HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/11/1981 I
TENTATIVE AGENDA
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
ADJ.REG. SESSION AUGUST 11 , 1981
Mayor Harbeck presiding
1] Roll Cail at 7 : 30 P.M.
2 ] Res . No . 1889, A Resolution Declaring The Cost To Be Assessed And
Ordering The Pieparation Of Proposed Assessment 80-11 (TH101 Watermain)
3 ] 7 : 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Proposed Assessment on the N 1/2 of Sec. 8
by Sanitary Sewer (Hauer Trail Laterals) 80-1
Memo . regarding Hauer laterals SAC charge
4] Resolution No . 1893 , Adopting Assessments for 80-1 N 1/2 of Sec . 8
Sanitary Sewer Laterals
5] 8: 00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Request for Proposals to Provide Cable
Communications Services to the City of Shakopee
a] Open public hearing
b] Hear input from public and Councilpersons
c ] Adopt Request for Proposals OR Continue public hearing
d ] Close public hearing
Bring Ordinance and Request for Proposals
6] 8: 30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Proposed Assessment on the VIP Sanitary
Sewer Interceptor 81-1
7 ] Resolution No . 1891 , Adopting Assessments for VIP Interceptor
8] 9: 00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Proposed Assessment on Holmes Street
Curb, Gutter , Sanitary Sewer and Sidewalk 80-3
9] Resolution No . 1892 , Adopting Assessments for 80-3 Holmes Street
Improvements
10] Other Business :
a]
b]
c]
11 ] Adjourn to Tuesday, August 18th at 7 : 30 P.M.
John K. Anderson
City Administrator
MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
RE: STH 101 Watermain 80-11
DATE: July 30, 1981
Introduction
The work on the above project has progressed sufficiently
to commence the assessment process . Mr. Van Hout has informed
me that Mr. Price, Consulting Engineer, is preparing the assess-
ment roll .
Background
In order to assess the projects it is necessary to adopt a
resolution certifying the amount of the assessment and to direct
the City Clerk and Project Engineer to prepare assessment rolls
for the project .
Recommendation
Adopt resolution number 1889, declaring the cost to be
assessed ordering the preparation of proposed assessments and
specifying the date of the public hearing.
JSC/jam
NOTE: Should you have any questions regarding the attached
Summary of Project Costs , please talk with John
Anderson prior to the Council meeting on Tuesday.
Main Office 71.6066
UBURBAN il 6875 Highway No. 65 N. E.
nNOINEERINO 1, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432
J - _ - INC. ___—
South Office 890.6510
Civil, Municipal & Environmental Engineering 1101 Cliff Road
[)° Land Surveying • Land Planning • Soil Testing Burnsville, Minnesota 55337
July 31 ,1981
S78-85
SUMMARY OF PROJECTS COSTS
T.H. 101 TRUNK WATERMAIN EXTENSION - PROJ . NO. 80-11
1 . CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT COST $172 ,568 .05
2 . CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES
Basic Fee $14,323 . 15
Staking of work $ 3 ,875 . 80
Other Services $ 2 ,134.00
Assessment Roll (Est . ) $ 2 ,500. 00
As-Built Record (Est . ) $ 1 ,500. 00
$ 24,332 .95
3 . CITY COSTS
Shakopee Public Utilities $ 5 ,975 .00
City Administration $ 1 ,760 . 00
City Engineering $ 1 ,555 .00
Advertising $ 150. 00
Bond Consultant $ 2 ,070. 00
Bond Printing $ 145 .00
Bond Attorney $ 270.00
Moody ' s Review $ 245 .00
Capitalized Interest $ 7 ,045 .00
$ 19 ,215 .00
Total Add-On Costs $ 43 ,547 . 95
( =25 . 24% of contract )
TOTAL IMPROVEMENT $216 ,116 . 00
Page 1 of 3
Robert Minder, Reg. Eng. E.A. Rathbun, Reg. Suru. Wm. E. Price, Reg. Eng. Gary R. Harris, Reg. Suru. Peter J. Molinaro, Reg. Eng.
Wm. E. Jensen, Reg. Eng. William J. Brezinsky, Reg. Eng. H. William Rogers, Reg. Suru. Bruce A Paterson, Reg. Eng. Daniel P. Johnson, Reg. Eng.
Kim W. Waldof, Reg. Eng.
7/31/81
T. H. 101 TRUNK WATERMAIN - PROJ. NO. 80-11
SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT
A. ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE
12" BENEFIT 901 . 08 ' @ $36 . 35/ft . = $ 32 ,754 .26
8" BENEFIT 4494. 94 ' @ $29 . 16/ft . = $131 ,072 .45
Totals 5396 .02 ' $163 ,826 . 71
B. TRUNK AREA BENEFIT
103 . 37 Ac . @ $435 .00/Ac . = $ 44,965 . 95
C. SPECIAL SERVICES
3-12" Service @ $2 ,211 . 36/ea. = $ 6 ,634.09
8- 8" Service @ $1 ,457 . 32/ea . = $11 ,658 . 53
1- 6" Service @ $1 ,280. 58/ea. = $ 1 ,280. 58
1- 2" Service @ $ 381 . 98/ea. = $ 381 . 98
Total Services $ 19 ,955 . 18
TOTAL ASSESSMENT $228 , 747. 84
Page 2 of 3
7/31/81
T. H. 101 TRUNK WATERMAIN - PROJ. NO. 80-11
Calculation for Assessment Resolution
1 . Contract Price $172 ,568 .00
2 . Expenses Incurred $ 43 ,548 .00
Sub-Total $216 ,116 .00
3 . Expenses to be incurred in future
for trunk system.
Area Trunk Charge $ 44 965 .00
Project cost-pipe only $196 ,145 .00
Actual Ass . Cost (8" ) ( - ) $163 ,827 .00
Balance = 12" Trunk portion (-) $ 32 , 318 .00
Future Trunk Cost allocated to this project $ 12 ,648 .00
TOTAL COST • Tc b .455 ss $228 , 764.00
cAy 3a ,31
To TA o 0+- Za1 f}e'OL9c;h) e "nt '� //OS"'
Page 3 of 3
RESOLUTION NO . 1889
A Resolution Declaring The Cost To Be Assessed And
Ordering 'The Preparation Of Proposed Assessment 80-11
(STH 101 Watermain)
WHEREAS , a contract has been let for the improvement of
STH 101 between the East line of Cretex Industrial Park 1st Addi-
tion and the East line of Hall ' s 1st Addition by trunk watermain
extension, and the contract price for such improvements is $172 , 568.00
and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such
improvements is $43 , 548. 00 and the expenses incurred or to be
incurred for area trunk charge amounts to $ 44, 965 .00
so that the total cost of the improvement will be $261 ,082 .00 and
of this cost the SPDC will pay $32 , 318 .00 as its share .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA:
1 . The cost of such improvement to be specially assessed
is hereby declared to be $228 , 763 .00.
2 . The City Clerk, with the assistance of the Project
Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially
assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot , piece
or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to
cash valuation , as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of
such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection.
3 . That the City Clerk shall , upon the completion of such
proposed assessment , notify the City Council thereof.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
1 . That a hearing shall be held on the 1st day of Septem-
ber, 1981 , in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 8: 30 PM to pass
upon such porposed assessments and at such time and place all per-
sons owning property affected by such improvements and proposed
assessments will be given an opportunity to be heard with 'reference
to such assessment .
2 . That the City Clerk is hereby directed to cancel a no-
tice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published
once in the official newspaper of the City of Shakopee at least two
Resolution No. 1889
Page 2
weeks prior to the hearing and he shall state in the notice the
total cost of the improvements . He shall also cause mailed notice
of such hearing to be given to the owner of each parcel described
in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing.
Adopted in adjourned regular session of the City Council of
the City of Shakopee , Minnesota , held this 4th day of August , 1981 .
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of , 1981 .
City Attorney
MEMO TO: John Anderson
City Administrator
FROM: H. R. Spurrier ,.�r�,� / l
City Engineer
RE: 1980-1 Public Improvement Program
Hauer Trail Laterals
DATE: August 7, 1981
Introduction:
Attached is Resolution No. 1893, a resolution adopting the assessments
for the above-referenced improvement district. As a result of inquiries
made regarding the cost of technical services and pursuant to the request
of City Council, an itemized list of expenses for the above-referenced
project are attached. The original cost summary included $32,063.89 for
technical services. That amount included $8,501.00 for a feasibility
report which will be assessed to future development in the north half of
Section 8, but, is not a part of the present improvement district cast. This
improvement district sharesa part of that cost but that cost is included
in the basic services of the consultant.
One other adjustment made to the total cost to be assessed was the adjustment
made to right-of-way acquisition cost, that amount is $12,699.20 which is
$400.80 less than the estimate that was used in the assessment computation.
Subsequent to the computation and after the notice was prepared, the City
Attorney submitted the formal accounting and award by the Court for the
condemnation action. The actual amount is $12,699.20 which is $I+00.80 less
than the assumed value used in the assessment computation.
The affect of these revisions reduces the total cost of the project to
$97,682.82. A more detailed itemized list of these expenses is attached
hereto.
Should there be no objections to the assessment roll as amended for the
August 4+, 1981 Council meeting, City Council should adopt Resolution No. 1893.
Recommendation:
City staff recommends that Resolution No. 1893, A Resolution Adopting The
Assessment For The 1980-1 Public Improvements Program - North One-half of
Section 8-115-22 (Hauer Trail Laterals) be adopted.
HRS/jiw
Attachment
3
John Anderson Hauer Trail Laterals
Page 2 August 7, 1981
ATTACHMENT
Contract Costs $ 46,806.73
Suburban
Basic Services 4,709.00
Easement Descriptions 365.50
Survey and Staking 2,793.50
Revise Drawings 201.00
Additional Meetings 1,353.38
Patchin
Appraisal 2,000.00
Court Appearance 200.00
Legal Services for Condemnation 1,601.67
Technical Services for Condemnation 1,857.00
Inspection 6,901.00
Assessment Computations & Notices 430.00
Printing 1,150.34
TOTAL $97,682.73
Front Foot Cost $ 25.91
Hauer Assessment $25,826.62
Other Lots $ 2,763.70
-3
RESOLUTION NO. 1893
A Resolution Adopting Assessment
1980-1 Public Improvement Program
North One-Half Of Section 8-115-22
Hauer Trail Laterals
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the
City Council of the City of Shakopee met and heard and passed upon all
objections to the proposed assesments of:
That part of Section 8-115-22 lying South of
County Road 16; North of the proposed Highway
101 Bypass; East of the former Chicago,
Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad, East
of Hauer's 1st Addition and West of Jasper Road
by sanitary sewer lateral.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1. That such proposed assessment together with any amendments thereof,
a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted
and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein
and each tract therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the
proposed improvements in the amount of the assessments levied against it.
2. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first installment to be payable
on or before the first Monday in January, 1982 and shall bear interest at
the rate of 11.75 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this
assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added the interest
on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31,
1982, and to each subsequent installment when due shall be added the interest
for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to
the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire
assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of this
resolution; he may thereafter pay to the County Treasurer the installment and
interest in process of collection on the current tax list, and he may pay
the remaining principal balance of the assessment to the City Treasurer.
r
Resolution No. 1893 Page -2-
'4. The Clerk shall file the assessment rolls pertaining to this
assessment in his office and shall certify annually to the County Auditor
on or before October 10th of each year the total amount of installments
and interest which are to become due in the following year on the assessment
on each parcel of land included in the assessment roll.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
1981.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this
day of , 1981.
City Attorney
MEMO TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: Hauer Lateral/SAC Charges
DATE: August 7, 1981
Introduction
Council directed staff to research the history of SAC charges ,
or their equivalent , for the above mentioned subdivision in Eagle
Creek Township.
Historical Background
It is helpful in sorting this problem out to begin with a
listing of key dates .
1 . The Metro Waste Control Commission (MWCC) was created in
1969 and the first cost (billing) to local jurisdictions
was in 1970. There were no SAC charges at this time as
we know them today.
2 . Scott County took over Eagle Creek Township building
permits in January of 1970. Prior to that time the Town-
ship handled its own permits . Kathy Bongard, the County
Building Department Secretary, doesn' t remember the
County having billed or paying any SAC charges because
of Anthony . Gnerre ' s letter dated January 21 , 1974
(attached) .
3 . Stage one of the City Annexation of Eagle Creek Township
took place in October of 1971 , and Stage two in July
of 1972 .
4. In January of 1973 the Metro Waste Control Commission
instituted the SAC charge concept . Prior to that time ,
1970 to January of 1973 , there was a "Reserve Capacity
Charge" based upon total debt service that was billed
annually to each jurisdiction on the system and generally
paid by the jurisdiction with the normal user fee charges ,
that is , the people using the system paid for it .
Review of Township Activities
By the dates above it is clear that the SAC charge concept ,
a charge tied to building permits, and sewer connection permits
according to Don Blumn of MWCC, did not exist when Eagle Creek
Township was controlling its building permits so no fees would
have been collected. Furthermore , the County has not been billed
for or paid any SAC charges during the period it has managed
Eagle Creek Township building permits . Therefore, we can conclude
that no SAC charges were paid.
The second question is whether or not the Township paid any
"Reserve Capacity Charge" (See #4 above) through general taxes
before the annexation, i .e . between 1970 and October 1971 . It
seems unlikely that the township did. However, if it did, it
would have been debt service charged with the annual user fees
Hauer Lateral/SAC Charges
August 7 , 1981
Page 2
and would have been tied to only the current users , Valley Indus-
trial Park properties .
To further check these facts out I contacted Elmer Marshall ,
Harry:Weinandt and Bill Sehmoehel, all former Township officials .
Mr. Weinandt couldn' t remember very clearly, but recalled that
the issue was a problem and that the Township had to pay some-
thing. Elmer Marshall stated clearly that no Township citizen
paid a SAC charge either individually or through the township
(ie . general township levy) . He said the Township was considering
a $1 million bond issue for the MWCC Prior Lake and Jackson Interceptors
but that when MWCC couldn ' t guarantee construction in a timely
fashion the Township voted the issue down . Bill Schmoehel also re-
called the bond issue and its defeat . He, however, thought that
the Township did pay something for a period of roughly 8 months
(paid annually) for homes inside the MUSA line even though they
weren ' t hooked up. Shakopee has never been inside the MUSA line
so Bill ' s recollection is possibly faulty. He probably means
Sewer Service Area line established by Met Council in 1970.
Finally, Ray Odde from MWCC is confident that a house that
existed prior to 1970 hasn' t paid a SAC charge or "Reserve Capacity
Charge". We do not have the old Township records to determine if
the Township paid anything for either of these charges through
a general levy.
Summary
The alternatives and action requested are still the same as
those on my memo dated July 30, 1981 , which is attached.
JKA/jam
Attachment
8.0 gaiSett.• �
�"�• 4
Twin crr1�e
350 Metro Square Building, 7th & Robert Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Area 612, 222-8423
January 21, 1974
Ken Riesgraff
Zoning Administrator
Scott County
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Dear Mr. Riesgraff:
This is to confirm our telephone conversation regarding communities who are
subject to SAC charges.
The current Board policies provide that municipalities not discharging dir-
ectly or indirectly into the Metropolitan Disposal System will be allocated
reserve capacity and reserve capacity charges only from and after the date
the Board awards a construction contract for facilities which will provide
sewer service to that municipality. Enclosed is a copy of the SAC manual
which describes the policies, interpretation and implementation of the SAC
rules and regulations.
Should you desire any additional information, please advise.
Sincerely,
Anthony C. Gne e
Comptroller
Metropolitan Sewer Board
ACG:jr
encl.
An Agency of the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area
Anoka County •Caner County •Dakota County•Hennepin County•Ramsey County•Scott County•Washington County
lSJ
MEMO TO: Mayor and Council 3
FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator
RE: SAC 'Charges for Hauer Addition Sewer Service Connections
DATE: July 30, 1981
Introduction
At the July 21 , 1981 Council meeting I mentioned that staff
had determined that the Hauer Addition homes currently being con-
nected to the new Hauer Lateral Sewer should pay SAC charges .
This decision was based upon the findings that the SAC charges ,
except for those noted on the attached map, had not been paid by
the City when we paid approximately $26 ,000 in overdue SAC charges
earlier this spring. Eldon Rienke then asked staff to check the
minutes of the first Public Hearing of the Hauer Lateral Improve-
ments, because he recalled that the residents were told that they
wouldn ' t have to pay SAC charges .
Findings
The minutes of the Public Hearing have been transcribed and
are attached. It is clear from the minutes and listening to the
tape that Bill Price and Councilman Rienke said there would be
no SAC charge . I also contacted Bill Price and Doug Reeder re-
garding this matter and both of them could not recall (or believe)
that the City would have exempted the improvement area residents
from the SAC charge . In fact , both recalled that the city was
discussing its own "connection charge" at the time and wondered
if the "connection charge" being considered hadn ' t been what they
said would be exempted . The minutes are clear that various "con-
nection charges" were discussed, but that SAC charges were men-
tioned specifically .
Conclusion
I have spoken with the City Attorney about the above mentioned
findings and he feels that we have a real problem if SAC charges
were specifically mentioned . It is his feelings that public hear-
ings are" the the purpose of discussing matters just as this and
that if we clearly stated "SAC charges are exempt", rather than
the more general, "connection charges are exempt" then we ' ll have
to live with it .
Summary
There is no doubt that the City will have to pay the SAC
charges (note new monthly reporting form attached to Phyllis ' s
memo with a column headed "Sewer Connection Permit SAC Units") .
This will amount to roughly $10, 625 (25 homes x $425 SAC) that
will have to be paid by the Sewer Fund .
SAC Charges for Hauer Addition
July 30, 1981
Page 2
Alternatives
Pay the SAC charges from the Sewer Fund or charge the resi-
dents with the potential that they can make a case against such
a charge if it is appealed .
Action Requested
Motion directing staff to pay the SAC charges due from the
Hauer Lateral Sewer Service Connection from the Sewer Fund .
Attachment
JKA/jam
L oLL . u 4 ,-cc kr-miler Laterals ) Sanitary
` c Sewer 80-1
1 •,/ 4-O
\ , /
zl
o 1.�( •
j Assessabi
y ,o % e Area
iv ii
�� 'F' , j., „� -, << ,, �a, L f4-c
, \- '..:::.:.::::::::::::::-.I......::.:::::::-.:::::
\ ' a
,,...::
:.yr.. .'. r:'•.•,.
.. .
1 \ _______ .........Q.1.......:......./........ . ?.._....,... ....i..,,....:...............,...1... ......_...:::..„,...........:..,..........:.:::..:...........,.. ,
1
1
p.._.::.:.............. .:........•..,......!......•..:,.:.•:,....:.,....:... .. ... .:::.............:„...........:...:...:....:.:„...........:...:...:.
,....y.....:.......:....................................,...„.......,. .:,................:::.::::.........,„ ............................:....::„..........:..........................:...:.............:„:„:....:..:.....
1 \
...•.......:.:...:.::.:..................:......:............,....:.....„....,...:......:...........:...........:......:.:::,....................,...."....... ....../........:................:...............................................:..........................::,....
i \ , . . .. .. .. .. • .. . .•..............
i ,
., 4
T MA
S R
..:::................ ...........:.........,..:.
I - -- CEM.
-1
•
•
•
v , \
i _
1
.._
. _ _.
i .
,.
•
. . .
�`,_
ag8 ROW
,•.
• ......
— \\_. ,
\ 10 , ® Yp1
1
1 , ___ , ___ 1 . ._ i._
1,\. \ ....._.
, •
.. _ . . _ . \ . . _, ___ -- -. . _
_ __
_.
. _
_ __ -
_.
__ __ . .
-\\ . , . _ _ , .
_______ _
. _
1
_ ___
. \
.\ . ., ,
.,
i
, 1
,•
, , . \ . . .
1 .
,.
I , \ .
•
1
Joe Theis: . What is the hook up charge?
Eldon Rienke : The Hauer project will not have one because of
a, basically many of the houses in this area
the grandfather made without any sewer availibility
charges .
Bill Price : Maybe this is something the rest of the people are
not aware of.
Eldon: A good example of this is in I i'/7 , the cost was $375 per
lot . Now it is a little over $500 per availibility of the
facility of the
Bill : If the house is already there you don ' t need one .
Eldon: This particular arca now w i i not, have to pay that SAC -
Charge .
AC --
Charge .
Bill : If the house is already there , you won ' t have to pay the
charge . It ' s a charge that is paid at the time you pull
a building permit to build the house . So a vacant lot will
have to pay i t .
Eldon: That is basically the thing that was brought up . That is
a $500 payable . That anybody else building or getting a
building permit today and building a new home would have
to pay .
A comment was made by Joe Theis . Not, understandable .
Eldon: We are also discussing the reconstruction project for the
city of ?
That in order to fund such a program that in the future as
not only would an individual get an building permit applica,
sewer availibility charge for federal sewers facilities ,
but also for the maintenance and reconstruction of its own
• process in the city . In that, another hook up charge would
also be charged at this time .
A question was asked by Joe Theis . it was not understandable .
Eldon: Those are the other options that we are looking at that I
was referring to so that there would be at a later date be
another fee besides the original $500 that we are not
looking at this time and so that is another statement made
at this
OF S A P E E
41129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379•
Ity
''ll�J1,• UPJ/
MEMO
TO: John Anderson, City Administrator
FROM: Phyllis hnudtsen . Bide . Secretary
SUBJECT: L; C MWCC
DATE:_ July ''l, 191
introduction :
As you requested , 1 will try and explain what cur
responsibility to the MWCC is on SAC charges for existing
houses and what, we have done in I.ho p:,:;t ie. Bluff Ave.
for example .
Background :
Each month a report is sent to the MWCC listing the number
or permits issued within that t, mon t h that a SAC charge was
collected on.
In J:rnu;rr,y or 1 (181 the MWCC st'iI now 1'nrm:, with !a new
category entitled "SEWER CONNECTION PERMIT" . This means
that whenever a house that was not car, sewer before but is
now hooking up to sewer must; be listed on this form and
charged the $425.00 SAC unit charge .
When the Bluff Ave . project was put in I collected the
SAC charge on the Plumbing Permit and we just paid the
fee to MWCC but didn' t list, the nrrmbnr at.• Sewer Connection
Only on any form of any kind.
The Hauer Project I would think should he treated the same
way as 13l ut•f in that the people hooking up should have to
pay and duly recorded cn this new form -- unless you have
found the conversation on the tape of the Public Hearing
prior to the Hauer Assessment.
MWCC-73
RESERVE CAPACITY CHARGE
MONTHLY REPORT
Municipality —_—_.__—_ ______ _. �•e to: Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
Month of_ — —
350 Metro Square
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
GUILD G SEWER
ITEM TYPE OF UNIT PER IT CONNECTION •TAt UNIT RESERVE CAPACITY
SAC HITS PERMIT SA UNITS CHARGE CHARGES
SAC UNITS
A Single Family House $425.00
(Per attached Form MWCC-75D)
(Ea. Housing Unit = —
Duplexes 1 Sac Unit) $425.00
(Per attached Form MWCC-75D)
Townhouses (Ea. Housing Unit =
1 Sac Unit) $425.00
(Per attached Form MWCC-75D)
B Apartments (Ea. Housing Unit
1 Sac Unit) $340.00
(Per attached Form MWCC•75D)
C Public Housing
1. Single Family $318.75
(Per attached Form MWCC•75D)
(Ea. Housing Unit
2. Duplexes 1 Sac Unit) $318.75
(Per attached Form MWCC-75D)
3. Townhouses (Ea. Housing Unit ,--
1 Sac Unit) $318.75
(Per attached Form MWCC•75D)
4. Apartments (Ea. Housing Unit —
1 Sac Unit) $255.00
(Per attached Form MWCC•75D)
D Commercial & Institutional
(Per attached Form MWCC— 75A) $425.00
E Industrial
(Per attached Form MWCC-75B • 1 & 2) $425.00
F Demolition Credit
(Per attached Form MWCC-75C - 1)
- ( )
Sib-Total --- Reserve Capacity Charges $
Administrative Fee (1'7 of sub-total) Subtract $ (
Net Amount Due $
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and represents the
activities for the month indicated above.
Name ——
White copy—Return to MWCC -- --_---- ------
Dot• Title. _-- .
Y•Ilow copy.— Municipality copy
MEMO TO: John Anderson
City Administrator
r
FROM: H. R. Spurrier
City Engineer `
RE: 1981-1 Public Improvement Program
VIP Sanitary Sewer Interceptor
DATE: August 7, 1981
Introduction:
At the conclusion of the public hearing of the proposed assessment for
the VIP Sanitary Sewer Interceptor, City Council may adopt Resolution
No. 1891, a resolution adopting the assessment roll for the above-
referenced improvement.
Background:
The resolution is attached merely as a convenience and should there be
any additional questions that must be resolved prior to adoption of the
assessment, those alterations could be made August 17, 1981 and still
not jeopardize certification to the County in sufficient time.
There has been insufficient time to review the entire foremat of the
assessing resolution, therefore, any additional recommendations will be
made prior to the hearing August 11th.
Should there be no objections to the assessment roll distributed for the
August 4th Council meeting, City Council should adopt Resolution No. 1891.
Recommendations:
City staff recommends that Resolution No. 1891, A Resolution Adopting
The Assessment For the 1981-1 Public Improvement Project - VIP Sanitary
Sewer Interceptor, be adopted.
HRS/jiw
Attachment
Draft 8/7/81
RESOLUTION NO. 1891
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS 1981-1
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM V. I .P . INTERCEPTOR
WHEREAS , a contract has been let for the installation of the
V. I .P. Sanitary Sewer Interceptor beginning at a section of the
existing Shakopee interceptor lying between County Road 83 and
County Road 17 thence proceeding southerly to County Road 16
thence westerly to Marschall Road and there terminating; and
WHEREAS, the total cost of the improvements will be
$879 , 912 . 65 ; and
WHEREAS , property outside the corporate limits of the City
will benefit in the amount of $67 ,969. 35, and since the City
chooses not to assess said property at this time, the City will
pay the $76, 969. 35 now and will be reimbursed by collecting an
area fee from the first 610 acres connecting to the interceptor
at the time of construction of a lateral sanitary sewer; and
WHEREAS , the City proposes to defer assessments in the amount
of for those properties lying between CR-17 and CR-79
who cannot now benefit from the construction of a lateral sanitary
sewer to the interceptor because of the City' s Comprehensive Plan;
and
WHEREAS , pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by
law, the City Council of the City of Shakopee met and heard and
passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment of the said
V. I .P . Sanitary Sewer Interceptor.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1 . That such proposed assessments together with any amend-
ments thereof, as listed on assessment Roll "A" , is hereby accepted
and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named
therein and each tract therein included is hereby found to be
benefitted by the proposed improvements in the amount of the assess-
ments levied against it .
RESOLUTION NO. 1891
Page 2
2 . Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual install-
ments extending over a period of ten years , the first installment
to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1982 , and
shall bear interest at the rate of 8 3/4 percent per annum from
the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the
first installment shall be added the interest on the entire assess-
ment from the date of this resolution until December 31 , 1982 , and
to each subsequent installment when due shall be added the interest
for one year on all unpaid installments .
3 . The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time
prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay
the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accured
to the date of payment , to the City treasurer, except that no
interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within
thirty (30) days from the adoption of this resolution; he may
thereafter pay to the County Treasurer the installment and interest
in process of collection on the current tax list, and he may pay
the remaining principal balance of the assessment to the City
Treasurer.
4. The Clerk shall file the assessment rolls pertaining to
this assessment as listed on Assessment Roll "A" in his office
and shall certify annually to the County Auditor on or before
October 10th of each year the total amount of installments and
interest which are to become due in the following year on the
assessment on each parcel of land included in the assessment roll .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT:
1 . That such proposed assessments together with any amend-
ments thereof , as listed on Assessment Roll "B" attached hereto
and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute
the special assessment against the lands named therein and each
tract therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the
proposed improvements in the amount of the assessments levied
against it;
2 . That such assessments are hereby deferred until January
1st , 1985 , when sanitary sewer can be extended to the area, in
accordance with the City' s Comprehensive Plan.
RESOLUTION NO. 1891
Page 3
3 . That such assessments shall be payable in equal annual
installments ,extending over a period of ten years , the first in-
stallment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January,
1986 (or when sanitary sewer can be extended to the area in ac-
cordance with the City ' s Comprehensive Plan) and shall bear interest
at the rate of 8 3/4 percent per annum from the date of the adoption
of this assessment resolution to the first installment shall be
added the interest for the calendar year in which the first assess-
ments are collected by the County Treasurer and to each subsequent
installment when due shall be added the interest for one year on all
unpaid installments . The interest which has accumulated from the
date of this resolution until the end of 1985 (or when sanitary
sewer can be extended to the area in accordance with the City' s
Comprehensive Plan) shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over the same 10 year period as the principal , shall be
in addition to the principal , but shall not compound interest .
4. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time
prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay
the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accured
to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no
interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within
thirty (30) days from the adoption of this resolution; he may there-
after pay to the County Treasurer the installment and interest in
process of collection on the current tax list, and he may pay the
remaining principal balance of the assessment to the City Treasurer.
5 . The Clerk shall file the assessment rolls pertaining to
this assessment as listed on Assessment Roll "B" in his office and
shall certify annually to the County Auditor on or before October
10th of each year the total amount of installments and interest
which are to become due in the following year on the assessment on
each parcel of land included in the assessment roll .
BE IN FURTHER RESOLVED:
1 . ) That an additional capacity of C.F.S. has
been provided in the interceptor for future use and the cost of
providing this additional interceptor capacity is $67 ,969.35
which amountshall be recouped in the future for areas designated
Vol the future by means of a service and/or connection charge.
is
RESOLUTION NO. 1891
Page 4
2 . That when such areas are designated for a service and/or
connection charge an interest from the date of this resolution,
at the rate of 8 3/4 percent per annum, shall be added to the
initial service and./or connection charge . After this point, no
additional interest shall be charged.
3 . That when areas are designated in the future as being
benefited by the interceptor service and/or connection charges
shall be set by the City Council .
Adopted in session of the Shakopee City
Council of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
1981 .
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Administrator
Approved as to form this
day of , 1981 .
City Attorney
MEMO TO: John Anderson
City Administrator
FROM: H. R. Spurrier 14` x+
City Engineer
RE: Holmes Street Reconstruction
DATE: August 7, 1981
Introduction:
At the conclusion of the public hearing on the proposed assessment of
the balance of the work for the Holmes Street Reconstruction Project, City
Council may adopt Resolution No. 1892 , a resolution adopting the assessment
roll for the Holmes Street Reconstruction Project.
Background:
The resolution is attached merely as a convenience and should there be any
additional questions that must be resolved prior to the adoption of the
assessment, those alterations could be made on August 17, 1981 and still
not jeopardize certification to the County in sufficient time.
Should there be no objections to the assessment roll distributed for the
August 4th Council meeting, City Council could adopt Resolution No. 1892 .
Recommendation:
City staff recommends that Resolution No. 1892 , A Resolution Adopting
The Assessment For The 1980-3 Public Improvement Program - Holmes Street
Reconstruction For Sanitary Sewer Service Lines, Curb & Gutter and Sidewalk,
be adopted.
HRS/jiw
Attachment
17
•
RESOLUTION NO. 1892
A Resolution Adopting Assessments
1980-3 Public Improvement Program
Holmes Street Reconstruction
(Sanitary Sewer Service Linen Curb & Gutter and Sidewalk)
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law,
the City Council of the City of Shakopee met and heard and passed upon all
objections to the proposed assessments of:
Holmes Street between the South line of 2nd Avenue and
the North line of 10th Avenue by curb & gutter, and
sanitary sewer; and k_>1oeu)A LK
Second Avenue between the West line of Holmes Street and
the East line of Fuller Street by sidewalk; and
Sixth Avenue between the West line of Fuller Street
and the East line of Atwood Street by sidewalk
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1. That such proposed assessment together with any amendments thereof,
a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby
accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named
therein and each tract therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by
the proposed improvements in the amount of the assessments levied against it.
2. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first installment to be
payable on or before the first onday in Januar , 1982, and s all bei
‘ifeezzy 41,,e(
ts
- ,erg- g75-% -t7l.0
intereson the entire assess ent from the date of this res ution until hit
1 December 31, 1982 and to each subsequent installment when due shall be added j
/ / /„
the interest for one year on all unpaid installments. c� I '
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to (4,[9 6"w
Yajdf , ,
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of , i / .
4 i
the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment ��/ /� /
IF
to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire ,
assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of this resolution;
he may thereafter pay to the County Treasurer the installment and interest
in process of collection on the current tax list, and he may pay the remaining
principal balance of the assessment to the City Treasurer.
1
Resolution No. 1892 Page -2-
)4. The Clerk shall file the assessment rolls' pertaining to this
assessment in his office and shall certify annually to the County Auditor on
or before October 10th of each year the total amount of installments and
interest which are to become due in the following year on the assessment
on each parcel of land included in the assessment roll.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the
City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of
1981.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form this day of
, 1981.
City Attorney