HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/17/1984MEMO TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Admin.
RE: Non -Agenda Informational Items
DATE: July 12, 1984
a 1, �L�� ;r,; a 7P11 ar A_trc3rn2v
'L J 1 have 'Dep -TI Se'L`vcu a
for the Luebke's who have claimed $7,000.00 in damage for
the sewer back-up. They had appeared before Council to
discuss it. The matter has been turned over to Rod Krass.
YJ Attadhea 'is a memo `Iron 'MuLnflhfow 1' gW uLnrg -+-n_
accident in the parking lot at Lions Park.
31 Attached is an excerpt from the minutes of the June 13,
1984 MWCC meeting. Please note item 20.3 regarding leasing
of the NWCC owned farm land in Sha'kopee.
FC` 7 tVii
4'1' ECL�aCC1eQ i's- a- IIi-t�ITCS � t vim uif2I' ,3tai. "'
regarding comparable worth.
51 Attached is a letter from Representative Bill Frenzel re-
garding legislation affecting Industrial Development Bonds
(IDB's).
61 Attached is the Summer Newsletter of Springsted, Inc.
7] Attached are the June 21, 1984 minutes of the Shakopee
Coalition.
8] Attached are the June 7, 1984 minutes of the Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission.
91 Attached are the minutes of the June 7, 1984 meeting of
the Board of Adjustments and Appeals.
10] Attached are the minutes of the June 7, 1984 meeting of
the Shakopee Planning Commission.
11] Attached is the Tentative Agenda for the Energy and Trans-
portation Committee.
121 Attached are the minutes of the Energy and Transportation
Committee, dated May 31, 1984.
131 Attached are the minutes of the Energy and Transportation
Committee, dated June 21, 1984.
14] Attached is a letter from the State of Minnesota Dept. of
Natural Resources.
151 Attached is the Revenue Report as of 6-30-84.
JKA/bn
��U�ZIIpEE (�IIUtU1UUtf�1 �EiUtCE.�
129 Levee Drive
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Phone 445-2742
Community Education • Parks • Recreation • Adult Education
George F. Muenchow, Dir.
July 112 1981
Memo To John Anderson
Subject.... Accident Lions Park Parking Lot....F.Y.I.
Earlier this afternoon this young lad rode his bicycle,
evidently in a fast manner, into the parking lot of
Lions Park traveling along the bicycle path from 10th
Avenue and crashed into a moving automobile. Except for
calling the authorities the Swimming Pool Staff wasntt
that much involved, but we supply this information
nevertheless.
George F. Muenchow
A C -0 -OPERATIVE -EFF -ORT -OF THE DITY9F�hIAKDP-EE AND-SCH-O- Ll?ISTRLCT 720 -SINCE 1954
SI AKOPEE C0 ,lr1MITY SERVICES
PEI'.SOMU INJURY REPORT FOR 4
Name of Injured ���� r% Age.
Address
Date of Accident / '` I m Time /
Place of Accident
Description of. Accident j
Names w Addresses of '.Jitnesses
Did you witness the accident?—,.—,�
'Jas medical aid necessary?
IJas First Aid given?
First Aid given by whom?A {
Descroption of First Aid Given. '
Removed to hospital b-e�Fiom
Name of attending phusician)
1J=e & Addresses of person(s) responsible for accident.
Name of Persons notified (family, parents
11as ambulance called ".Jho called ambulance , C�
& 1 t
Signature oma
f Person king report �" .> .: X'd a
abate of react - 1
Additional Information:
..u...«."a.--s•.+>aw°.++�JN+s.»ter .a..m., .-. a.+r r.. ...-....-...M..e..xb..a.+Y..».�-�...a..�.r.:m �w .e..Pa+.+-.+. .s+.w .......w .s..tl�.yaaW..d
- <.eII.M®•ei�•.w�wri " a�•a..r. .s r. a+! a'(�rdw.V#'.i�M4L�nFv-w..r.aiF•1e.w>a w..+..wtW ��. M.•-..».Vrsr�•.+ns �.
-ww•..�r..t.sa...ww.,...,�.+_....w ...a�.w�,.�,w o.s �ae�. n.-c�.soe.•�r•. �.r�,.-....w-m.a. ..w+•_.
OiL In aolltqt %ek
• M'M"• a -.,Mur �c..w ypr�m.wWyYw�wamw•wr•w.. a>.» was�iaaw•�+M•�+s.•.i•.r.«t-y...a-�tq�Rt��r.r.ltircw-. ..ila +w�.a... .r .+v--+^i
..m..cr.?++.�wi�ema.:i+>-.....-..+-li.+•Aab�x-=-ra.�e lt-�.r..►artne.srt'!^�- . �•u,w..w.. +r.e ..-arii'�'+Ws•:s�,�e��di*�it
.....,...wwtw.+ww�w-r,.r+.+s,. e -...v m.,yw-.. ....n.n.., .,..°...ws>...zwe=.wi-a.s....rr:rr--•�.p+kM.+aw.•+r�►w.....:mst-.. t.+. .r �..... s»sw�.+r'"+.....-°w ..-r�»„s.>». �:.:+w...w «+w,-aav
..R.v}•.aru„ wr►mm.y.se wrw.®.w.a ,....a .. m r ..+no+reu• es..,r�x. =w+..atm .w>r�wsu.,�. ,..«�...•wr.. .x s+rws.»c aL u isat iil � 1
wrw.ar+r.:+.wa�,...*.- �-:...a...> +..+bra-+�*+r.ss�►•am�r.v_.�„r+f...-i :..s-,.. �.. ..r...-...wsw..�.-_ar•...� «-..�.... - +�. - .
.+..+-*•y-rsw....wve-.M...>.yerype.w,.s.
r++wwl.w-.�rrsw<r-�.,a aw. r �cw..rw�s.a. �rr . ...awr°.r s�.. m-.. w.a s s ....w..+re w ..:.,,m .•.mow ... +.. m ,
mow... -«.+e «ar...,.. ,. s..• ..a. mom.. .a. . a t.s- : 1 S ` ' iiQri $ u u'` : + �$'. UOX
w . � . _,•......was+�,s-....� s .. ..m.r w .� ,.
xd
-+1SM»s.da.: -. .: _. VFwt .Mw;9nw+wlw.>•.. s.M �JY41r \•Aw.m6��. ��.�» y �y.♦
y«
�:s-w,+-sm„<.�rs i�.�Vs.a�r�la�Mpir►e»�M�++•�wf .rdwRillR�. �ye�.g - _-.�}.x q�� Q,�w yy
..� �.�,.,,..,�,_"yam ... ���.:.-....�...�...r>........ a� _ _ ;.,.,..:_.,.�...�>a.-:.,..�..�.,.�.,�...;....m.__,...... ,.�...�.•5,.
M E T R O P O L I T A N W A S T E C 0 N T R 0 L C O M M I S S I O N
350 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
222-8423
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
June 13, 1984
4:00 p.m.
FART T. - NARRATIVE
A regular meeting of the Operations Committee was held at 4:00 p.m.
on Wednesday, June 13, 1984, at the Commission Offices. Roll was called and
the following Committee Members were in Attendance:
Present: Chairman Bruce Baumann, Carol Kummer, Patrick Roedler and
Judy Fletcher
Absent: George Frisch
Staff: Louis J. Breimhurst, Deputy Chief Administrator
Mark D. Thompson, Legal Counsel
Mary J. Heinisch, Spec. Assistant to Chief Administrator
Louis J. Bartscher, Deputy Director of Operations/Metro
John A. Almo, Deputy Director of Operations/Maint.
W. A. Blain, Director of Operations
Bryce Pickart, Process Manager, Operations
Paula Duffield, Operations Coordinator
Rick Arbour, Interceptor Systems Manager
C. Ray Payne, Acting Director of Engineering
Donald R. Madore, Deputy Director of Quality Control
Robert Polta, Quality Control, R & D Manager
Helen Boyer, Quality Control, Water Qual. Monitoring Manager
Jim Corcoran, Program Manager, Laboratory Services
Jean E. Bergal, Public Information Officer
Bill Moeller, Area Manager
Dick Ottman, Staff Engineer
William G. Moore, Engineering Manager
Tim Keegan, Staff Engineer
Lynn Breitbarth, Safety Officer
Donald Bellfield, Asst. Affirmative Action Officer
Lou Ai: T.. Staeheli. Executive Secretary
Guests: Ben Franklin, Vice Pres., Hoffmann Electric
Thomas J. Kolias, President, Hoffmann Electric
Dennis R. Martenson, Engineer, TKDA
Bill Riser, President, Riser Electric
Dick Barrett, Pres., Local 35
Richard W. Smith, Legal Counsel, Commonwealth Elec. Co.
Paul Manns, Project Mgr., EMA
Earl North, Ex-V.Pres, Commonwealth Electric
Other Unregistered Guests
M E T R O P O L I T A N W A S T E C 0 N T''R 0 L C,O M M I S S I 0 N
350 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
222-8423
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
June 13, 1984
4:00 p.m.
EXHIBITS
84-228. Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Adver-
tise for Bids for MW4,'TP Quality Control Department Facilities,
MWCC Proj. No. 83-65-467.
84-229. Authorization to Transmit NPDES Permit Report for May, 1984.
84-230. Authorization to Prepare Lease Documents and to Advertise for
Bids for Lease of MWCC Owned Farmland
84-231. Authorization to Prepare Specification and to Advertise for Bids
for Off -Gas Analysis Equipment.
84-232. Monthly Report on Amended Stipulation Agreement
84-234. Authorization to Advertise for Bids, Granular Activated Carbon,
Rosemount Plant
84-235. Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Advertise
for Bids, MWWTP Scum Incinerator Feed System, MWCC Proj. 81-65-389.
84-236. Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Advertise
for Bids, Chaska Outfall Improvements, MWCC Proj. 83-65-476.
84-237. Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Advertise
for Bids, MWWTP R & D Laboratory Facility, Proj. 83-65-474.
84-238. Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Advertise
for Bids, Interim Improvements at Anoka WWTP, Proj. 83-65-475.
84-239. Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Advertise
for Bids, Seneca Ash Disposal Project.
84-240 Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Advertise
for Bids, Empire "TP Improvements.
NO REPORTS GIVEN
CERTIFICATION
Louis J. Breimhurst
Deputy Chief Administrator
LS
7.2.84
Minutes - Operations Committee June 13, 1984
Page 2
Chairman Baumann presented the agenda for today's meeting
advising that 84-233 should be deleted; 84-241 should be deleted; item
E should be Status Report on Maple Plain NPDES Permit and Report, item
F will be Informational Presentation on Right to Know Legislation.
Mr. Roedler moved approval of
today's agenda as amended. Ms.
Fletcher seconded. Motion
carried.
19 MINUTES
Chairman Baumann presented the Committee Meeting minutes for
May 9, 1984.
Mr. Roedler made a motion to ap-
prove the minutes of the meeting
of the May 9, 1984 meeting. Mr.
Siebenaler seconded. Motion carried.
20 BUSINESS
20.1 Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization
to Advertise for Bids for M1,A4TP Quality Control Depart-
ment Facilities, IGICC Proj. No. 83-65-467. Dr. Johnson
presented this item for consideration. Blue prints were exhibited showing the
various areas which he described and considerable discussion ensued. A tour of
the facility has been suggested.
Ms. Kummer moved approval of Resolu-
tion 84-228, recommending that it not
be placed on the Consent Agenda. Ms.
Fletcher seconded. Motion carried.
20.2 Authorization to Transmit NPDES Permit Report for May,
1984. 84-229. Dr. Johnson presented this item for
consideration.
Mr. Roedler moved approval of RESolu-
tion 84-229. Ms. Kummer seconded.
Motion carried.
20.3 Authorization to Prepare Lease Documents and to Adver-
tise for Bids for Lease of MWCC Owned Farmland 84-230
Dr. Polta presented this item for consideration. Con-
siderable discussion ensued regarding the ownership of this property, and the
original intent for this property. Ms. Fletcher recommended only a 2 yr.period
without the option for the third year.
Ms. Fletcher moved approval of Resolu-
tion 84-230, recommending that it not
be placed on the Consent Agenda. Ms.
Kummer seconded. Motion carried with
Mr. Siebenaler voting nay.
Minutes - Operations Committee
June 13, 1984
Page 3
20.4 Authorization to Prepare Specification and to Adver-
tise for Bids for Off -Gas Analysis Equipment 84-231
Dr. Polta presented this item for consideration.
Ms. Fletcher moved approval of
Resolution 8.4-231 for the Consent
Agenda. Ms. Kummer seconded.
Motion carried.
At this time the meeting was interrupted to conduct the Special Commission
Meeting scheduled for 5:00 p.m.
Approximately 6:30 p.m. the Operations Committee reconvened.
20.5 Monthly Report on Amended Stipulation Agreement
84-232. Mr. Blain presented this item for con-
sideration.
Ms. Fletcher moved approval of
Resolution 84-232. Ms. Kummer
seconded. Motion carried.
20.6 Authorization to Advertise for Bids, Granular
Activated Carbon - Rosemount Plant 84-234.
Mr. Blain presented this item for consideration.
Ms. Fletcher moved approval of
Resolution 84-234. Mr. Roedler
seconded. Motion carried.
20.7 _Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authoriza-
tion to Advertise for Bids, MWWTP Scum Incinerator
Feed System, MWCC Proj. No. 81-65-389. 84-235.
Mr. Payne presented this item for consideration.
Ms. Fletcher moved approval of
Resolution 84-235. Ms. Kummer
seconded. Motion carried.
20.8 Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authoriza-
tion to Advertise for Bids, Chaska Outfall Improve-
ments, MWCC Proj. 83-65-476. 84-236. Mr._Payne
presented this item for consideration.
Ms. -Kummer moved approvdi of
Resolution 84-236. Mr. Roedler
seconded. Motion carried.
20.9 Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authoriza-
tion to Advertise for Bids, MWWTP R & D Laboratory
Facility, MWCC Proj. 83-65-474. 84-237. Mr.
Payne presented this item for consideration. Discussion followed, with
Dr. Johnson explaining why this project is separate from 84-228.
Minutes - Operations Committee
June 13, 1984
Page 4
Ms. Kummer moved approval of Res-
olution 84-237 with recommendation
that it not be placed on the Consent
Agenda. Mr. Roedler seconded. Motion
carried.
20.10 Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization
to Advertise for Bids, Interim Improvements at Anoka
WWTP, Proj. 83-65-475. 84-238. Mr. Payne presented
this item for consideration.
Ms. Fletcher moved approval of Res-
olution 84-238 with recommendation
that it not be placed on the Consent
Agenda. Ms. Kummer seconded. Motion
carried.
20.11 Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization
to Advertise for Bids, Seneca Ash Disposal Project.
84-239. Mr. Moore presented this project for
consideration. It is hoped this project can be accomplished yet this fall.
Ms. Fletcher moved approval of Res-
olution 84-239. Mr. Roedler seconded.
Motion carried.
20.12 Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization
to Advertise for Bids, Empire WWTP Improvements 84-240.
Mr. Moore presented this project for consideration.
Ms. Fletcher moved approval of Res-
olution 84-240. Mr. Roedler seconded.
Motion carried.
21 REPORTS
Mr. Breimhurst advised that the balance of the Agenda was reports,
with the exception of the last item which was the presentation on Right -To -
Know Legislation. It was suggested that due to the lateness of the hour that
the Reports could be presented at a later time as well as the Presentation on
the Right -to -Know Legislation.
Mr. Breimhurst further advised that with regard to Item D - Status
Report on Compliance with Combined Sewer Overflow NPDES Permits, a law suit
had been discussed. It was suggested that a resolution would authorize the
Chairman and Deputy Chief Administrator to become a party to that law suit
in the name of the Commission.
22 ADJOURNMENT At approximately 7:30 p.m. without
objection, the meeting was adjourned.
Minutes - Operations Committee
PART II - EXHIBITS
PART III - CERTIFICATION
Approved this day of
Operations Committee.
LS
6.14.84
June 13, 1984
Page 5
Exhibits are attached to official
copies only.
I hereby certify that the foregoing
is a true and correct copy of the
June 13, 1984 Operations Committee
Meeting.
1984 by the
Louis J. Breimhurst
Deputy Chief Administrator
LIIII 1
U league of minnesota cities
July 5, 1984
TO: Mayors, Managers, and Clerks
FROM: Donald A. Slater, Executive Director
RE: Comparable Worth Status Report
The League of Minnesota Cities staff has been working on the new State of
Minnesota Comparable Worth law in order to be sure that all cities receive
equitable treatment and as much information as is possible to meet the
requirements imposed by the Legislature. This memorandum summarizes several of
the developments in this field.
The Department of Employee Relations which administers the Comparable Worth
legislation has established a city advisory committee, composed of elected and
appointed city officials from throughout Minnesota. This committee will meet
on July 12 in order to review materials which Commissioner Rothschild of the
Department of Employee Relations is assembling for utilization by city
employers. LMC will report the product of this meeting to all cities.
The Metropolitan Area Management Association is working on a program which
will, ultimately, produce proto-type job descriptions with point values for
approximately 15 benchmark city employment positions. The process is as
follows: MAMA has retained Labor Relations Associates to develop a request for
proposal to be distributed to potential consultants who would execute the
study. When the study is complete, this information would be distributed to
cities participating in funding the study so that they could evaluate jobs
within their own municipalities using the job descriptions and point systems
provided by the study. This would serve as a major tool in complying with the
requirements of the Comparable Worth law.
A number of metropolitan cities have joined in the financing of the work with
Labor Relations Associates. The Coalition of Outstate Cities has also joined
these efforts and other non -metropolitan communities may be interested in
participating. Current expectations are that the RFP phase of this work will
be relatively inexpensive but that when a consultant's proposal is reviewed and
accepted, costs could be considerably more. All cities participating in the
first phase of the study would retain the option to go their own way and not
contract for the consultant study which would eventually be developed.
Any city interested in joining this effort and need more information about it,
should contact the League office and speak with Joel Jamnik or me on this
subject.
1 83 university avenue east, st. W`� , �ninnesota 551 01 C6121227-5600
J Y
Mayors, Managers & Clerks
Page 2
July 5, 1984
League staff is working on a guide for complying with the Comparable Worth
legislation for cities under 5000 population, and we will distribute this
information directly to those cities.
The Department of Employee Relations has agreed to participate in the LMC
Regional Meeting program this year in each afternoon session, as well as in the
evening sessions, will have representatives of that agency discussing the
Comparable Worth legislation and its requirements. We will also have as much
information as the Department can provide available for distribution at the
Regional Meetings.
DAS:lw
Bit L FRENZEL
THIRD DISTRICT, MINNESOTA
WASHINGTON OFFICE:
1026 LONGWORTH BUILDING
202-225-2671
�Co gre�� of the aniteb btatto
Moue of Repreantatibefs
Wa0binatoli, Mc. 20515
July 2, 1984
MINNESOTA OFFICE;
MAYBETH CHRISTENSEN
Room 345
6120 PENN AVENUE SOUTH
BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431
512-661-4660
JUL - 9 1954
Mr. John K. Anderson
City Administrator CITY OF Si i `'```A`EE
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Because of your interest in legislation affecting tax-exempt mortgage revenue
bonds (MRB's) and tax-exempt industrial development bonds (TDB's), I wanted to
bring you up-to-date on the final Congressional action on these issues.
The Tax Reform Act of 1984, which recently passed the Congress as a part of the
deficit downpayment package, contains a provision which extends the MRB
program for four more years, until the end of 1987. This reauthorization of the
MRB program will enable thousands of first-time homebuyers to purchase their
own home.
The bill also contains provisions which place significant limitations on the use of
tax-exempt IDB's. The main limiting provision imposes a $150 per capita volume
cap on the amount of bonds that can be issued per year. In Minnesota, this
works out to approximately $600 million per year. Because, however, Minnesota's
1983 volume was above $150 per capita, Minnesota will receive additional authority
for 1984 only.
The cap is generally effective for bonds issued after January 1, 1984. An excep-
tion from the cap, however, is provided for bonds for which there was an
inducement resolution prior to June 19, 1984, so long as the bonds are issued
prior to the end of this year.
Additionally, bonds issued to finance convention or trade show facilities, airports,
docks, warves, and certain mass commuting facilities are generally exempt from
the cap if the facilities are owned for tax purposes by a state or local govern-
mental unit.
Depreciation deductions for IDB financed property are generally limited under the
bill to the straight-line method over ACRS lives. This restriction will not apply
to multi -family housing projects.
Other restrictions imposed on the use of tax-exempt IDB's include arbitrage
restrictions; limitations on the use of IDB's to purchase land and existing
facilities; the elimination of IDB financing for airplanes, stadium skyboxes,
gambling facilities, and health clubs (a transitional rule is provided for racetracks
where an inducement resolution was adopted prior to June 19, 1984); the elimina-
tion of IDB's to finance consumer loans; and new aggregation rules for small issue
IDB's.
THIS STATIONERY PRINTED ON PAPER MADE WITH RECYCLED FIBERS
-z -
Although there was general agreement that some action needed to be taken in
order to curb abuses of IDB's, in my judgment, the Tax Reform Act of 1984 is
too harsh. I am certain that some changes will need to be made in the future.
The transitional rule has fortunately been written so that almost all of the
projects that are currently in the pipeline will be able to proceed as scheduled.
I hope that this information will be of use to you. If you have any questions on
this, or any other provision in the Tax Reform Act of 1984, please let me know.
Yours very truly,
Bill Frenzel
Member of Congress
BF:dbr
Enclosure
BILLFRENZEL
THIRD DISTRICT, MINNESOTA
WASHINGTON OFFICE:
1026 LONGWORTH BUILDING
202-225-2871 Conaregg of tbt MaIYfteb *tate
3bouge of Repregentatibm
Wazbington, M.C. 20515
June 1984
MAJOR PROVISIONS OF THE TAX REFORM ACT OF 1984
TAX PROVISION PRIMARILY AFFECTING INDIVIDUALS
1. Net Interest Exclusion:
2. Maximum Estate Tax
3. Alcohol Excise Tax
MINNESOTA OFFICE:
MAYBETH CHRISTENSEN
Room 445
8120 PENN AVENUE SOUTH
BLOOMINGTON, MINNNESOTA 55431
612-881-4600
The provision enacted in 1981 permitting taxpayers
to exclude 150 of the net interest they earn starting
in 1985 has been repealed.
The maximum estate tax is frozen at the current 550
until 1988, when it will be reduced to 500.
The alcohol excise tax will be increased $2 per proof
gallon (aproximately 26� per fifth) on October 1, 1985.
4. Telephone Excise Tax: The telephone excise tax which was scheduled to
expire on January 1, 1986 is extended through
December 31, 1987.
5. Like -kind Exchanges: Rules have been provided which require a like -kind
exchange transaction to be completed within a six-month period, and that
the new property be identified within 45 days of the sale of the original
property.
6. Interest Free Loans: The bill provides that when an interest free loan is
made, the creditor will be deemed to. have income in the amount that the
creditor would have been paid had interest been charged at the statutory
rate. The debtor will be deemed to have paid the interest, and will re-
ceive a tax deduction for such interest deemed paid. Under the Dickman
case decided earlier this year, interest free loans can also give rise to
gift tax consequences. De minimus rules are provided for small loans.
A grace period is also provided to repay currently outstanding loans.
7. Business Use of Luxury Cars: The bill limits the amount of investment tax
credit that can be claimed with respect to any passenger automobile
used for business purposes to $1000, indexed for automobile inflation.
The maximum amount of depreciation that can be taken on any passenger
vehicle used for business purposes is $4000 in the first year, and a
maximum of $6000 in each year thereafter until the entire cost of the
vehicle has been recovered.
8. Business Use of Personal
Property,: Restrictions are imposed on the availability of business expense
deductions for personal use property to make sure that the property is
used predominately for business purposes. Record keeping requirements
have been strengthened.
9. Income Averaging: The averageable income threshold is increased from
1200 of average income to 1400 of average income.
10. Charitable Contributions: The limitation for the volunteer mileage deduction
is increased from 9� per mile to 12� per mile, effective January 1, 1985.
11. Domestic Relations Reforms: Property transferred incident to a divorce or
between spouses will not give rise to capital gains tax. The rules
defining alimony and child support have been clarified.
12. Pensions: Limitations are placed on welfare benefit plans (VEBA's).
Top heavy rules are provided to eliminate abuses.
13. Fringe Benefits: Permanent rules are provided which have the effect of
continuing the tax-exempt status of most normal employer provided
fringe benefits, including air travel for airline employees, free -parking,
tuition remissions, etc.
14. Cafeteria Employee Benefit Plans: The proposal generally rewrites the
Treasury Department's regulations with respect to cafeteria plans.
Special transitional relief is provided for section 125 plans which
were either in existence prior to the IRS press release, or for which
significant expenditures were made prior to the press release.
15. Mortgage Revenue Bonds: The mortgage revenue bond program has been
extended for four more years, through December 31, 1987. A new pro-
gram to assist first-time homebuyers has been enacted, known as Mortgage
Credit Certificates.
16. Gasohol: The tax exemption for gasohol is increased from 5¢ per gallon to
6¢ per gallon.
17. Targeted Jobs Tax Credit: The TJTC program has been extended for one
more year, until January 1, 1986.
18. Capital Gains Tax Holding Period: The holding period for long term capital
gains has been reduced from 12 months to 6 months for assets purchased
after June 22, 1984 and before January 1, 1988.
19. Employee Tips: The tip allocation rate for reporting purposes has been
amended to permit employees to petition to have the allocation rate reduced
from 5% to 20. Starting in 1986, tips will also be included as wages for -
purposes of the Federal Unemployment Tax Act.
20. Trust Provisions: Multiple trusts have effectively been prohibited where
the main purpose is tax avoidance. Changes have also been made in
the treatment of trust distributions of appreciated property.
21. Accounting Changes: Changes have been made with respect to premature
accruals, prepaid expenses, and deferred payments for use of property
and services.
II. TAX PROVISIONS PRIMARILY AFFECTING BUSINESSES
1. Tax Freeze: Expansion of the finance lease rules, increasing the amount of
property which may be expensed, increasing the amount of used property
eligible for the Investment Tax Credit, increasing the amount of income eli-
gible for the foreign earned income exclusion, has been delayed until 1988.
2. Tax-exempt Entity Leasing: The bill restricts the use of "sale- leaseback"
techniques between taxable and non-taxable entities as a means of
transferring unusable tax benefits. Exceptions are provided for "nor-
mal" transactions, and for certain short-term leases. Transitional
rules are provided.
3. Corporate Tax Provisions: The bill makes numerous changes in corporate
tax laws, including restrictions in the area of the dividends received
deduction for debt financed portfolio stock, the treatment of certain
dividends from regulated investment companies, the treatment of non -
liquidating distributions by corporation of appreciated property, short
sale expenses, stock for debt transactions, and several others.
4. Collapsible Corporations: The rules governing collapsible corporations have
been significantly tightened.
5. Corporate Graduated Tax Rates: The graduated tax rates are phased out
for corporations which earn more than $1 million per year, resulting in
these corporations paying tax at the highest marginal rate.
6. Golden Parachute Contracts: The deductions attributable to golden parachute
contracts are restricted.
7. Corporate Preference Item Tax: The special reduction in corporate preference
items is increased from 15% to 20o beginning in 1985.
8. Partnerships: Changes are made in the partnership tax law provisions re-
lating to exchanges of partnership interest, retroactive allocations, the
treatment of contributions of property, payments for services, transfers
of partnership interests by corporations, the allocation of liabilities to
partners, and others.
9. Life Insurance Company Taxation_ : The provisions of the Tax Code regard-
ing the taxation of the life insurance industry are completely rewritten
in order to more accurately reflect the practices in the modern life in-
surance industry.
10. Life Insurance Policyholder Provisions: Non-discrimination rules are imposed
on employer provided group term life insurance to retirees. Limitations
are placed on premature withdrawals of annuity contracts. No changes
are made in the treatment of policy -holder loans.
11. Foundations: Exemptions from the excise tax on investment income are pro-
vided in certain cases. The limitation on grant administrative expenses
is modified. The definition of disqualified person is amended to cut off
the limitation at great-grandchildren. Other changes are made to enable
foundations to better carry out their charitable function.
12. ESOP's: The ESOP provisions in the Tax Code have been expanded to
encourage ESOP formation.
13. Industrial Development Bonds: A $150 per capita cap has been placed
on the volume of bonds which can be issued in any year by any given
state. Limitations have been imposed to prohibit the use of bonds for
projects such as stadium skyboxes, liquor stores and other purposes.
A general transitional rule will exempt from the cap any project which
received its preliminary approval for the bonds prior to June 19th, if
the bonds are issued before the end of the year.
14. Technical Corrections: Technical corrections are made in the 1981 and 1982
tax bill=s, as well as the 1983 Social Security Amendments Act.
15. Truck Taxes: The $1,900 heavy vehicle use tax imposed on heavy trucks
has been repealed. The revenues have been replaced by an increase
in the diesel fuel tax of 6� per gallon, and a new maximum use tax of
$550. The increased diesel tax will not apply to passenger cars.
16. Foreign Tax Provisions: The bill contains provisions relating to the U.S.
sourcing rules, the factoring of foreign trade receivables, the source
of transportation income, original issue discount in the case of foreign
investors, and others.
The bill also repealed the 30o withholding requirement on portfolio
interest paid to foreign investors. Repeal is prospective only.
Also repealed is the requirement that information returns be filed under
the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act, so long as taxes are
withheld instead. Safeguards are written into the law to protect unsus-
pecting U.S. buyers, and an exception is provided for the sale of a
personal residence for $200,000 or less, and in other instances.
17. Foreign Sales Corporations: The bill generally replaces the current Domestic
International Sales Corporation (DISC) program with a new export program
known as Foreign Sales Corporations (FSC). FSC's will be foreign cor-
porations in order to comply with our treaty obligations. The deferred
income under the DISC will not, in most cases, be subject to tax. Special
rules are provided to help small businesses, either by granting them
exemptions from the foreign presence requirements, or by permitting
small businesses to keep their DISC and pay interest on the deferral.
The program will take effect starting next year.
21. Compliance: The bill contains numerous provisions designed to increase
compliance with our current tax laws without necessitating new taxes.
These provisions include tax shelter registration, requiring tax -shelters
to maintain promoter lists, increasing the penalty for the promotion of
abusive tax shelters, increasing the rate of interest for tax shelter cases,
requiring informational reporting for mortgage interest received in a
trade or business, and many other reporting requirements.
22. Depreciation: The bill increases the depreciation period for real property
from 15 years to 18 years, generally effective for property
placed in service after March 15, 1984. Numerous transi-
tbrmral, r;ldP4. --tC:R_ rprn141rLPrl...
c �„
MN Municipality
71Volume 1, Issue 4
THE S.1 LETTER'ummer 1984
/Z
Interest Rates
Taxable and tax-exempt interest rates have increased dramatically over the past several
months. The 20 -year Bond Buyer's Index was at 10.76 on June 28, compared with a 1984
low of 9.51 on February 2. Shorter term tax-exempt rates also are up sharply. "A" rated
general obligation bonds maturing in 1989 were yielding 8.6% this week compared to
7.45% in February. Many interest rate forecasts are for higher rates for the balance of
this year, with the potential for staying higher throughout 1985. Forecasters cite several
reasons for their pessimism including continued heavy deficit borrowing by the Federal
government, continuing heavy private credit requirements, higher than desired money
supply growth through economic recovery, and anticipated higher inflation.
Higher interest rates will impact local governments further than just reducing the
affordability level of municipal borrowing. It will impact housing starts and commercial -
industrial development and any other related private development. The potential impact
on development should raise some warning signals for public - private ventures. Those
communities asked to issue improvement bonds for new housing projects may want to
consider scaling down expansion plans, or requiring increased security from developers to
guard against assessment delinquencies or development agreement default. Communities
considering tax increment projects may want to reexamine the impact of higher private
interest rates on construction schedules, and the impact on debt service revenues if
development or redevelopment is delayed or reduced in scope. Housing bond issuers
should examine closely the market demand for reduced rate mortgages at the higher
levels. We hope you will feel free to call us with questions on development security,
market timing, or other matters of concern to you.
Municipal Investments
Most of you have heard the horror stories recently about the loss of value of municipal
investment portfolios through imprudent investment practices and/or bankruptcy
proceedings. This space does not permit a summary of what your investment policies
should be. However, we have been impressed with the quality of a fairly new publication
devoted to investment strategy and wish to bring it to your attention. It is PUBLIC
INVESTOR, a monthly subscription newsletter of the Government Finance ff icers
Association (formerly MFOA). Annual subscription cost is $50 for active GFOA members.
We assume those of you currently not receiving the newsletter could request a past copy
for review by contacting GFOA, 180 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 800, Chicago, Illinois
60601, or cal I ing (312) 977-9700.
New Federal Tax Bill
The new tax bill, if enacted into law, will have some positive and negative impact on
nearly everyone. In the municipal bond area the authority to issue tax-exempt bonds for
multi -family rental projects was retained. Similar bonds for single-family owner occupied
mortgages were reauthorized for a four-year period, subject to current restrictions, but
outside the $150 per capita limit. Most private purpose industrial development bonds will
be subject to the $150 per capita limit, but issues which have received preliminary
approval may be exempt from the per capita limit if issued during 1984. The conferees
agreed to prohibit any single user of IDB's to $40 million of bonds outstanding at any one
time, but permitted an extended use of small issue IDB's through 1988, if the bond
proceeds finance manufacturing facilities.
SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS
800 Osborn Building Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 . (612) 222-4241
The final bill has been approved by both houses of Congress and may be signed by the
President by the time you receive this letter. We suggest you review the bill's provisions
closely with a Bond Attorney with whom you have worked if you have questions about your
community's requirements.
The authorization to issue during 1984 any industrial development bonds which have
received preliminary approval will have at least a short-term adverse market impact on
all long-term financing. No one has a number for that potential volume but it will be in
the billions of dollars. It will exacerbate an already volatile market.
Tax Increment Financing
The limit on TDB's will make private development financing more expensive, and will
create some priority allocation requirements for city councils. It also is likely to
accelerate the requests for tax increment assistance since it may be the only game in
town. That will create another set of priority concerns, as well as impose additional
burdens on city staff. We believe cities will want to begin a more critical review of
whether incremental subsidy is needed to make a development possible. That will require
o detoited onotysis of required rates of return on investments, mimket income tevets for
the project and the private financing impact without tax increment.
We believe the use by cities of equity participation agreements with developers receiving
tax increment assistance will also accelerate. These agreements, if properly drafted with
meaningful requirements, can return to a city some or all of its net contribution to a
project should it be sold and/or become profitable sooner than anticipated.
Springsted Incorporated has developed some significant experience with both reviewing
the need for tax increment assistance and the use of equity participation agreements. If
you have any questions about either process we hope you will contact us.
Minnesota State -Aid Road Bonds
The Minnesota Department of Transportation is making good use of its new increased
revenue base, resulting in contract awards for many long deferred construction projects.
That's good news for drivers and highway construction firms. It may be bad news for city
engineers if the abundance of available work raises construction costs of local State -aid
projects.
Many cities do not know they can issue general obligation bonds for municipal State -aid
street improvements. You in essence borrow against future annual construction allot-
ments. There is a practical limit on how much you can borrow, since the average annual
debt service on all bonds cannot exceed 50% of your last annual construction allotment.
Interest on any bonds must be paid from the maintenance account, and there is a provision
in the law permitting a city to increase the maintenance allotment to 25% of the total
allotment.
Bonding may make sense if you have one or several projects which cannot be done with
current available funds, or if you feel the cost of deferring some needed projects may be
more expensive than the interest cost of borrowing money. Springsted Incorporated
maintains records on all municipal aid allocations and if you call we are able to compute
your current debt capacity. That information might be helpful in your planning process.
A
Present: George Muenchow
Mary Sullivan
Virgil Mears
Pat Ploumen
John Neely
Deloris Gorman
Roman Schneider
Ruth Schneider
Jackie Kes
SHAKOPEE COALITION
June 21, 1984
Jan Flesland
Brian Norris
John Anderson
Bill Streff
Jeff Manthe
Kathy Lewis
Tom Reiner
Nancy Delin
Meeting was called to order at 7:00 a.m. by Chairperson Neely.
Chair Neely reported that following the June 7 report by Rosemary Dineen, Housing
Alliance, Ms Dineen indicated that the Coalition could definitely be of assistance.
Should the non -subsidized housing be developed, the Coalition role could be that of
encouraging eligible persons to look at and consider moving into that housing.
John Anderson indicated that the City is supportive of the Alliance, encouraging
site location in the downtown re -development area. City information indicates a
need for about 100 units such as these. The non -subsidized housing is viewed as an
impetus to downtown development as well as a_viable means to "re -cycle" housing in Shakopee.
Nancy Delin, Early Childhood & Family Education Coordinator, Carver -Scott Educational
Co-op, presented a brief history of her involvement in family education services and
the development of the Co-op. She also spoke of legislative changes making funds avail-
able statewide for programs with strong parenting components. This year, 1984, is pri-
marily a planning year for programs. Early Childhood & Family Education programs are
preventative measures with long term positive community effect. Nancy indicated that
the Coalition's roles could be three -fold: 1) Program support and explanation of
community needs, 2) explore space needs, and 3) getting information into the community.
Mary Sullivan, Director, Scott -Carver Economic Council (SCEC), presented information
about the many services provided by that agency. SCEC is a private, non-profit,
organization serving economically and socially disadvantaged persons in Soctt and
Carver Counties. Some of the programs offered through SCEC are: Head Start, Fuel
Assistance, Congregate Dining, Commodity Distribution, Food Shelf, Thrift Shop, WIC
(Women, Infants, & Children), and others. Current SCEC Projects are 1) Fund Raising
Campaign for domestic violence crisis line, food shelf, and fuel assistance, and
2) housing search for administrative offices and the food shelf.
Jackie Kes informed the group that the Food Shelf needs strong persons to unload food
one or two times a week, 3:00-5:00 p.m., given a 24 hour notice. Coalition members
had a number of suggestions in this regard.
The Coalition is still solvent, according to George Muenchow, with a check expected
from the Lions Club.
Meeting adjourned at 8:00 a.m.
Next meeting is Thursday, July 5, 1984, 7:00 a.m., Citizens State Bank, with coffee
juice, and rolls at 6:30 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Pat Ploumen
MINUTES OF THE
SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES C014MISSION
(Regular Meeting)
The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in regular session on June 7,
1984 at 4:30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room.
Commissioner Kirchmeier offered a prayer for divine guidance in the deliberations
of the Commission.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Kirchmeier, Gorman and Cook. Also Manager Van Hout,
Superintendent Leaveck, Liaison Wampach and Secretary Menden.
Motion by Gorman, seconded by Cook that the minutes of the May 7, 1984 regular
meeting be approved as kept. Motion carried.
BILLS READ:
City of Shakopee
20,032.00
A T and T Information Systems
82.99
American Safety Utility Corp.
166.38
American Water Works Association
5.00
Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
8.54
Auto central Supply
29.91
Battery Tire Warehouse, Inc.
142.02
Berens Super Market
118.24
Burmeister Electric Supply Co.
1,171.91
C & H Carpenter Lumber Co.
139.00
City of Shakopee
1,549.09
Clay's Printing
114.00
Dunnings Hardware
11.98
Electrical World
12.00
Electronic Center, Inc.
85.66
Feed Rite Controls, Inc.
943.36
Graybar Electric Co., Inc.
851.83
H & C Electric Supply
1,166.20
Harmons Hardware Hank
21.98
International Business Machines, Inc.
109.13
F.F.Jedlicki, Inc.
828.50
Lathrop Paint Supply Co.
14.30
Leef Bros., Inc.
16.00
Malkerson Motors, Inc.
1,292.32
Treasurer, State of Minnesota
45.00
Minnesota Safety Council, Inc.
60.00
Motor Parts Service of Shakopee
181.06
National Fire Protection Association
48.02
Ted Neisen
322.00
North Star Waterworks Products
489.14
Northern States Power Co.
307.28
Northern States Power Co.
1,073.36
Northern States Power Co.
184,834.81
Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
295.41
Pitney Bowes
219.00
Reynolds Welding Supply Co.
3.18
Schoell and Madson, Inc.
210.80
Schilz Ornamental Iron
105.00
Serco
64.00
Shakopee Ford
8,000.71
Shakopee OK Hardware
59.68
Shakopee Public Utilities
405.45
Shakoee Services
18.00
Starks Cleaning Services
25.95
Suel Business Equipment
42.26
Lou Van Hout
72.65
Viking Business Interiors, Inc.
771.80
Water Products Co.
1,348.90
Westinghouse Electric Supply Co.
2,491.29
Motion by Cook, seconded by Gorman
that the bills be allowed
Motion carried.
and ordered paid.
Mr. John Anderson, City Administrator was present to discuss the water service to
Tahpah Park.
Motion by Cook, seconded by Gorman to defer the assessment of the trunk water
policy to the property owner on the 20 acres composing Tahpah Park until the time that
the water main is extended down County Road 15 past the property, at that time we will
address the assessment charges.
Staff was directed to draw up a Resolution regarding the motion of the deferred
assessment along with the timing of the connection charge and that the meter is to
be placed ahead of the plastic_ pipe and that the temporary situation of the plastic
pipe will be rebuilt at the time the main is extended.
The lighting for'Tahpah Park was also discussed. The standard charges for the
electric service will be known once more details are determined.
Liaison Wampach reported on a discussion regarding the availability of the
electric service for the Weinandt Acres. Street lighting for that addition was also
discussed.
Liaison Wampach also reported on the progress of the downtown ad hoc Committee.
They are looking into various areas of funding at this time.
Manager Van Hout gave the Commission notice of City code revisions. Their books
.F'i. i _V -L-
, 3}*L�t .i-..4.~' .YT.? t.:'
A feasibility study regarding the roadway at the location of Valley Park Drive
and 12th Avenue and 12th Avenue to County Road 83 was discussed.
Motion by Gorman, seconded by Cook that the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
concurs with the concept of leaving the watermain installation for the future, as
expressed in the feasibility study for the roadway at the location of Valley Park
Drive and 12th Avenue and 12th Avenue to County Road 83. Motion carried.
Manager Van Hout presented information on a possib re water maih ihstaflatibn
along Webster Street from 5th to 6th Avenue. This could be done in conjunction
with the installation of the sewer for the new Correctional Institution facility.
This new installation would benefit the City with improved water flow. The decision
whether to construct this watermain will be made when bid costs are in.
Proposals from the Downtown Committee regarding the burying of the overhead lines
i:: the dvw t' WW'n area were disvassed. Staff was directed to ret gza-yosals €rm
consultants on the engineering that will be needed.
The credit to the Hockey Association for the Ice Arena electric bill will be
applied beginning on their June bill.
0
Manager Van Hout gave a report on the status of the electric and water services
to the Racetrack. Final drawings are due on June 18, 1984. The Shakopee Public
Utilities Commission will be doing the inspections on the installation of the watermain
either by their own crews or by temporary assistance from Schoell and Madsen.
Manager Van Hout reported to the Commission on the efforts of John Dellwo to
save a heart attack victim. The Commission passed along their commendations.
The liquor license renewals for businesses with past due electric bills was
discussed. All bills must be kept current for liquor licenses to remain intack.
Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Cook to authorize staff to sign the agreement
for the watermain installation to the Minnesota Correctional Institution for Women.
Motion carried.
The cable communications of Prior Lake agreement was presented by Manager Van Hout.
Motion by Cook, seconded by Gorman to approve the Prior Lake agreement for rental of
electric poles. Motion carried.
The joint powers agreement with River Electric Association to intervene on
electric rates was discussed. Copies of the agreement will be available for the
next meeting.
The timetable for the remodeling was discussed.
Manager Van Hout reported that the St. Francis Regional Medical Center has
now installed the backflow valve and it has been tested.
Superintendent Leaveck gave a short update on the status of Well #3.
Manager Van Hout gave the Commission samples for a new logo for the Shakopee
Public Utilities. Commissioner Gorman offered to come up with some ideas for the
next meeting.
The Commission authorized staff to begin charging a $10.00 fee for all returned
checks due to non -sufficient funds or accounts closed.
There were no new plats for the month of May, 1984.
Superintendent Leaveck reported 2 fire calls for a total of 1 hour and 50 minutes.
There were no lost time accidents for May, 1984.
The next regular meeting of the Shakopee Public Utilities will be held on
Thursday, July 5, at 4:00 P.M.
Motion by Gorman, seconded by Cook that the meeting be adjourned. Motion
carried.
NA,
Barbara Menden, Commission Secretary
I
PRODEEDING OF THE
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNIESOTA JUi'i[: 7, 1984
Chairman Perusich called the meeting to order at 7:33 P.M. with
Comm. Caller, Czaja, Schmitt, Stoltzman and Rockne present.
Comm. Koehnen was absent. Also present were Judi Simac, City
Planner, Cncl. Vierling.
On a motion by Schmitt, seconded by Caller, the Public Hearing
for the Variance Request of 'Nordquist Sign Co., Minneapolis,
was opened at 7:35 p.m.
The City Planner presented the Request and Considerations for
the Applicant Nordquist Sion Co. (for Conklin Co.). She recommended
the variance be approved, stating the reasons for same. The Applicant
and Conklin Co. representatives replied to questions regarding the
said specifications of the proposed sign on the buildinq exterior,
which emphasizes the proportionality of the sign to the building
structure. after further clarification of the sign ordinance
and its application to the Conklin Co. building, the Applicant
acreed to redesign the sign in order to come into compliance with
the 70 sq. ft. =ign ordinance requirement for this building.
There followed discussion of the directional sin_n and the variances
requested to allow placement of the directional sions to eliminate
potential traffic hazards.
The Chairman called to further comnentc, and hearin,c none, Comm.
Caller moved, seconded by Comm. Czaja, to close t1e Fublic tearing
on 'lariance ^--solution ";o. 36-4, f'ordcuist ]inn Co., inneapolis,
;< (for Conklin Co.). Motion carried unanimously.
Comm. .chmitt moved, seconded by Comm. C311_er, to approve the
variance for directional siqns as incorporated by reference
Considervticn 'o. 4, an overall 201 sq. ft. total, statinc the
coal is to maintain traffic movement and acknouled-ina the owner's
property consists of three :separate parcels. ",,otion carried.
Comm. Rockne abstained due to his not bein.- present for the entire
public hearino.
On a motion by Comm. Schmitt, seconded by Comm. Caller, the .oard
of Adjustments and .Appeals was adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
Judi Simac
City Planner
rlenda D. Spiotta
Rlecordin7 Secretary
PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLA"!NING COMMISSION
SPECIAL SESSION SHAKOPEE, MI[INESOT ; JUNE 79 1984
Chairman Perusich called the meeting to order at 0:00 p.m. with the
following members present; Comm. Czaja, Coller, Schmitt, Stoltzman,
Rockne, Comm. Koehnen was absent. Also present were Judi Simac,
City Planner, Cncl, Vierlino_. ICC Chairman Paul Wermerskirchen,
and ICC members Jane Du9ois and Gary Eastlund also attended.
RESULTS OF Rf CCTRACK AREA STUDY PL1W'N- J I 'iG 'ZONI IP'G QUEST IONiNA IRE
The City Planner notified the Planning Commission of the availability
of the results of the questionnaires. The results were distributed
by John Shardlow, planning consultant with Howard Dahlgren .Associates.
He stated twenty–seven questionnaires were returned and completed;
only one Planninn Commission member responded, therefore, he requested
verbal responses from the members during the questionnaire review.
There followed a point by point analysis of each question and responses,
with the members providing their input. There was a general discussion
of screeninn, buffering and lgndscapinn with design criteria. The
baiT'ian TB1qUSS'UST1 a `%,La iiciui="c'ua ��i�riiS^�,�t^8 ^.riL�i^,?^Cp h -e rra�sided
for rev_ew cnd research implementation in other communities. There
was concensus to encournoe landscaping throu7!-� the review and
approval process, and there was discussion of the use of variance
to permit screening, buffering, etc., if regsoncole.
.
'u � tt
.. c, i ',•6 r:; .f ireg 3t - -y,�n -.
in the 'Zacetrac!: ,rea. It was a concensus that the current Sinn
�,, Z' (%I: f P'�. ( �(,; (, ,r ,- ._ 1 r�' :L i cr �'r u c C{tr i' v �_ cr '� . i i _" r . • .: �' .c .^r ' v .., . -
In the review of question ^:o. 9, the concept of n development district
uas described by P,r. Shardlou. It was noted that Shakopee has supported
t.ax increment district in the past and there wcs support for identifying
crews or zones for development.
Comm. Schmitt offered an additional comment reaardin^ potential
designation of parkways within the Pacetr^ck ',re:l and initiated
disctsssinc� of same, L^.r, ;3hardlou listed three factors to consider:
1–uho pays for parkways, 2–how to require dedication of parkways, and
3–how to maintain parkways. !ae stated public p^rtTi(c.,iip, action in the
-YJ - _�_i_—i�eav ov`.�. --�- s'e�-`-•
j �"vl�"`"" �� � 1 1l127SJCi Zill�
� r- of "cooperation" vs. requireme , an urtner —L� w
Schmitt regarding the requirement of landscaping standards. Comm.
good to emphasized the value of creatine an environment that looks
those who come to Shakopee and to encourage return trips.
Indus -trial ;.;r. Gary Eastlund stated that due to covenants within the
ich would park, he would be totally against landscapinc standards wh
require Planning Commission review and approval.
Shakopee Planning Commission
June 79 1984
Page 2
lb
Draft Goals and Objectives was presented by John Shardlow and read
into the record. The Chairman commented that the comprehensive
planning perspective includes citywide effects, applied consistently
or justified by unique situations.
There continued an extensive discussion and review of the existing
2,2t -.d
r n n ri h r��$ r4,�r iE ,as p� f•" r S h Li l pIJ
`
stated t`nat Vne ideas land usa axises rlou around V s
i.e. industrial. The B-1 Commercial area is logically located
to the 169 ^y -pass area and provides direct access with full
intardhanee movements. t o-r-a-coram-e-ni-Tr-= u -I I&
use of 71.1 density close to the racetrack, and recommended the
1-1
-4 te cha,lged to 1-1 or/and portion= of it to commercial. He
}.ssti'iad �,is secs c�,en.da+Lanz re.avrdin.c mitad residential near
the racetrack as it is a major metropolitan entertainment facility, and
requirement:, of Li Coast z CO .Lector--LL-vff2 :i �tce� t cu -2u rTe?eu t
for the "00 acre current R-4 zone. ;e also noted the open space needs
of residenti-.l ,ones.
The Planning Commission considered the R-4 :_one and the issues of
removinn the C-4 --one or keepinc a portion of the current 80 acre
-4 zone and tra:ncferinq density, the impact of the mill Creek
drainace basin buildine limitations in place now ^nd future
availability of the F '_1 Creel: basin for res dential. In conclusion,
Cohn 3hardlow stated he will return with a specific 2-4 zone relocation
within the City for the Planning Commission to consider.
Discussion turned to the --1 area near the 3y -pass along Co. Rd 17
and the existing agricultural preserve desicnation of an area north
of the 3y -pass alone the fiill Creek drainace basin. Comm. Collar
suooested lookino at population projections and future needs in
order to decide on the alternates of the ;-4 area.
There wss a :grief discussion of the 3-2 area :!round the intersection
of Co. ';d. 17 16, and a suggestion was made to reduce the density
to 5-1.
In a review of the permitted and conditioncl uses, it was suogested
to review the screening requirement; for outdoor storac_e areas, and
fr. Shardlow agreed to do so.
The Planning Commissions staff, consultant and the audience
also considered deo what extent ohould Commercial use be allowed
within Industrial areas. This will be pursued at length at the
next Planning Commission meeting based on the consultant's research.
Preliminarily, the consultant recommended commercial -recreational
uses be conditional uses in both Industrial zones.
There continued n point by point review of each category of permitted
and conditional use by affectod zoning districts. Comm. Schmitt
Shakopee Planning Commission
June 7, 1964
Page 4
PL NNING COMMISSION MEMBER CORPE+'SATIO�� ",i,'D ',ESENTEEISM
The Planning Commission reviewed the information provided
regardinq compensation and absenteeism. Comm. 1chmitt stated
the information was incorrect as the County Planning Commission
stated that the City
,"Atorney has advised that compensation is not allowed.
.:',iter the members discussed the commitment expected of each
member to attend meetings regularly, the Chairman encouraged
each member to notify the City staff if personal plans make
it impossible to attend a scheduled meeting, in order to allow
an opportunity to poll for a quorum. 111so discussed was tardiness
of members. Statino that specific membership criteria are important
to know, Comm. Czaja moved, to recommend to the City Council to
establish an attendance policy for the Planning Commission that
three—fourths of all meetinos must be attended. The motion failed
for lack of a second.
VOLU:'TEER FOR fIOUSIP:r `,LLI,`,NCE'5 CITI-'E?: T" -'5K FORCE
On a motion by Comm. Rockne, seconded by Comm. Schmitt, the staff
was directed to offer regrets for the unavailability of a Planning
Commission member to volunteer for the Housing, .',lliance's Citizen
Task Force, snd to extend an invitation to appear bt the Planning
Commission neetinns with information in the future. Rlotion carried.
PPE'V',ILIi!G VER E
is
The City Planner presented a memo related to the discussion of
the i=lanninq Commission zt an earlier date recardinq required
vards and openspaces.
REVIEU OF CO".'DITIC"!AL USE PERMIT °!C. 296
Comm. Schmitt,moved, seconded by Comm. Czaja,to accent the
staff review of Conditional Use Permit "o. 296 of Roger l..lhipps
ijobile Home. Motion carried.
THER SUE INESS
The City Planner notified the Planning Commission of conditions
not being met for the Gordon Hall Conditional Use Permit to
op'orate a mobile home business. After discussion, staff was
directed to inspect the mobile home business for conformity
after 90 days, and if not in conformance, should prepare a
written notice of nonconformance with the conditions.
tjakopee Planning Commission
June 7, 1954
Paae 5
On another topic, the staff Was requested to research building
permits received by the Uhle Trucking building on Co Rd 16.
Comm. Schmitt moved, seconded by Comm. Collar, to direct st-Tf
to research the Uhlen Trucking juilding on Co Rd 16 for current
use and compliance With screening provisions. Potion carred.
There followed brief discussion of the original use of this
parcel.
There was other discussion of the general impact upon construction
as a result of the moratorium, and enforcement responsibilities
tot aandittanaL use permits. Comm. Czaja notified the members
bf a situation on Co fid 35 and 83 (Otting house and parage),
and the City Planner advised the Planninn Commission that the
owner has been cited and the City "Attorney has been contacted.
,"DJ0URNFiE''T
On a motion by Comm. Schmitt,
on Was auju-1— �. I'. --
I
- - '
Judi Simac
City n lanner
Glenda D. ,piotta
Recording )ecretary
seconded b- Comm. Collar, the
�4 -.1- 11.1; n_m_
Shakopee
planning Commissi
R,
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
„ zarb+Tn T cu unp Inum- OT& MAY 1, 1984
Yt�liUl�iirt aGaalv'ly N�,Al.�� -�-�, �
CJiir_m. Dunwell caned the of ee tf,i, +� members Meeks,
Spiotta and Ziegler present. Member Schwingler arrived later. Also present
were Judi Simac, City Planner and Barry Stock, Administrative Aide/Transit
Coordinator.
Ziegler/Spiotta moved to approve the minutes of April 19, 1984 as kept.
Motion carried unanimously.
Barry Stock was introduced, and he proceeded to go over the proposed contract
with MnDOT for the term of July 1, 1984 through December 31, 1984.
Member Schwingler arrlvda aria `codx'ner ���� �a 'r :�,'p.'�•
The City Planner said she was informed that after the City approves the con-
tract, it will take about a month for all the necessary signatures to be ob-
tained, and therefore a July 1, 1984 start up was designated. Sipe added. th's
City Attorney has reviewed the contract and approved it as to form.
Discussion ensued regarding the funding cycle for the transit services. The
City Planner said there wouldn't be a separate fund for transit, but just a
program number for transit within the general fund. The Transit Committee will
have to make requests for funds from MnDOT for various expenses. Mr. Stock
pointed out that the funding for this first six month period is not one-third
of the total for the 18 month program. They have requested additional funds
for this first period for all the start up costs. He also noted that any excess
would carry over to 1985. He continued to go over the budget, and then the
management plan.
The City Planner said the requirement of 90f of the projected ridership for
Dial -A -Ride for 1985 is flexible, and she didn't think there would be any prob-
lem if it was 70/ or so. If it fell below 60o, she would think it would nave
to be re-evaluated. She said that Ray Olson is very enthusiastic about the
prospects for success for the Dial -A -Ride program.
Mr. Stock went over the Addendum, which is the narrative for budget line items,
which he said is not a part of the contra ct. He then pointed out the form for
Requests for Funds from MnDOT.
Member Schwingler asked about the possibility of transfers from this system
to the U, Lake Street or St. Paul. She estimated there could be 12-15 people
from the current bus ridership who would transfer. She thought if there wasn't
a transfer system, we will lose people. The City Planner said she would check
it out as to how it could be worked. Mr. Stock commented that there is a pos-
sibility of having a van go directly to certain areas, such as the U, to avoid
transfers. He added there may have to be some transfers available. He said
that part of the Opt Out strategy would be to get names of people who ride the
bus, their destinations and times necessary.
Schwingler/Ziegler moved to recommend to City Council that the MnDOT contract
for Opt Out with the City of Shakopee be approved as written. Motion carried
unanimously.
Energy &. 'Transportation Com.
May 31, 1984
Page 2
Mr. Stock initiated discussion of a marketing strategy for the Opt Out program.
He read the advertisement to be put in the paper asking for creative ideas for
a name and logo for the transit system. It was suggested the estimated value
of the tokens for transit rides be included. Mr. Stock said publicity is very
important at this point, and a name and logo are needed before any other mar-
keting strategies can be started. The City Planner said they want to contact
local groups, especially to inform them of the Dial -A -Ride.
The City Planner was requested to check out billboard space to be provided by
Naegele.
The City Planner highlighted information on Metropolitan Transit Tax Feathering
legislation, and asked the members to keep this in mind. She said at some time
in the future we might want to reduce the system to reflect a decrease in the
mill rate.
The City Planner informed the members about the progress of Chaska and Chanhas-
sen in their Opt Out efforts. She said they are going to be requesting a
feasibility study for a joint system. How Shakopee could fit in would be listed
as an alternative in the study. The consensus was to keep informed in the
other cities' progress, but to continue Shakopee's schedule on its own.
The City Planner said that recent legislation has made available $145,000 in
grant money for Minnesota. Of that cities can get up to $15,000 with a 1076
local match, which can be tied into transit service. The money is to used to
plan and conduct energy awareness type programs. She said the requirements are
vaugue now but she would try to get more information on it. She urged the
members to be innovative in thinking up ideas that can be pursued.
The City Planner is also waiting to hear more about money that will be avail-
able from a Federal case from Amoco Oil overcharge, which will be available to
be spent on transit programs.
Mr. Stock read the introduction to a name and address sheet he would like circu-
lated among the current bus riders informing them of the discontinuation of
the MTC service and its replacement. Chrm. Dunwell and. member Schwingler said
they would be responsible for circulating the lifts among the riders of the two
buses.
Ziegler/Weeks moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned
at 9;00 p.m.
Judith Simac
City Planner
Diane S. Beuch
Recording Secretary
1.3
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JUNE 21, 1984
Chrm Dunwell called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. with members Schwingler,
Ziegler and Spiotta present. Member Weeks was absent. Also present were Judi
Simac, City Planner and Barry Stock, Transit Coordinator. John K. Anderson,
City Admr., arrived later.
Mr. Stock went over the changes in the Dial -A -Ride specifications. He said
MnDOT provided these bid specifications, and he has made some revisions and
additions, which will have to be approved by MnDOT. He said the date the bids
will be opened is July 30, 1984.
The City Admr. arrived and took his seat at 7:40 p.m.
Mr. Stock suggested a reduced fare for children and seniors. He will ask Ray
Olson, of MnDOT, if he has an idea how much the City would lose by doing that.
He would hope to make up in volume what is lost in fares. Member Ziegler thought
children and seniors would be the biggest groups of people using the Dial -A -Ride
(DAR. Mr. Stock said the City can change the fares later.
Discussion followed regarding Mr. Stock's recommendation to include a requirement
of having the garage and dispatch facility in the City. The pros would be faster
response, less mileage, easier accessibility and more visibility and identifica-
tion with the City. The biggest disadvantage could be requiring a contractor
to build or lease a facility in the City if they already have a facility elsewhere,
which 1i3,ald affect the cost of operation. An alternative •Rould be to just require
the dispatch office in the City, which would insure a Shakopee phone number.
'Tne Vi'ty Aamr. suggested -Leaving `tne specs as 'tney are for one al'terna'tive, and
adding the Shakopee location as another alternative and receiving the bids to see
what difference in price the location would be. There was general agreement on
this suggestion.
The City Admr. also suggested adding the word "local" in section 9d to maintain
a separate "local telephone number for the program". There was consensus.for this
change.
Mr. Stock invited suggestions for what kind of specifications should be required
f -ttaz{¢hz�C��� � �.f3 �5?4; �3 � ��Sia Z�h,,-J&t +1 iffayAr�l SS�h3�3 3�5. �'4;%
sensus was to require something like that which was shown by Plymouth; more of
a customized van -type vehicle, with a sliding door and room for riders to stand
upright inside. Mr. Stock will pick up some specs for vehicles of this nature.
He will also contact Mr. Ray Olson about requirements. Member Ziegler mentioned
air conditioning. Yiemoer ocnwingier asxea for inciusior. of a 'nanaicapp iiia For
the one vehicle.
Mr. Stock pointed out all the additional specifications for drivers that he added,
and the Committee had no problems with them.
Mr. Stock said he met with the Finance Director and called Capesius Insurance
Agency to find out exactly what was needed for insurance. He said this increased
requirement of insurance with the umbrella would increase costs about $500.00,
and give the City good coverage.
Shakopee Energy &; Transportation
.June 21, 1984
Page 2
The City Admr. suggested discussing a requirement for bonding the drivers.. He
said that is required in the City's new taxicab ordinance. He pointed out that
is an additional way to insure against getting a driver with a bad record. Mr.
Stock will check out that possibility.
Member Spiotta asked if the specs were to be reviewed by the City Attorney. The
City Admr. said he doesn't usually review specs, but he could be asked if he
thinks it is necessary to do so. Member Spiotta mentioned she is especially
concerned about insurance limits, and the City's liability. The City Admr. said
the State law is clear in setting liability limits for municipalities, but there
has been some differences in interpretation. Member Ziegler said if we have
excess insurance, we can be sued for that much more.
Mr. Stock asked for a recommendation to City Council on these specs. The City
Admr. said the major change that members have not seen would be the specs on
the vehicles. He suggested Mr. Stock could send each member a sheet detailing
that change before the Council meeting, and if anyone has any problem they should
let him know right away.
Ziegler/Schwingler moved to accept the Dial -A -Ride Specifications with the changes
discussed tonight, and recommend approval of the same to City Council. Motion
carried unanimously..
Yj� . Sto&k addressed A.'ne1e L ger he S�T'i u to KT. 'ic'viiS v1Z-On' Y;T13 v ,Laf ?, vx . , 'aSk-
ing about transfers from Shakopee Van Pools to the MTC routes. He said we are
pa vi rig new ground mere, a rd with the revamping of the ITC and the creation of
the Regional Transit Board, he doesn't expect a speedy answer. He pointed out
other alternatives that could be worked with the budget. He will continue to
monitor this concern for response.
Mr. Stock said they received only 5 responses from the public to the name and
logo contest for the transit service, with other entries coming from himself
and other City employees. He posted the 22 suggested names without identify-
ing who submitted them.
The list was narrowed down to Shakopee Area Transit, Shakopee Transit System,
Shakopee Trotter Transit, Shako -Valley Express, Shakopee Valley Express and
Minnesota Valley Ride.
Mr. Stock then posted the logos received. Discussion followed without a consen-
sus. The City Admr. suggested asking the commercial artist from Valleyfair who
helped the Chamber with its tourism booklet to polish up a couple of the entries.
Consensus was to use the logo with the moving wheels submitted with the name
"The Shakopee Connection" and the logo with the horse head with an Indian head
outline within it. And to put with the logos the names Shakopee Area Transit
and Shakopee Transit Connection.
Ziegler%Schwingler moved to choose The Shakopee Connection as the first place
winner of the name and logo contest. Motion carried unanimously.
Schwingler/Ziegler moved to choose Echemahne as the second place -winner of the
name and logo contest. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Planner informed the Committee of the Downtown Redevelopment Public
Hearing set for June 26, 1984 at 7;00 p.m.
Mr. Stock went over the requirements of Naegele Sign Co. for free space on their
billboards. The City would have to pay $60 per sign for posting and pay for
Shakopee Energy & Transportation 3
'June 21, 1984
Page 3
production costs and the printing of the paper. The company also requires a
minimum of 5 signs ordered, and the City cannot use any other advertising mech-
anism. He asked for a clarification if the advertising restriction only refers
to other billboards. He will be sent a list of available locations, and the
City will be able to pick its preferred locations.
Discussion followed. Member Ziegler thought one sign at lst and Holmes might
be worth a lot more than several signs that are not in such good locations.
Ms. Stock said all 5 signs have to be the same. He suggested 3 signs in August
and 2 in September. The City Admr. said this also might be something that could
be discussed with Valleyfair's advertising staff.
Mr. Stock said Ray Olson thinks the City should do a Request for Proposals
rather than bids for the Van Pool. Mr. Olson doesn't think there are that many
good providers available, and he thinks RFP would be quicker. He will probably
have the specs for the Van Pool at the next meeting.
Mr. Stock went over the time frame he has developed for the diffferent actions
and a pro ais k� Lake pace- Fie aa -UL - i,hBMe is a po ssYbII)L ty 'chat a special
meeting would be required on August 2nd to approve the bids from DAR. August
1st was decided to be a better date for the special meeting, if needed, because
of quorum needs. August 21 is planned for City Council approval of the Van Pool
contract, which is less than a month from when the system should be operational.
Mr. Stock commented they will have to stay pretty strictly to that time frame.
Mr. Stock informed the Committe that the person submitting the first place name
and logo :w.s Ann Tuttle and the second place winner is Betty Schmitz.
Ziegler/Schwingler moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned
at 9s15 P.M.
Judi Simac
City Planner
Diane S. Beuch
f2Nf A
tH
�SnTATE Of
�JLl EEZ�cTQDEPARTMENT T
PHONE: _ 492-6400
Leroy Hauser
City of Shakopee
Public Works Department
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Mr. Hauser:
OF NATURAL RESOURCES
File No
July 12, 1984
This letter concerns our recent phone conversation =°- arding
the damaged building at Riverside Park. You are hereby authorized to
dispose of the building as you see fit because of safety and the potential
hazards it presents to the public. This is consistent with our lease
#144-15-85, 14b. maintenance of premises and facilities.
Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention and for your
excellent cooperation in remedying this potentially hazardess situation.
S �_ncerely,
Chuck Kartak
Minnesota Valley Trail Manager
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
,/�
V
W
�b
•D W MNNA MJ A O N •D �
A
t
VJ
IL
M
• •• • • • •
M
•
`O O A
•
N p O p pj
OJ e -CYN O ONe�MNNA
AAMNJM A00 OJPJ
10
•
P, •
r
• • • • •
•- '
W W
I I
I
•'M
1 1 1
10
0,
`•
N C3 OD P:
•' O DDNM;
d V
AO
A
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
NGOON00 0,0 a NO'-.�OOU
1 1 1
.-
LL Z
Mp
r)
w` ON G7N000�N W N� V Op
¢ C)
J
O
O OOOOOn OON00 u.00
N O'OOOpN V
hal
Ap
A
PP,p Ne- W OV UA �O e. AN�Np
�p
P •. h A M O O N N N M O N O
P
OO .-U A
'OO
O
N O N J P O M N
P•
coJN• GO OONJ
MM
N<<•
OO
JO0+•0,o
•
•
• O O O I V
: r r N O M N
a
�O U
10
P O r r O N M
y�
• • w •. • •
• • •
Wl OU
U
n
r-
1
d
W'
V J
OQ
Nu
O
LL
O
' O
`O
OONOM1 OO DO OD MN0000
O
uUOC) Oa OC•UOO OOO
J UOq OC)NO
O r-
• •
•
• • • • • • • • • • • • •000
O OQOOONOONO0000
h OOO 00l+ b
U
A
A
e• M N pp J N N M N M1 N P e-
M
• • • • • • • • •
• e • • • • • •
V)
~ d
P
P
CID co ' N 10 P A N M P M1
N N
N Vo
N
a
A
h
A P M a
N
s 10
O
¢M
•
w
• ♦ w • • • •
•
M h
M N O It, 1\.
M
J N
• •
• • ••
M
M
N
V`
d
O
O n,y
W
r
r
Y
W
Z
00 u
O
0 Cl 0 GJ O O U O QO O p U u U
0 u
O
O
n n
O O O O V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O
O O U V U v O p U O C' U L) O m
v u 0 0 0 U 0 U
W
•
•
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• •
O O O O v G p O o O : O O O
O O O q O O O O
n
0 0 0 0 0
• • • • • •
W
O
0
0 0 0 1^ V o W, 0 0 o n
O O O O N O O O J
P O O J 0 0 0
¢
Np
N
000 V �p ODMNM1 NNNN NOe-
00
C)n O10 P OOOa'
M O oaonoo
• •
•
• • • • • w . • . .
OO V ~ ' OnOM
O r 00N000
•
00
O
ON a e�10 Na•
w.Je-
N
• •
• • w
P J
M
M w,
o
�"O N N OM 00Q
a 00'a I^
V)
00
P
M .- a 'O J
J
W
1-
U
G
Dr
..1
v
v
z
LL
a
u
2
4
¢
zn,
W
Z
C)
Z J
4
C)
G
0 0 0 U 0 0 CO U P C
w) C'
O O Dr .0 P C• '> W C C
CO C_U 0 r r-, U C' U C.- r_i O C U
J O ..
0 0 0 C` C O m
►- r
•
•
• e • • • • • . • • •
• •
O C C. n r., O C% C'� c- C
.
C! o o b b
• • • • • • •
• •
2d
NM O Doom Nom•-
NO
W
M1 N .• p, N
N IQ
W
• •
¢
J N M a
¢
N
M
I
a.
U W
7
z
W
W
¢
r
N
W
N
U (n
W V) N
Y 1•
t
�'
►• W V) •w i Z
Z O H W LL
1- N W V)
�N
JV)U W N Z V)¢¢
N
r dH `mac CD0
NZ NW W
O
4� V,
W
a p a v
Z C7
2 0 W 1� V
W
L
¢ H
tJ V) J L V' N M W N LL d
H LL
Q H • H
W cc a •HL
•+ W H
W
-)Z
¢
W V) a C y)► -HZ 4
_
1
¢ W
i L. t7 r'
OF U. 07
a
LL 4
V H
v) W rr W 0 H H¢
Ir IH
b N H ¢)
V` _¢
V
)"'
ua
^hV)JUH Z Z W ¢ W
W u
N ^Uan J
1 V W O W W
Y
J �-
v
�V)
i Z W W w W v) r Q ¢ LL V) W LL O
ar W
1 •• V)
W V) crr w)
W r• ^® V) W
�+
1
d LL
Q )")
1 a
V W V) i J 2 W W W r r c a
J
V v V IJ Q c U
V) W r- t. • a a )- r u H H
W Y U.
y, Y W
N
W
In
Y
t- U L v N V) W 2 a<^ a J W i
•• W
N i Z v W 1� Z • • t t • 4
1p
=¢ Q W Z W
Z L
H
U
a r+ W C^ W V) Z �+ d i. d (y, Z
{L J •- U W {i.t 0 (y U LL U V V
V
Q V a LL >• Y Y H W V ►..
CO = H Q; Z H p
LL
W N
)
4�
LL m e•. m U Q Z :t — W b —,z
V)
W W
1 u w ►- W U J 7 V) r`
p W CJ C.2 DC Z m
C O Q ►' ¢ Q
W
O
CD W
�+J
¢J W "I--H«+c V ¢r
N ►+
WWH WOtD W 1=, Q Y
7 W)A
`O
a
�.uj-J0HHr u W WHa H
JUW 4'U
Q) 10-
¢W W¢Z�
Y
r
•U
4)
-+J¢ CD4 UJ...)bJi lrW tJWU
W
a a►-�- �+g U Z
QJ 0— 40
P-
•'
•
Q 2
c to
W ►+
x
•q
acs W c LD to CDOH7u J71 W¢ Vi
u a
0w a Jat,ra a J0 4
-I—
S1Ja OCD CD
V
OLL
►-
< .. W .. ►, •r O O O J W W W J r ►+
►. Z
W O tD O 4, ¢
I.j •[ < 0 2 Z
,O
0
uJ¢n-UZ Oq, OJLLZJ NW V)i
J ►'•
¢i 0M -i W0a Q4y {p
p�(J0 f+W
J
OU e -N
•
pe-Nr.a NOe`NnJ V, wp
♦ N •
l
N)O Iy Ow•)+jO p•NMa h OO •
DDP
'
P
z V •+N
00
i
t
r •.. �.. ems.. Y MM MMMMMM MM
♦ M A
OOONN N M M M M M
dIN'ON
e'
Q<
U.M M
•
••. •.tee- ���•.. r. p. •-e-�
r!
♦ N :
��� MMMM MMMM MMMM •
V1a/1�1RN NOO
M M r) r) M M M M M M M M M wr M
• r)
MMM M M M r) M M K, M M •
I
)•1 M M PI M M P
j
!
I
1i
!
• 0 0
• 0
0
y r
U h W U J N N N P
rL
P '
P00 s -Nr �
W M v�� P WN Nr
r HY Lr p in t0 V O V P A N P M
W •� *' N 1n ..
U W 1 O 1^ I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
LL c P O N J O V% O O M C, . p•- O O P t/� O O P. p b O G 0'.
N
C7OWrV C:) n pN u't 000fT00 F) r)000v.pN n w
4 • r • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
• r w r O U in Co p o W• U v WN V w W cc O •' O 17
¢ cc.f)V JMO+O MppA w P VN. -NJ O 00.0 O O J
M F. J O A p, �O i
aC W r 00 M 00 N P
1 N N N
O
M N
U J
4 %COV O V Ul!N OO F - OJ OU C)V, OU• - J CO00'!N cc n
LL O P O N D O O N O O N O A to 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O V^ O A N
U 0p N O O Z M .f J to a0 M N N a0 M A
O FR
cn 4 00 Lr% N %O M +O �o P h r P J x V+ P M P M oC
4 A 0 0 0 0• P• • C7 W p. ,p O �O O M 10 N
• • • • • • D P •
tY 's M fV M r r N JN M N D C) 00 P P M N
r N to h LIN F-
a N J
W
r
W
G U O C U U 0 0 0 0 U U O O C7 U C% O U c O U CU O O
Z 0000000 CJOC U%C J O V 00000 G✓pOOC)00
T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C O J 00
W 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 O rl O O n t% O n 0 0 (7 0 M N
¢ C a OinON P pv+OP CM ( a Lt 00 NOP O a a0
• J s-NNM N J r-_ N 6 V1 OC M 0.0 0 CC) 00
`C r 00 'O
V)
W M A h
cV
r
U
a
F
K
W
O U
Z
R. 4
Q
m Z a
r
W c
O
Z L J
a •- O O O N C O C C Z C, V` C' O C O O O C: 0 .0 O O C Ci c �c .�
W 0 a 00bJ nC, r^., n CP C..
a U r O Oo u\ O • �O OC V� • J N
L I• 00 r. M P 'Q r �o ,o •- M `4 J 1f1
4i J M A M 1
41 C
• � �
N r N N
V N W
¢
U W
D
1
W
T
W
r
W
W W
V) W
a to LL
• J V) U
O 4 V) v) v) > W 7
V)Z r J W W 2 J CD W V) �. V)
W OZ a CDU V) C) O V)¢ W ¢c ..)
U S U W •- (r L.i 2 Cl) W 4 .I LL L i a
W c U I a. Z a+ _j C L3_ V) K r. x LL I ✓••..
¢ d' W I LL O a f H i Jr. vw V)2 C+> V
4 Lt. V W o a> ¢u W p LL In ¢ Vt V O U LL CD z r V) �-
O l.J IJ T H ¢ V1 Q. C — V V) Z • LC Vt
LL V) v) 1¢ .r J V) t7 • W 1 •• b LL W LL V) J a W m V
C LL LL L W V a Y c v) 1, V)4L x I W ++. J i W r 1 v L c
= LL �"^ Y r •i O 11 LL+¢ x c 2 V) V) (XV vt J J U V LL • W W O
L C[ U Z a A 0 4: V C) > a C) W J �--� Z 0 V U 1.. V) 6 } Ly
c U W 4l W x iL 1 3 )" •¢ ^� W J r •- u (? O V 7 U)" c V) a W
LL W V) = i LL¢ 4 W O O V) LL C Z Z [1 W N W V) W W m
O CD W U V) p 1 r LL U V LL W y U W Z V) �-+ + C7 C W 2 V) J
O v) V) rL., �-^ •Z W O OOV)i •ra W—(X 4tn 4i ¢
> c W W r U W .J J O V •" U C W �-+ vt ►� = U c 2l 1-- a W Z 0 U W
►' •- r a V) .G V) ¢ U Q- W V) w Z J¢ U a c r+ lry 0 0: a. r r Q • V; LL
)"' OZ J V)a J►+r 2� W.r o+ O O>' U W O O a V) CK (n a. ;F
U 7 4 a V) 4= N N a 3 ALL U 4 LL 4 0 w Vl a V) $ t✓ ¢ (� V) ••. (�, V) Z y
O
-4 C)U •-NM.f'F 00 OrN r14NMN MtnO•�NMO •-O' 0000 I •
Z'U ��•-•-•-•"NNN NM)fl) M.f .fM.CJ�MA,0, ,
•
Fn N N VI " V1 pn V• W N V1 N In N � N N %0 F, P, F- @)
M
¢ LL M M M M r) M M M r) M M M M M M"
M M M Fl MMM F, M� Mi y
I
r r
r N to, a C M J P N
LL • • • • • • • • • s • ♦ • r V R, ry pa O r r �O M r V') VN
�OPnPM Nn �0 MP.O JM • • • • • • e • • • • s • • • ® O
J Jr)JJ Nn J v\NNr N)r�OC PMNM CDP .O M v • • •
41 V J .0 .0 J M J J a N Y M M N V O O
t8 W N ry O. O
r
LL A WP r1 O0pOO d Mr.O J'�OUTAGPOJ rp00 tnN�,O06 OG O O O O O
O O V 1 0 0 W 0` O' 0 `r 0 W r r n r) r r) P O O O, i •" O r O O O O
O M A W d r- 1 M M M 4,z U d0 z 4 -
CL v 1` CL P P O P O M /. r 6,'0 M b .p q0
OOJ Mv. �Zr
p�N : 0
S • • s w ► •
d �O •�rJf�Vl dl� •0 NA MJ V1N • • ► • • • ► ►
WN rn JN M M1 fV rM PL.) W) wA MOM.p �O Oinr P p O
® r r •' C 00 00
M 10 N ry
1 4
�D
O J
Q 01r11'.NAUNO U c.+ n P Y 10 JOU V1 U r[3J P NC;. M d In R M Y UC P UU V U O O O
LL J ryMr)1 p0POdC 0 w• NrM•O op00�00 � O�ON :CJ :00 �0 `4
u u ►- • • • • • • • • • • • s • • • • • • • • • • e • • • • • s • • • • s O O O
V d M V A-.10 tv_ _
J P N e0 C �0 `6 .� P O A • • V1 N
w•• w • w ,► • w e w N ry s 0'' .
G: U t_.: a �'^ R n n J d
¢ A OrMNr A M n .O P. N.On .p Nre, r ► ► • w • •
P r d J N M N N d QO r R' �- a J a CO
.¢ d ,0 00 v- - tr P M M
N
W
Y i
00 O <J O D U p L i U O O O C O U O U O U g U U 0 0 C] U O g U u p U U U C J O U G O O O O
O0009
UO Q O ODUOOOOGOOC C%OOC) U0000°�:7 O h ',-19 ra O O O O
►� U O Q. v\ t0 A .p a V+ 0 0 0 L O O O O L p Lm p U U 0 0 0 C) r O
¢ A VtC Nlw 010N N �OOO r+n70 .0 V' OJ oC P M O
LL �Pr� r.O w.p N. ' d0 :n : : xJ .M .p .•i M d 10
d
O • s • • •-
Ix 17
LL is N OC a I� M L, O a M J J M %0 J h VN 0.
LL C) r J N J J `LJ Q.' r M Z) N R I� A
Q ^ N r, M M,
T M
H
H
CL u
LL
0
0.
W
W V
Z
tZ 4
¢
4
W _ >
¢ f-
a z
Q to J n z .0 cO 1 1
P N C� C'.. r.� N CC p M C M M r:
• • • • • • • • • • • • • Z N. • • ♦ s Z 4 R A r UP LIN F' M 0 P N V\ M •- M N M N R •D oc.- IP.
Y V A P M N O r a O M P N v P n. p oC p0
W
N y 10 P 6-1 •- J a0 r N N
W
_
uz
V
H
r
4
¢
a
V
u
LL
LL
Q
V) •C
4! W •- V
U U Z U
z z c v u LD c
W to > > • ¢ 4 • oUi W U H Cl Z V) Vi V) V)
W C) .. .+ r N N d V' V7 y u r > N V) O O W W V) ¢' (/) 1'
4i O? H r h- i,q V -aL L"� ' W LL LL Q LL 41 LL •- •� r. 1- r = LL
LL LL V ¢ •Q..� •tY 1 1 4) I W 1 V)J v a4 > LL ...
O J J Q 4 W 41 LL V > F 4 H r L7 F- IL •- M Q, .-a 1 Q' a s [] W LL Z
Y J ►- J J LL V ¢ N+ L o0 a U V V U V) = M I U Vi 10 LL 4l L a Q
Q Q LL a` LL �' W V W J W LP W W LL
U J VJ ti 1
J J H C! W VI Q► a 7 L Q 'j r 7 J V) V) W V J V LL Q V r
LL LL 1 LL LL J V W Vl 4 J 1 Z W W ►� W G W ¢, V) •1 W Q.7 V) W •0 C.7 ¢ X LL ►+
1 1 1 1 a a
Z U V) wVJ t" `ter C' ~ LHO.Ji 4)C 4+ V) U=J! 4.)f},
Vl v) •p V) r ..) 7 C7 Q V)
V) Q Z o0 fJ U W G. Vl Q V) l a r- C L u_
0.� W v) W l W Z L .'� U R W LI LL Z a )~ O O U V) O LL W h O Z z H W F- J W J •-. J V) W W 41
OL'iO ¢ F-¢ O vZ w- Z •+V H V) Hu "" V)►+ 47I .r J►r4 r CL K)L J �-+ Q
Q W y 2 LL
`" C` O J ') ¢ O LL • J .� L! J J 4 LL J 41 1- ¢ re V) W W W J F- Iy H ¢ 4 V)
Q Y l V) LL LL O J •-• �.+ Q J n 4.. Q 4 r- W Q' Z= J r LL V) g U 0. •s W •-) W /- i a
¢ 4 ¢ LL LL 1- .1 _ •-• S Q' O S CD VI J> a M y •y c Z W IL V) LL LL y 0. r M ¢ 4 i
w O L 4>4 W W W W O L W =JO=OI- ZW a ,,Z W V WZ �i at WO :3 -j = 4, 1.. ♦� L fW W Ir
U = N U V) LL LL LL L Z .J LL V) V) 1 W W= ►+ V) "' W- H J LL rN Lj ►) rj LL p. TL V C7 u i. V) U C7 U •-' O LL ►-
O
O ♦-N pr N • p V� NON d rN L` Or.0 C)• -`O4 i w.+ • • l
rpi Oar•. •. r r• -r rrry MM)M1da V r• rNNNr'1 VYW�4)OP•-P P • •-r • f • 0
.- LL. J J J J J Y .t a J ♦ N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M MM M M M M M d J t V 1 N ♦ .O i M h • �
V V J V d V d Y J d J `• d J J J d d J �! J J d J • J a • a • d
N r
W Y
CD W 1
t L) 0,0
.t
O O
P
LL 7 W 'C
O
O O
A
4 . .
•
.
K 000
M
V1 0
N
M `a
A
J J
J
`t ••
a ec
ao
ao W
O O
ti
1
� •-
A
O r
•
M
1 <
V J
Q •' 1^
C
O U
LL r''O
P
O O
N
O
Q A
ae
J
Q •
r
N
Q
O
W
�
O
O O
O
I- C c
o
c o
0
�+ 0 0
0
oo or,
,o
O V\
N
L^ u'l
N
CL V•
N
J
00
O
•
.
fY N
N
a0 aC
O
a
Q C1
.p
Q
N
r
¢ U
v
CL
W
W u
Z
CG Q
7
4
L1 = �
cr H
J 2
a n
u C,
v
r
Z u .�
z a
o0
L-
U
Li
d r
N
r
(r
y
W
J
u Z
0
a
oe
a
0
crLL
LL
a
W
J
Q
V)
V)
w
o ¢
Us
a
W Z LL
r
LL LL O v
�
Y H
L`
w
u
u
qa
N L I fr •-• V
c
z
L.
C L)
0 2 W a W
U
(D
j
Q'
L)
LJ
i
ZU vac •
P
•
! '
P O, •
P
6. J J •
�t
•
ADJ.REG. SESSION
Mayor Reinke presiding
TENTATIVE AGENDA
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
11 Roll Call at 7:00 p.m.
21 Liaison Reports from Councilmembers
31 RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS
JULY 17, 1984
41 Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterick
are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be
enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion
of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which
event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and
considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.)
*51 Approval of the Minutes of July 3, 1984
61 Communications:
a]
NSP re: Late Payment Charge
b]
O'Connor & Hannan re: Tax Bill
Concerning
Industrial Development
Bonds
c]
Scott County re: Regarding and
Paving of
County Road 83
d]
Fred Coller re: Resignation from
Planning
Commission
e1
Scott County re: Participation
in Criminal
Justice Advisory
Committee Activities
f]
Carl Stay re: Petition for Stop
Light at
4th and Marschall Road
71 Public Hearings:
8:30 p.m. - North-South Collector Street in Section 5-115-22
Roadway Construction (Shenandoah Drive) bring feasibility
report
81 Boards and Commissions - Planning Commission:
a] Racetrack Area Study Plan
b] Comp Plan Amendments
91 Reports from Staff:
}a] 8p:15 p.m. - Ronald P. Fells - Applications for Taxicab License
8
U� 25 17• a. 1L1C:. - VLi Sate d11U Je[�. 61g 1.1CtFilse
c] 8:25 p.m. - Shakopee Jaycees - Temporary Beer License - memo on
table
d] Downtown Revitalization Report
*e1 Sale of Land in Block 29, City of Shakopee
f] Norton Drive Repairs
*g1 JEJ Drainage of Former Railroad Right-of-way
*h] Street Lighting on County Road 17
*i] Shakopee Racetrack Offsite Roadway Improvement
*j1 Authorize Advertisement of Van Pool Request for Proposals
QFLFTEkI Management at 200 Levee Drive
11 Approval of the Bills in the Amount of $402,177.14
ml Authorize Advertisement for Bids for 1500 GPM Pumping Engine
bring specs handed out 7/10
n] Shiely Pit Expansion - Report by City Attorney
o] Retaining Howard Dahlgren and Associates as Planning Consultants
*p] Authorize,to Install No Parking Signs
*q] Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Pact
r] C.I.P. - continue discussion - bring item 8 from 7/10 agenda
*s] Industrial Blvd. South Retaining Wall (Pouliot's Wall)
*t] Payment to Westwood Planning and Engineering for Mini Bypass
Geometrics
101 Resolutions and Ordinances:
as Res. No. 2284, Setting a Public Hearing for $600,000 Commercial
Development Revenue Note - Shakopee 84 Partnership
111 Other Business:
a] Inquiries for On Sale Liquor Licenses
b] Verbal report from the Mayor re: Racetrack meeting held to
review construction noise
c]
d]
121 Adjourn, to Tuesday, July 31, 1984 at 7:00 P.M.
John K. Anderson
City kdnji ,istrator
C
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JULY 3, 1984
Mayor Reinke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Cncl. Colligan,
Lebens, Vierling, Wampach and Leroux present. Also present were John K.
Anderson, City Admr.; Jeanne Andre, Comm. Develop. Dir., and Julius A. Coller,
II, City Attorney, arrived later.
1lesoux/'6ampach moved to recess to conduct an ERA meeting. Motion carried
unanimously.
Lebens/Vierling moved to re -convene at 8:10 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Liaison reports were given by Councilmemi rs.
Mayor Reinke said he has a problem with supporting Gayle Kincannon for the
Regional Transit Board. The Council had previously decided not to support
anyone who was a previous board member. The City Admr. clarified that his
statement of support was verbal only, given to the Chaska Mayor.
Lexoux/Wampach moved to direct staff to send a letter to the Met Council in-
forming them that Shakopee does not support any present or previous members of
the MTC for nomination to the Regional Transit Board. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Reinke asked if there was anyone present in the audience who wished to
address the Council on any item not on the agenda.
Mr. James Kincannon said he is an attorney representing James Keith relative
to the Muhlenhardt petition to have certain easements vacated. He asked what
action the City has taken in response to the Petition.
The City Admr. responded that the City has not taken any formal action with
regard to the Petition, but eventually a public hearing, with all property hold-
ers notified, would be held. He said the City has been served with a summons,
which is turned over to the Ass't City Attorney, Rod Krass.
Mr. Kincannon said they would be bringing a motion July 13 to dismiss or set a
bond. He asked if the Court ordered the easement vacated, would the City comply?
He was informed the City would have no choice but to obey the Judge's orders.
The City Admr. suggested Mr. Kincannon get in touch with Mr. Krass.
Colligan/Lebens moved to approve the minutes of June 12, 1984 as kept.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
Colligan/Vierling moved to approve the minutes of June 19, 1984.as kept. Motion
carried with Cncl. Leroux and Wampach abstaining because of their absence at that
meeting.
Vierling/Lebens moved to place on file the letter from A.I.D. Homes II, Inc.
dated June 26, 1984 regarding the open house. Motion carried unanimously.
Wampach/Colligan moved to place on file the letter from Bruce Malkerson dated
June 22, 1984 regarding the closing of the loan agreement between the Racetrack
and Twin City Federal. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Admr. asked about re -appointments to various committees of the LMC and
AMM. All those on committees agreed to remain on them, with the exception of
Cncl. Colligan.
Lemux/Wampach moved to open the public hearing regarding the vacation of Cretex
Ave. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Admr. added the words"installation and" before "maintenance..." in the
last sentence of the first paragraph of Resolution No. 2280.
The City Engineer explained that there was no need for a utility easement for
a fire hydrant at this location.
Mayor Reinke asked if there were any comments from the audience, and there was
no response.
Shakopee City Council
July 3, 1984
Page 2
Leroux/Lebens moved to close the public hearing.
Motion carried unanimously.
Wampach/Leroux offered Resolution No. 2280, A Resolution Vacating That Part of
Cretex Avenue in Cretex Industrial Park 1st Addition, Scott County, Minnesota,
and in Howe lst Addition, Scott County, Minnesota, and moved its adoption as
amended tonight.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
Barry Stock, Transit Coordinator, said 8 companies have contacted him relative
to receiving the bid specs for the Dial -A -Ride system. He explained it would
operate only within the city limits. The Van Pool system to downtown will be
a separate bid or request for proposal. Discussion followed.
Colligan/Wampach moved to approve the Dial -A -Ride specifications and authorize
the appropriate City officials to advertise for bids.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
Leroux/Wampach moved to approve the application and grant a taxicab license to
Shakopee Cab Company, Inc., 1921 West 115th Avenue, Shakopee, for two vehicles,
upon compliance with the City Code, and approve the rates for $.95 per stop and
$1.10 per mile.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
Colligan/Vierling moved to approve the application and grant an 1984-85 On sale
Sunday Intoxicating Liquor License to Pullman Club, Inc., 124 West 1st Avenue,
effective July 8, 1984.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
Mr. Graves, of Miller & Schroeder, gave an explanation of what happens to the
Kmart Tax Increment District if mill rates drop or interest rates increase,
and explained a sinking fund. He said they have talked with the rating agency
about using the excess monies in the sinking fund. He also suggested the con-
tingency fund (Wangerin lawsuit) could be lowered to $50,000 from $250,000, based
on current negotiations.
Discussion followed regarding Kmart's current agreement on assessed valuation.
napd_ snmP f, +hQ i nfzrma.+jun. nn. +he aPT_PPm.enf.
Mr. Graves said that using GO Bonds, there is no need for the sinking fund, and
therefore, the City would have more than 1 million dollars to invest. Mr.
Casserly further explained their negotiations with Moody's in New York regarding
an open ended indenture. Further discussion continued.
Mr. Casserly said they would be sending a packet of further information to Moody's
at the end of the week, and sometime after that they wish to make another per-
sonal presentation with members of the City. The Mayor suggested combining this
trip with one suggested by Springsted to try to get the City's bond rating higher.
Vierling/Wampach moved to authorize Mayor Reinke, the City Admr. and Finance Di-
rec,+ar +,Q ?,++prnd. at Raady's in New York, tentatively set for the week
of July 23, 1984.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
1Vr. u1.aS'cS stated thk!-; inta,-EtiaCk can q7;' &6 CGji%v^i tc?Li3' support L12,51211
tars- for- on-site- improvements,_ At to-dav's_ rates., an additional increment could
be taken off the racetrack, to be used downtown, or wherever the City decides.
Wampach/Leroux moved for a five minute recess at 9:28 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
Leroux/Wampach moved to re -convene at 9:38 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Discussion followed regarding staff of the Transit and Cable Commissions. The
City Admr. clarified that this position is not now anticipated to be shared with
Chaska.
Vierling/Leroux moved to direct the appropriate City officials to draft a job
description for a full-time Administrative Intern position incorporating the
duties of staffing the Cable Commission, the Transit Commission and assisting
in general administrative functions.
Roll Call: Ayes; Wampach, Vierling, Leroux, Colligap, Reinke
Noes; Lebens
Mo £io'ri carried. '
Shakopee City Council
July 3, 1984
Page 3.
Leroux/Vierling moved to direct the appropriate City officials to begin the
necessary advertising and recruiting to fill the position of the Administrative
Intern beginning October 15, 1984, at a salary of $5.75 per hour.
Roll Call: Ayes; Colligan, Reinke, Vierling, Leroux, Wampach
Noes; Lebens
Motion carried.
Lebens/Vierling moved to table consideration of Racetrack off-site improvements.
Motion carried unanimously.
The City Engineer explained City Hall radio modifications and needs.
Vierling/Colligan moved to authorize the purchase of a MAXAR-80 low band base
station, base station antenna and !�" HELIAZ cable and installation for an amount
of $2,048.25, to be paid from a transfer to be increased from $1,240.00 to
$2,048.25.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
Colligan/Wampach moved to authorize advertising for bids for the 1984 Pavement
Preservation Program, taking alternate bids on Asphalt -Rubber and Emulsified
Asphalt seal -coat.
R811 Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
Lem ux/Vierling moved to name the North/South Collector Street in Section 5,
Township 115, Range 22, Scott County Minnesota, to be Shenandoah Drive. Motion
carried unanimously.
Colligan/Lebens moved to approve -the Change Order No. 1 to the Huber Park Restroom
Facility for a net contract deduction of $893.91
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
Colligan/.Lebens moved to authorize staff to set up a Transit Fund in the City
budget for the Shakopee Transit System.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
Colligan/Lebens moved to declare two 350 CI rebuilt Chevrolet engines surplus
property and direct staff to dispose of said property pursuant to City Code 2.70,
Subd. 3B.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
Colligan/Lebens moved to recognize water usage records from other cities in
determining the sewer billing for new accounts when requested by the customer.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
Colligan/Lebens moved to authorize the release of the letter of credit and
$10,000 check related to the Racetrack back to the parties that provided them.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
Colli gan/Wampach moved that bills in the amount of $23,945.02 be allowed and
ordered. paid.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
The City Admr. explained the various items requested by the Building Official
for budget amendments. Cncl. Lebens said the City removed the exterior water
faucet from Holmes Park some years ago because the kids kept it running all the
time. Discussion followed regarding the storage needs, and the City Admr.
suggested Council looking at the present building and what needs storage.
Leroux/Vierling moved to authorize the Finance Director to reflect the requested
$54,050 on the Building Official's operating budget for 1984.
Roll Call: Ayes; Wampach, Vierling, Leroux, Colligan, Reinke
Noes; Lebens
Motion carried.
Leroux/Wampach moved to authorize the appropriate City Officials to execute a
Joint Powers Agreement between Scott County and the City of Shakopee for building
inspecting services dated July 9, 1984
Roll Call: Ayes; Reinke, Vierling, Colligan, Wampach, Leroux
Noes; Lebens
Motion carried.
Shakopee City Council
July 3, 1984 �
Page 4
Leroux/Wampach moved to authorize the hiring of LeRoy Heitz as a permanent
.part-time Building Inspector for a 12 -month period at the rate of $10.31 per
hour with normal pro rata benefits for a part-time permanent employee.
Roll Calla- Ayes; Colligan, Leroux, Vierling, Reinke, Wampach
Noes; Lebens
Motion carried.
The Finance Director gave some background on some of the items on the Capital
Equipment list. Discussion ensued and questions were asked about various
capital equipment items. The City Admr. will bring back further information
for follow-up on the 10th.
Lebens/Wampach moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into
a contract with Springsted, Inc. for Public Finance Advisor Services as outlined
in their six page contract submitted April 24, 1984 with the addition to Section
3 "Additional Services" as incorporated on Page 3 of said contract agreement.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
Leroux/Lebens offered Resolution No. 2278, A Resolution Establishing the Policy
for Funding Rehabilitation of Streets in the City of Shakopee, and moved its
adoption.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
Colligan�Lebens offered Resolution 2281, A Resolution Calling Public Hearing
on the Modification by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and For the
City of Shakopee of Minnesota River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project
No. 1 and the Modified Housing and Redevelopment Plan Relating Thereto, On the
Redesignation of Tax Increment District No. lA and the Modification of the Tax
Increment Financing Plan Relating Thereto, and on the Establishment of Tax in-
crement District No. 5 and the Approval and Adoption of a Tax Increment Financ-
ing Plan Relating Thereto, and moved its adoption.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes;None Motion carried.
Colli gan/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2282, A Resolution Approving Plans and
Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for the Improvement of Valley
y�yv�pt�i�a,nr'iAvenuei`rom Valley Park Drive to CR83
by Roadway, and moved its adoption.
Roll Call: Ayes; Wampach, Colligan, Leroux, Reinke, Vierling
Noes; Lebens
Motion carried.
The City Engineer explained the problem of getting around the racetrack site
because of the sand. Discussion followed.
Leroux/Wampach moved to direct staff to look into the purchase of a 4 wheel drive
ATV ad made by Honda or Yamaha, etc.
Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried.
Wampach/Leroux moved to direct staff to draft a letter to the Railroad requesting
upgrading of the railroad crossings in Shakopee. Motion carried unanimously.
Cncl. Leroux initiated discussion on the progress the City is making on the
streets in Deerview Acres. The City Admr. informed Council on what is being
done by the City and what is planned. He suggested bringing back further infor-
mation to the next meeting, especially regarding any possible assessments.
Lebons/Wampach moved to adjourn to July 10, 1984. Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 11:00 p.m.
Judith S. Cox
City Clerk
Diane S. Beuch
Recording Secretary
Jahn Anderson
City of Shakopee
129 East lst Ave.
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Northern States Power Company
Normandale Division
5309 West 70th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55435
Telephone (612) 941-2992
2,4ZZ, ��S i JoL c i ri ,, e, �t�1Z J Y�I "& 111 1"Itl� i� iluilt
its late -payment charge to all educati.,3nal and govern-
mental customers in August of this year. All other
classes of NSP customers now are subject to delinquent
charges; so we are extending this policy to include
educational and governmental accounts.
After investigating and reviewing testimony on this
matter, the Public Utilities Commission decided that
utilities should not exempt federal, state and local
governmental customers and educational customers from
uniform application of late -payment charges. Continued
exemption of those customers would constitute an un-
reasonable and unfair advantage to this class of customers
over other classes which already pay the tariff. NSP
agrees with the Commission's decision.
Bills mailed starting August 6, 1984 will be subject
to late -payment charges if payment is not received by
due date. Your billing indicates the date NSP must
receive payments in order to avoid a late -payment charge
of 1% percent of the unpaid balance, with a minimum
charge of $1.00.
If you have any questions, please contact Stuart Fraser
at 941-5423.
J. H. Mertz
Division General Manager
OTCONNOR & HANNAN
PATRICK J. oCONNOR
—MES P. oMEARA
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
JOE ALTERS
THOMAS A KELLER 2
OUGLAS FRANZEN
LLIAM O. HULL
PATRICK E. O•DONN£LL•
MICHAEL E. McGUIRE
ROBERT J. CHRISTIANSON, JR.
DAVID W KELLEY
STEVEN �. roq ER
3800 IDS TOWER
FAM En J. wA Z
5 R. DORSEY
DAVID KANT
NDA C. SCCHWARTZ
CAROL N. ARK
MICHAEL E.VEVE•
ANDREW J. SHEA
WILLIAM R.McGRANN
DOUGLAS M. CARNIVAL
ARLIN BI
RICHARD L EVANS
DORIE N. BENE..
80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET
KENT E. RICNi:Y
MESA.RRUBE
THOMAS
KEVIN M. BUSCH
wooDKIDMER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-2254
R.
ROBERA.T BUB ITOSHERARAN tN1G
JULE MVIRGINIA NAORD FORD
S
FREDERICK W. MORRIS
LLIAM C. lLY NN
LAUREN R. LONERGAN
DANI L L WILES
L. It T. SINNCR
(612) 341-3800
01
UW.
TELEX 29-0584
FREDERICK
THOMAS
WILLIAM C. KELLY
(1818-1070)
SUITE 4700, ONE UNITED BANK CENTER
1700 LINCOLN STREET
DENVER,COLORADO 80203 VELAZOUEZ, 21
WAITERS DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
(303) 830-1700 MADRID I, SPAIN
431-31-00
DAVID BURLINGAMC LARRY D. GALLEGOS TEL E% 235,13
MARTIN M. BERLINER. JENCE L THOMAS.
FIR nAPLAN• JAMES E. GIGAX• LCAL CIU
ROBERT WIEGAND II FRANK J. WIPGA-
Julv 3, 1984
M E M O R A N D U M
SUITE BOO
1919 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE N.W.
WASHINGTON, O. C. 20006- 3483
(202) 887-1400
PATRICK J. O�CONNOR
PATRICK E. O•DONN£LL•
EDWARD W. BROOKE•
JOSEPH BLATCHFORD•
JOHNJ. FLYNN
H ROBERT HALPER
THOMAB. EVANS, JR.•
DONALDS S. ARBOUR•
JOSEPH E. DILtON
T OMgSR ry. OUINN
CAROL N. ARK
MICHAEL E.VEVE•
D VID ME MORGA •
RYCMARD ORGAN
JOHN J. MILES•
JOSEPH E. PATTISON
AGM
LES J. EROSE
P. BOVLE
CHARLES W. GARRISON X-
GORDON K. GAYER
I, P, S
H E 5. F03TCR •
BRIAN P. PMELAN
CHRISTINA W. FLEPS
P. GORDON LEE •
THOMAS R. JOLLY •
CHgISTO PN EP D. COURSEN•
MARRY J. CUTLER•
CER C N. BE L.
PETER C, 133EL•
MICHAEL J. FERRELL,
CHARN EY PEGENSTEIN -
F COUH3
WILLIAM T. H NNAN
JOSEPH F. CASTIELLO•
NOT MEMBER OF MINNESOTA BAR
ITTEO IN VIRGINIA ONLY
RE: PROVISIONS OF THE U.S. HOUSE AND SENATE CONFERENCE COM-
MITTEE ON THE TAX BILL CONCERN_TNG INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
BONDS
The U.S. House and Senate Conference Committee has
reached agreement on the tax bill (the "Tax Bill"). The
full House and Senate must still approve the Tax Bill and
trio ?LCs'lde1iL 7,1ccist igTi it Deiore lit becomes e'rtective, but
final enactment is expected.
There follow some of the general highlights and effects
of the Tax Bill on industrial deveiepment bonds:
(1) Minnesota will have an annual volume of the
so-called private activity- bonds (basically, most indus-
trial development bonds) of $150 per person. The Minne-
sota Energy and Economic Deveicpcment Authority presently
estimates this volume liTiration for calendar •year 1984
to be $611,395,500.
(2) The present, December 31, 1986, sunset on the
exceptions for $1,000,0000 -and $10,000,000 small indus-
trial bond issues is retained, except that the sunset is
extended until December 31, 1988, for small issues for
manufacturing facilities, and the oer capita volume
limitation is accordingly recuced from. 5150 to $100 for
each of those additional two years.
(3) A state may reallocate its volume limitation
between that state and its local issuers before or after
the final enactment of the Tax Bill. This means that
Laws of Minnesota 1984, Chapter 582 (the "State Reallo-
S-
cation Act"), will be effective upon final enactment of
the Tax Bill. The House version of the Tax Bill previ-
ously provided that a state legislature may reallocate
the volume limitation only after the imposition of a
federal volume limitation.
(4) Bonds for which preliminary approval was given
before June 19, 1984, and which are issued before Janu-
ary 1, 1985, are not subject to the federal volume limi-
tation and are thus not subject to the State Realloca-
tion Act. This means that such qualifying issues will
not need any allocation from either an issuer's entitle-
ment allocation or from any other pool or reserve of -
total state allocation. It is our understanding that
MEEDA, from January 1 through June 20 of this year, has
approved aoproximately $385,000,000 of industrial bond
issues, most of which will be exempt from the volume cap
and the State Reallocation Act if they are actually
issued before the end of this year, relieving much of
the pressure on the volume cap for Minnesota in 1984.
(5) As provided in the State Reallocation Act,
within 15 days of the enactment of the Tax Bill, each
entitlement issuer must recertify the details respecting
its oast bond issues subject to volume limitation. In
most if not all cases, this recertification will be
identical to the first certification made by entitlement
issuers. We also understand that MEDA is presently
preparing and will be distributing a form for this re-
certification (as well as a new application for approval
and a new Project Closing and Notice of Issue form).
(6) Section. 20 of the State Reallocation Act (to
be codified as Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.23) will
become effective 90 days after the President signs the
Tax Bill. This new Section provides basically as fol-
lows:
(a.) The issuer must_ __--- _^4 c.._ proposed
project would noc be L'nderta:.{en ''Icut for c::e avail-
ability of industrial development bond financing."
(b) A "project" does not include an airplane,
a private luxury box, a gambling facility, or an
off -sale liquor store (all of which restrictions
are in the Tax Bili).
(c) No more than ten percent of a bond issue
may be used to finance "moveable equipment not
constituting a fixture."
- 2 -
(d) No more than 25 percent of an issue may
be used to finance the acquisition of land (this
also is in the Tax Bill but does not apply to bonds
issued before January 1, 1985, for which prelimi-
nary approval was given before June 1, 1984).
(e) Generally, no more than $10,000,000 of
industrial bonds may be issued for a single facil-
ity, without regard to ownership of condominium
units within that facility, thus preventing certain
multiple issues for separate borrowers for the same
or an integrated project (the Tax Bill also con-
tains a similar restriction, providing that all
such issues will be aggregated; however, this fed-
eral provision does likewise not apply to the cer-
tain bonds described in 5(d) above).
(7) The Tax Bill requires that the public offi-
cial, if any, responsible for allocating a portion of
the state volume cap to a particular issue must certify
under penalty of perjury that the allocation was not
made in consideration of any bribe, gift, gratuity, or
direct or indirect contributicn to any political cam-
paign.
(8) There is a new restriction to the effect that
the small issue exceptions will not apply (and such
bonds would thus be taxable) if any "test -period benefi-
ciary" of those bonds has attributed to it more than $40
million of any industrial development bonds.
(9) The Tax Bill imposes considerably more strin-
gent arbitrage restrictions, which are effective for
bonds issued after December 31, 1984, and which basi-
cally require that most arbitrage profits be paid to the
United States Treasury.
(10) No more than 25 percent of a bond issue may bc?
used for the acquisition of _and.
(11) No proceeds of such bond issues may be used
for the acquisition of existing property unless first
used pursuant to such acquisition, except that this
restriction does not apply to any building (and the
equipment therefor) if there is rehabilitation equal to
at least 15 percent of the portion of the cost of such
building (and equipment) financed from bond proceeds.
For facilities other than buildings (and the equipment
therefor) the rehabilitation must equal 100 percent of
the cost financed from bond proceeds, and in all cases
the rehabilitation must occur within two years of the
later of the date of acquisition of the property and the
- 3 -
date of bond issuance. It appears, but is not entirely
clear, that integrated building and equipment- purchases
would be subject only to the 15 percent rehabilitation
expenditure provision. This provision does not apply to
bonds issued before the end of this year for which pre-
liminary approval was given prior to June 1, 1984.
Please feel free to contact any of the following persons
from our office at area code 612 should you have any
questions on these new rules:
Kent Richey
Jim O'Meara
Arlin Waelti
Wood Kidner
Dan Wiles
343-1252
343-1288
343-1289
343-1299
34�-b219
- 4 -
SCOTT COUNTY
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
N�COURT
�a HOUSE A106
SHAKOPEE, MN. 55379-1396 (612)-445-7750, Ext. 346
Highway Engineer:
E. W. PRENEVOST
July 2, 1984
To: Land Owners Adjacent to County Road 83
K:,
JUL - 5 1984
(31-1 ' OF SHA KOPEE.
The 1984 Scott County Road Program provides for the regrading
and paving of County Road 83 between County Road 42 and County
State Aid Highway 16. This project had previously been scheduled
for construction in 1978; however, it was postponed for various
reasons.
The existing gravel road is deficient in cross section, structure
and design speed. It is difficult and expensive to maintain and
is generally rough and dusty in the summer.
We are presently completing the plans for the reconstruction and
paving of this section of County Road 83. Specific design will
be two 12 foot travel lanes with 8 foot paved shoulders, 4:1
inslopes, 8 foot ditch bottoms with 3.5 foot grade separation and
variable backslopes. The design speed is 50 MPH.
Basically, we will utilize the existing 66 foot right of way
and will generally be on the present road alignment. However,
it will be necessary to acquire additional right of way as the
normal distance to the outside of the ditch will be 40 feet.
We are therefore proposing acquisition of an additional 17 feet
on each side of the road for a total right of way width of 100
feet. This additional right of way will be acquired by Highway
Easement which is a permanent easement.
In addition, slope easements beyond the 50 foot right of way
may ha�ae to be obtained in some areas to properly construct the
bac'ks'lopes. Slope easements are 'temporary easements ana the 1a -n&
owners will retain full use of the land after construction has
been completed. The flattening of the slopes and the rounding
of the slope planes present a more natural appearance and reduce
_Prc�G;�on L9!9nsci_1 _£rnm__thesAr?re s..«i11 _bP_stockoilec3_and rQulaced
on the cuts after construction and all slopes will be seeded.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Front yards of homes and
necessary. The proposed
effect on the environment
erosion.
6 C_
-2-
ditch bottoms will be sodded where
construction will have no significant
and provisions are made to prevent
For the purpose of acquiring rights of way, the Scott County
Board has appointed Mr. Frank J. Wicker, 15870 Franklin Trail
S.E., Prior Lake, to act as appraiser. Mr. Wicker was one of
the appraisers for the project proposed in 1978. Please
contact Mr. Wicker at 447-6040 by Wednesday, July 11, 1984 if
you wish to accompany him at the time of inspection of your
property affected. Your cooperation in adhering to this
deadline would be appreciated as we would like the construction
of this project to begin as soon as possible.
After appraisals have been completed, you will be sent an offer
based on the appraisal. Personnel from the Scott County High-
way Department will then contact you to schedule a time to meet
with you relative to this offer and review this construction
project.
Sincerely,
Daniel M. Jobe, P.E.
Ass't County Highway Engineer
DMJ:re
June 26, 1984
Mayor Eldon Reinke
City of Shakopee
2569 Hauer Trail
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Mayor Reinke:
Per our discussion, please accept my resignation from the
Shakopee Planning Commission. Continuing business travel
pressures will not enable me to significantly improve my
meeting attendance. Based on discussions at our last
Planning Commission meeting, T feel the Commission can
best be served by a person able to offer maximum attendance.
Please extend to all the members of the Council my appreciation
for the opportunity to have been a part of the Shakopee Planning
Commission.
Sincerely,
Fred W. Coller
906 Ramsey Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
/jk
T 0
July 3, 1984
TO: Scott County Mayors
Scott County Administrators/Clerks
FROM: Glenda D. Spiotta, Recording Secretary
SUBJECT: Participation in Scott County's
Criminal Justice Advisory Committee (CJAC)
Activities
On behalf of the Chairman of the Scott County Criminal
Justice Advisory Committee, it is brought to your immediate
attention that your jurisdiction's representation and
active participation is urgently needed on the CJAC. At
the last meeting of the CJAC on June 20, 1984, the Committee
in concensus agreed to the necessary and regular attendance
of representatives from your community at subsequent CJAC
meetings. Underway is a consideration of Jail Planning for
Scott County, and a Jail Planning Sub -Committee is to be
established at the July 25, 1984, CJAC meeting.
The Criminal Justice Advisory Committee meets on the
third Wednesday evening of each month at 7:00 p.m. and
usually adjourns by 9:00 p.m. Please contact your representa-
tive for the CJAC to ascertain his/her interest in attending
future CJAC meetings as Scott County reviews and plans for
a future Jail facility.
We would appreciate•a response from you as soon as possible
in order to provide background materials to your designee
prior to the July CJAC meeting.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
NOTE: Tom Brownell said in the past we have appointed a citizen from the
Civil. Service Commission to serve on this committee. John Roepke served before
and lost interest because they made little progress. Current Civil Service
Commission members rare: Dan eil, Virgil Mears and John Rpepke.
�w
�qq �-
iffF CEI''_
JUL 131984
CITY QF SHAKOPEE
ILII
0-0
C "o,
gal
1
k"j), �
�i
i
j
0
i
a
7c/
i�i
'sa
E
a �
� o
. e
t
9
j
F
)kj
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A Partnership Including Professional Corporations
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
510 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER (612)340-2600 201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
445 MINNESOTA STREET 8 THIRD STREET NORTH
ST.PAUL,MINNESOTA 55101 TELEX:29-0605 GREAT FALLS,MONTANA 59401
(612)227-8017 TELECOPIER: (612)340-2868 (406)727-3632
P.O.BOX 848 SUITE 675 NORTH
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING 1800 M STREET N.W.
ROCHESTER,MINNESOTA 55903 WASHINGTON,D.C.20036
(507)288-3156 (202)955-1050
312 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING 30 RUE LA BOETIE
WAYZATA,MINNESOTA 55391 ROBERT A.SCHMELZER 75008 PARIS,FRANCE
(612)475-0373 (612)343-7992 011 331 562 32 50
July 17 , 1984
r ? vz,
J U L 171984
City Council
City of Shakopee I �� .�; r# :
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Re: Proposed Public Improvement Project
No. 84-4
Gentlemen:
On behalf of our client, Silverhawk N.V. , a
Netherlands Antilles corporation, owner of that certain land
located in Section 5, Township 115, Range 22 , as described on
Exhibit A attached hereto, we hereby submit a protest of and
an objection to the proposed special assessment against our
client' s land for the following reasons :
1 ) a. Since the main purpose of construction of the
roadway improvement at this time is to benefit
the parcel of land which is being developed as
a racetrack, all the construction costs of such
roadway should be borne by the City.
b. Alternatively, the benefitted area for the
purpose of spreading the special assessment
should be increased to include all other
property benefitting from the roadway including
the racetrack parcel since it is most directly
benefitted from the roadway.
2 ) The incremental cost of the road construction
(that portion of the cost of the proposed
roadway over and above the cost of any roadway
which might be constructed by our client to most
efficiently develop our client ' s land) should
be borne solely by the City since the main
purpose of the road is to provide access to the
racetrack.
DORSEY & WHITNEY
City Council
City of Shakopee
July 17, 1984
Page Two
3 ) Any such assessment and interest thereon should
be deferred until such time as Silverhawk N.V.
would have otherwise constructed such road in
connection with the development of its property.
In addition, absent the action taken by the City of
Shakopee, the opportunities available for the development and/or
sale of the property owned by Silverhawk N.V. would have
determined whether any roadway should be constructed across
Silverhawk ' s property and, if a roadway was needed, the location
thereof. The construction of the roadway by the City of
Shakopee may have a detrimental effect on the options and
opportunities available for the development of Silverhawk' s
property and therefore its value.
Finally, Silverhawk N.V. intends to carefully review
the amount of any special assessments against its land and to
object to any such assessment that exceeds the benefit received.
You should direct copies of any correspondence
regarding this protest or the assessment to the undersigned.
Our client specifically reserves the right to appeal any
determination on this matter to the appropriate courts .
Very truly yours,
Robert A. Schmelzer
RAS/j as
Attachment
l
EXHIBIT A
All that part of the North one-half of Section 5, Township 115, Range 22,
Scott County, Minnesota, lying South of the Southerly Right-of-way line of
the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Railway Company as the same
is now located and established over and across said Section 5; Excepting
therefrom the following three tracts:
Tract No. 1.
Beginning at a .point on the South line of the Northeast Quarter of said
Section 5, which said point is 2,026.60 feet West of the Southeast corner
of said Northeast Quarter; thence continuing West on said South line a
distance of 276.40 feet; thence Northerly at right angles to said South line
a distance of 187.00 feet; thence Easterly at right angles a distance of
276.40 feet; thence Southerly a distance of 187.00 feet to the point of
beginning.
Tract No. 2.
That part of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 5, Township 115, Range 22,
Scott County, Minnesota, lying Southerly of the Southerly right-of-way of the
Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Railroad and lying Easterly of the
following described line: Beginning at a point on the South line of said
Northeast Quarter of Section 5, said point being 572.50 feet Westerly from
the Southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of Section 5, as measured
along said South line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 5; thence Northerly
parallel with the East line of said Section 5 to said Southerly right-of-way
line of the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Railroad and there
terminating.
Tract No. 3.
The [Fest 1234.91 feet as measured at right angles to the West line thereof,
of that part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 115, Range 22,
Scott County, Minnesota, lying South of the Southerly right of way line of
the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Railway Company, as the same
is now located and established over and across said Section 5. EXCEPTING
therefrom the South 639.08 feet, as measured at right angles to the South
line thereof of said Northwest Quarter of said Section 5.
- �
MEMORANDUM
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administ
FROM: H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Shenandoah Drive (N/S Collector6�~
�~. �=^
in Section 5, T115, R 22) Improvement
DATE: July 16, 1984
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is Resolution No. 2283 a Resolution Ordering the Im-
provement of Shenandoah Drive, by roadway.
BACKGROUND:
City Council will hold a public hearing on the improvment of
Shenandoah Drive, the North/South Collector on July 17, 1984.
Based on earlier conversations with property owners, there are
two issues that will be raised at the hearing, one is the defer-
red assessment and the other is the length of the roadway exten-
sion.
Most of the property owners that would receive a deferred assess-
ment were knowledgable attorneys and were skeptical of the defer-
ral mechanism. As a matter of principal, I expect most proper-
ties will appeal the assessment when levied. The City has al-
ready asked the Condemnation appraiser, Shenehon & Associates,
Inc. , to be prepared to undertake "Benefit " appraisals shortly
after the condemnation work is complete.
The other issue raised was the question of how far the road
was extended. Mr. Scherber, Contract for Deed owner of the
40 acres adjacent and west of the Racetrack site advised the
City of his interest in extending the roadway into his parcel.
I explained that this may not be possible if the construction
schedule is to be maintained, but I would check with the City' s
consultant. Barton-Aschman will be prepared to address this
matter at the hearing.
After hearing the testimoney at the hearing, it is recommended
that City Council order this project by adopting, Resolution
No. 2283, a Resolution ordering the project and designating
the engineer.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt Resolution No. 2283, a Resolution Ordering the Improvement
of Shenandoah Drive by Roadway, Public Improvement 1984-4.
HRS/pmp
R .7
RESOLUTION NO. 2263
A Resolution Ordering the Improvement of
Shenandoah Drive (N/S Collector Street
Section 5, 115, 22) by Roadway
Public Improvement No. 1984-4
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2263 of the City Council adopted
the 19th day of June, 1984, fixed the date for a Council hearing
on the proposed improvement of the North-South Collector Street
by roadway in Section 5, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County,
Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, City Council subsequently named said North-South
Collector Street , Shenandoah Drive; and
WHEREAS, Ten ( 10) days published notice of the hearing
through two (`) weekly publications of the required notice was
given and the hearing was held thereon the 17th day of July,
19841 at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an
opportunity to be heard thereon; an
WHEREAS, the Shakopee Public Ut i l i y Commiss i on has reviewed
said proposed project and gives favorable gable? recommendation.
NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOREE, MINNESOTA:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in Council
Resolution No. 2263 adopted June 19, 1984.
C. John C. Mullen, Barton-Aschman, Inc. is hereby designated
as the engineer- for this improvement and he shall prepare plans
and specifications for making such improvement.
3. The work on this project is hereby designated as a part
of the 1984-4 Public Improvement.
Adopted in _ session of the City Council of
the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held ;his _ cl-Ay of
19
Mayer of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this _ day of
City Attorney —`__
v
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson , City Administrator ga*
FROM: Judi Simac , City Planner
RE: Racetrack Area Study Plan
DATE: July 13 , 1984
Introduction
Please find attached a copy of the draft final report on the
planning and zoning study of the racetrack area as prepared
by Howard Dahlgren Associates , Inc . John Shardlow , the planning
consultant , was present at the July 12th meeting of the Planning
Commission to present the report and participate in the discussion .
Background
The draft final report makes the following recommendations :
1 . Change the R-4 zoning west of the ractrack to I- 1 Light
Industrial ( see Figure 4) . The R-4 removed from the area
would be re-established in the area of the intersection
of CR 17 and the proposed By-Pass .
2 . Pursuant to the three specific zoning change requests it
is recommended that :
a . The moratorium is permitted to expire without any action
being taken on the 3 rezoning requests .
b . The Planning Commission forwards a recommendation to
City Council to change the R-4 zoning which is directly
related to the racetrack.
C . A land use study of the entire B-2 District be done
within, the next few weeks .
d . No action be taken on rezoning requests until the Planning
Commission and City Council can review the results of
a land use study within the entire B-2 District .
3 . Changes in the permitted and conditional uses in the following
zoning districts :
a . I-1 : Remove tobacco products as a conditional use
b . I-2 : Commercial recreation from permitted to conditional
use
C . B-1 : Commercial recreation from permitted to conditional
use/eliminate mobile home parks as conditional uses
d . R-4 : Add mobile home parks as a conditional use
4 . Standards be adopted for aesthetic and architectural control
in multiple Residential , Business and Industrial zones .
The standards would be included in the building permit review
process and address building materials , parking setbacks ,
landscaping requirements , and screening of roof top utilities ,
parking areas , outdoor storage , trash handling , and loading
nnH g0ri,i nc nrnac . Final l in „^rrn , � . +� +. - t'_ A rA _.
The discussion at the meeting continued with more detailed comments
which will be included in the final version of the report .
It was agreed that 1 ) an ad hoc committee made up of City staff,
legal counsel , area developers , Chamber of Commerce , etc . would
get together for a workshop meeting to draft acceptable language
regarding performance standards , 2) the term "commercial recreation"
will be defined to clarify code interpretation , 3) additional
recommendations will be included to support the discussion concensus
that the industrial zones should not be expanded to include
retail business , and 4) a request to have veterinarian clinics
as a conditional use in the 1-2 district will be recommended .
A proposed schedule of dates to proceed with the discussion
and subsequent public hearings was presented by staff to the
Planning Commission . It was recommended by staff to proceed
with ordinance amendments to revise the performance standards ,
permitted and conditional uses and the subject R-4 property
adjacent to the racetrack , whereas a recommendation on the three
rezoning requests should be delayed a few weeks until a B-2
land use study could be completed . The Planning Commission
chose to select August 9th as a public hearing date on the amend-
ments , including consideration of the three proposed rezoning
requests . The requests will be considered singularly , not as
a collective rezoning . However , Planning Commission did indicate
that they would appreciate having as much information on the
existing B-2 area as possible whL6n considering the B-1 rezoning
requests.
Recommendation
The Planning Commission approved a motion to recommend to the
City Council that the draft final report as prepared by Howard
Dahlgren Associates be accepted with the following exceptions :
1 . At this time the R-4 being removed from the west side of
the racetrack ( rezoned to I- 1 ) not be re-established in
the area of CR 17 and the by-pass . c
y _y -U-11
y _ l.� ii.t rF .�v�i� iiz.:�:J'1.l'v�1 `VJ'1 X11 1irV1.LU d , UV.L'.c t1�
'rC31 �lt is l�� _--Le —,l 1 1 1 1 l_)`
ether a land three rezoning requests irregardless as to wh
ct . use study is conducted for the entire B-2 Distri
fitionai uaes 3. E21iyr1, a t*.tr ati3' ctiarlotFs ii-i t`ht6 gtFriif.iUt ed (Jr, uurf(
)me parks as for the R-4 District (not to include mobile he
conditional uses) .
ild not apply 4 . The parking setback performance standard shop
to the B-3 District .
Action Requested
emendation on Motion to request the Planning Commission ' s recor
lan . the draft final report of the Racetrack Area Study P
JS/jms
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson , City Administrator U
FROM: Judi Simac , City Planner
RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendments (Transportation)
DATE: July 13 , 1984
Introduction
At the July 12 , 1984 meeting of the Planning Commission a motion
was approved to recommend to the City Council an alternative
for dealing with the residual road cul-de-sac on the western
border of the racetrack .
Background
Although the Metropolitan Council approved both the sewer and
transportation amendments to the Comp Plan on June 14 , 1984
the issue of the north-south collector cul-de-sac still needs
to be resolved within City Hall . The Planning Commission discussed
the following alternatives :
1 . Amend the subdivision and/or zoning code to provide for
roads that terminate at regional facilities to exceed the
maximum length of a cul-de-sac .
2 . Determine that the City must obtain a variance from the
subdivision code to exceed the cul-de-sac length.
3 . Extend the road through to CR 16 .
4 . Take no action .
5 . Determine that the road shall remain a temporary cul-de-sac
and plan for future extension of the road to CR 16 .
Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommends alternative #5 for the following
reasons :
a . Extension of the road will relieve traffic congestion at
CR 16 and 17 .
b. The road extension will support future development to the
west (of the road) .
C . The road extension will provide for the development of adjacent
property of which the owners have already expressed an interest
in petitioning for the road .
d . The Planning Commission is uncomfortable with the term regional
facility and how that can be defined .
Action Requested
Motion to accept the Planning Commission ' s recommendation on
the north-south collector street cul-de-sac .
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Admin.
FROM: Judith S . Cox, City Clerk
RE : Application For Taxicab License
by Wells Taxi .
J
DATE: July 12 , 1984
INTRODUCTION:
The City has received an application for a taxicab license
from Ronald P. Wells of Wells Taxi , 7600 Penn Ave . , Richfield,
Minnesota .
BACKGROUND:
The Police Department has no information which would be
_vb33S�1S fns �
I >aa arrrrip0
tial- A taxicab service may have some impact on the City ' s c
1 a-ride which will be implemented this Fall , however, it wil
Tents enhance it because the dial-a-ride will not transport resit
beyond the City limits .
ALTERNATIVES :
a ] Approve .
b] Deny.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the application and grant a taxicab license tc
afield, Ronald Phillip Wells , Wells Taxi , 7600 Penn Ave . #252, Rich
Codei Mn. ( 55369 ) for three vehicles upon compliance with the City
ddi- and approve the rates for $ . 95 lst 1/11th mile, $ . 20 each a
.ding tional 2/liths mile , $12 .00 per hour of waiting time , inclu
time lost in traffic delays .
JSC/bn
Att .
i
TO: Mayor, Council Members
FROM: Tom Brownell, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Taxi Cab License Application
DATE: July 12, 1984
INTRODUCTION
Ronald P. Wells, 7600 Penn Avenue South, Richfield, MN. , Wells Taxi ,
has made application for a Shakopee Taxi Cab License.
BACKGROUND
The applicant is currently licensed by the City of Edina and
Metropolitan Airport Commission and reportedly is one of the
better operators. Mr. Wells' vehicles are inspected by the City
of Edina and airport, who require stringent inspection procedures.
Appropriate inquiries have been completed with the other licensing
agencies which required minimal effort by this department.
RECOMMENDATION
The police department has no basis to recommend denial of a
license to Wells Taxi Cab Company . mould consideraiving
the required vehicle insoect-ion .and
of_ inspection_..
1fl, 1 cmva-ay
livhlic. liacilitg insNsrmce
carried gait': o4ti ai.
se':iv S i
G_Lt6
c�>ti! ..L f
._ w' i t t� 1 irr i t s
perso-dal injury to one person, $ �F`''r'r �:`_ 'c.Jury in one
accident,_ $ C proU��rtti; clamas.f> ;qac!:- acc_i: ent_.__
11. Other m=icipAlities in which ycu
12. have you ever been ref usvd a ta%ica_b a r _' rt r : _.... _ `)Y ahem?�..___M�_
T.71..• ntlY .
13. Please attach a rate schedule. Any inc:c.ascs in. r:-- > ::h:11 be subject
to approval by the City Council.
14. Please include with application, the fol.lowiiF; fees.-
Application
ees:
Application Fee: $5.00
.Annual Taxicab License Fee: $250.00
Annual Fee Per Vehicle: $.15.00
I UNDERSTAND THAT FALSIFICA'T'ION OF ANY I` E'M -MN ITIS t`F?1,1C.ATI`A iS SUFFICIENT
REASON UPON WHICH TO BASE A DENIAL OF SAID OR T'r:.r;,%:titr,T10'1 TVI: FEOF.
Date4_A— if / � � Sign utere7�.
THE SIIAKOPEE POLICE DEPARTMENT WILL CAUSE At.' C"N EACt? APPLICANT
... _..,.� �. I1I?S?�7N<- 0 �'elll7rA11 I T(` ryCF F3?'r'?TA'. j rTmv- "m
Vt 1 1l J 1 t\ice.. L
arSnu, &fp, dt,) ja<u" , I 1 ��/�,t
9/,
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Admin.
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Application for On Sale 3.2 Beer License
and Set-up License by Coll Prahm, Inc. -
2400 East 4th Avenue.
DATE: July 12, 1984
INTRODUCTION:
The City has received applications for an On Sale 3.2 beer
license and a set-up license from Coll Prahm, Inc. - 240 East 4th
Avenue.
D A 0T r nn/%T TTTT _
Proper notice has been given in the official newspaper and
the applications are in order.
AT TL'D AT A T T 17 L' C` .
11 Approve.
2] Deny.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve the applications and grant an On Sale 3.2 Beer License
and a Set-up License to Coll Prahm, Inc. - 2400 East 4th Avenue.
JSC/bn
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Admin.
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE-: Shakopee Jaycees - Temporary On
Sale 3.2 Beer License.
DATE: July 17, 1984
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
The City has received an application for a temporary
beer license from the Shakopee Jaycees at Tahpah Park. The
application is in order.
ACTION RECOMMENDED:
Approve application and grant a temporary on sale 3.2
beer license to Shakopee Jaycees, at Tahpah Park for July
29, 1984.
JSC/bn
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director
RE: - Downtown Revitalization Report
DATE: July 13, 1984
INTRODUCTION
Tfihe-llowntown-Uommittee"has submittdd'its llowntown Kevitiii-
zation Report to the City Council for approval. Attached are
-commeriLs from 'tne 'Vianding `Uomiftssion,-inbustriai `Lommerdidi
Commission and the minutes of the Downtown Committee's public
meeting on June 26, 1994, for 0nuncil review prior to taking
action. The Council must determine the additional information
it needs and scheduling in considering this report.
BACKGROUND
The Downtown Revitalization Report has been distributed to
the following individuals, groups, or agencies:
11 City Council
21 Planning Commission
31 Industrial Commercial Commission
4] Chamber of Commerce Representative
5] News Media (newspaper and radio)
61 Shakopee Development Corporation
71 Financial Institutions (4)
81 Shakopee Public Utilities
9] Library
The Downtown Committee held a public meeting on June 26th
for which more than 150 letters of notification were sent to
downtown property owners and businessmen. More than 50 persons
attended the meeting, the minutes (unapproved) of which are
attached.
-The Industrial Commercial Commission reviewed the report at
its July 11, 1984, -meeting. A memo summarizing their action is
attached. The Planning Commission reviewed the report at its
July 12, 1984, meeting. A memo summarizing their action is
attached.
TheCouncilrequested a
second public meeting
be set to
.rev;zui, ib i`�"�i'vii
}i t
i'i'i �iiiif S
i�iiiS ti.�.ti�iZ1� 'LIa,-:o
July 31, 1984, at
7:00 p.m.
in the First National
Bank Community
Downtown Revitalization Report
Page 2
July 13, 1984
room. A large front page article on this meeting appeared in the
Shakopee Valley News on July 11, 1984. The attached letter will
e sent out to downtown property owners and businesses on Tuesday,
July 17th, to notify them of their meeting.
Council has had the benefit of reviewing the report itself
and reviewing staff reports for and recommendations from two of
its Commissions. On July 31st, the Council will have the benefit
of public comments.
REQUESTED ACTION
The Council should determine if it would like further staff
definition of the major policy issues addressed in the report or
further information or formal presentations from the Downtown
Committee. The Council should also determine when it needs all
information to be assembled for Council to take its formal action
on this report.
JA/bn
Att.
Z I
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Admin.
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director
RE: - Industrial Commercial Commission Recommendation
on Downtown Revitalization Report.
DATE: July 13, 1984
INTRODUCTION
The Downtown Committee has spearheaded the development of
the Downtown Revitalization Report which has recently been cir-
culated to the City Council, Planning Commission and the Indus-
trial Commercial Commission (ICC) for review. This memo is to
convey the action on this report by the Industrial Commercial
Commission at its July 11, 1984, meeting.
BACKGROUND
The ICC received copies of the report and addendum in advance
and the enclosed memo dated July 5th to create a focus for the
discussion. Downtown Committee Chairman Gary Laurent and City
staff were available to answer questions. Al Furrie, Jim O'Neill,
Gary Eastland, Jane DuBois, Jake Manahan and Bud Berens (liaison)
attended from the ICC. Karen Lebens was in the audience and
raised certain concerns she has regarding the plan. After much
discussion, the following motion was adopted unanimously:
Eastland/Manahan move to accept the Downtown Revitalization
Plan and Addendum as presented, with the recommendation that
more consideration be given to issue numbers 3, 4 and 5 of
the July 5. 1984, memorandum to the ICC from the Community
Development Director as follows: (See ;; for recommendation).
31 Does the ICC support the construction of a mini -
by -pass downtown and vacation of streets as noted
in the plan (pages 59-61)?
ICC recommends further consideration should be iven
to the mini -by-pass intersection at Sommerville%
Spenser area as a point of arrival.
41 Does the ICC support development through Planned Unit
Development(PUD) in the downtown? (Pages 63-64).
51 Does the ICC support the institution of design stan-
dards downtown, objectives on pages 62-63 and stan-
dards outlined in Section I, beginning on page 68?
r
Industrial Commercial Commission Recommendation
on Downtown Revitalization Report.
Page 2
July 13, 11984
JA/bn
Enc.
The ICC recommends further study to adopt either
a PUD concept for the Downtown Redevelopment
District and/or a design standards ordinance for
the Downtown Redevelopment District to insure a
development theme.
TO: Industrial/Commerical Commission (ICC)
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director
RE: Downtown Revitalization - Final Renort
DATE: July 5, 1984
Introduction:
The Downtown Committee's "Downtown Revitalization - Final
Report" was provided to the ICC prior to the public meeting on
that report held June 26, 1984. The ICC was tentatively set
to review this report at its July 11, 1984, meeting. This memo
is to focus ICC discussion on those issues which might be the
most controversial or most pertinent to the ICC.
Background:
The revitalization study (first part of report, Sections
I-V) serves to define the downtown, strengths and weaknesses,
which is to be redeveloped. It is hoped that this information
will be valuable to City policy makers in other endeavors, but
the use in this report is to document the background information
which led the Downtown Committee to reach the proposed solutions.
Comments from the ICC on this information, particularly its ac-
curacy and completeness, would be useful. However more valuable
is the determination that the solutions in the Implementation
portion of the report are reasonable responses to the given set
of circumstances.
The following are issues raised by the implementation portion
of the report which the ICC may wish to review:
1. Can the downtown reasonably absorb the additional
development proposed under the economic development
objectives on pages 57 and 58?
2. Does the ICC support the public assistance mechanisms
outlined under financial feasibility objectives on
pages 58 and 59?
3. Does the ICC support the construction of a mini -by-pass
downtown and vacation of streets as noted in the plan
(pages 59-61)?
4. Does the ICC support development throught Planned Unit
Development (PUD) in the downtown? (pages 63-64)
5. Does the ICC support the institution of design standards
downtown, objectives on pages 62 - 63 and standards out-
lined in Section I, beginning on page 68?
6. Does the ICC support a 25% special assessment to benefited
property owners to help finance proposed public improvements?
(pages 76 and addendum No. 1)
7. Does the ICC support the concept of. a Downtown
Development Corporation that would take on functions
similar to shopping center management? (Page 77)
8. Does the ICC consider the expenditures and revenue
sources reasonable and prudent? (pages 83-85)
9. Does the ICC support the requirement that all downtown
properties bring their signs into conformance within
five years of implementation of new sign provisions?
(Addendum No. 1)
These questions are meant to promote discussion, but ICC
members should feel free to introduce their own questions and
concerns and focus the discussion on those issues of greatest
concern to the Commissioners.
Requested Action:
Review the report and make a recommendation to the City
Council. Alternatives are:
1) Accept the report (and addendum No. l) as presented
by the Downtown Committee and recommend its approval
by the City Council.
2) Accept the report (and addendum No. 1.) as modified
by the ICC, and recommend approval of the report by
the City Council with modifications suggested by the
ICC.
3) Recommend that the City Council not accept the report
or refer it back to the Downtown Committee for further
study and revision.
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Admin.
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director
RE: Downtown Revitalization Report
DATES July 13, 1984
INTRODUCTION
The Downtown Committee Report was considered by the Planning
Commission at its July 12, 1984 meeting. The memo is to summarize
their action at that meeting.
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission received the attached staff report
to assist in their discussion. The issue was handled very late
on the Agenda and not a lot of discussion took place. However,
the Planning Commission was basically supportive of the report
with the desire to spend more time on the points raised in the
following motion which was adopted unanimously:
Schmitt/Rockne moved that the Planning Commission make
a favorable recommendation to City Council on the
Downtown Revitalization Report subject to the resolution
of zoning and land use issues and that both design cri-
teria in the development district and signage for develop-
ment district be incorporated into an ordinance.
JA/bn
Att.
MEMO TO: Shakopee Planning Comm i qv ion
FROM: Judi Simac, City Planner
RE: Downtown Revitalization -- Final Report -
DATE: July 5, 1984
Introduction:
The Shakopee Downtown Committee has recently released
their final report on the Downtown Revitalization. The
report consists of two sections: 1) The analysis of the
existing downtown core area and 2) The Implementation Plan
which describes the process of. recievel.opment. At the July 12th
meeting the Planning Commission will be asked to comment on the
final report and make a recommendaticn, to the City Council.
Background_
There are three major plonni"I ;sues dit:t'usund within the
report. They are 1.) Zoning and Tom& Use 2) Dr: -N opment Design
Review and 1) Signs.
Zon i n and I -and Use:
The exis-ting zoni!ICj within thu downtown Ludy area
includes R-2, R -i, B-1 and Q. 'r'V majority CSL the down-
town district lies within the D-; which permi t g uses such
as retail shops, offices, restaurants, and ! uitipla dwellings
with a Conditional Use Permit. The other I a jnr portion of the
downtown area i -r R-3 which permits mid densi t_y :_nsi.dential and
nct retail or professional off.ic eg. (See attacli!!ont of existing
zoning.)
The existing land uses in the CPD include financial., retail,
Office, in �tituti.ona.l , res ide!atia f and auto rolat� d.
On February 7, 1984 the City Coy ncil approved a land concept
plan (alternative plan P.-1 revise"i) upon the rc!commendation of
the ICC and I'1:Inning Corn;i .:,ion. `I'hn concept plan illustrates
areas for pull i c land, retail corp', institutional tinct housing
development. In some instances, the location of the proposed
land uses conflicts with the existi.nq zoning. Fo.r example, an
arra proposed for housing between Scott and Fuller Streets is
partially zoned A-1.
The report recommends the use of the Planned Unit Develop-
meot Section (P.U.D.) for development of the I esidential and
commercial areas in the Land Use Plan. The P.U.D. guidelines
require a conditional use permit for approval of a P.U.D.
Accordingly this procedure would provide for a public hearing
before the Planning Commission. This procodur" will cause a
conf=lict when the "Land Use Plein" and WAi.ng Wr a parcel are
not, con1pa t: i b i e .
As an alternative to th.is sit.uat.i.on, staff recommonds
that either 1 ) a new zoning distr.i.ct is created for the
downtown area or 2) An overlay zor() is designed for the
downtown area to bring sorrel conformity between tt:e ,xist:ing
zoning and the land use plan.
xShould the PI-anning Commission prefer a nc>>w _zoning
district to the P.U.D. concept, the Com,"lission may want to
direct staff to further research pons i tale stands, rc?s for such
a zoning district.
Development Design Review:
The report recommends that a design tone and standards
be established to guide future development in the downtown.
As stated, all final design will be subject to review and
approval by the City of Shakopee so that co-ordination among
various land use sections can bo maintained. elements
to be reviewed include: lighting, plant material, building
exterior treatments, signs, and pedr.rstrj.an arnel.it..ie�;.
If it i_3 determined that the DO�ti'litG?^Jn LGIT1iT11tt:E_'c 41111
review des._gn concepts, a con f l lct %art I l ar I so 471 T} a develop-
ment needs to obtain a condit. iona 1 us rler I.it . is ;cel, the
developer may have to appear. before two corzu;li.srs tolls to g(, -2t an
approval of his plans. An alternative ma,y be a joint meeting
of the Planning Commission and Downtown Review Committe_e to sl_.ee(1
tip the process or the r)owntown Commi_i t (�e CC'dir1C� t!;i�i-r review
function to the Plann.inc, ConuP,.is:-;ion.
Si- ns :
The report provides specific guidelines for signs within
the Downtown area which do not correspond with current code
provisions. It suggests that the Downtown Review committee
reviews all sign treatments for compliance.
Since the issuance of the final report the Downtown Com-
mittee has adopted a mot -.ion requesting a) that the design
recommendations for signs, to the extent possible, l,e incor-
porated into the City's sicln ordinance, b) that the City
staff be the review authority with appeals to the Downtown
Design Review C'onm l ttee and c) all. si(tns in the downtown area
be made to conform to the ordinance within five Years.
Again a conflict of if you w1._11; Design
Review committee vs. Hoard of Adjustment and Apl.)eals on sign
enforcement and variances. Staff Administration of the code
provisions could be simplified by the designation o, a Down-
town zoning district.
In
conclusion, it
should be noted that
all. -hough a seperate
Downtown
committee has
worked very hard for
a long period of
time to
cone up with a
1an;.l use plan and developwer;t
guidelines
for the
downtown area,
the "owntown redevelopment
is a key
aspect in
the overall
pla;in.ing and growth of
t},r:' C;ity of Shakopee.
0
Action Requested:
Discuss the Downtown Revitalization Final Report as it
relates to planning issues and;
1. Confirm that the final report presents a well
planned approach to downtown revitalization, and;
2. To comment as to how the report recommendations can
be integrated with existing planning and zoning pro-
visions and administrative procedures.
71 �.
,
4
' t
w
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
DOWNTOWN AD HOC COMMITTEE
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
JUNE 26, 1984
I
Chrm. Laurent called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m.
Members present: Mike Sortum, Joe Topic, Terry Link, Steve Clay, Dan Steil,
Bill Wermerskirchen, Jr. and Don Martin.
Members absent: Jerry Wampach and James Stillman.
Also present were: Jeanne Andre, Comm. Develop. Dir.; Trevor Walsten, Ass't
City Attorney; Jack Lynch, Westwood Planning & Engineering consultant; Paul
Wermerskirchen, ICC liaison; Frank Reid, Chamber of Commerce president; Cncl.
Gloria Vierling, and Lee Stoltzman anti Dave Czaja of the Planning Commission
and John K. Anderson, City Admr.
Cham. Laurent initiated the introduction of the Downtown Committee members and
other City officials.
Chrm. Laurent then gave some hackgrotM on t.hc; for•m,LLion of i'Ad Hoc (single
purpose) committee organized for the redevelopment of the downtown area. He
stated they have only recommendation power, wi.c:;r.,A.n they report their findings
and opinions to various community groups and the City Council, and the City
Council has the final authority for making any decisions.
This committee's on-going goal is to create an economically viable downtown.
Chrm. Laurent stressed that it will take the people of the downtown area united
with the people of Shakopee's government and City staff, developers and resources
both inside and outside Shakopee to make these changes. He said this plan as
presented tonight does not contain definite concrete plans for everything, and
does not provide a definite time line. Chrm. Laurent explained that the City
employed a consultant, Westwood Planning & Engineering, who have had a lot of
experience doing the sort of thing we want done in Shakopee. He compared the
downtown area to a shopping center, which is designed to be economically viable
and a pleasant place to shop.
Chrm. Laurent said the first task of the Committee was to identify the problems
of downtown. The No. 1 problem is the traffic. He said the study found 24,000
vehicles per day go through lst Avenue, 30o of which is truck traffic. The study
also found that 851jo of that traffic is going right through downtown and doesn't
do the retailers any good. Pedestrian traffic is only what is absolutely neces-
sary. The study also found there is plenty of parking in the downtown area, but
two of the lots are north of lst Avenue and have a lot of vacancies, whereas
other lots are always full. The study also found that 40o of the City's space
is taken with streets and alleys, which is not desirable because of the value of
property.
Chrm. Laurent said all agree that arriving in Shakopee from the north was not a
positive sight. There also is not a lot of unity in the buildings or signage.
Chrm. Laurent acknowledged that there have been several previous committees set
up for the purpose of improving the downtown area, but he feels -this time the
effort is different. He said that because of the development of on the west end,
along CR17 and the Racetrack, there is an even greater need to create a pleasant
shopping area.
�~ Downtown Committee
June 26, 1984
Page 2 �--
He said the Committee believes if they don't create a pleasant environment,
the traffic will not stop in Shakopee. He added that they learned from the
previous committees that it is a long tern. project. They have now come further
in their research than any of the previous committees. He said there is a feel-
ing that they are all in it together.
The committee undertook an inventory and site analysis of the downtown businesses,
many of which have been there for over 20 years. Many own the businesses they
operate, over half had plans to improve their buildings, and almost all are com-
mitted to remaining in downtown Shakopee. These arc very :strong points for
Shakopee. Other strong points are the location of a major medical facility
and City and County offices. The consultant determined what kind of marketing
needs exist.
Based on the gathered information, the consultant come up with concept plans for
the Committee's reviewal. After much deliberation, the Committee picked Plan
B1 revised. Chrm. Laurent pointed out the identified areas of housing, insti-
tutions, retail core and public lands on the exhibit. He ,�,id that since it
became a consensus to retain the north side of lst Ave. as a vital part of the
downtown area, a mini by-pass was created to skirt lst Ave. Because of this,
main street is planned to have 2 lanes, rather than 4, which will allow diagonal
parking and sidewalk extensions at intersections. Chan, Laurent emphasized that
this is a concept plan, and the boundaries of areas can hc: ,3tretched a little.
But at least now when a developer comes to town, he can be directed to certain
areas, He added they will be improving 2nd Ave. He :.paid -they realize some of
the properties dowtown will best improve by being taken down, and to that Find
they have developed an acquisition plan. They have the capacity for assimilat-
ing lard to encourage development. They have set up urban design standards,
whereby there will be less flexibility than in the past, but hopefully.more unity.
They also have a rehabilitation loan program set up. They are encouraging the
activity of the Local Development Corp.
Chrm. Laurent detailed the costs of the redevelopment project. The mini by-pass,
addition of one lane on the bridge and changing the main intersection will be
about $3L million. The downtown streetscapes with pedestrian improvements, street
lighting and improvements in the parking lots will be about $4 million.. Burying
utility lines and riverfront improvements are osl'Jmated -to be about $800,000.
public cost for housing development is estimated to be $580,000.
behabilitation loans, $2 million. Total estim - d co:zt is $11 million.
The Committee also identified some sources of funding, such as tax increment
money, transportation funding, parks grants and special assessments. Chrm.
Laurent elaborated on the assessment source. He Said the streetscape improvements,
estimated to be about $4 million, will be taking place right outside of store
fronts. The committee is recommending to City Council that those property owners
who will benefit from the improvements pay 25J of the cost of the improvements.
He mentioned the handout available to help figure out how that would affect
downtown property owners. Although the improvements to the downtown area benefit
the City at large, the property owners are also going to benefit. There will
be about a $11 million benefit for a $1 million investment. He mentioned other
cities and areas that have successfully gone through this type of redevelopment.
It is their belief that the only real mistake would. be to do nothing.
Bill Wermerskirchen said he has watched .several previous; committees die when it
came to the point where the business people pay a large portion of the improve-
ment. He thinks we are at a point where if they don't do anything now, it will
never happen. You have to think about what you are getting for the assessment.
He believes it is a good investment. You will be seeing something tangible right
outside your Tont door.
Downtown Committee
June 26, 1984
Page 3
Terry Link commented on the traffic and how it negatively affects his business
on the north side of 1st Ave. He said it takes a lot of time away from his
business just to negotiate the street.
Dan Steil said he has worked with people who know that beautificatial alone
is not going to do anything for a business. He is always interested in the
bottom line -- to bring economic viability to the downtown. It is going to
cost the downtown businesses to create a better downtown. They want to create
a district that will bring people downtown and all of the town people can be
proud of.
Steve Clay said he just wants to express the sense of urgency. With the race-
track traffic the east side of Shakopee could develop rapidly and the downtown
could deteriorate just as rapidly if nothing is done now.
Chrm. Laurent opened the meeting to questions and comments from the audience.
Craig Mertz stated he is an attorney represc;nUng Drembilla and 1st Avenue Pet
Hospital. He said they are not in opposition to the project, but they have some
concern. The Brambilla complex is on the demol_i t_i_on list. IIS_; said they would
hope the mini by-pass does not just slice off the car lot and leave the building
because that would effectively destroy the business.
Mr. Mertz said that Brambilla's and the Pet Hospital would be looking for mean-
ingful relocation assistance and fair compensation. He also asked to what ex-
tent was the mini by-pass dependent upon State funding.
Chrm. Laurent said they feel fairly confident that the State will participate
to some extent on the intersection or the bridge or both, but they are not count-
ing on the State for all the funding. The Comm. Develop. Di. -r, added that all
the acquisition would be pursuant to the Uniform Acquisition Law so a fair price
would be given for the property. She said because Hwy. 169 is a through highway,
they also have to have the Highway Dept.'s support. If the City Council approves
this plan, they will begin working in earnest with the Highwmay Dept. Ken Anderson,
of Westwood Planning & Engineering, will be doing further studies defining what
needs to be done. She guessed it would be a minimum of 5 years before the mini
by-pass comes to place, so people will have many years to continue their busi-
nesses and look for relocation possibilities. She said the acquisition plans
are for the taking of the whole south half of the Brambilla lot.
Dick Mertz expressed his concern about the by-pass going through the back of
all the blighted buildings. Chrm. Laurent responded that there will be some trees
and landscaping done in that area. They will also be providing a lot of incen-
tives to that particular block for improvements. Terry Link said he would put
money into his building if there was a by-pass. Joe Topic said he also plans
improvements to the rear of the Antique store. Don Martin said one of the reasons
the north side has been deteriorating all these years is because it is so_ separated_
from the rest of the downtown by the traffic, and the businesses have a hard time
making a go of it. He added that one of the first ideas the Committee had was
the elimination of all of the north side of 1st Ave. One of the problems they
encountered was that the Opera House building ..is listed on the National Historic
Record. Chrm. Laurent said that as a last resort for buildings that did not
improve, there would be acquisition.
Downtown Committee
June 26, 1984 °
Page 4
Mona Strunk said she has a home on 3rd and Ho_lmer, which i:; zoned commercial,
and she wondered if she could sell her home. Chrm. Laurent replied that itis
right on the edge of the retail core, but the line could fluctuate a little.
He said the rules governing her home are already dictated by zoning, and their
plan would do nothing to change her property.
J_ -iry ' `trey 'tha:
retail core will draw from. He said other shopping areas draw from many miles
away, and start their improvements 20 miles from the location, like CR42 to
Burnsville Center. He said his business draw, from a much larger area than
some downtown businesses. He said advertisingcoos quite -. bit. He has been
in this location for 5 years, and 95% of their .�U:,i ness i:-, from people who drive by
it or are told by someone. He is concerned that the by-pass will also take
away customers from downtown, along with the trucks.
Chrm. Laurent responded that the consultant said the majority of the traffic
is just going through the town. But fie agreed it as a gamble to try to get more
people downtown to a pleasant area to park and walk aro wri.
Mr. Schroers said something hlas to he dons 1:11r, -,. t; jil i n the north side
to make them more attractive. He thinks they : ho ;:L,i have all been torn down.
He said there has to be a big incentive -to make pi.:op, e :_,top. He said you haven't
mentioned how many towns have died because of by-pa:�-.e;:. He agrees we have to
do something, but he thinks this by-pass just makes it easier for people to go
to the west end of town.
Dan Steil described their plan for access points and creating a draw for down-
town with signage and eye-catching themes. The aurvey :showed that 98o of all
the vehicles did not or could not slow down in this area. They realize they
need to capture some of that traffic and U -.t it into downt.o,in where it is compact
and pleasant and pedestrians can walk and enjoy themselves. They realize it is
a trade-off.
Mr. Schroers said that about 75% of their business is outside the City limits.
Terry Link said he has had his shop for 4 years and he still has people coming
in and saying they didn't even know he was there, because they were too busy
watching the traffic, etc. on that block. He acknowledged that Mr. Share had
a great plus with his off-street parking.
Chrm. Laurent recessed the meeting for a break at 8:23 p.m.
The meeting reconvened at 8:40 p.m., with a slide pre2entation by the ICC high-
lighting the merits of locating businesses and industries in Shakopee.
Paul Wermerskirchen said it is the charge of the ICC to improve the business
and industrial climate of the City. They have an annual Industry Day which
invites industrial and commercial firms to a presentation in ShakQpee. They
have also organized a visiting program of the industries presently existing in
^Shaken }}o��pee, wherein members
i� of City
n Counncil,, ICC, Planning Commission and the
.1,n•it'✓L-.r vi vVl�laial�1�V k-Z21i rt1 U11 V VIIIA 11 1C. Q llV U�l+i �&I X 11 ���V�lti��1. 11:) Qls,.l, L— , LV 11a,-Blle
any problems. He said they would like to know from the public any good ideas
for promoting Shakopee. He praised the Downtown Committee for the tremendous
amount of work they have done.
Chrm. Laurent suggested the Local Development Corp. may want to put together
a similar slide presentation of just the Central Business District.
Downtown Committee
June 26, 1984
Page 6
C/ OL
of it. He said the City cannot respond adequately to developors unless it has
identified areas of preferred development. He recounted how the City worked to
try to get the Jaycees to locate their headquarters in Shakopee. Ultimately,
the City could not compete against the incentives offered by Burnsville, but if
the City hadn't identified some parcels that might be available and suitable
the City wouldn't even be in contention.
The City Admr. spoke of current negotiations taking place to try to locate a
building for the Scott -Carver Economic Council in Shakop(:c. Because of the
existence of this plan, City staff was able to take numerous sites and list the
pros and cons and help the businessmen downtown. He said the public part of
decision-making is a long, involved process and coo nlinatinn is needed.
The City Admr. also pointed out the youth and business -ownership represented on
this Downtown Committee.
Chrm. Laurent said all of City staff have done a super job in working with this
Committee. He added that he didn't want to down -play the important role previous
committees for the downtown have played. He said they identified problems and
outlined the complexities involved.
Karen Lebens, 207 Atwood, said she lives upstairs of A Ari-.hur Interiors, which
is noted for public acquisition. She asked about acquisition plans for the Levee
project. The City Admr. explained that it is partially acquired.
Ms. Lebens asked why the City would want to buy -that building and throw out the
5 living quarters that are in there now, and put up housing for seniors located
so close to the railroad tracks, a location which was already turned down in
the past. Chrm. Laurent said it was hard to find a whole block that was vacant
and also that the previous senior housing project was under FHA rules that were
stricter. Ms. Lebens replied that she would think putting the elderly next to
the railroad tracks would be as hazardous as crossing 1st Ave. She would think
that retail and commercial would be a more appropriate use there. Chrm. Laurent
responded that they want to keep the re tail area condensed in a centralized area
where people can park their cars and get out and walk.
Ms. Lebens also commented that she didn't see much room for new businesses, as
most of the area is already developed. She asked about the feasibility of re-
moving any of the businesses if a new business, such as a hotel, wanted to de-
velop downtown. Chrm. Laurent said they want to identify areas of development,
and if some buildings had to come out, it would be for the good of the over-all
plan.
Ms. Dineen commented that the location for housing is good because it is within
walking distance for groceries, bank, churches and hospital.
Ms. Lebens asked about Plans A and C and B before it was revised. Steve Clay
suggested she check with City Hall to see the plans. He said they mostly dealt
with different ways of routing traffic, without changing much in the retail area.
Dan Steil said basically Plan A kept the traffic on 1st Ave., and Plan C involved
cloverleaves, which were deemed too expensive.
Grace Poon said they have just moved their Family Chow Main restaurant to 1st
Ave., and she is wondering if they might have to be re -located again before they
move in. Chrm. Laurent said that at the time the plan was drawn, that location
was vacant. Now, he said they are doing exactly what vie want -- to re -build and
become a viable part of downtown. Consultant Ken Anderson said he is working on
the geometries, but it appears they will not need that property for the by-pass.
Downtown Committee
June 26, 1984
Page 7
' CL
Ms. Lebens asked about the revitalization of 2nd Ave. Chrm. Laurent stated that
unfortunately, they cannot move the railroad so it will just have to be lived
with. 2nd Ave. is slated to have the same type of street improvements with side-
walks and plantings, etc., with special attention to the railroad tracks. The
consultant -has given them several ideas for minimizl_ng the hazards of the cros-
sings. The railroad has said they don't plan to increase the number of trips.
Dan Steil emphasized thatthis is just a plan and the reason for this meeting is
to gain input from the people living and working in the area. The plan is not
cast in concrete, and they intend to be flexible. It is everyone's project.
Gene Pearson asked about the entrances to downtown from Iiwy. 169. Ken Anderson,.
traffic engineer for Westwood Planning & Engineering, said that Holmes Street
will not go through to Hwy. 169. A lot of that traffic will be on Fuller. He
said they are working on the geometrics now and at this time there are 3 possible
basic alternatives at the bridge. He mentioned the changes that could be made.
He said the real problem is matching grades to the bridge and down to the recre-
ational area. He said there will probably be a controlled intersection at
Spencer and Sommerville.
Craig Mertz asked about the proposed building located in the public sector.
The Committee said they are open to any suggestions.
Terry Forbord stated he works downtown, and he wants to stress that time is of
the essence. He said the financial estimates haven't taken into account infla-
tion, which could increase the costs quite a bit. He is concerned with the
amount of development taking place in the surrounding areas. Isn't there a way
to speed things up.
Chrm. Laurent replied that believe it or not, they are going full speed ahead.
He said the number of agencies that have to bel contacted just on the bridge alone
is incredible. It is a major engineering project that even involves the Coast
Guard. This Committee agrees they want it done yesterday. He added there is a
lot of competition out there, and they would rather see something outside of
downtown, but still in Shakopee, rather than outside the community altogether.
Steve Clay said if the areas along CR17 were not rezoned to less than 5 acres,
that could help the downtown. He suggested people talk to the City Council.
Gene Pearson asked about any legal problems with abandoning the two parking lots
on the north side. The City Admr. answered that because the parking lots were
created with assessments, those spaces eliminated will have to be replaced
elsewhere. Steve Clay said the use of diagonal parking creates 65% more spaces.
The owner of Betty Lou's asked about diagonal parking on the side streets, as
Lewis used to be diagonal parking. She also asked if they would be tearing up
the whole downtown area at one time for these improvements. Chrm. Laurent said
they didn't know the time table yet. She asked if they would be able to get
diagonal parking, widened sidewalks and narrowed streets at the same time. She
also.asked about maintenance costs to the property owners for the trees and
benches. Chrm. Laurent said the Committee opted to put in more durable fixtures
at a higher cost now which will mean less maintenance in the years to come.
Jeff Man they asked if any thought had been given to the railroad depot. Dan Steil
said they had been contacted by someone who wanted to make the depot into a resi-
dence for himself. The Planning Commission basically felt they didn't want that
structure to be residential so close to the tracks. They would like to use the
depot as a benefit to downtown. Chrm. Laurent said the railroad will not donate
it to Shakopee.
Downtown Committee
June 26, 1984
Page 8
f CL
Me. Lebens said it is such a contradiction to have the depot commercial in a
housing area and not allow their housing in a retail area. She wondered why
her input had not been soufht earlier. Chrm. Laurent said the Committee has
been working on this for 31F years, and all the meetings are public. They have
been presenting their ideas and progress to various City groups during that
time. The Comm. Develop. Dir, encouraged Ms. Lebens and everyone else to follow
these hearings. She gave the tentative schedule for the presentations to the
ICC, Planning Commission and City Council.
Chrm. Lament said he hopes for support from everyone. He also said their
Committee is looking for additional members.
Meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
Jeanne Andre
Community Development Director
Diane S. Beuch
Recording Secretary
TO: Downtown Community
FROM: Shakopee Ad Hoc Downtown Committee
RE: Special Assessments for Downtown Streetscape Improvements
DATE: June 2.6, 1984
The Downtown Committee has spent the past: few years
developing a Downtown Concept Plan and laihtat ion Program.
A total of about $11 million of improvements arc proposed in
this program. One element of the Man involves streetscape
improvements that include new curbs, Pavement, sidewalks,
pedestrian improvements, landscaping, tree crates and guards,
plaza, bus shelters, kiosks and street lighting for an area
bounded by 1st and 3rd Avenues, Atwoo(l and Somm(,rville. This
area will receive the initial hudgetecl improvements, but further
improvements could occur later where the initial project is
successfully completed.
The cost of these st-reet_>cape improvements is estimated at
this time to be approx-imately $4 million. Under the financial
plan proposed by the Comm-ittee, 25>, or appro.xirnately $1 million
would be assessed, with the rest paid by the City from sources
such as tax .increment districts. if tho City Council approves
this plan, an improvement district will need to he established
and an assessment policy adopted. However to illustrate the
impact of our proposal on downtown property owners the Downtown
Committee has established a hypothetical- improvement district
_and
foot of land area. It is assumed that any policy would create
assessments in the ra-n_c�Q- of $ 1
This assessment would total $9C,27 +: r a ,,.arc:el 60' x142' .
if this assessment is spread over a .10 year p( riod at an annual
interest rate of 10%, the following r!ayrnent scn—dule would be
generated:
Year PavWent (Pr-i.)ci lea 1 and Interest)
1 $2,558.
2 1_, 8')29.
3 1,733.
4 1,637.
5 1,540.
6 1,444.
- - 1.,348.
8 1,252.
9 1,155.
10 $1,059.
This schedule is provided as an illustration, and needs
to be adjusted for various size parcels. We hope it gives you
a good idea of what the estimated total of $1.1 million dollars
in total improvements will cost you for your. collective $1
million investment.
MEMO TO:
John K.
Anderson,
City Admin.
FROM:
Jeanne
Andre, HRA
Director
RE: - Sale of Land in Block 29
City of Shakopee
DATE: July 13, 1984
INTRODUCTION
(�, 1;:;c' ?'yP
Many irregular shaped parcels exist in Block 29, City of
Shakopee, due to the fact that,until recently, the rail right-of-
way (R -O -W) divided this block. After the City acquired the
R -O -W, discussion was initiated with Joe Topic, owner of most
Lv 'in -chis block, to see it he wanted to purchase
rliP..r`nr�Pr-nf-h.l�- 1iL6o 5-P�'J1.Ziirj-i'i'i«'-��2c
to outline the most recent discussion with Mr. Topic.
BACKGROUND
The City Attorney raised the issue of sale of land to Mr.
Topic after initiating registration (torrencing) of the land
the City owns in this block and an adjoining block. He determined
that land to be sold to Mr. Topic should be excluded from the regis-
tration proceedings. When the sale was discussed with Mr. Topic,
he determined that he isn't interested in paying the market price
(established in appraisal ordered by Northwestern Bell) because
he has no plans to construct a structure on this parcel. His main
interest is that the parcel should be improved to look better and
be more suitable for parking.
Julius Coller, Bo Spurrier, Joe Topic and I met on July 10,
1984, to discuss this issue. Two alternatives were put forward:
1] If a storm sewer easement is put through this block,
Mr. Topic would be agreeable to purchasing this parcel,
if the existance of the easement brings the price to
$2,500 or below. Since he is not planning to build on
the parcel, the easement would not be detrimental to
his plans.
2] If the City continues to own the land, Mr. Topic would
like to cooperate with the City to make improvements
jointly on his own and the City land. Due to the shape
of the parcels, it wouldn't make sense for either party
to pla-iseparateimprovements. Such improvements could be
accomplished cooperatively when and if streetscape
improvements are made.
The concensus of the City staff at the July 10th meeting
was that storm sewer improvements through Lots 4 and 5 of Block
29 would be disruptive to most types of development possible there,
especially since there is a 150 foot setback requirement from the
adjacent R-3 (mid -density residential) zone. It is recommended
that a decision on the use of the abandoned R -O -W for storm sewer
purposes should be delayed until a development is proposed. Then,
the decision on whether to provide an easement for the storm sewer
will be based on how the easement will impact the quality of the
site plan for that development. Mr. Topic has agreed to this plan,
possibly purchasing land with an easement in the future, or
cooperating with the City to improve the land each owns with pave-
ment and landscaping.
Based on the above described concensus, the City Attorney
recommends proceeding with the registration of the entire parcel
now, which will still allow for a possible sale in the future,
or maintaining the status quo.
REQUESTED ACTION
Direct the City Attorney to proceed with the registration of.
all City owned land in Block 29 of the City of Shakopee.
JA/bn
A7,
u` •C.
Ul
M "0. 'ja
1 cn � D t3 �''' .-�•tv �� o�
Vii, az v
6.1.1/x°
,�'� .7 �. °° c.%•�f�'.� Ys„%p ,, � '`.y•.,/ / ® {Qin. �1 `®
IN
U t CT1 ��. � 1, �� `•:;, tai a, ee
1-0
CO y '
•c'
.40 ` i
/4 - \p
�� CA \ Z.'h
r i �' ..r o�
PS
N
Ri
IN
cl
m
m
'U
c>
m
G
O Ul
C-) iri
C)
o
N U
A
o Ln
v ..
m
m c�
h
A
rtt
MEMORDANUM
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administpjtor
FROM: H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Deerview Acres Road Repairs _
DATE: July 13, 1984 ^
INTRODUCTION:
Norton Drive a public improvement project, contstructed in 1979,
began to fail in dramatic fashion in late March and early April,
1984.
The City Staff had Braun Engineering Testing evaluate the roadway
and report on possible remedy. Attached is the report prepared
by Braun.
The report recommends draining a 325 foot section. Unfortunately
that section is 775 feet from a drainage way where the flow could
be discharged. An estimate of the drainage related items is attached.
After the drainage work is complete the subgrade must dry out.
The drying process will take six (6) months.
The best construction schedule would be to install the drain tile
in 1984, maintain a gravel road and then pave the road in 1985.
Subgrade work and paving should cost an additional $12,000. bringing
the total cost to approximately $27,000.
Unresolved is the matter of the rehabilitation policy and whether
a 375 foot section is maintenance or rehabilitation if Council
determines it is rehabilitation, only 20% of 25% or 5% of the cost
could be assessed given the credit for unused life (16/20 of the
assessed cost would be credit). If assessed the amount assessed
would be a maximum of $229 per lot. If the work is rehabilitation,
Staff must bring back a resolution ordering a public hearing.
If the work is maintenance, Council should direct Staff to prepare
a contract or change order for the draintile installation. This
work can be undertaken with Day Labor if the costs are reasonable.
The City relocated a watermain for the Huber comfort station this
way.
Staff can prepare the specs to investigate a Day Labor contract,
change order or formal bid and have an action item ready for the
next Council meeting.
ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Motion directiing Staff to prepare specifications for draintile
installation and attempt to obtain quotes or negotiate a price
for the draintile installation for the Norton Drive.
2. Motion directing Staff to undertake the repair of Norton Drive
F��
DEERVIEW DRAINTILE
Materials
Ll�
1. Pipelaying Crew; Backhoe, Loader,
Foreman, 2 PipeIayers
(4 Days @ $250.00 Hr.) $8,000.00
2. 2 Laborers - Wrap pipe with Fabric
(4Hrs-_f-P-$51a-00Hr. ) 200.00
Sub Total $8,emm.00
Total $13,810.00
10% Contingency 1,381.00
Total $15,191.00
Unit
nit
No.
Description
Unit
Quantity
Price
Totals
1.
6" Perf. PVC
L.F.
110z
$1~60
$1,760.00
2.
2' Wide Fabric
S.Y.
250
1.00
250.00
3.
Pea Rock
Ton
425
7.55
3,200.00
4.
Class 5 driveway
Ton
10
10.00
100.00
Restoration
5.
Seed Restoration
L.S.
1
250.00
250.00
Sub Total
$5,610.00
Ll�
1. Pipelaying Crew; Backhoe, Loader,
Foreman, 2 PipeIayers
(4 Days @ $250.00 Hr.) $8,000.00
2. 2 Laborers - Wrap pipe with Fabric
(4Hrs-_f-P-$51a-00Hr. ) 200.00
Sub Total $8,emm.00
Total $13,810.00
10% Contingency 1,381.00
Total $15,191.00
84-128
City of Shakopee -2- April 18, 1984
The subgrade soils (fine silty clayey sands) are considered to be
highly frost susceptible. It is our opinion that the soils
observed fall into U.S. Corps of Engineers category of F4 (high
susceptible to frost heave and/or weakening as a result of frost
melting).
A hand level was used to determine the depth of the ditch below
street grade near the severely rutted area. The ditch on the
north side of this street was approximately 30 inches deep and
the south ditch approximately 15 inches deep. Standing water was
noted in the south ditch.
ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
It is our opinion that the break up of the pavement cross-section
was caused by ice lenses building up in the subgrade soils. The
ice lenses likely heaved the pavement and weakened the subgrade
soils. When the frost went out of the subgrade traffic loadings
failed the upper portions of the embankment.
It is our opinion that the major causes of the pavement failure
are frost susceptible subgrade soils, poor drainage away from the
embankments, and a relatively thin pavement cross-section for the
subgrade soils.
As was discussed during our meeting on the site we recommend that
draintile be placed on the south side of the street to pickup the
ground and surface water from the south. The draintile should
be kept as deep as possible to provide adequate drainage of the
embankment. We recommend that the perforated draintile be
wrapped with fabric and the tile covered with a minimum of 6
inches of gravel. The remainder of the trench should be filled
with a clean sand.
We also recommend a subcut of the street (approximately 2 feet
deep) to remove the contaminated Class 5 and disturbed subgrade
soils. We recommend that a relatively low strength fabric be
placed at the 2 -foot depth and, if possible, draped into the
draintile trench. The replacement soils should be a clean sand.
The sand should be placed such that it creates a natural drainage
channel from under the pavement into the draintile trench.
We recommend that after installation of the draintile, subcutting
of the street, and backfilling, a 6 -inch cap of clay soil be
w
84-128
City of Shakopee
-3-
April 18, 1984
placed in the invert of the ditch to channel surface water away
from the draintile system.
GENERAL
Our analysis and recommendations are based on the soils observed
and our hand auger probes. Variations may occur between these
probes, the nature and extent of which may not become evident
until construction. If variations are encountered, it will be
necessary to make a re-evaluation of the recommendations of this
report after performing on-site observations during the construc-
tion and noting the characteristics of any variations. Such
variations may result in additional costs and it Is suggested
that a contingency be provided for this purpose.
If there are any questions or if further information or testing
is required, please contact us at your convenience.
Very truly yours,
BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC.
M. Samuelson
Z.ames
enior Engineering Assistant
C. G. Kruse, P.E.
Vice President - Engineering
JMS/CGK:bmb
The content of this report and supporting documents are for the exclusive use of the addressee. In the absence of our prior written approval
we make no representation and assume no responsibility to any other parties regarding such content.
114
HRAU11'
ENGINEERING TESTING
M E M___0 _R A N_D U M
TO: John '. Anderson, City Administ ator
�f
FROM: H.R. ;,purrier, City Enginee 'J
RE: JEJ Dvainage of Former Chicago, Milw kee,
St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Right -o -Way
DATE: July 6, 1984
Introduction:
Attached is P,3rtial Estimate No. 1 for the above referenced
project.
Background:
-4s Me 611SC SS ,5d car22, r", t'i're F2da gcfarrCZg— (if 6" dr-aii7 Cite Gras
creas�u by 5E, L.Y. . , TaisiTIB t'nc cast of tyle project by $838.VY0.
This was offset by the decreased length of 18" RCP, 48 L.F. _
$1,138.00. The net result is a reduciton of $300.00.
The Contractc r has reviewed this estimate.
Recommendatic n:
Pay Estimate Voucher No. -1 as indicated.
Action Reque!>ted:
Motion to authorize the payment of Partial Estimate No. 1
to S.M. Hentges and Sons, 1523 West 3rd Avenue, Shakopee, MN
55379, in tre amount of $32,321.25 for the JEJ Drainage Project
No. 1984-3.
HRS:cah
Attachment
4
M E M___0 _R A N_D U M
TO: John '. Anderson, City Administ ator
�f
FROM: H.R. ;,purrier, City Enginee 'J
RE: JEJ Dvainage of Former Chicago, Milw kee,
St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Right -o -Way
DATE: July 6, 1984
Introduction:
Attached is P,3rtial Estimate No. 1 for the above referenced
project.
Background:
-4s Me 611SC SS ,5d car22, r", t'i're F2da gcfarrCZg— (if 6" dr-aii7 Cite Gras
creas�u by 5E, L.Y. . , TaisiTIB t'nc cast of tyle project by $838.VY0.
This was offset by the decreased length of 18" RCP, 48 L.F. _
$1,138.00. The net result is a reduciton of $300.00.
The Contractc r has reviewed this estimate.
Recommendatic n:
Pay Estimate Voucher No. -1 as indicated.
Action Reque!>ted:
Motion to authorize the payment of Partial Estimate No. 1
to S.M. Hentges and Sons, 1523 West 3rd Avenue, Shakopee, MN
55379, in tre amount of $32,321.25 for the JEJ Drainage Project
No. 1984-3.
HRS:cah
Attachment
s-
PAR'.I'IAh i?; 1h1,1'i'1; V0IJf2J ,:I;
Contract No. 1984-3Partial Estimate
V«riche.r M). 1� 1'frr•it)(I
30, 1984
_June
TO:
Contractor S.M. Hentges
& Sons
^_
_
Address 1523 West
3rd
Avenue, Shakopee., _MN
_55379
Project Description JEJ Drainage
1.
Original Contract Amount
45,656.13
2.
Change Order No. ---
'T'hru
Iti.). --- _
_0_
_
3.
Total Funds Encumbered
;,
45,656.13
4.
Value of Work Completed
$
34,022.36
__V..____._...
Vrr,l
iv • c, f' Work Itemaininiz
5.
5 Percent Rei.ain, r;,,
;;
1,701.11
13,334.88
_
6. Previous Payments $ -0-
Percent Complete
7. Deductions or Charges $ -0_
71%
8. Total $ 1,701.11
Payment Due (Line 4 - Line 8) $ 32,321.25
CER'T1FICATE OF PAYME'NT
(I, We) hereby agree that the quantity and value of work ::hover, herein is a fair
estimate of the work completed to date.
t
CONTRACTOR: ` j j a `• '�'�
BY:
TITLE :
P�11'130 D - CIT OF SI AKOPEL:
W-ircer
VDt
City Administrator Bute
mg
w
,�
Z
0
Vl
I�
A
�
-F
�
-
-
� fig
�
;N
�
��
�
n
to
>
3
\13
0
IRS
> 2.
0
CL
mg
w
,�
Z
0
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administr for
r
FROM: H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer r
RE: Street Lighting on County Road 17
DATE: July 13, 1984
Introduction:
I am in receipt of a letter from Mr. Donald E. Bunge, 2281
Norton Drive, Shakopee, Minnesota, regarding the above cap-
tioned matter.
Mr. Bunge lives in Dearview Acres and requests a light at the
intersection of Norton Drive and County Road 17.
It has been the City policy to refer these requests to Scott
County to determine whether a warrant exists for the lighting
when such a request involves a County road.
It is my recommendation that this matter be referred to Scott
County to determine whether a warrant exists for street lighting
at the intersection of Norton Drive and County Road 17.
Action Requested:
Direct appropriate City Staff to refer a request for street
lighting at County Road 17 and Norton Drive to the Scott County
Engineer for review to determine whether a warrant exists.
HRS:cah
TO: John Anderson ..k -fit 19 4
FROM: Lou Van ,Hout
RE: Street Light Request from Don Bunge
DATE: July 5, 1984
Mr. Bunge stopped in the office today to request a security light be installed
at a street intersection. I advised him that it was not our policy to light public
streets with security lighting and that he should petition for a street light at
that location.
He then signed the attached note as a request for a street light.
My opinion is that a street light at the intersection of County Road 17 and
Norton Drive is a good idea. If the Council desires a street light at that
location we could install one under the standard arrangement of the City of
Shakopee paying for the installation and SPDC taking the operating costs.
The installation cost is estimated to be $100.00.
q �
21TAY
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator �, 7
FROM: H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer C
RE: Shakopee Racetrack
Offsite Roadway Improvement
DATE: July 13, 1984
Introduction:
Attached is a statement from Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. for
work on the above referenced project.
Background:
The attached statement covers work performed under the contract
approved in the meeting July 10th. Now that the City is under
contract with Barton-Aschman it is appropriate to pay this
statement.
Action Requested:
Motion to authorize payment to Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
in the amount of $47,038.00 for work on the Shakopee Racetrack
Offsite Improvements.
HRS:cah
Attachment
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
820 Davis Street
P.O. Box 1381
Evanston, Illinois 60204-1381 1nvr71,;e Number 30210
312-491-1000
June 22, 1984
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Attention: Mr. H.R. Spurrier
City Engineer
Progress billing for professional services rendered from project
initiation through June 15, 1984 in connection with roadway
design in the City of Shakopee.
TH 101 $ 23,633.00 J
12th Ave. 3,384.00
NJS Collection 11,468.00
CR 83 4,692.00
4th Ave. 3,861.00
AMOUNT DUE $ 47,038.00
INV
TIM, w,n•r-"-.s..-,.n..M•_-,....�,�».,..r.or._..e.,---•.- _ _ ._'ott".`�`, .,rta.+'"sa",h'3
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Barry A. Stock, Adm. Aide/Transit Coor. U'
RE: Authorize Advertisement of Van Pool Request For Proposals
DATE: July 13, 1984
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Attached is the transit schedule of important dates. Due to the
tight time restrictions regarding the vanpool request for proposals
(RFP'S), staff is requesting that Council authorize the advertise-
ment of the Notice of Request for Proposals in the Shakopee Valley
News on August 1 and August 8, 1984. This advertisement would
appear prior to the review of the van pool RFP specifications by
Council.
While this is not a common city practice, it would give potential
providers additional time to prepare some general information for
their proposals prior to the actual availability of the RFP specifi-
cations which will be August 8, 1984 pending their approval from
Council on August 7, 1984.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Authorize staff to advertise the Van Pool Notice of Request
for Proposals.
2. Do not authorize staff to advertise the Van Pool Notice of
Request for Proposals until after the RFP specifications
have been reviewed by Council.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends alternative #1.
ACTION REQUESTED
Move to authorize the appropriate city official to advertise
the Van Pool Notice of Request for Proposals.
TRANSIT SCHEDULE OF IMPORTANT DATES
July 19 - Energy and Transportation Meeting
July 30 - Dial -A -Ride Bid Opening 10:30 a.m.
Aug. 1 - Special Energy and Transportation Committee Meeting -
7:30 p.m.
Recommend to City Council approval of best dial -a -ride
bid
Recommend to City Council to approve Van Pool Request
for Proposal Specifications
Aug. 7 - City Council awards dial -a -ride contract to best bidder.
City Council approves van pool request for proposal
specifications and authorizes staff to obtain RFD's
Aug. 13 - Press Conference 9:00 a.m.
Aug. 16 - Van Pool RFP submission deadline
Energy and Transportation Committee Meeting
Recommend to City Council approval of Van Pool provider
Aug. 21 - City Council awards Van Pool contract
Aug. 23 - Van Pool organizational meeting
W
t.J
�T
V
1 JJJJ V
�
V JJJJ JJ`�J
JJ
J
'`®
-0o
JJ
r
rl
N
N
N
N
mm00wwww M,CC
ry
ry
N
0100
v
u
u
u
u
v
u
a
r
r
rrrr r -r
�
a
•
w
•
a
\ \ \ \ \ a
•
\
•
\\ a \ \ \ \ \
\ \
IAJ
\
\
\ \
A. N. \ t\ A
A
Z h-
11 A
�D
- J O O 7 'l 7
'-7
1 7 7 7 7 7 7 J
O
"7
7
k
O
a
lil
O
v
�
•c
r.
U
Y'
'7
♦
V
t
•
•
J
•
•O �O •O •O •O •O 1Q •O •O
A A
♦
P
•
! 6"1
•OO
•
`
UI
M
♦
r
O
•
N
j•
N N N MN N N N N I
N N
♦
N
a
'M
I M M
• ,
d'
Wr
r
•
•
OOOOOU
•
O
•
000Oi0007 O
:7O
•
O
•
i0
`OO
•
MMMMMM
•
M
•
1.1M Nt N1 M1 MMMM
MM
•
M
•
�M
MM (
♦ i
O`
A
d
•
T
N
aPD'7'TP
•
0•
■
PPCT O.'P PP DI a,,
0.7`
•
P
0,
'
r
a
r
•
Ln
•
rrrr��
•
r
•
rr.-rr err
rr
♦
r
•
�r I
t
i
•
10
•
J
�'N
z
r
.p
O O G O O p
N
N N J r N M r N N
P P
N
N N
•
O O 00 O O
P
r .p r N r r r �O r
r A
O
N
O
•O
0 0 0 0 0 0
N
N N J r N M r N M
P P
M
N
N N
z
J
M
0 0 0 0 0 0
J
d V dMMMJrIt
rr
10
.O
1
1
I t1 1 t 1
1
9 1 1 1 i l t 1 1
F
O
O
r N r N r N
N
d O O N N N N N N
O O
O
O
O O
z
r
rrrr•-r
r
rr r M M M M MM
MM
r
M
MP
N
M
•0 .0 •0 .0 .0 .0
N
N N N N (v N N N N
M M
N
N
pn
U
r
r
A A M M N u'
r
r r r r r r r r
f! O
r
r
I
O
O
MM VS Ltd 1/ 111
O
OOOO OOO oO
r N
O
O
00
aaan_aa
•
t.l 1.1 41 1.1 LI
000000
ir Z t r X Ik cr
••
W
z
F- 1.; 1- W I- Li
►- H
cr
H
O
7 W 2 w Z LJ
.a M 66 •a as •a
N (n
N •
VI
1, i ll U l L- I. la_
`+ >
•e
w LL
r-
W
ti F i
•• e••♦
V) N
cn Z
Q-
U
s.
m cr
•
in C,
..
.�
azczaz
t-
2z 7zz2p
D0
r
Du
c
>
a. W Cl Ll n L, ,
Q
r. H •-i ..V)
N
2
to
U
tY
O c L)
s
4044Qa
►+
•�
i1
N
Li
i-.4 -a r- x
_
NNNZS SZSf
.e•a
N
!
eD
1.)
iJ
N
N n V)
W
W W W
LI
Z
N
p
.r
1, i (D -, I V) 41 L9
uFr
H F-1 • • • • •
J J
J J
J
77fr ZfYZ
4
JJJ4 Qda c a
WW
J
•
w0
s
d
LL.
L) .r w .: W ti
IL
a. d 4 H •-I •-1 raw►+
7 .l
d
CD
3 O
Ll
IN
O
r- b.
fr
IL& IL 77mm7n
Qa
a.
0
w2
r-
n
7a 7a a
M
»Dd 00,700
Kn'
D
J
a U
a
CL r a
N
N N N W Vi 1,J W L) L^
tC
L'.
H
N
Vr
U
Y>> )• Y Y ). Y>
Ll
z
Y Y Y Y Y Y
J J J J J J J J J
Of
.+
7z7z7T
J
llaf-a Mc - m as
u
aaa a<a
a
can as o_caa as
z
z
zz
L)
♦
z
a
N y .n N N N N N 49
V)
\
f1) N
W
W
O
• • • • • •
N
fY
fY X
Z
'!
U
WLl
W
2
W W
U
O
Q Q •I .r a s
a a Q c 4 t 4 Q Q
2fY
O
O
O O
n'
T
/.-
7 9 7 7 P.
f1
Q w I [Y er M Or Cr' rr
r-1 0
7
lJ
7 7
O
N
W
HI. - Hr• Ill- HI.-•-/--
z z
a
aQ
0
N
W
z z z z z z
I-
Z z z z z z z z z
4 a
2
ID
O_
a a a a Q d
C
GI 1.1 IJ W LJ Ll LI 61 L+
z
U U U L: U l.J
r.
U U U U U U U U U
LJ w
1L
w
Y Y
.r
rn
t ,
7 7
2-
z
S
Kfi fL'1Y CY Q::
O
000000000
z7
J
\
77
z
Q
L, LL i,1 1, L. 1..
0
h Y l.- r- r- /-. F-- r F-
Q Q
cr
(n
Z i
0
O
S= S i 2-i
(A
000"107 70
WLI
O
4
Q a Q d a a
Q
a Q .r� •r a .cr Q a c
0 7
L t
Q
7 0
.O.b
MM
NP Mf1j 10 IA V,r
A J r
r!3 C)
P 01
V•MM
N V+
n '7
r, C� V) C! n C., V,
N N
C O n ^ V', N n r h..
r.. .0 J
r� r
fO m
N .L` 00
•
• •
• • • •
• •
• • • • • • • • •
•
• •
• •
• • •
N N
OCA K
iP+ O N [> C O�
.O
`O V1 Q' •O M V+ A ff
O O
r
0 LI P
V1 J� m� M
r r
10 PI)
.O M V J M P. N
10 N
b A
P P
'. J�
•' � `O
z
•
•
0
N r M \
r r
O
Z
a
W
t.J
�T
V
1 JJJJ V
�
V JJJJ JJ`�J
JJ
J
'`®
-0o
JJ
rl
00
00
mmnc.�xmOc
00
mm00wwww M,CC
moo
m
0100
a
r
r
rrrr r -r
2
w
\
\ \ \ \ \ a
\
\\ a \ \ \ \ \
\ \
\
\
\ \
A. N. \ t\ A
A
Z h-
11 A
�D
- J O O 7 'l 7
'-7
1 7 7 7 7 7 7 J
O
"7
7
k
O
O
r.
U
Y'
'7
♦
V
♦
J J J J J J
•
J
•
•O �O •O •O •O •O 1Q •O •O
A A
♦
P
•
! 6"1
•OO
•
`
UI
M
♦
O
•
•
N
j•
N N N MN N N N N I
N N
♦
N
a
'M
I M M
• ,
d'
Wr
•
O
•
OOOOOU
•
O
•
000Oi0007 O
:7O
•
O
•
i0
`OO
•
MMMMMM
•
M
•
1.1M Nt N1 M1 MMMM
MM
•
M
•
�M
MM (
♦ i
O`
U
d
•
T
aPD'7'TP
•
0•
■
PPCT O.'P PP DI a,,
0.7`
•
P
0,
'
r
r
•
r
•
rrrr��
•
r
•
rr.-rr err
rr
♦
r
•
�r I
t
i
•
N
W
O
.f V v �f d v `• �t
E8
N N
w N^ M ,'�p.
M w •..
W
<
MET Ot
Q. Oo
w w w W 00 w w w
(�
Sn
0 0 0 0 0 0
O O p
NNt�<�rn a.
.a
Ll
p
Ll
1 m
I E 1 1 1 1
a! 1
S_
rr rtn .C+
w r
O v
J
�
u U u U u u
a
00
0
r
r r r
1
•
M
r
O
<
�wT> 21. D>
•
•t
u
W
f
p -
M1h.. f•t. fl.
i
Mir lY K K tY
f.
N
7 7 7 7 7 1 7 7
227 77.2 22
f7
at
W W W W 41w
u
EA
•
W
000 000 00
O O
W
W
VI N In N W cm -
22
7
O
Z
r
r N M t t 1 P M ✓! w
r `J N
u
�
•J
r r w r M .,}
M .}
a
as a aaaaa
1
I I I t i t l f
1 1
• • • • •
•
w
w w P w r N r r
r r
W W W W W W W W
W W
a
W
N N
D
W
F
J J J J J J J J
J J
d
1
1 1 1 1! m 1 E
1 1
c -q
A`
N
r r P r w rP r
w r
>
Z
N
rV N N N N N fv N
N N
.-�
s
N
M M N 1 H 9 M M M M
M M
fn
O
d
• P
z
u
I
MM • M
• M
• MM MM M�M
U
r
w r •. P r P r
r r
�
O
OOOOOC C'.7O
PO
N Rn N Vt VI VJ
Y Y Y X Y Y
u u u u u v
• a • � ♦ a
a a + t «
2
O
.f V v �f d v `• �t
•T �t
N N
w N^ M ,'�p.
M w •..
v
rrrNr
MET Ot
Q. Oo
w w w W 00 w w w
OE: 00
O M
0 0 0 0 0 0
O O p
NNt�<�rn a.
a
O
1 m
I E 1 1 1 1
a! 1
CL
rr rtn .C+
w r
O v
00017 r„
pp p
2
O
.f V v �f d v `• �t
•T �t
J �t
d 1 d .t �t
.f .t
v
•
Q. Oo
w w w W 00 w w w
OE: 00
00 00
00 00 00 00 00 OD
00 w
NNt�<�rn a.
a
O
W W W W 41 1:1
CL
w r w
w r
r r
P w r r P
•
u U u U u u
a
Q
0
r
r r r
M
J
<
�wT> 21. D>
•t
u
W
L I W W W W W W W
W 1.1
M1h.. f•t. fl.
i
Mir lY K K tY
L I W
N
7 7 7 7 7 1 7 7
227 77.2 22
77
(n
W W W W 41w
u
EA
W
W
000 000 00
O O
W
W
VI N In N W cm -
22
7
O
r S Z S 2 S Z x
S Z
u
•a <
qs
> o
a
as a aaaaa
Ela
J
<•
• • • • •
of
I
O
W W W W W W W W
W W
a
W
EL ti WL WL W tL
D
W
F
J J J J J J J J
J J
d
W
0 0 0 0 0 0
N N
c -q
H
O
W W W W L.- W W W
1, l L t
>
>
w W lY cc gy
7 2
a'
.-�
s
1- ti �- I- H ►- M- I-
.- f
to
fn
a a a a a (L
• O'7 •
• P
z
MMMM•t1 MMM
MM • M
• M
• MM MM M�M
a M'Nt • M'
• M
LI
fT?POMP O•.T ,?
O? • a
• O•
« PaTaTO
♦ aT a ?
• a
F
w;r P r P r r P
r r • r
• P
a P P P P r r
+ r r 1 r
• r
N
-
s ♦ E
w
0
1.,
K
N
u U
W
4
LJ C3 U U U U
2.'Z
2
tD
»»00
W W
U
1.1
td GI i.1,.1 W
0 CO
n
w
ma.a Er me
o•?
O
J
0
O
►+
to
• • • • • •
V0 W
2
O
LA
► f �� r -rte
Vi
.w
U
e000Oea •d e060
0.-
W
d
727? 77
WI.I
o
we a
of
>
<a«aa
n n
c
S
Zi
►+ r -t r-. H `-. r..
p a
O
0000C
UU
U
«
•
•
+
a
a
a
+
�'Q1Nm .01
P lJ
MNNM.p\ M
CSO a
n C
P O P O• O• W/Y O? N
!Y fr .p
1, O` r M N N
n OL? or
%
A n
MMMOCl.D MOt1',
N\ M
I^N
.O .O
PMA t+O O.O
dd J
C'1G
r q r
w r r N N M •. N U N
N .O P
NN
1010
N M N. p t+1 M M t 10
rr r CV
d 0
F
r
r P rV
N N
r M
00 K�
M M
7
• •
O C
O
M M
aC
a
W
W V
.f V v �f d v `• �t
•T �t
J �t
d 1 d .t �t
.f .t
v
t
Q. Oo
w w w W 00 w w w
OE: 00
00 00
00 00 00 00 00 OD
00 w
a
00
Y
w r w
w r
r r
P w r r P
r P
Q
r r P P r P r
r
r r r
F. 1.ti\.. I. 1`
1. t.
1. ti
M1h.. f•t. fl.
4 O
7 7 7 7 7 1 7 7
0 0
U G
o v 7 a> :2
WL o
0
> o
U Y V7
•O .O 10 10 10 10 10 `Q
f. f.
• M ' a O�
•
.NEW N N NIN
• N,N
a
til
•^ r
-�-vr.��#'.T .-7-�f'.T_—��'".Y_�_�_a""�i
f`_,"�_
_ i�-.-Er.�lc ti r� r"rr. _ __-
-
• _ �_�b.-.a _ _- _ -,; _- w _�-..,�
.,ems _
..�_.�-
---- '
OO OODO�O
00• O
'• O
r 00»O!O
• O'7 •
• P
r
MMMM•t1 MMM
MM • M
• M
• MM MM M�M
a M'Nt • M'
• M
M
fT?POMP O•.T ,?
O? • a
• O•
« PaTaTO
♦ aT a ?
• a
Oq
w;r P r P r r P
r r • r
• P
a P P P P r r
+ r r 1 r
• r
••
-
s ♦ E
W
IJ
M
d
d
x
x
dd
d
V)
d'r
y
d
y
Oo
,
co
cc
w w w m w w w
u
0o 0o
u
Do
co co cc M,
u
oo
Y
u
�
I
W
1
t
Q
�
�
r r r r •- +-
r �-
r
r
U)
♦
a
*
1
1
1
1
j
4!
Q
a
a
•
•
i
•
1
•
f
:fl
y
i
•
t� ti ti ti A A
1 A
•
t�
•
♦
a
I
LD
Z3
=3
.'
O
n
•
a
w
Y O
(
z
H Z
d
zr:
j
oc
U x
lJ
♦
+
.OCY
+
•
-
7 O '] O 7 7
•
iy
,.,
O Cl n 3
11
N
ML
d w
♦
1
•
^
•
M ,n +'ti 'M ^ to
r
n
y
•
.p
rr h N- ti ti
•
4'i T
t
Ml
[
T/1
r
o
!Pr r •�
♦
P
r-
♦
r
; T t� T !'.
p, Ly
♦
•
NIMMM MM f/1
♦
MM
M
♦
M
♦ M1+1MM
•
M
' l
^
a
•
P P P a a a
♦
P®
F
i
a
•
�
M r r
•
r
'r
O
co
P
.-
1,
Mj
•
N
cc
Hr
N(1
'O
•�M�N+-N
r+-
In
0004
r
r
r
•� +l` M �Q .p P �O
yr d
M
iJ
O O C) O
N
M
�N�hrrN
Md,
r
P�
0000
d
d
1-�M�N�N
CD0n0
r
••MM 10 10 10
0000
N
M
2
�
N
�
0O000O N
00
N
O
+-Nr N
0
J
M
N
N
IV NNNNNN
MN
N
N
.O
O
d
d
d
JSJdd�1N
dd
J
Y
d dd d
d
d
u
'x
O
d
Ca
r •-
P
(V N OC OG
r-
r
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O
c'
o
I,A In In v.
rs
G
2
tY
/Y
W 0 0 y
O
2
•ry
H W NW
i-
to
an
•a
Z W z W
y
F•
4r
•
N
V: LL W LL
an
d
U
F
•
w
•
Z I
y
Z
(r
U
>
er
..!
N
2
Q2QZ
a w a w
a
(n
y
IJ
Z
Ny
Q
f/) (,,1 yy=
O.'
4
�.
61
y
Lii
W W W W W W
y W
IJ
y y
(,i
n
•
H N M H H H
I.1 CiI.J C7
Z
N
d
J J J J J J d
•.J
A.
J
w Z w Z
J
_J
W
L I
(L M d 4
a
W �-1 W
H
O
IY
O
O
Q
d IL A a tl 0
O n.
O
d
t-
.�
�.
IJ
O
(1)
»»» f!
K O
O
0
Z Q 7 Q
O
y y y y tr y W
Q.y
41
y
►• d H d
(n
1-
tY
1.
H
(Y
N
» > >
J
O
*
Y
t.:
t c
W
dd4IL
O
U
J
O
• • • • • • •
U
ti
uc
r
~
Li
z
u
• •
U
(t
a
s s s s s s
»
W
O
yyy y
O
000 pOOO
(r
/A
•
H
O
O O
• • • •
I.-
(�
v
O
Q
U
to y en y Vl y y
t1
WHMI-
U
z
b cb In t> fll LD (D
1.
Q Q Q •i
W
W
O
S
?zz TzZz
-d da
ce
22Z7
J
J
Q
U
n
yyyy
X
-1
7
4
>
zz22zzz
G7 /1
2 a' C d'
41
J
]707»7
a a
J
Id
1.1
1-a ..
J
'L
Q
0 0 0 0 0 0
41 W
W
LL
LL LL LL LLr+
LL
w
1!
M M
N N
P D•
A N 1 A P �t d M
O L, t N
O O
O f
L2 p 17 O O
In O
O O
�. �..
1 R' 0 C I'- OC
Nn O
OOt C.•7
M- -
1h rx*
`p
`o
'�•`
✓�M
OD
`0 �O
NP Ib.Or•• N.O\
I`NP
dd
P P
C, ,( NM
d d
MM
►--
r A N 't
M M
� Ln
O N P N r
1f� N
N N
M M
In n
•o Ln r
a d
O
M IIY P
Q
W
IJ
M
d
d
d
dJ Vdrf Vd
dd
d
d
d'r
.r
d
Oo
co
cc
w w w m w w w
0o 0o
Oo
Do
co co cc M,
a.
oo
Y
�
Q
�
�
r r r r •- +-
r �-
r
r
t� ti ti ti A A
1 A
ti
t�
1� t� ti A
ti
LD
Z3
=3
.'
O
n
Y O
H Z
j
U x
lJ
♦
+
.OCY
+
•
-
7 O '] O 7 7
•
iy
,.,
O Cl n 3
11
N
ML
d w
♦
•
^
•
M ,n +'ti 'M ^ to
r
n
y
•
.p
rr h N- ti ti
•
4'i T
t
Ml
•
T/1
i
!Pr r •�
♦
P
r-
♦
r
; T t� T !'.
p, Ly
♦
•
NIMMM MM f/1
♦
MM
M
♦
M
♦ M1+1MM
•
M
' l
^
a
•
P P P a a a
♦
P®
F
•
M r r
•
r
'r
d V)
Y
u
W 1
(D
W <[ •
(DN
a V1
a W
x
d a
a
.- cs
� a
P
O a
z
N
O
2
N
z
a
O
U
u
a
Y
1 1
♦ t
Y Y
P 1
r •
d
zzzzzzz-•z
N
00
N Mac, 0 T N N T f V N N
M T�MMJ�O Po 1O^
1 I I I t f I t 1 1
•-JTrrTTttO.-
N 00 w. -N N•'NNN
M T T M M
O 000000000
N M M M M M M M M M
d J J J J J J J J J
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
T •- r r T •- T T T
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
lJ W W LI W Lt LI W W
co t.D(ALDC moo
Q4QdQ+LtQ QQ
In 2)mOmGd[L (i
LT as Lr w a. a mm
Q 4 Q Q 4 4 Q Q R
N (D tD U' ID 0 iD 0 ID
(nNN.n to vi (.�Pn n
</' W W W IJ W W IJ W 1.1
IJ •y H Py H H H H H H
NM -►.P• -
_l ti H H H H H H H H
CL J J J J J J J J J
(1_ H H H H H n• H H H
D H� r-�.-►-F��
Ln a a a 7 a a 7 a
I
•- 1- H •- 1- 1.- /- P- N
d
zzzzzzz-•z
z
W W LI L' LI LI L.1 L 6'
N
w w w i iia r r
Vl
W W W W W W 1.1 W W
c
C9 0 0 0 0 ED tD 0 t!
r M11 I
•• i
aQ a d Q C cr v a
F-
z z z z z z z z z
VP
Q a a QQ a a Q a
a
S 3r3E xV =SzS
1.1 LI W t.; L% L; 10 L, L'
W
►-►-►-H1-HHtiN
:r
N Vl co N N VP to rn V)
00
a as cd•.t .Irc •r
U-
3 3 3 2 2 3 7 3 7
00 00
OO
OL7000 G' OO JJ
VP
nnn nO-3 C, r) or Q
00
a: Ll(`
Ln �o M Ln Ln a Ln .e c Lr1
N N
N M N N N M N a O P
N
r M
I
u1
d
dddJdJd'}d
Y 1LI I
Y i
u
N
1
1
r M11 I
•• i
d
M
It
M
I
u1
d
dddJdJd'}d
It
J
d
N
d
%r IT
d
M
It
M
U
a
00
M
w x w 00 w LL Q' x w
on
00
Do
a:
00 00
00
T
M
00
M
N
•-
N
v
M
N
T
Y
T
Tr-TTT�
N
T
T
T�
T
•.,
�
N
•-
M
d
4
M
M
T T T T T T T
T T
n
N
N
N
N N
M
N
M
d
d
d
v
•.1' 1
J
d
d
1
1
!
1
1!
1
1
!
O
C7
C'
Q
Q C
O
O
O
a
a
a
a
LL
O
a
Lr
r
or
•9
ad
L1E
fJ
•
./
W
Ell
•
•
z
Y
LJ
H
H
•
O
H
U
r
z
z
u
z
1-
2
a
a
tl
ti
a
I:
Z
Z
H
U
Y •
J1
t
T TT r-T—Tf --
•
d
Lai
W W
N
G
Vl
d .t
lrl
•
s-.
H o
J
•
a
a
a
J
J J
6
r
+
• a
H
t.
O :D
d 4
O
5s
M
t
It
W •
•
r T T .- T T T •- '-
•
O
O
T
a
a En
U
d
a
•
N
W
W
N
N VI
00
2 •
M
a
M M M M M M M M M
•
M
M
M
•
Pry
H
M M
M
♦
M
•
M
•
C*
u ♦
T
•
aaaoaaaaa
•
T
Oa
O
U
�.
•
7 z
T
«
U
LJ
m
•
Q a
2
)r
H
N
•
t
W
W
41
U
W W
cG
9+
2
LL
b-
H
3 2
t.l
p
r-+
.a
Q
>
n0
to
(1
VP
H
cr
= S
a
H
VI
N
W
O
LI
J
N
V7 N
x
VI
/..
a
Ir
(^
72—
2
n
1.1
Cf
Y
O O
>
L!
LI
2
J
77
0
7
H
?
n
a
•e
¢ 5
Lr
z
(n
I,I
c
c.
a a
W
10
O
i9
CD
U)
S T-
C, C3
oo
Ln
on
TLn10
JJ
V1Lf1
Oo
o
r. re
O 1
L+ LP
n N N
.- .-
P, ti
Ll'• tr
OL' 00
00C
NN
MM
a' 10d
N V1
NM
OO
0• P
Ln V.
. N
J J
T T
O O
T T
I
d
dddJdJd'}d
It
J
d
d
%r IT
d
It
J
a
00
w x w 00 w LL Q' x w
on
00
Do
a:
00 00
00
no
00
Y
T
Tr-TTT�
4
T
T T T T T T T
T T
LL
O
fJ
Y
O
1-
2
H
U
Y •
J1
t
T TT r-T—Tf --
•
d
OY
`D
t
G
•
d .t
lrl
i
�
♦
0O
•
U r
�.
•
b 70 00 00 00 00 00 0t'. �p
•
JO
00
00
i
0`
t
O :D
-D
•
•
M
t
It
W •
•
r T T .- T T T •- '-
•
T
Y
•
N N
N
•
N
•
N
•
00
2 •
M
•
M M M M M M M M M
•
M
M
M
•
Pry
♦
M M
M
♦
M
•
M
•
C*
u ♦
T
•
aaaoaaaaa
•
T
Oa
?
*
�.
•
as
T
«
;J
•
T
•
10
•
t
•b
41
10
9+
z W W
O J J
H 4 Q
►- Nto
a W W
r-0 K K
.7
C?LY K
N O O
W LL LL.
C7
SS
_ U U
t.l er a
T Z
¢
.I
F
V+
t9
W
¢ LI W
Y J J
U Q 4
W i}
S
U ¢ ¢
K 1.1 LI
o as
o a�
2 N N
1.1
} N N
Q Q
W lr
m 0
7 7
u u u u
1 1 1 1
r` • a k
1 • • i
N 0 (A 0 V.
W 4' W IV W
u U U U u
M H H M H
K w Ix ct K
W W W W W
N N y 0 W
W LL LL W i
O o 0 O C
a a a a a
J
N
•
Lf •
H N
(D H
N i�l
Q d
V
•••
N L]
¢ K
JOJ
v+lnaoco,
� z
tag N
N p
\ 2.
H
N O
•� z
W N
72 2z 2
P. Nv1 Cir In
J
1
N 0
1
} N
s
Q =
R
IY lJ
•
/- H
w
>$ Q
a\\\\
W
Z2z
0C
J
¢ K ir w¢
90
i
r •-
In v+
,O
i
>1►r>s
00
aaa
V MMP
.• J
W W W IJ W
MM
0
a a
P P
i z Z r r
i
a a a
J
±5 H
\\ \\ \
l•I
p00
J
M
I
re of
I. •
J rn
In
t
�
a `•
rt a Q a Q
Z
!- F-
cn
K IY K¢¢
Q
q Qa
D
;_• p
Y Y Y Y Y
J
J J J
cr
J J
I
1
!
8
d
P
\
\
N
M
Q
M
O
A
A
1
1
h
1
1
O
Q
cl
O
p
A
o
o,�0
vi
r
N
0
0
o
IA.
o
P
O
♦�
C]
r
6
P
p
!^
00
•
Lf •
H N
(D H
N i�l
Q d
V
•••
N L]
¢ K
JOJ
v+lnaoco,
� z
tag N
N p
\ 2.
H
N O
•� z
W N
72 2z 2
P. Nv1 Cir In
J
F- eD
N 0
Q Q Q Q Q
} N
!n
Q =
H IJ
IY lJ
1- D
/- H
LI
C7 p„0 0
`W `r
J
Z 2 2 2 Z
V
•••
J
JOJ
v+lnaoco,
uuu
onc�A
Inv,
2 z Z z z
oc
2 2 2
W
p LL
72 2z 2
P. Nv1 Cir In
HHry
U
N 0
Q Q Q Q Q
00
00 00 0C
rn In
Y Y Y Y Y
z
/- H
LI
>$ Q
a\\\\
W
Z2z
0C
J
¢ K ir w¢
90
o0 00
r •-
In v+
,O
>1►r>s
�.
aaa
V MMP
.• J
W W W IJ W
MM
a a
P P
i z Z r r
o
a a a
J
±5 H
\\ \\ \
l•I
p00
J
�•
(A N rn In N
re of
I. •
J rn
to N to N N
p
�
a `•
rt a Q a Q
Z
!- F-
cn
K IY K¢¢
Q
q Qa
D
;_• p
Y Y Y Y Y
J
J J J
cr
J J
W
J
Q
LI
¢
¢
0
W
S
u
tr
O
u
N
u
TO
n
O
a
O
2
Q
J
D
L
V)
ts
Z
L1
W
`W `r
J J J J J
V
.► J J
J
JOJ
v+lnaoco,
.o .o
onc�A
Inv,
��
oc
oo
co
an
NP M
P. Nv1 Cir In
NN
00 00
00 w 00 00 00
00
00 00 0C
rn In
00
00
00
00
co
90
o0 00
r •-
In v+
,O
•- P
J,t)NA PO
PP
V MMP
PP
InN
MM
a a
P P
Z
a Jao v
P
.fJ
P P P P
P P P P P
N
z
P
P
P
P
7
P M
P
O
\
\
r
\
P
\
\
Q
A A
A
A
ti
L1
W
`W `r
J J J J J
V
.► J J
J
J
J
J
J
J
t
a
00 00
00 w 00 00 00
00
00 00 0C
00
00
00
00
co
90
Y
Q
P r
P P
P P P P
P P P P P
P
P
P P
P P P
P
P
P
P
P
\
\
r
\
P
\
\
A A
A
A
ti
h
n.
A
Q
a 77A
o
o,�0
0
0
0
0
o
IA.
o
0
a
0
L)
Do w w
I
•
3
P
♦
A
•
p
•
' J
•
00«
. ty
Or
M 1n
•
A A A �. I�
•
OP
00 00 00
a
0
; ^]
♦
j
«
N
«
N
•
M
•
M
J
W
N N
•
N N N N N
♦
N
N N N
♦
M
i M
•
M
«
M
•
vi
(•
M
•
M
00
S
MM
•
W11+1 MM M
«
M
MMM
R
M
M
«
M
•
M
•
!1
•
M
0 + P O�
•
?
C)• ? a
•
0+
a
a
«
31
«
I•
O+
«
a
P
P P
«
P P P P P
.
P
'
P P P
♦
P
P
�
+ I
t
,O
N
N
LI
I.1 Lt 1.1 1.1111
Y
u
aC
N
m
•a
•D •0 es b of ed
u
U u
V) N N
u
X
W t
+
•
6- W 1-
•
41
1
u
C? cn
•
U 'a
ca a as a
�
'"••
n IJ
�[aa
N S
1.J
<n Cn X Z- Z x x X*
L., e'
a<
W W W W W !s1 W W W W W W LI W W
0.1
Z
2�
ZZZZ2ZZZZZZZZT._2
•
t-�l�l.
a a a
J tT
O1 0
000 00 0 0 00000
r-
_ .a.
J J a a a
•
••
g x x r x x r 2 x x x x= x z
00
4J
ao--.-1.,..--
LL
��
t•' �
RaRRaRn. LLRRn aaRn
7
4
a s _'1 m>>> n
1 •
W W 1.1 W W 1..1 W W W W W W W W W
rcT z
H W'
0 0 0 0 0 0 0®
V)
0-
> >
®
O
a
✓:' I...I L.. I.i I:I 4' 41
a a
L i 41
W W Lt 1.J L "I 4i W "I W W 41
y
Q 2
t R
H H h �- •" f- F i•- /- 1- N F b- H 1-
t. t
A
r -a
h-
O ••
W
'J
Z:
z
eti
a
N
N w N N M w N N
M
10
Y ti
m iJ
IJ W
M
� .B •- w M .t J A
M N
•
LJ 0
I t 1 1 t� t 1
I
S W
O
f' ►+
r
.pArw w .0w
w
a
a1, J
I t
Z
N
O R.
N A M r N M
-r
M10N
r
w10
r) •..
7 �+
aacccasae
M
Ir
Y ZZ
Ra(ImCL n
�-a
J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
Z
r%
m
N
O p tV N !V N N P
p
>- I. 1-
C O O co O O O
I- 1-•
O
w (Y
M
LI Ls Li LI 1.' ISI l LI 1,. Li 1,! Lt 1.1 Li L,
ID 0J ID G m ID ID m m m m m m
r M M MMM l
V�
•,,,
L L
MM
p
Z Z
N
N N N N N N N N
�'
T S
M
M
as 71
u
�+
ssssssss
222
It
It
r
{/� � � �
N N
U
tr. v^
f
•
I l l l l f l f
YN ,. C.
1
w[` K) f+'o ry C0 r
`f .0
fJ
O J J A O .O C A
w r r
r
O
p
w r r w w w w r
• • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• •
1
rp
1 1
N N '?
�! �0 Pn N�� w V 1 �} w .p A M N M
't Fn
O O O 0 0 0 0 0
O
®
O O
I
I
.^-N I^ V+. N00 MVirNs-P P 000
rwr r wr MMMM.O .bow •- 000
1/ 1 •1 � t l a t 1 1• a t l 1 1 1
rwr NwP•-,w w�. •. pe pIDO
r,4 W) Ln At>d wfV 0-1 wNrP P 000
r r MMMM.►s�w r 000
I I I C I l l l l l t l l l l I f 1
N N N N N N N N w w r w N ry N N w N w N r
N N N N w r r
f/)MMMMMMMMMMMpe) MM
.t �t `t v3•JM`'fdV H'at s.f sJs
rw�e-r•- rrwwr r wr Ve.p w�,Q
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t.? r N M M M
LI
I.1 Lt 1.1 1.1111
or G' K (ti Q' LY
•a
•D •0 es b of ed
V) N N
•
eA •✓!
6- W 1-
•
41
2 W =
U 'a
ca a as a
�
'"••
�[aa
N S
1.J
<n Cn X Z- Z x x X*
L., e'
a<
W W W W W !s1 W W W W W W LI W W
0.1
2�
ZZZZ2ZZZZZZZZT._2
•
t-�l�l.
a a a
O1 0
000 00 0 0 00000
r-
_ .a.
J J a a a
•
••
g x x r x x r 2 x x x x= x z
Q� ul
4J
ao--.-1.,..--
LL
��
t•' �
RaRRaRn. LLRRn aaRn
7
4
a s _'1 m>>> n
ti O
W W 1.1 W W 1..1 W W W W W W W W W
rcT z
H W'
0 0 0 0 0 0 0®
V)
0-
> >
®
J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
a
✓:' I...I L.. I.i I:I 4' 41
a a
L i 41
W W Lt 1.J L "I 4i W "I W W 41
y
Q 2
H H h �- •" f- F i•- /- 1- N F b- H 1-
t. t
r -a
h-
W
'J
a
Y ti
m iJ
IJ W
LJ 0
m V)
S W
f' ►+
1- F-
U
I0
Nr�In Ln"I U) (A 01
a1, J
=€
toNy
O R.
f- ti ti n �. t.•
w m m m C m m m.
-r
O O
J J J
r) •..
7 �+
aacccasae
m u
s
Y ZZ
Ra(ImCL n
�-a
J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
•••
r%
m
n ev r K �- �• m K
J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
>- I. 1-
C O O co O O O
I- 1-•
V) L1
Cc
w (Y
LI Ls Li LI 1.' ISI l LI 1,. Li 1,! Lt 1.1 Li L,
ID 0J ID G m ID ID m m m m m m
q at
n r
-j
R a
L L
ID
Z Z
s
tr'
�'
T S
]I 3 Z ;7 2 s az zZ=�tzss
as 71
2 Z"'-''- 7 'Z7 T7Z222
222
♦ ♦
• r r
w •"
r
M It M O' J r
J S m h 7 r P
r
{/� � � �
C G O
tr. v^
•
sM1
YN ,. C.
CiC 'J
w[` K) f+'o ry C0 r
nA O
C•
fJ
O J J A O .O C A
w r r
V d V.,
p
• • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• •
h N
7
rp
^� r •-
N N '?
�! �0 Pn N�� w V 1 �} w .p A M N M
't Fn
O
C• a
r
" N J
OwR
N A
C)
W
:J v
° a
avv.ty vvv
ry
a wwxxcc m
00
0G
mx
't 't +�s"ao44'T t as
as t
y�
A A
a,mwonX ar Doan 00 ao 0o
00 00 a0
r
r r r r r r P
r
`
r w
z W a
� w��� ���
r'•'
r w w r r r
rr r •- r
r w r
rw
AA A
AAA
CD 7:D 7 CD rj
N O
i- 7
C: _ Y a •
L 10 .o z O •O .0 O
b cc C. •
I.:
♦
.
of W ►
J J J e9 J
b J J ♦
+!
fM k^
; A r-. I+. A A A' A R Imo' A A A (�. A, A
',
'
aUl! DO
M k
tb 2 ♦
W) w) W) W) M MM N1
M M r M M M M
♦ M N) t
♦
'MM
•
•
w a0 00 00 x 0n V 0o m 00 00 001x0 00 00
MK)MKI M MM MIn M Pn MiM MM
00
r U t
M
M M •
•
M M
M M M M M M M M M M M MM M M
Mr0.0 MM
• ♦
P}
rr
P ♦
♦ t
T W
r
t
�P?".T �.a T?.P�^ aP: Ora D.
Mjj M M
PIfT fT.
wjw �
OW
41
LL
00 co 00J
J J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J J J
J
J
J
\
m co CO
OD
00
OD
1C
Y
OD
co
y�
rn
N
r
h
h 1
h
r
V
`
Ll
r
r
1
\ \ \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\ \ \
\
\
Li
9
\
a
Y
O
r
j
3c
1
i i
1
U
U
co 00 00
30 00 M
•
In v� „�
•
00
P
'7
r
#
>!
0!
OG
«
P T C
i
M
M M M
!
•
#
N
«
O i•
coIr
•
PN
40
M M MW1
#
«
d
1
n
1
J
M
J
•
P
UI
PaP
i
11
O
>A
M
«
M
#
MMM
•
W
LA
r
N
'N
«
P
a
O.
«
N
P
N
PPT
«
a
*
a
!
a
_
NI
-
�
#
r
r
r
x
•
M
41
r
«
r
it
r
It
r
•
r
O C G
N r r
N
000
rM ••
J
J
OM0
r.,
O M n
o
O O O
r
Ct
O O O
r r
J
N
r
O
I
2'
G C O
rN
M J
to
M
OMO
N
fn
2
r rr
rr e.
MWN
M
N
P
M
J
r
•N
Go
J
J
N
r N7 I,
ly
P
J
J
r
M d M
J
U
10 P
a
M 1 V
O C Cj
O
O
L
O
r
r r M
r
r
R
O
O O 00
O
C
O
a
0.
z
woo
Wi-4!
•
W
J
L1
7
O
W Z W
N
4
14. 61
Cn
lr
(/1
•8
LI
N
W
1.1
0.
u
7
U
•
H
Y P-
Iy
?
N ►+
rc
w 11 W
cs Cl CD
>
In
0.
U
0 U)
41 W ISI
K
a
.
cr
a a
z
N
a •1
1 • .
W
Od
fA
LL
K
W
a
IJ L1
a
IJ
0
N'
JJ J
N
W
N
S
a G 0.
.n
Z
O
D Lt V
Q a Q
\\\
Iv
S
r. Ll H
H ....r
LL
a
a
U
LL
°
Y 1� Y
d d 0.
O
e1
d
OC
O
»
a
M
f-
I-
H
c Z a
a Q Q
K
n
li It to
ra
-y
1
0. Iti a
U U U
d
F-
t/J
S
0.
N
LLl
K it w
0:
Li
H
In
IM
to
in
41
11
Zi
Ll
fY
J
l 1 u u
•-•
K
Y
-A
LM
U
► H ►-
•.
K .T IY
7
n
IJ
• • •
U l f U
t
m
► b- ►
1 -
U
O
K
a.
rr
u u u
o
z
O
U
JJJ
f� P1 Cf
n.
N
n
U
W W W
fT'
a a n
n
�
N
J
•-
JJJ
•..
O'. C
a
4
.f
cl
1.1 I.w
Z
7T
7
O
2
•••
M d a
a
o
Q
0 0 0
N
O
4J
Li
If
W 4) W
Z
ti
0
Z
O
C
JJJ
n
IB
Q
1-
H
>
Q aQ
Ufl f)
S
J
fn
O
N
t I
J
LL LL LL
I-
or
a
D-
'^
m
a
LL LL LL
z
n
w
sss
LL LL LL
Q
QK
l.i
•.
1.1
n
cno
Y
a
►.
1.. l.. W
1.1
O!
a
K K K
K
m
N
O O 1/N O
O G O O
O O
M M
O O
V% U'1
!� f.
O C7
O O O O
0.^Y�MJ
• •
GGA to Lr
CIC;
00
mC
h N
MM
NN
C`�n In O
Jit
MM
C;
• •
f')NrN
• • • •
P 6n mi
• •
Can
• •
NN
• •
MM
• •
• •
e •
e s • •
• •
• •
rA Imo'
O` 6-7^ Ip
00
r
NN
MM
MM
JJ
Vr InO.
v 10
M 1
0.
rr pl
n•
►
+ M
•
N
W K�
r
M N
rIj
o
• •
41
LL
00 co 00J
J J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J J J
J
J
J
\
m co CO
OD
00
OD
OC,
W 00 OD
OD
co
r
\ \
\
r
r
`
r
r
in
\ \ \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\ \ \
\
\
\
a
Y
O
U
U
co 00 00
30 00 M
•
In v� „�
•
00
P
'7
r
#
>!
0!
OG
«
P T C
•
M
M M M
!
•
#
N
«
O i•
coIr
•
PN
40
M M MW1
#
«
d
1
J
M
J
•
P
UI
PaP
11
P
«
M
«
M
#
MMM
•
r
r• r
•
#
«
P
a
O.
«
«
P
«
PPT
«
a
*
a
!
a
_
rr r
#
r
r
r
r
•
r
41
r
«
rrr
it
r
•
r
•
r
00
N
V)
YN
iv
Y
Y
ca
WI
4
u
u
u
U
1
1
.
a rn.
•
°#
#
a
41
�°
i
00
!
.
h
a.
OD
A
O
•
�
VJ
e-M1/N
rN
000
V)00
N
MOO
N)0.
0000000ry
•
t 1
I t
1 1
rr •-M..S
v
r 00000
{,..
O
'O
rr A N,0
'
hN
,., ,S
1
r O O
t 1
M
1 1 1 1
t
N
N v V N
'C KJ
N
M • S
r.N
W
'r +,
K: Y5
r V1
MOO
000.
0`
00000
:x
OCIOON
00000 v
1 1
M
e -.-MM
z
M
00
00
NCO
00
1 1 1
coa
pn
1
1 1 1 1
Q
b
N
r V N N/ V N
N N
M M
M M M
r 0
M
00 00 Mwl
0 0
r
u
?In
CJ
t
1 1
1 1 1
1 1
vJ.f V J
v
JJ.•J
r
r r 0 r 0
00000
r
A
00000
0
1
1
1 1 1 1
ie
r_^_.p
0 N
00000
0 0
rr 0
C
C 0000
'O
:t
OOOO
ii
•
.
auu
. . . •
K
K
1.1
Z
R W W
W W W W W W
/.•
•
•
�: tt
M
0 O
v; rn
•C 00 40 00 M
tq
is
d
t-
• uu
W Lr
W
z
:H:
x
r
►+
•0 an
2KK
wN
F
H
U
Q
`t
h. 1.1 W
D. 9
-' 2 7 2
rn
=
Nrn rnNZ
rn N
tD LI)
k = 2
T►.N
17. 0"IA
tY
0
LJ w Li u
H H
2
O O
W W
Q Q `<
W
N N N (/1
•
N ..-1 M M •
�+ •+
•
(n rA
Z Z Z Z Z
W
N
W W IJ W
Z
H
JJ J0.
JJ
• •
W
�-
7)
ad dtLp
laLd
w�
••••••
tl tr.
00000c9 to
LL
-JJ -A_j
A tiJdd
H
o
»»o
»
Cr gr
�zz
(3n
cinoon
o
n. a.e.n
WV)
N N N t.J
to Vl
G. (L
O W L I
W C K
K lY
a.
J J J J J
M p
!
m:
a
a` "n M (n to
4
to to N
rn
1
LI
V)
h
C1 5..1
�y
litiaa
N H ►. N
I,y
a'4
y
• • • • •
�YK
t.: W
r�N
\ \
V) A
`� t9 O O C7
u
Z
OOOt7
4 W W 41
4J
r
O
W W 41 W W
lD 2
00
Z z 7
~
s z a s
Z Z
.-1 N �+1
7 Z Z Z Z
C9
W Vl W
4)
n
h
S 2 2 T 2
J J
w^ 7
N N
C < Q Q v
2
1.1 t.J
O
W
W W W W W
L) L)
-J JJJJ
7 7 T 7
C7
G3 tJ t.1 GIW22
LIW
JJ
U u U U tJ
•„r., p„IH
'
to rn (A cn En
mm0]m
-
Y
YYYYY
YY
y�
L)U
L LL
Y Y YYY
N
d
ac a at
, a
.,tet
b
• •
KmtY tY tY
p
JJJJ
S
Z22TT,
2 2
1 Z
r.itivn
C
WL:WW
CA
V1 tN 0 N to
'n c7
rn N
N N t/)
v) N
N N t/1 N r/1
N
N N to rA
M
d
C'
AA
00 00
NM V+PdM
M A 0, w C)
or vN
.0NGo
p000
OOp
«
101010.c,cO
«
P O
•
• •
• • • • • •
r M 6M!�
00 LA
MCI `-,
�' '�
J J O, J P M
.Q ^t7
r M N M
N d•. r -a 0
N
N
AA
MP r.ON
NM►-
A,pv
MCtr r
MNA
0 r
N 0 00
MAO
M r n t T
M Or) v, 0
N M M
P M VMpr
M
J
N
C,
x
a,
P N ,0
P
N r N r N
N
t
O
t10P
Jv
Z
r0
i
n
Li
4 :.1
v
30
vJJVJ
00 00 00 110 00
vv
00
JJ
JVJ
JJ
Jvvv.p
J
JJv
\
00 00
00 w 00
00 00
00 00 00 00 00
W
cc 00 00 00J
Q
r
r
Ore -•-r
00 r
r 0
_\
\ ^ �.
r r
\ \
\ \ \\\
r- e-rr r
Vl
W
1•.\
\
A
\\\\\
AA A AA
0r
\
0r
r r r
r,�
r r r r
r
a -r 0r
r r r
Q
b
0770b
AAA
AA
AAAAA
A
\,\ hr�,
O
>
0
�
2
F'
u
Y
«
N
MMM MM
a
MM
•
0000
«
AA A
00 00
«
b
bOZ)0
-30
J ]
1 D
NO,OM00,Ou
M
M M M M M
M M
M M
M M
«
V N N «
N N N ryW
U
MM
a
MMV)
-A 6M
M
0000!
«•
"pnP
0•
a1MNa
#O
Li
W
CLOp
cc 00 00 OD 00 00
ou 00-4
00
30
yr
>Li
u
00
f
00
M,
cox
'Ir
OD
10
10
LM
rNO
lid
V 'o 'o '0.•O 'o
C3
U
N N N mi
NN'
N
OMO.
0 C7) c!,
- 1:1
Ift A^ L,% ^
"V�
•
In
N
O In a
pn
fli
" on on m wv W,
In -n
rlj
10
7) 0
0,
..ate
0• 0. co.0S o' 0�
010,
:
0
0
♦
10 30
c, m
71
a
2a
cr
cr X
-4
mea
21
41
(1)V7
ar
U
00
n
cn
la W W
tr
u
:3
U
V)
113
LI) M
4)
a
3. 2.
I" Li w 9.1 w I" -j W
61 LL
Or cr Ix
JJ
In
LL
-1
wuw
0 CM (A
0-4
ul
C�
cr
tj
Li & 9L n- M 4L M (L
0
0
-0
:) = m = D .9
crcr
7
U: L: 1:
0 cn In 0 (e) (i
rL
u
7cr
--1
04595
Kir
CIL CL CL
1.1
m D =5
CP 0aa
0 tD
X 1-J 1-1 t- L -J U! 6.1 Li
(L
222
U
C,
1.l yHyNON VI
Z
C3
LI W 47
W w 111 Ili Ij
LJ uj
2. :3. 21,
cz cc W -
er W
n.
cr
at
O www000m
W Ll
V)
x
<
1,-
(A (A
z m =
Z�
ai M en an
-a -T
cc cr
4`1 LO W
J12.9
JJ JJJJ
ce
W41
W
P
1.1 U
-Z -1
W LP
UJ LLJ 6 Ll W
CL Q-
U-
LD
-i
T
:3 n :3 D :) :) -3
D
k-
U;
-i
m
U3
cn J) (A CA G-) (4 f/)
--3
LJ L,
F-4
IM
C) 00 Nto) r
M LIN ao
z
r)
C) 0 C) C3
INJ•
In
r) C:)
co
OC oc
X00
r
W)
viN
6'%
110 C; .0
N ol
rr
ml C)
Li
W
CLOp
cc 00 00 OD 00 00
ou 00-4
00
30
10
00
00
M,
cox
'Ir
N- F.
lid
V 'o 'o '0.•O 'o
U
N N N mi
NN'
•
- 1:1
Ift A^ L,% ^
LIN 61%
•
In
-j
00
" on on m wv W,
In -n
10
7) 0
0,
tj
0• 0. co.0S o' 0�
010,
:
W,
0
♦
10 30
71
41
W
W
J
J
d v .t
J
v
o
O70
00
30 00 00
00
00
00
b
00
J
00
J
d
r
J
J J
\
\
^ \ \
\
\
\
\
00 00
\
0000
10
D
Wt
00
LO
00 00
Y
\
\ \
Is V,
]
7
7 7
Y
O
0-
z
H
00
U
Y
u
N
M M M
d
t •
^,
_
`T
W
'
0p
]
0 7 0
r ra
r,,
0 O
.]
O
00
i
M
l0
•
m
)a
70
D
)0
'0 10
P
U
I It
o
M
M
M
M
M
M
M M
O ii
®
r
r •- r
r
•-
r
N
r
r r
r
r
�
I
N
00
•
M
ti
�e
N
2
N
•-
O t O
O
�
O
r
M
0 0 0
M
O
M
M
O O
op
N
_
1
1
1
1
1
cc
N
•
.p
.p
O O O
O
N
O
N
r
1
1
O O
O
Z
N
r
0 0 0
O
O
r
M0
O O
•-
r-
r
1
1
/ !
;Cl)
ClO O
O
M
O
M
M
O
r
z
~
^1
O O
f
n1
I °
1
1
1
M
M
M
r N
O
O
r
O
1
1 1
O
N
M
v1
I^
N
U'+
N
r r
M
J
M
Q
O
r N
O
J
J
MMM
M
J
M
P
M
N
M
r
r r
U
e}
„�
J J
J
M
O �
P
O
L 6®
u'. N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
NA 1A
to
W
a
0
•
•
a
2
LI
a
pl
to N
41
L
to
•
I.1
O
•e
•
W
K
K
N N
LL
ea
ad
x W
Q
40ur
F-
•
2
n
•
� LL
m
to
I I
•
i1
..
rn
rar
2
u
iY
eY
►-
a..
Y H
•
iY
►s
•
r-
Z
4;
T
K
�..
W
W
z
2
Q z
O
m
O
ry
f„ /
Y 1—
vQ
•a
x x x
z
w
'
Q L 1
Q:
o
2
..
U
Q z
Y)T
a a a
N
c'
rn
T
O
t-�
L;
a. W
!n
1.. H 0.'
W
•[
p
•
•
Z
J
cr)
N
h
N
A
Oc]
(/)0 y
z
J
d
d
I.I c�
K Z
•
4
J
•
J
W
O
T
W W W
p
0.
D
s-.
M
W re
•
C^
U
0_
•
fY ,Z
0—
O
U
LL
✓i
LL
O
O
a y
n
N
4...
Q
0
LL
W) -f
r+
61
to
Q .Y Q
l.�
O
6)
O
D
2 a
J
cr
4
'•
O
T
O
ss.. y
to VI fn
i,'
Q
`
0.
L1
ti
N
e-�
I,I
W
J
~
F
K
t7
L.1 41 W
to
Y
u
c
L r
= 3
a
aU.
K
I J
1
J J
IJ
711a
z z z
a
T x
2
Q
I.1 1.1 W
°C
U
w
_�
'n
re
\ \
u
J
W
>>>
N
W
O O
J
c�
2
C7
2
w
Y dC
n
z
K
tJ IJ W
GI
N
.c a
I, I
®
to
W
W
2
2 ,Z
a
�-.
en
O
N
z
O
z
1.1
.1
f)
tf cr
z
N
to
W LL LL
O
Q
2
J
to
61
W
v
O O
O
Q
r i
o
K
af_
W
W
2
~-
to
rn
h
4
T
N,
J
S T S
W
W
S
K
W
In V)
T
41
t
7
a
N
►-
U (.)
2
S
C C. G'7
J
'M
N fi'
W
ed
O
U
U
u
u u u
W
-.1
1.1
O
Y
J
LL
c^
S
2
7
J
Ct
Ct
7 2
o
r.O
!'10
en^ J`o
NJ Mi
K
�Otn
C)O
NN
•
�
.
i
t
000
l'.
r
1'-
•N..r
00 X
mtX`
OO
JJ
OC
�C)�
Cc` OC
•
J J
V, W,
N V
1 0o v') C'
M M
•- '-
O O
fT P
\
M .(;. P
J J
C O
•
ti ^
•
• •
• i
J b
N �'
r r
00 PD
1010
P� .O
ro 00
r r
_•
b P
O d
400
w
:
a
M O
O
O
N N
.-.
• r
Z
ti A
r
b
a
W
W
J
J
d v .t
J
v
O70
00
30 00 00
00
00
00
b
00
J
00
J
d
J
J
J J
\
\
^ \ \
\
\
\
\
00 00
\
0000
10
D
oG
00
LO
00 00
Y
\
\ \
]
7
7 7
Y
O
0-
z
H
U
Y
u
N
M M M
d
,^
^,
`T
W
'
0p
]
0 7 0
O
r,,
0 O
.]
O
00
i
M
l0
00 00 M
m
)a
70
D
)0
'0 10
P
U
M
M M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M M
�-^
r
r •- r
r
•-
r
r
r
r r
r
r
�
I
r
r
W
J
a�
•-
J
a0
r
J
00
r
J
«.00
\
V
^
J
\
J
\
J
OL,
\
J
cc
J
cc
J
OD
J
00
0
J
00
i
O
Wh.
t.
W
I
3
LD
•
Y
p
CIS
N
U
•
w
a
t,l
•
n
t
CO
LL r- H
w
Q
M
4
t.3
O Nwo0
z
cr
N
•
•
1.
t
r r C11,SZ7
O
•D
•-
i
J
st
co
n
M
a
.-
P
r
M
'.
.-
J
N
00
W
® •" t O 2 Cl) 0
N
N
00
M
;-
M
N
]0
MW)
1
N
w
O
N
30
pry
�
N1
a ;
,IRi
30
M
a
y
oD
A
W
•
oD
td
z J O Cg) W
1-•
•
1
•
ti
Z
!L
O J W G'i F
4
O
•
R
W2
'
o
o
ti 6 a
�
j
1
u
N
®
o
U
«-
Vt W z z
n W W O fd [) 4J
U
.7r
a
C/)a
oZ-t
m
tY
z
H
Z
2 W
a W O r Y
cn
n
o
a
-1
f
p
r
r-
LA
p
<
N
oo
0
r
N
•d
a
LL Cr • J W W W
c
co
to
N
N
h.
tvl
Z
•
2
2
O
O
N
1
N
10%0
O
N
J
r
1
•.
10
1
O
•"
N
J
�7
1
r
`•
O
M
N
d
d
fV
'
N
M
1
O
•-
NN
J
b
N
1
�
N
ap
i
N
M
V
d
r
�
.-
M
1
O
r
N
V
O
d
J
/
J
O
M
M
O
N
J
1
c v,
J
N
M
N
N
r
p
ry
r
1
r
M
r
J
p
M
M
1
r
N'+
•'-
•-
.1
•r„
1
O
O'
M
P
/�
1
J
r'
\
p
N
M
N
M
N N
M M
/
r r
N N
M M
1 p
N O
M
N N
1,1
J
d
Y
J
a�
•-
J
a0
r
J
00
r
J
«.00
\
V
^
J
\
J
\
J
OL,
\
J
cc
J
cc
J
OD
J
00
0
J
00
i
O
Wh.
t.
Y W
3
LD
•
Y
p
U
•
w
a
t,l
•
n
•
LL r- H
w
Q
M
a,
O Nwo0
z
cr
N
•
•
1.
r r C11,SZ7
O
•D
•-
i
1-
2
co
n
M
a
.-
P
r
M
'.
.-
J
N
00
W
® •" t O 2 Cl) 0
N
N
00
M
;-
M
N
]0
MW)
1
N
w
O
N
30
pry
�
N1
a ;
,IRi
30
M
a
y
oD
A
W
•
oD
td
z J O Cg) W
1-•
•
tr
ti
Z
!L
O J W G'i F
4
•
R
W2
o
o
o
ti 6 a
j
1
u
N
®
o
U
«-
Vt W z z
n W W O fd [) 4J
U
.7r
'''
C/)a
oZ-t
m
tY
z
H
Z
2 W
a W O r Y
cn
n
-1
f
°
0
o-
•d
a
,
c
LL Cr • J W W W
W
W
tvl
S
W
S
Z
S
Z
LL W d YSN0a
W
P+
CA
V'
vl h• W U • H O O
0.
a 10'1
d
f.
0_
tr CL
W
d
!
N
N
W
J
d
it 47 0' P- F i,, !f
O
L Y • Q Y V) S • H
O.
c
C7
O
1-
U
tY
W�
-
W < 01 Q p O W W Q • LM
cD a X U Y O p, 4^ CD A
1.t
F-
c�
D
IJ
U
6cri
O
Vi
O
O
<L
•
I.1
U
W0
7
♦r
y
Z
C
2
7
L:
N
4
7
K
Y
JJ JJJJJ-jJJ
S
J
J
O
y
t
p.•
H
M
a
-i
�a<aaaa•$aa.a
U
2
O
V)
N
tY
W
Q
Jh
lY
F F H H ►- ►,. ►- h •,-
tJ
J
y
00000Q 00000
O
O
M
W
r^e
:I.
G
i ,1
1 3
~
I. t
L- /.• F- M� F H 1- i- F- Y� F..
Q
Z
Q
J
C)
ED
P-
77
N
~
O
Y
W
W
1
bt
O
H
d
d
sr
J
t.l
a
Q
P]rr•. NNNMMM-s
7
Z
U
`"'
to
C9
D'
t't
O
J
�n
•
N
LlN
0'
❑OOOObGb000
i•
•
U
„Jyi
Y
1
z
f
J
.ap
e
Lt
A
7 Z7 777777' 7
O
J
•
Lt
Q_
r
4-'
4
ad
O"'1
O»7»>O»7
1i1
i
O
=
4. IL JL k k 4 LL
OG
JJ
OO
C,Ci
to
N N
[�O
CSU
OO
-y
nn
u 00
O4
OO
1010
N N
.o
C, O
t C�
�O .f'
In 1
n,7
P r
MM
a;ONMNNa•tnOOh
to In
M M
t/1
• •
• •
•
• •
• •
• e
r
CcW
PP
•-r
y,
NN
N
NN
a,
.p �O
1: z
010,
MM
010,
• • • • • • • • • •
AD•N1�IDNNVI
~
C3
MH.
tiN
rr
MM
IJ�M
'OOr .p M.Or/0 •.A00
1,1
J
d
Y
J
a�
•-
J
a0
r
J
00
r
J
«.00
\
V
^
J
\
J
\
J
OL,
\
J
cc
J
cc
J
OD
J
00
J
00
J
00
i
O
Wh.
t.
3
LD
a
Y
p
N
I
i
U
J-
IC
a'•
Y
W
2
U
co
n
M
a
.-
P
r
M
'.
.-
J
N
00
W
r
N
X)
M
N
N
00
M
;-
M
N
]0
MW)
1
N
W
N
M
r
O
N
30
pry
�
N1
a ;
,IRi
30
M
a
N
D
pn
a
7
M
W
o_
.-
M
�0
a
•
«
•
r
t ,
o
o
o
o
W
tD
w
Q
I
a
w
w a
2 W hh F -H
O N .a a,2 Z
I" 41 L, 1.1 4.1
a w a LI Lt W W L 00
tY F- h d C O O C O tY [Y
n waaaaa
Llc
N O.r Z Z S Z S LL J Y
aC C H
Z O s. a t Q Q M W Kx J
1.1 t t t t . fV• CO !> N
r A 11 P C] •- U W a r
A w W M r y d 0
K
I.!
h
to
>-1
L1
L�
cr
Y J J J J J J J J J J
u
I J h ►- r h r t- h h 1- r
y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 d 0
u NNMhH!-rr ra
r
O NMM�ac d?.d� rM
O MLIN MMM M.O o` a0 K9
Z
L. cocoon on clo J
� z�9azzaa » a
LL LL LL 4 LL 1a, LL 4 LL LL. C+
r
000M0M O` e -N10 .L+
cnlnCQ
MNOCd`O 1-10 +O CO
NPM M N O N 1-1 h N r
V aC OC a0r Mop MSO h. •D
:3 Mr MMM 00 �•. ap e -
O A M T
S N
a
W
IJ
�
a
0
Y
Q
2
W
N
r
j
Q
�
LL
d
O
i
1-
z
Ll
Y
U
f
W
C; 00 Qg o N M 7 Irl � h 00 m
,� +-+ N N N N N N N N N N
O %0 ~.o � ti0 �D �-o � �o %.0
1� -4 .-1 —4 .-a
H
¢7m 00 M
® h O N -It N 00 O O ON O O
C N O O 00 M O M N 0 c11
U 0 M 1-1 0 - p � �o O N
111 c11 ---1 00 h ul 00 00
N
3-1
a)
J1
00 1~ O f~ (1)
cSf U U a) U
1.1
w a) H U) p 3 CiCd 0.
w —I Iz :1 : \ W
.0 O w p 1 ca Q) a)
•rl U = cd m = (1) ✓� r -I
U x cSS r -i cn
to a \ >
—1 a) co O 0 a) m m
0 a = a = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _
0
cn `�
t
c9 ai � � � G
a'+ H U u u U •1 0 jz: bo 8
H r -i ca '-1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = U > 11 cd 7 •ri
cd w z w w m O a) -H ,a O :3
P-4 \ \ \ .a }4 (n U U 3-I G'
1 m m m m 71 0. �D ca �4 0 w
m m a) Q) aJ (3) va p. : 1
Q) a) •rl •H •r1 •rl N 1.1 cl w H r-1
H(1) rA
¢ r i rl r1 H rl Q) C P m a In
aL' cjj 1.-1 .1-1 1J -W 1 :7 a
1 ) � ' 4.1 ca
En � � O 0 p Q O u 04 1:4 O U
p �O C71 M -+ w w O 00 0 -4 N M In 1,0 On -4 Ln 0 C3 N h M Ln O O -+ Ir) Lr) 0 O
H 0 O N et N M (:,4 O Lr) O 00 't M O N o0 M O 1r) 00 00 ---1 nl N O O a N m O O
00 N O N 0C� O MC h M O N O N O Lr
0 110 m --a 1n N N M r-+ --1 M 1%0 M 1.11 u-1 O Lr) Cl) , - N 't m "o N - O c11 IO %10 O N
O 1rs N r M M � It N r 00 M M 1r1 00 00
d --1
Lr) -+
H
U
u 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O
.--1 ---1 --i -4 r -f .--1 --1 r-1 -A 1-1 -'"I ---I ri ri --1 --1 1 --i --I --1 a -ti .--i --1 r•i
C O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0
--.I --1 .--i --1 _4
1 � • ,-a .--1 .-� r -d •-� -'"I r-1 r•+ r•1 r-1 ri r-1 r-1 r -i r-1 r -I --1 --'I r-1 ---I r -i --1 ---1 --i 7 .--i ri M �t .-+
U p O O 0000000 00 000000000000 O 1n hh 00 Lr) O
Q+
Op ,._1 M N N --•+ N N .-1 CO 00 ul N N CO 00 N N S c11 N --1 N N N N O r-+ O O 0 --1
Q� p� M M M IT M M I'D � vD O h O
,_..1 ---I cn *-+ 00 h N --+ O ^I O
M N N '-1 N N r•+ CO 00 Lr) N N 00 00 N N cn N r-+ N N N N O --+ 0 O 0 -�
M -t -t M .O co "D -•I ---1 rn .t %-O -1 --4 M -7 M M t "0 - O h O O O �7
+-� p O O 0000000 00 000000000000 r - -+
---1 M h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h .--I r-+ —A
H N --+ M M M M M M rn c''1 M M Cl) cM Cl) M M M M Cl) M M M M M 111 ,t h O� cn Irl
ra �t -:T-TItIt•.t :I. -T-T 7't -t It -t 7It 7 - -t Cl) -z I
W,..� --1 � � � _-I � � r -I -'-1 ..-a .--a .-a --1 r-1 ---i .--I .-i --a � ,--I r-+ r -I .-1 ,-1 .y .-1 .-+ M �t •--a
Q
0 0 0 o0000Oo 00 000000000000 0 Lr, h OG L'1 O
6
z
U
H
x
U
E -H
z
d
O -4 N -:T Lr) \10 r� O a\ O
M M M M M M M M M -It
O O O O O O O O O O
�10 �.® 1�0 \10 \O \O \O 1.0 %O I'D
.-4 -4 1--1 1-4 -4 e --I i -i .-d -1
It .-1 140 � r- M
O
v
ro
O
00
O
00
r- O
O
O
O
N
00
O
O
M
et O
40
01
Lr)
00
- O\
01
O
N
O Irl
O
Lr)
N
I'D
m
-'
O
•-4
�
.•-t
u1
i~
m
N
1-1
-4
O
00 -I
It .-1 140 � r- M
00
O
O
Irl
O
.--a
Vr -
N
O
v
ro
O
00
O
W
re
Lr) Lr) O O
00
O
v
v
N
00
0
O
N
�
r- r- O Lr)
O
0D
C
cr1
CO
C�
O
N
v
00 C . + If 1
O
O
ir)
r -I
\�O
rn
i~
v
>4
1-1
�4
x
.--�
ca
r.
cyll
v
U
.-1
O
G
M
Lr)
r
O
m
-+
v
N
U
rl
M
N
r I
U
S4
N
U
ro
OIN
U]
OIN
UN
�4
H
rl
CC
4-I
�t
�7'
i
I
�Y'
�t
�t
a
d•
o
�
4-+
Uro]
H
I�
v
G
4-4
�
H
00
.0
4J
O
O
4
cn
O
ri)
0
ro
ro
P4
ro
A
is
U]
Q)
U
z
z
'-+
a
v
�.
1•.1
4.1
O
4.1
4J
i4
41
4-1
4-1
--j
`J
•rl
4
•rA
�
ro
•H
•H
0
4�
w
en
m
r
o
Q
ro
co
P4
1-4
r'+
Qi
a
�"'•i
Pa
U
x
00
O
O
Irl
O
.--a
Vr -
N
O
O
rn
O
00
O
W
re
Lr) Lr) O O
00
O
O
O
N
00
0
O
Cl)
�
r- r- O Lr)
O
0D
C
cr1
CO
C�
O
N
O
00 C . + If 1
0
0
ir)
•-+
\�O
rn
O
O
.-a
1-1
M
1-0
.--�
sr1
r.
cyll
N
r-+ r-+ N .-+
.-1
O
G
M
Lr)
r
O
m
-+
v
N
U
rl
M
N
r I
U
S4
N
U
O,\
OIN
r^
OIN
UN
(u
r -i
�t
�7'
�t
�'
�Y'
�t
�t
�t
d•
_
U
4-+
Uro]
H
I�
4.1
G
H
�
00
00
00
00
O
O
00
00
00
0 0 0 0
f4
P4
(1)
A
pro
U]
1•.1
4.1
O
4.1
4J
i4
41
4-1
4-1
•rl
•rl
4
•rA
•r -i
ro
•H
•H
'ri
4�
a
04
04
cn
a
04
Px
a
00
O
O
Irl
O
.--a
Vr -
N
O
O
rn
O
00
O
00
re
Lr) Lr) O O
00
O
O
O
N
00
0
O
Cl)
�
r- r- O Lr)
O
0D
C
cr1
CO
C�
O
N
O
00 C . + If 1
0
0
ir)
•-+
\�O
rn
O
O
.-a
1-1
M
1-0
.--�
sr1
r.
cyll
N
r-+ r-+ N .-+
.-1
O
00
M
Lr)
O
r�
1�
-+
0 0 0 0
N
N
M
M
N
O
N
N
N
--+ .--i r--1 1--1
O,\
OIN
a1
OIN
UN
M M M M
�t
�7'
�t
�'
�Y'
�t
�t
�t
d•
� �t t �t
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
.-1 .-r 1-4 .--a .-1 .-a � .-1 .-a 1-4 1-1 .-o .-1
0 0 0 0 o O O O O 0000
.-i ,-- r--1 --4 .-1 .--1 1-1 r -i r-1 .--i ri --1 r1
00 OO 00 Oo 00 O O 00 o O O o 0
O
O
O
O
O
00
O
O
O
cV Cl) M r-
0
O
O
O
O
O
--1
cn-
O
O
O
-I N -+
O
O
O
O
O
00
O
O
O
N M M r -
O
O
O
O
O
-+
O
O
O
r-+ r-+ N .-+
N
9
O
M
O
r�
1�
-+
0 0 0 0
N
N
M
N
N
O
N
N
N
--+ .--i r--1 1--1
O,\
OIN
a1
OIN
UN
M M M M
�t
�7'
�t
�'
�Y'
�t
�t
�t
d•
� �t t �t
00
00
00
00
O
O
00
00
00
0 0 0 0
•--4 O �.O �O ir1
00
0 0 -+ O\ 0�
O
r•-+ O M N N
O
�0 M r- O N
O
I'D M
-
c?
--1
cn-
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Shakopee Fire Truck Committee
RE: 1500 GPM Fire Pumper
DATE: July 16, 1984
Introduction and Background:
The truck described in the attached specifications will be the
second unit to respond to fires in the Shakopee fire district.
This unit will be the first to respond for a mutual -aid call.
For our typical call in Shakopee, our first truck to respond is
a pumping engine which carries only four fire fighters and the
necessary equipment for a very quick initial response and attack
on the fire by two or three fire fighters. Due to the exponential
spread of a fire in relation to time, timeliness of this initial
attack is extremely important.
The pumping engine described in these specifications will carry
at least seven fire fighters which are needed to back up the
initial attack with more manpower and additional hoselines.
This unit is also equipt with at least a 1500 gallon per minute
pump. This will allow this pumper to supply adequate volumes of
water from the hydrant system or a drafting source to the initial
pumper and on the later arriving vehicles.
A permanently plumbed balanced proportioning foam system is to
be installed on this pumping engine. This system will allow
very quick and precise applications of large volumes of fire
fighting foam. This can be done without the additional setup
time or other application difficulties associated with less
sophisticated systems. We find this foam system to be an
extremely important part of this vehicle. Due to the large
volumes of hazardous materials moving through this City on a
daily basis by both road and rail and that stored in our indus-
trial facilities this foam capability is a necessity. Much time
and effort has been spent on developing the criteria and sub-
sequent specifications for this system. The system which is
specified has been determined to best meet these criteria and
specifications.
Due to the extremely severe operating conditions a fire ser-
vice pumping engine is routinely subjected to, great care has
been taken in the drawing of these specifications to build in
what is necessary to ensure a long service life for this unit.
This department would like to see a service life of at least 20
years with as few maintenance problems as possible. We present-
ly have a 1947 pumper still in active service today. This is
due to the high quality standards which were used in its manu-
facture and purchase combined with an excellent maintenance pro-
gram. In the specifications of this unit a long service life
1500 GPM Fire Pumper
July 16, 1984
Page -2-
has been ensured by the specification of well established
mechanical and electrical systems which to the best of our know-
ledge are least prone to failure or aging.
The metals to be used in the construction of this vehicle are
specified as either stainless steel, aluminum or heat treated
galvaneal steel. Each of these metals may be used on various
parts of the apparatus depending on the structural needs in
these areas. All of these metals possess excellent corrosion
resistance and structural strength, thus preventing costly and
debilitating maintenance problems.
Great care has been taken in describing the fabrication and makeup
of the water tank carried on this vehicle. This part of a pump-
ing engine is extremely susceptible to corrosion problems and
various other types of damage. These problems have caused this
department great difficulties in the past on our pumping engines.
If these specifications are followed, many costly and untimely
repairs along with the associated down time can be avoided.
When a fire service pumper is down for repairs the City is in
a sense partially unprotected.
Occasionally in these specifications, specific brand names and
models of mechanical and electronic equipment are specified.
This has been done to ensure uniformity in the vehicles used by
this department. We have done this for two reasons. First, to
expedite repairs due to our ability to keep the more routinely
needed parts in stock and make this vehicle an easy fit into
our present maintenance system. Secondly, due to the number
and variety of people which will be required to operate this
pumper, it is absolutely necessary that the basic operation and
principles of its operation be identical to our other pumping
engines. This avoids operator errors which could be extremely
dangerous to fire fighting personnel on and off the fire scene.
Due to the additional costs incurred by the specified foam system
and a body style in the crew cab area not routinely fabricated by
most manufacturers, additional frills on this apparatus have
been minimized. A functional basis for all of the listed
specifications has been established to provide this City with
the best piece of equipment at a reasonable cost.
All manufacturers of fire service apparatus should be able to
bid this piece of equipment competitively. The only problem
which may be encountered could be the water pump. The brand we
we have specified is "Waterous". This is identical (except for
gallonage) to the other pumpers we have in service today except
the 1947 pumper mentioned earlier. We feel that this type of
pump is necessary to keep the operation of this vehicle identi-
cal to the other equipment we have in service. This is done
once again to minimize operator error and maintenance problems
Another pump system should be considered only if it can be used
without causing the above mentioned problems. Most fire apparatus
manufacturers are able to install a Waterous pump and do so
routinely.
1500 GPM Fire Pumper
July 16, 1984
Page -3-
The time donated by the seven fire fighters on this committee,
which is under the direction of Assistant Fire Chief Charles Ries
and Chief Joe Ries, is well in excess of 1000 man hours. This
time has been used for researching various pumping engine
systems, visiting other departments to investigate other
apparatus brands and styles, and visiting various manufacturers
and their facilities. This has been done to develop specifica-
tions for a fire service pumping engine which will most effectively
serve this City's needs and remain in effective service for as
long as possible.
JR:cah
C/ -nL-,
INVITATION FOR BIDS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: Sealed bids will be received by the City of Shakopee
for the furnishing of all necessary labor, equipment and material for one
(1) Class "A" Triple Combination 1500 GPM Pumping Engine.
Bids must be filed with the City Clerk, at 129 East First Avenue, prior to
1:00 p.m. on August 17, 1984 at which time they will be publicly opened in
the Council Chambers of the City Hall, Shakopee, Minnesota.
Bidding forms and specifications may be obtained from the City Clerk's office.
Bids must be filed in accordance with the specifications of the City.
A certified check, cashier'"& check or bid bond in the amount of ten percent
(10X) of the total bid must accompany each proposal as a guarantee that if
the bid is accepted, the bidder will enter into contract and furnish a performance
bond in the full amount of the contract.
The City is not subject to State or Federal taxes.
The City of Shakopee will furnish the successful bidder with any applicable
tax exemption certificates.
Bids must be submitted in a sealed envelope marked "Bids for Fire Apparatus
and Equipment", and the name and address of the bidder.
The City reserves the right to alter or change specifications and to reject
any or all bids received or to waiver any informality in the bidding.
All contacts with City officials from the time this bid is let until a bid
is awarded shall be through the Assistant Fire Chief Charles Ries (Truck Committee
Chairman). No exceptions to this will be tolerated.
G> ZnL
PUBLIC NOTICE
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Notice Far Bids.
Sealed bids will be received by the City of Shakopee for the furnishing of
all necessary labor, equipment and material for one (1) Class "A" Triple Combina-
tion 1500 GPM Pumping Engine.
Bids must be filed with the City Clerk, at 129 East First Avenue, prior to
1:00 p.m. on August 17, 1984 at which time they will be publicly opened in
the Council Chambers of the City Hall, Shakopee, Minnesota.
Bidding forms and specifications may be obtained from the City Clerk's office.
Bids must be filed in accordance with the specifications of the City.
A certified check, cashier's check or bid bond in the amount of ten percent
(10%) of the total bid must accompany each proposal as a guarantee that if
the bid is accepted, the bidder will enter into contract and furnish a performance
bond in the full amount of the contract.
The City is not subject to State or Federal taxes.
The City of Shakopee will furnish the successful bidder with any applicable
-LAW _ax0peticl--..ceTtiiLsets
Bids must be submitted in a sealed envelope marked "Bids for Fire Apparatus
and Equipment", and the name and address of the bidder.
The City reserves the right to alter or change specifications and to reject
any or all bids received or to waiver any informality in the bidding.
All contacts with City officials from the time this bid is let until a bid
is awarded shall be through the Assistant Fire Chief Charles Ries (Truck Committee
Chairman). No exceptions to this will be tolerated.
Definitions
"The City" as used in these specifications shall refer to the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, and the "Chief of Fire Department" shall refer to the Chief of
sue- ir�"�elra�z�e --or-saia viiCy df snzfK6pee, Minne's'ota. -ine'F-ire`iepartment"
shall refer to the Shakopee Fire Department.
-1-
-! -yn,
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
TRIPLE COMBINATION PUMPING ENGINE
INTENT OF SPECIFICATIONS
It is the intent of these specifications to cover the furnishing and delivery
to the purchaser a complete apparatus equipped as hereinafter specified.
With a view to obtaining the best results and the most acceptable apparatus
for service in the Fire Department, these specifications cover only the general
requirements as to the type of construction and tests to which the apparatus
must conform, together with certain details as to finish, equipment and appliances
with which the successful bidder must conform. Minor details of construction
and materials where not otherwise specified are left to the discretion of
the contractor, who shall be solely responsible for the design and construction
of all features. The National Fire Protection Pamphlet 1901 for Motor Fire
Apparatus, unless otherwise specified in these specifications, shall prevail.
Bids will only be considered from companies which have an established reputation
in the field of fire apparatus construction and have been in business for
a minimum of 20 years.
Each bidder shall furnish satisfactory evidence of his ability to construct
the apparatus specified, and shall state the location of the factory where
the apparatus is to be built. He shall also show that he is in a position
to render prompt service and to furnish replacement parts for said apparatus.
Each bid shall be accompanied by a set of "Contractor"s Specifications" consisting
of a detailed description of the apparatus and equipment proposed and to which
the apparatus furnished under contract must conform. Computer run-off sheets
are not acceptable as descriptive literature.
These specifications shall indicate size, type, model and make of all component
parts and equipment.
BOTH CHASSIS AND BODY MUST BE BUILT IN AMERICA OR BID WILL BE REJECTED IMMEDIATELY
WITH NO FURTHER EXPLANATION GIVEN OR REQUIRED.
QUALITY AND WORKMANSHIP
The design of the apparatus must embody the latest approved automotive engineering
practices.
The workmanship must be of the highest quality in its respective field. Special
consideration will be given to the following points: accessibility of the
various units which require periodic maintenance operations, ease of operation
(including both pumping and driving) and symmetrical proportions.
Construction must be rugged and ample safety factors must be provided to carry
loads as specified and to meet both on an off road requirements and speed
conditions as set forth under "Performance Tests and Requirements".
-2-
Welding shall not be employed in the assembly of the apparatus in a manner
that will prevent the ready removal of any component part far serni.ce ar
repair.
WARRANTY
We warrant each new piece of fire and rescue apparatus and the equipment supplied
by this manufacturer with the apparatus for one year beyond delivery unless
warranted specifically for a longer period of time.
This warranty is in lieu of
other representations as to
or liabilities, including
on the part of the company.
DELIVERY
all other warranties, expressed or implied, all
the original purchaser and all other obligations
liability for incidental or consequential damage
Apparatus, to insure proper break in of all components while still under warranty,
SHALL BE DELIVERED UNDER ITS OWN POWER - rail or truck freight is not acceptable.
A qualified delivery engineer representing the contractor shall deliver the
apparatus and remain in the City a sufficient length of time to instruct the
Fire Department personnel in the proper operation, care and maintenance of
the equipment delivered. Apparatus to be delivered directly from manufacturer
to Shakopee without any other mileage other than necessary for testing.
Information Required
The manufacturer must supply, at time of delivery, at least two copies of
a complete operation and maintenance manual covering the completed apparatus
as delivered.
PERFORMANCE TESTS AND REQUIREMENTS
A road test will be conducted with the apparatus fully loaded
and a continuous
G i�$' mc�ie un'd2�zvitrg_C�`Yiuiiz�[rs; taui'iTi$
;I ' - --
� \ 1 V T 1CtZl b - Or-,Uo C~Q-1.L
`—
me the apparatus shall show no loss of power or overheating. The
which tii
;ion drive shaft or shafts, and rear axles shall run quietly and be
transmise
a abnormal vibration or noise throughtout the operating range of the
free froi
;. The apparatus, when loaded, shall have not less than 25% nor more
apparatus
of the weight on the front axle, and not less than 60% nor more than
than 40%
ie rear axle. The successful bidder shall furnish a weight certificate
75% on tl
weights on front axle, rear axle, and total weight for the completed
showing i
at time of delivery.
apparatus ;
pparatus must be capable of accelerating to 35 mph from a standing
A. The a
within 25 seconds on a level concrete highway without exceeding
start
aximum governed rpm of the engine.
the m;
,ervice brakes shall be capable of stopping fully loaded vehicle
B. The :
least 30 feet at 20 mph on level concrete highway.
in at
-3-
C. The apparatus, fully loaded, shall be capable of obtaining a speed of
not less than 60 miles per hour on a level concrete highway with the
engine not exceeding its governed rpm (full load).
D. The apparatus shall be tested and approved by the Underwriters Laboratories
Incorporated in accordance with their standard practices for pumping
engines.
E. The contractor shall furnish copies of the Pump Manufacturer's Certification
of Hydrostatic Test, the Engine Manufacturer's current Certified Brake
Horsepower curve, and the Manufacturer's Record of Pumper Construction
Details when delivered.
F. The apparatus shall be so designed that the various parts are readily
accessible for lubrication, inspection, adjustment, and repair of electrical
and mechanical systems.
The vendor, at his expense, shall have the Underwriters Laboratories Incorporated
conduct the tests required by the Underwriters Laboratories Incorporated (Guide
for Certification of Fire Department Pumper Subject 822 dated May, 1956, or
latest). A copy of all tests shall accompany the apparatus.
FAILURE TO MEET TEST
In the event the apparatus fails to meet the test requirements of these speci-
fications on the first trials, second trials may be made at the option of
the bidder within thirty (30) days of the date of the first trials. Such
trials shall be final and conclusive and failure to comply with these requirements
shall be cause for rejection. Failure to comply with changes as the purchaser
may consider necessary to conform to any clause of the specifications within
thirty (30) days after notice is given to the bidder of such changes shall
also be cause for rejection of the apparatus. Permission to keep or store
the apparatus in any building owned or occupied by the purchaser or its use
by the Fire Department during the above specified period with the permission
of the bidder shall not constitute acceptance.
EAi�.i+1�`i
The bidder, if his bid is accepted shall defend any and all suits and assume
all liability for the use of any patented process, device or article forming
a part of the apparatus or any appliance furnished under the contract.
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION
The apparatus shall be designed and the equipment mounted with due consideration
to distribution of load between the front and rear axles, so that all specified
equipment, including filled water tank, a full complement of personnel and
fire hose will be carried without injury to the apparatus. Weight balance
and distribution shall be in accordance with the recommendations of the Inter-
national Association of Fire Chiefs and National Fire Protection Association
-4-
(or American Insurance Association) . Underwriters Laboratories Certification
shall be submitted by the manufacturer.
The apparatus shall comply with all applicable state motor vehicle laws.
EXCEPTIONS TO SPECIFICATIONS
The following chassis, pump and body specifications shall be strictly adhered
to. Exceptions will be allowed if they are equal to or superior to that specified
and provided they are listed and fully explained ona separate page entitled
"EXCEPTIONS TO SPECIFICATIONS". Exception list to refer to specification
page number and paragraph. Said equality and/or superiority of exceptions
to the specifications is to be determined ultimately by the Shakopoee Fire
Department. In addition, bidders shall check (/) each and every paragraph
in the appropriate column provided on the right hand edge of paper as to compliance
or non-compliance with specifications. Each check in the "NO" column must
be listed and fully explained as described above in the "Exceptions to Specifi-
cations". Where no check is made at a particular paragraph either "Yes" or
"No" it will be assumed the bidder is taking exception to that paragraph.
PROPOSALS TAKING TOTAL EXCEPTION TO SPECIFICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
Apparatus will be inspected upon delivery for compliance with specifications.
Deviations will not be tolerated and will be cause for rejection of apparatus
unless they were originally listed in bidder's proposal.
-5-
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
BID REQUIREMENTS
Yes
No
Each bid to be accompanied by a Bid Bond, certified check or cash
in the amount of 10% of bid price. Bid Bond to be furnished by
company who will build the apparatus proposed. Bid Bonds by salesmen
or agents of the manufacturer are not acceptable. Bids must remain
firm for a period of 30 days. An exception to this requirement
will not be tolerated.
'£Yxe s -access€ -a1 bil&4e1 s17all €uznis'n a 190M Performance bond within
30 days after notification of award of contract. Performance Bond
to be furnished by company who will build the apparatus proposed.
Performance Bond by salesmen or agents of the manufacturer are
not acceptable. An exception to this requirement will not be tol-
erated!
The completed truck shall be delivered no more than ten (10) months
after the bid is awarded.
Bid proposals must be submitted in the same sequence as specifica-
tions for ease of checking compliance to same. An exception to
this requirement will not be tolerated.
Bidders to use forms attached for questionnaires. Questionnaire
must be returned with proposal, No Exceptions.
APPROVAL DRAWINGS
A blueprint must be approved by the Fire Department prior to any
metal being sheared or cut for the unit. The Fire Department,
the Dealer and the Apparatus Manufacturer shall each have a copy
of this blue print. This blue print shall then become a part of
the total contract.
Drawing must show, but not limited to such items as the Chassis
being utilized, lights, horns, sirens, all compartment locations
and dimensions, special discharges, etc. In actuality this blue
print is to be a visual interpretation of the unit as it is to
be supplied.
In addition to this questionnaire/ form, each bidder must submit
a detailed proposal. A letter only, even though written on company
letterhead, is not sufficient and will be cause for rejection.
We must be able to study, evaluate and compare. An exception
to this requirement will not be tolerated.
-6-
Y Irk-_
T '�t-
SPECIFICATIONS
('0 WDT T V 0
CHASSIS - GENERAL Yes
No
Chassis to be a new, heavy duty tilt type custom fire appartus
chassis and all standard components not specified shall be furnished.
The chassis to be manufactured at, by and in the apparatus body
builders facility so as to eliminate split responsibility. The
chassis to be that manufacturers first line four or five man tilt
cab custom chassis.
The chassis shall be designed and manufactured for heavy duty service,
with adequate strength and capacity for all components, for the
intended load to be sustained and the type of service required.
Chassis shall be a cab forward custom built Fire Trunk with GVW
rating not less than 37,180# and wheelbase of 182" to 184". Within
these categories, the following specific items shall be included:
AXLES
Front to be a Reverse Elliot "I" beam type with inclined king pins.
A Rockwell Model with a minimum rated capactity of 14,600 pounds.
Turning angle of approximately 37 degress or more.
The rear axle to be a Rockwell Model with a minimum capacity of
24,000 pounds at the hub. The single reduction differential to
have appropriate ratio to allow a top speed of at least 60 mph.
BRAKES
The service brake system is to be full air type by Rockwell -Standard.
Brakes to be a minimum disc 16-1/2" x 5", at front to meet vehicle
demand, and a minimum 16-1/2" x 7" rear, cam operated. The system
is to meet or exceed current FMVSS-121 requirements. Other components
or accessories are to be as follows:
- Minimum 16 CFM air compressor. -
- Bendix Westinghouse E-7 dual brake treadle valve.
- Three (3) Air reservoirs - air tank capacity for entire system
shall not be less than 3600 cubic inches. Air tanks shall
have easy access for manual drain.
- Bendix Westinghouse AD -2 dryer with heated automatic moisture
ejector.
- Minimum 30 square inch rear chambers.
- One (1) air gauge on cab dash with dual needles, red warning
light and buzzer. _
- Nylon brake lines wrapped in loom. e^
-7-
—
BIDDE-R---
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
SPECIFICATIONS
Yes
No
A quick attach air chuck with check valve in chuck and a second
check valve 1-1/2 feet back from chuck in line to be installed
inside of drivers door on side of step. This will be connected
to vehicle air .system to boost the system when truck is parked.
The Anchorloc parking brake system is to be the spring set type
operated by B -W PP -1 control valve. Brake indicator light is also
to be provided. A B -W SR -1 valve which will allow operation of
the spring brake should the rear brake system lose its air is to
be provided.
CAB
The cab is to be designed specifically for the fire service and
manufactured by the chassis builder. To provide extra carrying
capacity but yet maintain a smooth ride the cab is to be built
out of ALUMINUM OR STAINLESS STEEL (#304). The cab sheet metal
is to be 1/8" aluminum welded to extruded aluminum framing. Cab
to have at least 4 -point rubber mounting and tilted by a hand operated
hydraulic pump connected to two (2) cab lift cylinders. A 2 -point
automatic cab lock is to be provided. The cab is to be at least
88" wide inside. A four way adjustable drivers and companion
passenger seat to be provided in the cab for a minimum of two fire
fighters. Under the rear canopy a 25" wide seating area to be
provided at each side of engine housing to comfortably accommodate
two more passengers. Overall cab height to be 97". Overall apparatus
height shall not exceed 114" at any part.
Curved, tinted, safety glass windshields to have over at least
2500 square inches of viewing area. Two powerful electric wipers
with individual controls to be provided. Deluxe Vel Vac stainless
steel mirrors with 6-1/2" x 10" flat and 6" x 6-1/2" convex section
to mounted one each side on cab doors. Two sliding rear windows
to be furnished to allow visual and audio communication with canopy
passengers.
Seat belts, an oversize 46,000 BTU fresh air heater and defroster
with two speed blower and temperature control and seven auxiliary
lights to be provided. A courtesy step light at each cab door;
a light module above center windshield post with two adjustable
map lights and a dome light; and two canopy dome lights to be furnished.
Cab dome and step lights to be controlled by automatic door switches.
Two (2) engine compartment lights to be installed under engine
hood.
A padded, sound absorbing cab dash to be provided with the same
material installed on the inside door panels and cab and canopy
headliner. Seat upholstery to be black and also the interior painted
metal surfaces.
-8-
q, 'K"
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
Cab access step is to be inside the door, not subject to the weather
outside. An 18" handrail is to be provided adjacent to door openings
for assistance., The cab doors are to be extra wide (35" nominal)
and high (65") for ease of entry. Thereare to be double automotive
type rubber seals around the perimeter of the door to insure a
weather tight fit. The doors are to be constructed of aluminum
or stainless steel (#304) and conventional roll down window. A
flush mounted chrome plated paddle type door handle to be provided
on the exterior of door and a latch type handle on the inside to
operate the opening mechanism. Nylon web type door stops to be
provided. Door hinge to be a stainless steel piano type with 1/4"
pin.
Entry to the canopy to be aided by a stainless steel handrail at
each entrance.
Cab instruments and controls to be located on the cab dash. Gauges
and emergency vehicle switches to be installed on removable panels
for ease of service. The following gauges and controls to be fur-
nished:
All controls & gauges to be labeled
er cable, mechanical type
mechanical type
re gauge with red warning light and buzzer
re gauge with red warning light and buzzer
re gauge with dual needles, red warning
i
Lssion oil temperature red warning light
rith green indicator light
;2
Sutton or switch
;ter controls
.f canceling turn signal switches!
and washer controls
-control
.tc pane
-ed and green indicator lights
switch Cole Hersee - green
�n dash
itrol - red indicator light on dash
.ssion shift tower
inter of steering wheel for dual electric
ies, and lights to be identified as to function
s) adjacent to item. Actuation of headlight
e ("back -lite"), federally required words for
-9-
Yes
----SpeeaometerIodometi
Tachometer cable, i
Engine oil pressu:
Engine temperatu
One M air pressu;
light and buzzer
Voltmeter
utomatic transm:
and buzzer
Ignition switch
Starter buttons
Engine shutdown t
Heater and defros
Headlight and sel
Windshield wiper
Warning ilght swl
Pump shift with x
Battery selector—
indicator
e ectorindicator light c
Parking brake cor
Automatic transmi
----Torn button at ce
horns
Dash controls, switcl
by imprinted word (
switch to illuminat
BIDDER
SPECIFICATION COMP
after dark operation. Turn signal and high beam headlight indicators Yes No
are also to be provided. All light and word identification opf
same does not show up unless it is necessary. Built-in emergency
light switch panel to have a master switch plus individual switches
for selective control. Switches to be rocker type with integral
indicator light.
A records compartment to be installed on the right side of cab
dash. It is to measure at least 16" wide x 10`° high x 6-1/2"
deep at bottom.
The cab and canopy floors are to be aluminum treadplate. A forward
drop down portion of the headliner is to be provided to allow access i
to all possible cab roof wiring. Full circular inner fenders in i
*he LchQa�_ -u-J i , Q�nnr, -a:G in-�_ hs-. *lxAfvL
A band of patterned stainless steel trim to be placed across the
front of the cab. A bright metal trim strip to be installed on
each cah side. Cab wirdshieLd to bane hr-L%ht trim ie, the.
rubber molding holding the glass in place. Stainless steel scuffplates
to be provided to protect the paint finish at the cab door entrances.
UIT-L-oaae=teLroareLLeb LV UV ursLdrraa-aL all wneea openings. i
Two (2) Grover air horns to be mounted on roof of cab outside of
^�
light bar on each side with pull cord activator to be accessible
to both driver and officer.
Mud flaps are to be installed for front wheels. Mud flap mounting
brackets to be continuously welded with no holes to penetrate cab
and fenders to prevent corrosion.
ENGINE
The chassis to be powered by a Detroit Diesel Engine as described
below with the following minimum specifications:
Model (6v 92ta)
Number of Cylinders (SIX)
Bore and Stroke 4.84" x (FIVE)"
Displacement -cubic inches 552
Rate BHP 330 at 2100 RPM
Torque 963 at 1200 RPM
LZTaip2'eS�tVt1-iCSl1V - -r! "Lti - L
Governed RPM Full load 2250
Standard equipment on the engine to include the following:
-10-
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPI, ES
Yes
No
Air cleaner - Farr w/air inlet (Engine air intake to draw
with built-in soft suction hose tray for 25' of 6" soft suction
from outside of engine compartment
polyster jacket and rubber line built in tool box.
Air compressor - Minimum 16 CFM
FUEL SYSTEM
Exhaust ,- single with discharge right side, ahead of rear
A fifty gallon fuel tank to be provided and mounted at rear of
wheels
chassis. The tank to be constructed of 12 gauge, hot rolled,
_
Dual fuel filters with check valve
pickled in oil, steel. It is to be equipped with swash partition
Governor - limiting speed/variable s eed
and vent. A 2-1/2" diameter fill inlet to be located on driver's
_
Injectors - cam operated, unit type, clean tip
side of body and covered with a hinged, spring loaded, stainless
Lube oil cooler
steel door. Door marked "Diesel Fuel Only".
Lube oil filter - full flow
1/2" drain plug to be installed in lowest point of tank.
Starting motor 12 volt
-11-
Turbocharger
Engine hood to be constructed of aluminum. External surfaces are
to be 4 -way pattern treadplate. Hood sides and top to be double
panel construction with heat and sound deadening insulation.
Engine hood compartment to follow contours of engine in order to
provide greater area in the jump seats.
FRAME
The chassis frame is to be built with two steel channels bolted
to five cross members. The side rails to be of heat treated steel
measuring at least 10" x 3" x 5/16" with at least 5 crossmembers.
Each rail to have a section modulus of at least 12.99, a yield
strength of at least 110,000 PSI and a resisting bending moment
of 1,428,900 pounds.
A one piece stainless steel bumper, 10 inches high, to be attached
to the front of the frame. A 7" formed steel channel to be mounted
directly behind bumper for additional strength. Two (2) cast steel
_I__ L_L�--...I ..1...-...1 _. _11_A -,4- �.. —A �Yt�r}e ori
LCJw, LLUUKS Lu uc CILLULLIC it Ytal.cu ... -c --v— _ .. �...... �.. .--
to front frame members. Front bumper extended 16" ahead of cab
with built-in soft suction hose tray for 25' of 6" soft suction
polyster jacket and rubber line built in tool box.
FUEL SYSTEM
A fifty gallon fuel tank to be provided and mounted at rear of
chassis. The tank to be constructed of 12 gauge, hot rolled,
pickled in oil, steel. It is to be equipped with swash partition
and vent. A 2-1/2" diameter fill inlet to be located on driver's
side of body and covered with a hinged, spring loaded, stainless
steel door. Door marked "Diesel Fuel Only".
1/2" drain plug to be installed in lowest point of tank.
-11-
i
SPECIFICATIONS
BIDDER
with a heavy duty
volt 225 amp hour
rating. Batteries
ree batteries will
selector switch is
wo starter buttons
H.D. Delco starter
Copy cab preferably
nts constructed of
loor. Front panel
•tment to be well
Alternator to be a minimum of 165 amp equipped
regulator.
Starting system to be dual utilizing two (2) 12
minimum batteries with 1115 CCA @ 0 degrees F
will be of high cycling type and maintenace f
not be accepted. A Cole Hersee M-705 battery
to be installed in cab. Ignition switch and t
to be located on cab dash. Buttons wired to two
solenoids. Batteries mounted at entrance to cat
both on one side of truck. Battery compartme
aluminum treadplate with hinged top opening c
of compartment is also to be removable. Compai
-12-
VV1'11
LtliJ
Electric fuel pump to be located at tank and capable of self priming
Yes
No
entire fuel system.
Fuel line to exit from top of tank with inlet of line at bottom
of tank at lowest point.
COOLING SYSTEM
A tube and fin type radiator with removable upper and lower tanks
is to be provided. The top tank to have a deaeration device built
in. Drain cocks to be located at the lowest point.
The cooling system of the engine shall be adequate to maintain
f
the temperature of the coolant in the engine not in excess of the
engine manufacturer's maximum temperature rating. The square inch
area of the radiator shall be a minimum of 1000 square inches.
The system shall be equipped with a spin on coolant conditioner.
A supplementary heat exchange cooling system shall be provided
The radiator shall be so mounted as not to develop leaks due to
ordinary running and operation. The construction shall be such
that the radiator will not corrode nor readily clog. Air operated
automatic radiator shutters shall be furnished and viscious fan
drive. The cooling system shall be protected to -25 degrees
Fahrenheidt. A heavy duty fan is to be provided. Air intake to
radiator to be located at bottom of cab, ahead of radiator.
DRIVELINES
Drivelines are to have a heavy duty metal tube and be equipped
=with 1730 series 5vi.rits. TYie s'nafts are to be
is to be provided.
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
with a heavy duty
volt 225 amp hour
rating. Batteries
ree batteries will
selector switch is
wo starter buttons
H.D. Delco starter
Copy cab preferably
nts constructed of
loor. Front panel
•tment to be well
Alternator to be a minimum of 165 amp equipped
regulator.
Starting system to be dual utilizing two (2) 12
minimum batteries with 1115 CCA @ 0 degrees F
will be of high cycling type and maintenace f
not be accepted. A Cole Hersee M-705 battery
to be installed in cab. Ignition switch and t
to be located on cab dash. Buttons wired to two
solenoids. Batteries mounted at entrance to cat
both on one side of truck. Battery compartme
aluminum treadplate with hinged top opening c
of compartment is also to be removable. Compai
-12-
q,✓
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
ventilated. Heavy duty battery cables to be used to provide maximum
Yes
No
power to the electrical system. Cables to be coded with colored
tape and run in automotive type loom. Cables and batteries shall
be labeled A or,B corresponding to its respective position on the
Cole Hersee switch mounted in the cab.
A battery isolator connected to the above mentioned batteries shall
be mounted inside the compartment under the speed lays on drivers
side of truck.
All 12 volt wiring to be SXL crosslink type automatic circuit breaker
protected, run in a braided, high temperature, vinyl coated nylon
yard jacket and number and color coded. Wiring connectors to be
machine crimped to wiring for trouble free service. All possible
solenoids, relays, terminal blocks, and circuit breakers to be
located in an easily accessible compartment at center of cab dash.
The inside of compartment door to have both a wiring layout printed
on a metal plate and a complete index of wiring.
Exterior cab lighting to meet or exceed Federal Department of Trans-
poration, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, and National
Fire Protection Association requirements in effect at time of proposal.
Front headlights are to be quad type mounted in polished stainless
steel housings with bulbs of the powerful halogen type. Front
turn signals to be amber arrow design with chrome trim. Five pedestal
type clearance and marker lights are to be installed across the
leading edge of the cab.
STEERING
Integral heavy duty power steering with hydraulic pump. A padded
steering wheel, 20" in diameter to be provided.
SUSPENSION
Front springs to be semi -elliptical, and a minimum 3.5" x 5111,
10 leaf, constant rate type. Heavy duty telescoping Magnum shock
absorbers are also to be provided.
Rear springs are also to be semi -elliptical, and a minimum 3" x
50" with 15 leaf main and 6 leaf auxiliary. Spring hangers to
be weldments with provision for lubrication (all grease fittings
to be 90 degree type for ease of service). Top two leaves to wrap
the forward spring hanger pin and top leaf only to wrap rear spring
hanger pin on both front and rear suspension.
-13-
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
All springs to be alloy steel. Front springs ground rated at least
yes
No
14,400 lbs. and rear 27,000 lbs. minimum.
TIRES & WHEELS
Front tires to be ll.00R 20XZA 14 ply with highway tread. Rear
tires to be ll.00R20 M + S4 14 ply with M + S4 REAR DUALS tread.
Wheels to be 8 x 20" Alcoa cast aluminum if capable of meeting
the load requirements for this apparatus, 10 stud with 11-1/4"
bolt circle.
TRANSMISSION
An Allison 4 or 5 speed torque converting automatic transmission
to be provided. Shift module to be mounted to right of driver
on console. Shift position indicator to be indirectly lit for
after dark operation. A transmission temperature gauge with red
light and buzzer to be installed on cab dash. A fourth gear lockup
to be provided to hold transmission in direct drive for pump operation.
WHEELBASE
The wheelbase of the chassis to be 182" to 188".
PUMP
Pump shall be a Waterous 1500 gpm single stage midship mounted
centrifugal type, two short neck pump manifolds for 6" side suctions.
Pump shall be the Class "A" type and shall deliver the percentage
of rated discharge at pressure indicated below.
100% of rated capacity at 150 PSI net pump pressure
70% of rated capacity at 200 PSI net pump pressure
50 of rated capacity at 250 PSI net pump pressure
Pump, when dry shall be capable of taking suction and discharging
water with a lift of 10 feet in not more than 30 seconds through
20 feet of suction hose of the appropriate size.
-14-
T
SPECIFICATIONS BIDDER
CCThfPT TFC
Pump casing shall be close grained gray iron, bronze fitted and
Yes
No
horizontally split in two sections for easy removal of entire impeller
assembly, including wear rings, without disturbing setting of pump
in chassis or pump piping.
All impellers shall be bronze, accurately balanced for
vibration - free running. The impellers must_ have flame
_plated
impeller hubs in order to reduce the wear of the hub. Pumps without
this feature will not be acceptable. Impeller shaft to be stainless
steel, accurately ground to size and polished under packings.
Shaft to be supported at each end by ball type oil. or grease lubricated
bearings. Sleeve bearings or bushings will not be acceptable.
Bearings to be protected from water and sediment by stuffing boxes
ateach end of impeller shaft. The packing is to be all graphite
and self lubricating. Asbestos type packing will be not accepted.
Packing to be held in place by split, bronze glands which are fully
removable and adjustable. Replaceable bronze wear rings to be
provided.
The pump, for ease and rapid servicing in the future, must have
the Waterous separable impeller shaft which allows true separtion
of transmission or pump without dissembly or disturbing the other
component.
Pump or transmission can be repaired independently. No exceptions
will be accepted.
This feature will allow field service to be accomplished in much
less time since each component (pump or transmission) can be repaired
independently. Disassemly of the pump when the transmission requires
service or vice versa is not required. No exceptions will be accepted.
PUMP TRANSMISSION - Housing to behigh tensile gray iron, three
pieces, horizontally split. Power transfer to pump to be through
a Morse HY-VO drive chain. Chain to be pressure lubricated through
oil pump. Oil pressure gauge to be provided on pump panel. Chain
sprockets to be cut from carburized, hardened alloy steel. Spur
gears will not be acceptable.
Drive shafts are to be a minimum of 2" diameter hardened and ground
alloy steel. All shafts shall be ball bearing supported. Case
to be designed to eliminate the need of water cooling. Pump shift
engagement to be made by a two position sliding collar controlled
electrically from cab with manual override on pump panel. To the
left of the electric pump shift in the cab shall be two indicator
lights to positively show position of pump. When switch is moved
to pump position, a green light shall come on indicating pump is
-1.5-
x
,m -
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
in gear. If pump does not engage when switch is in pump position
Yes
No
a red flashing light shall come on. Another green indicator light
shall be installed adjacent to hand throttle on pump panel. This
light also is to indicate that pump is in gear. Light shall be
labelled "WARNING: DO NOT OPEN THROTTLE UNLESS LIGHT IS ON".
PRESSURE CONTROL - A Waterous adjustable relief value, specially
designed for fire service, shall be provided. Valve shall be positive
and quick acting and have instantaneous on-off control. When in
the off position the relief valve shall functionally be removed
from the system. When turned back on it shall again monitor and
maintain the pressure the relief valve was set at the last time
it was used. Control for adjusting pressure to be elliptical shaped
for positive grip: wheel control not acceptable. An easily removable
pilot valve strainer shall be provided and be accessible from
pump operators panel. A flush system will be provided for both
the pilot valve and relief valve piped underneath truck with easy
access. Flush valve controls will be accessible from the lower
right hand corner of the pump panel and will be appropriatly labeled.
Indicator lights (two) shall be furnished to show position of relief
valve - open or closed. Engine governor type pressure regulator
will not be acceptable.
PRIMING DEVICE - Priming pump shall be a Waterous electrically
driven, positive displacement, rotary type, with single quick action
control on pump panel. The "T" handle control, when pulled, is
to automatically open the priming valve and activate the primer
motor at the same time, thus being a one hand operation. Primer
valve is to be connected to the top of pump volute. If a front
suction is supplied an additional line is to be connected to the
highest point or points between the pump and the inlet thus insuring
a complete prime. Primer shall be automatically lubricated from
large (4 quart minimum) oil reservoir. Priming pump shall be built
by the manufacturer of the fire pump.
AUXILIARY COOLING SYSTEM - A supplementry heat exchange system
shall be installed to permit use of water from the discharge side
of the fire pump for cooling of water circulating through the engine
cooling system. Heat exchanger to be of brass construction and
shall be a separate unit installed in pump compartment with valve
control on operator's panel. An emergency radiator refill line
so labeled shall also be provided with control accessible from
pump panel.
OPERATOR'S CONTROL PANEL - All pump controls and gauges to be located
at left side of apparatus and properly marked. Pump panel controls
and gauges to be illuminated by one (1) fluorescent light equipped
with a full length polished stainless steel shield. Another light
identical to this is to be installed on pump panel or passenger
side of truck above the discharges. Both gauges and controls to
-16-
lF y'„"
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
be mounted on a black vinyl covered steel panel to allow easy identi-
Yes
No
fication of controls and gauges and to eliminate glare. Right
side pump panel to also be black vinyl. Pump panels on both sides
are to be easily removable. This black vinyl material is to be
purchased from the steel company with the vinyl bonded on when
delivered on the apparatus manufacturer. Pump panel controls and
guages shall beheated separately by an auxiliary heater with on
and off switch on pump panel and individual gauge heaters similar
to M.C. Product Automatic Gauges heating unit with sensor unit
mounted on pump panel.
All line pressure gauges to be mounted in individual chrome plated
casting approximately 5" high x 4-1/4" wide with identification
label installed in the recess area below gauge. Line gauges to
be a minimum of 3-1/2" for easy reading. These gauges to be of
the compound type and display PSI.
The master gauges, both vacuum and pump pressure, shall be a minimum
of 6" diameter. Identification labels to be installed in gauge.
As with the line gauges these are to be of the compound type display
and PSI.
Gauge and control panel to be two separate panels for ease of main-
tenance. Polished stainless steel trim collars to be installed
around all suction inlet and discharge outlets. All. push-pull
discharge controls to have stainless steel rods - minimum of 1/2"
diameter. Push-pull discharge controls to pull straight out of
panel. Controls which pull out at an angle will not be acceptable.
{
Guides for remote push-pull discharge controls to be a chrome plated
casting securely attached to pump panel behind the panel with identi-
fication label installed in recessed area of casting above control.
This casting to be approximately 3" high x 3" wide. This casting
to also act as a guide for the push-pull control rods. Remote
control push-pull discharge rods to be equipped with universal
joints to eliminate binding. All gauges to be directly above its
corresponding discharge valve actuating handle. This is to insure
easy and fast identification of proper discharge gauge/handle.
Individual discharge I.D. tags are required. They shall be mounted
in a recessed area on a chrome plated casting approximately 1"
high x 2-1/4" wide securely attached to the pump panel with a self
locking device on the back side of the panel. Controls and gauges
for convenient operation, shall be as follows:
-17-
I
__v_
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
All discharge controls
Yes
No
Vernier engine throttle (N -W Control) with pump in gear
light
Relief valve control with indicator lights
Primer control
Tank fill and recirculating line
Tank to pump control
- Manual pump shift override control
Pressure gauge 30"-0-600# - 6" diameter
Vacuum gauge 30"-0-600# - 6" diameter
All discharge outlets, gauges and corresponding
actuating handles
All discharges capable of foam shall be additionally
identified as such
Water level gauge to be color coded
Engine oil pressure guage
Engine water temperature gauge
Pump transmission oil pressure gauge
Water tank gauge - electric 5 -light type, manufactured
by the bidder
Tachometer - Mechanical type (electric not acceptable)
Underwriters half engine speed outlet
Master pump drain control
Individual pressure gauges for all 2-1/2" discharges -
30"-0-600# 3-1/2" diameter
NOTE: BIDDER MUST CHECK EACH OF THE ABOVE ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY
TO INDICATE THEY ARE SUPPLYING OR NOT SUPPLYING THEM.
-18-
5-
BIDDER
COMPLIES
SPECIFICATIONS
Provide drains for front suction at lowest point of front bumper
Yes
No
and lowest point before suction side of pump. Note, this is to
be double drained. All drains to be extended to outside of truck.
DISCHARGE OUTLETS - Six 2-1/2" outlet(s) with quarter turn push-pull
type discharge valves are installed behind panel. - none on left
c'
side of vehicle, two on right side, two at rear of hose bedtwo,
to supply speed lays in crew cab area. Side discharge valves to
be Waterous section gear to insure constant operating force at
any valve position. All 2-1/2" outlets are controlled from pump
panel and are lockable in any position. Each 2-1/2" hose discharge
has individual 3/4" push-pull drain valve (Elkhart No. 110) with
control adjacent to outlet. Drain valve to be recessed behind
panel with push pull control extended through the panel. Water
to drain below chassis frame. All outlets are male and capped
with 2-1/211 chrome plated female cap with 30 degree chrome elbows
and retaining chain. Except speed lays. Rear 2-1/2" outlets will
be (1) R.H. side. (1) L.H. side with controls on pump panel.
A 3" outlet for deck gun to be located in center of truck in forward
section of pump compartments to provide easy operation by standing
on bench seat above speed lays (see print). One 3" outlet to deck
gun with 3" valve controlled from pump panel.
One (1) Stang 03600 portable truck mounted nozzle turret with Stang
PN B101371-12 Siamese 3 clappered 2-1/2" in female inlet with Stang
PN B103400-1 pressure gauge barrel mounted with detachable stream
shaper, PN D100292-1 2-1/2" NH female X 2-1/2" N11 male X 1.2" long
stainless, polished pressure guage to be glyserin filled. This
is to be installed in a manner that it can be manned while truck
mounted or removed to ground. All piping will be such that a flow
capacity of at least 1200 gpm may be obtained with a maximum of
5 psi friction lost at 1200 gpm.
Actuator valve handle for this deckgun shall be located on pump
panel with associated pump panel mounted pressure gauge of the
same style as the other discharge pressure gauges and arranged
with the valve handle in the same fashion as other discharges.
1 - 5" outlet on rear mtd center with no less than 3-1/2" gate
valve panel control with storz and blind cap 5" with 30 degree
elbow and retaining chain will flow pump capacity with no more
than 5 psi friction loss at rear of truck.
1 - 5" outlet on R.H. side panel control with no less than 3-1/2"
gate valve with storz and blind cap 5" with 30 degrees elbow and
with flow pump capacity with no more than 5 psi friction.
-20-
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
All pressure and compound gauges to be glyserin fill compound type.
Yes
No
Gauge face to be white with black lettering.
When entire pump panel is complete a polished aluminum trim moulding
is to outline the black vinyl pump panel both sides and the gauge
panel.
PUMP PIPING - All suction and discharge line 2" or larger to have
heavy duty galvanized threaded pipe - sweat soldered cooper tubing
is not acceptable. Where vibration or chassis flexing may damage
or loosen piping or where a coupling is required for service, the
piping shall be equipped with victaulic or rubber couplings. All
lines to drain through either master drain valve or to be equipped
with individual drain valves. All individual drain lines are to
be extended, with rubber heater hose to drain below chassis frame.
All water carrying gauge lines are to be of flexible polypropylene
tubing to prevent breakage from vibration. All suction inlets
and discharge outlets to be equipped with National Standard Threads
(NST). Inlet and discharge connections to be as follows:
1 5" front suction with 6" NST end cap and chrome cap with panel
control open and close full flow valve
A 6" front suction with 5" piping minimizing 90 degree bends and
no flatening of pipe below the 5" diameter specified for this system.
Suction must be capable of flowing pump capacity with no more than
5 psi friction loss or less at capacity flow. Valve to be installed
at pump and actuated at pump panel.
1 - drain to be located at front bumper - 3/4"
INLETS - A 6" pump manifold inlet is provided on each side of
the vehicle with long handle chrome plated cap. These two inlets
shall each have two Akron 6" butterfly valves. One 2-1/211 gated
inlet(s) provided on each side of vehicle with female swivel connection
and chrome plated cap with retaining chain. The 2-1/211 inlet valves
are to be behind pump panel and the controls are to be on outside
the panel. These valves are to be Akron or Elkhart 1/4 turn.
Bleeder drain valve provided on gated inlet(s). All inlets have
removable strainers. Valve must be behind panel.
One suction line relief valve for suction side of pump to be installed
behind pump panel and to be operated at pump panel.
All discharge and suction inlets to have drains to outside side
of truck body labeled.
-19-
P.
SPECIFI
2 - 5" storz x 2-1/211 male N.S.T. with caps and retaining chain.
All blind caps to have retaining chain.
A weather proof switch will be installed by each discharge opening
which will activate an indicator light by the corresponding discharge
pressure gauge at the pump panel.
BOOSTER TANK shall be 750 gallon capacity, constructed of scaleless
pickled in oiled 10 gauge galvanneal or water tank steel. Tank
to be "T" shaped to provide for deepside compartmentsand to serve
as a large sump to limit the amount of undraftable water. Tank
to be of welded construction. All seams to be welded inside and
outside. All full length longitudinal formed corners are to have
1" radius unless corner is welded. Only top corner at side of
tank to be welded. "Inside" corner of tank ("T section) to be
reinforced at rear with "Boomerang" gusset each side. Tank to
be baffled in accordance with NFPA Bulletin 1901 requirements.
Baffles to be welded to 10T" shaped bar stock at sides and bottom
of tank. Where baffles cross they are to be gussetted with bar
stock. Cross baffles to be "V" shaped to allow for proper drainage.
A 8 x 14" rectangular fill dome to be located at front of tank,
drivers side and equipped with a hinged cover and screen. The
non-locking fill dome cover to have stainless steel hinge with
fold -down handle. A 4" diameter combination overflow and vent
to be installed in fill dome.
A removable cover for inspection and maintenance purposes shall
be provided in tank top. This cover must be large enough to afford
a man sufficient access to each compartment of the tank for cleaning
and inspection. Cover to have edges flanged down and in for rigidity
ges which are flanged down and out.
and seat into tank opening ed
Heavy rubber gasket to be installed between cover and tank to prevent
leakage. Cover to be held down by heavy clips bolted to tank top.
No holes are to be made in tank topor cover for fastening of the
removable cover. Cover to be reinforced with angle iron welded
to interior face.
After the water tank is completely fabricated and all holes, openings,
etc. have been made in the tank the interior shall be abrasive
blasted (chemical etching not acceptable) to a white metal (NACE
No.l, or SSPCSP 5-63) finish with a surface profile of 1/5 to 2.0
mils. Immediately after blasting the interior shall be coated
with GUARDIAN II barrior coat - an epoxy compound specially prepared
for water storage tanks in fire apparatus. An anode must be installed
in each water compartment in the booster tank for maximum protection.
Tank to be unconditionally (barring accident or abuse) guaranteed
for TEN YEARS provided the anodes are replaced five years after
acceptance of apparatus. Fire Department will purchase the anodes
-21-
COMPLIES
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
at this time from the tank manufacturer as proof of replacement.
Yes
No
Manufacturers offering "so called" "Life Time" anodes will not
be considered in the fact anodes are installed as a sacrificial
item.
Tank is to be mounted on specially prepared rubber liners placed
on top of chassis frame rails to prevent metal to metal contact.
Tank to be held down by spring loaded bolts at rear and a "slip
joint" bolt system at front. Entire tank to be readily removable
from body.
WATER LEVEL GAUGE - Water tank to be provided with an electric
water level indicator. Indicator to register by means of lights
the following positions: full, 3/4, 1/2, 1/4, and empty. Empty
light must start flashing to further alert pump operator when water
level drops below the 1/4 mark. Level gauge to be maaufatured
by the builder of the apparatus. Indicator lights to be installed
in a chrome die cast panel and mounted on pump panel. The bezel
for the water level gauge shall match the style of other bezels
used for the discharge control valves, name tags and pressure
gauges to present a more pleasing appearance of the pump panel.
PUMP TO TANK AND TANK FILL LINE Tank shall be connected to intake
side of pump with 2-3" heavy duty galvanized pipes and provided
with 1/4 turn 3" full flow line valves with one control rod on
pump panel. These supplylineswill be supplied with check valves
Rubber couplings to be provided in these lines to prevent damage
from vibration or chassis flexing. Tank to pump lines to run straight
from pump into front face of tank with 45 degree elbows at inlets
turned down into tank sump. Only one sweep elbow to be used in
tank to pump plumbing per supply line. Tank sump to be equipped
with anti -swirl device and a 3" cleanout plug at bottom. A 1-1/2"
combination tank refill and pump bypass line shalt be provided
with control on pump panel. Pump shall perform at 100% of its
rated specifications while drafting from tank.
HOSE BODY to be fabricated of 12 gauge GALVANNEAL steel. Sides
are not to form any portion of fender compartments. Hose body
assembly is to include installation of the operator's removable
control panel, pump inspection door on right hand side of pump
compartment and rear body stanchions for support of rear crossrail
and hose bed lights. Pump inspection door to be a minimum of 10"
x 10" constructed of stainless steel. Hose body width to be a
minimum of 70" inside. Upper and rear edges on side panels to
have a double break at top for rigidity split tubing finish not
acceptable. Side panels to have forward sloping stream -lined shape
at rear. Upper corners of rear beavertails are to be covered with
polished stainless steel to prevent damage to painted surface when
hose is removed. Hose capacity to be a minimum of 2000 feet of
2-1/2" double jacket hose and 1500 feet of 5" snap tite hose.
-22-
BIDDER I
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
Three hose bed partitions(s) provided for separating hose. Partitions
to be constructed of aluminum sheet with slotted aluminum extrusion
reinforcement welded along bottom and top and curved down at rear.
Partitions must be readily adjustable without drilling or tapping.
i�7i .:.:
lio 1r1u6t: U&ljrai �1 4J �i1S oil
a v2 u2Si ia4d u0 ,4� •d S 2
extruded aluminum brackets. When exact location is decided, by
tightening two bolts, front and rear, the divider can again be
relocated. All bolt ends in the hose bed to have acorn nuts to
prevent damage to hose. Removable slatted aluminum flooring to
be furnished in hose bed. Top surface of aluminum hose bed flooring
*-L hR rir_rm%a t it t cL a -;A in_ haste a..Pxaa-ians_ FLoar_inq, stats to be
Yes
a mini -mum or 1/.L- X -4-1/'F W1.1 -LI Jj6 5PdC11L6 UCL.WCCLL LVL 11Vb"- VULLLl-
lation.
RUNNING BOARDS, REAR STEP AND FENDERS - Running boards to be fabricated
of 1/8" aluminum treadplate and supported by structural steel angle
assemblies bolted to chasssis frame. Running boards to be approximately
13" deep to provide ample space for carrying accessory equipment.
Rear step to also be constructed of aluminum treadplate and supported
by a channel and angle assembly bolted to chassis frame. Step
to be full width of apparatus and 20" deep. Rear tow eye to be
installed direct to chassis frame inside rear compartment for ease
and safety in hooking up.
Both running board and rear step edges to be flanged down and in
to provide added strengh and rigidity and to prevent cutting of
hands while washing apparatus. Running boards to be flanged up
4" at pump panels to form kickplates. A full width aluminum threadplate
step, above rear step compartments, to be furnished for ease of
loading hose. Step to be a minimum of 10" deep. Four (4) steps
to be installed for access to hose bed cross step: one chrome plated
folding step each side on front face of rear fender compartments,
and one aluminum treadplate corner step each side of rear step
compartment.
Fenders to be integral with side body compartments. Fender wells
to be equipped with full circular innerliners to prevent rust pockets
and for ease of maintenance. Rear face of body, including compartment
doors and inside of beavertails to be covered with aluminum treadplate.
Front faces of rear side compartments also to be covered with aluminum
treadplate, full height.
HANDRAILS to be 1-1/4" diameter polished steel tubing with chrome
plated end stanchions and located as follows:
One (1) vertical 29" handrail mounted oneach rearstep beaver-
tail.
-2 3-
No
TFTrATTnN4
BIDDER
COMPLIES
One (1) horizontal handrail above hose bed between end
stanchions with reinforcing rod inside.
One (1) 24" handrail mounted on each side of rear passenger
seating area
One 1) continuous handrail around rear edge of canopy
t door handle height
One 1 16" handrail
door handle height
behind each cab door vertically at
ELECTRICAL EQUIP14ENT - All 12 volt electrical equipment shall be
installed to conform to modern automotive practices. All wiring
to be SXL Ultra high temperature crosslink type. Wiring installed
by body builder to be run in loom or conduit where exposed and
protected by automatic reset circuit breakers. Circuit breakers
for warning equipment to be a minimum of 20 amps. Roof warning
light and pump panel circuits to have 30 amp breakers. Wiring
to be both color and number coded. Terminal or junction block(s)
to be Deutsch HD-54-24-16PN water tight, quarter turn (aircraft)
type.
All electrical equipment switches shall be mounted on a separate
switch panel mounted in the cab dash with master light switch
and individual switches to allow preselection of lights. All light
switches are to be "rocker" type with indicator light. The rocker
switches to have internal indicating lights to show when switch
is energized. Switches to be mounted in removable prelettered
aluminum panel for ease in service and to be pleasing in appearance.
All switches are to be appropriately identified. Body electric
system trouble shooting booklet to be furnished with apparatus.
Headlights, tail lights and running lights to be on a separate
switch and not to be under the control of the master warning light
switch.
Booklet to be provided complete with pictures of similar installation
(for identification) harness lay outs, colors, numbers, and sizes
for all wiring used, pin locations, and function operation of
wires connected to the Deutsch junction block.
Exception to this is not permitted due to expected life of unit
and serviceability in future years. A sample booklet, for our
reviewing is requested prior to awarding of contract.
The following equipment to be installed:
Two Collins BAL-1 Inside Controlled Quartz Halogen Spot Lights
installed, one on each side through windshield post.
-24-
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
One Federal Q2B siren mounted on left hand front bumper, with brake.
Yes
No
Siren actuated by horn button and treadle type floor switch mounted
on right side toe board at 45 degree angle.
One Code 3 #9300 XL Bar Light, clear filter on center red filter
on ends. All 12 lights will be rotating type. Mounted on front
top forward part of cab, easily visable. Two 200 watt speakers
shall be installed in grill of Light Bar with speaker wire run
below cab dash. With all lights to be Halogen sealed beam lamp
with two stingers oscillating light in end section. The center
two lights and the stingers will have separate switches under the
control of a master switch for the light bar to allow these two
sections to be shut down individually.
Two Collins fx-12 Quartx chrome Halogen deck lights installed,
mounted with two directional swivel (side to side) (up and down)
one each side, at rear.
Light in each enclosed compartment with automatic switch on door
framing. Indicator light on cab dash to warn of open compartment
door.
A Mars #888 light is to be installed on front of cab in line with
head lights and below "Shakopee" lettering.
Engine compartment work light.
Pump compartment work light.
Arrow type combination tail, stop and directional lights on rear
only.
Clearance lights mfg. by Signal Stat No. 1204, marker lights mfg.
by Signal Stat, back up lights mfg. by Peterson Mfg. No. M-392,
license plate bracket and light mfg. by Arrow Safety #C437-Cl2,
rear cluster lights mfg. by Peterson Mfg. #107-3, and reflectors
mfg. by Do -Ray #125T to meet Federal Government Standards. Rear
cluster marker lights to be recess mounted in the rear step flange
for protection.
Two (2) Whelen Model 800 red warninp- lights shall be provided at
rear. These to be mounted on stainless steel brackets and wired
to flash alternately. Wiring to be completely enclosed. This
25-
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
bracket to also support the two (2) Collins FX -12 Quartz deck lights
Yes
No
and the red bullet ID lights.
Four (4) step lights - one each side on front compartment face
and two at rear.
Two (2) grill Mtd/strobe lights, one red and one white, alternating.
Whelen "C" head.
EQUIPMENT
LADDERS - extension ladder to be Duo -Safety series aluminum 3 sections
30 foot. Roof ladder to be Duo -Safety series 2-14' aluminum foot
banked outside of regular extension ladder. In addition a 10'
foldinz or attic ladder to be_mount-ed -on ri�,_ht side. This is to
be Duo-Safe-ty aluminum also.
Ladders to be installed on right side of hose body in leather -lined
brackets and held in place by chrome plated quarter turn spring
loaded clamps. Ladder clamps to be designed so that when the roof
ladders are removed, the clamps can be moved 1/4 turn to hold the
extension ladder in place. Ladder bracket to be adjustable up
and down.
SUCTION HOSE - Two 10 foot lengths of 6" smooth bore hard suction
hose with long handle female couplings one end and pin lug male
coupling other end. couplings to be light weight aluminum chrome
plated. Mounted above upper left hand side compartments.
One (1) 10 foot length of 2-1/2 smooth bore hard suction hose with
rocker lug on female and male ends. Couplings to be light weight
aluminum chrome plated.
6" hard suction hose to be installed on left side of hose body
in "V" shaped troughs and held in place by chrome plated quarter
turn spring loaded clamps. Hose troughs to be adjustable up and
down. Aluminum treadplaLe scuffplates to be furnished where long
handle couplings hit loading or unloading hose.
BRASS GOODS
One (1) 6 x 4-1/2" double female hydrant adapter - chrome plated
One (1) 6" barrel strainer, chrome plated NST.
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
Yes
No
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT
One (1) 10 foot pike pole, one (1) 14 foot pike pole, and one (1)
6 foot pike pole with fiber glass handles - mounted on right side
in chrome tulip clips. For protection of paint, a piece of stainless
steel shall be screwed onto the body if the hook can come in contact
with paint.
Two (2) 6# pickhead axe with fiberglass handles - mounted on side
of cab with chrome blade holder and tulip clip. Pick cover furnished.
One (1) 20# dry chemical extinguisher with mounting bracket. A.B.C.
min 20BC.
One (1) 13# Halon extinguisher with mounting bracket. Min 2A IOBC.
Five (5) Collins CD -6 handlights with mount brackets and charger.
One (1) quart of touch-up paint.
One (1) bag of chrome, stainless steel or cadmium plated screws,
nuts, bolts and washers, as used in the construction of the unit,
shall be provided for mounting loose equipment.
All brass goods and miscellaneous equipment to be shipped loose
for mounting at Fire Department.
PRE FINISH
To insure proper quality and finish of the completed unit the f ol lowing
items, as a minimum, must be mounted while the unit is being assembled.
Prior to prime and paint, and only after proper fit, check for
operation and tolerances, these must be removed and then prepared
and painted as described in "Paint Prep and Finish".
1. All compartment doors.
2. All aluminum diamond plate including but not limited to that
which is described in the section "Running Boards, Rear Step
and Fenders".
3. Aluminum at all walkway areas.
-27-
� -7-r-
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
Yes
No
4. Grab handles and rails including rail across top of hose bed
between beavertails.
5. Drip mouldings.
6. Ladder brackets.
7. Hard suction hose brackets.
8. All cab trim strips such as wide stainless steel band around
front.
9. Wheels.
To insure proper paint and finish on complete unit, exceptions
to these requirements are not accepted.
PAINT PREP AND FINISH
All exposed metal surfaces not chrome plated or polished shall
be throughly cleaned and prepared. To prevent corrosion and to
insure bonding of primer, body shall be washed under pressure by
a phosphatizing system. All irregularities in painted surfaces
shall be rubbed down before the application of the finish coats.
After all seams have been caulked, a finish coat of imrom polyurethane
paint, of the highest quality to match existing Fire Department
apparatus, shall be applied. Substitutions will only be allowed
if the existing color cannot be matched. In this case, a letter
from the paint manufacturer must be supplied. Body assemblies
that cannot be finish painted upon assembly are to be finish painted
before assembly. Paint color shall match Dupont #3469 deluxe enamel
red.
The compartment interior must be painted with a spatter finish
for ease of cleaning and to make it easier to touch up scratches
and nicks.
GOLD LEAF STRIPING and gold leaf lettering per Fire Department
specifications as follows;
Genuine 23 karat gold lettering spelling "Shakopee" in 511 letters
across front of cab below windsheild and "Shakopee Fire Dept."
in 3" letters on drivers and passengers door. On both cab doors
below the lettering "Shakopee" and above the lettering "Fire Dept."
shall be "No. 16" in the same style 23 karat gold lettering. All
letters to be shaded in black. All gold lettering to be swirl.
Refer to print.
-28-
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
Yes
NO
COMPARTMENTS are to be fabricated of "galvanneal" hot dipped galvanized
steel and bolted to body support angles from chassis frame. All
bolts 1%4" and larger used in construction and mounting of accessories
to have a minimum of a Grade 5 rating and also have National Fine
Threads. All compartment seams are to be caulked to prevent leakage.
Side compartments to be an integral assembly with rear fenders.
Extended side and rear compartment floors to be integral with compart-
ment and of 12 gauge smooth steel. All compartments must be of
the "sweep -out" type with the floor higher then the compartment
opening flange. There shall be NO EXCEPTIONS to this requirement.
Compartments set on running boards with lip at bottom of door opening
will not be considered. Compartment door openings are to be framed
by flanging edges in 1.72" and bending out again .75" to form an
angle. Compartment doors are to be LAP TYPE with double panel
construction of galvanneal steel - 14 gauge outer panel and full
interior pan of 16 gauge. Doors to be minimum of 1.5" thick.
Outer panel door edges to be framed in a channel design to contain
inner pan. Interior of double panel doors, although they must
be made of "galvanneal" steel, must also be specially prepared
with a rust inhibiting coating. Exterior panel edges of doors must
have a small heavy duty automotive extruded rubber moulding, with
hollow core, installed on edges. In addition to this, a second
"D" rubber gasket, of the same design except slightly larger, must
be installed on door framing to insure weather-proof compartments.
All compartment doors to have polished stainless steel continuous
hinges. Hinge pin diameter to be .1875" minimum of stainless steel.
Doors to be latched with polished stainless steel recessed paddle
handle rotory lock installed after painting. Striker to be pin
type, fully adjustable with self closing latch and paddle type
handle. Free door of double door equipped compartments to have
rotary latch also. All door lock mechanisms must be fully enclosed
within the box pan door construction, to prevent fouling of the
lock,in the event equipment inside the compartment shifts into
the lock area. Switches for automatic compartment light operation
shall be installed at hinge side of door. All screws and bolts
which protrude into compartment shall have acorn nuts at ends to
prevent injury. Drip mouldings to be installed above all compartment
door openings. Aluminum treadplate walkway over fender side compart-
ments and rear intermediate step to be formed out to provide drip
protection.
Top of extended fender side compartments to be covered with polished
aluminum tread plate with rolled over edges - front, rear, and
side corners to be heliarc welded to assure a smooth finished appear-
ance. Hosebody side edgeto be rolled upward a minimum of 1.5".
Each of these covers shall be fabricated in one piece. Side compart-
ment covers that form the inside compartment will NOT be acceptable.
-29-
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
Compartments to be as follows:
Yes
No
EXTENDED SIDE: _One (1) door compartment ahead of rear wheels each
side 19-1/2" W x 24.5" D (inside) x 29.75" H. Door opening 18"
W x 26.625" H. Compartment to be vented with stamped out louvers.
Hinged toward rear wheel.
One (1) single door compartment behind rear wheels each side 34"
W x 24.5" D. (inside) x 29.75 H. Door opening 30" W x 26.625"
H. Compartment to be vented with stamped out louvers. Rear compartment
hinged toward tailboard.
REAR STEP: One (1) double door compartment ahead of rear step
- 43" W x 22" D (inside) x 29.75" H. Door opening 36.5" W x 26.625"
H. Compartment to be vented with stamped out louvers.
HIGH BODY SIDE COMPARTMENTS (750 GALLON WATER TANKS)
A total of two storage compartments to be provided over left side
fender and fender compartments. Each compartment to be a minimum
of 30"H x 54" W x 10.875" D (inside) with a minimum door opening
of 26.625" H x 52-1/211 W. Compartment and door construction to
be same as other body compartments. A total of two doors, all
hinged horizontally to be supplied.
Adjustable shelfs in all compartments.
ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT
A r_rt-w cab shall be provided between the chassis cab and the apparatus
ody. This special crew cab shall have a bench seat facing forward.
'his seat will provide easy access to the 1-1/2" speed lay compartments
upplied with 2-1/2 discharges designed for installation below
his rear removeable seat area. The crew cab shall be extended
he full width of the apparatus body. The dimensions of each of
.he two speed lays under this seat shall be 12"wide, 16" high and
;hall extend the full width of the truck. These speed lays shall
lave a removable cover which when in place forms the rear seat
.n the canopy cab. The perimeter of the two speed lay openings
ander the rear crew cab seat shall have rollers the full length
>f the sides, top, and bottom of the openings. This design then
,hall go forward to allow for the installation of doors or, each
;ide of unit. Inside of doors to be stainless steel covers. Five
air pack recessed mounting brackets are to be mounted in the appropriate
seating positions (Ziamatic Corp. Model SE Quict Seat Air Pack
)r equal).
-30-
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
Yes
No
A drawing of this designed crew cab shall be submitted with a full
body blue print showing not only the apparatus body, but also the
chassis and crew cab. This crew cab will conform with the general
drawing supplied on pages 34, 35 and 37. A crew cab style other
than displayed on drawing will not be acceptable.
To provide adequate sound protection, deluxe padding shall be provided
in both cab and jump seat area.
The walkway between the forward edge of the seating/speedlay compartment
and the engine compartment or cab canopy whichever is closer to
the speedlay compartment shall be no less than 29 inches.
A fecon balanced pressure proportioning foam system shall be provided.
This shall be of the form concentrate type. This foam system shall
be capable of discharging foam solution from 1 to 8% concentration
from one, two or all of the three (3) 2-1/2" discharges, 2 speed
lay discharges, as well as from the 3" deck gun discharge. This
system shall provide a 2-1/2" suction for drafting foam concentrate
from a droptank to the foam injection pump. The apparatus shall
have a (100) gallon stainless steel foam tank mounted over pump
area on drivers side. The 2-1/2" suction for supplying the foam
system externally shall be a gated suction operable from the pump
panel. Foam tank to be mounted such that adequate heated air movement
from lower pump compartment will sufficiently heat the tank in
cold weather. This shall not allow the concentrate temperature
to drop below 40 degrees F with the ambient temperature at -35
degrees F. A system to properly flush the entire foam system with
water will be provided. This system will be controlled from the
pump panel. This system shall function properly with the pump
discharging at maximum or minimum pressure and/or volume. The
system shall be piped and designed so ratio controllers will not
create more than 10 psi friction loss across each water pump discharge.
The system shall be adjusted for use with 3M AFFF ATC foam concentrate.
The system shall be easily adjusted to use other available foams
on the market. 100 gallons of 3M AFFF ATC foam will be supplied
to train and demonstrate the use of the truck's foam system. This
demo/training session to be given by factory engineer with no less
than 5 members of the Shakopee Fire Department present.
One (1) 6000 watt Onan gas generator mounted in forward upper right
hand side above pump compartment with oil drain piped to underside
of trunk and exhaust piped to outside.
One (1) fabricated gas tank for generator with at least 10 gallon
capacity. A top fill to be provided and an electric fuel pump
to generator.
1
-31-
a
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
Yes
No
One (1) dash board mounted starter switch for generator with hour
One (1) fuel gauge for generator to be provided on pump panel properly
One (1) electric cord reel mounted in right side of rear compartment
with capacity of at least 200' of 10/4 cord withone 4 -way water
proof junction box with mounting bracket to be mounted on right
rear tail board. Cord shall pass thru a hole in r4ght rear bussel
of lower right rear compartment with at least 4 rollers at opening
to provide easy pulling in any direction. There shall be two 20
amp circuits with four 20 amp outlets with Hubbel Model 2310 twist
lock type receptacles, two on each circuit. Cord reel shall have
electric rewind.
One (1) breaker box mounted in front right bottom compartment (16
circuit minimum). Square (D) panel.
All 110V to be installed in conduit or seal tite.
One (1) NEMA L6-20 20A-250 receptical in lower right side compartment
of breaker box.
Four (4) 125 volt 20 amp twist lock Hubbel receptical Model #2310
each on its own circuit. one on each rear bussel facing rear of
truck, one on each side in side compartment under speed lay.
Two (2) 500 watt quartz lights with 360 degree swivel mounted on
each side of rear of cab canopy.
Two (2) telescoping quartz 500 watt lights mounted one on each
rear bussel.
Quartz lights to be turned on individually from inside of cab on
Four (4) chrome wheel fenderettes.
Cleveland door holders on all bottom compartments.
BIDDER
SPECIFICATIONS COMPLIES
Yes
No
One (1) Pump heat pan complete with slide out tray bolts.
Stainless steal plate at bottom of all compartment door openings.
Aluminum deck or grating on all compartment floors.
One (1) door open warning light with alarm mounted in cab for all
compartment doors.
Undercoating of chassis.
There will be a pre -paint inspection of truck by seven (7) men.
All expenses will be paid by manufacturer.
Hypalon or equal hosebed tarp cover to protect entire hosebed area
from front to rear from elements. This cover shall be held in
place permanently along front edge and by velcro along sides of
hosebed. This shall be weighted in rear to hold end down over
rear of hosebed.
Aluminum treadplate or grafing shall be provided above pump compartment
and over foam tank to facilitate easy opertion of deck gun from
above pump compartment when nozzle is aimed forward or to sides.
Lower rear side compartment areas and lower rear center compartment
area shall be open from one to another with no dividers between.
110V male receptacle to be mounted next to quick attach air chuck
inside drivers door. This recepticle shall serve as an input for
110V power to two dual female 110V recepticles in crew cab area.
This shall also be a 110V source for wiring to be terminated with
a dual female 110V recepticle in compartment under speed lays on
drivers side of truck.
One 110V recepticle mounted in cab between driver and passinger
toward rear window of cab and wiring to be in seal tite conduit.
-33-
w
x
0
Q
z
w
0
H
a�
W
Q
z
W
H
z
H
H
O
z
w
x
w
H LY,
H
Q U
w <C
Q W
W
U
z
H
H
W
O P4
6
U U
H
:>4 W
H
U
W
P4 ila
O cn
cn y�
C7 z
z<4
H
3 w
E-
o O
Q �
O
W Pa
U) PL4
w
If,
A
v
I
M
I
o m C
U "
f
z
W
E-4
z
Oz
W
P4
z P4
az
0 �
z
1-4
U)
US Az
rg
z
O Pa
P4
O
E-4
O
PA
xx
E-A 0
fA
Iris
w
flo
zA
w
Q
A
w
A
z
w
H
z
H
H
O
z
w
w
w
H P4
E-+
A U
W �
A
a�
v
z
H
� A
H H
z
w
z�
oP-4
0
U U
H
I ev%
I
n
M
I
SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT
The City of Shakopee reserves the right to select as many items
as they wish from the list of equipment, award of bid will not
necessarily be awarded based on total bid of all items. After
bids have been awarded for additional equipment, the said equipment
shall be delivered to the Shakopee Fire Station within 90 days.
1500 feet of 5" snap-tite Dura Light Supply Line Polyurethane lined
hose with 5" snap-tite/storz couplings. 100 feet hose lengths.
2000 feet of 2-1/2" in 800 PSI burst pressure, double jacketed
100% polyester hose with 2-1/2" NST pyrolite couplings. 50 feet
hose lengths.
1000 feet of 1-3/4" in snap-tite dura -lite attack line with 1-1/2"
NST pyrolite couplings. 5001 of 1001 lengths. 500 feet of 50
feet lengths.
Note: All hose to be labled "Shakopee Fire Department" on hose
jacket towards female end.
One (1) part number FSM51M25 NST 5" snap-tite/Storz intake (4)
2-1/2" gated male NST outlet with caps and retaining chain, plus
511 gated discharge outlet with blind cap on discharge outlet with
relief value and pressure gauge.
One (1) part number FSA50M45 NST 5" snap-tite/storz to 4-1/2"
NST.
One (1) part number FSA50M30 NST 5" snap-tite/storz to 3" NST.
One (1) 30 degree elbow adapter part number FSA 50 FT 45 NST/30
degrees EL, 5" snap-tite storz to 4-1/4" NST female.
One (1) 30 degrees adapter part number FSA 50 FT 25 NST/30 degrees
EL, 5" snap-tite storz to 2-1/2" NST female.
One (1) piston intake relief value part number FSPRV50FTNST 511
snap-tite/storz to 6" NST female swivel.
One (1) Snap-tite FHR-1 hose roller.
Two (2) Akron style 1581 pyrolite leader line wyes.
Two (2) Akron style 335 pyrolite 2-1/2" double female adapters.
Two (2) Akron style 336 pyrolite 2-1/2" double male adapters.
Six (6) Akron 1-1/2" style 5028 nozzles.
-1-
-h4—
Two (2) Akron 2-1/2" style 5027 nozzles.
Two (2) Akron style 1135 2-1/2" playpipe nozzle Size 2-1/2" std.
tips 1", 1-1/8",.1-1/4" with 1-1/2" NST above shut-off.
One (1) Akron style 1573 water thief - pyrolite.
Four (4) Snap-tite FSk'1 hydrant and spanner wrench.
Two (2) Snap-tite FSPR -1 spanner wrenches.
One (1) Akron style 1750 turbojet nozzle.
One (1) Akron style 583 hose hoist.
One (1) Akron style 588 hose clamp.
One (1) Angus MEX-450 high expansion foam nozzle.
Eight (8) Elkhart S-327 2-1/2" female X 1-1/2°t male adapter with
caps and retaining chains, chrome or equal.
One (1) Elkhart S-3183-1/2" swivel female NSTX 4-1/2" male NST
chrome with long handle with cap and retaining chain, or equal.
One (1) Elkhart S-318 2-1/2" swivel female NSTX 4-1/2" male NST
chrome with long handle, or equal.
Two (2) Super -vac P164SE with door holder bracket with hook and
web strap.
One (1) Super -vac 16" x 20' tunnel with adapter.
One (1) Target 60/12 quikie saw with kit plus 2 - 12" carbide tipped
blades.
Seven (7) 4.5 Scotts air packs with 1 hour tanks with automatic
shut -offs.
Seven (7) 4.5 Scotts spare one hour bottles.
Four (4) circle D #164 with 20 amp twist lock male 500 watt quartz
flood light with mounted brackets.
One (1) 25' length soft suction hose 6" 100% polyester jacket rubber
lined with 600 PSI burst cap. with one male pyrolite and 1 female
pyrolite adapter.
Two (2) 4' Fiberglass closet hooks with brackets.
Four (4) Pick head axes with fiberglass handles with mounting brackets
and pick end covers.
-2-
?1�
cJULIUS A. COLLER, 11
JULIUS A.COLLER ATTORNEY AT LAw 612-445-1244
8 S9 - 1 940 2 1 1 WEST FIRST AVENUE
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
553Z9
July 1 , 19$4
MEMO TO: Shakopee City Council and John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Julius A. Coller, II, City Attorney
REGARDING: Continued Shiely mining operation
INTRODUCTION: The Council has requested an opinion on Shiely's continued
use of or expansion of the present quarry or mining operations in the
City of Shakopee.
BACKGROUND: The Shiely firm has been operating and mining gravel and allied
products from a quarry on land owned by it for sometime prior to the consoli-
dation between the City of Shakopee and Eagle Creek Township. The City has
acquiesced in the operation un to this point but did not avail it -sell Df
the provisions of Subd 10. Section 11.03 of the City Charter. It now appears
that the pit or mine is being enlarged within the land owned by Shiely.
Shiely holds no permit for this operation from the City of Shakopee. Whether
Shiely ever had a premit from Eagle Creek is not material at this time.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
1. Do nothing;
2. Notify Shiely pursuant to Subd 7, Section 11.05 of the City Charter to
apply for a permit for the continuation of its commercial mining operations
and set a time within which it must do so.
3. If Shiely doesnot comply within the period allowed, the City may:
A. Institute proceedings to have Shiely convicted of violating the
City Code and/or
B. Institute proceedings to enjoin the expansion and continued operation
until such time that Shiely does obtain the necessary permit.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Follow alternative 2 above.
2. If no favorable response, follow with alternative 3.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Employment of Howard Dahlgren & Associates
for Rezoning Study
DATE: July 13, 1984
Introduction:
The City has been working with John Shardlow of Howard Dahlgren
and Associates on the Moratorium Rezoning Study. At your
meeting on Tuesday, July 17th, you will be receiving a series
of recommendations from the Planning Commission regarding the
moratorium and steps to be taken for changes in the Zoning
Ordinance. During the moratorium,discussions also focused on
specific requests for rezoning of the B-2 Zone along County Road
17.
Problem:
The City, in the Conditional Use Permit for the Racetrack, required
that the Racetrack developer provide a planner to evaluate the
impact of the Racetrack on our current zoning. The planner hired
by the Racetrack was John Shardlow of Howard Dahlgren and Associates,
and he has been assisting the Planning Commission during the ninety
day moratorium. When the issue of the zoning along County Road
17 initially arose, I discussed the issue with Bruce Malkerson,
Project Coordinator for the Racetrack, because it was uncertain
as to whether or not this was a rezoning being addressed because
of the Racetrack or because of indivisual property owners who
appeared before the Planning Commission during the moratorium
discussions and asked for the rezoning. For an initial analysis
done on a broader scale Mr. Malkerson agreed that John Shardlow
could provide us some general planning information.
John Shardlow provided that information at the July 12th Planning
Commission meeting. Based on that information it is clear that
there is a need to reconsider the reasons behind the amount of
B-2 land currently provided in Shakopee. This issue exists with
or without the construction of the Racetrack; therefore, the
question is who should pay for the study to provide the informa-
tion upon which Planning Commission and Council can make a de-
cision ---on the rezoning of the B-2 property.
In discussing this issue with Mr. Malkerson at last nights
Planning Commission meeting he believes that the issue is not
Racetrack related and therefore should not be paid for by the
Racetrack. I concur with Mr. Malkerson. The estimated cost of
completing such a study is approximately $500.00.
Rezoning Study
July 13, 1984
Page -2-
Alternatives:
1. Employ John Shardlow at approximately $500.00 to complete
the needed analysis of our B-2 zoning and make recommenda-
tions for alternative zoning for the area in question.
This alternative would allow us to make a timely change
because Planning Commission has set a public hearing that
includes the rezoning of part of the B-2 adjacent to
County Road 17. For Planning Commission to make an adequate
recommendation to City Council in August regarding this
rezoning request they must have solid planning information.
By employing Mr. Shardlow for this study we will maintain
continuity of data, we will be hiring someone who has
established a good rapport with Planning Commission and
an understanding of the deeper underlying issues involved
in the B-2 zoning question.
2. Hire some other planner such as Rob Chelseth who has
experience in Shakopee and would have a sound background
in our Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Hiring a
new firm or planner to undertake this study will be tricky
because of the short time line established by Planning
Commission when it incorporated the County Road 17
rezoning request in the August hearing.
3. Try to complete the study with City staff. Given the
other recommendations that City staff will be following
up on as a result of the discussions during the moratorium,
it will be difficult for staff to undertake a project of
this scope. Normally�in major rezoning issues the City
has used a consultant planner even when it has had a
planner on staff.
4. Take no action to generate additional information for the
possible rezoning of the B-2. Council might select this
alternative if it does not follow-up on Planning Commissions
recommendation on Tuesday night. This "no action" alterna-
tive would cause a financial hardship for the developers
involved that have petitioned Planning Commission for a
rezoning along County Road 17 from B-2 to B-1.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends alternative number 1 for the reasons discussed
above. The issue of the B-2 zone in Shakopee has been a
divisive one since its institution in 1979. It is now clear,
five years later, that there has been no development within the
B-2 zone. Finally, John Shardlow's initial investigation of the
B-2 zoning question uncovered several facts which argue for a
major change in the B-2 zoning in Shakopee. To fail to follow-
up on the analysis and make a decision for change would leave
this area of the community in limbo with little likelihood of
development in the next few years.
Rezoning Study
July 13, 1984
Page -3-
Action Requested:
Direct the appropriate City staff to contract with Howard
Dahlgren and Associates for a planning study of Shakopee°s
B-2 zoning in an amount not to exceed $500.00.
JKA:cah
TO: Mayor, Council Members
FROM: Tom Brownell, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Authorize to Install No Parking Signs
DATE: July 13, 1984
INTRODUCTION
I have received complaints of parking problems, beer cans and
debris in yards and vandalism to a home from Leonard Gansen,
906 E. 1st Avenue, and George Rybak.
BACKGROUND
The problem is caused by patrons of Richard's Pub, and having
met with both complainants, I feel parking by residents only
would be helpful. These signs are the same as used on Bluff
Street and authorize towing of violators.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize staff to install "Resident Parking Only - Violators
Will be Towed," on the west side of Dakota Street, between 1st
Avenue and 2nd Avenue.
U
MEMO T0: Mayor and Council
q�
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Admin.
RE: Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Pact
DATE: July 10, 1984
TNTRODUCTION
A month or two ago, Council approved the County's proposed
Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Pact Agreement. This same agreement
was sent to several Scott County Cities and the City of Prior
Lake proposed a one sentence Amendment. The County Board has
accepted the Amendment and the revised agreement needs to be
acted upon by City Council.
PROPOSED CHANCE
The proposed change can be found on Page 3 of the attached
agreement, Section IV, Subd. 5. The addition to the Contract
is the last section in Subd. 5 that has been underlined. The
addition affords more protection to a responding agency during
a mutual aid call and has been agreed upon by the Scott County
Cities involved in the agreement.
ALTERNATIVES
11 Approve the amended agreement.
21 Don't approve the amended agreement.
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed one sentence Amendment does not change the
agreement in a substitive manner. The proposed agreement
affords us more protection if we are responding to a mutual
aid call and Staff recommends approval of the amended agree-
ment.
ACTION REQUESTED
Pass a motion approving the amended Law Enforcement Mutual
Aid Pact between Scot.t County, Belle Plaine, Jordan, New Prague,
Savage and the City of Shakopee.
JKA/bn
r7
JOSEPH F. RIES
Administrator
fttRsARA NESS
Administrative Asst
FROM
SUBJECT:
OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR
SCOTT COUNTY COURT HOUSE 110
SHAKOPEE, MN. 55379-1382 (612)-445-7750, Ext. ioo
:I ..r ,:1984
David Unmacht, Belle Plaine City Clerk July 5, 1984
Robert Morgan, Jordan City Clerk Administrator
Jerome Bohnsack, New Prague City Administrator
John K. Anderson, Shakopee City Administrator
Mark McNeill, Savage City Administrator
Joe Ries, County Administrator
Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Pact
Gentlemen and Colleagues:
Enclosed you will find a copy of Resolution No. 84050 authorizing the
execution of Mike McGuire's revised Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Pact, ap-
proved by the County Board on Tuesday, July 3, 1984.
Accompanying the resolution, is a copy of the revised pact itself for
execution by each of your respective jurisdictions. I would appreciate
the prompt return of the executed element to my personal attention as I
will be disseminating the final package to all parties. Given the frequency
of city council meetings in your respective municipalities, it is my hope
that we can have the final document packaged up and distributed by the end
of Julv. It is important then, that I be notified in the event of any opposi-
tion to the revised pact. Please call if I can be of any assistance in this
matter.
rds,
Ries
my Administrator
Encls. (2)
cc: Mike McGuire, Prior Lake City Manager
R. Kathleen Morris, County Attorney
Sheriff Doug Tietz
JR:bn
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Motion by Commissioner Seconded by Cornmissioner Mr2rrz
RESOLUTION N0. 84050 ; AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT MUTUAL AID
PACT FOR CERTAIN SCOTT COUNTY JURISDICTIONS.
WHEREAS, early in 1984, the County Sheriff in consultation
with the County Attorney, re -introduced the concept of a law
enforcement mutual aid pact to the Chiefs of Police serving the
Scott County municipalities of Belle Plaine, .Jordan, New Prague,
Prior Lake, Shakopee and Savage, who after a series of meetings
thereon reached a favorable concensus thereon; and
WHEREAS, the principle objective of the Law Enforcement Mutual
Aid Pact is to provide a means by which one Scott County law
enforcement agency can draw upon the services of any other law
enforcement agency within Scott County when an extraordinary
situation develops or when the prompt and effective enforcement
of the law requires such cooperation; and
WHEREAS, subsequently, the City Administrators/Manager brought
the pact in its final draft form to their respective councils,
sought and were granted approval and execution; and
WHEREAS, the City of Prior Lake adopted and executed the
pact with an additional provision in Part IV (General Provisions)
Subdivision 5, to -wit: "The withdrawal of such assistance shall
not result in any liability of the responding party to the
requesting party"; and
WHEREAS, in consulting with the County Attorney and later
with the City Administrators/Manager of these municipalities on
June 20, 1984, the County Administrator perceived their acceptance
of the additional provision, however, same being; conditioned
upon the renewed approval by the Cities of Belle Plaine, Jordan,
New Prague, Shakopee and Savage.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners
in and for the County of Scott, Minnesota, that the Law Enforcement
Mutual Aid Pact as amended by the City of Prior Lake, same being
before the Board, be and hereby is approved for execution on behalf
of Scott County by the Chairman of the Board, the County Administrator
and the County Sheriff, same being subject to the renewed approval
and execution by the Cities of Belle Plaine, Jordan, New Prague,
Shakopee and Savage.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County Administrator is
'dire ete'a'nereuh En `ro `Lu-rtit34[t Zratcrcr�sdcrt:g i1�t.�t�r�i} d���P���L7 rh..
copy of this resolution and request the renewed execution of the
pact by those cities named hereinabove.
LAW ENFORCEMENT MUTUAL AID PACT
T fl T' XT VIn A T nTTD of -%CV
i• I..T I✓1`1 Lit.ti l.1 Z" V itt VJli
this Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Pact is to provide a The principle objective of
ity law enforcement agency can draw upon the personnel means by which one Scott Cour
enforcement agency within Scott County when an and resources of any other law
s or when the prompt and effective enforcement of the law extraordinary situation develop
acceptance and execution of this Pact will assure law requires such cooperation. The
en they are responding to a request for assistance by enforcement personnel that wh
e of the respective jurisdiction, but within the scope of the another party, outside the scop
'act, they are fulfilling a condition of their respective Law Enforcement Mutual Aid F
its, privileges and responsibilities attendant thereto. employment with all of the rigl
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59. This agreement is made E
II. DEFINITION OF TERMS
agreement, the terms defined in this section shall have the For the purposes of this e
meanings given them.
governmental unit which is a party of this agreement. Subd. 1. "Party" means a
means a governmental unit which is entitled to become a Subd. 2. "Eligible Party"
own option. The eligible parties are the Cities of party to this agreement, at its
, New Prague, Prior Lake, and Savage, and the County of Shakopee, Jordan, Belle Plaine
�sota. Scott, all of the State of Minm
ent Assistance" includes law enforcement personnel and Subd. 3. "Law Enforcem,
equipment.
-ty" means a party which requests law enforcement Subd. 4. "Requesting Pai
assistance.
rty" means a party which provides law enforcement Subd. 5. "Responding Pa
assistance.
11
ri.
III. PARTIES
The parties to this agreement shall consist of the cities of Shakopee, Jordan, Belle
Plaine, New Prague, Prior Lake and Savage along with the County of Scott, who through
resolutions adopted by their respective governing bodies, have identified their
participation in this Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Pact. Upon adoption of such resolution
by an eligible party, copies of the agreement shall be forwarded by the Scott County
Sheriff for execution. An executed copy of this agreement shall be sent to the Mayors of
the participating cities and the Scott County Administrator. This agreement shall become
operative upon execution by two eligible parties, and shall continue in full force and
effect until withdrawn as hereinafter provided.
IV. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Subd. 1. A requesting party may ask the responding party to furnish law
enforcement assistance within the boundaries of the requesting party. When a request is
made for law enforcement assistance, the responding party may direct its law
enforcement officers to provide law enforcement assistance to the requesting party.
Subd. 2. The decision to request assistance and the procedure for making such
requests shall be made in accordance with the internal rules and procedures of the
requesting party. The decision to respond or not respond to such requests and the extent
of the response, if any, shall be made in accordance with the internal rules and procedures
of the responding party. Failure to provide assistance will not result in any liability to to
any party.
Subd. 3. The parties agree the following statement of procedure represents an
appropriate request trircumstance and will be included in the various parties internal rules
and procedures:
When there is a request for law enforcement assistance from
a requesting party in an emergency situation and an individual
officer of a party is the closest available unit, it will be up to the
discretion of the individual officer to decide whether or not to
leave the party's jurisdictional boundaries and respond.
2
Subd. 4. When a responding party provides assistance under the terms of this
agreement, it may in turn request assistance from other parties to this agreement as
"backup" during the time that the responding party is providing assistance outside its
jurisdictional boundaries.
Subd. 5. Whenever a responding party has provided assistance to a requesting party
the responding authority may at any time recall such assistance or any part thereof if the
responding authority deems same to be necessary. The withdrawal of such assistance shall
not result in any liability of the responding party to the requesting party.
Subd. 6. When a responding party, under the terms of this Law Enforcement Mutual
Aid Pact, provides law enforcement personnel to a requesting party, said personnel shall
remain under the direction and control of the responding party, shall be paid by the
responding party, shall be protected by the workman's compensation of the responding
party, and shall otherwise be deemed to be performing their regular duties for the
responding party. However, the responding party will coordinate its assistance with the
requesting party.
Subd. 7. A responding party shall be responsible for its own personnel, equipment,
supplies and other resources. A responding party shall be responsible for injuries or death
to any personnel under the direction and control of the responding party and for damage
to any equipment or supplies or other resources belonging to the responding party the
same as though the assistance was being provided within the jurisdictional boundaries of
the responding party.
Subd. 8. The requesting party shall not be responsible for any injuries, losses or
damages to persons or, property arising out of the acts of any of the personnel of a
responding party. The responding party shall not be responsible for any injuries, losses or
damages to persons or property arising out of the acts of any of the personnel of the
requesting party or the personnel of any other responding party.
3
Subd. 9. No charges will be made by the responding party for assistance or
equipment rendered to the requesting party under this agreement.
Subd. 10. The requesting party may, at any time, terminate the request for
assistance by orally indicating same to the responding party and the rights and
rPS►��.ihilitiQs,nf_+hp rP�sl�;iin�b�r: ��har��uisis�� ��rdl��mms�ir�cti�r-t.��e.
Subd. 11. It shall be the responsibility of each law enforcement administrator of
parties to fully appraise the participating personnel of the procedures, conditions, and
limitations under this Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Pact, as well as anv subsequent
amendments hereto.
V. INSURANCE.
Each of the parties will maintain insurance policies covering claims for damages for
or on account of any loss or injury directly caused by the negligent acts or omissions of
the municipality, its officers, employees and agents, all in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes Section 466.01 et seq and in the following minimum amounts:
a. $100,000.00 when the claim is one for death by wrongful act or omission, and
$100,000.00 for any claimant in anv other case.
b. $300,000.00 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence.
VI. WITHDRAWAL AND TERMINATION
Each party hereto shall be bound by the terms and conditions of this Law
Enforcement Mutual Aid Pact until it withdraws by resolution of its respective Council.
The withdrawal of one or more parties shall not affect this Law Enforcement Mutual Aid
vast as t0 tt csSe pafi iCS mk 50 Nn -4 pare Mau at ares kime
with thirty (30) days prior written notice to all other parties. The City Clerks and/or
County Administrator shall give notice of such withdrawal, and the effective date
thereof, to the other parties, as hereinbefore provided.
4
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have cause these presents to be
executed in their respective corporate names this day of
19
CITY OF SHAKOPEE CITY OF JORDAN
By: By:
Mayor Mayor
City Clerk
Chief of Police
CITY OF BELLE PLAINE
Mayor
City Clerk
Chief of Police
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
By:
Mayor
City Clerk
Chief of Police
COUNTY OF SCOTT
By:
Chairman, Board of Commissioners
County Administrator
Sheriff
5
City Clerk
Chief of Police
CITY OF NEW PRAGUE
By:
Mayor
Citv Clerk
Chief of Police
CITY OF SAVAGE
By:
Mayor
City Clerk
Chief of Police
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Fulton Scheisman
RE: Industrial Blvd. So. Retaining Wall
DATE: June 28, 1984
Introduction:
A resolution of the controversy over the appearance of the
retaining wall adjacent to Pouliot Designs Corp. is imminent.
Background:
You and I met recently with Ted Pouliot and Jim Tougher to
negotiate a decision for corrective action as authorized by
Council Nov. 1, 1983.
As a result of that meeting and subsequent conversations, the
Company is now agreeable to a solution with the following
conditions:
i
i
- S.` ,C34 r..�,i�l%�.iiiyS, i'u�iiiSil�C1 'and
installed by Bachmans, at a cost of $2,758,
will satisfy their objections to the appear-
ance of the wall.
Pouliot Corp. will administer the contract with 2,
Bachman's, acquire necessary guarantees, and
maintain the plants.
�r wherein Pouliot agrees to these conditions as attached. A lettc
liscussed earlier, removal and replacement of the easterly As we c
the wall, the other alternative acceptable to Pouliot, 90' of
,ost $3,500 plus the cost of contract administration, and would c
ied City involvement. contint
itives : Alternz
Pursue the reconstruction option; acquire more 1�
quotes for labor and materials.
Approval of the negotiated landscaping option. 2�
Seek other mutually satisfactory solutions. 3;
�ndation: RecommE
-ecommended that alternative No. 2 be chosen. It is
Requested: Action
_ approval of the landscaping alternative under the conditions Council
to by Pouliot Designs Corp. in their letter dated agreed
>st of $2,758. at a cc
9s
s(RsmiARI or j y
T• THOJIMAs ou totCDeStgnq ..;
CORPORATION
4700 Valley Industrial Boulevard South • Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 • Telephone: 612-445-8600
Cable: PDESIGN
July 13, 1984
Mr. John Anderson
City Administrator
City of Shakopee
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
RE: Industrial Blvd. Defective Retaining Wall
Dear Mr. Anderson:
New quotations have been provided to Pouliot for landscaping
improvements of the subject wall. The vendors and quoted
amounts are as follows:
Bachman's $2,627.50
Minnesota Valley Nursery $4,057.45
Approval and payment to Pouliot for one of the above quotes
will satisfy our demand for repair of the wall. If landscaping
is chosen as the remedy, Pouliot will supervise and make
payment to the vendor. The city must agree to make payment
to Pouliot in advance and Pouliot agrees to use this payment
for landscaping improvements.
If the City Council does not accept the landscaping proposal,
Pouliot will then insist on reconstruction of the defective
section of the wall.
Very truly yours,
POULIOT DESIGNS CORPORATION
Jim Tougher
Controller
jig
rn
CITY OF SHKOPEE
INCORPORATE 1870
129 E. First Ave. - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650
Mr. Ted Pouliot
Pouliot Designs
4700 Valley Industrial Blvd. .
Shakopee, MN 55379
November_ 2, 1.983
Re: Industrial Blvd. detaining Wall
Dear Mr. Pouliot:
The Shakopee City Council, at its November 1, 1983 meeting,
reversed its earlier decision to take no cor-rcctive action with
regard to the above mentioned wall.
Council directed the City Engineer to meet with you tr>
arrive at a final decision on corrective actions to be taken.
Bo Spurrier, our City Engineer, will be contacting you in the
near future regarding this matter.
If you have any questions regarding Council '4, nct ion please
contact me.
Silice rel
11 Y
John K. Anderson
City Administrator
JKA:cau
cc: Bo Spurrier, City Eng.
File
! ,I Y �� if Y t' � .
An Equal Opportunity Employer
MEMO 'r0: Mayor and C i_ ty Council.
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Pouliot Retaining Wall
DATE: October 28, 1983
I
Introduction
The City received the attached letter from Ted Pouliot dated
October 11, 1983 regarding his retaining wall. 1 have included
the the various memos and letter regarding this matter so Council
can review them as well.
Problem
Because of the nature of the discussion huLween the City Engineer
and Mr. Pouliot, I felt it necessary to met with the Assistant
City Attorney because of the potential for lingo ion. On
October 25, the City Engineer, Assistant City QW net' and I met
to discuss and review the plans that the City Engi_neer showed to
Nr. Pouliot when obtaining the easemen'_. After that discussion,
1 asked the Assistant City Attorney to put in writing his recom-
mendations with regard to our exposure to an appeal of special
assessments levied against the Pouliot property and against: the
Citv for anv contractual claim made because of'the agreement
arrived at when the wall was constructed. The Assistant City
Attorney's recommendations are attached.
Alternatives
1. Continue with our current position which is to make no changes
to the wall.
2. Follow up with one of the recommendations outlined in the City
Engineer's memo dated June 17, 1983.and attached.
Recommendation
The Assistant Citv Attorney has recommended that we make an effort
to conform the retaining wall to some reasonable aesthetic standard
acceptable to the land owner, Mr. Pouliot.
Action Requested
Authorize the appropriate City staff to take quotations for Redwood
Hcartwoodand for installation of the Redwood as facia on the retaining
,'all surd authorize the purchase of the Redwood and the installation;
or,remove and replace_ the wall in proper alignment at a cost not
to exceed $3,750.00. The cost of this work shall not be
reassessed to the properties benefitted by the construction of
Valley Industrial Boulevard South.
JKA/ jots
17./ -
MEMORANDUM
TO: John K. Anderson, City Administ
FROM: H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer `
SUBJECT: Mini By -Pass Geometrics Study ~F -----
DATE: July 13, 1984 �v
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is a bill from Westwood Planning and Engineering for
the above reference.
The attached bill was received for processing in time but it
is recommended that the amount be paid.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve payment of $3,422.61 to Westwood Planning
and Engineering Company for professional services. This amount
would be paid from the Downtown Redevelopment Fund.
WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY
7415 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 (612) 546.0155
June 30, 1984
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Attn: H.R. Spurrier
INVOICE PERIOD: May 1 -June 30, 1984
For professional engineering services regarding preliminary layout of
intersection geometries at TH 169 and TH 101. Services included:
evaluation of river bridge improvement options, determination of
right-of-way requirements and design of intersection geometries.
Traffic Engineer
Engineering Technician
Associate Planner
Draftsman
Extras
Printing costs
37.0 hours R 54.00/hr. $ 1,998.00
20.25 hours @ 28.50/hr. 577.13
25.5 hours C 28.50/hr. 726.75
4.5 hours 9 22.00/hr, 99.00
Subtotal $ 3,400.88
$ 21.73
TOTAL INVOICE $ 3,422.61
RE: Shakopee Geometries 10-752
Invoice No. 4221
There will be a finance charge of 1.25% per month (15% annual percentage rate) applied to all charges which have become more than 60 days pest due based on billing dates shown on original invoice.
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Admin.
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Application From Shakopee 84
Partnership For $600,000 Commercial
Development Revenue Note.
DATE: July 13, 1984
INTRODUCTION:
The attached application for a Commercial_ Development.
Note in the amount of $600,000 was received this afternoon.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Resolution No. 2284, Setting a Public Hearing on
a $600,000 Commercial Development Revenue Note for Shakopee
84 Partnership.
JSC/bn
Att.
Councilmember offered the following resolution and moved
its adoption, which motion was seconded by Councilmember
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROJECT
UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT ACT; CALLING FOR A
PUBLIC HEARING THEREON.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the "City"), as
follows:
SECTION i
Recitals
1.1 Shakopee 84 Partnership, a Minnesota partnership (existing or to be formed)
consisting of Jerome L. Hertel and Gary Janisch as general partners (the "Borrower"), has
advised this Council of the desire of the Borrower to acquire land in the City and
construct and equip thereon an approximately 10,500 square foot building to be used as a
neighborhood retail center with a convenience store ("Project").
1.2. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474 (the "Act"), to issue its
revenue bonds to finance capital projects, such as the Project, which constitutes property,
real and/or personal, used or useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise as
contemplated by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.02, Subd. 1(a). The Borrower has
requested that the City issue its revenue bonds in an amount not exceeding Six Hundred
Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($600,000) to finance all or a portion of the cost of the
Project.
SECTION 2
Public Hearing
2.1. Section 474.01, Subdivision 7B, of the Act requires that prior to submission of an
application to the Energy and Economic Development Authority requesting approval of
the Project as required by Section 474.01, Subdivision 7A, of the Act, this Council shall
conduct a public hearing on the proposal to undertake and finance the Project. Pursuant
to that provision, a public hearing on the proposal to undertake and finance the Project is
called and shall be held on , 1984, at o'clock P.M., at the City
Hall, Shakopee, Minnesota.
2.2. The City Clerk shall cause notice of the public hearing to be published in the official
newspaper of the City and in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, at least once
not less than fifteen (15) nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for the
hearing, such notice to be in substantially the following form:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED
PROJECT AND THE ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS UNDER THE MUNICIPAL
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, MINNESOTA
STATUTES, CHAPTER 474, AS AMENDED
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, will meet on , 1984, at o'clock P.M., at
the City Hall, 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota, for the purpose of
conducting a public hearing on a proposal that the City issue revenue bonds, in
one or more series, under the Municipal Industrial Development Act,
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended, in order to finance the cost of a
project. The proposed project will consist of the acquisition of land and the
construction and equipping thereon by Shakopee 84 Partnership, a Minnesota
partnership (existing or to be formed) consisting of Jerome L. Hertel and Gary
Janisch as general partners, of an approximately 10,500 square foot
neighborhood retail center with a convenience store. The Project will be
located in the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, at the northwest corner of the
intersection of County Road 17 (Marshall Boulevard) and Gorman Street. The
estimated total amount of the proposed bond issue is $600,000. Such principal
amount and interest thereon shall be payable by the City solely from the
revenue pledged to the payment thereof, except that such bonds may be
secured by a mortgage or other encumbrance on the project. No holder of any
such bond shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power
of the City to pay the bonds or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment
against any property of the City except the project.
A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energy and Economic
Development Authority of the State of Minnesota for approval of the project,
together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public
inspection at the office of the City Clerk between the hours of A.M.
and P.M.
All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth
above.
Dated: , 1984.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
By
City Clerk
City of Shakopee, Minnesota
6
2.3. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energy and Economic Development
Authority of the State of Minnesota, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto,
shall be placed on file at the office of the City Clerk, and shall be available for public
inspection, following the publication of the notice of public hearing, between the hours of
A.M. and P.M.
Adopted by the Council this day of , 1984.
Mayor
City Clerk
(SEAL)
Upon call of the roll, the vote on said motion was as follows:
In Favor Opposed Absent Not Voting
L `-
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Date July 13, 1984
Applicant Name: Shakopee 84 Partnership
Address: 2191 Stanford Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55105
Phone: 612-698-6428
Location of Proposed Project (address and legal description):
Please answer fully all of the following questions. You max attach
requested documentations:
1. What is the specific proposed use of the facility? Commercial
retail center to be anchored by a convenience store
2. What is the project's estimated minimum and maximum size and/or
capacity? Approximately 10,500 sq. ft.
3. How many new people will be employed in Shakopee as a direct
result of this proposed project? 15
4. What is the proposed date for start of construction? Completion
of construction? Start - September 15, 1984
Complete - January 15, 1985
5. What is the estimated range of costs for the facility:
a. Building construction.
b. Furnishings.
c. Property development.
d. Land acquisition.
e. Professional fees.
$457,600
42,000
24,000
129,300
5,000
Application for Commercial Development Issues Page 2
1) Architectural engineering $ 8,000
2) Legal
10,000
3) Fiscal 7,500
f. Other (detail). Financing fees 12,000
Interest during Construction 23,000
6. What is the applicant's legal interest in the land?
Control through purchase option
7. A list of all members of any corporation, partnership or
other organizations which will have a legal and fiscal
interest in the ownership and management of project and that
identification of that interest, and listing of credit and
professional references for all interested parties (if
applicable). Cary C. Janisch
Jerome L. Hertel
8. Resume of any person, partnership, or corporation which will
own or manage any portion of the facility. Attached.
9. If any of the project is to be leased to other parties, an
identification of those parties and a showing of commitment
for that interest. Tom Thumb, Inc. will lease 4,800 sq. ft.
Lease will be executed by August 15, 1984.
10. If interim financing is required, a showing of a binding
commitment for that financing from a reputable lender.
11. Statement as to the fiscal financing method to be used such
as bonds, mortgage revenue notes, or unsecured debt.
The loan will be structured as a tax-exempt mortgage revenue
note with a 25 -year amortization.
12. Statement as to whether the financing instruments will be
sold to individuals, insurance companies, savings institutions
or other. The loan will be placed with a financial
institution.
13. If considered appropriate by the City, a financing feasibility
report may be required which will detail those physical
service and financial factors which will indicate possible
success or failure of the proposed facility.
14. Method of payment of all public cost to be incurred in develop-
ment of the property.
i U
Application for Commercial Developmenc issues Page 3
15. Name of the underwriter or investment banker who will be
selected to place the final financing. A list of at least
five other issues which have been completed by the underwriter
or banker shall be provided.
Jerome L. Hertel - Juran & Moody, Inc.
**
16. Name of the proposed trustee to be designated.
If the financial institution purchasing the tax-exempt note
requests a trustee, First Trust Company of St. Paul will be
designated
(Signed)
(Date)
**15. Savage Retail Center, Savage, Minnesota
Holiday Inn, Boston, Massachusetts
Town Square Office Project, Forest Lake, Minnesota
Northdale 100 Office Warehouse, Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Zachary Square Shopping Center, Maple Grove, Minnesota
Ridgehave Retail Center, Minnetonka, Minnesota
ME: GARY C. JANISCH February 1, 1983
DRESS: Route 1, Box 163, Delano, Minnesota 55328
LEPHONE NUMBER: 612/972-3884 (OFFICE) 612/890-4444
TE OF BIRTH: August 26, 1948
RITAL STATUS: Married April 29, 1972 WIFE: Margaret Ann "Peggy"
?ENDENTS: Emily Charlotte Janisch, Age 6
Elizabeth Susan Janisch, ARe 3
kLTH: Excellent
,ITARY: Naval Air Reserve, June 1967 to May 1972; Honorable Discharge
)CATION: Immaculate Conception Grade School. Columbia Heights, Minnesota
Diploma Received 1962
Columbia Heights Senior High School, Columbia Heights, Minnesota
Diploma Received 1966
Dunwoody Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Two-year architectural/structural program
Diploma Received 1968
Naval Photography School, Pensacola, Florida
Six month photo training
Diploma Received 1968
North Hennepin State Junior College, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Two-year architectural program
Associate in Applied Science Degree
Diploma Received 1971
Charles Twedt Control Salesmanship Course
Certificate Received Spring, 1976
PCI Sales Course
Certificate Received February, 1980
.OYMENT: Carl Walker & Associates Consulting Engineers
Minneapolis, Minnesota
1970-1971
Part-time Employment
Spancrete Midwest
Osseo, Minnesota
February, 1968 to May, 1971
Full- time Employment
Fabcon, Incorporated
Vice President of Marketing
6111 West H41Y. 13
Savage, Minnesota
May, 1971 to present
Full-time Employment
CIVIC ACTIVITIES AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS:
City of Loretto Planning Commission Chairman
July, 1972 to June 1975
Loretto Lions Club
June, 1972 to present
Club Director - Two years
Lions Park Developer Chairman - Four years
Chairmanship of a number of functions.
Delano Community Development Corporation
Board of Directors
April, 1982 to present
Multi -Housing Products Show
Committee Member
June, 1980 to present
MBDA Regional Expo Committee Member
June, 1982 to present
PRIVATE ENTERPRISE:
Janisch Photography
1969 to present
L. J. Investments
50% owner
August, 1978 to present
I. Purchased duplex in Buffalo
2. Purchased and developed seven acres of land in Loretto
3. Purchased four -unit townhouse in Medina
Besch's Bakery
Purchased building and business
50% owner
Sold investment, February, 1982
JAN -HER Incorporated
50% owner
Invests in Real Estate
January, 1983 to present
Name: Jerome L. Hertel
Address: 2191 Stanford Av., St. Paul, MN 53105
Telephone: Home -(612) 698-6428
Office -(612)224-1500
Date of Birth: Jan 119 1946
Marital Status: Married- Wifo: R. Antoinette
Dependents: 3 Children
Health: Excellent
Education: Holy Trinity Elementary School, Winsted, Minnesota
Diploma Received 1960
Holy Trinity High School, Winsted, Minnesota
Diploma Received 1964
St. John's University, Collegeville, Minnesota
Diploma Received 1968, B.A. Degree - Mathematics
Employment: U.S. Army 1966 to 1972
Rank: Captain
Service: South Vietnam, Thailand and Laos
Honorable Discharge: March 19, 1972
Juran and Moody, Inc.
400 North Robert St.
Suite 900
St. Paul, MN 55101
May 1972 to Present
Positions Held: Assistant Bond Trader 1972-1974
Associate Trader 1974-1976
Underwriter 1976 -Present
Current Position: Vice President and
Partner(Stockholder)
Professional Licenses(N.A.S.D. and S.E.C.):
Registered Representative
Registered Principal
Registered Financial Principal
Civic Activities and Proffesional Organizations:
Twin Cities Bond Association
1975 to Present
Our Little Brothers and Sisters Orphanage
1977 to Present
Member of Finance Committee
Minnesota Chapter of American Cancer Society