Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/15/1981 1 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Non Agenda Informational Items DATE: September 10, 1981 1 . The Chamber of Commerce and the downtown businessmen have not decided on a contribution to the downtown redevelopment because the Downtown Committee has decided to do several minor improvements as an initial step. The Downtown Committee will be reporting to Council in the near future. 2. At the request of Council we checked on the dumping behind Taylor Rental. The problem is considerable. Jim Karkanen will sign the area and the police will patrol it more heavily; however, control of the dumping will be difficult. If we can catch someone maybe the word will get out. Don Steger says they are dumping in a large area along the river and that there are numerous roads into it. 3. The Request for Proposals for Cable bids were issued the week of September 7, 1981. 4. Attached is the monthly Financial Report for the month ending August 31, 1981. 5. Attached is the Building Inspector's Report for the month ending August 31, 1981. 6. Attached is an invitation to the League Regional Meeting to be held here in Shakopee. Judy would like you to confirm your attendance so please call her. 7. Attached is a copy of Met Council's staff response to our testimony regarding the Jackson sanitary sewer alternative that was set aside when Met Council staff recommended expansion of the Chaska Wastewater Treatment Plant. 8. Attached are the Policy Guidelines adopted by the seniors for the Shakopee Senior Multipurpose Center. Jeanne Andre participated in the meeting. 9. Attached is a letter from Rod Krass to our State Representatives regarding the fiscal disparaties. 10. Attached is a thank you letter from St. Francis Hospital. 11 . Attached is a letter from Bill Frenzel responding to our concerns about IRB's. 12. Attached are the minutes of the September 3, 1981 Ad Hoc Downtown Committee Meeting. 13. Attached are the August 13, 1981 Board of Adjustment and Appeals minutes. 14. Attached are the August 13, 1981 Planning Commission minutes. 15. Attached is a letter from Dave Durenberger to Jeanne Andre regarding his position on municipally owned cable systems. Non Agenda Informational Items Page Two September 10, 1981 16. Attached is a memo from Don Steger regarding Planning Commission actions of September 10, 1981 . JKA/jms ///L,,, iy UIU(U U'U pp • I.. •I• • •: • •• • yy U J, W ,U U 1., 41 Y N'N N ! Y N1N N • 0 Vlp 0 •IU N -. ? 0, •• '(a N�- G •I O_ olio i o •• W' N - 01:0 3 1 .3, •J > Y N - O 0 01 v 0 u 4. N+- O O! p V O'p ► N N _ O i i i j W t.4,..• u G.LA 4 • Co I.e .,(w W 4 u G W 4:(9 'tet VL .d 4 CA • [.1 4 4 W (4 CA w w 1,4 w 4 1c*4/44/4 • W u(4 4 11 't'. JI0N Ln Ln 0 a • 414.444W 44ILA 4a4.0u4L44.4 • r Hrrr.-.r .•rr+ • 1 ) .,!0 ) IOC D r Ss,.J '.) 'n{Or • (T JI •4'a .a 4N N NN 4"J 0 '.' ') * .. u u LA W u'44r Nrr • N N r.. ,7.p ;D V S L. • ,3 '7 •3•N rc:M Nr'J ..0,d al 415 • f• v Z v!T J10. GA NI N 1U1 U N.. 3 ..)0' ( n _ 1 I 1 I I b M,^)L. a <In.. .y U)C7 n 17 v) D• N "0 IU n 7 z 2 A r M s N,r•1 V L�Z v ..3I'0 J Z Oar -. �1 0 U] 74 �C l 2 2 2 O alb 2 'o M A O C, -,1-•O -4O-r^1• U C, 'l «. !•. -r f i'1,'1 I'1 r C IO 0.r,rr^1!-. a .-t C1 C .f1 i2 tO .n 7 O t7 x r k'D c D c In. C r a -.n are• ..rf -s' -0 n n nam e r hln r-. o c+(n p a to o ac m r > z '<.-' -• • .-.. .-.r r a' z n Ez z.. -. a a -..-.-. a. (1.-.c 'n m m� m r Y r r n fLa o a c ,'1 n. o . . < 2 A 2mmr - on-'Inr'nr -'fnm 1 mrnrn 2 • m -. A 0a r • O. 0 'n > ,'1 O C)m(*+ -- < .-. T110<m I m 41 . 1-,m-*1 0 -.a -02•.....» -.-. 1 rx r9 r r, 7, o .V m < N T n O -< 1 Z r'1 ) a 0M 1 '1 43 m 2 W ,'1 Z i> n = 004 2-4m IN m M >.m('L - a ..) 1. C ') 37 U) e r ar-1 :9 O :l - I 0) .00.�f7 a n 43 C p m C-.' n r m O a C 244.2)2 0•..7. x-.3Q -r ca-.< C n aAD • x . D 42'-02 a Z'a- 4r 2. 710 m.. .-• '1 < 9. 'l N m2Cb a'2 A D • a>• 3 4 '12 a2 D 2N r • 4 1.1 D.. a.91'1 N.. Din (mm *40 2 G)mr GC. -.1 C3-4vt. • .- a.-.-I CII mu) 32 -. < mm m7r2U)49 3s I T)a a 'T1 7M - 2 m D n ..2N) A -. m it C••T 1'1 v) 9 A r .)i'1M S)m z a -.O -.r 7c 110)7! < n :• .-+ 2 a '1.'2.. a 0) ,1 0)2 1 A n'.:3;-. N rNV) A< -.n .4 O M I.1.0 f' -4 r a 2 • •,, 02 21 N 3 s: CIA ......n (N F')a. m .. Cl) C QM '0 A2 t , 20.4 -4 O C) -4 2 2 - 313 -t-.m 22 N -A-4P1 A 2C. 19 C-J m .. 'f I1 9 O• a • o v) i1 .r a 0 m u)U)2 r N C) .-. D a A 2 m .4 in C n .. . A o -. 2 -4 •• m I'1-I A N .. 1 1'1:< La 1 0 4 •+1 .'1 A D O b D a -4 N AA. 3 ) m n V)r lnmm 2 L'1 In 1 7C> .. 2'a -4 23 .. .n m r. N -. (4!'. N 91 m 0 -42 m ..••. -4 2 n -4 - -4 0 N y .. S. (444 m _ •-. N N 0 IM • 3 S7 C �m 7 :C r1 n C a r rr N • r a O .0 .) WO r r 9 a' A • • • • a a . m rUI u .4 V 0 0 • N N rN•• 0'0 1'1 NUI .1 W NM O .D 0' CON-443 , NO e-•d *40 4 W ,342 ...A-4 .4 -4 N ON r • N N - •J O' NW O ca •.0 O O • • In C • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • i-.-. 01 .. iI: a) 'f ..:/6 4.1 CL. 13( 7 u J t �. ^).1 a 4 u - .3 C. CD UO J O U J O O -. u O ..... q m J V. -. ..) 0 (J ()(4 -) : 4 .4 " 6 u U u ..N 3 u • Ja.:JUO OO )oO343 .0CN N rz a O C I z m I ( I -. !, 1 C I 1D D 1 A ('1 1 ( ( e 0 3 i I ; E I 1? I ( to I � I I �i'4 I € 'D n 4 1.- an D' 4H r j u • r • -1 u r N UI u 0,-•0%) v N 4 • N N -4 w iUI lT p ) I4 -- O 1,409 3 1-.6-• O 14,00' • 0)O 4 N 4 O W • • • • • j•- • •- . . . . . • • • • • • •• • a r • (AC)k: Li 0 lNN W O u 0 0•L.)N 9 N o.a .1 LR o 0 • U V V W W• a 9 W N O N i9 •')t7.....1 >e.)1-3 r A '00 0 0 .0 UI( '. 0.-lot -1 C)1 - 06 O6'-3 '3'3 O CO C7N 'a 4 .0 m '0 L ILO o 0 P.0 • • O O O,7 9 O-N n o 0 0 O O - O o (3(3 o o O o O o o v O -1 < • • • 4 • ;• • •< • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •- s • • • - • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .m 1 C_.Io 0 •3 1.3'3 o C 0 0 0•7 O ICI 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 O 0000 p 'a O O O O o O +2 O O O 004= 0 !7 J..1 I . U C'.13 >3 C c 00-2 "7 -1 - 0000 -,000 O 0c30 , 00 000000000 O 0,300 C VI i f m .11 -, v r 011 r .a1 .D • IN 0 p a r O W D '.D 4.4-44.0.,. N r • r IN O O 4.0 4 4 D r•.S vl u N .0 •4104- 4 U) W 4-.N•N •Nk.•r.1 'a N W Y•UI W N U1 n 'n-41c- .::I Co N I •UI -' . , . W I•N • • u N hD r N O 9 4 W O W.D Ln U1 :a 1 N .0 t0 ic: 3! W (W •L Ut.0 9 n r 'O Ln Cl ..co 0'4 N 41 P.-t• O 0'•6 CO 0 G -4 -( n • • • • • • • • • • • • • • �• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1•- • • • • • • • • -40 O •0'l0 0 0 Io O 4•. O ioO 0 U1 01 W W o a o 0 o a o• r O o c1 U1 N r r.D 0 0 0 o 0 o p 0' o o IO 0' 'C 71 { r .O l.3 '3.o IO n I-( ,> > a(3(1 0' •1.) 3'0 n a o.a o 0' 9 O O O o o 4-UI N o 3 a J.o O o .O O<3I-' '0 la I rogo D I W UI r r 1 W I• c O •4(.• N0 N r!tJl .'• N 0 N 9 m 9 N3 C' N U1 A 0 ha,.. ') • u '. 1.1 N • O N O O o 'r • • • • I.• • • • • . • • I • . • • a .. • • • �< OrU1 Ut O :r ..1 • 0010 UI rIV r9I N'01•UI 0 NrIUI0 r0.:9.rN NO O Co O 'a [ a'V�C.. ,, ',O 'N 0'I O O jUI J.r N 4 n( o'9 0 13 0' a N'0 I•o d 10 N U1 O r 4 _ .4 4 W O: 4 ,'9 'p NC. "74 A O r.Ia P.O .V'•r 43 ,..:.. .-}0 5.' '0 ' A4 NN417N A • • Ci -- _. .O O .11 •4 • • • • • • • ,• • • • • • • • . • • • • • '• • • • {• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • > •0%10 C- 6 6 O 03 O 10 C)O I0 4 0 0' 0 o .)O 0)•o• r .I O 610 UI N I9 9.O O CJ O 40 6 0 0 W O O u w -,2 13 O .0 4O U :.l.)cr 4 .0 h ,1:.J C • 0'4,..3 O(J '3 O 0' '3 0' 9 �3 p O IO .= 0�'D U1 N .3 '0 O{J O o C) r o o o r n I2. 1 1 ;1 II l i 1 1 1 1 1 ',I 1 1 I ;1 1 1 I II I 4 "t 1 1 1 I I 'ma 4 rl r. !011%.1 r r N N, 0+1r I 1n 001-4 ..)I I• U1 l .D N •-I W L71 r O'r 4 U1{r/W O N.O O a 0'O 9 W 4 O W U t • 0. W aN 0 Ua .0 r 14 4 C'40 a4I9 U • A C N W d '0 1 • • i• •• •• •• I. • •• • •• •• •• • • • • • • • • 1 • • • •• •• a 0 lO 0O1 D 3 ....,c,„ . .1....4. .,..,1„.. . W rIn `� I V V v V '•V .4 3 0I p pip 0••'p Y U 00 C. t•0 .4 u . • . • . • ► ► •(• U U VII UIU 1 •N N.d J O V N+� 0.0 VI0 0 •UIN-0 •v•V p 0,.1.N- �0 ►USN••O O,0 V p U.•U N - O O 0 0. u - _ O 0 ? J • U N - •.I ol V _err WiCIMOWNKSING *0)1 ,V a Y. Y_W N u Y •I O J 2'2 A Y. N 1 SIO O V'P U v y N u! 0 d 313 • Y! a Y N =' O 21 b J • Y 1 W; N + O O • V; b • •;• N -Y i 1 I ' I j j uuuuu,�..uu�u 4-wu .. :,.uIUc.u;uuUluuuI • w •:.4uuC. ..u!t,. b.r..Uu -rt • .G •ll .0 ➢ n p) -4 -4"T ,'1 N I�N UI N �1 .A p1 is..'1,N :J1 ul!N Js JI JI J1 N IN N IN o j>C �.� • . N N IU N r'4- a.41" T 0s IF a s a W U I:./W uiu N IJ IN tN N IN - r I4-.+rt4-4- A 2 - • ) ' r ' .N •'.' •) T .-U N.••''N a IU N.-I.' . 0 IF W N j-.7 .b N jN O C N.- In 0 •-' I' c, 2.. Dm•Jt.ti.. aOnN u. sN14,1to -1717zinn 'illy Z =INto sIfo •0on m C n -• 21'1m m3o Oo ... E-0mm....O•- 00-.Io ..)'121..cr o. o S In(n '}1 a m 1� -4 a c •'1 c 4-n .. s n n a lar 4-n 2 z a p-to.l n m.n D •.4-In n :-4...., -+ 'n IA• c 2 i'1 c!m a .-7 z 1 r 3...n.•.rt 4-o z n n n-. m n o c m n c 1 m rt z 1-... I< O 1- :> i - -s0 --4. _NOD O• '1 .n7_j • :'t • f.t 40 N Q- r noz a -•m7_ 0 < D .rNzmzA 0 moo •in 01 < 1 O u A m..1 O o 4-r Nm m ztnm.i r ' '.z.. Z CIb '11Drn U) -mOCrt - x)1132 OM IM T MD )s 2 <10 n4- 'A000.1 -4rrtO.. -. 0 • .. 2 A0A1'I m 02 1 < z ..20-40 no 00 2.4 .-Jr'mro nzmz-4 otnoSN2 zn mm 1m C m 1'13 -. D 110 C o rrnn zmNVtN2.- zlox4-.< 00m OD --I.s .-.9 IS z z C,Ul A l-4 G) m 4- D 2 MIXMM A m!/1 O Us D z m m n z m min Iz 0 C C m73 -40 rn r1 o 013m0 aAm 1 ) m0•. Gfr .-. a m ) Nv111 14- x 1'I NOHa 1 N• 7 ''N U 1 o 11 2 LL) .:I . c .'i rt .. .:.1 N 32 Mm 11 r OOV1 Am:!l1103.. 0 mn -413D z11 Om 0 o. onm03 ; n•. C' zr • 14-n -4..m00 12 m2. 0 2C 'm -4 mC110;'1 S z 20) 13 (403200r nca 2..1 /. n 2 0 n -4 A M Tt z P.M n 0] 2M< .42 I'1 0 S O r 100 M -I 00 0 00.4 n) 2 O m 4-o 0 t'i In 0 O7 r m A mm -4 2 (n m -ie 1 m <: '1 0 N a O. 2m < it to r • ' M2 -t 0 c 2 -4 m N 1 -4 0) m m I m N 1 0m I im Z rn n C 0 r a N y 01 •- 4- CO ' N P. 0' W A • • • • • • • 1. • 01 0 .7 N U CO N O N N N 1 1-4 N W 4-.• ,m T 2 IO C) alas O CA 01 N -• .4. a -4 I'Q W N 000r 02 V .0 0 o 4-.Om W1AN WNr-4m -4 4-0' u (finN a n C • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . • • • I. • • • • • • • • • • •y1 N -4 �a cfJC: .10070tp O0 0O<0 O '3 N0G 0 N+.10 4-O u 70In0U.:Jr C lm j I I r o i N u 0 •7 ..,,,..,,,,,0 1„,, a a OO a c a: . O 0 O u 4- Q 0 N'47 o .0 0 0 2 u N n I I 1 I .. 2 iz j F i O Ic I • 2 m <2 n r. a m I 10.1 I i i I ` h j0 E I1 �� 2 j I I 1.0 I I ra • l('I ,7 a N --• a j 0' a0 4 N P. 4- P. -4 U c ICJI 0 .p ♦ 001.. N W W F ►- •.. • • p• • •.�.. •' • • • •'' • • • • l ( 0' c -4 NJ N G N a N 3NO .ON - 0 a N 0 O -4OWGON0'.L O 0 CD 0000 0 :30 O L) O u O N O ' LJ o m m N O IN O O 3 O 0 CO i 0. 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < • • I• • • • • • • • • • • • •r- • • • • • • I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • m L1 ') (3(3Ø(3C)- (30Q0 (3 0 0 O.O p O 7 J i#O O 4 -3 0000000000 7 j - O Oet 0O Z O 0O O 0 0 O O O G:J O O O O O,7 0 f' 0 O J 000 O a 1 U O C .4 m t ' .O. N I I • I n,. -4 N j ,4' N r r I •- O -4 IN 0'4- yNN NN N W P. r4- 4- 2 G N 4 N r ( CA o 'D N O'UI r a CO 2 N N a -4-4 0 W D N N 00 WOW 0408-00-44-.0 u) r 0c1100100+00 3. N 'O N r 07N j U)CA2 W-Li00'm'O W W I 08000040000 n • • I• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • !• • • • • • •. • • • • •' 0 0 03 r 10 OaU0'4 0100 a-0O 000N 000 N000 a cI44-00 CM 0OG4- 0 N C. X11 N m Uttar,. -) OIO O W a(.7(-1000.O -) •'1 A 0 0 0 a Cl 300 3 0 •3 O 00,3 N D j I 4 1 4-o Co + I la 1 S. r N ~ II o r j N �s a 4- P. m ,,Da •Ls N• N 0'IU O •'14- •N j 1 j► 1•. • ,• • • i. • • • • IC N 0' 0' UIIo .O N u1'0 0 NON :01.01..11 0' 1 4- W a'0 N N OD U r 10 I j u) 4 0' 0i4- .000w3 Nm arrj4-.0OI .O N' T aN►-Nr2m 77 O' N 7n (DIN 0 . 003:1 r./4-nI'o a m03W W W34-GT O-4NNaG '- • • • • • ,• • • • • • I• • • • • • 1• • • • • •I• • • • •. • ,• • • • • • • • ,n Ij N 000100 JGO Nn 004ON000UIOO aQ'3 ,\1 ( OCIOOr ON �Z i I 0 N N -:1 0'No '' 7 t:-).4f0, Q _,10 O•.. c1 o Gla O J 0 a ,7,J (Jr 010 !D ti Iu O CO O N n a 1 I it 11 1114 I 1 I 1 4 1 1 1 I1 1 .m O I f a N 'F r I �'•4-4- f •'• r �I r r r m NIN -424-4-'O Q' N 0' 04- -04.F.OIJO C' r 0' 10 210 4.112,-.C.4 IN2 r 1 -4 I.44 NjW W, 0'r • F. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • s �•'0 { -4 f0' N ash. ..21.4 .'..o m o ' 4 I.3 D m N 0'0 O N 0 N I ki'Y • ,N-O •.•b• u•b• N•I S b Y b:Y Y Y Y NY O . 1 v 9 J • u N -p W b VW U y W Y W 4 N N N 3,2 W NN 0 -0 .1 SO- D W•N:"5 •;•V.Y'.W N __ _---_______ . _ 1 • 1:177 LM NI-N N •1 • Ci U • W1 N • • y V 10 U I W W U-' J N N;N N ,'.'t N y N I N N •' , V ?'U - -' - - O O VI O N •:Y N UO I 1 I 1 i a • aµsi. I• as a a a a • aoaauaala .oataaaaaaaa . aa . ! aaiaaaaoa1aa 1 11 r W • WW W I• L. LA :• NNN ..)N NN r1 NN IvNNP4 NNNN V•N • P.r•.!4•r.r•'••r.•4..4 jaC .J W • NNN • rN Ns 4.N.4 • N l.I ..1 as a a.42 ..New '.t to 1,1 N N NI I. N.. • 2 :11 JI a OIO :M UIP"' 3 't72 7) u • NNv • J•LA 42 N4••-2 • LA ,-: aUN 4-I•' P. �....2 a uFV•. <J'.,- • I N►• '3N r'to 62,DIN . ;AO 1 .l 0 -4m m r m m a r 0 O to N•.0 of 4 l a C'1.c m lino :'1 i3 f) •i)in - C Z 221 ') 1 vI N ICS N C A 70 C :Inn -0 11 I.-••r 2 C m C C -4 A 1m m a o 1 r 0 i c a r o S m �1 2 2 O 1'1 .'I rn mac a 12 c. a 2 r to O .'SIT a C)ri CI ;n cn A C)ri p a -4 a -• 14 Cl C.7 :41 .i 21112 .1 �•8A a 7 ? 17 < r..C I .• r, < - - '11 T a 2 •-•- a rrD 1.-. 2 Cr A Or 'tH sl - ,Z.'*1.. N 22Ir to of am a z a - m C < o-. r • 2 2-•r F-• n... .40(-10.-e20 a N A� S • • C l• '9 1 1 5 .. A A G '8 - 1'-. 1-• Ate -. 0 :p ✓ 7 m '."7 ) m A.-• 7. O r)A.-• 3 N r 2 • I < A a m �' r 1�f T O J 1).--...,-. II'1 Ci C w A ' ''Y ) 1 • 2 "1AoNl oz09.2 2aN"Ia C -4 2 ar al 02 22 21') 2.1 !!or, 1 m0 i 4. .. GIA f•, 01 aA -4-4 a 0-t N< < •.a U (n 0 r fn r < N A 4) N A 4,mCi) (A2 X a -% r '1 .T.' 4 A A L-, 1'1 1 41 3 2'...7 C 1 :(n to C 3 • 1 1'1 1 4 :la 1'I Ito 4 -4 0) 204< . S ti 0 a H 3 IZ m 1• 1 2 r V A • Cm N n o lr '1 •, 1 -n •'1 rem S m .. I'1 a 2 • 02.-• 2.4T1r N7 a . 3 -• • - MP • TIT m 2O..r. .. M. CC •11 a a 2 c-. A 0 • t•1 47 r 4. 2 Q) -• a 2 04• •'7. r A '0 r a 1 2 T .D A a T r r -4.r 7C f.) .. < N II I to 2 31 mi- 2 C 4. 01 . r.. < '00 Cl a -4 I. r r .. J ,1 n .. to -n 1 I7 N N 4 Cl a• ANa -c ! J2 a• z m• ..''1 •• (1• A 0 '11 0 A '1 m - .0m 1 .. •. a m t1(r'1 M A 0.... -1-4-4 2C in I'1 :0 m - < A 2 I.I a 2-• "0:02 O to m 222 ^.1 7 !I < 0 . .4< •.. a = r -42 a m a C N 10 0 o -4 -22 c7 4 A ••• .4.• N • 1 r4 11 N •• • C C ••m m 4 m m Cl Ma • - a a I'1 TI a A 2 N .4 Nm AN .r • AN n 2a m A o .. • a A 2' t1 n r a -4 PIP) o f 2 a . h A O n 1 •• 0 2 A c m x r! cm 4+ r W N r. A V ' . r V • •+m J al 00. u O N m W N ^)4• IN V 4( A40(.4 F• U (A N CA to N. 0 N O 02 .D UJ1 N 1a 2 d .4 3 07 U . N a N 01 •T•+ r Ji.4 0 IU -.I N Co N '0 co • Ot CO N C2 • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I-1 1 A r %r• .. -2IAa:JaOO .JCaok1OW.1CJN WWCOOa . 0.0QN O0UIJU �0.NIaLC O ca c.., „rcAr r.O .2 ,7 r O c-:N .4 7 A.0 v N F 31 N O c) N 0 a .Q O O D '7 t) -P.1CM D is r 3 M I O 1 I 1 I 2 G • 1 A 1 < m I S la I • A Ir• a z 1Z 1C1 In m Im I n Ip h t I 4+ 1 I • a .. w N I-0 r. '4+ (U1 CO 4. O IG•• ♦. 4.N►+ 4+r .J A H iW W Ir )V.p'UI CO O 10 r r U1 D1►+.4-4.4 r 0•I-40 co IN 0.UI a+(A.O a .0 cuo UI a' •1 10' r•I N 0 A •- 0 r • I. 1.4 .4 • • • • • • • 44 . . . . . a • • • 464 . 0 . • •. • • • • 1• • 0 -7 0 'V .4 O p.4 O O N U1 CA -.100N1.000000 .4/+:71 a N IU N.0 0• .D 4.441002M (A I.0 N 'O Co cS IO0 -.4 IV OQUl0 m 000Ob1�000ON 0.4O UOC•)0. W N :1.42 0UI .70 .3 23 O D O '+7.O 0 <20420o o o a 0 0 1- d•0 0 0 U I 0 U i 0 0 010 0 0 0 .. . U I O O N O c a 000 I.. • • • 4 • • • •. • • • • • • • • • •• • • • •. •, . • • • • • • • • • • • • I• •. • • .3 1 C.500 . . 1.510 0 0 0 C Q CSO 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 •5 c 7 O O 0 O 4.7.1.C.0004:141,:771,..11:2 11 .. I 1 ;O O !- ,71‘14404.1G....1 O 4,..7,7 -.27=000C3 OOO -2O 00c7.1 7 G G CS CS c c,O a O O I►. Iz i Ii. 1 , • u, I a 1 r j IV IW 4 �•+ r W r v) W N N a -4 -4 a I.4 N. (11 Isa a O T r• r r N 0.W N;:+CO CO o IN...ci N O N 040 r W N .0 .0 A • • • • • • • + • • r • • • • • • • • • ♦ • 4 • • • • • • • • a • 1 O 42 N to 1m is UI Co Co CO 07 U 14•-.0.0 O r j .O N W Ut IW. co N r a Ui ;-.1 .4 IN N iF•CO O Ui -4 I••( 0. IP UI CO 0`N r'.0 4 CO CO N N 02 N a .0 0•.0 .0 UI 0. .0 O CA ala- IV) 0 � 'JC•.0 4 0.4 G.4 N 111I�••M' 04) .0 m a W 0 •41.O k)1 r a N U,W •t 0 r O ‘,200, 0 10 "4C00 It'i • • • I• • I• • ,• • . • • b • • • • I• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• • • • • • •. • • • I1 O 1C) CA Ui :7!(•••N •0 a�0 UI U100 I ...,..0II�• ......�. O N.4O O. .Oam O 0...,......„,,,, C Ci a 4-.O w 's, o 0 o v 3 O U,N O►+0.0•m u.4 U1 O W v W 0•T.0 O O O UI O W o .4.0 t7 m.0 .D Ia 1 r t7 �W I I - CD a IW 1 1 4+ A u 1 ;2 is r !tit 11.4 a I r r 0 r r•-W W N m .C12 W !-1 0•r i0 c...a aa.o �N WO 1 .D +4-W`. 4 ..4 .....ON 0. NW0• 0aN. CI)..W4- I~ I.• j• • • '• •.•- • • M' • • •' • • • • C • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • < CT N .-4. - •-•1.1 N r N m k1(. ,21C7 ,-!.. ,02 .00a.4O N WI UI a I••0 N IO 'D.t 0•u•+ N O It11 r T 0.O'Co N.1 a'0. 0 'a c a NN a NIC r.OUI o I)+ .010'. CA O'0• UI r 1W .4 C)ia N O✓ .1.(.44+ 0CA 0'. m o .O N (11,0.O O a to N r u t7. T COI0•N u a c) IW n UI 10 32.11 .400UI N.D IO2 CO (r I o n a N to N to.3 N:r S "-• ▪ 4 • • • •• • • • • • • L • I• • • '• • • • • '• • • • • • II • • • • • • i• • • • • • • a 0' la G '.a O+.4 0:.o N UI c% .0 I° 0 1.4 o u l.4 a N IUi.O.0 4. O.N IN .O u 0 CCN O 1 0.O.O - CI, 1� -4:a -4 2 •7 JI •• ..,No N 1. o la c')l c3 0(A 7 .7 UI CO r a IND UI -- ,,,,kA • 4- .4 .4 a a••• .3 I U1 0.4 .2 W 4•o N'I.- r ;A ''n 11 !I I 1 1 I'm i r1 r 1 .D lm N1 0• a I• 0 .4 a -INCA a 40 IU1 N a 0 a O W v'CMT W a 0.1 -•.0 0• NUI G,1-4 0. M'C ir+ 1-1 W U1 UI ,0 4.p.N �+UI a iUl W..C.. N(AO 0. 3)N N 0.1a O W 4-.10 .4-4 U7'.•- a I L-11..-.1411-. • • • '• I• • • • • • • I • • • I• • • • • I• • • i •. • ;• • • • I• • • • .• . I� IO 44.4 IU, NNa W b• N'.O•• U• a -.N0.WI-t .0.0W'n0. Or014+ • vCD0• ao Ut aIM A1 I 14. feeI �{}/ yy ''JJyyyN.• I.J• :.I N O •'O V P U Y f•J N 020 V O OI O b 2 y N u 0 • O V O U t 1•J N '0 • O V •V • W N I%O Oi0 J O 'J •U N -'O 0 3 V i0 0 • y''14-0•.•V•U.• 4 N a . t f t 1p u' g4N'44 •' 0 J8i3 DU• N • ►IY Y Y I W U W,W N U, U N N IN NN: ' Y NIN N •10 7, p,4 - LI, N 3I• 0 ., a . ! . N -Y i 1 I a I r a is a s ja P • r i * 1 1 • l a sal • la a ,• .1 .• .T • co!..I A UI:A _'1 •• 0 0 P a a • :A GAA 4:AI • I4 G GG 44IG Co(Al • 14 G. U • GG I• n C J A. • r'rrr .) .: 1* 13.13 Nr • .2A1.0 .0 .O ► D9'1112AMi-• MV1 * ;s1T7` • [LA‘4 1• n .» r I. '13 )-J.Q j) 1• -alms :.1 0 • O' afl3P ' • IIa� (ANir JLINrUI • 1Nr J • Ir.7 I• =:7 •- - In .annn:na Ia zlmmnc. n saran c rla ar .iczrll •• .cMa m yr 1-i ,c n Z A -4 IJs n n Ia r a '-.x• r7C IS o , clI+C .a -• IQ.It n C n n In n.r 2 I'1 a'nl a a>rt- a .Z.,:: .-1 -• to r"14 -17112,I 1.• 011 n a 1* 2 '-1 0 0 rn 2 hti I n .. a s 1-1 -.rn N IT n 2 -- i..O u ♦•- '-• rn •. „F__,, ,,„ IN r Ir n ar T ... ..m0, r .4 2 r O D tel 0 n c -• tJ• z 7 n < Q. 4 a j-, a41 -r( 10 71M0 '1I4 • ...rn102• 77 r+ �nn...0 * aa4 1) n• 4r r') 0 rn In n n In • 2 r 2.7 N 2 -'1 0M21.420 n a > r IS r- m .7 N tr ••'r r rIr. r-1 -.-4 a n O am 1`1 .. r12'n^ r.. 2 111 IS 2 IZ2 IN rn m -. 2 / 1 'I f• a n< ,"n M. T N N 2 71 -r l A 0 2 (i) C') Cl I r U) Gs O In Z .• *1C rn i a 10 2 IiC Y 0 ''1 n CM U) 20 ,4 -40 1- '1 20=.41 .m.-I V1 9 A 11O -lo ID ('(Cl 1(/)1 0 * a mm 2C 7400 D1 4 n P••. ..a _ O ..• O'n C C T -4 21 n 0 N n r m2 ON A 1-•A In r O N 4 m w CO ' n tl a a -! 2 •C r.r.)n r' A O cm N N rn ro n 'a t i t n 0r• a y In -1 r R 2 ''7 1iki 'J' 1 4 N2 OM • z = :iiA A AZ -4 r m Crl CI IN .. :J .1 a 3 n 2 . n 4. • T A CO N r .. 11 r)4 n \ •. A••. •1) -.0 O '11 t) 2 C ('l ITV n -1 C. n < 0 m r'l m N 2 • 2 n r 0 I 'Cl. 2 A A. 2C rl -. < zN 1 2 r c n 0.4 a -. -on -4 -.r c -. • :. N o -IC 2 '1 N 2 -.�• -•m a 2 7n. 7t tel ..• 2 IS 2 r7 .-•2C O • 0. V N 2 N 11 •• rn in N OO r A T z A c Cr -• •. 1n 4 rn(n 2.., In . r1 rn•Cr D. n •• LI 1-0 0 rn r 2 n • a 2 1 -4 0 1 N -4 I A n - 2 1 IS 0 A InO Z 2 -4 • Cl 0 Jr -0 • -a a 0 V A IS -4 H • 2n C m A I x •, .. "' a Ni0' Co a1.0 00 u • m 10 a0) NN a 0 m r 0'1 r NNr r rN G .IGN a .1G N rn rJG UI to , c�i. a 0 0 N 0 -41 J7 NdGG N DON a I.0r N UI C..10-4G a Z IN ,A OIG a 0a C N 0' N 41 U1 �N G UI a O• N G -I IA .0 ao O a 0' d ''n I2 O 1..., .... .4c...,41,....1 .• ir--J � .. ] N J O IJ 0 r I J 10.00c, ,-77.000 UI l(0 1:i. UI V 0 r a •O .] !a% .) c?IUl r jo A ., �::J UI .J 3I.J O U1, 7' G N 4 ' .>Ul A 0.A Ci , O v N r r O D O -1 2 IC 4 A IC 2 r1 A n A j In m Im i I i I 0 i I I NaIA I I I I I I ( ~ I i m II.0 1 0' • 03 Al r O r N G Ir r IN lire r -0 N '0' im N ms A a r r p• r r r Ul G r 10 G-t P r ms a .0 IN.0 OD .0 07 0 4 a. • • w • • • • • 1.• • • • • . • • • • • • . .. • •.• • • • 0 u IN jU 0'O U1 I J( U1 0 0 0 .0 0 r 40 4 !0 r U0 4 a a G r r P.44 O 00 0 'O Cr Id o ..10„,> O U1 iiN IG UI u a IC o .J u O 0' U1 .1 O N 0' UI 0400 o UI O O 0' r o ca N 0-4 m a O O c .7 IJ oUI N 10 N UI o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o IO a o N O UI O M•• • A • • • • '• • • • • • • IS • • • • • • • • • t • • • •-. • •: • • • • • t • • D aa ..3 C.C2 C2 C704 C O O .l 00 O as C2 di O O 0040 a o 0o0 f1 I.340 O OO O 1 C.) !", c.)j.: a n .� .. a 0 cm .1 A 7 O ,,O o O CI a O r]O o 7 a O O O 0 66O Cl O O C .9 M 1 I 2< I rn I r v. !U) G r I j J I._., N r N N I ►" ✓ :NJ N u U11IA W U1 G1 r I UI -1 -1 G ILO r a D .a UI 0 1.4 CO a O y IV .,0 a • • '• • • I. ' • • • • • • • 1• • • •• •• • •• 1• •. • • •-.• I. A 'N 40%.01.64 -.4 n NI GUI .0 a 7) 0'i a .0 0' 4 U• 0 G N 1.4470 U) ra la x• 47 1. is G-. . a J' NM m N r(G a i G 7.. .. ... G N N N N-P a N N 0' N.a.. I-1 10-4IN Cl ;G 2 .0010 -4 G r NO r r N IC C)A o 0.0.0 .4 r NW 0' 0' - N UI UI a. 0 1r)-40 0 • '• • :• • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • IS • • • • • • • • • I• • • • • • • M IG ,71.(11 N 0'Io a 4 40000 a 001.0- MN N 10 G a O O r O.N O 0' S G4 4 .O 1.14.4, G 1C -n o • n i.s r U11, •-- .U1. N O r, r t] 0' O O r:r UI 0' 0'r 0'.7 a 0'O.4 0 G '2'2-V V <'J- :N Ir O I I H a l J> I i G I I 1 r 0 (A i ri A • ar.0 la ms r tPA o r I• rn o0 'G 'G N N IG'0 ( ►• Ir N r r N UI ms 10'r N 4.414....0.0 °' • • • • 1• • I •. • • • • • • • '• • • • • •. • • '• • • r. . I• C N ''4 ''a-)O 01140 V 0 -1 r 20 '0 O GIN O G UI r m a 'SIO'N G UI G(A CO 'a a.0 ;10• ,n C3 ,n 2 r Ola 0 2 T, - to m N 0'!tJ a.l r 'O 0'• a N .n UI a UI r r N-1 cn N 0' 10 a s: '.• 'r ;.0 41m - ',G fr.! 9 .) G .n G 1•. UI 0% .O r U)UI-4 a to.4 r G A N -• .0 a UI -. • • • • • • • • A • • • • !• • • • • • • I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • IS CJ ;A J,U1 a G,0 UI 1G G•-1 ] GIO P. J UI00'VI .A G 0'0.1:2 O 0Di0 V O) G r 0.0' O im-1 0' j2 '7 L. ',G )''') .J(111:'..13 jUl UI J )61- a 7 t:,ICI r Ui a a A a � '7 4•I')G 6 .I N N G G C..4 1 N .n a t ,1 1 ( i 1 1 I i •„ .Ian i .O I,UI 'a a0' a !r r T "7 .J N*'GUII N `0' 0' .7'10 U1 00'1 0 '7,2C2 -4 4m l0l a is '0 'S al A !G -4 a :7 N NLN a02 0' '0' N NIN N •0N A 'a Ui a • • .• • • • '• • • • • • • • • • •0 • • •• • • • • • • • • • • I• O cY -4 '4a .G .• .:J 1C., a a :-i 1 • 2 'N I•s a 1a X 14.3 .101+G Cl I N r .0 'a .0 N .0 a= la In tU ! ' � N I I I1 1 I i I I 1 I 1 1 1 oMSN ObeeVe : •NpigpsY04l4 40 •OO • V '• 1 ►Nt0y2Wyyt4N- yN'OJO 3'3 3 3 tyy•a VI••►WN- •t•V••,•WN ) v■ ,.r.CE F.ER.OE.I,CI MC. 10}. A 14A ✓ U A V D 'tJ Y�yy W :1 U W U U Y vO (t N N' ; N N N N - . - + \ .. 0 • V O a •'a N U • t1 N - O OD Ol,N D v - J O O V, 0. M • W N -• J L D Y N - O OI O V O.N • Y� N O, ( i • • 0,00 .0 • • I Ill • o .a 1.3 .o ,a .0 -4 !a 0 4•1 * 310) 33 • Nr Az O 00I.)21 2I7 "0 C -f O DIA n fnrnIi '1 !.L O 2 2 x .n D 1 14«. 4.1m .~.rn u�k*I C Z < a A 22= -11 O 2 I 0 >--E 2 '110 0 mnx .n I!:'I N 2 Cn 2 K1 1 IV+r^2 T i7 't1 2 H -) A I tl V) C rn Cl - N rn 04 A I 2 2 < m -1 11 0 D 7 0 1 y Poi r 0 "111 ...• 1 0 tom. 2 11 0 C A O V) C m )s in A t1 0.. ✓ VI rn O p N w rn cis 2..1) • m• n -a I ,n I I Iv s 'D I> n c in xi rx v N F• r 13 • + • In ,► 1+ Ul N•N y 1.4 ♦ 41 nr- + N 02 In•�t I j, 0 V .1 N W 4-) i • • • • • • • • 1-+ •.1 y d 1) 0 W r Io a:� IC O I • N ►'0 - ; UI J - TZ H I I O h I 1Z F I i �Imo= I , , , , , ... ,. n i II 73 4 0 I ' N • 1 r I hi; N m N U 13 u 0 NOs,, al IV N • • I .0 I o A • • • • • • ,• • n p C7 O O O U IC) O .• 0 O O•) O 0 O O IM 12-4 I I I m I I •N 1 T U< r G •• P. + P.N • I 22 .O UI N 4 .4 43 Ul I tit Ed Co 1+)1 N C if.4 N I • • •• • • • • • -4 D O I n1 0 9 r N c0100 ,,C .4 r100-NUI n O I n it 0 I n 1 I ! I u i -1 r u v • rn r r II 1 • • • • • it .� .4 .o w v u 1%) • •c W N , I i I I (4 j I • `I • • n• ••- •• O G 2 V I I I < T` 42 O '1 �'N� 3� CI In 10 I I I I I '• r Irl II E t V r co N u I I03 Crs .) • 1.4 I p I _ y NJ yN� vI'ILIII vvVV !O • OTONSTU N? sOOtItatl•INYOOOV. —.. .. _ QO • vs JDVy VII S 3 =IOOOv•.l ! 'wN -OO'• 5O•IDYN_A / CITY OF SHAKOPEE BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IN AUGUST, 1981 5421 Edward Gilles ' 126 South Atwood Remodel $ 800 5422 J . B. Swedenborg 129 South Holmes Remodel 187 ,000 5423 Scottland Bldrs. 4901 Valley Ind. Blvd. Ofc/Whse 1 , 158,000 5424 B. B. Baird 4401 Valley Ind. Blvd. Sign 200 5425 Donald J . Booth Route 1 , Box 999B Remodel 4,000 5426 Dean Coiligan 1098 Tyler Street Deck1 ,000 5427 Rick Massie 3662 Marschall Road House 70,000 e d&4 daj -c(x,-'(- 5428 Steve Meyer 1047 Jackson Street Fireplace 2 ,400 5429 Laurent Bldrs. 1718 13th Avenue House 58 ,000 of e 9 646 5 , iV ewaP � 5430 Steven D. Olson 3821 Bridge Spur House 85,000 ore.-b4 8?-6 acG 4 5431 Spirit Wings Const . 1065 Swift Street Addition 10,000 5432 Lance Nemanic 1712 Marschall Road Fence 268 5433 Bush Lake Indst. 4571 Valley Ind. Blvd. Addition 6, 500 5434 Melvin W. Pomije 547 Minnesota Street House 42 , 929 c7foe fi ,GAA..? n?ar-ty •?,14‹ 5435 Melvin W. Pomije 526 Minnesota Street House 48, 548 /0 3 a 5436 Edward Gilles 126 south Atwood Alteration 600 5437 Mrs. Clarence Ragan 935 West 5th Patio 400 5438 Richard W. Wallin 1037 Tyler Street Patio 9 , 500 5439 Richard Wiggin 1950 West 12th 4-unit Twnhse 160,000 4 f4 a 5440 William Scheurer 922 East 4th Avencfe Wood Stove 400 5441 J & J Hennen 807 East 1st Avenue Sign 200 5442 J & J Hennen 807 East 1st Avenue Pumps/Island 19,000 5443 Gerald Mareck 724 West 7th Avenue Garage 6, 400 TOTAL: $1 , 871 , 145 �: S C FTY OF SHAKOPEE BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT August, 1981 PERMITS ISSUED Aug Yr. to Date Total Previous Year 5421 - 5443 Number Number Valuation Number Valuation ' -MO . YTD . • Single Fam. -Sewered 3 23 1 , 327,000 3 14 771 , 600 Single Film . -Septic 2 7 562,000 0 1 70,000 Multiple Dwellings 1 11 1 , 264,000 2 10 2 , 647 , 438 (Mo .Units) (YTD Units) ( 4) (32) (6) ( 22) Dwelling Additions 1 20 125, 125 1 15 94, 500 Other - - - 0 1 12 ,000 Business District - 3* 240,000 2 7 2 , 839, 500 Agricultural - 1 132,000 - 1 13,000 Industrial -Sewered 1 3 2 ,343 ,000 0 15 20,034, 500 Industrial -Septic - 3 792,000 1 5 610, 900 Accessory/Garages 1 27 150, 750 6 19 86, 960 Signs & Fences 3 10 15, 718 3 15 33, 633 Fireplaces/Wood Stove 2 5 92,000 - - - Grading/Foundation - 2 • 59,000 1 1 7,000 Remodeling (Res. ) 6 24 89, 630 9 39 61 , 870 Remodeling ( Inst . ) - -- 2 5 ,300 - 3 154, 500 Remodeling (Other) 3 29 1 , 286, 500 6 33 477, 620 TOTAL TAXABLE 23 168 8 , 396,000 34 175 27, 760, 581 TOTAL INSTITUTTCNAL 0 2 5 , 300 - 3 154, 500 GRAND TOTAL 23 170 8 , 401 , 300 34 178 27 , 915 ,081 MO . YTD . MO . YTD. Variances 1 4 2 8 Conditional Use 3 13 3 12 Re-Zoning - 1 - 8 Moving - 3 - 1 Electric Permits 13 112 53 127 Plmbg. & Htg. Permits 22 135 25 107 Razing Permits Residential - - - 1 Commercial - - - - 1 Tota] dwelling units in City after completion of all construction permitted to date 3 , 495 *Circus tent - no valuation Cora Underwood Bldg. Dept. Secretary 404 CITY OF SHAKOPEE � , INCORPORATED 1890 *At '„ 129 E. First Ave. - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445-3650 0 August 28, 1981. To the Mayor, Councilmembers , All Other City Officials , and Their Spouses I wish to extend to you a cordial invitation to attend the Regional Meeting of the League of Minnesota Cities to be held at the Knights of Columbus Hall in Shakopee on September 30, 1981 . Beginning at 2 :30 P.M. , there will be a Roundtable Discussion for all Local Government Officials . This will be a meeting of interest to all city administrative persons , elected officials , and employees whose duties may involve areas of risk, liability and safety. The program will include 1) a brief presentation of the current status of the League ' s insurance program, 2) a dis- cussion of city safety and liability issues and 3) a brief presen- tation of the League ' s energy and noise control programs . The supper will begin at 6 : 30 P.M. and tickets are $6 .00 including gratuity. A social hour will precede the supper. I am enclosing a postcard for reservations to be returned by September 25 , 1981 . You will note that if you make reservations for more persons than actually attend, you may be billed for those who do not come unless I am notified five days before the meeting of any changes . After supper there will be a panel discussion by League staff and board members of questions of concern to attending cities . A brief status report on the proposed League building will be given. Legislators and candidates have been invited to attend as well as representatives from those state agencies who come into frequent contact with cities . Adjournment will be no later than 9 : 30 P.M. Sincerely, /42elfeCt/ill W. C. Harbeck Mayor WCH/jms The Heart of Progress Valley An Equal Opportunity Employer EC EPIED AUG 281981 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL CITY OF3HAKOPE Suite 300 Metro Square Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55 :01 August 26, 1981 TO: Respondents of Public Hearing on 208 Water Quality Management Development Guide/Policy Plan Amendments FROM: Environmental Planning Staff Attached is a copy of the staff report responses to issues raised in association with the June 23, 1981 public hearing on proposed amendments to the Water Quality Management Development Guide/Policy Plan. All issues raised either verbally at the hearing or received in written form through the 20th of August are included. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Suite 300 Metro Square Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 MEMORANDUM August 26, 1981 TO: 208 Water Quality Management Advisory Committee FROM: Environmental Planning Staff SUBJECT: Draft 208 Water Quality Management Development Guide/Policy Plan Amendments -- Responses to Issues Raised at the Public Hearing Attached are the comments relative to the amendments proposed to the Water Quality Management Plan (Point Source) at a public hearing on June 25, 1981. Each comment or set of similar comments is followed by the appropriate section from the Plan, a staff analysis of the issue and a recomendation. Only comments that are critical of the proposed amendments or suggest some new material are included here. Those comments that are supportive, while most welcome, are not included. The comments deal with the following subjects: o Ammonia treatment charges o Computer mapping o Data error o Existing sewer system o Financial issues o Flow data o Infiltration and Inflow o Specific sources of sewage o Wastewater treatment plants Anoka Chaska Empire Maple Plain Medina Metropolitan Seneca Stillwater o Interceptors Blaine CAB Lake Ann II Lino Lakes Ramsey Second Savage RECOMMENDATION That the recommendations on each issue area contained in the attachment be accepted and transmitted to the Physical Development Committee for inclusion in an adopted amendment package to the Water Quality Management Development Guide/Policy Plan. - 1 - J PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS AND RESPONSES (Page numbers refer to the May 1981 Water Quality Management document.) 1. Ammonia Treatment Charges Comment and Source The St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce Environmental Task Force. Recommends that payment for more stringent ammonia treatment, if required at Metropolitan System plants, be borne by the generators as a possible separate sanitary waste charge for ammonia similar to the industrial- strength surcharge. Analysis Treatment charges are initiated by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) with review and comment by the Council . The Development Guide/Policy Plan as a directive from the Council to the MWCC does not, • therefore, recommend on user charge systems. The suggestion from the St. Paul Chamber will be passed on to the MWCC for their consideration. Recommendation No changes are warranted. The suggestion will be passed on in writing to the MWCC. 2. Computer Mapping Comment and Source The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Recommends inclusion of provision for MWCC to undertake computer mapping and documentation of the sewage conveyance system with appropriate informa- tion on system use, age, location, etc. for use in analysis and planning. Analysis (Page 17) The 208 Development Guide/Policy Plan on Water Quality Management takes a strong position on the need to monitor and document the status of the existing sewer system on a continuing basis and is thus in full accord with the MWCC proposal. Recommendation (Page 90) Add a new heading and paragraph before the "Municipal Wastewater Treatment Systems" that reads as follows: - 2 - "Joint MWCC-MC Projects 1981-84 Period. The MWCC should include in its 1982-86 Development Program a proposal to establish and operate a computer mapping and documentation project of the sewage conveyance system. This project should be established as a permanent ongoing operation. It should be planned and operated as a joint project between the MWCC and the MC." 3. Data Error Comment and Source The City of Chaska (Page 76) Chaska representatives question the year 2000 population figure on page 76 as being too low. Analysis The population figure given is 11,400 for 2000 as compared with 15,500 for 1990. The correct year 2000 projection is 22,400. Recommendation (Page 76) Change the projection of sewered population to "22,400." 4. Financial Issues Comment and Source The St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce Environmental Task Force and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission The Chamber questions what the impact of sizable proposed sewer expendi- tures will be on other needed Metropolitan Area governmental services; on - how much federal and state money will be available and whether the sewer construction can be extended over a longer time than proposed; and wonders who will pay for the operation of an advanced wastewater treatment (AWT) program at the Metro WWTP? The MWCC in recognition of funding constraints would like to make it clear that the Commission may at times have to construct projects 'related to interim upgrading or/and expansion. Analysis The financial aspects of sewer construction are likely to become much more of an issue in coming years than it has in the past as federal funds are expected to be cut very sharply. Competition of various functional projects for metropolitan bonding money is expected and some sewer project may have to be stretched out more than planned. The users of the system will pay the operating costs associated with AWT. - 3 - Recommendation (Page 59) As a note of financial caution and responsibility add the following new paragraph ahead of the "Mississippi River Treatment Plants and Service Areas." Most of the sewer system improvements made under the direction of the MWCC and MC were constructed with large federal contributions, usually 75 per- cent of cost. The Reagan Administration has indicated it intends to reduce sewer construction funds very substantially and to focus available money on projects that will considerably reduce or eliminate existing pollution. This could result in a slow down, stretch out or rescoping of some projects. More interim improvements and/or expansions may be necessary with major construction extended beyond the timing shown in this plan. It could also result in a demand for more local (metropolitan) sewer construction bonding money than in the past and induce increased competition among functions for metropolitan financial support. The total metropolitan investment framework and the need to protect the Region's credit rating will assume greater significance. Some hard financial decisions on sewer construction may have to be made in the near future." 5. Flow Data Comments and Sources Apple Valley, Bloomington, Farmington, Lakeville, Chanhassen Bloomington says the Council 's 1990 flow projection for their city was reached in 1980 and that the 1990 and 2000 figures are much too low. They further suggest that the projected flow figures for the other communities using the Seneca WWTP are too low and the plant will run out of capacity sooner than the Council 's projections indicate. The City does anticipate new Council projections in a few years. Apple Valley and Lakeville contend the flow data for their cities and for Farmington are too low and the Empire WWTP will need expansion earlier than the Council 's projections would suggest. Apple Valley, Farmington, and Lakeville also say the 1980 flow at Empire was 3.68 mgd not 3.45 as given on page 84 of the draft Plan. Chanhassen would like its projected flows raised at least to the level indicated in the 1977 system statement and urges local review and input to any revisions of the flow projections by the Council . Farmington requests that the (flow) projections indicated in the report not be automatically converted to limitations on development. Analysis (Page 50) Flow projections will have to be revised for the communities and the plants that serve them. Some projections will be reduced and others expanded. On page 50 of the Draft Plan there is a statement on the intent to revise as soon as the symptomatic data and revised methodology become available. Such a revision will constitute an amendment to the Plan and will go through the full public review and hearing process so local units - 4 - of government will be able to participate and state their views. The revision of the flow data will also trigger a review of plant expansion timing. A statement about revision plans should be added to the Flow Projection tables on pages 52, 53, 54, and 55 for those who may consult the data but not read the textual material. On a more specific basis the Bloomington 1980 flow was .74 mgd above the Council 's projection but the 1980 flow for the entire Seneca WWTP that serves Bloomington and all or parts of four other cities was only .12 mgd above the projected flow. The 1980 flow figure reported in July 1981 by the MWCC for the Empire WWTP was 3.64 mgd. The figure given on page 86 of the draft Plan (3.45 mgd) will be revised accordingly. The Chanhassen flow projections will be adjusted when the entire system is examined in a couple of years and the city will have an opportunity to become involved in the revisions . The flow projections combine assumptions on levels and types of future development and per capita wastewater generation and are used to project future needs for plant and interceptor facilities to serve the anticipated development. The development assumptions are made as part of the Council Development Framework Plan and the same assumptions are used in everyone of the functional plans including this one for Water Quality Management. When the assumptions are changed the flow projections are revised and the facilities needs are re-examinated. This is anticipated for 1983 or 1984. Recommendation (Page 52) Add a footnote, with references to it also made on pages 53, 54 and 55 that reads like this. "The projections of population and flow will be revised in the 1983-84 period to reflect 1980 census data, acceptable local comprehensive plans, current wastewater flow trends and new flow projection methodology." 6. The Existing Sewer System Comments and Source The City of St. Paul , Office of the Mayor The City believes the Plan puts most of its emphasis on expansion of the system and too little focus on the needs of the existing system. Analysis There is very strong emphasis put on maintenance and repair of the existing system in the policies and text on pages 17 and 23. In the System Plan Section on page 62, the deteriorating condition of the Minneapolis East Interceptor is noted and on page 63 action on this problem is called for. The new insert called for in this paper under the "computer monitoring" heading for page 90 of the Plan is focused on keeping appraised of condi- tions and problems in the existing system. The restoration of metropolitan WWTP rehabilitation projects for page 65 under the "Metro" heading in this paper also focus on keeping the existing system in good shape. - 5 - Recommendation No changes are required. 7. Infiltration/Inflow and Stormwater Comment and Source City of St. Paul , Office of the Mayor The Plan does not make a strong enough commitment towards solving infiltra- tion, inflow and stormwater problems in the metropolitan disposal system. Analysis The MWCC is administering federal funding for local studies dealing with inflow and infiltration problems in the facilities contributing to the metropolitan system. The project will provide for the engineering and construction needs to identify, evaluate and repair I/I problems in the system. I/I problems in the local collection systems must be resolved by the individual governments involved. A Metropolitan-wide approach to handling stormwater runoff will be presented in the surface water management (nonpoint source) portion of the Water Quality Management Policy Plan currently in preparation. Recommendation No changes are required. 8. Specific Sources of Sewage Comment and Source City of Farmington (City Council) The Farmington City Council objects to the unnecessary and illegal demand of the Council for specific sources of sewage and the sequence of develop- ment in the City comprehensive plan which is implied in the 208 draft. Analysis An examination of propsoed amendments to the Water Quality Management Policy Plan failed to turn up any material relevant to the City Council 's concern. Staff members involved with local comprehensive plan review believe this concern is over a former disagreement on the comprehensive plan review process and not on any Water Plan amendment proposals. Recommendation No changes are required. - 6 - 9. Anoka WWTP Comments and Sources The Cities of Andover, Anoka, Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Coon Rapids, Ramsey; the St. Paul Water Utility; the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Andover, Anoka, Brooklyn Park, Champlin and Ramsey call for a phase out of the Anoka WWTP to the CAB interceptor by 1987. The resolutions from these cities indicate support of the 201 study's alternative 31 which in turn gives limited expansion room, possible adverse impact on the Minneapolis and St. Paul water supplies, local opposition to the Plant, less restrictions to future development north and west of Anoka and plant site use as a park as the non-monetary reasons for phase out. The City of Coon Rapids wants the Plant phased out provided the CAB and Minneapolis East Interceptor projects are finished or under construction concurrent with phase out. Their reasons for phase out are protection of the Minneapolis water supply, water recreation uses north of the Coon Rapids Dam and increased flow capacity for growth in the Region. The St. Paul Water Utility wants the Plant phased out and indicates possible need to convert from a sand filter to an activated carbon treatment system if the plant stays and the upper river is classified as vulnerable by the EPA. A cost of 44 million dollars and a 50 percent rise in rates is associated with this action. The MWCC proposes interim improvements to the Plant to serve until the Minneapolis East Interceptor work and the current improvements at the Metropolitan WWTP are completed--not before 1987. Analysis Sewer facilities that can accommodate growth in the northwestern suburban area will be provided either with or without the Anoka WWTP. Swimming and waterskiing could be adversely affected by retention of the Anoka Plant. The strongest rationale for phase out is the threat to the water supplies of St. Paul and Minneapolis. Minneapolis has not commented on the Plan amendment proposals but is reported to be committed to a switch to an activated carbon treatment system. The St. Paul Water Utility statement is couched in terms of possibilities rather than probabilities. It has proven most difficult to obtain current reliable information on the vulnerability classification-water treatment issue. Because of this uncertainty on the water supply issue a revised position is suggested. Existing Metropolitan Council forecasts and the northwest area 201 study indicate that the plant will reach capacity around 1987. A phase-out of the plant would require connecting the Anoka interceptor to the lower segment of the CAB. In order to ensure that sufficient capacity will be available to serve anticipated development during this period, certain interim improvements are needed in order to increase the plant' s treatment capacity. A scheduling of a phase-out in 1987 would require that the project be included in the 1982-86 Development Program by 1985. • - 7 - Recommendation (Page 60) "Service Area Changes" rewrite as: The service area in the early and mid-1980s is to accommodate urban development in Anoka, part of Ramsey and Champlin until the latter is served by the CAB interceptor. The 1980 data includes service to Anoka and to Champlin only. Data is not given for 1990 and 2000 because the eventual status of the plant anticipated to be phased out in the late 1980s ." (Page 60) 1981-84 Period; rewrite as: "The MWCC should include in its 1982-86 Development Program a project for interim improvement of the Plant that will allow it to operate and meet permit requirement." (Page 60) 1985-89 Period; delete existing text and add: "Metropolitan Council population and flow forecasts and the Northwest Area Study indicate that the plant will reach capacity by 1987 requiring its phase-out. Final scheduling of the plant phase-out will require annual monitoring during the 1981-84 period of those conditions (changes to Mississippi River water quality standards, completion of improvements to the Metropolitan Water Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) , and annual rate of use of remaining plant capacity) which will affect the timing of the plant phase-out." 10)Chaska WWTP Comments and Sources The Cities of Chanhassen, Shakopee and Chaska Chanhassen is supportive of an interceptor along the north side of the Minnesota River if the Plant is phased out to the Blue Lake WWTP in the future. Chaska notes its support of the Plan recommendation. Shakopee feels the Chaska Plant should be phased out via an interceptor south of the Minnesota River to the Blue Lake WWTP. This action would allow for service to developments in Jackson Township said to be having pollution problems and may on a long term basis be the best alternative financially due to the interceptor's development potential and need to serve existing subdivisions. Analysis The 201 Study used a 20-year frame of reference in analyzing alternatives for the Chaska WWTP and found that financially, environmentally and development-wise expansion of the Chaska Plant was clearly the best alternative. An interceptor south of the river traverses environmentally and sensitive floodplain land, goes through high quality farmland and could stimulate premature development south of Shakopee in rural land. In the 1970s Shakopee annexed a large area to the east of the old city so it has a good deal of open land for development within its corporate limits. If there are pollution problems in Jackson Township at mobile home courts and/or small subdivisions they should be handled locally through on-site system improvements. - 8 - Recommendation No changes are needed. 11. Empire WWTP Comment and Source Cities of Apple Valley and Lakeville Apple Valley and Lakeville believe the Empire WWTP will be at capacity flow in 1989 rather than 1992 based on their forecasts and those of Farmington. The cities would like the plan to reflect this belief by including Empire expansion in the MWCC's 1982-86 Development Program, with expansion completed by 1990. Analysis New flow projects will be made in 1983/84 and reviewed for their impact on timing of expansion. If these data suggest the Empire WWTP will need to be expanded by 1989, appropriate action will be taken (page 50 of Draft Plan) . Recommendation No change is needed. 12. Maple Plain WWTP Comments and Sources Mr. Dale Trippler, member of 208 Citizens Advisory Committee; Mr. Brad Van Ness, Mayor, City of Orono; MWCC. Mr. Trippler advocates phase out of Maple Plain Plant to the Blue Lake WWTP as an aid to the water quality in Jennings Bay of Lake Minnetonka. Mayor Van Ness favors keeping the Maple Plain Plant in operation provided phosphorus removal is installed, I/I corrected and the operation of the plant is re-examined in 1986. The MWCC believes the long-range possibility of plant expansion should be examined and favors long-term phase out to the Long Lake Pumping Station and Blue Lake. Analysis The effluent from the Maple Plain WWTP traverses several miles of wetland prior to discharge into Jennings Bay. This (natural "cleansing" action combined with new (recommended) phosphorus removal in compliance with the state permit presents very limited risks to the Lake. An interceptor for plant phase out would subject sizable rural tracts to potential urban development pressures. The operations of the plant will be monitored closely to see if lake pollution is being controlled. 7 - 9 - It is anticipated that a new NPDES permit for the Maple Plain WWTP will be issued by MPCA in the late summer or fall of 1981. Should this permit require plan phaseout within the five-year 1982-86 period the phase out should proceed in 1982-83, i .e. , before any investment is made in new phosphorus removal facilities. Recommendations Page 90; the 1981-84 period; add the following phrase before the first sentence: "If the 1981 NPDES permit does not call for plant phase out within the 1982-86 period" etc. , as is. Page 90; the 1981-84 period; add this new paragraph after the first paragraph: "If the 1981 NPDES permit calls for phase out of the plan in the five-year 1982-86 period the MWCC should include provisions for such action in its 1982-1986 Development Program. No new action on treatment process upgrading is to be taken and the phase out should occur early in the 1982- 86 period." 13. Medina WWTP Comments and Source The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission The Commission recommends expansion to 0.20 mgd rather than 0.30 as called for in the plan amendment proposal . Analysis The 0.30 mgd figure is based on a population projection of 3,000 people in the sewered area of Medina by year 2000. For this sewered populuation to be realized all of Medina' s projected 1980-2000 increase must be in the sewered part of Medina plus about 300 additional people. It is not likely that such a highly concentrated settlement pattern will develop in an outer suburb with a large land area. Recommendation Page 88; first sentence in the 1981-84 period; change .0 mgd to .20 mgd. Also change the last sentence in 1981-84 to reflect the capital cost an operation and maintenance cost and operation and maintenance cost associated with .20 mgd and the word "their" is to be "this" (a typo) . 14. Metropolitan WWTP Comment and Source The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission The Commission would like to see two of the projects for upgrading the Metropolitan WWTP that were recommended in the WQM plan of 1979 retained in the amended version. - 10 - Analysis The projects were excluded from the amended WPM Plan because they were under a 1979-80 action period and it was assumed they were already in process. There is no objection to retaining them in the amendment, presumably in the 1981-84 period. Recommendation Page 65; continuation of 1981-84 period; and the following new paragraph: "The MWCC should include the following projects in a Development Program: 1) digital retrofit of existing Metropolitan plant components 2) rehabili- tation of the existing Metropolitan Plant facilities; 15. Savage WWTP Comments and Source City of Bloomington Bloomington is concerned that the flow projections currently being used for the Seneca WWTP are too low and consequently a phase out of the Savage WWTP to the Seneca WWTP will further reduce capacity at Seneca currently available for the cities tied into that plant. The city therefore suggests that short term, i.e. , 2- to 5-year improvements be made to the Savage Plant to allow it to continue to operate until revised development and flow projections can be prepared. Analysis As the analysis on flow projections presented earlier in this examination indicates the overall flow projections to date for the Seneca WWTP are much closer to actual performance than are the projections only for the Bloomington part of the flow. Staff feels however that a delay in the phase out of the Savage Plant for a few years is acceptable, pending some modest interim improvements. Recommendation Page 82; 1981-84 period; revise to read "The MWCC should include in its 1982-86 Development Program a project for interim upgrading and expansion of the Savage WWTP that will allow Savage to operate within standards until the mid-1980s. The Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission will re-evaluate the relative costs of phasing out the Savage Plant to either Seneca or Blue Lake. - 11 - 16. Seneca WWTP Comment and Source City of Bloomington Bloomington would like to see Seneca Plant expansion studies scheduled sooner. 1985-1989 period is suggested, rather than around the turn of the century as called for in the draft plan document. The city's projections of future flow indicate an earlier need for plant expansion. Analysis New development and flow projections will be available by late 1983 or 1984. Should these data indicate the need to revise the timetable for Seneca expansion there will be abundant time to amend the Plan and do the work before a capacity problem is upon us. Delay on Savage Plant phase out also helps on the time aspects. Recommendation No change is required. 17. Stillwater WWTP Comment and Source City of Stillwater Stillwater suggests the Stillwater WWTP be expanded to 4.0 mgd instead of the 3.6 mgd indicated in the draft Plan document. The city believes it should have additional sewer capacity if it is to properly play its role as a freestanding growth center in the future. Analysis Existing flow projections for Stillwater, Oak Park Heights and Bayport indicate a need for 3.32 mgd plant capacity by 2000 so the 3.6 mgd should provide a good cushion for development in exceess of that assumed in the projections. The unit flow existing and projected for the City of Stillwater is one of the two or three highest in the Metropolitan Area with much of it attributable to conveyance of water from springs going into the sanitary sewer lines and to the WWTP. Storm sewer separation in the city could make a considerable amount of additional capacity available in the Plant for further development. Recommendation No change is required. - 12 - 18. Blaine Interceptor Comment and Source Cities of Blaine and Mounds View Blaine strongly favors including the Blaine-Ham Lake Interceptor in the 1981-84 Development Program. Mounds View would like to see a new Blaine Interceptor take the routing identified as Alternative No. 2 in the 201 Plan as this route avoids going through wetlands and Greenfield Park. Analysis The interceptor proposed in this plan amendment is intended to ultimately serve all of central Blaine within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. There is no provision for service beyond the MUSA into Ham Lake where urban development is discouraged. The 201 Plan favors Alternative No. 2 as the route for a new Blaine Inter- ceptor as does the City of Mounds View. The draft plan document does not specify any particular routing but the policy discussion on page 14 of the draft supports Mounds View's position of avoiding wetlands where possible. Recommendations Page 63 of the draft Plan; second to last paragraph on the page. Add a new sentence following the third sentence to read "the routing included as a part of Alternative No. 2 in the 201 is preferred." 19. CAB Interceptor Comments and Sources The Cities of Andover, Anoka, Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Coon Rapids and Ramsey; the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Andover, Anoka, Brooklyn Park, Champlin and Ramsey passed a common resolution that calls for the full CAB, including the river crossing to Anoka, to be constructed in the 1981-84 period. The cities ask that the Development Program and capital budget reflect this resolution. They also ask that the draft Plan be revised to reflect adding the flows from northern Brookyn Park and from the other four cities (Andover, Anoka, Champlin and Ramsey) to the Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant in the service area data and the flow tables. The City of Coon Rapids supports construction of the full CAB provided the Minneapolis East Interceptor is enlarged prior to or simultaneously with the construction of CAB and phase out of the Anoka WWTP. The MWCC supports construction of the full CAB interceptor but does not want the river connection to Anoka until the Minneapolis East dry weather flow problems are corrected and current construction at the Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant is finished, not before 1987. - 13 - Analysis The draft Plan differs with the above comments only with respect to building the CAB river connection that would result in a phase out of the Anoka WWTP and the addition of the flows from Anoka, some of Ramsey and a very limited part of Andover to the Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant. The discussion on the Anoka WWTP suggests a change be made in the draft Plan to allow interim improvements that would allow the Anoka Plant to operate until 1987 or somewhat after. The long-term fate of the Anoka Plant and thus of the full or upper CAB cannot be made until additional information about the plant' s impact on the St. Paul and Minneapolis drinking water systems can be made. Recommendation Page 63 of the draft Plan document; last paragraph; Add two new sentences after the third sentence that read "A decision on the Anoka River crossing, C-15 in the 201 Plan, will be made when the impact of an expanded Anoka WWTP on the St. Paul and Minneapolis drinking water system has been determined. This will be made during the 1981-84 period." 20. Lake Ann Phase II Interceptor Comment and Source The City of Chanhassen Chanhassen requested that the proposed Lake Ann Phase II Interceptor be designed in a manner that considers the enviromental needs and cost considerations of the city and the Metropolitan Area. Analysis The Chanhassen letter was not clear as to whether the city has any specific concerns in mind. On a general map of proposed location it appears the interceptor will pass very near to Lake Minnewasta Regional Park. This proximity calls for close coordination between the city and the MWCC as noted on page 80 of the draft Plan under the 1981-84 period. Recommendation No change is needed. The MWCC is urged to work closely with local officials in any locality where they have projects proposed or underway. 21. Lino Lakes Interceptor Comment and Source The City of Lino Lakes Lino Lakes requests the extension of MWCC interceptor (4NS-523) 3,000 feet into Lino Lakes. - 14 - Analysis Provided the Lino Lakes comprehensive plan reflects the need for this extension and is overall acceptable there is no problem with providing the requested extension. The city understands and accepts the fact that money will not be available for this project for about three years. Recommendation Page 65; 1981-84 period; add new paragraph after the first paragraph that reads "the MWCC should include in its 1981-86 Development Program a project for a 3,000 foot extension of Interceptor 4NS-523 into Lino Lakes provided the Lino Lakes comprehensive plan reflects the need for this facility and has been found acceptable by the Metropolitan Council ." 22. Ramsey Second Interceptor Connection Comment and Source The Cities of Anoka, Brooklyn Park, Champlin and Ramsey; the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission The resolution from the four cities calls for a second or east interceptor from Ramsey to Anoka once the Anoka WWTP has been phased out and the City of Ramsey is ready for the connection. The MWCC makes no specific comment on the Ramsey east connection but by its support of 201 Alternative 31 which includes the Ramsey project the Commission can be assumed to do so likewise. Analysis Page 57 of the 1979 adopted Water Quality Management Plan; 1981-84 period, second sentence calls for construction on the second connection to Ramsey in accordance with the timing outlined in the appoved comprehensive plans of Ramsey and Anoka. This was inadvertently deleted from the draft Plan Amendment document of May 1981. The Ramsey east connection will not add a very large additional flow to the Anoka WWTP and could be built once the interim plant improvements have been made provided the comprehensive plans are in order and a need exists. Construction does not depend on either a phase out of the Anoka WWTP to CAB or prior construction of an addition to the Plant's current designed capacity. Recommendation Page 60 of the draft Plan document (May 1981) ; 1981-84 Period; Add a second paragraph that reads "the MWCC should include in its 1982-86 Development Program a project to add a second or east interceptor connection to Ramsey provided a need exists and Ramsey has an acceptable (to the Council) comprehensive plan that includes this interceptor." - 15 - 23. Savage Intercetpor Comment and Source The City of Burnsville Burnsville would like the interceptor built to phase out the Savage WWTP to the Seneca WWTP to be a gravity sewer that could also provide additional capacity to southwest Burnsville and eliminate the need to construct both a new lateral and new trunkline. Analysis The cost effectiveness of phasing out the Savage Plant to either the Seneca or Blue Lake Plants is closely tied to the question of which of these two plants will require expansion first. Revised population and flow figures should be available for evaluation prior to making a firm decision on expansion. Recommendation No change is needed. SE4842 8.26.81 SHAKOPEE SENIOR MULTIPURPOSE CENTER POLICY AND GUIDELINES/RESERVATION SHEET 1 . The use of the space is to be exclusively by Senior Citizens and all residents of the apartments . Any proposed use for the facility which is questionable in regard to this Policy will be brought before the Task Force for resolution. If not re- solved by the Task Force, the City Council will make a final decision 2 . Any reservation for use of the facility will be coordinated through the Site Manager of the Congregate Dining Program. 3 . Subject to Policy #1 , the Senior Citizen Club and the Congre- gate Dining Program shall be considered regular users and shall receive priority in establishing and reserving time for use of the Facility at their regular meeting times . 4. The City will have the ultimate responsibility for the condi- tion of the Facilities , however the City may designate others to be responsible for the Facility and those persons may fur- ther designate individuals or groups to be responsible . 5 . A $25 .00 deposit is required by non-regular users when reserv- ing the Facility. Nonexclusive use of the area shall have no charge . 6 . Taking responsibility includes the following items : A. The area must be clean before leaving B. All lights must be turned off C . All appliances must be turned off and cleaned D. Furniture is to be replaced to its ' original position E. All doors must be locked F. No liquor G. Children must be kept under control H. No activities shall be carried on between 10:00 p.m. and 6 :00 a.m. I . Any maintenance or mechanical problems are to be reported immediately to the appropriate City Official at 445-3650. 7 . Children (18 years old and under) are not to be outside the Community Room unless accompanied by one of the signers on this sheet . Use of the Restrooms is not restricted, however children must not use this as an excuse to play in the halls and restrooms . If any complaints are received the deposit will not be returned. Policy and Guidelines/Reservation Sheet Page 2 8. The kitchen facility is only to be used by regular users speci- fied in #3 above. 9. There must be two (2) people responsible for the Facility. Both must sign this sheet and must agree to be responsible for all Rules and Regulations . Congregate Dining Site Representative Responsible Persons Draft : 8-3-81 { i i , Lav Offices of KRASS, MEYER & KANNING Chartered Phillip R. Krass Shakopee Professional Building September 1 , 1 981 Barry K. Meyer 1221 Fourth Avenue East Philip T. Kanning Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Trevor R. Walsten (612)445-5080 The Honorable Tom Rees Minnesota State House of Representatives Room 365 State Capitol St. Paul , Minnesota 55155 Re: City of Shakopee - Fiscal Disparity Challenge Dear Representative Rees: As you may know, the City of Shakopee is presently pursuing its challenge of the Fiscal Disparities Law to the Minnesota Supreme Court. Our brief is being filed this month and will point out several of the Constitutional deficiencies we see in the Fiscal Disparities Law. We have some concern that the Office of the Attorney General , or the Metropolitan Council , which is also a party to this appeal , or some non- governmental entity such as the Citizens League, may attempt to recitfy these deficiencies by proposing amendments to the Fiscal Disparities Law to try and make it more Constitutionally acceptable. At this stage, it is our desire to proceed with the appeal on the basis of the Law as it exists now. Consequently, it is vital that we know if there is any attempt of any nature to try and fine tune this Law. Its proper name is METROPOLITAN FISCAL DISPARITIES ACT. It was passed in the extra session of 1971 as Chapter 24, and is codified in Minnesota Statutes as Chapter 473F. If you and your staff will keep a close lookout for any attempt to modify the Fiscal Disparities Law and keep us informed, we would be most grateful . Thank you for your assistance. Yours very truly, KRASS, MEYER & KANNING CHARTERED Phillip R. Krass PRK:skm cc: Mr. John Anderson City Administrator 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Law Offices of KRASS, MEYER & KANNING Chartered Phillip R. Kress Shakopee Professional Building September 1 , 1 981 Barry K. Meyer 1221 Fourth Avenue East Philip T. Kenning Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Trevor R. Wa!sten (612)445-5080 The Honorable Robert J. Schmitz RECEIVED Senator, District 36 235 Capitol St. Paul , Minnesota 55155 SEP 2 1931 Re: City of Shakopee - Fiscal Disparity Challenge CITY OF SHAKOPEE Dear Senator Schmitz: As you may know, the City of Shakopee is presently pursuing its challenge of the Fiscal Disparities Law to the Minnesota Supreme Court. Our brief is being filed this month and will point out several of the Constitutional deficiencies we see in the Fiscal Disparities Law. We have some concern that the Office of the Attorney General , or the Metropolitan Council , which is also a party to this appeal , or some non- governmental entity such as the Citizens League, may attempt to recitfy these deficiencies by proposing amendments to the Fiscal Disparities Law to try and make it more Constitutionally acceptable. At this stage, it is our desire to proceed with the appeal on the basis of the Law as it exists now. Consequently, it is vital that we know if there is any attempt of any nature to try and fine tune this Law. Its proper name is METROPOLITAN FISCAL DISPARITIES ACT. It was passed in the extra session of 1971 as Chapter 24, and is codified in Minnesota Statutes as Chapter 473F. If you and your staff will keep a close lookout for any attempt to modify the Fiscal Disparities Law and keep us informed, we would be most grateful . Thank you for your assistance. Yours very truly, KRASS, MEYER & KANNING CHARTERED Phillip R. Krass PRK:skm cc: Mr. John Anderson City Administrator 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 RECEIVED /o SEP 21961 2%21111.-- CITY -CITY OF SHAKOPEE St.Francis Hospital 325 WEST FIFTH AVENUE/SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA 55379/(612)445-2322 September 1 , 1981 Mr. John K. Anderson City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mr. Anderson, On behalf of St. Francis Hospital 's Board of Directors and staff I would like to thank the City for their donation of $ 527.81 , proceeds from the sale of the 1970 ambulance, toward our recently purchased Advanced Life Support Ambulance. The hospital operates two fully-equipped ALS units and paramedics are staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week. We feel we offer a high quality service to the citizens of Shakopee and the sur- rounding area. As you know, ambulance services are very costly to operate and your donation helps the hospital continue to provide this vital community service. Thanks again for your support. Sincerely, / gnes Off) Sister Otting Executive Director SAO:Hme cc: Jeanne Andre SPONSORED BY THE FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF ST. PAUL, MN BILL FRENZEL DISTRICT OFFICES: THIRD DISTRICT.MINNESOTA MAYBETH CHRISTENSEN 180 FEDERAL BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS 55401 WASHINGTON OFFICE: 1026 LONGWORTH BUILDING Congrell of the Einiteb *tote 612-725-2173 202-225-2871 IRIS SAUNDERSON 3601 PARK CENTER 3ou5e of 3epreOentatibel BOULEVARD ST.LOUIS PARK 554166A RD 612-925-4540 attingtotn, O.C. 20515 August 31, 1981 RECEIVED SEP 3 1981 Mr. John K. Anderson City Administrator City of Shakopee CITY OF S}�AK0 129 E. First Avenue PEE Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Mr. Anderson: Thank you for contacting my office regarding the possibility that the Congress might restrict the use of small issue Industrial Development Bonds (IDB's). As you know, the Oversight Subcommittee of the Committee on Ways and Means has been looking at several proposals which would restrict the use of IDB's. Proposals which would limit the use of IDB's for commercial uses, while leaving their industrial applications alone, have been generating the most interest. Fortunately, it now appears that this issue has been put on the back burner for this Session of Congress. After carefully considering all of the information available on the use of small issue IDB's, the Ways and Means Committee has decided to delay any action in this area until after work on the President's economic package has been completed. This will give us more time to consider more possible solutions to eliminate the alleged abuses of IDB's, as well as to more carefully consider the impact of any actions the Congress might take. Thanks, again, for providing me with the benefit of your views on this important issue. Yours very truly, Bill Frenzel Member of Congress BF:dbr THIS STATIONERY PRINTED ON PAPER MADE WITH RECYCLED FIBERS SHAKOPEE CITY AD HOC DOWNTOWN CONLMITTEE MEETING September 3, 1981 7:00 A.M. City Council. Chambers Present: Dan Steil, Terry Link, Nancy Christensen, Bill Wermerskircken, Jr., Don Martin, Fred Corrigan, Don Steger, Gene Pearson, Dick Hullander, Joe Topic, Lee Stoltzman, and John Anderson. Chairman Dan Steil called the meeting to order at 7:04 A.M. Link/Corrigan moved to approve the minutes of August 20, 1981 meeting. Motion carried unanimously. • It was reported that Ruben Ruehle would not be interested in joining the committee at the present time. The name of Wallace Kopisca was offered as a replacement to Kay Benson. Dan Steil would contact him. Don Steger briefed the committee on the two consultanting firms present- ations conducted at the last meeting and also on the Westwood Planning & Engineering Company's proposal which was given to committee members prior to the meeting. Discussion was held on the committee's next approach to where we go from here . Hullander suggested that presentations be made to the City Council, Chamber of Commerce, and the I.C.C. Dan Steil suggested that the first step might be to contact the owners of business properties for both interested and financial support. It was decided that the Committee, which is actually a part of the I.C.C., first present their outline to that group. This was scheduled for September 9, 1981 at 5:00 P.M. It was also decided that the following items could be given immediate consideration: 1. To place all utilities along a section of Second Avenue underground. This basically would consist of a three block section of the down- town business area. 2. Placing a no-parking restriction on a portion of the North side of First Avenue. Negotiations could be held on which blocks should be considered. 3. Negotiating with the State Highway Department on the possibility of them purchasing the Northeast corner of First Avenue and Holmes Street for the use of a right-hand turn lane. 4. To persuade the extension of Levee Drive eastward. After the presentation to the I.G.C., it was recommended that the business area be Informed of the projections. Presentation to the City Council was scheduled for September 29, 1981. Rod Krass would be invited to the next meeting to discuss establishing a Port Authority. The next meeting of the committee is scheduled for September 17, 1981 at 7:00 A.M. at the City Council Chambers . The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 A.M. Submitted by Don Martin /3 PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS Regular Session Shakopee, Minnesota August 13, 1981 Chrmn. Schmitt called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. with Comm. Coller, Rockne, Stoltzman and Perusich present. Absent: Comm. Vierling and Koehnen. Also present: City Planner, Don Steger and City Admin. , John Anderson and Cncl. Leroux. Coller/Stoltzman moved to approve the minutes of July 9, 1981 ,. as typed. Motion carried with Comm. Rockne abstaining (not present at 7/9/81 meeting). Radermacher Variances Public Hearing - PC 81-22V: Perusich/Rockne moved to open the public hearing on the request for a 3 foot 6 inch variance from side yard setback requirements and a 2 foot 6 inch variance from rear yard setback requirements, for placement of a garage. Motion carried unanimously. City Planner explained the request for the variances. He stated that staff is recommending approval of the variance requests. John Radermacher, 140 West 3rd Avenue, applicant, was present to answer any questions. Chrmn. Schmitt asked for comments from the audience. There were none. Chrmn. Schmitt read letters voicing no objection to the proposed variances from James Raduenz, Ray Siebenaler, Elmer Dahl, William Noto, John Ries , Sr. , Norbert Nagel and F. F. Schneider. Coller/Perusich moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Rockne/Coller offered Variance Resolution No. 281, granting a 3 foot 6 inch side yard and a 2 foot 6 inch rear yard setback from variance requirements, currently on City Ordinance, and moved for its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Coller/Stoltzman moved to recess to the Planning Commission meeting until the 7:45 P.M. Board of Adjustment & Appeals public hearing. Motion carried 1 unanimously. Recess at 7:40 P.M. Coller/Perusich moved to reconvene the meeting of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals at 7:45 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Bergstad Variances (Senior Citizen Highrise) Public Hearing - PC 81-21V: Coller/Stoltzman moved to open the public hearing on the request for a 2 foot 4 inch variance from rear yard setback requirements to bring an existing structure into compliance with Shakopee City Code. Motion carried unanimously. Proceedings of the August 13, 1981 Board of Adjustment & Appeals Page -2- ) 3 City Planner stated the applicant is John Bergstad, 200 Levee Drive Association, who is requesting the variance for the existing Senior Citizen Highrise. He stated that on October 2, 1979, the City Council granted three variances for the highrise, one of which was a 12 foot 4 inch variance from the rear yard requirments. This action allowed the highrise building to be placed 17 feet 8 inches from the rear lot line. It has now been determined that the building was actually constructed 15 feet 4 inches from the property line, therefore, prompting this 2 foot 4 inch variance request. He stated that the error had not been caught during the construction of the building but when the as-builts had been closer examined . He stated that staff is reluctantly recommending approval; reluctantly because he does not want to start a precedent by a decision of approval, and to keep the structure in non-compliance would not be beneficial to anyone, and to move the building would be impractical. Chrmn. Schmitt questioned Cncl. Leroux whether the City couldn't use a transit to prevent this situation from occurring. He continued to state that this situation has occurred in the past and thinks the City is partly responsible because the City should have surveying equipment to recheck surveying done by the developer's contractors. Discussion was held. Chrmn. Schmitt asked for comments from the audience. John Bergstad, applicant, stated the error had been discovered at the time of a closing. He stated it was a draftsman's error. Victor Knutsen, Design Architect, was present and stated it was his responsibility but the building had been constructed from the drawings so it was no fault of the contractor. The drawings had been designed inaccurately. It should of been caught on the site plan, but was not. Rockne/Perusich moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Coller/Rdckne offered Variance Resolution No. 280, to reluctantly grant the requested 2 foot 4 inch variance from rear yard setback requirements for an existing structure located at 200 Levee Drive but with consideration given that this error was brought to the attention of the City by the applicant, and moved for its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Coller/Perusich moved to have staff consider some alternatives to address this issue and that it be further discussed at the September 10th Board of Adjustment and Appeals meeting; issues - how to avoid this from happening again, cost in having City staff conduct surveying and any deterrent methods to prevent unauthorized variances by contractors. Motion carried unanimously. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals requested that the City Building Inspector be present when this issue is further discussed and that City staff contact other communities to see if they have undergone similar situations and their solution. Perusich/Stoltzman moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8:00 P.M. "Don Steger City Planner Jane Wostrel Recording Secretary Iv PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Session Shakopee, Minnesota August 13, 1981 The Board of Adjustment and Appeal recessed to the Planning Cmmission meeting at 7:10 P.M. with Chrmn. Schmitt calling the meeting to order and Comm. Perusich, Stoltzman, Coller and Rockne present. Absent: Comm. Vierling and Koehnen. Also present: Don Steger, City Planner and John Anderson, City Administrator. The City Planner reported to the Planning Commission on the appeal to the City Council from the Board of Adjustment and Appeals decision on the Link variances. He stated at the July 9, 1981 Board of Adjustment and Appeals meeting, the Board had granted a 5 foot variance from front yard setback requirements off of 10th Ave. , a 8 foot variance from front yard setback requirements off of County Road 17 and a 12 foot variance from rear yard setback requirements, for construction of a 12- unit Condominium Project to be located East of County Road 17 and North of 10th Avenue. A number u.' citizens had appealed this decision and the appeal had been heard by the Council at their August 1+, 1981 meeting, at which time the Council upheld the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. City Plap.ner informed the Planning Commission that the questions which should have been submitted to him by August 10, 1981 from the 1+-person Citizen Committee on the request for a Conditional Use and Mining Permit had not been received by him. He also stated that he has received no work from any of the members of this Committee. Coller/Perusich moved to recess back to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals meeting at 7:1+5 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Coller/P&rusich moved to reconvene the Planning Commission meeting at 8:00 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Coller/Stoltzman moved to approve the minutes of July 9th, with the correction on Page 5, last paragraph to read, "every 1.8 minutes in a 12 hour day . . , ," Motion carried with Comm. Rockne abstaining due to his absence at that meeting. Rockne/Coller moved to approve the minutes of July 23, 1981, as typed. Motion carried unanimously. Rezoning (So. of Highway 101, E of Shakopee) Public Hearing: (PC 81-27R): Stoltzman/Coller moved to open the public hearing on the rezoning of parcels of properties located in eastern Shakopee and south of Highway 101 from I-2 (Heavy Industrial) to B-1 (Highway Business). Motion carried unanimously. City Planner stated the applicant is the City of Shakopee and this rezoning request was initiated by the request of Don Woodward to rezone a parcel lying in the midst of these parcels zoned I-2. The City Council had moved its approval to Mr. Woodward's rezoning request, contingent upon the rezoning of the following parcels: Proceedings of the August 13, 1981 Shakopee Planning Commission Page -2- / 1( Cretex Industrial Park 1st Addition - Lots 1-3, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 3 Howe 1st Addition - Lot 1, Block 1 Case 1st Addition - Lot 1, Block 1 Tobco, Inc. , - a 5.17 acre parcel in Section 2-115-22 Landey's Camping Center - 1 5.8 acre parcel in Section 3-115-22 A 6.,2 acre parcel in Section 3-115-22; fee owner: Darwin Hentz; Contract for Deed: Rosemarie Gearman These parcels would be rezoned from I-2 to B-1. He further stated that since Shakopee has very few B-1 zoned parcels and since much of these properties have already developed highway business land uses and because it had been brought to his attention that perhaps this was an oversite at the time of the Zoning Ordinance change and should have been zoned B-1, staff is recommending rezoning of these parcels. City Planner further stated a potential conflict does exist with the trunk watermain project and assessments which are now being conducted for benefitted properties. Shakopee Public Utilities has assessed the Howe property at the industrial assessment rate, and if this parcel were rezoned to Highway Business, it would lower the assessments for the Howe parcel. He added that should this be the case, the monetary difference would then have to come from the SPUC Contingency Fund. Chrmn. SIhmitt asked for comments from the audience. Don Woodward stated that letters had been written to all the property owners of the involved parcels requesting any objections to the proposed rezoning and no comments had been received to date from any of the affected owners, other than approval from Landey's Camping Center. Robert Budd, Landey's Camping Center, stated they are definitely for the rezoning because this would give them more flexibility. He further stated that when Landey's.Camping Center had entered into a contract agreement with Mr. Hentz, this parcel was zoned B-l. City Planner then stated that a signed rezoning request had been received from Bill Howe of Howe, Inc. ; Charles Gallagher of the Cretex Companies; Jerome Scherber of Tobco, Inc. ; Donald Budd of Landey's Camping Center; the President of Family Dining and Rosemarie Gearman. Coller/Perusich moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Coller/Rockne moved to recommend to the City Council the rezoning of: Cretex Industrial Park 1st Addition, Lots 1-3, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 3; Howe 1st Addition, Lot 1, Block 1; Case 1st Addition, Lot 1, Block 1; Tobco Inc. - a 5.17 acre parcel in Section 2-115-22; Landey's Camping Center - a 5.8 acre parcel in Section 3-115-22; A 6.2 acre parcel in Section 3-115-22, CD: Rosemarie Gearman. Before the vote was taken, Comm. Rockne questioned why Raceway Park and the Pearson property were not included in this rezoning. City Planner stated these parcels were not affected because they are appropriately zoned as I-2. 1 't Official Proceedings of the August 13, 1981 Shakopee Planning Commission Page -3- Motion was then carried unanimously on the recommended rezonings. Nor-Dean 1st Addition: (PC 81-23P) Perusich/Stoltzman moved to open the public hearing on the Preliminary and Final Plat of Nor-Dean 1st Addition (lot split) . Motion carried unanimously. City Planner stated this is a request for a simple lot split in the Scenic Heights 3rd Addition, located at 1522 - 1528 East 10th Avenue. These are currently being used as rental duplexes but the owners desire to turn them into saleable twin homes. He stated staff is recommending approval subject to conditions. Chrmn. Schmitt asked for comments from the audience. There were none. Chrmn. Schmitt asked if the Duplex owner and applicant had been notified of staff's recommended conditions and if he had any objections. There were none. Coller/Perusich moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Coller/Rockne moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat of Nor-Dean 1st Addition, subject to the following conditions, as was recommended by staff: 1. The 10-foot drainage and utility easement along the west property line of Lot 1 be included in the hardshell; 2. An easement for water and sewer service be granted to Lot 1 and a Mainten- ance Agreement be provided prior to recording the plat; 3. The agreement covering exterior maintenance be submitted to City staff for review and approval prior to recording of the plat; 4. The gignature block be corrected to conform with the Subdivision Regulations of the Shakopee City Code. Motion carried unanimously. Nor-Dean 2nd Addition: (PC 81-24P) - Coller/Stoltzman moved to open the public hearing on the Preliminary and Final Plat of Nor-Dean 2nd Addition. Motion carried unanimously. City Planner stated this is a request for a simple lot split again in the Scenic Heights 3rd Addition. These are also rental duplex units located at 1064-1076 Sibley. The owners desire to turn this duplex into saleable twin homes. Staff is recommending approval with conditions. Chrmn. Schmitt asked for comments from the audience. There were none. Coller/Rockne moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Rockne/Stoltzman moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat of Nor-Dean 2nd Addition, subject to the following staff recommended conditions: Proceedings of the August 13, 1981 Shakopee Planning Commission Page -4- 1. The agreement covering exterior maintenance be submitted to City staff for review and approval prior to recording the plat; 2. The signature block be corrected to conform with the Shakopee Subdivision Regulations; 3. An easement for the sidewalk and utilities along the west property lines of the lots be included on the hardshell; 4. An easement for water and sewer service be provided between Lot 1 and Lot 2 and a Maintenance Agreement be provided prior to recording the plat. Motion carried unanimously. Armstron: Conditional Use Permit Public Hearin.: (PC 81-25C) Coller/Perusich moved to open the public hearing on the request for a Conditional Use Permit for a professional office as a home occupation for the practice of kinlein in an R-2 (Residential) Zone. Motion carried unanimously.- City Planner stated the applicant is Marcia Armstrong and the home occupation is to be located at 1043 Main Street. He stated that the applicant desires to use one room in the lower level of this residence for a professional operation. He stated that since only one client will be visiting the office at a time, parking in the driveway would be sufficient. He stated there would be no exterior indication of the business on the property and could see no adverse affect ort neighboring properties. He stated staff is recommending approval subject to condition. Marcia Armstrong, applicant, was present for discussion. She stated she anticipates seeing between 1 to 5 clients per week. She said her office hours would have to be flexible since the client is the one who needs to remain in control and this has to be done at the wishes of the client. She is requesting open-end hours of operation. She then explained the practice of kinlein by stating that it began 10 years ago from the practice of nursing. She stated kinlein ins a practice to help people stay in control and act as a self-care agency. The practice assists people in recognizing what is best for them without someone else making the decision for them. She further added it cannot be characterized as a health care center but looks at the positive mental side of what a client is doing with an issue. Chrmn. Schmitt asked for questions from the audience. Phyllis Berg questioned the age limits of this practice. Chrmn. Schmitt read a letter voicing opposition from Wayne and Marilyn Jacobsen due to potential traffic increase and stated they preferred keeping this area solely residential. Discussion held. Comm. Coller stated that based on the application he could not see an increase in traffic due to this requested home occupation. Coller/Perusich moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. / 4 Proceedings of the August 13, 1981 Shakopee Planning Commission Page -25- Coller/Rockne offered Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 282, the granting of a home occupation for the practice of kinlein, subject to the following conditions, as recommended by staff: 1. Conditional Use Permit be reviewed in one years time; 2. Any changes in the business as proposed will require a new Conditional Use Permit. Motion carried with Chrmn. Schmitt abstaining due to conflict of interest. Fenske Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing: (PC 81-28C) Coller/Stoltzman moved to open the public hearing on the request for a Conditional Use Permit for a dance studio as a home occupation in an R-2 zone. Motion carried un«nimously. City Planner stated the applicant is Sharon Fenske, 642 Adams who is requesting this dance studio in the basement of her home. He stated the applicant will be the only employee and is proposing to operate the studio on Tuesday through Friday for about 2-3 hours each day having no more than 8 students enrolled per class; total of 50 students. There will be no exterior signage. He stated the traffic could be a potential problem, but the applicant intends to handle the parking situation by her driveway which can park several cars and has received a letter of permission from the State of Minnesota Correctional Facilities to use their property ;directly across Adams Street for use as a temporary parking solution. He further added that because the applicant is proposing to have the classes spaced a half hour apart, this might relieve some of the traffic pressures. He stated that staff is recommending approval with conditions. Comm. Coller questioned clarification of the letter from the State of Minnesota Correctional Facilities to Sharon Fenske. He stated he was not getting the impression the letter was giving permission to park but rather permission to use their land as a drop-off/pick-up situation. He stated that with one class ending and another class starting, the traffic could be a real problem. The letter was clarified to agree with the impression of Comm. Coller. Comm. Rockne stated he felt the applicant was handling the parking and traffic situation very well with the staggering of hours. Chrmn. Schmitt questioned women's classes, which are also being proposed as a part of this home occupation Conditional Use Permit. He stated this issue should be addressed as this would create a traffic/parking problem. Sharon Fenske stated she would have no more women in her classess than what her driveway could handle, and that being six cars. She stated that for all classes, car pooling would be encouraged and if her enrollment went beyond 50 students, she would then go into a commercial building and it would then cease to be a home occupation. Discussion was held on the length of her driveway on which cars could be parked. The Commission stated there would be approximately 69 feet from the roadway to the house. / ,/ Proceedings of the August 13, 1981 Shakopee Planning Commission Page -6- Chrmn. Schmitt asked for questions from the audience. There were none. Perusich/Rockne moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Perusich/Stoltzman offered Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 284, granting of a home_occupation for a dance studio in an R-2 (Urban Residential) zone to be located at 642 Adams, subject to the following conditions, as recommended by staff: 1. Conditional Use Permit be reviewed within six months of commencing operation; 2. Any changes in the operation of the dance studio as proposed, will require a new Conditional Use Permit. Motion carried unanimously. Hennen Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing: (PC 81-26C) Coller/Perusich moved to open the public hearing on the request for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a motor fuel/service station in a B-1 (Highway Business) zone. Motion carried unanimously. City Planner stated the applicants as Jerome and John Hennen for a fuel/service station to be located at 807 East 1st Avenue which had been a fuel station at one time, but had since been used for other commercial businesses. He stated that because the property was previously used as a fuel/service station, all necessary components remain intact with only a few improvements being planned (i.e. pump island on the west side of the building and the installation of pumps). He further stated that parking of vehicles will be accommodated at the east side and rear of the building. The rear of the building is not hard surfaced but contains crushed rock and if this side of the building were to be used frequently, control of dust may be necessary, although this could be monitored by City staff. He also stated that Minnesota Street north of 1st Avenue was also not 'hard surfaced and this could cause a dust problem due to potential increase -in traffic generated by the proposed self-service fuel pumps to be located on the west side of the building. He stated that the Planning Commission did have the alternative to suggest City Council direct City staff to initiate dust control measures on this portion of Minnesota Street as a solution. He added that staff is recommending approval subject to conditions. Comm. Stoltzman asked when the proposed move would take place. Applicants replied by October 1, 1981. Comm. Coller questioned if the underground tanks had been checked out for safety. He was informed by the applicants that the tanks will be checked out prior to occupancy. Chrmn. Schmitt questioned the feasibility of closing the curb cut to the west along 1st Avenue to force traffic out to the stop sign. He stated this would then allow for at least a little traffic control. Discussion was held. Chrmn. Schmitt asked for questions from the audience. There were none. Proceedings of the August 13, 1981 Shakopee Planning Commission Page -7- Coller/Stoltzman moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Coller/Stoltzman offered Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 283, the granting of a motor fuel/service station in a B-1 (Highway Business) Zone, subject to the following conditions: 1. Any dew lighting to be directed away from adjoining residences; 2. Dust be controlled at the rear of the building in a manner approved by the City Engineer if determined to be necessary by City staff in the future; 3. No exterior storage of trash, car parts, etc. , be allowed; 4. Two trees be planted in the sod area along the west side of the property as approved by the City Planner (ornamental and not for screening purposes) , in lieu of screening requirements. Motion carried unanimously. Change of Meeting Nights: City Planner stated that the City Admin. was asking for discussion and recommendation on the changing of the Planning Commission's scheduled meeting nights in order to provide for faster, more efficient follow-up time on items needing action from the City Council and also to aid staff in the preparation of both City Council and Planning Commission agenda packets, since there were times when these two agenda pickets doubled up. He stated that the first Monday after the first Tuesday would be the recommended choice of City staff. Cncl. Leroux suggested changing Planning Commission meetings to the first Thursday of the month. Discussion was held. City Admin. suggested the first Thursday after the first Tuesday of the month. This change would then solve the follow-up problem, although perhaps not the dual agenda problem. Further discussion took place. Rockne/Culler moved to change the Planning Commission scheduled meeting dates to the first Thursday after the first Tuesday, effective in January of 1982. Rockne/Coller moved to amend the motion to include the third Thursday after the third Tuesday if a need exists for two Planning Commission meetings per month, effective January 1982. Motion carried unanimously. Motion carried unanimously on the main motion as amended. Rosenwinkel Mining and Conditional Use Permit Request (PC 81-18C Howard Rosenwinkel was present for discussion regarding the lack of questions on his request for a Conditional Use Permit and Mining Permit. He stated he is coming before the Planning Commission to ask for any information or questions which were available regarding these requested permits, as the deadline had been August 10th for the Citizens Committee to submit their questions. Proceedings of the August 13, 1981 Shakopee Planning Commission Page -8- Chrmn. Schmitt asked if any questions had been drafted by the Planning Commission. Comm. Coller stated he had agreed to act as coordinator for these questions and had received no questions from anyone. Comm. Perusich stated he preferred to see a list of concerns from the 4-Man Citizen Committee before the Planning Commission would make response. City Planner stated that the lack of input from the 4-Man Citizen Committee was putting the Planning Commission in a bad spot and making it very difficult for Mr. Rosenwinkel to respond to any concerns in time for the continuation of the public hearing in October. Chrmn. Schmitt stated that since the deadline of August 10, 1981, had passed without participation from the Citizens Committee, who were well aware of this deadline date, the Planning Commission should now submit their concerns to Comm. Coller by August 18th and City staff should so notify the absent Planning Commission members of this deadline date. He added that the citizens group would now have to wait until the continuation of the public hearing in October to get Planning Commission and/or applicant response to any of their concerns. He further suggested that guidelines be set up for this October meeting whereby the July 9th minutes would be made available to the public as well as the Planning,Commission in order to prevent the same questions and concerns being repeated`in October which were answered in July. Chrmn. Schmitt directed the City Planner to write a letter to the 4-Man Citizens Committee noting the disappointment of the Planning Commission in their failure to submit their concerns by the August 10th deadline. Cncl. Leroux reported that the considerations of the Planning Commission on the traffic problem in the Minnesota Valley Mall area had been noted by the Council. Chrmn. Schmitt suggested a meeting be set up with Shakopee Public Utilities Manager and the City Engineer in order to come up with separate utilities for Twin Homes. He asked the City Planner to take a look at the utility facilities in the twin home which is for sale in Eastview 1st Addition. Comm. Coller questioned how long the mobile home which had been used as a temporary facility for the Citizens State Bank would remain at the banks temporary location now that the bank had been constructed. Coller/Rockne moved to adjourn. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 10:30 P.M. Don Steger City Planner Jane Wostrel Recording Secretary • - ROBERT J.DOLE,KANS..CHAIRMAN / BOB PACKWOOD,OREG. RUSSELL B.LONG.LA. WILLIAM V.ROTH,JR.,DEL. HARRY F.BYRD,JR.,VA. JOHN C.DANFORTH.MO. LLOYD BENTSEN.TEX. JOHN H.CHAFEE. R.I. SPARK M. GA,HAWAII JOHN HEINZ, PA. DANIEL PATRICK MOYNINAN,N.Y. 'ZICrtifeb Ziaf ez .,enaf e RECEIVED MALCOLM WALLOP, WYO. MAX BAUCUS, MONT. DAVID DURENBERGER. MINN. DAVID L. BOREN.OKLA. WILLIAM L.ARMSTRONG. COLO. BILL BRADLEY, N.J. COMMITTEE ON FINANCE STEVEN D.SYMMS,IDAHO GEORGE J.MITCHELL.MAINE CHARLES E.GRASSLEY,IOWA WASHINGTON,D.C. 20510 SEP 1 0 19 81 ROBERT E.LIGHTHIZER,CHIEF COUNSEL MICHAEL STERN,MINORITY STAFF DIRECTOR September 2 , 1981 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Jeanne Andre Administrative Assistant City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee , Minnesota 55379 Dear Jeanne: In the last few weeks , some additional Senators have thrown their support to legislation preventing municipally or publicly owned cable television systems , and the issue has gained a great deal of publicity. I just want to let you know that my position hasn' t changed on this , and I continue to oppose legislation that would rule out the possibility of a municipally owned cable system, There are examples of the benefits that can come from this approach in nearly three dozen cities , and the plans being discussed in the Twin Cities follow in that path. Neither House of Congress is likely to consider these bills before the fall , but I can assure you I will be opposing that amendment if and when it does come to the Senate floor, Sincer. y, Da - Uni e• a es Sena • DD/j rp J TO: John Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Don Steger, City Planner RE: Planning Commission Action on Conditional Use Permits DATE: September 11, 1981 Introduction: Planning Commission meeting was held last night, September 10th, where a request for a Variance was tabled but actions made on a number of Conditional Use Permit requests. Background: Planning Commission made the following decisions on the following Conditional Use Permit requests: 1. Request of Charles Mensing to move in a house from 425 Atwood to a vacant lot at Lot 7, Block 6, East Shakopee Plat. This was approved with various conditions; one added by Planning Commission in that the Utilities Manager shall approve the water service to the lot prior to issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Request to amend a Conditional Use Permit allowing for a game room/fast food facilities in a B-1 Zone. Gary Shehan, appliant for his Sub-Machine Shop. This amendment was for an extension of hours on Friday and Saturday evenings to 1:00 A.M. in order to accommodate his adult patronage. After receiving a letter from the Chief of Police stating he had no opposition, Planning Commission approved the amendment. 3. Request for a Conditional Use Permit to maintain and operate a kennel for show dogs in an R-1 Zone. This Conditional Use Permit request originated after a complaint from a neighboring resident. Roy Simmons, 130 Norton Drive, applicant. Planning Commission denied on the bases of diminishing the enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed kennel. jiw TENTATIVE AGENDA - MONDAY - ADJ.REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 14, 1981 Acting Mayor. Reinke presiding 1 ] Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 ] Continued discussion on proposed 1981 Budget 3] Other Business : 4] Adjourn to Tuesday, September 15th at 7 : 30 P.M. John K. Anderson City Administrator TENTATIVE AGENDA ADJ.REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Acting Mayor. Reinke presiding 1 ] Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2] Approval of Minutes of August 11 , 1981 3] Communications : a] Governor Quie re : Mn. Wellspring Executive Committee public introduction on Sept. 28th b] Mn. Public Utilities Commission re : Notice of NSP Co . application for rate increase 4] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 5] RECOGNITION B1 CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 6] Old Business : a] 7 : 30 P.M. Reassessment on Parcels Appealing Holmes Street Assessments - Res . No. 1907 - tbld 9/8 b] Review of Change Order Administrative Procedures approved in July, 1981 c ] Clarification of the Trunk Watermain Policy and its Application d] Assessments on CR-16 Utilities Improvement - tbld 9/8 (Res . No. 1905 Adopting Assessment Roll - not offered) 7 ] Planning Commission Recommendations : 8] Routine Resolutions and Ordinances : a] Res . No . 1908 - Authorizing Imtprovement, Approving Plans and Specifications , Ordering Ad for Bids and Designating A Project Engineer for A Water Supply Pumphouse at Well No. 6, Contract No . 81-2KT b] Res . No. 1909 - Resolution of Appreciation to Roger Peterson c ] Res . No . 1910 - Setting Fees and Requirements for the Rental of Pat Thielen Rodeo Arena 9] New Business : a] 8:: 00 P.M. Public Hearing - to Amend Request for Proposals (RFP) and Instructions to Applicants to Provide Cable Communications Services to the City of Shakopee ea] Open Public Hearing bb] Comments by public and Council cc] Adopt Amended Request for Proposals dd] Close public hearing b] 9 : 00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Proposed Revenue Sharing Fund Budget c ] 80-11 TH-1O1 Watermain Project , Change Order No. 3 d] Industrial Commercial Commission Recommendations : aa] Request funds for 1982 activities bb] Industrial Revenue Bond Policy - bring item 9j of June 2nd agenda or call for a copy) e] Access to Dressen Oil Co . f] Utility Hook Up Policy g] Metropolitan Council ' s "208" Water. Quality Management Advisory Committee h] 1981 Seal Coat Program i ] Grass Growth in Cracks TENTATIVE AGENDA September 15, 1981 Page -2- j ] Hiring Procedures k] Bonding for Link Judgment 1 ] Authorize Payment of the Bills m] Interest on Assessment for Holmes Street - Joel Hunzinker 10] Consent Business : a] Park Department Capital Budget b] Abatement of Assessment for parcel 27-001-630-0 c ] End of Probation - Don Steger 11 ] Other Business : a] Appoint Judy Cox, City Clerk, Acting City Administrator for the period of Sept . 19th - 26th. The Admr. will be at the tCMA Conference in Calif. b] The Mayor met with the Waste Management Board on Friday and as a result the City will not be withdrawing its volunteered P. C. I . site c] d] e] 12 ] Adjourn to . . . John K. Anderson City Administrator TENTATIVE AGENDA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE Special Session September 15, 1981 Chairman Hullander presiding 1 . Roll call at 7:00 P.M. 2. Approve Special Meeting Call 3. Approve Minutes of August 4, 1981 4. Explanation of Levy Limitation on Special Taxing Districts 5. Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization a. Progress Report b. Authorize Closings 6. Future Community Development Projects 7. Approve Bills 8. Other Business 9. Adjourn Jeanne Andre Executive Director i d i/LP 44,4s,1!:X4'' '7111 47Z, CITY OF SHAKOPEE . i\° INCOF.PORATED 1870 t `'af1L3P a 129 E. First Ave. - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379- (612) 445-3650 1376 September 9, 1981 Housing and Redevelopment Authority City of Shakopee 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Special Meeting Dear Commissioners: You are hereby notified that there will be a Special Meeting of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority at 7:00 P.M. , on Tuesday, September 15, 1981, in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The purpose of this meeting is to conduct a regular business meeting per attached agenda. If you are unable to attend this meeting, please contact Jeanne Andre, HRA Director. Sincerely, /htle&nd41, (r) Richard Hullander Chairman Shakopee HRA RH/jms enclosure The Heart of Progrcss V a llczl An Equal Onportunity Employer r PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AUGUST 4, 1981 Chrm, Hullander called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. with Comm. Lebens, Reinke and Colligan present. Comm. Leroux arrived later. Also present was Jeanne Andre, HRA Director. Reinke/Colligan moved to approve the minutes of July 7, 1981 as kept. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan moved to refer the Macey Second Add'n sidewalk repair matter to SPUC for payment of damages as recommended. Motion died for lack of second. Chrm. Hullander explained that he and Comm. Reinke had personally looked at the area and saw three places where the sidewalk settled somewhat, with one of those places being so bad you could put your whole arm under the sidewalk. They determined it was at the places where water was put in, not electricity. The electricity never crossed the sidewalk at any place. They thought that when the water was put in the ground was not compacted sufficiently. Comm. Leroux arrived and took his seat at this point, 7:05 P.M. Lou VanHout, SPUC Manager, stated that he had pointed out at the time this issue first came up that he thought the damage could have been caused by the water installation, but he hadn't examined it thoroughly at that time. He was not notified of the inspec- tion made by the City. He was dismayed to see this memo which again made no mention of water. He stated the monetary factor involved to repair the damage is not the issue, but he did not want the City Council to feel that SPUC was not responsive. He inspected the area himself and found 5 places where the sidewalk was damaged, and 3 of which were quite bad. He has prepared a report of his findings. Comm. Colligan stated that he was just going along with the recommendation put forth in the memo from the Engineering Dept. and had not actually looked at the area himself. Lebens/Hullander moved to order the sidewalk repair work to be done on Macey Second Add'n, and payment to be made from grant funds. Comm. Leroux stated that because he missed some of the discussion, he would abstain from the vote. Roll Call: Ayes; Hullander, Lebens, Reinke, Colligan Noes; None Abstain: Leroux Motion carried. Comm. Colligan stated that he was very dissappointed in the report from the Engineer- ing Dept. that it contained that much fallacy. Chrm. Hullander stated he thought the report was very incomplete. Hullander/Lebens moved to authorize the HRA Executive Director to attend the Interna- tional City Managers' Association Conference, Sept. 20-24, 1981 in Anaheim, Calif. , at a cost not to exceed $1200. Discussion ensued regarding whether or not the City Admr. was attending the same con- ference. Chrm. Hullander pointed out the advantages he felt would be received for the Downtown Redevelopment project. Shakopee HRA August 4, 1981 3 Page 2 Reinke/Hullander moved to table the item until the City Admr. can be asked his plans for the conference. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Reinke moved to pay the bills as presented: 1. Dean Smith Trenching, $668.50, final payment on Minnesota Street Project, grading and fill. 2. Al's Landscaping, $2,481.79, for landscaping for 4th and Minnesota Project. 3. Tom Siebenaler, $360.00, for sod for 4th and Minnesota Project. 4. Suburban Engineering, $478.00, for survey work, 4th and Minnesota Project. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Discussion ensued regarding water problems in Outlot A in Macey Second Addition, and where the money should come from to pay for correcting the problem. Reinke/Leroux moved to refer this action to City Council. Motion carried unanimously. The HRA Director informed the Commissioners that she has received the Handbook for Commissioners and it is available for them to read. The City Admr. arrived and was asked his plans for attendance of the International City Manager's Assoc. Conference. He stated it was budgeted but he hadn't decided if he is going to it. Discussion followed and it was generally agreed that if the City Admr. did not go, then the HRA Director should go. Reinke/Leroux moved to send one individual to the International City Managers' Assoc. Conference in Anaheim, Calif. , Sept. 20-24, 1981. Roll Call: Ayes; Hullander, Reinke, Leroux Noes; Lebens, Colligan Motion carried. Colligan/Lebens moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 7:30 P.M. Jeanne Andre Executive Director Diane S. Beuch Recording Secretary 2:// MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Jeanne Andre, Administrative Assistant RE:- Levy Limitation on Special Taxing Districts DATE: August 28, 1981 In the 1981 legislative session, legislation limiting the levy by special taxing districts for taxes payable in 1982 was adopted. The limit applies for one year only. The attached memo from the State Department of Revenue provides further information on the nature of the limit . The attached worksheet determines the maximum dollar amount to the HRA in 1982 as $24,480. This information is provided as background to HRA budget decisions to be made later this month. JA/jms NOTICE August 14, 1981 7 Payable 1982 Levy Limitation And Homestead Credit Restriction RECF;Imp AUG 2 1 Budget Officer Shakopee Housing Redevelopment Authority CITY OF SHAKOP 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Payable 1982 Levy Limitation Determination 1. Payable 1981 Total Property Tax Levy $ 67/0 / 2. Payable 1981 Bonded Indebtedness Levy $ 3. Levy Limitation Base (1-2) $ 72191)6 4. Ratio of 1981 To 1980 Homesteads 1.035- 5. .03S5. Homestead Adjusted Levy Limitation Base (3 X 4) $ 6. Payable 1982 Levy Limitation (5 X 108%) $ ��� 9 J Payable 1982 Maximum Homestead Credit Levy Determination 7. Homestead Adjusted Maximum Homestead Credit Levy (1 X 4) $ ,,;-( 7 8, Payable 1982 Maximum Homestead Credit Levy ( 7X 1081) $ o"t qtk) * If there was no increase in the number of homesteads in your district from 1980 to 1981 or if there was a decrease, the number 1.00 has been entered. Note: See the enclosed letter for an explanation of the amounts shown on this notice. Of THE 1 v• 81 4lN1.1-0 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CENTENNIAL OFFICE BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55145 August 14, 1981 PHONE°(612) 296-2246 TO: SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICTS RE: PAYABLE 1982 LEVY LIMITATION AND HOMESTEAD CREDIT RESTRICTION A new law passed during the 1981 Legislative Session affects the property tax levy for your special taxing district. The law states that the levy limitation applies for one year only, taxes payable in 1982. Prior to this new law (Extra Session Laws 1981, Chapter 1, Article V) , the property tax levy for your district was limited by specific mill rate, dollar, or per capita limitations provided by other laws. These limitations still apply. The new law provides for an overall limitation which is in addition to these specific limitations. The property tax levy of your district for taxes payable in 1982 can not exceed its levy limitation determined under either basis. The levy is restricted by whichever limitation (Specific or overall ) is the lowest. One of the purposes of this letter is to explain the new overall levy limitation to you and to inform you of your district's overall limitation for taxes payable in 1982. Your district's overall levy limitation is determined as follows. If your district had a payable 1981 levy to pay the principal and interest on bonded indebtedness, it is deducted from your district's total payable 1981 levy. (Your County Auditor has reported these amounts to the Department of Revenue as part of the 1981 Abstract of Tax Lists.) If there was an increase in the number of homesteads in your district between 1980 and 1981, the payable 1981 total levy less any bonded indebtedness levy is increased by the percentage increase in the number of homesteads . If there was no increase in the number of homesteads or if there was a decrease, no adjustment is made. (The number of homesteads is also reported in Abstract of Tax Lists.) The final step in determining the pay- able 1982 levy levy limitation for your districtis to increase the amount deter- mined above by 8%. Your district's levy limitation for taxes payable in 1982 is shown on line 6 of the enclosed notice. This notice also shows the amounts used in arriving at the limitation. The new overall levy limitation law does provide that there can be levies for certain purposes in addition to the amount of the overall levy limitation. These levies are called special levies . Two of the most common special levies for special taxing districts are: 1. Levies to pay the principal and interest on bonded indebtedness 2. Levies to pay for tort liability insurance (OVER) AN EQUAL OPPOnTUNITY EMPLOYER MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director RE: Closings Under the 235 Homeownership Program Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project DATE: September 9, 1981 Background Two units in Macey Second Addition should be ready to close by the end of September. The units are: Lot 8, Block 1 , to be purchased by Gene and Barbara Potthier, constructed by Goodwin Builders, Inc. Lot 9, Block 3 , to be purchased by Dean and Ingeborg Brunkow, constructed by Goodwin Builders, Inc. The units are not yet complete, but will be before staff arranges for the execution of the deeds. The Shakopee Building inspector and FHA inspector must grant final approval before the closings occur. The remaining four units now under construction should be closed in October, 1981. Requested Action The following motions should be adopted by the HRA to prepare for the closings: 1 . Authorize appropriate HRA officials to make, execute and deliver deed to Lot 8, Block 1, Macey Second Addition, subject to inspection and approval by staff of improvements constructed therein, to Goodwin Builders, Inc. This action to be in accordance with contract for deed between Goodwin Builders, Inc. and the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority, for the purpose of conveying said property to authorized buyer identified by HRA. 2. Authorize appropriate HRA officials to make, execute and deliver deed to Lot 9, Block 3, Macey Second Addition, subject to inspection and approval by staff of improvements constructed therein, to Goodwin Builders, Inc. This action to be in accordance with contract for deed between Goodwin Builders, Inc. and the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority, for the purpose of conveying said property to authorized buyer identified by HRA. JA/jms 6 MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director RE: Future Projects - Community Development DATE: . September 9, 1981 Introduction The HRA is winding down its 1978 Block Grant, the Fourth and Minnesota Neighbor- hood Revitalization Project. It is time to consider potential new projects. This memo is to provide background on the current status of the block grant program and introduce discussion of potential projects. Background 1. Block Grant Process and Criteria. As you know, recent legislation allows administration of Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) to be shifted from the federal to the state level, at the discretion of the states. Guide- lines and time schedules for the administration of the program can be modified by the state if it elects to administer the program. Normally the City would be preparing a CDBG pre-application now for submission in the fall. By year- end selected communities would be invited to submit final applications, and final award would occur by the start of the 1982 construction season. As the State of Minnesota is still considering whether it will be involved in the program in 1982 and the guidelines which would be implemented for their program, the application cycle and guidelines have not yet been established. The following are some of the rumored provisions of the state implemented program: 1. Housing Assistance Plan would probably not be required. 2. Application process may be shortened, with no pre-application. 3. Local matches may be required of applicants. 4. Funds may be allocated on the basis of regional development commissions such that all areas receive part of the pie, but no large grants are available. As more concrete information on a state-administered program becomes available it will be provided to the HRA. 2. Potential Local Projects. The following list of projects is presented for discussion, based on suggestions presented by City staff and the Council. Although these proposals are anticipated to benefit low- and moderate-income families , extensive background work on ownership of parcels and income status is reserved until further suggestions and comments from the HRA are provided. Under recent federal administration of the block grant program, public improvements are accepted for funding only in conjunction with housing (new construction or rehabilitation). In addition, targeting of improvements is encouraged. Funds for rehabilitation are often requested as part of the block grant. Funds for new construction have traditionally been secured from Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority September 9, 1981 Page Two other federal sources (eg. 235 or Section 8) , however these sources are scant or non-existent now. If the state would put a similar emphasis on housing, and the potential sources for funding new construction are two unknowns in the current process. Some suggested projects are listed below: a. Downtown Redevelopment: Project would be to assist in redevelopment as defined by the Downtown Committee (housing or economic development) and could include acquisition, demolition, land write-down, or rehabilitation loans or grants. If specific projects have not been identified, planning funds could be requested. b. Fourth and Shumway (N.E. corner) : The Scott County garage is unsightly and a non-conforming use in a residential area. The County plans to relocate the garage within the next five years. The City could encourage this relocation by planning acquisition, demolition and development of new housing. c. Fifth Avenue between Spencer and Main: The street has not been constructed on this portion of Fifth Avenue and there is no water or sanitary sewer from Spencer to Fillmore. Gene Brown has requested a 429 assessment pro- ject for land he owns in this area. A joint public/private project could be undertaken with housing rehabilitation and new construction combined with the public improvements. d. Market Street between Fourth and Seventh Avenues: This portion of Market Street has limestone, no water or sanitary sewer, open land and substandard structures. The project could install water and sewer and provide rehabili- tation and/or construction of new housing. e. Second Avenue between Naumkeag and Next Block East: Two homes in this area have fecal, coiform pollution in their wells. A temporary solution was devised in 1980, but installation of City water and sanitary sewer is the long-term answer. Housing rehabilitation could be combined with this program. Requested Action Additional projects are solicited, as well as comments on those outlined above. The HRA should provide direction as to which projects warrent follow-up and further examination. It is possible that some of the smaller projects can be packaged together into a single grant application. JA/jms 7 MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director RE: Payment of the Bills DATE: . September 9, 1981 The following bills have been incurred as part of the Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project. All but the payment to Sylvester Unze are eligible for reimbursement under the 1978 Community Development Block Grant. 1. Mr. Sylvester Unze, $300, payment for water damages incurred to his home. (Not eligible for grant reimbursement) . 2. Siehndel Construction, $362.60, for replacement of sidewalk. 3. Suburban Engineering, $200.00, for survey work. 4. Shakopee Valley News, $28.38, for newspaper ad to advertise home for sale. Recommended Action Approve payment of above—listed bills. JA/jms Og.THF a) SA T:'ylj A 'i t r M RECEIVED STATE OF MINNESOTA 4INNE50 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ALBERT H. QUIE AUG 2 4 19 81 GOVERNOR ST. PAUL 55155 CITY OF SHAKOPEE August 19, 1981 Dear Fellow Minnesotan: During the past six months , a number of concerned and active leaders have begun an initiative to address challenges and oppor- tunities for Minnesota' s future. Their specific objective is to focus resources in business, labor, education and government toward increasing our state's job opportunities and economic vitality through the promotion and application of technological innovation. In full support of these purposes, and enthusiastically welcoming the participation of the private sector in addressing public needs, I have pledged the complete cooperation of my administration. An organizing committee under the co-leadership of labor and business which includes representatives of education and govern- ment has been formed to undertake a comprehensive program of research, action and public information. The activity has been named The Minnesota Wellspring. The Minnesota Wellspring title derives from our state' s geographic uniqueness as a major source of water for the North American continent. In a broader sense the metaphor represents the continuous renewal of precious resources -- physical, human and spiritual. Minnesota is blessed with an industrious population which constitutes a superior pool of entrepreneurial talent and skilled labor. We have an outstanding education system to support the broad-scale development, application and integration of advanced technologies. Minnesota has a government dedicated to ensuring and enriching our quality of life. The Minnesota Wellspring is based on the belief that the creative collaboration of labor, business , education and government can help ensure our vitality as a state and foster the wellbeing of our citizens. My role as honorary chairman reflects my personal and official commitment to stimulating technology-powered economic growth now and in the years ahead. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 2 The Minnesota Wellspring Executive Committee joins me in inviting you to attend the public introduction of The Minnesota Wellspring on the evening of September 28 . The committee leadership will present a progress report and outline the direction of future efforts. A highlight of the evening will be the premiere showing of a dramatic multimedia presentation contributed to The Minnesota Wellspring by the University of Minnesota Institute of Technology. We encourage you to reserve the evening of September 28 to join us in launching The Minnesota Wellspring -- potentially the most significant new initiative undertaken in this decade. Information on time , .lace will follow. S.' sere i •� BERT H. QUIE Governor Encl. 3 QJ MINNESOTA WELLSPRING MINNESOTA WELLSPRING EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Honorary Chairman — Governor Albert Quie Co-Chairman — Raymond Plank, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Apache Corporation Co-Chairman — David Roe, President, Minnesota AFL-CIO Wendell Anderson — Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. Richard Caldecott — Dean, College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota Harlan Cleveland — Director, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota Willis Drake — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Data Card Corporation Phil Duff — Editor, Red Wing Republican Eagle Kent Eklund — Commissioner, Department of Energy, Planning and Development Gleason Glover — Executive Director, Minneapolis Urban League John Himle — State Representative, District 39B William Hueg — Deputy Vice President and Dean, Institute of Agriculture, Forestry and Home Economics, University of Minnesota Walter Johnson — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Conn-Co Jack Jorgensen, Sr. — President, Teamsters Joint Council No. 32 Phyllis Kahn — State Representative, District 57A Eugene Kotz — Dean, St. Thomas College Graduate Programs in Management George Latimer — Mayor, City of St. Paul Richard McFarland — President, Dain Bosworth Incorporated Roger Moe — State Senate Majority Leader, District 2 Lloyd Nielsen — Superintendent, Roseville School District No. 623 Hazel Reinhardt — Vice President and Director of Human Resources, Minneapolis Star and Tribune Company John Rollwagen — President and Chief Executive Officer, Cray Research, Inc. Richard Shepley — Vice President and Deputy Group Head, First Bank St. Paul Roger Staehle — Dean, Institute of Technology, University of Minnesota Executive Director — Donna Knight, Technical Options Project, 101 Capitol Square Building, Saint Paul .fib . RECEIVED Notice to Counties and Municipalities SEP 31981 CITY QF AKQPE BEFORE THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION STATE OF MINNESOTA In the Matter of the Petition of NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, DOCKET NO. E002/GR-81-342 Minneapolis , Minnesota, for Authority to Change Its Schedule Notice of of Electric Rates for Retail Application for Customers Within the State of Rate Increase Minnesota. On July 1 , 1981, Northern States Power Company (NSP) filed notice of an increase in its electric rates with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission , pursuant to Minnesota Statute 216B. 16. The Company has filed a schedule of rates which it proposes to become effective as soon as possible after the Commission renders a decision on the rate increases. By law, the Commission must decide by June 30 , 1982 how much of NSP ' s rate increase (if any) will be approved. NSP has also filed a schedule of interim rates which will become effective on September 29 , 1981 for service on and subsequent to that date. These rates will be collected by NSP prior to the Commission decision on NSP 's overall rate increase. If the Commission approves a rate increase that is less than the interim rates collected by NSP, the difference between the interim increase and the approved increase , plus interest, will be refunded to customers in a manner to be determined by the Commission. The interim rates NSP proposes to place into effect on September 29 , 1981 will generate approximately $94 . 4 million in additional revenues , or an increase of 13. 69% . Each customer' s bill will therefore increase by 13 .69% on that date. The overall rate increase which NSP proposes to place into effect after the Commission ' s decision thereon will result in approximately $115 .6 million in additional revenues , or an increase of 16 . 77% which will be reflected in customers ' bills after that date. Examples of the effect of these increases on typical bills are as follows: Annual Cost Monthly Rates Ordered KWH by MPUC Interim Usage on 4/30/81 after 9/28/81 Proposed Residential 550 KWH $344.00 $391.00 $408.00 Small Business 650 KWH $407.00 $462.00 $483.00 The Department of Public Service is conducting an investigation of NSP's books and records. Individual customers will be notified when hearings are scheduled. The proposed rate schedules and a comparison of present , interim and proposed rates may be examined by the public during normal business hours at the Department of Public Service , 790 American Center Building, 160 East Kellogg Boulevard, St. Paul and at Northern States Power Company offices located at 414 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis; 421 Wabasha Street, St. Paul; 825 Rice Street, St. Paul; 1700 East County Road E. , White Bear Lake; 3000 Maxwell Avenue, Newport; 2763 First Avenue Northwest, Faribault; 3930 Pepin Avenue, Red Wing; 3515 Third Street North, St. Cloud; 120 West Second Street, Winona; 2303 Great Northern Drive, Fargo, North Dakota; and 500 W. Russell Street, Sioux Falls, South Dakota. If you wish to intervene or testify in this case, contact Mr. Harry S. Crump, Hearing Examiner, Office of Admini- strative Hearings, 1745 University Avenue, St. Paul , Minnesota 55104 . Telephone number (612) 296-8111. The deadline for formal intervention is September 30 , 1981. -2- • BEFORE THE 'MThESO'I'A PUBLIC L'IILITLrS C Y?!ISSION Roger L. Hanson Chairman Leo G. Adams Commissioner Terry Hoffman Commissioner Juanita R. Satterlee Commissioner I Lillian Warren-Lazenberry Ccrmissioner { In the Matter of the Application Docket No. E-002/GR-81-342 of the Northern States Power Company for Authority to Change its Schedule NOTICE AND ODER of Electric Pates for Retail FOR HEARING Customers in the State of Minnesota FLND/NGS AND CaNCLUSIONS 1 I. JURISDICTION The _Minnesota Public Utilities Ccrmission (the Camission) finds that a hearing is necessary it the above-entitled matter to etermine the reasonableness of certain rate' increases proposed by the Northern States Power Company (NSP or the Qrrany). The Commission is authorized to conduct I such a hearing by M.S. § 2168.16. II. PROPOSED RATES The rates proposed by NSP would generate an additional $115,550,000 . or a 16.8% increase. NSP proposed an initial increase of $94,360,000, or 13.7%, with the final increase only to take effect upon Cortnission Order ; j following the .1.41Uletion of-this proceeding. Procosed interim and final class increases are listed in Appendix A, attached hereto. A cony of theCompany's requested rates is on file in the offices of I the Department of Public Service and is open to nublic inspection during . • normal office hours. A cony is also available for public inspection at the Company's office in ?Minneapolis and at the Company's local business offices. The Cortaission has suspended the rate schedule filed by the Company pending the hearing ordered herein. Fimnver, the Company has notified the Caanission that it will exercise its statutory right to 'lace increased rates into effect for service rendered on and after Sept tuber 29,1931.1 Such rates are subject to refund if the Ccm[mission ultimately orders a lesser increase. III. PPOC✓DL^_'AL cUTLI:IE The bearing on the petition will be conducted t v a Hearing Enrtiner appointed by the Chief Hearing Examiner of the State of Minnesota and will be held in cornliance with the applicable lavas relating to the Public Utilities Cormission, the Administrative Procedure Act (:1.S. S 15.0411-15.052), the riles 1 Pursuant to the Commission's action on September 1, 1981. } y of the Office of Administrative Hearings (9 MCAR § 2.201-2.222) and the Rules of Practice of the Public Utilities Commission (ilinn. Peg. PSC 500-521), to the extent that they have not been superseded by the rules of the Office of Administrative Hearings. These rules nay be purchased from the Documents Section of the Department of Administration, 117 University Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155, 612/297-3000. + The rules provide generally for the procedural rights of the parties i including: rights to advance notice of witnesses and evidence, right to a prehearing conference, rights to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses, and rights to purchase a record or transcript. Parties are entitled to issuance of subpoenas to carpel witnesses to attend and produce documents and other evidence. Any person intending to intervene as a formal narty to these hearings must suheit a Petition for Leave to Intervene to the Hearing axaminer and serve the petition on all existing parties. The petition must state hors the -Petitioner's legal rights, duties or privileges ray be determined or affected by the omission's decision in the matter and shall set forth the grounds and purposes for which intervention is sought and shall indicate the Petitioner's statutory right to intervene, if one exists. All parties have the right to be represented by legal counsel, by a nelson of their choice or by themselves if not otherwise prohibited as the unauthorized practice of law. A Notice of ATn7earance must be filed with the Fearing Examiner within 20 days of the date of service of this Order if any party intends to appear at the hearing. The Notice of Appearance is not recuired if the hearing date is less than 20 days frau the issuance of this Order. ' Potential intervenors shall attend the orehearing conference scheduled below with information which will facilitate the scheduling of hearings permitting all of the parties to present their evidentiary views in a manner and within a time frame which would be as fair and expeditious as possible. Mattars which may be discussed include: the reasonable time rpriod reruired to pre' re direct testimony for filing on all of the issues; the tire period for nreraration of direct testimony by intervenors; recnrrnended areas for hearings to receive public input regarding the petition; tire re- rt,ired for parties to nrenare for depositions and other discovery; and other :rattars that will facilitate full and fair hearings on the petition. r I CIf persons have good reason for requesting a delay of any hearing, the request crust be made in writing to the Hearing Examiner at least five days prior to the hearing. A copy of the request must be served on the Commission and all parties. Failure to appear at the 'raring may result in the issues set out herein being deemed proven. A possible result is that the rates proposed by ! 1 . NSP may be accepted by the °o mission. ` 1 1 Following the contested hearing, the Commission may approve all or any part of the proposed rate increase but may not approve an overall increase greater than that proposed by the Company. However, the Carmission may adjust rates for classes of customers to levels greater than those oluposed by the Company and make other rate adjustments based upon the testimony of other parties. If no person contests the proposed rate increase at the '.wring, the rates may be approved as proposed. Any ouestion concerning informal disposition of this matter or discovery of information should be addressed to Kenneth Nickolai, Special Assistant Attorney General, 720 American Center Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101, 612/296-6030. • All other questions concerning this hearing should be addressed to the Hearing Examiner assigned: I Harry Seymour Crump Office of Arm.inistrative Hearings • j 1745 University Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 612/296-8111 i The Minnesota Public Interest Pesearch Group (MPIRG) petitioned • the Commission to exclude the costs of the abandonment of the 'Tyrone nuclear . i facility from NSP's proposed interim rates, and petitioned for an i^mediate I I •• decision on the issue of NSP's proposed inclusion of Tyrone losses in test year expenses. NSP and other paries commented upon MPLRG'a request. The Omission, after due deliberation, concludes it has no Grounds to exclude a portion of a utility's proposed rates from being placed into effect subject to refund, under M.S. 5 2163.16, subd. 3. `±PIRG's request for exclusion is denied. -3- CThe Commission further concludes that due process requires it to allow NSP to present its case for inclusion of the Tyrone losses, despite the Commission's recent exclusion of those same losses in Northern States Power Company, Locket NO. E-002/GR-30-316. The Commission, unlike a court, is not bound by the doctrine of stare decisis, and is able to consider the i I reargument of a position advanced by one party. The Commission recognizes, however, the potential hardship to 1 ; parties who might have to completely reargue the same issue to which they devoted their tire and effort in USP, E-002/GR-30-316. Therefore, the Commission will order the record of NSP, E-002/GR-30-316 made a part of the official record of this proceeding and will expect parties to offer new evidence to supple- ment that record should they wish to develop a :osis for Ocrmission reversal 1 of its position. In its Order Accepting and Suspending Rates, issued July 24, 1981, the Commission suspended the operation of NSP's pLuwsed schedule of interim rates until December 29, 1931. That suspension is now extended until June 30, 1932, or until the Commission makes a final determination in this proceeding, ( whichever event occurs first. IORDER j 1. A contested case hearing concerning this matter shall be held, commencing with a preheating conference at 9:30 a.m., Friday, August 14, 19°1, at the Office of Administrative Hearings, 1745 University Avenue, St. Paul, til. 2. NSP shall facilitate in every reasonable way the investigation of the i , Department of Public Service. Such investigation should ccrnence after the issuance of this Order. All parties shall furnish adequate responses within 10 days to all resonable information requests from other n rties. { 3. "SPI' 's requests for exclusion of Tyrone and an e a ted decision on Tyrone are denied. 4. :ISP nay glace its proposed schedule of interim rates into effect on September 29 1931.2 5. The suspension of US?'s proposed interim rates is extended as noted above. 6. Mat position of the record of USP, E-002/CR-30-316, pertaining to the re- covery of Tyrone losses is hereby made hart of the record of this proceeding. 2 Pursuant to the Commission's action on Septeiiber 1, 1981. r 4 ' S v 7. The Company shall keep records of sales and billings under the present proposed rates such that any potential refund can be determined by canputing i what each customer's bill could have been during the refund period had the finally ordered rates been in effect and subtracting such amount faun the amount actually paid by each customer during that period. i 8. This Order shall be served on NSP who shall mail conies of the same to all munici'lities in its service area, all parties who filed petitions to II intervene (timely or untimely) in its most recent rate proceeding before the °omission (Docket No. E-002/(-80-316) and to such other persons as the Departrrnt of Public Service may request. 9. Public hearings shall be held at locations within the service area of the Company. 10. In addition to the individual notification as ordered by the Commission on July 24, 1981, the Company shall also publish notices of evidentiary hearings and public hearings in the form of ne•rsoaper display ads, at least 10 days prior to the dates of their commencement, in newspapers of general circulation in towns within the electric service territory. The heading on the display ad, RATE I:'CREASE NOTICE, rust be minimum 30 point bold face type. 11. This Order shall be effective immediately. I BY ORDER OF _ , cas'asSION i a 1 D. Young Executive Secre y : . t 'j SERVICE DATE: AUG 201981 ( SEAL ) -5- : r r' lI APP&IDI:L A { Customer Class Operating Revenues of Service Present Proposed Difference % Chanre z* I Residential $253,409,000 $288,286,000 $34,377,000 13.8% Crcial & Industrial 416,455,000 473,232,000 56,827,000 13.6 Lighting 11,565,000 13,161,000 1,596,000 13.3 Other Sales to Public • Authorities 7,749,000 3,809,000 1,060,000 13.7 Service Connection Charge 1,552,000 1,552,000 — Late Payment Charge 454,000 454,000 — — $691,134,000 $785,544,000 $94,360,000 13.7% FINAL Residential $304,310,000 S50,901,000 20.1% Commercial and Industrial 472,312,000 56,357,000 13.5 Lighting 14,380,000 2,812,000 24.3 Other Sales to Public Authorities 9,535,000 1,786,000 23.0 Service Connection Charge 3,725,000 2,173,000 140.0 Late Payment Charge 1,977,000 1,523,000 335.5 $306,739,000 $115,555,000 16.8% • 6Q/ MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Cler RE: Reassessment on Parcels Appea ing Assessments DATE: . September 10, 1981 Attached are two different versions of adopting the assessment roll for the nine parcels whose assessments were set aside by the court. One adopts the assessments which become due now and spread over the next ten years, while the other adopts the assessments, but defers them until such time as the construction of a lateral storm sewer which collects the designed storm for the properties. The deferred assessment carries no interest, per Council discussion, until such time as the assessments are no longer deferred, thereafter the interest will be charged at 8% per annum. The assessment which becomes due now would carry the same 8% interest as do all other properties which were assessed for the same storm sewer improvement. Action Requested 1. Determine, prior to offering resolution, which one Council prefers. 2. Offer Resolution No. 1907, A Resolution Adopting Assessment 1980-3 Public Improvement Program Holmes Street Reconstruction, and move its adoption. JSC/jms P.S. If the Council decides to defer the assessments in exchange for the property owners agreeing not to appeal their assessments, Mr. Krass recommended that the property owners withdraw their letters o intent to appeal and that the withdrawals be so noted in the minute . RESOLUTION NO. 1907 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS 1980-3 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HOLMES STREET RECONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council of the City of Shakopee met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessments of the following parcels, which benefit from the storm sewer improvement of the Holmes Street Reconstruction Project (80-3) : 27-001-0000-060-00; 27-001-0000-059-00; 27-001-0000-140-00; 27-001-0000-256-00; 27-001-0000-257-00; 27-001-0000-259-00; 27-001-0000-156-00; 27-001-0000-157-00; 27-001-0000-283-00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. That such proposed assessment together with any amendments thereof, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein and each tract therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improve- ments in the amount of the assessments levied against it. 2. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1982 and shall bear interest at the rate of 8.00 per- cent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added the interest on the entire assessment from the date oLthis resolution until December 31, 1982, and to each subsequent installment when due shall be added the interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certi- fication of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the aasess- ment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of this resolution; he may there- after pay to the County Treasurer the installment and interest in process of collection on the current tax list, and he may pay the remaining principal balance of the assessment to the City Treasurer. 4. The Clerk shall file the assessment rolls pertaining to this assessment in his office and shall certify annually to the County Auditor on or before October 10th of each year the total amount of installments and interest which are to become due in the following year on the assessment on each parcel of land included in the assessment roll. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the assessments on the above described parcels as adopted in Resolution No. 1670 are hereby abated and any payments already made and/or payable with 1981 payable taxes shall be refunded. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of _ , 1981. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1981 . City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 1907 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS 1980-3 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HOLMES STREET RECONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council of the City of Shakopee met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessments of the following parcels, which benefit from the storm sewer improvement of the Holmes Street Reconstruction Project (80-3) : 27-001-0000-060-00; 27-001-0000-059-00; 27-001-0000-140-00; 27-001-0000-256-00; 27-001-0000-257-00; 27-001-0000-259-00; 27-001-0000-156-00; 27-001-0000-157-00; 27-001-0000-283-00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1 . That such proposed assessment together with any amendments thereof, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein and each tract therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improve- ments in the amount of the assessments levied against it. 2. That such assessments are hereby deferred until such time as a resolu- tion is adopted setting assessments for the construction of a lateral storm sewer which collects the designed storm for the property for which the said assessment is deferred. 3. That such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January of the same year in which such lateral storm sewer assessments first installment shall be payable and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution for said lateral storm sewer. To the first install- ment shall be added the interest on the entire assessment from the date of adoption of the assessment resolution for said lateral storm sewer until December 31 of the calendar year in which the first assessments are to be collected by the County Treasurer and to each subsequent installment when due shall be added the interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 4. That such assessments shall be charged no interest during the period of deferrment. 5. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certi- fication of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accured to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer; he may thereafter pay to the County Treasurer the installment and interest in process of collection on the current tax list, and he may pay the remaining principal balance of the assessment to the City Treasurer. 6. The Clerk shall file the assessment rolls pertaining to this assess- ment in his office and shall certify annually to the County Auditor on or before October 10th of each year, the total amount of installment and interest which are to become due in the following year on the assessment on each parcel of land included in the assessment roll. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the assessments on the above described parcels as adopted in Resolution No. 1670 are hereby abated and any payments already made and/or payable with 1981 payable taxes shall be refunded. RESOLUTION NO. 1907 PAGE TWO Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1981. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1981 . City Attorney 6 CC- r . rd I--' n Un c-, In Ln C. I" ''r7 CT ed N n rn Li I- N (D N CD N CD CD N 11Lo W N O Pi 4 rt 4 rt . n rt ti) O W w r--, O 0 � ri 0 0 0 G 'TJr-� cn9 clsn c^ p, 9, n °zrrr s; r• G W G o O (D O (D O (D r• O r• (D G 0 bd 4iP r-, cn . G G G 171 cn G r-' m r I—, r • rt rt• •x G n r- rG7 rGt Phi r O Z E Z Z E (D • (D (D C3 3 o w 0 w 0 ri 0 > O r > - (D r-, 9 r-• 9 r' 9 - C r X C r-' H• 9 '0 9 10 P '0 0 co 0 > ) (D W r--+ (n (D W (D cv (D W 0 G ri C rt m r• (nn C/) r) cn 0`•<C G G CCD �' r0--' (D 0 f 0 00 c� o G . > .." ri (D vZ • L, r• +'' 0ams (n a o0 ri) 0 H 3 . co a 1.- V) m rt m (19 cL Cl) 9 Gd r N tz N) r N r N r N r N r C Cr] N I-e G r-- v v v r-h Pi T J0 N �p I x' N I V I 1 a, 1 r✓ I kJ, r-' 1 ri N O NO O I 0 O O ESO n 4 (� O w - O 0 C O 0 0 w 0 (D Z �p� rt x r N r Cd r bd F� N F CC In N r._ 0 (I'/ ", 0 • 1 O I - 1 I 1 � I h--, co I (n r N • r-' 1-h N X N eo N) N r' 'P'' 00 f) LPC0 In In In 1--, .p--1 Q° U - ma, 9 � • o, • r w (..a O ' O Ln o r o 'o cn ` ''d w I Cl) I N.) I N I I Z I . rt, I '0 • O • 0 ' 0 ' 0 O O O w 0 (D Cl) 70 ‘.o - 0 b0 0 0 • 0 N O O Cn" 0 W H 00 • S�° O O -' %� (n 1--, ,- 0 • w Cf) � P:1 M H. h7 .� -n Cr] cn CA ,-d • r-• toy 7 Cr] :,4 Cn N d rb rn 'd N x Cr) H In • r O irs 0 t. lvn - r.., r•h -4 N rri 1 - 0 rt r O (Jo 0 �•-- xit , I-•-) w 'i (D Z r• Z 70- r td rh.rt 0 W Cr) w (p r -, r, , it (�D C W X > n 70 •, 0 In • (n H h PA t-' (n r.-+ • 0 cn Z '1 cn hi-, w (n m • B to • m I N N F-' In In CO In CD N N D 00 N.) In lIt In J CO IA `' N Cn N N N) In (I) 0 o 0 0 0 1-1 --•1 13' O,, —i r-, , o, w rn oo CT C, O O' I O V 0 0 0 O r-' -40 0Z 00 w . > CO L..) w In rn In oo (p --1 U' 0 Ln Ch L• 1 00 N CO v In Cr) In r= I - w.• CO > l,.) Q1 In In In l..) '.0 S,. r- , w '! z • Cr0 i -1 (D o I I ( w 1-t, r r m U, a\ co ,.D co w N O O In 0 0 In I 0 m -i i i • it 1 1. ar-_. •...� �: . . 6 • Or •- Id 9 c-) ri rZ U) @ v 11W rt , lJ, r--4 U) rt O r O 'a Q £ �< (D n CDD ul ,C v CPC) z b m 1-i 70 0 r• m .1 r•-, o0 (n O 01 Cl (/) y m ^t 'D a. (n - a r v byv m --J I N W I n n ' O NrnO CD -t O - O r-4 x l O o r cn r v exJ (j) w0o In " 0 ^ w • �y cn v ~/d 7 cn .J f� v, I V I I V p ' O • � O W Cr) 70 x :4 0 d In p 0 7J Cr) cn O Ids tt, A 1_3 m ! H. t d• r .� Otrio 000 r 4. H. Pe ZN 0.2=1111 cn n MII C4 m H (D )--1 F--` (n d o cn z m C rt Pit N N (f) O Ofail 11 IMMO —4 ®„ rn rn 0 o O >Z 00 Lo D C o 0u-1 co m p +D o r Pm z CD - -,1 N 0 0 m N r--' Z Li, 0 m 0 0 'fl w MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Change Order Administrative Procedures DATE: September 11 , 1981 When approval was given to the Change Order Policy in July, it was agreed that Council would review the policy again in September. Does Council have any problems? Staff sees no need to make changes at this time. JKA/jms MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Clarification of the Trunk Watermain Policy and its Application DATE: September 11 , 1981 Introduction The City and SPUC have now had the opportunity to apply the new trunk watermain policy to three projects: the 101 Watermain Project; the CR 16 Utilities Project and the Bluff Avenue Utility Project. The application of the policy to these three projects expaned the need to clarify in more detail certain elements of the policy as expressed in SPUC Resolution No. 222 (Council Resolution No. 1791). Background The areas requiring clarification were discussed by SPUC at their August 31 , 1981 meeting, and minutes of that meeting are attached. Areas requiring clari- fication include: 1 . Method of computing oversizing 2. Items to be included in oversizing costs 3. How to deal with different zoning 4. Fund transfers 5. How the area to be assessed is determined and by whom SPUC addressed these questions and put in motion form the required "clarification" of each item so that the trunk policy can be consistently applied. Recommendation After discussion, City Council should adopt the same motions clarifying the application of the Trunk Watermain Policy. Action Requested That City Council pass a motion adopting the Trunk Watermain Policy clarifying language (motions) adopted by SPUC at their August 31 , 1981 meeting as outlined in their minutes of that meeting. JKA/jms MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (Regular Meeting) The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission convened in regular session on August 31, 1981 at 4:30 P.M. in the Utilities room. Commissioner Bishop offered a prayer for divine guidance in the deliberations of the Commission. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Bishop, Reinke and Nolting. Also Manager Van Hout, Superintendent Leaveck and Secretary Menden. John Anderson, City Administrator, Ken Adolf and Bill Price, consulting enginneers also attended. Motion by Nolting, seconded by Reinke that the minutes of the August 3, 1981 regular meeting be approved as kept. Motion carried. BILLS READ: City of Shakopee 20,032.00 Anderson's Lighting Concepts 3.15 ABC Sales 29.00 Auto Central Supply 112.32 Burmeister Electric Co. 858.02 Burroughs Corporation 358.86 Battery and Tire Warehouse 45.91 Braun Environmental Laboratory 60.25 City of Shakopee 1,249.80 Capesius Agency Inc. 2,199.00 Duluth Herald 16.40 Free Press Company 30.25 General Electric Supply 60.37 Graybar Electric 309.91 Harmons Hardware Hank 7.99 Henningson, Durham and Richards 1,010.07 IBM 64.03 Krass Meyer and Kanning 78.40 Layne Minnesota 20.22 Leef Brothers 15.00 Minneapolis Star and Tribune 75.60 Northland Electric Supply 120.85 Northern States Power Co. 1,371.69 Chas Olson and Sons 41.93 Serco Laboratories 52.00 Shakopee Valley News 60.03 Starks Cleaning Services 17.30 Shakopee Services 18.00 Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 164.66 Schoell and Madsen, Inc. 183.75 Suel Business Equipment 859.76 Ralph Thomas 201.50 Valley Industrial Propane 9.73 Water Products Co. 2,018.85 Zeco Co. 63.51 Motion by Nolting, seconded by Reinke that the bills be allowed and ordered paid including the Northern States Power Co. energy bill when it arrives. Motion carried. C, Various aspects of the trunk water policy were discussed. The method of calcu- lating the oversizing payment was discussed at length. Motion by Nolting, seconded by Reinke that the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission adopt the calculating method for watermain project costs sharing, due to oversizing, on a pro rate basis based upon the assessable front footage and that this motion is an enhancement of the existing policy as expressed in Resolution #222. Motion carried. Motion by Reinke, seconded by Nolting that the items to be considered for the oversizing costs under the trunk water policy are to be as follows: 1. Pipe, valves and fittings (material costs) 2. Installation cost difference, if any, for added labor. 3. Added excavation costs for rock only. 4. Administrative costs as a percentage of oversizing. Motion carried. A clarification of capitolized interest was given by John Anderson. This was regarding certain watermain projects. The timing of payments for oversizing was discussed. Shakopee Public Utilities Commission is not able to use a ten year payment period in these cases and must pay on a current basis. The timing of receipts for trunk water charge was discussed. The mechanics of the funds transfer were discussed. John Anderson stated that he understood that the money would be sent to Shakopee Public Utilities Commission when the bonds were sold. Motion by Reinke, seconded by Nolting that for receipts of trunk charges made according to the trunk water policy, that the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission will receive the money "up front" upon the sale of the bonds; and at the time that the project is assessed the money for oversizing costs will then be paid by the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission to the City Treasurer. Motion carried. The next item dealt with was different zoning on opposite sides of project frontage. The consensus was that when an area charge is applied, the payments will be based upon the zoning, and that this policy was now covered by the motion made earlier to adopt a calculating method for oversizing payment. No allowances will be made for single side assessment. Non assessable front footage is still by a pro rata basis for both lateral costs and oversizing costs. Final costs are to be obtained from the project engineer for presentation to Shakopee Public Utilities Commission at the conclusion of the project when oversizing costs are approved for payment. Motion by Reinke, seconded by Nolting that when a certain improvement project is set forth that the area to be charged a trunk water charge is addressed in the feasability study as per the trunk water maps and that after the feasability study is completed the Utility Commission will have the opportunity to review this prior to the Council taking it to public hearing before ordering the project. Motion carried. Motion by Reinke, seconded by Nolting that we concur with the engineers report and that under the trunk water policy the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission will pay the difference of $2,335.55 in addition to the $18,204.75 on the County Rd 16 Utility project. Motion carried. Motion by Reinke, seconded by Nolting that we approve the intervention of the River electric Association that was started on Friday, August 28, 1981 with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Motion carried. Motion by Nolting, seconded by Reinke to offer Resolution #232 A Resolution that the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission go on record to only furnish water to locations within the City limits. Ayes: Commissioners Bishop, Reinke and Nolting. Nayes: none Resolution passed. Motion carried. The electric service to the Eastview Addition was discussed. There are six lots which have electric service under an agreement with the developer although he has not yet paid the charges. The balance of the lots in this subdivision were deleted from the agreement and a new agreement must be made and all charges paid before these lots will have electric service. Mr. Wallace Bakken arrived to discuss the water service to lot 4 of the Halo 2nd Addition. Before the Utilities Commission is able to approve of the water system in a different form than was originally approved, statements of the building inspector and of the Fire Department are needed, since the request is to delete a part of the system as approved. A report of time spent by Shakopee Public Utilities Commission employees at fire calls each month will be put on the agenda to be prepared by the foreman. The next regular meeting will be held on October 7, 1981 at 4:30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room. Motion by Reinke, seconded by Nolting to approve the plans and specifications for pump house #6. Motion carried. Motion by Nolting, seconded by Reinke that the meeting be adjourned. Motion carried. l4(24774°-.71--- ou Va Hout, Manager b O MEMO TO: John Anderson, City Administrator Lou VanHout, Utilities Manager 16001.- FROM: . H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer 114, ',AV" RE: County Road 16 Utilities Improvement Pro ect No. 80-4 DATE: September 11, 1981 Introduction: Pursuant to direction of City Council, the assessments for the above- referenced project have been recomputed. Background: There is no alteration to the computations of the sanitary sewer assessment but the watermain assessment has been altered. An estimate of the oversizing cost was made August 27, 1981 and was submitted and approved by SPUC. That estimate did not include rock excavation cost for the oversizing. On August 31st, SPUC adopted a new policy regarding the payment of oversizing. That policy included payment for rock excavation. On September 3rd, a second estimate of the oversizing cost was prepared and the oversizing cost increased from $21,440.75 to $26,657.81. The net affect was that the SPUC Trunk Fund payment increased from the original $2,335.55 to and estimated $8,453.06. The attached assessment roll reflects the corrections noted above. The total oversizing cost is an estimated $25,692.89. This number does not represent the actual oversizing cost which should be determined after the project Ls constructed. It includes a 10 percent construction contingency which will not be used unless the number of units installed increases. This actual oversizing cost is still only 82 percent of the oversizing cost estimated in 1980, so that even though this cost results in a payment by the trunk fund. Overall trunk fund costs should even out. Recommendation: It is the recommendation of City staff that: John Anderson, City Administrator September 11, 1981 ct Lou VanHout, Utilities Manager Page -2- 1. SPUC concur and approve participation in the trunk cost specified in the attachment to the assessment roll; 2. City Council adopt Resolution No. 1905, A Resolution Adopting Assessments 80-1 Public Improvement Program, (County Road 16 Utilities). HRS/jiw Attachments RESOLUTION NO. 1905 A Resolution Adopting Assessments 80-4 Public Improvement Program County Road 16 Utilities WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council of the City of Shakopee met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessments of: County Road 16 East of County Road 17 and West of the west line of Section 5 and 8, Township 115, Range 22, by watermain and sanitary sewer NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. That such proposed assessment together with any amendments thereof, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein and each tract therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvements in the amount of the assessments levied against it. 2. 'Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1982, and shall bear interest at the rate of 11.75 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added the interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1982 and to each subsequent installment when due shall be added the interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of this resolution; he may thereafter pay to the County Treasurer the installment and interest in process of collection on the current tax list, and he may pay the remaining principal balance of the assessment to the City Treasurer. 6 GU . Resolution No. 1905 Page -2- 4. The Clerk shall file the assessment rolls pertaining to this assessment in his office and shall certify annually to the County Auditor on or before October 10th of each year the total amount of installments and interest which are to become due in the following year on the assess- ment on each parcel of land included in the assessment roll. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1981. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1981. City Attorney Revised: September 10, 1981 ASSESSMENT COMPUTATIONS County Road 16 Utilities Project No. 80-4 WATERMAIN Oversizing Cost: 2450 L.F. 12" D.I.P. @ $12.15/L.F. $29,767.50 2450 L.F. 8" D.I.P. @ $6.99/L.F. 17,125.50 $12,642.00 2300 lbs. 12" Cast Iron Fittings @ $1.00/lb. $ 2,300.00 1250 lbs. 8" Cast Iron Fittings @ $1.00/lb. 1,250.00 1,050.00 6 - 12" G.V. & Box @ $635.00/Ea. $ 3,810.00 6 - 8" G.V. & Box @ $410.00/Ea. 2,460.00 1,350.00 1500 C.Y. Rock Excavation for 12" Pipe @ $13.25/C.Y.$19,875.00 1225 C.Y. Rock Excavation for 8" Pipe @ $13.25/C.Y. 16,231.25 3,643.75 Construction Cost for 8" to 12" Oversizing $18,685.75 Contract Amount for 12" Watermain $63,908.30 Less Oversizing 18,685.75 Computed 8" Watermain Cost $45,222.55 Restoration Allocated to Sanitary Sewer; Half Seeding and Sodding: Seeding $ 5,000.00 ( .5) $ 2,500.00 Sodding 875.00 ( .5) 437.50 Restoration Allocated to Sanitary Sewer $ 2,937.50 Contract Amount for Restoration $13,197.00 Less Restoration Allocated to Sanitary Sewer 2,937.50 Restoration Allocated to Watermain $10,259.50 Contract Amount for Sanitary Sewer $90,305.00 Total Expenses 62,778.70 Expenses Proportioned According to Bid Cost: Sanitary Sewer Contract Cost x Total Expenses = Sanitary Sewer Expense Total Contract Cost $ 90,305.00 x $62,778.70 = $33,864.29 'i67,410.30 Sanitary Sewer Restoration Contract Cost x Total Expenses = Sanitary Sewer Total Contract Cost Restoration Expense $ 2,937.50 x $62,778.70 = $1,101.56 $167,410.30 Computed 8" Watermain Contract Cost _ 8" Total Contract Cost x Total Expenses - Computed Watermain Expense $ 45,222.55 x $62,778.70 = $16,958.41 $167,410.30 Watermain Restoration Contract Cost x Total Expenses = Watermain Restoration Total Contract Cost Expenses $ 10,259.50 x $62,778.70 = $3,847.30 $167,410.30 Watermain Oversizing Cost Total Contract Cost x Total Expenses = Watermain Oversizing Expense $ 18,685.75x $62,778.70 = $7,007.14 $167,410.30 County Road 16 Utilities Revised: 9/10/81 Assessment Computations Page -2- 6 Right-of-way Proportioned According to Total Construction Cost Plus Expenses: Subtotal Sanitary Sewer x Total ROW Cost = Sanitary Sewer Subtotal Sanitary Sewer + Subtotal Watermain Portion of ROW $128,208.35 Cost $204,496.11 x $13,800 = $8,651.88 Subtotal Computed 8" Watermain x Total ROW Cost = Watermain Portion Subtotal Sanitary Sewer + Subtotal Watermain of ROW Cost $ 76,282.76 $13,800 = $5,148.12 $204,496.11 x TABLE 1 Project Cost Summary Description Amount Construction Contract $167,410.30 10% Construction Contingency 16,741.00 Technical Services 29,180.70 Improvement District Cost 16,857.00 Right-of-way Acquisition 13,800.00 Subtotal $243,989.00. Trunk Water Assessment 18,204.75 TOTAL $262,193.75 TABLE 2 Computation Summary Description Contract Expenses Subtotal ROW Total Sanitary Sewer " $ 90,305.00 $ 33,864.29 $124,169.29 $ 8,651.88 $132,821.17 San. Sewer Restoration 2,937.50 1,101.56 4,039.06 0.00 4,039.06 Subtotal Sanitary Sewer $ 93,242.50 $ 34,965.85 $128,208.35 $ 8,651.88 $136,860.23 Computed 8" Watermain $ 45,222.55 $ 16,958.41 $ 62,180.96 $ 5,148.12 $ 67,329.08 Watermain Restoration 10,259.50 3,847.30 14,106.80 0.00 14,106.80 Subtotal Watermain $ 55,482.05 $ 20,805.71 $ 76,282.76 $ 5,148.12 $ 81,435.88 Subtotal w/Computed 8" $148,724.55 $ 55,771.56 $204,496.11 $ 13,800.20 $218,296.11 Oversizing Cost 18,685.75 7,007.14 25,692.89 0.00 25,692.89 Total Cost $167,410.30 $ 62,778.70 ` $230,189.00 $ 13,800.00 $243,989.00 County Road 16 Utilities Revised: 9/10/81 Assessment Computations Page -3- SANITARY SEWER Trunk Cost: Oversizing 10" PVC to 12" PVC for 12' - 14' deep - Material $ 1.35 Labor .90 Rock Excavation 1.06 Total $ 3.31 Oversizing 10" PVC to 12" PVC for 14' - 16' deep - Material $ 1.35 Labor .98 Rock Excavation 1.23 Total $ 3.56 Oversizing Description Quantity Unit Price Total 10" to 12" PVC 12' - 14' deep 526 L.F. $ 3.31 $ 1,741.06 10" to 12" PVC 14' - 16' deep 235 L.F. 3.56 836.60 Total Bid Cost $ 2,577.66 10% Construction Contingency 257.77 Subtotal $ 2,835.43 25% Improvement Dist. Cost 708.86 Total Trunk Cost $ 3,544.29 Total Assessable Sewer Cost $136,860.23 Less Trunk Cost 3,544.29 Lateral Cost $133,315.94 Lateral Assessment for Sanitary Sewer: Lateral Cost __ $133,315.94 = $33.96584/Front Foot Front Footage 3,925 F.F. Area Trunk Assessment for Sanitary Sewer: Trunk Cost _ $3,544.29 = $82.61748/Acre Trunk Area 42.90 Ac. WATERMAIN 8" Lateral Cost Assessment Rate $81_,435.88 = $21.74523/Front Foot Front Footage 3,745 F.F. Area Trunk Assessment for Watermain: Trunk Charge x Trunk Area = $435/Acre x 41.85 Ac. = $18,204.75 Total Oversizing Cost $25,692.89 Less Trunk Water Assessment 18,204.75 Trunk Cost Paid by Trunk Fund $ 7,488.14 L.. , • H .r O� CO LA O� H ct) LIN H • 1.• 0 0 0 H H 01 N- H H O\ O\ H ^ H (0 ' coVD U • t+} - 4A- 4A- 1 H u\u\ ( �Oct\ 0N No 00 vb c0 •O\HO NHHcO Lr\ OOO 0000 \O0000 Y. icv � � rCO NO O O O\ O O O r- C1 O Ocd 3 N (.0h- N H u\O\ 00 Hi O0\--1' \O O Ln HN • N H _COn• .' N 3 3 �. COiaa Hr�l11 Htu-lE+ a H1 u7Hr1 EitOlH �I I -7 W C) ' ` 4.1 o �O coC 14"0 `° H H E-- U. V • OC I U) Q N H CT O\ 1--- , • H c 0 , W d W N • Q 4-, \.O CI CO W > O 1 - s~ X1 z ^ • H • CO3 a o ^F,-,3 ' c co 00 H •= 0 U c0 'd O �, N H H to a co 27 0 N N 'Y W cd H b s~ 1 E - •W co • CD r0 cd •H 0 CO U _ C a1 H 4J — a 0 � � +• 01 CO 30 +' o a0) HtsL ou] 0 u • H . amHa m LP 4 u O H ^ a r N �. + -incn3 • ( HCa r-7-1x A W [A 0 H M 0 u) + 0 H I. ...-i Wo •01 0 w .- • H LIN bv w 0 • o • a Co I o •Cd � ofHx -4 � ;al uv o oc� c� rnu\ •� O • a r' AzMooi Qo3 NN 0H uo H oo � On +, { O +'3 Lrp r� 0 I . CO Ncr1 I O O 0 0 c: Q z 3 ) 0 0 ,C Oma• 00 aO • 43 CO O 1 Cl N U ^' t N f~ \-D ..- +^•r1 Hof O N N ^ LII N v N N • it H C\ (n I N Cil I N • N N N U - (>~ is I N W I N.-Lt •• F__ Si 0 L(\ �� (0 o in ff q in 40 0 i L CO CO0 .0 0 1A ^ W fC COppbrU) 1 W H I H OH41 N H ' HH 4-c O (1-, 4-) rHiO P 110 """"� N',O 0 7 0 C\'�D H CO �p 1.- O N e23 3 N t`-a H N�O P\� to ,"+i1 i V W i V) 0 1Q U u) i r-1 d H N Co -P 1 II CO cc rri O r-IN .a) MI cr el.) LIN U� i Z N +3 d U U N • 0 1 it '-4 g b W P, 1'1 H HU5P. � O s~ u cd cd •r♦kD +) O N- . WI c� ZO Cf) \D �• 0 \O N CO LA \O CD ..+ -1• 0 C- \O 0 Q !7 (''1 M 0 1••• �O N M N Lf\ O ^ ^ a J N \O i --1- H 0\ N 1 . fft CO -- --- \D •d • N- 0 u\ 0 \-O N-0 M O\ 0 u\ 0 M N O in O\ U\C CU O\ O.-I• 0 [ ON 0 H N 0 N 0 O\0 c0 CO N O\ t.._00 OHO O •r-� rIN O MO O H HBO -i' in-7In P+ co N c0 M IA H O\ cO cc O N --/. O U) N H N• H O\ON r-i N u\ Q\\O Q�N Cn M H N-� N• l!\ H N 7 Cr) M M c H -GA- - fF} H Ha a Ha a HaEF1 Halla E Ea I WI^^ Z V O L\ H oc O 01 UN "•O «' H V OL 1 0 in c0 Q N u\ N M H N M H C i W N- H tt UJ o 03 pi o z o ON a p, N CX w .0 r1 0 0 (n a a as ..t3v a' es-, 4� 4 6 1-' U) L- \O H H `Z H J •,O.I 0 ,g • 44 04-1 P-4 Hi N• ,, Cr H ►- CIa4 u • Q M W Ha . H . in X U) U) �. W "@+ cz V •H CO V U] N- CO 0 ?CW.23tiCa EIW 0 H o u-\ O4a • V1 =+t, 'Lf H C4 H U\ H 0 0 Q• ,,O MA (1),-1-fr 0 X a ZC •d r*-I 0 V) H G • 44 CI-i \O 4) OI W N U O U) \O H 4-i O CSS • Z \,0 rd 0 •U N.i• 0 u\ 0 0 3 N\O\O 3 Cld Cd O O Q C OI N ZC� Ti ,03 O O r-1 C' O u t!� P (— 41 N CT V Li. A N N C N W to PP cd H N os +) NN v •r1 UNCI) • NN Lr• N4-i • •Z N- I N H O N N V 1' I ('40 - (I) tn LA pp �O 41 M 1~ 0 'O CO • 1.. O H H C • O u\ 0 MLA In U\ +) 0 LA Cl)..7 HHO •ri O rnH H r1ri 41 O\ H • C O y, Q) 1 H O X00 r-1 H O O 1 Hr•1-rN IL) v) t--- ar .1U) N\ORaal O �ONP. W N\OCC/) H • i 0 LU CC U H CO 0 0 O • 0� U W N H 0 Q Z •i co H O 0 Q N' O Q) HLI"\ C N• 0 M i� Cr) U] U\ O +3 ++ N u'\ +- u\ ~ Ord u\ U 11 •-I N g CV H P4 H .2 0 ri 01 0 N fl OEI P� CA O 0 Q COO y 00 � b a o .n 03 P. -I FRl. HH CO ,. H r1 Cl) • gam TO: John Anderson From: Lou Van Hout Date: 9-10-81 Re: Pumphouse #6-part of tax increment project,81-2KT INTRODUCTION: Attached to this memo is a copy of the plans and specs for Pumphouse P(p, As part of the tax increment package, the contract will be bid and let by City Council with SPUC administering the project. The engineering was done by Schoell and Madsen Co. BACKGROUND: The Utility Commission approved of the plans and specs at their August, 31 meeting. The next step is for City Council to approve plans and specs, authorize advertisement for bids, and designate a project engineer. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution #1908. RESOLUTION NO. 1908 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING IMPROVEMENT, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS AND DESIGNATING A PROJECT ENGINEER FOR A WATER SUPPLY PUMPHOUSE AT WELL NO. 6 CONTRACT NO. 81-2KT WHEREAS, the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority has entered into an agreement relative to Valley Industrial Park Redevelopment Project No. 1; and WHEREAS, that agreement provides that the City construct specific off-site improvements including a water supply well; and WHEREAS, a pumphouse is included as a necessary part of a water supply well; and WHEREAS, Ken Adolph, Schoell & Madson, Inc. , has prepared and presented to City Council, for approval, plans and specifications for the construction of Water Supply Pumphouse No. 6 Contract No. 81-2KT including structure, piping,chemcial feed equip- ment, and controls and other work incidental to construction; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. The installation of a water supply pumphouse in the extreme southwest corner of the NW 1/4 of 9-115N-22W is hereby authorized. 2. Plans and specifications for said pumphouse, a copy of which is on file and of record in the office of the City Clerk, are hereby approved. 3. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of said water supply well under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for two weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Clerk until 10:30 A.M. , on October 16, 1981, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the Project Engineer and the City Clerk, or their designee, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 P.M. , or thereafter, on October 20, 1981, in the Council Chambers, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the order of the City of Shakopee for not less than five (5%) percent of the amount of the bid. 4. Kenneth Adolph, Schoell & Madson, Inc. , is hereby designated as the Project Engineer for this improvement. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesotaheld this day of , 1981. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1981. City Attorney • k) MEMO MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Resolution of Appreciation to Roger Peterson DATE: . September 10, 1981 Introduction Pursuant to your direction, I have prepared the attached resolution of appreciation to Roger Peterson. Action Recommended Offer Resolution No. 1909, A Resolution of Appreciation to Roger A. Peterson, and move its adoption. JSC/jms 1 RESOLUTION NO. 1909 A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO ROGER A. PETERSON WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Council did create an Industrial and Commercial Development Commission in August of 1978; and WHEREAS, Roger A. Peterson was appointed to said commission as one of its original members; and WHEREAS, Roger A. Peterson has served unselfishly and has dedicated many hours to the efforts of the Industrial and Commercial Development Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL, does hereby extend to Roger A. Peterson the deep appreciation of the City for his years of civic interest and dedicated service to the community. Adopted in adjourned session of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 15th day of September, 1981 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1981. City Attorney MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: Resolution Setting Fees for Rental of Rodeo Arena DATE: September 11, 1981 Introduction Pursuant to your direction I have prepared the attached resolution setting fees for the rental of the Pat Thielen Rodeo Arena incorporating the recom— mendations made by Mr. Muenchow in his memo of August 25, 1981. Recommended Action Offer Resolution No. 1910, A Resolution Setting Fees And Requirements For The Rental Of Pat Thielen Rodeo Arena, and move its adoption. JSC/jms RESOLUTION NO. 1910 A RESOLUTION SETTING FEES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RENTAL OF PAT THIELEN RODEO ARENA • BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1 . The fee for rental of the Pat Thielen Rodeo Arena (for a period not to exceed seven consecutive days) shall be as follows: a. 1 non-profit organizations $ 00.00 b. None lural non-profit organizations 200.00 or 15% of gross ticket sales, Fti whichever is greater c. Profit making organizations 200.00 or 15% of gross ticket sales, whichever is greater 2. The Rentor shall provide insurance coverage as follows: a. Public liability insurance with coverages of at least $100,000.00 for any one person and $500,000.00 for any accident or occurrence and file with the City a policy or certificate thereof by the insurance carrier showing that such coverage is in force during the period for which the arena is being rented. Such policy or certificate shall contain a provision that the City will be notified in writing at least ten (10) days in advance of any intention to cancel said coverage and shall name the City of Shakopee as an additional insured. b. Products liability insurance if any food or drink is served upon the premises and the policy or a certificate thereof by the insur- ance c 3rrier showing that such coverage is in force during the period for which the arena is being rented and it shall be filed with the City. Such policy shall contain a provision that the City will be notified in writing at least ten (10) days in advance of any intention to cancel said coverage and shall name the City of Shakopee as an additional insured. 3. Restroom facilities (satelites) shall be provided at the ratio of one per one-hundred occupancy load or one per 1 ,000 square feet of assembly area. 4. Rentor shall be responsible for rubbish removal necessitated as a result of rentor's occupying premises and rentor shall leave the premises in the same condition as it was prior to its being occupied. 5. Rentor shall be responsible for any other direct costs to the City as a result of renting the premises. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1981 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1981 . City Attorney MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre, Administrative Assistant RE: Public Hearing to Amend Request for Proposals (RFP) and Instructions to Applicants to Provide Cable Communications Services to the City of Shakopee DATE: September 10, 1981 Introduction At its September 1, 1981 meeting, the Shakopee City Council requested staff to establish a public hearing to amend the RFP adopted by the Council on August 18, 1981 (adopted version enclosed with agenda packet) . The hearing is set for September 15, 1981, at 8:00 P.M. Background Subsequent to the adoption of the RFP it came to the attention of members of the City Council and the Ad Hoc Cable Communications Committee that one service required in the RFP, a video emergency alert override system, might be an expensive requirement which could significantly increase the cost of cable services to subscribers relative to the benefit received. The City Council requested the public hearing to consider whether this requirement should be dropped. I consulted with Anita Benda, cable consultant on this issue and the cost figures she provided did not coincide with the figures the Council informally discussed at its September 1st meeting (approximately $65,000-80,000 for video portion of emergency override) . Ms. Benda did not research this issue in response to the most recent Council action. However she did call Gerald Equipment Company (maker of emergency override equipment) at the time of previous discussion by the Ad Hoc Cable Communications Committee. The company representative suggested a total cost of $16,000 for an emergency override, $6000 attributable to audio override and $10,000 to video override. Ms. Benda offered to further investigate the discrepancy in her cost estimates with others which have been discussed. However I declined her offer at this time because Council had not directed this action and the additional cost implied. If Council wishes to continue the public hearing until October 6, 1981 , and solicit more information, that option is still available. Irrespective of the savings involved the Council may wish to drop the require- ment for a video emergency override unless there is a compelling reason to keep this provision (eg. service to deaf community) . The Council may wish to keep this provision as a service which might be offered if available at a low cost, to keep the option of this service open. Language for both of these options follows in the recommended action section. Recommended Action Amend Section II. , G. , 6. , Services, applicants shall provide to read: Audio emergency alert override system on all programmed channels, with video emergency notices to be provided on designated emergency channel. John K. Anderson CL, September '10, 1981 Page Two Amend Section II. , G. , Services, applicants might consider to include an additional category: Low—cost video emergency alert override system on all programmed channels. JA/jms 9b MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxiand, Finance Director RE: Public Hearing for Revenue Sharing DATE: September 9, 1981 Pursuant to Revenue Sharing Regulations,Council needs to hold a public hearing on the proposed Revenue Sharing Fund budget. Notice has been published and the hearing is scheduled for 9/15/81. GV/ljw 571-6066 �; UBURBAN 6 6875 Highway No. 65 N. E. E NOINEERINGi Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 INC 890-6510 t d 1 a Civil, Municipal & Environmental Engineering 1101 Cliff Road it Land Surveying •• Land Planning •• Soil Testing Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 DAug. 24,1981 File #S78085 Shakopee Public Utilities Comm. 1030 East 4th Ave . Shakopee , MN 55379 Attn: Mr. Lou VanHout Re : TH 101 Trunk Watermain Extensions Dear Lou: Enclosed herewith are 5 copies of Change Order No. 3 for the above referenced project . The Change Order is required to establish unit prices for a 6" water service . The contract proposal did not contain unit prices for this item. The compensation requested by the Contractor is reasonable for the work performed and we therefore recommend approval of the Change Order as prepared. Sincerely, ki Dan P. Johnson, P.E . SUBURBAN ENGINEERING, INC. 7 DPJ/lh enc ACTION REQUESTED: Approve change order number 3 for 80-11 TH101 Watermain Project, at an increased cost of $1 ,022 . 50 and authorize proper officials to execute same. Robert Minder,Reg.Eng. E.A.Rathbun,Reg.Suru. Wm.E.Price,Reg.Eng. Gary R.Harris,Reg.Suru. Peter J.Molinaro,Reg.Eng. Wm.E.Jensen,Reg.ung. William J.Brezinsky,Reg.Eng. H. William Rogers,Reg.Suru. Bruce A.Paterson,Reg.Eng. Daniel P.Johnson,Reg.Eng. Kim W. Waldof,Reg.Eng. Robert Sikich,Reg.Suru. Peter J.Knoeble,Reg.Eng. c- CHANGE ORDER Change Order No. : 3 Project Name: T.H. 101 Trunk Watermain Estensio Date: July 29, 1981 Contract No. : 80-11 Original Contract Amount $ 170,643. 75 Change Order(s) No. 1 thru No. 2 $ 5 ,790. 00 Total Funds Encunbera l Prior to Change Order $ 176 ,433 . 75 Description of Work t be (Added ltpi x 6 : Water Service 27 L.F. 6" DIP @ $ 14. 50 = $ 391 . 50 1 Ea. 6" G.V. @ $330. 00 = $ 330 .00 350 Lbs . .CI .Fittings @ $ . 86 = $ 301 . 00 TOTAL WORK ADDED $1 ,022 . 50 The above described work shall be incorporated in the Contract, referenced above, under the same conditions specified in the original Contract as amended unless otherwise specified herein. Any work not so specified shall be performed in accordance with the Standard Specifications adopted by the City of Shakopee, Minnesota. The amount of the Contract shall be (increased/Atmuexmat) by $ 1 022 . 50 The number of calendar days for completion shall be (increasedi}oex by -0- Original 0-Original Contract Amount: $ 170 ,643 . 75 Change Order(s) No. 1 thru 3 $ 6 ,812 . 50 Total Funds Encumbered $ 177 ,456 . 25 Completion Date: September 30 , 1981 The undersigned Contractor hereby agrees to perform the work specified in this Change Order in accordance with the specifications, conditions and prices specified herein. CONTRACTOR: 4f f e.4q/2"/) /4 ,&it) L �c APPROVED AND RECOMMENDED - BY: BY: Le+444.40,..), TITLE: 5E�/t ETjgiG DATE: /zol$ REVIEWED - CITY ENGINEER j -- - APPROVED - SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIE: COMMISSION APPROVED - CITY OF SHAKOPEE: an ger City Administrator Date Finance Director Gt Excerpt from September 9, 1981 Industrial/Commercial Committee Minutes ICC Motion Regarding the Existing IRB Policy in the City of Shakopee Motion was made by Paul Wermerskirchen, seconded by Don Woodward and passed to recommend that the City Council make no changes now to the City IRB policy, for the following reasons : 1. The present economy makes it an increasingly difficult ability to obtain permanent tax exempt financing, and if obtainable, this does not mean obtaining the interim financing even on a conventional basis. There are financial difficulties even with an IRB resolution. 2. Adding restrictions now will hinder development and could elinimate future tax base and jobs. 3. State policies on IRB's are under consideration for revision in the 1982 legislative session. Submitted by Glenda D. Spiotta, Recording Secretary GDS/jms ``40EilIrePi. CITY OF SHAKOPEE E -('J 41: s 129 East First Avenue Shakopee,pee, Minnesota 55379 /- VS/ �e; 7,3 r ,a�`� 01/140,„I -.......- MEMO TO: City Council FROM: Building Inspector SUBJECT: Access to Dressen Oil Co. DATE: September 2 , 1981 Introduction: The Dressen property which the City sold him does not have access 1 to a public road. Back Ground: As stated above, the property does not have access to a public road. The property fronts on Viking Drive but there is no rail- road crossing and the possibility of securing one is very remote. The road running north and south just east of Dressen Oil , is a private road owned by Viking Steel . Viking Steel has offered a most reasonable lease ($10.00 per year) to Mr. Dressen. Mr. Dressen does not want to enter into a lease agreement. He wants access from a public way. It should also be mentioned that the utility poles are on Viking • Steel property without benefit of a utility easement . Recommendation: Provide public access north and south from Highway 101 to E. 4th. Alternative : 1 . Buy back of the Dressen property. This would include relocation costs. 2 . Purchase a strip of land from Viking Steel to provide access to the Dressen and Viking property only and dedicate it as public access. Estimated cost , $5,000.00. 3. Condem the entire 1200 ' x 40' strip of Viking land on the easterly boundary and dedicate it. This would be contrary to the comp plan. It would also provide utility easement and north south access from Highway 101 and E. 4th St. Estimated cost, $35,000.00. 4. Enter into a long term lease agreement with Viking Steel , for the estimated economic life of the Dressen property. Estimated cost, $20,000.00. 5. Take the road by right of adverse possession. Foot Note: I checked with the City Attorney and he said the railroad cannot close off the existing crossing to the Viking Steel property. cc : Viking Steel 4\41Vc* ,,aF EN,r�P_ CITY H A d 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 MEMO TO: City Council FROM: Building Inspector SUBJECT: tlti i i ty Hnnk ups DATE: August 314_1981 Introduction: Establish criteria for mandatory utility hook up when utilities become available. Back Ground: We are spending money to install sewer and water lines and do not have a policy requiring residents to hook up to these lines. There currently is no policy which has lead to a hit and miss approach to the problem. Now, your latest action, re J . Nelson, appears to have negated the application of the Minnesota State Plumbing Code for future hook ups. Alternatives : 1 . None except continue on as you have in a hit miss, fashion 2. Pass an Ordinance establishing a hook up policy. Recommendation: Pass an Ordinance requiring the hook ups within two years after utility installation or when the well or septic system becomes defective, that clearly defines terms in the State Plumbing Code like feasible. Action Requested: Direct staff to draft an Ordinance covering Alternative #2 above. MEMO TO: John Anderson City Administrator FROM: H. R. Spurrier f City Engineer \I 4W RE: Metropolitan Council's "2k:" Water Quality Management Advisory Committee DATE: September 3, 1981 Introduction: Attached is an article from the Metro Monitor on the above-referenced advisory committee. The task of the committee is explained in the article. Background: The Committee lists four alternative methods for surface water management. I have worked with three of the four types of organizations proposed. My preference is for Alternate No. 1, a watershed management organization, because I have seen the success of these organizations in other parts of the country, but I viewed its success from a large community standpoint and recognize that most of the money is channeled toward the larger and rapidly developing communities and the distribution of construction funds is often less than equitable. Alternate No. 2 is nothing more than Alternate No. 1, except that additional control of development would be given to Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Alternate No. 3 is unacceptable simply because of the type of problem Shakopee presently has in developing within the Upper Valley Drainage Basin, given the fact that the undeveloped upper basin areas are reluctant to plan for future drainage needs, to enter into joint powers agreement or to accept responsibility for drainage. Finally, Alternate No. 4+ proposes county management of surface water, According to the article, joint powers agreements among local governments are required. On the other hand, if state legislation gave the counties the same power over surface water management that they now have over ditches, then the same administrative structure could be utilized in surface water management. Metropolitan Council proposes to adopt a surface water management section of its Water Quality Management Plan in January 1982. Therefore, it will be important to review the Committee recommendations when they take final form sometime in September. HBS/jiw Attachment UI a„ .Q lr. J. j t� OL G' �' td 'D CUIaflP Y ` • n• c a, x7tc0 o c : .- a G 7 OA i TA C -, t a _ • v • Q yj3 i scV' c Ub y .in -c • Cr's Cli) m cd a, Sc- a . 7c^ y1 9 p $y -' s ' C▪ T, � ..N E--4= , C' b y - oiu . ; �' = Yj p ` - ~ ' jy` a-o $ - - ^'rm.( aOoa ; � L a p A) AlcRyp v c _ cs Ste '.-. y� CO � ` o74G ,,0^J _UcyU ti; ^ E R S L _ r' i v a -Rv. a, C• . :44 Y n ° .. d CI''2_ ^ I`��r�� 1/ •(r°l O `''C - •U C y O c - C tV ▪ ! `,. O J oJ. C. += `7 i C : ^ ro '- v' i = _ y a pro ^ a, ^ • _L LO.0 .^ ••• y y y' 4, ,J -' ` $ ! O V cIf' - c = �,�' u y ' c d 4a $ ':3 0 V •-'z _G O b • -`O L 'D C 40 4, y c v, - - E c w - - U O d .c p• C O ., Y ^ 5 U N a, s•, Y •^ .`a ... ,12 R C Y W - :7 .. C 6, y > 7 '7 ro t s _ <7 v '� _ CLC 0 C1 E A �r v i. C ;� 3 7i t -. .,c; YRaa - LJ -. G"' RO .- V V Y R 'n = s 7 :a s QLI. C E- •n, .: 1 ti . = cd $ ._ . 44 -c-i. ✓ a Y ^ w a. v •o a R a, c a y vy y a ~ 0Y ^hyW ._ 0"Z. !i s r :c .. 7.:. co M O 4M _ E i C. G f:!, o of c3 .,w1421544 I�� $ R y a •i L L ` _ E :J O c 2, C O y R .= 1 L TJ L'• 4 . R C c T. C t Cr) \s/ y=yE ^ R C ^ y _ L E ... v R �° CO - ^ a y 3 . Jy CO• y v > •• ? i . R 3 J < y 'y 3 0 c1 .E _C =ro _>, O U C SL. R .. C 43. V E 0�... C R ^ $ b ',• �_ ro O • E �' �' ro C. '�'' C .. erj O ti R J = _ ��• ^ a. = - _ w 1, a ~ s 0�. _v a .'a • • 3 y m ° a o C ` O V a, i V O .3 V ✓, R L o Y y _ L ` Y 'O -C ^ C n J ; :h c- ,.._ -.. 2 Ct C:14U •C V c7 r. R i.- 4. R J - � a` C.' F" y1 y R �5 _ a� 3 !C_ • Cid o O ,, A i s y = c co c c v c .a •o o` ~'1 lirry O E -c - _ - •`- _ W = C .� O0 n ro E O • g v - d Y 0. N ✓ 1 0 $ Fliga4C i .� c .c :7 ? R :n '-- S Y 3 ? i y' -. 3`. 'O V x v O �. .. i 1. L, o- ec 7 . 7 a 6 3 O J _ , a. c� C c =`^ t r - ' s. C MC ✓ c ✓ = = _C $ •i y °C j U M ^ ? ✓ • _ CD � Oyio c Y s o L Ov .y v - ▪ Y _ ' ? , _ E J ` ` tJ Y c -0 ` R tt ., O a^`.4t t .'a o O - fO . ! P2 �c -:--- •^I .' yt- E ° cE 4.- 7 `a 'O _ 7 o E , > .e0 a a _ _ C..) •C 1 . 3 s Z :4° G d $ U i _ C C d u .`_^' w a .. O "Jr W I U of -: Z iiiiia.4 i t•-•1:::• ' .t ! t/ ,1 C' 1 n 'I ,I , • t 17 , ,e i 1' 1 0 t1,14,,, ....1 , 4 14''*fk it'' '' .r 3 r n E 1 4 rr� • 4% tb tv tiS iQo W r r. -t' „I.. .� � tyh �r '1 �• nU7 PS ;'1 I I I : 1°oir • ,`I �ivAff ,4**"*.�:•`21 •iii .9adlMj� ,'.,.r. i y 0 O ! , ". 1•••Y,..,112w-slim, • • i Z ••' ~0 W ' 1 J .Nc0 it r. O flay t ,,,. �r • ..� t. t i �Yx0 _y" •� • r °„ , � ' 4� m•.' k i�'r�'.. , "` y,4 v1.�N•:A.� .,LR f''iitt , i .17',t C•.., , :+` rt' j • ?:; .• ' t. •' � .� a, �( • rV\ '14r ,t. •T a..w } a�t ..r •7t ' r,..1011,* },, �.4 1y'i Y........4^ .. m `YS C 1�e� r` ° + y t i ' 1 'I 11�1s1 1,1'(� ;f 1 •-•:-.0%.:41/10?,-.ta�. I•4. p` q aG lel rY, , .,� �� � '+;�` iy,`I.,, ►. 4. I '•.5 ''i, t ,C y, ~� :t W.0- • ' dilig , , �,i 1 1 °i, 't _f al , k1 I i• , t 1 I •; yep w, 1.'. b - u c`. 'tEP i r 'i,:- ye a ) ' i A���I y ) t r'r , ,i i. t I ,.I� ', ' �'Y '°c` o i /yIli'l 1 '1i ;i{]] t r rLL� 4F 4E,a ';+ •.:94. . J�!J� ,i !,"Ill , , .`� 1 • �'t...11' Qy � 7F_ • • ...>W N C d V A. CI '� _!G > O ."' y 2s +S•' s co V .d, d 7 d'� C •V op..�«.OS S d ONp CcaEo ° EE� -, a, 0E .5eoe 3TL 0 _ .._, _ eoao pc moo ^o, ,c, a, ° N a do y Q ca 40 t C c �o O 3 a .00. cn c c ~ > a dp.' C y0 _ E E '-. a 7 .+ O O c0.c y, Q. a L ..- p_ o o C QEccp a C as7 � EOi° d .s tvcF' y ° E r -"oa, '� � :=.�, `-• co� a, .= a -'- •o E d a, � r. K u eo._ .. >, o- c a, 0 E o 7 c>> — ave oao °-4 3 E 7 > • `° m ..,.0� a ooc lao ea Da 0 ,'..- C 7 �a,± s.0 •a : y. ! co p E 3A o 3 � � �� o •n 3 _C O o C C .Ca •E C V c o >, °N asy cad '-' >' ° e�1 t- y - a E c v U 7 y ;., a s _ W mea _'C >,..., p CO aac. s .' ,S' ,C •N • N v a, — y 3 = v'9 C 'n 7 o •a, LC". ... 7_, C a ti •� D.b O'�>—, aCi V y d >, O E a C C y _ 'p 0. t C O •— O O ea V 7 to _, = E" � Ec' ' 3 � ._ oa R � y 3 • n _ _.b � coeaVaE � Sot'' y•cCjc � =° a cv . O .c a a ._ a O as 7 a, a, • a c.... co ce y ., w a ' " a a 00 -0 3 F C — op a 'C' .0 w y .y., > 9 'c c ya PC;- v ai ►: E a > ca > 4. .N C .D 0 a ca...., .. 'y 7 in ... C E.0 V os Z , y„ y x -cra 00 Coy a .saC, C �, eano a x V,... E ,n ._ — E .. - C ? , C ea °° tiC ti •0E VE ;; >, E E . .,,,_,,, -5Et. taco cu 70 a s io u a.,, .0 a E a� C ••c ;. E E co '- = o °; an os O C C1 E CSU ,,, ,�.0 3� .' a.' d ._ R v7, y .. � i � O O..) 0 o— d a `� 'C � 3 v 3 U ,, aEi s E y y U . � E K c .0 C •et C aI. > C — ya, V .' 3 .. .0 ,- K "C .' a a E `' E a ''�6.. °i OV E O ccaa E ccaa ea110b°n E ° aa. - .E :. .r.c0 ea -u E. cn 'F CD a y 7 .t.'w E_" O :i] ° 0 E N y 3 CL y 0 ZE 7 .O �%, 7 a, O > 7t„ O O..0 O C .C" L .a' i- C 3 — i d C ,• y !1• C C O a 7 'u p ._ s 3 ad > a a n o ea a a.+ •• C U 3 .E a 3 oaoca :n =a _ C c Ko c 6 o K i 3 v ct do oa 07 aK 7o a s Co eZ Q •,>—, Uta ca y C ? O > E v y K O a w 7,-, >O w y .0 C A •E c. E c4 K r C Z C E C 3 'D a.0 U A �,•O O _ .. V •Cy .A .54 @ y .'^' E Cl.) 0 co a, `.° a .o a`, i +a•, CO fa, .4tEc. s o 0 'v c p aa a > c . O V —' y A a > a s .0 > a, v .0 V C a s C a C ,c�V U �° a n E 3,- i � � a" E c Ei � Vac ca> 0 E � ;n' Ka • Cs. c v� L • y o V cya 7 .'' V �' .� o�' 0- E E s > •n• 2 0 ° O ct L C F • -• U w 3 0 a o 3 ,n no ..,.. i a a 3 0 Ws C E v 3 .- c E' ea � 3 ,- 3cd3 Hca o .. -- .' C a • oay o = o7r= V c`°i NV - a C „ >, ayyo � � Eo .�? " C K y — V _ 'C , O ad _. p O m a V d p w C ::, V 7 a, ..., :, K 61 •a a °a.0a .oCeaac.) cccaC He svC EQE .' vw� � pO ' � c b CD w K ._ o a to 'C .2., c ao .. +.s C (� O •� ca •>_ U 0. 0 0 E C c o c.0 y q `� �a a 7 a C ea C = y O. 00 w ., a E •- U CZ c a E a, 'C O�- U C 'C p U Q 0 7 .0 •C ca > .0 V .f E O ca �1I . C 'Z^ a y a, a s C U V 7 .G C C C •- ._ 0 3 C .' a V .a, c •c E , y, ,, > C a > a .p a o.0 c a C C 7 a , ,� C a _ i7' U m a c�U c, p3 •o aFP uoocKa .O � v � 03 mw 3 OS Es 3 I. P: E VS -r- (2!-k MEMO TO: John Anderson City Administrator FROM: H. R. Spurrier q r �- City Engineer RE: 1981 Seal Coat Program DATE: September 4, 1981 Introduction: The Engineering Department did not prepare a list of streets to be seal coated for 1981. That list was not prepared because of several problems. Background: Analysis of past seal coat work indicated that the seal coat program was not performing all of the desired functions of a seal coat. That function is to provide skid resistance and seal the surface to prevent saturation of sub-grade materials by surface waters. The analysis also indicated that some streets were being treated more than once every five years. A five year interval is ordinarily used for seal coat programs. The analysis also indicated that nearly one-third of the City's streets had not be sealed since their construction. In looking at the streets that needed to be sealed, either because they had not been sealed previously or because the surface was in poor condition or because the surface had not been sealed for more than five years, I found a map that included most of the City streets. The worst streets have been identified. However, this is not to say that a seal coat is the most appropriate way to correct the problems on the streets. Knowing the correct maintenance to perform on these streets requires a comprehensive analysis of the pavement and sub-grade. Such an analysis is proposed in the 1982 Capital Improvement Project list requested by the Engineering Department and the Public Works Department. In 1981, the Engineering Department and the Public Works Department is not staffed to perform that analysis. If the analysis remains in the 1982 Capital Improvement Project list, it could be performed in early 1982. The unallocated funds in the Street Maintenance Budget that would have been encumbered for the seal coat program will be required for the maintenance identified by the comprehensive study. However, at this point, the best use of the funds has not been identified. John Anderson September 4, 1981 1981 Seal Coat Program Page -2- Recommendation: It is the recommendation of City Staff that the unexpended seal coat funds be reallocated and added to the 1982 Seal Coat Budget. HRS/jiw ,.�„cf.{k%„o CITY OF SHAKOPEE ▪ i r- .�' 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 914 •1 `▪ � 1 `i�� i ss‘._ [� 5lt— \` MEMO '0: .7nhn 7m1ercn ROM: Pnhl i r Wnrks nep± :UBJECT:. - . . ` . • _ _ aATE:_ Sept- 9, 1981 INTRODUCTION: Weeds or grass growing through cracks in concrete or bituminous surfaces are a common occurence in late summer, particularly when the roadway has a poor base or sub-grade. If a bituminour surface hasn' t been treated with a seal coat in recent years, the oil in the asphalt will dry out, causing the bituminous surface to contract and begin cracking. This situation is very noticeable where the edge of the roadway produces a crack next to the concrete gutter of the curb section. The cracks, of course, offer entry of surface water into the base, compounding the problems. T ALTERNATIVES : 1. The most logical and effective solution to eliminate excessive cracking of bituminous surface is to construct the road surface with a good granular sub-grade, strong base, and a thick asphalt surface. The only cracking to be noticed with this type of roadway, would be next to the concrete gutter. This is where contraction and expansion will be noticed. i- 2. 2. An effective seal coat program is a must to properly maintain a good surface. The oil in the sealcoat rejuvenates the oil in the existing asphalt, thereby giving the bituminous surface new life and flexibility. The seal coat, when applied properly, overlaps the edge of the gutter to effectively seal the edge of the bituminous from water entering the base. It is generally the policy of most maintenance departments to thoroughly patch and seal any cracks on on the roadway to be sealed, thus assuring themselves that the section of roadway will be effectively patched every 4 or 5 years, which is the normal seal coat cycle. 3. On occasion, a 1” to 11” asphalt overlay is applied, especially when more surface strength is needed. The overlay is feathered at the gutter section to maintain an adequate crown. Considerable studies have been conducted in comparing the effectiveness of an overlay as opposed to seal coat programs, particularly because of the escalating cost of oil for seal coat. 4 . Crack filling programs in other communities are pretty much the sames as employed in Shakopee. In checking with other nearby communities, I find that our treatment of crackfilling is basically the same as these other agencies. Crack .filling with oil and sand after grouting isn' t done by street maintenance personnel anymore because it is time consuming and is subject to further cracking as soon as the sub-grade moves again. Crackfilling is now incorporated into patching programs where the worst cracks are cleaned and fill with bituminous fine mix instead of just oil and sand. A more intensified repair program is employed on the streets which are scheduled for the current seal coat program. This program consists of cleaning and filling the cracks, leveling humps, filling depressions or sunken crowns, as well as raising sunken curb and gutter sections, where needed. With this schedule, we know that each street will receive a concentrated repair program on each scheduled seal coat year. We have neither the manpower, time, or money in our maintenance budget to concentrate on each street, other than to fill potholes, depressions , and the cracks each year. 5. Cut grass growth with a flat bladed hand shovel. This method, of course, would involve a tremendous amount of manpower, and would have to be done several times a season. The grass growing in the cracks of the sidewalk and curb sections on 10th Ave. , was cut by hand once already this season, it has since grown back. 6. Chemical application to the grass growth can produce possible harmful effects to the surrounding environment because a good portion of the application will wash away from the surface, run into the gutters and storm sewer system, and find its way into the nearby river, possibly affecting wildlife and habitat. We have, on occasion, applied a herbicide with a Hudson sprayer, however, this method is very time consuming. RECOMMENDATION: A consistent 4 to 5 year seal coat program is the most effective method of maintaining a healthy bituminous surface, to keep life in the asphalt, to provide added protective road surface, and to seal the road edge to the curb and gutter from water entry. We can' t afford to skip yearly seal coat programs anymore because once a street is deleted from a scheduled protective seal, we seem to never catch up in the maintenance cycle. If some streets are scheduled to be improved on a Capital Improvement program, we have an obligation to protect and maintain the old surface as long as possible, until the improvement program is implemented. Once a street is overlooked in a maintenance cycle, the cost of repairing the street is then reflected in our general fund maintenance budget. MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM:- John Anderson City Administrator RE : Hiring Procedures DATE: August 25, 1981 Introduction : At the conclusion of City Council ' s July 21 , 1981 meeting, following the hiring of a Secretary to fill a regular full- time employees slot vacated by a resignation, City Council asked that the City Administrator outline the City' s hiring procedures . Philosophy : Prior to reading the procedures suggested below, Council should consider carefully the level of involvement they wish to have in the personnel selection process . Whatever level Council chooses should reflect the emphasis in terms of time and effort Council feels it can devote to the subject . Procedure : The list below represents my perception of how the process "should" function. Many of the steps are already included in our present procedures . I have included some comments to explain the reasoning behind the procedure. The procedure is for full- time permanent employees . 1 .0 Position is vacated by resignation 1 . 1 City Council is notified at their next regular meeting and acts on resignation. (Note : If City Council does not wish to fill the position, change it or delay filling it , it will direct staff to stop advertising process at this point) . 1 . 2 _Immediately after the receipt of a formal resignation, the City Administrator will check the Budget/Personnel Resolution and if it is a full-time permanent position notices will be posted in all city work places for five (5) days . (Note : to wait for Council action could mean a 2 week delay9 . Hiring Procedures August 25, 1981 • Page Two 1 . 3 Any qualified City employee can apply for the position bj submitting a completed application. 1 .4 At the end of the five (5) day period the department head involved will review any City employee applications and Will decide to: a. Interview the City employee(s) . b. Advertise . If the department head decides to advertise he will notify the City Clerk (and City Administrator) who will in turn notify the employee(s) who applied. All City employee applicants will then be included with the group of finalists interviewed for the position. 1 .5 An application file will be started containing all pertinent information regarding the position. 2 .0 Advertising for the vacant position 2 . 1 The City Clerk will prepare and publish the ad in the news- paper. 2 . 2 The City shall advertise in the local newspaper and in any other publication that is deemed appropriate for the position. The position shall be advertised for a minimum two week period beginning at time of publication in the Shakopee Valley News . (Applications received for positions will be kept on file for one year. ) 2 . 3 All applications received by the date included in the ad will be keep in an application file in the Clerk' s office. 'Note : all routine personnel matters are centralized in the City Clerk' s office) . 2 .4 All questions regarding the ad or the position will be directed to the City Clerk and may be refered to appropriate department head. 3 .0 Screening 3 . 1 After the application deadline the Clerk will present the applications to the department head and City Adminis- trator who will jointly screen the applicants as provided in Section 4 Subd. 1 of the City' s Personnel Policy. 3 . 2 If there is to be any tests administered they will be conducted by the City Clerk, scored and presented to the department head and City Administrator for further screening. • 3 . 3 Applicants that are candidates for interviews will be presented to the Clerk who will schedule the interviews . 4.0 Selection 4. 1 After the department head and City Administrator have decided upon a candidate to be offered the job they will Hiring Procedures August 25 , 1981 Page Three decide upon a salary to be offered within the appropriate salary range and the department head (or City Clerk) will make the offer pending City Council approval . 4.2 City Council will be presented with a staff memo covering .the hiring process , eg. date of advertising, number of applicants , screening and interviewing process , qualifica- tions of the recommended applicant and recommended starting date and salary prepared by the City Clerk. 4. 3 City Council action. a. City Council can approve the recommendation by simple motion and the Clerk will notify the applicant the following day (followed by a formal letter of employ- ment and preliminary employment papers) . b. City Council can adjust the recommended starting salary should they find reason to do so. c . City Council can reject the recommendation should they find a reason to do so, and instruct the City Adminis- trator to come back with a new recommendation . (Note : Because City Council does not participate in the screen- ing process , it is difficult for Council to make a knowledgeable selection of the best qualified person even if all or some of the Council members know some of the applicants because they are City employees or acquaintances . That ' s why I 'm advocating the practice of explaning the reasons for rejecting the recommended candidate . A Council member may indeed have factual information that staff has overlooked that warrents further investigation and this should be reviewed and brought back to a subsequent meeting. ) 5.0 Upon reporting to work on the first day, a new employee shall be sent to the City Clerk' s office for completion of necessary forms . Summary : This draft proceedure can be altered cr amended as Council desires . It is written based upon the assumption that Council wants to minimize its involvement while preserving the final approval on any full-time permanent employees hired . This procedure does not cover part--time or seasonal personnel who rre recruited, hired and fired strictly by administrative action without Council involvement when it is for a budgeted position(s) . Action Requested : Direct staff to draft a resolution incorporating the proposed hiring procedures for presentation at the next City Council meeting. JKA/jms MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Bonding for Link Judgment DATE: . September 4, 1981 Introduction The Council has decided to recover the costs of the Link Judgment through levying tax dollars in support of a bond issue . The bonds have not been issued to date . Background Reference the attached letter from Springsted. In addition to the information contained therein, Mr. Shannon has informed me that Council could authorize the bonds , thereby providing a basis for the tax levy for 81/82 but delay issuing the bonds for a short period of time to see if the market improves . Schedule D is the lowest cost to the taxpayer and is a 3 year schedule . Alternatives 1 . Do nothing at this time, issue bonds in 1982 and possibly combine with other projects . However, City will be short the cash that much longer and lose interest earnings . 2 . Proceed with issuing bonds now. 3 . Authorize bonds but delay issuance for the near future . 4. Select- schedule A, B, C, or D for financing. Recommendation Staff recommends authorizing the issuance of bonds now under schedule D and issuing the bonds in the near future . This will lay the subject to rest and restore lost interest income to other funds . Action Move to direct staff to have a resolution prepared authorizing the issuance of bonds at a date in the near future for a three year issue with level principal payments . GV/jms SPRINGSTED _ rt 5f:1 v ED ?K INCORPORATED PUBLIC FINANCE SEP 4 1961 ADVISORS CITY OF SHAKOPEE 2 September 1981 Mr. Greg Voxland Finance Director City Hall 129 East First Avenue Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 RE: Judgement Bonds (Link Brothers Inc.) We understand the City has paid the judgement and associated costs for this litigation out of current available funds of the City and would like to recover such funds expended through the issuance of bonds. Further, that the City intends to recover the expenditures over a 3 to 5 year period through a general ad valorem tax levy. Pursuant to your letter to Mr. Pulscher dated July I, 1981, the costs to be included in the issue are as follows: Judgement Principal $131 ,347.91 Interest 16,740.69 Legal Fees 7,362.77 Subtotal $155,451 .37 Issuance Costs 6,500.00 Allowance for Discount 3,200.00 Subtotal $165, 151 .37 Less: Accrued Interest 151 .37 Total Bond Issue $165,000.00 As you know, the municipal bond market is under severe pressure with record high interest rates. We estimate a three-year issue maturing in 1985 would command a coupon interest rate of approximately 11.00% and a 5-year issue maturing in 1987 a coupon interest rate of I I.25%. If the market continues to deteriorate, these bonds may approach the 12% interest rate limitation for Minnesota bonds. We have enclosed a series of maturity schedules depicting the projected annual levy requirements for the issue depending on the length you desire. We would recommend the issuance of bonds at this time only if the City desires to recover the cash outlay immediately. However, if there is not a pressing need for funds, we do not recommend a sale at this time. As mentioned hereinbefore, the municipal bond market is currently in disarray. While there are no positive signs of improvement, some of the pressures on the short-term rates should abate toward the end of the year when the U.S. Treasury will not 800 Osborn Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 (612) 222-4241 Mr. Greg Voxland 2 September 1981 Page 2 be seeking new funds to maintain its programs (hopefully). While the delay approach is a gamble on future interest rates, we do not recommend to commit to definitive financing at these high interest rates unless it is necessary to proceed in order to provide needed funds. We do recommend the City make a levy this year, however, so that funds will be available to pay debt service on the bonds when they are issued. Pursuant to current statutes, the City can issue these bonds through negotiation since the size of the issue is less than $200,000. In essence, the negotiated sale does not require a publication of notice of sale or competitive bidding. Upon notification of your desire to proceed, we will distribute pertinent information to the underwriters in the Twin City area and request bids to be submitted to our office by a certain time and date. We then inform you of the results, if any, and the Council would then proceed to pass a resolution calling for the sale of the bonds and awarding them to the successful bidder. Proceeds would then be available approximately 30 days after the sale. Should you have any questions regarding this issue, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ( Gerard B. Shannon Assistant Vice President /agh Enclosures CITY OF SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA PREPARED SEPTEMBER 2, 1981 $165 , 000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BY SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED FUNDING BONDS OF 1981 SCHEDULE A DATED: 11/ 1/1981 MATURE: 2/ 1 11 . 000% COUPON LEVY LEVY MATURE PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL (105%) (1 ) (2) (3) (4 ) (5) (6) 1981 1983 45 , 000 22 , 688 67 , 688 71 , 072 1982 1984 55, 000 13 , 200 68 , 200 71 , 610 1983 1985 65, 000 7 , 150 72 , 150 75, 758 TOTALS : $165 , 000 $43 , 038 $208 , 038 $218 , 440 BOND YEARS: 391 COUPON INTEREST COST: $43 , 038 AVERAGE MATURITY: 2. 37 DISCOUNT (PREMIUM) : 3, 200 AVG . ANNUAL RATE: 11 . 818% TOTAL INTEREST COST: $46, 238 AVERAGE ANNUAL LEVY REQUIRED $68 , 200 (COLUMN 5 , LEVY YEARS 1982 THRU 1982) AVERAGE WITH 5% OVERLEVY $71 , 610 (COLUMN 6 , LEVY YEARS 1982 THRU 1982) q PC CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA PREPARED SEPTEMBER 2, 1981 $165 , 000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BY SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED FUNDING BONDS OF 1981 SCHEDULE B DATED: 11/ .1/1981 MATURE: 2/ '1 11 . 250% COUPON LEVY LEVY MATURE PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL (105%) ( 1 ) (2 ) (3) (4 ) (5) (6 ) 1981 1983 25, 000 23 , 203 48 , 203 50 , 613 1982 1984 30 , 000 15 , 750 45, 750 48 , 038 1983 1985 35 , 000 12, 375 47 , 375 49, 744 1984 1986 35, 000 8 , 438 43 , 438 45 , 610 1985 1987 40 , 000 4 , 500 44 , 500 46 ,725 TOTALS : $165 , 000 $64 , 266 $229 , 266 $240 , 730 BOND YEARS : 571 COUPON INTEREST COST: $64 , 266 AVERAGE MATURITY: 3. 46 DISCOUNT (PREMIUM) : 3 , 200 AVG . ANNUAL RATE: 11 . 810% TOTAL INTEREST COST: $67 , 466 AVERAGE ANNUAL LEVY REQUIRED $45 , 521 (COLUMN 5 ., LEVY YEARS 1982 THRU 1984 ) AVERAGE WITH 5% OVERLEVY $47 , 797 (COLUMN 6 , LEVY YEARS 1982 THRU 1984 ) CITY OF SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA PREPARED SEPTEMBER 2, 1981 $165 , 000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BY SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED FUNDING BONDS OF 1981 SCHEDULE C DATED: 11/. 1/1981 MATURE : 2/' 1 11 . 250% COUPON LEVY LEVY MATURE PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL (105%) ( 1 ) (2 ) (3 ) (4 ) (5) (6 ) 1981 1983 30 , 000 23, 203 53 , 203 55, 863 1982 1984 30 , 000 15 , 188 45 , 188 47 , 447 1983 1985 35, 000 11 , 813 46 , 813 49, 154 1984 1986 35, 000 7 , 875 42 , 875 45, 019 1985 1987 35, 000 3 , 938 38 , 938 40, 885 TOTALS : $165 , 000 $62, 017 $227 , 017 $238 , 368 t BOND YEARS : 551 COUPON INTEREST COST: $62 , 017 AVERAGE MATURITY : 3 . 34 DISCOUNT (PREMIUM) : 3, 200 AVG . ANNUAL RATE: 11 . 830% TOTAL INTEREST COST: $65, 217 AVERAGE ANNUAL LEVY REQUIRED $44 , 959 (COLUMN 5 , LEVY YEARS 1982 THRU 1984 ) AVERAGE WITH 5% OVERLEVY $47 , 207 (COLUMN 6 , LEVY YEARS 1982 THRU 1984 ) /� CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA PREPARED SEPTEMBER 2, 1981 $165 , 000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BY SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED FUNDING BONDS OF 1981 SCHEDULE D DATED: 11/ 1/1981 MATURE: 2/ 1 11 . 000% COUPON LEVY LEVY MATURE PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL (105%) (1 ) (2) (3) (4 ) (5) (6 ) 1981 1983 55, 000 22, 688 77 , 688 81 , 572 1982 1984 55 , 000 12, 100 67 , 100 70 , 455 1983 1985 55, 000 6, 050 61 , 050 64 , 103 TOTALS : $165, 000 $40 , 838 $205, 838 $216, 130 BOND YEARS : - 371 COUPON INTEREST COST: $40, 838 AVERAGE MATURITY: 2. 25 DISCOUNT (PREMIUM) : 3, 200 AVG . ANNUAL RATE: 11 . 862% TOTAL INTEREST COST: $44 , 038 AVERAGE ANNUAL LEVY REQUIRED $67 , 100 (COLUMN 5 , LEVY YEARS 1982 THRU 1982) AVERAGE WITH 5% OVERLEVY $70 , 455 (COLUMN 6 r LEVY YEARS 1982 THRU 1982) 4/41.1444411.44.1111.11011.611ligat 4 _ _ -, ,________, . . tJ w AJ 4. , NJ...I r.) r) . Ti NJ ,J ,..1 • ,J N3 • N.) NJ ra ,J NJ NJ Ps) NJ ,J NJ tJ • NJ .- . . .3 . :A • LA .J LA Ln • LA :..:1 cr.....1 • ...0 cn • Ln Ln_n -11••7 ••••1 ,J1 ,J1 :J1 ....11 (Ji • ..n 11 ,J . Le.1 • 1.../ • LA.LA 1.4 LA • LA LA L4 LA • LA(4 • L4 (4 LA LA(A1 (A(A LA (A LA(4 • LA 0 0 .. • 1 • .1 1 •) '1 • (-1 9 1 S so 1' '1 :• ) -1 .1 ' ."1 4-. . , . C' • .0 • A A A A • LA 14 LA L4 A LAI-A • (\.) (,...4 tJ rJ IL) ea na Ii N) NI NJ .. • NJ cl • • .., . P) • 1,.9,1".1 I-A o • :1 ,, _ri ,P • (4 LA • -4 44 -....1! 0' U‘ :::' J, 0' J, J, a. • P 44 2 --/ _) -C • I • . . • . 0 i . , , 0 -I • - •' ..•... (' L..: : .1 (-).-_,i • 7 • ,C ..3 1J..0 cio ...J .3 ...... '0 .4 . '055.4 'a.: 'S.4 .51; 41 ,,. ..J ‘,.1 ,II •1J '....3 •43 , .1 -4 (55 .P. 4, s4,', 4. 4, 'Ps ... '. 4.. ! 44 4, '4 '.. ..... ,.. ', St .4.,P4 '-'4 ../. s4 , - 19 0 . 44 44 PAs OA PA oAs 44 0... .• 1.4 : I.4 1.4 ' PA 4A 4A 1 14 PA 4A PA 4A PA 0-. 0+ -. T. i ...• ., .,.., .0 ,... '..• ,-. -.4s_. -4 L.La, ...,s.! .J ...3,.. s) /-1 LA ! 1 .44 •••• Ps• As. As• !,.. 4' .4. '.4.--. 4'-... ! .41 •14./os' .... .N. '... '... ••••• -... 0 .0 .... .0.4.4 02 .0 .0 .0 -.0 .4 ' 0 .0 ; •7 77 2 1 2 .0 2 77 73 2 77 77 2 1) ,• I .... ... ......... •-• .... ...0. •-•.- 0.*4 : .. 44 44: 44 PA 44 44"A. 44 4...1.4 , I-• in • i I i . I • i . • I I 1 ' 1 1 , . • • , I . , . • • . I i • • • i , I . . , • . . • ; • • r. ' , , i • . . , • • . • I ' , : 2 • ; 33 0 . I , , , • ' ' - - C . ; : • • , ;PA , . • 2 . • , ; . . ' L.. NJ...... ..•-• , NJ NJ .1,IA OA ! 1 ...' .111 ..P,• -4 I D .4.4 50 CO 0 0' 0' LA'CA La 0 1-..'0 4- 31 Is)Ln.0 - na NJ , Is)NJ L4 . CA (A N4 ' Ca Oa • .4 .0 ..0, • Ln J2 *A F... J.a al 4.. g•...a .A 0m ,A 1 .0,0 43 i n)'A :_r4-41 LA LA NI Ln D 0, 0 LA na I .0 .0 • • • • • •0 • • • '1r ' • • • • • • • • • 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • , ••••• ...•1-. '.J .J NJ L4 L4 1.0,L, at cft,c, a,O ,, na 40 LA LA•4 CA.4; LA 0 Ln CA J*'LA 4/ ._,LA i ra rJ• •• .Ji LA .6 4. -4 0 U "a., IIJ N;(.7 0..... 0 ; 77 r4(3, , (.40' NI(A I r) 4....) ..c. 4.41 4-* c.r4 :71 0 N I 0 Ul I • . f , . . • i • • • 1 • • *; • ; • • : , • . , • , • • , . • i . 4 i . • • , . . , • . . ' , • • . , • . . , , • • . . . . . I . . • , : . . • , . • , • • . • -4, al > 0 D. 0 C. C. Jr. T. IC SC I C. C. C. 04 1. z. Y.1. I. 0 0 • : rs.• I 33 0 C) C) 13 C 00 C51s/) • 0 0 mon in 1 c c c o c c o c . 0 • • -( -c .01 n --4 II co UI , r'r. 1 0 0 r.• -4 -1-4.4•-4-4 -4 ...4 ' (A l• .4 00 0 0 22 00 • -4-4 I :7 2 2 I 0 Ca (a 0 0 C) 0 Ca . 0 ;7. r1 1 .1 z CII') ' i z z z! ; r) < x 1 .0 rn X 7; • • 10 0 ; 111 i 1 rn nnonon (-1 CI I .-. In 1. -( 44.-4 C) z • • .2 2 1 r1 r: , rn r1 ri 1',rl i 1 r1 ni 0 z ;-, .0 .0 0 r1 (1 1') X X ' T• 11. r•; zzzzzzzz ; -4 o ' n C 2 2 2 77 0•r• CII') •lr', • Z z z; i PI 0 I A ..: • • 0 0 22 II • .0 .0 : 0 0 0: 7777777777 .7722 0 -o I I'I U) -1 ...0 00 • • • 2 2 :17 .0 1 1 x• 0 D. 0 D. 11 l• 14 . n CI r4 • Ill,) r, r) 0 10 rn rn In; f-r' f"r-r' r" r' r- . n. I la • XS 77 00 22 . I . 0 rn -4 .4 0 0 2 2 0 (4(4 0 LI 0 0 (A 13 n II. -." 0 0 -4-4 ; • • CCCCCCCC • . 2 X • (A n 22 11 • . . z r• * • • • • , -0 -0 "0 -0,-0 -0 -0-0 I- z . r-r- r-r- r-r r-r- -4 In . •• -4 -4 -4 -4 -;( -4 -4 -4 ' . 0 , .4 I , . , . , ' I • L4 , ;• -4 • . 1 I , rl 77 • , . . . . ' . 77 ,.4 00 0 < (4-4 21 -4-4 - - -4.4 < < <nn r,1,1 CA CI '0 " ! Us r 11 -1 Ci 11, CIXr• rn XX ' 13 A7 aa rn rn f", 0 0 7e fl • ts -4 ' -n -n cc I I .c. o •-n r:* or 10 0 D.; SISCCC1• 2 -44 tri 0 • .4...4 CI • 0< Cl C << ' < < <: • • • 004 1.4 1.1 4--Ci n I • CII') = o ri • z In m (11 r1 ri, z -0 z r 77 •'7 LC 1,1 I' 2 1-r- C r'r- I- t-r'• 1 2 2 • • • 10 .-. 0 D X. CI D. 0• 2 (4 0 a 0 -,r- z Cl -1 ...... (51 (4 0 0. rn a '.. rim ri In r.1: .-....-. 2120 • 0' 0 . 'I 2 C C 2 Z 711 X .-. '0 X X , X X A. 2227. 000N ("1 = -1 '01 0 -4 '0 2 t"' 11 13 17 17; ...,.4 ..6 04.1 44 44 r" c: 2' 77 -• • 11 -1 • r) 111 -•C ri fn rn ri rn I • • • Z z z 1 v• 4-4 I., r r- • ro z • 1 22 , A 2 2' -• -1 -1 '0 1 -i 17 • .. .0 '-4 Po/ V. 2 0 g. 77 01 01 , CA 02 Li' go re po o • • Cr 11 -4 A In rn -Tr rl • IX(X ! r'l rn rn• az 1.4 '3 44 •70 (4(4 33 • 73CI 73 77 73 lis it.el Cl rn • P4 0 CI r1 17 . . I• • • rn rn rn ; .0 (4 1. 2 ! "0 17 -UI" , • • , 1.1'1:1 -0 7:7 77 73 0 , r'• . • • A , . • • • ri m In 0 0• I • . 2 • '0'17 -0 rn • ; , • . .• • • • rn ' • • • • , . . • , . • • ; ; . • • • . . • . . , 0 0 c cm 0 .7-.)4, ,..:',c= ' 0 0 , P. 0 Ci C3 C5 ,I CI'0-, ,J CI • , 0-,' t• , • ..• 0.. 0+P.. as ..• ,... 4- PA PA " 4*44 • LA 1.4.0+1 0.0+ i 1.0 ( . I I I 1 ,1 1 1 1 I I I , I 1 1 ' 14111441 I I CI i , a a a a 0 a .0 .0 .0(4 a.. ! pa ! .0.40 410 A.'0 a 0 J. , a• 0 • .....1 ro N 1.7 (.1) N .4 1.4 (4 PA {AO(AP I (04(.4 LA: N N N Ps)NJ NJ AJ na na C ; P 1.4 0.Pm P+ LA 4) /A cot 1.4 . (4(4 LA LA(At (.4(4 10/(AI 4.4‘4 IV IV . a .‘ " ..1 (1./ 0 0 a% ru o c 1.•. (.4 • 0 C, ! ca C,C,! IV IV N CI 0 0 4.11 Cr ; 0..• .4 1 1 1 1 •I 1 1 1 1 1 I I : I I I I 1 1 1 ;1 1 I I • I • 0 40 '0(4 (A (A PA I+ 0+ C2 CII 4, 0 L4(0 CA a 4.m 0 0 0 z • I LO N 0.e... 0 •-• !V IQ CO (A) • 4.11 01 '0114 isi i (N)IV••••454(V NJ .0 N , IN 0 4 0. "I'.. 0% N 0.0. 0+Ca , I.••-• 4*LA 041 4*04 04 .4 • ' . I I I • 1 I •1 1 1 II 1 • III : 1 1 1 1 Il 1 1 1 i 1 II. 1 0.(.4 -V (... •-• ... 0. o . Cr• a , ..N)O., a Ca VI (7%a La 1 Jr, -a 4-6 . 0 N I.•..... ... ... 1%3 N ;71 0 LA 0, ' .4) (asp.,), IV 15)P• O.)1S.)11.) a IL) I. ft.) z , *c • I • . . • z a , • , • . • . . •••• ,-• , • , I 07 0 . , le 0 .4 4- . 41 ! 'II 1 I • 0 I--C1 • Oa . a I-• 2 rn 17 44 1* ; • * • s • • * CO CI • • • . • • • • • • . . a ("1 ! • • • r • s GI i ' I 4 1 1 , 1 . rn I') ; r)• r) r) r) r) X . X • x 0 . • 0 • in 0 (A • 0' 4- 1 , • . • . . . . ... _ . . .. J F U .l J 4 ^ > > 1 > 5.---= - > I ] - A 4 tUI_ i ) i A ) f . ) 1N .. • . a - .2 i .. ]: J ' . ' - Al •; h• • NN• • N • N NN N N • N VNN NN :• NN -• N W • r f •1 'f • ljl'1' • N • 01 J1 ii UI .1 • U1 UI UI•U) (11 UI • UI 4.1 • Ui Ui • P1 J i • G ►; U' • (w 41 • 4 • ,L4 :A U 44 • U 1A 4.4 4U • (A A • 4 u S )3 1. •! ' • J r.. • 1 4. 1 .) .7 J • i J :f .1 ..l .4 ,• 3•J • 4.'.) • 11 • .j • W' • d .J • A • 1.43222 = • v -4 -.11-4 r v • S 0` • 0•a (") - a• • t.1 • t• C..: • - • N tJ:J N rJ • u 4 4 4 N N I• a J • 0. a ,• IC (2 I , r I • ! •4 ! ..• .J .2 ..a .0 J ..i .D I •:1 :A•u 1.0 .0 .i .D .D .0 .0 -4 01 "... •••. • �N.�I% - . �� rti S •-• H r~•' • a• ..,r r•'r a• I ..0.1...11. r04 a•r 14 a- D. , ,D 2, D W 2 iA D A,A ,A 0033'31 24'D 42 A ', W J3 0 a- ~! 1•1.••' ~ t r►+••'••• N 1.• .-•r r r I el , D • • - C 2 .a• UI Ut ►-4 r -4 N r N• N 1 U r r 4 -( , N N '3 01 LAI V1 N as A .4 UI r 0• J% N UI -1.r a' .D I =.2' =] (.r 01'D I .J 4144 r a• '-r(A CA•• 'D .0 4 r 3) (1'''Ui U ! J W r N:U v T a• 1 -4 J o i U1 o LA r • '• • • •• • • .• • • '• • • • • • '• • • • • • • I • • • • J..0 4 J 01 32 4, 4 4 0,O •- U O o i T'.0 Al a•.4 UI'1-3 U1 I a s a I o a .3 I r: V N 2 2 .0.r,..) N Ui (p CluJ Cl o as • 0.0•N 34'LI 'f '3 C) '3 Cl'3 I Voa I v ' !1 I ( I I • • • • • • 1 ' • • I • • 1 • • 1 i • • O r 22 O DDDsa • GCC'C �D ! 00 I 00 1_ 2 • D • D D 11 17 - 0 t 17 1 H H 1 is -4 02 inrn in 1'1 41 rrrr 2 2 2 2 D N ...-r •• -NNNN N mr1rsm rn rn • D a ! CO 0 l.- .0 i -4 2 2 2 A)A) 72!x: (n(() j 2 D ('1 • 2 r) •cccc C '0N INN 2 r 11 A)' V D • NNN(A CO "0a 17'17 • • 1 G) .n ! NN 0 44 .-1 C C D D >D • • •..-• ' • " 2 0 S 10 10 2 2 7 • 12 V'-0 2 2 l O 2 2 2 37 11 -1 r r GI G) G) V7 0 n in in'I'1 19 r1 i A A! l -- r1 .. ••4-1 m ri r'1 Pt r1 A) 73 At,o c c c c r rn 2 N 2 NN 22222 PlC) C c ,3 z r1 Cl 22 (7 r1n(7 C7sS I rti2 x VD i 1 'y 2 a r r AI .1 ! rl -4 Cl vl -I I rl 0 C) c v v -oc c c v c • a G1 61 C1 0 0 I v)- Cl ') -• .'1 n a 3) 3) rn rn ri A)ri 12 rt rn-r1 -i-• Cl v D rn -i 2 ..-+ i220 .2 2222 XS 22 02 111 n 2 �-22 2 • • • "G • rlIIrl1.1 rl in 0< • a.n 2 A .y .y •i • Al A) AI A) 0 A 0 ri -422 D i. 2. Q., gyp• D DDD rr D Ia 0 r 2 Z 2 2 CO r r r r -0 N r r r1 •, Cl :) 0 0 ri 11 101 0 n z Aa fl 1 Cl N COO ••O NNLi(n 00 a• X - rla P3 C .n a)1• r cCcrc CCCC 11 TI - 'O 0 c z aV a.141 rn 4.1 -0 917 2 • • Arg G 2 .-• r rn nri- rn • • • • rrrr NN • 2(N -13 r -• 2 2 V .V Pi Pi a.N 1 r1 -Ti rn • H ny 1,1 A A A 3) 1.•••i 2 a• rt 1'I rl Ih A)2) I • ! rn 0 (n 0 00 0 ZzZaZ 21 21 CA CA 44 I In 2 • , O 00 0 L4 21 21 • 44 "• 1 "i m rl ' N N I . 1 n 1- b a G UI 0 o U J O U C) Cl 0 0 O '•"Cl V O 1 14. r D A r 1.•-•M4 a• UI•. r a• 14 r Cl 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 i 1 1 1 I 1 Cl I a A a s A a a a a s • a a 1 a N 4 44 4 4 4 L.4 4 N N N N (w4 I 4 4 UIN C I 1VUi Ui .:1• LA Q.U' {r 0 G. N N N N r 1.• i . L4 a 1) •N 2 • I O r....- a• NN Nra 0000 Ln 4:: ()C 0,3 -i 1I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 4 a• ' Ui UI •.0 0` a (A.' O (A r r 1.4 1+a• i (A/A G G I. N rJ a• a• r N N r a, a• r CO 01 0) 40 r a• r N N I 0 PA r a 4, a• P.♦ N 1•. I+r. 1+r r r • I I 1 1 1 '1 1 1 1 1 I I I '1 •t 1 ; 1 1 1 1 l G r a a (0 04 a uI-• 43 (A....•.•a• a••' 44 Ifd N N r r NN 1-• 13 a• 1..003 A 4Or I •-•..... NN I. 2 • I C I G1 .0 • N ••• I • 4 • a a' r ' ! a c• V • C a CO CI G ti 13 • N 1 tT a O v • i . S m -o N D • ♦ • • • • • '• • N a i • •• •• •• • • • • D rn I •, • • • • • • (:) 1 , 1 1 • 1 I 1 I 1 1'i n - A n r•1 A r1 r1 n X, X I II • X x X X ' N: • N 1 N N N N N - N• N V . a j-.. N I _e..?Q 4 ( . 1 '• ,' ; a a - - V ♦ - •' .. J I - 4 ..-Vim' - -_- -' .. -�--' I • N NN • NN.'N N N N NNN • • 0' • 'V • V • 'V N N NIV NN NIJN • ;VN • •+ 'D LA LA I •• :if JI''Cll li) L1 UI UI UI UI • UI, • S • 31 • • 0 Ll N U1 UI :.11 U: ;.11 U1 UI • Jt UI' • n .J • :J. u LA! • • u LA,UI G G LI G u w • u' • G * W • G u G L..L. UI G L.u LA, • W u • I ' N N Ai! • r o+'.. . P. N r r-r • P • P. * r • P. r r.+ • .-•1. I') P. .l I_1 • CD 010 (D .D 0 D .0 .D • v. • J1 • !A • L..(a (A L/,W La u..• u'AI • )c,i • n 'll O 01 • r P41'+ r F..-r P.4. • L4 • .lI 1• .0 • > . `.4 •- •.) 'J L. .• .4 I • C'N• • 7C .7 'I.� I I 7 s I • i j • o I I 1 I I I O I • .2 ..• . .- ... tr.'u G Glu C I C C , c. I_. li ,: i_ :. .. : •J I 0 •I D .J ..i W 1 .0 W•.d .J .f).•O W 0I..) V)'. W ! .LI '.4) .O J],U .7 S .D .D `D I • VJ .P I • -4 Cl \ \\` \\i\ \\ \\\\ \' \ \ \.\ \ N.\ \ \\ \ \i \\, r I ▪ r r l .••• I...:. ..... P- r 1 r r r. ... ..r r r, t r r! D ✓ "LI'.I •'1 •:7:J J so u J.J,... -J 0 J --) :J ti 10 Cl .J 4J 'J .21 001 X 0 JD 10 1 D AIS y .'D 70 2 0 0 77 a 1 D • .D ! W.D .D (0 0 o J.,D D A I .ID m: 7 ✓ r r I P 1.••......'r r r•. r r r....e+ r.+r H r Ir r' r I �' I'1 • • • I a -i o • r C. IA - • ! - , z r - r' ' • a .0 r'r r • m s -I O Nr+ CO .0'NANNNG'N NANN .1 - rN. rG. J LA .0 r •-• D.D•"' N 7(031TUIU1.A:AL1 , r a)22 4:1'4) O rW.Oc..,ON r PO .OG .-.40v • o • • • 1 • • o :• • • • • • '• I • • • • • • I • • • • • • • • • • • • • '' d G'CI; O O.7 O .0 0 O O•7 u I D b P O G W N 1I,,1 G.+2 O -.a P G N 0 :30 1 IV.0 U I U1 0.3 l 0 .a 0 C] J .l - Ld r.)I C.1 ..7 u C.) r ..0(D C :•.CA P r.V .0G ..41 '3 -41 • - I • • * • • • • • t , ! I • r 2 00.0 DA7C)0Cl0 mI 11 I o�o00oO 00001 I LC' ! i I b, n f i rn a C C/G C.0 C C C C C C CC b AAi 0• PPa r PT P'0• AI Cl A I 2222',2 22221 rri J 2 _C rl , Q r � ar_ zzazzzzzl I .•.Prl - .4 0o sz'srssxas MI I I I NN,, • Cl az. n m z2zz'zzz> zzi 2 U)N 0 0�.0 N N y 0 U)V) • r i -• • .:1 0 C)C)Al C) 0 C1 .r IP 1 1 2 O » Dn > • y •D P11 -, 0 col 0y (no NN V)NV)I •>i O C Y S'. T. 2'2 ? 2 2 Z Z Z 01 ,1 A 1 • • I O • 00 0:7 7C 1 Cl 2 2 x x 2 x x 2 'S x l -o ;.1 LZ'. -4..4,-4 -4. .y4yy I n N 0000000000' nn' n D r)rl Dnn > n • » n 0 N CCLICE C CLCC00'. • • z rt In rl r rl rl rl C r)rl rli r r' Cl -•.M P M r r -I z • • • • • • • • • • r r n II. .7. ..... 0000000 A ! I nn, 7C • • 222222222 0 • j 7 A'. I N22 • ( P•.I-. Cl a-- 4/)•• -1 rl ••-4 N 0 0 0 0 C)Lit G) 0 n 0 '<1 n ;Z 000014100000. r r' • •-• D i rl. nn > DDDDDn A I 0 032m0rnrrlrnrl' corn -4 D AZ SFA AA AAAA D 1'1 .41 I CD > ZZZZZZZ; GAG) Cl C r rn CA ©W ®0 CD CO CD CO 'c 2 • O I w r r ri fn rl rn rn rl rl, Ion. s • r A • • • • • • • • • m '-• av r r A'z A A A A A 1 r r• - n• r n 1 • D n n a n n n i • 0 -•I r 000000000 > '11 -400!r... .. , -11 V) Cl "1 o rn r 1 C 300 I .- r1• N X Oc VI NN Cl)NyN NN 'o. N e- rrrccccCCC1 .+< A '7 rC '0 0.0 00000'0 O: r - n V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t1' CO I 2, '0.13 10 V 13 V '0: - 2o-e- r V VI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z: • -•7 '0'V 7 7 7 'O'V O rl n' '0 I) a r' D • • • D •• • D N: • • cCrrrrrr'r' Cl -+ • If 0rrrrrrrr Cl. A7 , 11 0 1 • a- Om - ••C7 n Cl el I.Cl In P1 x11 Cl 0 2Le)' I 1 S Iyto0 VI V1V)l Cl' Z • , A• • I y . I �Cl I I• • - 0.1' O .J C,' .7 C'v C)O4 •-/ C) o 00 ooi00 0n 0 CJ1 I 00I > ▪ rr• rr1.rrrrrr r • r • r rt.' el 1 1 1 . I 1 .1 1 ) .1 1 I ,I 1 ' I ''1 1 1 I III 1 I A I I 11 C') A • •• . .. . ..• • • .A O, to • ••• •I• •PI O ). NN• UGLU.GGGGGG G! Ni - N IN)NNNNNNNNNI to 4.01 C A NJ N - G, N N L.NNNN N N N NNj rr' i • . ' I Is1 1 1 1 1 G G G G I I r N I O IA LA Opo 0000 OI a.0 -4 LT' d0) 0000 • W LA GI • 0• • G• • 0}'• Wrrrr, A 0% I P. 2 A Nri r N Nr NJ N r CAW ,. •. Nal I N 1V IJ M N N r 6 P CO N 1 ; ON 0., 0 ▪ 0.0...! •j ' .• r rr•+rrm •Nrr+l rrI • I I 11 II 1 l 1 11 / 1 1 '1 I I I 1 1 , 1 1 11 1 1 , I I I f A • • -A 01'01 Nr a u u r r WI T • G• •T JO u r r P4.0 rri ►. A Nr' O..Ai•N*NNr CO 1W r r N NNrNNr1DamNI 0• ( T' 2 I ,I I • • o • ' 4. Is CO • LO 0 • 7 1 . 0 C. • • • 1 CO . s r 2 rl 7 • • • • • • • ► • • • Cl 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ri n • n n n n x ' x - I I 7C 7C 7C; x V) G V) i 1 LA , N u1 y, I I I r ' • s _� --N ? JI/ ', A 1 z '.1 sa N 0 f ) v• ] A I s �. ..� . N'N N Al • N N '• IN N N NN N I• r.) •' • N iUl U1 U1J • U) 1 UI • Ui UI U1 U UI '• ID •' J11 UI' • N '• N N N: • • N • .1• U(A U11 • U • (1 D CA.1.4 WG) • U W '♦ GU WrGW ;• W •, Uf W, • G �• GU GI • U :• - _ .D ' N N NJ NI • IN N * N N N N N ,• rJ *I N I N''. •• N '1• N N 4J' •• N •• I') r 0ID..3.DI • D • JJ ► !V .I -.1..I .4 ► (A • A' u, • N '• I+r0I • 4: • n WiU U(A • :A .I • ,.4 _. c...) .' I• b •I JI DI • ' W '• r r ri • D '• x n I I I I I I z V I J j< 1 1it I 0 .. C r. c.! ` �c..3 .3.0 O u '.4 C •� ....) .li 0I A '� •r..41 •O .D 1 •.O .O '.O ,D .Il'.D.D .J •0 .D I '3 i .O .J .G I W -4 y \'\\\I \ \ \\ \.\\ \ r r r.r i r .-• I \i \ ( \ IN.--N.- I In 2 I_..L i C' "-i r r r r D D In D O•� D .D.. ;•D D.D W 31 aJ D 1 D . .A D.131 a1 '7 t'1 ' I I I • 1 r. •• _c Ni NN I 9 A I , C • I 40 ii I I i' .. r r N ' IrTW r CrUN N 11413)D :A(.•IQ)Ur•r N N a a D ,D ' •Ni D o " • '.,s 1.0 U1 (1',131 a1 /•N, 1 NNV V iJ1 J1 31 iN r . r • '• o • • • • • • . .• . • • • I • • '• • • • • • . + .1 v+r.++I ITT ial Al , u1.J 0 U'O U N N N N LD 0/1 C.) O a.J O a; ' 4)3 .D f' 0 7 •a s O'O p 0 0 0 r r iJ r •, I i (AW VO VO �pn CI NN -i I I • •• •I • • • I• P. • • I • r-rr-r' r r .x x x x x c. I ...' -• 3x 2Z2 '1 r'1 In 71 r1' D • A A A A 37 71 c z' 2 i O rl I''1 ri I b ' r r r r, 1 y A A D A A 71 z -� '4.0 4.,) (n V1 V/ N '' >1 -11 2221 C .1...-•.-.I 33 y y (1)N)(1) • = 2 2 21 rn < Inrnrnrn o rn \ \ \ \ �, Z i s zzzl z In • 'O C 2 2 2 2 2 y • 2 1 -.I Z Vi y 01 1 Z ' 1_31 1' C r'irnrnrirn C D. 1 D I N yyy1 C O a D a' :) r < 1 < < 1 V A y i '9321. A 1 7110111r1m r'1 C. ini ' I'1 r1'.'1.1, r 2 A A 3) 37 7J A I'1 Vl I I 2 m rx1 rx'1; b n A31AV z 11 N. \ \ \ \ y: -1, r) rrr1 _ -ti 2 a; zxx — < 4 .., z rrr -4 ri 1 A A A A D A rn; A 2 2 2 2 2 r • p: Gl: 3 I «< 1 ("1 x C 11 2 2 2 2 2 C-. • a i 0 a ryc s r Cf c 0 C'I C.) a I 71 KGI 1 V -a• Ll - r1 ' A ,n 000 0 Cl r rr-rr Cl r1 c 0 ' < <rl, rn .-t 4'1 r"rn rn rl r 71 rn rn rn rn r1 0 -. -4 rn 11 0 0 -4 ZZZZ z z GICCQ) cl 2 I2 : 0 C rn mrnin r1r1 21 DAA AA m ri. r%1 . .. .2 A A A 2 A DD AD' D A rrrrr a • a A -j -). D 2 2 • C r r r r r r y y y y N r A D in rn 71 rl 71 rn .1 3) 2 r ...; 2 y yyyy y A 73AA73) y D' 0 V 22X. J. rl .C C C C C C i « < < C ')1 A -4 -4 .4 r A -0 3 3 "0 v v '- r .104...4v z o • • z z 3 1 3 3 - "17 n n rl n n - -4, < -( -. 3 rrrr r r 71 171 rt 71 71 r- • o, r1 0 91 0 • -4 • r..•.•.... y y In y rX 1II I':1'I I'S. I' I•I Il w 3) A 0 i• • 0 V1 y(/I V) (n V) y <1 2 r1 r•1 2 zl .~I -4 I 133A a Pi, (1I y (1 In 3' 11 9: 9 • ! U)I • I • • [l P.tJ C' rJ p ; P. r r r r N N N O O o 31 NI N o .� .J� 0 a `Oo T U r r r r' (.I G r 1 r, r 0 1 1 1 1 s • 1 i s i 1 I l I i 1 I r) a s a a. a o j a a a. a f a s A a O N N N N, N N W U W LW W N NW. UI N N N1 N C N N N NV N N r r I..•-•r 1 Iv t.• •. r U G(Al (.. • 2 ......C.0O o i V - 00000 o o .31' .D i N N01 c -4 1 1 1 , 1 , 1 • ( ( 1 1 1 I 1 ► 1 1 1 1 1 1 auI-•-, o• o' ' U)U1 .Dr r c' a' 1,J1i N 0'(A as I 0' 2 N•'•CO C' N • N a c r O.0. or ' N' ca N I N r NI N O I..,I.•a N' r r CO .I.•N r r r, D' P..N•- r •• 1 .1 1 1 I I 4 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 , As•c,.r r' o' 11 a s .Dr r T. ♦, a a 0.U 01 I 0` - N .0.0or1 N N r r or C' a% N' or, or N r N' N 1• • 2 t • N ' a 4 O ' V 1 • r 0 v • 1 0 a r lc 9 V) A • • • • ► • . • y CI • • • • • • • • A rn • • • • • ♦ • • 4l , 1 I 1 • 1 : 1 1 1 1 rn n n n A n nn n X X X x A x 1 R x Cd N y y 6') y . y y' a $111111111110111111111111117-7--- __ , 1 - —__ 7-7-7-7-_ _ y I S • • N I• N N IV IN • . N • •• N J • N • N IU N • P.) • r.)i • V• JI 1• UU J;UI • N VI a Ut Ui Ul UI • JI • UII • UI • n .0 • L• CO U(.41,(4 * ' (Al • U U! • Cr' a CM 4 4 * ;U • u, • • LA • = m u uuuu •; (Al • uu! • ...., • IA 46 LA . 'u • r•J, • N • I1 .- I • .n a A a •i• • u, • u u: • ri r P.r '• • C • .0 . n • ! • •D 1.• Q) C• C•"S • ; N I • ') • F • ...I D A • U • D • r • A ,1 I I '' I I 10c. :,1.� .r I c I� J na . a o..a � i o f o o *•0 v ,) .AAIA . .. ••• ,A I. . . . . 11 2 r r r.+Ir r •.r •- r n. Ir ' 7I \. V.\ \ .\ \ \ i\. I I\ .I •••• 0 JD O A A 13 ! .D I D D ID m y 'D ,• D .A 1 • .D I ' ,•' r r•+!r r r r r 1•+ r r it r I I.44 . Ti 19 • I ! i i X I . I I , 2 r.. I i;► D r r r r I C r -4•Z v I co A 0 �, u r7 { P • 0 A I.7 I CD:A Cr'D N I IP a I 3 I Q•O• I 4 IU I .Q U1 u• +) ID NIOU 4I4 V. 1/1 LA IT I • • • 'r • • i• I • • • • • I • • • • • • • • • I • • • • • '�'� V u r.Q.4 Y1 us N a N I u u J O 0•K..)T I U;O NUI -,1 V C• '• .a A N J• .O•. I ♦I J6 U0u .) ! O O O Ia a a Iu ! a V! r f+ N 70 23'L'3 31 r r 1 3 1 I I3x r I r' 0 0000 —I AI ..• � 3 IA • h i O .0 10 10 1!1 A A A XIIA • 1 t <I ' •• ' i7Zt n1 H 1 I 'O A '0 j� �i 33•' 2 ! IAD .� N1 CV 2 - a s n.n 2, a !• O N 0 IA z.' z O n • A A 32.3J III AAI a 2 2 2 p' a A .y 1 1 1 71i -•-1j A � � -4 A r N N H N •'•• •.•rI 0 I '3 3 r n r .4I ZZ: O OO ... _ '-' C •-• 1 -+1 I.1 N A n n A i 71 n 1 Vl' t 1A A X PI2, y .N IA A I z i 11 YH I I N 1 A O‘ , 0 P N0 a. N1 2 V) < < V a' m -• r c 3 r1 m n a r1 n r1 m a m c -• I 0 C a 2 2' x n a z I I -. a, v m m �..rr1 ., a< n o . . 2 ., _ A • 'O r A -• o r1 s 0 1 -4 PI • n 1 r r r 2 A -. I J o V 3 1 r n N . N n n z n C r"I a n 2 0, n CV a 7-7 75 8 n Pal (/) a .r AI (/) Z r• x m a z 2 'C n 11 zo•rC n 3 N 11 .A n, • a • -4 2 a Ii elm n n • • VI • 1 A'a 77 O 2 r 0 'A .0 a L IA • c 2N r) z Q/ A ' PI 1n .4 i'1 • d• A•"• •1 I T rt! -n .' i .- 2 r-. Aw2Vf N, • I • a A 'A 2 1 0 CI r1 !O c3 > 2 ^l •) r1 A • • i I 'CO I 0 I • r . .2 nac) 24 0 7 0 0 0 o MI ,'1 n • r r r r r! w r .+ .- 4-..+ r r I W n ,I 1 1 • 1 I 1 ! 1 I I 1 'I I I i 1 1 , 1 n • •A +;♦ A, • •! • A ♦ • I jA •, ..0 0 L.4 N N NN .O; U cd U u NN u .0 Cil C -w 1-• U U N IV N I .)i (A- .0 u 4 :UI N N r A(II c T a 0: o ' 0 N N r C.. a -`i ' I 1 1 1 !1 1 I 6 1 4 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 ' U U 0•A A 4; a-.-. Q. .+ 'A Col i r .0 r 2 C` rNNN r1 • • r N Nr UA t I. ✓ ( p- ••• p•I •.r' r r 1••N Y r .•- • 1 1 1 $ 11 5 1 f 1 4•U , U O• •IA % I •. .. C• •- a u I I ' 0 • r .- S •+N N N I r 1 • •' r FJ N r {HI I .-I J1 2 t • I u I Iu I .D I r • V I '4.1 -1 I a u a. 0• .0 N i 1) I • r o u • 1 (D a . 3 m v I N n r • i • ' • • • . • • • • rn 0 • (• • . • • • • • • n m • 1 • • • • • • • • • c; 1 • '1 - 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 rt 1 A , n. n n A n I n n n i N • I N N N N N N N 1 I � V) UI .4=,.. ',y .37.07.-174-. F-,i A 1, Z-3 .. I / A ., -_—. . a u:. a-A _ _ J.i.3 1 I_. __S 7-777.__ _ ., 3- u ___1 /01.111111.111116 . 4._' ( •I 1 Y7•A V 1 , ? U .. . . - O ) .t 1 > - 7 i 9 V -1 .i' 'j VI V .i.-7-777-7-77:7-7-:-..777-77777. i ] 1 • .1 .. 7 a D 7• ? J . 'a ,. -� • ' N !• IN •; N' NI 5. N • N • NN N NN N N.1N^J ANN • N • NI • N • UI ;• ICA •' U1I Ut • UI ,• N * 0 J1 U1 N AA to N I UI UI U1 1.11 U1 • 41 * U) * U) A U G '• 14 'I, u1 GI • G .• 4.4 • 4'u .a 4•G G G14 u C.4 w • w •' 4 • u Z a a �* '4 Ia •' a; A' * I a ,• • . 4a,., 44G 4 GiI44 W,4 CA • :.. ••• ta. • :a ri - I C'^ !• U 411,I •ra * G • 1.0 • J/ 07 .a a 12 Aa 7) 711 a a ' 'A ;* W •1 Ul, • UI • A I 0 I• 1,1 • v1 as • 9 • r • -11- -4riv -lrjrr -;.1-r '• r-• •' .a:. • a X n • 1 .4 I • It.. CI t,. I O �IGIC V J a7 O u rJ C C C-wl ( ( O 'U ` ;W .01a O )i7 J 3L t01 W a Jl'o 40 tJIJ7 0 u.1..0 0.O.0.0 'U t0 1 40 - co •.. 'V ••. \. I \ I\ \1\ \\,\ \\\ \ \.\\ ' \ \; \ ,q ~ . r y' r D . 1 a r 044 ~I I u 1" . .7 .. V O .7 .7 a JC \ I\ \i N,, \ \ \ \ \ \1\ \ •4 \ \\I\\ \ \I \ U a ( ,a 31, ,.0 a Iy AIA .0 A!W '7171 s a 0700 -0 77; a 0 •'• 'P. •+I ••! V I r r'r r r Ip•N....V*.*.•P. ••• •..1 •.. I'1 I I . t I I 1I I I 1 I I i I N Ni r••! I I t I J • • I • • I I I C 1 CAO: JUL GG I r) GP. r+ *7 A) NNI I -4 .a U1 If •••••I O V IC01 V U 0..4+r N r 0• d a,UI N r 7 u;o G to is 4 4 T :A (A N:A; CI•a1 ja a a)ISO ; a O ^.W Ata IV a .1 T Co d1,Ui to d:-1 UI U1 IUI UI i 1 ' • • • ' • • I • • I • • • • ' • • i• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • t• t4.,4 4, 4Gi 0c 71 10a OIC.. I a -•r-•- al•U1•a .0 d 'O O'AlN (3;o OC)I OO -i -I -.I dl a.71 I4 G O c) N O'G OD co la d 0 •) .1 N Ia 40 u b 1.1 CO! .) u II I I I 1 • ' • •' • • * • .a )/ 1,i m, 1 I 1 p a v 2242122212.22'22 = ( 1 = - o 7)I • I 3 • .A C,,L C C,C C Cr ,LC -+ n' I < I G7 ..• A r• O !70 07�7 7 07.7 07 CO CO m 9,c0 CO to • A , 70 I JO 0i • . ,'D < 1.1:m m PI f11 m P1,P1 m m IV rl n r•: -y < -•I rrrrrrr1rrrrr r�i b. i- m ! _ -+! V' r3. z rrrrrrr'rr-rrr z (A; I n A 2 111 n 01 1144. 74 ••• • j : 2 I 1 O I'I 7C 0. z 1 m y n ! I O z r- r A Cl x (I) a z i r'1 o 2 .) • C) I (.4 y H n ° • I 7 --. i• I < m z m { j i,' m i ! y m ' A ,.1 C) 0 o C) .-4 -4 -1 -4,4 -4 -41. ... .� I C) j , G a m PI r n m 4'm m m m m mI41 m m m m I m n r• -I r O m r r r r r r n z r r r r r r z 2 4 Cl r'1 c) m mmmmmmm'mmmmr•1 m ZX • n ° 0 n 2 = 2 2 2 2 S2 2 2 2 2 n z 1 a r n z r o 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o r m n C') 2 0 P• -4 Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 2 2 2 2 x - A N to d a y m m m m m m m.m m m mrrl 0 < 2 n C 0 0 0 C a :. p ' -o c-1' r ! ` z v ; -; -0 z .33 I I v m. v r C 2 • r I I r z i• a+ -4 n b •. A O A 1'I •N -I I I r'1 i.I I .r m y • 'y 1 N r I : f'7 2 I 0 Z• 7 '1 ! I I p CO ! I • 1 r „ L11' O' 0 'U 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 010 O O 0 O I o I O I I n n • 1 I I I I I I I I 1 ;I 1 111 1 1 II I I 1 1 1 fl• • a a' a• a 'a a',aa Aaaa'. . . .. a I a a - 0 r3 Jl N I N N CA,C.4 4.4 40 J(.1 G GIG 4 Co la G N 41 I N C - rJ r 1' a N $53-N N N.N 1N N"N N N N N N 0) G 2 as 0•. aO V V rd. 1,-.V 1-•I.,•• rrrr to N N ti I I I I I '1 1 1 1 1 '1 1 i1 1 1 1 1 1 I I J (Si r� N; VIa a G'G4Vr r•r•-r 4 4; 0" 2 I 4.4 NJ, V. N ..0.N•- c.**,••0):V N a N r I N r N 0 u I UI V'r P+V►•P.NIP.r rr r ►•• (a 1 r • I 1 1 ; 1 1 11 I ;I 1 1 1 $ 1 'I 11 1 I 1 1 a I I r a G , a ' ,C1 rt., a G G 4 VIP.V r r P• 4 G' . 0 4.4 3 N •- N. I N N N V GNrm,.1Uta Nr N V I . N 2 C • ' I !a 9 1 • ! X i G, 1 ;• V. R I Ca N I 4.3I '?1 1 • ! • r . • 1 0 a r I = I PI • I • • • • ! '• •; • y cl •• • • • • .• • 1 • • a m 4I a ' 1 / 1 '1 1 ! 1 m Z. A A n • A Ai A (d, VI! I 3 y 3 5 y N i as t, • ^I 1 III '...r J "., A J V U .I- •:• 4 J - J J , . J • 3I� 1 > J , ,) ) • •, 1 rr ] 'J• N - 'JI (V ? 'R• >t J N J J 1 •a U '! I ) J ,l .: .. N Y •! V .N •! '• ) v O N : V V�� i • I I I Ni)U N N 1Vi • N • IV rJ N'N N N • R) • N • IV'n.) • NI • N :• r •' N IUI UI CO Ul 1 • I UI I• NUI 0 QUI .J1 UI • • U1 • UI • UI'N * U) • 1.11 '• n .al • 4 it.* L. 44I • 4 ;• 440,440 • 4 • 0 • 4:4 • :d • 4 • = 'D o. • UI IUI U' N UI' • - UI '• U1 CA UI:(:1 U1 U1; • • U) ,• 0 • •'A • A I • a 1 r• • or le. •+r or • 1 ''I• 1 �7 i).) •I .) ♦ ) • :, • .n .O • D' • p • tl II� • UI ILO A A •1 • I 2 :• 4..1 L.1 111!UI UI U1 • 4 • •) • ut U) • r, • N • A el 1 ' I • + I I I +I T r:l_) • I.J I.:0I Co: 0 C..,Co ... J I Coo en V',.) .)I v T •LI IU 41 ‘111;.J.. .0 .A .O '.0',.c. .O •A' I •A '.A .A I.J .A I 4) -1 to \I\ \\\I \ \ \\,\ \ \, \ \ \I\ \ \ . r'. 2 ).,•'r • 04•+04+ w r r r lr r r• r 'r• r r r 1 r a _'1 ) J'J ] 1 u ..!/.-o Ic.. v, t_:i n i �.' r. ... .-; C! 7C • \I\ \\♦1 I \ •\\\I\ \ \I \ •\ \;\ \i \ ! V A,{a A a 7i 1 ,a 'a •A,0'A A V• .0 I IA 9 1A .0 .JD ' '9 I� rp+ ►+rri r rr+r�r.�I I ... r rr.. I rl ~ 1 r I • • I I I • • • I n I1I II I ►..r ; • C. ' r - ra i r r r '• A -1 ' UN!• '9 0-I NN Ntlrra . 0r 0J3 n' VN1• Si0►• •1 • • 00• 4')v)N ',JN '•0 .J yr1. 0 . r • • ,• • • • • • • • • • • I• • • , • • • • • • • • • • ' • 3 A;A N V) 'r D P co o N r 0 I. •4 i N N V Ji O IJ4 r) 0 0 J I 0N•.• 0•Pr.A0%J% 404.0i4 ••r1 'J.J AS r..) ocJO 00a 0; I! .• • , I * I I• •I • • I N N V) CA N! (n N N N'0 N N' N i N co xt, N m ! . VIb Z7. 21 2 2S21212' 2 S nf'! • ' I O.0 44< iI I 0. ( >• D a;D l• n n X. 0'0 a 2 A,A 0 0 J I 7C I 7S>< 7C,X 7C 7; 7t 7[ • _4 .4.H m m m l O I 0 0 00 0 0 O 0 'may t 1 < X/ 70 v ��i� a 9 n b I i ; 77 m • tn • itn m mmr'Immm m I� r,In O . m z -.r o00 m mmmlmmm m •I� �•I44 -111 z 0 00 AAA i 't-4 -'- O ' '9'V 0 C 0 < , rrrrrr' 2 -*1 • • (/)I m 13 O .7 0 D C C C'C C C o ►4 ! z! 77 n .4•'4 000 r 222 2 22 t A X/'70 D 2 22 r 9990799 m m mm A; • m n n r1 11 mmmm in • in r) a'. n • • .4 73A737373 .0 O 0 O V N 74 m 73.73 m• O z . -o 0o m _ a m I m t•1 Nm 1c A A 1 o N i I 1 N Ii j I - I1 . I A m an 0 0 0 V G7 9 m'GI GI GI OV..V Cl Cl .4 0 r'1 mmm z mr O.m mm m O 77 D • D • a -+ 0 2 2 Z Z .4 z O CZ 2 z • 2 N .... n 1 V m J-•1'1 r:m m 2 m 0••m m in m -1 2 2 2 9 A 71 A A .4 A• ' A 77 7J 77 D -• -4 -1 -4 • D D D D •4 D • la D a D0 .4.•4 D r• O r rrr z r2 rrr r m zz r r m 2 0 D 2; I 0 0 I I N D67 NNCo) VI►4 DN ON N 0 0 Cl •-•C CCC i• C2r,CCC' I J•4• • m 2 Z •O bV •9 '7 -42I13 '9 '0' 7 CC ^4 .4 9 '9 '0•9 77 • 17• •••I_ 17 10• V X1 9 m r'1 V • r rrr m r • rrr r I mm 2 H M N..., M N ••• H r 04 1.1.1 1.1 I'I 1'1 .'O 1'1 p In in m 1.1 I 73 A.s ' 'v m I I a U) NNN 0 NA NNNI rA I 00 2 70' O I m a I I I I 0 0 , I 1'1 I I I • • I • ' • I I I I I I I I 1 .7'.n UI N'7 : '7 .4 N 03100 0' 0 0 010 N I N j D I 4.4 r CO CO r' •. I r UI r lr r r' r 1• ! r r I N'I 4 I Cl ' 1 11 1 ' 1 11 • I I I I ' I 1 •1 1 •1 ' •• ... • a' A I a s •'a • •. 1 • . A A ! a, a O N N NNN 4 N N N N N NI N 4 441 I UII 1)1 C 4N N NN' UI I N44 N N N' I N N UI'UI u u 43 43 0 0 0 i r 0 r O 4.7 J C' I :J Co r r 'A I .A -1 I I 1 1 1 1 ; • 1 I 1 1 1 ,1 1 1 1 1 1 !I I1 i 44 VINr, N I ar •O.A. O" 0'• 4 ar ►" c.n 2 Nr rr O' N I 4 CD N N N NI N I N la a1 u • 0 r••• .A 4 r • .. ! Cr. •' i.A NJ a•, r i r - r r a I 0 I • , I I I I ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,1 1 1 • I I Old aarl N ara0• TT' I Q' (A j •1)'• rI A I ..• Nr rrai . N ( NOI N,NN N I N I N rI• i CO 1" N I • I 1 a 43 I CO ID . I 0 0 1 . I CD . a r 2 m V co D • • •• • • • • • • N Gl • • . •• •• •• • •• • • A m • • • • • • • • * al • . , 1 • I 1 1 1 • 1 1 m n: I n 0 n n n n nn 7•i I I 7C I 1 • N' ( N N I V1 N 0 0 N N r PaaJ io .� ' � ' Jpi4:: J. ) )uuu • � aa - > >-). J.-- :uv :1::,' N • - o . a:a.� .i+= A • • • • • • • • • • a a • • a a a • - A_--.--- - - tom- r ) •' J . i A . .. .) ) J D -. . , , _. , 0 a J A a ♦ , . ) 0J '4 , O) i i - J A ^I V ,• IN N N Na rJ N N MN N,4144 N N N •• I) • N N N N NI • N ha N N N 44.4)N N N N N N NJ N • NUIUl4N oucn N(.1 trilUl co co 0 $; 'I r NLA NUILAI • • N I U1N U) NU1U1 LA Ui'N N U) U)(., n D ' 4 '• .444 cA 44.4 444144 U-4 •i u • 444441 • 4 LA C4 (.+ u(....4(.4 4444414;A S 4) 'U) .• 0 N Ui 0 U1 Ui I N VA W (.'1'.Ul N 0 UI •' -.1 :11 1 LA U1 Ln, • r:1 t;1 u1 (.1 L'1 UI,u1 .41 ,.J)LP U1 L1'0 A 1 .-- • 'w e N N N IV rJ 4.014.1 N N N:14 N N N •! ) • N N N N N I • r r A N •e T „'1 a' T r TIT UI U1 U1 i C1 '41(,a.0 • n) • r - ♦...l U '7 i • .A -4 .4 -4 -4 -4,-.4 -4 ,....4 -4 -.1'-4 -4 )< A j I • i ; i • z -4 o T c �. s _J 4- :.1,-. 'n r7 (.41c4c)O o '-. a-(74 C)C) '3 I � .-) G1 c: '.11_') 4•)..) -:1 ., ) ,; s • st)-4. NJ •1 .0 h. N. 0INJ -.4a'.1•A -. NO N. i '0. 11 ,0 .L NI •A . NJ -.- - ,,0 .A ,, ... N, N;'. N V N \ - \ \\ \ \'\ \ \v•+ \N.\ \ r+ N.- \ \\I N. \ \ \\ \i\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ n Z . .... .• r.r4 JI.. -',+r :• A r r+.4.0 r•1 .3 -....-r+r!r r-r•►- .+r-.. n 'J '.IC ...1 J .J ('+ _J'. •J � L ..V •)I J ) .. 43 (.`14 . JJ1`. 0 b 4) A J n A _a i.A .A J7 0l 0 D 2 -A 41 A b r r rr r •.. ,.0 p 02 I A : CA 17 4) CA 010 0 G :A ;7 :A .A A) 1r+r. .. .• ' n I ! j ! rt • •• p • :�0-4 NI - 1 O -4) •.!TN4N101 NNN I i �a (,� yrMa • NUI' rN14 '.+ , -4 -1 , '0 r ANN (/1,1%) T Na U) 014) .0 O 4 r f.1 'CO r"1 N 4 ,• • i•' CT U1 .0 N N-4 r 4 r 4 V-4 T r.) • UI IJ' 4 4'A<A 44,-44 r N 0' 014 (.4.:-.:J V-4. .0 Cl)• 00000000 00000000 110 •• V 4I T T •L,� ,.:0 <.L.4 V 1-r'A 0'. (J'.p V N.40 :iI • 4 j UI • P ''U" 0C, UI I4 3 U1 41 U1 O') N N •1 N Cl J '7 t- ,-/ 0 ;N O O U) N o,.i 01 'b Ui 4 N .4 C) I 1t V d 4(J ha '4 V;4 0:00 •.7I63 Nu0 UJII 7 u...Jr t7O 'U,) rA J'1J 'r� �1 v Ny . i* e • • i• e • . 1 N NNNN V)CA N N N 0.0 N N N O. N V)N N N 1 V) N v)V)V)rn J.,4 Le)NN N(n•0 CA Z C C' 1 C C C C C C C C'( C C C I -41 -,1_,...y .(. 10 n.10 '0 13;17 13 '17 n D 17 11 ^ rt 1 -'11I'1n1'' 719075x4)9 71 n n:nan • • CCCCGC0CCCC'c rrrrrrr CCCCCCC .•I 72Al'p77771 nnnnn!nnnnnnt1C') o 77 p Aim A a F 2' 7C A 7( 7C x; • •tel 1 < i 9 = 002739M 07Daim 977= N. HNN Ny' Y I' m In CCCCCCC ssn:r• snJs 1i 2 In to(n N NNN(/) 22212 222 ! ... nnAnn! i 1 .4.4.-r ' .4 04 T_ r r r'1 A 1 • O Cl • 2222222 n m r•1:.-.) n n m r n 71 m rn n n l .-• .4 (1 m rn m m m m z z z'z 2 z Z • s z•10 s YI , Cn • r) r N V) N N N V1 N C) G1 :7'C) G 0 Cl 22222! I S V)0 N N N N N • • • • • • • I 2 n mI'tlnnnmln 7' 2227t 0 n 06100000 G1 Q1 G1 G1 C1: Cl) x CCCCCCC 4 x...4.4 .4 • m~ V 7 n O 0V 1) • G • • • • o • • r r, • v, -4• • m - I• z 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n m m m m n 0] MW,M C 07 4) A 4) m a m m a r'1 r+1 I'1 m n r'1 O T 11 44 T -t T T 222. 22z2r rrrr-r r mmrrrrrrrrrrr -4 44 TT -n-11 TT-11 G1C) 04") C) . 0 O 000001 0 r 227mm71m71 mmrn nm m O 4) 4) 4)4) 4) 4) 4) 0 '3104701011 0 ...,nnnnnnnnnn n • z 3, 0 0 n n 0 0 0 • • • • • • • • n i1 l''1 19 1'I m m • • • • • O 1 1727272.,27772,772727:172 O 11 V1NNN NNU) 2 132211i '• OO r'1 ()V) N N N N N m m m m m rn in s s Y Y Y 11 m • 1 ti n n (1'0 n n n n n n n V) '1 CCCCCCC 77 21 aamA m .r, i 0 x Sn... ....,.,.....,..,,-. ... ,., n r 13 "V V 12 "0 -0 "0 < i << 0< < z 222221 -4 mn -4111-4-1 -4--1 V- - -, 77 0 -0 -CI 13 13 'D '0 T H Al 1.4...<.1.. V! '-•.4 V-y.4 N 77 D • V- -< .. . . . .. . 4. rrrrrrr nnn0-•nn • • • • • 'mmrror 0 nn 9 m nnmmnnn A CA A ww ' i I 00 ! ' ..I (4) N N CA lA CA I r r' i0 • 70i � a�A .�! rr' i ! I z nI inn(1mmi • • . I • 9i v -oisvw1 I. i ! I I • • . . • • I • 1 • • r] -100M .-150,"" N UI N1N N N N I O! 00624201 O I 07 3, 0 0 /3:00 a.= O o'd O s r 4)•') 4 ON N N r. 1 i F. I n I to 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 j 1 1 1 1 lilt l 1 1 :1 1 0 • • • • • A • • O: • •'• • • • I . .. . . A • •40 • 4 A A O 11 NNNNNNN 4 4 (AAA 4 4 4 N N N N N N • 40 40 L.4 4,4 4 L.4 4 4 4 4 • C N T L. 4 4 4 4 4 N 4 4:V V V V U V V V V V 0 .- 0 0 0 0 0 0'O N N N N PJ N N r 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • I I I II I I i 00000.000000C-7 0 _ l _/ • '0 • A4 .•r.- NUIUl,Nr 0'0' O.. • u.+r r; u ,0 ') TT TIT • •4u4',-• r• Z 4 •'- Nara• ANN *0. '3.040,0 ,0 N N1".CO CO �I ,+ rr+N N N P.NJ NU)N.-0)C) 0 I r r N••r U1 r 40 N CO T T T T N- ..P. •N 1-•I L. V, 17 IJt N,......N.- • I 1 I 1 1 CO, 1 1 1 1 1 'l 11 ;t 1 • 400040+ Nr O' •u,Y'•Irl+l 4 '040 IIP TT'T• •444 r"•►' .4 1 ✓ I-N r r •4,N r r 1+4-, 40.0 40 N N r ry 0 ND •+ r 1-4NNN,.-N N U1 N 1.-to CO 2 1 c •` , 4 'a a n r ( T 'O I • • r 0 c' 1 m SI r 2 • CI 7 • 11 , 1 • n I 1 1 In n n an NI N N i 1 m ' • j 1 . I ! �ie---.---k_------_/ u(„: • a s s .7'r `Se's •a �a u saC u u u .•�u w`a H'i ~ -� �+ s II a Pi I& I - Ai a a di AI a a m a * di a ' (w '1 'a' Y Y 1,,,,' - J J' •J . 1 F7,77", V - i J 3 V I ,i _I • J ---•) i 3 _.+i .1 ] - V, )mo3_....,3_21...A .• J - , i ! . ." .J . I , 1 • • N IN * N • N N N •i IV • N N Iv • N • N • N 1• N • N • N F- N(14 I• UI • Li u)•s (II • ut LI U1 u1 • U) •• UI (n Cl .D Cd 4 ,• 4 • 4 • 4 4 u • 4 (4 U 4 4 • (4 • 4 • 4 • 4 A • 0 Q• * 0, •I '..t, • T .T 0. • TT. 5 UI U)U) • 7 • UI • .11 ► {,11 I I •-• l•UI , t • 4 5. P4)' • r r)• • ••.) •I .O .4) •O • UI • O • O • 4 C) 4 4 '• (T • O • T f T • : ,.> J • 4 4 4 • :'i1 (.5 • • N X .-) . 7 - 1 < 0 a.•) •O .J• L .J W ..)'.O U .11•C I .O j D •O 4. -I E.. \\ I N. \. \ \ \ \ \ \\\ .. N. \ \ rn 2 P.IF. 1 r r. 1.....w• F.F. F. r-. I-. P• la 0 > .J ) j 1 C. .J .. .:J... .:. r. . ~ .L \N. N. \: N.\ \ N. \ N. \N. j -. \ N. N. :J A ':O i ]u A D.D D•A D,D.D I 'A D D :D U 1...F. r I r{ rrr I,-.4.. I r F.F. r .-. ..• 1.. r1 In • ; • D I 0 r : `r r + !.r r 1.4 04 rr 1.•r • JI o I 1-`F. - _Ji 4 3 N N j V_V 0 T I ILI.UI UI N I r .0 .0 0 4 IJI 03 02 I N N I NO.O -I • 1.V V •'.3 rr1 ,O • OO I N r Ui 40303N I VAI 39 -4 v ..l] ,S.) N • • • I • • • • ` '• • • • j • • • 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • W .1 o I 1.•G j UI UI i it r r r N N 4 .4 0 N UI 1.11 UI 0 0 43.0 ,O O 4 1 • ..I UI UI I '7•i u ,JI IO A a a I 7i )2 C3 I U., -1.y 0 0 D 1 49..) .JU U1 I 11 • • I • I j• • ' • • ; • 1• •+ , • • • • N N I X ! L; I C C L O O CCC I -1 N I C) CA rIM M - > I DDS -a 72 • DDa i 7 Cl r 2 'D '0 14 rrr 1111 rrr I •. 2 D 0000 cicl rrr I I • 0 z 33 X 1 I MM19 7O 11 f9M V) M 3 O. < 11'II ii.. I Z Z Z . V•4 r D T)• Cl .�CI n f <C I -1 r 11 2 • • O C' 9 9 O O F.H F. ! 0 I N r1 C7 1 3 I '1 i D A D X X Z 2 2 1 C 4 I M O • 1 'A 2 0 0 7 r r 0 0 0 •+ I 2 p • I r (A V1 N D D • • 2 2 O )'1 C) • • • 2 2 Cl I r -i Cl X 0 0 "0 13 v I Cl -4 .+ II r r r 1. 11 72 12 N D Cl Cl • - cc • 000 j 0 D x =Tc Y 13 1313 • z r 0)O)m DDD 73 r1 r1 r' Z Z z Cl D A D rl I1 MC7 jM ' N . in • X 0O 0 CI 300 •-•< 1 26l r O rl O O r1(1 'fl f1 r r r 14 RI D O M • -4 I Z -4 - -4 Z Z TI Z 0 0 0 D 2 fl -I 2 2 C) I I M PI i1 • M 0 0 0 <• I O M • M . 14 r1 r1 Z 14 14 14 (A V)N M .•• A 4 A • 3 D D D m D. • • r 2 Z D O r r G r P • D pi'T1 r - N 13 13 Cl C a• G• M.• 3 C 14 11 • A z v) (4(/) .-• V) N )[ Z -4 11 V) 0 1 73 Cl O Cl C C v C in v) -• 13-i r C i TI C 11 11 3 '013 • 13 41.3 ! M• 73N '9 • f .• • • r V V '9 .T7 14 0 i 2 11 V Cl r r ' 70 r CCC) A a Z r N Cl N V .•r. M .. Cl Cl -.4 I ((1 -y' 4M I CT rn r1 1'l 11 Z rn -• -•C A D r1 X I 14 7D J V)v) -I N' • 0 070 M r to 44 C Z D •T7:O(1 r M M V) • I A I C) n - NV), • I M M M i to 03y -• .j a J.. CO .]O I '.-3<-0 C'• ,o Cl C. I Ni C o D .-r r r r r r 0...i!!! rrr r I 4, r r 0 • 1 1 1O 1 I I I I 1 1 I '$ I I I 1 I I ,1 Cl 0 0 O O' 0 0 0 O ♦ O o o �', o O• O J• N N 4 N (JI/.11 U) i 4 N 4 NN 4 I 4 I 4 4 C N N 4 0) N• O Cl P 4.A D N N rr. r 1-. G C-)0 4 O' 32m oN . NN0 N I N UI UI -I I I • 1 I 1 l 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I 0O 1 4 a O. TQ• ! 1-.r- ♦ ao 4. O' I N N J No r r' N r r- UIa NNN I •r Nr r r' 1 rrr- I 1.•••• rrr r I UI' r • r I I 1 l I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 0) o I or I O� 1 0. 01 0 r r O a o I 4 .5 I N 4 , N O I r r, N r l•• IN ♦ NNN I ►- ..- : N N < • j I . • 1 4i j I != U 41 . I I 1 .O I-: . 7 I • r • I O C) I I • I , 0 s r I fn - • . N D ► • • • • • •' • • • N Cl I •' • • • • • * • a M • • • • • ' • • • • • 0 '1 I . I 1 1 I I I J I Cl fl A, A i Ar) A A 1 Cl Cl . ' >< X i X 7C I 7t7C X 71 7C • 4N IA N i NI rn N N' N. ' N I 1 - ♦ 7 •u - t . i.i „ _ J _'ov �voc r;' 5. a.aJ :1 u : '� ,iuJo ). , i va '�-Jvui;'; ' Rv ' y . ajw - _ • r _ __- - ..._, . _Y ' : • Y ; .. 1j, = j ;• 4 V . 4 . A . JJ J , J U - `1,V , ' fi ' y VY P ) V O .A a •1 J r ) V• O J ► u N - ..0 S) ......... I . I ! I I • ' I I N j • N •)N I N' N I I V. N I 'V N: N i N I N N V; N; N i N• • 1 r J1 I • JI U1 UV co 1 M I co, JI, Lo UI'1 N N N i. I to li: LAI Ul: JI, • A s0 • UI • u u u. ,Ai w1 u u w' u' a u' u. u •" ' S 7) •D • I .D A A, tDI 701 Ib, AI 3). IDI AI AI A. IDI -a' y' lYI COI • In r' • r rr, r' r! r, r1 ) .), it •.:I «I r1' cJl i, C.,' • n VI • N ♦ J•I ri•1 NI r• u! .t1' DI VI •TI J1i •I rd N1 r '') ' 1 • A LI 1 I I I 0• I I I ! I ( ( • 1 • I � 1. n .7I 'DI r:. ,�I a1 0 01 n v J c_' ,7 u! c.I n .0' J I0.2i V' , •DI ./11 •Di •:1 A 41, W� W IO A, .D1 W 'D! -4 I... I,.. rr r• rI .�, r .r. a.I ►.: r' rr N. r rI..-.)G1 J! .�I ..:, 173OI J OJ J); p •13): 701b. • r0 I o -D D I 73 1m, A i I1 a0Ir. r r rl rri �' r .+ r, •+j ►• •'+ rr• I l i l ; � i I I f .• I I I I 1 I t o W1 ! I I I I ! C 1 • • I 11 1 I I 2 1 .0. n'1... 1 u4AI 4w w wI • • 0.•4.• .1 .II rr1 r r I 1.•1.1. - I 'D .• 0 �'D •4 J rI NNI a.Ai 1••Ir rrI 111 UI •'.7..7 I - -a .-•44• s-•t•• NN rr1 ./ .1i 'D Ull uI NN :AAaI UI In, CD 0D1 A.' ' •-•1-• • •: 0%Us rr• 0% IT 'A s1 a0 J0I j,VI • •' O..) ' • 1 I• • • • • • • • i • • • • • • 1 • • • • • • • • ' • • • • • • • • • • 'D, 'U1 ui r°uI J•u I A 4 .1 .1 UI UI • •1 rD,D 'D rD o ' n ur r u o N N w CA O O JI 'a' s •J CO N 42 ' :31 .1.4 I.au uu .D D1 ON LT. rr Ola aC7I UI UI Oa UI 411 T 0)I 47 °I • • r • • • • • 1 r ♦ I • ♦ ♦ • •' • I • • I I I I f Ii ' I I i I I 2' • '3 tLi s' Z 2. 2 rn m ml m Ai cl -)I OI 2! si I 2 r • ..�I s! Ir' m- s r r' z' r OI 2 0' Ir 70. al rrI A" c' A, :DI rn m' rn x r • D. 2' XI - , C1 <. r r r 01 1.11 91 Al n n 701 m1 z 'O, f'1: /I, 6N r. r .a.-4! m 21 y r•i -1 -ti o I 72 1 t -i I 70'. 2 I I• • c ✓ .. m s•i UII 17 pI • 1 n• 73I 1♦ \I I 1 f' - m r LA 2 21 : 4 -r .. C: -r - I f'1 I 2 i 11 m' mt a 2' n AI 71; m ®I N AI 0, 0, O I 't 7C C-: 2 ►•I m l H I 7i r Al m I o• C. I O 1 z rn 1, o z1 -+ m YV ' •1• 70: r' z 01 rI -4 A v. C 'V 9 '1 \ rn, r ' I 2I a . 0I AH , Cr) I n C O (1 to' S ,^1• ' C ai p A 01 0! 01 • ' • ' • 2 A N J O, N C, in 2. r e A zI 4.4i 'CI - m -1 I .2 2' n. A" w . ..., r1, rI I .a 2 1 0 n s• 2 2 2: n. s• n' NI 7I OI lot 17' 7C n r1, s 74 mnI N1 2' -41 r' •a'. I'• n C. 1 N' N 14 A P. a: m• m1 m • . m !) • �; I • i • H I ii I 7 O c, AO m r 73 m ('1 (4' 01 'Am 0 01 m i 0 1 ' • -• -. mm .4 0 m m 0 0 >• 01! O' 0i .a• m• O' 1, -4 I z '11 11 I C 0 "11 C C. "I; 2i 0" C; I Z! C 2 m • In (" C C m -. 7, C .. .. m` r1' 7R' 14. m in - m, 2 70 a 70 -0i r 2 -a OI 1' 701 N; la' A A. v .A, v Io I .-, 17 w I r! w' v r 17 m Y A N ai A 2. rn N i 2• N • 2' A Z, x N '0 V In a 1:7 i A C a DI C Ni 1, >' 0 N II o. n A -I S A 'i r < A r .aI Z7; C' i•' h.' 71. C Hi 71' A I O • m© • 2' -. n Z• 2!. 17' 12 2. 2 • . v 2: • , 1-r < 77 v -4• n 2. -•• -(• r' 11 V' -4. v' -1, v 1 f 0 ,1 • m a • • .•i r! 1 i • ' Ni r! • , N' ti 1 ;'n 11 N A I m l ►•1 r' m 1 nal m •-I ,h :a A w, 0' P w1 N; ISI mI a• AI I-I 01 DI O W4 C m' � NI "II t' N I •4I 2 -. -4. AI I A' A: I Ni A r'I AI "'I 0. tin • n m' mi m; I I I ml n' ml n m rn v; o ti I -,aI rn -o1 ml 5/5 , rn, • : • • , • Cl)I • I (Al 1 1 i • I i C1 .., V Cl til. 01 0, 0 1•' 0 I 7 1 •✓I Q 1 O I r..1 0 J I O I • > s r• r r' Co •••. r' w •- .-I r, r! r: r r! r1 rI rI n 1 1 I I ' I . 1 1 I • I 1 Il 1 ' Ii I . 1 I I I I 1 1 P) 0 a wl •' • •1 •1 •" • •I •I •I •I m U1 41 U1 -1 LN N, w' VI N, N NI w1 N w1 N. N1 CA is ✓ r u 4,1, '••• w, r' •' u' Cl'.:I NI NI .OI VI r' NI u. rl Q I ' VI 0I" N 0, 0' 01 01 01 •1 0l •I 0 U11 i7, of CAI -4 I I 1 I I 1 ' 1 • 1 , I 1 I ' I , 1 I I 1 1I rI i , 1 I U1 tel 00, Nal, 1 a ' 1 I 1 CR r ' 01I NI 2 :..1 0 v' r• rara • N' I w, UII Nw • w I CAr ' r N NI r 0' rI NI l . 0 4/. r 001 101 Irl UII w' r, or rI 1 r r, r1 rI v• I I 111 I : II I 1 I , I . 11 Tr 1 Si 5 I ' 5 I1 I • • u o.31 •, 0'1 N' 0 LAI w1 u •I ul O• r N, "Q' all • ^' 1• a 0 . r . ..a' ••• , 4 r 1I 0 : N NI • N 1•I N • NI r z . r• , r N N N N • • . , a•l O I I A AI Uli IO • 001 •r, I 1 • u' mI • ul LA1 aI -o 1 Ii • O r • 2 g • I • e to 0• • n m • , • :7 ' 1 N I I i I 1 I 1 N m ro JV4 • A . I - _ Nmo �.-.•.--O V J Ou N 7 Y V V 1 -. -Z.�.'J ]-54 1 4 .. 4 1 1 1 :. . 4 ' F • i >N -. 4'l4747:-� ' J Y1 yy )Yy! t V- V• 1 , o•)'I•. • u N-O O ,-- .... �1 4--1—..--. ... Y f s ia a a a y f • N O J. 7 . a a r V - J A A U , J O 7 , u1 , •♦ 'J i v ) - - �_ ' � J .---\- -- • _ 7• 3 . a + • y, N ••• I• ) ? • ♦ i I 1 :• N • N. N, NNI Ni NI N: • 1 NN' NI N'. N I * JI • CA (A rn: N i JI 0: UI • cn UI VI I .n• fl 0 • 4 • u W. W' (Al W. 4I W: • C.•(A 41 r..' '• to • ...0p a; CO, : 21 X • ro ,a• COI p t i• N • N N' N NI N NI N. • r .- .• r n V s I• 4/ •: ! s• o' u; NI ...I ..0 D JC r) II 7 -* 1 1 i O < ! 'U -( C..1 u I C.! a u. k. ,3 I 0 1 :1, A W 4) 43 SQ 4 WJ; .0 47 .0 .a I 42 )I -1 41 \ \. N. N. \ N. N. \. \ \, N. \ ri S n 4. .4 o .f o. a .-i s.7 . .., \ \. Ni \ \ \i �I \; N. \ \ \. X 41 A. .aI .1t a a, 2 2I , A a I a 33 12 I P. p•' r' p. ••• r r .• r r' 1-• 11 iI I I I rl • 1 • i ! i >. 7-0I I , 4 N In. a I 4 I ., C A '.11; P01'4) -• .y I ! 1 -•s C • • • I • • • • • I • • 2 I(( N M '3 UI I4 • N rA' V N ••rI 44 • • 44 rr r.-' N 0 0. 1 .O U7; 1 • • la N N A r1;1•0 Ol a 4 011 LA CA 4 W( O a I.t+I .1 V UUN N ,Oc D J I. . CO 7 1. I ,+• •• . { I a • t 0 'O N UI I O o a C. - II• • .• • • • • • f. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 • • • • • I N J►;oJ31JI.0 '=1 UIr„l.1•0 UICn a.'LI PP. 00 o0 US US ..I. C)u 10 L.) oo IJf .I! cJ 0,ac)• '4 (U.J0101 0..7 22 44 u0 00 U1(A NN 00 10'-a 0I C3C3V v� •a U I Vl rn I A !• t o 1 s 2 t 2 • .4 a, 11 O O 0 Z' O. 2 11 a,< 1y z 1 'C O 1111 1/ 11 'It 11"*1 111 11 r I • . Z I I -'1 c • . CCCCCCCCC r I M CA So • Zi 1-•i • • n ZZZZIZZZZZZ, rl is, r T V) 1I Al < r 000vl000000 < 01 r . .. , V) y1 rll rr r PI C' aD P1 n C I rl r•1 1 I r 2 7•'D .•UI iN N N N r•7 r1 r: S I R 9 i I CO -1 I a s 11 I r.7 O 4.•.+CO 107 LA G N U1•'• 2 I a in, 1'1 3 1 1'1 717 4I 0 0. -e O in A' 2 1•i 1 I 2 H 7C C C i a.4 1 1I.4-1-4 40 1'1 1I 70 p a 30 .• .,! rf I p • -4 Cl n 0 0 0 010 0 0 0 0 0, • C 0 l r i 4 2 ' N.i C 2 .•1-1 1-1 1 1 1 1 11 -P m 1 rt ._. f7 n A r1 rrr-rrrrrrr1 o • 'I �' Z -I1' n Inc • Z' I I n I I n, 1 I j r'1 11 ..J • 0 I N N. I 2 rl • 1 CI 0 M . I I I • 7o m • c-) z o• , OI A` 7oi y: orn 0: ' z• .r 2 a. a •. 1 1 P1• PI 1 (71 I C r1 C 0 -4 Cl 12. -y = _' 'I. 111 I, PI S rf• A P1 .• • rn Vi C C o, v1 0 H o a • -• 73 A O I Z o O s 0i 2 O r' 40 r' fT n 0 In r >.I - 2 1 1 c, y• o ,n 07 1 (Al A Ai o1 CA1 0 N• 2 VI 39 0' \I O 01 A• 1..11 B•' Cd•I0 r1 171 ' 2' tel' i A9 CCc�'I CI I w! 1 p S. -•' • i • I 91 Pt n1 Nr,1 y, • ►. Cl n C1 i I �' A I O' n 0• 01 • rl A • Ul'i N' 0i 2: I 2 2' p, . .y • • Nr1: n! P1: m » -Si ... H • p i A I • I I y • �' Z • <I 4 • 1 I rl CI I o I 0, MI a 1 I 2 C2 I I I 0N 0. NI 0 0. .t ul 0 0: O1 U1" A I - I U• Ul! rI 2 011 1.: ✓ rI r rI ►.I 2 , Cl • •I • a I 1 I I I a I 1 I • ( 1 1 1 i 1 n . a I •' •I • • 4: 41 a 1 .• a a' A 0 W Uli 41 ^ 4 V N U' U W WI r C r •... v: r 4: 4I •0• .0 sCI .O, C N , 0 1 .-, 0 1 UI r, 01 C. ,•O i ►'� • - I ( 1 I 1 1 1 / 1 a I 1 1 1 I • I 1 I i Ul r1 rI NI CA oI O W I r.►. r U I I .D CO ., CO 1 • i r-• 0 1 O r♦ Y r l U1 1 a O I a •' • .01 10 o I of • .•I,.. r.1 u • I I : I 1 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 1 I as •.•1 r a a o1 O 41 P. r1 a .-. 1 I mi Oa r r o1 o 04 ..•AP UI r. 2 , I • i ST o : I • I i I S.0 • - 1 ' I I i I I • r , . 1 • I i ,I o o I , a 1 a 1.. • I , C D 1 N A • • • •• o • • • a r1 I • •• ' I •I • • C'1 I a 1 1 r • j • a f x i I iI r , ti y i I I y I r -1 J • '�N:3 7 1 Y• .. •.J 4 4 13 .. ) .4 1 flt, • 4 ♦ A i • i • •J 'J Y u•I ,,,..1.N '4 1-1..'1'',± .<.A-Y N 4 N 1 > , v. l •t > J N-o U1 0 0 0 0 0 O O Co 03 0 w Co c n 0 0 V V N H 0 0 U) Co H 1-' H H h-• H H H H H H H (1) H H H H N 01 • H H CO • • • . . . . '0 A A A A U1 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A R 0 W W W W CO HI--• cD (0 (0 co co 01 Co W A A 01 A H CO • C7 H (0 (D H H H C1 U1 N (A OD N N H (0 H H F- 1-' (0 CO 01 C*7 W 0 0 Cn U1 Cn N N -- (A) ' H 0 H co 0 (n N H A co 0 0 - H (b y C11 H H' H H H 61 A co cD Cn (0 co U1 H H (0 co H H C3) W H H 01 Ul N.) N V N.) H H H H 1—' H 0 N C1 H H (D CO H H I 9 CO F-' H A W H H H H H H H H 01 H H H H Gn H H H '17 n O .p H H I-' H H O) A (D (0 CY, CO co A 1-' H (0 CO H H 0) W GQ H U1 01 V V V N H H H H H H t--' N 01 H H (o (0 H H CD H H U1 0 0 O O O O O co co 0 co co Cn 0 0 V V N H 0 0 co 1-' H H H H H H H HH H H • • • • • • • H H • H • Cl • H • • • n H H H H HH HI-, H H H H H H H H HH H H H H .'T) 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 9 0 0 0 C) O C) O C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 n C) H co co 01 0) N 01 V co N 01 W H W (11 H CO 01 C1 (A) 0 V H 01 C) 1--` A 0 H 01 Cn (0 -1 co 0) co C3) 0) 01 co Cl u'1 cc) co A co 0 0 (0 0 0 H U1 H H N H H CO 0 (0 (0 (0 (n Co W C) N O) 0 0 V 0 0 0 Cn A CO O C) 01 0 H A V O , C) 0 of co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (o 01 u, O O Cn 0 (0 V 01 0 0 Co V N 0 0 C 0 CD U) 0 c 'o ') Cn x x x co 0 x o o 9 Cn 0 y o 0 C) R LTJ po A) CD CD 0 C) R CD C 0 A) CO ' _ _ ? (D x <' H a a 0' 0' Cn '-i A) A) H x 0 0 CD B tD p1 CD H H 0 (D CD 1 a '7 0) • R° 0 0 11 '0 0 u) Cl R R° 0 1..5 F-S (D a ''-5 H H = HH H < C CT) m H. t-' � LTJ U) U) '0 0 H H-' H •11 CD tri Cn '17 CD cr 0 ' CO r• _ _ 7d trI CCD R4 Re 0 to X H 1-3 CUn R° 0 C-) C Cn a I 0' CD H) (D 0' 11) CD H) A) CD Cl CD 'TI • CD 0 0 Cl H 0 H•N 0 coC •-3 H co co 0 0 0 cn a 0 0 U) 0 c) • 0 Cl H) Hh CD C) H. QQ Cl Hb CD C) 0' Cl Cl) CD • • :: . 0 = 0( CD U) • p10 H. • < lv ,-s 0 H. '0 H. 1"1 (JQ C 0 C) Go 0 CD CD (D U) U) U) U) 0 x H x ''17 H C) H O CO C) X tN7 U) H ' 0 0 H Z tr1 CA 0 U) 0 cD Hp'' a z1 B C a `t a R H U) .1 a = Cot H• H < Cl) H. 7C C) z • Z B Cl)• H• /1 0 X' < a H rn L--' Cl) cop A) cD 0 Cl) m d H. 0 ) 0) '-n R 0 R 0 R tri 0 R a7 CD o ¢ n C, ~ t- 1-+F r RB c CD C 0' • O u) > CD a i x H 1 x X = cr r) 1 CD rt 11 Cn CO U) CD C) 0 0 C) 0 C CD H) n p1 0 < < 0 R (< :3 H' U) s) 0 H) 0 H) X' X H CD Cl) NCD cci b a 0 o 0 00 a` D '0 CD r x o H R CD a CA CD CD a H-Cl) - . 0 C) A Co • H' 01 Cl N C1 C1 N U1 (t) H Cn V W 01 U1 W 0 (D Cn W H A x 0 H 01 H A co 0) 01 01 (0 0') (n W N Co 0 0 (0 0 H U1 01 N (0 0 (o (o (o 01 CO CO 01 O 0 0 V 0 0 0 co 0 01 0 H A V 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 Cn 0 (D V Cn 0 0 W co 0 0 0 0 co (p (o CO OD CO CO OD CO CO CO CO CO Co CO Co W OD x N N N N co (o (p (0 (D (0 (D CO (D a (0 (0 CO (D (0 CO V V V H H H H H H H 0 C) O 0 0 'O 0 0 (0 Co V C) Cn A Ca.) N H 0 (o 03 1 V OD (l A (..) 0 • cn C co CD b C (T1 • ay H H G) - COvcncn ) H0 H op a HHoocoNUl (Ji 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ''d u) oo con x c A) cD n7 I0 I0 c a n ''i N to Y I c H CD o 'I .r, 1 O H H H ct ¢) < N H T7 S 3 H H � 'CS fN 'T7 G co :d �taoo s✓ o • y cn (D (D a a 0 ct m N H 0 0 • ct � Cf) Cf) co O) H G.) 0 N O O CO H 4 0 • O) �ACr1CDU1N CO 0 H W (D (DW001CA) 0 W U1NOCDC0 (D iv co 01 O Cn O) O O) W • > O -JH000OH Z '-.7 (00000H p x t7 :c1 r=1 m CD 0 ct cp 0 rri CD o z � d 0 H %v O O H. C) CO O) H W 0 0 • N O x 0 H (D C) N W H 0 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Joel Hunzinker, Holmes Street DATE: September 11, 1981 Background I have reviewed the attached memo from Linda Willemssen with the City Engineer. He said the facts are essentially correct, and that the repairs to Joel Hunzinker's sewer cap are the responsibility of the contractor who has not received final pay— ment for the job. In addition, the City Engineer said the contractor tried to replace the cap once but had the wrong size. Alternative for Repair 1. Withhold final payment to the contractor, Barbarosa & Sons, until he repairs the cap. 2. Authorize a plumber to repair the cap and charge it to the contractor (deduct it from his final payment) . Alternative for Assessment Collection A. Charge Joel Hunzinker interest on his unpaid assessment. B. Do not charge Joel Hunzinker interest and charge any interest lost between September 10, 1981 and the date the cap is fixed to the contractor. • Recommendation I recommend alternative 1 and B. Alternative B requires action by Council. Action Requested 1. Abate accrued interest on Joel Hunzinker's assessment for the Holmes Street improvement for parcel # 27-001-748-0 if the assessment is paid within three days after the repair of his sewer cap by Barbarosa & Sons and deduct any lost interest from the final payment to the contractor. 2. Direct Barbarosa & Sons to make the necessary repair and to inform the City Engineer when the repair has been made. JKA/cu MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Linda J. Willemssen, Sr. Acct'g. Clerk RE: Assessment for 80-3 Holmes San.Sewer against Parcel 41 27-001-748-0 DATE: September 10, 1981 Joel Hunzinker of 701 Holmes St. called me today to inform me that he will not pay his assessment ($225.00) until Engineering has repaired the damage they did to the sewer cap in his basement. He said he has had 5 or 6 discussions with Bo, and/or other engineering personnel, and each time he has been told that someone would come and replace sewer cap. To date they have not done that. Today (9/10/81) is the last day to pay this assessment without interest. He wants to pay off his assessment in full so it won't go on his taxes, but feels that he has the right to withhold payment until damages are repaired and also that he should not have to pay any interest as City personnel has had ample time to repair the damage. If this information is correct I will need authority from Council to accept his payment without interest. (They will have to waive the interest against this assessment.) This should be taken care of as soon as possible and most certainly before October 10th certification to the County. Please advise as to what you want me to do. cc: Bo Spurrier, City Engineer °rciviAto CITY OF SHAKOPEE i1, TJ y 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 MEMO TO: John And_Prs_n_n - �dmm i bra t or FROM: Jim Karkdnen - Publir Works Dept. SUBJECT:Park Depl- _ - Capital Rnagr t DATE: Aug. 27 , 1981 INTRODUCTION: The Park Dept. has recently demonstrated and videotaped several used front mounted rotary mowers for use on the boulevards and parks which would require a machine with maneuverability without sacrificing production. , Currently we have been using a 48" Simplicity mower which is regarded as clumsy, non-productive and in need of an overhaul. Anticipating this need, we had placed $3600 in' the 5 year capital equipment budget sometime ago, to replace this unit with a similar type mower. However, after observing the increased efficiency and production of the front mounted type mowers , such as the Hustler 295 mower which we purchased last fall, we began to search for another mower of this type which would fill our needs and fit into our budget plans to replace the Simplicity mower. ALTERNATIVES : We have reviewed the following mowers : ALT. #1. 1981 Toro Groundsmaster Model 52. $3600 (Toro Company) This machine has been used only as a demonstrator by the Toro sales personnel. The unit has a 52" mowing deck, has less than 100 running hours, and is delivered with a full warranty for one year covering all parts, service and labor. The new price of this mower was $5410 . The Toro people had placed the demonstration price at $3995, however,1after some negotiating, they reduced the price to accomodate our budgets ,This machine performed remakably well during its ' demonstration. ALT. # 2 . 1973 Excel Hustler Model 275 w/cab. $2500. (Bryan Corp. ) This machine was extremly maneuverable like our Hustler 295 which we purchased last fall. It was a trade- in to the Toro Company and will C require mechanical repairs shortly. The mower deck had some vibrations which indicates that the spindle bearings are going bad. The Toro Co. has two of these identical Hustler machines and indicated that we could take our pick for $2500, or take both of the machines for $3500 . It is our feeling that these machines are too old for our usage. No warranty was offered. ALT. # 3 . 1981 Excel Hustler Model 261. $4700 (Bryan Equip. ) This machine was very impressive in the demonstration. However, the Bryan Equip. Co . could not meet our $3600 budget figure. He offered to take a trade-in, but we didn' t have any piece of equipment that he was interested in. The 16 h.p. Briggs & Stratton engine used on this model has a history of breaking down, but the factory has been replacing any bad engines on warranty. ALT. # 4 . 1974 Bobcat 48" mower. $2500. (Power Quip Co. ) This machine wasn' t very maneuverable, and we had carburetor trouble during the demonstration. The mower deck was considered very light. ALT. # 5. 1981 Howard Turf Blazer Model 727 . $ 9000. (Kromer Co. ) This machine was a heavy duty, diesel powered, mower but was completely out of our price range. Some considerations should be made toward using diesel engines in the future, because they are durable, relatively tune up free, economical and very quiet. ALT. # 6 . 1976 Howard Turf Blazer Model 60 . $3000. (Kromer Co. ) While this machine was fairly maneuverable, it required very slow speeds while pivoting around objects , because the operator was seated at the extreme rear of the machine. If a sharp trimming maneuver was executed at too high of a speed, centrifugal force had a tendency to throw the operator out of the seat. This was dangerous because both hands are always required to operate this unit because the hydrostatic control lever is hand operated. (Most machines use a foot operated pedal to control the transmission speed. ) The offer on this machine was $3000 , however, if a 90 day warranty was expected, the price would be $ 3350. 00. Q o- RECOMMENDATION: We recommend purchasing Alternate # 1, The Toro Groundsmaster Model 52, for $ 3600. 00. This obviously was our best buy because it is considered a new machine, (100 hours) and has a one year warranty, including parts, service and labor . The new price of this machine last spring, was $ 5410 . This machine is not intended to replace our two C140 International- Harvestor rotary mowers which do the heavy duty mowing in our parks which have rough terrain, or foreign objects laying on the ground, such as rocks, twigs, or branches. These two mowers are scheduled for replacement in 1984 . /() � MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxiand, Finance Director RE: Abatement of Assessment DATE: September 8, 1981 Introduction: The assessment for 80-3 Sanitary Sewer Service Lines, Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Holmes Street Reconstruction on parcel 27-001-630-0 is being protested. Background: An assessment search was completed in July, 1980, on the above parcel quoting pendings on 80-3 Holmes Street Storm Sewer. The title company called for the payoff on 80-3 Holmes Street Storm Sewer in October, 1980, and paid that amount but at that time was unaware of additional pending assessments for the second part of the Holmes project. An updated search had not been requested and from their standpoint was not needed. Therefore, they had a pending on 80-3 Storm and paid that pending per City information and nothing was said about 80-3 Sanitary until summer of 1981. Recommendation: Recommend the assessment on parcel 27-001-630-0 in the amount of $704.98 for 80-3 Sanitary Sewer Service Lines, etc. be abated pursuant my memo dated 8/12/81 as approved by Council 8/18/81. GV/ljw /0c_ MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: End of Probation — Don Steger DATE: September 10, 1981 Introduction Don Steger will have completed his six month probationary period on September 23, 1981. Background Don has worked hard, conscientiously and effectively represented the City in the capacity of City Planner. He has demonstrated good staff capabilities in serving the Planning Commission and I believe they are well pleased with his work. I believe he is a good City employee and will continue to improve his knowledge of the City and thus be more valuable to the City of Shakopee. Pursuant to the letter of employment no six month salary adjustment is required or recommended. Action Requested Approve the completion of the probationary period for Don Steger and authorize full time permanent employee status. JKA/jms EMPLOYEE PAYROLL AUTHORIZATION Ci , D SALARY CHANGE STATUS CHANGE\<I NEW HIRE SOCIAL SECURITY # NAME 30tir- c 7-�C9 ( PHONE ADDRESS ZIP CODE BIRTH DATE AGE DEPARTMENT POSITION DATE OF EMPLOYMENT FULL OR PART TIME PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY ge4/8-� =747-- SALARY DATA: HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUALLY EFFECTIVE DATE REMARKS : - b7//j 10,67T- /(71/Y /) d0 APPROVED v / / f Cit Ad ' istrator Department Head w _! ....aft m o ee r gnature 7(c/ ) Date Payroll Form No. 1 MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Linda J. Willemssen, Sr. Acct'g. Clerk RE: End Six month probationary period-Don Steger DATE: September 3, 1981 This is to notify you that Don Steger will be completing his six month probationary period on 9/23/81 (employment date is 3/23/81) . MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: George Muenchow DATE: September 14, 1981 The 32 ' x 24' storage building purchased from Mr. Larry Heinen of 9840 Bennett Place, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, has been moved to its new location at the Shakopee Junior High School site to be used for Park purposes . We need to now pay Mr. Heinen $2,000.00, the agreed upon purchase price. Please expedite ! It is to come from the Park Reserve Fund. GFM/jms i :. F A' CITY OF SHAKOPEE .. ii\9y - INCORPORATED 1870 i 6;•' 129 E. First Ave. - Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445-3650 44-E t f September 15 , 1981 Mayor Walt Harbeck and Members of Shakopee City Council Dear Colleagues: This letter is formal notice of my resignation as a member of the Shakopee City Council effective December 31 , 1981 . I have found that because of business and personal reasons I will not be able to give the job as councilman the time this very important job deserves . I want you, my colleagues for the past six years , to know that I have enjoyed working with all of you. Having served on special project committees for the City during the 1960' s , serving on the Planning Commission, also as Chairman of the Shakopee Housing Authority and the City Council during the 1970 ' s until now, completes 16 years of service to the community of which I am very proud. Shakcpee has come a long way since then and the best is yet to come . The future of Shakopee is in good hands , the hands of its people . Thank you again for giving me the opportunity to serve . Sincerely, 0.4.1.1,2L-)1,04‘k Richard Hullander The Heart of Progress Valley An Equal Opportunity Employer