HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/18/1981 ti
MEMO TO: Mayor and City' Council
` QOM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Non-agenda Informational Items
DATE: August 13 , 1981
1 . Notice of Ad Hoc Downtown Committee meeting August 20, 1981 .
The purpose of this meeting is to obtain a better idea of
what can be done, the steps involved and potential funding
tools . This is not yet the soliciation of a specific consult-
ing firm, and it should be a very informative meeting.
2 . LeRoy is on vacation this week and will be attending school
next week. Howard Staska is doing our inspections and
Jeanette and Patty Schulz (summer CETA employee) will cover
the desk. Phyllis and LeRoy will stop in after hours the
second week when Pat is covering the desk and Jeanette is
on vacation. The new Building/Assessing secretary starts
August 24, 1981 .
3 . I held a meeting on August 7 , 1981 with all non-union employees
to "clear the air" regarding the City ' s hiring policy as it
related to the hiring of the new Building/Assessing secretary.
The meeting went well and we covered other areas of concern
that I will review with you after the budget is completed and
we have time to discuss them.
4. Jeanne Andre has received notice from Met Council that the
have recommended Shakopee ' s JEJ Park Grant (LAWCON Grant) for
$42 ,500. We ' ll let you know when we get final approval .
5 . The Fire Department and Renaissance Festival have finalized
the agreement Council approved for fire service for 1981 .
The Department should be receiving $3705 for their services
for the year.
6 . The Hockey Association, Contractor and City have now executed
the release for the law suit . The amendment to the Lease Agreement
and release are on the August 18, 1981 agenda for Council action.
7 . Attached is the monthly Assessor ' s report for the period
ending July 31 , 1981 .
8. Attached is the monthly Building Inspector ' s report for the
period ending July 31 , 1981 .
9 . Attached is a thank you letter from the Association of Metro-
politan Municipalities .
10. Attached is Jack Coller ' s quarterly report for the second
quarter of 1981 .
,
Non-agenda Informational Items
August 13 , 1981
Page Two
11 . The City has been releasing developer' s agreements administra-
tively when all improvements are in place and paid for. We
have blanket releases for whole subdivisions when the developer
does all the work, and partial releases for individual lots in
subdivisions that include City 429 projects with assessments .
The release form was prepared by the Asst . City Attorney and
the process is covered by the attached administrative policy.
We come to Council when the developer has asked to replace the
developer' s agreement with a letter of understanding (letter of
credit) for remaining improvements that need to be installed
eg. sidewalk for Gary Laurent. Call me if you have questions .
12 . Attached for your information is a Bond Consultants Newsletter.
Please take note of the (v7) paragragh. Recent bond issue sales
are covered on the back.
13 . The J.E .J. park shelter is up and being referbished by the
Neighborhood Committee. The playground equipment has just
arrived and will be installed soon . The Committee is doing
an excellent job so far.
14. The power line discussed in the attached notice does not go
through Shakopee .
15 . Attached is a letter from Tom Hagedorn regarding Revenue
Sharing.
16. Attached are the minutes of the August 11 , 1981 Ad Hoc Cable
Communications Committee meeting.
17 . Attached are the minutes of the July 28, and August 4 and 11 ,
1981 , Eastside Park Steering Committee meetings .
18. Attached are the minutes of the July 8, 1981 Industrial
Commercial Committee meeting.
19 . Attached are the minutes of the July 8, and July 13 , 1981
SPUC meetings .
20. Attached is a memo from the City Administrator regarding
Labor Negotiations with Local #320 (Public Works employees)
to be discussed at the end of the Council meeting. The
purpose of the discussion will be to establish parameters
for labor negotiations .
21 . Attached is a memo regarding the Main Street Sanitary Sewer
change order.
22 . Attached is the monthly Financial Report for the period ending
July 31 , 1981 .
23 . Attached is a memo from Jeanne Andre regarding Videotape on
Community Programming.
Non-agenda Informational Items
August 13, 1981
Page Three
24. Attached is a memo from Don Steger regarding action by the
Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment and Appeals on
Variances and Conditional Use Permits .
25 . Attached is a memo from Gregg Voxland regarding sewer billing.
26 . Attached is a memo from Jim Karkanen regarding weed control .
JKA/jms
I/
AGENDA
Ad Hoc Downtown Committee
City Hall Council Chambers
August 20, 1981
7:00 A.M.
1. Call to Order at 7:00 A.M.
2. Approval of July 9, 1981 meeting minutes.
3. Presentations by Consultants:
a) 7:00 A.M. - Westwood Planning and Engineering Company
(Richard Krier) ;
b) 7:45 A.M. - Barton-Aschnan Associates, Inc. (Barry Warner
and Dave Perisho) ;
c ) 8:30 A.M. - Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. (Glen VanWormer)
4. Conference on Downtown Improvements.
5. Solicitation of Applicants for Kay Kenson's Replacement.
6. Miscellaneous
7. Adjournment.
Don Steger
City Planner
:1 H __
Q.) CJ •
>. .) Cr)
o
o C CO
N
J
(._
0
C) •-4 • >,
.4-.) C
al
U) fa 0 C v ,;
Q. +) C
E p a • c C+
�O a) • 0 >, u -u. N
>, '0 �> r.
H �� Ca a u
C C' •,-' C: L U ')
4- > G^ C C x J
:1 j, . ,
J +.. N 0 L c Ett
V <
5 C) 07 x L Ci ,..
JCO
C .� 7 U coco >, C H L V J
C) L •. N V N 4•
.r.4 C - II C ^ O. L > I
>-. > U > C.+ - tC -+ G ..,
0 Vt
H •,--4-_) L. �- J 2 > -Vi L .K.(l1 H (4-4C Q
3 ., CO .. •r >, 0
r'
N (� U 00 . N L V -.
4Zr. u x -
r!
0 x <u0 �O O E-.
. ? u �G V c
1V) C.
I C r c_
7.
'`' o ( H V O C G V >, L
C. - EL, 0 0 G 0. N
`�v--- G .� C) n
J --- .. CO c .0 E
< G. ..
- JH-1 . .- > _L 0 0
L
L -
:z.1-1 . S C
V V C) in : V
c N
O 0 < 0 10 7 Cr G CO a -• it
-' X H .L O.L.) ...1 ` .r R E
X U) H (.1 C. 0 OC N c0 C
0ca Cd 01.
.1 >. V lit E 0-. X C) u
N Cy.i* ...ev Z G
4-) • Q -.-+ 'JJ• CC • i.+ 2 L y
t) 0 V u .0 0 +)
C.� c7 _ -
. 0. , C
U) U)
E U) .1-) 4 .0 t j 'H) ..-CC) E E
j j
co > .L C . C.'
0 0 6. L u
,- H U .0 O .., 0 >-- 0 t» x
X) -4-) E-1 U) 0 ✓ -., a1, C 0 v c 'O u
v 0 -4 O u r, c:
J^ i s , 10 L -� L L C 2 ¢ Z .. C
S L C0 0. .. OC C) td G
0 N a N = y - v, c:
u a C c 2 c u '
2 :C 0 C.
a) t0 L 4) CJ ?0 ouC
L. E v; .., e 0 z C0 L L c.
1. • H _ L.
2 • a y C E - C). 00 >
L
u C n II <..
J) • ^ C. L. > 0 -+ C
it
- — 0 u -7 .. l0 0 C
'a J E L 7 C of a&i .,
44"I7 > V L > C
Cia
D I .0 EE C) 00 .+ N C) 4) O.
7 L ••+ v .o 1.� Ci Vi
1. L. t.:-, N• F +.-• C 0 U. ..
O �0 Cr) u J �" u 3 14/ c
- 9 O 0
Ce
C
(L • II v u N a.,
O 0) - a V Y co ... < 4)
..--1 — L .r 11 •4) •.1
,..a * 2 H GG 4) u
4-)
at n C oo ..4
CD y a u Z >, L, C ' -`+ V ca. w
a• U) n HH >, UGC. < to v '444
i x a < U
U U) C E-, .--4 N
CO C O H '-
G
H C.) cti -- ti r; c In VD N
S.. Q Zc CC C CO
O O C
\ 3 C .0
•r--).O to N C p a., .7. O•
CO N z • o z
£ '--; H
Trnuuy snoauE T T a:)s T W
3
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT JULY, 1981
PERMITS ISSUED July Yr. to Date Total Previous Year
5397 - 5420 Number Number V:1luation Number Valuation
MO . YTD.
Single Fam.-Sewered 2 20 1 , 177 , 600 5 11 631 ,000
Single Fam. -Septic 3 5 407,000 1 1 70,000
Multiple Dwellings 0 10 1 , 104,000 1 8 2, 485 , 938
(Mo .Units) (YTD Units) (0) ( 28) ( 2) ( 16)
Dwelling Additions 7 19 115, 125 1 14 72, 500
Other - - - 0 1 12,000
Business District 1* 3* 240,000 1 5 1 , 659, 500
Agricultural - 1 132 ,000 - 1 13,000
Industrial -Sewered 1 2 1 , 185 ,000 4 15 20,034, 500
Industrial -Septic 2 3 792,000 3 4 166,000
Accessory/Garages 6 26 144, 350 0 13 59 , 600
Signs & Fences 0 7 15,050 1 12 25, 983
Fireplaces/Wood Stove 0 3 6, 400 - - -
Grading/Foundation 0 2 • 59 ,000 - - -
Remodeling (Res. ) 0 18 73,330 8 30 53, 370
Remodeling ( Inst . ) 0 2 5,300 1 3 154, 500
Remodeling (Other) 2 26 1 ,074,000 4 27 437,300
TOTAL TAXABLE 24 146 6, 524, 855 28 141 25 , 875 , 191
TOTAL INSTITUTICNAL 0 2 5 , 300 1 3 154, 500
GRAND TOTAL 24 148 6, 530, 155 29 114 26,029, 691
MO. YTD. MO . YTD .
Variances 1 3 3 6
Conditional Use 4 10 - 9
Re-Zoning 0 1 2 8
Moving ' 2 3 - 1
Electric Permits 13 99 12 74
Pimbg. & Htg. Permits 20 113 18 82
Razing Permits
Residential - - - 1
Commercial - - - -
Total dwelling units in City after completion of al ] construction permitted
to date 3 , 486 * Circus tent - no valuation
Jeanette Shaner
Bldg. Dept. Secretary
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IN JULY, 1981
5397 Eric Graf lv 8 4� 45H,o zon i
Drve Geodesic Dome $ 75 ,000
crr
5398 Dave Brotzler 133 West 1st Aa ir
p 3,000
5399 Dennis Welter 815 West 4th Avenue Garage 7, 250
5400 Harold Bindewald 535 West 3rd Avenue Garage 5,000
5401 J . I . Case Company 6340 T. Hwy 101 Office Bldgs. 980,000
5402 Jack Trimbo 1064 South Swift Porch 3,000
5403 Carson & Barnes Mn Valley Mall Circus
5404 John Schmitt 1015 South Main Porch 4,000
5405 Howe Inc . 7632 Hwy 101 Storage Bldg. 180,000
5406 Rich Logeais ?, 10v 6Sh t � HouGe 53,000
5407 J . Allen Link, Inc . 10 1 East Viieircle Ho se 40,000
06e3 &.Pet)/ ae-w' i,�t
5408 Thomas Datwyler 1149 Quincy Patio 2 ,475
5409 Robert Bohnsack 953 Fuller Storage Bldg. 2, 940
5410 Howe Inc . 7632 Hway 101 Mfg. /Storage 187,000
5411 Citizens State Bank 1100 East 4th Ave. Office Suites 30,000
5412 Duane Krautkremer , 1¢41 Hillside Drive House 105,000
2 '3 ' 8.fer& / // I de) die
5413 Michael Sullivan 2055 Hilldale Drive Deck 500
5414 Elsie Lebens 537 East 1st Avenue Porch 1 ,000
5415 Carl Anderson 836 Lewis Street Porch 700
5416 John Radermacher 140 West 3rd Avenue Relocate Garage 500
5417 Ray Siebenaler 119 West 4th Avenue Porch 2 , 500
5418 Linda Muh] enhardt 8100 Martindale D ive House 57 ,000
"Thana42)//5- 4'Q,ye' a a id.. Pad-r°- .,eco az,/
5419 John McGovern Rt 1 , Box 100 Storage Bldg. 4, 960
5420 David Theis 919 West 5th Avenue Garage 4, 200
TOTAL 1 , 749,025
1
association of
metropolitan RECEIVED
BOARD OF DIRECTORS municipalities
President AUG 5 1981
James J. Krautkremer
Brooklyn Park CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Vice President
Mary Anderson
Golden Valley
August 4, 1981
Past President
Richard Asleson
Apple Valley
Ronald Backes Mr. John K. Anderson
St. Louis Park City Manager
William Barnhart 129 East First Ave.
Minneapolis Shakopee, MN 55379
Greg Blees Dear John:
St. Paul
BeaBlomquist This is to acknowledge receipt of Shakopee' s dues to the
Eagan Association of Metropolitan Municipalities for the fiscal
year 1981-1982.
Jerry D u lgar
Anoka I want to express our appreciation for your continuing
Laura Fraser support of the Association. Please convey our thanks to
Lake Elmo Mayor Harbeck and the members of your city council .
Jan Haugen Again our thanks, and please do not hesitate to contact
Shorewood us whenever we can be of assistance.
Jack Irving
Crystal Best regards,
De
d
le Schneider
Fr n- _
Fridley
James Senden Vern Peterson
New Brighton Executive Director
Jacqueline Slater VP/cr
Bloomington
Thomas Spies
Bloomington
Robert Thistle
Coon Rapids
William Wilson
St. Paul
Executive Director
Vern Peterson
300 hanover bldg., 480 cedar street, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 222-2861
JULIUS A.GOLLER, II
JULIUS A.COLLER ATTORNEY AT LAW 612-445-1244
1859-1940
E 1 1 WEST FIRST AVENUE
SIIAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
553Z9
August 5, 1981
Members of the Shakopee City Council
Mr. John Anderson, City Administrator
Mrs. Judith Cox, City Clerk
Dear Associates:
This report covers work done through my office for April, May and June,
1981. No attempt has been made to account for numberous telephone calls and
miscellaneous correspondence.
During the three months in question 25 court cases have been disposed of and
8 jury cases. As I pointed out before, before any of these cases reach trial,
arrest reports must be reviewed by me and formal complaint dictated, signed
and filed and then a pre-trial held, all of which is quite time consuming.
During the three months in question the City vs Dunker and Muhlenhardt Eminent
Domain Proceedings has been terminated. The proceedings involving Hauer and Ueland
and Lindstrand, Grayson and Topic are nearing completion as is the extensive
proceedings involving CertainTeed and others.
As reported on Mayl8th, Registration of Title to the real estate on which the
library is located has been instituted, but is now being held up for the purpose
of having a survey as required by the special Examiner of Titles and also because
we are corresponding with the Milwaukee Railroad exploring the possibility of
purchasing the Milwaukee right-of-way which crosses all of the north portion of
the library property, so there is no progress here at present. The Milwaukee
Railroad has submitted a figure for the sale of the property and this is now
being considered by Council.
The suit that was instituted against James Hauer and the bonding company growing
out of the building moved into Shakopee in violation of a permit has been
disposed of and the building has been removed.
During this time several city plats have been checked and the abstracts examined
in connection with the filing of these plats. Several ordinances have been
drafted as well as resolutions and some written opinions submitted to staff
members.At the request of the codifier I have checked over some materials
submitted by him and I have communicated with him.
Very fru our s�
Awz
Juli.s A. Coller, II
City Attorney
JAC/nh ('
//
AMI_NISTRATIVE POLICY
AUGUST 12 , 1981
City staff is authorized to release a developers agreement
when the developer has asked the City to install
the improvements , a contract has been let , assessments
have been adopted by the Council after a public hearing
and have been subsequently paid , provided there are
no other provisions in the developers agreement that have
not been met . ie : payment of park dedication, limited access
onto r-o-w, limited sanitary sewer flow, etc .
, //Is,
,i"City Aa inis6ator
i
EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
FINANCIAL SPECIALISTS
RST NATIONAL-S00 LINE CONCOURSE 507 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 339-8291 (AREA CODE 612)
File: Financial Consultants: Ehlers and Associates
August 1 , 1981 Please distribute to governing body members.
Well , it was another false start: May into June brought a solid improvement
in bond prices (lower interest rates) which petered out, and, on renewed
volume, interest rates headed up again. The interest rate increase is
remarkable in that precious metals and commodity prices declined sharply. Tax
exempt rates may have been kept up by the proposition to exempt from federal
taxes the yields on special certificates of savings and loan associations.
* Tax-Exempt Bonds
*
12001V JONES MUNICIPALS
It is remarkable how financial writers /I
i
still describe a real rate of return as the ,0 WEEKIYAVERAGEOETWENIY
difference between the nominal return less :°_YEAR6G«Gs
inflation and (quoting) , "Ifyour return is 9 LAST WEEK ,,.92%
PREY WEEK 11.7799
15% and inflation is 12% your real rate of 8 1""" " '"'I'"" "`I"�I°rt
return is 3% which is thought to be the "' '"II �'°
historical real price for the use of WALL STREET JOURNAL
money." Monday, July 13, 1981
But, if your tax rate is 40% (state and federal ) the real rate of return (on a
taxable investment) is negative 3%. ( .15 X .60 -.12 = -.03.)
* * * * *
,7/Special property taxes for storm sewers and separation projects may be the
answer to court rulings that special assessments require proof of increases in
property value. We have researched, originated and implemented special taxing
districts which overcome this serious difficulty. In some situations taxes
versus special assessments present an important financial advantage to local
taxpayers. It' s worth a look-see.
By the way, for any proposal that might involve a property tax increase you
should look at our computer capability to reduce the increase to net costs for
various taxpayers. This is especially important in Minnesota with its
"circuit breaker" property tax relief.
* * * * *
It was a pleasure to see all of you at the convention. It' s often difficult
to visit as much as we'd like, but just to be near is important. That's why
we think our contributions to the hospitality events are important. See you
next time.
Warmest personal regards,
EHLER . Ni ASAC IC • ' S
' ..e t L. Ehler
1
w / {'
SUMMARY OF AREA BOND SALES
Net Dow
Municipality Date Type of Bonds Amount Maturity Rate Jones Rating
MINNESOTA
Northfield, Minnesota 5/18/81 G.O. Sanitary Sewer 685M 1984-98 10.09% 11.82% A
Northfield, Minnesota 5/18/81 G.O. Grant Ant. 740M 1983 8.41% 11.82% A41110
I.S.D. No. 625 (St. Paul), MN 5/19/81 G.O. Aid Ant.Cert. in. 7,000M 1981 8.70% 11.82% NR
Clay County, Minnesota 5/19/81 G.O. Watershed Imp. 605M 1983-97 9.78% 11.82% A
I.S.D. #91 (Barnum), Minnesota 5/20/81 G.O. School Bldg. 1,810M 1984-99 10.99% 11.82% Baa
Norman County, Minnesota 5/21/81 G.O. Watershed Imp. 245M 1983-92 9.3270% 11.82% A
Rockford, Minnesota 5/26/81 Sewage Treatment Plant 115M 1984-92 9.56% 11.73% Baa
Rockford, Minnesota 5/26/81 Grant Anticipation 295M 1983 9.56% 11.73% Baa
Pelican Rapids, Minnesota 5/26/81 G.O. Improvement 410M 1983-97 10.29% 11.73% Baa-1
Rush City, Minnesota 5/26/81 G.O. Tax Increment 175M 1984-97 10.304% 11.73% Baa
Cambridge, Minnesota 5/27/81 G.O. Tax Increment 480M 1984-91 9.1987% 11.73% A
Cambridge, Minnesota 5/27/81 G.O. Temp. Imp. 470M 1984 9.1987% 11.73% A
Woodbury, Minnesota 5/27/81 General Obligation 4,435M 1982-91 9.86% 11.73% Baa-1
Mahtomedi, Minnesota 5/27/81 G.O. Improvement 370M 1983-94 9.93% 11.73% Baa-1
I.S.D. #271 (Bloomington), MN 6/1/81 Tax Anticipation Cert.
of Indebtedness 3,000M 1982 9.00% 11.63% NR
I.S.D. #11 (Anoka-Hennepin), MN 6/2/81 G.O. State Aid Cert. 8,000M 1981 10.0757% 11.63% NR
Olmsted County, Minnesota 6/2/81 G.O. County Bldg. 765M 1983-90 8.58% 11.63% Aa
Redwood Falls, Minnesota 6/2/81 G.O. Tax Increment 210M 1984-93 9.1862% 11.63% A
Wadena County, Minnesota 6/2/81 G.O. State Aid Road 635M 1982-87 8.77% 11.63% A
Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota 6/3/81 G.O. Temp. Imp. 2,315M 1984 9.14% 11.63% A
Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota 6/3/81 G.O. Temp. Imp. 1,835M 1982-84 9.17% 11.63% A
Bloomington, Minnesota 6/8/81 Permanent Imp.
Revolving Funds 4,000M 1982-91 8.5982% 11.54% Aa
Red Lake County, Minnesota 6/8/81 G.O. State-Aid Road 780M 1982-88 9.09% 11.54% A
Cannon Falls, Minnesota 6/8/81 G.O. Municipal Public
Safety Building 600M 1984-98 10.03% 11.54% A
Elk River, Minnesota 6/9/81 G.O. improvement 1,065M 1984-94 10.23% 11.54% Baa-1
Kasson, Minnesota 6/9/81 Grant Anticipation 1,420M 1984 8.90% 11.54% Baa-1
I.S.D. #833 (South Washington Cty.) 6/9/81 G.O. Aid Ant. Cert. 535M 1981 9.74% 11.54% NR
Maple Plain, Minnesota 6/9/81 G.O. Improvement 325M 1983-92 9.32% 11.54% A
I.S.D. #831 (Forest Lake), MN 6/15/81 G.O. Tax Ant. Cert. 1,910M 1982 8.84% 11.59% NR
Harmony, Minnesota 6/15/81 G.O. Improvement 1,280M 1983-97 10.06% 11.59% A
Grand Rapids, Minnesota 6/16/81 G.O. Industrial Waste
Treatment Facility 1,250M 1982-2001 10.2376% 11.59% A
I.S.D. #423 (Hutchinson), Minnesota 6/16/81 G.O. School Bldg. 1,325M 1983-90 8.98% 11.59% A
Marshall, Minnesota 6/17/81 General Obligation 565M 1982-90 9.29% 11.59% Baa-1
Buffalo, Minnesota 6/18/81 G.O. Water Revenue 1,375M 1984-96 10.0063% 11.59% A
Duluth, Minnesota 6/18/81 General Obligation 2,915M 1983-93 9.336598% 11.59% A-1
Echo, Minnesota 6/19/81 Loan Anticipation Notes 180M 1982 8.988% 11.59% NR
Hutchinson. Minnesota 6/20/81 Parking Improvement 1,250M 1983-92 10.07% 11.69% A
Hutchinson, Minnesota 6/20/81 G.O. Fire Hall 730M 1982-92 10.07% 11.69% A
Hutchinson, Minnesota 6/20/81 Improvement 1,370M 1982-92 10.07% 11.69% A
Bemidji, Minnesota 6/22/81 G.O. Improvement 1,215M 1983-97 10.22 11.69% A110
Granite Falls, Minnesota 6/22/81 G.O. Improvement 275M 1983-90 9.4553% 11.69% A
Faribault, Minnesota 6/23/81 General Obligation 2,785M 1983-2002 10.1248% 11.69% A-1
Crow Wing County, Minnesota 6/24/81 G.O. State-Aid Road 1,000M 1982-85 8.88% 11.69% A
Lakeville, Minnesota 6/29/81 G.O. Improvement 1,175M 1982-92 9.64% 11.69% A
Lakeville, Minnesota 6/29/81 Cert. of Indebt. 170M 1982-86 9.64% 11.69% A
Lakeville, Minnesota 6/29/81 Warning System 90M 1982-90 9.64% 11.69% A
Fertile, Minnesota 6/30/81 Temp. Construction 350M 1982 8.94% 11.69% NR
White Bear Lake, Minnesota 6/30/81 Sewerage System 300M 1983-96 10.52% 11.69% A
White Bear Lake, Minnesota 6/30/81 G.O. Improvement 430M 1984-93 10.01% 11.69% A
Montevideo, Minnesota 7/6/81 0.0. Improvement 380M 1983-92 9.913% 11.79% A
Montevideo, Minnesota 7/6/81 G.O. Tax Inc. Redev. 550M 1988-94 11.2514% 11.79% A
WISCONSIN
Trempealeau County, Wisconsin 5/18/81 Jail Facility 1,600M 1982-91 9.3971% 11.82% A-1
West Milwaukee, Wisconsin 5/18/81 Promissory Notes 1,150M 1983-91 9.9564% 11.82% A
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 5/19/81 Corporate Purpose 2,980M 1982-94 9.0986% 11.82% Aaa
St. Croix County, Wisconsin 5/19/81 G.O. Health Care Ctr. 3,725M 1982-2000 10.40% 11.82% A
Saukville, Wisconsin 6/5/81 Sewerage Sys. Mort. Rev. 2,000M 1983-95 11.5245% 11.63% NR
Reedsburg, Wisconsin 6/8/81 Promissory Notes 1,050M 1984 8.71286% 11.54% A
Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin 6/9/81 Public Works 1,850M 1983-94 9.8509 11.59% A
Slinger, Wisconsin 6/12/81 Sewerage Sys. Mort. Rev. 1,300M 1983-95 11.44% 11.54% NR
DePere, Wisconsin 6/23/81 Promissory Notes 4,500M 1983-90 9.43% 11.69% A-1
NORTH AND SOUTH DAKOTA
Spearfish, South Dakota 5/12/81 G.O. Sewer Imp. 1,100M 1984-2001 10.952% 11.82% Baa-1
Bismarck, North Dakota 5/27/81 Temp. Imp. Warrants 2,420M 1984 8.99% 11.73% NR
Fairmount, North Dakota 6/1/81 Refunding Improvement 385M 1982-96 10.1677% 11.63% NR
Fargo, North Dakota 6/15/81 General Obligation 1,400M 1984-97 9.50424% 11.59% Aa
Dickinson, North Dakota 6/23/81 Refunding Improvement 5,025M 1984-98 10.123% 11.69% A
IOWA
Kanawha, Iowa 6/23/81 G.O. Bonds 210M 1983-93 9.3212% 11.69% NR
Sigourney, Iowa 6/24/81 Special Assess. 130M 1981-90 9.8961% 11.69% NR
Street Improve.
Sigourney, Iowa 6/24/81 G.O. Bonds 440M 1983-93 9.4485% 11.69% NR
Clarion, Iowa 6/22/81 Hosp. Rev. Ser. A 750M 1983-96 11.7702% 11.69% NR
Clarion, Iowa 6/22/81 G.U. Hosp. 350M 1983-96 9.5211 11.69% NR
Sioux City, Iowa 6/1/81 Str. Improve. 170M 1981-90 9.8934% 11.b3% NR
Coon Rapids, Iowa 6/9/81 G.O. Bonds 255M 1983-92 9.2444% 11.54% NR 411/1
Coon Rapids, Iowa 6/9/81 Pub. Improve. 76M 1981-90 9.9244% 11.54% NR
Gladbrook, Iowa 3/9/81 Str. Improve. 30M 1982-87 8.00% 11.37% NR
Solon, Iowa 6/18/81 G.O. San Sewer Imp. 260M 1983-96 9.5838% 11.59% NR
Warren Co., Iowa 5/22/81 Benefitted Water 378M 1981-90 5.00% 11.82% NR
(Indianola) Dist. Special Imp.
Cedar Falls, Iowa 7/13/81 G.O. Improve. Bonds 1,800M 1983-94 9.55% 11.92% A-1
/y
Public Invited
Public Hearings on the
Need for the Wilmarth
Line of the CU Project
October 26, 1981; 10:00 A.M.
American Legion Club
97 South Park
Le Center, Minnesota 56057
Public hearings by the Minnesota Energy Agency on the
need for the Wilmarth transmission line proposed by
Cooperative Power Association (CPA) and United Power
Association (U PA) will begin at 10:00 a.m. on October 26.
These Certificate of Need hearings are being held in
response to a decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court
and a related order to the Minnesota Energy Agency by the
Blue Earth County District Court.
The purpose of these hearings is to determine whether
there is a need by CPA and UPA for 1,000 megawatts from
the Coal Creek plant near Underwood, North Dakota; and
whether there is a need for the immediate completion of
the Wilmarth portion of the CU Project. The Wilmarth line
is a proposed 345 kilovolt (AC) transmission line that RECEIVED
would extend 78 miles from the Dickinson Substation near
Delano to the Wilmarth Substation near Mankato. AUG -
1
Hearings will be held at the following times and places: 19$
Date Location CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Oct. 26, 27, 28, & 29 American Legion Club,
Le Center
Nov. 2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 State Bank of Cologne,
Cologne
Nov. 9, 10, 11, 12, & 13 Watertown Mayer High
School, Watertown
More hearings will be scheduled if needed.
All hearing sessions will begin at 10:00 a.m., and there will
be evening sessions, commencing at 7:00 p.m., every night
except Friday.
Informational Meetings in August
Informational meetings will be held at the Le Center,
Cologne, and Watertown locations at 7:30 p.m. on August
17, 19, and 20, respectively. A representative of the Energy
Agency will summarize the application and explain the
hearing process and ways in which the public can par-
ticipate. No evidence will be gathered at these meetings.
Public Invited to Testify
The Public is invited to testify and present exhibits at the
public hearings.The public will have first priority to testify
at all evening sessions. Members of the public are urged to
make their presentations in person. If they cannot, they
may submit written comments prior to the close of the
hearings to the state-appointed hearing examiner,Allan W.
Klein,Office of Hearing Examiners, Room 300, 1745 Univer-
sity Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55104. Persons may also choose
to intervene as a full party in the process.The intervention
deadline is August 25, 1981.
For more information, or a copy of the Order for Hearing
and Notice which contains additional details on the hear-
ing process, contact Arthur L.Adiarte at the Energy Agency.
Toll-free number: 800-652-9747, or 612-296-8279.
Minnesota Energy Agency
980 American Center Building
150 East Kellogg Boulevard
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
800-652-9747 toll-free or 612-296-8279
Locket No. EA-81-003-AK I,,:
STATE OF MINNESOTA
MEN ESOTA ENEMY AGE/CY
In the Matter of the Reconsideration of the
Application of Cooperative Power Association ORDER FOR HEARING and
and United lower Association for a Certificate NOTICE THEREOF
of Need for a Large High-Voltage Transmission
Line and Associated Facilities.
NOTICE is hereby given that a contested case hearing concerning the above-
entitled matter will be held at the following times and places:
Date Location
(xtober 26, 27, 28 and 29 American Legion Club, Le Center
November 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 State Bank of Cologne
November 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 Watertown Mayer High School
All hearing sessions will begin at 10:00 a.m., and there will be evening
sessions, commencing at 7:00 p.m. , every night except for Friday nights. If
additional hearing sessions are needed, they will be scheduled by the Hearing
Examiner close to the end of the scheduled hearings. If, on the other hand,
there does not appear to be any need for the sessions scheduled on November 11,
12 or 13, then the Hearing Examiner may cancel any or all of those sessions by
so announcing on November 10.
This rehearing arises from an opinion of the Minnesota Supreme Court f iled
on November 7, 1980, In re Condemnation Proceedings for the Wilmarth Line of
the CU Project, 299 N.W.2d 731, and a related Order to the Minnesota Energy
Agency filed by the Blue Earth County District Court on January 29, 1981. In
response, Cooperative Power Association ( "CPA") , and United Power Association
("UPA" ) (jointly referred to as "Applicants" ) filed a Statement of Case with
the Minnesota Energy Agency on June 15, 1981.
The purpose of the rehearing is to determine whether the Applicants have
justified the need for 1,000 megawatts (hereinafter "MW" ) of generated power
in their systems from the Coal Creek Generating Plant near Underwood, North
Dakota; and whether they have justified the need for the immediate completion
of the Minnesota portion of the CU Project.
In 1975 and 1976, the Agency held public hearings to determine whether
there was a need for the Minnesota portion of the CU Project. In April of
1976, the Agency determined that there was a need for the project and granted
the Applicants a Certificate of Need to allow them to construct the project.
The Applicants sought and received from the Minnesota Environmental Quality
Board corridor and route certifications and construction permits. The Appli-
cants commenced construction, and all portions, of the CU Project have been
constructed and are operating, except for one transmission line known as the
Wilmarth Line. The Wilmarth Line is proposed to have a nominal voltage of 345
kilovolts (AC) , and would extend 78 miles, from the Dickinson Substation near
Delano to the Wilmarth Substation near Mankato. During the course of condem-
nation proceedings for the Wilmarth Line, the validity of the Certificate of
Need for the CU project was challenged. That challenge resulted in the 1980
Supreme Court opinion referred to above.
,
Pursuant to the Supreme Court decision, the first issue to be determined
at the rehearing is whether there is a need for 1,000 MW of generated power
from the Coal Creek Station in the Applicants' systems. The evidence con-
sidered in addressing this issue will include evidence of current and project-
ed need at the time of the rehearing. Need is a system-wide inquiry, and need
in specific areas within the Applicants' systems will be considered only to
the extent that it relates to, and is a part of, the basis of the systems-wide
need. The rehearing will address the accuracy of the Applicants' current
forecasts of need for energy in their systems, the ability of Applicants' sys-
tems to meet the forecast demand, and the effectiveness of conservation and
load management programs which might affect the need for 1,000 MW. Evidence
concerning the following subjects will not be considered at the rehearing:
The appropriateness of the route selected for the Wilmarth Line, the effect of
construction of the Wilmarth Line on individual landowners' parcels of land,
and (at this first stage) the need for three AC lines from the Dickinson
Substation.
If the Agency decides, as a result of this rehearing, that less than 1,000
MW of power are needed in Applicants' systems, the Supreme Court order pro-
vides that this proceeding will be reconvened to determine whether there is a
need for a third AC line (the Wilmarth Line) from the Dickinson Substation to
permit the Applicants' systems to function considering the reduced need.
In summary, all portions of the CU Project have been built, except for the
Wilmarth Line. If, after the rehearing, the Agency determines that the Appli-
cants have demonstrated a need for 1,000 MW of power for their systems, there
will be no further administrative hearings and the Wilmarth Line will be con-
structed. If, on the other hand, the Agency determines that the Applicants
have failed to show a need for 1,000 MW of power in their systems, then the
rehearing will be reconvened to determine whether the Wilmarth Line is needed
to permit the Applicants' systems to function considering the reduced need.
The rehearing will be held before Allan W. Klein, Hearing Examiner, Room
300, 1745 University Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55104, telephone (612)
296-8104, an independent hearing examiner appointed by the Chief Hearing Exam-
iner of the State of Minnesota.
The rehearing will be conducted pursuant to the contested case procedures
set out in Minn. Stat. §§ 15.0411 through 15.052 (1980) and procedural rules 9
MCAR §§ 2.201-.222 and 6 MCAR §§ 2.500-.520. Where the procedural rules con-
flict, the Hearing Examiner's rules (9 MCAR §§ 2.201-.222) supersede the Agen-
cy's rules (6 MCAR §§ 2.500-.520) . Questions concerning the issues raised in
this order or concerning discovery pursuant to 9 MCAR § 2.214 may be directed
to Dwight S. Wagenius, Special Assistant Attorney General, 720 American Center
Building, 150 E. Kellogg Boulevard, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612)
296-8278, or Hearing Examiner Klein.
There are two different ways in which persons may participate in this re-
hearing. They can participate as members of the public, or they may partici-
pate as parties.
If a person elects to participate as a member of the public, he or she
will be allowed to offer testimony and present exhibits or other evidence.
Such persons will have first priority at the evening sessions scheduled to
- 2 -
II
i L.¢.
begin at 7:00 p.m. However, if these times are inconvenient, other times can
be arranged by contacting the hearing examiner.
If a person elects to participate as a party, he or she must file a Peti-
tion to Intervene with the hearing examiner. The required contents of this
document are spelled out in Rules 9 MCAR § 2.210 and 6 MCAR § 2.506, copies of
which are available as described below. The Petition to Intervene must be
received by the hearing examiner on or before August 25, 1981. However, early
intervention is strongly encouraged. Copies must also be served on the Agen-
cy, c/o Dwight S. Wagenius, at the address given above, and on known parties
at the time of intervention. At the present time, there are several known
parties in addition to the Applicants. A complete service list may be obtain-
ed from Hearing Examiner Klein or from Mr. Wagenius.
If the Petition to Intervene is granted by the Hearing Examiner, the per-
son submitting it becomes a party, with certain rights and obligations not
shared by persons who elect to participate as members of the public. Parties
must attend prehearing conferences, and must prefile their testimony and exhi-
bits in advance of the rehearing. They must file a Notice of Appearance with-
in 20 days after publication of this Order and Notice of Hearing in the State
Register or after their intervention is accepted, but, in any case, prior to
the start of the rehearing. They must file proposed findings and conclusions
(unless excused by the hearing examiner). Parties have the right to advance
notice of witnesses and evidence, to cross-examine the witnesses, to object to
Petitions to Intervene, to request an Order for Depositions, to use other dis-
covery devices, and to file comments on and exceptions to proposed findings
and recommendations of the hearing examiner. These are some, but not all, of
the differences between a party and a person participating as a member of the
public. Persons desiring additional information are referred to the procedur-
al rules cited above.
A prehearing conference will be held pursuant to 9 MCAR § 2.213 A. at 9:15
a.m. on October 13, 1981 at the Energy Agency Conference Room, 9th floor,
American Center Building, 150 E. Kellogg Boulevard in St. Paul. The purpose
of this prehearing conference will be to consider objections to the prefiled
testimony and exhibits, and any other substantive or procedural matters.
Applicants will file their prefiled testimony and exhibits by September 1,
1981. Intervenors will file their prefiled testimony and exhibits by
September 29, 1981.
The Minnesota Energy Agency has designated a person to facilitate citizen
participation in the rehearing process. That person is Arthur Adiarte, who
can be reached by mail or telephone at 980 American Center Building, St. Paul,
Minnesota 55101, (612) 296-8279.
All persons are advised that no factual information or evidence which is
not part of the bearing record shall be considered by the hearing examiner or
by the Director in the determination of this matter. Persons attending the
hearing should bring all evidence bearing on the case, including any records
or other documents.
All of the rules cited above are available for review at the Office of
Administrative Hearings and at the office of the Energy Agency. The Appli-
cant's Statement of the Case is available for review at the following
- 3 -
l
libraries: The Polk County-Crookston Library; the Chippewa County Library in
'bntevideo; the East Central Regional Library in Cambridge; the Bemidji Public
Library; the Duluth Public Library; the Fergus Falls Public Library; the
Kitchigami Regional Library in Pine River; the Marshall-Lyon County Library in
Marshall; and the Rochester Public Library. The prefiled testimony, the Ap-
plicants' Statement of the Case and the substantive rules applicable to this
matter, 6 MCAR §§ 2.0601-0646, are available for review at the Offices of
Administrative Hearings and the Energy Agency and at the following libraries:
The Minnesota Valley Regional Library in Mankato; the Crow River Regional
Library in Willmar; the Legislative Reference Library in the State Capitol;
the Great River Regional Library in St. Cloud; and the Environmental Conserva-
tion Library, 300 Nicollet Mall in Minneapolis. The prefiled exhibits are
available for review at the Office of Administrative Hearings and the Energy
Agency Office. All rules may be purchased from the Documents Division, De-
partment of Administration, 117 University Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155,
telephone (612) 296-2874.
All parties have the right to be represented by legal counsel, by a person
of their choice if not otherwise prohibited as the unauthorized practice of -
law, or they may represent themselves. Existing parties are advised that
failure to appear at the hearings may result in the affirmation of the
Certificate of Need for the CU project.
If persons have good reason for requesting a delay in the hearing, the
request must be made in writing to the hearing examiner as soon as possible,
but at least five days prior to the hearing. A copy of the request must be
served on the Agency and any other parties.
Dated this /6 iay of July, 1981.
MARK MPSCN
Director
/, (2
ALLAN W. KLEIN
Hearing Examiner
- 4 -
i
/5
TOM HAGEDORN DISTRICT OFFICES:
2ND DISTRICT.MINNESOTA P.Q.Box 3148
MANKATO,MINNESOTA 56001
COMMITTEES:
(507)387-8226
PUBLIC AGRICULTURE WORKS AND Congre55 of tlje Elniteb 6tate5 ALBERT SOUTH
TR
MINNESOSS6OO7
TRANSPORTATION (507)377-7676
gouge of RepreOentatibeS RONALD K.ENCE
WASHINGTON OFFICE:
}y ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
2344 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING aci:,' ton, /le. 20515
WASHINGTON,D.C. 20515 / �1
(202)225-2472
July 29, 1981
Mr. John K. Anderson
AUG 3 - 1981
City Administrator
City of Shakopee CITY Oil 5HHAtc EPEE
129 E. First Ave.
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Thank you very much for your letter expressing your opposition
to proposed reductions in federal Revenue Sharing funds. I appreciate
your taking the time to share your view with me.
Although the Administration's original budget proposals did
include a cut of approximately $340 million in Revenue Sharing funds,
the Latta-Gramm Substitute, which passed the House on May 7 with my
support and which was endorsed by President Reagan, has no effect on
Revenue Sharing. As a strong proponent of the General Revenue Sharing
Program, I feel it is essential to continue providing this type of "no
strings attached" federal funding to both State and local governments.
This system allows the states and localities to plan and implement
important programs which are specifically designed to meet the needs
of their citizens.
If this essential aid were to be eliminated, taxpayers would not
only be burdened with additional sales and property taxes, but would
also be forced to obtain funding through other federal sources, such
as the categorical grant program. As we all know, the rules,
regulations, and bureaucracy spawned by these programs is enormous.
All available evidence has convinced me that federal Revenue
Sharing is a fiscally sound way to decentralize our government and
eliminate some excessive federal regulations. I believe that by
returning decision-making power to the level closest to the people,
these funds can be put to the best and most efficient use.
Again, thank you for writing. I hope you will continue to keep
me informed of your views in other issues of mutual interest and
concern. With kind regards, I am
Sincerely, rzwr0 V
(jai / , ./
AUG3 - 1981
OM HAGE11 'N
Member • Congress CITY OF SHAKOPEE
TH/lb
AD HOC CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE
Shakopee , Minnesota
Special Session August 11 , 1981
Chairman Foudray called the meeting to order at 7 : 26 p .m. in the
Conference Room at City Hall with Committee members present :
Christensen, Davis , Gorman, Kirchmeier. Committee member Abeln
was late . Also present was Jeanne Andre , Administrative Assis-
tant .
Gorman/Davis moved that the invitation by Zylstra Communications
to attend a presentation on August 19, 1981 , regarding institu-
tional uses of a cable communications system is out of order due
to the adoption of Resolution 1796 which establishes a policy re-
lated to communications from cable communications companies .
Lillian Abeln arrived at 7 : 34 p.m.
Discussion followed on the appropriateness of the invitation .
Motion carried.
Discussion was held on the public hearing to be conducted by the
City Council later in the evening. Jeanne Andre explained staff
memos which were supplied to the Council members for the hearing,
including the preliminary information for the uniform data section
of the request for proposals , further information on potential
commercial uses of cable , and a memo explaining that Consultant
Anita Benda could not attend the public hearing to make a presen-
tation and suggesting the public hearing be continued until August
18 , 1981 to provide for the presentation .
Committee members Abeln and Christensen expressed an interest in
attending the workshop on Community Access for Cable TV to be held
September 11 and 12 , 1981 , if the City will sponsor their regis-
tration fee .
Christensen/Abeln moved to recommend the staff alternative for con-
tinuation of the public hearing until August 18, 1981 , allowing
for public comment at both the August 11th and 18th meetings .
Mr . Kirchmeier stated that although the City Council had requested
Consultant Benda to make a presentation , this was not the recom-
mendation of the Committee and he would prefer no recommendation
to the Council from the Committee regarding continuation of the
public hearing, so that they might consider holding the hearing
and adopting the Request for Porposals at the August 11 , 1981
meeting.
Roll call vote was taken on the motion
Ayes : Gorman , Christensen, Abeln Motion failed.
Noes : Kirchmeier, Davis , Foudray
Gorman/Davis moved to adjourn at 7 : 57 p.m.
R. Gene Foudray Jeanne Andre
Chairman Recording Secretary
t^ ,'„ .�.�, .�.., 'v' L+:e;".ts x ... ....."'i°'�" 401,c
70 7
J
V
SHAKOPEE EASTSIDE PARK STEERING COMMITTEE
The steering committee met on July 28, 1981 at 8 p.m. at the home
of Jane Carlson, 1053 Sibley.
The following were present: Jane Carlson, Phillis Martinson,
George Muenchow, Bob Langer, Dallas Peterson, Chuck Rieck, Jim Cook
Jim Kephart.
President Jim Cook called the meeting to order and requested the
reading of the min:.rtes .
Jim Cook reported that he talked to the City Treasurer, who will
send us purchase order forms .
•
There was a general discussion on the possible complications of
setting the house on the floor. This will be straightened out. The
shelter/warming house will be moved Wednesday night or Thursday
morning. Jim Cook will be there to be sure its put on right.
Jim Kephart has ordered the boards to be put around the sides of the
building and Jim Cook and Chuck Rieck will put up the sides . Friday
morning Ames Construction (Jim Kephart) will grade the dirt around the
structure.
Jim Cook has contacted the MINT and they are doing a story with
pictures of the shelter/warming house and of all the people and work
involved.
We have spent 12,000 for the purchase of the structure, 12,700 to have
it moved and 11,000 for the foundation, Floor and dividing walls . We
still need shingles , paint, insulation, cage, heaters , wardware, door, etc
Once the shelter/warming house is on the foundation the committee
will have to meet to evaluate the necessary work needed to be done. -
George Muenchow will expediate the staking out of the skating rink
and Jim Cook and George Muenchow will try to get the necessary grading
for the hockey rink - its not done yet.
The playground eq uipment is to be here in mid-August and the city park
crew will put up the equipment.
Jim Cook will check with the local Ker-Sun dealers for the necessary
heating units .
Jim Cook expressed hie pleasure with the co-operation everyone
demonstrated in getting the foundation and floor done . A special thanks
to Jim Kephart for his expert 'supervision.
George Muenchow brought up the neighbourhood picnic idea -- with a
September target date .
The meeting was adjourned. The next meeting is scheduled for August
4, 1981 at 7 p.m. at the home of Gwen Ellingeon, 1125 Merrifield Court.
Respectfully submitted.
Gwen Ellingson.
. . - Z-6 net_ /Lie/
i S AKOPEE EAST IDE T'A: {' STE,E?INGr CC'!")!ITTrE 7•
The steering committee met on August 4th, 1981 at 7 p.m. at the home
of Gwen Ellingson, 1125 Merrifield Court.
The following were present : Jim Cook, Bob Laneer, Jim Kephart,
Chuck Rieck, Jane Carlson.
President Jim Cook called the meeting to order and requested the
reading of the minutes .
Jim Cook r. eportedthat Bill Doepke (the mover of the building) had
lowered the cost of moving the building by $200.00. We were all pleased
at this development. Jim Cook reported that ne had looted and secured
the building.
We then as a committee made a list of the necessary things to be done
Put on Porch (Will ask LeRoy Hauser to look into this )
Shingles to be put on.
Dutch door is in rough shape.
Repair sliding doors .
Anchor house on foundation.
Deodorize the building.
Dividing wall to be put in.
Repair broken windows and install window guards .
Repair holes in wails .
Finish grading for warming house and hockey rink.
Need rubber mats for floor so skates won't wreck the floor.
Stain for outside.
Cupulo for roof.
Heaters and cage for same.
Insulation.
Benches .
Electricity and lights, switches and plug ins .
Make feeding troughs to be used for flower boxes .
Chuck Rieck reported that Mr. Norton would sell us stain at wholesale
price.
Chu
k
ck
s
d
on thecroofeof the porch. toActentativeudateck oforrnthis was thefor his pwen putting
of August 15. eken
There was a discussion on the need to find other persons in the
neighbourhood who would be wil.linE to help in doing all. of those projects .
Some names that were suggested were : Harlan Lipker, Fran Slavic,
Chuck Norton, Gary Carlson and- LeRoy Hauser.
It was decided that the first thing necessary to be done would be to
deodorize the building and Jim Eephart offered to call Butch to ask him
to hose off the building both inside and outside.
Jim Kephart offered to bring some lag bolts to attach the building to
the foundation and it was decided to do this Thusday evening. The
men will also attempt to fix the doors at this time. They will also
fix the windows .
ir------------ n
c. 17
Jim Kephart offered to contact Lou Van Hout uo that he can put in
the electricity, for us . Jim offered to show Lou just where the lights ,
switches, outlets and everything should be placed.
The committee visited the buil ling site and decided where the
partition should be placed , boarded up one window and decided where
• the heater should ' o, and whore lights should be installed and also
decided that we would need plywood for the loft. The men plan on working
on the build inr; on Thursday eveninFr and anain on Saturday, any help
they can get will be ap -`rec' ed
The meeting was ad jo"+.rned and fte n(?xt meet. r will be held on
August 11 at 7 p. m. at the sh-.al ter,'warninsr h.)use site.
Respectfully ;',ub ittcd.
Gwen M.917: son,
SHAKOPEE EASTSIDE PARK STEERING COMMITTEE /127
The steering committee met on August 11, 1981 at 7 p.m. at the
shelter/warming house.
The following were present: Jim Cook, Bob Langer, Jim Kephart,
Chuck Rieck, Jane Carlson, Phillis Martinson, George Muenchow.
President Jim Cook called the meeting to order and requested the
reading of the minutes .
Jim Kephart reported that Lou Van Hout will be bringing in the
electricity to the building within the next two weeks . Jim Cook
reported that Eldon Rienke has offeredtoMr doe the wihe risngffordthtoe do
building within the next two weeks and
this for free, we were all pleased with this report. A discussion
followed on where the lights were to go.
Chuck Rieck reported that Chuck Norton willbe available to help
put on the porch and shingles on August 22 and Mr. Norton will bring
his own portable generator to help us in doing the work. Mr. Norton
will need six to eight people to help in doing the work. Chuck Rieck
has offered to co-ordinate all of '„his.
Jim. Cook reported that we cannot get shingles from Certain-Teed.
Jane Carlson has offered to talk with her neighbour concerning shingles
and insulation. Chuck Rieck will talk to Chuck Norton concerning shingles
and insulation.
This past Thursday and weekend the men put up part of the dividing
wall - Got the walls framed up for the heating area - startedattaching
the building to the foundation and put a slide on the sliding
We then all went inside the building to view the work already done.
This weekend the men hope to finish the wdo the floor -noored finish
the partition and put in vents - plug the holes -
puand they figure they will need four to six people to do this .
It was decided that on August 22 the porch would be put on and the
shingles attached.
George Muenchow reported that the playgro , d eauip ent is here and
it is hoped that it can be put up withinnext
There was a discussion on the need for insulation
and
also
a discussion
on the porch. It was reported that our money ianwas
vThere is a special thanks goin(;> to Jim Kephart and Chuck Rieck for
they were the ones who hosed down the inside of the building. Thanks
fellows .
The meeting adjourned andthe next meeting will be held August 25
at 7 p.m. at the shelter/war.1ing house .
Respectfully submitted,
Gwep Eilineson
1
MINUTES OF INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL COMMISSION
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JULY 8, 1981
Vice-Chrm. O'Neill called the meeting to order at 5:10 P.M.
Present: Commissioner Furrie
Advisor Eastlund
Liaison Wermerskirchcn
City Assessor, Larry Martin
Absent: Commissioners Raduenz and Peterson
Arriving later: Commissioner Woodwnrd
City Admr. , John K. Anderson
Advisor Eastlund stated there was an error in the minutes of May 13, 1981, in that
Ray Foslid was not going to make copies of the slide presentation. Eastlund will
be making those copies and providing them.
Furrie/O'Neill moved to approve the minutes of May 13, 1981 with the change of
deleting the paragraph referring to Ray Foslid making copies of the slide presenta-
tion used for Industrial Day. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Admr. arrived at this point, 5:15 P.M.
Comm. O'Neill initiated discussion about the comparison valuations of Savage,
Prior Lake, Chaska and Jordan received from the City Assessor.
Comm. Woodward arrived at this point, 5:20 P.M.
Comm. Furrie asked the Assessor about the inter-city comparisons in valuations and
how they compare with actual building costs. The Assessor responded that the valua-
tions are lower than the building costs. They are about 85% of costs listed on the
building permits. The building square footage value is replacement costs minus
depreciation.
Comm. O'Neill asked the Assessor if he thinks the valuations are right after com-
paring other communities. He stated the building valuations don't look that bad,
but because of new industries and no new schools, the taxes shoulf be going down.
The Assessor stated it was hard to tell as some of the figures he received were so
erratic.
The City Admr. informed the Commission about what had occurred with the Kmart Dis-
tribution Center. Kmart had challenged the City on its valuation and eventually
the Assessor had recommended lowering the valuation because of the evidence produced.
Comm. O'Neill stated that he still thinks Shakopee is on the high side of the range
of valuations, but he doesn't know yet if it is because of the mill rate, valuation,
taxes, or what. The valuations here look about medium to high.
Comm. Furrie commented that the valuations are reasonable if they are 85% of costs
submitted on the building permit.
Comm. O'Neill stated it would be helpful to see the breakdown of the mill rates for
other communities. The Assessor stated he had a Citizen's League ranking list that
he could show the Commission.
Shakopee ICC
July 8, 1981
Page 2
rL;
Comm. O'Neill asked the City Admr. why he selected Minnetonka and Bloomington as
models for an Industrial Revenue Bond policy. The City Admr. replied that the
Council wants to study our IRB policy because they don't think the present one is
tight enough. He wanted to show them everything that is available, and Minnetonka
and Bloomington have very complete policies.
Comm. Furrie stated he felt we shout_ set forth what is required of the City by
State Statute and then go from there.
Advisor Eastlund left at this point, 6:05 P.M.
The City Assessor brought back copies of the Citizen' s League ranking list on the
1981 taxes in various communities and distributed them. Further discussion was
held comparing cities.
The Commission requested from the Assessor a breakdown of the mill rates for city,
county and schools for Savage, Prior Lake, Chaska, Jordan, Jackson Township and
Lakeville for next month's meeting.
The Assessor left at this point, 6:20 P.M.
Comm. O'Neill remarked that the Tax Increment Policy adopted by the City was not
received by the Commission members, and asked that the City Admr. provide it to the
members.
Comm. O'Neill stated he just went through the IRB application in Minnetonka and had
several suggestions to make about that policy. Minnetonka will not allow the cost of
interim financing/soft costs. It only allows the land and building. He feels this
is very discriminatory, as it just cuts out the little guy. There should be 100%
financing by IRB.
Comm. Furrie suggested that instead of commenting directly on other communities'
IRB policies, we should get the State requirements and leave the financing to the
lender. We should start from ground and write a new policy.
Comm. O'Neill stated the IRB's have been abused. It was originally intended to be
job creating for industrial. The applicant should prove to the community that it
is a benefit to the City.
Comm. O'Neill said he would like to have everyone read the policy and be prepared
to discuss it at the next meeting.
Furrie/Woodward moved to have the City Admr. ask the Ass't City Attorney for copies
of the State Statute that give the City authority to pass resolutions and outline
what its responsibilities are in passing that resolution. Motion carried unanimously.
Comm. O'Neill stated the City wants to evaluate the equity position of the developer,
and the City Council shouldn't be concerned with this aspect; the lending agency's
approval should be adequate for the City.
Comm. O'Neill stated that Jim Raduenz has verbally resigned from the ICC due to his
involvement with his children and his inability to attend meetings, and he will be
sending a letter to the City Admr.
Plir Shakopee ICC
July 8, 1981
Page 3 J
Comm. O'Neill reported that the City Council accepted their recommendations of
John Manahan and Paul Wermerskirchen as new members of the ICC. He suggests these
two be included in the next mailings. Manahan is at 1221 East Fourth Avenue, and
Wermerskirchen a't the Register of Deeds office, Courthouse.
Comm. O'Neill stated he discussed the Star City Program with the City Planner. It
is a program the Minn. Lept. of Economic Development has instigated to help com-
munities prepare for and encourage growth. The City Planner has taken the beginning
steps in initiating a program to particpate in this Star City Program. Now it is
being presented to the ICC to take further action if desired.
Comm. O'Neill stated it looks like a lot of work we would be doing for the State
Dept. , with questionable value. We would have to establish a local development
corporation, a 5 year plan, 1 yr. action plan, 5 yr. capital improvement plan,
community facts bulletin, etc. He will make copies of the program and requirement
and have it sent out to the members.
Comm. Furrie commented that a lot of those requirements are already done, so maybe
it wouldn't be a lot of work.
Liaison Wermerskirchen asked what is to be gained by doing it. Comm. O'Neill answered
that if someone comes in from out of state, the Minn. Dept. of Economic Development
will make a recommendation that the person or company go to a community that is a
Star City.
Furrie/Woodward moved to ask the City Planner to attend our next meeting for a few
minutes to give a quick run-down of his impressions and ideas on the program.
Motion carried unanimously.
Woodward/Furrie moved to adjourn to August 12, 1981 at 5:00 P.M. Motion carried
unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 6:55 P.M.
Jim O'Neill
Vice Chairman •
Diane 3. Beuch
Recording Secretary
MINUTES UTES OF /
THE
SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
(SPECIAL MEETING)
The Shakopee Public
July 13, 1981 Utilities
ate 6:30P. Commission
in the SPUC convened in
offices, special
Commissioner
session on
of the Commission.of
offered a
deliberati
MEMBERS per,. prayer for divine guidance in the
SENT: ons
Van flout. Commissioners Bishop, Nolting and Reinke. Also Manger
The rate for the
field were discussed.
baseball field, tennis
to a meter final figures courts, and hi
problem at t Sures were not known high school football
The he baseball field, for comparison at this
sports eve consensus was: that
events would be at electric usage for hi
eventsven. s should be at the standard commerical
cric rate, serviceut thats
h school age and younger
c rates for sports
t
The Senior services
the tennis High School °f this
courts would be football field
baseball field would on the Commerical Demand
be co
type and have Co all small
billed accordingly.
ccordingl . bill Demand rate, commerical rate,
Y. splitand he
in proportion tot Riverside
Motion by Reinke the usage of each
carried. seconded by Nolting that meeting be adjourned. Motion
•u V.n Flout, Manager
1
MINUTES OF THE
SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
(REGULAR MEETING)
The Shakopee Public Utilities convened in regular session on July
8, 1981 at 4:30 P.M. in the Utilities meeting room.
Commissioner Bishop offered a prayer for divine guidance in the deliberations
of the Commission.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Bishop, Reinke and Nolting. Also Manger
Van Hout and Secretary Barbara Menden.
Motion by Nolting, seconded by Reinke that the minutes of the June 1, 1981
regular meeting be approved as kept. Motion carried.
Dr. W. Adair Muralt was present to represent the Chamber of Commerce and
make a request to the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission for a crew to move the
lights from the hockey rink to the rodeo grounds and back. Also a request was
made for a donation of the electricity used for the rodeo.
Motion by Nolting, seconed by Reinke to approve the donation of labor for
the moving of the lights for the rodeo for the Chamber of Commerce. Motion
carried. The Commission asked that the electric usage be recorded and brought
before them at the conclusion of the rodeo.
Ron Ward and Jack Cole were present to discuss the electricity used for
the Tennis Court located on Junior High property. The School assumed responsibility
for the billing of the electricity at the time the tennis courts were installed.
At the present time it is a losing propostion. 'A request was made to change the
type of rate the courts were being billed at. George Muncheow from the Shakopee
Community Services was also present to make the same request for the baseball
field at Riverside Park. The Commission decided to take it under advisement.
Manager Van Hout was directed to gather data on both facilities and the Senior
High Football field so a rational decision could be made. A special meeting will
be held to discuss this matter July 13, 1981, at 6:30 P.M.
Administrator John Anderson arrived to discuss a bill from Schoell and
Madson which had been sent down to City Hall for payment. A discussion followed.
Motion by Nolting, seconded by Reinke that the bill for Schoell and Madson be
allowed and ordered paid in the amount of $183.00. Motion carried.
BILLS READ:
City of Shakopee $20(032,00
Anderson Electric 1.25
Auto Central Supply 51,.38
B & B Transformer 580.00
Battery & Tire Warehouse Ince 34,10
Bills Toggery 103,33
Bob's Small Engine 34,45
Border States Electric Supply 890,00.
Burmeister Electric Company 220,76
Burroughs Corporation 54,96
Burroughs Corporation 358,86
Burroughs Corporation 28 90
Cpaesius Agency Inc. 147,50
City of Shakopee $12,821.62
City of Shakopee 1,921.15
Dick's Service Station 4.50
Dunnings Hdwe 96.28
Feed-Rite Controls, Inc. 1, 196.03
Gopher Electric Co. 185.10
Graybar Electric 3,494.17
Hennen Skelly Service 10.00
Industrial Sales & Service 187.14
Krass, Meyer & Kanning 66.00
Layne Minnesota Company 26.76
Edmond S. Leaveck 749.48
Leef Bros. Inc. 37.80
Mn Valley Tesing Laboratories Inc. 175.00
Motor Parts Service 127.95
Ted Neisen 156.00
Northern States Power Company 264. 10
Northern States Power Company 264.10
Northern States Power Company 1,232.48
Northern States Power Company 140,540.38
Northland Electric Supply Co. 288.74
Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. 221.08
Chas Olson & Sons 242.61
River Electric Association 268.00
Sand Mechanical Inc. 31.27
Schoell & Madson, Inc. 1,848.05
Serco Laboratories 52.00
Shakopee Ford Inc. 106.95
Shakopee Lumber Co 26.25
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission 340.53
S.P.U.C. VOIDED 15,738.35 VOIDED
Shakopee Services 18.00
Shive-Hattery & Associates 1,000.00
Shakopee Valley News 256.81
Software Consultants 500.00
Starks Cleaning Service 8.65
State Planning Agency 1,932.20
Suel Business Equipment 21.01.
Total Tool Supply Inc. 602.44
Valley Industrial Propane, Inc. 9.65
Water Products Company 5,782.18
WESCO 2,510.97
Motion by Reinke, seconded by Nolting, that the bills be allowed and ordered
paid. Motion carried.
Motion by Reinke, seconded by Nolting to approve the Co. Rd. 16 watermain
project east of Co. Rd. 17 per plan approval where the Shakopee Public Utilities
Commission will accept no charges for this project. Motion carried.
The property for the pole yard was discussed. A letter will be drafted
from SPUC to City Council that SPDC will begin negotiations to acquire the former
Railrod property to provide future expansion of the pole yard. Motion carried.
Motion by Reinke, seconed by Nolting to accept Transamerica as our insurance
carrier for the year 1981-1982 and that we direct Manager to request a notice from
the Insurance Company in 1982 as to our insurance status. Motion carried.
Motion by Nolting, seconded by Reinke that Manager be allowed to attend
the Distribution conference on Sept 20-25, 1981 and whoever else he designates
to go. Motion carried.
The next regular SPDC meeting will be August 3, 1981 at 4:30 P.M.
Motion by Reinke, seconded by Nolting that the meeting be adjourned.
Motion carried.
'ou fan Hout, Manager
of l/
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE : 1982 Local #320 (Public Works) Labor Negotiations
DATE : August 14, 1981
Introduction
Local #320 has submitted their "demands" for 1982 dated July 29 ,
1981 (attached) . The Local is currently under a three year con-
tract effective January 1 , 1980 through December 31 , 1982 . All
contract provisions are set for the full three year period
except the employee ' s contribution for Medical and Life Insurance
for 1982 and employee wages for 1982 .
Background
The demands submitted by Local #320 include wages , insurance and
uniforms . The latter item is not eligible for negotiation in
1982 and should not be discussed. The wage demand is for a
$1 . 15 per hazer increase and insurance demand for payment by
the City of the full premium. Compare the metro rates in the
attached survey prepared by Mike Pelach. From the survey it becomes
apparent that a large number of cities have gone with an 80¢
per hour increase for Heavy Equipment Operators , equalling an
8. 67 increase , and Light Equipment Operators , equalling an 97
increase (note a large number of Cities have only these two
position classifications with a 2 or 3 year progressive pay plan
starting at 80% of the top pay when hired rather than the seven
positions Shakopee currently has) .
Wage Alternatives
1 . If Shakopee awarded a percentage increase of 9% for 1982 it
would equal 84¢ for our Heavy Equipment Operator placing
them within 1¢ per hour of the metro average and 79¢ for
our Light Equipment Operator placing them within 6¢ per
hour of the metro average . The 9% would be internally
consistent with the police (they also had a 97 change in
their longevity) .
2 . A second approach could be to offer the same 80¢ per hour
that most of the other cities have offered which would
mean putting Shakopee within 5¢ per hour of the average
wage for Heavy Equipment Operators and 5¢ per hour for
the Light Equipment Operators .
3 . A third alternative would be to award an 85¢ per hour
increase which would be designed to bring both positions
up to the metro average per hour salary.
1982 Local #320 (Public Works) Labor Negotiations
August 14, 1981
Page Two
Insurance Alternatives
For 1981 , Shakopee has a $95 maximum City contribution per month
much like a large number of metropolitan area cities . The survey
shows that, although there are some variations , a large number
of cities have provided a $10 per month increase in this benefit
for 1982 raising the maximum City contribution to $105 . The
City could consider offering the same $10 increase thus paralleling
what most cities have done and at the same time achieve internal
consistance between Public Works and Police which will be at the
$105 maximum in 1982 .
Summary
Council can select from a number of goals in deciding how it would
like to handle the negotiation:
1 . Council can try to hold all costs down to minimize pressure
on our budget/taxes .
2 . Council can try to obtain internal consistency.
3 . Council can try to maintain pay rates comparable to Metro
averages .
4. Council can try to accomplish part of each of 1-3 above.
I have talked briefly with Larry Evans , the business agent and
negotiator for Local #320. I believe the union will be looking
primarily at 2 and 3 above , and that they would like to resolve
this quickly. If City Council (1) follows the pattern of looking
at the metro average as it did for Police and (2) follows up
on its action last spring of begin to equalize the fringe benefits
to City employees by paying the same insurance maximum of $105
in 1982 for all employees , then the City will also be setting
its goal as 2 and 3 above .
Recommendation
That the City ' s goal(s) in negotiation be numbers 2 and 3 above .
That the final agreement be 85¢ per hour for wages and $105
maximum per month health benefit .
JKA/jms
/ ` MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC & LAW ENPOPCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION �,� ,,,,
y'``� ' LOCAL NO. 320 ' t j
'f %;N.. 4 4 --E�R:a��,,,,Il
�Q affiliated with the 1, ;,74.7,,,7
' '! INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA -troy,/
3001 University Avenue S.E. — Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 --- Phone (6-12) 331-3873
.t .3
July 29, 1981
A E et IV 7. .„b
Mr. John K. Anderson 4W. 3 0 1981
City Administrator
129 East First Avenue CITY OF $}{ ®i�EE
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
RE: 1982 Contract Demands
Public Works Department
Dear Mr. Anderson:
The following are contract demands submitted to you on behalf of our
membership employed by the City of Shakopee in the Public Works
Department.
1. Wages: $1.15 per hour applied to all steps. Mechanic to receive
25¢ per hour above H.E.O. rate.
2. Insurance: The employer shall pay full premium for employee and
dependents.
3. Uniforms: The employer shall furnish uniforms for all employees
in the Department.
The Union reserves the right to change and/or modify its demands during
the course of negotiations. Any items not changed or modified shall
remain in full force and effect.
Sincerely,
TEAMSTERS LOCAL NO. 320
(7 )etitic,)tztA.,02._ ,-- --NC-C"1/14-1
Lawrence E. Evans
Business Agent
LEE/azo
opeiu-12
cc: Joe Honermann
I
United To Protect
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Main Street Sanitary Sewer Insulation
DATE : August 13 , 1981
Introduction
The Main Street Sanitary Sewer Insulation project uncovered the
fact that many of the sewer tile were broken and/or defective .
After looking at the site, I concurred with the City Engineer
that it should be replaced before being insulated.
Change Order Policy
The Main Street job is a $4200 project which was appended to the
Hauer Lateral project by Change Order August 4, 1981 . The Hauer
Lateral project itself had a $1000 individual change order/quantity
change and $4000 aggregate change order/quantity change . Other
than the initial $4200 Main Street change order there has been no
change order/quantity changes for the Hauer Lateral project .
The cost of the new pipe is approximately $500 and the original
bid included a quantity price so no negotiation is required on
price . The cost will be to the Sewer Fund along with the original
$4200.
Summary
This memo is thus presented to inform you of this change at your
next regular meeting. I am treating the change as a $500 quantity
change which is less than the $1000 limit and within the original
$4000 aggregate. Since this is the first change , there is $3500
left within the aggregate limit .
JKA/jms
L. _
- -
L4 L4,L4:A A'W CA(Ai • U u u u u u u,A CA,Cm(A :A (A u u u • W u u CA L.A.W GWCA u.A u W W.... W ,A 41 u u 11 r
JI Al JI UI U1 V JI '_n • U W W u :A co u W .A:w w L4 CM CA W W • • .] ) .3 Sr C -A
N.''h• 4 1 9.'4 0 • S UI O u W(A u N N•N N '- .4 .3.� • u.A,u W(A u u u.0 co.. ... N N.•'h. n z J7
N h••i) 44 p'V,T al' • 0•J•::).PN r.i(AN'h- -.: r1 D V T Ji • .O )) V 2. Ll a UNN .A U19. AN .. • N'4 T 1.. .la •-
0
I.'0;m r) .4;a <ny 7 Nan'-0 0 D r n VY''3 ton J S 2.2 r• Z Co •'1 rn L 2 T Z2-0 O :'n a 13 r -4 11 0 ,1 07 C n
N r 2 2 Z a a a. A '7 7 0''0 -1 .1 J...-1.O -4''1 . o o'm .-• .r-4:r i un m r C.O n.-.-.44TH'.. a .. 1iIS m 2,-1 I•. I
(n ...0 Cr n'.-e r M. a C a cc;r- a-..n < a'r- a -4 n1 V 4440 n rn 73:m C r-0 C-.'O:a(,) 47 2 1'n lcl J. in r-' , 2 -4•• -•
rt 2'. .-. . .4 r r' 2 a z 2.. -+ a s.»-4'.-. mi a . a.»C 01in m CI rl 1".' -rs r r r, a an n c ti n. a . 4, ••
✓ Cr 13I2 m m: .. -4-410 '1 n r r min m 1 a(n rn z • gin:-. 73 a x al r . A 0 'o (n D n (2 I
(n n.0 rl rm'. -4 (1), .3 N -Im 2 m 11'• -4 rum N' -4123 7 2.....-4.. m P.'7, r 13! r- m:7 'O
2 2.A In< N m n: t 1 2 m G) O 4. C7 11 m O m' 2 .N 46 n ►. L 3.a n cc -•7•.r'. 24...-fm N m --n
•'1m a Amr 9. 0' P 20AI000Amr'-4A O.GIO2. (nl AOln 73000;73mC-I nr 00;23< nZ1
Z ma;h. 2 A.-. 31 -1.401-1< < ')1 a'Ao • A Aa Z1ID C to r2NPCm H 'Ims 2.1 �v)
.4 7C1 rn 2 C D A 2i a • 2 9.'D • 2-4 m 2'a 2 D 2,Cn i)•' 1 m.r a.r r A dim N .4 D 2'n N m;m 4. 70 .2
Cr m-.1 c, .r .-.m nim 2 a,• 2 7,.. - G1 2 MO M2.1 -4 -4 MM; m 2 r 2 n m 1312i 1 /10 0 I
N 11(m .. 2: O ?A m a n 0)4-42 (/) D -• ("1 14, C rr,11 m N'A A Air..,) 1'l..0 m 2 a41.0 -4 r 7C 1
to Mtn v) CO < .•.' v) i•! .. 2 a In:2.--4 a v) MI N 2 r 4 A m 2 Z''.4 N n r 0.0 A .Chs C) or a
a(n'm rn J'm ry r m a 2• w Cr 2 2 I u) A: • G)IA A.r-.Ia (n m.. Im .. N C O n V
A 232 a' 4.09'.4-• OO :I 1 3 2'. ;2 '7 2 V -4',m 22 ',en 1 -44,1 ( 2C m
n < O'c 1' r1 C 13!CC• a A G) to fn ... 12•7!-r m ..(n 0'2 r'(n C) i .r 9..a A 2 1 I
I .r in ..' C -1.41 m• 0770 -I 2 -•: Ci m,-r A -4 N .r m i P1 *01 ''1 Q
In n T•m ..3. • OI a O 21a..03 D -. N. A AI(n 2 N 'm n N r Cn ri•1 Z
(n m m.q 2 0 +)f -42;12 -4 2 3 .. :N m .4 tnl 1
(nm :n c C m; O -412 m .4..) -4 I 2 a
Z I -4 . -4-4 J) N. • '
-+.4 01NN I m
)e: -4 HI , O
.nmol I I 1 I
.•
ii I j m
1 . N 1
I•
•
I J i •2
I I j mn
N. N I I
.-. N N '.0 u I I... - W W A I
N': V a O T(A:C1 r W - o-'; •r m I N. N 70
•, • • • v • • • • • : • ! I • m '
N'a' a' N a 0.....400 0• N T ...0,h. N CA I •, m
-4 UI.a.0 (Jr W ,D N 01.4 UI .0 I-' Na a.1 44.0 CA 0.1 N UI! 40 CA .4 UI Ut a 2 r
C• W 0 9 • Ca N CO .O N UI I .0 N r 23 0.0 01'A ,'D(D 1+1 UI O! 0 .0 0 n < !
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • '• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • IS • • • • • -r-I ,
t: N A .) v_:C. Gj L. C.43 u n C D h'W .2143 .:.1'') 0.0 a - CA c204,20 (11000!00000010 J': C.., r-) 0• C f'1
c•0. -0 ,., .-.u c l N ..0 0•,4 u.1 r..' 3 •. ..I .N.., t.9. 0. C .3 UI o a,o(f o1u a ...� .A G 1,a N, u o .3 (J1 D I 1
r Z 2
I I
. H
1
I .
<2 A
D
A m
r
9. .
2
a 0 ,
• m •A
"3
a
. m
.D N W N 0' 0' V)
•' V u a r a V ur•NUI W' 5-'N V N' W a N ' N •-.
r' W UI 0.co N u .7 O N U1.D Co•'I"' U CJI 0... a W 0.O' W UI W 0 Co •
• + • • • • . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • ' • 0 • +
S V ufol L1 NU 0• N W 43..u0JaWN(D N040' '-4 UI.0Cr *Ca00.- 4(3aaJDA) N' (a V A
C10 O co CJ 0 O• : h• 9 a a G ..J.4 UI(4.43 0 c1(fl - . UI:O J(400 O0000V 43.N 4.0; O .) m
-'4 .3J c,043 0., a a 000007()NO 000' a 043 000 670000000 O .4• ._) .1 <
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • , • • • m
O 13 a 0 C:00 C1: C7 000.1 c7 C).000'000.000.0 U, O 0.'000000,0 Cl J O O L310 O! 00.0 ,3 7•
30.-3 :> -r 0 J.1': 0 O O n 0 u O.V O uI•a 0 a 00,-10 O! O0'10 0.),00 0:0 O 0.- 'D O:O OI JO O C' c
• m
11
' I
: 1
•
N h' r N' n) a
1• x N h• r u 9.I WI N a. a
9'r a u, .2 z 0 W W U1 r W 4 N I :a r N a a' W.0 W W A
• • • • • • 1 • • • • • • •
01 .4 0 CT ,/l O V r J) .4(A C. as N -41 1+W'N N h•O(f h.'.0 N.1 N a N 02 ((7! .J1 e.
4: V a r C. 4, r .3 a N.. V s .0 01 a N V O.0 UI a 14'43 .I UI JD J N.a N I N a -4 (n
..1 -, ...20 ,1
SUI .1 1 4.. N Ll 90• U1 .D N a h.0% N O a h•9 a O N LA O 0,30 N' N C7
• • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • -40 0
,--.4'n004,-,,2C-, 0 UI OrJ .7O Cf D h1 W 0O UC) O .4O V •1 0400064.1.0,==4:00 ,== .O J043 .13 C T
.( r 7 r5 :.1 )' N 5 '-) '1 r.):) u.44.4 cl e-, c] ') ']N n W a' C1.J"7 O C .4 UI IV;C 0 n O 0 4.0 V A 0 1 -' a
r0
V
n I
u
T h' N a W I
LA a N N V u N a W. r.O h.' 0 N (D r• D
1.) 0, .'01 N W 1. Cl N r a N h. (3 h• r N r a. 0 '7 4 ) •'
• • • • I • • • • • • <
.-J) .1 W UI JI UI r 0 0 C-, N TNN m UI CA a 1V .0 r•N N 0• N.0 a h'N N N+0 u O c n
.D N a 'D 4'1 n 0. 0 40 C)01(r v D) .1(A C) a a UI•D e0 a N..4 h. .0 a N.O O N a N (D OD .4. 7 .4 a
,n .A'Co a ) C- N N -.40 0 r o N,') ' _,N 0. 01,4.-.0 [21.. 0 .300,..a ... 4.4
- , -a c.) 0 .
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a
'0.0 a 07 A 0 O ,1 a .Cl 011 -, 0 r T Q• 1.. ..., .) . ... a ,..1 ..I c).' 1% U1 U1 S A a A 'J 0 c C),.J .3 (333 43 ' Z 3
1 (A , u % ,.. . .A ..7 .2 •... JV W CO -, 4 ,, .4 03 .W .0 .-)n .. . W Ul N ^ ) %c. ) .7 W ) n .1 W n a
1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I II I I I I 1 I in G)
h. u r h• N r.4 4.. In
W .4 a A V 0 CO (JI .O h-W.4 N 1• en-� ,ru01 V VN .0 .4 a '-1 .O'D W u
41 N .0 A '-+. cJ .-- C4 W LA mo .N T V .D T •". .3CD Ut h•D •. a.JI uN W V .O
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A
";r., L-', LA LA -2 V C. 0uu.1 .O F ca 22 02 0• a 970. .. a a - Q• u •a. h' n
H 1 p'
�_
I
i •
• '.4.4 4 (A 4 4 411-4 4 4.'4 4 CALLA u .( 4(A(454 CA CA(A .A 4.4 LA 4.4 4 4:4(A /1 r I
• 'O,•17 J :0 t0 J 0.D V V TL.1U1U1 -1 J1 ca U1 Ul:Ln 01 0 N 0 NU1 J• 'J.UI L11UI,UI JI DC .O
• all J1J14NN.-'.• 04•+TO'O 0 J 1..44,44 U-N N N'N N N I-•..P....r A2 co
• 7,r , s -) 11, O r r .J,-41 N•-• JI O 4 N .-- .) V 0+ a,4 N m 27 V(111 0 4 0,2 r .
. O
.) S:-+ '1 9 -. n .-.-. .a 1 A A 11.VI a JI.s n 11:11 2 .7 A -,1 ✓)i 3 C JI (,) t 0I L N C C)
-• .4:2 fa m'2 IO2'2 '1 D J O.+.0 C m'A .-..-.'O .+ ( J .+ A"r 11 2 -1-+CII >? 2 ...) '-
' 2 rnitoT 'nCrr1,1.rA'C CtIi -.i A CA7)Ir(n 22 Ar'rn m O Zm Dia r 1'- --4 I
M (1• C 2,DmC''m P'332rAI2'•. N.-, mf1'7Am n..!'11Cl OtmP7C'V f'1 \ < '
A 11 2DI- N A-. A -4 .4• ;Z N O O O • 0f•1 z • m . Pro O
r'A O 2'.-. O 1.tn 2 .7•< .,(n 2 m Z r. N 021 OiMr-121 -4 -< I O ('10% 0
A r'r N m C 11 AIN m 11- 1221312,4 2 G D T 12 N N 11133 C .1 Z A r1 OM '1
(�1 7.7 2'. <11 0 Cl A 0161 0 -4 1 2 r'11 O r-. 12 • 1 3,A A AIfI n2 '
. 'm < 7;.. 7. 1oA 0000' 2.4 xr .mr .3O701C -•0m021.E s ACM 0 I
IC 1•) MIX 33•+71 2 A 110c :7rlr- NA A i 11N.N 44 2z.2 1,1 7C►. < - 'am!oA r,0. 2 ,
7 O.Cn 1.C. --.0 A 2 : 1 74 I'S 77 C)rnN 7, (n(n m .2 11 Tito 7
io C cI'1 =In- 9 I (n m r ,m r'1 O • 0
..I(n T1 I1 9 )...• '1 . I m I•
2 A D A
. CI r .. n JC . (n -4 r 24
I'1 CIO,,4 p'A Cl. o• 7 ijN O 1 V -Ti 233 r,N :O -1 < •. J
-• N I 2 ZS'19rrlI 9rClIOO N:0 f1 NI yt(n.-.43 rrlmA < 1)1D O 'T 13
. 10 IN CCN A 31 A..r-012 r 1 1 m 11r. m I'O 21= 2 mi.. 2C ' ' r
'1 ''I'1 C 11 0''11 2,2 2141 0•N LA 012 A A r mit 7 A r1I I 2 '.m
7 -4 A f1 92' is In rn :.) 2!m G i►.A 11 .C7 0
,r 1 N A. m 11 0 ) OCIN .. IPI 0 2 10
'(n r m r/1. 7(I ' 01 r' MI A 'm n1 -1 .2
m <
' 2 -r ml I m '.n N A 'O
211 < N1 N r
'm2 III I N IC � i
,a 1 • mI �m N i 1
'..40 I m I j i 1
I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1m
. 1-0
+
I I i i I .•
I ;72
I j C
I
i m
•
1 A
ii C
A
r0 0 N' .O 33'N 1 P. 4 N I 'MJ 0.1 I I '. A A
+ • •I • • • • • • I• •j m i
w .2 01 0 ON. I r•+1.•i, OP. 'MJ .aI A N
0 0+ •41 0 0+.9 i0-0 41 •+010 0' VI0 o r 0 2 It
a• N UI O .4,1%) i01 O 0. r(1514 .4 VIN
• • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ,• • • • • • • 11 I
O a 4j._)C.. v J J.-,i0 .J (2.03 O J1:'- V 0',O CJ OIC'. ' L71.(O trj0.7 O;0 O OIC 4 C m
0 .4 V,'J 7 C).7 J ,....,.J
,'.J 7 4 0•21(3 A. CI.U.7 010 J C.4 0 0'00 '-'O O J!0 LA L.
1 i II I r 2
i O C
2m•
•
I I
I i 1 cS A
A Cl
M
• y 9
1
3
A O
I m I
A2
9
n
• Cl
r O r N
N 0 .- Y• .O N r. h+• 1
4 J N' -0 .O .0'0 N O r LII' 4 4 O •
• • * • - • • • 0 • • • 5
0 .O O. 0+ 0 N r 0 O CO 4 N 0'O 4 N ''O ON 01 0 N'J J A
D CJ O UI, 7 O .�•0 O O O.O '.3.C....U O aJ m U V UI'- O m
1.• 0 J 0 0 J 0. O0 J.0 040 O O O 0000:00 <
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • rn
C G 0.0 0 O'o O O.O O CI.42 O O CI O.72'..J 0 a)cal C) J '2 O Ji C1 O 0 O Ci J') O 7 i
0 0 0j 0 0::.]O OI0 :7 O O O 0I0 7 .):0 0 0 0 0 71 L: O 4.JI J C J C7 f: 0:n C C
I
•
m
p NI I •
A
•
N V r O r- r
N Cr, NI 9 •..., J) u U1 O N 4 ON! .-• 4.. r- A
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
N N N O .( N O 0 AUl1+ al-4 V -4N N• N (A Q+ n
0. 0+ N y D r L. P.N 4 4 0+.O..0 P. .0'.4 0 N 0 4'.0 0+ Is -. (n
Ni 4 N 2 N .04 40 V 0 V V.U1 N ..• 0 .D =% O 34 •0O 0
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • '• • • • • • • 1 0 0
4 0 O+J 0 N O 0.7 (7 0 (.. 0+ m-7 V a 0 0 0 0''2 O O 'O 9 0%O o 0 0 J C1 0 m C "1
•,- 9 4.0 7 r .3 .-2 O ' 0 0 NI 0 -3.'(3 ..C C) J .3 :-. n 4 J o:-- O r- 0 0 0 .3 ,- A
I ; 1 r- 0
v
A I
1„- ("
-4 I--
41 4 N r-.. 1
.•- . 4 N A N .0
1 4 r U1 0+.. N N ..
• • • • • • C
N 0+ V. 0:0 G N 14 N 4 N 0+N 4 U1 ,11 Pro 4A N N O+ v D
.- 4 V 0 Cr, 0000 1-•V4S0+.O .O o r 017. 1% .001...... 0 x
, CC) 0+ V. y) .. A•-1,(II 43 '4 N V s V ..In c, 0 r-'Cl' .4-.. (T .J V^) 0 -.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A
0. +O 4.0 P O.J .J N 0 0 0+ LA m O'O UI U J G.7.0 O''. +O 0 T J O J O 0 O-3 J) Z 7
,O N V . 0' O . .•, .7 )N 9.10..740 .1 :7 .20 ... •> 4.(3 O - .J - ,2 -2C. ..7 c C1 A
I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 m 7
P. r r r 1
4 O 0, .- 0 O :J.O r 0+ UI ►- N 0 P 4 r 4 0
J) N 0 .O 4 <7 N `) V 41, J 0% S 1.---.0u400
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • 9
.. .•- JIB 4. V.UI 4 N .O -) 0+ O 0. UI -+'0 4 N CO 'J A .
-I N
--- -
-_- ) l 1 a i J .--3-7--J--7-7-.4 - _- ) --A a
.0 • ♦•O 0 r• 00 0 0-0 0 5 0'0 a• 0 0 0 0 o 0 ''J 0 0.0 Al. 0'0 0 0 0 •• 00.0 000000 0 11
W • :d.w w 5 w:44444 • NJ,N N M3-MJ N N Na N N N N h),MD N N N N NI N • r a-.' r r r.r 1� DC .-1
4 • N•N N * r r r r'... .. is. NIJI U1 0'0 0 0 0 W W.w W u.N N N rJ N N..• • Ui.111.31 0 0.0 w(4 - .J n z 2
.,- • ,)r ) • T 01 0 .A) r - • 4,r ..1 0 ;w N r.., ) .0 .(:N.. 7 .l 0 u N r :3 • ,V y..,.3 N r•J N .'3"J ..1 ,) ] r
-4 'n 72:-4 , "0 r 'J M SI➢.r N 0,0 In.r.0 rn 71)3 C n<2 m 0•n n 2 n :),-, 2 C Cl2 2 2 2 n (n10 N C n
.0 0 mm0 A 11 -4r2C .1 C C-1..n'2ms'01011r0,2Dr02m11 '1' 2010 ,1m.'Im D,< D ....
D Z r'r(n n 0.2. D .c C) 0 2 Ulla :1 m .7 1s-•la ... Z'-t i'7 CID T .-1.1 P 2;T 0 rn 21D 7 7 a < r'm r .. ;r
< Z •..111 'T D•PI2....-. D 2 -41.4 2. Cr(llor '!'.•, T..Irmr,C13ml... r,l 3)C;r0(A.DmDj737. '. < ,
I C C''0 D 1M r'73 2 2:r r r T In n 2 1 • • .n• 2 r 1 2 b.. 21n C) T ZI1 •..-.i d).Ai-• D O I
r .7 M:30 (n mi .. nl.4T O C n.. C (n r" 34 -4 ...., n s•m z' r 1112 0 J 0.411..v P1 7 0
r. 070M; Om X10 "217.2M1.10 m 012020 :021. < Ul'mA t .4 2 11Drl D' 02I 22 2m1CP1 Nm 12
m n .12 i-a .4'73 0 731 Cl N 7010 -4.4; D 6111 N t1 v DI0 N G) C r IU/ r' -c01000 n (nlm•n n2
A ID 11 0 r' 0 I)1 73 11 3 '.4 m r(n'3 2.'+ O C 1 ('I .1 (n,C 3I I m AI A •1 N
2 :1 0: 2 ..,)1 2I.. < 11. •.1=..O D r 3173 m -I'D'-1 Lir 9 V r C0 in M (lin -i 11' i i-ri '1 .4 A I
' m i.ti m D 2• 012.4 • 21-•1'a r'•-.2 st.1 C m.. VI 'rn (n mit m. 7m,......., M ,cc mu. D
2 4, A' C N; I• n 173 6111... 20-411. 3,2 ••• 10 r 73' Mir. a r Li' A n, D Tir r -4,- 0
Cl) 2 <' N NI m PI 102 .2-4 M1- 2 -i 'C m U1,A r",.. < 2119 19 a' -4D1C.r •-a O
in N -. 401
'I Pi (IN N 12 I. G) D'• AIV) D DC1. A wIA 11• ►.It9 -a n . 1 Al O T 0
•
CI m m'A 21m D -4. 041 ..Di ') In(n 11 r ink') n O"II- .41-1-4 2C ('1
M, '73 Mar GIA .-/ 311'3 01 2•••1s 73 MI 0:C Cl)I P 3 2'2 '..... 7 ,'1
< OP* ..'C J ! D731. r) -02I1ZI DMZ. C'9 1 to '0 N'(t -•132 .7
n
;rti I n•.. Cl) -4 rtit. Jl • 173.•AA IN .., 1 • C;C ..1m 11
M 1.1.M min 11 0.P1 • m 73.0111 T'.. 731A • Al
N 11(0 0,11 A C'2 I •• 2 •'IN t'n 0,011
n 'n •-•0,.. 7 A m s 2',2
• I s s Cl •i 2'2 nln
•
r r J •A -r'1 • mlm
I , 'n 113 2 Cl)
; I i a
I i I I I v '
i . n
r
•
•
••
IA)
I I n
• M
1 I I I I I I A
2 n
r1 r x
r UI I 41C0 : 73
P. r !A ''0 i O 9 r rI it UI N ''4r r 01 !CJI 4;.1 Oi I+T , 1.0
• • I a • • • • • . • • •, • I • • • • ,• • Cl
v P. v 0 t r 3 4 w C -410 Ni0 N 1.3 10 O NIN 21 'iN 2'01 T!r W 11
.1 +4 0 r 0 v 0 r -.D W W (9 1-.1N 00.020 (ClOD C01 r •3' 10 00 ....o...0 0,7.!
v .0 0' w n OD 4 D .4 o W O v:2 0'v 0•+1.0 D 0 410 31 IUI '0'0 0...1-. 0 n 2
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • '•.• • • • • • 1• • • • • . ,,• • i • • :• • • • • • 1• • -4 -(
.0 n T 'D' .0 0 .?J O c.:., r•- O o c +/ G .4 ,3►•"A .'--.' '4 r 0+1 0 e'G:'0 r Oi0 0' ...( 431 1) 0'w`J J107 0 C O
.4 N •' -D O N O'72 O 'D,•] .4 T -.C-, N L.O 1:119 0 .0'01.0 Maim 'a 0.0-4 4:9 w, O 61)!(.. ))0 Cl a Ni.( ] D
, r 3 N
3 -'1
•
711 C:
•
I -.I ,73
<= m
•
0
•
,
a !A
2
• n f1
. m
v
•
. 0
Cl• a)
1
•• •
r
• a
r r N 01 1 ' 0 4 0 r N r' (1 4: 4' 0'0 .-4.0' 0-..ran 71
2 v W 4 UI N420:0) 0 40 l•.I.Ul 01'r r -4-4 r O'.) O oD,N r UI x 4 0 0 4• 0,4 T 0 2 N.N 0 A
• • • • • • + • • • 0
O -4 -4 0 d O ma.N N .0 -4 O Ca N O (3 O J U1 U:0 v 1+UI 0 UI:UI N UI'T 01 0,J .2 0 0 .3''d :11 '0
m .:. •L,o .• N o O s o 9 n •Ut 'D n G O'O 0 N 0 .a v.0 O o.0 O T (r .0' 0.4 O W W (n a tiC A
0 0 0 •0 O O U 0,173 o 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 C2:1.2 O U I,O O 0110 0 0 0 0 011D O 0,0 Na c*Ln 00(4 ..
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • I• • • • • • • • • • .• • • • • • • • IS
C]n •7 r, •) O O C]. U O C O O 0.c. ..3 Cl!n 000 O c2163 0 0'0 O C),c3 J O 010 O r]'O']J r].:a -4
., J O Cl .`:] .)'O 0•0'U O C 0,0 a.0'.1 O 01G O L.( 'a Olr3 J O O O Girl J, 0 Jic) O r ..c.O o':4•-• F+
0
2 <
r UI b
'Cl IN N .0 P. N •r'. u, 4• !
• i I N) I 4 TI r i
4 D T Na v ./0 0 N r' r r N 01•W r'.D.O v, 0'v.0 13.01 4, NJ TIUI 33 LD .4;0 t., 73 1
0 • • a • 0 • • • . . . . . • 0 • • • a • • •
'0 UI 0 0 -U1 r T .4 TI N .0 N,.n3 N 0 UI(00 0 2 0•3 CI,2 4.0.0 N!O N, .0 NW .0 a-• 0-v'D D '
' '3 '3 04710 43 -4
.Iou ~ N
0 UOr V T4wv' v T O0v N0V:0 .0vN 'rNw0v'4 AO101 v2 C
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • y O O
U1 0 .-7 N N T O N 11 U1.':7 o r )N U!O w 00'T C 40 40 vS .00 T N 40 CD-r 0 T C 0 OJ r O 0 .-•v C '1
U1 ,O ) P. D Ui :' UI 'C• ],O 1 0 '7 UI r:) ' 4 r.+''0 4 UI T v Ui N W T 4 v r a' - (f c7,0 1.3'v L. r,T .• D
Ir O
a I
LA
_
r
I. .0 N 1
•
'0 N P. P 0 0 •• N N, 4 ►.r r'4 (C' 'O 11 0
0 3 J 0. v 00031 T 0 4 T 40 'w r O D r•••,....P.o.e...P. O N :.' N O v T U1 c7 raw w •-
• C
P. 0 N T 'O - n N r.N iv 4 0.40N UI T.r C)N D 0'r 0' W r 0 N w.m 4 .11 U1 N O3 T N r 01 m s
0 T 4 W n N m r'0'UI9 r .0'T T rn 0UIr T .1 ry m N T v .1 Cr V 0r7 0 0' OC' rJ 2111 F O N 73
al . CI: N T TTN , fr 4 IN ••N 0 N.0(3 .1..1 J)2•'3 0 T t' .0 N.3% ,-4J71/1 W NNm .A .A -3 .. '
• . • • • • • • • ••. . . • • . • • . . • . • • • • • • • • • • . • • • v
0 0 U .1 v w O v UI 0,�% p 3 O v Ul'04 0 UI 4'0 C O N...:C1CI .O 1/1 .4.0 r y 0O. C)UI • • • • • • •% N 9 O 0"D 4 2 ') •
Ul r -. .0 NJ Cl C 0 I 1 .0 _. T r 0 ` . 4 r .0 r- .4 U1 0 .1 111,01 -4 O v 4 .0 0 •D Ui ' ' T "' N)W 0 .0 .0 J n D
I I C 7
r m
0 .0 O N 4 4 UI UI 0 /41"4 O 'D N N W UI O J)4 V Uf T (+AAP :T OD-0 0.0 111 iu, 0'
'D W PA Ln V •.14111 'O ..•W r W CCI.•"0¢. O0 Co(.4.4..•P. Mrs.; ,----I 4A4 N 2.0 0 UI 004
• • • • • • •, • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 11 '
+1 _l N -4 .- O N 01 2 0 N .O 0 (.' 0 N'D 0'c UI T 3 W CC T T •.� 0,v • . 0 J .1.3 CM-43 Ul n
-4 .•
•
• ` .
. - -1
---
. .
4*
4
•
.1.7 17777-37 • 1 1 1 i. A .. .--7--.1-77.- ...--,7.-..--;--:-7".11-1-7 ,------- -1- ----- ",--7- -77" ..._
•
*
JP p 41,4, a JP,J* JP * JP•4) 4* JP•JP • 43 Jo.* JP J. * 4* a a le 4P 4* ., 4* 4* 0 0 . * 4* JD * Vt .-0
ON .* 31 •31 1..1 0.._.1 0 .. A i.o . A A * ..4,-4 4.4 0 10. • (A Ls(0 LA(0 CA CA LA Ca, • <A(... ...- • LA CA s Ys•0: ..g
... . ..•......1-.....3 ,D * 47 .3 N) 1..,... I, .3 „) ,.3 ,„) ,), * .23 33 „2,33 33 ...., .4 -.4 ..4. • i., a, ..r, • 0 LA • Cl Z 3
I-. •. ..41.NJ 0-•2' 33 0 .4.1,2 ..11 0•-• '3 • 0 .0 0 P. 0' I .0 (4 N7.s. 0<A NJ .4--3 4 N.)0-* 0 • 4+ 43 • r1 0 .-,
03
.. •Cl 2•rl rl r1,,) "a 13 it,r1 2 •o.c. rl• 3 70 r'C7 rli C .,1 rn 112 r- 0 f: 2 01! ... < -0•D"P 'Ti 2C" -0 C
2 I. -4•3. o.0,I 1.r" 3 s..,a r C•12.. 3 rn 0.4 C 0, -4 '3 11 s..C: 0. I. f• f-' 3 :n 9 rn. 13 9 rn 33 2 •., •-• •
.4 '13 1' il 11 MI 71 0 .4 (1),Ti!el 9 7. 21 r', ri.0-1 P121 ...) -11 11 r)$.-. 2 77-I..71' (/) -r Cl 70, -• .4 m t• -44-' ..4
P1 ,... :n AA A.,AA...0 (A e1:ren 9:AA 111 ..; 2 Cl GI 111 r 04 1: r. 0 37 Cl C:C1. C AA '7• . 2E 2 0 4: ' .0
. :4 !-4 3 7•.i -6.41-I V) 43 ("11 fl o,n.-• . ! ..-. r..)2 rnt .-, PI en 0.4 0 • 33 37...II 0 (-) . •-• -4 r• ;In . 0
rn 1Js .7s A A.0• 2 r". Z 3 LO 2 CI! 30 21 -4 0 rn 21.0 33 0: A 13: A r' 3411 7, v-I r- Cl 0
•
v) ;r- .-,•1-.r-r'r- r-. -1--4 7./ r)i .1 .4•rn rn! .4 C rn.z i n 0.0. r".)-0. z rn if : 2 2 2 , V)In :2
2 1 1 1 04 73 Ss.0(1 ,... 2' Cl) CO 2! 1'1 0-4 Cl 2 0 2 u,• rl. CI 1-' 0 CI el ' r4 2
A 110('1 1;0 0 2; 0 C.00 01 rn -44, c O. 0 11 0 -.4. ... 2• 0.4. :1 A 2-I .4 11 i'Il 41
-11 i 2•11 0 •-4 .3 A fn!o -4 0 r- 0; * #.. . 211 1 C ,93. 0• 3.-41 33.4 34 .0.rI 04 X/ Z
IP 1.-• 0 111 C<,2 -.I .V 0,0 0 101 43 'II 2. 0 41)1 34 ('1.-. .2 '1 r- (A tel .41 Cl•-•21 : ri .0 •0 4/ '
.4 vo l'1.1"1 ll: I,r, c!3 01 0, In "11• .7) 1 2 1.1 l'11Z 0• j 0 71 • ' X) •.2 1.1 !I --. it ii 19 r90132!-00 ' 0.2 Orn 4. ! Z 2 A A. 9 --6 2 2 -4 l''' 14 CII .1 r'4(4 0
11 M 31.1 z.4. r1 af ,,4 29 2 I .4)r .... rn rn -4,1* ...... ..4 2.61 13 2 .311 .11
2 •a m m ell -4 C. I 0'4e 01 11 rn 211)' 2 9 2 0.,r 0 2 13 Z 31 33 "a 2 C Cl
,..4 '4 AZ f, r'
2 , C f. 33•-• 0 f -4• -4 r) -1 in -4 43 C -4 • -4 0 1 0 0 C 2 rn
VI .Z .1 0 -4 MI 7* .:. I ia.n XI <a .-. 2 a 2 3: C1 I-.201 0 OM 0 ,
!o! V/ C 0; 'n .. 12 rn (0 I 00i re' -1 33 2, 2 CO MI C CLI .
i.4 44 • 01 .41 111(II 2. 01 0 f).rn (A C 1., ri CI.4 I
L/7 13 , 0 (443 r 2 (-)' • .33 2 I -4 '4(11
2 , • (41
LI . , '
, • 1. 01! 2411 '0.4 !
2
• .
• r- (Ai .
i
i -• .
, • : . rn . 0
, , !
. 1 .
• I 2
1 .
II
• 37
. .
, C1
•
. .
1 •
0
, .
....4 1
• ;
I
'AI 1
•
•
• I-4
• '
• •
. .
•
C ,
, .
pi
I „
I . •
• 9 ,
1 . ,,
_. ,
0-0 . as i NI 4...... NI 04
I0 ..•Sj
•
•
41 • , VI • • o ! o 4 • • • • 1'.1 I
174 41 2 011 UI .•.• 1 na 01 (30.01 N3 0.4 .0',.• s.13 -.01 4/P :LA 421 0 a, ,11 -4 Cl
.4.0) LE 0 CA! r 21 a, (A mpl (A 0 0.4• 33 so k):(....! 0 0 0! .0 02 0 L4•1 N.) f4 .3 43 3. 2 1
CO LE ON)01 (A NJ A 0 • C31 CD NJ at! 0.. cp(2 '3 s-. LA 0' CO .0 C3 MI OD 7,IN4 .-4 el 2
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 . • • • • 6 • '4 • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • 111 _4 .4
•- 0 *: 04 LE 9 ') .0 •JO .9,•-, C. C. 0 Cei 0 0.3 0 N. 0.. 0 0(4 03 .0 .3 0.4 LAI 10.7 0 0 NI cr. Cl 04 .0 C C7
4 3 "' 0 a, ',. .3 •-• r' 0.0'3 * -0 0 -41 ,-)0 3 0 01: 0 .0 0-0.•-) :3.3.0 NJ 0 1 r..) 0 Cl N.11 -4 L. .0 :0 3.
,
I ;1 1 , r- 3 .4
,
i . .
. ! .
: 0 -.
.
.
. .
. , .
. ' . 2 C
. •
. • ;
•
. .
. • -i x3
• .
. .
. , 1
. .
I i
I .
. 1 < 2 in
A.,
. . .13
1 . .4
,
'
. . ' • 0 X3
, •I
2
. .
el rn
. • ! rn
. !
2
. '
0 •
,0
C) 2
-4
-4
, •
. •
A;
5-0 1... .
, "7
NJ t3LA 1 • 04
,J ha 1 .. 1.4 04 "0
0 o•-• ON NJ. 04;• 33 AI •
.
r3 A 0 0 CO .0 4-. 0-0 0.00 CA- I-. • UI 0; 0.0 0 LA .4, 17,I-,2 .0' 0 I').3 2 ..0 28 XI 12
• • • • • • • • • • • 4 o ••• • 4 .4- • • ' • 4. • • ' • • o o 4 • o .4 0
CI 0 4.cf, c., LA 0' 0 LA 53 04, 0.4 ftj 2 Ni 43 53*0 LAIL4 A 43, (.01 4, -4 4-4 LA L0 c. LA 40 ;-] .0
ID LA LE Cl: 0 C3• .0,Z <3 0,, UI .4 0 nJ a' 0 C3 C.7 C7...7 C3 0 ,3 c3, 0 ,...LA c,. /1,J Ln ...4 33 70
0 ::-/ CD.i 0' 0, CD! 00 CD Ni 000 UI(./11 0 0000 00001 0 000 LE 021 (U .4
• • • • • • • • • , • . 540 • • • • • • ! • • • • • • • • • • • 4 • • • • • • 3.
l..
C7 .3 ,...1 cj C. .) ,3 t3 1 5.3 0 0 0, CI ,3 GI 53 01 0 3 C3 Cl.r* CD C3 C3 43 C31 CJ ,3 C3 rl, r- 0 4.7 cn -4
„) .3 ,, t 7") 1 CD 43 43C3 .3.-.3 :72 O. CD C*0 C3 CD; CD :3 43 C712 c.) CI C3 CD 01 C4 -D CD CI! (3 43 C ,CI s-•
43
• • ' 1 :
• i . , . i I I
• •
• i I
1 Cl
, . i
•
. • i ;
: , 1
. .
. •
I . ! ! I • , >
A NJ 0-0
. '3 ** 1 4.• 04. ,
• 04
04 0 NJ .0.3• 0 (A *.A 4101 , 1: .4 oil ca NJ 4-. A I 2. CO CA! 0. h.' ON 49 toll X
• 0 000, • 4 • '
. * 1 ! .4 • t • o . . l • • • 1 . . , 4 .• •• ••
03 Ik.) 43 ('3 Isa IV ...11 0' C.1 (A p..•: ,,. 00 /31 iv 4-'.3 .0(3! CA 94-I 33 C3 .4■.: Ln (,.■• ,0 1.
,-..1 ... 0 0- 4i 44 04 1,* ,.• po • (04, 112 31{A Co •-•' IA CT 01 4-12 V.) 01 NY O.) 0 0,141 11. 0 CLI L.4 T. -4 (I)
-1 ....4 .2 0' c■NJ (4 .4 (X. NI 431 S.0 0 0 A .0 .0 rl NO -4 NI .0 LAI 43 n>03 1,4, LA 0- .0 *7 Cl
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • : • • • • ' • • • • -'40 0
LA C., (J1 LA(1' Un 577" 0 .0 C5 0 c3 C, 0' CD -7 CD 04 UI LA .-- 03 X 0 :3 LA CD CM .0 0+ ■-(A a), NJ , 0 Ln C '11
3 ,,.... , 1 ,...Cl LI • ;.:* LE•r-., rn ,/ •-.3 4- 0 0 1.-• '' 14 u.) CrS '71 3 0- <3'0 N.)! (a NJ a!).4• (II ,..1 3' t17 7*
, I (" CI
• 1 • . -4
1. I
; .
• (..4
-4 04
• I•
LA 4- 0 4, . LA 0.' CA 0. ,.' h. h. 71 JO
(A 0" r..).-.. 0) 0. lo 0. O) I•-•1... 4-01 ... .4 I..CO' 0"43 04' Xi (92 .4 NJ .-'5-' 0 ,
• • • • • .• 04 • 4• •• 00 • o 41 4 . 441 • ..• ••• • • • . . . .0
Al 1) JP 4n.4 A.) 1.n en OZ A-5fi CD 43 4., (4 NJ 13 rJ .4 1.2 0 Cl NJ 0 ON 0 LA 19 P.0)0. .0 1.4 c. .4 la
•Z11, ON 0 LA n; A 4' .4 0 -.c. '3 kJ: N.)03 N7 0 (J1: s..• (.4 LA 58•47 Cl LE (.4-4; ell 4... A r) C. Ln Ln 0 73
ra 1-.c4 C.1 rs.)(.• N3 kn• 33 13 .) LE• al ..13 •' L4 -, 1! 0..el 0 1.4 ...)...L, .0' 0 NJ 0-•....: ..0 ub C. 0.- 0.4
• 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .• • • • • • • • • • ' • • • • Th
'7 0' ,3 LA .0(4 0' C LA 4,-3 c2 C*.7 (A: 0 .3 0....0, 0 2....P.,a -3 A cl CA 0, 37 .4 0,04 .4 0 L0 A 2 17
' 0 • ;.•21 :.$1 Ul. A-- ( Li,,, ,5.3 13
43
-) 7 ..)04 0 0 .0 0-0 A 03 C-0 0 0 h.9. ..4 Na P.1(9• 131 ..A. 0 r) f.
I f I I I Cl 0
A) ,-., AA r,
.3 in S..4+4• 0 r2 0' 1 a, N.)s. (90 .0 ON LE(3)2 A 0 1J) U1 (..4 33 .0 •
.I r2 Ul 0 0 ' ' '• .0 0' NJ 0'NJ NJ('J. ,il 5) LA 1, 43 a' Co CA NJ ..c, -4 us 0" ..3 -4 Lc
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0
n4 .4 V. ON JP. 4* ----:- •• -4.cD -,0•3 1 CP CO ON,1) '•- 0 U•1 I-' LA (A 0'01 .41 Sr ..I r) .
-4 f‘..)
. ; • . .
. ,
. . , ; ; •
. .
' • . •
:;_,L.; - .; -: :: ... 3 '-'.! ''. 'f, ...! ''. • -: : -: •-, •• : ' ! ; 1 !.:8 ."3 '. t ! --, it -.: 11 '..1'.: : 't .!!, -: 2 -i - 1 `', 1 -, ..! '.., '._ ; , , , ,.., _ , , - , • • . - - , ..,.
-1
g i 411)
---- , -- ' -I . _ - . , _ . -; j =_ , -_ _ _ , - ; , —.-., .
•� P Pa a as a 71 .•
•. J •a ..1.1J a .a v 0 a
•• J JD 70 5 0 N r f•i Z
•: r hJ w ' ti r 7 1 7 .•
71 r1 ti U) A 3'.A 17 C
-• O a n m n, l "1 Z -,
jTI 2 arm -a12 17 -•.• -•
m! -4 m m C 771,-. Z -. 1
I :0 • GI. 2 21-1 O
I • N a 2 n n,-4 2 ,w ) .O
rnI :, -t I)2,0 /`i N 4,1 'i
jxl ''1 .D 012 2 C1 2
1 Ti 2 x N1r1 -1 73 PI L]I C. 11 a (n I P1 L '_
I i 2 7'. 1 mj -• ii O D
O tii •111.1 . .-. J
-1 -4 0'r•. Z J 71 tI
I 1 i O C 2310 N 2 C 1`1
-I .'7•; (.) 71 >I! •'1
1 j j > r'fI AI '1 J
r NI 1'1,0 a
rte. V)im rn
j I r.,-F1
r1I
j i i j i i i i io
1
I13 .
jI 'o
I I I i 1la
1 iA
040
0
Z el
33
1 I Ni iix
I I I 0 41 N A
a 9
I IA
• •I I • r1 j
r. .1 .vs Oil N 'm
I I NI NI T r a a s Z I
a aI ''.O.a PI a A '2
j l • I • • • • • • • -•H
v 0.1 '7 ago U1 O)ic. ... C 0
1 i I 4-' .GI 1, o a ':1 utIn is D 1
r Z ►•
I I z C
7
1 i < 2 In
73
, 0 73
j I
a ri
m
12
1
v ,
I a a
y
-4
N
• D
✓ ,.., I- 13
N .a UI W
(.1 O. .J .• LA 7J
• • • O
a a G T' UI V
;n -n 'b a C Z
✓ r r a'1 a
• • • • • • • • .• • a
4 C: •
a: •, ao C) c.. 7 -•
` 1.
O a a O OIC 0 ..
j 2
•
O D
' Ut :.-0, N r•' u A
a a' V 'UI r T, Ui I.
.• m a+ a.a,w.D' c. a -1 ,n
• • • • • • • • • r O G
-4 N, VI a a CO a a C '1
.aI .0 ,r_ a J. 7 :: q
C
✓
D 1
N L.
• I- 1-4
-40
u a a n
a3 U1 7) N 4-
4
• <
C' .a IS L1 r A
OS •a ' .• umw a 73
II. N)' r iM:_ CM..
, • • • • • • • n
N .1. a c-,a 07 a'•0 • Z NO
MI 1 1 "1 J
r•. 1
_xi N •I
I-. U1 J• UI 3
• • • • • Z
y (4
11 k
MEMO TO : Members of the Ad Hoc Cable Communications Committee
and, the City Council
FROM: Jeanne Andre , Administrative Assistant
RE : Videotape on Community Programming
DATE : August 6 , 1981
Bill Nee , Mayor of the City of Fridley, has produced an
excellant videotape on community programming (local origination
and local access) available on the Fridley cable system. Attorney
Adrian Herbst has secured this videotape for viewing in Shakopee .
I have arranged for the library to show this film to interested
persons by reservation during its regular hours .
I recommend that all Cable Committee and City Council members
view this videotape at their convenience . In addition the Commu-
nity-at-large will be notified of the availability of this tape .
JA/jam
(2?Y
MEMO TO: John Anderson
City Administrator
FROM: Don Steger
City Planner
RE: Action by the Planning Commission and the Board of Adjustment
and Appeals on Variances and Conditional Use Permits
DATE: August 14, 1981
Board of Adjustment & Appeals:
1. John Rademacher request for a 2' 6" rear yard variance and a 3' 6"
side yard variance to allow the placement of a garage at 140 W. 3rd
Avenue was approved.
2. John Bergstad's request for a 2' 4" rear yard variance in order for the
Senior Citizen Highrise to comply with City Code was reluctantly approved.
Planning Commission:
1. Marcia Armstrong's request for a Conditional Use Permit to operate
a professional office in her home at 1043 So. Main was approved subject
to review in one year and that any change in the business as proposed
would require a new Conditional Use Permit. Her home occupation is the
practice of kinlein.
2. Sharon Fenske's request for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a dance
studio as a home occupation at 642 Adams was approved subject to
review after six months in operation and that any changes in the operation
of the dance studio as proposed would require a new Conditional Use Permit.
3. Jerome & John Hennen's request for a Conditional Use Permit to operate
a fuel/service station at 807 E. 1st Avenue (B-1) , was approved w/conditions.
Should you have any questions on any of the above Planning matters, please let
me know.
jiw
MEMO TO: Barb Menden
FROM: Gregg Vox.land, Finance Director
RE: Sewer Billing
DATE: August 12, 1981
Resolution No. 1832 adopting sewer rates for 6/1/81 and the changed method
of billing residential accounts is intended to be implemented as follows:
Residential: Individually metered houses, townhouses and/or duplexes
and triplexes. Does not include apartments with water supplied
through "house" meter.
Water consumption base for 1981 is Winter quarter water use, for
1982 and thereafter it is the 2 quarters of fall and winter. The
sewer rate is applied to the monthly average of the base.
The dollar amount derived is what is billed monthly to the account
with the water meter until a new base or rate is established.
Residential accounts that have sewer but not water or a new owner
takes over should be billed $5.00 per month (estimated average
residential bill) . New owners bill changes then with new base.
Commercial & Industrial: includes apartment houses
Each account that has a water meter (excluding accounts/business
with sewer flow meter and/or water meter for water that does not
enter sewer system) is to receive a sewer bill quarterly based on
water consumption of the preceeding quarter. (i.e. 7/1/81 bill based
on 3/15 to 6/15 water meter readings.) For apartment houses,
normally water is supplied through a "house" meter. Therefore,
the individual apartments have no water meter and are not billed
sewer. The house account has the meter and is billed quarterly based
on water used like a normal commercial business.
Commercial and industrial accounts billed as such prior to 6/1/81
continue to be billed in the same manner as before but with
the new rate.
/ctpfENAi:v CITY OF SHAKOPEE • .24
♦,;-..,„,1-„;,..
, 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
1 ,
V .-.r 1r!0‘-
MEMO
TO: _ John Anderson
FROM:Jim Karkanen, Public Works Dept.
SUBJECT: Weed control
DATE:_ Aug. 13 , 1981
The weed inspector has completed his 1st round weed notices with
complete compliance. This past week he has started sending notices to
various property owners for the 2nd round because of fast growing weeds.
(Examples. .Eagle Bluff 2nd Addt. , Eastview Addt. and Minn. Valley Addt. )
The property owner is sent a 10 day notice with a price per hour list from
our weed cutting contractor. (Examples included) The weed contractor bills
the property owner directly. The City uses their own forces to mow R/W' s
and public land. Normally, two cutting per season are sufficient for a
normal growing season, however , this season will require a third cutting
because of the early spring growing season this year.
A list of 1st round cutting is included.
Regarding your request of which lots were cut at Eastview Addt. the
1st round; All of the lots were cut and billed to Wm. Chard as per his
instructions on the 1st round. One property owner (Ed Hennen) has already
requested a cutting on his 6 lots this week. This cutting operation was
begun on Aug. 12th. We' re_ waiting for a reply from Mr. Chard on the other
lots at this time.
8/14/81 -- Wm Chard has just instructed us to mow the Eastview Aidt.
The weed contractor has been notified, and he should start on it this
weekend.
TENTATIVE AGENDA
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
ADJ.REG. SESSION AUGUST 18 , 1981
Acting Mayor Reinke presiding
1 ] Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M.
2 ] Approval of Minutes of July 21st and July 28th, 1981
3 ] Communications :
a] Notice of Public Meeting on A Draft Plan for Housing and
Related Services for Older Persons in the Twin Cities Metro Area
b] NSP Wholesale Rate Increase - Lou has indicated that SPUC
would be following this closely
c ] Metro Council re : Sludge-Ash Landfill Siting Program
d ] Carl J. Vierling request to hook-tip to City water
4 ] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers
5 ) RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS
6 ] Old Business :
a ] 7 : 30 P.M. - Block #57 Assessment Agreement
b] Fuller Street Storm Sewer Lateral Feasibility Study (Blk 57)
c ] 8:00 P.M. Continuation of Public Hearing - Request for Proposals
to Provide Cable Communications Services to the City of
Shakopee
a) Continuation of public hearing
b] Staff report on additional background information
c] Presentation by Consultant Anita Benda
d] Additional comments by public and Council
e ] Adopt Request for Proposals OR continue public hearing
f ] Close public hearing
BRING ORDINANCE AND REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
d ] 9:00 P.M. - Continuation of public hearing on the proposed
assessments for the 81-1 VIP Sanitary Sewer Interceptor -
Res . No. 1891 , Adopting Assessments
e ] 81-2 Bluff Avenue assessment on Joseph J. Kopp Estate
f] Resolution No. 1897 , Awarding Contract for 81-2 Bluff Avenue
Watermain and Sanitary Sewer
g ] Report on recording agreement between the City and Milwaukee
Railroad ditch maintenance agreement
7 ] Planning Commission Recommendations :
a] Preliminary and Final Plat Approval of Nor-Dean 1st Add 'n. ,
lot split for an existing duplex located at 1522-1528 10th
Avenue West (PC 81-23P)
Developer: r-Dean. Enterprises , 14095 Quebec Ave . So. , Savage.
55378
Planning Comm- Recommendation: Approval w/conditions
Action: Approve preliminary plat and adopt Res . No. 1895
. -
TENTATIVE AGENDA
August 18 , 1981
Page -2-
b ] Preliminary and Final Plat Approval of Nor-Dean 2nd Add 'n. ,
lot split for an existing duplex located at 1064-1076 Sibley
(PC 81-24P)
Developer: Nor-Dean Enterprises
Planning Comm. Recommendation: Approval w/conditions
Action: Approve preliminary plat and adopt Res . No. 1896
8 ] Routine Resolutions and Ordinances :
a] Ordinance No. 71 , Amending the City Code by increasing the bond
requirementsfor on and off sale liquor licenses
b ] Ordinance No. 72 , Amending the City Code to provide for the
filing of a bond and bringing structure up to code within
six months after it is moved in
c ] Res. No. 1894, Declaring the cost to be assessed and setting
a public hearing onLassessments (Holmes St . storm assess-
ment appeals)
d ] Ordinance No. 73 , Proposed Park Ordinance
9 ] New Business :
a ] 8: 30 P.M. - Application for On Sale and Sunday Intoxicating
Liquor Licenses - Iowa Falls , Inc . , 1.01 East 1st Avenue
b ] Family Dining Inc . (1 & 44 Off Sale )
c] 80-11 TH 101 Trunk Watermain Assessment Method
d] 80-4 CR-16 Utilities Improvement - Change Order (to be provided
on Monday)
e ] Maintenance of W 4th Avenue from Adams to Harrison
f ] Noise Survey Report from the League
g] Quotation of Pending Assessments for 80-3 San. Sewer Service
Lines , Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Holmes Street Reconstruction
h ] 1980 Official. Audit Statement
i ] Letter of Recommendations from Jerome Jaspers & Company
j ] Authorize payment of the bills
10] Consent Business :
a] Authorize purchase of one radio control unit
11 ] Other Business :
a] Air Conditioner on West Side of City Hall
b] Finance Department Operations
c ] Amendment to City & Hockey Lease Agreement
d ] Discussion of Public Works Labor Negotiations
e ]
f ]
g]
12 ] Adjourn to Tuesday, August 25 , 1981 , at 7 : 30 P.M.
John K. Anderson
City Administrator
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
ON
A DRAFT PLAN FOR HOUSING AND RELATED SERVICES
FOR OLDER PERSONS IN THE
TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA RECEIVED
THURSDAY, AUGUST 27, 1981 AUG 1 1 1981
9:00 A.M.
CITY OFMe r.opo.P.c tan Counc e Chamber � � �"���
300 MetAo Square Bldg.
7th and Robert Stz.
St. Pau e, Minnu oCa 55101
A joint Housing/Health/Aging Task Force of the Metropolitan- Council
will hold a public meeting for agencies and individuals to comment
on a draft plan for housing and related services needed and
preferred by older persons in the Twin Cities Area. The task force
consists of members from the Council ' s Metropolitan Housing and
Redevelopment Authority Committee, Metropolitan Health Board and
Advisory Committee on Aging. The draft plan is the result of a
two-year study by the task force of housing and related service needs
of the Area' s older population.
The plan describes the needs and preferences of older persons for
a variety of housing and service arrangements , including living
independently in single-family homes to living in planned housing
developments for the elderly, and living in nursing homes. The plan
includes policies for developing additional housing and services and
recommendations for their organization, provision, distribution and
funding.
The plan has two parts :
1. A policy plan that includes recommendations on a range of
housing alternatives and related supportive services.
(See Summary on other side of page. )
2. Recommendations on the location and provision of these housing
and services for each of the Area' s seven counties .
To obtain a copy of either or both of these parts , call the Council' s
Aging Program at 291-6445 or 291-6304.
If you wish to comment on the draft plan at the public meeting, call
the Aging Program at 291-6445 or 291-6304 to be placed on the agenda.
Written comments on the draft plan are also welcome. Send before
September 1, 1981 and address them to:
Dick Flesher, Chairman
Housing/Health/Aging Task Force
Metropolitan Council
(See above address. )
SUMMARY OF PLAN
The joint Housing/Health/Aging Task Force of the Metropolitan
Council has prepared a document entitled "Draft Plan for
Housing and Service Arrangements Needed and Preferred by
Older Persons in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. "
The draft plan recognizes that finding and maintaining
suitable housing are problems for a large proportion of the
older population. Declining health, decreased mobility,
financial limitations and changes in social and family
relationships are the most frequent causes of housing problems
among older persons.
The draft plan defines housing and services broadly to include
all environments in which an older person can live and have
basic needs met, and the services, such as home delivered
meals, needed in order to support an older person in his/her
housing environment.
The policies and recommendations in the plan are based upon
findings from face-to-face interviews with 600 randomly
selected people 60 years of age or older living in noninsti-
tutional settings throughout the Metropolitan Area.
The plan lists desirable characteristics of a housing and
service system for the Area' s older people. These character-
istics include: an adequate supply of housing and services
to provide maximum choice of type and location; support for
the "informal network" of family, friends and neighbors who
provide most of the assistance needed by older persons; and
maximum use of existing resources to promote cost effectiveness.
Recommendations are included on six types of housing
alternatives: 1) owned housing alternatives; 2) rental
housing that serves all ages; 3) rental housing that serves
only older persons; 4) shared housing; 5) nursing homes; and
6) "campus settings" where several types of housing are
grouped together.
The plan also includes recommendations on both informal and
formal services including home nursing care, home health aide
and homemaker service, chore and home maintenance, home-
delivered meals, adult day care, telephone reassurance/
friendly visiting service, and housing assistance and
counseling.
The plan recommends a housing and services funding strategy
that combines funding of agencies and organizations with
payment tied to individual older persons, as well as greater
participation in payment for services by the older person.
• 3
4t0iwr
iJ
Northern States Power Company
414 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401
Telephone(612)330-5500
August 3, 1981
RECEIVED
City of Shakopee AUG 4 1981
129 East 1st Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
CITY OF SHAKO EE
Dear Sir or Ms:
Enclosed is a copy of the Northern States Power Company (Minnesota) Wholesale
Rate Schedule and a revenue comparison at the existing and proposed rate
levels for your City. This filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission proposes an increase of $4,840,506 or 23.3% on the basis of a
January 1, 1982 to December 31, 1982 test year. The increase amount for
the actual year 1980 billing data is also included on the revenue
comparison schedule.
The existing rates were approved by the FERC on February 9, 1979. The
proposed effective date for this rate increase is October 2, 1981.
If you have any questions or comments on the filing, please contact me.
Very truly yours,
- '
Richard J. -•- s
Assistant to the Vice President
Commercial Operations
Northern States Power Company
414 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
Enclosure
- l l f
T EEN STATES PCXR (XM'ANY ( A) Sheet No: 1
EIECTRIC RATE BOOK Revision: Original
WHCFiESAIE Cancelling: 9th Revised Sch. A
1st Revised Sch. A-1
WHOLESALE FIRM POWER SERVICE
Service: This schedule provides for the sale of Firm Power Service by NSP to
municipalities.
Service Conditions: NSP shall provide all the municipality's power and energy
requirements which will be delivered hereunder at one of the following
voltages:
a. Primary Distribution Voltage. The Company will provide transformation
facilities for a single point of delivery at City's primary distribution
voltage.
b. Transmission Voltage. The City must provide all transformation facilities
to distribution voltage of not less than 69 kV.
Rate:
Customer Charge per Month $116.00
Demand Charge per Month
Production and Transmission Demand Charge -
Current month on-peak period demand - per kW $ 4.60
Distribution Substation Demand Change -
Per kW of maximum measured demand during the
current or preceding 11 months $ .44
Energy Charge per Month
All on-peak kWh - per kWh 2.680¢
All off-peak kWh - per kWh 2.019¢
Rate Code
Primary Distribution Transmission
Non-Associated
Municipality Utility
Customer and On-Peak Usage PA114 PB114 PA124
Off-Peak Usage PA115 PB115 PA125
Issued: 8-3-81 By: R. B. Berglund, Effective: 10-2-81
V. P. Qnercial Operations
FERC Rate Schedule No: 368 city of: Shakopee Rate Schedule: PA114
3 -0--
NORrFERNT STATES PCNKR OCMPANY (KaatsorA) Sheet No: 2
ELECTRIC RATE BOOK Revision: Original
WHOLESALE Cancelling: 9th Revised Sch. A
1st Revised Sch. A-1
WHOLESALE FIRM POWER SERVICE (continued)
Monthly Minimum Charge: The customer charge plus the distribution substation
demand charge.
Late Payment Charge: The above rate plus 4% is applicable upon bills not paid
within 30 days from the date bill is rendered.
Definition of Peak Periods: The on-peak period is defined as those hours
between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. Monday through Friday, except the following
holidays: New Year's Lay, Good Friday, Memorial Day, Independence Day,
Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. When a designated holiday
occurs on Saturday, the preceding Friday will be designated a holiday. When
a designated holiday occurs on Sunday, the following Monday will be designated
a holiday. The off-peak period is defined as all other hours. Definition of
on-peak and off-peak period is subject to change with change in Conpany's
system operating characteristics.
Determination of Production and Transmission Demand: The measured 15-minute
maximum demand in kilowatts within the current billing month which occurs
during any on-peak hours.
Determination of Distribution Substation Demand: The maximum 15-minute measured
demand in kilowatts occurring anytime during the current or preceding 11
months.
Power Factor Provision: The City shall be required to maintain an hourly power
factor of not less than 98% lagging during the eight hours of City's daily
heavy load period and shall also be required to prevent a leading hourly power
factor during the eight hours of City's daily light load period. To the
extent that the power factor is not maintained as set forth above City shall
pay the Cbnpany a facilities fee based upon the Cbrmpany's cost of installing
an equivalent amount of switched capacitors or reactors.
Issued: 8-3-81 By: R. B. Berglund, Effective: 10-2-81
V. P. Cbmoercial Operations
FERC Rate Schedule No: 368 City of: Shakopcc Tate Schedule: PA114
NST STATES POWER COMPANY (MINNESOTA) Sheet No: 3
ELECTRIC RATE BOOK Revision: Original
WHOLESALE Cancelling: 9th Revised Sch. A
1st Revised Sch. A-1
WHOLESALE FIRM POWER SERVICE (continued)
Fuel Clause: There shall be added to or deducted frau the net monthly bill a
amount per kilowatt-hour equal to the product of the increase above or
decrease belga .894¢ in the fuel cost per kilowatt-hour sales and the loss
factor of .964 rounded to the nearest .001¢.
The fuel cost shall be the sum of the following for the most recent two-month
period:
a. The fossil and nuclear fuel consumed in the Company's generating stations
as recorded in Accounts 151 and 518.
b. The net energy cost of energy purchases as recorded in Account 555
exclusive of capacity or demand charges, when such energy is purchased on
an economic dispatch basis.
c. The actual identifiable fossil and nuclear fuel costs associated with
energy purchased for reasons other than identified in (b) above, less
d. The fuel-related costs recovered through intersystem sales.
The kilowatt-hour sales shall be all kilowatt-hours sold excluding intersystem
sales for the same period.
Fixed Rate Contract Provision: Nothing contained herein shall be construed as
affecting in any way the right of the party furnishing service under this rate
schedule to unilaterally make application to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission for a change in rates under Section 205 of the Federal Power Act
and pursuant to the Commission's Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder.
Issued: 8-3-81 By: R. H. Berglund, Effective: 10-2-81
V. P. Qzmercial Operations
FERC Fate Schedule No: 368 City of: Shakopee Rate Schedule: PA114
a Z
W Z r C N O N O M N N N.O J 4
a W • • • • . • • • • • • • •
U 01111N...N0 .0JM M
4-.
W C NN N N N N N N N N N N N
,-1 N W
Qa
M I C C •rm11mNNr .Omm N
Ul 0 Y Wo
- •r r P P.-�It1 ,O aC If1 r O` .O O
�0QaOC 1 1 ZZ rP .rrtfl .t .rr m --,0N 4
RSW W O 1 .ON r 11 U• .OU.m 04r I ..= • . • • • • • • • • • • lb
•
C. Otl14. 0O .0ONm O rt1v.t NON mrN . 4 'C r
L . mw IOW • • • • • • • • • • / • Z m m m t+v m m m m m m m m .r
4,0 H 0 Zn 4 r .O.O .0 .OU11 JIr rrr Q 1
O LL I P P P P P P P P P P P P
Cks7C] W e J7 ( 4 .040M-40 -4007M m
ZO PPPP PP000000 .! Q2 I MmQ C P r .OmN-• P
Mw NNN N NN..+--r.r-r M •-W m t' NN.01 .0 -r.O .O II' .D
I Z C I 4 4 1 1 4 4 m M M M m M 4 0> 1 • • • • 0 0 ► w • • . •
►. O I • • • • • • • • • a • • • I-W N C U. C' ' m N 'O J N-+ r
I XN 1111 J .1. UNC I1
U. U' .U1 m C mmr .01f.r - OPP
•DNP
4 ‹ r r.r..1.r.y .r N N..r04t.� .4 1.4
IXW I .r .
F 1 N
_ -Iw I I I I I I I I 1
N Y C N-•✓ 1111 POC.4•INMJ P OC .0m04O-+.0 m000m •0
LL -- I W f4m me[ .O ' - O .0 m0 .0 P < Z NN W U\ N-rr NP .-.NN -r
0- I J Nr4mr .Omma11m m WI U•N •O NO' ONOP ZN 0
Q 0 I J • • • • • J> I
C 2 -+OOPOMIt'. S 'f PON m WW1 .OS JM -+ Jd .+ m
C Y m .-.4ti r ..+.... ....... 4 Dm I .-/
o 2- .3 .4 W LL I
LU W W
V1 O n I..
o Io I
dZW N^'rd1�1POm .-ry1m1 Pa > W I m-+Pm .QLt� MPNNm.D r
C I OC mmmm .O .O ..• O .Om0 .0 P OMI Nm1Pm0Mr- .04P -. r
CO Nr4mr .OMMW 44M M C CZ I MNP'+ OMPNrCMU.O ..
M I $ /) • ► . lb • • • • • • • . • W W • . . • . ► • . ► • • . St
I I Q •+COcr. 0mI111 PON M z > I •o0or ' mr oz,omm .,
C 1 W ..I.r.4 r.r.r.r.y .4 r 1 WWm N N.. O•.4 M m..1 - .+ r
+. N
C Z .r O C I 4
LL
W ...
Q
1-. N W
C Om .ONP U• m .ONmrr00 0
O I Y 000000C' 00000 O O ZZ r ...0 ..1 .0N .00 PmCr 1
l < 000000000000 O ‹ W Or mmcc, N ..,tr 04✓ tr.40 .-.
0 I LLI WU.m NN J P NC .••../ PN m d Z > ► w ♦ • •
2• I n • • • • Oh a. . •• •• •• •• •• W W CO U. 4 ...U1 P N N u, 0 1 m CC
I •
P r .00 1 1mm.0U C - O Cm 0I(111100 .0NNNU tr .0 m
J I LL Nrm1.- 04 . 11r .0P 4 I'-
_J I w 1NP0 .0m JC0rP -d r C
0 ogowooloso . • a • Cr
m 2 m m N m N N M M M N N M .0 0. W LU
m r0 000000000000 0
Z
CC. 000000000000 0
W Q • I , • . • • • • 1 • • •
Y W V12 .O .O .O .O .D .D .O .D .D N
YOOC 00000001'10 O OU
Q 000000000000 0 U
Cr
W 00' N N N 4.r N N 111 r 1!. 0
m 0006. 4. 0000000 0 04
I mNO .OmONNLt' Ot 0, N
Z 0 0 4 0 .0 0 -+ m .0 0 0'P .0 r Z
C NM NOP ...U• I1.0 N 4.4M N JW tP M. .0 CU1MCCP WPr.r .0
• a • a • • Q0 r•00CCNNCOOm U1 Cr
N N N N .r N N N N N N N r W I- 2 N CMJ 4 N m C N U 1 U• N N
N ow • • • • • • • • a ►
0- > OJ .r .ONN .0PmOmL1 0
> W 044 mN .rr .O .OMMU m
C r
Ql W -+
P •
•CC .ONN 111( .0 U•m U` 1r -1 W I
W W C OU. JU10 .00-+.O -+Nm C 0 1 10-r•.N0, P OP 0 .00 .0
0 > N • • • • • • • • . • • • < 21 1 0 1 U\ 1 m .0 P m N W 1 Cr
> Q C.)L., r •0 .0 .0 .O U. J . U.rrr WI O1 ON1CU•NOm1 .•+ C
MQ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .........aJ > • • . • . • • • • .
C LL I W W NmN'C O.wr -.O mU' N .O
N a
1 W DC .-i.r .r-+ .w.r .4•N N-4.r•- C
w I LL I --11- F
[[[��W]]] �C�
C. I O N.-+r 1t1• POm -+U'• M1 P I 'a
yJ 1 W mmCm .0 .0 -+0 .0m0 .0 P I W N- CC' •Om NNO•+ .OM M
��m1 1- J Nr1 Cr 0mmC er JM m I C OZ JrmrCrrrr NPN to
Q z •• �! a . . . . . • . . . . . • I OZ .r m .011PrU. U'. 4
U: _ •- -+OOPOMCJJPON m I C W . w . • . • • • w w
���777 N Y fU 4"I..+-.. . .. .. -rr .1.1 1 r Z W CCNr •O rC CO r r rC N
1 N .Cr .11 C 0 W C P
C� d o I z
a1 ya
220
LL C 4 =1.L.1 N-r1 ' POm.-+' m1 P u:
C . . . mmm C .O .D-4+0 .OmO •C P
I W W'•+ O „4 .„ „ . ...„ 4 ,wM N W PPN.+r.-rN NJM 1 m r
OXV1 . • . . • • . . • • . CO :P :.0 U. .DP =CNN C' O
v O Q QQ -rCOPOml1•11 PON M W 2Z NCUIP OICI :U. .rCm1 CO
'(+y!-�2 Q I 2 4
.r CLU
C Z > NP CLL- omr .GPmmr •
,O
fi
U O I w W 11. 1 J 1 11. .0 r .O .0 1 .t U. .0
RL n C n .o
�{ C7
w .2.. I 000000000000
0
S I J I 00000000000 0
! nfll J J= 1 m 1N11 .D 04O.ONC CO C I 000000000000 O
•- Q . . . . . • . • • . . • W W 000000000000 O
Pim 1- Z I N C N -0 N m .0 O N U' U. 1 .0 Z U • • • • • • • • • •
� C C I MMNNNtl. rM -tiNU 'C I!` CC 0 u, U. U• U. U'. U. U, U•U1 U' UN O
7 F- Y I P .ON.-• •OP P .0r0.-411 P 4- C P CP CP P 1
( ��M4J� I . . . . • . 0600 . • NS .r
U• U.U\ U` 1 1 11.t2'' m U' U W m 0 U •
-{Q >4 .O U r
f
U Gro
C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J C 000000000000 J
> C C C m m C m C C m C m Q > C C C Q m C C m m m m C Q
"� \ \..\\ \-. . ..... .4 \ H
ZiW Q .rNM111• .ONCP .C,•.�� O ^'Nm JU. .Or m PO�.�
F
.J
5 r-
ZI -I.11nPPMN •ON *JD m40 0
W • • • • • r • • • • r r •
U M4140.-IN .-4...404:14M M
WW I N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N 1 OW
0 Qal
W j a I JIn 1 r+ P -4N 001+ .0 .4 r
1/ U� I NMOCPJNOO1111. N1fn N
� � .. w . 1 2Z .0mN mr► PP P1JMN
0 W W O 000000,000000 ,....7 • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• 0 = I- 000000000000 1 0 •OUnP mP1 P M.0.0 .014- .0
0
• • • • • • • • • • • • z M M N N N M M d M M T M N
o ff 4J 0 244 000000000000 Q 1
Z1-1 C p U- P P P P P P P P P P P P
.1 4J•(7 d
.04) 0+J v W
W �g �p�ro 0OmMPPNmd9. 0 M
W SO 000000000000 0 42 j NOOMU� NM D �mTd•+ I�
7W 40404)400 P Ln NNNNN M 1.Wfl -+S d O4nNhY"+P 4 U+0 P
1 M M MIn
u1M NP m T MMMM .4 O> • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I r4 7 • ► • • • ► • a • w • • 0 F"W 1 Cr m tf. J •O P N J•'n m P N
IX(/' .4...4.4NNu1f`nN1� N d 1 P
11 Q Q ti I .... . . NNN.4-41
1 Z W .4
Z N
I
in Y C 1 000000000000 0 07 POJ .10 .0 NIMNNOM 00
wI W I 40N PNOP U1r- m ONun 0 QZ Z .•4M.01t1TO ? Nmm1-1 40
- _ J r P:N.ONP NM.0 min m m
Q 0 1 J 1 • • • • • • • • a _I> • • • . • • • • • • • w
W Z .-dO0NNN0N00' -4 m 1 WW 41.nIAN*M1�M.rN4 M
QYm ...4 .... .....4 .. -4 J I 7C
o y4 .4 I W LL
W WW H
NO O a 0
0 IZW 000000000000 0 4 y W .4.4.4N.4Inm41`NJh 4
0 10W .ON PNOPInNNONln 0 07 401MIna ..ONMNN 0
K I 7 VS uY P..0 N Cr m M 40 m In CO CO rY CZ NOmr- NNm401NNN .4
0_ I1 N a • • • • ► w • • • • • ► I WW • • • • • • • • • • • •
14 -.000' NMN.00' .r m 1 Z > .01.OIn40 .MNmN1m .0
yJ .4.. .4.4.4-4,.4 .4..4 1 W W MTO0nNdunNNNN ..4
0 I X r 0 K
V.
W n4
Q
N N W
4 I O7 NmOmc04. 0.-4MtnN P.-
0
O I Y 000000000000 0 I 0 ZZ .O 0 N M m f m J N N M u n P
Q 000000000000 0 I <W Nr- -0,.4 dm IPM N .O -4 0
V• W N M m 0` m TM.41n 4C N •C m M Z > • • . . • • ► ► ► • • •
Z O. • • • ► • • • • • • • • • I WW m M 0 1 .4 In P N 1 N O N -4
P. I mP ONNM M ..PUn00 M O OW N mmin .C •0 .0
,J ILL 1MO NIn 4CNw4 .400 N r-
...1
-. It 4 M.O 40 u'•M .. N m C-
p . • • . • • • • • • • • • I rY
m I M T N N N m M M M N M M N C w W
M I Z0 000000000000 0
S 0a 000000000000 0
(
M Q • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Y W N = I 40.0 .0 .0 40 .0 •O 4C.O 40 •O.0 N
2[ 000000000000 0 U I 0'
Q 000000000000 0 U I M
W NMN-4NNr- M01 M4 N 7 •
y • • • • • • • •• • • • • J.
I NOPNN •O .ONOdPM .O
Z ••4d 04) S M.4N 40 PN- N Z
p N4PmPM .0ONMNM 0 JW I 40OP .000Inm4rNP0 N
• • • • w WS * . w 4= 1 P It .0 In m .4 In In M In.4.0 In
NN-.-4•. NNMNNNN CO W •-Z I 14C •0 .4NMm .OMPNP� m
W •• w • • • ► • • • w • • •
(N - > I mr. .. 400 .0NM0 '40N m
> W I InJ N..MInmONMdln d
W .. ..... N...4....4 cc
Q1 I •
W •4
•
•.. . I OOCO0000O00O '1W 1
ri ww0 I 000000000000 P OM ! 1PP NS 700.0ON` .0 ti
• • • • • • • • • • • • Q W I •O P O m O Q S N M m d P N
Q U U I 000000000000 > 1 1 m P P . • . . • • • • •
,4 G. 4 I P P P P P P P P P P P P i J> r
W WW1 mM2on r% �1J •� •
N I W W m I .4.0 .4 .4 N N N.4.4 N 0
W N
0- 1 1-
W
-
r(n�] .44 a 1 01 000000000000
0 I 4
W ^ W .ONPNOP U,N N' ONI1'•
0 1 W Mln.. .0.40NN -4N m .0 N
Ls�C ►. 1 J In lnh •ONP mM.0001n m m I C y7 N'0 PInMm .ONOTIn 1+
Mw . • • • • • • • • • • a 1 C�2 -4 "4 P m P In 0 M 1 - •0 1n
Ll W = ►J. OPmNN In N .0 P•4.4 m MW • • w • • • • • • • ►
frt
I
rDi r0� C .. 4 N Y m ....r .4.4.. ...4 r .. ..4 I N ZW N'm .O .O.ON P PNNNN' P
.7 • a o I 2 w z
L% y� 2 Z O U,
fk C 47 W 000000000000 0
E
= SC .O NPNOPMN' CNU1
Mu1N •ONPCC M .O . C
•
m V1 W 1 .41 N'01T•4NOmM M
1 W w....7
OXN w . • 00 u` InNmMOOn- 401.- 400 N
Q QQ -4OC mNNMN •OP •' -4 N' W 22 N41t0N9NNIn InUn^' P
`-' O N 1 r W ,-.-1 .r.4 r.r.4 r .. d I 4 W • • • • • • • • Or • • • a
4 I r - ..4 1 C f > M Cr U. O•CO M0NIn en un -4
C I W W In 1111n .ON m r` ./.un In P
I0. 0a .0
.Z.. 0OOOO000O000 0
3 c�J i 000000000000 0
0 0 0 0 C 1 000000000000
WW1 COO000000000 0
J
rC _ J21 000000000000
113I 000000 01
C
1 M11MN-. 0NNCLON 0
I r7IC • • • • • • •
nuNUnunnunon •O
HY Pm0.OLnNn .ON1n P I 1-a1 PPPPPPPPPP 4
� • Qcon ' n 021
II IrJJJ� U ` I w� & I V
.4
4 )! il a: N N N N N N N N N N N N J KNNNNNNNNNNNN J
y mmmmmar mmmmmm 4 \ OG opmmmmmmmmmm �
ar\O �NM11n .Or- mPO -.N 0 O ..NMJIn .ON ar' P.4.4.4
I..4 4 O
PiTLII
AG4] E G4 M ... .4 I- F
3
BRUDER & GENTILE
1201 CONNECTICUT AVENUE,N.W.
SUITE 708
OEOROE P.BRUDER WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
JAMES E.HICEEY,JR.
CARMEN L.OENTILE
ALBERT R. SIMONDS,JR. (202) 452-1985 HOWARD E.WAHRENHROCE
J. MICHEL MARCOUX OP COUNSEL
August 3 , 1981
The Honorable Kenneth F. Plumb
Secretary
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
825 North Capitol Street, N. E.
Washington, D. C . 20426
Dear Mr . Plumb:
Submitted herewith on behalf of Northern States Power
Company (Minnesota) ("the Company" ) are six copies of a rate
filing increasing wholesale revenues by $4 ,840 ,506 , or
23 .3% , in Period II, which is calendar year 1982 . The
Company requests that the filing be permitted to become
effective on October 2 , 1981.
The 26 affected wholesale customers and the FERC
designations of the contracts under which they are served
are shown in an attachment hereto. 1/ Each contract
contains an attached rate schedule and provides that such
schedule may be superseded from time to time by appropriate
filings with the Commission. By this filing, made under
those provisions of the contracts , the following two new
rate schedules are substituted for the existing rate
schedules :
(1) Wholesale Firm Power Service
(Serving Primary Distribution and Transmission
Voltages, Cancelling Existing Schedules A and
A-1) .
1/
Twenty-four of the 26 affected customers are located in
Minnesota; one, Sioux Falls , is in South Dakota; and
one , Hillsboro, is in North Dakota. Twenty-five are
municipal electric utilities and one , Home Light and
Power Company serving Jasper, Minnesota, is an
investor-owned utility.
The Honorable Kenneth F. Plumb
August 3 , 1981
Page Two
(2) Wholesale Load Pattern Power Service
(Serving Primary Distribution and Transmission
Voltages , Cancelling Existing Schedules A and
A-1) .
The list of customers attached hereto indicates which of the
above new rate schedules applies to each customer and
whether the customer is served at distribution or
transmission voltage. For the convenience of the
Commission, three copies of each of the superseding
individual customer rate schedules to be substituted in the
contracts are enclosed.
The Company requests that any suspension of the filing
in this case be limited to one day. The Company ' s present
wholesale rates have been in effect since October 8 , 1978 --
a period of almost three years . The escalation in power
supply costs over that period has severely eroded the
Company ' s earned rate of return on wholesale business. As
the filing made today shows, the existing rates would yield
an overall return of only 6.5% in 1982 if they were to
continue in effect throughout that year. An overall return
of 6 . 5% would produce a return on equity of only 4 . 3% on an
end-of-year 1982 capital structure. For comparison with
those rates of return, the Company' s evidence submitted here
shows that its overall fair rate of return is 11 . 4% and its
fair rate of return on equity is 16 .0%.
A request for a return on equity of 16.0% is itself
decidedly restrained in the light of current and projected
financial circumstances. The result of inflation and the
efforts to combat it is some of the highest interest rates
ever experienced in this country. The prime rate now
exceeds 20%; the short term commercial paper rate exceeds
17% . New utility bonds are being issued at 16% or higher .
_ Government announcements indicate a continued tight money
policy. Against that background of the current cost of
debt, a request for a return of 16% on equity, which is a
higher risk investment than debt investment, is manifestly
reasonable.
The high cost of money does not appear likely to
subside. Massive requirements for capital -- for both
private and governmental uses -- will be experienced in the
years ahead. Capital formation is becoming, if anything,
more difficult. Indications from the government are that
3 ..ems
The Honorable Kenneth F. Plumb
August 3 , 1981
( Page Three
tight money policies will be continued. Most major
forecasters are projecting continued double-digit inflation
in 1981, with slight abatement in 1982 . Thus , there is
little reason to hope that the cost of money will slide in
the foreseeable future . There is every reason to believe
that a return on equity of at least 16% will continue to be
required in the foreseeable future.
In preparing this filing the Company has attempted to
conform with Commission-approved cost of service procedures .
It believes that its rates will be considered just and
reasonable under those procedures .
To summarize the basis for the Company's request for
suspension of minimal duration, the Company urges four
separate but inter-related grounds. First, the existing
rates have been in effect for a relatively long period --
during rapidly escalating power supply costs. Second, the
existing rates render an obviously inadequate return on
equity -- 4 .3% -- in the test year. Third, the proposed
return on equity under the superseding rates -- 16 .0% -- is
manifestly reasonable in the light of current and projected
financial circumstances. Fourth, the Company' s proposed
rate increase is based upon Commission-approved cost of
service procedures and is not excessive.
The filing implements changes in the Company ' s recovery
of projected nuclear plant decommissioning costs and spent
nuclear fuel disposal costs. Recovery of both of those
types of projected costs is to be accomplished through an
internal sinking fund procedure , the object of which is to
levelize the accounting and rate impact , insofar as
possible , over the life of the nuclear projects. The
procedure proposed to recover both types of costs
contemplates periodic monitoring of cost-related
developments over the life of the projects and adjustment of
the cost recovery to reflect such developments, along the
lines of the procedure employed in remaining life
depreciation accruals.
In addition to the increase in rate level, the filing
implements time-of-day wholesale rate design. The rate
design employs both an embedded class cost of service study
and a short run marginal cost study. The embedded cost
study identifies various cost components (energy costs and
various categories of other costs) and the short run
marginal cost study separates the energy costs into on-peak
The Honorable Kenneth F. Plumb
August 3 , 1981
Page Four
and off-peak components. The on-peak period is 9 : 00 a.m. to
9 :00 p.m. , Monday through Friday , and the off-peak period is
all other hours of the week and all hours on designated
holidays . Energy rates are designed to reflect differences
in the incremental system energy production costs during the
on-peak and off-peak periods. The on-peak energy charge is
2 .680 per kWh, and the off-peak energy charge is 2 .019 per
kWh. The customer charge is $116 per month and the demand
charge is $4 .60 per kW of the current month on-peak period
demand for transmission voltage deliveries. There is an
additional charge of $0 .44 per kW of maximum measured demand
during the preceding 11 months for distribution voltage
deliveries.
The filing also changes the form of the rate schedules
attached to the service agreements . There currently are
five rate schedules on file with the Commission as
attachments to service agreements, one of which, Schedule J,
is no longer in use since the two customers using the
schedule , the Cities of LeSueur and Kenyon, discontinued
service on December 20 , 1978 and November 15 , 1978 ,
respectively, and converted to standard load pattern power
service at transmission voltage delivery (Schedule A.1) (see
filing in Docket Nos. ER79-56 and ER79-625) . By the present
filing, the Company requests permission to withdraw the
unused Schedule J. The remaining four schedules have been
combined into the two new schedules, by providing a single
schedule for wholesale firm power service (total
requirements service) for both distribution and transmission
voltage deliveries and a single schedule for wholesale load
pattern service (partial requirements service) for both
distribution and transmission voltage deliveries.
No expenses or costs included in the cost of service
statements in Period I or Period II have been alleged or
judged in any administrative or judicial proceeding to be
illegal , duplicative or unnecessary costs that are
demonstrably the product of discriminatory employment
practices.
The Company has no service similar to that covered in
this filing. No specifically assignable facilities have
been or will be installed to provide services under the rate
schedule change.
Included with this filing are the following items :
-19--
The
The Honorable Kenneth F. Plumb
August 3 , 1981
Page Five
(1) A check in the amount of $29 ,202 .53 for •
the filing fee.
(2) The proposed superseding rate schedules
applicable to the individual wholesale contracts .
(3) A list of the wholesale customers and
state commissions to which copies of the rate
schedules and comparative billing data have been
mailed , pursuant to Section 35 . 2 (d) of the
Regulations under the Federal Power Act.
(4 ) A draft of notice of the rate filing for
use of the Commission.
(5) Testimony and exhibits in six volumes in
support of the rate filing together with
accompanying workpapers . Since this is the
Company ' s first filing under the Commission' s
revised filing rules , the cost of service study is
referenced to work papers to aid review. In
addition , the required Statements AA through BL
are referenced to the cost of service study where
applicable .
(6) An attestation of an accounting officer
as to the data used in preparation of the filing.
Northern States requests that all Commission orders and
correspondence, as well as pleadings and correspondence from
others , be served on the following:
George F . Bruder, Esquire *
Bruder & Gentile
1201 Connecticut Avenue, N. W.
Suite 708
Washington , D. C. 20036
David A. Lawrence , Esquire *
Northern States Power Company
-Law Department, Fifth Floor
414 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis , Minnesota 55401
t. * Persons designated for service pursuant to Section
1. 17 (c) , Rules of Practice and Procedure.
The Honorable Kenneth F. Plumb
August 3 , 1981
Page Six
Mr. Roy H. Berglund
Vice President, Commercial Operations
Northern States Power Company
Rate Department, Fourth Floor
414 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis , Minnesota 55401
Any request for copies of the filing should be
addressed to Mr. Lawrence.
V y truly yours ,
Geo ge F. Bruder
Enclosures
cc : Enclosed List
* Person designated for service pursuant to Section
1. 17 (c) , Rules of Practice and Procedure.
LIST OF AFFECTED WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS
AND FERC CONTRACT DESIGNATIONS
The 15 affected firm power total requirements wholesale
customers and their current FERC rate schedule designations
of their contracts are as follows :
Customer FERC Rate Schedule No .
Firm Power Service
Primary Distribution Voltage
Ninth Revised Schedule A
Arlington 378
Brownton 324
Chaska 323
Home Light and Power Company 335
Kasota 318
Kasson 379
Lake City 361
North Saint Paul 371
Saint Peter 325
Shakopee 365
Waseca 380
( Winthrop 364
\ Firm Power Service
Transmission Voltage
First Revised Schedule A-i
Anoka 338
Buffalo 369
Granite Falls 355
The eleven affected load pattern partial requirements
wholesale customers and their current FERC rate schedule
designations of their contracts are as follows:
Customer FERC Rate Schedule No.
Load Pattern Service
Primary Distribution Voltage
Second Revised Schedule A
Sauk Centre 389
C
- 2 - 3g-
! Customer FERC Rate Schedule No.
Load Pattern Service
Transmission Voltage
First Revised Schedule A-1
Ada 385 •
East Grand Forks 387
Fairfax 400
Hillsboro* 314
Kenyon 394
Le Sueur 392
Madelia 397
Melrose 401
Olivia 388
Sioux Falls 386
*
Contract expires without renewal on January 2 , 1982 .
olitao C�
RECEIVED
04
AUG44,4
3 1923. 03% 11111
0.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 1$4
'(N
300 Metro Square Building, 7th Street and Robert Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Area 612, 291-6359
July 31, 1981
TO: People Interested in the Metropolitan Council
Sludge-Ash Landfill Siting Program
The Metropolitan Council staff has completed a draft of a new report
that recommends 10 potential sites for further consideration as
possible disposal sites for sewage sludge and sewage ash disposal.
The 10 sites are located in rural parts of five cf the Area ' s seven
counties. They were selected in connection with a site selection
process that is scheduled to end in early 1983 with designation of
one landfill site for sewage incinerator ash. Under state law, the
Council can site a second "disposal facility" to landspread sludge as
a low-grade fertilizer .
The staff recommendation is based on available data used to rank 31
sites that were previously under consideration, and on a set of
"weighted" environmental and non-environmental criteria adopted by
the Metropolitan Council on July 23 . The staff has also recommended
the elimination from further consideration of 21 of 31 original
possible sites identified in an April Metropolitan Council report.
The 21 sites do not meet the Council' s mandatory environmental
standards , or were ranked low in comparison with the 10 selected
sites when measured against the weighted criteria.
The enclosed material identifies the 10 sites , contains the weighted
criteria, pertinent data from which the Council staff developed its
recommendations, and the resulting ranking of all sites that passed
the mandatory environmental criteria.
The Council will hold two special meetings in September to provide
you with greater opportunity to bring information before the Council
that you feel is pertinent to the sites still under consideration,
and to the landfill siting program.
An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising:
Anoka County 0 Carver County 0 Dakota County 0 Hennepin County 0 Ramsey County 0 Scott County 0 Washington County
The meeting dates and locations are as follows:
- September 10 , 8 p.m. , Coon Rapids High School Auditorium,
2340 Northdale Blvd. , Coon Rapids
- September 21, 8 p.m. , Shakopee High School Auditorium,
10th and Lewis Av. , Shakopee
The 1980 state Waste Management Act (MS 473 .153 .516) , as amended in
1981, directs the Metropolitan Council to select at least one sludge
ash disposal site in the Twin Cities Area. The law also allows the
Council the option of determining if land is needed for sewage sludge
and, if so, to find a suitable site. The site would be owned and
operated by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission.
The purpose of the state law is to find a safe location for the
disposal of sewage incinerator ash waste .
This proposed narrowing of the list of sites under consideration is
far from definitive. The Council will not select the single final
landfill site until February 1983. A number of governmental
actions need to be taken after the two public meetings.
In September , the Council is expected to adopt six candidate sites
plus alternates , and forward the choices to the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency for its determination of the " intrinsic suitability"
of the sites for land disposal after additional soil borings are
taken at each of the six sites . In November , the Environmental
Impact Statements will begin.
The Council encourages you to be in communication with your neighbors
about the contents of this letter and the enclosed material. It is
possible that the Council' s mailing list is not complete. The
Council has a large mailing list of people interested in receiving
mailings about the sludge siting program. Please advise us by fill-
ing out the mailing form which is attached if you wish to continue to
receive sludge-related mailings from the Council. If the form is not
returned, your name will be removed from the list.
Copies of the complete report , entitled Choosing Sewage Sludge
Disposal Sites: Potential "Candidate" Sites. Report No. 4 , are
available at no cost by calling the Council ' s public information
office at 291-6464 .
I would also encourage you to contact us at the above number with any
questions you may have about the siting program, and to participate
in the September public meetings.
Sincerely,
CIAGLe4.4
Charles Weaver
Chairman , Metropolitan Council
Enclosures
-1-
3 G
_T____ _____.__,_______-1
1 ST.FRANCIS( I IBETHEL-.'
cit to
i LIN WOOD
EAST BETHEL 1
CI HURNS OAK GROVE
1.0 \ilk 2 III _--__
1
VO
td ! / �D//T
` ANOKI CO. COLUMHUS L� '/O//Q�
OWit "�.� RAMSEY ANDOVER I HAM LAKE
--11.--14:‘,
FOREST LAKE IG I NEW SCANDIA
HI'srLAKE I /
v>, a�,.t.y- 40 I j
DA7Tom I 'KA
HASSAN LINO LAKES MARINE
CHAMPLIN COON RAPIDS
6415
ON_ /�1iCE NTERVILLE L
1 BLAINE �//4,11t1 _
/ M=r
I I � HUGO
HANOVER 1- -- �"-
LE%ING TON CIRCLE PINES
osSEO ��— _ - / WASHINGTON CO.
GREENFIELDI CORCORAN MAPLE GROVE it p'MOUNDS SHOREVIEW 27/ r '
VIEW-
�Z BROOKLYN PARK NORTH IE 22 I SFIILNATFR
, OCKFORD ( FRIDLEY L. 12 OAKS WI4 TE�EAR
• HENNEPIN CO. I BROOKLYN NEW L K./J// GRANT
1 CENTER (BRIGHTON VADNAIS
2 -,./•44,
j/Zq
����....1111 ii)) H�EIGHTS to
/G1
❑LORETTO C STA I' i ;�13 �ARDENI y/l 2 Q2g Si1L WATER:-'
HILLS- /�,
NEWS 14 1pJ
I INDEPENDENCE MEDINA I PLYMOUTH NOPE 10 I 3 151
•'''' IITTIEIJ ,1- s - 3O,C,,
O1 j CANADA NO7ITH �.
i� G I ROTE VILLE ST.jPA UL �%
MAPLE PLAIN _-1 J L. pp 8�/
GOLDEN CT 2 MAPLEWOOD 1--- 1 LAKE HA.I•HWN /
� '�rr OA KOALE
H vALLE7 16 17 - ELMO --r- '.�//
_ yLONG LA KE( P _
�_ _� oeor/o WAY ArY'L_, L �-.� I RAMSEY CO. d LAKELANO E.
WATERTOWN --- i , L .�5�
t 1 MINNET RISTA f� :y / MINNETONKA ST 1OU15 vN� I r• LAKELANO
�,�I�'ai% /q�-/ 7 ` -�.1 PARK /p SAINT PAUL_ J 21
`fr ��� 4� S LyI � Y/��,MINNEAPOLISi#''%4•5
31
nOIL+HOOD w-'t RfOwN 9 2 J�1 � `'
/' OPKINSa.I P I /
DEEPMAYEN {I 1 (-, .n r �a, I ST.CRO(%BEACH//
{-1_, /14r�j���/P Y L� �1 LI"4
lg I WStT j'l{ wOODBURY • 3 6
^ STBONI/ACID$ .' -�{_-- LDINA -J1 ,•� ;PAUL i E'
AFION
- -- ArER --z-,-^! - • / '�., ~- l8 ISOUrH
NEW GERMANY 4// I RICHFIELD~AIRPORT MENDOIA ter_ 5T NE WIO RT
I
HEIGHTS SUNFISH PAUI
! j"yam'
VICTORS dCHANHASSEN , 't2 _ K li;1
'AML EN I .•.sr ON1 7�lYi ,-KETONN ' EDEN PRAIRIE ,sr,PAUL - .
WACONIA / AR .
1.
111 BLOOMINGTON INVER GROVE
CARVER CO. CNASKA I EAGAN HEIGHTS / COTTAGE GROVE I I.",r.RK
CHASM nr •
MM rouNc I - DAKOTA CO. /
(IA MERICA �'722 L__I SHAKOPEE i /4' ''PTY
NORWOODr� I L�.� CARVER 1-.KSON �j BURNSVILLE j /,.
L� I. 23 CO.OGNEI'T4"1-GREN L-1 3L SAVAGE i//�
TOW,.AM.R.CA I Hi
PRIOR APPLE VALLEY ROSEMOUNT NiNr..,{'
_ LAKES 4 1 HASTINGS I'',
L •HsrlLt II //
LHAMIURG y----J - __L �1G -- I
t T [////� LSC-rOA.TES 1
��----- '.N,RANI stir ,"/ T�
H:NIOCK I 17 I 'V I '....
1 I '.I HMiLLi<iN IRA.I NN,.
L_�--� L � ' LAK EMILIE
SAND...REEK SPRING LAKE I CHf Crif I FMPI Rt I I 1 MARS HnN
Load,rcir
I RIVER I to VE RLM-I LJl10N j
SCOTT CO. ■ARMINGTDN
ST LAWRE NCE( JORDAN L.
I I----_r_— I --L_ I , I�-- -1- ---�- - —
iBELLE PLAINE I -- I
Ni:.K.:.HKEr. I ! 1 IL • cNEW TRIER l
NL-KELEY I et LLE PLAIN 1 HELENA u` 1 I wAMPYON J 1
E CEDAR LAKE EJREKA ��I i RI..'V U
I
i 11 NEW MARKED I ® 1 MIESVILLEI
I i$ - MPTON DOUGLAS
-���L�-�� NEN IRAGUEI - r�"�1. I 15.., ,
ELKO� --I
RANDOLPH
I
j! MILES 5 10 15 20 2yEl m,,,.• .. /
' • _
Irt -J _l
POTENTIAL CANDIDATE SITES
ANOKA County Boundary
ORONO Municipal Boundary
`AM°I N Township Boundary
l
-L-
CRITERIA AND WEIGHTINGS
Relative
I. MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA Weight
A. Surface Water (distances from middle of site)
1. Distance to lakes 94 _•
2. Distance to streams 94
B. Geology
1. Distance to bedrock aquifer .122
2. Groundwater flow away from urbanization 70
II. OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA
A. Slopes: predominantly flat or
predominantly rolling 34
B. Wetlands (as a percentage of site) 75
C. Forested (as a percentage of site) 27
III . MAJOR NON-ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA
A. Agriculture
1. Zoned long-term agricultural (zoned 1 per 40) : 83
2. Prime farmland (Class I and II soil) 108
B. Transportation
1. Distance from nine ton road 11
2. Haul distance 72
IV. • OTHER NON-ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA
A. Distance to development (4 homes per 10 acres) 52
B. Historical/archaeological/critical habitat
(on and adjacent to) 29_
C. Number of property owners 39
D. Public ownership 69
SITES FACT SUMMARY SHEET
SURFACE WATER GEOLOGY SLOPES1 WETLANDS FORESTED AGRICULTURAL
Distance (feet) to Depth (feet) Groundwater Zoned Percent
to bedrock flow away fro long-term prime
Lakes Streams aquifer urbanization Predominantly Percent Percent agriculture farmland
1000-2500 3 300-1000 3 35- 75 3 Yes 1 Plat 1 0- 5 1 0- 8 1 Yes 3 0-40 1
Site 2500-4000 2 1000-2000 2 75-150 2 No 3 Rolling 3 5-10 2 8-16 2 No 1 40-70 2
No. >4000 i >2000 1 >150 1 10 3 16 3 70 3
2 >4000 >2000 140 No Flat 4 21 No 67
3 3800 >2000 >150 No Rolling 0.7 5 - No 52
4 >4000 >2000 >150 Yes Flat 4 22 No 82
5 3800 >2000 55 No Rolling 6 6.5 No 77
9 >4000 >2000 137 No Rolling 0 13 No 73
10 >4000 >2000 >150 No Rolling 0 2 No 66
11 >4000 >2000 70 Yes Rolling 0 4 Yes 75
13 >4000 >2000 105 Yes Flat 0 12 Yes 98
14 >4000 >2000 120 Yes Flat 0 1 No 94
15 >4000 >2000 95 Yes Flat 0 3 No 69
16 >4000 >2000 60 Yes Flat 5.6 6 Yes 78
17 >4000 >2000 >150 Yes Flat 4 23 Yes 45
18 >4000 >2000 >150 Yes Rolling 0 3 Yes 57
19 3400 >2000 >150 Yes Rolling 9 1 Yes 37
22 >4000 1600 >150 Yes Rolling 1 5.5 Yes 36
23 >4000 >2000 >150 Yes Flat 0 11 Yes 73
24 >4000 750 >150 Yes Flat 1 4 The 83
25 >4000 >2000 >150 Yes Flat 2 4.5 Yes 74
26 >4000 >2000 >150 Yes Flat 0 2.5 The 90
27 3500 >2000 >150 Yes Flat 0.7 12 Yes 72
28 >4000 >2000 >150 No Flat 4.5 9.5 Yes 44
29 >4000 >2000 >150 No Rolling 0.7 26.5 Yes 46
30 >4000 >2000 >150 No Rolling 9 12 Yes 76
TRANSPORTATION RESIDENTIAL HISTORICAL OR NUMBER OF PUBLIC TOTAL
DEVELOPMENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR PROPERTY OWNERSHIP POINTS
CRITICAL HABITAT OWNERS
Distance Haul distance
(miles) to (miles) from Distance
nine-ton road source (feet) to On or near Percent
0-1 1 0-20 1 0-3000 3 Yes 3 0-10 1 0- 25 3
Site 1-3 2 20-40 2 >3000 1. No 1 10-20 2 25- 50 2 -
No. 3-5 3 >40 3 >20 3 50-100 1
2 <1 30-40 >3000 No 8 0 1634
3 4 30-40 >3000 No 11 0 1779
4 <1 20-30 0-3000 Yes 15 0 1681
6 <1 0-10 >3000 Yes 7 24 2033
9 1-3 10-20 0-3000 No 16 0 1886
10 <1 10-20 >3000 No 16 0 1493
11 <1 10-20 0-3000 No 7 0 1936
13 <1 20-30 >3000 No 11 0 1780
14 1-3 20-30 0-3000 No 8 0 1684
15 1-3 20-30 >3000 No 8 0 1472
16 1-3 30-40 >3000 No 8 0 1943
17 <1 30-40 >3000 No 21 0 1616
18 1-3 30-40 >3000 No 27 0 1662
19 1-3 >40 >3000 Yes 17 10 1814
22 <1 30-40 >3000 No 18 0 1577
23 <1 30-40 >3000 No 11 0 1658
24 <1 >40 >3000 Yes 9 0 1910
25 4 >40 >3000 No 11 0 1767
26 <1 >40 >3000 No 12 0 1703
27 1-3 >40 >3000 No 13 0 1856 -
28 1-3 30-40 >3000 Yes 16 0 1780
29 <1 30-40 >3000 No 16 0 1785
30 1-3 30-40 >3000 Yes 19 0 2031
Determined by staff during field inspection.
- 4 -
SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF
APPLICATION OF MANDATORY ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA
TO THE 30 POTENTIAL SLUDGE-ASH LANDFILL SITES
Four mancatory environmental criteria were applied to the 30
potential landfill sites to determine whether the sites were
environmentally suitable. These mandatory criteria were:
1. Surface water : the center of the site is more than 1,000
feet from the nearest lake and 300 feet from
the nearest river or stream (does not include
intermittent streams or drainageways) .
2 . Hydrogeology: a. The average depth to bedrock is more
than 35 feet.
b. The site is not directly located within
a buried river valley ( recharge areas to
bedrock aquifers) .
3 . Subsurface soils : the subsoil texture is predominantly
medium to fine ( i .e. , silt, clay, silt
loam, clay loam, silty clay) .
4 . Topography: The site does not have major areas of
excessively steep slopes , such as the Minnesota River Valley.
Any site which did not meet these criteria would be eliminated from
further consideration. Staff found that seven sites , 1, 5 , 7 , 8 , 12 ,
20 ana 21, did not meet all the mandatory environmental criteria.
Site 1 did not meet the criteria for slopes . Approximately two-
thirds of the site has slopes starting at 10 percent , ranging to 15 ,
20 and as steep as 30 percent in points .
Site 2 did not meet the criteria for predominantly medium to fine
subsoil textures . A review of well logs from the Minnesota Geolog-
ical Survey (MGS) reveal subsurface soils to a depth of 50 feet are
an extremely varied mixture of sand , gravel and clay.
Sites 7 , 8 and 12 did not meet the criteria for the average depth to
bedrock . Based upon well logs from the MGS , all sites had averages
less than 35 feet.
Sites 20 and 21 did not meet the criteria for slopes . Both sites are
located on the bluffs of the Minnesota River Valley which render the
construction of a landfill virtually impossible.
-5-
SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF APPLICATION OF DISCRETIONARY CRITERIA
Site
Ranking Points No. Location County
1 1,472 15 Eureka Township Dakota
2 1,493 10 City of Lakeville Dakota
3 1,577 22 Dahlgren Township Carver
4 1,616 17 Sand Creek Township Scott
5 1,634 2 Burns/Oak Grove Township Anoka
6 1,658 23 Benton Township Carver
7 1, 662 18 Helena/Belle Plaine Township Scott
8 1,681 4 Forest Lake Township Washington
9 1,684 14 Eureka Township Dakota
10 1, 703 26 Hollywood Township Carver
11 1,723 3 Burns Township Anoka
12 1,767 25 Camden Township Carver
13 1,780 28 Laketown Township Carver
14 1, 780 13 Castle Rock Township Dakota
15 1, 785 29 City of Minnetrista Hennepin
16 1,814 19 Belle Plaine/Blakely Township Scott
17 1,856 27 Waconia Township Carver
18 1, 886 9 City of Lakeville Dakota _
19 1,910 24 Young America Township Carver
20 1,936 11 Empire Township Dakota
21 1, 943 16 Greenvale Township Dakota
22 2 ,031 29 City of Corcoran Hennepin
23 2 ,033 6 City of Lake Elmo Washington
a1 '• . - / ,
1"
i
, .,e
J„,;,,..._e___ • . ,._ .,t4z. c_e_ty._ a„,.._.0e
,i
a-a e-., - � - i ,
1 0x_!. _ii ° " > i
_____j4ikcj-e-,e_..ep->--k--4e-c,-/e.-- i
.I�'.-u - . / // '
/ / r /„
.._.�i _AN/ ..6.0'_-0,..6.0'_-0, .4, •
,,z -,t 7f o & 0.
kyr ;1,`
e-,- .. - aka
C
3 S--
���oa-yam
hue., Z.-waddle
_
VL I
i
•
• ' i
i
EC F. D a}
AUG 7 :
CITY (Jr K P E 5
• St.Francis Hospital
325 WEST FIFTH AVENUE/SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA 55379/(612)445-2322
August 13, 1981
Mr. John K. Anderson
City Administrator
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear John:
Per your request, the following is the progress we have made
in acquiring properties in Block 57 and steps we are willing
to take to further remedy the parking needs of St. Francis
Hospital .
Significant progress has been made since the hospital last
appreared before the City Council . We have acquired the Pass,
Schultz and Meyer parcels and presently own approximately
one half of Block 57. The Meyer house has been removed; the
Hennen and Moldenhauer homes will be removed by September 1 ;
and the Pass and Schultz houses will be razed very soon.
Also, we know the County has acquired the Jeurissen parcel and
converted it to surface parking. This leaves three unacquired
properties in Block 57 which we understand the County is
actively working toward acquiring.
The Hospital would like and be willing to develop surface park-
ing on our 1 of the block in the very near future. We would
coordinate our development with the City and County to
facilitate the completion of surface parking on the remainder
of the block by the County in the future. The only question
that needs to be answered before we could develop surface
parking is the type of system needed to meet the City's require-
ment to curtail runoff on the block.
John, we hope this meets those things you wanted us to put in
writing. If you need more specifics or need additional
information, please contact us.
Sincerely,
CI:2C
iste=es Otteg
Executive Director
SAO:hme
;PONS 3Y TI FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF ST. PAUL, MN
6a,/
MEMO TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE : Block' #57 Agreement
DATE : August 12 , 1981
Introduction
The revised draft of the proposed Block #57 Assessment Agree-
ment reviewed by City Council on July 21 , 1981, was presented to the
Scott County and St . Francis Hospital approximately two weeks ago .
On August 12 , 1981 , I met with representatives of the County and
Hospital to review the proposed assessment agreement .
Results of the Meeting
Very briefly, the County Board has decided that it is "no
longer interested" in the proposed agreement because they have ex-
panded their present lot to meet present needs and are now nego-
tiating to acquire the remaining three properties on their half of
the block, two of which "are available" . Similarly, the Hospital
is less interested in the proposed agreement because they have,
since April , been able to acquire their half of the block and are
currently clearing the property for parking.
Both parties feel that the objective of City Council to build
a parking lot on Block #57 has been nearly reached and that the
benefits that would have been provided by such an agreement have
been achieved.
Benefits of Agreement Status
Aid in acquisition through condemnation Only 3 lots remain to
be acquired
Force construction of parking The hospital will have
its half cleared for
parking by winter. The
County has already put
in parking on the parcel
it acquired
Preserve the opportunity for future de- Still possible under
velopment to get the property back on County or Hospital own-
the tax rolls ership
Both parties stressed that the progress they have made since April
when the issue was first addressed has been significant . Both also
believe that it was the City Council ' s determination that enabled
them to make the , necessary acquisitions and currently evolving park-
ing lot additions . Both will also work together cooperatively with
the City to select the appropriate drainage plan inthe parking lot .
Block #57 Agreement
August 12 , 1981
Page 2 b
With regard to the specifics of the proposed assessment agree-
ment, the County felt they would need considerably more time to react
to it , but that' there would be resistance to such an agreement . The
Hospital felt that there would have to be work done to preserve some
flexibility of action and/or control by the Hospital before such an
agreement would be acceptable.
Other Considerations
It is clear, as it has been from the beginning, that the City
cannot acquire the total block without the cooperation of the County
because the City cannot condemn county parking lots to build park-
ing lots . This situation will continue as the County successfully
acquires more property for the express purpose of creating parking.
In addition, we are not faced with the legal question of ac-
quiring the recently acquired hospital property to build public
parking when they have already done so and are clearing the property
and putting in parking lots themselves . An attorney ' s
would be needed, but we could find that it is very difficult to
defend acquisition of parking lots for parking lots should the
City be required to accomplished it through condemnation. As with
the County, the longer we wait the more complete their private
parking facilities will be.
Alternatives
1 . Continue to hold to the September 1 , 1981 , deadline for execu-
tion of the assessment agreement , and instruct staff to work
with both bodies to get the agreement in a form to be signed
by all parties . This is an unlikely objective given the
County' s position.
2 . Capitalize on the positive effect of the "deadline" and extend
it 3-4 months to insure that the parking lot improvements are
in fact made . This alternative would be acceptable to both the
County and Hospital , is likely to have the desired effect , but
compounds the situation(s) discussed above under "other considera-
tions".
3. Drop the deadline and the proposed Block #57 Assessment Agree-
ment because the objective of creating parking on Block #57
has been substantially achieved and the toughest problem, that
of acquisition, now appears solved (only 3 parcels remain) .
4. Enter separate agreements with the Hospital and the County
in which each outlines its parking lot development plans and
makes a commitment to follow through.
Recommendation
The Assistant City Attorney and I recommend alternative #2
for the reasons discussed above .
Action Requested
Motion to set a new deadline for execution of a Block #57
Assessment Agreement for January 1 , 1982 .
JKA/jms
C
b
MEMO TO: John Anderson
City Administrator
.FOM: H. R. Spurrier
City Engineer
RE: Fuller Street Storm Sewer Lateral
DATE: August 14+, 1981
Introduction:
The feasibility report for the Fuller Street Storm Sewer Laterals was ordered
by Resolution No. 1829 on April 28, 1981.
Background:
The City Council of the City of Shakopee has determined that a parking lot
be established on Block 57, Original Plat of the City of Shakopee. In order
to construct a parking lot on Block 57, additional storm sewer laterals are
required in order to accommodate run-off developed on-site.
In 1980, a major trunk storm sewer was constructed in order to serve laterals
which would drain Block 57 and other property in the vicinity of Block 57•
Scope:
This report has investigated the cost of extending storm sewer facilities to
serve Block 57, as well as other property adjacent to Block 57 along Fuller
Street between 2nd Avenue and 4th Avenue.
Before the feasibility of the project can be established, certain elements of
policy required by the City must be discussed and established so that feasibility
may be determined.
The. storm sewer facilities proposed to serve Block 57 are designed to
accommodate the storm which has a 20 percent chance of occurring. It is a
so-called "5-year" storm.
Discussion:
In a memoranda dated December 8, 1980, a preliminary estimate of off-
site storm sewer required for the development of Block 57 was prepared. After
a detailed study of the storm sewer requirements for Block 57 and adjacent
land, a more detailed estimate has been prepared.
In
1. Fuller Street Storm Sewer August 14, 1981
Laterals - Feasibility Report Page -2- 6
The detailed study resulted in an estimated cost $22,800.00 less than the
original estimate. The amount $86,200.00 still presents funding problems,
in as much as the ,City is responsible for one-half of that cost, pursuant to
present policy, or $40,650.00. The assessed cost is $47,050.00.
The area benefitted by this lateral is along Fuller Street between 5th Avenue
and 2nd Avenue and amounts to approximately 292,500 square feet. The resulting
rate is approximately 16 cents per square foot. If Block 57 was assessed for
its share of the assessed costs, the assessment would be $14,476.92.
The unadjusted assessment rate was computed in order to determine the approximate
assessment of Block 57. The rate exceeds the amount by which the appraised
value of the property is judged to increase as a result of storm sewer facilities.
Conclusions:
The storm sewer lateral in Fuller Street is judged to be not feasible because
the amount by which the value of the property increases as a result of storm
sewer facilities is less than the estimated assessed cost to the property.
The City must investigate other funding methods for the construction of the
Fuller Street Storm Sewer, Holmes Street Laterals and other drainage projects.
The City must investigate other alternatives for developing Block 57.
Alternatives:
1. Judge the project not feasible and direct City staff to research potential
alternatives for funding storm sewer projects which alternatives could be
used for the Fuller Street Storm Sewer, Holmes Street Laterals, Upper
Valley Drainage and other storm sewer projects proposed for and in the City
of Shakopee.
2. Provide on-site detention for developed runoff in the basin negating any
need for the Holmes Street Trunk Storm Sewer.
3. Do nothing.
Recommendations:
It is the recommendation of City staff that Council approve Alternate No. 1.
HRS/jiw
Attachment: Cost Estimate & Assessment Computations
I her e4:y certify that this plan, specification,or report
`Aa3 Cr.^,;)z.r•.l : by r110 or under my eirect supervision
a;,d t;iat am a duty ^tcred Profession-)
Engine-, nder the = • + ne Stas-Rf Minnesota.
nor Date .. i , istration No. 13389
6
APPENDIX
Cost Estimate
and
Assessment Computations
Storm Sewer Estimate
Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Total
1 18" RCP 730 L.F. $ 28.00 $ 20,440.00
2 24" RCP 380 L.F. 32.00 12,160.00
3 42" RCP 95 L.F. 61.00 5,795.00
4 Standard Manhole 1 Ea. 900.00 900.00
5 84" Diameter Manhole 1 L.S. 3,000.00 3,000.00
6 L.P. Catch Basin 12 Ea. 900.00 10,800.00
7 Remove Curb and Gutter 995 L.F. 2.00 1,990.00
8 Concrete Curb and Gutter 995 L.F. 6.00 5,970.00
9 Bituminous Patches (2341) 800 S.Y. 4.25 3,400.00
10 Sod 2000 S.Y. 2.00 4,000.00
Subtotal $ 68,455.00
10 Percent Construction Contingency 6,845.00
Subtotal $ 75,300.00
8 Percent Technical Services 6,000.00
Improvement District Cost 6,400.00
TOTAL $ 87,700.00
City Share - One-half $87,700 - 6400
2 = $40,650.00
Assessed Cost:
Construction $37,650.00
8 Percent Technical Services 3,000.00
17 Percent Improvment District Cost 6,400.00
Total Assessed Cost $47,050.00
Unadjusted Assessment Rate =
Total Assessment Cost $47,RSA_nd
Bain Area 292,500 = $0.16o85/sq. Ft.
Block 57: 90,000 ($0.16085) = $14,476.92
6
4 'W •: • JLij o
11
N 4th
--'4 n - - :
- V .
,fr '
10(
J co +� f_ -
, c 1 I 15 H3
S>
MP_ 1 . I ,. . ._,/
3rd
, I_
i I1
r. `v�`r
- ' •sem, ,'
: fr) ,
4E.
, ., C\J .
YNO it
7 UJ [
1 I
~ - I IN
' C/) bra X
cr
R O
0
of _
of -4 _ i2 ''� _ _ Q1J1
FULLER ST . LATERAL
T
S ORM SEWER
C
( b )
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson , City Administrator
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Administrative Assistant
RE : Preliminary Cable Ordinance
DATE : August 12 , 1981
Attorney Adrian Herbst has forwarded a retyped version of the
July 23 , 1981 , preliminary draft ordinance previously presented to
the City Council . The previous draft incorporated in rough form the
changes approved by the Ad Hoc Cable Communications Committee. The
retyped version incorporates those previous rough draft changes , the
changes adopted by the City Council at its July 28, 1981 , meeting,
and a few changes recommended by Mr. Herbst to improve the language .
Mr. Herbst has provided a memo (attached) which outlines the addi-
tional changes he has made . I have attached copies of the pages of
the ordinance which incorporate the new revisions and have high-
lighted the changes . These copies should aid the City Council and
Cable Committee in reviewing the changes to assure their concurrence
before adoption of the Request for Proposals .
JA/jam
- 1 'J
MEMORANDUM ` 1Cj
'3/440Pkt,
TO: Chairman and Members
Shakopee Ad Hoc Citizen Advisory Committee on
Cable Television
FROM: Adrian E. Herbst , Committee Attorney
DATE: August 11 , 1981
SUBJECT: Final Draft of Preliminary Franchise Ordinance
Enclosed you will find a copy of the final draft of the
preliminary franchise ordinance which will be included for
distribution with the Request for Proposals. The final draft
consists of all of the changes previously discussed which were
included in the July 23, 1981 draft as well as four other changes
that will clarify the document.
Language has been added to Section 8 . 11D (5) which clarifies
the rate review standard of original cost of the system, less
depreciation.
:Language has been added to Section 8 . 12 which sets forth
the ability of the city to utilize consultant services to assist
in evaluation and upgrading procedures if it so desires .
Language has been added to Section 9 . 01 to reflect the
intent of the city with regard to franchise fees.
Finally, language has been substituted in Section 12 . 01
which will clarify the right of the city to purchase the system.
AEH:ndr
G
UtI ( > ctuv,,.r)
1) The ability of Grantee to render System Services and to derive a
reasonable profit therefrom under the existing rate schedule and proposed rate
schedule;
2) The revenues and profits derived from System services;
3) The efficiency of Grantee;
4) The quality of the service offered by Grantee;
5) A fair rate of return on net-investments (original cost-__lessaccrued
— -- ----
depreciation) in no event shall original cost used in determining net
investment exceed the proposed construction cost contained in Grantee's
offering;
6) A fair rate of return with respect to investments having similar
risks to that of providing cable communication services.
7) The extent to which Grantee has adhered to the terms of this
Franchise;
8) Fairness to residents and subscribers;
9) Capital expenditures by Grantee in providing updated technology
and service to subscribers;
10) Such other factors as City may deem relevant.
E. No rate increase request shall be approved until two years after
completion of construction of the initial service area.
F. The procedures to be followed in changing a rate or charge shall include
at least the following:
1) An application for a rate change will be submitted to City and a
copy filed with the Board.
2) The application shall be supported by statistical and other proof
indicating that the existing rate or charge is inadequate and unreasonable and
-28-
4
G
5c L Pa'u ocG, /et Yte'Le, 1G lf -r r
intervals of less than five (5) years beginning date of the effective date of
acceptance of this Franchise by Grantee.
C. All evaluation sessions shall be open to the public and notice of sessions
published in the same way as a legal notice. Grantee shall notify its subscribers of
all evaluation sessions by announcement on at least two channels of the System
between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. for five consecutive days preceding
each session.
D. To assist in review and evaluation, City may enlist an independent
consultant to conduct an analysis of the System and its performance and to submit a
report of such analysis to the City. All consultant fees and costs shall be paid by
Grantee.
i F. Topics which may be discussed at any evaluation session may include, but
not be limited to, service rate structures, franchise fee, penalties, free or
discounted services, application of new technologies, system performance, services
•
provided, programming offered, community access, local origination, customer
complaipts, privacy, amendments to this Franchise, judicial, Board and FCC ruling,
line extension policies and Grantee or City rules.
clF. During a review and evaluation by City, Grantee shall fully cooperate
with City and shall provide without cost such information and documents as City
may request to reaonably perform the service.
G. If at any time during its review, City determines that reasonable
1,i F evidence exists of inadequate System performance, it may require Grantee to
perform tests and analyses directed toward such suspected inadequacies at the
Grantee's own expense. Grantee shall fully cooperate with City in performing such
testing and shall prepare results and a report, if requested, within 30 days after
notice. The report prepared by Grantee shall include at least:
-31-
SECTION 9. GENERAL FINANCIAL ANI) INSURANCE PROVISIONS
9.01 Payment to City.
A. As compensation for the Franchise to be granted, and in consideration of
permission to use the streets and public way of the City for the construction,
operation, maintenance and reconstruction of a System within the City, and to
defray the costs of franchise regulation, Grantee shall pay to City a franchise fee
as legally authorized and beginning at three
percent (3%) .
B. Payments due City under this provision shall be computed at the end of
each calendar year for that calendar year. Payments shall be due and payable no
later than thirty (30) days after the dates listed in the previous sentence. Each
payment shall be accompanied by a brief report showing the basis for the
computation and such other relevant facts as may be required by City.
C. No acceptance of any payment shall be construed as an accord that the
amount paid is in fact the correct amount, nor shall such acceptance of payment be
construed as a release of any claim City may have for further or additional sums
payable under the provisions of this permit. All amounts paid shall be subject to
audit and recomputation.by City.
D. Following the issuance and acceptance of the Franchise, Grantee shall
initiate franchise fee payments to City at the minimum amount of $2,500.00 per
year payable in annual installments. These payments are to be considered advances
of payments due in later years of the Franchise inasmuch as they exceed the actual
franchise payments due during any year.
9.02 Security Fund.
A. Within thirty (30) days after the effective date of the Franchise, Grantee
shall deposit into a bank account, established by City and maintain on deposit
through the term of this Franchise, the sum of $10,000.00 as security for the
•
-35-
G
SECTION 12. PURCHASE OF SYSTEM
12.01 City's Right to Purchase System.
A. City shall be entitled to a right of first refusal of any bona fide offer to
purchase the system made to Grantee. Bona fide as used in this section means an
offer received by Grantee that it intends to accept. In the event the price shall be
current market value or bona fide offer, whichever is less.
12.02 Procedures. In the event City elects to exercise its right to purchase the
System as provided in Section, the following shall then apply:
A. City and Grantee shall negotiate all terms and conditions of the purchase
of the System.
B. If City and Grantee cannot agree upon the terms and conditions of the
purchase, City shall have the right to proceed to arbitration. Arbitration shall
commence and proceed according to applicable Minnesota law except as follows:
1) The parties shall, within fifteen (15) days of City's decision to
proceed to arbitration, appoint one arbitrator each who is experienced and
kngwledgeable in the purchase and valuation of business property. Arbitrators
shall each agree upon the selection of a third arbitrator, similarly qualified,
within fifteen (15) days after appointment of second arbitrator.
2) Within thirty (30) days after appointment of all arbitrators and
upon ten (10) days written notice to parties, the arbitrators shall commence a
hearing on the terms and conditions of the purchase in dispute.
3) The hearing shall be recorded and may be transcribed at the
request of either party. All hearing proceedings, debates and deliberations
shall be open to the public and at such times and places as contained in the
notice or as thereafter publicly stated in the order to adjourn.
-44-
To: Jean Andre
From: Lou Van Hout
Re: Construction cost estimate of TV cable along rural roads.
Date: 8-13-81
On august 5 you advised me that the City Council had requested some data
from me on this matter. The following is in response.
With a cautionary note that my experience is not in the cable TV area (and
that my estimates are not intended as a rebuttal of previous estimates the Council
has had on this question) I will relate some information regarding a recent
overhead electric line we have constructed in a rural area. The line is a three
phase line, and is as large a line as is usually encountered on distribution
circuits.
The cost of labor and material for this line came to $ 18,500 per mile.
This includes overhead on the labor, and no allowance for overhead for
administration.
In order to compare this with the cost of installing a TV cable on existing
poles, it should be noted that this was an entirely new line, requiring approximately
26 poles per mile, crossarms, insulators (4 per pole) , wire (4 wires) , armor rods,
misc. bolts and connectors, etc.
If a TV cable was run on existing poles, much of the cost of building a new
line is avoided.
One potential problem faced by cable TV companies putting their cable on
existing poles is having to pay the telephone company for the cost of raising or
lowering the telephone wires to allow proper spacing for the TV cable. This will
be a serious problem "in town", but should not be so costly out on the rural roads
since the majority of our lines in those areas carry electric lines only and have
no telephone cables on them to cause the spacing (or clearance) problem.
6c-
In short, I feel that the rule-of-thumb cost estimates for cable TV
construction may not apply in the case of Shakopee. The costs may be lower
than normal in our area due to a) the poles being already in place,
and b) the absence of telephone cables in many cases.
I hope that the above comments will explain the basis of my views on the
cable TV costs in question, and that knowing the reasons behind the views
will help in the resolution of the issues under discussion.
Anita L. Benda
Communications Projects ch.)
1403 Jefferson Avenue
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55105
(612) 698-9621
f
August 16 , 1981
Ms. Jeanne Andre
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear Jeanne:
It is my understanding that the Shakopee City Council has requested
more information about approaches to providing cable communications
service to those areas of the city not included in the initial ser-
vice area as presently defined.
Background
The most recent draft of the Request for Proposals (Draft No. 4)
outlines on a map the initial service area - that area within
which all residential subscribers will receive service at the same
rates. The boundary will be automatically extended to include
any other area of the city that reaches an average density of at
least 40 homes per street mile. (For example, Hillside Estates ,
which is located about 1 11 miles from the planned cable distribution
system, would need to grow to 60 homes before cable service would
be automatically extended to the area. ) The RFP draft states
that those outside the initial service area would be served by a
line extension policy and that preference will be given to such
a policy which "recovers the actual cost of time and materials from
persons served by the extension" . This last statement of pre-
ference is one that I believe will effectively cut those persons
in the line extension area off from having cable service avail-
able due to the exorbitant fees involved.
To aid members of the Ad Hoc Cable Communications Committee in
their deliberations on this matter, I supplied figures that in-
dicated the effect of cost to all subscribers if the outlying
areas were to be included in the initial service area.
There is a cost (approximately $100 ,000) of extending the cable
distribution system to pass all of the residents in the outlying
areas. The question is who pays the cost? Present policy states
a preference for those in the 146 residences located outside the
initial service area who want cable services to pay all of the cost.
On the opposite side of the coin, the policy might be changed so
that the entire city is designated as the initial service area
Ms. Jeanne Andre
Page 2
August 16 , 1981
and subscribers to cable throughout the city pay all of the cost.
You have asked me to explore the middle ground - to list alter-
native policies for providing cable service to those in the out-
lying areas of the city.
Alternative A
1 . Maintain initial service area as it is now;
2 . Require applicants to include in the initial service
area any areas which reach an average density of 40
homes per street mile; and
3 . List as a priority provision of service to the
identified line extension areas at the lowest cost
provided that the residents in those areas pay 30%
of the cost of extending lines to their areas .
The residents would have to pay $30 ,000 for extending the lines,
and the operator could determine how to recover that cost. For
example, each resident could pay higher installation fees, and
higher monthly service rates on extended service contracts. (A
$200 installation fee, plus $5 per month more than others for
monthly service under a five year contract. )
Alternative B
1 . and 2 . above; and
3 . List as a priority provision of service to the
identified line extension areas at the lowest cost
provided that the residents pay in proportion to
their proximity to the initial service area and
that they pay 30% of the cost of extending lines
to their areas.
The city could designate Montecito Heights as Zone 1 with one set
of rates, Eaglewood as Zone 3 with another set of rates, and all
the rest as Zone 2 , with a different set of rates.
Alternative C
1 . Expand the initial service area to include those
areas out to Mara ' s Addition to the East and
Deerview Addition to the South;
2. No. 2 above; and
3 . List as a priority provision of service to the re-
maining identified line extension area at the lowest
cost provided that the area' s residents pay part of
the cost of extending the line .
Ms. Jeanne Andre
Page 3
August 16 , 1981
This option would draw the line focus to limit the impact of
the cost to all subscribers to a 4% increase in the total monthly
revenue needed per subscriber (for basic and pay services, in-
stallations, etc. ) .
Alternative D
1 . Maintain initial service area as it is now;
2 . No. 2 above; and
3. List as a priority provision of service to the
identified line extension areas at the lowest
cost.
This option leaves the allocation of costs in the hands of the
applicants , but does not provide much guidance to them in develop-
ing their policies.
Alternative E
1. Maintain present policies; and
2 . State the expectation that those areas on the eastern
part of the city will be served by the system that
will be franchised by Prior Lake and that the City
of Shakopee will endeavor to cooperate with Prior
Lake in a second franchising procedure for that
purpose.
Because five of the identified line extension areas are closer
to the density of population on the north side of Prior Lake,
lines extended from a system serving that area might be less
costly. The City of Shakopee would need to convince Prior Lake
authorities to have their subscribers pay some of the costs of
extending service to the Shakopee areas and to provide for inter-
connection of local channels of the Shakopee system.
Alternative F
1 . Maintain present policies; and
2 . State the city' s intent to reconsider the line ex-
tension issue within a certain time (after construction
of the initial service area is completed, in the fifth
year of the franchise, etc. ) and to possibly allow
a rate increase at that time so that service could be
extended to the areas .
6 �
4,
Ms. Jeanne Andre
Page 4
August 16 , 1981
This policy would delay the issue until more experience is gained
from subscriber demand for cable service in Shakopee. However,
a rate increase to pay the costs of line extension may be less
palatable to subscribers than having it reflected in the original
capital costs and initial rates.
Alternative G
1. Include all industrial and commercial areas in
initial service area.
Industrial and commercial areas may be served by a separate cable-
the institutional network; consequently, this alternative may or
may not insure that cable serving subscribers will pass the identi-
fied line extension areas. Further, there is less experience with
the demand for cable in industrial and commercial areas than with
residential subscribers. Whether commerical and industrial rates
could cover the cost of extending cable to these areas is not
known.
Correction
In an earlier memorandum to you, I suggested that AML microwave
may be an alternative means of supplying the identified line
extension areas with service. However, after checking with
equipment suppliers , I find that microwave would be an even more
costly method of providing service than cable.
I look forward to meeting with the council and committee August
18 to discuss these methods further.
Very truly yours,
eZI1.4.44 6164/404._
Anita Benda
AB: j
Attachment
1
6 C-
Following are the calculations of the effect of serving the line
extension areas on the total monthly revenue needed per subscriber
(for basic and pay service , installation, etc. ) . Assuming 50%
penetration and using the base of $29 . 69 revenue needed per
subscriber per month :
Cumulative Percentage
Cost Add-On Increase
Montecito Heights $. 24 . 8%
Zoschke/Horizon Hgts . . 48 1 . 6%
Riverview .50 1 . 6%
CR89 . 49 1 . 6%
Maras . 59 2. 0%
Hillside Estates . 53 1 . 7%
Timber Trails . 56 1 . 9%
Deerview . 58 2 . 0%
Eaglewood 1 . 16 3 . 9%
To give you an idea of how the figure for total monthly revenue
needed per subscriber relates to monthly service rates, the
following is provided:
Total Monthly Revenue Monthly Service Rate Initial Monthly
Application Needed Per Subscriber As Calculated by Service Rate
Consultant Proposed by
Applicant
Columbia
Heights/Hilltop $24 . 59 $9. 84 $7. 95
Southwest
Suburbs A $24 . 91 $11. 71 $8. 45
B $25 .51 $12 . 12 $7. 45
C $28. 30 $10 . 55 $7 . 95
AB
8/16/81
6C,1
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Jeanne Andre, Administrative Assistant
RE : Adoption of Request for Proposals (RFP) for Cable
Communications
DATE: Autust 14, 1981
The City Council has continued the public hearing to adopt
RFP for a Cable Communications System in Shakopee until its
August 18, 1981 meeting. After further comments from the public
and the cable communications consultant, the City Council should
undertake the following actions :
1 . Move individual changes to RFP desired by City Council
after policy discussion at its August 18th meeting.
2 . a. Either: The RFP is to be adopted as it exists
at the start of the meeting, or with minor changes , in which case
the Council should :
-- Move to adopt July 23 , 1981 preliminary draft RFP
with changes to ordinance (Section VII) as outlined
by Adrian Herbst in August 10, 1981 , draft;
changes in RFP adopted by City Council in July 28
and August 18, 1981 meetings ; and changes in forms
(Section VI) to be designed by Consultant Anita
Benda in line with above-listed changes .
-- Move to close the public hearing.
b. Or: substantial changes are requested, in which case
the Council should :
-- Request staff to make requested revisions and bring
back to the Council for final adoption
-- Continue public hearing until September 1 , 1981 ,
at 8 :00 P .M.
JA/jms
SP
MEMO TO: John Anderson
City Administrator
FROM: H. R. Spurrie - ' '(
City Engineer `
J
EE: VIP Interceptor
DATE: August 17, 1981
Introduction:
At the public hearing for the assessment of the above-referenced project,
an additional alternative assessment method was proposed and is noted in
the attachment as Method 6-A and 6-B. Additionally, staff was directed to
meet with Mr. Gene Goemer and Mr. John Nelson regarding an alternative
assessment for those two properties.
Background:
City staff has recomputed the unit assessments for Method 6-A and 6-B.
Those computations are summarized in the attachment. That attachment may be
compared to the July 17, 1981 memoranda to John Anderson regarding the
assessment of the above-referenced project.
The net affect is a $178.00 per acre increase in Area "A", according to the
assessment map for Method 6-A and an increase of $82.00 in Area "A", "B" and
"C" for Method 6-B.
To reiterate, the principal difference between 6-A and 6-B is that one
assesses the interceptor area where service is provided and the later assesses
property that does not yet have surgace and ie, likely to have non-assessable
front footage.
It was the staff recommendation that the non-assessable front feet be allocated
to an area no greater than Area "A".
City staff has met with Mr. Gene Goemer and Mr. John Nelson regarding adjustments
to the assessments as proposed in the original assessment roll. It is proposed
that the Goemer property be assessed for one residential frontage of 110 front
feet. The resulting adjustment, based on Method 6-A, is an assessment of
$3,509.94, as noted in the attachment.
Staff discussed a similar adjustment with Mr. John Nelson. However, Mr. Nelson
was unwilling to accept such a revision maintaining that the City had not yet
proven that it was feasible to serve his property on Hauer Trail.
John Anderson August 17, 1981
VIP Interceptor Page -2-
City staff asked Mr. Nelson to supply certification from a master plumber
that the construction of such a service was not pra,.tical nor, feasible for
his parcel and further, that City staff would solicit proposals from area
contractors in order to determine the cost of constructing a service line
for Mr. Nelson's property.
A supplemental report regarding Mr. Nelson 's : ervice line will be on the
table August 18, 1981.
In order to satisfy the requirements of law, the as.;essment roll must be in
Y,A
final form to be approved by Council. Therefore, the action that will be
recommended will be an action to approve the formulas used in the computation
of the VIP assessment. The final roll will be presented to Council for
action August 25, 1981.
Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of City staff that:
1. The property of Gene Goemer be asses:,ed pursuant to summary
report attached to this memo.
2. That City Council adopt assessment Alternative 6-A, an
alternative which assesses non-asses;:;able front foot cost
to the interceptor area east of County Road 17.
3. That City staff be directed to prepare an .assessment roll
for the assessing resolution for the VIP Interceptor Sewer
for the August 25, 1981 meeting.
HRS/j iw
Attachment I
•
• I
TABLE 1
ASSESSMENT EQUATIONS
' Special
Alternate Interceptor Interceptor Trunk Lateral
1 IC TC LC
A+B+C A FF
2 IC NA1.TC + TO LC-NAFFC
A+B+C A FF
3 IC + NAFFC TC LC-NAFFC
A+B+C A FF
4 IC + TC LC
A+B+C FF
5 IC TO LC
A+B+C 0 FF
6 IC - IRC TC - TRC LC + IRC + TRC
A+B+C D FF
6A IC - IRC NAFFC TO - TRC LC + IRC + TRC - NAFFC
A+B+C A D FF
6B IC - IRC + NAFFC TC - TRC LC + IRC + TRC - NAFFC
A+B+C D FF
Variable Description and Amounts
Original
Revised Proposal
IC Interceptor Cost $197,856.98 $197,856.98
TC Trunk Cost 140,152.50 140,152.50
LC Lateral Cost 541,903.17 541,903.17
NAFFC Non-Assessable Front Foot Cost 146,405.31 135,251.86
IRC Interceptor Right-of-way Cost 19,150.63 19,150.63
TRC Trunk Right-of-way Cost 13,565.40 13,565.40
A 1980-85 Service Area 821.3703 Acre 827.6883 Acre
B 1985-90 Service Area 342.9128 Acre 338.0055 Acre
C Future Service Area, Presently
Non-Assessable 610.0000 Acre 610.0000 Acre
D 800 Foot Service Area 374.3089 Acre 388.2300 Acre
FF Adjusted Front Footage 14,964.00 Feet 15,386.00 Feet
t
Average Assessable Front 'oot,%ge Ratio
Sanitary ;-war Sanitary Sewer
Actu<,.L FOt,.t,• ,_ Assessable Footage
Eastview 1st Addition 2,052 4,140
Minnesota Valley 1st Addition 1 ,708 2,615
Minnesota Valley 2nd Addition 1 ,745 2,837
Minnesota Valley 3rd Addition 2,60 4 ,442
Prairie View 3rd Addition 2,698 41608
,' Total 11.,69! :Feet 18,642 Feet
Assessable Footage i8,642
Actual Footage 11,691 = L'591_}�
Non-Assessable Front Fuot Calculation
VIP Pipe Length x Ratio
12,858 x 1.5946 = 20,503.37 Adjusted :'ront H-:.et
Lateral Cost $541,903• L7 __
Adjusted Front Footage (AFF) 20,503.37 �' +2995615/F'.F. (Cost/F.F. )
AFF - Assessable Front Feet
20,503.37 - 14,964 = 5,539.37 Non-assessab1, Front Footage (NAFF)
NAFF x Cost/F.F.
5,539.37 x $26.4299561.5/F.F. = $146,405.;,1 'Nuri-Assessable Front Foot Cost (NAFFC)
TABLE
RATE SUMMARY
METHOD 6A METHOD 6B
Area A Ares C Area A
Area B & C
Interceptor $100.27108549/Ac. $100.27108549/Ac. $182.7862754/Ac. $182.786275 4/Ac.
Special
Interceptor $178.2452/Ac.
Trunk $338.1888595/Ac.
$338.1888595/Ac.
Subtotal $616.7051449/Ac.
$520.9751349/Ac.
Lateral $ 26.42995615/F.F.
$ 26.42995615/F.F.
Typical Assessment Fur
Single Family Dwelling
In Area A on 0.5AC.
With 110 Front Feet
METHOD 6A
METHOD 6B
0.5 Ac. x $616.7051449/Ac. = $ 308.35 0.5 Ac. x $520.9751349/Ac. = $ 260.49
110 FF x $26.42995615/F.F. = 2,907,30 77.0 PF x $26.42995615/F.F. = 2,907.30
$3,215.65 53167.79
Pa
Assessment i;e. ._, ( r r
Residential Lor,:: in
METHOD 6A
METHOD 6D
Gene Goeme L'
,.tH_ i; mer
0.9772 Ac. x $616,705.1449/Ac. _ 077 r,c. x $520.9751349/Ac. =
$ 00 C,�E $ 50
110 F.F. x $26.429956.1 j/1�'.F. = 1 .0 (�'. i'. x $26.42995615/F.F. =
9.10
2.,907.30 2,907.30
$3,509.94 $3,416.40
METHOD 6A METHOD 6B
John Nelson ,i„tin Nelson
1.312 Ac. x $616.7051449/Ac. = 7 .312 Ac. x $520.9751349/Ac. =
$ 809.12 $ 683.52
110 F.F. x $26.42995615/F.F. = 110 F.F. x $26.42995615/F.F. =
2,907.30 2,907.30
$3,716.42 $3,590.82
6 4
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: H. R . Spurrier, City Engineer
RE: VIP 'Interceptor 81-1
DATE: August 18 , 1981
The matter of the John Nelson service has been investigated by
staff.
There are first three definitions required to discuss the Nelson
service .
a . feasible - capable of being done
b. practical - capable of being put to use
c . reasonable - not extreme or excessive
What I hope is clear is that the drawing illustrates the service
line construction is feasible and practical irrespective of Joseph
M. Sand , Jr. ' s statement . The drawing clearly indicates it is both
feasible and practical since it conforms in every way to the state
plumbing code .
Pursuant to my discussion with Construction Co.
the project is feasible and they have the equipment to do it .
Council must decide if it is reasonable . It is expensive, but
any way the property is served it is expensive . I judge it is
reasonable compared to the front yard alternative .
Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of city staff that the property of John
and Melba Nelson be assessed in accordance with the recommendations
contained in the memo dated August 17 , 1981 from the City Engineer
on the VIP Sanitary Sewer Interceptor.
HRS/jsc
i
.
_. i ' , 10I , CV
17:::7171:71>
/ \ 'C •74 ) Ott:
`
VJ.) -,- ,.,2,Z 6 __,__ 6,_41:2,,
„,,,.."---...<-
---Vii-'
Additional
Additional cost of construction
Northwest Hillside location
Dragline Mobilization $800.00
8 hrs @ $100.00 800.00
100 ' pipe @ $5 . 31 531 .00
35 ' pipe @ $7 . 25 253 . 75
Tap 175 .00
Pump and Fill Tank 75 .00
120 s .y. restoration @$3.00 360. 00
Total $2994 . 75
Southeast Location
245 ' pipe @ $7 . 25 1776 . 25
Tap 75 .00
Pump and fill tank 75 ,00
270 s .y. restoration 0$3 .00 810.00
Total $2736 . 25
11
S. T1. W & Son excavating
P. 0. BOX 142 SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 445 7004 445-7565
John and Melba Nelson
3043 Mauer Trail
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
It is my opinion that it is not practical to hook up your• House to sewer
due to the expense involved because of the elevation of the hill.
I find it difficult to hook up to the new VIP wine unless Mr. Nelson would
bo with the drop manhole system and as the City is well aware of the cost involved.
I
ot
SSOCIATED
CONTRACTORS , INC .
//MECHANICAL
100 NORTH MARKET SHAKOPEE. MN 55370 PHONE 445 5100
August 14 , 1981
John and Melba Nelson
3043 Hauer Trail
Shakopee , MN 55379
Dear John;
I looked at your home on Hauer Trail regarding sewer
hook up. We feel it is not feasible or practical to hook
up because of the pitch we would have on your sewer.
The problem is -- with the amount of pitch for the sewer
line, the waste water would leave the solid waste in the
line which will cause plugging of sewer . I would recommend
not hooking up. I feel that without a warranty this could
cause you a lot of problems in the future .
Sincerely,
ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL
CONTRACTORS, INC.
/ ;>
' Joseph M. Sand, Jr.
JMS/gep
•
June 28, 1981
City Council and Mayor
City of Shakopee
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear City Council and Mayor:
This letter is in response to the notice of hearing that was
held on the proposed public project 81-2 on Bluff Street.
My uncle, Joseph J. Kopp, deceased in March on 1981, owned Lot
1, Block 17 and Dakota Street vacated between Lot 1, Block 17
and Lot 6, Block "A". This property i.s now in an estate and I
have been appointed by Probate Court as the Personal Represent-
ative of that estate. As a result of this appointment I have a
responsibility to the heirs to protect whatever assets Mr. Kopp
held.
This property has a very low market value now and the estimates
of the project which I was given ($4,00o per lot with an additional
$3,300 for hook-up) seemed very high for that property. I therefore
spoke with Mr. John Anderson and have also met with Mr. Houser and
Mr. Spurrier. We looked at the property mentioned above and agreed
that the land north of the 30 foot setback is in the 100 year flood-
way. We have also agreed that the assessment would not increase
the value of the property as the lots are unbuildable. This prop-
erty is, at present, also zoned multiple family dwelling and the
lots no not even meet the size requirement for a sinble family
dwelling.
I am therefore requesting, as representative of this estate, that
this assessment not be levied on this property as it will not in-
crease the value of the property.
I would respectfully request the city council or a representative
of same to inform me as to your decision in this matter.
Very truly yours,
Mary un Rein, Personal Representative
Estate of Joseph J. Kopp
1007 Pierce Street
Shakopee, Nn. 55379
CC: B. Spurrier
CC: J. Anderson
CC: Gary Thompson, Probate Attorney
MEMO TO: John Anderson
City Administrator
FROM: H. R. Spurrier ' I
City Engineer
RE: Bluff Avenue Improvemc t No. 81-2
Halo 2nd Addition Improvement No. 80-10
DATE: August 18 , 1981
Introduction:
The City of Shakopee received bids for the above-referenced
projects on August 17, 1981. Staff is prepared to make
recommendations regarding the award of contracts to the apparent
low bidder for the work.
Background:
The apparent low bidder for the work was Parrott Construction
Company , 2047 Eagle Creek Blvd. , Shakopee , Minnesota 55379.
This firm has successfully completed numerous projects in the
City of Shakopee and is qualified to perform this work.
The City is in receipt of a letter from Mrs . Mary Susan Rein,
personal representative of the Estate of Joseph J. Kopp, owner
of Lot 1, Block 17, Plat of East Shakopee . In the letter dated
June 28, 1981, Mrs . Rein indicated that due to the setback
restrictions along Bluff Avenue , the lot would be unbuildable and,
therefore, not benefitted by any improvement along Bluff Avenue.
Staff identified approximately 450 feet of frontage that had a
similar problem.
In order to make the lots buildable , it would be necessary to
vary from the present setback requirement . The setback requirements
is 30 feet . Further investigation of the matter by City Planner,
Don Steger, indicates that in Section 11. 03, Subd. 7 , Paragraph S,
normal setback requirements may be waived and the average set-
back of adjacent property used. In the case of property along
Bluff Avenue, the present setback of dwellings varies from 8 to 25
feet . Therefore, it appears that there is sufficient latitude
for variance from front yard setback to make all of the land along
Bluff Avenue buildable and assessable.
Recommendations:
Council offer Resolution No . 1897 , A Resolution Accepting Bids Un
Halo 2nd Addition Improvement Project No. 80-10 and Bluff Avenue
Improvements Project No. 81-2, and move for its adoption.
HRS/j 1w
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. 1_ P7
A Resolution Aceeptis g Lids On .
Halo 2nd Addition Improvements
Improvement No . 80- 10
and
Bluff Avenue Imp ,,•✓ementz
Improvement, No . �' !
WHEREAS , pursuant to arve rt. n for bid for the Halo
2nd . Addition improvements and the BPiff Avenue Improvements , bids
were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the
following bids were received complying with the advertisement :
Parrott Construction, Inc . $171,701. 50
Nodland Associates 209, 907 . 00
Brown & Cris, Inc . 210 ,055 . 69
AND, WHEREAS, it appears that Parrott Construction, Inc . ,
2047 Eagle Creek Blvd.-, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 , is the lowest
responsible bidder for the above-referenced work.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA THAT:
1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to enter into a contract with Parrott Construction, Inc . ,
2047 Eagle Creek Blvd . , Shakopee , Minnesota 55379, in the name
of the City of Shakopee for the improvement of Halo 2nd Addition
improvement No . 80-10 and Bluff Avenue improvement No . 81-2 by
roadway , curb and gutter, sidewalk, sanitary sewer, storm sewer
and watermain according to the plans and specifications therefor
approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City
Clerk.
2 . The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids,
except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next
lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted in session of the City Council of
the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
1981.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
Appro ,,,, i as to form this day of
---- -
City Clerk , 19 81.
---- — —
CityAttorney
4
*),2
MEMO TO: John Anderson •
City Administrator
FROM: H. R. Spurrier ' (5 7
City Engineer /
RE: Improvement of Bluff Avenue - Dakota Street to Halo 1st Addition
DATE: August 14, 1981
Introduction:
The City of Shakopee will receive bids for the construction of sanitary
sewer and watermain in Bluff Avenue between Dakota Street and Halo 1st
Addition and the other improvements required for Halo 2nd Addition on
August 17, 1981.
Background:
City staff will tabulate bids and send the tabulation to the Shakopee Public
Utilities Commission for review and approval for award of the contracts
scheduled for August 18, 1981.
Since the project was ordered June 9, 1981, an assessment problem has become
apparent. Property along the north side of Bluff Avenue is caught between
the 100-year flood plain and the north right-of-way of Bluff Avenue. There
is space for construction of the structures permitted by the zoning provided
the front yard setback requirements are waived.
Should waiver ak variance from the setback requirements along Bluff not be
granted, there is a significant increase in the estimated assessment. That
increase is shown in Table 1 below:
TABLE 1
Watermain Assessment
Original Estimated Revised Estimated
Zoning Frontage Assessment Change Assessment
R-3 50' $1,636.62 $594.03 $2,230.65
R-3 60' 1,963.94 712.84 2,676.78
B-1 50' 1,819.95 660.57 2,480.52
B-1 60' 2,183.94 792.69 2,976.63
Sanitary Sewer Assessment
R-3, B-1 50' $1,620.55 $588.20 $2,208.75
R-3, B-1 60' 1,944.66 705.84 2,650.50
Improvement of Bluff Avenue - August 14, 1981
Dakota Street to Halo 1st Addition Page -2-
Alternatives:
The actual prices bid for the work along Bluff Avenue could be considerably
less than the amount estimated in the feasibility report and in the event the
bids would be 36 percent below the estimate, the project would be feasible
without further analysis and without a decision at this point on whether a
blanket variance ought to be granted north of Bluff Avenue.
In the event the revised estimated assessment based on the actual bid cost
exceeds the increased value, City staff will recommend holding a public
hearing on the assessment prior to award of the contract. The appropriate
resolution or resolutions will be on the table Tuesday, August 18th.
Schedule 1 of the project provides for the completion of public facilities
for Halo 2nd Addition and it is recommended that Schedule 1 be awarded to
the apparent low bidder and Schedule 2 not be awarded until after the public
hearing, should that be necessary.
Reconmrendation:
It is the reconuneruiatiou of City staff that Council award Schedule 1 to the
apparent low bidder and that staff prepare recommendations on whether to award
Schedule 2 prior to an assessment hearing or after the assessment hearing.
Such recommendation will be in supplemental materials on the table August 18,
1981.
HRS/jiw
•J1.LIu .A. 0IT.T,ER, n
JULIUS A.COLLER ATTOIt\LY AT I.A 612-445-1244
1859-1940
2 1 1 WEST FIRST AVENUI
P583-t9
%%A' •:L .:4r
August 3, 1981
AUG la 1981
CITY C ,,, .;A QF ET,,
Mr. John K. Anderson
City Administrator
Shakopee City Hall
129 East First Avenue
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear Mr. Anderson:
You asked for a memo reporting on how the City can place the City-Milwaukee
Railroad ditch maintenance agreement on record in the Office of the Register
of Deeds and/or Registrar of Titles, Scott County, Minnesota, so that all
affected property owners would be put on notice as to its existence.
When I wrote my memo on this drainage ditch matter on March 20, 1981, I did
not know of the existence of the agreement between the Milwaukee Road and
the City of Shakopee dated May 27, 1979 whereby the City assumed all the
responsibility of cleaning and maintaining the two storm sewer outlets and
surge basins on the Milwaukee Road Right-of-way. This agreement not only
nullifies my previous memo but places the full maintenance responsibility on
the City with no obligation on the property owners in the area whatever.
This being the case, why should the property owners be notified? It would
serve no purpose. Even if this agree ent was in recordatle form, it would
in no way change the situation after/reco$ded.
If the City now wants to shift the financial burden entailed in the mainten-
ance of the ditches and surge basins to the land in the area, the most feasible
way would be to create and establish a storm sewer improvement district as
authorized by MSA 44+.016 to 444.21 to be financed by a eistrict-wide tax.
Should the City desire to proceed the study should be directed to determine the
area to be included within the district and the district would then be created
and established by tae passage of an Ordinances but before passing such an
Ordinance a public haaring would have to be held. Immed;.ate costs, of course,
could be handled through a bond issue which would be ret:_red by monies raised
by taxes on the properties within the drainage area.
Very trul yours,,.,
Julius A. Coller, II
City Attorney
JAC/nh
MEMO TO: John Anderson
City Administrator
FROM: Don Steger
City Planner
RE: Nor-Dean 1st Addition - Prelminary and Final Plat Approval
DATE: August 14, 1981
At the August 13, 1981 meeting, the Planning Commission unanimously
recommended approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat of Nor-Dean 1st
Addition, subject to conditions.
The staff's case report to the Planning Commission is attached.
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends:
1. Council move to approve the Preliminary Plat of Nor-Dean
1st Addition; and
2. Council adopt Resolution No. 1895, A Resolution Approving
The Final Plat of Nor-Dean 1st Addition.
DS/jiw
Attachment: Resolution No. 1895
Case Report
4
6 ' �
DATE: August 13, 1981
CASE: PC 81-23P
ITEM: Preliminary and Final Plat of Nor-Dean 1st Addition
APPLICANT: Nor-Dean Enterprises (Dean Morlock)
LOCATION: 1522-1528 East 10th Avenue
ZONING: R-2, Urban Residential
LAND USE: Duplex (Twin Home)
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 11.26; Chapter 12 Subdivision Ordinance
PUBLIC MEETING
CASE HEARD BY PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
Proposal:
The applicant is requesting preliminary and final approval of a two-lot
subdivision. This plat, which is a replat of a lot in the ten-year old
Scenic Heights 3rd Addition, is being requested in order to split an
existing duplex.
Considerations:
1. The plat intends to split the duplex in half (common wall) and also
split the property to enable the sale of each unit. The two proposed
lots meet all zoning requirements (i.e. lot size and setbacks).
2. The original ten-foot drainage and utility easement along the west
property line of Lot 1 is not indicated. This easement must be
included on the hardshell prior to signature and recording.
3. The utilities are separate to each unit, however, the water and sewer
service extends to Ramsey Street, across Lot 2. An easement must be
granted to Lot 1 for service maintenance and a maintenance agreement
must be provided.
4. The applicant's attorney is drafting agreements regarding exterior
maintenance. This agreement must be submitted to City staff for review
and approval prior to recording the subdivision with the County
Recorder.
5. The signature block is in error. The "City Administrator" signature
line must be changed to "City Clerk".
Staff Recommendations:
Staff recommends Preliminary and Final plat approval subject to the following
conditions:
•111
w
7 �
Planning Commission August 13, 1981
Case No. 81-23P Page -2-
1. The ten-foot drainage and utility easement along the west property line
of Lot 1 be included in the hardshell.
2. An easement for water and sewer service be granted to Lot 1 and a
maintenance agreement be provided prior to recording the plat.
3. The agreement covering exterior maintenance be submitted to City staff
for review and approval prier to recording the plat.
4. The signature block be corrected to conform with the Subdivision
Regulations of Shakopee City Code.
Planning Commission Action:
Recommended Council adoption of Preliminary and Final Plat of Nor-Dean 1st
Addition, subject to the above four listed conditions.
City Council Action:
•
City Council Action:
DS/jiw
a•-•
RESOLUTIONNO. 1895
A Resolution Approving The Final Plat Of
Nor-Dean 1st Addition
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee on
August 13, 1981 approved the Final Plat of Nor-Dean 1st Addition and has
recommended its adoption; and
WHEREAS, a notice of a meeting was published and all persons appearing
at the meeting have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has been fully advised in all things.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the Final Plat of Nor-Dean 1st Addition, described
as Lot 14, Block 2, Scenic Heights 3rd Addition, Scott County, Minnesota
be, and the same hereby is approved and adopted with the requirements that:
1. The ten-foot drainage and utility easement along the west
property line of Lot 1 be included in the hardshell;
2. An easement for water and sewer service be granted to
Lot 1 and a maintenance agreement be provided prior to
recording the plat;
3. The agreement covering exterior maintenance be submitted
to City staff for review and approval prior to recording
the plat;
4. The signature block be corrected to conform with the
Subdivision Regulations of Shakopee City Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk be and the
same are hereby authorized and directed to execute said approved plat.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City
of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1981.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
71)
MEMO TO: John Anderson
City Administrator
FEOM: Don Steger
City Planner
RE: Nor-Dean 2nd Addition
DATE: August 11 , 1981
At the August 13, 1981 meeting, the Planning Commission unanimously approved
the Preliminary and Final plat of Nor-Dean 2nd Addition with four conditions.
The staff's case report to the Planning Commission is attached.
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that Council:
1. Move to approve the Preliminary Plat of Nor-Dean 2nd Addition;
and
2. Adopt Resolution No. 1896, A Resolution Approving The Final Plat
Of Nor-Dean 2nd Addition
DS/jiw
Attachments
DATE: August 13, 1981
CASE: PC 81-24P
ITEM: Preliminary and Final Plat of Nor-Dean 2nd Addition
APPLICANT: Nor-Dean Enterprises (Dean Morlock)
LOCATION: 1064-1076 Sibley Street
ZONING: R-2, Urban Residential
LAND USE: Duplex (Twin home)
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 11.26; Chapter 12 Subdivision Ordinance
PUBLIC MELT I NG
CASE HEARD BY PLANNING COPM4ISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
Proposal:
The applicant is requesting preliminary and final approval of a two-lot
subdivision. This plat, which is a replat of a lot in the ten-year old
Scenic Heights 3rd Addition, is being requested in order to split an
existing duplex.
Considerations:
1. The plat intends to split the duplex in half (common wall) and also
split the property to enable the sale of each unit. The two proposed
lots meet all zoning requirements (i.e. lot size and setbacks) .
2. The applicant's attorney is drafting agreements regarding exterior
maintenance. This agreement must be submitted to City staff for review
and approval prior to recording the subdivision with the County Recorder.
3. The signature block is in error. The "City Administrator" signature
line must be changed to "City Clerk".
4. The sidewalk and electrical utilities along County Road 17 (west property
line of both proposed lots) must be provided for in an easement.
5. Water and sewer utilities are separate to each unit, however, the City
Engineer has indicated that these services may cross Lot 1 to Sibley
Street. An easement or perpetual permission must extend between Lot 1
and Lot 2 for service line maintenance and reconstruction, and a
maintenance agreement must be provided.
Staff Recommendations:
Staff recommends preliminary and final approval subject to the following
conditions:
Planning Commission August 13, 1981
Case No. : PC 81-24F Page -2-
1. The agreement covering exterior maintenance be submitted to City
staff for review and approval prior to recording the plat.
2. The signature block be corrected to conform with the Shakopee Subdivision
Regulations.
3. An easement for the sidewalk and utilities along the west property lines
of the lots be included on the hardshell.
4. An easement for water and sewer service be provided between Lot 1 and
Lot 2 and a maintenance agreement be provided prior to recording the
plat.
Planning Commission Action:
Approved plat and recommended adoption of Preliminary and Final Plat of !'
Nor-Dean 2nd Addition subject to above-listed four conditions.
City Council Action:
DS/jiw
RESOLUTION NO. 1896
A Resolution Approving The Final Plat Of
Nor-Dean 2nd Addition
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee on
August 13, 1981 approved the Final Plat of Nor-Dean 2nd Addition and has
recommended its adoption; and
WHEREAS, a notice of a meeting was published and all persons
appearing at the meeting have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has been fully advised in all things.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the Final Plat of Nor-Dean 2nd Addition, described
as Lot 7, Block 1, Scenic Heights 3rd Addition, Scott County, Minnesota be,
and the same hereby is approved and adopted with the requirements that:
1. The agreement covering exterior maintenance be submitted
to the City staff for review and approval prior to
recording the plat;
2. The signature block be corrected to conform with the Shakopee
Subdivision Regulations;
3. An easement for the sidewalk and utilities along the west
property lines of the lots be included on the hardshell;
4. An easement for water and sewer service be provided
between Lot 1 and Lot 2 and a maintenance agreement be
provided prior to recording the plat.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk be and the
same are hereby authorized and directed to execute said approved plat.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
1981.
of pit„ kit,,
ATTE,F
Kt/
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Ordinance No. 71
DATE: August 14, 1981
Background
Staff was directed to prepare an ordinance increasing the bond
requirements for On Sale and Off Sale Liquor Licenses . Mr.
Coller has prepared the attached ordinance for Council considera-
tion.
Action
Offer Ordinance No. 71 , An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee ,
Minnesota , amending Shakopee City Code Chapter 5 entitled
"Liquor, Beer and Wine Licensing and Regulation" by increasing
the amount of surety bond for such licenses as required by
Section 5 . 32 Subd. 6 and adopting by reference Shakopee City
Code Chapter 1 and Section 5 . 99, and move its adoption.
JSC/jms -
ORDINANCE NO. 71
FOURTH SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING SHAKOPEE CITY
CODE CHAPTER 5 ENTITLED "LIQUOR, BEER AND WINE DCENSING AND REGULATION"
BY INCREASING THE AMOUNT OF SURETY BOND FOR SUCH LICENSES AS REQUIRED
BY SECTION 5.32 Subd. 6 AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE SHAKOPEE CITY CODE
CHAPTER 1 and SECTION 5.99
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECTION I: REPEAL
Second sentence of said 6 of Section 5.32, Chapter 5, which provides that
"Every application shall be accompanied by a surety bond in the amount of $1,000.00
for an off-sale license and $3,000.00 for an on-sale license." is hereby repealed.
SECTION II Shakopee City Code, Chapter 5, Sec 5.32 Subd. 6 Amended
Shakopee City Code, Chapter 5, Section 5.32 Subd. 6 is amended by adding
the following provisions:
"Every application shall be accompanied by a surety bond in the amount of
$5,000. 00 for an off-sale license and $5,000.00 for an on-sale license."
SECTION III Adopted by reference
The general provisions and definitions applicable to the entire City Code
including the penalty provisions of Chapter 1 and Section 5.99 entitled "Violations
a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated
verbatim herein.
SECTION IV When in force and effect
After the adoption, signing and attestation of this Ordinance it shall
be published once in the official newspaper of the City of Shakopee and it shall be
in full force and effect on and after the date following such publication.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this day of _ -- , 1981.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Administrator
Prepared and approved as to form this
3r44-4ay ofgust, 1981.
Ju CWS A. Coller, II
City Attorne
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson , City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Ordinance No . 72
DATE: August 14, 1981
Background
Staff was directed to prepare an ordinance amending the Zoning
Ordinance to provide for the filing of a bond and bringing
structure up to code within six months after it is moved in .
Mr. Coller has prepared the attached ordinance for Council
consideration.
Action
Offer Ordinance No. 72 , An Ordinance of the City of Shakopee ,
Minnesota , amending Shakopee City Code Chapter 11 entitled
"Land Use Regulation" by repealing paragraphs D and F of
Subd . 9 Sec 11 .05 and adopting new paragraph D and F Subd.
9 Sec 11 .05 as herein setout and adopting by reference Shakopee
City Code Chapter 1 and Section 11 . 99, and moved its adoption.
JSC/jms
1 I-
-?
ORDINANCE NO. 72_ r
FOURTH SERIES
SHAKOPEE,F SHAKOPEE CITY
AN
CHAPTERORDINANCE 11OTHE
"LAND EREGULATIO0" BY REPEALING PARAGRAPHS
CODEAO
D AND F OF SUED. 9 SEC 11.05 AND OINBYNRF.FERENCEASHAI�OPEE CITYBDODE
. 9
SEC 11.05 a's HEREIN SETOUT AND ADOPTING
CHAPTER 1 and SECTION 11.99
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECT_ION I__REPEAL
Paragraphs D and F of Surd 9 Sec 11.05 are hereby repealed.
SECTION II: Sha__ kopee Cit Code Sec 11.05, Subd 9 is hereby amended by
adding the following par15
a
D. The dwelling
unit must meet all requirements of the building code
thin six (6) months after it is moved. A bond shall be required equal in amount
within
to the cost necessary to abate any deficiencies that might exist as determined y
i the Planning Commission or City Administrator.
F. Structures other than dwelling units must meet the following minimum
standards: months
1. Meet all requirements of the Building code within six (6)
after it is moved. A bond shall be required equal in amount to the cost necessary
r
to abate deficiencies that might exist as determined by the Planning Commission
City Administrator.
2. Be compatible with adajacent homes and structures.
SECTION III: Adopted Reference Code
The general provisions and definitions applicable to the entire City
udin the penalty provision of Chapter 1 and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation
incl g repeated
a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though
verbatim herein.
SECTION IV:-When Force and Effect it shall be
1-14
signing and attestation of this Ordinance,
` After the adoption, g
published once in the official newspaper of the City of Shakopee and shall be in
4
such publication.
full force and effect on and after the date following of Shakopee,
R, Adopted in __
>ssion of the City Council of the City
1981.
a, hcl v. day
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson , City Administrator
FROM: Judith S . Cox, City Clerk
RE: Holmes Street Storm Sewer Appeals
DATE: August 14, 1981
Introduction
After the hearing on the appeals to the above assessment , District
Court Judge Daly ordered that the City hold another public hearing
on the assessments for the parcels upon which appeals were made .
The attached resolution declares the assessments for the parcels
in question and sets a public hearing for September 8, 1981 at
8 : 30 P.M.
Action
Offer Resolution No . 1894, A Resolution Declaring The Cost To Be
Assessed And Ordering The Preparation Of Proposed Assessment 80-3
(Trunk Storm Sewer Appeals) , and move its adoption.
JSC/jms
0 �
RESOLUTION NO. 1894
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING THE PREPARA-
TION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT 80-3 (Trunk Storm Sewer Appeals)
WHEREAS , property owners in the City of Shakopee were specially
assessed for the Holmes Street trunk storm sewer (80-3) an amount
totalling $282 ,573 . 28 ; and
WHEREAS, a number of property owners assessed for the said
improvement did appeal their assessments ; and
•
WHEREAS, after a hearing on the appeals , District Court Judge
John Daly set aside the special assessments levied by the Shakopee City
Council and ordered a reassessment of the parcels in question.
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1 . The cost of the Holmes Street trunk storm sewer improvement
to be specially assessed against parcels : 27-001-0000-060-00;
27-001-0000-059-00; 27-001-0000-140-00; 27-001 -0000-256-00,
27-001-0000-257-00; 27-001-0000-156-00; 27-001-0000-157-00;
27-001-0000-283-00
is hereby declared to be $6 , 520. 11 .
2 . The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer
shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be speciall.yassessed
for such improvement against said parcels of land which are within the
district affected , without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law,
and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for
public inspection.
3. That the City Clerk shall , upon the completion of such
proposed assessment , notify the City Council thereof.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
1 . That a hearing shall be held on the 8th day of September,
1981 , in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 8 : 30 o ' clock P.M. to pass
upon such proposed assessments and at such time and place all persons
owning property affected by such improvements and proposed assessments
will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment .
-y
G'
Resolution No. 1894
page -2-
2 . That the City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of
the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the officia
newspaper of the City of Shakopee at least two weeks prior to the hearing
and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the imrpovements . Fie
shall also cause mailed notice of such hearing to be given the owner
of each parcel in question not less than two weeks prior to the hearing.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee , Minnesota held this day of
1981 .
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of August , 1981 .
City Attorney
• PC (
MEMO TO : Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson , City Administrator
RE : Proposed Park Ordinance
DATE: August 14, 1981
Introduction
Attached is the City Attorney ' s proposed ordinance establishing
Chapter 14 Regulating and Governing the Use of Parks .
Background
The City Attorney has updated the old ordinance by using current
definitions and referring to current authorities . He chose to
define littering and vandalism because he felt it was useful to
tell people what we were prohibiting.
The City Attorney did not include a clause on fireworks because
it is now governed by state law, nor did he cover the "neighborhood
park" concept because we could not figure out how to incorporate
it in the ordinance . If Council would still like to use the
neighborhood park concept the City Attorney said he would need
more guidance on how to use it .
Action Requested
Discuss the proposed ordinance and if it is sufficient to
accomplish Council ' s objective , adopt Ordinance No . 73 .
JKA/jms
gd
ORDINANCE NO. 7 3
Fourth Series
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING SHAKOPEE CITY
CODE BY ADDING THERETO A NEW CHAPTER ENTITLED "CHAPTER 14 REGULATING. AND
GOVERNING THE USE OF PARKS" AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION
THEREOF AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE SHAKOPEE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECTION 1: Definition of"Parks"
For the purpose of this ordinance theword "parks" shall mean a park,
Parkway, trail, playground, athletic field, swimming pool, recreation center or
other area in the City, owned, leased or used, wholly or in part, by Cpl.. City for
recreational purposes and for such uses that are normally associated with parks.
SECTION II: Activity Scheduled in Parks
Shakopee's Parks are intended for the benefit of all. To facilitate
maximum, uniform and orderly usage of park facilities, the Shakopee Community
Services is delegated as the agency to coordinate and schedule the use of park
areas and facilities.
SECTION III: Regulations
The following regulations shall apply to all City parks unless otherwise
specified:
A. Speed Laws - No person shall operate a motor vehicle in any park at
a speed in excess of 15 miles per hour except emergency vehicle.
B. Parking - No person other than park personnel shall park any motor
vehicle in any place in a public park except in designated areas and no person shall
operate any motor vehicle in any place except on established roads, driveways or
parking areas.
C. Hours - No person shall be or remain in any park between the hours of
10:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. except those who, without delay, are traveling through the
parks on established walks, paths or streets, or are in activities that have been
scheduled by property City authorities.
D. Camping - Overnight camping is permitted only in the areas designated
for such activities and so posted.
E. Building of fires - No fires shall be lighted or made in any park
except in places and in containers intended for such purposes. This section does not
A
d
apply to City employees engaged in cleaning or maintaining the area.
F. Firearms - No person or persons shall discharge any firearm In
park without first securing specific approval from Shakopee CommuniLy Services anl
a rerait from the Shakopee Chief of Police.
G. Litterinr - No person shall cast, deposit, throw, lay, place or
scatter any lighted or unlighted cigars or cigarettes, chewing gum, chewing gum
wrappers, glass, bottles, cans, nails, wire, crockery or other sharp or cutting
substances, or any refuse matter of any kind anywhere, except in refuse containers
:•rovided for this purpcse. Live charcoal coals Ana ashes shall be deposited only
in containers designated for this purpose.
H. Swimming sad bathing - Swimming and bathing will be permitted only
in designated and posted areas.
I. Dangerous CAM S No person shall play any game of baseball, tackle
football, f,,olf or other games dangerous to the welfare of other persons and
property excepting in cress provided for thia purpose and so Poste6.
J. Vandalism - No person shall write apon, mark, destroy or otherwise.
deface in any way any property or thing pertaining to or in said parks.
No parson shall paste or affix or inscribe any handbill or poster on
w stricture or property within any park nor on any road or roadway adlacmt thereto.
No person shall break, cut, mutilate, injure, remove or cern, away any
tree, plant, flower, shrub, rock, soil or any other park property except in the case
of City personnel engar,ed in maintenance and development thereof.
K. Control of Pets - No pets shall be allowed in any park except when
they are under control on a leash or confined. No person shall ride a horse or other
Amimal except on designated trails, paths and areas. No nerson shall disturb or
interfere with any wild life.
L. Sales - No person or persons other than City personnel shall he
permitted to sell any article or producr/l/ANtPilermit from Shakopee Community
Service.
Alcoholic beverages - No person shall possess, display, consume or
use intoxicating liquors while in a park. No person shall possess, display, consume
an use non-intoxicating malt liquors except in picnic, grandstand and shelter areas.
- 2 -
111
'if 64\
N. Tennis Courts - No one shall ride bicycles or any other chicle
on the tennis court nor drive them thereon or use the courts For any other purpose
than playing tennis without specific permission from Shakopee Comunity Services.
O. Ice Skating Rinks - Ice hockey will only b permitted on rinks posted
for hockey. No hockey sticks or pucks shall be allowed on any other park rink. No
%ehicies of any kind excepting those used by City personnel will be allowed on any
skating area.
SECTION IV: Penalty provisions adopted
Any person who violates a section, subdivision, paragraph or provision
of this Ordinance shall upon conviction be guilty of a misdemeanor. Shakopee City
Code Chapter 1 entitled 'General Provisions and Definitions applicable to the
entire City Code including penalty for violations" is hereby adopted in its
entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim herein.
SECTION V: When Inforce
This Ordinance shall be published once in the official newspaper of the
City of Shakopee and shall be in full force and effect on and after the date of
such publication.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota tis
(la ' of , 1981.
Mayor
ATMST:
City Clerk
Prepared and approved as to form
this 12th day of August, 198 -
City Attorney
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S . Cox, City Clerk
RE: Application for On Sale and Sunday Liquor License
Iowa Falls Inc . , 101 East 1st Avenue
DATE: August 14, 1981
Introduction
I have received an application for an On Sale and a Sunday liquor
license from Iowa Falls Inc .
Background
The Police report on the three stockholders is attached.
The Building Inspector has notified the current owners that he
would recommend denial of the application , unless he received
a copy of a signed contract to make needed repairs to the build-
ing. I have received the attached quote only.
At this point in time I have not received the proper fee nor
the liquor liability insurance policy.
Recommendation
Unless the fee and insurance policy are received and in order
prior to Tuesday' s meeting, I would recommend Council table the
applications until the necessary documents are in order.
Action
Table applications for an On Sale and a Sunday intoxicating
liquor licenses from Iowa Falls Inc .
JSC/jms
V
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Application for Liquor License
Iowa Falls , Inc. (House of Hoy Inc . )
DATE: August 18 , 1981
At the close of the day, the application submitted to me sometime
ago is still incomplete . I have not received the liquor liability
insurance policy nor have I received the proper fee .
The owners of the building are planning on attending the meeting
tonight and will bring a signed contract for the repair work to the
building as requested by Mr Houser. (Mr. Scarborough or Dr. McKeen)
Mr. Scarborough, one of the property owners , informed me today
that the lease the current applicant has signed with a former owner
is invalid because Mr. Scarborough and partner have not approved it ,
which is a requirement before a sub-lease is valid . Mr. Scarborough ' s
partner, Dr. Donald McKeen will be at the meeting tonight .
Should the repair work problem and the lease be resolved , the
insurance and fee are not in order, so the application should be tabled .
jc
„ . City of Shakopee
v/rec.ors.-nbL....__ ,A-\
/�' H A K p p E POLICE DEPARTMENT
�,r 5 f
,) \ a'��N E 5 p r1 ; .0 476 South Gorman Street "k.: *k. j”
i _; 0) A i SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379
f5 � Tel. 445-6666 ¢`a <:
L 1 ""
, 1. , 379 e _
' �,y
August 14, 1981
TO: Mayor , Council Members
FROM: Tom Brownell
SUBJECT: Liquor License Application - Opera House
DATE: - August 14, 1981
The Police Department has conducted an investigation relative
to individuals submitting an application for an on/off sale
intoxicating liquor license in the name of Iowa Falls, Inc .
No information was developed which would result in a license
denial under the existing data privacy act.
go cSEzvE 9)zotect
-
. • V a.......
...._ ,.
_ ....,::-._,:., ,..._.._..-.... ..... ,.,,..,.-...„:,.;-:‘,
3956 6,00rrior., / .' :::,:,-.,,,o;.S, WIInn. 55407
.-:-....:..... "....•—•....;:1;47
, ,,... •
.........____ .
..,...,,, ,..,.. -_,UoMITTEL) TO
•,., •••1/../c,. zr-,1„„/ •- DATE
, . ••• e-, ...../
•
1 c,... 1 '.1 tr •„..1
j 1...- '.
_ ./..///i- • . •/...• ••• ''' /;„ / /,,,,2 c...*; .. ....,...:.-_,...:
..i- I ..,D ZIP CC.)01. ,.....,,„;
,.lo. . '.A1.r ... .-
) ' •
. .
•
. • ./ i I
.-----.-..-.---..-......
I DATE OF PLANS ...
. 1 • '
'JOB PFIONE
• -
.
. i --, ,
--- _________________.-
•,- perei..,/sLomit speitications and estimates for: 1
,
, •. •-t,..'/ ' .-) ',- ' 7-- c-- /171 '
, .
. „...--
— - - • 1.... C c -" •,- j„..._. is.!. k: ..4,4.-..L, .e..-... 4. •...../,. _.. __,_. ,
/ .... ,5
(•.. ,-1 ...- 4- ‘, ,. ,,......., c.4 L' r 4. -4. 11/4....- . , 2.%.... di•••......t r...... ., a,„. c'e; L'''e...:.„.• e i t....., .4 ,.--,_,.....„ .,„.,..' .....2„, ,,,„ ,./....',..: Il
II
,• /• , Ii
- • . - - i ' -•" I': ';---f'- L.:(... - //-I
- •
'
„...i. (,_,'
I /..--- -.' /, e-! ' i' • ,• i
fy---"4:-,..-• 4.--- •'•••••1.-.
• / /
/
„ i_ , ty ,../ 2,,.Z .1.•C.',..),...,,'... .,,,,...
, -- ---- 4 ' ...,
t.... .
...r ,1
li
.. .
. . ,
If
. 1
. 1
I
lit
1
. 1
. il
hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: jl
,
/ a. 2
....-_, ...
, .--• ..,/''!" ..(.• .-.) A.,. ,, - .,' . ,:;" ‘.-/ ..-.--' > ' ' : , dollars($ ; , ..,I J ). II
_ --
,-,..:,r.-,cr,, to be made as follows: ii /
I 1,
L-.- • ' II
11
.----, I
I
' ; :„ :7— /-.- ./. I. ,-, '. . ,. . - -: . /'
t 1 /_ 77
_.,.....1
mLterial is guaranteed to be as//specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike / ('-'--- , y/
.1:101.,i,ccording to standard practices.Any alteration or deviation from above specifica• Authorized ;•\ , ..../,....- k ' :.c//•
Ir.,..3;V:r.,";extra costs will be executed only upon written orders,and will become an Signature I
..-,./a cliar;.;e over and above the estimate.All agreements contingent upon strikes.accidents
er•ail...y.beyond our control.Owner to carry fire,tornado and other necessary insurance. Note:This proposal may be
, 1 ,
v.iirki.rn arc fully covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance, withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. j
//
• .. •. . _ .. . _ „..
, • , ..C '':It. ,,,,,,, ... ,I
01.0.01,lit i4 W., ..III•I di..111.111% . li
...ILI l 1,,,J1i. . all :/,111,..1610.../11/ /111(1 ilii! 11,1,1/Y /ILI Iyil•tl. You ale authuilied 1"0"I''''' -
tu i.a Via work as specified.Payment will be made as outlined above. i
l'I
Signature lit
/X
r....e
Ci Acceptance:
\ 4/
-,.., - - - —
re-Oi I I• I 001,103/41 Iii, HI ka i II,”Am.1/11N1111,i1 Plt1,,1 t 01. •//,,,,II tAitth /.1401
• g Ca-.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA
APPLICATION FOR ON/OFF SALE INTOXICATING LIOUOR LICENSE
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
rections : This form must be filled out with typewriter or by printing in ink .
If the application is by a natural person , by such person; if by a
corporation, by an officer thereof; if by a partnership , by one of
the partners ; if by an unincorporated association , by the manager
or managing officer thereof.
Name of applicant ( Name of individual , partnership , corporation or association)
Iowa Falls, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
Business Name d/b/a: Opera House Saloon
Business Address 101 First Avenue East, Shakopee, Minnesota Phone
IF BUSINESS IS TO BE CONDUCTED UNDER A DESIGNATION , NAME , OR STYLE
OTHER THAN FULL INDIVIDUAL NAME OF THE APPLICANT, ATTACH TWO COPIES
OF THE TRADE NAME CERTIFICATE , AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 333 , MINNESOTA
STATUTES , CERTIFIED BY THE CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT.
Type of applicant:
Natural Person ( Individual ) Partnership
x Corporation Association or other
Type of license applicant seeks :
x On Sale On Sale Club x On Sale "Special Sunday Sales"
1 ) . If applicant is a natural person ( individual ) , state full name, residence
and business address and telephone numbers .
Full Name
Residence Address ' hone
Business Address Phone
)) . The full name, res ' . nce address and telephone number of the agent in
charge of the ia , ' idual owner ' s premises at such time as the owner is
absent .
General. Information (On/Off Sale Intoxicating) U
•
4. Full Name Interest
•
Residence Address Phone
Business Address Pho •
( b) . The managing partner will be:
Full Name Phone
Address
( c) . The full name, residence address and telenho e number of the assistant
manager, food manager, beverage manager , d any other individual with
management responsibilities of the part rship ' s premises to be licensed :
1 . Full Name _ Phone
Address
2 . Full Name _ Phone
Address
3 . Full Name Phone
Address -
A PART II-Personal • istory form must be filled out and attached for each of the
indivi . als listed in 6a , 6b , and 6c . )
IF E APPLICATION IS FOR A PARTNERSHIP , ATTACH TWC COPIES
0 THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT AND TWO COPIES OF THt rERTIFI-
CATE OF TRADE NAME UNDER PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 333 , MINNESOTA
STATUTES, CERTIFIED BY THE CLERK OF DISTRICT COU ' .
( a) . If the applicant is a corporation or association , give the name of the
corporation or association , address and phone number and home office
address and phone number.
Name Iowa Falls, Inc. State of Incorporation or Assoc . Minnesota
Address 101 1st Avenue East, Shakopee, Minnesota Phone
(Area Code & Number)
Home Office Address same Phone
. ( Street) (Area Code & Number)
Home Office same
City State Zip Co • e
( b) . The full names , residence addresses and telephone numbers of all officers
of said corporation or association .
President Ronald Nagle Phone 121934-0831
( Area Code & Number)
Residence Address 17918 Bell Circle West, Minnetonka, Minnesota
( Street) (City) ( State) ( Zip Code)
(3)
encral •Information (On /Off Sale Intoxicating)
Vice President N/A Phone
(Area Code & Number)
Residence Address _
( Street) (City) (State) ( Zip Code)
Secretary Thomas O'Meara Phone12/824_6 3o-1
(Area Code & Number)
Residence Address 3427 Humboldt Avenue South, Minneapolis Minnesota
( Street) ICTt F �'(State) ( Zip Code)
Treasurer Charles Ruffenach Phone 612/471-7995
( Area Code & Number)
Residence Address 2473 Black Lake Road, Sprin Park, Minnesota
(Street) ity ( State) (dip Code)
( c) . The full names , residence addresses and telephone numbers of all persons
who singly or together with their spouse and his or her parents , brothers ,
sisters , or children, own or control an interest in said corporation of
association in excess of five percent ( 5%) .
Full Name Ronald Nagle — Interest 33 1/3
Residence Address 17918 Bell Circle West Phone 612/934-0831
Minnetonka, Minnesota ( Area Code & Number)
Full Name Thomas O'Mara Interest 11 1/1
Residence Address 3427 Humboldt Avenue South Phone 612/824-6303
Minneapolis, Minnesota (Area Code & Number)
Full Name Charles Ruffenach Interest 33 1/3 0
Residence Address 2473 Black Lake Road Phone 612/471-7995
Spring Park, Minnesota ( Area Code & Number)
Full Name N/A Interest
Residence Address Phone
(Area Code & Number)
( If additional space is necessary, attach additional sheet)
Thd full name , residence addresses and telephone numbers of the manager,
assistant manager, food manager , beverage manager, and any other individual
with management responsibilities for the corporation ' s or association ' s
premises to be licensed .
Full Name Charles Ruffenach Phone 612/471-7995
(Area Code & Number)
Residence Address 2473 Black Lake Road, Sprint/ Park Minnesota
(Street) (City) ( State) ( Zip Code)
(4)
General Information (On/Off Sale Intoxicating) g CZE
Full Name T Phone
( Area Code & Number)
Residence Address
( Street) (City) (Stated_ ( Zip Code)
Full Name Phone
jArea Code—A Number)
Residence Address
(Street) ( City) -Mate) (Zip Code)
Full Name Phone
- -��- ( Area Code & Number)
Residence Address
( Street) (City) ( State) (Zip Code)
Full Name Phone
(Area Code & Number)
Residence Address
--( Street) City) State) ( Zip Code)
(A PART II-Personal History form must be filled out and attached for individuals
listed in 7b , 7c , and 7d)
ATTACH : 1 ) Two copies of the Certificate of Incorporation .
2) Two copies of Articles of Incorporation or Association Agreement.
3) Two copies of By-Laws to the application .
4) Foreign corporations shall attach two copies of Certificate of
Authority, as described in M . S .A . Chapter 3113 .
8( a) . If the appb, state name of club:-
Date
lubDate that club was first incorporated :
Place of &uch organization :
Present number of members :
The full names , positions , resident - addresses and phone numbers of all
officers , executive committee mem . - rs and members of board of directors :
Full Name - Position
Address Phone
. ( Street, City, tate, Zip Code) (Area Code & Number)
Full Name _ Position
Address Phone
Str • - t, City , State, Zip Code) ( Area Code & Number)
Full Nam - Position
Addr - s Phone
( Street, City, State, Zip Code) ( Area Code & Number)
( 5)
General Information (On/Off Sale Intoxicating) p
Full Name i Position
Address Phone
( Street, City , State, Zip Code) (Area Co & Number)
Full Name Positi •
Address ' one
( Street , City , State, Zip Code) • (Area Code & Number)
(A PART II- Personal History form must filled out and attached for each in-
dividual listed in 8a al : :b. )
ATTACH TWO COPIES OF THE A' LES OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS OF THE CLUB .
THERE MUST BE SUBM D A SWORN STATEMENT THAT THE CLUB HAS BEEN IN EXISTENCE
FOR MORE THAN " EEN YEARS OR , IN THE EVENT THAT THE APPLICANT IS A CONGRESS-
IONALLY CH RED VETERANS ' ORGANIZATION , IN EXISTENCE FOR MORE THAN TEN YEARS .
THE ST . " ENT SHALL BE MADE BY A PERSON WHO HAS PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FACTS
ST ' " 0 THEREIN . IN THE EVENT THAT NO PERSON CAN MAKE SUCH A STATEMENT , SATIS-
FACTORY DOCUMENTARY PROOF MAY BE SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF SUCH FACTS .
THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ANSWERED BY ALL APPLICANTS :
9 . State the exact legal description of the premises to be licensed .
(Applicant must also submit a plot plan showing dimensions , location of
buildings , -street access , parking facilities , and the locations of and
distances to the closest point of a church structure or the closest point
on a lot occupied by a public school ) .
Lot One (1) , Block Four (4) , City of Shakopee
0 . How are the premises zoned under the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance?
B-3 (Central Business)
1 . State full names , residences and business addresses and telephone numbers
of the owner or owners of the building wherein the licensed business will
be 'located , if the owner is other than the applicant.
Full Name Donald K. McKeen one
Residence Address
Business Address Phone
Full Name Phone _
Residence Address
Business Address Phone
( 7)
eneral Information (On/Off Sale Intoxicating)
9' GL-
2 . Where the bruilding is owned by other than applicant , state in summary
the conditions of lease arrangement, such as , term of lease , monthly
rental, renewal privileges , etc . (Two copies of the lease shall be
attached) .
Applicant will assume existing five year lease with five year renewal option.
Present rent is $1200 per month and rent escalates each year. Two copies of
lease attached.
13 . If the building is owned by the individual applicant , partnership , cor-
poration or association , state : N/A
( a ) Datc parc1hase
( b) Name and address of person purchased from
( c) Purchase price Amount of down paym -
( d) Who currently holds the mortgage-Name and Addre .
( e) Amount 'ofcontract for deed
( f) Who currently holds contract for seed-Name and Address
(g) Term of mortgage
( h ) Term of contract fo deed
( i ) Rate of intere on mortgage
( j ) Rate of i erest on contract for deed
( k) Stat - he monthly payment at which the mortgage and/or contract for
de - • is being liquidated
( 1 Are the payments on the mortgage and/or contract for deed up to date?
4. State the amount of the investment that the applicant has in the business
premises , fixtures , furniture, stock in trade , etc .
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, Applicant is investing $137,000 in business, exclusive
of-license feesinsurance costs and inventory costs. Each shareholder is supplying 1/3 of
money to be invested by Applicant. Each shareholder, in turn, will withdraw necessary funds
Attach supporting proof of the source of such money .
from their respective personal accounts. See attached statement of individual shareholders.
( 8)
general Information (On/Off Sale Intoxicating)
15. Give full names , addresses , telephone numbers of all persons , other
than the applicant , who have any financial interest in the business ,
buildings , premises , fixtures , furniture, or stock in trade. State
the nature of the interest amount thereof, and the terms for payment
or other reimbursement. ( This shall include , but not be limited to ,
any lessees , lessors , mortgagors , lendors , lien holders , trustees ,
trustors and persons who have co-signed notes or otherwise loaned ,
pledged , or extended security for any indebtedness of the applicant) .
Full Name Paul A. Scherber Phone
Address 2060 Shoreline Drive South, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391
Nature o f Interest, etc . Security interest held by prior curler.
Full Name Phone
Address
Nature of Interest, etc .
Full Name , Phone
Address
Nature of Interest , etc .
Full Name Phone
Address
Nature of Interest , etc .
The above listed person is the only holder of security interests known to Applicant.
IF THIS APPLICATION IS FOR PREMISES EITHER PLANNED OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION
OR UNDERGOING SUBSTANTIAL ALTERATION , THE APPLICATION SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED
BY A SET OF PRELIMINARY PLANS SHOWING THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED PREMISES
TO BE LICENSED. IF THE PLANS OR DESIGN ARE ON FILE WITH THE MANAGER OF
THE BUILDING AND INSPECTION DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE , NO ADDI-
TIONAL PLANS NEED BE FILED WITH THIS APPLICATION .
6 . State the floor number, general area , and all rooms where intoxicating
liquor is to be sold and consumed . (Applicant shall attach a floor plan
showing dimensions and indicating number of persons intended to be served
in the said rooms . )
Ground floor only (approximately square feet)
(9)
`neral Information (On/Off Sale Intoxicating)
eL
7 . What permits required by the Federal government have been applied for
or issued for the premises ? In what name were these applied for or
issued and what is the nature of the permit?
The Applicant, by charles Ruffenach as Manager, will immediately apply for the
Federal Special Tax Stamp Number.
B. What permits or licenses required by the State of Minnesota have been
applied for or issued for the premises ? In what name were these applied
for or issued and what is the nature of the permit or license?
The Applicant has applied for the Minnesota Business Identification Number.
3 . Are any real estate taxes , personal property taxes , special assessments ,
or other financial claims of the City of Shakopee delinquent or unpaid
for the premises to be licensed? Yes No x If yes , give details .
I. Names , residence addresses , business addresses , and telephone numbers of
three persons of good moral character, not related to the applicant or
financially interested in the premises or business , who may be referred
to as to the applicant ' s character .
Full Name Jim Hagan Phone
(Area Code & Number)
Residence Address
( Street) ( City) ( State) ( Zip Code)
Business Address St. Louis Park, Minnesota _ Phone 612/925-3660
(Area Code & Number)
(10)
neral Information ( On/Off Sale Intoxicating)
9 a ,-
Ful l Name Steve Johnson Phone
(Area Code & Number)
Residence Address
( Street) (City] ( State) ( Zip Code)
Business Address .St. Louis Park, Minnesota Phone 612/925-3660
(Area Code & Number)
Full Name Gary Beyer Phone
A _ (Area Code & Number)
Residence Address
( Streets TCity) ( State) (7ip Code)
Business Address St. Louis Park, Minnesota Phone 612/925-3660
(Area Code & Number)
Financial Statement of net worth and a short autobiography must accompany
is application for all persons who are required to complete a Part II Personal
formation form . ( Exception - Manager, Assistant Manager , Food Manager, and
verage Manager, provided these individuals are not partners , officers of
rporation , or do not hold an interest in excess of five ( 5%) percent) .
IOWA FALLS, INC.
f ,
By: r
(Signature ofA:pplicant)
Ronald Nagle, President
Y FALSIFICATION OF ANSWERS TO THE PRECEEDING OUESTIONS WILL RESULT IN DENIAL OF
E APPLICATION .
( 11 )
THE OPERA HOUSE SALOON
LUNCH MENU
Served 11 :00 to 2 :00)
SANDWICHES:
Corned Beef on Rye
w/ potato chips & pickle $2 10
Turkey Sandwich
w/ potato chips & pickle $2 10
Bratwurst with Saurkraut
w/ potato chips & pickle $1 85
Polish Sausage with Saurkraut
w/ potato chips & pickle $1 85
Ham Sandwich
w/ potato chips & pickle $1 95
BEVERAGES :
Pop (large) $ 65
[Coke , Sprite , Orange] (small) 45
Milk (large) $ 65
(small) 45
- Served 7 Days A Week -
9L
MEMO TO : John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: Family Dining Inc. (1 & 44 Off Sale)
DATE: August 14, 1981
Introduction
The owners of Family Dining Inc . propose to build a new structure
and move their existing business by next spring. Prior to commencing
construction, they would like to know if the Council will agree to
transfer their license to the new site when they are ready to move
in. Formal approval will have to be delayed until they are ready
to move in, just an approval of intent is in order now.
Action
Move to approve the proposed site just east of Landy ' s Camping
Center as the new location for Family Dining Inc .
JSC/jms
•
Robert D. Bell
7024 Sally Lane
Edina, Mn. 55417
City of Shakopee
City Council
129 E 1st Ave.
Shakopee, Mn. 55379
Attn: Judy Cox
I, Robert D. Bell, Secretary Treasurer of Family
Dining Inc . , dba 1 & 44 Liquor Center would like to request
the city council's consideration on relocation of our current
off sale liquor license.
The move would be from its present site at Hwy 101
and Cty Rd 89 to a site East of Landey Camping Center and
West of Case Company. A new building will be erected on this
site. A general concensus of approval from the council is need-
ed at this time for a transfer to this new site.
Our target date for opening will be June 1 , 1982; we
will then come back to the council for your final approval of
transfer prior to opening.
Sincerely,
. :�► 4 _
RECEIVED
AUG 3 - 1981
CITY OF SIAKOPEI
571-6066 ciet
UBURBAN 6875 Highway No. 65 N. E.
NQINEERING Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432
INC.
890-6510
4)1 Civil, Municipal & Environmental Engineering 1101 Cliff Road
Land Surveying • Land Planning • Soil Testing Burnsville, Minnesota 55337
Aug. 14 ,1981
File S78085
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Administrator and City Council
FROM: Suburban Engineering, Inc .
SUBJECT: Assessment Method - T.H. 101 Trunk Water Main
In preparing the assessment roll for the above improvement ,
we find the City Policy for determining adjusted front footage
is not clear to us .
It appears that the policy was written with residential
and commercial property in mind because it fits with the City Zoning
Ordinance requiring 9,000 square feet minimun lot size and 60 feet
of frontage. IndusLrial lands require much greater lot sizes and
the Policy does not seem to be proper if we interpret it the same
way.
We have prepared two assessment calculations for the improve-
ment for your review. Method "B" is based on a literal interpret-
ation of the Policy for adjusted front footage. Method "A" is
based on actual frontage with adjustments made only for corner
lot credits and does not relate to depth of the lot as does
Method "B" .
We suggest the matter be considered by the Council for clar-
ification before a final assessment roll is adopted.
•
.. " )
William E. PI oe , P.E.
Robert Minder,Reg.Eng. E.A.Rathbun,Reg.Suru. Wm.E.Price,Reg.Eng. Gary R.Harris,Reg.Suru. Peter J.Molinaro,Reg.Eng.
Wm.E.Jensen,Reg.Eng. William J.Brezinsky,Reg.Eng. H.William Rogers,Reg.Suru. Bruce A.Paterson,Reg.Eng. Daniel P.Johnson,Reg.Eng.
Kim W. Waldof,Reg.Eng. Robert Sikich,Reg.Surv. Peter J.Knaeble,Reg.Eng.
571-6066
Lts-4 UBURBAN 6875 Highway No. 65 N. E.
NOINEERINIINCCG. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432
— 890-6510
r4 —
Civil, Municipal & Environmental Engineering 1101 Cliff Road
LI Land Surveying • Land Planning • Soil Testing Burnsville, Minnesota 55337
Aug. 12 ,1981
File S78085
SUMMARY OF PROJECTS COSTS
T. H. 101 TRUNK WATERMAIN EXTENSION- - PROJ. No. 80-11
METHOD "A" & "B"
1 . CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT COST $172 ,568 . 05
2 . CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES
Basic Fee $14,323 . 15
Staking of work $ 3 ,875 . 80
Other Services $ 2 ,134.00
Assessment Roll (Est . ) $ 2 ,500 . 00
As-Built Record (Est . ) $ 1 ,500 .00 $ 24,332 . 95
3 . CITY COSTS
Shakopee Public Utilities $ 5 ,975 .00
City Administration $ 1 , 760.00
City Engineering $ 1 ,555.00
Advertising $ 150 .00
Bond Consultant $ 2 ,070.00
Bond Printing $ 145 . 00
Bond Attorney $ 270.00
Moody' s Review $ 245 .00
Capitalized Interest $ 7 ,045 .00
$ 19 ,215 .00
Total Add-On Costs
( =25. 24% of Contract ) $ 43 ,547 . 95
TOTAL IMPROVEMENT $216 ,116 .00
Page 1 of 4
Robert Minder,Reg.Eng. E.F..Rathbun,Reg.Sum. Wm.E.Price,Reg.Eng. Gary R.Harris,Reg Saw, Peter J.Molinaro,Reg.Eng.
Li/m.E.Jensen,Reg.Eng. Wiliam J.Brezinsky,Reg.Eng. H. William Rogers,Reg.Suru. i duce A.Paterson,ft. . 111g. Daniel P.Johnson,Reg.Eng.
Kim W. Waldo',Reg.Eng. Robert Sikich,Reg.Suru. frier J.Knaeble,Reg r al.
8/12/81 9 G
T. H. 101 TRUNK WATERMAIN - PROJ. No. 80-11
METHOD "A"
TOTAL COST12" Watermain
Change Orders 1 & 2 $ 5 ,790.00
Contract Amount $150,844. 50
Misc . @ 25 . 247 $ 39 , 534. 55
TOTAL PROJECT COST $196 ,169. 05
12" Rate $196 ,169 . 05- = $36 . 35/ L.F.
5396 .02
TOTAL COST 8" Watermain
8" Equiv. Contract Amt . $125 ,651 . 90
Misc . @ 25 . 24/ $ 31 ,714. 54
TOTAL 8" PROJECT COST $157 , 366 .44
8" Rate $157 , 36�i.44 = $29 . 16/L.F.
5396 .^02 --
Page 2 of 4
8/12/81 'G
T. H. -101 TRUNK WATERMAIN - PROJ. NO. 80-11
1 r, . . . •
METHOD "A"
A. ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE
12" BENEFIT 901 :08 ' @ $36 . 35/ft . = $ 32 , 754.26
8" BENEFIT 4494 . 94 ' @ $29 . 16/ft . _ $131 ,072 .45
Totals 5396 . 02 ' $163 ,826 . 71
B. TRUNK AREA BENEFIT
103 . 37 Ac . @ $435 .00/Ac , = $ 44 ,965 . 95
C . SPECIAL SERVICES
3-12" Service @ $2 ,211 . 36/ea. = $ 6 ,634 .09
8- 8" Service @ $1 ,457 . 32/ea . = $11 , 658 . 53
1- 6" Service @ $1 ,280. 58/ea. = $ 1 ,280. 58
1- 2" Service @ $ 381 . 98/ea. _ $ 381 . 98
Total. Services $ 19 ,955 . 18
TOTAL ASSESSMENT $228 , 747 . 84
Page 3 of 4
8/12/81 `
T.H. 101TRUNKWATERMAIN - PROJ. No. 80-11
METHOD "A"
Calculation for Assessment Resolution
1 . Contract Cost $172 ,568 .00
2 . Expenses Incurred
(Add-on Costs ) $ 43 ,548.00
Construction Total
This Project $216 ,116 .00
3 . Trunk System Costs
Area Trunk Charge $44,965 . 00
Project Cost-pipe
only $196 ,169 .00
Assessed Cost-pipe
only (-) $163,827 .00
Balance = 12" Trunk
portion of this project (-.)$32,342. 00
Future trunk cost allocated
to this Project $ 12 ,623 .00
TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENT TO BE ASSESSED $228, 739.00
Page 4 of 4
k‘l
0 > IT f 4-j' ' P
i r' Z iT rri
b sv
l m {ii In ff. m
frr
H H`•A 4 r a6 GN v .j` n f' z (' I.+ zez
411 al
VI
alw f1-1 ?1
, t r i .$ 11 Ft' (IN
0 N r N G a o 0 \c, N oz. 51
1 o 0 � °% ° a
a O 0 0 0 a 0 a o E 0 E 1` ~ 11
c.
•
r a + 1 J �' CCo 0 r A R ,• "
0 ( Q 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 C' 0 ° - j
• – _ — a Z
o ----- -_ C
WN w w st• 1 0o N w N O •. q -
co G c
1\' -J ifW CO -4 (A t .. Oo , T.
n
00 , _
• • ' W _ •Oa N ` 00 VI N ‘° N W -+O $ � J q 0 - O mof w
3r,p VI N _O O 0 :N .4o ;0 t, d 0 a VQ n
r a
-.__0_ 1tel O I VI O CsO I
(11
'+i m D .ice 1
0 •
w N N n
,--
E
0 W •.1 6W" °' vii p
rt
v�
� — � 00
b= vt � 1 I
m
%
fD
oa , J 0) CO 4. n to C.% 0 N ko v -4 -'
?tD W NW v zs.,1 y •D
•
�_ ...'1 6-s J b N 'p sS__ e -.3 0 cif .� Q m Z
m
t i
•r- I (p N
-
O
. ! \I; :
:(gI
—. - p
rd r'
N .
j % m 1
I O <
------ - 14 II -'.-
06 n:
-
M ` _ 1 N — --------- - e m `'a
ti)
X'.
W N N A
W
.o _ c
N
at ...., • n ..,, .... ... v i
N w w W c r :p Li J AI
$
0 r r 0 -P g r 00 0 3 ,;
N o0
--
0 -4e N WI
V1 00 ..P .p O W IN) s d0 – N 01 •R• n y
IN) W Oo U, – v� J 4 00 `.D y r
N W , CO N N O J -•1 0 OD Vl K 0 e
, A
571-6066
UBURBAN
6875 Highway No. 65 N. E.
3
�1 I NQINEERINai Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432
INC
si
—" 890-6510
N ¢, '' Civil, Municipal & Environmental Engineering 1101 Cliff Road
Land Surveying • Land Planning • Soil Testing Burnsville, Minnesota 55337
Aug. 12 ,1981
File S78085
SUMMARY OF PROJECTS COSTS
T.H. 101 TRUNK WATERMAIN EXTENSION - PROJ. 80-11
METHOD "A" & "B"
1 . CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT COST $172 ,568 .05
2 . CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES
Basic Fee $14, 323 . 15
Staking of Work $ 3 ,875 . 80
Other Services $ 2 ,134.00
Assessment Roll (Est . ) $ 2 ,500.00
As-Built Record (Est . ) $ 1 ,500. 00
$ 24,332 . 95
3 . CITY COSTS
Shakopee Public Utilities $ 5 ,975 .00
City Administration $ 1 , 760. 00
City Engineering $ 1 ,555. 00
Advertising $ 150.00
Bond Consulting $ 2 ,070. 00
Bond Printing $ 145 . 00
Bond Attorney $ 270.00
Moody' s Review $ 245 .00
Capitalized Interest $ 7 ,045.00
$ 19,215 .00
Total_ Add-On Costs $ 43 ,547 . 95
( =25 . 24% of Contract )
TOTAL IMPROVEMENT $216 ,116 .00
Page 1 of 4
Robert Minder,Reg.Eng. E.A.Rathbun,Reg.Suru. Wm.E.Price,Reg.Eng. Gary R.Harris,Reg.Suru. Peter J.Molinaro,Reg.Eng.
Wm.E.Jensen,Reg.Eng. William.1 Brezinsky,Reg.Eng. H. William Rogers,Reg.Suru. Bruce A.Paterson,Reg Eng. Daniel P.Johnson,Reg.Eng.
Kim W. Waldof,Reg.Eng. Robert Sikich,Reg.Suru. Peter J.Knaeble,Reg.F,..;_
8/12/81
c/ G
T. H. 101 TRUNK WATERMAIN -- PROJ. No. 80-11
METHOD "B"
ASSESSMENT RATE DETERMINATION
TOTAL COST 12" Watermain
Contract Amount $156 ,634. 50
Misc . @ 25. 24% $ 39 , 534. 55
TOTAL PROJECT COST $196 ,169.05
12" Rate 196 ,169.05
5068. 89 = $38. 70/Fr.Ft .
TOTAL COST 8" Equivalent Watermain
8" Equiv. W.M.Contract Amount $125 ,651 . 90
Misc . @ 25 . 24% $ 31 , 714. 54
TOTAL 8" PROJECT COST $157 , 366 .44
8" Rate 157 ,366 .44 = $31 .05/Fr.Ft .
5068. 89
Page 2 of 4
8/12/81
T. H. 101 TRUNK WATERMAIN - PROJ. No. 80-11
METHOD "B"
A. ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE
12" BENEFIT 710. 68 @ $38. 70/ft . = $ 27 ,503. 32
8" BENEFIT 4358. 21 @ $31 .05/ft . = $135 ,322.42
Total 5068. 89 $162 ,825 . 74
B. TRUNK AREA BENEFIT
103 . 37 Ac . @ $435 .00/ Ac . = $ 44,965 .95
C. SPECIAL SERVICES
3-12" Service @ $2 ,211 . 36/ea. = $ 6 ,634.09
8- 8" Service @ $1 ,457 . 32/ea. = $11 ,658 . 53
1- 6" Service @ $1 ,280 . 58/ea. = $ 1 ,280. 58
1- 2" Service @ $ 381 . 98/ea . = $ 381 . 98
Total Service $ 19 ,955. 18
TOTAL ASSESSMENT $227 , 746 . 87
Page 3 of 4
8/12/81 G
T.H. 101 - TRUNK- WATERMAIN PROJ. No. 80-11
METHOD "B"
Calculation for Assessemt Resolution
1 . Contract Cost $172,568.00
2 . Expenses Incurred
(Add-on Costs ) $ 43,548.00
Construction Total
This Project $216 ,116 .00
3 . Trunk System Costs
Area Trunk Charge $44,965 .00
Project Cost-pipe
only $196 ,169. 50
Assessed Cost-pipe
only (-) $162 ,826. 50
Balance = 12" trunk
portion of this project (-)$ 33,343.00
Future Trunk Costs allocated
to this Project $ 11 ,622 .00
TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENT TO BE ASSESSED $227 , 738 .00
Page 4 of 4
`� r ( ! fJT
of c? PAID in = nt
r ; tct. ? sc (..„ , ' t ° `� -r -r a
C' V R- ‘7. 1 A o
r r b ,
14 4 .,j J �! 'J J •.i �1 J J N N g 'I 0 y
I t , i ' \ , I i , .0 p _ 5. tt+
Iv
{0 pop CP W \0 p \c'i \A vs +o k.D — AQI o 1 VRI
C% 0 N r N '„\D ^ -O l,�i o N i— = Q o o v) 3.4
O 0 Q 0 F r _,
Q G 0 p o 0 0 0 0 �� _ m R D o
P yl v4 '� s- m -P, o�`' z
•
t 1
G 0 O O 0 0 C O 0 O o 0 a Q
c
0 C• w 7 W W N W N p 0 4 — I _,
kg o N oo 03 J ��,', (� J W CO N :n CA r 74
z _
f IS
d CA XIII , ; O
VI
a i Om N 0Os .. 6NWp ' `Z' o t:- 10
-- -- $ v - (! A
a. A N 7.-: -4 Ln
VI O t. SZO -P NI A hCo. v, ;.,.4 n 1- n! z L
— Q — O O O 11 0U O
o o U 0 n
111 VI W o N e co
N J — — --
1/40 et r
O N .R. ,n Q .p lik es
v1 in `� w
----- ------ 45, (\\l T
rr
TM
m i
ON h �. ^' n
O
W J OQ ° I cn C
J m
— CO
. s
1— o
-- _–._-..._..._—'—---- -----.-.--. _--- _._.—_ —.
1 66' 4' (J N W 0 J \o S. n1
Q N N 44. W CO 6. •' a � b
•Y) t7 (`) N 0 co .Nj b0 C 00 W cAi n c,
f n rrii
— -- CP -J a 12. — h C7p N
I -- -.._ � 1
a ,
N
rno
1
(A) cn00 .-
m
=1 ......
nj
cn
x m,
C., �I
'•a m
i
N c-4
OA � m,
t/t Cr.`
rA
Zr)
3
m m
� s
�_ _ •
_ iN
I NN
J
m cn
la
t j� VTC4 �'} v1 __ .-.-_.. i ,.: N -4 i ...
0 J 1 A N J . }I cN.► "' '
• O cn m +.
O NOZi v,
•--- oDN N N N O
—II
^..,
CitN _ N o !"JO s `O 43 O P (A —A v ' "'et p Q too Vi N ui t*
N r4Jo J ° Q z J
MEMO TO: John Anderson
City Administrator
FROM: H. R. Spurrier
City Engineer
RE: County Road 16 Utilities
DATE: August 17, 1981
Introduction:
Pursuant to City policy, whenever there is a change in construction projects,
such changes are brought to the attention of Council at the first opportunity.
Background:
When plans were prepared for the above-referenced project, an assumption
was made that the roadway followed a straight and uniformed alignment. When
the surveyors placed the construction stakes for the contractor, it became
quite evident that the road meandered within its apparent right-of-way.
Also, within this right-of-way are major Northwestern Bell Telephone conduit
and cable. Northwestern Bell's cable follows the meander of County Road 16.
The right-of-way which the City of Shakopee condemned and paid for and
acquired, does not meander and, therefore, in order to avoid the Northwestern
Bell Telephone cable, it is necessary to shift the alignment of the sanitary
sewer so that it is placed along the north line of the easement acquired for
this project. The affect is that there will be sufficient easement for the
construction of the sanitary sewer and watermain proposed in this project,
simply because the City has an additional 20 feet of construction easement.
However, reconstruction would not be possible within the present right-of-way
and, therefore, additional easement would be required. The City has emergency
powers that would permit the repair of those facilities in an emergency and,
therefore, it is recommended that no additional right-of-way be acquired at
this time.
Recommendations:
City staff recommends that no action be taken by City Council.
HRS/jiw
ovq,„e CITY OF SHAKOPEE
f5t/,;;,(t,„
129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 ^ `
n Y,
yy•
MEMO
•
John Anderson - Administrator
OM: Jim Karkanen - Public Works Dept.
BJECT: W. 4th Ave. - Adams St. to Harrison St.
IE: Aug. 14 , 1981
This memo is in response to your request regarding the maintenance
history of West 4th Ave. between Adams St. and Harrison St.
The Public Works Dept. was instructed by former Administrator
Doug Reeder in early May of 19r0, to cease maintaining this portion of
West 4th Ave. because the street had not been constructed to City
specifications or standards. Prior to these instructions, we performed
minimum maintenance to this street because of the poor grade of sub-
base material and lack of gravel base material placed by the developer
of this area. We did, however, do minimum grading during the summer,
and did snow removal to keep the R/W available for access to Adams St.
for the children in the area to walk to school.
Bo Spurrier informed me that in April, 1980, the Council had a
lengthy discussion about the R/W because of a conditional use permit
application in the area. I suspect that Mr. Reeder ' s directive to cease
maintenance on this street was as a result of the Council' s discussion.
Since that time, we periodically check the R/W to insure us that there
aren' t any severe traffic hazards or problems to any traffic which may
happen to use this R/W. The west end of this R/W has always been used
by the apartment on Harrison St. as a driveway entrance. The bituminous
surface is very thin and in a constant need of repair.
Attached to this memo is a copy of the consulting engineer ' s report
concerning the material used as a sub base by the developer.
•
•
•
April 7,1980
REPORT
1980 Improvements
TO: City of Shakopee
FROM: Suburban Engineering, Inc.
SUBJECT: 4th Ave. - Adams to Harrision St.
GENERAL
As directed, we have made this preliminary investigation for the construct-
ion of a local City street improvement on 4th Ave. from Adams St. to Harri-
son St. , including necessary storm sewer construction. In addition, a separ-
ate study was made to investigate the improvement of Adams St. to a finished
collector street. The report on the Adams St. investigation is included
with this report but may be considered as a separate project with special
provisions for modifying the intersection of Adams St. and 4th Ave.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The present roadway of 4th Ave. is a marginaI gravel. surface about 30 ft.
wide on 80 ft. wide right of way. The profile grade is minimal and slopes frc n
Adams to 41WrrisoriL Drainage is presently provided at a catch basin in tiee
southeasterly corner located off the roadway in a low area. The basis, is
connected to the trunk storm sewer on Harrison Ave.
r According to preliminary soils boring infornation
portions of the roadbed
is constructed on fill material in the vicinity of Adams and the suitability
•
for roadway construction is questinable on a preliminary basis. The natural. ,
soils are a silty sand and are considered acceptable for roadway construct-
ion. Additional soils data is necessary lot, ,Laal. design.,, "
For preliminary design purposes, "R" value of 15 was assumed which is
based on soft soils. %mall amounts of digVn ` AAterfals were found in the
sub-base materials.
1 ,--
cir _La_
- - EXISTING. CONDITIONS (con' t)
-----------____________
privewayS - for'the north entering apartment sites are not well defined and
provide poor control of cars entering or leaving the Street. Those driveways
are relatively flit so that drainage must be carefully considered.
DESIGN CRITERIA
Weliminary thickness design is based on present City -standards and
IMINIT standards The criteria used is a 20 year projected volume of 50,000
9 ton loads. The subgrade factor used is "R" 15 which represents the poorer
soils found in the soils investigation. The preliminary thickness designed
is 2" more gravel than a minimun construction standard of Shakopee for local
!
streets.
In the preliminary design,anew profile is proposed to meet the new profile
of Adams St. Other grades will be at City minimum grades and will match
adjoining lands as close as possible.
PROPOSED PROJECT
The proposed project will be a finished local street , 36 ft . wide with curb
and gutter and catch basins. Sanitary sewer and water main has been installed
previouslyili
ESTIMATES OF COST AND ASSESSMENTS
The detailed estimates of cost for the street, storm sewer and water main
.,
are included in Appendix A. The estimate of costs are based on available
? date of soils and ledge rock information and on what we expect contractors
i
to bid for such work in 1930. The cost estimates include an allowance for
,
administration, engineering, fiscal, legal and miscellaneous charges. The
estimated cost of the improvement is $75,840.00.
11
It is proposed to use the adjusted front footage method for street benefits '
1 to the properties abutting the improVement.
The estimated assessments for street is computed on the basis of a minimum
local street according to the City policy. The extra cost is proposed to
1
he paid from other street funds. Accordingly, the estimated assessment cost 1
is $62,475.00. The corresponding assessment rate for a minimum local street
, is $55.05/ft.
. I
i
.,,
i
i
7
i
2
) ,
4
i
4
r__ p RECEIVED
fr s ,I1i I
AUG 4 19 81 9
1-I I nihl CITY OF SHAKOPEE
LiJ league •of minrnescta cities
August 3, 1981
John K. Anderson
City Administrator
129 E. 1st Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear John:
I have enclosed a letter from Dave Kelso, Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency, describing the data we collected in Shakopee on July 22, 1981 .
I am sure that what is reflected in that data comes as no shock. I
too could not believe how loud it was standing on the street corner
in downtown Shakopee.
Hopefully, this data can be put to good use by your committees and
consultants as your planning progresses. Please let me know in
what ways the data proves useful to you - I like to track how our
information is used.
Sincerely,
,/j/Kath een Callahan
Noise Project Director
KC:cmt
En 1 :
f
;ill
" Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Kathleen Calahan
League of MN Cities
300 Hanover Bldg .
480 Cedar St .
St . Paul , MN 55101
Kathleen :
I have looked at the data we collected in Shakopee on July 22 ,
1981 .
As you recall we collected data at two locations : in front of
City Hall and at the intersection of first St. and Lewis for one
hour (1 : 30-2 : 30) . The intersection monitor was located 25 feet
from the centerline of the nearest lane whereas the City Hall
monitor was located 5 feet from the curb . Weather conditions
showed partly cloudy skies , 80 degree temperatures-generally a
nice day .
Some general observations were the fact that the roads are
heavily impacted by truck traffic and the obvious lack of people
on the streets . I believe the lack of people on the streets
reflects the obvious noise problem. I couldn ' t believe how loud
it was standing on the street corner !
The data shows :
L Intersection dBA City Hall dBA
max 92 97
1 85 89
2 84 88
3 83 87
4 82 86
5 82 85
6 81 85
7 81 84
8 80 84
Phone
1935 West County Road 62, Roseville. M nnesota 55113
Regional Offices DuluthBrainerd,Detroit Lakes ',4a•shall Rochester
Equal Opportunity Emplc,,c:
')7/
9 80 83
10 79 83
20 77 80
30 74 78
40 72 75
50 70 74
60 69 72
70 67 71
80 65 69
90 63 67
99 58 61
eq 77
The data (see attached graph ) clearly indicates essentially a
random distribution of sound with somewhat sporadic exposure .
The straight lines indicate a single source and the slope
indicates the variability of the source . I don ' t believe there
is any question that State noise standards are being exceeded and
that the source is primarily truck traffic .
Also , the monitor located in front of the City Hall shows an
almost perfect reflection of 3 dBA in the street corridor . This
amplification was also obvious while I was roaming around the two
locations .
I will not give an opinion as to what can or cannot be done with
the situation but suffice it to say that the downtown district is
incompatible with existing truck traffic noise .
Because of the strike here at the Agency I made my comments brief
and cursory so if you have further questions please give me a
call . I will not pass any of the data on to Shakopee-I ' ll leave
this up to you .
Sincerely ,
X,7rtt
Dave Kelso
Program Development/noise
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator ?°
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Quotation of Pending Assessments for 80-3 San. Sewer Service Lines,
Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Holmes Street Reconstruction Project
DATE: August 12, 1981
Introduction
The following is information relating to the quotation of pending assessments
for above project.
Background
The 80-3 Public Improvement Project (Holmes St.) is in two parts. The first
being Holmes St. Storm Sewer and second San. Service Lines, etc. After the
assessments for the Storm Sewer portion were adopted (Aug.26, 1981-Res.No.1670)
the Finance Department was not notified that there were to be further assessments
against this project. As a consequence, assessment searches quoting "no pendings"
for this project were issued. Some time later it was brought to our attention
that there were to be assessments for the second part of this project. At that
point pendings were quoted for all properties included in the original assessment
area. The date of this action is unknown. On 12/2/80 we received the actual
list of pending assessments for the second assessment. To this date we are aware
of only one instance where the property has changed hands and the new property
owner has come forth stating that the assessment was paid and that no pendings
were quoted. It is, however, unknown as to how many more there could be as it was
not, at that time, a practice to maintain a copy file of assessment searches.
On 8/11/81 this matter was discussed with the City Attorney who affirmed
that the information provided on an assessment search does, in fact, create a
liability for the City.
Alternatives
1. Abate assessments on claims as they arise that can be verified.
(In order to verify the claim we would require the escrow holder,
title company, etc. to provide written proof of assessment search.)
2. Abate the assessments as claims surface and can be verified for property
that has changed hands.
3. Stand pat and see if owner, or other party, pursues litigation over
the assessment.
Recommendation
Alternative number 2.
Reason: It was an error on the part of the City and would be an ethical
solution to the situation thereby avoiding litigation claims to be filed against
the City.
Action
Request Council move to endorse alternative number 2 whereby the City of
Shakopee would abate the assessments as claims surface and can be verified for
property that has changed hands.
GV/ljw
(ft
JEROME JASPERS & COMPANY
Cern/led %jubhc 7/ccoun/onls
206 St OTT STHF:F:T
%II WO RN 111 I III 5%11.141('AN I\Fllll IF OF 11IAKOI'F:F:,511'9,4901A 55379
I I 14 11311 11 I'ti 1'1.1( A('(MIN IAYIS TF.I 'HONE:(612)44S-2317
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
City of Shakopee
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
We have examined the financial statements of the various funds and
account groups of the City of Shakopee, for the year ended December 31,
1980, and have issued our report thereon dated May 28, 1981. Our
examination was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards and, accordingly, included such tests of the accounting
records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary
in the circumstances .
We also performed tests of compliance with the Revenue Sharing
and Antirecession Fiscal Assistance Acts and Regulations as required
by Sections II .C.3 . and III .C.3 . of the Audit Guide and Standards for
Revenue Sharing and Antirecession Fiscal Assistance Fund Receipients
(Guide) issued by the Office of Revenue Sharing, U. S. Department of
the Treasury and compared the data on Bureau of Census Form RS-8 with
the audited records of the City of Shakopee, as required by Sections
II .C.4. of the Guide.
Based on these procedures , we noted no instance of non-compliance
with the regulations and no material differences between the data on
Bureau of Census Form RS-8 and the records of the City of Shakopee,
for the year ended December 31 , 1979.
94-2
Shakopee, Minnesota
July 22, 1981
- .IEROME JASPERS & COMft N'Y
(7or/ijic'd 7-public "3ccuunlan/s 1
206,COfl ,rw F:F:I
Nil NMI R.IIF'1141 AS11 RI(A\I'..l Ill 1.IIF ,IIAKoPI:F.,MI.\\F.,IIU 55379
(I KIIIII-.It VI'IN II %('I Y II'\IA\I, July 31 , 1981 IF:I.t.ill(t\F.:I 612)445-2017
Members of the City Council
City of Shakopee
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
MANAGEMENT LETTER
Dear Council Members :
As we stated in our engagement letter dated October 27, 1980, an
examination would be made of the accounting and other records of the
City of Shakopee, for the purpose of expressing an opinion on your
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1980. We also
stated in our letter that at the conclusion of our examination, we
would make separate recommendations for strengthening internal controls
and improving operating procedures . We have now completed the examin-
ation of _your financial statements and, at this time, make the following
recommendations to you.
1 . FIXED ASSETS OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
We recommend that a detailed physicial inventory of the
fixed assets be taken, which should include -
a) description of property
b) location
c) date of acquisition
d) original cost
If the date of acquisition and original cost cannot be
determined, then they should be estimated. This in-
ventory should be updated at least annually to account
for additions and dispositions during the year.
Advantages to the City of this project would be -
a) source of information for insurance purposes
- b) source of information for budgetory purposes
c) source of information for use in matinenance
and safe-keeping.
- . 1
Management Letter
July 31, 1981
Page 2
2 . DIVERSIFICATION OF DUTIES
A diversification of duties regarding the area of cash
receipts, bank reconcilations, recording of transactions
to the accounting system, and the depositing of receipts
in the bank account, is not presently incorporated.
While this is always a problem in offices with relatively
few employees, we believe the following recommendations
may improve the internal controls in these areas -
a) the recording of transactions to the
accounting system should be performed
by a person unrelated to collection of
cash receipts and bank deposits .
b) monthly bank reconcilations should be
entrusted to a person unrelated to the
preparation of checks, cashxeceipts and
bank deposits, and the recording of
transactions to the accounting system.
3 . PURCHASING SYSTEM
We recommend that the City review its purchasing system
for goods and improve upon the system by either central-
izing the system or reorganizing the current system such
that the department heads report to the administration
and the accounting department when an order is placed or
received. A well organized purchasing procedure is
important to the City to insure that -
a) the goods are actually received with a
written evidence of delivery.
b) that the goods were what were ordered
and paid for.
c) that the prices paid for the goods were
no more than those shown in the related
purchase orders, bids and/or contracts .
d) that all discounts were taken.
e) that such purchases were not paid for
more than once .
f) that the purchases were charged to the
proper appropriation accounts .
Management Letter
July 31, 1981
Page 3
3 . PURCHASING SYSTEM - continued
g) that no expenditure was made in excess
of the balance to the credit of the
appropriation account to which it was
chargeable .
h) that the accounting department and the
administration have data available
regarding outstanding orders and will
be able to report to the City Council
commitments made, along with the
commitments already paid for at given
reporting intervals .
We will be pleased to discuss these recommendations with you
further , if you so desire .
We wish to thank you for the opportunity of serving you and we
look forward to an enjoyable and continuing association in service
to you.
Yours truly,
JEROME JASPERS & CO.
JEROME JASr44(
V
JJ/gw
4 ,
C:19<)
N' • • N N N'. N N 'N • N. N N N N N N Nn) N • N • N N N N • )
N • - N :V N: N N N • N! N N IV N.NJ N N, 'J N)• • N • N N N N * •ti1 '1 .i
a * a O a' O•a a • a A aa a • a s a a a a • ',I = A
.7 • '. .a 4-1! t .3.,:) J * 1. Pt .) 3..3 3 1' ♦ • C,1 4 . '3 •. r .n r v
N • (A (.1 4: 1 J�'�• (A • :V. N nJ :\)N:N:J V. N. 1, • N • • _ P ''
N' • V - 0T NUI a • V1 C' T 02Tcr. TiC :.,1 a • r • a a a a • x l
z -4
O 1
.
7 l
•J aJ(- Cl C3 C. ....11 '"1 S C. 'l.i C_ -I - U . L n C. D
^�' b 9 :AI J):CO t 021 lb 'L Y .11:37 b a. .1' b b '.b 3 b tD Co -4 L)
\ \ \\I \144 \ \: \ \\\,\\\, \, \ '. \\ \,\ \ f'1
N ' N N NI N N N 7V. N N I-U IJ-IV ,J IJ. N, N N N N N N :V A
\ \ \\- \,\ \ \; \\'\\i\ \\. \I \, \ .4 \ 44. .. \ U
A A A= )3.21 CO' m! A D A 03 CO A 07' Al A .0 b A A A CO T
.+ r 0 0.1 r r r N r r P•0.4-4...1-4! r l I..1 r r 1.I-r • r 1'1
ri
! '
i •
N' r• 0
7s N ••• :n a' • C
• ..� 2
N NI Na'U' 1 :A 0, r/-' W c N as -i
•
W W 4 0 U r.0 0,0 r r 0• J a UI UI a .- ...r .0 .0 r r 1 4.-N ON .. ..,
N- ILA
a ;N 0) J1 A A:u NIN N NI (Jl U11r -.4 V -3 N.-' T LA, T T --, --4 N,-,4 (1100 ,0 ,0
• '• • • • • ' • • •• • • • • I • • I • . • • • • • : • • I • • • , • • • • •
1 'a a N N C3I a0a 010 .d 4t 0 J(A ... L4 '../I NN) -d -1 44 'L'1 (.11 U1 UI 0 C)0 30 •0
- "•11 N N N:7! aoa '1ICJ • h3 NI J 04.- -4 ,0 a a -1 NUI N UII .> G a O .]:)u UI U1 .
1• • * •I • I • • I • • • •
•
1 I
Co •
•
D C.C. '.
i C'a x C. Ds '0 ala a 0 71Ia
i ! I a D D D D Cl
a ace NN Is • (' cacc,cCC; N NI A . . . .
-1 P 2 21 ti)'VI 'A D -4-.4 -l'4 --4 --4I -1I N! 2 I ,l 'It r 1'1 P
-i 22' 00 'C 2. 0000000! rl
0 ., A A A
'1 � 9 • nA 2 I
MI n� I (9 ..«-*.. • 2 < •
A x xi • • :D rn' n n n en in Ani '711 Pr! N n n n n Cl
-c - A • • 1 2 2 ,• ,''l rn rn MUM rn 11 01 D' D D D D N 2
C MM • D 2222!222' Al .4' 2 2 2 2 2 D 0
_ -4 00' nn lis 2' -4-4, 4 .1--4..4 1, OI rn D ' -- O
2 0 22'. Z2 '� O• ;C' AAAAAAI 0 A Z " Z3 .y. -�
N 00, • • 'r ,'D. D D a D D D D- 1'I; 0000 -t n
rn rn MM nn -4 (1, rrrrrrro: a. Z '-1 -41 -I -4 D
r A A 0 0 C! fn ('1 • . . • -I 11
I N ti z z • IA 1A/n(A 0)CA(n P+, v I Cl
n ct 0 -4-4 C C C C.0 C C: A' 3 ' = 200 o 'C
n -1 22 AA 1 'V 'L CT;b TT • is aD D D z
• 73 • • TC A'U:9 T S r - ZZZZ A
r r r rlr r r' - x x JC x 1`1
n •
LSI
. 1
Z)
M f'1 A-i n 2 ..1 C< <c'c rn en c T Cl T.+ T .r ;
a nz nI- -. A. mrnrnf•Irnp3. r T. c a zaz Cl -4
C C 2D 130 = a' 2 2 2 2 2 C D =
"•4 0 < .•. C) r1 <. • • • • • .4 r • n •. .-1 rn 1'-1 rn n 2
a Co Orn -i• A Ct 13r I 'O 2Az A
• rr n r 33323. 3 -4 • 010C . O
v) rxno
D 2 1n CA 11
3 rn i > A rn 3 0 •- 0 3 D-i D -1 Co N
n n P X r a x- Z Z Z Z Z a a z D 0 O O (1
V 2 2 T '0 -•-1 -1 -1.4.4 r' -i 3 .- rn -0 rn T A A
z z en rn C -1 I') • • . • • z • D 2 ZDZa 44
.. .1 OZ P-• 2 1T 1 - -4- 'C A Co
• • 2 0) Co N (A P P P P-P. C. P r • 2 3 11 -+
TM • P r rn A! 37 '?I f'1 T f•1 0 4.
A 74 • A A C A A'A a rI A: P+ P rn 2 rn 2 D o
A < rn rn rn P511 3 1'11 D rn-i rn -1 Cl 2
A A r 9 A •9 A!T A a• 'O! r 'D 00)0) 01 1'1
CI 1'! 0 n • • • • :• rn N' • • N 11 •
t *J • r 'D m I '3
(o I GI i
") o t7.11 63'.7 ;O OI O'0 0 Oto O o! OIC. 0 N N a a 7 D
r r rr, rr 'r r. •••• I-.r r!r.-r' ! r+ r r rr NN r n
1 1 11 , 1 1 .1 I- 1 1 1 1'1 1 1 , 1 1 I I '1 1 1 1 • 1 Cl
a a a a' a s a a• a a a aIa a aI 4•1 a a 04. 400 a 0
N N WW, ON W 4: N N N N.N N N I N: N N 0000. '0 C
4 C.+ 20 W. 1-.4 r W. W (4 W'.W 4 N, '144I a' W r r r r a 2
c a Ca' Po.P. N n' N NNNNOU1i Nj r o N6-.Na. o• -i
I 1 1 I, I 1 '5 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • I 1 1 1 1 1
T 0. r r, .-r r r 0) a W W'W a s 0, a C' ,0 .0 A V6 as 2
") N NN.) ) OD N N N N4N1-N N N N N r r ."r -' 0
r r r r r N N r r 1 I+133 r P.' r• •RI r r r r r r •
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1
T I..., - rr N N T a WW W A 01• a - F ArJ .' •.
I: f' N N 'L 2 4 W "J N4N r P.)N N N I: . r r r Z
C
VI r N •
T 02 'p
0, N: CA IV .,
T til .. A
A V 1
• r
O N
• Co
' 3 I-'
• 2
(n A
69 D
• ♦ • • • Li n
• • • • n F'
• • • • 6)
• 1 I I I Cl
n n n n n
x x x x x
N N. . (A N V). r
-7-7,-7--!:;-:-.,-.7--,',,,,,-----,__ ___ _17
_7
1
___ __ I
._. -, )_S � • ,a- , _ a - .. � 1771 � �_. , o , - _ _.__.� _.
1 '
4
N • NI • N • N N t)N N N:N •• IJ'r N N)N; • 'J N • rJ N • N V fV N
.N •' N' • N • N N N3•N.1 N N'N •• IN);N3 N N• • N N• • N N • N N Nr N: A D •
a *1 a: • a • a a .4i a ala ♦ ..0.-0 a 1 * a A * A A • A A a• A- X f
,.D •' .0. • .'0 •• :D 33,13.10 D fD• D • vi�1 w -1' • C. T • T as ♦ JI c11 CN i.) A • )
(3) •! "/ • 4 • N N N N"J N.N • NIN N N. • 77. 5 • .• -3 • W W CA. IV' 7C A
i f O O
•
:J. .7.: 0 c..G C) C:I._. c-.1.-:..1 O .3' C, c::J •.9. 0. a
.D 'b. b i0 32 0'2:D Wr D .v;CO 'D CD S 1 'D • 3 33 'D 2. ;D, -4 V)
\ \ \ '\ \\,\\\r\ • \i\\\. j \'..... \ • \ I ' \.....i \. .1 2
✓ r' r .-•r.• r••r'r r!r I+r: I.+r- w- r .+.+.-I r
N I IV
IV r.,3 N IJ r N N N,N • W1N N N. IJ N N N I 'N N Ni NI 7C
\ \ \ \\\.5' \ \.'4 \I\\\i I \ \' \ \ I \\ '-I 5, O
S 'p 1 L :303) 000I30 331.7) 33 sI I D'. .0 33 30 .0 .0! .0' "J
j n
•
a
•
~t , I.
C
1 2
a01
a r U1 a (..41(..(..41(...4 Na '-
1 •••• N 1 N a a i I 1
�I%ti I 03 13' .'S .0 (Al 3
I.O '131 04(Al .•IUI Ica N O (A G
a .J .• iCT'• r•(AI .1 a
N`N • N N W W LP 1r 0( A'VI .O.OIJ 73 A,Q. .0 -.1 1-1-•GI a a �►+)+ 11 J vl d CB
• • • r• • • • • • •• • • �• • • ' • • • • • � • • 1
010 Q. 0+ I'S UI IX;0 o 0 tO J Ci ut '1 VII V1 N VI 0 0 0' I.O .O Id-4 N.�i U1.OI N 04 i
'Di!� DID S D O'J:7 '3'.17 C7 CD J O O Cl 0 0a•�1 .O .D j.0•a r-• J•.WI 0 •V I
1 1 .1 , I I
•- • • •- • i * 1 • I• •', • I
I
I
A • A• A A A All A Mc, air,0 0i 11i CD CO co m 3I 9,• .
r- -r 0 a a n a a a a .•I.•.•.,-. S 2' 3 , 3 Cl l 1 r•11 a
a a, r 1 3:13 13 1'11 ala n a' 0 0' . -t •3 3 0, 1'
i U m !+1 rn.rt rn m I-11 2,Z 2 Z 1 3 3 Ia i a rn m R$I -•'
Cl) .r •• N V)V).V1 V)V) (1) Cl',Cl r11 Cl a ai I 2 2 2 2 2; Cl, G
2' 2 .9 H.•ti•M r•^. I N N Ito!A Cl)I 3 r')
1 I ri C C C C C C C (I) N V)N i 3 a 1 <' 2
,'L 1 VI N N'N N(./)(.4 • • • •
G � ! 0 61 II
C • = 0
2 0 a a a a a l D. D S C m. S '9 2 D 2 3
1 r +) 0 :) ca 47 .1 . ."1're f'1 111: ( 3 p I'1 A
.-, r r'trnm II CC CC' I 0 r1:-0 0 _
2 V) 2 z 2'2 2 2 2 A A A C)' C C , A a ; • rn
n I AAAAAAA TT T2' 22' 0 -1 •+. C')
Cl
l Clm• 0 11 I 2 7C
Z • r r' C CA A
m
N 1 -4
0
Cl•
.
71 C CN 0110 0000' V1-• 0 3 OG� 0,
1 U C
: C •-.
7.1 3 D Cl Cl m N) 1113 Cl 1'-1-1-1, A S A 0 mmm Cl• -4
•
SSSA202 2212. I a O a 222 2- rn
z z z • • • o• • 13'\ rn re re rt, O C C o m i n or • a
..• - CO \.r 3 3 3 3: O m 2 3 3 3.
.. w IN Q• N 1A IA w r r CJ .r a s a 3 0
Z Z Z 0 a 3'"9 3: N N a r r r a Cl
0 0 0 fnmm rn•••O 3.333 Cl --4 .. Cl)
0 0 0 0 r-• 0 0 0 0 w x 1 '"1 V)rA 0 2 A
00. cri 71,11 T T' 1 x.. 3 CCC' 1• 3
?•
is 'jO •C-1.-•1.. H 7J,... • • • • A m -•• 1 -1. X • 1-"
3 x A 13 X 9. X 2 0 Z 2 a 1 1 1 1
I n (1 m • • • • ..Cl) 0'V)N CI) Z 0 -1 r C- r r a' -4
"1 1 1 Z.• in Cl Cl rn' -n r'1 • r) *5 .• .. ••
:a a .D .+-4.. 1.1 V) - 3'3 3 3. • f'1 r'I IT. 3 0
0 0 0 2 2 2 z• •c:C < <'. C v)co c1 re 2
p J 0 Cl) M V). Cl) •-•'H I-1.4 a ,
• • • • • • • 0'A r1 0 -'• •
r1'.m r1 re•• •
(A.IA N V)! '
;:1 G 3 0 0 0 0 J I Ci • 1--i 0 J J. 0 O 3 O 'N O UII a a
r 1 . Ull r.+r.• I r►+' .+ r VI r r i )'• A 1
I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 11 1 I ' 1 I I I I I A •
a a a a a a a a a'a a,a A a ' a a' a a a A li 1 O
cm Cl.. W W W W W G W<w UPGA W W W W rV N N N 45) N. C
1.31 U7 U1 34 0'0 0 01 0•'0 r'r r r-• .D W'. a A N N NI u. Z
H r r N N NIN N 1+'.7 0 i 0 N U1' J 0• W O A-'3 of N: 1
1 1 I 1 1 1 '1 1 1 1 III 1 , 1 1 • 1 1 .( 1 11 1
G. UI. a •a0 A a-a W.0,'D 1-,N.•r CA CA. 0• a ►'CA~" a' Z
r- r .r N r'r r 0.,o. .0r%) -• r r•-•• N N 3 N SI N C
,G r'r•.- r ....- 3' .• a r P-• r • •
1 I I till 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 r.
.. A 4.1 .0 O A•a W.0 ,d •r- fJ r W W 'J• a r W.' 0
r N r- NJ...F-'.•..'.. .C1 N) -I .- V r N f'1 r T N:D N L
• C
a a,
'., a -/ 3 1
S N r
O N
• n .•
S
f1 13
V1 a
• • • * • • • (1) .1
* • • • • * • a m
• * •• •• • • Q)
1 I I I I I I r1
A, A .C7 A A A C)
2 2 X 2, 2 2 r 7(
Cl) (4 Cl) In V) N ,V) i IV
I
_.__._1-7.-,":1-7-7-,--
_-_ ..-
- 'I 1 V a d •a .-
r
•
NNN NIN N N N I. N N . N • (J • •J N N NJ N N N NJ N • N N • NJ • —
N N(J NI.NJ N N.N • ^, N, • N • N • N N N N rJ NJ") N iJ • N N • N • n u) -
.- r —'r—'r
0000,000.0 • 00 • a. • a • 00000000 O * a O • a '.D 2.- .-•_ ' • r r r IP r • r• • ......r r r r. ♦ II r
A b .D .D'CD n C'�D •. -..-d *. u` • W • 1M G C41.4(A(.W4 (A N) • r •• U • C1
r....r r.••rrr • , • •D • a • .J •.. ,:1 . c•0 Cl .() • 0, A • * x 0 e
2 -
O •C
i • .0
1
_ _ - ;o c.....2 O.:]01C. G Cl 0 " D.
3.
'o[n 0 MNO :D (D(A T,CD Al'.. .D 'CD:D OD 9 ']0 .D!CD.a OJ O :n .bl -4 UI
\\\\)\\\\ \ \ \, \ \\\.\ \\.\\ \ \ \ \' Cl 2
rrr*.,P+r r r P..** r r ;rrr'rrr`r r r r m 0... e
N N N N,IJ N N N N N N N N N N N N N;n) N N I N 'N N. x
\\\\ \ \\\ \.\ \ \ \ \\\.........,\\ \ \ \ -I O I
T J2/A 02:0 9 'A .A • M 0 A, C "D a 9;..lo Jt) O4.13 A i .A 9 ;S Ai "17
r r r r.-'r-'r r'r r P. r r r..... r I r r 4-4 Cl a
M
. 1 I
>
3
0
r r t 1.414.
r C
• • • -'- 1
2
a' -' I o .0 - 1.44 r N1 I 1 0;0 7I '(
UI.11 N O'N N N N NNW no - r aIN (7114 r N1a r r a-a 0'0 a a,
N W UI O)O UI n JI N .JI V -4 -4 .0 O .. - W S!a r 07 iN W 'N N U ,.0 ala 1 W W I
• • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • '• • • • • • '• • '• • • • • S ! O OI i 1
a •7,a a'...) O ,.
a•7 a I 1,0 •
,7, •1 r, C D W D -J'. a o o T ''UI UI o 0� I
7 6)C2ic1 'J Cl12 ,j 0.0 I N N. <a a , a O) N:U 07 0•::7 O a a _r - O'('' I -4-41
.
0000'0000 Mil m m OOO�bOaDO O L 'n n' I i
....� Cl n 'c C C CCC c c C I •C I t 'DI
• •7•
7P 40,040. 7. 00 . rL A A Clm A IZZ2ZZZZZ • m r 10 =1 i 1
y 0 Cl z 2 z Z 2 2 Z 2 '9 :.-•
S 2 2 2,2 S L 2 -• -1 1 ...... w 1 Cl 1 C ;CA n' <
A Cl .2 2 2'Z 2 7'2 2 1 2 I 'N 1-4 -4 n
0000,0000 22 .-. • �'C)C) C)Q7 oa1O61 1
b7ala7f11a7a7aD D )> -1 O .0N0I )VI0V)(/) I (n s .z -71 0
2772'2272 -1 -4 72272 • 'O .•i O
y y y y 1 -/ .cocam0000 O D m I
s o n A-D D D R 4.4
0 0 ClL L L i C L'C C m
-. -, z ' m mmmmmmS • Cl •
aO'.
. m 2 • • • • • -. • Cl n
00000000 • ^m Cl :n 1-
22222222
-
22222222 71 -71 Cl m >,
C c N r• -4 Cl
r r -4 ..
c
' •-4
m
A
DO DD )ae su Az I 0 3mmmmmmm Cl m m 0 -+
33333333333333.13 -4 -1 Cl --. . 7a2222222 2 Cl A c m
M 072 ' 900 0 rm 3 0 r(+Immmmmm m D n r, S
• • • • • • • • z A - A r A A A A A A A A Cl 2 A
C1 rI n A Ia7a DDD 7a D • 0
r)
00000000 (n a Cl �rrrrrrr r Cl In
...........1.......o........ .-. a-4 r C 0 n
V) m 00000000 V) A 0 B A
NNNNN M V)V) ClG ,A
M rcCCCCcc c 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A Cl ..
00000000 is ` aMM MIIMM -0 n A -1 ro
NyV)NNNNN -4-4
D bT:• ]a laOno 1 r crrrrrrr Cl 1^' 11 • -"
rrrrrrrr ,1m c z .. 0o ..
m2 0 nmmmmmm1'1 !'I r P 0m -4 A try NIVIV7000 (n
N N m 0 Cl 33
(1 N Cl
• 'm .
V) •
c, 4.4 7.0 a _.2 C ' NUI O' a O•O o..00!Oa 7 4.1 O G n
I-r r 0.4a r r r a s •- r rrr r rrr r . r •' r
4 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 I 1 1 Cl
a a 0 410'0 a a 0 041 a a 00000000 a a a 00
4 4 4 W W 4 u W 0+0' N N N N N N NN'NJ N N t'... .O N
C
-(V d V V -I V . mm N N N N NNNNN N N r a u
Nr r N UI0cA00000 o Cl O a� -.
(.+uuuuuuu 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 I 1 i 1
1 ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a a 0+ 00) 0.(.(.-r 0' r a' (A 2
-1 NA 0. 0' a W W r r r - NJ N c.9 N N r N 27 V r 3" N 0
O. N N rN N r C r r r N r 1 r r -' r r r
14 3) r r r I
II I t I I I ..
V 'TC, +T O W(..M ,n 43mm a a0� NNi-eo cm cm (.arr T y u
r n)�.r N N r.r r r r N N UI N N r�.�D V r r r) 2-
<G
Cl . C) •
a
u
N a a p
O -' TO I
O N
• m
a -'
2
M 7
0 )S
• • • • • •• • B Cl
•. • • • 1 I I - CI .
1 I . I I Cl n, n
An'. Cl n x x: x •
3; 3' 71 7C N o, 0 u
y. N'. N U7
a .1, v=_.._i aI . - .. ) > •, .•, .• _ , 9 i' {—_'J-- _c' . a__� v - , A a . _. A a . .I-r" —_
1
•
N v N N
• N • ': •' r.) • N • N * N N :� N N1
Iv. n) • N N ••
, -•.
• N N • N N •I N. • N N. • N • N N NI NI,N.)N * N N •, N, A .J
• # a • # P •' a, • A a a • A a a' a'.A A • A A • e' 3 D i
• N • N * ,N N •i N • • N N • N • N N N. N N)N • ✓ •-- * •+: i'1 •+ .
• (0 N • •(d (1 •I (A! • • 3 • •.3 'n-3 .. • D 3i •• 9 C) . \
• # u • :,J •D s, •- • . .a • •n .,9 cA• e,a A • C. Zr . "' X Cl •,
I
O IT
r., a 10 l0 I c. c ca. o O c, c), 010 C) I..3 c I c, D
(D m 2 A • S' :D •D' A I y 115 "D' ml:n W CO as :b •. !N
N• % N. N. IN&..',i ti's IN - SI •
rl x
•-• r it .r ! r, r r• p.• r- r sIr-• Ir r I r, p
N N N N N. N N I N I•„•N N NI Ni IN N • IN N ! N' R
A 5) - :.A ,A • A, Si D. .PIAA A, AlA A .A A S'. .'
r -• 11+ •.• /+� •+p+ •+ I 1....r Ir. /.+1 r•+ I-. 1+ - , :rn
11ia
• I
I II I I • p
I l
I • I I I 0
1 I I C-., i -
IN N '1.4 F+..+ i N N, 'P N N. (b 00 ()I N N F-• I•+ ►+II+ 0141!
.O.O 0. 0( T1 0• 0•'0) O• T i 4 0 41 # # d N N N' 4 01 N 0 T T 0 0 P u i
• • :• • • • • • • • I I• • • i• • • I• • • , • • • • I • • • • • • ,
N 1+ 0' (.74 • r+1.+ 010 I O 01 O•r U11 P a OI tJl U).01 •N•+I IT•
N I P P O O A i)•
.NN •U ••-3 - (ARA 010 OO' !0'1+auINN 000,al 00 F•1•+CO ,0 '2 C.)10 G, JI I
,
• • II •I • ;• �• • { * •1 •1 • I
!
1 i
L L ••- .. -.i T T! T r r r• 'L x 2 IG) 1Q) I G)!
C O 2 s, ! Pr PI D Cl Cl ClDDD ! 10 I I
a S -. <n D,. 2 E I < .3 a.3, 7DI 7,A 12 i. I )S I
A z r -4 o! 2 21 0 ! 0 0 01 21 2 2 r 'S
<n • n I rn rnI m « <I ol 0 0 0 fin I t
O 2 I 70 2 2 2 2 N 170 f1
V) 2 S -4 i V)N: I It I xl N U) (I) 2
n
C I
'1.1 9 A ti N NI I C !C C CI 2,3 2 I I •-o 3 O
,.l -. < "1 7C R' I A I V) N NI 010 0 '> j .. A
a 1.') I Ca) Cl rIrn .n ! C'L C -4 1 -4. n
✓ V) --I r r' v ri
I 2 JO A' rni rt rn Cl s, I
t rn -1 --, r r I I ..r •1• • .a rn
rte- x .33 0 < <, I Cl I x x x I 770 c x
C n 0 I Dl D D C I2
O iC 212 2 N f7 I A
rl 7c17C 7C '7C 'Ci
' I 1 .'n
• 1-1
I , 11
O G) Cl 0 0 r•l N rn I G) O C7, fn'G1 G) Cl' '.< 0 -.
Cl a o -. n 0 2 0 ri rn Cl 2•rn Cl ,O Cl n -1
2 0 C I 0 CD• C 222' D•22 'C 3 A Cl
r) crn -•r• ry r1 Cil rNrn rl ,,-• • x 3
73 z 'V 77 ft, t r v 73 73 ZII r- A 31 7
q . • • DDs• Ds • 2 0
✓ v) ' P -I, rrr -r.rr s 0 n
3 z 2 0 3 0 1 r. -, (l ,
O 3 n o '. 0 0' D N co NI O.N N .D 2 Cl) n
C D .. T A '-.I -'• C C C., r C C '5-. -4 ' :L7
-9 •• z 3 2 Z vv
13 . 0 17 2 • .3 •-•
'D 2 -1 17 -4 13, -4 '.9 13'91 •91 t 13 -• N '
Cl . N I • C r r r' C'r r • P o-
m Cl. 77 -.04 4-41a1.+-. Cl I-,
r) w A Cl• P f), P rl r9 1'P non in jp 'A 0
Cl) 3 < I N(Art
NI Z(n N 1 fl 2
-1 Cl C) rl N I rn V11 Cl •
• 'V r1 .3 r1' 1 'D I• NI I
• rn • til!
I
I
s 'a :r1 CC J a O. ,7 (A N 1.111 co,0 0 0 O nr C' ,
I-. -. 1•• -+ -- r(.•, - 'co 33 0 1....•4 r •"' r U) C) ,
I I I 1 ) I 1 '. 1 11 1 1 1, 1 1 1 '1 I n
a a a a a a a: a i#P Jr, P'# a A 'P A. J
N N N L+ (..- N N'. N 'N N N N.N N N N CA C
N A U -- 47 U N: (w • N N N' N,N N 41 CM -•• •Z '
O (A c'- U) .0 0 N: I O I O O a' 0 o 0 o N 41. -1
1 I I 1 I • 1 I I ' I 1 1 1I I I I I
0' A Cr a T(A• 0 •N N()! T T 0. T a -+' z
• CP N A N(.1'. LA r r-..• N.N N) 1) N W' J
✓ r I+ a r r r r a 4 N •••.N- -+ a •
1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I
0` a a, a no T 4 17• a e a 0` T 0' .T a 1-- •.
H '„'1 N •- e N r• (^ -+-••+ N.N N N. N CV 2
1..4 C: 0' -- 0' •
J V C) (A
.F 0, - 1 a a •
.p r 0A c, I (J1 03
0• 5 O .0 .1 V 1
UI N • --
O N
I • 1
' 2
a -•
2
I r• v
I N D
• • • • • • * • Cl) f:l
• • • *• * • • • * P. p h1
• • • • • • • •. C)
1 I I I I 1 I - 1 . Cl
A A OI n (-) C7 A ClI ,
•
7C 7! I1 x I 3 I ' lc'
v) • N N' N CO)• N N (o l a
•
_•'— _ _ eI 3.0. , aaa . . •-. a : aa .as —� -- . Cn'.uu • Av -0A .) aa ..u .-1
I , .
IC-- ,
• N • N •• NN N • N N N • N ..
•
N N rJ • N N • N • N • N N N • N N N, ► N rn 'V
N • N • N N N • N N • F S `n
• N • N ♦ F F • F • r
♦ A • F •� F P a • V • � • NNN s N N fJ. • NJ '�
N). L.NJ a • -• r • n. ci
• U • L. ♦ N N N • .i) • .al • m OD D • = t .7
• rA • N •• •
A v • ,J • .( • D iL D ♦ • N
O <
O
I p T
n OI. n, 3 .A j.n A Iy OD X, --I 2
m. .D •
I \ \ \. o
r.• rNJ NI Ni NI N no Pa[NJ N iN N Ni I N
N. \ 1 \. \,\ A ,D 'J3'0 A b A y: f'1
W D: miD 'D1 G � rl-•r� r
I• • 1
o1
•
I • 4
o.•'. 1 . . :.n u F
I r.d,,.D I 1 ` N N i (A 4.1 a F 9 .i m ''UI:
'(AG ' FBF j UWI UI LAIN) .4,1-46 •+r I- - I N,N ; N•+ dU J).A (11 N • •
UIa:11 • • •. • : • . N I • • , • • I UI rA 1 •L'0)U a' ioo i
.G'•'i .1 N 0�'. a.41 NI UI U1i N NI I0 0 U U -.I Nt ICA •d o10 o 01 1
�; j•
* • I * * I ii i '
• I
ritr xxx x
r s s; r Ir ala a o
a 2 •• -I,
s- aI a! 2 to r,. ,a a a r')
A r O' 73;72 Ai O'i m 1 I.. A 1 ',y(n V) 2 <
XI r. r 7r)'z I 1 v) Z I A 2 m
r� s. Oio a� m' y I oio 0 .ca s s 2 Z
x �.a
z y: 2 ...1 "m m rn In 0
-1 0 9' y'y 2r p ram.•a•, H .� A A -4 7 T
r� -n I 2 2 2 '. 7- X 2 in
:n p O C •n 1 -'� < o n
C n,n c,, -0 a a a x
-i 2o•o2 G. m I yNN ZZ2 a
< 2,2 (a77 • 1 C C C ••.0.2 2 0
N'. ..•1..• (iv 1 -a '0 1) m
71
a!0 'ti""011 Z22co
o,o I r r r ooc ..
. r;r . <'< < v)
,1
s
o o o r r r
o m ►+r m m m. c m G C) co m Cl "' -4
'-• 2 C .3 2 2 2 ca cc a) s
z („ o zo aan
2 -Cr y fel r t1
A ClC re m• • i C AAP r r r 2 0
< z• . saam
'� r ° 1.,-• 3 • h C r r r mcoQ.rn ) a to
r 2
y.rl = n � a p � n
'1 2 -•� Z �•9 y v) « G z A
- Cl) a S -4 a n • C C C .+.... • ..
C) c 2 • Z m • 'O '0 V nnn -
2 "O Z a 3. • < A A -0 -0-0 0 C) 0 G. -'
2 r < a • m rrr In 1n (n ..
r • 1') •-• '2 ...... Tl 0
3'13,1
(1) a• -4 S a 0 a 0 r• V)y 'fit 2
A C) 113 . • r
n m
b0
•
•
J a
P o',ao '.NOO' n
c) -r O. o 7 I- r r r 'T r r' -• (�-
• rI I I . .a• I 1 'i
I I I I 1 1 I
•- ~ I 1 1 1 1 1 i is a a a F F a' a a
5 #I a F ! N N N Co."U U,
F F F F N N N `•) U NDN N r •-r' u 4
(•I P.) N O.U 4' U N 1m p,0 0 O V O N -i
U N .,1 ••O N 1 O' 1 Q) 'a 1 1 1 I 1 1 L. Z
I I I I I a• a .V ••• as N r N c D` 0• C
b A ra- U.. N •N.• r• 1p+ N•+r ;N ; '.' •
r r� I 1
r p �- I 1 ( r 7" P F a r r '.; 2
•I.. u .P F (_ ! F r (J1 N r n) r T s <
(a ••• N,- N N •
r a
N a
7) O 1
•
t1 0 -J
N • 1
S
a r
Ci a
'I) a
• • •• • r,) 0
• a
5• .�
• • • • • • • • ! 0
•
J) y N
a
1 __ -
•
NDN N Nin):J N.P3 N N:N N NI • N • N • NI • N N N N W,N •, N • WN. • N '
N IJNN'NNN'.NNNINNN: * N • P3 • N' • N,J,NNNN •' N• ► NN • N A U •
0.0 a 0.0 0 0 0 0 0,0 0 0 • A • 0 • 0- • O 0:a 0 A O •• 0 ► .42. 4*' • A 2 a
4,1 4.4 W C.41 10. :A W•W :A CA;LA W :A, • .A • U • UI • 14 W114 W W W •. U * W .A • .A :_n - •
.b•.13 0.019 D 13.0i OS 0':2219, • U1 • U7 • JL • 0Ola A Aa ►: ;A • (A(4 • (4 n •
.4 r v-4 -4 r J v � .41.4 V v: p •D • 0 • c. • T EPIC,C S T .1' • 2. • (T T • N X
• ! i > •�
J 1
1 • •
•
O
u C. C.Ca C. C� P. b O JI. .J C. r3 .aa,r00 AACo
:LI 0.1311➢ 9 2 (0 CA CC 0 0 -. (J)
\▪ ,\\\1\ \ \\\\i\ \N. j \ .\ \, \\,\\\.\ \ 1 \ \. \ '1 I •
r.P•r 04.0. r r r r r'... r 'rr, • 1.....10......+4, N r r r a
N AO.v 'V.P)N N N N N.N N N' N 1(J NI N NIN N NJ'N N N N' PJ
0 9 .D p,W 'x D D A .A1 9 :0 0J 9 !II .AI ' 9'pi A .0 0..0 I 0 1 •0 0: D .O
•+.I+P.Po..... .r,.•. P.'..1 r •r r, ••.1...0.r r!r r. r r' r Irl •
•(n
j •
I
. n
z
Wr r NN !r A0 ;WN I �rr -/
r 1 N a IT,W O r n•N r 10:A r W I t.,LA r10+ 05(T INW A N I. 1 CAW 10 LA CA •:o a
.4,q30)•9!A 1) 0) 9 -1 .01N .O A U1 J( O'0 .0 40 d.W 0 9 J N•.N 0 •
• • • • I • • • I• • • '• • • I• • •
3▪ UI T•4'C. A 0 T •a Dir N J' 3 C. slat•0 W W Iv W 051,2 A UI I..0 A 0! v C. n .1) Li I
•••,,n r A'N N as•2 r 7'A (J NI La O UI!UI N 01 1N r -t W.3 .3 (3) A 0- '..J u o •a A
•
•
, I S� S S�' S
_222!722272'222' I Z j
rescc cccsc;scsi n -C �I ' no00010 I •-• «. «•
r m •I 1 z zz z
5192)2)''9912992):599: X CO 001000;0 2 22- CO
rn•r11•1 r'.r1 rn rn•rn!n in rn r(1 rn' rn In '1 2! A SICO CO 2'2 rn ! • • I • c
r r-r r•r• r r• r.r- r-r-r-ri CO c' N cc. im rn
r r r r'r- r r r r r-r r r' 0 •a rn, •9 l:IIm -0 ''' O a s rn .
o C r! ' a ala a a'a -. 1 r r z o
2 -( r, 2731.2222 I a ! rr r1 .-)
.0 C)? ii I rn rn n 2
r 2 CO• N coil N N;N 1 < < C)
r1 0 1 1 2 v 2
n -4 • a 'I1 T' 1')
N -. n rn rn a n
< N ti 2 2 N T.
Z rn n. I n n n N
C) -a ' .a rn rn CO 2
N ')
•
N
•
,1
0
•
r1 0 C < <rn NN In m0 2 •••
rn rn rn rn rn rn r:rn rn rn rn rn rn a O rn rnrn'r'nCZ 2 O a m rn
r..... .r r r r r r n C z S Z Z c a a c c z 2 rn
rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrlrnrnrlrlrnr1 • • • r•rr .-. r 2
2 a'V2 .2 "029b2 '092 2 2 1rr 13 a 2 1
ZSZZ22ZZ2Z222 • a 5212• • • a I O
0 0000 0000 0 0 00 r^ r 0 0.0 1-) r n rn
2222222222222 2 S •46-411.. m00 2 3 a Cr)
;n;n 1-1 rn rn In rn rn rn rn rn fn,n -4 a (A' 2 2!2 0 0 0 a a '1 CO A
C -1-Ii •.•rr ... c n z
CO v! •1• •CO ,• z z z v 1n
,n -I '01 1 2 0 -ti -. a CO 2
CO • r 0 P•:P•• C C • r
a a• rt' • 2 21.2 P•C)A a oar, 2 0
r N• r1 rim 2 2 (1) (n
CO V 1:11.0 O a s a 2 •
,'1 • • • rn V),7) 1 "1
-a Orn rt a 0
• • N(n • •
.
•
N l.. J :3 O CC) .J O J 4.3 O C3' .J '� oI C7 01[7 0 0,0 _) O C)! a)
VA ••• r, r rir r r•r r rr• •-` n
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a 1; 1 1!, 1 1 .1 1 11 ! • I n
A 0 A A,0 A O,A 0 A.A A 0 1 A 0 Al: 0 0'A 0 a 0 0 0 0. A O
.A-W W(...L. U (A.W W W W W(4 14 N N) N N!N N N N N N N .J C
N N N N'P3 N mufti N N N N N • CO C. N' . W W1W W N.T) W' W N• 'V L
rrr0.4rrr.rrr-r•..r• N 0 0I NN1N0NVN O '2 O• T -4
a a 1' 1 11 1
••CT A O W(A W r r r•r r r 4. A 0, 0 41,LA 0 0.0 A MCP
.G •'•Nr W Nr- 9v(AANr r N N. Nr-W O0 N P.I NN
I...+r r ar r N r rr r r W r 0.1 r r PJ «' •
I I 4 1 1 ( 1 ( 1 I or I
...cr, a 0 W cm CA-r r r.r r r' W A A, A 0 W A 0 0 A 0) 1) y
.fl r NI•• W NI r•9 .4 LA 0 N r a- N NI N r•4C A A N N Ns P.) «•
C
•
•
. 2
I/ 1
• .-*
O ^)
• 0
a
3
r•
Gi n
• • • • ► • • In i
• • • • • • • a rn
• • • * ► • • *
I 1 I 1 I I 1 r"i
1 n C) n A 0 C) r)
)[ R 9 x 7c' R x
• (n N (n N N V) (n s
_ - .- _
I .- -- -
•
N • N N N N,N N -• N • N N N • rJ s N • N • ^J • N n ,�
IV • N N N N.N 1..3 • N • N. V fJ • U • N • N • NJ • N) • •
O • a A 1 410 A . F • a a s • A • a • F • O' • A • S 'A
C.1 • ;n LIS A A'A A • a • A' A A • A • • O • a • A A • I. 04 •
• ,. .D...C11.11 .a r .0 • a .J .D •• ]T 5 UI • A • 1... •• f)
N 5 .J.8 a a s UI •• N .+ .+ • t L^ ♦ .f1 ♦ A! • r -.
7 +4
7 -c
• •O
I + : 0 _
D '32'D rn 37"D`IO !Ib 'D j S J (D 9 \ \1 \ m 0
\ ......\ \\I-4,\ •N. \I \.\ \ \
r 'r r r 04'0+r 0+ rii r r r r .r 1. ! r
L
N Ni N N N, N N N fJ fJN N N- N X
\ •\\ \ \'5\ \ •• \ \ \, \ ,\ \ \ 0
D
A as A 3) D,p•D .D m1 •-• D .D' .� D1 `J ('1
f•1
•
I •
•
• 1 ! i ' i t
▪ r I Yr 5 z
.3• 0 •+r wa.
I (. CAI .d 0 V a a I 'J)a U1
✓ a0a N rl 00j UI 0 UI NNI 1.-.r UI!UI NN' 0i 73 N'
D n U J1 • 9' N • . • • • • • • .
• • • • • • • 0 • o
•
d 0--3 .r U1 r.11 T.-. • UIIU1 .vi a ._J a 0 01 0 .) 01171 U)-4' •
UI ..T 7 0 ':n UI clo ..) 0!.0 0 0I a 0 a 0 0i i.] NIN UI LA I, O O 81
1 • I 1
II
•
1
N V) V) V•N.'N IA N Cl)I N N D, I 77 I12 • •N
a, rn a '0
D 15 a X0 0 0 0 0 -4 5.P : -4I -
II
7C 7C 74 - -•-41-I -1 -1 Z 0 Ir*I I N
r C L �� f'1 H 1 C
O 0 0 -4-i-1 1 "1 .i 1 r'1
•p '217 .. n 2
rn rn I A 7 C)17 'A ...I 0 0 O r C 0 0 • 0
rn rn rn -. -4.4 1 -4 m -n 11 N '►n n r Cl
< -t . -4 • rnl i4 C n :J
0 rn 0 54.T. • ..1 2 2 In m'
•a aa -r-1 -1 A N S
O In 1,1 72 73 A a 'rn • Cl 2c 74 O :2 p rrn
rn rn,rn fry A CI 0 0 !
0 0 DA'a a '0 Cl)' -0-0 Z • • 74
o rn CA In Cl)Cl) A -' I+1 r11
17 'O CCCC 0 D r1rn m
.1 XI 72 m ••i n
• • r1 PI 0 1n z rn1 '"
aAaa N. N
• -I
rt
77
C N -4 13 -0 13 12 2 0 m rn O 2 rn T 2 •r
r 0 0 r. Cl 4 -.
r^ n 77 z - a A Z -4 C (9
o0 n 1.4 2222 0 .0.H .-, .T. n 2
rn -$ -4-z 1 0
r- r C. V.-r.y - -4 • -0 v 0
A • r''
a
n w
.-• V7 I 1 0 C.2)041 GZ1 rn 2 3 C a 00 0 n
p R Z a s N 0
-p G• P• p•W 7• 1! r C r 0 73
-4 0 rn > 2 2 2 V) Z
2 z a a a •
A r •-•: '7 \ 2 m 2
�• 2 r, rn rn m m rn r c N ..
r• 2 73•A 73 A 0.1 r rA I', 5 r a a 0
A • 00•A 0 co a rn `'
r1 0 0 0 0 0 "4 a 2: In
7 0 0 • • • 2 A
rn rn r, m �
• • • • • 2 .D • '7 n
• . • r
. c n
o a
. .-- n n l c� C. O CP•o .-• 144 • •„ r. n
r. r r , I ' I C)
1 1 1 1 I1 11 1'' 1 1 r I p O O C
A O p a a'a a - a s A A I... •D
rJ W U W W G/4 U W1 N N N N N A C
W 0 U N Cl)•U1 Ir r •-+ 0 u C. N U CM co
N 0 o r r r r 4.
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 a 1 1 1 1 1 a Cr! r +T
4 G. r r r',r r r 01 r a N N N C
r.. -N N -I UI'A N A • N p -. r r r -
r r r r I.P.r r r N
•
I I 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1r 7,
U G.N r 1.4.r ►- `T r•"• A a N N r
GI NN r111'aN a N. m m N' C
I.-. .D
I o a
`° u 37
~
•- 1 -0 I
• r
•
-2
•a a
2
'1 `1
n 1
• • * • • >• rn
• • •• • • • • • • v1
r + 5 5
I 1 a I rl
_ •1 1 I 1 n n 0 Cl C1
2 2 2 x 2 2 5 V
U) x 2 2 N ,./1UI V.
V1 N Cl)N �
• i
r
, - .--c.....-.
•
N • NN N Ni N N N'N NJ NJ,N N N'N N NJ N'N N NiN • NIN NJ N N N NJ,N4 NJ N: ♦ N N N N • •-
N • N N N J N N N'•N N NIN PJ NJ NJ N N.J.N N Ni N * NIN N N.fJ N N,N N N • N N N N • :"1 il
A • 4• •• 00ao0'000'AO .a00 O O•O A A A • 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 5 .0 .0 .0 .0 • Z 11
.A • 01u1 U1 0,01 4.11.0•Ji 0 CA(.1 0 0•Ul;Ji UI JI C1'0 0•U1 • all UI N .A-U1 al 0i L1 0 N: • 0 0 0 N • 71 •- .
NJ • 1-.. ..... ..0.,...r .... r r • - .) r • .1 .1 • 1
♦
C, 0 -...6 -0t, ...4 -4-4 .0 .4•+.1 +4 -4 ,1-.4
M0-000,0 • 3110 S 0 .9 .0 'n19 b P, • .11 0:U1'.J1 7C .-1
. .-4
! _ 1 ., -�
•
I ! I LI
J 1
•J u .J V V:7 C- O a:7 OI,J 11 7'G a7 U._"u J OIG awl C.• o C'a7 o OIG U u .J o o n
b ,rn o o WI OD Orb CO.0(bl.b(0 0 r71 9 (0 .0 9 p f1IiCO mt(0 rb CO CO3f W..b 'b b' i b W +b CO 1 "4 ','7
\ \\ \\,\ \\+\\\,\\\\\ \\\\\I\ \ \\\,\\ \i\ \\- \\,\\ I M x
r r r r:r r r r r HIr r r'r r r N r r rlr r r r r'r r r!r r r. r r r r :b
IJ NN N NIN N NIA) N)NOP.)N N N N N N.N N NMI N N N NJ 41.1 NJ 1.11N N N. N NAN N • :7C
\ !\ \ • \\.\ \ \ \ \`44\\\•\ \ \\.\ \\I\ \I\ \ \.\\ \.\\\ \\.\\ O
.0 ,ab 0 CO.0!'.O A 31'03 1) 331.➢ .0 b.70'D D 3)'JO.0 32IO2 .704 b b .CO:A 9140 CO.0• .b 'p•.A 13 ' 110
✓ 8.-40-. r NI►. r r r r r'r r.+.r/+ t ,-.*.....”.1+41+ rlr r r'r 0.rir r rr rrrr 71
•
I I iAl
i
•
I
t in
! f• 0 •
4+, W -O r ror' I I31 r N r r IN ! W i WI I ! C
• Z
0+1(0 r W O r•r •u•r 0� r NIW N• 11)1 .1 W v O M CO W 1 -'t
(A (4401/41C, ,r r .1'UI r r'.1 0) Gi r O • •W',d I N 0+1A m 1)1 9- 01 W N s .OI0% O W+O W rl C1 M+m+!1-0 r I 1+1
N W .1 0� O u N;0� r W +0 0+41 4/ O OJ'r N 1440442 -4.4N;.0 M .p
r r NiN .1 N O U1 Q1I O 0+ CO .o .0!
• - • '• • • • • • • • • • • • • • '• • I• • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I• • • • '
O C"b C. 'W() .110U10J)'0OIUI -0D,0+ 0 '0+ 0+C). 00110 WNWNW:D0.130M - 01x1)1-c.NW J
..+ r.)4 c.) '.1 '1 OIW O P,L701 V'.0 UI WIO 0 IVVCit )Oulu .b 420r 0u WOp Or 00„0•-10 0.
I 1
N •N N N 0!0 N 4/1•CO)N 010 N(f1[GA N N N'N N NIN CAIN N NM N N N U1 NI N WO N !
-4 -4 TT'TTT'TCT;TTTIaC TT:TTTT 2122222 21222 2222
n • • CC.CCCCCC;CCCCC 70 .31.3.3.370 slsns•ssslsaa I ss-ss
9 r n,n n n I n n n'I n n n'.n n j r.r r.•1 r.r 1 7<i 7C 7C 70314 74 PC:X 74 7t 1 x JC,74 74 I
! Z Z'Z Z Z z Ol0 O Oi0 0 010 0 01 0 0 0 0 f< I
.nmm I 00,00010 IT M C T ro VIT T C1 MMM M
11
n s • N N'N N CAN MIM M r•1''r'1 M M P M x11 M M M M Z
n ZZ -4-4-4 -44-* P11M M ITI M M MIM M M'. I M M M M I O
r nm ! Cl M'11 M MtM
11 :.o.. • 00'00010 cl« .C< < <;« <. rr'.rr m
a N Ns s s s.s s s,a-s s coca n
Z I rlrrr'rrr'rrr I 3z32 Y
.. s x z 2 z Z a;z I rlr .r r r r rlr r r' m m m m M
2 n 0 nnnn nIn MIM M M:M M MIM m M M M M M ,n
C N N • • • • • I• -41.4 < - i .4 .4 i K 't'!. j X127017 '1C
.T.4T1 • j 11 z1' 2 z z Z 2I
. Z 2 Z' j - 'CO
-(-4 ! MIM M rum M MIM M M. I Cl
nn CACC ICcic=CCE a,
r r NIN N 4/3'0 N CONNN. 1
•
; N4
,1
1
CO
•
M0 .3 CMMMMMMMMMMM 000000;0I r+rrrrrizmmr j Sc50101
C0.
n -. MMrrrrrr'rrrrr -4-r-1-4-'-� ClIMMrlMrizmmrl rMMM 1
U Z x 2 z M M M M M M M M M M M 2 2 S x s.S •
41101 G1 o o 0 r.r r 01 o z z z Cl
0 -1M .+,-innnnnnnnnnn MMMMM'M sIssnssZ'Z2n• nMMM 2
• r CO 7213 .3 .3 31!23 -1-4-1r • • .3.3.3
1 1 CO.39 99 .3 .3 .3 .3mm .4,r.. • ans O
M 01 0 oa mmmmm.m zzzzzzz'zzz• xrrr m
Z. MM -1-i n n n n n n n n n n n .3.3.3 .3.3.3 0000000101010 s N
Z G Z Z- -M l r .,......-,..4-1 O o O O Oi O -4-4 -4-4.-4-1 -4 .-+NNN • n
n T MM T T T T1 TIT rrrr r r,r r.p•4o as r Z C C C •
-y - • • • • • . • nIn n n n n n - m -m •
M'MMM-MM.3..3.3M . TAT •
N nn N N'N N NIN 1/)DN N N'N N M'M M N' rrr -,
as M 00 MMMMM'M Mi•OM w-r.r ,-. •
A r r - A .3'.3.3.3'.3 vl. T T'T T .3I C a CO r11 M M C
.17 < rr < «<l1.0 CICCC'CCOIOOC MONO • 2
c'1 r • • I 0:00 90100100 co 1 P1
✓ n • n n n n n,n r'r r r'r r • • • r
• M M Cl M Cl M•M • • • • • • • •
IA NNU)N1A!(N • i
.
•J • 3) 1)C. f--..[)'G O 0.0 J u,0 G U1 U1 UI N UIIN 014.1100iN N O C)i 4-4m4=1 7 p ,
✓ Ir.. ... W W'r r r r r r.r r r r a 31 W W S;9 W101 m W W W r'r r r rrrr n
1 1 1 4h1 . 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •1 1 n
.0 O O .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0-0 .0.0 .0 .0 .0 44.44 Jr ' 41,40 0 0,0 O 40,44 0 0 O 414414 O O
N ''Q u .O .O:W W W W W W,W W W,W W I W W W W W.W (AIW W W:W W W,W W W. NNNN C
W 4:11-. W(4.r -4.4 .4 -4-4 d d:d V r r r r rIr010 UI U1i C11 N U1!(A N UI' W N:N N ' L '
P+0 O cac,C. .J G.o C,O .=1.0 0 UI N UI N UI1IA 010 0 0 0 0 1,...,0.r O' I. U Cl 0 • .r
1 1 1 • • • I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1'1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1' 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 ,
r .D .) .0 ,C 0+ 0+ 0s 0. 00 W W W.rr .ON UI UI UI U1 .OILU1 Ul",NUI WSW r‘r- 0+0+0. 0 2
✓ r r r N N N r N N UI N r 9 W r r'r r 1+'C. r•r r CO N Is. W,r O NJ r I')r N O
4-.. I-. rra) NN r .lr rrr Nr p.'.00 WN+W 'CMN W .1+Or rrr rrrr •
1 / 1 •i• 1 1 1 1 I' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
.3 .4.1 .0 •0 T 0+ 0+ 0+ 0 0•W W W.r r .0 .0 .0 .0 .0a +O I O 0 0 0 0 41.1... r 0% 0% 0' .0 r
¢ rt-. r r NJ r..NJ r N N N N 0+'12 61 r.•r r rrr rl.....W.r O N'. • r N r N -
x• 1
3)
•0 I
• r
0 N
b
St ...
Z
Cl 1
G) 1.
• •
• • ♦ N C1
• • • • n Cl
• • ♦ ._
1 • 1 1 'I Cl
nn - n • n
X • x
N N 0 0 .-p
• ----777,777:7-1,--
- =-- — --- =-- -- —— _
• N NI • N • N •• :J. • N N N N NJ N NIN"J N NiN N • N • NNNN, r
• IJ Ni • N • N • N- • FJ N N Iv-N4 N N N N N N,ry N • N • N N N N n ,..it
• A 0, • A • A • A * A A 00,000"0 .00 A'0 0 • 0 • .0'000 Z CD ,.
• 41 t,11 • V7 • tit •. U1' • 0 JI J1 0,0 N UI'U1 UI ....n. U)'U1 0 • 0 • 0,0 UI UI rl
• .) .Gr • - • UI •• 0 • N N N N N N NIN N N N N N • N ► N,N N N n
• U NI • w1 • CA •' N • A .4 S m-a T a T 1' 0'. UIiUI L1 • U • ..).O M .. X n
I I 7 ••4
0 iii
D :DI CD ,D CD: CD CD I CD '.D,m AMf12132CL 'D' CDICD CD ICD 0)!0313 3. -• IV)
\\, \ \ \. \ \ \\,\\\1\ \ \' \I\\ \ 4''%4' \. I1 2
'., r r r r r r r'r r r' ••+r r .- 0+4+ 110+ Ia t
NJ NJ! NJ NI rr r j r ,N N N X
N' N \ • N N N N NIN N N'. N1N NiN :.N
p. D CA A o'CD D SID D D I .D 17D D I'D 'D I'D .D C ,'D i
r-i r• IN r' r r ... '.,p.0..4.1.4 r r' r+II..+ - it Iri•-.1+ F•.
•I a
j 1 i
I i �;•
{ N GUI I 2
.•a 1
• I I. I I r I I r N G i I I I -+!.
D N -4:11 (.1
A A i•CD -4 J 1 it r 1.0 r/'It•. N N G N{ U.O N N 4-.44
0 I CO Gh1,D �1I
•40 ,7,N. .D D I...9.. O. as I ,0 A ��ON '.0 A N.•••►+YIN r NJ! r u'i 0 -.1 • ,• •. •.I•
• • • • • • I• • • • • • • • • i • • I. •
n ,:a v N :NON! ,-4 .4 O o .O -I 0D U N
IIN N 'CD' ,1 C 3'.U) *44.. 'D NIG N C)
A 41, C XX. ,13 •2 O) lC U1 a'o N 01 m A •J N o1A•G I U1'0 o a O c,o
♦ I * •
:
C cn ( N NIN rA V)IV)N N' COIN N 0 VI 4.1)N N
< C. C 1 O I i -r 1 I1-4
0 O • C C C C C C C C C C-C C T a,a a s
- rimwnm lmrlrl. mica co = p,A�o/*
f_ I- • 44 n, P rrrrr-rrrj CCC X;XXX: c
r1 r1 n r'. m mIDA a
O N n I m m m m mlm m ml mIm m • ',"1 CA:U) v)N'!. r1
0 ¢ ._., 2 nnnn' 0
N r' 1 X 00000001.- N; 2�2 2 .1 - r r'! O
22 • 1 1 P S I Z Z'�Z Z Z X Z Z, .'1�r1 r1 r1 3)
O 2 n T r .+ 2 2'2 2 2;2 Z Z 2'2 2 a • aa. a D Ln
• 4 n ,... Cl ' < n I1 r1 r1 ('. ' 2;,2 2 3 2'2 2 2 I
N 7 f'1 n 00000,C000 G1 G•f G) .•,.• ..►4 Cl
w G21Z7 ZC X
A a n :
C: C to f1 f1�n f1 t1'
A v m • l •
OOOoolCCC Cl 1 -
n - CCCCC,C CC Si I 11
i l H P4.4 M M'.I H M Cl
11 .7 SAI,, 13 T:"f 11m
• • • • • • • • F•
N
1
. i ' .A
3 'n 17 2 CA Cl O • I1 Pt 0(i) 0'0 0 0 I1'rn to
Cl mmCOJ .•
rI Cla T O O MM 11 ,I T"1 2'22 A r r I• r 1
0 Cl CCZZT,')1�1T OC G) 0000 r1
O (* O � 2
o 2 N Cl C .-.M I•)C l N••H H A,,.'D A rl Cl . 0 G) 2
X X 1 0 2 n '017.72 m n,n n n • • • n • • • • 0
� r- > • o -
n n r I r1 • • samrlr•1m
Tr f1EAIn r Ci V) r s332 n
C n N XX 0'000. MMM
M .A-. D A n N
X. s In N C,C C C 72''7' m N .. .-. n
_N 0 n •C .... C C tIM M M 444 C Z 2 2 2 a
rC y -4.4 -. CD -.: -•I ..
rn � 0 r 22 „ Crr rr, v . • • CD
rr D 0 2 r • • f.°r-rrrr non r -•
r r i1 2 .. • r r ;I'M r1 .. r T w 11•
.+..r1'r1 r1 11 VI'V) UI
C • • n 11 I9 NjU1 N N. t'I 0
m I,,I A • N D• P N CD CD 77 70 2
MO r = 00 f'1 r1 ITl 11
0-4 in IA D >, vv7m
A : • r' 1 f'1 • • • •
m 'D1
• • •
•
•
,D -7 0 0 0'0 O OI0 0.7. C./coN O 0 4.0 n
r .• r . ....�.+ •r r
CO OD
I I I1 1 1 1 Cl
1 I 1 I 1 1 '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '1 0'000 0
A A p A A 0 .0 .0.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AAA A
A '�' • VII N N N N N N N.N N N U'U G N N;N N N• C
N N co . N N 1 4-r r r r r N • G:G G G Z
NJ NJ, N jr .OI � p r U U Q rrrr -�
N O• G O O' G O 11 047 O O,O O O' N)-NJ NJ I 1 1 1 1
I I I I 1 I I II I A U •l l 2
OP U S A r U r.G V I r r 43'00 04 N cA S 'D 2
•- Q, r A N NJ.4... .. .1) .0 rr - N
N N r 4-" N N r r N,p r rr A N •
r r. r r U a I 1 I I I .
11 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 a A co r r• ^
•
..3. * G Cr, ... Q) (.I .1 NI 1..• ,L7 VI r r ,CIo+ A "4 N IJ)r CD T 2 •
IV �.) r r .I �) r A N N V►'11 U1 .0 .+ C
.0
CI •
Wyr c
U) .0 C77
U r O 1
J 0 N
• 1
a r
3
C.
v) n
• CA
CI
• •. • • • .4 • A 11
• • • • • • • .0
• • I• * • I )
CI n
n n Cl n Cl CI X
X = X X • x :n X
N N A y y
n , .
•
N N • :V •• N1 • N • N • N V N •-
N N N V N N N N N N • N • N • N • N • N N N n 4)
a •• a ••, a * a • a • O'P a =
R O O a a O a O a •. a+. • .a * T •. T..Q' T ;n ^- • J
S v T Li a U N I
•
' I I U IO .�0 V A ��
:J .'1 C. L G '3 CJ 0t• .D x S CD 33 .y Cl)
.0 S M S - CD S a (D - 1 an o y ,\
•
' \\\ fl Z
r ✓ t r r r r r ✓ r IJ • •- ,
N N fN N ` ` ` N N S) Al :N Nih. N 0
13 \. \ 4. 1 \ V
D D S .0 p S S '3 i D D '� CD 1N'Nr '
r r .-• r r r r r r r •r r r r Cl
13
i I Cl +I
1
I 1
a
I
O I
C
• ,. ,� • N NI • a j
R m T 1r r a s u1 .11 � u CA I a s m a r
a ,ill 1A IN N .A(A ,N N '-4 V o Cl u u .a a U1 Cr I+,•• u uI CA lA I 0l h• N Cr.N '
J+ !C c , 3 o 01 CN 1-d V UI 541 '_,o - : a s - V ,01 so o u i N N
• • ;• • • I • • • • • •
• 1• • '1. • • • '• • • • • 1• • CA N O O I
.' A C] i.3 -J .5 0 INN �{A 0 .0 3 r r 10 Cl .Q .p ( 010 TTI a 0 1\i-4 ,
'3 0 0 1.3 Q '0 0 ;-) V S a' a3 > r r I'3 O .O J) 1 i.JIO -i -1I N N NIN 1 N S O I
•1 • I • •; •
I
jI I I
2 IC n XI r0 a 2 a n n 'N xi C C j AIS C I
n i o Cl n Z I 0 21 C D w m l r Cl 731 7l rt
51 • '3 00 2 ..� Cl N O O Iin C) OI r r 010 7
AC, .. m 0107 6) <
Cl • -4 2 t a N 0 Z R1 n I-C Cl
1�1 • \ •r -+ Z S n !A ni 2 I 41 C Z
.y 2 S m SO z 0 O I 0' N 1H ( X17, 0in 0
S 3 Q) .2 Z I O Z Cl Z .«+ SI
C O D.
0 A N 1 73 1 r!r r I A
• - D 0 Z O '3 a (1 •CC11 �I. .y III AIA A n
2 • 2 O D 0 -{ N • Cl 212 2 S
7C • -'1 O '3 A ( I Cl N 010 0 Cl
n Cl Cl N rn .. Cl Cl ri , n
f 2
2 ol C I H 7C
z a A
r 71 rn Cl N fn
XJco (I) I I Cl 0
•
-4
1 i In
I 2
NI-1
61 .�.
C) CA C '3) J C Cl 0 C N < NI
n r -. Cl -. rn Cl o Tl .-, Cl n l aa Cl -.
L C .. S D z Cl
-. O 2 O I = '3 2 •5 n .• •T 2 • O'.<m 2
C �) • '3 I3 • Cl Z 0 C/) 0'm D
0
D D 2 n C 09 n Cu; Clr' l
1 ra Z n .. 73 Z Q•',K N n
XI 0 Z •- _ 2 C
Iv, 5 2 I o C 0 N •' 9 • C'),rn v •-,
IA • n -13 • -4
0 2 Q• Z'N r -+
0 I) w Cl) Cl) m Cl T • 21 I 0 11•m.. ..
(n Cl • rn Cl •
(II Jn N
1 , •
•
o o n a
a7 0 � r O Cl Uf O O I O h••-•H n
I r r r p.. 14 1+•" u r I I I II I 1 1 1 • n
✓ r r
1 1 1 1 1 I i 1 a a a Ia. a a as a O
a a a O a a a a C.., N N u'(9 N C
S UI - N u L. L. N N - N 1 S'IA N 2
J r {A r r N u a ; 4' .... N 010 O .4
. I I S U1 I .I N T t I I. I I
I I ,-- U U r a a cr. UI a u r� L r 1.•r 2
Ut V)U1 J
r) .- N ••- r N • r N N r N r r r
•
1 .. 1 I I I L-' U to N t a T a a W a U
n� h• • r r (. Cl rj + N r N r
(II 0 UI C
N •
0, N N l.'1
a CA r - -T. -$
L4 n Cl) C' 7 1
a N N • •.''
O N
1J
a r
3
Cl '3
„) n
• • • • N•
C)
A Cl
• • •• • • a
• • • I f•1
n C7 n
2x2!
N N 5 N'
•
N'^J .J rJ'NN N) 7j N iJ N3.J N J N N NI`)N N N N n -O '
C.). rU N; (U NN N N N N N N N N
J. N, 0 N'. a 0 1 N N.N N N N N NaIV IV N 1 1 A ! 1 1 1 A ! .0 2 -
A A, A !, A. A A A A 1 ! J 3% 1 D ;p r '1
y 3 D' .y 437) 77b 5 J ➢ DpJ7 33— b b p r r r n
+ f•r r r r r w 7C ;-Y L
.J N' ry N'. r. rwrrr+r r .�
"., .'], •D• Y,3!D IA'S LX) :T O+ JI 1 :A u r1 N
,A. N' 7 -•
0 -t
!
1 •
�� I40 a
i c-r •.3; nl:, .71.C› o:3oaCe nma 'a m v " N
Z miam0mm maam0A OD OD CA \ -4 _
D
\ \, \. \; \, \,\\\•\\ r r r r r ," r '..
IMP
_ • p... r!r r r r r r r•r r NIr N r N N N N N 'N N ;N O
N NI N- Ni N N17.3 N N N N N N N N N4.rJ `1` \ \ \\,\ \ \ I'S
.D A J J7 4i J7 . Jl D 37 p D J) 3i Ja :O.1213a .►'w •.. Y r Y P+ r r .I In
r m
1 , •
{ I i I S
! 1...1-11 N CU W C
• ••: r 'o r r.>r r..IM i IA UI UI 1 4!co m a n _� ! -r
d v, N N' ....1" :.r l r' l A CO!A ! (A 4 !N I C K 0 0 0 0 1+'r N N r r 1-
-• .0.Q', 9 0, 1 A: ;D •I T a JI0! !O N -4 N NaN 1 10 o 0,0 -0'3 UI 1)1 r;r 3%l
.D' W(A!, 01•' r.1 W, N N1 r r'�. a.'.A O W 10 A OI;v A AIUI 4O:O J/ Na N !Ul U1 I• • • • •• • •• • • '• • I 1
• • • • ; • • ' • • ; • • ! • • • • • 1• • • • • • • • • • . • • • O O 'O O o O NiN o J 0l0 0
♦ W W' '7 J. .D Jai Jt Ut J '71 U u 0 4 0 ',7 u`0 0 01CO A3 0 W co QM W LT(
0 0 10 0 I O 0,,<,
IO ,7 0 O!O 0143 ,21 1 1+111
7 -0 ,O, 'J U. 4 WI O ci O V,O O .Ac3 U I'M J 0,0
•I ► i• '♦ •
• •i •I S.
j
• • • •1
I •
•
Y
y. a 2; 2'2 t V:3 2 i 2 2':2 2 211 !=Z '' r• i Cl C.C..f`'1 '.a o n
N • rlr-1.•.44.4 M 0 0'43 0 010 a s A A' 1 '1 a '0
' 3 :00 -I' 0 0 0 0'43 O i 0 0 0 0 010 A A Z Z 0 O 0 �1 m
'� C.0 C CAC C I O 0'43 O O'O j<t 2
r •Z C' A P' 3 Z 12 1C- 2 N G
O io o. \I 77'77 77 77.77 m 's in n*CO s• 0 I m m;m 0 Z -.-' Z
-•I T' -41 U)N NNN I N inn*CO N!N :S 3 2 x.
:n m. a -1, w -�1-1 -r'.1"1 A 73 ', .-. On I CCC. n a , 00
Aa a a 2 2 z A
1 2.. Cl n m• a.a a 0 Ix a ! 2222212 v N -4 a I N N N •• Cl O n
q
mm•m77C1'1 70 '0 13 'CI i3 2
2 -/ 2
,A y 2 Z'.2 2 2•2 2 I r'1
'D 77 (/1 A 7C,7C 7C 7C 7C 71 01(n NNNN • .O I AA 3 2 `)
,�-. A N -H' 0 a I N(n N a C
0 2 w rl•rl n A A A O n0 0 010 a Cl CI
!n N Z C Cl O'O O O O O A 77 AiA a
m Cl Cl n • • • • • • rn CO(n N(n.n
•
I Cl Cl
to 70
N .0.. •
; .0.
2 •
2 II I I -i
I I i 1, 11 li
A
< Cl :n rn O 000O,OO • 000000 00 12 CO i 0 •431 0 OD Cl pp
a 1r.1 m Cm -1 : 12 T Z .. o fX fX 2 = M Cl 3
•• 7 4 C m = 2 2 2 2 2 • 2 S S Z 2S S S
. Z r^. N 771'1 mm mm 777300.00 00 • 2 AAA :0 A r
A.A A A JO A 77 A A A A•A 7II A 1 O
n 7 r t : a9 0t D 2 S 7� 9 0 w to n
9.12 IS 1.'0'0 a : 7l A A 2 2 Cl C7
-. Cl N n A A A A A A 70 70 Gl
1 O N 70'0 A 70 70 0 z � 43 0 O
r O Z w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.O O O 77
11 X1 11 it'71'll • • • • • • • • P • A <
+ N • • • • • • • • 1 • I • • • G n
• �T -Al fl i A •
N H Cl) CO m Cl .•
U1 01 ul 01 GI 01 N N Cl Cl 3 !n L.
r. A C Cl - VfNNN NN 77mm +177'77 mm :0 0
77'033 772177 °• 0070 A
X) -I. 10 2303373210 73 13 33 xi4444<.XI < 4 2
2• Z ' ClC'1nn00 nCl • 0 ClCl n n
Z CI nnr5lCl Cl • 77770 Cl
(A 01
U)CA0770 7777777777'.77 f'I f'1 rn rn CO rn
i
rn,(n IA MIA U5 rn Uf(A rn rn CO CA CO
O Cl r 0 ',1 N r O :,UI n7 10
O. 0'1VI 03101LA 000'31001;02
000UII,c/I0 r r 01 444 2 W "• n
C. N �1 Y 0710033010 9 'Ji'R/OJ Oo Rr ►'►I I 1 1 n
• 1 1 1 1 1 1
I.- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A A 0
I 1 IA! A A LA u '
a A'A A ASA ! A! a N 4 4 CO (. r, •-•
C
A A A A W. W 4 4 W W W W W 4 W W'W co 4 1 r r w .
IJ JI� � �' � r•-•••••r r•r r r UI • 4' � p .y
r P. U1 U1 UI N 1 1
N �, Cl.. �! ri N31NU1'C71N UINtTNU1U1 NUI I 1 1 1 1 r 2
Y a r r U LA
W ut A 311 W' 10.31 U1 N U1 UI w N N 01 01'31 COpa pa La.'O N m W W U) r n) N 0
W .� a r• N r.r r r Y n r Y A r r 1 I
A N r r.1D A 4 N 0 r.D 1 W N4 CO N I 1 1 1 1 1
✓ 1' A r r 1 A N '
I I 1 1 1 r r '.( r Y r u
D N.O UI
W A A a J ,D r r r'r r m CO N m <
W .. N r '17 r •
• 4
r p
O SI 1
•
• r
0 N
3
r
3
r' -0
U) a
(0 Cl
a Cl
Cl
Cl
r
r
4 , . ... .. - -
-- --- --- ---- - --,---,- .--- -- ---, -. -----..
.--•••••7•,- ----
. •
. • •
. •
, .
• . . .
. . . , . •
* M •4 IV :M NI Ns M -M r1/4.) cv k-•
• N .6.• r..2 rk.2 rk, N N N N) fl ...4
. . .
• . • a a a 'A a I A a a a A 2 33 .
• .
. •* A 0 CO • ,0 CO '0 CO .0 CO 33 ,i r .
• t..• ,..., l•1 LA IV .N.1 IV N.) M.) I\J n
. . •• (A INJ -•-• 11 •A ..i .1', ...11 A X r)
2 r
, -
, 1 r
. •
•
. I ,
. • I . 1
0 .-4.
. ,
• • . . , . • I
• , .
, . I I I •
• ,
• • •
C
. . . i ,0
. . . . ,..,,
„ . . ••C
C• :C. :0 1 LI G •") i" • r•
. 1 •1:1 .33 ,CO 1 co 33 :CO m I CO CO i 33
•
. ,••• `,.. ••• I s. ..... ;..‘ -... I.., .••• Is' •• 71 2 •
4.,,. i
. . *•• •-• ••• 4-• 1•.• •-• i1". 1.4 ;•-• r•
' • • IV M •M 1 i‘J rs.3 i I\-3 (1.1 ,M • lx
• I . `•• •••• •••• I'''..! `... I.... ...• 1.•. .05 i-.• • C
. I •. .0 !A .COTr a CO I CO :33 I CO 'CO '0 '0
. . •-• ••• ,••• •-• 1 pA •-• I o-• ••• 71
1”. tP.
. • , I I I .
. . . . . 4
. . I I •
, I • . . ,
. . . . 1
. .
I ,
, .
• . • i ' i I I
I
. I . I 1
, I '
• .
I I
. • , I • I j .
I
•
. ,
. '
. . i
. .
• . . ;
1
, I
. . , • ,
. .
,
• .
' • I I t
I I 0 I
Cr,• I IV••I•-•1.• (.,i ' -41 •
• , C 1
,....1N,43.000,1 IT , Ni
.41 •
. rp.. , 1 ! -
. , . . . . . . , • , 4 .1 .• • . 0 I i ; ...
,31 r•.,4,..4 ...1.0.3c..2N 0 -4i0c0,41 -di-4 -.4,-4 (.11:U' 1 u!10 (Al CA PP. ! ..4
• 0 mO0o04%.2042,u0oN04 • 010 I'.)-(4 uo 0.c.2 (01,m (A(A 1.,, CO
1.41 - 00',N001N1k30.-. 0 ,-.21...001 0•42% al° J,, c7, No ,. :, (..1(.1 =To 1:)!,2 wo 4:0.0 43!
, •
• , • •:• • • • • • • • • ,• . • l • i• • • . ,• • • • ,„ • • a .• • !• • ,• • ,• • ,
• • .1,1f C2 00 CO ‘.0,../1 Ln 0.--.1.13 Co!Li;0 o oo 0.-3 oio oo. oIo COo 4.2'o olo oo olo o.
LII I 0 AI a 02 ,.0:cr. a 0 i-.1 0 0 I.*0-4 0!0 0 0 0-0 N.0 010 0 0 J 0 00 0:0 -.1I•4 01
. I
• . .
, .
•
• •I •. *. * • * • •I •I I • •
' . •
I
I .
. , I •
I I
I I
. •
, I
• '
. I
I I I .
. ,
. 1 I
. .
• '
• I I I
21t i.• -I C) -0 ;rn 73 ttn 2
• .
•
-4• i
• r I 6 ('1 1. '0 Is i is
I I 53 -4
• O. "n-ni-fw 111 ,iI -n"11!11 11 11'11 11 11, !X 13. :0.4 n ...1 C -t .2
.
-4 caccaccaccaccci 12 i 2 2 .4 r C.0 r CO
. i 0.- 2zz22.222e22222; I 14 ,2 I •-••• :2 (0 I 70 ,I, G
I r amonoiocmoamaom4.4
i .2 IC It, .•4 0 (/)
44 4
-.1
4.4 ,2* 1.4
CO
I m I CO 0 M
' 2
i Mo2'.40N1000NNrrra ...1 1,-* I-I • 2 •2 I CC 2 M 10 :0 ' 0
(AIAIoAMM:0*..0 .0CA,1,0cA1A MIC) ,Al i rn 0 C - 0
CO Ix 1 r- 0 -4 ,2 la. CO ,u
...4.4
,-.4 -4 -4-4-1 ..4,-4,4-4 -4-4..4 . 4,1 .-• a z :z• CO n
• lacaoa,ocla,cooaool CO iii c m r 2 2
-4-4,-4-..4 -4,-4-4 -41. .. ..•4I i CA •iAi I(/) ,71 -rt ;r^ rn
IbBc.. .. 1...msm.. . . . .1•1 •
!II al CO, c")
rrrrrrrr-rrrrrr 1I • x
'2 -a ; i
, • 1
m BI , c-I I
.
. •
,2 I 0 .Cl
!
. , • ; .0
.
• 1 , I R I •
.4
, C/1
. I I •
• •
I .
. I -4
71
CO
• ; , •
, I
. i .
i
CA 0 •0 Cl CO 0 0 '0 •c 0 •••••
Cl --I 1 0 7, 71 -4 -. Cl n ...I
X I X C 11 11 2 2 2 •I ri •
rn Cl PI 1-.1 C C rl in • 0 1
73 CO CO "LI 2 .Z 73 73 0
0 0 2 1 0
n 0 1:1 0 0 XI 0 a rit) r,t1
2 73 CO X ..... X X ,-• •
, 0
a 0 0 I:* 73 0 0 z a n
x -rl -fl ,_, rri -rt 11 -4 A
0 • • 2 •-4 S • • n -
rn ....1 1 0 13
0 0 In • 0 0 0 2. Z ...-I
(.1 CO C rn M . . fl n..
2. CO 0 0 0 '• 0
•C le 0 •C C ri • Z
-.• 1...1 S) • -1 1-1 17
n Cl 11 n n ! .
71 PI 7 • C) rl
• In ca • , In Cl)
•
. .
. t .
. ,
• . ,
. ,
•
. . .
. , .
. •
:
'
. .
• .1‘1 I
, • •• o•-• 0 !15 ,.. i 4.71 I 0 Cs C.3
. . .
4- ....i •(.11 O... CO 0) ••••• ,••• C)
.
. • 1 A A 0 14 A ,1 I i • 11 • cl • t
CA :0 ta I a 'CA 'a a a a a 0 • .
. •
. t VI ,ra 14 :NJ 43 st3 CA :CA N l..1 C
•
.
• •
. •c.4 ,3-. i(A :0 :CO03 •1.-• i•-• CA .‘11
. •
0% ;0 'U) I a •0 0 CD t.11 NJ .C ••
1 0 .4 . 5 11 , I I I I ,I
•
0 'CO 4.11 '0' 0 •..4 LAI U) (-A .4* 2
1
, c, .••• n O ,r 4- .•-• s.3 r ,'D
0 r 1..3 •r 0 '4- M M 4- ... •
1 1 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 4
,, ,il 0 c•-• ,.:. -.4 a 0 ,... 0 .....
" r 0.• r CI r ... ,.... r.4 4-. .7
. c
-CO . •
..1 ,
• .
.0 2 .0
CO
17 1
• • r
0 IN2
• i
. 32
• . a ,-•
. , 2 .
Cl -9
0 r•
• t) ;:i
• 0 r1
5
• 1
Ii
ri I .
,
• .I-•
• • . • t(9o •
. •
, .
' . • , .
•
.
. ' .
•
. '
. • ,• •
. •_
'4 :i • :", -.I _ 6 F.'l . ,: ', -' . 1 -.i , 1..... .. : . '. ', z -1 .. 1 • , - j
4 k .
la
0 0 0 0 H H v v 0 CO a
H H H H H H N H H H 0 I
0
.A -A A -A -A -A .A A -A -A0 t
NNNN co W -A4 W CO CA
N N N N N N H I-' C0 N c r '
0000 0 0 NF-' 0 N
H F-, W F-' Co CO C0 (0 H CO OD (
0DJF- 0 1-3 CoOoI-' 0D F-' H I- H A N F-'
H H I-' I-' 0 A N F-' H H I-, H H H F-' 1
y -;
b CA c
4 0 I-' F--' W H Co COOO c0 CO I-' CO SD
`U CD R a) COCO Co F-' CO H I-' H H -A F-, 004
11 CD CD
0 11 CY H
H CCD ) <G 0000 I-' I-' •••.3 ••.1 0 CO C
I-' '11 0FJ H H F, H H H F-' N H H
H 'Tl 0 H H H H H H I-, H I-' H,
11a 0 a 0000 0 0 00 0 0 C
H H H H H HH H F,
Cn a 0000 0 0 00 0 0
R a
ka
01 W I-'
N CO CO 0
W - I-' N
--1 H W CO A (0 Co
{ft Cf) N _A O N 0 0) H 0) N A (.0 IC
U1 F-' -A • • • . . • • • • • C
N ON N NWI� d) 0 N N W 0 0 r
.. ,. 0) .ACO .A01 0 0t co N.) 0 N
W N c0 I-,
�l CO N CO F-'
N (.00o -
� . G:
ND 1-0 't Ny (C) C/) PO y
0) ON �l 01 N CD 0 0 CD O C) 0 C'
• U) CI) U) I
▪ CD cr cr • '1 0 F
'1 W P) 0 0 CT
S) 04 (14 0 I-a I
F-H CD CD P) Cr CI) ''1 x
H
CJ) C sz' c) -;,-
0
r0 0 Cn ›
▪ _ ='0 N. (D C)
00 X
H 'R C] cr
H. ''h
CD P) •
C!) 'I
04
CD
CD
• O C) Z C) U)
O • t7 CD 0 cr
a (n b = R H P)
cr C
li 0 CD CD r•
• P-d
0 c (CD H O
'7_,
O CA t'l CD
CT X P)
_ _ _ 11 P) (D Cn
CD Cl) C
En CT0 • S
CD
En CD 0
'1 = 'l
cr
1
0
H
U1H
.A
N H 0 c')
CO CO N
�1 N CO N CO CO r
N CO F' CO A O r.;
C) N 0 01 '-1 0 ON
0o co Co cc) CX) OD X.
CO CO CO CO CO CO 7
.) -) -) 0) 0
. W N F-' 0 c0
City of Shakopee
,. K ° POLICE DEPARTMENT
\ it4,<""F 476 South Gorman Street
�jV SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379Q ,#
Tel. 445.6666 :X;<
55379 i
t.
TO: John K. Anderson
FROM: Tom Brownell
SUBJECT: Warning Siren Control Unit
DATE : August 5, 1981
A warning siren has been damaged by lightning, destroying the
radio control unit, which will result in the siren being in-
operable until the spring of 1982 if a replacement unit is
ordered at this time .
RECOMMENDATION:
Purchase one radio control unit, cost $1, 000 .00 .
FUNDING:
1982 Capital Improvement, Civil Defense .
go e EtcrE aotect
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
129 E;st 1st Avenue PURCHASE Date 08-05-81
Shakopee, MN 55379 ORDER - - -
Phone (612) 445-3650 NO. 2 0 2
TO r
D
Mr. James Peterson E Il City Hall ❑ Fire Dept.
L 129 E. 1st Ave. 334 W. 2nd
Electric Service Company v [ Police Dept. n Comm. Services
E 476 Gorman 129 E. Levee Dr.
1609 Chicago Avenue R
❑ City Garage I I
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404 J 0 500 Gorman
SHIP VIA: F.O.B.:
QUANTITY DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
1 Warning siren radio control unit $ 1, 000 . 00
Frequency 155. 745
Tone 136 .5
Common 944. 1
Alert 691. 8
Attack 562 . 3
Fire None
Cancel 851. 1
•
Ue artment uth rization CityAdministrator
P
Mireft
s05eta Sales Tax Exemption No. 8025237 This Purchase Order VOID unless signed
lndicat"e Purchase Order Number on Invoice by the Shakopee City Administrator
raorrrE. -- VELI • -"nt PINK — Purchasing
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson , City Administrator
/ /
FROM: LeRoy Houser , Building Inspector
By Judith S . Cox, City Clerk
RE: Air Conditioner on West Side of City Hall
DATE : August 14, 1981
Background
Council has already approved the installation of the air conditioner
on the west side of City Hall ; however, the cost as approved is
incorrect . The low bid was $5 , 618.00, but in the memo to Council
on July 21 , 1981 (attached) there was a transposition of figures ,
so Council approved an expenditure of $5 , 168 .00 rather than the
$5 , 618 .00 quoted cost .
The $5 , 618.00 quote from Associated Mechanical is still the lower
of the two .
Action
1 . Reconsider the motion of July 21 , 1981 "to have the new air
conditioner compressor installed on the west side of City
Hall at a price not to exceed $5 , 168.00" .
2 . Amend motion to accept the quote of Associated Mechanical
Contractors , Inc . to install a new air conditioner compressor
on the west side of City Hall at a price not to exceed $5 , 618 .00.
3 . Roll call on main motion as amended .
JCS/jms
/(
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson , City Administrator
FROM: LeRoy Houser, Building Inspector
RE: Air Conditioner, City Hall
DATE : July 21 , 1981.
As you know, the Compressor is out on the Air Conditioning unit
on the west City Hall building. What this means is we have the
air conditioning housing left of this unit .
We have $4,000 left over from the budget on the east side of
City Hall H.V.A/C unit installation and the boiler installation
on the west side . The cost of installing a new unit on the west
side is $5 , 168 .00. The balance can be obtained from Revenue
Sharing.
Recommendation
I recommend the unit be installed new, now.
LH/jam
, ..,... .... . .,,
, . -r ---i
14-‘ ‘)S0( 1 1\ 1 Eti
. , I., k. ',,,, 4 4
/
i cr - ANI ' i erNTRrCTORS , ,
1 106 'NORTH
July 21, 1951
City of SI-ia.1,--, ,Dee
129 E. 1st Ave.
Shakopee, MN 5517°'
Dear Sirc:
We are pleased to quote the replacement of a 10-ton
condensing unit with a 10-ton. Carrier Model. 438AE012501
including all necessary piping , vriring,root N,,‘7,l,ork , ,hoisting
.i
and electrical ,./iring for the stun of : Five .ou...sa.nd Six
Hundred Eighteen and no/1.00 ($5 ,618 . 00) .
Sincerely,
ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL
CONTRACTORS, INC,- 11
i ) (;)////
----;- ,
' Joseph M. Sand, Jr.
President
JMS/gep
, ,,,„
.. ,
,,.
/r Q-
HOOV— AIRE, INC.
-�R` Sa o � � �'�
CI (CATIONS
6840 Shingle Creek Pkwy. _,Nn FTIMATE
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55430
(612) 566-0610 j
(.- ► Y Or Ak"0e
JOB NOW
f�`1 k'S fas --; ,Lt1 _._ V 1 '._ 1` 5.(.--__.
JOB 1. 1,CiVTI
A of , (44 -55319 _- __,`
DATE OF PLANS Grt
-- --�
:,„,or nor essnry h :ne completion : t,,,,
Rein OVA L.-
1 v 723 Ki
0.0.0>b t isG L)kirr t ec A c-- r iJ 6 _ -J J c t_ t —r 1-11
G� � - -��-�/'-'`r' _T__l,1 0 _7;,v �u,�'.� 67107,(A1. _C.�_ -----_C.�-I�1.1-r'.._._�1�F_1
r 0 Po A c-- _.._ IV e_�i c s A-1_L L A--r e/N C> , (k_.aLe-0...) t r
140 I rt.) C[-t- +JvP,-
ter--l ra y tc. furn,sh material and Labor-- complete in
.s% x Ua A-06 l tki s) _47 toN%y /t1 _ )
,,lied All work to P completed in a substantial workmanlike
eq wpm:tted, per stars and prathces. Any alteration or deviation from Ar n..
r fra costs will be executed only upon written orders,and will bemre an
e estimate. All agreemeio contingent upon strikes accidents Of delays
' ,rry tire tornado and other necessary insurance Our worker;aT f"J7 No+,
W: „non Insurance w In r]xiIhiec�O day:,
r`1...iNiCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices specibcatrons and conditions are
' +r. to ^ cepted You are authorized to do the work as specified Payment we! be
Signatu'o
IlL
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director
RE: Finance Department Operations
DATE: August 5, 1981
If there is an interest on the part of any council member to
have an orientation with the Finance Department, I will be happy
to hold such a session either during a work day or after hours.
General subjects to be covered could include duties and functions
of the department, services available and the reports that we receive
from Logis.
Due to the uncertainty of being able to take vacation time, I would
suggest the first week of September.
- J
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE : Amendment to City and Shak-O-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc .
Lease Agreement
DATE: August 14, 1981
Introduction
City Council directed City staff this spring to draft an
amendment to the above mentioned lease agreement to prevent
further liens against the City. Also attached is the
Release Agreement for your information .
Amendment
The attached amendment includes several changes including the
one requested by City Council listed under Section 5 . ARTICLE
XVIII .
Action Requested
Approval of an amendment to the Lease Agreement between the
City and the Shak-O-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc. , dated
September 16, 1980, and authorize proper officials to execute
same .
JKA/jms
Law Offices of
/ I �.
KRASS, MEYER & KANNING
Chartered Phillip R.Krass
Shakopee Professional Building Barry K.Meyer
1221 Fourth Avenue East Philip T. Kenning
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
(612)445-5080
August 14, 1981
Mr. John Anderson
Shakopee City Administrator
129 East 1st Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear John:
Enclosed please find an original and two copies of the Amendment to
Lease Agreement which should be presented to the Council together with
the appropriate resolutions adopting the same.
I am also enclosing a copy of the Mutual Release and Stipulation of
Dismissal with Prejudice, together with the attached Mechanic's Lien
Satisfactions. The original of the Satisfaction was filed with the
Hennepin County Recorder and the Stipulation filed with the Clerk of
Court.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Yours very truly,
KRASS, MEYER & KANNING CHARTERED
Philip T. Kanning
PTK:smb
Enclosures
File #1-1373-114
/(
AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee, a Minnesota municipal 'corporation,
(hereinafter designated and referred to as "Lessor") and Shak-O-Valley Amateur
Hockey, Inc. , a Minnesota non-profit corporation, (hereinafter designated and
referred to as "Tenant") did on the 16th day of September, 1980, enter into a
Lease Agreement, (hereinafter "Lease") ; and,
WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend said Lease Agreement to
provide for certain additional terms and conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
contained herein, which each of the parties hereto acknowledge as adequate and
sufficient, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. ARTICLE IV. USE shall be amended to read as follows:
-"4. 1 The demised premises shall be used for purposes of an ice arena
and for such activities as may be lawfully carried on, in and about the
demised premises. Tenant shall not use or occupy the demised premises
or knowingly permit the demised premises to be used or occupied contrary
to any statute, rule, ordinance, requirement or regulation applicable
thereto, or in any manner which would substantially diminish the value
or usefulness of the demised premises or any part thereof. "
2. ARTICLE XI . DEFAULTS OF TENANT shall be amended to read as follows :
"11. 1 If, during the initial term of this Lease or any renewal term
(a) the Tenant shall fail to continue the use of the demised premises,
or (b) make an assignment for the benefit of creditors , or (c) a volun-
tary petition be filed by the Tenant under any law having for its purpose
the adjudication of the Tenant a bankrupt, or (d) a receiver be appointed
for the property of the Tenant by reason of insolvency of the Tenant, the
occurrence of any such contingency shall be deemed a breach of the Lease
and this Lease shall , ipso facto upon the happening of any of said
contingencies be terminated and the same shall expirE as fully and
completely as if the day of the happening of such contingency were the
date herein specifically fixed for the expiration of the initial term or
any renewal term, and the Tenant will then quit and surrender the demised
premises to the Lessor, but the Tenant shall remain liable as hereinafter
provided.
11.3 The specified remedies to which the Lessor may resort under the terms
of this Lease are accumulative and are not intended to be exclusive of any
other remedies or means of redress to which the Lessor may be lawfully
entitled in case of a breach or threatened breach by the Tenant of any
provision of this Lease. The failure of the Lessor to insist in any one
or more cases upon the strict performance of any of the covenants of this
Lease or to exercise any option herein contained shall not be construed as
a waiver or relinquishment for the future of such covenant or option. In
addition to the other remedies in this Lease provided, the Lessor shall be
entitled to the restraint by injunction of the violation, or attempted or
threatened violation, of any of the covenants, conditions or provisions of
this Lease. "
3. ARTICLE XII. ASSIGNMENT shall be amended to read as follows:
"12.1 The Tenant shall not assign this Lease, either in whole or in part,
nor sublet or mortgage the leasehold interest of Tenant or any part or parts
thereof, provided, however, that this condition shall not prevent the Tenant
from leasing space within the demised premises on an hourly or similar basis
for purposes connected with the use of the demised premises as an ice facility. "
//C2-
- 4.
/G- 4. ARTICLE XIV. MISCELLANEOUS shall be amended to read as follows:
"14.2 The Tenant agrees to permit the Lessor, or its authorized repre-
sentatives to enter upon the demised premises at all reasonable times-for
the purpose of inspecting the same and making necessary repairs to any
facility on the demised premises which the Lessor maintains or operates.
14.6 The Tenant shall , upon termination of this Lease, for any reason
whatsoever, surrender to the Lessor the buildings, structures, fixtures
and building equipment upon the demised premises, together with all
additions, alterations and replacements hereof. "
5. ARTICLE XVIII. WAIVER OF MECHANICS LIEN shall be added and read as
follows:
"18. 1 Before commencing any improvement to the premises, or allowing any
materials, labor or services to be supplied for improvement to the premises,
the Tenant shall provide the Lessor with mechanic lien waivers properly
executed by all suppliers of labor and/or materials. Failure of the Tenant
to provide said waivers shall constitute a breach of this Lease Agreement
and shall entitle the Lessor to any and all remedies hereinbefore set
forth. "
6. ARTICLE XIX. NOTICE shall be added and read as follows:
"19. 1 During the term of this Lease and any extension thereof, Tenant
shall cause to be posted in a conspicuous place on the premises, and in
a manner clearly visible to the public, a notice stating that the Lessor,
the City of Shakopee, is not responsible for the cost of any labor,
materials or supplies provided for use or improvement of the premises . "
7. All other articles in that Lease Agreement dated September 16, 1980,
its terms and conditions , shall remain and be in effect as of the date thereof.
This Amendment to -tease Agreement is authorized and pursuant to Resolution-
-ND —adopted and adjourned in regular session of the Shakopee City Council on the
-_ _-day- of , 1981.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto have caused this Amendment
to Lease to be executed as of the date and year first above written.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
By
Walter C. Harbeck, Mayor
and
By
John Anderson, City Administrator
SHAK-O-VALLEY AMATEUR HOCKEY, INC.
By
Its Present
and
Approved as to form this /3
day .f August, 1981.
By
41, Its Secretary/Treasurer
Philip / . Ka. ing
Assistant S akopee Ci y Attorney
/ /r(2,
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 1981 , by Walter C. Harbeck and John Anderson, respectively, the
Mayor and the City Administrator for the City of Shakopee, a Minnesota municipal
corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 1981, by and
, respectively, the President and Secretary/Treasurer of Shak-O-Valley
Amateur Hockey, Inc. , a Minnesota non-profit corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
if
STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF SCOTT FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
______
ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL
CONTRACTORS, INC. ,
Plaintiff , MUTUAL RELEASE AND
STIPULATION OF
-vs- DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
SHAK-O-VALLEY AMATEUR
HOCKEY, INC. and CITY Court Case No: 81-02925
OF SHAKOPEE,
Defendants.
WHEREAS, the above named parties have pending in this Court,
claims, one against the other, arising out of a certain construction
contract, more specifically described in the Complaint and Bill
of Particulars of Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc. , as Answered,
Counterclaimed and Cross-claimed by the other parties hereto, and;
WHEREAS, Northland Electric Supply Company, has filed with
the appropriate city and county agencies, a mechanic ' s lien covering
certain electrical materials, supplies and apparatuses provided
in the construction and improvement of an ice arena owned and operated
by defendant, Shak-O-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc . ; that the alleged
value of said lien is $9 , 089 . 33; that the mechanic' s lien statement
filed with the Scott County Register of Deeds by plaintiff , Associated
Mechanical Contractors, Inc. , as Document No. 180751 includes the
value of the claim made by Northland Electric Company; the Complaint
of plaintiff in foreclosure of said mechanic' s lien makes claim
for the total amount owed to plaintiff and to Northland Electric
Supply Company, as subcontractor, by the defendants herein, and;
WHEREAS , each of the parties hereto have resolved their
respective differences relating to this litigation and desire to
release and discharge all obligations, liabilities and rights that
they may have against each other, arising out of the construction
contract described above , the mechanic's liens filed, and the pending
litigation.
NOW THEREFORE , in consideration of the Mutual Releases herein-
after contained , along with other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby severally acknowledged
by all the parties hereto, each party hereto voluntarily and knowingly
executes this Mutual Release with the express intent of effecting
the extinguishment of any and all rights, claims, obligations and
liabilities as hereinbefore designed, and more fully set forth as
follows:
1 . Defendant, Shak-O-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc. , shall pay
to Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc. , in full and final satis-
faction of the claims set forth herein the sum of $67,500. 00. In
consideration therefore, and in consideration of the other covenants
and agreements contained herein, Associated Mechanical Contractors,
Inc. agree to save, hold harmless and indemnify the defendants,
and each of them, from any and all claims, damages or liability
incurred by any other materialman, contractor or subcontractor working
under the direction or control of Associated Mechanical Contractors,
Inc. including but not limited to Northland Electric Supply Company,
its successors and assigns. It is understood and agreed that
Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc. shall not be financially
responsible for materialmen , suppliers , contractors or subcontractors
not acting under its supervision or control or not otherwise mentioned
herein.
2 . Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc. , with the intention
of binding itself , its officers, legal representatives, successors
and assigns , hereby expressly releases and forever discharges Shak-
a-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc. , and the City of Shakopee from any
and all claims or liability relating to the construction contract
dated September 16 , 1980; the Bill of Particulars attached to its
Complaint and marked therein as Exhibit "A" ; and that mechanic' s
lien filed by Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc. against Shak-
a-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc. with the Register of Deeds in the
County of Scott, State of Minnesota , on the 26th day of March, 1981 ,
and recorded as Document 180751 .
ti C -
3 . Northland Electric Supply Company with the intention of
binding itself, its officers, legal representatives, successors and
assigns, hereby expressly releases and forever discharges Shak-O-
Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc. , and the City of Shakopee of any and all
claims or liability relating to the construction contract dated
September 16, 1980; the Bill of Particulars attached to the Complaint
of Associated Mechanical Con�ractors, Inc. , and marked therein as its
Exhibit "B" ; and that mechanic ' s lien filed by Northland Electric
Supply, Company against Shak-O-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc. , with the
Register of Deeds in the County of Scott, State of Minnesota, on the
10th day of April , 1981 , and recorded as Document No. 180969 .
4 . Shak-O-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc . , and the City of Shakopee,
with the intention of binding themselves, their officers, legal repre-
sentatives; successors and assigns, hereby, expressly release and
forever discharge Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc. , of any and
all claims or liability relating to the construction contract dated
September 16, 1980; entered into by Shak-O-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc. ,
and Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
5. Shak-O-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc. , and the City of Shakopee,
with the intention of binding themselves, their officers, legal repre-
sentatives, successors and assigns, hereby, expressly release and
forever discharge Northland Electric Supply Company of any and all
claims or liability relating to the construction contract dated
September 16, 1980; entered into by Shak-O-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc . ,
and Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc .
6 . The City of Shakopee hereby expressly releases and further
discharges Shak-O-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc . , from any claims for
breach or violation of the terms of that certain Lease Agreement dated
September 16, 1980, and amended August , 1981 , it being the inten-
tion of the parties hereto that this release and discharge shall be
specifically limited to the claim of Associated Mechanical Contractors,
Inc. , and Northland Electric Supply Company, and no action to cancel
sal,' Lease will be based upon this alleged claim.
// G
7. For and in consideration of the covenants and agreements
contained herein, Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc. , through
its authorized agents and representatives , shall execute, contempora-
neously herewith, a Satisfaction of Mechanic ' s Lien by Corporation,
in the form set out in Exhibit " 1" .
8 . For and in consideration of the covenants and agreements
contained herein, Northland Electric Supply Company, through its
authorized agents and representatives, shall execute, contemporaneously
herewith, a Satisfaction of Mechanic' s Lien by Corporation, in the
form set out in Exhibit " 2" .
ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
B Y 04,144.tiol.
NORTHLAN 'E SUPPLY COMPANY
BY: J l
SHAK-O-VALLEY AMATEUR HOCKEY, INC.
Q
BY: .--1/I— eZz v--- •S011.
AV 0/ ,e - /
Y OF SHAKOPEE
B Y: ,--="1"- ----_ ' GTS f„e_c_... --
i r //',:....-:_)0,,4; - - 7-41A--------
.--
____y
11 G
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this /' day of August, 1981 , before me, a Notary Public
within and for said County, personally appeared �,}pcepL, M. &Ukci -c-„
7
to me known to be the r`P.a.(, e�A of ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL
CONTRACTORS, INC. , the corporation named in the foregoing instrument,
and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said corporation
and 4e acknowledged the said instrument to be the
free act and deed of said corpoat ' `
—TT— .esu CR(
Notaxx.,,,P �--
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss .
-
COUNTY OF fit_,.,'r,>..e��`i,,�
On this -� , day of August, 1981 , before me, a Notary Public
within and for said County, personally appeared 19. 4ti-ii" ? ,
to me known to be the L ;._ of NORTHLAND ELECTRIC SUPPLY
COMPANY , the corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and
that said instrument was signed on behalf of said corporation and
&C acknowledged the said instrument to be the
free act and deed of said corporation.
. . '-7_-;6?; =7/7z
Notary U is .
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss . .
COUNTY OF )
On this /y day of August, 1981 , before me , a Notary PUblic
within and for said County, personally appeared �cr` 21C.1_� cet el,,..,� '��`�'�`'`�
„4 , to me known to be the _L k tiC `( vof SHAK-O-VALLEY AMATEUR
,K-, M LIOCKEY , INC. , the corporation named in the foregoing instrument,
and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said corporation
and `iVV, acknowledged the said instrument to be the
free act and deed e said cor i+
L t4 /7 (L -t. c.
Notary P blic
/79
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
ss .
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
On this day of August, 1981 , before me, a Notary Public,
within and for said County, personally appeared Walter C. Harbeck and
John K. Anderson, to me known to be the Mayor and City Administrator,
respectively, of the City of Shakopee, the corporation named in the
foregoing instrument, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said
corporation and Walter C. Harbeck and John K. Anderson acknowledged the
said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation.
« hI
rr.._ PHILIP T. KANNING A -f
.1.1 NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA d} T
SCOTT COUNTY NotslAy P lic
NA1..• My Ccmmtsslon E.o.res Nov. 7,1952
,'•!! tJ: r, rsignc'+1', a
• . , ` the verified statement and claim for which, /ears rife ` ' 1. 1' tt,ay of Al.)r11 ll -
19 81, was executed by.. ..._ Associated Mc._ GI i ca 1. Con t ract(lrs, Inc.
•
against Shak-O-Valley Amateur Hockey, Inc.
and was filed for record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for the County of....,Scott
and State of Minnesota, on the 26th
day of • March
. . .........
1981, and recorded in.7;?foTtx as Doc. X)K. No.. 180751 W.....xx
, is fully
satisfied, released and discharged, the debt secured thereby hal•+n, been paid in full. 4nd the Register of
Deeds of said County is hereby authorized and directed to discharge the same upon the record thereof,
according to the statutes in. such case provided.
3n Megtimottp EZIbereof, The said corporation has caused these
\ presents to be executed in ils corporate name by its
President and its.. ..t e-i...1.. .... . and its corporate seal to
\
be hereunto affixed this 1`f.` day of,.,�--tiye`-it-I , 19J./. .
/ U
. ...A.SSOC IATED.-i .CHAN1.0 I,....G.ON . CTO S INC.
sPresident
. ,
'tate of ,Hinne�ota, Its L% �/
County of w,a.CfC. j
r. iV `
The foregoing 'nstrument was acknowledged before me this _ _ _,
tial � _
of >� �f. S a / -. <,z -,ec.` . . . . _ corporation,
on behalf of the corporation.
_
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY Ili- ,..4.--,K,.... .
JASPERS, MORIARTY AND WALBURG, P.A.
206 Scott Street (Name) PHILIP T. WINING
Shakopee, MN 5 5 3 P'91dna*) I''i'a' NOTARY PUBLIC—MINNESOTA
SCOTT GOUNMmi
My Commission Expires Novov• 7.1982
L— RXHTRTT "1 "
8ratlataeNar d Wa\atalt'a Usu. Miller-Davis Co., Minneapolis
By eor,.raa.v. rrrr Form No.84-M Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (Revised 1973)
nobs 211 ,men bp ttjege 1ressentz, That a certain Mechanic's Lien now owned
by the undersigned, a corporation under the laws of the State o f. ... . M..-nn.e.s o t.a.
the verified statement and claim for which bears date the . .1.Q.th day of. .April.
19.. 84-was executed by Northland .Electric .Supply -Company.
against Shak.-0-Valley....Ama.te.ur....Hockey Association
and was filed for record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for the County of.....S.Co.t.t
and State of Minnesota, on the 10.t,h. day of......Ap.x..i..l
19 84.and records recorded gatcwoorx....as....Dsacumeot....No. 1.8..0.9.6.9..__ . . ..... ............, ALxxxxxx, is fully
satisfied, released and discharged, the debt secured thereby having been paid in full. 4nd the Register of
Deeds of said County is hereby authorized and directed to discharge the same upon the record thereof,
according to the statutes in such case provided.
In llre%cttmonp ., bertof, The said corporation has caused these
presents to be executed in. its corporate name by its 1
President and its and its corporate seal to
be hereunto affixed this day of , 19....8.1.
Northland Ele • •0- Company
.... ............ .. ..
Its.....j r - President
estate of ';' innesota, } I M. Its
County of il,�,r5/.dl..f0iA/
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me Hits ..Sg
day of_ AK..GYS.7 , 19 _8 " - , by Cy4. 4'7z4e6C.s.E2
of.XoRT.Hl.AN.D....EL.Ec.?11%c.....Sq..i.fri,..YCv0! 1744 /E s u T .4
/� _. corporation,
on behalf of the corporation.
t--' yl
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY
_JASPERS, MORIARTY AND WAT.BIJRG, P .A. i/ . .f...
• (Nam.) . _..
206 Scott Street-
Shakopee, Minnesota (Ate i79
EXHIBIT -2-
I
IN
/1
Memo To : Mayor and Council
From: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE : Donald Techs Driveway
Date : August 15 , 1981
Introduction :
City Council , at its August 4, 1981 meeting, instructed the City
Administrator to meet with Mr. Tech regarding his easterly
driveway which he had formerly used for storing vehicles etc .
Background :
I met with Mr. Tech August 13 , 1981 and we reviewed his problem
with this additional driveway on the easterly edge of his property.
There are three problems :
1--When 7th Street was extended the grade was changed and the
curb cut is now 8-12 inches lower than the earth behind it leading
to his property;
2--There is an SPUC light pole blocking the driveway entrance ; and
3--Mr. Tech maintains that the northerly end of this driveway was
cut down , excavated out , when outlot A was constructed as
a holding pond .
It is difficult to determine what kind of driveway Mr. Tech had prior
to the extension of 7th Street . To resolve the three problems above
it would require :
1--Cutting down the earth immediately behind the driveway curb cut
and pushing the earth to the rear to provide some of the fill
Mr. Tech is looking for, estimated at $200.00 ,
2--Move the light pole 4-5 feet to the east estimated at $65 .
(SPDC estimate) , and
3--A few additional loads of fill 2-3 to bring the rear on
northerly end of his driveway up to its original grade ,
estimated at $75 .00 .
Recommendation :
I recommend that this work be done while the alley contractor is still
working on the Eastview Project and that the cost be charged to the
Eastview Project , or, General Fund Contingencies if this appears to be
beyond normal project related expenses . The Gen . Fund balance is $44,571 .
Action Required :
ot, 'on authorizing driveway excavating, filland the moving of a city
1ht: pole for Donald Tech at an estimated cost of $ 340.00 to be
charmed to the Eastvi e,J Project .
JKA/gs