr r. ►t w r m t rD m r• N (D G p O b m rt r• O m ro O Ptl A ro R C m O" m a 5 rD m ro s✓ w rry co rr A ~ rD ro •< O G 00 O O G =• < rr m ^J Y• M •i17 M ^� w o 00 rri G. rT . M r. ro O O A r• w �- J3, O r• CO rr r O O (D O r++ p to O m f. T � S A rD (D O n O O r• rn O rr r• b ►t rn ro t T ' — MEN MM n n C= r O— G C - 10 i L N �.- C r Co K I C 'Dc Itn 00 v r R. r. ce (p � I 47 G i � � f: I C � ��• ? C �C f7 r .•• I r N N N r• � _ •X — u N O V T �! O• C C c � w.nCu� .- N COO, C •G K (C Y _ _•v I r .�t T C7 r• Irv, ftn p � � m C y r•� T r � ! x n n •e C, C n o p C 1 T C G r r - — • r • r P 4 r r s r A r r t r r • r r J r j r = _L • . P N+w y A -. .iI ... A r • N Vt r r r w L ` r 'n - u n r 4 11 ) Y U C.1 - 2 T D r7 n ?i r• 7: oc• C r••G. �'S 1 R N C 2 :1 r 1yr)r TT 1 �) .r U 2 L r :1 C. 2'T •ll n T f ... 7C z to.. — t n) . . )• �. r - C r L a 7 O J V .0 '40 T r A- fi r N � J•-AN NJ• o P W r +INN-• N ..N a) p N P P w w(r V A N., A Pro P A P A N 1 D T L �. � v v Z rV W P .0 V .�•J J r r r W SIV.' w t. y �.r w •G Y N L r M N W W A � � A 1 r r 0• rV�r P A •J r.+wNWav, wv+ry P O. QCT a/IP r A e) rC � i•� 6L Lw O G r .0 T N A C i► 7 P N r c N - r C: N D.� .J W J P ? —v w n. A N N Vl r L• J A D SNNAa7 NCy)Jk:,A t:. -ZG N. ON y 1 vlOOOv)pOOOOv1Nv'OG:.tOO P O�nOG•O ' r 0 0 0 0 0 f]J G L J•�O c•:]O O r G.]A v.n O O G O � C ti N A %A JD NNN W r �N Ir +V IV V r v W V J -.;yam ar NIV r N.V•J)P r i NCO rJJ N1.n? W A ••�T ']A w V1. IV -M J - - - 00 N A _ N CC K A C - - c r 4= AP - _ n .7.PP V W o. r P '� ti rP W N v)N Ort•1 r .OAA AWAOGan'm'o NoO 0..1 7vlr N uc.or0001-,000aaA1.) a oo.n o OrA cvao vA u G GJ O G)O J J O J u G J u 0 U v)O:7 U an u IJ )•) -4 WI N n !T.T tw N P A R A W A f.1. J vi W .Q N L,U J P v V) r N A A r) 3 .O n P,nro C3 or,0i PN no 0 no vl o".orA 0C no v+000000000aoc�0000v)uo o.noo s � vl .o s o AWW 1 O J O•` - _ _ r PPP IVW W N PAAAw A O ON N.p NOO CV,-4 Nr N A A O2 •O Or.3Or 000000 o P v)0000 •Orn an O.pr Ar'1 covinoac]0000noa�G _�aoo.nou o.,Oc) ..a„ ¢r CITY QP S AKOPE t " INCORPORATED 1870 129 E. First Ave. - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650 � ! t� r'. 9 August 23, 1984 Mrs. Magdalena Vyskocil Town Board of Jackson Township 1840 W. Mound St. Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Dear Mrs. Vyskocil, Attached is a copy of the Fire Department's 1984 Budget request with the City Administrator's (Manager's) recommendation. The $160,000 for the new pumper is shown as reappropriated for 1985 because delivery is not expected until then. Bids were opened 8/20/84 and the truck and equipment totaled $221 ,000.00. City Council received the first draft of the 1985 Budget 8/21/84 and has a work session scheduled for 8/28/84 and a public hearing scheduled for 9/4/84 at 8:00 P.M. Also, attached is the Fire Department's list of needed capital equipment projected for 5 years. This list is a planning tool and the items are put into the annual budget each year as appropriate. If you have any questions, please contact John Anderson or myself. Sincerely, Greg. Voxland Finance Director GVM:mmr Enc. 1 rogress Standby Fee Data 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 Shakopee $130 , 493 $77 ,022 $109 ,154 5114 ,582 $ Louisville 7 ,781 4 , 569 6 , 895 7 , 188 1 ,149 Jackson 7 , 431 4 ,132 6 , 198 6 , 585 6 ,955 Note: 1985 pumper payment starts 1986 rescue trucx payments start I''r1MOPOLITFin UJAITE bnTROL COmmiffion Twin C,c�Rreca GR Y, MAR Jean Bergal 222-8423 MWCC Chair Endorses Recommendations March 7, 1985 In Just-Released Management Study The chair of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) today outlined a series of steps he will urge the commission to take to continue improvements begun in recent months in its internal structure and cperation.s. Peter Meiltsma, who was named commission chair last summer, rade the statement in response to a just-released management study cf the MWCC by Touch: Ross & Co. The report makes 75 recommendations " in 19 areas related to agency organization, management and operations, but does not rank the issues in order of importance. "While we' ll be responding to all the recommendations, there are five major priority areas where we're going to move most quickly," Meintsma said. "These are chances in our oreanizational structure, improved communications with the communities we serve, improved long-range planning, evaluation of our rate structure, and implementation of a data processing system for the commission." The MWCC hired the consulting firm to conduct the study in response to a recommendation in a 1983 report on the agency. Known informally as the "Soland Report," it was done by a commission established by Gov. Perpich and chaired by former Metropolitan Council Chair John Boland. more 350 METRO/OUARE BLDG. 7TH 6 ROBERT/TREETf fAInT PAUL mn 55101 612 222.8423 "This study confirms that we do an excellent job of operating one of the largest and most effective wastewater treatment plants in the country, and it recognizes the improvements we've made in recent months," Meintsma said. "At the same time, it points out areas where change is needed--and in many cases, where it already has begun." "There was enthusiastic support for the study among commission members, our staff and the communities we serve," Meintsma said. "I have no doubt we' ll build on the report' s recommendations to make a good agency stronger and I'm also confident the report's findings will help build wide community support for the changes we're making." The work of the consulting firm in conducting the study was directed by an 11-member special task force chaired by Judith Fletcher, an MWCC member. Other members included Boland and Vern Peterson, executive director of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. A complete implementation plan for dealing with the report' s recommendations will be presented to the MWCC at its March 19 meeting. But at a workshop for commissioners held today to discuss the report, Meintsma outlined the following actions in the five priority areas. The actions include those already under way and those planned for the future. The areas are: Organizational structure. The report recommends a reorganization at the commission aimed at correcting problems, including fragmentation and a lack of focus in some areas. Meintsma said some important changes already have been made, including hiring of a chief administrator and deputy administrator. An internal auditor will be hired by April 1 and an internal audit committee will begin operation May 1. A review of the MWCC's organizational structure already is under way, he said, and it' s expected a reorganization will be complete by July 1. more Communications with Communities Served. The report recommends that the commission's relationships with the 102 communities that use its services be improved, and Meintsma said the process already is under way. Some actions being planned include sending a newsletter from the MWCC chair to the communities, and setting up a mechanism for regular meetings with groups of communities, Meintsma said. "Both these actions will provide a forum for us to answer questions communities may have--and give us valuable feedback about what we're doing," he said. Already, Meintsma said, he and other commission members have increased their contacts with community officials. Data Processing. The report says the commission' s current data processing systems are inadequate and recommends a series of changes. Meintsma said the commission is in the process of converting to a fully automated management information system. A decision will be made by May 1, he said, whether to hire a permanement systems analyst to supervise the change, or to contract out the work. The overall change to a new system could take three years, but "will greatly enhance our effectiveness and efficiency," he said. Long-Range Planning. Traditionally, much of the MWCC' s planning has been focused on capital projects and a one- to two-year time period. The report recommends that more long-range work be done and coordination with the planning of the Metropolitan Council be improved. A decision on where in the agency the long-range planning function will be carried out will be made--and the new process will begin--by July 1, Meintsma said. Rate Structure. The report recommends that a comprehensive study of the way in which rates for MWCC service are currently set be undertaken to resolve structural problems, reduce the complexity and broaden the involvement and understanding of communities. Meintsma said such a study will be done and will involve communities closely in the process. A new rate structure should be in place by Jan. 1, 1987, he said. more "These actions, which I ' ll be asking the commissioners to support, will take us a considerable way toward resolving some of the major issues in the report," Meintsma said. "Certainly, there' s a lot of work to be done and we're excited about doing the job. At the same time, I hope people don't overlook the good things we're already doing." He cited as an example the awards the MWCC received this week at the ninth annual Energy Saver's Award of Excellence Competition sponsored by the state Department of Energy and Economic Development. The commission was recognized for a $4 million energy savings at the metro treatment plant in 1984. 30 Memo To: John K. Anderson, City Administrator— From: Marilyn M. Remer, Sr. Acct'g. Clerk ° 'J-' Re: Comparable Worth (Informational) Date: February 27, 1985 I spend Tuesday, Feb. 26th at an all-day session concerning Comparable Worth. This will update you as to the progress of the study. The morning session was a comprehensive orientation to FOCAS (Flexible Occupational Analysis System). The system itself is twofold, one a job analysis system and two, a compensation system. Simply put, finding out what people do on their jobs and putting some value on it. There has been comprehensive member participation starting with suppling copies of job descriptions and workshops. These were useful in the construction of the preliminary questionnaire. Approx. 2,000 employees have completed the preliminary questionnaire, adding lists of tasks that weren't covered. I have been assigned to the Occupational Advisory Group for the office questionnaire. Currently they are in the process of compiling and editing the result of the preliminary questionnaires. The OAG's is a key role in the process. Reviewal of the questionnaires to make sure all tasks are covered and to condense the material due to much repetition. Other employees will be assigned to Technical Advisory Groups to rate tasks & values. There will be a different group for each factor. The tasks will be rated on three factors - Complexity - Importance & Unfavorability. Some highlights of the FOCAS presentation are: It is a task oriented questionnaire rather than a whole job approach. When completed the system will provide specific data such as what work employees are performing, how much time is spent on jobs, knowledge, skills & ability data is collected and each individual employee will have a unique specific job description as the result of the completed questionnaire. FOCAS enhances employee satisfaction because employees participate in the questionnaires, the system is understandable, has well documented standards of comparison so it tends to be fair, will encourage dialogue about job content between employees & management, and reasonable judgements about value of jobs will be determined. Several more sessions will be held to assign and review task values before the questionnaires will be ready. After completion of the questionnaires some benchmark (common) jobs will identified, compared and averaged. These benchmarks will be used to tie into the market for values. Ultimately the City will have to decide upon whether supervisors or an appointed committee or both will review employees' results. Some adjustments may have to made for performance/efficiency to get to accurate levels. Example, one employee performs tasks faster and more efficiently than another, but his points value tends to be lower because the total task value is computed by %time spent. A review will be needed to make these kinds of adjustments. I will try to answer any questions you might have. MEMO TO: ALL EMPLOYEES n � FROM: MARILYN M. REMER, SR. ACCT'G. CLERK {/ v RE: COMPARABLE WORTH COMPENSATION STUDY DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1985 The City of Shakopee has joined with many other cities in Minnesota to jointly complete a study of their compensation programs to comply with the Comparable Worth Act passed by the Minnesota state legislature last August. The law requires that each city complete a study and report the results to the State by October 1985. The attached explains the study and the process by which it will be completed. This process was selected because employees are involved throughout the process. While it may require you to be away from normal job duties at times, your involvement is important to the final results of the study. Please read the attached and if you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. JOINTti-CITY COMPENSATION =Y WHAT IS A COMPENSATION STUDY? In response to the Minnesota state law on comparable worth passed in 1984, all cities in the state of Minnesota are required to study their compensation programs to determine if equitable pay relationships among jobs exist. Cities must report the results of their studies to the state by October 1, 1985. Many cities within the metropolitan area, as well as outside the metropolitan area, have joined together to complete their studies. Control Data Business Advisors, a consulting subsidiary of Control Data specializing in human resource management, including compensation, has been retained to assist these cities in completing the required Compensation Study. In this way the process is economical, and the results are consistent across cities. HOW WILL THE COMPENSATION Control Data Business Advisors will use their job analysis STUDY BE DONE? and evaluation system named FOCAS to complete the study. The data obtained and analyzed will give each city the information it needs to meet the state's reporting requirements. WHAT IS FOCAS? FOCAS stands for Flexible Xcupational Lnalysis System. FOCAS as a job analysis system is used to describe jobs and the work employees perform. DTplo,yees are asked to provide information about the jobs they perform using specially designed forms called Occupational Analysis Questionnaires (OAQs) . Because employees know the content of their jobs very well, their input into FOCAS assures that accurate and comprehensive data can be gathered. FOCAS job data can be used to address a variety of human resource concerns. As a compensation tool, FOCAS is used as a job evaluation system to assign a more accurate arra consistent value on the work employees perform. With FOCAS, jobs are graded based on the tasks performed in those jobs. HOW DOES FOCAS JOB ANALYSIS Job analysis is the process of gathering information WORK? --_,,,_ about jobs and work in order to make effective decisions about those jobs. The foundation of FOCAS job analysis is the Occupational Analysis Questionnaire, or OAQ. The OAQ is a listing of tasks, arranged by duty arra subduty, that an emplovee in a given job area might perform. Employees complete questionnaires to describe their jobs by marking the -- - appropriate tasks arra estimating the percentage of theix._ time spent on those tasks. Time Spent Prof_les: The OAO data are analyzed and individ!ial job descriptions, or Time Spent Profiles, are produceiL Jobs are described in terms of duties, subduties, and tasks, and the amount of time spent on them. The data are taken directly from the responses on the questionnaire. Before FOCAS is inulegented. emvloyees review •-he Profile with their supervisors to make sure it is accu:at&. Bencl. rk Job Descriptions: Individual_profiles are com^ine3 to create Group -ob descriptions. From these, benchmark jobs are identified. (Benchmark jobs are jobs common among cities that have large numbers of people in them. Benchmark jobs are used to compare salaries to those paid by private industry and by other governmental jurisdictions.) A FOCAS benchmark job description lists the job's duties, subduties, and tasks, and the average time spent on each duty ani subduty. It includes a narrative summary of the job's highlights. The FOCAL; job analysis process provides the capability to document accurately what people do on their jobs. FOCAS job descriptions are useful in job classification arra evaluation, but also for recruiting and in career planning and development. WHAT ABOUT FOCAS The glldp, or level of a given job is determined by the JOB EVALUATION? value of the tasks that make up the job. The tasks are assigned values by large numbers of supervisors who know the work well and who represent the entire organization. An advantage of the FOCAS job evaluation system is that the value data come from many sources arra are consistently applied to all jobs in the job family, regardless of location. FOvA.S job evaluation, then, is the method used to assign grades or levels to jobs in an understandable, equitable, and consistent manner. WHAT DO I NEED TO DO? Because the FOCAS system relies on information from employees, supervisors, arra Personnel, you may be asked to help in this process. If you are, remember that you will be representing many other errployees who were not asked to participate. Take that responsibility seriously and participate as effectively as you can. HCW W= THE RESULTS OF THE It is too early to know the answer to this question, but CCMPENSATION STUDY AFFECT ME? you will be kept informed of the results of the study and what the next step will be. If you have any questions, please discuss them with your supervisor or with your personnel representative. This is an inportant and arrbitious project; and the information that will come from it will increase the effective use of human resources. G MRM (Metropolitan Area Management Affociation of the Twin City Area March 8 1985 1 t 1985 TO: CITY MANAGERS AND ELECTED OFFICIALS OF ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING SHAKOPEE IN JOINT COMPENSATION STUDY FROM: William S. Joynes, Chairman MAMA General Labor Relations Committee SUBJECT: JOINT COMPENSATION STUDY STATUS REPORT February Progress and Completion 1. Meetings with elected officials were held in Mankato on February 6 and in Brainerd on February 13, 1985. 2. Occupational Analysis Questionnaire Workshops for outstate cities and utilities were held on February 6 and 7 in Mankato and Brainerd; over 500 employes were invited. 3. Copies of preliminary Occupational Analysis Questionnaires were sent to all organizations so they could conduct their own workshops or ask employees to work individually to complete them. Over 600 questionnaires were completed in this manner . 4. The Occupational Analysis Questionnaires were revised from workshop information and reviewed with Subject Matter Experts as needed . 5. All organizations were asked to submit names for membership in the six Occupational Advisory Groups. From this pool of names, the Personnel Committee selected up to 20 people for each group. 6. Control Data Business Advisors held a three-hour FOCAS training session on February 26, 1985 for all people selected for Occupational Advisory Groups. 7. The first meeting of each Occupational Advisory Group (OAG) and the Occupational Analysts from Business Advisors was conducted on February 269 1985 after the training session. At this meeting OAG members became familiar with the Occupational Analysis Questionnaire and their responsibilities. (over) CITY MANAGERS & ELECTED OFFICIALS March 8, 1985 Page Two 8. Four regional libraries joined the study. Workshops were held in Detroit Lakes and Minneapolis to receive further information about their jobs. 9. The Study now includes 122 organizations . h w v m t+sin --- o- tfurther n rti� t o by �.,. The Pe. s;,nuel o�v:ti ..w.. Yened . o ra , ig� ', n , outstate cities, utilities and libraries. A letter was sent to each organization asking for nominations. March Plans 1 . A FOCAS Training Session will be held for city contacts at Control Data Business Advisors. City contacts from outstate cities, utilities and libraries may attend on March 11 and city contacts from the metropolitan area may attend on March 12„ 1985. 2. The Occupational Advisory Groups will meet as needed and will be scheduled by the Occu,.pational Analysts assigned to each. 3. Names for valuers will be solicited from all organizations and selected by the Personnel Committee. 4. The valuing process is scheduled for mid--April . 5. Occupaticnal Analysis Questionnaires will be reviewed by the Personnel Committee and sent to the Labor Relations, Committee for final approval. 6. A special Occupational .Analysis Questionnaire Workshop for firefighters not able to attend the workshops in February will be held on March 11 , 1985. E1413J-F cc: Personnel Committee { l,•V t,: W W w W - VI V� N N N r r r r✓1 N N w CD • w W W W W w W W W N N N N N �+ LOGO •. P r w w w W r, IV rV 4 • C c D C •C P W N-►G V r W N-•O P O• ulwww W w W w rr-r rrU • N r)z OD K'.a V P • �" C V UW NW NC ♦ �' COC VU ut P UW NNP L"rj .0 ♦ Nr AO ut ti a. m T rn r- y z z �-1 'p m'V A m m r t!-4 -f -'n c 2 m r n V r Z 2 2 O D 2 Qf O O r•-1-I p p .. •r p •+�I P ri m M r C O••r+ rl.r D.1') D H .mow mO?c-In rwnp6)OSr -4 O CmC nArs n I n fA 41 to X rq IF r 0C •y p 0 z r1 pm i� U rr♦>L rA-,Y m V • Z A 2 1r*1 w rrn -1 r r•-1-f 1- 0 in-1 f M t1 C)rq A rI r 2 z r r n O z c r n rrvi n S + < -� � rl .'C2 1 Oyf1 tiS f•1M t�K 4', to r r1M f1 il,rl 2 • r . m-+� Dip O :UG G rnx V: - m C M mOD 1'12 Z mv,r,v, T j d D - m ' m- I V'rn '" "1�' rr mcl o .Z+• "I C S o r: MMD r,y A C ncD -f m 2 m& >C Vi i•.'u y O r. C p f1 M z l7 47 4,y -i a c7 r i7-n G,< Cl 2 T M= -100 N C2flo�+2 zrr M MUO T-t<-fo s' t2 V, TD z Y n + rmcir - An .-)-1 X111 y D W x u m z O 7C m 0 R A.A 2 D 2 tri• • D Z 4 too / We m r D-r T v m D z c)z z 1+Iy • Q Virm I C yT71 m z 1 r .4 mm 2 0mmn T TY D .ti M A yhAr. N I m 9 C(A 'D- 1J in in V z .T r«rm r)z SZ n yr s m .17 y <3 mMml 1 X ftD In �. m(1 :O ]DM nrAMmOM -1 O M in ;D 0;a M22r-I r1r y V) .w•-+ i 22 A ! . AG,� �rar•• nI'1H myy i HC O T V Az T) 7D DV t T Tr -V" -.m 7y (ATM -fA CG rt Cud 1 -y n c O T r CrH V ` r .-a 'q e•a rn �•-)y Vj I•I j ;• rr r� z N p H A 2 M r)0 10 o m k M-n m -t 1 M 1 � -, y rn ! m M o +. mrl r+, 2 y WWI 0f mmy f G07 DH ( LO : yAy 2. ! W i Myr y2 3 f u I w W y I 1 i i rq i w rq i JJ c Z C 1 I m 41 + M ! r VI v. v+.,�r y N t7 ! W VI r N W N + q V f •D Cv VO•ututO 1 y V - f •O ut NCD NP w j j U W Gt•LP UUPu�OG7uL C� P Pup! G'j i:,du u wUu Z,Z.U L;l :1,,00t..uu WO u UV t_ f•1 0 P G"i N O n r ri 0 t.]O u U O y V u V 0 0 0 0 w u ) O V iJ u 0 u 0 G O car,0.7 o u u t:f t:) z ) <_ � D a z I C-) o z ..• W N N Q N u1 w P •pO r P r N. .- r:�..i =+CID I r p O W OWI •;;I:� NO �CNO 00t:JdOGC:)N 00 C')OO PO V•O •p r W M('(7P 1J1 N r ut P OPr Or O O OCL A G GJ d d i;.U U LD O O i:,G+r N G U U t2) .p G U V ul ':G O O U G O ut co V G O O C7 u V O O C)ccpy m j 00 01 0000000n00d w OOOd u10 a)00 O -OdOtr"1000 000 OOn00 O O Od <..'.j . . • ., . • •; . • • .; . • rel 1 OOac>00000dOOgOd O UodO0000d d : O OO CDn6d00mOOOOdC1O o O� Z ! OOO O4.7nO COC)dao 00 0 CD 004)` 00o00 O C30000000c) 0000oQ0 C O Q C f CO V f Wgo 3 r 1 I A • ,• ♦N O V ~ I + f ur r to b • + 1 • WP SN - CD-O O N-wN0 I w 0 uuuO Q 1 V Ny-%A•OrWAI +CW Gr7 NIV uO NC ; 1 ry OOD O Cb CD 00 VI O CDD 00 0 0 •D P N O u1 O N d 0 0 N 0 0 0©N OO V V W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n O P O M kA •OO m 0O C)U O N V w O N OO 0 0 0 r G O O D uI O d-r u1 C1 b 00 0 CD t00 :0 O D y a i I } N i a I 'r P OD co O - N r t PrW V � rWN to I + V rW r r N r P.•w P•O -+ r+r f( �y�vI V VI r.a O w w CD-• ! + 1{ d W G: V1 N OD u 1 N V 1 0 D V P O D 0 0 o N 10 Do P O N V d 0•O O r N O o.p N r N V,c-•O P W O r I n 0 O O D O'0 i •C O.u)OD VN W VCJOP 0.. P V O•+ PGO- I .W O�COy-.u10 W .O VU•L)•000 I O 0 00 ."C ['.,fA) i P 0 O A In-+ut W d 0 0 P N w d d V d 0 OD Vt d ut O C ut N y OD ut V O ut OD b G) 1 0 CO O q ►+ O-r n 0r OO M O O O O O O O O W N O ut O w O O O V O O O O N O p V N uI n 00 0 0 00 O O 0 z T tJP GouIOG +0000000 w w W O NOO u:JO ! .0 C: 0 00 u100- %.n 000000 c?O O Oc9 r) 3- 9 1 i 1 f i Y 1 1 Y 1 11 f i / i l l i I i f ) i rq .+ w _ 1't N r r O I w u1:-•✓f CO O N • O • G ! • -' w:w=• r O V I O D _ O D O P W C D W O ! U t r V P U O D V O P N N r N 0 Ln:n r) i ! I I 4 w W 4 W W W W • W rt W W W L. W W L.W W W T r � � • 00ROo 06 r rr rt P v+v'vl 0 V1%.n vM%P YC .0 rt Q rt '0 L4 N— • P rt a n r r r r w w w N N n z 00 4 rt �= �` rt GI- �•O rt C." ! Clw l�.-•L'W N -�vP n0 V! 1 11 U x ?J r-n n n , n 702lnby T- 2n A 'u;a N •"'•-4riz O O t t m►.0 Om►w OHOai z 0 M b C o N N n 2-i C Cb T o" $ D C(.1 z A -i.+ -.1 { 1 z nz n n-r1m m A M cn S "Onzonr-1 } ! 1 I 1 w N r•, : nl vi :u -4 -1 G1 v>a S 1.1 c: O• (1 2 O I I i I T n,l r r m m rl .. N Z n V, In c) o C 1 r ' r f to T T (n T ! i � N -IN z 'sz ! i tr r 0007 �.irmUr�� z z I T H C: 1.-r r m r c. b .Z7 m Vi C X m !qo c" m ! O carr Nn Cn Vr• Z'z .-a M x j , Z — I o A N U) ;aS V rl 1 x n b (n 0 m A { o m c c y In v m w as m I r*j -r r x m r" I m Dn OON-1T V10 j p '71 ! o ! n n z r m z r M I 3 i n III c �, ! H 3 V1 TDz�r z m czrnc j o fco m j m � r0 n ff In i I 1 In • �.1 ! � i Oc r-, o f r 1 w r r I w ! j. In t r w w o w P �n v, w I a r ( n Z I I A N W - C. W O O I N ! I •O.O n 3 C W v ucy N NU'.'JU U• u I P c.OGInC:+Ju�... W Gw u 4"'1 A r U t..7 U N N vl L7 0 u 0 p ra C7,-D CJ U D• i ! ! i � r a z 1 «, z C) o 1 I -a O A N H + V O N:N O N • I 41 CD %ACiJ V,0•V1 Nf O O W W O ( G G i:1 O O CD C:V Ci C3 U ('1 - V p 000000 O t d d o0 0 ! onoo 0 0 0 000doa000c� z d cS o a � 0000 � o � o p0000a000 c 1 I � rn f'1 v D o N ~ •I .I 1 F P P V 00 P N W W- .0 V V1O W W N N VI V7 O 1 N •i •: • • • i • i •I • •: • I• s. • • •t• • •- • • • p O 1 �I C3 O N ry cl v W000a0000 c T I i OD O O P - P p00 P P w 0400t>OOt/ 000 D n 1 j {{ N co PP i ( WOD +q • • • .O r V W I N A r r M m • �.P ti Vt: • C { 3 V V O V r Oo .O r -4- '.M v,00 to r V p n f I i � un N P 00 N W O P P000,0 00 v.p I M ! ! O 41 _Q_Q N %.M C3 Q P V V 0000 6n P-00 O j - I •i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Zt i N O O V V p 0 0 N N W P O 00 O p N 0 0 0 '9 UCa i - `L:+00 r r N NOOC)Opvf G�pO n D - r a r r 1 i 1 1 • t r c ! m cti f* d W O` N N P P �1 V • • - 07 -I N I I ' n o �n r'i G� p f -n ! A c� Ln i o r i j r 3 ., a i , III a z-c ry { r I ro j I j a s co V �. m N C f I n. n A A I I k # r r ■ t • N`O`c + •r R rr rt W W W w .,,l Wwf+�ww w�.lhM1hN NN NN • j R Pt R r • • IC NO IC 10 OC VP W WNNr r NNttr W �'�or W W WNr R _ R R N G + I C: R .O '! R �O �'W -+C C C C=- C C �'C P C r N A N C N W O • " C N•`C C NCS' n O V' O O M D2 n 0 y Sn 30mmc�-+ V-1-1 Vr VHV)CriID2y (A 'O c M 'DUIOU! C C•1 C HCrnCOrn'•+xA %U rtO rn .'aZr(tip CO C C rn J rnrnrnDcb 2C9 H 2 31 X C - , A 'O 3.r00C7C 1. C—"m V A AbZz .'t7r f`1 P'I -i-• H A 2 2 H rl H V - n w Cl N T -1 r C 2 <m"A. Ct b r- r c 'I.9 CAJC y A n �+1a C «• rr �1 U1 r N a ti Z 1 r r"i rl 1 1•i v,�a �1 fry V q t vi r- • L O �+A r U z y r.H ti 3I D pw -+n Mr S O yH n H 0 4 rt700 •"IHM rnG7 O O 7 D O +'1 i ri r Hr'+ m r -4Z rn �a 7_ z om -n inOO-<32 �l r!rn n Z 2.`. r1am 0r; -n r: rt Z7 � Z a 1 y Y Oy2 r'n Gl RG tiH L y r V, ioyy n z O In H rn Urn 2CHCn (A ISI I rn --4 M ill V) n2 m X m0 V. rnCnymrn P y r Cs a) M 1',2 1 1 1 1 < < N i -i c:U G f)rI rl G,(A C HA m,-I rf2 ar D Vi nr 'TIm / T n H.�D 2 z rn k n n z `Ho r ur, za C: to I� arnAn vrr -(r, C) I ( z o = _ _ H w � DP-I �hY N a ()r�n v rr, ., a Tv, • z o m -o k mit 1 r. A -1 n .-. -C M A I • x r to H2 y1'1 N< ! 1 V Q N :/! L, DmZ .aH ,z rn i w rn m i oo zz 1 •. 1 • , cC ." Mm (A)i ro I I y y ca i Hn rnn I .. ., U? inr Lrl -I (•I wA CC ( A � a V) ! •�y n I I Y D 19 a 2 Z C 477 { I 1 ; ! ( { cl 3 e � (' I + W P j I r • • • • J • I N r W . N W N = A V v r r • j W t � I 0, ow w c N NJ wPr cxjrti aPp�o m • •i • • • •i • • • • • •. • • • • • • • • • • • • • •- • • • • • • •I ..1..� OC2 J V P C.1P N 70 UC:+N LVr Pu ti;3.OL :3 L;) VK>twl.y N J It u-+W:p W W (-, O 00 O !v W O W P JIGC.DO CJ�1 your rO r>r CSUu:�rP VGOO V O rONr NOtp a O ! l r / i I 1 I z c k 1 4 I I 30. rn + J n z 7 n A { co 1 N W P _ P r N ! .; r r ,• O 10 PO.W=r W N �•r A r N r tV ..• .p a r O Cn FJ • • •{ r 'b 3 N N •11 VI I • • . • � N W VI I O W r O'O W r0 r C:)y( r r• • •i O N I N 0 :: O. I P l y - V I :N •A M(AN N r 40�7..• U U A I UGc.ir�NvtPN.oPG V VONCJU6 %..n%.A •�V �.-: I •I • •: !� • C3 O 1 000:O W OO Vl vlOOOO 1 O0 W OOD.N O O vl OOOO W •r O O O O C'J O O O CS OO G L]O p O O O O O p OO O O O O O O 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 -4 Oi O OO O O O U O O G:fCpOOOOOpOOOOOOOOgOO O C:+ O CDOOOOOO H I i I I z-4 r J O• r r ' • • r r • r . r N r W t +N +f rut Oo.N W T rV W V Oco OyP r \I 00 OP,ON • '�• ♦ ♦ ..• • i r r r ! :O rtN VON W OO Oo .putD I V V co I N © .p O CO O w 00 n_•I y O 00 O I O P OP W i OOOONOyPO V 0 W O%OOOOrt rp 0' r W O W r vt OOOOw �OOr.OD 10Ot OOOAP OoOr w O-••ON-gut N00 O 1I O 11 7,A N O V n I ( � ( N r r V Ir r r • O 1 m w i � w o PrwNvt P N 0 Aoc cfN 0 •i ro r0 V . • I rN• r .•y W.O 00 +r V I rr+W .0rlp W gyp= C.1 r1 00 P N N H t f00 co 10 .Q O D : N N N W Cc o W VP 11 A N W P : O N r C,n • • W w O O P W O O r m O 0 0O.0 N r co N r.O p N mi 0 0 0-4 Vi 0 V ,O O� O N j P to D N N O C o f V 7 N O p O O O G P N N O N r N-•p p C n O O V N-+O N co V V 7 D O O O 00 O O W O W P r000o ON W O O O O 0NOO P O O O1, O OVW OL. . ..0 V O0 O O V C1V P OOON +O.Or Z V- C) 4,N0%0 N po[,W a rI In p I'1 i W N j r ..• N CD O O V P rPP 4-'n O .ONr Cc O P W CITY OF SHAKOPEE BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT February, 1985 PERMITS ISSUED 6564 - 6574 Yr. to Date Total Previous Year Number Number Valuation Number Valuation Mo. Ytd. Single Fam-Sewered 3 3 195 ,500 3 5 304,500 Single Fam-Septic - - 1 1 68 ,000 Multiple Dwellings - - - - - - (No.Units ) (YTD Units ) - - - - - - Dwelling Additions - - - 1 2 61 ,100 Other 2 2 200 - - - Comm. New Bldgs . - 3 1 ,439 , 781 - - - Comm. Bldg. Addns . 2 3 237425345 - - - Industrial-Sewered - - - - - - Ind.-Sewered Addns . - - - - - - Industrial-Septic - - - - - - Ind.-Septic Addns . - - - - - - Accessory/Garages - - - - 1 75000 Signs & Fences - 2 23145 2 2 2 ,800 Fireplaces/Wood Stove - 2 6 ,500 2 3 12 , 700 Grading Foundation - 1 11 ,000 - - Remodeling(Res . ) - 2 15 ,250 2 9 622,800 Remodeling( Inst. ) - - - - Remodeling( 0 m)or 2 2 650 5 7 223 ,999 TOTAL TAXABLE 9 20 434135371 16 30 7425899 TOTAL INSTITUTIONAL - - - - - - GRAND TOTAL 9 20 4,413 , 371 16 30 7423899 Mo. Ytd. Mo. Ytd. Variances 1 1 1 1 Conditional Use 1 3 - Re-Zoning - - - 1 Moving 1 1 - - Electric Permits 17 33 22 - 38 Plbg. & Hts . Permits 10 27 15 27 Razing Permits Residential - - - - Commercial - - - - Total dwelling units in City after completion of all construction permitted to date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 ,741 Cora Hullander Bldg. Dept. Secretary J CITY OF SHAKOPEE BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IN FEBRUARY, 1985 6564 Bill Morgan 230 Lewis Alt. $ 350 6565 Cancelled 6566 Cancelled 6567 Laurent Bldrs . 1932 Davis Court House House 67 ,900 � -3O .d z �� `� 6568 Charles Pass 126 N. Atwood Demo. 100 6569 Michael MenkeAP 11,17 Pierc _Aoc House 82 ,000 6570 J.L. Shiely 6896 Hwy 101 Stg. Bldg. 85 ,000 6571 James Hauer 418 E. 2nd Demo. 100 6572 Shak. Asmbly. Church 1205 E. 10th Alt . 300 6573 Kraus-Anderson Racetrack Addn. 520,557 6574 fames Hauer 418 E. 2nd Move-in 45 ,600 House �7' $801 ,907 ice' BASEBALL LIGHTING COMMITTEE MEETING -/ March 4, 1985 ` The meeting was called to order at 6: 15 p.m. by Chairman Joe Schleper in .the Shakopee Community Services Meeting Room. Members Present: Jim O'Neill, John Goihl , Bob Techam, Kevin O'Brien, Bill Schleper, Joe Schleper and George Muenchow. Others Present: Steve O'Neill & Joe Schleper, Jr. Chairman Schleper reviewed action taken since last meeting. The seats have been picked up and are presently stored in the Shakopee Public Works outside storage enclosure. Concrete planking (approximately 20 slabs) have been hauled to Tahpah Park. There are approximately 530 seats. The loose parts are yet to be picked up. Financial arrangements are: a. $3,000.00 was paid at time of delivery b. $3,000.00 to be paid May 1 C. $3,000.00 to be paid July 1 Several fund raising ideas were discussed. A Baseball Bingo Night at Little Six Bingo Palace was suggested by Ray Siebenaler. It was thought that this would be an excellent contingency venture. It was agreed that sale of individual seats was the best initial approach with seats probably selling for $50 a piece. It was agreed that chairpersons are needed immediately. The following ideas were looked upon with favor: a. Ask Jim Stillman and Ray Siebenaler to serve as Co-Chairpersons. b. Suggested the following to be considered as Committee Members: Bert Notermann, Dennis Hron, Jim O'Neill, Bill Klein, Bob Techam, John Goihl, Tim Riffe, Kevin O'Brien, Steve O'Neill, Don Clemens, Joe Schleper, Jr, Pat Pass Lavonne Schmidt, Arlo Lee. C. Levels of giving were suggested such as 1-5, 6-19, and 20 and above. Each level would be given a memento like a plaque or paper weight. d. For every seat purchased they would receive a ticket for a cash drawing. (Prize roughly $500 or more. ) A picture of the proposed stand would be provided. e. Purchasers of seats would immediately receive a pass for all home regular season games in 1985. f. A night in early June should be determined for the kickoff and drawing. The meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. The next meeting will be Monday evening, March 18, at 6:00 p.m. at the Community Services Office. The pu.z.pose being to hear plans for the fund raiser from the sub committee. Respectfully submitted, George F: Muenchow, Secretary PROCEEDINGS OF THE DOWNTOWN AD HOC COMMITTEE SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA February 27, 1985 Chairman Laurent called the meeting to order at 7 : 35 A.M. with the following voting members present : Steve Clay, Terry Link , Bill Wermerskirchen Jr . , Dan Steil , Don Martin , Jim Stillman and Terry Forbord . Absent : Jerry Wampach, Mike Sortum , Joe Topic and Dick Stoks . Also present : Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director, John K. Anderson, City Administrator and Bo Spurrier, City Engineer. Stillman/Steil moved to approve the minutes of February 13 , 1985 as presented. Motion carried. Mrs . Lebens was present and questioned the number of voting members on the Downtown Committee. She was advised by Dan Steil that the committee consisted of eleven voting members. (Note: There are actually twelve voting members , but as of this date , one member has never attended . ) Mrs . Lebens suggested that a roll call vote be taken when any recommendation for expenditure of money is made to Council . She also added that Claude Sinnen was interested in the committee and should be asked to join. Pete Sames and his sister, Jean Rademacher were present to observe the meeting . Chairman Laurent recognized his reappointment as the Chairman and offered to step aside if any member would be interested in participating in the chairman position. Terry Link arrived at 7 : 48 A.M. Steve Clay presented suggestions optimizing time use by the committee during meetings. Discussion followed. Clay/Forbord moved to incorporate as policy the following procedures to optimize time use by the committee ; 1 ) to have the first item on the agenda to approve the agenda for the present meeting , 2) to take a roll call vote when a recommendation to council is made for the expenditure of money and 3) resolve that comment and discussion by persons not on the committee, or city staff , or persons not scheduled to speak on the agenda to a specific issue be limited to 5 minutes per person/per agenda item. More lengthy discussion would require a motion from the committee . Motion carried . Page two Downtown Minutes 2/27/85 The Community Development Director reviewed her memo on consultant selection , bridge/junction design implementation , which addressed concerns mentioned by Mel Letens at a previous meeting to clarify certain issues. A series of activities that occurred over approx- imately a one year period , to provide MnDOT/Shakopee interaction to advance the proposed bridge/ junction improvements were summarized . Barton-Aschman is willing to submit a revised proposal for services. Positive references on Mr. Anderson have been provided and -it-- appears likely the T. H. 101 By-pass and bridge/junction improvements could be completed at approximately the same time with an ambitious time schedule. John Mullan and Ken Anderson from Barton-Aschman and Gregg Felt and Carl Hofsted represents'-Iives from MnDOT responded to the concerns addressed to them. Discussion followed with the Downtown Committee reviewing and reaffirming their previous recommendation that further proposed solutions for the Downtown/Junction Improvements would best be prepared by a consultant and that Barton-Aschman would be the best selection due to the continuity provided through Ken Anderson ' s involvement. Discussion of other options considered were: 1) Committee suggesting options to MnDOT without the benefit of engineering support ; 2) requesting the City Engineer to assist in the process ; 3) undertaking a new RFP to solicit consulting services ; 4) asking MnDOT to prepare the options (they declined ) ; 5) waiting until the City has completed its selection process for transportation consulting services ; 6 ) waiting until federal confirmation of project eligibility has occured . Don Martin suggested addre:sing the City Council as to what degree of involvement the Council wants to have in the design selection process. Forbord/Wermerskirchen moved that the Downtown Ad Hoc Committee recommend to the City Council that they go ahead and hire the consulting firm of Barton-Aschman and proceed with conceptual geometric design of the T. H. 169/101 junction/bridge improvements. Motion carried. Roll Call : Ayes: Clay , Werinerskirchen , Laurent , Steil , Martin , Stillman and Forbord . Noes : Link Page three Downtown Minutes 2/27/85 John Mullan of Barton Aschman indicated he will submit a letter offering consulting services for the T. H. 169/101 junction/bridge improvements at a fee not to exceed $81000 for the City Council consideration. Forbord/Link moved to approve the Downtown Design Standards as presented by Judi Simac , the City Planner. Motion carried. Community Development Director asked the committee for suggestions on how they would like to review the Downtown Bridge and Highway Options . It was suggested that the Downtown Committee would meet next week March 6th to discuss these options. Ken Anderson offered to attend the meeting and suggested that at the meeting or prior to it , the members review the Goals and Objectives previously determined by the committee. The Community Development Director suggested to study the maps and options ahead and individually decide what the advantages and disadvantages of each were. Mrs . Lebens suggested putting a price tag on each option and try to solve the most problems at the least expenditure of money. Carl Hofsted suggested that MnDOT has grouped all the proposals into three basic groups : 1 ) alternatives Aa , Bb , Cc , Dd & Ee , as the conceptional routing of the traffic options , generally some traffic on 1st Ave. or diverting it to a one-way on Levee Dr. , 2) Hh, Gg , Ff & Ii , which are basically routes which move thru traffic off First Avenue and 3) Jj a category by itself. Chrm. Laurent thanked the representatives from MnDOT and Barton- Aschman for attending the meeting. Link/Stillman moved to adjourn at 9 : 21 A.M. Motion carried . Toni Warhol Recording Secretary E ti Minnesota RECEIVED Grocers Association � � 555 Wabasha Street • Suite 215 • St.Paul,MN. 55102 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Phone:(612) 228-0973 • MN Toll Free 1-800-652-9030 JOEL R. HOILAND President March 11, 1985 Dear Council President: There are a lot of things that contribute to the quality of life that one finds living in a Minnesota community such as yours. One of those things is the convenience with which local citizens can obtain the everyday necessities of life. That's the proud role that the members of our Minnesota Grocers Association play in your town. They are the business people who have made an investment of resources and personal commitment to ensure that your citizens have immediate access to the widest possible choices of food and grocery products. We believe that the local food store is truly a vital part of the fabric that makes up community life. Unfortunately, your local grocer is currently under attack. That attack is taking place at the State Capitol and in many of the city council chambers around the state. This barrage has been launched by the liquor retailers lobby in opposition to our efforts to obtain passage of a bill permitting the sale of wine in food stores. As in any disputed question of public policy, there is a certain amount of merit to both sides of this question. What is unfair is for public officials, and public bodies, to take a position on this question without having heard both sides. I am writing to ask that you and your colleagues on the city council with- hold taking sides on this very important legislative matter until you've had the opportunity to hear the arguments of the grocers as well as those of the liquor retailers. To give you a perspective on this piece of pending legisla- tion from the point-of-view of your local food store operator, I have enclosed a briefing sheet on the bill. Thank you for your kind consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Joel R, oila d res de t Enclosure Publishers of the MINNESOTA FOOD GUIDE Issue Paper 2-85 1f WINE IN GROCERY STORES I . OVERVIEW - This bill enables cities in their sound discretion to issue special off-sale wine licenses to general food stores. II . LOCAL OPTION - No city will be required to permit the sale of wine in grocery stores; the power is delegated to local governments applying the particular community' s standards. III . CONSUMER PREFERENCE - Wine and food go together, and one-stop shopping is a convenience for shoppers . A statewide survey of shoppers at 67 food stores showed that 74% said "yes" to the question: "Would you favor a revision of Minnesota law to allow grocery stores to sell wine? " Two Minnesota polls indicate citizen approval of the sale of wine in food stores. IV. FAIR COMPETITION - Greater availability of wine leads to an increase in wine knowledge and interest by consumers, resulting in higher volume wine sales at all outlets, often at more attractive prices. The bill also permits liquor stores to sell food and grocery items. V. LICENSING AND ENFORCEMENT - Licensees will buy directly from a licensed wholesaler and sell directly to the consumer . Licenses will be granted by local governments . Enforcement will be the same as for beer sales. The days and hours for sale are the same as those permitted for intoxicating liquor . VI . OTHER STATES - Thirty-eight (38) states permit the sale of wine by food stores. Their experiences reveal these facts : - there was no evidence of increased alcohol abuse; - lower per capita alcohol-related arrest rates in states with permitted sales vs. prohibited sales . - state revenue increased significantly. VII . HEALTH CONCERNS - There is no evidence that abusive drinking or drunk driving occurs as a result of wine in grocery stores . To the contrary, solid evidence exists that wine sold in food stores promotes responsible consumption. VIII . CHEESE SALES - When wine and cheese have been merchandised together , cheese sales have doubled and sometimes tripled. Minneapolis Star and Tribune Established 1867 Roger Parkinson Publisher and President Joel R. Kramer Executive Editor Tim J. McGuire Managing Editor Robert J. White Editorial Editor 8A Monday, January 28, 1985 A loaf of bread, a jug of supermarket wine Under current state law, Minnesotans must make sales increase! as a result, with consumers general- two stops to purchase bread and wine. Grocery ly buying lower-cost table wines in grocery stores stores cannot sell wine; liquor stores cannot sell and turning to liquor stores for more varieties and bread. The Minnesota Grocers Association says better-quality wines. The prohibition on liquor- such restrictions are outdated, anticompetitive and store food sales is equally unnecessary and should anticonsumer,and wants them changed.We agree. be eliminated; many liquor stores already sell snacks. And grocery stores observe restrictions on At first glance, laws aimed at keeping liquor sales selling 3.2 percent beer and cigarettes to young in liquor stores may appear to serve the public people. well-being by discouraging alcohol abuse. However, such Prohibitionism contributes instead to protec- The most valid concern is whether selling wine in tionism for the liquor industry. It comes at the grocery stores would encourage alcohol abuse. The expense of consumer pocketbooks and conven- opposite seems more likely. People buying wine in ience, both of which would benefit if grocery stores a grocery store generally plan to use it in food sold wine. A wholesome association of wine with preparation or to serve with meals. Also, the gro- food would diminish the attraction of drink as a cers' proposal, would leave the final decision up to drug. cities; communities strongly opposed to wine in grocery stores could maintain the prohibition. 1.9quor-industry spokesmen argue that retail liquor stores already are hard-pressed because people are Similar legislation has died at the hands of the drinking less hard liquor, such as whiskey, and liquor-industry lobby three times in the past 10 could be driven out of business if grocery stores years.This time the bill should have dairy farmers, compete for wine sales. They point oul: that liquor state tax collectors and oenophiles on its side. stores cannot legally sell food, and question wheth- Studies show that cheese sales flourish in the com- ef grocery stores could prevent minors from buy- pany of wine sales, state liquor-tax revenues go up itig wine. and the nurnher of wine labels available in a market grows with increased consumer demand The grocers counter that studies from the 38 states and sophistication. The Legislature should approve that allow wine in grocery stores show that wine the bread-and-wine bill. 1 -112- PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 17, 1985 Chairman Dunwell called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. with members Spiotta and Ziegler present. Barry Stock, Administrative Intern, was also present. Commissioners Schwingler and Weeks were absent. Spiotta/Ziegler moved to approve the minutes of the December 20, 1984, meeting. Motion carried unanimously. SELECTION OF RECYCLING TARGET AREAS Mr. Stock explained that one of the objectives of the initial demonstration project of the recycling program is to reach 400 total households which are to be spread out over three target areas in order to evaluate the effect - bins, bags, and no storage mechanism has on the recycling tendencies of the participants. He added that paper, glass, and aluminum will be recycled, and these items would be sorted and separately stored by the residents in the target areas. In Mr. Stock's January 10, 1985, "Target Area Selection" memorandum to the Energy and Transportation Committee, he included a map identifying several areas which would meet target area qualifications. Staff recommended that area 1 receive 3 storage bags per household, area 3 receive 3 storage bins per household, and area 6 receive no storage mechanism. Barry Stock noted that the second Saturday in May is targeted for start up. The Boy Scouts will be collecting the paper; the Cub Scouts will be collecting the glass; the Catholic Church will be collecting the aluminum. All proceeds will go to the collecting organization. The Committee also felt a drop off point should be established so people could bring their recyclables in the event their pick-up was missed, etc. Barry Stock will work to establish a common drop off point with each organization. Mr. Stock added that he will ask the Boy Scouts to deliver the bins, the Cub Scouts to deliver the bags, and the Catholic Church to deliver the surveys. Ziegler/Spiotta moved to recommend to City Council that areas 1 , 3, and 6 be chosen as the target areas for the recycling program. Motion carried unanimously. RECYCLING SURVEY In accordance with the Community Energy Council Grant application work plan, staff developed a survey to measure the recycling tendencies in each of the three target areas. Mr. Stock explained that information gathered from the survey will be used to determine how much participation to expect, to measure if marketing efforts had any effect on participation, and to decide which areas would be served most effectively by bins, bags, or no storage mechanism. The Committee asked that the surveys be coded areas A, B, and C before they are distributed. They also felt a self-addressed, stamped envelope should be included to ensure a better response. Energy and Transportation Commission January 17, 1985 Page 2 Ziegler/Spiotta moved to accept and distribute to the target areas the cover letter and recycling survey as presented by staff. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stock presented a draft of the Energy and Transportation Committee Annual Report to be submitted to the City Council. The report highlighted the transit and energy related activities and actions of the Committee in 1984. Barry Stock noted he would also include the final ridership reports from the Van Pool and Dial-A-Ride programs. Ziegler/Spiotta moved to accept the cover letter and Annual Report draft including the final ridership reports from Van Pool and Dial-A-Ride programs as submitted to the Committee by staff and forward to City Council for approval. Motion carried unanimously. Barry Stock recalled that at the last meeting the question arose as to whether or not the Dial-A-Ride vehicles could be used for transporting students to and from school. In that connection, he submitted a letter which was sent to Van Pool Services Inc. by Minnesota Department of Transportation Project Manager, Ray Olson. Mr. Olson stated that the Dial-A-Ride Public Transit System is designed to serve the general public within the city limits without regard to trip purpose, point of origin, or destination within the boundaries of the City. Therefore, Dial-A-Ride vehicles can be used for transporting students to and from school. The Committee reviewed Transit monthly reports. Mr. Stock commented that the race track people used the back-up vehicle one day to transport some of the legislators out to the track. Commissioner Spiotta asked if staff had received any comments on the Dial-A-Ride fare reductions. Barry Stock said more people are calling the day they want to ride. He added that on February 13 and 14 the Valley Mall will pay people's fare to and from the mall as a promotional. The Committee discussed several other promotional ideas. Mr. Stock presented the bags and bins to be used in the recycling program. The Committee was very pleased with the selections he had made. The Recycling Brochure will be ready for the next meeting. Barry Stock presented his idea for the Recycling Logo: Shakopee Community Recycling and Abatement Program (SCRAP). Commissioner Spiotta suggested that three arrows be used to signify the three areas of recycling, and the bin colors (green, dark green, and yellow) could be used. The Committee discussed a problem in getting a van pool driver to submit reports on a timely basis. Mr. Stock will monitor the situation and develop a policy for the Committee's approval if it continues to be a problem. Ziegler/Spiotta moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:42 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. The next meeting will be held on February 21 , 1985. Barry Stock Judy Hughes Administrative Intern Recording Secretary Transit/Recycling Coordinator Joh PROCEEDINGS OF AN INFORMATIONAL MEETING OF THE SHAKOPEE ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 21 , 1985 Chairman Dunwell called an informational meeting of the Shakopee Energy and Transporation Committee to order at 7:30 p.m. with member Schwingler present. Barry Stock, Administrative Intern, was also present. Because Commissioners Spiotta, Weeks, and Ziegler were absent there was not a quorum to hold a Regular Session. Mr. Stock introduced two new members who will join the Committee, Mr. Don McNeil and Mr. Loren Sorenson. He added that Mr. Eugene Alen will also be a new member but he was unable to attend. Chairman Dunwell welcomed the new members to the Committee. Approval of the minutes from the January 17, 1985, meeting will be continued to the March meeting. Barry Stock presented several informational items for discussion. First, a sample recycling brochure was distributed for review. Mr. Stock indicated the final brochure will be mailed to all Shakopee residents with their utility billing. He added that he will be soliciting a block coordinator for each block in the City to remind their neighbors of Recycling Day. The final brochure design will be presented at the March meeting. Second, an updated recycling logo was introduced. Mr. Stock reviewed the background of the recycling project for the new Commissioners. Third, the Commissioners received the Community Energy Council Grant Monthly Reports for the months of December and January. Mr. Stock noted that these reports are a part of the grant requirement. Fourth, the January transit reports for .Dial-A-Ride and the Van Pools were reviewed. Mr. Stock pointed out the dramatic increase in ridership in the Dial-A-Ride program. Discussion followed as to whether Dial-A-Ride should be expanded to also run on Saturdays. Mr. Stock indicated that several interesting opportunities have come up in connection with the transit programs. First, there is the problem of-how to transport people from the metropolitan area out to the race track. A meeting will be held with MnDot and other area transit officials in the near future. The concensus was that it should not be the City's responsibility to provide this transportation. The second issue in this connection is how to service the employees of the race track in transporting them to and from work. Mr. Stock suggested that a reverse van pool program could be developed. Energy and Transporation Commission February 21 , 198: Page 2 Chairman Dunwell suggested that the Van Pool riders should pay as they ride rather than a flat by the month rate. Perhaps a punch card could be developed similar to the MTC's. Discussion ensued. The Commissioners agreed that any change should be implemented soon because in the summer ridership falls off. They felt that a pay as you ride rate would be a great incentive and increase ridership. Mr. Stock will investigate various alternatives in this regard and report back to the Commission at the March meeting. Mr. Stock noted that he has discovered Medicaid will pay the transportation costs for patients travelling to and from a medical appointment. He is working to utilize the Dial-A-Ride vans for Sr. Citizens in this regard. Finally, Mr. Stock presented background and an update on the Shakopee, Chanhassen, Chaska, Eden Prairie Transit Feasibility Study. He added that on February 27, 1985, four consultants will be interviewed and then a final selection will be made. Mr. Stock will keep the Commission updated on the progress of the study. Chairman Dunwell noted the next meeting of the Energy and Transportation Commission will be held on March 21 , 1985, at 7:30 p.m. The meeting was adjourned at 8:26 p.m. Barry Stock Judy Hughes Administrative Intern Recording Secretary Transit/Recycling Coordinator TENTATIVE AGENDA Energy and Transportation Committee Shakopee, Minnesota March 21, 1985 Chrm. Dunwell presiding : 1 . Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of Minutes - January 17 , 1985 & February 21 , 1985 . 3 . Election of New Committee Officers : A. Chairperson B. Vice-Chairperson C. Secretary 4 . ACTION ITEMS : A. Recycling Marketing Strategy B. Van Pool Ridership Survey C. Van Pool Fare Policy & Budget Restrictions D. Dial-A-Ride Punch Cards E. Transit Brochure 5 . INFORMATIONAL ITEMS : A. Recycling Survey Results B. Recycling Monthly Report - February C. Dial-A-Ride Monthly Report - February D. Van Pool Monthly Report - February 6 . Other Business A. B. 7 . Adjournment Barry A. Stock Admin. Intern CITY OF SHAKOPEE MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in regular session on February 4, 1985 at 4:30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room. Commissioner Kirchmeier offered a prayer for divine guidance in the deliberations of the Commission. MEMBERS PRES ITT: Commissioners Kirchmeier, Cook and Gorman. Also Manager Van Hout, Superintendent Leaveck, Liaison Wampach and Secretary Menden. Motion by Cook, seconded by Gorman that the minutes of the January 7, 1985 be approved as kept. Motion carried. BILLS READ: City of Shakopee 20,032.00 A T and T Information Systems 17.83 A T and T Information Systems 69.69 Bill Anderson, Software Consultants 200.00 Auto Central Supply Co. 37.10 Battery Tire and Warehouse 40.25 Border States Electric Supply Co. 62.85 Bro-Tex, Inc. 82.70 Carlson's OK Hardware 36.40 City of Shakopee 130.00 Clay's Printing Service 91.95 Clutch and U Joint, Inc. 171.45 Dressen Oil Co. 78.00 Electronic Center, Inc. 20.19 Feed Rite Controls, Inc. 562.59 General Electric Supply Co. 1,347.64 Graybar Electric Co. , Inc. 800.48 H & C Electric Supply Co. 1,003.00 International Business Machines 174.00 K K Design 4,518.00 Leef Bros. , Inc. 27.00 Robert S Means Co. , Inc. 40.75 I Ken Menden 9.50 Minnesota Municipal Utilities Assoc. 4,215.30 Motor Parts Service of Shakopee 24.25 Northern States Power Co. 1,713.83 Northern States Power Co. 307.28 Northern States Power Co. 248,358.49 North Star Waterworks Products 119.78 Northland Electric Supply Co. 958.50 Pitney Bowes 109.50 Ricks Auto And Radiator Repair 40.00 Reynolds Welding Supply Co. 12.80 Serco 48.00 Shakopee Ford 119.30 Shakopee Public Utilities Comm. 115.17 Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 25.00 Shakopee Services 22.00 Sireks Hydraulic Service, Inc. 111.40 Starks Cleaning Services 17.3h Suel Business Equipment 48.88 Total Tool Supply, Inc. 30.50 Truck Utilities and Mfg Co. 85.82 Valley Propane , Inc. 17.61 Louis Van Hout 95.00 W.F.L. Interprises, LTD. 178.96 Westinghouse Electric Supply Co: 2,684.47 Westburne Supply, Inc. 78.86 Water Products Co. 932.15 Motion by Cook, seconded by Gorman that the bills be allowed and ordered paid. Motion carried. A communication from Mr and Mrs. Pat O'Reilly concerning a fire hydrant on their property which they feel is too high out of the ground. Manager Van Hout is looking into the problem. Liaison Wampach gave a report of the progress of the Down Town Ad Hoc Committee. The committee will be making recommendations to the Council to hire an engineer to help with the design of the downtown area revitalization. Manager Van Hout presented to the Commission arepott on the wells. A discussion followed. Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Gorman that the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission authorize its Manager to initiate the development of Well #4. Motion carried. Manager Van Hout informed the Commission that the City Treasurer would be making recommendations to the Council for the hiring of an insurance consultant. Motion by Gorman, seconded by Cook to concur with the recommendations of the City Treasurer for the hiring of an insurance consultant at a cost of $1,100.00 to the Shakopee Public Utilities. Motion carried . Motion by Cook, seconded by Gorman to offer Resolution #284, A Resolution to Repeal Resolution #260, and adopt new personnel policies for the employees of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. Ayes: Commissioners Cook, Gorman and Kirchmeier. Nayes: none. Motion carried. Resolution passed. There were no new plats for January, 1985 There were 3 fire calls for a total of 1 hour and 40 minutes for the month of February, 1985. There were no lost time accidents for February, 1985. Motion by Gorman, seconded by Cook that the meeting be adjourned. Motion carried. The next regular meeting will be held on March 4, 1985 in the Utilities meeting room. Ba'rb�ra Mende n—I-ecre-ary 2-26-85 [REVISOR J JCR/LY 85-1665 4 1985 P A f 1 1 A bill for an act 2 relating to taxation; property; clarifying the 3 definition of real property; amending Minnesota 4 Statutes 1984, section 272 . 03, subdivision 1 . 5 6 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 7 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 272 . 03 , 8 subdivision 1, is amended to read: 9 Subdivision 1 . [REAL PROPERTY. ] (a) For the purposes of 10 taxation, "real property" includes the land itself, rails, ties, 11 and other track materials annexed to the land, and all 12 buildings, structures, and improvements or other fixtures on it, 13 bridges of bridge companies, and all rights and privileges 14 belonging or appertaining to the land, and all mines, minerals, 15 quarries, fossils, and trees on or under it. 16 (b) A building or structure shall include the building or 17 structure itself, together with all improvements or fixtures 18 annexed to the building or structure, which are integrated with 19 and of permanent benefit to the building or structure, 20 regardless of the present use of the building, and which cannot 21 be removed without substantial damage to itself or to the 22 building or structure . 23 (c) (i ) The term real property shall not include tools, 24 implements, machinery, and equipment attached to or installed in 25 real property for use in the business or production activity 1 2-26-85 [REVISOR ] JCR/LX 85-1665 1 conducted thereon, regardless of size, weight or method of 2 attachment. 3 ( ii ) The exclusion provided in elapse paragraph (c ) ( i ) 4 shall not apply to machinery and equipment includable as real 5 estate by clauses ( a) and (b) even though such machinery and 6 equipment is used in the business or production activity 7 conducted on the real property if and to the extent such 8 business or production activity consists of furnishing services 9 or products to other buildings or structures which are subject 10 to taxation under this chapter. 11 (iii ) The exclusion provided in paragraph (c ) ( i ) does not ---------------------------------------------------------- 12 apply to the exterior shell of a structure which constitutes ------------------------------------------------------------ 13 walls, ceilings, roofs, or floors if the shell of the structure --------------------------------------------------------------- 14 has structural, insulation, or temperature control functions or --------------------------------------------------------------- 15 provides protection from the elements. Such an exterior shell -------------------------------------------------------------- 16 is included in the definition of real property even if it also -------------------------------------------------------------- 17 has special functions distinct from that of a building. ------------------------------------------------------- 18 Sec . 2 . [EFFECTIVE DATE. ] 19 Section 1 is effective for taxes levied in 1985 and --------------------------------------------------- 20 thereafter, payable in 1986 and thereafter. ------------------------------------------- 2 8� �'�1Ii�U�1PP (�IIIIIIIIIII1if�1 �PI'UttPB 129 Levee Drive Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone 445-2742 Community Education • Parks • Recreation • Adult Education George F. Muenchow, Dir. 3/13/85 Judy Cox: I indicated to you that there is a gentleman planning to provide tours on the .ri_ve:r this summer. We need to be thinking of what is required in the way of permits, insurance, stipulations etc now so that he can be in business when suxu;er rolls around. Please give this some thought, and let's g�.,t together. C.C . : Jeanno Andre G.F.Tv1. y TOURS PAI? IF:, CREATIVE RIVER TOURS FISHING P.O.Box 151 SHAKOPEE.MN 55379 GROUP' RAPES (61 2) 445-7491 PICNICS GREG OR JOHN �a a Minnesota Valley Restoration of 1840 - 1890 -March 1„ 1985 2187 #12. Hwy. 101, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445-6900 Nr. John K. Anderson, City Administrator MAR 15 1985 City of Shakopee, Minn. CITY OF S Dear John: We do appreciate your efforts to assist Murphy's Landing, and although state law )rohibits your helping us with our financial recordings and. operations , the thoughtfulness of your gesture is greatly appreciated. As it is turning out, I am getting a good handle on the bookkeeping procedures thru some help from Jim {eeks at Citizen's State Bank, and an out- -line of accounting practices from ;Minnesota Historical Society who . se operations certainly parallel ours . While we are sim- plifying -procedures , it turns out that we will have to spend less time on this operation, but conversely, the results will more helpful than the more cumbersome system of old. The street cleaning crew has been faithful in clearing some of our roads here after a couple recent snowstorms. . . that is greatly appreciated, and a big help to our maintenance staff. We are looking forward to a great season, tour reservations are rolling in ahead of last year, we hope to top the 62o gain in attendance we racked up last season. Our print shop and blacksmith shops will be opening, and we are using our col- lective imaginations to find items which can be made at both which the public will gobble up, with some welcome revenue from the two new additions to our program. Shakopee is an exciting Place to be, and I am pleased to be a part of this growth _period. Sincerely, " ;canis Obst, Director i !t! :N� U'j&]PHTSJ J AINTIDJc.A. G a Minnesota Valley Restoration of 1040 - 1090 . I 2187 412. Hwy. 101, Shakopee, Minnes ta5 6900 5379 i 1935 SEASOTd r , May 1 thru May 31: Wed. thru Fri. , 9:00 - 4:00 S RIND y Sat. & Sun. 12:00 - 5:00 (except 24,25,26 Ea le Creels Rendes. then open :10:00 - 5:00 SUP.P•ZER June, July, Aug. : Wed. thru Fri. i0:00 - 4:00 Sat. and Suri. ,-. 12:00 5c00 - FALL Sept. , Oct. Wed. thru Fri. , 10:00 - 400 Sat. & Sun. , 12:00 - 4:00 WINTER December Wed. thru Fri. , 10:00 - 4:00 Sat. & Sun. , 12 c 00 - 400 " 1 SPECIAL PROGRAMS May 11., 5, 11, 12 SPRING PLANTING msy - 25 26 EAGLE CREEK RENDEZVOUS ' June 8 ANTIQUE TOOL DEMONSTRATIONS $ June 8, 9 HORSE-DRAWN CULTIVATION June 1 FIRE MUSTERk� 5AN OLD FASHIONED July 4 FOURTH u ust 1 18 CIVIL WAR ENCAMPMENT October 5 CANDLELIGHT EVENING October 26 , 27 THRESHING DEMONSTRATION , ,4kl ; r 7:,�rff„a3? t fl •: r..!.. Si��,:.ls;'i';.'T'i: TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ .REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA MARCH 19 , 1985 Mayor Reinke presiding 1] Roll Call at 7 :00 P.M. 2] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 3] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 41 Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterick are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. ) 51 Communications : AMM Nominations for Board of Directors 6] Public Hearings : None 71 Boards and Commissions: Planning Commission: a] Appeal by Les Koehnen of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals decision that he may not use property at 981 Bluff Ave. as a storage area for impounded vehicles *b] Preliminary Plat of Della' s 1st Add'n. , which lies East of 11th Avenue and Shakopee Avenue intersection in NW 1/4 of Sec . 16-115-22 ; developer, Cecil P. Clay *c] Final Plat of South Parkview 1st Add_'_n, which lies South of 12th Avenue and West of CR15 in the NE 1/4 of SE 1/4 of Seca 11-115-23 ; developer, Cletus J . Link -- Res . No. 2389 d] Ord. No. 162, Amending Shoreland Ordinance which removes certain waters from the Shoreland District e] Ord. No. 163 , Amending Zoning Map relating to floodplain f] `Joint Meeting with Planning Commission to discuss procedures for possible rezoning requests - discussion 8] Reports from Staff: a] Johnson-Reiland Construction Permit b] Appointment- to the Planning Commission *c] Overhead Door Bids - Public Works Building *d] Special Assessment Abatements *e] Tax Forfeit Parcels f] Industrial Development Bond Entitlement Issuers *g] Easement Agreement with Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Company for Shenandoah Drive crossing h] Holmes Street Basin Laterals Storm Sewer Assessment Policy - bring report of 2/29/85 and memo of 3/5/85 ( 9d, and 12q) i] Abating Assessment for 1976-1 Deans Lake Drainage- coming Mon. j ] Approve bills in amount of $ 166,783. 79 -1 J JO4u 4sTuTwPV f4TO uos,zapuV •x uuo f •ujno CpV [T T [P [O [q 0207 PTO JO MaN 4nou4TM JO g4TM - Su2TS aadoxPuS jo �4TO [P : ssauTsng .zau40 [OZ Ct9T • Sag 2uTPUTOSag PUP s4uawanoidwl OTTgnd JOJ uOT4PuwapuOO uO AOTTOd v 2uT4dopV `98SZ 'ON ' sag [u •uOW 2uTwoo 4jodaj - suOT4TPPV' POOMaT�'eg O4 s4uawanojdwl ,�PMpPoH UO 2uTJPGH 2uT44aS Puu 4jodag 2uTATaOag ` Z8CZ 'ON 'Sag [2 uOT4UAJGSG zd 4aa,z4S sTTudl jagwTZ uo 4jodag V fuijapio t8SZ ' ON 'sag [i asuaOTq 2uTTgwpo V joj A4aTOOS SW T . 4PN JO uOT4POTTddV 2uTmOTTPsTQ ` 88Sz 'ON 'sag [a sasuaOTq x3uTTqu o jo aousnssl uo wnijo4pioN V 'dUTWT'eTOOJd ` T9T '0N 'Pi0 [P uauuaox AT.zanag 04 uOT4PTOajddV `GLSz 'ON •sag [o swPTTTTM 4auPf 04 uOT4PTOaj ddV ` S8CZ *ON 'saH [q xuTq Aijaz 04 uoT4pTOajddy ` G8Sz *ON 'Sag [P : saOuPuTPJ O puP suoT4nTosag [6 -z- a�Pd S86T ` 6Z g0JPlq VGNaDV ZAIZFIINHI z7sr` .. .s� IVlAr\ S ` '1 �� � 1.i �.. � . c.• Family Amusement Park One Valleyfair Drive, Shakopee, MN 55379 (612) 445-7600 March 18, 1985 Mayor Eldon Reinke City of Shakopee 129 1st Ave. E. Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mayor Reinke, I have read in the Shakopee Valley News that the city is intending on constructing a waterslide for use at the city pool . As you are aware, Valleyfair has a waterslide presently in place and is planning on expanding these types of activities in future years. With this type of capital program by the city it will place Valleyfair and the city of Shakopee in direct competition with each other. Private enterprises cannot compete with government in these matters. In addition, while this type of investment looks relatively simple to operate and maintain, in truth they require a tremendous amount of maintenance work to keep the slides running efficiently and safely. A decision by the city council to go into the waterslide business could have negative effects on the growth of our water plans. Also, I recommend that the city thoroughly examine the costs and liability exposure to operate this type of attraction. In my opinion, a decision by the council to enter into this type of project would not be in the best interest of tourism for the city of Shakopee. If you should have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call me. S i ;L. /Richard Kinz Vice President/General Manager RLK:dw A xc: John Anderson B U L L :EOT I N association of metropolitan municipalities March 14 , 1985 TO: Member Cities FROM: Ver terson, Executive Director RE : Wanted: Nominations for AMM Board of Directors 1 . BOARD NOMINATIONS WANTED FOR NOMINATING COMMITTEE : A Nominating Committee , as required by the AMM By-Laws , was appointed by the Board of Directors at the March 7th. Board Meeting . Members of the Committee are : Chairperson, Jack Irving, Crystal Manager; Sharon Sayles Belton, Minneapolis Councilmember; June Demos , Roseville Mayor , Jerry Dulgar , Anoka Manager; Walt Fehst , Robbinsdale Manager; Lee Knutson, Rosemount Mayor ; Tom Spies, Bloomington Councilmember; Gloria Vierling , Shakopee Councilmember ; and John Walker , Newport Mayor . The offices of President , Vice-President , and nine directors are to be filled . Due to the two-term limitation and resignations, there will be a minimum of four to five new board members to be elected so please forward your recommendations/nominations. Your nominations, including a brief resume , should be sent to the AMM Office to the attention of Vern Peterson by no later than Monday, April 15th! 2 . AMM ANNUAL MEETING; THURSDAY EVENING, MAY 30 , 1985 : For your advance planning , the AMM Annual Meeting has been set for Thursday evening, May 30th. The location has not been selected as yet , but it will be a dinner meeting. A meeting notice with the specific meeting details will be mailed in early May but please reserve this date now. 3 . LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITIES : After a very slow start , the pace at the Legislative has picked up substantially. As indicated previously, since the AMM is a co-sponsor with the LMC of the Weekly Legislative Bulletin, we will not normally detail legislative bills in these AMM Bulletins but will keep you appraised of major legislative items that have more of a metropolitan focus. As such , there are several bills that will be "heard" in the -1 - 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-5600 next few weeks that have a common goal of making the Metropolitan Governance System more accountable. The following bills are supported by the AMM since we have long felt there was a need for more metropolitan level accountability. -HF 272 (Knickerbocker) See Leg. Bulletin No. 5 , dated SF 277 (D. Moe) February 8 , 1985 for bill description. These bills have been assigned to the Local and Urban Affairs Committees in both houses and will be "heard" shortly. -HF 571 (Ozment) See Leg. Bulletin No. 8 , dated (No Senate companion March 1 , 1985 for bill description as ye 4E, ) This bill was passed out of the Metropolitan Affairs Subcommittee of the House Local and Urban Affairs Committee on March 12th. and will be "heard" in full committee shortly. We expect this bill to have tough sledding in the Senate Gov. Ops. Committee. -HF 686 (Ozment) See Leg. Bulletin No. 9 , dated (No Senate companion March 8 , for bill description as yet ) 4 . AMENDMENTS TO SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT : Bills will be introduced shortly in both the House and Senate which will make major modifications to the Metropolitan Solid Waste Management system. Among the modifications will be a provision that will prohibit the disposal of unprocessed solid waste in landfills after 1990 . Another likely provision will be the requirement for mandatory source separation ordinances at the local level. The AMM has adopted a rather comprehensive policy relating to solid waste management and we do support the general concept that landfills should only be used as a last resort. However, we do have several the I'draft copies" o.L tlle3e U -LIS specific concerns with d: a_ which we have reviewed: A . Mandatory Source Separation Ordinances. B . Lack of funding to help cities start up recycling activities. C. Lack of a special levy provision for local costs . D. The 1990 prohibition date is probably unrealistic . We will monitor this legislation very carefully and seek amendments to alleviate these concerns. 5 . INDEPENDENT MANAGEMENT STUDY OF THE MWCC: We are pleased to note that the MWCC staff have already started the process to implement the recommendations contained in the report of the Management Study Consultant , Touche Ross and Company. You may have read , MWCC Chair , Pete -2- Meintsma , has personally endorsed the recommendations which are about 75 in number. We believe these recommendations will also be suppor�ed by the governing body of the MWCC. I believe that several of the major recommendations such as salary and benefi'. analysis, rate setting methodology and process , data proce;3sing, etc. , will require the further use of a consultant( s) and this is supported by the Independent Management Study Task Force. The Task Force feels that due to the sensitivity and complexity of some issues an outside consultant will add creditability to the process and eventhough it will cost more money in the short run; we believe it will be money well spent . The MWCC will be reviewing the implerientation plan on Tuesday afternoon, March 19th. at 2 :00 P .M. 6 . SEMINAR RESCHEDULED FOR "NEW APPROACHES TO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT : Attached is the program agenda and registration information for this Seminar which has been rescheduled for Friday, April 19th. The AMM is not involved in this Seminar but in view of the importance of the subject matter, we are pleased to forward this information to you. NOTE : This bulletin is being mailed to Mayors and Chief Administrative Officials only. I would appreciate it if you would share this information with your Councilmembers as well. -3- 7a, MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judi Simac, City Planner RE: Appeal of the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals by Les Koehnen DATE: March 15 , 1985 Background: At their February 7 , 1985 meeting, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals approved a motion to affirm the decision of the City Planner that the appellant, Les Koehnen, could not use the property at 981 Bluff Avenue as a storage area for impounded vehicles for the reason that the proposed use would be an intensification of a legal non-conforming use. Mr. Koehnen has appealed the decision to the City Council. Please find attached a copy of the case report, dated January 30 , 1985 , which was prepared for the Board of Adjustment and Appeals Public Hearing. Also included is the code language relating to non conforming uses. Requested Action: Offer Appeal Resolution of the City Council No. 388 , affirming the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals that said appellant may not use the property at 981 Bluff Avenue as a storage area for impounded vehicles . tw Memo To: Shakopee Planning Commission From: Judi Simac , City Planner Date: January 30, 1985 Appellant: Les Koehnen, Koehnen ' s Standard 804 E. 1st Avenue , Shakopee Location: 981 Bluff .Avenue , Lot 6 , Block 17 and adj . 60 x 110 ft . vacated Prairie St . , East Shakopee Zoning: R-3 Mid Density Residential Land Use: Legal Non-Conforming Auto Body Repair Shop Applicable Regulations : Section 11 . 04, Subd. 4; Section 11 .03 , Subd. 2 , A, D, H Findings Required: Section 11 .04, Subd. 4 Appeal : The appellant is appealing the decision of the City Planner that said appellant may not use the property at 981 Bluff Avenue as a storage area for impounded vehicles . Considerations : 1 . The auto body repair shop was constructed in 1953. An addition to the east side of the building was constructed in 1965 when the property was in an "open zone" . Sub- sequently the fenced-in storage area was created. 2 . In February 1981 the property owner was notified by the City Planner of the non-conforming status of the property and the conclusions of the Planning Commission that the river bluff north of Bluff Avenue should be reserved for the development of mid density residential units . Further, the expansion of existing businesses within that residen- tial zone conflicted with the land use plan. ( See attach- ment ) 3 . Presently the Shakopee Body Shop operates at the site. Customers park in front of the building. At the rear of the building is an accumulation of automobile parts and on the average four to five cars are parked within the fenced-in area. 4. The existing land uses include the river to the north, a residence to the east , vacant property zoned B-1 to the south and a vacant lot to the west . Further to the west is the Ornamental Iron Shop, also a non-conforming use . 5 . The appellant is seeking the City contract for towing. A requirement of the contract is to identify the site for storing the impounded vehicles and determine if the site complies with the zoning regulations . 6 . The City Planner has made the following interpretations of the non-conforming use section of the code : a. Although the code allows for a non-conforming use to be changed to a similar non-conforming use or more restrictive non-conforming use, it does not allow for an intensification of the use, which in this particular case would most likely result in more than five vehicles being stored at any one time. b. Normal maintenance and non-structural repairs may Shakopee Planning -ommission Les ''- ehnen, Appellant January 30 , 1985 Koehi._n' s Standard Page -2- be conducted for a legal non-conforming use , but none that extend or intensify the non-conforming use. 7 . The appellant has requested a determination that the storing of the impDunded vehicles would be a conforming use ( see attached letter) . The City Code does not allow for use variances . 8 . The appropriate zoning districts for the storage of automobiles is as a conditional use in the I-1 or permitted use in the I-2. Requested Action: Offer Appeal Resolution No. 388 affirming the decision of the City Planner that said appellant may not use the property at 981 Bluff Avenue as a storage area for impounded vehicles . JS : cah Attachments -Dn kvo?e.a,��ady Sc r HAK cE i rr Tr Cc JS Or W � - ©��.� 'is�J1 �1D� 'I�� �: � I" �>:1��UIJI I �►o IY Is �; IJ L? EW.jI a I_s ! I a s a lu tl I M CIO O lY' In � v ID AVL. I _� � � �✓� ��... TNOMC I I I I I >I: ; II ly Ii — OIL co � 2 Vl I � Ip IiNN I SHAKOPEE I1_I�c F i i o L E NES I/\i v i •I� I L - rte .AU Tool c e- 12 Tq—AVE. � r. 12 ' 1 avE. ; t,pR1HERN I G4S I Cop OANY —�— •��� — p LfiCi — I Or r A I u III m 13 � — C it 18 17 ICO RO 7E I � OGLEN '! - N NILLSIDE U i ESUTES SC 42 / I f I A 1 r� I i D. Structures within the public right-of-way are not covered by the provisions of this Chapter except as noted in this Subparagraph and the regulations in the sign provisions. . E. No garage , tent, trailer , unfinished struc- ture , or accessory building shall at any time be used as a dwel- ling unit Subd. 2. Non-Conforming Uses and Structures. A. Any structure or use lawfully existing upon the effective date of this Chapter may be continued at the size and in a manner of operation existing upon such date. B. Nothing in this Chapter shall prevent the placing of a deteriorated structure in safe condition when said structure is declared unsafe by the Building Inspector. C. When any lawful non-conforming use of any structure or land in any district has been changed to a conform- ing use, it shall not thereafter be changed to any non-conforming use. - D. A lawful non-conforming use of a structure or parcel of land may be changed to a similar non-conforming use or to a more restrictive non-conforming use. Once a structure or parcel of land has been placed in amore restrictive non-conform- ing use , it shall not return to a less restrictive non-conforming use. E. Whenever a lawful non-conforming structure shall have been damaged by fire, flood, explosion , earthquake, war , riot or act of God, it may be reconstructed and used as be- fore if it be reconstructed within twelve (12) months after such calamity, unless the damage to the building or structure is 50 percent or more of its fair market value , in which case the re- construction shall be in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter . - F. Whenever a lawful non-conforming use of a structure or land is discontinued for a period of six (6) months , any future use of said structure or land shall be in conformity with the provisions of this Chapter . G. Any structure or a use for which a structure is to be erected which will, under this Chapter , become non-con- forming but for which a building permit has been lawfully granted prior to the effective date of this Chapter or of amendments thereto, may be completed in accordance with the approved plans; provided construction is started within six (6) months of the ef- fective date of this Chapter or amendment thereof and continues to completion within two (2) years. Such structure or use shall thereafter be an approved non-conforming structure or use , or both. H. Normal maintenance of a building or other structure containing or related to a lawful non-conforming use is permitted, including necessary non-structural repairs and inci- dental alterations which do not extend or intensify the non-con- forming use. I . Alterations may be made to a building contain- ing lawful non-conforming residential units when they will im- prove the livability thereof , provided they will not increase the -275- number of dwelling units or bulk of the building . J. In all districts, existing uses which are per- mitted in this Chapter only by conditional use permit, and for which no permit has been issued, shall be a non-conforming use until such permit is issued. K. No -junk yard may continue as a non-conforming use for more than one (1) year after the effective date of this Chapter , except that it may continue as a conditional use in an Industrial or Agricul-:ural District if within that period it is completely enclosed wi-:hin a building or within a continuous solid fence, not less than 8 feet high so as to screen completely the operations of the junk yard. Plans of such building or fence shall be reviewed by the Council before it is erected. Source : Ordinance No. 31, 4th Series Effective Date : 10-25-75 Subd. 3 . Lot Provisions. unless the fol A. A platted lot of record shall not be developed lowing is provided: I. It has a frontage on a public right-of-way. can be met. 2. All setback requirements of this Chapter 3. I can ated str adequate sewage treatmentt systemb canebe�ninstalled ttotservee and permanent dwelling. such B. Unplatted lot of record shall not be developed unless the current code provisions are met. C. Except in the case of planned developments as provided for hereinafter , not more than one principal building shall be located on a lot. Source : Ordinance No. 106 , 4th Series Effective Date : 9-30-82 Subd. 4. Zoning Coordination. Any zoning district change on land adjacent to or across a public right-of-way from an adjoining community shall be referred to the Planning and the adjacent community for Commission, review and comment prior to action by the Council granting Dr denying the zoning district classifica- tion change. A period of at least thirty (30) days shall be pro- vided for receipt of comments; such comments shall be considered as advisory only. Subd. 5. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan. Any significant change in zoning granted by the Council shall automatically amend the Comprehensive Plan in accordance with said zoning change. Subd . 6 . Accessory Buildings. A. No accessory building or structure shall be -276- (11-1-82) ? �~ William Butler 8168 W. 125th Street Savage, MN 55378 February 7, 1984 Ms. Judi Simac, City Planner, and Board of Adjustemnts and Appeals City of Shakopee Shakopee, MN 55379 Ms. Simac and Commissioners, In May of 19825 I purchased a Four-Plex Apartment building on Bluff Street next to the Shakopee Body Shop. The investment looked to be a good one because the Body Shop next door was well maintained and the adjourning fenced lot was rarely used for storage except for occasional body parts used directly in the body shop business. For the last three years it has remained used at this level . I understand that presently a proposal exists to intensify the use of this storage area by allowing towing storage that is not related to this original body shop use. For a variety of reasons, I want to go on record as opposing this intensification of use on this site. My first reason to oppose intensifying the use is I feel it will devalue my property. Anything which looks worse than the present storage area cannot possibly enhance the value of my apartments. Storing multitudes of demolished cars, snow-birds, derelicts, boats and other impounded vehicles at a level substantially beyond what it hes been for actually the last four years, that I am aware of , has to be an intensification of use. Neither of the last two owners of the body shop has owned a tow truck or impounded cars at the level they would be under this new proposal . Besides devaluing my property, I do not believe the Shakopee City Code would allow this expansion. The property is a non- conforming use already. It cannot be expanded and in reality has been placed in a kind of a slow-death mode. When this area was changed from a Business Zone to a Mid-Density Residential Zone the handwriting was on the wall . This piece of property was intended to eventually phase out as a business use. Anyone purchasing such property has to understand that before purchase. It' s only good business. The past practices of the last two owners has set the more restrictive use of NO TOWED STORAGE on that lot. Section 11 . 03 Subdivision 3. b, states when a non- conforming use has been placed in a more restrictive use it shall not return to a less restrictive one. The precedent has been set. A Third factor besides devaluation and City code restrictions is that the storage lot ownership is in question. I received a release form to sign from Mr. Foucault' s attorney giving away my claim to the "vacated street " where the storage lot is located, being curious why such an event was required, I did some research and have concluded there is questionable title to this storage lot. There seems to be no record of the City of Shakopee ever vacating this street. It appears to me that it was fenced and sold some many years back, an interesting history considering no one has really had clear title to it. Frankly, I wouldn' t mind having half of this street for my apartment complex and am considering petitioning for the City to officially vacate it. I do beleive there are too many reasons against allowing this storage lot. My property devaluation, the City Code restrictions and a. questionable title leads me to believe there can be only one decision. The storage lot proposed for towed vehicles does not belong in this residential area. Thank you for your consiceration. Sincerely, 7 �- CITY OF SHAKOPEE APPEAL RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL N0. 388 WHEREAS, Les Koehnen' s Standard having first filed an appeal to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals dated 1/15/85 for an appeal from the strict application of the provisions , of the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance , Section 11 . 04 , Subd. 4 ; 11 . 03 . Subd. 2A,n,H to wit: Appealing the decision of the -City Planner t11at ca i r9 a� L i i " � Tnt- lice � -Property at 981 Bluff Ave a:� a ctnraga arca fnr imgcundcd�za ��les . WHEREAS , the property upon which the appeal is being made is described as: 981—,Bl -f -Ave . Lot 6 B o -k 17 and AHj _ An x l i o ft. -vacated Prairie ST. East Shakopee : and WHEREAS , said appeal is for property presently zoned as: R-3--Mid Density -Residential- - WHEREAS, Residential-WHEREAS, said appeal was denied by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals at their meeting of IMarch 7 . 1985 and this decision has been appealed to the City Council ; and WHEREAS , the Shakopee City Council on March 19 . 19RS held a public hearing on the appeal from the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. NOW THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that upon hearing the advice and recommendations fo the Board of Adjustments and Appeals and the Shakopee City Council that the aforementioned appeal be and hereby _ as follows: ....... . ._.... .. .. .__. . ...._...... ._.__._.._ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , that pursuant to Shakopee City Code 11. 04 -Subd . 4-F. All decisions of the City Council are final. Adopted in regular - session of the Shakopee City Council of the City of Shakopee , Minnesota , held this day of lg Mayor City of Shakopee 7b MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judi Simac , City Planner RE: Preliminary Plat Approval - Della ' s lst Addn. DATE: March 15 , 1985 Background: At the March 14 , 1985 meeting, the Planning Commission approved a motion to recommend to the City Council preliminary plat approval of Della ' s lst Addn. subject to conditions. Please refer to the attached case report, which provides detailed infor- mation on the plat, and the enclosed preliminary plat drawing. Action Requested: Motion to approve the preliminary plat of Della ' s lst Addn. subject to the following conditions : 1. Approval of a Title Opinion by the City Attorney. 2 . A variance is hereby granted from the requirement to provide twenty feet of screening where Austin Circle abuts Lots 16 , 17 , Block 5 , JEJ Addition for the reason that the variance shall not be detrimental to the public safety, health or welfare or injurious to other property in the neighborhood. 3 . Execution of a Developer ' s Agreement for the construction of the required improvements : a. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPUC Utilities Manager . b. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPUC Utilities Manager. C. Sanitary Sewer and Storm Water System to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the City Design Criteria and Standard Specifications. d. Streets and Street Signs shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the City Design Criteria and Standard Specifications . e. The developer shall agree to the City Engineer ' s method of apportioning the installments remaining unpaid against the plat and that the developer waives his right to appealing the apportionment. f . Outlot B shall be dedicated park land for use as a walk way. g. No building permit shall be issued for Outlot A until it is replatted. Page two Memo - Della ' s 1st Addn„ 4 . The developer shall dedicate an additional 17 feet of right- of-way where the plat abuts CSAH 16 . 5 . The developer shall provide all street signs . 6. The developer shall provide a recordable agreement stating that not more than cne lot shall be developed for a twin home. 7 . The City Engineer must receive and approve final plans and specifications for all public facilities, including but not limited to, roads , sanitary sewer system, storm sewer , drainage, grading, etc. 8 . Construction plans approved and filed with the City Engineer prior to recording the plat. 9 . No parking allowed on either side of Austin Circle. 10 . Retaining walls shall be used whre necessary to maintain the slope of the lot in conformance with slope requirements as defined by ordinance. Attachments tw MEMO TO: Shakopee Planning Commission FROM: Judi Simac , City Planner DATE: January 18 , 1985 ITEM: Application for Preliminary Plat Approval - Della ' s First Addition APPLICANT: Cecil P. Clay LOCATION: NW-4 of Sec. 8 - E. 11th and Shakopee Avenue Intersection ZONING: R-2 Urban Residential LAND USE: Undeveloped APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 12 , Subdivision Regulations FINDINGS REQUIRED: Section 12.03, Subd. 3 ; Section 12.04 Considerations : 1 . The total area of the plat is 3. 67 acres . 2. The existing zoning classification is R-2 Urban Residential which permits single and two family residences . The total proposed number of lots is six with two outlots . Lots 1 and 6 are developed with homes. The applicant is request- ing approval to build at least one twin home on either lot 2 or 5 . 3. The surrounding land uses are residential. 4. Although it meets the minimum lot size requirement , Outlot A should not be permitted to develop unless it is replatted. Outlot B, 2000- sq. ft. in size should be dedicated park land for use as a walkway between 11th Avenue and Park Ridge Drive. 5 . The Scott County Engineer recommends that in order to pro- vide for future CSAH 16 upgrading, an additional 17 feet of right-of-way should be dedicated as highway easement where the plat abuts CSAH 16 . This will ultimately provide a total of 50 feet of right-of-way where the plat abuts CSAH 16 . 6 . 10 foot utility and drainage easements are shown on the plat. 7 . The Police and Fire Chiefs have reviewed the plat and recommend approval . 8 . The Finance Dept. indicates a total of $6 ,295 . 86 remaining in assessments against the parcel . 9 . The City Engineer approves the proposed sanitary sewer and the drainage report. 10. The proposed Austin Circle is classified a marginal access street : 50 feet of R-O-W and 28 feet roadway. If approved, parking should be restricted to NO PARKING on either side of the street . 11 . The Subdivision Code does not permit double frontage or reverse frontage lots except where the lots back on an arterial street (which they don' t in this case) or because the topographic conditions render subdividing otherwise unreasonable. Double frontage lots must have an additional depth of at least 20 feet to allow for planting along the back lines . In the case of this plat , the double frontage lots are Prelim. Plat App' -al Della ' s First Addition January 18, 1984 Page -2- being created from lots previously platted. The Austin Circle R-O-W is abutting the rear property lines of the lots on Shakopee Avenue. (The minimum lot depth is 100 feet in the R-2 , and the affected lots are on average 130 feet in depth. ) The developer is not permitted to place any screening in the Austin Circle R-O-W, therefore Austin Circle should be moved to the northeast by twenty feet , to allow for a twenty foot screening area which should be maintained by the developer. Realigning Austin Circle will create a revision of the lots . The developer is requesting a variance from the require- ment to provide a 20 foot screening area along Austin Circle. He maintains that : 1 ) It is not practical to move the lots 20 ft. to the north because the slope would be too great, 2 ) The houses could be sited on the lots so that they would be 130 ft . from the houses in the JEJ Addn. , 3 ) He will place restrictions on the lots which requires that "no house shall be higher than a split level" . The findings required to recommend approval of the variance are as follows : A. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public safety, health or welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. B. The conditions upon which the request for a variation is based are unique to the property for which the variation is sought , and are not applicable, generally, to other property. C. Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Chapter would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of this Chapter. D. The special conditional and circumstances do not result from the actions cf the applicant. E. Because of the particular physical surroundings , shape , or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, a particular hardship to the owner would result , as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. 12 . Sect. 12 . 07 , Subd. 4, D, states that in any subdividing, due regard shall be shown for all natural features , such as tree growth, steep slopes , water course , etc. , and Mans adjusted to preserve those which will add attractive- ness , safety and stability to the proposed development . 13 . The City Engineer has reviewed and approved the Subsurface Soils Investigation (both initial and supplemental report ) which was requested to determine development suitability. Prelim. Plat Appr -al Della ' s First Ado-L-ion � January 18 , 1985 Page -3- Alternatives : Given the considerations of the proposed plat , staff suggests the following alternatives : I . Approve, with conditions , the submitted preliminary plat along with the granting of the requested 20 foot variance to construct Austin Circle. Pro: Saves the developer time and money. The code standard is not met in regard to the screening of the abutting properties , a request that the owners wanted to be addressed. II . Require the developer to submit a revised preliminary plat which relocates Austin Circle to meet code require- ments . Pro: The Planning Commission and staff can confirm that revisions are made and acceptable. Con: Additional costs and time for the developer. III . Approve the submitted preliminary plat, without a variance, with the condition that the developer will make the necessary revisions to Austin Circle in the Final Plat. Pro: Saves the developer time and money. Con: The developer may not incorporate the Planning Commission' s required revisions correctly and will be required. to do a new final . Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Alternative III . It is further recommended that . the Preliminary Plat of Della ' s First Addition be approved subject to the following conditions : 1 . Approval of a Title Opinion by the City Attorney. 2. The developer shall realign Austin Circle to the northeast twenty feet in order to create a twenty foot screening area to be maintained by the developer. 3 . Execution of a Developer ' s Agreement for the construction_ of the required improvements : a. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPDC -Utilities Manager.- b. anager:b. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPUC Utilities Manager. C. Sanitary Sewer and Storm Water System to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the City Design Criteria and Standard Specifications . d. Streets and street signs shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the City Design Criteria and Standard Specifications . E. The developer shall agree to the City Engineer' s method" Prelim. Plat App, al Della ' s First Addition January 18, 1985 Page -4- of apportioning the installments remaining unpaid against the plat and that the developer waives his right to appealing the apportionment . f• Outlot B shall be dedicated park land for use as a walkway. g• No building permit shall be issued for Outlot A until it is 1 4• The developer sha11dedicate an addit ' Of-way where the plat abuts CSAH 16 . tonal 17 feet of right- 5. The developer shall provide all street signs . 6 . The developer shall provide a recordable agreement statin that not more than 10% of the plat will be developed for g twin homes . 7 . The City Engineer must receive and approve finallan specifications for all public facilities , including butand limited to, roads , sanitary sewer system , drainage, grading, etc. , storm sewer 8 . Construction plans approved and filed with the City Engineer prior to recording the plat . 9 . No parking allowed on either side of Austin Circle. Requested Action: Motion to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat of First Addition with conditions , to the City Council . Delta ' s JS : cah 7c, MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator Lf �Y FROM: Judi Simac , City Planner RE: Final Plat Approval of South Parkview lst Addn. DATE: March 15 , 1985 Background: At their March 14 , 1985 meeting, the Planning Commission approved a motion to recommend to the City Council Final Plat approval of South Parkview lst Addition subject to the staff recommended conditions , items 1-14 , as contained in the Staff memo dated March 1, 1985 . (Please refer to attached memo and resolution) . Action Requested: Offer Resolution No. 2389 , A Resolution Approving the Final Plat of South Parkview lst Addition, and move for its adoption. Attachments tw RESOLUTION N0, 23819 A Resolution Approving the Final Plat of South Parkview 1st Addition WHEREAS , the Planting Commission of the City of Shakopee did approve the Final Plat of South Parkview 1st Addition on March 14 , 1985 and has recommended its adoption ; and WHEREAS , all notices of hearing have been duly sent and posted and all persons zppearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon ; and WHEREAS , the City Council has been fully advised in ail things. NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the Final Plat of South Parkview 1st Addition , described as follows : The Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 11 , Township 115 , Range 23 , Scott County, Minnesota , excepting therefrom: That part whereof contained in the plat of Jackson View Addn. , Scott County, Minnesota according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County and State ; be , and the same hereby is approved and adopted with the requirements that : 1 . Approval of a Title Opinion by the City Attorney . 2. Outlot E shall be dedicated ( park dedication ) for use as a retention basin. 3 . Execution of a :developers Agreement for the construction of the required improvements: a . A sidewa :.k to be constructed along the north side of 13th Avenue when Phases II and III are constructed , in accordance with the Design Criteria and Standard Specifications adopted by the City of Shakopee. b. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPUC Utilities Manager. C . Water sys-�em to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPDC Utilities Manager. d. Sanitary sewer and storm water system be installed in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer. e. Street improvements be made in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer . Phase I construction of roadways must end in temporary hammerhead turn-arounds which must be replaced with a temporary cul-de-sac if the balance of the road construction is not completed within one year. f. The developer shall agree to the City Engineer ' s method of apportioning the installments remaining unpaid against the plat and that the developer waives his right to appealing the apportionment. 4 . The City Engineer must receive and approve revised final plans and specifications for all public facilities including , but not limited to, roads , sanitary sewer system , storm sewer and the receipt of the overlot grading plan. 5 . Approval by the Planning Commission of a variance for Quincy Circle to exceed the maximum cul-de-sac length of 500 feet by 82 feet for the reason that a design change of 13th Avenue was required by the City and County Engineers which necessitated a change in the design of Quincy Circle. 6 . Outlots A, B, C and D comprise Phases II and III and must be replatted prior to any development. 7 . The developer shall provide all street signs. 8 . The developer shall submit to the County Engineer constuction plans for access to CSAH 15 and obtain a permit when Phases II and III are developed. 9 . Funding for the oversizing of 13th Avenue will be provided by the City of Shakopee. 10 . There shall be a one to ten ratio for duplex development as agreed to by the developer. 11. A planting easement will be provided on lots 1-9 , Block 1 , where these lots abut CR 15 . 12 . The developer must determine what portion of the lift station is attributed to other development. 13 . The developer shall grant to the City of Shakopee right of en,:.ry easements for hammerhead turnarounds for Outlots A , B, C; Lot 3 Block 3 and Lot 5 , Block 2 . 14 . Lots 3 and 41 , Block 3 and Lots 5 , 6 , 7 Block 2 shall be nonbuildable until Phase II facilities serving the lots are completed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , that the Mayor and City Clerk be and the same are hereby authorized and directed to execute said approved Plat and Developer ' s Agreement. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee , Minnesota , held this day of 19 Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form the ------.. day of 19 9 City Attorney z4 7 MEMO TO: Shakopee Planning Commission FROM: Judi Simac , City Planner DATE: March 1 , 1985 APPLICANT: - Cletus J. Link LOCATION: NE-14 of SE-14 of Sect . 11-115-23 lying South of Jackson View Addition ZONING: R-2 Urban Residential LAND USE: Vacant (proposed single and two-family lots ) APPLICABLE REGULATIONS : Section 12 , Subdivision Regulations FINDINGS REQUIRED: Section 12.03 , Subd. 4, Section 12. 05 Proposal: The applicant is requesting Final Plat Approval of South Parkview 1st Addition which is designated in three phases ; Phase I , the final plat of 25 lots ; Phases II and III the final plat of five Outlots , four of which shall be replatted into developable lots in the future. Surrounding Land Uses : North = R-2 Residential East - Public parkland South - Public parkland West - R-2 Residential Considerations : 1. On August 21 , 1984, the City Council approved the Preliminary Plat of South Parkview 1st Addition subject to the following conditions : 1 . Approval of a Title Opinion by the City Attorney. 2 . A Park Dedication in land dedication should be made to provide for the retention basin. 3 . Execution of a Developer' s Agreement for the con- struction of the required improvements : a. A sidewalk to be constructed along the north side of 13th Avenue in accordance with the Design Criteria and Standard Specifications adopted by the City of Shakopee. b. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPUC Utilities Manager. c . Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPUC Utilities Manager. d. Sanitary Sewer and Storm Water System to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer. e. Street improvements be made in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer. f. The developer shall agree to the City Engineer ' s method of apportioning the installments remaining unpaid against the plat and that the developer waives his right to appealing the apportionment . March 1 , 1985 Page -2- 4. The plat should be renamed to South Parkview 1st Addition. 5 . The City Engineer must receive and approve final plans and specifications for all public facilities including, but not limited to, roads , sanitary sewer system, storm sewer and the receipt of the overlot grading plan. 6 . Approval by the Planning Commission of a variance for Quincy Circle to exceed the maximum cul-de-sac length of 500 feet by 82 feet for the reason that a design change of 13th Avenue was required by the City and County Engineers which necessitated .a change in the design of Quincy Circle. 7 . Ten foot drainage and utility easements must be provided along all lot lines . 8 . The developer must provide all street signs . 9 . Two subdivision bench marks located in the final plan. 10 . The developer shall submit- to the County Engineer construction plans for access to CR 15 and obtain permit. 11 . Construction plans approved and filed with the City Engineer prior to recording the plat . 12 . Funding for the oversizing of 13th Avenue will be pro- vided by the City of Shakopee. 13 . There shall be a one to ten ratio for duplex develop- ment as agreed to by the developer. 14. A planting easement will be provided on Lots 1-9 , Block 1 , where these lots abut CR 15 . 2 . The developer intends to develop the plat in phases . Phase I shall consist of 25 lots , of which 20 shall be designated developable at this time . The remainder of the plat shall be designated Outlots A, B, C, D and E. Outlots A through D shall be replatted in the future. 3 . The Utility Manager indicates that water is available and that the electric service and street lighting will be designed at the time the developer requests service. 4. Outlot E is a land dedication in accordance with the Park Dedication requirements . Because it will be used as a retention basin the deed should be made available at this time . 5 . The City Engineer indicates that required revisions must be made to the construction plans which will include which lots shall be designated for twin homes . 6 . Phase I construction of roadways must end in temporary hammerhead turnarounds . The turnarounds must be replaced with a temporary cul-de-sac if the balance of the road construction is not completed in one ( 1 ) year. 7 . The developer must determine what portion of the lift station is attributed to other development in order for a cost determination to be made. 8 . The City of Shakopee acknowledges that it must replace parts of the sanitary sewer between 6th Avenue and Jefferson and 4th Avenue and Adams . Modifications must also be made to the swimming pool filter. 9 . The developer must grant right of entry or easements to the City for the hammerhead turnarounds for Outlots A, B, C; Lot 3 Block 3 and Lot 5 Block 2 for the purpose of road maintenance. March 1 , 1985 Page -3- 10. Because Madison Street will be constructed only to a highpoint , Lots 3 and 4 Block 3 and Lots 5 , 6 , 7 Block 2 shall be nonbuildable until Phase II facilities serving the lots are completed. 11 . The developer has indicated that he will do all of the construction for Phase I . 12 . The County Engineer has reviewed and approved the plat. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the final plat of South Parkview 1st Addition subject to the following conditions : 1 . Approval of a Title Opinion by the City Attorney. 2 . Outlot E shall be dedicated (park dedication) for use as a retention basin. 3 . Executionof a Developers Agreement for the construction of the required improvements : a. A sidewalk to be constructed along the north side of 13th Avenue when Phases II and III are constructed, in accordance with the Design Criteria and Standard Specifications adopted by the City of Shakopee. b. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPDC Utilities Manager. C. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPUC Utilities Manager. d. Sanitary sewer and storm water system be installed in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer. e. Street improvements be made in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer. Phase I construction of roadways must end in temporary hammerhead turn- arounds which must be replaced with a temporary cul-de- sac if the balance of the road construction is not completed within one year. f. The developer shall agree to the City Engineer' s method of apportioning the installments remaining unpaid against the plat .and that the developer waives his right to appealing the apportionment. 4. The City Engineer must receive and approve revised final plans and specifications for all public facilities including, but not limited to, roads , sanitary sewer system, storm sewer and the receipt of the overlot grading plan. 5 . Approval by the Planning Commission of a variance for Quincy Circle to exceed the maximum cul-de-sac length of 500 feet by 82 feet for the reason that a design change of 13th Avenue was required by the City and County Engineers which necessitated a change in the design of Quincy Circle . 6 . Outlots A, B, C and D comprise Phases II and III and must be replatted prior to any development. 7 . The developer shall provide all street signs . 8 . The developer shall submit to the County Engineer construc- tion plans for access to CSAH 15 and obtain a permit when Phases II and III are developed. 9 . Funding for the oversizing of 13th Avenue will be provided by the City of Shakopee . March 1 , 1985 Page -4- 10 . There shall be a one to ten ratio for duplex development as agreed to by the developer. 11 . A planting easement will be provided on Lots 1-9 , Block 1 , where these lots abut CR 15 . 12 . The developer must determine what portion of the lift station is attributed to other development . 13 . The developer shall grant to the City of Shakopee right of entry easements for hammerhead turnarounds for Outlots A, B, C ; Lot 3 Block 3 and Lot 5 Block 2 . 14. Lots 3 and 4, Block 3 and Lots 5 , 6 , 7 Block 2 shall be nonbuildable until Phase II facilities serving the lots are completed. Action Requested: Motion to recommend approval of the Final Plat of South Parkview 1st Addition, with conditions to the City Council . JS : cah 7C/ MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judi Simac , City Planner RE: Amendment to the Shoreland Ordinance DATE: March 15 , 1985 Introduction- At their March 14 , 1985 meeting, the Planning Commission approved a motion to recommend to the City Council that Sections 11. 21 and 11. 35 , Subd. 2 of the City Code be amended to remove the Shakopee Mill Pond, Minnesota River, Blue , Fischer and Rice Lakes from the Shoreland District. Background• The DNR had required the Minnesota River to be included as a protected water in the Shoreland Ordinance. The Minnesota River, along with the Shakopee Mill Pond, Blue, Fischer and Rice lakes , had previously been in the area designated as floodplain. The results of placing these waters in a shoreland classification are: a) The floodplain area is replaced by Shoreland classification. b) The requirement that l) land within 1, 000 feet from the ordinary highwater mark of a lake, pond or flowage and 2 ) land within 300 feet of a river or stream or the land- ward side of a floodplain, be placed in a Shoreland category results in properties such as Valley Fair, the vacant B-1 property east of Valley Fair, School Bus Sales , Met Sewer Board, Pioneer Hi-Bred and Ziegler among those whose I-2 and B-1 zoning changes to Shoreland (essentially single family and agricultural land uses ) . Obviously the rezoning of these properties directly affects the existing and future land uses . The existing facilities become non- conforming uses which may not expand and the vacant land is prohibited from development. Alternatives - The City acted in good faith to comply with the requirements of -the State law that the DNR is responsible for enforcing. However, staff believes this compliance should not create undue hardships for the affected property owners if there are acceptable alternatives which both protect the environmentally sensitive areas and allows property owners the highest and best use of their land. Page two Memo - Shoreland Ordinance Following the discussion of this issue with our DNR repre- sentative, John Stine, the following alternatives were proposed: 1) Remove the Shakopee Mill Pond, Minnesota River , Blue, Fischer, and Rice Lakes from the Shoreland district and continue to designate this area as floodplain as designated by the federal flood insurance maps . 2 ) Amend the Shoreland Ordinance to allow for multiple types of Shoreland Districts . 3 ) Prepare a revised Shoreland Ordinance in the form of an overlay. Recommendation: The DNR, staff and Planning Commission recommend alternative #1 . The alternative has been researched and effectively eliminates the problem. Requested Action• Offer Ordinance No. 162* , an ordinance which amends Section 11. 21 and 11. 35 , Subd. 2 of the Cita Code by removing the Shakopee Mill Pond Minnesota River, Blue , Fischer and Rice Lakes from the Shoreland District, and move for its adoption. The City Attorney is preparing the Ordinance which will be available at the March 19 , 1985 City Council :meeting. tw 7d ORDINANCE NO. 162 Fourth Series An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee Amending Shakopee City Code, Chapter 11 entitled "Land Use Regulations(Zoning)" by removing Certain Protected Areas from Section 11.21 and from Section 11.35 Subd 2 as Setout in Ordinance No. 149 Fourth Series and by Adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code, Chapter 1 and Sec 11.99 which Among Other Things Contain Penalty Provisions THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION I: Repeal A. The following areas are removed from the protected waters catagory: 1. Shakopee Mill Pond 2. Minnesota River 3. Blue Lake 4. Fischer Lake 5. Rice Lake B. The following areas are removed form the Shoreland district classification: 1. Shakopee Mill Pond - Natural Environment 2. Minnesota River - General Development 3. Blue Lake - Natural Environment 4. Fischer Lake - Natural Environment 5. Rice Lake - Natural Environment SECTION II: Penalty Shakopee City Code, Chapter 1 entitled " General Provisions and Definitions applicable to the entire City Code including penalty for violations" and Sec 11.99 entitled "Violations a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION III: When in Force and Effect After the adoption, signing and attestation of this ordiance it shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City of Shakopee and shall then be in full force and effect. Adopted in session of the Shakopee City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of 1985. ATTEST: Mayor of the City of Shakopee City Clerk r,-...-.., .. .,.., I—— 'I - Fr. +-1.4 7f— MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judi Simac, City Planner RE: Amendment to the City Code Section 11. 21 ( Zoning Map) by redelineating the Floodplain District DATE: March 15 , 1985 Background: On May 1 , 1984 the City Council approved a motion which directed staff to prepare an Ordinance which revises the zoning map so that the floodplain district delineating the floodway and flood fringed district conforms to the flood boundary and floodway map as prepared for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Scott County, March 1978 , prepared by the U. S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Develop- ment, Federal Insurance Administration. Essentially, the zoning map was incorrect, not in accordance with the HUD Insurance Regulations , and needed to be corrected. The Engineering Department has made the changes to the zoning map, however an Ordinance was never adopted (Public Hearing was held, Planning Commission approved, as did Council on May 1, 1984 ) . The official map has been revised, the administration has been in accordance with the revisions, however we need to follow-up with an official amendment to Section 11. 21. Requested Action: Offer Ordinance No. 163* , an Ordinance which amend Section 11. 21 of the City Code by conforming the floodway and flood fringed districts to the flood boundary and floodway map prepared by the U. S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Insurance Administration, and move for its adoption. *The City Attorney is preparing the Ordinance which will be available at the March 19 , 1985 City Council meeting. tw ORDINANCE NO. 163 Fourth Series An Ordinance to Amend Section 11.21 (Zoning Map) of the City Code So That the Flood Plain District Delineating the Floodway and Flood Fringed District Confroms to the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map Prepared for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Scott County, March, 1978, by the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Insurance Administration and by adopting by Reference Shakopee City Code Chapter 1, and Sec. 11.99, which among other Things Contain Penalty Provisions THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA , ORDAINS: SECTION I: Repeal Shakopee City Code, Chapter 11 is hereby amended by repealing Section 11.21 entitled "Zoning Map" SECTION II: Zoning Map The Zoning Map of the City of Shakopee prepared by the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Scott County, March 1978 by the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Insurance Administration, is hereby adopted by reference as though shown in all details herein. The boundaries of the districts are hereby established as shown on said map. Said map shall be kept on file in the office of the City Administrator hereinafter referred to as the "Zoning Map". Said map and all of the notations,references and other information shown thereon including reservations for future public use and street thoroughfare plan shall have the same force and effect as if fully setdown herein and are hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if setforth herein at length. Subsequent revisions, if any, shall be forthwith shown thereon. SECTION III: Penalty Shakopee City Code, Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions applicable to the entire City Code including penalty for violations" and Sec 11.99 entitled Violations a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION IV: When in force and effect After the adoption, signing and attestation of this ordinance it shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City of Shakopee and shall then be in full force and effect. Adopted in session of the Shakopee City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of , 1985. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Prepared and approved as to form this 18th day of March, 1985 011 Shakopee City Attorney a CL i X __........._ V a � ix 1 , �cs /Cl t ! t � LA. t. .{.. . �. Qa - •• tom- -0 � �� ,•� ; o z a o .. J LL 0 ul —4 Ljog V _ �... MEMO TO: Planning Commission and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson , City Administrator RE: Requests for Major Rezonings DATE: March 11 , 1985 Lntroduction The City of Shakopee completed a re-evaluation of its zoning east of County Road 17 lifting a 90 day moratorium in August and passing new ordinance changes in September of 1984 . Since that time City staff has received additional exploratory requests for possible rezonings on a fairly major scale. Problem The frequency and the scope of the exploratory requests for rezoning taken cummulatively have caused concern on staff ' s part . Staff is also concerned about the impact of increasing real estate values on our present zoning , both from a legal and a practical perspective. To address these two concerns in a timely fashion staff is sending this memo to both the Planning Commission and City Council to consider a joint meeting to discuss zoning and rezoning issues even though it has been less than one year since we last addressed this issue . The attached map indicating parcels for which we have received rezoning inquiries indicates graphically the scope of the potential rezoning requests that we may be confronted with. In addition , the attached excerpt from the Minnesota Real Estate Journal dated March, 1985 indicates that land values are soaring at the present time. Please read the article carefully focusing specifically on the section entitled "Land Prices Soar" . The second item in the article that Planning Commission Members and City Council Members may wish to take particular note of is the possible request for a major rezoning in the Industrial Park by Scottland. Alternatives 1 . Deal with each rezoning request when a formal application is made. This procedure would be similar to what we have been doing in the past and Planning Commission and Council would be relying on the data available through the application which may or may not reflect the total scope of rezoning requests that the two bodies may receive . Second , this would mean that any such requests would be considered in light of normal planning principles and the most recently completed study upon which the September., 1984 zoning decisions were based . 2. Have a general meeting between the Planning Commission and the City Council to establish a procedure or policy that would be employeed when the City receives major rezoning requests. This would require that the two bodies establish some type of criteria to use in defining what a major rezoning is , and requirements for comprehensively looking at all aspects of the rezoning request in the context of rezoning requests around the Track. Specifically , this might mean that the bodies might establish a three to six month review and study period for any such major request. Recommendation City staff recommends exploring alternative No . 2 through a joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting even if the results of such a meeting are to continue with something very similar to our current processing procedures. Action Requested 1 . Pass a motion recommending to the City Council that the Planning Commission and City Council hold a joint meeting to discuss at a policy level the need for more comprehensive procedures for reviewing major rezoning requests. 2. Recommend to the City Council that such a joint meeting be held on the evening of March 26 , 1985 at 7 : 30 p.m. or other alternative date. JKA/jms _ ♦ R I , Go � sr-�•,10�` 1 I �-- VALLEY FAIR AMUSE HENT PARK If�ho 3 I i t &L va I l! ORrh / vq r Lf r � g � �hQ VALLEY ►ARK FIFTH [}1 I rh s _ r I --�- J RA� ETRACK' ; J s e:w w Sq p -T y AV41H AVISTv �s o NORTHERN s I ( ( i KILLARNEY NILLL ADUN Deon Lc do not c.onietm Z y N}rtEC1T0 AL1 t e.¢!S i >�n� �o� M ` filtT FICO;- 7f f-Z)p S C10+ 1 C LLaQ- v=P Pr 16 � l I \ g 17 \ 15 s, \ v� HILLSIDE a ESTATES r z ■ W Y VALI[Y VKM RD u r 2 In U 9 20 21 22 C[ ' O � �ru 2 i I Page Minnesota heat Es[a[r Journal March 1885- ' /J '' .!.••Q• and is seeking permits for a$4 million-plus ^"9`a�..,r^-�J _._t +. ,t,,,M,,• ,� �- - ,. _ -x recreational horse condomtmum. It will } + .,� have 200 stalls that are expected to sell for $20.000 apiece.The stable,one of the lar- gest in the state,will be 570 feet long and ��•� - ;, a, -v-�,y `_+vases; 220 feet wide,with two large arenas inside and two outside. i, � - +►�`�� >�7 "� Horse Bam architect Darrel Sibbet,of ^ '•+� 1rI _ �,a i t Sibbet and Associates,Jordan,said the sta- t ble would have a countr)club atmosphere with beautiful landscaping,a clubhouse, lounge and other amenities.Construction , is expected to begin this summer. New Direction for VIP ' ... Although thcrc rrwv g not be a develop- ment ,,. • Y - rush this year,Scottiand Inc..whic owns Valley Industrial Park adjacent to the �-r -' track,as well as much of the track itself, is betting that there will be a boom of sorts _ in the years ahead. 4•�-w. ��" k Scouland,according to Vice President -W F4i Tim Keane,is redesigning the land use plan for its 1,100 acres of available land. "It's _ not going to be an industrial park anymore. Approximately 100 acres may be set azide for light industrial development.but - _ - -- - - -- - - - the remainder will be used to accommo- - date spin-off development from the race The : Shako y�ee Scenario �ek,Keane said,"Were evolving because . - - .. of the track!, One of the major access roads to the track passes through the heart of the indus- - --` trial park,he said."Next year there could be a Behind the scene maneuvering is intense and land prices are throughthepark who've nion and. half�pseenrit beg_ skyrocketing, but nobody's digging dirt yet in Minnesota's f°re andS a`°�a word°fp�the frac' Since Shako was selected as the stack sire last March, Scortland has had three future horseracing capital. BY PATRICK BOULAY ti.nalfficano hotel inquiries by upscale from tional and local franchises.and a few from the economy-and moderate-priced hotel organisations that were less serious.Kearse Hopes are still high in Shakopee for Opportunities promised for$2DW a year ago,is now being offered said.All wanted to know,about traffic flow, a boom in spin-off development From the beginning,Shakopee city offi- at around$4,000,he said. projected attendance, demographics and surrounding the state's first pari-mutuel vials, local developers, and commercial He cautions, however,that there is a the schedule for the first season. horse racing track.but its not going to hap- real estate agents have had realistic views difference between what one asks for and Holiday Inn was interested in a pen during Canterbury Downs'premiere of what opportunities the track promised. what one gets.So far,there have been few Shakopee site,he added,but the location season. An environmental assessment worksheet takers at these prices. now under construction in Burnsville won Even though no one expected the boom prepared as pan of Minnesota Racetrack That will change.he predicted,once the out as being safer. It's close enough to to happen right away,given the flood of in- Inc:s proposal spelled out the extent of first race is run."We II see a lot of trans- service the track,but it won't have to rely,- terest that began a year ago.there is some spin-off activity that could be expected: actions.That's when they will realize that on it to survive. dismay among iocai real estate agents,de- Approximately 10 to 15 acres of develop- this is not a pipe drearn,but that somcdung Keane wouldn't say what ether hotels velopers.civic and government leaders that ment that would include a tack shop,a is actually happening.I think it will take were interested,but he said they were con- there hasn't been more activity to date. hotel,a motel and a service station.The off quickly.And it won't go for 54.000 an ducting market studies and waiting to see The prevailing wisdom is that Camerbu- study said that this development and exist- acre anymore; maybe 58.000 to what happens with the first racing season. ry Downs will first have to prove itself a ing local commercial enterprises would be $10.000...Land owners are holding steady The in°uines on development opportu- commercial success before major de- able to handle the 10.000-plus patrons who and are waiting for the right price.In five nines most likely to happen this year are velopers will make a move.Estimates of would attend the track on an average day. years,their land will be worth a fortune and from those interested in tack shops or attendance and betting levels aren't good The conservative expectations.however, they know it" - - recreational vehicle parks. enough.Developers want actual figures.It are tempered with a belief that development Brown said he had talked with more than "The tack shops want to be here im- will take at least one racing season,possi- will be much more significant.if other lo- two dozen speculators,most of whom are mediately," Keane said. Regardless of buy two,to provide them with the informs- cal attractions such as Valievfair Family from outside the state,with a heavy con- what the attendance is going to be,there tion they need. Amusement Park,the high-stakes Little Six centration of Texans and South Dakotans. will be a lot of horses and a big demand While people may be eager to bet on the Bingo Palace,the Renaissance Festival and At least 10 have taken a tour of the area in for harnesses,saddles and other horse sup- Ponies,few appear willing to gamble,at Murphy's Landing (an assemblage of search of horse stables and pasture land, plies and services.Nothing,however,has least for now.Here is what has happened historic buildings) were marketed along hobby farms and ranches. happened yet. to date in race track-related development: Another local real estate agent,Marge The"most solid"inquiries to Sconland _ Henderson,said the many phone calls she are plans for developing a recreational ve- •Land prices adjacent to the track have received due to the[tack have only result- hicle park.An RV park requires a relative- skyrocketed by more than 100 percent.and - ed in the sale of some pasture land for Tac- ly small front-end investment beyond the ►aid within]0 miles of the track has at least with the track,the area could become a ing thoroughbreds."Every person with ag land, Keane said, and it's geared for doubled in value. Potential buyers have tourist mecca. land thought it(development)would hap- seasonal use.In addition,it would benefit been numerous,but only a few sales have The synergistic reaction of these enter- pen overnight.I think it's going to happen, from traffic from nearby Valleyfair as been completed. tainment facilities would amplify anything but it will be a little slower than we first well. •Several national hotel chains are report- the track alone could do.People would be anticipated." But nothing has happend with that plan edly conducting market studies,but they more willing to spend mom money in the In fact,she said.development may be either. are wailing to see what happens during the area with so much to do. stunted partly because of increased land Keane said Sconland is not bothered by first season. - prices. Some of her clients looking for the lack of development to date."Every- *Several developers are seriously interest- - Land Prices Soar pastures and stables have opted to buy in body's moving catmoush.Especially us.' ed in building a recreational vehicle park Sensing the possibilities,local landown- nearby Dakota County where costs are 50 In looking at the market and planning rtear the track. ers are pricing their land accordingly.said percent lower. how to develop it.Scottland has to take •A local industrial park adjacent to the Gene Brown, who awns Gene Brown into account how dramatically the area will track is considering setting aside 1,000 of Realty and has been involved in Shakopee Opportunities Taken likely change in the next five years alone, its remaining 1.100 acres fortrack-related - real estate for 24 years While speculators have been speculating, Keane said. commercial development rather than con- "If the land is directly adjacent to the and commercial developers have been hold- The track has influenced the Minnesota tinuing industrial development. track.it has gone from around$2.000 an ing their breath.Les Malkerson has taken Department of Transportation to assign a •A local recreational riding stable has acre to 525,000 an acre:'Bram said."it the first real steps in capitalizing on the higher priority to the long-planned high- been convened into a rehabilitation facili- could go up to 540.000 per acre:' track. way bypass for Shakopee. The by tv to help race horses recover from inju- Less than two miles from the track.the For years he operated the Malkerson would reroute traffic south of the city from ries.This is the only actual track-related value of prime developed commercial real River Ranch Stables less than a mile off Highway 169 and Highway 41 to Highway- - development to occur. estate at Road 17 and Highway 101,oc- Highway 169 on Highway 41 in Chaska. - 101 near the Bloomington Ferry Bridge. •There have been many in-and out-of- copied by a SuperAmerica service station. This winter his family recreational riding Land acquisition for the bypass began last state developers expressing interest, and the Shakopee Valley Motel, Perkins stable was convened into a facility for tram- fall. Design could begin this spring and there has been a lot of talk,but little action. Restaurant,Burger King and McDonalds, ing and rehabilitating race horses,said his construction could begin in the next 30 to •Atter six months of struggling for imn- has gone from 530.000 an acre to more than son.Bruce Malkerson. 36 months rather than in the next seven to ship and county approval,permits are now S80.000.Brown said. The Minnesota Valley Equine Center has 10 vears. being sought for a recreational horse con- One of the largest increases in land prices -100 stalls and a 5/8-mile track with spe- The bypass will run right through Val- dominium.ICs not for race horses,but will is along a new road.Shenandoah Drive. cially banked curves that reduce the stress ley Industrial Park and will have ramps capitalize on the expected boom in interest which connects Highway 101 to 4th Avenue on a horse's legs.Those tunes allow the near the track,he said. in horses in general. - abutting the track and is a major traffic horse to run and speed up its recovery,or MnDoi is also working with the cinof •Delays in establishing a horse ordinance leeder to the track.There.Brown said,ask- merely train with a reduced risk of injury. Shakopee on the financing and construc- for Scott County.combined with the high ing prices have soared to the 5100.000 to The facility will be able to accept race tion of a new Highway 169 bridge over the land prices.have caused some developers 5150.000 per acre range. horses this month, though most of the Minnesota River. with plans for million dollar stables to hook Five to 10 miles from the track,agricul- horses aren't expected until just before the - And there are the plans for a new Min- to surrounding counties to build their tural land prices also have increased be- track opens in June.Developer A.H.Boys nesota River crossing to replace the projects. cause of the track.Land that was selling Inc.of.Des Moines hasobtained approval 111i"A eon a peer v- pia h 198 Minnooia Neal Estate lounwl ode 32 attended had a greater awareness of the M Bradley's comments.But,he said,the NADP problem cant be fixed in one year. "It s ^^�. probiems facing the commercial real estate problem tic n'think fixed In n It crept up (-fL�. indusm than they did a year earlier �� increased ower the las[several years and we have to } C -w'e're two vears into our program and whittle it down" l.0 S�. Paul trcrds are important:'Erickson said. "I from 22 cents per An impauent Ken Stensby,president of think we've turned the corner.Our intense G United properties, said that legislators LOBBED educational effort has paid oft" Square fDOt 211 1977 ••didn't blink"when taxes increased 3(i per- LAWIVIAKE" Legislative committee chairman Jim /l' p / cent to 40 percent in one year.-Why not Stuebner said the legislators he talked with to $1.Q3 in 1984. come down as fast"" by Patrick Bouiay had a much more recepuve amtude toward 'Y Schreiber replied that many legislators business problems.He would have liked to would have a difficult time supporting that have had more legislators attend.but he I was to be a night to lobby state legis- was pieased that House Tax Cnrmm mee ta had the five highest property taus. action. shift reduce the tax that en to hockly would lators one-on-one. A chance Chairman Jim Schreiber actively panic- R vieb�r�)vn Ceident ass�Wt>ea n ity "Try thaard run ford re-election, he said, for delegates of the Upper Midwest Chap- ipated. 71 the political realty. ter of the National Association of Indus- State Rep.Chuck Dimler,who couldn't his property taus increased from`..cents emphasizing trial and Office Parks(NAIOP)o mate stay for the dinner and presentation,said per square foot in 1477 to$1.03 in 1984. Bradley shot back. iYeah.but try and thea case for commercial and industrial svtampathy forrnessman NAIO ''sp and tax reformer he "1979 to 1994 was the worst the Depression.Sales were downo40sinceper- and tell thebring a m thetptropem tax istate s four�nmu property tax relief. P�?tY Unfortunately, only a handful of the proposal.Realistically,be said,We thrust cent,we laid people off,and we had a 134 as high!" Redeln old NAIOP members more than 20 lawmakers who were invited is on the income tax this year."(C will be percent increase m the property • that he svmpathius with them. "We're showed up at the St.Paul Hotel for the tial and industrial propem'taxes)will be Belie 'said. social hour,dinner on Feb.6.Only three addressed, but I don't see it getting the - He explained o the legislators that t rs - going o try o make some change,but or tour stayed after the meal o hear the same emphasis as the income tax." the tenants,the small businesses,who pry,. �� attax is a shifiwha�Yr you do to ou can't lower ore up of legislators pa presentation.And only two addressed the The small grc the tax,not the landlords.And be told them:.. m' aporoximately 40 NAJOP members. listened to Stuebner outline NAIOP's why he expanded his operation to anter., Florida," Because of the vas[range of state taxes (me NAIOP member termed the event seven-point, five-year plan o make where propem taus are animaucally "a tomb"because of the no-shays.But fol- property u taxes fair and more competitive lower.Quoung Karl Marx,Bndiey said, up for debate this session,commercial and lowing the meeting,NAIOP's legislative with other states.He showed slides of 25 "The one way o kill capitalism is taxes, intheto just onrm e o{no�y Ittbh+vist Jim Erickson tried to pia[the even- similar properties from around the coon- taus and more taus" as etional or volatil _ ing into perspective.The legislators who try and old how the properties in Muuheo- lax chairman Schreiber was impressedas farm relief orues,and it'stincome tax reduction. e — Stuebner,though,said that all NAIOP is really hoping for this session is a sign, however small,that"things are going to change in Minnesota" The issue of commercial and property tax reform should go before the Lzgislarure re " sometime in March. SEEKING- . !SHAKOPEE)*,­page 2S Bloomington Fem Bridge that will likely include a direct access to I-494 along a wi- DEVELO ENdened and straightend County Road 18 _ through Eden Prairie. Before any major development commit- - mens are made, Keane said. Scotland - - - would have o know more about the timeta- bles of these higbway plans.At present, land on Highway 101 near Valleyfair is _ - - - - considered the front door to the racetrack. But the proposed bypass would make it the - .. PROPOSALS...- - backdoor and could alter traffic patterns .. '..,y - - enough to ruin a project that wasn't caro- fully placed. Add to this tangled equation the difficulty of predicting the success of the — subsequent seasons. Ilk .� The premier season is only 78 days long, PM T commencing lune 29.The second season °"°*°'�^+,`„•;, - - will be 122 days.If the first season goes well,it doesn't necessarily mean that that - / success will continue for the duration of .a..0 - a longer season 'PR. oa.,, . ux��st \... Keane said the racetrack in Winnipeg •• � has a 10-month racing season.Canterbu- x ry Downs.with its enclosed grandstand to x rCp:. � •.wx - protect spectators from the cold and rain, •'� ��� _' - - _ may well have a nine-month season in the - - _ years ahead. -- - Still,the first season will be the litmus ( ,,�,„,,•, " s test that will warn potential developers to ) .. i!hl IetF, ' -G• either stay out,jump in with both feet,or move in with caution. Shakopee City Planner Judi Sirbac,said the barrage of phone calls to her office in �� �� ✓'- '' �- — the months after the track site was named 'owaara� .my_ is now down to a manageable four or five €r r� �• ' ' per day."So far,there isn't anything hap peni Last s, �lll���JJJ LLL,,,SSS J l( _ Last spring.in anticipation of a develop L rL . "` •ws. ment rush,the City Council approved aU ❑ ,�� ° three-month moratorium on zoning VU1d1� .. chanees around the track so thoughtM at- tenuon could be given to what type of de- velopment should be accommodated. he City of Mankato is seeking development Financing District.It is anticipated that the City Although ground has vet to be broken Tproposals for a 60,000 square foot retail will retain the ownership of the land and offer near the track.Sumac said the city is ready mini-mall on a 5.39 acre redevelopment an attractive long-term lease, and willing to work with developers. So,the downs of new spin-off business- site.The property is situated near the Dawn- - es and industries with the accompanying town Mall,between the new Hy-Vee Food Store Look at our site and our growing retail market thousands of jobs most people had hoped and the new Snell Motors. and... for won't happen this year. Shakopee will have to settle for the The majority of the property in the development racetrack alone,with its of stables, square site is owned the C and has been cleared. scat grandstand,downs of stable,700 by ray seasonal and 80 year-round track em- The dashed lines on the map show the remain- Mahe It plovees,the 1.200 trainers and stable em- ing three parcels that are yet to be acquired piovees, and thousands of additional and cleared. `Man *afot insist each day passing through the bus- y iness distract. The site is zoned commercial and abtrth or a mo The where the city's future I might he if it had not been chosen as the arterial road which will be completed in 1985. track's tome.1985 should be a pretty good All of the property lies within o Tax Increment Canted rte,M.Mauro or lorry A *v w(507)625.316.' Year. F ya,/ MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: LeRoy Houser, Building Official RE: Johnson-Reiland Construction Permit DATE: March 12 , 1985 Introduction: Mr. Reiland ' s recollection of the permit sequence appears to be flawed. Background: Mr. Reiland has requested a refund of the penalty fee charged on Building Permit No. 6494. He indicates justification for refund is based on the fact that he applied for the permit on 10/18/84 and it was not issued until 10/25/84, when he promptly picked it up. He also states that he started excavation after he was verbally notified the permit was ready. Two errors exist in his recollection of the sequence of events . One, he applied for the permit on 10/22/84 .not 10/18/84 and it was issued within three days of application, as our policy requires . Two, the excavation was commenced prior to even our verbal approval of the permit. This opinion is based on our personal observation that the excavation was nearly complete when we were on site the morning of the 25th, when we issued the correction notice. Alternatives : 1 . Do not refund the penalty fee. 2 . Refund the penalty fee. 3 . Refund part of the penalty fee. Recommendation: Do not refund the penalty fee . Action Requested: Do not refund the penalty fee of $460. 50 charged to Johnson- Reiland Construction. LH: cah Attachment APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 612- 5-3650 B.P. 44N APPLICANT TO COMPLETE NUMBEIIED SPACES ONLY 1.PROJECT ADDRESf. 2 OWNER OF LAND NAME ADDRESS S.DESCRIPTION OF LAND BY:LOT. L O'�' ,7, ✓l0(/�J /L"Lr/; Gy c��'`J GAJ+,�, 's BLOCK.ADDITION.PARCEL NO: - - METES AND BOUND$:PLAT. le- A.APPLICANT: �UTO7 EILTaNI DA.SY lNL /V00/f') �'PE� I✓'✓ NAME - -ADDRESS S. CONTRACTOR NAME ADDRESS 4. CLASS OF WORK - - 'ADDITION O-ALTERATION C-REPAIR C-MOVE 0-RAZING ICEHOUSE[D-SIGN - C-PATIO C-PORCH O-STORAGE BLCG [D-TANK O-DRIVEWAY C-FENCE [D-GARAGE 7. USE OF STRUCTURE S1EJ I I L L C Jti - - - - - B.- DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT B:- BLDG WIDTH _ {..� - -- BLDG LENGTH 3Cl - BLDG HEIGHT 10. ESTIMATED COST OR VALUE: S Gam, ��Qa SPACE BELOW FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY TYPE OF CONST TOTAL SO FEET FIRE ZONE .NO DWELLING LN TSjOCCUP ANCY GROUP NO OF STORIES - N Z .USE ZON _/l DIV15.0. MAA OCC LOAD FIRE SP IERS OFFSTREET P ARK G SPACES - I NKL (REO D (DYES C NOICOVERED IUNCCIVERED LIMITING CONDITIONS APPLICATION APPROVALS Ordinance No. 115 -Easement Restrictions - attached I /y)�yrn /p o=3 8fL E w.i>�_�✓� "J/ L.��-/Om /�y IING ADMINISTRATOR - DATE COMMENTSy TY E.GINE R TE CITY EUILDI G OFFICIAL DAT APPLICATION FEES NOTES PERM[­ S :1�/, _f`i 1. SEPARATE-PERMITS ARE REOUIRED FOR PLAN CHECK S ELECTRICAL. PLUMBING. MECHANICAL. SEPTIC /± _ TANK.SIGNS.AND WELL INSTALLATIONS. - GRADE AND SURVEY CHECK S 2.THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK PARKA NO LAND OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COM- FIRE NUMBER 5 MENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS,OR IF CONSTRUCTION IS 5 .SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 WATEF CONNECTION_ DAYS AT ANYTIME AFTER WORK 1S COMMENCED. SEWER CONNECTION 3. A COLORED PHOTOGRAPH MUST ACCOMPANY WELL A,NO SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM S �3 OG ALL RELOCATION PERMIT APPLICATIONS. pENAI'"Y OR APPEAL S ♦.TWO SETS OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS MUST ACCOMPANY EACH PERMIT APPLICATION FOR THE I STATE SURCHARGE S FOLLOWING: A.COMMERCIAL PROJECTS •%1=��`I B.INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS X ? C.RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS ^VI U SIGNvAW1 OF (OVER) Q�l �, 1/Ff r DATE WHITE-INSPECTOR YELLOW-FILE PINK•APPLICANT BUILDING DEPARTMENT SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA i Correction Notice I Job Located aLM0 Ca/,RF I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and have found the following violations of City and/or State laws governing same: 77, ilr-7 4-71 1 i You are hereby notified that no more work shall be done upon these premises until the above violations are corrected. When corrections have been made, call for inspection. . Date Inspector forq DeM. DO NOT REMOVE THIS TAG Johnson- Reiland Construction Inc. DESIGNERS&BUILDERS CUSTOM ONE March 8, 1985 City of Shakopee 129 First Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55379 Attention: City Council Regarding: 8563 McGuire Court Permit fee for above address Dear Sirs: On 10-18-84 we applied for a building permit for the above captioned property, and were advised it would be two to three days before the permit would be issued. On 10-23-84 we were told everything was ok with the exception of the engineer's signature. The engineer was out of thr office on business for a couple of days , thus he was unable to sign off until 10-25-84. One 10-25-84 we received notice that the permit was ready, we start- ed excavation that morning and picked up the permit in the afternoon, thus we were charged $460.50 penalty which we feel was unjustified. Due to the lateness of the season , timing was critical : We would appreciate the refunding of the penalty charge. Si nc 1 ou. s� banie C. eilan President ` `L�'l�S'v1�rts dn-WierBiv6. Suite 301 Bloomington, MN 55437 831-3201 tach member firm¢independently owned and operated. gb MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Appointment to the Planning Commission DATE: March 12 , 1985 Introduction & Background On March 5th, Council nominated three candidates for consideration for appointment to the Planning Commission. The three candidates called and of the three two are interested in an appointment, were caDavid Pomerenke.and Mr. Link has reconsidered George Realfled and since his application of January 31 , 1985 and does not wish to be appointed at this time. He did ask that we keep his applica- tion on file for a future opening. Action Recommended 1. Conduct election. ion to 2. Appoint to the Planning Be�erlysKoehnenfthrough ill the vacancy created by the resignation January 31 , 1986. JSC/jms October 15 , 1984 CITY OF SHAKOPEE 129 E. 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 "T N: City c��'ministra%OZ Re: Application for Planning Commission Position Dear Sir: We have been residents of Shakopee for almost a year. It has given us time to explore the city and become familiar with all the stores -and services here. We have also made many friends and feel we belong to the community. I am in the landscape business - basically design and installation of plant material and related work. We moved here from Bloomington where we lived for 10 years. Previous to that, thirteen years were in Burnsville where I spent 32 years on the Burnsville Planning Commission, three years as secretary (and chairman for a short time) . During that period Burnsville went through the transition from township to city. We took advantage of the government assistance and developed the 701 comprehensive guide plan for . Burnsville. I am 57 years old. sur Child en are a'li uiarried, 50 I 1- ave the time and 26 years of experience in all phases of project design. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, David -E. Pomerenke 2237 Valley View Road Shakopee, l;N 55379 J� - George Realander 206 Main Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone: 612-445-3762 Experience: A.M. Miller & Assoc. , 7220 Metro Blvd, Edina, Mn 55435. Phone: 612-831-8080. Service: Collection Agency. Position: Collector. Duties: Collections ; retail , medical, commercial, student loan. 6/1/3-current. Allied Interstate Inc. , 5650 No. Lilac Drive, Brooklyn Center, Mn 55430. Phone: 612--560-3450. Sevice: Collection Agency. Position: collector. Duties: Collections: bad checks , retail, legals. Elected to company advisory com- mittee. 4/ 1/82-11/5/82. Community C:--edit Company, 3101 W. 69th St. , Edina, Mn 55435. Phone: 612-920-9270. Service: Finance Company, Position: Marketing F:_nance representative. Duties: Marketing ser- vices to neva finance and current customers. 5/27/81-12/15/81. International Harvester Company (International Hough) , 5633 West Hwy 13 , Savage, Mn55378. Phone: 612-894-1450. Product: Retail distributor rn road construction equipment and truck tractors. Position: Credit Manager, Duties: Management reporting functions relating to credit and collection, in- stallation cf new programs designed to improve the quality of busines and collection of customer accounts. Application of federal, state, and local :regulations relating to finance charges, truth in lending, and equal credit opportunity.. Administration of A/R records , reviewing and setting credit limits, collection of delinquent accounts, legal and small claims. Assimilation of A/R. acquired from sub-branch operation meager. Structuring single investor lease trans- actions equipment contracts, and security agreements in- cluding docurnentation requirements, financial collateral analysis and risk acceptance. Member NACM. Bureau of Credit Control, 15275 Minnetonka Blvd. , Minetonka, Mn 55343 . SE!rvice: Collection. Agency. Position: coverted p.t. collections to asst. Mngr. 3/l/78-2/28/79. Gamble-Skogmo Inc. , 5100 Gamble Drive, St. Louis Park, Mn 55426. Phone : 612-541-6123 . Product: Multi-branch diversified retailer of consumer durables. Position: Collector. Duties: Collection of delinquent revolving and contrct sales accounts, legais. 12/27/77-10-31/78 . Viking Collections, 5001 West 80th St. , Bloomington, Mn 55437. Phone: 612-835-6440 . Service: Collection Agency. Position: Collector. Duties: Collections; commercial, retail, medical. 5/15/77-12/15/77. Education: University of Minnesota,Minneapolis, Mn. , B.S. Bus . Admin. if ff B.A. Pol/Econ. JAMES J. O'BRlEN, D.D.S.. LTD. SHAKOPEE PROFESSIONAL BUILDING 1221 EAST FOURTH AVENUE SHAKOPEE. MN 55379-1698 TELEPHONE: 16121 445-6657 I am married and have three children enrolled in the Shakopee Public Schools . My wife is a substitute teacher in the Shakopee Elementary Schools . I am past president of the Shakopee Rotary Club , a member of the Knights of Columbus and the Shakopee V.F.W. I am active in the church and was chairperson of the Parish Council . I live East of Pike Lake Road between County Road #16 and #42 . I am two blocks within Prior Lake city limits , however , my business is in Shakopee, my children attend Shakopee schools , my church is in Shakopee and my concerns are for Shakopee . I enjoy Shakopee and I am grateful to earn a living in this community . I look to a position on the Planning Committee as an opportunity to grow personally and to contribute to orderly growth and development of our community . I hope my scientific background and my experience with other professional and civic groups will be an asset for this commission . This will be my first involvement in the City Planning and City Government . I anticipate the position with excitement and enthu- siasm. If selected , I will do my very best . Thank you for your consideration . Sincerely , James - 0 ' Brien JJO: jn JAMES J. O'BRIEN. D.D.S., LTD. SHAKOPEE PROFESSIONAL BUILDING 1221 EAST FOURTH AVENUE _ SHAKOPEE. MN 33979.1696 !,A, , n tt � J ►y TELEPHONE: 16121 443-6637 1�. ,'S��t 't -N�,j CK t"`4. February 28 , 1985 Dear Shakopee City Council Members : Please consider my application for a position on the Planning Commission. I graduated from Benilde High School in 1961 and attended St . John ' s University . In 1969 I graduated from the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry . My pre-dental and Dental School curriculm consisted of several chemistry , physics and biology cources . During the summers , while attending Dental School , I worked for the Hennepin County Highway Department as an Engineering technician on new road construction (mainly strom sewer and concrete paving) . Upon graduation I served in the United States Army including a year tour in Vietnam. In February 1973 , I moved to Shakopee and started my Dental practice . I practice in the Shakopee Professional Building on East Fourth Avenue . My dental career has included a part time teaching position at the University of Minnesota and a Fellowship in the Acadamy of General Dentistry ( teaching , fulfilling continuing education requirments and clinical experience) . MEMO TO: City Council FROM: LeRoy Houser, Building Official RE: Overhead Door Bids - Public Works DATE: March 5 , 1985 Introduction: I have advertised for bids for the replacement of six overhead doors at the Public Works Building. Background: The results of the sealed bids are as follows : Ken' s Steel Door Repair $10,910. 58 Peterson Door Company $10,800.00 RE Oslund Construction $11,575. 00 Recommendation: Accept Peterson Door Company' s bid for $10,800.00. Action Requested: Direct staff to issue a purchase order to Peterson. Door Company for the removal of the existing doors and installation of six 20 guage steel overhead doors in the amount of $10,800.00. We have budgeted $11 ,000.00 for this project. LH: cah TO: John K. Anderson , City Administrator FROM: Gregg VoxIand , Finance Director RE: Special Assessment Abatements DATE: March 13, 1985 The Staterequires Council action to abate special assessments o, 0Curre ntproperty tax statements. Parcels 27-001229-0 and 2.'t .^��o-0 have specials showning on the 84/85 tax statement "" have ave been paid in 1984. Therefore C il s Pass the motion requested below to correct the ' ounc needs to rax statements. Move to abate the pay 1985 special balances for parcels 27-001229-0 and 27-001456 0 assessments and remaining prior payment, - because of ' TO: John K. Anderson ; City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland , Finance Director- RE: irectorRE: Tax Forfeit Parcels DATE: March 13, 1985 Introduction &. Background The County has various parcels that are tax deliquent and are being processed for sale. Part of that process is for the City to agree to the classification as conservation or non-conservation. The DNR is also involved in the classification process. The parcels listed are considered non-conservation. The City is also approving the sale of the parcels. Shakopee has the first right to buy the parcels for the price shown or the ` apply to ' the State for a public use deed. This means that we can , if approved , use the parcel for a specific stated public purpose without buying the land and when the use terminates, the land goes back up for sale. Staff has indicated no interest in the City purchasing or using these parcels. Alternatives I . Approve classification and sale 2. Buy selected parcels 3. Apply for public use deed for selected parcels Recommendat 4'.On Alternative No. 1 . Action ReOUested Move to authorize the proper City officials to execute the Certif- icate of County Board of Classification of Forfeited Lands as approved by the County Board on January 29, 1985. ` Form No.AWA—LAND CLASSIFICATION— CERTIFICATE LASSIFICATIOA.—CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY BOARD OF CLASSIFICATION OF FORFEITED LANDS AS PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 386,LAWS 1935 AS AMENDED. Town To the Yillafe Board of the.................la tx.............—.__.�...__._. City T1'e, the numbers of the County Board of the County o ...............SeOtt..................... Minnesota, do hereby certify that the parcels of land hereinafter luted are all of the lands which have been classified by us as ImLeonseruation lands,from the list of lands forfeited to the State of Alinnmota for none payment of taa:es for the year or pears.........1.971...__..... as prouided by Minnesota Statutes 1945,Section 252.01, as amended. SUBDIVISION Sec.or I Twp.or I Appraised N'aiue Appraised Value Lot Block °� I of Land of Timber Notermann Ex S 76' 1 1 I 3,200!00 7E— City of Shakopee Patricia's 1st 1 11 2,300 00 City of Shakopee Patricia's 1st 2 11 2,300 00 City of Shakopee I Patricia's 1st 4 11 2,300 00 City of Shakopee Patricia's 1st 6 11 2,300 00 City of Shakopee Patricia's 1st 1 12 2,300 00 City of Shakopee Patricia's 1st 4 12 2,300 00 City of Shakopee Patricia's 1st 5 12 2,300 00 City of Shakopee Patricia's 1st 6 12 2,300 00 City of Shakopee Timber Trails 3 1 10,400 00 City of Shakopee Timber Trails I 6 1 9,200 00 City of Shakopee Timber Trails 8 1 9,200100 City of Shakopee Timber Trails 9 1 9,200100 City of Shakopee Timber Trails 10 1 i 9,200 00 City of Shakopee I Timber Trails 6 2 11,70010 0 47 City of Shakopee Timber Trails 7 2 11,700L00*— City of Shakopee Timber Trails 3 4 10,400.00 City of Shakopee Timber Trails 4 4 10,400 00 City of Shakopee Timber Trails 5 4 10,400{00 City of Shakopee Timber Trails 1 6 4 10,4001.00 City of Shakopee /AND NO OTHERS / 4— C/�) 1 � I A-tr,-c-i,4 S / ST VI r'• N 790 45' 59 L 165.E :15.00 Southerly right of way ne - 426.96 19N79.4s'S9"E N10.14'01'W of the Chicago, St. Paul o�, 13200 Z200 Z200 z 00, �` " -.; z ji I o Minneapolis and Omaha Rai lroa�� ---- 129. b Ao�� N N`0•` Z a C _ e 120 0c I a L O IT ` C? 2aa £ ; I S790-42' . S 89.13'01'E ' 0 �6 74.00 i 22.00 22 1 ZOO N 22 2NT9'45.59-E ,W$ 74.00 0 W 132 00 O Q 16 n � 5Zz �m • io 74.00 O S�k - o N 4 4 o v q9 % N 89.12'22"W (X) 7�O g p 28600 2 5 fix CY N N 74.00 74.00 g�2 208 80 3N5z�s N Q ' N N N m N N W 00 74A0 0 '� 0 o A Cn e _ a °'N 04.001 N ' KO - 0 74.001 I 0 pa,o S 89.13'01"E 8, 30.00 . y 3219 N N N N e' Al- `'y 89 13'01"E 74ti�y n, $ /�74.00 Q''.' W "N N Or 0 N ZI 2 N , � ..' oN N OD N p. M K- W o 74.00 gO W* O -�: - - - a 5 Z1 4 i� m of a - . :.74 0.,... .N - a to g 74.00 m o - aB90lz'zz'wv o N 421 o �4zl�10 N790 - - 0q b z g 3 74,0 = N Z18 ri $ E 120 0 O N N79'42'38' 0 8 74.00 0 0 122 55 Q p m 154.00 N 89.12 N N Z-Z� N N 22,00 22D0 2200 22.00 22,0 22D 22 1 CW M1 N 0 74.00 �j �' '.1-0-•00• 30.0_0 1r N I Z2 GrN N �� 313 305 b,-- 3�� N 74.00 m Q a ,n W sB9°13'Oi"E M� �°a n c o o o Q p o ion omm n o r v c a a o, = y765432 _0 v .483041 50"E �a _j 0: e a 74 00 --- .6 __ 2200 22.00 22.00 22.00 2200 Y (� 300 N 30.00. 30.00 154.00 N89.12'2CD 2"W �3 74.00 O 132.00 N89-12'22"W N C O O W - 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00122,00 2, 5 �Z N Z o 0 7 0o N m 325 3Z3 _4 31�I-"-, �f- %4 �O't N t0 N ^ p g o p o 3 74.00{ g 0 J a e e Q c In _ 1D g N m O � A r n A r Q � � 3 N Q - .465432 i - A 74.00 N 22-002 00 22 D0 2200- - y - Loe N 41'50"E O N N N132.00 N e9• O M .a 74.001Dgj - O a .N 83' 74 N IV., _ M ~ N �NB "41'50"E N ;0 32.00 NEj73Z-� y 14167 N86-0442"E _ _ 74.00 _ 3. 5 3Z� N o w /(gyp o(/��N89'4t5Q0'E o W o 0 74.00 _ $m W In V/ W N 1 7 \(.. Np O I � -4 74.00 8 m 13 74. �f o Z c L() o p 1�^J1 N y O N _m N 3\4 N 10 n - ,��O Z 0. �•�- N rn ? 0) �o $ 74.00_ N m m�.m 10 O Np 74 00 0 0 2 O _4 '� �nl O O .335 N O 0. .� I 74,00 O m O �Z rn N O 74.00 0 D N N m 0 1 1 I O I 337 N _ m ri 44,o- b �� ll N 74.00 n' s N83- E �„y N - ti ON 88-41'50"E cr -N:-d3�a L G t m O � 3Zo N` '/ � O O �`� O . N \J / � f�. V � J� N W N �4 OCA L. �" �f b _ i.l C1C p_> J po M tiZ Lac c+vN M 5-,2 L,c_oo f-4 � yz� 8 Z�4 �QgNL o0'!7 ��.�9? bbd Z-x.90 "P's F2'��h O MLZLEOON to 1 �1 tj M fe't�•r'��N C J C Al J M L-47-�J 1,1 N � 9 So ��4 pp QO (-I Sri.z W U r J,IA J Lr, N t,o °� N -, N Y Mol.5�.� SSo�1 N osN Q 2 � � ul ,9. �� b � Z � 1Q .22 �•7 Ao SZ ?j -- M b�01�•Z N - M b.y.l,tom Tl f A :� �1—VZ Iia. 41 3.I`b.S'2 w' P 3 rj, i _ Ld , zz Z1es LA p V ? I I L'73.5 1 L' LJ Al rA IL a z N ti ➢ �.0 1 .3 l ul I 1-zzs-��.�..;-^��` _ �,_�•ozl_i z.o-oll _� L__►-_�a3' y� WI :... - �: S$•S orz .' . .-_ 1 'bZ.`csis c� -- _ r h Q � p 0 Iry =..z yg ? ,11 " V y O� d 1 - S b• 1 a, �s_S,[7i Lj _~ A l� 3�V1IM- E 40.. oo' n- - - �� o =�1e122Z:� MCf2L600N Z(zLO78.p 3`LI ' 2S.�a -. -'ZZ-SI _ SZ'�7ty, 'v y Farm I.u.MiA—LAND Q.Aa61 PICATIOA.— j��^ nar.-,n+er�a Has CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY BOARD OF CLASSIFICATION OF FORFEITED LANDS AS PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 386,LAWS 1935 AS AMENDED. j Town To the Viliage Board of the.................._......C�1y.__—.—___. ..._......of.............Shakopee......_........._.._.City __.... . Tre, the members of the County Board of the County have beof..............._.. Scott .............................................. Afinneaen classifiedota, do Item certify that the parcels of land)uni.nafter listed ane all of the larule wluo7i ur�>�on on-conservation lands,from tlu lirt of lands forfeited to the State of afinnesota for non-payment Of t,.,m for the year or years.___..___. 1976 Provided by Minnesota Statutes 1945,Section 252.01, as amended. i SIIBDIVISION SO or l B poor IYe I Appraised Value i Appraised Value 1 of Lacd of Timber E 71 of N 1301 j 9 209 800 00 Leremandis Addn. � I i Outlot 1 100 00 Lij Cletus Link Addn ND ANO OTHERS I, � j i ! j j I I J j 1 1 j i I i I / J .tea. lam - IMS A 1 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Industrial Development Bond Entitlement Issuers DATE: March 8 , 1985 Introduction The Shakopee City Council , at its regular March 5 , 1985 meeting , passed a resolution setting a public hearing to consider a prelim- inary resolution authorizing $2,000,000 in industrial development bonds for a Super 8 Motel project. At that meeting , Council discussed several issues concerning Shakopee ' s $2 . 6 million entitlement allocation and potential ways to manage the use of that allocation. Present Industri a1- Dever opment- Bond - Environment Representative Schriber, Minnesota House Tax Committee Chairman, has introduced a bill that will make sweeping changes in the present industrial development bond statute. The changes include the elimination of an entitlement category of issuers and will place all cities in one pool . Monies from the new pool will be distributed according to the following priorities: Industrial developments, environmental and pollution projects, redevelopment projects , and finally commercial projects. There is no description of how or when pool monies would be made available to these various development categories . It is expected by officials at the League of Cities following this issue , and Richard Nadeau from the State who administeres the program, that the Schriber bill will pass and become law within 30 to 60 days. I have phoned the cities underlined on the attached listing of 1985 entitlement issuers to ask them if they had entitlement they might share with Shakopee . Becker and Silver Bay have allocated all their entitlement and Minnetonka will probably wait until July before it releases unused portions of its entitle- ment. Currently Minnetonka has $5 .5 million in IDB development pending. Finally, I think Council should know that the pool for non-entitle- ment cities has also been used up for 1985 . This means that as soon as Shakopee allocates its $2.6 million in IDB entitlement we will only get additional IDB capacity if we can secure it from other entitlement--_ssuers on the attached list. And, given - - — - that the non-entitlement pool is already allocated , most entitlement - cities will probably sit tight until this summer before they share any of their entitlement with other cities. Possible Criteria for Screening IDB Applications The City of Shakopee can simply refuse any given IDB application and/or can establish criteria for the allocation of entitlement IDBs . These criteria would have to be applied to all applicants and could take several forms. One form could be to limit the entitlement dollars to a specified type of development such as is being proposed by Representative Schriber ( note four development types listed above) . The City would have to attach to this some set of timing devices that would indicate when entitlement IDBS would become available for the various types of development. A second approach would be to development a ratio of dollars invested to jobs created . This approach could be applied to all applications as the sole criteria . Under this approach Council would have to establish a minimum acceptable level such as one job per $5 ,000 in IDBS or one job per $10 ,000 in IDBs. Then when Council approved a particular preliminary application it could indicate to the applicant that should a new application come in with a higher ratio of jobs to IBDs dollars that the earlier applicant might to bumped. A third approach would be to require a minimum level of equity participation in any IDB project. Such a minimum could be set from 10-25% . Since it is within the authority of the Council to say no to any particular applicant, Council should decide under what circum- stances it wishes to say no by applying some criteria to establish overall fairness and consistency. There are probably other ways to approach the screening of IDB entitlement applications and those can be discussed at the Council meeting. Alternatives 1 . Establish a screening criteria for IDB entitlement applications based upon the type of development. 2. Establish IDB entitlement application screening criteria based upon some ratic of jobs created to IDB dollars requested . 3 . Develop a criteria based on a combination of alternative No. 1 and 2 above. 4 . Establish a minimum equity requirement for all IDB funded projects. 5 . Reserve the entitlement for a specific development area e.g. downtown redevelopment. 6 . Keep the present first-come, first-serve IDB policy. Recommendation Because it is likely the Bill Schriber bill to change the current IDB allocation procedures will be approved in some form, I recommend alternative No. 6 . I do not believe that we have much to gain by establishing detailed application criteria unless we plan to apply them to the application currently before Council . The reason that I am making this recommendation is that there would only be approximately $500 ,000 remaining in Shakopee IDB entitlement and I do not know if it is worth establishing criteria for such a small amount of IDB entitlement. Action ReouesteL Pass a motion reaffirming Council ' s position to continue issuing industrial development bonds on a first-come, first-serve basis. JKA/jms 1985 EN71TLEMENT ISSUERS Issuer A I location Issuer Allocation Albert Lea 2,822,091 M,anrato 3,93 ,187 Alexandria 5928,436 Maple Grove 51,767,242 Apple Valley 53,139,191 Maplewood 55,320,963 Austin 51,743,989 Mendota Heights 53,143,408 Baxter 5668,001 Minneapolis 549,466,317 Becker S 3 168 629 MinnetonkaS'3 45 860 Beltrami County 51,691,141 Montevideo 5781,096 Blaine 52,647,692 Moorhead 8956,974 Bloomington 510,871,922 New Brighton S2,060,444 Brainerd 51,693,255 New Hope 51,945,869 Brooklyn Center 57,240,197 New Prague 51,442,765 r Brooklyn Park 55,097,733 New Uim 5835,001 Burnsville 511,712,841 Owatonna Cambridge S2,600,129 5993,545 Cannon Falls Park Rapids S1,247,216 51,049,564Pipeston Chanhassen $687,026 Piymouthe 5813,862 Cloquet 51,940,584 52,967,952 Columbia Heights $3,385,453 Princeton 5724,020 . Proctor 54,205, Coon Rapids- 54,344,118 713 . 9 Cottage Grove 52,018,800 Red Wing- 52,752,901 Richield $3,646,522 Dawson 51,198,596 Rochester Duluth 511,016,725 $2,536,066 Eagan 510,012,399- Rogers $881,507 East Grand Forks 51,162,659 Rosemount 54,800,726 East Gull Lake 5739,874 Saint Cloud 54,618,928. Eden Prairie 5o Saint Louis Park 52,830,547 10,342,948 Saint Paul 588,906,021 Eveleth S898,419 Sartell Fairmont 52,959,496 Sauk Rapids x,566,080 i Faribault 51,870,825 Savage p 5855,083 Farmington S643,690 - S1.269,413 9 Fergus Falls 52,600,12 ISorevie 52 5gg 0_15! 'r Shoreview 51,476,577 FridleySilver Bay 58,228,457 SZfi 424 075 Golden Valley S2 784 041 South Saint Paul i Grand Rapids 51,025,254 Springfield 5-,678,457 Hastings 5940,697 Stillwater ,5072'228 Hibbing 5761,013 5-,703,0'_3. . Hopkins -01,962,780 Vaite P Heights 52,045,223 Hutchinson 52,51 Waite Park 51,384,622 2,401 West Saint� Paul Lakeville 53,430,902 e 5830,773- WhitBear Lake �� o Le Sueur 52,435,666 .'_,814,6.,3. Little Canada Si i Willmar 52,087,925 _,_96,482 Winona Long Prairie 53,755,390 5782, 53 Woodbury Luverne 5739874 5981.919 7c:als b420, 80,000 CERTIFICATION OF ENTITLEMENT ALLOCATIONS I, the undersigned, am the Deputy Commissioner ofthe Der and Economic Development and hereby certify under partmen� of Energy allocations of issuance authority for industrial development of perjury that the entitlement issuers for the calenda^ 1 prneade in bonds awarded to on- sideration of any bribe, gratuity, ordirectwere contribution to any Political campaion. Date: January 2, 1985 Ec;waro J. Meyer, Deputy Commissioner of Financial Management C =.TY OF --SH�4KQP � INCORPORATED 1870 * ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 129 E. 1st Avenue - Shakopee, linnesota 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650 MEMO TO: Jahn K. Anderson, City Adminis r FROM: H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer SUBJECT: Executing Easement Agreement with Chicago & Northwestern T a ,\ rtation Company DATE: March 819 1985 INTRODUCTION: Attached are agreements from the Chicago & Northwestern Trans- portation Company that provide the right-of-way necessary for construction of Shenandoah Drive. BACKGROUND: This agreement has been reviewed by the assistant City Attorney and approved for execution. The draft form of this agreement was previously approved by City Council and the cost of the easement will be $12, 000. 00. The action requested i s to a ut h- oriZe the proper City officials to execute the agreement, and to pay the Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Company by cashiers or certified check the amount of s12, 000. 00. ACTION REQUESTED: A motion to direct proper City officials to execute an easement deed with the Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Company for ars 80 foot wide easement across the Railroad Company' s real estate situated in the City of Shakopee and the City will draw a cashiers or certified check in the amount of $12, 000. 00 in favor of the Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Company in consideration of the grant of the easement. HRS/pmp CHECKEAS CHICAGO AND9971RAWSPOR7ATION COMPANY REAL ESTATE AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DIRECT DIAL NUMBER (312) 559-6191 February 6 , 1985 REF : BML- 1710-23 U . S. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED: H . R . Spurrier C;, City City of Shakopee _ 129 East First Avenue South Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Re: Agreement for 44 Foot Wide Private / w Roadway Crossing and Underground Private Utility Easement Dear Mr. Spurrier: The above- ref eby the Transportatced offer to ionpurchase Company. Enclosed estate s a draft been acceptedy of the easement deed we propose to issue. Pursuant to Paragraph 2 of the contract. , we request that you notify us within 15 days of the receipt of this letter if there is to be any change in the name of the Grantee as it appears on the draft . Al so, we wi 11 requi re w' thi n 30 days f rom the date of thi s 1 et- ter, the sum of $12 , 000 .00 , which is the balance of the purchase price due under the contract . Payment must be made by cashier ' s or certified check . Any payment not in this form 7771—o e returnee for certification. The check should be made out to the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company and sent to the undersigned. As soon as we receive the remainder of the purchase price , we will execute and forward the original deed to you . If you have any questions regarding this transaction please call . Very truly yours , ernade e `N;. Logu67 Closing Officer Authorization No. EASEMENT DEED Me. THE GRANTOR, CHICAGO AN() NORTH aESTERN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation. whose principal office is located at Ifs f:. Canal Street, Chicago, Illinois, for the consideration of TWELVE THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS (312,000.00), grants unto the CITY OF SHAKOPEE. GRANTEE, an easement for roaeway and utility purposes and for no other reason whatsoever over and across the following described real estate situated in the City of Shakopee. County of Scott, and the. State of Vinnesotb, to wit: A strip of land 80.00 feet in width lying $0.00 feet Westerly and 30.00 feet Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the South line of said South- east Quarter of the Northwest Ouarter distant 16.00 feet west of the Southeast corner of said Southeast Ouarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence Northerly parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 175.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along a tangen- tial curve concave to the West, having a radius of 637.76 feet, a central angle of 50 degrees, 23 minutes, 03 seconds, an arc length of 560.83 feet; thence Northwesterly tangent to said curve a distance of 578.45 feet; thence Northerly along a tangential curve concave to the Est, having a radius of 786.21 feet, a central angle of 41 degrees, 46 minutes, 18 seconds, an arc length of 573.19 feet to the Southerly right- of-way line of said Railroad, the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence Northerly tangent to said last described curve a distance of 100.00 feet more or less to the Northerly right-of-way line of said railroad and there terrinatiny. Excepting and Reserving, however, unto the Grantor, its lessees. licensees, successors and assigns, the right to continue to protect. maintain, operate. and use any and all existing drainage, driveways, conduits. sewers, water mains, gas lines, electric power lines. communication lines, wires and other utilities. and easements of any kind whatsoever on said premises, including the repair, reconstruc- tion and replacement thereof. Reservingg. however, unto the Grantor the right to construct, raintrin. use, operate, relocate, reconstruct ane rrrr.ew such tracks and facilities as it may at any tire, and from time to time. desire within the lif! EkSENENT i;EE. U. Anthorization No. keservinq further, however, unto the Grantor, its successors ano assigns. the unrestricted right at any tine to add tracks or relo- cate tracks across said public road and further, the right to excavate. at any tire. for pipes, conduits, culverts, drains or other works within, the easement area necessary or convenient to the operation of the Grantor. its successors and assiyhs, or as apportioned by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Its successors. Ry the acceptance of this conveyance, Grantee, its successors and assigns. agrees that so long as said real estate or any part thereof remains open for public travel. it shall maintain the road and keep it and the roadway easement area adjacent to it free and clear of all brush or undergrowth or any other obstacles that would tend to intercept and/or obstruct the view of the• tracks for a distance extend- ing the full width of the Grantor's right of way and for a distance on each side of said crossing in coyplifonce with enacted end future f'innesota Statutory requirenents. It is hereby expressly provided that the Grantor shall not be put to any expense in and about the cost of acquiring. constructing. grading, paving. or other things necesi.ary or expedient for the in- provenent, maintenance, or use of said described reel estate or any part thereof as a street or highway; and if any special tax or assess- hent shall he levied or assessed against the real estate of the Grantor for all or any of the purposes aforesaid, the Grantee by its acceptance hereof hereby assumes and agrees to pay ttie sane. DATED this day of Iu__ Signed. Sealed and Delivered in CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN Presence of: TRANSPORTATION, COMPANY P vice Presiuent Attest Secretary Paye ? of 3 Papes N N F N M -.1�: • N } N N A } ,V r N • N NN N N N N N N S ')= C' R C: C- } LD c } L s ['. } C L C O)'.L_ C..:, c m J+ z Ic O. { } u. } V } • C �/; r r } w • 1JN NJ NNN N :7 w lr,V1 r �, } -+ } :,: } -• * r W • P • P } O G P O P P P P V+ x Cl I z -4 0 < • j v 0 n 4:W W w w W WW wW wwW W Ww W -r ww w W Www L.L . v+ A ou Go co ,a m oo w m - ,p x w m co m x:x oc oo m - -u ui I )s i I :i r W� IPP a:O, 110 10 W,W •W W N m r !N N Co r -Q-P m-+j l-'��I a1o• - ., �rn oo .o-.o oo;oo r rl .r r i oo w ao oolr.1 w.r�l ,00 uo im cc 1 - L)it7 J Jt SCA 0, JO I,tv w v v a it r In VI` iN N Ott? O O+ iNN l:�'O �I'V N N! 'r r N N W O'N P O m 'V V {7 of n�a b D rr! o xl zcccccccc N a Y•` 17 - (Y• O! -C :r -) ti'^•i --1 Q s' n Ir l-In, a z z ; . ,0 0 0 0 o:ooo r v,vi n{ c ! :V) Iv c :n "l x n rl fq f-I o :z I A a" { • ; !G G9i� O .0 I { :z z 2:Z 2 2: Z -v ;U N A) !' � �'1--1; � .vl '1'1 i O ( :D D )+ a'D b;D a ( '1•, r7 �. G7 0: I -2. - V �', 'Cn Vi V)!V'r 4.f4:1n V- 0 O c c cic C C c v 1 Iy r n I i vvv,vz,rovv :rrrirrrif-r m to Nj z { + 1 V) 10 icn -r! M m mim w tWfn Cn cal rl 1 to �+ I c is Ic m! ; tO0OI'D cc..cc m + ro'i)! z IC I >a C o Iro r D C C C.0 ro 1 -0'C) c ro-vj I r+ ci -n iro ro j I-,; c r H HiH V"0"D ro m rr to y fai .> I r r c vvrororrrr ro I m m: *,� - f*1 '.m Y+1 rl - !2 3 =,:z m rq'm m 1t S `f T1 { (Al v,; 4 1a Q• ;Cr. iN W ' :a_a a:n to Vi;(n to i b 4n rt•• I 3 � i i i VI. n I cn I :.> Z zi2 O we Vl. N i0• Pa P•:Po pp .M ro 0 B -D' j .D OO O O O clO_O O O O Y rr r :r r r r r r. r rrr.rrrrr r o _ N N W IV W N N N W W w N N'N N N N W N c _..�.. Do N - w w w�w-• -�-+-• w 2 0 0 O N O V, •O O -• J N N N N 0 0 0 0 N o -w a,+ w_ r w w w_ r r w=w r r r r a yl', 'N W—r W N N IN O .P r—N .0 J r. 04 P •+ r V,-. �• r IV ,r :N N -.fV r W:_a r N N N N .2 i N 99 w w 6 w DO ,tt V, r� 'v v) D } s rt rt } rt } • C'; Cr • • 4 r } } R } D f-1 x 71 x x x O w .7 • >,-; R L .-J(7)-C)O J f C-O'] * J O Ci O c. R v� h R IV w N N • N N h h N N IV h h N • N NNN N rt h • N N h h rt 2 00 s w r R ww w ww WwwwwwwW • .+ _. � ♦ s - . R r, r • v rt rr s c r_c c.c. c ,�c c_ c • v,vl�.r �, • �, rt NNN � w � '� •1 n r, n w Vi W W W w W W W-w W W W W W W w W W W W W W H Vi _ J W W W W W W w W W W W w.W In W w W W W W W W W w r.A KD 00 00 OD 00 UO 7D 00 W,:tl tD m 00 00 00(D M OC 'OD w 00:tl!D JO V,S Vt Vi Vt V1 Vn N v W ✓1 1.0)%A 'n ,V1 Vf' VI Ir V. - M i rr� .. ww N 1 W �VIrO; Otr� r7V.+gyp V'V WWF "VPPV j-�O 00 50 V N. +N r_7�A—r W.+' N N,r w V•0 00;;D O O; r V V Ir - rt • • 1 • • j i :• • • + • • .• • • • • • • • • + • N • J IN c?:_)1 :1..1�0 :0 CJ N'W OO W•r V1 VI.WJ I CSN rr VI P;,T WW,' ;x/10 DV -4:-4 L4 o o! r r o: -+ 0 00 0 4-.C) o v)r C.O W P a Vt W v v P v1 Vi.P 6n ! O I 1 M M' mm00000'00000 n Don x'1 t7 n 0:n .0 f r Yj i.D! C CCC CCCCCC s • G K. p 0:7 p ' ZIZ :a2 zZ2Z2 S 2 ST 3 N� V 7)b Z I z z2z z Z.C2z • It • + 'Z < < ?>� I _ T 71 f 2 �Z.:z�C 2 i.z t n 7 • * �u G`l 6l G).u7 Qt C Ifi7 O it D D A ?A b. C vOt rnNNIn41Nt;/1NV)In wro.jA CCC C Z -4 V) 0OU0000000 v v o moi+ < cs (1)v, = =ecce==z= rrrr o v c mM r,r)mrnrcl>71+imrlrt ecce :A HHH ;�• C Z2 - • • r • • + • • • • y3x'.Y _Yn - zZz n Mmrn m .m x M1.1 D M M iW O N.iV)(n G)-In Vi S m IMO 1`t rt y z tJJ. kn >~ 0 01 ocr-I-c:ccccc r- r- n 0 MMIC ccOov D� Dv� 000-0 C m r .Z)�, •-y H „y•_I"0 .-0 [ � f -oma rrrrrr r xT- -t HH Ha 2 3 H � NH H i x in, x33amr^mMMr*1 to aAsrl Y CC )- 6-1H VA to 0000 � H rrDtn m m' H H Z Z N All fJS •-i -/2 2 ?t �1 -4-4 aR w a• po j lu A r r x z ,. m cc mM. z �; to D mw vv m rl s 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +o 0,-) ZD � J,J r �r J ..•J J J� J.i� � 9 n►` r rr rrrrrlrrrrr rrrr N N N N 7v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NJ C N6- NN' V,W W w�+.�...c r rr W W W W W- 00(Dr .— _-- Iv rv00000000 OOOD N N OOD O •-1 w �I rr`' P WAj N ri NJ W N NN N ! N W N N�W N N ry LA ri rrlt I/ 1 P6N 0,0,OP jW W W��.Ol W Wi N wwlr W N N: N N N O O r V N N w N N p}t A N _ r 1 V C] W n w co u �r1 3 * rt r 4 ► a r) R cf x 0 In x A A O ♦ r:: 7 G w C. • Cu C. CGcZ -� - -U a • C:J N R N N N N R n N r. R N N N N N iV rV N. N N_h N w N R N ► y m N: ■ N A N iv • J f•_h w N N N N N N N N • w � ♦ -' m P r * V N V \n R + rrrrrrrr R P v n r ♦ a 7C 7 M • U O T W W W W w w W W w W.W W W.w W W W W W W W LN 1 V: ri W W w W W W w w W W W w W W W w W w W w W - A 00 00 a 0n.X, 00 m 00 a W ao 0c 00 00.00 00 cc ,7o a 00 00 jo -O \r ✓t. v�' - v; U•uI v,ut\n\n Ur\n u! \n + 1J)N; 'P W N-• r.-• N P cT N N'N w; V r N N N 'r r ut w W O N', J W-!PPP;P N•O; W w 10 N N S P O, ut'A I W V z))tai v1 O:J1 U P P w.u W +0:00 .0 N; !•) �+�• W W! .,O •O a ? N O0' 'V 0p'V U. o:0 GJO� '.a0 VPPUt\n'A-.0 PI -•P W NN+ w\n 0 L W 3 i I I I I 1 f f I � '• y 111 I ! j ( , .r: c- c:« :x x x'x x x:x x x m c)- cls �I m ri n n ID b Y i p pi Ill -. •'\ I- x! v ofo o I z z Z; �o z A�:m z z� ro ro` z X-! i •m-c -c< :zzzzx:axxxas xx 1.1• m r f'"'9 irl; a u�o u o:o o 6.0 c Z LIZ ZZ ou V A. a I T ?1•i C C u)m 0) (n w.an y in N+n r s N x.x x ...,., x x'x x x'x x s; 1.1 i1('{f•1 _\)\!l) l:)UAt lJ L U Q U, A�► 6 JC I.cl mf'l mmmmmm. mm i*). N 2 x x'z 2 z'x z 2' ! x�- • I i napana,nf zcc inn- 0 f z�zzz.zza � ro ro M u)"0 m ill w m m;0:O m Sm 0 N W x N m O f i-1 1 ©ia 1 r r'r c :C CO` C C 10 0 0 0'D ll N -1 G ; ri j 3A rn 1 Z I C -n-n;,u-n . H a)� W H IG;a)G)la)-0 roO I !-1; N ••i, II r {{ -0 v v-ur r r l X r 'V _ 'rn 0(n:"of I 3! X x 3 H H, .-�: at 'r � C.' ao! mMIM m :9 3. aanna:amrn. Tm a'' I m 14n I C C- C f ...y M - M M'+'z z:� at R', A �fn -1 rl m m rr' c -1 v1, rov d Q -+0 .O_O C) O_O'O_O O J C?\? O0 r r r-r r - 41 -91 r A 11 A r r4 r r r r r r r o N N N' - N N'N N N N N N N N N W W C W W W W W.W W W W r r N r W O 0 0 0 0 - N N O. N N 0 6 0 0 0 0 N O N O �0 P! lrl W p.[ r�.�0,r W W N W A.r� l,+'••\'A - I\) 00 00 a N N "'\r N N O ...N W r r N N N N-.-• N r ,r i .• 1 ! 1 '1 1 ► 1 f l \ i f 1 j 1 i 1 ! f i 1 1 w r)r.r P W P L.w e0•r 0l r w r w W W .. N. W 41 P-�+ N N N-!'N Or,00=W iv N. -+r N N :2 U 1.4 00 R N a t') A • s : w w 'R L1 i. R - ► R. • s • R D f•1 n c7 n n n n x x x x u, V # V ■ V V ♦ r » D # ;�U + O U L CLL * # W a N * A N # - A • N * N N N I V 1 V N N ! N N N N ! 'c N N • _ # W W # W + A • A A # N A N N n;A A # N N N N - • f N # lv # • C" C # `. • ,O • w- Cr: # V V V -4 P # P P P P ► f7 # w ► V • W w • • c_ * tJ)VI # J C.- - _ `O ! V V\ ! 7C Z7 H Lq 2 y O < • G �- W W Wir) W W W W W W w W W W W W W y G; W Wi. W W W W -W W W W W W'w W W \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ :)o J0 Ixuo cA uo:a :.c x 00 00'jo.)o Oo a 00 W An �n VI ,II 111 V1 ✓1 Un VI V7 r; m O IN 41 + • N r r i A i N w .p P"T 'o ffI ! '• • j N• i • • ;• •- f :J1+N N :.r A W.w W N` .O,O: „O,Q O N V1 O O: C)O O A O O O tO C,Vl I O O N 0 w CD 4'N 0 IIF i • ! M'. i * :♦ ( # * � * �* I I I t I I r M r r '7C A x'7C 7c x 0 1i -UM ::XzMl o A 'n Z':2 I n� n W :n aa:Dna� MMM:"I O 7C 7C D 1 O - JC H N Ln.V)In V) rl r W N Vl V)V)to! V) L 14 1-1 ill r1 r11 AA) C ]yn z3[x -C z mrl 1.11.11111., n NV)cn (n z L H p 111!tel-.,1"1 fTl 1 W V)�V) V) U j rv;uA.u ;u;a r I yo `^ �] a Lao ny1 DDDo n rrrrrr: n i X- any In(A In Nin .l).'O-erA " 1 i ' -•1 -4-41-4 y y D O'O p 'z) M i I m m m TI M M. t H Z Z j Vh m In ` A+ r C I C C i z I 2 11 m 'tl-D '13-0 'L Z7 N, M m111 m ,H f O f '9 ti� i •ti: En - ID C w �70=fib C d/ti1CD --1 - -0-0 I H H 0 C)0:O O C:C C I C M r r,r- Z a TT�TT�t 0 HHRH i 3 2' fF .� ►� H m n mm v)N V)"1.7 Vi z a 'O M D x mmmmmm m 3c :c G f+l cn ti in c r) n n z;o ;D M W to a a n n m m 1n I y H H CC CC CC: HH HH fi i T W tF Q•Q•'.R LR .y i �I 1.1 fel Mm Mrq O vv -o .D Z JIV NNNO G OG.j4 p V W w w +• ,i• r r r r i l l l l l N N rr �rrrrr: r1 rrrr tW W �� - `0 w N N W W W W W N N N N N C 10 C) - O O r O N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W W'w w 1 1 •• 1 1 N.N N N i t jN P VI v1 In tv Psi ' O 1 i -IJ 4" 41 t,GrI N i NV co oo Up, P 01 r C OD 00 V a O . OD 00 p W I" w I-)o _0 t • ! fJ W # i a en - S V) In V) w x x ;K X J O:7 'J O _7 ► C. • ,J•.-� r] _7 U O.-) ."] "J 7_3_ V V V V V V y V y y y V _11l V -1 ■ y y y V y V V \V y V V y • V 1 4 V f7 C N NNN NN N NN NN NNN N ■ N ■ NN NN r'_r,Ih N NN NN ■ NN ■ Iv S cA 1•w w W w W,w W w w w w w w w ► IN • w W w w w W w w w w w w ■ w In w w 1.1 VI r r r r r r r r r r r r 4' r r ► r • W w w w N W w w W W W W • w W w w f> x yy PPP PP PP PPP P rt l+ rt y� yyy v � yyvyy w rr • �+ �[ n -'1 i O O TI L]-.OG L -:c C- 1- L:)C_ f OOC OCG OG ,:? 7 ..1 ). W W.W W W W W W w w w W W.W W w W W W w W W W W W W y Ui ri X W www w w w W w w w w W W w w w w w w w w w.w w Www w w W T. C` n comm mcnmmma0Wmmm a n maxx xws00 01or00 cboo Go v V1 N n Jt lj� '-n V0 VI V. A .n v1 VI vl S'n�n'n \n vn V1 Vi :111✓1 V) �.. n w w: , .� ,W •OPt]•OP[Mi(+'. •WWm•�NaIr P iv7 +••iN•N ,.r P :41 to W.w i Nr A-4-r�y•r:r A' ,r P LN ...W,n •WcQ'rw•tO •�0!�i•r IN r m %.n;00 vP_NOO• ,C%V)QO 'O PN •- • • N 1• • OfO•W • • m ♦ • • Ir r*J0 •O N -'01•30'0 Ins 0_ . _1 - I N P'.T 1O••'•.�W V1 vl r riy r P!"'to PSP L�I+ O Vn V)C) iW r owt C) 0•%A]D Oita-4 ;V!VI 01:0.. l W M M CJ O O-4 N y"'�4110.O y%O-4 00 00 i 1 I t 3i 3'23 a3'323.33 af3Z 3 j r 3332335'3 33;33 -01 O:u O O 00 Q, O:O O 010 O - 1'1 I C - M M M..4,H H H.r . - -1 -1-11-1-1 -4-4-1 -4 ; 7 Z Z Z Z.2 z Z,z z zit z y! 1 !• • O O'o O O':O O :v �' z 2 Z z z z z z z 2.0 z •z z 'O -• -4,-y•54 .0,u,:v.0.0-,u N„u A) o V) m rn m 1.1 rn in m r1 rn m'm m In v'ln9 VI - - G7.0 GAG) G):4>G) --4 r-I-t- w v-0-V v m Z7 -0 _v 'U U) 'm a n n a D D a.)•a n�D a :xo a / 1 / a a'D.1. X. a),D:D D a -r N N iA V):N N in in U) (n✓l(n 'r r `T O ;o (>:C)0 x 1:m M A ;U:w m r - 'm 0 0 n M 0 C'C)Cl r) n 0 r r 'H -0 -1•-1-f-4 -4-1 -1•-1 ti 1'1 [) U V J O:J O O J O U'.C7 O -1'I 1'1 "•Y .N - i ; - u- S -1 - ♦-1 1 r I -1v V$ ;V) m CD n tc 1 ( e rn IA P _u rn.07¢ m I,l�m rn m m[o N IV)(n ' T ,O r)0 C C'C C C C C CIC C IC C - c r r c D 1z o o:0 C C iC C r D,x -1-1-4 -1-1.N--1__4 -i '-1-1 T4 -i H C.cc CC:CCC;C•V 'U'-U V H .O zZMMrMMHw1MM:►iM iMH kz =m z �-'� +n G) H H 4 ti M M" '1] ro'-o -0 z E I C 0:0 r r r r r r r r-r r it r- -4 -1; -o vvrov-u-or rIrr -+ - rl'.m MMSHM MHMW:411W �I'•+H i1 ! _ ':3 ;g 1�M a-•!H ' '3 ( S::V -1-4-4-•-i 4• 3;D b 33;332"3 m m'mm W 1 y MM—M HM MM+rM ywM rl - a«,M D a;> aa.n In In'InN j M MMri m'm rnrn In ri ri mm `r1 ri H IV, M;2 2 i �+W w M.•ti"-! 'G f - Z:2 GI)N kn N N iN N N,(n N ;In In `CS IQo W W:QC 1 y W rn' mmr)mrnm z V'0 _0 - O OOO 00 0O6 ] JOOOoOOO- .OO JO 'm n 1>. 1 1 '{ 1 1 1 'i 1 { { { i '1 { I I l • 1 1 '{ { 1 1 { 1 1 1 1 { t f> r 414141 4141.414141:4141414141 r r rrrr.rrr.rrr.rr 4141 r o W IV N N N N N N fu N)N N'IN N W N 'o10 W W W W W W W W'W W W W C VI WW W W W:W W W W -+ -+ In W N'N V y y y-4 V V V y y -V y 'N -" O N.0 0 N NN N N N P P d 0 0 0 0 0 O O'0 C) - 'd O -P -•1 11 • 1 f :1 1 11 1 1 '..1 1 1 { ' 13 1 1i e 1 1 1 1 it 'I 1 '1 ter-+ Pr�rrw-.o• P.rr 'o r aoar.rrwwww-+-+ •rw :c:) .a W P'N OD W N TO O C)N N N N%A PN—cow - rr r(I,r..•N�w y.-.P O-.ON y-4--.-a-.-a Nr V-• �O • 1 it ! ! 1 1 1 !1 • -/ 1 1 '1 I t .1 1 1 1 1 1i11 1 -+ r 01 41 141 r W-�P P;41 41 v7 r O'��>P r;r r W W W W NN)p0 N NN-�-�y N �41 N --� r :7'O N N:N N P M N•+!JO W 'N Vi .O :2 W N a ax v1 3 Tq T) (n � w rt . rt D m ■ • Gl 411 n 0 rt J r 7 O "7 � ':7 rt �O,7 ..]=G � ]G:� C ?:.]J C. ]^. :7'? _�b O ♦ .J rt _7 + '7 .+ rt \ R VV \ \\ • 'VV VV VV VV V\ VV �.111VV V'V VVV R '\ R v n :� • N » n n•N N N rt N N N N N N N N N N N N n:N N N N N N N N N * N • N w N x R • r w - rrrrr R w w W w w w w w w w w W.W U.W Wi,+W wwWw R W r W + W s P s • o: ;. a s , a r ; o rr U U c n U a a v C, n • In n + r n • � rt V1 V1171 V1 V1 + vv \\vvavrvv\vv V vvvvvvv + r * ry ♦ .o � c7 r 2 -1 • U z..l+J U O C Ct C•rl C O G.7/-_a.) G Cl r:),7 CC7 C t7 O -1 W Www W W W W L%f-4- w iq W W W W Www W w W W _ W - W W ,.1 V• j ♦ J W - W W.,/ W W W L. w lii W w w w W M w W W W W W W IN w w W W W A I W W 'JO 00,A m m Oa [D OO m W Lo OO m m w m Jtl w w,.O Lv'JO to Op OD m m-(n jo M Op Z7 iJ1 �t VI VI 1A l/1 111 VI VI N:R N N VI VI Ji N N Vf VI VI V U,V1 N N In JI .n ,n •n f ; 11 s OO Oj O r r I 1 N i -+ : -� j N L7 N•O 1O W ru -4 P A W 0 M—'NNW A•W W A'W ,W A r (W LW N'N :b OO O:vl •O OD V r,a P •O P r W.�Oo •O W in W: N 10-C)W O!W w m ac,; to LV v V { r • s . • • • • • r • . • • • r • • w • • • • • w • • r • • s •-s r • . r { .Il VI i 1T;.J V�'a N -•10 W.n:r-+N'no V W•.w V N 'D V U11 +N +7v.p-O'N � O O! - �u u � U�u, .00 i V ?G V1OO W!W N LI.m O 41 4,P O:O CZ) 0,N P'Pr W r 0. Opi ;zJ Ov .{ I { I M .r ± • j �.Z Z Z,Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2.Z O Z Z=Z 2 ,r I -,tT 'T1T c CIL L W-ILc LjLCL=C iCSLL=L L.L r(' ! T O - _ m• '� •rMMM H ID O Co ca m.O lA mtD O mO mO:O7m mO m m0 I A. 1 a O 1�l'7 •1.7 til t'1'•I 1'1 .4 1.11.1 in f•11.1 1.1 1.1 11 1'l 1.1;n V) y _ r 1!+l in 11 I n rrr'rrr r r r r-r r r r r r r r r r r r � r-rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr � n ;2 v o evvv c x o 17 L f'I uvuocJC3 y r ccccc p r = o nr)nC-)n 07 C) m i r�i x 1 I w 3 m [n !"1 L7 nl IIICn V! CJ O{b O O'O:J U IC)O:J:J { C I Y i•p IC C �v V rnv rt -q 1-4 v to f•I V V-4 V 11 'N V-J!!tii D 1 C 'D 'S1 17 C� m rV Pi N r N N N r r N IV N N N:N N N N N N N I i •"•�+�'+ rt) 'D + w.1 W m:w m w M+w rn r•t w w w w w w w w L4 W w•w 3 -n 'U r-rl_ :oo m V la'ro m Im a ro mm a m oc Oo Im(M m;m al+oo,w y { r m rr3mrn V VS'V2 V v-VxS V v-NVv VV-j-j'N'.JI/ p N aytw I 2: 2 Z� a NFTI . m rt z rn . rl c j C7O_O A O -+OOG O O p 0 00 00.7 O 00 O J O d OO O O b D - ..d�► •lJl J.J J J .d J J 0 0 0 C3 t r rrrrr -- :A r r r r r r.1.1141,r r r r 41 41 r r r r r r 4- &A W W'WWWWWwwWwWWWWWW/MWWW N N W C '•w 7V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N IV N IV N IV U r r NJ C) .�•.,•e r r�r r..•r r r .•r r�� N O O -1 -1'r r • 1 t r f t I r r 41,41w W.N ri . _ r �1NV W �NN—W WN i.R rm VVin inHW NN P D r �r r�.•r V V N : N • Nl i 7.1 r 'V ��� i Wt N Vlf .� .O N Nom+tr W IV r .r m V N N1 W V,w N N N v • 1 cA � to 3 1'i ro » * r V! I 4 • + w s r - V, ... 4 + r ; ` �► D m n r) r) 1 O• - i t.7 ► .7 ..)i 7CJ JO -r C, Z .D C::07 30 1O_:)0 • '.3O R '] .7 -+ _ N • h mN ANfl.N ► NN ► NNN m NN N A NrhN ► NN ► h • N 2 (_ u r uA %A • v P's v W%A�A vn'AunWu r rr ► r r v G r r '� V V V V y r OL ► W w W w W W W ti N N N N • �I ► r r x (l M Z � i) K • U U T r:-J '_7 rj -, r O C: 7 O: O C1 c Y W W w w W W W L. w t.r W W W w W W W W W W In w W W rl w w wwww�..w L4 W wwww Ll.114 wwwww 4A w W 7c Oo :m -m m 110 m m noo� (7o00 OD OD CA OD a7 0o m:n OC OC Oo go m x Do _ L VI eln ✓•V7 JS.,n W Vn - V Vt S v1 3l„V1 3.n.n V: VI ✓'N1 V;N V, In tr • m I10 �D :.r :w N' IN P P r ! N!N V'`0 c,All r P< IOo v !r-+ '�-•W.W IV +N W,N-�Vt I.O N W INN j WSW t ++ •O'O C -o r o:Lot Oo tn, tV m oo. :Jo Do�....po �O!.7o�+ :P •O�/1 OOt I01 �I Oo 1+0•O E . » . :. . . k. . , rr . . . . . t. . . ,. . . . . . . . Crr .J . i. V V1%A 7 .,—+;;T ,. CT'—�r ;ut�, d!.'J W U, I!J P r li..i 6W!W i O OIO VI;O O 0!,o Q V. tW Ou'n it W VI An P c.1;p N i0 J1%A 0 O O O u C - 40 G� %AW% I i 4 Rt 4► IR � ! � f !4 R f I ; V,CA N N V)V) V7 N tVI N w 0 I to 0 t (n W I X n I► C C C C C' C a I 3D- —1. n X.ib b b 3. J- A-- ! o a' t tm -4.4 A A 7C A-A A A x x x A 'y-•1 'V! QD V'U v U;V i7 . O'O U O V, x z= -u -0v101-0 -0 9v -0 -0 0 2 1 ,. mm 1-1m-17urif1.?1,1 m;30)r1 n V)U) rnmmrnm;mrl mmmIgr1l 1 S a d ,1 .1:-P -( 1V ,. :(n V,V, v000voO oED-w0 11 z n 2 C C C CAC C C.0 L ;o.:7O- 1);lD N ch ;D 'y) S w i2 CD m r rl in ri r•1 pi 1T1 rl U O O 00 z p C c . .. r• rl m I A OD W w w ! -f z z' "i'*t f rn !b ! I H Pi ! CD o }ss_cccc' f vro! Co W;Vt0V, :V, rnm'fri tvmrn mm f v) Id r r:C C a C C o 0 iO a a- ( a s 1 C oI ro -+1w.w►.w `«,: Gprororovro cC•Ccc' cc, I v o m L7 i�l m rt r it r r•. G).C)'m Tl -u m v ':u Puwiw....: -(-1 . 'r-r,r'rr ZTl roT)ro: 'U"U r M :..� Frl -4-4-4 ti- 1 i b Tl '.3(••)w'M.»w I Go QC m m r*t m z ►ti 117 - -m0 rl+rnmm t wbVl (A V)'N V) AD Z 'C -'-i L NiN N V)' Tl 2 w. 1 +^1 7 C c i H z. T 2.z z? - 2 7 '.T!m CC c 1 -y-4-i-(-t .ro.ro.-O.;O:0 .M.m O m rn'm m ri ri rl :z rororororo roro O :O co co 0 C_00 �(:J _.oO oo CO p - CO_.uo0 _o_O O r r WWJ Pr _ _ __ _ --- 1 () l f i t l t I I f t 1 - 1 1 1 1 r :r wwrrrr rr rrrrr.rr rrrrr 0 rr r r o N .W SOD OD W W W W W W N N N N 1V N N - N N'N N N N N N N C W .W W-1 V V11 WNI WW W W W WW p .O 'ry C)C)OO 00 0 0 0 0 0"OO NNNNN N N C7 .O .1 1 �! - '1 i f 'i 1 1 i lt l l l l t t • i t i t l ' - i i ( t N-•' r r P W W W OD "O Ch N`N NOD W W. r OD N N 41111 N w w"t-•- I N ILA :O O N V N N N N -+N - �• - t ! ;{ ,• f f :t 1. 1 1 1 I t 1 ,1 1 1 't - -� P Ir W- ' N-+ r,r r P W IW W _W r M N ;C,Ci N'N N00 I W w r OD•N N r N N N W'.N-�-� N-� 41 M r w 101 a +o ro OD 3 n ci ► - ► ► r - r w a rt I ' J • .7 • .7 7 R C3 ci N N R h rt h rt h N • h ■ N N N N N 4,11 N N • N • N N N N 6! • N R V` = b0 V1 • V1 • - ut V:N V VI V': v V'. • V' • NI VI V. In m P ■ V r lb '■ l ♦ W w M j • t`Nh fJN N N N % rt N N N N n N • V r N: rt 0 V V V P P Q P P • r r C (. C�C x n M J K • V W W w W w w w W W W w w W W-w W W W W W w W w W W W W w W"A W W vl W W 7C . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ G W 00 (70 (n - ..O(D(D W t. (D 00.00 i)C JO 00 OD;D ✓1 Vf An V1 V1 V1 V' - V'Vt ut ur tr lr Vf N V1 J+.yr An r AV i INN N :,7 0-0,0 ' UV�� !t •rAr:_ :W VY W:..1r �(. w�- • r 1 .•NA r.Nr:W:ifn •N� t.�•WN•NN•v•PP • i N 100 00.•%N7 :a IJi_ Ioz W r:•lJ y r C;)L3 baa .� .1 I C)Q' OCJI ca C) I .oN00'oi -4 -4 oo aooiao 1 C C -4 4) w y N w w N: w Q) U) fn-(o is • Al I I n n _ C C C C C C C:C - C, y-y y y "U ^�mrgirtIrn s an.aa • ' �) I 7o 11K, 19 m r1 r r r r T :u.0 x;a K o w:07 i In v,V) Ll Ill r (Awww wfn q n(7 i)n O In 3' o c o -077;10 M N H M M H rrr r ) m n Z J a 7c H )(I i i c .1Z c c S n n n () � w9) r x r :>>X. w w w w:(A M� 2 Z L 2 2 C K i in U) it{{ r Ar s-�w n1 r :9f I Z n rgT9mmfq G:p G 7C Op o 0w C I I ' ccccc V) f a I H M H H M (n C � = I C -4 ; om 3 x 00 1 V)CD N V kn fn W� m I t ' GO C C C cc C: ;7 a) a) x3 wt 2 [ Z7 ro n C ,.y-'Iroi roO ro ro-a -9 O0i 0 `m n -t 1 -d ro ! ro t .c -01 i o a)IG)C) :x 3. 2 En �' umi (rii Pe n TTm III ririm m� nava Illm w cn w:� H M:r H fn N :r Z 2 Z DC7 co rr y � -Iy ro - N P• Q.P. y y m cc z ro a a O 7O0 -+a QOC _O iJr-,GO41 - n r r r r +` +` r rrr rrrrr r rrrr o W W W NN W N -N N (14 N N N N N :V N I V:N N C W N N r W O O O O _ N -N N p O O O O O O O O a O y 1 '1 rw .tom W j+r .a C. N w r C. M NO—!CD 00 O �N—I WN-1 N-1 N. .1.r+rN f t 1 J i 1 :1 1 1 1 II 0 r r! ^) W r err r.1 O "'.+ j p.L4 •. 1` w r rain-1V N�Imw -• - N a w j 'C) -+ w ■ • i Oe st � 1 M r 1 r. JC 7C 7C 7C 7C 7C n (n rn n V) �,) v co N N N N N N -N IV N N N N N N h N N N • N s x K OL u Cc a Q O' Cw P: a a a no a Oo a OD a + P rt m VI Ic a v P v' r w n. J , �+ rt X r) H z .) K • O O ?1 -.L' W W W w w.W w w W W W w W W W w W W W w W 7C Oo X ao w ;n OD M:lo OD OD 0o OD Oe Oo no Y ilo Oc vi %VI ✓i Vl V, VI W V• W V lJ1 V1 1n N Vi . j j + W,W •Y I Jr IJJ IW V1 :rr v0; YiIII)rIj %A r. IO GtL04 L4 N OIPP1r U - P!P v,u � a ��)O ;JD 1,0 O ;CSO 6n%A Ww joO i'A'A j NN V INW .NlW Ll;""l uMU I )in !PT D,0, i?O:J 1O�.a -.IOV lrr Vv f IU 7 U ' !no oD ,0!— OiG ±O In vn - r r iO0 :G O iW If i0 Ll :o w •N W Ip[] AO O O;O r {t in � ►� r� {rt • `• ,',• (• '► Irt �rt rt rt rt: I r -. I , I 1 3 2'3 '3 IS 2 ( x 7 T C7 rl � i n o:>y Z +•+ ' G L D J ,.� r S n i n O ..m {� .'G U';u O '1 i I A7., C -4vl A 1 r r r v y) x x 1 s I -i ri w Vl 2 z:z O '-1 vl Z :n X m to a ri la 41 -4 O D n n Z D GJ m O 111'i 9`I iy '' r.+ S T Sri i i 1•I i .ty I.0 3' 3 f3 '.n - ••� y Vi T GL 3 Z v) r) m ri m O 2 i t 1 H C 3 111 -1 N a m 2 x 1 .Z7 71 ;11 L� -4 2 G7 ?7 1 O O ._ Z7 H ! m c, -v r 1 P v O ± C toIn A ;o Irl rim :N j r) k c -D AO Or f. V 1� �1 A z;m c r A i 0 c c c ( i a o!v. Vq c c c v z K n -o 0 o i Im r ± 17 -n i y T T G t ` i32 ri r,a-; V- I 1, ± r Z r r f vl a 3 3 m r m m n m sm 2 +•+ rl G7 T c ( r1 I T j _n v rn:cA {n -4 x r 'C7 m m wyy G'1 V,:v) H Po D• T ri m m Z U U V) o O Cl w J J J J .d 1y J W J rI 1 ) 11 ( ) 0 rrr r r r r r r r r r r r r r r o W W L4-L. W N 'N N N tv w P N W W N .W C -{+ W W x.N - ..p W W W w r .p J J r ... .p - W N 2 C� O O 0 [7 N C�.J N N G o N -+ O O O O r r w w r r r v w w w w w w N N I kA G O •... � j ,J - — — t j..,+ 44- W w N N 1 NIm •A c, vl r �Y1 LQ i w J i 'v a G Ln r r v w w A N 3 r, V y n in �C X in v, .■ .J JC, .-� G C: C-E: C C G -n --3o a -..j C f3 C, C. 6 • N N N N N N N N N N N N IV N N N N N N N I V N N N = r n * O: cc m O. m R O: G•.OG Q • N rl r.: IV f� N �r r r r ter.....•r +.+rr n • .r w w N C a.O O V P %.r 9 ut In V+N vt Vt VI VI V'. .r r 7C i7 -I J K O T W W W W W IN W W w W W W LN w W w w y v: w A W W w w w w w W .�! w w w w W W w w WN W W w -W W X c: P oo - w W W oo '.n o0 or:co a ao oC rD a 00 Q^Oo a 'oc Oo b ' ,� .n•.n In V1 VI Vl'j, Ln V1 .n 'A.n.n In•n .n Vn V+V 'n ln :V1•n 1`1 i VI rW W N :W r,.+N IW W .� r�'. N N! P N'O_A-A-+ V�l k4 A,OD -O G .+-+ N tV N 0.0" W NI', ..O O! N N' V NIN N N'N A N'N N N.W oa wwp w-o, o o v o Q0 A'-) aoo o.o; iri0 j1-' SIJ`P-,Cj •O!•O W•�W 1-j:moi'. iV v 'v •n '`.i _,.J U'p� NN� mL.; VIV V V"J V1 V'V Vf O IO O O W-•W t fA P'oo oojJ O IP U v,•n :-3 U 0 O O� WWI O O• oD.p;:1/00 t)O iOo P OD'OD OD oO;O ,"� .ti•=i I Ic I N CAI rn N Ifn to rn.tn N N'4✓N U):V) T T,.-n T -tt T T T a ';z z L .•f 2 S,S x=.X S x 2 2 S._ aC= I- cc, ;zz a v iz� c �: x I. c ��:x z z:t2 r2cz; to •rn rl 7C .o i - .... _ X I O O 10 G CU;;J O Ci U G O?'o D O p D D U D C7� P. D 7 j C t D I C z i Y• 'D' V I V V V b V -a M V V'V W N'N N.+-+-+ N r IC O�')f Z: N ra f'1 tj 1.`)ri`r'1 Q rl I_)r7 r,tr•1 -3t �I P:N U ul t ! S x rl ! Z- -41 rf in Irl rl t'1'III r"rn 1'1 rl I'lls" AI t O r)c) Iw rl 0 rrI rl :.j I Zyv) L IS S E T S S LL: x x:.Z OOw _ .y.y"�yy 17 r i0 OO G- O () Q O vUUO� 7C rn a rnr1' to s! N JJO 'Au u n x In NV,CG CU)NV�C rr 1r 1 ➢.A it> D n r- A a. ."� _ j i r' r+ P1 7n rt 71"'1'Tl rt i`i rl r'1 4-1 C'1 1 w rnTj 2. a. S i 1 4 z v �zuxc,Cil pp ;v cc a rn a n AJ ] I A .'D rl r .'•/1 A 1 37 ( 1 F N G7 N -I .y-1.-I-i •1+-1 N-•1�1 f1 C")C2 m'a nZ p .-.•r O n C 2Z� v v' n'.�n�pinL b�D sq rl ri Z D r! "r x IG) 'r r T C r T T j 'V V b C rG C!:c c c•C c C.0 3 ;u III v`,� .... r r r r r.rlrrill.rlrlr-r r-- aas -t r- n ,.., f+7 _ a- 9. N r rr- rrrrrrrr=r c A V.rl .T W as No w-P•G• Yo NP-R.fP Go f� ;K AT z � YS C -f V)to G Fn to rn to N to to N In (n 'D CC'CC CCCC C t. -. z M In W CD�fD S:SSCD l27GOtp T` r rn Ni!) Ntn anN tnyyN N O :t rl z rP., 2 2 r oD�000��000� a r -•..�r. C7 f l t l l '1 r rr r r r rr r r r r.trrrrrrrrr N W W W W N W W N ry N U4,64 W W W MI w W W W W W V-V -+ W W 1D.p: W W W W W W W W W W W W O C) G O N O O G O O 0:000'00 OD 000 Q -1 j�l 1 11 W P P _ P W r j P�t LN-LA -•.,r .Nr r N N N r N N'fV.•W—V •TMw W .�+ rr 6`j 0,; ...• ...�r..•-•J...�rrr r� -� • t 1 Ail 1 1 :1 1 1 !1 1 1 .1 11 W PLA.lam W;W..+r-..-.r.� ►. 1 N N N 9V rw ti I 1 N IV r V PMw N-+ w j •u � w 1 P st w 3 v) r• • a r, I, x V. �r � n N y I : � u r: x s- x c v r•. ooao t 1 i � j 1� • � 1 I l t ( v up u co otao n r 1 4 ! i o+o o Al I i E i I r!rr x Ci'vv� lr� f I f � -r fa m -•� I , -c.r C :cn f I G -•I--1 z r) a,'z o w Cc Fr t I i N ic"j 2 n i 0 - - - i - R Vr G� X. P7 G� p F, O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co t1i 00 o O CC) cc CC) OD co C)o o r rLnr r r r r G N N N N N W N W W W l0 w 1D D r r r w r w w co O 00 N r N N N N N N w F� O O O N O O N O O O to O J F W N O H 3 w r N N N r N Ui O 110O O O o p O � O O O O O 0 w n W F✓ 1- O r O O O O O O w r* r r r r r r P W N O J O I F✓ 0 r O O O F✓ r ~ w w w �� r r r o r O O O O O O O O W Ln Ln Ln 0 0 O r O N O O 0 O O O w p F O O O O O O O O 00 N) 00 0 0 Oo w Co co Co 07 0 C- b rF- Lnr r r r r a r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r rFfF (D O O O 00 O O 0 0 0 O O O O O 00 O O O O O. O O 9 (D r r r r r r r r r r r r r FJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n O o 0 00 0 o O o 0 o O O O O 00 O O O O O O O rt F, O rn OD r J n 51 OO Ol In r O N r .P 00 0 Cry W 1 -P- \-n O O \J1 O Ln w r N OD O 0) Ni OrD O O O r w O r to a t0 o O \-nO \.n W a\ -� \-nO O G A. O O In O Ln J � � o . O 00 O O O Ol -P- O O rt O ty OD a rt 9 n n 0 z z G C �4 G n tij CD 0 A ^• ^• C) En D 27 G 'o a G - o O O (D G CD (D (D (D (D (D P) :0 "O L1 r-R7 C H G G £ It B B B Bs B 'c7 � 9 r r "O r (D '"d rt r• FA H. C+ C+ (D �l H. �'• F'. Fl. H. F,. P. P. F'• r m rt (D rt N• r• �l (D C+ c+ C+ C+ C+ a .c - cD (D (D x N o r3 a a cn a m z a oa o� 0 C+ �d d (n � � Cn � x tz F+. F' H. (D (D (D O (D F-i H H. r• a i-{ G N G a' O r-h O O z C A �h F-3 0 C+ C tj ti0 '* G� r+ ty w n `G (GD ((D y a I� r En Q, r ED En O r• �V O C 7 (D rt (D (D B O P) ro ro ro �5 11 �s z 0 (D �r Cf) QU OD (D �n w w w w J r r r r -] 7 7 1] 7 -J -J ; Ln In Ln In w - J J J J W W W W W W W W w W W w W w -P. 4=1 � W W W W W W W U.) N r O �p OD J P W N I- O OD l O\ Vl W z O t1J t-I H C7 ~ C" C7 3 Cn d C] CO I� r O n (D t7 W (D C+ t-� O C+ (n cn m a (D r (D Q G G m G C+ P) tzl B P) c-F C+ C rt (] rt LaH N rt n "S C+ W B C+. co G o Imo• 0 r to rt (D (D O O (D 0 (D Z c-F a a (n ZI (D (D n �5 o O P) w w O G n G7 O rh c+ C P) � It j+I n H O to P) m (D z (D co Cl) a t1ir 3 ? r G r C+ ~r G (D (D r Fi r• F (D ° w H. m o � � F � Fj o o ° rt F (n (n 5 (D O G (D 10 (D a ~ ro w rat m H (D 11 (D m . C+ It o rt ::s G � Ll+ CJ r- p (D G U) rF n r J H w a� OD OO N r O 1 00 w r w DO � w ] -P!- �J O O L71 OD r O O m P r O O CC) OD -P" -P" VI rr OD O o O O O � \-n O O O .p O to o Ln N l0 O O p O 1 O dl -p- O 00 OD 0 0 00 00 1� LI) LJ W W W W J J J J J 0 0 0 0 0 o a w r W w ,p J n M--' OJ J N O a ~ O N N N rt Ln r rn n I I I 1 1 0-3 (7 x to m C7 a O F OO F N N N � > lc E E 5 a M m Z m O n rt " m o a' 00000 n H by P'1 CL ,b C CN O 0 00 0 0 9 M as '* m o 00000 n C rt O Fr O N ro m w w O W W W C ~ O O O w W lJ1 N W O J .A rt O O O O O O O w rn 0 0 0 0 0 w �o � ow 10 w o %D O J o w0) Ln0 A a' rt y n n 0 0 a z o rt r3 z cn M z x m x In r N A • py V^ YJ M 1•� co N 1, Ln w W n Ln Ul L z 0 o w � � c rt m z • a 3 N rt �t p w a m L m rt in n w LO k J 'D W Ln O rt 10 � O O o O F•, �, ,®r n 123 East First Ave., Shakopee, MN 55379 • (612) 445-7200 Instant Printing • Commercial Printing Dear Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, Due to the lack of employees at my shop, I am forced to be there for what seems like 24 hours in a day, this, of course, leaves no time for any extra- curri- cular activities or committees, therefore it is with deep regret that I turn in my resignation to you and the committee members. This meeting dated y N•-�� 13th will be my last meeting. I would like to thank all of you, and the City of Shakopee for giving me the chance to express my feelings and concerns about the downtown, I feel that the downtown is in good hands with the committee members we have today. My support is and will always be behind this group in whatever decision they make, but I hope we get something done with the downtown. Sincerely, Terry Link Recommended Action: _ 1] Accept resignation-_ 2] Offer Resolution of Appreciation (No . 2387) RESOLUTION NO. 2387 A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO TERRY LINK WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Council did establish, on April 21, 1981, the Ad Hoc Downtown Committee, a sub-committee of the Industrial Commercial Commission, for the purpose of assisting in the preparation of a downtown economic development strategy; and WHEREAS, Terry Link did willingly and interestedly accept an appointment, as one of the original members to the Ad Hoc Downtown Committee; and WHEREAS, the Ad Hoc Downtown Committee has met on numerous occasions to study and consider the best comprehensive plan for downtown revitalization; and WHEREAS, Terry Link has unselfishly contributed many hours of service to the City of Shakopee during his four years on the Ad Hoc Downtown Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Shakopee City Council, on behalf of the residents of Shakopee, the Ad Hoc Downtown Committee, and City staff that the Shakopee City Council does hereby extend to Terry Link the. deep appreciation of the City for his time .and efforts while serving on the Ad Hoc Downtown Committee. Adopted in Adj . Regular Session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this 19th day of March, 1985. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of 1985. City Attorney MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator 9"k FROM: -_:,x,th S. Cox, City Clerk tl: Resolution of Appreciation to Janet Williams DATE: March 11, 1985 Introduction & Background Janet Williams has served on the Shakopee Cable Communications Advisory Commission since its inception in 1983 until the expiration of her term on January 31 , 1985. The attached resolution expresses Council ' s appreciation to Janet for her time and efforts while serving on the Commission. Alternatives i. Adopt resolution. 2. Do not adopt resolution. Recommendation Alternative No. 1. Recommended Action Offer Resolution No. 2385 , A Resolution of Appreciation to Janet Williams, and move its adoption. JSc/jms RESOLUTION NO. 2385 A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO JANET WILLIAMS WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Council did establish, in January of 1983 , the Shakopee Cable Communications Advisory Commission to be comprised of local residents, for the purpose of advising the Council on the construction, operation and maintenance of the City's cable communications franchise; and WHEREAS, Janet Williams did willingly and interestedly accept an appointment, as one of the original members, to the Shakopee Cable Communications Advisory Commission; and WHEREAS, the Commission has met monthly, since its inception, considering numerous matters in relation to the cable communications franchise; and WHEREAS, Janet Williams has unselfishly contributed many hours of service to the City of Shakopee during her two years on the Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Shakopee City Council, on behalf of the residents of Shakopee and on behalf of the Shakopee Cable Communications Advisory Commission and the City staff, that the Shakopee City Council does hereby extend to Janet Williams the deep appreciation of the City for her time and efforts while serving on this important commission. Adopted in adj . regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee , Minnesota, held this 19th day of March, 1985. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of 1985 City Attorney MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, CIty Cler� J RE: Resolution of Appreciation to Bev Koehnen DATE: March 11 , 1985 Introduction & Background On March 5 , 1985 Council accepted the resignation of Bev Koehnen from the Planning Commission and requested the preparation of a resolution thanking her for her efforts. The attached resolution expresses Council ' s appreciation to Bev for her contributions over the past 8-1/2 years. Alternatives 1. Adopt resolution of appreciation. 2. Don' t adopt resolution of appreciation. Recommendation Alternative No. 1. Recommended Action Offer Resolution No. 2377 , A Resolution of Appreciation to Beverly J. Koehnen, and move its adoption. JSC/jms RESOLU'T'ION NO. 2377 A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO BEVERLY J. KOEHNEN WHEREAS, Beverly J. Koehnen served on the Shakopee Planning Commission from October, 1976 to February, 1985 , and WHEREAS, Beverly J. Koehnen has unselfishly contributed many hours of service to the City of Shakopee during her 8-1/2 years on the Shakopee Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Shakopee City Council, on behalf of the residents of Shakopee and on behalf of the City Planning Commission and the City staff, that the Shakopee City Council does hereby extend to Beverly J. Koehnen the deep apprecia- tion of the City for her years of civic interest and dedicated service to the community. Adopted in Adj . Regular Session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this 19th day of March, 1985 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of 1985 . City Attorney MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Cler� RE: Gambling Moratorium DATE: March 15 , 1985 Introduction On March 5 , 1985 Council requested the preparation of an ordinance proclaiming a moratorium for 90 days and a resolution disallowing a gambling license for the Nat ' l MS Society. Background The ordinance and resolution requested are attached. As a result of the new state laws pertaining to gambling, the City gambling regulations need to be rewritten. In conjunction with the rewriting of the City's gambling ordinance, staff will be making recommendations for Council consideration on possible restrictions which the City may wish to impose in addition to state law. Staff will be working on this during the 90 day moratorium. I have been advised by the State Gambling Board, as well as by the Nat' l MS Society, that the Nat ' l MS Society has applied for a gambling license in a number of cities throughout the state. About one-half of the applications have been disallowed at the request of the municipalities involved, according to the State Gambling Board. Alternatives 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2388 and Ordinance No. 161. 2. Do not adopt Resolution No. 2388 and Ordinance No. 161 . Recommendation Alternative No. 1 Action Recommended 1. Offer Ordinance No. 161 , An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending Shakopee City Code Chapter 6 , entitled "Business Licenses" by adding a Moratorium Provision to Section 6 entitled "Gambling Device and Bingo Licenses" , and move its adoption. 2. Offer Resolution No. 2388, A Resolution Praying for Disallowance of the Application of the National MS Society, Minnesota Northstar Chapter, for a Gambling License from the Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control Board, and move its adoption. JSC/jms 1-; ORDINANCE NO. 161 Fourth Series An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending Shakopee City Code Chapter 6, entitled "Business Licenses" by Adding a Moratorium Provision to Section 6 entitled "Gambling Device and Bingo Licenses". THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section I: Moratorium proclaimed Shakopee City Code Sec. 6.32 is hereby amended by adding thereto sub- division 9 proclaiming a moratorium on the granting of any and all licenses and permits under Sec 6.32 for a period of 90 days from the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION II: Exception Nothing herein shall affect the licenses or permits now in force nor prevent the granting of such license or permit to locally based fraternal or service organizations. SECTION III: Adopted by reference General . provisions and definitions applicable to the entire City Code including penalty provisions of Chapter 1 and Sec. 6.99 are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION IV: When in Force After the adoption, signing and attestation of this ordinance it shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City of Shakopee and shall be in full force and effect on and after the date following such publication. Passed in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of 1985. ATTEST: Mayor of the City of Shakopee City Clerk Prepared and approved as to form this day of Varch, 1985. Ju ius A. Coller, II, City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 2388 A RESOLUTION PRAYING FOR DISALLOWANCE OF THE APPLICATION OF THE NATIONAL MS SOCIETY, MINNESOTA NORTHSTAR CHAPTER, FOR A GAMBLING LICENSE FROM THE MINNESOTA CHARITABLE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD WHEREAS, as a result of changes in the State Law, the authority, for the most part, over so called charitable gambling has been removed from local municipalitiesa-u44- invested in a newly created State Board, and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee is now evaluating what part, if any, the City wishes to play in the granting and control of gambling licenses and has not as yet formulated a policy, and WHEREAS, at the meeting of the Shakopee City Council on the 19th day of March, 1985, the Shakopee City Council enacted a moratorium on granting of all licenses for gambling devices and bingo licenses, with some exceptions not applicable hereto, and WHEREAS, there is now before the Shakopee City Council an application for a gambling license by the National MS Society, Minnesota Northstar Chapter, for a gambling license. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL, That the Council prays that the application for a gambling license by the National MS Society, a Minnesota Northstar Chapter, now pending before the Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control Board be disallowed. Passed in regular meeting of the Shakopee City Council held this day of 1985. Mayor of the City of Shakopee =EST: City Clerk 'repared and approved as to form this .3th da of M h, 1985. ul' A. Coller, II, Ci • torney CITU ^aF'� SH KOP INCORPORATED 1870 +� ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 129 E. 1st Avenue - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650 MEMO TO: John -K i- Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Ray Ruuska, Engineering Coordinator SUBJECT: Timber Trails Feasibility Report DATE: March 5, 1985 INTRODUCTION: The Engineering Department needs a Council Resolution ordering the preparation of a Feasibility Report for the above project. BACKGROUND: This project is identified as a priority project in the 1985- 1989 Capital Improvement Program. This would be one of the first projects to be done under the new Street Rehabilitation and Preservation Policy. Attached is Resolution No. 2384, directing the Engineering Department to prepare a Feasibility Report for Timber Trails. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2384, A Resolution Ordering the Prepar- ation of a Report on an ImpKvem Timber Trails Street Preser- vation. Appr v d for Submittal H. R. urr i er, City Engineer RR/pmp MEMRES2 RESOLUTION NO. 2384 A Resolution Orde-ing The Preparation Of A Report On An improvement Timber Trails Street Preservation WHEREAS, it is pr000sed to improve Timber Trails Addition by Street Improvement and to assess the benefitted property for all or a portion ion i�f the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Charter 4E9. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report t�� thfa f�_ .tr,Cyl 'dL':" OIL L'Tir`nni-ent speed proposed the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the prn os _ d improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement , and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended Adopted in session of the r1tV Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of J Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to forth this day of 19 City Attorney I FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ROADWAY SERVING LOTS OF RECORD IN EAGLEWOOD 1ST, 2ND9 AND 3RD ADDITIONS AND UNPLATTED PROPERTY IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 115 SOUTH RANGE 22 WEST SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PREPARED BY RAY RUUSKA ENGINEERING COORDINATOR CITY OF SHAKOPEE I hereby certify that this plan,specification,or report xSj@s preparby me or under my direct supervision 9d -and that ? a I Registered Professional angio r under the I e t -,ti;,-innesota. ra e. Re sraiion X10. 1389 MARCH 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page No. Feasibility Report Introduction ..... ... . . ... ........ . ... 1 Background . ... . .. . ... .. . ... . . ... . . . .. . 1 Scope .... . ......... ...... . . .. . . .... .. 2 Alternatives ..... . . .. .... . . . ... .. . . . . 2 Design Criteria . .... .. ............... 2 Assessments . .... ....... . . ... . .. . . .. .. 3 Appendix Cost Estimates .................. . . ... 5 Assessment Computations ........... ... 6 Drawings Map A .. . .. ... . .... ... ..... .. .. . ..... . 9 — Typical Sections . .. .. . . . . . ... . . . . .. .. 10 Soils Report ..... .. .. . . ..... ... . .. . . . (Attached) FEASIBILITY REPORT IMPROVEMENT OF ROADWAY SERVING LOTS OF RECORD IN EAGLEWOOD 1ST, 2ND, AND 3RD ADDITIONS AND UNPLATTED PROPERTY IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 115 SOUTH RANGE 22 WEST SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota ordered the preparation of a Feasibility Report by Resolution No. 2265, on May 22, 1984, for the improve- ment of roadways serving platted property in the Eaglewood 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Additions, hereafter referred to as the "Eaglewood Subdivision" in Section 32, Township 115 South, Range 22 West, Scott County, Minnesota. BACKGROUND Roadways serving the Eaglewood Subdivision were completed in 1974 and 1976. Due to unacceptable and undesirable soils and water in the road subgrades, many pavement failures have occurred in the subdivision. Trucks can no longer use the roads because of the condition of the roadways. Essential fire service cannot be guaranteed to property owners due to the weight of larger fire trucks. Routine garbage pick-up, delivery of materials for house construction and other non-essential heavy traffic has been severely limited. School bus traffic has also caused further deterioration of the roadways. Patching of pavement failures was begun in 1979. It is anticipated that after Spring thaw, extraor- dinary maintenance will have to be performed again to allow residents to reach their homes. The City of Shakopee has received a petition for street rehabilitation, dated May 1, 1984, and signed by more than the required 35 percent of the property owners in the Eaglewood Subdivision. 1 SCOPE This report has investigated the feasibility of reconstructing roadways in the Eaglewood Subdivision. It included the analysis of the existing roadway structure, alternative recommendations for its rehabilitation, the estimated cost of rehabilitation, the proposed assessments, financing alternatives, and conclusions about the feasibility of the recommendations. ALTERNATIVES This report considers three alternatives. Alternate 1 is to rehabilitate the roadways in the Eaglewood Subdivision. Alternate 2 is to continue maintenance of the roadways. Alternate 3 is to do nothing. DESIGN CRITERIA Alternate 1 would rehabilitate rhe roadways in accordance with the City of Shakopee Design Criteria and Standard Specifications for Construction of Roadway, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Sewer. Alternate 2 would continue the expenditure of increasing amounts of maintenance funds. Alternate 3 would permit complete deterioration of the road structure. ALTERNATIVES Alternate 1. The attached soils investigation, performed by Braun Engineering Testing and dated July 20, 1984, which has identified areas in the roadway subgrades which have undesirable soils ranging from peat to organic topsoils. The soils report also identifies a high water table in the lower areas of Eaglewood. Those roadways with uncesirabie soil would have to be subcut and filled with suitable subgrade material. Those roadways with water present would have to be raised to a level 4 feet above the water. Some drainage improvements would be made to further eliminate water in the subgrade of the roadways. Those roadways in Eaglevood which have not yet failed would be overlayed to protect their structural integrity. Map "A" in the Appendix illustrates which roadways would bE reconstructed and which would be overlayed. 2 Alternate 2. In recent years extraordinary maintenance of failed sections of the roadways has been performed. Failed sections have been subcut and filled with granular material. Some bituminous patching has been done. This work has allowed for the access and egress of property owners. Each of these reworked sections requires further maintenance each year. Continued extraordinary maintenance of this type would be done with selection of this alternate. Alternate 3. The do nothing alternative lets the road structure deteriorate until property is no longer accessible by conventional vehicle. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENTS Assessable Units. The guidelines for establishing lot assessments are provided in City Council Resolution No. 2278, "A Resolution Establishing the Policy for Funding the Rehabilitation of Streets in the City of Shakopee." In this Resolution, a formula for developing front footage is found. Computing front footage assessments for this project has led to the discovery of inequity in assessments for this particular project area. Inequitable assessments are due to vast differences in lot sizes in Eaglewood. The differences in lot sizes is caused by the presence of wetlands in the larger lots, thereby reducing the buildable area of the lots. The following example illustrates this disparity. The example shows the difference between the actual front footage and calculated front footage for assessments and how the formula heavily discriminates against the lots with greater square footage. These lot examples were picked at random from Eaglewood 2nd Addition. Front Foot Calculation Lot 2, Blk 3 Actual F.F. 249 Ft. (48,577.0 Sq.Ft.) Calculated F.F. 143 Ft. Lot 8, Blk 2 Actual F.F. 69 Ft. (99,767.8 Sq.Ft.) Calculated F.F. 293 Ft. Lot 1, Blk 1 Actual F.F. 190 Ft. (200,238.0 Sq.Ft.) Calculated F.F. 589 Ft. This report recommends assessment of the project cost on a per lot basis. An amendment to Resolution No. 2278 would have to precede acceptance of the recommended assessment method. Assessment Credit. City policy specifies that a credit of 5 percent depreci- ation per year be given to the assessment for this improvement. Estimated assessments reflecting this credit are shown in the Appendix. 3 FINANCING ALTERNATIVES The preceding section of this report dealing with "Assessments," is written following established City policy. A problem arises if the roadways fail before their design life expectancy and the depreciation allowance due to the property owners reduces the total amount to be assessed below the minimum 20 percent required by State Law fDr special levy. Therefore, the following financing alternatives can be considered by City Council. Alternate 1. Property owners agree to pay a minimum 20 percent of project cost in assessments with the balance paid by General Obligation Bond Sales that are funded by special levy, in this case, individual lot assessments would increase to an estimated $1,390.00 per lot. Alternate 2. Rural Shakopee roads are combined with projects in the Tax Increment Project Area. A minimum 20 percent of the total combined project cost is paid by TIF with the balance paid in order to make special levy possible. Alternate 3. Referendum. Alternate 4. Do nothing. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOM(MDATIONS Continued maintenance of the roadways in Eaglewood will be increasingly more expensive and should not be considered a solution to the problem. Maintenance of this type does not lead to any uniformity in the structure of the roadway. Those materials used for maintenance are difficult to salvage and reuse when reconstruction is done. Until reconstruction occurs, load limits will have to remain, severely limiting truck traffic. The Braun report recommends increasing the structural section of those roadways in Eaglewood which have not failed yet. Approximately 55 percent of the rcadways in the Eaglewood Subdivision have failed and require complete reconstruction. Further delay in improving the structural section of those roadways which have not failed will lead to recon- struction of the remaining 45 percent. The petition for roadway improvements presented to the City by more than the required 35 percent of benefitted property owners requested improvements be made in 1984. An appraiser has stated that pzoperty benefit can be proven for either of the lot assessments as shown it. the appendix. This project is therefore recommended as feasible for construction. 4 APPENDIX COST ESTIMATES ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1. Remove Bituminous Pavement 12,000 S.Y. $ 1.50 $18,000.00 2. Subgrade Excavation 3,500 C.Y. 5.00 17,500.00 3. Geotextile Construction Fabric 12,000 S.Y. 2.25 27,000.00 4. Granular Borrow 6,000 C.Y. 4.50 27,000.00 5. Class 5 Aggregate (3138) 6,000 Ton 6.50 39,000.00 6. Bituminous Wear Course (Mod 2341) 2,000 Ton 28.00 56,000.00 7. Class 2 Aggregate Shouldering 250 Ton 6.50 1,625.00 8. Seeding 2.0 Acre 500.00 1,000.00 Subtotal $187,125.00 10% Construction Contingency 18,712.50 Total Construction $205,837.50 25% Technical & Admin. Services 51,459.38 Total Cost $257,296.87 5 ASSESSZaxT COKPQTATIONS Assessment Total ILssessable Cost $257,297 .00 Number of Lots 37 $6,953 .97 Per Lo--- x 25% _ $1,738.49 Total per lot assessment = $1,738.49 With applied credits, individual assessments are as follows: EAGLEWOOD 1ST ADDITION — BUILT IN 1974 City Policy 2O% Lot No. Blk. No. Credit Amount Assessment 4 1 45% $956.17 $1,390.79 5 1 45% 956 .17 1 ,390.79 6 1 45% 956.17 1,390.79 7 1 45% 956 .17 1,390.79 8 1 45% 956 .17' 1,390.79 9 1 45% 956.17' 1,390.79 1 2 45% 956.17 1,390.79 City of Shakopee (Park) 45% 956.17' 1,390.79 EAGLEWOOD 2ND ADDITION — BUILT IN 1976 City Policy 20% Lot No. Elk. No. Credit Amount Assessment 1 1 55% $782..32 $1,390.79 1 2 55% 782,.32 1,390.79 2 2 55% 782,.32 1 ,390.79 3 2 55% 782..32 1,390.79 4 2 55% 782.32 1 ,390.79 5 2 55% 782..32 1 ,390.79 6 2 55% 782.32 1,390.79 7 2 55% 782.32 1,390.79 8 2 55% 782.32 1,390.79 9 2 55% 782.32 1 ,390.79 10 2 55% 782.32 1 ,390 .79 11 2 55% 782.32 1 ,390.79 1 3 55% 782.32 1 ,390.79 2 3 55% 782.32 1 ,390.79 3 3 55% 782.32 1 ,390.79 4 3 55% 782.32 1 ,390.79 5 3 55% 782.32 1 ,390.79 6 EAGLEWOOD 3RD ADDITION BUILT IN 1976 City Policy 20% Lot No. Blk. No. Credit Amount Assessment 2 1 55% $ 782.32 $1,390.79 3 1 55% 782.32 1,390.79 4 1 55% 782.32 1 ,390.79 5 1 55% 782.32 1,390.79 6 1 55% 782.32 1,390.79 7 1 55% 782.32 1,390.79 8 1 0% 1,738.49 1,390.79 9 1 55% 782.32 1,390.79 1 2 55% 782.32 1,390.79 UNPLATTEU PROPERTY City Policy 20% Parcel No. Credit Amount Assessment 932-5241-007 0 $1,738.49 $1,390.79 27-931-003-04 0 1,738.49 1,390.79 27-931-5220-003-02 0 1,738.49 1,390.79 27-931-5220-003-00 0 1,738.49 1,390.79 City Policy 20% Total Total AMOUNT ASSESSED $34,161.32 $51,459.23 CITY POLICY COMPUTATIONS TOTAL PROJECT COST $257,297.00 LESS ASSESSMENT PER CITY POLICY $ 34,161.32 CITY MATCHING COST $223,135.68 ANNUAL ADVALOREM LEVY (10 years C l0I) 0.4909 MILS VALUE OF ANNUAL AD VALOREM LEVY $ 36,314.00 7 20% ASSESSMENT COMPUTATIONS TOTAL PROJECT COST $257,297.00 LESS 202 ASSESSMENT $ 51,459.23 CITY MATCHING COST $205,837.77 ANNUAL AD VALOREM LEVY (10 YEARS @ 10%) 0.4529 MP3.S VALUE OF ANNUAL AD VALOREM LEVY $ 33,499.00 COMBIIiED RIIRs.L RmABiLium ag PROJECT COSTS Timber Trails $ 75,000.00 Deerview $ 27,000.00 Eaglewood $257,297.00 Montecito $ 13,712.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $373,009.00 LESS 202 ASSESSMENTS $ 74,601.80 CITY MATCHING COST $298,407.20 ANNUAL AD VALOREM LEVY 0.6565 MILS VALUE OF ANNUAL ,AD VALOREM LEVY $ 48,564.00 SPECIAL LEVIES CHANGE CUMULATIVE YEAR LEVY AMOUNT FROM PRIOR YEAR CHANGE 1983 $346,339.00 1984 $275,781 .00 ($70,558.00) ($70,558.00) 1985 $290,514.00 $14,733.00 ($55,825.00) 1986 $278,308.00 ($12,206.00) ($68,031.00) 1987 $234,713.00 ($43,595.00) ($111,626.00) 1988 $61,311.00 ($173,402.00) ($285,028.00) 1989 $61,595.00 $284.00 ($284,744.00) 1990 $4,923.00 ($56 ,672.00) ($341 ,416.00) 1991 $3,790.00 ($1,133.00) ($342,549.00) 1992 $4,828.00 $1,038.00 ($341,511 .00) 1993 $5,736.00 $908.00 ($340,603 .00) 1994 $6,508.00 $772.00 ($339,831.00) * NEGATIVE CHANGE DENOTES AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR MATCHING FUNDS. 8 I A1 ,,� M a S co W O ro o m i rr s5`NG II ®VERLAY AREA N ' REVISION •. �i«».......... ..... ;a. �. MA� ITY 1 6 X19 40 r O40 CON UCTION � �a , AR A 10 � �. 44, ,QjDR E '9n �OOQ ' _ ` ��:' ? r' , O O �I j4006 \ S SPH 3/G4ATE/_85 1 '=20 0 CHECKED SHEET NO OAAWING N Oii 47j r 7F SMAKOPEE `^� 9 d) W 0 C7 Lu LO H O C� W !— F- -- to X V i • N Q Mw W r Q W D W O Q W OO m U I ~ •� S� Q c N co 2 O � o co i O G� Y cl) gu = z a W CO z 061 CO - U JW Co N C co CIO co W z > U O O Q } W v n- zo kilo ii i �31ti - 84-214 SOIL BORINGS AND R-VALUE TESTING -- Proposed Street Improvements Eaglewood Subdivision Shakopee, MN CITY OF SHAKOPEE July 20 , 1984 T BRA BRAUR" Services Since 1957 ENGINEERING TESTING =SOTA: Minneapolis, Hibbing, St. Cloud, Rochester, St. Paul J.S.BRAUN,P.E. G.D.KLUEMPKE.P.E. I DAKOTA:Williston P.H.ANDERSON DALE R.ALLEN,P.E. C.G.KRUSE,P.E JAMES J.CRAIG,Jr.,P.E. ANA:Billings D.R.HAUSLER,P.E. Reply To: P.O. Box 35108 Mpls. , MN 55435 ( 612) 941-5600 July 20, 1984 City of Shakopee _ 129 East lst Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379-1376 Attn: Ray Ruuska RE: 84-214 SOIL BORINGS AND _ R—VALUE TESTING Proposed Street Improvements Eaglewood Subdivision Shakopee, MN Mr. Ruuska: As authorized on May 16, 1984, we have recently completed our soils investigation and laboratory testing for the above referenced project. Based on the data obtained, it is our opinion that there are a number of reasons which caused the existing streets to deteriorate. An inadequate pavement cross-section, poor subgrade soils, and high groundwater appear to be the main causes. It appears in the higher elevations of the subdivision (Bridge _ Crossing from Bridge Spur southwest) the streets are in much better condition. An increase in pavement cross-section may only be required in this area. Please consult the text of this report for our analysis and recommendations regarding repair and reconstruction, _ CONSULTING ENGINEERS/SOILS AND MATERIALS Affiliated Company for Chemical&Environmental Testing and Consulting—Braun Environmental Laboratories,Inc. " :- - 84-214 City of Shakopee -2- July 20 , 1984 It has been a pleasure to have been of service to you on this project. If there are any questions or if further information is needed, please contact us at your convenience. Very truly yours, BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. �.i James M. Samuelson Senior Engineerin Assistant j C. G. Kruse, P.E. Vice President - Engineering z JMS/CGK:gec z -J Attachments i t i t I The content of this report and supporting documents are for the exclusive use of the addressee.In the absence of our prior written approval ENGINEERING TESTING we make no representation and assume no responsibility to any other parties regarding such content. �r July 20 , 1984 84-214 SOIL BORINGS AND R-VALUE TESTING Proposed Street Improvements Eaglewood Subdivision Shakopee, MN A. INTRODUCTION A. l. Scope: A total of 9 power auger borings were performed on the existing streets. In addition, a Hveem stabilometer test was conducted on samples returned to our laboratory. A. 2. Available Information: You provided the as-built site plan _ which shows the final grades and alignment in Eaglewood Subdivision. Severe rutting of the streets has occurred at various locations in the subdivision. A visual reconnaissance confirms that some areas in the streets were impassable at times. Some remedial work has been done to bridge the severely rutted areas. You indicated that garbage trucks would likely be the heaviest loading the streets of the subdivision will experience. For that reason, we have based our recommendations on a 7-ton roadway with an estimated average daily traffic of 50. Projecting the ADT over 20 years, we have estimated a sigma N18 of 5000 , excluding tractor sanitrailer combinations. A. 3. Boring Locations and Elevations: The boring locations were chosen by our firm after our site reconnaissance. The boring locations are shown on the attached sketch and stationing is shown on the Log of Boring sheets. The borings were taken II RA 84-214 City of Shakopee -2- July 20 , 1984 primarily in the areas where severe rutting and breakup of the pavement cross-section has occurred or in areas where poor subgrade materials were anticipated. Surface elevations of the bore holes were referenced to the benchmark noted on the plan provided. The benchmark was a spike in a 24-inch - oak north-northwest of the intersection of Eaglewood Lane and Eaglewood Drive. We understand the elevation of this point is 960. 0 . A. 4. Field Testing and Sampling: The borings were taken on May 31 , 1984 , with a core and auger drill unit mounted on a truck. The power auger borings were taken by advancing the auger to the desired depth and retrieving the cuttings as they were brought to the surface by the continuous flight auger. Soil samples were ' placed in glass jars and returned to our laboratory for further analysis. In addition, bag samples were obtained for Hveem l stabilometer tests. Soil strata changes were inferred from the } disturbed material brought to the surface by the auger. Power auger borings do not provide a definitive index of soil strength and compressibility, so it is not possible to determine how soft and compressible the subsoils are. The soil strength and consistency can be estimated by the resistance while advancing and turning the auger. A. 5. Soil Classifications: Mineral soils encountered in the borings were visually and manually classified in the field by the _ crew chief in accordance with ASTM D2487 "Unified Soils Classification System" and ASTM D2488 "Recommended Practice for Visual and Manual Description of Soils. " A copy of ASTM D2487 is attached. All samples were then returned to the laboratory for BRA U11 84-214 City of Shakopee -3- July 20 , 1984 review of the field classifications by a Soils Engineer. Representative samples will remain in this office for a period of 60 days to be available for your examination. A. 6. Groundwater: Immediately after withdrawal. of the auger, the bore holes were probed and the depth to cave-in and the presence or absence of water was noted. The borings which were out of the main traffic area were left open and rechecked 4 days after completion. These borings were then backfilled. A. 7. Laboratory Testing: Laboratory testing was conducted on selected samples. One Hveem stabilometer (R-value) was conducted to determine the strength characteristics of the subgrade soil. Hydrometers were also conducted on two samples. This information was used in the preparation of this report. The results of our laboratory tests are attached to this report. B. RESULTS B. 1. Logs: Log of Boring sheets indicating the depth and identification of the various soil strata and water level information are attached. It should be noted that the depths shown as boundaries between the strata are only approximate. The actual change may be more of a transition and the depth of change likely varies horizontally. B. 2. Soils Encountered: A variety of soil'. conditions were encountered in the power auger borings. Fill over topsoil was encountered in borings B-1 , B- 7 , B-8 and B-9 . Fill over fibrous peat was encountered in borings B-3 and B-4 . The fill soils were generally silty sandy clays and silty clays with medium plasticity. The soils encoun-=eyed in the borings were moist to -WIT][ BRA 84-214 City of Shakopee -4- July 20 , 1984 wet and estimated soft based on the resistance to the auger while drilling and advancing the auger. B. 3. Groundwater Measurements: Groundwater was generally encountered above the 4-foot depth when the borings were probed after the completion of the borings. When the borings that were left open were rechecked 4 days later, groundwater was encountered within 2 feet of the surface in boring B-4 and generally between 2 1/2 and 4 feet in the remaining borings which were rechecked. Surface water adjacent to the embankment in the low area was at or below the level encountered in the borings. Water levels in the ponds adjacent to the embankment varied in the subdivision. It is our opinion that some of the groundwater encountered in the borings is water which is trapped in the relatively soft cohesive subgrade soils. It is our opinion that groundwater currently exists between elevations 948 and 953. Groundwater levels should, however, be ., expected to vary from place to place and season to season. C. ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS C.l. Subgrade Preparation: It is our opinion that a portion of the deterioration of existing pavement and subgrade was due to frost heave. To provide the most suitable subgrade, we recommend that grade be raised to a minimum of 4 feet above the existing water levels using a relatively free draining soil for the embankment. It will also be necessary to provide adequate drainage away from the subgrade using either drain tile or ditches. 84-214 City of Shakopee -5- July 20 , 1984 We recommend that the existing bituminous and Class 5 be removed from the existing streets and stockpiled. This could, if effectively broken up into pieces smaller than 6 inches, be used in the upper portions of the subgrade. This will provide a more stable subgrade to carry equipment during construction of the pavement cross-section. We recommend that the thickness of the bituminous, if used in the subgrade, be kept to a maximum thickness of 10 inches, thus avoiding excessive settlement of the pavement cross-section. An alternative to this would be to rip the existing bituminous, and working it such that the bituminous is broken up into pieces smaller than 6 inches, and leaving it in place. The additional fill could then be placed directly over the reworked bituminous and Class 5 . We recommend that all organic soils be removed from within 4 feet of final grade. We anticipate organic soils within 4 feet of final grade in an area extending from the intersection of Eaglewood Lane and Eaglewood Circle 100 to 150 feet in all directions and the low area along Eaglewood Lane and Eaglewood Drive as noted on the attached sketch. To better define the areas of organics within 4 feet of final grade, test pits could be dug at 100-foot intervals along the alignment. Groundwater levels could also be better defined along the alignment. We recommend that adequate oversizing be provided when excavating for the embankment. The recommended criteria for adequate oversizing is 1 foot horizontally from the outside edge of the roadway for each foot of fill placed below final grade. The peat encountered in borings B-3 and B-4 was below 2 to 2 1/2 feet of existing grade. As earlier recommended, the grade in this area will likely be raised approximately 2 feet. Excavation U 11 84-214 City of Shakopee -6- July 20 , 1984 of the peat would, if grade is raised, not be required. We anticipate further consolidation of the peat after the additional fill has been placed. In the anticipated peat areas, it may be advantageous to use fabric below the additional fill. This, in our opinion, would distribute the load more evenly and result in a more uniform settlement. C. 2. Pavement Design: We recommend that the pavement cross- section for the entire site be designed based on an R-value of 9. In the higher elevations of the subdivision (Bridge Crossing from Bridge Spur southwest and Bridge Spur) where the existing streets are in much better condition an overlay to increase the pavement cross-section may only be required. Some cracking was noted in the existing bituminous mat, however , the severity of the cracking was much less than the remainder of the subdivision. We recommend increasing the pavement cross-section to accomodate a ? -subgrade R-value of 9. We estimate the existing pavement, based on 1 3/4 inches of 2341 _ bituminous wear and 5 inches of Class 5 has a G. E. of 9. The minimum G.E. as outlined in MN/DOT' s pavement design manual for a 7-ton design required for the existing subgrade soils is approximately 10 , thus, 1 1/2 inches of additional 2341 bituminous wear would be required to give the existing pavement ;cross-section adequate strength. D. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS AND COMPACTION TESTING T D. 1. We recommend that fill, where required below the pavement cross-section, meet the requirements of MN/DOT 3149 select granular borrow, less than 15% passing the #200 sieve. BRAHn '. 84-214 City of Shakopee -7- July 20 , 1984 The soil should be compacted to a minimum of 95% of standard Proctor density ASTM D698-70 below 3 feet of final subgrade and to 100% of standard Proctor density in the upper 3 feet of the subgrade. Compaction tests should be conducted to evaluate the densities obtained. We recommend that all excavations in the roadway be observed by a qualified Soils Engineer to evaluate if these soils are of adequate strength to support the embankment. E. GENERAL REMARKS The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the 9 power auger borings performed at the locations indicated on the attached sketch. variations may occur between these borings, the nature and extent of which may not become evident until construction. If variations are encountered, it will be necessary to make a re- evaluation of the recommendations of this report after performing on-site observations during the construction and noting the characteristics of any variations. Such variations may result in additional foundation costs and it is suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose. To permit correlation of the soil data obtained to date with the actual soil conditions encountered during construction and to provide continuing professional responsibility _ for the conformance of the construction to the concepts originally contemplated in this report and to the plans and specifications, it is recommended that we be retained to develop and perform the necessary observation and testing program for the excavation and foundation phases of the project. 84-214 City of Shakopee -8- July 20 , 1984 _ If others perform the recommended observations and/or testing of construction, professional responsibility becomes divided since in doing so, they assume responsibility for verifying that the soil conditions throughout the construction areas are similar to those encountered in the borings or recognizing variations which would require a change in recommendations. Services performed by the geotechnical and material engineers for this project have been conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area under similar budget and time restraints. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. BRA !l . �ry dewo " _ 1> r�1 e B-1 �. m~ B-9 h Benchmark - Spike in 24" Oak; Low Area-y Y Y N-NW of the intersection of ►' (� B-3 Eaglewood Lane & Eaglewood Drive. Elevation = 960.0. B-4 - ,� B-8 Low Area `1 G� 3-7 - B-6 'D O O s dp Gp � ro �v ry Co i Co k V ti 4 — • - Denotes Power Auger Boring 84-214 SOIL. BORINGS Proposed Street Improvements Eaglewood Subdivision Shakopee, IDete: 7/7/84 Reweed: _ Drawn: P.IS/B:ii sow: None - LOG OF BORING S � �� PROJECT: 84-214 SOIL BORINGS DATE: Proposed Street Improvements, Eaglewood 5-31-84 Addition - - Addition SCALE: I"=4' BORING: B-1 LOCATION: Station 4+OC BORING: B-2 LOCATION:Station 3+0 Eaglewood Lane Center- Eaglewood Circle 15' SURF. ELEV: 14eglet er CQ. Rd. 17 SUR . ELEV: Right of Centerline. 956.5 , 56.5 Depth Descr i ion o er is Is p W L Det Descr tori o ter is Is WL 2" Bituminous '" �3 tuminous ? 6 lass g" S" Cass o SILTY CLAY, medium plas- SILTY SANDY CLAY, medium o ticity, non to slightly CLtoOL plasticity, with a trace CL organic, black, moist to of fine to medium Gravel wet. brown, moist to wet. (Topsoil or Fill) > 1 . 3% Gravel 39 ., 8% Sand a 32. 9% Silt U 4 26 . 0% Clay SILTY CLAY, medium plas- ticity, with layers of r- SANDY CLAY, grayish brown, moist to wet. r- 0 O .1 tj ro ro a� O w i ro A. ° 10 10 cz ti Water level down 3-'2' Cz Water level down 4' immediately after with- UO immediately after with- drawal of auger. drawal of auger o Water level down 2-2' 4 ro days after completion „ of boring. O a. a� x a� v cn HRAUIi. L O G OF B 0 R I N G S ENGWEER04G TESTMIG PROJECT: 84-214 SOIL BORINGS DATE:5-31-84 Proposed Street Improvements, Eaglewood Addition SCALE: 1"=4' Shakopee, > BORING: B-3 LOCATION:Station X3+4{6 BORING: E-4 LOCATION: Station Eaglewood Drive 13' 11" SURF. ELEV: SURF. E EV, Eaglewood Drive moa 950.5 Left of Centerline 951 .3 Depth Descr ion o er is Is p W L Det Descr tori o ter io Is W L inumi.nous lass 5 T 6114 Class ��5 Pit o SILTY SANDY CLAY, medium r+ CL SILTY CLAY to CLAYEY SAN O plasticity, black and gra, , ' � moist to wet. medium plasticity, gravi h F5 (Fill) abrown, moist to wet. CL-SC ci 2 (Fill) " PEAT, fibrous, black, Q, moist. PT 2. 5 L (Swamp Deposits) PEAT, fibrous, brown, a. moist to wet. PT � (Swamp Deposits) Q) b ro ° 6 ro SANDY CLAY, medium plas- CL M ticity, with CLAYEY SAND, 6.5 > gray, moist to wet. Q; 7.5 SILTY SANDY CLAY, with CL s- — a trace of fine to o SILTY SAND, fine to mediu S ? 14medium Gravel, gray, grained, gray, waterbearitg. waterbearing. Q) w � r 10 10 b Water level down 31-2' SANDY CLAY, medium CL cn immediately after with- plasticity, gray, b drawal of auger. moist to wet. M Water level down 2'2' 4 days after completion of c boring. a v v v V) 15 Water level down 312' immediately after with- drawal o1 auger. Water level down 2' 4 ds aster completion of bor ' f, . BRAUn LOG OF B O R I N G S ENOWEERNG TESTING PROJECT: 84-214 SOIL BORINGS DATE: Proposed Street Improvements, Eaglewood Addition SCALE: 1"=4' Shakopee, MN BORING: B-5 LOCATION: $tat 'Q� BORING: B_6 LP�ATION: Station Eaglewood Drive 18 e t Eridge Crossing SURF. ELEV: of centerline SURF. E EV: centerline 955.0 955.0 Depth Descn tori o erials p WL Depth Description o terials Z WL 6 3/4' �,,3�4" Bituminous 2" Bituminous lass 0 911 7" Class 5 SILTY SANDY CLAY, medium CL 0 C plasticity, brown, moist. SANDY CLAY, modium plas- ticity, brown, moist. CL (Possible Fill) L 2i 41 2 45% Gravel a 35 . 6$ Sand SILTY SANDY CLAY, medium 29 . 8$ Silt plasticity, with a trace CL U 30 . 1$ Clay of root fiber, light brown, moist to wet. 42 -v ro SANDY CLAY, medium plas- CL G ticity, brown, moist. 0 cr 0 ro a� 0 w m 41 L ro e--1 P, ° 10 10 ro b ro Water level not encounte ed 4., Water level down 5 when probing boring immediately after with- immediately after with- drawal of auger. rawal of auger. ro Boring immediately back- filled. 0 a a� x v a� LOG OF BORIN GS [HRAUR PROJECT: 84-214 SOIL BORINGS DATE: Proposed Street Improvements, Eaglewood 5-31-84 Addition SCALE: 1"=4' Shakopee, 1' BORING: _ LOCATION: Station _?+-�0 BORING: LOTION: B-8 i���CAr Station SURF. ELEV: Bridge crossing 10" ' SUR V: Eaglewood lane 10' 956.5 left of centerline 955.0 R g t f ceriterline nest Depth Descr ion oTM erials p WL Det Dea;cr ion o terials WL 12" Class 5 1 3/4" Bituminous a, 7 3/4 '6' Class 5 0 1 SILTY SANDY CLAY, medium CL ° SILTY SANDY CLAY, medium plasticity, with a trace ° plasticity, with a trace CL of fine to medium Gravel, of fine Gravel, black and olive and gray, moist to " 2� brown, moist. wet. (Fill) 01 SILTY SANDY CLAY, medium > u plasticity, olive and CL a brown, moist to wet. $4 4 v 'o SILTY CLAY, medium plas- CL c ticity with a trace of ca fiber, black, wet. C 0 L co r-1 tb 7 Q) - 0 W L .� SILTY SANDY CLAY, medium CL w plasticity, gray, wet. 10 10 ro b tz Water level down 8 ' Aj, immediately after with- Water level down 4' drawal of auger, immediately after with- drawal of auger. Boring immediately back- filled. Water level down 3' 4 o days after completion of C6 a boring. a� v LOG OF BORINGS �U� PROJECT: 84-214 SOIL BORINGS DATE: 5/31/84 Proposed Street Improvements, Eaglewood Addition SCALE: 1„=4 , BORING: B-9 LOCATION: Station 8+00 BORING: LOCATION: SURF. ELEV: Eagle Wood Lane 10' Rt. SURF. E EV: 952.5 of Centerline, between Depth Descr ion o er is Is p WL Depth' et Descr ion oTV ter is Is WL 2” Bituminous _ 0�0 12" Class 5 4 14" SANDY CLAY, medium CL plasticity, brown, moist. 7 W (Fill) 4 a v m v v 51 a co SILTY SANDY CLAY, low CL a plasticity, black, 0 6 moist to wet. -14 cin SILTY SANDY CLAY, low plasticity, grayish browi , CL a wet. > a� 0 w " 9 SILTY CLAYEY SA=, fine a to medium-grained, brown.. SC-SM ti 10 wet. �4 b G Water level down 6' immediately after withdrawal of auger. b a `o Water level down 5�' 4 „ days after completion of o boring. a a� *Co. Rd. 17 and Eaglewood a� Drive. a� TEST REPORT ON EXPANSION AND RESISTANCE VALUE OF SOILS Project 84-214 Date 6/19/84 Location Boring #5 Depth 1_91 Textural Class CLAY LOAM Max. Density 108.4 Opt. Moist. 19.4 AASHO GrouD A-6 r rouo Index - Date Rec'd. 5/31/84 Liouid Limit - Plastic Index - % Sand 35.6 q Silt 29.8 % Clav 30.1 A Moisture at compaction In: 19.3 20.8 19.0 RS - Value (Corrected) : 10 9 12 Exudation Pressure (P.S. I . ) : 310 175 400 Exoansion Pressure (P.S. I . ) : 0.33 Cl 0 40 35 #t 30 25 20 15 10 5 - - I T- 1 ' 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 Exudation Pressure (°.S. I. ) At a pressure of 240 psi The R-Value = 9 BRAIIN ENrINEERINr TESTINr,, INC. James M. Samuelson i Sr. 'engineering Assistant LABORATORY MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATION Project No. 84-214 Sample No. Boring #5 Date Tested 6/12/84 Bag Sample #5 Proctor ASTM D: - 78 Method: UNIFIED SOILS CLASSIFICATION: (ASTM D2487 & D2488) MAXIMUM DENSITY: 108.4 OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT: 19.4 111 IIIJill Ill JIM I I 109 Ili i if i l11 t j I 107 ZERO AIR VOIDS I i Sp. Gr. = 2.70 lillill Jill Ili / 11111 11W U H 105 � 1 z � w Q I I r rx _ n 103 Vill JillI 101Jill 11 Ill I I Ill If Jill IIIIIII � I I 99 13 15 17 19 21 23 MOISTURE CONTENT, ----=--====== -------- ___-__ ------- -- --- sss-c===_ -_ •-_----_--_--__rrrr--_r_rN_rr�=r r- ----- - -rN--N�-aNr••N—r N�� aiialN�. -r- ------------ 1• -rMrrilrr!_� Nim- SES BE ^.ii►.iilNlii!!N!!liiilN !!i!!!!liNi!! !! !N! � .rrrNN.rriaNraNr— � --_--___------------ -------------- a__cESME_ Ji}�i=-1iNlN NIN_Ni_N_ !_ s!w --------- ----- N--- -------------- ——� • • —rrilr!!ra rrrrlrlrrlr- 1--rlir!!!r- -r-r-- MM �•� OEM!— !Ni iililiilNli!!!i!!!i!!! l���!!i!!liiN !! ! • ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\■■■■■ MOMMEMMENEMSEM SOONER ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■/ rlNN! -Mi ir--rrr!• ••r!!!-lN-r r-M f Now moo= i!!N!!!MNl��lw—!r!�_ �rrlNrrNrr r.._—_ • ii11����illNiiMi !N!!iN •rwarrN--rrNiTi!-' N ��•�!!-irNliN-Nill�ir � i!NlNlrrl��N- ••ilii!!lNNiNlNli!!! =N�!!Ni!lNiliNNlt ...■......l....■....... .■■■�.■■...... .■...■. ■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■Eu■■■■■ ■■■■i.■■■■■■■■■ ■■ ■■ --_ - _ _ ------=� ---__Emmmmm= == -_-_=__ ==- • o - ---------- ==MEMO= --_---■■MEMO ■ ■■■ Room ■ • • i-- ---- I-- -- - �- --_- .-L.-�-.rte---_C�•�-����i-�=� N _N�Niriil===------ N_ i __ -i ----r-riNilNl_ llirilliiii iiilrrilri!lNiilN_f +_N••!N-N__iNN__l__!_ N_NiIN_lil/lllN_N ffN!lffNfffflffN!!f!f !fflNf__f-ffNffNNf l rir!_ _rNirNi __- !N�l���l;NNl�NiNN �N■EM�M/■■■NMpONNNMNM NINE■■■NN//N■■■MN /M�■/�O/O////NN///MON • iiMi■Aiiii■iiiiMNEiMiNMi ■ENEili iE"NUMEROUS Manama //r/o ■■■■■ —EEESES �_��-_ _---- ----__-_---_-_-_ --- --- _ ' �NirN__i_!_i•.--NNr_!r_ ---------- ------- -rN-s=!illilllii rr rilil_illi_l •!_lllii!liil_____i__Ni _ __ !! _ilial�_lN_ �ll_lliili_!_.�_l_l_il_l_ -rill ____l_!__fN • ffNlf!!!ff!•.-_f!!f_!-! l.tYi_lll_ _!!!!lffNff tflffffffflff�fffffffff! ��lll_!!l�_iNNfffN! ilffff!!lffffl.�lf!!!f!f! !i!!fflflrlfff!!flNN • IN/////////�//1i/////// ��/n� ////f/N/////////// / / • /NN/////N/N'����/N // //////// ////NN _ ■■MNOman■MNMO.i■■E■ON ■■/■/■/■■■/�■■■/■■/p ii■■■EM■■■Eiiii■\�i■Oti ■ii■iM■SEEMS i■EE■OEE■■ • ■■■■■■■NEEM■■■■EENNE■■■ ■■■■■■WEEN■■■■■■■NEMEE. db==_=_-==_==_= n NlNINMMM_M__ NMf� Mf__M���i-!N •• NlMNNNlfffNlff iNfffN�flfff fNNfMfffNlNlfNf Vlfffflf�NlNlf -NfffNfNlflflff! NNlNlff ffNN // /N//N////NNN NNEN■■■■■ONNi■■O/ N■■■■■ ■N�N■pp ■■■■■N■■■■■t■■■■■i■■■■ ■■■■MONO■■■■■■i■■Ni■■ iiiMiiiM■iiiiiE■■■ti■ iiMOM/ii■MEEii■■■■E■EW -■N■At■■MSM_____—___- MM�'�M�uo�iM�■E-:: • - -- - _ -�N-N�r•�a���-�=-Nra • ===--=---=------===—== =========_ ======_ • - r!!!N_NM_N__i NNrNr.•il__rilN - _!_ll__Nl!!lNNfN__l l_l!_l__IINNNN!_N NNMlN_�.ffffM_!f!_ l!_ll____l N!lffNN-_- NNNlN !NNlIpN _flfff!!f-lfffff!!!!!f! !lffN��lflffNlf ffflf fffff!lNfNlNffff •'N�Hf!! ///// I///// //O//N//mamma nownsommoon N/ inn ■ ■O■ M■■■i■ i/iM■ ■ �M ■ DESCRIPTIVE TERMINOLOGY PARTICLE SIZE IDENTIFICATION SOIL INTRUSIONS Boulders over 7' THICKNESS RELATIVE PROPORTIONS Gravel ense 0- 1/8" with a few 0-10% Coerso 1" — 3" ream 1/8——t" with some 11 —20% Medium 1/2" — 1" syer 1"—12" with over 20% Fine No.4 — 1/7' varved alternating seams or Send lenses of clays and Coarse No. 4—No. 10 silts in lake deposit Medium No. 10—No.40 Fine No.40— No.100 MOISTURE CONTENT ORGANIC CONTENT Very Fine No. 100—No.200 Silt No.200— .005 mm Dry less than 5% 0-5% non to slightly organic Day less than .005 mm Hoist under optimum moisture 6- 10% slightly organic Net over optimum moisture 11 —25% organic /Vaterbearing saturated sand 26-65% muck 65+ peat RELATIVE DENSITY OF CON:31STENCY OF PLASTICITY OF SOILS WITH COHESION LESS SOILS COHESIVE SOILS LESS THAN 20% CLAY very loose 0— 4 BPF very soft 0— 1 BPF non plastic gritty,cannot thread loose 5— 10 BPF soft 2— 3 BPF slightly plastic rough to smooth, medium dense 11 —30 BPF rather soft 4 — 5 BPF hard to thread dense 31 —50 BPF medium 6— 8 BPF plastic smooth to waxy, very dense 50+ BPF rather stiff 9— 12 BPF easy to thread stiff 13-- 16 BPF very stiff 17 — 30 BPF hard 30+ BPF RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF GRAVEL LABORATORY TESTS a trace 0— 5% DD Dry Density,pcf OC Organic Content,% a little 6- 15% WD Wet Density.pd S Percent of Saturation,% some 16-30% MC Nat iral Moisture Content,% SG Specific Gravity and 31 —50% LL Liquid Limit,% C Cohesion PL Plastic Limit,% 0 Angle of Internal Friction PI Plasticity Index,% qu Unconfined Compressive Strength I DRILLING NOTES: Standard penetration test borings were advanced by 2%/ or 314" J.D. hollow-stem augers unless noted other- wise.Jetting water was Lsed to clean out auger prior to sampling only where indicated on logs. Standard penetration test borings are designated by the prefix "ST" (Split Tube). Power auger borings were advanced by 4"or 6"diameter,continuous-flite,solid stem augers. Soil classification and strata depths are infitrred from disturbed samples augered to the surface and are therefore somewhat approximate. Power auger borings are designated by the prefix "B". Hand probings were advanced manually with a 1X"diameter probe and are limited to the depth from which the probe can be manually withdrawn. Hand probrngs are indicated by the prefix "H". CLASSIFICATION: Classification on logs is riade by inspection in accordance with the Unified Soils Classification System (me attached chart) using visusi-manual procedures unless noted otherwise. GROUND WATER: Observations were made at the times indicated.Porosity of soil strata,seasonal weather conditions,site topography,etc.,may cause changes in the water levels indicated on the logs. SAMPLING: - All samples are taken with the standard 2"0.D.split-tube sampler,except where noted.TW indicates thin- well undisturbed sample. BPF: Numbers indicate blows:]!r foot recorded in standard penetration test,also known as "N"value. The sampler is set 6"into undisturbed soil below the hollow-stern auger. Driving resistances are then counted for second and third 6"increments 4nd added to get BPF. Where they differ significantly,they are reported in the following form—2/12 for the second and third 6"increments respectively. WH: WH indicates that sampler penetrated soil under weight of hammer and rods alone,driving not required. NOTE: All tests run in accorderns with applicable ASTM standards. El M U n UNIFIED SYSTEM CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES ASTM DESIGNATION D-2487 Group Typical Major Divisions Symbols Nacres Classification Criteria Well-graded gravels and C = D /D GW gravel-sand mixtures, u BO 10 Greater than 4 c little or no fines CZ = D(D X✓2 Between 1 and 3in iA 0` o "; Poorly graded gravels and N q.- �� GP gravel-sand mixtures, Not meeting both criteria for G✓ ;. _a a i o little or no fines > ` 0 a o Atterberg limits lot 0 w� o c oo c� o o Silty ravels, gravel- 9 P fltoz a CEJ �� ,� GM sand-silt mixtures below ."A" line or Atterberg limits plot- o, ," c Ln S �, plasticity index ting in hatched area 4M1 c � v, z q b•; less than 4 are borderline ate, N 0 L ; a Clayey gravels, gravel- tterberg imps p of classifications re- 4.s v GC sand-clay mixtures above A line and quiring use of dual a , ,o Q i plasticity index symbols r.. Lu m M greater than 7 0 +� Well-graded sands and Cu = D60 10 4 a, > �D Greater than 6 'A a�' a SW gravelly sands, little a �c ov or no fines C = (D-3nJ2 �o >u D un 4 > a M Z D10 X DBO Between 1 and 3 6r o N 0 0.0 a vV) Poorly graded sands and to o A 0 0 gravelly sands, little Not meeting both criteria for SW ;, z z"' L or no fines q (n q z J 'n Silty sands, sand-silt Atterberg limits plot a V c N N SM mixtures below "A" line or Atterberg limits plot- "nn � a, •o 41 N a, plasticity index less ting in hatched area '! a b. than 4 are borderline clas- " bIPR H s" SC Clayey sands, sand-clay Atterberg emits p of sifications requiring :5+o mixtures above "A" line and use of symbols 0 +� plasticity index a)LA greater than 7 Inorganic silts, rock flour, Silty or clayey fine sand "_E Inorganic c ays o _70-wt o a u cmedium plasticity, gray- 60 plasticity chart > elly clays, sandy clays, a� in a ae For cZaseification of fine- ++ a,Ln silty clays, lean cls s �+ ^• � y 50 grained eoiZs and fine fraction C:$ ;;,-' Organi c si 1 is and organi a of coarse-grained soils. O CA N OL silty clays of low �k Atterberg Zimite plotting in CH o plasticity 40 hatched area are C; borderline N a classifications requiring z use of dual symbols. W Inorganic silts, mi caceous .� 30 Equation of A-tine . 0) W c or diatomaceous silts, pl= 0.73 (LL-20 CL cS_ a q 41Ln elastic silts 20 V E C a, L = Inorganic clays of high w Aff OR ;i F r_ 4J Qi plasticity, fat clays 19 _ L. LM :3a)) 4 o q 11 0 N J L Organic clays of medium 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 g0 100 L0 o' OH to high plasticity Liquid limit Peat, snuck and other Highly organic soils pt highly organic soils Visual-manual identification 11M Hil ENGINEERING TESTING: RESOLUTION N0. 2381 l� A Resolution Receiving A Report And Calling A Hearing On Improvement Of Roadway Serving Lets Of Record In Eaglewood 1st, 2nd, And 3rd Additions And Certain Unplatted Property In Section 31 And Section CL, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 22E5 of the City Council ad rated May 22, 19B4, a rep;rt has been prepared by Ray RS- uska, Encineerin^ Coordinator, with reference to t he improvements of the Eagl.ew_od Subdivision Roadways, and this report was received by the Council on March 15, 1985. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of Roadways in accordance with the report and the asse=ssment of aD tting and benefitted property for all or a, portion of the cost of the improvements pursuan;, to Minnesota Statutes Cha^ter" 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of 5257, 2S7. 00. 2. A public hearing small be neld on such proposed improvements on the 16th day of April, 19x5, at 8:00 P. M. , or thereafter, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, at 1E1 East 1st Avenue and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as rec t;i red by law. 3. The work k of this project is hereby designated as part of the 1965_2 Public improvement Program. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this ciay of 1S Mayor of tete City of Shakopee - ATTEST: City Clerk -�� Approved as to form this may of City Pt t ohne> .J INCORPORATED 1870 * ENC*INEERING DEPARTMENT 129 E. 1st Avenue - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650 MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, FROM: City Administrator Ray Ruuska, En9ineering Eagl SUBJECT- Coordinator Feasibil _ ewood Feasibility Report DATE: March 1419 1985 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. receivin 2,581, Pertaining to City in the EaglewoodrSubdCouncil ivisjothe easibility of Roadway Improvements BACKGROUND: Resolution No. 2265 of the Cit ordered a Feasibilit Y Council, dated May 22, 1984, Y Report an the above, named project. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2381, A Resolution Receiving v i n And Calling A Hearing On Improvement Of Roadway g A Report Of Record In Eaglewoad 1st, Servin Unplatted property In Sec t :ionn31) And 3rd Additi 9 Lots 1 And Sect ion 32ons And Cert aci n Range 22, Scott County, M i r'naso a. Township 1 1 AP for Submittal er H. R. Sr Ti RR/pmp , City Engineer MEM2;587 y _ I C2TY_CyF ._SH_AKOPE� INCORPORATED 1870 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT +� 129 E. 1st Avenue - Shakopee, !Minnesota 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650 MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrat • FROM: IH. R. Spurrier, City Engineer SUBJECT: Fourth Avenue, County Road 83 to She d ah Drive DATE: March 15, 1985 INTRODUCTION: The City of Shakopee must acquire right-of-way along Fourth Avenue between County Road 83 and Shenandoah Drive. This part of Fourth Avenue is an the Municipal State Aid System. Right- of-way for Municipal State Aid Streets must be acquired in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 117. 50 - 117. 56 which incor- porates Public Law 91-646, Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. BACKGROUND: This state law specifies that in acquiring right-of-way, the Jurisdiction must first negotiate in good faith with the prop- erty owner to reach a settlement, then if that process is unpro- ductive the Jurisdiction may exercise its powers of eminent domain. The City of Shakopee policy specified in Resolution No. 1643 and amended by Resolution No. 1760 specified that the condem- nation procedure begin immediately without that negotiating step. In order to bring City policy in conformance with Public Law 91-646 and Minnesota Statutes 117. 50 - 117. 56 it is recommended that the City Council adopt attached Resolution No. 2386, A Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 1643 as amended and adopt- ing a policy for the City of Shakopee concerning the condem- nation of easements, right-of-way, and land needed for the installation of public improvement. The alternative action that could be taken by City Council would be to waive the requirements of Resolution No. 1643 as amended for right-of-way acquisition on Fourth Avenue. Memorandum/Fourth Avenue March 15, 1985 Page 2 If the second course of action were taken, it would leave the present City policy in conflict with Public Law 91-646 and Minnesota Statutes 117. 50 - 117. 56 thereby exposing the City to unnecessary litigation. ACTION REQUESTED : A motion to adopt Resolution No. 2386, A Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 1643 and Adopting a Policy for the City of Shako- pee Concerning the Condemnation of Easements and Land Needed for the Installation of Public Improvement. HRS/pmp MEM2386 RESOLUTION NO. 2366 A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 1643 AS AMENDED AND ADOPTING A POLICY FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE CONCERNING THE CONDEMNATION OF EASEMENT AND LAND NEEDED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1643 as amended is in conflict with Public Law 91-6.46 Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, and Minnesota Statutes 117. 50 - 117. 56, which covers the acquisition of property where State or Federal funding is used ; and --- - WHEREAS, this act assures that the property owner receive the fair market value of the property the City would acquire; and WHEREAS, it was the goal of City Council to treat all property owners fairly and uniformly; and WHEREAS, the acquisition process specified in Minnesota Statutes 117. 50 - 117. 56 provides for the fair and uniform treatment of property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA; that Resolution No. 1643 and Resolution 1760 which adopt a Policy concerning condemnation of easements and land needed for the installation of public improvement are hereby rescinded. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: that City staff is directed to conform to Public Law 91-646, Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 972, and Minnesota Statutes 117. 50 - 117. 56 whenever the City must acquire easements, right-of-way, or land needed for the installation for audlic purpose. Adopted in session of the CiCityCouncil of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of 19 Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to i f I Irm this Cay of -' -5 i --_....�. City Attorney RESOLUTION NO . 1760 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO . 1643 , WHICH ADOPTS A POLICY CONCERNING CONDEMNATION OF EASEMENTS AND LAND NEEDED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INPROVEMENTS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA, that Resolution No . 1.643 , Which Adopts a Policy Con- cerning Condemnation of Easements and Land Ncedcd for the Installa- tion of Public Improvements , be and hereby is amended by substituting the following paragraph for the seventh paragraph contained therein: "BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution does not pre- clude the City staff from negotiating a fair and equitable set- tlement with any or all property owners while the condemnation process is under way a.nd the staff is directed to bring to the City Council any negotiated settlement which may be reached and if these settlements are approved by the City Council the con- demnation action shall be discontinued . " Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee , Minnesota , held this day of ; 1980. Mayor or " the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Cit C I e pproved as to form this day of — ----, 1980 City At45rney 1\:.JVLU11V1\ INU . _LU-+J A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A POLICY FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE CONCERNING THE CONDEMNATION OF EASEMENTS AND LAND NEEDED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS the Shakopee City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to construct public improvement in a timely and efficient manner as requested by property owners and or determined by the City Council . WHEREAS the City Council realizes tha-t some public improvement projects require the acquisition of easements or fee title to land for public improvement. WHEREAS the negotiations for the needed easements and fee titles require a large amount of staff time and effort which may not be suc- cessful and which may delay the project . f WHEREAS Minnesota State Statutes authorize the City of Shakopee to condemn the needed easements or fee title and whereas their pro- cedure provides a uniform and fair method for determining the value of .easements or fee title to land needed for public improvement . I WHEREAS the condemnation procedure assures the City of a date when the needed easements for property will be available to begin construction of the public improvements needed. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED OF THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL that the City staff is directed to present to the City Council the appropriate resolution to begin condemnation on any easement or property needed for any public improvement as soon after the project is ordered as feasible BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution does not pre- clude the City staff for negotiating a fair and equitable set- tlement with any property owner while th-e condemnation process is under way and the staff is directed to bring to the City Council any negotiated settlement which may be reached and if these settlements are approved by the City Council the condemnation action shall be discontinued .