Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/04/1981 MEMO TO: Mayor and Council FROM: John K. Anderson , City Administrator RE: Non_Agenda Informational Items DATE : July 30, 1981 1 . According to the Budget Calendar Council approved, Council was to receive the first draft of the City Administrator' s 1982 Budget recommendations August 11 , 1981 . We now have four public hearings scheduled for that night so the Budget will be presented at the August 28th Worksession which had originally been the second evening set aside for budget work. 2 . • .• . • • . . . . • route changes to seLv he Senior Ctt1GCL15 NigI1L i5e • Lettet- attechcd. This item is on the 8/4/81 agenda. 3 . I have been appointed to the League of Minnesota Cities "Rev- enue Sources Committee . " I plan to talk about the per capita inequities in the local government aid formula at our first meeting. If there is anything you'd like me to bring up let me know. 4. Lou Van Hout has informed me that it was the gas company that was in working on the newly laid sod on the Highway 101 pro- ject . They were putting in a service to the new warehouse east of 1 and 44 Liquors . It was the City or the Contractor. 5 . Attached is the Fund Balance Summary for the period ending June 30, 1981 . 6 . Attached is an East End Park Project Report from George . 7 . Attached is a State Shade Tree Report on Shakopee ' s Shade Tree Program. 8. Attached is an Association of Metro Municipalities Newsletter regarding the 1981 Annual meeting. 9. Attached is a notice from the Association of Metro Municipali- ties regarding some Board Variancies . Let me know if you'd like to have your name submitted. 10. Jack Coller was in Court all week so several of the items he was to have ready for the August 4, 1981 , agenda won ' t be completed until August 18, 1981 .. 11 . Attached are the minutes of the July 8, 1981 Police Commis- sion meeting. 12 . Attached are the minutes of the July 14, 1981 Eastside Park Steering Committee. 13 . Attached are the minutes of the July 9 , 1981 , Board of Adjust- ments and Appe Lls meeting. Non-Agenda Information Items July 30, 1981 Page 2 14. Attached are the minutes of the July 15, 1981 , Ad Hoc Cable Communications Committee meeting. 15 . Attached is a copy of the memo I sent to all employees re- garding the change in vacation policy. I hope it clears matters up. 16. Attached is the monthly calendar of meetings for August . 17 . We received the 1982 Contract Demands from the Public Works Department Local No. 320. There are three demands covering wages , insurance and uniforms . I will bring the demands before Council with Management ' s recommendations in August . 18 . Attached are the minutes of the July 9 and July 23, 1981 Planning Commission meeting. b a) ,,,, ,-.1 a) CO rl r-1 ,-1 N O rn ^ ^ .. N,---,4,-... Ci 001 VO CM CD O0 ) I CO - CO .1- I I 1 N 0 I L/1r-1 '-1 -7LN- 00 O - ONMIND -7 � N I I I II 8 roM u1r- i1NO iCOa010u•1oON- 0 0N 0h00 N- N0 v1OmM .-•1 rnCON- COOQ -1u N ,- 1OOOOO I 4-1 ,-1 -''' 01 -4' ,700111 MCA CO I I " " " 1 " AA " I " " I I I I I W CV N u1 M 0 r-1 CO O r- M M v1 N O O- r-I 0 r- V0 r-4 M c u1 N VO NO C7 H M W Phi r-1 'O N M n r-{ CO y ^ � v ,-4 ONO M ,4 CA r♦ O Cm CO u1 . .- M u) a) coH HP 00 0 0•' 4.1 r-1 •r1 COMM .7 ‘40ON- r-I0001 0N- u1Nr-1 u1CO0 -10 -7n NO ^ CM -70 r-1 •0 u1 r- 0 I 0 1001c0 -7uf u•1 ,-I 10n1- O ^ CON- 00 CON 0 , 4 I r-ICr) u1MOl I CO .O I 0A 0 0 tOOmr� OO\ OMulu1VOHN 000ONN -. OA h, 01 Oco M00H r--I " Quin n et -7ON I M A JJ 0 Cf r-1 n 0 0l N ul r-4 I O N O n• - M M N M n M N M .(000r.', ,--10 O' (1) ) W CO X ,Iul rl r-1011-1 N- v.-AM .-1 ,1- Ln N O ,7 ri N M l0 r--I r-1 r--I O '.0 r-1 H ,--1 ' u1 m0,1 h r-1 CO 00 a) W 0 b iJ 1W 'b H OOOOOON- H mm OMOu1MO0ulO ' Hu1C0 00111 -fOONu1OOOO ' O I OOON I I I r- MkOQ� NN ' ON- OMO 1 0Or-1 -1' 1 1 1 1 1 08q N40NO ON %0ONOOr- 01- OOOd ON ,7r, ONHNr--1 ,700u•14OOr-1O00u1OOOOO 'b �7 �7MNN- 0N- -I M 1 COMI I i MN Mt. u1 " " " " " " " " 1 " " " 1 1 I I I 0 •n O 'H v0 ul N N r-4 n O\ n N �O N ul M N N 0 r1 O - CC W O H N .-I r 1 N M .1- M4-4 ,-1 0 N- %.0'.0 " M 00n N 'H r-1 r-4 CO • W M0 N O CM O1 u'1 N O CO n Q1 ri .7 M O ul N rH M 'H r'-I CO M ul N- O Cm N r1 n ,-1 n kr) M I -7 0, O c+1 Lt.) 01 I 0 ON M I n I u'1 0 M O N N -7 u'1 I N- I I r- O> I O I O 00 Or-1V0O\ ..? Ou1 �7Ok0u) OO r-1H .00 NOM 01ko � 010\ HOOOOrn .00uIO >a p 4.1 › M \O lf1 '.0 1 N O 0 r-1 r1 1 N 4 1 I. r1 N rI M r1 M I N ( 1 M r� 1 N Al 1/40 j U U r1 N M rl H N r-I O-o <4 Pr '1 ' N M Cm N f V cN En r'1 W CO zU 10 m a) a) r--1OOOOOOOOOr, u1 rnMOOOOOOnu•1vOV0Or--1ON 00 O Pet 0 O NOOOOOOO u1 O N I Om Ch ill OOOO ul OOu1 O0000 1 CDICDIIIIII CV 0 ChMOOu10MO000N 0h v0OmMMr-1000 r4 .70h � u100urrI0001O10OOOOO Q �7 �7ulMON- N r- O4O I- N- 1 " " "4 " " " " " " Oh000V0 1 ON 1 I I I I I 4`� co 1-4O r1 N r-1 r-1 N r-1 H M N M in O 0 !� M P1 04 O r4 4-4 r-1 0 u1 ,--1N N rl r1 .J. U1 N N O n CO r',u1 V0 4+ ' ' 4O N r-1 a) r-1 rI 1-1 N COCA n ..-I .7 v0 00 t, VD ^ 0r-1 '.O ONu14DOM I O 'H N '.O I -700OQ -4-40 COL101v0r.1 - N '. O .fu1 VD Om '.D I I I I I 0CD ,1- vO 0 .0o707N -0 1 M r-4 r-4 v) 4-4 wOOOOM wv0A0N ON uA00o0NOO �7 �0v0 .7000O ,.._' 4 N X70000 I 01 N N O M 1 'H Ch " I " " " " " " " " " " "v " " " ro `� ul M '.Ou CO 'H Mr- N N MQ1h.CN 0 ,7cr10hululN C) CMM111 1 0 l 'H H I I 1 I ! L� r'1 l0 r-I M C\ 'H r-1 N M ^ ' O1 Qm <0 M u1 O M H M r"'.4 M H ,-.1 ........-,, m A 4) cn U tJ b0 La) b q) > 0 0 • CJ 0 U) N E a) 0 0 0 4 to >+ G a0) GO C U cn > co v > u) a H U •00 a) > 4J 0 aJ 4J 0 CO co tJ U) w 4-4 SA o ra)n m TJ iJ F+ ,.0 0 f0 (!1 W co ca )+ aJ .J �' .iJ u JJ ) +-I r4 O r1 ,a a) a) 1J .0 F+ E iJ yJ - a) 3 0 ai a) 0 al a) a) •'U+ 0 ro a) U > g •H N = 0 O O U 0 0 a) H 0 0 1~ 'U • H E E a) E E E 4J r-1 iJ I., al a) > 1 N ; C v a) a) 4-1 a a) a) 4r1 a) aJ a) > 1) a) a) C0 a) C H E E E ro a4 E E Ern > iJ > > O > > > Q Q I- 0 I•, • W •rl +-) )4 H •fl m a) a) v 3 a) a v < aJ O O 4- 0 0 0 'b I.+ • $4 +J U a) a) 0. x •r1 a) a) •r1 > > > CO > > > iJ a) ?+ >~ a, >+ 4 l-+ it H 4J H 0 r-1 P; a) a) •O tJ >,U co O A GI W a+ H W P a) W u O a E a S a. a 0 N WP4 Cr -1 i4 U 4J •raM0. 0.> )-4040404 ,--IMI-4 ,4E Ems+ E E 4+ H v ? E Co I•+ � W I I,., )-, O •H • � x 6 00 3HHH r1A +•4 0 +J 'b E E E a) E E E w N o o G) g 0 ' X• �j ca ) •H _0 4 ro H H H I O H H H P1 1 U Q,r Qi N c>1 U Q,r a) )+ a) H H a) W O a) cd 04 0) ca I 'H a) 0 a) I P4-4 I. rl N N M .1 u1 '.O N. 1- N- O' O 44 O O '-4 Q) cb •-I � CO C) 44 C7 h w LL, Z O U 14 W O O 4 U 4 O P., v0 r- r- r- r- N- r- N- r- r- r- r. O 0 O co 0 O pa w O (al H a) b O ri ,--1 N M ul N- N M .7 ul 'H N ul v0 'H N -7 u1 '.0 n O M r.4 N M -7 ul v) r- O Qm 0 r-1 'H N M �7 ul O O r-1 r-I ' ri H N N N N 01 01 01 01 ,T ,7 ,7 ,7 ,7 ,I ul u1 ul ul u1 ul u1 u1 ul 'O N- CO CO CO CO 00 fliakupee Ctummunitg *mires Co 129 Levee Drive Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone 445-2742 Community Education • Parks • Recreation • Adult Education George F. Muenchow, Dir. 7/22/$1 John Anderson SUBJECT: _$ash End Park Building Progress Report Perhaps Jim Cook has filled you in already on the following. 1 . Evidently following some criss crossed conversations, rantings, ravings, and gentle persuasion the building was moved off site on to. somewhere on Hennepin Cty Hwy #1 last week. In light of this the Committee is moving post haste to get it erected at the school location as soon as possible. a. Weather permitting the site will be prepared with foundation this weekend. b. If possible with the mover, the building will be moved the first part of next week and secured. 2. The Committee has set up a procedure for handling the paper work to avoid mistakes, misunderstandings, errors etc. George Muenchow A COOPERATIVE EFFORT OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE AND SCHOOL DISTRICT 720 SINCE 1954 (-- o STATE OF MINNESOTA 7 7, z[�•+441IFGa DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE r \ �i. y""s- o 90 WEST PLATO BOULEVARD �1. AGO LAND OF QUALITY FOODS SAINT PAUL, MINN. 55107 (612) 296-8580 July 15, 1981 R,iC E* /VEZ) Mr. John Anderson sill' 2 Shakopee,129 EastFMNJt55379Ue ` 1 1981 Dear Mr. Anderson: crT yOF$�y AKGpEE On July 1 , 1981 , the Shade Tree Division of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture conducted a field inspection of your community's shade tree program. The purpose of the inspection was to check for compliance with applicable shade tree laws and regulations in accordance with the contract provisions of your grant-in-aid agreement with the State Department of Agriculture. Inspections include: 1 . Reviewal of control area designation. 2. Confirmation of sanitation surveys completed by June 15, July 15, and August 15 deadlines. 3. Confirmation of timely removal of trees and proper high/low risk designation. 4. Confirmation of proper elm/oak wood and tree disposal and utilization practices. 5. Observation of reforestation practices. A copy of the inspection report is enclosed for your review. Observations and recommendations have been made at the end of the report. Please respond to the recommendations within three weeks either in writing or by contacting your regional Plant Health Specialist at (612) 296-8580. Dwight Robinson is the Plant Health Specialist for your region who visited your community. If any further questions arise, please contact your Plant Health Specialist or me at the the above number. Sincerely, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE iji)StAcr-- R chard Haskett, Director Shade Tree Division RH:cs Enclosure r"\--7 ENJOY THE HIGH QUALITY AND INFINITE VARIETY OF MINNESOTA FOODS EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER SF-00006-02 / STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Office Memorandum TO • Richard Haskett, Director DATE: 7/9/81 Shade Tree Program FROM : Dwight Robinson, Plant Health Specialist, Int. PHONE: 296-8580 Shade Tree Program SUBJECT: Inspection Report on Sanitation and Reforestation Activity in the City of Shakopee on July 1 , 1981 . Contacts: Jim Karkanen, Program Manager Walt Ackerman, Tree Inspector. Findings: 1 . Dying elm at corner of 337 4th Ave. 2. 2 elms dying on Holmes St. boulevard between 3rd and 4th Ave. 3. Diseased elm on boulevard in front of 1st National Auto Bank Building - Holmes St. 4. Dead elms disintegrating on lot at 306 Second Ave. Observations : Forty two trees (19 on private property) have been marked so far and over 20 have been removed. Fifty-nine trees were removed last year. Policy changes through recent action by the City Council have delayed action on removal . There will be no private property reimbursement or 100% subsidy for senior citizens this year. Boulevard trees are paid totally by the city. The dead tree above is one of Shakopee's first real removal problems. It is on rental property owned by one of the town constables who has been stalling removal by claiming that the power company is to remove the tree. However, Karkanen said the secondary line to the house is not near enough to the tree to warrant power company involvement. A final notice and deadline are to be sent soon to this property owner. Jim Karkanen is somewhat dismayed and disappointed by this year's heavy outbreak of disease. Removals are progressing now. Comments/Recommendations: 1 . The city is empowered to remove the delinquent tree at 306 Second 40 Ave. and was urged to take action on it. 2. It looks as though Shakopee will incur heavy losses this year. 3. The program overall appears to remain well run and efficient. DR:ss association of metropolitan municipalities JULY, 1981 480 CEDAR ST., ST. PAUL, MN 55101 NO. 16 AMM ANNUAL MEETING - 1981 The Seventh Annual Meeting of how to better utilize existing the Association of Metropolitan facilities but more importantly how Municipalities was held on to place new facilities where they Thursday, May 28, 1981, at the are needed most. Mr. Weaver went Thunderbird Motel and Restaurant on to discuss the changing of in Bloomington. Nearly 100 local attitudes on both the council's and officials representing 35 cities the cities' part, the lessening of attended the annual businessmistrust, the strengthening of the meeting to elect new officers for the partnership, and the power of 1981-82 year and to honor those knowledge that many cities have who have served the organization gained through the planning this past year. 4440 t process Mr. Weaver said, "It seems Charles Weaver, Chairman of the tobvious that the second major Metropolitan Council, former benefit of the Act is the increased Metropolitan Council member, and cooperation throughout the former State Representative from Region—between communities, Anoka, addressed the delegates on among counties and communities "the Metropolitan Land Planning 1, and townships, and between all Act: What Have We Learned." a those and the council." Mr. Weaver Mr. Weaver traced the origin of CHARLES WEAVER concluded with, "In the entire this landmark piece of legislation United States, no other Metro- and its total cost among the various local governments. "We started out politan area has gone through this communities and council, a total of with four Metropolitan Systems, exercise, but to remain viable, about $7.5 million_9ut of 195 units sketched with some haziness on a everyone will have to. We may feel of government required to develop broad landscape,and were forced to like we're just getting started, and in plans, 132 have been submitted and learn fairly quickly how to fill in the many ways we are, and the road is 67 completed. Of the remaining 63, details; how to give each of the 188 often rocky. But just think of where it is expected that 57 will be cities and towns and seven counties we are compared with the rest of the submitted by the July 1, 1981 the detailed system plans relevant to country. The ability to stay within deadline with seven more in limbo. each unique situation. We have in our resources is a key factor in Mr. Weaver indicated that the this process, gained a much better maintaining a comp competitive council's population/growth es- insight into how the timing and economic position with respect to timates have been found to be high, improvements to the metropolitan other regions of the country.We will therefore, the five year growth systems region-wide must be be paying more and more attention cushion in the 1990 Urban Services accomplished." An example of what to maintaining that position, area line appears to be more like a has been learned includes asewage stability-credibility-predictability. 25 year cushion. Based on working plant expansion five years sooner As these achievements of the Land with some of the counties and cities, than originally anticipated due to Planning Act are realized, the the council sought and achieved the collective growth of four cities in competitive advantage they give this legislation to preserve agricultural one area, while in another area a Region will rebound to everyone's land on a long term basis. Mr. major interceptor can be delayed benefit and to everyone's credit." Weaver felt that the most important considerably due to much slower thing learned by the council was growth. In sum total, Mr. Weaver AMM ANNUAL MEETING how to work more effectively with feels that the council has learned (Continued on page 5) PAGE 1 AMM OFFICERS ELECTED FOR 1980- 1981 YEAR JIM KRAUTKREMER MARY ANDERSON her activities in the AMM,has served on the League of Minnesota Cities Public Safety Committee and Development Strategies Commit- . `° tee. She has also served on the Metropolitan Council Interstate Study Committee and Modest Cost Housing Committee. Mary is currently chairing the Metropolitan Council's Housing and Redevelop- ment Authority Advisory Committee -� fie. and serves on the Advisory Committee to the Transit Commission. She has served on the _ Golden Valley Planning Commis- sion and Board of Zoning Appeals prior to being elected to the Golden• Valley City Council in 1973.She was � re-elected to her second term in 1977. Her husband, Donald, is PRESIDENT VICE-PRESIDENT manager of the Golden Valley Office of Edina Realty.They have two sons, Jim Krautkremer, Brooklyn tion Criteria Committee, Mn/DOT Jim, 17, and John, 13. (410 s Mayor, was elected as Transportation Advisory Commit- President of the Association of tee, FAU Committee of TAB, Land Eight officials were elected to Metropolitan Municipalities for the Use and Environment Policy serve on the Board of Directors, 1981-1982 year at the Annual Committee of the LMC, and seven for two-year terms and one for Meeting held May 28, 1981. Chosen Transportation Policy Committee of a one-year term. They are: for Vice President was Golden the National League of Cities. Jim Two-Year Term Valley Council Member, Mary additionally acted as Past President Bea Blomquist—Eagan, Mayor Anderson. Also elected were eight and Board Member of NCR Upper Jack Irving—Crystal, Manager Board Directors. Midwest Computer Users, Past Dennis Schneider—Fridley,Council Jim Krautkremer, although a President (71, 72, 73) and present Jim Senden—New Brighton, Mayor native of Minnesota, spent the early Board Member of the International Bob Thistle—Coon Rapids, years of his life in Papillion, Federation of NCR Computer Users. Manager Nebraska where he graduated from He was elected to the AMM Board of Bill Wilson—St. Paul, Council the University of Nebraska at Directors in 1976 and currently Shelley Wright—St. Paul, Mayor's Omaha with a Bachelor Degree in serves as chairman of the AMM Assistant Education. He began his career with Transportation Policy Committee One-Year Term Mutual United of Omaha Insurance and was Vice President for the 1980- Jackie Slater Minneapolis, Company, and in 1964 went to work 1981 year. Alderman for the Sister Kenny Rehabilitation Mary Anderson was elected to the Foundation. Currently he is the Association of Metropolitan Current Board Members Director of the Management Municipalities Board of Directors in Current Board members serving the Information Center for Midland October of 1979 as a suburban remaining year of two-year terms Cooperatives, Inc. and has an representative from Hennepin are: impressive record of public service. County. She has served on the AMM Ron Backes—St. Louis Park, He served on the Brooklyn Park legislative study committee on Council Planning Commission from 1968 to Housing since its origination in 1975 Bill Barnhart—Minneapolis,Planner 1970, was elected to the Council in and has for the past four years been Jerry Dulgar—Anoka, Manager 1971, and elected Mayor of that committee's Chairperson. She Jan Haugen—Shorewood, Council Brooklyn Park in 1973. Jim is has helped guide that committee in Jim Lacina—Woodbury, currently serving his fourth term as very detailed and difficult studies Administrator Mayor. He has also been active on and deliberations, working con- Tom Spies—Bloomington, Council the Planning Advisory Committee of stantly with local officials to develop Brad Stanius—White Bear Lake, the Transportation Advisory Board legislative policies which have Mayor (TAB), Co-Chairman of the helped preserve local government Dick Asleson—Apple Valley, Interstate Study Committee,and is a control in areas of zoning and Administrator, AMM-Past member of the Interstate Substitu- housing standards.Mary,along with President PAGE 2 24. l 1 f ,F gyp. y6 41.tpt r i,,,, X. it 113 — 3 . ilt k. alipl . 1.1 ,. 11,4,-, !- .n'i`x,• lot- ,,1 z '1 F }rF 4„„„,„„,, , 4 s r w �, 4.41r, ; 4 Zrt 9 h f T !-,11,1t.,‘,.. ,,,. k , ,,,„.....,N,... , I, i ANNUAL II,_ MEETI„mkt,. s . _ \ NG IN ., . . ., * REVIEW t MAY 1981 \,.' ,,. 1 7- \,,,,,,,t, ril t, , ''', V:ots4 I` d i , t PAGE 4 BOARD DIRECTORS and served on their Executive AMM Board. He was the President the Volunteer Center, Board of cities and the suburbs were often on Directors in both Genesee County, -¢ the opposite side of the issue. I see Michigan, and Woodbury County, this rapidly changing. More and Iowa. He also served on the Board of ° more in areas such as revenue, Directors in poverty agencies in 3 �� housing, and relationships with both Flint,Michigan,and Sioux City, other levels of government the Iowa. Bob served on the i_i , ,:,,, s,• aconcerns of all communities are Metropolitan Alliance of Munici- , . '� similar. Associations such as AMM palities in Genesee County as the offer an ideal forum to discover representative of the City of Flint. In '„ _, areas of common concern and Iowa, he served on the Governor's develop a unified approach." Office Task Force Reviewing State efforts to assist municipalities. 0 / a -5 f Finally, besides serving on the AMM , t Board of Directors, Bob also serves on the Executive Committee for LOGIS. Bob is married and he and ° �' his wife, Judy, have three children: Bill Barnhart �� ', g Jenny, 9; Mark, 6; and Brian, 3. Bill Barnhart was elected to the AMM Board of Directors in � AMM STAFF September of 1980. Bill has been ,m active in AMM since 1978, serving on both the Housing Advisory l in Committee and the Metropolitan , Agencies Committee. He has been in the Grants and Program Coordination division of the City Coordinator's Office in Minneapolis since 1978. Primary Bob Thistle duties have involved federal legislative liaison activities, ; Bob Thistle was elected to the AMM Board of Directors in May of downtown planning (skyways, � � � �- ��s parking, etc.), comprehensive plan 1980. Bob has been actively working development and CDBG program with the League of Minnesota Cities, .µ° development. From 1974 through City Managers Association, LOGIS 1977 Bill was in the City Planning and the AMM Board since he arrived I Department as both a community in Minnesota in mid 1979. Bob was planner and a project review born and raised in Detroit, °, s planner. Prior to that he was a Michigan, and earned his a research fellow at the University of undergraduate degree from Wayne ' •..- ° I Minnesota. State University. He began his Rodd Cindy Bill is a Minnesota native,coming career in public service in the City of R from a farming community in Fenton, Michigan, where he was Rodd C�ndyjoinedthe AMM staff southern Minnesota. He obtained Administrative Assistant to the City June 15, 1981 as Secretary/Admin- both his Bachelor's Degree and Manager. Later he became Deputy istrative Assistant replacing Odelia Master's Degree from Mankato Director of Genesee County Model Conlon who left to pursue a career State University. His Master's Cities Program and later Director of within the Federal Government in Degree was in Urban Studies and that program. Bob joined the City Washington, D.C. Her latest included working for the City of Manager staff in Flint, Michigan, as employment was with the League of North Mankato for one year. After a Budget Director in 1972. In 1974, he Minnesota Cities with which she stint in the Army in 1970-71, he became Deputy City Manager for worked for over two years as a moved to Minneapolis. He and his budget administration for the City of Receptionist/Secretary. She has wife Carol live in south Minnea- Flint. In 1976, he moved to Sioux had experience at several places in polis. Bill enjoys downhill skiing in City as Deputy City Manager for working with the public and the winter, playing softball in the Community Development and in performing various secretarial summer and attending Macalester late 1978 became Acting City skills. football games in the fall. Manager of that community for six Cindy's duties include managing After serving on the Board of months. He was appointed City the office, arranging meetings, and Directors for almost a year, Bill Manager of Coon Rapids, assisting the Executive Director and offers this observation: "In the past Minnesota, in July of 1979. the Director of Legislative Affairs in the concerns of the central cities Bob has taken an active role in their work. She also provides AMM and those of surrounding those communities where he has staff assistance to the Metropolitan communities have often not been served. In Flint, GeneseeCounty,he MAMA ea Managers Association the same,or if they were,the central worked actively with the United Way (MAMA). PAGE 3 AMM ANNUAL MEETING (Continued from page 1) President Asleson Addresses Delegates President Richard Asleson made some brief remarks concerning the AMM activities and highlights during the past year. The it:;••411 +1 • Association has developed over the years a position of respect from the Metropolitan Council and when .x testifying on various changes in council policy on several occasions = w this past year has had all of its suggestions and recommendations included in the final council policy '" pNN document. Membership and population representation have -- remained high even with a loss of President Elect Krautkremer and Retiring President Asleson. two communities from the high of 66 a year ago. Once again, due to again due to the concentrated will continue to be successful as an careful monitoring of expenses, efforts of the AMM and LMC we did Association only if you continue to there will be no general dues maintain a position much better be actively involved. I am confident increase for this year. We will, than originally proposed. The AMM that you will give the new president however, be utilizing a new dues sponsored the fourth levy limit and the mayor of Brooklyn Park,Jim schedule based on 1980 population seminar which had a record- Krautkremer, the same support you which will cause an adjustment for breaking attendance of 135 officials gave to me throughout the year." cities whose population increased and co-sponsored the annual March Retiring Board Directors were since 1970. Early in 1980, a number legislative conference which congratulated by President Asleson of suburban mayors raised some attracted 535 officials, including 104 for their dedicated service to the concern relative to the power of the legislators. AMM and were presented with Metropolitan Council. It was President Asleson ended by certificates of appreciation. They determined by a special study commenting, "Finally, considering included David Hozza, former St. committee that within the existing the severe financial problems of the Paul City Council and AMM financial resource constraint of the state, the political battles between President; Stan Kehl, former AMM, no additional council the Governor and the Legislature, Minneapolis Legislative Liaison; monitoring could be done. and the economy in general, I feel Sally Howard, Minneapolis However, due to this effort,a bill was the Association's accomplishments Alderman, Judy Rowley, former sought by the AMM and passed by in the last year were significant. Moundsview Council Person; and the Legislature creating a legislative Under your new president, whom Steve Wellington, St. Paul Mayor's study commission to undertake a you will hear from shortly, there are office. President Asleson then comprehensive study of the Metro- obviously new challenges. The 1982 introduced President-elect James politan Council and its agencies. legislative session will likely present Krautkremer who gave a brief talk, Probably the most important continued difficulties to cities. The thanked President Asleson for his achievement of the AMM, staff and Association can only be successful outstanding service, and presented various member city officials, was when member city officials him with a plaque containing the the adoption by the Metropolitan participate and work together. We Athenian Oath. Council and permissive legislation enacted by the legislature to AMM STORY — SLIDE PRESENTATION establish Comprehensive Plan Amendment Guidelines. The final A new version of"The Association council meeting or other civic affair product was a result of months of of Metropolitan Municipalities—An or knows of a non-member city that successful negotiating, producing a Investment in the Future"should be might be interested, please notify very workable set of rules and complete by early July. This tape the AMM office (222-2861). procedures that will be timely. and slide presentation depicts the Representatives from the Board Through joint efforts of the AMM accomplishments and goals of the and staff will appear before your and LMC, severe restrictions on use Association and will include council to show the 15-minute of IDR bonds and Tax Increment information on Financing were defeated. In the area policy status program and be available to outline through the 1981 legislativesession. current activities and policies, as of taxes, due to the State's severe If any member community would well as respond to questions. economic crisis, the cities did notlike this presentation made at a local gain as we have in the past, but PAGE 5 Employee AMM Residency Levy Limit— Board of PROHIBITED General Revenue Directors (opinion) Seminar Meets Monthly Legislation passed in 1981 prohibits any city in the Metropoli- The AMM will present the fourth The Association of Metro- tan area from requiring an employee annual Levy Limit Seminar, politan Municipalities' Board to be a resident of that city. It was in Thursday, July 30, 1981, at the St. of Directors meets on the first fact a very simplistic piece of legisla- Paul Civic Center. It will be held Thursday of every month tion and spoke only to residency. from 12:30 P.M. to approximately (except when a holiday comes Although other types of require- 4:00 P.M. in the 3M an Hoerner on or near that date). Meetings ments may in fact be tested in court Waldorf Rooms (C15-C16).As in the start at 7:30 P.M. and are held at some point in time, it is the past, there will be a nominal charge in the conference room at the opinion of AMM staff that only in the range of $5.00 per person to Association office, 300 residency is prohibited. It was also cover room, pop, coffee, and Hanover Bldg., 480 Cedar St., clear from the presentations by the materials. The presentation will be St. Paul. authors and others testifying at the similar to past years and will include All city officials are wel- legislature, that only residency as a an update of changes to .various come to attend the Board condition of employment was in laws affecting municipal revenues meetings, express their views question. Therefore,it is our opinion and property taxes made by the on any subject and bring any that a city may establish or continue 1981 legislature. The major seminar subject to the attention of the to provide a preference in hiring for topics will be Levy Limits,state aids, Board. residents, as long as the preference and property taxes. Due to security regulations, doesn't, practically speaking, The purpose of the seminar is to the building front door must be amount to a residency requirement. gain a better overall understanding locked at 8:00 P.M. Anyone It is also our opinion that for certain of the various laws affecting muni- arriving after that time, please job classifications a city may impose cipal revenues and budgets and find a phone (nearest is Capp a time or distance requirement from how these interact. Council persons Towers) and call t h e the place of employment to the and staff are encouraged to attend, Association office for admit- employee's home as a requirement. especially newly elected or tance (222-2861). Of course, as in any condition of appointed persons. Detailed For further information or to employment, the city must be in a information and registration have a subject placed on the position to show that the material will be sent to all cities in Agenda, please call the requirement is job related and the near future. Association office at 222-2861. justified. AMM Policy Committees BeingReappointed For Fall Meetings The AMM Policy Committees will range of issues that concern cities. established from time to time for be reappointed for two-year terms Based on requests from member specific topics. by the Board of Directors sometime cities or officials, the policy Persons currently serving on the this summer to begin development committees will develop appropri- committees will be contacted soon of new policy or changes to current ate legislative policy which is then to determine if theywish to continue policy for the 1982 legislative recommended to the Board of to serve. Any member from any city session. Committee hearings will Directors and passed on to the full may and is encouraged to volunteer start in late August or early membership for discussion and final to serve on a committee. If you are September. action. The five committees are now not part of a committee but The Association has five General Legislation, Metropolitan would like to become a member of continuing policy committees made Agencies, Municipal Revenue and any committee, contact a Board up of local officials, both elected Expenditures, Housing, and Trans- Director or AMM staff at 222-2861. and appointed, that study a full portation. Other committees are PAGE 6 BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECEIVED President Richard Asleson JUL 2 7198] Apple Valley association of Vice President metropolitan CITY James Krautkremer municipalities OF SHAKOPEE Brooklyn Park Past President July 21, 1981 David Hozza St. Paul Mary Anderson TO: Chief Administrative Officials Golden Valley AMM Member Cities Ronald Backes St. Louis Park Please be advised that there is a vacancy on the AMM William Barnhart Board of Directors due to the resignation from the Board Minneapolis of Brad Stanius, White Bear Lake Mayor. In accordance Bea Blomquist with the AMM By-Laws, the Board will select a replacement Eagan to fill the remaining portion of Mayor Stanius' term at Jerry Dulgar the next Board meeting. The Board is soliciting recom- Anoka mendations from AMM member city officials via this letter. Jan Haugen The Board, in selecting the new director, will make every Shorewood effort to maintain the area, population and demographic Sally Howard balance that exists on the current Board. Recommendations Minneapolis should be received in the AMM office in writing by no later than August 5, 1981. The recommendations which were Jack Irving received by the Nominating Committee prior to the Annual Crystal Meeting in May are still on file and will be considered by James Lacina the Board in addition to any recommendations received as a Woodbury result of this letter. Judy Rowley Mounds View NOTE : It would be appreciated if you would bring this Dennis Schneider matter to the attention of your Mayor and City Council Fridley Members. Thank you. Thomas Spies Sincerely, Bloomington Brad Stanius White Bear Lake S;� .� ?y' Vern Peterson Robert Thistle Executive Director Coon Rapids Stephen Wellington VP/cr St. Paul Executive Director Vern Peterson 300 hanover bldg.480 cedar street,st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 222-2861 // ' MINUTES OF THE SHAKOPEE POLICE COMMISSION J U L 1 7 1ga1 Ipte sHoo Minutes of the meeting of July 8, 1981 �'i Members present: Chairperson Virgil Mears, Commissioner Dan Steil Members absent: Commissioner Stan Dircks 1. Meeting called to order at 4:00 P.M. and the minutes of the previous meeting were approved. 2. Police Chief, Tom Brownell, informed the Commission as to his proposals for the budget requirements for the 1982 budget period and stated that he is working closely with 1981 budget figures. 3. The Commission talked in length about the Crime Prevention Fund of which Police Chief, Tom Brownell, has forwarded information on other Minnesota Communities Crime Prevention Fund systems. The suggestion was made that each member of the Commission thoroughly study the material and the system and that the next police commission meeting be a working session to discuss the Crime Prevention Fund among commission members. 4. A motion to adjourn was made at 4:55 P.M. Daniel G. Steil July 14, 1981 / r SHAKOPEE EASTSIDE PARK STEERING COMMITTEE We met July 14, 1981 at the home of Chuck Rieck at 1052 Miller Street The following were present: Jane Carlson, Phillis Martinson, Bob Langer, Jim Cook, Jim Kephart, Jim Moriarty, Chuck Rieck As a group we inspected the grading done of the skating rink site at the Junior High School. Jim Cook reported that the City of Shakopee has agreed to pay for the cost of the playground equipment and the shelter/warming house. The City has also agreed to fund the hockey rink for 1982. The playground equipment was ordered by qeorge Muenchow on June 26 with no definate time of arrival. Jim Cook notified us that the City of Shakopee has agreed to cover the cost of lighting the general skating area. Jim Cook told us that the cost of the shelter/warming house was $2,000. - the cost to move the structure $2,700. e and the cost of putting in a floor for the shelter/warming house $1,050. - with neighbourhood labour donating their time. There followed a general discussion where it was decided the shelter/warming house would have to be partitioned to provide storage for the Junior High as well as the warming area for skating. Jim Kephart agreed to draw up these plans for us . There followed a general discussion of what would need to be done to the shelter/warming house once it is here in Shakopee and it was agreed we would need blocks , foundation, shingles , door, insulation, heaters and a wood seal. Jim Kephart offered to supervise the lying of the block for the shelter/warming house once on the site . Phillis Martinson's group will organise the shelter/warming house once on location. Jim Cook should know within two week when the warming house will be moved. It was decided we would like the concrete blocks on the structure and Jim Cook will call the owner concerning this . Jim Kephart offered to get an estimate of the cost of sealer for the outside of the building and also an estimate on a floor for the structure. Phillis Martinson offered to get an estimate of the cost of a cupulo for the shelter/warming house . Chuck Rieck was asked to call his committee to set up the exact spots for the erection of the playground equipment. The committee expressed it' s appreciation of the council 's efforts . The next meeting will be held July 21 at 7 p.m. at theYpme of Jim Kephart at 10(4 Ramsey Street. Respectfully submitted Gwen Ellingson. /3 PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS ANP APPEALS REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, LI NNESOTA JULY 9, 1981 Chrm. Schmitt called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.N. with Comm. Coller, Stoltzman, Perusich and Vierling present. Comm. Koehnen arrived at 7:40; Comm. Rockne was absent. Also present were Don Steger, City Planner; John Leroux, Council Liaison and John K. Anderson, City Admr. Perusich/Vierling moved to approve the minutes of June 11, 1981 as kept. ik:otion carried with Coller abstaining. PUBLIC HEARING - Link Variance Reg uest (PC 81-16V) Coller/Vierling moved to open the public hearing on the applications for three vari- ances for the construction of a 12-unit condominium project at Co. Rd. 17 and 10th Avenue. Motion carried unanimously. The City Planner explained that the applicant is Cletus Link, who is requesting ap- proval of a 5 foot frontyard setback variance off of 10th Ave. , an 8 foot frontyard setback variance off of Co. Rd. 17 and a 12 foot rearyaid setback variance from the north property line, in order to construct three 4-plex buildings containing a total of 12 condominium units. Chrm. Schmitt asked for comments from the audience. Carl Gantriis, 937 Sibley Street, Shakopee, stated he is concerned with putting the building so close to the intersection because of the safety factor which would be caused by the line-of-sight at this heavy intersection. Chrm. Schmitt explained that the proposed builcing would be farther back from the street than the existing buildings in the area. Jerome Colling, 952 Sibley Street, asked when that block was zoned R4. Chrm. Schmitt answered that it has been zoned that way for at least 8-10 years. Mr. Colling was concerned about how close the proposed buildings would be .to his property. Discussion ensued regarding whether or not there was a utility easement on the property. Fran Vohnoutka stated that his home is on 10th Avenue, and he has an 8 foot utility easement on his property, so thought there should be a 16 foot easement. Kermit Lindmeyer stated that he was the owner of the property before Clete Link, and stated it was platted as an outlot of Scenic Heights 1st Add'n, and there is no ease- ment. Fred Engfer, 960 Sibley, asked for a definition of R4 zoning. Chrm. Schmitt stated that dwellings of more than 2 families per structure. The City Planner stated that minimum square footage was determined by the number and size of bedrooms. Tfr. Engfer was concerned with the number of people in that small area. The City Planner stated the square footage of the property is sufficient for 12 units, It is because the shape is so irregular that the variances are needed; it makes it difficult to lay out the units. Sandra Gantriis, 937 Sibley, stated she is concerned about the entrances an: exits to the units, as this is a very busy intersection with many children walking. Chrm. Schmitt answered that the driveways are more than 100 feet from the intersection. board of Adjustments and AppLais July 9, 1981 t Page 2 Comm. Coller stated that with this R4 zoning, the property could contain this density in a highrise or other less desirable building. He stated that as far as utilization of this property, , he thought this proposal was well planned. Chrm. Schmitt added that what is being planned for the property is private ownership, rather than non-resident ownership of rental property. Comm. Koehnen inquired whether any conditions or stipulations were put on the outlot at the time of platting. Kermit Lindmeyer answered there were none. Fred Engfer asked who was responsible for the condominium upkeep. Clete Link answered there will be a Homeowners Assoc. Fran Vohnoutka asked about the design of the buildings, and Clete Link answered they would be two-story condominiums. Chrm. Schmitt asked for any other comments from the audience, and there were none. Coller/Perusich moved to close the public hearing. notion carried unanimously. Coller/Stoltzman offered Variance Resolution No. 279, granting a 5 foot variance from the frontyard setback requirement off of 10th Avenue, an 8 foot variance from the frontyard setback requirement off of Co. Rd. 17, and a 12 foot variance from the rear yard setback requirement off the north property line in order to construct three 4- plexes and associated detached garages, northeast of the intersection of 10th Avenue and Co. Rd. 17, and moved its adoption, contingent upon a satisfactory easement arrange- ment being worked out with the SPUC and City Engineer. Fran Vohnoutka asked about the law on easements, if he can us% the easement for access to his own property. Chrm. Schmitt stated the easement is for the exclusive use of the utilities or drainage activities. Motion carried with Comm. Koehnen abstaining because she did not have full participa- tion in the discussion. Chrm. Schmitt informed the audience that there is a 7 day appeal period, during which time anyone can file an appeal and have the issues heard by the City Council. REVIEW - elinnesota Renaissance Festival Variance Request The City Planner stated this request is for a variance from the sign regulations to erect a temporary Port-A-Panel sign during the months of August and September. This sign would be the same size and at the same location as in the past. Coller/Vierling offered Variance Resolution No. 257 for a variance from the sign regu- lations for Minnesota Renaissance Festival to erect a Port-A-Panel sign in August and September, and moved its adoption. The Commissioners gave their consensus that this could remain a review item as long as the conditions do not change. J;otion carried with Coller abstaining. Coller/Vierling moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8:10 P.M. John Schmitt Chairman Diane S. Beuch, Recording Secretary /1y AD HOC CABLE COMMUNICATION COMMITTEE Shakopee , Minnesota Adjourned Regular Session July 15 , 1981 Chairman Foudray called the meeting to order at 7 :05 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall with Committee Members present : Abeln, Christensen, Davis and Kirchmeier. Committee Member Gorman was absent . Also present were John Anderson, City Administrator, and Jeanne Andre , Administrative Assistant . Davis/Abeln moved to approve the July 1 , 1981 minutesas presented. Motion carried. The Committee decided to accept Attorney Herbst's recommendation to review the video tape dealing with access programs produced in Fridley. Abeln/Davis moved to meet next Wednesday, July 22 , to view the video tape at the Pearson School at 7 :00 p.m. Motion carried . Jeanne Andre informed the Committee of a Public Access workshop on September 11 and 12 , recommended by Anita Benda. The Committee asked the City Staff to get more information on the Workshop and report same to the Committee . Christensen/Davis moved to have city staff draft a letter to Senator Packwood rega'-ding his Amendment to Senate Bill 898 establishing limitations on Municipal authority related to Cable Communications. The letter should ask Congress to solicit public comment on such legislation prior to passage (Copies of the letter will be sent to Minnesota Senators . ) Motion carried. Discussion was opened with Attorney Adrian Herbst regarding his memo dated July 15 , 1981 with suggested corrections related to the Pre- liminary Cable Communications Franchise Ordinance . Davis/Christensen moved to discuss and take under consideration the corrections and suggestions provided by Attorney Herbst item by item. Motion carried . Christensen/Kirchmeier moved to adopt correction No. 1 of Attorney Herbst ' s Memo relating to Section 1 .01 of the Ordinance , clarifying the establishment of the Ad Hoc Committee . Motion carried. Christensen/Davis moved to adopt correction No . 2 regarding Section 1 .03 of the Ordinance , explaining the uses of the cable franchise processing fee . Kirchmeier/Davis moved to adopt correction No . 3 relating to Section 3 .04 of the Ordinance , clarifying the definition of "City" . / 5/ AD HOC CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE PAGE 2 JULY 15 , 1981 Abeln/Kirchmeier moved to adopt correction No. 4 relating to Section 5 of the Ordinance , providing for City Council approval of System design , -clarifying the initialchannel capacity and adding the pub- lic library as a designated facility to be provided a return line . Motion carried . Attorney Herbst related that he deleted 5 .03 from the initial draft of the Ordinance and renumbered the following subsections of Section 5 . Chairman Foudray asked if anyone in the audience would like to be heard. Norbert Theis , Chairman of the Jackson Township Board, asked about the cost and availability of getting service in the Peavey, Davies , and Glenn Ellen subdivisions in Jackson Township. Discussion was held on the alternative procedures which could be followed to bring Jackson Township into the Cable Service Territory (CST) . Christensen/Davis moved to adopt the corrections and additions of No. 5 relating to Sections 5 . 10 and 5 . 11 of the Ordinance providing for incorporation of the grantee ' s plan for testing the system into the ordinance and requiring audio and video emergency override . Motion carried. Davis/Kirchmeier moved to adopt correction No. 6 relating to Section 6 .02 of the Ordinance requiring all access channels to be provided on all proposed tiers of service. Motion carried. Abeln/Davis moved to adopt correction No . 7 relating to Section 7 .03 the Ordinance clarifying required components of the construction time- table . Motion carried. Kirchmeier/Davis moved to adopt correction No . 8 relating to Section 7 .03 of the Ordinance requiring underground installation when all other utilities are underground . Motion carried. Davis/Kirchmeier moved to adopt correction No . 9 relating to Section 8. 11D allowing the City Council to shorten rate review procedures if so desired. Motion carried. Davis/Kirchmeier moved to adopt correction No . 10 relating to Section 8. 11E with the following added "for first two (2) years" providing for no rate increases until two years from completion of construction of the ipitial service territory. Motion carried. Davis moved to adopt correction No. 11 relating to Section 8. 11F(5) of the Ordinance . Motion died for lack of a second . Kirchmeier/Abeln moved to add Paragraph H to Section 8. 12 of the Ordinance as Attorney Herbst suggested in correction 12 of his Memo, providing for System upgrade initiated by the City. Motion carried. AD HOC CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE1 PAGE 3 JULY 15 , 1981 Abeln/Kirchmeier moved to adopt correction No. 13 relating to Section 9.06 of the Ordinance establishing construction bond at 125% of the construction cost. Motion carried. Abeln/Christensen moved to adopt correction No. 14 regarding Section 9.01E of the Ordinance providing for franchise fees to be used only for cable-related services provided by the City. Motion carried. Kirchmeier/Davis moved to reconsider correction No. 11 as recommended by Attorney Herbst for 8 . 11 (Paragraph 5 and 6) allowing the City 4 months to make a determination related to rate changes . Motion carried. Chairman Foudray called for a 5 minute recess at 8 : 25 p.m. Chairman Foudray called the meeting back to order at 8 : 35 p.m. Christensen/Abeln moved to add whatever language Attorney Herbst thinks best to be put into the Ordinance relating to Section 5 .07 . (How costs of interconnection to other systems shall be determined or apportioned. ) Motion carried. Kirchmeier/Davis moved to delete Section 8.08B of the Ordinance re- garding Service Contracts suggesting the possibility of special rates for senior citizens , etc. Motion carried. Davis/Kirchmeier moved to have 8.08F amended as Consultant Benda and Attorney Herbst may think most desirable to allow contracts longer than 12 months in line extension areas . Motion carried. Abeln/Davis moved to have Attorney Herbst redraft Section 8. 10-8. 12 of the Ordinance to provide for possible decrease in rates . Motion carried. Christensen/Abeln moved to include Section 9 .01D on the ordinance providing for advance payment of the franchise fee , and to have Con- sultant Benda establish a reasonable dollar amount for the advance payment based on projected system revenues and expenses . Motion carried. Chairman Foudray left the meeting at 9 : 10 p.m. Abeln/Davis moved to adopt $10,000 as the required Security fund in Section 9 .02A of the Ordinance . Motion carried. Abeln/Davis moved to instruct Attorney Herbst to consult with Con- sultant Benda to draft a provision shortening the franchise term as a penalty for late construction and establishing some reward for completion of construction ahead of schedule . Motion carried . Davis/Kirchmeier moved to accept late penalty fees as recommended, for Section 9 .03 , at $100 for A, $25 for B , C, D, and E and $100 for F and G. Motion carried . AD HOC CABLE COMMUNICATION COMMITTEE PAGE 4 JULY 15 , 1981 Kirchmeier/Abeln moved to adopt recommendation of Consultant Benda for a 6 month period instead of 18 month period allowed for delay in construction of system prior to possible revocation of franchise in Section 10.01D of the Ordinance . Motion carried. Abeln/Davis moved to have Attorney Herbst review Section 12 of the Ordinance on the City ' s right to purchase the system and draft re- visions for the Committee ' s consideration. Motion carried. Kirchmeier/Davis moved to provide for amendments to the franchise by a two-thirds vote of the City Council in Section 14.04. Motion carried . Abeln/Kirchmeier moved to leave Section 15 .03 outlining where copies of the system offering will be kept , as drafted except change City Administrator to City Clerk. Motion carried. Abeln/Davis moved to have an additional Section drafted by Attorney Herbst to provide for a non-profit community access corporation with board of directors to be elected by the membership. Motion carried.. The Committee discussed the Initial Service Territory and Line Ex- tension Policy. Administrative Assistant Jeanne Andre explained that she had used an incorrect scale on the map provided to Anita Benda and CTIC for the previous Committee discussion of the initial service area and that correct information could significantly change the previous projections . Revised information has been provided to Ms . Benda, but she was unable to provide further cost analysis as of meeting time . The Committee discussed the issue and whether the previous actions of the Committee designating an initial service area should be revised. It was determined that because the Committee is closely divided on this issue , both sides would be presented to the City Council with the revised projections to be prepared by Ms . Benda . The final determination would therefore be left to the City Council . Kirchmeier/Abeln moved to adopt the memo under date of July 14, 1981 from Consultant Anita Benda clarifying language of RFP to reflect previous Committee decisions . Motion carried. Davis/Kirchmeier moved to adjourn to July 22 , 1981 at City Hall and view the video tape and have an adjourned regular meeting. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 10: 30 p.m. R. Gene Foudray Chairman Mary Arlt Recording Secretary /5 MEMO TO: All City Employees FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administratolk RE: Vacation Policy DATE : July 29 , 1981 Introduction At its July 21 , 1981 meeting, City Council "changed the practice" of allowing vacation to be taken before it was earned. I say practice because there was no formal policy allowing the taking of vacation before it was earned. Council ' s action, which was effective immediately, created a problem because several employees had vacations planned which required that they take some of their annual vacation this year before it was earned. Action July 28, 1981 At its July 28, 1981 meeting, City Council moved the date for implementing this change in vacation policy to January 1 , 1982 so employees could take vacations that were already planned and could only be taken by using unearned vacation. City Council took this action because they understood the problem caused by immediate implementation. What the Policy Means There is apparently a good deal of misunderstanding about why this change was made and the impact it will have on employee vacations . 1 . The "practice" of allowing advanced use of vacation was not creating a problem. It was not, however, legally permissable and never was written policy. 2 . In "cleaning-up" several miscellaneous changes to the personnel manual the Finance Director and I decided it was time to make the "practice" legal policy. 3 . The primary reasons Council gave for not allowing the practice to be made legal policy were that they (Council) didn ' t believe in paying for benefits that hadn ' t been earned; and that none of them had seen the practice used in the private sector. 4. Council is not, nor is management, telling you when you can take your vacations . All that is required is that an employee set aside a period of time to accumulate sufficient vacation days to take vacation in large blocks as you have done in the past . If you have questions about this policy that aren' t covered above or that your department head can ' t fully explain please call me . JKA/jam (....) N) Hx C CA 0'4 . : HI -P-- CO H-1 CN (Th ..,j 0 •• P• •• 0 OO n 0 n) 0 • 6 1--10 ' '71 ti ,-t1 CA 0 77 rt < • ... _ N) 1—•• H4 LP CO I--, -P" •• 0 P• •• 0 1-." •• o r• •• H. 7d La rt (...,.) G It c.,...) G rt La rt > 0 < 0 G `•C n (0 n -...i Cl) '-'d H• '-'d H. hi H• `73 n •• Li O0 A> o = n i-J H. X N) cT . D Ln -F--• frd t....) .P'• C frd LI! Cm) •• 0 •• 0 •• rt- G G o n 0 1-- - L.) H. (7 cn C o . 0 I--' 1-- M rt . , 0 H. H. ti t-Z1 frd (1) frd rt- 0 no 0 . Co r.P F---' 1-‹ . . . N.) N) .....j 0 4.) Cr., • C) t) > --.1 n t-ci o 0 a. •• 0 1--' I-3 La ta) . • Z = 0 n Z ri- 0 H. n ---...1 0 0 P•fj cn H. , •• £ X cn = . , Z > X N) N.) 00 1--, -P'• ......j . Ir I-1 P>- )-44 . .. . . . ND N.) i---, N.) l_n . . Ca • . r•.4. . .,. A . , ei D PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JULY 9, 1981 Chrm. Schmitt called the meeting to order at 8:12 P.M. with Comm. Coller, Stoltzman, Perusich, Vierling and Koehnen present. Comm. Rockne was absent. Also present were Don Steger, City Planner; John Leroux, Council Liaison; H. R. Spurrier, City Engi- neer and John K. Anderson, City Admr. Vierling/Perusich moved to approve the minutes of June 11, 1981 as kept. Motion carried with Coller abstaining. PUBLIC HEARING - Family Dining, Inc. request to re-zone (PC 81-20R) Perusich/Coller moved to open the public hearing on the request to rezone a 2.63 acre parcel from I-2 to B-1. Motion carried unanimously. The City Planner stated that the applicant is Family Dining, Inc. d/b/a 1 & 44 Liquor Center. The applicant would like to relocate the 1 & 44 center from its present lo- cation to the 2.63 acres being requested for rezoning from the I-2 Heavy Industrial Zone to the B-1 Highway Business Zone, immediately east of Landey's Camping Center. At a previous meeting the Planning Commission had stated it does not like spot zoning, and therefore suggested the applicant approach other landowners in the area to find out if any of them were receptive to rezoning to Highway Business. Don Woodward stated that he is an Industrial Real Estate Broker representing the 1 & 44- Liquor Center. He enumerated various reasons why his client wishes to relocate the business at this location. He pointed out that this area was Highway Business Zone before the new Zoning Ordinance had been adopted in October of 1979• Mr. Woodward stated he had talked to all of the property owners along that stretch of highway, ani he indicated on a map those who were willing to be rezoned Highway Busi- ness. These included Gearman, Howe Industries, Cretex, Tobco Land Holding and Landey's. The management of J.I. Case is based in Wisconsin and they indicated no oppostion to the proposal, but they were concerned with being in the middle of building and wanted to check out any potential problems with rezoning. Darwin Hentz, owner of Raceway Park, stated he would have no problem with having Race- way Park rezoned, but he also owned 20 acres there and thought he would have a better market for that land if it remained Industrial zoning. William Pearson 's property consists of basically a 65 foot hole, and thought his market would be better with Industrial Zoning. Mr. Woodward stated his client has a good reputation, the City has had no problem with the current liquor store and they plan to put up an attractive building which they feel would be an asset. Comm. Vierling asked about tax ramifications for the property owners if the zoning was changed. The City Planner answered that the City Assessor said such a rezoning of the existing businesses should not diminish their values nor reduce the tax base. In fact, the City Assessor commented that property values might actually be enhanced. Comm. Coller asked about the balance of land use between industrial and business regarding newago Now, and tion Ci Ly I'lantwr r<r,Tondnd that it would not af'f'ect it because they are existing businesses. July 9, 1981 Page 2 / Chrm. Schmitt asked for comments from the audience. Eldon Reinke asked what was the reasoning of the Planning Commission when they re- zoned it to Industrial from Highway Business. Comm. Coller stated he thought that the narrow strip of business may have been overlooked in the larger industrial area. He checked back in his notes and couldn't find any notation regarding this rezoning. Vierling/Koehnen moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Coller/Perusich moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning of this 2.63 acre parcel from I-2 to B-1, contingent upon rezoning next month the parcels of property identified as Lots 1-3, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 3, Cretex Industrial Park 1st Addition - Lot 1, Block 1, Howe 1st Addition - Lot 1, Blk. 1, Case 1st Addn. - Tobco, Inc. , a 5.17 acre parcel in Sec. 2-115-22 - Landy's Camping Cent. , a 5.8 acre parcel in Sec. 3-115-22 and a 6.2 acre parcel in Sec. 3-115-22 fee Owner: Darwin Hentz under CD Rosemarie Gearman. Motion carried unanimously. The rezoning of the adjacent property is to be initiated by the Planning Commission. The developer was advised that he can start construction after Council approval of the rezoning, if aware that the approval is contingent upon the rezoning of the adjacent properties. Coller/Vierling moved that the properties previously identified be submitted for rezoning at the August 13, 1981 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING - Scott Co. Lumber Co. , Inc CUP an: Mineral Extraction and Land Rehab- ilitation Permit (Mining Permit) (PC 81-18C) Perusich/Vierling moved to open the public hearing on the conditional use and mining permit to operate a sane and gravel mining operation southwest of CR 83 and CR 16. Motion carried unanimously. The City Planner stated that the applicant is Scott Co. Lumber Co. , Inc. , which is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit and a Mineral Extraction and Land Re- habilitation Permit (Mining Permit), to operate a sand and gravel mining operation off of CR83, just south of CR16. The applicant's consulting engineer, Howard Rosenwinkel, submitted an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) which includes a traffic impact analysis and a hydrological analysis, The City Planner highlighted 17 concerns addressed in the case report and concluded that staff recommended issuance of a Conditional Use Permit and Mining Permit granting approval for mineral extraction and Iarid rehabilitation in a AG Zone, subject to the following conditions: 1. Conditional Use Peimit and Mining Permit be renewed on an annual basis. 2. The disturbed portion of the site be fully enclosed with a cyclone-type security fence of sufficient height to prevent intrusion. 3. The road restrictions and road maintenance measures as required by the County En- gineer be implemented. 4, Berms be placed around the entire perimeter of the mining area. The berms be fully seeded to prevent erosion, and be 10 feet in height. Shakopee Planning Commission /g (July 9, 1981 Page 3 5. A dense vegetative screening along the outside of the berm be planted. This screening plan shall be approved by the City Planner. 6. The mining operation maintain the following minimum setbacks: 100 feet from any residential or commercial property line; 500 feet from any residential or commer- cial structure; 30 feet from any road right-of-way. 7. All buildings and structures placed on the property obtain a Building Permit prior to construction. The buildings and structures shall be fully enclosed with the property's security fencing. 8. The hours of operations shall not extend beyond 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. 9. A dust control plan for GR83, south of GR16, shall be approved by the City Engineer. 10. Noise emissions shall not exceed the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency standards. 11. A plan preventing surface drainage and any on-site fuels, liquids, etc. from en- tering the extraction area be prepared and submitted to the City Engineer for approval. 12. No truck traffic from the mining operation be routed through the urban portion of the City of Shakopee. 13. Any lighting of the mining site be directed away from nearby residences. 14. The Northern Natural Gas Co. pipeline be relocated to the perimeter of the mining site, according to the arrangement established in Minnegasco's letter to Mr. Howard Rosenwinkel dated May 27, 1981. 15. A land reclamation plan be approved by the City of Shakopee. For simplification and ease of implementation for the City, a "phased" reclamation plan may be pre- ferable. 16. The applicant reimburse the City Engineering Lepartment for the department's review time of this proposal. 17. Conditional Use Permit approval be contingent upon City Council approval of the Mineral Extraction and Land Reclamation Permit (Mining Permit). The City Planner added that a surcharge was contemplated by the Planning Commission on each increment of mined material, but they have been informed by the City Attorney that the City does not have the authority to require a surcharge, but it could require a bond for reclamation procedures. Chrm. Schmitt asked the applicant if he wished to make a presentation at this time, and he declined, stating he would answer concerns as voiced. At this time Chrm. Schmitt asked the audience for comments. Mr. Robert Simons stated that he is an attorney representing Mr. and Mrs. Rutt and he was informed that at the June meeting of the Planning Commission, in which the public hearing on this Conditional Use Permit had been cancelled, Mr. Rosenwinkel Shakopee Planning i ssion / July 9, 1981 Page 4 was allowed to make a presentation of the requested operation, and he asked that same presentation be made now. At this time Mr. Rosenwinkel went through a pictoral presentation similar to what was done at the June meeting, showing lay-out of proposed operation, topography, water flow and easement for Rutt property. He stated at first it was thought the reclama- tion use might be for a sanitary landfill, but that has been changed to demolition landfill. It was also possible to put an industrial building in the hole. He stated that 99°0 of the traffic is anticipated to go to Hwy. 101, with very little using CR16. They are concerned with furnishing highway and construction industries with a source of material. They do not propose to process material, just dig and remove it. There would possibly be some periodic crushing, but no processing plants. Chrm. Schmitt opened the meeting to the audience questions. Roberta Schneider, 3300 Valley View Road, stated that she is President of the Shakopee Environmental Protection Assoc. , and she submitted petitions in opposition to the Con- ditional Use Permit and Mining Permit containing 175 signatures, signed by residents in the immediate area and other citizens of Shakopee. She compared 130 acres in a downtown area to demonstrate the size of the lane proposed for this operation. She stated they are concerned about the mining operation itself, and now again concerned with the remark about possibly putting an industrial building in the hole for recla- mation. John Paron, Route 1, Box 47, owns 10 acres to the south and east of the proposed site on CR83, the former Del Anderson farm. He stated he is vehemently opposed to the granting of the permits. He thinks it would devaluate the surrounding farms and pro- perty. He quoted from "Real Estate Practice" relative to the damage done by a mining operation to the water level, pollution, noise, dust, smoke, etc. , concluding that the damages to the property would not be curable. Howard Rosenwinkel responded that for 25 years he has been involved with mining opera- tions, sand and gravel and quarry, and for 12 years he was an engineering consultant and did numerous studies regarding mining operations and noises. He is familiar with decibel levels produced, and these would be below the decibel levels allowed by PCA. Mining properties near Carver have increased because of reclamation efforts. Zefere Lusignan, 3650 Eagle Creek Blvd. , expressed concern relative to water flow, pointing out flooding problems on CR83 now. Howard Rosenwinkel pointed out that the berming they will do will help the water prob- lem in places, otherwise the water will flow just like it does now. Mr. Lusignan explained that he had previously tried to get a shallow ditch put in to alleviate the flooding, but the current property owner at that time objected, so the problem still exists. He stated the mining operation cannot run water to his property. Mr. .kosenw_inkel explained that the berm to the north side should help somewhat, but it won't change existing natural drainage. Mr. Lusignan stated that he has a poultry operation which can't tolerate such noise. He also asked if the Planning Commission is giving anyone else a permit for sand and gravel mining. Shakopee Planning Commission 1 July 9, 1981 / Page 5 Chrm. Schmitt answered that the Planning Commission has received no other applica- tions, but that any other mining operation application would be heard in the same manner as this one. Mr. Lusignan asked about the 80 acres to the west, Killarney Hills and how a mining operation would affect the property values. Harold Schneider, 3300 Valley View Road, said his property abuts the site in 3 areas, east, south and southwest, and they have 2 dwellings on the property which would be affected. Mr. Schneider stated that some years ago Oscar Roberts made application to the town- ship board for a mining permit at the present site of the Junior High School and Scenic Heights Add'n. , and was denied. What if that was approved, look how it would affect Shakopee. At that time the area there was basically the same as this current land use around the proposed site. He feels this would devaluate his property for at least 25-30 years and feels the ap- plicant should reimburse him for this devaluation of property. He asked why is it OK to have the traffic through the agricultural zoneand not urban. This is a drastic land use change. The City Planner responded that he agreed the land .use would be changed drastically. The ordinance does provide as a conditional use a mining operation in an agricultural zone. There is an appropriate place for gravel mines and the Planning Commission in this ordinance has suggested that an agricultural location would be appropriate for a mining operation. Harold Schneider pointed out that this agricultural zone is very close to the city. He also thinks that CR16 would have a lot of increased traffic, as he doesn't believe 990 of the truck traffic from the proposed mine would go to Hwy. 101. There could be 200 trucks in and 200 trucks out in a day, and this is a lot of traffic and CR16 should be restricted. Myron Webster stated he lives just north of the site and he thinks the increased traffic would be just tragic. Chrm. Schmitt stated that CR83 is designated as a Collector Street, and at some time in the future it will be upgraded to handle additional traffic because of growth in the Industrial Park. This may or may not be a way to get the road improved with the County and State's assistance. This is just a possibility, but something to think about. Gene Hauer, stated he is the developer of Hauer Add'n, and he put up a map and pointed out the proximity of nearby landowners. He said there are about 500 acres in Hauer Add'n and they are building new houses and moving to the east and getting close to the area of the proposed site. They can sewer to within 4 mile of the northwest cor- ner of the site. If the permit is granted, they will have a hard time getting it developed further. He stated it would devaluate all their properties. He admitted the bypass is also a limiting factor for them for W1W2velopmenL. Robert Schaefer, Route 1, Shakopee, stated he lives on CR83 actually across the City line into Prior Lake. He asked how much weight is actually given to the proposed by- pass. He said the applicant is suggesting 400 vehicle trips a day, which is a truck every 18 minutes in a 12 hr. day or a truck every 1.2 minutes in an 8 hr. day. Who . Shakopee Planning Commission ` July 9, 1981 Page 6 . will pay for the impact of traffic on CR83? We need to hear more specifics about who will pay and whether or not CR83 will be upgraded and what about surcharge and bonds. It will take 65 years to deplete the mine at the projected rate of removal, so there are very long-term effects. Iie stated the 90 decibels of noise emissions stated by the applicant are those allowable by OSHA to protect the crusher operator; 60 decibels is the limit allowed by PCA, that is just like normal speech. Sheila Mitchell, stated she formerly lived near the site and now lived in the "safe" part of the city. She asked about who will be monitoring performance to make sure the applicant is complying if there is a performance bond required. She asked how high the fence around the pit would be, how high is safe? If it takes 65 years to take the material out, how long will it take to fill it in. She disagrees that it is as easy to stop something once it is started. She said what we have is fear of the un- known. There are too many generalities, the answers are not concrete enough. She also questioned using the pit as a demolition landfill because of the perculation, as she thought the PCB' s and other detrimental agents would filter down to the water table. Dave Czaja, 5262 Eagle Creek Blvd. , stated that he and Todd Becken have been involved with the City of Shakopee, with the Department of Natural Resources and the Hydrolo- gist for the City and the State, as well as the Hydrologist for the Shiely Corp. and had a lot of information as far as ground water involvement with the proposed mining operation. Mr. Czaja showed a slide presentation with various charts and graphs relative to water flow and berms and topography. He stated the water flows to the northeast and there will be water flowing to the open pit. They also plan to store 5000 gallons of fuel on the site and he is concerned with leakage and contamination of groundwater. He said the applicants states the pit floor will be at 750 feet, and at one well they found water at 742 feet, so that is only a few feet above the water table. Mr. hosenwinkel stated they propose to be 15-20 feet above the water table. Mr. Czaja presented information regarding a false water table which is created by the Shiely Corp. 's pumping activities. If Shiely stops pumping, he believes the water table will rise higher, and then the danger of contamination is much greater. Mr. Czaja stated the proposed site is a primary recharge area for the Jordan-Prairie DuChein Aquafer. The water from the pit would only be 8-15 feet above the aquafere. He stated the Metro conditions for a major recharge area should be met and included i County and Municipal plans. The guidelines provide that Counties an : Municipalities should not allow alterations of the recharge area which would negatively affect the area. Counties and Municipalities should allow nothing that has an adverse affect on the quality or quantity of groundwater in a recharge area. Mr. Czaja stated that studies have shown that the Shiely pumping has had a downdraw affect on the water table, and the actual water table level is 764 feet, or 14 feet above the 750 foot level calculated to be dug. Mr. Czaja also stated there has been some contamination in wells along CR16. The source has not been identified, but AG land could be a factor, as there are high concentrates of nitrates. Groundwater flow from Metro maps indicate the general direction of water is to the north to the river. Residents with wells in this area would soon see the contamination, he believes. Mr. Czaja also stated the City had wells in this area. • Shakopee Planning Commission / d July 9, 1981 Page ? • The City Engineer stated there is a City well under contract for construction immediately to the north of the proposed site. Mr. Rosenwinkel stated he is concerned about the groundwater and flow, but when they contacted the County health officials and the State DNR hydrologist, he was told they didn't know enough about it to make any remarks. He would like to have some concrete information from the State Hydrologist's office and not just speculation. Mr. Czaja stated he is just trying to establish that we don't really know where the water table is. Chrm. Schmitt stated he recommends we cease testimony at 11:00 P.M. , which would give 2 hrs. of testimony. He asked if there was anyone in the audience who would like to make any comments for the proposal. Mr. Rosenwinkel stated that they were concerned about devaluation of properties and in May had an outside firm search for similar properties to study. Ken Lewis was present to present his study. Xenneth Lewis of Kenneth Lewis & Associates, 6600 France Avenue, Edina, stated he had made a preliminary survey of various gravel pits about what happened to property values. He made a study of 3 gravel pits which were the most similar to the proposed one. Pearson Pit, 160th and CR44; He talked with a number of real estate sales people who live in the subdivision directly across from the gravel pit. This pit is 120 feet deep and they are now into the water table. They have bermed up around the entire pit. He analyzed one property located on White Drive which was experiencing truck traffic, but no noise. He had limited findings on that pit, hut there was no devaluation. Fisher Sand and Gravel, Apple Valley: Looked at the Greenleaf Add'n. He had appraisals before and after the subdivision. The operation is bermed and cannot be seen. He talked with one property owner who had a house on a large lot. She indicated there was some dust, but noise was not a problem. She wouldn't change her lot for another. He looked at another property on Floridian Court where the buyer and seller indicated no adverse affect from the gravel pit. He analyzed this pit the most, as similar Arden Hills Arsenal Gravel Pit: . Spoke to Duane Diedrick, developer north of CRI. The gravel pit there is 1 mile off the road and heavy truck traffic is the only affect for surrounding area. From his sales transactions, Mr. Diedrick stated he is not experiencing any adverse affects from truck traffic. Ken Rutt, Route 2, Box 46, stated he was the exception, his property is within the proposed berm, and asked Mr. Lewis if he would buy a property like his. Chrm. Schmitt asked if Mr. Lewis had anaylyzed the Hedburg operation in Edina. 'Mr. Lewis said he appraised all the land from Xerxes to Southdale. That sand and gravel operation is finishing up now and being developed with apartments and condo- miniums and housing for the elderly. Residential area abutting the operation is being built up with $300,000 housing. He stated it was difficult to analyze this area be- cause the pit was so old, but he didn't find any devaluation. Someone in the audience asked for addresses of these $300,000 homes, and Mr. Lewis said he would have to look it up. Mr. Lusignan stated that the Hedburg operation was very different in that when that operation is through there will not be a hole in the ground, they are just taking away a hill. • Shakopee Planning Commission j July 9, 1981 Page 8 Vern Lang, 612 East 3rd Avenue, stated he is the Secretary-Treasurer for Prestige Park, which owns the Kilarney Hills development. They bought the property in 1967, 14 years ago. At'that time they did everything possible to check with Metro Council, Scott County and Eagle Creek Township and they got nothing. The bypass has possibly ended their development. He stated that at one time Karin O'Brien was first denied a permit to build a building because of the proposed bypass, but later he was given a permit because they felt if it went to Court they wouldn't be able to justify deny- ing it because of something so nebulous as the bypass. He stated he just wanted to get this in the record so they could negotiate with the City later. Tim Keane stated he is not a directly impacted resident, but is an individual concerned with Shakopee and its land use. He requested that this body take action tonight by denying the application for the Conditional Use Permit. His first reason is that the site is located on prime agricultural land. This would be a loss of substantial farm land, of which 3 million acres are lost each year. He stated we can't continue to depend on technology, which is dependent upon cheap energy, to increase our food production. This is the type of land we should be protecting. This use is not consistent with the Comprehensive Flan. This site is designated for preservation as AG land. A conditional use is only that, and shouldn't be given automatic approval because it is listed as a conditional use. Mr. Keane stated that the applicant has not complied with the conditions set forth to make application. He stated the consulting engineer is not registered with the State. The traffic study and hydrological report raised more questions than they answered. It did not answer the need to upgrade the roads, who will pay for that. The applicant has not demonstrated a need for gravel on a regional scale. Mr. Keane stated he believed it would be premature to grant this permit to take prime AG land out of use when there is no demonstrated need for gravel in the area. Mr. Keane stated he did not believe the information presented met the criteria an ap- plicant must meet before this body can issue a permit by ordinance. The applicant has not shown that the proposed use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other properties nor substantially devaluate other properties; that it will not impede normal and orderly development and improvement; that adequate utilities, access road and drainage are provided; that adequate measures will be taken to prevent noise, dust, vibration or other nuisance or that no disturbance to neighboring properties will result. He stated the potential problems are most serious. He stated a neigh- boring property could not obtain an FHA loan guarantee with a 90 decibel noise emission level. Mr. Keane stated that 400 truck trips a day does constitute a potential traffic hazard, with heavily loaded trucksentering Hwy. 101. Mr. Keane stated he felt the benefits to the City have not been demonstrated to make such a drastic land use change. He says the only benefit would be to the seller and users of gravel. The Cost is heavy and he requests this proposal not be tabled, but be denied on the basis of No. 1, 3, 5, 7, 8 and 9 as required by Section 11.04, Sub- sectian 6 of the City Code. Chrm. Schmitt asked Mr. Keane under what conditions would he anticipate having to use the conditional use permit for mining and how would you possibly cope for the growing need for resources. Shakopee Planning Commission /( July 9, 1981 Page 9 Mr. Keane stated that the ordinance was adopted two months before his tenure with the City as City Planner. He would have agreed to mining permits when that is the only reasonable use the' property owner has, as when the land is overburdened. If an owner could argue hardship and no other productive use of the land, then mining could be considered. He stated there is no question that the resource is there, he just questions when the property should be taken out of productive land use to tap the resource, as this is a irreplaceable change of use. Howard1 enwinkel told Mr. Keane to check the National Directory of Engineers, as he is registered there. The City Planner stated that he does not think this body has the authority to question the need for the resource. That is a private decision that the marketplace should determine. This is a private commercial venture. He then added that he want to make it clear that he is a very strong proponent of AG land preservation. A certain amount of AG land will inevitably be used for commercial & industrial development and the one who wants to develop residential areas also takes AG land. We live in an agricultural area where almost all land is AG land and, therefore, necessary to convert to provide for the orderly growth of cities. The City Planner clarified his point that he doesn't believe the applicant has the right to use AG land for mining because it is listed as a conditional use. He believes he has the option to request the use. The property is designated AG land in the Comprehensive Development Plan, and a mining operation is a conditional use in an AG Zone. If the intent of the Planning Commission was not to permit mines in AG Zones, it should not have listed it in that zoning. If the conditions are reasonable for the permit and willing to be met by the applicant, it is an appropriate use of the land. Comm. Coller asked if there was someone in the audience who had something to offer that has not been heard, a different perspective. Coller/Vierling moved to extend the hearing for another 10 minutes and allow anyone to present any new facts for 2 minutes each. Motion carried unanimously. Robert Simons stated that Mr. and Mrs. Rutt's property is the exception. They have a parcel of land approximately 5 acres in size, together with 33 feet of right of way for ingress and egress to the property. The proposed pit will border the excepted area on 4 sides. With the berm, they are imprisoning 5 acres of land, and it is inconceivable to say that this doesn't violate the ordinance with respect to diminution of property value. Ken Giske, St. Louis Park, stated he is a horse owner and that he boards his horse on a ranch nearby and there are other horse boarding operations near the proposed site. He stated it will not be good to ride a horse down the road with 400 gravel trucks passing by. He stated he hopes the permit will be denied because it interferes with his recreational rights. Gene Rosenwinkelstated that he was working as a property consultant. All testing of the site shows good road and concrete sand and gravel. The President of the National Ready Mix Assoc. skid that unless we find new deposits of material like this, we will have a hard time building anything. July 9, 1981 Page 10 " • Mr. Gillard, Edina, stated he owns 40 acres across CR83. He ran a real estate busi- ness for 40 years, and anyone who tells you an operation like this doesn't depreciate property is just whistling dixie. When Shakopee incorporated Eagle Creek Township, it wasn't for a gravel pit, it was for residential expansion. All of that area is potential residential. You are not just taking 130 acres out, but 500-600 acres be- cause the surrounding areas are bound to be affected. Comm. Koehnen stated she: doesn't feel the Planning Commission has a right to put a time limit on a public hearing. She lives in the area and feels she has not been heard. She requested a poll of the audience to see if anyone wants to be heard yet. Chrm. Schmitt asked if it was the consensus of the Commission to ask for a show of hands if anyone has any further issues. The consensus was yes, and one hand was raised. Todd Becken stated he lives on CR16. He put up a map and stated he got his informa- tion from the U.S. Geological Survey Map which shows the sites of gravel pits in the area. He pointed out that there were quite a few gravel pits nearby and questions if there is a demand for gravel and rock that can't be met by these already operating gravel pits. Mr. Becken stated he doesn't think a rehabilitated gravel pit is possible, its a big joke. A developer is not that concerned about what will happen 65 years down the line. He looked at Roberts Pit which has been closed for years. It is just a big dump with a lot of erosion. Roberta Schneider stated her association just felt there were too many unanswered questions in the application itself. It wasn't as specific as it should have been when you are talking about as drastic a land change as this. It is her contention that there is sufficient supporting documentation to deny the permit. Comm. Koehnen stated that the nearest residence to the site is much closer than the 1000 feet indicated on the Environmental Worksheet. Also, there are two horse ranches nearby and before this proposal is voted upon she would like to get an answer to a question about where does the waste material from the horses go, does it go directly down or move laterally? She requested that the people that were sent the Environmental Worksheet should answer this. Howard Rosenwinkel stated they were referring to the residential development of Kilarney Hills as being about 1000 feet away. They had pointed out that the nearest residence was more like 350 feet away. Chrm. Schmitt stated the Commission should be careful about this issue so they are not denying a permit for the use of one property because of the unsatisfactory u'se of an adjoining property. Linda Schaefer, stated she lives on CR83. She asked about who would enforce the con- ditions attached to the permit if granted. The City Planner stated the City does. It is one of the functions of his position and also one of the functions of the annual review. On a periodic basis it would be checked, and if violations were detected at any point in time the situation would have to be corrected immediately or the permit revoked. Comm. Perusich stated that generally speaking the public polices the problems when they see any violations and report them. The City Planner added that they do not drive around the City looking for violations because of the time involvtd. When a violation occurs, we are generally notified by the public. , ' July 9, 1981 O Page 11 Mr. Czaja stated he takes objection to the public policing when it comes to something like groundwater contamination which cannot be seen. He also brought up the safety factor in the area, as he believes the intersection of CR16 and CR83 is a dangerous area. Chrm. Schmitt asked him to further clarify his statements about the well contaminations. Mr. Czaja stated they found a high concentration of nitrates in the wells. They don't know what caused the contamination, but his point is he feels if the pit goes in the loss of filtration would cause further contamination in this primary recharge area. Cncl. Leroux stated there has been a lot of talk of a landfill going in there and this should be given no consideration. The site has been denied by the Landfill Siting Task Force and the Landfill Advisory Committee. They have made their decision and for- warded it to the PCA. Unless the County over-rules its appointed Landfill Siting Committee, there will be no landfill at that site, either hazardous or demolition. Comm. Coller stated he has written down 17 questions and is not prepared to make a decision tonight until many items are clarified. Comm. Perusich stated he would like to see a list of specific questions the audience has on the issue. Then he would. suggest the Commission add to the list their specific questions and present them to the consultant to answer specifically and then report back at a future meeting. Coller/Vierling moved that the public hearing on this matter be continued until the October 8, 1981 Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Rosenwinkel asked that City staff answer as many questions as possible before sending the list on to him. The City Planner informed him that the answers to the questions were his responsibility. Motion carried unanimously. Comm. Coller requested 3 volunteers from the audience to represent the audience and draw up a formal list of questions to be submitted to the City Planner within 30 days. Chrm. Schmitt asked Comm. Coller to act on behalf of the Planning Commission to list the questions of the Commission. Comm. Coller agreed. Audience volunteers are Mr. David Czaja, Robert Schaefer, Roberta Schneider & Tim Keane. Perusich/Stoltzman moved to recess at 11:4.0 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Chrm. Schmitt called the meeting to order at 11:50 P.M. Coller/Perusich moved to enter the Petitions submitted in opposition of the requested Conditional Use Permit and Mining Permit, into the record. Motion carried with Comm. Koehnen abstaining. PUBLIC HEARING - Amending Shakopee City Code Coller/Vierling moved to open the public hearing on amending the City Zoning Ordinance to require a bond for the moving of structures. Motion carried unanimously. " r July 9, 1981 /57/ Page 12 Chrm. Schmitt asked for comments from the audience, and there were none. Coller/Stoltzman moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Coller/Perusich moved to recommend to the City Council amending the Shakopee City Code Section 11.05, Subd. 9 by adding a sentence to Item D. , as follows "A bond shall be required equal in amount to the cost necessary to abate deficiencies." and be adding a sentence to Item F. No. 1, "A bond shall be required equal in amount to the cost necessary to abate deficiencies". Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING - Comprehensive Development Plan Perusich/Coller moved to open the public hearing on amendments and adoption of Comp- rehensive Development Plan to conform with the Metropolitan Council's requirements. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion was held regarding the changes made and the lack of information about how the changes affect the Plan. Chrm. Schmitt asked staff to prepare a guide of the changed areas and the original language to show comparisons. The City Planner stated he didn't have much information about it. The City Admr. stated he could arrange the additional information. Coller/Perusich moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Coller/Vierling moved to table action on the Comprehensive Development Plan to the next meeting. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING - Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Coller/Stoltzman moved to open the public hearing on the Five Year Capital Improvement Program. Motion carried unanimously. The City Admr. stated this should be acted upon before the end of the month, and suggested if there were any questions it could be re-scheduled for the meeting on July 23, 1981. Chrm. Schmitt asked about inclusion of street and railroad crossing problems and traffic pattern changes, which would include upgrading and downgrading streets. The City Engineer.stated the Pavement Evaluation is the first step in this plan. The City Admr. stated they are looking for suggestions and additions. Chrm. Schmitt asked for comments from the audience, and there were none. Coller/Vierling moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Coller/Perusich moved to continue this item to the next meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Informational Items The City Planner informed the Commission that the City Council adopted the Sign Ordi- nance with a provision exempting Municipal signs from any size limitations. The CityPlanner suggested meeting on July 23, 1981 for further discussion on the Minnesoa Valley Mali traffic study. Shakopee Planning Commission 4 July 9, 1981 Page 13 Perusich/Vierling moved that when the Planning Commission adjourns, it adjourn to July 23, 1981. ,Motion carried unanimously. The City Planner informed the Commission about the problem John Radermacher is having in trying to move an existing garage from Block 57 (Courthouse parking lot) to his lot located at 140 E. 3rd Avenue. His problem involves the time frame he has to meet in order to remove the garage . He further stated that the time frame placed on Mr. Radermacher by the sellers would not allow for the normal Conditional Use Permit request process. He then suggested interpreting the ordinance to provide administrative authority over moving accessory structures. Coller/Vierling moved to waive the requirements for a Conditional Use Permit to move the garage from Block 57 to Lot 10, Block 18, Original Shakopee Plat, as has been requested by John Radermacher. Motion carried unanimously. Coller/Vierling moved to have staff draft guidelines indicating when accessory buildings should be reviewed by City staff and when staff should be delegated responsibility to make decisions as to determination of whether conditional use permits should be required for accessory buildings. Motion carried unanimously. Comm. Coller suggested staff send a letter to the 4 individuals who volunteered from the audience regarding the Mining Permit and summarize that they are to draw up a list of specific concerns that are answerable by the applicant and to give them the date they should be submitted. Comm. Coller also asked the Commissioners to get their concerns to him so he can do the same. Coller/Perusich moved that staff be directed to send a letter to John Laudon of the Shakopee Sports Center noting that members of the Planning Commission have observed the improvement of the Shakopee Sports Center area and are commending him. Motion carried unanimously. Comm. Coller spoke about the safety factor of the basement door openings of the Opera House Saloon and was informed the Building Inspector has talked to the establishment about it and required the owner to make repairs. Chrmn. Schmitt asked staff to check on residential occupancy of store fronts on 1st Avenue. The City Planner stated he would check on it and report back. Coller/Perusich moved to adjourn to July 23, 1981. Motion carried unaimously. Meeting adjourned at 12:20 AM. John Schmitt Chairman Diane S. Beuch Recording Secretary PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JULY 23, 1981 Chrm. Schmitt called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. with Comm. Perusich, Stoltzman, Koehnen, Rockne and Coller (arriving at 7:40) present. Absent was Comm. Vierling. Also present were Council Liaison Leroux; City Planner Don Steger; City Engineer H. R. Spurrier and City Admr. John K. Anderson. Dave Warner of Bennet-Ringrose-Wolsfeld-Jarvis-Gardner, Inc. (BRW) gave a presenta- tion regarding the traffic study of the Minnesota Valley Mall area. Mr. Warner stated he identified 5 areas of concern: 1. Access to center; 2. Entrances operating safely and of adequate capacity; 3. Presence of through traffic in residential areas; 4. How to develop remaining undeveloped land while maintaining good traffic access to the center; 5. Match up with future anticipated programs, such as by-pass. His guidelines were to separate incompatible traffic flow (behind Kmart especially); direct traffic to streets designated as collectors; use roads effectively, such as for buffers; access to inplace utilities; minimize investment (not too many roads) and maintain development potential. Comm. Coller arrived at this point, 7:40 P.M. Mr. Warner recommended Alternative No. 6, which is to extend 13th Avenue almost to the r-o-w for the Shakopee By-pass and to the north and west to make a new entrance to the parking lot of the shopping center; 12th Avenue would be extended to the cul.-de-L;ae; Lath cn.0 be extended c.e;tward ucroce the City without any .serious obstacles. Since it may be some time until 13th Ave. is extended to the East, an interim solution would be to extend 12th Avenue to the rear of the shopping center. Chrm. Schmitt stated that we are operating with the assumption that 13th Avenue would be the collector street. He questioned if the site line was appropriate at 13th & Adams. City Engineer stated that at that intersection there is no geometric problem; Mr. Warner stated it is good to have collector streets continue for a good distance so local streets can feed into them, and 13th can more easily do that than 12th. Chrm. Schmitt stated they had previously been told they could not take property in Lion's Park for street as this was a land transaction from the State strictly for park dedication. He suggested this item be studied. Cncl. Leroux stated that with the adveht of the bypass, Adams Street will be moved to the east, so that should be kept in mind in aligning 13th Avenue. Dick Wiggin stated he has purchased property near the shopping center and wanted to present a proposal for solving the traffic problem. He put up a drawing which presented his ideas of extending 13th Ave. westward to the end of the lots he is platting, and block off 12th Ave. , continue Taylor Street and make another entrance to the shopping center in any of several locations, which leaves numerous options. With his proposal he can use lots on both sides of 13th Avenue. Shakopee Planning Commission July 23, 1981 / Page 2 Further discussion was held regarding the possibility of getting roadway out of Lion's Park to enable a collector street to proceed uninterrupted across the City. The City Planner stated that it is accepted that an east-west collector street is in order in addition to 10th. He thinks the right-of-way for 12th is not appro- priate, and it is too close to 10th. We still need to design another entrance to the shopping center to get the traffic away from the back. Further discussion ensued on the different alternatives and advantages and disadvantages. Gary Laurent stated he realized the Commission is addressing a complex problem, but would like some action taken soon so he can continue to develop his property. Chrm. Schmitt asked for any comments from the audience. Shelly Johnson stated he is representing Bob Dalton and the Minnesota Valley Mall, and they are concerned with the financing responsibilities for any new roadway, and where a roadway ceases to be a public roadway. The City Admr. stated the intent right now is to take the 12th Street entrance and move it to the southwest and adjoin it to the parking lot. Mr. Warner stated his intent would be to make a positive physical barrier between the road and the back of Kmart to separate the types of traffic. Dick Wiegel, representing Watson Construction, stated that he felt 50% - 80% of the traffic on 12th was from people trying to get from east to west, beyond the shopping center. He suggested checking on the destinations of people driving there. The City Engineer stated that from the figures available to them from traffic counts, the counts are much higher during the operation of the mall. The actual traffic count does not show that it is being used as a shortcut. Coller/Stoltzman moved that based on the traffic study presented by :,RW and the evaluation criteria presented, concept approval be give to Alternative No. 3, described as to provide a 12th Ave. to 13th Ave. loop. To provide access to the shopping center, 13th Ave. is extended to a new entrance at the front face of the center, and enter herwith as an official part of the record, the attached map as "Exhibit A" detailing Alternative No. 3, which offers a better interim solution and future options by closing the existing access and moving it to the southwest. Motion carried unanimously. The City Admr. stated that at the previous joint meetin , with City Council, there was considerable concern regarding the upgrading of the intersection of the mall and Hwy. 300. This could be added to the Capital Improvements Projects, or could direct staff to look at it now. The City Adn.r. also stated that several Councilmembers had concerns about the en- trance funneling traffic into the parking lot at the front of the businesses and had suggested a perimeter road around the parking lot. Mr. Warner stated that this was not recommended because it is a large amount of roadway to be constructed without providing significant access, so it is very costly. The other reason is that the conflict of traffic and pedestrians at the face of the building is inevitable, even when a perimeter road is provided. Chrm. Schmitt stated that putting in a perimeter road bisects diagonally a parcel of property, rendering it useless and eliminating development, putting the burden of the construction cost of the street on the community, rather than a developer. Shakopee Planning Commission July 23, 1981 Page 3 Cncl. Leroux stated he thought by putting the roadway out along the bypass r-o-w, you could allow some development within the area and have a buildable piece of property. Comm. Coller recommended not advising where to exactly extend the roadway, but to leave it open for options. PUBLIC HEARING - (CONT. ) - Comprehensive Development Plan Coller/Koenen moved to continue the public hearing on the amendments & adoption of the Comprehensive Development Plan. Motion carried unanimously. Chrm. Schmitt asked for comments from the audience, and there were none. Coller/Koehnen moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Coller/Perusich moved to approve as revised the Comprehensive Development Plan and to recommend adoption to the City Council. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING - (CONT. ) - Five year Capital Improvement Plan Perusich/Koehnen moved to continue the public hearing on the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. Motion carried unanimously. The City Admr. explained the ranking criteria for the projects. He asked if there were any projects that weren't on the list that should be definitely considered in the next 6 years. The other consideration should be to compare if the Capital Improvement Plan matches the 5 year Comp Plan. Chrm. Schmitt stated he thinks we should establish traffic patterns by upgrading some streets and downgrading others and thinking about where we want railroad crossings. He asked what the catagory Pavement Evaluation means. The City Engineer stated this is the first step in identifying street classifications. This process would rate the streets, and with that information we could have a traffic engineer evaluate our grid system and determine what appropriate measures could be taken to funnel traffic to certain streets so we don't overbuild all the streets. The City Admr. suggested adding Traffic/Street Plan on the line with Pavement Evaluation. Chrm. Schmitt said we should identify that there is a suc- ceeding procedure for future street projects as per traffic study. Comm. Coller suggested acquiring the vacant railroad right-of-way next to the library and expanding the library. The City Admr. said he would put in on the list. Comm. Coller suggested the ice arena, be added to the CIP. City Adm. stated there is a place for projects that have private donations, so that could be added. Chrm. Schmitt stated there should be some unnamed collector street paralleling the Valley Interceptor. There should be a frontage road from Conklin to Cavenaugh Dr. as a concept, maybe listed but not rated. The City Admr. stated the County has asked for direction from the City regarding its .desires concerning: any county road projects. Shakopee Planning Commission July 23, 1981 /' Page 4 / said he thought if the City did the CR83 project, it could wait on the CR17 project. Comm. Koehnen stated she thought we should check with the County, but she thought a lot of people were taking CR21 and CR17 to get around the City to Hwy. 41. The City Admr. stated he thought this Capital Improvement Plan would help coordinate large projects, serve as a "laundry list" to keep projects in front of you and not have any get lost & it also answers funding questions. There was a brief discussion about putting in a lineal municipal golf course along the Upper Valley Drainage system and encourage expensive development along it. Comm. Coller suggested we might want to put up another building for senior citizens. He also suggested some project to look at transportation systems. The City Admr. informed the members about the re-evaluating being done by the Met Council relative to providing transit service to Shakopee and that our representa- tive for MTC will be appearing at the next meeting of the Council, and he welcomed anyone interested to come to that meeting. Discussion followed. It was decided to put transit service on the list. Coller/Rockne moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Perusich/Coller moved to send the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program, with additions made tonight, to City Council. Motion carried unanimously. DISCUSSION - Moving Accessory Structures The City Planner stated he felt it is a burden to have a person go through a public hearing just to move a shed or garage; this is not serving the good of the public. Cncl. Leroux asked if the Ordinance should be addressed to allow this procedure. The City Planner stated he didn't think it would be necessary to change the ordi- nance as this is just an interpretation. The City Admr. suggested taking this as an administrative alternative at this time and set it up for review to see if the ordinance needs to be changed. Further discussion. Coller/Koehnen moved to endorse guidelines as follows: 1. The structure must be clearly accessory in nature. 2. The accessory structure must be compatible with adjoining structures in the proposed location. 3.. The accessory structure must be equal or exceeding in value of the adjoining accessory structures in the proposed location. 4. The owner must show proof of ownership of the proposed location. 5. The accessory structure must meet all requirements of the Building Code within three months after it is moved. A bond shall be required equal in amount to the cost necessary to abate deficiencies. 6. All setback and zoning requirements must be met. These guidelines cover the administrative review of the moving of accessory structures. Motion carried unanimously. INFORMATIO NA L The Link variance appeal will be heard by City Council August 4, 1981 at 8:00 P.M. Chrm. Schmitt mentioned that maintenance is needed at Tahpah Park on players benches. Perusich/Stoltzman moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 11:20 P.M. Diane S. Brsueh, Recording Sec. .. ----H----- 7""H":-- // •Xhi bib / / Vt- ' V. -------iiii- .6,1 / Cry/ i / a h i , :<\' is71 �' / 50:,YI roan I .aRl ! ._1 L___...7-1 //1 .. / .. . \ L.... ,_ OW ..... I 41 P4 bat 4 ., . , , ...... in IIII ,`/ i —_.y ...•�1 w�11/A I f .Arta U-..— • S , - , -1 :* 7 MINNESOTA VALLEY *7 SIM / MAIL w ...1Z 7 ^A IMIEP it WE L a 6 , ct 111111 Pl. 11:1 7 , 4•3;\' ' 1\s 1 ,,(,'' • I Illri r.--- \„..,,,,k. �ttttttttttt s �' ::.1./4".:Y4,7 • .4 ___ --1 I i'‘ . .' ' 1:-----1 .111.11 •• •419, i \ii,-# "... • i i • _• ? / PROPOSED 11 _ ',TIN- ' '4/6- _' PROPOSED • w tttttttttt 1 1 TH 101 R.O.W. , " COLLECTOR MrwisiQ `^I i sr, • • f Viso Srtt : � -aMp t0 oA; I 44 l . tu o a CC CD • ..�.� ~ FIGURE 3 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ANALYSIII ALTERNATIVE 3 MINNESOTA VALLEY MALLal SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA LEGEND Ilittttul PROPOSED ROADWAY 77..77 IF 11% n-Film %IAIa FNTRANRR n ?nn' enn' qnn' a , TENTATIVE AGENDA SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION AUGUST 4, 1981 Mayor Harbeck presiding 1 ] Roll Call at 7 : 30 P.M. 2 ] Approval of Minutes of July 14 , 1981 3 ] Communications : 4] Liaison Reports from Councilmembers 5 ] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS 6 ] Old Business : a ] Change in route #53S to Senior Citizen Highrise b] Levy for Metro Transit Commission (bring 8h from 7/7 mtg. ) c ] Sale of Ambulance and Assignment of Proceeds (bring 6a from 7/21) d] Report on Dishwasher at Highrise e ] Limits on Change Orders and Quantity Changes w/o Prior Approval by City Council f ] J. I . Case Permit g] SAC Charges for Hauer Addition Sewer Service Connections 7 ] Planning Commission Recommendations : a] 8 :00 P.M. - Public Hearing - Link Variance Appeal (Project at CR 17 and 10th Avenue) b] Comprehensive Plan - Final Revisions 8 ] Routine Resolutions and Ordinances : a] Res . No. 1889 , A Resolution Declaring The Cost To Be Asssessed And Ordering The Preparation Of Proposed Assessment 81-11 (STH 101 Watermain) b] Res . No. 1887 , A Resolution Authorizing Execution Of Amendment To Planning Assistance Grant And Requesting Payment of Grant Funds 9 ] New Business : a] Solid Waste Incineration and Energy Recovery Systems b] Purchase of Propane Dispensing Equipment c ] Res . No . 1890, A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 1706 Adopting The 1981 Budget d ] Proposed Park Usage Ordinance - Discussion e] Suburban Rate -Authority Agreement f] Audit Services for 1981 g] Discussion of Assessment Hearings Scheduled for August 11 h] Approval of the Bills 10] Consent Business : a] Approve the completion of the probationary period for Therese Lenning and authorize a salary increase b] Application for an On Sale Temporary Beer License c ] Shakopee Fire Department ' s Services for the 1981 Renaissance Festival 1 TENTATIVE AGENDA Page -2- August 4, 1981 d ] Easements for 80-4 CR 16 Utilities e ] Eastside Park Warming House 11 ] Other Business : a ] Engineering Department Monthly Report - July 26 , 1981 b] Rod Krass has informed me that the Ice Arena Case has been settled , therefore we did not prepare the memo that was requested 12 ) Adjourn to Tuesday , August 11 , 1981 at 7 : 30 P.M. John K. Anderson City Administrator TENTATIVE AGENDA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE Regular Session August 4, 1981 Chairman Hullander presiding 1 . Roll call at 7 :00 P.M. 2 . Approval of minutes of July 7, 1981 3 . Macey Second Addition Sidewalk Repair 4. Directions for 1982 5 . Acquisition and Relocation Services - Summary and Analysis 6 . Payment of Bills a. Dean Smith Trenching, $668. 50, final payment on Minnesota Street Project , Grading and Fill . b. Al ' s Landscaping, $2 ,481 . 79, for landscaping for 4th and Minnesota Project . c. Tom Siebenaler, $360.00, for sod for 4th and Minnesota Project . d. Suburban Engineering, $478, for survey work, 4th and Minnesota Project . 7 . Other business 8 . Adjourn Jeanne Andre Executive Assistant PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPECIAL SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA JULY 7, 1981 Chrm. Hullander called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. with Comm. Leroux, Reinke, Lebens and Colligan present. Also present were Jeanne Andre, HRA Director and John K. Anderson, City Admr. Lebens/Colligan moved to accept the special meeting call. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan, Leroux moved to approve the minutes of June 16, 1981 as kept. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Lebens moved to authorize the purchase of landscaping from Al's Nursery, not to exceed $2730.21 and to authorize purchase of sod from Tom Siebenaler at 750 per yard, total cost to be kept within budget of remaining grant funds, 4th & Minn. Comm. Colligan asked if the cost of sod included the laying of it and the HRA Director responded that it did. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Colligan/Reinke moved authorization to reimburse the HRA Director $9.00 for the pur- chase of one copy of Handbook for Commissioners from the National Association of Hous- ing and Redevelopment officials. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Leroux/Colligan moved to accept the 1980 Annual Financial Report of the Shakopee HRA for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1980. Motion carried unanimously. Colligan/Leroux moved to appoint John K. Anderson as Deputy Director of the Shakopee HRA. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion was held regarding the hot water/dishwasher problem at the Senior Citizens Highri se. Reinke/Colligan moved to direct the HRA Director to pursue the various warranties with the dishwasher, contractor and Bor-Son and 200 Levee Drive Associates to correct the hot water problem with the Senior Citizens Highrise. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion was held regarding repair of a portion of sidewalk in Macey Second Add'n relative to assigning blame for damages. SPUC Manager stated that with the informa- tion he presently has, it is not possible to assign responsibility for the damages. The HRA Director indicated that the engineering inspector had seen SPUC em? oyees did .a large hole to install the electrical pedestal . He had warned them about the potential to undermine the sidewalk at the time, and had assigned responsibility to them for the problem when it arose. Leroux/Hullander moved to have the City Engineer inspect all the sidewalk in Macey Second Add'n and come back with a recommendation regarding responsibility for damages. Motion carried unanimously. Leroux/Hullander moved that if there is a critical time problem regarding replacement of a sidewalk portion in Macey Second Add'n, the City could go ahead and make the re- pairs and backcharge the responsible party. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. Leroux/Colligan moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 7:30 P.M. Jeanne Andre, Executive Director HRA Diane S. Beuch, Recording Secretary MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director RE: Macey Second Addition Sidewalk Repair DATE: July 28, 1981 Introduction The HRA reviewed the situation of the damaged sidewalk at its July 7, 1981 , meeting and requested a report from the Office of the City Engineer before making a decision regarding the course of action to repair the sidewalk. Background Attached is the requested report from the Office of City Engineer. Examination of the project turned up only one damaged area. The opinion expressed in the report is that the damage was caused by Shakopee Public Utilities when the power pedestal was installed. Alternatives The HRA still has the same options of ordering the work with payment to be made with grant funds or requesting SPUC to under- take the repair at their expense. It seems obvious from the attached picture that the settle- ment was caused by the installation of the power pedestal . Attachment JA/jam 3 MEMO TO: Jeanne Andre, HRA Director FROM: Ray Ruuska, Engineering Coordinator RE: Macey Addition Sidewalk DATE: July 15, 1981 As you requested, I have done a sidewalk condition survey of this area. All sidewalk is in good condition except for the one panel in question. It seems obvious from the attached picture thattthe settlement was caused by the installation of the power pedestal . RR/jam a • s - MEMO TO: The Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director RE: Directions for 1982 DATE: July 27 , 1981 Background Information I have been asked to sit on the League of Minnesota Cities Committee on Development Strategies which reviews current develop- ments in the area of tax-increment financing, industrial revenue bonding and other financing methods for community development and capital improvements . This committee work should help to build expertise and current knowledge on financing methods to apply to possible downtown redevelopment strategies as well as for other projects which may evolve in the next few years . In addition I would like to attend the annual ICMA (Interna- tional City Managers ' Association) conference this fall in Anaheim, California. This conference will be a resource center for ideas regarding development strategies on a national basis , es- pecially information on how cities can proceed with development within the constraints of new legislation and fiscal restraints at the state and federal level . Attendance at this conference would also contribute to my degree work at the University of Kansas . I want to develop a project for my studies which would look at fi- nance strategies for downtown development in Shakopee. As of June 18, 1981 , $1517 remains in the HRA budget for schools, con- ferences and travel . I estimate the cost of attending this con- ference would range between $950-1200. Requested Action Authorize the HRA Exectutive Director to attend the Interna- tional City Mangers ' Association Conference , September 20-24, 1981 in Anaheim, California, at a cost not to exceed $1200. JA/jam MEMO TO: Members of the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) FROM: Jeanne Andre, Executive Director RE: Acquisition and Relocation Services DATE: July 27, 1981 The attached summary and analysis of relocation and acqui- sition services related to the 1978 Community Development Block Grant was provided in response to a request by HRA members . Attachment JA/jam Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revitalization Project (1978 Community Development Block Grant) Acquisition and Relocation Services - Summary and Analysis Introduction Participation of the City of Shakopee in the 1978 Community Development Block Grant , Fourth and Minnesota Neighborhood Revita- lization Project , required administration of acquisition and re- location components of the project . In 1978 the Shakopee Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) contracted with Von Klug and Associates to assist in administering these components . When the work of Von Klug and Associates was completed in 1981 the HRA Commissioners requested an analysis of the services provided in order to determine whether to contract for acquisition and relo- cation services in future projects . Background and Analysis Von Klug and Associates contracted with the HRA in 1978 to provide acquisition and relocation services not to exceed $11 ,395 in value. The services they were to provide were subsequently reduced in the area of acquisition (the HRA staff took on addi- tional functions) and expanded in the area of relocation (addi- tional cases surfaced) and a new not-to-exceed limit of $14,890 was established . The core of the acquisition relocation workload was undertaken in 1979 and the first half of 1980. The final claim was prepared in March of 1981 . At the completion of their work Von Klug had been paid $13 ,759. 92 for services related to the Fourth and Minnesota Project. Advantages of Consultant 1 . Quick, professional service. Von Klug responded in a timely manner to all requests . Clear and easily understood reports were provided. During staff changes for the HRA in 1979, Von Klug carried the major responsibility and assisted in the transition. Representatives from HUD (Department of Housing and Urban Development) accepted and praised the work provided by Von Klug. 2 . Expertise provided. Staff at Von Klug were experienced and offered immediate answers to relocation problems and questions . They have developed forms and a format for delivery of services which provides a clear record of activities . The HUD handbook for Relocation alone is 299 pages long. It would take a long time before newly trained staff could become conversant with relocation policies and procedures . 3 . Distance for HRA from recommended action (cited by Doug Reeder as main advantage) . If an impartial third party is providing recommendations according to established regulations the HRA is insulated from circumstances which might encourage it to 4th & MN Neighborhood Revitalization Project Page 2 reduce relocation benefits to stay within the budget or pro- vide more generous benefits to an old established Shakopee citizen, ,or even the inference that such a bias might occur. 4. HUD Monitor. HUD monitors the areas of relocation and ac- quisition more thoroughly than many other grant components and the City would probably be subject to more problems with grant compliance if an excellant job is not provided in the area of acquisition or relocation. As evident in the problems encountered with federal monitoring of the easement acquisition for CR17 improvements , redoing work initially done wrong is much more costly and cumbersome than doing it correctly the first time . Disadvantages of Consultant 1 . Expense . The City pays more to have expert workers available on demand than it pays for internal staff. However a long- term commitment to staff is avoided. The amount paid to Von Klug for part-time work from 1978 to 1981 was almost the same as the full-time staff cost of the HRA in 1980. 2 . Duplication of efforts . Often both HRA staff and Von Klug staff were involved in following-up a request or action. In addition some clients to be relocated were more apt to be in touch with local HRA staff than more distant personnel at Von Klug. 3 . Technical assistance from HUD. The local HUD office is very willing and able to provide technical assistance in understand- ing and interpreting relevant regulations . As this assistance is available at no charge , it is best to utilize this resource instead of a paid consultant when possible. Given the above considerations , the decision whether or not to hire a consultant for future relocation services still seems to be entirely dependent on the circumstances in effect at that time . In the case of the 1978 block grant the use of a consultant appears to have been the right decision 1 ) because of the con- tinuity provided under three different HRA staff members during the height of the work in 1979, 2) because HRA staff were con- currently involved in other intensive and time-consuming projects such as the creation of the tax-increment district for the high- rise, the administration of the Title III-B grant for highrise equipment and the cable TV franchise , and 3) because this pro- ject involved both residential and business relocation (which is more complex) . I think HRA staff could reasonably become trained in relo- cation regulations and administration given the time and willing- ness to do research and attention to detail . If there is still just one HRA employee , assignment of relocation should be seen as a major task which would preclude extensive activities outside the administration of the block grant . A couple of alternatives 4th & .MN Neighborhood J!� Revitalization Project Page 3 which would be a compromise to hiring a consultant to do the full job would be , 1) hire a consultant to set up activities and pro- vide advice o staff, without actually having the consultant do the work or 2) hire additional part-time temporary help in the HRA to release staff time from day-to-day activities and allow more time for familiarization with regulations . JA/jam May, 1981 MEMO TO: Jeanne Andre, HRA Director FROM: H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer RE: Macey Second Addition DATE: August 4, 1981 Introduction The City has received complaints from property owners along 4th Avenue regarding water that ponds in Outlot A near these properties. Background Thus far the City has constructed one inlet to remove most of the storm water that comes down Market Street, however because upstream inlets lack the capacity to collect the run-off and since even the run-off from Market Street is sufficient to cause water to pond in Outlot A this nuisance water collects. In order to eliminate this storm water it is necessary to construct a tile drain to remove the incidental water. It is estimated that such a drain would cost approximately 2,000.00 if installed by City forces. Recommendation It is the recommendation of City staff that the Public Works Department install the storm drain and inlet to drain an area along the North line of Outlot A. HRS/jms Ok ICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. REG. SESSION SHAKOPFF, 1I NNESOTA JULY 14, 1981 Mayor Harbeck called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. with Cncl. Hullander, Lebens, Reinke, Leroux and Colligan present. Also present were Rod Krass, Ass't City Attorney; H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer and John K. Anderson, City Admr. Hullander/Colligan offered Resolution No. 1880, A Resolution Accepting Bid on 1980-4 County Road 16 Utilities, and moved its adoption. The City Admr. summarized the resolution. The City Engineer stated that the original estimated project cost was $310,000, which was revised to $236,000, and this bid of $167,000 is significantly lower. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Notion carried. Hullander/Colligan offered Resolution No. 1871, A Resolution Declaring the Cost To Be Assessed And Ordering The Preparation Of Proposed Assessment 81-1 (VIP Sanitary Sewer Interceptor), and moved its adoption. The City Engineer gave an explanation of how he arrived at the figures for assessments, identifying three types of cost regarding the interceptor, trunk and lateral pipes. Further discussion ensued regarding benefit area and deferment of assessment for certain areas and SAC charges. Cncl. Reinke stated he felt he did not have enough information on the assessment proce- dure to vote on the project and he felt this was a change in assessment policy. The Mayor directed the City Engineer to come back at the next meeting with more complete figures for benefitted area, where the cut-off is, what the Council's direction is believed to be and how all costs were computed. Cncl. Reinke stated he is personally involved and will abstain from the vote. Roll Call: Ayes; Hullander, Lebens, Leroux, Colligan, Harbeck Noes; None Abstain: Reinke Motion carried. Colligan/Leroux offered Resolution No. 1872, A Resolution Declaring the Cost To Be Assessed and Ordering The Preparation of Proposed Assessment 80-1 Sanitary Sewer Laterals in North Half of Section 8 (Hauer Trail Laterals), and moved its adoption. The City Admr. summarized the resolution. Roll Call: Ayes; Hullander, Lebens, Leroux, Colligan, Harbeck Noes; None Abstain: Reinke Motion carried. Hullander/Lebens offered Resolution No. 1873, A Resolution Declaring the Cost To Be Assessed and Ordering The Preparation of Proposed Assessment 80-3 (Holmes Street Re- construction) (Sanitary Sewer Services, Curb and Gutter and Sidewalk), and moved its adoption. The City Admr. summarized the resolution. Discussion followed regarding additional sidewalk included. Roll Call: Ayes; Unanimous Noes; None Motion carried. The City Admr. stated he had been contacted by members of the Hockey Association, who asked to appear before the Council and outline some of their concerns regarding the Association's relationship to the City and its efforts to develop a viable ice arena. Bill Menden stated that he is the President of the Shakopee Hockey Association, and introduced Mary Goetz, Vice-President, who read a letter to the Council regarding the worth and benefit to the community of having a bubble in the community. Don Lynch made a presentation regarding the financial situation of the Shakopee Hockey Assoc. and the problem of capital investment for the bubble. He stated the ice pro- grans would pay the operating expenses anJ a modest profit, but not capital expenses. The Assoc. is sure it can sell guaranteed ice time and stated Prior Lake and Chaska have requested ice time. The biggest problem is getting the Mechanic's Lien settled, which they are working on. -• _ Shakopee City Council •'1/ Page 2 July 14, 1981 Karen Mathwig stated the Hockey Association is working very hard to settle the Mechanic's Lien against it. They have re-organized drastically and formed a committee to professionally manage the Ice Arena and asked the City Council to appoint a mem- ber to participate on the management committee. The Mayor asked the Ass't City Attorney to respond to the request to involve the City further in the management of the Ice Arena. The Attorney advised against it, stating that would open up the City to additional responsibility and legal liability. Any member of the Council could be involved personally in the Hockey Association, but not as a representative of the City. The City's primary concern is that a suit of this type never occurs again, and there- fore the Ass't City Attorney has suggested an amendment to the lease for the land where the bubble is to require the Hockey Assoc. when it contracts with any labor or material persons to obtain from that individual or group a waiver indicating that the arena is on public property and that its exclusive limits of collecting will be from the Association, and that it waives any right to sue the City or lien the property. The City is also requesting of the management, the officers, directors or whomever, to agree personally to make sure that agreement is being upheld and waivers being received. Don Lynch stated the Assoc. is trying to involve someone from the Council just to look out for the City's interests, maybe an ex officio member. Ms. Iqathwig stated they have learned from their past mistakes and they need the support of the Council for public relations. Cncl. Hullander stated the Assoc. should contact the Councilmembers privately to become involved, and not as representatives of the City. The Mayor stated he has arranged a meeting with various industries to inform them of the Hockey Association and its needs and has done some public relation work for it. The Mayor asked for a financial statement to be supplied by the Association and the amendment to the lease placed in order within the next month. The City Admr. informed Council about unpaid SAC charges in the Hauer Add'n. He said staff made a mistake and informed many people that the SAC charges had been paid, when they actually had not. Discussion followed. Harbeck/Hullander moved the City Attorney assist staff in researching the background of the unpaid SAC charges and assign responsibility for payment and report back to Council. Motion carried unanimously. Walt Muhlenhardt stated that he is appearing at the Waste Control Commission tomorrow night and asked about ownership of the sludge farm and was told by Cncl. Leroux that it is owned by the Metropolitan Council. Leroux/Colligan moved to adjourn to July 21, 1981 at 7:30 P.M. Motion carried unani- mously. Meeting adjourned at 8:55 P.M. to a joint worksession on upper valley drain- age with Jackson Township at their new town hall. John K. Anderson Acting City Clerk Diane S. Beuch Recording Secretary a MEMO TO: Mayor and Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Change in Route #53 S to Senior Citizen Highrise DATE: July 31 , 1981 Introduction The letter attached from Scott Dickson indicates that the Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) is willing to make the route change requested by City Council . Additional Consideration Scott Thompson, also a member of the MTC staff , called Friday to confirm Scott Dickson ' s letter, but asking that Shakopee con- sider the full impact of its request on existing riders . Scott indicated that the route change will add a minimum of 3-5 minutes to the route . This is no problem in the morning, however, in the afternoon the bus will be loaded with people who have been riding for 50 minutes who may well feel the additional 3-5 min- utes are unreasonable for the convenience of the occasional high- rise senior citizen who may ride (one person in last 3-5 weeks) If questioned about why the change was made, MTC can only respond that it was at the request of the Shakopee City Council . This , needless to say, may mean that Council will receive peti- tions or requestsfrom the riders to stop the proposed change. Alternatives 1 . Reaffirm our request for the change. 2 . Drop our request for the change . 3 . Ask MTC to try the run for 2-3 months and evaluate the effect of the change on highrise ridership and existing riders . Summary and Recommendation The MTC is now quite willing to make the change requested by Councill; their point about the additional 3-5 minute wait on the bus after a long day by the majority of passengers is a valid one . Des one or two senior citizen riders per week (or per day) from the highrise warrant making the majority of the users wait the additional 3-5 minutes? I recommend alternative #3 . Action Requested Motion to ask MTC to try the run for 2-3 months and evaluate the effect of the change on highrise ridership and existing riders . Attachment JKA/jam 6 ct_-. q Metropolitan Transit Commission 801 American Center Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612/221-0939 July 29, 1981 RECEIVED Mr. John K. Anderson 0 1981 City Administrator JU1- 3 City of Shakopee 129 E. First AvenueCI.Y OF VAXppEE Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Dear Mr. Anderson: In response to your letter of July 21, 1981, the MTC will make the requested route deviation on Route #53S to the Senior Citizen Highrise. The MTC's Service Planning & Scheduling Department will study the two alternatives and proceed with the necessary schedule revisions. Tentatively, we plan to implement the route change on September 28, 1981, in conjunction with our periodic driver choices. Scheduling con- straints which we must abide by in concert with our union contract dictate that the change cannot be made any sooner than the September date. Should you have any questions or wish further information, please feel free to contact me at 221-0939. Sincerely yours, f- C. R. 4 Scott R. Dickson Assistant Director Service Planning & Scheduling SRD/kal cc: Lou Olsen, MTC Gayle Kincannon, Commissioner -16MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre , Administrative Assistant RE: Levy for MTC DATE: July 28, 1981 I spoke with Gayle Kincannon regarding the possibility of removing Shakopee from the MTC Special Taxing District. It would require special legislation. As the law currently reads , Shakopee would immediately lose all MTC service if such legislation were passed. Ms . Kincannon has lobbied for a second levy for areas which receive second level service (such as Shakopee) , but has not had support of other Commissioners , especially the current chairman. If Shakopee seeks special legislation to be removed from the MTC taxing district it is unlikely to take effect until 1983 . (The legislature won ' t meet until January 82 and County sets the levy in October 81 for 1982) . JA/jam ( CJ MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre, Administrative Assistant RE: Report on Dishwasher at Highrise DATE: July 27, 1981 Introduction As previously discussed, the dishwasher at the highrise has not been working properly. This memo is an update of activities which have occurred since the last discussion. Background 1 . The management sent a new letter indicating that the hot water system for the building is working adequately and if hotter water is desired for the dishwasher, it should be handled by the City. (See attached letter) . 2 . The local service representative for the dishwasher manufacturer has been out twice to test the machine . a. On the first visit the thermostat was recalibrated to reach a higher temperature and the water Pres- sure was reduced, providing for reduced flow of water through the system. The system improved greatly af- ter this visit, but was still not judged optimal , so a second inspection was arranged. b. On the second visit it was determined that the water pressure had crept up in the 12 weeks since the last inspection, which would reduce the effectiveness . The service man recommended installation of a pres- sure regulator to stop the upward movement in pressure. 3 . The possibility of installing a water pressure regulator was explored. This device was added to a similar machine operated in the Belle Plaine Congregate Dining Center and the machine performance improved significantly. It is estimated that the cost of installing a pressure regu- lator would be approximately $180. Requested Action Authorize staff to secure two quotes for the installation of a pressure regulator to the dishwasher at the Senior Multipurpose Center and contract for the work to be performed at a cost not to exceed $200. Attachment JA/jam Sovell Management Company 312 Central Ave., Suite 367 • Minneapolis, MN 55414 • Phone (612) 379-7870 GERALD L. SOVEL.L CERTIFIED PROPERTY MANAGER PRESIDENT July 17 , 1981 j U.L 201981 Shannon Slagler, R.D. 44Ca Scott-Carver Economic Council Inc. ive 6th and Oak Carver, MN 55315 Dear Shannon: Thank you for your cooperation in monitoring the dishwasher in the congregate dining area of 200 Levee Drive. As previously noted, your correspondence was forwarded to TAC Engineering. Their response to the inquiry is enclosed. `The building water heaters are functioning according to the specs and heats the building water adequately. The water temperature in the IrrAl building cannot be turned up any higher or the tenants in the building would be scalded. Having talked with St. Paul Bar and Restaurant and the vendor for the dishwasher, there seems to be several options, one of which, will surely solve the problem of the inadequate water temperature in the dishwasher. Hopefully, the City of Shakopee who ordered the equipment for the congregate dining kitchen and the nutrition center will be able to work together in this matter and resolve the problem. Feel free to contact me should you have any questions regarding this letter. Very truly yours, Gaile L. Sovell GLS:ks CC: John LeRoux Jean Andre Ruth Gronneberg Levina Brusacker Barb Malloy • • TAC engineering co., inc. consulting engineers 620 Mendelssohn Avenue,Suite 161 /At Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 612-542-8855 June 22 , 1981 Mr . Vic Zeuthen Arvid Elness Architects 838 Butler Square 100 North Sixth Minneapolis , MN 55403 Re : 200 Levee Drive Domestic Hot Water Dear Vic : There continues to be some lack of information on what problems exist on this project . The installing plumber returned to the job site last week and could find nothing wrong with the delivered water temp- erature ( 140° ) or any complaint from the tenants or resident manager . It appears that either Mr . Slagle expects temperatures in excess of 140° , which is not consistent with HUD design criteria nor safe for the resident ' s baths , or there is some inconsistency only in the delivered temperatures that are apparent for minimal periods . There is a possibility that the recirculating system is presently unbalanced but this would only delay the delivery of 140° water for a very short period . It will probably be necessary to arrange for all concerned parties to meet at the site to first determine what and if a problem exists and then to resolve it on the spot . Gary Mitsch will attempt to arrange such a meeting at an early date . - 4a5--, 3 3 f4 The plumbing foreman also could find no problem with the flushing action of the public water closets despite an "out of order" sign by management . This too should be on the agenda of the on site meeting . Very truly yours , • TAC ENGINEERING CO . , INC . i -- Philip L . Anderson PLA/fp cc : John Bergstad Gary Mitsch Jerry Sovell TO: John Anderson FROM: Lou Van Hout DATE: July 23, 1981 RE: Limits on Change Orders and Quantity changes w/o prior approval by City Council This memo is written at the request by Council to explain this problem. Under the guidelines approved by Council and listed in your memo dated July 2, 1981 (Copy Attached) we are presently in a position on the Well #6 project where there is no flexibility left due to the fact that the change order #1 (for blasting) has eaten up all of the 5% limit before construction has started. Well #6 Original Contract $74,615.00 1% individual change order limit 746.15 5% overall limit, change order & quantities 3,730.75 Currently: Change order #1 $3,993 .04 (App'd /CC) Total C. O. 's 3,993.04 Balance remaining for change orders and quantity changes $ 0.00 Recommendations: That Council raise the overall limit to 5% above what costs are already approved. $ 74,615.00 Original Contract 3,993.04 C,O. #1 $ 78,608.04 Present Authorized Amount 5% of $78,608.04 is $3,930.40 ._.,.- /0/ ..� MEMO TO : Mayor and Council FROM: John K . Anderson RE: Change Order Administrative Procedures DATE: July 2 , 1981 Introduction In early April City Council implemented a new policy on the Administration of Change Orders beginning with the VIP San- itary Sewer Project . Council has asked that the policy be re- viewed now that we have had some experience with three projects . Background In the City Engineer ' s Original memo dated April 10, 1981 , he outlined a number of considerations and potential adminis- trative procedures . Council came to a consensus that each pro- ject ' s Change Order guideline would be established individually and that in most instances the following guidelines would be used: 1 . Individual Change Orders and/or quantity changes of less than 1% could be made by the project administrator (Bo or Lou) with the concurrance of the City Admini- strator and then reported to City Council at its next meeting. 2 . Change Orders and/or quanity changes in excess of 1% required prior Council approval . Major Change Orders that effect the project ' s original design concepts , etc . also required prior Council approval . 3 . When project Change Orders of type 1 and 2 above exceed 5% of the project costs in aggregate , all must be brought to Council for review and a decision on how to handle future project Change Orders . Two other concerns were discussed at the April meeting: (1 ) Emergency Situations . Council decided to stick with guidelines #1 , #2 , and #3 above and call a special meet- ing to handle situations #2 or #3 if required . (2) Small Contracts . Council decided that it would pro- bably set a fixed number in excess of the 1% and 5% in guidelines #1 and #3 above . ;toF H��rr�,�f CITY OFSHAKOPEE � yeti 6 ff 129 East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 �J? \ L. MEMO TO: John Anderson, City Administrator FROM: LeRoy Houser, Building Official SUBJECT: J . I . Case Permit DATE: July 6, 1981 Introduction: J . I . Case has been given a stop work order because their building permit hadn' t been processed and the final plat signed. Background: Eldon has asked if the reason they started to work before their permit was approved was caused by slow process at City Hall . I checked with Don and Phyllis and learned the follcwing. 1 . The' contractor for J . I . Case did check with Phyllis on the status of the permit . The first time Phyllis told him it needed signing by the Engineer and the second time she said it was ready but that Case hadn' t submitted the material to meet the conditions and could not release the permit until the conditions were met. 2. The contractor called Case and then called Phyllis and said the material was in the mail . It arrived the day we issued the stop work order. At no time did the contractor say he was gcing to start work or urgently needed to start work. At no time did J . I . Case call us and ask us to expedite the processing. 3. The packet that arrived the day the stop work order was issued included the Developers Agreement, executed by J . I . Case, but with several sections deleted. They had not consulted the City and the City Attorney won' t approve the final plat until the Developers Agreement problem is corrected. 4. In summary, the morning of the stop work order we hadn' t received the building permit check or the executed Developers Agreement . On balance staff believes that any delays we may have had in finalizing the plat did not contribute to the problem and that Case should pay the standard double permit fee. Alternative : 1 . Negate double permit fee 2. Comply with Code and assess double fee. The spin off of Alternative #1 is we could be faced with returning the double fees we have collected in the past. LFH:plk LALCO BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. • 8401 WAYZATA BOULEVARD • MPLS., MN. 55426 • (612) 544-1596 CBUTLE I m _ / July 20, 1981 �P City of Shakopee RECEIVED 121 E. 1st St. �1 Shakopee, Minn. JUL 2 1 1981 Attn: John Andersen, City Administrator Ref: Stop Order dated 6/23/81 J. I. Case Project CITY OF SHAKOPEE Dear Mr. Andersen: Under separate cover we have paid the $2,632.00 fine imposed by the City for starting excavation prior to the permit being issued. We feel that there are definitely mitigating circumstances relative to our "breaking the rules" and we hereby request that our fine be rescinded or at least reduced. Balco Building Systems, Inc. is the local general contractor on the project, however, the drawings and coordination for the permit was done by an out of state cbnstruction management firm, Brant Construction of Griffith, Indiana . Brant notified us a check had been mailed for the permit, we called Shakopee and were notified that everything appeared to be all set. At this point, we notified Dependable to start the excavating as we thought we would have the permit in hand. The next day we were informed by Shakopee that the permit drawings , etc. were approved but there was a problem with the plat. At this point we should have had the excavator pull off the job, however, we once again thought we would have the permit by the next day. The following day Mr. LeRoy Hauser issued the stop order and we were subsequently notified of the fine. We are guilty of telling our excavator to start work without the permit in hand. However, it was our understanding that everything had been done properly and the issuance of the permit was imminent. We view this as a communication problem and not as an overt breaking of the rules . Your presenting this to the City Council for their consideration is hereby requested. Sincerely, BALCO BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. JD/PP cc: LeRoy Hauser `: ;, ,Q James D. Donicht, f President ■ 6ocir MEMO TO: Mayor and Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: SAC 'Charges for Hauer Addition Sewer Service Connections DATE: July 30, 1981 Introduction At the July 21 , 1981 Council meeting I mentioned that staff had determined that the Hauer Addition homes currently being con- nected to the new Hauer Lateral Sewer should pay SAC charges . This decision was based upon the findings that the SAC charges , except for those noted on the attached map, had not been paid by the Citywhen we paid approximately $26,000 in overdue SAC charges earlier this spring. Eldon Rienke then asked staff to check the minutes of the first Public Hearing of the Hauer Lateral Improve- ments, because he recalled that the residents were told that they wouldn ' t have to pay SAC charges . Findings The minutes of the Public Hearing have been transcribed and are attached. It is clear from the minutes and listening to the tape that Bill Price and Councilman Rienke said there would be no SAC charge. I also contacted Bill Price and Doug Reeder re- garding this matter and both of them could not recall (or believe) that the City would have exempted the improvement area residents from the SAC charge . In fact, both recalled that the city was discussing its own "connection charge" at the time and wondered if the "connection charge" being considered hadn ' t been what they said would be exempted. The minutes are clear that various "con- nection charges" were discussed, but that SAC charges were men- tioned specifically. Conclusion I have spoken with the City Attorney about the above mentioned findings and he feels that we have a real problem if SAC charges were specifically mentioned. It is his feelings that public hear- ings are the the purpose of discussing matters just as this and that if we clearly stated "SAC charges are exempt", rather than the more general, "connection charges are exempt" then we ' ll have to live with it . Summary There is no doubt that the City will have to pay the SAC charges (note new monthly reporting form attached to Phyllis ' s memo with a column headed "Sewer Connection Permit SAC Units") . This will amount to roughly $10,625 (25 homes x $425 SAC) that will have to be paid by the Sewer Fund. SAC Charges for Hauer Addition /( July 30, 1981 Page 2 Alternatives Pay the SAC charges from the Sewer Fund or charge the resi- dents with the potential that they can make a case against such a charge if it is appealed. Action Requested Motion directing staff to pay the SAC charges due from the Hauer Lateral Sewer Service Connection from the Sewer Fund. Attachment JKA/jam Nof Sec . 8-115-22 (Hauer Laterals ) Sanitary o Sewer 80-1 C �} ms's` U 1 1 do 1I / ; / \ I '" 1 i o 1 / : Assessable Area C) 'q;1 j / ,, 1,.. \ l i .1;11... ,./ .. f T§r. (.-) \ 34 Q �rV I L .'::::.''--- \ . • I \ •••• ••• ••••;".••••••••••• •,'....,••••••••,. .......... ........, ........ ...... .. CEM. \.•'.\ `.♦ '``''': • ••'•``• I 1 _ _i 1 • r s �\ - - R O ' pass — 1 �o .�� ti I \\\ \•\ \\ \ Joe Theis: What is the hook up charge? Eldon Rienke : The Hauer project will not have one because of a, basically many of the houses in this area the grandfather made without any sewer availibility charges. Bill Price : Maybe this is something the rest of the people are not aware of. Eldon: A good example of this is in 1977 , the cost was $375 per lot . Now it is a little over $500 per availibility of the facility of the Bill : If the house is already there you don' t need one . Eldon: This particular area now will not have to pay that SAC Charge . Bill : If the house is already there , you won ' t have to pay the charge . It ' s a charge that is paid at the time you pull a building permit to build the house . So a vacant lot will have to pay i t . Eldon: That is basically the thing that was brought up . That is a $500 payable . That anybody else building or getting a building permit today and building a new home would have to pay. A comment was made by Joe Theis . Not understandable . Eldon: We are also discussing the reconstruction project for the city of ? That in order to fund such a program that in the future as not only would an individual get an building permit applica, sewer availibility charge for federal sewers facilities, but also for the maintenance and reconstruction of its own process in the city. In that another hook up charge would also be charged at this time . A question was asked by Joe Theis. It was not understandable . Eldon: Those are the other options that we are looking at that I was referring to so that there would be at a later date be another fee besides the original $500 that we are not looking at this time and so that is another statement made at this _���, N,r4.rfy CITY OF SHAKOPEE • ,457 ./u �p a �_40 u 129East First Avenue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 �j u.o ,. is ) +� .....,:.. .0 MEMO TO: John Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Phyllis Knudsen. Bldg. Secretary SUBJECT: SAC Charges/ MWCC DATE: July 21 . 1981 Introduction: As you requested, I will try and explain what cur responsibility to the MWCC is on SAC charges for existing houses and what we have done in the past ie. Bluff Ave. for example . Background: Each month a report is sent to the MWCC listing the number of permits issued within that month that a SAC charge was collected on. In January of 1981 the MWCC sent new forms with a new category entitled "SEWER CONNECTION PERMIT" . This means that whenever a house that was not on sewer before but is now hooking up to sewer must be listed on this form and charged the $425.00 SAC unit charge . When the Bluff Ave. project was put in I collected the SAC charge on the Plumbing Permit and we just paid the fee to MWCC but didn' t list the number of Sewer Connection Only on any form of any kind. • The Hauer Project I would think should be treated the same way as Bluff in that the people hooking up should have to pay and duly recorded cn this new form -- unless you have found the conversation on the tape of the Public Hearing prior to the Hauer Assessment. MWCC—73 RESERVE CAPACITY CHARGE 6 MONTHLY REPORT Municipality • —_ – '4. to: Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Month of 350 Metro Square Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 SEWER r BUILD G CONNECTION sTAL UNIT ITEM TYPE OF UNIT PER IT PERMIT SAS UNITS CHARGE RESERVE CAPACITY SAC NITS SAC UNITS CHARGES A Single Family House (Per attached Form MWCC-75D) $425.00 Duplexes (Ea. Housing Unit = 1 Sac Unit) $425.00 (Per attached Form MWCC-75D) Townhouses (Ea. Housing Unit = 1 Sac Unit) $425.00 (Per attached Form MWCC-75D) B Apartments (Ea. Housing Unit = $340.00 1 Sac Unit) (Per attached Form MWCC-75D) C Public Housing 1. Single Family $318.75 (Per attached Form MWCC-75D) 2. Duplexes (Ea. Housing Unit = --_ --- -- ---_-- --- ----� 1 Sac Unt) $318.75 (Per attached Form MWCC-75D) 3.Townhouses(Ea. Housing Unit = $318.75 1 Sac Unit) (Per attached Form MWCC-75D) 4. Apartments (Ea. Housing Unit = 1 Sac Unit) $255.00 (Per attached Form MWCC-75D) D Commercial&Institutional (Per attached Form MWCC—75A) $425.00 E Industrial (Per attached Form MWCC-75B- 1 &2) $425.00 F Demolition Credit (Per attached Form MWCC-75C- 1) Sib-Total— Reserve Capacity Charges $ • Administrative Fee (1% of sub-total) Subtract $ ( Net Amount Due $ CERTIFICATION I certify that the above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and represents the activities for the month indicated above. Name_ White copy—Return to MWCC Dots Title Yellow copy—Municipality copy 7 /' MEMO TO : Mayor and Council FROM: John K. Anderson RE: Link Variance Appeal (Project at CR #17 and 10th Ave . ) DATE: July 31 , 1981 Introduction City Council , at its July 21 , 1981 meeting, received a petition from residents in the area of CR #17 and 10th Avenue , appealing the Planning Commission ' s decision to grant the variance . City Council set the hearing for the appeal at 8 :00 p.m. , August 4, 1981 . Background Attached for Council ' s information are : 1) copies of the request (map) 2) copies of the City Planner' s staff memo to Planning Com- mission 3) copies of the petition from residents 4) excerpts from the minutes of the Planning Commission ' s Public Hearing, and 5) Variance Resolution No . CC-279 . The purpose of this memo is to address the specific concerns in the residents petition as numbered 1-5 . 1 . No traffic study was made or considered necessary. The reason for this was that the area in question was zoned R-4 (Residential Multiple) in the Comprehensive Plan and the Plan was reviewed by Jack Anderson a traffic engineer. The purpose of this review was to determine the impact the zoning would have on traffic patterns and traffic flow. Since there is no change in the zoning, or density per- mitted in the R-4 zone , there would be no change in the anticipated traffic patterns or flow that were originally reviewed by Jack Anderson. The location of the driveway on 10th Avenue is in compliance with our policy to not grant driveway cuts or minimize them on CR #17 . 2 . Within the R-4 Zone , 12 2-bedroom units would require 36,000 square feet of land area (Section 11 . 28, Subd. 5B- Pg. 308) . The property in question contains almost one acre of land (43 ,340 square feet) . Therefore , according to the Zoning Ordinance , the developer is not intending to build more units than the size of the parcel will accom- modate . 3 . There is no city policy requiring sidewalk on both sides of a street that is designated as an arterial . Thus the sidewalk on the west side of CR #17 complies with city policy. This does not preclude the requiring of additional sidewalk if it is warrented. Tenth Avenue is designated as a residential street which does not require any sidewalk. Link Variance Appeal 7 'Z—' July al , 1981 Page 2 4. The City will require the proper drainage and utility easements prior to approval of the building permit. The current standard is ten feet, but this will vary depend- ing upon the drainage requirements , etc. The easement requirements may then effect the final location of the garages on the site . 5 . The decision on the variances was not made prior to the public hearing. Because the decision was not in favor of those citizens opposed to the development , this does not indicate that the citizens , or the neighborhood, were not considered. Within the R-4 Zone , any type of multiple- family housing is allowed: apartments , townhouses , con- dominiums , highrise structure , etc . (Section 11 .28, Subd. 2 and 3 - pg. 307) . When Chairman Schmitt indicated to the citizens that these other uses could be located on the site he was merely explaining high density residential develop- ment is the inevitable use of the land due to its R-4 (Multi-family Residential) Zoning. Summary The action of Planning Commission was based upon the Compre- hensive Plan and the zoning for the area in question. There have been no points put forward nor did staff find any in review of the application, that indicate that the basic intent of the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning were being changed by the granting of the set: back requirements . Action Requested Action on Variance Resolution No. CC-279 A/ Q/%1 REQUEST IS FOR: .A' 5 foot variance from front yard setback requirements 1 off of 10th Avenue JUN, 1 C19(31 8 foot variance from front yard setback requirements off of County Road 17 12 foot variance from rear yard setback requirements .R �tf� [:.t1 G - gc..4 �' lFt6 L.01- c,:RP n- �3� tt 1. _ _ f ' . y em L• - _ 1 i • _ , y r "3 t - I 1 A -. ` /\ i � f 1 t.11�, \ 1 t 0e) .4. ' ,� 1 4- X t \ ,�; \ .. . \ .. ' .-- ••r(5N\\\ . -;k746-7' ' --- I'D i;-< � \ , 1- --, ,.... 1� � +& t. 1. ALt I vi, A _l_ 30' - 16,1451 _ - -'►�- G7: • _ ''''' - 3- 4• pLEXE6 n1-0T,AL UNIT S1 1? ON GAR GIARrs _ 17, ADD►Th !4 N _6,,t1 rE ' (SIG- STR LLS" SJ14LL= / '!o?t r Oft OPP (] ) DATE: July 9, '1981 CASE: PC 81-16V ITEM: Two Frontyard Variances and Rearyard Variance APPLICANT: Cletus Link LOCATION: NE Intersection of 10th Avenue and CR 17 ZONING: R-4, Multiple Family Residential LAND USE: Vacant APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 11.04, Subd. 5; Section 11.28, Subd. 5B FINDINGS REQUIRED: Section 11.04, Subd. 5A PUBLIC HEARING HELD CASE HEARD BY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL Proposal: The applicant is requesting approval of a 5 foot frontyard setback variance off of 10th Avenue, an 8 foot frontyard setback variance off of County Road 17 and a 12 foot rearyard setback variance from the north property line in order to construct a 12-unit condominium project at the above location. Considerations: 1. The applicant desires to construct three 4-plex buildings containing a total of 12 condominium units. The land consists of an irregularly shaped parcel of property of almost one acre in size. 2. Because the property is located at the intersection of two principal arterials (10th Avenue and County Road 17) , the Zoning Ordinance requires a 50 foot frontyard setback from both streets. However, because of a provision in the Zoning Ordinance which allows frontyard setbacks to be reduced to comply with existing adjoining structures, the frontyard set- back along 10th Avenue can be administratively reduced to 30 feet. The variance request along 10th Avenue is, therefore, only for 5 feet (from 30' to 25' ). .3. The rearyard setback requirement in the R-4 zone is 40 feet. The variance request if for a 12 foot variance from the north property line (from 40' to 28' ). 4. The frontyard variance request off of 10th Avenue would not be detrimental to the adjoining residence, as the house located immediately to the east is only 20 feet from its front property line. The proposed 4-plex and garages would be 25 feet from the front property line. In addition, the frontyard variance along 10th Avenue would not cause a line-of-sight problem at the intersection of 10th Avenue and County Road 17. PC 81-16V 411 July 9, 1981 Link VariancesP age -2- 7 a. 5. The frontyard variance request from County Road 17 would not cause traffic problem or line-of-sight problem along the county road or at its intersection with 10th Avenue. The apartment building located north of this site (at the intersection of County Road 17 and Shakopee Avenue) is considerably closer to the county road than the proposed 4-plex buildings and no apparent problem has resulted. In addition, the Scott County Highway Department has no objections to the variance request. 6. The rearyard variance request is not expected to cause problems for two reasons: 1) no buildings adjoin the north property line of this site, except for the church, which is located a considerable distance from the property line; 2) the proposed detached garages may be located 5 feet from the property line which is considerable closer than the 28 foot setback franthe 4-plex. 7. All other site design and Zoning Ordinance requirements can be met. Staff feels that the layout is well-designed and of a high quality. 8. Because of the irregular shape of the property, a functional and attractive layout becomes exceedingly difficult to maintain without variances. With no anticipated negative effects on adjoining property, it appears that the layout of the proposed condominiums and garages would be the most practical. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of Variance Resolution No. 279, granting a 5 foot variance from the frontyard setback requirement off of 10th Avenue, an 8 foot variance from the frontyard setback requirement off of County Road 17, and a 12 foot variance from the rearyard setback requirement off the north property line in order to construct three four -•-plexes and associated detached garages. Board of Adjustments and Appeals Action: Approved subject to easement along easterly property line be determined and satisfied. DS/j iw Attachment: Site Plan _ 4111 7 410 July 15, 1981 4' U y"R.Y i •...r.�Q14 Yi r1Vf City Council JUL 6 1981 Shakopee, MN CITY OF vHAKCP E On July 9 , 1981, the Planning Commission of Shakopee granted three easements on a parcel of property owned by Kermit Lindemeyer on the Northeast corner of 10th Street and Marshall The easement permits the building of twelve Condominiums on the property by Link Builders. A number of interested neighbors attended the meeting. We feel our concerns were not considered. We were not given adequate information and our questions were not answered . We request the City Council to review this Planning Commission decision and not allow the easements. Among our concerns on this project are the following: No traffic impact study has been made. This is a very busy four- way stop corner. It is a heavy pedestrian corner serving Elementary and Junior High School students. The addition of twelve families with their automobiles , utility and service vehicles on a congested piece of property could create an unsafe condition. We feel the builder/developer wants to build more units than the size of the parcel will accommodate. The fact they are asking for approximately 5, 000 square feet of variances indicates an effort to over populate the piece. There was no mention made of public sidewalk along Marshall Road, the properties west side. No consideration had been given to a drainage and utilities easement on the east side of the parcel . The lots adjoining to the east have easements for this purpose. Because it was obvious the decision on this property was made before the public hearing began, we feel there was no consideration given to the impact of this development on the neighborhood. Our questions were never satisfactorly answered. We were told to accept this or we could end up with something less suitable - such as a high rise or rental property. We see this as intimidation. For these and other reasons , we request that this variance not be granted and that any development of this property be done without set back variances . Respectfully, ► 7 q,3 Signatures for the attached letter addressed to the City Council of Shakopee NAME ADDRESS 'A a /Le--- -1--&:+2--- ' --',2.2)9 17/1 V Jl,e3:-<_ewt-e._ 1 , SE-6-4-01 ,z7 / .?-42e1.1iti o(15.- 05;4 0% ,:c mLam, / -57,7 -i-A, 6C7j ,(F' C /09""k 24. h� , 7 --I... 75-7_41,4_ 7,'��� .,,, , , i� 7.32 4 - ,s(::,____:.zt__,_ . c1-7_, f.'9) 7 , -(-1-6-e/7___ ,,/1. •AfiePaxiiiVe, 6)('Jb-i-id 91f .4e4, . 4,'"' / i /. , . •z '. ,.„.„ ( (" ,_ 4 *- .* - 7) (- (/. (/‘:0„ ;„ ,,,' ( I . / 7 / ' / II ?GC/ PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS ANL APPEALS REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, t,INNESOTA JULY 9, 1981 Chrm. Schmitt called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.N. with Comm. Coller, Stoltzman, Perusich and Vierling present, Comm. Koehnen arrived at 7:40; Comm. Rockne was absent. Also present were Don Steger, City Planner; John Leroux, Council Liaison and John K. Anderson, City Admr. Perusich/Vierling moved to approve the minutes of June 11, 1981 as kept. notion carried with Coller abstaining. PUBLIC HEARING - Link Variance Request (PC 81-16V) Coller/Vierling moved to open the public hearing on the applications for three vari- ances for the construction of a 12-unit condominium project at Co. Rd. 17 and 10th Avenue. Motion carried unanimously. The City Planner explained that the applicant is Cletus Link, who is requesting ap- proval of a 5 foot frontyard setback variance off of 10th Ave. , an 8 foot frontyard setback variance off of Co. Rd. 17 and a 12 foot rearyazd setback variance from the north property line, in order to construct three 4-plex buildings containing a total of 12 condominium units. Chrm. Schmitt asked for comments from the audience. Carl Gantriis, 937 Sibley Street, Shakopee, stated he is concerned with putting the building so close to the intersection because of the safety factor which would be caused by the line-of-sight at this heavy intersection. Chrm. Schmitt explained that the proposed buil:ing would be farther back from the street than the existing buildings in the area. Jerome Colling, 952 Sibley Street, asked when that block was zoned R4. Chrm, Schmitt answered that it has been zoned that way for at least 8-10 years. hr. Coiling was concerned about how close the proposed buildings would be ,to his property. Discussion ensued regarding whether or not there was a utility easement on the property. Fran Vohnoutka stated that his home is on 10th Avenue, and he has an 8 foot utility easement on his property, so thought there should be a 16 foot easement. Kermit Lindmeyer stated that he was the owner of the property before Clete Link, and stated it was platted as an outlot of Scenic Heights 1st Add'n, and there is no ease- ment. Fred Engfer, 960 Sibley, asked for a definition of R4 zoning. Chrm. Schmitt stated that dwellings of more than 2 families per structure. The City Planner stated that minimum square footage was determined by the number and size of bedrooms. m. Engfer was concerned with the number of people in that small area. The City Planner stated the square footage of the property is sufficient for 12 units. It is because the shape is so irregular that the variances are needed; it makes it difficult to lay out the units. Sandra Gantriis, 937 Sibley, stated she is concerned about the entrances an exits to the units, as this is a very busy intersection with many children walking. Chrm. Schmitt answered that the driveways are more than 100 feet from the intersection. board of Adjustments and Appals July 9, 1981 Page 2 Comm. Coller stated that with this R4 zoning, the property could contain this density in a highrise or other less desirable building. He stated that as far as utilization of this property, , he thought this proposal was well planned. Chrm. Schmitt added that what is being planned for the property is private ownership, rather than non-resident ownership of rental property. Comm. Koehnen inquired whether any conditions or stipulations were put on the outlot at the time of platting. Kermit Lindmeyer answered there were none. Fred Engfer asked who was responsible for the condominium upkeep. Clete Link answered there will be a Homeowners Assoc. Fran Vohnoutka asked about the design of the buildings, and Clete Link answered they would be two-story condominiums. Chrm. Schmitt asked for any other comments from the audience, and there were none. Coller/Perusich moved to close the public hearing. notion carried unanimously. Coller/Stoltzman offered Variance Resolution No. 279, granting a 5 foot variance from the frontyard setback requirement off of 10th Avenue, an 8 foot variance from the frontyard setback requirement off of Co. Rd. 17, and a 12 foot variance from the rear yard setback requirement off the north property line in order to construct three 4- plexes and associat?d detached garages, northeast of the intersection of 10th Avenue and Co. Rd. 17, and moved its adoption, contingent upon a satisfactory easement arrange- ment being worked out with the SPUC and City Engineer. Fran Vohnoutka asked about the law on easements, if he can us:. the easement for access to his own property. Chim. Schmitt stated the easement is for the exclusive use of the utilities or drainage activities. Motion carried with Comm. Koehnen abstaining because she did not have full participa- tion in the discussion. Chrm. Schmitt informed the audience that there is a 7 day appeal period, during which time anyone can file an appeal and have the issues heard by the City Council. REVIEW - eiinnesota Renaissance Festival Variance Request The City Planner stated this request is for a variance from the sign regulations to erect a temporary Port.-A-Panel sign during the months of August and September. This sign would be the same size and at the same location as in the past. Coller/Vierling offered Variance Resolution No. 257 for a variance from the sign regu- lations for Minnesota Renaissance Festival to erect a Port-A-Panel sign in August and September, and moved its adoption. The Commissioners gave their consensus that this could remain a review item as long as the conditions do not change. Jotion carried with Coller abstaining. Coller/Vierling moved to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8:10 P.M. John Schmitt Chairman Diane S. Beuch, Recording Secretary VARIANCE RESOLUTION No. CC-279 WHEREAS, CLETUS LINK , having first filed an application for an appeal to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals dated JUNE 10, 1981 , for a var;auee 1'r,,m the strict application of the provisions of the Shakopee Zoning Ordinaum to wit: 5 FOOT VARIANCE FROM FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OFF OF 10TH AVENUE; 8 FOOT VARIANCE FROM FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OFF OF COUNTY ROAD TVAND A 12 FOOT VARIANCE FROM REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS and; WHEREAS, the property upon which the request is being made is described as OUTLOT 1, SCENIC HEIGHTS 1ST ADDITION (AKA County Road 17 & 10th Avenue) and; WHEREAS, said proposed variance request, was _ Approved with condition by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals at their meeting of July 9. 1981 and this decision has been appealed to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Council on August 1+, 1981 held a public hearing on the appeal from the deci.:;i.on of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOP E, MINNESOTA, that upon hearing the advice and recommendations of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals and upon considering the suggestions made by the applicant and suggestions and objections raised by the affected property owners, within a radius of 350 feet thereof, in public he•irings duly held by the Shakopee Board of Adjustments and Appeals and the Shakopee City Council that the aforementioned variance be and is hereby: Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this ._ day of , 19 Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: A,Throved as to form this day City Clerk of i9 City Attorney • MEMO TO: John Anderson City Administrator FROM: Don Steger City Planner RE: Comprehensive Plan - Final Revisions DATE: July 28, 1981 On April 23, 1981, the Metropolitan Council approved the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan with revisions. Almost all of these revisions were discussed and approved by the City Council in the months preceding the Metropolitan Council's review, therefore, few revisions are new. Exceptions are the revisions on Pages 124+ and 131. The revision on Page 124, simply provides a statement of conformity with Metropolitan Council's guidelines. The City of Shakopee will be coordinating its on-site sewage system efforts with Scott County in the future, thereby providing uniformity. The revision on Page 131, indicates that airspace for Flying Cloud Airport will not be violated (minor effect on Shakopee) . The City of Shakopee has been involved in the preparation of an Airport Zoning Ordinance which will be considered by the Planning Commission in the future. The revision on Page 131, is simply an interim measure. At their July 23, 1981 meeting, the Shakopee Planning Commission approved the Comprehensive Plan with all the revisions indicated on the attached pages and recommended that the City Council adopt the revised Comprehensive Plan. Requested Action: City Council adopt the Comprehensive Plan with the indicated revision. DS1jiw Attachment MEMO TO: John K. Anderson , City Administrator FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk RE: STH 101 Watermain 80-11 DATE: July 30, 1981 Introduction The work on the above project has progressed sufficiently to commence the assessment process . Mr. Van Hout has informed me that Mr. Price , Consulting Engineer, is preparing the assess- ment roll . Background In order to assess the projects it is necessary to adopt a resolution certifying the amount of the assessment and to direct the City Clerk and Project Engineer to prepare assessment rolls for the project . Recommendation Adopt resolution number 1889, declaring the cost to be assessed ordering the preparation of proposed assessments and specifying the date of the public hearing. JSC/jam RESOLUTION NO. 1889 A Resolution Declaring The Cost To Be Assessed And Ordering The Preparation Of Proposed Assessment 80-11 (STH 101 Watermain) WHEREAS , a contract has been let for the improvement of STH 101 between the East line of Cretex Tndustrial Park 1st Addi- tion and the East line of Hall ' s 1st Addition by trunk watermain extension, and the contract price for such improvements is $172 , 568 .00 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvements is $43 , 548.00 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred for future trunk watermain improvements amounts to $12 , 647 .00 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $228,763 .00 and of this cost the City will pay -0- as its share . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA: 1 . The cost of such improvement to be specially assessed is hereby declared to be $228, 763 .00. 2 . The City Clerk, with the assistance of the Project Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot , piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3 . That the City Clerk shall , upon the completion of such proposed assessment , notify the City Council thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: 1 . That a hearing shall be held on the 1st day of Septem- ber, 1981 , in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 8: 30 PM to pass upon such porposed assessments and at such time and place all per- sons owning property affected by such improvements and proposed assessments will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment . 2 . That the City Clerk is hereby directed to cancel a no- tice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper of the City of Shakopee at least two • Resolution No. 1889 Page 2 - weeks prior to the hearing and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvements . He shall also cause mailed notice of such hearing to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. Adopted in adjourned regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 4th day of August , 1981 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1981 . City Attorney h MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne Andre, Administrative Assistant RE: Resolution No. 1887 DATE: July 20, 1981 A third amendment to the planning grant agreement (funding for Comprehensive Plan) providing for the 1980-81 allotment and allowing 50% payment upon acceptance of the Comprehensive Plan for review by the Metropolitan Council has now been drafted. The City Council must authorize execution of the amendment and request the initial payment by Resolution. Resolution No. 1887 has been drafted for this purpose. Recommended Action Adopt Resolution No. 1887 , A Resolution Authorizing Execu- tion of Amendment to Planning Assistance Grant and Requesting Payment of Grant Funds . JA/jam, RESOLUTION NO. 1887 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT TO PLANNING ASSISTANCE GRANT AND REQUESTING PAYMENT OF GRANT FUNDS WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council , hereinafter referred to as the "Council , " and the City of Shakopee , hereinafter referred to as the "City," have previously entered into a grant agreement for a local planning assistance grant , Metropolitan Council Contract No . 77109 , dated January 6, 1978, and amended on September 14, 1978, and on March 20, 1979 ; and WHEREAS, the Council has awarded $22 , 201 in 1980-81 grant fundsto the City from funds appropriated by Minnesota Laws 1979, Chapter 333 , Section 16, Subdivision 4, for the preparation of its comprehensive plan required by the Metropolitan Land Planning Act ; and WHEREAS , a third amendment to the Grant Agreement revises the total grant allotment and provides for payment to the City of $11 , 101 upon determination by the Council that the City' s plan is adequate for review; and WHEREAS, the City has submitted its plan and it was reviewed by the Council . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City council of the City of Shakopee that the Mayor is authorized to execute the third amendment to the planning assistance grant on behalf of the City of Shakopee AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Metropolitan Council be requested to make initial payment of the 1980-81 grant funds to the City of Shakopee in the amount of $11 ,101 . Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee , Minnesota , held this day of 1981 . Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form this day of , 1981 . City Attorney C 7 " i61 EAST MARIE AVENUE•SAINT PAUL,MINNESOTA 55'1'18•(6'12)455-2984 II I-•• C13 U1 H (n O H W rr a H rt W H UI rh ti 0 7:J Y Cn N C) C) C.r 0 gm 7 Z O 7 '•C til r r rr r• (D rt O 7 rt 0 r• G (D (D tri y 7 tv r• r• G m C I--H U1 C r• 0 C 7 Cu 7 - - 7 n W •• 3 W w rr r r 7 < 0 H t-'• (D rt t=i r• 0 G (D W n W G I-' r• W H Z 7a' 'C '•C CD m 'ri a C (D ti to G • 1-+ n I-, (n n rt . rt G •• o rxj r (D O W O (n O W H W r• r• Cn 3 0 1-1 W Z Ai G 0 b H ( W O 'C3 (D I-, O D 0 (D O tv D G 7 U) 9 n 7 rtn 7 rt Co tzi U) E (D oil H G rt tli to W r• r( W r• (D O rr 0 • 7• 0 Cr 7 0 W . r• I-, 0 D r• Z rt rt 7 n Ul 7 7 n to t-' n W to rh (D (D H H rt 0 H m 0 H (D r•• O r- n rt'r} p) 'Ly 0 0 rt Pi r• (1- X u) 7 0 CnZ7 (D (D 0W7C• 0 W1rr (n 4a rrt H o ./ C O' 7 rt (n rt X 'O n (o (D rt r• 7• •• 'C ]C G I..• rt 0 rr 1-3 (D 'Lf r• W W W 0 a (D E W o > > > O trir• O W 70 G W rtn rt E (-) rt (D E N (D (Wn 11 CT UO 0, Z Ii (D D ✓ M rt Crt 7 U) Ps-' r• (D r• r• W O (D (D C7 )-• a W 0 H rt 0 (D W C Oct (D 0 G n 'C H ri 4 -3 0 (D (n 4 G I-•'C 7 I-, UI (D 0 (D 0 rt G = • zC1 r•. 7 aG (D Orth < n' WO rzi G n . � a) 'C F• 0 0 G A, fa) C w "C7 (D (D H m el H a a 0 � A) u 0 u) rr (D I N '< 0 X (Un A z C 0 Cr a cn (D 0 PO 0 rrr 0) U) Cn a '• � a C C G-) (D W W > 7 rf, fr"-10 0 • 0 CC/1 'C (D 0 D 33 • 7 r• rt Z 0 G (D C (D (•) a H. (n n 1-1 (D 1-• r• C7rt G I-, rt r• Co m H n W 0 7- N 7 0 0, rt 0 I ' ((DD rr Z 44 O• 7 O (D n r• (D ht - (D W 't7 5 r• Z C)'C u) it) 0 7 7 O- < 0 • (D C=in 0 r : rtwW � ° � � � � m (0 n E :U O rt r( 1-3 7 I-( r• W (D a (D in r (o rt W• > 7 H oo C (D n (D CO H0 0 rtr30 'C a70 0 7• r• n () 7 ; � 7 0 I-' 7- t' M G G Z 0 (D 0 0 C a < , r• rt rt n x H G a G 7 (D In 0 (D a 7 (o ri 7 rt t=i n G n m Pi G rt 0 (D (D r• '-C Cn .3• I'4 a H. rt 2 N 'C E O I-' 7 0 : rt r- (D (D (n A! . 'I WG H. 0 n 7 (t G C G G al (0 'C to n CuCD 0 O n 'C rt (D W rtn D ci) ram rt u) (D NEO b0• � a' CO aa ((D D r• rr (D W rh W rt PO (D 'O n r• W z (D r• 4 (n 7 rt 7' W C b (D (D 5 N 0 7 1-•• rt rt '•C 7 (D 7 (D t•( ?-1 (n r• r• ? rt ()) n 0 (D 7 r• r• HO N D 5 ZZ I-'• r• 7 (D (D (/) a (D 0 C E H. H.t4 a 0 a 7 • r• D X to 'd r• r• G U) 7 (D n 7 n util- r• W 0. O 0 'Wt Cnr• (CD a = N'd "C (D -3 G 7 7 rt 4 rt 7 In W t.Q t'i r 0 0 W04 7• G r• (D G M rt I-h rS H H•(D 0 rt 7 W r• 7• N a HI W (D mal W r- 7 Co (D fD () w AI C 5 rt rr G C N C n rt A, (rn (1) r•'C W HHZC (D (D rtr• O O rt %D tl -- H. f•+ N (D I-• r-h a (n oro r- o1CJa0O aw rt rt W Ou:) Ell E (D b r• rt Cr rt I-11 (pp rt 0 . M (D N 0 r• r• 7 (D W 9 Al a Ul (D Cr to a (D H H rt W 7 Cr) 0 1-'- hi ~-- fD 4 r• • (D Co N 7' CD n to rt rW rt a • W '•C r• (n n E 7 • (D W rt 0 A) (n 0 G ()) rtW (D (D bnall 0- a0 'd rt NM'(Itt,aa 'i4C ° acnatu ° �• w (Dari M C O rt Or• 0OG Urhl-, 0 I-•O' (D ri t'J r• rt, HI 0 (D (D I-, 0 0 n ' (D n O r• 0 N U) . M y d / n nH ID0 I 1•1U (CDD b 7' O G • N O rt r• a 3 0 0 C Ell ›, 0 C Z a 7 0 7 r• H. (D O rt •1j rt (n (n (D - co C rt O m rh 7• HN rt 2 N Gn 7 '•C co I°t, n �, a n (D rt I-, fill G C 0rt, rtrtUl OWn _ h W • W a I I 0 co 1 m rn d 7 _ w ).) H To 5 5 H C) t) C-4C7•• 0 rt G a G H. (f) G u. 0' n kr.1 G rt (D > G C7 y Ort O ri sl Ca) CD (D 11) K G W to (D U) H rn To G ' _) C) (D To (). rr Cl) C7 (D cf) rt n n a G EG Ts-) 0 (Al rN• cn rU• OH nO (n O 2 - () (D ',Pe n(D a y cn n Clab C . G G 'C rt 5 rt > r• G n a n H I-+ I H. (D Uf H 0 ( a (D a To 0 H n H- H. U) 0 (1-1-0't r• O 1-4 F-+ 'p C) n rr 0 0 rt 0 Cl g rt a rt r• n H. G G H. H (D r• 0 H C OD (D 1-4 p 4 (D G C (D as n 0' 0- co H (D G CD G CI O n a (D LA As A 'C Cu (D a tr P) r- 0 (D H n rr To G To o• n m (D G 0 Hi•• H1 'G 'C r• a) (1) n O N 0' rt Cl 0 G rr H H< C < rr '0 n (D n H CD C r- (D G CD H CI r- r- (D r• r• 1100 a 0 'd rt b (ss (D rt (D rt Cr) G 0 n H 1-+ E H 0 5 X' Cr (D 0' a P) Co n a) To aD 1-i Ti) G rna HH a 1-' Cl H HZ CD o 0 n 'C n co n O Tf) rr 0 'L7 (D (D to H G rr To a (D 0 H Cl (D CD (D a 5 U) to 0• r• n a '. rt F•'• n 0' 0' U) 5 to C tr • < a H H. Dy H. (D (n Cr (D o m (D 0 - 0 a (D > G a N (D G t'' U) 'C r- Z X 0 Cu r• 0 G H H- 0 G H H. H • UCl a) H. rt r• 0 H r• H. H. N (n r- < < a (D P+ G rt G G Hi a H. G G r• 00 0u) G •• (D0) (D HIM 'C • To to to Z G co rt rr G 0 a •• to n As U) 0 n 4 X' rt 0 C) 0 'tJ as rt H- (D (D (D O rt r- U) H 'C To CO r• rt 0 H (D O n 0 (D (n Co Or• a s r• H •• a O (D (D Z (n (D U) 0 0 Cl) 1-r1 > G H •• rt H r• CO G G (D TO ri, a Cl) rt • rr rt (D O rn r- t-- H 'C r• (n H. rt Cl 7:10 H rt 0 Cu s in W O G 1-' '0 (D 0 H opi, H- > n aD G •• a n w r• t-' 0 H3 0 0 n G O a a '-3 O a n H r• (D To aD To 0~ rtn w (D n U) n H G H HC 1-ti • rt to G n rt 5 CL G a (D co O r- 'C Cl O0 H- n 0 a rt H •• O G Cl) rt 0 ZG 'C0 ETit 0 n3 (1) O X • W = H C (D rt Cr Ni Ni 0 r• (D n W a H. 0- a O X H (D n Cd (D (D > 0 G E 1-4 C n 'C '< n r• rt H a r• U) n a to To Z n n O H (D (D CD G aD r- U) G 0 (D rr (1)a rt Cl) d n 1-' G O N O (D N a 0 0 H Cl (D (D (a H- a U: 75' Cr O rt n s r- ,_; r• H- co r- C a Cr tj n O r• (D C) H p • (D r• Z rt H 0 r•'C Cl b H Ai rt ••o G 0 a H H tT) H- • r- c) - G a O (D U) to 0 O a H- ,U a s G tt) C) 'ti n : rt a n H 't7 '0 G rr G) co E U) aD cn as To (D CD co n (D • Cl K )-‹ E r• O a rt Cl) G n rt 1t; 0 rt (D rn n Ct as rt b • tr a r- H r• n CD 10 To G 0 0 ) CD To G' as rn r• U) rt O As G 1t7 G H (1- rt n Ni tri C rt n 0 4 G r• H. G G 0 0 r• N H. H. (") (D a) a H 0 I a O U) rt r• n 0 CD a 0 O aD As 0H • 0 rr r• 0- 'O r• G G a () G Hi H < 0 0 H- CG Ha U) To E (D rt r• r• E • CD Co tri'-‘0 n 0 - a n • G r• n r• G G a ct C) 'C :til (D G $ cn G 'C a H a 0 CD Cn 0' rt Cl) 'C n (D n a rt H rr G n a rt Cl) (D n rr I 0 rt N C • 0 5 H. 2 (D H• CD U) O E Cr rr G rt G Cr 0 ft N 0 to C) 5 'C E O 5 r• (D H. 0 0 a r• ACT (D O r- U) 0 G G co < 2 H• PI M 0 • 0 H rt H• '-3 (D H 0 H. (D 0 0 G (i) 0 0 rt (D H. 'C G n a r• > G n (D r• 'C n 0' X Cl rt G 0 W 0 10 To (n E a rt 'C • rt, aD W r• r• CD To (n rt rt r- E 0 0 O r- G G rt n H''0 CD C' rt G 'C7 TO G n rt r• C1 (D 'C a Cr 9 CD G- 0 H CO 'LS n Cr 0 rr n H E a r• r- CD it 0 (D rr aD a r• a H a n CD 0 Cl) CD rt As 0• n '0 a rt G HI) (Oct G 0 H- 0 n n 0 n 0 0 0 rt CO aD 'ti 0 r- CD A) roo an O rDr� 5 n a rr G rt a 0 a n C a Cr rt 4 H a) H. • (D O r• E E U) E H. Cr 'C rt H• 0) a C C a r- r• s H. G (D (n a Cr G H 0 (D r- r• H rt r rtka O n G (D (D a H As 0 H G" Cr H (D H CD Cl Cl) n aD 0 (D W Cr aD G r• 0 (D a ] E 'O O• m G rt CD As 0 H rt aD r- a s (D G H Cr n C G To O n H (D (D aD G (D LC) (D I H n W HG C n U) 'C n CD •• rt CD •• Y0 0 �0y Cl r) v 1 f 1 C7 C1 __ C (n b H H 01 to IA ro 4 n �' 0 ` 7 --fQ (D ' r• rh W G r• '10 ���4 '�{' ((DDCfl O0 /1 1-4 nro OfGD �C 7r f:1)-7.. 1rt 1 to (D O 1i I J rh CD 0< 1-1 0 w 111 0 N O . r ,E --, �c < 0 00 0 (D 0 'C0 11 11 0 1y(� < I-, w 7r a a () a 'o • co ►-•-. H*,-- G art E0 00 o as • � 1 ►� r• r• b 0 G (D rr �� (D 5 rt rt (D G rt N G'lC n 0 r• (On ,.< GN 0a O 0' a r• (D 0 r• of 01 (D b (D (D a rt G G 1-• (n (D C (D (n r• rt 0) M O E G• r• O (n rl 0 ro I-+ rt 1-'• 0 rt I-• (D (D rt b O rt C (n r• r1 (n (D 11 10 0' m a c O us r•'o rt b 0 O NOmGa (D 0- wa • 1^I G U) U1 I✓ 01 rt rt rt r• rh rt 0 0 0' 1-. a) HI a (D 0 rt m O 0 0 G 11 G 'o n O 1••• (n (n •• rt 0 N r• rt O 1-" 0 ',C 1••• rt 11 G G 0• O (D rt (D G n rr I-• G 11 I< • 0 m m • (n rt O n 5 O" G O 0 w G W G (n 0 'o a C rt 11 (D (n (D (n 11 O G 0 E r• r• (D H r• (D G b 1-3 a • 1.1 0 r 0.' (n rt rt 'o r• cu n (D 11 01 (n 0 O I-. N 2:1 r• '0 r• b G (° O rrr r CD • t11 ti 1 0 1-, r• 1-3 (D • rt G H 1.1 0 w w w Z rt • rn (D r• (D rt 0 '0 rt 0 G E 11 r• 11 r• 0 G (D G 11 G w G 0 W `1 11 G (D K t: :, I 0, I (D .,, t;fi3` ..,„.. 9 b '. .t' City of Shakopee ,0-.1-1-0--- ,,.,,,,,,,,,,.: tea>,, /r- K ° P POLICE DEPARTMENT , `' sN eF r G ,�.. \NNes°T rr )1 e- `C 1i � � b �� i _‘-'- i',./ 476 South Gorman Street � ,' -, i .t SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 p OTel. 445-6666 ;�� 1 G I (:r b •' "•', tj ' ' 55379 , TO: Mayor , Council Members FROM: Tom Brownell SUBJECT: Propane Dispensing Equipment DATE: July 30, 1981 INTRODUCTION The City currently has eight vehicles operating on propane fuel. The weekly rate of fuel consumption is approximately 550 gallons at a current cost of . 649 per gallon, plus 13 tax. Our fuel storage capacity is 1000 gallons, due to fuel expansion, fuel deliveries are received on a weekly basis. Under our lease agreement, the storage tank and pumping equipment were installed on City property for $1, 000 .00 with the provision that the fuel is purchased from the vendor at the current BPN price index. There are two obvious disadvantages to leasing a 1, 000 gallon storage tank. 1 . Fuel must be purchased from the vendor leasing the tank to the City. 2. The cost of the fuel per gallon is approximately 10higher due to the low storage capacity resulting in weekly de- liveries. ALTERNATIVE Purchase one 12, 000 gallon storage tank and dispensing equipment. ADVANTAGES 1. Fuel could be purchased on a seasonal basis on the open market when consumption by agricultural and home heating users are low. 2 . A 10 per gallon cost savings would be achieved if we had storage capacity to hold a tank truck load which elimi- nates transferring small amounts of fuel from the vendor ' s tank to a tank truck to our tank on a weekly basis. go cSE¢VE a, Jn-zoEEct - 2 - • COST OF PURCHASING STORAGE EQUIPMENT $15, 000 Current annual rate of consumption 28 , 600 gallons Current cost of propane fuel, 77. 9 $22, 279 Annual savings 12 ,000 gallon capacity $ 2 , 228 Pay back at current cost with eight vehicles 6 . 73 years RECOMMENDATION Purchase of one 12, 000 gallon propane storage tank and related dispensing equipment with a resolution stipulating users other than City Departments reimburse the City for a portion of the equipment cost to be determined at the time of participation. 1 �J MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Resolution No. 1890 (Amending 1981 Budget) DATE: July 29, 1981 Resolution No. 1890 is to amend the 1981 Budget to reflect the following items. 1. 1981 salaries previously set by Council 2. Change in planning department budget to allow for higher salary level of new planner. (previous Council action) 3. Change in engineering and inspection budgets to allow for purchase of lettering machine. (previous Council action) 4. Provide funding for replacement of air conditioner in west City Hall. (previous Council action) 5. Provide funding for purchase of computer terminal. (new item) Items 1-4 have already been before Council. Number 5 is a request by the Finance Department for authorization to purchase a new computer terminal. The present terminal is technologically obsolete. Logis cities are phasing into new terminals that have been evaluated and selected by Logis staff. Logis staff has also made arrangements for maintenance on the new terminals. Approximately half of Logis members have converted to the new terminals. The advantages are: current technology, improved productivity, maintenance will be avail- able, (maintenance on current terminal will be increasingly more difficult to obtain) some of the computer applications (i.e. fixed assets and text editing) are being designed for the new terminals with the "TV screen" format, reduce operating costs- based on current rates about a five-year payback. The new terminals are not available on a lease basis. The cost of the CRT Terminal with printer is $3,000. A new coupler is available which is four times faster at a cost of $900 or base at $40 per month. At this point I don't feel we need the new coupler. GV/ljw RESOLUTION NO. 1890 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 1706 ADOPTING THE 1981 BUDGET WHEREAS, the annual budget of the City of Shakopee for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 1981, has been formally adopted by Resolution No. 1706; and WHEREAS, the Shakopee City Council has adjusted employee compensation since the adoption of Resolution No. 1706; and WHEREAS, minor modification of the budget in several areas is deemed desirable; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SHAKOPEE CITY COUNCIL that the 1981 General Fund Budget be amended as follows: Division Adopted Appropriations Revised Appropriation Administration/Personal Services $ 63,815 $ 66,980 Finance/Personal Services 54,360 58,240 Planning/Personal Services 27,010 31,820 Gov't.Bldgs./Personal Services 9,650 17,125 Inspection/Personal Services 39,265 41,895 Engineering/Personal Services 96,900 106,066 Shop/Personal Services 22,766 24,430 Assessing/Personal Services 33,493 35,635 Police/Personal Services 439,020 489,845 Street/Personal Services , 126,015 139,669 Park/Personal Services 93,299 102,225 Subtotal 1,005,593 1,113,930 Contingency 159,381 52,244 Planning/Schools & Conferences 1,500 300 Inspection/General Supplies 500 200 Engineering/General Supplies 2,500 2,200 Engineering/Capital 2,000 2,600 Finance/Capital 650 3,650 Gov't.Bldgs./Capital 14,000 15,545 Administration/Reproduction 3,500 8,300 Mayor & Council/Reproduction 5,000 200 Revenue: Revenue Sharing Transfers $ 63,250 $ 67,795 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Revenue Sharing Fund Budget is amended to increase transfers to the General Fund by $4,545 in order to fund capital outlays of Finance Department and the Government Buildings division. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of , 1981. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk pproved as to form this day of , 1981. City Attorney - 9 d #11akepee Tumtuunit l #eruireg 129 Levee Drive Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone 445-2742 Community Education • Parks • Recreation • Adult Education George F. Muenchow, Dir. July 28, 19$1 John Anderson : Attached is our recommendation for a Park Usage Ordinance. Actually it is only a slight revision of the one that was on the books before being wiped out in the big revision two years ago. Tom Brownell has ok'd it. �) Gei e Fd. Muenchow Action Requested : Discuss and direct staff to prepare appropriate ordinance. A COOPERATIVE EFFORT OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE AND SCHOOL DISTRICT 720 SINCE 1954 ti CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA aL ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO AND REGULATING THE USE OF PARKS AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES The Council of the, City of Shakopee does ordain: Section I. Definition of "Parks". For the purposes of this ordinance "parks" shall mean a park, parkway, trail, playground, athletic field, swimming pool, recreation center, or other area in the City, owned, leased, or used, wholly or in part, by the City for such purposes that are normally associated with parks and recreation. Section 2. Activity Scheduling in Parks Shakopee' s parks are intended for the benefit of all of its citizenry. To facilitate maximum, uniform, and orderly usage of park facilities, the Shakopee Community Services Board is delegated the responsibility of coordinating the scheduling and usage of park areas and facilities as far as feasible in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. , Section Section 3. Regulations. The following regulations shall apply to all City parks: 1. Speed Laws - No person shall operate a motor vehicle in any park or driveway at a speed in excess of 15 miles per hour. 2. Parking - No person other than park personnel shall park any motor vehicle in any place in public parks excepting in designated areas, and no person shall operate any motor vehicle in any place excepting on established roads or driveways. 3. Hours - No person shall be or remain in any park between the hours of 10:00 p.m. an 6:00 a.m. excepting those who, without delay, are traveling through the parks on the established walks, paths, or streets, or are in activities that have been scheduled by the proper City authorities. 4. Camping - Overnight camping is permitted only in the areas designated for such activities. 5. Fire Building - No fires shall be lighted or made in the parks excepting in places and containers intended for such purposes. This section does not apply to City employees engaged in cleaning or maintaining an area. 6. Firearms & Fireworks - No person or persons shall discharge any fire- works or firearms in parks without first securing specific approval from the City Council and in the case of fireworks, a permit from the Fire Marshall; and in the case of firearms, a permit from the Chief of Police. 7. Littering - No person shall cast, deposit, throw, lay, place, or scatter any lighted or unlighted cigars or cigarettes, chewing gum, glass, bottles, cans, nails, wire, crockery or other sharp or cutting substances, or any refuse matter of any kind anywhere, excepting in refuse containers provided for this purpose. Charcoal coals and ashes shall be deposited only in containers designated for this purpose. Page 2 8. Swimming & Diving — Swimming & bathing will be permitted only in designated areas. 9. Dangerous Active Games — No person shall play any game of baseball, tackle football, golf or other games dangerous to the welfare of other citizens and property excepting in areas provided for this purpose. 10. Vandalism — No person shall write upon or mark or destroy or deface in any improper way any property or thing pertaining to or in said parks. No person shall paste or affix or inscribe any handbill or poster on any structure or property within the parks nor on any road or roadway adjacent to the same. No person shall break, cut, mutilate, injure, remove or carry away any tree, plant, flower, shrub, rock, soil, or any other park property excepting in the cases of City personnel engaged in the maintenance and development of City parks. 11. Control of Pets — No pets shall be allowed in any park except when they are under control on leash or in some other manner. No person shall ride a horse or other animal except on designated trails, paths, and areas. No one shall dis— turb or interfere with any wild life. 12. Sales — No person or persons other than City or Community Services personnel shall be permitted to sell any article or product without a permit granted by the Executive Committee of the Council. 13. Alcohic Beverages — No person shall possess, display, consume, or use intoxicating liquors while in a park. No person shall possess, display, consume or use non—intoxicating malt liquors excepting in picnic, grandstand and shelter areas. 14. Morals — No person shall commit any nuisance or any offense against decency or public morals. 15. Tennis Courts — No one shall ride on bicycles or other vehicles on tennis courts nor use these courts for any other purpose than playing tennis without specific permission from the Community Services Board. 16. Ice Skating Rinks — Ice hockey will only be permitted on rinks designated for hockey. No hockey sticks or pucks shall be allowed on any other park rink. No vehicles of any kind excepting those used by City personnel will be allowed on any skating area. Section 4. Penalty. Any person violating the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Passed in regular session of the Council of the City of Shakopee held this day of , 19 President of City Council ,attests Approved this day of City r '"..... Mayor of the City of Shakopeee (/ "C.'', 11 MEMO TO : May r and Council FROM: Johkh K. Anderson, City Administrator RE: Suburban Rate Authority DATE: July 27 , 1981 Introduction During one of several discussions with numerous people about the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission ' s (MWCC) excessive budget I learned about the Suburban Rate Authority. The purpose of the Authority is outlined in the Sample Agreement attached under "II GENERAL PURPOSE" on page one of the Agreement . Background The reason I gathered information on the Authority was because they were an organization with some success behind them and they were beginning to monitor the activities and budget of the MWCC. There are currently no dues required because of prior budget sur- pluses . Please read the "Joint and Cooperative Agreement" attached and pages 3 and 4 of a letter dated August 7 , 1981 from Clayton L. LeFevere to members of the Authority. Summary The Mayor and I have reviewed this and feel that there may be some value in belonging to the Authority. If Council , after read- ing the attached material , concurs then the attached Agreement can be approved now or at a subsequent meeting. It will mean another liaison meeting for a Council member or the City Administrator. Action Requested Approve the attached Joint and Cooperative Agreement for mem- bership in the Suburban Rate Authority, and authorize proper city officials to execute same . Enclosures JKA/jam LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLER, KENNEDY, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ 1100 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING CLAYTON L.LEFEVERE BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE HERBERT P. LEFLER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 103 BROOKLYN LAW CENTER J. DENNIS O'BRIEN JOHN E.DRAWZ TELEPHONE (612) 333-0543 5637 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD DAVID J. KENNEDY BROOKLYN CENTER,MINNESOTA 55429 JOHN B.DEAN June 30 , 1981 (612)536-8037 GLENN E.PURDUE CHARLES L.LEFEVERE RICHARD J.SCHIEFFER HERBERT P. LEFLER,III JEFFREY J. STRAND JAMES P O'MEARA MARY J. BJORKLUND7 THOMASD.CREIGHTON REC i`, • JOHNG.G. KRESSEL .1 Vogl yYti J DAYLE NOLAN CINDY L.LAVORATO kL 0 7 i9S1 Mr. John K. Anderson City Administrator CITY OF SHAK�DPEE City Of Shakopee City Hall 129 E. 1st Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Mr. Anderson: As requested recently, we are enclosing the same materials which were sent to the present members of the Suburban Rate Authority several months ago. I believe that they will provide you with as much of the background information you may desire about the activities of the SRA, particularly with regard to the MWCC . If Shakopee should desire to join the Suburban Rate Authority, I believe that it would be sufficient if the following steps were taken: (a) The council could adopt the enclosed resolution approving of the amended joint powers contract. (b) After the adoption of such a resolution a certified copy of the resolution and an executed copy of the contract would be sent to me. (c) The council would pass a resolution or a motion designating its director (board member) and alternate director to the board of the SRA. (d) The foregoing materials would be sent to me with a letter from you indicating that it is the desire of the city to become a member of the SRA. The Suburban Rate Authority will have its next quarterly meeting on the third Wednesday in July, i . e. , July 15 . At that time the board would be able to act upon Shakopee ' s application. 1 �J n w J o� LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLER, KENNEDY, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ Mr. John K. Anderson June 30 , 1981 Page 2 If you have any questions about any of the materials I have enclosed, or the contents of this letter, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Very truly yours , Clayton L. LeFevere CLL: jpf Enclosures • IS LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON, O BRIEN & DRAWZ 1100 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING CLAYTON L.LEFEVERE BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICES HERBERT P. LEFLER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5502 610 BROOKDALE TOWERS CURTIS A. PEARSON TELEPHONE 16121 333-0543 2810 COUNTY ROAD 10 J. DENNIS O'BRIEN BROOKLYN CENTER,MINNESOTA 55430 JOHN E. DRAWZ 16121 561-3200 DAVID J. KENNEDY JOHN B.DEAN GLENN E PURDUE RICHARD J. SCHIEFFER JAMES D. LARSON CHARLES L. LEFEVERE HERBERT P. LEFLER.III JEFFREY J. STRAND JAMES P. O'MEARA August J. BJORKLUND August 7, 1980 THOMAS D.CREIGHTON WENDY L. FREEDMAN Dear Municipal Administrator: This letter is being sent at the request of the Suburban Rate Authority Board of Directors . It involves several matters which they believe will be of par- ticular interest to you. First, your special attention is invited to the NSP electric rate filing which is discussed in the enclosed SRA Board minutes for July 16, 1980 . As you will see, the company has filed for a 12 2/3 percent overall rate increase, but this increase will not be uniform among the various classes of customers . The proposed rate increase for municipalities and for street lighting will be greater than for other classes of customers. This is justified by the company as being necessary in order to equalize the rates of return among the various classes of customers . The SRA Board has authorized a contest of some aspects of NSP ' s rate filing. However, it does not feel that it should resist this shift in the revenue burden ( after the total authorized revenues of the company are determined) . If the SRA were to undertake such an effort and were successful it would only cast a greater share of the revenue burden upon residential, commercial and industrial electric ratepayers within the member municipali- ties . This would put the municipality (as an electric customer) at odds with the other electric consumers in member communities . However, the SRA Board felt that individual municipalities might wish to express their own viewpoints about the proposed equaliza- tion of rates of return among classes of customers . The Board wanted you to be alerted to this question so that you may take whatever action you deem appropriate. One way of making your position known, if you should choose to do so, would be by appear- ing at the general hearings which the Public Utilities Commission LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ t August 7, 1980 Page 2 will hold on NSP' s rate filing. The schedule and location of such general hearings is as follows: September 15, 1980 7:30 p .m. (Monday) AUDITORIUM, HENNEPIN COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 300 So. 6th Street, Minneapolis (Hearing Examiner: Richard DeLong 612/296-8117 ) September 16, 1980 7 :30 p.m. , LARGE HEARING ROOM, 7th Floor, American Center Bldg. , 160 E. Kellogg Blvd. , St. Paul (Hearing Examiner: Richard DeLong 612/296-8117 ) September 17, 1980 2 : 00 p.m. and 7 :30 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL ANNEX, St. Cloud (Hearing Exami- ner: Richard DeLong 612/296-8117 ) September 18, 1980 2 : 00 p.m. ASSEMBLY ROOM, CHIPPEWA COUNTY COURT HOUSE, 11th St. & Washington Avenue, Montevideo (Hearing Examiner: Richard DeLong 612/296-8117 ) September 22 , 1980 2 : 00 p.m. , BOARD ROOM, GOVERNMENT CENTER, Highway 55, Hastings, MN 55033 (Hearing Examiner: Richard DeLong 612/296-8117) 7 :30 p.m. , COMMISSIONER' S ROOM, WINONA COUNTY COURT HOUSE, Winona (Hearing Exami- ner: Richard DeLong 612/296-8117 ) September 23 , 1980 7:30 p.m. COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDING, DINING ROOM, 12 Central, Faribault (Hear- ing Examiner: Richard DeLong 612/296-8117 ) September 24, 1980 7 :30 p.m. LAKESIDE INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL, CAFETERIA, Highway 8, Chisago City, MN (Hearing Examiner: Richard DeLong 612/ 296-8117 ) October 30, 1980 7 :30 p.m. PUBLIC MEETING ROOM, CLAY COUNTY COURT HOUSE, Moorhead (Hearing Examiner: Richard DeLong 612/296-8117 ) A second major action that the SRA Board has asked that we submit to you is the following: • LAW OFFICES - LEFEVERE. LEFLER, PEARSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ (/ August 7, 1980 Page 3 Over the last several years, the SRA Board, has, from time to time, talked about the need for municipal involvement in the programs of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission ( "MWCC" ) . It is clear that the SRA does not have the financial resources or expertise which would be necessary to conduct a detailed review of the capital and operating budgets of the MWCC . On the basis of information which has been presented to the SRA Board by the chairman and the chief planning officer of the Metropolitan Council, it appears that the Metropolitan Council does not presently have the staffing necessary for a complete review of MWCC capital and operating budgets either. (The Metro- politan Council does have authority to appoint the members of the MWCC. It also issues bonds on behalf of the MWCC and it reviews and approves of MWCC ' s capital budgets . ) Recently, there have been hearings conducted by a hearing exami- ner in behalf of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency on the question of what advanced sewage treatment facilities (tertiary treatment) should be required to be constructed by the MWCC. The United States Environmental Protection Agency and others have strongly advocated additional facilities costing between $700 million and $1 billion. If such facilities are required to be constructed, it will , of course, be necessary to make a substan- tial increases in the rates MWCC charges metropolitan area com- munities . Spokesmen for both the MWCC and the Metropolitan Council have expressed disappointment at the fact that there was not more testimony from municipalities during the hearings. This has led the Board of Directors of the SRA to believe that the SRA should be permitted to involve itself in MWCC rate-related issues - even if that involvement is on an occasional and highly selective basis . The Joint and Cooperative Agreement which provides for the Subur- ban Rate Authority does not now authorize SRA participation in any issues involving the MWCC. At its July 16, 1980 meeting, the Board of Directors of the SRA voted unanimously to recommend to SRA member communities that they authorize an amendment to the Joint and Cooperative Agreement so that the SRA can involve itself in MWCC matters to the extent that the Board may from time to time authorize such involvement. We are therefore enclosing a copy of an Amended Joint and Coopera- tive Agreement for the SRA. The changes in the agreement are underscored. They appear on pages 2 , 11 and 12 of the agreement. We are also enclosing a copy of a resolution, for consideration by your city council, which would authorize the execution of the • r • /� i. ' LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON. O'BRIEN & DRAWZ August 7, 1980 Page 4 Amended Joint and Cooperative Agreement by your community. One of the enclosed copies of the Amended Joint and Cooperative Agree- ment and a certified copy of the authorizing resolution should be signed by the appropriate officers of your community and returned to us in the enclosed self-addressed envelope. It is recognized that if the amendment to the Joint and Coopera- tive Agreement is adopted by SRA' s members, there is a risk that the Suburban Rate Authority will be expected to provide a much more thoroughgoing review and investigation of MWCC activities than the SRA, with its limited resources, can provide. It will only be possible for the SRA to involve itself from time to time on MWCC matters on a very limited and selective basis . However, it may wish to act as a focal point for information about such things as PSC hearings and major capital programs of the MWCC. Under certain circumstances , the SRA Board may wish the SRA to assist in organizing the presentation of testimony about MWCC programs before such organizations as the PSC or the Legislature or the Metropolitan Council . The minutes of the April 16 and the July 16, 1980 Board meetings of the SRA are also enclosed because they provide further, more detailed background information about the two issues which are the subjects of this letter. If you should have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to give me a call . Very truly yours, Clayton L. LeFevere, Attorney Suburban Rate Authority CLL: jpf Enclosures AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT I. PARTIES • The parties to this agreement are governmental units of the State of Minnesota. This agreement is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471. 59, as amended. • II . GENERAL PURPOSE The general purpose of this agreement is to establish an organization to monitor the operation and activites of public utilities in the metropolitan area; to conduct research and • investigation of the activities of such utilities; and to conduct such other activities authorized herein as may be necessary to insure equitable and reasonable public utility rates and service levels for the citizens of the members of the organization. III. NAME The name of the organization is the SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY. The name may be changed in accordance with Article XII . IV. DEFINITIONS •• - Section 1. For purposes of this agreement, the terms defined in this article have the meaning given them. . Section 2 . "Authority" means the joint and cooperative organization created by this agreement. Section 3 . "Board" or "Board of Directors" means the Board of Directors of the Authority established by Article VI . Section 4 . "Council" means the governing body of a governmental unit. Section 5. "Governmental Unit" means a city or town in the metropolitan area. Section 6 . "Metropolitan Area" means the metropolitan area defined and described by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473B. 02 , as amended. Section 7 . "Member" means a governmental unit which has entered into and become a party to this agreement. Section 8. "Public Utility" or "Utility" means an investor owned utility supplying gas or electricity under franchise within one or more governmental units; the term may include other utilities as provided in Article XII. The term also includes the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission ("MWCC" ) . The term does not include municipally owned utilities. Section 9 . "Statutory Cities" means cities organized under Minnesota Statute, Chapter 412. V. MEMBERSHIP Section 1 . Any governmental unit in the metropolitan area is eligible to be a member of 'the Authority. Section 2 . A governmental unit desiring to become a member shall execute a copy of this agreement and conform to the member- ship provisions of Article VII . Section 3. The initial members shall be those members who become members on or before January 1, 1975. Section 4 . Governmental units wishing to become members after January 1, 1975, may be admitted only upon the favorable vote of two-thirds of the votes of the members of the Board of Directors. The Board may, in its by-laws, impose conditions upon the admission of additional members . -2- Section 5. A change in the governmental boundaries , struc- ture, classification or organization of a governmental unit affects the eligibility of a unit to become a member of the Authority. VI . - GOVERNING BODY: BOARD OF DIRECTORS Section 1. The governing body of the Authority is its • Board of Directors . Each member is entitled to one director on the Board. Each director is entitled to one vote for each 5, 000 . of population or fraction thereof of the governmental unit represented by the director; provided, however, that each director shall have at least one vote and no director shall have more• than 20 votes. For purposes of this section, population of a governmental unit shall be that population determined pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statute 275 . 53 . Prior to December 31 of each year, the Secretary-Treasurer of the Authority shall determine the population of each member in accordance with this section and certify the results to the chairman. Section 2. A director shall be appointed by resolution of the council of the members for a term of one calendar year. A director shall serve until his successor is appointed and qualifies. Directors shall serve without compensation from the • Authority, but nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent a governmental unit from compensating its director for service on the Board if such compensation is otherwise authorized by law. Section 3 . The Board, in its by-laws, may provide for the appointment of alternate directors and prescribe the extent of . their powers and duties. -3 • - Section 4 . Vacancies in the office of director will exist for any of the reasons set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 351 . 02 , or upon a revocation of a director' s appointment by a member duly filed with the Authority: Vacancies shall be filled by appointment for the unexpired portion of the term of director by the council of the member whose position on the Board is vacant. Section 5 . A majority of the votes of the Board of • Directors constitutes a quorum, but a smaller number may adjourn - from time to time. VII . MEETINGS - ELECTION OF OFFICERS • Section 1. A governmental unit may enter into this agreement by resolution of its council and the duly authorized execution of a copy of this by its proper officers. Thereupon, the clerk or other appropriate officer of the governmental unit shall file the executed copy of the agreement and a certified copy of the authorizing resolution with the city manager of the City of Columbia Heights , Minnesota. The resolution authorizing the execution of the agreement shall also designate the first director for the governmental unit on the Board. Section 2 . This agreement is effective on the date when executive agreements and authorizing resolutions of seven governmental units presently members of the existing Suburban Rate Authority have been filed as provided in Section 1 of this Article . • Section 3 . Within thirty days after the effective date of this agreement, the mayor .of the member having the largest population shall call the first meeting of the Board of Directors -4 • which .shall be held no later than 15 days after such call. Section 4. The first meeting of the Board shall be the organizational meeting of the Authority. At the organizational meeting, and at each annual meeting thereafter, the Board shall select from among the directors a chairman, a vice-chairman, and a secretary-treasurer. Section 5 . At the organizational meeting, or as soon there- after as it may reasonably be done, the Board shall adopt by-laws - governing its procedures, including the time, place, notice for. and frequency of its regular meetings , procedure for calling special meetings, and such other matters as are required by this agreement. The Board may amend the by-laws from time to title. The Board shall meet at least once each year and on such . • other dates as may be provided in its by-laws . VIM . POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Section 1. The powers and duties of the Board of Directors of the Authority are set forth in this article . Section 2. The Board may make such contracts and enter into such agreements as it deems necessary to make effective .. any power granted to the Authority by this agreement. .It may contract with any of its members or others to provide space, services or materials on behalf of the Authority. Section 3 . It may provide for the prosecution, defense, or other participation in actions or proceedings at law in which it may have an interest, and may employ counsel for that purpose . It may employ such other persons as it deems necessary to accomplish its powers and duties. Such employees may be on a full-time or • _5- 9 19.- part-time, or consulting basis as the Board determines , and the Board may make any required employer contributions which local government units arc authorized or required to make by law. . Section 4 . It may conduct such research and investigation and take such action as it deems necessary, including partici- pation and appearance in proceedings of state and federal regulatory, legislative or administrative bodies , on any matter related to or affecting utility costs , levels of service, rates or franchises , and advise members concerning such matters with a view toward obtaining compliance .with franchises granted to • utilities and insuring reasonable rates and service levels for the members and their residents . The Board may conduct the activities authorized by this section on behalf of any govern- mental unit located outside the metropolitan area at the request of such a unit, embodied in a resolution of its governing body; provided however, that the conduct of such activities on behalf of any such governmental unit shall be specifically authorized by the Board and shall be subject to such reasonable conditions as to cost of service and other matters as may be imposed by the Board. Section 5 . The Board may obtain from any utility and from any other source such information relating to utility rates, costs and service levels as any of its members is entitled to obtain from such utilities . Section 6 . It may receive and hold moneys from any utility to the extent and in the manner as may be provided by this -6- • agreement or any franchise granted to a utility by a member; and it may accept voluntary contributions from its members or other sources as provided in Article X. The Authority shall have no • taxing' power,. It may accumulate reserve funds and may invest and re-invest its funds not needed for current expenses in the manner and subject to the limitations applicable by law to statutory cities . The Board may not incur obligations in excess of funds then available to Authority. Section 7 . The Board shall make a financial accounting • and report to the members at least once each year. The books and records of the Authority shall be open and available for • inspection by members at all reasonable times . Section 8 . The Board may accept gifts, apply for and .use grants of money or other property from members or other govern- mental units or organizations , and may enter into agreements required in connection therewith , and may hold, use, and dispose of such moneys or property in accordance with the terms of the • grant, gift or agreement relating thereto. Section 9 . The Board shall establish the annual budget for . the Authority as provided in Article X. • Section 10 . The Board may, in its by-laws , establish an executive committee and may delegate duties and authority to such a committee between Board meetings . Section 11. The Board may purchase public liability insurance and such other security bonds and insurance as it may deem necessary. -7- Section 12 . The Board may exercise any other power necessary and convenient to the implementation of the powers and duties given to it by this agreement. IX. OFFICERS Section 1. The officers of the Board shall consist of a chairman, a vice-chairman, and a secretary-treasurer who shall be _ elected by the Board, for a term of one year and until their . successors are elected and qualify, at the annual meeting. New officers shall take office at the adjournment of the annual meet- ing at which they were elected. An officer must be a duly qualified and appointed director. Section 2 . A vacancy in the office of chairman, vice- chairman, or secretary-treasurer shall occur for any of the reasons for which a vacancy in the office of director shall occur. Vacancies in these offices shall be filled by the Board for the unexpired portion of the term. Section 3. The chairman shall preside at all meetings of • the Board. The vice-chairman shall act as chairman in the absence, disqualification or disability of the chairman . Section 4 . The secretary-treasurer is responsible for keep- ing a record of all the proceedings of the Board, for custody of all funds , for keeping of all financial records of the Authority and for such other duties as may be assigned to him by the Board. Persons may be employed to perform such services under his super- vision and direction as may be authorized by the Board. The • secretary-treasurer shall post a fidelity bond or other insurance • -8- • against loss of Authority funds in the account specified by the Board. The cost of such bond or insurance shall be paid by the Board. The Board may provide for compensation of the secretary- treasurer for his services . X. FINANCIAL MATTERS • Section 1. The fiscal year of the Authority is the calendar year. Section 2 . Authority funds may be expended in accordance with the procedures established by law for statutory cities . Orders , checks and drafts shall be signed by the chairman and countersigned by the secretary-treasurer or such other person as may be designated by the Board in its by-laws . Other legal instruments shall' be executed on behalf of the Authority by the chairman and the secretary-treasurer. Contracts shall be let and purchases made in accordance with the procedures established by law for statutory cities . Section 3. The activities of the Authority shall be • financed by funds available to it under Article XII, from • voluntary contributions from its members or from other sources , and by contributions from members of the Authority if it is determined by the Board by a two-thirds vote of all votes of then existing members , that such contributions are necessary. 'Such determination shall be made by the Board not later than August 1 of each year in order to obligate members to make contributions during the ensuing calendar. year. The total annual contribution by members for the ensuing year shall be established -9- by the Board on the basis to anticipated expenditures and only if the anticipated expenditures are in excess of the anticipated funds othersaise ;to the Authority. The contribution in any year by a member shall be in direct proportion to the number of votes to which the director representing the member on the Board is entitled. Such contributions shall be made by the member to the Authority as follows : One-half on or before February 1 of each year and one-half on or before August 1 of each year. Section 4 . An annual budget shall be adopted by the Board at the organizational meeting and at the annual meeting each year. Copies of the budget shall be mailed promptly to the chief administrative office of each member. The budget is deemed approved by the members except one who, at any time prior to the annual meeting gives notice in writing to the secretary- treasurer that it is withdrawing from the Authority. XI . DURATION AND DISSOLUTION Section 1. The Authority shall exist, and this agreement is in effect, for an indefinite term until dissolved in accordance with Section 3 of this article . Section 2 . A member may withdraw from the Authority by filing a written notice with the secretary-treasurer by June 15 'of any year giving notice of withdrawal at the end of that calendar year; and membership shall continue until the effective date of the withdrawal. A notice of withdrawal may be rescinded at any time by a member. If a member withdraws before dissolu- tion of the Authority, the member shall have no claim on the • assets of the Authority. • I -10- ( 9 � Section 3. The Authority shall be dissolved whenever the withdrawal of a member reduces total membership in the Authority to less than the number of members required for organization of the Authority under Article VII, Section 2. The Authority may be dissolved at any time by unanimous vote of all the members of the Board of Directors . Section 4 . In the event of dissolution, the Board shall determine the measures necessary to affect the dissolution and shall provide for the taking of such measures as promptly as circumstances permit, subject to the provisions of this agreement. Upon dissolution of the Authority all remaining assets of the Authority, after payment of obligations, shall be distributed among the then existing members in proportion to the number of their votes on the Board and in accordance with procedures established by the Board. The Authority shall continue to exist after dissolution for such period, no longer than six months , as is necessary to wind up its affairs but for no other purpose. XII . TRANSITIONAL AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS Section 1. The activities of the Authority shall be con- fined to the MWCC and gas and electric utilities, provided however, that the Authority may extend and broaden its activities to any other public utility as defined in this agreement by a 75% majority vote of all the votes of the Board of Directors, taken at a regular meeting of the Board. In the event the activities of the Authority are so extended and broadened, the Authority and -11- its Board of Directors shall have all of the powers and duties with reference to any other public utility that it has with reference to the MWCC and gas and electric utilities under this agreement. Section 2 . The name of the organization created by this agreement may be changed when deemed appropriate by the Board, but only upon a 75% majority vote of all the votes of the Board of Directors taken at a regular meeting of the Board. If the name of the organization is so changed, the Board shall provide in its by-laws for necessary measures to effect the change in official and unofficial documents , papers , and other essential respects . Section 3. It is the intention of the parties to this agreement that the organization created thereby is the successor to the Suburban Rate Authority now in existence. It is further the intention of the parties that any funds made available to the organization created by the agreement from assets of the present Suburban Rate Authority shall be used exclusively for the purposes of this agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned governmental unit has caused this agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officers and delivered on its behalf. -12- In the presence of: (Governmental Unit) By Its • • By Its Dated: , 19 • Filed in the office of , this day of , 1S •• • I -13- 7)9- RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WHEREAS , the City of , Minnesota has entered into a Joint and Cooperative Agreement providing for the creation of the Suburban Rate Authority, and WHEREAS, the present form of such Joint and Cooperative Agreement does not authorize the Suburban Rate Authority to participate in proceedings or engage in activities involving the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Suburban Rate Authority has recommended that such organization be authorized to par- ticipate in proceedings or engage in activities involving the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, and WHEREAS , it appears necessary and desirable that such author- ity be conferred upon the Suburban Rate Authority and that this be accomplished by the execution of the amendment to the Joint and Cooperative Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of , Minnesota as follows : 1. The mayor and (Clerk, Manager) are authorized and directed to execute the Amendment to the Joint and Cooperative Agreement giving authority for Suburban Rate Authority involvement in matters relating to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. 2 . The city clerk is directed to file a copy of the executed Amendment to the Joint and Cooperative Agreement , together with a certified copy of this resolution, with the Secretary/Treasurer of the Suburban Rate Authority. Adopted 1980 Mayor ATTEST: Clerk • • MINUTES OF QUARTERLY MEETING OF SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY April 16 , 1980 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof the quarterly meeting of the Suburban Rate Authority was held at the Ambassador Motor Hotel , in the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, on Wednesday, April 16 , 1980 , commencing at 6 : 30 p.m. 1 . Call to Order: The meeting was called to order by Chairman David McGraw. 2 . Roll Call : Upon roll call attendance was found to be as follows : Bloomington Robert W. Darr Brooklyn Park Graydon R. Boeck Champlin Michael T. Baldwin Columbia Heights Gayle Norberg Bruce G. Nawrocki Edina J. N. Dalen Fridley Cheryl Moses Greenwood Wm. Schoell Maplewood John C. Greavu Minnetonka Donald Asmus Robert DeGhetto Osseo Catherine Goth Plymouth Frederick Moore Richfield Joyce Wilde Robbinsdale Dan Briggs Roseville James F. Andre St. Louis Park Keith Meland Shoreview David P. McGraw Shorewood William Keeler Spring Park Patricia Osmonson Wayzata Robert Mitchell Also in attendance were George F. Hess , SRA rate consultant; Clayton L. LeFevere and James D. Larson, SRA attorneys; Robert Ehrenberg, former chairman of SRA; Salisbury Adams , chairman, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission ; Tony Gnerre, Deputy Chief Administrator, Metro- politan Waste Control Commission. 3 . Presentation to Robert Ehrenberg: The chairman presented a plaque to Mr. Robert Ehrenberg recognizing his outstanding public service as a participant in the activities of the Suburban Rate Authority. The plaque presented to Mr. Ehrenberg in behalf of the SRA read as follows : "WHEREAS, Robert F. Ehrenberg, as part of a long and distinguished record of public service, served as a leader in the founding of the Suburban Rate Authority (SRA) in 1963; and WHEREAS, continuously since that time, for more than 17 years, he rendered faithful and highly -2- effective service to the SRA, as a director, as its chairman, and in numerous other capacities; and WHEREAS, by reason of such service the SRA has been able to serve its member municipalities in such a way as to effect savings of great magnitude in utility rates and charges; and WHEREAS, it is highly appropriate that his ser- vices and achievements far the public good should be permanently recognized and expressed, NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Suburban Rate Authority on this 16th day of April , 1980 , present to Robert F. Ehrenberg this CITATION FOR DISTINGUISHED PUBLIC SERVICE as a visible and lasting expression of gratitude for all of the service he has rendered and the great benefits he has secured to the general public through such service. David P. McGraw J. N. Dalen Chairman Secretary-Treasurer" Mr. Ehrenberg responded by expressing his great appreciation for the recognition being given to him. He cited the SRA as one of the most successful joint endeavors ever undertaken by metropolitan municipali- ties and he expressed his hopes for the continued success of the organization. 4 . Approval of Minutes : The minutes of the annual meeting of January 16 , 1980 , were presented. It was moved by Mr. Greavu, seconded by Mr. Norberg that the minutes be approved as mailed. Carried unanimously. 5 . Treasurer ' s Report: Mr. Dalen presented a financial report showing the financial condition of the SRA as of March 31 , 1980. The report indicated that on that date the SRA had a cash fund balance of $5 , 974 . 31 and investments costing $94 , 504 . 65 and having a face value of $95, 000 . 00. It was moved by Mr. Schoell , seconded by Mr. Asmus that the treasurer' s report be received. Carried unanimously. 6 . Claims : Mr . Dalen then presented the following claims : LeFevere, Lefler, Pearson, O' Brien & Drawz , legal services for the period from January 3, 1980 through April 4 , 1980 - $ 942. 19 • ([9-- -3- Dinner expense of Messrs . Adams , Gnerre and Ehrenberg - $ 23. 25 It was moved by Mr. Asmus , seconded by Mr. Greavu that these claims be approved and paid. Carried unanimously. 7 . Status of Regulatory Proceedings : Mr. Larson reported on the status of regulatory proceedings deemed to be of interest to the SRA. He reported on the principal issues involved in the United Telephone rate filing, such issues being the authorized rate of return and the manner and extent of including construction work in progress in the rate base. He distributed a document undertaking to show who the telephone, electric and gas suppliers are for each of the members of the SRA. He reported that the Minnesota Public Service Commission, after reconsideration, has allowed the Minnesota Gas Company to recover, in .its rates, one-half of its research-related expenses. Concerning Northern States Power Company' s gas filing in the St. Paul and suburban areas, he indicated that the Minnesota Public Service Commission has ordered a separate hearing on the question of whether it will require "rolling-in" the high cost of Canadian gas with the low cost of domestic gas on a system-wide basis . Currently, the customers in the Moorehead and East Grand Forks service areas of Northern State Power pay a much higher energy cost for natural gas because they are served by the high-cost Canadian supply. On NSP ' s electric rate filing, he reported, the MPSC has issued an order in the "time-of-day" case . The Commission has ordered what the company has proposed, that is , "that time-of-day pricing be made available to all customer classes on a voluntary basis. Special me- ters will be made available (at a cost of about $200. 00) and will be paid for through a monthly charge of between $1 . 50 and $3. 00 per month" . He reported that there appears to be a prospect that either Minnesota Gas Company or Northern States Power-Electric, or both, may be filing for increased rates before the next quarterly meeting of the SRA. It was moved by Mr. Norberg, seconded by Mr. Keeler that the attorneys for the SRA be authorized to intervene in behalf of the SRA ' s member communities in the event any such filings should occur, with the extent of the SRA' s participation to be determined as more information about any such rate filing becomes available. Carried unanimously. 8 . Report Relating to Metropolitan Waste Control Commission : The chairman introduced Mr. Salisbury Adams , chairman of the MWCC. Mr. Adams reported on the capital costs of the metropolitan sewage disposal system, indicating that between 1969 and 1983 the MWCC will expend approximately $300, 000 , 000 . He indicated that Project #201 would necessitate the additional capital expenditure of some $640 , 000 , 000 over a 5 to 10 year period. This additional capital r • -4- expenditure would also add approximately $10, 000, 000 per year to the annual operating expenses of the MWCC. At the present time such operating expenses are on the order of $56 , 000 , 000. He indicated that the Pollution Control Commission and some other organizations are advocating that the sewage effluent from the metro- politan system be brought down to dissolved oxygen levels which would necessitate the expenditure of another $300 , 000 , 000 to $400 , 000 , 000 . He commented on the sludge disposal problem, indicating that if the problem remains unsolved, it will cost the MWCC approximately $50 . 00 per ton to provide for sludge disposal and that this would add an additional $10 , 000 , 000 per year to the MWCC' s operating expenses within the next 4 or 5 years . He reported that the Environmental Protection Agency is bringing pressure to bear upon the MWCC to enter into a consent decree which, if signed, would add several million dollars per year to the operating expenses of the MWCC because of the additional staff requirements and reporting experiences which the decree would require. He said that the MWCC is resisting this. He urged input from the municipalities to resist what he characterized as excessive demands upon the MWCC . Mr. Tony Gnerre , Deputy Chief Administrator of the MWCC, reported on the manner in which capital and operating costs of the MWCC are distributed among the communities served and to be served by the metropolitan sewer disposal system. There were many questions about the principles which are applied in the distribution of such costs. Members of the board asked whether information is available on the increased costs which will result from the proposed new requirements which had been discussed by Mr. Adams . They were advised that a community-by-community calculation of that sort has not been prepared . There then followed a discussion of whether the SRA should amend its bylaws or the joint contract so as to permit the SRA to be involved in matters involving the rates and costs of the MWCC . At the conclu- sion of this discussion it was moved by Mr . Briggs , seconded by Mr. Norberg that the SRA member communities be notified that at the July meeting of the SRA board, consideration will be given to a proposal to amend the joint contract, or the bylaws , or both, as necessary, -5- so as to permit the SRA to monitor the activities of the MWCC and to provide it with support, when deemed appropriate, in an effort to avoid unduly burdensome federal and state requirements. Carried unanimously. 9 . Adjournment: There being no further business to come before the meeting, it was adjourned. Secretary ATTEST : Chairman Treasurer' s Report attached. • SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY ANALYSIS OF CHANGE IN CASH BALANCE • SAINT LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA ' For Three Months Ended March 31, 1980 Balance at January 1, 1980 Additions : $12, 729.35 • Sale of investments $19,951.84 . Interest income 3 ,085. 16 23 ,037.00 Deductions : $35, 766.35 Surety Bond $ 125 .00 Investments purchased 28,463.40 LeFevere, Lefler, Pearson, O'Brien & Drawz-Legal services 1,203.64 29, 792.04 BALANCE MARCH 31, 1980 $ 5,974.31 • INVESTMENTS Federal Farm Credit Bank Bonds 12. 80% Due 10-1-80 $ 5,000.00 Federal Farm Credit Bank Bonds 11.30 Due 7-1-SO 20,031. 25 Federal Land Bank Eonds 8.85 'Due 7-2.0-FO 4,010.00 U. S. Treasury Bill:, 11.05 Due 1-2-81 13,463 .40 Federal Farm Credit Bank Bonds 10.00 Due 1-2-31 42,000.00 Federal Farm Credit Bank Bonds 10. 95 Due 10-20-32 10,000.00 $94, 504.65 FACE VALUE $95 ,000.00 n • :,J. MINUTES OF QUARTERLY MEETING OF SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY July 16 , 1980 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof the quarterly meeting of the Suburban Rate Authority was held at the Ambassador Motor Hotel, in the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, on Wednesday, July 16 , 1980 , commencing at 6 : 30 p.m. 1. Call to Order: The meeting was called to order by Chairman David McGraw. 2 . Roll Call : Upon roll call attendance was found to be as follows : Bloomington Robert W. Darr Brooklyn Park Graydon R. Boeck Columbia Heights Gayle Norberg Bruce G. Nawrocki Edina J. N. Dalen Mendota Heights Orvil J. Johnson Elizabeth Witt Minnetonka Robert DeGhetto Plymouth Frederick Moore Richfield Vern Luettinger Juanita Collins Robbinsdale Roger Kroh Shoreview David P. McGraw Also in attendance were Clayton L. LeFevere and James D. Larson, SRA attorneys; Mr. Charles Weaver, Chairman of the Metropolitan Council and Mr. Maurice Dorton, Director of Planning of the Metropolitan Council. 3 . Approval of Minutes : The minutes of the April 16 , 1980 quarterly meeting of the SRA Board were presented. It was moved by Mr. Norberg, seconded by Mr. Luettinger that the minutes be approved as mailed. Carried unanimously. 4 . Treasurer ' s Report: Mr. Dalen presented a financial report showing the financial condition of the SRA as of June 30 , 1980 . The report indicated that on that date the SRA had a cash fund balance of $5 , 008 . 87 and investments costing $94 , 504 . 65 and having a face value of $95 , 000 . 00 . It was moved by Mr. Nawrocki, seconded by Mr. Johnson that the treasurer ' s report be received. Carried unanimously. • 5. Claims : Mr. Dalen then presented the following claims : LeFevere, Lefler, Pearson, O 'Brien & Drawz , legal services for the period from April 4 , 1980 through July 10 , 1980 - $ 1 , 775 . 04 Meeting expense - Messrs . Charles Weaver and Maurice Dorton - $ 15 . 50 It was moved by Mr. Dalen, seconded by Mr. Norberg that these claims be approved and paid. Carried unanimously. 6 . Status of Regulatory Proceedings : Mr. Larson reported on the NSP electric rate filing. The company has filed for a general 12 . 66% rate increase which would entitle the company to a $77 . 5 million increase in company revenues for the test year which commences on August 1 , 1980 , and ends on July 31 , 1981 . He further reported as follows : The company has implemented an interim rate adjustment increasing each rate class 12 . 66% . This interim rate adjust- ment will be effective until the Commission issues an order on this case. If the rate increase were to be distributed in such a way that each class of customers would provide the same rate of return in the test year, the increases would be as follows : Residential : 22 . 7% Commercial and Industrial : 5 . 3% Municipal : 43 . 3% Lighting: 30 . 4% However, the company has proposed that rate adjustments be made so that the rates of return would be equalized among classes of customers over a three-year period rather than a one-year period. The company has therefore proposed the following increases which, for the test year, would give them an overall 12 . 66% rate increase : Residential : 15 . 7% Commercial and Industrial : 10 . 4% Municipal : 24 . 0% Lighting : 18 . 5% -2- Municipal governments will no doubt be particularly affected by the proposed 24 . 0% municipal increase and the 18 . 5% lighting increase. The implications of such increases are not presently known. The municipal rates are, in many instances , predominantly for municipal pumping, e . g. municipal water and sewer pumps . Increases in municipal rates , therefore , might become operating costs for the municipalities ' utilities , to a large extent. Such costs would presumably be passed on to utility customers . The increase in street lighting rates could be expected to be borne , in most instances , as part of the operating bud- gets of municipalities . The increased rate would be paid by taxpayers and would be borne, therefore , on the basis of taxable property valuations . These valuations , of course , would result in a somewhat different distribution in the revenue load than would be the case if the increased revenue were collected from the residential , commercial and indus- trial customers , as such. The Public Service Commission will decide what the total revenue requirements of the company will be. It will then decide how the revenue burden will be distributed among the various classes of customers . If the percentage increase in rates for municipal and street lighting services is reduced, it would then be necessary to increase the rates for residen- tial , commercial and industrial services . Apart from the rate design questions , the primary issues in the case will be : (a) The company ' s requested 15 . 5% rate of return on common equity which compares with a 13% rate of return on common equity allowed by the Commission in the last filing. The company justifies its request for this high return on equity as neces- sary to attract investment as it forecasts a $6 . 3 billion investment over the next decade with $2 . 5 billion to come from the investment community. (b) The company plans to write off $10 . 9 million of its investment in the Tyrone Energy Park in the test year. This write-off will continue over a five-year period at approximately $11 million per year. (c) The company has incorporated a number of standards urged by the National Energy Agency in the Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act of 1978 . Among these are time-of-use rates , the elimination of declining block rates , and the setting of rates on a cost-of-service basis . The company has elim- inated its conservation rate break and, as indica- ted above, is attempting to equalize rates of return by class . -3- (d) The company is asking for an increase in working capital to account for the lag in payment of depreciation, deferred taxes , and nuclear fuel amortization. This was an issue on the last case which the SRA opposed and successfully convinced the Commission to deny the adjustment. This is an issue which the SRA might again wish to pursue. Approximately $3 million of the company ' s $77 . 5 million increase results from this proposed treatment of deferred taxes, depreciation, and nuclear fuel amortization. He reported that the following schedule has been established for the case : Deadline for filing intervention July 14 , 1980 Deposition of NSP witnesses by intervenors August 11 through 22 , 1980 Intervenor testimony filed on October 6 , 1980 Depositions of intervenor witnesses October 13 through 17 , 1980 Rebuttal testimony filed November 10 , 1980 Evidentiary hearings November 17 through December 12 , 1980 Statutory deadline for Commission order April 30 , 1981 The following parties have intervened in the case : Department of Public Services Office of Consumer Services Fargo-Moorhead Apartment Association People Involved in Rice County City of Moorhead St. Paul Chamber of Commerce Minnesota Energy Agency Minnesota Senior Federation Minnesota Department of Administration Minnesota Public Interest Research Group City of St. Paul • -4- At the conclusion of his report, there was discussion about the proper role for the SRA to play in this proceeding. Mr. Larson indicated that he did not believe it would be advisable for the SRA to attempt to present testimony on the proper rate of return. He said that the Participating Department Staff and the Office of Consumer Services are jointly sponsoring an outside rate-of-return witness . This will provide testimony in addition to Staff testimony on that subject. He indicated that there are some questions as to what expenses ought to be included in the rate base. He cited the company' s attempt in the last proceeding to include depreciation, nuclear fuel amortization and several other items in working capital. The company' s effort to include some of these items was defeated through the efforts of the SRA and through the testimony of Mr. Hess in the last proceeding. The company is attempting to include such items again. Their witness is attacking the rationale for the company ' s decision. Approximately $3 million in annual revenues is involved in this controversy. Mr. Larson indicated that he believed the SRA should continue to fight to disallow these items as part of the working capital. He said he thought this could be done without the active involvement of Mr. Hess through cross-examination and briefing. He pointed out that costs incurred on the proposed Boecker No. 4 generating plant are being expensed in this case. After further discussion, it was moved by Mr. Boeck , seconded by Mr. Luettinger that the Board authorize and approve the intervention of the SRA in NSP ' s current electric rate filing and that the attorneys be authorized to participate on a limited basis in the proceeding; such participation to be limited to not more than $15 , 000 in legal expenses; and with such participation to consist of monitoring the proceed- ing, cross-examining where necessary and briefing issues where appropriate. Carried unanimously. Members of the Board requested the attorneys to advise all member municipalities of the municipal and lighting rate increases which are being proposed by the company. It was also requested that the municipalities be informed of the dates of the general hearings so that municipal officials may, if they so desire, appear and testify about the affect of the proposed increases upon municipal budgets . -5- Mr. Norberg moved that the SRA tender its services to any municipal corporations which desire to oppose the municipal and lighting rate increases with such representation to be paid for by the communities requesting such special represen- tation on the rate design issues. The motion was discussed and after discussion, there being no second, the chairman declared that the motion had failed. 7 . Corporate Authorization Resolution : Secretary/Treasurer Dalen presented a proposed corporate authorization resolution designating the First National Bank of Minneapolis as depository for the funds of the SRA and permitting the signing of checks by any two of the following : Chairman, Vice-Chairman and Secretary/Treasurer It was moved by Mr. Dalen, seconded by Mr. Johnson, that the resolution be adopted and that the officers of the corporation be authorized to present a verified copy of such resolution to the depository. Carried unanimously. 8 . Possible Assessment of Members : Secretary/Treasurer Dalen was asked to comment on whether or not he recommended any assessment of members for the year 1981. He indicated that he did not recommend such assessment . After discussion, it was moved by Mr. Dalen, seconded by Mr. Luettinger that there be no assessment of members for the year 1981. Carried unanimously. 9 . Comments of Charles Weaver, Chairman of the Metropolitan Council : The chairman introduced Mr. Charles Weaver, Chairman of the Metropolitan Council ("MC") and indicated that Mr. Weaver had been invited to comment on the role of the Metropolitan Council in relation to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission ("MWCC") . Mr. Weaver was accompanied by Mr. Maurice Dorton, Director of Planning of the Metropolitan Council . Mr. Weaver indicated that the members of the MWCC are appointed by the MC. The MC does not review the operating budget of the MWCC but it does , annually, review the MWCC ' s capital budget. The MC does attempt to look at the effect of capital expenditures upon the operating costs of the MWCC. He indicated that he was somewhat concerned about whether there is a sufficient flow of information between the MC and the MWCC so that the review of the MC is adequate. He said that he was greatly concerned about this question. The scope of activity of the MWCC is so great and so technical in nature that it is almost impossible for the MC to maintain the kind of staff which would be necessary to permit a thoroughgoing analysis of the capital and operating recommendations being made by the MWCC staff. -6- • / - He agreed with the necessity for effective review of the programs of the MWCC and expressed hope that some solution could be found to this problem. Mr. Dorton indicated that the MC has taken seriously its responsibility in reviewing MWCC capital costs . The MC has given the MWCC policy direction in several respects : (1) It has directed that the MWCC should not move towards advanced waste treatment facilities (tertiary treatment) . Preliminary planning for such facilities has been approved but detailed construction planning has not been approved. This has displeased the EPA but the MC has asked that construction planning be deferred until there is sufficient evidence to show that the costs of such tertiary facilities can be justified. He reported that the federal General Accounting Office ("GAO") appears likely to recommend against federal grants for such advanced waste treatment facilities. He indicated that there is a possibility that tertiary treatment would not make any real difference in water quality in some surface waters in the metropolitan area, such as the Minnesota River. He said that at the recent PCA hearings the MC had taken the position that the present and potential uses of the Mississippi and Minnesota Rivers do not appear to justify the standards of treatment which were being pro- posed and were under consideration by the PCA. He said that all of the testimony on such proposals has been submitted and that the report of the hearing examiner is expected in the near future. (2) The MC has asked the MWCC to go slow on the elimination of combined sewers. This was done because it was not yet apparent that the benefits to be derived from such sanitary sewer-storm sewer separation will justify the costs. This is because the use of combined sewers has not resulted in the discharge of a large percentage of sanitary sewer flow into public waters in the metropolitan area. He indicated that St. Paul is disputing development in some of the suburbs because St. Paul gets more runoff as the result of such development and must therefore pay for the treatment of such additional runoff. He indicated that the age of metropolitan sewers and the rehabilitation costs need to be studied. The MWCC has been urged to study the magnitude of the rehabilitation problem. He said that the position of the MC is that the MWCC (in the metropolitan area) should try to use the sewer capacity that we now have in interceptors and plants before undertaking to build any new major facility. -7- j . . . The MC has tried to support plants which are less labor- intensive but he acknowledged that there is still some question as to whether current efforts along this line have proven to be cost effective. He said that in selecting capital cost options , operating costs are taken into account. He also indicated that it has been difficult for the MC to develop the staff expertise necessary to challenge MWCC proposals. He cited a number of instances where a number of proposals were modified by the MC. He then commented on some issues that will be coming up in the future. The last bonds issued by the MC for the benefit of the MWCC were issued in 1972 . Debt service has been fairly constant but the operating budget has been rising, in part as a consequence of extensive new construction. A very significant amount of new debt will have to be incurred in the early 1980 ' s . The question will be how much should be constructed in the way of new facilities (so as to open up new service territories in the metropolitan area) and how much shall be expended for better treatment facilities. He indicated that not all new facility costs resulting from 1 facilities already constructed, or under construction, have been included in the MWCC ' s operating budget. These costs will add to MWCC ' s rates in the absence of any further capital investments . The MC has reviewed and commented upon MWCC ' s user charges 1 and has asked the MWCC to "hold the line" on SAC charges pending further study. It will be necessary to determine the appropriateness of increasing SAC charges to raise money to pay the increasing debt service expenses which will result from additional bond issues . A decision on whether to increase SAC charges for this and other reasons will probably not be made until 1982 or 1983 . He said that the MC has not yet decided what role it feels it should play in reviewing the operating expenses of the MWCC. He said that both the MC and the MWCC were disappointed that there was not more municipal participation before the PCA on the hearings concerning advanced waste treatment. Members of the Board indicated that the municipalities were not well advised on the issues involved in the case and did not have the expertise or funding which would permit them to play an active role. Mr. Dorton indicated that the EPA would continue to press. for advance waste treatment facilities and that it could prove very helpful if the municipalities would be able to involve themselves in future proceedings involving such proposals. -8- • At the conclusion of the comments of Mr. Weaver and Mr. Dorton, the members of the Board discussed what the appro- priate response might be to the expressed need for municipal involvement in matters involving the capital and operating budgets of the MWCC. Mr. DeGhetto indicated that the Metropolitan League of Municipalities has a Metropolitan Agencies Committee on which he serves. This committee is interested in whatever actions the SRA may take with reference to the MWCC and its rates and charges . He requested that the attorney advise Mr. Verne Peterson of any decisions made by the SRA at this meeting. Mr. Darr expressed concern about the fact that the MC is unable to marshal the expertise necessary to provide an adequate review of MWCC capital and operating budgets. He and other members of the Board expressed the view that the SRA would not be able to conduct an adequate budget review. He advocated authorizing the SRA to involve itself in mat- ters involving the MWCC but suggested that such involvement would, for budgetary reasons , of necessity be a limited involvement. The SRA would probably have to confine itself to adopting resolutions , providing testimony, appearing at some hearings and taking positions on issues which may arise in connection with MCC operations . After further discussion, it was moved by Mr. Norberg, seconded by Mr. Dalen that the Board of Directors of the SRA recommend to the SRA' s members that they adopt an amendment to the SRA' s Joint Power Agreement which would permit the SRA to involve itself in matters relating to the MWCC. Carried unanimously. In response to Mr. DeGhetto ' s suggestion, it was agreed that Mr. Peterson of the League of Metropolitan Municipalities be advised of this action and that he should receive copies of those mailings of the SRA that are sent to SRA members. Mr. Weaver indicated that he would send the SRA attorneys a proposed resolution which could be adopted by individual SRA members which would lend support to the positions taken by the MC at the PCA hearings . 10 . Adjournment : There being no further business to come before the meeting, it was moved by Mr. Boeck, seconded by Mr. Norberg that the meeting be adjourned. Carried unanimously. 1 Secretary ATTEST: Chairman Treasurer ' s Report attached. -9 • - SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY ANALYSIS OF CHANGE IN CASH BALANCE SAINT LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA For Six Months Ended June 30, 1980 • Balance at January 1, 1980 $12,729.35 Additions: Sale of Investments $19,951.84 Interest Income 3,085.16 23,037.00 35,766.35 Deductions: Surety Bond $ 125.00 Investments Purchased 28,463.40 LeFevere, Lefler, Pearson, O'Brien & Drawz Legal Services 2,145.83 Other 23.25 30,757.48 BALANCE JUNE 30, 1980 $ 5,008.87 • • INVESTMENTS Federal Farm Credit Bank Bonds 12.80% Due 10-1-80 $ 5,000.00 Federal Farm Credit Bank Bonds 11. 30 Due 7-1-80 20,031.25 Federal Land Bank Bonds 8.85 Due 7-20-80 4,010.00 U.S. Treasury Bills 11.05 Due 1-2-81 13,463.40 Federal Farm Credit Bank Bonds 10.00 Due 1-2-81 42,000.00 Federal Farm Credit Bank Bonds 10.95 Due 10-20-82 10,000.00 $94,504.65 FACE VALUE $95,000.00 f MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director RE: Audit Services for 1981 DATE: July 28, 1981 The City of Shakopee has had the same audit firm for the past 20, or more, years with the exception of 1969 when the State Auditor performed the examina- tion. In addition, the same individual has been the senior on the job for approximately the past six years. I believe that a City should change auditors on a somewhat regular basis. However, unless service unsatisfactory, they should not be changed more often than three years. One of the most important criteria for an auditor is to be independent. The longer a firm, especially an individual is on a job, the more susceptable to erosion the independence becomes. Also, the rotation of auditors brings in new people for a "fresh look" at things that may have become commonplace or unnoticed by previous auditors. Another factor to consider is timing. The senior from our present auditor has two other governmental clients with fiscal year ending December 31. In addition, this senior is heavily involved with income tax return preparation. Both of these factors represent competition for the City regarding the auditor's time in late winter. Having more auditor time available earlier in the year would either force staff to assign a higher priority to the annual financial report earlier in the year or have the auditor prepare part of the report in order to achieve an earlier completion date. A third area is the technical or theoretical area. Due to the nature of my duties, I have not been able to advance my technical "accounting" capabilities and therefore feel that I am in fact losing ground in this area. I would expect an auditor to be more experienced in this area (governmental accounting) and to provide me with insight and exposure to recent developments and topics in the accounting profession. This is currently a weak spot in the auditor-client relationship. It is not my intent to say anything disparaging about our present auditors. I feel that for the fee the City pays Council is getting reasonable service. A change in auditors would probably involve higher costs, part of which are "start up' costs. I would recommend that Council consider selecting a different auditor. If Council desires to proceed toward selection of a different auditor, I would recommend that request for proposals be drawn up and the primary selection criteria be based on qualification, not price. One technique that Council may want to consider is the establishment of an audit committee. GV/ljw t �\ 11 r MEMO TO: John Anderson City Administrator 134 - FROM: H. R. Spurrier ff. -4 City Engineer RE: Assessment Hearings - A rust 11, 1981 DATE: July 31, 1981 Introduction: City Council will hold public hearings for three (3) Special Improvement Districts August 11, 1981. To date, there have been some questions of benefit by property owners, but most of the questions have simply been in regards to the amount. Most callers are surprised to learn how much lower the VIP Interceptor and Hauer Lateral Assessments are. There are still matters of assessment policy to address for Holmes Street. Background: HOLMES STREET RECONSTRUCTION - It was the Engineer's recommendation, the recommendation of the Holmes Street Ad Hoc Committee and the desire of City Council to replace water and sewer services on Holmes Street in advance of road reconstruction. All water services were uncovered and examined during construction. Numerous sewer services were found deficient or near failure and all sewer services were replaced. On the other hand, water services were found in excellent condition and were not replaced. At the public hearing that ordered this project, property owners were advised that they would be assessed $175.00 for water service replacement and $175.00 for sewer service replacement. The actual bid price exceeded this amount. The total cost of sewer recon- struction and service line replacement is $145,430.00. In all of the project budgets, 100 percent of the funding was from the Sewer Fund and not Special Assessment because there may be some difficulty proving "benefit" and, therefore, the project budget would represent the absolute "worst case". According to several appraisals, the City may not be able to "prove benefit". In that case, the City could not assess the project for sewer services. John Anderson July 31, 1981 c Assessment Hearings - August 11, 1981 Page -2- The actual cost of services was $50,085.86. Of that, $20,012.77 was project related and a cost of the project. The balance, $30,01+3.09 is assessable benefit to the extent benefit can be shown. The assessment would be $522,05 to $588.57, per service if the actual cost were assessed. According to Chapter 1+29, the assess cost should not exceed the estimate by more than 25 percent. In that case, the assessment could be increased to $225.00 per lot. It is recommended that Council assess services at $225.00 per service for a total $12,375.00. The amount could be credited to the Sewer Fund. VIP INTERCEPTOR - The Engineering Department has received two (2) questions on the VIP assessment. One is a property in Killarney Hills Addition, questioning how the property could be served by the VIP. The question is valid. Because the "North half of Section 8 Lateral" did not identify a lateral which might serve this property and at the hearing William Price indicated there may be some parcels not served and adjustments should be made at the VIP assessment hearing. Staff recommends that the property owner be asked if reserve capacity in the VIP is desired (yes or no) . If no, the land should be excluded from the sewer service area and no assessment made. If yes, the assessment should be levied. The other property is house and vacant lot. Under present policy, both lots would have lateral benefit. The property owner accepts interceptor and trunk benefit but maintains that there are no plans to ever develop the adjacent lot and that the property owner would even legally join the two lots, so that only one lateral assessment is made. No other similar circumstances were found in the assessment area. The two lots are large and could be developed in the future unless prior arrangements are made. The assessment with two frontages is a total $8,791.58. The assessment with one frontage is $1+,683.1+2, and the front foot cost is increased by $0.27 per front foot. Staff has no recommendation. HAUER TRAIL LATERALS - No questions have come up. The assessment method is unchanged from the original hearings. • / ''d Cn N < ^ c+ i G,: W p(i) W c-I Cl) W t-' wwCn N C (D 'C N w CD d H CD W o K 'C m 7S" CO C I C.---..-- -..-.._-__....." .•••••• Oq w W N (D 1/4n 4:- H W Q P' 0 H 'LI trJ C7 w R. 'c' x x 'ri x R. `d w ''i 'd tom' R. (D w P (D w w 0 w CD P P 0 w O (D Oq CA � CA (D P (D a (D f I (D CAI CA M H P. ri p 4 0 (D ,• (D N ,. (D K. H (D d CD P ,i K 'l H 1-i (D w • 6a m z (� �55, r= �, 11 C) lD m O ' H H w 2 H by C) 0 (ea W w P P 2 W G ._1 vi Ir0 11 0 (D) v, H. vi H H v, H ^y ‘..ii CD VI Ro . H U, v in v? w H N1 W tri CD H W W 0 W d W N H -.1 H' Cl) —1 -1 J4 -J H \O H 0 \o \O \O (D VO <1 0 c0 PH. • -.s H a (U Z ` R, MINIM SO i CD ap Cl) • C,) m Cl) 'd til 'd Ro Vi U) C) 'd y CA 'd 2 CA 'd t-' B O �-K • • t.J 0• N O tri W O I H 1 i'! H C) -) -.1 N) N v, H -J CO O CA til (D .- CDH '-" •• W 1O 1/4.71 'Z N NI NN-' ri-H 1/4c) 1/4r) OD • • W NI '''`51 ,, I'. • . r,.-, (D • n-. N • ri--. (, H N \O c+ N \O td 2 4 0 \n C) 0 C) c+ to LTJ \O rt.-. N -•. 0 0 0 c+ 0 -.n {. CA O rim (7 --4 0 k 1 ti Cl) H H co(D 'd C) •O H W 1 H H 1 tom- • NN EA vt Fd N VO • H OD • 12 tt C/) O ctf --; N • -P-- 'C 4 CAH � im r-3 td () N • N - ON • td d t7 H O V 1to 0 c: OD c+ CA c I- Hcn (D I-33 xi N m td Ci) 70, (1) td C) 5C t=1 - O 0 O I-t N (Kn H 11 H n Oq `� k U 'd 1-h 'd -1 H .i./ CO• OH NOD H NOD H Is co to N.) co tdtt.1 NCD CAx C H r"- N) N 0 -J N J N til i I 2 H I H - I H -P I H \J I H C) I I-' H Ni H H R. VO H \O H --1 'O H 4 - C) 1/4.11 H CI) 0 \O H W O\ • ,•••v1 CJD , 0 ‘.n8 0 vi H 0 vi • 0 0 vt 'i 0 \..71 OD NI OD OD OD H H K CO • Cu I O Rd 0 N I N W I N D7 I N W H • I N \O' I N • N 7:4N W H VI N �n N PL. vt N N v, N N VIN H H Cl) -J P. N co N) N c+ • 0 N • Cl) N ' • OD d -' •P" M -- 0 - H .P- ODU H -4 O • (D O • W O H 8 O • OD 0 - H•O • • 'n W I OD 0 I • I -3 Ni I I . . N) I COd .__„'z / 0 kr - 0 N) • 0 O 4 0 --I I--' 0 \O (D M 1T1 .N H O •-.1 0 t+ t11 t - H VO H H- t'1 m N c-- 0 H. Cb J• :t- '-O o .. H y • v1 w 0 C.0I I 0 0 K O (0 O K O i N 3 1O 0 0c Ocn OCD OCD m 0 , in Cl) vi -4 N -- tC4.1.) 0 172 I-5 0 0 O' I CA i w 0 1 0 I cj _ G., 0 •,., �Z 0�-4 1 I H (1° )s 0 I IA rn tot w 1 Ztn . ,, a ", - ..., (,` w I •C00 0 1--, r vl k ;, ' , ti • raj" • P , . .. . , ... ..... . 4„..... . , , , ,. .� OO O . ! „:1 Cn N 7c1 CD R° vi U] W L Cl) NCl N ,., . (moo , 0 CD ' CCoti•� I CD ' vUi CD p VI x i) O '1 0 < C (i) N Fd x c+ ''d h F'• P 'd x Fi 0 !-+> O Pi • (D P (D P 1-1 0 • 0 PR° (�D p K ((O p R i; O (D 1✓ R. (D C UI (D a O M D ..( (D H• C ((DD t) (1) 0 J y Ott R. 11 'i 0 (D ''i (D Cr) H --4 ,I kW H R. d ' '-b ,Oi P Pt P W M ri-, VI H (D VI H !CD tri yP I~-' M '.n • ,-1 \J1 Co C W ,--$ OA `G W (+VI W hi W tzl -O n- CD P --J c + 1 H R. -4 H PJ N (D d �D �O C \o 4 0 W H • R (D P' Z d H rn CD JO CD D _I_•.. V Ci r C') 01 m CP V) \jib H R. tt.i ••� o HO cw +TJL 'dlEi r'- O ri-`O m o \O ti • H' . 0 hi 0 ti • z:-1--, OD _ 0 N CD'i-, N Cl) rvi� HV rvi� • tt Cr) ti c+ � H W t'j hi V V Co c+ O V to cC \.n tri Co \D ti H (D 'J=- F'• N LTJ UI -r-t-, hi 0 r'- -n 'i 'v r,-- x C c+ P H Ui C] Ui to 0 P R.01 0 -4 H• Co • 0 W -4 CD tii tri G • d Co'.o co • O �' CO (op arlCD L' CC!) td -1 (D O' • O AO 0 /70 H t=J tr. • 0 OR y I-' c� H H' H 1-5 O c vi Q 01 O H W - H • H• O H c+ O (D O vi m V0 !U 0 I O 'TJ (D c+ `d c+ N 0) I--' 4 c+ P' P, N - I O ci O O (D n �C. m O bi kO F-- U R° Lt • ((DD 0 W w - '- n W'. C1, k r'-,\O Cil OD hl (D U) Ul P hJ ♦ • U) P• Oci ti a -1 H 3, CD H• k bI Co,. Cl til hi 'i NODI O NCoc+ • p NOoi hi NCo H NCo H O P m -J W M -J H. '-i -moi ri-,CI) 1 H O\ -J 0 1- H. I H N I H O • C) I H F-' 1 H 0 I H N O\ Z H \O H c+ H Z \O H d W (D VO H Cr \O H N R. \O H •. — O Ul 0 \O h 0 vi '-O H 0 vi +N•. 0 v-, .. 0 Ul R. t„ CD OD td Co ' 1 Co D Co Cil P N W \O Cl I N k 7> I N --- I N Co I N c+ vi N (D .. 0 v1 N • R. P• Ui N • Ut N E H 'u N (D NOti '1 N N N N H• CO W H ''i 70 - Ul • - N • hj • H vi H - W C) --' OD H• P O • •• N -P'0 k W - W 0 OD (D 0 H C H --I I •• O\ r+ 1 • •• N1 • 0 1 • • (D to / O Ut co ,, 0 OD -4 0 0 -....1 -.1 0 OD • Co 0 Cp Co \ N �l N H '..Ii • -P H 'O �� i-,1 I--' 'O '_- H • N Fl, -r- !U N -4 O\ VI i-1-i-1- CU tri m I i M O W 0 0 c+ o o O 0 0 0 0 0 m -4 0 ''''--- - 0ro -I t V I ( ) C/) —o j MI 0C) ' 0) 0 0" i �Z CO 01 H )10 -0 0 N —____ !N (D (I) (./.\ 0 0 tol on Ed U , ? o Co M 0 i '''\ kik A _ I,- 0 0 I NI . 7 ...,,.,, . - lenstimmoirr.An , 'd Co w H I Co w E co C 7': t' Co w ci Cr. w P H O H Cl 0 H. o (D o O O 04 P `��7 a P H 6 H. W --� co X co E . (D r J O N H' 7�" W 's H \D (D w N• w 'd ;r' p 'n P.x ) 'J x F�, 'd x 'd x (D X RR (D P) O ( R' (D ( (D p r y O (D (D O' r (D Ro (D >ti O H) (D U) , Cu Rs tU 4 (D ,. (C O 'i 'i K O +.• 'i -.,+ ': M H. 7 cy 1- • K IH 'Y h fv rD !b H ( 0 P% w VI H \l H' \.n r- 0 \ Vl H ,`,' \11 H Vl Vl ' - 1 c VI (D \J1 W (D W H. W H (D W 1-• W i ---1 H. - c+ -J 'i ] _ H - co --1 VO R., c+ \D P. • I p 'C AO 0 (D tJ -. p' J, ,,' . . • vl - V RC1 I. GMW ` 1) COA v, m Cn NI-, 'dH -P 'd N '17 y 'd tUNO\ ''J '"' CD B w 0 ,. H _p-- 0 (D H 0 � m .p-.p---- 0 0 0 O) H o o pq ON 1 �) - • N) 1J . • H N hi H N n \O • CA VI --) Cl) H W H Cl) Co 0 Cl) --I \J-1 C) H 0 ON ON L. 0 E F-' H H :.- \J-1W \J1 -1" • '-J -n 4 \JI rI-, r'l-, V1 4 1-- r,' ri- - - �-, C \ft N ,. - .- O U. c+ ---. It, H N co (- H y Z C Cy td O t=7 H N tr. O td c+ 1 t'i V 'b t=1 21 Cr. �1 r1--1 N r'-, r. 0 rim r--• Co -. N 'd -, 0 �- '1 HU) r. O O O C) H CD • 000\ tz1 0 CD I-' ! C) \JD • Co H 0 -„ 0 ON CO 1,...1 0 CD 0 0 H O N O\ H • - OR •, a" .fi' O :.s' H C H 4, '�^ • V • o VI UJ O • H • r� CV! Ul H O ON VI H vn Cl) �- H. • N) a C-i t=7 01 (.-I- 0 N f O\ '. .J" Vl 0 n1 -i c+ 0' 1 ct O H' H -+ �� H O N U) 0 in O N H O • 1 O N) O O\ H C ) H CD t.--.! c ;3 n H m N • 'd v1 \ w C 'J 00 VI H 0 0 t;,' ')I-') O\V- --) H O\ XI ',:d 0 • (D Hi V OD 0 • —7 O 'd O H — td -- N I Cq ` ) (:.r. O 7 N co cr. op O I-' .I t-1 vl 0 \11 • O\ t \ 1 N \n • t cl . N Co 0 N Co U) H) N '• N co 0 N Co N • 0 N Co W•. \n ® L' r -� It --4 tri f-' CD H '-', -J • \O ') --4 VI Z H HI I N Cl) W O I H co I N Q•ln I H \O H CJ) \O I-' h' tri I -. 'i \O H txj U) \O F--, --.1 H 4D H c+ H HI - 0V� tH� 0 \/I \.11 0 0 V t=i 0 V c+ c+ 0 \n 0 0 •H 03 H Co 0 () H . Co H op Cl) O • Co N H. rr I N H O I N • 0 W H 1 N) \ I O I N tai I N t:d O [-� \.,n ND - 0 V1 N) VII-i I - NJ V1 N) N) 0 Vi N ,1 0-' N N Vl co N • 'i N --. . 0 • Ni • 'i N I-' • 0 N O4 • Ni A) H .-",. H' O -0 -P' H' V I-- 0 H• H • -C- O/ W --- I,. • co - N (.,J '• H :-. W co • S W ! C D I IC).) H 4 C, I • _-. I . • (N I V� O 0 v (D VI tr7 O -- 0 v W 0 W 'i VI AO Cl) \n U7. -1 tc vn N �• CT,vJ L•1 � m 0 H H ON CX) VI O\ II O I I c+ I 0 0 o O X 0 0 O R „: O O 4 0 0 0 U m ii :i : 0 .� C,) --I 741 0. ®o co 41 0 CD -_ CO _0 vs til m i10 cel4. Z `n Ij (A) CIO u1 4,.t) . u•) 09 C_ 0 U O 0 p 1_' — ___ 0 U1. (...nV� ul 01 E .. 7 l `j ' Ci) O N CO WO (OD CJ) W U) tTi U)) LA) x a) 1 H 1 \0 hi (D o po Co I-1 h7 `s h7 w (D h7 .'r 0 P h7 7. o0 m R. m m 0 Pa pp,' CD rn 0 ro cD U) I-1 P. (D p 1-h '1 7 Il - K c+ CD ''i H � Hcc+ f3N m CD E3 -4 P H P P -H O Re N• /- LC F'' O Ro ‘..nl H C V-1t H 0 V1 I f CJ) VI H H CJI CD v; g, V7 W LA) W ' W H. LA) Imo-' -4 �O^I 04 ',I -4 �O (D H H. 0 0 u O s (D ` Z m V Co H D '� V m, C^^ CP x • N `" `V c+ H 'J U) c+ 'T) H c+ -.'T1 B ON W CD 0 0 L.-xi 0 0 t=J O 0 0 0 O m O -,I -4 U) (D .(D U) O O U) vi O O Cn -J F 04 -� R. CO td --4 td .....4 0 0. V • .c, CT r,-, r;-, r1 C!) ' ' -4 ' ' vi '- :r Ott k U) til cf tri td t J tzj tDj H t,1 T 0 O rim c+ r; • N) rr� H I� .--1O N O� VI -4 0 TJ O g to COO O O• _ Vt nl Co W 4 H .04 ((DD • c+ In CD r,� 0 0 • H R� O 0 V? a 04 O . O b m H � '� o ND . HO 0 OX4 CD " Hi T ri-• ) H H CJ). -I XI - r C) tO . • H \' 0 0 •'9 n t=J 04 N Cn - . �i y H36) H ND Co ri-.H N � • � N.) CO Vi 0 N Co • 0 N.) CO V U) I H t -J \O --.1 -I N H M ---1H) - I ti Z O r I H co I H H O I H • N I H -Pt=1 " VD H • \D H H I-- `,O H - H H \0 H U) \O H 1 0 VI O\ O VI •4 0 \n vt 'O 0 O Vt t=1 O vi H \.n Cl) I N) IS N) -P CD I N V VI (D IS N 0 I N 0 --I 13 VI N X vi N �' V, N U) ' VI N 0 Vi N • N N ' 0 N tri c+ N N 'i N) ‘..nV MO H N H 0 H 0 0 H N" H 1 ''' W -' LA) U) 'I W • H M W Co (,J • I • I • 4 1 O\ O `CI I • I LJ 0 CD W 0 '31 0 Co 0 t=J 0 VI -4 0 vt i H VI VI CG Vt VI Vi • Ni - Co VI -U I-' W - 't W ,• C7, \O H m II I vi I 1 O 0 O 0 0 0 0(,v m �- _ -1 C7 CP --1 ' 7I n O„ I ao >2 CO 0-4 O 1 I H w W uk) W Uv O C? G O 0 Y Ifi --- n rti b CA di tot ro 61 M K CD Vt ,, tt 1 Gri `) j op C) 0' a p - oco �" �y OAOA OA • C d CnwU] v c: wHJ CDoH � oK • P O' oP-' cr • �' oH o a (0 x x o N COAD --° o V7 W '� .^-, frn ° x 0 F� o (D �i P (D c x ((DD C £ K o 't 'i '1 -- HP n H0 HO F-3N• P. N ' \..nvi H R. I O v H' O w o vi 0 \ i X 4 FO-' - p -w-1 ((Cri H `D cD w ! c+ "o 't '0 0 0 'i U.) P, P. () P. Z C" MI from 440 a)) I-' m ' - tHzi 0 0 0 0 0 m H w _ ocU, HHoff Cn �cn nocn 1-' CTJno -•� , \n $ -� f: o z rim • r'-• ,. • rim n r'� /V CI. V1 C I...) Vl c+ VI -P' Q O } I-3 z 0 Il td 0 r'1 c td O c+ t=i c- tri • tri "I -' O r'--• O ri--, tid 0 r'-, ri-, (D 'd C) 04 '-d a 0 O./ • 0 0 • -:-) 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 E x, tt5 tl' 5 • by5 bis N --" 5 G\ V1 O �7 CO O\ O cn O\ O\ r-- 0 0 cHr� � O H k.0 N.) vi "V H • /-- ',n H • F-' • c+. • t1 m 0 s...11 , \J1 \J1 Vi 0 Vi O -J — H n ti 21 0 _ O 0) .9 t-, VI =� • V, O w t=i0cn ...1 t-+ D 0) -) 0 N OJ O' '--b ND CO -4 O N CO U) O N CO H' bi O 0 9 r I ♦n o� b Z LH Hy I I--'' '. U) I I-' CO I H I I-' CO O t� � kO H t1 til k.O H Cr) Q H H' O) \O H., • z ii .^ O ' 0 Vi tH) 0 VI VI H 0 VI w tri ct Y ✓.{ (7\() co H co 0 co Vi • H I N O I N N O I N 0 0I N ,. CD I N N Cl)N 0 0l'i NH . !i Vt N 0 O V1 N 0 VI N c+ 0 O, H N w VO�. N '-i N) co li N 0 0 0 XI 1.0 H H r.). H H tJ. H • H O I • w U.) `? 1 . t� =1 co I w H CO • I • td --.1U, VI Vi --' �O �" N 'OVwi H, .C- VOi Off' VOiN0 VI� v 'y m O\ H 1 OD CO VI -J '0 -0 -1 N I i • \n I0 ` I O Vt I � I 0 00 0 • --H 0 0 �V) 0 --J0 m \n 1 J _ :14; v cn —I ' n 0 —♦ „ • 0o >zco i a frlH • c> o o 0tn W — -010-1, cri P z ---e CD --f'''. $.- . P, ! via 6-, c ) r co kil b ' di �t IDa. tn 00 ...f" —F .ar 411111211114tg) . PD cn PT) CA p7 0 o o ow DoH Lo moo • z (D pG- c+ H v c+ CD r O\ N CD C H. U O CD H O (D K 0 P 0 U 0 H 0 o\ h7 N• h7 c+ `d x K hD b x h7 x R. (D N by CD N (D P P• (D X .-- P td (D P1 x R. CD N R" JD CD (D . 0 n N (D CD K H OH ' H C H FO-' (n 0 K t K H) K H. K H. -4 H P% 0 P/ P (D P P Ro F-'• (D \1 N• R. H. K H. Vt Vt trj \n \-,1 H V I H v, H bi V1 Vl P, \.' J td J 'Z+ VI R° VI p -4 (D -4 CD 'C cd 1 + - -4 P. \O H. K �O n c+ c• `� 0 ] PP Z H. m 70 NO ac H CO U) T co o, Ul H O 1-' O H 1 U) ,T)t CIS CJ B zi t=� (DO o0 00 P UI �. T ri- - n 0 K 0 K O rim K -O rn CD . - - • - o J O H ] 1 Hk U8 V 8 tF- o . —4 O t N. CO rim ,. -J .ri- H H H H Cn H O O 0 \n O -3 O 0 t1 M ,.. "n O O R. - - \il - - t1 ri-� -4 - -4 H t1 NJ P. -. H• --1 H. k Vl H CD b \J100 v 4 H 0N0• H 70 APs H � � • CO (J) cn ri-. r_ rt-, \ 1 O\ m H O c+ W .P- 0 N t' P tI1 O A - 4 t I -4 O •cf f1 UI T CIS C) ti- ri • r 74 V1 - N EN n c+ 0 \- a 0 Vi k O O -4 tU1 M • N 0 O c+ O H O td UI NOD 0 Ng N 0) OD c+ � NC N O 7 CoDu 0 OD 0 O > r- -4 -4 t+ 0 -4 -4 0 • -1 -4 o -4 c+ r-b Z t-1 I H Fes• - I H • I H I H W I H - I I-, O Cr) U] VO H VO I-1 \O H W O\ \O H (D O\ VO H V.:. H tnl cn Magma ..d 0 V (D V1p4 O UI 8 OH O V1 (D 0 OV1O VI 8 O VI W W CO 0 OD 04 H Co • H CD Co (D H I N H I N --I I N I N • I N H I N P4 V1 CD '.0 V1 N Vi V1 N) • VI N VI VI N Vl V1 N VI VI N • 0 0 N 0 N V1 f\) - N - N O N • K 70 H - H - H H H H V1.. O W • W U) • `� w • W V W -3 I W H• I • f' I w 1 W I . — I . O -Pd OW Ovi 0 0 V 0 OW - OW O\ O\ t-- o O\ '+) o\ H) o\ o\ O\Vl D\ 'h 0 H I m Cr) 1CO Ul I O r- 0 O 0 t� 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 m I - 1 —I r --I 70 O,. p® co • O it 1 RI D hd C> O 0 Com' 0 o in \ QV ,!`\ v cI\ 01‘ 311 Chi i -11 0 - i a -"fh --- -e -4- \ OA 00 tAJ (A] _0? I (..,A3 (Jo ,N1-1 cy Q o 1 0 0 Q o u 01 (Sl > I - CAUt -� -.- --\ , t ,:. .:i,, ,.,, ..., .. . . .,, 'Z1 U) tI] c.-A U) W J U) 71 O P O U) O O 0 poi' O H (D r� c+ ((DD CD 0 4 i-% cc+ 6' —4 ., CCD CD P CZ' 'dx H 'd(D 00 O � C F 0X CD Z( D CCD+ uN Ro Y (n >C ¢ O =y P H I-• (D FL'•� R. 0 c+ V HVil W P O WW � U) VO CD N. 0 \" t In Z ni NO c ,T, C,) CO) `T^ V I I \J1 c+ tov) hd H Cf) QC/) 3 .O 0N ---. H 0 T W N I-' - N • H Y 04 • SC O U) 0 uv 0 0 t � tt=1 —n r,, Cntri • vt H • --- H O tj �, o ri- k 4F-' W . XiH v I (Nr : � NOt1 A H T U] tnl c+ co O -J 70 tTJ O Ovl NI J �+ c+ 0 1 El 3D N W N I-' O N k N p 0 0 r L-.1 -,1 �n bd tri ) H --J W Z 1-H 'd I I-, N I N \ 1 I h-' CD '71 \O H \O I-' U) C] \O I-, O \O IJ Ott O O o � ttn7G 0CD'U) 0 0 - 0 v1 • W F-' 0.I N • I N H • I N I-'• I N 5 ' '0 \..51 N v1 N H'. `n N \n N N • N N N N N ti F Co • U) IJ U] N H O -I 0 \O F" W E W • vt 0 I 'if I • • CO I • t'-' I W 0 M r) \O :L. O .-) N N O W C) .t-' ,. O 0 \O •F'�I rri tV T 1 0 I I r'-' I O 0 .O 0 0 O 0 0 0 m .-.r. 0 , ._— ,,,,1 I GO IV n ; o 70 p4 Z coo �� N W tat a) W _ — d 4/1"1 VI W ,-t CD © 6l X (A) + * Z vi CO Co O 0 o -L4 8 0 v� In cy -es T • • P !J p P Q _ i0 40 O o o 0 Vri i.i\l H N . . (Ivi c'' (N 0 Ci N C i- 1)- - v O Z a) �^ a'7., MA 7-, , ',..1 I-\ ,,, 0 -,-) no , 0 8 i G 0 i ,...„ I a) a) ‘--7 a) - ', a) \i I ' v U" M v ) �' f VI o cn U • m U cry W W r�� U� LA �' /(-`�� ,1 f" �: ( U� Cil : (-Ni • (\,/ i W in ZQ 1-, u. CC) o I-- 0 _ H -- I-- n CO Q W a X Q 41 F-i C FIH W C7 C.) H 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 • 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E ,, 1 1 I I 1 I I I co c„ __1- cn o ;-� rn W ,i, X; M _? .- it\ N J W 1 I 1 I I I I I O u H U) O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 •i , O 0 00 0 00 0 O 0 00 N- O , 0 0 U 0 0 O Q- a H r-, H H H H H H o E (Y W O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 H U 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O\.0 -�•• CO I I I I I . I I 1 i=7 Z Z I— r- N l N- t-- • 0 b P N N N N N N N N QU ✓ W ` H CO c' CC U) Q) W Gr, w ,�,, h • o- . w 0 CL. .:.-1 a. w H C) cn r)) _ r -1) Cf) v [ + F-a 0 ;. D C O 01 �� C�� Q 3 W u] n - -P v v OI i7 -7 fl U F i --2 0 O c0 o. c0 C C\ 0 F--7 .- 4-. y, f•, 10 _ 0 - 0 C u H N IC) v • N 0 0 W aI H '-o I If\ U) U) -- (r) H CT U E i ` ) - - GI ,W U) V/ a: i-, N cd v c, 4-) 0 cd �i cd •• �- r-1 H v H •.-i N 0 ,-,� 0 Cl.) OC D\ M .3 3 S ON W C-- H in cd cn I� Z M � � .. cd �^� '.62\'''. \\ if\ • U - S~ tI� 0 >~ N 7) H x +� Q3 O >, (I) O •r1 € S-, t~ U +� 70, 0 3 z d � v >~ riC) rJ ? �I c, �J O mO a a� n a xvoC°� x m W • 0 v I ,� �, • ca v O O O. O a7 0 O 0 -I o O P+ bcnM 0 r HO v Cf) (I) ox +' •• � 0 > �o K o Cr) �� • >,�, o u M EA CO cjM O N 5--, d t'1 HN •iH OHN Cl d 0 N ^a U] -1 rJ W cel r_..) H _,. GO Z M H M 0 Q COP • Q Q O F. ...1 R 0 8 O �(� ‘41Ti 47 N o- ___I N. [\J I-\' Z O 0 0 P O + 0 S $-.1 :4 CIW in u) \ '''/ p Cn �� u) 0 tp (T" 10 W In z c� 0 � N N 01 Cr) � u) (' Cn ( '.3 u) f`J C) F �W • 1 0ZQ 00- atO I 'O — I (j Ii Q H „, • in u) OC , Q I w xO 0 O O O O U.) ,, O 0 0 O 0 0 0 i E H I I I I I 1 , + N <-4 N N U.11 H N \,0 %,,,,) `-0 \D 1 11; -1 --1 If\ If\ Ifl j hl I I I I i I O H j 0 0 0 0 0 0 v 0 0 0 0 0 0 y, I 1:1 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) Ce 1-0 , jP� 0 W H H H 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 4-1 C() I I 1 I 1 1 0 N- H Z 2 w N C) N N N N.-ic _J HI, 0 z IH IS 0 a1 W v H N +) U v, Q P. - �ti was i to CI w u) W q 0 U. o o \.D , m 0 i 0 0 • O ,1 1 _ a ', 0 tl : r, ,-7 '0 CD C•'1 N CD CI-A'4 i 1 ;+1 1P C- r-"0 N- 0 - ' Cl) - - - •H Cf] 0 �— w H "o CO U) yID +-s w o a, 0 0 1 0 1 0 I • 1 o •d ' � CO CO - H r1 .....t• i 7. ..7 CI] t0 41 Cl) ( `(I, v w (i) CO Q • o cd co +- 00 C) Cd c3 CO 0 Pa 0 N H 0 q cH ) N + oc a) a+ + m m W '4 i-1 ;3 3 W LC\ Z Ul (1) 0 Cl.) a) 0 Lfl $. • 0 o a) e v 0 a z cc a a) Q Lr\ r Y 0 HC=1 r{ N 0 N 0 0 • Pa) 0 _C -+ 0 0 /) N G o W0 x 1 c x Cd rd +'' 0 (1) cd CC 0 op F-1-t H.-.- .0'.0 0 Ty 0 •'- t1Q 0 :+ O a> N H )) 00 0 00Pf-� d O H i :.1 HM ;au, -., _ . • 0 C\I 0 0 00 ...J 0 Of) 0 CP 0—. el 10_ i Ct- t )-• 0 0 (_)1 (Th ..._./ Pi .0 r— •- . 0 0 ai 0 z ,_, ;.., Is'(N) , c - (....) :. ;.: f) v• co . , (Do a, , (.1. to J r\(QV ril Lao •f c\I .:, ,) •r.,0 .... - VI • q .0 • i ,-. " •t 4 A-, (Y-- m • 0 , :I -.. id— o ,s1 ,,: k .... (1 -_) cnt I . • cc) I LSI c0 Z Zi 0 1- cc 0 I"0 LI r ce I-1 i'"m'' .-• 01 ! i-I iLi CI t--1 'CD Ce < I ''' 1--. 1 C `:•'; • U.J , c , o c"\ C) Lr\E ;1- , 1 0 I LCD\ I I ,i- 0 I 0 I (7)\ 0 I 0 UJ -. - 4---i 1 al N C ,.0 \0 ,-3 > :r..4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 -') - 0 0 0 0 0 r , 0 0 ,-.. . 0 0 0 0 ,_) 0 0 -; t ; I I I I I ci... ,- - ,.,.. c_.) i_..1 _ H H H H H i E p. ,-,.., 0 0 0 0 0 .. . 0 0 0 0 0 -- ;, (,) III I o H tl. ,_ N_ N_ N_ 1. F i ,..; z H (\.1 0.1 al N N ,,,.....1 HH4 0 ,1 1 '''w .:-..-. /". 0 i 1/4.1 • ' ' '' ..... , v 1--1 •• :--- t. • ,-4 c, '- '4 CL j Li r: U.; --- :) C,') ---• 0 u". „).) 4 1 ,-, 4 t •--1 CT, L.; (.',.1 '1 0.) cc' a, i•1) !I•) ' :'•' rf I • ( ) •': 0 cr) . V) LU . (/) (/) . Cr . , , - cr) a oi c-i ,ii.; •H H 5-1 0 .- C!) P4 •.--1 C'i LA • •H .C;S: '.'. ,..., _n c, (I) V) ,:.:- '.: .•-' Ci V CO 0\ rd a) .-.) . _,_, • a) a) E • i., ---,-; ,- •1. r.-4 ,....1 40 0 (, •.1) • c.) 0 -:•5 o ,--1 t— --, t--- 0 \-0 •-, ..._.1,- Cl..) •H N --1 c,r) ...":: CD r., F,I, d cr) 40 . Ili t'. ... ::. , .. e . . 1; V gyp• 1iri4161 . *d7'Sr/i4::VASIL' tri'fValik' •.i.111010. •*1$ 4, ,777 i.,,,''''..., ".E•4 .. ' ,,'1. mo r P 0 0P 00 ( o - o o fl _L t.,.3 0 .i....00 ;ttri u) . "0 — 0 0 0 0 0 8 c.) ? .,... , . 0 . gin �, ,� � v Cul) �G a) • 1 r_V) '-- -- i — cd I 30 3 L ` a U) i cn C l•e ail ,.) rl I cn 01 . - ,t:, I . _ ______ . . _______________ I W QI J Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I I I 1 I I I 1 1 O1 .. O W .0 � j N. I I I ••EH E-, w o o o O o 0 0 00 '-0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ._a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •-!z z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OI 01 W ci) O O O O O O O O O 41i r, Z O I O o O O O O O O O 10 x r- r-. r, r\ r`r ; r U U _ ¢ N N N N N N N N N k - CI) jr-r W I v Z rill Z h M-+ P-, P+ ,`--, P. P. w L1, a., w 1 11 H "' H O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ) 11-. � o s E-4 - c> fri. -Q ..> - aX 0co co ch oN 0 0 0 0 1O Cr) ! ca • x �, o 0 CL7 Q \N \N I r I �ry 1 �" Ir "' I, �f' 1 I ..)IN rt, j a .D z .D cn ri .D V) .0 Z .-' z .-, Cl) O' Z ch v) - W ,. U) ) >r •, i U) , J EH ) I--1 \. ) 4J. .- c/) ; O 7 Cr.) cc U •.. !C H1 U1 7: 1Z CI 1 v ) cn 3 0 I 3 ro x u6 G2' . ' s+ X " sr I I U) 0 u .n H u a 0 •"� 0 Iqrn u) u 0 c ¢ E 0 E N ,-r (1) 4-1 .a x 0 — 0 H 0 ?, Cu) 0 m .0 cn m u) • O c.) O 0 UD O co ! ,,, 3 E • E 0 cc) :t E _G E ¢ 2 ") z E A E R 0 I E ,--4 .- a.. - _c r, o .-4 -0 • ›. ,-r co .--1 ca O 0 O +� O 7 O I O O O O +r O -+ x v x -� • 3 x x ca v) - (1) x u aC a) .tea > oo • rn .0 I •� .0 10 r tri ar I-1 in hD CD .� 0 ar o •.-+ N c cn 0 0 0 `Z-r-F-r 3 .0 G VD v; .-, x N. Z N. cL' N. cn N. ti N. .a N- 6 0.$ ,, :.�zi,�..','7r,,:i="4-7`.1: j,n.l .r. _7.. .,;�1 .,17.., ' :TI-7,7:7:,:.i]L,. :.;.:7:. : 47:77717:727/Zi' Cks::d,'1�1.n..d.c. 41 Ul - tJ t1 N iv0 0 n --;-, O O 0 0 0 0 3 0. Un �; A'-' l,� NI N �� j A:'- �� 1 (13 cd cd cd cd U) CO U) CI) U) CO U) }1 1 W 0 �0 C •Z Q 0/- CC 0 "0 " 1 v I 1 oc _� (n r7 ® Q C E H 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 H I 1 H I I I I I I H �O r-1 N-- CT - CO C— O\ H w Y O\ O O1 O\ 0 0 0 H . L7 N- 0 U • C C N ( l CO CC) CO CO ® t i I C) O • l 1 I I I I 1 r4 �3 O N Cl) Z H O O O O 0 0 •i �J 0 N O O 0 O O O 0 Z O (f.-it 0 ;: 0 0 4-1 0 0 0 0 • ce 0 u1 CO 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 Q. 1 I F. I I 4. I I i I m EU N. N O 4y-'{ H 1 O H H H H ^ U O O�rH H O O - 0 0 0 00 CI) I 1 ^ 1 I CO I I I I C) O W zP-I N- N- 0 • N- N- Cr) C-- N- N- N- N • H 4 N O N O N N CO N N CO • J i-4 H 0 '- H CO Q 0 a - Z P-, H O W O 4, V 0 a H cci 0 +> 0 u\ W Cf) H V H U) cd N- 3 - ‘..14' q (14 a) O • w P-1 O P, C•, P, CL O P: i H •• ) Cl) CD GO CIU) C ..7 0 < O U a) aO 0 0 0 0 co( ® cd • x C Pa Z c�t O H Q PI ce `- 1 01 CO ) C) +) C1 Cr) 0 ( ) '' �i=) ) . a)O •. H NI - 4.)0 0 � P; CO H Irl O 0 rI � i.-1 H t, C— (n Cl) (.) xHN- N- - I— CO co I-) U) >I 0 0 N Cd 0 4-I 0 4-. 0 0 0 4- I—) H ix 3 .>r.' C-- In H 0 H 0 H H • H 0 41 W a) �nw CO CO 0 _ 0 0 E•— F=7 E - H co H - - - H H H • a) H 0 0 H O r 0 • C E 1 I N H O 40 x N N M�O H N- i L(N • ink�p F-I wa C 0 I N \ a) H H I I I I I SS I 0 C 0 (n aHCO r-, P-, mHw Hm HZ rnz ON in w Cr) z0 CO C!) W co a c, Q) H d x W CT N- 0 cn s • LIN I I-, a) x b Q 3U 4-) •ri a) •- O ^~ a3 O H U) r, C') r n U] • Lu) O In • U a) a) i :d a) ,, X a) P, C) , 4-+ O C) x E C) u) a) H • +) O H r-1 H x o x rd H — o c), c o o U U o o if\ v) u� cd .-i i n c3 I - in r-1 +) O y)\D 4D O .-I- .-C a) c,-) c"r 0-1 I • O H u'V cd 01 cd N al CO cr) 1 cC CI) l': 't": _L1 riD :7 G\ C CO X CO P, 0 0 O p , (NI N N (I Ni,... P 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 p - + © s, ,, - ., �, p v1 a) �{ U Z : ) ei ��z ( - 1.1.1 CD3 /-�� (A 0 U) l t/VI. ) l { co tI) Cf) U) U) (f) 1 r 1 yr > 1—0 C) Z Q 000 "0 kJ " ~ ce , rt / (iia Ni,1-1 COre- n 0 o , O - O O O O O - E L--2, 1 O 1 I I I I �� O H N w `J H ri • r 0 0 C7 a0 a)I 0)I 0 I [ 0I 0 ® 0 O O [ 0 HO O t� 0 Z O n r-I t 0 O 0 C) ,• 0 ur) t4 O O ..0 0 4 0 0 0 u, k. 0 CD 0" 0 a _ H O H a ri I - 0 0I EU OHO O O O CT O O O — - C) 1 - - I I I u) I N- I O W Z N- t— - C- t rU t— HZ—8 HO p-+ NU) CV CV N0 N N Q J -1 — " rU 4, d. O 0 .1 l R• 1�1 H cd H H U [-1 U /Y H 4 w CO H u H \.0 co 0 m +' Z In (-a Ii• 0 11• c".•-• Cl.) ,.. H u) C1.- O r.. W q U 4 ) -, r-I C;) - Cf) S, 4+ .; a) r 7) O ® O O 0 _s 0 U O C 0 cu 4) �1 C') C: :.1 cd :1 H U) H 10 - •,-1 n 1-H, cd a) H c/ R: 0 O Uai H ,-) . O N- tO H 0 () '-: - ,)t C— •• 101•1 , I ,i O 0 u_ O C) 0 4 0 03 VU O 1 4+ 4-+ [--4 (-) (0 CO LO CO (V +) C) .., F-) O 4, - O C-, O 4-+ N V - - C 1 H O O H C H 0 : . a-1 A a') H a) Cn - - - W E+ � �r4,�-i � I-- 3 C H E HIw W . - C) H O --<• • W 0 c, - ) I 4., 1 I CV•-,J }G k E �., U) F 1, U) O 'O Z \O co r-i Z 1 H W CV 4 CO w Q C.) .c; N OL -, W 0 .4 Z U Q 0C) in a) C o Ti ca o c.-) Cr a a) o r, o i c a O m o c, Q 0 cHd ,� •H u3 v x c3 C) rd 0 0 x 10 0) C7 E 0 • Cin CC) x 0 0 H co cd X a) .,-4 CC .•-• C) C ;ti a) F, N ^ 3 r) U O 3, OJ ,l-4 .7 40 Cri U � _1 co W GO C; rD C•c Q a :. . - 4.., T. J o o 0o p 10 � �� C C C . z 0D O 0 W VI P 0 S-, n S-8 0 h 3 {) `, - W a) L. 1 C Ul C l7) Cll v ,n co (J `r. (`) Y U. tel • l� cd (,+ ' ( `. CA (I) CIS C1) U) ,'1 1 W C) 1-co 2 v! ceQ U.o I— N. V x• CO c-.) Q W CI Cf) c ci 4 C C - W W O O 0 0 0 E- 0 0 0 I E I 1 I C� u� H NO UJ C7 0 0 en •r i I o O O O O N :�, ,.: 0 O 4` o .y I I ,- .? I I I ® 01 0 0 0 o ,r O r-.� 0 0 0 ,n O 0 0 C=1 N E2; H O o ,1 N (,) C, 0 4, 0 Z C CC 0 o O 0 0 o •r1 D— CJ IEI v-, In ., I I I O Hn 0 N O ,--iN N - N •ri 3 N 0 ,--1 S, O O� O [3 C,) C) 0 0,Ku C) 0 0 • 0 H �• ;,l {).j I I F, C') P, I I - I (ll 023 pi :LI-, z <i, [- f r i CO N- N- N C— C) . '-1 P-, N N 4-, cd NCV N P a, J ,•_._,) •-,.r ) M ;:l 4 ; ; •� n) , 4 c U f i w r{\..) 0 p 0 +� , . Ca ra3 cd 11/4.1 > v H C,.z• y C .-H _ .41 rr1 r-1 7 • O ('- H U) CV C 0 C) I (NJ +11 a. C) W Ca •H > c1 •-{ 0 CV C) C co ,1 u) 0 f a) a) r C. 4, u • C` -i c.. i c,_::)te) (!7 C) C'�, r) { a r,D oecd -I ,y - r--i CC ,-C o = :12' rc) 0 H •ri -P 1 H CCC _rt C) U C: N C') a3 :� •r-1 C) 0 ai ri f ) C4 C -= .'C .i y U) Cc) ', F-40 P, (.'1 'WI C) H - n Lc\ --1 Lil 023 LI:\ Cc) N 023 CO <L OD - .'-C N :-1 EH Cil C) 4-, N LC\ 3-, F-- :" H 3 0"1 • u, ci in C') n, ----.1' 'i •--I C C -1 N ._t N N 0 H P= c) ri 1 ) a r1 1 a U I rn O [: ci) 0 >4 N 'Pi a' I r-lCV 0 C) Or-us, N 3 E «'.r ,....1 Cy'1 W N ill =-+ <. N i--a cd N (1) r-1 W 0 c O. C OC C- W P z - 3 :� H O :: a) Cil x C) C) '3 0 „3 H V rn 1 C '1 (ll Cil .3 C) 4-1 .) El .-1 cd J 0 O r-H c= H > H J) r-I O O 0 0 C-- I'D O-4-. ::--. •-'11 a) ... z : z >, •r1 3 N 3 c0 S.. .:) cd 0 ,-i C0 (-JD -7 CJ\ .P 0\ O n W ` ,1..t • ;,,,,, V)..I.'.,-..).r.,,,, t*.,.. , . . 0 0 8 o o O 1 Cj c j (Ni (N) d _ 1._ /..) C) Iz 0 Q 0 0 0 0 O 0 v1 0 N - N N - a) N `//-�)' 1~i of in ,W a) 1) �_ • CJ CL) 1, ' �7 3- 3 J `" j ��I v) Cf) t r) 1 i C J1 Cl) { U) rn 71 co j Cl) c • ( i cd- cd C" ct3 (,14 @ .J C� 'oR ` j Cn C co CO m CD Cl) ' CD Ca . W co ZQ 0'- o:0 I- W Ce‘..../ _.-4_..� __—� LLN (1) Q W a CIC a Q CQ .---.� — W " E (0 0c 0 0 0 0 c� 0 0 q I I I I I I 0 1 1 W c N CO HNCO N- O Q1 C' H r( 4 H H - H H a I O 0 0 0 O 0 O\ 0 in 0 ® W I O I U O I I 0 - I O 4-)� 1 -t O HI I w 0 a0 O E-, 0 cd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LY H J 0 0 O� 0 0) O a O 3 0 0 O 0) O 0 0 0 0 0 0 C.7 I N I 1 +) I C') I 4-, I 4-, I 1 E N N N 0 N N 0 N 0 N N a o � 0 oa 0 °z 0 0 0 0 ., 0 H 0 0 0 0 - 0,-IN 0 0 �• I H I 1 4 1 I n I (J) I Z C- N- 0 C- N- N- N- N- JE-+ C0 0_ ;- N � ,O N N - N `� N W CJ ,.-'3 N N CC l: i,a M. • E: - C) - U L i U tX +3 (l) f„ u W Co H V C> a) - 4a H ' 0 i-I ,) o,- X X C.1 0 0 x 1,61 ,_t O :s 0 O W O W - r O 0 �J =7 iCl C O ,a n3 F=7 (1) a ,0 '-C ,3 '-O ,, r.. .r t ' �i - 08 , , P, f7 u\ /�j •I, CJ CO U • C7 .� C'• 4. _ i C", C7 LL. i , j,; .i.r ct .. „ :•,. O CO r-\ CO - ) 4-, .. �.d•.• I'-i C� J C. 0 .-CC 'i ;zl H (,) --, �� \ •r--1 LA \O \o 0 J C- \o O\ \D \O 1 I 1 +` 0 0 O - 4 `H r+ W •L F— ;C1 L, O •H CO 0 O c .---1 �O cd H CXR - - + N C �:,i Ei N 4 N 0 0 W - - H 0 H 0 O I -0 H 1 \D CD N- ON CO H CO -4-' I I [— W - C ,-1 CO C- I I >4 - I I 0 H �w Cl) N o23 023 N - C)) -4- z F t-- O\ F r-7 H x H U] CO CO 1 W (I) cc CN OC cd W O Z O 0I a) C) a) o rr. CI) C • a) > C: r=7 0 P + o i C a CD C) O 0 m •ri ,r) cn cd r...) n a a) H Cl) H N F, Q) 1J v O i~ v) �: )) N •H N 41 O E W E G.. E s~ E •H E E E a) E O Hr-+, H >>Hcd X '.l) H cd HH r-10 •3 H 2i O C O CO a 0 O d O 0 O H \D O O\ ,- N'- O C- -4 O\ '" r-� Q3 r-1 4D cd -4. cd Cr) .s•; "D 0 \D C Cl) 0 0) N cd t e Ov U CO O a Ov 0 O r7v C7 OV Cl. 1 _e 'e..r.'. . . fig. (y*;'•- •-..,t-..=. .. Irk, o 0 9 ,•J O J Q 0 J r Lia 0 0 - 0 Lu CD I 1 ( cn o 4,1 c, cn T (1-f_. t * 0,- W O 00 O O `/�\.5' ^_ 1/41 ( , _ H Cie rk1 - I— v' Q _) i7 W cv c H c co co C w E w 0 H 0 0 0 00 E-1 I I I W co CO o N ® �ti rcj I I I I I 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 CL cx PI Z o- I 0 r-I H 0 0 0 0 E �' w o 0 4� 0 r H1 I H H C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0• J o W Z rIN oI �' H Z 0 P.- N N Z N N CV N CZ 0a a rz -t.J a W ex 0 -) m n o U.) (0 Hs in H c H0 H Cl- Y W H NPA- 0 ( Q qQ . H 0 3 .8 N tat] U) rn W 00 Q c.D c- 0 0 0 ,i-) 0 �; 0 3 ® --i H - V) .8 j,. C11 ] 0VD R, co 0 1 H 1 1 I 1 o'I m (f) CO >-4 P-i \o X ' Cr\ Ifs rl CO c0 11 t;0 R�W H H C - N 4-4 C- 4i 5? 4---{ 0 H O H O W E-+. H I I 00 -.7' Ul 1.-INU\r10.1 0 EZ U) H H F. H to H Z H N- GD U) U) w ''_ U) 'I 0 CO C .� (i) H ed a, W Cd a) 30 to :r 0 0 Q 0 m a; s: a) 0 co a) aa)) H a) 21 E-1 U Cd y a) (N A e: Z CO d b Cz7 023 5-. .G 4-, a) -4--) E a) C) co N Cd 4-i CO .2 \O 0 rd O f-,-1 i Cd H 4H F...i •Hx 0x 03 VHi3 al H H U1 UCO I- U N N 4D (1) Ca r1 Cd CT Z H U N O N (N C, U 0\ • - hIL,0YI,:6 `.kit4!!'r/i 446, 'f'E# . ._,--f*--,,--.i L; 11441110011r. „140ftlitt . 1,. .d iw'F7 •,, 1 r1 i Q J O O r ry H N rd 1 d (1) -- cd s•-, N U P. I- • • cd a) Q) Z i_C Co ap N — a) — � - , r- g a 1_, w In ,y r r J 1" to c '. 1, , 6, i Q C-- r•- = I , �s r r• • —— --- H— I H H F— J H - H 1- I��� b . ZQ± 101-1 N N af. 1-l ON ,--- NO . Cn if-\ r ..0 _9- ol ri\ i Q Q rn ri rn N rt rn 6� a\ v • c._. i - 4" o L trr) - r o O �- 0\ In N N k )' — H I- -?, U.) 0 0 0 0 H r-1 Ct 1 i O O O O O O 0 , i'--;i 0 \.O 0 0 N N H r` _, 1 i 0 4_, 0 �- 0 LIN O 0 0 - 40 4 1 OI ^N L \ I - I 1 I O N) Jen E ' , w • a � O H 0 o23 O0 - Oe P' N r I N Lr\ N 3f'' 0 N N N O .Y = tr\ In Lr\ 0 H If\ y Lr\ W Lr\ Lf\ U) -P ! ,_7 I R: N I 0 4O I 0 I Z I t,j y1 00 0 co W a) 00 Lf\ CO LA tf\ - �, L, 0 W 0 N U) ,O H - 0 IN 0 0 0 -~0 X., ON o73 U) O\ U) 0\ 0 0\ W • O\ Lr\ O\ 0) 0 H - ' Z I a) l 4 0 I Cr) I 0\ I I M N • r-1 i 0 N O N N 0 0 0 N U) N N ) N C--- N 3 W Ii ,-d , f- • . - O U) • - i) fYi i s -i W N Lf\ W 0) SC W O r1`-1 1' O\ • 0 }q UN -V ;+ 11 H +3 Z d3 H. W 1.7 ./J cQ) I 0 �3 a, CD Z Z -, • _ • Y � ! • •; •H CV ONO (N CO O 0 <4 ONO - ‘-'• 0 H In • coN 1 r.) • 3 Lf\ H V0 W H U) O\U 3 V) (--) u CD ( ) W H 0 4 a\ 0 O\r11 1- t-i Ln i , • W Z W IS H 0 • .-zt,-+x • W - d i P-1 XI en N Cr) N ZZ N ZN U) 01N Z CO E— N ri r Nr3 • (N -' N N N N•-+.4. N i`. _ Lr\ Z-.7 Lr\ 10 01O H W Lr\•Z Lf\W L(\ZZ CO !;f H O • H r- H H Z H 3 H H r-I o I--1 40 H o-7 M H o H o H o W �) a) W W r.-IN �. y{ „ o — �1( m a Z, rn co w CO U) H `Z Lr\ a W U-N a Lr\ w (� 1) li 4 1 ‘::: r-,),, / cd 1 U f ' E-1 it IZ N S.. F 4-I U �� W Q.) CO 3 W H �r U O\ P rb rn Y4. 023 O\ Lf\ cd Cr) •ri r--1 N g c0 M 1 4D .7 •ri S;-, •F) C:-7 .Y I- In LfN in _4...., •,-1 Lr\ r'd�e11-1 a) cd t:1 • cd •Oi LIN O W Cd P Cd L 4 .:~ U - cd Fq Z N � U) r-- N W ,� • a) Z • 0 4-a •�- ,� cd v cn Z a W 0 O 0 4 icd P.4 x Pi a) a) O H rd H k', r-1 \ • 1- co co cAC 7O O m• Q O Ul cd O c,-, Ln 01 ,--1 •. NO cd cd Lf\ •r-i Cr) O O H +) cii a) I - O Pa O O p. .L~ ..7 P ti r) P, cd m 0 4D &-);: , I 1\0 M U) U r-1 P-, ra CJ N 7" H W 1 a -lt71.777-- .._...w.7 ._. •7ID4r•.=.7.=_. de.,a.�.o.:»cs.y.s._.�;�i.i+3ado.:*r•.i ,ix'Iit>G's '. cifzee. s eS of )x J t {may(,( Qr i. W ('.1 ..-,--,- y I ' v' N. szt a :7 COr UJ r 0 2 a �rX0 0I rr i / IA. 1 .,> co II.: co a ("{) c,-- ,,, ..,.. t-- Li Ice F-- o o c_ ; o : H r-4 ; d o 0 0 Lll 1 O 7 N OI • H N- ori i `1 0 • 4D O O O '> O - O • is N 0 f 1 I ;�N pq ri b0 cvl rI H O • \.O CY H ;c O N - a) N cal) N O pO 7 3 w 14 In - CO ,-I O oo ao w v o �- o E+ '--4 U O - 0 O O +' O W O k N- • ^ a- v s-- -' ,-a r 0\ r) l� rn \o 0\ cn • rn o . . \ 0 ,- r---1 oG Z <'''' NI `n� N H • ' ` i...,t - ti • uN 1! CHH N- 0 ti N- m c I O N 3 z N 5 • N O r-1 N O - N N 3 01 I(' t t H N — p~ � 00 3 - .— 0. O - .j .)] v pC H O - to Lr\ ) rn N W Li E V H U o W 3 • ^ Pa - cd N CO y rt 1` - - LU a) W N U) O H 0 W N- Ci S~ t- .4.-1 - T�� •R i 7. U),-,../, ^ a)�O N +, a) • !F 1 r W E co 0 w a� 3 - r-1 rn 1� cn ¢ • s� U) N u • 3 o u r .op d: V► N O -^ U T • ry ri t7( Ln {� 3 NP 0 u Y -i ¢ ! <a Cin 0 CO v Y`r j ,I , ,�; H 0 0 [� L!� 0 ^0 �D iS W CO 4� + is, �/ O t i C� N Cr) -• coom • - 0 H en• - H N• Lu ^ �N - `�� •�' i I '1 U) CO Z COWO N 9 p r( t� ` /j N ^ N ri - N -7 +' CV�tX N N,-Lx -N .. N H i.r N a N 3 - X s, N S ._ -- Lr' Z 0 Lr\ 0 Ln Cl)3 � N- 'aai Z tn W o in N Fd N? ow � N � 3 H 0 -- ,__1o pcc v- t . 3 I (f) CO w w CV CD 114 U) H ao P-. 0 - - - —.__ fir` .0 1 !71 i 1 p: t i ot o U $ • w O 1 Z +) 13 m a) (' I 0 ' � O' , H in � Hcn rd a) Acc O H H H u, moi N- Ul •H XI •H C •H a) LC\ ow H cd b .-, �Z WN +" H2 OH •r-i �`' CV • W N o27 a) • Q) r� O aS O zi cd u cd a) a cd v 0 cd u I 'd y-FH t, x P a) x P., Pt l). a) x, N H Q cd cd 0 W 0 H 0 H PA O 4-t ,. \O L, r--1 H O rc CN O E S-t -P 4-, c.) rn cd O c0 cd ci`O cd Urn .- y i I r-1 W rz M U) 0 M U) o cn co 0 H ; c U) P. --+h v+Zt1�Le -..f-A-71„..4: 777 .r"7::::::::::=„. v i.:k.�V 'e i�f.•h1 L31i.r•.l L�•w�'L�i �r+•Cl.^^tl�A^1.,� . —'trl^n;'TLL�!'�iilit~•,.ar C*�1`.` • , .,•444,A34~.. • '.4{: : ,00,104,4014. , f1461101t ' •" rr.,13:30, P6+ 61Itk .":`- t .47'7:'?'-'.14t4 x:l';;.'k .. ." •4H'. ;k.r +any d•;tt /7' 1 1t a p , v`^i �• --4.) r i.Cl' C` ILr — 1 H , _ , .I I 'a Il }-1 t ; 1--t l— N l- � 1-4 �"' I-4 1— -- -- — 1 t---1 W oa 0 "0 LLIN.J it Q o' NO i el 6 C— I— O t L4 oc �O r1 0 c Q I\ M �^ cO w d ) I • — 0 H o f o ti 0 0 0 0 ,r o 0 0 0 0 0x � Ire Ix � m o In � o •� Cr) r; O U N ^ In IN H N O II, .:7 O O O O H O ^N O - O Lr n J � - I 4 M O I rMI I N o O - I o O ( 1 1O r 3 M _7 H ^CO •rl .7 O De j N N 4-, 0 N F-1 N H RN o0 O Z U c!\ 4_, u"\ O u-\ O ^ 1I\ If\ t O I Z I •ri 1 U O 1 3 I M1 W ::-.1=-7 Ir\ H • CO H H CO O CO ^ CO - Ei U O 40 O U O W r I O .23 r-1 O X --i ,� ZI ro I O I I \O0 I - co r N -a, o r- 4-1 r- H CO N ti N H —1 X p4 I O N Z,-1 o 0 N W N O ^ N PG M N r0-I N N 1_ W I ~ Z W U 3 - ) G c4 uFi in a, • w a) s o � 1a " ?1 r--Z GY A a) aY r o O N n ((1.) N O v o P-1 N 03 WE v/ C° 1 z `O '`1) i; • I C`a ` ' y'': .(1, tRn*11, ,4liaNPLI4441 ., • J.:y•—ivircMi M'' C ofFM - f a •..1�,':470: 4r. `. r. _._ _ , Q - t. _ +1 i 7 i� H ' J r) • !Li) l4.1 . W • __, Nti' 1 Ia L ,_. , , . i , H 1 { I l: , Z J' Q .L ICC 01 ti L'-O u•I r _ U) rl _ '' J) ,W U t'r1 --1- CO _ H .� IOC t ' �.• f\ U ,-I r- N '4ii 4 \O _9 (•-) f r) ril V'\ Cr) -I' } • 0 0 o O O V o N a: hi _L-7-_____ -__t-1 F-. H 1! H r- -t-_. 1,4 1 I o o o 0 o w o a 0 0 0 0 0 U) ^ 0 0 _ I I I 1, ! CU 41 1 N ON ..7 JJ , H 'D 0 LIN r4 LIN 0 • N- N Q\ W • '' O 0 0 CI) 0 j 0 0 • a '"' I t(\ r-I I I \ r, 1 ) , :�_.' I Crl (r) M • H O _1- Cr) 4•4 J 0 4 -NL ,•L I •� O N CEN N n N 0 3 0N N W 0 0 tf\ U\ 0 • Lf\ �O a� to tf\ U) U) i� 1_ U I I I c- I U O I I I �?4 — Ir, '-0 co 0 CO tf\ CO • N- 00 Co ^N 4O W ¢ ' 0 H 0 W -I-)H 0 � 0 0 0 4 • Cl.) - F-I 0 i-) 0 O\ ON U) O\ P-I • O\ a\ 0 c0 XI 'A U) I I I 3 I 0 I I U-•-1• I�, Z H N- L 4� U) C 4 0 40 L N- H 0 YI i H o N N N 0 N O N a) N N 3 H +' 0 ^ U z Iia 4O U) R] �1 +-) try _ 2 S~ O ) (: 0 4 Pa O -- a) x N L( 11I� C--- -P 0 •J C; L —C '-' w a) ^ U) o Cr) ,tk .:J G 0 t{ to z rH o o cc o mi-r\ U) aW + r s ) - '.V H Cu tot H x U) Oo +) -P a) N0r) a) $-, 0 i • C.) to W r-I "' j -i r-1-4.(I) <4\D trio 0 W c0 0 4 • U) ii � j � ' • tan - 0 � pr- H t3 00 ¢ NCm-• ! a� , . .I C o • o H N o in o Cr) 0 (a. Y .y cn - •H N U 0\ 3 to U CT, CW CU tf\ • N }tl c0 Q C.) H •Crl - a2 '-1 '. , '.r 0 E � I . r) N h] :: ^ Irl 0 y. ON L I I I 1:] u1 a) N /Z t- .: - , -r N o CD CO 1 N r-1 0 ^LI\ CU -7 N W n ( N •H t1\ 'x [-- N x N CO N r u • 7, «\ H X a cltr s) i u tr\ 0 tf\08 In a o _ r-1 - • H t- r-1 H ^N H H P.4 ^ H0 U O- - HO + HI.-s -' ' Ho 1J t-'c I O N •-, W 03 W 0 0 , .) H c0 H U) CD P- Cr) z c0 I1-, 0 U) co z CO P, +) 0 n H t Li *: 1) I) , 1 4i I I Z 0. rd of � •� � No r Q pq +' lif bOQ) H N •r-I FT1 'H -.-1 a) a) Q) .' Ord °e r I cd cd U) Cl S-' H ,(i H car) •r-{ 3-4oo -O 0 H -H O Co •ri U 1 CM' 0 I cd ^ Cd N N n a)4 4H • H " o P cd (1.) W cd 08 d rd td P, ND P' O N x x C W •ri cdW 2i O cd a) 0 C �, CO U�O � tr\ v O O O 0 O O •H CO cd O\ cd �^ A r4 U) rl a R N O r w Ty r4� 6 411*%4 rS10:ry ;alt"ri; , ,. - ,e,. or,, „arsa. `4",.,1#4111•7‘114 I.• ,P Z"i•#_,; s. J (\ P` Q - 0 -` �\ Air. I )- -- 1. 'Q. Q" �; - r- f ' • r ; - . N til Q - I- el' 11 1• L N { I-- -1 1 f I-t — kir 0 F- •.fl ,� t` j,O N 1 ,..r\ I. _ u_ N I I 1 — -- .. 1 r 1 - 7 I1 W a1 N- -- 0 H c `1_ A a Q u� N- e c0 - N• N Ntl u, o J i 1 o o H r o N C m I.4) - H HH A I- 1 ,,• 0 - O • o r_, r1 I w o • i t. ) C"1 '"? r-i •-1 N b0 (� ', I N ri L. r, N U) N ^ Q) C,a f u1 a) 0 N 0:1 L. I I U O 0 L. Li - O O H (541 rd � ,? I-r7 W 0\ U O O 4.3 II 0\ rn Z W CT r- �i r- O\ C- 4-1 H Z ` N C�] N N OD' r Yr .w p X 1./.. 0'1 - 0 J- c,� G oC r i 3 W O c� • +� [..;, L U r_ Cr) fi a) Q l o h` ?N+ {/, I H Ul-�rix U Lh S-i LC dD ^ -- 1- f._ 4 L` L W 1 w 1 a) rl 3 <4 r-I U u1 c0 N CJ L CD I n c.) < • O t'i k} C ; n , i CU 4 H N- a• ri c 1 N X c0 a) N NI ti '', • 'L U) N O U\ W • 1 I { i ;n Q 1 .6 U res 14 r-L ^ r' r; L , (-71 N H N N 'x • N O [ — i u. x0 -,- 0 u\w ��" g — H m H H Cr) — - G1 C -- HOH H- Hl r1 Or- 3 n U I ' ir\— H K Z N CO Li Z tI] ll) li y'. n 1 4 ,.: U ! O t..- ,0 L V, 7 -H P J (- \-- pA. 0cd C0 G` ,� • 'n nCo23 , W ci O - aM. Z 0 a) N 3 c� t)] Q if U ? .,�. y' • a) m a) w Fq ± J "'r O 0 r-i •r1 0 a- • N 0 •d ,----1v h " Cr ' N EQ CO (1) i- r 0 0 r9 CNI H - Cd 0 .' ?, 0 /`. r--• COi - 0 i- o ff H J CO I © d O 0 • M. 0 x cd - J cd Wi-,1tL\ • a) H CO In co N Qi CD r E O 1 U I �T" Q d O 01, Cd H U N N 1 �1� - _a.i : a C'.'.��L�.ili. -•,..,44,4•10.4•401 , - I a . --‘•.:. '.•:' P••Mo'! ',1:7.'4 � ri;)5$-,! tr!`,i';r� '+It• <.' V'r4 * .,.Uf • tom_ Q r- ).- 1 1� IT, N Z r ;-- ti n) r- r t�- c(i N I t,^ �-_ W -J I,� _. r In i — re Q -- ti W co Z Q Ilt H • Ice0 M u-o c Li r. ——— — U) Q � in N 9 cn I'll 0 et .., u-\ f O 0 Q U Cr) ON �1� H N Li' HN Hr•- t___ HJJ N N_. H - )-- 0 0 0 • 0 k' r 1 ..-1h0 ON W N I • I. I Ir; 0 o8 ) VO CON PG �+ rol 0 >C ±" „: I Lei 0 W O 0 O 0 ,0 0 CO 'ry I-, I ;- N is N N •7 Cr) u") N W '' Z I I L 3 W LIN ,..8u� r • H LIN c4 '-' Q U O 0 O 0 TN co H W ca co - F r-I C ON a I Y. I ON U 08 N ON • H �.l ti- - O C� N W Z N CO N cd Q) cd N >S s E±3 pl I- .> . .. ' �' 0x CO CO d O u) 0 H X Q N o8 c' 4.J c H U] N [� m a W cd t •11 G V H U v rn H N N N U r b N ]r I w 3 fti O GZ cd E� cn ! 0 i d ~ ., d O V-, W P, ' U) rn •tw o u, ca cP ° v CO a c0 v 0 • Pa • 4D ..7 N U N .� J Co ¢ I p iyCO H .� N 4 0 d ' H 3 SF L W W ^ y, •H Q uN X N I) •'3 �1 Ns-7 •� N s1( N (�1I- O N rCI CQ- 'f — I I-1 W • i- • d I Lr x it\H z N rU\ • tl\ 08H 1J H H0 HrI . • H � W W • rH-Ir il am a W c0 CO cO w 08 a3 w m om • ._ .--. - L ! `' n ! n z r 4t 08 co Z N. r11 A �, I is cc cu q Z 3 x 3 08 Ti • •d O -LI H 3 ,--DH cd H A W 023 N p A .. I N S.. Hrl N H cd N •rH-i �-i yS I;, N N cd N W N cd cd cd cd 9"» I N f-, 0 3~ 08 J-, I. cod U C4 H 08 U v H U H HH H 4' N x N S-, N N Si 9) N ;, T+ O S-4 ? 4 H • (1) O H cd N 0 H N N cd Q) -H a) 0 • 40 L=, 0 S-4 40 In 0 cd d cd x O F1 cd cd .4 cd a3 x cd cd d cd cd i h W W a) x cd W x x x x r I N O N co N O O O O O r1 h U HN v )~ 4D 40 a0 P i~cd H 0 O cd H 0 O a; H cd O cd O cd I4-D on W C) M on W N t-D on ,--i Cr) CO N HD CO^'1 ��1t-, . 3i.: 4 ZI..7- _''.'��''^ y, .. ....Js.Si.sonri;. a , r i,L;1..a. -• `_i:ws ,+Liisa'a`Y Vt, ,.0414.'" ''``.':;;„:,*t'.. - " ofkik H .:.,.ac 1.011; .7 ', ''` t# 1 . *+4,00Pv4 -'16401°I51*.'titt(*"t'".t' .!Y,it°44,1041,.ft eA' (' i • -J r' t� I- f,3 1 - _ t1 - eI 1- s- E. i Ni• ` 't_ U - . N1 ' Q 1rrt' I. 1_ j IA 1 i H r --I I--1 i-- --I i-f _1 H H I t,{ Z<I Q ° '0 co \0 — LL° H Ho ....1- /H — j a\ r-I !w r o C� `J (`ten N :0 Q q H 0\ C_ LA M (r' N COO N M m O N i[) - --4----- H 1-" — H I" _._ _.__P 1-.� H k s` O o .-. O O Cn CO • O O o O tr\ O I I • O N N O\ HO O H 0 H J.) [. 0 o3 H r1 �p -Zr H 8 H I-x v > c,0 1 [T i 0 0 Cu x 0 0 - 0 0 W 0 O !Y N 3 W 0 e-S 0 M O M 1� L 14 M [=1 ( N K N - N 7 N N- H. N LI N Coml) N r3 2 to W0 u • Lr\ t- u\ tr\ LA C!1 — T d '-� CO oa co �+ rn I I ON a [�; ; 0 0 oNw 0 0 Z 0 0 m 00 In o o H '--1 I N- N r. 3 C,, ..›1 N- rix t O r'- N O N- .7 411. ON N W N N N N I—I a, a I ° r • g-, U] .. NCr) 3 r- 4 40 --7 t— J l G O\ 0 Q) s o23 rn N O 3 01 .0 N �' L+ r11 L U] '0 tom- CCS 1- :>, v; H .1 LL 1 U] �. U d Cl) 0 ,yr /) , Cr) W M Ii • 0 4-I rix 0 MON rY • ,A • . «y 0-1 r I 0 H - 0 w H r-i C-- ON CSI.-- 0\w M \.o , m - x•00 I 6 • H • 0 F-. O --1" r i riN u-\ O3 L �'.4 i ,.j 0 +) W ,-i7 ri.r 7 0\ .-1 N w -.4N O N CvI S 1 N r, N N 0 .r) N U1 (1J 1.4 r) ." N N '1 N -r1 CV N _ ' a 13-7 . 0 .1 IN 0 ..tr\ W • LL.-- 0 in N tri • in d to 0 Cry 0 t- i _ H C!] M H COM H -Zr ,--1 H H H0 r-I �tl • H N H O H • H O ,-i\O H H r-I H 11 I H co co m � coa. W corp � W IAW• W I 421 — ---- _ T) i 1) ii 1"1 I) r it. 11} tc 1 ex ci W Zd • rid a�� 3 x 0 •H H .. C ._z- -r1 tnC Y.)r-i xIf oN cd 8 > � ;.-4N i C,. O F-+ tr) S o cd cd ii WO ti N ��- CO 40CO rte-I t5 s7 ON M ?'":77 mR----- 7°47'7'77--.__...- .�-..._-..�. t...7..472-2.7:..a (T ake -`tic -- ----..;1:- .“—.),._.. ...r -.....:_.. .�.,�.ini�,S.0�._ � .._....._....�..�__�� .. ..`._. t�� ...,_i_�.�_. ;{�-Z��3�:4Lr"'waii4.YGdail�v:i.kfirt.`L15:iY t'•. s na aba't rommty ' 441004,A0 tozorFr,,p"itd ` .i l- "Mt• i+ •4°Pc h}r• • ^ .E • J t\-, _-) ', O i\-, _ 6 ,— 0 .,.‘1 i w N M - — l \ • f. _ l,, T v1 4) to r x c) 1 y H N r~ i f . ° I { W l)l ZQ y. oCO 0 LL 0H I--- Hp LL ✓ -i I ( o _ —; ,'- co 0 H ^� OYl M cc 1 WCJ Lr\ CO ti.' to lP O\ ".. C H l F N- p 1 fr Q U\ O O O G O L.) O o H ;.. I 0 0 0 0 oo 0 .--- I I I i I I L. I H H to H (Y) LIJI I O OI [� 0 O 0I N 0 0 +� t r CO 0 CO CO 0 I0 k> .- 0 HI i �I i ��iS-4 <V 0 H 0 .7 ^0\ Z H N (Y) U] W 0 N 0 N H CO',a I OI I OI I U � W Li\ X (Ntf1 t1 N > I 0 CO11 r_1 U) 0 .� 0 W P-. 0 O CO 0 • s--- '.) C.> H 0 O\ O O\ Z O\ 0 0 - 1IA l rl I I.. "rI l N- N- L 4-i 0 N- O\ W H ZI Cl) -1 -{ r0 `' x (N N N N O " H N H N 4 3 "� I • 0 r-I U] • -P Z O CJ] ,- j •J d L G H U O cd r'I- Z 1� W L , - E; r__4 U N W • Pa-1 ) to I W '_; LIN O x W H Is \D+� O • I V) 1 Q) 0 W 0 l% I • Z Lf\ bD P, o Ln Z • Lf\ 1--'I , H N- a) +� ix N M 0 l s� I -0 < 1 U N- 0 +s0 • H Z •r r-I.1 ^ Cl) >4 L�CO •� I-i i O N 1-1 ri N Z O\• ^ N O O N Z Z t--- y„♦ .1) r'11 IN H • • N y-1-1- - -L7 • • Ln 4.1 LnW Ln 1`- I \ <4 O H O bp In U] t 00 "•' — H H ZH e 0N H • H — .IN - a) N' H 0 in t H ci CO - C1.1q K \ 'Qo P•1-t Z f ✓ I� JJ 1 n n ti c4 z • a) tri Z • . . a) v U t 3 d b a, v a) a) 14. ▪ W Pq 3 I~ h fO s-. v CO C to a ci 73 cd •H •H �' ,-I a.) I H (1) •d cd ,. 7-. •,-1 , N cd x 7-> ,HX OH f~ H v a v a ni S-, +' i I WU ; ci v r=1_, +) x cd K, CO a) o 0 art v 0 r U E o a) n � rn • i 0 a) cd s, cv +� 0 0 0 a) 0 ac h cc) :.\ \U] N !Z N E-I c) H Crl 0 cd . "C:._..--1 4111431.44-"'+1:7t0;11'.. :.--T-71.--1:....- .Pr. Ai :S/;:a'5��.:Fu'i..r 1,.lirr:. .i .:$agel2 "' „,, ISP~i c1 ,-**A#0i 9h1 aw 4 0 \0 .. , . . . ,40kb,r jil .. `t 1.,1,,,,,,.M7 do,, , W v U' Q _J VS `' ¢ 9 It ' l''' o� cgo LLO • LL — I —�- n Q cn, i o \C) [-- Cr) 1$' Lai'O� CV r.,r m o Qchi' u, ✓1 in r1 ('? on — 0 0) - m 0 0 4 0 0 1-J 0 tom- r{ 0 0 N - I o 0 0 0 .- 0 lS o IJ \-0N N 0 I W C O> p; -:71O �p N 1 \O O rk > 0' 1 ,.10 ..7 0 4- 0 VO 0 -- W O G O { rol D 1 h1 I1 U]- 01 O N A. 01 I 3 U)0 CD I •i I ak ,c.5. H rl 5C N H - %. N t-1 rl N • w N Z N N O N 0 N L(' O rl L\ O\ to •r4 uC L(' 11\ L('� L U 1 �I 0 3 to o2f I H I •,-1 r-I I H 1 .. -_ i1 d �0 o w z 0 6 0 4•it- 0 `� 3 co X a o — O\ U) O\ (I) O\ 0 CO O\ w CO Q\ •r.i ON H Z a c- i r- •-11 rn I w N- ^ r- 0 `a N H-1N O� N f-1 •• N x N - N O • N I �_ I0 0 Z if\ 4• 4-4 H W N U f. =7 :1 a � N W o w \..0 N-rd o a � U] J E w (Yl 0 ri O cd 4, 'd 1J G V i-i H w 0 e23 p N -P �+ 0 P4 It 1 >--I.- Q) v1 ,- O Z 4- is U • 4-) 3 - �. 3 W Z n . ' Cl 4� `° ^u\ U) 'd 4, N dC- <4 0 L.; 1-; u) M E 0 cr• 0 r-LT 0 [k E W r• 4, In (/\-i- t, J.; a) • u, oaco 03 .� W oo . o z _. C c) 0 0 H r• CI) c\„; r� z. oa 1-• ,� a o r- 00 u U t w --7•"-1> v •-11 0 H r• - o �/1 d I oY, L. 'i z � � ri X 3 H D-1 4) Z o N N N N- w N Z H N r ^ ^ CV H . CV r-1? 1, I) N r3 •OHN in O < N-L1 N r -,.- - N N 3 3 3 -7 rl O CO iH U] � N r-1 •rin CI) P-i H H� Z 4, rel u r. H LIN ) U InH — E 1H O H o a sy�{ I I 0 O H O N- c- - ix r'{r1-1 o ma n u,w3W owW COUP-1COH co 41 1 1 n i n ! . IJ n n �' r 1 ,; C Iz I ! P 'd U N cd N • U I O ,-i N =t O 0 'H X 'O rl °13 r-i O .--icd H c1\ -S4 a, c3z. O cd cd N I H N v Qi : O o23 cd .23 cd HV Pa N P+N r I yr O\ tl CTS S Pi cd N ^J r-I - H Pa N •rl rl N Fil '-� 1 i� rl Q)' N iDQJ I O O q o O ^ O O O O d I Q, r'1 U Pa l:1 .f, a R'. a c t-J Z \, a I i• -,-1,7777"7.772, '="777,',717777:7:'..rira.i...:: -:.:it .s;c.,...>;�.' _rsali...v.i. lig,: , - a,c-,fo ... .y , �. 4,,wr-,•rv.l a ;.,t'*3-7m--7 `,r,,;=,,;(4..:.` ::f.,'T.'""77-77,77717.1..".77.- toitif, , Sar•. .. A -4 .1 {ii- O- - V , Q '' 2` I 0 O 1- I !i .1'` A• • i QT 1 ! ,a Zj If N tr _, _9 o N tT �! rT �} r r -9 D° ►'� I� t O J • W _ s \'' _ — rl — *� - f) is 4 Q" a H I— H t-- H F H 4— --1 H i-- 1 W I 03 r,. 2161 o 0 ,t LLO H :: H H ' I 14 /� Q �. Lf\ U o CO ..••_.,N N Q, `i•/___. W H if\ CO N O\ T 0 N- 1 1� C 1 O O 0 O re c_41 ,-O 6 O (0 o Q %,' — 1 —14'_— - E4_ I- N_4_ H - N E--___. —_,• L _ i o 0 0 0 0 0 ' I o o . o o o o I I N I 1 I I — N N- N c is •^ .-? O\ Fq 0 O\ ^ 0 r-I H W CO 0 0 0 H c) > ,.; i 0 0 0 Z 0 0 (1 0 N �r U I a8 I a)co H O II Z-� O CO O N H O r1 S~ (Y) O 7 • 4-) 7 7 -1.-•• H I1I O N ,, O Lr\ Nom- L(\ H 3 0 tri 0 H r'7 u� CC/) W ` - 1 d j \o Lt1 • ao 3 t!) �o Co to •,--4 r� 1 ^U) E' I ` Cl) ..7 0 .- 0 _7 0 0 3..7 co i••i ^ -_H � 0 ON ON 023 Cl 0 a\ c._) n XC/) O\ O\ 0 I -1,-.1 i ZI c,; I I k I 0 I I NI O N- W r- N- W N- '.O H N- C-- W W t-- -I ,,a - G U) N N H N N N Zai N Z\D I I - H Z. U) 40 r- 41 N cri ,) CJ 0 a) O O 4-4 . ) G ' a r-i - r• m En ua if-) m Cl) +'co o � J u jj N UCi - F, 0 0 ^ CO Z E n a) Si a) P, -P a) - N • cO LI\ "i' `i.J , 7 f) ';'' 0 cd N ti~ O Lr\ ccd • CO r-i-i •N ., � x •-1 N- H -P ON z -7 M r I -..1' N O\ r CD -� • W Lr\ H Lr\ H CO Y •* cr) • X cC O •00 CO3Z t-- HHN j `0 ¢ , ,'; .� x w • 0 N- m N- u) • 3 3 , N.-ia Cn N Z N ON N N N N n I N 3 N Ni N r-i-r • • N r-v • tf\ CJ)' L r-uv Co N 3 L(\ LIN �CO U\ NiW 1-f\ Z, H H Cl) H ^H r-1 N N r-1 H N- L ,---1 r-Lss H 0 r- r-1 0 H 0 nN i\ : o COazR -I- COCOfVI COQ QZ n I --/ I) n ;yy; _ :q to It ,> Ri; Ice W Z a) •� c H •� 1 00 r=l •ai rte{ cHd Ca H H .t cd a) a) ,--I 4-1 a) a) a) -H 1•? b N!Z COCO 0 C�o CV +) a a)H '-a r-i Sa t Pa tom, a) .23 40 073 S-, R. 03 0 y02Ll cl 73 ON r3� 4-) TS W icil 4) \ -3O I H 0) 06------ S, o cd O ;.-IO O 0 O b)C')O C O d C) N .--1X N W c\-1 ., ,• c- + , ~ - st7,r 1. , 1 - ,.y .. It 9k"�.f} srNra•^ tt,.,:.ri. ;9 t. .v1111-44e. 4 r•--. ri 7 Q -i4._.. N 1. MJ 1 _ a. z N _ r- Le) i s o (� ...-r\ - �^ _ w i l ' 11 I' r-- i;, N Ln `fI — I i j I a x. mo . YJ co M H1�,H - Z. CI Q (-f) ui t! c- o 0 0 0 o o H = 0 o 0 U -- I N +- H__ .__.N. N N H f _11 1 o w + 0 0 0 '~ { 0 — I ; o U) 0 0 0 0 0 I 1 I I I 1 I F �� o o rMi o o � U) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N- 0 I. L • I I „ N N N H 0 N N -7 • 0 c ' LA u\ U\ LA 0 u, LA 0 F _ ,-I 1 • 1 I 'd I I I CD rH I ; G; I ::1 OO H UN CO OZ \O LA CO H \O i D 0 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 - O\ \O • CT 0\ 0\ Ci 0 0\ 0\ 3 O i' I C-, i--- • O N- N- N- O N- N- �W N- 0 Z N—I J O I O N E p� N N Cr) +.) N N U) N •• +� N 0 ,_i z � w\O • rn — - Ri I O U O H U) O\ bD H •i-r i a I ••-+ x 0 ul f=1 4 Fq ul 1J v ! E w �• - - OM - 1 v � i z N- 0 a z N v ( E W , ) •'17 0 0 0 w 0 N- - cd LA UA cd U) H 0\ Cl)H 7 M H• Cr x J'. v ., (i •H TN Cr) Cr • M 'SD \O 0 O ';• a j • off o • 3 H � • marl �Iif\ ii I 0 • -- N wow N ri N- N - N H N O C)) N N X_7 N N H N - N•'3 H r1 -- U1 U) LA LA LA Lr) LAO to U) H m t • U F� H 0 1i H H H 0\ H O H rH H O HH O O O \ y'. HU U) GO P N f� ? CO P1 N H 1)0 f;. Ai 1) i ,. l 4r ..) } cd [, I w U Z I~ cd T• 3 a) S~ N C) 073 H M Q4-3 I N Q 4 I ,--i �: s~ H cd O O ,-I f. •-I N cd a) a) R -7 •H a) j O cd s~ GJ bD Cn a) C. cd bD ' N rd aa)) H � U aai � C � u� HE-+ O .,-I +) (Z f-4 a) .s~ a) lam '' O b0 Z Vl Ln }3 O �� • A H cd cd cd v N • cd cd H (----- x ¢ w E-4 P-. 3w o ax aJa it; v N N ( O -P Xi t, M H N N H Q\ 10\ C H cd i�O cd 0 ' --+ 0 f-+ 0 O O aI CV C a) 0 0 O cJ M Ni H N M U CV P- .U.,.••..i�.itel -�Y yy •yti1; .x 7•`a( � `g4•I'M{V= m4 �' - PA. Y x 4z9 SRy '.e. s,i/• •3 • J o I- (i 1 -� , I C (-' ' r I t�' I W - 1--- - k• r•I �, cJ cn <— Vi iQ — —1 N N H 1-- 1 w I' 0 .1,I z �I LIN LL0i - 0, N J 1 .11 : U M d .�r .P O N Q1 M t11 ..7 l\ u; (, I`- r- 0 loc -7 M u, c.. u, ,r Qri o o ,.- O O 0 ;� •-- I L :i hl t ! 1../ 1 I O O O v O O :1 O O O O O O I 1 1 I 1 I '— \D \D O\ N M N J i y o 0 ...1- 0 0 ' J: ' liii' Vi OoII1`--7O Hti •HN xO • • d r-iCV b7 (I) O HlIl • 1 CO I=1 h0 tIN :� O W M `. 'd ix) 0 0 H o M U Z CYC• [`- to 0 RI CO H LIN 0 H LIN 1' a: N • cd In H �.r u pa 0 L_ 0 0, W I4 P, W ,, . , F� U) -. �a N N S~ N ^Z r N�i� O n N N _p pis N•-ix N ^ N -p ^ ix Cn • O - 1 M N H I N r-1 H tIl tI\ \ U] tinO UN CO - • I H U] u - d H H 0 .-u H 0-I- W H O CO I 1 IN - k) CO LIN (\.1 Cr) c0 0 U) CO N M CO -4 CON 1 i j w n ni•,,, 1 i •Y L., 1? ° 4 H rri cd a7 m pp cd cn w 0 cd 'I Sti Iy 4 fti Si .- 0 r-1 S-1 Si U 0 Z 1 Ei S Si E-i CV O +-, 03 H •.1 I-1 a) c,3 -' S s P� O .0 Sti 4- o2i 40 P. O co O a) x co a) O I ( a, m x p, •H 0 x i., r i cHd tI‘ v °_ a �b ° U2 0 L V - V1 ° r'-i a) I 00 0� ° o °i bo b 0( N C' L s rr] Ei M U) G-i -i 1 N ri a "% • ;,,,....-,,_,- .1,,,Altormetews*,A4 silS MI A'.a".=:-..1.1:31.= ' ' - 1111 "77' 77.7"..".7"77.1 I kider,,•.-if hgAv ..?'. tatt;. 1 . . —. 2 , ...._, C 1r ...a e-, o- 0 l.,) r•-• NJ • 1 i: I Pi ,..) • 1..1} • ! Z T r 5 0 o C , c- L: (,i c •,, v) , 7- rf r -• ----- t-4, Li--., r, r [ . In V e. < 1 1•• r , $ r_' ' I I ...r.-cr le 0 iti' s•-i ! 1 a-- , I tf <I ci- t-._. r- . N , V\ r- I) UJ (NI C- H .7 -7 CU (' .-, ....... 0\ \ Cr\ (N 1 0 I C n 1 I< q LIN ki N- 0 U C\ - 0 ' 0 --I' \0 -1) • •—• I ' — H f--- H I-i t— H H --- i ...._ -1..J 1 1 o 0 H 0 0 ...... 0 0 ,--I 0 0 0 _ i • 1 +2 CO N 01 if: Ill 0 rtri ---I I-- 0 '• 0 X N 0 I C-- 14 cy-, (,) CO N U) .- 1 ') I • H ".--7 H 1.1 H Cvl H 0 6 , 1 ; . N 5-.1 • N N H ^ I CD r-i ti1 I PI in I 3 Lr\ Lr\ t"-• CO N t"-• Cx.) 0 0 0\ f-1..1 0\ "N- r— ci--1 12Q I 14 C-- U) I \0 in N- H N N N N U) ••• r-I 1 -7- `-`-' .--.. . . c: 3 o ...,_ Z II:----r\ fa' 0 N— u Cl)-14 ,icv N X • C H Tx) Cl) H ix) — -1 1) ! CCL(\CO -P ,IN 0 C') ." Z (.:;rr:4 • N Cl) 0 0\ ON Z 25 I) Cl.) ' V , ' ; r-I N V\ in- •-LI • cd o r,-) c.-1 H N- 0\ N ^ 0 V) 1 U.' ' ' VD f.1 • 0 • C\J Ca i-1••••• M ID (0 Ca '-. OD 0 0 H 0\ V\ • 0 .- 0 N ç •CO 1 QJ r . H o P-.1- Z •H 1 Z • U) ' 0 0 (T 1 0 --i- H • (I) 1 , , in 0 0 14 -1- a) tt I • H • .) < c , 0-I W N- -,4 3 t'-- (I) • (I) • H • ctta L. q 0 ^ r4 1-4 C-- (r) > I 4 4 , ,-,- ,0 ,44 44- 0 c‘i 4.1 • 4, 0, 040 N 41 N -4-) CV "" () 1 1 N N,ix lr\ • CV N N •-i-t 00 -- 3 VD-.1 ^ C41 IA rx1 • tii _ IC' CI) • eel LtN 0 En 0 z tr Lc\ - z co * 1 I E--i H N N H 0 0 r-I N H r-i H H 0 ^GD• H 0 C- H r-I.-14'\D i) ! 1 ri `--. 0 0 44 0 rzl 00 0 XI H N- Z W 3 ---- 1) I) ! 1.1 I 1 I) 1 0 I tl ,1 ..›. cc f w , Z a) .. .; cd ! H X cn rd .8 H 4-) X H I -.J*r-i •ri a) d CD ,-I 3 cti F-a H •-, 0H N E-4 0 cd otS EA ^ cd •,-I X - rid CD '. -PE -.1 , c 4 , • u) ,••=1 ( (1) a) 3 I = cd a) Z CE cd = cd ,.0 0 40 04 , N- t-- 0 1.11 a) In 4-) if-\ La in ( 0 HO a) (\t a) o 00 CDr-/ , 0-4 CY) I-D r-d 1 ' 1 if .3 .. ••• * - - -. •. . . 'v.!:. "��. ,. ;' l.. .- www . YLi,:'IeW J:.•e.�+..►r• — +w a K.-•.Y.e+�L •Y••.�d • - •• 'IW�Lr L Z r+✓ W �u� _, I O , 5' ,G: I ri .`• r— ,t • W — - W 1 _ • tx �. Q. ; <tI v • co O~ 0 ISO H 0 IWOu.Ii -1-1 H til W CO `di 0 0 0 oc UI rl - c0 00 to - CO ,-i - o 0 o O • �' — o Z o 0 0 0 L +I I x I n ^ cY O\ as C • � I '-,;_j o W O N (Cl 0 (Cl D\ p• 0.. 0 1" a; I 1x w ; o I H I H I w F;, 0 3 r I W H H W (Cl (Cl 0 N rl Cl) i H I r.). PIrn N to rd C CO Cq CV Z• -Zr 3 -PW N F- z in 'a 0 LA >ti �, L\ U] 0 0 to O -. ' I I ,a I 3 !ti I 0 I 0 ^ I O -p I U ^ Y`' ._ I Lf\ U) co U N co U\O c0 ^(Cl c0 LA d -- C\ Cl) N • ON LA ON \O ON 0 Cr) O\ • i--�j I C d Z I ' I . N I Z N I O z ri I N t; Z ' t- O N- Cr) N c0 N t` 4-i t --I 0 C N fZ o23 N 0 3 N O N Z O ,w0 N O CO � T •'1 p.' r 1 - N-ix CO CO Lc\ CO ' Q. I O W 3 co co 4-i ^ cl] v. ,,/- �� 1J I 0 3 O CO 1:.1. Crl J J 0 U , �' ^ � O • O cr)N CV � H CO N 40 ` w to � `-i m w CO r-i m ^ L[ H \ O a) 1— .a; E ; W t0 '-d Z LA LA -7 LA w !LA H Cl f) I oI r' O u\ w • Lr\ W • Hcn ,, a, w co ac cn 40 -7 W O Tl 0 0 F7 (i) LA ri N 0.-.r 0 ^al o 0 ^as co t— o 0 +� P4 3 O O\ U W O\ ri N rl O\ U PU VO J c r) Ln - , Z U) O o o O cr) H • o • Q H ' Qa i-) i ci -P i-/ pa\O N- 0 ;-i f-) W W W r rte, 0 LA 0 ^ N- 0 to 0 M N CO N -p 00 N -- t-- N -7 ^ N n (Cl rix ^ N,-is (NJ riY N 0C.-1.3- ('r) ^ N.-it W _._. I cn u) w Lf\ LA _W LA 0 W u\ Z ririx �i 1~IHON 1O H OO riO\ON .0 E{ W —\O W \\O W 0 — 3 \O 0 - -- ' r LnU) N cOp., rfZ cOpa-7Z cOQaCOZ a0au• r-i �tt}� a I) n 1J 1 INn I I r,. lei ?c .:iI LY Wlog Z u) 3 x v I>, Ti u u •O co u cd s~ > > H �., H--i- - ' L. - •*,--1 - a) pat- a2H 3 Ca C -P ,D (n x x Cd s� u, +) a) 03 C) a) Z N u\ x '� N r-i s~ u s-, z U • C-XI I-, U N rE H ani o w to• U COw -/- '4 4f H +, aO (1) i) CO -, Cr) 0�• ‘ u O n O a) O (1) 0 0 O cd , Z U H CZ C7 N :.C. N t N C1 ..._.... .t..:.1:.-t Ra s.ai5j,wY.._5,Ai. •_—_�.....-7—_,.....—"-77.71.7.77:77-=":7:7,..:,.:.,fS�..,343n.iia:r1. r"441 — . ...k..r. :. w' :°"d ,may„ 9',''° .• .,.._ , .•.w -x.51.7.1 ,,�.:,..w:.. ;u"' 1i +'"1.11*.. i iii,r.• '.404411...;;,.. I- O rt) - ,r, ; II t\1 •Cc1 Z cA -9 r r N I',, • 101 N' N H 4 J H J Fj 1—j N !— t W ' Cly O\ZtDI t. I 0- . CC I NI-- ., � I"O, 1-1J -` I M ` " \C cu M \O '' \ 7 LIN N O M u Q) . CO .f) 1 Q ul M tfv N u \O iv-) t- If i, j�++ Cl) \O co Q N H CC) 00 2. oc . , - Q <401 -9 0 L u, CO N M N ,'. I i 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to 1,:: r1HrIH toN b• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C4 ;'; I I 1 I I I I01 , r' in ONCV H 0 cn 3 77 N 0 ^7 -, N N N N U) N N N W A 4 +1 1- U t11 LC\ to Lr\ I Lf\ U\ 1 I I I —� , I H tr\ 1-- Co 3 0 O O _ ¢ 0 0 0 0 0 Z rn o. O\ 4 _ -t; 5-1 Z I • O�Iv Orn 0\ I ,g C---• �- t I I o vI - 'O 0 N N N N C4 N N N H -I 04 f- CY N W J :/) LI a r-1 H W Z e, L \J , F� r-LI 1 r1 E , W I W U) b ' n -. (/) 0-I I ~' i- 0 41 .y v) I j \O r-,1 W t(\r-'� - H ji CO y N •� • U) 0 Z �• Z O\ v,`. co U\-ix \D M (n ' ;1 H.-,x H tf\ 4-) W • 0 H W U) O O H • 1.. ti , -..1. Z Q ZI' W• �133y ` N N 03 N O N N N N tl) f) N,--1_-: N N N tr\ N r-1s N r-1.1 N.-Is rt 3 1.4. rd W 3 r-,.s — tr\ U) to W LI) Ci) tr\ • 1.1.-\ , If) U) tr\ U) W H H CO HJ H\O H H H U) j 11— •3 S- H r-i- H H H H r--I H r-i_S H r I./ H 1-1-1 <, � �; N w ._.. j -.7 U) tr\ U) t`- U) ao 3 0\ r— s� tf\ Z 0 IJ 1J 0 t 47 Q oc EI W I-1 1.I I 3I j 0 a ti M H tf\ cd .r-I Nu) H I- N N N z, U] `Yr SC O rd H s~ O N y.QJ, cd XI v N ; I� H P, tIO i)OCC3 O d Gcd ' m Xna , m Q - t1 ti } O � i • r; �. a) ,1' r �- Ti, ,tr) 1 N r": N N [1 (x j J 14 4, rI _._-_ _._.._. __ 1 W . il cn Z0 Q - F- ta.O H LL C!) 14 C q' 0 0 H - ..O ,,. CO U ) - Kd r- _ Co Vcn N N 0 0 1- H --- ItI N I-•••-• ,-- O 0 0 0 O O O 4-1 O �' W I 1 4� l .11 CO a\ � 1--1 N o O U :7 0 0 0 -- 0 d O ' K � • ) �c� I I 1 �. 1 co I 1 0 0 7 4� - 0 ..� N CO) W 1i -� H u 0 0 N 0 u� 1 r`' I 0 0 to • O 0 U H i 0 ZZ, 1; - ', d c, ...7 '0 0 U W t� CO• X • . . 0 0 0\ 0 0 W 0 COC!) 0 i: l [ [I I t` U - H I rd t 41 rim Z • _.1 10 � O N N N •�• ^ N P: N O � - 4 0 4-1 0 ON .1..) G UlIN I - ,i� N o Sti N 7 3 CO '',i I) 1 '0 1 (' fi W Zz - No23 O 0 ? 034-ico • c''1 _7000 _ • / Q f , j • •�+ 7 H N '4 r-I r1 r-1.-7 1. N N 4-1 06 -,23 `- f) I Ncd t O N r-' _ N O I H HCC) N u\ R �- W � H +) H O Z • LI ' cd ccdd N 0 3 HQj r i tf� CI-4OD , �. I •l Pa P� CO R.. CO U co Cl) P N Cl) 0 10 • I) 1) I) i ' I) I t I aoii — ..--1 �4. w I O •r{ Z U ' H > 1 0 ti O ! a rd ' H ami (r U (2 m H U 0.130 r-1Cd 01 cd cn > 0 21 SI +) ,-I al a 2 Z v ami coy N CO °; 0 00" Co 3 0 t I co 0 LO +) cd o Ncl--' r�1 pa°'o m a, �: ri.-) � • 00 CdUN u) c7 P m # P:+..GY .l:wii'flrM')i � ar -. • . . L' :1._....Y.L 'i;‘,1a,Karoza,,Ii. ,.L.,....-7,,,-...::. • . . I ••,..'• mt,tTle, .-iiii,•c• Pi Sgt*•:-',,e.,,•)!eirtery• „ )0,,a,ii,;;..44, 1- ......_. 1 ...:, ., ..! • -..._..+ . ...i (X - • ,--. "......., Ch- 41 I-• \., ' - 0 .. •- 1.r. . , 1 r ,1 *I ' 1 '1',.. -.. .1:, Z 1 (NI ,i k NJ,- - ..., r..-- , 06 • li.1 I r•-• (--, I tr) CO - _. .U.! ' - • Ii, I VI ! In I H I , . ;-: )-- # i - : , H ,-- - - _---- •t:', 1 , u.• ii.-,, .• 0 • •ce 0 •...1 1 1 -r -4- i I 1 . , iI 1 ..) t• _...„ I cc if\ . N- C sl ,.. CO cc u) t-- r. .....i. - cc i" _../- :•.• \C) 0\ .•, I ILI CO I .-1' • 0 r -...- 0 ',.., in ,..0 ,..., ,. .."'-,..., r• cc in - ,I fx a), co op as) '',4 0 1 ... La , _ ._,I • . 0 I..-) - 1.f\ -C.) 0 0 0 ;.„ r: '---. k s__ _. ..1.1 , 1 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 — i 0 0 0 0 0 0 — 1 I I I 1 1 cr\ --1. 14 If\ 0 LA '.f• -1.1 I 1 L.r\ o•\ •-..-1- \o --, ; i .•.' LC\ 0 > :..., ,l I :'1 0 CO Cf) 0 Z O z c" 0 -, 0 0 0 • t• ._, I 1 , a I 0 ._ , cc 4-4 ''' H 0 0 I •N r-i a) cc __.1- • o 0 __./. co 1 w i- cr) cv c•-) 3 cc • 0 c0 •''.'••• • -i-D r H CO H 0 r-1 ,. C\.1 If\ N .1-1 CO CV .H en C\j •--1.4•• N N Q) LA i I Z H 0 3.- .- 7 ' LI\ I --1 I u-\ i-) N- I 1 I cc Lc\ a ...._ -..- i.r\ '3 Z • •H U) if\ — •:; < 1 :c.-1 co co 3 co 3 Cr) co c0 c0 a) H —•• I 0 0 • 0 3 0 0 0 - o 4-) cv .' _ , • o•• •H 0\ 0 0\ H .8 ' . . ... C-. \.0 0 N- \0 ^ t...._ \D 0 C- •-• r- ,--1 t- • • -,- I j 1.-• . . 0\ (ll 0 • /4 \0 X 0 01 .;- - '.. t•-- 0 0 Pq 24 r-i tt rd CO ' H ,„_ • N .;,. . - a. c0 CD 4-) C._.) Q.) G4 40 H CO 0 •, '4•41 : . C ' 4r! ' : i CO 0 4) Pq ... Cr) H r ..L) (1) : k-) ; ' • CO N- (.1) r-1 W • 0 0 • rd t.. A._ ';' E ' vl • o tz (, (fl , Lu • , 1 000 -p 0 -10 "1-.) 0 4:::11 • N • .‘,..'. J) . : rr; . 0 -:: 0 r-t..7 r-I C\1 - 0 --• II\ ' ' 1--4 4-) i--I H cc SS s-4 0 1 u) 3 F4 0 • • \C) taf) cd H a‘ ^0 0r1 ix\ j , _.- 0 i.r\ 0 t--- c0 0 0\00 - c)--.1- in,:-..3 01- , .... .., t-__ o 0, cc . ci • On • LI1 "S I (' • 114 t-- 0 LC\ in ""••• • r-1..t 0 • LC\ 1-1 0 .7 .\ Ni _i. LC\ 14 0 01 Z 4-4 In Z t•-• • C\J o N H N C.0 k..0 . • N 0 C.- CviO 0 N al N CV al I-11 • l•. 0 Cl) i-•IN r1.1 N II-IN (i) 0.1 ..- , -.... , in 0 U) in cr.1 (/) 0 cr\ cr..1 0 ii-:\-4- c.r\ ir-\u) — I H H . H H H . H H N H .- H Q.) N.I•. I-I L.0\ HO HO Z . . , H ;-4 0 H 0'-,-/ r--1 ••••.. .1-1 41 • ....., , . CO Z CO H CO 1:1-4 4 Z i ....... ----4 1 . f) , • f) " r , .. a) i_ 04 H . , ... z w al •H 0 a) card 0 Cll H 03 .,',•S 03 0 .1-1 OH r--1 U) 'dcc cc 0\ rd Q) 0 4 \C, •r-i ,. F-1 .. , 0 Crl r-i H t :•,34--i OH U) (1) 0 CI) El .rQ-CII h.; 0, H al •H H 0.) (4-• CO (1) o 4 rci ;-4 4-4 F-4 -p c +' E-' 0 X (1) Ci al ci '7) crl Ca ,---o 0 H .4-) PQ --. (ll (1) 0 • a) U) (1) ..e 0 i... Z:. , , i .23 •,-1 r-f . 6D H ci b.0 • 1-•-.) I--D cd Z al t•', -P 01 (1) Cd Li 1.1 0 Ill LC. ' cc (1) 17 .t..- Q. • i a) a) P4 ,4) -P c.,. N 4-4 4-4 \.0 ) I) r-I '.• •--I I Cd-..1" 4 O\ I N . a) ..-i 0 OC) C1) LC\ • H cc-) ,•,--i is\ t t.c.o -P 0 0 0 +3 0 (1) 01 .1k Cj 0 X > CV Ci N Ca ir, M Crl -., • 6.c=.Yd. '. _1.• t "3h?1►+ • I' S 1•171 a : i.. ®i efa 1, W ,"►fat Q '• , 0 y 1 z , I ' . Q I.��I Zi te0 O F--- cc re - -) • Q\ c\J 01 H 01 IC) °L �' U` co r\ N- • cry fi � l<1..)11 - O �_ O O (..` O O O LU IO O O _i' r-i r-I O ( I I O O O O O O I 1 I CO1 I I ul c0 Z u\ N O r-Ir-i M J I I 1 N Z Z 00 H �� U: 01 r� cn c�1 I kN N p r-i N N N !-i O\ M N N N r0 t� tf\ S-4 l 1 tr\ O • r-I in U\ i.t u1 it I 1 W I O HI U N I 1 3 d CO • O U) CO CD CO \O 3 if\ ix Li\ C!] CO r-• .4 `r� Q O -F) +, O W O W Z •O 3 O O 1 -- 0 - :. M ' - O\ U) 0\ CO W O\ U) Ol is 01 is\ A I ; •--i Z c,, l- 4-, O\ • t`- ^ C- 4-i Z t11 r--, i.. L'- co t---_I O 1 0 .•' N O • N N 41 LI'\ N O ^O N. 3 N N \O P4 I - kr\ N O O u\ • eel Cn -7 4-1 r-i • F- U] N 1 1 n ) c-- 3 �"\O tf\ tf\ Cr) .1- O\ - ' O\ C.) U -') G i p' f-1 • 3 U) tf\ N • H r-i ..7 .7 rn i N ^ ,-I 1 �- O U) \O O N U N , 0 O 1 ' ir 1 C7 CO n N oPt • C2 U \O 0 H Lr\ 0 0 0 • --I N- < -7 0O• , L\ C_) � H N- CJ H • U 0-4 -7 u\ - N- - CO O\ Jl d , • N) O\ • Q\ • O\ •\0 ti C� 0 H \O \O Q\ ,.1... -- rw4� rw � ,w +) 0\ o0 ' 1 N Z O N Z Z 0 N Z N D N 3 N 3 N 0 n 1 I N� Z to tto Nr3 Pq 4) Nr-it • N N N E -' tf\ Cu u\ N- a) LA U] 0 N it\ C31] c0 c0 Lr\ 0 t!\ 0 u\ 0 I j H • • W H Pa •HH N-. HO r-♦ Lc\ H O 1--IO r-I\0 H O t!\ H O 3 • r-i H H H H r-i — I ' F' CO P4 \0 N +> 00 P-k +•) c0 P4 nl- tr\ Ni to Ni co W i j) ' .1J ./) i...- 4.� i ' 0 Fl. rd z • t CO r_i In J pa H O z r-I ".4. C•1 XF ,o (1) 0 a) q.., cd 00 0 - +o' ;7- W {: N 0 O , O S-• • r t v I--j C•'1 -� x; C7 _ ll 1 .{'04+ rrlY41 '�►. .:t".kuhlt--". •: 4,..n^"'�►`^.77.7757.7 a. _-t7-7"...�s.::>.7'7.777-:: ;.;1 y ,'" Z= 7.• , ''t'ti11+v'.10;44400,0"0;4,0• v_, .r Q 1- T f- F re Zi r r- -- - W � ' N r W N v I 1 •. ,-•IW <,7 iZ� Oa O j�al X41 I-- [ u.iLel F- 'W C 0 0 oc N- M o O '....• o O ;. I--- I C - - N ., 1.► _ i-_____ ,H 1-- CT= -- o -- 0 o d, 0 . I ^ I l._ I(\ H 01 H C O'1 4i H i u\ 0 0 0 ON O ' 1 1 H I /1 i I-10 N � Cr) C.0\l C-) CO H ictLN N •3 • N ^ t- I 4 u V\ . \ U] N In In • � v I I 0 I Ov I 0 • b0 .. ,:,, < -I Co Co ^ co U 0 N E'' i '"� 0 0 �+ 3 0 Lr (Yq E_+ r1 r O\ H O\ 0 CO W H Z a: I I'~ I 0 I Ca 0 ....-.10 O_ (\J t -r) W N W PCI N 0 � 0 Cr F-'74 I- HZ 4+ W Z W `— i7 a• O -7 40 0 0 0 ''! Wv u Ii H •r- cog Jaz Cl �' ' 1 o >' Ho ' N W i O r I . tom. CZ \O Z M N In O t--O ±. - t11 Com-C0 1 •N H (• U O r-i • O � v rW W 7-4 N O 0 N N N N I IO N _ •-I N rix • N,-I ^ E— I u\ 0"0 u\ Z ( It\ u\ coctom- 0 C H L.r\ ri ri r 1 N H LA HH r i H O r•i O W 0 c0 W U C0 P. a0 P.--I Z - Wcn tn Q 1 0 44, C\ ! I i I 0 • •W t d ? +' fa r o m > Cr4 3 0 Pq -ti cd O b (I) •H H Cd *r- + o a, s-1 cd a, C S. CV ''DO cd J cd x H Z H O\ r-I N tll --f r i O (tel H t` a0 • I • ON 41 O •H O cd H a Cr) 3 m P. 1 fisi177:7 . ,1.. -'fit . y. =R...,=7:t ---�,•.r + a...-. IMMEging,17=-""..„ .. .., :&,,sr...7,,,',/,,,,. 4#3401•Iik .. •' - -• .T.WWWIWIL.'%,'"It. - vit!coiorkPie- .o , , -***,, ?;•10.;:,• .• - • ....J - 4 i 0 Nr. I- 3 3. I... &AI C7- • ti),• • . , , . " . . IL tr) vl '1 1 H - . i r--1 t I H w Z< cc 0 u_0 ——— --——---—---- X ...... n a, ,--- rn H 0\ 0 CD 1,1 0 . . I ...... -•• L H '-; I-1 i---4 _ .._ ---- ---------------------- - - - --- - - - ..0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CI) 0 ':3 0 U I U) I 0 I X (.-/ D , .-„, . . I - (11 Z (Y) 1-4 - - 0 Cr) ,-../. CD .-/- CV cri l). N be N N X 1,1 , , tr. Z LIN (II if\ CH • u -,-1 I I 0 , _ <I.:al — -.-1 I 4 0 rq 0 •ri 0 0 H 1 - t 0\ H 0\ i 1 1 " 0 ,'4 N U) N • N - N 1-4 '4 - T :-:_?, ,-- _ ,-.- '-, ....... Cl) t.0 .H ET-3 Ce- ! -i Cl) 0 L.) I ---4 cH •H :-;-"4 ▪ i E vs I 0 1- rr-• c,-) 1 '---) 0 s 4 „ -, ,.1. f) a '.! _ ...i- - - .-,..t -.----. a\ 3 LiN 01 03 1f\\0 ',"7-. 0 If 4 •.'• Ci) • t- is\ If" r-I Lr‘ • D (i) < .. 'r_) - If\ H 3 •,,, L. ;1, (-) Cr) (11 0• , I c\J t \D (1.1 0 N 0 N f) Cv 0 H cv (Aj .r1 .., ... LrA (3\ t.r _ LI\ 0 i_r 0•0 H --I- - H co :.4.. — 0 L,('\--1 0 UN 1.1.1 CO 4.1 C-) It.-- 1) I . 1) Li 0 4 • C.: ,7 ,r- ..N . , ,--. OL Lu . I .... ...---.. •H Cr) • 0 or) • rd . 0 a) ,-1 H 4-I ----- ra cn i •H -C • nzi 0 * .- . 1) ai rC.. CO CD ( a) • ,„ u, '71 t10 ,.•, .H C'3 N; '5' j rti a:3 r'll :4 I:: 7103 cd r:i in cd r=) L1\ •r-i Lf\ 1 0 (N1 CO CO d c0 t e J a 0 P. 9 ri cv 1` 0 rd Ci.: tr ,i) Lki 1 ' { W . '. O< (' orO rn u-O 1r F— LL V )-- f., `,; W c •. Ca a - S C -- w E w O pc a. Ci3 ,,; < z f�7 0 r — i-i a V . x ce W I i U U.) cj 0 ae (J) . 0 ;', lL 'n n d w cn Li.) „` co coQ J ro 1 oc W Z 1 ° N 4 vH N Q.) no cd 7 . ...,,1.. '..rd.:. A �, - -- �i n f r ,f''ll - �.! � a, rniV , k ''1 '*"' ata ,,'- .+. H �L• CO .J N N- Q F. rd O �- (II cO a N �" d Q) lifC Q) i U n i Y Cd W N a) N I �� lH I �I H 1-11%Za OCO o W U O --- — - Ck li ! CO Q O 0 [- _.? N 0 Rt C { W 1 o, a :=. r- 0 H o C.: �Q C� — N I.r� E"" Q ON LIN ON CV CV HC I W ^�� H 1E 00I • 00 O O O w i~ O O W r-1 f1 in I N m 0 OO a3 0H 00 0 0 rIII CJ (rlCV NCU 0 N 0 0 a- 0 ) N S•i N N \O N N Ir-ri inI Q tr\ � i u1 — N-7 0 l- [�-- C— ail t t--- 0 [� W a 0 0 0 0 0ZZ ,-4_t JC 3 H N- ti N-CC `- p. CU N N N H a CD •Ca X U) (f) .--IN U) rn 0 (I) a) W a) ) m a) • ti a) s r-I UU N7 '--1t) E l U U di U U !-, 4-1 U a. U) r- W P Q a) � d-3 d O Q W , CO c') o 0 P 0 d 0 0 U N - CO X U N O Ce �i 0 C` <4 • CO • O 4-I N•IIx H M 0 H to O) C3 O1 U) ^ Irk H H G ��; m H ,-Kv LL E 00 1-1 N N W W CV Z Cl) C') - a) cn Ca , .r Nr-Ix Nr ix O a Nrix N H Cn u, W II`, :3 (0 ..:3-1 ,_Ix ~- !li co Iin W W If\ Cl) H .-- U 1.11 (l) Cl. (1) • LC 4 ;3 LP\ d H u) H H r-- H 3 > H (I) H C .7 Ui H.-,x Ix r-1.-Ix H.-Ix cd H rix H r-IN Lid d 0I [- C CO u• N- Cf) N-C- CO o c5 r- m 3 N- oN C W 0) Cr) Q 7- m o , cro o ;i Cn Cr) Z 4-i ,A O, to o c co co �, ,r) 4:48 O in Ir\ C.7 ao O b z � H u1 • .- d M r •H In H O H �. _ rd d a)3 cd s4-4 H ,--I a) O �. a) u S r u > W CD GrI a:3 (1) ^ C. -+' 4-I 0 cd (1)P. xc a) J cid a) 0 cd a) v) N G 0 0 0 0 ` O C)) .,--1 O a) oO x D 0 O . i> rd C— ai 'a0 CO c3 cd 0 0 P. a) . W H U) ) C) cn rn C-[ '1-1 W cd CL. 4 Q f- 1 O 1 , i- _ Z 1 in I 4 «; Z i i 1 LII Z a0 I& Cie t— j ® CL c0 I Q CO CO LU U..1 w o 0 WQ u� as • .-1 o �I 0 0 o 0 CL pl C . k4 a - w N N C w w ii ,n W v Z •-1-7Cn o 0 ."J ti Q Cr 0 a' z 0\ ON as a. o � mz N civ w cc H s v eL 3 En- r-I tV11 H Q O Q b U ? CY 0 Q r- lZ O Q u-, N rI O • ® H C. C.) N Cf) . CO U] v Ll.. � Ci) Cq N C\J CW W 1 CO G, Cl) N.-is Q w (NU o H i 1,..- > 1H Z N i.r\CO C E+ r{ \ W d a0( H c N-, rCO w CC) rI Lf 1 E , . j v) , U) w co 1 Q 0 1 co //�� V\ a W 1 Z 0 4D I •0 { I W .... . •H _ �j 14-1C O N P.; cd a J Q 0 g I- Z cW Oi Y1 H W H VI 4 3t (01 14/ Z� OC 0 x u.O 4 1 1- ce /n it - vi L., C. m W -- ' E LLJ °e Cl. x ' E c) z i+I 0 Q PiQ z `. a V '-' W mai u CO w ,--i O `y u W 7 v (I) cn 0 H (n C a+ v W - m E CO ------ w � CC 4- O aD ccZ 4. � 01t • E # Cr -i C) U EH . 3 4- ; • t )41:44-*:4 '4( I C . 1 .. 1 C.% Lil 11,• Z cn 0 l— ot u"0 ta- 1/4.1 ce LLI L:) ot F-- ; C LU wE > ; 0iJ u E (-J — H Z ' —J 0 1 cr 1W c u i:4 cn0 Cle :121 rff;) I kL CI) (49) C ) w E (i) w Ho I cc ! 0 co ac I14 0 (4-4 0 ••-t C.) t1D Cd f:14 • 6) 0 H N CO Ct Ln (0 N c06) co1- Ct 71- 7t I- 71- 71- Ct t 0 LU N CO s z O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O pin in cr) O O V_ v 00 co oo c0 c0 a0 c0 CO CO CO a) co co a) c0 • 0) 0 Ct CV) r) 0 0 0 H (0 0 N Ln 0 0 in 0 0 0 .-I Ln 0 O N CrO N CO 6) O • • in N 0 0 co CO N Ln 0 N 0 O CO N 0 EH a0 LU H (0 (0 0) N 0 N 0 6) Ct a) Ct in N LU (o N in In Ct p H Ct ,--F 0) ri N N CO U 0) N .-I U) UU • H Q) C 0 () C • •r1 0 > •H 0 o a) 0 cd f-, a) 0 • C a) .0 6.i a) cd - a .� U) . o _ U) a) .0 U E b O 0 a) Q) _ • a E z Gi � a �I H o EH Ute) a 4 0 0co 0i1 W o4.1 0 C- •,-1 o 3 CI C U) cd O U) •P X o s� H 0 a) 4-) a o o H cd o cd a) - ..-.: - O a) ,_i z. on H U1 z ,-) 0 CI 0 44-I 0 0 1' > 0 W 0 c X a > ci cd cH cd✓ o (1) a) cd cd (1) a 4 •� a) -i z _ H 3 Z E • -+ o a a Ca X Cl) 0 '-.) a a) U) U) U) U) U) 4-) U) U) U) U) 1.) 1) (1) U) •r1 CI O 0 0 .0 1-) 1.) 1J 0 a) Q) El 4-) Q) (1) 0 0 0 0 O o • a) fL H I U) E E •r1 a) a) Q) (1bD cH E H I-) a) a) E E E E E _ :n >)1.) a ci O > > al >1 a > - = - x cd C a cd O0 0 C U) cd U) (d U) cd U) cd 0 x 0 xa o a S c E -' a +-' a, 1-) 0. 1-) a �, ,Uy') al) U) >< C a a (1) •r1 •r1 •r-I •H a H CU cx25 sa 1 , Q cd U) H E E -0 m1.) U) 1.) mi) m1) o U) :1: U) H H a) cd H H C O U) O U) O U) O U) U) H •H (d - _ e O U) a) bp cd •r1 E O a a) a a) a a) a a) '0 C - .0 H U) ci ci S- S-i 0 a) fi a) ci a) i Q) c tf-� 1, - a o s Q_) › °� H °) .0 .. a Q °1-' Q -) Q Q °) CH , 0 a� 0 J C cd o cd cd cd J-) H H E E C E O o H cd - - -+ Ha C U) U) 3 0 0 > 4H4H4H4H W Z - - r. H cn r 0 o) cV) HLnOcV) LnLn c 0 NO 000Ln 0 0 LnCt 0 Ct co co 0 O 0 coo OcoocoocO0co Ct 0 NO HU) N O 0) 0 j [gyCO 0 0 0 HLn • in N6) CtLnN6) in 6) c'o N0 N 0 in cr) N N 0 O coH N 0 0 ao c0 N N N0LUNHCtNc0 N 0 Ln c'0 H N o0 0) 6) (D c-I CD (O 6) Ln C7 r I N 6) r 1 CO CY) p CYo Ln N CO (O N .. •. ., r-1 r-i CO ri Cr N CO cr H 0 a) N • 00 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 0 0 00 0000 0 0 ri H c-I .-i ,--i . ,-I H .-i H ,-I r•1 ,-•1 H H H H ,-1 H H--I H H H H H H H H 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 s H H r-i e-I ,-1 H H H H ,-I c-I ,-I r-1 r1 r•i r-i c-1 H H ,-I H H r-I r-1 r_I ,-L ,-i • • (0 (O ,-I r-I ,-I a) N CV) LO a0 a0 Ct Ct 6) 0) H ,-i co cr) r-I ,-I r-I r-1 ,-I r-1 r-i H 4 U Ln 0 0 ,-i Ln N N Ln � Ct L "1"1- 7t Ln Ln Ln N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H H H H H H 0) H H OH 0 H 0 H 0 H H H Ln N N ao H Co H.1 H Q) a) 0) Ct (0 co 0) H d• Ct 0 6) O 6) O 6) O 0) Ct Ct ('o Ct (0 H (O r-I co co • . . • • • • (d H H ri H N ,-i (O N (0 0 4-1 0 H 0 H 0 H ,-I N H N N N H H H H $ a H H H H CO H 0) N0 O H O ,-I O H O r-1 0 0 Ln N N co H co H H ) I 0) 0) 7t- (0 ao 6) H Ln in 00) 06) 06) 06) in in co Ct LUHcH (.,) (V ) ao H N 0 H 0 N 0) 0) 0) O H O r-1 O r-1 O ,-1 0 0) 00 ,-1 ,--1 ,--1 ,-1 H 0 ,--1 ,-1 N 03 C) ,-I r-i r-I 0 O H O H O H O H a) H NN N N N N CV 0) a co co N 0) ,-I Lf) Ln Ln Ln CY) LOCO (OM (0 0) (O 0) Ln Cr) co co co co Co co co >) •Ct Cr 1 Cr Cr Cr Cf Cr Cr N Cr N Ct N Cr N Cr Cr Ct Ct Ct Ct Cr Ct Ct Ct 9 H • • . . • . . . . . • (o co H H H co N Co (O c0 a0 Ct 0) 6) H H co Cr) H H r-I r1 r-I r-1 H ,—I $. MM 0 0 c-1 In N N In .71' Ct Ln Ln Ct Cf Ln Ln In N 00 0000 0 0 1 c • o d- in (0 N CO N 00 n Ln LU Ln Ln (0 CO 11-'\14- L0 0 O 'O O co Co U Co co CX) oo Q) CO oo Co 0 N H 0 L` (0 N co In d' 0 co Co H 0) 0 CO H C) 0 CO N d' Ln 0 0 0) CO N in LO 0) co > Ln CO CO 0) CO N in Cl)•U (0 H TA- a) a) a) a) a a) a O 0 f~ 0 a)• RI a ) U) � Sa 4 > 'd 4 a) U) (1) 0 Cl) 4 I C I 0 H Y H o rn - c+-i - a 4-) 0 U) 4-) w b 06 •H al r-I ZH Cl • H Q • 'p E >) 4-) X O U) 0 .E U) (i) X H U a H (11 a) a) E E H •H b0 H El m c I bO 'H H H 'd x H H 'H H LL 1z � H N I cn .. U) H H CO 1-) CD fs CO O H H H H H S:-1 1, 1-1 0 = CSS 'H • 4 Cd S-.1 Q :.) 1 E E H >> c4 CO X a) CO a a 0 C') 0 0 N CO 0 (0 in c l) C0 CO 0 N H 0 N co NOtip Oao (.00) C) OHN CC) -+ N ('') Ln d- 0 CO co . 7 • N000NCOCON C3) C) CON N b0) 0 co o) 0 00 N d' H co a co LO LO CO CO (0 ' Ln D d" Ln 0 0) CO N in 0 ai uo N d' O N N in CO Ln Q) LO 0) LO Ln (0 CO 0) N N H N Ln CO CO H U) CO LD N Ln CO C") 0) H (0 CO H H ff? 1 {A - {:f1 'CI ' O 0 0 0 0 0 H H H H H H -0 't:S 0 U) 0 0 0 0 0 0 s~ [z .w U) H H H H H H 0 0 C .0 CO • • • LT-, 4-, U Q) E a) O Co CO 0 Co CO 1-) a) a) a) a) E a) ) -0 E > a) E 1, N 'C7 f~ H Cl) a) a) O > N U) H H H d• H H 'CI L: Z E E > g-1 O > a) co 0) (7) H CS) 0) t~ G_, a) a) o a g-1 0 5.4 Iw • 0 w 025 > > E a g-1 H CCS N H H H H H Cs. • O O a H E a j P-1 H H H d' H H H O z i- I E HEH ) I C") C)) C)) H CJ) a) > C j a) J-3 1.0 a a H • H H H .0 g-1a7r s~ E E 4-4Q 0 00 0 0 H O H CO a) 1 cl H H C0 CO 100 �1 • - O N N 0 C) N (n !~ • a N O I >) H 0) 0) H 0) C3) -1 a) 1 C i I d" Ln CPN COO CSS • >) Cr d• d- d• d• d• cti C'J '7 O x N S- H S. CO a H • 4-) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 H H H H H H 0 H H N CY) Cb C}) H Cr CO 00 H ) a ''7 0 CO CO 0 00 CO H OHN Nd d' LnLn LnL!) CO c /(q 4 / City of Shakopee / 14.0.‘ p, Kopft POLICE DEPARTMENT ,) t 4,‘ ' 476 South Gorman Street -� '1J SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 I4KQ -, ") 0 Tel. 445-6666 \, •O G E k'. .w 55379 I ' TO: John K. Anderson FROM: Tom Brownell SUBJECT: Therese Lenning DATE : July 20 , 1981 On July 21, 1981, Therese Lenning, police clerk, will have success- fully completed the six month probationary period. I recommend Ms. Lenning be granted permanent employee status with a pay increase, Range 3, Step 2, $840 . 00 per month. TGB:dmh CC: File NOTE : Pay increase to Step 2 as per Proposed 1981 Clerical Ranges . This Pay Plan was used after Jeannette Shaner' s Probationary Period . Council took action on that in March of 1981 . Action Requested: Approve the completion of the probationary period for Therese Lenning and authorize a salary increase to $840.00 per month. J o EWE _i0 20EECt iwnewpeir ".1 :s�:}i:=: •S7 0 QJ • .i 4i PROPOSED 1981 CLERICAL RANGES / Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Start 6 Mos 1 Yr 2 Yrs 3 Yrs_ 5 Yrs 10 yrs Range 1 618 650 682 716 752 790 830 Range 2 750 787 826 867 910 955 1003 Range 3 800 840 882 926 972 1020 1071 Range 4 890 934 980 1029 1080 1134 1190 Job Classifications Range 1 Public Works Clerk Assessing Clerk Range 2 Receptionist Range 3 Police Clerk Finance Clerk Range 4 Police Office Manager Building/Assessing Secretary Engineering Secretary Senior Accounting Clerk 9/23/80 lib MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Jeanette Shaner RE: Application for an On Sale Temporary Beer License DATE: July 28, 1981 Introduction I have received an application from the Shakopee Jaycees for a temporary 3 . 2 beer license for August 8 and 9, 1981 at the Huber Park Rodeo Arena. I am in receipt of a certificate of insurance in the proper amount . Recommended Action Approve the application and grant a temporary On Sale 3 . 2 Beer License to the Shakopee Jaycees for August 8 and 9, 1981 at the Huber Park Rodeo Arena. js • k� ee Fire D ShaDepartment SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 ji To: Mayor, Council, Administrator Re: Renaissance Festival Fire Protection At the request of the Minnesota Renaissance Festival the Shakopee Fire Department has consented to provide fire protection at the Festival site pending authority of the Council. The Fire Department will provide one truck (grass rig) and two firemen eachof the 13 days of the festival at a rate of $30.00 per hour. Hours of operation are 9:30 a.m. through 7:00 p.m. on the following dates: August 22-23, 29-30; September 5-6-7, 12-13, 19-20 and 26-27, 1981 . Thank you. Shakopee Fire Department Action Requested : Motion approving the Shakopee Fire Department ' s services for the 1981 Renaissance Festival . `�N1SOTA • a Ce J�; 'Fest�i � a�ys Ai ai RECEIVjy 4 1981 ... TM CITY OF SHAKOPEE July 13, 1981 Mr. Harold Ring, Chief Shakopee Fire Department Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: 1981 Minnesota Renaissance Festival Fire Protection Dear Harold: The Minnesota Renaissance Festival will be held southwest of Shakopee for 13 days on the following dates: August 22-23, 29-30, September 5-6-7, 12-13, 19-20 and 26-27, 1981. Hours of operation are 9:30 a.m. through 7:00 p.m. , as in 1980. We trust that the Shakopee Fire Department will once again be able to provide the excellent service which they have been able to provide in the past and look forward to receiving a proposal from you in the near future so that we can make the final arrangements prior to the end of July. Yours siincer y, F7red J. Cor gan /General yr nager FJC:lnh cc: John Anderson, City Administrator ✓ Route 3 - Box 111 • Shakopee , Minnesota • 55319 - 612-445-131 1501 A 2:0CC 'frit/ it GP 41/ rViSt 6° 1 Pro (TM August 11, 1981 Chief Harold Ring Shakopee Fire Department Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: 1981 Renaissance Festival Fire Protection Dear Chief Ring: This letter will confirm our agreement to pay the Shakopee Fire Depart- ment $30.00 per hour to supply two men and one truck during the hours of 9:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on the following dates: August 22-23, 29-30 Sept. 5-6-7, 12-13, 19-20, 26-27, 1981. The truck will be located near the First Aid Trailer, which is located at the south end of the race track. Payment will be made upon invoice no later than September 30, 1981. This agreement is effective for the 1981 Minnesota Renaissance Festival only. Yours sincere -7, 1, 70S-, 0 U 7ro. J. C igan 9eneral -i°lanager FJC:lnh Route 3 • Box 117 • Shakopee , Minnesota - 55379 . 612.445.1361 1C4 MEMO TO: John K. Anderson, City Administrator FROM: Judith S . Cox, City Clerk RE : Easements for 80-4 CR 16 Utilities DATE: July 29, 1981 Introduction Pursuant to Council direction, condemnation proceedings have been started for easements needed to enable installation of the project . Background The Commissioners have met regarding the parcels in question, two owned by the Hauers and one owned by the Uelands . They have awarded the Hauers $10,300.00 and the Uelands $1 ,480.00. The property owners have agreed to the award by the Commis- sioners . Upon payment by the City to the property owners for the easements , the condemnation proceedings can be dismissed and the easements may be recorded by the City. Patchin Appraisals , Inc . appraisal of Hauer parcels was $8, 610.00 and Ueland parcel was $1 ,480. The Hauers did have one appraisal preparedin their own behalf but the Uelands did not . Recommendation The City Attorney does recommend payment of the award, if the City wishes to acquire the easements . Action Required Approve the payments of $10,300.00 to Eugene F. Hauer and Virginia Hauer, Jane Hauer, and James and Margaret Hauer; and $1 ,480.00 to D. R. Ueland and Dorothy L. Ueland, and The First National Bank of Shakopee , Mortgagee for easements needed for the 80-4 CR-16 Utilities Project . JSC/jam 11akupee Tummuuitg eruires 129 Levee Drive Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone 445-2742 Community Education • Parks • Recreation • Adult Education George F. Muenchow, Dir. July 10, 1981 John Anderson : Attached is an agreement Bill Of Sale from Larry Heinen, the owner of the barn being purchased for moving to the Jr H.S. site. Except for the incorrect county stated on the form for Shakopee, I believe that it is in order. Perhaps Attorneys Coller or Krass should review it. In light of my leaving in the morning on vacation, Jim Cook, Chairperson of the Eastside Park Committee will be following through on everything to be dome in moving the building. I believe that I have covered everything with him, the owner, and the mover. For your information: 1 . Jim Cook home - 445-5257 (Comm. Chmn. ) office - 44$-2612 2. Larry Heinen home - 941-3561 (Bldg Owner ) office - 544-4273 3. Bill Doepkehome - 941-1110 (mover) office - 941-1110 The building will be moved a few feet Monday night after Mr Doepke's men have removed the porch from the structure. As soon as possible when conditions permit at the site (one or two months ) the building will be moved to the Jr H.S. site. Jim Cook is making arrangements to expedite. C.C. : Jim Cook Cost of building - $ 2,000.00 John Cole Cost of removing Jim Karkanen porch & moving - $ 2,700.00 Lou Van Ho ut George F. Muenchow Action Requested : Approve the purchase of building for Eastside Park warming house and authorize proper officials to execute bill of sale in amount of $2 ,000.00. A COOPERATIVE EFFORT OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE AND SCHOOL DISTRICT 720 SINCE 1954 268—Bill of Sale. W.S.BOOTH 8,SON.BAKER BLDG.,MPLS.55401 SECURITY BLANK BOOK.366 WACOUTA,ST.PAUL 55101 BILL OF SALE inotiu Ott Olen bp Mete firetentg, That Lawrence E. Heinen and Nancy A. Heinen of the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota - _ , part 1ES-- of the first part, in consideration of the sum of . . TWO-THOUSAND AND. 00/100 ($2,000. 00) I)OLL.911'S to in hand paid by CITY. OF SHAKOPEE of the ('0110111 of SC* Ti and ,State.of Minnesota part icSof the.Seronii part,the rev, ipt !viz rr of is hereby acknowledged, do es hereby Crani, Bargniu, Sell and ('onley unto the part ies. of the second part, t heir executors, administrators and assigns, forever, the following described Coods•, Chattels and Personal Property, to-wit: One (1) horse barn, 24 ' x 32' two story, wood framed, presently located at 9840 Bennett Place, Eden Prairie, Minnesota. Seller agrees to furnish location on site for temporary storage (not to exceed two months) and to make available a road for egress from property to Bennett Place or Blossom Road. Buyer agrees to all moving cost from existing foundation to temporary storage location and ultimate removal from said property to Shakopee,Mn. • So Ambit anb to }Cjo[b flit *amt, Unto the said parties..of the second part, ..t.h...eir executors, adminis- trators and assigns, Forever. And the said parties.... of the first part for t h em , ..t.h eir heir execu- tors and administrators, covenant and agree to and with the said parties of the second part, ,.t he. .. .... executors, administrators and assigns that .t..h e ..... seller the lawful owner of said Goods, Chattels and Personal Property, and has good right to sell the same as aforesaid; that the same are free from all incumbrances, and the said parties... of the first part will warrant and defend the Sale of said Goods, Chattels, and Personal Property hereby made unto the said parties.. of the second part, ...thexecutors, adminis- trators and assigns, against all and every person and persons whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, subject to incumbrances, if any, hereinbefore mentioned. 3n Meistimonp Meted. The said partie.S_ of the first part ha ve.... hereunto set their hand this Ninth day of July, , 19 81 In Presence of Lawrence E. Heinen &Cry ge,(e...44, Nancy A. Heinen 1 tO co 0\ "' w N ~' 1Priority ii v1 1 Ut N \n `, co co I rn w o\ of CO rn Fund P., o 0 0 vi 0 o v, v, V1 cootl o w N H Program Number R, w O uu)) 0 uu)) H m • c] L3 U) M u) cn 0 c+ 0 H c m c ro f- • H• cam+ N. H. P H • P. MI 'i P. P g P Pw m w 0 w H• p B P p m c+ m w c c a c 0 a `� y a t0 a K a 1 a R, a R. c o R. Co n '� C] El'Idf) 1-1 0 0 I• 0 CD o 0 o c0 0 5 a o 0 H• Cn C) m m p, 0 Co c+ Co c+ co • 0 PI Co m Co° K cc+ 0 •• co 0 •, •• K c•+ • Cf O c+ Co Cf m c+ 0 C) 'o mco m Description H c -6e- W er )- P -69- £ -69- R -EA- -69- m -69- o 5t P cf C H C 'b N ON • w c~•+ w c+ N Coc c ¢0 O W ON VI 0 N N 1�i 0O, O < H 0 P 0 'Y VVI vfi 0 p, W 0 m O R -J 5 .. o 0 0 c+ 5 c+ O O 0 0 Cl)0 0 0 0 O O O W O O 00 0 0s-U 0 N O O . 0 P O 1 O0 OO OG —1 0 r-, CD P `+ • v1 P F'' : Fd v, reasibil.it, : oo [report: g 0' • ON SPDC o y : co pproval to m Co • m tr ....rt • �' .- Pub 1. is op m o Ilea .i n�� 0 u C m 0 • o (DPlans and1-4 CO ''''Co Specificat ions O ;7' F t, v H 011b X v, Co• Right-of-Way w Acquisition y • O H H . O yv, • rn W �3 U) • co Bid 1 H . N H coco Date z H. Ci r m • • o, • . o3 IAssessmenL ••• w y ti, I--, ` Hear ng N H 'V O • • ta1 : ▪ O : o V, CO I-, \ Cornl)le 1,iorl ' } co • ccoo . co co • co •• CO H' (Date H • N) H H 0 • O • c+ '.s. 0 UI .., 0 W C) !II . () or ; Cj ui : ,) HI () b1 .. ,) UI H VD c' N .--O\ -----1CO Vt N H ~ H LA) r o ON--I VD co Engineer N O O 0 W N 0 0 H ON 0 CO \n N O O\W co 0 \O O\w o 01 H `e w -1 W-N-1 H N --I IND H ON VI I 'i'echnician I II a Co 0w0 00 \0 -J WW 0 -40 o - - ov, w o vio .g-Vi0 0 N N d co H W w H - n Technician II �' o COO 0I-10 CD H 0 0 00 O W owo 0 vi o 0 N N 4 o Inspector II c w I.,. c+ o' m 0 rn\_ri Technician I c+ o o owo o o\0 0 )o 0 HON- 0 0 N) o o N '.0 0 o Inspector I o x O H O O W 0 H H O coo H Ocr) ND H\N) 0 Co 0 0 N Vi C� Secretary ' rn H HN H \nom, Co N N W N H \.O H N W H N N H Total H o H 0 W \O\O o 0 O O O\W 0 O\ 0 0 O�j \O O 1 H H N V u Oro to H Vi - -- W� u0� �, O N I O\� �D 1� O 7 H O\. H �O O Ul fS 3 En ineerin I �� � -F o ov�i� 1 rn-`40., -g-0� 1 � w`o,., Dept. .Fee I • * * ISI rn- Nri - W H H H `° Priority I CO � \c H 'Fund vi v., `n vi \.n vi CD 0 \r, H n) H H 8 'Program Plumber P.. cm+ N U 0 m w U) H to w to w to o Cl) cF H c+ 0 cf G c+ i cF H c$- P N c c Cl) c+ c+ i-3 cc+ W c�+ c+ Cf H 0 Cl) a+ K P+ P+ a 0 a p a M P+ •D In, n c '-rj CD 0 a 0 pa+ 0 CCD 0 ~ 0 0 • P 0 0 m t7 m F'• m H Cl) m m+ c+ c+ O c+ c+ cO K •• 00 a; •••• c+n •• W c+. c. hi rD H N. Description II 3 t o II o 3 HH t7 (cD H C1-r c N' -N) @ H o N g H Cl) cn p cc N K effD 0 ON 0 0c3+ 0 O\ ='• O O N c 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 -c 3 0 • a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H• 0 0 4C 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 H 0 H r, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 POD 0- H. • -P- 0 td W t7 : cJFeasibilitY • m COmP C : Report H. ND I m M a a. m • coH_ 9 c~�+ N N :. a : c Approval t?' PF-+ H-' • 0-r H rn CD v, ON 1Pubiic CD H , Hearing • H II ' H M ° ' F., • --.1 ii rn Fd cc+,cn r O • O\ c I-4 v, .o- H✓ . Plans and ~' • a ra w c c a; Specifications c.: H , 0 • F-' H ro .. e.) Cri b ~'d ON 5 0 \ . right-of-Way • 11 co \ oc Cquisition '� P- g I m H m • ---.3" 0 0'\ rn --I v, • B i d • \ - -. \ Co • . Data O cf Co co OZ " H m . H H' f H H .. Cz : : M ; M ssessment• H H • w • H • H . HH co • a IA Hearing '� v-, •• .• .. .. .. b • 0 H • H HH \.o • �n co • H • I , . v, . rn • Completion HCo • c c • Co • c • c ; c . , ate " N I-1 .. H .. F-' .. N .. N c+ o 3ntr1 Xntx/ 3ntd anti z' ntzf Zotd XCW :htd cc H N HH H F H H o\ N H 0,, N 0\ n H N --I H W N O Engineer N 0 1 co 0 W 1 0 C0_,1 \O - 4 n N) N)VD � H °° 0 H H 0 0 0 H r CO N 0 H W H N rn H \O VI N WH technician III Cr H 0 ON Ol 0 0 0 0 0‘„,n H N A N N H -P'ON W 0 \J"0 0 0 O . b o H-' H o H H H CO--- ON Technician II ' 0 0 00 0 0 �pN� HJ N� 0 00W o nco 000 Inspector II ,� d tr R; W HTechnician I P 0 H 00 0 0H H 00 s 0Nc 000 0 CDN 000 Inspector I H M `c n H-' H N H W Secretary m n 0 VI 0 0 0 0 0\vl XPi 0I vi 03 -c vl W -''ON CO 0 W O 0 N 0 H--' VD W NV W N O _i N---I--, .__,1 H IVCoWW Total H 0 \O N1 Co N CO HBO N OWN 0 p O N O O CoW C • v7 H F O\ W N I H I Engineering I i--' ' I N " W CO Vo" v,01" H VI\11 I ON N I Dept. Fee O N 0 W N H �"O\ N vi N ("'`) OD 0 CO N I 0 I N 01 01 H O1 \O � N \n vi 01 1 • r * * td N-p-•-p-• W IND H o co -1 priority . II W 0 I I 0 0 co w I 1 Fund 0 P' Vl \n VI Vl Vl Vl Vl Nil w N INS o co (Program Number cim P' ti H L=J H t1 Z ti Cti t• t1 at' C) tri 1-ii X l Cl) 0 Cl) 0 Cl) nCD y m m o m O m Pt cm+ N• c+ H c+ I-, c+ h7 c+ c+ c+ � to 6- m 6 ' H. 0CD 0H• Re H. c c+ tOo O 01 cf. c+P CD P3 CD P3 Cl) P3 P P -.1PD, P `4 P m c+ CD c. 11 cC c+ t7 c+ c+ c+ N. t� y CD 0 CD c, CD Cn CD W CD c+ 1i CD O CD XI CD m P, c+ H P , H• P, c 0 H PH) P , O • P, H , o P., o om oCo , oaoa oc> D . m • C o 0 cm+ CD cm+ p cm+ c+ cm+ mm m Z c+ m w m C t7 Cl- c+ c+ • N• c+ W c+ (Cl .. o M Description II CD c+ H. H} Eft -Ea- 0 «H Ci E» N -0- -69- N -69- CO .P Co N N) CSD Lk) m N N• —1 I C.�. 0 W 0 Cl) 0 w H• -1 H• 0 P '-D 0 CO 0 0 Vl m0 Ci 0 OC 0 t7 00 V V V (D n 0 Vi 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 P O VD 0 0 0 tri 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O P' 0 C) 0 0 m • m • r. O 0 O O 0 O O\ O O P c+ : ,, • b : tD ,. coN °. opo • N o . JPeasibility Report c+ l) o w • W • N `+ : • ISA'PUCU N ' a ; • • : : pproval CO N N• • N •• N • a .. a' r• • .�- Cl) •• • .r=- • N : Public 0 • O\o CD • • :. co :• oD g , Hearin€*, � •-., N F N N .. tr 11 P N [r] Z • H b • • I-, H• Plans and o : o m • •; o • .`• : c+• • OND a • : oo •: OD Specifications 0 c). tri • 04 , N Cl P • •51rn . Right-of-Way c+ • 0 CO m • • Cop • Co Co H. : Acquisition y O - W c}. . .. .. W " N H c, •, tr CD n 0 3 m : -1 b : IB i d I •. .• p,• : : Co : Co co CD, • Date ,,• W N H �.. •. co• • O\ Co Assessment. o •• °` • co : co : co : : Hearing " CD .. •. •. w .. N •• H .. .. M N W 0 Cl) • • c• •: a\ : v, : : �Completion H H• •• co • • • co • co : a) : : ate CO ,• •• •. ., -p- .. N .. N •• a w X c w z a tz1 x a t o 7 CD td 0 td X a to 7 OD clO --I N rnN IN v~iH w H Engineer N N H H 0 .P" H 4 vi 0 0 H N '0 H' 0 0 0 O Vi N 0 0 0 0 O\ 0 0 0 Vi N O\ v C. N vi W vi OD H N H Technician III '.D VI 0 Vt 0 0 II N CT .F' -1 O Co 00 0 00 0 00 0 oVl O OO 0. co Vt OO H OO \.n " F-1 N N N O • Technician II 0 0 0 o vN, o rn Inspector IT d 00 0 0O 0 O0 0 0 H 0 00 0 vi vi 0 00 0 00 0 H. Q'• Technician I ‘.n "'.1 v, o Inspector I 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 O o 0 O O 0 0 0 I--, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01N Co o rnCI\0 -' w co `n ,c5 Secretary m rn o O O 000 000 N H-' 0 000 00 co 000 oW o N v u v co o ON O~\ N o o W w H Total O O O O \J1 I.., 0 0 p H1 W O O o ••••- co 0 0 N N N O\ --1 N -J 4 W I I • H I I rn H I I Co rn v, �- I I co o 0 0 rn Vi rn Engineering 0 0 I �- o, 0 0 ' HJ 0 0 0 H •P-•w w w Dept. Fee 1 10 Obl � 110 H-' N O I I V • • • • • 1 • • • * N N N n -a !Priority w cn 1 'Fund II •n •n �r1 to -3 0\ v, Program Number VD Co la oa m cn o w t7)7 tni '-• • txl P O P O 1) P t4 E4 cr 0' CD CD CD CD 0 c+ cP m P 0. P., a a `D H R' I P, 0 c0+ as C m 0 0 a W c7 a , 0 w o " CD 00 • 0 t7 m '• ° Ni 0 rn o ti o o WN c+ H c+ 0 c+ } + • 0 •. a c+ w Description GL oP { CD N c d `+ •O ‘....nN w coO co 0 o o a m 0 0 a o Lei 0 0 C o c+ o m 0 0 II tM O 0 0 0 0 o Fd ; : : . Feasibility c+ •. • •.: . .: . (• Report a • SPDC P • • • (Approval H. (Public P ; ; Hearing :; Ni O 0 • Plans and ti' w (Specifications C' LI • Right-of-Way H : : cquisition H Cx. H o : •• • • (Bid :. :. :. :. :. :. :. Date 0 t Assessment •-‹• : : : : Hearing o H completionH ate 2 epa rate : a td Dui ow 3atri Xatzi 3 atd V~1 `+ HiO tC ct `F cN vN, Engineer H H. V1Vn N N 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 VD 4 Co O f-' c+ O N H C oo N Technician III P ,D t 00 00 oN 0 000 00 �„ c-i N P c+ N cy\--1 iv P N V, Technician II N' °N �� o ~P• 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 o Inspector II d N. C. D7 d `D c+ 0 Co I Technician I H. H H. 0 0 0 0 0 VD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Inspector I H-J H VI N H c+ '1 ' 1-1�t1 1-"Da, O H H \~1t v~i N �O O 0 0 0 O O O Secretary N O\W O N I� O\ I-' H' .-' O Total CoVD 0 � Cr O\ -I - N P H 4 0 OO 00 � cD 'i �i n 40. 1-' • N. c+ 0 I I CO 1 1 VO Engineering w N Da H H N N 0 I o o o o Dept. Fee - cD V1 V1 N N N .C' O 0 o Oa O O\O\ W W N O\ I • cam+ td N Nrn w o Program v./1 W HII Number • edPL, or p o 0 to 0 N p•o ii u) w• o o c+ U70 R. H CP (•] Cl) tn II c+ lo c+ CD N• H a c-) U • 6 P c+ P 0 N • • •• tD i-',-1 Po m o o ;• •• K H • • • q b C • N. 7 r. H cf IA O 3 0 Cr, 3 C) I0 3 C) td 3 CJ ix: 3 0 tx1 3 0 W ; w y ") N I 1 1 1 1 1 I Engineer0\ •--4I I LA) t 1 I N 1 I I 'pw I 0 V I - \n I C 0 i 0 0 I N N I . - I 0 0 I— ko �- I I I Technician III 0 cr 001 001 000 I 001 00 I 0 —.11 00 I 001 3 I I I I 1 I I 'Technic ian IT m o �n I 0 N I 0 '0 i o I I 0 ,) i 0 -1 I 0 � I 0 0 I Inspector I I •1 P i Iw N• r' c' n 0 I I I I I I I Technician I F� O o i o � i o 1 0 0 ry 1 OF- oiv 1 0o I o�o i .lnshectot• [ o K O\ O H I 0 0 I O C I 0 I 0 0 1 O H I N co 1 �"O 1 Secretary Cl) v H CO H t I I I 1 i N I N 0 op I a\a. 1 - i Tot,a1 '0 0 1 o v, 1 --I rn I o '- I 0 H I N\o I MON i -P-rn I N I I N 1 I I N 1 '' I 1 N N I I - 1 N I -' 1 I .P- 1 O N I 1 O\N 1 I Engineering ND �w 1 Io n 1 w rn I IO C 1 I N 1 0) o 1 N)CDODI I -P-0\ 1 Dept. E'r�' • bi w I- N N I 0 .F- o Program II "' H 0 `D °' Number bj P.• oa rn ZCD l'i p c+ (Ti P. `� c�+ 0 U) (Ti'1 E. CD 4 Po ~ HH H IS P. ' a 'd 'z7 O O N 0• I-' Pa 0 'd En n (Ti (Ti p c+ 0 c+. c+ fD 0 r 11 c+ '11I-, 0,4C '0 `� Co a. as O H w rn o1w P go co g Fes-' :. . P 'd m o •' •• • •• In z o •co to 3 H• t.- (D :d [D to tm .. •• •. 'd vi F-3 N Zorn Z0bd xow Sow ... <- :; otv .: c- w amu! 0 1---, I 1 I N I I 1 I ► 1 ngineQr . - I W I N I v1 I I I I H I I H O I N ' I H co I ..--H I W vl I O O I O W I Ui co I N C\ F' I I I IJ I I ' I I 1 Technician 1:1 I a co I I I O 1 I O O I OOI o N I 0 0 1 • O W I 0 0 1 0 H 1 D H `J I-, I I 1 I 1 I ITechnician 11 �r' _- I I vi v� I H v7 1 N W 1 I W I '. I0 r t r 0 0 I 0 O I •r-'\O I N W 1 -1 I 0 \0 I A H I 0\ -J I n S peC t or i) '1 W r• (-' cr 7 C I I I I I I I I 'Technician I c' I I I I I I H I -0\ 1 • • 0 r, 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 -" I 0 0 1 0 0 1 Oen 1 0 I .1.nspectol• I a [-, x N I-, 1 I I -P 'O I I •I I I K 1-' -p-• I 0 U) I 0 0 I O\I-' I OD OD I 0 0 I 0 0 1 0 0\1 Secretary n t-- I I I I I I N 1 I I H -- I I II H 1 N 1 - I vi I H O 1 W \n I I--' 1 +I H 1 iotal N 1-' I N N I \-o --a 1 N 1-' 1 vi O I O N 1 vi v3 1 HN..ri 1 H -F" I � I H I N W 1 1 1 1 --.11 ' N I H I \O Co 1 so 1 N I-so . 1 vt co I 1 N 1 --� 1 N '.0 I I''r1gitIC,'r1tl -w I v, 0' I �"H I -� --a OD rn i 0 H 1 CO\O 1 - o Dept. Pee o - co .--- v, 0\'.0 W N 1 w v, -:' -� U) / c_ MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John K. Anderson, City Administrator by Judith S. Cox RE: Building/Assessing Secretary DATE: August 3, 1981 BACKGROUND: We have been advertising for the above position to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Phyllis Knudsen. Ten applications were received and two individuals were considered for the position. Both Jeanette Shaner, our receptionist , and Cora Lee Underwood are very desirable candidates for the opening. After careful consideration of the two candidates by Mr. Houser, Mr. Martin and myself , it was determined that Ms . Underwood was better qualified because of her knowledge of legal descriptions and her general legal experience. Because of her experience and qualifications , I am recommending that Ms . Underwood be hired at the Step 3 level of Range 4, $980.00/mo. She has been offered this position at this rate and has agreed to accept it , should the Council decide to hire her. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Cora Lee Underwood be hired for the position of Building/Assessing Secretary at the rate of $980.00 per month and that she be considered for an increase upon successful completion of her six month probation. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Hire Cora Lee Underwood as Building/Assessing Secretary at a salary of $980.00/month with a salary review upon successful completion of six months probation. jc Aachrnefi - /pP/icafio1i of GUra Lee- Uriclerc�oocS / 5 rtfained 5e/oar-Se/I Qs pri✓a/ cifQfq • PROPOSED 1981 CLERICAL RANGES Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Start 6 Mos 1 Yr 2 Yrs_ 3 Yrs_ 5 Yrs 10 yrs Range 1 618 650 682 716 752 790 830 Range 2 750 787 826 867 910 955 1003 Range 3 800 840 882 926 972 1020 1071 Range 4 890 934 980 1029 1080 1134 1190 Job Classifications Range 1 Public Works Clerk Assessing Clerk Range 2 Receptionist Range 3 Police Clerk Finance Clerk Range 4 Police Office Manager Building/Assessing Secretary Engineering Secretary Senior Accounting Clerk n /' ykAh