Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/19/1984 MEMO TO: Mayor and Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Admin. RE : Non-Agenda Informational Items DATE : March 15, 1984 1 • The Scott County Board has appointed James Laabs , 19700 Xeon Ave . , Jordan, MN to the Prior Lake/Spring Lake Water- shed District . As I noted in an earlier informational item to Council , none of the names we had selected were available for appointment . 2 . We have received the first quarterly report on our new Employee Assistance Program. There were no requests for service from Shakopee employees during the first three months of 1984. We will continue to promote the availability of this service to City employees and their families . 3 . David P. Brotzler, as noted in the Shakopee Valley News , has sent us a letter of intent to sue for $50,000,000. This letter has been forwarded to the Insurance Company and our City Attorney as per normal procedure . If you have any questions I suggest you contact Tom Brownell . , 4. Attached are the minutes of a meeting of all the representatives of all Shakopee teams and/or leagues using baseball fields . Please note that there is the possibility of moving the baseball field lights from Riverside Park to Tahpah Park at no cost to the City. This would be a fantastic improvement for the community. If you have any questions or can help George in providing support , please contact him. 5. Attached is a "thank you" letter from a resident to Earl Fleck commending him for his help. 6. Attached is a letter from Senator Rudy Boschwitz regarding the AT&T break-up. 7 . Attached is a letter from Representative Chuck Dimler regarding his activities on the Legislative Commission on Metropolitan Transit . 8 . Attached is the final tabulation for fuel dispersements for the City for 1984. If you have any questions , please contact Jim Karkanen. 9. Attached is the Building Activity Report for the month ending February 29, 1984. 10. Attached are the minutes of the January 19, 1984 Energy and Transportation Committee Meeting. 11 . Attached are the minutes of the February 29 , 1984 Downtown Ad Hoc Committee Meeting . Non-Agenda Informational Items Page 2 March 15 , 1984 12 . Attached are the minutes of the March 5 , 1984 SPUC Meeting. 13 . Attached is a memo from Bo Spurrier regarding changes in the cost of T.H. 101 Frontage Rd. improvements . The project will exceed Engineering' s estimate by $7 ,000. 00 ( Suburban Engineering charges ) . Other items may be under estimate , but we ' ll keep you informed. 14. Attached is Revenue Report as of 2/29/84. 15. The City Staff has reviewed a revised version of the old preliminary and final plat (not reworked ) for Hauer 2nd addition, now referred to Hauer 3rd . The new preliminary plat deals with four critical planning issues : 13th Avenue Alignment , By-Pass R-O-W, a major gas line and accessing all lots created with sanitary sewer. Because of these four issues , Staff is asking Mr . Hauer to sketch plan everything lying between the By-pass R-O-W and Hauer lst addition since he owns all of the land in question except on 5 acres parcel inthe middle . Staff estimates this would take 8 to 12 hours Planner or Engineering time . While this request is new in scope , Staff feels it is a must if we are to avoid screwing up development in the area in question through piece-meal platting of small parcels . 16 . The letter nominating Bill Koniarski for Regional Citizen of the Year was sent out Wednesday, March 15 , 1984 with two letters of support as per Council direction. JKA/bn - y ,..�4ttkvprc TommuuitU *eruires 129 Levee Drive Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone 445-2742 Community Education • Parks • Recreation • Adult Education George F. Muenchow, Dir. March 12, 1984 John Anderson: The attached minutes taken from a meeting Wednesday evening is for your information alerting you to a movement on foot to finance the moving of the light towers from Riverside Park to the Tahpah Park Baseball Field. I shall keep on top of the situation. C.C. : Jim Karkanen Lona Van Ho ut Eldon Reinke �'� LeRoy Hauser Bo Spurrier rF. Muenchow A COOPERATIVE EFFORT OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE AND SCHOOL DISTRICT 720 SINCE 1954 MEETING OF REPRESENTATIVES OF ALL SHAKOPEE TEAMS AND/OR LEAGUES USING 90' BASEBALL FIELDS Shakopee C.S. Office — 3/7/84 The meeting was called to order by George Muenchow at 7:05 PM. Present: Bob Techam (Babe Ruth Baseball) , Harold Bigot (Babe Ruth Baseball including Mickey Mantle Team) , Ron Thielen (Legion Team), Joe Schleper (Indian Baseball Team & High School Teams) , Bill Schleper (Indian Baseball Team) ,Don Bisek (Over 35 Team A) , and Bob Ganz (Over 35 Team B) , George Muenchow. Major discussion throughout the evening related to the idea of moving the light towers from Riverside Park to Tahpah Park Baseball Field. Joe Schleper reported that an individual has volunteered to move and install the towers free of charge. A quote of approximately $12,000.00 has been received for light fixtures not including wiring. Dugouts would cost approximately $1500.00. Support was acknowledged by all present who will go back to their respective groups to deter— mine amount of backing by their respective groups. The next meeting date will be Wednesday, March 28, at the C.S. Office. A plan of action will be presented by Joe Schleper including as much detail as possible. Fund raising ideas will be shared. George Muenchow will research city and utilities requiremnets. The group recognized that everything now is preliminary. Before this project could fly there would have to be a master plan approved by the City Council. The group was reminded that each team provides the C.S. Office with their season' s schedule (games and practice). Thereafter before rainouts or exhibitions are added they are to check with the C.S. Office to verify the availability of the field. Priority of scheduling is as follows: A. Spring. . . . . . . .High School Teams B. Summer. . . . . . . .Indians Legion Babe Ruth Mickey Mantle Over 35 "A" Over 35 "B" Babe Ruth Teams normally play on Monday and Thursday evenings and Saturday mornings. Mickey Mantle Team plays on Tuesday, Friday, and Sundays. Legion team plays on Mondays and Wednesdays. Indians usually play on Sundays and Thursdays. Over 35 teams usually play on Sundays. Park personnel were requested to uncover base pegs when dragging fields. Meeting adjourned at 8:30. Next meeting on Wednesday, March 28, at 7:00 PM at C.S. Office. �f� _ ��) G orr �� Muenchow 923 Shumway Shakopee , kinnesota 55379 Iyiarch 1 1 , 1984 1dr. Earl Fleck Juvenile Officer City of Shakopee 476 Gorman Shakopee , Iuiinnesota 55379 Dear Earl: All to often we fail to recognize or appreciate the services that are available to us as residents of the City of Shakopee . I would like to take this opportunity, Earl, to express my sincere thanks and appreciation for all your efforts during a recent family crisis. I wish to acknowledge the sincere concern, interest and help which you extended to me and my family. I believe that we as residents of the City of Shakopee are very fortunate to have a juvenile officer on our police department who has not only the professional training, but also a sincere interest in his job along with a very definite ability to do it well. Although I am very sorry for the experience that I did have to encounter, I am very grateful for the opportunity to come to appreciate you and your professionalism. Thanks, Earl, for all your efforts. Sincerely, r Judith S. Cox A Shakopee Resident CC: Tom Brownell, Chief of Police John Anderson, City Administrator kembers of the Shakopee City Council VAR 12 1984 CITY RUDY BGSCHWITZ COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS: MINNESOTA AGRICULTURE BUDGET FOREIGN RELATIONS SMALL BUSINESS VETERANS AFFAIRS o C rf eb .cif of ez Zenctf e WASHINGTON. D.C. 20510 February 28 , 1984 Mr . John Anderson City Administrator 129 E. First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear John: Certainly we have all heard the wise advice, " if it ain' t broke , don ' t fix. it . " If only those who sought to break up AT&T had listened. Well , as you know, the Senate has now decided not to consider legislation dealing with the controversial new "access charges. " With a 44-40 vote on January 26, it tabled an attempt to consider S. 1660 -- the bill that would have put a two-year moratorium on consumer and small business access charges. This action means that now the Federal Communications Commission must decide if , how much, and when phone users will pay the new access fee to their local phone company. The major reason leading to this action was the FCC' s decision on January 25 to postpone new access fees for consumers until at least mid-1985. Just prior to its decision , Senator Durenberger and I contacted FCC Chairman Mark Fowler , asking that no access charges be imposed during 1984 . We felt that because of the uncertainties about rate increases created by the AT&T divestiture, the FCC should delay the fees for at least a year . A minimum of a one year delay would give the FCC time to determine whether or not access charges actually prevent universal service considering all the other changes taking place in the industry. Both Senator Durenberger and I believe that it Will be months before the full impact of the divestiture on rates and universal service can be determined. Therefore , delaying the implementation of the charges seems to be the most reasonable action . I still believe that the efforts to break up AT&T were wrong. As I am a strong advocate of the free enterprise system, I don ' t believe that this regulated monopoly, which grew into the world' s greatest communication system, needed to be split up. But , unfortunately, split up it is and the damage is done. The question we faced in the Senate was whether or not to proceed on legislation that would prevent the imposition of access charges. Deciding this matter came down to a philosophical difference of opinion . As you know, our country has had a long standing policy of charging more for long distance calls than they really cost . The resulting proceeds were allocated to local phone companies to February 28 , 1984 Page 2 help pay for undercharged local service . This policy was followed to ensure that universal phone service was affordably available for all citizens. However , to coincide with the divestiture , the FCC wanted to change this policy . Through its access fee the FCC sought to reduce long distance rates to help achieve cost-based pricing. Over time , the FCC intended to gradually shift long distance costs to the local consumer to make up the difference in total revenue that before had been recovered through long distance rates . I had some deep concerns about the effects of this approach. I continue to believe that it is important to keep local phone rates affordable so that consumers , particularly senior citizens and rural users , do not face phone bills so high as to force them to give up their phones . For that reason, I cosponsored and supported Senate bill 1660 as a vehicle for addressing these problems. The intentions of the FCC are clear . They want to shift charges from long distance users -- primarily generated by the major corporations -- into the hands of the local consumer . This is too costly a shift for most Minnesotans. Studies have indicated that the adoption of the FCC plan rather than S . 1660 would cost Minnesotans $20 million . Although the forum for consideration of this issue has now shifted from the Senate back to the FCC, I still maintain my interest . Be assured that should this matter receive further attention here in the Senate , I will have your thoughts in mind. Thanks for taking the time to ontact me . in rely, udy Boschwitz nited States Senator RB/mc Minnesota Chuck Dimler House of District 36A Carver-Scott Counties Committees: Representatives Agriculture Regulated Industries Harry A.Sieben,Jr.,Speaker Transportation February 28, 1984 CIS'' OF S AK PEE Mayor Eldon Reinke Shakopee City Offices 129 East 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mayor, Council and Staff: Enclosed is the final report of the Legislative Commission on Metropolitan Transit. This is the Commission on which I serve and many of your concerns were addressed at our meetings, I want to thank you for the input given this Commission. Excellent testimony was given publicly and privately and was most helpful . A draft bill is now at the revisor's office. It is the hope of the Commission and myself that this bill will passin the 1984 session. Again, thank you and please continue to call or send any infor- mation or questions you may have to my office . Sincerely, , // t1 N Chuck Dimler State Representative CD:mm Reply to: ❑ 388 State Office Building,St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Office: (612)296-1072 C3 7203 Kiowa Circle,Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Home: (612)934-8974 NOT PRINTED AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE 00 O LOC:) LO rn LO i N I Lo ,I 00 1 1;', 1-, i I --3- i I I r-i N A' Q1 00 N1 LO (7) --T N r-{ --J- U1 r-, cn cn LO O' LO N • r-� 00 N 1� . M r--.. I N CT) 00 1 t\ 1 �G4 1 00 Ul O r-i �'• I I\ CT Cv Ul M. 1 M r-i •--i r-i .�" O r-I Ln Ul O N r-i O Q1 ; � U) CT) O N CV Ul LO cn O UN O M O0 tom. A- --3 00 LO C::). h .N 00 Nl t\ LO �' LO O r-1 r-i. M p-, CT --I' M i Ul O. t\ r-i I C Y) Lr). 00 00 M' 00 00, M -:I- Z-1- -:3- r-i r-i N r-i N1 r-i . �" r•-1 O r-i cn 00 �' --I` r-i r-1 r^i N r-1 00 CT NO t\ LO M M r-i 00 O: -:3- O N CV 00 LO 00 r-- r--. O N-) N Z r-1 O 00 N M m CN. \t .7-1- LO LO N a) Ln : 00 r-1 00 O O UM O I: 1 00 W J O7 00 00 00 N " Ul LO Ma) 'U N 00 —1 CT O cn M N Ul M r-I LLJ Jr i Nl r- LO M U% -:I'• m r-•I r-•1 N 00 M -Z:' � Q r^i N r-i O L7 LL- Cn O F- ?- W F- .- W U Ul 00 O N �". --1- ;-00 N N --r O \ U1 --iM < -i Ul m 00 U"% CT 00 CS N O --I' N Ul r--i. zl" LO : 1 LO r-i M N r-i O O �' U1 O N M r-i r"I M. r--i M -&) • t\ . N Ni:--i N N •r-{ r--1 O N r-i O U) ---r C.'.5 O O -I- LO M r-i a) ►-I r-i r--I N r-i r-i Ul I-I (D0 Ul �..a r-i r-i N r-1 r-•i Q W O N) LO LO a) N N •-Z' LO. LO -1 1l. M Ul M LO N re M U1 U1 (b r I Nl m N CT) I� I-.. I CT 00 O . 00 O O M LO Nl Lo LO O N CT N Cn r-i �" M r-I _ O O --j-• r-i LO' N m -3' O Nl LO 00 N r-I r-i N O 00 --:3' 00 A" r--1 00 N r--i r--i r--i r--i r-{ N m O U1 w w w w w w w w w w :w. w w A . A :z J Q `Q w Q w Q W < Q• W Q. Q Q w.. w Q' w Q 'Q W w CL A W w CL A W CL `4' A 'W' W W A'; N W w A ; w CL N J O Q J w O i Q J O Q •.-J. '._! J Q.,w .' J J Q J O w z �, w z - = w z_ a ' . w z z z w z z• w z t� O CL J O A CL J O CL J O > > J A = _ J ._ 'Cl. A Cy_ U W W W J U �� _ � , 0-1 Cl-I Cl- LO 0 OCD 6-4 Q O a. :,n Cn LsJ W U- L-) d F— CITY O S11AK01'EP" liU J 1.1)1 Ni: ACTIVITY ltlsl'U11T FEBRUARY, 1984 PERMITS ISSUED Yr. to Date Total Pruv.ious Year N111111)L'r Number V;► 1 wi t, i Oar, Number Valuation MO . YTD . 6198 - 6213 Single 1�am.-svwered 3 5 304,500 - 1 40 ,000 n),le t••am. -Septic 1 1 68 ,000 -Multiple Droll ings - - - 1 1 70 ,000 (ldc .liniis) ( 1"1'D Unit::) - - - ( 2 ) ( 2 ) - Dwel I ing Additions 1 2 61 ,100 1 1 23 ,500 0het - - - 2 23 ,000 B sinoti,:s District - - - -_ A)�r•icul tur;tl - - nt:ustri;ii -Scptic - - - 1, , :::• � �', ;:►� ;►�,� :, 1 7 ,000 - - - ; 1 )�n•,•i, i ,,,•,•: ,",.s & Felice-, 2 2 2 ,800 1 4 10 , 700 : , ,��,,,I :; 1 ,,�•�• 2 3 12 ,700 - 3 11 ,525 ! _ 1 2 65 ,000 nP/voimdAtion - iN'cmodeI in)" (Res. ) 2 9 62 ,800 3 4 85950 Remodel ing ( lust . ) 5 7 2235999 - 2 13 ,055 1comodel ing (other) 16 30 742 ,899 8 21 265 , 730 UTI NAL i,RArJ1� `ri)�'nt. 16 30 742 ,899 8 21 2655730 MO YTD. 1•10 . 1 1 2 2 k-)t: i n); i t ri 22 38 5 13 t ,:,t )•,. fit.p . 15 27 12 19 It,►:: i n); Fo l..mi is Re'idential - - ; ., i nt., I lin); unit:, in City after• complctiun cel' ;, I l cun:;t.r1w1"ioi, jw-vni. tLed ditt.( . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 ,669 Cora Hullander Bldg/Eng Dept. Sec. CITY OF SHAKOPEE BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IN FEBRUARY, 1984 6198 Lawrence Signs 234 W. 1st Sign $ 2 ,300 6199 S.M. Hentges 1503 W. 3rd Raze 1 , 500 6200 S.M. Hentges 2461 Hauer Trail Fireplace 700 6201 Mid America Plastics 650 Industrial Cir. Alt . 4,200 6202 Peter Sames 812 Holmes Addn. 1 ,100 6203 DuWayne Traut 685 Monroe Alt . 7 ,400 6204 Cedar Fair One Valley Fair Dr . Addn. 25 ,000 6205 V.F.W. 132 E. 1st Ave. Alt . 300 6206 Cedar Fair One Valley Fair Dr. Addn. 10 ,000 6207 Michael Menke � , 630 enke Ave .-- House 76 , 500 6208 Laurent Bldrs . 1214 Tyler St . Mouse 52 ,000 � F - yr 6209 George Strehlow 603 E�. 1st Z . Fence 500 6210 Stikbilt Const . 1762 Co. Rd. 89 House 685000 6211 Elmer Theis 1254 Harrison St . Alt . 6 ,000 6212 Jasper Homes 1275 Tyler St . House 65 ,000 6213 Michael Menke 657 Menke Ave ti� �jj Fireplace 9 ,500 $330 ,000 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATIONCOMMITTEE REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 19,- 1984 Chrm. Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:41 p.m. with members Dunwell and Schwingler present. Member Sorenson was absent. Also present were Judi Simac, City Planner and Cncl. Colligan. Schwingler/Dunwell moved to approve the minutes of December 15, 1984 as kept. Motion carried unanimously. A review was undertaken of the budget line items in the application for Opt Out. Discussion was held on various items, with the figures being checked and brief explanations given by the Planner. Line item 1185 from the first draft was missing in the application. The City Planner will add that item of Labor for $10,000. The City Planner will check on line item 1955, where the figures don't add up. It should either be 6,296 or 150 hrs. per vehicle. Consensus was the rest of the application was fine. The City Planner reported on the City's presentation at the Legislative Task Force on Metropolitan Transit. She said she made the presentation of the City's preferred model alternative structure for transit. She said the only comment had to do with the size of the Board. She suggested there be only one repre- sentative if the City was in a Joint Powers Agreement with Chaska and/or Prior Lake. Or if the City had its own transit service , a Councilperson might be the best representative. She said Peter Stumpf, of MTC, advised that the planning and operations be separate. She said there is another public hearing on Wednesday, which she will attend to again present Shakopee 's position. Discussion followed. The City Planner said the City's application was submitted December 27, 1983, which would mean February 11, 1984 would be the deadline when a decision would be expected. Chrm. Anderson mentioned that September would be a good launch time for the City's new transit service. The City Planner informed the members that Glenda Spiotta was appointed by Council to the Energy and Transportation Committee. She said there are more openings, and members should be recruiting. Chrm. Anderson mentioned a couple of names that she could call. Schwingler/Dunwell moved to adjourn at 9:13 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Judi Simac City Planner Diane S. Be uch Recording Secie tary PROCEEDINGS OF THE DOWNTOWN AD HOC COMMITTEE SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA February 29, 1984 Chrm. Laurent called the meeting to order at 7 : 39 A.M. with the following voting members present: Steve Clay, Jerry Wampach, Bill Wermerskirchen Jr. , Dan Steil, Don Martin and Jim Stillman. Non-voting members present: Paul Wermerskirchen, Trevor Walsten and Al Furrie. Absent: Terry Link, Mike Sortum, Joe Topic, Terry Klinger, Lee Stoltzman and Frank Reid. Also present: Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director, Dick Krier and Jack Lynch of Westwood Planning and Engineering, Bo Spurrier, City Engineer and John Anderson, City Administrator. Stillman/Steil moved to approve the minutes of January 18 , 1984 , as presented. Motion carried. Chrm. Laurent introduced Al Furrie, the new liaison from the Industrial Commercial Commission. Chrm. Laurent then turned the meeting over to Jerry Wampach who distributed resolution #2218 from the City Council thanking members of the Downtown Ad Hoc Committee for their time and efforts developing the Comprehensive Downtown Revitalization Plan. Chrm. Laurent then read a letter from Nancy Christiansen stating she was regretfully submitting her resignation, due to her other conflicts with the Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce. Chrm. Laurent informed the committee that Dan Steil, Jeanne Andre and himself, had presented the Downtown Concept Plan to the Shakopee Utility Commission and they seemed very supportive and willing to work with the plan. Jeanne Andre added that plans were also sent to Minnegasco and Northwestern Bell for their information. And that Minnegasco had already sent theirs back with all the lines marked in the downtown area, which will be helpful in planning. Also, other accomplishments to bring attention to the Downtown Committee in the last few weeks, was a radio interview on KSMM by Dan Steil, and a presentation to the Chamber of Commerce by Chairman Laurent . Chrm. Laurent also stated he had met with a lady representing the new owners of the Opera House, who had some interesting ideas for uses of the upper level of the building, eg. leasing to groups as a community room or craft fair room. There was a short discussion held regarding some concern about the railroad tracks in Shakopee. f( Chrm. Laurent informed the members that some people from the Historical Society expressed interest in the Maurice Stans home. They would like to see it used as a museum or Chamber of Commerce office. Dan Steil said he would contact the Chamber and make them aware of the office space available. Chrm. Laurent then turned the meeting over to Consultant Krier, who reviewed the Redevelopment Plan and Program. Out- lining the main goals and objectives to be accomplished during the next few years by government incentives and private actions . These included: 1) Economic development, 2 ) financing and feasi- bility, 3 ) transportation and parking, 4 ) land use and 5 ) physical appearance. Jack Lynch then outlined the refinement of selected plans and implementation tools . These included: land use, transportation/ parking and environment, under the redevelopment plan. Imple- mentation tools including: 1) design elements , 2 ) lighting, 3 ) plant material, 4 ) building exterior treatments , 5 ) sign treatment and 6 ) pedestrian amenities . Consultant Krier indicated that there are five things that they had learned from successful shopping centers and redevelopers . These being: 1 ) a sense of arrival, 2 ) building design, 3 ) material used 4 ) texture and vegetation and 5 ) signs . Bill Wermerskirchen left at 8 : 45 A.M. Consultant Krier also discussed land use provisions and require- ments , acquisition plans , redevelopers ' obligations , relocation plan, rehabilitation plan and the economic development program. Consultant Krier recommended a four point program for the Down- town and City (HRA) to follow which is designed to maximize the inherent strength of the downtown and duplicate the stregths of the shopping center. This program includes: 1 ) An Over-all Plan and Public Improvements, 2 ) Mandatory Design, 3 ) Financing and 4 ) Management , including establishing a Downtown Local Development Corporation. Consultant Krier then discussed costs of the plan as outlined in the draft "Public Costs and Financing" circulated to members in their packets. Acquisition costs were identified as those for the right-of-way and reduced to $1, 017 , 000 . Additonal costs identified by Mr. Krier (not in the packet) , include $310, 000 for relocation, $21 , 000 for demolition, $356 , 000 for administration, engineering, legaland planning services; and a contingency of $747 , 000 . He stated this leads to total public costs for public improvements of $8 , 225 , 000 to implement the concept plan in the area bounded by 1st and 3rd Avenues , Atwood and Sommerville. (Note: the actual total public expenditures is $8 , 216, 000 ) l� Consultant Krier went on to outline that development of housing identified in the market study would also be likely to require public subsidies as follows : Housing Assistance $368, 000 ; Relocation $96 , 000; Demolition $15, 000 ; Administration, Engi- neering, Legal and Planning $48 ,000 ; Contingency $53, 000 ; for a total of $580, 000 . He also suggested that the City provide $2 , 000 , 000 for rehabilitation loans and $30, 000 for related legal and administrative fees to initiate an estimated $8 million in rehabilitation which is needed. The three elements of 1) public improvements, 2 ) housing and 3 ) rehabilitation would have a total public investment cost of $10 , 835, 000 .* Consultant Krier went on to recommend revenue sources to fund these projects as follows : Tax Increment $7 million; Block Grant (State) $750 , 000 ; Economic Development Grant ( State ) $200 , 000 ; Mn. Dept of Transportation (roadway) $910 , 000 ; Utilities Improvements (electrical and railroad ) $600 , 000 ; Investment Interest Income ( 5o interest to be charged on rehabilitation loans ) $500, 000 ; and Special Assessments $875 , 000. He explained that his recommended financial plan calls for downtown property owners to pay 8G of each public dollar invested in the plan through special assessments (or ll� of each public dollar spent on public improvements ) . He went on to state that the $10 . 8 million public expenditure should generate approximately $28 million in private investments . (See attached Summary of "Preliminary Public Costs and Revenues" ) Dan Steil asked what the next step would be? Dick Krier suggested one more meeting to come to a consensus in terms of the information received at this meeting. The next phase would be to have a threshold analysis done by an outside firm. John Anderson, City Administrator, presented plans of the Jaycees for building a new State Office. Discussion regarding location of the new commercial office space on the preferred site was supported by the group. They felt that this type of office use best fit the fringe of the area identified for major retail activities . Martin/Steil moved that the Committee supported the preferred site (NW corner of 3rd and Sommerville) as a location for a State Jaycees Office that would compliment the downtown redevel- opment efforts with the understanding that the Committee would have the opportunity to review and approve the proposed plans to assure compliance with downtown design standards now under con- sideration. Motion carried unanimously. Stiel/Stillman moved to adjourn at 9 : 46 A.M. Motion carried. Toni Warhol Recording Secretary The next meeting will be March 14 , 1984 . * This figure is corrected to read $10, 826 , 000 in attachment. PRELIMINARY PUBLIC COSTS AND REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN COSTS Public Costs for Proposed Public Improvement Construction By Pass $ 1 , 610 , 000 Shop Improvements 3 , 230, 000 Parking Lot Improvement 275 , 000 Underground Utilities 500, 000 River Front Improvement 150, 000 R-O-W Acquisition 1 , 017 , 000 R-O-W Relocation 310 , 000 R-O-W Demolition 21 , 000 Admin , Eng. Legal , Plan. 356 ,000 Contingency 747 , 000 Public Improvement Total $ 8 , 216 , 000 Public Costs for Housing Development Housing Assistance $ 368 , 000 Relocation 96 , 000 Demolition 15 , 000 Admin , Eng. Legal , Plan. 48 , 000 Contingency 53 , 000 Housing Total $ 580, 000 Public Costs for Rehabilitation Program Rehabilition Loans $ 2 , 000, 000 Admin , Legal 30 , 000 Rehabilitation Total $ 2 , 030, 000 TOTAL COSTS $10, 826 , 000 REVENUES Public Financing Plan Downtown Tax Increment $ 7 , 000 , 000 Small Cities Develop. Grant 750 , 000 Economic Development Grant 200, 000 MN Dept . of Transportation 910,000 Utilities Capital Improvement 600, 000 Interest Income 500, 000 Special Assessments 875 , 000 TOTAL REVENUES $10 , 835 , 000 MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (Regular meeting) The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in regular session on March 5, 1984 at 4:30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room. Commissioner Bishop offered a prayer for divine guidance in the deliberations of the Commission. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Bishop and Kirchmeier. Also Superintendent Leaveck and Manager Van Hout. Commissioner Cook, Liaison Wampach, and Secretary Menden were absent. Jim Kephart was also present, BILLS READ: City of Shakopee 20,032.00 A T & T Information System 79.89 Associated Mechanical 16.90 Auto Central Supply 700.00 Border States Electric Supply 55.00 C & H Carpenter Lumber 222.40 Chicago and NW Transportation Co. 1,225.00 City of Shakopee 5,568.00 Clay's Printing 85.80 Copy Equipment, Inc. 19.15 John Dellwo 99.00 Dressen Oil Company 241.62 Eiler Company 28.29 Feed Rite Controls, Inc. 186.64 Graybar Electric Supply Co. , Inc. 246.00 H & C Electric Supply 38.81 Hagen Systems 780.87 Industrial Sales and Service 679.30 Lathrop Paint and Supply 7.01 Layne Minnesota 100.42 Leef Bros. , Inc. 16.00 Malkerson Motors 29.30 Environmental Quality Board 303.05 North Star Waterworks Products 453.11 Northern States Power Co. 229,950.79 Northern States Power Co. 780.13 Northern States Power Co. 307.28 Northland Electric Supply Co. 423.14 Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. 297.97 Gene Pass 76.00 Process Measurement Company 17.09 Rick's Autq and Radiator Repair 50.00 Reynolds Welding Supply Co. 44.03 Serco 56.00 Shakopee Public Utilities Company 534.74 Shakopee Services 18.00 Dean Smith Trenching Co. 450.00 Southwest Suburban Publishing Co. 103.62 Starks Cleaning Service 17.30 Suel Business Equipment 45.63 Truck Utilities and Manufacturing Co. , Inc. 240.90 Lou Van Hout 57.02 573.90 Voss Electric Supply Co. 4 9 Water Products Co. 94.33 Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Bishop that the bills be allowed and ordered paid. Motion carried. Manager Van Hout gave the Commission an update on the status of Well #3. Commissioner Bishop questioned the rusty water at the Junior High School recently. Manager Van HOut gave an update on the office remodeling. The adjourned regular meeting will be held on March 15, 1984 at 4:30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room. Motion by Bishop,seconded by Kirchmeier that the meeting be adjourned. -6u Va Hout, Manager TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer RE: T.H. 101 Frontage Road DATE: February 14, 1984 Introduction: Attached is the summary of Engineering Fees and Costs for the above referenced project . I also attached page 5 of the Feasibility Report which has a similar summary. Background: The Feasibility Report specifies the total fee for tech- nical services will total $130,935 .00. The City would take $53 ,815 .00 for contract administration and assessment prepar- ation leaving $77 ,120 for the consultant ' s fee . Based on the February 10, 1984 letter attached , the con- sultant ' s fee will probably total $84, 108 . 96 . This amount exceeds the estimated fee by $6 ,988. 96 . My estimate of the remaining City costs is below. Contract Administration $34 , 146 . 00 City Administrative Fee 6 ,829 .00 Appraisal 3 ,000.00 Sub Total $43 ,975 . 00-- Consultant ' s Fee 84, 108 . 96 Total Technical Services $128,083.96 I am bringing this to your attention because it repre- sents an increase of $6 ,988.96 in the consultant ' s fee . I do not expect any other change from the Feasibility Report , but if there is , I will pass it along. 571-6066 UBURBAN I 6875 Highway No. 65 N. E. %j NQIINEERINQ P.O. Box 32308 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55432, INC. 890-6510 Civil, Municipal & Environmental Engineering I i 12350 River Ridge Blvd. Land Surveying • Land Planning • Soil Testing Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 a Feb. 10,1984 S79127 City of Shakopee 129 lst Ave. East Shakopee, MN 55379 Attn: H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer Re: TH 101 Frontage Road Dear Mr. Spurrier: Enclosed herewith is a summary of estimated engineering costs for the above referenced project. The fees are based on a percentage of estimated construt- ion costs and on hourly charges for extra services according to terms of our agreement with the City. It should be noted for budgeting purposes that a significant part of the total costs are subject to change when the final construction costs are determined. They are indicated by special notification on the enclosed summary. We suggest this matter be reviewed again after bids are taken when more accurate construction costs are known. Sincerely, William E. Price, P.E. SUBURBAN ENGINEERING, INC. WEP/lh enc Robert Minder,Reg.Eng. Wm.E.Price,Reg.Eng. H. William Rogers,Reg.Surv. Gary R.Harris,Reg.Surv. Peter J.Molinaro,Reg,Eng. Wm.E.Jensen,Reg.Eng. William J.Brezinsky,Reg.Eng. Robert Sikich,Reg.Suru. Bruce A.Paterson,Reg.Eng. Daniel P.Johnson.Reg.Eng. in, illi =riinrnUr K'4jau e fir,. Our File 57912 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING FEES $ COSTS z Estiipated Construction Cost $682,915.00 Basic Fee - from Curve "A" = 6.60 *Estimated Cost - West End Specials $304,000.00 Estimated Cost of Roadway = $378,915.00 Estimated Cost of West End = 31 .7 Rd. Sta. (53.55%) $202,900.00 Estimated Cost of East End = 27.5 Rd. Sta. (46.44%) $176,015.00 ,,. Redesign 15% of East End = $176,015 x .15 = $ 26,402.00 Total Estimated Construction Cost of Design (1984) $553,302.00 ** A. Design Fee @ .70 X .066 X $533,302 (1984) $24,638.55 $ 24,638.55 Paid to date (1984) (-)$ 3,960.00 Balance to be earned $20,678.55 :l= B. Preliminary Design Engineering Paid to date (1983) $ 5,119.00 Remaining to be Invoiced (1984) $ 596.70 $ 5,715.70 res ** C. Construction Engineering To be earned (1984) .066 X .15 X $682,915.00 = $ 6,760.86 D. Previous Invoices (Paid Prior to 1983) Preliminary and Design Engineer (1981 ) $20,956. 35 Preliminary Engineer (1979) $ 1 ,462.00 Preliminary Engineer (Alignment) (1982) $ 2,080.00 Easements (1982-83) $ 1 ,304.00 Misc. Extra (Preliminary (1981 ) $ 701 .50 Total $ 24,503.85 Refer to Memo of 12/12/83 ** Costs subject to change based on actual construction costs / Ui,UQt YZ. 704 :-.uMMAR 7EC;iNICAL SERVICES (S-E) A. Preliminary Engineering - 1983 Paid to date $5,119.00 To be Invoiced $ 596.70 $ 5,715.70 B. 1984 Design Engineering $24,638.55 Paid to date (-) $3,960.00 To be earned $20,678.55 C. Payments Prior to 1984 Preliminary and final design 1981 $20,956.35 1979 $ 1 ,462.00 1982 $ 2,080.00 Easement descriptions $ 1 ,304.00 Miscellaneous extras $ 701 .50 $26,503.85 SUB-TOTAL $56,858.10 D. Construction Engineering $ 6,760.86 TOTAL $63,618.96 E. Construction Staking $20,490.00 t • 12/12/83 579127 T.H. 101 Frontage Road - Shakopee A. West end Costs (Special ) Culvert "A" $75,000 Cretex Road $33,000 Hyd. Relocation $20,000 Granular Borrow $176,000 $304,000 Length of Realignment - 59.2 - 27.5 = 31 .7 Rd. Sta. = 54% of Total Est. Cost of West End d r,rA� Roadway = 54% of $682,900 - $304,000 = $202,900 Specials $304,000 $507,000 West end basic fee = .0660 x $507,000 = $33,462. West end prelim. @ 15% of basic = $5,019.30 B. Total Preliminary for east end 11 15;0 of .0660 x $175,900 = $ 1 ,741 . 60% Re-useable work (40% of $1 ,741 . ) $ 696.40 C. 50% of Culvert design work complete "A" $75,000 All others $45,000 $120,000 @ .0660 x 50% $3,960.00 Value of Work Completed $9,675. 70 Prevous billing (basic fee - 1983) S5,1 - Hourly Charges since 9/20/83 $3,0( I , �w W w1 w • w wl w w w w w Wl w w w w w wl ♦ �w wl W w W� r • aCCIO *i aiwwwwwwlww wwW • � a .� r •; • ; w� • 1,.W V P VfiA •I C OI W W WI w W wIN N O O O • w w wIW W WI w • '.r • r • O O aIC •O V A W N-•q,,W.�• V P vA • �O Op VIP UA tl W r N • w W•+�..• + ••C • N' A 2 00 'J t O� V) 0:s V(n�rnnr�f7 'ON22Af iNmINz21-0 �- O O D X.rn p V Oi0 O-1i-1-1 O'•-r 0-4 O O fh ►• N -i r�Ri P1 m r .r O '['n M D r (l < H Cl CI f'f T r D;n 3•i c c cl r a n -1 n c I-s x g o n vl z mtc r nI c m.r n n m 2;0 .• .-�r r'O �! n z p.-.-•1-� n D ►••M -1 m n m f")ir♦1 r Ti 3 m "]Cl rn 7 _'_ f'1 o O t � L fi•1IA ymn r.r A r+l N rn rr nr' nACr 11 r-) < nth 2 to timml N u r• ,.� u Orn OI N T n;.. -c D S'I T Gl'O O m Or m IZ < pjQ•1•,IG Vi .-� -i.. 11 r A < n 0 Z Qa'. x A'J to L:T O '7 rn-•A O Y rn A O(11 .p n'.Gl rrl z 1-0 2 1 Po .� r r .m O T i n rn T A.r 2 Gl -• O,m-1-c'< C T M nI O n,i to O rD m C' 1 z M n c x a r z rn ,•, n l,z n s =: s; . IN. a . . x -+,r'1 s z� x cn' a• 1 rn r'n.r r v a, -� C.T -•'. •-. O -�y x a . 2•1 -�� m VI ',� -r r m D m rn.r D .? fl Z (n ,-• 2 .. z�m o. Dmn.nn rnaN, r1 mgr nn -n 1>xrn ;l t n .� rn tf c.. om n n rnm . n ,� rS �r �c fK•1 n 1 N r < D 2:2 H'')-• Cl. IT (n L I i F'l t •7 Z H L7 n r �'1 aA ',cD ,-�W, r JGI � T ; • O ; D:ti rn Ut .rC -n '4 7 C rrt a O:• 1'1 r z rn, -r x ,� r ,•I m Jz C aC7 Z -i I'1m -•p 1 y 1 N ., 1 y . A 1 1 A N �1 y( H N N m ,n O n rn N m C'. rn 2: CI m n C A W N O C N + p A O O W V pp m oN P p ..I O c >o .1 A • • • 0, r"00 0: 70A j V az w O vt P w A C • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • j • • • • • • • • + W • • < C O '„O;7.7 V1 U U r7 D 10 ,] cJ t !7•l•7 c7 l•J. •. t U C•J J OO.� P 7 rJ• P00.07 0001,70'70 O 00 VIOr7gtn J '7 ro QUO p .) J J r -c z o c z rn 1 c = ao D A rn D T L Irl 0 m p ' 1 T n 10 ry A m A A P. A -+ w A 00 J 00 rA P 00 A O 00 W O in : p-+ 6T r y..r A.yt •O P'+ A N O O O O N00 O W QOO A • • • +ON NNNN • • • • • 00 V Ow 00 O'O O 10 Pv 0uC uUO UOutOP V N w00P A000 N O N M AO O 10 A000 H p0 OO O O WUUU UCi 000 Q Ou 11 0 000 O'O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ✓t o uA C 0 0 0 0 O O O O U O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%0 O O O J 0 0 0 0 q O O 0%0 0 0 0%O O O O O Z 0 0 7 O 0 o O':O J 0 0 J 0 0 0 r 7 J O q O J O !>O O.>.n ] r'l 0 0 0 n n 0n :_�o O .30 C, m v. A n q O NN : A ,•, • O A Vi P O A ND r0 O V m L)oo P J j j Wp W a vt c1 A .1 V A a 00 A o a c n • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • . . . • • . • • • . • • • . • • • • • • . • • • -'rn o 0000 w 0000000�n00000000 0 01C%loo 0 o 000'0 0I01-0U0"700 ^lc, Tvl 0 v1 rj rl 100 O O O 2• r 0 N n � N � N r r a j �Of O P• A w A ..• P W W w A •O m b I W V 00, O . v1' V-+ W W'.• W.p r" W.rJt A 'O O O A +' • • . c No• -• o wGao v vA o0 00 • • �• • • . . • f 000 !O .•i NO:�pO A PO 00 V 00 O1NP �'P Ow N 00000 p�.Or iN 'A O O SOI O OI N O V 0 0 O O ut O A r,P.0 .p of O N O O O A • • • i• • • • • • • • • *0 • • • • • • • • • • 0 00� '"O T O O O P !v1 O N H1 • • • • • • • • '.• • • D 00010 00'�OOvt000000 00 00 00 w0 ut X00 O. O N v1000 V O vl Ovl O 0 0 OOO n OOIA 0(700000 V OOn r ;70%A C0-1,N '"71 n V 0000 vt 000N Irl c) • � i yr P a o ^, ry ul m ✓t .p ��N W V d O O a'a N O' • • • T f7 Ilk3 r •. W'..•wWWWWWIww W.WWw:w i •, `O Lt: 'A V V V 1✓1 s s�vl VI S'Vl s vwi.Jt.Wil rl s s JWI'N'LQ A VWI,vwi .WJI n' n i •' .0 W-+rjpwrrr'rW WwNNNNNN-++ r N r O N W,N N P w N r 0 0p Jo 0 1110 O H AIN G)ff'i(nn V11. T, T _tL DInN O'. 1 w 'DIMm 2 m1-1 n Oar• t O m n H 0 Z D J1 o D.n rn 2 Vl • -0 -1 -1'n C.N . 4.Y(n m rn 2 -Y H r d V!r G Z 2.0 0 1s('] A'C D fn rI T .7 '0 n a r H m b -Y• � �) J • fn'. Il..A O r = �•1 tl -1 f7^t � . .-• • �. < O :J 1'1 � �•1• N i CO Q r Mi rl 0 2 O s ..co 2 rn n (11 7 v n 11 A Y 1 0 (A 0 n m .I GI V a r Mi rn v>.n N r7 n .• s n T1 (n O C '1 u o n t z u .•I c n.•1 1 m' nyj7 HJC (70 :70 711 rn Z Nf y -1 J r r.-. D • -Y ! i A 11 ^•nI D D r 0 ;L G m m • rn U o '1 n M s z n O i. X 11. V) T 71 r nCrruJ r7 ANtnz2JC s vOn-Y = f•12 ... D a n.u. ~►.N it U w w r ff. 13 n o O `C N mr) �nLr 1 Y -Y�. ,V T '< D D fn�n -1 en O T1 'n 1 71 91 Aj z z 2l/1 0U) 1. Z GAS A I 11 a 0'111 71rr, n�11 in o m(Az •. z .1 r in 0 014 rzj In In m • 71 � • .i1 r'1 In N C m N 9 rl ti 1 D G r+l r c r1 CI C= • A y O O wP P Pr + ....-. + .r .� P O 4r �' N`n 'r N 'v V�] ,�,•1• • • • • • • • • • • • 10• 0 O N1: VI:• ) 1 C ')(I•�V'J CL rJ V C]V1•.)•U J U:J fJ'J J !J JO•� U V1 O C '1 x r r U o 0•�o c�q,J »o 1 I r a O C Z m -I 0 i N I n � n rr A 1 O A y N • V V W .• "I P W '' P ✓t r N + J N 0 W0• VI VIN : r N • • • • • • • r• • +• J° -1 O CON 00 ut �:OW OCOVIO • N 64. V U L V C]U O G O O c A o 000 �u( r]uuo00o cuQ 1 • 000000u00000 0000000000 < O O O O J O O O O O O O q• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • m J O •3 C-)0 0 0 J 0 0,7 0 0 C'3 C�C', r]O L]O O O O O 2 OOr] p�]•7�Jn�000,�r] .]oo C m -t r rn r a • • ��j C 00 N • • P N W tb.+C 9 a d 00 P OW�j 1010P wNN`O V+P P NO D y (A . vlr r a 0C ov,+v, v0 n • • • • •0• • • •0 0• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • -/O A CDS r0.000-+• 00OO OiVl OO r00'W OOOp,O.+ONO C T r d, Co 40 O O O O Oi+0': P O O 0 0 C r 0 Vt n W O A ro N fli N n 1 W W O• O + W P U V V7N:N OI I. r r N.• +O+ rTl 00 • • +w r '0' c V d ON'. OAS BOO • • . • • • . • 1 r- in 00 00 A 0 0 0 P A�vl 0 0 0 0 0•O O O W 00 V1 00 00 V r N 00•OD • WO uOO OVI O vl W Oo 0V 0O D W 0uO '0 0 O O O vA 0 Out• • • • • C VINO H co -♦' v1 O�000pp•Opp0000%100N O O td 000 WOc•O V 0 n %0+O r1 O V O O'+O O A O O O O O O P O VI O W f7 n T 1 1 1 1 1 1' / 1 '1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 0 b o r ut +w n t r V' N 0• ,p N .p V N P+N 00 f'1 W P N W vI p OG O%I%I w P O n t � N 1 i • - . -� . gee no ,a ? . auv .. • V i� ,� ► �� t crwW WWWW.w .rNWWw ' AP AAAAAA • �.Ai �+A j �j j 6r7 ;. ,•. ♦ y • '0 .0 V avl .�+ NNr�• • rA W W ..1Nrr VI.n v1AAA W r � C • •Or OOACOOICrOPU ♦ N-+ nN.� N�nO ♦ N <ON Cwrl O fl;2 .C• -fD -1 -� CIC Or`t-4z A,A-1 Dr )D ao rq' C .`7 D _��n �� t7 r_ 7C t 17 '3 m60 >N CJ r Z P O m A 1 ! u t7 m .y p 2: 0 I N A'1�_s 2;^•N.•.P C ('I -4 rJ C ,�C C r1 7 O fn Min r`1 P < e L O .� n ~, }I -1 ?n•y ]: r7 rri L r A3 7,, O r n r C r .] n O c� Z A (�rn L! b r •, n -1 -• .y 71 2 N r`1 P ^I^l. rl -1�i•r �_ n r i r r • < rzwp 1 n 1h v, r ..r L7 - -/ r z r 1-i n vNi <) c`' �7`i r r 'I 2 n o .. ..• 7 0 AV - C 1 r^ P Vr2 17 c, _ d2 :'t ir•r v' 11 T ') y < f•t t1 r V O 2 c G f i H V X an C f9 1/1 rn 111 0. (A / '�-1 • I - S 1 1 I 1 U rI Lo IT) �r r�mL)(n C � ? p0 �` r�ty3rA N r•r�>r �1 �1 1 TT .•, �7 I Il 'n D Z 1 a nll . .o cw s non rr .r x r s tl? A � vN n rTiN v X. •.� �� .,1 nr' r ) n o rQ N �I r7 W • I !)I'' Lt < al Tl :L) L') 3 •.t j '1 G•' •-•n f'1 n 'a C � ►� 1'I t1 w q )r •1 ., n a o • t7 t � D U U a 0 0 0 N P H z(l C m N K � � O :O r.• = N N N. ..~ v n .nrrvt L14 1:3 7l r•� J ,Q JJ, ✓T. .V.J �'��A�: AJ A JAAOOCS �v.0i wC • N v ,O .O •r • •.i•�• •v•,p r -v 'P w v ) •1 IJ L1 O '0 -7 v. 1n i•1�n ,^ t ]iJ A•T J�• V r 'i;J:.� v N VI 'J v; r !_ C"7 ] •O 7 .O a U J '!1 N P P O N W O-J V -+ ..]Cl Vr J N '0 W A r T> U 1 r -+ a P D b 70 17 •'1 ] '1 r> T H H W W A N • • n •CA+ VO•OC]•OAO.�o•�O•O O• •VI•O vI O G •n P A A N A WV ro� v=Po•Ar� PU AV N N V � r ;ID Pvuo • t7 WV1 Pr V O OA O U 0�01 • • • • • • •OO OO O'O OO OO 0O0L> OO OO.O'�•UCJC• •OUO• •O O• •O•O O O) O O�+ O O G vt A P ti P vl•,p•O•u.n•_ rDvJ1 , *0 1U > JnOuU n0 � ]o o � oOcoo ., G 2 < (•t WN N • • 1:1 • • •� • • • • • • • • • • P• ~• • A W W �O ..A r V1 •O V VI � ± U • • I N N A v 1 r N V U 'n•O V A N j n G v 1 W N j r j .... 3o A J1 U V i tle r D • • • V N Oo V �D r to0,; n -+ N i • • • • • • UNP P G O a O A OA O OOAJ -• oZ, c-,NOr OC_70 WPAO V ,o JONO Ar]p ,p y,l HO O I O O O' O A C1 v O 0 I N P P CIC O P O'•] W P G O OTr U p J -• ]GW OrOrss C•, T r o ' n j 1 W W A ..• r r • -� 10 V V N N v r 00 A W A P:ANN -W `r W A N A N j A V r7 r W fn p • • • � N v W:vl: • . �. . . •O w A I +• �` •O .O O NPNNAO A • • • . . • • . . • .• < VNJWr0N •O O VIN-•AOP P OA ODW V P W I- C P P V V , VIO 'O VINdC41N WNOw JD O O,O V W0000 A "•00 om A ,O'b m i O O v OOw V Vr VtPNO WOOr V PdA VINr ►. • • • • • • • • • • • • • O 0, M Oy00 0 0 P w P O N O 0 0 V O•v 00• • • P r o o, 2 q P O P W O O V r 0•A A O r O A J J V A G.7 g A p U n r ) N f) D N N : p, NNV10 VINON N N r V r ry r ... N N N V + li-•N N W vl V P A .V W ... � V O N N V N S I I I co r ni� o0 491 n �l la i ; JI n z -C A r1 2 0 T n n r) z C: n z ^ n m yr ..• a = T y n t7 M a r L J N C4 n r rn A T A O Ai -• D O 2 n c rn z x a ; a rz -4 z • • • -i i C O � C 1 .a n a a � fl rl r1l O 7 A � �1 -i N n P ] O O Oo 00 N N Jo O N P N P P V • • • • • • n V O O O O O y 0 0 0 o. 2 K N n + a i r i b W A ~ N i • H O N O O O 17 O 00 n C .T I CD r] o q b N D 1 I N p i O C-3 O f�1 JD 'A OP N N t N A P %A V1 V1 'A 'A O �. Oo O A C • • • • n I O O 0 0 7 p I I N O O O O O n p I M O f C I TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ .REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA MARCH 19, 1984 - MONDAY - Mayor Reinke presiding 1] Roll Call at 7 :00 P.M. 2] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 31 RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 41 Approval of Consent Business - (All items listed with an asterick are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. ) 51 Approval of Minutes of February 16, and 29, 1984 and March 6, 1984 61 Communications: a] Nancy E . Christensen, resignation from Downtown Ad Hoc Committee b] 71 Public Hearings: 7 :30 P.M. Appeal from the Planning Commission' s approval of a Conditional Use Permit for construction of a ballroom to be located on 4th Avenue East of Valley Cemetery 81 Boards and Commissions : Planning Commission: a] Rezoning Request by Prahm-Coll Properties for a 10 acre co parcel on 4th Avenue East of Valley Cemetery from R-4 (Multi-family residential ) to B-2 (Community business) - Ordinance No. 142, Amending the Zoning Ordinance - bring c item 10C from February 21st Council meeting b] Preliminary and Final Plat of Prahm-Coll First Addition a 20 acre parcel lying East of Valley Cemetery - Res. No. 2224, Approving Plat - bring item 10d from 2/21st Cncl .Mtg. c] Conditional Use Permit Res. No. CC-358, Permitting construc- tion of a ballroom facility in a B-2 District d] Preliminary Plat of Fox Run First Addition a 32+ acre parcel lying South of Horizon Heights and West of Muhlenhardt Road Ad Hoc Downtown Committee : e] Downtown Concept Plan - Implementation Cable Communications Advisory Commission f] Approval of channel changes g] Cable service to West 3rd Avenue h] 1983 Annual Report 91 Reports from Staff: a] Appointment to Shakopee Public Utilities Commission b] Purchase of A Snowplow Vehicle c] Huber Park Trail Restrooms d] Computer System Selection e] Personnel Policy Amendment *f] Sewer Bill g] Approve bills in amount of $569 , 101 . 78 h] Storm Water Drainage Utility (bring item 6c from 2/14 agenda) 10] Resolutions and Ordinances: *a] Res. No. 2237, Denying Application to Vacate Certain Streets and Alleys - request by Gene Brown tabled Feb. 7th *b] Res. No. 2236, Initiating Vacation of Part of Drainage Easement c] Res. No. 2238, Initiating Vacation of alley easement in Eagle Bluff 2n 11] Other Business : - memo on table a] 1984 LMC Annual Conference b] 121 Adjourn to Monday, April 2, 1984 at 4: 30 P.M. John K. Anderson, City Administrator OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ .REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 16, 1984 Acting Mayor Leroux called the meeting to order at 5 :37 P.M. with Cncl . Wampach, Vierling and Colligan present. Mayor Reinke and Cncl .Lebens were absent. Also present were John K. Anderson, City Administrator, Gregg Voxland, Finance Director and H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer. The City Engineer explained the need for council action to authorize the printing of the draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Shakopee race track site . He reported that the preliminary draft before Council was 99% of everything related to thei•race track environmentally and that the printed copy would incorporate the comments of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, which consist of minor revisions to the text in the summary . Mr. Leroux asked if there were any questions, and there were none. Colligan/Wampach moved to approve the printing of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Shakopee Racetrack site incorporating the comments of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Motion carried unanimously. The Finance Director explained the IRS recent ruling affecting the city' s health care salary reduction plan. He also explained that our consultant is doing some checking on it. Colligan/Wampach moved to table discussion on the City ' s health care salary reduction plan. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Wampach moved that the following names be contacted for submittal to the Scott County Board for appointment to the Prior Lake Spring Lake Watershed District in order to find a nominee for the vacancy on the Board : George Shutrop, Albert Tessmer and William Whipps. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Wampach moved to adjourn to Tuesday, February 21 , 1984 at 7 :00 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 5 : 53 P.M. John K. Anderson Recording Secretary Judith S. Cox City Clerk OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ .REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 29 , 1984 Mayor Reinke called the meeting to order at 12 : 20 P.M. at Capone ' s Family Restaurant , Shakopee, Minnesota with Cncl . Colligan, Wampach, and Leroux present. Cncl .Vierling and Lebens were absent . Also present were depart- ment heads: H.R. Spurrier, Leroy Houser, Gregg Voxland, Jim Karkanen, George Muenchow, Jeanne Andre, and Admr.John Anderson. Joe Ries , Fire Chief arrived late at 1 : 15 P .M. Council and department heads resumed their February 28th discussion of 1983 goals and objectives deleting items completed, discussing and restating items that were to be carried over for 1984. Leroux/Colligan moved to adjourn at 2 : 40 P .M. Motion carried unanimously. John K. Anderson Recording Secretary Judith S . Cox City Clerk OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MARCH 6, 1984 Mayor Reinke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Cncl. Wampach, Leroux, Vierling and Colligan present. Absent was Comm. Lebens. Also present were John K. Anderson, City Admr. ; H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer and Julius A. Coller, II, City Attorney. Liaison reports were presented by Councilmembers. Mayor Reinke asked if there was anyone present in the audience who wished to address the Council on any item not on the agenda, and there was no response. Vierling/Wampach moved to approve the minutes of February 14, 1984 as kept. Roll Call; Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Colligan/Vierling moved to approve the minutes of February 21, 1984 as kept. Motion carried with Cncl. Leroux abstaining because of his absence at that meet- ing. Leroux/Vierling moved to approve the minutes of February 28, 1984 as kept. The City Admr. pointed out an error in the minutes in the last sentence of the first paragraph where reference is made to Joe Ries, Scott County Administrator which should be Joe Ries, Fire Chief. Leroux/Vierling moved to amend the minutes to refer to Joe Ries, Fire Chief. Motion to amend carried unanimously. Main motion as amended carried unanimously. Discussion was held regarding the availability of any Councilpersons to go to the LMC Legislative Action Conference. No one will be available. Leroux/Vierling moved to receive the Mediation Petition and Meeting Notice from the Bureau of Mediation Services for the police officers. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Wampach offered Resolution No. 2234, A Resolution Opposing the Cable Communications Act of 1983, and moved to send it to Congressman Frenzel, Senators Boschwitz and Durenberger and other officials who should be aware of the City's position. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. George Muenchow, Community Services Director, reviewed the proposed budget and plan for the 1984 season for the swimming pool. He said that weather is the single most important factor in revenues for the pool. Considerable discussion ensued regarding the fees for season tickets, whether there should be a price break for those purchasing earlier, and the length of time the pool is open. Colligan/Leroux moved to set $29 as the fee for season tickets, no matter when purchased. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Vierling moved to approve the 1984 Municipal Swimming Pool Plan as pre- sented, with the amendment to the ticket price. Motion carried unanimously. Lem ux/Wampach moved to authorize advertising for bids for the JEJ drainage of the former Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad right-of-way. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling moved to approve the payment of $3,150.00 to Darwin and Arlissm Gilbertson for the storm sewer easement, for JEJ drainage. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Vierling/Leroux moved to authorize staff to advertise for bids for the Tahpah Park Sewer and Water Service. Motion carried unanimously. Shakopee City Council March 6, 1984 J Page 2 The City Admr. explained the possible problems with the proposed plan for indi- vidualized health care accounts as a. part of the 1984 benefit package as regards an IRS ruling. Discussion ensued regarding the alternatives. Leroux/Wampach moved to authorize the payment of $45 per month to employees with single insurance coverage and the payment of the difference of the $195 per month benefit level and the average insurance premium when the premium is less than $195 per month to the employees with family coverage; such payment to be part of a payroll check. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Wampach moved to declare three 1980 Malibu's, two 1979 Malibu's and one Granada surplus property. Roll Call; Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Leroux/Colligan moved that bills in the amount of $55,961.09 be allowed and ordered paid. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. The City Admr. explained the LMC position on comparable worth policy. He said it is a political issue that will be coming up and the League just wants local units of government to be able to address it, instead of having something man- dated by the State. Discussion followed. Colli gan/Vierling moved to authorize the proper City officials to vote in favor of the proposed 1984 League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Policies and Priori- ties. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Wampach offered Resolution No. 2232, A Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications for the 1984 Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk and Driveway Approach Replacement Program, Improvement No. 1984-2, and moved its adoption. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Vierling/Wampach offered Resolution No. 2231, A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2203. Designating Official Depositories of City Funds, and moved its adoption. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. The City Admr. gave some background on the Local Government Aid formula. Colligan/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2230, A Resolution Recommending That the State of Minnesota Local Government Aid Formula be Frozen for Fiscal Year 1985, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Leroux moved to direct the appropriate City officials to forward a copy of Resolution No. 2230 to the City's State Representatives and the Municipal Caucus. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Wampach offered Resolution No. 2233, A Resolution Promoting Downtown Redevelopment by Jointly Participating with the Shakopee Jaycees in Securing the New State Jaycees Office Building, and moved its adoption. The City Admr. pointed out a typographical error in the resolution. He also explained that a portion of Lots 4 and 5 are owned by Northwestern Bell, and language should be added to the resolution to exclude that portion. He said he would insert "excluding the 3825 square feet not now owned by the City" . He said he has been in touch with Northwestern Bell, and he thinks the City will be able to purchase that property to add to the parcel to be offered to the Jaycees. He said the Jaycees will be able to utilize those lots even if the Northwestern Bell portion is not included. Ray Hussong, of the Jaycees, said the Jaycees are a public charity, and as such do not pay real estate taxes. The City Admr. added that Burnsville is competing for the location of the State Jaycees building, and both cities will be making a proposal on March 8, 1984. He suggested several alternatives for making Shakopee's location more attractive. He explained further the alternative involving obtaining a Certificate of In- debtedness for the Tahpah Park sewer construction, which would free up additional funds for the local Jaycees chapter to contribute to developing this property. Mr. Hussong said he thinks the Shakopee property is attractive, but there has to be a very strong proposal in terms of location, dollars and interest rate. The bank representative said they could issue a Certificate of Indebtedness for $70,000 at 9% interest. Discussion followed. Shakopee City Council March 6, 1984 • J Page 3 Mr. Hussong explained that the building will be used for meetings, with probably an average of two to three meetings per evening. He said there is also a larger meeting room that could be available to the public when available. He said there will not be any dancing or recreational use of it. He would anticipate the building might be between 3300 and 4000 sq. feet. Colligan/Wampach moved to amend the Resolution No. 2233 to add to the end of No. 1: "excluding the 3825 square feet not now owned by the City. " Motion to amend the resolution carried unanimously. Resolution No. 2233 Roll Call; Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Leroux/Wampach moved that the City will consider a Certificate of Indebtedness for the Tahpah Park construction of the sewer line, if the Shakopee Jaycees agree to make the payments on that Certificate, and if the State Jaycees are successful in locating the State office building in Shakopee. Motion carried unanimously. Wampach/Leroux moved for a five minute recess at 9:10 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Wampach moved to re-convene at 9:28 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. The City Admr. said that Clete Link has some property he would like to develop south of 12th Avenue. In connection with that, he is questioning the City about sewer availability and the Council's position on allowing a lift station for sewer for property not able to be served by gravity flow. The City Engineer said that in order for Mr. Link to develop his entire parcel, it would be necessary to install a lift station. He said that from information supplied from the Infiltration/Inflow study he knew that certain manholes were surcharged when the pool was in operation, and certain sewers along 6th Ave. were near full to full. He pointed out on the map the areas of sewer that are sur- charged:and those that have a reserve. He said the area immediately adjacent to the proposed development have a reserve, but that line runs into 6th Avenue, which is surcharged. He said this line cannot take any additional flow unless something is done. He said that even without any additional development, the overload problem is bad enough that something should be done to correct it. He stated pressure is being put on that line that it is not designed to take. He said these numbers are predicated on water conservation and operational changes being made at the pool. Further discussion followed regarding just what areas are affected and alternatives for solving it. Cncl. Colligan stated he believes the thinking that gravity sewer systems will serve all of Shakopee is naive, and he is ready to consider lift stations. Cncl. Leroux and Vierling agree. Discussion ensued regarding a continuing charge against a subdivision or an association served by a lift station because of the increased maintenance involved. The City Engineer stated that Minnesota Valley Restoration has three .lift stations, and Valleyfair also has a lift station, which they each own and maintain 100f. He said the developer in this case will develop a criteria for a system serving this subdivision, and then the City will look at the opera- tional cost of that specific kind of system. Mr. Link said that right now there is a demand for lots in Shakopee. He didn't know if he was interested in developing all of the parcel. He asked if the City would be interested in a portion of it to connect with Tahpah Park. He would first like to develop the area that can be served by gravity flow, and then maybe install a temporary lift station with enough units to pay for the cost of the system. Council consensus was no interest in further park land there because of the other parks and schools nearby, 13th Avenue proposed to go through and the drainage swale. Colligan/Leroux moved to authorize staff to study the area served by the Adams Street Sanitary Sewer for the purpose of establishing reconstruction recommenda- tions and development recommendations for the service area. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Mr. Link said he wants to have lots available in a few months, he doesn't want to wait a year. Continued discussion ensued regarding a time line for the study. Mr. Link said he would probably only develop the area that could be served by gravity at this time, and not think about a lift station until next year. He Shakopee City Council March 6, 1984 Page 4 is concerned about the City`s time line for addressing the sewer availability problem, because he doesn't want to spend thousands of dollars on engineering for his project and then have to shelve it because of a sewer overload. The City Admr. said he would not want to give Mr. Link the go ahead to develop this property until Council has seen the report on the problem and made a de- cision on how and when to correct the overload condition. Asked about the priority for fixing this overload condition, the City Engineer replied that there are more people affected by this overload than in any other area of the City. Mr. Link said that time is of the essence, and if he has a consensus on a lift station, he could start a preliminary plat. He thought he might do an overall preliminary, but just plat what could be served with gravity. The City Admr. clarified that there is not consensus on allowing a lift station, but only to agree to consider using one. He stated there is a platting process with staff approval involved, and he doesn't want decisions to be made without proper staff study. The City Engineer thought he could have information on a time line for the study by next week's meeting. The City Attorney said the City has nothing to vacate as far as streets and alleys are concerned, in the property Gene Brown has requested the City to vacate. However, the City does have some pipe in the property. The DNR, which will be the ultimate owner, will accept a deed from Gene Brown subject to the right of the City to-maintain, operate and reconstruct existing pipe and powerline. Mayor Reinke asked about being able to expand the services. The City Attorney said he would add language for expanding. He said it would be very costly for the City to locate the lines, and therefore this blanket easement will be used. The City Admr. said staff is preparing a resolution stating the application from the Shakopee Racetrack is in order, to be presented at the March 15, 1984 Racing Commission Hearing. Leroux/Vierling moved to adjourn to March 13, 1984 at 7;00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 10;55 p.m. Judith -S. Cox, City Clerk Diane S. Beuch Recording Secretary Greater Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce Chamber of Commerce Building, 15 South Fifth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612)370-9132 February 17, 1984 Mr. Daniel G. Steil 583 S. Minnesota Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Dan: It is with regret that I submit my resignation from the Downtown Ad Hoc Committee. My duties at the Minneapolis Chamber call for several early morning meetings a month. Since the days of these meetings are not always predictable, I find that I cannot consistently be in attend- ance for the Downtown Ad Hoc meetings. If there is any other way I can be of service to the committee, please don't hesitate to call on me. I remain deeply interested and supportive of downtown redevelopment. If possible, I would like to continue receiving the mailings. Sincerely, 1 l —t_ Nancy E. Christensen Manager State Legislative Affairs NEC/mjk Cv MEMO TO : John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM : Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Developers Agreement for Prahm-Coll First Addition DATE: March 16, 1984 Introduction Because the Planning Commission has recommended that some conditions be contained in the developers agreement , which are ordinarily not , and because the sanitary sewer and watermain improvements are not contemplated for construction in the near future , staff recommends that the standard developers agreement be somewhat revised for this subdivision. Background The following revisions are recommended for Prahm-Coll First Addition developers agreement : 1 ) Page 5 - VI - Add language making this agreement also a Petition for improvements , as noted. 2 ) Page 5 - VII - Add and delete language which also makes this agreement a petition. This section also refers to the method of payment section in the agreement . 3 ) Page 6 - VII D - Delete language requiring execution of a Petition for public improvements . 4) Page 7 - VII E - Amend the language to provide payment of special assessments according to the assessment resolution to be adopted and delete the other three payment methods as outlined on pages 7 , 85 9 , and 10. These three payment methods afford protection to the City in the event the developer moves his more desirable lots and doesn' t pay his taxes and special assessments on his less desirable lots . He is also required to pay any special assessments due the City, in full , prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any structure on any lot . In the case of Prahm-Coll 1st Addition, there are only two lots . Outlot "A" will have to be platted before a building permit may be issued and Lot 1 , Block 1 , will be built upon way before these improvements are planned. Hence , such payment methods are really not appropriate . 5 ) Page 10 - (F) - Delete also. This refers to one of the three payment methods just described. 6 ) Page 10 - (H) - Delete , since the City does not desire to hold up construction on Lot 1 , Block 1 until the sanitary sewer and watermain are constructed. Developers Agreement for Prahm-Coll First Addition Page Two March 16 , 1984 7 ) Page 13 - Section X has been added to include in the developers agreement those four additional conditions of approval of the plat as recommended by the Planning Commission. Under Item ( c ) - The developer may chose to deliver an easement now rather than sometime in the future . If this is the case , this section should be deleted from the developers agreement , and I trust this would be a staff formality. The easement will describe the location of an easement which can be moved at a later date , at the expense of the developer, if he so requests . 8) Page 14 - E - Adds language which acknowledges that the City is not requiring construction of the improvements at this time and that the developer is being given permission to construct +70 ' of sanitary sewer, at his expense , at this time , which will permit him to develop Lot 1 , Block 1 . 9 ) Page 15 - XI - Adds language which makes it clear that the fee owner of Outlot A, Mr. Siedel , is not bound to the conditions of this agreement which pertain to Lot 1 , Block 1 . Alternatives a ) Approve the developers agreement as proposed . h) Make amendments . c ) Use the standard developers agreement . Recommended Action Authorize and direct staff to enter into a developers agreement with the developers of Prahm-Coll First Addition which will include the conditions contained in Resolution No. 2224 and which will permit the developer to pay for special assessments due as a result of construction of improvements contained therein, according to the assessment resolution. JSC/jms MEMO TO: John Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judi Simac, City Planner RE: Appeal to Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 358 DATE: March 15, 1984 Introduction: At their February 9, 1984 meeting the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 358 which permits the applicant, Prahm-Coll Properties to construct a ballroom facility in a B-2 District. The action of the Planning Commission was appealed on February 13 , 1984 by Nancy Goemer of 2525 E. Fourth Ave, Shakopee. Background: The Conditional Use Permit was approved subject to conditions No. 1 through 6 as listed in the attached case report dated February 3 , 1984 . Following lengthy public testimony the Planning Commission recommended to include Conditions No. 7 through 10 as listed below: 7 . A minimum of one patrolman for general admission events for up to 200 persons ; a minimum of 2 patrol- men up to 400 persons and a minimum of 3 patrolmen for 400 and above persons . 8 . There will be an owner, operator or manager on site during general admission hours . 9 . Applicant must maintain all exterior lighting in working order and police (clean) area regularly. 10 . Annual Planning Commission review of the Conditional Use Permit. Please find attached a copy of the letter of appeal and a petition against the approval of the Conditional Use Permit which was submitted to the Planning Commission on February 9 , 1984 and was requested to be submitted to the City Council also. Action Requested: Motion by City Council to approve Conditional Use Permit Resolution of the City Council No. CC-358 permitting construction of a ballroom facility in a B-2 District subject to the ten con- ditions as approved and adopted by the Planning Commission. Attachments CITY OF SHAKOPEE y CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. CC- 358 WHEREAS , Prahm-Coll Properties having duly filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit ate January 19 , 1984 under the provisions of the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance , Section 11 . 04 , Subd 6 . 11 . 30 , Subd. 3 as follows : to construct a ballroom facility in a B-2 Comm__unity_ Business__ zoned area ; and WHEREAS , the property upon which the request is being; made is described as : the N. 340 . 42 ft. of the W. 639 . 80 ft. of the E. 705 . 80 ft . of the N.E. ; of the S .W. ; of S 5, T 115, R 22 and WHEREAS , said proposed Conditional Use Permit request was approved by the Shakopee Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee , Minnesota at their meeting held Februar 9 1984 and said Conditional Use Permit decision is herewith eing appealed to the City Council ; and WHEREAS , the Shakopee City Council on March 19, 1984 held a public hearing on the appeal from the decision of the Planning Commissie NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that upon hearing the advice and recommendations of the Shakopee Planning Commission and upon considering the suggestions made by the applicant and the suggestions and objections raised by the affected property owners , within a radius of 350 feet thereof , in public hearings duly held by the Shakopee Planning Commission and the Shakopee City Council , that the aforementioned Conditional Use Permit be and is hereby approved pursuant to the following: 1. Approval is contingent upon the applicant obtaining rezoning and preliminary a--nJ-7-1-nai plat appluvai from City Council to develop the site. 2 . T e --appi scant shall prove e proo 6 owners ip o _ property to the City Planner prior to release of the building permit. -- _ 3 . The applicant must provide proof of an easement for the easterly access to the site or designate an aiterna. i.ve second access to be approved by the City Engineer. 4 . Approval is contingent upon approval by the City Planner of a site plan to be submitted by the applicant prior to issuance of a building permit. Said plan will indicate adequate buffering to the abutting residential districts and uses , lighting of parking area and walks, re use area, parkingspaces and curbing. BEC?�tPUPA RESOLVED, that pursuant to Shakopee City Code , Sec . 11 . 04 , Subd . 6C-12 , if an approved Conditional Use Permit is not utilized within one year from date herein approved or by March 19 , 19 85 it shall become null and void . Adopted in Regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held t is 19th day of March 19 84 741 TO: Shakopee Planning Commission FROM: Judi Simac , City Planner DATE: February 3 , 1984 ITEM: Application for a conditional use permit APPLICANT: Prahm-Coll Properties LOCATION: East Fourth Avenue in Section 5-115-22 PRESENT ZONING : R-4 (multi-Family Residential) PROPOSED ZONING : B-2 (Community Business) AREA: 5 acres LAND USE : Vacant APPLICABLE REGULATIONS : Section 11 . 04 , Subd . 6 ; Section 11. 30, Subd . 3 FINDINGS REQUIRED: Section 11 . 04 , Subd . 6A PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested a conditional use permit to construct a ballroom facility on a 5 acre parcel proposed to be rezoned B-2 . CONSIDERATIONS : 1 . The applicant is seeking a rezoning of the proposed site of the ballroom from R-4 to B-2 . A commercial recreation facility is a conditional use in a B-2 district . 2 . Plans to develop the ballroom are dependent upon Council app- roval to rezone and plat the property. 3 . The surrounding land uses are light industrial and community business . The rear property line abuts a residential district which requires a fence or evergreen buffer. 4 . Thr proposed ballroom is consistent with community growth areas as identified in the comprehensive plan . 5 . Sanitary sewers and public water are available to the site . 6 . The proposed building capacity is 740 persons , with seating capacity at 550. Code requires 1 space for every 3 seats or 183 . Total parking spaces proposed is 203 . 7 .1 The site provides two traffic accesses , one of which does not abut a public right-of-way. The applicant should demonstrate that an easement can be obtained for the easterly access or designate an alternative second access approved by the City Engineer . 8 . The site consists of sandy soil which requires precautions to prevent erosion during construction. Ali � ,z_� STAFF RECOMMENDATION: , It is recommended that the conditional use permit be approved subject to conditions . ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 358 permitting construction of a ballroom facility in a B-2 district and move for its adoption subject to the following conditions : 1 . Approval is contingent upon the applicant obtaining rezoning and preliminary and final plat approval from City Council to develop the site . 2 . The applicant shall provide proof of ownership of the property to the City Planner prior to release of the building permit . 3 . The applicant must provide proof of an easement for the easterly access to the site or designate an alternative second access to be approved by the City Engineer . 4 . Approval is contingent upon approval by the City Planner of a site plan to be submitted by the applicant prior to issuance of a building permit . Said plan will indicate adequate buffering to the abutting residential districts and uses , lighting of parking area and walks , refuse area , parking spaces and curbing. 5 . Approval by the City Engineer of a final drainage plan of the site . 6 . The applicant will take adequate steps to prevent soil erosion during construction . s`ti+t �� j3t'ttr �lFtt ' a s� r'o1`F;}R } 51�Nfs �Y }??Tat` iE;i+sit #t Ti tiiE%t 't'+.' ':i'i?E: is i►t' F E t s` ` '� :•• ;si,.; `st it ftl'' h iE?{*il,►iiy+,i;i' �. �y.i;i�.•'.` i�it; E,'f�•i{ t,{1 3 fit}N t.? }+ t I;d,iot,t.!is 'E t2i'!s t+.: .lg`F;. .ie• E� ;s;c;:;_, kf ; a{t'�ur.,i�• :L;t+}tjtt. .:• ;�;s;. :?: ;:�.sii}E:�!�� ;�, ,�i.•t;?; ;s;i#:t;3i :.zi�i:' :t;t;s: .�..�.�i::�•%:�+:�il:'•''•a3.s•�1' _ ;y�.; ;�; .�:;.. , li•° .p •1• 't.: a'• .lt ' •j,{: 1' :�:Y.it• !Sl• .tll f.ajf:f tl:it•t�{.4ta:f ii • -• • - '•f �.:.•'•�.�_e_,�.�.+r-��3s� t —.-�,-��'-?.- .:L:iiiitjt)�la3�t3:i::iii::.�rt:iFtli:�:: ld i.s�::::F'•+•• iLiltlli.t.:...f:i:ia:.. �u Ou s•}'�tii:is•''`tii I -i 1\ 4�C_ +� f'. �;} i$• � (•�.,7 l �C� �.L',�T�.. W�i`�..'Y��,,L� r+''''jib+�"`��F:=r1`�': .E�•sl l --�Z T; 3 s r �J`. V�1��J?•'����.,��. �� W Vex- $ .Ms.ti•t'•'•.Slijy _-11-- � t /11{ 1' 1� � � 1 14gi:!,t••{f,'t: li.it�`:Oirir.; 7: uy-\ tv"� Axl ° .• tT'T�•• •� t a r;.•y s i;z}.•x:°�}!}?.•!•x ;%>• t ;�'• t T i r?},. .;� -�:x+t-f�,...s,,t :►� I,s • • j• :i ,ria r�,x;'.,. ..,_•«n, •.......•.:,.,A•., y...:.. •w;s¢.wJ: ..,.,w•'+-`�-- ...:+aWHtk w.. _. t.,:..a:: rn+^,v:'�+°s,•.••t7✓8a&'�+"kC, ..:,.:, rov�Q, a � �.� � � ,�_ -, ��/T' �� ,i, ��1..�t_�_ .•�\t,.��rti `!.ter `� }�'},_ 7 /� 1 "f 1'�✓ j'� / Mom Of je IN- 72 Z VZ 1 /� '•'/ ��. ���'-L'vL•i.b�t / �� �� l G/�.tC--G: --� S`GL t..�`irG� 44 l :c. -'-` ;��• =f� �.- .. TI , --T wow o:L& h yia Th 10 urn 5bu-;-� ECL O-t -'o U-\ tk\, OAK/Y\,Lkt- 3. tier_ -��<1� j �` 3 1-111l �1�k.A' _ ---�-- /! � 1,1 /1a• , : ,;- , �.c'�, ��. % �-� _ cam--. � �� ��� � � .moi as a3 . - ay as- . -.j� W o.� � o�cQ, h� c�,�v 5 • vr.i Ido y)cj G70 ter,olL 10(A- ,b oaoo ry\-, . �a•o� �"©�`�., Mme-- , ,�.�,c�.'�.� , 13, la• ____ 17, C�a ay ___ ,. .. .. .U ..... ,. rub Y. ,.:... lo .5. C�o. - - ar • _ aa. _ J3 ag• a .Q,� MEMO TO: John Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judi Simac, City Planner RE: Preliminary Plat of Fox Run DATE: March 14 , 1984 Introduction: The Preliminary Plat of Fox Run, consisting of eleven single family lots is being presented to City Council for their approval. Background: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 8 , 1983 on the Preliminary Plat of Fox Run. The purpose of the hearing was primarily for discussion. A staff recommendation had not been made at that point due to the fact that all of the re- quired information had not been submitted to the City. The hearing was continued to January 9 , 1984 . At that meeting the developer delivered the drainage plan and public testimony was taken regarding the development . The hearing was continued to February 9 , 1984 , at which time further drain- age information was needed for a staff recommendation on the plat. By the March 8 , 1984 meeting the developer had submitted the required information and staff was able to provide a case report to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the Prelim- inary Plat of Fox Run 1st Addition subject to the eight condi- tions set forth by city staff in the attached March 1, 1984 case report, with the exception of Condition No. 8 which should be as follows : 8 . A fee dedicated right-of-way from property owners O'Brien and Mau, located in Titus 1st Addition, to the City of Prior Lake for street construction must be submitted for Final Plat. Action Requested: Motion by City Council to approve the Preliminary Plat of Fox Run 1st Addition suject to the conditions set forth in the case report and Condition No. 8, as amended by the Planning Commission Attachment 0. b � MEMO TO: Shakopee Planning Commission FROM: Judi Simac , City Planner DATE : March 1 , 1984 ITEM: Application for Preliminary Plat Approval APPLICATE : Fred Corrigan and John Biwer LOCATION: W 1073 . 93 ' of S � of the NW 4 of 24-115-22 (lying W. of CR 21 ; E. of Pike Lake Road , S . of Horizon Heights and N. of CR 42) ZONING : R-1 Rural Residential LAND USE: Vacant (Proposed Single Family Lots) APPLICABLE REGULATIONS : Section 12 , Subdivision Regulations (Platting) FINDINGS REQUIRED: Section 12 . 03 , Subd . 3 Section 12 . 04 PROPOSAL : The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval of Fox Run . Considerations : 1 . The total area of the site is 32 . 5 ± acres . The existing R-1 zoning will remain . 2 . The applicant is proposing to plat eleven single family lots in the preliminary and then final plat the site into two Lots . An affirmative legal opinion has been obtained regarding this type of platting process . 3 . An acceptable drainage plan has been submitted to and approved by the City Engineer . Said plan has also been submitted to the City of Prior Lake. 4 . The City of Prior Lake has requested the following information : a) Topos at 2 ' contours at least 500 feet south of Fox Run and any other area contributing drainage. b) Drainage calculation and direction of flow for the Vierling property. c) Ponding capacity within the plat of Fox Run and all downstream calculations and capacities to ditch. 5 . Property owners O'Brien and Mau are willing to dedicate a road right-of-way for construction of Fox Run Avenue . The Strand lot would become a corner lot . 6 . Currently Prior Lake and Shakopee have an informal main- tenance agreement for streets and roads which traverse the common boundary. A letter from Prior Lake is on file which indicates that the new streets in Fox Run will be incorporated into the current maintenance agreements . 7 . There are no existing sanitary sewers , stormsewers or watermains . The applicant proposes the use of a septic system, water wells and natural drainage . 8 . The location of the proposed homes , septic tanks and water wells will be determined by City Codes . 9 . If approved , the preliminary plat will be valid for a period of twelve months . Council may further extend the time period by twelve months . 10 . According to the Subdivision Regulations , IO foot drainage and utility easements should be provided around the perimeter of the entire parcel . 11 . Street lighting will have to be provided in accordance with City Codes . 12 . The Park Dedication should be made in cash , payable at the time building permits are issued . 13 . The plat should be renamed to "Fox Run 1st Addition" . 14 . Soil conditions are not appropriate for development beyond eleven lots . 15 . Because this is a rural subdivision , sidewalks should not be required . Staff Recommendation : Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat of Fox Run 1st Addition , subject to the following conditions : 1 . Approval of a Title Opinion by the City Attorney. 2 . Cash payments be made to the city at the time of issuance of Building Permits , in lieu of park dedication . 3 . Execution of a Developers Agreement for the construction of the required improvements : a) Street lighting be installed in accordance with the requirements of the SPUC Utilities Manager . b) Street improvements be made in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer. 4 . Final utility and street plans be submitted with the final plat in accordance with the Engineering Dept . requirements . 5 . Ten foot drainage and utility easements be provided around the perimeter of the entire final plat . 6 . The final plat be renamed to Fox Run 1st Addition . ink 7 . The following information be submitted with the final plat a) Topos at 2 ' contours at least 500 feet south of Fox fun and any other area contributing drainage , b) drainage calculation and direction of flow to the Vierling property c) Ponding capacity within the plat of Fox Run and all downstream calculations and capacities to ditch. 8 . A fee dedicated right-of-way from Titus Ist Addition to the City of Prior Lake for street construction must be submitted for Final Plat . TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator r/{/ FROM: Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director RE: Downtown Concept Plan - Implementation DATE: March 16, 1984 Introduction: The Downtown Committee is now working on the issue of how to implement the Downtown Concept Plan as adopted by the City Council . The Committee is not yet ready to come forward with its plan, but has determined that it would try to develop with Westwood Planning and Engineering and Dick Krier a plan for the scope of consultant services which will be necessary for the first phase of implementation. While negotiating on this issue it has become apparent that one part of the proposal must be considered in advance of the total plan due to weather considerations . Background: Preliminary to drawing up design specifications for any downtown project or even the environmental assessment worksheet for the mini-by-pass , certain basic data must be available. The City Engineer has recommended that orthographic projection would be the most economical way to get the needed information. Westwood Planning and Engineering is working on a proposal to phase the collection of basic data so that it can gradually be provided, as needed. However basic to collecting any data under orthographic projection is aerial photography with certain established ground controls . The optimum time to undertake this activity is in March, after the snow melts, before the leaves come out on the trees , and when the angle of the sun is optimum to avoid shadows . Since the optimum time to fly the project area will occur before a total proposal can be prepared, the Downtown Committee has requested that this element of the proposal be considered by the City Council in advance of consideration of a total package. The City Engineer has stated that the infor- mation provided by photographing this area will be useful to him and others designing facilities in the project area no mat- ter what direction downtown redevelopment takes . For other parts of the City the Engineering Department has been able to sell con- tour maps provided through this process to developers. The proposal from Westwood will be provided to Council when it ' s received. It is estimated that the project will cost in the neighborhood of $750, which can be charged to the Engineering budget under technical services. This expense would eventually be charged to the appropriate improvement project( s ) . Requested Action: Approve contracting with Westwood Planning and Engineering to provide services for aerial flight, ground control and project coordination for the purpose of preparing an orthographic projection of the downtown project area as base data for implementation of the downtown redevelopment plan. i WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY �-- -.,,, March 16, 1984 Mr. John Anderson City Administrator City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: Proposal for Base Mapping Services Dear Mr. Anderson: As requested, we are submitting the following proposal for providing the initial stages of base mapping for the downtown Retail Core. As we pointed out, spring is the most desirable time to perform the aerial photography since the sun angle is high, thereby reducing the length of shadows and also because the heavy snow cover has crushed the smaller vegetation down so that photography and subsequent topography maps are more accurate. To provide the photography, some initial control, and coordination of the flight, the estimated cost is $750.00. Westwood will be utilizing Boerhave Land Survey and Mark Hurd for this base-mapping phase. Once the photography has been completed, it is proposed to provide orthophotos and topographic maps of the downtown area for $3,300; in addition, to provide the horizontal control and additional detail, including building locations, utility locations and topographic detail to the nearest tenth of a foot, for a total of $32,000. The area which would be mapped in detail is from Third Avenue to the river, including the north shoreline and bridge approaches, Atwood Street to Spencer. If the City has been contemplating obtaining base information on other portions of the City, it would be advisable and economical to do that now. To obtain the photography and ground control for the balance of the urbanized portion of Shakopee would be an additional $1,200.00. This includes additional ground control of locating all necessary section corners such that the topography could be married to property lines and descriptions plus the state grid system. Once the photography has been completed, the City could obtain topography maps and orthophotos on an as-needed basis. We hope this proposal meets your needs and, should you have any additional questions, please call. Sincere , \\ WO D PL NNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY ick Lynch Pr'ncipal TA BOULEVARD, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 (612) 546.0155 MEMO TO: Cable Communications Commission FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Review of January Monthly Report by Zylstra - United. DATE: February 21 , 1984 INTRODUCTION: The Franchise Ordinance , Sec . 6 . 01 , provides that the City must approve any revisions to the channel allocations accommodating new programming services . BACKGROUND: Although the December Report only advised of channel revisions within Tier I/ for the record it may be prudent to approve the changes . The Commission should also discuss where to place Channel 29 on the Universal tier . — ALTERNATIVES : a ) Interconnect channel until such time as needed , because this channel is required by law - permitted per MCCB. b) Leased Access Channel until such time as needed , because this channel is required by law - permitted per MCCB. c ) Color Weather Channel - not required by law, so the City could move it to Tier I , making it unavailable to Universal subscribers . d ) Lowest non-reserved channel and give all Universal subscribers a converter. There are only five Universal subscribers at this time. ACTION REQUESTED: 1 ) Receive and approve the December , 1983 Monthly Report moving Channel 15 (HBO) to 23 (AP newswire ) and 23 to 39 ( Cinemerica) and moving Channel 16 (Cinemax) to 24 (C Span) and 24 to 40 (Home Theater Network) all located within the Tier I channel allocations . 2 ) Recommend to City Council that Channel 29 be placed on : a ) Interconnect Channel - Until such time as needed . i Review of January Monthly Report by 7.ylstra - United . Page 2 February 21 , 1984 b) Leased Access Channel - Until such time as needed. c ) Color Weather Channel . d ) Lowest non-reserved channel and give all Universal subscribers a converter . JSC/bn February 27, 1984 Cable Communication' s Commission Recommendation: Da-.-is/Harrison moved to receive and approve the December 1.983 Monthly Report moving Channel 15 (HBO) to 23 (AP Newswire) , and 23 to 39 (Cinemerica) , and moving Channel 16 (Cinemax) to 24 (C Span) and 24 to 40 (vacant) , all located within the Tier I channel allocations. Motion carried unanimously. Harrison/Davis moved to recommend to City Council that Channel 29 be placed on the Interconnect Channel until such time as the Interconnect is needed. Motion carried unanimously. has ® a L istra-Unitcd System SHAKOPEE CABLE TELEVISION MONTHLY REPORT January, 1984 importantThe of Januaryarrelistedcbelow. statistics anyone hasthe anysconmentsaopee (-or que stionssysLemf roto tai�hi �wert c d q c herein, please feel free to contact me personally at either tho Shakopee or Chaska offices. 1 .) Subscriber Levels. As of 1/31/84, the Shakopee system has 1351 subscribers. Of these, 5 are on Universal Service, 391 are Tier I subscribers, and 919 are Tier I1 subscribers. 95 customers have second scat sc.rvi(.e. fh� 1 "ill scribers purchased a tota'1 of 1885 premium services last month. These totals are as follows: HBO 6_'6; TMC 351 ; Cinemax 112; Showtime 462; Disney 203; Bravo 7; HTN 29; and Spectrum 95. There is no installation backlog. 2. ) Access Report . See attachments. 3. ) Stafting Report. No changes. 4. ) Subscriber Complaints/Service -Calls. Shakopee experienced one outage in Jan- uary. On Saturday, January 21 , 1984, service was off from 11 :00 p.m. until 10:00 a.m. in the presidential section. Evidently, a vandal had broken open a breaker box and shut the electricity off. We completed 210 service calls in January. Of these, 23 ware attribu- ted to fine tuning or set problem, 29 to bad splitter or fittings, 42 to converter problems, 8 to bad drops, 6 to parental. locks, 7 to line extender problems, 24 due to headend problems, and 15 each to amplifier and power supply problems. The remaining calls were logged to miscellaneous. 5. ) Programming Changes. The output heads for channels 29 and 41 and the equip- ment necessary to move channels 15 and 16 has not arrived. Jerrold Corp. has informed us that these items should be here in approximately 4 weeks from now. We are at a loss as to why these items are not st.ockcd but they are not. The only other provider, Scientific-Atlanta, indicated the same waiting time. These items were, of course, ordered several weeks ago. Channel 29 continues to present a proble. Our Washington FCC attorney has informed me that we must carry this channel on our lowest tier of ser- vice, i .e. Universal, since the operators have made .a formal toquest . Wc. have been able to Slow this process down while we explored :alternatives because of new ownership of the station and the confusion resulting there- from. The solutions to chis problem are to place 29 on the interconnect channel or the leased access channel until such time as these are needed or to rearrange the channel line-up, substituting 29 on the lowest non- reserved channel and give all Universal Subscribers a converter. this is a matter which should be discussed at the cable board meeting. Finally, you should be aware that channel 48 ARTS, which shares a tran- sponder with Nickelodeon, has merged with the defunct Entertainment channel . N.O. Box 146 9 123 Nest 3rd. St.,Chaska, Mlmwsota 55318 a 1612.1448-383 1 S It is our understanding that Nickelodeon will cut off at 7:00 p.m. now rather than 8:00 p.m. and that the new ARTS and Entertainment programming will run from 7:00 p.m. until 3:00 a.m. So far, no advertising of any kind is avail— able from the combined channel and thus we are not sure as co the upcoming program content. We have made note of these changes on channel 3 and will advise the subscribers more completely when we receive more information. Respectfully submitted, i J.W. Abbott for Shakopee Cable Television 4 r I k i I i i i i I I I Zylstra—United Cable Television Co. Chaska Shakopee Northfield 123 West Third Street P.O. Box 146 Chaska, MN 55318 (612) 448-3831 Shakopee Cable Television Monthly Report December, 1983 As suggested by the Shakopee Cable Commission, I am reinstating the monthly report so that the Cable Board Members may be made fully aware of the status of the cable system. 1 . Subscriber levels. As of 12/30/83 the Shakopee system has 1251 subscribers. Of these, 5 are on Universal Service, 369 are Tier 1 subscribers, and 877 are Tier 2 subscribers. 92 customers have second set service. These 1251 subscribers purchased a total ,of 1765 premium services last- month. ('hese totals are as follows: 11B0 596; TMC 324; Cinemax 103; Showtime 420; Disney 195; Bravo 7; HTN 32; and Spectrum 88. The marketing of. Shakopee continues with emphasis on the outlying areas which have recently been completed and on apartments which have signed pre-wire agreements. There is no back-log of subscribers wating for installation. For more specific information, you may wish to review the weekly reports which are on file with the City Clerk. 2. Access Report. Ser attachments 3. Staffing Report. There are no changes to report . 4. Subscriber Complaints/Service Calls. We completed 151 service calls in Decem- ber compared to 150 in November and 226 in October. This amount is to be ex- pected in a new system. We expect the calls to be fewer as the system matures and as each problem is discovered and corrected. By comparison, Chaska had only 63 calls, a reasonable figure for a system fully operational for a one year period. Of the 151 service calls, 3 wore attributed to fine tuning; problems and 10 other to set problems; 19 calls were as a result of bad split- ters or fittings; 20 calls involved a bad or cut drop; 6 calls involved a headend problem; 2 calls required a cable locate, and the remainder were at- tributed to a multitude of problems too numerous to mention. 5. Programming Chanes. The FCC/FAA have informed us that channels 15 and 16 are causing airport interference problems and must be removed or the decibel le- vels lowered. We have experimented unsuccessfully with the decibel levels and are unable to provide clear audio within the required range. At present we plan to move 15 and 16 to 23 and 24 and to move 23, UPI, and 24, C-Span, to 39 and 40 respectively. We plan to do this on or around th 5th of February so that we can post a notice with the February bills. We have also ordered the neccessary equipment for channels 29 and 41 . We have not made a decision as to what channels these will be carried on. Please note thar after a long struggle, UPI is fully operational and that Satelite Programming Network is be- ing broadcast on channel 49. Finally, you should be aware that Daytime, which 0 programs on channel 28 in the afternoon has combined with the Cable Health Net- work, channel 27, and will be broadcast on channel 27 but will be called "Lifeline." 7. Miscellaneous. 1 . ) The proof of performance is presently being undertaken and the updated maps are in the process of being redrawn for submission to the city. As is usually the case, corrections have to be made where our engineers missed a house, where new additions have been built since original mapping or where a design change was necessary. The updated maps will be furnished as soon as our draftsman can complete the project. 2. ) A recent FCC memorandum opinion and order is attached. The order basically pre-empts local rate reg- ulation of all but that service which is provided to all subscribers. I at- tach this for informational purposes. Respectfully submitted, J.W. Abbott, Manager Shakopee Cable Television f chaska '-N C ble television a Zylstra-United System < •t c. ;'' February 22, 1984 Ms. Judith S. Cox, City Clerk City of Shakopee 129 E. 1st Ave. Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Judy: In a recent telephone converstaion, you asked about cable service to West 3rd Ave. I have thoroughly checked this matter out and find that we are presently un- able to serve three or four houses. Evidently, one individual , subsequently iden- tified as Mrs. Carl Bird, called in sometime ago to request cable service. Our customer service person could not find the residence on the map, erroneously as- sumed that the residence was outside the service area, and so informed Mrs. Bird. At Christmas time, Mrs. Bird called me personally and told me that she wanted cable and wondered when we could serve her. She said that she had been told by a neigh- bor or a friend that she was in our service area. I reviewed our maps and al- though her house and the houses surrounding it were omitted, it seemed to me that she was in the city limits and therefore should have been included. I called Mrs. Bird, explained to her that her area had been overlooked or the mappers had as- sumed the area was outside the city limits, and that we would provide service to her as soon as possible. She stated that she was not surprised that we were un- aware of the area and that the area was often overlooked. To our knowledge, no other person in the area has requested service. Immediately after discussing the matter with Mrs. Bird, I referred the matter to Tony Gauer, our Chief Engineer, and Dan Schieffer, our head technician. They personally inspected the area and prepared a simple diagram for submission to our engineering department. This step is necessary whenever a line extension is built or a new area opened up so that we can be sure that the t.v. signal will reach its intended destination. After being informed that a simple line ex- tension would be possible, we contacted Nothern States Power requesting per- mission to use their poles. NSP requested a sketch of the property for their review so that they could investigate the poles to be used by us. After studying the situation, they stated that we could rent the poles but that two poles would have to be anchored with guy wires for support. The poles themselves are located on an easement granted to NSP, but, the anchors of the guy wires will have to be buried on railroad property. Therefore, NSP will not grant us a permit until we can obtain a permit from the railroad. I do not know if your city utilities people have had to work with the rail- road people or not but I can assure you that it is always a difficult process. we have furnished them with all the sketches and applications required by them and are currently awaiting their reply. They have informed us that it will be at least an additional eight weeks before our permit can be issued. I am attempting to minmize this delay by personally dealing with the railroad chief engineer who is at least receptive to our plight. The problem is, of course, that NSP demands P.O. Box 146 & 123 West 3rd. St., Chaska, Minnesota 55318 • (612) 448-3831 written approval from the railroad. Appropriate railroad officials often give ver- bal assurance that is is acceptable to proceed pending a decision by the final au- thority but in this instance, verbal ok's are not acceptable. I assure you that we are doing all that we can to expedite this matter. If you may remember, we encountered an unmapped area of Presidential Street, and once informed were able to provide service within 48 hours. It is unfortunate that this omission occured but itis understandable if the location of the unserved area is taken into consideration. The area is certainly not easily seen and is not a part of a regular residential area. 1 will continue contacting railroad person- nel in an attempt to expedite this matter. If you have any suggestions re expedi- tion, I would certainly appreciate hearing from you. Vary truly yours, J.hr. Abbott for Shakopee Cable February 27, 1984 Cable Communication' s Commission Recommendations: Williams/Davis moved to inform City Council that the Commission is aware of the situation of no cable service to an area on West Std Avenue , and it is the Commission' s opinion that good faith efforts are being made by ZU to rectify the situation, and they therefore recommend no fine be imposed for this lack of service. Staff Recommendation: Council may desire to concur with the Cable Commission' s recommendation to impose no fine , at this time , but direct that the Council be advised when cable service is available to an area on West 3rd Avenue. �h CITY OF SHAKOPEE INCORPORATED 1870 129 E. First Ave. - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379.1376 (612) 445-3650 « March 16 , 1.984 Mayor Eldon Reinke Shakopee City Council 129 East First Avenue Shakopee , MN 55379 Ladies and Gentlemen : On behalf of the Cable Communication Commission, I would like to submit to you our first Annual Report . Also included with our report is a synopsis of cable activities prior to our conception which we asked to be provided as an introduction to our report . We have enjoyed working on the Commission this past year and thank you for your confidence in us and for affording us the opportunity to serve the City of Shakopee in this capacity . We would also like to thank you for your support of our recommenda- tions . We believe that our job has been worth the time and effort because of your support . We would like to extend to each of you an open invitation to contact any one of us , individually or collectively at a cable meeting, to discuss any matter related to cable T.V. Respectfully/, William Anderson Chairman Shakopee Cable Communications Commission WA/jms T it L 1 cI 1 o P r O t7 r e s s V t7 / tJ An Equal Opportunity Employer 1 { CITY OF SHAKOPEE CABLE FRANCHISE Activities 1980 - 1983, Prior to Formation of Cable Communications Commission The Activities of the Shakopee Cable Communications Commission were prefaced by the following activities in the cable franchise process : May 6 , 1983 City Council adopted Resolution 1600 Establishing an Ad Hoc Cable Communications Committee to advise the Council on the cable franchise process . This resolution was amended by Resolution 1638 to enlarge the size of the Committee and Resolution 1772 to expand the Committee ' s responsibilities and Resolution 2026 decreasing the size of the Committee . July, 1980 First meeting of the Ad Hoc Cable Communica- tions Committee . October , 1980 Committee and City Council submitted applica- tion for the establishment of Cable Service Territory (CST) for City of Shakopee . March, 1981 City Council adopted Resolution 1796 establishing a Uniform Policy regarding communications from Cable Companies . April , 1981 City Council agreed to hire Consultant Anita Benda, CTIC Associates and Attorney Adrian Herbst to assist in preparation of the request for proposals and cable ordinance and to assist in evaluating the proposals . May , 1981 Committee adopted Shakopee Cable Communica- tions Needs Assessment Report . July, 1981 Committee adoption of Request for Proposals (RFP) to provide cable services . August , 1981 City Council review and approval of RFP. December 8 , 1981 Submission deadline for proposals . Two companies , Progress Valley Totalvision and Zylstra-United Cable TV Company submitted proposals . March, 1982 Consultant ' s Preliminary Report on proposals submitted to Committee. { April , 1982 Consultant ' s Final Report on Proposals submitted to Committee . April 27 , 1982 Public Hearing on proposals received held by Committee and City Council at Shakopee Senior High School . May , 1982 Committee determination of findings of fact and recommendation on franchise award. (City Council accepted Committee recommenda- tion June 1st ) . August 10, 1982 City Council awarded franchise to Zylstra- United Cable Television Company by adopting Ordinance 100. September 7 , 1982 City Council reawarded franchise to Zylstra- United to clear up technical problems with Ordinance. September 10 ,_1982 Minnesota Cable Communications Board (MCCB) issued Certificate of Confirmation for Cable System to be effective on date of acceptance. October 1 , 1982 Zylstra-United submitted request for Variance No. 1 to have a joint head-end for the Chaska and Shakopee systems , to be located in Chaska. October 19 , 1982 City Council held Public Hearing on Variance request and moved to deny request . October 26 , 1982 Zylstra-United accepted franchise (contractual agreement ) and began construction. December 30 , 1982 Zylstra-United requested extension on com- pletion of system due to act of God (weather) and City Council extended dead- line for completion of certain underground sections of the system until September 16 , 1983. April 5 , 1983 Zylstra-United and Shakopee School District withdrew proposal to provide cable studio and office facilities at the Shakopee High School and City Council extended the dead- line for having a cable studio facility leased, remodeled and fully operational no later than June 7 , 1983 . April 26 , 1983 Deadline for completion of the system ( for which extensions were not granted) . Zylstra-United was unable to open the system on this date due to technical problems with the computer which addresses the converters home of each subscriber This report is to preface the Annual 1983 Report submitted by the Shakopee Cable Communications Commission. Respectfully submitted , J6✓vvvLv (-tip C�,t.� eanne Andre Community Development Director 1983 ANNUAL REPORT SHAKOPEE CABLE COMMUNICATION COMMISSION Members of the Commission took office and held their organizational meeting on April 11 , 1983. Commission SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION Monitoring construction of the Action initial cable system as provided for in the franchise ordinance. 10/24/83 1 ) Access Studio Facilities - Toured the access studio and reviewed the equipment with the Company. It was noted that some substitutions made were equal to, or greater than, the equipment listed in the proposal . The Company was asked to submit copies of invoices of equipment or a list of the equipment to the City by the end of the year. The Commission recommended to Council that the following equipment be provided in the future when and, if needed, and deemed necessary by the Cable Commission: 1 ) Two Panasonic NV-9100A, 3/4" Video-Cassette Players„ 2) One Panasonic NV-8170, 1/2" Video-Cassette Player, and 3) One Panasonic WV-5203 Triple Monitor (which has now been purchased) . (Council concurred) . 10/24/83 2) Viewing Center - Recommended that the Commission be allowed to designate the location of the viewing center ( in the absence of a Community Access Corporation) and selected the Library as the location of the Viewing Center, with the Library' s concurrence. ZU is to maintain the equipment. (Library Board agreed) . (Council concurred) . 10/24/83 3) Computer Center - 1) Recommended to the Council that the Computer Center be located at the Library (instead of the ZU offices) as requested by ZU, if the Library concurred. Delegated selection of the Computer and software equipment to the Library, 2) The Library 12/19/83 agreed to maintain the equipment. 3) Recommended that consideration be given to the purchase of the Franklin Computer from a local vendor. (Council concurred) (Library Board chose to purchase the Apple IIe) . 4) Penalties - Made recommendations to Council on charging penalties as a result of non-compliance with the Franchise Ordinance. Completion of the initial service area was set for April 26, 1983, extended to September 16, 1983, (because of the onset of winter) and extended again until November 8, 1.983 . When Council extended the completion date until November 8, 1983, they directed staff to invoke a penalty if the system was not complete on November 8th. Page 2 (� Commission v Action 12/19/83 a ) Equipment - On November 9th, the City invoked a penalty for not pro- viding lock boxes , character genera- tions and monitors . The Commission recommended to Council , after these were all delivered , not to penalize the Company because of their earnest efforts in providing this equipment . (Council concurred ) . 12/19/83 b) Interconnect - The City initially determined that a penalty would be invoked for non-compliance of the interconnect by the November 8 , 1983 deadline for the system' s completion, however because the franchise ordi- nance is silent on the completion date for the interconnect between Chaska and Shakopee and because the inter- connect is so near to completion, the Commission determined that it was reasonable to establish a completion date as of January 16 , 1984. (Council concurred ) . Pending c ) System - On November 9th, the City in- vooed—a penalty for non-completion of the system. The Company notified the City that the system was complete on December 29, 1983 , Cable Commission recommendation regarding the penalty will be made in 1984. ONGOING ADMINISTRATION Monitoring the performance and compliance with the franchise ordinance . 5/17/83 1 ) 5% Franchise Fee - Petitioned for Waiver of franchise fee ceiling. The franchise ordinance provides that a franchise fee be paid by the Company beginning at 5%. The City must obtain permission from the Federal Cable Commission to charge more than a 3% franchise fee . Authority by the F.C.C. to charge a 5% fran- chise fee requires the City to use all monies on Cable T.V. with no funds to be used for City opera- tions . Petition was filed in August of 1983 , but no action by the F.C.C. had been taken by year end . 8/22/83 2 ) Access Corporation - Created the Articles of Incor- poration and By-Laws for the Access Corporation. At several meetings , the Commission reviewed samples from other communities in Minnesota and in the United States and subsequently prepared a version for Shakopee and submitted them to Council for approval . After minor changes , Council directed the City Attorney to file the Articles of Incorpora- tion and By-Laws with the State . The City Attorney indicated that filing will be delayed until the initial Board of Directors is named ( to be in 1.984) . Page 3 `1 Commission Action 11/2/83 3 ) Joint Meeting With Chaska Cable Commission - The Commission met jointly wit t e C aska Cable Commission and discussed with a Company Representa- tive , the color weather radar and how Company Staff time and capital equipment are billed when shared by Chaska and Shakopee . A sub-committee was established to work towards setting up a workshop for those who shall be provided institutional network hook-ups . Continual 4) Commission/ZU Relationship - The Commission worked with representatives of the Company in a manner conducive to keeping the lines of communi- cation as open as possible . The Commission feels this is important because of the unusual partner- ship formed by the City granting a private , for- profit company a 15-year franchise using public property, yet retaining authority over how the company operates , thereby forcing much two-way j communication over the 15-year term. EDUCATION The Commission is striving to educate them- I se ves as well as t e Community in the world of Ca e Communications . 5/2/83 1 ) Shakopee Showcase - Commission participated in the Shakopee S owcase to introduce residents to Cable T.V. as well. as Che Community access channels . 5/23/83 2 ) Head-end Facilities - Commission toured the S a opee ea -en , located on CR 16 and received an overview of the facilities . 5/23/83 & 3 ) Franchise Ordinance - Reviewed the franchise 6/27/83 ordnance toce ome familiar with its contents . 11/28/82 & 4) Workshop - Worked towards planning a Workshop to 12/19/83 e ucd ate the institutional network users . AMENDMENTS AND VARIANCES When mutually desirable , t e City may amend the franchise ordinance or grant a variance trom the franchise or inance , when not in conflict wit MCCB or CC requirements or any other— rule therru e or law. 11/30/83 1 ) Variance No. 2 - Recommended to Council , approval of a variance which permits the WCCO color radar service instead of Arvid service listed in the Zylstra United proposal , and allows the service to be installed to serve both the Chaska and Shakopee Cable systems , with equipment to be located in Chaska connected via the institutional interconnect to Shakopee ; subject to the condition that in the event that the signal for three services YL Page 4 Commission Action transmitted via the interconnect from Chaska to Shakopee and used for commercial inserts are lost , then and in such an event , ZU shall be obligated to restore said services within a reasonable amount of time , not to exceed 12 hours , and if such services are not restored in the stated time period , penalties as specified in the ordinance for non-provision of services shall be imposed . ( Council approved 12/6/83 ) . Respectfully Submitted, William Anderson, Chairperson Lillian Abeln, Vice Chairperson Janet Williams Bill Harrison Lee Davis tjLAj& 0 PEE 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CITY COUNCIL FROM: J I M KARKANEN PUSLI C WORKS DEPT, SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF A SNOWPLOW VEHICLE DATE: MARCH 7, 1984 INTRODUCTION ; WE HAVE, THROUGH THE YEARS, RECOGNIZED A NEED FOR SOME TYPE OF SPECIAL EQUIPMENT WHICH CAN BE USED FOR OPENING SNOW PLUGGED ROADS IN OUR RURAL SECTIONS OF SHAKOPEE , BECAUSE OF THEIR GEOGRAPHIC LOCATIONS, THESE ROADS BECOME COMPLETELY BLOCKED DURING HEAVY SNOWFALL AND/OR HIGH WIND CONDITIONS, AND IT GENERALLY THEN REQUIRES SPECIAL EQUIPMENT, SUCH AS A FRONT END LOADER, TO OPEN THESE ROADS FOR TRAFFIC , FORTUNATELY, THIS GENERALLY ONLY OCCURS Z OR 3 TIMES PER WINTER SEASON, BUT IT DOES REQUIRE A SPECIAL EFFORT TO OPEN THEM UP AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BACKGROUND: IN SEARCHING FOR A ONE-WAY PLOW FOR MOUNTING ON OUR GRADER CAS PER OUR 1984 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT BUDGET) WE TRAVELED TO WINDOM, MINN , AND LEARNED OF THE AVAILABILITY OF AN OSHKOSH 4-WHEEL DRIVE, 5 TON TRUCK, WHICH IS ESPECIALLY DESIGNED FOR SNOWFIGHTING DUTIES . THIS TRUCK WAS USED BY THE CITY OF WINDOM, BUT WAS RECENTLY REPLACED BY A NEWER UNIT, AND IS NOW ONLY USED AS A STANDBY VEHICLE. THIS VEHICLE IS EQUIPPED WITH A HIGH V-PLOW, AN 11 FOOT WING, AND ALSO HAS A ONE—WAY PLOW WHICH CAN BE ATTACHED IN PLACE OF THE V—PLOW . BECAUSE OF ITS ' 4—WHEEL DRIVE CAPABILITIES, THIS TYPE OF VEHICLE I,S RENOWNED FOR BEING VIRTUALLY UNSTOPPABLE IN EXTREME WINTER CONDITIONS . THESE TRUCKS ARE GEARED VERY LOW FOR POWER, WHICH LIMITS THEIR ROAD SPEED, AND THE BOX IS SIZED ONLY TO CARRY BALLAST, THUS MAKING THEM NOT VERY FUNCTIONABLE FOR CARRYING GRAVEL OR OTHER NORMAL TRUCK DUTIES . THIS TYPE OF TRUCK WAS USED BY GENE •11AUER FARMS, AT ONE TIME, WHEN THEY CONTRACTED WITH OUR CITY AS A SNOWPLOW CONTRACTOR ON OUR EAGLE CREEK:' ROADS . GENE HAUER LATER TRADED HIS TRUCK FOR A GRADER SO HE COULD PERFORM SUMMER MAINTENANCE WORK ON THE .JACKSON AND LOUISVILLE TOWNSHIPS AS WELL AS SNOWPLOWING IN THE WINTER , THIS TYPE OF TRUCK WAS -ALSO USED BY BOHNSACK AND HENNEN CO . OF PRIOR LAKE, WHEN THEY CONTRACTED THE SNOWPLOWING FOR THE EAGLE CREEK TOWNSHIP BOARD, � IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT OUR FORD TANDEM TRUCK DOES MOST OF THE SNOW- PLOWING IN THE EAGLE CREEK AREA, AND WE WOULD INTEND TO USE THIS OSHKOSH TRUCK ONLY TO SUPPLEMENT THE SNOWPLOW SERVICE IN THIS AREA WHEN OUR TANDEM CAN T GET THROUGH SOME OF THESE ROADS, WHICH HAPPENS OCCASIONLY , THE ONE-WAY PLOW, WHICH WE ORIGINALLY WENT TO INSPECT, CAN BE MOUNTED ON THE TRUCK IN PLACE OF THE V-PLOW, OR CONVERTED TO FIT ON THE FRONT OF OUR GRADER (WHICH WAS OUR ORIGINAL INTENT) AND STILL BE ALSO USED ON THE OSHKOSH TRUCK, THIS TYPE OF TRUCK IS CONSIDERED A HIGH MAINTENANCE VEHICLE FOR PARTS AND REPAIR BECAUSE IT IS A SPECIALIZED PIECE OF EQUIPMENT . THE CITY OF WINDOM DOES HAVE APPDXIMATELY $4000 IN PARTS WHICH WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE SALE , WHEN WE TEST DROVE THIS VEHICLE, WE WERE IMPRESSED WITH THE CARE THAT WAS APPARENTLY GIVEN THIS TRUCK, AND THE VEHICLE WAS IN GOOD CONDITION FOR ITS AGE , THE ENGINE RAN SMOOTHLY WITH GOOD POWER, AND THE TRANSMISSION AND DIFFERENTIALS DID NOT INDICATE ANY ABNORMAL WEAR , IN ADDITION, THE VEHICLE HAD BEEN RECENTLY REPAINTED. AGAIN, WE DONT INTEND TO USE THIS VEHICLE ON A DAY TO DAY BASIS, BUT WE ARE CONFIDENT THAT IT WILL DO THE JOB FOR US AS INTENDED, AFTER INSPECTING THE VEHICLE, WE CONTACTED THE CITY OF WINDOM AND BEGAN NEGOTIATIONS WITH THEIR STAFF ATTEMPTING TO REDUCE THEIR ORIGINAL SALE PRICE OF $ 5000 FOR THE TRUCK, THEY HAVE FINALLY AGREED TO SELL THE VEHICLE AT $ 4500, BUT THEY WILL HAVE TO AMMEND THEIR ORIGINAL RESOLUTION TO LOWER THE SALE PRICE TO MATCH OUR OFFER IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE SALE, PROVIDED THAT WE RECEIVE COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR THE TRANSACTION . IN ORDER TO PAY FOR THE VEHICLE, WE CAN USE THE $ 2000 WHICH WE HAVE BUDGETED FOR THE ONE-WAY PLOW, AND WE CAN USE PART OF THE $ 3000 THAT WE HAD BUDGETED FOR CONCRETE CURB FORMS IN OUR 1084 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT BUDGET, AT THE MOMENT, WE HAVE NO NEED FOR THE CURB FORMS BECAUSE OF THE SUCCESS OF THE CURB AND SIDEWALK REHABILITATION PROGRAM WHICH WAS INITIATED IN 1983. IF COUNCIL CHOOSES NOT TO PURCHASE THIS VEHICLE, THEN WE WILL CONTINUE TO FIND ANOTHER ONE-WAY PLOW FOR $ 2000 , HOWEVER, KEEP IN MIND THAT FOR THE ADDITIONAL $2500, WE WILL RECEIVE A V--PLOW, WING AND TRUCK IN A PACKAGE WHICH CAN HELP US IN EMERGENCY SNOW SITUATIONS , ACTION REQUESTED ; REQUEST COUNCIL APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE US TO PURCHASE THE OSHKOSH 4-WHEEL DRIVE TRUCK WITH V-PLOW, ONE-WAY PLOW AND WING, WITH FUNDING FROM THE 1984 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT BUDGET, FROM THE CITY OF WINDOM FOR $ 4500 , 9C- TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre, Community Development Director RE: Huber Park Trail Restroom DATE: March 16, 1984 Introduction: The City of Shakopee has an existing contract with the Consolidated Plumbing and Heating Company to construct the Huber Park Trail Restroom Facility. Due to problems with an existing watermain at the proposed site, City Council was previously informed about the need to reconsider the proposed site and possibly cancel the existing contract to get a better price on building the facility at a new site. Since that time numerous meetings and significant research by the engineering department has occurred to suggest the most appropriate direction to take with this project. Background: Meetings on this project have included George Muenchow, Leroy Houser, Lou Van Hout, Ed Leaveck, Ken Menden, Fulton Scheisman, Bo Spurrier, John Anderson and me. The ongoing discussion has led to a preferred solution to present to the City Council . For Councils information I will outline the precedure followed. A meeting was held at which six alternatives to resolve the site problem were suggested. Fulton Scheisman was then directed to research these alternatives to determine the cost and feasibility of each alternative. His report was brought back for a second meeting to select the preferred alternative. The alternative selected was to leave the building more or less as originally sited with the watermain relocated at an estimated cost of $ 6 , 060 . However because there were some unresolved issues about this alternative, Fulton was requested to clarify these additional points : 1 ) Stake the proposed site so that George and Ed could feel comfortable that it would work aesthetically and physically avoid existing utilities be- sides the watermain; and 2 ) Order soil borings to determine if it would be better to relocate the watermain to the north or south of the building, depending on the location of bedrock. All existing utilities were located and it was judged that a site which places the front of the restroom even with the front of the Community Services Building and 50 . 5 feet from its southeast corner will work. (See attached map) . This site will allow for the watermain to be relocated ten feet north of the building and avoids other utilities and the existing cedar tree. Ed Leaveck is checking to see if one of the electrical guide wires can be moved further east to dis- courage kids who might choose to take this route to climb to the roof of the restroom, creating an additional nuisance and liability to the City. With the more detailed information Fulton was able to prepare a more detailed estimated cost of relocating the watermain at $5, 900 . SPUC staff have maintained that because this watermain is in reasonable condition this relocation is necessary purely for park purposes and it is therefore recom- mended that the additional cost be charged against the park reserve fund. SPUC is also considering the elimination of a water manhole near the site which has obsolete fittings and valves . However it is agreed that this work would be done at their initiation and cost if it is to be ordered. If the City Council decides to go forward with the recom- mended site, the next decision is to determine the best way to contract to get the job done. The current contractor was in- formed that the Council might wish to cancel the current con- tract due to the likely resiting of the building. The con- ractor submitted a bill in the amount of $4 , 607 . 34 for costs incurred to date to be paid if the contract is cancelled. Al- though some of these costs could probably be contested, now that the building is back at the original site the added cost of many small change orders can be avoided, and it is suggested that the existing contract be continued . The remaining decision is how to handle the relocation of the watermain. Since it is a project that can be completely separated from the building construction it does not need to be handled as a change order, although that is one alternative. Alternately the City could take quotes from other contractors . approved by SPUC and the City Engineer to do such projects (possible for projects under $15 , 000 in value) or prepare specifications to formally bid the project. Due to problems coordinating two contractors and separ- ating their liability for problems which come up, Engineering has recommended that the City try first to negotiate a change order with Consolidated, anticipating they will be able to gain some economy of scale by doing both projects . However if their quote is not reasonable the City could still take quotes from other contractors and not execute the change order. Advertising for bids is not recommended due to the small size of the project and the extra time involved in a full bidding process . In addition to the above discussions on the restroom facil- ity I also introduced at our meeting the question of whether an additional landscaping project could help to tie the new facility into the existing Community Services building, obscure some of the intrusions and beautify the area in keeping with the pro- posed trailway. Steve Hurley will investigate this issue and another memo will be coming to you in April . Requested Action: Approve the siting of the restroom (as noted on the attached map-) even with the front of the exising Community Services Build- ing and approximately 50. 5 feet to the east, and direct staff to secure a change order with Consolidated Plumbing and Heating for the relocation of the watermain on the proposed site, said change order to be presented to the City Council for approval. rlmD j' ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS • 8421 WAYZATA BOULEVARD o MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55428 (612) 546-8972 • INWARD WATS — 800 + 552-1158 PROJECT �Gt hPr i. ►"QI r \ESddrrt /-IGif/ 7�y DATE 3 AV 1! 1 • F "V - .. ._. »..__.._._.. ........._._' -_.Y..-... 'I> 1 a!� � ;` tit �/� ► l ^ ' S s A N, m A rt ZA C�il _ N / n to IP" N o cr► S � 1 \ � 1 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Computer Task Force RE: Computer System Selection DATE: March 14, 1984 Introduction Following the evaluation of nine computer systems ranging in price from $23, 000 to $30 ,000 the Computer Task Force was unanimous in selecting a system for the City. Background: After initial and subsequent reviews seven of the nine systems were eliminated from further consideration. Those seven were systems manufactured by the following companies : Columbia Data Products Corona Data Systems Texas Instruments Radio Shack Victor Technologies Data Point Corp. Digital Equipment Corp. Of the seven, one is sold locally by RJ Computers but did not meet all the criteria established by the Task Force . Final consideration was given to two systems , one from a well established and respected firm, IBM, the other from a relatively new company, Stearns Computer Systems located in the Twin City metropolitan area. Stearns was selected over IBM because of superior networking capability, processing speed, cost and other criteria while at the same time providing virtually the same software availability, a known vendor offering support , training, and maintenance and communication compatibility with LOGIS , Scott County and Police . The system cost of $22 ,895.00 is based on a proposalsreceived not on bids taken and even though modifications will occur that cost will not be exceeded in the initial purchase . However, as the City has realized with the HP125 microcomputer located in Finance , as experience is gained and new demands are made on the system other hardware , software , and supplies will be needed. As much as possible new growth will follow the City' s plan for building a newtworked system of microcomputers able to access a common data base , share printers and other peripherals and provide a cost effective means of creating the necessary work product . Mayor and City Council G Computer System Selection /t March 14, 1984 Page -2- As the groupings on the attached page indicate the equipment will be purchased by types from various vendors which maximizes our savings and therefore doesn' t require competitive bids under state or local law. The Police Department has budgeted $9 ,000 and the Engineering Department $12 ,000 in 1984 (General Fund ) for computer_ equip- ment . The other expenditures will come out of the Administation Department ( Revenue Sharing money) . Administration will need a budget amendment in the near future when other revisions are made . Recommended Action: Authorize the purchase of the proposed computer hardware , software and maintenance , micronet equipment and printers from Office Products of Minnesota and Tele-Terminals as listed on the attachment dated 3/15/84 at a price not to exceed $22 ,895 . 00 . SH: cah Attachment 3/15/84 STEARNS PROPOSAL Computer Hardware ( 1 ) Stearns 20Mb $ 4 , 796 .00 ( 2 ) Stearns dual floppy 4 , 792 .00 ( 1 ) Stearns tape backup 1 ,200 .00 ( 1 ) Start up supplies 100 . 00 Training and Installation 300 .00 11 , 1�$.0� Software and Maintenance ( 3 ) Operating system software @ $32 .00 Ea . $ 96 .00 ( 1 ) Data base manager software NIC ( 2 ) Word processing software @ $396 .00 792 .00 ( 1 ) Financial spreadsheet N/C ( 2 ) Asynch communications software @ $156 .00 Ea . 312 . 00 ( 1 ) Micronet software & concurrent DOS 960 .00 ( 1 ) Micronet software ( 1 pkg for both workstations ) 400 .00 One year on-site maintenance 1 , 759 . 00 _4_,3.19. 00 Micronet Equipment ( 1 ) ( 2 ) Dual channel communication boards @ $360 .00 $ 1 ,080 . 00 ( 2 ) Hayes Smartmodems w/cable @ $540.00 15080 .00 ( 1 ) 256K Memory expansion 560 .00 Micronet cable 80 . 00 Micronet installation 150.00 Printers ( 1 ) Okidata Micro 84 Dot Matrix Printer $ 1 ,400.00 ( 1 ) Tractor Feed 150 .00 ( 1 ) NEC 7715 L.Q. Printer 2 , 119 . 00 ( 1 ) NEC Tractor Feed 300 . 00 ( 1 ) NEC 7715 Word Processing Option 469 .00 Total System Cost : $22 ,895 . 00 *To be purchased later for communication with the Police Department . MEMO TO: John K. Anderson FROM: Gregg Voxland RE: Personnel Policy Amendment DATE: March 15, 1984 Introduction & Backround The recent suspension without pay of a city employee revealed that neither the Personnel Policy nor the Union Contracts specifically address the issue of benefits during the suspension. A check with another City with recent suspension experience, the League and Labor Relations provided little guidance. The issue was discussed at a staff meeting and the consensus was that for a suspension without pay that is longer than one pay period, there will be no leave (sick & vacation) accumulation but the city will continue to make its contribution to the group insurance package. For suspensions of less than one pay period, there will be no forfeiture of benefits. Alternatives 1. Continue all benefits. 2. Cancel all benefits for the length of the suspension. 3. Cancel all benefits for suspensions in excess of one pay period. 4. Cancel leave accumulation for the length of the suspension 5. Cancel leave accumulation for suspensions in excess of one pay period. Recommendation Alternative 5. This is the consensus reached at the staff meeting and avoids the minor adjustments to records required when a suspension is less than a pay period. Action Requested Move that staff prepare a resolution modifying the Personnel Policy to reflect the cancelation of leave benefit accrual and that there is no change in the City's group insurance contribution , during a suspension without pay in excess of one pay period. GMV/pmp MEMO TO: John K. Anderson FROM: Gregg Voxland RE: Sewer Bill DATE: March 15, 1984 Introduction & Background Dave Rutt is remodeling a house at 630 E. Fourth. He said no one has been living there since February 1983 but he is being charged for sewer. He would like to have the sewer charge dropped and a refund. S.P.U.C. related that he took over the account and had the utilities turned on in January 1984. The water is still on and he is being billed the minimum of $4.00 per quarter. Because he is new at this account, he is being billed the average $8.70 per month for sewer. It has been past practice to cancel sewer billing only when the water is turned off. Alternatives 1 . Cancel sewer billing until usage starts. 2. Bill at service charge portion of sewer rate which is $3.00/month until usage starts and then revert to average of $8.70/month as per policy. 3. Refund sewer billing to January, when Mr. Rutt took over account. 4. Refund March 1st billing which was the current bill when Mr. Rutt called. 5. Continue billing at $8.70/month which is current policy and practice. Recommendation The recommendation is to refund $5.70 for the current billing and set the charge at the $3.00/month service charge for an account that is connected but has no usage. Action Move to refund $5.70 sewer service charge to Mr. Dave Rutt and set his sewer bill at the $3.00 per month service charge until usage increases. GMV/pmp r to N Y Y Y Y N N N U U U Y Y I 1 1 1 U U Co , N • • • Q Li S v a ac 1 • �1 IJ a M •. U 3i M • M 7 N J ►NNN NN N ►NM Nh OC r KI -P, M w ^ I t 1 1 J J ► r►r ►r►M M 46 ► M y n N • r►•�.O► 1 1 1 I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 / / O M J••NNM rrr w^ ,. 7 O JMMJ 'O .!J .- ►►Mrr• MM V r wN1d w N w^ 1 O N N N N II 1 1 / 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M J w•� 00 O r•-► 1 Z M r M M M,M ►•-r►r r r r 1 1 1 O N N N I V N N r M N N I n Yv N N f n N N N N N C ✓ O O N N M M M M M M M M M M M w r O J JJJJ) J V J J V JJJ.a JJJJ MM N N MM U 1 r r► .1- 1 c G G GOGO C:G P OOOU C—)—0 w � O O O C, G p Lf lu W 1.1 L� n craora • 7 H O aE m N M eD N H . . • . • V Vj W W •-. Z 7.'�. 7 7 • U U r) a /n Y I S W W W LI W 10 LI W W LI W 1,1 a 7 S LI V1Li •a 77 2772 7_ 77 7 1 fY [� • LI • . W W 0000000000_ O_ O W Ll L!W "' - J x722ZS 222 NN = H J4 d !] n JJ W n. 0 n n. an. o. 2 n x �• tl 6j -I ^ _ .,' a n W W W W W W W W W 111 W W J a d 4 O G O O n C j j cr J J J J J J J J J J J J n oc p p LI 01.1 1.1 I'l „I N N W W W W W f.f W W L1 W W LI GD cr tr z H fM W J J J J ) N a n nn. an 1- ne� aaa zz z u Y 7 7 G 7 G O C O G t-' 0 N N N fn N fn N p Li = 7 JJJJ J W W 1 1 •ti a .c a a a W W W G S 2222 Z o a a t_� u m,T U Z L'W W W L' • • O p • • I 4 LL Y •- F 1- r i- H N/-- N F � N V' � LI .r O O O O O J J 2 rn I.I 1.f 7 1- 1- 1.- ►- 1- 2 �; •Lb Ma8dNetfb•d eE 1- ►- J a 27 _ •e ee a a K GG> > � a a O N F- ►- •-H1+1-1- t—/- ►- r- Ji �' a aaaaa WW y a •raaaaaaaa G O O C1 CC UMN rK' OAA OO kr '01O N%C J 'O.0 NK J or NCN C+[ OI1C • • • • • • • --, • • •V` M M N'.C f'r. N J P o •-r N.O'O 0,fC �C J NP ►•- rr ^NrMMr NSA x r� OC: NN AN 7 r- .0 ti i w N ^^ aC of 'C C) ^ n 7 a J J J J V J .• v � C O G w G or Y [. Y /C a IC v or or ar jc v d \ \ \ \ \ Or cr Y � � � •�„ � � d � d b J�T J J J J J J 1 �t �! d J J J I' N � ✓� K n K K M M M Y' P-'% ao o c c c c c • 0 0 c C1ao.o e 'o a . . a . ry ry L n,. • NNrthn • r\ n • M • JJ V �t JJJ 1Jd 1 .t • to • .p ,\A L t.) • ']7 !] J C) • r' CS J • ♦ C\t]OJ OJ,Od OJOJ.GJuCl U b • C' O U A ♦ Cc A A \ A • A A • A A ^ A'iA \\ P A A \ A • A • J • 1 J '- C' • 0OC C a C LU i C • OCC C 'O 0CT GC: C C.' • O • p pp N y Y Y y y y V) y y u U Y Y Y X Y Y W a LI i d � •o 1 d p M •' N Ci i P •n M • co d J n 00 2 M P N m N W m..N M r N r N Nr d •�•- ..MMMd dO °' M NN N P M M • ter' r •- •-NMS r-�•.� •- t 1 1 1 . 1 2 Nr •O.D CO 00•.NMr.N N M NNN• 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O O O O M M M W. M M)M M N i M M MMM M N M N N N N N N O d d d d d d d d d d d d d J d Q C' G 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O C C C 7 0 0 0 R L' n 7 cr 1.1 n ly VIV. W T (n A m r W W a uu u W r• r►. •r a U 7 7 z l� tY ❑: R_ W L R W 6,W W W 61 1.1 L W rc 4 H r n L I L I U U U U U U U U U U U' y W 67 i N N y a L I y N y Z 7 2 Z z z Z Z z z 2 la CA n .x .raaaaa cera .� ►. .r . H.. Z W U. C) nRG. 0 1.1 o n o (A M (A y m y y lA y to rr 9L n n -f 2 a n. n r 2 2 z 7 2 M 2 2 Z 2 a K 7 O 7 a 7 J rc t. a~ V) • 1.1 H K U F Y 4 > > Y T > > > T >• Y y 4, U = = K u u U U U u U U U u J �n uu R ?: zczzzz — z W W W W W W W W W W C� H O p J W W • l% t7 M L L^ o C: L CO u' 2 3 2 2 C -� •� • C O T 7 T T D • • cr yy ut V)y(A V)V)V)y • 7 a U vlv :77 7� 77 » » U p 7c IAyyy &A fA fA(A(A f.H H H►. 7 H y 2 2 i 7 Z 'J LI 1.1 d N IA IAN<A IA(A y rA IA ►. A "fr Z la; W Ll L,W Ll 41 W W Ll L. r ►• w T ae aK 0 0 0 G as a aa ❑ a C J C) >C + z ►"•-' O caa caccaa d O 7 7 7 0 O O u u U u u u u u u u u 1-' U 0 O u O p t M d.to A O •-A .p h V)M 0.O.O V.a) .p .0 to or n M P O• o O O O 61.- %r, Q�GY rK NNC C):.:1 d :C7 J d K M M. O tr N M r .-h d r .L1 d d d .-•- V1 N ^Y M M. d d C� V• u• M ID a) y,u` M r M •� r, e- N N a GC a' O" a •r n' M wT Or a EC K Kor or v or x ss s sas sssdss .s d s s s s s .rss M- Y' M M M M M M.N' Y` M Ir ✓` M: M M M M V V C' y N N • �J • Nn n n. n. ti N N r. • 1 • Q. i'o • �' • U h h • '� • b OC M oC Y, d Y �0.0 X • 't cY+ • pQ. ♦ C c. r. G] b • O • • • M Y M S d J • d • J d d d J V d d d d • J •. d • i J ♦ �t • �t • .t V V 1 L) f� h • �. • A. h 1. A. A 1� h A A h � ' OC • G • f h. •; h • 'h • 1� • h G C C C G C��C C G C: • O' • C • C • O • C • C C O'O M Y Y N N N U C) U U Y Y Y N to N 41 1 1 1 1 C) V U Y >C Y w a i � • ♦ � t 1 1 U V a w • . • 1 • I i a M h. L., r .0 N A O r • N MI !\ M .Zr d Mr N N �� rNNNN r 1 t 1 1 M MM, Z M M �r MM�1 •O\ n N N N ~ N p 0 N 7 ry r r M 0 0 0 0 O p N p Of N N O N N N N U 1 1 1 J J.14'r J v Q O O p O O U C O O O U CCt 0 0 U i • I i.l a n a W 1.7 W W L1 W W I•i bl H m Q R Q t f a Q o • � a ae a fra . .+ N �' aseaeea F a V.V) V)N N 0 1.1 1, W 1.1 V) LI W W W W W W i VI a C Ll H 1-f HHHHH N Z i O �Jw CI • ti F-l- ~.-�� • •-. L1 N fl H J H H H N—M H z o i.l l'- a n 2 J J J J J J JCL V) > >> >>>> C3 M L.1 VI O A OC N IJ LJ V1 l9 LIIt. Y • ¢ n'i UCJUUVUCI YY CI 7 2 2 2 7 2 2 Q Q O w ? N 2 z ? 2 2 z z z cr cn = = z N �ILD ocl00000 w V • • >. Li fr U 7 G 0 • a s .a a . a .! a S = = n o n u 1. 7T tr. 2' 2222222 N cy W S u a .• h v, cn f J F V IANN VI fA(nfn LI Y nn H Lt 4 a s y tY Z 7 1 7 T .T S O.. m Z �- n J ►. ell •a•t a& oN at tl p a .1 w W W L) 4L 00D000Ot aQ r c fa 7 = _ 00 K,V• K �} S N{N Od0000Jd Ir Iror • • • • • • • V K V• • • r• f` �T 'N �^ J J tr � `G V.�ll"'� N M f^n 1.., J J f�l� N v.NNNNOG�t NN N V n N C � •- C7 r N S r.- O v \ cr K u rY tr 1. tr a ` ar a J oror a n 7 r7 (7 I] C U • r • J J • • N • r r r.-pie- •- ♦ !Ln ♦ G: L i ♦ • _ _ 'r • ♦ b u0 00 00 CC!JO W • oC ♦ C. • 41, v • D• .. c t • � ♦ ti � V • v J'..t v�.T Int V • '.t • .1 r p N • • t\ • \ • A \In A ti f\ V • v • • G, • C..O • r.+ ♦ C r G O'O C Olt>G - i f` • ~ • A r. ♦ . O ♦ 0 •. OO �i O . • < r v � a `v e a :-, r r. r.: i : n a i n o c � o G n s a o r, • n r V5 cm yy V1 i J Y V5 Y Y 1 Y ! Ic I Y I Y u uILI (W� W a • • • • •� i i 1 1 / .2 N • ♦ •i I♦ • I • I I • a = � ', I i • fI •� 00 i 1 • I 1 a. ev M M N A • N IO O, M hl 2 N h•-•M �•-•. 00 LPN Lf%In 1-s �c •-M n J J — J r O N N N! • O rNr �.A d / 1, t 1 f 01 1 II II z 'd •-114 M �O N O OG N 1A In IN 0 I N •" 1 1 1 1 / i 1 ^ J •-•- •- A � d I M i O NNN 000 p N 1 1 1 •' M MMM r r M M 00 tq 00 J O O I Oi O N NNN MMM N N M M M p M iM NI O J J J J J J J 1 J J H J J J 4 O 0 0 0 Q NIA C7 O f r •- r, � I ••; D o c o0 0 0 0 • aae a I.1 W 1.1 �W K a a T � ad•D•C � b N I 'l7 • • • W 1.1 W • O e] m a • /-►- ► u u u • 1- M D a cr z N d f Z W e' K •+ .-. N = W W W i W = N N/n = to 0 W n >> > n O q 1•' J Aa C+ K a Q' n3p Z 3r NJ ti WWW m bW j 1 i.1 a 0 Ca CL W' K I ¢ ¢. CL O y. a' F N fA C9 L. U' Q' n O n N►+w J IX 0: zzz N c Y d 4 a V, T z u CJ 0 0 d •1 .t J N O M 1.1 2 � d W t• U In(/1 n 1.1 1.1 1./ n � d O N N N 161 1,1 1.1 Z N z_ = S = CJ C OC H y 7 41 7 2 2 N M CA t o d 2 47 W W a a 4 2 2 •'�~ d Y •� IJ G O: IV O UC, O O G O •-/ O \ S YYY Y Y Y Y J J J J J J J i 00 O VN OI^ OOIn 61 C.O OC) ^ r`. MA MLrl O O O D J J �Lrl �O J r.Ir. an 7 .G NN Mr. 1/�PN r r•- rIr MN 1 J •'• 10 A A er r.A r.M Mr. Npe p. r J J MH ... NN i a ' I .t .t 4 ao a c er a. a r a or or x a •- cr or o V J ^ Jv .t J J Z W \ \\ \ \ \.\r. \ \ \\\ 1 ►- M r M.M N r r 11 7 7.f'' '7 7 J O n 1 O -- O O O 7 O 7 O O - > de C Y r • A + ' u' r • ,p.c 1O • AO P ti # -- " h'. • h A IA • .- + r/`. t IA + •i Wa0'I ♦ PPc* I♦ O • O • 'o .t N • N n ti • NNN • N • N • pi NiN t M' t r J • J J J ♦ J J d ♦ -.J • Ji • tl J ♦ J • J • !J • J' • ? U� A •'. AAA ♦ AAA • !A • A. Y� hh.P'. i f� ♦' h • A I• h • C • .P I• OI • •i •. r. r, r 1 .C_a.!• r c ¢ ¢ ice c° o n n n � • n N I � I W 4 W U u u IY • • t j� V UI N • • - • d = j •. J M 4 AA o a '^ •c OO N N h �► M O 2 w w N N onC• ►+ M V J Ih O M N N'N N N N rV J N w N NIN M, • N w,O �. 1 =1 a l,01 �. M _ O A I t / ^ 1 1 1 1: 1 N N ONO MM w w .0 wN,0 N',w 1 1 / M O MJ w,O,O N NNNJ N•.NM�.M i PM IOI i 1 • M VJJdQOMJJO •. MI z M M M n 'O '� O O p Op 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 w N A A h A h w O O O O O N N N,N w ww/+1MK)WN O OI O' NNN M N P M M MMM y� rV N N N NN N NIN N' w' O v J J J J V d J J J JFn U 1 1 1 i 1 1 I t 1 1' 1 J J.tV JJJJ J:J y. MI 'a OOU O O 00 OG 000 O Ci00 C OOOOp O. • • n_e a W 1.1 r Ir cc bl N N a 4 a 4 O' • • C E Q '1.1 LJ 1.1 1.1 2 b b •O 1-- N • • f.7 C7 C7 K K W Cf O N 2 F►- U U ♦ • • • • • • • .a •a •a +a •. a � F„�• W 1.1a, Li Ll ►+ .19 < a Q N U Z 7 Z =O 2 Z Z Z a N Srr as N z Ntn NNN W aQQC •a �' IJ LI U Hw WWW 1 NN NNNSirs O 4' O • • • J .--1 •"1~~ J W W W W W = Ll ►- b 0 C" K a Z •r r.l .� w r•I M Q a a 4 4 r�-,1..,,.p.. z 1{. V h N N N N W W 4l 1.1 d 4' ILo 4 I I W LI y ti.r►/ N UU O re �� • • • �� W 1.1 5 W .1 Jr h`H 4 J J w 1•' Z O O Cl 1.1 1.1 • C: N tL 4. a1 C7 pf (n V) rA n M rJ O 272 Q W JJ UUU .-. 1.. ►- - /^4..H �. �. s. _c o0o O 2 arra xo _ J J N N N Q� K C K U' a c J 4 4 2 4 4 n 4 4 a F =I !:.p W 1.1 1.1 L1U' U' U' q Y Y Y Q J • 1.11.11.1 N KNrK r✓rrK K N N hl J J J 1 J 2 Z 7 2 2 2 O !7 0 0 0 0 0 O p p 4 a 4 31 •.. r-. 72 7 z7 1-1- •-/- ►..p.►. w N Wi s s i s 27 = = z ra = s r of 1 w100M OO V,N MM h rvP MV• 'oJ V"N 1n 1na t^V, ,O ,OwNM u',1/1 O d V aA � 0. wr r-.L-. n. � M. ^ • • • • • • • •O ^• • • •O • •i 1. =•' LIN NN 1/ to Q O ,6 V 'wh w h / ry P NN V MP C'wP NN {n P'N M O O NI 7 ^V N N w IA M it LesI O i S v I 1 oC a s tx aC M d V \ d V ` rad' o xocaaceca or as 4, w w w � ' w w w .- •- d�- w w w w V V � d :7 7 r� O C-� ri .� rJ 7 r7 0 0' M M M M MMM M,,/•1 M M, O 00 00000 C I I i U w ♦ N • r • M r •'�., MMM • J I ♦ d J V y 1 N l`0 ♦ °pI P LI M M.M. M ♦ M ♦ M • ✓1 M, • MMM • M .t d 1 J J _ VVV V • y • w ♦ ,MIMM MI.M MMM, ♦ M. M V, A:ti ^ ^ ♦ J di •i V J d • d ♦. d Vd J J:'V V diy • d. J CI'C L O • Y \ • ^ ♦ h \ \ h A I\ h n..h I♦ A ♦; H. hA C • C, ♦ C O, •'. C't,�p • O' •' O 0 C G G O O G IG • pI p � I afi N fyel 1/1 � fXI�iI V • i � /: ' 1 1t i U j IV 1 I t O W • 00 � • I J O 1 a M } r 2 AIr tel .-NMN (. 110Mr NM,r NP NMM .-M.- ,p N f"'r r,M MJ 'p rr rr rr NM MMJJr- rr•- MMJ V „f 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 / • 1 . 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 . 1 1 1 • • I 1 • r'N.-W r rrrrrNrr r♦-,rrr •�•�rrrr •. P I it O A,r MNM •FNM^'.ti ODMf-NM.•.N0, NM^ rMr ,p N 2 r M M V 1O r r r r r N M M 1- N%IV NNN rre-•-rr. M M Mr•..rr.,rrr NN NO N' NN u1 O I N� 2 M' .M N N N N N N N N N N N N N M MM M M d1 •,. I r M O N N N N N M M M M.M1 M 1+1 M M M M M11+1 N N N N N N O JJdV J JJJJV V VJd V d�IJ JJJ JJJ d d J .�I U r r r r r r Z r r7r•-r 0.- r r'.r r M •-•- "t 00000 I OOC. 000OCOOr i I 41 LJW CaaaWWa R•: QKKK tYan'w tr er ar- T , O od rd •- • • • • • to VI 4 F F • • • • • • W W • ►' 22222 ►-►- r.1-/-... cr HHHfN.-• 222222 H H.-.. .-•H H S A S f.r U r Q Q T Q LI W W W W W W W W W LI W W < Q Q Q Q Z = K Q N = = z = ?7722227722z7 Z =._ X z w W tC� W 0000'000000000 to N O • • • • • 7 2 2 2 2 2 = S S S S '1' _ I • W n Ilaa ar • • • • • e aaaaan. aaaaaa, a a i HHHHH W W/J W IJW LI Cf»7 O W j W W.W W W: a,..� a a s 1L LL H M'H H Ha... JJJJJJJJJJJJ1 >:3 mm>m n 1.1W1.1 ~ O O G7 a0 1.1 W IJ 1.1 W W LI 1.1 W W1.1 W W O�!O D O C n O d. t3 �•+ W W 1.1 W ►�H ►• F 1�NHHH HM- H►� WW.W W W W fL to a W LI H V1 W U ¢ 2 W W W W W H Y .SiS S ? T H VI 0 r/1 N 1^ \ • O 0 0 o o o u U U u U u cnc�r, n oOnnon M 0] 00 ] acrcrlran. o Y ¢, z rrld Qa a x211. a_ CL d c n, JJ.J JJ JJ JJJJJJ .J Q 1' J J J J J J J J J J J J W W W W 1.. W G p f_1 S tnNV to to t.1W 1.11.1 L141 L, L.W L: 1.11. W UlJ If 11 Ulf J tr U \ s s m a n Cr m m m m m m m m m m m m H H H H H H Q p N & L;U)WWL' LLLLU LL LL LL n' r-. ♦ Y >- as 73 71 ni 3:5 3 -1 31 m O : i z r i z c c z z r z c z z z z u o 0 0 U. LL x a c a O 000000 or P a. ar(X P"J.-L,n a P O• OO b0000 VM VN oO P P d n t'.!7O C't7O P P r '1 P •O r-f\ O r .pP 1p C.. Mme .,rj N L�C) r. N d V` O J%0 C)cr tr 0•:; 0• �•.P p P rvj V, 0. D O P P P r O ^ P p C C' n n d s P ` N M r d Fn M J M, M N d O O r•� V1 O � S d d d J J d d d d d J V s J d d J .• V J d d d J d d s s v or 67 w or oc ac Or •rmxonx tr a ocaa fir or cr Or w or acr or m '. ^^r te ^ W \\\\ \ \\ \\\\\ \\ \'\\\ Z r Z M./,. M •r M.M N'.M N. M V YM M M' V, MMM M Y M nr. r•� N„, M' C •77r'.r -J OC77 J:7O:J J''f7.OUO OO.0 .7 OHO :7 [ 7 O : Y ♦ J J J d d • \\ \ ^N.. A \\ P \,\\ A • N M I1Jf N N ItN • P • 0C • O ♦ 00, L' • Na L'f V`r V� • 0C-w 0, _p DO tt' 70 In 00 00''00 w 00, ♦� r r;r� •-fir • N. • M �� ♦ 'd • Ji lJ • M Ml M W) N, • N1 M. M M 1p M M M N M M IM M:M1; ♦ d V IJ V J jJ • d • d • J • d� S t dJJ VJ .• -2 -2 -J .v J J .2 .2 V' •I VJ,JJJIV '.• J •' d ♦ !J i• '41 C` • /� f\A f\ \ • P P P P,'.P A A'P A \!ti P r,!\ • P • P • .P • r- 0 O C c,O 0 O O C OIC C P • n C'C C O O • C • O • C1 • Oi \ y y y U U VY Y y y c.Li 1 1 I ! U U Y Y le y lAJ 4 W • • • J O oD J O a Mi O 7t 2 N N V 10 N •w J '•' M y N N J N N N ' �.5�.,, • .p w ! / 1 " V V V.0 .p�O M�o p ly00 N ;/0 er •- 10 �O•�r N•- ./-N A 1 1 1 1 1 J •. M N N N J N N Mr V'O O.O I J V.0 .O.O ftj M4 MSO�O MM''M Q i Z M M 0 'O N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 ' O 6 _ O •IV N M •Nn 00000 000 000 1 1 N •- - C) U / 1 V V J V N N N N N f V N N N M WI Y 1 M O {� U r r 1 1 1 J J J V J J J J M�M O•,P O C' U U O O D U O t7 0 w,p M M to 00 ff • • e d • • . 1.1 W 4. d Q' W 1.t 1.1 • F 1� 2. O •D tN K w L1 uu W W •1 • tY 1,. • • b M •4 • • • J J . e 1-►- • • •" mmm ao uu IIty a< •�� z •• N n e a ¢ ¢ y SZ y Q `r Q z ad •d •! WLl W Ll = O = y y y y y y y qS S [] • • 1- • z WWWI.IM WL1 Z' OpoZ Z �- Q • • H N H H s♦LJ Z 00 C, C5 ft ILa a c� W W t=IJ 5 W ¢ O »m 7 »J •r w H =_ a W yyyyy yym d e d W l•l K fY tY L. H t/1 H IJ 7 7_ W I�►r LL cr Y 00 7 • ~ y uu U u ¢ m rr Z 41 n.n.. �. O L/ V1 a Cr tr H►..w 1� W LI Li u F` J X y F O 1.1 L1 L 11,1 W m m m y y y � \ = W C !2nr Z3 Z: 2- 733 G Q ¢ • • 7 0 0 0 0 I.1 1.1 W (// W >. Y L' TS S T JJJ 777 O [r C. R \ \ \ wI -a4 O r, a !~.+ L1 LIW LLi lLJIJ[a,.,L, UJJJ t \ \ LL Q. 1.1(.1 L1 L)WW W L1 ;2j a s z l r �, e Z G n (1 C v tl > >> C) V u' 1- �„ r n O n n > zhe Ic If KIX W •.. O C '¢ Qaioa a e UV 4 e ¢ Iru u = S S S S S S S S sp a s N rA y [�1 y N In 0 2 S 2 Q e Ntoy yy ♦ • • • O 6 v 0 0O O DD• • • O• • • • C) • CC nD NN K N ONNC) P- J OL 000 ^j ell MM 1010 O M NIn OIc .0 Z P, C3 •-•-N N^ ^ ti A N[•N O • v K a K V J v J V J \ \ of k. O 'r - tX d 0 d K0 V J d J �! \ \ O O o dtr da. Li \ \ •' ^ r ^ J J ^ •- ^ J J 1 J J ^ J V ri rn Y X o ♦ .- • .p • i. ♦ ( • ti V� J d • v • J • ? • P • n ,S MO M M M ♦ ,il+ r y • u r. K • ., S J J • • v ♦ v • v • y GOO ♦ O :J. ♦ G"I-I ♦ ^.� C. \ t` • • 'v • 1 • J ♦ v :J V J,6*1 th H'. • N 1� s u^.v1 tM • an stn C* r • fw ♦ \ • ti • f` .\ti :.r. ♦ J J �! i V v K :♦ .}:J oc lamcc:o • c n • c c a r. C. c • o;c, i V Li41 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 to • • • • • • • d (A CL a Z i d >Q K i 1 • t • .e i a a M 10 N J I I O at In .p J � • r i • r .O 7 ' ? i2 11000 CID N POI-- rN rr N N r N NN IM •+ r r.•�M J r r M J P N M J N J M r r i M • rN'd rr rrrrr�O Nr r 'D � 10•Ci,grN HA rNrN rr N N N r V• V•v ;M Z rr.t••Md rrMJO' J Md N J M r rr !M 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t 1 i 1 1 1 1 • 1 ►� 000.. O 2 MMMMM rrrrr'.M - 00 'O r M r M M r M(). � N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N M M N M M M ' J J d J J a d J J J d J J U rrrrr rrrrrr 1 1 ', 1 r r •.. a c000c oaoaoo 00 o a c c o cc,, o • . a a a W LI W W W It !Y ce • • ' 7 K e e: C Ir 1„ h H oe tl as 'N CA y ed ed •d•� •d V) ~ • • LL VIW N W tq W fl- • • • • • Z z •y U Q)p U 0 �N F N F F 2 M tti M L) H 0 X, 2zzz ., In Q Q Q Q d Ned CC W ,t = _ _ = NNytAyi: W W W 1.1 W IJ CA y W 0 N M • • J H • • • • JJ JJJfl J J S L^ C9 tS t, co a a a a a l'- ",w • al LI • J 1.1 U • LI nn AOP1a a a ti tL� 'O ~ tL CL M. C LL ►- J J JJ J O77 »O OO et O n' tX J re U m ►• 3lmmmgo tnyNyyW NW 'd W, H d y f• y a or Ll y ' C. o n a e o p O O p p I* U 2 Y •9OC9 C9O W W W W WLJ tr U W 2 U 272X, 7 d d F. J •..•ti•ti•rw yyy Nyy H • f = O n J 2 22222 yyy CA0y <d �. N w O d 7 2 4 U a d d d d I.1 W W W W 41 U U O n In > a a a O U U U U U In y w y CA N W 41 y a' • = t) h s J > O cr>> > >> I Z > F W > > V t.� v: u1 y y t^ (T a' m Tcr T. d d a Y Y Y Y Y L' T J • .v N n > rn crt- t^ toA KKQtY e' JJJJJJ W W 2 I,1 tr / �.—., a .1 -1 W L W W Li Li O- a W n 7» » :5n J 7 m 2 N 4J In! 7. y V1Nyy yCn VI CA tAy " tt: In 4 JJJJJO 00 ICM Ir I-"t- NN rr 00 NN OCC GO J • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a NJNC r rC Oa K C,'0 NrM JJ t? P t- � V` I a < a:In 00 M N r N r r M N N d 0 0 or cc Or ~ r' ek N M N N r r � r e- 7 1 4 rb' tr tra Or w ao b a ma a a tr a n ar tr 1 J V �1 V J J �T J J �? �• 1 J ' Y • uC•JC'0 ♦ O d O d O .O • C-1 • •O A • w i ♦ G 'J r CJ ♦ N N N N N a N'N fl, tV N tV N N • ,J • d; J • V+ ♦ IT ♦ 7 p lJ • V\V` V1 V\V' • V\V' V,V, V` V, V\V1 • V1 ♦ N {/�� • V1 ♦ N ♦ .e ,0 1 S • J J �t J J • J J V J J d J J • J I• J • J J J • C,C OCC ♦ 0 C C- C C.,0 C'C: • 'O • GC • C' • T • C, r O r O A ry s h=A 7r .� I ♦�' � p . �` '�'� - - —. _ -.. -.• _ �; Y � Y n fr ff O tl V O V iC �6 V^ D O O h t.7 . •, 1 I W 4 • • t I •. 'a to • I •, ago n a I ) cc do 00 N N tr r M. d ;r•-•.M�/'�f M N N _ MM r J rrre-MJJ M d.Nf r • r r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r Ir N d r r r 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 Or r r r r 1 1' 'E000mrNN I~ r r r r _ M'. d •.r 'M d J N aN1 N N 'M V1 Nr r N N N c N! r 1 1. 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 i r J r r MJJ M M I JJ' r Z NO. •-' •.•.rr r M •'- N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O I I QM M M N N N'r V N N h M M M r r r r r r r M M 0, U ; It J V d d d V V V V J J V d J V N d M M M M Mi U rr •., r-r, I rr� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 j d Jd dI a 00. O 000000 O r0 " r' .- ♦- rre- r. .- r ^r /I �' C C,000�O OC O C' 00 p a a L1 O • • f' V i- � • • •i ..� d tL � td y a a � N ►� r„i t- O O W ►+ ►a w y y • • y� a a O • y tY Q • •" •+ L, tJ_ D •1• •D j = O (0)Ix •2.. m m O C, t 1 Ix y m m N UU O N 00 w v)yy •Oba ba O C I z Z y W W W W W to 0 S y y i V) to N y y►rw J t!WMId W W W NN d' S z Z • (L o- (L W m • H �""-J j j J J J JI a J J J J J J J iJ W 0 0 W aaaaat- y y . aaaaaaa > > 00 ]•! el •rrr ^ 3D Meg _ > > w A an aad a ~ a rr °• ► �' a a tAyyyyW H p tr u tY' O W yy IA NNyy F fn u3 Y .I n J LI t ' H I 0 Co J F-t-►- F-�►�F � 2Z • J 4 2227 -" 7z i °) •"'•'� 7 `! • U W LI W L)W W W 2 L ZS i Z U w SS F_ tSZS 2 CA J tY C i WWWW WWW a • • n n- y 1.1 eft C, t^ J J 2 n rn 7 r •f a .r e. e a ?' 7 C' cc en O • • • • "'1 '� a L, T222 � 2 OO t'.'/ l9Ot,L t7 C7 W \ \ as aaaae ? 00 S U. Li II L. La U. ¢ LI 7 C k' Si Sii ui U 1.1 a n. C Z K \ T S t T T i H '� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2 • • W. ♦.� r- V)0 y a a a a a CL J 1r. a J n O O O O C O > W K Li 41LI I.IWW W WW •'1.. \ \ = v�V)N t',1/,vi vl ¢ •-. tl a• a s= = NNNNNN J c = N rn rn rn •� rnN r� v a a a a a a Qac Z ¢ m m a u • ono no ocMInMQ WN 6n a a� nn i N N f� 'tNNr z OOO • • • • • • • • • • NN NN N V't NN MM Pro 00 MNMV ^ - - .- V J f? MIn V V v`Np a0 a'. n A. In 0, T a V J tr0, d Ta OCOODR •1 J V J JsvJJ -S a a a OCxtx tra •- a a � or a tq r V ^ J d J ^ J J J V J V r ►- K v N M M N: M M M \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ r r � •" M M M M M r. M M M M M \ \\ \ n 7 C1 7 CJ''7 7 -1 , c_ ori n ICS • R R s C • M M M'.M M M •' f V d d V J'J V ,C \ 'U' • rr • n • v+,v,u�In .' O 4 O I O ! OO�c 7Cp0 c O I 00� c 41 • .0 d • ,C • ,p IG 10 1O.0 1D s S • J V . J • J V J J J J • m tD m OC :i fC?C OO 'rJ J_O 30 10 Op 'JD Op 1, `� � d d J d d'J ♦'. AN s A • NN N!C)NA • N c N C AAIn NN'NN ^ V dd d • O O • C • C�C- O IO C G: • C' C C7 C O C f- C,C�C) G N N N A G CD v! O t I Fl • 1, 0 P, 0 a ii n (i —i o ICL at CN A Go in tv LIN In M 00 Le% ry M r f"I On O fw wv I, M f%i f1i ry on In to) m PI) 0 In o 00, 1 1 1 1 N V% 0 1 wv m pn M.PO)PPI A M01 D on M1 fn on on ry 6.% 0 -*-P%V 4 .0 V i .0J Mpn u O Ab 0 0 0 0 • LI w zip 1- cr n 0 • dy —"——64 Ila G. 'EL- • -0 n. M 0 tel(n 0 tn(A (A CL — w of Ll, mmmmomm u Ar u M 6.4 n m== ==m C.) u m fr 00M 0000 w (A W W u ► 3 cc m m cr it 1w Q u Z) _j (A to fa -a %a woe sa V) to N W S CA 0 fin V) V) (A 40 16.1 Li IAJ CA ta w w Li W W W UJ W 6j u W -i j -j -i ba W > ! > > >> > 0, 0. 91 Z a I.- g w :2 0. IL (A CL CA: 0 :� Its 1.1 > > 7 > D 9L LI fr O K N N (A O N 0 Li ti cr 0 OC 0 b. wCA 0 w z j •- w )K cm 0 u z Li u 5e ri C! z 0 u fr. U 0O L'i u .7 T D X w 14 0 (A 60(0 0(A O 04LLJ j L" 1;7- L,L.1 L,LIJ W Li L1 0 ta Ir Z- L I M. VI:pp 7 ;p mp vp 70 L! CO Of C3 (f) 0. IL a IL a. CL a S 7 p 0! (A W. N U C J 11 1. ,rc Z g g. U u uUt� LL 4. f%j N WN cc INC 00 UO E 00 00 NN M m OC On �c 10 10 10 10 C, &M N ac ev "NJ OL C, C5 on 0 C, M o N. IVC,0 Z O 00 IM w X w Ov m cc ac & OC ti m at OC` or 0. CIC or w u W, 73 W"Ll C) Wi P) C3 0 7 0 C) Y OC Go OL'or ac 00 00 01 C ON. OD U D L)0 C�CJ0 o C:! N ry W 30 00 DO x zo 90 20 30 oo 1 1 ;� 1 N Ngo 00 30 *0 M 00 cc Do so r I -S -& J1 * 1 %IP" 00 00 0 C, n O 1 C3 I C, C, C. W • Z: WN M ,oton f-j fu IV fli :— pn C, C, 0% pn — r N — 1 1 W, N IV N W, M W) M M ev ry fln M N LA U ra 0 O 0 10 O O O p C O N O 0 0 or 0 0(A K A j 0.-1.- CL w z V1 fm • -"X W w (r W • L) L"= >G cl OL(L) U 0 0 ► iz $A m z Lj ND Zi. Q: z w m :3. j Cp 0 0 0 D .0 Ir M Ix -9 ce Li tj LL cc ix 0 Z Li Li 13C V) 61 0. 0. W z CA CA 0 Li cm Li LL J J m Z.=LL U) x -d I- C! — IL 0 0 LL (A (n ILL It. LL 0 W ,-1 Z 4 Tw tj a- 0 f, -P 0 1.1 W 0 A C3 CA I.- z Ir m 1 3 05 n 0 j u cr ::) 0 14% =3 cr L'i(r I C3 A^j W V) 6j 0 (L 0 CD X �C Co co CL CL V cr L N u Z u a lAJ L) I G Li -j -j -j-j-i-i j u L, 19 1.- (x 0 1.- -4 .2 -a -0 -a .2 -a W u ,, 7— to w W u W w 2' F I... •-I- I S 0 45 & W y W- 0 cn W fm w -M -j (rLd u f., id 9 OL 61 Y hr cr V) U n Z Z 2 3. VN •IC •-C,O� (A -a 75 w u C)•-N M N V, Ll Li I.; D j cr 1- cr -1 Ll z ta (A cr 2 2 m Ir fv Y () IA c 10 V- 22 TZZ ZZ • bl- cl) -9 2 W Ll -i -i m D M n D m 2K P.- z =3 LL LA. u LL U LL U. L) V) S cn V% C', C,0 0 CD 00 F, P, It It P,P.- N Ll, r.r C`C3 w cc P- F.- C, C, 'v C� C�C� Lol n . . .1O MM P.C., [7 C. C�C� Jv C C� C� C. 00 NN 01 0! NN Ol C, W OC V%ir, NN MM JJ 10 AA n A J v F1,4 10 00 co 0113. NN AA J F'- AA — An CO W LM N PA or or a w OL or OK 3c W or cl PI) it, C') C3 :C) C3 C! L). 51 ac r 0 IM on on m P, w 00 so 4 L" 30 IN 3D i X 4 00 u i K P, C C, C3 ic) C, Cl C, ic, 0 C, iC, iG - r • Y. O n• • _ r f• N�i N N N ` � f'� t p n f �__ r. r n n f ': C � G P G � n��O r C D? G •- h n p n P I I ----I ---I _ � - rG n n n n n n n _ Y •• � I I I I � I I ' I �I—__ I I — IO.- N � • /1 ' CID I r O C • � I I I I � 1 � i I � ; o v I I I � � I a Nen •:1 u ►-� II i W J 3-- 0 _j o z m.j ; w s« N W tr 1 Y J J V < 4 N O Go OD 2 U. 4 v H I ID J i ao n n n n O a I j I to, • i I i ' � I I � I G z M 7 N n 00 O� O N M 7 1n U 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 O% ON O\ 01 m N N N N N N N N N -+ N N N Lr) M u1 In Ln 1r) Lr) M Ln Ln Ln rn Ln 1-1 1-1 -4 --1 .-4 .4 .--r H N O O O O, 7 r, O n M O -4 O O --4 O •.4 O O O O --, U1 rn 0 Irl c� ll� 00 C� C\ t.r1 C; M .-+ rn o o M O Ln r� m M In 7 O n M --r Ln .o N rn 00 N O r` 00 N 0o M n N v1 a) U rd O A -14m ro i Pa 00 ; ) v z in r~ aJ 4-+ = v .n 14-4 w ro C!) H a W J 1 41 H r1 m r.4 a U H JJ W O 41 m 1 = m ro O H ro u G 3+ 4-1z u a z z U 0 3 x 4 Pa x z � � A Cc rn 4-j co to m w 34 aJ a) r1 a a`no m Q co bo u ro a a o O a) r~ 0) Uro w rn •r1 U U U H --i _ _ _ _ _ -C �+ � •rr W O) U 4-4 a) U to w 4. E-4 E-4 N 0 H a) G) H H W aJ H a) Q al ro rn W a En •rr + cC u) oa r•1 ♦.1 u it U ca 4.1 O 1J 41 4J JJ 11 • 1-r •rA a1 4 u Q ro (1) 0) a) al a) w 1 1J O (1) O (1) m P4 P4 P CYi tYr P: LY+ W .'4 U P4 P4 04 N O O O ON 7 r� 00 nN -,t -4MN ',0OMMtnr� .-+ O O --4 m O O O 1-1 O --i v1 Ln O 00 7 7 01 N ID Ln cn ON r- 01% O O1 O O 7 E.1 .--1 V1 Oti O V1 ( 7 M O� c rn 7 ul (3 n O� 00 700 g N M O 7 -,� M •+ (31� O O M O ON I'D r- M O m O, 00 N .-1 cn r- rl O cr) 00 Ln 7 O n M rt Ln %-0 N N N 00 -+ M u1 M -4 M --1 M r- 0 M Irl �o a0 � .o --1 M t` d N u1 7 H U U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1-4 ---1 -1 .-4 --/ -4 1.4 1-1 .-I •-i --1 --1 -4 .-4 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O •-4 -"1 1-1 --1 -4 -4 -a --1 --/ --1 --1 --1 --1 .--1 --1 -4 -4 -4 --1 1-4 --i -4 --A U -a --1 rl rl .-1 .•-1 rl --1 �p .-a .--1 --i ri .-1 .-1 rl .--1 --1 --� .-1 -� --1 r� r1 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 O O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r- r, --1 00 a) 00 P1 O O O O O O O NM O NNr+ NOON OOtnN C4 C4 r+ O •-' 0 O O O O O 00 U O O O O O 1� N N 00 cn r� --4 O ON O ON O O O O O O O N M O N M --1 N W N 00 Ln N N N N --1 O N O -4 O O O O O O O -4 -4 0 1�0 ',O M 7 •-1 M --+ M 1,0 \.O IO 7 r- 0 Irl 0 N -4 n 9 ►-1 O r`"1 00 O 000000000000 --1 •-+ O1 In N M N N N N N �+ •-+ 7 r� r\ r� n fl- r- r- r� n n n r- -4 --1 N H H mm M O\ a% ON m MM O MmcnMmMCl) mCl) Cl) mM Lr) z W 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 N 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 M 7 7 00 co 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 000000000000 r, r- -+ 00 z � Crn N H O O U M N N CJ} CL' O Q 2 N W � � ro a U -- - c •H G Wo = = U rMOMt- �t OOo� t- O U v C; O H Cn �O to M d r n C O% • 4 OM00 M � w w w w w w NM000� 00 N Ln N N N �t Vn 0000 � z o n :n o L b O r` O M O G h t N Cl) 44 N � N Lr) O u} 7 +� 'b d U1 4-1 44F' •a U 0000 >1CO V -4 4J ts7 N $4 ro OOOO to G C13 T� .-d (1) ro N ro 1 lC' U V) P4' ,ill. NU 0000 Or� -4 -4IO y HOr-i r, 0000 p0 ro .7 .i 1-4 00 to •-+ M M .-i M 'A M OO OO U Q� a% rn O� U M M M M CO O O O O W 921 LA A"141 LS Gene Brown Agency, Inc.g y� 119SOUi'H LEWIS STREET SIIAKOPFF,%I[NNFS01A «379 TE.L.EPHON[::445-5560 President Vice President F.IIGENE A.BROWN ROBERT J.BROWN December 13, 1983 City Administrator City of Shakopee 129 E . 1st Avenue Shakopee, Kinnesota 55379 RE: All that part of Blocks 13; 177; 136; 187; 1'3`x, except Lot 6 and the East 10 feet of Lot 5; 139; 190; 191;192; 193 ; 1`-)4; 195; 19n; 19'7; 193; in the City of Shakopee, Scott County, Nlinneso ta, lying north of the following described line: Starting at a point on tree west line of Shumway Street on the center line of Springy; Street and running westerly along the center line of said Spring Street 1140 feet to the west line of Cass ;street and thence southwesterly 684.7 feet to a point on the west line of Block 177, which is 50 feet south of the northwest corner thereof. Subject to an easement on all that part of the above described property taken by the State of P�.innesota under its action of condemnation on or about November, 1955, designated as Parcel 46. Dear Sir: I hereby request that all of the platted streets and alleys in the above descrived property be vacated and deeded to Eugene A. Brown and Esther W. Brown, the owners of the described property. Please advise procedure. Thank you. Siieerely, Eugene A. Brown LAB/kv r- t H � I d � i / Y.r fir' •, t 4 _ J M �D CL-- RESOLUTION NO. �Z3j A RESOLUTION DENYING APPLICATION TO VACATE CERTAIN STREETS AND ALLEYS AS HEREIN DESCRIBED ALL WITHIN t THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE WHEREAS, Eugene A. Brown and Esther W. Brown, his wife, are the fee owners of the following described property located in the City of Shakopee, County of Scott and State of Minne- sota, and described as follows : All that part of Blocks 13, 177, 186, 187, 188, except Lot 6 and the east 10 feet of Lot 5' 189, 190 , 191, 192, 193 , 194 , 195, 196, 197, 198 lying north of the following described line : Starting at a point on the west line of Shumway Street on the center line of Spring Street and running thence westerly along the center line of said Spring Street 1,140 ' feet to the west line of Cass Street and thence southwesterly 684. 7 feet to a point on the west line of Block 177 which is 50 feet south of the northwest corner thereof; all being subject to an easement on all that part of the above-described property taken by the State of Minnesota under its Act of Condemnation in November of 1955 designated as Parcel 46 ; and, WHEREAS, under date of December 13th, 1983 the said Eugene A. Brown and Esther W. Brown filed a request with the City of Shakopee asking that all of the platted streets and alleys in the above-described property be vacated and deeded to Eugene A. Brown and Esther W. Brown; and, WHEREAS, on the basis of investigations and actual know- ledge made and obtained by the Shakopee City Council as assisted by the City Attorney, the Council has determined that for a period in excess of 15 years prior to the adoption of the Laws of Minnesota for 1899 , Chapter 65, approved March 18th, 1899 , the ownership of all of the above-described property has been held by a succession of various owners and during all of said period the said owners have continuously occupied and used all of the above-described property and the streets and alleys therein for farming and similar use, and that their use and possession by others than the City during all of said period was open, actual, continuous , notorious and exclusive insofar as the City of Shakopee and the public in general is concerned; 77 and, 2 - WHEREAS, although platted by the plat of Shakopee City which was filed December 26th, 1855, none of the streets and the alleys have ever been laid out open, used or maintained by the City of Shakopee or any other public body as and for ; public ways, street, alleys or thoroughfares ; and, WHEREAS, by reason of such occupancy and use, and the fact that said streets and alleys were never actually laid out and maintained as such, the City of Shakopee does not now and for many years past have any right, title, interest or claim in and to any part of the above-described alleys and streets . The title thereto is in the owner of the above-described property by virtue of the foregoing. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL that the application of Eugene A. Brown and wife Esther W. Brown for the vacation of the alleys and streets as above- petitioned be and the same hereby is denied on the grounds that the alleys and streets were never laid out and never did in fact exist , and the City has no interest to vacate . Passed in Session of the Shakopee City Council held this day of , 1984. MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE ATTEST: CITY CLERK Prepared and approved as to form this day of 19 84. CITY ATTORNEY _ Iob MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Admin. FROM: Judith S . Cox , City Cl.erkl-j--" RE. : Vacation of Part of a Drainage & Utility Easement Within Scenic Heights lst Addition. DATE: March 12 , 1984 BACKGROUND: In 1981 , when the Planning Commission considered a request from Mr. Clete Link for a variance for Outlot 1 , Scenic Heights 1st Addition ( CR17 at 10th Avenue ) , it came up that the lot to the East had a 10 foot drainage and utility easement along the Westerly boundary and that the easement was encroached upon due to the construction of a garage . BACKGROUND: A condition of approval was that Mr . Link convey a five foot easement along the Easterly boundary of the Outlot . This easement has been conveyed which now provides , along with the original easement , a total easement of 15 feet . The property owner of Lot 3 , Block 1 Scenic Heights 1st addition, Mr. Vohnontka , is desirous of having the easement encroachment vacated in order to clean up his situation, should he desire to sell his property sometime in the future . ALTERNATIVES : a ) Set public hearing date to consider vacation. b) Retain the total drainage and utility easements . ACTION RECOMMENDED: Offer Resolution No . 2236 , A Resolution to Initiate Vacation of Part of a Drainage and Utility Easement Herein Described and Fixing a Time and Place for a Public Hearing on the Proposed Vacation, and move its adoption. JSC/bn e6 'Z�', RESOLUTION NO. 2236 A RESOLUTION TO INITIATE VACATION OF PART OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT HEREIN DESCRIBED AND FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED VACATION WHEREAS , there exists a 10 foot utility and drainage easement along the Westerly portion of Lot 3 , Block 1 , Scenic Heights First Addition; and WHEREAS, the property owner has unknowingly constructed a garage over the Easterly three feet of said easement ; and WHEREAS , it is desirable by all parties concerned that the Easterly three feet of the 10 foot easement be vacated; and WHEREAS , it has been made to appear to the Shakopee City Council that the Easterly three feet of the Westerly drainage and utility easement lying within Lot 3 , Block 1 Scenic Heights 1st Addition serves no public use or interest ; and WHEREAS , a public hearing must be had before such action can be taken and two weeks published and posted notice thereof must be given. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA that a hearing be held in the Council Chambers on the 17th day of April , 1984 at 7 : 30 p.m. , or thereafter, on the matter of vacating the Easterly three feet of the utility and drainage easement lying along the Westerly boundary of Lot 3 , Block 1 , Scenic Heights First Addition according to the plat thereof . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that two weeks published notice be given by publication in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and posted notice be given by two weeks posting a copy of such notice on the bulletin board in the main floor of the Scott County Courthouse , on the bulletin board in the Shakopee City Hall and on the bulletin board in the Shakopee Public Utilities Building. Adopted in ___session of the Shakopee City Council held this day of 1984. Mayor of the City—ofS aopk ee ATTEST: City Clerk 1 � �o t '- - - �.0 (- -, - 145.0- - - " i5 - �� 5 � �- �� 24 i r) f' d' ! g f aoan' LO 6 WD 9 VV I � X41 _. t, 6)10 �� � J o in - �V, - ` WEST � 1 1•• 1 n I 1 ,.+ , I I ^�I 1.11 �•,, � � w� ,.♦ b J� r TO: Judy Cox, City Clerk FROM: Lou Van Hout, Utilities Manager DATE: February 7, 1984 RE: Easement along East side of Lot 3, Block 1, Scenic Heights 1st Addition The easement described above has been involved in a controversy dating back to early 1982 when it was discovered that part of a garage had been built on the easement. The encroachment is approximately 3 feet, and the property owner, Mr. Fran Vohnoutka, asked that the City vacate the easement. At the time this was discovered we had some overhead electric lines crossing that part of the easement so it could not be vacated. Since then we have reconstructed to underground wiring in conjunction with the new buildings on the property to the West. At the January 9, 1984 meeting the Utilities Commission agreed to the vacation of 3 feet of the 10 foot easement, and asked that City Council be asked to proceed with the request by Mr. Vohnoutka. c.c. Fran Vohnoutka �©t'� MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S . Cox, City Clerk RE : Vacation of Alley Easement in Block 3 , Eagle Bluff 2nd Addition. DATE : March 19 , 1.984 INTRODUCTION : It has been brought to my attention that the alley easement for Block 3 , Eagle Bluff 2nd addition was incorrectly described and recorded in 1977 . BACKGROUND: As the result of a pending sale of a lot in Block 3 of Eagle Bluff 2nd addition , it has been discovered that the 16 foot all-ey easement was incorrectly described as the East 16 feet rather than the West 16 feet along the seven lots adjacent to Prairie Street . I have written the seven property owners asking if they wish an alley and if they would sign a new alley easement establishing the alley in its correct location. To date , I have heard from four of the seven and they are interested in keeping the alley. Meanwhile , I 'd like to recommend that Council set a date to consider vacating the 16 foot alley easement along the East 16 feet of the lots in Block 3 . Whether or not it is desirable to vacate , caii be determined al the public hearing. ALTERNATIVES : a ) Set public hearing for April 17 , 1984. b) Delay setting hearing for more information, to be determined by Council . c ) Delay setting hearing until an alley easement is signed by the seven property owners . RECOMMENDATION: Because a lot closing is being held up at this time , Staff recommends setting a hearing to consider the vacation and Staff will work simultaneously trying to secure an alley easement from the seven property owners . ACTION REQUESTED: Offer Resolution No . 2238 , A Resolution to Initiate Vacation of an Alley Easement Herein Described and Fixing a Time and Place for a Public Hearing on the Proposed Vacation, and move its adoption. JSC/bn RESOLUTION NO. 2238 A RESOLUTION TO INITIATE VACATION OF AN ALLEY EASEMENT HEREIN DESCRIBED AND FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED VACATION WHEREAS , there exists a 16 foot alley easement along the Easterly portion of Block 3, Eagle Bluff Second Addition; and WHEREAS , the said alley easement was erroneously described against the East 16 feet rather than the West 16 feet of Lots 1 - 7 , Block 3 , Eagle Bluff Second Addition; and WHEREAS , it has been made to appear to the Shakopee City Council that the Easterly 16 feet of Lots 1 - 7 Block 3 , Eagle Bluff Second Addition serves no public use or interest ; and WHEREAS , a public hearing must be had before such action can be taken and two weeks published and posted notice thereof must be given. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA that a hearing be held in the Council Chambers on the 17th day of April , 1984 at 7 : 35 p.m. , or there- after, on the matter of vacating the Easterly 16 feet of Lots 1 - 7 , Block 3 , Eagle Bluff Second Addition according to the plat thereof . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that two weeks published notice be given by publication in the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and posted notice be given by two weeks posting a copy of such notice on the bulletin board in the Shakopee City Hall and on the bulletin board in the Shakopee Public Utilities Building and one on the bulletin board in the main floor of the Scott County Courthouse . Adopted in _ _session of the Shakopee City Council held thisday o 1984. Mayor of the City-of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk i L_'( L F F4-L,)F F F1 -7 A[ E-- 14 171 P� 11Z57E I 0 j I Vol A 00 tp 00 1 7C) Ve S< f N S9 77), 7-I C-- '-?f)E. ro WN to --n E ®RO %I D co 7 ll�D N Fn 2"-,:3n EZ AAV E ALL .Q0 10 DDC .