Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/15/1982 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROi,:: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items DATE: June 10 , 1982 1 . June 22nd is Council ' s first Budget Session on Goals & Objectives . Please review your 1982 Goals & Objectives (call me if you can' t find your list ) and plan to come prepared with a list of ideas for 1983 . 2 . Eugene Pearson has filed a tax appeal petition with the County Court . It is the same issue we are dealing with at the Board of Equalization and the County will handle it . 3 . Susan G. Fredeen has filed a damage claim against Roland Rueger and the City complaining about construction defects not caught by the City Inspector. Rod ' s motion, attached, is to dismiss it because we are not liable under current Supreme Court rulings . 4. Attached is an informational item about COACT' s plans to solicit door to door in Shakopee . 5 . Attached are the minutes from May 12 , 1981 with Council ' s action on the platted vacant lots . The action was not in resolution form. 6 . Attached is a letter from Dave Durenberger regarding the Boulder Case . 7 . Attached is a notice and a copy of the minutes of the last SRA meeting regarding the SRA' s plans to focus on the MWCC. 8 . Attached is a notice and the table of contents of the 1981 Annual Report of the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District . Anyone interested in the full report can get it at City Hall . 9 . Attached are the new administrative procedures we will use when seeking proposals for equipment , etc . that don' t require formal sealed bids . Call if you have any questions . 10 . Attached is a letter from St . Francis Hospital regarding free 40 hour first aid courses for our police and fire department personnel . 11 . Attached is the Building Activity Report for the period ending May 31 , 1982 12 . Attached are the minutes of the May 3 , 1982 SPUC meeting. 13 . Attached is the Revenue Report as of May 31 , 1982 . /3504,1 STATE OF MINNESOTA JUN 8 1982 DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF SCOTTCITY OF SAKOPsEE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT Susan G. Fredeen, Plaintiff, -vs- NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION Roland Rueger and the City of Shakopee, Defendants. TO: MICHAEL V. SOVIS, 7574 West 147th Street, Apple Valley, Minnesota, 55124, ATTORNEY FOR SUSAN G. FREDEEN PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on the 16th day of July, 1982, at 9:00 a.m. , or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard in the District Courtroom in the District Courthouse in and for Scott County, City of Shakopee, before one of the Judges of the above-named Court, the undersigned will bring the following motion. MOTION Based upon all of the files, records, and complaints and other materials and pursuant to the Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant, City of Shakopee, moves this Court for its Order as follows: 1 . For its Order dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint against the Defendant for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 2. For its Order for Judgment in favor of the above-named Defendant on the pleadings. 3. For its Order granting the moving Defendant reasonable attorney's fees as against Plaintiff, Susan G. Fredeen, for the necessity of defending this action, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 549.21 . 4. For such further relief as the Court may deem just and proper under the circumstances of this case. Dated: KRASS, ME R, KANNING WALSTEN C E. s I:Aw OFFICES /✓ :R ASS and NIANAHAN CH‘RTEREU 1221 4TH E. E. I . 'r.ss ti11"°PEE, 1I.. 55379 Attorney for Defendant, City PRIOR LAKE OFFICE of Shakopee 305 CENTRAL. AVE. N. 1221 Fourth Avenue East P.O. BOX 253 Shakopee, MN 55379 'RIOR LAKE, MIN. 55372 p (612- 445-5080) tt 0-' tLce RECEIVED Q COACT JUN 41982 1216 South Sixth Street y Telephone 218-828-1805 8ro,nerd Minnesotc, 56401 CITY O1= SHAKOPEE Local Headquarters - - - MN 55418 - ( 612) 781 -05--39 Officers : Polly Veeser fete Ranum ('resident Vice-President 301 N .W. 2nd St . Rt. 4 Little Falls , MN 56345 Crosslake, MN 56442 Dear c Minneso a COACT (Citizens Organizations Acting Together) , is a statewide non-profit political organization. We are working on such issues as the decontrol of natural gas, a state oil tax , and controlling toxic wastes . As part of our efforts to involve citizens in these vital issues , Minnesota COACT is conducting a door to door canvassing drive through- out the Minneapolis-St.Paul metropolitan area. We will answer questions , disseminate information, and gain support hrough petition- ing and fundraising. We plan to begin our drive in :moi: 1 -eQ.--) within a couple of weeks . As a non-profit political organization Minnesota COACT is registered with the state of Minnesota and exempt from standard soliciting ordinances. However, in recognition of the needs of your community , we adhere to the following procedures as a matter of course. We conduct our canvass Monday through Friday from 4-9 P.M. , as that is when most people are home. We will notify the police department on the first day of our drive, and leave the names and addresses of our staff with them. Our canvassers carry picture ID cards and are courteous at all times . • I may be reached at the above address , or at -7-84-0-534). Thank you for your time and consider.Won in this matter. We are eager to work with the people oft Sincerely , 02L401 '44-f-eXcct-C— Canvass Director II 5 la, / / , ,,.•:-„•,,,. . „: v i inn * , . ,,, .„. , tltit.tua Link marled about his g..ld.nt' ial proPr.r•tp v1•.•r.• tnrrsw wrnt f r..m 52f10 to •S The City Assessor explained that this i:; b:cau::e of the policy which applies to new developments in which if one lot is sold, all adjacent lots fronting on the same street can have their assessments raised to a comparable .Level. Scott County is in the process of changing their procedure for these assessments, and the Assessor recommended that Shakopee do the same to be in conformance. This is a problem in new development areas where a 3 year gear l e t i od is allowed for reduced tares. Harbeck/Reinke moved to direct the City Assessor to correct any lot valuations on those plats that are eligible for the 3 yeAr ,grace period on new developments as needed to concur with the County. Cncl . Leroux stated he will abstain from the vote her:iva' of a financial interest on a lot with the three year grace period. Motion carried with Leroux abstaining. Cletus Link also stated that he didn' t think it was fair that those businesses in the downtown area are paying $2.50 per square feet for taxes and in the Minnesota Valley Mall the businesses are only paying $1.00 per square feet. The Assessor explained that as something gets bigger, the price g oe:. down. Cncl. Hullander also said that the City does not have to provide as many services to the mall as to the downtown area, such as parking. Leroy Menke appeared and said he was concerned because he recently sold a lot to someone and represented the taxes as they were, and then the taxes went up so much that he felt it wasn't fair to the buyer, as he wasn't expecting that much of an increase. He asked for clarification of the motion that was just passed as far as when it would take place and if it would be retroactive. He was answered by the Assessor that it would affect only properties this year, for taxes payable next year. The City Assessor asked the Board of Review to take a look at occupancy levels as a measure of taxes and valuation within the industrial park, a study which is being done now for the ICC. Cncl. Leroux stated that this was a tax philosophy question ` that would have to be addressed by the City as far as taxing on the basis of use or occupancy or square foot, etc. Chuck Yessian, representative of Kmart, said it is his belief that the problem•.is with appraising real estate at its market value, and he doesn't believe the market value put on the Kmart warehouse is proper. He believes it should be $15-16 million instead of the $22 million the Assessor indicated. He feels it is impossible to get that much in the marketplace, they just overbuilt the building. He stated Kmart will be taking it to court. The Assessor stated that Kmart wants the building compared as a spec market warehouse, but it is really a very special use warehouse. More discussion followed. Harbeck/Leroux moved to continue the Board of Review to May 26, 1981. Leroux/Colligan moved to amend the motion to May 19, 1981 at 7:30 p.m. Motion on amendment carried unanimously. ' ROBERT J.DOLE.KANS..CHAIRMAN BOB PACKWOOD.OREG. RUSSELL B.LONG.LA. WILLIAM V.ROTH,JR.,DEL. HARRY F.BYRD,JR..VA. JOHN C.DANFORTH,MO. LLOYD BENTSEN,TEX. JOHN H.CHAFES, R.I. SPARKM.MACOYNI HAWAII. �C rf eb �f of e� .$e'r�af e JOHN HEINZ,PA. DANIEL PATRICKK MOYNIHAN,N.Y. MALCOLM WALLOP,WYO. MAX BAUCUS, MOAT. LL.ARMSTRO . CO DAVIDILLL. ,N.J.OCOMMITTEE ON FINANCE p N " WILLIAM L.ARMSTRONG. COLO. BILL BRADLEY. J. IBP!—, STEVEN D.SYMMS,IDAHO GEORGE J.MITCHELL,MAINE WASHINGTON,D.C. 20510 CHARLES E.GRASSLEY,IOWA , ,'.�..0 't%J .1Iisv . HTHIZER.CHIEF COUNSEL of MICROBERT HAEL SETERLIGN.MINORITY STAFF DIRECTOR May 28 , 1982 j N 3 1982 CITY OF 5HAKOP E John K. Anderson City Administrator City of Shakopee 129 E. First Avenue Shakopee , Minnesota 55379 Dear John : Just a brief note to emphasize how concerned we all are with the possible implications of the Boulder case , The Judiciary Committee has primary jurisdiction over this , and although I am not a member of that committee , I know how much of a topic of concern this has become with my colleagues who are . Its impact on local regulatory powers also has obvious bearing on my own activities in Intergovernmental Relations . I just want you to know that we are aware of it , and I ' ll be glad to keep you apprised of any Congressional action, In the meantime , I hope you' ll kee , me and others in Washington apprised of any impact it has in you ju ' sdiction. interel Y - Da, Iurenb:I• - Uni DD:jrp LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE. LEFLER, KENNEDY, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION CLAYTON L.LEFEVERE BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE HERBERT P. LEFLER 2000 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST J. DENNIS O'BRIEN 103 BROOKLYN LAW CENTER JOHN E.DRAWZ MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 5637 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD DAVID J. KENNEDY BROOKLYN CENTER,MINNESOTA 55429 JOHN B.DEAN TELEPHONE (612) 333-0543 (612)536-8037 GLENN E.PURDUE CHARLES L.LEFEVERE HERBERT P LEFLER.EI RICHARD J.SCHIE[ JEFFREY J. STRAND li }1177 !! ti� i 1 JAMES P. O'MEARA ti SO MARY J. BJORKLUND IR AaI JOHN G. KRESSEL DAYLE NOLAN April 28 , 19823 19.62 CINDY L.LAVORATO MICHAEL A.NASH LUKE R.KOMAREK JOAN N.ERICKSEN ELIZABETH D.MORAN CITY OF SHAIKOPEg IMPORTANT NOTICE TO SRA MEMBERS Enclosed is a copy of the Minutes of the last quarterly meeting of the Suburban Rate Authority. Section 6 of the Minutes deserves your early attention. The SRA Board of Directors has resolved to attempt to organize a conference on the MWCC. Each member is requested to state its concerns regarding the adminis- tration of the MWCC by letter to Mr. LeFevere not later than May 10. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call him, or if he is not available, I will be pleased to respond. Very truly:ours, Glenn E. Purdue GEP:jdn Enclosure -- 4 . 4 . Treasurer' s Report: Mr. Dalen was unable to attend the meeting. He provided a report indicating that for the period ending March 31, 1982 , SRA had a cash balance of $23, 631. 13 and investments costing $73 , 359. 56 and having a face value of $75, 000. 00. It was moved by Mr. Frane, seconded by Mr. Hamernik and carried that the treasurer' s report be received. 5. Claims: The following claims were presented: City of Edina, which paid the last quarterly statement of LeFevere, Lefler, Kennedy, O'Brien & Drawz, ending 1/28/82 (authorized at the previous meeting of the Board) $3 , 247 . 45 LeFevere, Lefler, Kennedy, O'Brien & Drawz, legal services for the period commencing 2/4/82 and ending 4/6/82 $3 , 514 . 47 It was moved by Mr. Greavu, seconded by Mr. Shogren that these icl ims be approved and paid. Carried unanimously. 6. Report of Chairman Johnson: Chairman Johnson reported for the MWCC Study Committee. He referred to the Minutes of the Executive Committee dated March 31, 1982 , a letter from Clayton LeFevere, and Comparative Costs Committee Report, copies of which are attached hereto. Following general discussion of the matter, Mr. Boeck moved, with second by Mr. Hamernik, that Mr. LeFevere be directed to proceed with an attempt to organize a conference as described in Mr. LeFevere' s letter. Mr. Boeck stated that the conference would be for the purpose of presenting the issues apparent to municipalities and seeking meaningful responses from agency participants. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Greavu moved, and Mr. Anderson seconded, that members submit the concerns regarding the MWCC to Mr. LeFevere by May 10. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Reinke advised the Board of a meeting of the Joint Legislative Commission on Metropolitan Governance to be held at the Shakopee Junior High School cafeteria on May 7 at 7 : 00 p.m. The Commission is chaired by Senator Bob Schmidt and is charged with determining local government perceptions of the Metropolitan Council. Mr. Reinke urged all members to submit position papers. It was moved and seconded that the Chairman be directed to appoint someone to appear at the meeting and provide the Committee with the information gathered by the SRA. Motion carried unanimously. 2 8 Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Y-rL. gay 'tPA&AWt +.'' WARRIOR OFFICE BUILDING .40# BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55378 `•-':/167 . PLEASE REPLY TO: " 4344 IDS Center Russell A.Sorenson President PR 1982 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Jens Caspersen Vice President Russell Heltne Treasurer April 26, 1982 Caul S. Ess Secretary CITY OF SHAKOPEE Paul G. Fallquist CITY� SHAKO PEE E.Samstad Engineer Raymond A. Haik Attorney TO: Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Advisory Board, Local Municipal Officials, Area Legislators and Interested Citizens Within the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Re : 1981 Annual Report of the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Enclosed for each of you is a copy of the Annual Report of the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District for the year 1981 . The Report provides general background information regarding the Watershed District and illustrates many of the programs and activities which were carried out in 1981 by the District. The Report additionally highlights several of the cooperative project endeavors undertaken by the Dis- trict. If you have any questions or comments concerning this year' s Annual Report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Russell A. Sorenson, President Lower Minnesota River Watershed District RAS:kar Enclosure LOWER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1981 APRIL, 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 General Activities 2 River Navigation 2 Alternate Disposal Sites Basic Water Management Project 4 Cooperative Projects 4 Murphy' s Landing Project - Scott County 4 Dean' s Lake 4 Cedar Avenue River Access 5 Permit Review 5 Miscellaneous Activities 8 Inspection Tours and Reports 9 Inter-Governmental Cooperation 10 District Administration 10 Goals and Objectives - 1982 11 Introduction The names, addresses and terms of office of the present Board of Managers are: Name Address Term Expires Cyril S. Ess 115 South Elm Street March 23, 1984 Chaska, Minnesota 55318 2208 CountyRoad 34 March 23, 1985 Jens Caspersen BurnsvilleMinnesota 55337 Russell A. Sorenson 5000 West 112th Street March 23 , 1983 Bloomington, Minnesota 55437 Paul G. Fallquist 8828 River Ridge Road March 23, 1982 Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 Russell Heltne 961 South Shumway March 23 , 1984 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 The officers of the District are: Russell A. Sorenson President Jens Caspersen Vice President Cyril S. Ess Secretary Russell Heltne Treasurer The names and addresses of the advisors are : Mr. Kenneth Eidsvold Mr. John J. Klein 435 West Sixth Avenue John J. Klein Associates Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 1495 Lone Oak RoadEagan, Minnesota 55121 Mr. Merrill M. Madsen, Jr. 15008 Eileen Circle Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 Mr. William J . Jaeger, Jr . Mr. J. William Kennedy 10241 Tenth Avenue Circle Rural Route #1 , Box 177-A Minneapolis, Minnesota 55420 Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 General Activities In 1981 , the managers attended 15 regular and special meet- ings of the District. In addition, the managers also attended public meetings of local, regional , state and federal agencies . Through mailings of the District' s minutes, agendas and annual and general reports, the managers kept others informed of the District' s activities . In 1981 , a major concern involved the nine-foot channel maintenance requirements and negotiations with property owners regarding alternate sites for spoil disposal re- sulting from channel dredging. The managers are seeking to com- plete acquisition of dredged material disposal sites on the south side of the river. The administration of the District' s floodplain regulation program is a continuing program. River Navigation Because of the delay in funding for the U .S . Fish and Wildlife Service refuge land acquisitions , the District' s purchase of alternate dredged material disposal sites has been delayed . The managers have been in negotiation with landowners concerning acqui- sition of alternate sites and at year-end were nearing agreement with the Continental Grain Company on a 15-year lease of land . In addition, completion of off-channel barge fleeting sites has also been delayed. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service has in- formed the managers that its acquisition of District lands on the - 2 - north side of the river would again be delayed for a period of years . Such delay will require that the District, in the event maintenance dredging is required in 1982, use existing sites owned by the District within the City of Bloomington. Although objec- tions to such use have been received in the past, the Bloomington City Council has issued permits needed for channel maintenance dredging. The managers actively support barge fleeting areas and dredged material disposal on lands south of the river. Presently, there are no reasonable alternatives to the continuation of exist- ing barge fleeting permits along the main river channel and to the use of previously acquired dredged material disposal sites . The District continues to work with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and industry interests to find the best areas for barge fleeting. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service have briefed the managers on the proposed plans for the Minnesota Valley State Park and the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge and Recreation Area. The park and refuge are located along the Minnesota River from Fort Snelling to Jordan. The federal project consists of 18, 000 acres, 9, 500 of which will be part of the refuge under the jurisdiction of the U .S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The State Park is a trail system connected with wildlife and recreation areas under the jurisdiction of state and local governments . The managers work to ensure that river naviga- tion and related interests are taken into account during the over- all planning and that proposed plans and programs are coordinated - 3 - with federal responsibilities to designate and acquire alternate disposal areas. Alternate Disposal Sites Basic Water Management Project The proposal for the basic water manayement project initi- ated by the City of Savage for acquisition and development of per- manent dredged material disposal sites for nine-foot channel main- tenance was completed in 1981 . A basic water management project levy was authorized in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 112 .61 , Subd. 3 . The project was supported by private and public groups at the public hearings and meetings . Depending upon the funds received from the special levy and the Federal Government when acquisition occurs , the managers will consider their options as to future alternate site acquisitions . Cooperative Projects Murphy' s Landing Project - Scott County. The managers did not carry out any new projects at Murphy' s Landing in the County of Scott . They continue, however, to monitor project needs and to follow efforts by Scott County to expand project support. The mana- gers have a continuing interest in supporting this County project. Dean' s Lake. The Prior Lake/Spring Lake Watershed District project calls for an outlet control structure on Prior Lake and a water drainage system from Prior Lake through Dean' s Lake and on into the Minnesota River . Hearings by the adjoining District were held and the project is proceeding. Hopefully, the project will enable the District and the City of Shakopee to stabilize Dean' s - 4 - Lake water levels . The District will review the permits needed for the Prior Lake/Spring Lake Watershed District' s outlet project from the viewpoint of its support in establishing uniform lake levels for Dean' s Lake. Cedar Avenue River Access. In 1981 , the managers opened preliminary negotiations with the Cities of Bloomington, Eagan and Burnsville on development of a public boat landing at the Cedar Avenue Bridge crossing. Permit Review The District regularly reviews land development proposals for the upland river bluff areas . Such development continues at a steady rate. The District engineer reviews land grading plans to ensure that erosion control, surface water management and vege- tative restoration measures are followed. The overall development is reviewed in relation to permanent and temporary surface water, ponding sites , municipal storm sewer plans, sanitary sewer and other utilities necessary to service the site. The objective is to arrive at a proposal which would mini- mize the physical impacts and reduce the possibility of erosion or other types of problems being created by the proposed develop- ment. Although no formal permit applications for a project devel- opment have been received, the managers have followed the devel- opments in the City of Bloomington with regard to proposals by the Control Data Corporation and Northwest Airlines for the construction of buildings on property located in the East Side of the City of - 5 - Bloomington. The project proposals entail development of Minnesota River bluff lands. These projects have met resistance from inter- est groups concerned about the impact of the developments on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service refuge . Since funds are not avail- able to that federal agency for land acquisition, project develop- ment in Bloomington has continued following State agency hearings on the objections of the opposition groups . The managers submit- ted their comments and suggestions concerning the control of the developments directly to the officials of the City of Bloomington, the Metropolitan Council , the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources . As of year-end, the Council of the City of Bloomington has undertaken to review and re- vise its Zoning Ordinance with respect to bluff land developments . The managers will be evaluating the proposals by the City for con- trol of development in the bluff land in the forthcoming year. The managers will continue to monitor the status of litiga- tion commenced by a group of homeowners in East Bloomington who are challenging the authority of the City of Bloomington to authorize the construction of large office, residential and retail complexes on the Minnesota River bluffs . Illustrations of the types of permits evaluated during the year 1981 include proposals for industrial, office building and residential construction. These developments are occurring pri- marily in the Cities of Bloomington, Burnsville, Shakopee and Eden Prairie. The permits are reviewed by the engineer for the District - 6 - and his report is submitted to the managers at their regular meet- ings . Examples of these project proposals include: Doral Third Addition, residential development, West of Cedar Avenue and South of Old Shakopee Road, City of Bloomington; Sunset Lake project development, City of Burnsville; Minnesota Department of Transportation, Interstate Highway 494 approach span super struc- ture and main span deck, grading and land alteration; a request by Calvin Chadwick to appropriate water from Eagle Creek, City of Savage; a grading permit for Valley Commercial Park, 106th Street and Lyndale Avenue, City of Bloomington; a new water supply well for the City of Shakopee; a review of the City of Burnsville Com- prehensive Plan; a review of the Richard B. McGowan barge fleeting permit application renewal; a review of the permits required for the Grain Terminal Association barge fleeting and terminal harbor facility modification, City of Savage; a review of the NPDES per- mit application for the M. A. Gedney Company, City of Chaska; a review of the plans of the Prior Lake/Spring Lake Watershed Dis- trict for the Prior Lake outlet project; a review of preliminary project plans submitted by Control Data Corporation and Northwest Airlines for Minnesota River bluffs development projects; a Chapter 105 bank stabilization permit, Richard Johnson, U.S. Salt Company, City of Burnsville; Metropolitan Airports Commission, grading and land alteration permit for outfall channel revetment; Condominium development proposals, Minnesota Valley Country Club, City of Bloomington; Hampshire Pond Storm Water Outfall to the Minnesota - 7 - River, City of Bloomington; and, several miscellaneous preliminary project development proposals . As development in the bluff land areas adjacent to the Minnesota River increases, concern is given to proposed street locations, utility placement and surface water management so as to minimize the potential for erosion and other impacts in the river valley. Individual proposals for continued use of the navigation channel involved permits for maintenance dredging of barge slip sites by the industries within the river valley. An illustration of this type of permit evaluation and construction activity was the proposal by the Grain Terminal Association in Savage, Minnesota for upgrading of its terminal and barge slip. The District engineer ' s analysis includes an evaluation of the proposed construction and placement of fill material on the floodway and the impact on the passage of floodwaters through the site. Recommendations with respect to the proposed dredging activity are forwarded to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Miscellaneous Activities Since the formation of the Watershed District over twenty years ago, there has been a consistent effort made to maintain the records of the District. Because of space limitations and a review of the District' s needs, there was a concerted effort made by the managers to identify all the outstanding records of the District and to undertake a project of either destruction or placement of - 8 - such records in the appropriate State Archives . Notice to the State Auditor and the State Historical Society and others is re- quired as a condition of destroying public records . The District' s records were inventoried and the Minnesota State Historical Society obtained many of the early records of the District regarding its establishment and the construction and maintenance of the nine-foot navigation channel on the Minnesota River. Other District records of concern to the State Historical Society included the involvement of the managers in the development of the Fort Snelling State Park, the Minnesota River Valley State Park and their involvement in the efforts and activities leading to the creation of the Wildlife and Recreation Refuge of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The Society was also directly interested in the various cooperative project en- deavors of the Watershed District. In addition to their regular duties , the managers attended seminars and meetings of the State Association of Watershed Dis- tricts and wetland conferences sponsored by the University of Minnesota and several state agencies . The reports received from the wetlands and surface water management conferences were circu- lated to the managers for their review and background information. Inspection Tours and Reports In 1981 , the managers participated in regular and special inspections of areas within the District. The managers also re- ceived and reviewed a doctoral thesis prepared by Wayne Sames out- lining the history and background leading to the establishment of the Minnesota River Valley Recreation and Wildlife Refuge Area. - 9 - Inter-Governmental Cooperation As in prior years, the managers continue to attend meetings of local governmental units and commissions to discuss ongoing ac- tivities . The managers reviewed reports from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Cities of Bloomington and Burnsville and other municipalities of the District, the Upper Mississippi River Basin Commission and the Metropolitan Council . The managers also attended meetings of the Minnesota Association of Watershed Dis- tricts, the Upper Mississippi River Basin Commission Dredging Con- ference and meetings of local governmental units . The managers believe their involvement with these organizations promotes a better understanding of programs by officials involved in water resource management. The District also undertakes studies in the course of eval- uating specific permit applications . The District' s records, stu- dies and data are made available to interested citizens and other governmental units . District Administration In 1981 , the managers continued to distribute copies of the District' s Overall Plan and special reports to interested persons and governmental units . Copies of the District' s minutes, reports and special studies are made available to the general public and municipal officials . The District maintains its administrative offices in the Warrior Office Building in Burnsville, Minnesota. - 10 - Financial records are provided on a monthly basis to the managers . Each year, the managers authorize and obtain a financial audit of the District' s books and records . The official depository of the District' s funds is in the MidAmerica National Bank of Eagan. A copy of the annual and financial audit will be filed with the State Auditor. The managers retain the professional services of independent consultants to aid the District in its activities. Accounting ser- vices are supplied by Mr . Rudolph T. Borowicz of Borowicz, Holmgren, Loberg & Co . , Burnsville, Minnesota; engineering services are ren- dered by Mr . Lawrence E. Samstad of Itasca Engineering, Inc. , Cokato, Minnesota; and legal services are rendered by Messrs . Raymond A. Haik and Frederick S. Richards of Popham, Haik, Schnobrich, Kaufman & Doty, Ltd. , Minneapolis, Minnesota. Goals and Objectives - 1982 A major objective of the managers during the year 1982 will include the development of river-oriented recreational facilities on the substantial land area adjacent to and beneath the new Cedar Avenue Bridge crossing over the Minnesota River. For several years, the managers have worked with the adjacent municipalities in an at- tempt to encourage a cooperative project which would provide recrea- tional facilities and public access to the Minnesota River. Prior efforts with the City of Burnsville to develop an access site under- neath the 35W Bridge were not successful . However, during the year 1981 , and continuing on into 1982, the managers worked with offi- cials from the Cities of Burnsville, Bloomington and Eagan, the U.S . - 11 - Fish and Wildlife Service and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources in an effort to develop a cooperative project that would provide for a more public utilization of the excess lands available at the Cedar Avenue site. Manager Jens Caspersen, representing the County of Dakota, has had a long interest in this project . The ob- jective in 1982 will be to complete a Joint Powers Agreement which would provide for the development of this facility. In 1982, cooperative endeavors with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the U .S . Fish and Wildlife Service, the United States Army Corps of Engineers, and local municipalities and counties will continue. The completion of the acquisition and installation of improvements to utilize dredged disposal sites on the south bank of the river is a priority objective. The managers also hope to work on the river valley plan with the federal agencies involved in the refuge planning and development. Maintenance responsibi- lities, development of barge fleeting areas and decisions on land use of the river valley must be provided for and included in the plan. The basic water management project for permanent dredged disposal sites will continue and the managers will work with state and federal officials to ensure that sites are identified and ac- quired for long-term use for channel maintenance. Meetings will continue with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on the wildlife refuge development. As in past years, the managers will continue to encourage cooperative - 12 - endeavors with local municipalities and counties within the Dis- trict for public use land acquisition and development. In order to preserve a significant portion of the open space areas of the valley, the District continues to have a special concern for the acquisition of remaining lands . Dated April o71-174 , 1982 . Respectfully submitted, 7 WS;4-1- 2ey---\ Russell A. Sorenson, President - 13 - 9 MEMO TO: All Department Heads FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Procedures for Seeking Quotes or Proposals for items costing from $1 ,000 to $10,000 DATE: June 10, 1982 S.O.P. for purchase of miscellaneous equipment , maintenance work, purchase of government building equipment and equipment parts . 1 . The City shall publish a notice (regular notice or legal notice ) in the local newspaper requesting all interested parties to provide quotes on any part of, or all work required by the City or piece of equipment . The notice can be supplemented by a mailing to all local suppliers . 2 . Information regarding work to be completed or equipment to be purchased will be available at City Hall , 129 East 1st Avenue , Shakopee , MN. (Contact appropriate department head. ) Proposal or quote information will be written down and be the same for all potential suppliers . It will briefly identify the needed equipment or work, any special conditions , and the date, time and place of opening of the proposals and anyone can attend. 4. In the event that two or fewer suppliers or contractors have responded within five days of the date for opening, all known local contractors or suppliers in the effected trade will be recontacted by phone. 5 . After the opening of quotes or proposals for items under $2000 a purchase order or contract will be executed. Quotes and pro- posals over $2000 require Council approval . Two persons shall be present at the opening. 6 . The above procedure may be waived for emergency building or equipment repair or replacement . JKA: jms /D JUN 3_ 3 1932 CETT OF SHAKOPE!St. Francis Hospitalk.11111r4- 325 WEST FIFTH AVENUE•SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA 55379•(612)445-2322 dune 7, 1982 Mr. John Anderson City Administrator 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mr. Anderson, As I indicated to you on the phone previously, at their April meeting the Savage City Council voted unanimously to renew the contractual agreement with St. Francis Hospital for ambulance service. Prior to the Council decision, many issues were debated such as response time, patient destination etc. but the majority of the discussion involved the provision of education for first responders. Divine Redeemer had proposed that education in CPR and Advanced First Aid would be provided at no charge. I had stated that CPR would be continued for police and firemen free of charge as has been our practice previously. I further indicated that rather than First Aid we would prefer to teach the forty (40) hours D.O.T. First Responder course which is approved by the Department of Health and P.O.S.T. This is a new program from St. Francis Hospital and we were in the middle of teaching the first series at the time I prepared the proposal that Mr. Sinda had requested. I indicated in the proposal that although the $80.00 fee for this course only covered our costs, I realized the amount was significant if the city was to send several employees through the program and we were willing to negotiate those fees. Although the contract was not awarded on the basis of St. Francis paying all First Responder education costs. a.n Administrative decision was made following the Savage Council meeting that we would provide, at no cost, the 40 hour First Responder course to all police and firemen in Savage and Shakopee who are designated by their departments as First Responders to accidents, medical emergencies, etc. We feel very strongly that well-trained First Responders are essential to the optimal effectiveness of an ad- vanced life support emergency service. An audit just completed of outcomes of emergency calls for cardiac arrests clearly indi- cates that every minute saved in making an initial patient assessment and starting essential emergency measures is critical to the patient. Actions taken by the policeman, fireman, or knowledgeable citizen prior to the arrival of the paramedic ambulance significantly contributes to a positive patient outcome. SPONSORED BY THE FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF ST. PAUL, MN / 0 Mr. John Anderson June 7, 1982 Page Two I will be meeting with the police and fire chiefs of both Shakopee and Savage in the near future to discuss how we can further the cooperative efforts that have already been established between us and to discuss the educational issues. Thank you. Sincerely yours, Dorolyn M. Sohner Director of Nursing Services DMS:hme /1 CITY OF SIiAKOPEE BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT May, 1982 PERMITS ISSUED Yr. to Date Total Previous Year Number ' Number Valuation Number Valuation 5616-5641 MO. YTD. Single Fam.-Sewered 1 5 273 ,020 4 12 742 , 600 Singe Fam. -Septic - 1 78 , 500 - 1 75 ,000 Multiple Dwellings - 4 428 ,640 1 5 600,000 (Mo.Units) (YTD Units) - ( 14) ( 4) ( 14 ) Dwelling Additions 8 21 144,113 3 7 81 , 000 Other - 3 73, 780 Business District - - - - 2 240,000 Agricultural - - - 1 1 132 ,000 Industrial -Sewered - - - - - - Industrial -;septic - - - l 425 ,000 Accessory/Garages 8 15 80,625 3 17 100,000 Signs & Fences 4 18 25 ,933 . 50 4 4 14,400 Fireplaces/Wood Stove - 4 4,955 - 2 2 ,200 Grading/Foundation - 1 1 , 165 - 1 47 ,000 Remodeling (Res. ) 5 12 38 , 700 7 15 30,830 Remodeling ( Inst . ) - - - - 1 150,000 Remodeling (Other) - 11 698 ,648 1. 24 1 ,041 ,000 TOTAL TAXABLE 26 105 1 , 848 ,079 . 50 24 91 3 , 531 ,030 TOTAL INSTITUTIONAL - - - - 1 - GRAND TOTAL 26 105 1 . 848 ,079 . 50 24 92 3 , 531 ,030 MO . YTD . MO . YTD . Variances 2 6 - 1 Conditional Use 2 9 2 6 Re-Zoning - - - - Moving - - - - I; I � I i i � Permits �,:: 23 59 15 63 I'lmbg. & Iltg. Permits 6 54 21 75 Raring Permits Residential - - - - Commercial - - - - Total dwelling units in City after completion of all construction permitted to date 3 ,528 Cora Underwood Bldg. Dept. Secretary CITY OF SHAKOPEE BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IN MAY, 1982 5616 MN Stamp Co. 107 W. 1st Ave. Sign $ 500.00 5617 Lambrecht Const. • 781 S. Jefferson Garage 7,000.00 5618 Ann Annen 428 E. 2nd Fence 45.00 5619 Earl Bakken 1145 Merrifield Fence 750.00 5620 Ronald Johnson Rt. 1, Box 1000G Addition 26,300.00 5621 John Dellwo 2048 Eagle Creek Blvd. Addition 8,000.00 5622 Harvey Tesch 610 W. 5th Ave. Garage 8,700.00 5623 Alvin Rud 630 E. 4th Ave. Alteration 800.00 5624 Shakopee Sports Ctr 1038 East 1st Ave. Sign 2,800.00 5625 Lester Koehnen 640 McDevitt Deck 1,350.00 5626 Engle Const. 1026 E. 10th Ave. House 55,600.00 5627 Michel Swanson 856 Mirtflesota 19 Deck 4,000.00 5628 Cy Carlson 1230 Polk St. Deck 700.00 5629 Cy Carlson 727 W. Shakopee Ave. Shed 1,200.00 5630 Peter Robarge 337 E. 3rd Ave. Alteration 1,150.00 5631 Delphine Good 1025 E 3rd St. Garage 6,500.00 5632 Harold Zwart 833 Minnesota Addition 12,000.00 5633 Mark Houser 2021 Marschall Rd. Shed 700.00 5634 Clete Link 662 Adams St. Alteration 500.00 5635 Alfred Janousek 436 W. 7th Ave. Garage 7,800.00 5636 Rodney Bassinger 835 W. 6th Ave. Garage 8,340.00 5637 John Vohnoutka 423 W. 6th Ave. Alteration 450.00 5638 Imker Const. 1008 Shumway Porch 1,648.00 5639 Wm. Whipps Rt. 1, Box 332 Shed 6,000.00 5640 Wilfred Latour 322 E. 6th. Alteration 800.00 5641 Anthony Berens 911 Lewis St. Deck 578.00 $164,221.00 • / 7 MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (Regular Meeting) The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in regular session on May 3, 1982 at 4:30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room. Commissioner Bishop offered a prayer for divine guidance in the deliberations of the Commission. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Bishop and Nolting and newly appointed Commissioner Kirchmeier. Also Manager Van Hout, Superintendent Leaveck and Secretary Menden. Representatives from Jaspers Loosbrock, Mr. Jerome Jaspers and Jim Strefland also were present along with Odin Olson of R.D.R. •Inc. BILLS READ: City of Shakopee 20,032.00 Auto Central Supply 42.76 Bills Toggery 77.96 Boardman, Suhr Curry and Field 3,388.40 Burmeister Electric 544.75 Capesius Agency, Inc. 1,242.00 Clay's Printing Service 265.55 City of Shakopee 1,013.67 Condux International, Inc. 274.00 Copy Equipment, Inc. 1.70 Danny's Construction 210.00 Dunnings Hardware 10.49 Goodin Company 596.01 H & C Electric Supply 66.75 Hennens ICO 14.00 IBM 88.02 Krass, Meyer and Kanning 150.00 Lathrop Paint and Supply 18.16 Leef Bros. , Inc. 15.10 Minnesota Municipal Utilities 2,030.88 Minnesota Municipal Utilities 300.00 Minnesota Municipal Utilities 375.00 Kenny Menden 33.17 Merrill Lynch 50,000.00 Northern States Power Co. 287.65 Northern States Power Co. 181,588.65 Northern States Power Co. 878.17 Pitney Bowes 73.50 Power Magazine 11.00 Power Process Equipment, Inc. 128.61 Ring Fire Extinguisher 68.00 Schoell and Madson, Inc. 114.40 Serco 56.00 Siemens-Allis 323.37 Shakopee Hardware 47.92 Shakopee Lumber Co. 109.20 Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 190.21 Shakopee Services 18.00 Shakopee Valley News 130.14 Suel Business Equipment 12.32 Starks Cleaning Service 17.30 Sherri Theisen 5.70 Truck Utilities and Mfg Co. 53.31 Valley Industrial Propane, Inc. 11.14 Lou Van HOut 64.24 Water Products Inc. 141.38 Art Young 17.10 Ziegler Tire Service 52.86 Motion by Nolting, seconded by Kirchmeier that the bills be allowed and ordered paid. Motion carried. Motion by Nolting, seconded by Bishop that the minutes of the April 5, 1982 regular meeting be approved as kept. Motion carried. Commissioner Kirchmeier abstained because he had not attended that meeting. Manager Van Hout read a letter from John Anderson, City Administrator on the recent appointment of Mr. Barry Kirchmeier to the Commission. A letter from the City of LeClaire, Wisconsin regarding our participation on a proposed hydro plant in that area was read and discussed. Commissioner Bishop suggested that we acknowledge the letter from the City of LeClaire concerning a cooperative venture on that particular dam and that we continue to look into the matter. A letter from Mr. Steve O'Neill from the Shakopee Baseball Association thanking the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission on their cooperation with the free lighting for Riverside Park was acknowledged. Mr. John Wood was present to hear the discussion by the Commission on the letter from his attorney on tree trimming done on his property. The matter has been turned over to our insurance carrier. Motion by Nolting, seconded by Kirchmeier that any opinions or proposals on this matter be withheld pending notification from our insurance carrier. Motion carried. There will be an on-site inspection by Commissioners Nolting and Kirchmeier. The 1981 audit was presented by Mr. Jim Strefland and Mr. Jerome Jaspers from Jaspers Loosbrock and Co. Motion by Nolting, seconded by Kirchmeier that the City Administrator and the Utilities Manager work on a statement of the items to be included in the calculation of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission contribution to the City. Motion carried. Motion by Nolting, seconded by Kirchmeier that we accept the audit report for 1981 from Jaspers, Loosbrock and Co. Motion carried. Mr. Odin Olson from H.D.R. , Inc. presented a proposal for work on the circuit maps. Motion by Klrchmeier, seconded by Nolting that the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission adopt the proposal presented by H.D.R. , Inc. and engage them to draw the whole electric distribution system per the letter of May 3, 1982. Motion carried. P,2". Motion by Nolting, seconded by Kirchmeier that we review the insurance policies in June, 1982 and that we write the City Council a letter inquiring as to whether they have any changes in this area because due to the nature of our business and due to the nature of their business we have specific concerns. Motion carried. Our insurance agent will be requested to attend the June SPUC meeting. The possibility of advertisement on Shakopee Public Utilities Commission envelopes was discussed. A Brief update was given on the progress of Pumphouse #6 construction, the Minnesota Valley Electric Coop acquisition and the Northern States Power Co. acquisition. A letter from the Minnesota Department of Health, concuring with the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission concerns over the water system was discussed. Lou willmeet with Howe, Inc. and Lee Houser and report. Motion by Kirchmeier, seconded by Nolting to adopt new hourly rental rates for our trucks and man time as follows: Bucket trucks and man for one hour $42.10 Digger Derrik and man for one hour $52.10 Pickup and man for one hour $27.10 Motion carried. Commissioner Bishop recommended we refurbish our buildings electrical backup system before the summer storms come as soon as possible. The Levee Drive grant application was discussed. The Commission is in favor of getting an estimate of cost to underground the electric system in the downtown area, but do not have accurate figures at this time. Superintendent Leaveck reported no loss time accidents for the month of April, 1982 and 6 fire calls for the month of April for a total of 2 hours and 53 min. The next regular meeting will be on June 7, 1982 at 4:30 P.M. Manager Van Hout reported that Ken Menden has attained his class D water license. Motion by Nolting, seconded by Kirchmeier that the meeting be adjourned. Motion carried. '/?(;04,-11/74-- Lou Van Hout, Manager • ( l -_'ThH n v'n 0!----3-'•�a -__•=_:777-"-_•....1,-_7'_r_...-.. n ? - a.o a N"N_Y t 97n n_:" n a�•t -j vn♦ a u n n 9nn `ny'nj o,_•oY no cn o 7,21 n-.N^n•n aa (\e'''\ M\ 1 I I • .4 1- N U r• PI .• iP 0 .4M 410N U) NMM 0 • 1 • a M r,t ! oPNM oN10 0. • . • • • • • • • • • a • • • • •1 •• • - • • • •.• • ••• .O M M10 h10011 0MO1.4N1010 N o" M: .y a OoaaN0..1 P NON: NNCTN .IOII- N) 0: M ..1 a PMP••/N N10 W7 1 1 I 1 1. I- t t- l t t l ) t t l 1 I I 1 1 1 1. / 'F 1 1 1 I ~ CW L I 1. 1 1,il. I I t a U IOP M n a - 0 0 o 0 N) a i 0 0 U) 0 4 0 N' ra ,D C,4.o 0 0 0 0 0 t7 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o P O O O. 2 N C M OOU0 o0O N O Ino O T 000 O O as MOJ Oa aaa U)O to.Ll 0 00000 . a 0VIa a • • • I • •,• • • • • • • • • • • • • •, • • • • • • • •,• • •.• • • OM• I • •.• • •'• • ••• • 5.4 .r .4 N U)U)C)N.4 M U P N P or M0 lO r. ., 4., .i.4 0C; '2 Ul7N aa10 M O. c)c).•IaT 447.-1 C MN U) ONOOIU)M Ott 0N.II.cO.IoN MI U)O . ON0h0.000 10 O 0420iPh00 a .400 ci O M 4NMNOIi N.IMMM....i a .VM MNM..i .00N' U) O 00N P.P. 0.1 ? 4. • • • • • • •• •I • • • • • • • w w • w • 0.... • w • • N .41n P• .4M ..IT 4' t' NU) N..N U)P1OO' i o 00.401 '0T 1-1.01 0 W i t M N i. P, .4 4 N M 10 10 t N N t0 ( P h .• M .•' p. .4 r• ! M 1 < • 1 I N QJ < iM P 000 a O o O P a 100 a N o 0 o M a O 'pi o oe O o c)0o e0; i 'a ao0 e0le Mi o IA. O P 01 0 aaaa aaei O4O000 as Ot• .3000000 o 00 N a OO! M 000e 4)ON o O.U)O O ON • • • • • • . • •,• • • • • • . • • • I • •A• • •,• • • • • • • • • • '• • •,• • •'• • • • U 00 h 00 Ogah' NU)N(NOi00 O' i i O P.; 40! O 10 ONOv.= 10 t00 0 1-< NP o O.P rs i.4 In .4 P CO N.•CO e N o, I 01 I N 1 ii N' 0) o ni10'NNo1M Q 00 .4 MN .4..4' 04.a .44,41.4' M i 1 M N I f.I .11 i O OP.M N N 400 • • • • • ••• i• •i • CU)Ol i 'N i 1 n .1N M 10 U) N I P' 0M• 0 a MIO .0 .I N .4 .4 M < I I W • I i i I ••W . O J CJ 0 Q O C7 0 a a 0 0 0 n 7 0 0 0 a 0 000 O O O O O p 000 a O! O O O C O O a a G a it 0 c. o .-! es,1 C1 Ca parr; 0O0C)O0o 00 o 000474 t7 Ca:OO':•1 0 O O 0e 42,a000 C] W S . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •'• •- • • • • • • • • • • •'• • •I • • • •'• • •!• • •,• • D. ca a C20aCCC07gao42g0C2 o• 00 0 a0047gai i eaoagoaagoo W 10 10 .-. .a:,n oo Cl a.,ao lele0 miUla n 11)P a01.-.a 0, U) �ra.3 nno(' ..eu 0 .len .4 0.4000000000000 M ti 0 M.. O*0O M': O 000.740000 • • • • • • • • w • • a, '• • • • •i• • • • Ia • w,• • • • • a I • 100) .4 Ori .1010.0 .14 O! 0 i .INUl01Uf0!� O 'aMMU)0 N.INM) F- . N h M 4 .-4 .41 .1 4 N.I M 10 4. i N N, O :•1 V) P h ± 'I .•• IM N' 00 41 j •1 • w I i I , • I ' I I- I i i I LLI I I • - Oc W I ; I o u 2 I O. l I ; W C I j I a I C x ? 1 I Li Z ' I I o I I j 1 I 1 2 rJ a 0 .- 0 O0C)C)OoeU) OCOon00MCI M, e000OOCaOC7OC700al c . JOOC7OaanUll00 W 7 e- - ',r, r_• .., , , - 0' --, 4. -,• 71 111 O.,r- O• ,11 I. C,0,, n70 r.POa •4 O' r, 1,...,vO et1nea ,_) :r,n O N)- • I' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • /'.• •I • • • • •'• • •,• • • • • • 1 • ill • •:• • • • • •i• • 7 U 00 N dIO. O01.•1MoN42 N' N I N O hIn O 010 2Q 'a P. .4 P, Ml h M lt7 f IOM 10 N ,n ,r. , n� : M M O I N N N P.42 C N ti h I I O 1 O I 0 1 I C I . N N ; I 0 1 I I uW • 1 I I I 1 • I y • I • I i W i • j In . : 1 oX! I N W N N 1 44 1-1 I = U 2 II--• ...~.. IN" W 21. O' 4.111.i N W V) I O H r. W V) .. 240 •4 r- a L r- i- 2 V) -J U)U W 0 Z U)0 C Z V) r• 4 M.( 2' 0.4' 0 0 1 0 W W U W O C WW W M N 1- 00- WWW I- 2 N 43 0 a• r-. ' H O 1 .-. W04 2 U W 2 004 CO N J a00.4 W r.I a s W r.; W N OCC a. • O 0 W I I- U.0 i U 'I W W 02 01- N 22 w1- 1... 2 O.Y O, 2; 2 l! (30 N-r.S r+i 4 204 ' 0: O:W 0. U. 0 0rr W ..W N U P. H C cc •' 0'. N 1 2C0 H •Z44 J' U WO W 4.I'41 a 'a U.. 0 ... UM 00-1U0 ..-.2- MW 0 W a V)J W V) r-t ur a X.r; a• I (J .-. ?a)O W W W X Jr- at Z W M I...W N J 0 CC Cl N W LL H 7 J U w0-V)C .-.VI U a W C, U -2 ••' 0. <a.. ILL W V)1 J a W' W W: r .- C W 0 V)W: a t-r-L C;• 4.LL N V) 1 W 2 Mo. V) Uta .-.UWO- O. Jr44.JW 12 a NZ• <2a2W1- Z • < < •i a ZC <02WYhaC7 W V) h O >-. -•W(W V) 2 J « < 0- Z V) 40 C <C < IL > >1-01... £ 02.-I O U 2 Z N X 20 > 0 JU )-2 W0713COUC 0000 V) x000 OCr- JWO0> NC2, a• 040-WCQ41W WU LL WO W -401- X0 .42Zr4W 0 -. 2 .4 W' O W 0 0. 00L)2• >: 0LL0 >W C 2X ILC 0 OW ../...1 C J W r-.F- ...-• Z . 21.. S N' W W 1- • W = W►0. N1Y w W W O,U V) 0,1 > 0 a V) 0 n C •J: OCG 4 M0- W • Z U J N 0 W U W J J U W U r- ' I- W W 2 C 210 Ow > • • 0 W '3CCC7aU JJL SJLIUW UW W. ' -.W .1.......).... r-.QaI.-r+Z0. 2 JJ-• • .4 •2W WI- > Pm .-r- Z V) X 0 W a(NC7 U-0 U J 7 W 0 V) 0 U .30Z W 4Ja .aU0. a JM7 a 0 J10 CO (3a V) J0C I -. r. 0Z W-.• a •+W-•r+-.0 O '3 J W W W J r- -.r-. r+, w00114-01.- I-401.-0-000. , 0 < 40222'..10 <-10 I U 0 014. I- J 070]U Z 0 0. 0 0. 1 J1 1Q W V) Z LL J 0: i S 0 V)0.N U J a V)CL U N ' CO U> Q M W W a 4 V)O.N C N O 0. N N • .I NMC U)0..4 N r) d 4) 0 P. M Cr!.4 • U) 10 P M Co.4 N M O..Ca 4 O Cl • 'y)10 P CO 01 044 N M 141 ' 0 2 0 .4N • .4....4.4 .4 M M MM MM MM M M i a U r1 U c.N N N N M N)M M d t0 • 0000 O .4..1.4.4.1.4 0` Z c: ^) • I MN)MN7 on el N,,M MMM M MM a U) 47 0 U)U) U!U)U! 00 U) ti U. M M 0 M M M M)r)r)01 M M M M M 01 0,01 01 a M M M Nl on M r) M 01 M N)N)Nl 01 a r)M 01 M M M)n 01 M r)r) - I I NI 1. U ♦! O i♦ 10%0 U 10 n CL • • • • • • • • a••• •N I • • ♦ A .r .v N In 0 G r1.4 co ., ♦ M ,c0X40 w A 4O Or M CO - W. N O 0' W 1 1- 1 11 1 1 1 ► 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4I U 00 -.00110 O C:.OO C C-O Or,0 U NNC'A0 000 In O { 0.' Z C. C.CIO C040 C)C+C)C)O:O O 0:�O C A O O 0 O 0_, N in •• 0 U 4D IN C'C C. r, ,P♦q.N 40♦a,Cl W 0, CJ C', • C 01 D W ,10 O O'CO 40 O O O C• 1110.00W O1 . .4 w♦A !A:MN' .•Cpm: MANOA 01 A a • a • a a a NI -1 f ♦ N♦N C * oUD In N CO co' W i 11 . 1 .4 .•C0 ♦CO M In r , H r' O .V1 1 1 < I N I 0.11 1 1 . 1 4. O O O O CD AO O O IO O C)Ca Ci O b 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In ♦ U. O I CN 010 O OIb O CA C2 Ci OU 0 0 0 0 C.N.10 0 0 0 0 ♦1 ♦ O O H' • • • • •; • • •,• • • • • •I• • • • • •1• • • • •' • U It'; 40 IN 00 .400 m 0010 O 01 04 o)j 0.41 AI m 140 441♦ 0.4 T ♦O .• ♦ i 4 I 4 COI M IT pip m ♦ 04 M N .1 1 0 • } • • • • •1 •; CO .• Cr, N 1010 IN CO' { I I . M .• 40 i ! N Li 1 II. I ' Wi i O, C C) 0CP C?O0C)00100 O 00 C9+C+C, C•)00410 O ' C' ZI 0000000000000c. 000= 000000 0 0 W • •:4 • •;• • •1• • •:• • • • • • • • • • • • >1 0100 = 0000 0000 000040 o 40I 0, WI Ar.O IC)C.,C7 CI C7 0C)r Ci CCIC l UI r+ Mj 40' XI 17,4.40 !NOMPO CVMCDC OCN0A 0 W ♦ • 1 a a • • • • • NWI 4-I .M 1 .4 N N f m .o p N I W 0. I 1I N 0. I 1 H a ! j WI 0 Z1 a. `1 W CC j 1 ' a => I 1 I i Z J1 I I lI 4l 00 p 0 Olt C 0 - O O[7 O C')O O 04..1 O b 0 0 0 ♦ R I ! W 0! r_.O..C.r01.4r, c.ionr.'CC) r, uo ..40C)r.r.00r. COj V. Ai 1.- • • • • •I• • •I• • • • • • ,• • • • • • I• • • • • 1 ♦ > U 1 In Im OPO I 40 m .r♦ , 011 Zdj N ICO 0r4 .I 0 IN♦ NI pl -. W ..� • • • • A � a1 I► I I I C in N O CC ' = I ; I ; U W I 1 I I I I 1 I =; W'IP Ij 1 j I 1 a. j • 07 Wla VI • I ' NI JL j 2W Q N N W Y Lii 1 H W IW U i m { J 1 t0 h W CO 1 I I Z CDIU ►.fqO , 0 IV)a av)j J C) W al.. >W T O ,_ Li L.1.* ta a., 4 W Z a 41a JaKamhn CL I I W 02 =WOWe���r---III F-WIF- I J O 11-40 0071 0 0. ILO 4- U W O V)1L. N W C o)0 D U U. 22'. V) ✓.. U M 0-Cr NCLIM ly,!U r-O N Z •N o!•r Cl) W J Y r- ¢1-1 J W 1 . 1 W N Il W a to... 4.. .I W C w, .-1 CD R a W i 1 WI'C a. i V1 V1 Ui iilW�L W 01. ..114.101. ..114.11. CF.. a. ,! I Y a.- W O.C.>•-•1Y 2 r.IVJ N W a U N N J =O W 3.1 W O U) WW W0$.10•-IsOJW.JU'. .•021 O 0U H4Z > 11. 20 ILajC2 -, •bi0WJ2•- F-OCDOJ!U 00-2 '4 W U. WO p.IIS W O IN N 0.PW 4 O!2 .-.Z 0-J W W 0 W Q)J a I ' O OW i CD a U la N I U 2 W Z N 4 0 2 dJ 2 0.) Y O. 0..O 30I000ZW W10.00...lOF4-Z W *aa2W aj Za4Wa.IiU W •- ..,,a0-' .4v)COW VJ 2 v)L7 a aKl a i l-.wLL,O a r r a lL ll/) Z ', ►. O2 ZWIr4Or 0r.or.IUWObi.-+OIO4 WZWW►• 1-I U 0WiIIIV1NTI= UiI6LIa,y,i.H V).tIniU)ICJCDaNaCIC p1 N OU I 40 A IO O N IM A.4 1N M 0 0 0..4 N M 40 C.r.y 0 Q 0 p • M 2U) .It•'�.-IM NInNInINNMyMy��MNN�M�n!M♦In♦�n♦♦40..4Mr.4Mi!01 • ..4 �R t).1rl P7 F7 PI M IPI F7 P7 )4.r7 M h PI M M h h P))Mr�i n • 1 I I I 1 1 I I - n • O hrv2 � n,ih nn0O Yt e r N . Qnr\`�J�\-- N AIV n •In O OJO - - - • - - - N 44 1_0; . v�o N '1 .r I -r. n Ir ♦ • < f -- • f rr r n nj- . ( k..... L' 1. . .) r - I _ ._-..__. _.)_ r mo- - - .. r U W WNNn .1N .r NM N •V 0c000..004. .4N a' 0 1- •.1 • O. • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • W U)0 010 w IO C0 0'ID .-4.D;tt1 0' -0 0'N N 0 C 'C No .4 m O 0 ' 01 In N In In 0 ..i n N 0 r4 N .4 N .4 n.4 0 n N CTCV N N N W .. ID W 01 a U n N 0' N U)O n J N 0 m n O .,N V)4 O a -G 0 0 N 1-t N M n O N m C)0 0 o U) N t c. a Z t M N.4 n 0 f o O' o M U)u ID n CV p . 1r CJ n m IN n n 'O IO O n b N N7 0 m = IO. tIO C' Vr>a. n a • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 • • • • • • • • * Wei • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i .r USM US.rmN O' CON m U) .+r, UNNc.C: 0 5(5r^ NIt)m Nom, O' C: OtN C'0c. N - 42„) m I ., O _ m o 0'n Ui'!tC...N n 0' n 0 o 'C U N V o IO 0001:6.40•400 NMC 0 N 00 d o 4 NOINmO.1 IpOm 1.....I. 000. 000 m C .{+^NOrtO N •MnN U oN tV N N N Ues ) � > • • • • • • • • • a • • • •:• • • a ,• sass-a . . 011. 00 • N UN0000N min.1 m. WO Nn'IOM O' A A NIONN,mo O. .4101.4n N tN ID w w In n DI W O CNN.•NOI WIN SOP) m 0 IM -4n.-4N, .•1 ..1 ../ w In 0 ..I.1 r 0 f+ N .41 n ..1 ..1 Pc) 1 I 4 U) . O J ! 1 , II I 4 C.n M U U)o N O N 'D N N O O m 0 O G, .4 10 o o Lo n n o m N n O n N c a c> »N It) c• .. G L. U. 7 I00NmooN0C' C' .O0000Aet1, 0+ .oO nMnNMID nMtooNoID N 10M In O o 0 O o or- • • • • •.• • •i• •• 1 • • • • • •• • • • • •'• • • • • •,• • • • • • • • • • • • • • U .D...c.,nfl .m.... m' 0, 0 wry,. 0 M A0.161010O'0NU)Ip Cr, 0 .• U) MW MwMOA. 0MM) ID.. ON! 0..410 j U) n C'tV o0n U1 M{ M0 0 1. 0 6 C, U).1N T N 0010 N a m' N10 CO IO' U MWMICOM O; NC : M C' a • 5 5 • • • •1• •�. • •' •• •,• • 1• j• • 11.]* • •I •• • a •• :• 1 ¢ CNC H CO 0 1-10.-I N 1 0.-1 I N CO oe M n-. .0.1..1 01.1 W).4 ' ID u0 N N tV N M 1 Nn '4' .4 N I IO n IO 1 • 6 i M 1 to 1 I n n • o ! •'• '' p C O O' 0 010 01 u C p C'C•C C' O 0 140 0 100 0 IO O O Ri O O CO,O Ci o CO G C u O t: F`' oc)muctsocc.10 01 0 0 C a O C' O t`1 0 (G O O V O Ci C)O .C t✓OCC . r') c>Ca o G': C' C O 4 • • • • •'• • • • •1 • • • • • • • •, 0 • • 0:.• • •i• • • 0 • • • • • • • • I • I • • M N U)A if)M N O It7 • N 0=W00000, U) IO p O IU O(f)10 O 0 0 U')O V 0 ,0C1 O S 0 C7 O CC O 0 ie. C' *WINO W! 0uo N('I C" , r. .-1 imn It)NN C'M.•10' .. IDN C.4 Ifa cU') It) r r I .•, M N.•1 C N M..1 IO N': 0 N O N N U N O`O N '.+C C.1 N C' .. ' C-•1 U) ID m 0..1 w N N If) U) O •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • •I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a ¢ mUUMO`Nm.• 1.4 04.- 4,0.4.4.4U' ... !m MOO'.4U0 m 01-...en n 00' M .• N n M a m.rUmM.•10 n .4 ON' 000 mi n JN .• NMM N w 0 0 In N tt) 0. 0' In In w•1 .♦ 0 .-1 w I I 1rI ,i 1 F I CI a I ! I I al , w' I ! I WI U1 M' ¢I 1 yi S y l CI N i l I j x z , j r o I I i w tJ I { I a. NU)ot NIO .Doin O'1 o O'Ott)po M 10'co o In CONI'In Mr,n N 10'a oM 42 CD ICD oI o 11 C." C)! 7' N M co 0'N1", V)C,a Ni CC M C)CO M INC r.- m 0 r.. r'M o w r, N N h O N n<'.ID .r ,_50 I- t^I c, 1_. •.• j 1.0.. • • • • •,• • •I• • • •j• • •,• • • • 1• • •:• • •I• • • • • • • • •1 • • • I• •I • 1• • 2 0 •Io.1to0, CO N C01 InC01.-4 in MI NIC NON IO .•1N M N • In r ' I 24 f'•NRI/U) 0 M .11 N N (41010 m 0C'0 t n m 0 m.4 V); N j N N f ... .....Jr.i m - I . a I IIS I it: H, ... In ..' W 5 I• • • • i e' n• • • •'i • i• I• •' • • - 5 • �i 0. IO M O N I M M, 0104 42010,1 OI it 0•) n I 0 M ^I ID n n ¢ ! N I I Mi N .4 N 1 j W' ' j I I ' UZ I 1 a ; UC a 0 mla CL. I 1 N Z U1wz U . .) U• kol I ! I 1 W !< I V COM W� ; 4.J2 I J,h N0 N !. • Z ¢¢ ►+ M It.l W U►. O 2 v/ Cp .Z W ! Yn W W M >>'• l ¢ 4 • N •... I Z Z I O C W Z ..... a' I N tY O ZZt- NN 0 NI m Iar re J>N WN1 mil.-40 U 'O F. D N' r W! Z w5• I•m0.4 .r IO Zz W JIiF 7 WZ m ICW r.. Ur ¢ ;J2 r r� 1 le2 WI 7Z I MU 4 N0J1 00. 0 0 110.4W •' Z, Y U. O O' Cr •FJ .' 4-. r1 4 aJ •10' w 4 01.1..IW. ...COI -r M2 ,71 Ow' C. • O .r ...1 J a 4 W W C.I 7 1 ¢U m Z IM Z I W j 071 U U W HL U V) W 'm 0 Z Li a Y' .1.- JJµ U= LL Z fr ¢I W W w COI ¢ 1J t0 CO CL, dal W KJ 7 U I w W s' W ¢ ' al au.' JJ: w.-....WX W! r•7 waF-ILZI a t 7 1 7J7W•towu w 14,6z,,1tt} w! Up.. S' ¢w, WWII 4.11- WOW N, * JZIZ WH.1 M (ZM 001 mm W V) WI > '00 INC a; .. I 01 W¢, III I !I t r W • 5- I'- 10J C.)U OOU:772 m I W W 1 > 1- N Z U' N W t) 00 6000- J1 N = C N K N n••.w a 0�1U W l Zit a W 1W 1 MI CL ¢! W WO. WSW 22 !O Z4'. W WOY.Zt01.IZO.0�[ W 10WWO Z2... 0t]W MW N Owl J N; W W W 0, COW, •'•►'•M 0101(4)'.) .. Z! Or1 r , 00 ► IN• 0=..10-.4/0... M.¢i•p .J I* •4 W Z4 I N Z O C r¢ w•-.r Z a 0 J 4 i..J¢C]Id • J !W J a m W r Or M N W J W W W I Ce .S r F- CCI ��LC N Y I 4 tr w Cert 0 ) .J 0 1 0 U."*O J•-•J J 0. 11., <M W>Z C J r.4*U'N¢ U! W 'U•-• M W I r IC Z I.' M I.' J W.J¢ Z IZ .0 ¢W CI a ¢a r.+C M 4' O. 'O '0,.l1 ft m )w 1> ? Z,W¢ V): = U IL C. r 1 m ICC 4 04, 01 c '* W WL W OZ W, Z01mr W' 70:W OWC¢Zr WZZO;77s. r L,74 K Z' W W ¢. 0' 7 N O IV)a s la Z 7.7 0.1 V)4) +1 • :to 1W 7 O N Ia J a l-r a p1 7 0:r-...U 10 U S O CL 0 U 1.1 I G 0. r CO; 1 I . 'SiI, OU: oNC C'.4W O.HN • I 000 NOIN0N • p IO ON0 O!O 0 O.4 M)O'..t N O'! 0 ICON I• .•1i • c • W Z U o..r M 0 0'0 N 0 N •• w..1 N N M In 01 0 • ,..1.4 N N n It);ION m cO m O''C'M 0' • iC.4 ,• .1, • ... • O' a • :' N N N N N IN N N • In M n Itar�n M Yr)M M M M M n t 0 • i�O 'M t! 0 i w, C •i ! W W W • W W W W W 010 j • y r ♦- N -< r .c n m m to - N 1m o 01"8 n q la N I IN r, . ,n t, . r. r.N f' I, rJ l• n n .1 - N .r < cC V.< C.c n -.oip n J N N IJ J J N N�N I'1 0.R C. .1 .r'1 .I • f < < 01.11, n n rn, ,'"------N./---n • n r n r o J ...n• r C c :; ; ;—� _� 9 r n _ • _.__ .__ r n n n • --e s e c ;:i....^.- r n c n o -f . n n 1 Ni M IV I I a . I ~ in i I 0ta I W 1 41 U c c. r in c, a 0.I1 L IC r h c `• `• 1 .. ., N N III) n C. I D: o .I n If •h NICO IJ N N N N' CO'. ! ~ - , I I •., M 1 ••1 f I 1 U)I K 1 o.4 4.1 I a o n; a a a pl = a o a o f 0, O. • •, • • • • - ! 1 U I al r V), H .. t N • Cr 0 •C t• I ! I � I W 1 •.2210 or OoI 0 la 0 0 I I ►- c 0 o 0 0 0 a • • • • • ••; O N N 11) n o! eC: o''1 n W. of CI. a Cl ,q 0 �i pi • • 0 • •1 CC', N N KV 0. I,0 N a. , hI i i < 1 •I + I N I j j CC u 0 aI a i 1 W W V 2CC ACM CC ViC W ;S i Ce P- C Z I I ►' Cl ~ e no l o a o N 0 = DI <, o r• N z .-u . • • .I • co I a z 0. W •oil gr r X a ~I I I I W = i ( I { "�I I 1 i NCM K!Ia. I ! I �I I I I ! a. 0. I 1 i I I I I W i ! .. J W JI R j I I D K ,q �2 W 3 2 5 00. I O IA.H U. 1.-1 X J r C3 S a a W. W I/1 P. r Ka w41 U U =1 V) W Ce I+ U Z 2 4. 2 U Cl ! Z W W I I O GDW •C I. Z 2 1 j O S N 1- II+ r+ P. .•P.I ¢ n a 12 ••• I j •. Cl 2 W •t WO 0 o OI S .-'. a IIU U N 0 01 O N * !.4 • IT 0 :ft.• I IL. T v i IIT i I j �I n } .__-______,,s- N - • n . I. • •�—NIn . ntt , P N .7NN NI N A NIN Z nr+-, %I 'AI; A ga < : ': f V:i : I 'V nn nl; ,:`• ?, IIf/� Ai N O ^ 00 1-4 00^0 000 O, u1 O, a, CO u1O 0N000N M .74D .-10000ch0001 v 0 C, r- rD N - CO u1 d r', u1 Q` ,T .-i %D a, .-1 u1 O, O O O, u1 VD O '.0 M n! U \ ON I Op .-10 .-1 � .-+ MNOh4) vp ON MO VD Ch u1N r, .1- r, 00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i.+ r.{ \ L .7 •-1 M ,D .7Oj ,D SON NOS --' .r .-� Ou1Oa0 '.0 Nr- NI.n .7c cDu1 I I OOOOOO O M 00 N O, N- u1 O ,D vD 4D •-a r� 00 .7 ul U) m N CO N N u1 .--1M ••••••• .-1 .-a v • • M M a, C•1 W 00 •-1 -+ v .a .. rnM U) v N 1.r cO 0 - 4.1 •'11 a, M C. N M O, C. u") a, N O O O n O M n 00 CO vD CO u1 00 O0 ul 00 '� 'r7 rn -� I Na, I I N r-1O 11 N- N- Mr- N- M (1co '.0VD00 I ChN0 '.0O 1 01 1 1 I I 1 N C NC, 0 N000 .1- r- OO .1- .70101r-1r11- O .1- 00 CAu1OulMNrnM0LP000OO v a - I - 1 1 - - - I I O u1 M N CO r1 M N CINN u1 r--1 N VD in a I N N- 0 CO N l 0 I I I I I CI W CL>I Q W .7 .7 r-1 ^ r--I N r-1 r-1 M r-1 ul .7 r-♦ -1 N N N U) CO w 0 O N- O0o0O 0 --+ 00 00000 i1u) u1O .7 Mu1op 0 10 .700 %00 L.0 -r OOOu1 00 'U 1J O, 01u1 .7 .TO 1 .7u1a0O N u1 .Y10Ou1NN0100r- -, M 00601 00 +y •rl - I O, M 1p ul 10 un O O M 00 ,.., r.l I .7 M u1 1D 1 I 1 I I I O O 1J 1J ✓ 00 CO < 1r cV .7Oj u1 a, u1N 01 ON --ru 01 q) u100OMST .-1 r., OI NO VD � OOOOOOinO Co ,i7.). un 4-4 on .-4 on .moi N 40 O 00 0, .-1 r- -4 .-r N .7 N 4-4 a1 .7 10 10 00 b 0. •-+ -4 -+ O, 1D M 0 X N N .t CO W .-r >' N ilN CO CO - co ::.:2.21a) O, u1 0 u•1 r. O C, u) u1 r-I NCO N r-1 10::.:2.21r-1 C .t u1 ,7 M 00 N 0O I I I 1 00 N r-1 I I 1 I 1 0, O, I N- '.O cr1 I I I t o I M I 10 I I I CO 0 Or-1r- ah .1- -Ir- OO CO OMOOOOONr- OOu1MoOOOu10000ONOoO A •++ > CO co a, .7 M ,--4I I 1 I .-I i l l l I a I a al / I I - - I al all I U M H U 0) 10 ,-i N 0 N N r^-1 M r�i 0 >+ d• 04 N N N ,..-1 00 N wO 2O - 44 - w 10 .7O000u1O0u1r- 10al000C3 CD CD � 1Du1O0N0ut Oou1O 00 it .7MOOu1O .7OOr- 00 I O, O, O O u10, o • oO 00 MO, CD .-4 U1 -+ o0CD Oa, 1 OMAO 1 1 1 1 1 1 00 OVD N ,000gOMOr-+ MON O, u1Oj 000 -+ N O, u) r. MNO, 0, ,tu1Oj OMv000 1 1 000OaO 04 4444 on> Cr) .--1 r-1 C, CV M CO .--+ O M u1 -4 N01 M ul N N -1 10 D\ M CO N 0 CD 0Q R'+ - ,.I .-1 o .1 r� N a, N. N .7 N U1 M N n 00 00 •-1 00 Ch .7 N a, C, 00 u1 O, O M CO r- N n u1 .r N 00 N rr r- 00 U N 0 N- 0 0 M N- Ill O O, CO N. N. ^4 C, CO N 1,a In M •-/ 0 .r N a, a, u1 M a, N M ,Tr'' N100N ,1 M100M .7 •-1 a, op - r\ u100 •-+ 10r. 0 -4ulN10u1u1 ,II I I 1 1 I I 1 00 O, M CO r. M rne.n r\A IA u 1 N O O •-+ u1 u1 Cr, M u1 0 0 r` u1 oo u1 N. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '� "••1 M01t\ CO O, O .. 10 O, I I I I I I I I M ...r 00 N M - .-4 .--i 011 � C, ti 'ul ^i P. .t u 1 N -1 N N .-i N v M .-i rn v 00 b U 0 W 0•+-1 CO 0 .i-1 4.1 1.-)N M W N U) W. a •(1.) '0 v l+ v H 0• ci 0 (r) v uu(J) .-1 CO 0 1 4.J w 0 cn CO• U)b uupmo m Cr) > C C C v u E-+ 0-+O v > y p v 14 444 u v o v v v v v v •ri 0 C +•1 0 c •U crq v 0 C C C E C C C E > O E E EESE .-1 0 -1 v aal > > • A a v v v v v Cl) v ►+ . a v v v v v v +-+ v u Ia E n; • v E E E > E E E O E > > > > > > rn a 0 E• a+ 00 > >~ v 1. •. •ri 1 vvi v > > > ►o+ > > > � c ~ I°, 0 0 0 0 o v P • 0 � 0 a o 01 x W •.i CO 0 0 0 04 0 0 0 N • as aa. a. a0E-+ +-+ H C I. ' 1--i .i (0 v' ate+ FG -0 I.iw H E la >•+ L+ cn •.i a.+ E E E E E E 0 a v E. v E TJ >, I 0 a a a 1-4 a. a• a 3 Fit cn 1-. -1 H H H H (z, r•i v ,� E C col col cL w u .-i u •-1 h E E E E E E ,--I A u 3 u u > 1-1 C v C v ,y, I I.1 I-+ •rl x H H H Ora H H 1-1 CC) < O -0 Q. I-, Q• ol Fla I./ 0 •r1 0 U) N Q. N k' C •r1 b I. a a CO •a A • O Ix 1-, N M o• n .7 u1 1D r- n ri Q, O 4 .II N N 3 T -rl U > Z O0 W 0 v co M 0 I .-i 0 I-+ • r--i 10 r- n - r� N. r� t\ n t` r- 00 u 00 CO CO W Cd •.i a.+ ro C 1 In O, ID L0 1-) w a x v v ac w a rn c� a - - - - - • - - _ _ _ _ o - - - cn a w w H a4 -i -, 0 ^a •-•1 N M u1 r- N M .7 •-4 10 n .-1 N u1 10 r-- co O, .-+ N M „..Ti U O ^' ^-I •-+ •-1 •-1 N N N M M M .7 u1 10 n coOO O, O N. CON M .7 00 10 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .T .7 u1 u'1 +1'1 un u1 u'1 u1 u1 ul � n W CO CO CO CO CON 10 I TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ .REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA JUNE 15, 1982 Mayor Reinke presiding 1 ] Roll Call at 7 :OO, P .M. 2] Continuation of Board of Equalization a] Eugene Pearson Property - 27-001182-0 b] Doris Dunlap Property - 27-004007-0 c] Eugene Hauer Property - 27-908068-0 d] David Burt Property - 27-932002-0 e] Elmer Marschall Property - 27-917004-0 f] Viking Steel Inc . Property - 27-906054-0 g] Warner True Value Hardware Property - 27-906052-0 h] Cletus Link Property - 27-106001-0 and 27-106002-0 Close Board of Equalization as of June 28 , 1982 ; Follow-up Report 6/29 3] Move that the findings of the Board of Equalization be approved and sent to the County Auditor for certification, as of June 28 , 1982 4] Approval of Minutes of June 1, 1982 5] Communications : a] Cletus J . Link re : entrance/exit for Shakopee Housing Apts 6] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 7] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS : 8] Old Business : a] Special Assessment Interest Abatement - Robert Friendshuh properi b] Report on Weinandt Acres Interest Charges - Report coming c] Proposed Lease Between City and Shakopee Job Service Office d] Appointments to the Ad Hoc Energy & Transportation Committee e] Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses for 82/83, tabled June 1st - memo on table Tuesday f] On and Off Sale 3 . 2 Beer Licenses for 82/83, tabled June 1st - memo on table Tuesday 9] Planning Commission Recommendations : a] Amendment to City Code providing for special provisions for the moving of accessory structures b] Final Plat of Hauer 2nd Addition, lying E of Austin St , W of Hauer' s 1st and S of 11th Avenue - Res. No. 2004 c ] Vacation of Atwood and Fuller Streets - Res. No. 2016 & 2017, Setting Public Hearings 10] Resolutions and Ordinances: a] Res. No. 2013 , Appointing and Setting Forth Rules of Procedure for the Building Code Board of Appeals b] Ord. No. 96, Prohibition of Building Permits Upon Easements c] Ord. No. 94, Amending Liquor, Beer and Wine Licensing and Regulations Relating to Payment of Taxes 11] New Business: a] 8 : 30 P .M. PUBLIC HEARING - Valley Industrial Blvd. So. from CR83 to East line of Valley Park 2nd Addition, Proposed Assessments to Roadway Improvements (appraisal information to be provided) TENTATIVE AGENDA June 15, 1982 Page -2- b] Res. No . 2015, Adopting Assessments for 82-2 Valley Industrial Blvd. So. from CR83 to E Line of Valley Park 2nd Add'n. c] Res. No. 2014, Accepting Bid on Valley Industrial Blvd. So. from CR83 to E Line of Valley Park 2nd Add 'n. d] Change Order No. 2 for VIP Sanitary Sewer Interceptor 81-1 - increase in amount of $2 , 270.00 e] Ice Arena Lease with Shak-O-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc. f] Budget Worksheet Format Proposal g] Site #31 Shakopee Sludge Farm - Designation of representative to attend MPCA Board Meeting on July 13, 1982 , at 9 :00 A.M. h] Property and Liability Insurance i] 9 : 30 P.M . On Sale and Sunday Intoxicating Liquor Licenses 82/83 - memo on table Tuesday j ] Liaison appointment to Planning Commission beginning July 1st k] Authorize payment of bills in amount of $232, 986.65 12] Consent Business : a] Authorize Use of Rodeo Arena by Chamber of Commerce on August 7 & 8, 1982 b] Renaming of County Road 83 c] Authorize purchase of Quest Sound Instrument 13] Other Business : a] Engineering Monthly Report - informational b] The ICC has invited the Planning Commission and the Council to its July 14th Meeting from 5 to 7 PM to discuss "how best to" promote community development (residential , commercial and industrial ) and also to coordinate these activities c] d] e] 14] Adjourn to Tuesday, June 22nd, 1982 for a Work Session. 1 John K. Anderson City Administrator ��it � } �-�"141 /� ,:a: f r -'t'�a,., y 129 East First Avesiut. Shakopee. Minnesota 53379 MEMO . TO: Shakopee Board of Review' - Fame Robert N. Schmitt, County Assessor's Office • SUBJECT: Eugene PParsnn prnparty DATE: June 11, 1982 PARCEL NO. 27-001182-0 • • Mr. Pearson had requested a recheck of his floral store located at 112 Sommerville Street in Shakopee. The buildings on this property having been constructed in 1980-81. Mr. Pearson felt that the 1982 estimated market value of $130,400 was. excessive. • Terry Morgenson from our office rechecked the building on June 9th, 1982 and adjustments were made from the information received on that day. The main building which has 3136 square feet on the ground floor remained the same as it had been prior to the recheck. The value on this portion of the pro- perty is at $91,403. The garage which the previous assessor had noted as part heated, and part unheated, was also valued the same. The reason for the lack of change on this structure being the fact that part of the garage (432 square feet) , has a basement under it and the rate used on this would be correct for a garage with a basement. The remaining portion of the garage (240 square feet) , has. - the correct rate for this type of structure and no change was needed in our opinion. The value for the air conditioning used in this building was adjusted from $2.90 per square foot to $1.00 per square foot after it was found that only the main level of the building utilizes the air conditioner and the tonnage • requirement and subsequent cost are reduced. The total reduction in taxable value on the property amounted to $5,900 from the original value of $130,400. •, The new value corrected to $124,500. Mr. Pearson was informed of this adjustment on June 11th and still expressed disagreement with the figure and stated that he will contest the value in court. • •• C e111 \" *� First /,129 East Avenue, Shakopee. Minnesota 55379 I y .,y .r ., _....,_,. ,s, .:ec• „,,, ............,,,..,. MEMO ' TO: Shakopee Board of Review FROM: Robert IT_ Schmitt, as nt.v Aq p snr's Office SUBJECT: Doris Dunlap Property DATE: June 10, 1982 #27 004 007 0 Mrs. Dunlap appeared before the Board of Review on June 7th and was concerned with an increase given to her property for the 1982 assessment due to a reassessment. This increase amounted to $3205. After rechecking this property today and getting additional infor- mation on the property from Mrs . Dunlap, I would recommend that the value for the 1982 assessment be placed at $37600 for land and build- ings. This recommendation is based on the facts that the house is constructed of concrete block walls, cement floor, no full bath, no central heating system, no basement and because it was originally a machine shed which has been converted into a home. Mrs. Dunlap has •agreed to,this valuation for her property for the 1982 assessment. r`o1 d. �.► .� �. , - —-- -- ____ — - wirp ;ef • 129 East First Avenue, O ��� ,�,;.. � Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 `\, -1,:. f i rti� .;,..t../..-..:-1.t , MEMO TO: Shakopee Board of Review ______ _- -, _._ _ ______ _ ._ __ _ _Y _ FROM: Robert N. Schmitt, Scott County Assessor's Office _ _ - ___ SUBJECT: Gene Hauer property _ _ June 10, 1982 DATE: --- -- - ---- --- PARCEL NO. 27-908068-0 Mr. Hauer had expressed concern over the large increase in valuation placed on the structures on this parcel due to the assessment of pre- viously untaxed buildings. After meeting with Gene on this matter' and receiving additional information on the ages and correct sizes of the structures, this value has been adjusted. The correct value that Mr. Hauer and the County Assessor's Office has agreed upon for the structures for the 1982 assessment should be $39500. This is a reduction from the original value.of $60100 and is due in part to correct information on age, size, and in the case of three grain bins, the removal from the tax rolls due to no found- ations. ORIGINAL 1982 ASSESSMENT ADJUSTED 1982 ASSESSMENT . 1981 Pole Shed $ 1215 (Partial Completion)$ 1215 1945 Garage 4140 3772 1930 Garage 682 682 1945 Barn 5070 5070 1955 Silo 1000 900 1945 Granery 532 266 •- 1950 Quonset 2000 960 3 3000 Bu. Bins 5400 0 2 5000 Bu. Bins 6000 2800 1 4000 Bu. Bin 9600 (Size correction) 1120 3 10000 Bu. Bins 8000 13500 1 10000 Bu. Bin 10200 .' 5000 1960 Machine Shed 3000 3000 1950 Machine Shed 3190 1100 1950 Tool Shed 80 80 Total $60109 $39465 e `�ttla.�. V 1. �r .1. a� ..� a.4r46�% v dr �s err ` 71.'(*, , t 129 East First Avenue. Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 i' l 1f1 MEMO ' TO: Shakopee Board of Review - FROM• Robert N. Schmitt, County Assessor's Office SU'BJECT:David Burt Property DATE:_ June 11, 1982 #27 932 002 0 Mr. Burt, lives on a 5.00 acre lot in section 32 of Shakopee. He has a 2-story home of 1,060 square feet. The garage is attached and has 546 square feet. The plumbing fixtures are 1 full bath, 2-i: baths, 1-3/4 bath. The house also has 2 fireplaces. The outbuildings are comprised of a shed 17 x 19 which was first assessed for 1982 with no building permit discovered for the shed. There is also a closed porch which was added in 1982 of 280 square feet. Mr. Burt questioned the increase in value which was placed on his property for the 1982 assessment. The increase was for $9220 and resulted in the 1982 value of his property to be placed at $106,700.. Of this, the new porch added $2500, the new shed. added $2200, and the remainder being the result of slightly higher rates..used by the County for this type of a home ($4520 increase from, rates) . - The above value is consistent with what would be used on a similar property and I believe the value to be equitable and correct. I have left a message for Mr. Burt with his son on June 9th stating the above and I will also send Mr. Burt a copy of this memo. • , C ^ of frIr-„• CITY u i• 11. A It V i`` • L 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 MEMO . TO: Shakopee Board of Review FROM: Robert N. Schmitt, Scott County Assessor's Office SUBJECT: Elmer Marschall property DATE: June 9, 1982 PARCEL NO. 27-917004-0 • The increase in the taxes on Mr. Marschall's property for payable in 1982 were due strictly to the increase in Green Acre values used in the county and also to the increase in the mill rate. After checking Mr. Marschall's 70.0 acres I would recommend that the grades stay as they have been since 1980. These grades were as follows: Grade C 66.00 acres • Wood Lot 3.00 acres Roads 1.00 acre I have contacted Mr. Marschall on this problem and he is in agreement with our office. • r t cpi t" . C 4. ® �,I , r 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 5379 MEMO TO: Shakopee BQari of Review FROM__. Robert N. h_mitt. County Assessor's Office SUBJECT: Viking Steel Inc. Property DATE: June 11, 1982 #27 906 054 0 Ray Peterson and I met on June 10th to go over the valuations on the buildings for Viking Steel. Ray had some questions as to the depre- ciation amounts given to the shop buildings which were constructed in 1955 and 1969. Also, there was a question on the segregated cost rate 'for the siding on the office portion of his building. After discussing the life expectancy on the shop buildings it was agreed upon that the depreciation rates on these buildings should be increased. The shop buildings which were constructed in 1955 were given a deprecia- tion rate of 30% rather than 20%, this dropping their net square footage rate from $6.30 to $5.50. The shop building which was constructed in 1969 was given a depreciation rate of 20% rather than 10%. The result being a net square footage rate of $6.30 rather than $7.05. The rate on the office portion of,Mr. Peterson's buildings was decreased from $12.00 to $10.25 due to the cost of placing and purchasing the siding used to cover the exterior of the office building. The above adjustments resulted in a corrected valuation on the buildings of $85300, down from the original building values of $93300. The total new valuation now being $149,900, down from the original value of $157,900. Mr. Peterson and the County Assessor's Office are in agreement on these new values. r t .�,,.. :kr, 4.4.....a. lab .�.a. ,Sv✓- ....m. ,uaeami ya:sx.s �j`{� '4" It/02' 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 \Vl t 1 n \'. 15, 1 MEMO • TO: Shakopee Board of Review . FROM: Robert N. Schmitt, County Assessor's Office SUBJECT: Warner True Value Hardware Property • DATE: June 11, 1982 #27 906 052 0 • Mr. Lee Neuschaefer, from Property Assessment Advisors, Inc ., whc is representing the above property owner, appeared before the Board of Review on June 7th to voice a possible disagreement with the 1982 assessment value placed on this property. For the record this property has a current value of $208,000 on the land (16.90 acres) and $842,500 on the buildings for a total property value of $1,050,500 for the 1982 assessment. Leroy Arnoldi, the Chief Deputy Assessor for Scott County, and Mr. Neu- schaefer will be meeting in the coming week and Mr. Arnoldi may have something to report to the Board at the June 15th meeting. • f f C -"of,'"'r'„!` 4.1 Jr. Jar i. �r 4.11is .-..as-77r .r .rw was fi 12 Eases- First Avenue, Shako c +.. Shakopee, Minnesota. 55379 J p ' ♦i , "2--ki MEMO Tp. Shakopee Board of Review - FROM: Robert N. Schmitt, Scott County Assessor's Office SUBJECT: Cletus Link Property • DATE: June llt 1982 #27 106 001 0 & #27 106 002 0 Mr. Link had a question on the value of the duplex situated on the parcels listed above. His question was in regard to the percentage of completion used and if the value when completed would increase in direct proportion. The structures on this property were calculated as being 20% complete for the 1982 assessment. The value on each half of the duplex being • $7200 and the value of the land for each parcel being $7500. When . the structure is completed the value for the land will not increase due to the completion of the duplex unless our land rates for Shakopee increase. The building values 'w-iT1 naturally increase depending upon the type of finish and extras which are constructed. The answer to Mr. Link's question then would be that no, the total value for land and buildings will not increase by five times due to the 80% construe- • tion it will take in our opinion to finish the duplex. The buildings ` are all that are concidered in a partial completion percentage. • . pE .:,'cr CITY OF SHAKOPEE • . 12S' East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 '` • t � MEMO . .1.D. Shakopee Board of Review - noM: Robert N. Schmitt, Scott County Assessor's Office SuBIEcm Vacant Lot Values in Plats of less than 3 years- in age DATE: June 14, 1982 My opinion was asked on the following resolution passed at the May 12, 1981 session of the Shakopee Board of Review: "Harbeck/Reinke moved to direct the City Assessor to correct . any lot valuations on those plats that are eligible for the 3 year grace period on new developments as needed to concur with the County.". The Minnesota State Statues Sec. 273.11 Subd. 1 and Sec. 273.12.state: "In valuing real property which is vacant, the fact that such property is platted shall not be taken into account. An individual lot of such platted property shall not be valued in excess of the assessment of the land if it were unplatted until the lot is improved with a permanent im- provement all or a portion of which is located upon the lot, or for a period of three (3) years after final approval of said plat, whichever is shorter. When a lot is sold or construction begun, the assessed value _ of that lot or any single contiguous lot fronting on the same street . shall be- eligible for reassessment." Fot the 1982 assessment, it is the policy of the Scott County Assessor's Office not to increase lot values in a new plat until the three year grace period has expired or until the lot has a structure built upon it. No consideration is given to sales in a new plat or to lots adjacent to and fronting on the same street as the improved or sold lot concerning the increase in value on those lots . -• I would recommend that Shakopee also follow the same procedure concern- ing vacant lots in new plats starting with the 1982 assessment. Note: Replats of existing plats are not given, an additional three year grace period. I- t ,,,,ofuw:,. CITY OF SHAKO ' EE ,,� .. . 129 East. First Avenue, Shakopee. Minnesota 55379 '\'' 4:4... s't ly MEMO . TC _. ••-- :•_ r• • :— — . - FROM: Robert N. Schmitt, County Assessor's Office StJa1ECT.: V lues on Vacant vs . Improved lots in Shakopee-and Scott County DATE: June 14, 1982 Mr. Clete Link brought up a question at the June 8th Shakopee Board of Review concerning the value on vacant residential lots in Shako- pee (those not eligible for the three year grace period). He thought ' the values were excessive on those lots in relation to lots with- homes or other structures on them. I have been studying this question concerning Shakopee over the last few months. I have talked to various builders and private owners of residential lots in Shakopee about this problem .and I have found that there is a discrepancy in values between vacant residential lots with- in the cities proper of Scott County. The cities most comparable with Shakopee, Prior Lake and Savage, .have their vacant residential lots at about -50% of their improved (with structures) lot values. Shakopee - currently is assessing vacant residential lots in the city proper at roughly 60% on average. However, certain plats are much higher than • the 60% average. These would include the plats of East Sahkopee - 74, Jackson View - 99%, Eagle Bluff 2nd - 100%, JEJ 2nd - 93%, Minnesota • _ Valley 2nd - 100% and Patricia's 1st - 100%. My recomm ndation on this type of residential vacant lot would be to place theestimated market values at 50% of the improved lot values for the 1982 assessment. This method of assessment to change when the method - used for vacant lots in other cities of Scott County also changes.. This method to be used on all plata in the city proper of Shakopee. Also, if .. needed, to correct the vacant lot values in plats of rural Shakopee to place them fairly with lots of similar types in other parts of the County. OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JUNE 1, 1982 Mayor Reinke called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. with Cncl. Leroux, Vierling, Lebens, Wampach and Colligan present. Also present were Julius A. Coller, II, City Attorney; John K. Anderson, City Admr. ; Jeanne Andre, Admin. Ass't; H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk. Lebens/Vierling moved to recess to conduct an HRA meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Lebens/Leroux moved to re-convene the Council meeting at 7:10 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Additional persons present for the selection of the Cable Communications proposal were the Ad Hoc Cable Communications Committee (CCC) consisting of Gene Foudray, Eileen Christensen, Barry Kirchmeier, Randy Gorman, Lillian Abeln, and Lee Davis. Also present was Cable Counsel Adrian Herbst. Mayor Reinke asked if there were any questions or comments from the Council or CCC. Cncl. Leroux apologized for his absence at the last Council meeting when the cable proposals were considered. He also stated he wished to take exception to the news- paper editorial which saw fit to attempt to dictate to the Council as to how they should make a judgment decision. Cncl. Leroux also stated he would like to explore further Cncl. Lebens' concerns regarding City liability and the impact of non-cable pay T.V. He stated this con- cern is not so much one company over another, but the whole cable idea. He stated with technology changing so rapidly in this field, if there are major changes in non-cable T.V. in 5 years, what will this do to the citizens of Shakopee who have invested in one of the cable companies which has a great amont of dollars invested here. He also sees a problem with the 2 million dollar difference in investments between the two companies, as no one is giving away 2 million dollars, and someone will pay for it. Mr. Herbst stated that if the Council's concern is whether or not the City is ade- quately protected, this could be better addressed when the Council sees the fran- chise ordinance. He stated there are a lot of things that can be put in the fran- chise ordinance to keep the City on top of the operation, and these can be futher explored in the adoption of the ordinance. Mr. Kirchmeier stated that the CCC believes, after its two years of research, that the franchise ordinance will protect the City from all risk in the future. The City should not have any more risk than in the granting of any other franchise. He stated that even though one company is planning to spend 2 million dollars more than the other, it should not be assumed that it will be raising the rates to cover this expenditure. The pay-for-view that will be offered is a great source of reve- nue for the company. He also stated the earlier completion of the line extension area by the one company is an important factor, as this brings in more subscribers earlier. He also stated the CCC looked at both the company's operations in other communities, and found the rates had not been raised unrealistically. Cncl. Wampach asked about TVQ. Mr. Kirchmeier answered that TVQ was far more ex- pensive, and it only offers one channel. Further discussion followed. Colligan/Vierling moved to approve the selection of Zylstra-United's proposal as recommended by the Ad Hoc Cable Communications Committee, and further to authorize the Ad Hoc Committee to prepare a final franchise ordinance granting a franchise, using Assumption II, to Zylstra-United. The final franchise ordinance prepared by the Ad Hoc Committee to be considered by the City Council in accordance with the ordinance requirements of the City of Shakopee. Roll Call: Ayes; Lebens, Vierling, Colligan, Reinke Noes; Leroux, Wampach Motion carried. Shakopee City Council June 1, 1982 Page 2 Leroux/Vierling moved for a 5 minute recess at 7:30 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Lebens moved to re-convene at 7:34 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Lebens/Vierling moved to approve the minutes of May 18, 1982 as kept. Motion carried with Cncl. Leroux abstaining. Harry Weinandt explained his objection to the 26 months of interest charged on his assessment for road improvements in Weinandt Acres. He stated the road was not completed by the time it was supposed to be, and the $200 per day penalty was not imposed as was agreed to in the contract. He stated the road still isn't completed. He doesn't think this amount of interest was ever charged in the past, and doesn't think it is right. Considerable discussion took place regarding the interest rate, date of bond sale, reason for the road not being completed on time and interest cycle on assessments. The City Admr. stated the number of months that interest is charged is not unique to Mr. Weinandt. A number of people have had 20-26 months of interest added to their assessment. This is caused by a problem with the system as far as the interest cycle. Discussion followed. Colligan/Leroux moved to table this item and refer it to the City Attorney for fur- ther study and recommendation. Motion carried unanimously. Liaison reports were received from Councilmembers. Mayor Reinke asked if there was anyone present in the audience who wished to address the Council on any item not on the agenda, and there was no response. Discussion was held regarding the plumbing variance previously given to three blocks in Patricia's Add'n and its ramifications. Leroux/Colligan moved to amend the Council motion of 2/16/82 for Lots 1-6, Block 11, and Lots 1-6, Block 12 of Patricia's Add'n and require the sewer and water lines be placed outside the building with individual lines extended to each unit. This eli- minates encroachment and future maintenance problems. He also moved that prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for Lots 1-6, Block 13 of Patricia's 1st Add'n, staff be required to ensure that the six units have the necessary easements to maintain the utility lines and that the protective covenants for said property ensures res- ponsibility for maintenance of the lines. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Leroux/Vierling moved to direct staff to bring back more information regarding ap- pointing Council members as Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling moved to direct staff to study and come back with a recommendation for a more appropriate commuter parking location, and to refer the matter of park- ing in the downtown business district to the Downtown Redevelopment Committee. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Wampach offered Resolution No. 2001, A Resolution Establishing a Policy For Issuance of Parking Permits, and moved its adoption. The City Admr. summarized the resolution. Motion carried with Cncl. Colligan opposed. Colligan/Leroux moved to authorize the issuance of an electric permit to Rubber In- dustries, prior to completion of the screening on the west, upon submission of a letter placing on escrow the sum equal to 125% of the estimated screening costs. Motion carried with Cncl. Lebens opposed. Leroux/Vierling moved to direct staff to determine the best way to transfer $30,692 from the General Fund to the P.I.R. Fund with the 1983 budget process, to reimburse the P.I.R. Fund for an inappropriate use. Cncl. Lebens stated she wants a more thorough examination of the P.I.R. Fund for 1972-1977, because she is of the opinion there should be a couple hundred thousand dollars that were taken from this fund inappropriately for use in other projects. Discussion followed. Leroux/Colligan moved to amend the motion to direct the Finance Director to work with Cncl. Lebens in attempting to identify additional funds that may have been inappropriately taken from the P.I.R. Fund, to be researched prior to the 1983 budget process. Motion to amend carried unanimously. Main motion as amended carried unanimously. Shakopee City Council June 1, 1982 Page 3 r Lebens/Vierling moved to direct staff to efrthe ergstion'scrrequest ried regarding. frozen water services to the City's insurance agent. ue st Duane Marschall responded to the insurance agency's comments regarding his reqo to build over a sewer easement, that the line has been in place for 20 years, he doesn't think it should settle any more. He also added the line is 21 feet down, so there isn't much problem of it freezing. Considerable discussion followed regarding precedent this would set, time factor to remove the structure in an emergency, ability of the homeowner to prevent the City from removing the structure to get at the line, and adequacy of a recorded encumbrance on the property for line acess. Leroux/Lebens moved to deny Duane Marschall's request to build over a sewer easement, and instruct staff to draft an ordinance stating that no permanent structure may be built on an easement, and detailing what temporary structures may be placed on an easement held by the City. Jerry Theis stated he will be building the garage for Mr. Marschall if it is allowed. He stated that if the line has to be reached now, the City would have to take some measures to protect the garage that is there now. He asked about routing the line around the garage. Discussion was held about moving the line and the easementschall The City Engineer estimated the cost would be about $5,000 to $7,000. Mr. stated this idea is interesting to him, as the 50 feet is worthless to him now. Motion carried with Cncl. Colligan opposed. Leroux/Lebens moved to direct staff to meet with Mr. Marschall to come up with a method for moving the easement to the west to expand the buildable area of Mr. Marschall's lot. Motion carried unanimously. The City Engineer stated the Pass property on Levee Drive was apased by the Campbell Appraisal Co. , and they state that based on very goodcomparables, there would be no increased value to this property as a result of this proposed project of the extension of Levee Drive. Therefore, in order to fund the extension of Levee Drive, the Tax Increment Funds from the elderly highrise would have to be used to finance the extension of Levee Drive from Atwood to Scott Street. Discussion continued. Lebens/Leroux moved to direct staff to secure all necessary easements and rights- of-way for the extension of Levee Drive to the west only. Motion carried. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Leroux/Lebens moved to direct the City Engineer to proceed with the plans and speci- fications for the extension of Levee Drive from Atwood to Scott Street. Motion carried. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Lebens/Wampach moved to clarify that the Levee Drive extension project is to be financed with Tax Increment Funding from the Senior Citizens Highrise. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Leroux offered Resolution No. 2011, A Resolution Calling A Public Hearing on Establishment By the Housing and Redevelopment Authority In and For the City of Shakopee Of a Downtown Redevelopment Project and a Downtown Tax Increment Financing District And On the Adoption of a Redevelopment Plan and a Tax Increment Financing Plan Relating Thereto, and moved its adoption. Ass't City Attorney Rod Krass explained some of the improvements that are contem- plated by the Downtown Redevelopment Committee with the captured Tax Increment dol- lars. These would include the improvement of the parkingglot tlon nsSecond condenv . ,st green space incorporated within this parking lot, streetscape on 2nd Ave. & putting wires underground on 2nd Ave. He explained that these plans are long-range and phased. They plan to start modestly and not expect all the projects to be financed by this first Tax Increment District. He explained the tight time schedule they are on, because of a change in law that takes place July 1, 1982, after which time the City would not be able to capture the increment from the First National Bank addition. Shakopee City Council June 1, 1982 Page 4 Mr. Krass introduced the members who were present from the firm of O'Connor and Hannan, Bond Counsel, who have been working on a draft of the creation of the redevelopment district. Jim Casserly, Atty. , stated that his company mainly represents cities to help them with IRB issues and GO'Bonds, and help design public development programs. Arlin Waelti, Atty. , explained that the Downtown Redevelopment Project defines the area where you can make planned public improvements. Within this project area there are three Tax Increment Financing Districts, which are prior planned improve- ments. In the future, other Tax Increment Districts can be identified within this Redevelopment Project. Marytblzahn stated that she works with the computer regarding the financial area. She showed a computer print-out which she stated represented a planning tool, and at this point is just an illustration of what can be done for Shakopee with regard to these Tax Increment Districts. She further explained the figures she used for this illustration. Motion to pass Resolution No. 2011 carried unanimously. Leroux/Wampach offered Resolution No. 2009, A Resolution Declaring the Adequacy Of A Petition And Ordering Report On the Improvement Of the Alley In Block 106, Origi- nal Shakopee Plat, and moved its adoption. The City Admr. summarized. Motion carried unanimously. Lebens/Wampach offered Resolution No. 2010, A Resolution Declaring the Adequacy Of A Petition And Ordering A Report On Improvement of the Alley In Block 50, Original Shakopee Plat, and moved its adoption. Motion carried utnanimously. Vierling/Wampach offered Resolution No. 2008, A Resolution Declaring the Adequacy of a Petition and Ordering Report on the Improvement of Block 2, Timber Trails, Scott County, Minnesota, by Storm Sewer Lateral, and moved its adoption. Leroux/Vierling moved to table Resolution 2008. Motion carried unanimously. Lebens/Leroux moved to receive the Petition for storm sewer lateral construction in Timber Trails in Block 2. Motion carried unanimously. The City Engineer stated the required number of property owners signed the petition. Vierling/Leroux moved to take Resolution No. 2008 off the table. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 2008 carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling offered Resolution No. 2007, A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 1831, Permitting the Closing of Atwood Street Between 4th and 5th Avenues During Construction of St. Francis Hospital, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Lebens/Wampach moved to amend the City Code which provides that prior to issuance of a liquor or beer license, payment of taxes by owners as well as renters must be made, and taxes may not be delinquent or late. The City Clerk explained her preference for payment of taxes in regard to the issuance of a liquor license. Considerable discussion took place regarding the renter's responsibility for payment of the taxes. Cncl. Leroux stated this was putting restrictions on one industry which are totally unequal in any other business. Motion failed with Cncl. Lebens and Wampach in favor, and Cncl. Colligan, Leroux, Vierling and Reinke opposed. Leroux/Colligan moved to send Ordinance No. 94 back to staff to provide for No. 3, Exhibit B of the City Clerk's memo dated May 18, 1982, with the elimination of the words "as well as renters", and to somehow include language tying responsibility to the renter who has a legal interest in the ownership of the property for the payment of taxes. Motion carried unanimously. Lebens/Vierling moved to approve the applications and grant on On Sale and Off Sale 3.2 Beer License to Jackson E. Chilquist, 220 West 2nd Ave. , upon surrender of the existing licenses for the same location, if surrendered within seven days. Motion carried unanimously. Shakopee City Council June 1, 1982 Page 5 Council considered applications for 1982/1983 On and Off Sale 3.2 Beer Licenses, Set Up Licenses, On Sale Club Intoxicating Liquor Licenses, and Off Sale Intoxi- cating Liquor Licenses. Colligan/Leroux moved to approve the application and grant a Set Up License to Jim & Lucy's, Inc. , 201 West First Ave. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling moved to approve the application and grant a Set Up License to Knights of Columbus Home Assoc. , Inc. , East Fourth Avenue. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Wampach moved to approve the application and grant a Set Up License to Jackson E. Chilquist, 220 West 2nd Ave. Motion Carried unanimously. Leroux/Colligan moved to approve the application and grant an On Sale Club Intoxica- ting Liquor License to the American Legion Post No. 2, 1266 East First Ave. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Leroux moved to approve the application and grant an On Sale Club Intoxica- ting Liquor License to Veterans of Foreign Wars, Post No. 4046, 132 East First Ave. Motion carried unanimously. Wampach/Leroux moved to approve the application and grant an On Sale Club Intoxica- ting Liquor License to Knights of Columbus Home Association, Inc. , East Fourth Ave. and CR82. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Vierling moved to approve the application and grant an Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to XX Corporation, 1561 East First Ave. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Colligan moved to approve the application and grant an Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to Clair's Bar, Inc. , 124 South Holmes. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Vierling moved to table the application for an Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Family Dining, Inc. , RR 1, Highway 101. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling moved to approve the application and grant an Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to Riverside Liquors, Inc. , 507 East First Avenue. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Leroux moved to table the application for an Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Dennis P. Bruesehoff & Thomas J. Cox - a partnership, Minn. Valley Mall, on Hwy. 169 South. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Leroux moved to approve the application and grant an Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to Friendly Folks Club, Inc., 122 East First Ave. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Colligan moved to table the application for an Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Pullman Club, Inc. , 124 West First Ave. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Leroux moved to table the application for an On/Off Sale Non-intoxicating Malt Liquor License for Jim & Lucy's, Inc. , 201 West First Ave. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Vierling moved to approve the application and grant an On/Off Sale Non-Intoxi- cating Malt Liquor License to Jackson E. Chilquist, 220 West Second Ave. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling moved to approve the application and grant an Off Sale Non-Intoxi- cating Malt Liquor License to Friendly Folks Club, Inc. , 122 East First Ave. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Lebens moved to approve the application and grant an On Sale Non-intoxicating Malt Liquor License to Marlene Berg dba Shakopee Bowl, 222 East First Ave. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Vierling moved to table the application for an On Sale Non-intoxicating Malt Liquor License for Stagecoach Stores, Jct. 101 & CR89. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Vierling moved to table the application for Off Sale Non-intoxicating Malt Liquor License for Dorothy Stocker, 537 S. Sommerville and the application for On Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor for Raceway Park, Inc. , Highway 101. Motion carried unanimously. Shakopee City Council June 1, 1982 Page 6 Leroux/Vierling moved to approve the application and grant an Off Sale Non-intoxi- cating Malt Liquor License to Richard E. Cleveland dba Cleve 's Red Owl, 828 East First Ave. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Leroux moved to approve the application and grant an Off Sale Non-intoxi- cating Malt Liquor License to JoAnne A. Pauluk, 409 East First Ave. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Leroux moved to approve the application and grant an Off Sale Non-intoxi- cating Malt liquor License to Art Berens & Sons, Inc. , 123 West Second Ave. Motion carried unanimously. Wampach/Colligan moved to approve the application and grant an Off Sale Non-intoxi- cating Malt Liquor License to Juba's Super Valu, 1100 Minn. Valley Mall. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Lebens moved to table the applications for On Sale Non-intoxicating Malt Liquor License to Minnesota Valley Restoration Project, Inc. , Hwy. 101; for Off Sale Non-intoxicating Malt Liquor License to Holiday Station Stores, Inc. , 4Ij;4 East First Ave. ; and for On Sale Non-intoxicating Malt Liquor License to Valley Racquetball and Handball, 600 CR83. Motion carried unanimously. Lem ux/Vierling moved to approve the application and grant an Off Sale Non-intoxi- cating Malt Liquor License to Superamerica Stations, Inc. , 1155 East First Ave. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Leroux moved to approve the application and grant an On Sale Non-intoxi- cating Malt Liquor License to Valleyfair, Inc. , One Valleyfair Drive. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Leroux moved to approve the application and grant an On/Off Sale Non-intoxi- cating Malt Liquor License to Je She Inc. dba Mr. Jerry's Pizza, 823 East First Ave. Motion carried unanimously. Vierling/Leroux moved to approve the application and grant an On Sale Non-intoxi- cating Malt Liquor License to Pizza Huts of the Northwest, Inc., 257 Marschall Road. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Vierling moved to approve the application and grant an Off Sale Non-intoxi- cating Malt Liquor License to Brooks Superettes Inc. , Jct. CR16 & CR17. Motion carried with Cncl. Colligan opposed. Colligan/Leroux moved to place in nomination William Anderson, David Dunwell, Lauren Sorenson, Dawn Schwingler, Freeman Chi-Shing Tsui, Loren Wolf, Robert Ziegler and John Toppin to be considered for appointment to the Energy and Transportation Committee. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Wampach moved to accept Valley Industrial Propane bid proposal for one used 11,050 water__capacity gallon propane tank and specified dispensing equipment for $21,000.00, and direct staff to execute appropriate agreement. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Leroux/Colligan moved to adopt Alternate No. 2 Assessment Policy for Valley Indus- trial Blvd. So. as presented by the City Engineer in his memo dated May 28, 1982. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Lebens moved to direct back to staff the 1982 Seal and Chip Program in regard to 10th Avenue between CR17 and Harrison Street, to be brought back to Coun- cil for later discussion. Motion carried unanimously. Lebens/Colligan moved that bills in the amount of $274,952.68 be allowed and ordered paid. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Colligan/Leroux moved to authorize proper City officials to enter into an agreement for participation in Urban Corps Program between the City of Minneapolis and City of Shakopee for the period July 1, 1982 and June 30, 1983. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Colligan moved to direct staff to deposit the $4,700 cashier's check from Shakopee Countryside Recreation ($4,000 land, $700 appraisal) for payment on the land known as the Shakopee Old Wastewater Treatment Plant, and authorize the proper Shakopee City Council June 1, 1982 Page 7 City officials to return $4,000 to Shakopee Countryside Recreation; and thatthe City is free to accept any future offers to purchase the property. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Leroux/Colligan moved to adjourn to 7:00 P.M. June 8, 1982. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 11:25 P.M. Judith S. Cox City Clerk Diane S. Beuch Recording Secretary ._ CLETUS J.LINK CONSTRUCTION COMPA i \ tftl dbiFT'hMd''itt�i*4 S 4 i • Shakopee,Minnesota 55379 445-2277 or 445-6262 12831 Link Lrive nkREALITY • MATERIAL BUILDING • EXCAVATION JUN 91982 CITY C11 SHAKOPEE June 7, 1982 City of Shakopee 129 East 1st. Ave. Shakopee, MN 55379 Honorable Mayor Reinke: Members of the City Council: This letter is in regards to the entrance and exit for the Shakopee Housing apartments located on the corner of 4th Avenue and Co. Rd. 17. Since the time Co. Rd. 17 was constructed and due to the recommendations by your past engineer Mr. Coriesky, the tenants of Shakopee Housing have been crossing my property. This creates a liability for me. The special assessments on the parcel of land in question was approx- imately $8,000.00. I offered to sell the parcel to Mr. Farmer, the owner, for $4,000.00. He has offered $1,800.00 for a perpetual right away. This is not a satisfactory solution to the problem. Mr. Farmer was promised by Mr. Coller the city attorney in January of 1981 that he would address the situation as soon as possible. It is now one andialf years and numerous letters latter and nothing has been done to resolve the problem. As Mr. Farmer indicates in his last letter to us , which I 've enclosed a copy of, it is a responsibility of the City and therefore I also feel the City has to take action to resolve the problem. Sincerely, 1 i' ,2_-11 / �1 Cletus J. Li `` CJL/hcl .armer - guyher Management C0. 715 834-2691 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 715 SO. BARSTOW STREET EAU CLAIRE, WISCONSIN 54701 May 21 , 1982 Mr. Cletus J. Link Route #1 Box 1314 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Mr. Link: I have your latest letter of May 13 concerning the access to our south parking lot at our apartments in Shakopee. Without question this alledged trespass across your land so far as the entry to our driveway is concerned is very obviously a responsibility of the city. I feel quite confident with the legal process that they can be required to pay. However, in light of the rather long legal process that this is probably going to involve, I am willing to pay you the sum of $1800.00 for a perpetual right to use our driveway across your property. I am making this offer to you in light of the long litigation period which will probably be involved with the city. Very ,truly yours, • s �yfin . .rmer BJF:sc MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Special Assessment Interest Abatement DATE: June 9, 1982 Introduction Robert Friendshuh, 1108 West Third Avenue, has requested abatement of interest on his assessment for the Third Avenue Watermain Project because the work (driveway apron) has not been completed. Background This situation has very serious implications as a precedent. The City has been assessing some projects "up front", or before the project is totally finished, to avoid some of the problems caused by assessment appeals. The City incurs non-construction costs before the assessment hearings thereby losing interest income. The City pays interest on the bonds as soon as they are issued. Normally, the amount of reinvestment income (interest earnings on bond proceeds before spent) and the date the assessments start bearing interest are figured into the assessment roll. The interest appears either as interest on the assessments after levy or as capitalized or construction loan interest in the principal amount of the assessment. This issue of assessments and interest before the project is closed out has arisen before and is possible for any assessment levied before final payment on construction. A few of the other projects like this include Eastview, Halo 2nd and Weinandt. When a delay in a project occurs, the "City" usually benefits by having money available for investment from the project. However, the amount and therefore, the benefit, may be insignificant. To shift this "benefit" to the property owners means either moving the interest start date back or amending the assessment roll. The amount of work involved in accomplishing this depends on where the assessments are in the certification cycle and how many prepayments there have been and, of course, the number of parcels involved. The situation could also be where setting the interest start date back to the construction completion date could "cost the City" which nay then have to be made up by a tax levy. Trying to shift interest amounts and dates around in these situations may be trying to cut too fine a line. There is also a philosophical side to this issue. Usually, the developer has asked the City to do the project and is benefitting from City financing. The City does not guarantee a completion date and therefore is not liable for penalties for construction delays. As custodian of public funds the City should not set itself up for a "win or lose" situation, but should always be in a no lose posture. Com' John K. Anderson, City Administrator June 9, 1982 Page 2 Of course, individual cases arising under this subject have to be viewed with reasonableness. The specific case in point is Mr. Friendshuh. The project was completed in 1981. The City Engineer told him the apron would be paved. It is 1982 and the apron is not in yet. The simple approach is to take the estimated cost of the unfinished work ($150.00) and calculate the interest charged on the roll from adoption to June 30, 1982. This equals $22.19. The interest on his total assessment for the same period is $594.89. Council may want to view this case as an exception and grant a refund of interest in which case the money would come from the improvement fund. Alternatives 1. Do nothing 2. Refund interest on unfinished work in the amount of $22.19. 3. Refund interest on total assessment in the amount of $594.89. Recommendation Staff recommends alternative # 2. Action Move to consider Mr. Friendshuh's claim an isolated case and refund $22.19 for interest on unfinished driveway work for Third Avenue Watermain Project assessment levied against parcel #27-901-5333-012-0 with the money for the refund coming out of the improvement fund. GV/ljw JULIUS A.COLLER, II 612-445-1244 JULIUS A.COLLER ATTORNEY AT LAW 1E159-1940 2 1 1 WEST FIRST AVENUE SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA 553Z9 June 14, 1982 Shakopee City Council and Mr. John K. Anderson City Administrator Shakopee City Hall 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Gentlemen: At the last Council Meeting the Weinandt dispute/rewast erred to me for my consideration and recommendation. The Weinandt project is the first such improvement undertaken bytthe e thanCity where the assessments for the improvement was made "up front" at the completion of the improvement when all the figures are in,and hopefully we all will have gained some valuable knowledge for the future, if the City embarks on a similar project. In reviewing the City's position I have conferred with staff and also I have conferred with Mr. Weinandt. The entire project seems to have been fraught with error and confusion almost from its inception and as a result I feel that a compromise between the City and Mr. Weinandt is in order and this is due in part to the problem ofduringestablishing he mte when the area ea was bene- fitted by the improvement especially unable to get a building permit because the road was not black-topped. Clearly, according to the contract, the developer shouldnot have to se. toepWoayrk as the mobilization fee of $500 and the $800 inflationary meet The in should have been done the previous year when all of the equip place and there had been no inflationary increases. The developer did not receive the benefit of any of the improvement during 1981 and this would lead me to recommend that the supplemental Assessment less $1300 be levied with interest charges to run from January 1, 1983. My final recommendation would be that the City take a real hard look beforen e getting into another advanced assessment project, especially prices are so unstable. If I can be of any further assistance please contact me. Ile truly yours, Jul 'mss A. Coller, II JAC/nh City Attorne g Julius A.GULLER, TT 612-445-I244 ATTORNEY AT LAWS JULIUS A.COLLER Igg9-1940 211 WEST FIRST AVENUE SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA r S3Z9 DATE: JUNE 11, 1982 MEMO TO SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL AND JOHN K. ANDERSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JULIUS A. COLLER, II, CITY ATTORNEY RE: PROPOSED LEASE BETWEEN CITY AND SHAKOPEE JOB SERVICE OFFICE BACKGROUND: The City of Shakopee has agreed to allow the Shakopee Job Service Office to occupy a portion of the second floor of the Shakopee City Hall known as the Council Chambers together with use in common with others of the lavatory and hallways of the second floor of said building as a stairwell affording ingress and egress to East First Avenue to the second floor without making any charge therefor. The period is to be from April 1, 1982 for one year. The Council has instructed me as City Attorney to draw up a proper lease, which was done, and which was submitted to Conrad Derus for approval by the proper parties. I am now advised that the Job Service Office are averse to signing a lease but have submitted an agreement, which eliminates the standard provisions of the ordinary standard lease but does include special material and con- ditions in the proposed lease. They request that the City execute such an agreement. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. The agreement is not in form to be signed by the City. It should be re-drawn as to form. 2. It has always been official to adopt and have a uniform form of leases, conveyances and this type of instrument and it is my recommendation that the City do not accept the proposed agreement but require the Job Service Office to sign the lease. In the event they will not, I propose that they either vacate the premises or be allowed to occupy the same at will of the City and without a written agreement. 4ije m u,mitted, Apok Op J ius' . oller, II JAC/bpm Shakopee City Attorney AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF SHAKOPEE AND MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY This agreement covers the provision of office space by the City of Shakopee, for the use of the Minnesota Department of Economic Security to operate a Job Service office. The City of Shakopee agrees to: 1. Provide a portion of second floor space, in the City Hall Building, known as the Council Chambers. The City Hall is located on part of Lot 4, Block 4, in the City of Shakopee. This provision of space includes use in common with others of the lavatory and hallways on the second floor, as well as the stairwell affording access from First Avenue to the second floor. 2. Provide utility services including heating, cooling, electrical, and water at no cost to the Minnesota Department of Economic Security. The Minnesota Department of Economic Security agrees to: 1. Provide the staff and equipment needed to operate a Job Service office. 2. Provide telephone service for the operation of the Job Service office. 3. Maintain the space provided in a safe, and clean condition. 4. Maintain, in cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce, the common second floor hallway and lavatory. 5. Secure written approval from the City of Shakopee prior to undertaking any remodeling or redecorating of the office. Also to pay the costs of any such projects. 6. Secure written approval from the City of Shakopee prior to the erection of any signs. Also to pay the costs of both erection and removal of any signs. 7. Be responsible for the vault within the office, and if the combination is changed, to pay for that change. • a� /flirt .14�ssr.-f. ..._ �,._� ,_ - �._ ..�..r�.._.._. .... ._ ...��,a .,:,-.,mow.. . . f �_�...a.� .,�;..,,.. .t .., This agreement will be in effect for one year beginning June 1st, 1982. This agreement is subject to a six-month review, and may be cancelled by either party upon 60 days notice. Date Eldon Reinke, Mayor City of Shakopee Date Michael Wold, Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Economic Security 49.1L Nominations to be considered for appointment to the Energy and Transportation Committee made by Council June 1, 1982 William Anderson David Dunwell Lauren Sorenson Dawn Schwingler Freeman Chi-Shing Tsui Loren Wolf Robert Ziegler John Toppin ?SL) 1982/1983 OFF SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSES There are no delinquent taxes for any of the applicants for renewal of licenses and the 1st one-half of the 1982 payable taxes have been paid by all applicants. Action Requested 1] Remove applications from the table 2] Approve the application and grant an off sale intoxicating liquor license to : OK Family Dining, Inc. RR 1 , Hwy 101 Leave Dennis P. Bruesehoff & Thomas J . Cox - A Partnership Tabled Minnesota Valley Mall on Hwy 169 South OK Pullman Club, Inc . 124 West First Avenue 6/15/82 JUNE 15, 1982 1982/1983 3 .2 BEER LICENSE RENEWALS There are no delinquent taxes for any of the applicants for renewal of licenses . As of June 1st at 11 : 00 a.m. the 1st one-half of 1982 taxes have been paid by all applicants whose applications are in order , except Valley Rac uetball* and Valleyfair Inc . Payment by Valleyfair has been delayed because of the suit regarding their assessed value which has been resolved now and they will be making payment as soon as the paper work is completed at the County. Action Requested 1 ] Applications now in order should be removed from the (:table 2] Approve application and grant an on/off sale non-intoxicating malt liquor license to : June 1st une 15 Action On Off OK Table Jim & Lucy' s Inc. X X 201 West First Avenue OK Jackson E. Chilquist X X 220 West Second Avenue OK Friendly Folks Club, Inc . X 122 East First Avenue OK Marlene Berg dba Shakopee Bowl X 222 East First Avenue ,eave Tabled Stagecoach Stores X Jct . 101 & CR 89 OK Table Dorothy Stocker X 537 So. Sommerville OK Table Raceway Park, Inc . X Highway 101 OK Richard E. Cleveland dba X Cleve ' s Red Owl. 828 East First Avenue OK JoAnne A. Pauluk X 409 East First Avenue OK Art Berens & Sons , Inc . X 123 West Second Avenue OK Juba ' s Super Valu X 1100 Minnesota Valley Mall OK Table Minnesota Valley Restoration __ X Project Inc . Highway 101 A' A4 p OK Superamerica Stations Inc . X 1155 East First Avenue OK Valleyfair, Inc . X One Valleyfair Drive OK Je She Inc . dba Mr. Jerry' s Pizza X X 823 East First Avenue OK Table Holiday Station Stores , Inc . X 444 East First Avenue OK Pizza Huts of the Northwest , Inc . X 257 Marschall Road OK* Table Valley Racquetball and Handball X 600 County Road 83 OK Brooks Superettes Inc . X Jct . CR 16 & CR 17 /774(5._ eo .--S.a4 u fiC)`"%;- y r 3, ;, tic � JL,s 7 C- / 14& C.``Y 1 {.i /2:7 Alt\ '/ /4-le . PIC )i&cirz T� S /rte /9 / /-4 vJ Pa v e95.47-7 TA Kcci fri . S i 4 / 77 o f v v UJ s4 t tr 14 6 YCt.S3 S 1 ,-z. 2. J1 4 / 0 0 1/4 ` 640- 4344/G 7q/S e / W 7 T/4 A / rz/' /.S (i (5C.. Q-A/ ' / 4/c.5 /T /.ter� o ,S / C�' � �-/S ,)A-i f v�. ✓� T� 7-4)(' S Ar T4/� %/,��r�� T//L 3 G > L..`-c.F-rte- C. ( c Lc /3 A/Li ,r714 /004.7—AA/ `- AK is C7 O Li n.- g V S S /../ 5d Ti-A5VL-(e F--U ✓�i�� .r .4 A. 7//AT OLM- &14 .& %... you l�a-/�-� A.A1 6'Yc Lc ( u.--' 70 74 C / y. C3 6 c c Lt,:: e S 1°x0i /4)(15 77-) 4g5- 4-) 0 ,y fi r601,,Z: fav MEMO TO: John K. Anderson City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre Acting City Planner RE: Amendment to City Code - Moving of Structures DATE : June 10, 1982 Introduction : The Planning Commission at their meeting of June 3 , 1982 has recommended the amendment of the Shakopee City Code, Section 11. 05 , Subd. 9, "Moving of Structures" to allow for special provisions for the moving of accessory structures . Background : The attached May 21, 1982 memo to the Planning Commission from Don Steger, City Planner, provides background on how this issue was initiated and the proposed language. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed change and there was no public comment . Requested Action : Direct staff to prepare the appropriate ordinance incorporating the provisions, as recommended by the Planning Commission at their meeting of June 3, 1982 . JA/j iw Attachments moo Cf L� MEMO TO: Shakopee Planning Commission FROM: Don Steger, City Planner RE: Amendment to Shakopee City Code Section 11. 05, Subd. 9, Entitled "Moving of Structures" DATE : May 21, 1982 At the July 23, 1981 meeting the Planning Commission approved a policy and guidelines for moving accessory structures (garages , sheds , etc . ) . The Planning Commission' s intent was to create a simple procedure to be followed, rather than requiring a Conditional Use Permit and the entire public hearing process, as is needed for moving a house. These guidelines, copy of which is attached, have been used several times and have worked very well. However, the Assistant City Attorney has recommended that these guidelines be put in the form of a Zoning Ordinance amend- ment so that their legality could not be questioned. Also attached is a copy of Pg. 297 and 298 which contain those portions of the Zoning Ordinance which deal with the moving of structures . The Ordinance could be amended by adding the following language Pg. 298, after F-2 . : G . Accessory buildings shall be exempt from the preceding regulations. An administrative staff review of the moving of all accessory structures shall be conducted and the following criteria must be met : 1. The structure must be clearly accessory in nature. 2 . The accessory structure must be compatible with adjoining structures in the proposed location. 3 . The accessory structure must be equal or exceeding in value of the adjoining accessory structures in the proposed location. 4 . The owner must show proof of ownership of the proposed location. 5 . The accessory structure must meet all requirements of the Building Code within three months after it is moved. A bond shall be required equal in amount to the cost necessary to abate deficiencies. 6 . All setback and zoning requirements must be met . 7. The accessory structure must be a permitted accessory use in the District in which it is intended to be located. M, May 21, 1982 Shakopee Planning Ornmission • Moving of Structures Page -2- If any applicant shall feel aggrieved by a staff determination relative to an accessory abuilding, thatonal Permit . applicant shall have the right to apply for In addition to this •amending language which was reviewed by the Assistant City Attorney , he suggested adding the following under- scored language to the first paragraph of Subd. 9, on Pg. 297 : Subd. 9 . Moving of Structures . A Conditional Use Permit shall be required before a Building Permit is issued to move any dwelling unit or other structure , except for accessory buildings as hereinafter provided, to a permanent location within the City . The minimum requirements of a Conditional Use Permit must be met for all dwelling units moved to a permanent location in the City shall include the following. Action Requested : Move to recommend to the City Council the amending of Section 11. 05 , Subd . 9 , "Moving of Structures" , to allow for special provisions for the moving of accessory structures, as has been the recommendation of the Assistant City Attorney . DS/jiw Attachments 41111 1111 ^11: 'F 1() ): tilt:,!, , G/ FkOM : Dun SLeger . City PI ;an:,c: , RE : to\ ; u,; , I Ac .ess„ry t o_ • _. r' s 1)A'1'E : July 15 , 1951 • At the .lull '1 , 19ti1 m •et it,F, . PIat►niti;' Commission dis- cussed the po :sihi l itv of t .'sly reviewing th. mf vino of ;tccc• ,surN buildings , r;t her lh:, 1:hi:ai 1 t ini; such review to they Planning ('ommissicon . ` t was r, by the Planning Com- mi :,siOn that the staff chart grid., ; i ,;, s t .,r such an administra- tive rev i ow . 'I h,'so guide] i nc:. 1 , I I w : (:tiidcel i nos For The Adminit.t rnt i � i1 I ► Nevis w Of The Moving 01 Accessory Structures . ._ 1 . The structure must by c. learl . , ssory in nature . 2 . Me accessory structure must h. u,p;tt iblc with adjoining structures in the prcpnsed I , c:, t i ,,n . 3 . The accessOFV structure must he ( (pal ur exceeding in value of the adjoining accessory structures in the proposed• cation . 4 . The owner mast show proof of ownnrshi p of the proposed lo- cation . 5 . The aceessoty me, t all requirements of the Ruilclin,; Code within . ` 'months alter it is moved. A bond Shall he required equal in ;amount to the cost necessary to abate deficiencies . 6 . All setback and zoning requirements must be met . 7 . The idcessory structure must he :t permitted accessory use in the Uistriei in which it is intended to be located. If these guidelines are adopted by the Planning Commission ac- cessory structures which can not meet all the above guidelines as well as principle structures will still require Planning Co;dmission review and a Conditional Use Permit . The guidelines are solely intended to simplify the procedure for the moving o1 structures which are accessory and routine in nature. US/,jam 11 84 . @'fir 1 ' 411 1. Within a period of three (3) months after 111 the termination of a mining operation , or within three (3) months after abandonment of such operation for a period of six (6) months , or within three (3) months after expiration of a mining permit, all buildings, structures and plants incidental to such operation shall be dismantled and removed by, and at the expense of , the mining operator last operating such buildings, structures and plants. A conditional use permit may be granted for those buildings, structures, machinery and plants required to process previously mined materials stored on the site. Such permit may apply for only one (1) year , after which said buildings, struc- tures , machinery and plants shall be removed . 2 . The peaks and depressions of the area shall be graded and backfilled to a surface which will result in gently rolling topography in substantial conformity to the land area immediately surrounding , and which will minimize erosion due to rainfall. No finished slope shall exceed eighteen percent (18%) in grade. 3 . Reclaimed areas shall be sodded or sur- faced with soil of a quality at least equal to the topsoil of land areas immediately surrounding , and to a depth of at least three ( 3) inches . Such required topsoil shall be planted with legumes and (passes . Trees and shrub:, may also be planted, but not as a substitute for legumes and grasses. Such planting shall adequately retard soil erosion . Excavations completed to a water producing depth need not be backfilled if the water depth is at least ten (10) feet and if banks shall be sloped to the water ' line at a slope no greater than three ( 3) feet horizontal to one (1) foot vertical. The finished grade shall be such that it will not adversely affect the surrounding land or future development of the site upon which mining operations have been conducted. The finished plan shall restore the mining site to a condition whereby it can be utilized for the type of land use proposed to occupy the site after mining operations cease. Subd . 8 . Mobile Homes. Mobile homes shall be regula- ted by Section 4 . 60 of the City Code, except that mobile homes shall be a conditional use in the "A-I " and "R-1" Districts for agricultural purposes if they meet the following standards: A. Property must be being used as an agricultural use. B . Mobile home may not be the only occupied resi- dential structure on the property. C . The persons living in the mobile home must be related to the farm operator and must work on that farm. D. The mobile home be placed on the property for no more than five (5) years. E. The conditional use must be reviewed on an an- nual basis. Subd . 9 . Moving of Structures . A conditional use per- mit shall be requi.rd before a building permit is issued to move any dwelling unit or other structure to a permanent location within the City . The minimum requirements o a conditional use ff2SQr1" airdecifroz 7/ r-297- 11dvoirJ/Ivm4-1//0/7 o/- A16 s,,' th t e q &#o//2ty) 'lei 4#0 q , . permit which must be met for all dwelling units moved to a perma- 1 nent location in the City shall include the following: A . The dwelling units must equal or exceed in value the adjacent homes . B. The owner must show proof of ownership of the proposed location . C. The dwelling unit must be compatible with adja- cent houses . Source : Ordinance No. 31 , 4th Series Effective Date : 10-25-79 D. The dwelling unit must meet all requirements of the Building Code within six (6) months after it is moved . A bond shall be required equal in amount to the cost necessary to abate any deficiencies that might exist as determined by the Planning Commission or City Administrator . Source : Ordinance No. 72 , 4th Series Effective Date : 9-10-81 E . Must be a permitted or conditional use in the Zoning District. Source : Ordinance No. 31 , 4th Series 4 . Effective Date : 10-25-79 F. Structures other than dwelling units must meet the following minimum standards : 1 . Meet all requirements of the Building Code within six (6) months after it is moved . A bond shall be required equal in amount to the cost necessary to abate deficiencies that might exist as determined by the Planning Commission or City Admin- istrator . 2. Be compatible with adjacent homes and structures . Source : Ordinance No. 72 , 4th Series Effective Date : 9-10-81 Gi l [ ' if. __ Subd . 1 . Home Occupations . ny home occupation may be permitted only as a conditional use if it complies with the minimum requirements of this Subdivision . A. The home occupation shall be carried on by a member of the family in the dwelling unit with not more than one employee who is not part of the family. B. The home occupation shall be carried on wholly within the principal or accessory structure . C . Exterior displays or signs , except those per- .- mitted by the Shakopee Sign Ordinance , exterior storage of mate- (12-1-81) -298- MEMO TO : John K. Anderson City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre Acting City Planner RE : Final Plat of Hauer' s 2nd Addition DATE : June 10 , 1982 Introduction : At is June 3 , 1982 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Plat of Hauer' s 2nd Addition subject to seven conditions outlined on the attached Resolution No. 2004 . One item recommended by staff to be included in the Developer' s Agreement was deleted by Planning Commission following their deliberations . Background : The case study prepared for the Planning Commission to consider final plat approval for Hauer' s 2nd Addition is attached as back- ground. All staff recommendations were accepted by the Planning Commission except for Item 4f, as indicated on the case report dated May 6 , 1982 which provides for walkway from 11th Avenue to Park Ridge Drive . The Planning Commission, as you know, is in favor of a road right-of-way as the most appropriate means of public access between Hauer' s 1st Addition and 11th Avenue. Comm. Coller asked to go on record stating, "it is poor planning practice not to connect 11th Avenue and Park Ridge Drive" . The staff recommendation to provide a pedestrian walkway along the area previously proposed as street right-of-way is in response to the Shakopee School Board' s request to provide public pedestrian access where informal access has previously occurred. This request was made so that the schools can avoid the additional bussing required if the only public access to Park Ridge Drive is via County Road 16 . The Planning Commission felt adding this condition to Mr. Hauer' s plat is unreasonable in that the northern- most lot , Lot 1, could potentially have a walkway within a few feet from the future house, which is not the same as a sidewalk in the public right-of-way 30 feet in front of a house . The Assistant City Attorney has since presented the opinion that a walkway easement on Lot 1, would constitute a taking of the land and could not be a condition of the plat unless taken as park dedication, or purchased. The City Attorney has ruled that no further park dedication can be taken from Mr. Hauer for this plat , so even that option is precluded in this case. John K. Anderson June 10 , 1982 ,� Hauer' s 2nd Addition Page -2- � The City Engineer did present the Planning Commission another walkway option at their June 3rd meeting, which involves securing a walkway easement from Mr. & Mrs. Cecil Clay . The Clay ' s own property adjacent to Hauer' s 2nd Addition (see attached map) . The Planning Commission has not recommended this option to the City Council. However, City staff has pursued the availability of the easement with the Clays, so that the City Council can consider this option. The Clay ' s are currently torrencing their property and will not consider granting a walkway easement at this time . They are more in favor of the construction of a roadway and would grant an easement for a road. The Clay ' s did consider an improved walkway with restricted access as preferable to the informal walkway that exists now and might consider a walkway easement in the future if the road is not built . Alternatives Regarding the Walkway : 1. Drop consideration of the acquisition and development of a walkway between Park Ridge Drive to 11th Avenue at this time. 2. Pursue the purchase ofof a his FinalaPlateasement Hauer'1sMr. 2ndHauer Addition. prior tooapproval 3 . Approve Mr. Hauer' s final plat now but continue to pursue the acquisition of a walkway easement with the Clays and/or Mr. Hauer. 4 . Reconsider the connection of 11th Avenue and Park Ridge Drive prior to the Final Plat appproval of Hauer' s 2nd Addition. Recommended Action : 1. Determine action to be taken regarding walkway or road and determine if this action precludes approval of the Final Plat of Hauer' s 2nd Addition, at this time. 2 . publicdirection betweennbeen llthprovided nue andregarding Ridgeissue Drive , either : publ a) Hold over approval of the Final Plat of Hauer' s 2nd Addition; or b ) Adopt Resolution No . 2004 , A Resolution Approving The Final Plat of Hauer' s 2nd Addition. JA/j iw Attachments • t� - It, l0 1 O a V P" 't i (D a- l- :J. - Q J U' 7 / =N O _J -r- ci) 1:-.0 • tP� cry - 9 ',v tr L Q {- AC,1.11 s y lip '1 ♦ • S r--1 c-i ``n • as ,, , 40 0 IT tje C i * A. (1.,/ CD 1 4 sI Q) O (V I -4- k.�i . �,Y g,[74.71 .1 t.,..., , . 0, 0 PP C.;® 4", t iiiii‘il'` .' - Azt cno Aul U c 4) 1 l,! CJ V� J / Ze MI 3c4 �vW $4 0 1.4 • � �' ��/ o �+ N O < 0.) CJ CA J 'd 1 � .Ai. ° /� as Oto LsaJ1..) 0aJas ( 1J m 4/ ' • 1) `a i �'' ee en i H •J' r cd 1 N QJ '�, b �. 3 4-e r-'4C.)CJ ni a, o 3 D,•,1i P u•d 0; 0 E o.-4 3 J cl -0ora 1-+r-+ a o 1� ji o. U y0 N12, 4-4 - 1-+4J 4ccdd44 0W 14 LI 7... cn ›Ii^-4 0 0 0 en 0 \ \4- .0* 4-„, U ti4-) 4-� ... CJ O cd QS 0 - CU.t;f.'24 •- m O - u 1I 0 0 0 In g4..) .‘ % 1\\try. \ C4 W15 g W r-1 a r--1.0 r-4 u+r..-1I-4 O . V- et x0 i1f \ \ o4 Wen 1•c •%54 .0.0'\\\ 3 a0 4J 0 0 � CO)4-1 0 W'0 p 1..et. . o ,d 14 v ,a ro•.a O cd 0 v 0 civ 4-1 4J 4J r-4 4J • C. N -I-4 .0 rO r-a RI 0 CO O'C1 co rOi 'I a)r-1 r-a 0 0 a) •rl o-4-1 411 4-4 a r-1 'd 11 W a) 0, C) d 4-) Exhibit A MEMO TO : John K . Anderson ,b City Administrator FROM : Jeanne Andre Acting City Planner RE: Updateon Final Plat of Hauer's 2nd Addition DATE : June 11, 1982 Introduction : Since the memo on the Final Plat of Hauer's 2nd Addition was written, two additional items have come to light, which have caused staff to revise the recommendations presented to and approved by the Planning Commission. The revised recommendations are incorporated in Resolution No. 2004, A Resolution Approving The Final Plat of Hauer's 2nd Addition. Background : The changed recommendations relative to those listed in the Planning Commission minutes of June 3, 1982 areas follows: 1. Recommendation No. 6 was changed to provide for a recordable easement which will prevent land disturbing activities on certain lots without prior approval of the City Engineer. The substance is the same, the only added feature is assuring the condition with a recordable agreement. 2. Recommendation No. 7 has been dropped. This recommendation increased all sideyard easements to 10 feet and was questioned by the applicant's surveyor. Review of the file uncovered no staff request for the condition other than its listing in the final case study. As no utilities are planned in these easements, no basis for increasing the easement could be found in the City Code. The City Engineer, Manager of the Public Utilities, City Clerk, City Administrator, and Chairman of the Planning Commission all were questioned and none could suggest a rationale for this requirement, therefore, it is recommended to be dropped, and is not included in the resolution prepared for City Council. Recommended Action : Adopt Resolution No. 2004, A Resolution Approving The Final Plat of Hauer's 2nd Addition, as presented. JA/jiw OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Session Shakopee, Minnesota June 3 , 1982 Chrmn. Schmitt called the meeting to order at 7 : 50 P.M. , with Comm. Coller, Czaja, Stolt'zman and Perusich present. Absent : Comm. Rockne and Koehnen. Also present : City Admin. , John Anderson; Acting City Planner, Jeanne Andre and City Engineer, H. R. Spurrier. Czaja/Perusich moved to approve the meeting minutes of May 6 , 1982 . Motion carried unanimously . Whipps Conditional Use Permit PC 82-6C : Coller/Perusich moved to continue the public hearing on a request for a Conditional Use Permit to occupy a mobile home as temporary living quarters while assisting in the family farming operation in an AG Zone . Motion carried unanimously . Acting P_1 ruuicir ,.taLed 1 DLit the code find been :mended ,arid was In effect May 27, 1982 which allows a Conditional Use Permit to be reissued for a 5-year term(s) at the discretion of the Planning Commission. Chrmn. Schmitt asked for comments from the audience. There were none. Perusich/Stoltzman moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously . Perusich/Stoltzman offered Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 296 , allowing a mobile home as temporary living quarters while assisting in the family farming operation, ned moved for Its adoption, subject 1,0 the following conditions : 1. The mobile home may not be the only occupied residential structure on the property ; 2 . Only the applicant and family may reside in the mobile home and must work on the farm; 3 . The mobile home must continue to utilize tie-downs; 4 . The Permit must be reviewed annually; 5 . The Permit shall expire in June 1987 . Motion carried unanimously . Final Plat of Hauer' s 2nd Addition PC 82-14P : AC-- Acting Planner stated that the City Council had unanimously voted at their meeting of May 1.8, 1982 , to not connect 11th Avenue and Park Ridge Drive. This action was taken as a result of surveys which had been conducted in the area which showed that the, residents on Park Ridge Drive di.d not want the streets connected . Proceedings of the June 3, 1982 Shakopee Planning Commission Page -2- �. Acting Planner then reported on findings of several other issues which were of concern to the Planning Commission at their meeting of May 6 , 1982. She stated that the Director of Community Services had requested a trail easemtnt be provided within the "utility and drainage easement" along the south portion of Lots 4 and 5 . However, the City Attorney has indicated that a trail easement cannot be required but could only be included on the plat if the Developer, Mr. Hauer, would agree to it . Chrmn. Schmitt stated that no progress for a trail has been evident :ince the conception of this idea years ago so it should not be a great problem to anyone. Acting Planner stated that the Park Dedication issue has been resolved in that a letter from Julius A. Coller, II, City Attorney, dated May 10, 1982 indicates that no parkland dedication or cash payment in lieu can be requested of Mr. Hauer because of an excess parkland dedication from Hauer' s 1st Addition. Lengthy discussion took place on the suggested walkway between 11th Avenue and Park Ridge Drive. Chrmn. Schmitt stated he had spoken with the schools and they would like the walkway for their students. The City Admin. stated that the residents in the area were not opposed to the walkway but just to the roadway connecting 11th Avenue and Park Ridge Drive. He added these residents are use to having pedestrian traffic but not the vehicular. Chrmn. Schmitt stated he has a problem with a sidewalk and no street access. He also added that under the new State Code on bussing whereby a student must live two miles or more from school in order to be bussed, if Park Ridge Drive and 11th Avenue were to be connected there would be no requirement for school bussing, currently students must be bussed. Gene Hauer, Developer, stated there was a 20 foot watermain easement on an adjacent parcel that could possibly be used for a walkway as well . Discussion was held on this suggestion. Chrmn. Schmitt suggested that the watermain easement be further investigated to include the possibility of the walkway. He stated this would then move the walkway a minimum of 10 feet from the house to be construction on Lot 1, Block 1, Hauer ' s 2nd Addition. Comm. Coller questioned the emergency vehicular traffic problem for this area in view of the cul-de-sac . Acting Planner stated the Fire Chief had signed off as approving the Final Plat of Hauer 's 2nd Addition, therefore, he must not have any concern with the cul-de-sac and emergency vehicles. Proceedings of the June 3 , 1982 y'fr Shakopee Planning Commission Page -3- Perusich/Stoltzman moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the Final Plat of Hauer' s 2nd Addition, subject to the following conditions : 1. Approval of a Title Opinion by the City Attorney ; 2 . The railroad tre,5tle be removed prior to recording the plat ; 3. Execution of a Developer' s Agreement for the construction of the required improvements : a) Street lighting be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utility Commission; b ) The water system be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utility Commission. In addition, if the two existing water service "stubs" to the plat do not match the planned lots, they must be removed; c ) Sanitary and storm water systems be installed in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer; d) Street improvements be made in accordance with the requirements of City Engineer. Curb and gutter must be installed throughout Austin Court , in addition to Austin Street ; e) Street signing, if needed, be installed in accordance with City regulations; 4 . An easement be included on the hardshells to accommodate a drainage swale across Lots 1, 2 and 3. This easement shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to recording the subdivision. 5 . The signature block must be changed to conform to the City Code . 6 . No land disturbing activities shall occur within the southern- most utility and drainage easement on Lots 4 and 5 , unless approved by the City Engineer. 7 . The 5 foot drainage and utility easements along the side property lines must be increased to 10 feet . Motion carried unanimously . Comm. Coller stated that for the record he feels that not connecting lith Avenue with Park Ridge Drive in conjunction with the plat of Hauer' s 2nd Addition, presents poor planning. Owens-Illinois Conditional Use Permit PC 82-17C : Stoltzman/Coller moved to open the public hearing on the request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a structure which exceeds the height limitation of 45 feet in an I-2 Zone . Motion carried unanimously. Acting Planner stated Staff is recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit request but with a provision that the structure not exceed 47 feet in height , thereby allowing for 2 feet in excess of the 45 foot height limitation for the 1-2 Zone. • 9 DATE: May 6, 1982 CASE: PC 82-14P ITEM: Final Plat of Hauer's 2nd Addition APPLICANT: Gene Hauer, LOCATION: Austin Street (South of 11th Avenue) ZONING/LAND USE: R-2 Urban Residential/Vacant APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 11.26; Chapter 12 - Subdivision Regulations CASE HEARD BY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL Proposal: The applicant is requesting final plat approval of Hauer's 2nd Addition, a 5-lot residential subdivision. Considerations: 1. The Preliminary Plat of this proposed subdivision, originally titled "Hauer's 3rd Addition" was approved in October 1981 with several conditions. See staff report on preliminary plat, which is attached. 2. The Director of Community Services, George Muenchow, has requested that the utility and drainage easement provided along the South of Lots 4 and 5 be renamed "utility, drainage and trail easement". Longer range plans call for an east/west trail in proximity to the drainage way. 3. The City Engineer indicated that plans for public improvements must be approved. Construction plans for sanitary sewer and roadway construction have been reviewed and these plans are substantially complete. 4. The City Engineer indicated that a drainage :;wale, required across Lots 1, 2 and 3 is not situated in an easement. This easement, as approved by the City Engineer, must be added to the Final Plat. 5. As with all plats, all physical improvements must be made a part of the Developer's Agreement. 6. A question arose during the City Council's review of the Preliminary Plat, as to the required amount of cash or land for park dedication. Because land dedication by the applicant took place during a previous subdivision, while still in Eagle Creek Township, the City Attorney needs to investigate and determine the previous dedication's applicability to this proposed plat. 7. A paved walkway, linking 11th Avenue and Park Ridge Drive, is needed to provide convenient access to the Jr. High School and other schools further west. This walkway could be placed along the north property line of Lot 1. Final Plat of Hauer's 2nd Addition May 6, 1982 PC 82-14P Page Two 8. Because of the steep slopes on the southern-most portion of Lots 4 & 5, erosion control measures must be taken to stop the erosion. Therefore, no land disturbing activities must occur within the southern-most easements, unless approved by the City Engineer. 9. The signature block on the final plat must be changed to conform to the City Code. 10. The 5-foot drainage and utility easements along the side property lines must be increased to 10 feet in order to comply with the Code requirements. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat of Hauer's 2nd Addition with the following conditions: 1. Approval of a Title Opinion by the City Attorney. 2. Park dedication be in cash, payable at the time of Building Permit issuance. The City Attorney shall determine the amount of cash which is applicable to this subdivision. 3. The railroad trestle be removed prior to recording the plat. 4. Execution of a Developer's Agreement for the construction of the required improvements: a. Street lighting be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission; b. The water system be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. In addition, if the two existing water service "stubs" to the plat do not match the planned lots, they must be removed; c. Sanitary and storm water sewer systems be installed in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer; d. Street improvements be made in accordance with the requirements of City Engineer. Curb and gutter must be installed throughout Austin Court, in addition to Austin Street; e. Street signing, if needed, be installed in accordance with City regulations; f. A paved walkway, linking 11th Avenue and Park Ridge Drive, be provided along the north property line of Lot 1. 5. The easement along the southern portion of Lots 4 and 5 be retitled "utility, drainage and trail easement", Final Plat of Hauer's 2nd Addition May 6, 1982 PC 82-14P Page Three 741„ � 6. An easement be included on the hardshells to accommodate a drainage swale across Lots 1, 2 and 3. This easement shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to recording the subdivision. 7. The signature block must be changed to conform to the City Code. 8. No land disturbing activities shall occur within the southern-most utility and drainage easement on Lots 4 and 5, unless approved by the City Engineer. 9. The 5-foot drainage and utility easements along the side property lines must be increased to 10 feet. DS/jiw Attachments Planning Commission Action: May 6 , 1982 Planning Commission action was to table final plat approval until June 3rd meeting and take the case to City Council for discussion on the connecting of 11th Avenue and Park Ridge Drive . Planning Commission Action of June 3, 1982 : Approved the Final Plat of Hauer ' s 2nd Addition and recommended it to City Council, subject to conditions , L5 follows : 1. Approval of Title Opinion by the City Attorney; 2 . The railroad trestle be removed prior to recording the plat ; 3 . Execution of Developer 's Agreement for the construction of the following requirement improvements : a. Street lighting be installed in accordance with the requirements of SPUC; b . Water system be installed in accordance with the requirements of PUC. In addition, if the two existing water service "stubs" to the plat do not match the planned lots , they must be removed. c . Sanitary and storm water sewer systems be installed in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer; d . Street improvements be made in accordance with the requirements of City Eng. Curb & gutter must be installed throughtout Austin Ct . , in addition to Austin St . e . Street signing, if needed, be installed in accordance with City regulations; Final Plat - Hauer's 2nd Addition Page -4- 4 . An easement be included on the hardshells to accommodate a drainage swale across Lots 1, 2 & 3 . This easement shall be approved by the City Eng. prior to recording the subdivision. 5 . Signature block must be changed to conform to City Code. 6 . No land disturbing activities shall occur within the southern- most utility and drainage easement on Lots 4 & 5, unless approved by the City Eng. 7. The 5' drainage & uti. ity easements along the side property lines must be increased to 10 feet . City Council Action: • • DATE: October 8, 1981 CASE: PC 81-32P ITEM: Preliminary Plat of Hauer's 3rd Addition APPLICANT: Gene Hauer. . . LOCATION: Austin Street (south of 11th Avenue) ZONING/LAND USE: R-2, Urban Residential/Vacant APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 11.26; Chapter 12 (Subd. Regs.) PUBLIC HEARING HELD: CASE HEARD BY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL Proposal: The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval of Hauer's 3rd Addition, a five-lot subdivision . Land Use Compatibility: Surrounding land uses: Single family and twin homes exist to the north, east and west of the proposed subdivision. Agricultural land, zoned for home development, exists to the south. Urban Services Availability: Sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water services are either available directly adjacent to each proposed lot or in close proximity, so as to be readily extended. Flood Plain: The property lies out of any flood plain. Considerations: 1 . The proposed plat consists of five lots, each sufficiently large to meet R-2 zoning requirements for size and building setbacks. Abandoned railroad property has been purchased by the applicant and combined with each lot to provide the larger lot sizes. 2. The plat proposes to use existing Austin Street for access to the lots. In addition, a modified cul-de-sac, Austin Court , is proposed. This "bubble" would align directly across from Davis Court located immediately to the west. 3. Although the topography varies throughout the plat, building restrictions should be minimal or non-existent. 4. Because of the anticipated land uses, no incompatibility with surrounding developments .is anticipated. Hauer's 3rd Addition PC 81-32P October 8, 1981 Page -2- • t/ � 5. A bicycle path is proposed to link Park Ridge Drive and 11th Avenue. A small triangular parcel of property abutting the northwest corner of Lot 1 and lying within the 11th Avenue right-of-way should be dedicated, as part of this plat, as 11th Avenue. This property could then be used as a portion of the bicycle path in the future. 6. The City Engineer noted, for information purposes, that this proposed subdivision develops runoff that eventually is discharged to other property owned by the developer along County Road 16 . The developer should be aware that there is no formal outlet for this drainage other than to pond on the developer's land lying north and south of County Road 16. 7. Curb and gutter should be installed throughout Austin Court in addition to Austin Street. 8. In the opinion of the City Engineer, Austin Street would not be extended because it is not practical to build Austin Street at a reasonable grade. The Planning Commission agreed to this concept at the April 9, 1981 meeting. 9. Ten foot drainage and utility easements are provided along the north side of Lot 1 , the fronts of all five lots, and along the west side of Lot 5. However, the proposed sanitary sewer that runs along the Austin Street boulevard adjacent to the west side of Lot 5, aligns diagonally through the 10 foot easement. Therefore, the City Engineer is requesting a 10 foot easement on each side of the Proposed pipe. By increasing this easement, the buildable area is somewhat reduced, however, a slightly smaller house could still be accommodated. Additional sewer easements are indicated across the southern portion of Lots 4 and 5. This easement is in conjunction with the VIP sewer. 10. Because the plat entitled "Hauer's 2nd Addition" was never completed and recorded, Hauer's 3rd Addition should be renamed to the 2nd Addition. 11 . The north property line of Lot 3 intersects Austin Court at a sharp angle, creating a point of land. Maintenance of this irregularly-shaped lot corner may cause neighborhood problems in the future. A redesign of Lots 2 and 3 may reduce the angle. 12 . The former railroad trestle remains on Lot 4 . This trestle should be removed prior to recording the final plat. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary plat , subject to the following conditions: 1 . The small triangular parcel of property abutting the northwest corner of Lot 1 should be dedicated as 11th Avenue. 2 . Execution of a Developer's Agreement: a. Curb and gutter must be installed throughout Austin Court, in addition to Austin Street . Hauer 's 3rd Addition PC 81-32P October 8, 1981 Page -3- p P 3. The easement along the west property line of Lot 5, be increased to 10 feet on the east side of the proposed sanitar 10 feet on the west side of the pipe where y sewer pipe and up to possible. 4. The subdivision be retitled "Hauer's 2nd Addition". S. Lots 2 and 3 be redesigned in order to reduce the angle between the common lot line and Austin Court. 6. The railroad trestle be removed prior to recording the plat. 7. Approval of a Title Opinion by the City Attorney. 8. A cash payment be made to the City in lieu of park dedication. Planning Commmission Action: Approved with 8 conditions as listed above, plus as an addition to No. 2 L. If the two existing water service "stub:;" to the plat do not match the planned lots, they must be removed. City Council Action: Approved Preliminary Plat on October 20, 1981 with same conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission but also directed the City Attorney to come back with his interpretation of what had already been complied with for park dedication. • DS/jiw Attachments: 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2004 A Resolution Approving The Final Plat Of Hauer ' s 2nd Addition WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee did approve the Final Plat of Hauer ' s 2nd Addition on June 3 , 1982 and has recommended its adoption; and WHEREAS, all notices of hearing have been duly sent and posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council has been fully advised in all things . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the Final Plat of Hauer ' s 2nd Addition, described as follows : That part of the East half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 8 , Township 115, Range 22, which lies South- westerly of the Southwesterly right-of-way line of the Chicago, Milwaukee , St . Paul and Pacific Railroad (now abandoned) and North of the Easterly extension of the South line of Block 2, JEJ 2nd Addition. Also that part of the abandoned Chicago, Milwaukee, St . Paul and Pacific Railroad right-of-way in the East half of the Northwest quarter of Section 8 , Township 115 , Range 22 which lies South of the easterly extension of the North line of Block 2, JEJ 2nd Addition and North of the Easterly extension of the South line of Block 2 , JEJ 2nd Addition be, and the same hereby is approved and adopted with the requirements that : 1. Approval of a Title Opinion by the City Attorney; 2 . The railroad trestle be removed prior to recording the plat , 3 . Execution of a Developer ' s Agreement for the construction of the required improvements ; a) Street lighting be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utility Commission; b ) The water system be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utility Commission. In addition, if the two existing water service "stubs" to the plat do not match the planned lots, they must be removed; c ) Sanitary and storm water sewer systems be installed in accordance with the requirement of the City Engineer; d) Street improvements be made in accordance with the requirements of City Engineer. Curb and gutter must be installed throughout Austin Court , in addition to Austin Street ; e) Street signing, if needed, be installed in accord- ance with City regulations. Resolution No. 2004 t1 4 . An easement be included on the hardshells to accommodate a drainage swale across Lots 1, 2 and 3 . This easement shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to recording the subdivision. 5 . The signature block must be changed to conform to the City Code. 6 . Execution of a recordable agreement stating no land disturbing activities shall occur within the southern-most utility and drainage easement on Lots 4 and 5 , unless approved by the City Engineer. 7 . The 5 foot drainage and utility easements along the side property lines must be increased to 10 feet . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no parkland dedication or cash payment in lieu is being required for Hauer ' s 2nd Addition because of an excess parkland dedication on Hauer' s 1st Addition. BE IT ALSO RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk be and the same are hereby authorized and directed to execute said approved plat and Developer' s Agreement . Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee , Minnesota held this day of 1982. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1982. City Attorney ?C— MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre , Acting City Planner RE: Vacation of Fuller and Atwood Streets DATE: June 11 , 1982 Introduction St . Francis Hospital has requested the vacation of Atwood Street between Fourth and Fifth Avenues and the City Council has requested consideration of vacation of a like segment of Fuller Street. The issue was referred to the Planning Commission for additional input . At its June 3 , 1982 , meeting, the Planning Commission recommended the vacation of both Atwood and Fuller Streets with five additional related recommendations presented by staff. The issue is now back to the City Council for action. Background The attached memo of May 26 , 1982 , regarding the vacation of Atwood and Fuller Streets was prepared for the Planning Commission and is included here as additional background for the City Council . An exerpt from the Planning Commission minutes regarding this issue is also enclosed to give the City Council the benefit of the discussion held by the Commissioners . Resolutions 2016 and 2017 call for the setting of the public hearings required prior to the vacation of streets . If City Council desires to further consider the vacation of either street , the appropriate resolution( s ) should be adopted and effected parties should be requested to attend the public hearing. The City Council may also specify additional background which should be researched and presented by staff at the public hearing. Staff anticipates that the vacation, if recommended by the Council , would not be put into effect the night of the public hearing. Instead the hearing would serve to bring into the open those issues to be resolved if the vacation is to take place. Staff would then work on resolving any problems , negotiating necessary easements and agreements , and ordering necessary improvements to be constructed prior to the vacation. The hearing is therefore anticipated to deal conceptually with the vacation although the vacation may not occur immediately. Requested Action Adopt Resolution No. 2016 , A Resolution Initiating the Vacation of Fuller Street Between Fourth and Fifth Avenues , According to the Plat of Original Shakopee , Scott County, Minnesota, and Resolution No. 2017 , A Resolution Initiating the Vacation of Atwood Street Between Fourth and Fifth Avenues , According to the Plat of Original Shakopee , Scott County, Minnesota. JA/jms :14) 4!) MEMO TO: Shakopee Planning Commission FROM: Jeanne Andre, Acting City Planner RE: Vacation of Atwood and Fuller Streets DATE : May 26 , 1982 Introduction : St . Francis Hospital has requested the vacation of Atwood Street between Fourth and Fifth Avenues. In evaluating this request the City Council has indicated interest in simultaneously reviewing the possible vacation of Fuller Street, also between Fourth and Fifth. In addition to the public hearing required to consider street vacations, the City Council has requested review of the vacation of Atwood and/or Fuller by the Planning Commission to provide an additional perspective. Background: St . Francis has made the vacation request in order to accommodate more parking (an estimated 50 additional spaces) and to provide for possible long-range expansion of the hospital to the east . The hospital staff considers maintaining expansion capability essential to remain a competitive health-care facility in the metropolitan area. The hospital ' s request is contained in the attached letter of April 19, 1982 from Sister Agnes Otting. Also attached are plans of the parking lot as it would be designed with and without the vacation of Atwood. These plans do not include the vacation of Fuller, which1as not been requested . One reason the City is willing to consider or perhaps even promote selected street vacations , is that the City Engineer has determined that 42 percent of the urban area of Shakopee is street right-of-way. This high percentage of land dedicated for streets takes land out of the tax base and increases street maintenance obligations of the City . An additional positive factor in vacating streets adjacent to the hospital and courthouse is the alleviation of automobile pedestrian conflicts . Each of these facilities generates a high volume of visits each day . If the pedestrian trip from the parking lot to the facility can avoid direct passage through a roadway, accidents will be decreased. Shakopee Plannin4' ommission May 26, 1982 , Vacation - Fuller & Atwood Page -2- / C-- The City staff have met to consider the impact of the proposed street vacations on public improvements and the delivery of public services . The following discussion of concerns and implications of the vacation are organized by category . Drainage A. Culverts currently carry storm water flowing north along Atwood through the intersections of Fifth and Atwood and Fourth and Atwood. The hopsital ' s engineer has proposed an acceptable method of handling this runoff. The con- struction of these improvements, approved by the City Engineer, should be required in the event a parking lot is constructed. The approved solution is to keep the current culverts intact and allow the water to flow in the same historic path of the roadway , after it has been converted to a parking lot . B. The City Engineer has determined that if Fuller Street is to be vacated, drainage problems could be effectively handled by extending the current 36 inch storm sewer stub from Fifth and Holmes to Fifth and Fuller. This solution has not been discussed with other interested parties . Traffic Circulation Vacation of a segment of either Atwood or Fuller would have traffic circulation implications, some of which are pertinent to both streets , whileothers are significant if only one or the other is closed. A. The City Engineer is favorably disposed to vacating either or both segments. As part of an overall pavement management plan, he wants to encourage use of arterial and collector streets . These streets can be designed to withstand a heavier traffic volume. Feeder streets can then be designed for lower traffic volume, which will be less costly to construct and maintain over time. The Comprehensive Plan has identified County Road 17 and Holmes Street as arterials and Market as a collector north/south between First and Tenth Avenues . First and Tenth Avenues are arterials and Sixth and Fourth are collectors east/west . Traffic in the vicinity of the hospital and courthouse can reasonably be routed via Sixth and Fourth Avenues and Holmes Street to conform with this pavement management plan. B. The Fire Department has gone on record against the vacation of Atwood Street for the following reasons : 1. Atwood is used as a main thoroughfare to bring the men north to the station when there is a fire call. Currently , ten men approach the station via Scott 410 Shakopee Plannin .., ommission May 26 , 1982 Vacation - Fuller & Atwood Page -3- ei and ten men approach via Atwood. The Fire Chief considers assigning 20 men to come via Scott as a situation leading to dangerous congestion. 2 . Atwood is the main thoroughfare to go to emergencies south of the station. It is difficult for large fire trucks to maneuver the left turn at the inter- section of Scott Street and 2nd Avenue, so trucks go right on 2nd Avenue to Atwood. In addition, there are four drainage crosspans on Scott at three intersections , as compared to only one cross- pan on Atwood (between 2nd and 10th Avenues ) . The crosspans create the well-known dips , which require the fire trucks to slow significantly. The Fire Department has not taken an official stance on the vacation of Fuller, which is not as crucial for their day- to-day operations as Atwood. However, the Fire Chief is opposed to closing segments of both Fuller and Atwood, which he feels would compound the problem of north/south traffic in town. Possible means of solving or ameliorating the Fire Department concerns have been discussed as follows : 1. Some men could be assigned to approach the station on Fuller and/or Holmes Streets. Temporary closing of Atwood for hospital construction has caused the Fire Department to find a temporary resolution to this problem, which appears to be working. 2. Street parking could be eliminated for the first 30 feet on west side of Scott Street south of the inter- section of 2nd and Scott to allow a large enough radius for fire trucks to turn. The parking to be eliminated would be in front of the office of Jerome Jaspers , CPA, and may be contested by that firm. To deal with the problem of dips caused by crosspans , a Scott reconstruction plan could be studied and placed on the Capital Improvement Plan. C. The County Engineer has stated that a portion of Fuller between 6th and 4th Avenues is a County State Aid road -- designated County Road 16. The County would be willing to switch this designation to another road if desired by the City . Alternatives which have been suggested include Apgar, Scott , Holmes and Spencer. Any change in the north/south link of the designated County Road 16 would also require related changes on 6th and 4th Avenues . D. Fuller Street is also part of the current MTC bus route in Shakopee, from 1st to 6th Avenues. The vacation of a segment between 4th and 5th would, therefore, require rerouting the bus . A major reason for the bus to follow Fuller is to May 26 -1982 �., �� Shakopee PlanningaommiOion Page Vacation - Fullers . Atwood make use of the park-and-ride municipal parking lot . Many downtown businessmen have requested a redesigna- tion of the park-and-ride lot to a municipal lot between 1st Avenue and Levee Drive . This redesignation could accompany rerouting of the bus along Scott or some other north/south route . The rerouting issue has not been raised with the Metropolitan Transit Commission. Fire Service to Hospital and County Courthouse The Fire Department has expressed a concern for their ability to attend to fires at the hospital or courthouse if one side of the building is inaccessible due to the construction of the parking lot . St . Francis has suggested the use of surmountable curbs for its parking lot adjacent to the Atwood right-of-way. The Fire Department can then drive its equipment over the curb to an area designated for circulation in the parking lot . This solution is acceptable to the Fire Department , and could probably be utilized if Fuller is closed and the parking lot is extended eastward. Other Background Representatives of St . Francis Hospital and the Scott County Board of Commissioners will attend the June 3 , 1982 meeting of the Planning Commission to discuss their request and address potential problems identified with the vacation. St . Francis has also taken the initiative in explaining their request for vacation to neighbors of the hospital along Atwood from 2nd to 6th Avenues and fronting 4th and 5th Avenues near Atwood. Alternatives : 1. Recommend Streetshe City betweenC4thcil andthat 5th Avenuessbefand/or vacated or Fullerller F remain open. or ies 2. Requestof vacatingadditionl bFulleruannd/oroAtwoodnbetweend4th and5th effeectss Avenues . Recommended Action: Recommend to the City Council that Fuller and Atwood Streets between 4th and 5th Avenues be considered for vacation in accordance with a schedule and plan for the use of the vacated right-of-way presented by St . Francis Hospital and the Scott County Board of Commissioners and approved by the City Council , with the following related recommendations : Shakopee Plannin , ommission May 26, 1982 9/ C-- Vacation - Fuller Atwood Page -5- 1. No parking area be designated for the first 30 feet of the west side of Scott Street south of the intersection of Scott and 2nd Avenue. 2. A study be undertaken regarding the possible reconstruction of Scott Street . 3. County State Aid Road 16 be redesignated from Fuller to Scott Street . 4 . The Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) be requested to reroute the bus service from Fuller Street to Scott Street . 5. The City Engineer approve plans for handling historic drainage along Atwood and Fuller Streets before the vacation takes place. JA/j iw Attachments R EC EIV' D 'Yfit* APR 161982 -11„--447 CITY OF 3HA tOPEE St. Francis Hospital • 325 WEST FIFTH AVENUE•SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA 55379•(612)445-2322 April 14, 1982 Eldon Reinke, Mayor City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: Request to Vacate Atwood Street Dear Mayor Reinke, St. Francis Hospital has made substantial progress improving the parking situation for our patients, visitors and employees in the past year.* We presently have 270 off street parking spaces available in the land surrounding St. Francis Hospital . * Block 43 65 spaces * Block 45 66 spaces * Block 57 100 spaces Block 58 15 spaces Block-59 24 spaces We have developed an arrangement with St. Mark's for the multiple use of the parking lots on Blocks 43 and 45. The Hospital , the Church and the School have enjoyed this relationship of sharing parking facilities whereby parties benefit mutually. It is our goal to finalize a similar arrangement with Scott County and provide permanent off street parking on Block 57 prior to August, 1983. We continue to work with the County and the City to resolve the storm water problem currently associated with Block 57. As the sole owner of the land abutting Atwood Street between 4th and 5th Avenues, I would like to take this opportunity to submit a petition to vacate this street. I would ask that the City Council consider this request as part of our overall parking plan for Block 57, whereby the lot would be able to serve 350 vehicles at one time. This action would serve the public interest in that 58 additional off street parking spaces would be made available and the City would reduce its exposure as well as maintenance and reconstruction costs. SPONSORED BY THE FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF ST. PAUL, MN lcMayor Eldon Reinke -� April 14, 1982 Page Two Our request is consistent with Shakopee' s Comprehensive Transportation Plan in that vacating Atwood would have little impact on the streets designated as, collectors, arterials or bus routes. Your positive response indicates to us your strong support of St. Francis Hospital as a vital part of the Shakopee Community. Thank you. Sincerely, Sister Agnes Oting Executive Director SAO:hme Enclosure cc: Father John Cassidy Mr. Joe Ries Mr. John Anderson - _ ----- - fait, 41#14 '',._..,. .N,.A. •..,.._,.,. „..,•....„...,.,... „,,—,,..... —.4. .,. ---. -...-/t%1.. • - TWOOSTREET (r ..., . . . vi7-4,1-11--- -- . ri- . ,.• III L41111 .1[111 111 1111 .1" ' 0 --n 1 4.__________ ,......sit ----0,,,,, if if • eg_ at L--_ .. II—1" JX--,—J1—..___rt T i , c • _ ______ 1 •• , . — _ -3-- ,, I 1 • , : r , _ ' 0 -I - 1 • ; -•.....1,- .3.—-- — — •rt.••=•• . l i.. t —.. ... . . - g . 1:, — _____.______ • .1 j — - .1 i • 1- '----- 1 , ' . • i ›......... 1 , . - - - . ....... ___ --- Iii . • Ix .. fil .. -4 fr."1 1111 I il • . I • §.\\ ' ' fil i . 1. ' i •I 4 .-......, 1 • •:i... . swan,,. . 111 • ' ;1 .6.7. . \. • FULLER S-1– --tilliti: 4 • • 3.4 'ill ....*\ r ( i i i I Nit i ..... ..... ? ii • .. . 1 . ...... litlit ,. -, LI II c. wog x w 1 '4' II Pi I fa..., w• )4 , r• •a " . ! ....--.15,.....-...... i II a cl 0 H 5 ri i i ..., 1 9 IA is f i- '11 ir, Al li 1). ci 1 ,1 ,:• .1 1.:;, 1 ',1; ilr g, ° if 11:14 Il P'. Iii 6 i MII:r Ill 1 1 . . 1 --- , 3 :iiia I * _ 1;i.i.i. 1,5- 1. Q y+ b -0 1 7 Y 1d{ i 3 j ) ii iiiSS 7� {111 S = O] Q :d � aar, [1 N �" ;1 3 • a NO 1! 9 Y ) �,. . ) 1Z.Z.>>aE a. •• ds �Tnn� ?=. 3i c a t lg. psi .! : . - . I I r - - _ • , i. ,_, , N . _ al . r;' i a s__r' _ u� D_ 1 t . • W • J .♦ [____ . R < 1I 4. ... • • a ..4,. 1 a ;: f,. • • 0 y — --. LL. !..„:.:4. wimp," IN r a - - -r /' `_ C -?' ter. + 1�- .X_..l�.' _i'.1 •�. '41 . r�}41... . '.t}YYC' �.i u -.lv �Y t ...Y� �`': } • ' .) •4a 4..-i. ' } '. ..,.,:.,' k . . . . 1_ . Proceedings of the June 3, 1982 /C- Shakopee Planning Commission Page -6- Chrmn. Schmitt asked for questions from the audience . There were none. Stoltzman/Coller moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously . Perusich/Stoltzman moved to recommend to the City Council the amending of Shakopee City Code, Section 11. 05 , Subd . 9 , "Moving Structures" , to allow for special provisions for the moving of accessory structures , as follows : Subd. 9 , should read , "Moving of Structures . A Conditional Use Permit shall be required before a Building Permit is issued to move any dwelling unit or other structure, except for accessory buildings as hereinafter provided , to a permanent location within the City . The minimum requirements of a Conditional Use Permit must be met for all dwelling units moved to a permanent location in the City shall include the following : " Addition of Item G, to read : "Accessory buildings shall be exempt from the preceding regulations . An administrative staff review of the moving of all accessory structures shall be conducted and the following criteria must be met : 1. The structure must be clearly accessory in nature. 2 . The accessory structure must be compatible with adjoining structures in the proposed location. 3 . The accessory structure must be equal or exceeding in value of the adjoining accessory structures in the proposed location. 4 . The owner must show proof of ownership of the proposed location. 5 . The accessory structure must meet all requirements of the Building Code within three months after it is moved. A bond shall be required equal in amount to the cost necessary to abate deficiencies . 6 . All setback and zoning requirements must be met . 7 . The accessory structure must be a permitted accessory use in the District in which it is intended to be located. if any applicant shall feel aggrieved by a staff determination relative to an accessory building, that applicant shall have the right to apply for a Conditional Use Permit . Motion carried unanimously . Vacation of Fuller and Atwood Between 4th & 5th Avenues : Acting Planner stated the reason behind the request from St . Francis Hospital for the vacation of Atwood is to provide more adequate parking and further expansion needs . She stated the City is requesing the vacation of Fuller between 4th & 5th Avenues in conjunction with this request . A recommendation from the Planning Commission was requested by the City Council prior to its own consideration of this issue . Proceedings of the June 3, 1982 Shakopee Planning Commission Page -7- Joe Ries, County Administrator, stated that at the May 25, 1982 session of the County Commissioner Board, it was favored to close Fuller Street between 4th & 5th Avenues because this closing would fit in with their future plans for the County Courthouse facilities. He added that it should be noted Dick Mertz, Scott County Commissioner, was the only opposing. vote to this closing. Ery Prenevost , County Highway Engineer, was present to clarify their position in relation to the redesignating of another street as a county road should this closing go into effect . He stated the County cannot afford to lose any funds in county road designation, therefore, should Fuller be vacated , as is proposed, the City and the County would have to come to some agreement and work together to find another similar length of road to be so designated as a county road for financial reasons . Tom Prusak, representative from St . Francis Hospital, was present to formally request the closing of Atwood Street between 4th & 5th Avenues . He stated one small reason for this request was the lack of parking facilities . He stated that progress has been made in acquiring, through different methods , various areas for parking facilities but there is still a shortage due to the expansion of the hospital now in progress . He stated thatthe hospital has conducted a survey of nearby residents , whereby 22 out of 26 people polled were in favor of the closing of Atwood between 4th and 5th Avenues. He stated there are a few issues of concern in connection with the request to vacate; one being the drainage issue which has been resolved . He added the other issue of concern in the Fire Department ' s opposition to the closing because they want a direct route to get their men to the Fire Station. Acting Planner asked the total number of parking spaces the hospital will have if the vacation is granted. She was informed there will be 320 hospital off-street parking spaces . Chrmn. Schmitt stated he thought a two-hour parking limitation should be enforced for on-street parking in the hospital area as well as the Courthouse area. lie also suggested that the North portion of Block 57 could be employee parking as well as Block 45, but that the South portion of Block 57 should be parking for short-term use for both the Courthouse and hospital , this due to the location of the main entrances . Mr. Prusak agreed that the hospital is in favor of enforcement of the two-hour parking on streets adjacent to the hospital . Chrmn. Schmitt questioned the City Admin. as to the position of the City on two-hour parking limitations. City Admin . stated this could be handled. Mr. Prusak stated that without the vacation of Atwood , there would be 50 less parking stalls , but also with th i.; vacation the hospital could be able to expand in the easterly direction which is the only direction available for future expansion. Proceedings of the June 3, 1982 Shakopee Planning Commission Page -8- Comm. Coller stated that without the vacation of Atwood, the parking plan would have to be redesigned . He stated that the vacation of Atwood is not a crisis situation today to the operation of the hospital. Mr. Prusak agreed that it was not critical but still important to the hopsital in terms of further development . Chrmn. Schmitt passed the gavel to Vice Chrmn. Perusich. Discussion was held as to how these vacations could affect the Downtown Redevelopment Project with Chrmn. Schmitt stating his opinions as to how these vacations would permit the Central Business District to extend southward in the future. Joe Ries asked if the businesses of Downtown had commented on enlarging the Central Business District to the south. City Admin. replied that the Downtown Committee has been informed of these plans and this Committee comprises many downtown business people. Comm. Coller suggested that the City do a traffic study of traffic patterns should Fuller and Atwood be vacated and further suggested the temporary closing of Fuller and Atwood between 4th & 5th Avenues to see what traffic plans would be developed. Schmitt/Stoltzman moved to recommend to the City Council that Fuller and Atwood Streets between 4th & 5th Avenues be considered for vacation in accordance with a schedule and plan for the use of the vacated right-of-way presented by St . Francis Hospital and the Scott County Board of Commissioners and approved by the City Council, with the following related recommendations : 1. "No Parking" area be designated for the first 30 feet of the west side of Stott Street south of the intersection of Scott Street and 2nd Avenue. 2. A study be undertaken regarding the possible reconstruction of Scott Street . 3. County State Aid Road 16 be redesignated from Fuller to Scott . 4 . The Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) be requested to reroute the bus service from Fuller to Scott . 5 . The City Engineer approve plans for handling historic drainage along Atwood and Fuller Streets before the vacation takes place . Further discussion was held. City Admin. then stated that the question before the Planning Commission was why vacate the streets, he suggested that the Planning CommissI. n be asked wii have the streets? He stated the City is in need of o -;street parking and has enough Proceedings of the June 3 , 1982 Shakopee Planning Commission Page -9- street available for traffic . He also suggested by vacating these streets, it puts taxable land on the tax rolls . Comm. Czaja stated his agreement with the vacation of Atwood but was not ready to accept the closing of Fuller. He stated his concern was with the bus route which has proven to be very efficient. Discussion was then held on the location of the Park 'n Ride lots and the current bus routes . City Eng. stated that the buses should be kept on streets designed for buses because buses are extremely hard on streets . He also stated that the vacation of the streets seems to benefit so many factors . The Chair asked fop a vote on the motion. Discussion was then held on the value of vacating Fuller and Atwood between 4th & 5th Avenue in relation to the Central Business District being extended to the south. Schmitt/Stoltzman moved to limit debate . Motion carried. , The Chair asked for a vote on the main motion: Ayes : Schmitt , Stoltzman, Perusich Noes : Czaja Abstain: Coller (not being ready to close discussion on the issue ) Motion carried. Vice Chrmn. Perusich passed the gavel back to Chrmn. Schmitt . St . Francis Hospital Conditional Use Permit for Temporary Parking: Acting Planner stated that the Planning Commission in May of 1981 stated that a condition of approval of Conditional Use Permit Resolution No . 275 , providing for a parking lot in an R-2 Zone for St . Francis Hospital, was to be "renewed" in one year if a permanent parking lot was not constructed prior to that time. She stated that due to the redefining of "renewal" and "review" , she questioned if this condition could be clarified to its intent . She added that "renewal" meant the entire public hearing process over again for the applicant and was recommending a simple .;ta1f "review" . Coller/Stoltzman moved to "grandfather" in Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 275 under the new definition of review and require a staff review in one year - May 1983 . Motion carried unanimously . Comm. Coller asked staff to research the Conditional Use Permit granted to St . Francis Hospital for parking on Block 45 as to any condition of time. Ci RESOLUTION NO. 2016 A RESOLUTION INITIATING THE VACATION OF FULLER STREET BETWEEN FOURTH AND FIFTH AVENUES , ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF ORIGINAL SHAKOPEE, SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA WHEREAS , It has been made to appear to the Shakopee City Council that Fuller Street between Fourth and Fifth Avenues serves no public use or interest ; and WHEREAS , A public hearing must be had before such action can be taken and two weeks published and posted notice thereof must be given. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, That a hearing be held in the Council Chambers on the 20th day of July, 1982 , at 8 :45 p.m. , or thereafter, on the matter of vacating Fuller Street between Fourth and Fifth Avenues in the Original Shakopee Plat, according to the plat thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That two weeks ' published notice be given by publication in the Shakopee Valley News and posted notice be given by two weeks posting a copy of such notice on the bulletin board in the main floor of the Scott County Court House, on the bulletin board in the Shakopee City Hall and on the bulletin board at the Shakopee Public Utilities . Adopted in adjourned regular session of the Shakopee City Council held this 15th day of June, 1982 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Administrator Approved as to form this day of June , 1982 . City Attorney l RESOLUTION NO. 2017 A RESOLUTION INITIATING THE VACATION OF ATWOOD STREET BETWEEN FOURTH AND FIFTH AVENUES , ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF ORIGINAL SHAKOPEE, SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA WHEREAS , A PETITION has been received by abutting property owners , requesting the vacation of Atwood Street between Fourth and Fifth Avenues , Original Shakopee Plat ; and WHEREAS , It has been made to appear to the Shakopee City Council that the said street serves no public use or interest ; and WHEREAS , A public hearing must be had before such action can be taken and two weeks published and posted notice thereof must be given. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, That a hearing be held in the Council Chambers on the 20th day of July, 1982 at 8 : 30 p.m. , or thereafter, on the matter of vacating Atwood Street between Fourth and Fifth Avenues , Original Shakopee Plat , according to the plat thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That two weeks ' published notice be given by publication in the Shakopee Valley News and posted notice be given by two weeks posting a copy of such notice on the bulletin board in the main floor of the Scott County Court House, on the bulletin board in the Shakopee City Hall and on the bulletin board at the Shakopee Public Utilities . Adopted in adjourned regular session of the Shakopee City Council held this 15th day of June , 1982 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Administrator Approved as to form this day of , 1982 . City Attorney MEMO TO: John K. Anderson/City Administrator /DCL,* FROM: LeRoy Houser/Bldg. Official RE : Board of Appeals DATE: June 2 , 1982 Introduction: Per your request , I am furnishing you with additional information on the Board of Appeals . Background : Attached you will find the Uniform Building Code Section Requirement and the Minnesota Code of Agency Rules Amendment . You will note , the governing body is suppose to appoint a board . I have checked with the State and they say the Council can appoint themselves if they feel ti.cy are knowledgeable in the area . Both large and small cities in the metropolitan area were contacted to find out who they appoint to the Board of Appeals . It appears each area varied as to who was appointed to the Board. Some appoint Council , others use the Planning Commission, some appoint area builders and several did not have a Board of Appeals . There is no set number on the Board members , but an odd number would be needed to obtain a majority . I personally feel Council should set as the Board , this eliminates the problem of the foxes watching the chickens . Alternatives : 1 . Appoint a Board consisting of area contractors in the field. Recommendation: Have the Council appoint themselves , by resolution, the Board of Building Code Appeals . Action Requested : Approval of Resolution No . 2013, A Resolution Appointing and Setting Forth Rules of Procedure For The Building Code Board of Appeals . LH: cu Attachment Department of Administration 2 MCAR 1.10111 t/� • public nuisances and shall by abated by repair, rehabilitation, demolition or removal in accordance with the piocednics set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter •tb3 Sections 15 through 26. ------- UBC § 204 is amended by amending the Iasi sentence as follows: The Board shall adopt reasonable rules and regulations for conducting its investi- gations and shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the Building Official sc'ith a duplicate copy to the appellant and to the Slate Building In- spector within fifteen( IS)days of such decision. (IB(' § 205 is amended by adding a sentence as follows: Any violation of .. provisions of this code is a misdemeanor(Minn. Stat. § 16.865). IIB(' § 301(a) is amended by the addition of item 12 as follows: 12. Agricultural buildings as defined in Minn Slat. § 16.84,suhd. 6. § 304(a)of the (IB('is amended to read as follows: UBC § 304. (a) Permit Fees. The fee for each permit shall be as set forth in Table 3-A. Filch municipality shall adopt its own schedule of permit fees. The fee schedule of Table 3-A is hereby made optional for use by the local authority and is a recommended schedule In areas outside of the enforce- ment authority of a city. the fee charged tot the issuance of permits and in- 0 spect ions for single family dwellings may not exceed the greater of $100 or • .005 times the value of the stiucluie, addition in aliciation (Minn. Stat. § 16.851.) `'r The determination of value or valuation under any of the provisions of this code shall be made by the building official 1'he value to be used in comput- ing the building permit and building plan review fees shall he the total value of all construction work for which the permit is issued as well as all finish work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, ele- vators, file-extinguishing systems aunt any other permanent equipment. § 305(e)of the ltB('is amended to read as follows: ' UB(' § 305(e) Required Inspections. Reinforcing steel or structural frame- �r • work of any part of any building or structure shall not he covered or con- cealed r, cealed without first obtaining the approval of the building official. The building official, upon notification from the permit holder or his agent, shall make the following inspections and shall either approve that portion of the construction as completed or shall notify the permit holder or his agent wherein the same fails to comply with this code: 1. FOUNDATION INSPECTION: To he made after trenches are exca- vated and forms erected and when all materials for the foundation are deliv- Bred on the job. Where concrete from a central mixing plant (commonly • termed "transit mixed")is to he used, materials need not be on the job. II rte' �• -1L,,:troltivi eil ; ,:• ,.:i ii :°ij 203.2054litt ' t'� .it;' r: j t:�,ri.• UNIFORM BUILDING CODE a • ! r } i• Tri' • - • • �• governing body, may institute anyother appropriate ! t rHi1k ,,; „�, action to prevent, restrain, correct or abate the violation. j Board of Appeals ---�- /d Sec. 204. In order to determine the suitability of alternate materials and methods of construction and to provide for reasonable interpretations of this code, there shall be and is hereby created a Board of Appeals con- sisting of members who are qualified by experience and training to pass i t + NiA upon matters pertaining to building construction. The building official D ;; �, i ! Itl iz", shall be an ex officio member and shall act as secretary of the board. The r� `� ' ��w�.r :�` j Board of Appeals shall be appointed by the governing body and shall hold } '?,`, ;Milikl nti141,4010+ office at its pleasure.IThe hoard shall adopt reasonable rules and regula- ".'i' co. . • .»wrwii. 441.',... lions for conducting its investigations and shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the building official with a duplicate copy to the ap- pellant. • Violations Sec. 205. it shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect,construct,enlarge,alter,repair,move,improve,remove,convert or g;,r, demolish, equip, use, occupy or maintain any building or structure or ' M!kr';'!}!!_','+•.M cause or permit the same to be done in violation of this code. ? ` ' s rigN r • 1 ,{{ j4r-4} f !3► . jyilr jitr. ! • iiJ • 'l1/ :t• opt ., ' .. ra 41 ' , + i t t+rli, .• , i,.." ,; w, 4:tilt + f i :t• rUr 4�[,4�0- ,r rifir �: :4...04i:ori e • . .,,,,...,.,..4....„., . ,,.. w..:. , .‘ } ;,: ,,,, 26 • • "t*T!r"4'►I"T}in.ft. �.. a!.:.:•.:•::y...7777:77=7.711F17 - .7.. n _ ,7fF17 r1t �1•a t- ,. w 4.• i{fC< i}M(,Nfh# Ei'' '� I ►i £ Y 4044•;:, •M14! .(33.441-440,4 tr 4 ! t fn •y •b4,.,.atrt i 1 + i i ' t' 3{•' tusity • •;. ,. i ?yt 1.1 • • .r"•••, a3 f,7,4 . t.•'/.3,3,3,: ,. i ;f. • i I .;ii.iir .i . ts , fr/ �f41•• s !{w,. i1ft.............44.....5: ..t..,......Dt...Aw;w:..{ .LY1. ..v.4"4",‘ ' ss �: ' •+ ' •:Ai' ttt, it , ' . I t + iI i c jt • it itf ••1i . !" ft t +_1i •4; i { . ii „ a f:+si+ iiii iitii� 47!' 14sl}it � ltiy i ikh4flceth34h+'2 r� ;41t •r r�?+l ..1! .7.:4":' :i411.71::•1". •; tS}$fiijt� t(f., y !3Wk . '; • • .• 4:.i iieii; itl i� , S34 it �+' IIs , i !!i •9ppi ;1i{.{. . 31 .40,..”2,41,- 3Y:it N . l t, a • +r= i +3,, ! • j1 , �.r, i+Aap , ., D,{rk1#.4y.n �t, x. . `' .1,.' , ;` rd a' .l 044cialFu3e-,%6Vik...adu ti 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2013 / OC?' A RESOLUTION APPOINTING AND SETTING FORTH RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS WHEREAS, pursuant to U.B.C. Section 204 as amended by 2 MCAR 1.10111 a Building Code Board of Appeals has been created: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1) The Building Code Board of Appeals shall consist of the council members and mayor and the building official shall serve as an ex officio member and shall act as secretary of the Board. 2) The Building Code Board of Appeals is established to determine the suitability of alternate construction and materials and methods of construction and to provide for reasonable interpre- tations of the Building Codes. 3) The Building Code Board of Appeals shall have full authority to grant variances and waivers to the Building Code Requirements if said variances and waivers do not endanger life, health or property. 4) The Building Code Board of Appeals shall strive for reasonable solutions and prescribe alternate methods and materials which will provide equal protection, structural stability and health- ful environment which is the intent of the codes. 5) Any appellant may appeal to the Building Code Board of Appeals for a variance or waiver to the Building Code Requirements upon completion of the appropriate application and filing it with the City Building Official. Said application shall not go before the Building Code Board of Appeals until the Building Official has had the application on file for five working days prior to consideration by the Building Code Board of Appeals. 6) The fee for filing an appeal to the Building Code Board of Appeals is hereby set at $25.00, shall accompany the appeal application, and may be amended and adopted within the fee resolution annually. 7) The Building Code Board of Appeals shall adopt reasonable rules and regulations for conducting its investigations and shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the Building Official with a duplicate copy to the appellant and to the State Building Inspector within fifteen days of such decision. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1982. Mayor of the City of Shakopee AIILST: k)MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator f FROM: Judith S . Cox, City Clerk RE: Ordinance No. 96 , Construction on an Easement DATE: June 11 , 1982 Pursuant to Council direction on June 1 , 1982 , Mr. Coller has prepared the attached ordinance dealing with construction on an easement . Requested Action Offer Ordinance No. 96 , An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee , Minnesota, Amending City Code Chapter 4 Entitled "Construction Licensing, Permits and Regulations ," by Adopting Section 4.03 Entitled "Prohibition and Limitation" and Containing Penalties in the Event of Violation, and move its adoption. JSC/jms ORDINANCE NO. 96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 4 ENTITLED "CONSTRUCTION LICENSING, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS ," BY ADOPTING SECTION 4.03 ENTITLED "PROHIBITION AND LIMITATION" AND CONTAINING PENALTIES IN THE EVENT OF VIOLATION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS : SECTION I : Shakopee City Code , Chapter 4 entitled "CONSTRUCTION LICENSING, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS ," is hereby amended by adding the following: A. Prohibition and limitations 1 . No building permit may be issued for the construction, alteration, extension or enlargement of any permanent building, structure o$ fixture ,or moveable building over 120 square feet on, over , under or across any easement of the City. 2 . No improvement for ingress , egress , or parking lots shall be permitted within a public easement without a permit therefore pursuant to Section 7 .07 of the Shakopee City Code. SECTION II : Provisions of the City code adopted The Shakopee City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions applicable to the entire City Code including Penalty for Violations" and Section 4. 99 entitled "Violations a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION III : When in Force This Ordinance shall be published once in the official news- paper of the City of Shakopee and shall be in full force and effect on and after the date of said publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shakopee , Minnesota , in session held this day of , 1982 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1982 . /0C. MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S . Cox, City Clerk RE: Amendment to City Code on Liquor and Beer Licensing Regulations Pertaining to Payment of Taxes DATE: June 11 , 1982 Introduction Pursuant to Council direction of June 1 , 1982 , the City Attorney, Mr. Coller has prepared the attached amendment to the City Code . The amendment provides that no license shall be granted for opera- tion on any premises upon which taxes , assessments , or installments thereof, or other financial claims of the City, are delinquint or late and unpaid, if payment is the obligation of the licensee as fee owner or owner of a contract interest in the real estate occupied by the premises to be licensed . In order that the first one-half of taxes can be paid in a timely manner and be in compliance with the above , all beer and liquor license renewals will henceforth be brought to the Council after May 31st of a given year. Action Requested Offer Ordinance No. 94, An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee Amending Shakopee City Code Chapter 5 Entitled "Liquor, Beer and Wine Licensing and Regulation" by Repealing Part of Section 5 .02 Subd 8 and by Adding New Provisions to Section 5 .02 Subd 8 , 5 . 11 Subd 5 and 5 . 32 Subd 6 and by Adopting by Reference City Code Chapter 1 and Section 5 . 99 , Which Among Other Things Contain Penalty Provisions , and move its adoption. JSC/jms ORDINANCE NO. 94 / cj Fourth Series AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE AMENDING SHAKOPEE CITY CODE CHAPTER 5 ENTITLED "LIQUOR, BEER AND WINE LICENSING AND REGULATION" BY REPEALING PART OF SECTION 5 .02 SUBD 8 AND BY ADDING NEW PROVISIONS TO SECTION 5 .02 SUBD 8 , 5 . 11 SUBD 5 AND 5 . 32 SUBD 6 AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 5 . 99 , WHICH AMONG OTHER THINGS CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS : SECTION I : Shakopee City Code , Chapter 5 entitled "Liquor, Beer and Wine Licensing and Regulation" is hereby amended as follows : A. Section 5.02 Subd 8 is amended by striking therefrom the following words in the last line , to-wit : "owed by the applicant and are" and substituting in lieu thereof the words "delinquent or late and unpaid if payment is the obligation of the licensee as fee owner or owner of a contract interest in the real estate occupied by the premises to be licensed" so the last sentence of Subd 8 shall read "No license shall be granted for operation on any premises upon which taxes , assessments , or installments thereof , or other financial claims of the City , are delinquent or late and unpaid, if payment is the obligation of the licensee as fee owner or owner of a contract interest in the real estate occupied by the premises to be licensed" . B. Section 5 . 11 amended by adding a new Subd 5 . Subd 5 - Each such application shall also be accompanied by a receipt showing the payment of at least the first half of the current real estate taxes . C. Section 5 . 32 Subd 6 is amended by adding the following: "Each such application shall also be accompanied by a receipt showing the payment of at least the first one-half of the current real estate taxes . SECTION II : Penalty Provisions Adopted Shakopee City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and definitions applicable to the entire City Code including Penalty Provisions" and Section 5. 99 entitled "Violations a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION III : When in Force and Effect After the adoption, signing and attestation of this Ordinance it shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City of Shakopee and shall be in full force and effect on and after the date following such publication. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee , Minnesota, held this day of 1982 . j/Cts' MEMO TO : John K. Anderson City Administrator FROM : H. R. Spurrier Sp41 - City Engineer 41-77 RE : Valley Industrial Boulevard- outh - County Road 83 to the East line of Valley Park 2nd Addition Improvement No. 1982-2 DATE : June 14, 1982 Introduction : City Council is holding the hearing on the assessment for the improvement of Valley Industrial Boulevard South, June 15, 1982. Background: The public hearing for this improvement is being held prior to award of a contract for the improvement. Bids for the work were received May 17, 1982 and the apparent low bidder was Valley Paving, Inc. The low bid was approximately 18 percent below the Engineer's estimate. The resulting assessment was approximately 19 percent below the original estimate in the Feasibility Report. The original Feasibility Report was judged not feasible because there was insufficient activity in the real estate market to determine whether the value of the properties benefitted by the project would increase an amount equal to the assessment. The Feasibility Report alluded to a different method of proving benefit. That method would require that the road be posted at its true capacity of 5 Tons between County Road 83 and the East line of Valley Park 2nd Addition. Posting the road at 5 Tons may have a negative affect upon development of the Industrial Park and would be used as an option only in the event no other alternative could be found. It is the recommendation of City staff that City Council hold a hearing on the proposed assessment of Valley Industrial Boulevard South, County Road 83 to the East line of Valley Park 2nd Addition. At the hearing advise property owners of the alternatives left to the City and determine whether the property owners prefer to have the road constructed or prefer to have the road posted at its true capacity or prefer that the City do nothing and leave the road as it is, understanding that the City will perform no more maintenance than it does today. John Anderson June 14, 1982 Valley Industrial Blvd. So. Page -2- Also attached is a memoranda dated June 11, 1982 from Gregg Voxland, Finance Director, detailing the alternatives the City has regarding the interest rate to be charged the proposed project in the event a resolution adopting the assessments is adopted by City Council. That memoranda is self-explanatory and therefore, in adopting the assessments, Council should specify the source of the funds and the interest rate to be charged the project. Action Requested: 1 . Hold the assessment hearing 1982-2 Public Improvement Program, Valley Industrial Boulevard South, County Road 83 to the East line of Valley Park 2nd Addition. 2. Determine the appropriate financing method and establish the interest rate to be used for the project. 3. Adopt Resolution No . 2015, A Resolution Adopting Assessments 1982-2 Public Improvement Program, Valley Industrial Boulevard South, County Road 83 to the East line of Valley Park 2nd Addition, together with the attached assessment roll. 4. Adopted Resolution No. 2014, A Resolution Accepting Bid On Valley Industrial Boulevard South, County Road 83 to the East line of Valley Park 2nd Addition Improvement District 1982-2, awarding the contract to Valley Paving, Inc. , 12494 Wyoming Avenue South, Savage, MN 55378, in the amount of $141, 583.80 and direct the appropriate City staff to enter into a contract with Valley Paving Inc. HRS/jiw Attachments if CCS MEMO TO: H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Interest Rate on Valley Industrial Blvd. South Assessments DATE: June 11, 1982 Introduction You have requested a determination of what interest rate should be used for the assessment roll for Valley Industrial Boulevard South. Background The assessment policy calls for an interest rate on an assessment roll of 2% over the bond interest rate. However, bonds have not yet been sold for this project. The last bond issue sold for 9.83% which would be an assessment rate of 11.75%. Springsted has estimated bonds would currently sell for approximately 10.5% which would be an assessment rate of 12.5%. If bonds were not sold for the project and PIR monies were used, it would tie up almost all of the PIR cash and Council could choose a rate. Short term investments are currently earning 12 to 13.5%. Alternatives 1. Base assessment rate on last bond issue which would be 11.75% 2. Base assessment rate on estimated bond sale for this project which would be 12.5% 3. Determine an assessment rate for use of PIR monies Alternative number two is the recommended option for Council to follow because it should be the closest to the desired result as stated in the assess- ment policy and will probably not be as likely to leave the City with a too low assessment rate in relation to the bonds as was the case with the last bond issue. GV/ljw /18 RESOLUTION NO. 2015 A Resolution Adopting Assessments 1982-2 Public Improvement Program Valley Industrial Boulevard South County Road 33 To, The East Line Of Valley Park 2nd Addition WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as request by law, the City Council of the City of Shakopee met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment of: Valley Industrial Boulevard South, County Road 83 to the East line of Valley Park 2nd Addition by roadway construction NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA : 1. That such proposed assessment together with any amendments thereof, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein and each tract therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvements in the amount of the assessments levied against it. 2. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten ( lO) years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1983, and shall bear interest at the rate of percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment rosolution. To the first installment shall be added the interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1982' and to each subsequent installment when due shall be added the interest for one year on all unpaid installments . 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of this resolution; he may thereafter pay to the County Treasurer the installment and interest in process of collection on the current tax list, and he may pay the remaining principal balance of the assessment to the City Treasurer. Resolution No. 2015 4. The Clerk shall file the assessment rolls pertaining to this assessment in his office and shall certify annually to the County Auditor 'n or before October 10th of each year the total amount of installments and interest which are to become due in the following year on the assessment on each parcel of land included in the assessment roll . Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1982. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST : City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1982. City Attorney •, (/) - • 7) -.*: NJ. C') v) n —4 * — > 73 > > cu > 2 IN -,_ ....., 0 0.) (0 7 '4LC) ---„, =" 0) Lc, a) v.) • v) = o --...• ..iii c') C •••< Cr. .0 co CD v a) ''< C) C 7 . :r (DX (0 r c' -7 c) -1 r c' V o ' n tri ry (1) a) . 0 6 a; rm(0 0 < 0 C. a; , 0 0 ,-, v) 0 t...; ,..,"1 --. -0 < ,,. r+ ,..• a) -05 a, c 0 Co+ rn' k, n j - a cc a rt rw . a. rD _ , a) 0_ 0 el) = CD 70 CD - - M ti) -L ' o n I -e, • rti (Do . (D o x 0 1 c < U, CZ S -< ,-+- > ec-3 02._ — ,—• Z 2 .) Z o 3 -< Lo- "c IA 4 "-• -kv -.7 - TO '' C Z = n f") . ,e, Z 0 C cm C La c triul ; .= to n cri x ti, v, -, _ 1....) n . in ra 0CO l,-3 0 z IJI m til 7 V) 0 co :1. , t.0 CD s-s- W 1-• r+ -"' On 0 - n) 0 ..' in ics - 0 ir) - 4- E. 7 a) Z - co co OD 0 0) _ ,-). _ fro < 3* < CD . X a z a _ = MOMS (1 SO CO ts.) 33 Cn Cl) m (1, 0) IV KJ fs) 1 1 1 a a a a ...-J C1 OD CO _ r+ Lri (D *- r —.4 .,1 --/ VD LO K . .. ...".. m.0 C.')CD 0 0. M c. C) 0 0 CD Cr, cp ...., _., = Ur1 N.) 0 0 0 1 a 0 0 z a 0 0 a 1 c) • 0 0 Z C 20 0 frl tn --, -. in r A > rfl 0 ;13 r f1 r4. ... 19 -4 -, -. OD - - 0 0 r.. 2 z c r- X" 1111•••• rri < 3 , < < < < > a) a) a) cm a, a 71 MI - ,... .._ ,.., ..... ,-.• - O. (f)- ,,‹ '.< '••••". •••< •-•• r.„-• -0 0 < > 17 1 > 2* > ‘..) 'V 0 cm H3 . • • . r11 —I OP XI C7 I rn > CA ....i , 70 " h.) ..O' cn cr, cir) Cr) 0 w cz, ..... in -+ 0-,, • 0 XS e) 03 = V = -'0 OD 0 LoJ -.I CO LA) >z NJ 0.4 NJ rn W W ila.) W W V --4 ,...! ....1 -3 • ...., --c __, V) CD 7 .... C) c> c.:D CD 0 41 = CD ...I '....i I ,..1 *--.1 --,I 111• a-0 CO CO OD CO 41• W 1....) Cr) ' Cr) ....., co 4 _IZI -4 ta (1) in 0. 0 NJ --__ 5. co co D co r- ...I OD N.1 • cu to (D N (/) 'V < V) " r. < v.. -• n 4 • 0 = '_ N = N -• -n F G (D 77. C Cr)01 CX' LO�C W 0 • O • U'`< O d O fC 7 a) Cr _' p -' •-•, fD p O tD p r+ 3 lD (A • X Q. X a C i- N In Z' N C1 cm 7 ,-* co In Zr*N Z ) a M Z >t, a) fy < fp (t, n ZNv � t,, fL tA) • fL to LID 7- � r -4 Z m xi 1) O NJ 33 �C', V m VI NJCO N N NJ 1T1 NJ NJ NJ r 3 V V V V X V V V DJ in a O a 0 O o a CO CO CO CO '� CO V CO a, D "'_I -. ..... -. .-• lD V to '^ O O O O O O O O r Y/ O a G v) O a O O NJ "I. W NJ 0) ni t0 a O O O O O O O O O O O O O •vi — 0/ti 0 1 z iVl 0 Xi c W m v) 01 O CO N _. CO N © r to C 0 el ?/ T a r 37 a R 4 o Carab T. r < < < < < < < D < v, d w a to to a a, a I . v rn of a > 7C' U La) a0 a � a0 av as 0 7` 7 7' 0 7- 0 7.' 0 X" 0 x = f°'�'1 —1 YO 711 PIA CA NJ NJ NJ .P' NJ W -+ 1Y m al •u, a) a, to 0•A . . (.J1 =. N . W O o co -4 W C) a O .10 co 01 NJ a tC O O P.Z N m N 71 W W W W W tN W 23 V V V V •-.J V V 0 V V .J V V V V w O O O O O O O T V V V V J I V V to CO CO co CO CO co co -4 i i/) ih iR irk -VA -40- V_1 tJl .,1 tD l0 tp OZ lD W 0 O co CD 0 a) to a) Gbh D co to O O O O o., V (0 to uo . C W W a) V O O NJ PJ LD cD . ' V -.' : •.,:, Lo CD ,.., LP Lo 0) C = rct.- ,,, — 0 0 LJ , __ CD 01 ,•',I • = < I'S it, CD *. ,-' . ir-,`‹ :frCD Z X c 0 CD 0 Cu Lri 0.. CO .„. V: --ii. tr.n "N (...) — X a •.' > MONO 141C) -4, r CO 1‘.4 3 : Cil 3 3 3111 COI m (1) Al.,' CIO I.... I f . . ..:. -i N., 1-.0 CD • J 7 •-4 1 CI M I I -s VI 0) = cct) c) r) ,-k• u'l CD .1 , (.....) u.) .=. — vi c) i-. c, CA _ c) ,.. c., • - ,..., vi < — x CO C) "Ti r • r of z , r o • m X3 • -.< CI, „. rn w r tit z -V o n 0 (fl C r% (1) ammo --, ...... oz MilliM ..,„, > 0 9° a fa.) c 213 cr) •< 15' m < .< a cl, x- 7j O ....0 • trn - • In ......k O —1 C --1 m i K.7 rtr 10 Cr) ' ...4 7f.'2 - ...mi t.n Cil 0 0 •-.1 co 44'1110 0 a) "r Z no 0-4 no on 1 N.) w w • •-.1 -,1 '..I ..,1 0 0 --J •-.1 00 03 rell (I? 1" --. -4" , w CC -. ...., .4 VI Lo . . Ul 0 (-Pi I l0 KJ O. cc • •--.1 t.J1 0 " ' CO 0 •-.I ASSESSMENT AMOUNT Construction Cost Bid Amount $141, 583.80 *Construction Contingency ( 10 percent) 14, 158.38 Total Construction Cost $155, 742. 18 Technical Services Engineering Services for Design $ 6, 540.76 *Project Inspection and *Contract Administration (4 percent) 6, 229.70 *Improvement District Management (3.9 percent) 6, 124.20 Total Technical Services $ 18,89/4.66 Bond Costs *Bond Attorney $ 600.00 *Fiscal Consultant 6, 000.00 *Bond Rating 1, 100.00 *Printing and Publishing 600.00 *City Finance Department Administration ( 1 percent) 1, 713. 16 *Capitalized Interest _ 700. 00 Total Bond Cost $ 10, 713. 16 Assessed Cost Total Construction Cost $155, 742. 18 Total Technical Services 18,894.66 Total Bond Cost 10, 713. 16 Tota! Assessed Cost $185, 350. 00 *Denotes Estimates VALLEY INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD SOUTH Assessment Computation Total Cost Rural Section $185, 350.00 Front Footage (with 100 Foot credit to corner lots) 4, 915.00 $185, 350. 00 $37. 71078/F. F. 4, 915.00 F.F. \A RESOLUTION NO. 2014 A Resolution Accepting Bid On Valley Industrial Boulevard South County Road 83 To The East Line of Valley Park 2nd Addition Improvement District No. 1982-2 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of Valley Industrial Boulevard South, County Road 83 to the East line of Valley Park 2nd Addition, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Valley Paving, Inc. $141, 583.80 Hardrives, Inc. 143,832.80 Asphalt Paving Materials, Inc. 144, 125. 55 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. 151, 520.44 McNamara Vivant Construction 165,047.90 William Mueller & Sons, Inc. 192, 134. 50 AND, WHEREAS, it appears that Valley Paving, Inc. , 12494 Wyoming Avenue South, Savage, MN 55378 is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA : 1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Valley Paving, Inc. , 121494 Wyoming Avenue South, Savage, MN 55378 in the name of the City of Shakopee for the improvement of Valley Industrial Boulevard South, Contract No. 82-2 by roadway construction according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1982. Mayor of the City of Shakonep /7' MEMO TO : John K. Anderson City Administrator FROM : H. R. Spurrier City Engineer • RE : VIP Sanitary Sewer Interc:ptor- Improvement District 1981-1 DATE : June 11, 1982 Introduction : Attached is Change Order No. 2 for the VIP Sanitary Sewer Interceptor. The work specified in the Change Order covers the additional electrical work required for the Meter Station. Background : The electrical work required is to supply the Meter Station with electrical power from a CertainTeed power source. That power source was not available until February 2, 1982 when the City entered into an agreement with CertainTeed Corporation. The electrical work was not performed sooner in order to avoid digging through frost. This Change Order results in an increase of $2, 270. The net change to the contract for Change Order No. 1 and No. 2 is a net increase of $270. There are funds encumbered for this amount. Action Requested : Direct the appropriate City Officials to execute Change Order No. 2 for the VIP Sanitary Sewer Interceptor Improvement District 1981-1. Change Order No. 2 provides for an increase of $2, 270 and no increase in completion time. HRS/jiw Attachment /1 CHANGE ORDER Change Order No. : 2 Project Name: VIP Sanitary Sewer Interceptor Date: June 1, 1982 Contract No. : 81-1 Original Contract Amount $ 617,823.65 Change Order(s) No. 1 thru No. -- $ 2,000.00 (deduct) Total Funds Encumbered Prior to Change Order $ 615,823.65 Description of Work to be (Added/Deleted): Dig trench and install four No. 6 conductors approximately I-80 L.F. from CertainTeed to Meter Station No. 1 The above described work shall be incorporated in the Contract, referenced above, under the same conditions specified in the original Contract as amended unless otherwise specified herein. Any work not so specified shall be performed in accordance with the Standard Specifications adopted by the City of Shakopee, Minnesota. The amount of the Contract shall be (increased4deaneaseck) by $ 2,270.00 The number of calendar days for completion shall be (increased/decreased) by 0 . Original Contract Amount $ 617,823.65 Change Order(s) No. 1 thru 2 $ 270.00 Total Funds Encumbered $ 618,093.65 Completion Date: Same The undersigned Contractor hereby agrees to perform the work specified in this Change Order in accordance with the specifications, conditions and prices specified herein. ._.__[[ �f Contractor: c.l may., C 7; 46.4C,. . BY: ' L �� Title: Date: ��-8 Z-1-7c24< '` . APP"s"• AND RECOMMENDED: fij3 City E giie•r D to APPROVED: C- ty of Shakopee By: _ Mayor Date Approved as to form this day of City Administrator Date 19 City Clerk Date City Attorney it-Q) MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Ice Arena Lease with Shak-O-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc . DATE: June 10 , 1982 Introduction John Goihl , at the May 18, 1982 Council meeting, requested that the City review its lease and possibly "clear the air" about the City' s long term intentions regarding the ice arena. John stated that if the City' s intent was to be made clear it might be possible for Shak-O-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc. to increase Prior Lake ' s and Chaska ' s financial participation in the arena . Lease I have reviewed the lease which is for a five year period ending September 16 , 1985 ( Sec . 2 . 1 ) with a renewal clause (Sec . 15 . 1 ) that permits renewal for additional five year periods . There is no language in the lease or the authorizing resolution which states or even implies that the City of Shakopee has any intentions of taking over the arena operation at the end of the lease should the structure be paid for and the arena be operating at a breakeven level . Moreover, it is the recollection of the City Clerk and Community Services Director that neither the former City Administrator or the Council wanted to take over the operation of the arena at some future date . Contacts I have spoken with John Goihl and the City Administrators of Chaska and Prior Lake . The administrators both indicated, without having discussed the matter with their City Councils , that they could not see their cities getting involved financially in any hockey arena. They suggested , however , that it would be a positive step for all three communities if the private hockey associations got behind one arena to insure its success . Mike McGuire from Prior Lake also reminded me that several years ago a joint Prior Lake/Shakopee effort to construct an arena had failed and that there has been renewed interest in Prior Lake to construct their own arena . I passed the above information about our lease and the suggestion by the Administrators from Prior Lake and Chaska on to John Goihl . John will contact the other hockey associations after Tuesday' s Council meeting so that he can clearly demonstrate to them what the City of Shakopee ' s intentions are . Alternatives 1 . Make no statement about our future intentions . 2 . Make it clear that the City does wish to take over the arena once it has paid off its capital debt and is operating in the black. Mayor and City Council Page Two June 10 , 1982 3 . Clearly hopethat thecurrent the lease canberenewed forsuccessive prefers rarun that we pethat five year periods . • 4. Other Recommendation Staff recommends alternative No. 3 . Alternative No. 3 is in keeping with the efforts of the Community Services Board to run programs through volunteer groups with a specific interest in an activity. This type of cooperation provides the Community Services Board the opportunity to coordinate programs while insuring that a high level of interest and adult volunteer activity will keep the program strong. Action Requested Pass a motion formally stating the City' s intention to renew its Lease with Shak-O-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc . as long as the lease conditions are met , and stating that the City prefers not to get into the operation of the ice arena . JKA/jms MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Budget Worksheet Format Proposal DATE: June 4 , 1982 Introduction When staff prepared the 1982 Budget last summer and fall we included a draft of a proposed budget worksheet that we believed would be a useful tool for both staff and Council in understanding the true cost of individual programs . A copy of the proposed worksheet is attached. Logis Programming Costs After numerous efforts to develop an understanding about what we were looking for with Logis staff we finally succeeded. As a result we have one estimate of what it would cost to set up the requested bud- get worksheet and a second estimate for a report using a format developed for Brooklyn Center and recommended by Logis ( sample attached) . The estimates for both programs are attached. Alternatives 1 . Drop the idea and purchase no new reports . 2 . Proceed with the development of the program/division budget worksheet as originally planned. 3 . Proceed with the purchase of the alternative format recommended by Logis . Summary & Recommendation The cost differential exists because it would be more difficult to program the budget worksheet we have proposed , it would require more time to run the program and more space to store. In addition the Logis program could be run monthly or quarterly replacing our current program report , whereas the format we proposed would be only an annual budget worksheet . I find the alternate format much more useful than our current program budget format and Logis has said that we could add a 5th column for total budget and a 6th column for percentage spent to use for monthly comparisons at one or two more dollars per run. Finally , as you can see from the example of the proposed alternate format , even Brooklyn Center has not done any true budgeting for programs and expense according to programs (note all the zeros in the "other costs" column except for the nonallocable expense) . It will take staff awhile to create meaningful budget breakdowns for other expenses by object and; therefore , perhaps it is best to begin with the less expensive manual program. Mayor and City Council /1 June 4, 1982 Page Two Action Requested 1 . Order the Brooklyn Center consolidated program report format from Logis with two additional columns for budget comparison. 2 . Direct staff to include manually prepared consolidated program budget worksheets in the 1983 Budget . JKA/jms • • j 1 UuE1flJ 111111 IOCAI OOVF RNMF NI INFORMATION SYSIFMF. ASCCK'.!ATV IN 6820E Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Min }esota 55430, (612) 566-0050 TO: Greg Voxland , City of Shakopee FROM: Chuck Krattenmaker DATE: May 27, 1982 RE: SPECIAL BUDGET WORKSHEET REQUEST This memo is in response to your request for a cost estimate to assist the City of Shakopee in their budget preparation. Based on a preliminary review of the program needed, the costs associated with the programming, and the running and maintenance of the program are as follows : Specific tasks to be completed include: - Flowchart and write the program - Test program and implementation My estimate of charges for performing the work is as follows : PART I . REPORT REQUEST BY JOHN ANDERSON A. Programming and testing $900 (one-time) B. Running charge 75 (per report) C . Storage charge 18 (per month) PART II . REPORT USING RECOMMENDED FORMAT A. Programming and testing $250 ( one-time) B. Running charge 15 (per report) C . Storage charge 4 (per month) These estimates are based on experience with other programs in use , but which are smaller and less complicated. The charges for these would be based on actual usage and could be above or below the estimate . CK/sp . 7 _ I/' �` o -w n• • •w . e ..•, •i :-'4 T" c. [ T-'n . 1 • • o - n . i . o p - N •• ♦ r o N r. o r.�• s w -•• .1.N•N• • "_ ---k n .. N e r, ..-7,-.)-% n n 7 ., • • , • . _n r, r;n r r n n N • • • • •.._• • ... r • • • • Toia' I00 - • MI M .0 UTN- •..CC,a c`IN-•Min.0 0^.-1 I) C44 0„0,• •-, P.In m•0 N ..C.O. N I J N - A r.,A 1.0 0 N Noe )0..,0,M 0'0 C 0,!C'C.AIM f It, ,^. C N 00 0 M.r 0 e 10,U' r• C C.0 I a N • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • 51051 . 1 . • • • • • • • • • •' • • • • • • O IFC N N't 10`0 M OIIf)N.D t f 10'• co PIM 0 CO c,N I).4 N N r• 0 c .0 O M A N:N.O U'C 0 Z 100 ... 0N 10.0 u N10'A t,.•CO 0'0,.4 W 0,A O!,0 0.y.0` 0 N CC 0'It)N•.O A CO N 0 r'O 0 10.1J c N1 ) 10.0 A 010 C,.r O.4.0.0 t NIM..•N.N• M'M t 0, M N C N Gi.0 0.r'M.s 17) .- (00 •W • • • M N • • • • • •M 44'44 N 4 N • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0,bIT I 0,01.0.r L.i01 r,'.•• 'N 't n 00 ('4'M M A u 4 M.N.0 M A IF .0 4 0.410 44.4144 tD riM 1 • MM in IM M N MN N NN M M'N.r MOON ai N N!M M; M N, M . N IMI I 0;0 N IM-. 44 44 1 1C0 u1c,11,0 00 O GIO O Q U o 0 O C O 'O N M O Co A,.. 00 c,'C O OI V La lin 0 c• c C c, IICC VI O'OIO, 00 c OloIn0,c,r,nip00I0n0Mc, c, t Cnc'Ct01000,0001.•.4 cnCr0u ., jilt 1.• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • IM SO ! CO N10 0,U' M Mi* N 44 4 44 M'M M M 44 44..1,0 N M.t IP- ON MIN N 44!44 M 4410,N 4404444 i%. I.-0 t 0.->, .D.O N j n,o m I C' .0 In ! M 0 O, CV 00 rNM .0' C'N .40.11 .4.-; M IAA .r • • M M • • • • 4 • • • • .441.4A .•1 CMM , AA i M.4• • .riM '� N M1 M M • q MMM M IM • LL 0 • I ; • N • OC i . 1 I • • f 00 • Mf.Or .4 1P. t . O.! •r.40. COOC? OCI' U1N) ,IO` • 'i V) r MIU °II ) n 4 H • N O coC' O ►.N 0 N 011111.•1.rl T P1 O O 0 cm N 0,0.4 0 t 0110 rf.).OM, 40'0 N Mi.r U) :,!A M • .r C,CO .0 V)CL • •I • • • • • • • •' • • • • • • • • •;• • •; • • •, •, • • • • • •. • • • • • O a MMM N-M M rf I0 cf.0 f t U)t co CN .0 A M N 010 c, *I '1111...O f:M t 01.1 t U' c0 In U J N �N O NI T A t.4 CC 0%O,.4 M O,A A . 0.4 0, .D W' 0,1111 N t:c+• O..r 0 O c.'CC U) IO A 0100•.••0.+.00*MM.rN *M.r CDA.O' N,C2 U1 O!,OC,..'.O M RAO, O, N O 0 • i • •1 • • • •••••!••M 4 M • • • •N •; • • • •; • • • • • . . • • • ► 0 0 CO CO 0'0I.0••0 0 1 N t 01 IM t; N'M M A e t M,• Cr M A 0 0 U .r .4 M.C4400M N M • C'O M M, 444444NINM Ml.- c MOWN w M M M' 00 44 • .-C .I NSM N IM .• - M > 144 N CO • H . • Z J W1r a H ON 000 _ OC • 0-00A00000000000010 OAA 00c O00cIU0 t .r(D0 2 • •' • • • • •',1• • • • • 5 5 • • • • • • • •C • • • •I •j • • • • • •i • • • •. • • O!W 0_ 0 10 co a0.0 AI A CO.4 f C t0I TN O 10 • m.O• osier,c- AIM • C..)! O, .0 .0t • o.Cr�t OMt.O0iT.rA0'M .0M 1r .O .0Nf1` NIN.0.00HA rf 0 t r.c� N 0.0 WO_ • 4 ICA .0NO,I* W IO I0 '0 NIMMC'1N0M • 0A-•- .r pW, a CO CO CO.O 0 ..'M M C ,') Y .4 I 0-1...I I m Y ! l IO Ni 0 ' HIO: • V).CO a L.*u. Z W ., H . ( H IW • I O O.. CA S DI-N • • r U O 12 C9 ala J 4 !W 2 O`F- W2 , _= S 2 a��xle - > I IX A v.I.y > 1 =0 O Y W Mi(UI W LL O 0 I W!- = Y Z 001 0 - Z W11°.r 10 Y, 2, I W Y 2 OC I OU W 4 0 U I• •-•O. U 0-...1 I 4 CLIP. a O a. I ' ' .r Ma- P. 0122 >0 W 2 •-• W 0. Y C' . I,1O 7 �Y1• CI-,iO ......1"140..10 14 Y •-I J 4 0. 0 Z >1- W W 014 4 U0,-4 N W C Z'r w W;a •'C•1 m W 4" a U 4 .42 fL 7 MCC I W 1DI0*- ,U>4 vN 1-0 > G. OI J 14 > G d • cr I 1-0 .41Z• •••!, W04, 47414 W U m 0 I 4 Z a.2 1-.,..3.40U a Z O 4C C) OC • WOil.0IKJ CCO>ZI CD V; 01 CO I W:OYtgi4NZ.O WOYJ O J W .4 4.f.1...UI Y.M Z a*412 J, •U 2. 1-1-4 _J 4.4 U 6.4..U•r.-.J • J•-U a Ci V)CC I1- 1-10 2*4 U. 2•4 W 2 N •..VC.r.rl V)P. IF-O Z$4.4 4 2,J •- O Cc CL .,p C Y 4!•••r 22 Y aIVNV)••IJ • Sa' •J`M! ' ' 1.rU Y'4 ►+••aO ••4 X00-.LiCOmI 4 UU''J,=WOOE724422IOm.C'. U' W UIUJL!W114�Z UUJ2 1 W 4' X •-.a;Ol0 J0 a 0 0 0 2 W 0 0, •O Ji1-4400iJ O. C C' a+a C W -J-J1 U N>ixU&iiu0. xx. uC-xc� 2l.-+a mI IW J CLI 1 N>x QIU4)- Z W> 200.r' 0 .•.N t�A 00 T C)--C N M t.O 00 O,IO.r'MI 100 •+IN M Cir.N M't •••N•M ._ NN N CCOINNNMMIMMMMMMt.tol l4 * r,:c•r:U'IU,000, , cnC .0 M,ct, ..f r,r•c,tn0c r,r 0 C'>nC r C? ,p ON 10 e, • rN*-- nrIr, c'LI . k ; W • • U U CC - Z! .4 I II I Li- 11 0 .. ' CC cn 001 N 1-. N O 7 . Z Cr : Z W C0 a z CO .I a 0 iI LI'- -. CC a I 1 v) I 'U 1. 4, I Z W C :U A N N f I-. C.0 a 1 2 CC Y U W I 0. = 4I A I 1.1 N 2 .r W 0 x 4-, ....1 0 ; -• ;4-M O c. c' ! U U I W j l a i LL � en • • I I Z • t In ,0 1- .a r'I -+ .4 I-4 CI i j I ' , I . I 0 I n n.• •IN e o ^ Nlr • nI• N N ;IN .n. N N n I' N ° 'n . din O •. $ : . • v v • • v '• i n•n c ,% n r. 11)( C v r _ .. - r . r - . - - rs r ., C P r,.• C ,i;-,. ,1"2-t- I. t, c, PP .• ft 4 fr. V r, • • ii_ r, ,,,, 2 ...• ... ,t., '..--------- -------e.. " " .. ' ‘ ' C 7.1-74'..- 0' ::',4 L r.. i....t.1. R. ; ;') ;',.A r•• r . r :, • • •2...• 4 • .....• 1 I.12,lot•••1 r. r_.:......- ,......!.._lo._,c_-__,._± .- - (----- ---.) t. • • 0 • I, • • _ _ _ _ _ _ __________ :. i_____-__ ._,..--• . -- , , , ;: . .__ _, ----1----- , , . 1 i i . . , • . . . i • 1 i• . , .• I ! 1 1 i . 1 . i ; 1 1 1 I i 1 i , 1 I 1 1 . I i . 10,. %el PI 0 . c, e: CP;Cm P. 0 •T C2 0,P.C4 CM14)PI())4p (-I P114,cl 9.114)pl MC)0 calc)a V) cula 4... 0`,0 CP U, , Nific0* lin 1 1..10 ri, o10, ..,. ,„,;„, ill c)oa- • • • • • • • 1 14 4- ! • se * * . . locoop. opeoper foe • • • • • • • poolloc s 0 lo. 0.4.4000,c-4..C- WeICOP.0100P.0,40P-!P- MO,C.N .., CON0010000441MN0NINON4"001""0.10 ° 444`01,.. v .-, NNM 4' 0 iC 100 ,cCOun ..cs, ::..7 ,:, 4.C.) .44 4r644,44. ca ca aa 0 un p.,C4*4 e),.4 a ca.N Cr.4.r.4 cu,cy 0 0.0 P.%WO 64 ,N N 4 0.4r pn*.4 or 61 44 • • 0 0. 0 0 01 40 44 0 0 10 44 • • •• • • • • IP J Jn CPACINI.41r 0 I 0, 1.04:1 ,00mo olirnortnocolo,immAvoNio co,* • 01 0 ...1.... awne,..., 1,-1,,orn.0c.icacn..101000i0 ...00 ! a cv.0wm0 00 Q., N a a 010 0 a; 0,..pl 0, a 4,444 a i IN 0 1 tv W 00.. aa, i 10 69 1 , • . 1 10 i , , ! • .4 44 1 -a 1 Ii I , , 1 , 1 i0 01 0 I / ID 00Jra0 C ala 0 cal I - c,10 4a N ea 4a a 0 Ca c... '0 C c...104 la 0I4).0 0i0 0 PI ' PI!Pl r N 1`.. 1.4 1M I44. IN •• U.C) IC:00 ::.0:CI CM 00 . i!CD, 11.1 0. • 44 .4 • i4- C) OD" 61...1 1.121 0 .OU Of 0 .44 OD • ,..rn .4 • a , en. 1 Cr 4p 41.1 ID 0, ......* 44-a 1 .010 ID ro Cr C:c:14.0 0 Ca 0 CD En el 0104 CI cnica 0 cniCa un 0 eve:co • 6 4., • • • • • 0140 6*4: 44 g t 44 44 4414;V;44144 44 44 ' 0 0 i or ..• a WI as • • •1 o • w .0t000l••• • • ailo oo oi to) cv 01 0 41 • • 0 04 4,1,... ; .7,1?,,,,i ,4 ••••11 4*i 10110 1)'W) cres' 041 • wi000a.4 ' 1.1?41 . we.. , I.:Cm • • Ni7 WI: W a.ul la 4r a i . a C. . • • am ' . 0 . , 0 000100 rm0, t 1 omi....m.oronrolo-,cacooroolo,:-. noirale)lc)wool - -r- so c,o I--0 0 0 calla un Ca 0 0 04 al Wip,0 ello,or oio co r-lo a)os po a VD41 CD 010 17,crlcn CO P. e).0 .00 fn ct • • •, • • .0111 0, 11 • 0' 00010 .- 1, 001 , 0 •10 “ 4 • 0 • 00. 000: • • • • • • • • OW 004.14,0 400 01 cm1.6 co 0 CP 40.4 g.OP 00 0 COICM CM Oirs P- C.C)0 P.P. Os 64/0 64 cc, rn ... .,., .1 r- r-rn• U...I .in .4 ODIN000 010.-4WNNN,NONi040004.-4p;00 , .r r-cONN.CP .4. 0 WI %I) alio 0 p.C4 MI.4 0 pity CD 4.41P. *NICY 0 0 PI P- voi0 0 ' P1 MNMP.,..4 * 4 00 • 0 . .. 4. ..4. ., • • • • 4.1_ _ _, _ _ _ _op • • I c. i45 . • . • . • I.%)0a 000 e511,1 0 r-ir,N WIN 00 Om U2 N Pa cei4r p. 0'' N.4,4 ,440 U M Mt0M... p.x, *PlIONWlo_44144 _ _In .410 0.1 N m0..-4 .440 .4 .4 I aim-am 4.•.4-4 tn NI ••4,4•••0 i ••4 *Al .4! M. 444 ..4 In. a mm 40I I a 1 4.: '..444 1 'Pc W 10 I . I.. i Z -1 a ee os. i 1 1 Ilw z croWoo mo-loc.oc.000.ctooc.o.ociemposoac, co. o3,orim' c. Into 1-11-. 0 0 4 JI • • • 4%)C; 101.00000 . 0 . 1190806 0 . 0 . 60 .01 . 04w, 00 . 6. . 490 00 I ctiz 0 CC P.i 0 a'10 0 p- .4 4r r4 0 a)N Pliun 4r 02.4.4 r- Un 0,4r 0 : 1..... OIC)PI C.)•-• Cr. L. ail/J Ce M CC P1100 N M00044.CM01..0000 0 .410 4-c• 011..0'0el 1-04 CLIC) 4.1 CD n coM0 Nor-alNa.41.-M.4.4141.4 4•,..1. 0 1..- N4r0 1.1, a.x . . . . . . . .; . 0 • 0., •• •• N*M. 00040' N.40.41 M.4 01 CPI In VD r4 WI 4-4 . 0 N ,N p.I.J . . CUNC /0 1-,14C . 0 ULL . La I.- 181 4,41 It a W LI 0 0 r 41C4. 0 W 0 W 2 64. Z U14.14. IZU Z *D. 101 0 or W0e2 14.1Z 1...1 er s- 0.0. . a. I 10 cem C0.4 ..i '0.4 . 0_ .0•4 la 1.1 1 pc . Icj P.C:/, DC U. U.'CC PC IX Z Ft.4) . CC CC 2! 00 • CP 4-P. 04 ZZ IF- X 044.00 0( 4Waa Cr IC 2 ..11 I- t/ 41V0 Li IC CC 0 3t 0 L., V. Al LIZ ta2 0Z z.* w.-$0 .41m =aciu 0.j 0 W U.Z:3 EJ W W 0 1...1(7) V) , 0. 4 W W om 14" I ws. ).- -.14.-r• 4,-* 0:01: vc .jo-w.* m ;- I V146 O! cli*1,-•0 pr.i Zlo z ols- 50 a 0 ,a3 4C ! W10200. 0.1.40WZ 0.0W0WP4 iota. 4(12 4C! 0P.10,"'W0. 0MM 210 0U..11.4,720ip 6114JO.P.!P. 00104..1 10Z1010.00AJ WI'S* . 0 200 0 •-, LI Y-1 >- W Z' 0- ..i W :3 CD D. 6J 0 (.) mr20 a O. a az too I 0 wino... i ...P0-4* 1c0-0....4-.Juk •-o-lawo. 0,..10U=1..1.-..12 1 0. .-0 -J 1 cc 0 ty. 1 st i 2 Wr. 100CC1Z 1..J...JWa 1 000,10 U 4 r- W 0 0 11,-'00.JZMOUIP-24C1WWWICC 0UMUZ.U.-. 1 -IC0*.WZ41..1WWI-IICCP4CLIW=0I00.1...1000P.rW..0.00 i u10..110224-W=410aCIM.00170.J,..$-Ja;Z= 1 ....4c04..1r- POZa u-Io 2 Z a 0 21w ce 0ii•J 0 cc,0 0 ,i wla201c/57* ...,mcsluo-0m,-. ..i* m12coatrao-,2X i 1 .41csuelp- ,colowrcola,c3.-4icoincrIwr- co10.4cslirler-losi.- 2 .. ...1 w.•- * .--,cc •- c‘ u....1.-- tc z sD'P- rc.Cm' , Ica Ut.) ....< 0 7 •--I Cv Ca 04 04.4 .4 CD Co CI, Cm.....N 04104 V4 CUIN 01 VIVI PI PI MI WI:TP.,4 0 I WI WI..-MI r..,C v./•••I••••••• .4 f...00 C. nC 1r4••••••1•••11,1•••r41...'..•••Il..... 1 ••••••-••••-••-• ••t 1 . . . . 0 0 CI • - .... ,.. 0. 1Cc Z ,....) .... I Z • a. - 0 w I4,J il4 I- Z 10 4.I O../ 0 0. I U fl.... I I" •P . * 2 m . cc 61 0 LI. I t 0 . US- 41 . CC 2' Z P- J• 1....4 Q. . 04 W CC U1...) 2 0 * EC 1.4 LL, Zi 0. I*. 4..I CC 0! . 0.W 61 C., 04 c C) 0 0- lc. • 0-. . CC • cv I • srl , 0.1 P2! .....1 •••• el r) v,i inj u. 1 mo , 1 1 , . o .o 0 .. ,.., ... ,,--L-,-o-,-t---,o . o, ---I--._ N ,..,., --. ., ..e .,-. ,,,, .. . ,z ro ;..,,,,,-.:-.,• -•-•; ,,,,,•• .o., r..., - • ^'• " • '''' • • ° - N '' ' '.' ' ' N114 •1111f414 /114 ri .2 r, ,in en ,., on r. , in ,.. . . _ ,". 1 ,-:,.2-,,.'121,j,,,Li."1,ff.L,I.,.., ,,,-,,i,:,114Ual,'W• 40414*444000e• / - - o-N n • n• n •e o - f ^ ,, (..M1.. - a • e r s-...."-r. .- v- i s t 72,--;.. -'h� f. r r c • c - or:---1-7-0---E.r. h ^�' -h r!• n • r • P N N N N h N Y f _ • • • • • • • • A I• t o IIS n M f_A • • ( O i O i i;t I II 1 -, - I 1 I ! I 1 CO I ' i I j , •CC.OM NT O •'.D TOIMO O!P Into.0M NO:PT c.• 40C ._• CO N!IACO CIO id ., C,Ic, CNNN .J N .O If).4 M!U1 Al. 0.D ).41o.N N1 A 0 T c.N N 0, N .4 O'M 4 r-;0,N 0,,r. SCO Imo C N 10•-/ ,4 I- • • • • • • • • • •I • • • • • • • • • • • • • •: • • • • • • • • •' • O' • !I- N !d N U1 O:O 4 O'•-•co.0.a4 t. P1 T P in.If' .0 .4 Oi If) .0 N DDI0 d O.0 o NIM In PI T O C) In.• N T in a 2 OO .•.0 d U) .0..•-•..0 CO TIN 0.-I Cc M M!In T I P .O.on.-• In 0'I.•1 n M!Md MB 0.M!.0 .r d.-f.0 PM .0d ,F U .O In U) 0,,44:1 N 0 In 0' 0',O 0'0:0 P .0 i.O N G NIM In N PI. co OI.O P PIN r)q+N In 0 a 1.1.o N.o 4 !W • • • • • • 440555 . • • •. • • I • N • •N•• • • • • •IN • • • •N •N N • • • (.0 .a N M .i:Ci d N .1.I!O M iN.•di..•N d d N IM r)d •_, .-.If)'. .4 NI 60 In .-1 1....•W.).• 4 IN M U) N,-•N 0 N NW)N .0 0 4,4 4‘• 0. N N i 44 10 4 N N'.N N N 0 014P. N N N .4 N 0.: , N.a IN I IN N 1 N I N 64 44, I I 1 I. I � • 11 I 1,4a)O ! S C h •"1 N 0'o d .D 0'O 0 v N d N .O O h N C•O hO 010 O O!o O NIM M al..... 4 Ca (>!C, O L.,CC c I\ ,Cr 6Ic d at MOd I1,60 CO.-1,P N Nc'. CO.0017 P 0•'•CO H O:O 4#j d A 0/IPP0 MI.0 00 of I:' .C)!O c. ' I .a It., I- • • • I ' •� • . •' • • •: • • • • • • • • • •j • • • •i • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • M SN 146%0 %0'. 0!Od Oi.•ONINN P .•1ANON NO!.y 1') dd�0•401^(OPMHOiO O C,Inc:. NJ.(ON IN. I-0 M W) O.O ..t,.0 O MIM,-a ..T M MIIf d • ON C1/41 MCO 0.In O.jI d M f O Mi.-/ ..n d .•IM r- d ,, IN 10 U O 01 0'.O N MAO 0'0'!•0 CO 4.P N ai.O Co d NIN P O N 0'co TIO 0 AIN N P.IP O0 M. d: .0 0,4..4 ! • •.-:• • •N • •1 • • ,N • • + a • 44 . 4• •0 • • • • •NM •1 • •M •N N 44 • In -I P d Nli, .♦.-I M M .4 M I...CO .a .•1 N .4 17 M).0 M I ..I WO M -'•. M .I 4..440: NNfAN NN:NO N N 0 000,4 0. NN M 0 N •• N N 44 N N 0 LL I O 1 4 I I N OT N! [•000070. PO0lei OO OL^ 0010/N C OIMc.OU Or IO O4d .,C CI r. C' NsN PN .00PI 000 .0000'0 O A co NO0' 1 OOIO•d O OP 0OI O Op IO M cc,C\/ OOCj-c. NO c N C • • •, • • • •: • • •i•• • • • • • • • I • • • • • • • • •I • • • • • •! • • • • • • • • • 0 4 d .D CO, 44 0 4 0 0 0 .IN In M O N M N M co N M N CD d•M alit).. slob 17.410) N N N_N N T:P a 0.0J ..C94 •ION 0' O O N 0 .-1 10 • .-1 .1 010 0' 0' IO TO OS0 J %I)0.•'M 0 M.•I N 0 •1 P.O d . • I N.••10. 0I M 40 •a MIM .0 N d Vf 0 • • ac I•N N • • • 10 • 0 • • • •44' • 1 •N • I W 0 .•.P.OI J ... .I M N N M a ../ rl T .O .-I U N.•MI I 44 0 0 N 44 N 4..•44 44 .4 .4 N w M PAI4. N N I M cc ! + W ' N 2' J Icr W 2 0010, c•0p co0 0co0 0 N .40 CO 0.•• 0NO •D O O0MI ST MC0N TIM OC`c- 0OTN10 I f O N • • •. •U . • •. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • s • • • • • • • • i C 2 N C .0 0 O••I O- Co M, 0 T ..(4 4 O!0 0 In 0) N M.O . :N 4 W 1 C 0 P 0 • .101 N .0 d M 4 *+•I N 0 In M .-I Q)..M ! .0 .O CO 0.0 W 0 .4 Y) N .-1 O I .0 P N I U7 M M ;In .0 M W' a S •__ I • • • 0 2 `4 I ") 'd ! M. Y� CD' 3C ,0 1 to o s-0 (n m U IL W V) 2 2! O rn P. 4 4, Z 2 ••••.... o re 41,- I WW W 0 V) ••• tD' 0)11- I d 7 2 41 Z - . •D to 01 ..J .' Oil..., K CO W.0 PWW P. CI 0 S O0 W 4 I 2=2 ►'•S N 1) 0' I fL 0 O F CI W V)I WICD C Z 0.. W v I JI . U .1 Y 4-4 > a• J J CIY NI40WIvacc C IN 0, (n2 2 S ►UWO'U vCN i 2 CO .J 4 S 1-+J 1- ZI J J W W Oft I J V) 10 0, W 1- 4 4 JJ i0_ 1••1 4JJKt- C.,4.0 JC., 2 yt0 S' !f► h, C C Cr t:. U 14 J•D'4 UI...!J 014 4 W I- W 4I1-• IZ 1-'2 t) 1.-0 0 0D IZU ImC Y o : ;0.1..1 OCD 1W 3S 01 - IO VfOI.4W V),. 1•+W 1D I 0 I P...1 '.D COIW S P. 0 P. O V)'O tr CI•Q a WI Y Y V)12 Id U. N0-164>C C F-I-,J T I2 CC :C Z 0 v C 2 ..J ' W010 COW W 2'O w I O W•4 W W 0 W P..4 C:. C' 4 44 Z a. 11•••4 0 YC W 1-4.-1-.4-1- ajJJW2 }H; C K2KU,Y0. YIV)P. W' :S II. 1-01- 0. '4Z 2N 04'01-2IIa.ti. I7J-IV C 41U ONISUU'40.2!6J 21-' IfL CD J►+04 ..4•-. I i ICC ! 4i4CCCS0WI0000C'0I4 . 00,4 I S WC:1..0O;J C O►r' OIL'. ,00C'M ZY3 4-2 CC CO D']UICt. dVf NV) V)'' 2.. a S 214 Y OcaoSV/IQ. 0.1-a W 4. '00007In cityto I N d .4 N 0 .0'T co.611.1 d 10'P CC T.a P .41 N CC P.r N M!d M 10,1.•Co co, !sr.0 P ct T '...N Q)CO TI T T 0'C,OC O ClC C.,O.A .t N'N I N N M M M,M M M'M M M. I d d d d d In In V) !N N N N N N M M M M on M M M'M MMM M M M fl MI M M M M M MI I M Y.M. M . M M M { II I i i IiIt I a C I z' I a • i IH ( Io `' IJ I- 0 IC ( cc +42 OO 2 R. Wi I - d 2 W JI r r 4. I 4 WC I I- CoI IO CI j 1 2 w 2 0 0 0 LC4 ,- I I U COI I I 1 N - i I \I O i 1 •-II 2 N: C/.1 M I M I.D Cr P .0 IO M I a I I CI o I I I i f1.? ... ... N ' ." . t nn - Ni- • - e !" HN1 n « « I» 2 a n a n P: Y - n iir'i i gii i . 1 . . . cIn .. �C: C; C C C• 0 CL', ' i 46()_ MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Site #31 Shakopee Sludge Farm DATE: June 10 , 1982 Introduction On June 8 , 1982 John Leroux and I reported on the Hearing Examiner' s findings that Site #31 was intrinsically suitable for land spreading of sludge at agronomic rates . During that discussion I mentioned that Rod Krass and I were separately seeking more information. Problem Attached is a letter from Rod with good news about the full meaning of the Hearing Examiner' s recommendations about intrinsic suitability for applications of sludge at agronomic rates . But , in talking to Bill Sando I 've learned that the Hearing Examiner' s recommendations are only recommendations , and that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Board will meet to make the final ruling. That meeting will be July 13 , 1982 at 9 : 00 a.m. in the MPCA board room at 1935 West County Road B2 , Roseville . At the meeting the Board will take no new testimony but will allow people to speak to emphasize previous testimony. The Board will have a staff report in addition to the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation and Bill Sando will be sending us a copy. Alternatives 1 . Send someone to the meeting to restate our case against use of the site for a sludge farm. 2 . Send someone to the meeting to restate our case and indicate our preference °atthe Hearing ratesExaminer' s shouldrthemsiteabeofoundabout applicationsagronomic intrinsically suitable. 3 . Send written communications . 4 . Other Recommendation Staff recommends alternative No. 2 because if the site is approved for agronomic rates the MWCC will prohibit stockpiling sludge , etc . on the site . Action Requested Designate a representative , preferably the Mayor and/or John Leroux, who has been close to this subject , to attend the meeting JKA/ jms :, 170r7i,pry ,„D Ilt Law Offices of J(l;'v 13E2 KRASS, MEYER, KANNING, & WALSTENOF v Chartered f,;P , SP AKOPE Phillip R. Krass Shakopee Professional Building Barry K. Meyer 1221 Fourth Avenue East Philip T. Kenning Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Trevor R.Walsten (612)445-5080 June 9, 1982 Mr, John Anderson City Administrator 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear John: I have discussed Mr. Nettles' Report of Hearing Examiner on the intrinsic suitability of Site 31 with Mr. Nettles and with John Hoeft, Chief Counsel for the Metropolitan Counsel . Mr. Nettles was understandably reluctant to discuss his findings in particular indicating that to do so would be contrary to the procedure hearing examiners follow. However, he did refer me specifically to Finding No. 48 which reads as follows: "Site 31 is proposed as a land spreading site for the spreading of sewage sludge at rates consistent with common agricultural applica- tions of nutrients (agronomic rates) . The MPCA Staff recommendation of Site 31 is limited to land spreading only of sewage sludge generated at the Blue Lake Wastewater Treatment Plant at said rates. " You will recall that Mr. Nettles later recommended that Site 31 be found intrinsically suitable for Blue Lake Wastewater sewage sludge land spreading at agronomic rates. It would be my reading of his Findings and recommendation that the intrinsic suitability would be limited to the use of that land in the same manner as any other farm land would be utilized. I discussed my conclusion with John Hoeft of the Met Counsel who consulted with his staff and spoke to me again indicating his view was consistent with mine. He also querried whether or not as a result of this Finding, the Waste Control Commission would again consider placing the property on the market for sale. He felt that was a real possibility. At any rate I shall take no further action until I hear from you. Yours very truly, KRASS, MEYER, KAIVNING & WALSTEN CHARTERED___ Phillip R. Krass PRK:ph File l-1373-123 MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Property and Liability Insurance DATE: June 10, 1982 Introduction The City's property and liability insurance expires 6/30/82. Included on the policy are Community Services, SPUC and HRA. Quotations were solicited by advertisement and by mailings of notices. The City is not required to bid or obtain quotes for this insurance. Background The City has received two quotations. One from our current carrier, Transamerica, with whom we have had many years of very satisfactory service. The other quote is from the League of Cities Insurance Trust. Both quotes involve the Capesius Agency, Inc. as the local agent. One of the main differences in the quotes is that Transamerica is quoting renewal of our coverage of $300,000/300,000 limits while the League quote is for $500,000 combined single limit. The attached memo dated 6/10/82 addresses additional areas of concern and is an integral part of this memo. The attached comparison drafted by Capesius provides more detail regarding the two quotes and the also attached quotation from the League gives some general information and detail on their quote. The basic quotes are: League Transamerica $ 34,417 $ 36,145 1) Increase automobile deductible to $100 for comprehensive and $250 for (2,075) (1,156) collision. ded Included 2) Utility Supply Failure coverage (est.) 700 I 4,120 3) One million umbrella 2,678 The League program is new, it has been in operation for only two years and uses an independent company for adjustment services and has the insurance with two companies (umbrella coverage with a third company) . However, the League program has been operating well and through participation and competition has effected substantial savings for almost all cities. The Utilities Commission has not, as of this writing, received some of the information contained herein. Therefore, their decision or preference as to carrier and coverage is not yet formulated. The Utility Manager is still investigating an aspect of the utility supply failure coverage. It is antici- pated he will have some information by 6/15/82. l John K. Anderson, City Administrator June 10, 1982 Page 2 A recommendation is not presented herein as to which company coverage should be with, SPUC input is deemed important here. However, it is recommended that the policy stay with whichever company is selected for at least three years or a significant change in premium. At least one company declined to quote because we went through the process last year and the time and expense involved in quoting and administering a policy on a one year basis was not worth it. GV/ljw attachment t MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator Lou VanHout, Utilities Manager FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Liability and Property Insurance DATE: June 10, 1982 Introduction At the Utility Commission meeting on 6/7/82, there were several questions that arose regarding the liability/property insurance policy commencing 7/1/82. Background The first and most important question was about coverage for utility supply failure. Transamerica covers this in our current policy. The League did not cover this in their quote. Upon follow up, the League would cover it for about an additional $700 in premium and if SPUC would maintain their lines in accordance with OSHA standards. A second question was the limits of liability, the League at $500,000 combined single limit vs Transamerica at $300,000/300,000. The state required minimum is $300,000. The League is $500,000 per occurance except for product Liability and completed operations which is $500,000 per year. Transamerica would cover up to $300,000 per occurance ($300,000 aggregate) except for product liability and completed operations which is $300,000 per year. A third question was the deductible on explosion, collapse and under- ground liability claims. Transamerica has no deductible for this. The League quoted a $250 deductible. Otherwise, the coverage is the same. The fourth area is the situation of SPUC having one insurance company and the City another. There are numerous areas of common interest and/or exposure. It seemed the consensus of the Commission that it was desirous to have the same policy/carrier. The insurance agent felt it would be much better to have the same policy/carrier. If there were different companies for the City and for SPUC, each would probably have to name the other as additionally insured and thereby could end up being a higher total price tag. There could also be problems determining which company is responsible for a claim. Additionally, Transamerica will not carry just the Utility Commission. A fifth area of less significance is that the League has dropped the fellow employee exclusion. This means they will cover one employee suing another if it is related to City business. Transamerica will not. John K. Anderson, City Administrator Lou VanHout, Utilities Manager June 10, 1982 Page 2 If it desired to obtain umbrella coverage Transamerica offers broader umbrella coverage extending over our policies for public officials liability and police professional liability. The League umbrella would not cover these two other policies. For a $1,000,000 umbrella, Transamerica's total cost would be $1,422 higher than the League. The attached Assistant City Attorney memo dated 8/4/80 briefly addresses umbrella coverage. Additionally, issue of employees being subject to the immunity limit has arisen. It was related to me that Scott County has purchased umbrella coverage because it was determined that an employee being sued because of his duties would have only $300,000 worth of coverage and would personally bear the burden of a judgement over $300,000. An additional note of interest is that Shakopee is the only City covered by Transamerica. If Shakopee were to drop the Transamerica policy, it is not likely that Transamerica would write a policy for the City in the future. GV/ljw I a I Capesius Agency, inc YOUR INDEPENDENT INSURANCE AGENTS P.O. Box 97. First National Bank Bldg.. Shakopee, MN 55379 Tel. (612) 445-1922 CITY OF SHAKOPEE & SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION & SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY SERVICES & SHAKOPEE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY — SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA INSURANCE RENEWAL PROPOSALS — POLICY PERIOD FROM JUNE 30, 1982/1983 PROPERTY: $6, 154,782 — Blanket Real Property — Per Statement of Values — 90% Co—Insurance — $100 Deductible $ 864,827 — Blanket Personal Property — Per Statement of Values — 907 Co—Insurance $100 Deductible COVERAGE PROVIDED: "All Risk" Coverage including Theft Replacement Cost Coverage Agreed Amount Endorsement TIME ELEMENT: $20,000 — Extra Expense — City Hall $20,000 — Extra Expense — Police Dept. $30,000 — Extra Expense — Utilities Office GLASS: ACV — All Risk Coverage — Per Current Schedule — No Deductible CRIME: Broad Form Money & Securities Coverage — All Risk — No Deductible: City Hall: $5,000 Loss Inside the Premises $5,000 Loss Outside the Premises Utilities: $7,000 Loss Inside the Premises $7,000 Loss Outside the Premises CITY OF SHAKOPEE ETAL - 2 - LIABILITY: ( � ;; $300,000/300,000 Bodily Injury Limits of Liability ;; $300,000/300,000 Property Damage Limits of Liability $ 1,000 Premises Medical Payments Comprehensive General Liability Coverage Form Providing Coverage for: Premises & Operations Independent Contractors Products & Completed Operations Broad Form Property Damage Fire Legal Liability - Limited - Real Property Incidental Malpractice Liability Host Liquor Law Liability Owned & Non-Owned Watercraft Liability Employees as Additional Insureds Blanket Contractual Liability Personal Injury Liability Extended Bodily Injury • These are the limits of liability currently carried by the City cEShakopee. The League quote is for $500,000 Combined Single Limit Bodily Injury & Property Damage as they do not offer the $300/300 limits. • League quote includes a $250 Property Damage Deductible for Explosion, Collapse and Underground Liability Claims INLAND MARINE: $112,400 - Contractor' s Equipment Form - All Risk - $250 Deductible $143,942 - Miscellaneous Articles Floater - All Risk - $100 Deductible Valuable Papers & Records Coverage: $550,000 - City Hall $ 10,000 - Police Department $ 10,000 -- Utilities Office CITY OF SHAKOPEE — 3 — i1 AUTOMOBILE: * $300,000 Combined Single Limit Bodily Injury & Property Damage $ 30,000 Personal Injury Protection ;; $300,000 Uninsured Motorist * $300,000 Underinsured Motorist ACV Comprehensive $100 Deductible Collision * $300,000 BI&PD — Non—Owned & Hired Vehicles Liability — Based on Current Schedule of Vehicles * League quoted is based on $500,000 Combined Single Limit of Bodily Injury & Property Damage as they are unable to furnish your current limits of $300,000, as requested. TOTAL TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE CO. PREMIUM FOR COVERAGES SHOWN: $36,145.00 TOTAL LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST PREMIUM: $34,417.00 OPTIONAL COVERAGES: AUTOMOBILE: 1) Change to $100 Deductible Comprehensive & $250 Deductible Collision: TRANSAMERICA ANNUAL REDUCTION IN PREMIUM: $ 1156.00 LEAGUE OF MINN. CITIES REDUCTION IN PREMIUM: 2075.00 UMBRELLA POLICY: TRANSAMERICA LEAGUE $1,000,000 Limit of Liability $2678.00 * $2678.00 $3,000,000 Limit of Liability $3728.00 * $3914.00 $5,000,000 Limit of Liability $4428.00 ;; $4532.00 * Since Transamerica Insurance Company' s basic coverage is based on $300/300,000 Bodily Injury & $300/300,000 Property Damage Limits of liability, the additional premium required on the primary policies, to qualify for the Umbrella Policy, would be $1 ,422.00 CITY OF SHAKOPEE ETAL - 4 - /) /Q''/ SUMMARY & COMMENTS: 1) Premium Proposals obtained and shown are based on the New Statement of Values prepared May, 1982, and other values are currently shown in your policy. Any changes required should be reported so premium adjustments can be made. 2) The Transamerica Insurance Co. premiums shown represents ALL coverage: property, liability, automobile & umbrella policies to be written through them in ONE company. Premium proposals shown for the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust represent coverages to be written through: National Union Fire Insurance Company, Great American Insurance Company and the Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, for a total of THREE different companies. Thanking you, we are Respectfully ) CA'ESIUS AGENCY, INC. 129 So. Holmes Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 /ss 6-1-82 11A0 1982/1983 On Sale Intoxicatin: Li.uor Licenses There are no delinquent taxes for any of the applicants for renewal of licenses and the 1st one-half of the 1982 payable taxes have been paid by all applicants. Action Requested Approve the application(s) and grant an On Sale/Sunday Intoxicating Liquor License( s) to: On Sale Sunday The PUllman Club , Inc . OK 124 West 1st Avenue X OK XX Corporation 1561 East 1st Avenue X X OK Clair' s Bar, Inc . 124 South Holmes Street X OK C .R.E. Restaurant Company 1583 East First Avenue X X R. Hanover, Inc. 911 East 1st Avenue X X Table Vertigo, Inc . 101 East First Avenue X X OK Friendly Folks Club, Inc . 122 East First Avenue X X /Y 'A Y! I, . Y I Y Y L; ► ►1► A ►i 4 A • `z i ' ) U ` N U fJ N I N N N• N N 'N N - ;1- a -' - : 6 • • V I• •I •I Y N _- I ? Y A U N 1- O . 2.• . . . . ., - O: O 4 J ♦! -1 0 9 V 0 SII A Y N - O OI • V ?I Y A UI N O 1 I I 2' r ! •+ • r• • r r r • w r • rr j• r+ • * a J' ►+ • a' Q a • • N mit 0". A 1 at Il * a% a 0 0 0 at 0 S 0 0 » 0 • J • N 0 * I -1 • o • 01 ‘Ai .2I * a j• a Ca u 04.D 0 'a1. 3 . • c.) 1 * 0% • G S tO • UO • • • GI :2 oO l. * a a n^! o 01 •-, '0 r3:21G r rn N I * • c9 • G • G • N N N N N NI N N a N • N a r z 7C /�� • • • • • VI a� InI • I • .1. T 1 aT t a. • N a. a * 0+ a .r 1 2 -• 0 -< • 0 0 In J C a 04. . - o G GCC 0 0 D a. I 0 0 m m o a. m , CO CA ON 0%0%ON m at 0' -4 N I o 1 . O A . (- .". ..00 M .O M .O .fl .!7.fl .O .fl.O .O .O.A. Ut .0 O 7C I; .1 ...• ...15 I D ( ns I m - 2 co '•D 2 :D • .D al o/D Ca.• Co CD ,D C. N 1 IN N N N N N N N IV N N N r N IN N rn 1 I m 1 ) i .IO 1 0I0 I 1...4+ MO 0.4.O... NCAIN a1 UIN .0 UI UIN .O .13 NUr • • 'Na N 4)1i U1 I O '3 (4 Id os ODI ul(II P7 G.O O NI 0.G r UI UI ri..I O 0 0 d _ • • • :• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •. N N 01.0 J .1 001 at 01 '0 N110.1 V 2 0 -4 .4,4 ,0 U1 U1 UI N 00 UI UI J'3 UI UI 0 0 0 01 U0 000") ,AID N r UI O! 0 ra .1-1 N N • a, • • • i * • • • • • I at b )II IS D GC. f D ))).) DI ) a1 .. I OS CO N II9M C CCCC - N C ) r w wI 1' rO re, ) ) -• -•1-4 -U-4-1 In . 2 I- 21 0 z ZZ 0O�0010001 0 Io - In E N x I mi I A 7cl • 2 I m n r)n ct r)r) I •-I el -r fn -I n >i •I 2 rn rn 1'1 rn to OS rn ) rn w 2 o 0 I CI 1'11 -4 D. ) z 2 z Z!Z Z -4 z 2 0 C) 2 -41ni•t 0 2s_. .4 -4-4 -•-4 1 j rn -I rn e1 7 U) OS •0 0 0 2 773 2 2 2 I 0 2 2 2 • r'l1 I1 f11 2 mt1 r rrrrr a r I 0 rn rI c. o c t1 LSI 2 z N .. .. '3 N 0 01 c)I .4 • C Cc cCy S C x I -•' z •01 v $ 2I '0'0 -0v r 2 ., r -1 r rn N -1 rn I 2 V) 1.O I r1 VY mI Co -•-.1 P1 r'1 I'1 o N rAI N Nr r'1 1-4 `• -4 DI r, n 22 0 OO CCC C D DI -1 ' ) G" I ) CCC0I00'Tni '2 C C; 1n L f1 MQ 0 O C C MMA••.•I 911 17 17"a 91 a• ,- 2 r 2 ; yI q I • o Im o oDyo o a j r r r iIa 0 01 � • . rrr . . . • r~ • • I o 1 .. 0In irr+1�r r� C) 1n T aI Ism w w i21y = nvnr >tC . 1 ,.11 d. aI s i ;D 44,, n A a ►4 ..I 2 ' •l n CC ZZZZ•4 2 21 0 -.It 0 O CO CO - 1-4-4 • • I 13 m •, Zz NN • •I• • • • r 3 91 el I 11 M N I I ,.• M wI •l • VIN w!•ww M w1 0 C I 2I1 rnl • • 2 x.2 A 2 2I 1 r*1 m 1'1 rn 9 I -0 Co) MI I -p-1'0 0 I rn M •• 1 • ! • 1 I ^, NJ p .->I 4-•1 ,3 re .D00(Cl0o I I 0 0 01 ) r ca r' r rl r UI r A'• _ `• • r•i CI I 1 11 I I 1 / 1 I 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 In 1 I I n 11 a 0 1 •.1 •1 a •• .0 • •' 0 N J1 N I 0 Ni Cr G G N N N N N N N N ! N N N I C r ... I G! 0 G. .o GG G 41G Gr r r ' r G U' 1 o .O I N 0 01 0 I 10 O N NN N U.IO O O UI N N: -- I I II 11 11 1 1 I 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 11 I + IP I 2 u Ir .r •••! r. r r N •.a1•G•I• •41 r .3 I Ni N 21 I N 41C •NNrrW#GNI N IG NI O G .O I T. r ..1 r rr. (4:1•Ncn'r r r - r r•' I I I' II I' I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 11 I G a i a r r r rN • •G•1• •W ♦ IO1 G. "' ... r. N "I CO I N I ow •MNrN1• NN N 1N NI C 01 i I 1 • ! 01 ( a 'f N 1 ( I 10 ••••4, I I I • II o .n W j i I 1 I a N I 13 1 I I I N • I • ` a i ! • I I' I i a I a ! Al D. f0'1 a Is ! a I 1 I i I ,a I I I i I ! a i, `+ � I n n I 1�1 ! I I I ,ce I I s x II 411 x 71 i ><I 2 2 I r H 1 II N f 1 VI ICA N I y MI 1 ___? I _ I _ I I I 1 1 1 i.. ., .. .. . I- ? ~- ` _ _ _._ ____ a _ 'r- = Y ^' " � . 11. 41N1-• / r ( 7[T �Y U ..9' Y 41 Y l • ♦ • • • ♦ • w • •i Y U Y' > V v J U N .41:1 N N N•N N 77 _rM V 0 U • 4. + p tit P J .•I U i U' + 0,• P V } J I W t +, 0 • P I V p J. : I♦ .1. O O i 9 V P Y . U! N p l• P V P Y •'U N 1+ • I 1.1 P.P.P. •+. • r • N 6.• • 1+, • N ► N • r P.a+ • r r m * I Cr,Cr.mmI as • Qt • N • 0 * mi • as • m • mmmm * m Cl .a A • J <)6,).3.' 3 • a 0 • en • ;.3 • 1 • .7 • J.1 •.I J • O = CD c) n N 3 • 2 aO a0.0 .0 • sO • 0 • CO • Co • V • V • . V -•N •. m C) • (n In UI tl1( In * (.W • c3 • V • .. • . 0 • m * N N N N • 1• A Cl I . H J O 0 i 0 C. C1311 ml mmo. . m w m mN. m mmmm m -I v+ ca MI .n.A.n an JI 0 s .•1 an .n afl so r1 b. . .n .n.n ca •.n O NI namba ;a • ro m al J mm.n D m N NI N,31i3 N N1N N! N NI N N N N N N N N N I i I 1 X. I 0 Jr 00 r•+ C N H NN NN 00 (d N 0 F -4 -4i UN a- A a•r N a• V-4 00 00 W(,• V V m Om as .II.al UI UI N a UI•.0 UI w U1 UI ! 64*4, mm a,.. ma• • 04 m m0a.0 a0 00 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ,.Al P ,AI 0 H 0 0 JI UN 4 r3 r a+ .7(., LI..r (!• -•co m m -4 •0 a0 :-) F 4310 UI FI 4 1 ,3NN UIUI 0.-, NN V WGA V F 0.•.. P1n A!n n('fi n A n. n m a of o o co m ")1 r r r r r r 7' O O ZH i,-.;H H H )3 2,. 2. 1014. A1** 1* ZI a• 2 sin ns •4 I ( V D 2!Z 22 a• N ni N(e)Cl)0 H H (i N ' 4 r m !i(•1 2 m I 7 2 V 1ti 13 AI 70 31 A m V • CI O i(i1 • • • O O a•I 4 ....•-•a•r•I H C -• 0 2 A O 7)I 2 2!222!Z :0 PCI 1 til-•H-1-4 COr Of A . 0 CO Ii 40 2 f) H 1...,H..•awl H M C 0 CI C C C '0 _ AI 7 Z;2 Z 712Ann z P1 co 2 N CI a m m a r S (( ( 2 '1 • T S =''t a x a)! 2 I r 01 miI C a r' Cl) el -•1 • 2 • . V) m -c' .. N -I • !1 • I • A . 01 73 731 73 a MI A 70 ro C 0 • X 0 0 73 73i C V H 2 Z!2 2 2:2 • V •A 't) • Hr!H H M H M H • I 1 A I O 22'222'.2 N! 2 2 VI N CO)V) NN m m _ G7 C')1 47 C7 G'1r G) .I C) O MI A 7 AI 73 z AI 2 I N n n 1.. Cm PP a• a•a.la <1 w a• I < < <I< << A A -•. .0'O!-0 'O 4 13 01 C 9 . • I A A n1 C) C)A mo C . • • C'C C CI ml V) N V)ten rn m/1 V1(11I mm N 77i Q:t)CO. Cl) a•1 • • •,• • • • • • /• O 2 A' .0 .0 i • , • o . 0!3i n 0 a ca to c3CO-4 ml n 0.0 0 C) Is P.. P.1+1 a•P.ay P. r 41 r r r F ;•011.$1 a+a• r A I. • 1 I 1 1 11! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 A 0 e 000FjF 1 01 0 0 0I 0 NO F F 0 C) Na ca Cal(,1 W 4i C WI (4VA Lai W W W N C I t•. - UI 0 N N U)0 ••i UI N (4$ (4 a O a+ .-a• •+ 2 N. a4'3 OLa^ c, OI O O NI O O 31000 UI .4 I. 1 11 1 1 Ii 11 ! I 1 11 1 1 1i 1 1 1 1 • (,•i to Wr r, 1.r 0i UI t0 ui -V •• t4 r r r a 2 N I Co N'V c11 Idl N Ni G a+ a+i r I CO CO a0 -4 a•! N 0 r• r a*a-a•a•!rary O r N •+ o I 011.401. 44 • 1. • 1 111 1 Ii , 1 I I1 I •• I 111 1 1I I 1 c...1G W'!r a+1.•b.. 01 0 �, I all V I 0 0 NJi GI el*44 01 Ntj 04 ! . IO V rl I N •v.Or i 0 a I n N J T : a. 46 27 1 o I • j I I a ,4 22 {• 1 • I a N i I • I 1 2 1 I.1 1 .0 I I y !¢ • • I • I • •� • • ► • Cl) 0 • • • • a • • * 0' * M o .1.1 I I i i I * li I' • (^ A of I A (')1 A A n X j 7 7C x rol 7! 1 7 N V) , N N Cl) 01 ( V) i N N N 1cl, 1 `.U a u IVu • ,'...1 �+ 0fA �'• . - J � v } •:-V - o0 VPY�Y - ----% ,Th • P /J J 4I4 Y 4I4 S O ti •IG w UiM t OIO O '4I4 V '4;L. 4 0 y O G 1V 0 J 1.i N N w OIr V •!Y N► uI + C •'• .11 . U 1. Y N --*.V'------Th I I Ii • •+.r r•.!I.•I. .+ • r • r • r r mI •I. 0.1:3 a, [At a,0• O. •• m * T • 0• 0• 0 T CTI an 0•IT .T CT' O. 0• • i 0• • a% a Co 010 r ►+r rlr • r •• I r • r • • r * • a> wmrnjrotr)oclro • r * +r • 4 0 CI W 4 4 U W W 4 uj 4 W • 0 • CU..3 a •i ►'+I 0+ • • i O.71 • I I r t�a Gl n G C:r n c •. 0• • N N 7C A H 7 -• • { ! I0 " ..:,a ..tacb ..sJ .?. .J C Ce.a.] G a%)a ' C. ':. U . J '- p T 00000000 MO T Cr, -4 CA 0.1 0.0.�0. .•. `\ \ ` \ \ M 2 J\\ \\BVI a r .1 i r.L: :�Gs e- 0 Ct ,A .4%CS[A:)o..0 0 l7 O•J 4) IC ....A aCl N N - .A .O N .A.A..fl.A S.O.A NSI.rr.Ci .� ` 0 (101 Co Co ;o o CO I 'D �y Co ml CO CoV toM toM Co CD '0MM �yN m rUiN IJ NINN i.e -I N N N NNNNNN NNNN N '-I 1,1 I I I n• 7 0 • .. .414 : .O. 2 • . O•I�r -4 4..IN I as MO aHCa UI • .0 .1ul1O d a'C+N NNiUNWN N .0 4040 0.0. _ O rn r N ; • • • . . • • •'• 0. •ICA O •W* • • • • S S S W • • • • • • • • •�• • 3• •� N G • • • • • • • • • • • • •.m N r .a ir • • • • SO� � ro-JTtJ1 'Z rrm •lo+W W W 0• G N-I .. r 0 00 00 5%i r C.,10.40"0020"4 • • • • • • I X111 M aa- ar aaa as C ( G, m�ofm�Im ,."1 n CC CCCCCCCC O o.iaa.wlaa••IY• 2:1 1:1 Co ZZ222222Z 22 r VM • r 22 ZZZZZZZZ 1-+ "•j ......III -Nr NI c < _�= 2SIZ22I2 11 2771777777177 N MM M'•• . 2z . U.00 51clmmmSlIaa QO 2 NNNN;Na as M aa 0 V)NNNCONNNCNC,) n CC 0 Ata 2722 M7 1 .4, A r727�22z7 • •I m =xxxxsxx xx Co ............. I v1I N OOO OO a OOOI°O a • • C"1 .y".„...•.7.y-1 N =C LL C CC C = O 2 >a nninnxwa ..1., M IMM MMMMP1t•rMM r Z In „4.. ' .. • • 2 • r • • • • • • • • • r aO0zizOa0 .,r z • • Z2Z2122ZZ s. 7° c a 04 rn c C •. r r •" . N 1-.. 1i • CC i I ' CCCCCccc M 2 PNNNNNNNN N 4. Co 4-MHMHMMH Co - rrrr rrrr t O0 oOnIcT CCI CCCITT l7Q mv -43 -ovviu -n .to 50 a.4.4.4.4.4.4.404 0� A I�rrrrirrrirr -Ir -1-1-1--h-C 4"1-1 F QI• MMrIM - hr - D+.-. .•. rr •NM.y•-. N Z MMMMMMM 10 rO MMMmMMMM /• D -• C MDNNNINN)NN A NNNNNNNN M ~ - 4(4In \\0 \\\ M4 r NZIc O 23 406M00C N Z-/ C r•• anaS.'na3's CO -4 �• • a 1 9 .aAxCACD N 2 • '• a7 �xmmmm ,,• T 2 N • 4-4 M2-4 rri-4 P O a•n Dn'n1vnD CAI 2 mr•rMMIMMmM • N i 41y -u I 1 is• • I • 1 � m Co 000100 0a a Q0 n rro.. • .....:o.�o I d W W tr. 0.,•-% rrrrr I-%0. r r 1 a rrrrr r r r !''I rj1ti! 1 1 1 1 / 1 111 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'' 1 1 1, 1 •1 ♦ O .i1�* 4i*a O ♦ JMa O aaa aaa0O JN DJI * W NN C 40 W 4W W.W a 4- N NNNINNNINN-NN r C+,r Z .4...11-4.4...4.4..2.4 a W r H N W 4 W r r r!r 1.•F'•!r r 0 r.•6 -/ G:a O O 4 O c d0 I aN OCII0 0 000QI00 1. 1 1 1' 1 1 1' 1 1, i.eN , 11 1 1 1I 1 1 1 1 1 1! / 1 1� y �. Co v0+ 0, A.4Wrr 4 UIT r,0. CT0•10• ♦Ci1Nr N N NN,N►'WCD r P •N UO71N NNiN r W W 0 0' I 0.r • •"' ra -•1..00•N11..r r.rr rarr r'rr 1! 1 II I I 11 111 1 1! / / 11 1 I 1; 1 • 1' I G I I 1 1! 1 1I 4.00 0 I W Tr!M0•TIO• a WNr 4- 4' .4JO. OFIm4•-' ` W 4.640 N f.)NmiNNNINrH4CD 0• r•4 7 N N N N N r fYMi CoW i I i O I • I v 11 I I I • N i I I • III i I a IN I I i • i • I M I-0 N '.a I • N I I •I • I • • i •i n m M •I 11 I •I •• I I i iiiri 1 1 I 1 1 A t7I ni I ; est r1 a a ,x x I 711 7tl m H 0 I IN NI IW . �14 ?~>9TeN9� UV 'J •U U W U 1j M 0 N ....O • •V J uw 41 !••2U +OO9 - ? UwN 000 > . U vOO ] . ? . • J V O09 . J { . y - ; . • +000 V f u w N s /_ _ r� IU U :A yN y AA • • • • • A A • OI y S yVj ,TJ 4A.. '.. 41� i Y NIN N UN N N N I - - -I; -.I -1. . V C.y --- O • • V • A y N O O . V •,U • yl N O •I Y N -.�- •• • .+ -r r • r r •• • .+ • - • ...I • P. - r . ' ••' r • I • • . T • 0" I• 0,0. 0. • 0%Cr, ' • 0% * C.I • CP * 0. • 0' 0n! * 0' Cl .D 3 •. .1 • •>0 '7 • •3 47 * I..3 ►1 .i! • .,7 •.. .) • o . 1 • O 2 ID CA • N • N N N r N N • IN •I NI * N •. N * N NI • •. rn N ,..+ • .CI • ro CD A r ..I.d * I0r * CA * CA * r • u ..I * ID Cl •- * V • D csb V • r�O • V • ...I • N r r r U1 a I • t11 X A .• • z -4 J • I I tQ T I O.I Q. T 0, fT Q.O. 0. ( O% o o C. Cr, 4-4 0. 3. V N .71 la .n� n .n.n at .R.n ./s .OC. O n 0 s x en 1 n ai • ra 33 1D ..0 0 m D m a co • ro Ni N N N N N N N N N N N N N P1 . fn ••••• • I ! Ila 2 IJ C {▪1 I CT.'U NN -+ NI N I) V 1 r C A I.'Y -.I ro U I .♦a O O a s N N IN N Ni a s •''1ICo V I Cl m CA CA a 0 0 r 1+ d.4 N N CA CA r FA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I• • r1, 4.11 UIb.O I U1 C71 0'0 H .0 4 •)'.7 - ,..1U N JI(A d -.I I .•• UI' N N i ( ,3 CA a' a" u 0 0 . N N [3 0 O A - 0 0 0 r... 10 0 I I I i • H i 1.1 r• r•r r• 7R 7t R .• w 2 r -r 0 0! Ob l• 0 2 2 0 z m r'1 rn a 0 n1 n -..q 7, To a r•1 n Z z 2 AI • r Not •+ 12 a NN I C 2 0 t 2 rl N ao ro N N 12 V) • n r'1 .4 O AI C O A "1 I.. I rn -. O Z 2 s 1'1 C; 13 ro O IX 2 2 A. A N 2 N 2 2! ! G in PI N 1^I -0 O co O .4! I 'n r .. -4.4 n l • 1.4 .. 4 CI Z • 0 01 I • Inn -0I M PI w. rl Cl 0 a A 2! .,.4 = 170 7 -I 0 Cr-4 Cl ZZ P1 I.. a 0 ' a! '4.•• 2 2 R 2 0 • PI CA, ! -r a s 0 O .r n N; N co 2 2 a A I C 17C 0. C C f 10 TfM i.1 Q - 7 n "CI 9 22 X - 2 0 .0 41 r7 M K< 1 N MI IA a! a 19 N PI V 9 P► F cn PI NI n1 m 1•+ 1 rn' rn I C G O 7D A O O C O C C O -+ 71 2 Oro C O 0 C C -n C 11 C c P1 4-4. -• 01 11 M "I 11 .4 H 9 M 9 .• M Z . -•I i• • r -0 • • ro SI r 9 r . 'a •9 1• r' I .4 • • • I r • w • • O C, to ' !Z PI N N M PI At ' Z' 3.N I s PI PI 2 2 N !2 H = s 64, a at a a a Z, • r --I 2 I A w a a 1•• 2 2 - 2 2 2 i A • -1 1 n n •4 -I -1 -4 ..4 1 9 I 0' • rn Pi • • • • • -[ C! ip I NN I .. I rn' ( IS a. isf w •• w 2 I CI I A rn JO A a .s 2 s • ! 1 •7 i Pt PI P1 PI 111 PI I • • 't1 9 9 I 2 2 • • 1 I I". , 0 0 I a Col Cl ;!a O n N A I a 0 7 y9 .-. 0. r 1-4 ..1 CA r 1+ I- r .- '4! I. • in 1• 1 1 I I I I II I II I I I I 11 / 1 , n I al a a s a a a a a a a1 a ac3 i •OI W N N N 4.4(.4 N N Cu 141 NI N Cu I C . N' co I CA r CA I 'I-' CA Cr I a' a C 0 I Cu 0 0j Cu 0 0 N 0 Cu Cu -1 II ! I I I i I I i 1 I I I 17 I I 4 • I 2 01 , •-• i I CO C G^ sa►' j(A 41 CIA N O A 1I .• 1.' N N I CAI 11 Cu 0 P.1 r O N r ►+I.r N I+ r N OI V ON I, I j I I I I l 1 I II 1 ( I I II II I 5; ! 4- 10, r1. ON I%CI r I c. u! u I CA al 0,1I a 6... U1 Cu N Cu I 11+T '.I+ N. •. 1 F• FH Cu < • I CA . I r 1+ . 1 I I /Am I V1 N1 n . a I ('7. T1 I I I 01 .p 1 FII I �I N 0s I I a I I .J ! I 1 4 CA 'a 1 • • n Ii I 0 a, j ( I I I I • I x 1 1 I a of Z • rn 9 * I I• • I • •, • I • •' • '!. a rn I I I I II 1 I II 1 r0'1 Cl I n Cl Cl ell Cl if; mI Cl I Ile ,vs N.- l y H N N1 N , i y to N 1 'a _ I I e yy ..11 yy yy I� yy 1 ��314U'Y2OOi2222yN200. 4 } ViVVyO • • 4 t U•ttt ;tt $ 14,11It,l4'•�LI3.. } U,►u :Nu X00 • .• • UAyIY-O ••.• _____ �l I I . \ / x A. .. Y A J Y Y Y • • • • • • . • • • 4 W W W W W U YI y N� V ((aa N - ` 7 V 0 YI W N — O 01 O J 0I0 ♦ WI N — OI 0 0 J 0 Y •14 N �� O O 01 V O '1 • Y N — O •I O V 01'• WI N - pI O O VI O Y •I Y N • .+ !. N • N— • r • N N • 1+ • 1-• • N • • .. T 1• T • - TIT • • T * TTI • T • T 0 T • T T T T a, 0%C. * C) .O 'J • •1 • OI') • �l •. "I • 7 * J • .) • :._1 O U._3 1 O-1 • _ 07 W 10 W • tW W • W • W W * W • W * W * W WI(N W W co W * 1'1 N n • m • N • al • a s • N * N • r • O .1 a•r)a s 4 A -4 I• a • a a • O a • T T • a • r • .1 • W( (..(.4 WI IA(r • A 0 Z v -4 0 O 11 n c a a 0 :� 0 O C.' J G a 0 C C:a F D as T T as TT T T T T • CA CA -J (A -' . . .. . . .., . m x ] � r. h ..J .n, .,') 7 .+ 1 n 11.0 J CJ O 110 .41 ! .n ; s .n .n .0 sn y .n .n .n so .n .n .n.n R . I N. . N. . N. N. . . La D a AIa . .10 CO CO 9 'D at • a a:a(n CO D N 1V NfJ N NNI N N N N N N N NN In m I � I . A 2 1 j o C 2 4I(d W W Al a N a W NUI a a -1-i N N N r.' UI a rr N NTINN • N UI nsN .n UI a 1.•h.. N49 N7{ na Of a r .IN ...O .O 0.O.O W I 1 a a U{.O {AU) a .0 101.h .. ..)o •1 :!47 -41 a -DI.0 i 0 q 0 N 1 V I a s W a Co(d 13 N 00 . a00040 "OM •i * II 4 • • • • • • •I • • 7 P. 'ft1t C D 4t 2 2 r rrrr,rr C "1 -41-4 2 ell 0 0 H C) M•-•M M til M M r1 r>!111 • re;b ..-. r. C1 a >i 7 7 71 7 7 • 9 Is I fa as Z. al zAI e a x 'gxxxIxx < IX ✓ 1 I S I Cli; I A rl r O T1 T �1 T I' I" ! >i a 1 •I'QI A D DI 9 D AIA A Z A C ri Zr A Al a a M MIM M MIM M a I C a o rr nI DDI a (A 7 21 z z zi 2 2 a Z., ...( •-• 6 1-el 1 1 -11-1 M D 21 2 DI r' h H1 w G1 n 010 I r' y a I 2 ...1.. G.S. MI D NI 04 I• N a 0 d t (Ai -('. 7 • x MI n' m m I • 73, 33 0 m M y I -4 ! 70 • M C r1 m 12 1.Ia 0 '0 Pt .0 Z1 11 '0 v ^+ In --( 0 O I S o r C D p A D D DI D D -• M MNMIMM m r M C.C, 011 .-.a' •10 A11 • 1.• Z r2 zZt22 A D • 'O9 •I t• r • b -4-4-• tib-("( 1 I 1 • • I • M • .MMMMIMM O a 1,, yi • j) Cl in 2 2I 2 2 2.2 2 (q < C''2 In t > y m 2 a 011 C1 C)G)I G7 a I ; 11 (n (a Y I ID a D ►+ PI „I �. py Z t i P PI P P PI P P I D 1 I 24 Z ..4 •41 2-•. py M 2 NI ' 1/41y ' W=m .03=a 2 I I M a 00,P I 2 I •. •�. • • I• . ; 0 DI • 1 I I I 2 2 mi. Am� -i In ri 1 m t • a!•0 '0•, i 1 • • • • 1 ( i I I 1 1 p cal u O AI O 7 0 ( O r, I Ci OI 0 a a a a a ( I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f C) a 'a ala al al a at a a al a.al A a ala 0 O (9 N NI N I N (,1' N N N {(1 NI I Co C(.,•ry W W WI W W C N co W w W r, co(A N NO WI NUN UI 0 UII N 0 2 I-• a NN 01 n' NC.; O • NO • , aa aalaa I I- 4 1 I f 1 I 1 1 I 1 11 I I a co•.......1••.+ .,. r a Qua ,Io WI ( TTI r G .,' r UI 6•N Nf T' W W* W I T • Y I w N(4 co,N 1• 0 ✓ r H' W r� I r at N • li 1 1 II { 1 I' I I1 I I II I II 11 II 1 1 - . a T'a at WI QI TI 1+ CO a1 a 4•11 co r...Ir r •• r-• ,U1 (...N NI a' j N NI W N (W Y+Wl)-rl(41N•(+ I I z II G 00 CO i I I °' I •i I I = I I0 . ; I 1 Y ' auI I -0 I I I I a) I ' • II 0 101 r I I I I I • :0 I • I ! i I I I I I i . iN • z m �2 , I w a • � •1 •j • i • ' • i I y al •• I • I• I •• o 1 11 •II 1 I 1 II I1 I m a X1 a a a lel ta Iy I____ y` y y I IIA cal I_ y 1 y 1 IJ J J VIJ J J ? 0 0 0 0,0 0 0-0T":—, Y Y Y a 1 Y O Y Y� I y J S.(J IJ V W Y.. 4 N N N J N V N •.•0 O O0.Y N�k �Y • ,11.1.."3 • 11,100, •W N - 0 O O J O 'l •W.N - O 0• J O '• • J N - Q O '2 V O Y • W N . 1 3�_J 0 Y • .. ' �3 0 0 V •Y • W'N -p • /`-•��/ ... f V 4 I; ► 4 4 , 0 r Q V S 1•• a LI N t SIO 4 VI P 4 ♦ Y N VI O O ; V p u1 } Y + O • r V OI. • YI N + O • '• VI O A .Y N ' 1 1 �►+ ♦I r • �+ • 0. . • 03,03 • 0.0. • W • r0. rrr 0303 0.1rr►+10.rr 0. Io •' m • ac • m • IN I* • CAI • ml • mm! mlmma•mmmlmmmlmmm n a ') r •3 • .3 • -.1 • 3 • . 3 ♦ 71 • 4301n 7 4.3 .3•.3 II.3 J 013 .3•D 2 Co • • • * • • • r 0 • OI.0 • •I •• (.1.:41 (JI(al 41 4 4 4 414 4(IW(a 4 41 m N a •1 .( * V i• m • m • N UI *I • * m COm CO)D OIi.D D ,D WI.n os .0 v.D .0 C) a •, .a A N .• m • (• * V V • UN • m(n VI V.1 V V V V V X A H I I Z +• I j I O t 1 • I I o O 1) C c v oc n o C:. 0u .enc cc�1G C G 43C C:o43Gl n m m m m mm �m m m mmmmlmmo+cr.mmlmmmi +4 (n I\ \ N. • \\ N. r. N. \\\ \\\.\ \\\I I1 x I c c. r. .., .7.l 7 m 43 47 14, 433071 '143.3-34....1 .131 1► Ia a a so as as a a. a.n.n a.n a.n a a al at.n .n7t I\ N. \ •...,te I �\ V N. 1 n CO 9 ca m 'a E mro ,o Co m mm.7oco 9 rnmromj9CO 01 Ir ,N NI N N NN NIN N NN NNNNNNIC)NNNNNNI m m f1 s ' O r C .r . . 2 1-.11+ 4 II ', a(- r -• 0.r 0303 mm NN m .0 ro .aa N0. C)4rm .i 4 U1:lI N 0.a NA VIV 0031 VV NIN a • 2 v.U1 NN CC m mrNIr4.•04• • • • • • • I . • • • • • • • • • • • •HI • • • • • ,• • • r1r cool .:� a ._ ., co u 0.y NV 1 N N) UI CO t:d 0.D U'1 01 ,>m 4 a N ml R '>m :.a 0 C.1 00 00 O u 403 N O O ' (40. 4 a y VONIr O.01.0 Vr • •I • • • • ( • • • ♦ I s I 1 • N 0 2) A P1 T 2 221 277 !22.7222 t't L! C .. 2 2 D 0 ir C C C CI C C CIL C.CI C C C V ..1 r • o m 0 n 2 COIMm03nm2130m01m0C1 01 2 r+Ir o asl m�m^imlmmill mm < .r 71 1-,411Q I -4-.1 r,0.r r'0.r r�,0.r rnr 0.l (h 0.a 21 0 .. IAN NNail • • r�rrrrr-rlrrrrrr•I z -1 n 0 .9 21Z CI 0 0 m 0.i a s sol s• z s • 0 C .m nl C'1 mV 9 MI C- m ('11 m Al 2 N N 0.r",, . _ CI --, -I4 0 X 9 �1 Z +• Z • •1 111 NI 2 0 n D 2 •N • • 7C (0 nI O c21 Z m 9 11 2 OI 0 .4 1 m 'ti Ni N m V N a ►« �I-�-�-�-� 1-41-4.4-4-4 -44 w z c� c o cc o sr (nlmmmmmmlmmrxmmml -4 .•, 2; 2 c xs 22 V -. ,-;F•1".•91-.1...1-!rrrrrrl m �, p .. c 2 .0 .01 .. 0300mmrnmmmlmmm s -; r: I r 2 OI m 0.r v 2 z 2117 v '17 2 2I 2 2 vI 2 'v -01 .a .• I . 0.!r .«.. • 0�MI sl22212xxlxzr!zTi! o 2 1'i I 0.i I I• fM mlm (t/04f� 01000100 01000.0001 (9 ,) (/1 i y 12 ;w NN 2 »I 2122212Z21z22;22z! N I 11" I . a e) mlmmmlmmmlmmmlmmm' r a • 21 m 21 '° I2 c z1 z -a ..1 -41 -4 I a1 I 2 • I I -4 a I I T1., 1 11 ml i• c -4 • l°' I •1Col °M I'll VI 2 ! I 127 • sol UI NI In t 91 j ,• I • • > OI o G 00 0O 0 A • 334.400I000100010OOI 3. r • r. •' r 0.r01 .'N 0.4 r r r► 10.0.0 n I i1 I 1 1 1 1 11r r 01 I I II II / , , 1 i 1i1 1 III 1 I! n II .0 31 .0 1 .a •♦ 0 I �I o 4p1 NI.. .I,a .••!a• •I 0• ai 0 (J NI N I N 4 4 N NI m mi, 4 4 4 414 4 4I4 4 414 4 41 C CJI 0.1 r-. I NM 4 o r ( 1.-.0.... •.I N N NI N N NI N N NI N N N1 2 0 01 0 N O1��•.7 010 NI N W 010.r 0.10.r 0.103 r 0.'r r r' -'V . 11 1 1 11 I) 1 /1 1 1! L'Ir••14(N(41N1-.0.Irrr' 5 .• • O. N co N.4 01 r ml 434 tit 44.. N N Ni,',) 010. 4I roe, o11 Nw1 N V14 m ViN 4N. • }+ r' v I r � r!«- I ofr r' r0.! ca.0.r0.f0.rr!0.N0.10.rr. • 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 II1 I I1 I 1 1. 1l1 / 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 11 1 1, r .0 . 4 1 edj4 j Or I 6+1 I 4:141.1 •'r.0.014441Nr0.0.rrr i ! . N -0, N N N Csir I NI I -0.1 •'3 a N 0.14 N 0414 m .0.UI 4 f. 2 `_ ✓ I N I m I > I 1 r N IN a ✓ N I a, I I I I I m 'p 1 4. c !+ I I • •1 U' i I Ir I I : a• 1 I ' Co N 1 n • • I t ' I I m v N D •. * I• •I• • •I I * I I I N n •' 5 I •1 • •I • I I 0 m •' * I' a I1 II 1 I II 1 m nl n n n, n. I nI j n I I I x', 7t 1 N' W7C 2! =I I �I I 5 • N . ; I I N N I N N I m I . I I I I I I I I I I } 5 - J V ? 9 1 J4 O T 0 4,�M Y U Y Y M •V •U ► ► • a ••. J 4 f Jx414.. .f ../ 4.44.2.11.4* 4 Y U U Y•� V V V ~ `u T w 4 N y OO V• • • Y +O O i.44 ... O Y.•Y 1.3.A.....______", .J - .r -0 •'OV _�� r.� 00 v'T4 } VlOJJ . l v __L • - - • 4 t.. U q, q ♦ • • ♦ J C t: t O Y O u a U 7i 4 ' J. N i1 N N J N V N N O • a V+ g + ; U� + Q • O V�q U • U N I _ 00 1.0 •• Tw0. 0+T • T T P Ts0TPls O•NITO% O'I0T P 0• • 0. *I 00 iI 0.6 a • ' n �•-0 r ,, -I an 3 • .p) 7 .3.3 0 .a 01o.. ,Jp .:an an 7 3 r n •1 j0!•.) •1 • i 2 '.p • :A U•In UI UI! • N (A U1 N(11 N UI (n(n UII lA(A LAO(n UI (A • to •I (n N • UII • M N • NN;MN P3 • r r rrr rr r r"•+r r r • -.J •i .3 .•I • n • 0OI0 C) ) • m d-4-4.4-4\\1..\4-4 -41-4441\-.4 m UI • 1m ri 0001 •f- hl O r x n � I I v - I o '.< { • O L.1 •n c:c.a..: .Jc.: .- CA oca(,C uaI u .,Iv..) m•.c 47 C. me c D 0010001 0 0• 0A T 0. CA 0•P 0•m 0%0.0+ONa•O. 0S 0% 2 0. 0• J. -4 'N ▪ .)i O .)O iu/ l •1 r).1 C•t.C el P. '7 r u.) )m (J ) G s.4).nss .) )o.A.n.as.n .as.ns.ns.n.n.0s s .n I .) .,614) s x y\\ *4I�\\1\ \ \ \m Ca (D 10 m m 11 (a' \I% ' .o .D ni.D.a m MI O)'1)0 a)m OM I:a.0 a 1D)(0 (a I 'V N NI N N NI .0 m N N N N N N Is)(4 N N N NIN N NIN N N N N NIN 4Vl )'1 9 I W c M T N r 0+04 U1 r N N W r N N -4 !O10+0+, r W w(4 mo 4%.)-4 UI O)N N.a .0 r a►1 R 0 0 00 w W r'i,r r r m m1 .n W d D d(,11 O G r a h U 1 r 1 N r T N r s N d S r 0 O tl CO 113 411',p d 4$4 N N NM )U1 UI , •.3.. m C) u.-)r1 N -1 dI.a m NI N .i(Ddu "C,4 00 .al.D 0(DI r .4..01 04)C. C) ) 3 .40c or MO N COLA d OI w um R.0 Oa W u r".P. O.EN UI C)0I 1 • -,r • I . * •• •• •I • * I• (A N N N Ni an 0 (ACA(ANN NNN VlN(A 00 N N N N0 N +.++ ++! I -4 V M' 11.'D - m 9 DI Ti V �i U -n 'O .0 2 212 2 D n' a • D' • CeCrr'CCCe-CC'rrG'C r a I n e 164 TN. 3X/333 nninnnnnnnnninnnnn .. 3 ,x xix I l )c z x 7C x1 mI i 2 I -I 0 Ol O 0GI- (!)toN V)Nl 21 N N m renin r1 I z n n n n ni 2 1 -. M MIM rO .nM 0 I n ' mmm mM:' 0 "0 C r'r I A l • D 1+D D D. IA D 22222 - .. it X12 1 .2 r.r....P.r.' ! T 2 z 11- Mal rn ;, 2222! I n n n M rim n 000001 N • • < 1" • 17<11 .. T 1 A-I M iMD C o r N o• (n . In C aW tam 2 maMNC'CCCCCC,CCCC m - N a JH 1� •-I -rrr - 3 MMan 161.4'.'. - -4 -1-111a 3 C I3 • CC C -4 • 00000 I n - -r 02•.i•r r.►y 1•.r.1.#w•..rtr0 0 71 r Z)D i C M 000 .1,0! -11 y •.r•nI o r'r r r r r r'r r M r -11 ( '4 11 12 TAM •.• 3 • • • • • i • 11• C.rU r 1.41.11 M P.NIM -4 D..r• • r 11 r"1/. 21 tttt 11 I r-ii.....-111-4...611 1 r• rr •'+I N I • O 22223: N pa(0r.1 r.4r•r-41r••rrrrN I N M 12 MM M D D D R D, M +I-4M Mt M M rM M M MI M M M)M M I M N p W N MI H ..4 r.r M r. 3 S S 3 P Ni N N V)I N N NI N N NI N M 3 D n 2222z. . m'. LI C I P I ri X . A •'•n M'MMMMMM'MMrMMr r.. t • • • • • . n 'nor'rrrrrr'rrrrn I n { 1 -J M n n M 2 M'M M M'M M MI M M rY MM I M Ic •. ! -. N P P P P. 0) m o N til n,n n n n n ni n n n n(A N 10 r. 1 r r • -N-/1-ii.....1.4-4-.....s • PI O � aaaAz rr •. I. . .1. . . i. . .1. I I 2 M M M M M • •� I I I I M 'DM22D • • • • • ' i i I 1 •! • • o r•,) n c m ml d o n. n 0 0 0l o 0 of o o I ca n o al O 0. •-• r...0(40++0+ I r r r *Al+ f+. (1 ► Ill ( 1 • I 1 li 1 1 lit 1 II 1 1 111 1 1' 11 I 1 1 I li 1 I 1! n o p o o R' A 4.404.4. 4w04.R{R o RI.... R I 0 R I RIA #i O N N N N N4! • LA .a.a W W W'W W(W W Wl W W(i4 W W •9 N 141'W NIN NI C W LALAu W i r W L.P..0 ..4I.1 d •••11 d d .4 d d.I y r r r I , r'!r 1.•U i 2 .D..o 0C o 0000000000000000 o o IC I 00 N +. 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 li 1 1 I' 1 1 II 11 I1 1 I I'. I I - I I II it 1 1! -Purr)... u I .a.Q' 4 R q..0. 0•0.'.R R W.u(•-r d I N u it N r Q1 m m. r 1 r 4.♦r N N N N rN N N'v N r 0r a N N r W I N'N N' n r•"'R Nr' .rrpp;Ul N•'••Vr4-4-'. rr 1 P. m it NO" r • ' ) 1 I it 1 I 1', 11 11 1 1 1' 1 I I: 11 I I i I II 1 I. M Wrrr. LA .4).D)V R1W0' 0• 0•'RR W'W(94- +d N W r 0.14 LA' ' _ Nr(T( r r i-•OA N N'N N r;NN UI,Nr Mm N N r 'w NN N' ./. K • LA N )'. (.. I r s ra 1 1 I { I r I 1 a"1 Q. i 1 I 'V 1 r I I i a N . I I 1 1 1 • • . I M V I • • 1• •1 •I 4 I Cl) GI ' • I • I • - •i • • I D M • • I I I• •, •I • a) 1 I I I I I I I II 11 1 1 I m n n I In I n1 nI ! n N N ( N N1 NI I N +d I ' J qgi-''Jl U q J ♦ 1 • • . . . . . '11 iiVN `Y • UNOOi ! NYiiN O OOV 0 • > . N + CO . V S ') •V N + O VT . y ♦ .UJ . - y . 7 •. V -p • i-` l_ U J __ / 71F 4 + •' .---, I • i 1 • V0tl. YN8OOV • U ♦ UINtSO1 :: yrIW NYO • OI • _j0 _ •I; _ _! _ . ; • • . . Y . . N ^ I • • r • rr-r • 1 r rp� . 1 . r • r • r • r rr r .• ... •• • I T ' • TTTT * T T I 0•I * T * �T • Cr, * 0• (n TT TT A .O • 7 1• ') ..)J . * O J aai O * O * a • •7 • .0 .-.. :).7 '3 J 1 CO • N 1 • N N UI N I N vq N • N * N • • N 000 N Cl) m N • .(1 • N'0.O.O I N1 �11I1 d 11. 46 • ♦ • 4(111 • N . .. N N f • T I• Wwr•w 11. a T • w • 0 • r • N TTT U1(• x n .-• I 2 -4 0 s I • • o 4:3 1 10 OG.J U 0 m .) G G C. c. J 0 G ))4 0TTTIT • Cr) T T T T 01 TTT TT -4 y Io 1� .44. - , - 'N.,144 -.- m 2 n •.ra c G: n •, r o c .0 n n o m I.(1.(1 mi.G so .) .O .n .0 .O 0041 N.I1 x N. N %N.N. N. N. " - N. -S\ - -S 4 n 0 ;m 1 m m ID .o . m m .» m A m fb m MM 1 N 1 fN NN N N N N N N N NNN NN 1.1 m i 2o r r r C • • • • Z i 0 N O. . r rl 00 041 • 1A A . 0050 t� U AA N NI W W W w NN A rN or 'dr rlrr IN A NN OO W W NN NN to as co NCf, N•• CO WUI • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .. N UI •DI d:O.. N W N N ,2c:0 00 /40 .OI D G 00 02 -7402.J • • • f/lN • NIaNNI() ..1 on 00 JG. A0 MJ 0 .041 NANO O•J ' I C. C co G1 y1 co Uf U)y Cl)m ¢ I!6<IC r, as ala • zf • A r 2I c C.CC cc x Ir r r r I • ri • 0 O • • 2 T m ri m e .. 1r-rrl.r- Al p rr`r ac t z m m rnl m M 0I 1"11 0 A '.4 .4.41.4 • •I 73! 2 r a "L% a m C)m m CO m _; r ml I s c c'c ss z y 'w.1.ri.• • Vf U m1 m y yI y 2 2 O -• IT 22'2 ~ A •.•n•. n • f7 O O OI lJ o� Ci Z1 ••w OI M ZZ A MM x m • • •,• r•C z' al 3 O • 1•r f7 m m m z Z C) r I '1M I-I yl A I -I r A U1 O U) 00 2 'b 21'C1 TI •I •••I -4 0 1 ONO • • Cl t '0MI"0 ( 0 -II $ 000 X sawn T., ml I CCCA H—s.< m 22C11Z'1 • 0 . 13 .G• C 19 2 S I 0 m i 13 y 13 m�M1 y woo m•O .4 -• !mocha 2, OI e•• C 70 A74 C CCC M2* -• r ssooT ml �i y1 -n I T .C• 'a0 M9I9 '011'oiI 2 r !room .1 o r rr,r • • • a A,r •I • 1 al rI 1.. .1• m m m y y m < y C C:N f•W =I y m m A•1 {y y yI y m m y 01 m! l 72 a; I 77 72 • a1 2720 72 0 m ON •'• 21 P1 A -41 el rn m m v m1 • I m l m y •I :N to ••• r/) y a 0 AI I Z 2 731 I AI ml rnt • 1 I o oda O.r a _ ..,ra ni O cli t7i O O N O r�.1 I r. f7 r 1-.4-.4...0. ( F"• r 1 c• I I 1 1 1 .. • / n • • 1 1. 1 1i. II 1 • 40 a46,• .•♦ o N• •W ANN WI Ai A A A A • N N NfN W W C N W N N'iN NI W N • w W NI t w m N N f r •6.y c...1 N I 4•41 r r N1 O 0010 O o 1 1 N I i O d nal d OI d 11 '', 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 i { 1 1! 1 11 11 li 1I o 00(.00 •0! Wi 4i �i N �I N 4N l W 00610. �N.1: 2 0 'N N r.N G.I r: F11 rl, 0 i I N •441 N r r1 G (Nr•r 0 r rTr�r W Ni rl r! A r M 1 1 1 i 1 11 1 1 1 ► 1, 1 •I 1; •I /1 1 1 11 A A A(di A W W. W AI A N W W F W r AA .• in .NNr,N TI r r1 r r IN r, r NrlW Irr C • i W ! •+ N o .6 1 i • 1 LoI I t ; a N I II m I . . l v, c) • • • • • •I ; . I m 1 I•I J 1 1 { 1 1'1 . In A ! Pf j� �I 7c I V Vi I W IA' CA y m X 1y y I I _ I • i IJ V' JJ •f ?UPJ ?50.+} • --- r --i. • • •�• UUUU • UUY NVNN Vvv N1N O4VOY�I.Y _ U • ,... .. -. 0 . O V O U N .- G • 9 V • Y •U•N .. O 034 0 . ♦N D L J ) } �t.. r.V t J • 'J . . J • • V 0 4I . Y N O �`� + 1 4 � .�_ • 11 ! II I •IG4 UI • W Ylu Y 0I3 V• •'• ♦ W•IN • ♦IU J W U > W W 1W .'W N NIN S NS N N N 4O OIP V PIY a WN : O • • VIP 4 • .r f � F• I6. IF• .•1•• • r«• N 1+ .. F• F• a 19. .i .F• • F• • 19 u 0% la" o a a T co co a • 0' O' 0' • 01 a1 0`c' * 0'I * a n •.0 I� OD IOJ CO CO • 0D(D co !0 O) m sD • 01 • TI 0' •I 0• • 0' r') 'N • •.� V ti + 7 �1 O • N • UI UI • N • N C) !:Co I' ICD V r • UI UI • 111 I N 1+ P • N • 4.4 Cr • A * '3 A 'en I I I I I 2 O < I • I I I Q �' I.. I C.� O t.:. C) 4 G 0 J GG U: c: C7 s T IQs 'co 'O' a1 Os 0'0' 01 coa• co O' I0, C'01 T O' -• y I. • \ \ \ \.1 \ \ f1 T. IM ,j u '_ n C. .0 ,y ..� e. o 7 ..1 1. r) X \ i., :\ \ \ \' ' \ \ \ . \ I ft.) tiaN !(0 (D ID (O CO CO 'D i0 .D m CO 5 a ;b b I-0 IN NN N N N N N N N N N N N i N) n • 1 im i IP f 2 • 0 1I r N C • • + 0.. + C hal •'• 1.4.1.-. AI• 1.U41 N 1i' N 4 0w 0' I UI U1 1.1+ d N W d O a .4 01 1+ r.r •a•t7 aa. U1i(11 a 401 oN 00 o• O0 NN 00 d. -4(w G NN 01 O' ' • • • • • '• •I• • • • • • • • .• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ` • .') .•i u 40 J N .r U) .I d 1 ) C. OD m N N 0 0 N UI .0 D Os ;r a. • • a'.' •)'•. ,,I.) UIU) J - O O NN .O O OD(D 4141 Q O - J O c3 0. T 17O • • U :S '2Cf Cf 11 T C) C) 4 D '' N NN C C r' b . 1 2 2 .r.. C a C 2 N .r. (.1 11 s .-. ! . 2 Tel 0CD PP N C) • PI 11 T A. 1- n C) A ;(A VI N N 1 2 1• -C ' 0 0'1 s 0 N N 1 1 C) 2 1 C n r 1 1 r 0 < .0 I O m 2 1 • 111 TT ID X I 11 I '2 C -,1-1 2 2 >• r • = 2 0 Cf 11 '-( Cl (7 O A • 1 r co (n C+) • • C 2 O P I C C '4 1 H • - 4 ••• y b /Y 1'1 2 r r \\ 02D 2 n 2 O C0 /_- rl A C) > \\ 31 2 0 ., • • 2 2 N C) CD C) 2 2 N D )M C) 2 r1 C n rn Ai r-r- 2 • ,•, 2 n r, 2 \ AI; N N n I 2 0 2 LI 2 2 • • • C) O • • co• •S . C • 2 < 1i • 431m • .4 • ' N H M Cl O Cl)• .f1 N 2 M ((0 11 (N N 0 12 010 f1 (4 1.4 z o c C) ;co C s 2 C 2 C C C C r�c C G -4 '7 V) •C• C))'TL ,-Ci T X C N O �C-1 0 .4 r11 'A 1 � v 'n 1 rn 2 = v o ;ror 22 0 I • r r 2 • Ir a r • w r II V) r1 I C)U) 1n•1 V) rC) r1 °• • 2I f 1 • C~i r0) 2 VI 2 N a 1 I (1 N N N 2 DIN 2 co I co r. C 10 r•. 0) 2 ' 2 C . H.1 s C) .r --a ('12 0 < I (D N zI H 2 1 U) r) 2 I -4• s-s ! (/) 2 -41 2 .•9 ...1...1rl 1 1 2 • I f7 1 • 1 • N PS 5-. 22 11 a• T m Vim) F.* • � 11 2 2 w hi 0 r1 1 -( 2 l z A 2 co)N • ,T (1 A (1 r) I (1 2 (1 2 ,2 • 2 • I I l I 1 • ^ ,, 7.3..Z I l• 0 0 u a o 0 o 70 0 o a . 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 I ' ' r r r F+ r 1+ n 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 C) .0 • A A a ,•a a a a • a a ala • • o N (.o (5 N N 0 O. N u N N 4 N NI N N N C LA .0 s.4 a F' .F-P r F+ r N 'O 4 L410.• 4 r 2 N r co N 0 •N b' 'U I O O 04 114 0. 1 0 1 1 II I I 0 •-•1 I 1 1 1 i 1 1 I 1 N .- (.4 r4. ;.O 4) • a 1 w r • r I• cni r 4 .0 1 2 N lD a N N N) I F+ 4 I a. H N Ni CO I 1-1 N I 0 1 CI a 1A1.. I I I I O i 1 • a. 11 101 �) • . r) F-• (. .0.D a • N • N • 0'11- 4I I '0 I ••• ca A I.•'D. N F+ F- N) I N I N NI(D 1✓1 F+ 7 I 1 IC C/ I p I it I r • I I N • I 1 I UI I94 � a O N a 0` .1 4-a i I i 'O 1 • o 1 I I I O .p • 1 m j I ( I I A N ' I I y > I r, ,� I ! I I . rI * N GI 1 I I I • • • a A If1 t 1I I 1 1 P11 1 Ix es I 1D' I . I I • ! IN IN 01 Iat N I .O I I w' . i' 0 0 N.a`,u 1.4'44 J u Y u v . _i--I--- 1 I r. '' • i .1-• 7 . ..P - 0 0 P v ' . • O •P J ',.V - 7 0 1 V ) • Y J V “ ?�1 4 ' U \ •N• P V U • V N O O O 0._.. ....° v) Y.•W�� - r ___ ___ _ . t14,' .,u of ç, Th 111 P 41 4 4 N u Q 4 S y VA i 4 4-4 1 v O yrQCT 414 N +1 p V O J O V I : Y 4.4 O • O . •I J a 4I N - O I• 0 J' a 4 •'. . -. r r r 04 r 10 10 r 10 1/40. r 04 0+ r r r M N r 10 r Qt T I T T T T T 01 T TIT a 0 0 T T 0 T T T 0 `D .1 :3 0 0 9 A •• 0 1 3 cIl u 42 el A J o J '3 0 J CD CO 0 CO co as co CD co 90 (D CD COI CO OS m al CO m 020 CO CD OD m N N j N N N N N N N N N r r r r r r r r r • 10 r C) . 03 .4 T (A 1 (.4 N 10 0 . tC`C CO CD r T CO 0 W N r X A -4 Z .a o jn t• +:.1 O C ,zr10 G .:.r G . C: Ct C. U J C tr o t.. D. T I T I T T T i T T T T T D. T T T T Q` T T T T -041 0 \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ • \ rn 2 :J n 0 A 0 1 n .O J C.G C*O - G 0 0 U Q O 1 .0 M 0 so W .1) tC .0 `D.o d•.o to.0 .n so s .n al .o .O X \ \ \ \ \ r \ r N.\ \ \\ \ • \ .0 44 \ \ \ 0 CD Ial0 CO CO CD CO CO 0 D ID(D OD CD CO CD no m0 ID (D wo PJ N N (r N N 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N . N N IV 1 • s 3 r r {I I to`) C 2 (D tb NN NN TT NN NN -4 O !NN .T CN NN C4 CA 0410 0.04 W 04 0. W040. 04 0. NN A ' s(R NN •.•0. NN •1 .L d 'T T .0.O V O to tO N N C m N T T CD CO N'Q•T - -4 r r ♦ 0 N N r•- IN 0 ..o 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a 1• • • • • • • • !• • • • I cn v1 u+ a C.1 N !v i;,0 CJ d.a ..W 64i CA O .4 W W (A s u W as CO I r r .a .n .a.n •0 0 •• ,r1 Cl ,0 00 NN • -J 6300 .3I 3•0 Oulu) o O .JtoN 0 3 .0.0 NN 00- W W NN 04• • • •• • • • . • * • • * • • • * • -0 • i I i t>, z . 11 I 2 r I '2 C- M z s s 1 C-C. s A r .• .r el s T. Ih • m i JD I o . 0 s s .• o 0 C P' 0 2 • s .• 70 e T ! w In 2 -4 70 70I CI A N to Z In 2 -4 Cr r A JO ' r• • I • 2 n 2 A .4 s X� IS m m • -• to \ • r X < w N .4 4-4 m D'1s 0'O O m n 1 -4 C 1,i A 1 S .. (n o n 2 Zrq m T. S ' r 0 • 1-4 m N • 001 I s z (n r m mo o r s z n z s r -( -4 2 JD n 0 -4 • s JD X I s 2 • w X T •A C 00 CI - z w 2 0 ' -•.4 s s s s n 1 z m \ rn f , .1 G"r • Fl Z C r. w N N m'm z N O I 7C 37 T r O = JC > ! >D i ••• 2 m X A 7C1 7C T 2 .• 0 0 m Y+ \ r s • w r r• .4 m m A N. M >o I ci 0 s n ( 0404 I o I \ n r, (n I s 14 I r r r m 0 J[ n C ! • r i s -n to 2 1 Cl) m I -n I co I T 73 cn m .O 0 ! • 0 2 • • i C • • • ' 0404 -4 CD i i I 1 . XI 'Ti (1) A I 0 '9 I m 1 JD m 0 0 JDI A I'v 13 13 7o mo 0 7o Jo r•+ ! r 1 0 m 0 70- A el C XI z Ti O C c m m -1 A C -n m 0 1 C I T 1 C 0 O TIT 0 O O T I C m In T T m -n '9 I. (n 0 I 04 1 C i •-• T T1 C C 't7 sit /1 i C r- N N C C 2 • r -+ 1 • I '0 I z "0 I • • 2 •I . • z 17 2 z _ Q 0 • 1• w 0 , 0 O n • w • I o I • o \ \ ! Cl N ('1 r I 3 •1 I \ N rn V\ INN N • \ 04'1 v( I Cl) n 2 i r I = m ml (*N m I m m ('1 I T i - CO CO CO , G7 � N xi .J C .. D I r. i 70 r.i r ,z1>D z s• s c c rn I Y A C 1 ! W - 2 n 1 C 1C C I P3 RI 1 0404' A!C1 Int 0404 r.• CD 2 4 23 0.4I N N m m '33 t 0 .t T N 1 •• 2 m I 2I r~ -M-i IAA A > � h n 70, i V n 0 o I • A • m m \I\ m m. m 0 • 2 V ( O -'1 /.4 w 211 3 w 17 -4 C . -1 0 z . rn • m Ic= 2 • • z T m m •u we m -, • 17 1 I •0i-4 ;� IA • • I • I • • ,. N r.• .- 04 I Cl O n o CD'2 I O Cl C] 43 O O .3 .1 0 r r r r W►� l r r r r r r ►• ►- r i n 1 I I LA I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $ I I I I I I I o A t. u 1 O 0 r N W CA -41►' j CA tit CA -t N CA W U1 1 .1 C ; LA i C5 (.• (" r • W 1 N N• r Cr r r +I W r r r+ (A CA .0 `0 CA I CA 2 1 Cr r r .0 (•+ "J 0 O1 . 0 0 o r N r 1 r 0. 1 `I r U N .0 N CI I I I • I 1 I I I 1 I 11 /1 1 l 1 I - I I I I 4 I• o 2 I r 041 01 co r r r t= Ot � W r r .j- U1 r r N I o W OI C) I o 0 P. tT ' r co N o I N r tat 0 (D 0) W '1 W W N CI • •+ 4+ .0 r r 0. v i •+ N 101 •i1 V �.N r r h r r r t:• 1 1 a 1 1 1 I I 1 11 II I ' I I I I I 1 I I I .+ N A r • r A rl W 04041 (31 0 1 r r r 0 T CA r e• O i 04 P. (P r- .n CD N .0 N 40 311 '"I o I CO co CA I 4 N CA N o C < ►► I r •I o • • n • !. 0 I•. r VI o m N SpI 01 a s T t�11 I I I CA 43 ci ( • 10 fO t 1.1 Mk N• y 0 0 CI I s m I o I I ! 1 I m r I I 1 to VVVVV -�7. • 4N +Or•-•_Ut• S O MV 4 U ••,w iu . . . 4yy44 Ny •I N' N � • •-•O •+J• 4'•_ .� a I 00 ...-1.' V- ]� J ...... +. r _ - -- - --.- -.- -.. _.-- - t -„ -' ..--, :..^.o-�.... .... .-� -. .„ • •1 : 1.1 Y y Y M p ♦ • 1 •1 Y • y N - 0 yy U V yy Vy y• N y, U N O N n Ni N N N = V O I O V • y I N p •O •O V I•• •Y •• Y •N �r • F+ I M ITI OSI �T a' a' O• ON CI • J O .0 la a 3 _ D * MI 9 I m 1 31 OS .T P1 'NJ • W W i W W • �W. N a * 0 I (.1 N -•• ..) .O R a a I-t 0 -< • O 0 71 01 0 Cr) 01 0 01 01 1 N ••4 rn I 0 Cf O a 0 O c. b .O 0 0 s N .O '.0 M 7C J� '% � - -• O m 'D m CD CO C 0 N N N N N N 1 9 r I* 0 IT 01 N N 0 i O O V'0.1 M W 0 to G • N Oi 2 0 00N0 JN ONr .IW r• Q10N rr 1.•W W W cau cc. �• N •r cal.I 0.19 CD N NI J .1 A W 001 01 01 J(J N .L.d .. 0. G W O) • • • • • •i• • • • • • • • • • • • • •I• • • • • • • • • • OD -4Nld s.gUIN VINO Nr a+c.. NN 0 0 ...4.4 uv ..4'. 0P 5.. N ,Ca 01000N 0 0 a 0 - NN 00! 00 O 0 W G 00 10 MI 37 31 • * .• • • * • •I • • C 2 'A -• N In T Tl ft 11 11 11 1t'Nit 11 11 1) o 0 i ~•II 1 c CC'CCCCCCCC CC 11 RI -4 ) Z -i 22I22zZZZi22Z22 I N In < I- oofoaaoaaaaono nit s4 -(I-4 n 2 P4 CDCDfD.I0uU10 WNrr0 .. ' Z, r=n 1 IZ 0 0 010.1.1.0M .JI4(4(4.I N r A ( 1••1 'N ) A 0 -4-4$44 -4-444-4-4 -4-0 ) r m < 11 a 7C A a 0000 OOOIO0000 ZI2 ) ) A 2 -4444-4-4-4414-4444 0-4! 01 0 N a PI s *l) ) ss *11•lrrs 'C•1 1) IN A a rrrrl-Irrrrrrrr s ;0 2 I1, • x n• 0 • ,0 I ly 77r c a A a 0 xs 0 Pt1 r, r f z rn o c r, NI a c 10 of 1t .. z I ( • 1 I 0r I0v f ! I I gel r I W w I. 31 N • 0 11 ! )) NI r {P N fn 1 Z I N I .Z ) 1-6 CI e• C � a ZS �) 1 1 m < v, OC in IW I.. !z n a s •o a (� -i 9 , :Df 2!N PI Z a i• I .4 i i MI 40221 11• ' • J 1.4 I I 2 j i I TI • • • aD P1 i •I M • 1 . a r ►1.yy a a a o ca 3a• 1 I fl II ii0 }1 1 1 1 a i I I0 a 0 • j 0 Ni G' WW1 (04 W W N . C W) 01 SOI u 1 u) .O r G Z — 010 U r 0 N I i III I j 1' 1 11 I 1 I r LAW r 0 5Co NI ,D1 N1 N N •• 0 N 0 I 1 1 1 11 i I i WI r. WI W 'r 0 Ir W NI sn. NI N N 1+ 10 N 2▪ f c ' N � at0 N 1 -0 11 1 I I f I ! I 0• ,W, • is roe j ! i 1 . s IN rt +I i D m jl m u�4 • I I' i I 1 _ I 44 J VVV V 4'04 d 41 4 4 1 10 4 Y YVY l Y YY O ♦ Yvf • ; ♦ ♦ ♦ O_w U}UU U- yyp iU •++ 20 0 •Jd d. Y.N-, �—J1 • CO CO CO Co CO Co v J 0 0 1-' .A CO H H H H H H H H H H �1 H' H� L • . . a1 4, 4 4, .A .1, A .A A -A A GJ CO A (07 CO c0 CO CO CO (0 A A W CD CO Co CO a N N (A.) N N N I-' I-' N H N H N Cd G.) �l H �7 H 0 N H 0 H 0 H 01 y Lt (0 CO CO CO (0 CO C0 (0 H (a) 0 0 CO a a H H H H H H H H W H 0 0 I H 0 3H H H H H H H H H H 0 0 F� (om) H H H �7 H 0 . . • • • 0 1111 I c-r CO (0 CO CO (0 CD C0 (0 H W 0 0 CO b U) '10 C) c Q) H H H H H H H H 0.) H 0 0 H '-1 Q;, ¢) D HA (D H Q) ( cC PVC m OQ (D • (D R O 'S 'T1 t1 '1 Cr OD OD OD CO OD CO J -) 0 0 F-' A OD . F-' C .O Q) c< H H H H H H H H H H �1 H H' H '11 C H . . . • • . . • • . . • • H o a'» C H' h-' H H H-' H H H H H H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'S a • C• C H' H' - H' H H H H H H' H' H I-' C P0 0. a n 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 n et Cl) H 0 ~' OD • . C CA) 01 N 01 J J H A 01 H. .• .. .• • (0 �) N �1 �l Co 0) OD N 01 0 CO 0 U1 OQ A A Co Co 4 N Co JP H 0 0 F--' 0 F-' O G.) 0 0 C0 0 �1 H A 0 0 N.) 0 H' 00 H 0 0 A 0) CO O1 A 0 0 U) 0 -.1 O 0 0 0 -1 0) 0 u) 0 0 0 0 01 H ift .63 co N A CO N OD .A H �1 Z1 :U 'd 7:1 PO Z1 O '0 a - to Z1 Z to cD CD Q) (D CD CD cD C 0 Q) p.) (D (D a CO - 00c0U1 B B B B B m i cn '0 H R B H A -.4U1 0 H 0 H. H. '5 H. HA I-'• (D 1 h H. (D C H. 0 N U1 p N O cr et O cr et cr II (D Q) cr 'S ci H-' I I I < O MI Q) C) ao co (0 0 co 0 'U t7 H- C) U) T1 CD ct CD HA H. CO 0 01U1000 Z H) U) H) 1-3 F-3 C) C tT1 c< (l) C '0 rn 0 b 0 cD C) H. C] A) Imo• 1 (// 'S 7d O O 0 C) `O 0 H Cn 7C B GQ B H. B `CI cr '0 cn '0 c, Q) CD () r • . (.0 '- 'S H. CM c-t cr I-5 (D cC CD Cl) '0 H H C) H Z C < C) CO CO tri Co fn Cl) 0 Cr) (D • Q) 0 C Q) 3 B 'S • 1-' B x CX r Z • Z o 0 • (D Z 1--, d ci CD 0 C 0 b c) CD 7J H) (D - H) H) - Q) CD H Z 0 H • H' : Cr) rt 0 C' C r H I Z1 I ci B a H H. • Cn CD (D C/) (D Q) C H. et '-4 m 0 C Cr) cr) C) 'S CD • A) B. CD Q) cr cr cC T. T X (D 'S C/) CD o • C o 'S H. Q) H- '° cD 'v Q) H) a (D (D H (D Cl) CD (C R Co A CA) Ul N O) CO J H A U1 - - n CO -. N - -) co O) 0 Ul 0 CO 0 U1 7v -A A CA) G.) A N OD U1 0 0 H 0 F-' 0 ) 0 0 0 0 -) 01 0 0 N O H ay H 00 H' O O .A rn CO CO 0 0 (1 0 • 0 0 0 0 -.1 0) LP 0 0 . 0 0 01 n (0 CO CO (0 CO CO (0 (.0 (0 CO CO cC) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) • A .A .A .A .A .A .A A .A (.) GJ O.) Co �7 0) 01 - CO N H 0 CO OD v 0 RECEIVED SHAKOPEE AREA 12-1) JUN 71982 jice, i i CITY Of SHAKOPEE P.O. BOX NO. 203❑ SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 ❑ (612) 445-1660 June 7, 1982 Honorable City Council City of Shakopee Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: Use of the Rodeo Arena August 7-8, 1982 Dear Sirs: The Shakopee Area Chamber of Commerce requests the use of the Rodeo Arena on August 7-8, 1982 for the purpose of sponsoring a Rodeo. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely yours, Carol Sloan Office Manager Action Requested Authorize the Shakopee Area Chamber of Commerce to use the Pat Thielen Rodeo Arena on August 7 and 8 , 1982 , conditioned upon compliance of the provisions of Resolution No. 1910. CJS:cs f a' RESOLUTION NO. 1910 A RESOLUTION SETTING FEES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RENTAL OF PAT THIELEN RODEO ARENA BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. The fee for rental of the Pat Thielen Rodeo Arena (for a period not to exceed seven consecutive days) shall be as follows: a. Non-profit organizations within cor-$ 00.00 porate limits of City of Shakopee b. Other non-profit organizations 200.00 or 15% of gross ticket sales, whichever is greater c. Profit making organizations 200.00 or 15% of gross ticket sales, whichever is greater 2. The Rentor shall provide insurance coverage as follows: a. Public liability insurance with coverages of at least $100,000.00 for any one person and $500,000.00 for any accident or occurrence and file with the City a policy or certificate thereof by the insurance carrier showing that such coverage is in force during the period for which the arena is being rented. Such policy or certificate shall contain a provision that the City will be notified in writing at least ten (10) days in advance of any intention to cancel said coverage and shall name the City of Shakopee as an additional insured. b. Products liability insurance if any food or drink is served upon the premises and the policy or a certificate thereof by the insur- ance carrier showing that such coverage is in force during the period for which the arena is being rented and it shall be filed with the City. Such policy shall contain a provision that the City will be notified in writing at least ten (10) days in advance of any intention to cancel said coverage and shall name the City of Shakopee as an additional insured. 3. Restroom facilities (satelites) shall be provided at the ratio of one per one-hundred occupancy load or one per 1,000 square feet of assembly area. 4. Rentor shall be responsible for rubbish removal necessitated as a result of rentor's occupying premises and rentor shall leave the premises in the same condition as it was prior to its being occupied. 5. Rentor shall be responsible for any other direct costs to the City as a result of renting the premises. Adopted in a ' • session of t e ity ouncil of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this ,S day of k21 , 198 . ://"(1:;- a of the City of Sha opee ATTEST: Oir7/ C�y Clerk A< • Approved as to form this day of Se�/e,,�r 981 . City A torney MEMO TO: John Anderson City Administrator FROM: Jane Wostrel Engineering Secretary RE: Renaming of County Road 83 DATE : June 8 , 1982 Introduction : The Engineering Department is currently working on addressing properties in conjunction with the 911 Telephone Emergency System. Background : On January 25, 1979, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to rename County Road 83, lying within the corporate City limits. The minutes from that meeting indicate this name change was being initiated due to "recent building in the area" . The name change was tabled until the May 10, 1979 Planning Commission meeting where the minutes reflect the recommendation to City Council that the new name for County Road 83 from Highway 101 to County Road 42 be "Duffy Road", "in conjunction with Prior Lake ' s agreement to rename their portion of said road" . At the City Council meeting of May 15, 1979, County Road 83 was renamed "Duffy Road" pursuant to recommendation of Planning Commission. After checking with Jim Karkanen at Public Works, and checking Engineering Department maps, we can find where no directive was ever given to incorporate this name change or to so sign the new name. I have called the City of Prior Lake and spoken with their City Planner, who was Planner in 1979, and would have been the person designated to make such an agreement to the name change of "Duffy Road" . He recalls no such agreement . They have never renamed this road to "Duffy Road" and it remains "Columbia Avenue" with no intent to change it. _ John Anderson June 8 , 1982 Renaming - Co. Rd. 83 Page -2- o"4/ Alternatives : 1. Do not pursue the renaming of County Road 83 to "Duffy Road" at this time and allow the 911 Emergency System to be in operation for at least a period of six months before feeding it an address •change. The disadvantage to this alternative is that we would then be assigning different addresses within six months to one year to properties just now being assigned an address . This alternative would take an action of City Council to amend their previous motion for the renaming of County Road 83 from Highway 101 to County Road 42 to become effective June 1, 1983 (allowing time for "dust to settle" with 911) . 2. Council could rescind their motion of May 15, 1979 in view of the current information received from the City of Prior Lake, and so direct a recommendation from Planning Commission to consider the name of "Columbia Avenue" so as not to conflict with Prior Lake . 3 . Council could rescind their motion of May 15, 1979 and not rename County Road 83 from Highway 101 to County Road 42 . Recommendation : Alternative No . 3 is being recommended for the following reasons : a) Addresses of County Road 83 have already been assigned to properties abutting County Road 83 and would prove to be a great inconvenience to change for all involved; b) The failure to follow-up on the renaming was just now been brought to the attention of City staff three years after the action of City Council; c) The City of Prior Lake has no intention nor can recall any agreement to change their "Columbia Avenue" to "Duffy Road" . Action Requested : City Council rescind their motion of May 15, 1979, to rename . County Road 83 from Highway 101 to County Road . 42 as "Duffy Road" and allow the name of County Road 83 to remain in effect . jiw �4 City ®f Shakopee ) • s" A • K p p F POLICE DEPARTMENT .. 4t4ES0qi\o 7, f� � V'� 1Al` / 476 South Gorman Street II�y, i( , 44.E• \,00 SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 —i E Tel. 44:3-6666 t. • 55379 ` TO: Mayor, Council Members FROM: Tom Brownell SUBJECT: Purchase Sound Level Monitoring Equipment DATE: June 8, 1982 INTRODUCTION On May 18 , 1982 Council directed staff to implement a noise abatement program using $1, 000 .00 of Revenue Sharing Funds. BACKGROUND Staff has researched noise monitoring equipment which would pro- vide flexibility to fulfill a wide range of monitoring such as moving vehicles, noise statutes and building code compliance. To fit our needs, a monitor must have the capability of being mounted on a vehicle and hand held. The instrument must have remote capability and monitor a minimum of 40 db with a fast and slow response. An instrument manufactured by Quest Electronics is the only unit which best fits our needs and has been used by an officer attending the state training course. RECOMMENDATION Purchase one Quest Sound Instrument and related equipment for $745. 00 from Northern Sound Company. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Authorize staff to purchase one Quest Sound Instrument and related equipment for $745. 00 from Northern Sound Company. go G EWE �o JzOtECt northern s 390 kiowa avenue,imisam ound st. paul, mn 55112 DATE 6-7-82 612-633-8475 FOI?MAT, l`UOTATION Company: City of Shakopee Police Dept. Address: 476 Gorman St. , Shakopee, MN 55379 Contact: Tom Brownell, Chief of Police _gamma ti a Manufacturer Describtion Price 1 Quest Community Noise Enforcement a� X745.00 ------e Kit. Includes: Model 214R-12W Sound Level Meter wj50 ' cable, remote microphone, ------- calibrator; carrying case; MT- 5 squad car window mount; WS-3 Windscreen; TP-2 tripod; 41, • wind gage. Comments: Short training session included with purchase. Delivery by: 2 weeks A.R.O. All prices are F.O.B. factory. Appl cable taxes are not included This quotation is effective for 3s r Unless specified, installation c377-are ynotrincluded. Pleaseom the above make r your purchase order to Northern Sound at the above address. We look forward to serving you. Sincerely, Northern Sound \r-cAt\ products for the control and measurement of noise * .o co VI co co ON (Fund P• * * * * * 04 (Priority cc-+ Q1 t- W N N (D Un Vt Un Un Un .n ..n ul a N o U) H H rn Program Number H Oro t i X tzi < tzi •i ti x t i w t� M tli < tzi c+ c+ H c+ cc+ y c+ y cc-'+ c+ c�+ H (D CJ) (D (D H a N a (D < tD '1 (D (D (D 0 a K a H a 0 m a a a 0 �' '• a n a El o (D a 0 0 o 0 a C) 0 C) I-. C) (D C) (D o (D 0 Cl) o 4 0 0 a 0 (V 0 o 10 0 O 0 c+ Cl) c+ U) (D (D Cl) P Cn to ti Cl) c+ Co c+ c+ c+ K c+ c+ c+ c+ V c+ C H K �� 0 by 0 t,, Description 49- O EA- 40 to N 0 t# fir 0 E9 0 � P) -EA- to o g N a C) '4 N)~ w 0D rn -' 0 c+ CID X. o (D ve •• v) co 0 1 W Z � is V7 V O V V O c+ 0 CA 0 cam+ O 0 (I) 0 nr. 0 0 O to 0 0 0 K 0 0 0 C)) 0 Cl) 0 O 0 • 0 (D 0 0 0 (D 0 N 0 0 co cc+ .) N 'V 4 CO •• ON easibi1ity •; CO N .• Co I N ii. eport . -I N • Q\ • — • SPUC •• NW NOJ •: co : N pproval iPublic c • N N • N . N IHeari ne ``a t=; H' x 1Plans and �_; •• • w co coNSpecifications t=-1 .77 • • • : •. z Jight-of-Way • N • : 1cquisition r3 8 • ," ; ` : opo Bid a : :. rn :. oD :. N (Date x t_. • �. : : a+ t• LA) • wNwjA ; ;:;mrI Hearing �' m b 0 w • 0\ • �o • .o •• m : 0\ • 0\ . 0\ : CoJompletion •• COp • a) • Co • co • Co 55,5 • opo : Co : 5„. ate •. .A- " N •• W •• N •• N •. N •. N 3ntri 30bd X0ed 3 (-) t0 Oto 0 t $ 0W 3 :') tz1 H o o °�` U rn W o 0 O 0 -1 0:3 H ...nwi W W ..O o 0 a.kJ, 0 awn j jEngineer � n .n Un r o 0 �) o c. o., 0 0 w rn � N ~rn oo C. CO Q owe 0 0 Technician III Cr •T P t, 00 r\-)0 W N W H N N echnician II ~. o o Cr` Co vi 0 0 0 --4 O N 0 w °v,` V, ---' 0 Co H co 0 rnrn Inspector I1 a ).4. i U• c•, 0 0 H no o oo oo 0 00 00 00o 0o or I o c H '1 -1 H O O W W O O H' Wo N N v, ~O o v~, 0 0. 'N• Secretary (n .1p V1 v! V1 V1 VO LA) OD N I-' N I-. N) 00 \0 CN O• W 0 0 H O\ �O W N H vli Q\o oo� N O Ui co Total Vl '.n Vl VI V1 VI V7 fii -1 H N N o\ -J N u 1-' N) N w N)ON H co I 1 W n -J \O 1 1 0 Un -4 \O N \n woo -) H Ln N I W LA) Engineering I w '0 0 - I I \o -4 -1 0 4 v~, 0 VI ON U) w Dept. Fee VI V1 Vl 0 0 0 • * o o N -4 w mFund * * * MP, H H H H H* H H 'Priority m CT V, .C' W N H 0 \O c+ �n V, •P" --1 V, V7 U, V, (D a N.. Ui H H H w \W„ 'Program Number H �8. t'7 m ''d t=] H t i C) P N tri ►-3 t+1 0 t!i ',7 N m m o m o m O Cn o m m m 0 m K c+ N• c+ .4 c+ M c+ • c+ M a c+ 0' c+ Ro • cpD fD P p aP EP :' am m & PA' HW c+ CD & 0 c+ K c+ • 0- 0 CD C+ c+ • c+ CT H'• CD 0 (D c+ (D m (D (D c+ 0 (D ►,y (D tt 0 \O 04 P, � a a A. co P. a P aero H a F• C) C) C) 0 0 n c+ C) 'c C7 c+ n o 0- 0 0 0 is 0 Z o • E 0 0 C 0 N, m C Cl) H m \ m W m pt m m o c+ m p c+ CD c+ 0 c+ H c+ a c+ c+ c+ c+ W c+ +4) H. c+ K .. P . O • . p D H 0 y • ort. • ON Description Ct-••• H N• Z c+ O 4* p M 0 04 44 P le 4 pp H• 430)- c-+ C') tt 70 m o O WO H CD $ 4- a -W. i • H. w gi l O 0 0, (D Vl Cl) 0 0 H O .. •• O O O cC O 0 0 Z• O --.1 CO 0 o 0 0 Cl) 0 0 0 (D 0 CD o a o O o N• 0 0 0 ►i o 0 O En H 0 ON H • x • rn ; ` • :. N 0. a a 0) ' CN° • 1easibility Report "' • 1Sq PUC a o° • N • N • Npproval • Co z . t„ P. z \ ..• ,„ • �Pub1 is • N • N : HeurinF :,; tr t-r. H j• • H 2' , • • • Pian:,' and •• N a a Specifications c: U 01 N Z Z • Z • Z • 't, � Bight-of-Way I' x •• W P. co • w cquisition �3 - N • . •- coN 3 � • � • • ON id• W a a : n) : w • w • IB Date a 1-' • v- •z x r• • A • ; fAssessment • N • a • wHearing 0 • • . • rn • v, •• ON • \O • Vo : _4 : Cr ; ompletian .--3 •• o •• Co •• CO • COp • COp • co • co . ate •••• F- - N •. N •• N •. W •• N •. N .. 3 C) W 3. O til M n W 3 O W Z n W M n W M O W 3 n W -4 H H O N) NCO N H Vt -4 ‘O H H Co W lajN JEnineer 00 -4 V, U O H O N 0 -.1 w ---1 -1 W W V, 00 -.1 000 Vi HP C" H N w H H 4-U, U, CO H W 'Technician III o' O Ovl w H OW O OD-.11" 00V1 000 0 0\ N.) 000 O H _ Vo v! (....) .P- NHechnician II "• CI MCo\O H H w N'0 -1 CD -= 0 Cou 00 \0 w o rn 0 -7 0 -70---4 o 0 .P- 0 0 0 H W \I 000 1ns p e c t o r I I ,: P �n N. c• a' Technician I N 000 000 000 00O 000 000 0 0 O 0 00 Inspector I o '1 Ha K -4 V, V, NN Secretary C/: 0 0\0 0 0 N 00\n O 0 00_3 00 � i O CYOU vl of v1 co W Nr P� H W � N)w \O N Cb H H' -J CT co 'Total �D 000 H O\H O N vi -�1 M m W .--4L0 W W O H W 0 CU\n . I VI V, VI U, N E!+ I -4 H H H v N w.N H'0 H °� Engineering 000 oHa, orn� v~iN-4 q) w0 IvNco n) n) ooC" Dept. Fee I I o0^1� I HO �n �N HH �D�Out V, W 0 11 0 V, v, cr. o "' o \r, 'Fund A O H \O h \D 1 * * * * * * N- w IN) H 0 o y friorit \n \n \n \n \n •n \n \n , H 0 o rn -3 0 w sw- frroCra Program Number UT] 'C UT 'O7 tNi C rill) :id tN (tD tU=i 8 =UJ n'• .ci • (13)1 ' •(1 6' o " a B ° g as . imi B. ro P3 o 0 Cr) ce, P3 d Po c w c+ < c+ M W cc c+ c+ c+ c+ tt+, tt=i 17 c+ 0 c+ H (D (D (D 0 a i (D 'O (D P (D ro ►s (D i (D X PH at7 � a ( P Pa a P, D) a C a o 0 m n 7c (o 0 c+ 7r 0 CD m 0 w 0 0 o '< 0 0 cD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 eD 0 :1 U) m c+ o m c+ U1 C Cl) G to M * Cl) Cr) U) c+ t::/ c+ 93 c+ 0m(D c+ 'i c+ (D c+ (D c+ W c' c+ .. 11 .• -3 .. w •• w •• K •• t, (J) o P CO c+ H, Ul H'• (D Cf P C Description hJ' c+ 0 N P. 5 H a () 4+ 0 4 -69 t+ C -Eft P 4+ 0 4+►'• 0 44 48 c+ H p (D R. v N. OG co M H' F'• .. pp (D H (D .. 0 co (D t+ OD N• N W 0 d O Co ;r 0 (<D c< 0 N w ( 0 OD V V • V V 0 V 0 0 0 U) 0 O 0 O O O o 0 < O c+ O O 0 a 0 0 0 0 (0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 • - x : N • w : -a feasibility : m• O\ o : Cu • a.) : a. Report .. N .. .. N .. N) .. N) n) • • . • :0 .) : : (>> Approval. .. •. N .. .. N •: tr., .• • . W T (Public . co . : a. ; Hearing .' .. .. N .. N .. tri ro . • W • : ---/ : l� : Plans and �+' . co • • •▪ co cr Specifications `" - N .. n) N tr. M : . . w : : w • \n Right-of-Way -way • • \ \ f1' a H • • : coN • : co : co cquisition .. y N �3 : : •: - • II3 i d • • . \ . • , au • cn • rn : DDate o .. .. .. N . n) R) '; x H •. vn • ' •• Co ` ---A • assessment '` . • co ' a3 ' coo Hearing ng .. N rri •• W N .. 'tt O H. • • : \O • 0 . CD . O\ Completion 3 • •• . : Co\ OD : \OD • 0) )ate .. .. .. •• N N w :. W :. 3r) bl into 30W 30Ui : (-J z) 3c) to 3c) W .'r> :) W HN-' N WH J W CO N W co 0 Engineer -p' OD0 0o 0 oo H-' 00 \O 0 H 0 0W H N \O.' 000 • 1/4.n 0 ON 0 ON n -1 N W Oh (� 000 001/40 00H 00 --4 000 oa\ 0 N \00 00N Technician IIIc '_n '1 N IT '✓ echnician II Cl) HH -3o 00N O0VD 00 00 H ON o0\ o000 � 0Ow Inspector II K w n Technician I 0 00 000 000 00 0 00 0 00 0 O00 000 Inspector I o x N '1 W \n N O\ H N \n ' Secretary en 00\0 0ow 000 00 -1 o 0 W \0W 0HN (.3 ow H vi VI vi \n 'II H 1'- H P . ---1 W H H N H .p- (..J Co.° --" Total co \n N N) 0 0‘-n O O\n 0 0 oD O H O\ W 0 .F"ON O Oa\ N 0 0 H • O • N N) O\ 1 \n \n W 1 40-0 N 0\ H -4 O• N Co NO CO Engineering \O 0^1 1 1 0 1 1 -1 1 1 No I W 0 -J Co OD H'0 1 1 0 Dept. Fee N -J H' 0 00 0 00 O 0 \p O a\W -P"\51 N CA-IN 0 p H \n 0 J 1 0\ 1 1 0\ 1 1 . 1 \O CD N 0 N 0 1/400 1 I\O \n o ' H N n W rn Ho � IFund * * * * * W N N N N N P, 0 OD C\ . 'Priority rIclVi v, Un N Ui ‘,11 `n m co -4 N Lk) N (Program Number Pi, H m 0 m x m w Cn M m w tri (db U) '.1 N 0 co c+ c+ c+ m c+ n C, c+ M. c+ g c+ m ' c+ 6 N 6 5 .c 6t•e 5' 6 � h 5. c+ c `+ c+ (D cc 'd m c+ y cC+ pVD C (() 0 m P p 0 (D t N R° P. (D (D (D pC (D c+ .4 (D Cr) • 1 a + a 't7 W P• H P• (D a c+ (D Pi c+ • 0 a0 Cl) n 6 n( q 0< n W 0 O n CDD 1-+. 0 b o f (D o N• 0 w o tai o (D co x m c+ m 'i m 0 m m m m (amp m c+ c+ n c+ aD c+ C c+ M c+ O• c+ I-• c+ }• cm+ c+ g c+ �"' Description RC) ►-{ IT w 61* aD - O 4* C 40 M E» (CD N• I K c+ N m (D 0 N CDD CI CO VI c+ 0 ‘,1W 0 O 0 0 0 m r •• V •• r (D cD 0 O Cn O O (D 0 O 0 0 0 '1 0 O o •C- 0 0 0 l' • o :o Feasibility • ••• •• • o •.• ..x o : : (Report c+ . ., P . •. • • f,. • S PUC •• • m • •1• •• a • Approval 0 1D r• t+. • • w • 1' • m •• •. OPublic • • m • :1, '."; m •' o Henri nf' 111 m M •• •• P • .4 • (Plans and .y • •. • I •• N • 1-'• Specifications n O 'o0 .. •• •, G • (D a M �Hight-of-Way ;, CD •• N • • • cquisition zko NI;' (rD ' 3 :. • c ., o • •• (Bid 0 • °, • (Date 0 x • Ci • H • • Assessment '` ; •• '' : : Hearing ' rri0 Completion 3 •;, ;, N • N ate 3 n to 3 0 CIO X (-) W 3 0 Ili :� n to 3 n cal 3 c7 bj :7 CT1 H N -.1 W W Q\ -J N o Engineer 0 W O oakO O 'O O 00N coco0 0 0 0 O O N o o - C' 3-, N - 3-1 'C H Technician Hi 0 0 0 00 O 00 O OOW NN 0 oo OD oo N 00v, J • Technician Ii m, oo-NJ 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 co N IND VI 0 0 .fit 0 0 0 0 COhInspector [ 1. ,+ �J \ 0 0 0 �p n CO 1-' \O S, , (1 (�. •) ' Technician I O O o' 000 000 0 000 000 00o 000 000 Inspector I g w x H •1 -4 N •P- O\ Secretary m 000 000 0i..ovi 0 ,00 : :: Hp co O O N O• F-' ko co H W N M ro opo orn o N) ootil 'C �o HH � 00 � o • NIT0tal - • 0 0 \n co o -D O\ 0 I I H W H OD Nc- --J-t Engineering v~, ro oko ow 3' oo ww'`I HH"' 0 0 0 Dept. Fee N I-' 0 1 OD0 1 W 0 I t 0 0 N N I I O� 10..\'P- 0 O O Un I 1 O * o I Fund to N !Priority a 'Program Number H * VD cn t ry u, w a w rn (-D o R a. C) o P c Description Fa H 0 CD 0 0 : • \ Feasibility . •. •: • : : : •• ro Report . . . . . . .• `-n ISAPUC • • co pproval • : • Public :. :. :. :. :. :. Hearing• z m x • ' -4 Plans and ~' • 7 • • • • . : . • N Specifications 0 m • ^r Right-of-Way • Acquisitionco ' .-3: • Co i d • • • . • •: oN° Date z x • • : : : : . : wc° Haring rrl 0 •. °` Completi0n ~3 : • : . . : ate pr.: x 0 to x C) td 3 C) di •X' c7 bpi ? (7 W X 0 W 3 :] W d g ry p. `< c* ro -4 o o IN" Engineer v, \Jt N �o t1 U) �,_, 0 0 i•' 'Technician 1 1 1 n ► W In rn rn �� it1 0 �- W c* w .'' '. w c w ro �- Technician II �,' aw t-' cr � 0 O o p -4 � -4 H � Inspector II ,c; d cn 'Sn ~' d echnician I ...1,*. .69 0 0 0 0 0 ( .Inspector [ o X H HVIN P.• ((D c+ K 1--' owoy r, � -Oiw o.N s- Secretary �' ••� \o H • • w H VI Vn ko \n \n CO 'U 0 o row ro w o .b -1oo Total H o oo o •vi `1 ) 1 1-1 vi VI rt. VI WV N r" 1.-' r Engineering 0 o w ry N CO o Dept. Fee 0 0 \oH \„ LA) Lk) so En a \.n \n Vn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rrogr. \o of --a rn '-Ti ..- N F-. um b e r P. H- O (p H 10.• (D rf cG cif n . b W P. 'G N a O N c_f Oq o co 0 0 P. y >✓ N E 'd N (p C Cl)0 En cc- W p H 04 ( U1 'd (D o Cf H. 0 • • . • rU • • d .. .. .. .. (D Md 51 • w x • 1 P-, • ch.• c) al • .• •• .. o r, c-t• m • w b • H .. •• (oId N z •• •• •• .. .. •• .. •• H f--H .•3'-• P. r 0 • • : •. • • : • y 3 o W 3 C) W X O W 3 O W :3: (") W 3 0th X 0 tii :--) 13:1 Hco 0 0 \n O W M WNO -P-00 0 0 0 0 -40 000 H O W 0 Engineer O V, V, C" ooV, ooV, oN \Wi, 00 ~o oo �, o0N N �" -I v+ Technician IlI cr O '0o -4 W vi '7 echnician II ~' w O\ CN\ H V, 3 —4 \0� w W N 0 0 W 0 -44- 0 0\ 4-- (.,../ H \A Inspector I I i 0 0 • 0 • V, o 0 o 0 • • VI y., . c• Ce sv ' 0 0 0 0 Technician I 0 0 0O 0 0 o 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Inspector I °° X H 14 N N 1-' - t- • Secretary En 0 0 0 ONS •P- ..--c) 0 00 \j, 0 0 0 O\ 0 O 0.C) H VD VI V, V, co N A) i---. 1--- N3 W \D W N V, N �, N ON H N �, TTotal (W D W O\ H 0 Op N N -J O O O \.n O N !- V, OD O\ f-' V'i „ 0 • W • 0 • 0 00 0 VI VI�n V, 1 VI O\ 1 V' N HN O\ ~ V, h' . W 1--' W t .L`") - Engineering N W N V,_,.I O\ 01\3 W • I 10 I .4 F. W 0 •-. Un o • Dept.. Ft'e fi' O f.� H -I O\ O\\O v, m ,O O O O O N \D -J CDN ^.1 vi \D 'J .p- \O H V, Vl \p 0 1 1 O 10 0 O\ Ou 0 W H J, • Vl V, ‘.n P H H t -.1 .P- .F- �- I Program w w N) 0 H H H H H rn P w I ' VI �- 1--, Number — iv �5� C D Cl) H (D 0 n o0 W CD 4 O K t7 H p• 0 to N a' f00 D H fp H• CD m (D c+ • 0 tD � K I-, a 4 0• Go o N P) N o W 0 p • OD is 0 0 ~' ~' 9 ID ._,H. to C) g PN p c+ c+ Pi ID amc+ H 11 fa• P. /,• (D In • x • • • C) .. •• .. .. .. • .. b t'1 to • • in • •• • : : •:• •: • r,�. n el c+ tri • • • • • • • I� :. :. . CD .. • : • 0 y • : : . . H. O N x H. C •• .. :. :•: •• •• • N 'tri d 0 7i 1 I 1 I .g- �- H N) ,p- H F~ IV Engineer O O I 0 0 1 O O 1 O N O O \o 0 O H O 0 G\0 H 0 0 VI C" w w ry H No Irechnician III o 001 001 001 000 O -40 000 ONO ONO O 'S d Technician II m 0 0 0 0 0 o..\ o a . - o ch o 0 -J -,7 Coo VI I.0 Inspector II w I I I 0 0 VI 0 • V1 p• c o' Technician I c+ 00 1 oo1 oo I 000 000 000 000 000 Inspector I o P t< x H vi cn H 1 1 N 1 H H N.0 Secretary o -.4 I o col H 0 1 00 0 00 n 0 0u • \J-1 N H 0 H 1/4.n \n Vi VI CO 'b H N N I, �„ H H-' H w rn r MI H J Total m O -11 1 0 OD 1 H a\ 1 0 OD N O N\p 0 H Vi -3 4 N N N 0 1 • I I I ut 0 VI 0 vi V1 --J 1 tPr N H' H H N -4 O Engineering I to I I 1 W I i H i NN coI (..0".g- H�rvko rnU)vn Dept. Fee O H 1 O 00 I H Vi 1 0 OD O\ 0 N N 0 -)-.1 w w 0 N O\ �- I 0 1 I O\ 1 N - 1 10 0 I VI I %.0‘51 10 '00 H 0v VI vi H H Lk) N ‘11 H H N) 1-I Numb e r En n n b -, x x d P.o cc-0 p H 1-3 0 0 (D CO log °� 0 01'. � aN c '-1 P. ro ~coam ti c+ ~ m n O o - A. M04 O ( `..4 a a 07 c+ �1 c+ cD . -cD P a w 1 H P, I-, O C 0 1-40 `"d 4 M Cl) pl 11) F-1 v • • • •• . . to .• .. .• •• •• .. .. • K tn • .. .. . �. .. .. .. rd tT] • . • H •• a • • • o .. • .. . • •. .. ..C . e) N h1 F-• 'V • •• •• . CD ••-3 'O •• •. •• •. •• •. •. •• MI F. N O -- o •-3 . .. ;c ' O .. .. .. .. •• .. •. H -1:2.3 r• x cf t-4 • . • •• tt N )j O . . . . . . . • "3 Xntz1 Xntb XnW 3C) w ? nbd Zntsf .r. nW tit -4 W _I N -P• 1 1 i 1 1 I Engineer 10 F-' 00 1 00 1 00 1 O 1 001 OO1 H °N`vN, 1 1 1 I 1 1 Technician III Q rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c •1 N1 1 1 1 1 1 Technician lI u• �n o 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 rn l Inspector• I I �� :' v, 0 ,'. Q• c ' 0 I 1 1 Technician I P. 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 i 0 0 1 0 0 1 W N 1 1 lr�s;�ector I X H o 1 1 H1 `n `NSecretary° I 1 • I m w W 0 o O•\ 1 O %._71%._711 O OD I \. O 0 1 0 H 1 O. I v ‘.n '31 vi ‘..n ‘,n \O CO N W N H • H vl \0 1 1 1 Total b N r o 0 o\ i v, 1 o CO i \0 0 1 0 F-' 1 o r- 1 • M \n H to \O CO Vn Vn �n `n rn WI 1 CO 1 ON 1 1 1 w 1 1 i t......)t......)t......)t......) Engineering 1 1 1 1 1 13 1 -4 . 1 I 1 1 fv.) 1 -4 0 "0 0 -4 1 0 cr I o N I H CO 0 " 0 F-' Dept. Fee CO W I OD 10 I N - 0 I CO I 0