Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAugust 16, 2016 RESOLUTION NO. 7757 A RESOLUTION SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF PUBLIC DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS WHEREAS, it has been made to appear to the Shakopee City Council thatpublic drainage & utility easements located at 2400Jennifer Lane isno longer of public use or interest; and WHEREAS, a public hearing must be held before an action to vacate can be taken and two weeks published and posted notice thereof must be given. WHEREAS, two weeks published notice will be givenin the SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS and posted notice will be given by posting such notice on the bulletin board on the main floor of the Scott County Courthouse, the bulletin board at the U.S. Post Office, the bulletin board at the Shakopee Public Library, and the bulletin board in the Shakopee City Hall. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that a hearing be held in the Council th Chambers on the 20day of September, 2016, at 7:00 P.M. or thereafter, on the matter of vacatingpublic drainage & utility easements at 2400 Jennifer Lane. Adopted in ________ session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the _____ day of ______________________, 2016. _____________________________ Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: ______________________________ Lori Hensen, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO.7756 CITY OFSHAKOPEEMINNESOTA , RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR FUNDING TO COMPLETE ITS 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE AND AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR PLANNING ASSISTANCE GRANT FUNDS WHEREAS the City of Shakopee must review and update its comprehensive plan as required by nesota Statutes section 473.864, subdivision 2; and WHEREAS , on April 27, 2016, the Metropolitan Council adopted need-based eligibility criteria for awarding available local planning assistance grant funds and established maximum grant amounts for eligible grantees to help grantees review and update their comprehensive plans as , subdivision 2; and WHEREAS , the City is an eligible city, county, or town in the metropolitan area as defined in Minnesota Statutes section 473.121; AND WHEREAS , planning assistance grant funds will be made available to eligible applicants subject to terms and conditions contained in Metropolitan Council grant agreements. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that, after appropriate examination and due consideration, the governing body of the City of Shakopee: Authorizes its Department of Planning and Development to: 1)submit on behalf of the City an application to the Metropolitan Council for Local comprehensive plan required under Minnesota Statutes section 473.864; and 2)execute on behalf of the City a grant agreement with the Metropolitan Council for planning assistance grant funds. Adopted this ___ day of _____________, 2016. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ William Mars Lori Hensen Mayor, City of Shakopee City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 940 CITY OF SHAKOPEE AN ORDINANCE OPTING-OUT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 462.3593 WHEREAS , on May 12, 2016, Governor Dayton signed into law the creation and regulation of temporary family health care dwellings, codified at Minn. Stat. § 462.3593, which permit and regulate temporary family health care dwellings; WHEREAS , subdivision 9 of those regulations; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, ORDAINS as follows: SECTION 1. City Code, Section 151.007, General Regulations is amended as follows: Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings as defined by Minnesota State Statutes shall be prohibited in all zoning districts. OPT-OUT OF MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 462.3593: SECTION 2. Pursuant to authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.3593, subdivision 9, the City of Shakopee opts-out of the requirements of Minn. Stat. §462.3593, which defines and regulates Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the _____ day of ____________________, 2016. CITY OF SHAKOPEE MINNESOTA By: _____________________________________ Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: _______________________________ Lori Hensen, City Clerk Legend CSAH Designation MSAS Designation MSAS Addition MSAS Turnback 0.897 miles (4,738.5 ft.) 1.393 miles (7,358.4 ft.) 1.128 miles (5,957.9 ft.) 0.142 miles (753.5 ft.) CSAH System Addition: CSAH 69 Miles 00.150.3 (Old Brick Yard Rd) & New Alignment CSAH 16 (17th Ave W) CSAH Revocation: CSAH 15 (Adams St S) Scott County City of Shakopee Date: July 7, 2016 MSAS System Addition: Turnback & New Mileage CP 15-12 Turnback Agreement County of Scott City of Shakopee CITY OF SHAKOPEE SCOTT COUNTY TURNBACK AGREEMENT COUNTY HIGHWAYNO. 15 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this ___day of _______, 2016,by and between the City of Shakopee, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the “City” and the County of Scott, a body politic and corporate existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the “County,”both hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.” WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County seeks to reconvey tothe City,County Highway (CH) 15, from 760 feet north of the north right-of-way line of CH 16to6th Avenue West in the City of Shakopee,including all County owned right-of-way,as shown on Attachment1. WHEREAS, the County Board of Commissionershas the authority under Minnesota Statute 163.11 to turnback County roads to Cities; and WHEREAS, CH15 no longer serves a County highway functionnorth of CH 16 as discussed at the joint workshop of the City Council and County Board. The roadway primarily provides local collectorand B minor arterial access within the City of Shakopee to the north of CH 16 and serves less of a mobility function and, thereby, being better suited to be on the City roadway system; and WHEREAS, the County needs to maintain control of the influence area of the CH 16 and CH15 intersection to ensure proper function of the operations of this intersection in the future; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to transfer jurisdiction ofaportionof CH15 in an orderly fashion and have therefore set forth their respective obligations to accomplish this objective; and WHEREAS , the City has prepared a West End Study and has developers considering subdivision of propertywhich includesextendingCH16 from its current termini at CH 15 to the west concluding at CH 69. Page 1 CP 15-12 Turnback Agreement County of Scott City of Shakopee WHEREAS , as also discussed at the joint meetingof City/County/Township on March 22, 2016, the City agrees to follow the County’s access management strategiesand policies on CH 69andCH15to the south of CH 16 within the City limits to ensure safe and continuous movement of traffic; and WHEREAS, this includes no access on CH 69 between the north ramp and Vierling Drive and no access on CH 15 between the south ramp and CH 16 asthese highways both provide A minor arterial functions on the highway system. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AND HEREIN MUTUALLY AGREED, in consideration of each Party's promises and considerations herein set forth, as follows: 1.Transfer of jurisdiction of theportion of CH15located within the Cityas describedin Attachment 1and depicted in Attachment 2,shall be in accordance with Minnesota Statute §163.11. Full execution and approval of this Agreement by both parties shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of that statute.Transfer of jurisdiction is contingent upon full execution and approval of this Agreement,and adoption of a revoking resolution bytheScottCounty Board of Commissioners. The effective date of this transfer shall be August 30, 2015 if completion of the fully executed agreement occurs sooner. 2.The County shall provide the Citywithall available diagrams, as-built surveys, right of way information, traffic engineering documentation,and with copies of all active highway and utility permits, where applicable. The County shall provide documentary evidence of transfer of ownership to the Scott County Recorder at its sole expense. 3.The County represents and warrants to theCitythat: a.theCountyholdstheroadwayfree and clear of all liens, charges and encumbrances;and b.theCounty has received no notice of any action, litigation, investigation or proceeding of any kind pending against the County or the roadway, or any part thereof, nor to the best of theCounty’s knowledge, is any such action, litigation, investigation or proceeding pending or threatened;and Page 2 CP 15-12 Turnback Agreement County of Scott City of Shakopee c.theCounty has not entered into any contract or agreement with any third party which affects the roadway, the term of which extends beyond the date of this Agreement. 4.Scott County shall execute the quit claim deed necessary for conveying this segment to the City of Shakopee. 5.The County shall do a mill andoverlay, restriping and sign replacement prior to the release of the roadway. 6.The City agrees that it will not permit any new entrances other than those that exist as of May 1, 2016 on CH 15between CH16 and the Trunk Highway (TH)169 south ramp terminal. The City also agrees that the existing field access on the west side and residential accesson the east side of this segment will be removed when those properties are developed/redeveloped.See Attachment 3. 7.The City commits to compliance with the Minor Arterial access guidelines on CH69 north of TH169 and will not allow access between the ramp terminaland Vierling Drive. 8.The City and County will work together with development to ensure that CH16 is extendedbetween CH15and CH69as shown in Attachment 4. The roadway design will most likely be a two lane highway and must be built to County State Aid design standards. The County will allow a median and landscaping in the boulevard, if the City agrees to maintenance of these elementsand conducts the appropriate permit review for sight distance and clear zone.The final design will be agreedtoat the actual time of construction, givenland uses developed may impact traffic projectionsfor the roadway. 9.City shall assume all responsibility for the road upon the completion of the transfer. 10.The County shall indemnify theCityagainst, and shall holdtheCity harmless from, any loss, cost, expense or damage, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, directly arising out of or resulting from the County’s breach of any of the representations and warranties herein contained, whether such loss, cost, expense or damage arises prior to or after the date of this Agreement, provided that theCitydid not have knowledge of said breach on or before the date of this Agreement. Page 3 CP 15-12 Turnback Agreement County of Scott City of Shakopee 8.ThisAgreement is between the Cityand the County as the only parties and no provision of this Agreement shall in anyway inure to the benefit of any third person (including the public at large) so as to constitute any such person as a third party beneficiary of the Agreement or of anyone or more of the terms hereof, or otherwise give rise to any cause of action in any person not a party hereto. 9.ThisAgreement represents the full and complete understanding of the Parties and both Parties represent that neither Party is relying on any prior agreements or understandings, whether oral orwritten. This Agreement shall be modified, if at all, with the signed, written consent of both Parties. Page 4 CP 15-12 Turnback Agreement County of Scott City of Shakopee IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the Cityandthe County have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the day and year first above written. CITY OF SHAKOPEE (SEAL) ByAnd Bill Mars, MayorWilliam H. Reynolds, City Administrator DateDate COUNTY OF SCOTT ATTEST: ByBy Gary L. Shelton, Barbara Marschall, County AdministratorChair of ItsCounty Board DateDate RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL: By Anthony J. Winiecki, County Engineer Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Jeanne Andersen, Assistant County Attorney Date Page 5 CP 15-12 Turnback Agreement County of Scott City of Shakopee Attachments: Title Transfer Documents Attachment 1:Description Attachment 2: Turnback Map Attachment 3: Access Management Plan Between CH 16 & South Ramp Attachment 4: CH16 Future Extension Page 6 CP 15-12 Turnback Agreement County of Scott City of Shakopee Attachment 1 Description of Turn Back Commencing at Right of Way Boundary Corner B16 as shown on MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 70-15, according to the record plat thereof, on file in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Scott County, Minnesota; thence North 03 degrees 12 minutes 18 seconds West, along the boundary of said plat, a distance of 30.00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 29 minutes 48 seconds East, perpendicular to the east line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota, to the intersection with the centerline of Scott County State Aid Highway No. 15, said point being approximately 1480 feet north of the southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter, the same being the point of beginning; thence northerly along the centerline of said Scott County State Aid Highway No. 15 to its intersection with the centerline of 6th Avenue in the City of Shakopee and there terminating. Page 7 Legend Jurisdiction Scott County City of Shakopee 1.251 miles (6,604.9 ft.) 0.142 miles (753.5 ft.) Miles 00.150.3 CSAH 15 Turnback Attachment 2 Scott County City of Shakopee Legend D Access Removal when Developed Future Public Street Proposed County Right-of-Way Endpoint Existing Right-of-Way ! State Access Control !!! ! County Access Control !!! ! No Access ! ! Existing Roads ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 0125250500Feet Access Management Plan Scott County Community Services Division Between CH16 and South 169 Ramp 600 Country Trail East Jordan, MN 55352 Date: May 27, 2016 Attachment Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Legend Shakopee West End Study Area Principal Arterial A Minor Arterial B Minor Arterial General Planned Alignment Planned A Minor Arterial Planned Collector Alternatives Elevation (10 ft.) Existing Roads Jurisdiction GXWn Jackson Township Louisville Township City of Shakopee Miles 00.1250.250.5 Future Minor Arterial and Collector Scott County Community Services Division Roadway System Plan 600 Country Trail East Jackson Township Area Jordan, MN 55352 Attachment Date: May 13, 2016 RESOLUTION NO.7760 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ACCEPTING MULTIPLE $1,000 DONATIONSFOR THE SHAKOPEE FUN FOR ALL PLAYGROUND. WHEREAS, on November 6, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5794, which established procedure relating to the receipt of gifts and donations by the City;and WHEREAS, Resolution No.5794specifies that donations or gifts shall be accepted by resolution of the City Council, and shall require a two-thirds majority of the Council for acceptance;and WHEREAS, avid supportersof the City of Shakopee havegenerously donated$1,000 tothe Shakopee Fun For All Inclusive Playground; and WHEREAS, donationswillassist in constructing aunique playground that will provide a positive playing experience for all community members, young to old and of all abilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that thedonations aregratefully accepted; and FURTHER, the City staff is directed to send a letter to the donors, acknowledging receipt of the giftsand expressing the appreciation of the City Council. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, th Minnesotaheld this16day of August, 2016. ______________________________ William Mars Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: ___________________________________ City Clerk FundstransferredelectronicallyAugust4,2016toAugust16,2016 PAYROLL $ 291,939.10 FIT/FICA91,669.55$ STATEINCOMETAX18,339.99$ PERA80,292.66$ HEALTHCARESAVINGS11,439.83$ HEALTHSAVINGSACC T $5,320.78 NATIONWIDEDEFCOMP10,748.01$ ICMADEFERREDCOMP2,004.02$ MSRS3,075.19$ FSA768.25$ Total515,597.38$ Page 1 of 1 8/12/2016 8:43:45 AM CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 7759 RESOLUTION APPROVING COMPLIANCE DATE EXTENSION WITH RESPECT TO BUSINESS SUBSIDIES PROVIDED TO SHUTTERFLY, INC. WHEREAS, Ryan Companies US, Inc., a Minnesota corporation,has constructed an approximately187,000 square foot building for use as a manufacturing facility, office, and call center (the “Minimum Improvements”), on real property (the “Development Property”) located in the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the “City”), and Shutterfly, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (the “Developer”), leases the Minimum Improvements and purchase equipment in order to operate a manufacturing facility with related office, and call center space within the Minimum Improvements; and WHEREAS, the City, the Economic Development Authority for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the “Authority”), Scott County, Minnesota (the “County”), and the Developer entered into a Contract for Private Development, dated October 8, 2014 (the “Contract”), pursuant to which the Developer agreed to develop the Minimum Improvements and the City, the Authority, and the County agreed to provide certain economic assistance to reimburse the Developer for certain costs related to the purchaser of equipment needed for its manufacturing facility; and WHEREAS, the economic assistance provided by the City under the Contract is a tax abatement from the Cityfor up to nine years in the maximum amount of $758,771, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815, as amended, with an annual amount not to exceed $89,431, as well as sewer access charge credits from the City in the amount of up to $174,600; and WHEREAS, the economic assistance provided by the City to the Developer constitutes a business subsidy under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 to 116J.995, as amended (the “Business Subsidy Act”); and WHEREAS, Section 3.10 of the Contract includes certain job and wage goals to be satisfied by the Developer prior to the compliance date set forth in the Contract (the “Compliance Date”), and if such goals are not met the Developer is required to make payments to the Cityor reduce the payments received as described in Section 3.10(c) of the Contract; and WHEREAS, the Developer has requested an extension of the Compliance Date for up to one year; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City held a duly noticed public hearing as required by Section116J.994, subdivision 5 of the Business Subsidy Act on August 3, 2016, regarding the extension of the Compliance Date; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: 1.The recitals set forth in this resolution are incorporated into and made a part hereof. 484461v1 JAE SH155-316 2.The Compliance Date is hereby extended to May 27, 2017, and such extension is deemed to be made a part of the Contract. 3.The Mayor and the City Administratorare authorized and directed to execute any documents or certificates necessary to carry out the transactions described herein. 4.Except as specifically amended by this resolution, the Contractis hereby ratified and confirmed and remains in full force and effect. 5.City staff and consultants are authorized to take all further actions necessary to assist the City in performing its obligations under this resolution and the Contract. th day of August, 2016. Approved by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota this 16 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 2 484461v1 JAE SH155-316 Print PreviewPage 1of 1 http://gis.co.scott.mn.us/ScottGIS2.0/WebForms/Print.aspx?img=http://gis.co.scott.mn.us/ServicesTemp/_ags_8699f9e6.jpg6/2/2016 FILE NO.JOB NO.DRAWING NAME: FIELD BOOK PAGE BY:CHECKEDDRAWN BY:CHIEF:FIELDWORK REVISIONS ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY SURVEY FOR: Kimley-Horn & Associates SEC. 12 T115N R23W DETAIL 'A' DETAIL PROPERTY ADDRESS: Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 LEGENDLEGEND County Road No. 15 N SITE VICINITY MAP Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 1229 Tyler Street NE, Suite 100 WWW.EFNSURVEY.COM PHONE: (612) 466-3300 FAX: (612) 466-3383 N SHEET 1 OF 2 FILE NO.JOB NO.DRAWING NAME: FIELD BOOK PAGE BY:CHECKEDDRAWN BY:CHIEF:FIELDWORK REVISIONS ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY SURVEY FOR: Kimley-Horn & Associates ENCROACHMENT DETAIL EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE PROPERTY ADDRESS: N Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 County Road No. 15 SITE VICINITY MAP LEGENDLEGEND Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 1229 Tyler Street NE, Suite 100 WWW.EFNSURVEY.COM PHONE: (612) 466-3300 FAX: (612) 466-3383 N SHEET 2 OF 2 LEGEND PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT E T G N A E N I M A E R S DA E T OY T D I NL I MT ' U 0 0 D 1 N A ' 0 5 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PROPERTY SUMMARY RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 2015 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. TOTAL PROPERTY AREA24.31 ACRES 5 18 .35 D ' = ZONING SUMMARY 2 15E ' DRA 9 X. 33 INA' GAS GE & EAS 5EMEN 8.3T 5' 5" 9 UTI3.0 4 LITY1'6 EAS 3 EMEWWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM NT '' 28 3 6 L 0 EXISTING ZONINGR1B: URBAN RESIDENTIALPHONE: 651-645-4197 ", 1 =L = 1 D9 = 6 8 2 5. 6 2 .19 3.= 2L6 6 '8 ,0 . 21.84' R0 ' 0 = 5 5 91= 0 5 0 PROPOSED ZONINGB1: HIGHWAY BUSINESS 'R . 5D 0 U 0 . TR IA L 3I 'IN T YA 8 3GL E= 1E9 A 5 5 S&.9 . 2 E' SIDE/REAR = 5' M 7 E 'N 9PARKING SETBACKS T ' 21 65 TROAD = 15' 0N & . OUTLOT A E E 9 M G OUTLOT C FRONT = 30' 0 E22.19' A 4S N IA BUILDING SETBACKSSIDE = 20' AE 7 8 . 0R Y 7 ' REAR = 30' DT I '' LT 0I 5 TN 3 & .5 U .E 5 E 0 8M SIGN SETBACK10' G 0E A 2 S N IA ' E A 4 3 7R Y4 0 . 8. 4DT 'E I X'1 .' 6L 6 '0 I4 G6 A1 ST'4 E7 A .8 SU E M E66 N T. 9 LOT 2 7 2 PROPOSED AREAS T 7 N ' &2 E 9 E 9M .G E 0A SACRESSQ. FT. 7 N A I 1 E A R Y 503,120 DTLOT 111.55 I ' L 0 I 2 T U ' 130,245 3LOT 22.99 3 . 4 230.46' 6 1 0.8838,333 OUTLOT A 20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 47,481 OUTLOT B1.09 15.47' U T1116.80'60,549 OUTLOT C1.39 I5 L L ' = I D T 1 8 R Y 8 A.OUTLOT D5.16224,770 E2 3 I ANDRA INAGE & S A UTILITY EG EASEMENT M E ROW1.2554,450 E ' & 0 N. BLOCK 1 0 T6 TE N 'N & I 1,058,948 TOTAL24.31 E 6L E 1 7M0 U Y' .G TD E T 6IR AL S IA T 4R NI YN IA E 3A E E AG A P SE R Y OE & M D T R IE ' N L P 0 IT 2 LOT 1 T U VIERLING ACRES PLAT OF WEST DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE PRELIMINARY SHOWN THUS: ' 8 7 . T 1 5' N &0 ISSUED FOR REVIEW - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION E 5 E10'10' M G E 5' A S N IA E A U1R Y 5 T DT ' I I ' LD L 0 I RI T 2 A YT I ENU AA OUTLOT D SG EE M & E N T & T EBEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AT ADJOINING LOT LINES, N GE A M NEAND 10 FEET IN WIDTH AT ADJOIING STREET LINES AS I S A A R E SHOWN ON THE PLAT. D ' Y 0 T' 2I L 7 I T 7 . 9U 6' BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON ON ASSUMED 7 7 DATUM. 6 4 3 2 . 1 5 ' SHAKOPEE, MN BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AT ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH AT ADJOIING STREET LINES AS ' SHOWN ON THE PLAT. 8 5 . 4 HY-VEE 9 1 BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON ON ASSUMED DATUM. 1 5 DEVELOPER:OWNER: ' D U R T A I LI N I T AHY-VEE INC.CAL HAASKEN Y G EE A & S E M5820 WESTOWN PARKWAY413 CHESTNUT ST. E N T WEST DEMOINES IA 50266CHASKA, MN 55318 RANDY DOWNS ' 65(515)559-5703 NORTH 0 1 5 . 8 ' 61 1' CIVIL ENGINEER:LAND SURVEYOR: KIMLEY-HORN INC.EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC. 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE WEST1229 TYLER ST NE SUITE 328NSUITE 100 ST. PAUL MN 55114MINNEAPOLIS MN 55413 SHEET NUMBER DAN ELENBAASERIC ROESER PP-1.0 (763)251-1011(612)466-3300 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 2015 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM PHONE: 651-645-4197 S R HE T O Y B D E M R O F ER P E B O T Y A W F- O - HT G I R T O ND M OF E ID TS U O K R O W L L A CONSTRUCTION PLAN ISSUED FOR REVIEW - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CSAH 15 TURN LANE SHAKOPEE, MN LEGENDNOTES: 1CONCRETE B618 CURB AND1ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF GUTTERCURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 2CONCRETE APPROACH NOSE SEE NORTH MNDOT STD PLATE NO. 7113A 3MATCH EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER SHEET NUMBER C4.0 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 2015 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM PHONE: 651-645-4197 DRAINAGE PLAN GRADING AND ISSUED FOR REVIEW - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION RS E H T O Y B D E M R FO R E P E B O T Y A -W F O T- H IG R T O D N M F O E D SI T U O K R O W L L A GRADING NOTES 7. FINISH CONTOURS SHOWN ARE TO TOP OF PAVEMENT OR TO TOP OF 1. STRIP TOPSOIL (MIN.4") FROM ENTIRE SITE AND STOCKPILE IN AREA TOPSOIL. SEE BUILDING PLANS AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FOR DESIGNATED BY OWNER. TOPSOIL TO BE REUSED AS TOP DRESSINGS ON FINISHED SUBGRADE BELOW FINISHED FLOOR AND PAVEMENT SECTIONS. ALL UNSURFACED AREAS UPON COMPLETION OF THE ROUGH GRADING. TOP DRESSING SHALL BE A MINIMUM UNIFORM THICKNESS OF 4". LEGENDLEGEND 8. SCARIFY SUBGRADE TO DEPTH OF 3" WHERE TOPSOIL IS SCHEDULED. PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE SCARIFY IN AREAS WHERE EQUIPMENT USED FOR HAULING AND CSAH 15 TURN LANE 2. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WHERE SHOWN EXISTING CONTOUREXISTING CONTOUR SPREADING TOPSOIL HAS CAUSED COMPACTED SUBSOIL. ON PLANS. DEVICES TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL PAVEMENT AND INTAKES PROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOUR 925925 SHAKOPEE, MN ARE CONSTRUCTED AND UNTIL A LAWN IS ESTABLISHED. PROPOSED MANHOLEPROPOSED MANHOLE 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITIES PROPOSED CATCH BASINPROPOSED CATCH BASIN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE. 3. IN AREAS TO RECEIVE ADDITIONAL FILL OVER EXISTING FILL PROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED STORM SEWER MATERIALS, REMOVE TOP 12" OF MATERIAL AND SCARIFY AND PROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED STORM SEWER 10. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN AT TOP OF FINISH GRADE, ADD 6" TO RECOMPACT THE NEXT 9" OF RESULTING SUBGRADE. COMPACT TO 95% PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ELEVATIONS IN PAVED AREAS TO FIND TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS.100.00100.00 STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. SUBSEQUENT FILL TO BE COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY TO WITHIN 1.0' OF FINAL SUBGRADE. 11. BUILDING PAD SHALL BE GRADED TO A LEVEL OF SIX INCHES BELOW BENCHMARK THE FINAL 1.0' OF FILL TO BE COMPACTED TO 98% STANDARD PROCTOR. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TO AN ACCURACY OF PLUS OR MINUS 1/10 SITE BENCHMARK MN/DOT "OPEE" LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 600 FT OF A FOOT (UNLESS OTHERWISE RECOMMENDED BY GEOTECHNICAL 4. SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT THE TOP 9" OF SUBGRADE IN ALL CUT SOUTHWEST OF SITE ON WEST SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD 15. REPORT AND APPROVAL BY HY-VEE. AREAS AFTER ROUGH GRADING IS COMPLETED. COMPACT THE ENTIRE ELEV: 828.66 (DATUM: NAVD 88) NORTH PAVING AND BUILDING SUBGRADE TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY 12. ALL PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALK SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0% TO WITHIN 1.0' OF FINAL SUBGRADE. THE FINAL 1.0' OF FILL TO BE CROSS SLOPE AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 5.0% SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF COMPACTED TO 98% STANDARD PROCTOR. TRAVEL. 5. PROVIDE MINIMUM OF 1.0' OF COMPACTED NON-EXPANSIVE COHESIVE 13. HY-VEE DESIGN GRADES: GENERAL- SLOPES SHALL BE BETWEEN 1% SOIL BENEATH ALL PAVEMENTS. MIN - 3% MAX SLOPE IN PARKING LOTS UNLESS APPROVED BY HY-VEE FIRST 150' OR DISTANCE TO FARTHEST HANDICAP STALL SHALL BE 1% MIN 6. ALL FILL AND BACKFILL MATERIALS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE SOILS TO 2% MAX DRIVEWAY SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 5% MAX EXCEPT ENGINEER. PLACE ALL FILLS IN LIFTS OF NINE INCHES OR LESS LOOSE SHEET NUMBER UPON REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF HY-VEE THICKNESS. ALL FILL SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN 1% BELOW AND 4% C5.0 ABOVE OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. LEGEND PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT E T G N A E N I M A E R S DA E T OY T D I NL I MT ' U 0 0 D 1 N A ' 0 5 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PROPERTY SUMMARY RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 2015 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. TOTAL PROPERTY AREA24.31 ACRES 5 18 .35 D ' = ZONING SUMMARY 2 15E ' DRA 9 X. 33 INA' GAS GE & EAS 5EMEN 8.3T 5' 5" 9 UTI3.0 4 LITY1'6 EAS 3 EMEWWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM NT '' 28 3 6 L 0 EXISTING ZONINGR1B: URBAN RESIDENTIALPHONE: 651-645-4197 ", 1 =L = 1 D9 = 6 8 2 5. 6 2 .19 3.= 2L6 6 '8 ,0 . 21.84' R0 ' 0 = 5 5 91= 0 5 0 PROPOSED ZONINGB1: HIGHWAY BUSINESS 'R . 5D 0 U 0 . TR IA L 3I 'IN T YA 8 3GL E= 1E9 A 5 5 S&.9 . 2 E' SIDE/REAR = 5' M 7 E 'N 9PARKING SETBACKS T ' 21 65 TROAD = 15' 0N & . OUTLOT A E E 9 M G OUTLOT C FRONT = 30' 0 E22.19' A 4S N IA BUILDING SETBACKSSIDE = 20' AE 7 8 . 0R Y 7 ' REAR = 30' DT I '' LT 0I 5 TN 3 & .5 U .E 5 E 0 8M SIGN SETBACK10' G 0E A 2 S N IA ' E A 4 3 7R Y4 0 . 8. 4DT 'E I X'1 .' 6L 6 '0 I4 G6 A1 ST'4 E7 A .8 SU E M E66 N T. 9 LOT 2 7 2 PROPOSED AREAS T 7 N ' &2 E 9 E 9M .G E 0A SACRESSQ. FT. 7 N A I 1 E A R Y 503,120 DTLOT 111.55 I ' L 0 I 2 T U ' 130,245 3LOT 22.99 3 . 4 230.46' 6 1 0.8838,333 OUTLOT A 20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 47,481 OUTLOT B1.09 15.47' U T1116.80'60,549 OUTLOT C1.39 I5 L L ' = I D T 1 8 R Y 8 A.OUTLOT D5.16224,770 E2 3 I ANDRA INAGE & S A UTILITY EG EASEMENT M E ROW1.2554,450 E ' & 0 N. BLOCK 1 0 T6 TE N 'N & I 1,058,948 TOTAL24.31 E 6L E 1 7M0 U Y' .G TD E T 6IR AL S IA T 4R NI YN IA E 3A E E AG A P SE R Y OE & M D T R IE ' N L P 0 IT 2 LOT 1 T U VIERLING ACRES PLAT OF WEST DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE PRELIMINARY SHOWN THUS: ' 8 7 . T 1 5' N &0 ISSUED FOR REVIEW - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION E 5 E10'10' M G E 5' A S N IA E A U1R Y 5 T DT ' I I ' LD L 0 I RI T 2 A YT I ENU AA OUTLOT D SG EE M & E N T & T EBEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AT ADJOINING LOT LINES, N GE A M NEAND 10 FEET IN WIDTH AT ADJOIING STREET LINES AS I S A A R E SHOWN ON THE PLAT. D ' Y 0 T' 2I L 7 I T 7 . 9U 6' BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON ON ASSUMED 7 7 DATUM. 6 4 3 2 . 1 5 ' SHAKOPEE, MN BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AT ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH AT ADJOIING STREET LINES AS ' SHOWN ON THE PLAT. 8 5 . 4 HY-VEE 9 1 BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON ON ASSUMED DATUM. 1 5 DEVELOPER:OWNER: ' D U R T A I LI N I T AHY-VEE INC.CAL HAASKEN Y G EE A & S E M5820 WESTOWN PARKWAY413 CHESTNUT ST. E N T WEST DEMOINES IA 50266CHASKA, MN 55318 RANDY DOWNS ' 65(515)559-5703 NORTH 0 1 5 . 8 ' 61 1' CIVIL ENGINEER:LAND SURVEYOR: KIMLEY-HORN INC.EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC. 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE WEST1229 TYLER ST NE SUITE 328NSUITE 100 ST. PAUL MN 55114MINNEAPOLIS MN 55413 SHEET NUMBER DAN ELENBAASERIC ROESER PP-1.0 (763)251-1011(612)466-3300 MATCH LINE, SEE BOTTOM LEFT LEGEND 15' PAVEMENT PROPERTY LINE SETBACK ' 0 . 5SETBACK LINE 6 R R 6 5 . 0 'PROPOSED FENCE CITY OF PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER SHAKOPEE MONUMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY M PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT SIGN I ' 0 . 5 2 R 5' PAVEMENT SETBACK REPLACE BIKE R PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT 2 5 BOX CULVERTCROSSING SIGN . 0 ' ' 0 . MONUMENT SIGN 5 20' YARD SETBACK PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA "DO NOT M ENTER" SIGN PROPOSED NORMAL WATER LINE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PROPOSED HIGH WATER LINE ' 0 . TRANSPORTATION 5 R 1 5 R '2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 C RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 R 0 .. 50 A 0 0 ' 1. PROTECT EXISTING STRUCTURES AND ADJACENT PROPERTY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 4 . R 0 B PROPERTY SUMMARY 1 0'' 5. 15 D . 0 2. PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. ' 'A 0 .A 3 5 2 0 RETAIL DEVELOPMENT R WASH 3 CAR. 00 2016 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. .3. THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES INDICATED ON THE PLANS ARE TAKEN FROM EXISTING 0' ' 5' DRAINAGE AND ' RECORDS. THE EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF ALL UTILITIES MUST BE DETERMINED BY 0 . 5 = 802.50 FFE 3 B UTILITY EASEMENT THE CONTRACTOR. IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ASCERTAIN WHETHER TOTAL PROPERTY AREA15.95 ACRES R ANY ADDITIONAL UTILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLAN MAY BE PRESENT. ZONING SUMMARY WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM ' 0 4. ALL DIMENSIONS TO FACE-OF-CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE .G OUTLOT C 3PHONE: 651-645-4197 R 0' 0.A FIELD VERIFIED. 3 EXISTING ZONINGR1B: URBAN RESIDENTIAL I 5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY BUILDING DIMENSIONS WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. F HARVEST LANE ROW 3 0 1 . 15' PAVEMENT SETBACK 06. ALL SLOPES IN PAVEMENT SHALL BE UNIFORM TO AVOID PONDING. 66' PIPELINE 8' PROPOSED ZONINGB1: HIGHWAY BUSINESS ' "DO NOT . 0 0 R FUTURE R. ' 9.0'43 FACILITIES 5 ENTER" SIGN 157. UNLESS DETAILED OR NOTED OTHERWISE, PROVIDE 1" PRE-MOLDED EXPANSION JOINT 0 . . 0 08.3' 'EASEMENT C OMMERCIA ESIDE/REAR = 5' R'D L MATERIAL WHERE CONCRETE IS POURED AGAINST BUILDING. PROVIDE 1" EXPANSION ' 0 A .'A N 3PARKING SETBACKS I 0 50MATERIAL WHERE CONCRETE IS POURED AGAINST EXISTING CONCRETE. SET PRE-MOLDED .LROAD = 15' 1 . 0 C 0 R ' 'YMATERIAL TIGHT AGAINST BUILDING AND/OR CONCRETE TO ELIMINATE VOIDS. 30 . 5 3T 30' YARD SETBACK R ' FRONT = 30' R 0 A . 29.5'RE G 5 8. FINISH GRADES SHOWN ARE TO TOP OF PAVING, SIDEWALKS, OR FINISH GRADE. 1 PBUILDING SETBACKSSIDE = 20' 5 . O 0 ' RREAR = 30' 11.3'R P 9. STAGING LOCATION FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TO BE '1 .09 8. 36.3'00 ' A 41.4'I LOT 2'.COORDINATED WITH AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER. 0 0 'OUTLOT A .0. ' 80 F 3 SIGN SETBACK10' R A 45.0' A SITE PLAN NOTES 50.0' H 9 TRAIL' .1. SIDEWALKS: INSTALL WHERE INDICATED ON PLANS. ALL NEW SIDEWALK SLABS SHALL BE A 0 0 STORE 18.0' C-. ' '0 F 0MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES THICK. CONCRETE TO HAVE A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4000 PSI 3 B. 0 ' ,375 SF AT 28 DAYS WITH 5 PERCENT AIR ENTRAINMENT AND LIMESTONE AGGREGATE-3/4" MAXIMUM 4 2 0 BUILDING DATA SUMMARY E A. N3 SIZE. MAXIMUM SUBSTITUTION OF FLY ASH IS 15%. FLY ASH SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C618 I 3 ' L .80 FE = 800 F 0 F CLASS C. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS AT 6'-0" O/C MAXIMUM UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. . F Y 8 T B 1 AREAS F R ' Q 14.0'2. ROADS, PARKING SURFACES, AND CURBS: INSTALL WHERE INDICATED ON PLANS. EJ 7.0''0 B. P0 .3 CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4000 PSI AT 28 DAYS WITH 5 O3 2 RR 5 PERCENT AIR ENTRAINMENT AND LIMESTONE AGGREGATE 1-1/2 INCH MAXIMUM SIZE. 95,800 SF HY-VEE P 28.0' R 3 3.0'MAXIMUM SUBSTITUTION OF FLY ASH IS 15%. FLY ASH SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C618 36.0' 20.0'2 0 . 0 GD CLASS C. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS AT 12'-0" O/C (N & S) MAXIMUM UNLESS NOTED '18.0' F OTHERWISE. OPEN SALES LOT 4,341 SF C-STORE A 3 0.0' D I I 3. PERFORM CONCRETE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 AND ACI 318. CONFORM TO ACI D 5.0'PROPOSED PARKING 305 DURING HOT WEATHER AND ACI 306.1 DURING COLD WEATHER. J 30.0' JJ 30.0' R 2 4. CONCRETE FINISH: MEDIUM BROOM 5 . 517 SPACES @ 5.39/1,000 SF 0HY-VEE ' 5. BACKER ROD: DO NOT USE BACKER ROD 7 G G R .J ' 57 0 E .3.' ''' 0 A 50' .00 A 22 SPACES @ 5.06/1000 SF 0 AA 6. CURING AGENT: RESIN BASED, MEMBRANE FORMING COMPOUND COMPLYING WITH ASTMC-STORE 32'. .A 0 0 IB R. R. 41 0 A 0 RC309, TYPE 1 '6 F 3 E VE V 9.0' D 27.0'7. SIDEWALK JOINT SEALANT: SELF-LEVELING POLYURETHANE GUN GRADE SEALANT. COLOR: 'O R 0 1 . 'GRAY. 5 R5 . 02 20 . 5 ' 5.R 0 ' 1 Q 8. ROADS, PARKING, AND CURB JOINT SEALANT: HOT POURED JOINT SEALANT COMPOSED OF PROPOSED AREAS ELECTRIC CAR J ' PETROPOLYMERS MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM D 3405. FILL JOINTS FULL. JJ 10.4'0 C.CHARGER T FUTURE ROAD 6 F' 50 . 9. CONCRETE TESTING: CORE COMPRESSIVE AND DEPTH TESTING AT 10 RANDOM LOCATIONS BY OTHERS 5LOT 111.55 ACRES WIND TURBINE H 2 CHOSEN BY OWNER REPRESENTATIVE AT COMPLETION OF EXTERIOR CONCRETE WORK. N TESTING SHALL BE DONE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ACI 318 AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM ' .0 0 3 J EC24/C42M. LOT 22.99 ACRES 15.0' N I L H A ' A 10. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BOLLARD LOCATIONS. BOLLARD LOCATIONS MUST BE A Y 0 E . T 2COORDINATED WITH AND APPROVED BY THE HY-VEE SITE WORK REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO OUTLOT A0.88 ACRES R T 2 Q E BEGINNING WORK. DERO BIKE P O RACKS R 11. SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS AND SOILS REPORT FOR ANY SPECIAL EXCAVATION AND FILL POUTLOT B1.09 ACRES REQUIREMENTS. R N JJ A 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A JOINTING PLAN FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO FORMING OUTLOT C1.39 ACRES SITE PLAN B H JPAVEMENTS. LOT 1 ' 0 . SIGNAGE AND STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS: 3OUTLOT D5.16 ACRES 27.0' ISSUED FOR REVIEW - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION R FUTURE 33.5'HY-VEE 1.PAINT TRAFFIC DIRECTION ARROWS, PARKING STRIPES, AND HANDICAP SYMBOLS TRAIL "TRAFFIC YELLOW". 95,800 SF HARVEST LANE ROW1.25 ACRES J J C A A 2. PAINT SHALL BE LEAD FREE WATERBORNE TRAFFIC AND HIGHWAY MARKING PAINT FFE = 801.50 J UC-3584 YELLOW AS MANUFACTURED BY DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS OR EQUIVALENT. 36.5' N TOTAL24.31 ACRES 8.0' 3. PROVIDE FOUNDRY GRADE SILICA SAND THAT MEETS A 50/60 GRADED SAND WHEN H 13.2' TESTED ACCORDING TO ASTM C-136. MNDOT SPECIFIED REFLECTIVE GLASS BEADS ARE AN 28.1' ACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTE TO SAND 64.6' J N JJ PARKING REQUIREMENTS 'E 4. BEFORE APPLICATION OF PAINT, PAINTING SURFACE MUST BE DRY AND FREE FROM DIRT, 0 .A 3 A 0 1 RGREASE, OIL, OR OTHER MATERIAL THAT WOULD REDUCE THE BOND BETWEEN THE 1/??? SF. PAVEMENT AND PAINT. CLEAN THE AREA TO BE PAINTED BY SWEEPING OR COMPRESSED REQUIRED SPACES:??? AIR. R 1PROVIDED SPACES:??? 5 0. 0' ZONING AND LAND USE MNDOT J 5. APPLY PAINT AT LOCATIONS, DIMENSIONS, AND SPACING SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ACCESS ZONING: GB (GENERAL BUSINESS) Q JJ ' OPEN SALES LOT 6 A PROPOSED USE: GROCERY STORE . CONTROL 6. MIX PAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND APPLY AT THE ' 9 01 BUILDING SETBACKS . 12.9'RATE OF 115 SF/GALLON. THE ADDITION OF THINNER WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 5 ' 0 WATER R .EXTERIOR - 25' FROM ADJACENT STREETS 0 17. APPLY SILICA SAND AT 4LBS/GALLON OF PAINT IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE APPLICATION OF INTERIOR - NONE SPIGOT 20.0' B PAINT. SILICA SAND SHALL ADHERE TO THE CURED PAINT PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE AND MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT - 60' PAYMENT. J 10.0' 75' YARD SETBACK R J1 5 0 H .0 ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHAKOPEE, MN 8. PROTECT ALL MARKINGS FROM DAMAGE UNTIL PAINT IS DRY. 20.0' WIND TURBINE AA N R N 12.5' 4 K 5' PAVEMENT . 9. ALL TRAFFIC SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 0 A LOT 1 OF BLUE SPRINGS HY-VEE - FIRST PLAT LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST H ' SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD). SETBACK QUARTER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 49 NORTH, RANGE 30 WEST JACKSON HY-VEE COUNTY, MISSOURI. ' R 10. PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN JACKSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, SHAKOPEE 0 . R 3 'TO 5JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND SHAKOPEE HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT. 53 VF . EV 0 0 E R 1. J0 R 30.0' ' R' '4KEYNOTE LEGEND .0 5 L 0' . . ' 020 . 58 1 R 1 PROPOSED B612 CURB AND GUTTER STOP SIGN R STANDARD DUTY PAVEMENT ADA ACCESSIBLE SIGN AND POST, DETAIL 12-A ON C3.1 A R FLAG POLE HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT C 5 0 R CHARGING SIGN AND POST, DETAIL 12-B ON C3.1 . 0 F 2' M 9.0' PROPOSED SIDEWALK I N. N 0 E S'RESERVED(EXPECTING) SIGN AND POST, DETAIL 12-A ON C3.1 ' O TT R P A 0 A R D. N O NORTH E S P P P 8 A E O R R R 1 T T INTEGRAL SIDEWALK T M Y A E T L N I I OT N N E O RF I G CROSSWALK STRIPING PER STRIPING NOTES BOLLARDS H30' YARD SETBACK T - O F -W A ADA STALL/STRIPING Y TRANSFORMER 15' PAVEMENT I 'CURB ISLAND NON-TYPICAL 0 SETBACK . 5 J 1 CART CORRAL K MATCH LINE, SEE UPPER RIGHT SHEET NUMBER LIGHT POLE C3.0 LEGEND PROPOSED REDUCER PROPOSED TEE PROPOSED GATE VALVE NORTH PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC STRM 13 SEE PROPOSED TELEPHONE SHEETC5.4 PROPOSED GAS MAIN PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT STR -195 STR -196 UTILITY NOTES STRM 01 SEE SHEETC5.2 1. PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN. THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES INDICATED ON THE PLANS ARE 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TAKEN FROM EXISTING RECORDS. THE EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF ALL UTILITIES MUST BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR. IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ASCERTAIN WHETHER ANY ADDITIONAL FACILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLAN MAY BE PRESENT. 8"X6" TEE PROPOSED 2. SITEWORK UTILITY CONTRACTOR TO EXTEND ALL PIPING TO WITHIN 5' OF BUILDING AND CAP FOR CONNECTION BY BUILDING FIRE HYDRANT 2016 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. UTILITY CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE ALL INVERT ELEVATIONS AND PIPING LOCATIONS WITH BUILDING PLANS. STRM 12 SEE SHEETC5.4 3. SEE DETAILS FOR UTILITY TRENCH CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO OBSERVE UTILITY 1+00CONNECT TO (1) 1" ELECTRICAL TRENCH BACKFILL AND COMPACTION PROCEDURES. EXISTING WATERMAIN CONDUIT TO SIGN 8" CL52 DIP WM 0 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM 0 + 6"GATE4. BUILDING PLUMBING CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE ON WATER LINES ACCORDING TO WATER 0PHONE: 651-645-4197 2 + 0 0 VALVE COMPANY REQUIREMENTS. SEE PLUMBING PLANS. 6" GATE 24 LF- 6" VALVE ASH CAR W CL52 DIP5. WATER PIPING SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON - AWWA C151. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE DISINFECTED PER MN RULE 4715.2250 AND PROPOSED UTILITY 802.50 TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULE 4715.2820. FFE = 4"GATE FOR FUTURE STRM 02 SEE 4-INCH CL52 DIPVALVE DEVELOPMENT SHEETC5.26. ALL WATER PIPING SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7'-6" COVER. WATER SERVICE CONNECT TO EXISTING NATURAL GAS SERVICESTRM 04 SEE0 BEND OUTLOT C 0 7. INSTALL VINYL IDENTIFICATION TAPE AT 2'-0" BELOW FINISH GRADE DIRECTLY ABOVE WATER LINES. + SHEETC5.2 STRM 11 SEE0 0 0 + SHEETC5.48"X4" TEE HARVEST LANE ROW 3 8. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL TRANSFORMER PAD AND SECONDARY WIRING. UTILITY COMPANY TO INSTALL PRIMARY WIRING. CONNECT TO EXISTING PROPOSED UTILITY SANITARY STUB 9. CONTACT APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENT AGENCY PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY WATER MAIN WORK. PROPOSED FOR FUTUREIE (PROPOSED): 788.05 FUTUR E FIRE HYDRANT DEVELOPMENT 10. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: CONNECT TO GATE VALVE1+00 7 6" CL52 DIP WM 4+00 COMMERCI E 9 AL 8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D 3034 FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP 7EXISTING WATERMAIN N E .I 7 O8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D 3034 FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP 18" GATEL PROPOSED FIRE F Y VALVE6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D 3034 HYDRANT T R ALL SEWER PIPE INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321 E 6" GATE P 9.5 LF- 6" O VALVE8"X6" TEE 9. ALL EXISTING VALVES MUST BE OPERATED BY SPU PERSONNEL ONLY. NOTIFY SPU AT LEAST 48 HRS IN ADVANCE TO R CL52 DIP P SAN 02 SEE NEEDING VALVES OPERATING. 6"X6" TEEPOLY WRAP WATER MAIN LOT 2 SHEETC5.1 OUTLOT A OUTLOT B WITHIN EASEMENT AND 25' 10. ALL PUBLIC WATER MAIN (NOT INCLUDING INDIVIDUAL SERVICE LINES) MUST BE INSPECTED BY SPU PERSONNEL INCLUDING BEYOND EASEMENT THE INSTALLATION AND TESTING. NOTIFY SPU AT LEAST 48 HRS IN ADVANCE TO ANY INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC WATER MAIN. ORE C-ST 11. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN CROSSING MUST HAVE 18 INCHES OF SEPARATION OR MORE. STORM SEWER AND (1) 1" ELECTRICAL5+00 5 SF WATER MAIN CROSSING MUST HAVE 3FT OF SEPARATION OR MORE. WATER MAIN MUST BE LOCATED AT LEAST 10FT 4,37 E CONDUIT TO SIGN8" CL52 DIP WM NHORIZONTALLY TO ANY SEWER STRUCTURE OR PIPE. I L = 800.80 FFE Y T STRM 06 SEE12. HYDRANTS MUST BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 7.5FT BEHIND CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY SPU UTILITIES R CLEAN8" CL52 DIP WM ESHEETC5.3 MANAGER. 0 POUT 0 + O 2 R 13. ALL WATER MAIN MUST BE INSTALLED PER THE LATEST VERSION OF THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION WATER P POLICY MANUAL. STRM 07 SEE 8" CL52 DIP WM SHEETC5.3 SITE LIGHTING NOTES 3+00 PROPOSED 8"X6" TEE 1. NOTIFICATION: CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY HY-VEE A MINIMUM OF 60 DAYS PRIOR TO THE ANTICIPATED DATE OF 799.0 INSTALLATION. 21+00 PROPOSED 22+1232+00 20+00 8"X8" TEE 1 92. MATERIAL: OWNER WILL PURCHASE SITE LIGHTING MATERIALS. THOSE MATERIALS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: FIXTURES 0+ 080PROPOSED (2) 2" DATA 0 0WITH LAMPS, TENON, POLE, ANCHOR BOLTS AND ANCHOR BOLT TEMPLATE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE PROPOSED +0 . STRM 09 SEEE0 68"X8" TEE CONDUIT TO O 8"X8" TEEFOR RECEIVING, UNLOADING, AND VERIFYING QUANTITIES AND CONDITIONS OF THESE MATERIALS. INSPECT ALL PACKAGES 59 LF- 6" CL52 DIP F SHEETC5.3 F C-STORE 8" GATEFOR EXTERIOR DAMAGE BEFORE THE CARRIER LEAVES THE SITE, AND NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE WITH O ESAN 01 SEE VALVE6" GATEINFORMATION ON THE SHIPMENT. RETURN A COPY OF THE PACKING LIST TO HY-VEE WITHIN SEVEN DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF 0+001+00 22++0001 SHEETC5.1 VALVE 8" GATETHE MATERIALS WITH NOTES REGARDING ANY DAMAGED GOODS OR THE LACK OF DAMAGE. PROPOSED FIREVALVE HYDRANT 3. STORAGE OF MATERIALS: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR STORAGE AND PROTECTION OF ALL SITE CLEANLIGHTING MATERIALS, AND FOR INSTALLATION OF A FUNCTIONING SYSTEM WHICH MEETS HY-VEE'S APPROVAL. 8" CL52 DIP WM OUT PROPOSED NATURAL GAS SERVICE GREASE 4. CONDUIT AND WIRE: CONDUIT AND WIRE FOR SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE SIZED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND 4 INTERCEPTOR + 0 0APPROVED BY HY-VEE. 6-INCH SANITARY SERVICE 00 PROPOSED + 0 8 8"X6" TEE 0 1E +5. TESTING: A MINIMUM OF 30 DAYS BEFORE THE STORE'S GRAND OPENING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT A 100 HOUR UTILITY PLAN N 76-INCH SANITARY SERVICE I 2-INCH RIGID COPPER IRRIGATION L CONSECUTIVE TEST OF THE SITE LIGHTING SYSTEM. THIS IS INTENDED TO EXPOSE BURNED OUT LAMPS OR OTHER SUPPLY LINE FROM BUILDING TO 4-FEET Y PROBLEMS WHILE ELECTRICIANS AND EQUIPMENT ARE STILL ON SITE. HY-VEE SHALL BE NOTIFIED WITH THE RESULTS OF T BEYOND CURB WITH CAP AND LOCATION R 5+ 00 BENDTHIS TEST AS SOON AS POSSIBLE SO REPLACEMENT MATERIALS CAN BE OBTAINED IF NECESSARY. E5 +3 9 STAKE (COORDINATE DEPTH WITH SAN 02 SEEP ISSUED FOR REVIEW - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION O IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR) AND 2-INCH6" GATE SHEETC5.1 R6. WIRING INFORMATION: SEE SHEET E-1 FOR CIRCUIT AND PANEL ASSIGNMENTS. A WIRING DIAGRAM FOR THE PARKING LOT CONDUIT FOR IRRIGATION WIRINGVALVE P LIGHTS IS REQUIRED FOR FUTURE REFERENCE. MAKE EDITS ON SITE UTILITY PLAN AND RETURN TO OWNER WITH AS-BUILT PROPOSED FIRE NOTES. PROPOSED UTILITY DEPARTMENT CONNECT TO EXISTING 6" GATE VALVE CONNECTIONFOR FUTURE WATERMAIN 7. REFER TO FIXTURE AND POLE BASE DETAIL. LOT 1 DEVELOPMENT 0 PROPOSED FIREPROPOSED 4-INCH CL52 0 + HYDRANTDIP DOMESTIC SERVICE 0 7 0 1 + 8"X6" TEE HY-VEE 8 PROPOSED 8-INCH 22 LF- 6" CL52 DIP 95,800 SF CL52 DIP FIRE SERVICE 25 LF- 6" CL52 DIP FFE = 801.50 8"X4" TEE PROPOSED FIRE 8"X8" TEE HYDRANT 8"X6" TEE 6" GATE VALVE 10' MIN. 0 SEPARATION 0 STRM 08 SEE + 0 6 SHEETC5.30 1 (2) 2" DATA +8" CL52 DIP WM 9 CONDUIT TO C-STORE OUTLOT D 4-INCH SANITARY SHAKOPEE, MN FUTURE SERVICE 8" CL52 DIP WM SANITARY SCHEDULE MULTIFAMILY PROPOSED FIBER OPTIC SERVICE HY-VEE RESIDENTIAL INVERTPIPEPIPEINVERTPIPEPIPE PIPE OUT STRUCTURESTRUCTURE/RIM/GRATE PROPOSEDELEVATIONSIZESLOPE ELEVATIONSIZESLOPEPIPE MATERIAL (PUBLIC/PRIVATE) NO.CASTING TYPEELEVATION TELEPHONE0 INININOUTOUTOUT 0 SERVICE+ 0 05 1 + STR -172MH798.21W 791.096"1.00% 0 1 STR -177MH800.31SE 792.516"0.40%PVC 10' MIN. SEPARATION STR -178MH799.36NW 791.966"0.40%E 791.866"0.39%PVC W 790.276"0.39% STR -179MH799.39N 790.178"0.40%PVC S 790.276"0.40% PROPOSED FIRE 8"X6" TEE 0 HYDRANT 0 + S 789.358"0.40% 4 1STR -180MH800.35E 789.258"0.40%PVC 6" GATE VALVE W 789.356"0.40% 1 1 12+00 + 0STR -181MH800.03W 788.388"0.40%N 788.288"0.40%PVC 8" GATE CONNECT TO0 13+00 VALVE EXISTING TELEPHONE STR -184MH799.47W 790.176"1.21%E 790.076"0.40%PVC SERVICE 23 LF- 6" CL52 DIP STR -186MH801.22W 791.794"1.00%N 791.696"0.40%PVC PSTRM 10 SEE R8"X6" TEE O P E SHEETC5.4 R T SHEET NUMBER Y L I N C5.0 E 40 LF- 6" CL52 DIP PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT 6" GATE VALVE PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE QTY SYMBOLCOMMON NAMESIZEROOT SWAMP WHITE OAK2.5" CAL.B & B COMMON HACKBERRYB & B 2.5" CAL. NORTHERN ACCLAIM HONEYLOCUST2.5" CAL.B & B SIENNA GLEN MAPLEB & B 2.5" CAL. PATRIOT ELM2.5" CAL.B & B KENTUCKY COFFEETREEB & B 2.5" CAL. 119 BLUE BEECH2.5" CAL.B & B SHADE TREE RIVER BIRCHB & B 2.5" CAL. BOULEVARD LINDEN2.5" CAL.B & B NORTHERN PIN OAKB & B 2.5" CAL. 1+0 0 REDMOND LINDEN2.5" CAL.B & B 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 SIGN 0 ACCOLADE ELMB & B 2.5" CAL. 0 + 0 2 + 0 0 PRAIRIEFIRE CRABAPPLE1.25" CAL.B & B ASH CAR W 2016 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 0+00 IVORY SILK LILAC1.25" CAL.B & B 16 802.50 FFE = ORNAMENTAL AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERY1.25" CAL.B & B DECIDUOUS WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM OUTLOT C PHONE: 651-645-4197 5' HTB & B BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 0 39 EVERGREEN 0 + HARVEST LANE ROW 3 5' HTB & B WHITE SPRUCE VIBURNUM#5CONT. FUTUR E FORSYTHIA#5CONT. 4+00 COMMERCI E AL N I L #5CONT. DOGWOOD Y T 750 R ROSE#3CONT. E P 0 O 0 R + #3CONT. SPIREA P1 LOT 2 OUTLOT A OUTLOT B JUNIPER#2CONT. SHRUB/ PERENNIAL #1CONT. BLACK EYED SUSAN BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 4" ORE C-ST MINIMUM HARDWOOD 2+00 5+00 DAYLILY#1CONT. 5 SF 4,37 E MULCH N 1,275 I L 800.80 FFE =#1CONT. KARL FOERSTER Y T R E #1CONT. CATMINT P O R P 53,385 NATIVE WET SEED MIX SQ. FT. -SOD 22+123 2+0021+00 20+00 1 90 0+ 0 00 + 0 + 3 6 0+001+00 22++0001 CODE DESCRIPTIONREQUIREDPROPOSED 3 UNITS OF LANDSCAPING10,000 SF/1,000 SF =16 TREES @ 1.25" CALIPER = 16 UNITS REQUIRED FOR EVERY 1,000 SF OF10 X 3 = 30 UNITS BUILDING UP TO 10,000 SF39 EVERGREENS @ 5' HT = 39 UNITS 4 + 0 0 00 + 0 8 4 UNITS OF LANDSCAPING40,000 SF/1,000 SF =114 TREES @ 2.5" CALIPER = 228 UNITS 0 1E + N 7 I 40 X 4 = 1600 UNITS REQUIRED FOR EVERY 1,000 SF OF L Y BUILDING FROM 10,000 - 50,000SF160 #5 CONT. SHRUBS = 160 UNITS T R 5+ 00 E5 +3 9 P O 5 UNITS OF LANDSCAPING50,000 SF/1,000 SF =TOTAL = 443 UNITS R P REQUIRED FOR EVERY 1,000 SF OF50 X 5 = 250 UNITS LANDSCAPE PLAN BUILDING FROM 50,000 - 100,000 SF LOT 1 0 0 6 UNITS OF LANDSCAPING1,000 SF/1,000 SF = + 0 7 0 ISSUED FOR REVIEW - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 + REQUIRED FOR EVERY 1,000 SF OF1 X 6 = 6 UNITS HY-VEE 8 BUILDING ABOVE 100,000 SF 95,800 SF FFE = 801.50 HY-VEE =95,800 SF=101,000 SF C-STORE = 4,341 SF TOTAL = 446 UNITS TOTAL = 100,141 SF NOTE: CODE REQUIRES THAT NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPE UNITS BE 0 0 FULFILLED BY SHRUB UNITS. + 0 6 0 1 + 9 OUTLOT D CODE DESCRIPTIONREQUIREDPROPOSED FUTURE 1 SHADE TREE PER477,853 SF IMPERVIOUS AREA119 TREES REQUIRED MULTIFAMILY 4,000 SF PAVED AREA477,853 SF/4,000 = 119 TREES119 TREES PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL 0 0 + 0 05 SHAKOPEE, MN 1 + 0 1 HY-VEE 0 0 + 4 1 1 1 + 0 01 2+0013+00 P R NORTH O P E R T Y L I N E P R O P E R T Y L SHEET NUMBER I N E L1.0 City of Shakopee aĻƒƚƩğƓķǒƒ TO: Kyle Sobota, Senior Planner FROM: Joe Swentek, Project Engineer SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit, Preliminary and Final Plat, Planned Unit Development West Vierling Acres 1 st Addition CASE #: 16033 SUBLEDGER #: 116033 DATE: July 27, 2016 The staff review indicates a request to review a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), a Preliminary and Final Plat and a Planned Unit Development (PUD) application for West Vierling Acres 1 st Addition, a highway business (B-1) and Multiple Family Residential (R-3) subdivision located southeast of the intersection between Vierling Drive and Adams Street. This review should be considered preliminary, as more comments will follow with additional submittals. However, the public works department offers the following comments at this time to the applicant and to the planning department: Engineering: ŷĻ ŅƚƌƌƚǞźƓŭ źƷĻƒƭ ƓĻĻķ Ʒƚ ĬĻ ğķķƩĻƭƭĻķΉĭƚƒƦƌĻƷĻķ ƦƩźƚƩ Ʒƚ ƩĻƌĻğƭĻ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ CźƓğƌ tƌğƷ ŅƚƩ ƩĻĭƚƩķźƓŭʹ 1.Execution of a dagreement, which will include provisions for security for public improvements within the subdivision and payment of the Street and Utility Fee and the Watermain Fee. 2.Payment of all Storm Water Management Plan Review Fees need to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 3.Payment of the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge and the Valley Industrial Park and Valley Industrial Park II connection charges need to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. C:\\Users\\ksobota\\AppData\\Local\\Microsoft\\Windows\\Temporary Internet Files\\Content.Outlook\\KPTSSHW8\\PP_FP_CUP_PUD West Vierling Acres (Hy Vee) 072716.docx 1 of 4 4.Payment of the applicable Trunk Storm Water Charge needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 5.Payment of the Sign Installation Fee needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 6.Payment of the Bituminous Sealcoat Fee needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 7.The applicant will submit a detailed all public improvements associated with this subdivision. 8.The applicant will submit a detailed lot area drawing showing the total plat area, the total drainage and utility easement area encompassing high water levels of publicly maintained storm water basins, the total area of right-of-way, the total area of conservation easements and outlots, the total area of public bituminous street and the total area of each lot. 9.The applicant will need, at a minimum, conditional approval of the storm water management plan. 10.The applicant will submit a detailed geotechnical report outlining any groundwater encountered as well as infiltration rates in appropriate locations. 11.The applicant will agree to move the westernmost Vierling Drive access 50-feet to the east. 12.Provide additional right-of-way along Vierling Drive to a line offset one foot in a southerly direction from the southernmost edge of the existing bituminous trail. Provide additional right-of-way, in the form sight triangles 15-feet in dimension, at the intersection between Vierling Drive and Harvest Lane. 13.Easements will be shown on the final plat as approved by the city engineer. They include, but are not be limited to, the following: Minimum drainage and utility easements for public sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems need to be dedicated per Section 10.1 (A-D) of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria. Easements for public utilities need to be centered on the alignments. Provide a minimum of 15-feet of drainage and utility easement adjacent to the US- 169, Adams Street and Vierling Drive rights-of-way. Provide a minimum of ten feet of drainage and utility easement adjacent to the Harvest Lane right-of-way. C:\\Users\\ksobota\\AppData\\Local\\Microsoft\\Windows\\Temporary Internet Files\\Content.Outlook\\KPTSSHW8\\PP_FP_CUP_PUD West Vierling Acres (Hy Vee) 072716.docx 2 of 4 14.Provide electronic files (AutoCAD and Portable Document Format PDF) of the final plat to be recorded with datum on the Scott County coordinate system. ŷĻ ŅƚƌƌƚǞźƓŭ źƷĻƒƭ ƓĻĻķ Ʒƚ ĬĻ ğķķƩĻƭƭĻķΉĭƚƒƦƌĻƷĻķ ƦƩźƚƩ Ʒƚ ğƦƦƩƚǝğƌ ƚŅ ğ ŭƩğķźƓŭ ƦĻƩƒźƷͲ ğ ƭƷƩĻĻƷ ğƓķ ǒƷźƌźƷǤ ƦƌğƓ ğƓķΉƚƩ ğ ĬǒźƌķźƓŭ ƦĻƩƒźƷʹ 1.Payment of the applicable Trunk Storm Water Charge needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 2. 3.The applicant will obtain a NPDES construction site permit prior to any land disturbing activity. PDFs of the coverage card and letter will be provided to the city. 4.The applicant will submit a detailed impervious surface coverage drawing with each building permit adding impervious surface. 5.The applicant will remove the Adams Street access to the property. 6.The applicant will grade the entire site, as proposed on the approved plans, in one phase within one year from the date of approval of the grading permit application. Grading is defined as bringing the site to the proposed finished grade with materials deemed acceptable by the public works department, providing topsoil per city requirements and applying seed, mulch and/or sod per city requirements and providing an as-built record grading plan per Section 2.5 of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria. 7.The applicant will line all storm water basins with a minimum of two feet of clay from the bottom to the normal water level. However, the city engineer can allow this requirement to be reduced to one foot if the material meets certain specifications. 8.The applicant will revise the designs of all applicable storm water basins to remove the side slopes from within rights-of-way and required drainage and utility easements adjacent to Adams Street, Vierling Drive and Harvest Lane. 9.The applicant will place class IV fieldstone riprap and geotextile fabric at each flared end section in the city maintained storm water basin. The riprap and fabric will be installed to the bottom of the storm water basin. 10.The applicant will seed the city maintained storm water basin area with a native wetland vegetation. The seed mixture, application and maintenance requirements will be determined by the city engineer or their assign. 11.The applicant will submit detailed pavement design calculations for the Harvest Lane extension. C:\\Users\\ksobota\\AppData\\Local\\Microsoft\\Windows\\Temporary Internet Files\\Content.Outlook\\KPTSSHW8\\PP_FP_CUP_PUD West Vierling Acres (Hy Vee) 072716.docx 3 of 4 12.Sanitary sewer and storm sewer will be extended as necessary to accommodate future development of all outlots. 13.The applicant will install a bituminous trail or sidewalk along Adams Street from the US- 169 ramp to Vierling Drive. The design will need to be approved by the city engineer. 14.No landscaping will be allowed in drainage and utility easements, unless a detailed plan is submitted clearly showing how all lots will be served by private utilities. All applicable private utility companies will need to review and approve this plan prior to its submittal to the city. 15.The public works department believes Harvest Lane should be constructed as part of this subdivision. 16.The applicant will submit construction plans for all public improvements, including the Harvest Lane extension, the bituminous trail extension, the public sanitary sewer extension and the public storm sewer extension. These plans will be in compliance with requirements set forth in Section 11 of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria. 17.As part of the Harvest Lane extension, the applicant will remove the temporary cul-de- sac east of their site. 18.Prior to work in the MNDoT right-of-way, a permit will be required. Please contact MNDoT for details. 19.The city and the county are in the process of transferring ownership/jurisdiction of the Adams Street right-of-way to the city. However, if this process is delayed, the applicant will need to obtain a permit from Scott County prior to construction. Please contact Scott County for details. 20.Prior to work in the Adams Street and Vierling Drive rights-of-way, a right-of-way permit will be required. Please contact the senior public works technician for details. 21.Record plans need to be provided per the City of Shakopee Design Criteria, Section 2.5 and Section 11.2 (A-L). The record plans need to be submitted to the public works department. Recommendation The public works department recommends approval of the CUP, Preliminary and Final Plat and PUD application subject to the conditions above being addressed/completed by the applicant. C:\\Users\\ksobota\\AppData\\Local\\Microsoft\\Windows\\Temporary Internet Files\\Content.Outlook\\KPTSSHW8\\PP_FP_CUP_PUD West Vierling Acres (Hy Vee) 072716.docx 4 of 4 M E M O R A N D U M Date: July 11, 2016 To: City of Shakopee, MN From: Jacob J. Bongard, P.E. Chris Chromy, P.E., PTOE Subject: Traffic Impact Study Review Hy-Vee Development I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 52210 July 8, 2016 Jacob J. Bongard, P.E. Reg. No. Date Introduction The Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for the Hy-Vee Development in Shakopee, MN dated June, 2016 was reviewed to determine if and how the proposed development impacts the traveling public. Overall, the TIS appears to be accurate. The results indicate minimal levels of transportation concerns on an operational basis due to the development during the Opening year (2019) and Horizon Year (2029) evaluation periods. It is anticipated that these transportation concerns do not need to be mitigated as specified in the study for the opening year and horizon year. The Horizon Year with West End development build scenario will require mitigation of several study area intersections to accommodate future growth. Additional analysis is required with the West End development to understand impacts once a site plan is solidified. Forecasts Forecasts are provided for Opening Year (2019) with and without the site development and Horizon Year (2029) with the site development. A 2029 forecast with West End development is also included within the evaluation at the request of the City of Shakopee. The TIS forecasts appear to be consistent with the Site Plan. The TIS includes a 96,000 square foot grocery store, gasoline station/convenience market with 16 fueling positions, 10,000 square foot medical office building, and 200 attached multi-family dwelling units. The AM and PM forecasted trips appear to meet expectations. H:\\Shak\\T42112121\\2_Preliminary\\C_Reports\\2016-07-06_Hy-Vee TIS Review.docx Page 2 Public Roadway System Impacts It is anticipated that the development traffic would be primarily dispersed to Vierling Drive and Marystown Road (CSAH 15) as defined in the study. The traffic increase from the development (443-AM /931-PM trips during the peak hours) to other roadways and intersections is anticipated to be minimal when related to daily roadway capacity as noted below. Anticipated % Daily Max Volume Roadway Existing Proposed 2029 Growth Change Roadway to Capacity Segment AADT AADT Rates* in AADT Capacity** Ratio*** Vierling Dr 18,000 to 2,750 2.71 7,450 271% 0.42 22,000 (E of Marystown) Vierling Dr 18,000 to 2,550 1.19 3,040 19% 0.17 22,000 (W of Marystown) Marystown Road 18,000 to 4,400 1.17 5,150 17% 0.29 22,000 (S of TH 169) Marystown Road 18,000 to 6,700 1.51 10,120 51% 0.56 22,000 (N of TH 169) Adams Street 18,000 to 3,950 1.18 4,665 18% 0.26 22,000 (N of Vierling) *2029 daily growth rates are developed from applying the growth observed during the AM and PM peak hours **Daily Roadway Capacity Range based on Figure VI-6 of the Scott County 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update ***Lower volume threshold utilized Generally, a volume to capacity (V/C) ratio should be less than 1.00 with a goal of less than 0.85 to allow for increases during special events and other special conditions. All of the corridors discussed above have V/C ratios less than 0.85. The change in traffic volume is higher than 5% but volume to capacity levels are less than 0.6 for all locations. While the above applies, there will still be a noticeable change in traffic volume on Vierling Drive at peak times with back-ups exceeding 200 feet where they are minimal to non- existent today for the westbound left-thru approach lane at Marystown Road. Operations The studied intersections identified within the TIS decreased levels of service (LOS) due to the proposed Hy-Vee Commercial development. The evaluation reviewed the opening year (2019) and horizon year (2029) future traffic volumes. Due to minimal background growth anticipated within the study area, the proposed development is the key contributor to increased delays/queues anticipated in both the 2019 and 2029 build years. Marystown Road at Vierling Drive LOS decreases from A to B for the overall intersection in the PM peak hour. LOS decreases from A to C for the westbound movement in the PM peak hour. The increased delay to westbound is likely to create some backups from Marystown Road that are extended from 30 feet to 120 feet on average and from 50 feet to 225 feet for the 95 th-percentile queues. H:\\Shak\\T42112121\\2_Preliminary\\C_Reports\\2016-07-06_Hy-Vee TIS Review.docx Page 3 Review of the analysis indicates that there is acceptable storage length available in the westbound thru- left lane to accommodate the extended delays. While deemed to be adequate, the long backup may be a safety concern depending on the placement of the western-most Vierling Drive site driveway (Driveway 3). Longer backups in the thru-left lane during the PM peak hour may impact the sight lines for turning traffic onto Vierling Drive from the development site. Marystown Road at US 169 WB Ramps LOS decreases from A to C for the eastbound movement in the PM peak hour. The increased delay to eastbound is anticipated to extend average queues from one vehicle today to three vehicles in the future. While it is expected to increase average vehicle delay for the approach, the low volume approach is not expected to greatly influence the overall intersection delay. Westbound right turn th 95-percentile queues are expected to increase from 80 feet to 150 feet due to site-generated traffic, but this increase can be accommodated by the existing intersection. Marystown Road at US 169 EB Ramps LOS A is expected to be maintained during the AM and PM peak hours for the overall intersection and all individual movement. th Marystown Road at 17 Avenue S LOS A is expected to be maintained during the AM and PM peak hours for the overall intersection and all individual movement. Queue Analysis at Study Intersections The site plan for the commercial development includes three full access driveway locations along Vierling Drive and one right-in/right-out access on Marystown Road. The current placement of the driveways along Vierling Drive are as follows: Functional intersection design methodology is utilized to evaluate the placement of Driveway 3, the westernmost driveway, in relation in Driveway 2 and Marystown Road. The increase in westbound left turn movements at the Marystown Road/Vierling Drive intersection causes additional queueing to occur on the westbound approach. Anticipated queues for the Horizon Year (2029) build traffic volumes are provided below in conjunction with the required stopping sight distance based upon existing roadway speeds. The interaction of the additional queueing and the placement of driveway 3 develops a conflict in the design of the corridor. The table above indicates that the driveway should be placed a minimum of 320 H:\\Shak\\T42112121\\2_Preliminary\\C_Reports\\2016-07-06_Hy-Vee TIS Review.docx Page 4 feet from Marystown Road to accommodate the average queues and 423 feet to accommodate the 95 th- percentile queues. The placement of Driveway 4 along Marystown Road is also evaluated to ensure that vehicle interaction occurring at the driveway is independent of the decision making process at the intersection of Marystown Road at Vierling Drive. The proposed driveway location of 575 feet south of Vierling Drive appears acceptable as the value exceeds the 460-foot minimum to meet this criteria Crossroads Shopping Center In order to better define the scale of the proposed development and associated impact to the surrounding roadway network, a comparison is established to differentiate the proposed Hy-Vee Commercial site plan from the commercial properties in and around Crossroads Center, located west of Marschall Road on Vierling Drive. The following table provides a comparison between the key components associated with each development. A summary of the table above is as follows: The spacing of the parallel east-west roadways of TH 169 and Vierling Drive is greater at Marystown Road when comparted to CSAH 17 (Marschall Road). This spacing provides a greater potential to accommodate the growing traffic volumes associated with the proposed site development as well as other future traffic needs. The Hy-Vee supermarket is anticipated to be larger than the existing Cub Foods located in the Crossroad Center development, but the accompanying 5.7 acres of commercial and retail property proposed with the Hy-Vee property is far less than the nearly 25 acres that is present near or within the Crossroads Center Development. The existing land use surrounding the proposed Hy-Vee development site is primarily residential properties and parks. All of which are lesser traffic generators than the commercial development within close proximity to the Crossroads Center Development. H:\\Shak\\T42112121\\2_Preliminary\\C_Reports\\2016-07-06_Hy-Vee TIS Review.docx Page 5 Sight Distance Evaluation A field visit was completed to review the sight distance for the proposed driveway locations identified within the Hy-Vee TIS. Findings of this evaluation indicate that there are not likely to be any concerns with sight lines at the proposed locations barring the implementation of additional landscaping features with the proposed site. Images of the existing sight lines for three driveway locations can be found below. Vierling Drive at Driveway 2 Proposed Driveway Location Proposed Driveway Location -Looking West- -Looking East- Vierling Drive at Driveway 3 Proposed Driveway Location Proposed Driveway Location -Looking West- -Looking East- Marystown Road at Driveway 4 H:\\Shak\\T42112121\\2_Preliminary\\C_Reports\\2016-07-06_Hy-Vee TIS Review.docx Page 6 Marystown Road Driveway 4 Trail Crossing The proposed Hy-Vee development site has a right-in/right-out driveway located off Marystown Road where the City of Shakopee has identified a future trail connection. Because of the development and location of a future driveway, it is important to identify a suitable crossing location. It is recommended that the crossing be placed at a location where sight lines are directed towards the pedestrians crossing the driveway rather than focusing on the completing the exiting curve. The recommended crossing location is documented in the image below. POTENTIAL TRAIL CROSSING Intersection Capacity Utilization The TIS prepared for the Hy-Vee Commercial Development includes an evaluation of the impacts and necessary mitigation that accompanies the anticipated West End development. Through this evaluation, it was determined that either traffic signals or roundabouts would be required to alleviate delays and provide acceptable operations at the intersections of Marystown Road at Vierling Drive, US 169 WB th Ramps, and US 169 EB Ramps in the future. Additional mitigation is also expected at the 17 Avenue S intersection to accommodate the West End growth, but the Hy-Vee development is only a minor contributor to this based upon the assumed distribution of development trips. The table below reviews the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) for the three identified study area intersections. ICU is a high-level measure of how an intersection is functioning and how much extra capacity is available to handle traffic fluctuations and incidents. In this situation, it is a measure to evaluate the amount of capacity occupied by each of the anticipated background growth, Hy-Vee development traffic, and West End development traffic. The final value ts the percentage of the total increase in ICU that can be attributed to the Hy-Vee development during the AM and PM peak hours. This value acts as a high-level indicator to identify the portion of the total growth that can be attributed to the Hy-Vee H:\\Shak\\T42112121\\2_Preliminary\\C_Reports\\2016-07-06_Hy-Vee TIS Review.docx Page 7 development as well as the overall impact and role in causing each intersection to exceed acceptable levels of delay during the peak hours. From this evaluation, it is estimated that the Hy-Vee development accounts for approximately 35% and 49% of the future capacity utilized each of the studied intersections. It is assumed that the West End development occupies the remaining capacity. Conclusions and Recommendations The development impacts are identified in the study. There are anticipated to be delay increases and traffic backups more than what there is today at multiple study area intersections. Based on the analysis, the traffic backups are able to be accommodated within the existing roadway network with a slight modification to the placement of Driveway 3 along Vierling Drive. Sight distances appear adequate at each of the proposed driveway conditions due to minimal grades and little horizontal curvature in the study area roadways. Some items of note are mentioned below. Marystown Road at Vierling Drive The westbound left turn queues and delay within the thru-left lane for the AM and PM o peak hours is deemed to be acceptable. The additional traffic will be noticeable during the PM peak hour. The long backup may be a safety concern with the existing Driveway 3 placement 350 feet from the Marystown Road intersection. It is recommend that the driveway be moved to a location 400 feet east of the proposed location to provide additional spacing from the all-way stop controlled intersection while maintaining an acceptable distance from Driveway 2. The northbound right turn delay and queues are acceptable during the AM and PM peak o hours. Marystown Road at US 169 WB Ramps Impacts anticipated to be minimal. o Marystown Road at US 169 EB Ramps Impacts anticipated to be minimal. o Marystown Road at 17 th Avenue S Impacts anticipated to be minimal. o H:\\Shak\\T42112121\\2_Preliminary\\C_Reports\\2016-07-06_Hy-Vee TIS Review.docx Initial Resident Email Dear Kyle, It has been awhile since our last chat in regards to the Hy-Vee going into the land off of Vierling and Marystown road. I have expressed my concerns to you at the last meeting. I would like this opportunity to express concerns again. First let me prefaces that I do not object necessarily to the Hy-Vee going in. I feel that this will bring a lot of jobs to Shakopee and from what I have been told by many people that Hy-Vees are an up standing grocery store. Having said that, my concerns are this. I live at 875 Regent Drive. my property butts up against the field that the Hy-Vee wants to build on. I strongly feel that for the one year plus that they will be building there, there will be an extraordinary amount of noise from trucks, construction not to mention the amount of dirt blowing into my house through windows and vents. I do not want strange people walking through my yard at all hours day and night as this would be seen as a short cut. Also I am very concerned of lights from cars shinning in through my windows. (There would not be a guarantee that this would not happen.) I already have children walking through from the park that is across the street. I would propose that if Hy-Vee wants to build and they are the entity that started this whole thing to begin with that Hy-Vee builds a wall that will span across the back of all the houses in the Freedom town homes and even the single family homes that are currently here. This would solve a lot of noise issues, dirt blowing in and people walking through as a short cut, not to mention the car lights. I have already contacted the current president of Freedom town homes on this issue and got the response that there would not be funds available for Freedom town homes to pay and build this wall nor should they. I certainly can't afford this as well nor should I. Hy- Vee can certainly afford to pay for this extra addition as this is their idea to begin with, it should be on them. They have used the excuse that they have not bought the adjacent property and that if someone builds apartments that they would be responsible, well that is just passing the buck and will not take care of the noise from Hy-Vee building, dirt and dust, car lights and people using my quiet oases as there right to walk through. I have received the letter in the mail for the next meeting and now find out that they need consideration for a liquor license. I knew that on the day of the first meeting that there was more to what they were telling us and I was correct. The wall should be first priority then and only then they should be allowed to build. I do not believe that I am the only person raising concerns of putting a grocery store in with residential homes. I hope you will take this very important request into consideration. I look forward to your response before the next meeting. Sincerely, Teresa Schwartz Staff Response: Hi Teresa--- Thank you for the message. not be recommending that Hy-Vee install a wall as part of the development. The City has not required the installation of a wall in any instances of commercial areas adjacent to residential areas. We have required landscaping and sometimes fencing, but in this case, the nearest part of the commercial development We are recommending the installation of landscaping near the ponding areas that are adjacent to the Freedom Townhomes, which would act as a buffer from vehicle headlights and provide some noise mitigation. The closest part of the Hy-he Freedom Townhomes property, across two ponds and the extension of Harvest Lane. During construction the City has requirements for dust and erosion control on construction sites, as well as working hours for use of equipment. The Police Department can and has issued citations for these issues. The MPCA also has severe fines for sites that have erosion control issues. For pedestrian connections, there will be pedestrian connections along Harvest Lane and Vierling Drive to connect to the Hy-Vee development. The area adjacent to the Freedom Townhomes is a ponding area, so it is highly unlikely anyone would use that area as shortcut when there is a trail that avoids the ponding areas. In regards to the liquor license, the liquor license is for the liquor store and restaurant that are a part of the grocery store. th The Planning Commission will be reviewing this request on August 4 and there will be a public hearing where residents will be invited to speak on this project. I have included a copy of your message in the report for the Planning Commission to take into consideration when reviewing this project. If they believe a wall or other means are necessary, the Commission may add that as a recommendation for the City Council to consider when they review the project. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me. Kyle Sobota Resident Response after Planning Commission Meeting: Kyle, Thanks for your response. since my wife and I have had the chance to digest all that was said at the meeting Thursday and have gone through the documents that were given to her, needless to say me and my wife are very disappointed to find out that now we have a road going through our back yard, regardless of it being 300 yards this will still effect lights and noise. This was not brought up until this last meeting. It is very frustrating that we are not given any details as to the finished product of the ponds, dimensions of said pond. Hy-Vee states that it is not their responsibility at this point as that is not land they are purchasing, it would be the next faze with the apartment building. However, then the city should step in and let us know now what it could look like, say a berm high enough to block out car lights and noise or other suggestions like a fence since the wall was shot down. We strongly feel there should be separation between residential and commercial. At this point we will be seeking out legal help and blocking any further movement by HyVee or the city until we have the facts in hand that we need. This is our retirement home, we bought it as a quiet peaceful area with a field in the back yard that did not include a shopping center, liquor store, a road with noise at all hours of the night. This will change our lives going forward and we deserve to know exactly what things are going to look like before things move forward. Again we will not hesitate to block any further movement by HyVee or the city. Regards Greg and Teresa Schwartz Staff Response: Greg, Teresa--- The Hy-Vee development project has not been approved at this time. The City Council still needs to review the project at the meeting on August 16 th. The Planning Commission meeting last Thursday had a public hearing, where anyone in the audience was invited to speak regarding concerns about the project. Since none of the audience members asked to speak, the public hearing was closed. Questions on separation between the development and existing residential development for landscaping, berming, could have been asked at that time. The Planning Commission made their recommendation to the City Council based on what was presented to them. Harvest Lane has been proposed to be extended to Vierling Drive since the beginning, which was presented in plans at the neighborhood meeting and also for the rezoning at the Planning Commission meeting in June. There have not be any revisions to the plans regarding Harvest Lane. At the City Council meeting on August 16 th there is not a public hearing, but if someone would like to speak on this item during the review, the City Council typically allows questions or comments. If the project is approved, Harvest Lane would not be extended right away. We are not recommending that the street be extended until the apartment building is developed. It should be noted that I am recommending that the applicant have additional landscaping, such as evergreens adjacent to the ponding areas as additional screening for the existing townhomes. As I mentioned at the Planning Commission meeting, Hy-Vee is willing to provide landscaping off of their site to supplement the existing trees on the Freedom Townhomes common space. This would require approval of a plan by the Townhome Association, since the trees would not be on Hy- Please feel to contact me to discuss the application. I have provided a copy of your message and contact information to Hy-Vee for their reference. Kyle Sobota Resident Response: Kyle, Thanks for getting back to us. I have a question about what you call recommending. When you refer to "that I am recommending that the applicant have additional landscaping, such as evergreens adjacent to the ponding areas as additional screening for the existing townhomes". Does this mean that it will be done or does this mean it is suggested? Does my wife have to attend the meeting on the 16th of August in order for us to have it in writing that the evergreen trees will be put in place to block the views, noise, and lights as per our last letter. We have had conversation with the HOA and do not see any issues with getting any approvals at this point. Best Regards, Greg and Teresa Staff Response: Greg, Theresa--- Sorry for the confusion. I have the condition regarding additional landscaping as a condition of approval at this time in the draft approval document. The City Council could remove the condition if they choose to, b -Vee and Hy-Vee is agreeable to planting some additional landscaping. The conditions of approval are not an official requirement until the City Council actually takes action. Kyle Good morning, Kyle - If possible, could you please share this email with the Planning Commission prior to Thursday My family and I live at 1584 Harvest Lane, next to the current field. We are very excited and looking forward to this development moving forward. We want this development to be part of a walkable, livable neighborhood and not a completely separate entity. I have two concerns that I would appreciate the Planning Commission address as part of their discussions on August 4. 1.Please consider rotating the HyVee building 90º clockwise so that the front of the building faces Vierling Drive instead of Marystown. Situating in this direction would make a few key improvements: The truck traffic, garbages and loading dock areas would be situated against 169 o instead of facing the neighborhood and new apartments. This would reduce noise concerns and make the neighborhood aesthetically look better. Having the front of the building face Vierling Drive allows for much better o connection to the neighborhoods - especially by walking and biking. It is much more approachable and feels better to have the front of the building the main view to the neighborhoods as opposed to the back of a building. 2.The temporary cul-de- driveway. Our driveway currently slopes to meet the temporary cul-de-sac and will need to be regraded to slope appropriately to the road when the temporary cul-de-sac is removed. We would appreciate the Planning Commission further clarifying that our - and - de- curb. Thank you! Brad Tabke 1584 Harvest Ln Staff Response: Hi Brad--- I have forwarded your message and photo to the commissioners. Planning and Engineering staff have recently met with Hy-Vee regarding the extension of Harvest Lane. It was agreed that staff would not be recommending that Harvest Lane be extended until the apartment building develops. The apartment building and medical office building will require a final plat prior to development, at that time Harvest Lane would be extended. The Planning Commission and City Council may choose to require that the street be built with the grocery store, but it has been viewed as unnecessary until the apartment lot develops. Kyle RESOLUTION NO. 7761 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, APPROVING A RETAIL CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF WEST VIERLING ACRES FIRST ADDITION, AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A GAS STATION, CAR WASH, OPEN SALES LOT, AND OVER-HEIGHT STRUCTURE WHEREAS, Randy Downs, applicant, and Cal and Sharon Haasken, property owners, have made application for the Planned Unit Development of West Vierling Acres; and WHEREAS, the property upon which the request is being made is legally described as: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, which lies northerly of a line described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 12; thence run easterly on an azimuth of 93 degrees 28 minutes 45 seconds, along the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter for 244.37 feet; thence on an azimuth of 171 degrees 08 minutes 45 seconds, 755.81 feet; thence on an azimuth of 142 degrees 30 minutes 37 seconds 211.98 feet; thence on an azimuth of 112 degrees 33 minutes 47 seconds, 937.92 feet, more or less, to the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and there terminating, Scott County, Minnesota ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee did review the Retail Center Planned Unit Development on August 4, 2016, and WHEREAS, all required public notices regarding the public hearing for the Planned Unit Development were duly sent and posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee did review the Retail Center Planned Unit Development on August 16, 2016 and adopted the following findings: Criteria No. 1: Whether the proposed development is consistent in all respect with the comprehensive plan and with this section. Finding No.1: The comprehensive plan guides the area for highway commercial and multiple-family residential development, which is what the applicant is proposing. Criteria No. 2: Whether the proposed development, including deviations from design standards of the underlying zones, is compatible with surrounding land uses. Finding No. 2: The proposed deviations relating to additional gas station signage, an additional 2 units / acre for the residential component, and shared parking is compatible with surrounding land uses. Criteria No. 3: Whether the proposed development, including deviations from development standards of the underlying zone, provides adequate open space, circulation, parking, recreation, screening, and landscaping. Finding No. 3: No changes are proposed in regard to landscaping, open space, or screening. Only minor deviations from development standards are proposed as part of this development. Criteria No. 4: Whether the primary function of the PUD is to encourage development which will preserve and enhance the worthwhile, natural terrain characteristics and not force intense development to utilize all portions of a given site in order to arrive at the maximum density allowed. In evaluating each individual proposal, the recognition of this objective will be a basic consideration in granting approval or denial. Finding No. 4: Impervious surface percentages are not proposed to be increased as a result of this development. In this specific case, a PUD is required because of the size of the commercial component of the development. Criteria No. 5: Whether there exists an overall compatibility of land uses and overall appearance and compatibility of individual buildings to other site elements or to surrounding development. However, the architectural style of buildings shall not solely be a basis for denial or approval of a plan. Finding No. 5: The ultimate development of the PUD will provide for overall compatibility of land uses, buildings, and other site elements to the surrounding development. Criteria No. 6: Whether the proposed PUD plan would afford a greater general public benefit than would be realized under the underlying zoning district and/or general zoning provisions. Finding No. 6:The proposed PUD amendment allows for the flexibility to develop a creative site plan for commercial and residential uses that complement each other. The proposed PUD also allows for adequate pedestrian circulation to connect to the adjacent residential and park areas. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: That the Planned Unit Development Southbridge Crossings East is hereby amended to allow the development Southbridge Crossings East PUD in the following manner: 1.A sidewalk or trail must be installed along the west side of Harvest Lane within this subdivision to connect with existing trail along Vierling Drive at the time of construction of the extension of Harvest Lane. 2.Evergreen trees shall be planted along the west side of Outlot B to screen the view of the food store loading dock. 3.Landscaping must be provided on ponding outlots to screen the Freedom Townhomes. The applicant must work with City Engineering and Planning staff to provide an adequate plan for private utilities and landscaping in this area. 4.The applicant must work with the Freedom Townhomes Association to supplement the landscaping in the Freedom Townhomes common space along the western lot line of the Freedom Townhomes common space. This landscaping is intended to supplement the landscaping on Outlot B mentioned above. 5.A trail along the east side of Adams street shall be provided. The trail design and crossing of the entrance drive must be approved by the City Engineer. The portion of trail immediately north of the Adams Street access must be constructed immediately. The trail south of the Adams Street access may be constructed when a pedestrian connection across US 169 is provided. The applicant must provide an escrow for future construction of this segment of trail in an amount acceptable to the Engineering Department. 6.The east elevation of the grocery store must include the additional brick sections as shown on the revised plan submitted to planning staff on August 4, 2016. 7.Bike racks meeting APBP guidelines shall be provided at the medical office (4), food store (10), convenience store (4), and apartment building (10). Minimum Capacities are noted. 8.Signage must be provided that trucks must not use Harvest Lane. 9.All freestanding signage within the development must be monument style signs and comply with city code standards on height and signage area. 10.The gas station / convenience store, car wash, and grocery store are permitted to share parking, as the grocery store has excess parking. 11.Trash and refuse pick up must comply with the noise ordinance for working hours. 12.Trash enclosures must be constructed of the same materials as the principal structures and have a roof. 13.A third gas station canopy sign consistent with the submitted plans is approved. 14.A pedestrian connection from the apartment building to the grocery store must be provided. The following relates to the proposed Preliminary and Final Plat of West Vierling Acres First Addition WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, which lies northerly of a line described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 12; thence run easterly on an azimuth of 93 degrees 28 minutes 45 seconds, along the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter for 244.37 feet; thence on an azimuth of 171 degrees 08 minutes 45 seconds, 755.81 feet; thence on an azimuth of 142 degrees 30 minutes 37 seconds 211.98 feet; thence on an azimuth of 112 degrees 33 minutes 47 seconds, 937.92 feet, more or less, to the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and there terminating, Scott County, Minnesota ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee reviewed the preliminary and final plat on August 4, 2016 and recommended that the City Council approve both the preliminary and final plat of West Vierling Acres First Addition; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the preliminary and final plat on August 16, 2016. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota that the preliminary and final plat of West Vierling Acres First Addition is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: I)The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the Final Plat: 1.The name of the plat shall be renamed West Vierling Acres First Addition 2.Execution of a dagreement, which will include provisions for security for public improvements within the subdivision and payment of the Street and Utility Fee and the Watermain Fee. 3.Payment of all Storm Water Management Plan Review Fees need to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 4.Payment of the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge and the Valley Industrial Park and Valley Industrial Park II connection charges need to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 5.Payment of the applicable Trunk Storm Water Charge needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 6.Payment of the Sign Installation Fee needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 7.Payment of the Bituminous Sealcoat Fee needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 8.The applicant will submit a detailed all public improvements associated with this subdivision. 9.The applicant will submit a detailed lot area drawing showing the total plat area, the total drainage and utility easement area encompassing high water levels of publicly maintained storm water basins, the total area of right-of-way, the total area of conservation easements and outlots, the total area of public bituminous street and the total area of each lot. 10.The applicant will need, at a minimum, conditional approval of the storm water management plan. 11.The applicant will submit a detailed geotechnical report outlining any groundwater encountered as well as infiltration rates in appropriate locations. 12.The applicant will agree to move the westernmost Vierling Drive access 50-feet to the east. 13.Provide additional right-of-way along Vierling Drive to a line offset one foot in a southerly direction from the southernmost edge of the existing bituminous trail. Provide additional right-of-way, in the form sight triangles 15-feet in dimension, at the intersection between Vierling Drive and Harvest Lane. 14.Easements will be shown on the final plat as approved by the city engineer. They include, but are not be limited to, the following: Minimum drainage and utility easements for public sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems need to be dedicated per Section 10.1 (A-D) of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria. Easements for public utilities need to be centered on the alignments. Provide a minimum of 15-feet of drainage and utility easement adjacent to the US- 169, Adams Street and Vierling Drive rights-of-way. Provide a minimum of ten feet of drainage and utility easement adjacent to the Harvest Lane right-of-way. 15.Provide electronic files (AutoCAD and Portable Document Format PDF) of the final plat to be recorded with datum on the Scott County coordinate system. 16.The applicant must comply with the conditions of the MnDOT memorandum dated July 21, 2016. 17.The applicant must comply with the comments provided by Bolton and Menk, Inc. from the review of the traffic impact study. The applicant will reimburse the Engineering Department for the review costs incurred for Bolton and Menk, Inc traffic impact study for this development. 18.Payment of park dedication fees based on net acreage is required prior to recording of the final plat based on the current fee schedule. The applicant must submit a net acreage calculation to the Parks and Recreation Director for review. 19.Payment of all special assessments on this property is required prior to recording of the final plat. 20.The applicant must coordinate the water service plan for all developable lots with Shakopee Public Utilities. The following items need to be addressed / completed prior to approval of a grading permit and/or a building permit: 1.Payment of the applicable Trunk Storm Water Charge needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 2. plan. 3.The applicant will obtain a NPDES construction site permit prior to any land disturbing activity. PDFs of the coverage card and letter will be provided to the city. 4.The applicant will submit a detailed impervious surface coverage drawing with each building permit adding impervious surface. 5.The applicant will remove the existing Adams Street access to the property. 6.The applicant will grade the entire site, as proposed on the approved plans, in one phase within one year from the date of approval of the grading permit application. Grading is defined as bringing the site to the proposed finished grade with materials deemed acceptable by the public works department, providing topsoil per city requirements and applying seed, mulch and/or sod per city requirements and providing an as-built record grading plan per Section 2.5 of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria. 7.The applicant will line all storm water basins with a minimum of two feet of clay from the bottom to the normal water level. However, the city engineer can allow this requirement to be reduced to one foot if the material meets certain specifications. 8.The applicant will revise the designs of all applicable storm water basins to remove the side slopes from within rights-of-way and required drainage and utility easements adjacent to Adams Street, Vierling Drive and Harvest Lane. 9.The applicant will place class IV fieldstone riprap and geotextile fabric at each flared end section in the city maintained storm water basin. The riprap and fabric will be installed to the bottom of the storm water basin. 10.The applicant will seed the city maintained storm water basin area with a native wetland vegetation. The seed mixture, application and maintenance requirements will be determined by the city engineer or their assign. 11.The developer responsible for the extension of Harvest Lane submit detailed pavement design calculations for the Harvest Lane extension. 12.Sanitary sewer and storm sewer will be extended as necessary to accommodate future development of all outlots. 13.No landscaping will be allowed in drainage and utility easements, unless a detailed plan is submitted clearly showing how all lots will be served by private utilities. All applicable private utility companies will need to review and approve this plan prior to its submittal to the city. 14.The applicant will submit construction plans for all public improvements, including the Harvest Lane extension, the bituminous trail extension, the public sanitary sewer extension and the public storm sewer extension. These plans will be in compliance with requirements set forth in Section 11 of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria. 15.As part of the Harvest Lane extension, the applicant will remove the temporary cul-de- sac east of their site and re-grade / replace the driveways of the impacted residential units and provide top soil and establish turf in the appropriate areas. 16.Prior to work in the MNDoT right-of-way, a permit will be required. Please contact MnDOT for details. 17.The city and the county are in the process of transferring ownership/jurisdiction of the Adams Street right-of-way to the city. However, if this process is delayed, the applicant will need to obtain a permit from Scott County prior to construction. Please contact Scott County for details. 18.Prior to work in the Adams Street and Vierling Drive rights-of-way, a right-of-way permit will be required. Please contact the senior public works technician for details. 19.Record plans need to be provided per the City of Shakopee Design Criteria, Section 2.5 and Section 11.2 (A-L). The record plans need to be submitted to the public works department. 20.The landscape plan must comply with city details and planting guidelines. 21.The landscape islands in the parking lots must comply with area and soil volume guidelines. 22.Ash, Maple, and Spruce trees do not count toward landscaping requirements due to over-planting and insect / disease issues. 23.Financial security for landscaping will be required at the time of building permits. The following relates to the Conditional Use Permit requests for multiple principal structures on one lot, gas station, car wash, and open sales lot: WHEREAS, proper public hearing notices were sent, published and posted, and on August 4, 2016 a public hearing was held on the requested Conditional Use Permits before the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the requests and recommended that the City Council approve the proposed conditional use permits for multiple principal structures on one lot, gas station, car wash, and open sales lot; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed conditional use permit request for multiple principal structures on one lot, gas station, car wash, open sales lot, and over- height structure; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request for an over-height structure and recommended that the City Council deny the request for an apartment building six feet taller than the City Code allows, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA , that it adopts the following findings relative to the request for Conditional Use Permits. CUP Criteria and Proposed Findings: Criteria #l The use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity; Finding #1: The City Council has not received any evidence that the proposed conditional uses will be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the vicinity, if conducted in accordance with proposed conditions. Criteria #2 The amendment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant property for uses allowed in the area; Finding #2: The City Council finds that the approval of the conditional use permits will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property. Criteria #3 Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and other necessary facilities have been or will be provided; Finding#3: The City Council finds that adequate utilities, access, drainage and other necessary facilities have been or will be provided for the site. Criteria #4 The use is consistent with the purposes of the zone in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use; and Finding #4 The Board finds that this use is consistent with the purposes of the Highway Business (B-1) and Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) Zone. Criteria #5 The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Finding #5 The Board finds that the use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Conditional Use Permit to allow multiple principal structures on one lot, a gas station, car wash, open sales lot, and over-height structure is approved subject to the following conditions: 1.Development of the gas station, car wash, and apartment building must be generally consistent with the submitted plans and recommended conditions. 2.Dryers for the car wash must meet noise ordinance standards. 3.A Garden Center is approved to be located in either the southern area of the parking lot, as shown on the site plan, or the Garden Center may be located in the easternmost portion of the parking area north of the grocery store. The Garden Center is approved to operate for up to 60 days in a calendar year and must not block drive aisles within the parking lot. The applicant must receive the appropriate permits for any temporary structures. 4.The under canopy lighting for the gas station must mounted flush with the bottom of the canopy. 5.The gas station canopy is permitted to have three signs. Sign area must comply with City Code standards. 6.At least two additional landscape islands that meet City Code standards must be added to the middle row of parking for the apartment building. 7.The height of the apartment building is not permitted to exceed 41' in height, when measured at the mid-point of the roof. Building design and materials must be generally consistent with the submitted plans. 8.The location of the apartment building and proposed landscaping quantities must be generally consistent with the submitted plan. Planting species, quantities, soil volume and area of landscape islands must comply with City Code. 9.A liquor license is required prior to opening of any premises intended for the sale or consumption of alcohol. 10.The service of alcohol in the restaurant and patio area of the grocery store building after 10:00 p.m. is approved. Adopted in ___________session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held on the ____ day of _________, 2016. ____________________________ Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: ______________________________ Lori Hensen, City Clerk PREPARED BY: City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 RESOLUTION NO. 7758 A RESOLUTION ANNEXING PROPERTY FROM JACKSON TOWNSHIP PURSUANT TO AN EXISTING ORDERLY ANNEXATION AGREEMENT WHEREAS into a Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation between the Town of Jackson & the City of , that was filed with the Minnesota Municipal Board on October 11, 2002, accepted by the Municipal Board on November 8, 2002, and which is identified as Docket No. OA-882 WHEREAS , the entire Town was designated for future annexation under the Orderly Annexation Agreement and the City may annex property from the Town in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Orderly Annexation Agreement; WHEREAS , Scott County requested that the City annex approximately 79.27 acres of public right-of-way within the Town as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and as legally described in the attached Exhibit B WHEREAS , the Annexation Area encompasses portions of State Highway 169 and County Road 15, and no one lives within the Annexation Area; WHEREAS , the City has notified the Town of the request it received from Scott County to annex the Annexation Area; WHEREAS , the City finds and determines as follows with respect to the requested annexation of the Annexation Area: a.Under Section II, paragraph 7 of the Orderly Annexation Agreement, the City may at any time, without a petition of the property owners, annex undeveloped property, or multiple properties, within the Township which are at least fifty (50) percent surrounded by the municipal boundary of the City, based on the pe b. satisfies the minimum 50% required by the Orderly Annexation Agreement; 483857v3 TJG SH155-377 c.Section II, paragraph 7 of the Orderly Annexation A which is tax exempt, publicly owned, utilized for utility or transportation purposes, or other ; d.Because the Annexation Area is tax exempt public right-of-way used for transportation purposes, it property Annexation Agreement and is subject to annexation by the City without an owner petition; e.\[w\]here property is annexed that is publicly owned or is currently exempt from local property taxes, the exemption shall be maintained and no reimbursement shall be required from the City to the f.Because the Annexation Area is not subject to local property taxes, the City is not required to make a payment to the Town as reimbursement for lost property taxes; g.Annexation of the Annexation Area will not cause the City to exceed the 250 acre annual area limit set out in Section IV, paragraph 1 of the Orderly Annexation Agreement; h.Because this annexation is initiated by the City under the Orderly Annexation Agreement and not by owner petition, the utility service notice requirement under Minn. Stat. § 414.0325, subd. 1a does not apply; and i.The City determines that annexing the Annexation Area pursuant to this Resolution is consistent with the terms and conditions of the Orderly Annexation Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED , by the City Council of the City of Shakopee as follows: 1.The recitals set out above and the exhibits attached hereto are incorporated in and made part of this Resolution. 2.The Annexation Area shown on the attached Exhibit A, and legally described in the attached Exhibit B, is hereby annexed into the municipal boundaries of the City of Shakopee effective upon the issuance of the Chief Administrative Law Judge. 3.Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 414.0325, subd. 1(h) and Section I, paragraph 2 of the Orderly Annexation Agreement, the Chief Administrative Law Judge may review and comment, but shall, within thirty (30) days, order the annexation in accordance with the terms of this Resolution. 4.The Annexation Area is not subject to local property taxes and, pursuant to the Orderly Annexation Agreement, the City is not required to make any tax reimbursement payment to the Town related to this annexation. 483857v3 TJG SH155-377 5.City staff is authorized and directed to file this Resolution with the Office of Administrative Hearings - . 6.In the event the Boundary Adjustments Office identifies any errors, omissions, or other problems with the attached map or legal description, City staff is hereby authorized to make such corrections as may be needed to accomplish the purpose of this Resolution. Adopted in adjourned regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this ______ day of ______________________, 2016. __________________________________________ Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: __________________________ Lori Hensen, City Clerk 483857v3 TJG SH155-377 EXHIBIT A Map of Annexation Area A-1 483857v3 TJG SH155-377 EXHIBIT B Legal Description of Annexation Area That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section 14; thence due south along the east line of said Section 14, a distance of 16.5 feet to the point of beginning of Tract A to be described; thence due west parallel to the north line of said Section 14, a distance of 416 feet; thence due south parallel to the east line of said section, a distance of 208 feet; thence due east parallel to the north line of said section, a distance of 416 feet to a point on the east line of said section; thence due north along the east line of said section, a distance of 208 feet to the point of beginning. TOGETHER WITH That part of the Northeast Quarter, Section 14, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota, which is denoted and shown as Parcel 49 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 70-15, according to the record plat thereof, on file in the Office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota. TOGETHER WITH The East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of said Section 14, distant 1254 feet north of the east quarter corner thereof; thence West at right angles 150 feet; thence North at right angles 146 feet; thence East at right angles 150 feet to the east line of said Section 14; thence South to the point of beginning; excepting therefrom the east 33 feet thereof. TOGETHER WITH That part of the East 33.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter, Section 14, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota, which lies north of the following described line: Beginning at Right of Way Boundary Corner B513 as shown on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 70-15, according to the record plat thereof, on file in the Office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota; thence on an azimuth of 268 degrees 29 minutes 48 seconds, along the boundary of said plat, a distance of 33.00 feet to Right of Way Boundary Corner B14, and said line there terminating. EXCEPT that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section 14; thence due south along the east line of said Section 14, a distance of 16.5 feet to the point of beginning of Tract A to be described; thence due west parallel to the north line of said Section 14, a distance of 416 feet; thence due south parallel to the east line of said section, a distance of 208 feet; thence due east parallel to the north line of said section, a distance of 416 feet to a point on the east line of said section; thence due north along the east line of said section, a distance of 208 feet to the point of beginning. B-1 483857v3 TJG SH155-377 TOGETHER WITH The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota, excepting therefrom the south 7 rods thereof; also excepting therefrom that part described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Section 13, distant 685.6 feet south of the northwest corner thereof; thence run south along said west section line for 320 feet; thence east at right angles to said west line for 207.65 feet; thence north at right angles for 320 feet; thence west at right angles for 207.65 feet to the point of beginning; and also excepting therefrom that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at Right of Way Boundary Corner B27 as shown on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered 70-2 as the same is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for said county; thence southerly on an azimuth of 179 degrees 05 minutes 21 seconds along the boundary of said Plat No. 70-2 for 702.84 feet to Right of Way Boundary Corner B28; thence on an azimuth of 273 degrees 02 minutes 06 seconds along the boundary of said plat for 1259.46 feet; thence northerly for 163.12 feet on a non-tangential curve, concave to the east, having a radius of 2764.80 feet, a delta angle of 03 degrees 22 minutes 49 seconds and a chord azimuth of 04 degrees 15 minutes 44 seconds; thence on tangent to said curve on an azimuth of 05 degrees 57 minutes 09 seconds for 114.91 feet; thence on an azimuth of 95 degrees 57 minutes 10 seconds for 526.36 feet; thence on an azimuth of 59 degrees 22 minutes 42 seconds for 812.22 feet to the point of beginning. TOGETHER WITH That part contained within the following described tract: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Section 13, distant 685.6 feet south of the northwest corner thereof; thence run south along said west section line for 320 feet; thence east at right angles to said west line for 207.65 feet; thence north at right angles for 320 feet; thence west at right angles for 207.65 feet to the point of beginning. TOGETHER WITH That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 13, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota, which is denoted and shown as Parcel 51B on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 70-2, according to the record plat thereof, on file in the Office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota. TOGETHER WITH That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 13, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota, which is denoted and shown as Parcel 52 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 70-2, according to the record plat thereof, on file in the Office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota. TOGETHER WITH That part of the East Half of the Northwest Quarter, Section 13, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota, which is denoted and shown as Parcel 52A on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 70-2, according to the record plat thereof, on file in the Office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota. B-2 483857v3 TJG SH155-377 TOGETHER WITH The East 33.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 13, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota. TOGETHER WITH That part of the East 33.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 13, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota, which lies north of the following described line: Beginning at Right of Way Boundary Corner B219 as shown on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 70-2, according to the record plat thereof, on file in the Office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota; thence on an azimuth of 269 degrees 39 minutes 52 seconds, along the boundary of said plat, a distance of 33.00 feet to Right of Way Boundary Corner B20, and said line there terminating. TOGETHER WITH That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 13, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota, which is denoted and shown as Parcel 51B on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 70-3, according to the record plat thereof, on file in the Office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota. TOGETHER WITH That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 13, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota, which is denoted and shown as Parcel 49 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 70-20, according to the record plat thereof, on file in the Office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota. TOGETHER WITH The West 33.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 13, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota. TOGETHER WITH That part of the West 33.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 13, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota, which lies north of the following described line: Beginning at Right of Way Boundary Corner B219 as shown on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 70-20, according to the record plat thereof, on file in the Office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota; thence on an azimuth of 89 degrees 39 minutes 52 seconds, along the boundary of said plat, a distance of 50.00 feet to Right of Way Boundary Corner B28, and said line there terminating. B-3 483857v3 TJG SH155-377 TOGETHER WITH That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 13, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Scott County, Minnesota, which is denoted and shown as Parcel 49 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 70-20, according to the record plat thereof, on file in the Office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota, and which lies northerly, westerly, and northerly of the following described line: Beginning at Right of Way Boundary Corner B23 as shown on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 70-20, according to the record plat thereof, on file in the Office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota; thence westerly a distance of 861.14 feet along the boundary of said plat being a non-tangential curve concave to the north, having a radius of 11609.16 feet, a delta angle of 04 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds and a chord azimuth of 266 degrees 11 minutes 52 seconds to Right of Way Boundary Corner B64; thence on an azimuth of 250 degrees 31 minutes 19 seconds, along the boundary of said plat, a distance of 160.29 feet to Right of Way Boundary Corner B65; thence on an azimuth of 179 degrees 04 minutes 22 seconds, along the boundary of said plat, a distance of 160.00 feet to Right of Way Boundary Corner B66; thence on an azimuth of 269 degrees 24 minutes 02 seconds, along the boundary of said plat, a distance of 135.24 feet to Right of Way Boundary Corner B67 and said line there terminating. TOGETHER WITH The West 33.00 feet of the following described property: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 115, Range 23, Scott County, Minnesota described as follows; Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence southerly along the west line thereof a distance of 207.26 feet to the point of beginning, thence easterly at right angles a distance of 350.00 feet; thence southerly at right angles a distance of 350.00 feet; thence westerly at right angles a distance of 350.00 feet to said west line; thence northerly along said west line a distance of 350.00 feet to the point of beginning. TOGETHER WITH The West 33.00 feet of the following described property: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 115, Range 23, Scott County, Minnesota described as follows; Beginning at a point on the west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter 719.36 feet north of the southwest corner thereof; thence North 1 degree 1 minute 25 seconds West, assumed basis for bearings, along said West line, 63.64 feet; thence North 88 degrees 58 minutes 35 seconds East a distance of 350.00 feet; thence South 1 degree 1 minute 25 seconds East, parallel with said West line a distance of 65.54 feet; thence South 89 degrees 17 minutes 12 seconds West a distance of 350.01 feet to said West line. B-4 483857v3 TJG SH155-377 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 16-5 RESOLUTION APPROVING COMPLIANCE DATE EXTENSION WITH RESPECT TO BUSINESS SUBSIDIES PROVIDED TO SHUTTERFLY, INC. WHEREAS, Ryan Companies US, Inc., a Minnesota corporation,has constructed an approximately 187,000 square foot building for use as a manufacturing facility, office, and call center (the “Minimum Improvements”), on real property (the “Development Property”) located in the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the “City”), and Shutterfly, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Developer”), leases the Minimum Improvements and purchase equipment in order to operate a manufacturing facility with related office, and call center space within the Minimum Improvements; and WHEREAS, the City, the Economic Development Authority for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the “Authority”), Scott County, Minnesota (the “County”), and the Developer entered into a Contract for Private Development, dated October 8, 2014 (the “Contract”), pursuant to which the Developer agreed to develop the Minimum Improvements and the City, the Authority, and the County agreed to provide certain economic assistance to reimburse the Developer for certain costs related to the purchaser of equipment needed forits manufacturing facility; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Contract and an Agreement for Loan of Minnesota Investment Fund –Forgivable Loan, dated June 10, 2016 (the “MIF Loan Agreement”), the Authority agreed to provide the Developer with the proceeds of a Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development – Minnesota Investment Fund Grantin the amount of $1,000,000 (the “MIF Loan”); and WHEREAS, the economic assistance provided by Authorityto the Developer constitutes a business subsidy under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 to 116J.995, as amended (the “Business Subsidy Act”); and WHEREAS, Section 7.1of the MIF Loan Agreementincludes certain job and wage goals to be satisfied by the Developer prior to the compliance date set forth in the MIF Loan Agreement(the “Compliance Date”), and if such goals are not met the Developer is required to repay all or a portion of the MIF Loan and to make payments to the Authorityor reduce the payments received as described in Section 4.4 of the MIF Loan Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Developer has requested an extension of the Compliance Date for up to one year; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City held a duly noticed public hearing on behalf of the Authority as required by Section116J.994, subdivision 5 of the Business Subsidy Act on August 3, 2016, regarding the extension of the Compliance Date; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: 484466v1 JAE SH155-316 1.The recitals set forth in this resolution are incorporated into and made a part hereof. 2.The Compliance Date is hereby extended to August 1,2017, and such extension is deemed to be made a part of the MIF Loan Agreement. 3.The Presidentandthe Executive Directorare authorized and directed to execute any documents or certificates necessary to carry out the transactions described herein. 4.Except as specifically amended by this resolution, the MIF Loan Agreementis hereby ratified and confirmed and remains in full force and effect. 5.Authoritystaff and consultants are authorized to take all further actions necessary to assist the Authorityin performing its obligations under this resolution and the MIF Loan Agreement. Sworn and Executed Under My Hand this 16th day of August, 2016. President Executive Director 2 484466v1 JAE SH155-316 July 20, 2016 Samantha DiMaggio Economic Development Coordinator City of Shakopee 129 Holmes St. S. Shakopee MN 55379 Dear Ms. DiMaggio: Minnesota continues to have a strong economy fueled by a growing business community. Many of these business expansions would not have occurred in Minnesota but for important investments by the Minnesota luding the City of Shakopee. Shutterfly is a prime example of a company that could have located anywhere but chose Minnesota for a variety of reasons including modest (relative to what other areas offer) state and local financial assistance. The return on this investment has been strong $35 million in investment and 230 new full-time equivalent jobs earning an average hourly wage of nearly $24. It is important to note that the jobs do not include the large number of contractors that work at the facility throughout the year. As you know, while this performance is impressive, the company will not achieve the 258 full-time equivalent jobs it committed to creating by August 1, 2016 upon receiving the Minnesota Investment Fund assistance. However, Shutterfly is working to add to its headcount and expects to easily surpass the job creation goal in the coming months. As a result of these efforts as well as the overall return on the local and state assistance, the department supports providing a one-year extension to this job creation deadline as allowed under the business subsidy law Minnesota Statutes 116J.994. If Shutterfly is unable to meet the job creation goals, a pro-rata portion of the forgivable loan will be repaid. Thank you for your commitment to a providing more quality jobs for Minnesotans. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Kevin McKinnon Deputy Commissioner Economic Development Division 1st National Bank Building 332 Minnesota Street Suite E200 Saint Paul Minnesota 55101-1351 651-259-7114 800-657-3858 651-296-3900 http://mn.gov/deed PHONETOLL FREE TTY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER AND SERVICE PROVIDER e Aceilinti*1 I ill...11 illi Lace I 1.- .1..., spa*, tit ...., . :It . 1 tionri AIIIIIIIIktri `1 , ...ammo." Plu! rt rx im .•' C CL. Cl Flt- ( I , -• - i - • . ow , . . •....- ,... • T-4 • • ..1% ‹) , ri -,,......... 1 CO '.: • .„, ix.. .... I.• , C/) 1 $...■4 P-0 ,,, \ 4.' ri ,. btl _ ---•-• 41 rr I ell ' ;': • 1 ' ,.. ao • ; 1 , .. . 1 . "will 40 tff r < 1 : .- t D ,... . ,, ...,...., 1 i' Cn 1• k 4' -44 St . 4 City, County, and MIF Requirements Headcount •258 new full-time equivalent within two •230 new full-time equivalent employees as of May years of issuing Certificate of Completion 2016 (Date Agreed upon by City and State is August 1, 2014; County using CIO for •Currently have 18 open requisitions and 20 additional Building as trigger date -May 27,2014) headcount approved, which Shutterfly is working to fill •Development Agreement requires a total new headcount of 329 FTE's within five kyears for the City and County Tax ._` Abatement Wages •An average of $18.78 per hour exclusive of •Shutterfly employees have an average salary of i �, benefits $24.81 per hour Q_ SHUTTERFLY 0 . ..N ` 1 - (0)))JLL City, County, and MIF Requirements Agreement Requirements Shutterfly Current Status Capital •Shutterfly must sign a lease with •Lease in place with the Landlord who spent Requirements Landlord to build Minimum approximately $26,000,000 in constructing the building Improvements •Shutterfly has spent approximately $34 million in •Shutterfly to install $32,000,000 in equipment and has a lease in place with the Landlord equipment •Additionally, Shutterfly has spent another $10,000,000 in manufacturing equipment as of 3/31/16 •Total Capital Investment: $70,000,000 MVO SHUTTERFLY 4:0 Ar:d' ` (0) JLL City, County, and MIF Requirements Property •City and County abated its portion of •Shutterfly will pay approximately $680,000 in property Taxes the property taxes at 90% for nine taxes in 2016 years •Shutterfly will receive a maximum total of $176,046 annually (combined City and County abatements) Timing •Shutterfly must complete the job •Shutterfly is requesting to exercise the one year creation by August 1, 2016 extension documented in the agreement. Ann4, ,1„e ciPer p, , 401 ;iv 41411to SHUTTERFLY - (( ))JLL Impact of Employment (Commitment vs. Actual) Committed No. of Jobs 258 Committed Avg. Wages 18.78 per hour Annual Payroll (est.) 10,078,099 Actual No. of Jobs Created 230 Actual Avg. Wages Paid 24.81 per hour Actual Payroll (est.) 11,869,104 tr Actual Annual Payroll in Excess of Commitment 1,791,005 Actual 10-Yr. Payroll in Excess of Commitment 17,910,048 '' In summary: Shutterfly actual average wage payments for a lesser amount of employees has a larger economic value than the commitment for a greater number of jobs at a lesser average wage rate. Not included in the analysis are the 600+ temporary/contract employees that Shutterfly employs on an annual basis. 171% SHUTTERFLY ® , ' , (( j)JLL Property Tax Contributions (actual) (actual) (actual) 2014 2015 2016 2017 201S 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Ts`* Land&Budding 3,950,000 6,500,000 16,500,000 16,830,000 17,166,600 17,509,932 17,860,131 18,217,333 18,581,680 18,953,314 19,332,380 Tax Basis 3.950;000 6,500,000 16,500,000 16,830,000 17,166,600 17,509,932 17,860,131 18,217,333 18,581,680 18,953,314 19,332,380 Tax Categories Scott County 15,689 30,473 75,836 77,353 78,900 80,478 82,087 83,729 85,404 87,112 88,854 1,159,460 City of Shakopee 16,367 31,492 79,456 81,045 82,666 84,320 86,006 87,726 89,481 91,270 93,096 1,214,304 State General - 65,711 160;150 163,353 166,621 169,953 173,352 176,819 180,355 183,963 187,642 2,416,773 1SD-Voter Approved 11,095 21,863 90,222 92,026 93,867 95,744 97,659 99,612 101,605 103,637 105,709 1,357,445 ISD-Other Levies 3,506 14,241 42;204 43,048 43,909 44,787 45,683 46,596 47,528 48,479 49,448 637,311 Met Council 409 797 1,932 1,970 2,010 2,050 2,091 2,133 2,175 2,219 2,263 29,564 Mosquito Control 211 405 989 1,009 1,029 1,049 1,070 1,092 1,114 1,136 1,159 15,132 Met Transit 642 1,268 3,112 3,174 3,238 3,303 3,369 3,436 3,505 3,575 3,646 47,596 Scott County CDA 665 1,307 3,442 3,511 3,581 3,653 3,726 3,800 3,876 3,954 4,033 52,505 Lower MN Watershed 274 522 1,278 1,304 1,330 1,356 1,383 1,411 1,439 1,468 1,497 19,55' Fiscal Disparity - 74,469 179,731 183,326 186,993 190,732 194,547 198,438 202,407 206,455 210,584 2,712,985 Non-ISD Levies - 348 999 1,018 1,039 1,060 1,081 1,102 1,124 1,147 1,170 15,00' Special Assess.-Pnncipal 27,771 27,771 27,771 28,327 28,893 29,471 30,060 30,662 31,275 31,900 32,538 463.31 Special Assess.-Interest(est.) 16.038 14,580 13,122 13,384 13,652 13,925 14,204 14,488 14,777 15,073 15,374 223.25: Total Real Estate Tax 92.666 285.246 680.244 693,849 707,726 721,880 '36.318 '51.044 '66.065 781,387 79'.014 10.364.119 Effective Rate(prior to Specials) 0.012369 003-36S 0.035749 0.038749 0.038749 0.038749 0.038749 0.038749 0.038749 0.038749 0.038749 Scenario 1 Abatement Scott County - - 68.252 69.61' 71,010 72,430 73,879 75,356 76,863 78.401 79,969 665,77" City of Shakopee - - '1,511 -2. 41 74,400 75,999 77,405 78,954 80,533 82,143 83,786 697,560 Total - 139.763 142.'.S 145410 148.319 151,284 154,310 157,396 160,544 163,755 1,363,337 A r;:tliti, , , . ., ,r.„,, ..--- 1) kill P 1120 . k \ * SHUTTERFLY ® � ,� JI-I- r,....0e. Community Involvement Through financial support and active volunteerism, Shutterfly is dedicated to being a valuable member of the local community. The following list represents some of the charities and events that Shutterfly supports in and around Shakopee. • CAPS (Shakopee High School) • Charter member—provide meeting spaces for class and internships in digital design • Donated 250—300 backpacks per year to underprivileged students • Ford Next Generation Learning Academy Steering Team (Shakopee High School) • Jamie Riddle is a member. Shutterfly will play some part in the academies by teaching, donating equipment, and other volunteer activities. • YMCA Charity & Fundraisersoia Shutterfly employees donate a significant amount of time to these events. 40 Shutterfly volunteers 4.1 participated in the Lakefest Music Festival this year. • Feed My Starving Children • Shutterfly employees donate time to food packing sessions during the year. • VFW, Fallen Soldier organizations,and local chamber charity events • Shutterfly does multiple printing projects for local charities • MRCI WorkSource • Shutterfly spends over$90,000 per year to provide individuals with disabilities work opportunities at the Shakopee facility. - Ct. , I Fir�, A '".. ift '41t4111 SHUTTERFLY • )JLI. Community Involvement • Shutterfly Foundation Team Events • Financial contributions to local charities and employees time dedicated to cleaning up playgrounds and other community projects. • Blood Drives • Shutterfly sponsors blood drives for the local community. • Minnesota Valley Transit Authority • Shutterfly is collaborating with private and public partners to create additional transit to Shakopee. • Shakopee Chamber • Shutterfly donates printed materials and provides monetary support for several fundraisers, such as: Golf Tournament, Red Whites & Brews, and Halloween in the Park. 4.1 �, • Local Business Support • Shutterfly spends over$100,000 per year on team meals and events in the Shakopee area • Employees and vendors spend at least 225 hotel nights per year at Shakopee hotels ��► • United Health Care Children's Charity • Shutterfly donates over$100,000 per year to the local charity p• • 14 14% rig ion_ • JLL �,; • SHUTTERFLY � Our Request • Shutterfly would like to request the one year extension offered in Section 3.10(b) of the Development Agreement to achieve the job requirements. • Shutterfly would like to receive its full grant for 2016. (b) Job and Wage Goal& Within two years after the date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion of the Minimum Improvements (the "Compliance Date"), the Developer shall cause to be created at least 258 new MI time equivalent jobs on the Development Property and shall cause the wages for all employees on the Development Property to be no less than an average of$18.78 per hour, exclusive of benefits (based on Gross Salary). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, if the .^. wage and job goals described in this paragraph arc met by the Compliance Date,those goals are deemed satisfied despite the Developer's continuing obligations under Sections 3.10(a)(6)and 3.10(d). The City, Of; 141111110 the Authority, and the County may, after public hearings held by the respective governing body and approval by beth bodies, extend the Compliance Date by up to one year, provided that nothing in this section will be construed to limit the City's, the Authority's, or the County's legislative discretion regarding this matter. SHUTTERFLY ® ,.. )) JLL Page 1 of 1 8/12/2016 8:45:34 AM Page 1 of 2 Date - Batch (Julian) Doc # Project Obj Acct # Description Vend # Total Amount 1.799,537.26 51.43890,000.00720.00126.0067.57847.0024.88 Ck Date GL Date Check TotalCheck TotalCheck TotalCheck TotalCheck TotalCheck TotalCheck TotalCheck TotalCheck Total Check # Page 2 of 2 Date - Batch (Julian) Doc # Project Obj Acct # Description GRAND TOTAL Vend # Total Amount 455.89 901,831.82 Ck Date GL Date Check Total Check # Ab"rst "'{ •;.,"'"- Y ff �i Yd"Se 1. W- \ `EIaNS rt.7- ''= C00 1 c � Le .a Nit 1 9' 4 x S.fxg rf s•rxv !ter �., �' , a _ .. s�. iww �iw{ y,;:,-. t�.•3M .< ? '^ 4:11-3...4"., kms .a„- -AMMO' O L*M u '- 4 , '' "° +fir+mo/1liM vf �t * ` '^S T',e. . ''. fv e• ty: .ry iC4{GBPS .` IT, za 1cv. .�i Ail ` -- s $•sLs #'aFP t`x ra i ". .,_ Si___ _ r i' i " -p,: 50 ate %x - " �-: .a maw ,r �r `tit �Rt 7. ..::'4,,,,,,,F..--_,,,:,,,xis�' i "xz:,.;;r..fit ztF cv ri- rrt}; if, �; .ren � � ''1.4 Yl.*1 'r3c a§' �.' c ", --3 rte 4141 7°.°4 4.- Ilk u a 1 itv opir .. . . ... ,r,,,,,,re,v4:::,,„,..,.„,4..;.. ....,,.;:,,,„1„.41.:.,m„,,z,}.4,;.. LI x Lu 0 0( t < ., . by ,,,$ r1 CCSa o *Oil o B := c 7 o o 15 ca (t N 5 N as a) >- s o `o c0 a) Q o E :•- = cc ca o ca = N N 0 > N •> N - w LE as cr 0- N as a.) O 0 U) > CO > 0 0 1- C > o_Q O `~' c CSS E L 0 _o 0 i 0 CO -.-..= o -1- ca4 r • ~ oW o �� y > Q) o O •0 c E 17'5 O No co 1E X X 0 U N p c ca >+ a- u) , p s"* lr T� 0 0 -� C� Liu C * • -. '111 a - a EN - Co of CC7 = E = CoN m a) a - 01 0) 0 o .� Q c U «- 3lk yyy E c co Q > o E " Oco ( i ; fl •OV LL CY W U q S to 01 o jm4 IEi O 0 0 .- O J O `d's — -c E!3 CD V O O E 0 EO O CO O CCTIP -0 O 0 Cts -1-• O O O U CCS Q O O - C E C Q ra 1-- co J p Q CO al E 4) c Q O L N E 3 ��.-� O CLS >•' -- as CD Cr ia CO fi ccN CAU Ca aa .o i - .c J• as u) a)• Q . ' 147 c O r^ co W O tf cz s- 4 �T C c� - C'7 F.I.. Ef} E O) � C i r 1 c : - O (ll . 7:3 ix A d -..t 4 I ._.. z Z O m ani /I�L/ (Is aai CC U CC W ... 1-- . 1, 1• 1, 1 F—. 4' _ CO 11414111 > 0 0 ___co cei = z.1_:s6> G va % m R 2 C y CCi. k CO e o CC) £ 7 = o 0 \ cC § / : 0 E > 3 : _ 0_ n c -0 M a o q : o to y Q C k / £ 0_ @ ± 0 _ ( / / co . Q >, a >, > , y = ZE (1.) t ± - ± 7 2@ f s o a = 5 c \4 k ? ? k / \ � . vl o� � ; 4\ o_ . / � £ c CO k ? CD k { / 1_74 E \ \ E n Cl) o e «?« e q 0 G 1 = £ m m = 4l ; Cr G 2 t. 2 = 2 / \ a = 9 ® � � « » ƒ o . d. , >- O x p Li ƒ \ > < , / . w . .. W .� fy . I- U } D 0 S 0 immil 014 6 o� Li...., ,...z o e ti CD . •ti71 /21 o0 00 0, C 0 7t . oo N 0\ — C Ci; ,— O oho � 0- p p� 0 C . ~ N p •— ...l t • �� Li 'l- +( f�. Z , o� E 6g °' C • Z ,..Z V °' ?--IO a4 psw �jtit + '� Q� En U cipC v a) C s O� O C V remAare' � � x 0 O c ( 1O Oto ,— O• 0' %n O i.- O �� � oZ d O L U ' a � Cw (i, c A_) UUd ddd d d '° LL ti off.) O F- .1 en AC O C- `n! r 0a enN Os O v'1 so r41 v1. r r. '0 i1 r+1. n �7', 'I. 'ri 'el 'ri. 'r7, 0 �. '7, e'7. r Y, 'n, M ` 0, *et +.0 r- r- O, vi r- Ci 0 ni en 11 �p'i . IllJ V Cry. sl'. •4 N Al. ,n Y_. +f + 1 b r rb r N O immlr'� n �g f'4 44' M ..p7 M Q g O M K 4" T Q 1p n /+� P r^7 is, O O Y.� 1? `Q G OrC -t r1, -1. o `p W ,rn / n re!,.,11 09 M en .el0 Oi r-i .-.` M �! .y O r N r, r-.' C-- M M M M 00 Q ..r • S? "I M •r r- M Y-- 00 •-, I n, N G Cic. r .—i ."7', N Q '00 en r- .-. en r. `f �0 re-. rt CS p y y rI. y r`.. *el. en •S r, en Y7 0 Ar, .? G„ O ! of ; 7 M M r~ M M ed Ci .., M M ..pp n ." en 00 p n n c0 O. M O r 4 r M r as tl r-- M •O m m O r AA r 00 P, n A n ' n •' a1 t- A n ri. .-, 0. M M �O n po Ci C- O Y- M p N r^ rv. v� c ON CJ •O AA y K •U "pt b 0-1 .+ .- v-1, dJ 'i �A' .+ r� r-. S'. tom- 00 ,M�1 , Z., AO 00 One ewe a e? 4 4 r M M r g r M H C b Q0 ��, r..i e m O r r en en ti rM'!, M IC:-.4 R.Y-. m oq_ ,C7 41 8, '4,. 801` -Mr .0 •1.O .•i ca., R en,, en en ! r" ^, rt b T ,p' N r en en .-i a r M -1 r� m y- 0d T v. de ea I� T of r- r. 4r"J`) 00 M r r C5 r -.. r Y- N a\ M O p A�q- M r- M O. O, n r. .M.. .M-, O n .na •O Yi •O' r, M •7 00 R 00 c=r 1pp r'1. O c,- .0-1. Y'. '�1. "q-f. C;. `.', r"1, rn n ea .t r.� 6d 00 . r-ry T .f r M M Q. r M .�... M� rM- f_ , ,R; .,'n ev �f re r -• O CI Cl ee O en AA r-. O 0 M en 0 Cl 9 re n 2 O• O eel 00 i M T r- 'i n@ en n� ? O Al n M F i _ _f M 0 rh p°t p Op ".p1�, °Q7 O L "I 9 -r w .n V; O O 00 rA a Cn, "l' N r M M r O r p. 4' r O lr'f' v I 7- Ci n �f O. J O, .At- 8 8 SQ R O 01 00 r O M 01 M it `C> rT O pp O �,Q(' �•pG ,Q `1ry0p M Ol O Q. �. 'rl `.1: 4, O o�p b Yom- Q `? ^t WT rte- OCO 1� G R C� r M en •G ,-i N y r� en 4 4,-; CA ee r- '�4 Ci r r^ O { it! too � , 25 S r.� r.1 O, 4. 8 r.1. r'1. c, "'1, r.1 e� r" 74 a. n O G r- r M e M r~ M M r M CO Mr M % 0 N �, G eMe ee R 00 b 0. +'7 00 ry % 6 `O r� ', • 7941 CJ O ' J !? Yi .-. • !� ,Z3O O en4 yMYC �f r" T a• r Ft $ g haOC' C .i M M rT Np M* 00 00 � 0 NO ren ...), 4 e0 O .. "pfiMAf r Mw n m rm w oo U Cd M `G Pl .rlq ". .�„ M M r.h t $ fl i c-i r. lav* g c «r •.. M en 4.v r '0 r3 . z Ha c ln en �' SO r O Z -. J a. I V � �411 w o w C ,... ..5 g I— Ono d t. ti a p. ,., m u t1, fs. v a '• u cA. , /'� H 'O t,xO .� ¢C ..1 :I U .Y. '�+ 4 .ui, vyi W N �` i''' a c'"a tit° w 0 0 f a -00 1 .p 03 4. a 5 F, c L'„' « Q p ; 0 a, o r a u' (-a s��i m 0 4'F+ co .S e3'iUti) 44 . < eX .3X. zznrii W r1 eX' U vI inimi 010114 Pin -0 q a '°^ O s ❑ = s-. i O O ° ' u C -0 > O,, a > a .fes i1i cy a) cJo o > - 0 a 0 0 °a° = 3 '� 'b O _a .. i v 5. 0 Y „, ., 0 u. a ''4 �.:: 1Ii } i. 'Cii ,4 ,L ,LN 0,1 O U.- CL)UAOC -y a, E" U = — U >N 0 i. .a OD c� O • - 2 O O c �L a c3 -� a O .EH U O y ' vi > 'b z 0 P��f�"^��gll ❑b•O s.' y Y U - ..U. y 'C S3' a) ..... '`~' 7 �. ;�' CSC 0 aE N raj S.. N c3 ',= O ?y J d [� G .O O O •'7 U '0 O Y 'O N _0 N N ci4 J Utom`. L y it ..moi v� cxG �i v.' '� ,O. U :-� bA O0 3 U a O 6,, Cr .5 L N — �+ N E O U 7A O 'd Li. � :1' `n N t L3 tiz p O O w U W CL .G �, cu Q. a � CSC a. ' U In cC - .. 04 a) 'o Cu a� :Es -o L .� ', - I a 0 aa) E N y b G >, 0▪ G A —© T : >, :3 = � o `" -o = F c s>. ci E c7_ F x. a� a`) cu °3 i ti ,may ,_, m U iZ 03 .0 �.,c3▪ A 45 = T.5 0 " °' • •—• F E x cl C/) 4 UV) a '"' v) win o-4 vrd w • 0 T1 0 E .4 C..) o W E-, O a5 • • • • • • O ~ (f) I ii 5 Sun , V 6 6 c U cl v - ...J •ccl cC i 11 U a 0 N cn :, O 9 N U O [ it ct cu cu b U ct N O v0i . ' ,� T 4 't• v 0 > L •,..N Cd cp ce liD o bq E • Ux 0 U d ^' U C0 U- 0 0;, v� 0 "q $,^ cn O cd '0 N (1 N `.5 Tt .ri w 'i U CI. O r . p a p vi ?ill p0 y p 1, j ; CD . O o -0 L' co •v v v o ..0 A J) W 6. �, a o .��, � U ..t tCY1.{O UO il vNIi co ca _ Ua iel ina. 1� a H .4 o -°o o Q r hl ��. ik .c N U +��. E di w +r�i 0 U ��+ 1 '1^,'. J U 0 c3 • r-1 T •— ❑ .,. .S7 � N y� w r C1 O . c� atailc.) W x cn N .0 N 00" 'O • 0 0 J E cn Ct E • • • • w F LO immol 2 a ate° � L � " �� O0 t- °' � cn ' 3b a n ^ " 4 'cu N 0 -- x4c _ o cip _ � 8GS a N ~ S-1 ;- 0 a.., 4 r� 0 C c� �" as o ° `o D 0 O o ° - 2 Rw .° Gr-i cid E .7 'C 'a 2 P _a g '° > o O ..+ V G u c ^a O A �"' A v O r,,C G LP �.7 _af 01, Lir - 0 t C .� o Vii, g_�5 8 r y 1. bA ya U a.o _, 0.r >,a it" .. < C . _,- = R � , lQQ t-,,a Yu n � 'O O ot J N o LL C./) cn vD 6,,,,1 W I 1— O as , , ��. I U)