Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/20/1982 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Non-Agenda Informational Items DATE: April 16 ,. 1982 1 . I was unable to shake loose a department head with sufficent time to coordinate a clean-up week activity, everyone has gotten extremely busy in the last few weeks . 2 . Eldon asked how we were handling inspection of the installation of propane tanks around town. I thought you would all like to know that everyone installed has had to meet the State ' s Liquified Petroleum Gas Storage Code . 3 . A 1981 year end Compilation of Financial Statements for Zylstra Communications Corporation was provided to update the previous statement (dated September 30, 1981 ) submitted with the ZU clarification of proposal . A copy has been provided to the cable consultant for her analysis . Copies will be provided to individual Council or Committee members upon request - call Jeanne Andre at 445-3650 . 4. The City received Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) "Proposed Rules Relating to the Implementation of the State Rail Bank Program" . Jeanne Andre and I have reviewed them and they appear reasonable. If you -are interested in looking them over give me a call . 5 . The City Engineer has received storm water problem complaints from Mr. Theis of Valley Publishing Company regarding both the school ' s blocking of the drainage way and the City' s culvert across CR 17 . Bo told him that we were up-dating our contour maps and that might shed some light on the problem. The City' s recommendation to raise the building when constructed was not followed by Valley Publishing Company. 6 . You are cordially invited to attend a slide presentation of the Ronald McDonald House on Tuesday, April 27 , 1982 , at 7 : 30 p.m. in the community room of the First National Bank of Chaska. Your hosts for the evening will be The Children' s Oncology Services of the Upper Midwest and McDonald ' s . Coffee and dessert will be served. RSVP - Theresia Brenke , 445-8050 or Jackie Kilpatrick, 448-6423 . 7 . Attached is a copy of letter from the Mn. Department of Health informing the City that Ken Menden has received his 'D' water supply system operators license . 8 . Attached are the Revenue & Expenditure Reports for the period ending March 31 , 1982 . 9 . Attached is a letter to Loren Habegger regarding complications with the Halo 1st and 2nd Addition improvements . We will keep you posted. Non-Agenda Informational Items Page Two April 16 , 1982 10. Attached is a letter from the Scott County Board regarding their position on the Seven Man Committee . 11 . Its spring again and attached is a copy of a letter to Mrs . Annen regarding the location of fences . It is included so that we can remind you that the City only provides minimal assistance in locating property pins . We do not place property pins , it must be done by a registered surveyor, nor do we "guess" the actual location of the pins before we OK erection of fences , etc . This is at times frustrating for homeowners because surveyors are expensive , but it is about the only practical way for us to handle the matter. Call me if you have questions . 12 . Attached is a memo from George Muenchow regarding developments on the tennis court lighting. 13 . Attached is a letter from Congressman Bill Frenzel ' s staff with a list of staff assignments should we want his assistance in any of these areas . 14. Attached are the recent changes in PERA. 15 . Attached are the minutes of the March 3 , 1982 Shakopee Police Commission meeting. 16 . Attached are the minutes df the March 15 , 1982 SPUC meeting and two resolutions they approved. 17 . While watching to stay within budget , we are going to paint the few interior walls at City Hall that are not paneled, insulate for sound between the Building Inspector' s office and Finance and possibly paint the trim in the rear of the older building. 18 . Good News ! St . Francis Hospital notified me today that Savage voted unanimously to contract with St . Francis for ambulance service for 3 years . There will be a letter comming regarding this May 4th. 19 . Attached is a memo from Don Steger on the action items of the Planning Commision April 15 , 1982 . ff EW1 : STATE OF MINNESOTA APR 7 1982 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION/PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF SIIAKOPEE Proposed Adoption of Rules Relating Notice of Intent to Adopt to the Implementation of the State Rules Without a Public Rail Bank Program Hearing. NOTICE is hereby given that the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) intends to adopt - without a public hearing - rules that are to be permanent, and that pertain to the implementation of the State Rail Bank Program. The Department of Transportation has determined that the proposed adoption of these rules will be noncontroversial in nature and has elected to follow the procedures set forth in Minn. Stat. § 15.0412, subd. 4h (1980) . The proposed rules are authorized by Minn. Stat. § 222.63, subd. 7. The proposed rules , if adopted, would: 1 . Establish criteria for property elgible for inclusion in the program, and 2. Establish public participation procedures for the acquisition, utilization and disposition of banked property. The Department of Transportation has prepared a statement of need and reasonableness that describes the need for and reasonableness of each provision of the proposed rules , and identifies that data and information relied upon by Mn/DOT to support the rule. Copies of the statement of need and reasonableness and of the proposed rule are available and may be obtained by contacting: Mr. G. W. Boldt Director Office of Railroad Administration Division of Public Transportation/Planning Minnesota Department of Transportation St. Paul , Minnesota 55155 (Telephone: 612-296-2452) Page Two - Notice of Intent to Adopt Rules without a Public Hearing. Interested persons have 30 days , until May 12, 1982, to submit comments on the proposed rules. The proposed rules may be modified if the data and views submitted to the Department warrant modification and the modification does not result in a substantial change in the proposed rule. Unless seven or more persons submit written requests for a public hearing on the proposed rules within the 30-day comment period, a public hearing will not be held. In the event that a public hearing is required, Mn/DOT will proceed according to the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 15.0412, subd. 4-4f. Persons who wish to submit comments or a written request for a public hearing should submit such comments or request to Mr. G. W. Boldt, at the address and telephone number previously stated, no later than May 12, 1982. If a person desires to request a public hearing, Mn/DOT requests that the person identify the particular provisions objected to, the suggested modifications to the proposed language, and the reasons and data relied on to support the suggested modifications. Upon adoption of the rules by the Commissioner, the rules as proposed, this notice, the statement of need and reasonableness, all written comments received, and the final rule as adopted will be sent to the Attorney General for review as to form and legality, including the issue of substantial change. Persons who wish to be advised of the sub- mission of this material to the Attorney General , or who wish to receive a copy of the final rules as adopted, should submit a written statement of such request to Mr. G. W. Boldt, at the address previously stated. Please be advised that Minn. Stat. ch. l0A requires each lob- byist to register with the State Ethical Practices Board within five days after he or she commences lobbying. A lobbyist is defined in Minn. Stat. S 10A.01 , subd. 11 (1980) as any individual : PAGE Three - Notice of Intent to Adopt Rules without a Public Hearing. (a) Engaged for pay or other consideration, or authorized by another individual or association to spend money, who spends more than five hours in any month or more than $250, not including his own travel expenses and membership dues, in any year, for the purpose of attempting to influence legislative or administrative action by communicating or urging others to communicate with public officials; or (b) Who spends more than $250 not including his own traveling expenses and membership dues , in any year for the purpose of attempting to influence legislative or administrative action by communicating or urging others to communicate with public officials. The statute contains certain exceptions. Questions should be directed to the Ethical Practices Board, 41 State Office Building, St. Paul , Minnesota 55155, telephone (612) 296-5615. Rlp and P. Braun Commissioner Dated this 29th day of March, 1982. 1/5/82 [REVISOR J WPG/RR RD157 v 4. #t516»a�3 � MAR 1982 N 1 Rules as Proposed (all new material) `s DRAFT o� ti pu 2 14 MCAR S 1.4010 Definitions. For the purposes of 14 MCAR!!f �5Z8Z12 3 1.4010-1.4016 the following terms have the meanings given them. 4 A. Acquire. "Acquire" means to purchase a rail line with 5 state funds provided for the state rail bank program. 6 B. Betterments. "Betterments" means required improvements 7 made to acquired property to prepare the property for continued 8 rail use. • 9 C. Commissioner. "Commissioner" means the Commissioner of 10 the Minnesota Department of Transportation. 11 D. Continued rail operations. "Continued rail operations" 12 means the utilization of a rail line for rail service upon 13 acquisition or in the near or immediate future after acquisition. 14 E. Convey. "Convey" means to sell, lease, or grant an 15 easement for the use of rail bank property for the purposes 16 cited in Minn. Stat. S 222.63, subd. 4. 17 E. Department. "Department" means the Minnesota Department 18 of Transportation. 19 G. Dispose. "Dispose" means to convey property to a 20 governmental subdivision of the state for any of the purposes in 21 Minn. Stat. S 222.63, subd. 4, or to sell the property as 22 provided in Minn. Stat. S 222.63, subd. 5. 23 H. Other uses. "Other uses" means any uses of banked 24 property other than those specified in Minn. Stat. S 222.63, 25 subd. 2b. 26 I. Preserve. "Preserve" means to hold rail bank property 27 during the period of time it is not being utilized for the 28 purposes specified in Minn. Stat. S 222.63, subd. 2b. 29 J. Project. "Project" means any rail line proposed for 30 acquisition, and rail lines actually acquired under the program. 31 K. Program. "Program" means the state rail bank program. 32 L. Rail line. "Rail line" means abandoned railroad 33 roadbeds, right-of-way, track structure, and other appurtenances 34 of railroad right-of-way including public-use sidings, and 35 railroad buildings. 36 M. Railroad. "Railroad" means a rail carrier as defined in APPROVED IN THE REVISOR OF STATUTES 1 OFFICE BY: ,,>�:/vim ly,tb 75 l7� 1/5/82 [REVISOR ] WPG/RR RD157 \J a� ' • • • � ;1•112,7k1 y1 the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 United States Code, Secti " 2 10102(4), (18) and (19) . �11£CE6? ;�� 3 N. Utilize. "Utilize" means to use banked rail lines for • 4 the purposes cited in Minn. Stat. S 222.63, subd. 2b. 5 14 MCAR S 1.4011 Program criteria. 6 A. Eligibility for acquisition and preservation. An 7 abandoned rail line is eligible for acquisition and preservation 8 in the state rail bank if it meets the requirements of Minn. 9 Stat. S 222.63 and 14 MCAR SS 1.4010-1.4016. 10 B. Funding criteria. - 11 1. The following criteria will be considered in 12 determining whether a project will be funded: 13 a. the availability of program funds; 14 b. the probability of the rail line being utilized for 15 the purpose identified; 16 c. the likelihood that an alternative rail line 17 right-of-way could not be reestablished in the future; 18 d. the adequacy of the title and the costs to cure any 19 defects in the title; and 20 e. the likelihood that no other entity will acquire a 21 rail line for an appropriate use. 22 2. Special consideration and priority shall be given to 23 rail lines meeting the criteria specified in a.-d. Priority. 24 shall be given in the following order: 25 a. rail lines that are to be utilized for continued 26 rail operations; 27 b. rail lines that are needed as part of the future 28 overall rail system; 29 c. rail lines that have an identified future use that 30 will benefit a greater portion of the state; and • 31 d. rail lines where the identified future utilization 32 includes more than one use. ' 33 C. Continued rail operations projects. The following 34 information shall be used to establish the priority for 35 continued rail operations projects: 36 , 1. the costs of the project compared to t04E5s REVISOR OF STATUTES 2 OFFICE//BY: 1/5/82 [REVISOR ) WPG/RR RD157 • MAR 1982 N co 1 resulting from the project; DP,_AFT 2 2. a detailed plan of operations for the rail line; aye `63S, / 3 3. a detailed plan providing for financing of the project. 4 14 MCAR S 1.4012 Acquisition of rail bank property. 5 A. Published list of proposed projects. The commissioner 6 shall publish notice in the State Register listing the rail 7 lines proposed to be acquired. The notice shall also be 8 published once a week for two consecutive weeks in at least one 9 newspaper of general circulation in the areas where the rail 10 lines included in the list are located. After an initial 11 publication, subsequent lists shall be published as necessary. 12 The published list shall include the following information: 13 1. a statement that the list is published pursuant to 14 Minn. Stat. S 222.63, subd. 3; 15 2. the name, length, and owning railroad of each line; 16 3. the counties where each line is located; • 17 4. any identified future uses for each line; 18 5. the abandonment status of each line; 19 6. the name, address, and telephone number of the 20 department's contact person; and 21 7. other pertinent information. 22 B. Initiation of title search. A title search of the 23 property proposed for acquisition shall be initiated after the 24 procedures under A. have been completed. For rail lines not yet 25 abandoned, a title search shall be initiated after the owning 26 railroad has filed an abandonment application with the 27 appropriate decision making authority. To inform the public of 28 its action the department shall publish a notice in at least one 29 newspaper of general circulation in the area where the line is 30 located. 31 C. Public information meeting. After the title search has 32 been completed the department shall hold at least one public 33 meeting to provide information and to seek comments from the 34 public. Notice of the meeting shall be given by publication in 35 at least one newspaper of general circulation in the area where 36 the rail line is located. The meeting shall be held at least APPROVED IN THE REVISOR CF STATUTES 3 OFFICE 3Y: 1/5/82 (REVISOR J WPC/RR RD157 • MAR 1932 1 three days after publication of the notice. At least one fr, 2 meeting shall be held in the area where the rail line is located-:""` 3 D. Decision to acquire. The commissioner shall decide 4 whether or not to acquire a rail line after the public meeting. 5 The decision shall be based upon the program criteria cited in 6 14 MCAR S 1.4011. The department shall publish notice of the 7 decision in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the 8 area where the line is located. 9 E. Simultaneous implementation of 14 MCAR SS 1.4012-1.4014. 10 The commissioner shall simultaneously implement the procedures 11 for acquisition, utilization, or disposition of rail bank 12 property when it is possible. The initial notices which are 13 published in the State Register and newspapers shall include a 14 statement noting which procedures are being implemented 15 simultaneously. 16 14 MCAR S 1.4013 Utilization of rail bank property. 17 A. Notice to utilize rail bank property. The commissioner 18 shall publish notice in the State Register when the department 19 is considering utilizing banked property. The notice shall also 20 be published once a week for two consecutive weeks in at least 21 one newspaper of general circulation in the area where the 22 property is located. The published notice shall include the 23 following: 24 1. a statement that the notice is published pursuant to 25 Minn. Stat. S 222.63, subd. 3; 26 2. the identifying name, length in miles, and acres of 27 land of the property; 28 3. the counties where the property is located; 29 4. the purpose of the proposed use and the conditions 30 under which the property would be utilized; • 31 5. the name, address, and telephone number of the 32 department's contact person; and . 33 6. other pertinent information. 34 B. Public information meeting. After the procedures under 35 A. have been completed, the department shall conduct at least 36 one public meeting to provide information on the proposal for APPROVED IN THE N ISOR OF STATUTES 4 O fii,E OY: //.i 1/5/82 (REVISOR I WPG/RR RD1S7 co MAR 1982 ©RAF' 1 utilization and to seek comments. Notice of the meeting sh 1`n 2 be given by publication in at least one newspaper of general 3 circulation in the area where the rail line is located. The 4 meeting shall be held at least three days after publication of 5 the notice. At least one meeting shall be held in the area 6 where the property is located. 7 C. Decision to utilize. The commissioner shall decide 8 whether or not to utilize the property as proposed after the 9 public information meeting. The department shall publish notice 10 of the decision in at least one newspaper of general circulation 11 in the area where the line is located. 12 14 MCAR S 1.4014 Disposition of rail bank property. 13 A. Notice to dispose of rail bank property. The 14 commissioner shall publish notice in the State Register when 15 considering disposing of property pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 16 222.63, subd. 4, or when required to dispose of property 17 pursuant to Minn Stat. S 222.63, subd. 5. The notice shall also 18 be published once a week for two consecutive weeks in at least 19 one newspaper of general circulation in the area where the 20 property is located. The published notice shall include the 21 following: 22 1. a statement that the notice is published pursuant to 23 Minn. Stat. S 222.63, subd. 3; 24 2. the identifying name, length in miles, and acres of 25 land of the property; 26 3. the counties where the property is located; 27 4. the reasons for and the conditions of the disposal; 28 5. the name, address, and telephone number of the 29 department's contact person; and ' 30 6. other pertinent information. 31 B. Public information meeting. After the procedures under • 32 A. have been completed, the department shall conduct at least 33 one public meeting to provide information on the proposed 34 disposition and to seek comments. Notice of the meeting shall 35 be given by publication in at least one newspaper of general 36 circulation in the area where the rail line is located. The APPROVED IN THE 5 REVISOR CF STATUTES OFFICE BY: 1/5/82 [REVISOR ] WPG/RR RD157 MNTI i9E2 e C . t. ;1 f' 1 meeting shall be held at least three days after publicati o "'"" a a/ i 2 the notice. At least one meeting shall be held in the area`°r6?SIi -' l 3 where the property is located. 4 C. Decision to dispose of property. The commissioner shall 5 decide whether or not to dispose of property after the public 6 meeting. The department shall publish notice of its decision in 7 at least one newspaper of general circulation in the area where 8 the rail line is located. When the property is to be sold 9 because it has not been utilized, the notice shall include the 10 following: 11 1. a statement noting the required six-month period which 12 allows owners of private property adjacent to the banked 13 property to make offers to purchase the property from the 14 department; and 15 2. the name, address, and telephone number of the 16 department' s contact person. 17 14 MCAR S 1.4015 Management of banked property. 18 A. Maintenance and other uses during preservation of 19 property. Rail bank property shall be maintained and may be 20 leased for other uses while it is being preserved in the 21 program. Proposed other uses for rail bank property shall be 22 considered if they meet one or more of the following conditions: 23 1. uses which were in effect prior to department 24 acquisition of the property; 25 2. uses that minimize maintenance costs and maximize 26 income to the program; 27 3. uses which are not in conflict with adjacent land 28 uses; and 29 4. uses that provide a benefit to the state. 30 B. Other uses during utilization of property. Other uses 31 which were in effect while the property was being preserved may 32 be continued while the property is being utilized for the 33 purposes of the program. The other uses shall be continued if 34 they do not interfere with the utilization of the property. 35 Other uses which were not in effect prior to utilization may be 36 allowed if they do not interfere with utilization of the APPROVED IN THE REVISOR OF STATUTES 6 _ OFFICE DY, 1/4/ 1/5/82 1'"°767., - (REVISOR I WPG/RR RD157/- :0 1 property. . w� 2 14 MCAR S 1.4016 Administration of the state rail bank program-- 3 A. Provision of information for continued rail service 4 projects. The entity proposing a continued rail service project 5 shall provide the commissioner with any pertinent information 6 necessary to achieve proper evaluation and adequate 7 administration of a project. The information shall include 8 financial, commodity, cost and operations data, and other 9 similar types of data and information. 10 B. Contracts. Executed written contracts shall be the 11 documents used to commit betterment funds, implement utilization 12 projects, and to authorize other uses of banked property. 13 C. Variance. The commissioner may approve a variance from 14 any of the provisions of 14 MCAR SS 1.4010-1.4016. 15 1. A variance shall be granted if: 16 a. the rationale for the rule in question can be met 17 or exceeded by the specific alternate practice proposed for 18 substitution; 19 b. the application of the rule in question would 20 impose an excessive burden on the person or entity applying for 21 the variance in attempting to carry out the intent of the 22 program; and 23 c. the granting of the variance will not adversely 24 affect the public health and safety. 25 2. The commissioner shall set forth in writing the 26 reasons for granting or denying a variance. 27 3. The person or entity who is granted a variance shall 28 comply with the alternative practice granted by the commissioner. 29 4. The person or entity who is granted a variance shall 30 immediately notify the department of any material changes in the 31 circumstances which justified granting the variance. 32 5. A variance shall be revoked if material changes occur 33 in the circumstances which justified the variance, or if the 34 person or entity who was granted the variance fails to comply 35 with the alternative practice granted by the commissioner. APPROVEDIN THE REVISOR OF STATUTES 7 OFFICEBY: t i 1 You ane eondia£2 y invited to attend a 42Lde pnezen.ta.t.on o4 the Ronald McDonald Houuse on Tue.sday, Ap.Le. 27, 1982, at 7: 30 p.m. .in the community room o4 The F,vc4t Nationa.2 Bank o4 Chayslza. your hoots 4on the evening w-1U be The Chi..2dnen' .s Oneotogy Senvc,ee4 o4 the Upper Midwest and McDonald' 4 . Co44ee and de44ent w.itt be 4enved. RSVP - Thene4ia Menke - Community Re.eatLon4 Repne4en-tative - 445-8050 Jackie KLf pa.tn.ick - Community Re.2a.t,ons Rep' e4entat-Lve - 448-6423 7 RCE minnesota department of healthAPR 1 4 1982 • C-2) 717 s.e. de'aware st. minneapoiis 55440 (6121296-5221CITY OF HAKWPEE April 12, 1982 Mr. Kenneth P. Menden 1050 Sibley Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Mr. Menden: It is a pleasure to inform you that you have passed the written examination for water supply system operator, Class D . Upon receipt of the $15.00 certification fee and the copy of this letter, your application will be submitted to the Certification Council for final approval. The certifi- cation fee should be made payable to the State Treasurer, State of Minnesota and should be mailed to: Section of Water Supply and General Engineering Minnesota Department of Health b„ 717 S.E. Delaware Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 Your written examination is available for your review up to 60 days after the date of the examination. If you would like to review the examination for your own information, please feel free to call Doug Mandy at 612/296-5525. You are to be commended for the interest you have shown in the waterworks field and the effort made to meet the requirements for certification. Yo rs very truly, Gary L. und, P.E. , Chef Section • �7ater Supply and General Engineering xc: City of Shakopee ,/ an equal opportunity employer ICU • - -.1.- - , , . ,. , , i 7 '. : a ,.-. '_ 1 !: S' ::' ; ',:: ,, r. ''. ',::,f. l: ;;, :- . 7 ', i !:. F.• '.- 4 ; ; ; 7: :: i -. :I:: t. :r; ':;•;',- :; :, . :; ! ',",..' ',' : :7:: t• 7 7. rTf• 60 .4 1.- SO ' • CL to • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 %D AP.4 0 .4 r,W.ct 0 P..4 In P.M) P.-'C.. ONO 0 000001.- , PM n.I .-4 ..1.4 CI.4 PI 0 cm IV 0....0 NNO WN 14 NNmm..:4PI 1.1 r o LI I I I iiiiiiiii 1111 I 5 5 5 I 5 II I I I I I I 1111411111 O U 0 CV P. .r.. c+ , r c,PO r. ,4 e- , 0...f,C. P- PI,0 CV c L..( cs c 13 CV.• C,4. . M ft.. c,f_. --, C.I.,... c ( .. .r• a. 2 IN 0 P,- " , •. , ,-, • ,, r•-• r ..o,• r.0 . , 1 t, 0 P- 4.VI t •, •...• t -..u,tn in r)0. er, rrr ( Or. ,, cMin . C 4, 4, • iseels • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •4 .. ..4 0) In . 0 , 14 0 .-.4e. 0) 0PNr , W /..-emw.) 0 r .-.or,' 1... • NM ••••• - - M00" . .., , W ("Jr3 N APC,, ,DOIMMIs- CPcv0044CPc3N .4 NrOM ,.•, m60oo-Jtpon 0 4 WO w 6.1.44P1P. MMMMOMMP4Mm M O..40.4 con4h100h..u0N M > So • So Sow s. .. • 111. Ilk 0 Cs1 ON CO CC ,a. 0 In 0.4 .4 .. 41. .4 ,p. 0 cm.4 P.CA P.- 0.O.r, Cr 01 C) CO V)4 rn .4 CO a) 41 U).4 P. PI WI .4 P. HI In 0.1 PI CO 41 .4 c4 Pfl .4 i P. P. CV *-1 In ..1 01.• • n o 4 ' PI 4 U)CC 14) '7 Li r c. c, et c,P.C3 4.4 C.4=V) 4.3 C. C. PI PI 4. ec,, C r , r C4 13 ,4 43 CD 44 t.,r- c- r Cf I.e, I (73 , r IL :3 P- 0- CV CD If r+r,01 c,r,CV 4.4 0 0 r.0 r, c,in AP P. et,4t , c,r,r, 01 U3 VI CI 41. r, P. 0 OF- • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • CI CV CO .4 In ,11 c, 6.4 4.o.4 PI CO c, W cD ka .4 I.-P. ,13 s', 0 CP P. P.se Ws 0 In.4,, CO CC' 0 P.C PI PP. In ,IM ,PP..4 LO ('Si po em At U) 0)r,.... pki p. mr 0.0 AI .OJ Ul ar r,AI fin ti,e.WI mc VI Pe, 4 WI ,0 , V:1 Si)0 PI cu.4 .4 CV In Pn 4.0 cv .4 AP W. wl r, 0, CO .4 P. .4 On CV • a 0 • • IP • • 5 • • • 4. • • • • • C) 0 kw . ' AP 1 AP ,C,1 C4 or. 'Por r..1 P. P.4. 111 r IC' In ...-i ••-.1 , .4 . CJ 'C 0, .13 0 r, N • 4 1 I I . ' I ' M 4 • : , I : ' • , . , . . . . : . I.) = .6 5 Cs C I 444. en cr,43cr, 414- 014000 0 ..) C.• r.,'r c),Cat.) r,000 nit. clo L. 'L.• rD Ls C.: , r C.- CIL C . I 2 (DI- CI MC. ctractc,,c•CI ,c.04, , c,r, , C,,, e- CIC., , , ,,nr•Crs , r. ,, ,,, /,r1 ,-, 1.t.Je , -,e, La • • • * Swot . . . woes ' 0 110 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 24 csm eI r.r,cc?qc!0m00001=00 c, 0 tl 0 0 0 0 0.0 cr.!0 4 Cn c,cl 0 c 41...,, cp c,4....., la W.- V. .-.... ...............m .......... .-4..4.-, ,, rt, 0 - a, 4-, 0.... ....m . ,.. c m ,...-. .,.. .-. ..... .- ... , cc 00 0 or ...44r4M4P-0....0.-.4.4.1.7.,0 ' WI 41,0.4 OD 01 0 cD 4.rt C,W, 0, .,r- r,r,r, er r.. r r. ..-, S . • o o o • o o • • two • CP WI AP 0 0 r, 0 PI w4 4 41 Ofl -440)OI40 , S NWStrlso N.-Icor. F- Om cc, m et • cr. (%.1 inni.....mp-0 P... .... ..,, .., ... 0 h. 1-. ..4 m n.I X. .4 , 1.1 I.• U C h. . CC 41 ., U • . 7 . Cl. 4 I- 5,5 re C Cr S-? I I.- • 41 2 7 0 7 I u I , • a o r, In . . . „tr.r% .....1 In r,r..,...,.... rs r c, VI pl +1. a- , . ., ,. N CC ..,. •. • 0m . . t- , t es ,- ., Is- . I. , - 1,1 Mre-prr -, MO r, . LCI ,..,.rro -, e,,e- 1.... fti M0 , .. r. - no, . , ., " • -- • • • . . . . I. . . . 4, w • • • OOOOO • • • • • • • • esis . • • • • • • • > U CV CV i .4 U3 W1,01 0 0 co c. 0 P. P.0 4 0, e4 Cr. pl c c, 0 cm(V 2 0 0) I PI I 1 WI cD01110 06.0mc6 4 N411, 'NO M * W0Mm ., 41I0 4 0.4 44 4 P. .4 CO 0 0).4 ,..4 4 -, 0 0 .4 eM III 1 41 , • I . it 1 i • to I 1...pt. 4.. 4. • r•' 0, ! 1.- CC . 1 1 .4 1 I N v.4 101; ; ; 1 L ;Ch 1 CV' "4 ! 0 Cr . • ' . I ' 1 I i 1 a 1 ! 1 ' -I I I I , I 1 1 : I I . : I : 1 . i I , I ' 41 i ' ' I 1 LJ 1 1 ' I 1 • . I , i 1 . i CC I I 1 ! I • 1 i , I i I 1 , 0 I i 1.11 I I , • , In I , 64 $4' 1 ,CA 1•I I In V) 1 1 4 1... I I = . i I i 8 I 4'17iml .4 1.-. w Z17' kJ ; F- 14 ti 1 In W v,,LJ W ' 0 r , 1 S. .4 W V) F- 4 20 P. ! I ro _Jou w 0 Wowc[1. M F- 0 =02 00 0 0 WILU w 0 6i 0 1 LI Li W.4 m F- W1.-- 1.01, W 5.-,, ' N. Co 41 W . .0-.0 0-4M 0-4 id 0.4 I" U 2 1 00-0 0 V).J ZVIV,Me Wm CL CLUJ 1.11 1.4.1 V1 0 WI 4 0 0 La F- LiC'7 U 5W 41 :0 2U L., I cr 0- In 2 Z 1.1MMIr 0.4 0. r 0 00 i-0407).4 0 r C) C) cr 41 0. u.2 n.-1 ...ta V) a-.•-,et Cr 0 O I 7 4 0 64 4 2.4 ..1 U W CD 1411 til.141 4116 1 0 UW ONJUN MWKW WWWN!J 0 1-47k4r40 40 M m S0C/WWW 01 7 CU 11 WIrmWOJWCCCLOWWmMIJ WWX.14W WW MM r =4 ILl 41 5-0)7540) U4W r 0 2 0.4 ow 71..0-00,z4w4c=0- 0.4 N.4 7 0.6101" (4111. 16 fr cn U 7 4 '!*4 CI W O.Ct. .J.4 Kt.J W 115 0) 2: 44 r 4 2 41 0-2 .,.4 4c • 0 PC CC 41 7 ar W IC 1.- ex CP W VI LICr 5- F- 64 W 0 W GI 2 u 4s2 .4cL. 201 40 cf.acceaw> 0-0-00- 2:...w20.40022NT ; 7L > 0 -au 0-,MwcommuU002U w U0 2 X0026- uw00occ IC a. CS of I-tst Cr EC!tst 10 L 1 Li 4 WC LI 04.41-- Mu0770,4w441-I 74 W M W Cl) AOMWr M tiwoaww'rzu.re Ci 0 -I-1 ce -1 w 1...o....1...0.7 (1. m.o.. X WWF- 0 W Z WSM In ....,WWOU001S 0 4 0 0 OCC . J 00) 4. WS. W . 7 0 •100WUW.J.JUW01.. 0. Ww2m7 In mw 0.1 .... au w DC) 001.1 w -IrM.J.wwwww w7 .4w .0-040- ,,-i.c.40..6.42v 2 J.40.4 ,044,24W1, 1..! 4.41.. zo X 0w20000.-.74JUI4Wcc4/)m U 002w0U0 >U0-0-177 0 0U200000UO2 c..z wi... a ...wr-..4.4007wwWwUt- . , .... w00 ,01-0......0...10-00o. 2 0 .40222-100 -17 u ow F- UWW0200. xmir30)wo2:w u m2200m00.3006u0 0 u>41a.wW13. 0011.0 0 cy 0 U 0.4 Cq • .4 CV 4.1 4r VI Cy.4 cy PI,41.0 0 P. CC 0,.4 5 0 0 P.' CC CP.4 N PI 4.4 e4 4 45 c., 4 0 0 h-CC Ch 02.4 1,1 PI 4P UI er 2 (..) 44 N S .....to,*6.4.1101 I,P1 Pn PI Pn 4P 0 r c,c rs rq C4 cv eN 01 P,PI PI AP 0 4. •MI 41 HNMIPI.4.1M101.101.4M,P, • ounomintronlrimin r4 EC pr,":,r.; : rImplmtnrInnninrlontnrnno., 4 nnelmelm4Imn4141n,10, 4 nelmmelvaK,m41;q4) - •4 •1 • • •t. • • '2 : . . . .,- .• - 1- nd ; 2 2 . ,. . « . Z R .7. ; ; A A R ',:i $ X T - I r ) 0 N..' N.. ' ‘..• , .... . _.. 0 10 2.101.414.2,111 I.. ....... p-w n. 'o ^ •' •' i. N N e. 7 1. N N N .. fl o e•'_;:. X A A n h P. $ e $ a i $ $ Q e < n r 2.2 r. i Y' P n 3:_k C 0 0 i• V C C : i (- m. N P. I U 0' I f N 0 I!) Ill t 0, •t C0 CO a • • • • • • • • 0 • • o 0 0 .+N U) ♦ N M P I .r N Is ♦ It) ♦ N N .., I-I I 41 M .-. L^ W 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 a U C r . r C, cO cl U)C C,r - ra-.C OC C))C) : - .0 C C)t:,.:. co .•I i a 2 r r' r.. :, 0 :•", C r-.N t r r. C,N It) T Q • • • • • • • • • �-• • r• • • • • • • • �• • • •.. •P CC v ;,PM •'f^ '., r NP ., ,0 O, 0 0 C N.--, 0 Ut'.0 cP C'c', oc': M O o C. CO O N N Q N 0 M ....L_ Md 0 .4M CO ,0 o N r,P 0 ea U) , - • • • • • • • • • w w ► 0 • N rot ./ n 0 .400 00 Cl 0 N C• a' m W , .n ..4 (T, Nm 0 03 I 1 .1 t .4 1• • j In •-1 C J Q c. c,c, c, CI Q:r c.c.c]Cr c.c c,c1C,G c e G O c,Cr O N 0, 1 L_ 7 e+rJr,..c,O r,mc, c,c,cle, r.n Cf caM tnebonoM 0 C, O Oa. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i U O P. m .4 P .1 P.N O T 0' N H Q IA A Q1 T N T• w ,U' T �+ NI .'i a P p) N I CO C .4 U) •r•0 d' 0• i . iN I I- U ' W W I O C eta --a 00 C'OOC QC O C3 C'C,ca C) P [,O OCA,CJ OI u Z c,Or ,r, OC., c,nhr,C C, c.,r-.00lr,C.C,GC.dr', rr r) L1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • } ocq„ .c,Ocgoc! oaoq 0o4z4;. .0 io Ic N , 1.1 r .-. Cl ,n r, n,• r,r ...-.I r,o I C, U) 4 CC 0' 0- .0 Nr,MPO ,N1.500 .,cNnP 10 T, N • • • • • • • • • • w a • tel U) {f) N 0 U) ,NPI 1C1.0 I M N W f. ./ .-1 -NN -NO O' ft, o I i ..• .r fh N 1.1 0 N U a me •W O U 2 I , a a I 1 . 1 LIet I 4 a 2%. I , LJ s j i 7 oI II • I 2 sJ I I . I a r .. r+n CCnP,Ourr-ar- nI.-.r,hN,0oern•-it, P, N W 7 r•,.-.Q .-1.,14.1.. ., - c N.-.r. .-, 'f) .r1 N I 1 -H 1 • •! • • • • • • • • • •r• •',• •�• • • • • •.0 • • • } U r a' cC P ..r P. rC I 'N 0• : ,Cf O,I 0 i 1 Z 4 I() N 10 O M 0+ 0•.. •4 Cr N, LI N P 'PI .4 N i CPCV II CD; 0 j La 0.1 a 1 I M '...••T NI N , ' a j I I U LI I 1 2 • 2, j 1 i i I vl 0 l I I 1 It W P. j , I i F- W W UI co J Ur I .1 ton '. N • of i O z 00 a/oo O a a N LJ 2 4I 01.4 >'LI Z O W LIC L1 •t < i e a!> Jal24rooa 02 22 I. )- i 10 7Z a- O W.-•PWI- 1 J20 .rU 1/)•;�, I I OI CI 4.O Y W ONlLLN aoOIOU LL S' ^ N 4- .4 1- CC OM O P- O O Z •o 10 o W Y J .. cr.-4..1 1 • 1 LII•!0 a W O. (#11.4 1-J Wfe 7 > ' Q a a1 W•l q o V)U W Y 1 W CC J W h.:.. U t C � L I C C > Y 7••I N a U U J J 7 0 W W W 7. W W O4JO►-3OJWJ •-•2 0lOU 1- . 2 > W ZL LLC IYT.F- • .-IO41JY ' P. 000 U 01- 2 < W I LL LIN R LI 1 2 N C) 11.d 7 7 ,...26.. LI W N L1J 2 j N 0 ►-auao UZW 2V1... tIY02WZ I . 2 •W • W •O OCNZ • CIH4r-.a4. W cc I I- \ -.. U W 3 0 0 0 U 7 W W...o r.Y U Z U)a W ZD O Ll . 1- •-i JI/)COW02 V)7a CWi i I -ow7Ch- 1-ccy. N = I 1 .-r c, .r1..•-ZW►-Or-.Olr►.iULIO74.010a WZW U CI LLSNN2ZUSaI . * C000W 1IUMW 6-.14 . a O N OU '.0 P.CO O N M P .•N M)O U) C'.•N Y)1D O 4.14.4 a GL P • C Sr C:) .•.•.4 N N NN M 011M�UMt M e 0001.a-.1M. r.4M N) 0` • .ai i!.0 n nntncco InInnnM InInfn lInln IR 03 • I ` K I - 1y N A f w • 1, • • N N N N N N N N N A) R n A A n A A 7 A A 3 . . I. 3 . . . . . R • n n A I; * %,/ 1 • .-1 I- U U TOM• .O .O In M c HTT N d N4N N In A T 0 C* 0- , G • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' • • • • • • N N I()C .-C • N M c, If)M 0. 0 C, O T d N T In M... .4 • n1 d N N C.1 N • N N .4....N .. .4 .4 .4 .4 W U W ! 4 U • 0,*0.4 T O A oN d Cr, r,.- In CO M C,.,CG If) .Ou CO IC)CO c, n 0 c T Cl G c. .•n C, C.c M IC)r C C,c,C. c' c. it, 0. Z CO d Cr.0, CO r, ..r-,Cr, H .O n N ..N r c. CC .4 c.. • 4 Ce H - r-,c> C r:c• C• in M r u c^ �,1O..C• .,r .-4t. , . 0 R • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• N e' .•1• HN . ..♦P. T N .. H ,••M . 11,r. d OIn .O N cc. .�+• C,! ,•M N • M N. .OdMA.DMNH .O 0)0c'. M .D c• r 0 O HOTTNII) N N ap We to •.0 W U)H..c0 N..,0 NO • •- c31.-1.11,..W00 '.0..0N .0M N • T NN IC) ,O CO > 000000000 • ao. S. w w w • w • •• •• • • • • 5 N t ii)*e_,N .O N.-1 t .. N NTN..CT a r (.04043p. m r+ n ..4.0 .4 N .1 Q) W '.1).•N *M..H N .. ON moo- co o M .r H • N .. 0, I N H .. .. n .4 N • •M .I • I Q •M 0 J I I I 4 .L.4•►T.4 c.: H 4 N 0 ..c.O In N N O c In • c O N In N....1 , v ,_,..v I. t, O,H c. c, c A UI c,C.. 4 c C - U U.. 0 ..00c.I..C•.tflr, 0, O H...,NUA c.r ./ UC•C)InO.O r.r)C...UOr, r, eH n..C.0'4 r.rr,..C)r-, - • O 0.4 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • U T d O O T 00,.. A N -4 m r♦ t • 0.4003 O .O . W0 CJ • .. 0 C: N 1...0 a a a r 4oT N H M T 0 007.4 I n T PC)N a H T in N •n d • IT 4 ..A A...e T Ina) In • • Tnr, 4 .• IA.4.4 T .. M In N U) T. • • • • • see a • • • • • '► • . • • • a . U) ' 0 A•M N. ..C,.♦ A N N In C. •M N.4 e , a a .. M CV ,.4.•• ..N,. CD .4 N .4 : H .O a N n I W • • ss •0 N a 0 c,O c,o o C. C o (=re, c 1a o o C. Co C) •o Co C O CrCO n c: C) C n c.c .-, c,c-0 Ct c '.. C. c,c _ _ ., <, F- n r,C.0 r)C) n C, r, 00 ”,-.0,-, ., 0 C) n r:,C•r O 0 e.,, Ca c O Cr C. r c.G c., c,C.0 ,1.- n ._., 0 ,c, t • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • M NNc,If)MAInN N In C)Cel 1n 001o0 N 'OQC.00In U N O Y') N C, _. re N I-.•H .0.O IC) Cr a r.r. N r....•r•.r•. H 'M n In CI N T IN • ... M • c. .. .n 0 r,..T N N.4 If)N ., PdO NN O.O a'r+' N ....O.TAN 0` O e ClC') It, .t N I• • O w • • • • ♦ • • • •. . ... .• • • • • • .. • ) A OO.H TN OIr) N NN. 0..C,.•T O • PC) ,NN T e CL MN r N In 0.. U).4 O0 M..• • N In N ICI 0 In CO N • .•+ N H N N .. Ir) a. T H H .0 .4 J a • r • Sr a 0 a , I • W • W U 2 cc a t-. W 2> Z • I • I A O a • 2,- • .1 1 a sNNNOr M.,C) 0 un -! MN., nn. .4 C0 r.C,N C).f1r-..11r, Ur.r Tc,nn n -,O r,r. .. -. . H C 0 in N• A r- ....'. •-, N T .-,r•,T Cl".*1) r.. at •N .- CVI n.4 r,,-. .-, , ...' . . 0 r ,• '. . . � - . � •.H •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' • • • • • ••. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 U N 0 0 N N .0 to In T .4 T.O co ,In 01..A.O OO • A N nee Cr 2.IC m N'N• .D • ,• •. O 00c, j N r, n ..t .0 0, I 0 , CJ 4 .7 Li O T!U9 0.O, N COI V) 0'. In .O H.• O co GCV en . er, .. I In • co W • • •t a • • • • • • • I • e a • G _; I N ley In C,4 4 1 N H ! ..N.. T !H 1.4 H .O .. .. • cc 1•[ ! I I I I III I • e I , e a a a s I •I N Z W • WL.li r CC 0 i Z U,- N J I UU. 2 NU I • I 'O W Z O sr W 0 01 U••' 0. M I W r •I 21 N Z�I • I CUr...1...101 I N 2 ECU I a•a141 U1.1 i ,.. UQ O'V) 44-4 UZV)v, I it W W•r » • I C 0.I OC • N i a. 1 1'�'>W Ca Z ' 0. t> •"O O, 1 44 W T C .75 .- I.e. to y a N CC) ►- C >H I 0!n=71►. 0, 2 17 2►f N A U C^ j U Z 2 S W J�N EC tM 2 H 0.' W t-r,G N�. • r; J•'I W U r 1••• r•Cr I 1, �. 0- 0.-P. ..N 0 U N 4 1•I J� 0-4 a �I.1 W JCI!2 a 26 0 ...4(21X00. W 4�>a M • 11. 0 •U M W I-IM •! • Q1V)IL W 0)0. NUM I \ 411 ,..10 1.4 ..1CAU)S - J J Q 41.41.40. ! •-+EC J•• 1.- E W V)ow W 7 ••I J •-Z m►- •( U 2 Z 1.1 U o 1,0 • .J _J-JILL UO Ii. 5 - OC -two. •2 U• CC JO ZQ C •JO I Q 2W0 Z U 0. W V) O 0 tIi o ..4....402 W 0. 0-12. 0 0-. LC me W W.-1W0.0 0 WECP.W V)V) LL. Wv,U .• • CCC LL IL I (L 4. J U W N a a 0•.1 Q 4J"•' M 2$-. 0.M M Q O Y-+f O 2 O L 41 m U)leJ N►-4J Y W if 14 r nrPWt•42r1.- OJ 41K .. 0SOs' 0. > m0. uo O. Wanv)Z al 2 Vl WCII MOMNf- .J U =a Ow V) N.. ZW*C,J U Vl I U) 1I070 V) N 1.14' 4 4. 41 W2W 77 70 •f C. J4. 2WP0 W Cn11. WG• 7_ 7 MWw� N 741 ) 1.1 (.4MCCI Sr PC-J t - C0 0-“-.0.40Z WJ Z W Ua • _100 b. V) (4 ► N -aro ro O s.rwocceam 2 )' J U •- ) 0N4-. 20. C, UU)0)U0. 0 • J I. J4aWN •. • UI• Cct: • mor4u IW 74,11..1►- W041 Q'i atrvec400J Yr N .44. W0.4.0-4..) ..1 0p., 4 Qr41> 22 • a 0UM1.1UN- ..i 1 LL Cn W Y1-••UOU Id .• J W J 0.Z Z a Cr.W U) 4. CC Z r'J S N a a 0 ( U)J a N..Z 0 2 W h-r Ec Z N U(L 0. Z W U O 4l Z'C C)V) 2i 022 4 >a WWw W OZ W U. OWOGWr W = E[4)OWKd' mWECWJ+a44W04LL. 000►.OW a7J•. ►- tnO0aa 0. Z sO a o0orW> >0 H 0. _ia r•-aa as>Uzs (DCO20 WUOJ©L',UUZ a Ctl O (V00.•♦NO ..N 4 OIn)NON•N 4 000..0C..40 .4N0.41NMC).•INM)0C,..Ne'C,.4ICI0 • 2 a...H• d d If` If)en ♦ .•...N N H M)M • f ...I N N M In In .O.O,1O N A N N US,CD EC EC Cf T TT O` T-..NT i R a t dl * N N N N N N I • N N + M H o ff M H H M•.M n H M•M M M M t'7 H M M H M H M n s • d d « `�^` N I.1,•(• • iC • • O - • • . w • r, • • 4 « 744 N N 10.1 N N A 4 n n AA .I 10'1 A A ♦1 r • f 1f f o f o f,i R • !N, A r•. . . A� „ ron c - O- r • e ' c=o C -rvnrv7 . ^ ^ Ci. i:r 'n 1 nC 2 C i3O • r• a a p 2 O ? Oonrr, rn O ti. nnO -ry l';_2 A c_u•n�0_` O - nrv- • n d. . • • i (..l .. . U P. A -• a • • • ' in in T nl (Si -+ W e w 4 U c• l.+c. In C. 0 r. U 0 , n Cl c>P O , u C.. N I CI. 2 Cr ti ,'I Pc, c t c) C- C.�. i• r• e- In C • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • , .4 r1 (Si In In cc CD n CC .a N - 0 c, u n M M T O+ .O • a .o .o (Si N In N m • G T T V. Z. • • • • • • • • • • , • (Si .O .o .+ r. M n (Si (Si n Cis K^ 41 en CO In U, In. N n I T -4 I- , •• i An .4 I a n ac, C,( UI tj UI ,. r r-. a., c1 c, c.,0 o C. C. c.. m U. M 0 C.n N r'. N r r+ 0, c. 00000 0 r. n C n ca. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • U V. V. - "• rn I- 4 M1 nen ' c n T • (V n o .r • h n e a • i 7 0 1..4 r cr c: ,l c• l^ r l., 00 o c. o C 0 b 10 .7 o 0 I- c'.r, n f- 4.1 C. r r1 f, r3 t+ Ci CI rt r, I r, 'I -, c] a • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • N O 0 .O U C7 V G U1 '0 CO CO In or In In n n VI A., T CT a .cI un N N 0 0 o r, T T N O • • • • • • • • • • K .o .o -. .r h M N N . 0 o a. ” .4 es In N In n a .4 n 4 • N ' c U a 0 a. I.I LI U z cc a N re a L.I s4 rr H . I O Z I . ; . r. t I I I 1 I I � I 1.• r J I r. ,n • r. r.r. r. '1. r-, In I O O ..• 1 1 i N •- • •, • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Z U N N •h 20 o Q I I 1 . AI., I I a .o• .e• 1 w• I � , li • U2 I I I , w I i I I . 1 i 61 NI i a I 1 Cif 1 , I 2 1.1 I w 1 i I a cn C I I 0 NI L.1 J N N I N _ i W 0 CC VA Cr W I I J W 2 I CC W I- 4 1=-in 4L LA. I in I i I. a Z, •- 1 I.1 I •, 2 > I in I a 0 C 14. 0: U •-Z IL. O w a. •- z 1-. 0 H I n, I-' 7 cc u a C11 z = u * Y1 -1,-- CC Li W•-' W > LI w CC U u. W n1 4a'1 r I .)tU a C U 7s- '2w VI > Y t 7I CNI 0I- 00 W X a +� 0 CO V) W U U 0 V) 441 O O W W > ONN ON X U 2 Z u.-u •8 1 It I- CC 2 CC O d Z 1.1 W LI 1.1i Jr J.4 J VI L nLI I.1 02V11- C CD CD o C.^I.II • 4 •-• 4Cd a W •..7 Ia. 54aO 1- 2 Z •• O In H J 1-01r- 2 J 4 V) J S 2 N N I- .4 •• > \I L .-.C w.-� •-. W 1.. a>r 2 C U 9 W L) ..... 1.- 1� r- r.H c a >a aI ' a > > Cr a > CC {LJX X 2 2 c-. 2 JCZCa��.yJ1 a 2 W 2W CC Z W WCC W 0 0 • U a U*4UUI U •40 .-.a H ••.L CCU)f CC U U NI OU CL TCr-IC.I 0 4 • .'f • Cl G * CC•O.•.N • -• • WI 2 U c., 0 ,4•4.4 • N • ...... .4 • H f m m@ • T • 01 E a Ir' In O M III * f 2 a` -,• •T T T T CT • rI r . q- N n • n O n • • 2 N n ♦ /I O n O • N N N N N N N N 1•V N p fl A A A 1 2 ,•nl o n A r. A V • • 12 3 2 f t f i P, h f. n n n n of `.�-/ ) , R ► D /1%R 1982 ' i1 CITY OF QH .KOF:EE April 8, 1982 ,,r. Loren Habegger Rural Route 3 Box 66 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Re: Developers Agreement - Halo First Addition Dear Mr. Habegger: You will recall entering into an August 15, 1978, Developers Agreenent with the City of Shakopee, relative to the development of Halo First Addition. As part of that Agreement, your company , Halo Investment, Inc. , was required to build a portion of Bluff Street between a line just west of arshcall Street extended to the westerly line of Halo First Addition, approxioate_ly 215 feet at a copy of approximately $9,000. This was among several requirements imposed upon you by that Developers Agreement. As part of the development of Halo Second Addition, and at your specific request, the City made a specific change order to the contract involving certain construction in Halo Second Addition to include the construction of that portion of Bluff Street required by your Developers Agreement for the First Addition. This was done upon your representation that YOU could speak for the developers. There now seems to be sone question as to whether or not you had that authority. At any rate, the City has made a determination that it chooses not to attennt to assess the cost of that portion of Bluff Street located within the First Addition but rather tends to rely on your obligation under the terms of the Developers Agreement to pay that amount. Consequently, I have been instructed to inform you that with respect to the costs of that rrtion of Bluff Street located within the First Addition, there are three options you have as to how that cost will he handled. They are: 1 . An agreement by all present owners within the Second Addition agreeing to assess the cost against property in the Second Addition. The ow':w s—Would have to waive all hearings and waive their rights to appeal said assessments. 2. Pay the cost of 61uft Street in cash. 3. The cost of Bluff Street will be collected in accordance with the letter of credit provided on your behalf by the Citizens State Bank of Shakopee. You will have ten days from the date of this letter to inform the undersigned which option you choose. Should we fail to hear from you we will assume that option 3 is the only viable option and we will be in contact with Citizens Bank to collect the amounts in question. Thank you. Yours very truly, KRASS, MEYER, KANNING & WALSTEN CHARTEREn Phillip R. Kress P(.K:sr► cc: John Anderson, City Administrator Citizens State an of Shakonee SCOTT COUNTY 4-024 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS RECEIVED w s COURT HOUSE 109 SHAKOPEE, MN. 55379 (612)-445-7750, Ext. 102 APR 71982 WM.KONIARSKI,District 1,Vice-Chairman CITY OF SHAKOPEE ANTHONY WORM,District 2 R.E.MERTZ,District 3 DOUG HAFERMANN,District 4,Chairman ROLAND BOEGEMAN,District 5 April 2, 1982 Mayor Eldon A. Reinke 3071 Hauer Trail Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mayor Reinke: In response to Don Steger' s letter of March 9, 1982, I want to relate to you the feelings of the Scott County Board of Com— missioners, as they were expressed at our meeting of March 30, 1982. The Scott County Board is interested in pursuing coopera— tive land planning ventures that will lead to mutually beneficial land use determinations in the City of Shakopee and in Jackson Township. However, the Board views its participation, and the functioning of the Seven—Member Committee as advisory only. If you plan to pursue the re—activitation of this planning body, please keep this office informed. Sincerely, osi Doug Haf ermanfn Chairman of the Board DH:db cc: J. Ries Jackson Township Board John Anderson, Shakopee City Administrator An Equal Opportunity Employer 1/ 1 M CITY OF SHAKOPEE 6` # =- INCORPORATED 1870 129 E. First Ave. - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1376 (612) 445-3650 • April 8 , 1982 Mrs . Annen 428 E. 2nd Street Shakopee , MN 55379 Dear Mrs . Annen, Regarding your proposed fence , attached is a copy of the City of Shakopee ' s fence Ordinance . On April 7 , 1982 , an engineering person and myself attempted to locate the property pins on your lot for you. We were unable to find them for you. You called and said your son knows where they are. I suggest you have your son locate them and give us a call back to confirm their location. After that is done we will issue a permit for your proposed fence. It is the responsibility of the property owner to find or have the property pins placed before securing a fence permit . If I can be of any further assistance , please feel free to call . Respectfully, LeRoy Houser Building Official LH:cu 1)0 11 //11--a" / ,r2-5 7 '1 5 c a 7 1' h c L, a r1 of I' rol.lr1' ss Valley An Equal Opportunity Employer 'hakupee QIummuuitu 'eruires 401 129 Levee Drive Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone 445-2742 Community Education • Parks • Recreation • Adult Education March 25, 1982 MEMO TO: JOHN ANDERSON FROM George F. Muenchow SUBJECT: Tennis Court Lighting Several of us did meet with the Shakopee Public Utility Commission while they were in session last Monday afternoon including Jr H.S. Principal Ron Ward, Co—Chairperson Sue Marschall and Pat Martens of the Shakopee Tennis Association, and myself. The Commission re—affirmed its policy that the Jr H.S. Tennis Court lights would continue to carry a separate Demand Charge because of standing alone on the school property. The regular commercial rate would apply. The group 's consensus was: 1. Ron Ward would secure information from a recently discovered factory outlet supplier regarding what could be done to adjust the coin meter that operates the lights on the courts. This information would be given to George Muenchow. 2. George Muenchow, with Lou Van Hout 's guidance, would prepare a plan to be presented to the City Council. Funding would be from the Capital Equipment Fund. 3. Increased receipts from the coin meter is intended to cover the cost of this lighting program. Suggested fee would be around $4.00/hr. 4. Leadership in the Tennis Association will work to provide backup funds in case the coin meter does not generate enough funds. 5. A Staff Memo would be prepared for Council prior to the April 6 Meeting. A COOPERATIVE EFFORT OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE AND SCHOOL DISTRICT 720 SINCE 1954 ftMkDpEE Tummunitg1 'Erutke,B 129 Levee Drive Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone 445-2742 Community Education • Parks • Recreation • Adult Education March 25, 1982 MEMO TO: JOHN ANDERSON FROM George F. Muenchow SUBJECT: RIVERSIDE PARK LIGHTS I have talked to Steve O'Neill,Business Manager of the Shakopee Baseball Association, and they completely understand the responsibility that they have to come forward with a funding plan for cost of lighting at the park. This information is to be available to you by the April 20 Council Meeting. He will keep in touch with me. A COOPERATIVE EFFORT OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE AND SCHOOL DISTRICT 720 SINCE 1954 FROM: CITY OF SHAKOPEE TO: 129 East First Ave., Shakopee, MN Zip 55379 Phone (612) 445-3650 Name* 1t-t----- / ' ' '-'- --. SUBJECT: e '`f 2, l� G-!/ , DATE 3--2( __4...._-,--,_____Aew_e___ 14ridt61-/L--- ..11A / , Y n /174,44,31. „..) 7 ligt-- / --Z- ye) t, .i/L:1,7 . aa 0.., ,/,_ 12i706 AJ-- c�... Liv4,25i_ w )4./Li 4 i i ii,44 A., .A.,, ;(4- --, z3CeA., .14./.- 6 ci/pika A I►/. D E r4,4._ 7( v' BY REPLY TO )1:62-- L.,..11/..4 ik...- "et-2 ni/a ii"1" . V-41L- It,: bai ,(}t--- Mj2- C.4*-;- ii4;;W e Dr , / 411-12-- , ff----- >411-P-A---. av‘-/a:- ' ...) t / (A ii6-al / '` cf f 1 c___ gilL(AA/L4Al Wri 192... ..j/ / WA _ or/ 19/ fi(/11/7t- liti'al riA-- )6/41-AV471-- --A----- r/91A,A, , / ,, 0 , 1 717,02.„ aft/a,. „it , . itt k LL ciA-f-tvk ad,/ RETURN PART 1 TO SENDER WITH REPLY BY ( )RMCC 847-3 • tali4 tes3 est `- ,: ,o .eNtee qi3 ''' -- " - -*;"'t_ -3TAil - , - - - N.N.N \ : ' -- - - ‘ 41t-iiii-Z Tk.,..,_ -,.. -,- . ' - t. *4,44r;. 4ctea �=N kl) , , t. ‘,......., r. -. tli .. fill. a.*-'* :''''' .- - __s,_ ,_, ...... ,, _... . 't-rj1., . . . , ‘t 1 ,, . _...„ _ . - ... _ _. .:_ ,sN, - , ......!1.4:1 ,.. : _. ,.,,,a‘,.,,i:,_,,,,,_. ,.„ _.„,t,:.41&,. .1 _,____.:7,..„.r.::---11111-k:_7..-._.:1"tri-•,:,.\'-, -1-_-„,.,.:."141„`'".7'_-•;_:-_ . , . Ito- ..._.....1=.........iisys...... , % _ , : * .. .. .. . ...tx, ,t` .i- Tic . :. _..7*'*\,„_-___-_ - : _ .,.crt, ,-,-„, k,,,, , . ._ ,_ • .,..,; ,___ .:.-q„...1... ,,,,,sy .... ..: :..,.:,..„,..„_, ,,,,,,:_ ... ,ji,t ,,,,,t,,_ • } i 'V � " - } Ittkait (fUEUUW Wit T ) I er�liCE 129 Levee Drive Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone 445-2742 Community Education • Parks • Recreation • Adult Education George F. Muenchow, Dir. 4/13/82 Jack Cole: Regarding Tennis Court Lighting the City Of Shakopee will pay for the cost of installation of a new timer. The Utilities Commission will install. This is per the information received from Kon Ward. The Tennis Association would guarantee any difference between revenue and actual billing. A new wrinkle has emerged as indi • - cated on the attached memo. The Utilities Commission at its meeting April 5 reversed its previous decision and agreed to allow a waiver for Demand Charges at that site for after 9:00 PM daily. We now have a new ball game that should be very workable. This note is intended to provide any and all notification to the School District through you of what is being planned for this facility which is owned and operated by the District. If this is incorrect or if we are moving prematurely, please let me know. C.C. : John Anderson George F. Muenchow A COOPERATIVE EFFORT OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE AND SCHOOL DISTRICT 720 SINCE 1954 FROM: SHAKOPEE TO: Fe /'L PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 1030 East Fourth Avenue SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 (612) 445-1988 Name: SUBJECT: iviviS 6 v.er- 6/71 /L/L., DATE 11—r—e "- Aif i C "O , i'tom iti°j=am f a j7'ilt�% Motion by Bishop, seconded by Reinke that the tennis court lighting be regulated by the new coin meters and since the time that they will be in operation will be after 9 :00 P.M. and not interfere with our peak demand hour .that the demand rate be temporarily dropped and that the Community Services wll be billed at the small commercial rate for the electricity and that the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission if asked will install at the community services expense oththe l new coin meters. Also that the Shakopee Public Utilities may install a or a time clock to insure the 9:00 P.M. on time. Motion carried. e,-9/"/ : ,i ;"Pe) o •, r' t.:� ROM: ;, SHAKOPE TO: F PUBLIC UT ; ES COMMISSION 153o East Fourth Avenue SHAKOPE_E, MN 55379 (B 2) 445-:988 SUBJECT. ' '1//vr.k ;'% '` '% A 6,, DATE 17/- (114'<) 71..( 4'<) C'�c x`c °+�".- 4/7 ? 7/5/(. GG c)!YJ,o/A/62 Mt= DATE 4/13/82 BY George F. Muenchow Lou: This is good news. Attached is the information from Ron Ward re: a new timer. Please order and install as soon as possible. The City will pay the costs. C.C.: John Anderson Jack Cole �r � BY etI VI r9Vv (c'"')RMCC 847-3 o! -A; ;VIII ," . APR 121982 /3 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES C1 OF S " �'OPEE WASHINGTON, D. C. 20515 BILL FRENZEL THIRD DISTRICT MINNESOTA April 8, 1982 Mr. John Anderson City Manager 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Mr. Anderson: Thank you for meeting with Craig Shaver of my staff. I am anxious to serve the residents of Shakopee and learn more about your community. Should you have any questions or matters which require my attention, please contact me. Your assistance in helping me in this transition is much appreciated. Yours very truly, Bill Frenzel Member of Congress BF:cs Enclosure SUBJECT ASSIGNMENTS 10/81 CHRIS BISHOP MARLYS NELSON Education Arts and Humanities Child Nutrition Student Loan Casework DAVE ROSENAUER Endangered Species Health Care Gold Alcohol & Drug Abuse Insurance (Private) Medicaid Pensions (IRA, Keogh, ESOP) Me4icare Small Business Refugees OSHA, Regulatory Tourism Reform Vista Social Security Taxes PAT BROWNE Casework Full Ways & Means Committee Tax issues Senior Citizens (Diane-time permitting) Miscellaneous Revenue Measures Subcommittee Aging programs SSI CRAIG SHAVER Tuition Tax Credits Welfare Banking, Savings & Loans, SEC Communications PAT EVELAND House Administration Committee (Monitor) Campaign Law Population/Family Planning Voter Registration Smoking Voting Rights Act Trade Housing (including casework) Customs Labor/Unemployment/CETA Export promotion/incentives Transportation Export license cases ' ITC cases KAREN ULANS Japan Task Force MFN / MTN Agriculture Reorganization Commodities & Futures Women's Issues Land Use Abortion World Hunger Domestic Violence Agriculture Transportation (St. Lawrence Seaway) ERA American Indians Food Stamps ELLEN GUIDERA Franking Privilege Postal Service Economy/Federal Budget Newsletter comments/issues Energy Reform Issues Environment Cong. reform/Financial disclosure Foreign Policy (Central & So. America only) Hatch Act/Lobby disclosure Natural Resources Public Works DIANE WATKINS Revenue Sharing District of Columbia (time permitting) BOB JACOB Newsletter :.;dress change, additions, deletions Senior Citizens (time permitting) Defense (including MIA' s & Draft) Foreign Policy (except Central & So. America) INTERNS Immigration Policy Judicial Issues Federal Holidays Crime, Gun Control Metric System LEAA, Penal Reform Miscellaneous Issues Drugs & Chemical Abuse (Criminal) Peace Corps Privacy, Freedom of Information U. S. Intelligence Activities Veterans/Civil Service f OFFICERS: 7 i� Robert W. Larson, Chairperson 1:L17-.11" ; � � -,, Donald J. Sandeen, Vice Chairperson James F. Lord, Treasurer 1or C. Mike F. Lord, T assureExecutive Director / public employees retirement association APR 61982 PLEASE PLEASE POST CONGRATULATIONS! ! ! POST Your efforts and participation in this year's legislative process have resulted in many changes for PERA. Most notable of course, was the Governor's signing of H. F. 1625 "The Rule of 90. " As you know, this new rule allows an individual to retire as soon as his service credit and age equal 90. Also included in this legislation is a lessening of the actuarial reduction for early retirement by approximately one-half of the previous reduction. These important changes will be effective July 1, 1982. Additional changes are explained in the attached bulletin. For those of you who made a phone call, wrote a letter, or spoke to someone about this bill, your effort was effective. You can feel assured that you played an integral part in the passage of this legislation. Once again, thank you sincerely, CC, ?' 7q` .� t C. Mike McLaren Executive Director 203 capitol square building 550 cedar street st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 296-7460 2 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION 203 Capitol Square Building 550 Cedar Street PLEASE St. Paul , Minnesota 55101 PLEASE POST Telephone (612) 296-7460 POST April 1 , 1982 NOTICE - 1982 PERA AMENDMENTS TOS, DEPARTMENT HEADS Changes in Minnesota laws affecting PERA are contained in Laws 1982, Chapters 404, 424, 449, 519 and 578. An explanation of the changes in the law which are of general interest follows: Section Subdi- Amended vision Explanation Major Changes in Benefits 353.30 la Any person whose attained age plus credited allowable service totals 90 is eligible for a retirement annuity without reduction because of age (effective July 1 , 1982) . (Chapter 519) 353.30 1 The reduction in annuity for any person retiring between ages 58 and 65 with at least 20 years of service credit has been changed from an actuarial reduction to a reduction of 1/4% for each month under age 65 (effective July 1 , 1982) . (Chapter 519) 353.30 lc The reduction in annuity for any person retiring between ages 62 and 65 with at least 10 years of credited allowable service has been changed from an actuarial reduction to a reduction of 1/4% for each month under age 65 (effective July 1 , 1982) . (Chapter 519) 353.31 1 The maximum monthly family survivor benefit has been increased to $700 from the current $450 per month (effective March 23, 1982) . (Chapter 578) Other Changes in the Law 353.01 12 "Temporary layoff" is limited to three months rather than the three and one-half months currently in the law (effective July 1 , 1982) . (Chapter 404) 353.01 16 (4) Service credit is limited to one year for each period of sick leave of absence without pay (effective July 1 , 1982) . (Chapter 404) 353.01 16 (5) After June 30, 1983, payment for military leave of absence must be made within five years after the date of discharge from mil- itary service (effective July 1 , 1982) . (Chapter 404) Page 2 1982 PERA AMENDMENTS Section Subdi- Amended vision Explanation 353.27 4 Members' names on the salary deduction reports are to be listed in alphabetical order (effective July 1 , 1982) . (Chapter 404) 354.35 Repayment of refunds after again being a member for 18 months must be made within three months from the last date of termina- tion of public service rather than the current requirement that payment must be made before termination of public service (effective July 1 , 1982) . (Chapter 404) 353.36 2 The right to make a buy-back to become eligible for a retirement annuity will not be available to persons who terminate public service July 1 , 1982, or later (effective July 1 , 1982) . (Chapter 404) 353.657 2a The 50% joint and survivor annuity will be available to the sur- vivor of a deceased member of the Police and Fire Fund who had attained the age of 55 and had at least 10 years of credit in the Police and Fire Fund at the time of death (effective July 1 , 1982) . The current law requires 20 years of allowable service credit. (Chapter 404) 356.301 1 Eligibility for disability benefit is now based on service covered by any Minnesota public pension plan, other than volunteer fire- fighters, but calculation of the benefit will be based only on the service in the fund by which the member is covered at the time of disability (effective March 19, 1982) . (Chapter 449) 356.60 1 The 40-year limitation on which an annuity can be based was repealed (effective March 23, 1982) . (Chapter 578) 356.61 The monthly annuity is limited to 100% of the final monthly salary (effective March 23, 1982). (Chapter 578) --- A savings provision was made for those persons who retired after April 6, 1978, the date that the 40-year limitation took effect, and the annuities of those persons affected by this limitation will be refigured (effective March 23, 1982) . (Chapter 578) /5 L' MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE POLICE COMMISSION - 1982 c:'1: SHAKOPEE Minutes of the meeting of March 3, 1982 Meeting called to order by Chairperson Virgil Mears at 4:05 P.M. Members present: Commissioner Virgil Mears, Commissioner Dan Steil, Commissioner Stan Dircks and Police Chief Tom Brownell . Members absent: None 1 . Mr. Mears summarized the letter that was sent out to non-profit organizations in regards to the Shakopee Criminal Apprehension Fund which has recently been organized. Mr. Mears also stated that a follow-up letter will be sent to those organizations listed. At the present time the Apprehension Fund has approxi- mately $3,000.00 in initial pledges. 2. Police Chief Brownell has set up the accounts for the Shakopee Criminal Apprehension Fund and has established a separate post office box. Again, all various groups will be recontacted and the business will also be contacted. Mr. Mears and Mr. Brownell will mail the follow-up letter and will follow through on the responses. 3 . The initial meeting for the Board of Directors of the Shakopee Criminal Apprehension Fund will be held at 7:00 P.M. on April 6, 1982. That meeting will be held at the police building and will be the Crime Prevention organizational meeting. 4. There was an election of officers for the Shakopee Police Commission and Mr. Mears was nominated and approved as Chairman and Mr. Steil was nominated and approved as Secretary. Both will serve one year at those positions. 5. Motion to adjourn was made at 4:39 P.M. Daniel G. Steil March 29, 1982 • MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (Regular Meeting) The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in regular session on March 15, 1982 at 4:30 P.M. in the Utilities Meeting Room. Commissioner Bishop offered a prayer for divine guidance in the deliberations of the Commission. - MEMBER PRESENT: Commissioners Bishop, Reinke and Nolting. Also Liaison Wampach, Manager Van Hout and Superintendent Leaveck. Also present were Barry Kirchmeier, LeRoy Houser, building inspector and John Anderson, City Administrator. Motion by Bishop, seconded by Nolting that Manager Van Hout be directed to send whomever he decides to the water school on March 30, 1981. Motion carried Motion by Nolting, seconded by Bishop that the Utility Manager attend the Minnesota Utility Contractors Association meeting to be held in Hamel. ' Motion carried. Motion by Nolting, seconded by Bishop, in regard to the Chard Addition that we require Mr. Chard to comply to the City ordinance that they must have street lighting in any new development and this must be taken care of at the same time or before we make any further utility installations in this development. Motion carried. LeRoy Houser made some comments regarding water usage by industrial customers for cooling. Discussion followed. Manager Van Hout advised the commission that the Howe Chemical Company water system would be checked in the near future for potential problems. The content of letters to developers concerning available fire flows was discussed. • Motion by Bishop, seconded by Reinke to offer Resolution #240 to repeal Resolution #230. A Resolution adopting watermain and service line specifications. Ayes: Commissioners Bishop, Nolting and Reinke. Nayes: none. Resolution passed. Motion carried. Motion by Reinke, seconded by Nolting that the Commission adopt Resolution #241, A Resolution stating Customer service policies. Ayes: Commissioners Bishop, Reinke and Nolting. Nayes: none. Resolution passed. Motion carried. Ron Ward was present to discuss electric cost at the tennis courts. Motion by Nolting, seconded by Reinke, that the electric service. in the Lake O'Dowd lake area be billed at the residential rate. If they do not use enough electricity to pay for the line charge then they should be charged $150.00 for the installation of the line and the pole to the location. Motion carried. Motion by Reinke, seconded by Bishop that the minutes of the February 1, 1982 regular meeting and the March 8, 1982 special meeting be approved as kept. Commissioner Nolting abstained from vote because he was not present at either meeting. Motion by Reinke, seconded by Nolting that the trunk water charges for 1982 reflect as per the construction index to be $480.44 per acre. Motion carried. Motion by Nolting, seconded by Reinke that we table the Resolution #239 in favor of the City of Anoka over the Hennepin County Park Reserve regarding the Coon Rapids Dam at this time. Motion carried. The existing electric line along the Viking Steel road was discussed. The consensus was that SPUC should avoid being involved in the question of the roads legality. Superintendent Leaveck reported that there were no fire calls and no lost time accidents for the month of February, 1982. Motion by Bishop seconded by Nolting that the April meeting be held on the 5th. at 4:30 P.M. in the Utilities Meeting Room. Motion carried. Motion by Bishop, seconded by Reinke that since we are paying in excess of the $240,000.00 floor that the wording of the formul'a - gross sales be defined as electricity to customers and water to customers. Motion carried. Manager Van Hout asked if connection charges, rentals, penalties, _charges and interest income be included in this definition. Of those questioned, the only item which should be included in the definition should be penalties. Motion by Reinke, seconded by Nolting that the meeting be adjourned. Motion carried. • ,/ Lou Van Hout, Utilities Manager 16' RESOLUTION #242 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND WATER HEATING SERVICES ALSO SERVICE FOR SENIOR CITIZENS AND LARGE-GENERAL SERVICE-LARGE INDUSTRIAL SERVICE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION at meeting duly assembled on the 22 day of March, 1982, that Resolutions #218 nad #219 are hereby repealed, and that the following electric rates shall be and hereby are established for all customers of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission, City of Shakopee as follows: Section I: RESIDENTIAL SERVICE: (re) Availibility: Residential dwellings First 50 KWH @ 6.34 per KWH Next 50 KWH @ 6.04 per KWH Next 400 KWH @ 5.74 per KWH Next 500 KWH @ 5.24 per KWH Excess KWH @ 4.54 per KWH Plus power adjustment charges on all KWH Minimum bill $3.00 per month Section II: COMMERCIAL SERVICE: (cs) Availibilty: Non-residential customers with less that 15KW Demand First 50 KWH @ 11.54 per KWH Next 50 KWH @ 7.2 per KWH Excess KWH @ 5.0 per KWH Plus power adjustment charges on all KWH Minimum monthly bill shall be the greater of: 1) . One dollar ($1.00) per KWH of installed three phase capacity for the first 7 plus fifty cents ($.50) per KVA for each additional or 2) . $3.50 Section III: RESIDENTIAL WATER HEATING (CLOSED) Availibility: Existing installations only All KWH @ 5.24 per KWH Plus power adjustment charges on all KWH The minimum monthly bill for water heating service is $2.50. Section IV: SERVICE FOR SENIOR CITIZENS: Availibility: Residential dwelling occupied by senior citizens First 100 KWH @ 5.54 per KWH Next 900 KWH @ 5.24 per KWH Excess KWH @ 4.54 per KWH Plus power adjustment charges on all KWH Minimum monthly bill $2.50 Section V: LARGE GENERAL SERVICE: Availibility: Non-residential customers with demand of 15KW and over The monthly bill shall be the sum of the demand, energy, and power adjustment charges calculated according to the following schedule: DEMAND CHARGE: First 50 KW of billing demand $6.00 KW per month All over 50 KW of billing demand $5.30 per KW ENERGY CHARGE: All KWH per month 2 454 per KWH Plus power adjustment charges on all KWH Minimum monthly bill The demand charge Determination of billing Demand: The billing demand shall be the customer's greatest 15 minute demand in kilowatts, incurred during the month for which the bill is rendered, but not less than 60% of the highest billing demand during the preceding 11 months of 15KW, whichever is greater. Section VI: LARGE GENERAL SERVICE WITH POWER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: Availibility: Non-residential customers with demands in excess of 150 KW The monthly bill shall be the sum of the demand, energy and power adjustment charges calculated according to the following schedule. The billing demand shall be as described in this section. DEMAND CHARGE: First 50 KWH of billing demand $5.70 per KW All over 50 KWH of billing demand $5.00 per KW ENERGY CHARGE: All KWH per month 2.45per KWH Plus power adjustment charges on all KWH Minimum monthly bill The Demand Charge Determination of billing Demand: The billing demand shall be the customer's greatest 15 minute demand in kilowatts, incurred during the month for which the bill is rendered, but not less that 60% of the highest billing demand during the preceding 11 months or 15KW, whichever is greater. The customer agrees to maintain an average power factor at or above 90%. If the average power factor is less that 90% lagging, the billing _demand' shall be adjusted by'multiplying the actual 15 minute demand measured during the month by the ratio of 90% to the average power factor expressed in percent. Average Power Factor: The average power factor is defined to be the quotient obtained by dividing the KWH used during the month by the square root of the sum of the squares of the KWH used and the lagging reactive ]: lovolt-ampere-hours supplied during the same period. Any leading kilovolt-ampere-hours supplied during the period will not be considered in determining the average power factor. Section VII: LARGE INDUSTRIAL SERVICE: Availibility: Non-residential customer with demand of 1000KW and over The monthly bill shall be the sum of the demand and energy charges calculated according to the following schedule: DEMAND CHARGE: First 100 KVA of billing demand $5.00 per KVA All over 100 KVA of billing demand $4.70 per KVA ENERGY CHARGE: All KWH per month 2.45 per KWH Minimum monthly bill The demand charge Determination of billing demand: The billing demand in kilovolt-ampere will be determined by dividing the maximum demand in kilowatts by the monthly average power factor and will be rounded to the nearest whole KVA. Billed demand in any one month shall be the larger of the following: 1) . 60% of the greatest demand in KVA billed during the preceding eleven months. 2) . 1000 KVA Average power factor: The average power factor is defined to be the quotient obtained by dividing the KWH used during the month by the square root of the sum of the squares of the KWH used and the lagging reactive kilovolt- ampere-hours supplied during the same period. Any leading kilovolt- ampere-hours supplied during the period will not be considered in determining the average power factor. Section VIII: THE FOLLOWING CLAUSES APPLY TO ALL RATES PRIMARY METERING: At the option of the electric department, secondary voltage service hereunder may be metered at the primary voltage, in which case a 2% cash discount will be allowed on the amount of the monthly bill. PRIMARY VOLTAGE SERVICE: If the customer agrees to take service at the primary voltage available at his location and to pay all costs incurred in the ownership, operation and maintenance of transformers and sub- station equipment (except meters) with service to be metered at the primary voltage, a cash discount of 5% will be allowed on the amount of the monthly bill. AVERAGE POWER FACTOR: The average power factor is defined to be the quotient obtained by dividing the KWH used during the month by the square root of the sum of the squares of the KWH used and the lagging reative kilovolt-ampere-hours supplied during the same period. Any leading kilovolt-ampere-hours supplied during the period will , not be considered in determining the average power factor. POWER ADJUSTMENT: There may be added to or deducted from the monthly bill a Power Adjustment charge, as set by the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission Resolution. MINIMUM POWER FACTOR REQUIREMENT: The customer must maintain an average power factor not less than. 80% lagging. And to avoid leading power factors at any time. PROMPT PAYMENT PROVISION: A penalty of 5% shall be added to the current bill if not paid on or before the 15th. of the month following the date of billing. A charge of $15.00 will be collected resuming service that has been discontinued for non-payment. A charge of $10.00 will be collected if serviceman is sent to collect the payment only. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said adjustment is to become effective from and after March 15, 1982 for the May 1982 billing and all subsequent billings thereof; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all things necessary to carry out the terms and purpose of the Resolution are hereby authorized and performed. Passed in special session of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission this 22nd. day of March, 1982. (C647/' President, Wall Bishop j/4 ATTEST: V f- . /, 71/ Manager, Lou Van Hout 1 RESOLUTION #243 AMENDING RESOLUTION #219 THE ADDITION OF A POWER ADJUSTMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission on the 22nd day of March, 1982, that Resolution 219 be repealed, and that a power adjustment charge be applied to all electric energy sold to recover the increased costs of purchased power and that said charge shall be applied at a constant rate to each kilowatt hour of energy sold; and which rate shall be adjusted monthly to be the sum of 25% of the _quantity for each of the previous four months; which quantity is equal to the actual increase in the cost of purchased power, over and above the base costs before fuel cost adjustment, of the wholesale rate (Eighth revised Schedule A tariff sheet No. 368) effective October 3, 1981. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this adjustment shall apply for all energy used beginning March 15, 1982. BE ,IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all things necessary to carry out the terms and purpose of this resolution are hereby authorized and performed. Passed in special session of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission this 22nd day of March, 1982. rs /(/) . ; // . A, 49 President, Wally '3ishop (_./ ATTEST: ,..-X: _ I ‘.4-e„--7//4-74--d ,1 Manager, Lou Van Hout /9' MEMO TO : John K . Anderson City Administrator FROM: Don Steger City Planner RE: Action Items of Planning Commission April 15, 1982 DATE: April 16, 1982 Pursuant to the request by City Council to be kept apprised of action items of the Planning Commission and/or Board of Adjustments and Appeals, the following item was acted upon : The request from David Wiggin, Wiggin, Inc. , for a 20 foot front yard and a 5 foot side yard variance from setback requirements for Lots 1-3, Blk. 1, Minnesota Valley 5th Addition and Lots 1-8, Blk. 1, Minnesota Valley 6th Addition, was denied by the Shakopee Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Please see attached Variance Resolution No. 299. jiw Attachment VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO. 299 WHEREAS, David Wiggin of Wiggin, Inc . having first filed an application, for an appeal to the Board of AdjustmentsAppeals dated April 1 ' 1982 , for a variance from the strict application of the provisions of the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance, to wit : 20 foot front yard and 5 foot side yard variances from setback requirements ; and WHEREAS, the property upon which the request is being made is described as follows: Lots 1, 2, & 3 , Block 1, Minnesota Valley 5th Addition and Lots 1 - 8 , Block 1, Minnesota Valley 6th Addition ; and WHEREAS, said proposed variance is for property presently zoned as R-4 (Multi-Family Residential) ; and WHEREAS, upon hearing the advice and recommendation of the City Planner and upon considering the suggestions and objections raised by the affected property owners within a radius of 350 feet thereof in a public hearing duly held thereon; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SHAKOPEE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA that the aforementioned variance be and is hereby: DENIED pursuant to: Shakopee City Code Section 11. 04, Subd. 5A, the following numbered items: Item No. 1 : Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property -77Fich do not apply generally fo other properties in the same zOne Or vitriTilty;a7R1-- result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of property since enactmen o is ap ur ave a• no con o ; • Item No. 2: The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Chapter would -deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under th,! terms of this Chapter; and Item No. 3: That the special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions ot the applicant; and lte- No. 4: That granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any ec aI privilege that is denied by thi Chapter-To owner S of-cttrer lands, atrt.crures or buildings in the same district; and _item _ • • 6 - • - -6 esif.d is the minimum variances which would alleviate the hardship. Adopted in REGULAR session of the Shakopee Board of Adjustments and Appeals held this 15th day of April , 19 82. C 4-4 : * man o 0 Boar, of Adjustments and Appeals ATTEST : - I -------- a -A ity Planner 1 /82 - TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ .REG.SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APRIL 20, 1982 ELdon Reinke presiding 1] Roll Call at 7 :00 P.M. 2] 7 :00-7:45 P.M. - Joint meeting between the City Council and the Cable Communications Committee a] Determination of order of presentations by cable companies at the public hearing b] Staff update c] Presentation by consultant on final evaluation report 3] Approve Minutes of March 30, 1982 4] Communications: a] Rubber Industries, Inc . re: invitation to visit facilities / b] St. Francis Hospital re : request for vacation of Atwood btwn 4th and 5th Avenues c] Capesius Agency, Inc . re: Open House d] State of Mn. Dep ' t. of Public Safety re: request for "No Parking" signs e] League of Mn. Cities re : candidates for Board of Directors f] National League of Cities re : Antitrust Legislation-The Boulder Decision g] Association of Metro Municipalities re : Surface Water Management h] Eric Rehm re: damage to trees 5] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 6] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS : 7] Old Business: a] Shakopee Senior Citizen Center Director: b] Shakopee Baseball Association - discussion c] Request for vacation of alley North of Lots 1&2, Block 30 OSP d] Revisions to Developer' s Agreement e] Levee Drive Park Grant - Approval of Preliminary Application f] Firemen' s Annual Physicals 8] Planning Commission Recommendations: None 9] Resolutions and Ordinances : a] Res. no. 1997, Accepting Work on the 80-2 Eastview 1st Add 'n. b] Res. No. 2000, Approving Plans and Specs & Ordering Ad for Bids for Valley Industrial Boulevard South 82-2 c] Res. No. 1999, Declaring Adequacy of Petition and Ordering Preparation of Report for Roadway Serving Lots of Record East of CR89 in NE % of 13-115-22W d] Res. No. 1995, Authorizing the Disposal of Unclaimed Property e] Res. No. 1998, Deferring 1982 Payable Special Assessments on Property Designated "Green Acres" 10] New Business : a] 8 :30 P.M. PUBLIC HEMING - Proposed Uses of Revenue Sharing Funds b] 1981 Annual Report c] Grants Available to the City of Shakopee - discussion d] Developers Agreement for Minnesota Valley 6th Addition e] Policy on Garbage Service Refunds f] Levee Drive Improvements - Res. No. 1993, Receiving Report and Setting Public Hearing g] Turn Back of Part of Trunk Hwy 187 Renumbered 101 to City , h] Reapportionment of Precincts in Shakopee i] Subdivision Requirements in Relationship to the cost of public services for housing j ] Move that the bills in the total amount of $169, 690.79 be allowed and ordered paid TENTATIVE AGENDA April 20, 1982 Page -2- 11] Consent Business : a] Valleyfair Anhual Fee Agreement b] Roof Drains, Public Service Building c] Library HV/AC System d] Authorize Payment to Arcon Construction Co. , Inc . in amount of $3,084.40 12] Other Business : a] Board of Equalization (June 8th, 9th, and 15th) b] Tentative date for joint meeting with School Board, Community Services Board and City Council is Monday, May 24th at 7 :30 P .M. c] d] e] 13] Adjourn to Tuesday, April 27th at 7 :00 P .M. John K. Anderson City Administrator MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre , Administrative Assistant RE: Cable Presentation DATE: April 15 ,. 1982 Introduction According to the "Schedule for Cable Franchise Award" adopted by the City Council , a presentation by the cable consultant on her final report is planned for the April 20 , 1982 City Council meet- ing. The public hearing on cable communications has been set for April 27 , 1982 , at the Shakopee Senior High School Cafeteria . Background FINAL REPORT AND PRESENTATION The City previously expected to have the final consultant report by April 15 , 1982 . Due to delays in getting all appropriate infor- mation and analyzing the resulting proposals , the report will not be available until Tuesday, April 20, 1982 , at the City Council meeting. City staff decided to go ahead with the consultant pre- sentation even though the Council and Committee will not be able to review the report in advance of the meeting. Consultant Benda will present highlights of her report and address questions and clarifications elicited by her -presentation at the meeting. After reading the report , Council and Committee members should present additional questions they have to me by Friday, April 23 , 1982 ( 8 :00 a.m. ) . The subsequent course of action will then be decided based on the number and nature of the questions . Possible alter- natives include : 1 . Call a special meeting on Monday, April 26 , 1982 , at 8:00 p.m. for Ms . Benda to address the questions . 2 . Request Ms . Benda to provide written response to all questions , to be distributed to the Committee and Council prior to the public hearing, (contingent on availability of all the team members ) . 3 . Have Ms . Benda answer the questions at the public hearing. Opinions on the best alternative are solicited. ATTENDANCE OF WASHINGTON CONSULTANTS The City Council must also address the issue of whether other mem- bers of the CTIC Associates team should be present at the public hearing. Neither Ann Muller, technical , or Martin Buttcock, finan- cial , has been scheduled to attend the April 20 , 1982 meeting. Both will be available to address questions by phone on April 20th, or can provide written responses to questions raised by Council or Committee prior to the meeting. Both Ann and Martin would be avail- John K. Anderson 2 Page Two April 15 , 1982 able to attend the public hearing at a total cost of approximately $2 ,000 above the current $13 ,200 contract . Alternately they could be available for telephone questions . Through March, Ms . Benda has billed approximately $6 ,400 toward the $13 ,200 contract limit . The billing to date includes work on the preliminary report , but not the final . ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED Enclosed are copies of additional correspondence received since March 30 , 1982 regarding cable communications : 1 . April 6 , 1982 letter from Progress Valley Totalvision providing alternate site selection and additional comments . 2 . April 7 , 1982 letter from Progress Valley Totalvision (PVT) re- sponding to Zylstra Communication Corporation request to dis- qualify the PVT proposal . 3 . Letter from Adrian Herbst outlining recent changes in Minnesota Statutes relating to cable. This correspondence is submitted for information only, no action is necessary. Questions to Address 1 . Consensus by Council and Committee on how to handle additional questions for consultant , by special meeting Monday night , written response by consultant or at the public hearing. 2 . Consensus by Council and Committee on whether Washington consul- tants should attend April 27th public hearing or alternate option. JA/jms MEMO TO: Shakopee Planning Commission FROM: Don Steger, City Planner RE: Cable TV Head-in Facilities DATE: April 1, 1982 Two Cable TV firms are in the process of bidding for the City ' s Cable TV franchise. A site is needed for the Cable TV head-in facilities which consist of a tower (up to 100 feet in height ) , an earth-based satellite receiving dish(es) (approximately 12 feet diameter) , and a building containing equipment and/or a studio and/or an office. The Zoning Ordinance permits essential services in all zoning districts, however, it states that essential services structures are only allowed in the B-2 Community Business District as a conditional use. In reviewing this deficiency in the Zoning Ordinance, several staff persons concurred that an interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance is necessary (John Anderson, City Adminis- trator; Jeanne Andre, Cable TV staff person; and myself) . The staff has agreed that the following interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance is in order : 1) Light industrial District , I- l : Permitted use; Ordinance contains no height limitation • in this zone. 2) Heavy Industrial District, I-2 : Permitted use; a Conditional Use Permit is required if tower is over 45 feet in height . 3) Agriculture District , AG: Conditional use; Ordinance exempts height limit- ation for TV towers in this Zone . 4 ) Community Business District , B-2 : Conditional use; Ordinance contains height limitation for structures in this zone. The staff concurred that the Industrial Districts are the most logical locations for the head-in facilities due to the nature of the land uses . The Agricultural areas also seemed reasonable to accommodate the facilities because of the widely sep- arated land uses . A Conditional Use Permit would be required in Agricultural Districts to ensure no infringement on farmsteads. A Conditional Use Permit would also be rquired in the B-2 Zone Shakopee Planning mission April 1, 1982 Cable TV Page -2- because this is clearly stated in the Ordinance. it was agreed that it would be totally inappropriate to locate the head-in facilities in any Residential Zone and in the remaining Commercial Zones ; downtown or highway Commercial areas. This memo is Intended to be information so that the Planning Commission is fully aware of how the Cable TV head-in facilities are being handled. DS/j iw Planning Commission Action of April 15, 1982: The Planning Commission concurred with staff's recommendation of the Zoning Ordinance. CSA RAI r 9 EUEIllai_ -1_ _ U ,N R ] E o_ g _ UoiLA Box 777, Hector, Minnesota 55342 Telephone 612 848-6231 April 6 , 1982 Ms . Jeanne Andre Administrative Assistant City of Shakopee 129 E. First Ave . Shakopee , Minnesota 55379-1376 Dear Ms . Andre : After the meeting last week with the City Council , the cable committee and the consultant , you asked that the additional information clarifying our headend site and other comments be delivered to you by April 7 , 1982 . I am enclos- ing for your information a legal description of the headend site and I am marking the map that we submitted in our original proposal with the new site . I have some additional comments that I would like cleared up before the April 20 , 1982 meeting . Our Regional Channel , Channel 6 , will also be available to our Universal subscribers . This is accomplished by an ABC Switch which is manufactured by RMS Electronics Inc . , Model #ACS-6 or equivalent . The security between the "A" cable and "B" cable is accomplished by a Vitek Trap, (bandpass channel 6 only ) . Our Public Access Channel will be on Channel 8 of the "B" cable full time and our Government Access will be on Channel 12 of the "B" cable full time. Why is Progress Valley only credited with $87 , 000 in Table VI-7 , Page A-29 in the Preliminary Report on Access and Local Origination Production Facilities and Support , when in fact , our proposal shows $133 ,000 in Form K? What was incorrect with Form I , Page 29 from our proposal? In Table V-8 , Page A-20 of the Preliminary Report why can ' t these figures be verified? Suttle Apparatus Corporation-Minnesota Division Communications Systems Services, Inc. North American Communications Corporation Arrowhead Communications Corporation Cable Spinning Equipment Compar Cable Communications Systems,Inc. North American Communications,Inc, Bottle International Corporation Northland Cable TV Division Eagle Valley Telephone Company Suttle Apparatus Corporation: Suttle Equipment Division Indianhead Telephone Company BottleCaribe,Inca Rapids Cable TV,inc. Pine Island Telephone Company Tel Products,Inc. Roart Plastics,Inc. Page 2 Ms . Jeanne Andre April 6 , 1982 In conclusion , maybe there is a simple explanation to my questions , but I would like to know the answers to the above questions prior to the final evaluation report . Thank you , Sincerely, () Arlen Muenzhuber Vice President and General Manager North American Communications Corporation AM : ts Enclosures cc : Anita Benda Communications Projects 1403 Jefferson Avenue St . Paul , Minnesota 55105 Ann Muller CTIC Associates , Inc . 1800 N. Kent , Suite 1007 Arlington , Virginia 22209 fi °lg b t .,..j. ' Suttle Apparatus Corporation-Minnesota Division Communications Systems Services,Inc. i. North American Communications Corporation Arrowhead Communications Corporation Cable Spinning Equipment Company C bie Cer m mnicattons Systems,Inc. North American Communications,Inc. Suttle International Corporatii .,a �' - �-:�+rtF;land Cable TV Ctivisio Eagle Valley Telephone Compan: :Suttle Apparatus Corporati. ttie.Cquiiment Divislo Indianhead Telephone Company Bottle Caribe,Inc ; '.4eT'V,i Pine Island Telephone Company Tel Prnducts,Inc 1 ....r Ics 1nd.; V.,_,--____------A. ___, ______________----- ________-- 1 ___ , _ , --\ ------1 .1:30\tiL__11cA . ri c- 7 1 ___r--1 .,..-S- 0 1,...,1- tr_-_-:_ .---.k 1 i 1 v., , ,----113...\_) \ 3-L_IV:Sri: r: '_Y --I ,J I Iu I u _ji+ all ------7 ---- v `. T- I_L 1 a 'N.- ,.. J -7_ ; ----' '- \ c- --__, NEW HE A D E N D SITE I 17 I \\ 1 i �� r� 2 2db k�. _ _.1_ 0 u t I Ii ► I I I H i \ i II r\ ---1- " ---- Lt- t __-_,-- ' ! _---f_-_--41_ 1 t . -, .(\.i \ -- , ' �rLJJ1 1 y . ,1 r-U i. 1 1) 5faill-lINEY1 -]NNE SVSITE aJNI , Ju_ii o Box 777, Hector, Minnesota 55342 Telephone 612 848-6231 April 7 , 1982 Ms . Jeanne Andre Administrative Assistant City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee , Minnesota 55379 Dear Ms . Andre : This letter is in response to the March 15 , 1982 letter from Zylstra Communications Corporation (ZCC) where ZCC is requesting disqualification of Progress Valley Total- vision (PVT) in the current cable television franchise proceeding . I have not heard to this date the consultant say that our application is deficient to a degree that it should be disqualified . The application selection procedures described in the RFP clearly state that applicants must comply with certain minimum bid requirements and PVT has done just that . We do not have to make any substantive amendments to correct defi- ciencies in our proposal . I would like to refer to the so called deficiencies that ZCC refers to in their letter . 1 . "PVT did not account for a 5% Franchise Fee . " Please refer to Section G, Form G-1 , Page 18 of 20 Line 18 Franchise Fees of PVT' s proposal . F Year 3 18 . 9 Year 5 25 . 2 " Year 10 52 . 1 Please refer to Section G, Form G-2 , Page 18 of 20 Line 18 Franchise Fees of PVT ' s proposal Year 3 13 . 3 Year 5 20 . 9 `. 441Year 10 36 . 8 What does this mean that we did not account for a 5% Franchise Fee? We have the information documented in -'"4 these two forms . Suttle Apparatus Corporation-Minnesota Division Communications Systems Services,Inc. Nosh American Communications Corporation Arrowhead Communications Corporation Cable Spinning Equipment Company Cable Communications Systems;Inc North American Communications,Inc. Suttle International Corporation Northland Cable TV Division Eagle Valley Telephone Company Suttle Apparatus Corporation Suttle Equipment Dlvis'oh Indlanhead Telephone Company Suttle Garibe,tnc r "{ " " ' Rapids Cable TV,Inc. Pine Island Telephone Company Tel Products Inc. Roam nasties,Inc. L, 2 . "PVT did not establish rates for the line extension areas based on proximity to the initial service area . " Please refer to Section H, Form H, Page 1 of 4 , Section 2 of PVT ' s proposal . Progress Valley shall extend service to areas outside the initial service area reaching or exceeding at least forty dwelling units per plant mile , as measured from the existing system , immediately following construction of the initial service area . Progress Valley shall extend and make cable television services available to every dwelling unit in all unserved , developing areas having at least forty (40 ) dwelling units planned per street mile , as measured from the existing system and shall extend its system simultaneously with the installation of utility lines . All residences described above will be served according to the uniform service rates as detailed in the rate section of this proposal . Any residences or industrial users not described above will be offered cable service on the acceptance of a quote by Progress Valley to provide such service . The quote to be calculated on a time and materials basis . Service drop installations under 200 feet will be charged the uniform install" fee as detailed in the rate section . Drops over 200 feet will be charged at cost on a time and material basis . As a general rule , PVT believes cable service is feasible in areas where population density equals 40 homes per mile or where commitments from subscribers exceed 20 subscribers per mile as measured from the end of exist- ing plant . PVT has conducted house counts of the designated line extension areas in Shakopee . Home density in these areas is generally less than 10 homes per mile. Even assuming all line extension area residents were willing to subscribe to cable , subscribership would still be insufficient to support the cost of the line extensions at more than $300 , 000 , which we believe to be far in excess of a reasonable burden to place on line extension area subscribers . 3 . "PVT did not propose activation of the required 50 channels . " Please refer to Section I , Form I , Page 15 of 32 , Section C. .Suttle Apparatus Corporation-Minnesota Division Communications Systems Services,Inc,. North American Communication � Arrowhead Communications Corporation Cable Spinning Equipment Company Cable Communications System'€, tic. North American Communications,Inc: Suttle International Corporation Northland Cable .V Division Eagle Valley Telephone Company Suttle Apparatus Corporation Softie Equipment Div!jog Indianhead Telephone Company Suttle Caribe,Inc. Rapids Cable TV,Inc. Pine Island Telephone Company Tel Products inr Roan Plastics. Inc 23 Modulators For subscriber network 13 Processors For subscriber network 14 Modulators For institutional network 50 Modulators or Processors for the system to be initially activated . 4 . "PVT' did not provide separate Public and Government Access Channels . " Our Public Access Channel will be on Channel 8 of the "B" cable full time and our Government Access will be on Channel 12 of the "B" cable full time . 5 . "PVT did not place the Regional Channel on Channel 6 of the Universal Tier . " Our Regional Channel , Channel 6 , will also be available to our Universal subscribers . This is accomplished by an ABC Switch which is manufactured by RMS Electronics Inc . , Model #ACS-6 or equivalent . In conclusion , I would like to refer you to the PVT proposal overview and summary section . In this section we state it is the intent of Progress Valley Totalvision in filing this application that it comply with all applicable Federal Communica- tions Commissions Regulations , Minnesota Cable Communications Board Rules and all other applicable federal laws and regulations , state statutes and rules as well as the city charters and ordinances of the community and the requirements of the Request for Proposals (RFP ) . Wherever possible , the provisions of the applicant shall be read to be consistent with such federal , state and local laws and regulations and the RFP . If any portion of this application is irreconcilable and does not comply with the above-referenced standards , it is due to an inadvertent error on the part of Progress Valley Totalvision . In such a case the minimum accept- able standards or requirements set forth in the applicable law, statute , regulations , rules , charter , ordinance or RFP shall supercede the portion of the application with which it conflicts and shall be deemed binding on each of the applications . We therefore believe that the application of PVT should not be dismissed and that the City should proceed with the schedule of the franchise proceedings with PVT and the other bidding company . Thank you . Sincerely , Arlen Muenzhuber Vice President and General Manager North American Communications Corp. Suitie Apparatus Corporation-Minnesota Division Communications Systems Services,Inc. :. Arrowhead Communications Corporation Cable Spinning Equipment Companyr North American Communications,Inc. Suttle lntsrnatiorlal Corporation Eagle Valley Te ephone Company Softie Apparatus Corporation lndlanhead Telephone Company Suttle t:ari&e:Inc: • "'' ��. ��o�s� � , Pine Island Telephone Company Tel Products,Inc. Reart Pta3t'rs. Inc. Er ED y r r HERBST & THUE, LTD. A 'R `J�2( ATTORNEYS AT LAW pp 2030 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER ^"A°: �� :' ef�O• EE ADRIAN E.HERESY '7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH TELEPHONE DANIEL D. THUE BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 (812) 835-2434 GARY R.MATZ JOHN F. GIEEs LEGAL ASSISTANT April 9 , 1982 Ms. Jeanne Andre c/o Shakopee City Hall 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Jeanne: Several important laws relating to cable communications were enacted during the recent session of the Minnesota legislature. In order to bring you up to date on these laws, I have prepared this summary of the significant legislation. Chapter 514. 1 . A change has been made in the definitional section of Minnesota Statutes §238 and this allows some cities to remove themselves from MCCB jurisdiction. The definition of a cable communications system is changed so that if the governing bodies of all political subdivisions to be served by a cable system vote to exclude that system from the jurisdiction of the MCCB, then that system will not be governed by the MCCB. Any system that has been removed from MCCB jurisdiction may be returned to that jurisdiction if the governing bodies of 50% or more of the political sub- divisions served by that system vote, by resolution, in favor of re-establishing MCCB jurisdiction over that system. 2 . The MCCB is authorized to adopt rules to ensure that all cable communications systems, including those which do not come under MCCB jurisdiction, provide adequate access for educational and governmental programming. In adopting these rules, the MCCB is instructed to give consideration to both the needs of the community and the capability of the system. HERBST & THUE, LTD. Ms . Jeanne Andre Page Two April 9, 1982 3 . The MCCB is prohibited from releasing economic data about a cable communications company, including operating revenues and profitability, to the general public or to other cable communications companies except when such disclosure is in furtherance of the specific duties or obli- gations of the MCCB. 4 . The MCCB is authorized to grant a certificate of confirmation for the same number of years as an initial franchise period. Previously, the MCCB could only grant a certificate of confirmation for ten years . This was very cumbersome because franchises are frequently granted for fifteen years . Similarly, the MCCB may now grant a renewal of a certificate of confirmation for the same number of years as a renewal franchise period. 5 . Cable communications companies are no longer liable for the programming content of any program presented over a leased channel or a channel made available for public access, governmental or educational purposes . This is a codification of a long standing MCCB regulation. 6 . The rates charged by a cable communications company along with a rate change procedure may be established by franchise. Previously, rates and the rate change procedure were required to be set forth in the franchise. Chapter 515. 1 . This statute changes the definition of a cable com- munications system by no longer requiring that the system operate "for hire" to be a cable system. This is intended to clarify that individuals who are subscribing to a univer- sal service tier, for which there is no charge, are, in fact, subscribers to a cable communications sytem. 2 . The MCCB is authorized to adopt rules to ensure reasonable access by cable communications companies to multiple unit dwellings and mobile home parks . As cable has come to the urban areas, examples of landlords refusing to permit the cable company to wire a building or tract of land has been more common. This provision is intended to assure that tenants have reasonable access to cable communications service. Ms . Jeanne Andre Page Three April 9, 1982 3 . This act also contains provisions similar to those previously discussed in Chapter 514 changing the certificate of confirmation period to coincide with the franchise term period. 4. The procedure for establishing all rates must be set forth in the franchise ordinance. Additionally, those rates charged by a cable communications company may be set forth in the ordinance or, in the alternative, the ordinance shall provide that the current rates and charges be available for public inspection. This provision is incon- sistent with that enacted in Chapter 514 relating to rates and rate regulation. Chapter 641 This act imposes a five percent sales tax on cable com- munications service. Should you have any questions on this legislation, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, ' qv" \A--.""i"'" Adrian E. Herbst AEH:ndr OFYICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA MARCH 30, 1982 Councilmembers Lebens, Wampach and Mayor Reinke convened in the Council Chambers at 6:00 p.m. (pursuant to the agenda) and proceeded to the Finance Department offices for an orientation session. Councilmembers Vierling, Leroux, and Colligan arrived during the orientation session. Mayor Reinke called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. with Cncl. Leroux, Vierling, Wampach, Lebens and Colligan present. Also present were the members of the Ad Hoc Cable Communications Committee (CCC) consisting of Gene Foudray, Lillian Abeln, Eileen Christensen, Lee Davis, Randy Gorman and Randy Kirchmeier. Also present were Anita Benda, consultant to the CCC; Julius A. Coller, II, City Attorney; H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer; Jeanne Andre, Administrative Ass't; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk and John K. Anderson, City Admr. Leroux/Vierling moved to direct the proper City officials to execute Change Order No. 3 for Halo 2nd Add'n/Bluff Avenue Improvements Contract No. 80-10/81-2 in the amount of $10,207.09. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Colligan/Vierling moved to direct City officials to make partial payment to Parrott Construction Co. , 2047 Eagle Creek Blvd. , Shakopee, Minn. , for Halo 2nd Add'n%Bluff Avenue Improvements, Contract No. 80-10/81-2 in the amount of $18,040.36. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. The Administrative Ass't stated that the City has received proposals from Zylstra- United and Progress Valley Totalvision. The City's consultant has analyzed these proposals and referred questions back to the companies. The two company's reply reports were just received yesterday and the consultant has not had time to analyze these latest reports. She explained the purpose of this joint meeting is to have the consultant give an over-view of what has been accomplished up to this point, answer any questions of the Council and set a public hearing on the cable franchise. Ms. Benda, the consultant, gave a little background regarding the time frame of the previous actions of the CCC, and said her purpose is to provide accurate information and analysis of the proposals. She explained that each company provided two sets of financial reports and rates based on two assumptions of service area; to wit, 1. Those households outside the initial service area would pay 100% of the cost of the line extension and service, and 2. Those outside the initial service area would pay 30% of the line extension and service, with all of the households (within the initial service and the line extension areas) picking up 70% of these costs. Ms. Benda then pointed out various important factors in the analysis and answered questions of Council, some of which were as follows: Ms. Benda stated that neither of the proposals met all of the requirements in the City's Request For Proposals (RFP), but they both signed affidavits stating that if they did not meet all the requirements it was a mistake and they meant to comply. She stated some consist of substantial changes, and it would be up to the City to decide whether or not to accept any substantial changes. Ms. Benda explained that her area of expertise was in the analysis of the services proposed, and there were two other consultants involved who analyzed the financial status and technical capabilities of the four proposals from the two companies. Dis- cussion followed regarding the advisibility of having the other two consultants present for the next meeting between the CCC and the Council. Ms. Benda was asked to check on the availability of these two consultants and the cost involved to have them present. Discussion was then held regarding the location of the head-in (plant) and the pos- sible need for a conditional use permit for the location referred to. Ms. Benda stated that without a confirmed site for the head-in, there would be a lack of infor- mation regarding the technical performance of the proposals. If a conditional use permit was required, it would not be able to be granted before the public hearing tentatively scheduled for April 27, 1982. The City Admr. suggested the public hear- ing could be held and the franchise not granted until a site is approved by the Plan- ning Commission. Mayor Reinke asked the consultant about separating "construedon work in progress" from operating expenses as far as affecting the rate of return. Ms. Benda was asked to check with the financial consultant regarding investment costs in relation to operating income. Ms. Benda was also asked to bring back figures showing the average rate of return for operating cable services in the metropolitan area -- the percentage rate of return on the investment, such as 17%, or whatever. Shakopee City Council March 30, 1982 _3 Page 2 Cncl. Leroux inquired as to marketing techniques of the two companies. Discussion followed. Gene Foudray, Chrm. of the CCC, stated that his committee is in full accord with the preliminary evaluation by the consultant, and they are comfortable with it. The consultant explained that the City Planner has determined that the head end sites submited in the proposals by each of the two firms require a conditional use permit. Consensus was to have the two companies present sites which do not need conditional use permits as alternate site, with the consultant providing technical evaluation of the original and alternate sites. Consensus was that the process for conditional use permits on the original sites should also be initiated so that the time-table for the public hearing on the cable franchise and the public hearings for the con- ditional use permits could be progressing simultaneously. The Chrm. of the CCC suggested proceeding with the program as scheduled by the CCC and at the end of the public hearing, direct the consultant to proceed with any fur- ther problems, if any. Colligan/Lebens moved to approve the format for the April 27, 1982 public hearing on the cable communications franchise as recommended by the Ad Hoc Cable Communications Committee at its March 24, 1982 meeting. Consensus was to reserve a larger room for the public hearing, such as the high school auditorium or cafeteria. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Vierling moved to set a public hearing for April 27, 1982 at 7:00 P.M. at a place to be determined for the consideration of a cable communications franchise. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Lebens moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 9:25 P.M. Judith S. Cox City Clerk Diane S. Beuch Recording Secretary RUBBER INDUSTRIES, INC. Alty 200 CAVANAUGH DRIVE/P.O. BOX 6/SHAKOPEE, MINN.55379/TELEPHONE 612-445-1320 ,RECEIVED APR 14 1982 CITY OF SHAKOPEE April 12 , 1982 Mr. John Anderson City Administrator City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee , MN 55379 Dear John: I would like to extend an invitation to the Shakopee City Council to visit the Rubber Industries plant here in Shakopee . It is possible that we did not present all the information that the members of the Council might feel necessary during the meeting last Tuesday night . We at Rubber Industries stand ready to show Council members through our facility, explain our project with Cornelius in greater detail , and answer any questions they may have . If Council members are interested in visiting with us either individually or in groups , they may call me at 445-1320. We will be pleased to arrange a visit and tour to meet their schedule convenience . Many thanks . Sincerely, Arthur J. Hatch President AJH:ab cc : Mayor Eldon A. Reinke SPECIALIZING IN CUSTOM MOLDED RUBBER PARTS AND PRECISE ROLLERS RECEIVED APR 161982 CITY OF SHAKOPEE St. Francis Hospital - 325 WEST FIFTH AVENUE•SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA 55379•(612)445-2322 April 14, 1982 Eldon Reinke, Mayor City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: Request to Vacate Atwood Street Dear Mayor Reinke, St. Francis Hospital has made substantial progress improving the parking situation for our patients, visitors and employees in the past year.* We presently have 270 off street parking spaces available in the land surrounding St. Francis Hospital . * Block 43 65 spaces * Block 45 66 spaces * Block 57 100 spaces Block 58 15 spaces Block 59 24 spaces We have developed an arrangement with St. Mark' s for the multiple use of the parking lots on Blocks 43 and 45. The Hospital , the Church and the School have enjoyed this relationship of sharing parking facilities whereby parties benefit mutually. It is our goal to finalize a similar arrangement with Scott County and provide permanent off street parking on Block 57 prior to August, 1983. We continue to work with the County and the City to resolve the storm water problem currently associated with Block 57. As the sole owner of the land abutting Atwood Street between 4th and 5th Avenues, I would like to take this opportunity to submit a petition to vacate this street. I would ask that the City Council consider this request as part of our overall parking plan for Block 57, whereby the lot would be able to serve 350 vehicles at one time. This action would serve the public interest in that 58 additional off street parking spaces would be made available and the City would reduce its exposure as well as maintenance and reconstruction costs. SPONSORED BY THE FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF ST. PAUL, MN Mayor Eldon Reinke April 14, 1982 Page Two Our request is consistent with Shakopee' s Comprehensive Transportation Plan in that vacating Atwood would have little impact on the streets designated as, collectors, arterials or bus routes. Your positive response indicates to us your strong support of St. Francis Hospital as a vital part of the Shakopee Community. Thank you. Sincerely, LAW Si sr Agnes Ot 7 ng Executive Director SAO:hme Enclosure cc: Father John Cassidy Mr. Joe Ries Mr. John Anderson 4 - .._ Al • AT-WOOD\ STREET t i i as 1 1 . i1,4LI11 9111 hi1II111- V-1 ~ 11 r p , S K C III /-I 1 - - .o .i`. I Y 1 I 1 I I 1 1 i I «_ tel/ / w r 1.' ,i 1 1 r -- -- —----- O - 2 - i • D ' m . _ ---- --- D • Ili writ 3 • FULLER SRFVT `,t r . ,. 1-% i ,. :, --\ .; 1.,....t , 0 c •„. _. __2 1 ! c , _a it - - ? f �- ., hi ; ... . itti eiE: I ---.0,....--"•„ • a , i t,. p. A ! r :11 ii ^ i i 4 .. a i • ti-, i 1 1 : • - L_ r / 4-•••••• ltnt Cr-TY C Capesius Agency, Inc YOUR INDEPENDENT INSURANCE AGENTS P.O. Box 97. First National Bank Bldg.. Shakopee, MN 55379 Tel. (612) 445-1922 April 2 , 1982 Mr . John Anderson , City Administrator and the Honorable Members of the City Council 129 East First Avenue Shakopee , Minnesota 55379 RE : Open House Event Gentlemen : The week of May 17th through 21st , 1982 , the Capesius Agency and the First National Bank of Shakopee are co—sponsoring an Open House for our newly remodeled faciliites . One of the planned highlights would be to provide Hot Air Balloon rides which would be held on Friday , May 21st . However , in order to accomodate the HotAir Balloon , we will require the City ' s permission to rope off and utilize the entire Municipal parking Lot located on Second Avenue in front of the Huber Building . We would take responsibility for roping off the area and providing crowd control . The City would be furnished with a Certificate of Insurance to limit their liability exposure . We feel this event would be of great benefit for the promotion of the Downtown businesses as we are anticipating an attraction of 300-400 people . The rides will be open to the public and given without charge . Thank you for your consideration of this request and we will appreciate hearing from you at your earliest opportunity so we can proceed with all necessary arrangements . Since ,Aly , 411.1.1"' 442-12)) ee L . Hennen / ss 1 MOTOR`VEHICLE SERVICES DIVISION HIGHWAY BUILDING e mss. NEM k,It 9F hoe9 APR 1 31982 STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF $HAKOPEE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SAINT PAUL 55155 12 April 1982 Mr John Anderson City Administrator Shakopee, Minn 55379 Dear Mr Anderson; The reason for my writing; this letter to you is in regards to the possibility of having enough room for three vehicles designated as NOt'ARKINJ for Wednesdays only. At the present time we are giving Road Tests for Minn Drivers License out of the Court House. We have been on the main level for a number of years but because of some desired changes in the Court souse, we have been asked if we would object to moving to the Civil Defense room on the lower level. I have no objections to the move but it does create somewhat of a parking problem. The two parking areas being on the west and southwest of the building proper puts those areas Quite a distance from the room that we will be using. Much time is lost in the going to and from the vehicles. It would mean going about a block either way. I looked at the lath dtreet side of the c ourt house but the curb is too high for many of the new small automobiles. The east side looks to be the most suited because of the curb height. About 60 to 65 feet would be needed end could run from the south edge of the apron going into the garage and south. Our hours are from 8: 00 am to 4; 30 pm and on Wednesdays only. This area would be for applicants and not usedffr personnel parking. I would appreciate your'''s and the City Councils consideration regarding the above matter. Thanking You, Sinerey, , Ica . . or @Aid EQUAL O ORTUNITY EMPLOYER 806 Apgar 55 Shakopee, Flinn 55379 5CEIVED 11415 APR 1219B2 MI IIII CITY OF SHAKOPEE league of minnesota cities DATE: March 15, 1982 TO: Mayors, Clerks and Managers On behalf of the Nominating Committee, I would like to request your advice in pro- posing candidates for the Board of Diredtors for the League of Minnesota Cities. The Board positions that expire in June, 1982 are: Mayor June Demos, Roseville; William Jokela, Clerk-Administrator, Sandstone; Bonita Carlson, Finance Director, Chaska; and Susan Edel , Councilmember, Winona. The officers of the League of Minnesota Cities, the president and vice president, are elected annually. Those positions are now filled by: Mayor Vaughn Thorfinnson, Red Lake Falls as President; and Mayor Josephine Nunn, Champlin, as Vice President: The Nominating Committee will work with the guidelines for Board representation, which were developed as a result of the deliberations of past nominating committees. Those guidelines appear on the reverse side of this letter. Enclosed also is a listing of present Board Members and officers of the League. The Nominating Committee has scheduled a meeting for May, and it would be helpful to have your input. If you know of a city official who would be considered for nomination, please give his or her name and a brief resume of qualification to Helen Schendel of the League staff, or direct correspondence to myself. Our goal is to make sure that any good candidate is considered. Whether or not to let an individual know that you are submitting his or her name, is, of course., up to you. The Nominating Committee, however, makes it a practice to confirm the fact that an individual is willing to serve before presenting his or her name to the annual conference. On behalf of the Nominating Committee, I wish to thank you in advance for your help and assure you that all suggestions will be seriously considered. Sincerely yours, ,/jAA-44c-A„, usan Edel Councilmember, Winona Chairperson, Nominating Committee HMS/kgj (OVER) 300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 55101 [6127222-2881 GUIDELINES 1. Geographic and population size representation. There has been a conscious effort to see that different parts of the state are represented on the Board, as well as the different sizes of cities that are among the League' s constituency. 2. Twin Cities area/outstate balance. While there are no specific seats on the Board reserved for Twin Cities' area or outstate members , it has been a consistent practice to maintain a rough balance of board members from these areas. 3. Elected/appointed balance. Traditionally both elected and appointed muni- cipal officials have participated in all aspects of the League's activities, including membership in the Board of Directors. Although no specific number of seats on the Board are reserved for elected as distinct from appointed officials , it has been a consistent practice to have a majority of the board composed of elected officials. Furthermore, there has been some effort to provide an oppor- tunity for a variety of appointed officials (e.g. , clerks , city managers, attorneys, assessors, etc. ) , to serve on the board. 4. Rotation of membership. In view of the fact that the League has more than 750 member cities , any individual who serves a full term on the board is not normally considered for another board term. However, persons with board exper- ience are often considered as potential officers. /kgj BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF LEAGUE 1981-1982 Terms of Office President: Vaughn Thorfinnson, Mayor, Red Lake Falls Elected by membership, June, 1981 Term expires, June, 1982 Vice-President: Josephine Nunn, Mayor, Champlin Elected by membership, June, 1981 Term expires, June, 1982 Directors: Sue Edel , Council Member, Winona Elected by membership, June 1979 Term to expire, June, 1982 Bonita Carlson, Finance Director, Chaska Elected by membership, June, 1979 Term to expire, June, 1982 William Jokela, Clerk-Administrator, Sandstone Elected by membership, June, 1979 Term to expire, June, 1982 June Demos, Mayor, Roseville Elected by membership to fill unexpired term of Gerald Weyrens, June, 1980 Term to expire, June, 1982 Robert Anderson, Council Member, International Falls Elected by membership, June, 1980 Term to expire, June, 1983 Walter Rockenstein, Alderman, Minneapolis Elected by membership, June, 1980 Term to expire, June, 1983 Ann Roseland, City Clerk, Ham Lake Elected by membership, June, 1980 Term to expire, June, 1983 Adrian Herbst, Council Member, Bloomington Elected by membership, June, 1980 Term to expire, June, 1983 John Fedo, Mayor, Duluth Elected by membership, June, 1981 Term to expire, June, 1984 C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor, Edina Elected by membership, June, 1981 Term to expire, June, 1984 (OVER) Morris Lanning, Mayor, Moorhead Elected by membership, June, 1981 Term to expire, June, 1984 Steven Perkins, Mayor, Pipestone Elected by membership, June, 1981 Term to expire, June, 1984 Ex-Officio: James Krautkremer, Mayor, Brooklyn Park President of Association of Metropolitan Municipalities June, 1981 Term to expire, June, 1982 LMC Immediate Past President: George Latimer, Mayor, St, Paul June, 1981 Term to expire, June, 1982 3/15/82 kgj National 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Officers: (Z14-046(FP League Washington,D.C. President Ferd L Harrison of 20004 Mayor.Scotland Neck.North Carolina Cities (202)626-3000 First Vice President Cable:NLCITIES Charles Royer Mayor,Seattle,Washington D Second Vice President a: George Latimer rcAvk + ..ate Mayor,St.Paul,Minnesota Immediate Past President APR 6 William H.Hudnut,Ill 1982Mayor,Indianapolis.Indiana Executive Director � Alan Beals CITY OF SHAKOPEE To: (1) Mayors and Managers of Direct Member Cities (2) Executive Directors of State Municipal Leagues (3) Steering Committee Members From: George Gross, Director, Federal Relations Subject: NLC Legislative Letter: 2 April 1982 In this issue: Antitrust Legislation - The Boulder Decision As city officials know, the Supreme Court' s recent decision in Community Communications Company v. City of Boulder (January 13 , 1982) greatly expands the exposure of cities to liability under the federal antitrust laws. As a result, at its Congressional- City Conference in March, NLC' s Board of Directors urged the Congress to enact legislation to reverse this decision. In the Boulder case, the court held that the federal antitrust laws apply to municipal actions unless these actions are taken in furtherance of clearly articulated and affirmatively expressed state policy. The Court refused to extend to cities the state action exemption established in Parker v. Brown, which insulated the actions of states from antitrust challenge. The result is that states are fully protected against antitrust challenges while local actions are not. The Boulder ruling is likely to be extremely troublesome to cities. Without specific state authorization, such fundamental governmental activities as zoning, licensing, franchising, procurement, and regulatory decisions may now be challenged. Yet because the Boulder decision is so broad, it provides no direction to states to define the antitrust standards that will govern municipal actions. In addition, cities may now be subject to treble damages under the antitrust laws. Past Presidents:Tom Bradley,Mayor,Los Angeles,California•Henry W.Maier,Mayor,Milwaukee,Wisconsin•Tom Moody,Mayor,Columbus,Ohio•Jessie M.Rattley,Councilwoman,Newport News.Virginia•John P.Rousakis,Mayor.Savannah,Georgia•Directors:Richard Arrington,Jr.,Mayor,Birmingham,Alabama•Carol Bellamy,Council President,New York,New York•Arne Boyum,Executive Director,North Dakota League of Cities•Richard S.Caliguiri,Mayor,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania•Malcolm Clark,Council Member,Port Arthur,Texas•Joanne Collins,Council Member,Kansas City,Missouri•Thomas H.Cooke,Jr.,Mayor.East Orange,New Jersey•David Cunningham,Council Member,Los Angeles,California•W.Elmer George,Executive Director, Georgia Municipal Association•Karen M.Graves,Commissioner,Salina.Kansas•Anne Gresham,Council Member,Grand Prairie,Texas•Paul E.Haney,Council Member,Rochester,New York• Jonathan B.Howes,Mayor Pro Tern,Chapel Hill,North Carolina•George M.Israel,Ill,Mayor.Macon,Georgia•Myra Jones,Vice Mayor.Little Rock,Arkansas•Christopher G.Lockwood, Ex^^,utive Director,Maine Municipal Association•Bob Martinez,Mayor,Tampa,Florida•Robert H.Miller,Executive Director,South Dakota Municipal League•Jack Nelson,Mayor,Beaverton, Oregon•Mary Neuhauser,Council Member,Iowa City,Iowa•C.David Nuessen,Mayor,Quincy,Illinois•Hernan Padilla,Mayor,San Juan,Puerto Rico•Donald R.Peoples,Chief Executive. Butte.Montana•Martin L.Peterson,Executive Director,Association of Idaho Cities•Michael J.Quinn,Executive Director,Indiana Association of Cities and Towns•Vernon H.Ricks,Jr.,Mayor Pro Tern,Takoma Park,Maryland•Arthur E.Trujillo,Mayor,Santa Fe,New Mexico•George V.Voinovich,Mayor,Cleveland,Ohio•Daniel K.Whltehurst,Mayor.Fresno,California•Don A. Zimmerman,Executive Director,Arkansas Municipal League. -2- 9." 0t, Q •City officials should contact their Senators and Representatives VAP on this issue as soon as possible. Bring to their attention any .' antitrust suits filed against the city on the basis of the Boulder decision, any delays in city action caused by the decision, and the prospects for state legislation to immunize city actions. Even if your city has not yet been affected by the decision, point out the city' s potential problems (for example, in granting an exclusive taxicab license) in avoiding costly lawsuits. Antitrust laws are under the jurisdiction of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. The following Members should be contacted and urged to hold hearings on the Boulder decision and its impact on local governments : House Judiciary Committee Rodino (N.J. ) , Chairman McClory (Ill. ) Brooks (Texas) Railsback (Ill. ) Kastenmeier (Wisc. ) Fish (N.Y. ) Edwards (Calif. ) Butler (Va. ) Conyers (Mich. ) Moorhead (Calif. ) Seiberling (Ohio) Ashbrook (Ohio) Danielson (Calif. ) Hyde (Ill. ) Mazzoli (Ky. ) Kindness (Ohio) Hughes (N.J. ) Sawyer (Mich. ) Hall (Texas) Lungren (Calif. ) Synar (Okla. ) Sensenbrenner (Wisc. ) Schroeder (Colo. ) McCollum (Fla. ) Evans (Ga. ) Glickman (Kan. ) Washington (Ill. ) Frank (Mass. ) Senate Judiciary Committee Thurmond (S .C. ) , Chairman Biden (Del. ) Mathias (Md. ) Kennedy (Mass. ) Laxalt (Nev. ) Byrd (W.Va. ) Hatch (Utah) Metzenbaum (Ohio) Dole (Kan. ) DeConcini (Ariz. ) Simpson (Wyo. ) Leahy (Vt. ) East (N.C. ) Baucus (Mt. ) Grassley (Iowa) Heflin (Ala. ) Denton (Ala. ) Specter (Pa. ) House Members may be reached on 202-225-3121; Senators on 202-224-3121. association of BULLETIN metropolitan municipalities RECEIVED April 7, 1982 APR 81982 TO: Mayors and Managers/Administrators CITY OF SHAKOPEE FROM: .AMM Staff RE: SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT, AMM POLICY COMMITTEES AND AM,i OFFICE ADDRESS CHANGE - Metropolitan Council's Proposed Surface Water Management Plan - Public Hearing Recently your city should have received a copy of a proposed plan for "Surface Water Management" promulgated by the Metropolitan Council. When adopted by the Council, it will become part of the Metropolitan Council's Development Guide. The Metropolitan Council has scheduled a public hearing on this proposed plan for Thursday, April 29, 4:00 - 5:30 p.m. and again at 7:00 p.m. in the Metropolitan Council Chambers in the Metro Square Building. The Council's proposed plan has many implications for cities. As you may know, the Legislature addressed the surface water management issue during the recently completed Legislative session and passed H.F. 1505 - S.F. 1451 (Laws 1982, Chapter 509). The law, as passed, was generally consistent with AMM Policy (summary attached). However, the pro- posed plan put forth by the Metropolitan Council differs in many respects from Laws 1982, Chapter 509 and generally would give the Metropolitan Council more authority and responsibility with respect to surface water management than the new law does. We would suggest that you review the Metropolitan Council's pro- posed surface water r.,anagement plan very carefully and if it is a concern to your city, make arrangements to present your views at the public hearing on April 29th. We believe that in view of the fact that the Legislature held extensive hearings on this subject during the past several months and made certain decisions delin- eating"who does what" with respect to surface water management, the Metropolitan Council's plan should conform to state law! This will be the central theme of the AMU's testimony at =he April 29th public hearing. - AMM Legislative Policy Committees - Volunteer Now! The ANM's Legislative Policy Committees will begin to meet shortly to develop the legislative proposals for the 1983-84 Legislative Biennium. While the basic membership of these committees was appointed last summer, there is always need for additional help and ideas. Present members will be automatically continued. There are openings on =he following committees: 1) Metropolitan Agencies (considers legislative and non-legislative issues and concerns related to the Metropolitan Council and Commissions ); 2) Municipal Revenues (considers any matter relating to 300 hanover bldg. 480 cedar street, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 222-2861 revenues, taxes, levy limits, etc. ); 3) Housing (concerns itself with all per- tinent housing issues); 4) General Legislation (considers issues which impact metropolitan area cities outside the scope of the other committees).. Please indicate on the enclosed form your desire to serve, the committee you wish to serve on, and any issues which you think should be studied. Please return the form to the AMM office by May 1, 1982. - A1v I--LMC Offices to Move in April Member cities should observe that the AMM office will be moving to the new LMC office building at 183 University Avenue East, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 beginning Thursday April 22. The move is planned to be completed over the weekend and we hope to begin operations at the new location on Monday, April 26th. The new phone number for the AMM and LMC offices will be 227-5600. Please make note of the change. The current phone number will be answered through Thursday, April 22nd. WE REQUEST THAT THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICIAL RECEIVING THIS BULLETIN DISTRIBUTE THIS INFORMATION TO THE OTHER APPROPRIATE OFFICIALS IN YOUR CITY. Thank you. VP/RP/cr 4 ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES (Please Return By May 1st) NAME: CITY POSITION: CITY: PREFERRED MAILING ADDRESS: (street) (city) (zip code) PREFERRED TELEPHONE CONTACT NUMBER: COMMITTEE CHOICE Municipal Revenues Metropolitan Agencies Housing General Legislation SUGGESTED ISSUES TO BE STUDIED: PLEASE RETURN TO: Association of Metropolitan Municipalities 300 Hanover Building, 480 Cedar Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 ATTN: Carol Williams BLACKMAR AND REHM - et, ATTORNEYS AT LAW APR FIRST BURNSVILLE STATE BANK BUILDING APR 1 6 1982 301 WEST BURNSVILLE PARKWAY BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 ,sa�� �y ® C .s9X 9F$HA(OPI April 15, 1982 THOMAS J. BLACKMAR TELEPHONE ERIC S. REHM (612)890-7050 Mr. John Anderson Manager, City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Re: John Wood Our File No. R-9555 Dear Mr, Anderson: Please be advised that this office has been retained by Mr. and Mrs . John Wood who reside at 4520 Embassy Circle in Prior Lake. Mr. and Mrs. Wood have retained this office to represent them in regard to a claim they have for trespass upon their property and destruction of various trees and shrubs as well as the diminuation of the value of their property sus- tained by nature of the negligent manner in which the maintenance crew trimmed the bushes around the public utility poles and lines adjacent to their property. It appears that on March 1, 1982 the crew was working in the vicinity of my clients' home trimming the taller, smaller branches of various trees around his home. At that time my client inquired of this crew what they were doing and they did explain to him that they were merely trimming the smaller branches of the various trees around his home for utility purposes. My client indicated that he had no objection to that, but asked them to please be careful not to destroy any of the larger trees. On March 3, the crew returned; this time to work on the road to the west of my clients' property and at which time they commenced to destroy practically all the vegetation, whether it be a one to four inch tree or a shrub, six to eight feet within my clients ' property line and approximately sixteen to twenty feet away from the utility line. Once my client was aware of this action, he notified the Public Utility Commission immediately, at which time the crew stopped their work. It was not, however, until after they had cleared away approximately 90% of that property line of my client. My client then contacted the manager of the Public Utilities Commission, Mr. Louis Van Hout, and was placed on the agenda for the City Council meeting for March 8, 1982. At that time, he was led to believe that the City Council would look into the matter further and that one of the members would make an on-sight investigation and inspection of the damages. Mr. John Anderson Page 2 April 15, 1982 It appears that the City Council met again on March 15, and decided to take no further action on the claim and confirmed that in a letter written to my client, dated March 19, 1982. At this point, my client has itemized all of the trees that have been destroyed by the crew and has obtained estimates from a local nursery to determine the replacement cost of those trees . Rather than going into any great detail , the replacement cost of those trees would be $14,820. In addition, my client has also taken many photographs of the area and would be more than willing to have anyone from the City come out to review the area with him. The purpose of this letter is to make a formal demand of the City that my client be fully compensated for any and all damages he has incurred due to the negligent actions of the Public Utilities Commission service crew. It is my understanding that the City Attorney has been advised of the problem, and wished to be notified prior to commencing any civil suit. Please be advised that we would appreciate hearing from you as soon as possible to determine how these problems can be rectified immediately. Thank you very much for your consideration. Very truly yours, J V Eric S. Rehm ESR:kl cc: Phillip R. Krass, Esq. Louis Van Hout John and Betsy Wood 01111111 SCOTT COUNTY i7 HUMAN SERVICES 699 COUNTY ROAD 83 SHAKOPEE, MN. 55379 (612) 445-7750 PEG R. SUBBY- Assistant Administrator Human Services City Council Members City of Shakopee 129 E. 1st Ave. Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: Shakopee Senior Citizen Center near Council Members: I am writing this letter in response to questions that I under- stand were raised at the last council meeting concerning county support of the Shakopee Senior Citizen Center Program. The Scott County Human Services Board has approved its final budget for 1982. This budget does not include any money for ex- pansion of Senior Citizen director's hours, yet the budget does maintain the center director' s hours at the same level as 1981. The budget also expands county participation to the point Were it is entirely funded with county money. The need for an additional four hours has risen because of the establishment of the second center at the Levy Drive apartments. we have found that the arranging and coordination time is nearly doubled with two centers. The current level of funding allows for the director to work up to 60 hours per month. During 1981, we did pay the director for more than 60 hours a few months. We were able to do this because the Senior Citizen Supervisor position was vacant for three months due to a medical leave. This vacancy no longer exists. Therefore, we can no longer transfer money from the vacant position to pay for extra hours of the director. At present, the Scott County Human Services Board has no plans to reduce its support of the County Senior Citizen Program. It is difficult to predict what funding will be available for senior citizens programs in 19$3 and beyond. As you know, the Reagan Administration has proposed that the federal government terminate all direct funding of social service programs by 1985. If this takes place, the County Board will obviously need to reevaluate its fundings of all social service programs. The Board will have difficulty in doing this, though, until they have received more information about projected federal and state financial support. An Equal Opportunity Employer If the City of Shakopee were to decide to provide financial sup- port to the senior citizen director, we would propose that the payment be made directly to the director. This is the method used in Savage and Prior Lake. It was initially established in order to eliminate the administrative costs involved with fund transfers and to provide some municipal control of expenditures. We would be happy to consider other methods if they seem more appropriate to you. Once again, thank you for your consideration of this proposal. Betty Pink, the Senior Citizen Program Supervisor will plan to attend the council meeting on April 20 to answer any additional questions you might have. Sincerely r. ituka Micheal Peterson Human Services Manager MP: dmh MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Developer' s Agreement - ICC Review DATE: April 16 ,• 1982 Introduction The City held a meeting March 25 , 1982 with developers to receive their comments of the proposed changes in the City' s developers agreement (February 25 , 1981 draft ) . One developer attended, Gary Eastlund. Dick Wiggin also submitted some comments at an earlier meeting. City Council received comments from the above developers and staff at its regular April 6 , 1982 meeting as listed below, and they were forwarded to the ICC. Comments Listed in 3/31/81 Memo Comments 1 and 2 are from Mr. Wiggin, 3 - 9 are from Gary Eastlund, and the balance are from City staff: 1 . Page 9 - permits City to keep the extra 50% until all lots have paid assessment . Questions if legal . Old agreement 50 kept only until 2/3 lots paid and then the 50% in fact took care of the balance and the agreement could then be released. Staff proposes that a paragraph VII (F) be added which provides that the 10% deposit in VII. E ( 1 ) and the 50% overage in VII E ( 2 ) , plus accumulated interest , shall be applied to pay the balance of assessments due once there is sufficient funds accumulated to do so. 2 . Page 8 and 9 - City may wish to chose the payment method rather than leave it up to the developer: a. If its a desirable development where all lots should go fast , 10% up front would be best . b. If there are undesirable lots which may not sell for a long time , or maybe never, 150% method would afford City best protection. 3 . Page 3 paragraph B - add a performance bond option with the City named on any bonds provided by subcontractor rather than the general contractor. 4. Page 6 paragraph D - drop the "100%" petition, its confusing and may cause problems when an improvement benefits property adjacent to the development . 5 . a . Page 7 paragraph E( 1 ) - Use the 10% downpayment for the final assessment payments rather than holding it at 5% until all the assessments are paid and then returning it to the developer ( same as #1 above ) . Mayor and City Council "d`-- Page Two April 16 , 1982 b. Page 7 paragraph E( 1 ) - Can the 5% interest paid by the City be changed? 6 . Page 7 - Will the City change its policy and allow the assessment to be passed on to the new owner rather than it being paid at 100% or 150% before the occupancy permit is issued. 7 . Page 8 - Why 150%, why not 125% or some other number? 8 . Page 13 - who should sign the agreement? Should it be the fee owner, all mortgage companies and the developer? 9 . The developers agreement as written does not provide for indicat- ing which payment method is to be used. This needs to be added. 10 . In figuring park dedication, it is based on optimum development permitted by the subdivision ordinance , however , the proposed agreement allows for adjustment at time of issuance of building permit . 11 . Will the City permit the 150% assessment payment on older developers agreements to be changed from collection at the building permit to collection at the occupancy permit? Amend old agreements . 12 . Should the City include the requirement that electrical and gas utilities be included as a Plan A requirement in the developers agreement . Summary and Recommendation Prior to ICC Review I have checked with the cities of Edina and Bloomington about questions No. 1 , No. 5a , and No. 5b. Edina does not require the 107 downpayment or collect assessments on lots at a rate higher than 100%, therefore , they do not deal with interest on the downpayment . Edina only assesses for 3 years , however, rather than 10 or 15 years , Bloomington combines a 10 downpayment requirement with the collection of 125% of the assess- ment on each lot sold. The developers agreement states that the inter- est rate paid on the 107 and the accumulating 25% ( 125% - 100%) is at a fixed 721. However, Mr. Shuck, who handles developers agreements , says they pay the same interest that the City paid on its last bond issue . Bloomington allows the downpayment and 25% that is accumulating to be used to pay for the final balance on the assessments . Staff recommends that the changes proposed in items No. 1 , 2, 4, 5a, 8 , 9 , 10 and 11 above be incorporated in the proposed amendments to the developers agreement and that items No. 3 , 5b, 6 that are covered again below, & 7, & 12 be discussed before a recommendation is made. ICC Review & Comments Items discussed by the ICC that are listed above and which the ICC ' s recommendation matches that already made have not been repeated. New and/or additional comments are listed below: Mayor and City Council Page Three April 16 , 1982 13 . Page 3 paragraph B - can one letter of credit for a Plan 'A' improvement serve as the developer' s "line of credit" for the bank' s and the City' s 125% "letter of credit'.' . Roc. ';rass stated that this may be in fact what the bank does if the same bank does both, however, the City needs the letter because if both were listed there is no way the City could be sure the money has not been all withdrawn even though all elements of the pro- ject are not completed. 14. Page 4 paragraph F ( 3 ) - why can' t the developer' s design engineer do the as builts to avoid having the City redo them. He could do them or we could include a clause stating that if he doesn' t do them within 120 days after final payment the City will . However, since the City has the inspector on the job, the City is in the best position to do the as builts which primarily include noting ties for service locations , actual rock profiles , etc. The design engineer would have to have his own inspector on the job doing much the same thing the City inspector does for him to do the as builts . 15 . Page 1 paragraph I (A) - add to the end of the sentence. . . "approved plans on file at City Hall" . 16 . Page 5 paragraph VII (B) - add. . . "provision of VII (E) ( 1 ) and VII E ( 2 )" . 17 . Pages 7 and 8 payment methods 1 and 2 - can a third payment method be added which would be better suited to platting of larger sub- divisions which was a goal of the committee amending the sub- division ordinance . The primary concern here was that neither method 1 or 2 allowed the assessment to be passed along to the new owner which was typical for commercial and industrial development and which is used by some communities for resi- dential developments . Staff proposes that a third payment method be offered, for commercial and industrial development only, similar to one being offered in Prior Lake . The third payment method would offer an option that included a downpayment equal to 257 of the engineer ' s estimate of the project cost and a maximum of a 5 year limit on the special assessments . The shorter life of the bonds will mean lower interest costs for the City and thus the developer under our current 2% policy. 18 . Page 7 paragraph E ( 1 ) - can the 5% interest paid by the City be changed? Yes , it can be changed to some other fixed rate or, as staff proposes , it can be changed to "The cash so paid by the Developer to the City will bear interest for each year at a rate equal to one percent (1%) below the average interest rate (rounded to the nearest quarter) on the investments held by the City on December 31st of the respective year' . Mayor and City Council Page Four April 16 , 1982 19 . Page 10 paragraph D - as in item #3 in the pre-ICC meeting list , the ICC questioned if a performance bond option might be added. Performance bonds are regularly used by cities ; however, the City Attorney has cautioned us that should the City have to use the performance bond it often requires time and money to collect it so it is not quite the tool the other two options are . Recommendation for ICC Comments Staff recommends that changes 13 and 14 not be made for the reasons given and that changes 15-19 be made as proposed. Action Requested Direct staff to revise the February 25 , 1982 draft incorporating proposed changes #1-19 except #7 , #13 and #14. JKA/jms MEMO TO: John K. Anderson/City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre/Assistant Administrator RE: Levee Drive Grant Application DATE: April 16, 1982 Introduction: Pursuant to Council direction at its April 6, 1982 meeting, further documentation for a fiscal year 1982 LAWCON/LCMR grant has been prepared. Background: City Council approval is sought to submit a fiscal year 1983 grant application for funding under the federal Land and Water Conservation Fund (LAWCON) or Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCMR) . The application deadline is April 30, 1982. It is anticipated that there will be no LAWCON funds and $950,000 in LCMR funds for the seven-county metropolitan area for FY83. Of this amount $82,935 will be available to free-standing growth centers (category in which Shakopee falls) under the Metropolitan Council guidelines. As a general rule-of-thumb a grant of this amount would require a match of $82,935, for a total project cost of $165,870. At its last meeting the City Council expressed interest in preparing a grant for development of Levee Drive Park. Staff decided to focus on the four block area between Scott and Lewis Streets. Better estimates of potential elements of the devel- opment were solicited. Lou Van Hout was unable to provide more information about the cost of undergrounding the electrical lines, but indicated that the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission is supportive of further analysis of this project. The Commis- sion is considering contracting a design engineer who would work this project into a total electrical design for the downtown, with related cost estimates. For the purpose of this memo the $50,000 estimate previously provided by Mr. Van Hout will stand. No further clarification of the cost of the river look-out was solicited. Mr. Muenchow has suggested this element is most suitable for a system upgrade in the future. The City Engineer assisted in establishing the previously stated cost of $12,692 for the bituminous trail so the cost was kept intact except for a 107 increase for 1983 completion. City engineering staff reviewed the previous estimate to clean and grub and landscape the four block area based on bids received for the V.I.P. interceptor. This cost was raised to $15,600, with 107 again added to provide for the one year delay in implementation. Associated Mechanical assisted in providing a better estimate of the plumbing for the restroom facility and the building inspector estimated the cost of the structure. A simple facility is anticipated to be built on the southeast corner of the Community Services Building at a cost of $25,000, a slight decrease from the previous estimate. The attached table lists all of the possible elements of the project with the revised cost estimates. Three columns list the grant dollars available under three possible options) both LAWCON and LCMR funds available for a grant providing approximately 75% of the project cost, or only LCMR funding, for a 50% grant. The one exception to this approximation is the cost of the public restroom facility. Under current LCMR policy, they would fund only 12.5% of this element, with the City providing either 38.5% or 87.57 of the cost. As previously suggested no LAWCON funds are anticipated, so the columns listed Option #2 and #3 indicate the most likely funding situation. If the City were to undertake all five elements of the project listed John K. Anderson April 16, 1982 1 Page -2- under Option #2, the grant portion of the project would be $68,687, with an $87,437 contribution by the City. I recommend instead that the City drop the lookout option and go with the other four elements as listed in Option #3. This would involve a grant of $43,687 with a $62,437 contribution by the City. Sources for the City share were investigated. Park Reserve Fund is the basic source investigated. According to the revised 1982 City budget, $27,810 is anticipated as a year-end fund balance for 1982. Due to an error in revising the JEJ acquisition costs, this balance should actually be $45,810. Revenue projections for the park reserve fund for 1983 are approximately $30,000, for a total of $75,810 available by year-end 1983. The total City match of $62,437 would therefore be available from the Park Reserve Fund. No other projects on the current 5-year Parks Capital improvement Plan (CIP) require a significant park reserve contribution before 1984. However, if this situation changes when the City Council considers the 1982-86 Parks CIP, the City Council could consider asking the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to appropriate a portion of the City match for the grant application from its anticipated year-end (1982) balance of $98,765. The current parks CIP also pro- vides for a $5,000 grant from the Watershed District for this project which will be investigated. Requested Action: Authorize appropriate City staff to prepare, execute and submit a grant application for funding from the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LAWCON) and the Legislative Commission for Minnesota Resources (LCMR) for fiscal year 1983, the project to pro- vide for the development of Levee Drive Park with a grant of $43,687 and anticipated City contribution of $62,437 from the Park Reserve Fund. JA:cu 7 ,k, 1 N CO 1 NU N 0 OU M CT `O o M if) o M N qq��� X11 N q�� s.0 C-7 gi. . ;:4 ,.Q ,�V �.} EA-N -it Ef;_ 4f;_ a Q 4.1 00.8 g aN, � � g1.4 g HM if1 if1 00 n Ge 'j �° �g tfl N ii.-.2 N g •f7 00 Q }o 6F}, E<}N E in .E,)- -GA- Ef+ W _ r-; W ," W• .w aC �o � g ° i°p , 1-- 1---1 •3 ER- N O N N N U N O N 00 ‘,0H +� 00 k.0X11 (T r--4 d U a O E N it1 Q f-: t\ Q M M a O ,---i SC Ems- ,--I M M V � . C) 3 '-I I-- (a.4 ." EFF cj Ef}I ER-3 E 3 EA- ER- g E, 0 in if) u1 u-) Lr1 2 U .� d C/7 0 1x 0 w 4-) VI O O 00 CV 2 O '4 M N. H H ER- -EA- 4R- E13- 4/"+- . 0 r-1 cn •cl AOa G G H � •a E�� O 0 U RI J...1 .� 0}ct � 8,-4jcn CD• g rte+ . 1x c) . 1.) U U U W MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Firemen' s Annual Physicals DATE: April 12,. 1982 Introduction City Council , at its May 5 , 1981 meeting, received a memo from the City Administrator dated April 29 , 1981 regarding the above subject . The recommendation in the memo was to replace annual physicals with an annual "physical exertion exercise" by having firemen perform typical fire fighting tasks that require physical exertion. Council asked that staff bring back some specifics on the proposed program. Background Six cities surveyed had pre-employment physicals like Shakopee , but as indicated in the April 29 , 1981 memo, none of the six area cities surveyed had an annual physical or even an annual physical exertion test . Even though the other cities did not have an annual exam, staff feels that it is a valid exercise and the Fire Depart- ment has put together a trial program to replace annual medical physicals . The trial program will be given over a period of several months with 4-6 men being run through five -typical fire fighting tasks to insure that they can handle the tasks physically. The list of tasks is attached with the form we are using. Dr. John Joula, Shakopee Medical Center Family Practice , is interested in this and has helped us review the program to make it more effective. With Dr. Joula ' s suggestions , we expect the program to evolve into a worthwhile program as we work through the trial period. Dr. Joula did not feel that the annual physical was beneficial for firemen under the age of 40 and is sending us a schedule for physical exams . In addition, he cautioned us that if someone were to have heart problems , etc . while doing the exercise we could be exposed to some liability since no other area departments seem to be doing it . I checked with Rod Krass and he suggested calling it a fitness test and he agreed with Dr. Joula that notmaking it mandatory might be helpful . Then he suggested I contact our insurance carrier. Sue, at Capesius , said that the exercise was an excellent idea , that the employer is entitled to the information, and that our workmen' s compensation and accident insurance would cover any injuries that occurred during the administration of the fitness test . She also said that the City ' s excellent experience rating could be protected by the test because firemen unable to perform the exercises could then file a workmen' s compensation form for a "physically impaired person" which would provide further protection for the City ' should there be an accident in the future to that indi- vidual . 7 Mayor and City Council Page Two April 12 , 1982 Alternatives 1 . Re-institute the annual physicals . 2 . Proceed with the development of the annual physical fitness test . 3 . Drop the physicals and the physical fitness tests altogether. Recommendation After talking to Sue , I strongly recommend alternative #2 for the reasons listed above . The test will not be mandatory but a doctor ' s letter will be required from those not taking it . Action Requested Continue requiring a physical for new volunteer firemen, dispense with annual physicals , and direct staff to continue development of an annual physical fitness test for the firemen using the attached form. JKA/jms Shakopee Fire Department SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA 55379 '‘tjf 1982 FITNESS TEST Test Administration Guidelines 1 . PURPOSE. The annual fitness test is designed to insure that all active firemen can perform five typical fire fighting tasks that he can expect to encounter at a fire in Shakopee. 2 . Each fireman will be told that the five exercises below will be conducted without timing and at the individual ' s own speed. 3 . Each fireman will be told that he is to inform the training officer of any chest pains or similar problem both during and after the five exercises . 4. Each fireman will be tested when a minimum of five firemen are present along with the training officer. 5. Each fireman will be told to check the schedule for recommended physical check-ups posted on the department bulletin board. 6 . Any fireman choosing not to take the department ' s fitness test must provide the department with a letter from his doctor saying that he can perform the five tasks included in the fitness test . 7 . Firemen unable to perform the five exercises will be assisted in filing the proper workman's compensation forms for physically impaired persons with the City' s workman' s compensation carrier. Fitness Exercises The following must be done wearing full fire gear: Good Fair Poor 1 . Must climb ladder truck, ladder fully extended and at a 60 degree angle . 2 . Must be able to carry a person 100 feet . 3 . Must carry 100 pounds of weight up a ladder that is extended 15 feet above surface . 4. Must carry 50 feet of 21 inch hose , 150 feet . 5 . Must crawl 50 feet on belly, and then 50 feet on your knees wearing gear as stated, and Scott airpaks . • Fireman Francis J. Ries Training Officer Shakopee Volunteer Fire Dept . CPC./ MEMO TO : John K. Anderson City Administrator ' • FROM : H. R. Spurrier City Engineer RE: Eastview 1st Addition Imp vements Project No. 1980-2 DATE : April 15, 1982 Introduction : On April 6, 1982 City Council authorized the Assistant City Attorney to make a specific offer to Richard Knutson, Inc. , contractor for Schedule 1 of the above-referenced project. Background : The Assistant City Attorney has completed negotiations with the Attorney for Richard Knutson, Inc. , and has reached the settlement proposed April 6, 1982. That settlement provides for the payment of the original retainage of $5,654.41 , the restoration of liquidated damages in the amount of $1, 900. 00 for a total $7, 554. 41 and that interest be paid on that amount at a rate of 5. 25 percent compounded daily for 277 days. The total interest amounts to $306. 18. The total payment to the contractor is $7,860. 59. It is the recommendation of City staff that this amount be authorized to be paid by City Council. Action Requested : Adopt Resolution No. 1997, A Resolution Accepting Work On The 1980-2 Public Improvement ProGra.m - Eastview 1st Addition (Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer and Watermain) . HRS/jiw Attachments • CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION CONTRACT NO. : 80-2 DATE : April 15, 1982 PROJECT DESCRIPTION : Eastview 1st Addition Improvements (Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer and Watermain) CONTRACTOR: Richard Knutson, Inc. 201 Traveler's Trail Burnsville, MN 55337 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 172,365.25 QUANTITY CHANGE AMOUNT $ -0- CHANGE ORDER NO, THRU NO. AMOUNT , , , $ -0- FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 151,088.25 LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS $ 143, 533.84 7, 554.41 FINAL PAYMENT + 306. 18 (interest accrued) $ 7,860.59 I , hereby certify that the above described work was inspected under my direct supervision and that, to the best of my belief and knowledge, I find that the same has been fully completed in all respects according to the contract, together with any modifications approved by City Council , I, therefore, recommend above specified final payment be made to the above named Contractor, cl--, ' - A.. 2--: ---. _ Profefslrntl Enginee SEMI-FINAL f O' PARTIAL ESTIMATE VOUCHER Contract No. SO-2 Partial Estimate Voucher No. `4 Period Ending: April 15, 1982 TO: Contractor Richard Knutson, Inc. Address 201 Travelers Trail, Burnsville, MN 55337 Project Description Eastview Addition 1. Original Contract Amount $ 172,365.25 2. Change Order No. Thru No. $ -0- 3. Total Funds Encumbered ,j; 172,365.25 4. Value of Work Completed $ 151,088.25 — _ Value of work 5 remaining 5. Percent Retainmc $ 7, 554.41 $ None 6. Previous Payments $ 143, 533.84 Percent Complete 100 Percent 7. Deductions or Charges $ -0- 8. Total $ 151.088.25 Payment Due (Line 4 - Line 8) $ -0- CERTIFICATE OI' PAYMENT (I, We) hereby agree that the quantity and LIrr,• ,r wi;rl. :.lronna herein i:; ;r. fair c:;tint to of the work completed to date. CONTRACTOR: 4?(Adrri e ttAk$0✓1).Tf}C REVIEWED BY SHAKOPEE PUBLIC C , - U`I'1 LITIES COMMISSION ii?: .�IL1/40 t�A.-gyp TITLE: Tc12CL -tt,r .r /Xt,c A 1 ar ;err I'1'1')1'ED - CITY F SHAKOPE1 ,,,,,z-. /- ----74/ — -- --2._____L_ P • P2_____ 1):11.o C t Eng,ineei ' I Li City Admini.t ator -P-V-07,vr ,e- ...5 i - f.•••""I/1 f•-•--...,JI-••(....(..... I .. (-). -C.• ,- 7 PROPOSAL SCHEDULE T t. a-- - s/ . PROJECT NAME f. t '" '"' / 4'. OwNER -,- ile.v ------/--- _____ _. ...____........_ (.. ,"/ /i.c' _S. TYPE OF WORE _____: pi?0J. NO. __ SHEET IOF - i 1 Em . CONTRACT ITEM UNIT UNIT CONTRACT ----__ . ..__ NO. PRI CI. QUANTITY AMOUNT ___ 0, ,. / - e."_ '///, 7- ,-- -;• /.....),,/ / /..; ______ CI:, e2., -.7 5<:.•L.,.) e--- C 0 -e:-) L,r-. .D. 0 c --I ; (I, ?),,-.±276.0 c., 6097.->.0 L.' r- I 0.c 0 L.)-7,:_, i 0 t .vs.c.,c /f -- -) (.... 17. tt . 2S ?. (., 961C. °'-, e 8 8 (zi•_. c.)1_ i 44_) L ,1 , k . ,,-...-:, -, ,.; -2,8.;2.cc:--- •-::-.. 5 ) cf... c% - L) t .1. I .? (.)c •1 (3 A po.(-)(.) --- (Z) 1, •r ( .). . .', (...,.. k .,, (.... .....'...." . Co) (. i—: 8 0.t.r• 0 — ) , 0 L. . 1(:). -1. t; .::.' (A 7 2. Go - , Cf._•:- k ci- ) L. .1 1(..-•.(%(_, ."...;c , --I C--i C.J•0(.., ---..------ C, ..:::.-, is.0 c I.:_ -r.: )C c. A•-/A.--t I (2 r-,.) . : •\i • 1-7.c,c ( 1 ,....)CJ "1• `i--:.:`T,(-•:,•c-,c.-: i A i l`...s:c_ci.e,c.., i 4 I \ E Ki . 01) ii- (0‘Je,-- - • • (4k.,.Ci c ..,,ei P-244.C)< --3 C.) ‘ b 0. Cc ; '1'. P • - - -1 '7',..-,,.-..../k C CI .V •- I ..1 •/ (.,e. ,-,,-. ,._,,... , ,,-( EK -3 A. t•-k i i .1 ..--.1)1).()( , \ -47:4..e..).60 I .._-- -H -16.cc:: .....1 ' ' ° 1.7-• 1•• ",: Q(-. . ''..D...-A....I (C.. 4-.) c -2_;••;<_) .c)c: 1-_-::: -.•.•.1 '7--,0.C.c.. ‘1.7; 2.1:;(:). CKJ • •SA-c‘i 4A- , oi- L. ''..-.). ' ) L(: i c0,0 .C( ._.. _ _----- i 7 c,.TA i_ p/k. w c p, 1 11 • ; I ; . . PROPOSAL SCHEDULE q' : .::.. , . z1 ,-, _ _ ;i :,- PROJECT NAME _Z-4:- /L/‘ e:e /___ ' 5_r 1 7 7/.rif: OWNER __ 1" TYPE OF WORK 6-1/` / ' 74;.e -5 PROJ. NO. _ SHEET 2 OF _______ 11 E.Ni CONTRACT ITEM UNIT UNI 1 CONTRACT - -- - -------- NO. PRI CE Ci UA N T1 Ty AMOUNT - /--.?-• ,-- 7 2- (4./a 14---.7-h-, /^-, ----- . • z .le--. 0. .0 7 4- ) -) AZ..?C..'C.L E.-C. ..../fr"..4 7-/ I--,I, 6. /--/e)e:. : (.. -c . I'•-•-, J'eJc")•0.3 -7_,Cx 147(2.e.) (-1Wfr--, 7/, ,, Z .6. /. C r• .,:-?... ..c-, 2 e-16(I,oG / .37'7) 1 3 7 •ck •. 1 /2 ' / c L./.z //, (--7 ..,.-.:- 4.--., / " .,,.-, I c Vi, /v e t-.-7,. i-,6.,6).t•,,,-, ,,- /300. °`:-'• 9 i,, _... , x (. ({,lz / 7 A C. . S. _96 l'.•-l:c_. / : 41 7,../ c''' /1"16 5 t.',I. 4/11..- t--„./. /4„..t.e.e;e l --_, .3 .2) —3/4 - -0,-pe,,-, 7- - t-z2 . /2.6 -1; .,....... y4 4/ /sew.e d 1'- 7) --1,06e.:).Cc. .74, 6/4 /C° '' /2 ti / ,.... --TV,.(1 i •. , 1-) -')-1 1 L.I., L.el- 2:- , ei .4 *-7 2 3,-;c).c‘c, ..4. 7 '2*I 4;(-)•(-1)c- .b (• 3/4 ,c__c, 15 L..-- ,..../ .(....‹...... L-.F. -4 .6--e-) i c s---3 f: -‘.; LT, C,c ?6) S- 7 i ) c....., vu,....... I ,...L'' t3 L." C i<3 . ,-- ' -roe, ,se . c\ 4.-1,-7 (-1,--; 6.3 (•2 c:.- .5-A A-) . 0 IS-60.0e t 140a. c c_, 1 icSoo• <)0 0 LA V,C. .:_i k i.:3.--, .,•1/4-I -5"tt i k ce ek7 .---k-(.._ 1 A - ,(2._ 1 1.-'..} (,1-.--;iLA4. a'; ii, 6 1 I , • PROPOSAL SCHEDULE PROJECT NAME .ef'`;jf! fC.L-�- S /�� - OwNF R c/ , TYPE OF wORK �. � •_ -__ PR OJ NO. _ SHEET 3.OF — ITEM CONTRACT ITEM UNIT...-`UNIT _ - --_0N —'- ONT __ Pit ICI: QUANTITY AMOUNT /1-::?-;,- 74 L"- -er.-3-i .Sc'C z/e v 30 it:LiCL S ( o - e.) c ,1 2.cc -i z•-) /GC-0. 00 34., /S/Z.ao J 36 RC.P C.( ? c G._ i + L E . 2z_o.ce 4 e 6. u0 -3 CD(oO. oe: ---I (•z--(- (- C. L 3 l •( ,1-.c c, -_ C--•:.>C_,.c:U .Z 4 •--7 co .v c.y, k-1. CI() C. 7Gt).c;G /33 22Co\ -a< 4„-4-e_ L 8 6. ;, McL�.lti�,cc ''5A c;c --1-1/4.112 c c...,,,_<.___1__,_ E A. '7` o l -7 7. c. c a I '7 2 o. o I`'1 I o e E • -7Z v, c e ( -7 O.« 1. -72 o.c> o .-2.-i\, :cJ F-. E . S. Lot 6!..IV;., i C • TVekSL. Lv6- _'--A Cr_ b . 73 0.c° I 7 ...?, 3 60 k 730. 00 \‘. 4 .1---) Z4 T. e . S . t...w , Lt.1 V ,;.. ,-.1c, E (c C�iC • Co ( L.`-7p. cio • Tv--c, 5 I. L.) vti,—c( to-io.ov LI-) I F (0 .` C- o,t , o ( l)cU 4-c.. e_ n - Z4-U .;.00 Z. 48CC.).Go ._� Z a:p _t, c c, i� Hl✓ eIti4.. ct L• L.'. co.C;C> (..".2 ) .Qt.;c;v.oG j v ZGvO. Gu 5'wy . `T --iA L- ei,12 l C. 2-71 I t 4-.G 3 ®I 1- 0 A j eel Flew 60n:f4,-o Et. 2-;c CL 1 z';C• t 6 1 I 2S6 .6u ( _, u .4_c � 13y4,oc I i L;(/ J Tc-u3 -4t t,c e,.-z4 RESOLUTION NO. 1997 A Resolution Accepting Work On The 1980-2 Public Improvement Program Eastview 1st Addition (Sanitary .Sewer, Storm Sewer and Watermain) WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Shakopee on June 10, 1980, Richard Knutson, Inc. , 201 Travelers Trail, Burnsville, MN 55337 has satisfactorily completed the improvements of Eastview 1st Addition by Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer and Watermain, in accordance with such contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby directed to issue a proper order forthe final payment on such contract in the amount of $7, 860. 59, taking the contractor's receipt in full. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1982. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST : City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1982. City Attorney 9'10 MEMO TO : John K . Anderson City Administrator -'). FROM; H. R. Spurrier City Engineer RE: Valley Industrial Boulevard South\- ounty Road 83 to the East Line of Valley Park 2nd Acl ition - mprovement No. 1982-2 DATE: April 16, 1982 Introduction : Plans and Specifications have been completed for the above-referenced project. Background : City Council has ordered the above-referenced Plans and Specifications and directed staff to proceed with all convenient speed in the construction of Valley Industrial Boulevard South. In this project City will receive bids for the project, hold the public hearing for the assessment and then award the contract. Based on this schedule, the assessment hearing for the above-referenced project would be held on June 15th. It is the recommendation of City staff that City Council approve the Plans and Specifications and order the Advertisement for Bids. Action Requested : Adopt Resolution No. 2000, A Resolution Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Advertisement For Bids - Valley Industrial Boulevard South, County Road 83 To The East Line Of Valley Park 2nd Addition, Improvement No. 1982-2. HRS/jiw Attachment 9 { RESOLUTION NO. 2000 A Resolution Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Advertisement For Bids Valley Industrial Boulevard South County Road 83 To The East Line Of Valley Park 2nd Addition Improvement No. 1982-2 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 1985, adopted by City Council on February 16, 1982 Henry R. Spurrier, City Engineer, has prepared Plans and Specifications for the improvement of Valley Industrial Boulevard South County Road 83 To The East Line of Valley Park 2nd Addition by roadway and has presented such Plans and Specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1 . Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file and of record in the Office of the City Engineer, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an Advertisement for Bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The Advertisement for Bids shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Clerk until 10:30 A.M. on May 17, 1982 at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Clerk and the Engineer, or their designated party, will then be tabulated and will be considered by Council at 7:30 P.M. , or thereafter on May 18, 1982 in the Council Chambers and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the order of the City of Shakopee for not less than five (5) percent of the amount of the bid. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1982. MEMO TO : John K . Anderson City Administrator FROM : H. R. Spurrier City Engineer RE: Roadway East of County Ro d 89 in the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 115S, Range 22W, Scott County Minnesota DATE: April 15, 1982 Introduction : Attached is a copy of the petition from property owners served by a private drive in the above-referenced area of Shakopee. Background : The petition has been reviewed by the City Attorney and approved and the petition contains signature of more than 35 percent of the property owners benefitting by the proposed improvement, as noted in the attached memoranda. Therefore, it is the recommendation of City staff that City Council adopt attached Resolution No. 1999, A Resolution Declaring the Adequacy Of The Petition and Ordering the Preparation of a Report for the above-captioned project. Action Requested : Adopt Resolution No. 1999, A Resolution Declaring The Adequacy Of A Petition And Ordering The Preparation Of A Report For The Improvement Of Roadway Serving The Lots Of Record East Of County Road 89 In The Northeast Quarter Of Section 13, Township 115 South, Range 22 West, Scott County, Minnesota. HRS/jiw Attachments MEMO TO : John K. Anderson City Administrator FROM : Don 'Steger City Planner RE: Residential Development - Maras Road DATE: April 16, 1982 At the April 15, 1982 meeting, the Shakopee Planning Commission reviewed a request by a property owner located in the residential development along Maras Road. The discussion lead to the following recommendation to the City Council : "No future Building Permits in the residential development should be issued until the road issue is solved (road be made public) . DS/jiw . , • 1 0 •,' 0 ,t? 1... 1 II 1 •e . 1 - ---T- -4 csi co 0.•.___., -... 2 .... I I, CV . 11W-4.1.111111011111010 .... °I 111WNII / :•:•:•:•:•:•:••••••:•:•:•:•:•:•:.:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:;•• . / •••:•:•:•:•:•:•:::•:•:•:•:•:•:•••••••:•:•°.•:•••:••• .• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • __. •••••••• \ ..- .• . A • 1111, 41 ____ :•:•:•:•* :::::•:::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:••••••••••••••" •:•:•:•:: • • ••• •'••••••••••••••••••••••••:. • 1 1._______). / sip •-.-... • 1::::.:;:;.• :::::::::::::.:::.:.::.:::.:.::::::•:•:•:•:•.• ..-.,.. ....••••• . . .. Et 1:1 :•:•::::: ...X...* —........--... :...,.! 4 CI I ...... •:::..... ,- r.—"- . 0,1 ' 2 41 • .... ... ...• ... B9 . . .• • •• .o . .....: . . tx co . , . H I • ,„ w I re) 0 ,- .- Au a --- u. I- o 0 - a 0 '1"- U) 4 . u. 0 W Q • . - 1/11 V) <0==............. >- 0 I- _ i •4° U.VILC-3 : i------ 0 W 0 CA I CC z I 2 N4 1 t ,.• •e. •^,A, •, 4• I f 0 ':•,,,'- . •'`.1,11-;t:' ''''4.';:•' 4-4; '41'' '` 44'• t o — —-- — _ ---t— - ------ -- —I - al 6v 1 ii___ .., ... ., 1 // - : ,,. ; 4 4•, A 1 '. •0+) 1 i;“ . . i i i. • 1 ....A...• 2 1 c ?I hv'' a • MEMO TO : Bo Spurrier City Engineer FROM : Ray ;Ruuska Engineering Coordinator RE : Petition for Public Improvements - Maras Road DATE : March 3, 1982 Of the people who signed this petition, only two are Contract for Deed owners. The remaining thirteen are fee owners. Total frontage is approximately 6051 L.F. ; fee owners front 3534 L.F. The two Contract for Deed petitioners front 300 L.F. Petitioners who are fee owners front 58 percent of the total. There are a total of 25 lots serviced by this road. Fourteen of these lots are owned by petitioners (fee owners) or 56 percent of the total. RR/jiw t PETITION FOR ASSESSABLE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT • CITY OF SHAKOI'L:l? , • Dace , 5 -/7g2 We , the undersigned , owners of the following described real property , abutting on the proposed improvement and beneficed thereby , hereby petition the Common Council of the City of Shakopee , for the following public improvements ; Roadway serving the lots of record, east of County Road 89 In the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 115 South, Range 22 West, Scott County, Minnesota c3cx gtX)1XiqXXXAMOtriX XXXXXXX X�C;�`i )g9{X and request chat the same be made during the year 1982 . PAYee.< t'1uu+b-er PETITIONER ) LOT 1-4.1.....-7,4442, Q e_ „ � 2. ✓ 7- 9/30 S=^Q / `e 4 ro ✓ ?„--7-17-3.-6-12.1,-c3, ,. ,F-c , ur-Y041115,„,,L. a 7 le< ginze '4712FLP— ® if ...z .z:i.L .,..5._.--±11._::Q,,z4—2 v Fee c/Y1/1-6. -t,L / . `U __0' ' V7.7—ti( - 5210-04. Fee �' L . i (AMPY --z-3—.--A-1-crz-k--. . 3,7 44 .-g7,./a...4,--2„.174 e ° 27-cri -57`F-T-T z"Sid: 3 2. i- � E '� J�/� , �r -2J -9r - SLri- S-0 ' I ee ' i't , / • A ) 'o `°'o•Z,17-it 3-514/-6Z.7-00 1 Gil t-.,�,��-c ,/ . .#, t t '2,7-ill" -'"gal�.-a ,-p trc II /c ✓ 7-913o 0 G7) J!/,✓ / �� V-Z,?..�. . f-o`�l -CC) --.-t--) �f �._ \' '' la - a ,,_ L 0x/7-1-4t3- z-9 `°ir i---.: , tic;' C't�."P'\ . AA, I,-e5-a 16 -OaCa - I , here .y, verify that 1 c. rculaced the ab e p cition and chat , c .e above signatures of the property o ►ners and eticioners were affixed in my presence . - 2?- 9t -s2to -oo ( -6 I lev'‘Lit/Lid nd-A-441nn.,..._________ Circulator Approved this day of , 19 City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 1999 A Resolution Declaring The Adequacy Of Petition And Ordering Preparation Of Report For The Improvement Of Roadway Serving The Lots Of Record East Of County Road 89 In The Northeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 115 South, Range 22 West Scott County, Minnesota BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. A certain petition requesting the improvement of roadway serving the lots of record East of County Road 89 in the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 115 South, Range 22 West, Scott County Minnesota, filed with the Council on March 1, 1982, is hereby declared to be signed by the required percentage of owners of property affected thereby. The declaration is made in conformity to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429. 035. 2. The petition is hereby referred to Henry R. Spurrier, City Engineer, and he is Hstructed to report to the Council will convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement and estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of 1982. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST : City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1982. City Attorney c %1 -1'. . 11:ZI "'''k City of Shakopee K o p POLICE DEPARTMENT `'' N ff '1'// S.. \NNE SpT 4`\C1 `�`f �'' " i � 1,i 476 South Gorman Street ' ' SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 .0 , , 411.;"1'' p TeL 445.6666 j •' 55374 1 Y*--,,,3' off TO: Mayor , Council Members FROM: Tom Brownell, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Unclaimed/Excess Property Auction DATE: April 13, 1982 INTRODUCTION City Code 2 . 70 authorizes the disposal of Unclaimed/Excess Property. The Police Department accumulates stolen property which remains unclaimed due to a lack of owner identifica- tion and requires a public sale for disposal. The City also has items which are no longer serviceable nor of use to other City Departments through transfer. All proceeds less costs are credited to the general fund. BACKGROUND On May 22 , 1982 , the City of Shakopee and Scott County will conduct a joint public auction. Upon adoption of a resolution, a description of the unclaimed property will be published as public notice in an effort to return property to the legal owner prior to the sale. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Pass resolution. go �E2CTE a, ZOtECt RECOVERED/ABANDONED BICYCLES MAKE COLOR SIZE 1. Schwinn Red B-27 2 . Iverson 3 speed Green B-27 3. Columbia 3 speed Blue B-26 4. Hawthorne Blue G-20 5. Unknown Gray B-20 6. Coast King Yellow _ B-26 7. Huffy Thunder Trail Yellow/Black B-20 8. Schwinn 5 speed Gold G-27 9. Schwinn 5 speed Red B-27 10 . Coast to Coast White G-20 11. Vista 10 speed Brown B-27 12 . Sears Orange B-27 13 . Huffy 10 speed Purple B-26 14. AMF Roadmaster 10 speed Salmon B-26 15. Sears Blue B-26 16 . Unknown Blue B-20 17. Coast to Coast Red B-20 18 . Huffy Strider 10 speed Silver B-26 19. Huffy Pro Thunder Repainted red B-20 20 . K-Mart All-Pro Red G-20 21. Unknown 3 speed Brown G-26 22 . Schwinn Continental 10 speed Green B-27 23 . Raleigh Green G-26 24 . Bicycle frame Black B-20 25. AMF Junior Tricycle Red 26. Tiger bicycle frame Black 27. AMF Scorcher frame Orange 28. Bicycle frame Black B-20 29. Wards bicycle frame Gold 30 . Phillips bicycle frame Maroon 31. Misc. Bike tire and rim 32 . Hawthorne 3 speed Blue B-26 33. K-Mart All-Pro Green G-26 34. Schwinn 10 speed Blue B-26 35. Unknown Red B-26 36 . Ross 3 speed Brown B-26 37. Columbia Blue/White G-26 RECOVERED/ABANDONED PROPERTY 2 Kawasaki jet skits 1 National cash register 1 Magnavox Odyssey cassette player 1 All-American sled 1 Hodaka motorcycle engine 1 Yamaha 350 motorcycle minus engine j SURPLUS PROPERTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1 1969 Ford 1 ton pickup truck, SER/F10APE90388 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1 Broken swivel chair, property no. 0117 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 1 Adding machine, Olivette 10 key POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 Kodak X-15 Instamatic cameras 1 Polaroid camera, model 420, property no. 0912 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT 8 Stand ash trays 1 Gas burner RESOLUTION NO. 1995 A Resolution Authorizing the Disppsal of Unclaimed Property WHEREAS, the Shakopee Police Department of the City of Shakopee has had property in its possession for more than sixty (60) days, which property remains unclaimed by the owner; and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee desires to dispose of said property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, hereby declares the attached list of Unclaimed Property, dated April 20, 1982, described certain property abandoned property and that the appropriate City officials are hereby authorized and directed to dispose of said property pursuant to Section 2. 70 , Subdivision 2, of the Shakopee City Code. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1982. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1982. ?i2-2 MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Resolution No. 1998 ,"Deferring 1982 Payable Special Assessments on Property Designated "Green Acres". DATE: April 15, 1982 This resolution is to enable the County to correct tax statements issued on "Green Acre" property. Once a tax statement is issued, Council action is needed to make changes related to special assessments. GV/ljw RESOLUTION NO. 1998 A RESOLUTION, DEFERRING 1982 PAYABLE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PROPERTY DESIGNATED "GREEN ACRES" WHEREAS, various property in the City of Shakopee is classified as "Green Acres"; and WHEREAS, "Green Acre" property is entitled to special assessment levies deferred until reclassification, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that special assessment principal and interest payable in 1982 on property classified as "Green Acre" is deferred until the property ceases to be "Green Acres". Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1982. • Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1982. City Attorney /D& i MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Revenue Sharing Hearing DATE: April 14, 1982 Council has a public hearing scheduled for 8:30 P.M. on April 20th, 1982. The purpose of the hearing is to receive public comments on proposed uses of Revenue Sharing funds before the Administrator forwards the budget changes to Council for adoption. At that time, a second hearing has to be held on the actual budget changes in order to comply with regulation. GV/ljw JEROME JASPERS & COMPANY /0 )3 3C( /un/r H/n ‘1t NHt HN O! 1111 \MtKII'AN INSI-Il UT:1)F 206 S(WI SERF t.T II HIM!I)1'l Ill It V((Y)I'NIANI S NIIAKOPt.F,MIs NtSO1A 55719 JFKOMI.JASPFIts.C.P.A. l t.11P11()%1.:. (612)44S-21411 i45tI STREEF1.AND.Jr.(',P.A. April 13 , 1982 Members of the City Council City of Shakopee Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 MANAGEMENT LETTER Dear Council Members : As we stated in our engagement letter, we would make separate recommendations for strengthening internal controls and improving operating procedures . We have now .completed the examination of your financial statements and at this time make the following recommen- dations to you. 1 . Accounting Manual (SOP ' s) We recommend that the accounting manual started in 1981 be completed in its entirety. If accounting procedures and policies are clearly stated in writing, the policies set by management can be enforced efficiently and consistently. Uniform handling of like transactions is essential to the production of reliable accounting records and reports , and uniformity in the handling of transactions is possible only when definite patterns for pro- cessing routine transactions are made known to all the accounting staff. 2 . Accounts Receivable and Billing We recommend that controls are adopted to insure that all services performed are billed and recorded. The following con- ditions are indicative of satisfactory control over billing and receivables : A. Billings are to be serially numbered invoices . B. All documents supporting billings are also to be serially numbered. • - 2 - /6 � C. Detailed receivable records are periodically (monthly) balanced with general ledger control accounts . D. An aged trial balance of receivables is periodically (monthly) prepared ,and followup action is taken on overdue balances . E . Duties are adequately separated so that the individual responsible for maintaining the receivable records does not have access to cash and to authorize performance of services . Part A and E are currently in operation as well as part of D re- garding follow up action on overdue balances . We are pleased with the results of implemention of the fixed asset accounting system and the purchasing system which were installed by your administration in 1981. We wish to thank you for the opportunity of serving you and we look forward to an enjoyable and continuing association in service to you. Yours truly, erome Jaspe & Company gg /U b . yr / / of' s CtKD /Pe /r° r e- 71..1 C f/ e d h e , R # 17.1RIs � / d /Qf_S o I n eco s fOb Rot 6e1N copied )1fle. , Re ?oe�. 5 'tailed ALSO e!SewlilQE 1u eiTy RzeoRD3 , g)fMEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre , Administrative Assistant RE: List of Grants Available DATE: April 12 , 1982 Introduction The attached list entitled "Federal Assistance Available to City as Applicant" has been prepared in response to the City Council ' s request to have a comprehensive list of available grants . Background The prepared list , although lengthy, is not comprehensive. Items on the list are exerpts from the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assist- ance and therefore refer only to federal programs . This 1063 page document was reviewed with an attempt to identify all federal pro- grams for which a municipality might directly apply. You will note that of the approximate 133 listings , only 72 are for grant pro- grams . Other listings include categories such as loans , technical assistance , advisory services , etc . Due to the organization of the Catalog it was decided not to limit listings to grant programs . An attempt was made not to prejudge whether any type of assistance was appropriate for Shakopee , but only to exerpt all programs for which the City might apply, leaving the judgment of which programs to pursue to the City Council . Some of the programs listed may not actually be available to the City upon further investigation. How- ever it was impossible to research 133 programs thoroughly, so further investigation will be undertaken for those programs con- sidered by City Council to have potential to meet City objectives . Funding for all of these programs is not assured for 1982 , but all have been listed anyway, acknowledging that budget decisions already made may preclude funding under some programs in 1982 . Additional programs listed in the Catalog have been identified in two other categories : 1 ) federal assistance available to State or other level of government , with possible pass through to the City; and 2 ) federal assistance for individuals or private organizations with possible impact on the City. An example of the later is the 235 Mortgage Program. An example of the former is the State Economic Opportunity Office funded by the federal Community Services Adminis- tration. Federal funds to State offices may eventually sift down to local communities as grants or assistance . These two types of programs have not been provided in the attached list , in order for Council to react to the format of the existing list before extensive additional staff time is expended. Two additional lists will be typed for City Council review at the request of the Council . Of all the programs listed, I have starred four. Three I definitely recommended to the City: 14. 219 Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) 15 . 916 Land and Water Conservation Fund (LAWCON) 21 . 300 Revenue Sharing l° John K. Anderson April 12 , 1982 Page Two These are all programs the City has tapped for funding in the past , and I think all will continue to help the City undertake projects it wants to do, with or without grants . The additional program I have starred is 14. 226 , Innovative CDBG, Secretary' s Discretionary Fund. This program may or may not have funding for 1982 , but could be considered if the City undertakes an innovative block grant project . I do not recommend any of the other grants unless the City wishes to enter a new functional area. Most of the assistance programs avail- able for law enforcement are utilized by the City now. Some personnel- related programs would help the City with its ongoing programs , and some such as CETA, have been used in the past . However many other funded areas such as transportation, pollution control , energy, educa- tion, arts , etc . have not been undertaken by the City of Shakopee in the past . Budget cutbacks by other agencies have meant a loss of services , and the City may wish to try and fill the void through involvement with new programs . However even if grants are received to take on certain functions , it is likely additional City funds would also be necessary either as a match for grant funds or to con- tinue the program after grant funds are expended. Therefore it is a policy decision to apply for any of these grants , and the decision will have ongoing financial repercussions . A similar review of grants available from private sources was attempted. However most private foundations do not have a formal application process or deadline . Grantsmanship with private foundations involves reviewing prior grants awarded -and the stated focus of the foundation, and designing grant proposals compatible with these trends . Such a review showed no trend of grants awarded to local government . Dis- cussion with informed sources suggested that public-private coopera- tion is a very new phenomenon and past trends do not exist as a model for future activity. Recent involvement of the McKnight Founda- tion with housing and jobs in the Cities of Minneapolis and St . Paul was initiated by the foundation, not the cities ! Therefore a list of grant opportunities will not be prepared, but brainstorming of possible innovative approaches to private foundations will be made and presented to the City Council at a later date . Recommended Action 1 . Review attached grants list and direct staff to provide further information on any grants which may potentially help to accomp- lish activities desired by the City Council . 2 . Determine whether City Council would like a similar listing of federal funding for individuals or the State to fund activities which may help to achieve City objectives . JA/jms C/ FEDERAL ASSISTANCE AVAILABLE TO CITY AS APPLICANT SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 10 . 901 RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES : To assist local people in initiating and carrying out long-range program of resource conservation and development for purposes of achieving a dynamic rural community with satis- factory level of income and pleasing environment , and creating a favorable investment climate attractive to private capital . TYPE OF AID: Grants ; Advisory Services . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local governments and nonprofit organizations with authority to plan or carry out activities relating to resource use and development in multi jurisdictional areas . This program is available in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION : FY 82 est . $26 ,812 ,000 - $2 ,000 to $250 ,000 ; average $50 ,000. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING-FEDERAL HOUSING COMMISSIONER 14. 146 LOW INCOME HOUSING-ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (PUBLIC HOUSING) OBJECTIVES : To provide decent , safe and sanitary housing and related facilities for families of low income through an autho- rized Public Housing Agency (PHA) or Indian Housing Authority ( IHA) . TYPE OF AID: Direct Loans ; Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Public Housing Agencies ( including Indian Housing Authorities ) established by a local government in accord- ance with State law, authorized public agencies , or Indian tribal organizations are eligible . The proposed program must be approved by the local governing body. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Families and single persons of low income, including single persons who are elderly, disabled, handicapped, displaced; or the remaining member of a tenant family is also eligible . -2- r 6 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Use of appropriation to liquidate con- tract authority) ( Includes obligations for 14. 147 and 14. 148 ) FY 82 est . $2 , 793 ,600 ,000. 14. 156 LOWER-INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OBJECTIVES : To aid lower-income families in obtaining decent , safe and sanitary housing in private accommodations and to promote economically mixed existing, newly constructed , and substantially and moderately rehabilitated housing. TYPE OF AID: Direct Payments for Specified Use ; Project Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Any private owner ( profit-motivated and nonprofit ) , cooperative , or an authorized Public Housing Agency (any State , County, municipality or other governmental entity or public body (or agency or instrumentality thereof) which is authorized to engage in or assist in the development or opera- tion of housing for low-income families ) . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Very low-income families (whose income does not exceed 50 percent of the median income for the area as determined by the Secretary with adjustments for smaller and larger families ) ; lower income families (whose income does not exceed 80 percent of the median income for the areas adjusted for family size ) . A very low income or lower income single person who is elderly, disabled or handicapped, displaced, or the remaining member of an eligible tenant family is also eligible . At least 30 percent of the families assisted should be very low income families with gross income not in excess of 50 percent of median income of the locality. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FY 82 est . $5 ,915 ,000,000. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT *14. 219 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/SMALL CITIES PROGRAM ( SMALL CITIES ) OBJECTIVES : To assist communities in providing decent housing and a suitable living environment , and expanded economic opportunities , principally for persons of low and moderate income. TYPE OF AID: Project Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: All States , counties , and units of general local government ( including counties ) , except metropolitan cities and urban counties or units participating in an urban county' s CDBG program, may apply for Small Cities Grant . -3- I b c/ BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: See Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (General purpose discretionary) FY 82 est . $925 ,582 ,000 . 14. 222 URBAN HOMESTEADING OBJECTIVES : To provide homeownership opportunities to individuals and families and revitalize neighborhoods . TYPE OF AID: Sale , Exchange , or Donation of Property and Goods . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: States and all units of general local government are eligible . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: The criteria for the eligibility and selection of homesteaders are set locally. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FY 82 est . $13 ,467 ,000 . *14. 226 SECRETARY' S DISCRETIONARY FUND/INNOVATIVE GRANTS PROGRAM OBJECTIVES : The Innovative Grants Program provides an opportu- nity for HUD to award grants to States and units of general local government for projects that test or demonstrate exemplary com- munity development activities or techniques . The projects to be tested or demonstrated must meet the following criteria for inno- vativeness ; ( 1 ) involve concepts , methods or devices that can be replicated by other eligible Community Development Block Grant entities without special Federal funding; ( 2 ) provide an improved way of meeting a common community development need ( i . e. , advance the state of the community development art ) ; and ( 3) meet one of the following additional criteria: (a ) be untried or unique ; or (b) have been implemented elsewhere , and the special conditions or circumstances surrounding the project warrant its consideration for funding. TYPE OF AID: Project Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Only States and units of general local government are eligible to receive innovative grants funding; however, any interested community group or other public or private organization may submit unsolicited preliminary proposals for HUD review, although such organizations are not eligible for direct funding. Full applications , when requested by HUD must be from an eligible applicant as defined in 24 CFR 570. 3 (u) and (v) . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: In accordance with regulations for the Community Development Block Grant/Entitlements cities , the pri- mary Beneficiaries with grant recipient government units are low and moderate income persons , (generally defined as families with less than 80 percent of the prevailing median family income ) . -4- l6 ci FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) Not separately identifiable . (Allocation) FY 81 est . $10 ,544 ,000 ; and FY 82 est . not available. 14. 227 SECRETARY ' S DISCRETIONARY FUND/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS (TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE) OBJECTIVES : To help States , units of general local government , Indian tribes , and areawide planning organizations to plan, devel- op, and administer local block grant and urban development action grant programs . TYPE OF AID: Project Grants (Contracts ) ; Cooperative Agreements ; Direct Payments for Specified Use . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: States , units of general local government Indian tribes , areawide planning organizations , universities , public interest groups , for-profit and not-for-non-profit organ- izations , and any other entity which can demonstrate that it possesses the capability, skill , experience , facilities , techniques and commitment to provide technical assistance. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Entities participating or actively indend- ing to participate in the planning, developing or administering of a block grant or action grant program. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) Not separately identifiable. (Allocations ) FY 81 est. $21 , 318,000 and FY 82 est. not available . OFFICE OF POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH 14. 506 GENERAL RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY ACTIVITY OBJECTIVES : To carry out applied research and demonstration pro- jects of high priority and pre-selected by the Department to serve the needs of housing and community development groups and to improve the operations of the Department ' s programs . TYPE OF AID: Project Grants (Cooperative Agreements ) . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local governments , public and/or private profit and nonprofit organizations which have authority and capacity to carry out projects . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: The annual amount obligated to research grants varies from $10,000 ,000 to $15 ,000 ,000. Range and average of Financial Assistance : $150 to $500 ,000 ; $60 ,000. U.S . FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 15 . 609 WILDLIFE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OBJECTIVES : To provide information and planned technical assist- ance to native Americans , military reservations , other State and Federal agencies , and private organizations to improve conditions for the management of wildlife resources . -5- /O C/ TYPE OF AID: Training; Advisory Services . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Indian tribes and Federal agencies are eligible to request direct aid. Public or private agencies and organizations are eligible for assistance as circumstances permit . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 81 est $350,000; and FY 82 est . $0. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 15 . 804 WATER RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS (FEDERAL-STATE COOPERATIVE PROGRAM) OBJECTIVES : To provide water information for economic develop- ment and best use of water resources and to carry on research in hydrology. TYPE OF AID: Technical Information. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: States , political subdivisions of States , and other State instrumentalities . Private groups and individuals are not eligible . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $46 ,946 ,000. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 15 . 915 TECHNICAL PRESERVATION SERVICES OBJECTIVES : To provide and disseminate information concerning methods and techniques for preserving and maintaining historic properties owned by Federal agencies and State and local govern- mentas ; to advise Federal agencies on the evaluation, preservation and maintenance of historic properties ; to evaluate applications for the transfer of surplus Federal property for historic monument purposes ; to evaluate and certify rehabilitations of certified historic structures for tax benefit purposes ; to evaluate National Park Service historic preservation grant-in-aid applications and plans and specifications to determine the appropriateness of pro- posed acquisition and development project work; and to assure con- formance with 36 CFR 1207 , the Secretary of the Interior' s Stan- dards for Historic Preservation Projects by means of application evaluation and program policy guidance . TYPE OF AID: Advisory Services and Technical Information. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Federal agencies , State and local govern- ments , and individuals . For Grants-in-Aid program, see 15 . 904 , Historic Preservation Grants-in-Aid. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. -6- FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Salaries and expenses ) FY 81 $968 ,000 ; and FY 82 est . not available . *15 . 916 OUTDOOR RECREATION - ACQUISITION, DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING (LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND GRANTS ) OBJECTIVES : To provide financial assistance to the States and their political .subdivisions for the preparation of comprehensive statewide outdoor recreation plans and acquisition and develop- ment of outdoor recreation areas and facilities for the general public , to meet current and future needs . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: For planning grants , only the State agency formally designated by the Governor or State law as responsible for the preparation and maintenance of the Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan is eligible to apply. (Treated as States in this regard are the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands , American Samoa , and Guam. ) For acquisition and development grants , the above designated agency may apply for assistance for itself , or on behalf of other State agencies or political subdivisions , such as cities , counties , and park dis- tricts . Additionally, Indian tribes which are organized to govern themselves and perform the function of a municipal government qualify for assistance under the program. Individuals and private organizations are not eligible . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: The general public . For planning grants , same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 81 est . $228 , 745 ,000 ; and FY 82 est . not available . 15 . 917 RECREATION - TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OBJECTIVES : To provide technical assistance and advice to and cooperate with States , political subdivisions , and private inter- ests , including nonprofit organizations , with respect to recrea- tion. TYPE OF AID: Training, Advisory Services . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Anyone may apply. Determination is made on the basis of relationship of National priorities and availability of staff . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 81 est . $2 , 716 ,000 ; and FY 82 est . not available . OFFICE OF WATER RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY 15 . 950 NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (FOCUSED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM) -7- (6) C/ OBJECTIVES : To support needed research and development into any aspects of water-related problems deemed desirable in the national interest including R and D relating to fresh and saline water re- sources . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Educational institutions , private founda- tions or other institutions , Federal , State and local governmental agencies , and private firms and individuals whose training, exper- ience , and qualifications are adequate for the conduct of water research or development projects . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants and contracts ) FY 81 est . $13 , 740 ,000; and FY 82 est . not available . DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION 16 . 001 LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE - NARCOTICS AND DANGEROUS DRUGS - LABORATORY ANALYSIS OBJECTIVES : To provide drug evidence analysis , expert testimony in court , and technical assistance to law enforcement agencies concerning narcotics , and other abused drugs . TYPE OF AID: Assistance available . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local governments , officials of law enforcement agencies , forensic laboratories . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $1 ,898 ,000 . 16 . 004 LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE - NARCOTICS AND DANGEROUS DRUGS TRAINING OBJECTIVES : To acquaint appropriate professional and enforcement personnel with ( 1 ) techniques in the conduct of drug investiga- tions ; ( 2 ) aspects of physical security in legitimate drug distri- bution; ( 3 ) techniques in analysis of drugs for evidential purposes ; and (4 ) pharmacology , socio-psychological aspects of drug abuse , drug education, and invesigative techniques . TYPE OF AID: Training available . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State , local military, and other Federal law enforcement and regulatory officials ; crime laboratory technicians for forensic chemists . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $2 ,077 ,000 . -8- /o 16 .005 PUBLIC EDUCATION ON DRUG ABUSE - INFORMATION OBJECTIVES : To provide to the public , law enforcement and other agencies publications and films on drug abuse prevention. TYPE OF AID: Assistance abailable . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: None . Priority is given to law enforce- ment agencies and schools . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: State and local communities and the pub- lic . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est. $423 ,000. COMMUNITY RELATIONS SERVICE 16 . 200 COMMUNITY RELATIONS SERVICE (CRS ) OBJECTIVES : To help communities and groups resolve disputes , disagreements , and difficulties arising from racial discrimination. TYPE OF AID: Assistance available . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Any person, group, community, or State or local governmental unit that seeks to alleviate tensions caused by discrimination based on race , color, or national origin may be considered for CRS assistance . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $5 , 313 ,000. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 16 . 300 LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE - FBI ADVANCED POLICE TRAINING (FBI ACADEMY, ADVANCED SPECIALIZED COURSES ) OBJECTIVES : To provide advanced training to experienced personnel of local , county, State , and selected Federal law enforcement agencies , with special emphasis on developing each graduate as a capable manager or administrator for his own department . To afford spe- cialized advanced training to the above personnel . TYPE OF AID: Training available . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Regular , full-time personnel of a criminal justice agency serving a municipality, county, local , or State , as well as some selected, qualified representative of Federal agencies having criminal justice responsibilities . Candidates must meet certian age , experience, education, physical , and character requirements . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $8,000 ,000. -9- Ci /C 16 . 302 LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE - FBI FIELD POLICE TRAINING (FBI FIELD POLICE TRAINING) OBJECTIVES : To develop the professional skills of criminal justice personnel . TYPE OF AID: Training available. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: All authorized municipal , county, local , and State criminal justice personnel . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses FY 82 est . $6 ,697 ,000 . 16 . 303 LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE - FBI FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION (FBI IDENTIFICATION DIVISION) OBJECTIVES : To serve U.S . Government and criminal justice agen- cies in identification of criminals ; and to service non-Federal agencies authorized access for employment and licensing purposes pursuant to Public Laws 92-544 , 94-29 , and 95-405 . TYPE OF AID: Assistance available . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: All criminal justice agencies , Federal Government and other authorized governmental agencies and entities . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $63 ,954,000 . 16 . 305 LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE - UNIFORM CRIME REPORTS OBJECTIVES : To furnish information which will assist heads of law enforcement agencies in administration and operation of their departments . Further, to make data available to judges , penolo- gists , sociologists , legislators , students , and others interested in crime and its social aspects . TYPE OF AID: Assistance available . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: All participating law enforcement agencies including State and local governments are furnished a copy of the annual publication and semiannual releases . Limited copies are available to any interested individual by writing the Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice , Washington DC 20535 . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $2 ,648 ,000 . OFFICE OF JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION 16 . 541 JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION - SPECIAL EMPHASIS AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (PROGRAM GRANTS , DISCRETIONARY GRANTS AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE) -10- Cv OBJECTIVES : To develop and implement programs that support effective approaches , techniques and methods for preventing and controlling juvenile delinquency through development and utilization of com- munity-based alternatives to traditional forms of official justice system processing; improvement of the capability of public and private agencies to provide delinquency prevention services to youth and their families ; development of new approaches and tech- niques for reducing school drop-outs , unwarranted suspensions and expulsions ; and .through support of advocacy by groups and organi- zations committed to protection and improvement of the legal rights and welfare of youth. To provide technical assistance to Federal , State and local governments , courts , public and provate agencies , institutions , and individuals , in the planning, establishment , operation or evaluation of juvenile delinquency programs ; and to assist operating agencies having direct responsibilities for pre- vention and treatment of juvenile delinquency. TYPE OF AID: Grants and assistance . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Special Emphasis funds are available under the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of the Justice System Improvement Act of 1979 to public and private nonprofit agencies , organizations , individuals , State and local units of government , combinations of State or local units . Technical assistance is available to States , of general purpose local govern- ment , combinations of such States or units , or other private agencies , organizations , institutions or individuals . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Public and private youth serving agencies/ organizations , State and local units of government , combinations of such units , or other private agencies , organizations , institu- tions or individuals . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 81 est . $22 , 250,000 and FY 82 est . not available . (Technical assistance ) FY 81 est . $3 ,000 ,000 and FY 82 est . not available . 16 . 542 NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVEN- TION OBJECTIVES : To encourage , coordinate , and conduct research and evaluation of juvenile justice and delinquency prevention activi- ties ; to provide a clearninghouse and information center for collecting, publishing, and distributing information on juvenile delinquency ; to conduct a national training program; and to establish standards for the administration of juvenile justice . TYPE OF AID: Training and assistance . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Public or private agencies , organizations , or individuals . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 81 est . $11 ,000 ,000 ; and FY 82 est . not abailable . -11- fQ G BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS 16 . 551 STATISTICS ON CRIME AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE OBJECTIVES : To collect , evaluate , publish and disseminate sta- tistics and other information on crime , victimization, and the operation of the criminal justice system. TYPE OF AID: . Assistance available . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Publications are issued to the public , Criminal Justice Councils relevant criminal justice operating agencies , and others within and outside the criminal justice community. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 81 est . $6 ,629 ,000 and FY 82 est . not available . 16 . 552 CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES : To provide financial and technical assistance to States and local governments in the development and improvement of operational information and statistical systems . TYPE OF AID: Grants available . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local units of government ; combinations of State and local units ; and not-for-profit cor- porations . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Project grants ) FY 81 est $0 , and FY 82 est . not available . 16 . 553 PRIVACY AND SECURITY OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS OBJECTIVES : To provide assistance to criminal justice agencies in achieving compliance with Federal and State privacy and security requirements ; to ensure confidentiality of statistical data ; and to prevent information abuse through assistance in the specific area of computer crime . TYPE OF AID: Assistance available. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local units of governments ; combinations of State and local units ; and not-for-profit cor- porations . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: State , local and private organizations ; and not-for-proft corporations may receive funds . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Project Grants ) FY 81 est . $0 ; and FY 82 est . not available . -12- /6 NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE 16 . 560 JUSTICE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT GRANTS OBJECTIVES : To encourage and support research and development to further understanding of the causes of crime and to improve the criminal justice system. TYPE OF AID: Project grants (Cooperative Agreements or Contracts ) ; Dissemination of Technical Information. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: The National Institute of Justice is autho- rized to make grants to, or enter into contracts or cooperative agreements with State and local governments , private , profit , nonprofit organizations , institutions of higher education, and qualified individuals . Applicants from the Territories of the United States are also eligible to participate in this program. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $19 ,200 ,000. BUREAU OF PRISONS 16 . 601 CORRECTIONS - TRAINING AND STAFF DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES : To devise and conduct in various geographical loca- tions , seminars , workshops , and training programs for law enforce- ment officers , judges and judicial personnel , probation and parole personnel , correctional personnel , welfare workers and other per- sonnel , including lay ex-offenders and paraprofessionals , con- nected with the treatment and rehabilitation of criminal and juvenile offenders . To develop technical training teams to aid in the development of seminars , workshops , and training programs within the several States and with the State and local agencies which work with prisoners , parolees , probationers , and other offenders . TYPE OF AID: Training. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: States , general units of local govern- ment , as well as public and private agencies , educational insti- tutions , organizations , and individuals involved in the develop- ment , implementation or operation of correctional programs and services . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants and contracts ) FY 81 est . $3 ,580,000 , and FY 82 est not available. 16 .602 CORRECTIONS - RESEARCH AND EVALUATION OBJECTIVES : To conduct , encourage , and coordinate research relat- ing to corrections including the causes , prevention, diagnosis , and treatment of criminal offenders . To conduct evaluation pro- grams which study the effectiveness of new approaches , techniques , systems , programs , and devices employed to improve the corrections system. -13- 1° TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: States , general units of local government , public and private agencies , educational institutions , organiza- tions and individuals involved in the development , implementation or operation of correctional programs and services . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 81 est . $1 ,831 ,000 ; and FY 82 est . not available . Range and average of financial assistance : $1 , 500 to $200 ,000 ; $75 ,000. 16 . 603 CORRECTIONS - TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OBJECTIVES : To encourage and assist Federal , State , and local gov- ernment programs and services , and programs and services of other public and private agencies , institutions , and organizations in their efforts to develop and implement improved corrections pro- grams . To assist and serve in a consulting capacity to Federal , State , and local courts , departments , and agencies in the develop- ment , maintenance, and coordination of programs , facilities , services , training, treatment , and rehabilitation with respect to criminal and juvenile offenders . TYPE OF AID: Project grants and information services . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: States , general units of local government , public and private agencies , educational institutions , organiza- tions , and individuals involved in the development , implementation or operation of correctional programs and services . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants and contracts ) FY 81 est . $2 , 180 ,000 ; and FY 82 est . not available. Range and average of financial assistance : $1 ,500 to $50 ,000 ; $7 ,500 . 16 . 604 CORRECTIONS - POLICY FORMULATION OBJECTIVES : To formulate and disseminate correctional policy, goals , standards , and recommendations for Federal , State , and local correctional agencies , organizations , institutions , and personnel . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: States , general units of local government , public and private agencies , educational institutions , organiza- tions , and individuals involved in the development , implementation or operation of correctional programs and services . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants and contracts ) FY 81 est . $582 ,000; and FY 82 est . not available. Range and average of financial assistance : $1 , 500 to $75 ,000 ; $40 ,000. -14- 1 16 .605 CORRECTIONS - CLEARINGHOUSE OBJECTIVES : To serve as a clearinghouse and information center for the collection, preparation, and dissemination of information on corrections including, but not limited to, programs for the prevention of crime and recidivism, training of corrections personnel , and rehabilitation and treatment of criminal and juvenile offenders . TYPE OF AID: Grants and assistance . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: States , general units of local government , public and private agencies , educational institutions , organiza- tions , and individuals involved in the development , implementa- tion or operation of correctional programs and services . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants and contracts ) FY 81 est . $432 ,000; and FY 82 est . not available. Range and average of financial assistance : $1 , 500 to $25 ,000 ; $10 ,000 . LABOR-MANAGEMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 17 . 100 LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS SERVICES OBJECTIVES : To provide information and assistance to industry, organized labor, State and local governments , and other public and private groups in developing sound labor-management relations and to aid these groups in resolving labor-management problems . Protects the interests of employees affected by projects authorized under the Urban Mass Transportation Act , the Rail Passenger Service Act ; Federal - Aid Highway Act ; The Redwood Park Expansion Act ; the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 , and other statutes cited under Authorization section of the program. TYPE OF AID: Assistance available. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Assistance is available to all groups and individuals in the public and private sector. Eligibility for specific employee protection benefits is governed by the terms of each statute identified above. General information inquiries can be directed to the contact identified below who will direct the applicant to the appropriate agency for the filing of appli- cations . Under the Redwood and Airline protection programs , eligibility determinations are made at local State employment security offices . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est. $2 ,325 ,000. EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION 17 . 211 JOB CORPS OBJECTIVES : To assist economically disadvantaged young men and women who need and can benefit from an intensive educational and -15- //) Ci vocational training program in order to become more responsible , employable , and productive citizens . Program is operated pri- marily in a residential group setting. TYPE OF AID: Project grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Federal , state and local government agen- cies including U. S . Territories , private profit and nonprofit organizations , and Indian tribes and organizations having the capabilities to carry out the objectives of the program. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Job Corps participants must be ages 16 through 21 years old; be economically disadvantaged; be legal residents of the United States ; be in need of additional train- ing; be in need of a change of environment ; have expressed a firm interest in joining the Job Corps , and be free of serious health or behavioral problems that would jeopardize their own safety or that of others . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Interagency agreements , grants and con- tracts ) FY 82 est . $734,463 ,000 . Range and average of financial assistance : $1 ,500 ,000 to $18 ,000 ,000 ; $3 ,000,000. 17 . 232 COMPREHENSIVE EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING PROGRAMS (CETA) OBJECTIVES : To provide job training and employment opportunities for economically disadvantaged, unemployed, and underemployed persons and to assure that training and other services lead to increased earnings and enhanced self-sufficiency by establishing a flexible decentralized system of Federal , State , and local programs . TYPE OF AID: Formula grants ; project grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Title II , Parts B and C - States , units of general local government having a population of 100 ,000 or more , consortia of local government units at least one of which has a total population of 100,000 or more , units of local govern- ment considered eligible by the Secretary because of special circumstances , U.S . Territories , and a limited number of Con- centrated Employment Programs grantees in existence in December 1973 when CETA was enacted. Title II D - Applicants qualified under Title II , Parts B and C and Indian tribes on Federal or State reservations . Title IV - prime sponsors under Title II of the Act . Title VI - Applicants qualified under Title II , Parts B and C and Indian Tribes on Federal or State reservations . Title VII applicants qualified under Title II , Parts B and C. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Title II , Parts A, B and C - Economically disadvantaged persons . Title IV: YCCIP-Youth, 16-19 years of age , who are in-school or out-of-school and unemployed. YETP-Youth who are 14-21 years of age , in school unemployed, or underemployed. Title VI : Unemployed 10 of the 12 weeks immediately prior to application. Title VII: For PSIP programs , the eligibility re- quirements are the same as set forth for Title II-B and II-C of Act . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FY 82 est . Title II-D and VI $0, Title IV ( SYEP only) $805 ,648 ,000 , Title VII , $311 ,000 ,000. -16- 17 . 233 EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS OBJECTIVES : To support employment and training studies to develop policy and programs for achieving the fullest utilization of the Nation' s human resources ; to improve and strengthen the function- ing of the Nation' s Employment and Training System; To develop new approaches to facilitate employment of the difficult to employ; and to conduct R&D addressing the employment implica- tions of long-term social and economic trends and forces . TYPE OF AID: Project grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State colleges and universities , public , private , junior and community colleges , State and local government organizations including U. S . Territories , and other organizations and individuals capable of fulfilling the objects of the programs . There are no formal guidelines oz conditions performers must meet other than they have demonstrated financial responsibility and competence to fulfill the terms of the contract or grant . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: In the case of research projects bene- ficiary eligibility is same as applicant eligibility. With respect to experimental and demonstration projects , eligibility is deter- mined by the specific design of each project ; this is a function of the objectives of the project and the characteristics of the target group. Costs will be determined in accordance with FMC 73-8 for educational institutions . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $13 ,418 ,000. 17 . 235 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICE EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM (SCSEP) OBJECTIVES : To provide , foster, and promote useful part-time work opportunities (up to 25 hours per week) in community service activities for low income persons who are 55 years old and older, and who have poor employment prospects . TYPE OF AID: Formula grants ; project grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: The following types of organizations are eligible to receive project grants : ( 1 ) States , ( 2) National public and private nonprofit agencies and organizations other than political parties , ( 3) U. S . Territories . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Adults 55 years or older with an income at or below 125 of the OMB poverty level . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants and contracts ) FY 82 est. $277 , 100 ,000 . 17 . 243 SPECIAL NATIONAL PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES FOR THE DISADVANTAGED OBJECTIVES : To provide , foster , and promote training and other employment related services to groups with particular disadvan- tages in the labor market . To promote and foster new or improved linkages between the network of Federal , State , and local employ- ment and training agencies and components of the private sector. To carry out other special Federal responsibilities under CETA. TYPE OF AID: Project grants . -17- (v APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local governments , Federal agencies , private nonprofit and profit-making organizations , educational institutions , and Native American entities qualify- ing for assistance under Section 302 of CETA. NOTE: Applicant eligibility may be restricted to one or more applicant classes under particular announcements and solicitations . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Generally limited to the economically disadvantaged, normally with further targeting by sex, age group , race , and/or• other demographic criteria. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $47 ,000,000. Range and average of financial assistance : $70,000 to $16 ,000,000 , $500 ,000 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION 17 . 500 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH (OSHA) OBJECTIVES : To assure safe and healthful working conditions . TYPE OF AID: Assistance. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: (a) Any employer, employee or representa- tive concerned with OS&H problems ; (b) State agencies which have federally approved occupational safety and health programs ; (c ) labor unions , trade associations , educational institutions and other nonprofit organizations ; (d) any employee or employee representative of a business engaged in interstate commerce except those under the jurisdiction of other Federal agencies ; (e ) anyone concerned about the OS&H program. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility, with the exception of (c ) above , any employer, worker or their repre- sentative from a business engaged in interstate commerce except those under Jurisdiction of other Federal agencies . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $227 ,909 ,000. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION 20 . 215 HIGHWAY TRAINING AND EDUCATION OBJECTIVES : To develop and administer, in cooperation with State highway departments , training programs of instruction for Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA) and State and Local highway depart- ment employees engaged or to be engaged in Federal-aid highway work. TYPE OF AID: Assistance . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local highway agencies . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Employees of State and local highway agencies engaged in, or to be engaged in, Federal-aid highway work. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FY 82 est . $3 , 158 ,000. -18- cv r° 20. 216 HIGHWAY EDUCATIONAL GRANTS OBJECTIVES : To assist State and local agencies and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in developing the expertise needed for implementation of their highway programs . The programs are intended to address identified training needs of State and local agencies and FHWA identified national emphasis areas which currently include : highway safety, energy conservation, and civil rights . TYPE OF AID: • Grants and training. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Employees of Federal , State and local highway/transportation agencies engaged in or to be engaged in Federal-aid highway work. This includes employees of highway/ transportation agencies of Federally recognized Indian tribes and the U. S. territorial governments . Students who have a written commitment to work for a state or local highway/trans- portation agency or students who agree in writing to work for such agencies may be eligible for particular grant programs . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Primary beneficiary is the employer of the education grant recipient ; secondarily, the recipient . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FY 82 est . $500 ,000. Range and average of financial assistance : $2500 - $7500 ; average $300 . 20 . 217 MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY OBJECTIVES : To protect the public from risks inherent in commer- cial vehicle operations on the public highways , to minimize risks involved in moving hazardous materials over public highways , and to reduce noise pollution from commercial vehicle operation. TYPE OF AID: Training and assistance . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Anyone is eligible to file a complaint ; State and local police , rescue , and firefighting units may apply for safety and hazardous materials training. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as applicant eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FY 82 est . $14 ,651 ,000. FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION 20 . 301 RAILROAD SAFETY (RAILROAD SAFETY SERVICES ) OBJECTIVES : To reduce railroad-related casualties and accidents . TYPE OF AID: Assistance APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: General public and/or individuals concerned with railroad safety. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: General public . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FY 82 est . $30 ,550 ,000 . -19- Ci (6 20. 309 RAILROAD REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT - GUARANTEE OF OBLIGATIONS OBJECTIVES : To ( 1 ) provide financial assistance for the acquisi- tion or rehabilitation and improvement of railroad facilities or equipment ; and ( 2 ) develop new railroad facilities . TYPE OF AID: Guaranteed/insured loans . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Applicant is defined to mean any railroad or other person, including State and local government entities , which submits an application to the Administrator for the guarantee of an obligation under which it is an obligor. Under this defini- tion of applicant , a government entity may apply for and receive guarantees . However, the policy of FRA is not to guarantee tax exempt obligations unless the applicant can demonstrate compelling reasons why such a guarantee should be extended. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: The ultimate purpose is to provide the means to rehabilitate and maintain the physical facilities , im- prove the operations and structure , and restore the financial stability of the railway system of the United States , and to promote the revitalization of such railway system so that this mode of transportation will remain viable in the private sector of the economy and will be able to provide energy-efficient , ecologically compatible transportation services with greater efficiency, effectiveness and economy. Beneficiaries are the users of rail properties which have been acquiried or modernized with Federal assistance. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Loans ) FY 82 est . $320 ,000 ,000 . 20. 310 RAILROAD REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT - REDEEMABLE PREFERENCE SHARES OBJECTIVES : To provide railroads and noncarrier entities with financial assistance for the rehabilitation and improvement of equipment and facilities or such other purposes approved by Secretary. TYPE OF AID: Direct loans . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Any common carrier by railroad or express as defined in section 1 ( 3 ) of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 U. S .C. 10102 (4) or noncarrier entity may apply for assistance as described in section 505 (h) ( 3 ) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (45 U. S .C. 825 (h) ) . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: The ultimate purpose is to provide the means to rehabilitate and maintain the physical facilities , improve the operations and structure , and restore the financial stability of the railway system of the United States , and to pro- mote the revitalization of such railway system so that this mode of transportation will remain viable in the private sector of the economy and will be able to provide energy-efficient , ecologically compatible transportation services with greater efficiency, effectiveness and economy. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Direct payments ) FY 82 $110 ,000,000 . Range and average of financial assistance : Projects are expected to range from $5 ,000,000 to $100 ,000 ,000 ; $40 ,000.000 -20- (D URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION 20. 500 URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS (CAPITAL GRANTS ) OBJECTIVES : To assist in financing the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and improvement of facilities and equipment for use , by operation, lease , or otherwise , in mass transportation service in urban areas and in coordinating service with highway and other transportation in such areas . TYPE OF AID: Project grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Public agencies . Private transportation companies may participate through contractual arrangements with a public agency grantee . Applicant must have legal , financial ,and technical capacity to carry out proposed project . Capital funds are also available through the states to private , nonprofit organizations for the purpose of providing transportation services to the elderly and the handicapped. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $1 , 725,000 ,000 . Range and average of financial assistance : $1 ,216 to $800 ,000 ,000 ; $5 ,000,000 . 20. 503 URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION MANAGERIAL TRAINING GRANTS OBJECTIVES : To provide fellowships for training of managerial , technical , and professional personnel employed in the urban mass transportation field. TYPE OF AID: Training. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Public bodies may apply for their employees or those of urban transit companies operating in their areas . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Employees of public bodies or employees of private urban transit companies operating in their areas . The Fellow selected must meet the requirements of the institution he wishes to attend. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $1 ,250,000 . 20 . 504 MASS TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY (R & D PROGRAM) OBJECTIVES : 1 ) In conventional bus and rail transit design, equip- ment manufacture , or construction, to obtain either substantial reductions in life-cycle costs without sacrificing performance, safety or service capability, or substantial improvements in per- formance , safety or service capability in a cost-effecitve manner; 2 ) to support selected high-risk, high technology projects promis- ing significant potential increases in productivity through the introduction of automation into transit operations (where these initiatives are beyond the financial or other capabilities of the private sector) ; and 3 ) to support national priorities , such as central city revitalization, accessibility for the elderly and handicapped, energy conservation , and environmental protection. -21- TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: ( 1 ) Grants and Cooperative Agreements : Public bodies or nonprofit institutions only. ( 2 ) Contracts : Determined by evaluation of bids responsive to Requests for Proposals (RFPs ) . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FY 82 est . (Grants and Contracts ) $44,000 ,000. 20. 505 URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL STUDIES GRANTS (TECH STUDIES ) OBJECTIVES : To assist in planning, engineering, and designing of urban mass transportation projects , and other technical studies in a program for a unified or officially coordinated urban trans- portation system. TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and other local public bodies and agencies . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $60 ,000,000. Range and average of financial assistance : $10 ,000 to $4, 500 ,000 ; $200 ,000. 20. 506 URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION DEMONSTRATION GRANTS (SERVICE AND METHODS DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM) OBJECTIVES : To demonstrate- new, innovative techniques and methods in an operational environment that will reduce urban transportation problems and improve mass transportation service . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Grants to conduct operational tests must be to a legally constituted public agency. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants contracts ) FY 82 est . $11 ,000,000 . 20 . 507 URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL AND OPERATING ASSISTANCE FORMULA GRANTS (FORMULA GRANT PROGRAM) OBJECTIVES : To assist in financing the acquisition, construction, and improvement of facilities and equipment for use by operation or lease or otherwise in mass transportation service , and the pay- ment of operating expenses to improve or to continue such service by operation, lease , contract or otherwise . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Funds will be made available to urbanized areas (as* defined by the Bureau of the Census ) through designated recipients which must be public entities and legally capable of receiving and dispensing Federal funds . The governor, responsible -22- lv G local officials , and publicly-owned operators of mass transporta- tion services must jointly designate the recipient( s ) for urbanized areas of 200,000 or more population. The Governor or his designee is the recipient for urbanized areas of 50,000 to 200,000 popula- tion. Recipients must submit a program of projects to UMTA and the Governor through the Metropolitan Planning Organization as part of the annual elements of the areawide Transportation Improve- ment Plan; submit project applications to UMTA; enter into formal project agreements with UMTA; and certify that a public hearing has been conducted. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Publicly and privately owned operators of mass transportation services . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $1 , 530,000 ,000 . 20. 510 URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING METHODS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SYSTEM - UTPS ) OBJECTIVES : To develop and demonstrate improved transportation planning methods , both computerized and mannual . TYPE OF AID: Grants , training and assistance. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local governments and nonprofit organizations for grants . No limitation for technical information, or training. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FY 81 est . $4 ,450 ,000 ; and FY 82 est . not available . BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS 21 .052 ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, AND FIREARMS - TRAINING ASSISTANCE OBJECTIVES : To help the participant identify the laws relating to alcohol , tobacco, firearms and explosives , and provide train- ing in specific investigative skills and techniques , and to help State , county , and local law enforcement officers improve their law enforcement capabilities in the organized crime area, includ- ing arson cigarette smuggling, and firearms investigations . TYPE OF AID: Assistance and training. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State , county, local law enforcement agencies and public safety officials . Participation is limited to non-uni- formed police personnel engaged in arson, cigarette smuggling, and firearms investigations or in the process of being assigned or pro- moted to such non-uniformed assignments . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Travel and materials ) FY 82 est . $28 ,000 . • -23- b UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE 21 . 100 SECRET SERVICE - TRAINING ACTIVITIES OBJECTIVES : To acquaint money handlers and law enforcement offi- cials with the functions of the Secret Service , to train them in the techniques used in detecting counterfeit documents and money, and to acquaint local officials with the techniques of protecting dignitaries ; to .assist criminal investigators by training them in the basic examination of questioned documents . TYPE OF AID: Training. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: For training in Questioned Document Course and Protective Operations Briefing applicant must be member of a sworn police agency. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est. $21 ,000. OFFICE OF REVENUE SHARING *21 . 300 STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT FISCAL ASSISTANCE - GENERAL REVENUE SHARING (REVENUE SHARING) OBJECTIVES : To provide financial assistance to State governments and general purpose local governments . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: General purpose local governments , including the District of Columbia, the governing bodies of Indian tribes or Alaskan native villages performing substantial governmental func- tions , and the offices of the separate law enforcement officers for county areas (Parishes ) in the State of Louisiana. In fiscal years 1982 and 1983 , there is an authorization of appropriations for State governments subject to an appropriation by Congress and a requirement for States to refuse or refund an amount of cate- gorical aid equal to their revenue sharing allocation. General purpose local governments are determined by the Census Bureau on the basis of the same principles used for general statistical pur- poses . Indian tribes and Alaskan native villages performing sub- stantial governmental functions are determined either by the Bureau of Indian Affairs or by a State Governor. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Any person, group, or agency may seek revenue sharing funds from a recipient State or local government and must be allowed to participate in two required public hearings on the use of these funds . The final decision about how the recipient government is to use its revenue sharing funds is made by its governing body. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $4,569 ,949 ,000 . OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 27 .008 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION IN RECRUITING AND EXAMINING -24- OBJECTIVES : To assist State and local governments to strengthen their staffs through: (a) participation with the Office of Per- sonnel Management (OPM) in share-costs recruiting and staffing activities and (b) use of Federal registers for recruiting pur- poses on a reimbursable basis . TYPE OF AID: Assistance . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: States , or their political subdivisions , agencies , or instrumentalities and Indian tribal governments . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Job applicants . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: Obligations : not applicable , reimbursable program. 27 .009 TRAINING ASSISTANCE TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS . OBJECTIVES : To assist State and local governments and Indian tribal governments in training professional , administrative , and technical personnel to increase their capability for mission accomplishment . TYPE OF AID: Training. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: States , their political subdivisions , agencies , or instrumentalities ; Indian governmental bodies . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: State and local employees and employees of Indian governing bodies . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Revolving fund) FY 82 est. $1 ,000 ,000. 27 .010 STATE AND LOCAL MERIT PERSONNEL SYSTEMS AND OTHER TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OBJECTIVES : To assist State and local governments and Indian tribal governments to strengthen their personnel management cap- abilities , make better use of their personnel resources , and aid in the application of merit system standards to State and local personnel systems . TYPE OF AID: Assistance . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: States , their political subdivisions , agencies , or instrumentalities , and Indian tribal governments . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 81 est . $1 , 700,000; and FY 82 est . $0. 27 .011 INTERGOVERNMENTAL MOBILITY OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL EMPLOYEES OBJECTIVES : To facilitate Federal-State-local cooperation and to aid in solving problems and delivering improved services at all. government levels through the sharing of professional , adminis- trative, and technical expertise . -25- TYPE OF AID: Assistance. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: A proposal for assignment may be initiated either by the State or local government , institution of higher education, Indian tribe or other eligible organization which must then obtain the agreement of the Federal agency; alternatively the request may be originated by the Federal agency which must then obtain the agreement of the State or local jurisdiction, or Indian tribe , institution of higher education, or other eligible organization. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Approximate Federal share of salary costs ) FY 82 est . $29 ,000 ,000. 27 .012 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL GRANTS OBJECTIVES : To assist State and local governments and Indian tribal governments in strengthening their productivity and central management capabilities through programs to improve personnel systems ; and to train professional , administrative, and technical employees and officials . TYPE OF AID: Training and assistance . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Any State or any group of States that enters into a compact or other agreement consistent with law, and any general local government or group of general local governments serving a population of 50 ,000 or more, are eligible. Indian governing bodies that perform substantial governmental functions are also eligible; regardless of population size . A general local government or group thereof that serves a population of less than 50 ,000 , may receive a grant from OPM provided it is involved in programs of national interest and is experiencing personnel administration problems or training needs related to such national programs interest or a subgrant from a State govern- ment or other IPA grantee. for the purposes of the Act , "State" includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands , and U. S. ter- ritories and possessions . Organizations representing State and local governments , associations of State or local public officials , and nonprofit organizations which provide requested services to governments may receive a grant for training State and local government employees . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 81 $14,400 ,000 ; and FY 82 est . $0. 27 .013 PRESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT INTERN PROGRAM OBJECTIVES : To bring graduate students receiving advanced degrees in management with a public sector focus into the Federal service , to allow State and local governments to hire these individuals , and to provide temporary State and local government work assign- ments for program participants . -26- TYPE OF AID: Assistance. l � v APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local governments and organiza- tions eligible to participate in the IPA mobility program are eligible to host Federal interns . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses for OPM Adminis- tration) FY 82 est . $275 ,000. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 30.002 EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION - STATE AND LOCAL ANTI-DISCRIMINATION AGENCY CONTRACTS OBJECTIVES : To assist EEOC in the enforcement of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, by attempting settlement and investigating and resolving charges of employment discrimina- tion based on race , color, religion, sex, national origin, or age. TYPE OF AID: Assistance . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Official State and local government agencies charged with the administration and enforcement of fair employment practices laws . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Employees , potential employees and former employees covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Contracts ) FY 82 est . $19 ,000 ,000 . Range and average of financial assistance : $35 ,400 to $1 ,977 ,200 ; $205 , 747 . 30.006 EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION - COMPLIANCE PROGRAM FOR NON-FEDERAL PUBLIC EMPLOYERS OBJECTIVES : To promote equal employment opportunity in State , county and municipal governments and public educational institutions in order to bring them into voluntary compliance with Title VII . TYPE OF AID: Assistance and training. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Any State or local government or public educational institution subject to Title VII . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $191 ,000. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 39 .002 DISPOSAL OF DEDERAL SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY OBJECTIVES : To dispose of furplus real property. TYPE OF AID: Sale , Exchange , or Donation of Property and Goods . -27- APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: States and local government agencies are eligible to apply for surplus real property for park, recreation, historic monument , public airport , health, educational , replacement housing, and general public purposes . Eligibility for property for wildlife conservation use is limited to the states . Tax-sup- ported and nonprofit medical and educational institutions which have been held exempt from taxation under 501 (c ) ( 3 ) of the Internal Revenue Code are also eligible to apply for property for health and educational use . Public bodies or private individuals are eligible to apply for property for use in the provision of housing for families or individuals of low or moderate income , and for related public , commercial , and industrial facilities . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: The general public . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $4, 570 ,000 . 39 .007 SALE OF FEDERAL SURPLUS PERSONAL PROPERTY ( SALES PROGRAM) OBJECTIVES : To sell property no longer needed by the Government in an economical and efficient manner and obtain the maximum net return from sales . General Services Administration conducts the sale of personal property for most of the civil agencies ; the Department of Defense handles the sale of its own surplus property. TYPE OF AID: Sale , exchange , or donation of property and goods . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Competitive bid sales are open to the general public . The sale of surplus property by negotiation is authorized where the disposal will be to states , territories , possessions , political subdivisions thereof , or tax-supported agencies therein, subject to obtaining the estimated fair market value of the property and other satisfactory terms of disposal . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $4,000 ,000 . LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 42 .006 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS RESEARCH SERVICES OBJECTIVES : To provide ( 1 ) general and specialized reference and bibliographic services ; and ( 2 ) referral services , based on an indexed inventory of some 13 ,000 information resources . Referral services are available in all subjects through the library' s national referral center staff, who direct those with special questions concerning a particular subject to organizations or individuals who can provide the answer. In responding to each inquiry, the center draws on its current registry of 13 ,000 information resources and furnishes a name , address , telephone number, and description of services for each information resource provided. This information is also disseminated within broad tropical areas , through occasional published volumes in the series "A' Directory of Information Resources in the United States . " -28- TYPE OF AID: Assistance . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Admission to the Library is free and admission to its reading rooms is permitted to all person over high school age. Those who cannot come to the Library of Con- gress and who have exhausted available resources will be assisted by telephone and letter to the extent that time permits . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $22 , 267 ,000. NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS 45 .001 PROMOTION OF THE ARTS - DESIGN ARTS OBJECTIVES : To promote excellence in design by funding activities in architecture , landscape architecture , urban design and planning, interior design, graphic design and fashion design. The Program awards grants to community and neighborhood organizations , art institutions colleges and universities , local and state govern- ments , professional designers , design students and other qualified individuals working on design projects . (No funds for capital improvements . ) TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Grants may be made to: 1 ) nonprofit organi- zations , including State and local governments and State arts agencies , if donations to such organizations qualify as charitable deductions under Section 170 ( c ) of the Internal Revenue Code; and to 2 ) individuals (oridinarily U. S . citizens only) who, according to Public Law 89-209 , Section 5 ( c ) must possess exceptional talent . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $3 ,118 ,000. Range and average of financial assistance : Organizations : Up to $20 ,000 ; $15 ,000 average . 45 .010 PROMOTION OF THE ARTS - EXPANSION ARTS OBJECTIVES : To provide grants to professionally directed, com- munity-based arts organizations involved with urban, suburban, and rural communities . Particular attention is given to these organizations which serve citizens - including ethnic minorities - whose cultural needs are not met by the major arts institutions . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Grants may be made only to nonprofit organizations if donations to such organizations qualify as a chartiable deducation under Section 170(c ) of the Internal Revenue Code . This definition includes states , local govern- ments , and State arts agencies . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. -29- ' L/ FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $5 ,049 ,000. Rangeand average of financial assistance : Organizations : $1 ,000 to $70,000 ; $12 ,500 average . 45 .011 PROMOTION OF THE ARTS - INTER-ARTS OBJECTIVES : To provide grants for a limited number of special pro- jects which do not fit other Endowment program guidelines , or pro- jects which involve two or more art forms or program areas and have potential national or regional impact . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Grants may be made only to nonprofit organi- zations if donations to such organizations qualify as a charitable deduction under Section 170(c ) of the Internal Revenue Code . This definition also includes states , local governments , and State art agencies . there are no grants to individuals . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $2 , 775,000. Range an average of financial assistance : Organizations : $1 ,080 to $100,000; $27 ,823 . 45.012 PROMOTION OF THE ARTS - MUSEUMS OBJECTIVES : To provide grants in support of American museums ' s essential activities . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Grants may be made to : 1 ) nonprofit organi- zations , including State and local governments and State arts agencies , if donations to such organizations qualify as chart- able deductions under Section 170( c ) of the Internal Revenue Code; and to 2 ) individuals (ordinarily U. S . citizens only) who, accord- ing to Public Law 89-209 , Section 5 ( c ) must possess exceptional talent . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $7 , 772 ,000 . Range and financial assistance : Individuals : $1 , 100 to $17 ,895 . Organizations : $370 to $500 ,000 ; $20 ,000 average. 45 .013 PROMOTION OF THE ARTS - CHALLENGE GRANTS OBJECTIVES : To enable cultural organizations and institutions to increase the levels of continuing support and to increase the range of contributors to the programs of such organizations or institu- tions ; to provide administrative and management improvements for cultural organizations and institutions , particularly in the field of long-range financial planning; to enable cultural organizations and institutions to increase audience participation, and apprecia- tion of programs sponsored by such organizations and institutions ; to stimulate greater cooperation among cultural organizations and institutions expecially designed to better serve the communities in which such organizations or institutions are located; and to foster greater citizen involvement in planning the cultural develop- ment of a community. -30- TYPE OF AID: Grants . ° v APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Grants may be made only to nonprofit organi- zations if donations to such organizations qualify as a charitable deduction under Section 170( c ) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. This definition includes local governments and State arts agencies . Individuals are not eligible . Applicants must have recognized aesthetic quality and impact in the community, State, region or nation. Applicatns should be eligible for support under regular Endowment programs (45 .001 - 45 .015 ) . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $2 , 500,000. Range and average of financial assistance : $30,000 to $1 ,500,000; $208 ,000 average . NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES 45. 104 PROMOTION OF THE HUMANITIES - MEDIA HUMANITIES PROJECTS OBJECTIVES : To encourage and support radio and television produc- tion that : 1 ) advances public understanding and use of the human- ities , including such fields as history, jurisprudence , literature , anthropology, philosophy, archeology; 2 ) is of the highest profes- sional caliber both in terms of scholarship in the humanities and in terms of technical production; and 3 ) is suitable for national or regional television broadcast and distribution, or for national , regional or local radio broadcast . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local governments and nonprofit agencies , institutions , organizations or groups are eligible ; each proposal must involve direct collaboration between experienced humanities scholars and producers , screenwriters , directors and actors of top professional stature. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $3 ,800,000. Range and average of financial assistance : $4 ,000 to $1 ,000,000 ; $114,000 . 45 . 115 PROMOTION OF THE HUMANITIES - YOUTHGRANTS OBJECTIVES : To support humanities projects initiated and con- ducted by young persons . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Entities of State and local governments , and individuals who are U. S . citizens , native residents of U. S . territorial possessions , or foreign nationals who have been residents in the U. S . for at least three years immediately pre- ceding the date of the application; and nonprofit U. S . organiza- tions and academic institutions are eligible. Foreign institu- tions or organizations are not eligible and foreign nationals in the U. S . are also ineligible unless affiliated with a U.S . insti- tution or organization. -31 - BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility, except that Youthgrants are normally awarded for projects developed by young persons in their teens and early twenties (Youthgrants have not been awarded to anyone over the age of 30) . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $250 ,000 . Range and average of financial assistance : Up to $10 ,000 for group projects ; up to $15 ,000 for film or video projects . 45 . 125 PROMOTION OF THE HUMANITIES - HUMANITIES PROJECTS IN MUSEUMS AND HISTORICAL ORGANIZATIONS OBJECTIVES : To assist museums , historical organizations and other similar cultural institutions to implement effective and imaginative programs which use material culture to convey and interpret humanities themes to the general public . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local governments and nonprofit museums , historical organization, historic sites and other insti- tutions capable of implementing public programs in the humanities . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $3 ,600,000. Range and average of financial assistance : Self-study $1 ,000-$10 ,000 ; planning for temporary and permanent exhibitions $5 ,000-$15 ,000 ; permanent interpretive projects $10,000-$50,000 ; temporary interpretive pro- jects $12 ,000-$35 ,000; sharing collection resources $10,000-$50 ,000; historic site interpretation $5 ,000-$12 ,000 ; courses of study $15 ,000-$50 ,000. 45 . 127 PROMOTION OF THE HUMANITIES - ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION PROGRAM OBJECTIVES : To promote the development and testing of imagina- tive approaches to precollegiate education in the humanities by supporting demonstration projects that can be completed within a specified period of time . Most projects are planned and imple- mented by groups of school and/or university faculty, last one to three years , and are concerned with the design of model courses or programs , teacher training institutes , or the development of curricular materials including an emphasis on teacher training. Projects often involve increased collaboration between schools , higher education institutions , and cultural institutions . The program particularly seeks projects that show promise of serving as models for other institutions . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Schools , school systems , higher education institutions , and other nonprofit educational cultural and pro- fessional organizations ; State and local governments . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $3 ,050,000 . Range and average of financial assistance : $1 ,000 to $500 ,000; average $70 ,000. Few are above $100 ,000. -32- /3C/ 45. 130 PROMOTION OF THE HUMANITIES - CHALLENGE GRANTS PROGRAM OBJECTIVES : To provide financial assistance to institutions that store , research, or disseminate the humanities ; to broaden the base of financial support by "challenging" institutions to raise three private dollars for every Federal grant dollar; to help secure financial stability in order to maintain existing services and resources . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Any nonprofit humanities institution, association or organization is eligible to apply; institutions whose scope encompasses activities outside the humanities ( e .g. , arts , science , medicine ) may apply for a challenge grant to cover the costs of only the humanities component , or that percent- age of total institutional cost which can be directly identified with these . Local , county and state governments are eligible to apply on their own behalf or on behalf of nonprofit institu- tions , associations or organizations within their jurisdictions ; individuals and public and private elementary and secondary schools are not eligible to apply. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY : Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Direct payment ) FY 82 est. $9 ,600 ,000. Range and average of financial assistance : $2 ,000 to $1 , 500 ,000 over three years ; $200 ,000 total or $66 ,000 a year; 22% of the total number of awards averaged less than $16 ,000 a year. 45 . 131 PROMOTION OF THE HUMANITIES - SPECIAL PROJECTS OBJECTIVES : As the experimental unit of NEH: to examine applica- tions that do not fall directly into existing program structures or that fall between two or more existing programs ; to consider new areas that are not covered by other NEH programs and to devel- op projects in these areas ; and to stimulate NEH thinking on new program areas through special conferences and projects . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Entities of State and local government , U. S . citizens and residents , U. S . nonprofit organizations , and academic institutions are eligible . Foreign institutions are not eligible and foreign nationals are also ineligible unless affiliated with a U. S . institution or organization, or a resident within the U. S . for three consecutive years prior to the time of application. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 $0 . this program is targeted for elimination after FY 81 . Range and average of financial assistance : $5 ,000 to $500 ,000; $50 ,000. 45 . 135 PROMOTION OF THE HUMANITIES - YOUTH PROJECTS OBJECTIVES : To support humanities projects which provide educa- tional opportunities beyond those of in-school programs for large -33- groups of young people under the direction of experienced profes- sionals in the humanities and professionals in youth work. These may be sponsored by educational , cultural , scholarly, civic , media or youth organizations . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Entities of State and local governments , and nonprofit U.S . organizations and academic institutions are eligible . Foreign institutions or organizations are not eligible . U. S . citizens and foreign nationals in the U.S . are ineligible unless affiliated with a U. S. institution or organization. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility, except that NEH Youth Projects are awarded for projects developed and directed by professionals in the humanities and in youth work and aimed at involving large numbers of children and teenagers . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $750 ,000 . Planning grants are $2 ,500 and pilot grants are $2 ,500, or $5 ,000. 45 . 141 PROMOTION OF THE HUMANITIES - STATE, LOCAL AND REGIONAL STUDIES OBJECTIVES : To encourage the production of original research and writing relating to the history and customs of the states , regions and communities in the United States drawing upon various disci- plines in the humanities such as economics , history, politics , languages and literature , folklore , archaeology, and architectural and art history; to encourage cooperation among scholars and citizens in developing and using the resources of the humanities . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: U.S . citizens and residents , U. S . nonpro- fit organizations , and academic institutions including state colleges and universities , public , private , junior and community colleges , are eligible. Foreign institutions or organizations are not eligible and foreign nationals are also ineligible unless affiliated with a U. S. institution or organization or a resident within the U. S . for three consecutive years prior to the time of application. State and local governments are eligible. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $650 ,000 . Range and average of financial assistance : $5 ,000 but rarely exceed $100 ,000; $39 ,000 . COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 49 .005 COMMUNITY FOOD AND NUTRITION OBJECTIVES : To help communities counteract the conditions of hunger and malnutrition among the poor. TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Community Action Agencies , State and local governments (under certain circumstances ) , public and private non-profit agencies which meet GSA' s general eligibility criteria, Indian tribal councils , migrant and seasonal farmworker organizations . -34- BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Families and individuals of all ages with low income , as defined by CAS poverty guidelines , in urban and rural areas . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants and contracts ) FY 81 est . $26 ,000 ,000 ; and FY 82 est . $0. Range and average of financial assistance : $5 ,000 to $300 ,000 . Average $42 ,000 . 49 .010 OLDER PERSONS OPPORTUNITIES AND SERVICES (SENIOR OPPORTUNITIES AND SERVICES (SOS ) OBJECTIVES : This program is designed to identify and meet the needs of poor persons above the age of 60 in projects which serve or employ older persons as the predominant or exclusive benefici- ary or employee group. TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local governments and other public and private nonprofit agencies are eligible for CAA financial assistance . Grants are made both to Community Action Agencies (CAAs ) and single purpose agencies . CAAs may delegate individual projects by contract to other agencies . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: The Special Emphasis Program for the Elderly, funded under Section 222 as a national program, focuses on the special needs of low-income families and individuals above the age of 60; and the creation of maximum opportunity for employ- ment and volunteer services for persons 55 years or older. Bene- ficiaries should apply at the Local Community Action Agency listed in the local telephone book or contact local public officials for location of programs in the- area that are assisting the older person. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 81 est . $10 , 500,000; and FY 82 est . $0. Range and average of financial assistance : $500 to $2 ,362 ,000 ; $35 ,000. 49 .018 HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (RURAL HOUSING) OBJECTIVES : Working through and with its extensive network of Housing Development Corporations and Community Action Agencies , CSA' s national and regional housing programs shall actively and aggressively seek new ways to correct the inequitable distribu- tion of housing in the United States so that even the poorest in our society may have a decent home and a suitable living environment . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: CSA funds may be distributed to State , local , and territorial governments , CAAs , HDCs and other public or private nonprofit agencies ( that meet CSA eligibility criteria) which serve the needs of individuals and families in rural areas whose income falls within the CSA poverty guidelines . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Programs are intended to benefit those in rural areas that have an income that falls within the CSA poverty guidelines . -35- FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 81 est . $3 ,500,000 and FY 82 est . $0. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 59 . 007 MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS- MEN (CALL CONTRACTS PROGRAM) OBJECTIVES : To provide management and technical assistance through public or private organizations to existing or potential businesses who are economically or socially disadvantaged or who are located in areas of high concentration of unemployment ; or are partici- pants in activities authorized by sections 7 ( i ) and 8(a) of the Small Business Act . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Public or private organizations that have the capability to provide the necessary assistance. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Businesses or potential businesses who are economically or socially disadvantaged, or participants in the 8 (a ) program. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Contract ) FY 82 est . $10,000,000. Range and average of financial assistance : Call contracts : $15 ,000 to $306 ,250 ; $94, 118. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY - OFFICE OF AIR, NOISE, AND RADIATION 66 .001 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM GRANTS OBJECTIVES : To assist State , municipal , intermunicipal , and inter- state agencies in planning, developing, establishing, improving, and maintaining adequate programs for prevention and control of air pollution or implementation of national primary and secondary air quality standards . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Any municipal , intermunicipal , State , or interstate agency with legal responsibility for appropriate air pollution planning and control is eligible for grant support provided such organization furnishes funds for the current year in excess of its expenditures for the previous year for its air pollution program. This program is available to each State , territory and possession of the U. S . , including the District of Columbia. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $82 ,600 ,000. Range and average of financial assistance : $7 ,025 to $6 ,449 ,000 ; $700,000. 66 .006 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL - TECHNICAL TRAINING OBJECTIVES : To provide technical training to personnel from State and local air pollution control agencies , to insure continued -36- technical competence of State and local agency personnel , and to provide technical training of selected personnel from the Federal Government and industry. TYPE OF AID: Training. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: This program is available to those who are ( 1 ) employed by State or local air pollution control agencies in each State , territory and possession of the U. S . , including the District of Columbia , or ( 2 ) otherwise qualified occupationally, and meet the requirements of the particular course. Contact Registrar for details on specific courses . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $1 ,010 ,000 . 66 .007 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL - NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR AND SOURCE EMISSION DATA ( SAROAD/NEDS) OBJECTIVES : To establish and operate a single , standardized system for acquisition, validation and editing, analysis , and retrieval of source data for emissions and air quality data for assessing the extent of air pollution for use by Federal , State , and local agencies as well as other organizations . TYPE OF AID: Information services . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Data provided to Federal , State , and local government agencies , profit and nonprofit organizations , and indi- viduals in each State , territory and possession of the U. S . , in- cluding the District of Columbia . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $2 ,000 ,000. 66 .008 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL -TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OBJECTIVES : To assist State and local Air Pollution Control Agencies in carrying out their responsibilities under the Clean Air Act . TYPE OF AID: Advisory services . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: This program is available to each State , territory and possession of the U. S . , including the District of Columbia . Applicant for assistance must be a State or local Air Pollution Control Agency or a Federal Agency. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Beneficiaries may be any public autho- rities , agencies , and institutions , private agencies , institu- tions , and individuals . FINANCIAL INFORMATION : ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $8 , 500 ,000 . 66 . 009 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL - TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES OBJECTIVES : To provide information on the published literature on air pollution and to provide copies of EPA (and to a limited degree , other) publications as long as supplies last . -37- TYPE OF AID: Information Services . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Literature searches are made for: State and local governmental air pollution control agencies ; U. S . territories and possessions ; nonprofit citizens environmental groups ; foreign governments ; and EPA grantees and contractors . Publications are provided, while supplies last , to all parties upon request . Parties may be referred to USGOP of NTIS if a publication is not available. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $60 ,000. 66 .030 NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL - TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OBJECTIVES : To provide technicial assistance to State and local governments to facilitate their development and enforcement of ambient noise standards . TYPE OF AID: Advisory services and information services . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: This program is available to any State or community in each State , territory and possession of the U. S . , including the District of Columbia, for the following: State and local environmental protection or pollution control agencies ; other appropriate State , regional and local authorities ; committees , members , or staffs of State legislatures ; other interstate and regional groups . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 81 est . $3 , 344,000 ; and FY 82 est $0 . (This program is targeted for elimination in the near future . ) 66 .031 QUIET COMMUNITIES - STATE AND LOCAL CAPACITY BUILDING ASSISTANCE OBJECTIVES : To promote the development of effective State and local noise control programs , by identifying noise problems and establishing or augmenting a noise control capability in such jurisdictions . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: The program is available to States and communities in each State , territory and possession of the U.S . , the District of Columbia, authorized regional planning agencies , State and local environmental protection or pollution control agencies and other appropriate State , regional and local authorities . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FY 81 est . $2 ,010 ,000; and FY 82 est . $0. (This program is targeted for elimination in the near future. ) -38- OFFICE OF WATER AND WASTE MANAGEMENT 66 .423 WATER QUALITY CONTROL INFORMATION SYSTEM - ORIENTATION/TRAINING SEMINARS , DATA AND MONITORING PUBLICATIONS ( STORET - STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM) OBJECTIVES : To provide to local , State , interstate, and other water pollution control and water resource management agencies orientation, and where requested, training in the use of the storage and retrieval ( STORET) system used by OWWM for handling water quality and management data ; to provide user documentation on the capabilities and use of the system. TYPE OF AID: Training. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Training services are furnished as resources allow to government or government connected (Federal , State , county and city) agencies where access to water quality and related data is required to pursue the official functions of the organization concerned. This program is available to each State , territory and possession of the U. S . , including the district of Columbia. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) Not separately identifiable . 66 .425 DRINKING WATER SUPPLY - .TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OBJECTIVES : To assure that water supply systems serving the public meet minimum national standards for the protection of public health. TYPE OF AID: Advisory and information services . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local water supply regulatory agencies and public water supply operators or officials in each State , territory and possession of the U. S . , including the District of Columbia . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: The general public served by a water supply. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: No estimates given. 66 .435 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL - LAKE RESTORATION COOPERATIVE AGREE- MENTS (CLEAN LAKES COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS ) -39- OBJECTIVES : To make technical and financial assistance available to states to diagnose the cases of degradation in publicly-owned fresh water lakes , and develop feasible lake restoration plans to restore and preserve the lake . TYPE OF AID: Grants through State agencies . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: By statute , State agencies only. However, through written interagency agreements , funds may be passed through to city and county governments or other locally and municipally constituted authorities . This program is available to each State, territory and possession of U.S . , including the District of Columbia. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: The respective public interests served by the applicant authority. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 81 $11 ,000,000 under Section 314. No funds were recommended for the Clean Lakes Program in the President ' s FY 82 budget. This program is targeted for pos- sible elimination after FY 81 . 66 .450 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND INFORMATION SERVICES (RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY PANELS ) OBJECTIVES : To assist states in the development of State control programs , and State and local governments in the development of acceptable disposal alternatives and improved waste managment systems and practices ; and to rapidly disseminate information on all aspects of solid waste management to the public . TYPE OF AID: Advisory and information services . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Technical assistance : Federal agencies , State and local governments . Information services : The public , including any Federal , State or local government ; agency or authority; any profit or nonprofit organizations and institutions ; individuals ; any interest group or any other person as defined in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act . State includes the 50 states , the District of Columbia , the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands , Guam, American Samoa , and the Northern Mariana Islands . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Including contracts , grants , salaries , and expenses ) FY 81 $5 ,069 ,400 ; for technical assistance. FY 81 $1 , 113 , 100 for information services . No funds were requested for FY 81 for technical assistance or information services . This program is targeted for possible elimination after FY 82 . 66 .451 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM SUPPORT GRANTS OBJECTIVES : To assist State , interstate , regional , county , municipal , and intermunicipal agencies , authorities and organi- zations in the development and implementation of State and local -40- programs and to support rural and special communities in pro- grams and projects leading to the solution of solid waste management problems and the control of solid waste management systems . TYPE OF AID: , Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and substate solid waste agencies , authorities and organizations . State includes the 50 states , the District of Columbia , the commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands , Guam, American Samoa , and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $41 , 700 ,000. Sec 4008(a) No funds were requested for FY 82 . Section 4008 (a) No funds were requested for FY 82 . Section 3001 : FY 82 est . $41 , 700 ,000. Section 400 ( 8 ) ( e ) and Section 4009 ; FY 80-82 $0. OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 66 . 504 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RESEARCH GRANTS . OBJECTIVES : To support and promote the coordination of research and development in the area- of collection, storage , utilization, salvage or final disposal of solid waste . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: This program is available to each State , territory and possession of the U. S . , including the District of Columbia, for public or private agencies , public , private , State universities and colleges , State and local governments , and individuals . Profit-making organizations are not eligible . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants and Cooperative Agreements ) FY 82 est . $7 , 155 , 500 . Range and average of financial assistance : FY 82 (projected) average $157 ,000. -41- 66 . 505 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL - RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMON- STRATION GRANTS OBJECTIVES : To support and promote the coordination and accelera- tion of research, development , and demonstration projects relating to the causes , effects , extent , prevention, reduction and elimina- tion of water pollution. TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY : This program is available to each State , territory and possession of the U. S . , including the District of Columbia , for public , private , State , and community universities and colleges , hospitals , laboratories , State water pollution control agencies , interstate agencies , State and local govern- ments , other public or private nonprofit agencies , institutions ; organizations ; grants may also be awarded to individuals who have demonstrated unusually high scientific ability. Grants under certain sections of this law may be awarded to profit-making organizations . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants and Cooperative Agreements ) FY 82 est . (Research) $11 , 748 ,300; FY 82 est . (Demonstration) $3 , 700 ,000 . 66 . 506 SAFE DRINKING WATER RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATION GRANTS OBJECTIVES : To conduct research relating to the causes , diagnosis , treatment , control , and prevention of physical and mental diseases and other impairments of man resulting directly or indirectly from contaminates in water or to the provision of a dependably safe supply of drinking water. Development and demonstration of any project which will demonstrate a new or improved method, approach, or technology for providing a dependably safe supply of drinking water to the public or which will investigate and demonstrate health implications involved in the reclamation, recycling, and reuse of waste water for drinking and/or the preparation of safe and acceptable drinking water. TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: This program is available to each State , territory and possession of the U. S . , including the District of Columbia , for public , private State colleges and universities , public agencies , State and local governments , other organizations and individuals , Profit-making organizations are not eligible . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility . FINANCIAL' INFORMATION: (Grants and Cooperative Agreements ) FY 82 est . $14, 792 , 700 . Range and average of financial assistance : FY 82 (projected) average $115 ,000. -42- 66 . 507 TOXIC SUBSTANCES RESEARCH GRANTS OBJECTIVES : To support and promote the coordination of research projects relating to the effects , extent , prevention, and control of toxic chameical substances or mixtures . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: This program is available to each State , territory and possession of the U.S . , including the District of columbia , public or private State universities and colleges , hospitals , laboratories , State and local government departments , other public or private nonprofit institutions and individuals who have demonstrated unusually high scientific ability. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION : (Grants ) FY 82 est . $8 , 167 ,000 . Range and average of financial assistance : FY 82 (projected) average $129 ,000. OFFICE OF PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT 66 . 603 LOAN GUARANTEES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TREATMENT WORKS OBJECTIVES : To assist and serve as an incentive in construction of municipal sewage treatment works which are required to meet State and Federal water quality standards . To ensure that inabil- ity to borrow necessary funds from other sources on reasonable terms does not prevent the construction of any wastewater treat- ment works for which a grant has been, or will be awarded. TYPE OF AID: Guaranteed/insured loans . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: A State , interstate agency, a municipality, or an intermunicipal agency, which has applied for a construction grant under Title II of the Act ( including grantees whose projects are eligible for reimbursement under Section 206 of that title ) or which has committed itself to finance the local share of any project ( s ) for which a grant has been awarded, or for which an application is bing processed. This program is available to each State , territory and possession of the U.S . , including the District of columbia. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Loans guaranteed) Not separately identifiable . ACTION 72 .001 THE FOSTER GRANDPARENT PROGRAM (FGP) OBJECTIVES : Dual purposes of the program are ( 1 ) to provide part- time volunteer service opportunities for low-income persons age 60 and over and ( 2 ) to give supportive person-to-person service in health, education, welfare and related settings to help alleviate the physical , mental , and emotional problems of children having special or exceptional needs . -43- TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Grants are made only to public or private nonprofit agencies or organizations , including State and local governments . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Foster grandparents must be : 60 years of age or over, with an annual income at or below eligibility levels set by the Director of ACTION, interested in serving children, and must be physically , mentally, and emotionally capable of serving the selected children on a person-to-person basis . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $48 ,990 ,000. Range and average of financial assistance : $89 ,000 to $1 ,060 ,000 ; $230,000 . 72.002 RETIRED SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM (RSVP) OBJECTIVES : To establish a recognized role in the community and a meaningfullife in retirement by developing a wide variety of community volunteer service opportunities for persons 60 years of age or over through development of community oriented , cost-shared projects . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Grants are made only to public and private nonprofit organizations including State and local governments . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Retired persons aged 60 and over. FINANCIAL INFORMATION : (Grants ) FY 82 est . $28 ,691 ,000 . Range and average of financial assistance : $10 ,000 to $450 ,000; $36 ,810 . 72 .003 VOLUNTEERS IN SERVICE TO AMERICA (VISTA) OBJECTIVES : To supplement efforts of community organizations to eliminate poverty and poverty - related human, social , and environ- mental problems by enabling persons from all walks of life and all age groups to perform meaningful and constructive service as volunteers in situations where the application of human talent and dedication may help the poor to overcome the handicaps of poverty and poverty - related problems and secure opportunities for self-advancement . TYPE OF AID: Grants and assistance . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Sponsors applying for VISTA Volunteers must be public agencies or private nonprofit organizations ; including State and local governments . The project in which they propose to use the volunteers must be designed to assist in the solution of poverty related problems . Sponsors receiving program grants in excess of $25 ,000 must be incorporated nonprofit organizations and capable of managing grant funds and maintaining auditable records of disbursements . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Persons who are assisted by VISTA Volun- teer activities must be low-income and VISTA activities must directly benefit the poor. -44- FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Direct program costs only) FY 82 est . $20 , 744,000 . Range and average of financial assistance: Operating grants depend entirely upon the number of volunteers involved in the program. 72 .004 UNIVERSITY YEAR FOR ACTION (UYA) OBJECTIVES : To strengthen and supplement efforts to eliminate poverty and poverty-related human, social , and environmental problems by enabling students enrolled in institutions of higher education to perform meaningfuland constructive volunteer ser- vice in connection with the satisfaction of such student ' s course work in agencies , institutions , and situations where the application of human talent and dedication may assist those per- sons afflicted with problems of poverty. TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Institutions of higher education or associations of such institutions ; State and local governments and public and private nonprofit organizations may be eligible for special demonstration grants . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Poverty communities . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $348,000 (continua- tion grants only) . Range and average of financial assistance : Operating grants ranged from $30 ,000 to as large as $210 ,000 , depending entirely upon the program to be implemented, the number of volunteers involved in the program, and the amount of cost- sharing. 72 .005 NATIONAL CENTER FOR SERVICE - LEARNING OBJECTIVES : To assist secondary and post-secondary educators to begin new, and improved existing local student service-learning programs which provide services to the poverty community. TYPE OF AID: Advisory, training and grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Any college or high school , desiring to create a new service-learning program, or improve an existing program, may apply for free technical assistance materials and consultant services . Any local agency which uses student volun- teers , and any State or national organization desiring to assist the development of service-learning programs may also apply. Training is available for directors and advisors of student volunteer and service-learning programs . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: High school and college student volun- teers ; secondary and post-secondary educators ; social service agencies which use students in their programming. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FY 82 est . $1 ,830 ,000. 72 .008 THE SENIOR COMPANION PROGRAM ( SCP) OBJECTIVES : To provide volunteer opportunities for low-income older people which enhance their ability to remain active and -45- provide critically needed community services ; to provide long term care by assisting adults , primarily older persons with mental , emotional and physical impairments , to achieve and maintain their fullest potential to be healthy and to manage their lives independently through development of community oriented, cost-shared projects . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Grants are made only to public or private nonprofit agencies or organizations , including State and local governments . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Senior Companions must be : 60 years of age or over, with an annual income at or below levels set by the Director of ACTION; interested in serving adults , and must be physically, mentally, and emotionally capable of serving on a person-to-person basis . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $10 , 718 ,000. Range and average of financial assistance : $145 ,000 to $262 ,000; $182 ,000 . 72 .010 MINI-GRANT PROGRAM (MINI-GRANTS ) OBJECTIVES : To utilize and promote volunteering and voluntary action; to mobilize volunteers to impact on a community problem; to assist organizations , particularly low-income and community- based groups ; to initiate , strengthen and/or supplement volunteer efforts and to encourage broad-based volunteer citizen participa- tion which will develop and enhance community self-reliance . Intended to meet a broad range of basic human needs , particularly those related to poverty, such as health and nutrition, food and water, knowledge and skills , economic development and income , housing, community services , energy conservation, and legal rights . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Public agencies or private nonprofit organ- izations , including hospitals or institutions of higher education, and units of State and local government which utilize , or will utilize , volunteers as an integral part of their provision of services . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Communities having human, social and environmental problems , particularly those related to poverty. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $300 ,000 . Range and average of financial assistance : $500 to $5 ,000 for local projects and up to $10 ,000 for statewide projects ; average ; $3 ,500. 72 .012 SPECIAL VOLUNTEER PROGRAMS (DEMONSTRATION GRANTS ) OBJECTIVES : To strengthen and supplement efforts to meet a broad range of human, social , and environmental needs , particularly those related to poverty , by encouraging and enabling persons from all walks of like and from all age groups to perform con- structive. volunteer service ; to test or demonstrate new or improved volunteer delivery systems or methods ; to encourage wider volunteer participation, particularly on a short-term basis ; and to identify segments of the poverty community which could benefit from volunteer efforts . -46- TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local government agencies and private nonprofit organizations are eligible . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Individuals , communities , or institutions having human, social , and environmental problems , particularly those related to poverty. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $1 , 511 ,000. Range and average of financial assistance : $15 ,000 to $125 ,000 ; $33 ,000. 72 .013 SUPPORT SERVICES ASSISTANCE ( SSA GRANTS ) OBJECTIVES : To increase the capability of small voluntary organi- zations to respond to the training, technical assistance and management needs of volunteers and organizations undertaking voluntary efforts ; to stimulate capacity building of grass roots organizations with volunteer components ; and to develop and exchange materials and information related to volunteering. TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Restricted to State and local governments , public agencies or private nonprofit organizations , and institu- tions of higher education. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Communities or organizations having human, social and environmental problems , particularly those related to poverty, which involve volunteers . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $230 ,000 . Range and average of financial assistance : Average grant is $20,000. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 81 .002 MOTION PICTURE FILM LIBRARIES OBJECTIVES : To increase public understanding of energy problems and the resource , conservation, and technology options which may be applied , through the production, acquisition, and distri- bution of 16mm motion pictures on a variety of energy subjects . TYPE OF AID: Information services . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Educational , civic , industrial , professional , youth, and Federal , State , and local government organizations , and television stations may borrow films from DOE film libraries . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FY 82 est . $100 ,000. 81 . 023 INFORMATION SERVICES - EXHIBITS , PUBLIC SPEAKERS , AND PUBLICA- TIONS ( PUBLIC AWARENESS ) OBJECTIVES : To disseminate general and practical information relat- ing to the nature and scope of energy problems and actions the federal government , particularly the Department of Energy, is taking with respect to them. -47- TYPE OF AID: Dissemination of technical information. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Any person or organization may obtain ser- vice . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FY 82 est . $600,000 . 81 .038 ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION CLEARINGHOUSE (EIAC) OBJECTIVES : To serve as the central Energy Information Adminis- tration (EIA) clearinghouse for the review and registration of EIA information products and data bases and to provide documenta- tion and dissemination services . TYPE OF AID: Information services . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Federal , State and local governments ; academic institutions ; industrial and commercial organizations ; and the general public . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $1 ,250 ,000. 81 .039 NATIONAL ENERGY INFORMATION CENTER (NEIC) OBJECTIVES : To serve as the central Energy Information Adminis- tration Office for providing energy information and assistance in support of Federal agencies ; State and local governments ; the academic community; industrial and commercial organizations ; and the general public . TYPE OF AID: Information services . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local governments ; academic and other nonprofit institutions ; industrial and commercial organiza- tions ; and the general public . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est. $900 ,000 . 81 .042 WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE FOR LOW-INCOME PERSONS OBJECTIVES : To insulate the dwellings of low-income persons , par- ticularly the elderly and handicapped low-income , in order to conserve needed energy and to aid those persons least able to afford higher utility costs . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: States , including the District of Columbia, and in certain instances , Native American tribal organizations . In the event a Slate does not apply) a unit of general purpose local government , or Community Action Agency within that State becomes eligible to apply. -48- BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: All low-income households will be eligible to receive weatherization assistance . A low-income household is ore whose combined income falls at or below 125 percent of the poverty level determined by the Office of Management and Budget , or the basis on which Federal , State or local cash assistance payments have been made . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 81 est . $175 ,000 ,000; and FY 82 est . $0 . (This program is being proposed for rescission in FY 81 and elimination in FY 82 . ) 81 .050 ENERGY FXTENSION SERVICE OBJECTIVES : To encourage individuals and small establishments to reduce energy consumption and convert to alternative energy sources . To assist in building a credible , nonduplicative , State-planned and operated energy outreach program responsive to local needs . TYPE OF AID: Formula grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: For fiscal year 1981 , grants have been awarded to all 50 States , Guam, the Virgin Islands , American Samoa , Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia , the Trust Terri- tories of the Pacific and the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas (hereinafter referred to as "States" ) . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Small-scale energy users ( including homeowners , renters , small businesses , local government , and other small public and private establishments ) , and groups which influence their energy consumption ( including architects , bankers and builders ) . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 81 est . $20 ,000,000 and FY 82 est . $0. (This program is being proposed for elimination in FY 82 . ) 81 .051 APPROPRIATE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY OBJECTIVES : To encourage research and development of energy related small scale technologies . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Individuals , small businesses , local agen- cies , nonprofit organizations and institutions , and Indian tribes . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 81 est . $12 ,000,000 ; and FY 82 est . $0. (This program is being proposed for elimination in FY 82 . ) 81 . 052 ENERGY CONSERVATION FOR INSTITUTIONAL BUILDINGS OBJECTIVES : To provide grants to States and to public and private nonprofit schools , public and private nonprofit hospitals , units of local government , and public care institutions to identify and implement energy conservation maintenance and operating proce- dures , and, for schools and hospitals only, to acquire energy conservation measures to reduce consumption. -49- TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State energy agencies are eligible to apply for financial assistance to conduct energy audits of schools , hospitals , local government buildings , and public care institu- tions ( public and private nonprofit institutions ) . Individual local governments and institutions are eligible for assistance to conduct technical assistance analyses . Energy conservation measures grants are avaiLable only to shcools and hospitals . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $100 ,000 ,000. Range and average of financial assistance : approximately $150 ,000 to $1 ,000 ,000 for Preliminary Energy Audit/Energy Audit program. Technical assistance analyses grants are $8 ,000 . Energy conser- vation grants are $60,000 . 81 .053 PUBLIC UTILITY REGULATORY INNOVATIVE RATES SUPPORT ( INNOVATIVE RATES PROGRAM) OBJECTIVES : To fund model projects for planning and carrying out projects designed to encourage conservation of energy, electric utility efficiency and reduced costs and equitable rates to con- sumers . Through these projects , DOE seeks to encourage local rate-making initiatives that go beyond the legal minimum require- ments of PURPP and which actually show promise of changing the electric regulatory ratemaking policies or practices . Emphasis is given to proposals which demonstrate transferability to other jurisdictions . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Awards will be made only to state utility regulatory commissions , nonregulated electric utilities , and the Tennessee Valley Authority. "State" includes the 50 States , the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the United States . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: State and local governments . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FY 81 est. $2 , 500,000 ; and FY 82 est . $0. (This program is being proposed for rescission in FY 81 and elimina- tion in FY 82 ) . 81 .054 PUBLIC UTILITY REGULATORY SUPPORT (PURPA GRANT PROGRAM) OBJECTIVES : To assist State utility regulatory commissions and nonregulated electric utilities carry out duties and responsi- bilities under Titles I and III , and Section 210 of PURPA. TYPE OF' AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State utility regulatory commissions which have ratemaking authority over at least one PURPA-covered electric utility, and PURPA-covered nonregulated electric utilities . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: State and local governments , and rural electric cooperative utilities . -50- FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 80 $8 ,900 ,000; FY 81 $0 ; and FY 82 $0 . (This program is being proposed for elimination in FY 82 . ) 81 .055 SMALL HYDROELECTRIC POWER PROJECT FEASIBILITY STUDIES ( SMALL HYDRO FEASIBILITY STUDY LOAN PROGRAM) OBJECTIVES : To encourage accelerated renovation and development of existing small hydro dam sites by loaning up to 90 percent of the cost of a feasibility study. TYPE OF AID: Direct loans . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Any municipality, electric cooperative , industrial development agency, nonprofit organization cr other persons ( including among others , individuals , partnerships , associations , and corporations ) . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FY 81 est . $10 ,000 ,000; and FY 82 est . $0. (This program is being proposed for elimination in FY 82 ) . 81 .058 GEOTHERMAL LOAN GUARANTEES OBJECTIVES : To accelerate the commercial development and utiliza- tion of geothermal energy by: minimizing a lender' s risk to assure the flow of credit for geothermal projects ; enhancing competition; encouraging new entrants into the geothermal marketplace ; develop- ing normal borrower-lender relationships and demonstrate the com- mercial viability of several projects . TYPE OF AID: Guaranteed/insured loans . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Any private or public ( including States , political subdivisions or Indian Tribes ) agency, institution, association, partnership corporation or other legal entity which has presented satisfactory evidence of an interest in geothermal resources and is cEpable of completing the project in an environ- mentally acceptable manner. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 82 est . $200 ,000. Range and average of financial assistance : No minimum, maximum is $100 million per project and $200 million per borrower. Average award to date is $27 . 2 million . 81 .059 CLEARINGHOUSE FOR COMMUNITY ENERGY EFFICIENCY (LOCAL OFFICIALS ' HOTLINE) OBJECTIVES : To provide information on Federal energy programs applicable to local governments and to serve as a mechanism for exchanging experiences among cities and counties on innovative energy activities . TYPE OF AID: Information services APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: City, county and State officials, public nonprofit institution/organizations and nongovernmental community groups may make inquiry of the clearinghouse . -51- BENEFICIARY ELTGTBTI,ITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FY 81 est . $3 , 100 ,000 ; and FY 82 est . $0 . (This program is being proposed for elimination in FY 82 . ) 81 .064 DOE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER OBJECTIVES : To manage the information products of the Department of Energy and to identify , acquire , process , and make available world-wide energy information to people and organizations , both within and outside of the Department of Energy, who are concerned with the national energy goals . TYPE OF AID: Information services . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local governments , schools and academic institutions , industrial organizations , and the general public . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) FY 83 est . $15 , 780 ,000 . FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY - UNITED STATES FIRE ADMINISTRATION 83 .005 ARSON TASK FORCE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ATFAP) OBJECTIVES : To assist States and localities to increase their cap- abilities for effective arson prevention and control by aiding in the development and implementation of Arson Task Forces as a man- agement systems approach to - the problem. TYPE OF AID: Training, advisory and information services . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: States , District of Columbia, Commonwealths , Territories , possessions , county and municipal governments . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expenses ) Not separately identified. FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION 83 . 205 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS PLANNING ( INDUSTRIAL CIVIL DEFENSE) OBJECTIVES : To provide technical information, guidance , and assist- ance to business , industrial and commercial firms , State and local governments and private facilities , and institutions , in the United States to develop facility plans and to organize for survival from nuclear disasters . TYPE OF AID: Training and information services . APPLICANT' ELIGIBILITY: Individuals representing business , industrial and commercial firms ; State and local governments and private facili- ties , and institutions . -52- BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Course costs and other expenses-salaries are not separately identifiable ) FY 82 est . $75 ,000. 83 . 207 NATIONAL SHELTER SURVEY ( SHELTER SURVEYS) OBJECTIVES : To identify shelter in existing buildings and mines , caves , tunnels , .etc . , sufficient to protect the nation' s popula- tion from the effect of nuclear weapons . TYPE OF AID: Advisory services provided through State . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State ( includes territories ) and local governments . Areas are selected for survey based upon the avail- ability of survey funds and upon the potential usability of additional shelter in each area . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Salaries and expense ) FY 82 est . $3 ,677 ,000 . 83 . 209 STATE RADIOLOGICAL DEFENSE OFFICERS (RDO' s ) OBJECTIVES : To develop the operational plans and procedures needed to integrate radiological defense (RADEF) support capabilities required in State and local emergency operation plans . In a crisis period under nuclear attack conditions, the RDO interprets fallout effects and provides technical advise to government leaders in Emergency Operation Centers for their use in directing efforts to help the population survive in a fallout environment . TYPE OF AID: Advisory services available through State . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Each of 36 eligible counterforce State emergency management (civil defense ) organizations must negotiate a Cooperative Agreement for this service with the respective FEMA regional office . State personnel must be under an approved merit system. Local governments may obtain services from the State emergency management (civil defense ) organization. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $2 ,020,000 ( 50 States , DC, Puerto Rico) . Range and average of financial assistance : $12 ,150 to $26 ,010 ; $15 ,416 ( 5 month funding period in fiscal year 1981 . 83 . 211 CIVIL DEFENSE - STATE AND LOCAL SUPPORTING MATERIALS OBJECTIVES : To maintain the civil defense readiness of State an local governments by furnishing matching funds for the purchase of equipment and supporting materials for State and local civil defense direction and control and alerting and warning systems . Fiscal year 1981 is a year for consideration demonstration projects that have the greatest potential for upgrading State-wide and State-area communications and warning systems capabilities . TYPE OF AID: Grants jointly with State . -53- APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State ( includes U. S. territories ) or State and political subdivision (city, county, township, etc . ) jointly. There must be a civil defense organization established pursuant to law; an emergency operational plan approved by the Federal Emergen- cy Management Agency; a Federal Emergency Management Agency approved program paper. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 82 est . $4 ,475,000 . DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 84.065 EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION AND RADIO PROGRAMMING OBJECTIVES : To carry out the development , production, evaluation, dissemination, and utilization of innovative educational television and/or radio programs designed for broadcast and/or nonbroadcast uses to help children , youth, or adults to learn. TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: State and local governments , public and private agencies , profit and nonprofit organizations , associations , institutions , and individuals . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Children , youth, and adults in formal and informal settings . FINANCIAL INFORMATION: ( Contracts ) FY 82 est . $6 ,000 ,000. 84.081 COMMUNITY EDUCATION ( COMMUNITY SCHOOLS ) OBJECTIVES : To provide educational , recreational , cultural , and other related community services in accordance with the needs , interest , and concerns of the community, through the establishment of the community education program as a center for such activities in cooperation with other community groups . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Local educational agencies and public agencies and nonprofit private organizations to plan, establish, expand, or maintain community education programs ; institutions of higher education for training grants . For further explication of applicant eligibility , see the regulation. BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants and contracts ) FY 81 est . $3 ,138 ,000 and FY 82 est . unknown. (This program is proposed for funding as part of the consolidated State Education Block Grant Program total- ling $173 ,270 ,000) . Range and average of financial assistance : $17 ,337 to $144 ,648 ; $54, 715 . 84. 115 INSTITUTE OF MUSEUM SERVICES OBJECTIVES : To help ease the increasing costs borne by museums as a result of their increasing use by the public ; to encourage -54- and assist museums in their educational and conservation roles ; to assist museums in modernizing their methods and facilities so that they may be better able to conserve our cultural , historic , and scientific hertiage . TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: A museum located in the fifty States of the Union, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico , the District of Colum- bia, Guam, American Samoa , the Virgin Islands , the Northern Mariana Islands , or the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands may apply for a grant under the Act . A public or private nonprofit agency , such as a municipality, college , or university , which is respon- sible for the operation of a museum may apply on behalf of the museum. A museum operated by a department or agency of the Federal Government amy apply only to the extent authorized by general principles of law applicable to the receipt of Federal assistance by these departments or agencies . Under the definition, a museum is a public or private nonprofit institution which is organized on a permanent basis for essentially educational or aesthetic purposes and which, using a professional staff , owns or uses tangible objects , whether animate or inanimate , cares for these objects , and exhibits them to the public on a regular basis . A museum must have at least one staff member , paid or unpaid , who devotes his or her time primarily to the acquisition, care or exhibition of objects . The regulation makes clear that the term "museum" includes aquariums and zoological parks ; botanical gar- dens and arboreta ; museums relating to art , history, natural history, science and technology; and plantetariums . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants ) FY 81 est . $50 ,000 ; and FY 82 est . $0 . Range and average of financial assistance : Fiscal year 1980 estimate $1 ,000 to $35 ,000 ; $25 ,000 . 84 . 134 TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEMONSTRATIONS FOR HEALTH, EDUCATION AND OTHER SOCIAL SERVICES OBJECTIVES : To promote the development of nonbroadcast telecom- munications facilities and services for the transmission, distri- bution , and delivery of health, education, and social service information. TYPE OF AID: Grants . APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY: Public or private nonprofit agencies , organizations , and institutions , including State and local govern- ments , the District of Columbia , the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and Territories or Possessions of the United States . BENEFICIARY ELIGIBILITY: Same as Applicant Eligibility. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (Grants and contracts ) FY 80 $1 ,000 ,000 ; FY 81 est . $0 ; and FY 82 est . $0. NOTE: The funds in this program are also available for program contracts . The amounts which can be used for such contracts cannot be predetermined. Range and average of financial assistance : $50 ,000 to $200 ,000 ; $120 ,000 . 2014 MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S . Cox, City Clerk RE: Developers Agreement for Minnesota Valley 6th Addition DATE: April 16 ,. 1982 Introduction At the previous Council meeting, an extension was granted to Mr. Wiggin giving him until May 14th to file his final plat . It was also decided that he should sign the proposed revised Developers Agreement , rather than the current developers agreement . If Council does not approve the proposed revisions to the developers agreement on April 20th, staff is recommending that Council approve the April 20 , 1982 draft agreement for Mr. Wiggin so that he may pro- ceedwith filing his plat. Background The attached April 20 , 1982 draft agreement is the agreement Council saw and discussed briefly on March 2nd, with three changes . Mr. Wiggin has seen and agreed to this form and did request the three changes now contained therein, which are as follows : 1 . Instead of the City paying only 5% interest on the money being held by the City in paragraphs VII E ( 1 ) and VII E ( 2 ) , the City will pay a greater amount based upon the average interest rate the City receives on investments , less 1%. Discounting the interest rate 1% provides a hedge for the City when interest rates are higher at the year end, than during the year. It is also reasonable to discount the interest 1% because amounts deposited with the City in escrow are typically small amounts and are not large enough to be invested by themselves at the interest rate the City is receiving because it invests larger amounts . 2 . A paragraph VII (G) is added so that the developer can select a payment method for his Plan B improvements . 3 . A paragraph VII (F) is added which provides that the 10% deposit in VII E ( 1) and the 50% overage in VII E ( 2 ) , plus accumulated interest , shall be applied to pay the balance of assessments due once there is sufficient funds accumulated to do so. Alternatives 1 . If the developers agreement has been approved by the City Council already this evening, disregard. 2 . If the developers agreement has not been approved by the Council already this evening: a) approve this agreement for Mr. Wiggin only, since it is acceptable to aim and the three changes listed are accept- able to Council . John K. Anderson, City Administrator 6 April 16 , 1982 Page Two b) amend this agreement and then approve it for Mr. Wiggin. c ) do not approve this agreement for Mr. Wiggin and require him to waitSuntil a revised agreement is approved by the Council 'and request that he execute same. Recommendation If Council has not approved a revised developers agreement this evening, staff recommends approving the attached agreement which will permit the recording of the final plat at Minnesota Valley 6th Addition since both Council and Mr. Wiggin are agreeable to the said April 20 , 1982 draft agreement . Action Requested Authorize proper City officials to execute the draft developers agreement dated April 20 , 1982 for the plat of Minnesota Valley 6th Addition. JSC/jms Rev. 3/29/77 DRAFT 4/20/82 ' Rev. ' 4/6/77 Rev. 4/11/77 CITY OF SHAKOPEE � Rev. 4/18/77 Rev. 6/1/79 SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Rev . 9/10/80 DEVELOPER' S AGREEMENT COUNTY FILE NO. DATE: THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of , 19 , by and between the City of Shakopee , a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota , hereinafter called "City" and hereafter called "Developer" . WITNESSETH: WHEREAS , the Developer has made application to the City Council for approval of a plat of land within the corporate limits of the City described as follows : hereafter called the "Subdivision" ; and WHEREAS , the City Council , by resolution adopted has granted conditional approval to the Subdivision on the condi- tion that the Developer enter into this Agreement to provide for the installation of street , water , sewer and other improvements as described herein . NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual promises and conditions hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed as follows : I . Definitions The following improvements as used in this agreement shall have the meanings stated : (A) "Street Improvements" - subgrade preparation, perma- nent surfacing, right-of-way grading or berm con- struction, traffic signing, sidewalks , and all appurtenant facilities ( as shown on the approved plans ) . ( B) "Sanitary Sewer Improvements" - sanitary sewers , lift stations and all other appurtenant sanitary sewer facilities . (C) "Storm Sewer Improvements" - storm sewers , inlets and all other appurtenant storm facilities . (D) "Watermain Improvements" - watermains , valves and all other appurtenant watermain facilities . -2- 1° (E) "Street Light Improvements" - street lighting includ- ing poles , crossarms , underground wiring transformers , pedestals and any other necessary appurtenances . II . Ownership Warranty of Developer The Developer hereby warrants and represents to the City as inducement to the City ' s entering into this Agreement , that Developer' s interest in the Subdivision is : Fee Owner Contract for Deed Purchaser Other ( specify) If developer is a Contract for Deed Purchaser, indicate Fee Owner. III . Designation of Improvements Improvements to be installed at Developer ' s expense by the Developer as provided herein are hereinafter referred to as Plan A Improvements". Improvements which the Developer has petitioned the City to install and finance on a cash and assessment basis are hereinafter referred to as "Plan B Improvements". IV. Plan A Improvements The Developer will construct and install at Developer' s expense the following improvements under Plan A according to the following terms and conditions and the General and Special Conditions attached hereto and made part of this Contract . Description of Improvement Location of Improvement A] B] C ] D] E] F] V. Plan AA':moanpveMemc s (A) Construction Plan and Approval Thereof The Developer will engage, at Developer' s expense , a duly registered professional civil engineer authorized to practice within the State of Minnesota to prepare detailed plans , specifications , and a cost estimate for com- plete installation of all Plan A Improvement , in accordance with City Design Criteria and Standard Specifications and submit same to City Engineer (and Shakopee Public Utilities Manager, when re- quired) for written approval prior to commencement of construction. -3- ( - (B) Developer The Developer shall submit to the City either cash, or upon written approval of the Shakopee City Attorney a certified letter of credit made pay- able to the City of Shakopee upon which the City may draw, in the amount of 1257 of the total project (as approved by the Shakopee City Engineer) including the costs of City inspection and administration, said cash' or certified letter of credit to be submitted when this agreement is executed. The City is hereby authorized to draw against the said cash or certified letter of credit as provided in Paragraphs V (F) and VIII ( D) . (C) Completion of Street Light Improvements For purposes of releasing this developers agreement and issuing a certificate of occupancy (conditional or permanent ) , the City shall consider the Street Light Improvements approved upon the developer entering into an agreement with Shakopee Public Utilities and paying any moneys required by the Utilities at that time. ( D) Building Permits The City may issue building permits when required improvements are substantially complete , as determined by the City Engineer; however, no per- manent certificate of occupancy shall be issued until all of the required improvements are completed and approved by the City Engineer, or until this agreement is replaced with a letter of understanding and a letter of credit in the amount of 125% of the City Engineer' s estimate of the cost of work remaining to be constructed as provided in VIII (D) , which replacement shall be approved by the City Council . ( E) Park Fund No building permit shall be issued for any lot within the proposed subdivision until any and all payments to the Shakopee Park Fund in lieu of land dedication as provided in Paragraph IX have been made . (F) Administrative and Technical Costs The Developer agrees to pay the City the actual administrative and inspection cost of the project . An estimate of such costs will be prepared prior to starting this proposed construction, after acceptance of the project by the City, and in accordance with paragraph V ( B) above . The City shall bill the developer on a monthly basis for these costs and all such bills shall be due and payable within 30 days of their mailing, and if not paid for within such time by the Developer , the City is authorized to draw against the cash or certified letter of credit submitted in accordance with paragraph V (B) . Services to be performed by the City shall include , but not be limited to the following: 1 ) The City will review and approve plans and speci- fications perpared by Developer' s engineer. -4- . 2 ) The City will provide adequate inspection of all Plan A Improvements . 3 ) The City will prepare "As-Built" plans of Plan A Improvements . (G) Construction of Plan A Improvements 1 ) Construction The construction, installation, materials and equipment for street improvements , sanitary sewer improvements and storm sewer improvements shall conform to the approved plans and the City of Shakopee ' s Standard Specifications and for watermain and street light improvements shall conform to the Shakopee Public Utilities Standard Specifi- cations . 2 ) Easements The Developer shall make available to the City, at no cost to the City, all perma- nent or temporary easements necessary for the installation of said Plan A Improvements . 3 ) Insurance The Developer will cause each person with whom the Developer contracts for the con- struction of any Plan A Improvement to furnish to the City the Contractor ' s Insurance Certifi- cates as specified in Article 35 of the General Specifications of the Design Criteria and Standard Specifications for Construction of Roadways , Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer. No construction shall commence until the City Clerk receives said insurance certificates and said certificates are approved by the City Attorney. 4) Faithful Performance of Construction Contracts and Bond The Developer will fully and faith- ITITITcomply with all terms of any and all contracts entered into by the Developer for the installation and construction of all Plan A Improvements and hereby guarantees the workman- ship and materials for a period of one ( 1 ) year following the City' s final acceptance of the Plan A Improvements , said guarantee to be in writing and in addition to the Maintenance Bond required by Paragraph 8C. -5- VI . Plan B Improvements The Developer has petitioned the City for the Installation of Plan B. Improvements as listed. Description of Improvement Location of Improvement A] B] C] D] E] F] VII . Plan B Improvements Plan B Improvements shall be insti- tuted , constructed and financed pursuant to M.S .A. 429 Improvement Projects as follows : (A ) Construction Plan and Approval Thereof The City will engage a duly registered professional civil engineer authorized to practice within the State of Minnesota to prepare detailed plans , specifications , and a cost estimate for complete installation of all Plan B Improvements , in accordance with City Design Criteria anc Standard Specifications and submit same to the Shakopee Public Utilities Manager, when required. (B ) Initiation Prior to execution of this Agreement , the Developer shall submit to the City Council a Petition as provided for by M. S .A. 429.031 sub- division 3 , requesting that Plan B Improvements be made and assessed against the benefitted properties , and that he agrees to the provisions of VII (E) 1 ) herein. (C) Construction Upon the City Council adopting a reso- lution determining the sufficiency of each petition, said Plan B Improvements ahll be administered and constructed , in all respects , as other City improve- ments made pursuant to the provisions of M.S .A. Chapter 429 and other applicable statutes . That is : 1 ) The City shall have sole responsibility for admin- istration of the project , 2 ) the City will not be responsible for meeting any completion dates scheduled by the Developer and shall not be responsible for any damages as a result of delays in the project , 3 ) the project administered by the City shall allow for any increase in project cost as permitted by M.S.A. 429 ( i . e . 125% of estimated costs ) , 4) the Developer and his engineer acknowledge that any changes or any additional work required shall be approved by the City . -6- (D) MSA. 429 Special Assessment Procedures The Developer will be required to execute a 1-007. Petition for the installation of all Plan B Improvements . If the City Council orders the installation of the petitioned for Plan B Improvements with the cost to be assessed against the benefited properties , the Developer agrees to pay such assessments on the fol- lowing terms and conditions : 1 ) Waiver of Ob 'ections To and Ri:ht of A• •eal from Assessment The Developer agrees to , and hereby does , waive and release (a ) any and all objections of every kind to any assessment levied by the City pur- suant to this Agreement , including, without limitation, objections to procedures and hearings before the City Council in connection with the Improvements and assessment therefor, objections resulting from failure to fully comply with any applicable statute , and objections to the amount of any assessment thereafter levied against the Subdivision or any other benefited property of Developer due to the Improvements stated herein, and (b) the right to appeal , pursuant to applicable Minnesota Statutes , from any assessment levied pursuant to this Agreement . It is understood by the developer that the City is doing this Chapter 429 Public Improvement at the developer' s request and for the developer' s convenience, and the City would not be. installing the improvements in ques- tion without this waiver. 2 ) Construction After approval of preliminary plans and estimates by the City Engineer, an improvement hearing will be called by the City Council for the purpose of ordering these Plan B Improvements . After approval of final plans and specifications by the City Engineer, bids will be taken by the City and con- tracts awarded for the installation of the improve- ments under the City' s complete supervision. 3 ) Levy of Special Assessments and Required Prepayments The entire cost of the installation of Plan B Improvements , including any reasonable engineer- ing, legal and administrative costs incurred by the City, shall be paid by the Developer to the City as special assessments levied against the benefited land. Reference herein to special assessments shall be deemed to include , and shall include , all interest due thereon in accordance with M.S . A. 429 . 4 ) Acceleration Upon Default In the event Developer fails to pay any install- ment of any special assessment levied -7- pursuant hereto, or any interest thereon, when the same is to be paid pursuant hereto, the City, at its option, in addition to its rights and remedies hereunder , by written notice given to Developer, may declare all of the unpaid special assessments which are then estimated or levied pursuant to this Agreement due and payable in ' full , with interest . The City, at its option, may demand immediate payment thereof and immediately commence legal action against Developer to collect the entire unpaid balance of the special assess- ments then estimated or levied pursuant hereto, with interest , including reasonable attorneys ' fees , and Developer shall be personally liable for such special assessments , and, if more than one , such liability shall be joint and several . ( E) Developer M.S .A. 429 Payment Methods Assessed or to be Assessed by the City The cost of Plan B Improve- ments shall be paid by the Developer in accordance with one of the two methods as set forth hereunder, the Developer having the option thereof. 1 ) Developer Payment Method One ( 1 ) : Ten ( 10) Percent Cash Deposit The Developer shall pay to the City in cash a deposit in the sum and amount of 10% of the City Engineer' s estimated total assessment for all such Plan B Improvements , said amount to be paid upon execution of this agreement . The cash so paid by the Developer to the City shall bear interest for each year at a rate equal to one percent ( 1%) below the average interest rate (rounded to the nearest quarter) on the invest- ments held by the City on December 31st of the respective year, until all assessments so levied together with any penalties and interest have been paid in full , at which time any remaining deposit and accrued interest shall be returned to the Developer. If the Developer fails to pay any assessments , interest or penalty as the same comes due , the City may draw on said deposit for any such amounts not paid. Those assessments as levied shall be paid by the Developer to the City as special assessments levied against the benefited land. On or before an occupancy permit (conditional or permanent ) will be granted for any of said lots , • pieces or parcels , the Developer hereby agrees to pay to the City the remaining principal balance , plus any unpaid interest and penalties , of all assess- -8- ments assessed or to be assessed under this agree- ment against said lot , piece or parcel , the amount to be determined as of the date said occupancy permit (conditional or permanent ) is granted. If the assessments governed by this paragraph have not been assessed, the developer agrees to pay the estimated assessment to be levied against the benefited land. The developer shall be liable to the City for any deficiency which shall become due and payable at the time assessments are levied and the City shall pay to the developer any overplus arising from payment based on an estimate plus interest in the amount of 5% per annum from date of payment to date of reimburse- ment . It is further agreed and understood that the payments required by obtaining an occupancy permit (conditional or permanent ) shall in no way limit or be used to offset the Developer' s obligation to pay assessments as they come due for those lots for which obligation shall continue until such time as all assessments authorized herein have been paid in full . Upon the payment of the assessment on any lot , piece or parcel , the City shall issue a release in recordable form so as to remove the recording of this agreement as against that particular lot , piece or parcel on which such payment has been made , provided all other conditions of this agree- ment have been met . 2 ) Developer Payment Method Two ( 2 ) : No Cash Deposit With Accelerated Assessment Payments The cost shall be paid by the Developer to the City as special assessments levied against the benefited land. On or before a certificate of occupancy (conditional or permanent ) will be granted for any of said lots , the Developer hereby agrees to pay to the City a sum of money equal to 150% of the remaining principal balance , plus any unpaid interest and penalties , of all assessments governed by the agreement against said lot said amount to be determined as of the date the occupancy permit is granted. If the assessments governed by this paragraph have not been assessed, the developer agrees to pay 150% of the estimated assessment to be levied against the benefited land. The developer shall be liable to the City for any deficiency in the 150% which shall become due and payable at the time assessments are levied and the City shall pay to the developer any overplus arising from payment based on an estimate plus interest in the amount of 5% per annum from date of payment to date of reimbursement . -9- The amount so paid in excess of the remaining principal balance ( the 50% overage) plus any unpaid interest and penalties against the lot on which the occupancy permit is granted shall be retained by the City as a deposit for payment of assessments against the remaining lots or parcels , and the amount so deposited shall bear interest for each year at a rate equal to one •percent ( 1%) below the average interest rate (rounded to the nearest quarter) on the invest- ments held by the City on December 31st of the respective year, until all assessments levied against the benefited property shall have been paid in full and at such time any remaining deposit and accrued interest shall be returned to the developer. If , however, the developer fails to pay any of the assessments , interest , or penalty as the same comes due , the City may draw on said deposit for any such amounts not paid . It is further agreed and under- stood that the payments required thereunder to obtain an occupancy permit hereunder shall in no way limit or be used to offset the Developer ' s obligation to pay the assessments as they come due for those lots which have not been transferred or for which occupancy permits have not been obtained, which obligation shall continue until such time as all assessments authorized herein have been paid in full . Upon the payment of the assessment on any lot , the City shall issue a release in recordable form so as to remove the recording of this agreement as against the parti- cular lot , piece or parcel which such payment has been made , provided all conditions of this agree- ment have been met . (F) Deposit/Overage Shall Apply Towards Assessments At such time as any amounts retained by the City under payment methods E 1 or E 2 , together with interest earned thereon, are sufficient to pay the remaining assessments , capable of being prepaid (excluding assessments which have been or are in the process of being certified to annual tax state- ments ) , the City shall apply such retained amounts to the remaining uncertified assessments , release the remaining lots from the assessment lien, and refund any overage to the Developer. (G) Developer' s Selected Payment Method Developer hereby selects Payment Method E ( 1) Ten Percent Cash Deposit or E ( 2 ) Accelerated Assessment Pay ments as set forth above . (H) Easements The Developer shall make available to the ' City , at no cost to the City, all permanent or temporary easements necessary for the installation of said Plan B Improvements . -10- ( I) Building Permits The City may issue building per- mits when required improvements are substantially complete , as determined by the City Engineer. VIII . General (A) Violation of Provisions of Agreement In the event the developer violates any of the covenants and agreements herein contained and to be performed by the developer, the City has the option to commence an action for specific performance requiring the developer to five up to the covenants and agreements and the developer agrees that the City shall be entitled to its administrative costs , legal costs , and reasonable attorney ' s fees in connection with said action. ( B) Binding Effect The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon the inure to the benefit of the repre- sentatives , successors and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the subdivision and shall be deemed covenants running with the land. Reference herein to Developer , if there be more than one, shall mean each and all of them. This Agreement shall be placed on record so as to give notice to subsequent purchasers and encumberances of all or any part of the subdivision and all recording fees shall be paid by the Developer. Upon the filing of a release from the City, all agreements contained herein shall there- after be inapplicable to any property covered by said release . ( C ) Notices Any notices permitted or required to be given or made pursuant to this Agreement shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States Mail to the ad- dresses hereinafter set forth by certified or registered mail . Such notices , demand or payment shall be deemed timely given or made when delivered personally or when deposited in the United States Mail in accordance with the above . Addresses of the parties hereto are as follows : If to the City - City Administrator City Hall 129 East First Avenue Shakopee , MN 55379 If to the Developer - ( D) Release of Developers Agreement Upon completion or partial completion of Plan A Improvements , the City may release all or a portion of the cash or letter of credit deposited under Paragraph V (B) , retaining 125% of the City Engineer' s estimate of the cost , -11- including City inspection and administration, to com- plete the improvements , provided however, that the Developer submit a Maintenance bond guaranteeing said improvements for a period of one year after final acceptance by the City. Should the Developer fail or refuse to submit a Maintenance Bond as provided herein, the City may retain some or all of the cash or letter of credit as security for the one year written guarantee as provided in Paragraph V (G) (4) . Should the certified letter of credit be for such a period of time so as to preclude its use under this paragraph, the City is authorized to draw against such letter of credit at any time to complete said improvements or to make such repairs or additions as • would be provided under the one year written guarantee when, in the judgment of the City, the City determines that the Developer is not going to complete such im- provements or make such repairs . ( E) Incorporation byReference All City of Shakopee Design Criteria , Standrd Specifications , including bonding provisions , the approved plans , addenda , change orders , special provisions , proposals , specifications and con- tract for the Improvements furnished and let pursuant to this Agreement shall be and hereby are made part of this Agreement by reference as fully as if set out herein in full . ( F) Changes from Plan A Improvements to Plan B Improvements aan from Plan B Improvements to Plan K Improvements It is agreed a d understood that the Developer, at its option, is authorized to enter into this Agreement providing for some Plan A Improvements and some Plan B Improvements . At such time as the Developer may choose after the execution of this Agreement , the Developer may, in writing, request that some or all of the improvements originally designated as Plan A Improve- ment be changed to Plan B Improvements . The City in its sole and absolute discretion may enter into a 'Plan A to Plan B Change Agreement ' which shall be recorded. It is specifically agreed and understood, however, that no changes made in accordance with this paragraph will in any way reduce , lessen, obviate or cancel in any way, manner or form the provisions or requirements of this Agreement respecting improvements under Plan A made prior to such change . In the event the Developer wishes to change some or all of Plan B Improvements to Plan A Improvements , then it shall apply in writing to the City for such changes and the City in its sole and absolute discretion may enter into a 'Plan B to Plan A Change Agreement ' which shall be recorded. IX . Payments to the Park Fund in Lieu of Land Dedication In accordance with the authority provided by the Shakopee City Code , Section 12 .061 , the Developer and the City hereby acknowledge that there is due and payable to the City under the terms of said Section by the Developer, the sum and amount of $ which amount was payable at the time of final approval of the Subdivision, -12- and payment of which the Developer has requested defer- ment until the issuance of building permits for the lots in said Subdivision. Therefore , the City agrees to accept payment of said amount on a per lot basis at the time of the issuance of the building permit therefore, as follows : Lots , $ for each lot . Lots , $ for each lot . Lots , $ for each lot . (A) The Developer hereby agrees that the amounts set forth above shall constitute a lien against said lots , which lien must be released in writing by the City prior to the issuance of any building permit on said lot. (B) The Developer agrees that under no circumstances will the amounts set forth above be paid any later than the 1st day of , 19 when the entire unpaid amount shall be due and payable immediately. (C) The Developer hereby authorizes the City to fore- close the lien herein created should the Developer, its heirs , assigns or successors in interest fail to make payments required hereunder , and does agree that in addition to any amounts foreclosed, the City shall be entitled to its administrative costs , legal costs , and reasonable attorneys fees in con- nection with said foreclosure . (D) The Developer hereby understands and agrees that should the ultimate density used for such a lot be greater than the density originally presumed to determine the amount to be paid, said amount will be recomputed based on the actual density, and said amount will be paid at the time of build- ing permit issuance . -13- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The City and Developer have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the day and year first above written. In Presence Of : CITY OF SHAKOPEE By Mayor By city Administrator By City Clerk In Presence Of: DEVELOPER By and By Its In Pr_scnce Of : FEE OWNER, if other than Developer By Its and By Its • STATE OF MINNESOTA) -14- ss COUNTY OF SCOTT On this day of , 19 , before me a Notary Public , within and for said County personally appeared , and to me personally known, being each by me duly sworn, did say that they are respectively the the and the of the City of Shakopee, the municipal corporation named in the fore- going instrument ; and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said municipal corporation by authority of its City Council and , and acknowledged said instrument to be tie free act and deed of said municipal corporation. (CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT) STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss COUNTY OF SCOTT On this day of , 19 , before me a Notary Public within and for said County , personally appeared and to me personally known, who , being each by me duly sworn, did say that they were respectively the and the of of the corporation named in the foregoing instrument , and that the seal affixed to said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors and said and acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. (CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT) STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss COUNTY OF SCOTT On this day of , 19 , before me a Notary Public within and for said County,personally appeared and to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn, did day that they were respectively the and the of of the corporation named in the foregoing instrument , and that the seal affixed to said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors and said and acknowledged said instrument to be the-Tee act and deed of said corporation. MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Policy op Garbage Service Refunds DATE: April 15, 1982 Introduction The City has no formal policy on refunds for garbage service as comparable to the policy on sewer service. Background The City receives requests for refunds on garbage service and the requests vary from one month's charge to six months and even a year's worth of charges. All garbage customers are billed monthly and the contractor is paid monthly for the number of customers on the pick-up route. Cusomers typically ask for a refund because they have not been putting refuse out for collection and have not notified us to cancel service. Consequently, although there is no refuse, the contractor goes by the address to make the collection and the City pays him for this. If the City pays the request for refund, it comes out of the City's "pocket". In the cases of erroneous billings the City does make refunds. Alternatives 1. Make refunds based on customer claims for non-use of service. 2. Make refunds for any unpaid bills when claim is received. 3. Make no refunds and cancel service/billing when requested. Recommendation Alternative number three is recommended. Service has been rendered by the contractor going by to make the collection whether refuse is put out or not. Also, customers should be questioning a bill or service in a timely manner and not expect a utility to go back several months to make refunds because they failed to give notice of service cancellation. Action Request that City Council move to adopt the policy of not refunding garbage collection service charges for the reason of non-use of the service unless the billing is in error. GV/ljw /0/ MEMO TO : John K . Anderson City Administrator FROM : R. R. Spurrier City Engineer 111 - - RE: Levee Drive - Scott Street, o Sommerv.Ile Street DATE : April 2, 1982 Introduction : Attached is Resolution No. 1993. Action Requested : Adopt Resolution No. 1993, A Resolution Receiving A Report And Calling A Hearing On Improvement Levee Drive - Scott Street to Atwood Street and Levee Drive - Lewis Street to Sommerville Street. HRS/jiw Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 1993 A Resolution Receiving A Report And Calling A Hearing On Improvement Levee Drive - Scott Street to Atwood Street And Levee Drive - Lewis Street to Sommerville Street WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 1778, of the City Council adopted January 6, 1981, a report has been prepared by Henry R. Spurrier, City Engineer, with reference to the improvement of Levee Drive between Scott Street and Sommerville Street by roadway and storm sewer and this report was received by the Council on April 6, 1982. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA : 1. The Council will consider the improvement of Levee Drive between Scott Street and Sommerville Street in accordance with the report and assessment of abutting and benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $97,700. 00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 18th day of May 1982 at 8:30 P.M. , or thereafter in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 129 East 1st Avenue and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. 3. The work of this project is hereby designated as part of the 1982-3 Public Improvement Program. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of , 1982. Mayor of the City of- Shakopee ATTEST : MEMO TO: John K. Anderson City Administrator , i FROM: H. R. Spurrier OV City Eng,ineer �- RE: Turn Back of Part of Trunk H ghway 187 Renumbered 101 to the City of Shakolopee Release No. 142 DATE: April 7 , 1982 Introduction: Last July, the attached material was forwarded to Engineering Department so that City right-of-way maps could be updated. The material was put in the update file and because map updates have a low priority, the material was not noted until a week ago. Background : The attached material turns back those parcels and the roadway within them, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 161 . 16 and 161 . 24. The City of Shakopee has maintained these roadways for approximately three years . These documents formalize that responsibility. Action Requested: Direct the recording of the quit-claim deed from the Minnesota Department of Transportation to the City of Shakopee for a part of Trunk Highway No. 187, Renumbered 101, to the City of Shakopee. HRS/j iw Attachment 4 /c r ��r1NESpT� ! a� tiQ Minnesota Department of Transportation A c< 4-1 Qpm Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155 ti), OF TRP' July 10, 1981 Phone612-296-6967 Ms . Judith S. Cox City Clerk City Hall : 129 E. 1st We. Shakopee , Minnesota 55379 In reply refer to: 360 S.P. 7005 (101 ) Turnback of a Part of Trunk Highway No. 187 Renumbered 101 to the City of Shakopee Release No. 142 Dear Ms . Cox: Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 161. 16 and 161 . 24, the State of Minnesota has conveyed by a Quit Claim Deed, executed by Honorable Albert H. Quie, Governor , a portion of the above referenced Highway No. 101 to the City of Shakopee; as shown as the shaded area on the attached right of way map and legally described in said deed . This conveyance was authorized for release April 1 , 1980. It is vitally necessary to maintain and help perpetuate a pro- per and valid chain of title on behalf of the State as well as all adjoining land owners. We, therefore, request that you record this deed as soon as possible. If you require additional information, call Mr . Neal Bartelt, Office of Right of Way, or write this office. Sincerely,] t � l , • A. 'J. Hansen, P.E. Office of Right of Way ya AJH: ssd301- 1 19x1 Enc. RW00002171E art °F SHAD°PEE An Equal Opportunity Employer (Oo MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S . Cox, City Clerk RE: Reapportionment of Precincts in Shakopee DATE: April 13.,. 1982 Introduction The five year period during which no changes in precinct boundaries may be made has expired. Background Since tit2 law will now permit the City of Shakopee to reapportion its precincts , I recommend the City Council consider changing its precinct boundaries . If you will recall , last summer the City divided the 3rd and 4th precincts at the request of Scott County in order that they could reapportion their commissioner districts . This particular delinea- tion of precinct lines is not in the best interest of the City of Shakopee. I have prepared two new plans for precinct changes for Council con- sideration. In redrawing precinct lines , boundaries should follow visible , clearly recognizable physical features. My goal is to redefine the boundaries creating five somewhat equal precincts . Alternatives 1 . Plan "A" - Current precinct boundaries . PROS - this plan was adopted to facilitate reapportionment of county commissioner districts . It is no longer needed. The commissioner districts are now set for the next ten years and any deviation from this plan will mean that all residents in a given precinct may not be represented by the same commissioner. This hastle in conducting elections in inevitable , because Shakopee is too large to be repre- sented by only one commissioner. CONS - the fourth precinct is not large enough to warrant subdivision. The third precinct is large enough to consider some reduction in pop- ulation; however , the division at 11th Avenue doesn' t help because the population South of 11th Avenue is only 200. Running two polling places out of Eagle Creek Town Hall is not desireable. We used a Junior High School hallway for a polling place with the understand- ing that it was just for one year. 2 . Plan "B" - Return precinct boundaries to four precincts which existed prior to the changes made last summer. PROS - none . ' This is more desirable than having fewer than four pre- cincts only. John K. Anderson Page Two April 13 , 1982 CONS - some precincts are much larger than others and it would be advisable to try and even them out at this time . 3 . Plan "C" - Second precinct is enlarged thereby decreasing the size of the third precinct , and the first precinct is subdivided at 10th Avenue , thereby creating a fifth precinct . PROS - the precincts are brought into a closer balance with the excep- tion of the area in first precinct South of 10th Avenue which is where new development is occurring. We need two new polling places with this plan. One for third precinct because the Utilities is planning on remodeling their meeting room, and one for the new pre- cinct South of 10th Avenue. I have contacted the pasters at Christ Lutheran Church on 10th and Jefferson and the Presbyterian Church on Marschall Road. I have viewed the fellowship halls at both churches and believe they would adequately serve the needs of a polling place . Christ Lutheran Church has agreed to let us use their facility. There appears to be no problem with our using the facility at the Presbyterian Church , however, I will not have a final okay until April 21st . I believe this is a very workable reapportionment for running an election. CONS - residents East of Marshall Road and West of the abandoned railroad still lie within the precinct whose polling places remains at Eagle Creek Town Hall . 4. Plan "D" - As with Plan "C" , the second precinct is enlarged thereby decreasing the size of the third precinct , the first precinct is subdivided at 10th Avenue , and in addition, a sixth precinct is created by combining that part of the third pre- cinct lying South of 11th Avenue with the Scenic Heights and JEJ Additions . PROS - this precinct would have to have a polling place closer than the Eagle Creek Town Hall which would be desirous by the residents , probably the Assemblies of God Church just West of the Medical Center. ( I have not yet contacted them about using their fellowship hall . ) CONS - creates a small sixth precinct , which would require additional e ection judges at election time . With the abondonment of the rail- road , this boundary will no longer follow visible clearly recogniz- able physical features , which is required by law. . v John K. Anderson lb Page Three April 13 , 1982 Population by Precincts (pursuant to 1980 census )* Plan "A" Plan "B" Plan "C" Plan "D" Registered Current Six Precincts Prior. Five Revised Voters*, Precincts to July ' 81 Precincts Six Precincts 1 2175 3735 3735 2119 2119 649 1039 1039 1819 1819 3N 1366 2859 3085 2305 2079 3S 113 226 4W 751 1282 2082 2082 1368 4E 266 800 5 1616 1616 (' 940 - ;approximately one-half , or a little better , of the residents are registered to vote . . Summary I believe a precinct with a population around 2 ,000 is a reasonable size for handling paper ballots . Dividing Shakopee into five , somewhat equal precincts would adequately serve the needs of Shakopee voters and would balance the work load among the precincts . The recommended plan contains a minimum of changes as far as moving people..to new precincts , and keeping the same precinct numbers will limit confusion. Recommendation Plan "C" , creating five precincts is recommended. Action Requested Direct staff to prepare the proper ordinance establishing five pre- cincts within the City of Shakopee . JSC/jms ,../ ! / , -.6 ;: • :-,j,11 I i - 7/.2 ir i 1 / •. / , tt, : .: . ., i • . • ;,,/ ., ii.4 i , i Fi i , .. ....._, ,.... _ tip i . \ ) • -- - -,./ /,.__ . .. • ___, , / / I / • ' , ,1 •• i I_ f 1 1 1 '. i ,, • .. i III .! , 7--', . ' , •:: 1 ! ' P1, --7- :, lior/. • d e . 7 * ei • , .,/- ,, „:t-:''.,, ,,- -•iL / J, .., 1 ----/c-- -- - - rei ----- ir - ---,‘ 41 / ' - : ........„ ..• / / _.• ....._ \ , 4 , .. 1 ?.. e 0 ..: ill . , . i. iiii. _ , 1,I l• o 1 1 , ,,iiii/if l''':;'..• !I /I ., ). . l' I . I I / , '• ( / `.- ,t . __ lit I 1 I ' \ , 1 7i ,1 • I, - / 1 / 1 'I.. . • ; , i \ . ..„,„ , , • / 1 I .I. . / 1 1 •• , . • ,7 I..____._ . • ____ --1-- , . I ii , ,,,, ,,,77'''r '--1___ N , , I I . __ _____. _. _ _ __, LI • ,..„., .. ,. .1.. ... , . „ ,...,,..,.....c \, I , . , ,_, , ., , . _ , . n , lit _ .__ (r- 1 • 1 / / . ' ' !, ' ''‘,/'k I ii ,. 4---- +i• 1 4 . ---11 l'il ;AMP" I, III 1 .,V• ... Jr, .1) . P 1\ . ., lir I l? g- \-.... ..,-, 0 - - /• --t ir, .• i 1 P III ci c) , ,.. \ ,i.lies* touPPI . . ftil 1 t .Rsoimall . ;s- liovis i° i (j) r \ all iletiF1111....1 1 . / . 1 , - i •vell••10011111.11 •,i, 1 _ .iffillir..* 1100. Tit 1 t I n, , ...i. t. N., ,. . 1000111M . lielli4E••••41/411N1 CI) 1 11115 erielligrOPIng . 4/•I‘,. ,)•,.., ••-•-• ......_ v'-, - r ', sii.aim—„ 44/411111111 , . . V :51' • • (...)/ ,31.1.11--leirmi ,. ., i d •, '". i a 1111111 0 liarlii p I •t. •,^ ., ...1,,... - Nes •.# cj '. 6 .c.)--i I ' P ii-ovis - - • ' nt _ r/ -,.•.,:s., 'do • ...- . ._. I i / 1 \‘‘ ! . ----- 41n,...• ,. . .., . cn cr) co „,, a..... ‘11111L ' / 10 I •,-.4 CO CO LI) C\I CO\ a • '-t----..t r. I C/) N 0 CO C\I CV s e \a • .0i•:: -..1f3---: ..: — . ....,1-- --i,,- . • --....- 1 1 4'1_ • (i) m r I v. 71\ 4 L ¢ 0 0 4 • e 1 I fa. r.) ,---4 c\.1 c0 0)\•:t 'ct .A. , _._tril.................j.: -±.. „,... 1 / '' Ai , 1_, , , _,__T 1 , il . I.. _...... __________ .. I IV • ! /*** , I /, 1/1"1 /. I a Z' I I I 1 -- __ _ —. 1 , . 1 / alt 1 ;µ+ms ' J /i`� z 1 1 I 1 tlaa 1 , �_ 1 I 1 WN i, ....\ 4.e.) [ o w C ' \ Ll�__ A$IIV 1 I I ' I N n ' , i 1! ,3,.,s4 I N Z W 11\Y!— - .. - .... O / _I t w - .a _ -1H %711 I j r-, ..„, ‘ ‘ 1 .,,,,,„. .. A e , .. , ,,, , c, _ , _, ..,._ .__„ ..,...,0 . ,,.., , ,, ,, , , , , i , . _ _ ., ri)\\ ‘4 -.1kossi4W '11111111 ,:- --:--- (3 , swirli YIYw .. -_ 1�IrvyIlg- ,�� , 'Ft. - '�� iwwoc � 61 au �+` c. 04.1.,i w I wadi , fa.. . tMi .r fiiii i1 ) gise. ' tail' �v-'"-l ill1 l g T 15 \ - - V. 1I alt..000,,,,� 2 i �1 aI i :ICIfWil r--1 Pr ',,, A AAIIIIAIS _ I -- w I ,S ?Qb 1) IC - V----- 9 11:7___ __,L7J,rlili_11 4' ''. I 1 ,.. I+ !s ]! / .o.n.o. I ////�� �I is gwvov �_��_—_--.- "Z7�f1��- _�! ---L \\ s 's `is Jl, Jos r — (_ _'_ NVS �.4, r ow -- _.. r/ ____,,_,_,„ . , : , _. 4, U x j�• iIt. el( A. \ .,1 C-i in Q1 Ln N r • . a.. CO c0 c0 CO CO O O O �� t r,o• 11 d i '1 O7 1) 4H CY) N 14 \ b/ /A1 1 1 1 1 1 • 4. �� V I 11 ,c1. 0 ,—IN co • :/i'-1q -1 11 y, + 69 GH CO �� �� \a' ) �� ill i 1 r / t , i ---� , 7- , I ► tI , u, L___J , , r y� ma Si , , ti: EE I 1 1 11 1.2 w W ` µw. ! I (ill% 11 I �a� uNYYJ( I ZZ t i`._ I 1 — _ i:jd mrillie rwh (Jl. `` I , ` w; as 411918i ' i v ,wr. i �" fit I ) pill ! 4 CO W !� 1, .. 1 Z is, ✓u` 4 incur ' MVHf J______ __i_ _ -.___.-1 I — �� �� �' .4w �, ut �wnrq; i ef‘ EC:\ ::, , viOn 3 1"."14d1 4 Bis law ailiwt ______ I -111011° 0 r 1 ,t involmeom____ \ \ 0 1 1 , . 1 , . F-1- it be` 6[ as •.N(OW 4410 U r Ate• i F1 r w ��� •K1kC 1 ) s y' term, ,2,_-- 011iellit; 11 l"all4 sill I I I .,,,ii MI. 111 OM l'i ii I eor ...,, ,_ ...._ , OV 03 --:' -0"11 '\a 1-31 ' IN 2 Ali Fit Q 11 .l li t �� , I 1 o I / " S,s1 Imo— �� _T_ --- --0 � ' i / \ \ Willj). h ; 1 I I iNsv s 1I. It‹itIg z /may\`\\.\\ NNIIII . ri— - iril ili .ot Mil s-� i , cn zA1/4 •,--1i s rice l U O) 0) tf) CV • ,--iC� • N‘,, / / a rs I, ro ! I N y y I I 1 _ / / i 1 IC // II1 a ., lr \ l h9—08-6-3 I 1 1 (6 - I I 1 1i / t . / 1—r - / \\\\ 1. ) —--\ ii . I—4 / 44. °° 11 • ' = )„1,., % /11 , , ' . 7 • 7-,. or 1 Ial I A 1 0 \ i /k1NI�l1 1 0j ' I f- is 1 Z I ( 11 ' / •T- - �S j + 1 YY / ''/- ' N ) . 'Ai If,fl,wi 1 I ! % - 1 i �® it 1 / ;''''.. � - - I \ 1,1)4...- � MIMS V _ --. t tl 01I1F 1iwniN ` l_� I S 3 Ynrr OhA \ ".I. 0 -AC - ''.-t r ±- -‘--- ,i- t i \ \ 'v stiSr lialle!= \ , ‘I- II 14.V41 _NIP. ll lif \1St., 112411-411 I i I 1:,.pp 6l cht swim! • r e 11'11.tro___,..1,„,4.1.41st 'Al I Ike it elti is‘ mg , AM I I si$ _ I I aA I : \ Vr:1 .1 .,.k., i SU; .1 ...!...4,t: 0111 1. annm. if-71 ii F---1 0 ) -.., 1- - L Chil 03 s r� CJ _ O� iA, 41 (� �(i c 0 Tr i 1 IG ' .wov •� l � � 1 � - - - .-- ..--.....1�...� _,......7-_—___ IG 1ji UG �_ � Nd..,. (- ',',‘,--r `)r�1�l lI 1 UGI _ 0 S / U \� •� N(4_rx -L -1 .l._...i`_n i _ Ji.e:. -i. , I a.. /A,, % , = 1 ' [ i r. / !, H IS •�04 ll r C. Ca w CO 0 CO a/ / J w .—, N,,,,:,- .. / 11 'y toNr-1 Nr1 , ,\ w . ' g i1 1 N - b " I1 l ,N ' t ��� � '� 4ei/ \� II �' e9 as 0D • MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Subdivision Requirements DATE: April 15 ,. 1982 Introduction The attached are the minutes of the March 10 , 1982 ICC meeting. Page two of the minutes includes a recommendation to Council regarding zoning and subdivision requirements . The report cited in the motion is also attached. Background As the minutes indicate , the motion grew out of a review of engineer- ing specifications for public improvements . I believe that the motion should be forwarded to the Planning Commission for their review; however, Council should be aware that the Planning Commis- sion reviewed the same report within the last six months and decided not to make any changes in lot size , etc . Since the two advisor bodies apparently feel differently about the need to implement some of the report ' s recommendations , it would probably help if some of the ICC members attended the Planning Commission meeting when the subject is discussed. Alternatives 1 . Forward the item to the Planning Commission. 2 . Send it back to the ICC stating that council does not feel it should be pursued. 3 . Send it to the Planning Commission with the recommendation that they can invite the ICC to the meeting when it is discussed. Recommendation Staff recommends alternative No. 3 . Action Requested Move to forward the May 1981 Joint Report of the Metropolitan Council and :he Association of Metropolitan Municipalities on "The Cost of Public Services for Housing" to the Planning Commission to consider how it relates to the City' s Subdivision Ordinance , including con- sideration of reducing current lot size requirements among other things , as recommended by the Industrial Commercial Commission. JKA/jms MINUTES INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL COMMISSION Shakopee , MN March 10 , 1982 • Vice-Chairman Al Furrie called the meeting to order at 5 : 05 p .m. in the Council Chambers of City of Shakopee , MN . Present : Al Furrie , Paul Wermerskirchen, John Manahan , Gary Eastlund, Jane DuBois Advisor Bill Wermerskirchen , Sr. Absent : Jim O ' Neill Guests : City Engineer Bo Spurrier City Administrator John ,Anderson Minutes of the January 13 , 1982 meeting were approved by a motion made by Gary Eastlund , seconded by Paul Wermerskirchen and passed. There was no February, 1982 ICC meeting. Vice-Chairman Furrie welcomed the two members recently appointed to the ICC : flary Eastlund and Jane Dulois . City Engineer "o Spurrier was present to continue with a discussion of engineering design standards . Central to the discussion was the topic of potentially "over-building" by possibly requiring too :stringent of :;tandard;; , to give in idea of the City in rela- tionship to other cities in order to assess reasonable limits of safety and maintenance concerns , yet doing all possible to give ' developers a break . John Anderson stated that the City Council will be holding a meeting on March 25 , 1982 at 7: 00 p.m. to revise the City 's Developer Agreement. Jo Spurrier reviewed specific design criteria for street width and depth , curb and gutter , sidewalks , and storm drainage. He pointed out that attempting to imple- ment design criteria which will reduce future maintenance costs does usually increase construction costs at the beginning of a project . Of all the design criteria , drainage is still not too specific. Bo Spurrier expects to be sending out a draft of drainage specifications soon. Also presented was information on lot size as relative to developer costs . Bo Spurrier cited a study that indicated that a metro lot size of 11 , 000 sq. ft. vs , a lot size of 7500 sq . ft . resulted in a developer cost of 56 ,32? vs . X4 , 100. respectively (at a raw land cost of x8 . 000. ) pane 2 March 10, 1982 ICC minutes Discussion followed on the apparent savings involved with smaller lct sizes . Jane DuBois said most home buyers are primarily in money savings than size of lots. Higher lot densities available in PVDs were considered to be overall more expensive than subdivision developments becayse of the nreater deticl involved in the plans . Another comment by [ o Spurrier indicated that City maintenance is at approximately the same level for lot sizes of 11 , 000 sc9 . ft. as for lots sizes of 7, 500 sq. ft. Discussion included what type of action and recommendations would be appropriate at this time . Jake Manahan requested current data be made available for consideration and John Anderson cited the report by the retropolitan Council which Jo Spurrier used in his lot size example as the most recent and applicable data. (The Cost of Public Services for Housing) The following points were made : average lot frontage reduced by 25% also reduce street and sewer/storm drainage by 25%, higher densities of PVDs compensate for higher costs in the plan preparation. Motion was made by John Manahan, seconded by Paul Wermerskirchen a to recommend to the City Council, with having an eye to Y�,YgK�{�` 1-increasing costs of housing and 2-various changes to be made to the City Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, that the City' Council exmmine changes to decrease cost in housing, particularly to adopting those changes as put forth in the above cited document. Motion passed. brief update was given by Bo Spurrier regarding the status of the r1rainage in the Industrial Park , in particular the capacity of the drainage ditches and detention ponds leading to Dean 's Lake . The dit hes will be 50 ft. wide at the bottom and will take care of a new 100 acres of development plus 200 acres more. Another brief discussion occurred on the status of the VIP Basin. It was stated thet the City is undertaking a preliminary analysis of the drainage the starts at O 'Dowd and Thole Lakes then: runs through the Upper Valley along old Roberts Pit. General discussion was held on attracting industry, presented by Paul Wermerskirchen. Motion was made by Gary Eastlund, seconded by Paul Wermerskirdten to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried. Next meeting will be April 14, 1982 . Respectfully submitted, Glenda Spiotta The Cost of Public• Services for Housing A JoInt Report o. f thek Metropolitan etropol itan C ouncil and the Association of Metropolitan Munici alitles May 1981 _. ...... ' I a .., ' ... '''''oti'il `;4'''l i''r-.1f;14,' ;7;.• ;140r;' ...: W * 5A N. •,''''"';,.- '',..', a4, , „,,,,,,..., ,, . , 60 1 .-. ,,.. is,.. , • , . - •... , ; .. , ,.., .,.::::,,..;.'I.4.' ''?" i ' * ‘. 1111/11i .5. 1610 , # „ ,..., , .7.,,,..-. • . ,,- 0 50 ' /447 k/c/ • =,&-',,r.:: .,,r, sItc, .,-„„, .;#4•.,, ;."', .. . 4,, 4 - 1.1%., 4 A ___ ______ SA I'Y viir • „SAN. • ,. . - . ,e-...-.-. w,---- _ .y....,... ,,,,,..,,e's t.4.1,.,.. • "- .if , i S r ..... ....'".....' .......".;:;••••••. ............../y. tov...... .....a. 4. k , Z' , * .....' - • , • , , _ ..e. , ,_ THE COST OF PUBLIC SERVICES • • FOR HOUSING A Joint Report of the Metropolitan Council and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities May 1981 Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area 300 Metro Square Building, 7tIi and Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Tel. 612 291-6464 Publication No. 19-81-023 Preparation of this report was financed in part by a comprehensive planning grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. �I • IV. FINDINGS REGARDING STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS City requirements and design specifications for installation of public improvements vary throughout the Metropolitan Area. This section reports the results of a survey of local governments on those requirements, and on a survey asking builders to comment on city requirements. Several constraints and considerations in planning for public improvements are then presented. As a framework for evaluating municipal requirements, standards recommended by various organizations are summarized and reviewed. REQUIREMENTS IN TILE METROPOLITAN AREA A questionnaire was mailed to Metropolitan Area communities in 1980 asking them to list requirements for 12 categories of public improvements: Street right-of-way width -- for collector streets, local streets and cul-de-sacs Street pavement width — for collector streets, local streets and cul-de-sacs Street depth design for collector streets, local streets and cul-de-sacs Curb and gutter -- whether it is required and type required Sidewalks — where required and width required, for collector and local streets Trails — whether required and design standards Stormwater design Sanitary sewer design Water service design Driveways — where required Street lights - whether required Trees — whether required Sixty-six communities responded, including all the larger cities in the Metropolitan Area. Most of those not responding were very small cities where little development takes place. Figure 1 shows a summary of the results. (For ease of comparison the recommendations of various groups discussed later are also shown in this table.) The table lists the range of requirements (the smallest and the largest) and the most common requirements among those listed. The complete set of responses appears as Appendix A. For some of the items listed (here is a wide range of requirements: for others there is greater unanimity as to what is required. For example, right-of-way width for collector streets ranges from 50 to 120 feet. While sidewalk widths range from four to six feet, 67 percent of responding communities require five feet. An examination of the tables shows that several cities have a range of requirements for certain items, allowing for flexibility to suit the situation. For example, II of the 66 cities responding, or 17 percent, specify a range of requirements for pavement width on local streets. • 7 I ' r An important area to examine is the requirements of developing cities, because that is where most of the new subdivision development will take place. These requirements will have the greatest impact on the development costs of new housing. Tables showing separate totals for developed, developing, and freestanding cities are in Appendix A. (Developed cities include the central cities and those suburbs with little land left for development. Developing cities are those in the path of,urban growth, and freestanding cities are outlying cities with a wide range of urban services, such as Waconia and Hastings.) The tables show that the responses of each of the three types of cities are similar to the responses of the total group. In some instances the developing cities have higher requirements than the other cities, particularly for street-pavement width. Listed in the table are some items for which the setting of requirements is not solely at the discretion of local government. One example is collector streets, many of which are state-aid streets for which the state sets width standards and other specifications. Figure 1 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA, AND ENGINEERING STANDARDS/RECOMMENDATIONS Standards/Recommendations City Requirements Standard(s)or Type of Requirement•• Range of Requirements Most Common Requirements Recommendation(s) Source' HOW -Collector Streets 50-120 ft. 66 ft.— 13 cities—20% 60 ft ULI (Table 1) 80 ft.— 14 cities—21% 70 ft. ITE 60 ft. MCH (cities with 120 ft. 12 cities (18%)have a range requirements also have of requirements;the bottom lower requirements;i.e., range is 60-70 ft.;the top is 70-120 ft.;80-120 ft.) 80-120 ft. ROW- Local Streets 44-80 ft. 50 ft.— 13 cities—20% 50 ft.single-family; ULI (Table 2) 60 ft. —42 cities—64% 60 ft.multi-family 60 ft.;50 ft.in hilly ITE low-density areas 50-60 ft. MCH ROW-Cul-de-sac diameter 50-120 100 ft.— 18 cities—33% 100 ft.turning circle HUD-FHA (Table 3) 120 ft.— 19 cities--29% 50 ft.pavement width; MCH (some responses may 100 ft.turning circle indicate pavement width; others turning circle) Pavement Width-Collector 22-52 ft.for single 44 ft.—22 cities—33% 36 ft. HUD-FHA Streets requirement; 36 ft. ULI (Table 4) 32-60 for cities with a 13 cities(20%)have a range 36 ft. ULI-ASCE- range of requirements. of requirements;32-44 ft. NANB up to 40-60 ft. 36-40 ft. ITE 36 ft. MCH Pavement Width- Local 20-40 ft. 32 ft.— 15 cities—23% 26 ft. HUD-FHA Streets (Table 5) 11 cities (17%) have a range of 26 ft.single-family; ULI requirements, 1524 ft.up to 32 ft.multifamily 32-38 ft. 30 ft. (extra allowed 1976 Engineers for snow storage) comments 26 ft. HUD-ASCE- NAHB 22-36 ft.depending on ITE slope and density 26-30 ft. MCH •These sources are abbreviated. For complete source,see listing at end of chart. •'Tables referred to in this column appear as Appendix A. 8 • Standards/Recommendations City Requirements d(s)or Type of Requirement"` Range of Requirements Most Common Requirements Recommerndat on(s) Source* Pavement Width -Cul-de-sac 15-100 ft. 76-90 ft.—21 cities32% ITable 6) — Pavement width: 26 ft.-cul-de-sacs up MCH to 300 ft.long 26 ft. HUD-FHA 20 ft.-cul-de-sacs up HUD-ASCE- to 300 ft.long NAHB Turning circle diameter: 50 ft.minimum ITE 80 ft. HUD-FHA 80 ft. MCH Depth Design (Ton Rating) --- Collector Streets (Table 7) 5-10 9—47 cities— 71% 9 MCH Local Street (Table 8) 3-9 5 —20 cities—30%/. M(;ti 7 28cities--41'%, Cul-de-sacs (Table 9) 7 7 —24 cities—36% Curb and Gutter Always Yes-No Yes -. 49 cities— 74% Required? (Table 10) Type of Curb and Gutter Most common: Required Surmountable concrete— 17 cities—35% (Table 11) Vertical-face concrete— 14 cities—28.5% concrete on collector; MCH rolled bituminous on Surmountable or vertical face— 13 cities—26.5% local Sidewalk Requirements- Most common: Collector Streets Always or generally required, (Table 12) both sides of street-- 19 cities—29% not required—28 cities—42% Sidewalk Width on 4-8 ft. 5 ft. —20 of 35 responses (60%) 5 ft. Collector Streets ITE (Table 12) "at least 4 ft."type of HUD-FHA street not specified 5 ft.minimum ULI 4 ft.;type of street ULI-ASCE. not specified NAHB Sidewalk Requirements- Most common: Local Streets (Table 12) Not required—42 cities—64% Sidewalk Width on Local 4-6 ft. 5 ft.— 14 of 21 responses (67%) "at least 4 ft.";t Streets (Table 12) type of HUD-FHA street not specified 4 ft.minimum ULI 4 ft.;type of street ULI-ASCE- not specified NAHB 5 ft. ITE Are Trails Required: Most common. (Table 13) Not required—47 cities —71% Design Standards for Trails Width (Table 13) 5-12 ft. 8 ft --8 of 13 responses Types of Surface Bituminous,crushed Bituminous—6 of 10 responses limestone,woodchip Is Natural Stormwater Yes-No Yes —65 cities (98%) Drainage Allowed Where Practical?(Table 14) 'These sources are abbreviated. For complete source,see listing at end of chart. "Tables referred to in this column appear as Appendix A. 9 Standards/Recommendations City Requirements Standard(s)or Type of Requirement•• Range of Requirements Most Common Requirements Recommendation(s) Source. PUBLIC STORM SEWER REQUIREMENTS Type of Design (Table 15) ' 3 yr.to 100 yr.rainfall 5-year—38 cities -- 57.5% Lateral lines-2 yr. MCH 10-yr— 17 cities—26% Sub-trunk lines-5 yr. MCH (100-yr.systems required for ponds or low areas.See Table 15. Minimum Pipe Diameter 8-18 inches 12 in. --46 cities— 70% (Table 16) Length of Open Drainage 300-1,320 ft. Requirements vary a great deal 750 ft, MCH Before Pipe Required (Question did not specify (see Table 17).Most common (Table 17) whether for hilly or flat responses are: terrain.) "Varies"— 11 cities— 17% No answer -- 14 cities—21% No regulation — 14 cities—21% SANITARY SEWER REQUIREMENTS Minimum Pipe Diameter- 6-16 in. 8 in. —9 cities — 14% 8 in. MCH Interceptor (Table 18) 12 in.—9 cities— 14% 8 in. 1976 Engineers No answer— 13 cities—20% Comments Minimum Pipe Diameter - 5-12 in. 8 in.—51 cities— 77% 8 in. MCH Lateral (Table 19) 8 in. 1976 Engineers Comments Manhole Spacing (Table 20) 150-500 ft. 300-350—21 cities—32% 400 ft. MCH 400--27 cities—41% 400 ft.for sewers 15" 1976 Engineers or less,500 ft.for Comments sewers 18"-20",up to 600 ft.where modern cleaning equipment available Service Line Diameter 4-8 in. 4 in.—45 cities—68% 4 in. MCH (Table 21) WATER SERVICE REQUIREMENTS Water Main Diameter 2-12 in. 6 in. —34 cities—52% 6-8 in. MCH (Table 23) Lateral Diameter (Table 24) 3/4-6 in. 6 in.—42 cities— 64% Service Line Diameter 5/8-2 in. 3/4 in.—23 cities—35% 3/4 in. MCH (Table 25) 1 in.—32 cities—48% 3/4 in. 1976 Engineers Comments •These sources are abbreviated. For complete source,see listing at end of chart. "Tables referred to in.this column appear as Appendix A. 10 SOURCES FOR STANDARDS/RECOMMENDATIONS IN FIGURE 1 HUD-FHA HUD Land Planning Handbook No.4140.3, Data Sheet 60-B,Genera/Advice on Street Improve- ments for Development of Typical One-Family Detached Houses. ULI The Community Builders Handbook. Urban Land Institute,Washington,D.C.,ULI 1968.This publication contains the recommendations of the Community Builders Council. Included in the group are architects and planners,builders,developers,real estate counselors,and mortgage lenders. 1976 Engineers'Comments Memorandum from Metropolitan Area members of the City Engineers Association of Minnesota to the Modest-Cost Housing Advisory Committee, 1976. ULI-ASCE-NAHB Residential Streets. Objectives,Principles and Design Considerations. ULI-Urban Land Institute, ASCE-The American Society of Civil Engineers,NAHB-the National Association of Home Builders. ITE Tentative Standards for Subdivision Streets,developed by a project committee of the Institute of Traffic Engineers, MCH Appendix Item 2,Modest-Cost Housing in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, Metropolitan Council, 1976.Memorandum from Graydon R.Boeck on Residential Land Development,Platting,Utilities and Sheets (see Appendix B on page 1. A survey of housing developers was also conducted, asking for their comments on municipal requirements for public improvements. Responses were received from 46 developers. They were asked if they believed municipal requirements on the whole were underdesigned, reasonable, or overdesigned in some areas. Responses to this question are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Responses of developers to the question: you think local requirements for public improvements are underdesigned or inadequate, reasonable, or excessive or overdesigned in some areas?" Local requirements are: Number Percent Underdesigned or inadequate 1 2% Reasonable 18 39% Excessive or overdesigned in some areas 26 57% No answer 1 2% 46 101000% Developers were also asked to state which areas of municipal improvements were overdesigned, if they answered yes to that question. These responses are shown in Table 2. Table 2 Areas where developers believe local requirements for public improvements are excessive or overdesigned (Multiple responses are listed) Item Number of responses listing this item Streets 7 Street width or "streets" in general 19 27 Street right-of-way 5 Street loading 2 Street design standards 1 Curbing requirements 14 Sidewalks (should be eliminated,or too wide) 7 Storm sewer design 3 Sanitary sewer pipe 1 Costs charged only to the developer,not the benefitting area 1 • 11 'I • APPENDIX A SUMMARY OF CITY SURVEY ON SUBDIVISION AND ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS Table 1 RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH Collector Streets Developed Developing Freestanding Total Width (ft.) Cities.' Cities2 Cities3 Number Percent 50 1 1 — 2 3% 60 2 7 — 9 14 66 5 6 2 13 20 70 1 4 3 8 12 80 2 10 2 F— 14 21 100 — — 1 1 1.5 60-70 2 — — 2 3 60-100 1 — — 1 1.5 60-80 or 66-80 1 3 -- 4 6 80-100 — 2 2 3 80-120 — 2 2 3 70-120 — 1 — 1 1.5 Not given — 5 -- 5 7.5 No collector streets 1 1 2 1.5 16 42 8 66 100% 1The central cities and those suburbs with little land left for development. 2Cities in the path of urban growth. 3Outiying cities with a wide range of urban services. Table 2 RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH Local Streets Developed Developing Freestanding Total Width (ft.) Cities Cities Cities Number Percent 44 1 — — 1 1.5% 50 1 11 1 13 20 60 10 26 6 <---- 42 64 66 — 1 — 1 1.5 80 1 — — 1 1.5 40-66 1 1 — 2 3 50-60 1 2 1 4 6 60-66 1 — — 1 1.5 Not given — 1 — 1 1.5 16 42 8 66 100 % • 16 - Table 3 RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH Cul-de-sac Streets Diameter (ft.) Developed Developing Freestanding Total Cities Cities Cities Number Percent 16-50 16 — 1 — 2 4 65 1 6 50 1 7 11.5% 80 1 2 9 14 90 2 1 1.5 100 1 1 2 3 110 — 1 6 9 3 2 3 1 1 27 110-120 — 1 1.5 120 1 Not given 4 13 2 1 1.5 2 3 19 29 -- 8 16 42 8 66 100% Table 4 PAVEMENT WIDTH Collector Streets Width (ft.) Developed Developing Freestanding Total Cities Cities Cities Number Percent 22-30 — — 32-40 1 4 5 107% 41-52' 8 1 11 17 Cities having a range of 14 5 27 41 requirements" - 6 No answer 1 8 1 13 20 8 1 10 15 16 42 8 66 100% '22 of the 26 cities in this category listed a requirement of 44 ft.This figure represents 33 percent of the 66 cities. "The bottom range is 32-44 ft.;the top range is 40-60 ft. Table 5 PAVEMENT WIDTH Local Streets Width (ft.) Developed Developing Freestanding Total Cities Cities Cities Number Percent 20-24 — 25-29 3 3 4.5% 2 8 1 30-34' 11 17 6 20 3 35-40 4 3 29 44 Cities having a range of 3 10 15 requirements" 4 6 No answer 1 11 17 _. 2 _.. 2 3 16 42 8 66 100% 'The most common requirement in this and all categories is 32 ft.;15 cities,or 23 percent of the total, have this requirement. "The bottom range is 15-24 ft.;the top is 32-38 ft. • 17 Table 6 PAVEMENT WIDTH Minimum Cul-de-sac Diameter Developed Developing Freestanding Total Diameter (ft.) Cities Cities Cities Number Percent 15-30 1 3 - 4 6% 31-45 1 7 2 10 15 46-60 2 4 1 7 10.5 61-75 4 3 ' ' 7 10.5 76-90 2 15 4 ' 21 32 91-100 4 6 1 11 17 Not given 2 4 -- 6 9 16 42 8 66 100% Table 7 DEPTH DESIGN Collector Streets Developed Developing Freestanding Total Ton Rating Cities Cities Cities Number Percent 5 - 3* - 3 4.5% - 7 4.. 1 •<---- 5 7.5 9 13 28 6 47 71 10 2 - - 2 3 Not given 1 7 1 9 14 16 42 8 66 100% 'oneisarange of5-9 -tom {� "two are a range of 7 9 ! � ..'- \ `� Table 8 DEPTH DESIGN Local Streets Developed Developing Freestanding Total Ton Rating Cities Cities Cities Number Percent 3,4 2 2 - 4 6 5 4 13 3 'E— 20 30 Range of 5-7 2 1 - 3 4.5 6 - 2 - 2 3 7 7 17 3 27 41 8,9 1 1 1 3 4.5 MnDOT min. _ 1 - 1 1.5 Not given _ 5 1 6 9 16 42 8 66 100% 7 D\ CD wqvk� �� - - to,1\ \ i, - 18 _,. _ Table 9 DEPTH DESIGN Cul-de-sac Streets Ton Rating CitiesDeveloped Developing Freestanding _ Cities CitiesTotal 3,4 2 '----- Number Percent 52 6 7 13 3 23 35 4 6% 7 -- 24 36 2 _ 8.9 5 16 3 2 3 Mn/DOT min. 1 1 1 Not given — 1 — 3 4.5 1 7 1 9 1.5 16 14 42 8 66 'one is a range of 5-7 100% Table 10 CURB AND GUTTER ALWAYS REQUIRED? Developed Developing Freestanding Cities Cities Total Cities Number Percent Yes 13 No 28 3 14 8 1 7 26% 16 26 42 8 66 100% Table TYPE OF CURB AND GUTTER REQUIRED Type CiDeveloped Developing Freestanding Cities Cities Total ties. Number Percent Surmountable concrete 1 Vertical face concrete 15 1 17 SW mountable or vertical-face• 8 6 26.5 Rolled bituminous 4 4 14 28.5 8-6-18 — — 3 5 13 26.5 Varies 1 � 3 6 1 1 2 2 13 28 8 -----_ 'Usually the responses stated scrmountable 49 100% was required for local streets and vertical-face for collector streets. QCIT — S—v R.M0 v fYT� 41 .0 ' CL_ --AC5 CO N • 19 Table 12 SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS Collector Streets Local Streets Number and Percent Number and Percent Requirement of Communities of Communities Always or generally required, 19 29% 6 9% both sides of street ' Always or generally required, 9 14<-- 2 3 one side of street Sometimes required 4 6 7 11 By petition only 1 1.5 2 3 Not required 28 42 42 64÷- Considering requirement 1 1.5 1 1 No answer 4 6 6 9 66 100% 66 10U% For collector streets,required sidewalk widths range from 4-8 ft.The most commonly required width is 5 ft.;21 (60 percent)of the 35 responses listed this requirement. Fourteen (67 percent)of the 21 responses listed 5 ft.as the requirement for sidewalk width on local streets.Responses ranged from 4-6 ft. Table 13 ARE TRAILS REQUIRED? Developed Developing Freestanding Total Cities Cities Cities Number Percent Yes 3 9 12 18% No 12 28 7 47 71 Sometimes,or on designated network only 1 3 1 <- 5 8 Considering - 1 - 1 1.5 No answer - 1 1 1.5 16 42 8 66 100% Design Standards for Trails Width - Eight feet is the most common width for trails (8 of 13 responses). Widths range from 5 to 12 ft. Surface - Bituminous is the most common surface required (6 of 10 responses). Other types of surfaces required are crushed limestone and woodchip. Table 14 IS NATURAL STORMWATER DRAINAGE ALLOWED WHERE PRACTICAL? Number and Percent of Cities Yes 65 < - 98% No 1 2 • 66 100% 20 ..... ..-..... „�....-..•sae+yalTR.�e-. ..nn..R+ 15 e PUBLIC STORMISEWER DESIGN Type of Design D veloped Developing Freestanding Cities Cities Total Citie3-year rainfall or less Number Percent 5-year reoccurring raipfall 11 1 10-year reoccurring rainfall 1241 3l 1 1.5% 50100 3 11 3 \ 38 57.5 ` 100 year rainfall 1 17 26 3 inch/hour 2 1 1.5 Natural 1 2 3 Flexible — 1 1 1.5 None 1 1 1.5 1 3 1 1.5 16 6 42 8 66 Si' x of these cities (5 developing and one developed) specified that, in addition, 100-year systems were required for ponds or low areas.One developed city specified that 75 100 year systems may upon review. y were •'Thrvee of these cities (all developing) be required I 1) specified that,in addition, 100 year systems were required for ponds.One developing city specified that 100-year systems were required for ponds and trunk systems. Mv �- oTe._ v bo -ck..c ._. SQ L Er k 7'diil�'T6 PUBLIC STORM SEWER PIPE REQUIREMENTS Minimum Pipe Diameter Develo Required (inches) ped Developing Freestanding Cities CitiesTotal Cities Number aw,r1J2147 Percent 11 16 42 8 'One of these cities specified that 12-inch C.B. leads were required,and 15-inch in the street. 100°f° Table 17 LENGTH OF OPEN DRAINAGE BEFORE PIPE REQUIRED Length (ft.) Developed Developing Freestanding Cities Cities Cities Total 300 Number Percent 400 3' 1 4 6 1 500 —— 16%1 750 600 2... 2.. •. 2 4 66 800 — 1 6 1 1000 1 1 1 1320 6 1 1 2 blocks 1 _ 6 9 No limit 1 -- 1 1 Varies ur case-by-case 2 1 1 No regulation 1 9 1 2 6 No answer 6 7 1 14 17 9 3 14 21 21 16 42 8 66 100% •In one city,r;mges to 500 ft. •'Flanges to 1,000 It. 'In two citie ,ranges to 1,000 ft. L-1E__VT ‘ , D k , \ 21 Table 18 SANITARY SEWER Interceptor Requirements Minimum Pipe Diameter Developed Developing Freestanding Total Required (inches) Cities Cities Cities Number Percent ' 6-10' 11-15" q 8 3 16 24% 16-20 — 2 1 13 20 21-25 1 2 — 2 3 5 — 6 9 26-36 Depends on system requirements — /-- 1 1 MWCC requirement — 3 1 \ 4 2 2 36 N/A 3 — 6 No answer 3 3 13 140 0 16 42 8 66 100% '8 in. is the most common requirement in this category —9 responses,or 14 percent of the total. "12 in.is the most common requirement in this category —9 responses,or 14 percent of the total. Table 19 SANITARY SEWER Lateral Requirements Minimum Pipe Diameter Developed Developing Freestanding Total Required (inches) Cities Cities Cities Number Percent 5 — 3 1 5 1.5 6 2 8 11 33 7 51 77 9 12 � 1 - 2 3 Depends on system needs — E 1 1.5 No sewer system 1 1 4— 1 6.5 6 16 42 8 66 100% Table 20 SANITARY SEWER Manhole Spacing Minimum Manhole Developed Developing Freestanding Total Spacing(ft.) Cities Cities Cities Number Percent 150250 3 3 4.5 300 350 400 9 10' 2 21 32 450-500 2 23 3 27 11 Depends on system needs — 2 11 1 ` _ 1 1.5 — Varies according to state standards — 1 1 1.5 No sewer 1 1 23 No answer 1 2 1 4 6 16 42 8 66 100% 'In one city,ranges to 400 ft. Table 21 SANITARY SEWER -- U ....4- \ t..._ 1\. ---, Diameter (inches) Cities Cities Developed Developing Freestanding Total 4 Cities Number Percent • 4-6 5 35 8 5 1 2 4q 68%9 1 1 1 6 Depends on system needs 7 11 No sewer — 1 _ 1 1.5 - No answer 1 1 1 1.5 3 3 2 3 — 6 g 16 42 8 66 100% Table 22 SITARY SEWER Required Individual Service toOwner-Occupied Attached Housing? Developed Developing Freestanding Cities Cities CiTotal Yes _ ties Number Percent No 5 35 5 No sewer 10 5 45 B8�� No answer 1 1 2 17 26 1 2 3 1 2 3 16 42 8 66 100% Table 23 WATER SERVICE Water Main Diameter Diameter (inchest Developed v Cities ed Developing Freestanding 2 Cities Cities NumberTotal Percent 6 1 1 7 0 80 5 21 6 34 3/o 12 2 2 1 11 17 Range 5 2 3 Varies,as needed 2 5 g No water service 2 1 2 3 No answer 1 3 3 q 3 4 6 3 4 16 42 •These two cities specified ranges of 4"_12"and 8" 12". 8 66 100% • 23 f7 - o n EXHIBIT A 1. , / • 3o 1 / Go'R.• )-- —.I A q 4\ 60' I I \III O„,„ 16 60'R f/‘1..1 f v, Z 1 o-\ ,� ORIGINAL LOT DIVISION 80' Total Acres 17.6 F N Number of Lots 44 Lots per Acre 2.5 A Minimum LL Frontagerea 11, $0000 7F , ti 60A • Saw (.0 bfW w 0--- -0 1 U I a 5 O 1 80 1 U D Z METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 1 Government Regulations Subcommittee o- L___ Modest Cost Housing Advisory Committee o _ o - P Q } October 1976 32 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL EXHIBIT C GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE MODEST-COST HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE 11,000 Sq. Ft. 7,500 Sq. Ft. Basic Cost Items Lot Size Lot Size Lots per acre 2.5 3.9 Raw land cost,17.6 ac.@$8,000 $140,800 $140,800 Storm sewer area assessment 19,488 19,488 Sanitary sewer lateral assessment (and areal 22,314 22,314 Water lateral assessment 9,242 9,242 Street assessment (exist.border st.) 12,015 12,015 Preliminary plan 550 800 Planning and council meetings 220 220 Boundary survey 550 550 Plat and hard shell 1,370 1,500 Grade staking 1,050 1,500 Staking lot corners 1,575 2,252 Site preparation 36,603 36,603 Connection charges 8,000 8,000 Excavation permit 400 400 Park dedication 14,080 14,080 Street signs 420 500 Trees 1,840 2,700 Street lighting 2,291 2,291 Replace lot corners 2,905 4,357 Extra maintenance -streets and storm sewers 2,673 2,673 TOTAL BASIC COSTS $278,386 $282,285 COST PER LOT: 44 Lots $6,327 69 Lots $4,091 34 M EXHIBIT B 3 3 t 1 - . 1 z N 60' 3 I 60' ' z C ON3// t N .T`w ,� 4/111/1 -'--.4-- , _:‘,__;_, -0,/ / REVISED LOT DIVISION Total Acres 17.6 V 3 Number of Lots 69 Lots per Acre 3.9 Minimum Lot Area 7500 l( Minimum Lot Frontage 60 3 4/11- .Q-' �o o N SAN if1 5 . Z I t 3 0 s ' METROPOLITAN COUNCIL N Government Regulations Subcommittee Modest Cost Housing Advisory Committee M I "' —1 "'— I October 1976 33 • ( - LV r a U.-u V tlI > v ..11'• 2 V OO •=.1. A ;;!4.,' NU ?. O • N.N N .1' N jL'.'-' ; .1. D , . - - N OI • 9 VP . .----7 ,--7'-'1' _ • •...i • ! r �• ►+rr' '+Irrr'. . 4...1..*.+ L.r r r rrr rrr • ; P.P. r p-. a rel r a' • a • 1O O O' as o a' * aaa OOOO aaaaaa * Oa • , as * a a /# (d D • # • 4aa aaas • aaa • a # • as * a I m a! • o • 10a0 70 a ArOo0000.) OA0 •• Oa • r O Ia: • • W i /EAW W W (A A * NNN NNNNNNNNNN • rr • '3a • O! n rN • 1 •A .• O'O) 04 i N 111 UI N I a V V V !CO ON O•IT DT OCOm O.QI D. TM . • 1 V V • • a X n I i V ,.3 1 I . ' o 0 .J L` L .•J CJ op,.... ca a a G !. .'.J G 0 O k..2 J L'. C: C1 O 13 0 laI a a [aaaj alaaal aaa '.aaaaalaaaa 00 as aA N r .+ a...r j r•4 r r r..r •-.-.rr rr-r rr rl+ r r .. s a o 'aaa ', 010 . 0 aa ,a ! laaaa as as a M . .V. V\\ . .- - I\ ... \1.• .\ 1%. o m ! m comm comma comm �mmmmmaimm]DIJDQ] mm m -o N N r.INN NNNN NNN NNNNNNNNNN NN NN N I1 I j I I I h • I i I I I 2 t. I f I I 0 •• r� r I 1 C • • 2 I,I(A r I r r I .1 I r # ( I N w 1 4-' i NN I aNOrI V UI41 W W I W N 04.14 NNNN ar WO-6 r toI NN UI ' 00 I O'Mn V I a0mm0 P' a .1U so.mos U1 ismato mmnm VF Nm to DSO' • • • • !• • • • • r • • • • • Y • '• • • s s • • • • • • • • • • I • • y - •• u : a'O.oID m WUIIPNI 'J W'�W 7200,27N.00Dt7' 0UIa Nda u V 7 aa ' d no V.Iaol UIUI) on1 14auir§ NIDo .30NOOmC•U1 Wm0 oop I ool I I 1 • ( • • I I• • I I I • I • • I1I 1 I I s a CGG sIssa LCL DDDS»D7070a sa s a a ! a n . 000 '. NNNN! 1 mml'1 CCCCCCCCCC 22 1 .4.4 O a R 22 5I N in N rn! I ass -1--1.4 -4-I-• -1 •r -4 00 MV 0 . 0 70'1 2 2 2 0 0 0 01 222 0000000000 MM I 2 ' 1 2 ! n,pan! zzz ! W m nn 0 . C 3 S �Mx x • • • • , comm AAAC)araaf)r) NN 00 ^I M a • • • i 212, mmr'II'lmmmflmm OO 12 V z I 2 2 m m m m 000 2222222222 22 22 - m O 2 �D7070' AP/f)n'. 222 rn 0 I • 7C '222 5555 ' 000 A 7D m AAA222O m1'I -1 , A t C boo ! • . • • , I 777773 >.. ..aD7070a 1 rr 19 En Mmm anon: comm rrrrrrr-rrr• mm a Z -• DZ A 0000. I ! an I O m 0 000 , z;Z 22! 0r000Nfnl/lrnrmin -1-r 2 n S 000 'x -y;-•-4 -•i I 'CCCCCCCCCC 7072 i -'1 • z 222 . 2177221 1 1 M•9'D'DMMMMMM MM77 1 I • • • • I '�mis�59isrmmm O AA � O' m 70 rrrrrrrrrr I r !G)1 a • • i 1 I 1 y i1 I I I I I ,'. M 0 m r.40I mlmmm -1-1-•1 mamrlmmmmo ,, I mL mm -0 M C a I .ID TC: Om0 O! 2272 DDOOOOOOCC rr co 7D ; .4 TI • C 's 'OI C CC C 0070 CMCCCCCCMM 00 CC 0 ,, = A r CCMI MMMN CCC VV 00 r - rlmr: VNTIV. comm - - m ommm orr i . 1 Is , • , 1 1 • r r*4,1 • • • ; rrr • �• • • • 6 • -� • • N , ro 2 m I N 0 2 • IPPV' 2 22! PPP' = 1 ZZZZMMON a 22 a D 70 >' D'mfa. I M sa i ml n M 6m M1-•M M- N(40 ^08.0010.0.44.4M i 2 1 M M C : 2 • 2 CC I 22221 CCC I,2CZ22222 •4.4 1 22 ,-.61.4 V I LAW -.44 1 222 •-1"'1 V V 1-y.4 • -1 44 A ! M • 00 • r • • 1 CA N N �• -0• 1 • • • • • • m, H • M..• I 1 r.r 7. • I 0 0 I to 0 00 .0..1 -V)i .Vf-1 0 .0..I0.70• A yLv _ w w I z A • • .ZI�b A.9I • • • ",A .'9,.7r.'O 70�..1 A I m�'1 A 70 f'i m r'1 m 77 1 m m m m m 1.1 ��Vv mm 9 vImmv1 • 91911'Om m • • 9'C I • I I • • r • I I I r; • a o a I o n o -3 Lpr`7 ooks 0 0 0 O 0 u 0 p a a o b • I-. r 1 r r r I r N r r a a I ••r F• r r '+. h' a 1 i 1 I 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 !I 1 1 1 , A a i I a 000 0000 N a 0 00 a 00 .00 a ' o N; 1 N I W W N NNNN WWW N N N N NN[�N N N(�4I NN WIC 1 •..• (A I WW►• W WW WI V W rW WWr++W r0. WW WN .. I 2 01N 000 0 00 OO,b 0.Al N,.31'3JN00 C' ) *7N 0 ( .4 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1� 1 1 1 1 1 !1 14. 11 / •• '. a I 0.....o+ W r r .. ••`• a s a ur i s s. .1 OI W�1 W . 2 r W I **NN r mm O.pN 00 IVNNI-•-.4Mi- N� N1+ T O 1.0 ry 1 1 I 1L I 1 r Nr c1 p.1- rr r r N rr DD r 1. I • 1 1 1 1 I I !1 1 I 1 I1 I I I 1 1 I II I '1 1 �'' a I .-•rrI W r-I r:►+r' aaaa W.drW W D0a W W • W I ►• . N i r.INN r mm ,-'ON a ayNNIA-4N -• NN ivr Q' I < 1 I I r ' • IW ' I I I i I I I I I I a N I I 1 I I I I I I D I I I I I I N a I • I 1• I • • • 1 • N 0 • • j 1 • 1 I I • { • • • 0 m • 1 I • I • • • O I I I 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 I m i A 1 n 1 In 1 1 n I n l 1-5I 1 to I or N I N • I I N I i N N I f". I I I I I I I j e 1 ; t I ( I I I --I I I a 1_10 I � _ ~Jff- O 1 A I • tI N• O O O J O V t U Y M J • ] V ? J 2- --: 7 1 a ► V IV '.t :t 1 V ?A ►Y 4 N O J l � •N • U N - J '• '7 V O J a U N , / . \. ' v .. _ 0 �, ,� ,. . . ^ V U ', U U UIU N . J • . U, . • -W W W W Y Jr N N J_ V A U . W N p • O V A U . W N -A ! • Y N,r Oct O s a N - 0COA J J a 0 • W NI- J I! • I ilrrrr r1 • .• a i-• • I • rr.. . -. a r • rrrrr • rr6•ror.•+rr (.• 0 .700. O, • I O • 0 • I a•70 • o * O 1• 0 a 0 a r O O a O0 O a OI n .0 0000. OI * ! O • F r OOO • F * . a OF AFO a OOaaa;. a a, Z CO 0 0 a 7' OI a a • 0 • I a 0 a • a * : 71 • 0000 'a • a a a a o ca 00, r1 N OIDtLO' 03' • - • N r .I.vv r ;T r ; CO • NU! JrLri J1 • 00'40.'000 n N N N N'. .+I • 0' r a • N I NN • O. * r * ! ww.w LA CA' ► N N N N N NN2 a ' 2 L3 , • { I 'I 11 bj I 0 � opoovuoD In r-' a oCI 000'OAOOI O' O OOO a O O O O O OAAA \\\\ - \ 5 \\\ I\ \ \\\\\I\\\ rS rr +r .+ r + + Y.. r + r..1+rrrrr •• as a aO a 1O aaa a aaaaa; aa.aaoaa7C \\\\( \ \ \ \,\ \ I\ \ a nom OO' (D A Ila .D :» D ,UD CO CO to a 0: J7 02 Om ma)D CO 13 N N N N i N N r 1 N,N N N I N N NIN N N; N N N N N N IV N I I • ( ! • I i I ! j f. I I a ! ( C '0� •NI I r ( r N N N r -.+ O NW UI w W a a N;�IV: dr;GN 1 r1+ 40 NNNNtrl r N1 •-•(.4 ..- • a G O G, N N( a s 0 0 r r lO til 0�0 m 0 i 00000 �W T 4 Qf 0 m O N • • • • ' • • • • • I• •• • • • • • • • • • • '• • • M • • • • • • • • ,:�Ch ..}.� -a O%J' G 14 0i O ,0 NUI ' P.O. 10 P 0‘CO 0%W la r O%us W W�O -a.1 ✓Ul�Aa' O A 0 CO CA N0-4 00 I NN cm 04000lNi sJ W.n7W W.00NOI i •( I• ;• •• • I * * • 1 ( 1 I ! Annn n 1°. I OOO I 73 I O Omm0OI s sass s s 0000 i z I ;C I 04.4.. 0 I 7o I rnrn rnm1 nnnnnnna ! 11T TT 1•• i ,� i1. 70 Z• 1 O Z In < DO;:OOA 0 AW Da'A O .'Oj • pi rl rl -1 '2 s 0 ( 13;XS 0 000000 ' VI VINN! InI s i ? I � 2r1mrn 1 Im ! Z 22222, $ 1 1 $ 1 '1 1 'i 4 -•I"•.N.•I t ,C 'D i NNwca NI 22222222 ! ri CCCC ' 2 i N<n(n rn A , z VI V o o l C I 1 r1 I I - • • • I N0 I 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ''. O 2 2I M a ! 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Z ! O 17 a a D I 0• i O I 10 1 07©= 2 x • • • • • ' SID I 0 0 0 c1 I a 11 rn rn M I (1Mr1r1: C , I i \ CCC I r'Z 2222 Vi nf)n Fj0 A I f•1 n n n n ! T T t I 0 I a K K K K 0 ) G I I Pt r! ! I C1 02 (I, I .4 I I n, I • I I I ;• I "'1 vs I • I i I ! C I .+ H.+IC rl' I T D 1 1-0 17 N I N N'N N N 00000000, 04 2220'' 0 I 73 C7(1 JOA C CCCCC C CCCCCCC '_ "1 , 00(Am!I G' I O M 000 21 TT:T T V! T TT TT TTi r1 CCC* ^+' '11 : N ' ,-n 'T1 k 71 TTT T T TT-0TT T AI 2 , 73 3732 T I • • . . s rrrrrI rrrrrrrr nnnrnl • 0 i n 1 I o 2 z z zIn (n i 1 ' N 0I r• rt r1 m 111 r1 I m en r1 r1 m rt Pi n 1 n nnnN 2' I rt 1 ICI rlmrt y NVf,f/1NN{ N fnNNNNNNI N r ri r1 D 7t7 I C 70'70 A I 2 I I I n • n' .-I- ,O < i I 'py I. 2 ! i 6 n I a ! '< D n r)n PS I I '9 I 'J • in gil If 0 ., I i r 2 I 2 A: ! I N I I rt • T; I • I 1 I I I I I I • 1 ' .4 to••n j p I O I I„ .1 , ,7 00000 r o O r.O a 17 0 a 1 a M r r Ul r r r r.•h• n • j 5I t I • 1 1 1 1 1 t • 1 • 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 n 0 '000 a N . . a a ai a s a . .. . .. a O w1+.Wr N i W I W 4 N N N N N N N�1 N N N N N C a'1T TUI W .1r r r 0-4•-• rr -•O. rr -rr I Z 0 as r N 1 O - A - Cr! I a a a O O 00 001-100 .y 1 1`• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 • I• 1 1 1 1 1 1 • '1 1 I I .0(JI 4-.0) W ., r r I O 1 41 LA Pa P4 r'Op44h'ea." 2 1.1.440*; •4I O 40r V N ' Nr00m (0r Wr NG I O ✓rrrl NI ., i r1.-•1 1 1 I 1 1 , 1 P. .4 rrl.Nr 0.0* 104 1.• 0.1.4 • 1 .1 1 1 ( 1 1 11. 1 1 1 1 1 000-.0u l + I j r r W I a I a w►+rr 0- +0 Gut-err .+ 0-N CA 4. 0- 1 I 0 r N N No* m0 00- W rr.cOu II I I M 1 . I 2• I I iI a 0 I I I , I I • I ' 1 ( - f'.1") I I ! ( I I I 2 I ( 1 I f , I I ' rt '0 I I I E I I I w a • • • '•a • • 1 ►I . CO o I a• * • s • • I I • C I I 1 1 I I 1 i I $ 1 I'I n n I n A n l I ; ` I I n I I , I 7C N ! y y y 0 1 ' cn 1 i I N I j I 1 I I I 1 t I �,V V„ t ? ?? - - ' -- ' UUUUUUaaa . . . . a . a + WJW : JWWYY NVNV .VN - VJ V ! U•W N r . tP 4 ' V- : A } ' - 5JJ •1 ? J ]WN + JO 7 + T } . .. 0 J : + • : N O J . ,,. , V (V O N i j y N I 4 ga O a .a U a Y. N • to Y J Y u Y N `-'2: Y O NVN N ! > N N.N 0 •. - . - + > J N + O 1 � t N►.I • 000; ♦ .+.+b+r.+7rrr� • ao� 000 * o I. • I N o • Io • I-)•-• • r � I u r r. • IFA • C.0‘...1' * . el I. r +rr� • • .0 .0 •.0I• ••• * - r * r +rl rnNp .+ • 1 0 0 • ;I► +II • wWuwwwawl.+ • J 0 • ' • I 0 0 0 • i• 0 CO IVMd • 00G000000 * 0 U • N •-•••• • I T UI III • r I• ] A 1 ' 4. I2144 0 44 j 0 • • O T L. ,!. 0C) o OI(0� '.0 O Ca 0 0 0 OI 0 I;;> ' U O J.)! O D • 4.0 .0 •'I oo4000 ♦ 4 ♦I ♦ ♦ 0 ♦ ♦ 0 ♦ I "1 IA 1-• �+rr1 1,......) 14 ' r .. rIr r ;I.e. ••• 4. 71 • .0 •• .0 .0A .0.01• .0 AJ • 1 •1 .0 0 \ S. .0\ .0 l 0 % a'% \\\�\I\ \\\ N. ' I m >D OI 0' 0 0 03 CO OD!CCI CO Co rn OD , C1 'A 33 0 OD CO CO 0 I MI MI N IN NN I N N N N NN N N N N j N I N N N N N N N ! i In i j • •• I ! j I• I• i • l = rr I 1 I .+r I I i N I I •..I C 0u 11 I N -4r I I 1 NI . r•r h'.0r r+r 01 .4 C.0 .01 w • UI IA.•r N6 .0 • �)N N•I 0UI -+r'.O- IIIN N i. o d 4.3+66N .o r r 616 0 N1►• U0 U1 NN C1 ►•UI .0 {�•0%•I N N a i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Y«« • • • • • • '`f0• ` • • .4 lJ .0`,0 -4 N 'N.0 G N UI N ' ,a-1 c. 40 u {p..0 h) '.3 N , 40 t�aI CJ. .1s O� i 0 0 0 UI 0 0, 'u m • O 0.0•a 61 r 1+ ooI ' k,f UI IND.0 0. N In prom; Owl o) • • I 1 • 5 i 0 • • • I• 10 • I I4 I I • • 1 1 II I I • i P1 mmm'' oC0 O O 01000[7 L 1 A1, m • C'1 m m I �� 0 mI r mma• ccccccccc c : s, o • ooI r m Veno I 222222222 r - N '0 22 ! • C I 0O. 19 m -r•4-•' 222222222 1+ . 4 ''.., c= � 11 <-c -• 2 22 C1 SR .0D [) 1 NN I •.• i •< A nr•a•' ZZZZZ222A N' til m 1 tii 12 12 , 41 I r 2 22 000 G)G)G)C)G)CI 0I 1 0 I ! 1 "0 MI, I n - 2 I m X000 NNSANNNNNN ' 20 i F4I..1" ' w tiM • 1 O v> AAAI S 2SSZISSS2 l I a! 1 'C AAi C I 22 - PI CCC: 00000a000 m ' ml • mI 1 ! -+ '+ ! i m z ., G)0! s ci'clCccc)c o ci .. wwl o I ziI 1 1'I mmmmmRlmmrl r 1-, i • . • . • • ► r ' I n N NI = I GI as m n 1 m 1 m • a• 01 •r ! •I I I A • Tmi .• mm , i I rvI I ••••I-I ' M < ! I II I I I I I I 1'1 S* .- 'DN• !' 11000NY/)V)NIA '1 ml N m 01 ! m 1 V- I It. I ... C .73 AC. DrCC CCCCC A co, C D C: ! O j .'977 f 7i- 1 -1 C u0- C 013 T VI131313 3 o CI TI c '1 I C-, I 2Z Z 1 = .• m n-0! .,c),7013w;vv1113 m .,, I v '-' 'V v • . ri 13. rrrrrrr • v1 I r -ar ' ; I -4- ; w o • .4 I • 1-4.....N •• I I M • H I - m I Zr+lmmm m m 22 2 titin mmtn I I c) S m m N; m D N o N;VI N N r m 3 v) 2 V) . 2 , G)0 , 0 ; 1. << I M z I < •+ .. •• I P•w M ''' A 2 -, n n --4•1 n i I --1 I I -I '4'0 1 v I ' I I • NN I • O. 0 • 1 • j W I W I ' I I O Fri I °•p• I I I I I I a I z' m A j CI� AI i 13• A A 9 I I I I I II 1 I I I I C'D LZ C: O�: f)O ca 00 30O O O ) O O 0 1 o 0,7 I O Zr h ► .4.4i rr'���......rr $....9..,$....9.., r r r r.. I .• rr m I I I I 1 I • I, 1 1 1 1 1 / I 1 I 1 I 1 11 I r 1 m p0 .0 .0.01 .0 .0.0 .0. .0 .0 .0 .00 .0 i • 01 .0 0 N W LAN! N N N NNN NNW N N N N N I C. W 1 w • C CA 1-.4I wcNII.rr 4..4 r w r W.• CAU)U) N 12 N 00! N=000 0 O O N O N 0 N I 0 01 0 1 -4 1 15 1 1 1 1 • 1. I • • I I ill- I I I I I I I 1 1 I I rr r W .0 co W 0 I 4,4 cm 1 .G 12 UI w r ul •o•u.0 w N "N rI .0 W NNN 00)m T '.. W r NN N rr r 0 I.. u r w 1 r 0 h.•r r •N r • r r r r I r N r. r • I 1 I I I 1 I I 11, I 111 1 I II 1 I I I I I 1 11 1 W 66 r u .0 G•I��•.`` .01/kdrr1. r u .0 W u .0 W W .0 ^° In F- U1►•' ON ry NNF'ODCOpi G• I W r NNI N F .. r I K I I+ II r w l N • P) I. 1 I .0 W I 0iii! I o Co I • I ( I I • I � I I I I I m N I 1 I I I I I I I i j N a I • 13 I i • I • • I 1 f •• I • I • ! D m i ( I • I I ♦ • I I I • I I j 1 I r m 1 at I A 1 I C) ff I I I I N I I I N I : 2 • I N _ N f W i I I y I I I I i • ! l 1 • 1 I I t I J > J J T )O T T T•4!814 • J:•(1 1 4 4 U 4 . > > y a s a >U ' u - ( '3 M " . � ti J O. V O U • Y .N+O 'O a J •3• • ' ' :'\ U . N-8 O 7 J T � a Y - O O O - 1. J v N - O ) ) .a - .( i + O O 7 '! 1. J > , 1 C VU ; ♦U Y 4iJ•' P• ♦ g;N } t. t t•$I y $ YI Uyy • J U V' yy NNN O NIN N N NN •' P V ; U ♦ u. N ; V P V, P V ♦:'J N I I -4I • -i- -• •I rI • ( r • r r •. r * rr-rrr+r • r • rI 1 • ♦ 01 • 0 �• o O • o. • OOOo o u • .O • i O • 1 CI .O •i • •0• •- •! • • `• !• • •I • • OO 41.Oi • • • • • .0 • ! 5 OD N I * NNN • N1 • N I• NN • r • r..4-.0.1-..4r6-6 * r • Or • ' P1 N W • W W W • NI • r • ' Its 0 * W • mm CD CO CO CO to • . * ! 4 • I Cf I -I • N N N • •I • r • UI .o •I .O • 0...r. • C. • I C( • 1 7t A I i I I I •O I I O ?1 0 000 C ca O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 til 0 � I 0 7. A 1 I •• • • • • • • •—••• •• • I• • I .4 VI N. \\\ \' N. N. \ Ni \\,\\\I\\ \ N. r'1 z r, r....). r� r r rl rrrrr 1 `r r •I ••• .0 • • • •! 0r A •0 • A \ r 1 \\\ \, \ \ I\ \ \\\\\�\\ % \ o co I mmnD a m m' aDmmmms >D ITI 1 N ix N'. N �1 N' NNhI �iN. , .2I •, .• , , , F• I • Ir IrrreNN I I i► �0• I I .4 Ti 00MNO.N rr .O I I .1:m QINFJrNNW N . mm -1 3.041,4 O0 -4-4 to NN NN I �.....10 +UI UI W W . - MP UIUI • v • • Y • • • • i • '• • • • • I • • • • • N .J0 0 u ra a .-- o I UI UI .p j0 o m 'com o 0 o J u( MU ( •• UI 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 I INCA •• 00. p•QI O 0000 r4 00 1 I I I I iI I I I I I I 2 9 Sm 2 X I . 6 2a. A! 10000000 M 1•) I n' xts z a rn of s I X70 7D M! POOMw,w00 V. I A C .! . AAn rrn rn �' o I AI xxksss2 7t e A AAA I •'� N 0000000 I•I I IM 1" aav 21 I N. 1• D•Yss» 2 PI O n • • • i w I = w: ZZZZ 22 a I C1 A I O r I r1! O 1.1 C I Z Ir/r M.y r•• -y ,•,A I R Z h O I I C1 (�1 I I I• T>7•A m i A I _ 0 i I I F A -4-1-•-4-1 -• fel I F1 n 2 I r n' 1,40,0.61.48-4I-4.4 O nn 77 ..., X • 0000000 A C) i . ZZZZ ZZ2 1 n I I n ' a 0 I i r 1 I • I I i I I I 0 I I E I I I en m mrrm 01 m IIn H' ccccccc I ''o I -1 I r 7 r .. . o C11 0 C CI r-1-1-4-1-4-4 1{ I .C . A I 1 I o CCC I x C M . ^o s rt a s"O ! a p f..' C• 4.• 1.4w Mr r r' m I I I -,.� .1-4-i .i i l r o 3 N' N m' wHrsM wMs- m r1 . n sas I z I 0 oI mmmmmmm j o I w I () I .-1 L as w' a w I 1 0000000 I C I 2 ..1•�•. I .. I I \\N\\\\ N 7D -• 222 CI i z A I I 0000000 C ►• • I -4-414 I 01 -i b w I > p!D 7►a 3• I I 07 a III • • t 2- 1 • j I �a!lo Aa�A i » - i .• „I m9m1ac91aA I !! ' I m Q•D•'• • I w I i I c'1cAi �aAi�� m I ! I 1 z M )27773 a mm�•Imm m I I • O m 1'1 r1 m I i • I -aa-a a • • • � I • I I I uoln nt o b of orl o >a n 2. I ri I 1 .10• rI .. rI rrorr r r n I 11 ,1 1 I 1 0 1 1 1 ,• 1 0 1 1 1 I 1'7 • • •,# •I • .0 • •Hr•• • • 0 I N NNN I W N N W W k r 1 W W W W C Go WwW Ca r -1-1rJdV 4 W Z I 0 N NN G N 0 00 I C 7 00 - 0 O -'i I u iwr uI u ( 1 1 iI - a•lnww 1 4 Ca! 2 r rrN N ►+ WI NN Nr •• m p4,;., O 1 ..I rrr r1 N I r r r r r r • • I I I I I t 1 1 1 !..4.1,1"1:. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 w I •wr wI w ( •I -I o. sc,•w ►• w ►+ rr+ '% NI 7 r NI NNNNr .. ry r G I r I I N i ( I I V I • M ! I I r' I I 1 •= a w� ... I mi I a • f I 1 1 o a i , ! I • 1 I , 1 I I I I a N I I i I I I II II I I I 2 a I I I I ( i f I I N Y • •• i • I rt • t • I y� • ♦ rn G� • i ; •• ;• I • 1 I • I • • f • i n r1 • i • I r s I ( • rt I M I • I • c� 1 I 1 1 1 1 t 1 '1 I I I 1 I rl A A I A A t A IP I I A A l A 71 1 7C 7C 7t A 7R 7[ 7! N I I N N 0 ' • N. i N I I N I N I H ? 1 • • , ' .0 4A4 ) 1 ♦ 4j(1 ♦ JN3J • JCi plUN^ � OJ u ? U N ) ] VUi 4 UO - + IVi ] , XJ♦ JN+0 • X40 'JN4 ♦ F 4 t. . .., -- • J _ y N'V U J O J ♦i♦ ♦ YI N ♦ O 1 4 4 YI U U N r' O O N 1 N N M N YN N'N N O 9 .4 O .1 • u i N O • i• JI • U ♦ u N_-✓ .\ I I. I ' I I Oa I � • n•r • 1+.-.N • +-•N.. • r. • r • I r • r 0 O qC • 7 1; I I7 0 p • 0 >•- • a •3 0 • 0 • 0 • 0 • I A 41 a I a aa * a • Ii* aaa * ♦ a • • aaa r a • a • ' a • C CO w 14 ‘41 NO • N * it.) ps NN * NNN • NNN aN • NI * , 1%) • A N N r r r r ,a :• co co m * .1 -4 . aa' a' • UI 1 1 • ' • * a I • 4 Ir A n ; �a CO CO i • r '.• �.D r2 Oo O> ♦ -� '.3 • -4 a 'u * r * .o r X n o j C. C u c: ,..1ia a a a 0 IGS O O• 17 C.!4 G►'o O I• p I O ( O a I a a l a I. aaaalga I'a a ' a -I N \ I aa \ \\1 \ - \\\ \\.\ N. - \ I \ t1.1x H N ♦4:(N 1 N 4- IN 1. V V V N V N \ N I (r T• a i a a a' a •. a a a a a a a a a I a x \ \I :••• \\ \\, I . \I .a a m.a: co ' OD 0 ao I !so o0 1 o0 N N NNi N If`' F.i x b .n m N no N NN N N N I N I N N ( V1 j I I I ' ! 1 I I 1 I I 1 i i , I i 1'" I W w i Z I I • r �" 0► 1•• I • la a .+1,♦. O 1-•a%r N+I Qw ( 4 N - 1 a a ►,II N 0• 0 V.1 rLau, or pr ...►. ro•.1Oo 020043 N •0N • as O.O WO d • • I• • • I• • • •• • • • • i• • • • • • 5 • 1 E • •u �•.1.,1 _ N u �u •N% v ALD 0 9.1 0• W.)..a A • • • • • p1 c: J O N1 a 0 Imo: 0.0 a/U1 0•.4 X0 0 040 a 0 0 0 N N 0► t71 I i • �• * • • • I I • • * I• • I I1 I I a 2 I 3 3 i. 1" r t-r r , x x Xe x x 0.1PI n n aDi O ' In Daa1 XXA.'3 I 000 O I 1 I 2• I I 2 2 r r I A I -I .4.4-I ADD I rn rn ri �rXp. I D 4,4411 I n A 33I I P IX 000 1 \\� I r'i rl I SX I 11. I r • I r NN! 17'0'0 333 21'22 f I OO i y I I rlrirn V1NN i 'I I ' 01 D - 0 „o IZZ' S !2M9 .4 <t I 9 O I XD O I IO i A 3. r9 rn to N'N N ZI al41 3 3 N I 00; 222 \\\ V.poZZ Z r- VI j N S rt t ! -1..1: - I• �_1-i-4 • X XC X 2 Z Z F�*ni I • ` �`'1 �t 1 .2 AI O Vf CA N 2 2 2 AAD I .2:. -/ CAH I CC. • 2 22 A1,97O A I72 • bv�I ZZZ o c • I Iri I r'rr1 eac�F' I ca I I K•4 1 I I r+ 1 I V► I I I i • a 0 -4 m r,• Xs r9 r,3 m rn 1 : 17 a• w 1 m rt T1 en I •J I C 9 D O• PI D rrc', 999 0 0 o O o fn D ! CCI 2 I 'C OO"'!. 000 ! CCC a c c rn 3 V) C h H -• I 0.1 G•I 0.C7 T"1-n 1 M H N j rl vv, a a r'I • • • v;�v ! 0 ! • • • • • A r • • 1 N I SSrr11 CA NN i 3 y N a ; 3 3; 3 DAN; r1 In r'i 3 3 2 a 3, 3 C I AAI .A H/•. ; 70723 Da A I •-• I D D • n SN I 4.4 I-4• I 1- Z Z tCC H11.- ~ I m • 1� � .-..r H Z Z Z Z Z n i IAAA I1.-4-1 . 9 I I P - N I PAI C Iw MAP P ! P i 0 -• I -I I III • 3 73 I I 9 3 72 'I 7i i• rn Z I • I • I 2 I I r : I I "7 rn -e I 9 f I I 1 • i • I I • 1 • r I I I r, I r/..! N I p...r I D 17' I r�O'r I J I N •O+ ry 1 �+ 1 I , 1 1 1 : I 11 11 • 1 1 ��1 I { ;1 1 It 1 • a I a a a a Ira as 1 a a'•a as a a a 0 (A 1 4 AI N; CA 1 V N N 4 u 4 N V N u /s) C U w 4(A 0 ICr/ 4 8.. r -r a..I u 4-4 0 N N I 0 ( ID C3 0 orz I I 13 • 1 N 11 - 4 r •4 • 01 ' . ' Ta' I IA.D1•' I .5.. 4. a a 2 I u 1 u N.-I (n I N ttL,�i�r N r 1+ r 1 d N N 0 I r r ITN; r as r.»1 N I I w r' I r'v r OS a' i I I 1 I ' I II j I I ! ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 '• I a a 1 Li I r a4I 1 .• 6, ma,m1 I .0 O I alw.• 0 z : 'I I Cd P..)4-• IA N N•'N I 0.0. 1 ..►• V NI N N ( e ! I I I 1. I I I I a b I is jI I ' 0 • • i I I • i I ! • I • I ! I Co • 0 N ( • ' I I I• I ' 3 • I I I i m i I II , • • 1 *44 I • I i • a -� I • I • ' • • r 0 I * I. I • I I I : I I '1 ' rn Cl Cl G n I A I vg : jt'1 A n Cl N ye N I Vl ' ! H` V1 I N I I y y I I ! I• • UI \ - I I - . _ vN_ •.O ? u . . N �� I<4 r. 4 J •F'T?. [ ?3. ? N? 9J•V#1.1 iuNYU 0 7 t J . t0 0 9 vY '> I4 v Yy9J a -. a -, •, O, "• Y ♦ V - 7 . • ' J J YiU •J 4ii U 014 a •i♦ i •� a • •IW Y MY u Y,Y Y Y Y N. N N.N N 1•I } • Y N i- O 4I D J a,J Y' 0'. O 4 'J •t N V v V •, a > W N'� O •i0 V i 4 • J - O..1.4 a V ? a •�U N I r �• ...•.r 1••..'r....r«+ • I r r • 'V • r • ! r' • i •'• I• I ra' o 'a 0 0 0(3 0 010 0.. '0'O 0 * 0:0 • 00.30000 013 11. 0 • ! o • 0 (• f! 10 a a . ..a •F'4##a a •# • I #'a • ! F!F a a a '• a • • • ' a ,• S b• a * WC.WW WGIGWWGWGIW • I W'G • W WWW W WLAWw a G * 41 • u '• 0 N r • m m m 0 0D 0I0i m m W m m 0 • 0.0 • '• . • G a N la n I u a V J d rl M.1 Iv+r..i.1 d d'd • IF iF a a p'm 0•Q.0. 0. 0'0` '• N * I 0 a Na • * 'n I i ! • I 4 O ! 1 0 c L, J q is 0 C 0 0 0 a G O 430!a 0 o a G I,:+O o IQ'-7 a O n \� 'U.'-'\:,�' - r (r r 1.4a. r F. ! r !s a •j# hi. aa♦ F .aa .a # i s ( 71 .....,% •1.........,.... ...,.. , f' ' o 0 m 7 003301mmmmmm,m f 00 ! m'00000it m:•fl .0 !m +a I m b N N N N N N NiN N N N N N N N 1 N'N N N N N N_N N N N( N M I I I S I • f„; • I` C • Z r 43• 1 140.. u fa. N M•+ N N N N .4 • a h• -1 0.. #UI. ro W 01 W la fa. 01 .5 I N iC•1 N pa - 0.1+ o o H r 01 V ! .0 J UI,0 O N,F • M o a N'a O N,N fO N iul a c j0 N 01!a r G W 01 011 0101 0 • • • • • I• • • v • • • • • '• • • • • • 'a • • • • • • • • • ! • • • • u r .1NW NpOvU1N.OGm,'0 (MT1 .0.0'i.0 .ONic ..,Ir' • #i01• asp I 1....r a# 0 40 ..•.0.D 1 G F N d N G a G IF W m X11 m a a r W W m m'UI• 0..a. N N -4c1' O a 1 • I ( • • • • a 1 ! ( I I O ; 22T.2 Z2.s 52722 22 I 2221211222 • 't r 1 = r _ = LLCt'= CZ=CCt MM -a-•..-•!4-i-1:-• al 12 0 mcomcoammaommalaoaot =200000000 P 0 rl rl m rn m m m rl is rh r9 rtm 00 .000000000 IA m.m.p!p x, I m <p I 4 o • r rrrr rr rrrrrr ! 1 coI I r . rt 3 r rrrrrr rrrrrir » 9MMi�V'ID'' k'1 2 111 ,- 2 2 I ! •'4(44 000000000 I 2 I o 00 .41.4 .4-4.4.4-4.4 .4 '4j f1 O • I 1 22 I NKDNNN �N NNN ►. O - ! rl 2 ( I I 0-0 I I ! I 2 =. I S m . C m .4i.,C f0 I ( - + I C min ••It N • • • I I I Ii f � " rl r f9If'1 ! I I N -i......4.4.4..4-4.4k-41{a�• r rl 2 N N N N f 'fl f•1 .- •-.1 1'1rlrlrlrlr1mmnrlr1r1a•l 00 ` 0m0O0CC,CC I p C -4 CC C',C CC W'tia Tf M �7" OI C rf nnrnrtr rnr'1r rnr1r1mr •.r. ..w.-•w O '9M'�� r+ - -• _ r • b VmmTI V vMMMMIIM Mm MIvcmarrrr I.1 • •. SSSS SS'SSS= SSS • • • :• • • .r►+►rr. I N • 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 T 1,1�n rm N 22222222222212 22 21223CNNNN I Y I 1'1 2 Co nmME4Ii rrrth + /I 1mr � -H wnr I1I i 11t > n M'M •. tl S. 0 M .v 2 I+i I 2Z �H • 2'222N —"...• 1 • r • • 7 104 y • j •.1 n� m mrriiPi 2 9 9+0 • i I I i I 1 I 12 4. . 15nr,aQri'a0E9.3 an OL .rcanr pay'!rnc+ 0 0 n r►•r4. r rr r t• irl r rrrr rr ►.rr pap-. r ~ ~ I n i 11 1 1 ;1 1 / II 1 1 4 a , 1 a 11 1 it 1 r I,i 1 1 1 , 1 a a ' 0 I• •,b F 11 IV a W N J j W W(.4t 4 W W I W W W W W G W N N N N N N N N N r 1 N r JNN NN NNNNNN WG wuuw rr �" •"" a•r 2 rr rr�rrp.ra-"r N N N N N Ntv00 G O N• a-1 r�+ I a a i II 1 1 0 1 1 / 1 1 fa • • 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 Ia 1 a a1 1 1 r • 2 Na a ♦ a •-. r WW .r It a W 0 alau '0 .O �1 uu rrrr NNO WN 0•4'1 lIWN/• W►'' 1...N NhN..fW..1W..P'3 0. r N •a to O r ''-.....�a Al r p.r r r rN 04.00• a a a a ,a 1 I I1 1 1 •. . • 1 CI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a �. a -(ur 140.1. l+rr►a u W .1 ' awh'ma a r'' a "' r� I.0N•+Lf(Nparp.4U(WN►' G1" r NN NN '�vr a N C w I i I 1 w • u+ s ( i I i a Ui • 1 ; f Z ! •• r1) 0 b • I• • 1 • I• i N G7 I • j I • I • I • t • • n 41 I• I • I• a I '• 1 I 1 cs a a a il a 0 n1 I 17 7�1a I i f n ', at 0 ( ! N NI ! a N N o P' ! I I i ! I I I . I I 1 a I • Ipt� Zi ? •pOT }0OTOJ4444•33YJ ) Uf Jy - C • l VOUYWY W k y !V cN t J . J V•• • Y N -O J•I Y Y(U N 1 U U ► O •• . • •. •r 3 j Y W Y1�J y N N ',1 N N ,.� ..,�� IJ P i11 • W •I . J P1• L Y' N + W 'i • JIT __- __. V i '/ i Y NIS O 0' • .4 •:u A Y.' N 2 5I• D, J• • U •t• N �Y l • 1-•1'• * I 1-•I • 1•r 1 • r+M * , r N I * I H 0 •i • N • 1-. I N • j 14• O 0 0 • O • O'7 • .0 V • ! 0 J: * ' '�• P • .- I • I 0 ; 0 'r I n 40 • a a • a • a a l * a s • Ia a I • l a • ► • a: • I a . a • 2 CO * a a • a ► a a I • a a r JO I� i• Ia * .i r Ia a * m N • OO • v • 07 T • Cr a * 1.11 ui • a Ir a0u, • w I N • n ( ✓ -4.1 • Vr 0 Cr 1 ► r r • V V I • CO • U • a I • o I 0 • X k 12 O (i I . O r"c;'C40 a: 0 .. u o 0 I 0 �+ 0 n 0 a a-a a a s a s a aa a a l a a -4 N 776.•77. % �� �14 �� .I 76. I+1... 1 1+ 1+1+ 1..M r IJ .. N; r+ 4 3 a s a a s a s a s 1 a a a a .N 1 \ % \, .. I . \ •. \ . . . 0 In ca O Co uo .n 0s m o t�o1- co, 31 n v NN AlNNN 1 NN N N ', j N; N N I PI I I i I ri 1 j . I I f i • • I� " g -•.o N I N N U r N RA.o u I r W Ca 07 0A r r: u u 717u a TrN NN W11to 6•N +10 0 O . 41 41 I WWI. NN 00 V • • • s • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 • • -4 41 474 ca Oa F3 CA LA aN 0)tT Y.a00 Nb � aW P�+ WW .D.O I' VV VO:.'. r1 ` rp►O co.co .0 a, to to of CA i LA CA0 co CO I . * I. • ;• • • • I • • • 1 I• i I I I roti a 2173 73731 as -o ro -to I s nn I w r•1.• rn m', 71.NI A 0 04 m 1 •• 00 1! P11 22I I -• i 00 0 ••I t. S -4.-• NI QG2 2' H H Z ! sI o -.-y 00I 00 0 N r X T 11 r r x s 0 10 I ri 0f7 ml 1'NI"•1 I O O 0w m 2 I • Z ..4-I AI .273 NN 12 X C CO 1 - 0 1 -11 m a m 0 0 H 0 it l f 0 • • •r I l C C l n r) n n 13C r IA ' 2 M m11 XX R m O N • NN 0j !I x xl rt• ( CO 1 ►• CP a 22 -4-1. 00) I 2 r• m r'1 i O Ci w 1-1 N �I X L7 1C e -I H H 7 • • 22 I if 0• I n N m • T 71 l I I 0 I l j m r^ N m ml co co m N m ('l N N 10 •• 0 o C O OC C O C 0 C C C A -4 CC CGI T7 I C1i c 'fl m -0 13 r mow rr I -0r• v E r r l . • • .• • • • P..M • 14 IS 0 M ►+ 1 I O rt , t mm • N I'1 22 NI 22r'1 t1 rt I 111 CA 2N, 2 N N P1 CAya , aa, I a a V .''0 n M M II M,1 r • C z) 22 f z z 1 2 H .J j 2 1-• I V-1' -1 I -1 n I 2 • • - • •• •. 1 • y ... w a• w a 0 w 0 2 mml mm' mi rn •0 O � 11 I •oI 'n • • • • � • • • • o:^ o o 01 a 00 0 0 0 0 a 1+►. F. 1+r 1-.N r•N r' N 1+ r• n 1 I 1 I I t 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 n a+ • a a a. a s a s a �1 a a a O ' NN N NNI N N NN N 1J N N (M C W tel r u G• r r Ca r' W 41 r r N ( 2 NN 0 N N( 0 O N O N N O o 0 V 11(• 1 ( 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U, i W W r a N a s a P •• 1+ a 2 N� N NW NN 174I N W.ss• Ir NA • 1 ,I • • 1 I 1 1 ( 1 1 1 / 11 I 1 1' WW W (Ai- a (A aa' 0 r• 1'-' a «y N i N N CD N N N N N W •• N 2 r + W I • v r• u I I I I 10 a 0 a n I13 a O I o f ' I • r I 0 a I . Cp 1 s N IM n'J I , c^ a • • I 0 • ( • • • • • VI C) •• . • I • • • • I• • ' I • • I n 1^ • • • I • i • I 1 • • • I • • 0 • 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I1 I I I ( I I m I n I 0 n . n I n I n k+ I n n I C xxt I X x I X 'X :' 71 1 I I N N I N I N I ; N N I re 0 N 1 N `( JtJJ ^+f-S 0�1P• IP• •PI3• 'J J11 i :/ yIUYUA • • ± • j• • • �J U'UW 61 La N1 V I --_^-_- �N/� .1 'Q'/ > ' N _OC. iJP . .WN1O • t .. i U> N- 7 •fJ • ' • . - 00J JT '. .W — 00� . .. . U /N.1N0• iJ1•Y .WN — J0OJ 01. 1W • P J �- �Y g I. J 4!?! G .. a J . ♦ U. N - O:I U W -. a P O N N: P G a ^:n N N a O v P Y ♦ W N - O • P -03 J U N 1,f • F• •I •++ rr«+rarrPA * r * rrr • MA 'r+r • r r � 1+ 'r O p •; O: 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 O a A O CJ a 0 0 0 0 • ay • O!7 O p 0 0 0 O ,• 0 0 Cl '.0 •{I • ♦i a a A • • ♦i4•i * ♦40 er► • • Ao 2 CO N N • r( 0000000000000000000:I • 01• 000' • UI UI M UI • . 1 m N • O • a a 'J • 0+30 O • .O.D In 1 O b •I m r Ir r r-1 r .I'r r r it- r Ir r r r r r I • ! m I• Clr9 UI • ! W W Ic.a W I• ''.0.0 I X h I • ! I I I H I i i I I i 0 I64 i b I I• a a; O I.7 a s�a a s,a a s lO 0 c7 ja,)O a O a aI O T I G G O aI h 0 o I C �.� o A it I O 01. AAAA .IA O A A . . 1 A 0040 A A,A A iA P .4 k/1 , . \ \i\ \\\\\:\\\\\\1\\\\\\I \ \. i\\ \\ ; r1 2 rr ✓ ! a a.. - 1..rrI \\ p..1.41/..14. ( 1+ ✓ • S aA I o• ajAAFA1A 10AAJAA''AA A A A F, A 04001 000 .0 I ;A1 DC \\ I \I \:\ \\\\\:\\\\ \\:,\\\\\\i \ So--\I \\:\ \ \\ a mm 33 9 99902 im!mm Oim,9ma]D99W9 o W W02 j Omm I mm "O Nm • N N N N N N N N:N N N N N NN N N N NN i @ N N N N i .n N N N N i NN I'7 • • • l I I • ! I z ! Wrnor0•iy Y►'�T ►•W 62N1+ •. I r NW UI UI' A 01 r O 0 O.0.CAA N 0%►•.O Oa V 40 14 .4 1 N COr0. A I W 06 M+ OW • 001 N 000OGNNNNA20.001\OrO1+0.W 0 00N2*4' �1 OW r • r-1 • . • • ' a • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . I . • • • • • • • Ulu ,� ,J.: � .W.i .a O.,r a+'•.,4.1.✓m W 0•l A w W 0 LAA 0 N 1 VO 0 00 NUI' OA a OV •00, NOirJo00rr r rpA•d' W 00.10 �N 001%29 90+01260 0100 II 1 ' • •• � l• ( • I I i •i I .. I NW • 0 0000000, 00000000000 I W 000 0000 00 r-1 -4 Ta M U2aaM-02'U22I'U V UMUa 2 222) 2222 CICI us • CC C C C 0 C C C C C C C,C C C C C C I >• 40 2.i I7 a D D 00 X29 AAAAAAAlfAAAAAAAACIAA x x4711 7C XX X j F•11 XX 91 0 Coo ' oop o k-i •C N0 �; 9 1'1mm mmI�� 1 m • f 1''1 r+i A A �� • n l - I I m r9m19 mmmm ��••••y-• 1 0 rvl• 70 • Vf 1 at rrr I 522 r • '� 0 CCG 0000 I 2x ( r 7122 CCCC I `41 ...40. 2 I{ ( P mCOCO I MMMM 1' I 21a 2 2 a7 , I _ i 71 PI m m • • • • i m I 007 N P; �. 1 I ( i aaI 1 I 00 or I I I I X . 1 I CG �D -1 ! i 19 99 I I'• IP C 19 G7 r I I I ( 0 A N •22 1I a�a 2a?IICCICCCCCCCCCCCm 11 O7m0 I 19M00 I 'O +1 rr a m r-rc coca ba -4 0170' 'r2 07 2+1 NM.+H 1.4 I.I F4 i..1 F4 F4 H HO 04 00 GG.11� h I m 00 - ►a•+�Iara.rrrrrrrrrrrrrGl; X 002 I ,-4.4M2rr z 2 • - • • • ! -4 4• .4 a+04 p.4 P1 04 r a-a Ir na a+1+ati• .4 • • r ; 17 U r r 4 a+1 a 0 l 1 1 • 1 -4.4r1 :1-4-1 1.4 H as f • • 1•4.+ 2 3 0 000 O O 04+I 04 a.ar5►40N ar MM 042 z • Z219 rim XX 9 A 7• m 1-1m-1.4mmmmmM29mmmmmm7 A 700 2900 GI GI N .rr 1I 2 =29900i0000000000N►aI �'•a•• I 07•' j a Z2 C: a'I/9.CM r'1-s\,\\\' . 5. \.\\z 0 ;I; •9.-I w I a -1-a r aa.+a9mmlrlmmr9mmlm mm 1 m -4-4 j ZZ I I tit • a Cl; A rrr-rrrrrrrrrr• o • • I i 111 v • m! A!AmAhmrimmmmmm'mmmmm Si , cC I -4 0 P N I O O 0 0 0 0 A A A A el A A Fl A A41 A P I I Q•0! I12 9 "• ' rr as rr-+-1:1-•.4r4-•-•I-1-1-s-•-4 • w 'j M • 0 rr rr• . . . . . . . ;. . • • . a 3,a I z r'1 PI 1 • • • . m mI a s • h ( IV 11• • I I rn-0:rl I I 1 ; ✓M+ 0 m .I a70 .30 - 0.9000191:, 00'2 •'l 01200 O PO :0 a •'0 7 W 1+06160...r r r'.+ 0....0...1+ r a- a- r+►+ r ►+r A I '1 a 1 a 1 1 II $ 1 1 1 1 '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 A .04* I A .. .1 4, 0.0 .1 A A 0 .0 0 NN WI .Oa0W.00WW W W W WW W WWWN W NNN NN N W W C W W r W WaldWrr -4 -4 .4-4-4H-4.11.4.4u N WWr WW r UI UI Z r.a 0 0 O cc CC.p a CD - CD C2 DOa - O O C 0 C a moo NN 0 60 -• 1 '1 1 1111 :1111111111 11 ;141 1 1 :1 4 ✓ 2r u WL4.4WW0a01 . 0. 0 5 .0* Ww6+r0. r 07m Ir r+±rr1+NN NNrNN Nr m W W (ANN WN N N 0 0.20. W r r r r m I •- U I N r r r r r�I+.0 r PK)" N 0. r r • 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 ',1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 I • $ • III , 1 • w r r i r r r r N N N N R N N 1 N✓9 m N ( W NNN I NNNN s N C • i a r• 1 • t I VFAI+ II • I I I a !1 I I, co i I a N • I CA Ca • • i '• !1 I 0• I j. A m 1 • � • • • I r► 0 1 i 1 Ii 1 If I 1 1 I Al 1 N I I 1 I • i : N i ' N N W I I , I I Ii I O •a a I I 1 A _ ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ... .... • _ - OO av . ����-�-JN + as aP00 PYJyyYYY .G • • • ♦ •i • ♦ ♦ ♦ U UUUUNVu N9Ju • 'NNNNOPVPG • WN - . QJa -O 0 aVa - • J N - ,O 0.V• Y •U N + V 0 • V \ ' - + N + f. a U a W - v Q 1 C .I .- - _ _ _ • V ] U • U • • • • • > •• ► • • U V I U U uU NN N N JN'N -' - -•• - - - • .O • J I J '. .V. \W J O ) V • U U N - O. d • A U •i Y p O i.V • U • N,-. O •. ] V • U ♦ N - O • .... .. 1 I l r NI • ' h. I• Nr r«.I.. 1 • r. * • r r • I r r r 0! Oi • 1 0 1a .tea 0 as 00 70-.➢'. • I .2 . -a 000 CD 00 O 0' a 0OI • 00'' n .O a aI • a I• as aaaaa'aaa', • a • Da . aaiaoa • ♦a ; • ia ! S m UI Ut • N • NN I UIUINUI0'UIUI U1 * 0 * 000000000[ • 00r I NN. r1 N M s� • a j• WW W r.l%rW WGW W! • W * .NNN NNNNNNi • NN i * NN n • r c * I O 1r .....1 o O•fN m Q.4•Q\ o I • r r •. (T T m C!`CT 0o T O. a NNi a mo A C I , Ll I I I I 1 I I 12 L. I 0 • k I� 0 0 0 O j 0 LO I v 0 cu 000 C) 0 00044042000 ' G0 0 0 0 1 a a I a as 1 Iaa ♦ a 1000 as aa '' -1 H r, ri •r 0.0. 0.4r0.1 I r va..a.. rr.L-rra-- 1401 s a 01 a 41 .0 10 a a , a a a l a a ; A \ \ \ \\ \\\\\1\ \\' S. I\\\\\\,\ \\ \ \ I \ N. 0 a ' (D ' a OW MmmMmtom CD R• Om ammaa a a O a Mm 'O N NI N NN NNNNN UNNI N NNNONNINNN' NN NN' r9 1 i r I i i I I j I a II I 3 • I C 2 I • .1 rr' ��iiN 00'(~71 a -r N La I 41"4.1 rl ro. N.J.. - 0141 -1 01 - .D 0 IV.1 -466w j.4 a r+T N O y0 0 0 IW. a u o ff r O m m h44.40 • • • i I . • • • • • • • • . • • I. �r • • ♦ •_• • ■ • • • • • • • r W W 042 WU1m 4.44.410044110 .400.141.•+O Wp1aOWNaNlr,]D N f LA UI U1 N rr1 1p'•• II FI(,i44 00 f,o.D m0.00, 100 Np:a.-7r NO NCP 00 0001 I r I * •. •• I• j • • ! •• 1. • I i I I ( I I 1 1 I I 4� � ' "1I 0) I NN nn nnnnnn I I N k7•mm mm NNi owl NN M• MI , r I > p...., 1 1 2 0000000001 11 -1-41 r . r' Pi _ 1.4.1.4• 0-1 -•1 srlrlMnmr r'im Mr, ss , m ri I 2 ii7tiii0I l-t .4 ' I(rrr 00000 .1.. xxl .4 .41 ' s rr 000006001 0300:rDO1 1 NN NNj r1 t t1 00 Mil�1 T7 T I T1 T1 C f•1 C C C C C IC C C I ; 2 r1 A' I CA 00 I rn 0000000NN 04 a4 ' nn ; O 3C1 ! 12 32 NNNNNNNN 14.4.14.44.44.44.0.44.44-4 , 22 ' rr O 'D ' N r hi S SSSSS2 S1 v zazazzzaz nni rim A C 21 , O I o-40. ssssss As , 04 ( 1'1nr'1nfTltnrrin • • 1 A Y n 14 ' s, 1 1 3A x271x7tr7C7C 7tI r Nmmmmmmm14 1 22 2 -i rf 1 00 0 000000 01 I ,440141400' 1414 ; . . .. I PI 141 s 22 TI V 'Ob'9f0 a V' I 22 C MMMMr'1f rir'11 rimnf' M[11'10101I MO 1 7C • i I Arlt MMr1MM1 ( I 'b0C0C000t7 C C C C C C C C C A vvv •ovbvv ! ii I ' 10.0 1 M N 0 11 f'1rn n-.m0000A• f'1 , 000140000 Vl1 COCCI 03021 •'• G . C! a 00 20J20CC'CCr1f O CCCCCCCCC I rr rrI -1 T1 TI 0 CC mso T1mT)tsmI C I V mm V T7vRIT1T7I CD C3 OO r1 'OI 11 HH H CM1, 1313 ' CI H V V hOv'O!'O v V ' 00 ( 0 0 I 2 I r r , • I `v -+rl .rrrrz -V I rrrrrrrri • • • • ' I • A r 0 M M 04 0 1 • I r H H M H H r; I I O i i ri v> r I r �'1 rry r1 m\ r1 r1 rt ri r1 r1 rl rr s 2 I s z I m i CA, 14, • r1 3z 1 F• mm vs T.: z U14m44UU44Um1 ssAsI m I A A A r1 I r^ s 04 M 1 NMI n ! a1 122 , CC' z' 11 .41 w 2 I . 1 .11 1 • I n 11 ..ml "I 1 I • • 1 • • , 1 • • V m PI I 1• I I V) • a, I 1 ( w h 0 w a I 1•I. 60A m• A I as nn' 0 24X:1 , 2 I r n 9 VV • • VV • •I1 r • I • 1 I 1 I 0 0 00 ac '..0,1 - An u �] 00 00 .'� O 00 0 ,"7 s I r i.►• ,..... ......0. rr .. - rr M!:2 rr rr ..p. n 1 i I 11 $ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • I 1 1 1 II 1 1 1 11 1 I 1 1 n .ai a a 11 a a W a00.00000 00 a s 0 N ' N I W NN CA(.4 r.1NN 14.0 . N NNNNN NN NN NN C I r r r G W r W N r W r ,41 W r r r r a•a-. W W W W 2 CI O I 0 NM r c 0 0 0 - 0 0 N - 0 0 D 0 0 001 00 001 .4 I 1 5 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 • ( 1 a r N 11 a W r a r r r 0 u - a W .4 N r r r 0 r a W 2 rUI N Ls N 0.NI r•.INW 0r 0.4.40-.41.4 WN ( am Nr 0 r 1 r r NQ. •.r ,51.00 N 0.0.0.4. 4.0.4.0+ 0.40.4rr I 1 1 II I • I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 t !I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • I • a r N as Wr aa►•rr`72 W ' a W Nrrrr 44 4.4 a W i .. PA NI ' U1 I r Wr+W .1 V WN a :D I NJ0. I � I ea 1 43 • I I r a• u) • I I I I I . 1 r I i ! I I • 1 j Co N I I I I I I I i i I I ! 1 . D I ! * • U. I I •* i+ I I I i i i I a 00'1 I A h I l • i l i I I i i roi { 1 i n n I I I n I n I m �/1 I 22 n I I I 4I N 1 N - �0 I I I j 1 I I - i r V V .I V • 5 4 0 4 0 N T'A U 4 0. 0 4 W W 4 0 4 • > s i J • •� .f U'... n .' J 4 N - � - - 1 U > W,N-O a 1 4 - U - 004 ' U rI • - 0 0 1 .4 * 'J f - i) J '. - 1 1 , - n .' 'J v 1, .� - . . - J O • '.. • J • U N- /. / • S ,Y .1....A J Y I J J • • • • > J • • 'J IA r J J J !• J N + N N N N V • Y N. �� 'O a J P A • . • V, O '11 _ V J Y 1 V P • J N,_, O J V P .J • U. N _ 0 1 0 i V a J !'U V Z1 \ ► , r • N •• b- •� a- • r • .- . r .. • ..r.. • r i .. r 1 N • ry ♦ . • 7 ♦: .,p •I O • 3 • ;� -3 :• 0 0 0 • 0 1 0 I• ci 40 * A • • A ♦1 * A * A • A A • * 3, • I A A 04 I a On * 04 ON • On a a4 • Ln Ln I. coil a u1 ■ to I u 1• m N • to * 1 N i r N ► r••• a - • o * 40,C1 i0 ;40 40.0 • .I ! .4 1• { n • LA • 0.4 :r A * 40 l0 - • 4 a I 43 ♦ 04 04 1• W w I • CO 1 .a '• 2 ci 1 1 , 1 O • � 1 I I I . 0 C.I U Cp OG G1 ra C. I GO0( v 0 y. A 1 A I A A A A l 0 40A A iA A A! ;a. 1 A ! -I y \I I ►•\ \ \\ \ \ �\ 1\\� \ I \ ri x 1 ... r.+ ..1 r I .- 6.o.o. r 1 r s JO t , A Aa A A I 0A ( A A A A , A I 7C n. \ P. \! \1 \ \� ; \ n•\ \ I \. 1 0 J0 CO 0 p'D 'D I .D Im ma. A I o) 'U N. N r .Nj N N N I N N N N rn rn I I , s I Iii N N i C • . I 2 G4 I r 1'• NN: I u1rA r 1 -4 Co CO 6.1v Cod 63 ..11+ 4040! a W�•r ' WN 0 0.• AA r e,a ko O r N • -d 0.o 40 40 !A A 1 d hl.0 ul La Of N h+ O O N I • • • • • • • • • I . • . r • • '. • • • • • s.0 -a N N o u e u of LA' +0 .0 ' WON .4 4-'to 40 ul u o r (JIM Lf1 ul 0� 0 4a 1 00 00 N N I O A.N r' u1 O `� 0.. N ♦ * • III • I • • 1 • I • • • • 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 I N I c c C C K 0 I K C 1 K K I C 1 G I Pi w y ! r1 r1 s1 a I-4 a- 1 ssI z I • I I r' I r 1 en GI r 1 r► i x x r r a- ti 1 ' r ? .I -4 r' 01 M.r rr r r I '1 I • I i - ! s IA no no i 1 a1 I 6'1 0 .C:I I I r<i • C C K I 2 O 2 �' N C m m -4 o ; NU N.-I 1 N 1 N I a > rr •. x I -1-• 22 1 -s o v, DC4444 a r i.Ilh vol c 2 1 n -� I r- N Vf r1 s r1'- • • 1 2 Y r► 1 r1 xx z r-r r tc rn 1 f1 44 4-4 N 0 I 1.' o. m ✓ I I z� rt 70 9 1 2 r1 (1 1 .`. ssI m 1 bo I ; m AAII o r1 1 40 4.4 I I ( a r0 N N O b I r1 -1 ( h1 r7 60 2 N r1 ' a- O C I C C C A O nod o O I C, -0 RI I.1 rl C . C C 2.-1no 1 C N 1 r1 M ' 11 1) N0 M K M H M O .. -4 1 2 ✓ r no r1 no -o aDar Ts ! s • .r N tr • r . • r M • 0 0 fel N 71 CI I rl 1 r1 2 H FA N N 2 0 I2 C N 2 N a cc s! as Al n c .. 1 ' CO CO .. N .... r J-1 p 2 I i VIN Z C .22 N 2 ' •• -• n rl -i CO -r-i I -• ( I • I I AA • N • • • -1 H N M a I I A '0 v 1• N p•1• w 1 O , I , 1 -1 n -1 I 2 1 DO • • A • A A ` rl rl �+1 m In 4 9 1 1 �'9 1 I 1 ',, u O u 0 c1 La 0 i n en O o n s 1 1 .. r A. I .• .- 0. F-.- j 04..r .• 1 r ci { I I '1 1 16:1 1 1 1 1 I1 1 I I 1 ci i I{ A A a 1 .0 .0 0 A ! {0 04:p A A 0 N I N 14i W N W N N N N N 4 C f w ►- f+ 4O w w .Jr 4 N�' u N 2 fI N 0 p r Al 0 N NN O N O .1 I 1 '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 A 1 A i Ww r A A • A w W ' 2 N1 u E- r r UN wN NN •- r 0 I a.l r• M .► N ►• 'V O4 O•r N ►- • I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 11 1 i t I 1 A A 40 U r. W P. III A A A U 1 4 1 .. : N N 1 r[.1 ►- N 'V N N N 1-4 a 4 I U I N ►+ • 1 U In CO I r r I• p Oi r 41. I N 1 I �I_ I I O A I I I 1 f I • 1 1 I ! I : N 1 I2 I Ir. 1 I c i i u1 I • . ♦ • I I • • I a • • • i a a �1 • 1 . • • • . r r r '+ 1 .� 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 m i �4 A I A j ri r7 j I A n n rl I n 71 7t 7c 2 le I 71 i X I r h 1 I W I V/ 0; I N i VI N I N 1 V) I Vf j . i I • '4A_I J NV O•PP1?P:PPPP0YYYYYJYY44t •;VPu - • vA0 . 9V11y �yYyy4NVNNNNNNN• JVP • jV O V P Y •Y N • ' , l i UN W N N N U N N- N 0. 0 0 . O V! P J • U N+ 4. 2 J, !} P Y •I2 113 U' N • OIU U VIU U UIU 0 O T N . U NI- O 0'0 V a Ja ,.y N 01 \Iom r ' P. rr: r+ .rI N r rr r; N Nr r N r; rI Ir 1 • r+ ' N 0 Cal 7' 0 0 0I 0I 0 0I 01 aI 01 •.3I a Uj a O •- 3 n ',O a a • ♦ a I ♦ ♦! a ♦ ♦ ♦ •I a' • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 1 • - a I CO 0 ' ml CO1 m 0 m COi a CoI a1 m; CO mi CO 021 Ie x j • as rI N .. ..I r, r r. r r+ 0 :aI a' .a 0 0i o 01 0 0 ' • UI n 0• U11 a rr N r a •O m I V Or I u a! 4I N r o * UI x I? , I 0 14 0 ca C.1 0 0' o C I 0 u l 0 u 0 0 0 o I o u a vrn a 1 aI 4 ♦ 1 a a a ♦ a s a • ♦ a a a 1 N \ \ \' \ N. . \ N. \ \ \ \ \ \I \ \ N. N. N. r1 2 r N r I Y' N I 1••1 r i ' M r r r I. r V r 1r r 1 r A a, a a' a a a •I 1 ♦j ♦ a a aaI ♦I a a a Mt \' \ \ \ \ \ \I N. N. N. \ \ \ \' \ \I N I 0 m : 00 a ao 0 CO at ao . a• 4 to at 0• o co m w 1 n 'U N' N N, NI N; N N N N N N N N N N N no N �('+tl 1 • I N• f C •'• I 4u I.I-• 0000 1••1.• 4 •• •Da V rr : rr- a , - ♦a r NN '.000 NN 0.0... U1 00 OD a ♦ X04 NN r a ' s UI 0%0o .•r 00 44 rrI 00 00 00 o01 NN 00 4G a a uN rr m • • • • • • • • • 0` •-I ,, 00! • • • • • • • • • • • • ' • • • . Si • • • • • • • .1./ o Ca W 4 .a v u o a •' aa ., ra a v o0 a♦ au :au .1 r r• . a , 0a! 00! coo aa ow 00 ^-a' O GLI Oa 0 0 i O o 0 0 NN 00100 0 0 VI • I * I * * * • • • • • 1 * * * • I * • i I I I � I I a ...' .• ..' S a T 1 0I 0 to ,-sI a a a 0 I a 11. I N C 2 • Z, C I r rl I 0 rl S ii I • r• 1 N 11 I 2 2 r I N \. • •G • _ a a 4 1 A i a To! V :I a \ 41 . O Cl r O NI • a 2 Ni , a r+I rl A i r < 2 01 (. N 0 1 2 T • aI N • a N; a rIr1 In z is C r i r• r-/ -• r O c ' O r a a 2 o m i >c I z a a I w o N .• i a I -. a .• \ ri $ Di N a v t M0 ' 0 Z. ri • .. a �5 0a' .' r C! POI '- 01 ••I r a rl .• O : N z A Z r' - 1I m -• 2 73 N1 r1i 4 O( r r'1 ! -• v n n D O (.1) 1 01 M <' .• -4' N' H a I • C • I r a r1 Cl 2 • 2 1 NI 0 n I N \ m r'1 En - b n 0! 0 \ n r'l A a • o c . , s 'n 43 • I 2� '0 ... j ClPt r+ r r .. N c n I N s ' -n A I t l 2 m0.1O I a A a • PI s! •• a �I • I • '1 a; c r (21 I I Cln-40 i I ri I • • I • (r'1 y n o, v i r'1 "11 ZI 0 N (a co N On rn at 'U 0 0 ' in ,• I Y+ CI a! 0 0• P1 CI ni 01 Cl Cl 0 01 mi a C C 0 -1 I TI Ti 0' C CI '(1 2 c 2 C c' I1 0 Ti v .. C Ti .. y 1 •TI . M .y C ;I O I .•I €l O .. -•I ' {n 'D I .� 2 "'r • 'V . 2 V. 0 mi 0 OI a v! SI • r , v rr a w • I • I ` (r.•'1 I H • N r • • I O Ve P m ! • Ti 1 N' r1 21 21 co N I 22 2 1 0 r1 N N 2 N TiC v a 1.1 to 1 w a. w w a DI ri a c s Cl N O ' 0; Q I M C' M` .q h. V 4 CO r A C fn r - 2: z, mn 2 n Cl 2 2 • H 0 I 2 ra ! ►J A I A r I r! a O -1 0 0 -1 -1 I M n A -4 v 55 : Al 'a • 1 • I Z • .'1 I 0 , 1 �1 I V • • I a N .•1 • r'• Mj wIDI • w, • • is a • v1 I w 0 i I zl AI a , A A CO :I 2 Ti, 1i m! rn m 2 m I i '0I VI V . V 'UI o • • i ! • • 1 . • . • I I I • I I i . I -1 I O :"r .41 O o O 0 0 0, o f 00 a r o u o r rI r. r r , .• r r r rI r r. .. I .. n I I I I I I • 11 I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I n a 1 • 0 a a' 4 401 a • a ♦ • 01 N a a a a O N I 4 G N N I UI N G N 4 G N N G 4 G N N C ►• I 0 I w w u r .O u 0 .0 W w �� r .O r ! w 2 ✓ r O I N N •- P 0 O N - 0 O N N 0 O r 0 N H 1 : I I I I I I 1 1 I I I t • 1 1 1 1 I a 4 G V a, a I c. 4. r r r+1 4 a a c., G ' 4 .• a z ►• G .. u I N I o r N 02 UI r N N 0 r u UI N 0 N ' .' 41 N I ON' O r r a r ON 0• r 0 r• r r 0% • • I 1 11 1 1 Il I 1 1 i 1 • 1 1 t I i 1 , 1 CA l 4 ...it a; a ' O • r r! r W 0 a 1 • 0 Co. G r 1 a .+ .• ! 4 1. 1 N. N: r N Co IP r N N 0 r 4 N N zI I ! O w r 1 , a 0+1 u • a m'. Oaf Ir. ! co! .11 a• O 0' I G! a), ,31 ., w • • a to (A, -1 • I r I v 1 • I 01 r I • r a 1 I I ( I I •c ( I I I I = Co1.1 1 j I I I I m ro I 1 u, a I O ! I n I z HI I jI I 1 I (, r I I i+ � I. ' ' �`� V U J�V 0J PP P P P LU PPP Y Y Y�-Y Y Yy NM Y •Ov • U • � y •O U 1 VU Y yy UNU �•N ., � Au NNNV 0 0 V }Y• U N Z. _ - _ y / -. nfnooiO -" n f n• n �C - NNn n1 nN N nn n =-1.713--4 1.nS`G 6T_N eT • T ; G m OnN 22 nc nS SS.;2_2; cn n cc acnonrrf_rd 1 _ I ! l • Iol • 11 La I ; I i cc 0 4 v,03 I I I I Nric • • . 1 6 C1 1 as d� il ea a . I j n o 17 1 vi h 1 ?• I ul Z r+ r H m m W m 4 c� N .4 • N try 44 .4 4.t ' 4-4 •M M a�-1 r1 :p I .4 .4.4 M It s�+�f}} r .n rt .� d! 1 I 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i' 1 1 1I I' 1 I, 1! F o • V - mm a ma1W.�i M 1f� N N .4 2 .4 :0 M .t.4 n -4 -1- '' • 1f(9 1! .{ M� ^� t 1 1 1 11 1• 1' i 1 1 1 1II 1 / li 1 11 11 1 11 I) 1- 4 r a vi 0 oO .O poOOl -I Cl N f1�1 z N r .-1 M M •4.-.1•4•4 O' fQ N NM trl NryNN M 1r� N O 4F 44 or * M O rr r , r V r r U 1 :1 1 • 1 .t.4 :�.t'e:4 �/.li .•1, ti 1 .� .4 "", 4 h O 4y0U A oc>!a Oc tj - q ., u I I • ul o f •�i a . , i N W • ♦i',r d cd N i W z CD 44O.42 W N M. +) O j W I I N 44 U W 0.4 3t COU 4 W O •z4 N W J W 1 4) C M N = N N H a 9261 N N 6 N 1/)N U N N to W p W p = w \ 444404.0444 Z MW.I .W4 r - W N J /ad y [Zy y • J W �L ...1-a..1-$4 I m J J J tx • O W 5 t W W a a a 2 a't1 tL ti w 0 a a tui. H o i ✓ d, O W O J = C W »a m 7 O 2 O O 0 O a.. U 44 4/ •4 4' O CO N N r C N ce li N N h N N N Z fl co, LL o t-1i I ! I N t7 I W Ce O I r.4 v U fn W aW4 JJJ I a, N W N H 0 +Qat O 24.. N cc U' m a., O: 4 M- m OC C W N N N N NI ►+ J 2 \; 41 •„ et ' V C 14 a L 4 O 4 Q o 1.0.0.0.4. Y, C O w lc J C O W E = W iii Z ec CCC M• r O, r Y. z O z r \ 4 1+ W 4lW W! 4.1 N C N, O 0. id i' W t t i L'L L W V a W S N Id O J T ::: I4t H >Y . r t<'Cp \ .� f/i J !'Mj7,!!4:43, 4 • J W 2 •4 1 d C O W W tI 4 LL W cr• W • H d . . t 0 L K W H W a x •J4, N L 6 r 0. C h to = i 1, ! I j I ! i I , • • • • . • • • •1 • • • • 5 i• * • • I ' C' no 47o NN on nn WeiNN • c• Inlfsino O,lo cin rr •r da cia Wc0 0, 0 10 c,e, c,r, In N rt e, r^ ifs m tr N P 0,0 tT 04 r c ra n t, rl• (IN Oft;a 00 00 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4, • •I • a • • ♦ • • • • • • • • i i C• n o In in o o e0 W N N K)4t m N 1►l p h hi h If71 h 00 00 nn 0r V' nn nn Yj in as cow r h NN .4.4 O'er. I M.4.4.4.40 Oh .1.4 WO WC .4.4 Y0YO tTO, 01M I. .4 r r .4., I .4 00 I 2I • I I . . .7 i N I I I ( , coco l � i i I J •1 l I I l ! i , I j I W N N N N N N N N N�N N N !k{ N NI N N' N N N W at m a1 00. ao m a) • m Cd Coma+ aq ao ea Co ca Cl q j r. r • r • r rrr r • r r�r r r, r r r r Q a .4 .4 H .ti.T.4 .e -• -) .4 .e rn• r r !, r' a r, 000 r r •A r rl r r r I 4Q O C� e7i e-+ a ^+I 0 e., ell o J o t-aIn C� Ci cal ca t, 0 0 Cilh a ( ( j l i j I ! ' ' I j I U Y h ed • O .4 NNN M 00.000'. N Kl h m O• t7 .•t 1 U , 44 .4 •.. N N NNN N , N N N N N N N N N !W M r) N W co ac ¢, a, ea c0 m co (0 { CL' CO CO m as a) m Q' a1 41 CO a), al = �{ r r r r! rrr r I 00000 r:' 4H •1 r 0 r. ON N i e� • e+ n a c, odo o i oac oo aa oe+ c+ M � �• N n,f n • .n O • p - r nO n cIi N N�N N NDn o n Iq • f1 �n n :II Hlr • S f • f ; VThl-r:-.‘ f n nln ; n 'n T r (1 0 _l • 1-N n• •••••... .-ry n• n• ' 2' • c - ono • 2 - ` 2 2.. ` 2' ` 2 2, 2 2' 2 ^ - n 2, 2'. 2 -N _ 2 2 2 2 -N n 7 2-r r. nnrrin Nr.N inn 2, n,s: n i i • ♦ ♦ ♦ • nnnnn •nnnr. 2,�� 2, cd acu2, y2nnn • 1 i i` 1 I r) N I W I ( 1, 61 a a to C. w N al m • r4 • ± CO I I I ( N I 1 er mr • j ? N In N.4 .1.4 [ .1., .• . ./ .4 w .r 1 ..• .y N0 Q1 ' O r1 CT C' CTO I I 1 1 1. 1 1. r I 1 1 1 1 1 '', • .r I .4 .r ..1.r ICS .r. .4.4 .4 o N U N •1..r 0 .i .4.1 .d 0 2 .r I .r ..41.1 0100' el n 17,M O. e 1 1 1 .1 1 1 I t 1 1 1 r o o ••- -4.-1 11 O .'f.i .d j /.nN U1 UI 000 V1 N •,O.Hn W If o ♦ f f 4F, 4 + M r a s f oU1 f..) .• i .4 ( .4..r ..4 N ./ .r .1 N .4 1 4 U I O O :i N n U 11I IA fn ro - ► I ! , i •-. VI • U • •S . I • P- W Q.Q V) V)V) V V) r-.0•1 Vj y W W ! 00 y a+ i •r »! WW W WW I 1 ¢ ! O t31 y y 3 OW I OW I U i Cr I W 11{!....��)1J y y W ! y Vf 1 V V I V) W N I 1 ►i 0< .y N << <0 . 6.1 1 N W J `\ 1% w O I w a 00 10 •+ 00 00 H {�• J 1 H Z 2 J Z 2 Z4 Z., a = i O U. 1 d0. IW IW O WW II W W' Q H 0. N I UU aL'g I¢ y C0 I ¢¢ V1 I' I • I I I , w I I I OW I • • 1 Z1,rZ Id LP • A. I I JJJJJJJJJJJ J YY WW � N i I Z y 1 . U I » W W Ire a ow 1 V1V) oopoo6op0000l I I 1„ I Y w I aa 00 .V1Q ! co W W HHP�F-h-'HF1-•1-HrHIH I Er , U w I I J 2' o a U i!} 1 aa I 1 O I 0 LL W W J < Z ZX 9Z fN 0...420 �O • 01 H _ O 0 H 00 7 O 4 1 0.4 N N O in h P►co co co col 2 0 I 2'0 iU i • I• 4 ! �I ( ; • LI I0 I YY s• > J 22 , Oct 3 00000y O0000q J , YS, I Y Y 1 r. WW .+ { 0 poi I ZZ2Z2 ,22x2221 < C < I V- 01U. U. -1...1 U' I W WO 00 0 O» »» »»3W, 0- O 1 4. V. JJ ,¢ O HF 1 WW t/1 WW4,'ILLLWiWH. WWLL 0 < 0 ». a s r. M w< 1 C¢ 1 h- II . O H rt.-, as > s Z.7 IL1L I 1 I I 1 I II •I •II • • I• • • '• • 1 ocj U)N OCiC) P-00 NN Oo taw 040P. .10 ♦2'!!0 C`00 CY ON0, O 1 ' C, e7 C•Ci C. c.:c... C'a O %0 CO c,r, ..1P. .r 011 O .a.4 Mf N/N e'.des.+00 r,o+1 on { • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •, • r� • • • • • -••I'I • • • •I I O d .0.O 060 O n o .4.4 I V• P O P-..4 0.101.1 P.1 P• N N 1►O.o If!•4'1 O r1 O n rl .1 0.0 a)2,n.D 0' Co o Ot .f.• N.O0 nm,N to •0r IIOIf)rNNei1►YI01 n I I 5.- I .+ W.-40 I.'•.y C�.-4 n t I •) loo N.1 4e ^J W N ; I. 2 • • . of .r 1 N 0 A • 1 I I I I i At I j I i I I I I �, 1 I I I I I I``I I 2,r cc cc m e m m I al r I 2 61 r 4 t+ • r r + + r < I t, . o ea , (7 I2, 2'0 00 O ►� ie o I y ll: I n . r I N N• ' .O .n ti I CO I C`IT I o r, .4 • I i • (,I I n ! M 7 n M 1 n 1 i M n 101 n r r1 mei • _ I ( i N W CO 1 CO I 0)ea, CO CC 110 W /00 W W' 0 • I I CO s i r r , •O; 4. 0 1 0 ♦ r t I r rI • c� c I O O 100 O o O • I U it 4.4i i .pop.,.. 1 .r.r M •4 .4.. 6.-4.-1, • I 1 II I 1 _ t � N rl f 2 • n O •1 2 - N ." • Y U r. 2 ,• 2 12 n • 'n ry N O • 2 - 1. 2 • • •1 2- N n♦ f n n n O • p 1 N N N N ry -N iN N n '^ n N12 A 'I^ A 1'Il • f Y f • ♦ ♦ �• n 212 n�yn {Ini I•f 2i ... L. '�., .. _ _•, L, L, \..' Li _ tai L' I .f CO in c N- w rn c N- N. N- N. N. N- N 0) tb CO CO CO '.J in in LC) Ln to in Ln in in in to Ln o o co a o- o a o- m a-) o 0 O O 0 0 0) N N- O 0 r 0 c-i t� co O O 0 in co co rn 0 O co O 't "s O (D O 0 Co CO 7t t 0 0 ,-i 0 0) 7t (0 N (D 0 N CO CO CO CV I.f) (f) 0) 0 N N in d- N CO N N CO co Cn 0) Co N- in •t- -4 d- 0) • it U) • H 0 a) O (d O 0 o a •r•1 S+ O o 0 o a) (d (d U) H Li C C a) 4-) U) a) a) V/ CO C b O O 4-) a) (d u 14 I i H 0 U 0 a CD U) _ ,H ,H ,- W u s� C C E-+ 3 0 u u H 41 0 0 0E _ _ = CI) 0 z Z a 5-4 H 4-) 0 u (5d 4 Q) r0 u u ' E u L' Cr) r4 L6 a) 0 (n U) 0) 4.1 z� a x 3 14 Cf) 0 H H H OU CO a m E .0 bi) 0 a) U) 4 U) a1 (d u U) U bD E H H b() S: -H by • -H (4-i a) 0 a) 0 5-1 0 0 C H b C > 0 0 (d cd •,-1 a) H 0 aS~ 0 H 0 _ _ = 0 con (d Ca 4 O y O. co a) U) U H H cI) Cl) 06 c,. E 0 0 H H C) u H o2$ (_, o� C/) u X (1) U) [_. H H H U) I C > I I H I 3 H Q) ;.., u u CI) 4-1 0 4-I H ..1 a) •H •H - 5.4 •4-1 Q 0 J u 0 0 0 = _ = aa) a) W) Q) a) a) cd 0 d 0 0 0 (40 a fZ cZ a rz a U) cc o (c) rn (oo H 0 co co H in .t (0 O O 0000 0 Lnd- N N 0 0 N 0 r-1 (boCO< 10• 0 0) c_. CO O O 0000 Ln oto) co 0-) 0 0 00 O d• rn1- N0) O- in z • • • • • • . • • in O dt Co in V D O (0 O N .q N N co V co d• ct. O 0 H O 0) (0 N H N H H 0 H O (D V• C7 no N in in 00 00 0) N. d- 0 N N t o N N N CO r ,sI (0 • . r-1 '' r-1 0) tf? fA CO OO t- N CO N Lo Ct "'1 1- 0) t-• O O O 0000 O 00 0 O 0 0 O O H H H H H H H H H ,H `H H ,H H H '--1 U) O O O 0000 O 00 0 0 0 0 O O U H H H H H H H H H H H H .-1 H H H C • • a) •y CO H H H H H H C') H H H H H H H E u u U in O O O O O O co N- N CO CO CO CO CO O b a) co U) O C b La 0 s Ga C g-4H w O. H F-, H E fs.• H >) t >> (d H H u a) O H H N CO Lf) H H H H H .-1 H H H H N a) Q a) O H 50 d • H [t H H C`') ••:1- O) 6) a) 07 a) 0) 0) 07 H cn C I 3 >•,..-I s H a) H a) (d u C'') H (.0 H H R H H H H H H H H H '"'1 cd C,J00Ci) a5 Al H H N CO Ln H H H H H H H H H H N4-) IIIII �N+ Ln H i• H H C')•Cr 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) `-'1 O H CO H H CO • • • • • • H O in r co co �,, Cf) O N 0 0 0 0 CO H N H O H N CO O aH Q H 0) (.1 0) 0) 0) 0) N H H N N CO N N in Cr) N CO C'O CO CO 0) ... Ct. rn 0) 0) 0) 0) ,) d [t [t dr V V Tr ct V d- CY dt N • • • • • • • • • • • • . • ±;� (o H H H H H H co H -I H H H ,H ,H --1 Ln 0 O 0 O O o co N- N co co co CO 00 O swC/d?II' un a3e �a ' luawaaa2u 2uT1sTxa ano aapun II A q Zg6T uT �uaw/cud ao3 lunowe alquldaooe uu Si 000` 8$ ]u43 `$11313aM uT `13ud Jallell 1.113M anouoo 03 33u1s loaa3Q uoTlod •2u3Suego paau lou saop luawaaa2e aqp 'paaTnbaa sT legl TTe s3 3unowe agl jo lenoaddd • T •oN anTleuaalle puawwooaa I `paPTAoad saoTnaas 3o TanaT aql u3 sa2uugo uaaq seq aaagl asneoag uoTlepuawwooag • 1unowu aaglo awns ao3 TeMauaa agl aleTlo2au 01 33uls loaa3Q • Z '000`8$ le luawaaaae 2uT3sTxa aapun aa3 Maua) • T saAT euaalId •uoTJewaoJu3 anoX ao3 pagoelle s3 aallaT al-13 Pue Z86T a03 000` 8$ 041 03 2u3aaa2u aallaT u AlTO aq1 pugs 01 paaagu )103Q '000` 8$ 1e Z86T 103 aa3 aql aluTlo2auaa 03 21-I3II3M aaaM am Tegl pue sasuaaou3 Juu ao3 pauuuld lou peg X330 age legl wTq pTo3 uag3 I ' Z86T ao3 $uTaapzsuoo aq 3g23w /Clip am saseaaouT Xaeuo3leT3uT Juu „las-33o„ pinoM 1Ta3 ag go3gM sa2uego anoge alp palou aH •13ed caTTuA 3o TazuaN )1o3Q paloeluoo I 'puIw u3 sT43 TTM • suoTleT102au X4J2ual lnogl3M 000`8$ uo aT11as 01 /cal of ale3adoadde pawaas 13 ' suoTT3p -uoo asagl aapun •aoueuTpa0 uoTloadsul apTg Mau ano aapun Zg6T a03 suoTloadsu3 aP3a 3o aagwnu agl 2uJonpaa XIlusoTjTu2Ts aau am 'uoflTppe uT • sasuo lanoo ao3 33e3s a-ed 'aTTeA glTM uoTJeaad000 TeuoT1Tppe pauTelgo at pue luelsuoo pauTewaa sTleo aoTlod Tg6T 2u3anG • sao3naas uo3aoadsu3 2uTpT3nq pue ao3Tod a1aM Tg6T uT ssaoxa u3 paP3noad Su3aq se paTjTluap-t X130 ag3 legl saoTnaas XI-fp oMl aU ' Z86T 103 13e3 'aITun 14m3M suoTleTlo2au u3 Teo2 ano u0141 PPM 000` 8$ Puu ` T86T u3 13e3 'aTlen cq P3ed 3unowe awes aql ` Z86T 103 000` 8$ Pala2Pnq AlTD aq,L suoTleT102aN Tenuuy •XITenuue paluT102au aq aTe3 XaTluA P3ed aa3 aq3 1u111 saP3noad pue saeaX 3o aagwnu paFelsun uu ao3 sung luawaaa2u ami • 130 041 'q 13uJ 'Callen paaapuaa sao3naas ssaoxa 1o3 anTen algeuosuaa u se wns paluT102au ICITenuue uu /Cud of paaa2u 1T3aulunT0A aTe3 XaII A goTWM aapun luawaaa2e uu oluT paaalua 13u3 pure i3T0 ag1 ` suoTleT10 au Xg$$uaT 1alje ` Tg6T uI uoTTonpoa4ul Z86T '` gI I31dd :3Iva quawaaa2v aad Tenuuy aTu3 Xallun :Hg aoJea3s3uTwpy 'LTO 'uosaapud 'N ugor :W02Id 13ouno0 X130 puu aokeW :OZ OW214 cV/1/ RECEIVED r`3 re. iy. ,,. , 4 . :; 1;11 •; . _- APR 141982 / LireV FAMILY AMUSEMENT PAIIA INC. One Valleyfair Drive •Shakopee,MN 55379.612-445-7600 April 14, 1982 Mr. John Anderson City of Shakopee 129 E. 1st Ave. Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear John, As a summary of our negotiations on the annual service contract between Valleyfair-and the City of Shakopee, Valleyfair agrees to pay the City the sum of Eight Thousand Dollars ($8,000) payable May 1 , 1982. If these conditions are agreeable to the City Council , please notify me and a check will be issued immediately. Cordially yours, I Richard L. Kinzel Vice President/General Manager RLK:dt OfEH,,., CITY OF SHAKOPEE /i ID o ; o v 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 A41 (,_ ::' MEMO TO: John K. Anderson/City Adm. FROM: LeRoy Houser/Bldg. Official SUBJECT: Roof Drains , Public Service Bldg. DATE: April 13, 1982 Introduction Attached are three bids for .the installation of the roof drains for the Public Service Building. As you will note Associated is low bidder by $19 .00. My latest inspection of the building revealed roof damage due to contraction and expansion caused by freezing and thawing. Alternatives 1 . Don' t do the project . 2 . Wait until more roof damage occurs . 3 . Do the project now. Recommendation Install the roof drains now. Action Requested Direct staff to enter into an agreement with Associated Mechanical for the installation of four (4) roof drains for the sum of $4,436 . 00 at the Public Service Building. LH;cu /4% S SOC TED / MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS , iNC . le NORTH MARKET SHAKOPE Nit\I 5537Y ; PHUNE 24 , 1932 City of Shakopee Shakopee IT; 55379 Re: Roof drains at Muni cif-,;,al (:4aratie. Dear LeRoy: We are pleased to quote the installation, of four (4' roof drains at the Municipal Garage as per our on site review of the need for roof, drainacie. Work includes v,, installation of drains with necesiry roof work, sco is and insulation of all liorizonta _e spill on surface adjacent to billding. All the above install ..d fo.„°' .the surl of: tour Thousand Four Hundred Thirty Six and 0(,)/1,00 ($4,4J6 .OO) Sincerely, • ASSOCIATED 1,1ECHANICAL , CONTRACTORS, INC. V • , -; James E, Pra(ty -2 , • f , • • • Vice President JEF/gep VV VV *1‘ 1 ' • VV ir$ 4Ifi:/':,4,7, . . ; 41, • „t" ' , t, • - •- - • • • • • • -•> • • • • it O • it FORM 218-3 Available from/,N/lnc.,Groton,Maas.01450 rn jwi al Page No. of Pages // i' j SOUTHWEST PLUMBING & HEATING INC. 1 7606 Erie Avenue CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-0283 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE DATE STREET City of Shakng-P April 1 1982 JOB NAME 129 Past 1st Anne City Garage CITY,STATE and ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION I S}}fi�ga t ARCHIT1 kopeP, �'finneanta_ 55379 DATE OF PLANS 476 Gorman Street JOB PHONE Att: LeRoy t Hi r tiropot3C hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with specifications below, for the sum of: \\ i I • .. . .. -4 — - : 4. ,. 100 dollars ($ 4.455.00 ). Payment to be made as follows: I f 1 All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike Imanner according to standard practices.Any alteration or deviation from specifications be- Authorized low involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders,and will become an Signature extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes,acci- dents or delays beyond our control.Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary Note:This proposal may be l insurance. Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance. withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. 11 We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: • r We propose to supply and install four new 4" rain water leders at the above named address. Bid includes : A. All material as per LeRoy. B. Roof patching i C. Pipe insoliation Not to included: A. Exterior water ways for deverting water from building I B. Permits and inspections Page No. of Pages Proposal STEINS, INC. Plumbing - Heating - Air Conditioning 1 1420 West 3rd Ave. Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone 445-4444 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE DATE City of Shakopee, City Garage April 8, 1982 STREET JOB NAME 500 Gorman Street CITY. STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 ARCHITECT DATE OF PLANS JOB PHONE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: jl Install Roof Drains: 4 - 4 in. Cast Iron Josam Roof Drains All necessary FVC Rain Leaders and Fittings All necessary cutting and patching of concrete All necessary cutting and patching of Roof. $ 4,818.00 Note: No plana or specifications. Inspection of job site with Mr. LeRoy Houser. lf;F IttV111W hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: dollars($ ). Payment to be made as follows: I / All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike ' .� manner according to standard practices.Any alteration or deviation from above specifics- Authorized I/ tions involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders.and will become an Signature - - extra charge over and above the estimate.All agreements contingent upon strikes,accidents or delays beyond our control.Owner to carry fire,tornado and other necessary insurance. Note:This propo r•• be Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance. withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. AItPptMritP rd FrD}iDBuI—The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized Signature to do the work as specified.Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature Date of Acceptance: - <0ofENi4‘o. CITY OF SHAKOPEE 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 /1 MEMO John K. Anderson/City Adm. TO: FROM: LeRoy Houser/Bldg. Official SUBJECT: Library HV/AC system DATE: April 13 , 1982 Introduction I have obtained three bids for replacing the 2nd (and oldest ) heating and air conditioning system. Background The bids obtained are as follows : Steins , Inc . $3 , 550 . 00 Associated $3 , 375 .00 Hoov-Aire , Inc . $3 ,825 .00 All bid the same type units . Steins was 25 ,000 BTU less then the other two bids . The project is budgeted , Associated is low bidder and the bid is lower then what was budgeted for. The $4,000 was incorrectly identified as City Hall . Alternatives Don' t replace the unit . Recommendation Enter into an agreement with Associated. Action Requested Direct staff to enter into an agreement with Associated Mechanical for $3, 375.00 to replace the heating and air conditioning system at the Library. LH: cu —CONTRACT— Steins, Inc. 1420 W. 3rd Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Telephone 445-4444 April 6 82 19 CITY of SHAKOPEE SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA (Purchaser) (Address) We propose to furnish and install in the _. CITY LIBRARY BUILDING situated at 235 Lewis St. Shakopee, Minnesota the following material: 1. - BRYANT 58580 -148 Package Heating and Cooling Roof top Unit , With 118000 A.T.U. Cooling and 125000 B.T.U. Heating. All necessary sheet metal duct and fittings All necessary electrical airing Existing Roof top Unit to be removed by Steins Inc. $ 3550.00 / or%r‘ tat.rt j , e 4'1, • • MECHANICAL T: / 100 N()fah MPi - tiiAXOPFE, March 24 , 1982 City of Shz.kope.., 129 E. 1st Ave. Shakopee , MN 5337 Dear LeRoy: We propose to replar', front unit. of the Shakopee Library as follows : Remove : Bryant MoOel F 48-5795 -460 to ro fio ,„ Carrier Model 4 48GL-049 230-1-00 48,000 BTU Cooling 150,000 BTU heating Includes: She.otmetal fron unit to exlstinci iuct Cas 211., exiFtin .-/ns1in &lee tr'Leal wrii Boom truck All of the love for the s in o Three 'ithe,,3B,---fhcl Thrce Huidre Eeventy-rive arla n')/30 ) ($ 137:) . 00) . Sincerely, ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. Joseph M. Sand, Jr. President JiviS/gec • lrei 10° HOOV—AIRE, INC. 6840 Shingle Creek F'kwy Minneapolis,Minnesota 55430 April 6 , 1982 (612) 566-0610 City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Mn. 55379 Gentlemen: ewe are pleased to quote the replacement of the Bryant 4 ton heating and cooling unit at the Shakopee Library with a Carrier Model 48GL048 combination heating and cooling unit complete with necessary ductwork, gas piping, and electric wiring for the sum of $3 ,825.00. The disposal of the existing unit is by others. Sincerely, i Ronald F. Kocher RFK/pp HEATING — VENTILATING — AIR CONDITIONING INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL MEMO TO: John K . Anderson City Administrator FROM : Ray G. Ruuska Engineering Coordinator RE : VIP Sanitary Sewer Interceptor Project No. 81-1 DATE: April 16, 1982 Introduction : Attached is Partial Estimate No. 10 for the above project for consideration and approval. Background : The purpose of this estimate is to complete payment for Item No. 59, "Clear and Grub". A subcontractor cleared the trees early last year but only recently disposed of them. It would create an undu hardship for the contractor if payment was delayed until the regular billing cycle, therefore, it is recommended that the Partial Estimate Voucher No. 10 be approved. Action Requested : Approve Partial Estaimte Voucher No. 10, in the amount of $3, 084.40 to Arcon Construction Co. , Inc. , 903 East Forest, P. O. Box 57, Mora, MN 55051 for the VIP Sanitary Sewer Interceptor Project No. 81- 1. RR/jiw Attachment PARTIAL ESTIMATE VOUCHER Contract No. 8171 Partial Estimate Voucher No. 10 Period Ending: March 31, 1982 T3: Contractor Arcon Construction Company, Inc. Address 903 East F9t est, P. 0. Box 57, Mora; Minnesota 55051 Project Description VIP Sanitary Sewer Interceptor 1 . Original Contract Amount $ 617,823.65 2. Change Order No. 1 Thru No. $ ' 2,000.00 (deduct) 3. Total Funds Encumbered $ 615,823.65 Value of Work Completed $ 564,950.60 Value of Work Remaining 0 Percent Retainage $ -0- $ 50,873.05 6. Previous Payments $ 561,866.20 Deductions or Charges $ --0- Percent Complete 92 percent Total $ 561 .866.20 1'dyment Due (Line I+ - Line 8) $ 3,084.40 CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT (I, We) hereby agree that the quantity and value of work shown herein is a fair e timate of the work completed to date. CONTRACTOR: TITLE: DATE: ;JPROVED - CITY OF SHAKOPEE City Engineer Date City Administrator Date • PROPOSAL SCHEDULE 91?7- PROJECT NAME VIP Interceptor Sanitary sewer r] n• �reh 3/� I982. -- --- ---- -------- OWNER Pt_r�0� E TYPE OF WORK PHOJ. NO. __81-1 SHEET 1 2 OF ITEM CONTRACT ITEM UNIT UNIT ___CONTRACT ria PRICE QUANTITY AMOUNT 14" Poly lined DIP 0-8' L.F. $ 33.40 85 $ 2,839.00 O -0- . 14" Poly lined DIP 8-10' , L.F. 33.40 18o 6,012.00 gii< 2ew560 14" Poly lined DIP 10-12" L.F. 36.50 195 7,1.17.50__ /0 7665,00 4 14" Poly lined DIP 12-14' L.F. 36.50 90 ? 285.00 2 27 82 c. 50 14" Poly lined DIP 14-15' L.F. 41 .7o 7 3,127.50 31 31,6940 14" Poly lined DIP 36-1-8' 1 .P. 41 .70 ' ; 417.00 .2 'f / DOD. g0 14" Poly lined DIP 18-20' L.F. 45.90 ,( 1 ,836.00 -o- - 0- 14" Poly lined DIP 20-22' L.F. 45.90 1 ,606.50 -0- --C, - 15" Pipe Sewer 12-14 ' L.F. 2,:. 10 8,177.00 Z 38 5.259, 80 15" Pipe Sewer 14-16' L.F. 22.10 1t 3,978.00 / 9is ,I287. 'f- 15" Pipe Sewer 16-18' L.F. 23.80 120 2,856.00 /30 3o9'f 00 15" Pipe Sewer 18-20' L.F. 23.80 25 595.00 _ 82. / 95/ .60 18" Pipe Sewer 8-10' L.F. 20.40 115 2,346.00_ s /63,20 . 18" Pipe Sewer 10-12' L.1'. 20.40 1110 23,256.00 /212 ;i0:2J/%86 18" Pipe Sewer 12-14 ' L.c . 22.50 550 12,375.00 5/'L ii) 5-45.00 18" Pipe Sewer 14-16' L.F. 22.x,0 3` 787.50 21" Pipe Sewer 10-12' L.F. 21 .10 19 4 ,009.00 %+f b 3 pg0, 60 21" Pipe Sewer 12-14 ' L.F. 21 . 10 41 '. 8,756.50 32/ G773,/0 • 21" Pipe Sewer 14-16' L.F. 23.60 119n 28,084.00 130 31 /28 .J/ 21" Pipe Sewer 16'-18' L.F. 23.60 290 6,844.00 32c '7(,,70,00 : 21" Pipe Sewer 18-20' L.F. 29.05 275 7,988.75 255 '7i.07, 75 21" Pipe Sewer 20-22' L.F. 29.05 290 8,424.50 2g5. 6 2 79.25 21" Pipe Sewer 22-24' L.F. 34.25 35 1 ,198.75 /{F 9.79, 50 24" Pipe Sewer 0-8' L.F. 21.80 .1:.'14 5 27,141.00 1570 341224,6e 24" Pipe Sewer 8-10' L.F. 21.80 395 8,611.00 4'1. i 39 5, 2c 24" Pipe Sewer 10-12' L.F. 25.70 1+5 1,156.50 _ '93 2 390. 10 24" Pipe Sewer 12-14' L.F. 25.70 1+05 10,408.50 369 9"$3,30 24 Pipe Sewer 14-16 L.F. 27.80 400 11 ,120.00 253 76E, * • 24" Pipe Sewer 16-18' L.F. 34.70 105 3,643.50 122 le2)7 'to 24" Pipe Sewer 18-20' L.F. 41.60 90 3,744.00 1 * •}574•, stG 24" Pipe Sewer 20-22' L.F. 47.00 95 4,465.00 102 ' µ79h. 00 24" Pipe Sewer 22-24 ' L.F. 50.60 110 5,566.00 22‘ I/1 N'35. 60 • 24" Pipe Sewer 24-26' L.F. 54 .40 150 8,1.6J.00 377 20, 5'08•$0 • I. 24" Pipe Sewer 26-28' L.F. 58.60 925 54,205.00 6/9 3 273. 4D 21 Pipe Sewer 0-8' L.F. 25.40 2785 70,739.00 2797 711 0'1'3. 80 27" Pipe Sewer 8-10' L.F. 25.40 85 2,159.00 59 1, 498./00 Reconstruct Manhole Ea. 2500.00 . 1 2,500.00 -0- - 0- 48" O- 48" Dia. Manhole Ea. 800.00 ;1 16,800.00 23 /8, 'f00. 00 54" Dia. Manhole Ea. 1400.00 1 4,200.00 3 Zoo, co 60" Dia. Manhole Ea. 1725.00 5 8,625.00 5 53625- 0e 48" Dia. Excess Manhole Depth 60.00 l ' 4.H 9,240.00 172 101 320.00 18" Dia. Drop Section La. 2200.00 1 2,200.00 . / 2. 20000 8" Dia. Drop Section Ea. 1550.00 1 1,550.00 / / ,550 00 • 8" Excess Drop L.F. 40.00 9 360.00 9 36,000 18" 7i degree Bends ' Ea. 155.00 1+ 620.00 sit /40040 15" 711 degree Bends Ea. 150.00 300.00 2 300, 00 14" C.I. 1/8 Bends Ea. 450.00 1 450.00 ••-O- -0- 14" C.I. Tee & tapped f1anPr,e Pa. 1000.00 1 1 ,000.00 1 / OOaOO 2" Cate Valve & plug l�;n. 125.00 I 125.00 / I 125Gb hock Excavation C.Y. 10.00 9,`.00 98,000.00 7133 I 71, 33,Q 00 i Granular Mat'l for Stab. Ton 6'.00 51u 300.00 -0- --0_ Mid,/ P4 a,e I - µ7o,52 8.40 r PROPOSAL SCHEDULE 0e4-/ PROJECT NAME VIP Interceptor Sanitary l _ -- _ .-. _S -- ewer OWNER rcojaf, _g...„4:24, 4 31 /1V2- TYPE OF WORK _ -`_ PItOJ. NO. 1-1 8SHEET 2 OF 2 ITEM CONTRACT ITEM TUNIT UNIT NO. CONTRACT PRICE QUANTITY' AMOUNT Borrow Material C.Y. $ 2. 50 5000 $12,500.00 ZA1- 9 6,2200e 8" Stub & plug Ea. 50.00 29 1,450.00 2.s / y-00, OG 4 10" Stub and plug Ea. 65.00 3 195.00 44 26000 ' 12" Stub and plug Ea. 80.00 2 160.00 2 /(o0 00 15" Stub and plug Ea. 100.00 4 400.00 g 400,, gC 1.8" Stub and plug Ea. 110.00 1 110.00 / //0, 0o 21" Stub and plug Ea. 120.00 2 240.00 2 290, 00 Clear and Grub L.F. 3.2(1 0035 6,192.00 /`135 G /17.00 . 0 Sodding S.Y. 1.2.5 5000 6,250.00 2q/,t 3 00, 5e) c,: Seeding S.Y. .05 29,500 1,475.00 -p_ _0- Seed and Mulch S.Y. .10 13,155 1,315.50 38, 2Y, 3?24-‘4, Fertilizer Analysis 10-10- 0 Tun 250.00 2.63 657.50 2,5 102500 4" Service Conn. Ea. 100.00 5 500.00 3 3 oo,co 6" Service Conn. IOi. 100.00 5 '00.00 -o- -o- PavemPnt Restoration (4;,h Ave. ) S.Y . 11 .25 18',,o 8,972.50 6,e 319. 80 Pavement Restoration (CL 16) S.Y. 1.4.90 11(, 1,728.40 /2.5 / S62, 5D • Pavement Restoration (Hauer Tr. ) S.Y. 4.55 1005 4,572.75 SEE 13E4oc.4) ,, , Aggregate Driveway Rest. S.Y. 3.00 100 300.00 .3 /1/ oo Shoulder Restoration S.Y. 3.00 720 2,160.00 #.3p / 350, DD ] Straw Bale Erosion Control Ea. 4.00 60 240.00 342. /.20,no ' Meter Station No. 1 L.S. 23,250.00 1 23,250.00 ? % 20 ?25,Oo Meter Stqtion No. 2 L.S. 25,3000)0 1 25,300.0, Soso Z2� 170, oio Special Structure No. 1 L.S. 11 ,150.0o 1 1.1,150.0. / //( / 5'0,00 • . Special Structure No. 2 L.S. . • 4 ,900.0 ► 1 4 ,900.0• / 'tfi0o, Do TOTAL LIP ALL ITEMS $617,823.6' 1 ve ,,,ii`� t e$tovaf ll,, ,, ret ', S, y 9 55 //itg 51-2 3, �-o S. y, 3.'to geo l 2927. Ito To 40 l Pwpe 2 9'1 p,L22 247 • To -b+I P4e2 e I /-7O,SXs HO To-14 9y J't 22 20 T4.1 / 54't ,950 .60 I