Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/17/1984 MEMO TO: Mayor and Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Admin. RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items. DATE: April 11, 1984 1] We received a copy of a very nice letter that Senator Bob Schmitz submitted on behalf of Commissioner Bill Koniarski's nomination as Regional Citizen of the year. It's nice to know our State Officials will lend their name in support of a local official. 21 Prahm-Coll appeared before the Planning Commission on April 5th. The pur- pose was to clarify Planning Commission's conditional use requirement requiring a Patrolman on site. Planning Commission stated that their intent was to insure that there were Security Guards in sufficient number to correspond to crowd size. Both the applicant and Planning Commission agreed that Security Guards were appropriate and not Minnesota State Licensed Patrolman [i.e. Police Officers] . Tom Brownell has a policy which prohibits his Officers from working part-time in establishments that serve liquor, so his staff wouldn't have been available anyway. 31 The Prior Lake-Spring Lake Watershed District has continued their lake outlet release and it is currently at 23.3 cubic feet per second. There has been some problems in fields owned by Terry Hanson, but those are the only problems we've heard thus far this year. 41 LeRoy reported that he had just received approval from the Fire Marshall's Office to try one more "fix' on the existing stove. The purpose of trying one more fix was due to the fact that the stove supplier, who had been contacted every two weeks for many months by LeRoy, wasn't producing. LeRoy didn't know whether the fix would work and didn't want Council to cancel approval of the new stove unless such a fix was possible. As it turned out the corrected repairs were made while LeRoy was on vacation. 51 Attached is a memo from Tom Brownell entitled, "Calendar Parking Infor- mation". It's Tom's follow-up on the Goals and Objectives item suggesting we review the current policy. Rather than make this an Agenda item, Tom would rather discuss the ordinance with any Councilmember interested in possible changes before we have a full blown discussion of changes. I know John Leroux had some specific questions, so John may want to call Tom. 6] Attached are two letters of congratulations to the Mayor regarding the Racetrack. 7] Attached is the Agenda for the Energy and Transportation Committee Meeting scheduled for April 19, 1984. 8] Attached is the Annual Report on weed control for 1983. 91 Attached is the Building Activity Report for the month ending March 31, 1984. 101 Attached are the minutes of the March 28, 1984 Downtown Ad Hoc Committee Meeting. Non-Agenda Informational Items Page 2 April 11, 1984 11] Attached are the minutes of the March 15, 1984 Shakopee Public Utility's Commission meeting. 121 Attached is General Information in selecting a Financial Consultant to assist and advise the City. This material was sent to Robert Pulsher, Springsted, Inc. , Bill Fahey, Springsted, Inc. , and Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. Also attached is Ehler's and Associates, Inc. Monthly News Letter. Please read it and bring it with you on April 24th when we will interview Bond Consultants. 131 The streets in Eaglewood and Deerview are breaking up badly. We are controlling garbage pick-up by requiring empty trucks. If the haulers don't cooperate, we may need to make quick interim changes. We'll keep you posted. i i City of Shakopee POLICE DEPARTMENT 476 South Gorman Street SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 Tel. 445-6666 TO: Mayor, Council Members FROM: Tom Brownell, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Calendar Parking Information DATE: April 2, 1984 On November 15, 1982, calendar parking was put into effect in order to reduce the cost of snow removal from city streets. The street department feels the calendar parking restriction has accomplished a reduction in the cost of snow removal relative to man hours and fuel consumption . The police department issued only warning tags during November of 1982 in an effort to educate the motorist to the program without penalty . Calendar parking citations issued in 1982-1983 totaled 844 . In 1983-1984 1,007 citations were issued. Had enforcement been used in November of 1982 the yearly totals would have been equal . .J O - F-'L(7E �:7o ('Lo LE.CL THOMAS L. HENNEN SCOTT COUNTY AUDITOR COURT HOUSE 102 SHAKOPEE, MN. 55379-1379 (612)-445-7750, Ext.160 Deputy Auditor THOMAS LANNON April 2, 1984 (Ext. 168) Divisions of: Eldon Reinke 5 1984Taxation Mayor of Shakopee APR ALLEN STICHA (Ext. 172) 129 E. 1st Ave. GARY McKIVER City Hall cay C, (Ext. 167) Shakopee, NLN 55379 Licensing JEFFSNYDER RE: Shakopee Racetrack (Ext. 165) VIRGINIA ANDERSON Mr. Reinke: (Ext.171) Elections This is just a brief note to offer my congratulations to MARY KAY KES (Ext. 161) you, the City Council, your staff and all others who so diligently put forth the effort to make the Shakopee Racetrack a reality. It is with great pride that I serve as County Auditor, where a community has such foresight, initiative, and motivation, to undertake such a tremen- dous task as this. I am certain that ,you have looked upon this added adventure as one more step towards making Scott County the "Entertainment Center of Minnesota." The community is indeed indebted to you for all this. Again, congratulations on a job well done and if I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully, Thomas L. Hennen Scott County Auditor TLE/cb An Equal Opportunity Employer (CITY OF SAINT PAUL OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL JAMES SCHEIBEL. Councilman 0"1, APR .. 91984 April 6, 1984 Dear Mayor Eldon Reinke, Congratulations on your city's successful bid for the Twin Cities Horse Race Track. Having been selected on the first ballot, despite the stiff competition, speaks to the superiority of your plans. I am sure you are anticipating the positive developments the track will bring your community. The plans I have seen are quite impressive. Congratulations again and I wish you the best of luck in your endeavor. Sinc e y, A� J' Scheibel Councilmember CITY HALL SEVENTH FLOOR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 612/298-5679 22 TENTATIVE AGENDA Energy and Transportation Committee Shakopee, Minnesota April 19, 1984 Chrmn. Dunwell presiding 1 . Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 . Approval of Meeting Minutes from March 15 , 1984 . 3 . Presentation: Frank Boyles, City of Plymouth 4 . Other Business 5 . Adjournment Judi Simac City Planner CITY OF SHAKOPEE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MARCH 15, 1984 Dawn Schwingler called the meeting to order at 7.35 p.m. with members Ziegler, Dunwell, Spiotta and Weeks present. Also present was Judi Simac, City Planner. The City Planner called for nominations for Chairman. Ziegler nominated Dave Dunwell for Chairman. Dunwell nominated Bob Ziegler for Chairman. Ziegler declined the nomination be- cause of probable work conflicts. Weeks/Schwingler moved to close nominations for Chairman. Motion to approve Dunwell for Chairman carried with Dunwell opposed. Chairman Dunwell called for nominations for Vice-Chair. Schwingler nominated Weeks for Vice-Chair. Schwingler/Ziegler moved to close nominations. Motion to approve Weeks for Vice-Chair carried with Weeks abstaining. Chrm. Dunwell called for nominations for Secretary. Spiotta moved to nominate Schwingler for Secretary. Ziegler/Weeks moved to close nominations. Motion to approve Schwingler for Secretary carried unanimously. Ziegler/Schwingler moved to approve the minutes of January 19, 1984 as kept. Motion carried unanimously. The City Planner stated she attended the meeting of the Metropolitan Systems Com- mittee, which gave a favorable review of the Opt Out plan. That committee said the plan is consistent with the Transportation Policy Plan. It also recommended the formulation of an explicit evaluation program prior to actual implementation. MnDOT has pledged help with this program. Discussion followed on the comments of MTC rem rding the Opt Out Plan, which also offered the assistance of its staff. They recommended that Shakopee request Met Council to simulate the proposed system using the Forecast Model to set realistic ridership goals and other performance measures. The City Planner said she would research the use of this Model to determine if there is a fee for it, and if so, if it can be worked into the application cost. The City Planner reported that she testified on behalf of the City in front of the Senate Transportation Committee, which is considering the Opt Out bill. The bill has to go through Government Operations and Finance Committees yet. Energy & Transportation March 15, 1984 Page 2 Member Schwingler reported that beginning Monday there was an extra bus going just to Eden Prairie mornings and evenings. And Chaska now has a new articula- tor bus. She also thought there was to be a bus from Eden Prairie to Southdale. The City Planner said she would check out that information. The City Planner said she has attended a joint meeting with Shakopee, Chaska, Chanhassen and Eden Prairie about opting out. She is going to keep the communi- cation open for the possibility of a joint service, while still proceeding with Shakopee's application. The City Planner said that Frank Boyle, of Plymouth's Metro Link, is willing to come to next month's meeting to talk about getting started with the marketing, etc. for implementing the Opt Out program, and to answer any questions. Discussion ensued on the items listed in the memo which need clarification before implementation can begin. Additional background information was given for the benefit of the two new members to the committee. The City Planner said she would check on what areas the vans would be allowed to pick up and drop off downtown. Comment was made that September was felt to be a good time to start the system, as summer ridership is usually down. The City Planner would check to see if the 18 month contra ct time for the demonstration program would start when the plan is approved, or would actually rover operation time only. Consensus was to change next month's meeting, because of Maunday Thursday, to April 26, 1984, and to invite Plymouth's representative to speak. The City Planner informed the new members that this committee is still seeking more members. She said she would like this committee to also research energy issues and such items as windmills, solar access and cable dishes as they relate to zoning. She said she is willing to research any topic the committee members feel would be interesting to pursue. Ziegler/Schwingler moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting ad- journed at 9.22 p.m. Judi Simac City Planner Diane S. Beuch Recording Secretary O 83 ANNUAL CITY REPORT ON WEED CONTROL FOR 19 Required by Minnesota Statute 18.261 APR - 4 1984 CITY Or SHAKC-`F, Submit Report to County Agricultural Inspector by December 15 City County Date County Agricultural Inspector 's Name and Address 1. If you have appointed an Assistant City Wee Inspector, please indicate the person's name and address in the space provided at right: 2. flow many weed inspection tours were made in your city with the County Agricultural In- spector this year? 3. Does your city have a special ordinance for weed and grass control? YES NO In what year was this special ordinance adopted? 4. How many notices to control weeds and grasses were served under this special ordinance this year? 5. If your city does not have a special ordinance, how many Inspectors' Notices (Previously form 1's) were served to control noxious weeds on private property in your city this year? 6. How many times did your city hire or do the control work under either a special ordinance or the noxious weed law in which the costs were added to the landowners taxes this year? 7. What was the amount of money paid to the mayor or the assistant city weed inspector for weed work this year? (Include costs of $ attending annual weed meeting, weed tours, meals, and mileage) 7/4, 8. What was the cost of spraying and mowing city $ $ property for weed and grass control this year? (Do not include brush control or snow removal costs) ;i SIGNATURES OF CITY OFFICIALS Mayor;1 7 Address -s jcv i anf—c LY rvce=nspec o Address /` s AG 0 89-04 ORIGINAL - City Mayor TWO COPIES - County Agricultural Inspecto f i CITY OF SHAKUPEE' B3U 1 LD1NG AC T1 VI TY REPORT March, 1984 PERMITS ISSUED Yr. to Date 'Total Previous Year 6214 - 6247 Number Number VrIJ uat iora Number Valuation Mn . YTD. Single Fam.-Scwered 4 9 558 ,300 9 10 541 ,250 Single Farn.-Septic 1 2 143 ,000 2 2 154 ,660 Multiple Dwellings 2 2 1215000 - 1 70,000 (MoXnits) (YTD Units) (4) (4) ( 2 ) Dwelling Additions 6 8 115 ,473 4 5 2423100 Other - - - - 2 23 ,000 Business District 1 1. 155000 1 1. 1 Agricul tur,al - - - - - - Industrial -Sewered - - - - - - Industrial -Septic - - - - - - A.•k' ovy/i�;rrcrl e,; 2 3 19 , 300 1 1 500 Signs & Fences 2 4 33200 6 10 165600 ;; Look, - 3 12 , 700 3 6 185025 Grading;/Foundation 2 2 34 ,000 5 7 85 , 500 Hernodelinp (Res. ) 3 12 75 ,800 1 5 10 , 778 Remodeling ( Inst . ) - - - 1 1 100 ,000 Remodeling (Other) 9 16 287 ,599 2 4 19 , 555 TO'TA1, TAXA)i t,E 34 64 1 ,385 ,372 33 54 1 , 181 ,968 TOTA1, 1NST1 'I'UTT( NAL - - - 1 1 100,000 GRAND TOTAL, 34 64 1 , 385 , 372 34 55 1 ,2813968 MO. YTD. MO . 7T1) . Variances 1 2 1 3 Conditional Use 1 1 1 1 He-zoning; - 1 - - Moving - - - 1 Electric Permits 19 57 11 24 111mbg;. & Htg. Permits 19 46 20 39 Razing Permits Residential - - - - Commercial - 1 - - Total dwelling units in city a.1'ter completion of ,if I c,onstruc:tion hc;rmitted to date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 ,678 Cora Underwood Bldg. Dept . Secretary - 1 CITY OF SHAKOPEE BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IN MARCH, 1984 6214 Terry Larson 21.Q0 Hillside Dr. House $ 75 ,000 6215 Logeais Homes 1035 Eastview Cir. Duplex 30 , 250 Logeais Homes � � "6' '`�"�"✓ ( 1 unit ) ( 831800) 6216 Lo g 103 Eastview Cir. Duplex 30 ,250 6217 Logeais Homes '0 041 �Q.v�GC'�c�'«" ( 1 unit ) g 1041 Eastview Cir. Duplex 30 ,250 7 / ,.c,-ems -- /_sem ( 1 unit ) (83 ,800) 6218 Logeais Homes 1043 Eastview Cir. Duplex 305250 ( 1 unit ) 6219 Howe , Inc . 7632 Hwy. 101 Foundation 24 ,000 6220 Theis Const . 1075 Miller St . Addn. 8 , 500 6221 Erhardt Dallmann 1970 E. 11th Ave . Addn. 15,250 6222 Bardley Fox 2187 E. Hwy . 101 Alt . 500 6223 Fred Houle 231 Sommerville Garage 7 , 500 6224 Menke Const . 197Q Davis Court House 71 ,800 6225 Bradley Fox 2187 E. '�iwj� 101 Alt . 1 ,000 6226 Robert White 312 E. 1st Ave . Alt . 900 6227 Jefferson Carpentry 731 Bluff Ave . Alt . 6 ,000 6228 Michael Menke 654 Hen s Ave. House 61 ,000 6229 Joe Link 1257 yler St . � House 565000 i z 24 -- 6230 Tower Const 1929 Eagle Creek Addn. 405000 6231 Mike Macklin 1047 Harrison Alt . 65500 6232 David Moonen 223 Holmes St . Alt . 45000 6233 Bradley Fox 2187 E. Hwy. 101 Alt . 1 , 700 6234 Ford Motor Co. 1400 E. 1st Ave. Temp. Sign 6235 E.M.G. Sunway 970 Swift Addn. 115123 6236 Mike Macklin 1047 Harrison Addn. 75000 6237 G.F. Juergens 1221 E. Fourth Ave . Alt . 500 6238 G .F. Juergens 725 E. Fourth Ave . Alt . 500 C� 6239 Bradley Fox 2187 Hwy 101 Alt . 3 ,000 6240 Muenchow Concrete 1949 E. 11th Ave . Addn. 3 , 500 6241 Eagan Const . 8000 E. Hwy 101 Alt . 15 ,000 6242 Jeff Sand 1900 Thirteenth Ave . House 65 ,000 -r s r v 6243 C.H. Carlson 644 Jeers ncSt Gare 43800 6244 Oberg Const . 435 W. 7th St . Addn. 23 ,000 6245 Cedar Fair One Valley Fair Dr. Alt . 12 ,000 6246 Richard Stoks 135 S . Atwood Sign 400 6247 E.L. Prahm 2400 E. Fourth Ave . Foundation 10 ,000 $ 642 ,473 PROCEEDINGS OF THE DOWNTOWN AD HOC COMMITTEE SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA March 28, 1984 Chrm. Laurent called the meeting to order at 7 : 30 A.M. with the following voting members present: Bill Wermerskirchen Jr. , Dan Steil, Terry Link, Mike Sortum, Don Martin, Steve Clay and Jerry Wampach. Non-voting members present: Lee Stoltzman, Al Furrie and Paul Wermerskirchen. Absent: Joe Topic, Jim Stillman, Terry Klinger, Frank Reid and Trevor Walsten. Also present: Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director, Dick Krier and Jack Lynch, Consultants, John Anderson, City Administrator and Bo Spurrier, City Engineer. Link/Steil moved to approve the minutes of March 14 , 1984 as presented. Motion carried. Chrm. Laurent turned the meeting over to Jeanne Andre to review the Redevelopment Plan and Program following her memo included in the March 14 , 1984 agenda packet. Discussion was held regarding the description of the redevelopment project area and how it relates to the design area, improvement area and commerical rehabilitation loan area . It was the concensus of the committee to keep the project and design areas broad as in the plan. Mr. Krier explained that smaller improvement districts will be created periodically as the City phases its public improvements . The concensus was to have a smaller commerical rehabilitation loan area. Dick Krier suggested he would make up a list of activities that should occur and a policy guideline for what improvements could be undertaken with the loan money. The committee asked to be notified by City staff on all applications and inquiries for loan funds . Discussion was then held regarding Goals & Objectives with Mr. Krier briefly reviewing his proposed objectives and taking comments on changes or additions . Concensus was reached on the following changes to the goals and objectives list distributed in the redevelopment plan: Al : Accommodate (add: at least ) 100 additional multi-family housing unit development. Item 1 : Promote (delete primarily) owner-occupied housing. A2 : Item 4 : Delete and add new item under Land Use: Construct a New City Hall within the Downtown Area. Delete : Item 9 : Restore & Utilize railroad depot as restaurant if possible. A3 : Accommodate most new office development in the (change Industrial to Institutional ) Area southwest of the Retail Core Area. lG Item 2 : Add a / between "design/economic link" . A4 : Add Item 1: Create a sense of arrival to the downtown and Item 2 : Limit expansion of the retail core. Add A5 : Capture tourist traffic in downtown retail area. Add B6 : Create economic incentives available only Downtown to stimulate downtown redevelopment. C4 : Item 4 : Change to: Vacate Atwood Street between Fifth and Third Avenue (instead of Fifth and Fourth) to create land for office development. C6 : Item 3 : Change to: Provide at-grade access across First Avenue at (Add: Fuller and Scott, Delete: Atwood) and at Sommerville. C8 : Add Item 3 : Provide urban design elements to improve the environment along Second Avenue. Item 2 : Work with the railroad to create safe pedestrian crossing system along Second Avenue (Add: and to remove existing overhead communications lines ) . Add C9 : Extend Levee Drive eastward. Add Dll : Create a sense of arrival at Sommerville and Fuller Streets and the 169 river bridge. Add D12 : Develop opportunities created by the historic character and the riverfront. Delete D8 : Develop a campground along north bank of the Minnesota River. E3 : Item 3 : Beautify riverfront (Add: and alley areas ) . Delete E5 : Develop a campground along north bank of the Minnesota River. Concensus was add to the administrative guidelines, for the rehab loan program (to be prepared) , a goal to promote improvement with no loans for property outside of the rehab area. Discussion was held on page 10, Types of Redevelopment Activities, Concensus was to change the fourth item into two; 1) New Construction of retail office and housing facilities, and 2 ) Public improvement of street, parking lots , pedestrian walkways, bus shelters , and pedestrian plazas. In regard to Land Use Provisions and Requirements, Dick Krier indicated the advantages of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) which are: flexibility for developers, more control for local municipal- ity and a way to enforce design guidelines. Jeanne Andre indicated she is unsure how the City' s current PUD regulations would apply L} to a redevelopment project, but this could be researched. It was the concensus of the committee to promote development under a PUD process, with further research into the existing PUD provisions in Shakopee. Page 14 ; Redevelopers Obligations; Item 6 : All public and private utility services such as water, sewer, gas, electric, telephone, serving the parcel of land to be sold to the redeveloper under this plan should be placed underground. (Delete: except where physical conditions prohibit. ) Dick Krier had to leave at 9 : 00 A.M. so the review of the plan will be carried over to the next meeting. Chrm. Laurent then went back to the agenda updates. Jeanne Andre informed the committee that the City Council had approved the Westwood Proposal for Services for aerial photography for orthographic projection. She indicated that the City Engineer had initiated a meeting with Mn DOT regarding action on the Mini- by-Pass. They informed him that they need more detail on the bridge plans and costs of the intersection changes and 101 by-pass . Mn DOT staff also indicated they could provide funds for bridge improve- ments but not the other proposed changes . The City Engineer will further research funding possibilities . Jeanne Andre went to the Scott County Historical Society meeting regarding the Maurice Stans Home and suggested to them that they make a presentation to the committee of their plans for the home. She indicated that the society appeared to be more interested in a use for the building on the current site than on moving it to another location. Don Martin left at 9 : 25 A.M. Also, there has been an inquiry about a presentation of plans to change the railroad depot into living quarters . It was the con- census of the committee to delay these two presentations until they have a chance to finish the review of the Redevelopment Plan and Program. Steil/Link moved to adjourn at 9 : 30 A.M. Motion carried. Toni Warhol Recording Secretary MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (Adjourned Regular Meeting) The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in adjourned regular session on March 15, 1984 at 4:30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room. Commissioner Bishop offered a prayer for divine guidance in the deliberations of the Commission. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Bishop, Cook and Kirchmeier. Also Superintendent Leaveck, Manager Van Hout, Secretary Menden and Liaison Wampach. Also present were Jim Kephart and Randy Gorman. Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Cook that the minutes from the February 6, 1984 regular meeting and the February 16, 1984 special meeting and the March 5th, 1984 regular meeting be approved as kept. Motion carried. Mr. Jerome Jaspers and Mr. Jim Strefland from Jaspers Loosbrock and Co. were present to present the 1983 Shakopee Public Utilities Commission audit. Approval of the audit was tabled until the April meeting. A letter from George Muenchow, Community Services Director, regarding light standards for Tahpah Park was placed on file. A letter from the State of Minnesota Department of Public Service regarding a proposed change in the service areas for the Sand Pointe Addition was acknowledged. Motion by Cook, seconded by Kirchmeier that the Letter from the State of Minnesota Department of Public Service dated February 10, 1984 be placed on file for future use. Motion carried. Manager Van Hout informed the Commission of a conversation about picture ID cards by a resident of Shakopee. The status of various legal matters regarding past due bills were acknowledged by Manager Van Hout. Motion by Cook, seconded by Kirchmeier that we pay the filing fee to Julius A Coller II of $30.00 and proceed on the trial basis with our complaint against Tim Guimond. The result of the truck bids was given to the Commission by Superintendent Leaveck. Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Cook to accept the bid from Shakopee Ford for the purchase of a new van for a purchase price of $9,241.71 plus the necessary charges for undercoating and rustproofing. Motion carried. The proposed plan for the restroom to be located near Pumphouse #1 was presented by Manager Van Hout. Discussion took place concerning interference with operation of Shakopee Public Utilities Commission facilities. The building is not expected to cause any difficulty with operation of the substation or pumphouse and the watermain is to be located away from the site without cost to the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. The consensus was to concur with the placement of the structure as planned. !i Liaison Wampach gave the Liaison report, and left the meeting to attend a public hearing. Motion by Cook, seconded by Kirchmeier to present Resolution #271, A Resolution Setting Water Connection Charges. Ayes: Commissioners Bishop, Kirchmeier and Cook. Nayes: none. Motion carried. Resolution passed. Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Cook to present Resolution #272 a Resolution Clarifying Factors Used in the Determination of the Contribution From the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission to the City of Shakopee in Lieu of Taxes. Ayes: Commissioners Bishop, Cook and Kirchmeier. Nayes: none. Motion carried. Fire Flow responsibilities were discussed. The question of adequate fire flow for a particular use is not one for Shakopee Public Utilities to answer. The information on file regarding tests of available fire flows can be released on request to aid a customers engineer in his piping design. Proposed changes in the water specifications and the water service policies were presented by Manager Van Hout. The revised water specifications and water service policies will be typed up and presented at the April meeting. The Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association Legislative roundup will be March 29, 1984. The Commission authorized Manager Van Hout to attend the APPA Computer Class along with anyone else he would like to attend. Some alternative proposals for the racetrack electric service were presented by Manager Van Hout. The charges involved in the racetrack electric service were reviewed briefly. The answer to a request for information by an Engineer from Airco, Inc. regarding electric rates and capacity requests were discussed. Commissioner Kirchmeier ,requested Manager Van Hout check the electric rate structure for the April meeting. There were no new plats for March, 1984. There were four fire calls for a total of 5 hours and 25 minutes for the month of March, 1984. There were no lost time accidents for March, 1984. Motion by Cook, seconded by Kirchmeier that the meeting be adjourned. Motion carried. A- 1'e �. �. Barbara Menden, Secretary GENERAL INFORMATION The City of Shakopee is interested in selecting a financial con- sultant to assist and advise the City. Your firm is being invited to submit qualifications and a proposal at this time. If you are not interested, please notify the City, in writing, indicating the reason(s ) why you decline to participate. The selection procedure will consist of your submission of your credentials, a proposal, and other requested information. Written material should be submitted no later than Friday, April 20, 1984 . Oral presentations are scheduled from 7 : 00 p.m. - 10 : 00 p.m. Tuesday, April 24 , 1984 . The following information must be included in your written presen- tation: 1 ) A statement of your firm' s opinion (philosophy) about what services a financial consultant should provide a City? How your firm goes about providing such a service? Why your firm is best able to provide this service? 2 ) Experience of your firm and resume of the individual that would be in charge of the project. Resume should include relevant experience and an indication of the nature and extent of the individual ' s involvement in similar communities . Include a list of client Cities similar in size and nature indicating all relevant information about each client City. 3 ) History of Firm - Indicate the number of employees , annual payroll, and the firm' s age. Also indicate affiliations and ownership of your firm. 4 ) List other employees who would be assigned to this project and indicate their qualifications and relevant experience. 5 ) Your proposed fee schedule. 6 ) A statement about your firm' s approach to assisting a client City improve its bond rating. When do you recommend apply- ing for a new rating, what circumstances make it appropriate to apply, etc. Please submit the requested written information by: April 20 , 1984 at 12 : 00 Noon to: John K. Anderson City Administrator 129 E. 1st Ave. Shakopee, MN 55379 Any questions you may have should be directed to John K. Anderson at 445-3650 . The City reserves the right to terminate the selection process at any time and reject any or all offers . The City shall not be liable for any pre-contract cost incurred by interested firms participating in the selection process . 1 `v CITY OF SHAKOPEE INCORPORATED 1870 129 E. First Ave. - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650 .i x4• i April 11 , 1.984 Mr . Robert Pulsher Springsted, Inc. 800 Osborn Building St . Paul , MN 55102 Re : Financial Consultant-Request for Proposal Dear Bob: The City of Shakopee has decided to review the financial consultant services it currently receives . To accomplish this the City is inviting three financial consulting firms to make written and oral proposals to City Council so that Council can select a financial consultant . The attached request for proposal outlines the written elements of the proposal the City would like each applicant to supply by Friday, April 20 , 1984. This written material will then be available for City Council to review over the weekend and prior to a special Council meeting on Tuesday, April 24, 1984. The Tuesday meeting will be from 7 : 00 p.m. to 10: 00 p.m. with each of the three financial consultant firms making a presentation to City Council . If you have any questions regarding the request for proposal , please contact me . Sincerely, John K. tAderson City Administrator JKA: cah Enclosure ci 7" 1 0 r O ci r c S �� c7 l 0 tt An Equal Opportunity Employer Y EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FINANCIAL SPECIALISTS FIRST NATIONAL-SOO LINE CONCOURSE 507 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 339-8291 (AREA CODE 612) i FILE: Financial Specialists: Ehlers and Associates, Inc. Please distribute to governing body members April 1, 1984 Newsletter i After a good deal of early promise, tax exempt interest rates rose again by early March from 9.56% to 9.94% (BBI). This follows the general trend of interest rates in the realization that $200 billion deficits are a pernicious problem. Tax exempt yields are especially affected by the huge supply of public bonds issued and outstanding for private purposes. Conflicts of interest in fiscal consulting/bond underwriting need some discussion. Our recent survey drew a lot of blanks and question marks to the statement: A financial advisor . . . should be entirely independent of any underwriting (buying) interest. . . . may be an underwriter if he agrees not to bid on our bonds. who is an underwriter and who offers to bid on the bonds has a serious conflict. . . . who is an underwriter and who agrees not to bid on the bonds is one less bidder. . . . who is an underwriter may have conflicts of interest in other financings where another underwriter may be the advisor. Many checked no responses and some only one or two of them. Here's what we think. 1. An advisor should be a fiduciary and represent only one side. In response to our question, many said that the advisor should be free of any underwriting interest and, in a sense, this answers the others. 2. An underwriter who agrees not to bid on your bonds may still have conflicts. a. The advisor may convert the bond issue to a private sale "to save the consulting fee". b. The issuer (you) gets one less bidder. c. The underwriter/advisor may have a conflict arising out of an entirely different issue. A function of an advisor is to recommend (or not to recommend) acceptance of an offer. Suppose the bidder on your issue is the advisor in another community's issue which your advisor wishes to underwrite -- is there not a conflict? 3. Obviously, the advisor who also wishes to buy your bonds has a conflict. How can he advise you that his is the best offer? 4. An underwriter/advisor who will not offer to buy your bonds means one less purchaser. 5. Underwriters participate in bidding syndicates all over and Underwriter A, as advisor where Underwriter B offers to buy your bonds, may well find the roles reversed in another issue in some other place, maybe in a different state. There Underwriter B, acting as advisor, may be in a retaliatory position where Underwriter A is a purchaser. Thus, Underwriter/Advisor A may have a serious conflict of interest in advising you on your issue. It must be recognized that underwriters in buying bonds, are principals not agents of the issuer. This is not to say that underwriters are unethical but, as all merchants, they try to acquire inventories as cheaply as possible. This merely says that, where there are conflicts, one interest may predominate at the expense of another. Why not cut through all of that problem and look for a very good independent financial advisor? Ehlers & Associates are very good independent financial advisors. Thanking you for your interest, we are Very truly yours, EHLERS ANDSSOCIATES ; INC. rt / ersG 0006n/4 m N O CI SSS..Z.SZ SO SOSii S N SSS ZSS �OO�nONO�nO m00000ry p il U U u m o N �. WHO T SPH.O O P m✓ w E yy o6a 6Q¢v�¢Qw c E x m � i000000 Ohm Oct"' O m.E+m000000 0000000 N m vi rOV1 ¢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .....0 0 O — O ...... 0 hillD r sLL ¢aux w l moo y-No oN vcnN r.ed<mo Q u 'n 3o6LCYN� Z MONACO mONACO � n z Ove 3 3 2o3i2� `\ ¢¢ ¢¢ ¢ 2222 za ¢aSimi Zi¢ 22mm2¢ X X X Q K X X X X OX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X� 11 so X X X X X as X X X X X X 414 XX m P m m X X X X O n X X 89 � O a O^ i S O O O N O N 0 0 0 O O O O N O OOv+r�a p n r a� rt r o E EEi E c E ¢E a 4 a x E E x m E� 000 n EO lit o O o O O O O O O .... OOO ....0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E� E uEQ �p pU E E c n a a ut C h o c E LL N3xNu z 2- J- - 3� �n�n ----- -.--- .+c¢a.� TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ .REG .SESSION SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA APRIL 17 , 1984 Mayor Reinke presiding 11 Roll Call at 7 :00 p .m. 21 Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 3] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 4] Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterick are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. ) #� ] Approval of the Minutes of April 3 , 1984 61 Communications: a] Minnesota Horse Expo 184 b] League of Minnesota Cities re : 1984 Nominations for LMC Board of Directors c] Minnesota Department of Economic Security re : the Shakopee Job Service Office d] League of Minnesota Cities re : Residency Requirements, Comparable Worth and Legal Notice e] Chuck Mensing re : Purchase of City Property on 4th Avenue ` 71 Public Hearings: 7 :30 p .m. Public Hearin on Vacation of Three Feet of a Utility y and Drainage Easement on Vohnoutka property at 10th and Sibley - Res. No. 2244 r 7 : 35 p.m. Public Hearing on Vacation of an Alley Easement Lying along the front yard of lots South of 10th Avenue and West of Prairie - Res. No . ??43 '1 : 40 p .m. Application for a Taxicab License by Shakopee Cab Company, Inc . , 1921 West 115th Avenue , Shakopee 7: 45 p .m. Application for Off Sale Liquor License by Keith Johnson dba/Valley Liquors, 1104 Minnesota Valley Mall - memo on table 81 Boards & Commissions : None 91 Reports from Staff: a] Presentation of Development Plans by State Dept of. Corrections b] Fiscal Year 1985 Preliminary LAWCON/LCMR Application c ] Proposed Development Moritorium as Related to Racetrack - Ordinance No. 144 d] ' North-South Collector for Racetack e] Award Contract for JEJ Drainage of Former Railroad R-O-W - coming Monday f] Table Contract for Tahpah Park Sewer and Water g] Award Contract for 1984 Curb , Gutter, Sidewalk and Driveway Apron Replacement - Res. No. 2245 h] Approve Final Payment to Hardrives Tnc. for County Road 83 Widening - coming Monday i] Modify Car Allocation for Engineering Department for 1984 Construction Season - coming Monday I j ] Holmes Street Sidewalk Replacement *k] Insurance Deductibles *11 Application for Gambling License by St . Mark ' s Church *m] Application for Raffle License by Third Congressional District DFL n] Approve bills in the amount of $325 , 951 . 94 o] Employment Agreement Renewal - tabled 4/3/84 p] Moritorium/Taxicab Licensing i —= i f 101 Resolutions and Ordinances: *a] Res. No. 2247 - Apportioning Special Assessments Among Parcels Located North of County Road 16 (Shakopee Cable Head End Site) *b] Res. No. 2246 - Authorizing the Disposal of Unclaimed Property *c] Res. No. 2241 - Initiating the Vacation of Part of Shurnway Street Between First and Second Avenue , According to the Plat of Shakopee City, Scott County, Minnesota *d] Res. No. 2242 - Initiating the Vacation of the Public Alley in Block 1 , According to the Plat of Terrence Addition to the City of Shakopee , Scott County, Minnesota 1. 11 Other Business : a] Racetrack contractor may be working around the clock to complete the facility in time for 1985 racing - noise ordinance . b] c] 12] Adjourn to Tuesday, April 24, 1984 at 7 :00 p .m. John K. Anderson City Administrator i t OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APRIL 3, 1984 Mayor Reinke called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. , with Cncl. Colligan, Lebens, Vierling, Wampach and Leroux present. Also present were Julius A. Coller, II, City Attorney; John K. Anderson, City Admr ; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk and Judi .Simac, City Planner. Leroux/Vierling moved to recess to conduct an HRA meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Lero ux moved to re-convene at 7:08 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Liaison reports were given by Councilmembers. Cncl. Lebens reported on a complaint she received regarding the location of a garage at 503 West Fourth Avenue. The son of a neighbor to this property said he believes the garage is much too close to the sidewalk and is completely out of line with other buildings on the block and across the street. She gave fur- ther background on it. The City Admr, said he would research the matter and bring back a full staff report on it. Cncl. Wampach reported on his meeting with the senior high rise representatives. II He asked the City Admr. to report on the status of the stove which previously was scheduled for replacement, and now is apparently fixed. Cncl. Wampach also had a SPUC report wherein SPUC rates and NSP rates were com- pared for winter and summer, and SPUC is lower. Mayor Reinke asked if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council on any item not on the agenda, and there was no response. Colligan/Wampach moved to approve the minutes of March 13, 1984 and March 19, 1984 as kept. Roll Call: Ayes.; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Vierling/Lebens moved to refer the letter from DNR regarding shoreline manage- ment to the Planning Commission. Motion carried unanimously. Wampach/Leroux moved in reference to tax-exempt industrial revenue bonds (IDB's) to support the following position of the National League of Cities to oppose any volume limitation, oppose any restrictions on public purpose bonds, support an exemption for areas of severe economic distress, and support restrictions in other areas which leave max. flexibility to local governments & include provisions to: (1) redefine IDB's, (2) exempt areas of severe economic distress, and (3) provide some alternative to a volume cap as follows: (1) Redefine the definition of "private purpose" IDB's so that no restrictions are imposed upon the issuance of bonds by state and local governments for certain resource recovery, energy, multifamily, or clean water facilities; or where: (a) no private entity is considered the owner of the project for federal income tax purposes, and no private entity is therefore, entitled to depreciation deductions or investment tax credits; (b) the state or local government retains or exercises substantial operational or functional control over the project, and; (c) the state or local issuer has made, or reasonably expects to make, funds or other assets available to secure the payment of a significant part of the debt service on such bonds indepen- dent of any lease rentals or other amounts provided by a single private entity using or occupying a major portion of the facility; (2) Exempt areas of severe economic distress from any new IDB limitations; and (3) For all other bonds consider volume cap alternatives that permit a state or local issuer to choose between three alternatives in nondistressed areas: (a) Hand contribution: The issuer would be required to make a cash contribution equal to one percent of the face value of the bond. The contribution could be made from federal funds; or 4 Shakopee City Council April 3, 1984 Page 2 (b) Soft contribution: State and local issuers should be permitted to use IDB's as part of local exonomic development programs. A commitment of resources equal to five percent of the amount of the bond issue would be required for normal redevelopment acti- vities in an area contiguous to the project or facility; or (c) Restrictions on Cost Recovery: where an issuer would not or could not make a contribution, IDB financed property subject to current law ACRS restrictions would be restricted to straight- line recovery over longer lives. Property for which full ACRS is currently peamitted would be unaffected. Motion carried with Cncl. Lebens opposed. Mayor Reinke said he is sending letters of thanks to persons and groups who supported Shakopee as the site for the racetrack. He asked all to let him know the names of any he might have missed. Leroux/Vierling moved to re-consider Resolution No. 2224, A Resolution Approving the Final Plat of Prahm-Coll First Addition. Motion carried unanimously. The City Admr. pointed out the additions to the requirements of F and G in the Developers Agreement, having to do with installing parking signs and street lights. Cncl. Wampach said that SPUC requests that the street lighting not go up at this time, but to wait for the alignment of the new street to be sure of the placement. Cncl. Colligan said the ballroom is expected to be open in July. The City Engineer stated that the street is proposed for 1984, and if the street light is put up now, it could get in the way of construction. Further discussion continued. The City Admr. said he would request a letter from SPUC stating their request for a delay and reasons, so that it can be documented and referred to the concerned public. Leroux/Wampach moved to amend Resolution No. 2224 by adding the following to the Developers Agreement: F. No Parking Sims - shall be installed on the north and south sides of Fourth Avenue which extend 100 feet beyond the East and West property lines. G. Street Lights - shall be installed on the East and West property lines where they abut Fourth Avenue, according to SPUC standards. Roll Call: Ayes; Wampach, Leroux, Lebens, Vierling, Reinke Noes; None Abstain: Colligan Motion carried. Wampach/Vierling moved to approve Resolution No. 2224, A Resolution Approving The Final Plat of Prahm-Coll First Addition, as amended. Roll Call: Ayes; Vierling, Leroux, Wampach, Reinke, Lebens Noes; None Abstain: Colligan Motion carried. The City Planner explained the problem that was created for the developers of Fox Run with the addition of Condition No. 9 by the City Council regarding the length of the cul-de-sac. Cncl. Leroux responded with his concerns re garding a long cul-de-sac. He said this cul-de-sac is a continuation of a cul-de-sac which lies in Prior "Lake, so therefore, the length is not 600 to 1000 feet, but actually 2500 to 3000 feet. He is concerned with the liability of the City to provide fire and police pro- tection. Because of the land south of the development being in ag preserve, there is no way a connection to CR42 will soon be made. He doesn't have much of a problem with only two lots, but when 11 lots are concerned that involves a lot of people who may not know the potential problem of access. Mr. Corrigan, developer, asked if the condition regarding the limitation of the cul-de-sac could be attached to the Final Plat rather than the Preliminary Plat. Consensus of response was that would be poor planning and control. Mr. Corrigan said this is a unique parcel of property because it is surrounded by Prior Lake, and he has no recourse to their actions. He is concerned about Prior Lake pushing the issue of sewer in the area. He was told Prior Lake wants to annex that area to join the two roads, and they are also concerned about the length of the cul-de-sac. Discussion continued regarding protection for future buyers of the property, with the suggestion of attaching a warning to the abstract. Shakopee City Council April 3, 1984 Page 3 Discussion followed regarding how long a Preliminary Plat is good for before it has to have a Final Plat. The Preliminary has to be renewed annually, but the City Attorney said there is no limitation on how many times it can be renewed. The City Admr. said the existing short-term planning process in the current or- dinance works against logical long term planning, penalizing the developer for working with a larger parcel. If he final plats it, in 3 years he has to pay full taxes on it. Leroux/Vierling moved to re-consider the Preliminary Plat of Fox Run. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Lebens moved to change Condition No. 9 to approvethe preliminary plat for the development of two lots (Block 1, Lots 1 and 2), with approximately 600 feet of road to be constructed to serve the two lots. The City Attorney said this basically changes the plat, and he would suggest it go back to Planning Commission for consideration and approval. The City Admr. clarified that with this approval for two lots, he doesn't see any circumstance where it can be made into 11 lots without coming back through the re-platting process before Planning Commission and City Council. Mr. Corrigan asked for further clarification on the motion. He explained the reason the platting process was undertaken as it was, was because the parcel is 32 acres and if it is made into two lots, one will be under 20 acres. Further discussion ensued. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Corrigan said the main problem of this parcel is that it does not have ac- cess to a public road. He said he wanted to connect to CR21, but Shakopee will not allow him because of the length of the cul-de-sac. He asked about making flag lots to Martindale Drive. The City Planner suggested adding to the Preliminary approval Conditions No. 1 through No. 8, exclusive of No. 7, which were a part of the Preliminary Plat for the 11 lots of Fox Run. Leroux/Lebens moved to include Conditions No. 1 through No. 8, exclusive of No. 7, which were a part of the Preliminary Plat for the 11 lots of Fox Run. Motion carried unanimously. [Listed in March 19, 1984 Council Proceedings] . Mr. Keith Johnson addressed the Council explaining that he hopes to take over Valley Liquors, Minnesota Valley Mall, and he lust wanted to introduct himself and answer any questions the Council might have of him, because he will be out of town on April 17, 1984 when Council considers his liquor application. He answered a few questions, saying basically he doesn't plan any immediate changes, as he would like to run the business for a while before changing anything. Leroux/Vierling moved to remove from the table appointments to SPUC. Motion carried unanimously. Council received a letter from Wally Bishop explaining that he wished to place his name in consideration for another three-year term to the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. Discussion ensued regarding whether or not Wally Bishop's name should be included with the two previous applicants for appointment to SPUC. Lebens/Wampach moved to waive the two week time period for consideration of a nominee, because there has been so much time spent already on this item, and it is not fair to the applicants to not have it settled. Motion carried unanimously. Lebens/Wampach moved to nominate Wally Bishop for appointment to SPUC. Leroux/Vierling moved to close nominations. Motion carried unanimously. The City Clerk passed out ballots, collected them and announced a tie: Bishop: Lebens, Reinke, Wampach Gorman: Leroux, Vierling, Colligan Results of second ballot: Bishop: Reinke, Lebens, Wampach Gorman: Colligan, Vierling, Leroux Discussion was held regarding various ways to break the tie and decide on one applicant. It was decided to place three ballots, one for each applicant, in a container and draw for one. i I Shakopee City Council April 3, 1984 Page 4 Three slips of paper, each bearing the name of one of the applicants, [Bishop, Gorman, Kephart] were placed in a box and the City Clerk drew one name, which was Gorman. Leroux/Vierling moved that a unanimous ballot be cast for Randy Gorman for appoint- ment to SPUC. Motion carried with Cncl. Wampach opposed. Gary Eastlund, of Scottland Properties, addressed the Council to thank all in- volved for all the efforts made to help locate the racetrack in Shakopee. Colligan/Wampach moved to approve the purchase of a Stang Monitor with Siamese clapper and pressure gauge from Clarey's Safety Equipment for $1,591.20. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried , I Colligan/Wampach moved to approve the purchase of 800 feet 5 inch polyurethane lines hose from Conway Fire and Safety for $760.00 per 100 feet lengths, for a total of $6,080.00. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Leroux/Wampach moved to approve the request of Perry Cheever to borrow 56 hours of vacation and 24 hours of sick leave, if needed, because of an unexpected family illness. Motion carried unanimously. Considerable discussion took place regarding the procedure and necessity of hiring temporary employees because of the anticipated additional staff time necessary because of the racetrack construction. Cncl. Lebens expressed her concern about the City incurring any expenses on behalf of the racetrack. She wants to be sure those full charges are passed on to the developer. She also questioned the City staff promoting such developments, which she feels should be done by the developers themselves. Mayor replied that staff time for work done in the normal platting process is being charged to the developer. He said the general contractor plans to break ground in May or June, and prior to that building permit fees will have to be paid, so the City will be receiving that money quite soon. Cncl. Leroux responded to the philosophical question of whether or not a City should promote itself. He said Shakopee is in tough competition with other cities that are actively promoting their locations. He feels it is perfectly right for a City to promote itself, just as any business does. He believes the promotion of Shakopee for the racetrack was money well spent because of all the benefits to the City, with all kinds of additional developments probable. The City Admr. explained in more detail what type of additional help he is con- sidering hiring. Cncl. Vierling and Leroux warned against being so conservative that competent staff is lacking because of not spending enough. The City Engi- neer said the primary reason to get outside Engineering help with the racetrack development is to free-up regular staff to continue working on projects that are also important. Leroux/Vierling moved to authorize the City Admr. to exercise his existing authority to hire temporary employees to assist with the development of the Race- track within the existing pay Resolution salary standards and initially in the Engineering, Building Inspection and Secretarial areas. Motion carried with Cncl. Lebens opposed. Considerable discussion followed regarding the proposed Employment Agreement- Re- newal for the City Admr. Main items of discussion were life insurance benefits, special compensation and total salary figure. Colligan/Leroux moved to table consideration of this item and direct staff to get copies to all Councilmembers of the supporting materials provided to the negotiating committee. Motion carried unanimously. Cncl. Wampach asked that the alley in Block 50 be added to the Goals and Objec- tives for 1984. The City Admr. pointed out several areas in the draft where language changes were suggested to clarify items. i Wampach/Leroux moved to approve the Final Draft - March 26, 1984 of the Council Worksession Goals and Objectives for 1984 as amended with language changes tonight. Motion carried unanimously. i Shakopee City Council April 3, 1984 Page 5 Leroux/Colligan moved to direct staff to request proposals for appraisals of six parcels in the Trunk Highway 101 Bypass right-of-way. Motion carried unanimously. The City Engineer said he has had absolutely no adverse comments regarding the racetrack. Leroux/Colligan moved to close the public record on the Draft Environmental Im- pact Statement for the Shakopee Racetrack Site Development Proposal. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion was held regarding the timeleness of the city ' s condemnation of public right of way easterly of Prahm Coll lst Addition to permit Prahm Coll to connect to the sanitary sewer which will lie in that r-o-w. The City Engineer said the racetrack has a very tight schedule for construction, and it would be complicated and expensive to separate the condemnation proccedings for acquisition into two separate actions. Leroux/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2239, A Resolution Ordering the Prepara- tion of a Report on the Improvement of the North-South Collector Street by Road- way in Section 5, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, and moved its adoption. The City Admr. summarized the resolution. Roll Call: Ayes; Colligan, Vierling, Reinke, Wampach, Leroux Noes; Lebens Motion carried. Colligan/Wampach offered Resolution No. 2240, A Resolution Ordering t17e Prepara- tion of a Report on the Improvement of a Roadway Connecting the Southerly Terminus of Valley Park Drive and County Road 83 at the Southwest Corner of Valley Park Third Addition, and moved its adoption. The City Admr. summarized the resolution. Roll Call: Ayes; Wampach, Leroux, Reinke, Vierling, Colligan Noes; Lebens Motion carried Leroux/Lebens moved that when. Council adjourns, it adjourns to Thursday, April 12, 1984 at 7:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Cncl. Leroux said that Jim Casserly has left O'Connor and Hannon and joined Miller & Schroeder. He would like to discuss changing our bond counsel from Springsted to Miller & Schroeder. Discussion followed. Leroux/Colligan moved to invite bond consultants Springsted, Miller & Schroeder and Ellers & Assoc. to come before the City Council to propose what they can do -to best serve Shakopee. Motion carried unanimously. The City Admr. informed Council that Mr. Moonen is going to proceed with further improvements to his building, and will be closing his portion of the alley which was previously vacated. [Alley in Block 30, O.S.P. ] . Leroux/Colligan moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 11:37 p.m. Judith S. Cox City Clerk Diane S. Beuch Recording Secretary ENTERTAINMENTJOIN US AT THE *tic #40*rse f#T*#!0 FAMILY AT ITS BEST! SATURDAY 6a,ARENA RED ROOM BLUE ROOM DON BURT has been one of this country's leading professional 10- 11 a.m. Horse Gary Amundson Film Shorts horsemen (trainer, exhibitor, judge)for over 30 years. He was Presentations "Careers in Racing" Triple Crown Winners voted best judge In the nation eight times and has judged 11- 12 C.M. Horse Don Burt The Thoroughbred national and world championships In every major breed of Presentations As the Judge Donald Pierce Sees It" Journeyman Jockey horse. As a trainer he Is winner of numerous national cham- pionships In all divisions. He .is a columnist, for the national 12-1 p.m. Parade of Sharon Saare Ken Ahladeff monthly magazine Horse&Rlder and a freelance writer for nu- Breeds "Equipment and "The First Time merous other periodicals.He Is author of a book series entitled, Endurance Race Horse Owner" Riding' As The Judge Sees It(western division and Arabian showing), and currently publishing The ABCs of Winning. He Is also pub- Presentations "Confirmation& "The Nuts&Bolts 4 y Yg 1-2 p.m. Horse Sharon Saare John Townsend lisher of E ulletter, a month) analysis serving the entire horse Selection of of Harness Industry.Mr. Burt has lectured at a number of universities In the Endurance Racing" United States, as well as conducted workshops and clinics in the USA, Canada, Mexico, New Zealand, Australia, Ireland, 2-3 p.m. Don Burt Roger Hauge Keeneland Tape England and Austria. President of Equestrian Consultants,Inc., "Investing in Handicapped Film Horse for Halter& Race Horses/ a company specializing In the planning and development of Performance'' Syndicating" equestrian facilities throughout the United States. 3-4 p.m. Gary Amundson Film Shorts "Careers in Triple Crown Winners Racing" KENNETH ALHADEFF Is President of Washington Concessions, 4-5 p.m. Horse Style Show at The Thoroughbred Inc., Vice-President and Director of Facilities at Longacres Presentations 4:30 Donald Pierce Race Track(Renton,Washlnton),and Is part of a three-member Journeyman Jockey Alhadeff team that shares the management responsibilities of -6 P.M. Horse Olympic Film the Washington Jockey Club. Involved In track operations and Presentations ''Riding for Thoroughbred racing for over 20 years. Ken Is nationally re- 5America'• cognized for his expertise In food and beverage management. 6-7 p.m. Horse Paso Fino Film He Is an active Thoroughbred owner and breeder, and a part Presentations owner In a multiple graded stakes winner, Regal Bearing. SUNDAY ARENA RED ROOM BLUE ROOM GARY AMUNDSON has been coordinator of the University of 10-11 C.M. Horse Ken Ahladeff Arizona's Race Track Industry Symposium for six years at the "The Presentations he Impact of Tucson.He has presented seminars on racing to groups related ' 11- 12 O.M. Horse Don Burr Thoroughbred to Greyhound, Harness, Quarter Horse and Thoroughbred in- Presentations Stable Design Racing on a Com- ''Building the Place munity,Economic- dustrles throughout the USA, Canada and Australia. This in- Your Horse Sleeps'' ally,Culturally, " cludes track operators, horsemen,jockeys,drivers, regulatory Environmentally p 1 Y 9 Y people and breed registries. 12-1 p.m. Parade of Sharon Saare Keeneland Tape Breeds "Mechanics of the Handicapped Film Trail System,& ROGER L.HAUGE graduated from the University of Minnesota In Trail Riding 1964, and from the William Mitchell College of Law in 1970. 1-2 p.m. Horse Sharon Saare John Townsend Until mid-October 1983,he was President of Citizens State Bank Presentations "Special "The Nuts s Y Bolts Presentation" of Harness of St. Louis Park. He Is current) a partner In the law firm of Racing" Dorfman&Hauge,Minneapolis,and President of Networth Part- 2-3 p.m. Don Burt nership,Inc.,a wholesale securities brokerage firm.He Is Chair- "Training Tips, man of the Board of Castlewood Arabians. Networth has syn- Techniques.,, dlcated Arabians and Is now reachin out Into the and secrets 9 Thoroughbred Industry.He Is a member of AHSA and,under the 3-4 p.m. Roger Hauge Film Shorts farm name of Wlndsong Arabrians, Inver Grove Heights, he "Investing in Triple Crown Winners Race Horses/ breeds Arabians, half Arabians and National Show Horses. Syndicating" 4-5 p.m. Horse Style Showa The Thoroughbred Presentations 4:30 Triple Crown Winners 5-6 p.m. Horse Olympic Film SHARON SAARE co-owned and operated the largest com- Presentatlons ''Riding for America'' mer!cal horse ranch In northern California, handling 8,500 head In six years.She operated a horse breeding program from 1955 through 1974, with peak years Involving 100 mares an- nually.Ms.Saare has shown In halter and western performance classes for nearly 20 years. She became Interested In endur- ance riding In 1965 and completed the 100-mile Tevis Cup In a one day ride In 1967. Since that time, she had twice com- pleted the Tevis Cup as well as six other one-day 100 milers, the Florida three-day 100-mile competitive ride, 50-mile en- RECEPTION durance rides In 12 states, and two 60-milers In Australia and The Minnesota Horse Council and Minnesota Horse Exposition, a 40-mile ride In England. Ms.Saare Is being co-sponsored Inc., have planned an informal reception for up to 400 horse- by Millers'of New Jersey. men at the Holiday Inn/Central (1313 Nicollet Mall, Minneap- olis) for Saturday evening, April 14th (7:00-10:00). This recep- tion is open to the public for a nominal charge of$5 per person (with a cash bar).An invitation has been sent to Governor Rudy JOHN A. TOWNSEND graduated from the College of Wooster, Perpich and all members of the Minnesota Racing Commission. holds a law degree from the University of Pittsburg,and a MBA All speakers mentioned above have agreed to be present.This degree from the Graduate School of Business, Stanford Uni- informal event is yet another opportunity for horsemen of dif- versify,Stanford,California. In 1970 he was Vice President and ferent backgrounds (and the otherwise interested) to meet General Manager of The Meadows pari-mutuel harness race and socialize. If you wish to attend, please send your name, track near Pittsburgh,and served as President of that track from address and $5 to the Minnesota Horse Exposition, Inc., in An- 1973 through 1982. He has participated In every phase of the oka. Reservations will also be taken off the Expo floor on April sport of harness racing: owner, breeder, trainer, driver, track 13 and 14 until filled. No tickets will be issued. Please check manager and President. He has been a director of the United In at the door upon arrival. States Trotting Association and serves on the Executive Com- We hope you enjoy Expo '84! mittee of mutuel tracks In the USA and Canada. This is a Minnesota Horse Council sponsored activity. MINNESOTA HORSE EXPO INC. 6250 Front St. NW Anoka, MN 55303 (612) 421-2936 1�kl 1 ' Oil to FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT AT ITS BEST! II V t q 4 ` � x S �y 6h- " VIII I - league of minnesota cities April 2, 1984 TO: All Members (c/o Mayors, Managers, Clerks) SUBJECT: 1984 Nominations for LMC Board of Directors Each year at this time, members of the LMC Nominating Committee meet to consider candidates for election to the LMC Board of Directors. I would like to encourage you to participate in that selection process at the very outset by requesting your advice in suggesting candidates to be considered for nomination. The Nominating Committee will recommend four nominees to the Board this year. Those nominations will be announced at the 1984 LMC Annual Meeting, scheduled during the LMC Annual Conference in June. The date of the LMC Annual Meeting is Thursday, June 14. The meeting will take place at the Duluth Arena, Duluth, MN. The Board positions that expire June, 1984 are four 3-year term memberships. The committee will also consider nominees to fill any Board vacancies that may occur. The committee will also recommend nominations for LMC Officers. Officers of the League of Minnesota Cities are elected annually by the membership at the LMC Annual Meeting. Mayor Robert Anderson of International Falls currently serves as LMC President; Adrian Herbst, Council Member of Bloomington is Vice President. Guidelines followed by the Nominating Committee are enclosed with this letter, along with a listing of current members of the LMC Board of Directors and Officers. The guidelines have been developed over the years as a result of the deliberations of previous Nominating Committees. President Anderson will be completing his appointments to the nominating committee within the next two weeks and the first meeting of the Nominating Committee will be mid-May. A second meeting will be held at the LMC Annual Conference. It would be helpful to have your comments and advice as soon as possible. In order to assist in that process, I suggest that you call a member of the nominating committee or me. If you are aware of an official of a LMC member city who you view as a strong candidate for nomination, please provide his/her name and a brief resume of qualifications. That information may be sent to the League Office, attention: Helen Schendel. This communication may be as formal as you prefer. The LMC Nominating Committee will conduct interviews with each candidate on June 13th, during the LMC Annual Conference. (OVER) I 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 C6121227-5600 1984 Nominations LMC Board of Directors Page 2 The nominating committee's goal is to assure that every qualified candidate is considered. Even if the city official you nominate is not aware of your suggestion, you may certainly put the individual's name forward for consideration. The Nominating Committee, as a regular part of procedure, will confirm with that person whether to present his/her name to the Annual Conference. On behalf of the 1984 LMC Nominating Committee, I want to thank you for your assistance and assure you that all suggestions will be seriously considered. Sincerely, Helen Schendel Associate Director Enclosure HS:glb rr ,� IIII 1111 league of minnesota cities GUIDELINES 1. Geographic and Population Size Representation There has been a conscious effort to see that different parts of the state are represented on the Board, as well as the different sizes of cities that are among the League's constituency. 2. Twin Cities Area/Outstate Balance While there are no specific seats on the Board reserved for Twin Cities area or outstate members, it has been a consistent practice to maintain a rough balance of Board members from these areas. 3. Elected/Appointed Balance Traditionally both elected and appointed municipal officials have participated in all aspects of the League's activities, including membership in the Board of Directors. Although no specific number of seats on the Board are reserved for elected as distinct from appointed officials, it has been a consistent practice to have a majority of the Board composed of elected officials. Furthermore, there has been some effort to provide an opportunity for a variety of appointed officials (e.g. , clerks, city managers, attorneys, assessors, etc.) to serve on the Board. 4. Rotation of Membership In view of the fact that the League has more than 750 member cities any individual who serves a full term on the Board is not normally considered for another Board term. However, persons with Board experience are often considered as potential officers. I 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 CO1 2) 227-5000 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF LEAGUE 1983-1984 Terms of Office President: Robert Anderson, Mayor, International Falls Elected by membership, June, 1983 Term expires, June, 1984 Vice-President: Adrian Herbst, Councilmember, Bloomington Elected by membership, June, 1983 Term expires, June, 1984 Directors: C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor, Edina Elected by membership, June, 1981 Term expires, June, 1984 Morris Lanning, Mayor, Moorhead Elected by membership, June, 1981 Term expires, June, 1984 Steven Perkins, Mayor, Pipestone Elected by membership, June, 1981 Term expires, June, 1984 Chuck Hazama, Mayor, Rochester Elected by membership, June, 1983 Term expires, June, 1984 Bill Bassett, City Manager, Mankato Elected by membership, June, 1982 Term expires, June, 1985 Betty Bell, City Clerk, Coon Rapids Elected by membership, June, 1982 Term expires, June, 1985 Richard Johnson, City Clerk, Brainerd Elected by membership, June, 1982 Term expires, June, 1985 Mary Anderson, Councilmember, Golden Valley Elected by membership, June, 1983 Term expires, June, 1985 Patricia Bonniwell, City Clerk-Treasurer-Administrator Dassel Elected by membership, June, 1983 Term expires, June, 1986 (OVER) BOD Terms of Office - page two James Miller, City Manager, Minnetonka Elected by membership, June, 1983 Term expires, June, 1986 Kathy O'Brien, Alderman, Minneapolis Elected by membership, June, 1983 Term expires, June, 1986 Elizabeth Witt, Couincil Member, Mendota Heights Elected by membership, June, 1983 Term expires, June, 1986 Ex-Officio: Jack Irving, City Manager, Crystal President, Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, June, 1983 Term expires, June, 1984 NLC Vice-President: George Latimer, Mayor, St. Paul Term expires, December, 1984 LMC Immediate Past President: Vacant AH:rmm 6/21/83 A local area office of the Minnesota Department of Economic Security 4, EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING DIVISION Phone: 297-2899 Teletypewriter Number: 612/296-3711 APR 10 9984 4-9-84 Mr. Eldon Reinke, Mayor CITY C'7 City of Shakopee 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mayor and City Council Members: The Shakopee Job Service/WIN office at 129 E. 1st Avenue since May, 1982 wishes to take this opportunity to thank !-he City of Shakopee for their Public Service in providing space for this office. This joint use office serves the general public in obtaining iobs through contacts with area employers and offers other services such as job seeking skills, resume preparation, and referral to supportive services. The area employers are offered current qualified applicants from a local office setting. The efforts to keep this office in the Shakopee area have been a great help to local unemployed people who would otherwise have had to drive to Hopkins or Bloominton to obtain help in seeking employment. We hope to be able to continue serving rhe community now and in the future. Again we offer a heartfelt thank you for this donaf:ed office space. tnpt�� Shakopee-'Job Service JOBr BALANCE OF STATE CETA DISA OIL I TY DETERMINATION ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY SERVICEr LABOR MARKET INFORMATION SHELTERED EMPLOYMENT STATEWIDE CETA COORDINATION r VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE WORK INCENTIVE An Equal Opportunity Employer -�"J DES 16R(Rev.9/1/78)(SN-00457) '�iY act,ion� Ier league of rninnesota cities RESIDENCY REQUIREMENTS On Friday, March 30, the Senate Local and Urban Government Committee passed S.F. 2091 (Taylor) which would prohibit all cities and counties from imposing residency requirements on their employees. The bill's companion, H.F. 322 (Piepho) has also received committee approval and is on the House floor. The bills, as originally introduced, would have allowed cities to restrict employees only to the school district encompassing the city. The House Committee amended H.F. 322 to allow a 10-mile restriction and a Minnesota residency restriction. The Senate altered the bill to simply prohibit residency requirements. A 1981 law prohibits residency requirements in the metropolitan area, and the Senate bill. merely extends the prohibition. If you feel that local control should be retained or favor residency requirements please contact your senators and representatives. The League is trying to at least get clarifying language allowing a city to impose a response time or area restriction if it is a relevant job necessity (such as for police and fire employees and snow plow operators) . COMPARABLE WORTH On Friday, March 30, the Senate Employment Committee heard S.F. 1687 (Berglin) which would have required cities to undertake job evaluation studies. At the urging of local government representatives, the committee amended the bill to "encourage" rather than "require" cities, counties, and schools to begin adopting comparable worth pay systems. The bill now goes to the Senate Finance Committee. The House Local and Urban Affairs Committee will hear the bill Thursday, April 5 and will vote on it Monday, April 9 at 12:00 in Room 83. Action on the floors is also likely. Please contact your legislators and advocate the League position of Tassing a permissive, not mandatory. bill that addresses the issue of comparable ow`rtE 1in a cooperative manner through solid provisions eliminating or modifying barriers to pay equity and encouraging local units to examine the issue and address it in a fashion suitable for local conditions. Please contact the League if you have questions regarding this issue, proposed legislation, and/or the League's policy. -more- 1 80 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (01 2) 227-5600 I -2- 6 PROGRESS REVIEW LEGAL NOTICE In the past week, both the Senate and House Local and Urban committees held hearings on S.F. 1298/H.F. 1302, the Minnesota Newspaper Association's Legal Notice Bill. Both committees passed nearly identical bills. The League and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities strongly opposed a section of the bill which would have required the city to publish at least a summary of all council proceedings in the city's legal. newspaper. The -, small cities association did not testify on the bill even though small cities with part-time clerks would have been inordinately affected. The AMM and the LMC were successful in at least getting an amendment on the bill which requires a city, within a 30-day period following a meeting (either regular or special) , to publish the official council proceedings, a summary of the proceedings conforming to the bill's requirements, or a condensed version of the official minutes. The House committee deleted a provision allowing the publication of an agenda describing each item which came before the council at that meeting and including the title of every ordinance or resolution the council adopted, in favor of the more general language allowing for publication of a condensed version of the official minutes. It is unclear at this time whether an agenda indicating council action on particular items would meet the statutory requirements. Smaller cities should be particularly interested in finding out that townships, even those exercising urban powers, are excluded from the publication section of the bill. An amendment, offered by Representative Virgil Johnson, which would have deleted the publication of proceedings section, was defeated by the House committee. There may be amendments offered on the House floor which either delete the section or limit its applicability to cities over a certain population. Another section of the bill would allow line rates for legal publications, which are currently set by statute at 24 cents per line to increase by a maximum of 10 percent annually. The argument the newspapers put forth is that they have in effect been subsidizing legals for the last few years and that it is inappropriate for the Legislature to specify what a newspaper may charge. To make this argument on behalf of newspapers, which hold virtual monopolies, while requesting legislation mandating cities to publish information of questionable value is wholly inconsistent. The Legislature has ignored the inconsistency to this time, however, and there is little hope that the state Senators and representatives will recognize the inconsistency and/or act to remedy the situation. What you should do as city officials If you feel that this legislation imposes,an expensive, useless mandate r aM . on" cities. let your legislctori lthow. Ydu�` +�btigist`s have been informed that very few legislators have received comments stating concern with the bill. If you need additional information call the League or AMM. We expect the Legislature to take quick action so please do not delay if you hope to have any impact. JJ:rmm 4/6/84 s CITY OF SHAKOPEE ,ewe INCORPORATED 1870 129 E. First Ave. - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650 FSP I.( _ l;Y April 10, 1984 Senator Robert Schmitz The State Capitol Room 235 St . Paul , MN 55155 Re : Recent Legislative Committee Actions . Dear Senator Schmitz : The League of Cities has called our attention to three Bills recently acted upon by House and Senate Committees . The first , S . F. 2091 [Taylor] , and If. F. 322 ( Iliepho ) would prohibit all Cities and Counties from imposing residency requirements on their employees . This prohibition is too all encompassing and the City of Shakopee urges you to support a Bill that would get clarifying language allowing a City to impose a response time or area restriction if it is a relevant job necessity [ such as for Police and Fire employees and snowplow operators ] . The second Bill we are concerned about is S . F. 1687 [ Berglin] which would require Cities to undertake job evaluation studies for comparable worth . The City of Shakopee urges you to support a Bill that would provide permissive language , not mandatory language , addressing the subject of comparable worth studies by local governments . The third Bill the City is concerned about is S . F. 1298 and H.F. 1302 , the Minnesota Newspaper. Association ' s Legal Notice Bill . These Bills are identical and require the City to publish at least a summary of all City Council Proceedings in the City ' s Legal Newspaper. Currently, the City of Shakopee prints the minutes of all its meetings In the Shakopee Valley News . This law is not required for those communities , and their elected officials , that wish to have meeting minutes or summaries published . It is simply a law which will provide additional business for the Minnesota Newspaper Association ' s members . In our Municipal Caucus meeting, not one of our 25 members has ever had a problem with their citizenry about pub- lishing official minutes . Some communities choose to do it and others do not . 7h r 7 ress 2 c u An Equal Opportunity Employer Recent Legislative Committee Actions . Page 2 April 10, 1984 Shakopee ' s City Council has taken a formal position regarding comparable worth , and that is reflected in the statement above . Council will be acting on the residency requirement and legal notice requirements at their next regular meeting on April 17 , 1984 . Because the Legislative Session is drawing to a close I felt it necessary to respond to the direction being taken in these Bills the day I received notification from the League of (;ities . If you have any questions regarding the City ' s pos tion on theses Bills , please contact me . Sincerely , John K. Anderson �--= City Administration JKA/bn cc : Rep. Chuck Dimler � d ROBERT J. SCHMITZ Senator 36th District 6730 Old Hwy. 169 Blvd. Jordan, Minnesota 55352 #��'P— Senate Office: 235 State Capitol St. Paul. Minnesota 55155 Phone: 296-7157 APR 12 198A State of Minnesota CITY C?f. - r April 11 , 1984 E i_ Judith S . Cox City Clerk City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee , Minnesota 55379 Dear Judith : Thank you for your letter in regard to SF 1298/HF 1302 , requiring cities to publish all council proceedings in local newspapers . HF 1302 was substituted for SF 1298 . Several amendments were offered in committee which took the form of a compromise . There may be floor amendments during discussion on the Senate floor . Many small cities have expressed deep concern about the cost of publishing their minutes in oDmplete or summary form. Thank you again for writing . Sincerely, ROBERT J . SCHMITZ Chairman Senate Local & Urban Government Committee RJS/st COMMITTEES • Chairman, Local and Urban Government Rules and Administration • Finance • Transportation • Veterans and General Legislation LAI�RENT REAL ESTATE April 13 , 1984 Jean Andre Community Development Director City of Shakopee 129 Last First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Jean , Regarding our phone conversation of April 13 , 1984. I would like to express my interest in purchasing the 2 Railroad Lots on Fourth Avenue in Shakopee . I understand that it ' s the City Councils decision if these lots are to be sold and would appreciate you keeping me informed. Sincerely , lY . r Chuck Mensing 117 Fuller Street Shakopee , MN 55379 Phone : 445-1709 LAURENT BUILDING 118 S. FULLER ST. • SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 • 612-445-8151 Each office mdep-d,wN--d and open,red:' 69 ERA PEAL ESTATE a coma oam c�nay le action I rt [11 -RII LJleague of minnesota cities April 13, 1984 i TO: Mayors, Administrators, Managers and Clerks RECEVVEEO FROM: Stanley Peskar, General Counsel APR 16 1884 SUBJECT: Public Pensions CITY NAY 4 EE REQUESTED ACTION: Contact Legislators and labor leaders - say defined contribution must be part of the pension package. A surprise move to enact an major pension bill at the 1984 session was begun at a legislative commission on pensions and retirement hearing on April 12. The proposal, which did not appear on the announced agenda, has the support of the Department of Finance and is being authored by Representative John Sarna and Senator Collin Peterson, Chair and Vice Chair, respectively, of the Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement. The proposal as written seems unbelievably generous. It provides for the following benefit increases: A. Pension Guarantee. B. Rule of 85 until June 30, 1987. C. 3% reduction factors for all funds. D. Age requirement for retirement at 55 with 10 years of service, or at any age with 30 years of service. E. 100% joint and survivor death while eligible. Spouse vests for deferred benefit when member would have been eligible. F. Remove waiting periods for elected survivor benefits at disability or retirement, and the 90 day period for commencement of disability. G. MSRS correctional and PERA/P-F will earn 2.5% for first 25 years of service instead of current 2.5% for first 20 years. Rule of 75 until June 30, 1987. H. Basic members would have maximum survivor benefits raised from $700 to $1,000. Minimum amount would be raised from 30% to 50%. I. Return 1983 supplemental 2% employee contributions to members. MORE 1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (61 2) 227-5600 r April 12, 1984 Public Pensions Page 2 Financing issues would be as follows: A. Pre-Retirement Assumptions: 6.5% salary; 8% interest Post Retirement Assumptions: 5% interest B. Amortization: Level % for TRA, MSRS, PERA Level $ for Others C. Eliminate state subsidy of teacher early retirement program in F.Y. 1986. D. Contribution Rates: see attached schedule. Estimated liability changes by benefit and funds are as follows (in thousands) : MSRS- MSRS- MSRS- PERA- PERA- General Corrections Highway General P/F TRA Total 1. 3% Reduction Factors 7,470 223 223 - - 34,806 42,722 2. 55/10 or Any Age/30 10,363 - - 11,645 - - 22,008 3. Death While Eligible 6,999 535 535 9,830 2,407 - 20,306 4. Remove Waiting Period - - - - - - - 5. Equalize Accrual Rates for Correctional & P/F - 2,888 - - 13,129 - 16,017 6. 3 yr. Rule of 85 or 75 30,448 1,427 1,427 30,002 6,442 28,561 98,307 7. Survivor $700- $1000/30%-50% - - - 2,831 - 2,229 5,060 8. Return Employee 2% and Amortize 7,445 220 220 11,346 1,052 14,480 34,762 Total 62,725 5,292 2,404 65,653 23,030 80,076 239,181 Estimated total costs of benefit by benefit and fund (in thousands) : -MORE- d y R 1 U( 1 'J April 12, 1984 Public Pensions Page 3 MSRS- MSRS- MSRS- PERA- PERA- General Corrections Highway General P/F TRA Total 1. 3% Reduction Factors 871 20 20 - - 2,938 3,849 2. 55/10 or Any Age/30 1,028 - - 1,462 - - 2,490 3. Death While Eligible 600 48 48 787 217 - 1,700 4. Remove Waiting Period - - - - - - - 5. Equalize Accrual Rates for Correctional & P/F - 274 - - 1,247 - 1,521 6. 3 yr. Rule of 85 or 75 1,366 64 64 1,346 289 1,281 4,410 7. Survivor $700- $1000/30%-50% - - - 263 - 200 463 8. Return Employee 2% and Amortize 344 10 10 509 47 650 1,560 Total 4,199 417 142 4,367 1,801 5,068 15,993 As you will note, from the contribution rate changes proposed, if enacted as proposed, political subdivisions with employees in the PERA coordinated plan would stand to realize an immediate game by reduced employer contributions from the current 5�% of salary down to 4% of salary. The bill as outlined, contained no proposal to recapture any of that savings for the State of Minnesota. However, there appear to be 3 causes for concern that these apparent savings are illusory. 1) The proposed reduction in contribution rates simply means that the fund will not be 100% funded as quickly as if the current contribution rate were maintained, assuming that benefits are not raised to simply absorb whatever additional contributions are going in. Of course, the elimination of the extra 1k% of salary contribution rate for retirement of the deficit, would achieve a 50/50 employer/employee contribution rate which the League has long advocated. 2) The elimination of the employer extra contribution for the coordinated plan might be deleted in the legislative process while the promise benefits increases are left to emerge into law. 3) Some sort of provision recapturing some or all of the local government savings for the state could be added to the package on the floor or in conference committee. The finance department's interest in this package appears to be to fund the teachers retirement associations deficits by reduced contribution rates to some of the various state MORE- April 12, 1984 Public Pensions Page 4 retirement programs. What is irontic is that they have not proposed to reduce the contribution rates to the PERA police and fire fund, one of the best funded plans in the public employees systems of the state. Apparently the Department of Finance had no interest in reducing costs to local government where they felt they had no political opportunity to capture any of the savings. The package also contains a proposal for PERA to refund the extra 2% of salary withheld from employees during the fiscal crisis of 1982-83. If this is to be done, the bill should also provide for reimbursement of the fund by the state. Without reimbursement by the state, the fund (all members) are the loosers. At the time the money was extracted, all the legislators and the Governor viewed the transaction as a borrowing from the pension fund. That loan should not now be turned into theft. The entire package seems improvident in that there are very significant benefit increases at the same time as there are significant reductions in the contribution rate to the various plans aside from the teachers plans. The proposed changes in assumed rates of yield on investments have not been borne out by Minnesota public pension plan experience over the last 10 years. Thus it seems rash to predict that an 8% yield on investments will occur in the future. Wouldn't it be better to be conservative in this regard. Additionally, implementing the benefit increases proposed may create an additional acturial liability too great to permit consideration a defined contribution plan anytime in the near future. It also questionable whether the benefit to local governments derived from the dropping of the employer extra contribution rate for coordinator employees, matches the risk to the funds of implementing rule of 85 (though the proposal is to provide a 3 year window, politically, it seems unlikely that rule of 85 once granted in any form will ever be discontinued) and the 3% reduction factor for early retirement along with the other promised benefits. Thus, though the League has an official policy position in favor of discontinuance of the employer extra contribution for the coordinated plan members, unless we can assure future pension costs stability and employer personnel flexibility by implementing the defined contribution plan as a part of this package, the proposal is, on balance, likely to be detrimental to the interests of cities and other local units of government. We urge you to take immediate action to contact your Senator and Representative. Please indicate that unless a defined contribution program for present employees who elect such v coverage and for those newly hired, can be implemented as a part of the package. You oppose any changes in the pension areas until next legislative session, so that more deliberate �„y :onsideration to all factors can be given. Also urge those legislators to reduce the ��````�� contribution rate to the PERA police and fire fund. SP:glb -7 at MTIvIO TO: John K. Anderson, City Admin. i FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Vacation of Part of Drainage and Utility Easement in Lot 3, Block 1, Scenic Heights First Addition. DATE: April 12, 1984 INTRODUCTION: In 1981, when the Planning Commission considered a request from Mr. Clete Link for a variance for Outlot 1, Scenic Heights lst Addition (CR 17 at 10th Avenue) , it came up that the lot to the East had a 10 foot drainage and utility easement along the Westerly boundary and that the easement was encroached upon due to the construction of a garage. BACKGROUND: A condition of approval was that Mr. Link convey a five foot easement along the Easterly boundary of the Outlot. This easement has been conveyed which now provides, along with the original easement, a total easement of 15 feet. The property owner of Lot 3, Block 1 Scenic Heights 1st addition, Mr. Vohnontka, is desirous of having the easement encroachment vacated in order to clean up his situation, should he desire to sell his property sometime in the future. At their January 9, 1984 meeting, the Shakopee Public Utilitie's Commis- sion agreed to the vacation of three feet of the ten foot easement. On M-irch 19, 1.984, Council set a public hearing for April 17th to consider the vacation of the East three feet of the utility and drainage easement. ALTERNATIVES: a] Vacate three feet of the ten foot easement. b] Don't vacate three feet of the ten foot easement. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Offer Resolution No. 2244, A Resolution Vacating Part of a Drainage and Utility Easement in Lot 3, Block 1, According to the Plat of Scenic Heights First Addition to the City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota, and move its adoption. 137.5 -an 61 Cj— E0' t $S � ~ � } a- 1 10 r ' 9 o I � ,a ► - �l 7 go 8 v I ` `4'�t o \at3S 6) � � 161 �S ` 145.0 6C 137.5 1315_ j. Y- WEST "TM TO: Judy Cox, City Clerk FROM: Lou Van Hout, Utilities Manager DATE: February 7, 1984 RE: Easement along East side of Lot 3, Block 1, Scenic Heights lst Addition The easement described above has been involved in a controversy dating back to early 1982 when it was discovered that part of a garage had been built on the casement. The encroachment is approximately 3 feet, and the Property owner, Mr. Fran Vohnoutka, asked that the City vacate the easement. At the time this was discovered we had some overhead electric lines crossing that part of the easement so it could not be vacated. Since then we have reconstructed to underground wiring in conjunction with the new buildings on the property to the Uyest. At the January 9, 1984 meeting the Utilities Commission agreed to the vacation of 3 feet of the 10 foot easement, and asked that City Council be asked to proceed with the request by Mr. Vohnoutka. I c.c. Fran Vohnoutka RESOLUTION NO. 2244 A RESOLUTION VACATING PART OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT IN LOT 3, BLOCK 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SCENIC HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. WHEREAS, the utility and drainage easement in Lot 3, Block 1, Scenic Heights First Addition was platted and dedicated to the public use;. and WHEREAS, the property owner has unknowingly constructed a garage over the Easterly three feet of said easement; and WHEREAS, it has been made to appear to the Council that it would be to the best interests of the general public to vacate part of said easement; and WHEREAS, the Council has set a date for a public hearing at which time to consider said vacation and due notice of the hearing has been given, as pre- scribed by law; and WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard on the matter were heard at the public hearing in the Council Chambers in the City of Shakopee; and WHEREAS, the Council has been fully advised in all things. NOW, THERE-FORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 11 That it finds and determines that the vacation of the Fasterly three feet of the drainage and utility easement lying along the Westerly 1.0 feet of Lot 3, Block 1 Scenic Heights First Addition is in the public interest and serves no further public need. 21 That the Easterly three feet of the utility and drainage easement lying along the Westerly 10 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, according to the plat of Scenic Heights First Addition to the City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota, is hereby vacated, 31 After the adoption of the Resolution, the City Clerk shall file certi- fied copies hereof with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Scott County. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held thisway of 1984. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Admin. FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk C RE: Vacation of Alley Easement in Eagle Bluff 2nd Addition Between Dakota and Prairie Streets. DATE: April 12, 1984 INTRODUCTION: On March 19th Council set a public hearing to consider the vacation of an alley easement lying along the East 16 feet of Lots 1 - 7, Block 3, Eagle Bluff 2nd Addition. BACKGROUND: As the result of a pending sale of a lot in Block 3 of Eagle Bluff 2nd Addition, it has been discovered that the 16 foot alley easement was in- correctly described as the East 16 feet rather than the West 16 feet along the seven lots adjacent to Prairie Street, placing the easement in the front yards. There is an existing utility and drainage easement lying along the rear 10 feet of each lot in the sub-division. This alley easement vacation has no bearing on the utility and drainage easement. I have been in touch with all seven property owners and they are all willing to sign an easement agreement to provide a 16 foot alley easement along the West 16 feet of their lots, placing the alley easement in the rear of their lots. The easements have been drawn up by the City Attorney and have been sent to the property owners for their signature. When they are returned to the City, they will be recorded. ALTERNATIVES: a] Vacate the incorrectly described easement at this time. b] Don't vacate the easement. c] Delay vacating easement until all new easements are signed and filed with the City. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends vacating the easement so that the pending lot sale will not be held up. Delaying granting the easement serves no purpose because the alley easement itself serves no purpose. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Offer Resolution No. 2243, A Resolution Vacating the Public Alley Easement in Block 3 Eagle Bluff Second Addition to the City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota and move its adoption. 7 RESOLUTION NO. 2243 A RESOLUTION VACATING THE PUBLIC ALLEY EASEMENT IN BLOCK 3 EAGLE BLUFF SECOND ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, there exists a 16 foot alley easement lying along the Easterly 16 feet of Block 3, Eagle Bluff Second Addition; and WHEREAS, it has been made to appear to the Council that it would be to the best interests of the general public to vacate said alley easement; and WHEREAS, the Council has set a date for a public hearing at which time to consider said vacation and due notice of the hearing has been given, as prescribed by law; and WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard on the matter were heard at the public hearing in the Council Chambers in the City of Shakopee; and WHEREAS, the Council has been fully advised in all things. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 11 That it finds and determines that the vacation of the alley easement hereinafter described is in the public interest and serves no fur- ther public need as an alley. 21 That the alley easement lying along the Easterly 16 feet of Lots 1 - 7 inclusive, Block 3, Eagle Bluff Second Addition to the City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota, is hereby vacated. 31 After the adoption of the Resolution, the City Clerk shall fill certi- fied copies hereof with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Scott County. Adopted in Adj'-Reg._session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 17th day of April, 1984. Mayor of the City of S a opee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this 17th day of April, 1984. City of Shakopee 51t T POLICE DEPARTMENT 476 South Gorman Street r SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 Tel. 445-6666 TO: Mayor, Council Members FROM: Tom Brownell, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Taxicab License Application DATE: April 11, 1984 INTRODUCTION Applicant Duane Albert Flick, 1921 W. 115th Avenue, Shakopee, Shakopee Cab Company, Inc . , has applied for a license to operate a taxicab service. BACKGROUND An appropriate background investigation has been conducted Within the confines of the Data Privacy Act. Item 14 of the application requires the applicant to list all traffic violations, including dates. Applicant lists two speeding tickets, 1980 . Applicants Minnesota driver ' s record indicates eight driving violations during the year 1980 through 1983 . ALTERNATIVES 1 . Deny applicant a license to operate a taxicab company based upon filing a falsified application, reference item 14 list all traffic violations. 2 . Deny applicant a license to operate a taxicab company based upon applicants driving record of eight violations from January 1980 to November 1983, which reflects the applicants inability to operate a motor vehicle as required by Minnesota Statutes, which could endanger the safety of passengers. 3 . Grant a taxicab license to Duane A. Flick, Shakopee Cab Company, Inc . RECOMMENDATION Deny applicant a license to operate a taxicab company based upon filing a falsified application, reference item 14 list all traffic violations. go c&,(yE �:70 )DcoEect CITY OF SHAKOPEE APPLICATION FOR TAXICAB LICENSE 1 . Company Name Shakopee Cab Co. Inc. Business Phone 445-5574 2 . Company Address 1921 West 115th Ave. , Shakopee, Minn. 55379 3. Name (Last) Flick (First) Duane (Middle)_A, , 4. Present address 1921 West 115th Ave. , Shakopee, Minn. 55379 5. Address for past five years ( list address ' s and dates) Same as Above 6 . Date of birth (Month) 5 (Day) _ 29 (Year) 35 7 . Place of birth (City) Pringor ( State) _ Iowa Corporation Fed. ID 8. Marital. Status : Single Social Security No:Number Applied for 9. Are you addicted to the use of intoxicating liquor No drugs No 10. Are you currently on a liquor or drug rehabilitation program? Yesi_ No X If yes , where 11 . Have you ever been convicted of a Felony No Misdemeanor No If Yes , explain 12 . Do you have a Classified Driver ' s License obtained from the Bureau of Anp lied Automobile Examiners of the State of Minnesota fTi Lic . No . 13. Was your Minnesota Driver ' s License ever Revoked No Suspended No CancelledNo For what cause NA 14. List all traffic violations , including dates Two Speeding Tij,kets. 1980 15. Give experience in the transportation of passengers Tow truck operator Expect to hire experienced drivers 15a. Have you ever been refused a taxicab license? No By whom? NA Why - .-y"' of Shakopee +`,- _Application for Taxicab License Page -2- 16. Financial status , including the amount of all unpaid judgments and the nature of the transaction or acts giving rise to said judgments . No unpaid 1udments See financial statement attached 17 . Give any facts which you believe tend to prove that public convenience and necessity require the granting of a license . At present time there are no cab companies operating in the City of Shakopee. There are many people who wish to have a cab company so they can go places they presently cannot get rides to. - 18. Give the color scheme or insignia to be used to designate the vehicle or vehicles to be operated. Bottom of vehicle will be a neutral off white color. On the door will be Shakopee a o. , p lone num er. 19. Location of proposed depots and terminals Applicant will advise upon granting of permit subject to depots and terminals by the 20. For each car proposed to be operated upon the streets of Shakopee as a taxicab, please complete (attach additional sheets , if necessary) : LICENSE NO. SERIAL NO. YEAR MAKE REGISTERED OWNER Applicant will provide license numbers, serial numbers and year and make of each car to be used as a cab in the City of Shakopee. Each car will be subject to approval by the City subject to the ordinances. The registered owner of each of these vehicles will be Shakopee Cab Co. Inc. 21 . Company public liability insurance carried with on said vehicle(s) Casulaty Assurance will carry amount specifie�iiphttlimics orOi�ce. personal injury to one person, $ personal injury in one accident , $ property damage each accident . 22 . Other municipalities in which you are licensed: None I UNDERSTAND THAT FALSIFICATION OF ANY ITEM ON THIS APPLICATION IS SUFFICIENT REASON UPON WHICH TO BASE A DENIAL OF SAID DICE SE. Date : 3-15-84 Signature : THE SHAKOPEE POLICE DEPARTMENT WILL CAUSE AN INVESTIGATION ON EACH PERSON DESIRING TO OPERATE A TAXICAB UPON THE STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE. TO: John K. Anderosn, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director RE: Proposed New Facility for Minnesota Correctional Institution for Women DATE: April 13 , 1984 Introduction: The Correctional Institution will be presenting a proposed for a new facility to be built on the current State Farm located on a parcel bounded by Sixth, Tenth, Adams Street and St. Marks Road in Shakopee. Concurrent with their proposal, City Council may wish to consider the issue of appropriate zoning for this facility. Background: The existing correctional institutional in Shakopee is located in an R-3 (Medium-Density Residential ) district. The existing facility is not a permitted or conditional use in this district and therefore constitutes a legal, non-conforming use. The proposed new facility is in an R-2 (Urban Residential ) district which also does not permit or conditionally allow such a use. The new facility also proposes to include two silos in excess of 35 feet in height in the site plan. A conditional use permit is required to exceed a height of 35 feet in an R-2 district. State officials have expressed a willingness to initiate this process . The City has gone on record in favor of locating the new correctional facility in Shakopee, presumably with knowledge that it would be located on the state farm site. State officials have gone on record in favor of working with the City on the appropriate development of the site. With this spirit of cooper- ation, it is presumed a solution to the zoning problem can be worked out. A number of alternatives exist. 1 ) The Minnesota Attorney General has on numerous occasions issued opinions that state facilities are exempt from meeting local zoning provisions . Although this issue has never been litigated in Minnesota, court decisions in other states have supported this opinion. Although State officials have expressed an interest in working with the City, it is presumed that state officials could assume this perspective. 2 ) The City Zoning Ordinance could be amended to provide for state facilities as a permitted or conditional use in an R-2 zone. Since only one facility of this nature would ever be located in Shakopee, it does not appear this change would have broad repercussions for 1. c� future projects . The option of requiring a conditional use for the facility would place an extra burden on the state to meet additional submission requirements and could impede their construction schedule. On the other hand, local residents might feel as though they had more input if hearings were held. The main problem is that the state, at any point where an impediment is met, could choose to take the position that it is exempt from local zoning provisions . 3 ) The prison site could be rezoned, although this could be considered spot zoning, and there does not appear to be another zone which better reflects the specialized use of a state correctional facility. 4 ) The City could determine that zoning amendments should not be made and try to block the construction of the prison. Recommended Action: If state officials are willing to work with the City to 1) inform City officials and local residents of the development proposal; and 2 ) work to solve problems or concerns raised by interested parties ; it appears little would be gained by changing the code to require a more formal hearing process. Since the City is depending on the good will of state officials not to invoke its exemption from all City zoning directives, a good relationship can be developed by placing fewer impediments before the state. Requested Action: The City Council direct staff to draft a resolution. recognizing that the proposed correctional facility is a specialized use not addressed by the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance; that the proposed development plan is compatible with the sur- rounding R-2 district; and that the state cannot be held to local zoning provisions. The resolution should also request state officials to cooperate with local officials and adjacent residents to provide for a facility that is well planned and not disruptive to the City or neighborhood. " 6 TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director RE: Fiscal Year 1985 LAWCON/LCMR Preliminary Application DATE: April 13, 1984 Introduction: Fiscal Year 1985 LAWCON/LCMR (Land and Water Conservation Fund and Legislative Commission for Minnesota Resources ) Prelim- inary Applications are due April 30, 1984 . City Council consid- eration of the appropriate action regarding this grant application is requested. Background: John Anderson, George Muenchow and I met to consider possible projects to be submitted in this funding cycle. First choice was JEJ (Eastside ) Park development but this was not pursued due to the unlikelihood that 13th Avenue and the Upper Valley Drainageway would be constructed in time to parallel the park improvements . Second choice was Huber Park development but this was not pursued due to the need to solidify downtown improvements , especially the mini-by-pass, before improvements are undertaken in nearby Huber Park. Remaining alternatives to present to the Council are as follows : 1 . Submit no preapplication for FY 1985 - This option is presented due to the fact that other, more pressing priorities are consuming staff time right now. Also, the two possible projects, while worthwhile and on the 6-year capital improvement program, are not part of broader priority issues facing the City right now. 2 . Memorial Park Improvements - Elements which are proposed include providing electrical service to shelter number 2 and assisting the Chamber of Commerce in relocating a log cabin as a contact facility in the park (this involves providing for moving, foundation, electricity and other required improvements under the build- ing code. ) This later improvement would require an 87 . 5% local match to 12 . 5% grant funding under the current rules . The first element would be 50/50 grant to local match. 3 . Lions Park Improvements - Major regrading and provision of necessary additional fill to upgrade the existing sliding hill . The existing facility has significant deficiencies from both the practical/ safety and aesthetic perspectives . Landscaping in the vicinity of the hill and around the rest of the park would also be reviewed. This project would require a 50% local match, but the Lions may be willing to help contribute . Cost estimates for the total project, broken down by grant and local match, have not yet been researched for either alter- native 2 or 3 . If Council directs the pursuit of one of the alternatives a complete package with costs and necessary author- izations will be prepared for. the April 24th Council meeting. Recommended Action: Direct that no application be prepared and submitted for the FY 1985 LAWCON/LCMR (Land and Water Conservation Fund and Legislative Commission for Minnesota Resources ) grant cycle . Requested Action: Review alternative grant proposals and direct staff to prepare for Council review a package for submission in the fiscal. year 1985 funding cycle or direct that no application be submitted. ORDINANCE NO. 144, Fourth Series AN INTERIM ORDINANCE IMPOSING A MORATORIUM ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN LAND IN THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE DURING THE REVISION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE CITY PLAN AND ZONING CHAPTER 11 PREAMBLE: WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee is engaged in the revision of its Comprehensive Plan and zoning ordinance as a means for developing a plan and ordinance which best complement the development of the City considering the recent decision to locate a paramutuel race track in Shakopee; and WHEREAS, an interim zoning ordinance is necessary during the preparation of the City plan in order to protect the City from any building construction and new uses or platting; of land that may do irreparable harm to the character of existing land in the vicinity of the race track facility and defeat the purposes of the comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance, and WHEREAS, the City desires only to limit commercial, industrial and multi- family residential development (B-1, B-2, I-1, I-2 and R-4) which is in reasonable proximity to the race track facility, but does not wish to place a moratorium on low density residential development (R-1 and R-2) , and WHEREAS, proposed amendments to the City's Floodplain District have been requested by the City Engineer and amendments to the Shoreline District have been requested by the Minnesota Division of Natural Resources and both issues are already scheduled for a public hearing on April 26, 1984, with amendments to be adopted thereafter; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Racing Commission has established a strict time schedule providing for the completion of the race track and start of racing no later than June 29, 1985, and the City of Shakopee desires to facilitate the developer in meeting this deadline. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1 . MORATORIUM IMPOSED. That Chapter 4, "Construction Licensing, Permits and Regulations", Chapter 11, "Land Use Regulations (Zoning)", and Chapter 12, ,"SubdivCC- ision Regulations (Platting)" of the Shakopee City Code are hereby ^`^ L` ' ` ae a moratorium on the acceptance for processing of all applications for platting, rezoning, conditional use permits, variances and building permits in the following zoning districts: Multifamily Residential (R-4), Highway Business (B-1), Light Industry (I-1) and Heavy Industry (I-2) lying within the area bounded by County Road 17 on the west and the corporate City limits on the north, east and south. Section 2. EXISTING BUILDINGS EXCLUDED. That necessary building permits for repairs and alterations to existing buildings in all zoning districts shall be excluded from the provisions of this moratorium. Section 3. PERIOD OF MORATORIUM. That the moratorium as outlined in Section 1 shall continue for a period of ninety (90) days effective upon passage and publication of this ordinance, unless terminated earlier or extended by further acts of the City Council. Section 4. EXCLUDES REZONINGS IN PROCESS. That revisions to the existing Shoreline (S) district and Floodplain district which were initiated prior to the adoption of this ordinance shall go forward, be adopted, and take effect irrespective of this moratorium. Section 5. EXCLUDES RACE TRACK FACILITY FROM MORATORIUM. That application by the race track developers for platting, rezoning, conditional use permits, variances and building permits for that facility shall be excluded from this moratorium. Adopted in — session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, held this day of 1984. Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of 1984. City Attorney Drafted by: TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director RE: Proposed Development Moratorium as Related to the Racetrack Site DATE: April 13 , 1984 Introduction: City Council discussed the possibility of the above-listed moratorium at its April 12 , 1984 , meeting. I am attempting to summarize the points covered in that discussion and coordinate preparation of the appropriate ordinance by the legal department for Council consideration April 17th. Background: Based on Council discussion an ordinance will be drafted with language adopting a moratorium on r_ezonings , conditional use permits , variances , platting and building permits (excepting the race track facility itself and necessary permits for repairs and alterations for existing buildings ) . The moratorium will be applied to all property zoned R-4 , B-1, B-2 , I-1 or I-2 (exclud- ing AG, R-1 & R-2 ) in a geographic area bounded by County Road 17 on the west, and the city limits on the north, south and east . The City Council may also wish to include in the moratorium all parcels zoned B-2 to develop continuity in zoning for land cur- rently zoned B-2 to the east and westof CR 17 . (This latter suggestion will not be in the prepared ordinance, but will be available as an amendment. ) The ordinance will also except from the moratorium rezoning already underway to the floodplain and shoreline zones . The appropriate ordinance will not be available until Tuesday night, but will be drafted to incorporate the above- listed concepts. Council can propose amendments to alter this proposal but to avoid problems with establishing the appropriate wording from the floor, please have Council telephone proposed amendments to me in advance of the meeting so legal staff can suggest the most appropriate language to incorporate the amendment into the ordinance. Requested Action: Review and discuss moratorium, consider amendments and adopt Ordinance No. 144 . MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judi Simac, City Planner RE: Proposed Development Moratorium as related to Racetrack Decision DATE: April 10, 1984 Introduction: In thu time since the racetrack decision was made, I have leen recc,_ivinq quite a few inquiries regarding commercial and residential development within Shakopee . Although the Environ- mental Impact Statement estimated new development as a result of the racetrack location at 9 to 14 acres , there is reason to believe that there may be more than anticipated . nackground: I A couple a major inquiries have been for hotel/motel develop- ment, in which one of the sites would require a rezoning. At this time I am aware of two possible rezoning requests which may be submitted prior to April 19th, the deadline for Planning Commission review in May. In light of this , the City may want to consider a moratorium on development until a comprehensive review and possible change in plan can be made in order to achieve orderly development . We have received a legal opinion on a proposed moratorium. According to Mn . Statues 462 . 355 , Subd. 4 , the Council can implement a moratorium on huildinq permits, rezonings , conditional uses and variances to dive time to study the ramifications of the racetrack, decision on the present comprehensive plan and other official land use controls . A moratorium ordinance (see attachment ) may be effective for up to one year (with possible extensions ) and may be enacted by appropriate vote of council . Alternatives: The proposed moratorium should define exactly what applications shall be "frozen" and what geographic area of the city should be included . I . Applications : a . Rezoning b. Conditional Use C. Variances d . Building Permits (excepting necessary permits for repairs and alterations or for buildings on land already developed or platted. e . Any combination of the above II . Defined Areas : a. The entire City b. West of Holmes and north of the proposed by-pass C. Range 22 , Sections 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 15 , 16, 17, and 18 . Related Issue: Should the Council. initiate the moratorium, a comprehensive study should begin immediately and hopefully be concluded in ninety days . It may be appropriate to involve an outside planning consultant to assist in the planning or apply condition no. 2 of the Racetrack Conditional Use Permit which states that the appli- cant participate and assist the City in developing detailed land use plans for the area in and around the racetrack properties once final development begins . Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council consider establishing a development moratorium which would curtail the issuance of rezoning amendments, conditional uses , variances and building permits within an area described as Range 22 , Sections 3 , 4 , 5, 6 , 7, 8 , 9, 10 , 15 , 16 , 17 and 18 , for a period of ninety days. Further, Council should consider a comprehensive plan for said area which would be prepared by planning professionals, other than staff. Action Re uested: Move to consider on April 17, 1984 a proposed moratorium ordinance which will limit development applications for a period of ninety days in order for the City to consider its present land use legislation. Attachment Draft "Proposed Ordinance Subject To Legal Review" A Moratorium ordinance to protect the development of the City of Shakopee during the consideration of the present land use legislation and preparation of amendments to the Compre- hensive Plan and Zoning Chapter of the City Code, which regulates the use of land, location, bulk, height and use of buildings on lots and providing for the administration and enforcement of such regulations . WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee is engaged in the consideration of its present land use legislation, and WHEREAS, the moratorium is necessary to protect the city from any building construction or new uses of land that may do irrepar- able harm to the character to existing neighborhoods and defeat the purposes of the comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, said moratorium shall apply to rezoninq, conditional use, variance, and building permit (excepting necessary permits for repairs and alterations or for buildings on land already developed or platted) applications in an area defined as Range 22 , Sections 3 , 4 , 5, 6 , 7 , 8 , 9, 10, 15, 16 , 17 and 18 for a period of ninety days , effective upon passage and publication of ordinance. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 19 Mayor of the City of Shakopee MEMO TO : Mayor and Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Admin. RE : North-South Collector For Racetrack. DATE : April. 12 , 1.984 INTRODUCTION With the advent of the Racetrack, and the City ' s commitments to the track, the City must construct the North-South collector serving the northwestern entrance to the Racetrack. This parti- cular collectors street has been shown in the City ' s comprehen- sive plan and included in the City' s capital. improvement plan without listing a specific construction date . PROBLEM The City must obtain a railroad crossing from the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Co . To obtain this crossing Staff has indicated that the City would relocate an existing crossing in Shakopee . The attached letter from the City Engineer, dated March 16 , 1984, indicates that the City is willing to relocate the crossing serving Viking Steel road. The City has learned that the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Co. will accept this relocation; however, the City Engineer and I could not recall whether specific action had been taken by City Council . The purpose of this memorandum is to bring the issue before City Council for official Council action. If Council chooses to j relocate this crossing, it would affect Council ' s directive to the City Engineer to seek reopening of the road closed by Viking Steel . ALTERNATIVES 11 Pass a motion to relocate the crossing with National Survey No . 185324N at railroad mile point 26+0. 72 . To a crossing at railroad mile point 26+0. 38 . This alter- native is in keeping with the comprehensive plan and our commitment to the Racetrack. The roadway will facilitate traffic to the Racetrack, open up additional. land for development and provide an improved railroad crossing. This alternative would mean the closing of the crossing at Viking Steel road which would require the two industries served by this crossing to enter their property from 4th Avenue . North-South Collector_ For Racetrack. Page 2 April 1.2 , 1984 21 Select some other alternative crossing to relocate to the North-South collector street . This alternative would mean the closing of a crossing that is already used and which would affect a larger number of citizens . In addi- tion, it would mean that an existing street would be vacated at the crossing without the City having discussed which North-South streets in Shakopee crossing the rail- road track should be maintained. RECOMMENDATION The City Engineer and I recommend alternative number 1 for the reasons listed above . ACTION REQUESTED Pass a motion authorizing the appropriate City Officials to execute the appropriate agreement between the City and the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Co. relocating the cross- ing with National Survey No. 185324N located at mile point 26+0. 72 to a crossing at railroad mile point 26+0. 38 . i I r Al CITY OF SHAKOPEE 1� INCORPORATED 1871 129 E. First Ave. • Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650 Z' Y March 16 , 1984 I Mr. N.H. Clark Engineering Department Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Co. 275 E. Fourth Avenue St . Paul , MN 55101 Re : Public Crossing License Dear Mr . Clark: Pursuant to a conversation I had with Mr. John Zima , I am submitting this letter for the City of. Shakopee to request the relocation of a railroad crossing in Shakopee . The crossing to be relocated is the crossing with National Sur- vey No. 185324N which is at railroad mile point 26+0. 72. It is the City' s desire to close that crossing to the public and open a crossing at approximate railroad mile point 26-+0 . 38 . i The City of Shakopee would not open this railroad crossing until after construction of signals and protection devices similar to those recently installed at County Road 83 . The new crossing would be four lane roadway serving the Shakopee Industrial Park. It is my understanding that this letter will open the discussion of this crossing between the City of Shakopee and the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company. If I can supply any information that will help in the consideration of this request , please contact me at the address above or at 445-3650. Thank you for your consideration of this request . Ver truly yours , urrier City ineer HRS : cah 7 r f I) r t r c s VC, I I ri An Equal opportunity Employer v MEMORANDUM TO: John K. Anderson/City Administra r > FROM: H.R. Spurrier/City Engineer RE: JEJ Drainage of the Former Chi a o, lwaukee, St . Paul and Pacific Railroad Right-o Way Contract No. 84-3 DATE: April 17 , 1984 Introduction: Attached is a bid tabulation and a letter from Julius A. Coller, II , City Attorney, regarding the above referenced project . Background: The attached tabulation shows the apparent low bidder to be Steven M. Hentges and Sons at $45 ,656 . 13 , and the second low bid to be from Crossings , Inc . , at $48 , 160.00 . According to the attached letter from the City Attorney, the bid bond attached by Steven M. Hentges and Sons does not meet specifications re- quirement . The proposal states the following: In submitting this bid it is understood that the right is reserved by the City to reject any or all bids and to waive irregularities in bidding. Even though this language gives the City the authority to waive irregularities , doing so would cause irreparable damage to the City ' s reputation in bidding work. It would certainly produce a ( Shakopee Factor) that would be used in future bids . Although the second low bid is $2 ,503 . 87 more than the low bid, the second low conforms to specification requirements . The City is in receipt of all easement guarantees for this project . We were in receipt of those prior to April 1 , 1984. As in 1983 , the cost of this project has overrun the estimate . Below tabulated is the estimated total cost of this project in the event the bid of Crossings , Inc . is accepted and the work is awarded to Crossings . Crossings , Inc . Bid $48,160 10% Construction Contingency 4,820 Total Construction Easement (Paid) 33150 Survey (Paid) 15500 Technical Services 75210 Total 6 ,8 In my memorandum August 2 , 1983 , I had pointed out that suffici- ent funds were not budgeted for this work. At the present time there is no money budgeted for this project and in order to undertake the project , funds would have to be appropriated by amending the 1984 Appropriation Resolution to include an expenditure from the Capital Improvement Budget in the amount of $65 ,000. 00. There are three recommended actions to be taken by Council, they are as follows : 1 . To reject the bid of Steven M. Hentges and Sons for non- compliance with specification requirements . 2 . Award the contract for the JEJ Drainage of Former Chicago, Milwaukee , St . Paul and Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way, Contract No. 1984-3 , in the amount of $48 , 160.00. 3 . Direct staff to bring back a Resolution amending the 1984 Appropriation Resolution to include an expenditure of $65 ,000.00 from the Capital Improvement Fund Budget . Action Requested: 1 . A motion to reject the bid of Steven M. Hentges and Sons for noncompliance with specification requirements . 2 . A motion to award the contract for the JEJ Drainage of the Former Chicago, Milwaukee , St . Paul and Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way, Contract No. 84-3 , to Crossings , Inc . , in the amount of $48 ,160 . 00. 3 . A motion to direct staff to prepare a Resolution amending the 1984 Appropriation Resolution by including an expenditure of $65 ,000 .00 from the Capital Improvement Fund Budget . HRS : cah Attachment t 'r cJULIUS A.GOLLER, II JULIUS A.COLLER (ATTORNEY AT LAw 612-445-1244 1859-1940 2 1 1 WEST FIRST AVENUC SIIAXOPEE, MINNESOTA 55329 April 16, 1984 Mr. Henry R. Spurrier City Engineer of City of Shakopee Shakopee City Hall 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Mr. Spurrier: You ask if Bid Bonds of Steven M. Hentges and Sons Excavating, Crossings Inc, T & S Excavating Inc, and 0 & P Contracting Inc. comply with the City's requirements. In addition to the bonds, I have been furnished with a copy of the Invitation for Bids and also copies of Specifications for JEJ Drainage Project andTahpah Park Sewer and Water Project. It is noted that there is an inconsistency in the wording between invitation for Bids which provide : "All bids shall be accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check, payable to the order of the City of Shakopee for not less than $5,000.00, or 5% of the bid whichever is greater" and the specifications for both projects which are identical and provide in part : " the undersigned bidder submits herewith proposal guarantee in the form of a bid bond, certified or cashier's check in favor of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, in the amount of not less than $5,000.00 or 5% of the bid amount whichever is greater -------- The comma immediately following the figures of $5,000.00 in the Invitation is, in my opinion, inconsistent with the wording in the specifications and is confusing as it does tend to change the meaning. In any event, the wording of the specifications is controlling and clearly requires a bond or check in at least a $5,000.00 minimum sum or a bid bond for 5% whichever is greater. Al bids are under $100,000.00 so the controlling figure in the instant case is a $5,000.00 minimum. Applying the above, the T & S Excavating is in theminimum amount of $5,000.00 and qualifies under the City requirement while the bond of 0 & P Contracting Company which does not contain a minimum figure of $5,000.00 but rather just a 5% of the bid withount the minimum and hence does not qualify. The bond of Crossings, Inc. in the sum of not less than$5000.00 or 5% of the bid whichever is larger qualifies under the City requirement, while the bond of Steven M.Hentges & Sons in the sum and amount of 5% of the accompanying bid but not to exceed $50,000.00 does not qualify. I am returning herewith the specs and the bonds. Any further clarification required feel free to contact me. J'us t S'' ours, JAC/nh Enc. A ity Attorney BID OPENING April 2 , 1984 Shakopee, Minnesota 10 : 30 A.M. JEJ DRAINAGE OF FORMER CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PROJECT NO. 84-3 Planholder/Address Bid Amount Bond D. H. Blattner & Sons I South Wabasha No Bid St . Paul , MN A.R. Brisk Route 1 5% less Pierz , MN 56364 $74,885 .00 than $5000.00 Busse Const. , Inc. Willard W. Busse Belle Plaine, MN 56011 $71 ,461 . 00 $5000 .00 Bond Channel Const . Box 114 No Bid Rogers , MN 55374 Crossings , Inc . Box 10 Prior Lake , MN 55372 $48 ,160. 00 $5000.00 Bond F.F. Jedlicki ., Inc . 14203 W. 62nd St . 5% - less Eden Prairie., MN 55344 $52 ,846 .00 than $5000.00 S .M. Hentges & Sons 1523 West 3rd 5% - less Shakopee , MN 55379 $45 ,656 . 13 than $5000.00 Kusske Const . Co. , Inc. 3575 Co. Rd. 10 E. Chaska, MN 55317 $53 , 138 . 30 $5000 .00 Bond 0 & P Contracting Box 506 No Bid Osseo, MN 55369 Orvedahl Const . 7711 Country Club Drive No Bid Minneapolis , MN 55427 Prestressed Concrete 6755 Hwy 10 N.W. No Bid Anoka, MN 55303 Robertson Earth Moving Star Route 4, Box 145 No Bid Hibbing, MN 55746 MEMORANDUM TO: John K. Anderson/City Administra r FORM: H.R. Spurrier/City Engineer RE: Tahpah Park Sewer and Water S st m DATE: April 13 , 1984 Introduction: According to the contract bid April 6 , 1984, City Council was to take action to award the above referenced contract on April 17 , 1984. Background: Before the City of Shakopee can award this contract , the Shakopee Jaycee Board and General Membership must approve funding for this contract . Shakopee Jaycees have not approved that contract and may not approve that contract until after April 20th. Therefore , it is the recommendation of City staff that this contract be tabled until a future meeting so that the Shakopee Jaycees have an opportunity to approve or disapprove this contract . Action Requested : Table the award of bids for Tahpah Park Sewer and Water Service , Shakopee , Minnesota, Contract No. 84-3. HRS : cah MEMORANDUM TO: John K. Anderson/City Administ or FROM: H.R. Spurrier/City Enginee n RE: 1984 Curb and Gutter, Sidewalk and riveway Approach Replacement Program, Proj t No. 1984-2 DATE: April 13, 1984 Introduction: The City of Shakopee received bids for the 1984 Curb and Gutter, Sidewalk and Driveway Approach Replacement Program, on April 6 , 1984. Background: Apparent low bid for the work is Siehndel Construction. This firm is the firm that performed the contract work in 1983 . The firm is highly recommended and was an excellent firm to work with in 1983 . It is therefore my recommendation that the attached Resolution be adopted, awarding the contract to Siehndel Construciton, in the amount of $6 ,869. 35. Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2245 , A Resolution Awarding the Contract to Siehndel Construction for the 1984 Curb and Gutter, Sidewalk and Driveway Approach Replacement Program, Project No. 1984-2 . HRS : cah Attachment J R RESOLUTION NO. 2245 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID ON 1984 CURB AND GUTTER SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY APPROACH REPLACEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NO. 1984-2 WHEREAS , pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of 1984 Curb and Gutter Sidewalk and Driveway Approach Replacement , Public Improvement No. 1984-2 , bids were received , opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement : Siehndel Construction $ 6 ,869 . 35 Rivercity Construction 9 , 549 .45 F.A. Kelly 10 372 . 20 Halvorson Construction 1_0 , 754. 70 Victor Carlson & Sons 23 ,213 .00 AND, WHEREAS , it appears that Siehndel Construction , 210 Elmwood, LeSueur , Minnesota, 56058 , is the lowest responsible bidder . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA: 1 . The Mayor. and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Siehndel Construction, 210 Elmwood, LeSueur , Minnesota , 56058 , in the name of. the City of Shakopee for the improvement of 1984 Curb and Gutter Sidewalk and Driveway Approach Replacement Program, according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk in the amount of $6 ,869 . 35 . 2 . The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to re- turn forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids , except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed . Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota , held thisday of 1984. ----- ------ -- Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Approved as as to form this day of MEMORANDUM TO: John K. Anderson/City Administr kror FROM: H.R. Spurrier/City Engineer % RE: County Road 83 Widening Contract No. 82-1KT DATE: April 16 , 1984 Introduction: Attached is the Certificate of Completion and the Semi-Final Estimate for the above referenced project . Background: The work undertaken by Hardrives , Inc . was deficient in pavement section. As an alternative , the City agreed to accept the pavement with deficient sections so long as the road tested as a nine ton road. When the road was tested by MPM, it failed to meet the alternative strength criteria. Therefore , it is the recommendation of staff that the amount of $4 , 117 . 56 be deducted from the retainage . This amount is based on the amount of pavement that had deficient section. The reduction is based on specification revision. Since there is still $55 . 60 due the contractor, and since there is interest on that amount in the amount of $4. 84 , it is therefore recommended that final payment be made in the amount of $60 .44 to Hardrives , Inc . , as final payment for County Road 83 Widening. Action Requested: A motion to approve Final Payment to Hardrives , Inc . , 7200 Hemlock Lane North, Maple Grove , Minnesota, 55369 , for County Road 83 Widening, Contract No. 82-1KT, in the amount of $60 .44. HRS :cah Attachment ^ it CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION CONTRACT NO. : 82-1KT DATE ; April 12 , 1984 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ; County Road 83 Widening 82-1KT CONTRACTOR: Hardrives , Inc . 7200 Hemlock Lane N. Maple Grove , MN 55369 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT , , , . , , . , , . , . $ 167 , 291 . 50 QUANTITY CHANGE AMOUNT , , , , , , , , , , , , , $ 12 , 167 . 30 CHANGE ORDER NO. _ 1 THRU N0. - AMOUNT . . , $ 1 ,074 . 00 FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT , , , , , , , , , , , , , , $ 180, 532 . 80 LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS , , , , , , , , , , , , , $ 176 , 359 . 64 FINAL PAYMENT , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , $ 4 , 173 . 16 55 . 60---- 4. 84 5 . 6 _-- 4. 84 ( 8%__I_n_teres` Revised Final Pa ment : -- - I , hereby certify that the above described work was inspected under my direct supervision and that, to the best of my belief and knowledge, I find that the some has been fully completed in all respects according to the contract, together with any modifications approved by City Council , I, therefore, recommend above specified final payment be made to the above named Contractor, Profess onal Ei, ineer SEMI-FINAL PAM I Al, F"I'l h14A i'r; Contract No. 82-UTPnrtizu.l . __ . November 30, 1982 Contractor Hardrives Inc._ —1---- — -------------- - -- Address 7.200 Hemlock Lane North__Maple _Grove, MN 1 55369 Project Description —County Road 83 Widening_ - ; . �ri� incl Gontruct Ar!:.�uut 167 ,291. 50 l.I::ill,�i` t)1'ic'1' ;� �. _------�-- _ . ., --- - �.�..►1J_'LJ1L— ---- ----- 168,365.00 V11Iu1 • );• Work Compl4t.oit 180,532.80 + ,r : ui[I rig '' --2-� I' r. :,t I3�t.ai:: .: _• -3,]22-.30**. 0.00 -166-,269.47 or chu..L-, � ; 45 86 * 100_-_ er-.cenL 1-70,442.6.3_ s . r i...!•, . ..i. .its �. r *Amot;nt paid to Scott County for sign relocations . **This amount shall be placed in an interest-bearing account ' • r PAYMENT ESTIMATE No. CONTRACT NO. - City of Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Contractor: Amount of Contract: Uf,trs of Lstillwte Original �� l' From Revised r Description of Project: -- -- --- ---Contract Items 1 hall Nay Contract Item Qty . Unit Unit Price Qty. Amount Qty, Arri®ur ! wtr i n i - c h 5N-G c A,'1't2 �i50.0U r/ 77v . ,' Wli%32,i .COST SUMMARY FOR PROJECT Original Contract Amount Change Order No. 1 . $167 ,291. 50 Total Contract Amount 1 ,074.00 $168, 365.00 Total Budget Amount $197,979.00* Value of Work Completed $180,532.80 2.06 Percent Retainage 3,722. 30** Previous Payments 166,269.47 Deductions or Charges 450.86* Total $170,442.63 Value of Work Remaining $0.00 Percent Complete 100 Percent. Payment Due $10,090. 17 Budget Summary *Original Budget $200,000 Scott County (2,021) Total Budget Amount $197 ,979 J MEMORANDUM TO: John K. Anderson/City Adminisr for FROM: H.R. Spurrier/City Engineer RE: Holmes Street Sidewalk Repair �— DATE: April 13 , 1984 Introduction: Attached is an estimate of the cost of replacing sidewalk panels on Holmes Street which settled after the construction warranty had expired. Background: Staff has been advised that the City has potential liability for injuries resulting from this misaligned sidewalk. Therefore , it is recommended that this work be included in the 1984 Curb and Gutter , Sidewalk and Driveway Apron Replacement Program. As estimated the cost of replacing these panels will total $234.46 . This will replace approximately 100 sq. ft . of sidewalk. Action Requested: A motion to direct staff to include the replacement of side- walk in front of 506 and 514 Holmes Street , using the 1984 Curb and Gutter, Sidewalk and Driveway Apron Replacement Program. HRS : cah Attachment i i Memo To: John K. Anderson, City Administrator From: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director Re: Insurance Deductibles Date: April 12, 1984 Introduction Council requested that a policy be established on who pays the $1, 000 deductible under the Public Official's Liability Insurance if there is a law suit. Background The City obtained this policy to provide coverage for the City, the Council and employees who may be named in a lawsuit. The policy covers non-property damage or personal injury type claims. It seems entirely reasonable that since the City is providing the coverage for it's and it's employees' protection, it should also pay the deductible. Why should a Councilmember or an employee have to pay $1,000 out of pocket for what would probably be a good faith performance of his legal duties? The City has picked the figure of $1,000 for a deductible, for a price we could probably get $100 deductible or for more savings, a $10,000 deductible. Would we be looking at the issue in the same light if the deductible were $100 or $10,000? The City Attorney_is also of the J � lie -�izy grioula pay ttie-deductible. Other Cities that were contacted paid the deductible. Alternatives 1. Continue past practice of the City paying the deductible. 2. Adopt policy to make individual liable for the deductible. Recommendation Alternative leo. 1 . Action Requested Action to continue the policy of having the City pay the insurance deductible for Public Officials Libility Insurance. GV:mmr f MEMO TO : John K. Anderson, City Administrator / FROM: Judith S . Cox, City Clerk RE : Application for Gambling License by St. Mark ' s Church DATE : April 12 , 1984 Introduction The City has received an application from St . Mark ' s Church for a Gambling License for July 28 and 29 , 1984. Background St. Mark' s Church is planning a church festival this summer and plans on having games, bingo and a raffle. A bingo license is not required because they are conducting less than five bingo occasions in one year. The applicant is also asking that Council. waive requiring the gambling manager to file a fidelity bond in the sum of $10,000 . A unanimous vote is required . Alternatives a) Approve the gambling license. b ) Deny the gambling license . Pecommended Action 1 ) Approve the application and grant a gambling license to St . Mark' s Catholic Church, 333 West 4th Avenue . 2) Waive the requirement that the gambling manager for St . Mark' s Church festival file a fidelity bond in the sum of $10,000. i JSC/jms MEMO T0 : John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S . Cox, City Clerk 1 RE : Application for A Raffle License by Third Congressional District DFL DATE: April 129 1984 Introduction The City has received an application from the DFL Third Congressional District for a raffle license for May 5 , 1984. Background The DFL Third Congressional District is holding their convention at the Shakopee High School on May 5 , 1984 at which time they wish to have a raffle . The applicant is also asking that Council waive requiring the gambling manager to file a fidelity bond in the sum of $10,000. A unanimous vote is required. Alternatives a) Approve the raffle license . b ) Deny the raffle license. Recommended Action 1 ) Approve the application and grant a raffle license to DFL Third Congressional District at the Shakopee Senior High School on May 5 , 1984. 2) Waive the requirement that the gambling manager for the DFL Third Congressional District raffle file a fidelity bondin i the sum of $10, 000. JSC/jms i Y Y Y Y Y U U u u U W < • ♦ • ♦ • 0 N • • • • • � N f 4 = 1 J a m �J c 1 4 � P .O •O �C O O .- U N CD MMMMM N J J J J J • J J 10 10 ,0 10 .0 z N V1 10 N NfV NNN JN r- N. N OON N r-ti 00 r• r - ►+ r-r• M J J r-M M M M M M J J`O P. O, r O N V1r•r- .- r- r- r r 00•-.- .- .ON J N •-N N r-I F-I 00 M 0p N •- !� •- 1� Z r• r M JJr-MMMMMR r.� J •- •O rr•� MO+ O O O N N N N N N N N N N N O O O U N O O O O O O 0 M M M MMM M M M M M M r r r•r r M M M N N N N NN N N NN NN N M M N N N n N N N N N N U 1 1 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 9 1J rr •-rr •-rrr �- rC)r •- rN •-r' �- Q O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P. O•- O O O C: O O p U 0 :� • • • • • • • • • • 4a 4 4x4444 •4 61 1.1 LI L1 61 IJ LI 1.1 Ll A LI 4Ir K KIY cc d' wK • • WG cz O •a J b •a b•A J •a •a N N ea N V I V) 1/) ea F W W W • • • • • • • • • N y • N 4 u u u a m .►- m �+ �'.+ ►+ zz z zzzzzz » � z a Q N N H N H 1•-I H H H 00 z U (Y K w Q Q Q R a d a Q Q — �f N W W ul N N x Z N S: N f i Z S Y t ea .a 0 Q Z na u7.n N N V) N W N N N W W W W 1.1 = lJ W W W W W • • • —1J44 J4 JQ p. 4x44 1.11J J • A J JJJ JJ J 7- ILL LL LL 4 4 •"•-+4 "4 ... ..H •-+v •-. > > cl G.^" •-' 4 4 4 4 4 4 W OO O 2r.7 Oti 0407» » ad n r10 Q 2444 d 0_ 1- cc cr tl' 07C 0OOOOOOOOO cl� cr O J0 2 Oa » 0 7 .ti 4a 4 NNW W N W(1) 1.11.1 W LI 1.)W 1- H cn CDW I NNNN0 N 0_ t.J H N .• a s • c� ►.►+ v YYrYrrrrrrrrr I.J > > 2 J J J J-J J J J-1 -j J J J c o .. 4 4 4 4 4 x 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 u u 0 W W 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 x 4 z z z z J u r s 2 N N N N N N N N N N N N N C7 \\ (A a IY F H cr r[ Z W W U JJ-/J J J JJ J J J JJ W W W Z lJ L1 C) I.I. 4. aadaatt .11: -K .9i .9i Q� Lr (7) 00 0 G Q 1- K K tr_ 0_ N er cr N N fY N K K n 0 7 U U Z • Z U NN t/I N1•-i" F-FF-F"- 1-F•-HHRH z 2 d \\ d 2- 1z Gz m O I.) z z z z z z z z z z z z z d 4 mm z 7 z z z z J J 4 W W W W W W W W W W W W W • U U • r+ ►•►. M N '� 1.1 Q 4 uuu Uuuuuuuuuu LJ W L_ 41 W Y 3 7 S T 17 ? w K N z z 2 S t i • • + �-+ W W 2 00C.O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 z z J \\ z 0 0 0 0 0 N z a l'- f.- 1-r l'- 10-1-1- Q 4 a� N(/) m fl' 2a: w 2 0- La W O /n GO O L,UUUU 0.` 0 0 d d �[ 4 a d d 4 a d Q d d Q 7 7 L I Q Q '� •i d d d 4 d i1 1 P. C_ N)V+ MM 000 t!'.fn Pll��OMOOOOOP PJ 00M NCO OG J J In V� O P P 1,- O c) f")C) 60 MPIn OC C7 f] Or70'� c7^ Cr• O.O `O n" r- P NN 0. In �J or o NN JJ 00 o NM OC OC 00 CID C( 7 rN00rN NP N 0L NN M nO MM NN O G M M J '0 M N) N)N) N)b 00 N P. M J 1010 ,p .0 N("i r O� M\ 00 O N N 2 D C) S a LI Gl 0Ch ob 00 00 00 w 00 00 M M, 00 or 00 0r M Kf 9C w M or, or w or or 0(•. or oo oc., Y r-r- r- r- r- r r- r- •- r r- •- d •--r• r- r-r• r- r• r- r- r•r- r•r• •- r- = W \ �... \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\ \ \ \ V) H J J J J 1 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J d 00 Or)00000017 JCS >O 'J 7 7 '70 0 '7 Jc7 "7n D LL O O Y C 1 z u Y J O 10 a O 10 10 •O 4 4 O P. P. • P h 6A V1 M L, 0000 « b « NN ^,Nn Nr\jmj N C'' NN • N « r, r- M a JJ J JJ J ., L; r- r- • o 00 « 0 « oo • 0000c-) 00 T MM • N • N N N N N N NN N N N N N N N • N « N N N • N N N N N N P U MM • O « OOOOOOOOCOt7 C)O C) _n « O « 00 O • C)OOO C1 O r OO • r • •- r•-rrrrr•- r rrr rr • r • rr •- ♦ rr •- rr r- U ry N N 32 U L) U U < N t t a 1 1 1 4 W t Z • + a + . + J It CID 1 i a J cI st L N —N M V\A 00 .-. rM .-^ NN _ M M J M J N r N A M O• `� wwwwwNww ww 1 •1 ^ rr wN N a•N M in pp— •" r ^ 1 1 M J Z J wwwwwwNt vMj �•P„ NN N J — J — M r N A M N aC' w w w w r w w w w r 1 ! 1 r r w N J N N N N N N N N N N N r— 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 O N M M M M M M M M M M N N O O O O O O 1 O J M P O M M M11 r M U I J.tJJJJJJJJ JJ "n ^" MMM M ... ^/ OO C;G L. U JV OCA p '- 1 7 a n r- N cc a+ N rn W W IJ W IL e^ S n_ J 0] U u U U �.��.r ►. N U n. C-1 W W 61 61 W W W tJ i.l IJ LI N 7 ? J. �+ W O ZZz22 <2' Z2z WLl u. rY YtY m od W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C p N eO = m O W W IJ W N 4 tJ SZSS22 SSSS 22 .r V1 NNN F 0 tr aaan. aaaaaa -+ ,a �+ W U W J W IJ W W W W tJ.J W tai "'1 IJ • • • • f-. ~ O WIJW W WL/ IJW W W Li wJJ Q a rn r, 2 tY N ~ Q Li m (L R 2J 2 LI 0 D H N N C7 W C N Ic U L U !- W 'r cY 2 1 2 2 2 U C) UUUU d W b O 7 »> d v \ O C) W w w W _ m t7 m m r,� d 2 U zb C7 • • • • m O Q N t (T UO m eE ed og nb M a6 a0 cd ►- H 41 v W W 1.1 41 G ~ 2 2 S F i-- F t_ a!1 •O cr �, Z Z' 2 z W ac Baa aa .c .ra oz a � u W 2 .a...�...�. ra.-. rt .Y Lj 0.m r. OODU m m 0] O U + + + + + O O + + y N N N W M O O O N p pO W% 0 0 n A Vt to U' h V\ M M VN rr ^ .LC in : V% O10* M w O Ci O Q V• N •" r' MM00 MMJ VtMO �J on • • • ir• '• � • • 4 b ['lq :N •, N— I'�t r\! r r V A r J J 10 � a 0 C 00 N C, • • • • • • z •' n, JJ P —NMA 00 !� � � � J 0 ' —r — • M O 2 00 00 `1 10 IC LI 41 J J J J J J J J J J 1 n ao x txl ee ao x x op oo,o `. J Ot, On ac Or r r r r w r \OL � Q \ \ \ \ \ —w w w w w w w— Q O 000000007 J C)C:) � `� •t J J J \ \ t u 1- z u 5. + vt 10 10 ,o .0 0 ,c ,o 10 0 ,o u + d J J J V .1 J J It J J 13, LI J J + N y 70 + N N N N a J r C oo S • N 0 0 0 171 0 0 0 p 0 0 to + I • A A \ A y A y \ O . A NNNNNNNNNN 00 + h • 't000 a + 10 f U r O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N + N • N n a O rrrr rr a � r r • — prr + to ♦ r � ` N a •- y O a r V G, Y Y Y Y U U U U Y Y Y W 1 1 t 1 U <, u U CD 91 « W a « « « , • -d V) • a w .t at 00 t _ ro O a f• N •- `0 s 7 Z N N .O �O`0 00•-IV NNIV N �N N —J J.0 �o .O J M M J M 11 1 1 1 1 1 • r r r-r..-.-N'0 10 M r r O N N �O 'O `0 a0.-N N N N N N N Z M M J .t .. •" rJ J`0 �0�0 J MM .T M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N O O O N O O 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O N r M N••• Vr 0 M N N N M M M f N N N N N M M N N C'! J J JJ JJ J JJJJJJ J J J J d U r•- r ti r: p UO p00 <�UOcJOO O OO .- a 1.1 z O • M •r Vf V) V) N W W W W a a U U U U F f+' e8 () Q' Q! LI W Xcr Q LI) t3 N N V1 W W LL N (n w V) V) N M w W N Z W 2 W W W N N W W W W 1.1 W LL Cl) VI W 0 D H H — H H t-1 F- J JJ • • 7 JJJ JJJ cY • -i CL = 7 a Mn. LL LL " as a n. a CL v 1:1: d i a n. a OnJ n a0_ CL a n. N Off n 7 0 00 x a: f-. 00 0000 U d' w Cl .-. n. N Oto n. M L& NN In NN Vf x 0_ n. W D: Li F fn N Y Id LL n. Q • • 0' SK Q Y V, U U L! W W 0 U C^ z z J J J • • • • • • Z u, VI W •d ��.+ J J J W W W w W W L1 4! T •-e p00 33332 3 N 00 J > U 1-- L1 • . UUU 000000 N M n Q >— n 2 w Cl R. S Z T S S T W K cr "I U �, r-+ r.r-, • • • K 0 0 LL n n� L., 00 Q44 WIn NNNN O IJ Q Z 2 OQ 0 L CD 00 Le • 22 n. M L1 Y W W 0 0 N z z z Z z z LL. Q < O fv 7 )- Y ►+w ►+ z z z z z Z 4 0- d JJJ z z z 7 z z cr VIN ]� J O co 0 n > n >> 0 Q a 4 Z J U U U U L)Li 0 0 0 0 W W41 W W 00 C)L) LAN •00`o MOOM r J .t vf1000-t In to J PM NN JJ I� C•7 J1 IPC OC 01 .n r 0C+ ::C M M C:J C O` • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • J N N N N r J 0 r O N ti r A O J J V% 1010 J r"C NL� WIN V'I P. NN 0-Ol In.OP Vf MJ N J r-00 00 N N CSP MM H M N M N N N N Z • 0 r r C7 S a W L1 J v v3 1 TJJJ 0. w ao of,o0 a a a or x or 00 00 cc 00 W- oc z Ix O = t J \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ L7 ►- J -.t J 3 J ' J J ! J J J J J J J J o o C- ---I mon 0 o > > � n 0 r U Y # I!1 • NN i ,p ,p .O # OC' 0000 # J • \ • • J i U # O. # O co i 0 0 0 « M N'�!+1 M P' 1+1 # M e s a i V+ u` + .7 W # O • r — • r .- r « r- r- •-r r- r r r . i i r a p `r « N « N N N # N N f V « N NNNN N # N # N N i N • N P U 0 O # O 0 0 • C 0 0 « O C O O O O • C # n C • O • -! • r # r r- r # r •-r « CD r r r.- t- • r # f r i r w r U U Y Y N N N U U U W a « • 1 1 1 U' N . + � a a • . a W + il J 7t oC • r O i a J c a M • cc H r •' r OOrNNNN N rNN NA rr r AA M r••M M.1 'pAN'Orr NN N M 'OPI) rrMJ rJJOGO • �" J J J rrr rrr rNr •,.A J r 'V O O r NNNN 1O NQ NN M •- Z A!� I+rj rrMMJ `OA N rNN NA rr N 1 1 1 J M 'OM rrMJ rV\ tn dQ d z N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 zr M M A A A A A A i, � O O N N N N N 0 0 0 O H O O N N M M In MMIMM M rrM (+1M M N1r M P O J J J J J J J J J J N N N N N N N M M M N N N M Ur l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J U •� r r r r r r _ q A \ O O O O c O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O N VA 0 0 0 Q a a aaaa LI LI L1 LI I.I W • WW WLI 61 IJ Ir xat orK Ll Z F- C7 U' (.7 C7 C7 U' U' Ll O M H q O'7mm(n cQ x m ea ea ea ea ea ax �-• � xd F • �� K (x IX Q o: a. xen N N ad IL • • • • • 1 Z [1. F- 11 g 4 q Q q 'Q 4 F- W J W r-I Z U' U' O' CD LO C7 U' Z ZZZ .Z UUU • Q (Y N \ \ \ \ \ \ , U U Q NN V)N NN (n �� s -c q a-t m o- cr N �) L WwW W W W W C'l N NS = ]- X: X LIW W (NNq W 1�1 HHHHM HH I..1 W IJ NN N W W = N O • J F- HFF►- H 1-- = a d ? JJJJJ JJ J JJIay Ha d2 • • • JJ • Q 2 as rHH WW W 0. o— O 1- M a ►- ►-HI- ►.t- 1-- D j j=p OC CO K� j jnj U » 70070 �) NN1.1 LI L: 101.J (1a CL NNx N CC 1.1 f— N H L1 _IJ UUUUUUU YYY cL 2z . • �y cr oo .Lr.:Hzz :.lz• -a �a�¢ zzz zzz x Z Z .4 �i Q 4 2 2 —" n-/ P- u U z z z Z z 2 Z N C`0 0 0 q q q u LI LI tJ n 00000 O W • • • Z .. W W W g q 4 q \\ \ ~ ~ ~ (Y LC K H H H _ O t7 O N N N rn1.1'J W et .1 q O ww W Ll NNN N Id Li W Q -I-� J iZZ2T_ 2Z N (p Niq z z z z ii = aaa w 4 g Q q q q q 7 Z z L I W W L I \\ \ 000 1.1 3K x NC1N NNN N Y A nO 2722 (nN (n d. 2. f[ X J >C iL SSSS 0 L!W K S r J- .a K X w LI W LI W -2 q q r» ru- 1- q J J g ea .a.a an .a M ea (LLL. W C) LDLD (DQ U' C7 ix S Y Yl[ Y (YKIY a v W Y Y Y J J J J . « `OMD' 00 00000000 00 M P J 10 r_, 00 C7 1n �Or JJ Cl r7 C:C ( CONN V:I\ In .T �_ � POCP PNOC P O -7 :N C] 1/1 W,Cl C-,VN JA N J .OAJNN NIc N V% M `O P 4 � 1ON O OrPP P O OG NIn r4 P N r Or J N O V\ Z O r r i a L' LiJJ J JJ �TJJJJ J 4 00 tC 00 M x w X w OC x. �, J 00 J J oC m J J J J J J J J J �T J a, OWN xaox aC oc ae Ip a rr r •.- r r r �r r _ _ rr r rr rrr r S W \\ \ \ \\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ r r r r r r r N 1" JJ J �? JJJJJJ J .t .1 .1 JJJJ JJJ JJ �t J Q 70 O 7 7 C.107 ') '7 -� -� 7 -� 7 ..] '� :7 O Cl W O O > O F- Z H U Y Nh M « r � rr� r- r « d « �1Jd . a 000 30 a 0 U \ A 1\ ♦ a0 70 70 oC U v 'U « P « O \ A A 4 10 - J L 1r r r • r r r r e- r M r « N P N • N h N N a N N N « N N N 0 0 S N N N « N N N N ry N N « N « NN N a N N N N . N N N . N N N « I V Pu 00 C) • 0000000 « C) . O Cl0 « C7000 « 00 C.l' • n00 • O r rr r • rrrr-rr r a r a r re- a •- r rr a rr •. a rrr « r C N U Y Y Y y V, N W i U U U V Y Y W < • 9 U U' U} • • • • • t 1 11 • a at r- o I a a G sc W U O MJV O aOr- NNN Q • 1 1 t / P I M u e-M M J.O .x 't O0 N J� aJ M O 1''lJ In P In 11 NN 30 r. 1 / 1 1 1 1 O r•-MMJ 'O J O O O N WN V1NM N00000 O 1 t t i 1 1 O 0 0' MMMMM cl P ry J J J J �} J M M M M M !n N N N I V N U a J J J J J J N M 1 1 1 1 1 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1 a U � •-^o-M •- e- •t CIO O O O .- o uo •.) •- 0 Q U C O O U t 7 O U 0 0 U •' O • • o N (n00 V) d � n- Z 0 N Q Q Q Q d e 2 00. O W • • • • • O 0 0 0 0 h J Z C) (�1 n' aaaaa u z to a Q Q < a 10 h h v ee ed .a w .0 W 22222 N C0cD c900 = 2 In v)v) N vi W O z z z z z 0 Q IJ IJ W W W etf N(n l = Q W O •�►+..rwH U rr►+Fr erw S 2 JJd CLT a t..I C' C K K p I.J '� ev LL O O J J a' as n. aa p h ► 1- � 1' 0700 G^ 41 7 0 0 0 0 In N W I'l Q' ul h N C9 41 fY • N U 1N LL W 7t 3 Z U C, T c = CJ 1" h 1''- b-. /- ,• IL t, O .n to V) N N W a u O Z zz L2z W UUUUU a m a It cy ►r c r►�►r& Z N lA N N N K tr ')C tr. p Z O tZK1Y � � S QQQQ t_) J W InQQQQ M a a a a d m In 0 0 0 L^ a a a a rn J J = • 1.1 1.1 1.1 W 1.1 .1 c J a YYYY ][ In zZ2Z2Z "1 rr NKK �) IJ U �Z z z 2 O O O O O G� HH ►rHN Q H 77 ? Z: > f- hhh 9 2 J JJJJJ S C' OOCO Q _ _ = S i i J S S S S S 3 7 • • • • • a O Inw w a f7 \ ^ O to W O\ p :J O M f' • M•M • • M fl- N•J• O•o-ti �O•U:+-C• PnP J \C\ x PP 0N10N10 �C 10.o C)I-) lr -\ a•ti C• • m�N Nr 'X.rP \ Nh JM M J LIN 0' O v\ CCN\ LIN O r\ MM a r-'.. MT O. ` p. N un v% M 7 • i n 4 4' a" W CC Q X •C J J J J a J J J a J a cc x x a' x ap eo J J a c \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ x ac ac or co ,c CIO .- •- r •- NJ J J J J a \ \ \ \ \ \ W U O C�'�O 'O U J >O OnC) r JJJJ a a 0 r- N a M M M M M w O a N • tiNI� a O • SOLOO w u1 r U i C7 ♦ 0OQ00 a W t M • MMMMM • M ♦ M • M M M M M • J ♦ J J J J ♦ y1 w YJ ac xa N • N N N N N ♦ Nt • M • M M M M • M Pu a O t O 1n 0 0 0 ♦ N • N N N N N ♦ ry • N N N N • N a N cl IN 00000 • � N V) O ) 1 1 U U U U U W Q • • • 1 1 1 1 1 4 a « • h a « a • � a • a i d lil • • • J 7t 110 I • r O 1 n. J D � • 2 NMS\ w IN W) NNP '•+ r r r r r M M M J J J r v N r N N N r N N N M M r J • r•• rrNrrrrrrr 1 r 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 M O N M I/ f a 0 r N r N N P a N N O r r r r r O 2 r r r r r M M M d d d r a d r N N N r N �� N 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / P M.f •� M M M r a 1"' rrrrrrrrrrrr N O ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 N N N N N N N N N N N N P , t\ N N O O N (%i O N D M M M M M M M M r M M N N M M M M M M M N ^n N N N N N N M N O JJJJJdd JJJJJ a U I l l l l l l i l l l l i U Q Q O O O O U coo a o LI LI W 4 a d w Cc z � • a ¢ a, rr o x 1- � � as•a ea oa • .a a w lJ D ~ J U h h d h zz U Iil W W W W W Ll IJ 41 lil W W Q o af n Z �ZZ "Z z .� zZzz 2 a s IJ000000000000 W Ll = 0 �- = C t V) W il z aan. aan. e. aaan. a o_ � n. o_ J Jan. ►- a = W W W I J W W W I J W W W W •- J �. �H d a H H 2 .w =O a IJ W IJ W W-W W W W0 p 1.- � p p CL C tr H H 1- F-h h ►- H h M- h F W J 4 W W N V)ul I J 0- L I - LJ h N N CU U 5 W a z LL LL LL w ".. LL LL LL a W o m M ... W W W w = w U 7 O J N V) 0 h Ix � 11 N O O Y Y Y Y O • aC K Q 0 UL) U U Ll L! JJJJ JJJJJJJJ tr C UL) J d D LI W W W W W W W LI W W W 1 U \ \ h h h h h C G�O] m 0Ca 0) md0] m N N dd z 1- F- 4- /- Y mm 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 V) W K ft 4, u 0 0 U = zzzztzzZezZZ C t p, IL n. a !q NV) N V) • • w • • a i • cc r 00 a0 NN of cc 000 Pao NN 1,)- Olaf- 00 0000 rr d rC OOA MJ rN1 N V+ 000 MM M M MM 7IX d" On v+ a n In OC- COMP 0N` 0P P rPP M t, ti • . • • . P dd Vi V1 M M rrAO PP p. �OJrMJJ 'O V'%V% rC, NN r 1010 0N N M N IXi.pNO •.. z r rJif `n �O r6N O r • O r' Z 4 LJ W d d J J J d d J J J d J za a a J a a 0. a0 ec a0 00 aC x oo ap o0 a0 ao W a a a a aC 00 a w oc of 00 C7 \ \ \^ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ a \ Z W \\\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ O V) h .fJJJJJJ.1JJJd a J a Jd J as 1 a a d 00000000007 C'1 O O .� 7 ' O LL O O Y C' h 2 r U Y \ AAI� I� Al� 1A AI N. ♦ P • N ♦ L• ♦ a0 a0 • .- ♦ l,Aof « N L) a000aoxaoaoao oroao �000 « n • a « a • d a i a PPP . a 1 W MMMM MMMM N' MMM • M • M i d ♦ a J « d • J J a • LA OD L) N N N N N N N N N N N N i N a NNN i N P U 0000^J 0000000 i Cl i '7 « a ♦ C+O i O • 7c"f O ♦ h • o r ..rrrrrre- rrrr a r • r a r • r- r i r « rrr i r • .-- C` VI N V) V) Y Y Y Y Y U U U U U W < y y � � • L0 L) r a y a a N * • a W v � 1 r O J 0 O 0C N > N z N Nit NN NN �UO OU o000NMMNM � r-• �O �► .f�O.t .C: .[s r J .t .t J\ 1 O O �`� r �-r M J J •-•-� M M J • " �0.���0N .-dMP r-.-POO .t �N.t�.- M •-•�M •.•- � N N M M M N N N 0 0 00 00 00•-N N N M M N M •- Z �O Ir It 10-t 1010 •-NN N .tA NOO r N COON O N O O O O O O P O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z M w-w-r-M rM NNN N •-.r- '-M M M M.M MM r rr •- •-- r C N N N N N N N M M M M N M N P P M N N N N N M N N N N N N O .t Jd�t .f J .t .t.t.f J .f J .tJ J J JJ.t J .t J JJJ .t .f V U •- '-^r •-r M H. •-r 00 M M •- •-.-r' •- J Q O 0000 GSC% OOr-•- I70N 00 00 CS 000000 000000 a a ti rr . • • . • t.1 ' c I u a ct VI Id 61 W 1.141 rJJ KOC KKK b aoa as • • • • 2 J J r.. • . . 0] M tr r Ln Ll O O C, e0 •a ea er ea VI O O O O W Z U U I J Ii i a I'- N 1- 1 a Q O U W U • • • !• • U 0.-> K K w 4 0: ra .a.a m M O 1.I I J ]• z z z Z z (x K S x cr w H rti►+�+ tY �.� Z 0 L V) x V) 2 U' C7 (7 CO NWaHr IJ QdQQQ til NNNNNN I W W W WW Z Z Z Z W 0 r 0 0 N = x x x X v I W W W W 1.1 IJ G • — —" . H . 1-1 H H H H H N M H H 1-. .-• a JJ Ja -i CL rrr )- J • r)- • • • • • • • JJJJJJ 2 r" 0. 4. a rti a_ �'"� z z z z a.W • ra rr U- CO f.0 1; C.0 t9 W a. 0_ d a 0. a. 1.1 O a Q n_ O n_ 7 .-...rrH 2 Oa = S M n0On0 O as a. aa. n. �- O 000 a 11C 0= 0' 2 0KQ W W K JJJ JJ K 707 » 0 �.. 61 V) (n V) t.i V) LJ a a a 11 VI Cl U 1Y 2 tl RI a7 1b m m CL V)V) 0 V) In N aZ L H N a- aaaa. W r —.r •.N•-..r oc UUUv »» » Zzzz a. _u oocovov Y t1 2 N •"'� N C.0 0 C: O Co W Ll W 1J W L;, U • • • • W W \\ \ \ O W O W W W W Q) m V)N VIN V) S K 7 7 7 7 x Z 7 3 7 7 In V1 VI 1n V) z Z 2 Z Z C7 V)VI VI N VI N U C 0 0 00 O O W W 61 L I V I 4 Q Q a Q 2 W W W W W W IL x Z t x J J z Z 71 z r+ 1.1 W LI LI 1.1 b1 7 7 z 7 ? O W W W W W W W J J J J Z U U U U U 2 (n to(A V I N V) Z W W WG7 GI IJW 44 •S%x Q Q :3mD 70 = 1. a. as a n as > > > > s 0Nfn V)fl) cr mmmm > 0 O C O O n 0 \\ \ \ IL Y Y Y Y Y ry Y YY YY YY ]C YY Y UUUU U o' 2xK aCK 0 JJJJJJ a Q Q -r a 4 aQ .t Q Q » 7 0 • .r Q Q Q Q m W L, b I L. W W 3. s = x x z z T = a cl a a a ::) :) » > > VI N VI V) N N N N V) 00 V) N N (A 0 cn ) N V) N N VI to Vl to t t a a t • t • NP NQ+ 1-. NM C)fl- .0 f- 1 )vP NCN 001`- 00 .t d .t t .t0 ,O IO 00 .t N00 I� 00 .t ti (,s 0CC J M, C O Imo. V'. V` .O 'o r .0 r N \ N VI .^ p N N J M M r A O O` r- N 1! N N 1 O N Or 1 e- r 1j O 00 Q` C]0 .t 'O a) It NNP M1 OT 00 NN MNN �•- N •�•� F- OO N ON • w • O 00M N N N O •- N �- e- S a W W 1 d .t J1 .t 4 3. d .t .tJd .t J 1 'r 'T -.r „t JJJ 'r .t a 00 00 00 00 w pc or 30 00 w R: 00 0C 0o ar 0o 00 00 00 00 x 00 x or 0r oc 0C 00 00 Y r •- ra- r r � � rrr•-r rr •- •-r r.- .-r Z W \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ VI F J ..t J ,.t J J .t .t .t J J .t .t J .t d .t J J .t d .t J J J .t J J O O 007 aO']OJ Z) 000 -3 O 0 '70000 L. C) O Y C r Z N U Y N M M M M i Nv1 i 30000000 a .VM1 \\ 1, 00 t 00000 i N 10 BO O o d U O 0000 a rl- 0 t 0000 a • NNNNN a N NNNNNN J W N N NN W a VAN t NNN N ♦ N N NN N N a N N NNN a N NN N NNN 00 Z N NNNN • NN a NNNN a NNNNN N • NNNNN a N NNN(NJ NN P U O 0000 t C 0 ♦ 0 n m 0 ♦ OOO C)o O a 00000 t O n0Or7 o0 •- r � �� � a •- r- a r •- r � a r � �� r r • •- r •- �� a r r, n - Y N Y Y N W U U Y N 0 r / U U Y N N N W < • • / ! U Y Y Y 0 (At • • • t U U • Q N • • • • • 1 1 d W t • • • • 1 • • • v a x • • i a J 0 � J > O. o \z ouNti r- CMN 7 ►+ PM •-•-MJJMMJMM J N � r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N M M ^ N 1 M J • •�•• •-•-•-•-•-N.-P r r r 1 1 1 J O r'•' N^ �•-N�M� M N •' •� N 1 1 •- N Pb M •-•-MJJ MMJMMJ ^ ••• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N M M ^ ut N 00000 O N N "•e r �L1 •- C) O O 1 O J J N N N fV NN M M to V% M M NN rd- N O J J J J J J J J J J J M u\ N M J Q 00 0000000:7 Ll C) V a •' r 1 1 1 O C O Q •- .� C.] O a w M N N h a H •N[naaa W ci as H N O G ►. ►a" m + W 2 » »> — l) 41 -i W W W N r -) -- '" N N I NN 0NNS •E 0 1 1 1 , LJ > W WJ WWWWW I'1 'd 1 < cc ra r•►r�... ►+ •J J .1Q a J�" 777770. 41 WhF- 1-• `a `S ,.� Li CL Q 0 > r O J 4. M M M M D o Q < a a < O Q a o LL ., » o 0larrcc < eQ h o o NU NNNNNIJ I-►- UUU R Of c7 O r� � r N LI a L: h [n c^ a a > > M t3 0 W W W W W W W W W W W 61 c Y W W W W W W W W W W W W IJ u aaan. a° aaa (Laa Q ^ .. o LJ I J N N 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t+) r K a ry = N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ~ = h •"" 0_ � U W W F- •"� 4� J h Q Q < 4 4 Q « Q Q Q O V) g tl a Y n" 77 SSSS SSSSS TS . 2 ' • S J O N N h n Z > > N 1' N N u y L1 mm LLLLLLILLLLLLt. LLLLLLLL O In Y O > o00000000c� o � _ n. w U) 0 � W W 7. Y >A. Ir Y O h 1-'f" h 1-F- 1- Z •"' a ix_ as a h NN UU U U aJ UU UU UU U = • `' <t r J d O 0. �O O N N n 0 0 0 In In O •' JJ nIndON a O1� N m 00GO • • d 0 O[ cc v+ v+ N v1 n n O R O° K) •-NEON M .ONJ rO� W • • • • • • • • V O O J J H N M •- N r II- M M n J P a C O O O O O M M • _ •- N W 41 `r r JJ JJ JJ a ' co JJJJJ J J or o0 0o a x� ac a; op or x d J v � 00 00 pp a[+ 00J N Hd J J J J J J J J J J J J J J \ \ \ OOOO 0000 r,. OJ J J J J J J LL L7 7 J > In h 2 U Nn+ • MM MMMMMM MMM • `' • M • \ • N • P J L N N • N N In N N J • d M !• '� • P 4 P • N • N 40 S N N • N N N N • N i V\ i In N • N • N • N N N N N N N N N N N • N • N i f y N • •O • .O U n 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C,0 • N • N • N • N rr t O * O a o� Y N U Y w 1 u CO i W u i Q N i a w s a 00 0 ICL21 Ln 00 7C N 4h ou P P _ •� U N O M M r N M N O T N N N r 2 V1 ,tJ M 1 M .t 1 r .t J v J •� J O J J H O N r O N O N O O O O M r r N O M M to r. O p M P N M M M M N M N M 0 s s a s as s U / J J J J .t 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 e e ! 1 1 1 1 1 t U p a a a 1.1 [Y N fr • I.r r- r o_ •e o m Cl) N oti a r H w a rL w m N v;3 w 1.1 N n K 3 tZy O 7 N .. U 2 7 ►, w Z v t7 O J > u H N V > > N Q. U lx d 1J W 41 a' Q cr m v p N W Z 1 N 1D W 1.1 Z •D O W W A ca Z N W N J W J IL N N 2 N N t.J O • Q • J �. J • O_ N J r K • 2 2 IJ H • J e.l Q 1.1 O 7 a n. a !- O a Q ... !] O a d t.J H tr m d O d O y O 0 n' Q cY O IY C J 1.1 U N U Z CL n. 1.1 H 0_ 4. 'S N H LJ O tr r N Ln Z W r cr J + Z U c7 J W ra a Z. Y N J IL • a. • r• U CKO O O tJ F- F- !- n tY W O S w n > K z W S o' Z d S 7 G a W G O CL 2 c9 W O W W a U W N C+ rr J U Q rY rn 1.t H 2 UI \ O ►. Z W J J O W S W r/1 U 2 Z O ti a-a J Q W U t f m K W U U 0 LJ J 1.1 G O O O O ►- Z ►� Q O >- K O F ? W T Y U • q \ \ H J n K ? �' ►+ O C 1- S i N N J W ►+ S d a' O tr U S' ? 4 J L tY Q; Of :3 J :7 Of L1 Ll O Q O ti a a d 4 p y 2 d k ly U U K U U U 3 7 Z t_) S 1 S r. • i • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • O O O P P O O !`1�- O C: O O r r 0 0 r r O O O O 00 O O �o O O G d J f1 O Cl O G 0 0 01 0C % Q M M 0 0 O O f*- P 0 0 !r 1 fl O .T O O O 00 x N N U O r. O 1 .t U O N N O 10 61 6` J.t 174 %Z 10 O O p 0 OO Vein /p 00 n0 M X0,0 0000 rr. NN .TJ OO F,f, M1+: p M M M M M N N N N G 7 N N N O J J Z d Li .t v J .t J J t 1 4 ,J t a tk: eK 00 00 Y, x: 70 S 00 x 7 70 00 00 x Y r � a :d LL o o 7 n :D o 0 r o r a-+ U Y • G N M J V1 10 0O P U • O O '7 U U O n p O v •- r .,t L. M 10 X7 on 70 00 0O JO 30 10 a0 10 70 10 • 00 70 OC S • N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a N N . r, � n r o n n i ro o II r r r r • r r L; W U y d y tl W Z s a 00 O • c� 7 a ti M s oa p, U — N M '0 V� J ry N 00 p` `O SIC N v M ~ � • � 1 1 r J M M M O ry N M M Ca M ^ r 1 •1 1 1 M `* M M M J ry •" rn ul M ri^j O N N M In^ J OI •'„ ^ 1 1 1 M rO O r 1 1 1 i I J M M M 7 N r N N rA N N P cc M r O d tV 1 / 1 J r.- r n J N M ..i M M O O .p 1 1 I I 1 N v1 M M P rO O O M 7C '-C 00 r�j 1 1 c:D C) 00() d • 1.I 2 • 1.1 a 7 • L. o a 1 rc H • �" ''� • r,t cn ed • cr F H W H y m H cv a U a m m2 O ... ) � U O U m N S y ' = R W ' rn H i 0: U n O• t.l 1.1 y y Z I m od s O Z H J J ad M .yl • N LJ !.1 N y l,l y w O M. Q y y M- "•~-• • W tl J y n 4 W (ny y 0 o a •lq L! Ln y O O w O Q K -r O O T O r.r O. II-II- «. a K Ll U CL f- tv U rY �i1 Q ti 7 Z 7 3. W rl q 7 I,1 W W cn H O W cr > t1 Y ~ U W Z W W q S y z 2 2 U q 2 j cc z .2 rn 0 .n R m q 11 O U W "+ O = q ]C o re qLl J y O C ►'" J J 10 t1 O O O fL y O W I.l �. R, Q' IL 2 O 2 L) 0O Li q O c • w Y U rn y y Q. 0 C" O O m y y = 00 °"' � O C O U U J J41 J • • J NNNy 00 00 00 P J 00 cc • * • • « • • PP MM NN • • 00 NP r NN _•N 00 ^J• O• OO P P .Oj.O-1 00 P Q�O M .-r N • NN OD�; sJ 100 �0 JJ NN ru VN f.-F, 00 0O 00 .p�O • W Ll s .r S s a0 Oc or m ry J J a .► J x or x , oc or00 30 00 00 ac J s s s CC or, w • > > n o p I U H- 2 N U It: 50 P U J LI N N N N v J N ,Q t\ 00 00 S N b 00 mN N N N ry ry N O r ry M J J J ^ U P N N N N N N N 20 30 70 ]0 30 30 10 00 30 x Oc 30 r0 •- ^ ^O r O O O O O O N N N N N N N N ^r r r •- ^ 0 O d U W 1 (� M W 4 M t, N • Q N G W Z a a 00 • i a a O A } Z O H L7 • 0 0 0 • - Z O !- 10 Z M O � p M u / U r Q R Z lL 0 H 00 2 z } h/- O m J Z 2 �+ LL O W L! h } T IL • ►- H S a d w LI i.1 LJ W N N .. W z } a MI.a } » tr. J O O' • O O O O K 0: L) W LL W CL K 0: 0: Z 1- i,- (n N N - aaaD W \ J W D Y i L W J T L] 0 a X LlI- Z cc LI K tr O H 2 D W Y • Q Q Q M W 0_' J L1 LL ZCas 1 ms a •+ N W W < w < 1 0 - 0• W d 6- H w V Q. S U Y 00 OC r N LL 7 0' LI F- N H L7 la: K U Q Q d d d d 4 R d Q •'I d W F H 1- H F- H ►- H' F N ►- �- S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U T F-H ►- F /- F- F-H 1-f. Y-V` r O U er r M In n M n .0 00 p•- r rn p 7 O '- rr N N tl%N 10 PI- 00 OC Z a LI c0000ca00000 J 7 K 7 Z 2 2 Z 2 Z 2 2 2 Z 2 d W >> > >> > >> > > O O L7 LL u U. LL LL W LL W U. LL LL LL O a 1.. Ix • as rr•-N O00 OIndM00O tP CC..OL Mr Nt D• ONOn P'- n n a ; • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • `0 l a4Naa "N � 00 V N N 00 U 0 m r a N M to 10 1-- 1, P O D o- m m N r, V, In Z r N 0 W W d 0. er O � Y r a r = W \ 4 O LL O O T C' H U Y N • U M • a W O0 • O0 = N • •P U O • O .-� N M � V1 1.0 1� 00 .-a •-� .--� rl .-1 .-1 .-4 —4 � .--1 M M M M M M M M M M U V) tr1 Ln Ln Ln ul 1r) tr) ir) Lr) O H O M O O O -4 O M O O 00 y O 00 1f1 (ON O Irl N 00 CC -.'4 I- m O O -1' O 00 Lr) N M -4 �O 00 N ir) M O U •-+ M Ll lj M N U U 7 >a H O U a a � U 3-i `4 N U w 44O R'+ U cd cin H P4 W 1~ O �, NI I O = H � O w Z O H +� w O 41 m >1 D 4-4 cc O r-1 cU - m cz z u .a z b w Q �°� - a x x° m w C)4 P4 ra U U U U D _ O �O c] w w H N U H O 00 00 x O 1J O 1.1 4-1 1.1 41 -W • O O\ O O 44 H Op U co 0 � N N U N Cl) N N W4 04 94 P4 P4 1:4 O 0 M O O O O d O O N H O M O O O -- O m O O r+ ^ 00 0 00 U O� O LA N00 N r� •--� u'1 '� O v1 rn O O d O r, -r Lf) cr1 �0 00 N M N N O M tr1 lO M �1 b G O [J:4 H w -4 H >� R3 '-I �] O U O O O O O O O O O O O O O G �' C) O o 0 0 0 0 o O o O O O ca o a a .-1 -4 r .-4 -4 � --4 .-a -4 1.1 I I O -4 H O 00 U O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 t W 00 cis rL4 o O O O O O O N M Cl) N . 4 O O O O O O -+ M ^i .-1 .� O O O O O O O O MN .4 00 cr1 O O O O O O M F O O o O O O O U ON .-i ^ ^ -a p M O O O O O U D` N M N N N N N .-a r+ ON U -:4 M m ON m ON ON O) M M M M M CO w W 0 p 00 00 00 00 00 00 ,0 0 0 0 p O Z' ON .-� N M 7 rn h 00 0) O M N N N N N N N N N M M M M Cl) Ln M M M M Cl) M M M M M M M M M U Ln tf) Ln Lf) u1 u"t tr) tr) Lr) u•1 rr1 Lr) Ln Ln O O ha\ O Lr) O N O O O O N O O O 00 O --tO H 1 - O O �p � u1 00 Ln O M L h -4 N 00 �+ LO 00 ON h 00 co� O O .7 e0 a1 - m M � O rn Ln U N U to U N H 7 C C C ( U C u o Fr bD v a C a u Q ..1 0 a G o( b co � _S4 c w w = _ m Q) (n = ro u v) Pa 0 +1 -4 ro �4 cn >4 1 4 w cu co cd H O E. 4-1 4-1 caOU z z a w o c°7 u cin w .� u Q a � x to U) a W UI U O w C v - - - a G u �, o o p = - zs �4 x cu H "'H H a w v m 4--1 m U) m w A w A a cn Ls r-i C U '--i 41 41 41 -I = 0 - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ = O 41 O O H 4-j O a4-j 4-1= -I !n O O O rl l O 4 ri rl rl rl v �4 m :� u u u v W ro v u v dm cn a A cn U P' cn cn x x a x x x w' O O O tr) cr) `O h O '- h M � O h - N O O r+ O, O Ln 0 0 if1 N N O �r1 ir1 �t -4 h -t Ln 0 00 00 --1 O 0 O\ N O O N O O O 00 O d H �o rn O h .Z N O h 00 d M m Ln w w � w m --i h M c0 N Irl N O O a1 h oo O O h O 00 h Ur1 N 00 N �t h M .-� N .-� O� �r'1 .--� 0 N N M .-r �t N M �O .- M M 9 - D\ M �O 6 M M Ln �r1 H U O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 6 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O - -a - .- 00 00 00 U - O 000 0 00000000000 O O hh O O 00 00 00 00 N m h M N M 00 N "•+ A NN 00 Ln N N N N N Cl) 1-4 O N N O O O O O O 0 00 - N o "D M 't M --+ M IO \O � -t - N h O O O O O O O O co . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P -- --1 _ r+ � --r -4 -a -+ N r+ N U) 00 h O --a - O O O O O O O O� h 0N O O O O O M N M 00 N -ArN N M Url N N N N O O O 'o M d M M \0 �O .O -t N 0 00 U 00 000 000000000000 O � -� O h h h h ON m •--� --i O� N N M N N Cil N C1 Cl) c1 M M M M M cn M M cn M M M M M r1 M I�7 t h M M a\ IT Q` Q\ � H � d �t �' � � � � � d � � d �t �7 �t �7 7 •.t M �t t moi' �t r� W -+ O 000 000000000000 00 00 00 O O 6 A 0 z M M x u'1 U ^+ O M t` n � x U 00 >4 w � 4-1 O � Q � z ro w � H v ro Ln w bo Y4 i3O \DOOr1 U }4 M r— 00 u1 - �D :3 \D N ON 00 r-�Y U M O H !J I'D N 00 •ri t/} Pa � Ri H O M z X 00 En En W G H H W ::$ 44 1-4 U O Sd -1 41 14 >4 O •rl N � C) cn G � 3 �44-1, c-1dC�) x � Q1 aD U 00 4-1 1 1 1 1 i Stf 0 .4 v1 .-4 --4 M a HO •-+ r, 0000 Sb O Q\ O O ri O rI H O I4 U a(.) rn Q N O� H -zr H Pq w 00 Ca S City of Shakopee POLICE DEPARTMENT 476 South Gorman Street SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 Tel. 445-6666 TO: Mayor, Council. Members FROM: Tom Brownell , Chief of Police SUBJECT: Moratorium/Taxicab Licensing DATE: April 12, 1983 INTRODUCTION Since granting of the Racetrack the city has applications and inquiries from individuals interested in obtaining a license to operate a taxicab company . BACKGROUND Shakopee City Code 6 . 22 regulates the licensing and operation of taxicabs. Upon reviewing the present city code in relation to other cities ordinances a revision is required to better regulate the operator and equipment to insure the safety of passengers. The City Attorney advises that council may suspend licensing based upon the fact that the city code is being modified. ALTERNATIVES 1 . Declare a sixty day moratorium on issuing taxicab licenses and direct staff to redraft city code 6 . 22 to provide improved consumer protection . 2. Continue to regulate taxicab licensing and operation of taxicabs within the scope of the present City Code 6 . 22 . RECOMMENDATION Declare a sixty day moratorium on issuing taxicab licenses and direct staff to redraft City Code 6 . 22 to provide improved consumer protection. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Declare a sixty day moratorium on issuing taxicab licenses and direct staff to redraft City Code 6 . 22 to provide improved consumer protection . .J O G,EIVE �7O f 2ofErt MEMORANDUM TO: John K. Anderson/City Administrator FROM: Steve Hurley/Engineering Technician RE: Apportioning Special Assessments Among Parcels Located North of County Road 16 ( Shakopee Cable Head End Site) DATE: April 13 , 1984 Introduction: There are special assessments against parcels 27-905004-0 and 27-908026-0 which have now been subdivided. The attached Resolution apportions the special assessments equally among the newly created parcels . The property owner has been advised of the proposed apportion- ment . i E Action Requested: Offer Resolution No. 2274, A Resolution Apportioning Assess- ments Among Parcels Located North of County Road 16 ( Shakopee Cable Head End Site ) , parcels numbered 27-905004-0 and 27-908026-0 and move its adoption. SH: cah Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 2247 A RESOLUTION APPORTIONING ASSESSMENTS AMONG PARCELS LOCATED NORTH 01' COUNTY ROAD 16 (SHAKOPEE CABLE HEAD END SITE) WHEREAS , on August 13 , 1974, Resolution No . 786 adopted by the City Council levied assessments against properties benefitted by the construction of the 1972-2 VIP Watermain Project , and WHEREAS , on August 25 , 1981 , Resolution No . 1891 adopted by the City Council levied assessment against properties benefitted by the construction of the 1981-1 Interceptor Sewer Project , and WHEREAS , two tracts of land benefitted by the said improve- ments known as parcel no . 27-905004-0 and parcel no . 27-908026-0 _ have been subdivided , and WHEREAS , it is the desire of the City Council to apportion the installments remaining unpaid against said tract among; the current parcels within the tract , and WHEREAS , the property owners involved have been notified of this proposed action. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE: 1 . That the 1.984 payable current principal , current interest and remaining balance to parcels 27-905004-0 and 27-908026-0 for projects 72-2 and 81-1. is as follows : Parcel # Project Current Principal Current Int . Bal . Remaining 27-905004-0 18( 72-2 ) $187 . 78 $15 . 02 $ 0 . 00 tv 55 ( 81-1 ) 77 . 31 54 . 13 541 . 19 27-908026-0 18 $367 . 13 $29 . 37 $ 0 . 00 it 55 64.40 45 . 08 450 . 75 2 . Those assessments are split as follows : Parcel ## Project Cur . Prin. Cur. Int . Bal . Rem. Name/Address 27-905004-1 18( 72-2 ) $ 55 . 62 $ 4.45 $ 0.00 Shakopee Cable C it 55( 81-1 ) 22 . 90 16 .03 160 . 30 137 E. 1st Ave . Shakopee , MN 27-905004-0 18 $132 . 16 $10. 57 $ 0 . 00 Art & Helene Fon it 55 54.41 38 . 10 380. 89 Jalane Kohl_r. usch Box 251 Shakopee , MN 27-908026-1 18 $ 20. 52 $ 1 . 64 $ 0 .00 Shakopee Cable C it 55 3. 56 2 . 52 25 . 20 137 E. lst Ave . Shakopee , ' [N 27-908026-0 18 $346 . 61 $27 . 73 $ 0 . 00 Art Fonder. & if 55 60 . 84 42 . 56 425 . 55 Jalane Kohlrusch Box 251 Shakopee , MN 3 . That all other parts of Resolution No . 786 shall continue in effect . 4 . That all other parts of Resolution No . 1891 shall_ continue in effect . Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, this 17th day of April , 1984 . Mayor o� tfie Zity o�Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk - -- Approved as to form this day of 1 . City Attorney —� City of Shakopee _ �- E a POLICE DEPARTMENT ��� 4-1 .NNE .• Jl .`1 s r 476 South Gorman Street SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 t C Tel. 445-6666 �n T.A'1t'.>l.f►n.Z�. TO: Mayor, Council Members FROM: Tom Brownell , Chief of Police SUBJECT: Unclaimed/Surplus Property Auction DATE: April 12, 1984 INTRODUCTION - City Code 2. 70 authorizes the disposal of unclaimed/surplus property. The Police Department accumulates stolen property which remains unclaimed due to a lack of owner identification and requires a public sale for disposal . The City also has items which are no longer servicable nor of use to other city departments through transfer. All proceeds less costs are credited to the general fund. BACKGROUND On May 19, 1984 , the City of Shakopee and Scott County will conduct a joint public auction . Upon adoption of a resolution, a description of the unclaimed property will be published as public notice in an effort to return property to the legal owner prior to the sale . COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Pass resolution . JD .(JEI(VE go pwtEQE 1 � RESOLUTION NO. 224 , A Resolution Authorizing the Disposal of Unclaimed Property WHEREAS, the Shakopee Police Department of the City of Shakopee has had property in its possession for more than sixty (60) days, which property remains unclaimed by the owner; and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee desires to dispose of said property and additional items declared surplus property . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, hereby declares the attached list of Unclaimed Property, dated April 17 . 1_984 described certain property abandoned property and that the appropriate City officials are hereby authorized and directed to dispose of said property pursuant to Section 2. 70, Subdivision 2, of the Shakopee City Code. Adopted in session of of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this _ day of 1984 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of 1 1984 . April 17 , 1984 RECOVERED BICYCLES (1) Huffy Pro, frame only, Ser #20849 (2 ) Columbia, Blue, 26", Ser #P138620 (3) Schwinn Varsity, Maroon, Ser #BP51284:3 (4) Sears, 26" , Boys, Black (5) Schwinn Traveler, 26" , Red, Ser #L523256 (6 ) Sears, 26", Girls, Green, Ser #NO9381.06 (7 ) AMF Jr. Roa.dmaster, Orange , No # (8 ) All Pro, 26", Red Frame, Ser #M00647612 (J) Murray, 20" , Red, Ser #MO900562OT9246026 (10) Iverson, 26" , Black No Ser # (1.1) Black, Huffy, 20" , Ser #6854 (12 ) Murray, 26" , Boys, Silver, Ser #9735265 ( 1.3 ) Huffy BMA, Boys, Blue, 26" , Ser #R735340694 (14 ) Huffy Pro Thunder, Silver, 20" , Ser #C80981 (15) Huffy Sun Country, 2.6 : , Boys, Ser #HC1.267361 ( 16) Blue, 26" , 10-Speed, No Ser # (17 ) Red Cimarron, 26" , Boys, Ser #HC8026904 (18 ) Huffy Santa Fa, Frame only, Ser #IIA933898 (19) Sears, Free Spirit , Ser #P3304157 (20 ) Boys, Black, 26", 10-speed , No Ser # (21) Columbia Form "10" , Girls, 26" , Ser #16830, Two-Tone Blue (22) BMA, 26" , Blue, Boys, Ser #HP0772517 (23 ) Tease, 26" , Yellow, Boys, (24 ) Pro Thunder, 20" , Yellow, Boys, Ser #HA36310 (25) Blue, 18" , girls (26) Schwinn, Silver, 20" , Boys (ff)�XNXx)=%XA 6 (28 ) Red, 20" , Boys (29) Sears, Green , 24" , boys (30) Black, frame only, 26" , boys (31) One Underwood adding machine purchased prior to 1975 - Property #0178 (32) Olivetti Electric typewriter - property number #0096 (33) One Wood Desk (34) One Metal Desk (35 ) Four Posting Trays ( 36) Two Calculators /cc MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Admin. FROM: Judith S . Cox, City Clerk RE: Request for Vacation of Part of Shumway Between First and Second Avenues . DATE : April 6 , 1984 INTRODUCTION: The City has received a request for the vacation of part of Shumway Street between 1st and 2nd Avenues . BACKGROUND: C .H. Carpenter Lumber Company, Inc . owns property on both sides of Shumway just South of 1st Avenue and is requesting vacation of approximately 86 feet of Shumway. Since Shumway is not an open street from 2nd to 1st , I thought it might be worthwhile to vacate the whole street from 1st to 2nd . Since the ownership of property in this area is very confusing be- cause of the railroads , Mr. Coller advised that consideration be made just of the original request . Therefore , the attached resolution sets a date to consider only the vacation of that part of Shumway, immediately South of I_st Avenue , as requested by Lhe abutting property owner . ALTERNATIVES : 1 ) Adopt Resolution No. 2241 , setting the date for a public hearing. 21 Deny request for vacation. 3 ) Table request for vacation for further information. ACTION RECOMMENDED: Offer Resolution No. 2241 , initiating the Vacation of Part of Shumway Street Between First and Second Avenues , According to the Plat of Shakopee City, Scott County, Minnesota and move its .adoption. JSC/bn /6 cj RESOLUTION N0. 2241 A RESOLUTION INITIATING THE VACATION OF PART OF SHUMWAY STREET BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND AVENUES ; ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SHAKOPEE CITY; SCOTT COUNTY; MINNESOTA WHEREAS ; A PETITION has been received by abutting property owners requesting the vacation of that part of Shumway Street as shown on the recorded plat of the City of Shakopee , Scott County, State of Minnesota , legally described as follows to wit : Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of Block 17 of said plat ; thence Southerly along the Easterly line of Block 17 a distance of 76 . 00 feet ; then Easterly to a point on the Westerly line of Block 18 of said plat to a point 86 . 91 feet Southerly of the Northwesterly corner of said Block 18 ; thence Northerly along said Westerly line of Block 18 , a distance of 86 . 91 feet to the Northwesterly corner of said Block 18; thence Westerly a distance of 80. 00 feet to the point of beginning. WHEREAS ; It has been made to appear to the Shakopee City Council that the said street serves no public use or interest ; and WHEREAS ; A public hearing must be had before such action can be taken and two weeks published and posted notice thereof must be given. NOW; THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE; MINNESOTA; That a hearing be held in the Council Chambers on the 15th day of May, 1984 at 7 : 30 p.m. , or thereafter, on the matter of vacating that part of Shumway Street as shown on the recorded plat of the City of Shakopee , Scott County, State of Minnesota , legally described as follows to wit : Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of Block 17 of said plat ; thence Southerly along the Easterly line of Block 17 a distance of 76 . 00 feet ; then Easterly to a point on the Westerly line of Block j 18 of said plat to a point 86 . 91 feet Southerly of the Northwesterly corner of said Block 18 ; thence Northerly along said Westerly line of Block 18 , a distance of 86 . 91 feet to the Northwesterly corner of said Block 18; thence Westerly a distance of 80. 00 feet to the point of beginning. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED; That two weeks ' published notice be given by publication in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS AND posted notice be given by two weeks ' posting a copy of such notice on the Bulletin Board in the main floor of the Scott County Court House , on the Bulletin Board in the Shakopee City Hall and on the Bulletin Board in the Shakopee Public Utilitie ' s Building. Adopted in adjourned regular session of the Shakopee City Council held this 17th day of April , 1984. j MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Admin. FROM: Judith S . Cox, City Clerk`- ,,r-- RE: Request for Vacation of An Alley South of 10th Avenue Between Apgar and Shumway . DATE : April 9 , 1984 INTRODUCTION: The City has received the attached request to vacate the alley South of 10th Avenue between Apgar and Shumway. BACKGROUND: The petition has been signed by all abutting property owners . If Council wishes to consider the request , a public hearing should be set at which time the request would be considered. ALTERNATIVES : a] Set public hearing date . b] Deny request . c ] Table for additional information. ACTION RECOMMENDED: Offer Resolution No. 2242 , A Resolution Initiating the Vacation of the Public Alley in Block 1 , According to the Plat of Terrence Addition to the City of Shakopee , Scott County, Minnesota and move its adoption. RESOLUTION NO. 2242 A RESOLUTION INITIATING THE VACATION OF THE PUBLIC ALLEY IN BLOCK 1 , ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF TERRENCE ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. WHEREAS , A PETITION has been received by abutting property owners , requesting the vacation of the alley in Block 1 , Terrence Addition; and WHEREAS , It has been made to appear to the Shakopee City Council that the said alley serves no public use or interest ; and WHEREAS , A public hearing must be had before such action can be taken and two weeks published and posted notice thereof must be given. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, That a hearing be held in the Council Chambers on the 15th day of May, 1984 at 7 :40 p .m. , or thereafter, on the matter of vacating the public alley in Block 1 , Terrence Addition to the City of Shakopee , according to the plat thereof . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That two weeks ' published notice be given by publication in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and posted notice be given by two weeks posting a copy of such notice on the Bulletin Board in the main floor of the Scott County Court House , on the Bulletin Board in the Shakopee City Hall and on the Bulletin Board in the Shakopee Public Utilitie ' s Building. Adopted in adjourned regular session of the Shakopee City Council held this 17th day of April , 1984. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk A. rirri.rr� nc } arm tl,i n Stl� anis ,-.-C COUNCIL WORKSESSION GOALS & OBJECTIVES 1984 Approved April 4 , 1984 Communications 1 .0 GOAL - It shall be the goal of the City of Shakopee to foster . ._ effective , two-way communications between the City Council Members , City employees , citizens , other governmental agencies and interest groups . 1 . 1IBGOAL - The betterment of public relations and improvement of existing communications with the general public , news media and groups using City services . 1 . 11 Objective - Encourage department heads to get out press releases on positive , more routine items to improve public knowledge of City operations . Ac_ tion - On going . Systematically review services- / issues that lend themselves to publication , etc . Make a seasonal listing of notices for utility stuffers and news media by 8/ 1/84 . 1 . 12 Objective - How can the City get more and better citizens participation in City affairs? What is the City ' s responsibility in disseminating information , generating press or radio coverage? Action, - Staff should maximize all publication and notice procedures to inform the public . 1 . 13 Objective - Prepare for possible Cable TV broadcasts of Council meetings and other events . AcctjQn - Cable Advisory Committee formed and making plans for non-profit cable corporation which will do local origination programing. Inc . papers filed 2/84 & orientation held 3/84 , begin Council broadcast by 9/ 1/85 - 1 . 14 Objective - Improvenewspapercoverageof all Council meetings to get broader citizen/Council perspective on meeting discussion and action . c ion - Remind newspaper to attend all meetings to minimize staff time with media on follow-up the day after . 1 . 1 5 Ob jgctive - Create a good concise annual report that lists activities in a statistical manner and narrative manner for each department . Action - Provide first Draft by 1/31/85 for 1984 . 1 . 16 Objective - Staff members should not give citizens the impression they can resolve a problem in/with another staff person ' s department . -1- Action - Staff should follow Council Policy of dealing with complaints i .e. take complaint and suggest you ' ll look into it with the concerned department (be non-commital rather offering support or opposition until all sides of the issue are aired) . 1 .2 SUBGOAL - The City Administrator should undertake steps to resolve personnel problems in a timely manner and improve employee morale. 1 .21 Obj iv - Council would like more feedback on potential problem areas . Action - Keep Council posted through informational items . 1 .22 Objective - Investigate incentive programs designed to encourage City employees to look for money and time-saving ways to run city operations . Action - Prepare a report on possible alternatives by May 1 , 1984. 1 .23 Objective - Consider additional Administrative Staff support for transit system as it is being set up. Action - Report by 5/ 1/84. 1 . 24 ObJective - Consider staffing to get into municipal cable programming towards the end of 1984 (using increased cable revenues) . Action - Report by 5/ 1/84. 1 .25 Objective - Carefully plan the extra work load on Staff if we get the Racetrack and hope to carry on other business during the push to complete construction. Action - Conduct staff meeting to address this problem the 1st week of April if the Shakopee site is selected . Government Structure 2 .0 GOAL - Continually strive for effective and efficient municipal government . 2 . 1 SUB-GOAL - Recommend the establishment and improvement of programs and department function to insure a smooth running , efficient and more effective municipal government. 2 . 11 Objective - City Administrator should make more decisions without Council approval when covered by resolution , standard procedure , ordinances . Action - Council and staff should identify and assign more areas of routine oversite to the Administrator . -2- 2 . 12 Objective - Survey City services to determine if they are all being used to the optimum. Action - On going . Systematically question services to determine if they are being used or if they are being provided at the proper level . Do this through quarterly department head meetings and budget cycle . Establish objective measurement devices for services provided by each department . Action - Develop a list of all City services for Council staff review by October 1 , 1984. 2. 13 Objective - Insure that all operations can be properly staffed during regular hours . Action - Cross-train employees in related areas to carry on in case of short term vacancies , sickness and vacations . Example : Building Permits , Zoning , Word Processing , Inspections , etc . 2 . 14 Ob.jectivg - Develop microfilming and document control procedures and purge files . Action - Report to Council by 8/ 1/84 . 2 .2 SUBGOAL - To strengthen the Council and to improve the efficiency and workability of this form of municipal government . 2 .21 Objective - Improve staff/Council relationship by encouraging more Council visits to staff during working hours to obtain a better insight of the work , programs , policies , etc . of the department . Much progress has already been made in this area . Action - Council members should call department heads and schedule tours , review of specialized equipment and procedures ( eg . snow plowing) . 2 .22 Ob,jgctive - Address staff' s concern about surprises and comments at Council meetings that affect credibility. Action - Council should try to discuss unresolved items before meetings and channel them to staff so an adequate response can be prepared . Action - Council should try to avoid disregarding staff recommendations regarding contractor ' s requests for waiver of code requirements . 2 .23 Objective - Make a Council commitment to the C. I . P. in sufficient time to budget engineering staff time . Actio - Review C .I . P. in sufficient detail to make a commitment in July. 2.24 Objective - Staff memos should include reasons for both approval/denial when recommendations come to Council . Actin - More improvement needed . Staff memos should cover the "what if" question as they relate to all alternatives . 2 .25 Q_bjgQ_ti _ -The Council members should understand the procedures of the Council meeting so that they can serve the best interests of the governing system. Action - Review procedures annually. 2 .26 Objective - Goals and Objectives should be an on- going thing during the year , as something comes to mind or a problem surfaces , turn it in . Action - Add objectives as needed during the year when 3-4 new objectives are suggested . Government Servicez 3 .0 GOAD, - To provide the most effective and efficient level of service possible to meet the needs of the citizens of Shakopee . 3 . 1 SUBGOAL - To develop and improve the efficiency and safety of the City ' s transportation plans . 3 .11 O ieetive - Bridge and by-pass needed . AQtion - The residential growth of Shakopee maybe restricted by lack of convenient access to the twin cities . The County Road 18 bridge crossing is becoming more critical . The City should continue to push for the bridge funding including transfer of the excise tax retroactive to July 1 , 1983 to fund the By- pass. 3 . 12 Objective - The Valley Mall traffic control circulation situation is to be corrected . Action - Engineer ' s Twelfth Street report should be implemented with the construction of 13th Street connecting the mall . 3 . 13 Objective - Traffic leaving Valleyfair should be corrected to prevent unlawful U-turns . Action, - Mn/Dot to construct in 1984. 3 . 14 —12jective - Intersection signals of CR 83 and Highway 101 . Action - Scheduled 1984 CIP, County project . 3 . 15 OftieQtive - Complete the street preservation and rehabilitation policy that classifies how the City will finance maintenance for all streets . -4- Actign - Complete schedule for systematic street maintenance based upon payment and traffic analysis study being done by Engineering and the above mentioned policy due May 1984 . Action - Schdule streets to receive overlays and seal coats in 1984 by June 1 , 1984 . Action - Get the 4th Avenue Project underway in 1984. 3 . 16 OReduce street maintenance costs/- responsibilities by systematically vacating un- needed streets . Actio - Based upon the reports from 3 . 15 above , outline streets to be vacated and then try a street vacation public hearing on the least needed street(s) . Action - Encourage residents and businesses to initate vacations of unnecessary streets . Action - Investigate a turn-over program whereby residents/businesses would agree to return vacated streets R-O-W to the City if the City would clean-up the street and create a marketable lot( s) . Secure a written legal opinion from O ' Connor Hannen . Draft a policy addressing even handed action by Council on all types of street vacations . 3 . 17 Objective - Improve City traffic signing . A-c- . DL - Check all traffic signing in Shakopee for proper readibilty and locational placement . Action - Remove yield signs and replace them with stop signs where appropriate by 1985 . Action - Improve citizen awareness and compliance with traffic signing for all vehicles - cars , tractors , bicycles , snowmobiles , etc . thru targeted enforcement and public information . 3 . 18 Obj�� .Y� - The 4 cents gas tax increase has been approved by the legislature and the Governor. We need to work successfully to ensure that the By-pass is constructed . gQtj-on - Lobby to help the bill through the legislative in 184 . 3 . 19 D-bjective - Follow-up on MTC opt-out alternatives and S.F . 884 transit financing . A_g_>t Dn - Implement a subsidized dial-a-ride service in Shakopee and van pools for commuters upon approval of opt-out . Clarify the City ' s authority in levying for transit. Is it limited to the Metro-wide levy amount? Action - Monitor legislation and actively support restructuring of MTC . 3 . 19A Objective - Get street cuts patched in a timely manner . Action - A problem still exists with Contractors maintaining their utility trenches in a callous manner. There are still a few loose ends with our street permit process , although we are close to controlling their work. They should provide phone number list , etc . 3 . 19B Objective - Improve traffic flow at CR 17 and 4th Avenue . Action - Analize the need for traffic control at 4th and County Rd . 17 by July 1 , 1984 . 3 . 19C Objectee - Develop a "thru" street on Minnesota or Market . Action - Coordinate with traffic study being done by Westwood and report by 5/ 1/84 . 3 . 19D Objective - Upgrade or remove railroad crossing . Action - Coordinate with traff ice study being done by Westwood and the Downtown Committee and report by 5/ 1/84 . 3 . 19E Objective - We need handicapped parking stalls in the downtown area . Action - Report on potential locations , usefullness , etc . by 5/ 1/84 . 3 . 19F Ob,ipav - Review by Council and appropriate staff the Block 50/Alley Improvements . Action - Schedule on site inspection with all parties in April of 1984 . 3 .2 SUBGOAL - Improve regulations , management thru zoning of property within the City . 3 .21 Objec iv - The City should insure up-keep of streets and utilities in private homes associations thru/by the homes association deed covenants . Action - Staff should draft a memo to Council regarding this by October 1 , 1984. 3 .3 SUBGOAL - Improve the management of City owned property ( parks , buildings , etc . ) 3 .31 Objective - Emphasize development and improved maintenance rather than new acquisitions . Action - Doing as per Six-Year Plan . -6- 3 .32 Objective - Clear title of railroad property north of 4th Avenue that cross City owned lots (Nos. 3 and 4 in Block 52) and develop lots or sell them. Action - City Attorney processing sale to City . 3 .33 Objective - Encourage Scott County and the Met Council to acquire and develop regional trails thru Shakopee to O 'Dowd Lake and along the Minnesota River that will be of benefit to local citizens . Action - Council should support the trail and staff should monitor it 's progress to assist Council in timely follow-up. 3 .34 Objective - The Mill Pond was not treated with copper sulfate to hold down algae bloom in 1983 because of the initial program turn down by the D. N. R. Action - The reversal of this decision will allow this program to be completed in 1984 by City staff. 3 .35 Objective - Place ALPHA ownership file on computer . Action - Complete by 12/31/84 . 3 .4 SUBGOAL - Monitor appropriate level of Community Services Department programs . 3 .41 Q�j_ective - The Community Sevices Department should deal with the issue of township financial support for Community Services . Action - Develop recommendation for City Council and School Board documenting the disparity by October 1 , 1984. 3 .5 SUBGOAL - The City should maintain sound fiscal management procedures to insure that needed services can be provided . 3 .51 Objective - Completeselection of appropriate micro- computer systems and install equipment in 1984 . Action - Follow-up on the Task Force Recommendation with the purchase of a networked micro-computer system , it ' s installation and implimentation by June 1 , 1984 . 3 .52 Objective - Continue to pursue changes in Fiscal disparities . Action - The City lost the case in the State Supreme Court and should press the issue legislatively through the Metropolitan Caucus in 1984-85 . 3 . 53 Objective - Support SPUC in pursuing acquisition of REA. -7- Action - The condemnation decision was unfavorable and SPUC is considering next course of action . 3 .54 Objective - Support SPUC in pursuing acquisition of NSP. Action - SPUC - NSP negotiations still underway . 3 . 56 Objective - Change State Local Government Aid Formula ( LGA) Action - Pursue legislative changes thru the Municipal Caucus in the 1984-95 Legislative Session . 3 .58 Objective - Establish financing for new storm sewer construction Action - Study and possibly implement a storm sewer fee for newly developing areas by setting a dollar per acre fee like Burnsville and Savage have established by 10/ 1/84 . 3 .59 Objective - Avoid a shotgun approach to grants and development incentive to focus on those areas which are most significant to the City . Action - On-going . 3 .6 SUBGQAL - To improve and make more efficient park services to the public . 3 .61 Objective - Analize playground equipment stock for replacement and/or upgrading . Action - Establish a schedule for systematic review of all park equipment and begin with the 1st park( s) in 1984. 3 .62 Objective - Post rules and regulations in all city parks . Action - Begin with signs for Holmes , the one there is in bad or sad shape . Signs should be out of reach and large enough to catch the eye of ball players , etc . 3 .7 SUBGOAL - Improve the current "perspective" citizens have of police officer ' s overall concern for the citizens . 3 .71 Objective - Continue proper miscellaneous non- criminal code enforcement efforts by police officers . Action - Clearly establish the level of expected working knowledge of these City codes ( junk cars , park rules , parking rules , junkordinances , etc . ) and the level of expected enforcement after discussing this with City Council . Action - Enforce park rules. -8- 3 .72 Objective - Better control of loose dogs . Action - Police and animal warden should recommend ways to improve the service and list cost by June 1 , 1984 . Report on number of licensed vs non-licensed dogs . Work with vets to improve licensing . ction - Develop a coordinated S.O. P. for all departments dealing with animal control (Clerk , Police , Planning and Animal Warden) . 3 .8 SUBGOAL - Reduce the cost of services provided citizens through the City ' s sanitary sewer system. 3 .81 Objective - Reduce MWCC monthly charge for sewage treatment . Action - Keep working with Governor ' s office and other groups to put pressure on the MWCC to cut costs outlined in the Bollen ' s Report. Action - Reopen books to review fee/charge computation formulas . 3 . 82 Obiect_i_U - Implement the recommendation from the I & I study which equal approximately $39 ,000 . Action - Begin work on the specific recommendation in 1984 that don ' t require budget amendments . 3 .83 Objective - Provide some type of financial relief for sewer back-up clean-up. Action - There is a failure to provide adequate compensation to citizens who suffer losses due to City Services such as sewer and water damage . Investigate forming a committee to review claims for sewer back-up, because the present policy does not protect or help home owners . This committee would review any claims and make a recommendation to the remainder of the Council and a contingency fund for awards and indemnities would have to be budgeted . Report by 6/ 1/84 . 3 . 9 SUBGQAL - Periodically review regulating ordinances . 3 . 91 Objective - Review ordinances as to their impact on citizens, for example , the odd/even parking is annoying when people have parties. Possibly we could change it to 2 : 00 a .m. to 8 : 00 a .m. Another example, the snowmobile ordinance may be so stringent that anyone who would stop when asked before , wouldn ' t do so now. Action - Schedule review of odd/even parking ordinance in May of 1984 . Action - Schedule review of snowmobile ordinance in Sept. of 1984 . -9- Physical Develo m .nt 4 .0 Goal - To provide a consistant and constant plan to enhance the resources , and strengthen the economic base of the area and provide for the enjoyment and well-being of the citizens of Shakopee . 4 . 1 SUBGOAL - Develop and use capital improvement program (CIP)and capital equipment program on a 6 year basis to increase the coordination of service and the economic well being of the community. Hold a separate work session on the C . I . P. 4. 11 Obj iy - We need to be more accurate in CIP projected projects for the nearest 2-3 years . Action - Fine tune the process to be more accurate during budget preparations for 1985 . 4. 12 Obj iy . - Upper Valley drainage plan . Action - Engineering following-up on joint powers agreement with Jackson Township, etc . as per Chapter #509 . Drainage analysis for the joint powers agreements and a letter from MN/Dot combining the drainage with By-pass . Action - Have agreement executed by July 1 , 1984 , the 509 deadline . 4 . 13 Objective - Drainage problems ( 1 ) Horizon Heights , (2) 2nd Avenue and ( 3) 4th and Minnesota . Action - Grant application submitted for No. 1 and approved for 1984 . No action scheduled for 2 and 3 in 1984. 4 . 14 Objective - New City Hall . Will we need a new one in 5 years and should we set aside the money? Our buildings are very energy inefficient. Action - List in 1984-89 Six Year Capital Improvement Plan . Action - Work on location of a new City Hall including , but not limited to , the Downtown Committee ' s suggestions Action - This project should go forward when the current buildings are sold for redevelopment . 4 . 15 Objective - Support SPUC in continued Waterline looping. Action - On-going job of SPUC . 4 . 16 Objective - Complete needed storm sewer system throughout the City . -10- Action - Follow-up only when there is a clearly critical need and/or when residents are interested in it . 4. 17 Objective - Complete construction for railroad parking lot. Action - This project is budgeted for 1984 and should be coordinated with the Downtown Committee ' s program for ' 84. 4 . 18 Objective - Continue City-wide sidewalk program. Action - Complete the sidewalk system in Shakopee in conjunction with the school ' s safe street program. The City needs a formal policy on where sidewalks are to be constructed , how we pay for them, and what their purpose , function should be ( used for snow storage on boulevards during winter) . Coordinate with the County. The 1983 sidewalk, curb and gutter , and driveway program worked well , let 's really publicize it and push it again in 1984 . 4 . 19 Objective - Reduce street maintenance cost by completing curb section on all streets . Action - Report on needed curbing throughout town and determine if it is practical to install it where the need is the greatest . Continue to promote the City ' s successful voluntary curb gutter & sidewalk fix-up program. Economic DeyeJ�Ua_enj 5 .0 GOAL - Have an economic development plan that will create jobs and diversify the City ' s economic base . 5 . 1 SUBGOAL - Continue with the advances made by the Downtown Committee to redevelop the downtown area without letting the Racetrack development sideline downtown efforts. 5 . 11 Objective - The City should make funding tools available for the downtown redevelopment. The private sector , however , must participate finan- cially (50/50 or some other percentage) . Action - Pursue hotel/motel development feasibility with Valleyfair and the Mdewakanton Sioux , and construction of a 100 unit multi-family housing project in 1984-85 . Action - Downtown redevelopment should be designated to capture tourism trade from Valleyfair , Murphy ' s Landing and the Renaissance Festival . The City needs to put on a new face for tourists going through the community , provide adequate motel facilities and boat landing access to the river. -11- Action - Review the City ' s interest in promoting development and construction of a professional building on Atwood . The Mayor and City Adminis- trator were serving on a task force for the hospital 's clinic . Now M.A. Martinson is proceeding and the City should schedule a separate Council meeting to present and discuss redevelopment possibilities for the downtown . Do not elimate Block #57 parking for the Professional Building (note people will not pay to park in this area so a parking ramp probably won ' t work) . Action -The I . C.C . , Planning Commission , Downtown Committee and downtown merchants should attend a joint meeting and City staff should outline implementation plans after consultant completes overall redevelopment plan . Action - Design the funding tools used in TIF la so that a strong revolving commercial loan program for rehabing commercial businesses can be established . Action - Continue efforts to insure that other taxing jurisdictions , local citizens, and potential developers understand TIF and to what extent it is available in Shakopee . 5 . 12 Objective - The Downtown Redevelopment Project should get off the ground this year with some actual physical improvements being completed . Council may be faced with some difficult decisions . Action - The Concept Plan is completed . The next step is to complete engineering and detail de:,ign work for some bid letting in 1984 of at least one project . 5 . 13 Objective - Establish a Chamber/City plan to get a more consolidated and stronger retail core to Shakopee downtown. Action - Work with the Downtown Committee , Chamber, Consultants and businesses to establish a plan to encourage new and relocate existing retail/office businesses in the retail core area to make a stronger retail center as designed in the Downtown Concept Plan . Action - Review Main Street application for 1984-85 by 5 .2 SUBGOAL - Createeconomicdevelopmentopportunitiesfornew jobs and expanding tax base . 5 .21 Objective - Try to attract new business to Shakopee . Actio - Develop programs to advertise and promote the City 's businesses and attract private financing for business development . (St . Paul ' s program for small business is an example) . -12- Action - Work to strengthen the Chamber of Commerce to enable it to be a stronger partner in downtown redevelopment . Resurrect the industrial develop- ment corporation and increase it ' s role in downtown redevelopment and check into joint promotions with mall west of town. 5 .22 Obb jegt ive - Try to attract major housing developers to Shakopee . The City lacks housing in the management price range probably because of the lack of amenities and a highway linkage to Hennepin County. A t� ion - Contact potential large scale developers with concrete proposal such as a PUD using T. I .F . on on the old correctional facility site . 5 .3 SUBGOAL - Review procedures and costs associated with new development. 5 .31 0 iec iv - Try to develop a team approach to development inquiries to : ( 1 ) Provide better service and , ( 2) To coordinate internally the flow of information. Action - Complete S.O. P. by 6/ 1/84 . 5 .32 Objective - Review Computation and assumptions for SAC and MWCC charges . Action - Complete review by 9/ 1/84 . 5 .4 SUBGOAL - Create the financing for key development needs . 5 .41 Objective - Refinance the K-Mart TIF for 15 years to get the $6 ,000 ,000 for the Downtown Project and the Upper Valley Project . Action - Complete the refinancing in April 1984. Environmentl 6 .0 LDAL - To protect and preserve the natural environment of Shakopee , including land , air and water. 6 . 1 SUBGOAL - To insure the well being of the community ' s environment and to effectively monitor and manage it ' s resources . 6 . 11 Objective - Follow hazardous waste siting process . Action - On-going . Shakopee ' s industrial park has been included . Our Building Inspector is on the committee . 6 . 12 Obj iv - Work for the sale of the Shakopee sludge farm by the MWCC . Action - The site has been found to be intrinsically suitable by the PCA hearing examiner for land -13- Action - Work to strengthen the Chamber of Commerce to enable it to be a stronger partner in downtown redevelopment. Resurrect the industrial develop- ment corporation and increase it ' s role in downtown redevelopment and check into joint promotions with mall west of town . 5 .22 Obi cit i ve - Try to attract major housing developers to Shakopee. The City lacks housing in the management price range probably because of the lack of amenities and a highway linkage to Hennepin County. Action - Contact potential large scale developers with concrete proposal such as a PUD using T. I .F. on on the old correctional facility site . 5 .3 SUBGOAL - Review procedures and costs associated with new development . 5 .31 Objective - Try to develop a team approach to development inquiries to: ( 1 ) Provide better service and , ( 2) To coordinate internally the flow of information. Act - Complete S.O. P. by 6/ 1/84 . 5 .32 Objective - Review Computation and assumptions for SAC and MWCC charges . Action - Complete review by 9/ 1/84 . 5 .4 SUBGOAL - Create the financing for key development needs . 5 .41 Objective - Refinance the K-Mart TIF for 15 years to get the $6 ,000 ,000 for the Downtown Project and the Upper Valley Project . Action - Complete the refinancing in April 1984. Environmental 6 .0 GOAL - To protect and preserve the natural environment of Shakopee , including land , air and water . 6 . 1 SUBGOAL - To insure the well being of the community ' s environment and to effectively monitor and manage it ' s resources . 6 . 11 Objective - Follow hazardous waste siting process. Action - On-going. Shakopee ' s industrial park has been included . Our Building Inspector is on the committee . -14- 6 . 12 Obj ; v - Work for the sale of the Shakopee sludge farm by the MWCC. Action - The site has been found to be intrinsically suitable by the PCA hearing examiner for land spreading at agronomic rates. Staff must continue to push this issue and seek the sale of the property by the MWCC (update Ray Siebenaler) . 6 . 13 Objective - The City needs to protect the public water system in the flood plain . The hydrant vents under the high water mark. Action - Pump house No. 1 is in the flood plain and needs flood proofing since the building is owned by the City . Work with SPUC on this project . Housing & Bgadevelopment Authority 7 .0 SUBGOAL - Have a housing and Redevelopment plan that provides and promotes the creation of needed housing units for Shakopee ' s growing population . 7 . 1 SUBGOAL - An indepth look and attention by the HRA Department for improved community service to housing developments. 7 . 11 Objective - Could the City provide more types of housing? Action - Staff should renew contacts with potential residential developers and show them the community. Action - Staff should take the County HRA rehab program referral calls and list them for follow-up purposes to insure Shakopee residents benefit from the program. Staff should also check the percentage of rehab loans to insure that Shakopee gets a fair percentage . Action - HRA staff needs to put together a program that can be used to build moderate income housing units on the vacant lots around the City using T. I .F. without relying on Mn HFA mortgages . 7 . 12 Objective - Encourage development of areas with unique problems such as Section 6 , north of County Road 16 now served with utilities , Robert Pit , etc . Action - Normal development incentives are probably not sufficient to encourage development on certain properties. Certain property may need the assistance of T. I .F . , revenue bonds , mortgage revenue notes , etc . That would tip the balance in favor of development . Such a program would not be limited to one location . -15- Tn . rgovernmen IRg� at ons 8 .0 GOAL - It shall be the goal of the City of Shakopee to work constructively on relationships with other governmental agencies that have taxing and regulatory impact on the City ' s citizens . 8. 1 SUBGOAL - The City should seek to better understand , coordinate and integrate it ' s services with Scott County to better serve it ' s citizens and insure citizens are not taxed for duplicate services . 8 . 11 Objective - Citizens should be informed about the level of Police Department activities/workload that is related to Scott County court scheduling problem. Action - This should be addressed collectively by the Mayors and Administrators I groups in Scott County and possibly Dakota County with all jurisdictions addressing the court system problem as a unit . 8 . 13 Objective - The City should actively continue it ' s efforts to convince Scott County to study alternate forms of government . Action - This effort should come thru the Scott County Mayors and Administrators Group . 8 . 14 Objective - The City should continue to work with the County to eliminate all duplication of City and County services such as overlapping police/sheriff department services . Action - Continue current discussions of this type thru the Mayors and Administrators Group and other groups. Action - Scott County has at least 100 miles of County Road that should be turned back to the Cities and Townships. Work on with County Engineer. 8 . 16 Objective - The Scott County mill rate is relatively high compared to the mill rate in the six other metropolitan counties . This negatively impacts Shakopee and should be investigated to determine what the possible causes are e.g. costly county services , fiscal disparities , etc . Action - Pursue thru Scott County Mayors and Administrator Group . 8 .2 SUBGOAL - The City should seek to keep it ' s relationship with SPUC in good shape to insure maximum cooperation and coordination. 8.21 Objective - We have two separate governments in Shakopee that set policy affecting citizens , the City and SPUC . The City and SPUC should review together their relationship as it affects the citizens they deal with on a daily basis . -16- Actor. - Hold a joint meeting to review goals and objectives in May 184. 8 .3 SUBGOAL - The City of Shakopee should respond to State and regional policies, regulation and taxes that affect Shakopee ' s citizens . 8 .31 Qb )ec ive - What role or level of involvement should City staff play in monitoring Met Council , MWCC , MPCA , etc . ? A tion - Council ' s specific response for the City Engineer was approximately 4 hours per month by serving on a committee that deals with one of these agencies . Action - Follow the highway jurisdictional study now being undertaken by the Legislature . 8.32 Obiec>iiye - Staff should continue to work towards equity in state aids to schools , cities and counties , equity in transit funding and equity in the fiscal disparities formula . Action - This should be carried on thru the Municipal Caucus. 8 . 4 SUBGOAL - The City of Shakopee should monitor care provided it ' s citizens by other agencies particularly those who are elderly or economically disadvantaged even though services are provided by other agencies . 8 . 41 Ob iecti ve - More senior citizen protection such as a ambulance and individual call system for stroke or heart attach victims who live alone . Action. - Report on possible programs by 10/ 1/84 . 8 . 5 SUBGQA - Clarify relationships with the Prior Lake/Spring Lake Watershed District . 8 .51 0 je terve - h11th_ciraw. Cb-t J of �hal���PP 1 n u frn i Ai i^vi Lake/Spring Lake Watershed District . Action - Complete petition to withdraw by 11/ 1/84. - .7-