HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/12/1984 TENTATIVE AGENDA
ADJ .REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA APRIL 12, 1984
Mayor Reinke presiding
11 Roll Call at 7 :00 p .m.
21 Presentation by Housing Alliance and Discussion of Potential
for Housing Development in the Downtown
31 Presentation of Development Plans by State Department of
Corrections
4] Proposed Development Moritorium as Related to Racetrack
51 Authorize Study of Sixth Avenue Sanitary Sewer Deficiencies
61 Other Business
71 Adjourn to Tuesday, April 17, 1984 at 7 :00 p .m.
John K. Anderson
City Administrator
OLDER POPULATION IN CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Age Range Female Ages Male Ages
55 - 59 179 183
60 - 61 60 61
62 - 64 77 83
65 - 74 253 195
75 - 84 178 107
85 plus 82* 30
Total population: 9,941 city of Shakopee, census 1980.
*high frail population
— i
C�
fa
Ra! s
APR 10 1984 the Housing Alliance
CITE' 0 F 8 roiP Engn
i
AGENDA
HOUSING FOR THE OLDER PERSONS IN SHAKOPEE
12 April 1984
City Hall
7:00 p.m.
I. History/The Housing Alliance in Shakopee
A. Levee Drive project/Arvid Elness Architects, Inc.
B. Petition
C. Questionnaire: Developed, distributed, results computed
D. Feasibility study conducted
E. Sites studied
II. Present Conditions/The Housing Alliance in Shakopee
A. The Housing Alliance seeks support of a sponsor
1. Objectives and goals of downtown redevelopment committee
indentified
2. Conclusions of market analysis identify housing needs of
community
B. Sponsorship identified
C. Race track
D. Steering Committee formed
III. Future/The Housing Alliance in Shakopee
A. Ideas/possibilities/dreams
B. Involve leadership of community
1. City/church/hospital
2. Individual older persons
C. Site selection: Identify possibilities
D. Continued support of city/community
E. Enlist local businesses, i .e. contractor
F. Development
IV. Open Discussion and Comments from those in Attendance
A. City/community sponsorship
B. The Housing Alliance as a facilitator/implementer
C. Feasibility identified
200 BUTLER NORTH o 5101STAVE. N.o MINNFAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55403 e PHONE;(612)339-6122
Law Offices of
KRASS, MEYER, KANNING & WALSTEN�
Chartered
Suite 300
Marschall Road Business Center Phillip R. Krass Paralegals
327 South Marschall Road Barry K. Meyer Susan M.Blown
F.O. Box 216 Philip T. K.anning Barbara J.Hedstrom
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Trevor R. Walsten
(612) 445-5080
MEMORANDUM
rR
TO: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director ;- ,;
FROM: Phillip R. Kra ss
i
DATE: April 10, 1984
RE: Potential Conflict of Interest
You have informed me that the Housing and. Redevelopment Authority is consider-
ing a project which may involve the consolidation in ownership by the HRA of
an entire block for resale to a private developer. Among the property owners
of the block in question are two members of the HRA (and therefore the City
Council) . You have asked me whether or not it would be a conflict of interest
for those HRA members to agree contractually to the sale of their land to the
BRA.
I have done a considerable amount of research as a result of your request and
I have found the conflict of interest statutes and rules to be somewhat con-
fusing and sometimes conflicting . I will attempt to set forth those statutes
and rules as I believe they apply, and at the conclusion of this memorandum, I
will recommend to you the course of action I believe to be the most proper
under these circumstances .
First of all, you should be aware that there is a separate statute governing
conflict of interest for HRA members or employees . That statute is found in
the general housing redevelopment statute which is 462.411 et. seq ., and is
found specifically at Section 462.432, a copy of which I attach. This statute
generally requires a disclosure of any potential conflict and sets forth rules
governing the activities of the commissioner . This is a relatively new law
repealing Section 462.431, which was much stricter arra simply forbid any
commissioner to have any interest, direct or indirect, with any property
included or planned to be included in any project. This obviously is a sub-
stantial change in the law and if this were the only statute in question,
would minimize the difficulties faced by HRA commissioners. Unfortunately,
statute 471.87 is a general statute precluding public officers from having a
financial interest in any sale, lease or contract or benefit financially
therefrom. Violation of that statute is a gross misdemeanor . I enclose a
copy of 471.87 and you will note that it refers to a series of exceptions
located in 471.88. The exceptions are narrowly drawn and involve such things
as designation of banks and official newspapers and would not provide an
exception to the circumstances you described to me.
Page 2
Consequently, while it is apparent that the legislature intended by the
adoption of Section 462 .432 and the repeal of Section 452 .431 to remove by the
disclosure measures provided therein, any impediment to IIRA commissioners
dealing with the HRA on property sales, no comparable change in Section 471.137
was made, and consequently, I would advise our HRA commissioners never to
contractually agree to the sale of property in which they have an interest to
the commission.
I have received significant input on this serious problem from the League of
Minnesota Cities and discussed it at length with the City's bond attorneys who
helped establish our downtown redevelopment district. Our conclusion is that
there does appear to be a solution to the problem and the solution is the
acquisition of the property in question by eminent domain. If the HRA deter-
mines that it desires to proceed with the project you outlined, it can
recommend to the City Council the acquisition of the block in question by right
of eminent domain. The Council is then authorized to proceed with that acqui-
sition by condemnation. Our HRA commissioners will then receive for their
property a value established by a three member condemnation panel, or if one
party or the other appealed the condemnation panel's findings, then the valua-
tion would be determined by a jury in Scott County District Court . Under those
circumstances, no commissioner would be entering into any contract and there-
fore will not have violated the law. I would like to emphasize that this
method is not to be construed as an effort to circumvent the intent and purpose
of the statute, but to the contrary, is considered not only a legitimate method
of acquisition, but the only proper method of acquisition under the circum
stares you described.
One final note of caution. The commissioners involved should not vote on
recommendation of this acquisition and should abstain from any vote involving
this acquisition or the project in question both as members of. the HRA., and as
members of the City Council. Under the law and those circumstances, the two
individuals with conflicts would not be counted as a quorum and two of the
remaining three HRA commissioners, and three of the remaining City Council
members will constitute a majority with respect to any votes .involving this
project .
I am hopeful this information will be of assistance to you and please feel
free to contact me if you should have further questions .
PRK:pk
cc: Mark Nagel
Enclosures
C, i C 0 C cl O^ n L—
'''' U „C ^,•.^^. C.C ' `) p u lu.. - v; b v v G, ,J I O
^j ooyc ° N•" � c >. EwE � y•N �•� O 3 Eci ;° yca
L: v: uy. ° C•c '�-'s .G 't C V 3 OVl .�' >."' cd w
..« " .. O .-+ ° c7 O .-+ c!'C C.D y .Q .b.... u O °'.-+ C !,. u .+, y L N V :`. O h 14:
E .�„' V _✓ ;1 :.J j V .�", •r, .��.. C'... L L a � � Y C ,L.. � •�- c, 4j •v. ,V zi i' •r. .r.'� C.�•-. �,^ 7
-a O F.0
G G :�,�",• C^... C V M C C .G y .... vc «:+ L > a C% Y •+ a�, C, ..+ O 1- u: O..0 O
. `.. ..�•„ O ✓: 4. v u C C v -+ C cl C) c; }' ►• :n O Y .y..- v. w.
o c u L y•y wry u o
-0
Vv: L .�'7 G v O V O ~. v, C•r r-° L .cJ• u cJ N C ?E F, C ._ `"o.
o � o.raaon 4 ° uvy �'� b ° }�'na ' 4cOc �,o � � J :c= ` � EE � i-
#- c CL ..•. C�,,. y s s s ' e,_, C '� .c7 i, - •G =.JC J" C N ` G c
• h
"'- = ✓^ ^ .`,J .,� 3 '�' ° U .� .a V cC :� O C L r. -.. i..:-' �'•. .+ 3
✓ c`w ros f ''
,Ly cv5mcd
G'
C •�, F M^ C-3 A L J p GJ i :r
V,,, tr
O C,L 3 L U•a i..� :J ^ L O L :'J U V ow, :J C r'� ... �-• ,.
L O r C ...
,. u u O_' � C � L Y� i •1 [[�� y 3�. �
y ._ •J, y .. .. fj .- ,+y^• V L r y :! V! L .- l-. C F y. V. L C .. V..... "J L .•' O 1
C y °•C.�: G O C; 7 !' .... «� C O O :V �; 7.w vcl «+ w. .:t ti �..^. .. /' L• `- - C
r. _� C.�C `y `C •.J'� � O U C•� � !. s_i. 1• i. � w L :+. J V i � � 4 C 'l. ,�; �.G �' C .. � L—~ �
L• C '� L 3 vl _C - cC -� '_t
L• ` p C L ° M 2 C C p O C c7 Y 7 �� :7 •G .7 •% �'v. r. :r, w -.:L
tj
Zd C
� _ ,t. :� C O ` ... _. fir.'`. - O C� � : y :3 �' � y u r' _ •-'... - 7 _ -L
•/ _ _ y Q yv„ =Ltj
i. a C _ L L C l C• , i L Y r _ �.
_ �- '� ! .. j - L - Z L ^ '/; C J .. •p C Z - - -. �, w _ _ si l _.. - j L.
73
tx
- � ,- ✓ c0 T H � .4 � G .. ,� C .. � '1 C is :: •L' - .. :� � _ � -_
_ 7 Y C �• •�_..�1.: �. ti C "O_�, C0; C 6 c ._, c i. C.•r. lO .. .. `
V 'd� v j S .� •% cl^C pi
,c ' _ ",s ►-� �yaJ ° ° oi � � E � �- - Gco� c �= c ��=y s•c s:. �= c
oc
FEE
i , G c v _ - ? _ r i c
L•' '!, :S t O IC ,. ^ ILO L
� ` :"�•E'L y C.. y •_' C ` w V: 7 J'y, a .q � 1. �a`� � I � i. _ � -'- .. - u
�; :i >. 1�'•' i. .-...r S � C: U � �.J. t y, � � va v. -z;F '� j � c �_• -. 7 .+ i,; - = v ^. - -
IX
%.
a
c
cl
x ° �c o c sy •Ki. ,
c cn "!_i ^ , = a L O �C 'n 2 G C t'• U N C V t
C•1 cd .. v C L C G - $
O crz: Lam.r
C `'- ^! CC.+ : '!, CJ Y, _ ^J Y C V^ •;� [ t^ L• v V rr, - C Ir C
zD o. i, L •' 7 _ KO C
y
j ? i
,tz*��F k� „ ,. 'F wi� F� °' � yg•" a 1
f
717•N 3„K 1,:. t ..��pp Jyy -e '-•-y �_
��5..:��', �R � ,.. � r � �� �x ,. �i r�, � J .,a4.�' '^�, Pyr 'S,tIK ?5 1$a g•e."may- h� � �#�4�1;.
�,,,.. ,��7 '!z•a..'�'`�bb. ?� .; i_ .. -« "..�. ...• .i� 3Fy111,, Yyr ,.�P, �4:, 's�' '�', �...,.1�"•1�+L'•� ^.,�,
t'
RIGHTS, POWERS, DUTIES § 471.87
471.$7 Public officers, interest in contract; penalty
Except as authorized in section 471.88,.a public officer who is
authorized to take part in any manner in making any sale, lease,
or contract in his official capacity shall not voluntarily have a
personal financial interest in that sale, lease, or contract or per-
sonally benefit financially therefrom. Every
violates this provisoll is guilty of a gross misdemeanor., ic officer who
c. 379, § Amended by Laws 1955, c. 41, § 1.
Historical Note
enacted this .,. , ,
r r tloa brut idad: -41:'.31] and rellr;tled 5t.1tNf), ,- �' '
1.:�celrt as amborir -a in sectiml V 1: t 117, 4� � �s� ,.
lmhlic officer %cho i, attthorizeil to '
take 1rar1 in :uta' n:tnnr•r in loakin
attp :de, le; . ► Prior Laws: , ,k
, .
• 1 1', nl' nt hr'i' 1't 111t 1;1r'I in `���
him uffu•utl r;ll,;u•it}' �Ir.,ll Inrt rulrin- \linrt.`t.l!)I!I,a li_n.o{.
I:u•1!}' hacr' a 1u•t:.oti.rl fiu:uu•i:ti in- Ln��', 1!{11, c.
Ir•n•.
or contract lar'ws M31, . _1:!, t.
t in snch .:r lr•. I,as,•,
or i�•r.onall} beuefU fin:urri:rll�' �t'lt) 7 6 halt:,.
thr•rr from. 1:ger} lrul lie officer echo t'''11 St 1!h_:3, G 10:305.
%iel:Ues this lrrovkion is .uilt.v of a Rev�t.l!II:S, a,��17•
tni..rh•tn•:utor." itc•c-.LIW., I!N)5, `5113:'.
I.;rn's 131-51, c, 379 also ana'udwi �L Pell.t'oilr•,
:165.37 as .:uuemh•d ant 9
Cross References
1re:r trrb•�'eloirment u{r ur;t' uffiri:tls aUd ent{rlulees, sr•r• l7Y.INi.
('• nru� eonunissiouors• ser• §375.o!).
('o I I IIt 3•official US, .rv• r?:311.1 S. }
ollibilIod. .ee Q 171..s,�.
Ili ha;t�' delr;u'tau nI rnllrlo�y•c•s yr
0 ]131.33, ;k � ^..,. •
Jiorettandi`r' not hr be lou'r•Intsr•d from stale agen•ies by lolblic eullrloy'ees, str
nhrrJ' cities,c•uuocil members,ser'
s .
'1'on•u officers,sr.•C:365.37. z
f
Uniform Municipal Contracting Law, see 5 •171.315. �'��•,- .� '�
Law Review Commentaries
1',rlr.trur[ico twists. •: � r'f.
I:rl«:uri 1: tract. I'eh. 1951, :i:,Shalliro, :22,
\Iinn.Law Reeiety w
1941, 15 \linn.l•a��' 1(ecie�e 131.7. Gal. c e4A
Wale of mi-1- h:rrallsr' to city by
Iuterr•�t of lolhlic officer in uutuir i- s"
nn nlbr'r of cit} r•unnr il. 110'31 i.riali, * a °
ial rontr,uL lan. 1!1:39. .a Nliuu.Lmv
�II \Iinn.L:1w IG•vicw5G1.
g h
\luuiri{cal enc roc:It ion., right
dales to lalblic entltlo}'res. fan. r
1 rir 1 of ]!b!_',fir; \I{u11.1,MV 1(VVie11'
la\ raver •nni
1 to olljolr! of :n'oirl :r eou- `. •a k {�, �'. `�+.,:,
t
'- 343
m'
�'w
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judi Simac, City Planner
RE: Proposed Development Moratorium as related to
Racetrack Decision
DATE: April 10, 1984
Introduction:
In the time since the racetrack decision was made, I have
been receiving quite a few inquiries regarding commercial and
residential development within Shakopee. Although the Environ-
mental Impact Statement estimated new development as a result
of the racetrack location at 9 to 14 acres, there is reason to
believe that there may be more than anticipated.
Background:
A couple a major inquiries have been for hotel/motel develop-
ment, in which one of the sites would require a rezoning. At this
time I am aware of two possible rezoning requests which may be
submitted prior to April 19th, the deadline for Planning Commission
review in May. In light of this , the City may want to consider a
moratorium on development until a comprehensive review and possible
change in plan can be made in order to achieve orderly development.
We have received a legal opinion on a proposed moratorium.
According to Mn. Statues 462 . 355, Subd. 4 , the Council can implement
a moratorium on building permits, rezonings, conditional uses and
variances to give time to study the ramifications of the racetrack
decision on the present comprehensive plan and other official land
use controls . A moratorium ordinance ( see attachment ) may be
effective for up to one year (with possible extensions ) and may be
enacted by appropriate vote of council.
Alternatives:
The proposed moratorium should define exactly what applications
shall be "frozen" and what geographic area of the city should be
included.
I . Applications :
a . Rezoning
b. Conditional Use
C. Variances
d. Building Permits (excepting necessary permits for
repairs and alterations or for buildings on land
already developed or platted.
e . Any combination of the above
II . Defined Areas:
a. Th ntire City
b. tiZ of Holmes and north of the proposed by-pass
C. Range 22 , Sections 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9, 10 , 15 ,
16, 17 , and 18 .
ft
Related Issue:
Should the Council initiate the moratorium, a comprehensive
study should begin immediately and hopefully be concluded in
ninety days . It may be appropriate to involve an outside planning
consultant to assist in the planning or apply condition no. 2 of
the Racetrack Conditional Use Permit which states that the appli-
cant participate and assist the City in developing detailed land
use plans for the area in and around the racetrack properties once
final development begins .
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the Council consider establishing a
development moratorium which would curtail the issuance of rezoning
amendments, conditional uses, variances and building permits within
an area described as Range 22, Sections 3 , 4 , 5, 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10, 15 ,
16 , 17 and 18 , for a period of ninety days . Further, Council should
consider a comprehensive plan for said area which would be prepared
by planning professionals, other than staff.
Action Requested:
Move to consider on April 17 , 1984 a proposed moratorium
ordinance which will limit development applications for a period
of ninety days in order for the City to consider its present land
use legislation.
Attachment
Draft
"Proposed Ordinance Subject To Legal Review"
A Moratorium ordinance to protect the development of the
City of Shakopee during the consideration of the present land
use legislation and preparation of amendments to the Compre-
hensive Plan and Zoning Chapter of the City Code, which regulates
the use of land, location, bulk, height and use of buildings on
lots and providing for the administration and enforcement of such
regulations .
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee is engaged in the consideration
of its present land use legislation, and
WHEREAS, the moratorium is necessary to protect the city from
any building construction or new uses of land that may do irrepar-
able harm to the character to existing neighborhoods and defeat
the purposes of the comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance; and
WHEREAS, said moratorium shall apply to rezoninq, conditional
use, variance, and building permit (excepting necessary permits
for repairs and alterations or for buildings on land already
developed or platted) applications in an area defined as Range 22 ,
Sections 3 , 4 , 5, 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 15 , 16 , 17 and 18 for a period
of ninety days , effective upon passage and publication of ordinance.
Adopted in session of the City Council of
the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
19
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
MEMORANDUM
TO: John n Anderson/Cit Administrator
or
FROM: H.R. Spurrier/City Engineer
RE: Sixth Avenue Sanitary Sewer Study
DATE: April 10 , 1984 1
Introduction:
City Council ordered a study of the Sixth Avenue Sanitary Sewer
March 6 , 1984.
Background:
The Engineering Department can undertake this study for approximate-
ly $3 , 500 .00. This means approximately 100 man hours of study
time. The work would not interfere with any of the present projects
nor would it interfere with the schedule of Shakopee Racetrack
Improvements .
Action Requested:
i
Authorize City Staff to undertake a study of the Sixth Avenue
Sanitary Sewer for approximately $3 , 500 . 00 paid out of the f
Sewer Fund.
i
HRS : cah
I
I
City of Shakopee
POLICE DEPARTMENT
476 South Gorman Street
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379
Tel. 445.6666
TO: Mayor, Council Members
FROM: Tom Brownell, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Vehicle Propane Equipment Purchase
DATE: April 11, 1984
INTRODUCTION
The department budgeted $5600 . 00 to install propane units in the
four patrol vehicles purchased in 1984 .
BACKGROUND
Propane fueled vehicles have proven to be cost effective during
the past five years. Fuel costs have averaged about .67G per
gallon including a . 17G tax and we have not had major engine
problems for 120,000 miles per unit.
QUOTATIONS
Propane Carb & Turbo, Shakopee $1177.80 each $4711 . 20
Northern Propane, Eagan, MN. $1425. 00 each $5700 . 00
Gas Supply Company, St. Louis Park $1225.00 each $4900 . 00
RECOMMENDATIONS
Purchase four propane units to include installation from
Propane Carb & Turbo Co. , at a cost of $4711 . 20.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Authorize the purchase of four propane units to include
installation from Propane Carb & Turbo Company at a cost
of $4711 . 20 .
go z&vz e- �:7O i roLEct
r
µ
the Housing Alliance
200 BUTLER NORTH o 510IST AUE. N.
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55403
(612)339-6122
CO
(TS (1)
W U O
U— U •N N0 'a N
ccS = _
v
CO :a ca b
W ° o
Z
O - Cl) V)
'cn E �
° c a a°)i �
7 Z
O a ccs
O +� o m
o -� N 4 o
:DC O L r-
L �
O O ° Co
CO = U
cu m
F— m v� � � b
cri
Zm rn a �
O O LL a) CLn t �
U
CL �
O
o
WL-
CO
Lc i C) cn u
< Q a) b
°o oC
U �'
p ° m
W �E V)
W0) ,�
Z n
�n.49
CC
_ °' '49
� b
_1 70- `" o
W � �
0
z
Vl ` A
O a) ccs
U 0_ J
Non Section For
Profit g Sale Rental
Subsidized Market
Rental Rate
Independent
Seniors
Empty Elderly
Nester Frail
Step-Up COMMUNITY Nursing
Buyer PROGRAM Home
First-Time Hospice
Buyer ' Hospital
Apartment
Rental
MARKET ENTRY LEVEL
Housing Cycle
Balanced Need Within each Community
Roll-over Housing
As People Move Up, Housing Becomes Available at Starter Level
�177
HOUSING� � � UBLIC
❑ tl 'oil C', Q D f11` J-�, ir'�
Flrsl Avenue � —
El
�.
Y
SecoM Avenue ,
{I ❑ d❑ o p a Ll ❑ it p 0
CJ
HOW NG I I I
❑ ❑G o G' o cin . L' ]
Third A—
QoQa o C7 6 OLJ® d llo CILI via D
II ITUI ° s
❑' u4 n Ct r j
1-1 q u r, Ll E_
Fo-h A�.❑nvep u `LSI LJ ❑ ❑E3 ❑ L!. -' ....:.� 1.�
❑❑ ❑i �dm ❑ - ❑f7Q � I C7CG
El
LE O
D ❑G ❑G
Filth Avenue
C7 r (m
�ODo p< orJ t] �`UEID p❑ > I -
_—_- -
DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION PLAN
N i
- �
RIVERSIDE PARK / . Iif-
to
Lp m
+ PARK BBLDB
m I
R I V E R DRIVE 3 P P T
i Y
l't EEyEE•�• `
• V
S q
VE D P P
Y ,
1: — • � .0 -10 N
4
u"'" • 4 � 111t
••~S•~••SI p y a
5h
gT.YS
VE
�
I M Y
CENTRAL MHURGH♦ R
PROPERTY LOCATIONS
10c,
' -
t
ROVT � ... �
'
100
i
GvkocE
}
..........
1
V
t i
V tt }
i
t rt t
v
t
M� PON, t
�fl �Kwf:P � �f... �,;^kh}ki^1...•tN'i."i^.,
>n_
tilt-'i§ r i
`:. +r ,ed': ..}''Fi.}dk{a}>•btl'Yii§il{t'+}.t}+'}'i i �"— i >
SECOND
FIE STA 1
* _ 3
-
__'_ -_- }
_.
THIRD AVE
i
P r
i
uV
--
---------------------
--
.. f
—
y �.
t h'�
t
I
...........-..................................................................................................................._.......................... —4,
... 4, ---
` N
SITE A
WAMPACH PROPERTY
t ' e
IN
(file
s \+.
4 n Ct
SENA t,, °�'•rttc�
t4jM l
,
i
l
DG t �
,
----- .`ataF".w 1 + ".....^.'"" Lakt#Yt`tiNy
.
1 ! .... .4ti441t{-t{.iy.µtH ti ttSt'b'� 4tA�tt'tM}t4ttt4 ��.H't4Ar�
,.... ,i.S.H ft}ii't�•:t t44_{.,}.4. t � A,iiYt1K
z
1 .. . kf!.aArf
Ptr 'tttt'A4irttrit}41itt tiLi i?f*1 ftp .•t'rkt}ttttitij ... 1'k-'AA
r--
........................._............
� t
, �........�....-._�.....-...._......-��ttto't awl ,. ..�
i
`t. IO
IF S'T p' a tt
_..._....__. _..._ _.._.. _...__..._...._....._...._... _ ..._ .. ..._......_..._...._...._..__... _ .. _ ._ .. _.._._
N
SITE B
LEVEE DRIVE PROPERTY
2
�,�i2x�. d � A •
A
ti
s •
P,ok
AMR
a
a GR
v
:
t �
,
t •mss -- �P ��
Will
kk
i kt =k=ik.l t,d=i= =ty�4
:
, k •
,
r
t
a E
SITE C
DUNLOP PROPERTY
4 e.
f ,
c Ilk
q�3
� s
��; l� • � '+-� {IvyLiii I
x
cw a#
/rY
h
111 I
;� IU
e gn�x�y aa-zz� �
V
Q
1
1
d
c=
'Viitl
r.. i
I g;*
Pi
1J �ry
ACTIVE INDEPENDENT
CLUSTER HOMES
F: „y
��4,r K x. Y 3'Y�•�,�E '.x,� 5,.��T,„� 1},a^•� c'4� -gt,. �A ",��3r,�� - a :. .,r x�� �i�� �`�'�"sg���,?
oyIv,
tf T3 '�l ��t iif vl/
� r
fi 11
si
a
t s rye. +++���•••��� C," ..
T—�N Ax
t. �'t ..j '4S.yc, a J. "'� Y..v` �' �.II4'r.. �* I .➢Y:
11 FTTRTIL4R lMMI'hr.�'
F1 11
�n .x' L
r� i
Y� `
r
3
Y�
� i�
til IIIIIIIIIII
INDEPENDANT; CONGREGATE
LOW to MID RISE
1 �
47
ov c vvvuvvv j
-LLV ,r ago $ o ,� 4
m now
1
r
\lll
L.R. I L.R.
L.R. /BR.
K. I ❑ K
B R.
B R.
K. ❑ 0 ��
I�
INDEPENDENT CONGREGATE
LOW to MID RISE
Al .."'.
'A
irk,•' '�s`,�:
r
a•.x r
It .f
ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT PRIVACY CONTROL The INDEPENDENCE Re.gabloto INSIDE OUT SnacklattNm DISPLAY Reudenlsw•d
Having is Mrvate f.41 for bedl—ptwacy eh.design prepare..ah snacks and meals kitchen.dutch dogs,and Put I,nmlure and M,ntn.gs
themsalvss wra.1.1.that olds PIOr,dea will1110 residents will help residents ma.ta n a Inlet rot window wih If.. On lh., to I po,ches
residents feel IM.n.,pnment to open'thek,lchenatlewithout sense.(..dependence nudents'.'..I Pan of to exp.ss who theya•e
$.Pmts them. I-I.Ig III al ease house Ida while ymumng
gal.In their"home
I �
_04 JI
781
4,811Lou
, tilt_J r G b _ p
I ,
IN 111
----ra,
ID
I r f ll If i Iii
SHARING Residents will accept PREVIEWING Residenlswill
uSOCIAL ESCAPE Residents will
aM de-oof sharing bathtub down below from elevator feel more Comfortable usi
in exchange lot congregate landings to Prepare themselves back slurs to get to La nd 1,
amenities. bailer for soviet encounters. and TV room,when in a dressing
SECOND FLOOR
gown.
UNOBSTRUSIVE CARE HEALTH Residents will PREVIEWING Residents will SOCIAL EXCUSE Residents SOCIAL MIX Two-person units
Residents will not feel they frequently use main stairs use the midway stair landing will wait for the elevator as an with bath will attract more
are in a facility in which neer entry end it will be to decide if they want to excuse 10 be part of the activity active residents and couples.
othersare caringfor them heap by for them, loin activity below. in the central hallway
because the office is small and
Wt Of the way.
It J,
is
L .r
[l,
E A
r
J_1
� � ❑.1 rs
' ----- _-asHip
i; R ;
ri L"A
Its
is
DROP-OFF WAITING An -. _.. \
.overlook of the cat
drOP-Off from inside.will
help residents feel al ease
waiting in-doors to he \ \
picked up.
PROXIMITY Because the entry HOMEYNESS Having an IDENTITY Thehouse"front SUPPORT One hot meal a day SHARED BACKSTAGE
is visible nearly from Main eat'in kitchen for group porch"will be central to in a common dining room will Residenlswill use the Irving
Street,residents walking coffee will be an integral residents'image of the enable residents to be rode- rooms of the old house
homewill not fell it is a part of residents seeing the building and wilt be used pendent the reslof the time exlremelyinformatly like
long walkwhole house as"home" to describe It to others. with minimal help. their own apartment to
wait fol tauhdry to d,y
and to watch TV
FIRST FLOOR Nr I- i -- 20i6m
SEMI - INDEPENDANT
(NON MEDICIAL)
„
,7
r
OPEN MARKET
`• III '"i � �.
TRAIN
LA
�. 1�� it � ��� Y � •+• 1 , � ti 4+'.� ��'��
RIVER / TRAILS
ROCK SPRINGS / STONE WAJ
I D E A S
SPIRITUAL
T,
5♦5sj
I` A i
HEALTH SERVICES /� ORGANIZATIONS
yy
�► SPONSOR -' •� � . r;.;
(LEADERSHIP) ~
.00AL GOVERNMENT INDIVIDUALS
C O M M U N I T Y