Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/19/2000 ADJ. REGULAR SESSION Ri I'm • �� • LOCATION: 129 Holmes Street South SEPTEMBER 19, 2000 Mayor Jon Brekke presiding 11 Roll Call at 7:00 p.m. 2] Pledge of Allegiance 3] Approval of Agenda 4] Mayor's Report 51 Approval of Consent Business — (All items noted by an * are anticipated to be routine. After a discussion by the Mayor, there will be an opportunity for members of the City Council to remove items from the consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items removed will be considered in their normal sequence on the agenda. Those items remaining on the consent agenda will otherwise not be individually discussed and will be enacted in one motion.) 6] RECOGNITION BY CITY COUNCIL OF INTERESTED CITIZENS — (Limited to five minutes per person/subject. Longer presentations must be scheduled through the City Clerk. As this meeting is cablecast, speakers must approach the microphone at the podium for the benefit of viewers and other attendees.) * 71 Approval of Minutes: July 18, 2000 * 8] Approval of Bills in the Amount of $471,167.18 plus $183,218.12 for refunds, returns and pass through for a total of $654,385.30 91 Public hearing on proposed vacation of Research Boulevard East of CR -83 — Res. No. 5414 101 Communications 11] Liaison Reports from Council Members 121 Recess for Economic Development Authority Meeting - None 131 Re- convene 141 Recommendations from Boards and Commissions A] Tree Preservation Ordinance uinofpV [8I ssouisng Iagl® [L I suraouoo lrounoo [9I TaaRS joouadS put, anuoAV ,OI Ie lualuma ioj isonbag (Isar Sti) Isoni,j •Z 9IJ7S 'ON 'SOX — VOOOZ sauaS `spuog Iuauraeordutj uo p iouaD 000`09S`Z$ jo aItS $utpr * I :uoilellstuiuzpv lvrauao [3 iaxlo , aoUEUQjU!VW jo �UUH },* 20 ssar — uoiltgordjo uoilalduioa •£* gnrlspuau3 assay — uorltgord jo uorlolduzoD •Z 03 MV'I XUrj — uoillagord3o uoilaldtuoD -1 Iauuosrad [ TIQU r0000S .ioi suoil�OutoodS put, uvId IalstW sired agpugrllnoS I uORP 1.109g pine sired [Q fjradord snldinS 'I* a.n3 pine oo!Iod [D S I bS ' ®N 'sag — Iuauru&leag 91 Puy UogorulsuOOag £g g� IOJ Ilodag kliligis of rapl® '£ uoiliPP�pv ' �9 imd XOIIeA `V Iolln® Ioj uoilorulsuoo puod prenAV •Z gUrsrn0101.13MOS frelrueS rod salono azuoglnV 'I uuaaui u pue siro� Oilgnd [ iannaS P!AtCl — uol u PgnS IOuTW IOJ Vualuo jo IanreM roj Isonbag •Z sguissolo oado3pgS Ioj WfjV pasinag v alnqulsi(I 01 uOilRzuorllnv roj isonbag •I luaus olanaQ Irunuzuro� [ ssauisng IElauarJ [S I Z a.!?Led OOOZ `6I IN'LualdoS VQNaDv am Lvi NaL OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS 1 THE COUNCIL ADJ. REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA IIP The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. with Councilmembers Morke, Link, Amundson, Sweeney and Mayor Brekke present. Also present: Gregg Voxland, Acting City Administrator; Bruce Loney, Public Works Director; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director; Jim Thomson, City Attorney and Tracy Coenen, Management Assistant. The pledge of allegiance was recited. The following items were added to the agenda. 151.7. VFW. Post # 4046 Gambling License approval. 17. A. Memo from the Met Council on Urban Design Opportunities. 17.B. Executive Session to discuss litigation. Sweeney/Link moved to approve the agenda as modified. Motion carried unanimously. The following items were added to the Consent Agenda. 10. Renae Backert requests for exemption from the 24 -hour parking restrictions. 15.E-5. Refinancing of Health Care Bonds for St. Gertrude's Health Center. 15.F.7. VFW Post #4046 Gambling License. 15.A.1. Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval for Stonebrooke. 15.E-4. Application for Temporary Liquor License for Murphy's Landing. Sweeney/Morke moved to approve the Consent Agenda as modified. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Brekke asked if there were any citizens present in the audience who wished to address any item not on the agenda. There was no response. Morke /Sweeney moved to approve the minutes of June 6, 2000 and June 13, 2000. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke moved to approve the bills in the amount of $1,644,986.87. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Mayor Brekke opened the public hearing on the proposed trunk watermain extension from Southbridge Parkway to Stagecoach Road, Project No. 2000 -5. Bruce Loney, Public Works Director, approached the podium and reported on the proposed trunk watermain extension on the east side of Shakopee from Southbridge Parkway to Stagecoach Road, Project No. 2000 -5, Resolution No. 5387. He stated that on October 19, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5245, which ordered the preparation of a feasibility report for the extension of the watermain from Southbridge Parkway to Stagecoach Road. On July 5, 2000, the feasibility reported was submitted to the City Council. At that meeting Resolution No. 5376 Official Proceedings of the July 18, 2000 Shakopee City Council page 2 was adopted calling for a public hearing to be held on July 18, 2000, and receiving the feasibility report. Bruce Loney presented two alternatives for the truck watermain extension from Southbridge Parkway to Stagecoach Road. It is essential that the loop petitioned for is constructed. This is to serve the Southbridge development as another water source and is needed for fire protection. Alignment # 1 would connect to an existing watermain at Southbridge, cross County Road 18,and extend east and north through the Shakopee Crossings property along a future roadway. The extension would continue east to Stagecoach Road, then north to an existing watermain located just south of the existing railroad tracks. The second alignment would connect to the existing watermain at Southbridge, extend to Stagecoach Road along the NSP easement, adjacent to the existing power lines, cross Stagecoach Road and continue northerly along the east side of the road until it connects to the existing watermain located south of the existing Union Pacific railroad tracks. The Shakopee Public Utility Commission discussed this issue at their July 10, 2000, meeting and recommended the alignment no. 1 as their preference. The City of Shakopee concurred with Shakopee Public Utilities in recommending alignment no. 1. This alignment offers the least risk of assessment appeals. According to Shakopee Public Utilities alignment no. 2 is not preferred but it is not unacceptable. Steve Soltau, who represents the petitioner, Shakopee Crossing Inc. has indicated that the company he represents prefers alignment no. 2. In the assessments are some costs for oversizing some of the mains. The assessments would be divided approximately $430,000 to Shakopee Crossings, $34,000 to the Tierney Contracting Co. and $36,00 to Shakopee Public Utilities. There are other properties involved that prefer the second alignment. Joe Adams, Administrative Assistant for Shakopee Public Utilities was present at the meeting also. Mr. Loney was in possession of a letter from Northwest Asphalt, Inc. in which they expressed their concerns regarding the sewer and water in the Stagecoach Road area, which is out of MUSA. Alternative No. 2 impacts the City considerably and Shakopee Public Utilities only slightly and there is a high assessment appeal risk. Mr. Loney felt that this was a policy decision that the Council would be making this evening. Cncl. Morke felt alternative No. 2 would provide better fire protection and would serve many outside the MUSA area. Cncl. Link felt alternative no. 2 was more logical than alternative no. 1. It was thought that the City would like to eliminate the wells for health reasons. Mayor Brekke asked if it was legal to connect to City Water if MUSA was not in. They also wondered if the assessments were practical without sewer being put in at the same time. Mr. Loney said it was better to do a combination project but the purpose of the project is to put in the water main for Shakopee Public Utilities. Mike Pfeiffer, Northwest Asphalt, Inc. approached the podium and said if they get the water line, they want the sewer line at the same time. Mr. Leek approached the podium and gave a slight history of MUSA. He had a 1995 Land Use Plan with him, which had been approved by the Met Council. MUSA controls where Sanitary sewer goes in, in the County Metro area. MUSA was on the north side of Hwy 169. In 1993 land on the west side was traded for MUSA in the east so the Chaska Intercepter could be constructed. The land in the eastern area actually was put in a moratorium area by the Met Council with no end date on the moratorium. Stagecoach Road is on the west side and is in the Official Proceedings of the July 18, 2000 Shakopee City Council Page 3 non -MUSA area at this time. That area is still in the MUSA moratorium area designated by the Met Council. Mr. Pfeiffer said he and his neighbors were strongly opposed to just water. The issue of MUSA was deferred for a future meeting topic. Bill Cherne, property owner of Superior Supply Co., approached the podium and said water was of no benefit to them without the sewer. They did want to develop their land but without MUSA it was not possible. Mayor Brekke said it was very costly to get the sewer and water to the point it is at now. The sewer and water out in Southbridge was basically paid for by the developer. R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director, said this MUSA issue might merit some study. Usually MUSA is an accommodation to a new development. Mayor Brekke said the purpose of the meeting this evening was the looping of the water system for fire protection in the Southbridge area. Mayor Brekke asked for more public discussion on the water system alternatives. There was none. Mayor Brekke declared the public hearing closed. Morke /Amundson offered Resolution No. 5387, A Resolution Ordering An Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for a Trunk Watermain Extension, From Southbridge Parkway to Stagecoach Road — Project No. 2000 -5, alternative No. 1 Westerly alignment, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Amundson/Link moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute a consultant extension agreement, with WSB & Associates, Inc. for surveying services to complete the plans and specifications for the improvements for Project No. 2000 -5. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Morke moved to grant an exemption from Section 9.04 of the City Code, which prohibits the parking of a recreational vehicle on or within the limits of any street right of way for more than 24 consecutive hours, as provided in Section 9.08 (Subd. 1 of the City Code), from April I' through October 15 of each year, until no longer needed to Renae Bockert, 1187 Madison Street, Shakopee, Mn. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Cncl. Amundson reported on Vision Shakopee and their web site and Cncl. Sweeney reported on Shakopee Public Utilities. There was a recess at 7:37 p.m. for the purpose of conducting the Economic Development Authority meeting. Official Proceedings of the Shakopee City Council The meeting reconvened at 7:39 p.m. July 18, 2000 Page 4 Tracy Coenen, Management Assistant updated the Council on what the Library Study Committee has been doing over the last two months. She reported that the Committee has reviewed Jack Anderson's facility report on the needs and assessments of the library now and what will be needed over the next 30 to 40 years. Approximately $3.1 - $3.3 million will be needed. The Committee toured other library facilities. Last night at their meeting the Committee voted unanimously to move for a motion and a recommendation to City Council for a down town library location. If the City Council is in agreement with a down town location, the Committee is planning on working with City staff to identify down town locations, doing feasibility studies, and pros and cons on the different locations. The Committee would also like to know from City Council how much of the $3.9 million in the building fund would be allotted for a new library. This will help them determine their assessments and needs. Direction is needed from Council if the down town location is accepted, a monitary amount, if a referendum may be needed or other funding methods as well. Discussion followed. Cncl. Sweeney felt that it was premature to make a decision on a location because staff has been asked to look at alternatives for sites for a number of city facilities. Cncl. Link felt that when a committee is appointed and makes a recommendation to City Council that Council should take their advise. He has no problem with a down town site. Cncl. Morke agreed with Cncl. Sweeney that it was premature to make a decision at this time. Cncl. Amundson liked the idea of the library down town, but would also like city hall to remain down town and would not like the two to be in competition for the same site. Mayor Brekke felt that an over all plan is needed for City facilities and that the library needs to be part of it. He liked the idea of having the library in the down town area. Discussion was held on whether a referendum for a library should be held this fall and whether or not there would be sufficient information available on the library for the voters to consider a referendum. Chair DuBois stated that there are many people who are willing to work for a November referendum. Mayor Brekke stated that all City facilities need to be part'of an overall plan for how the City is going to proceed on City facilities and staff needs to come back with a time line and a plan for how we are going to develop that plan. He stated that, if the Council would like, he would like to work with the City Administrator on developing a plan for discussion. Cncl. Morke stated that it his preference that it be handled at the staff level. Sweeney/Morke moved to accept the Library Study Committee report. Official Proceedings of the July 18, 2000 Shakopee City Council Page 5 Cncl. Amundson stated that she would like information on what the different brakes are in terms of referendum dollars and the impacts on the houses. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Morke moved to extend the approval period of the preliminary plat for Stonebrooke by an additional 12 months. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke offered Ordinance No. 571, Fourth Series, An Ordinance of the City Of Shakopee, Minnesota, Amending Chapter 4, Building Regulations, Regarding Fences, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke moved to approve Ordinance No. 572, Forth Series, an Ordinance Amending City Code By Allowing Wireless Telecommunication Antennas As A Permitted Accessory Use In The Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into a cooperative agreement with Scott County for the pedestrian traffic control signal on C.R. 17 by the Shakopee Junior High School. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into an agreement with I.S.D. 4720 for reimbursement of costs to the City by the School District for the pedestrian traffic control signal on CR 17 by the Shakopee Junior High School. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke offered Resolution No. 5388, A Resolution Of The Shakopee City Council Authorizing Execution Of An Agreement For The Project Entitled Safe and Sober, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Mark McQuillan, Natural Resources Director, approached the podium and reported on the Hiawatha Park Shelter project. Mayor Brekke said he would like to see the City more aggressive with playground equipment and provide better quality equipment. He would advocate replacing the playground equipment. The CIP has a budget item in it for $40,000 for Holmes Park. Mark McQuillan was ready to suggest before the Mayor brought up the playground equipment issue, that he withdraw the recommendation regarding the playground equipment and include the playground equipment in the project with Holmes Park. Morke/Link offered Resolution No. 5389, A Resolution Accepting Bids on the Hiawatha Park Shelter Project and awarding the project to the lowest bidder Menke Wood Products, and moved its adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Link/Sweeney moved to waive permit fees except for SAC and WAC charges, for the Hiawatha Park Shelter. Motion carried unanimously. Official Proceedings of the July 18, 2000 Shakopee City Council Page 6 Sweeney/Morke moved to approve the replacement of compressor Al in the ice aeana system at a cost of $5,381.92 by Rink Tech International with the funding to come from the Recreation Fund. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke moved to authorize the hiring of Kelly Schmitt and Kristen Romeo as Receptionists at Step 1, Grade AA of the 2000 Pay Plan, effective July 24, 2000, contingent upon successful pre - employment physical and background and credit checks. Ms. Romeo and Schmitt will move to Step 2 upon successful completion of the 6 -month probationary period. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke moved to extend the probation of Jason Bullard, Assistant Finance Director, to January 31, 2001. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke moved to approve the job description for an Engineering Technician H position (CC# 294). (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to advertise and hire for the Engineering Tech II position, as per the City's Personnel handbook, Section VIII. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke offered Resolution No. 5390, A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 5278, which adopted the 2000 Pay Schedule for the Officers and Non -Union Employees of the City of Shakopee, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke moved to authorize the promotion of Layne Otteson to Engineering Technician III, Step 1, Grade G effective July 17, 2000. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke moved to authorize the hiring of Daniel Schumacher as the Ice Arena Maintenance Operator (contingent on successful completion of the pre - employment physical and background check ) at a starting salary of $14,24644/yr, Step 1, Grade D of the 2000 Pay Plan, with an increase to Step 2 following successful completion of the six -month probationary period. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Ms. Cox, City Clerk, reported on Pablo's Mexican Restaurant's request for land consideration. The City Council is asked to consider three requests this evening. 1. removing a reversionary clause and 2. authorize a deed conveying property to Mr. Schwaesdall and 3. to consider the expansion of the on -sale liquor license to an outside area. Because the recording of the deed never took place this can be done very simply by creating a new deed and removing the reversionary clause. Originally this land was to be used for landscaping purposes only but now Mr. Schwaesdall would like to have outside dining and drinking in the area. Some of the landscaping will remain. Dan Hughes, Police Chief sees no reason why the expansion of the liquor license request should be denied. The three issues before the Council this evening are 1. whether or not to remove a reversionary clause from Mr. Schwaedalls deed, 2. directing staff to publish the required notice to amend a liquor license and 3. should a nominal fee be charged for Official Proceedings of the July 18, 2000 Shakopee City Council Page 7 the land purchase or should City staff negotiate for a close to fair market value for the sale of land to Mr. Schwaedall. Also Mr. Schwaedall would need to apply for a CUP for a class II restaurant. Mr. Schwaesdall owner of Pablo's Mexican restaurant approached the podium. He said his business is very successful and he is trying to create an atmosphere on this end of town. Cncl. Sweeney felt this land was to be used for landscaping purposes only. Mayor Brekke said this would facilitate the investment in the downtown area. However, the property should be sold at a reasonable market value. This would be an expansion of the dining and drinking area. According to Mr Schwaesdall the parking lot at Pablo's will not change and the dining and drinking would be within a four foot wall enclosure. Cncl. Sweeney was uncomfortable that Mr. Schwaesdall never had the original deed recorded. Mr. Schwaesdall said he just never took the time to have the deed recorded. Mayor Brekke asked Mr. Thomson how the City could accomplish selling the property to Mr. Schwaedall at a close to market value. Mr. Jim Thomson, City Attorney said the removal of the reversionary clause and the execution of a deed conveying property to Mr. Schwaesdall could be done in one motion. Ms. Cox recommended tabling the request to amend the liquor license for Pablo's for four weeks and staff will publish the notice regarding amending the liquor license for Pablo's and hopefully a recommendation for the sale of the land to Pablo's could be available at that time. Amundson/Link moved to direct staff to negotiate with Mr. Schwaedall on the sale of the property that the City owns and Mr. Schwaedall needs. Motion carried 4 —1 with Cncl. Sweeney dissenting. Amundson/Morke moved to table the request for amending the liquor license for Pablo's Mexican Restaurant and removing the reversionary clause from the deed for additional land for Pabalo's Mexican Restaurant. Motion carried unanimously. Sweeney/Morke moved to approve the applications and grant On Sale Wine and On Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses to the Restaurant Company, dba Perkins Restaurant and Bakery, 1205 East I' Avenue, continent upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a Class II Restaurant. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke moved to authorize the acceptance of $500.00 from the Lions Club and authorize the funds to be placed in the Escrow Fund for use in Lions Park. (Motion carried under Official Proceedings of the Shakopee City Council the Consent Agenda.) July 18, 2000 Page 8 Sweeney/Morke moved to approve the application and grant a temporary on -sale liquor license to Minnesota Valley Restoration Project, Inc. dba Historic Murphy's Landing, 2187 East Highway 101, for July 21, 2000, conditioned upon compliance with insurance requirements. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke offered Resolution No. 5391 calling For A Public Hearing And Giving Preliminary Approval To The Proposed Issuance Of Revenue Bonds Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.152 Through 469.165, and moved its adoption, for a refinancing of Health Care Bonds for St. Gertrudes Health Center. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke moved to authorize the sale of Lot 10 and the adjacent vacated', alley, of Block 36, City of Shakopee, in accordance with MSA 282.01. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Sweeney/Morke offered Resolution No. 5392, A Resolution Of The City Of Shakopee, Minnesota, Approving Premise Permit For The V.F.W. Post # 4046 and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda.) Mayor Brekke felt the City should be involved in the Metro Council urban design opportunities. The City needs a catalyst to get the planning of a development going in this creative way. R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director, reported on the Memo from the Met Council regarding Smart Growth concepts. The Met Council asked Calthrope to do a study regarding the Smart Growth concepts in the Highway 36 corridor. They were so pleased with the results that they continued this Smart Growth concept. This is a two -step process. The first step is quite short and requires identifying the sites for a possible Smart Growth development. The second step is more time consuming and at this point it would be reviewed by the Met Council. The deadline for site applications for the Smart Growth opportunity is August 15, 2000, at 5:00 p.m. Mayor Brekke sees this as an extension of some of the discussions that took place during the moratorium regarding developments. He encouraged a stop at one of these Smart Growth communities to see what they are like. R. Michael Leek suggested that possible Smart Growth sites be identified and what staff might see as potentials identified and have staff bring these options back before the Council before site locations in Shakopee are submitted for the Smart Growth program. Sweeney /Amundson moved to direct the appropriate staff to make application for an urban design site that can demonstrate Smart Growth principles and to bring these options back to the City Council. There was slight discussion on the amount of staff time involved in preparing the application and Official Proceedings of the July 18, 2000 Shakopee City Council Page 9 possible future Smart Growth requirements. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Thomsen requested that the Council Chambers be cleared for a closed session regarding the special assessments appeal filed by Eagle Creek Townhomes and appealed to the court of appeals along with the pending lawsuit filed by Evergreen Real Estate Development Corp. There was a recess at 8:38 p.m. for an executive session to discuss the pending litigation as outlined by Mr. Jim Thomson. The meeting was re- convened at 8:53 p.m. Mayor Brekke adjourned the meeting at 8:53 p.m. d S. Cox City Clerk Carole Hedlund Recording Secretary CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance director RE: City Bill List DATE: September 14, 2000 CON��tiT Introduction and Background Attached is a print out showing the division budget status for 2000 based on data entered as of 9/14/2000. Also attached is a regular council bill list for invoices processed to date for council approval. Included in the checklist but under the control of the EDA are checks for the EDA General Fund (code 0191) in the amount of $39.44. Not included in the attached bill list but included in the total amount of bills shown on the agenda is the below listed subsistence /travel reimbursement for an employee. The employee(s) were away from their normal work site for a business purpose but the meal itself was not a "business purpose meal '° or there was no receipt /odometer readings and therefore needs to be paid through payroll as taxable income. Linda Jansen $8.29 Also included in the checklist are various refunds, returns, pass through, etc. totaling $183,328.12. The actual net expense amount is $471,167.18. Action Requested Move to approve the bills in the amount of $654,495.30'. CITY OF SHAKOPEE EXPENSES BY DEPARTMENT 09/14/00 Ws CURRENT YEAR ANNUAL MONTH TO DEPT DEPT NAME BUDGET PERCENT ACTUAL DATE EXPENDED 11 MAYOR & COUNCIL 80,130 12 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 72 49,714 62 13 CITY CLERK 249,600 2,799 183,981 74 15 FINANCE 219,290 1,709 115,075 52 16 LEGAL COUNSEL 429,990 3,667 292,887 68 17 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 298,500 -2,499 225,756 76 18 GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 574,780 - 33,058 383,916 67 31 POLICE 253,840 5,830 156,374 62 32 FIRE 2,173,740 7,627 1,317,095 61 33 INSPECTION - BLDG- PLMBG -HTG 705,840 19,674 465,690 66 41 ENGINEERING 428,070 4,118 315,326 74 42 STREET MAINTENANCE 541,650 41,349 383,070 71 44 SHOP 904,850 8,879 494,774 55 46 PARK MAINTENANCE 156,240 966 94,656 61 91 UNALLOCATED 535,430 12,519 360,398 67 557,010 -951 '. 570,205 102 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 8,108,960 72,700 5,408,915 67 17 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 509,990 0 1 174,861 34 TOTAL TRANSIT 509,990 0 174,861 34 19 EDA 247,380 39 114,670 46 TOTAL EDA 247,380 39 114,670 46 Ws � I a� I rn I M a I I ' 04 H a a4 C)4 X31 a aa< , al al a a a a, aaa �' H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H w. ° 0 a a �E: 1 o z , N zl a , W 01 z1O 000 000000000000 1 10 ° ° 0 0oco00000000000 w 1 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H U I N o ° O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H I O, N N d' d' N O1 O H N M d Ln to D I H LO LO . . mmw Z l a F i r e + HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH M M M M co (`') MM H 1 W 0 a O,rn M 0 a s aaa a a a aa,aaaaaa �10 w w w kD ICn A W o° o p WWWWWWWWWWWWWWW 0 0 0 0 0 000 �C vi rr H FC cnrnulv�u�v�rnmcn�nmulm�nvi 0 0 0 0 o coo H U)O O ri NNNNNNNNNNNNN ID ko r- N N O O 01H r-I El I oD ° oo oo (Y) H 0 M M M M M M M M M MM M M ID ID O N M ,-A N co NN 'T. I H ri ri Mh d' H HHHHHHHHriHHHHriH d� N d' N M HMM M 0 W 1 N W N d M d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d N N d d d d N V d O (�] U I N Ul N H Ul LO c o NN H N I HH UtD I H N H r-IH N N N M UI t` co m H M H N d' N UI H H O N N N 141 ri N Ul FCZ I rn co rn mot` co co HHH r-i H H (f) M lq4 d d \D r m m o of m co r- O M � o rn o 001 rn rn 000000000000000 rn m rn rn o 000 , , to 1 � I H 12 Ul U W 01 w � z co H i rx] a W Cl) m W w x a i z Fl rC i� z a Q a FC x x a H, N U FC W W W .'7 Q5 W a I x c7 U U' W u l w a s U w w C,co x m ,� U Q i H H SI p U W W o a o H AAAAAAAAA AAAA> A W W Z xzz a CX4 Hco HHHHHHHHE-+HHHHr < H W U00 rx, rs, v1 H wo a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 0 H u zxx W 0404 H W co WWWWWWWWWWWWWWW w O U 04 H C o w < 9w w wwrX4 wwwwwwwwrX4 www a H a w co aaa 'A U a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a o ° <HH a 1 >> mmrnmcnui�nrnmmw�ncncnvi U a H W co CQ wwwwwwwwwwwwwww a W w l W -l17 A as > > >a > >aaa > > >> co H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H a a a 10 O 00 a HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH U � ��� I O CL, r.G FC FC � FC � FC FC FC FC FC FC H W 114 04 04 04 04 0 4x04 ax04 W p; E- ' >> CQ H HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH H W co o i a H W x W zz a mmcncncncncnmmv2mcnmcnm a O mcn�n W H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H W A zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz h a WWW A I v a s H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H W rn a a a w' UU 16 U L��]� a rz, W WWW �Iz O zz I"I �4 FG �4 �4��4 �4 �1: �4 P4 Ul W A HHH ' W co UU w O r7 ,-a aaaaaaaaaaaa W F] H�� ' A a+ X4 , 14 FC FC FC FC FC FC FC FC PQ 1 H zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz z 3 z A 000 � U O0 a A 0 00000000000000 W � A W 04 W NNN a H 124 A z HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH ,,��yy A HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH E W W p H 04x04 q 9Q Ww O rCrCrC�FCrCrCrCr FCrC�FCFCrC H a 3 a z www x zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz x as 0) H > 1 i< i< is * i * * is 1 oaD 0 W MM � mOI r CCD) 000 OO L-� L- co N M N N 0 L- H 't %D W O 0 O N N O N co O0 co O N m H'A M M 0 UI Ln H H NlO UI UIw d'M Nri H Nl- od'L� 00 00 00 00 MM ll� cp co I I 0)0% L- L— d' 1 O N N 00 0 ID ID 0 0) LO ON d+ H M 00 0 H W d• N W oo L— M UI M M 0 NM HOv 0 0 0 �D ID d\ C` � 0 1 Lo Ul NN ww O Ul Ul / i} yr NN m w r H N L` N m ? wM t/} NN OO Ul Ul MM m I N N r-I H Hvl•H H v)-w l0 to Ul Ln N N v1-vT Ol t? v} i H H d' d• N a U I W I H , U] w , to lD lD to to LD lD lD to to lD to lD �D l0 to lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD tD \D to w w ID H H I o O O 00 0 0 000000 000000000 o O O 0 O 000 w A l 01 m rn rnm rn rn rnmrnrnrnolmmrnmrnmrnrnm m rn rn rn rn 0) a 10 0 0 00 0 0 0 °°0°°00°°0°000 0 0 0 0 0 000 .y. U 1 0 O O 0 0 0 O \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ U W, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -.0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 00°0000°0°000 0 0 0 0 0 0°0 W `� 1 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 O O 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 S U I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U O I a z I Ln lD co m 0 (y H I H H ri r-I H N N M d' U) h co U 1 to A lD A to A w A lD A W A to N N N N N N z U I lD is to -k l0 i� l0 w ik lD -K �D A to A to A w A to A to A to O W i to v lD V lD V to V lD V to V w -x �D is �D i W � to - I.D � lD V w v to v w v to v \D v lD U U I N I 1 � I bl t � I $a4 al _ � I Alaaaa 0 00000000x0 0x0 0 x x H 0000000000 o 0 0 0O o xxx to z I H H H O 000 O O O Ln i 000 1 I J I v � I w I 0 O CQ I O W E I N z I I a � z I w I p H U I p O i w00wm ° HHHHHHHHHH r1 ao� N H MM N Lq U] U] V1 U1 U1 Ul U1 U] V] 00 Lo 10 cr p FJ '� ' '� •� •� ~ J 'a `J 'D [- L� L- � H M r- 00 00 co l� L- L- � M M M 000 0000000 W mw M 00 rn H I 0 0 0 0 O 000 O 00 0 M M M 00 O 00 O In LO LO I H H H H O H H H H H H H H H H 000 O O O O O N 0 0 O coo H I NNN N H N N N N N N N N N N H M H M H H H H N M H 01 H H H 7P: I MMMM cr MMMMMMMMMM N(MN N M M N M 10 MN M MMM 0 W I V d d d d d d 'll W d d V :1 V W d d V W d M 0 r V I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I U I HHLOH MH rl)HHMH NIVH M HN cr H N ri ri 01 U a I Ln In NH 00 Nr LO LO M Ln Ln 00 NN LO U) to N 0 M N LO Ln HN t�f Mr- Ln �z I r- r NM H HHHHM hL�HMH C-hl� M H r M H [- L- l- 1 0 0 0', 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p p 0 O O I O O O 00 O l0 l0 10 co co co I ' z I H ' z I H I W W W < WWW Z 1 u] W V1 H H U > > w > U w a H H H H I HzH R H ^✓�� a w wa O ° www 04 1 ama z a via cnmm U I ca U co H V) � �� \ wlwwww Wwwwwwwwww 07 D z U z z w zzz A I zzzz zzzzzzzzzz zv�z LJ H O OH 0 O W \ Z Ui Z 000 a 0000000000 H\H 00000000x0 HaH H ca aj H w cacAm I aPaaa r� aaaaaa,a aaa rw w w� w www Iwwww H wwwwwwwwww ��a Q w I aaaa z aaaaaaaaaa w<W H O O W O z �W �`' �'�'�' I HE- 4E-1iH HEw- Ew- 1Ew'HEW-IEWIL -+ oE q m a a O a a 0404 U aaa z 000 1 9>D> H IWWWW Iaaaa O z laaaa U H A Iwwww U 1 1 1 1 1 O H z W co I WU2 H >4 >4� q A H 0 O c O t Wwww FC FC z P: U rj HHH Iaaaa wWww P; O I HHH x U q H rx H z A Z zzz _13333 W zzz z W Z 0000 > HHHHHHHHHH �� O w U a U W Q °' I7 I N N N N a Le Is c7!CS- eI.801le1.8c2S 0x .11 z O Ul W � H I H H H H m W W W 000 Ia��� ° HHHHHHHHHH ��� H H O HHH q a u x z ax x a aa ' N FCFCFCFCFCFC�� FCFC a FC W w wW w 000 ���� � I 1 i` i` # # -k # -k is ie I HHMHH NN mm0 r-0hrl - q , d'OH 0IONH 00 r- r- 00 MM MM 00. 1p q0 H I OD 00 H L- r- r- HL- M 00 NM 0IH HH M000N - 00 d' 00 0°0 Z I • . . . MM NN mm MM 00'. 1000 LO 00 000 01HH 1010 HLf100H0M L_NNO 100011p 00 N00 00 0) 0% 01 O i/? MM LO Ln ML�H 00 000 1 L} LO Ln H LO Ln th zh L} i/} L} L} M L} H Ol 10 i/? M M [- l0 l0 L- l- H H H H L- L- L} L} Ln m H M M 01 O O N M l0 l L? L} L} H H L} H i/} t/2- H H 10 l0 M M 0 L} V) H H H <D 1 LO 0 L} I I U I VYV)- WI xl P: U I W I H I H w 1 lfl M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M m C7 1 0 0 0 0 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H \ \ \ H H H H H H w A 1 Ol T 01 Ol O1 Ol dl al O1 dl Q1 O1 dl Ol Ol Ol dl dl 61 dl 01 61 O1 1 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CDC O O O O O p p O1 T m m m Y 1 \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ O 0 00 O 000 U I O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O p \ \ \ ® \\ \ \ \\ U [z� 10 0 0 0 O 0 0° 0 0 0° 0 0 0 000 O O p 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 W x 1 0 0 0 0 O 0 000000000 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 00 O O O O x U 1 N N N ( N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ° ° O 0 0 O 000 U I N N N N N N N N N O I a z I N O1 O H N M d LO 10 L� 0 , N M M M M 00 m U y I lfl n n 1M0 n 10 n 10 n 10 n 10 n M 0 n W n w n ID n ID n l�0 z U I to to 4c to -x to O x to v to v to v to v w v ID v � v w v � v v w v v 1 U U 1 M I � I 1 � I 1 al I � x� x x x xx x x x xxxxxx xxx xxxxx x xx x 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 000000 000 00000 O 00 O O I Q�. I WI o O m 0 a X i 0 Q I N z 1 a I C4 0 i m z I I , � w1 UI H 1 Ln E E E E E E �0 Lo io to l0 t` r O I M (3) co O 0 o to 1.0 Ln ul ul ul ul ul ul N 0 00 co 00 d+ co 07 0) w r o r- co H Lo M ��pgpp d off t�rt`rt� co rr H 1 1 CO ID w o o 0 Ln a0 L7 C7 C7 C7 L7 L7 H H H co o CO 0 00 H 00 o M Q Q Q N N N 0 0 0 0 0 Ln 0 0 0 I '� 0O NNN 00000 N 00 M E Ln H H HH H H H r MMM HHH H olM M Z a+' 1 N N N N N N N N NNNNNN N N N N N N N N N M M N Q w I d' N N d• d+ d' N N d' tM d' d+ d' d' W w N• d' 0 W I I U i H 0 01 1 1 1 I I I I I i 1 1 I I I i I I I I W � NN Cl) d� d' NNWLn HN NLn Ln Nd+N NH N NN N <!'d' r- 00 00 1010 H t�Mw wt— l d IZVw d'M M HH M 0 m O1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 O I I z H I z � H I 1 w z z ca E-4 ul O I a w w w W DQ co Ln \ W H I W W W W a U Q E I a w a a a a a I W H aEEEia EE-HE aaaEE W xH E W a a z z z a z z z a a a z z a U ul z � W U Q HHH,`7 HHH m I ul w a a H co co rCuCFC mcom4x4 cn \ul H w' H E W ulul C7 E �' C7U x£x WlY1 X z 000z 000 zz z zca U Q I Q 3 a H z H w\ z H �E x x E H H H E H H H P� C4 U o ulrCQQQ< q121 FCFC4QQ r- W W x 00 N Exaaax aaa xrxrxaa a w> a cq N P E W N 0) zW HHH W H H H W W W H H W z FC H ' Lo co w o ap�pa pp� aa aapD a Oa; p P OCA[gWO CgWal OOOM9Q O UE OQ I U i z H W U a H U]U? t ul UU a: zzz a w o. (X o 00 UUU UUUUU W `� Q I a H L� H!x H HHH H E z M i w aw a w m EEE Ord �rwd w uu 0 WW x w WWWWWW UUU Ln Ln 0 0 0 Ln Ln In H x UU a 0 0 00 WWW �rt�rt` I4 a x o 000000 aaa PE a E a °a U W W x xxxxxx www 11111 m 1 W w W m ca ul co m z z a: z l�y m U U U 9<< 9< w W W w x a E W ul co ul cam H H H E E E E E 'z, 'z, 1 O H x W x x x x x x H H H H H 00 ' ai WW U U U UUUUUU Uu UUUUU U UU U I 1 1 is L .k 4c C) is is is is -k 41 I 0 OI OI O0 OO OI%D Ln * * is -R MM OO OO Hr mm wm r- 1000 10 N Ln O Ln o N O O 000 00 z E 1 O Ln L11 00 Ln 111 o1 M LM 00 00 00 r-w 01 0� L- 10 to n O H -1W L- HO%D 00 0111 Ln Ln In , .. .. ... HH Ln Ln Ln Ln OIMM 1010 00 1010 H01[O H d1 LnH 00 L- Hr- H1 VOD o1 Ln Ln 000 r- r 1 N N W w d d' H W 0 l0 l0 Ln to a> 01 t/Ti? Ln v} H v} 01 01 H l0 L� W H M 01 d+ N O O of m 00 H H I 1 tD l0 VI 1 :v H t0 [� V)-i/} rM dl M M v? V). L} H M H M �u}H O d dl 01 H H H H i z? i/1 v} v} v} vl- v}ir v} i/1- i/} i/? t/f t/T v} i/} i/l v} i/} v} IH U I yr H ko w HN W vrvr xl a U s W I E I W I M M M M M M M M M M M M C 7 M M M M, M M M M M M M M M H E I H H H w Q m m m rn \ \ \\\\ \\ \ \\ \\\ \\ \ \\ \ i O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 01 01 0l 0 0 0 O 0\ O1 o 01 O O 01 0 of O1 D1 •. �, \ \ 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O" O p \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ U w1 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 000000 000 00000 '0 00 O W x l O O O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 CD 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 x U I N N N N N N N N N N (N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U I O I a z I H N M d• 111 w 0 0) 0 H N M v A A A W A d+ d' Ln L A l0 A 1D l0 k.0 D A l0 A 10 l0 1p LO Ln z U I * l0 -k w is w * k.0 is l0 -k l0 -k l0 i� l0 -K l0 .k A lD A l0 A w A O x 1 v I'D v 10 v w v w v w v w v Lo v �o v v 1 O -K w v * w 41 w* to l0 to v to v U U I w i � I fi 1 � I 1 al 1 Lo Q i0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00000000x0 0 0 Lo �, o 0 0 00 0 0000000000 0 0 n i J I � � I W1 O O CQ I O 13,2 1 a 1 1 Ln U i M H I E N M O I U1 l0 0) r-1 O N H N a0 0 W m O m m m m H lD r Z W r l0 O In m r r 00 M m r r r r I r r H I V In V W 1p O LO Ln 0 o0 Ol O N oo co O oo Ln O O M r d' O oo N l0 O O 11 Lo oo 00000 ti p O i Xi H H H H H o0 M H O O H H O 0 0 0 0 .-1 H H M H H O O I I H O O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O. 0 0 0 0 O O H H H H H H H H H H m M M M H M M M M M (n M M M M m M Zi 0 I N N N N N N N N N M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N M (\7 A W 1 d' N N N N N V' d' N O GQ I i I 1 II 1 I U X I H O O O O O M H O N H N N M a' H O oo N H c0 H M H U ' D I Ln d ;1+ 1 1 1 -1 d' N N 1 4 , Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln In N M N co c0 m H N N Ln co a'z I r o0ao O c0 c0 v o0 r r r- r- r rd'kDlOHHHM MM r H i 0 m m m m m O 0 of O O 0 0 O 0 000000000 O O I I tz-L z H 1 H H I � � U) U] \ E 0 1 H H H H H a U � r/1 U \ H i a w a H I Q (x z H O y+ a a P: O W QI 1 (11 Q x E-+ HEH w E x H ol a4 U zz a zzzzzzzzzz U z Q !x co H HH Q HHHHHHHHHH U1 H m 1 z 1:�0 a tn rn O \ v1 FCFC v1 FCRC r�r�FCFC��FC� \ xx W I O 0 PQ H A W L7 0 A U 0 0 w A 1 H wx a Z z z z z M cc z L7C7 UL7UL7UL7L7L7 z L7 X O a H H H W \ z z H z z z z z z z z z z w z 1 Or•C x a4 E - 1 E - I (x a HH H HHHHHHHHHH (1' H rC r.0 W W AQ �C QAAQAQAQAQ W A 'x LnN 1 O N� x C4 LO w > as x 0000000000 w a 1 U Nl0 H �1 L9 W W O z < H W HHHHHHHHHH 1 W Md Ln d Ol a a co 0 rx QQ 01 QQQQQQpQQQ 0 Q R l0 H H N H O 0 H U H CA W O W A W W CO W 0.1 GY1 0.1 PQ U !� i 1 U I z � U H Fz-I U U zz a z I H w 1 -L O H E rw 94 i O m UU O rail UU w . 1XII4 a HH WWWWWWWWWW CA A w 4 C7 C7 L7L7UUC7L7L7C7 H W z x zz V) c o w a x rx as 0 0rxrxrx0rx 000 � a W 00 �' a � 0000000000 Q a w QQ wwwwwwwwww A rC I U1 P4a x UU > H W x co UU < C7U C7 C7 L7 C7 C7 L7 C7 L7 H U x l 0 x x 0 x x z q H H a H H H H H H H H H H O I f11 co W Q co �' f�.' P; a P: 6�' P: f�' f1' t� R: fx A: f� z f1 I W E+ E-1 W WWWWWWWWWw O W 1 u W �� m O 04 U U a N N N N N N N N N N 'x h m x 0 ww UUUUUUUUUU w a ww H 1- 3 a Q > as W HHHHHHHHHH p,' ,D I U q A A A A A A A A A W W rr4 rz. CT4 rx, rT4 rM4 rX4 rx4 [z. r=, 0:4 Cz [z. i 1 I 4c # jc -tc Lc *K 0 4, -k -1c i� is 1 CDaD 000 00 000 .--Ir-1 rr , 00 00 00 LnW -1 --fir-{ 000 co 4 oo O o Ei I lD lO 000 00 000 wID co oo 00 00 NN MLn LD IO 0m 0m0Hm 0 L r-IN 00 Ln Ln Z I . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q 1 00 0LnLn 00 Ln Ln O WW W .o Ln Ln 00 0000 maDr w N 00 riH 0 1 111 Ln LnrN Ln Ln rr Ln r- L- l0\D r r MM r-1 r-1 0)00 00 r HriNM LnMLn 0) MM Ln U) rr 1 Q V)' cM lO H d d' lD l0 M m 01 0 0 lD l0 H H i?i? Ln M m H r-I N M N oo N r Ln l0 VT H O V} V} t?;/} i V1 i? V} V} V} i? , L} L} I I V) [/} H r -{ r r H U i r�r rir �� Ln w1 xl x vl w Ei W 1 r1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M (M (M M M M M H H I H H W q10) mm m mm m m m m m mm m mmmmmmmmmm m m 'L 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O O 0 0 0 0000000000 0 0 U I 0 00 O (D C) 0 0 0 0 0 00 o O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O o O O o O o o o o o o 0 o O O W x l 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O p 0 O 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 0 p p O 0 x U 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N v I 01 a z l d+ Ln to r W m O H N M Ln l0 r H I Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln to W lD w w 1p lD A w A lD A w w A l0 A w A lD A lD A lD A lD A l0 A lD A lD A Zi U I lD -k lD ic l0 - lD 4% to l0 i� lD -K l0 * to ik lD ik l0 -x O x I w w w w V w w V I'D V w w L9 V l0 V to _ V lfl V to V U U 1 Ln N I � I � I a a �I I � I Ln 0 W 0 O Q o a�E: O D N z a 0 z' v� w ri U H O z� H i I I I H I O W U � I I 0 H I E+ al H Ui m Wi Q I x x x xxxxxxxx x x x x x x m m x x x O O O 00000000 O O O O O O 00 00 O O O r-i O 0 O O 0 0 0) N Ln CI H m m m m to m m m tD Ol 0 0) r H 0 O 0) m m m m Ol m m m m Ol H M N r Ln N Ln N 0) N Ol Ln r D rrrrrrrr r w Ln m r (n Ln a 00 r 0 r N 0 I`J co W 0 00 c0 c0 co a0 00 co CD O 0 Ln W dl O a0 c0 co d' O '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O H M dl Ln O O O LO O a' 00000000 O O H M O O H 0) H H O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M O O O W 0 0 O O O O O H m H M M M M M M M M m M H H M r H H H ri dl M H N M M N N N N N N N N M d N M M d' N N N N N M M I d d d' d d' d' d' W d U' d' d' M W d' N N 1 I H N i H 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I H 1 H O M d N d 1 N I H 1 W I O 1 H 1 O I 1 H H 1 1 O O 1 H I H H M Ln N N N W M M M M M Ln M N M LO Ln cr W d rM H M M M r d' M M H w r r H H r H to w H O 1W d' c0 0 M M M O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O r 00 dl Ol O O O z z H H z z H H FC m FC m W m H U W H U Ea U m U m \ H \ m H W m m W H w a > a W > U w z z U > H 0 R: O H a z m H H D W z 04 a O w O a W W W as x Ei w W a x m P E-1 E-1 E1 E E-1 Ei E-1 x a m H H a, a, >+ z P m a U zzzzzzzz U a m p a, a, p H m D CO a H H H H H H H H m D a H H DD M \ rC 9 \ m rC m > m m a� 9 H 4 O � O L7 U O U 0 U p c 0 9 Q E-1 z z H U U U U U L c c z z H m U z z W z z m H H W m z z z z z z z z W H m \ < H H x 0 W \ m H Q'. m H H H H H H H H 04 H Cl) a H E -1 aP, x a m FC W w QQQQQQOQ w FC W w H f:49 a W w x w w aaaaaaaa w m a w > a C4 D4 MM H 7 CI+ W z O HHHHHHHH z W W O f< D WW Olm D O a 0 D4 DDxDDDDD 0 D a rx Dx q as 0) N OI a ax O U a m [QCQtomm mm U Q O a Ei FC 00 —1 (14 W H a m Ei P4 0 P E-1 I 9 I 01 I x1 U 1 W I R; U I W I E- 1 m W H H L7 r->r W Q P: x x U U W w x x U I U a 0 z H U x z U D w O x U U U U D r z Q H W y1 W f:4 m m m 7i H 04 a H H z H Ea x x E-4 FC H U W a 00000000 a 04 x H H U 00 m Q H vUUUUUUU rlr U x a v4 QA xx m rC xxxxxxxx x W 3 00 Qq z a z7 m z UUUUUUUU m z O DxP4 Zz w W z W mmm Ei rC w x 04 P4 FC FC z m H I! �l m F-i W f Ul PQ PQ CQ GO m PQ E-1 U a m U a ww or s x w x 0 C4 C7 0 x x x x x H FA H h � h is is -K -k �v 00 00 LO LL10 Ln Ln Ln N dl H 00 00 NN MM 00 00 O Om OfMM NN MM co 01 01 0 0 co VI N m O (3) Ol M 0) 00 00 00 M M d' d' N N Ln Ln Ln N r O Ln Ln H H M M 00 10 to C: 0 (D 0 [L* r M r r rOl d* C 0 Ln Ln rr NN HH N C tO LL1H 0000 H d'a' tO ID NN MM LO Ln NLn -4 C d'd'NVl Ln MM 0lm MM N00 MM NN Vrr Ln M 00 Ln LO 1 d LO Ln N N H H V '4' L� i? H i?L}V)- H IV H H V)-413- V)-413- i? VT I Ln M V)- vi N N N N M M LT i/1' I M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M H H H H H H r-i H H H H ri H H H I al Ql dl al al al m al al m m Ol 0) 0) Ol 0) 0) 0 0 0 00000000 0 o O o o O O o O 00000000 0 o 0 o 0 0 I O 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 10 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 1 1 10 Ol O H N M d' to tD r I l0 tO r r r r C-- r r r i W A lD n W A 1 10 A tD h to A t0 A W n t0 A t0 h I tO 41 w i l0 is to -k l0 is l0 -k w * lfl is -10 -k to * I t0 V w V w V w V w V tD V w V _ to V tD V t0 V M M M M M M M H H H ri r-i H ri rnm rnrn rn of rn 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 O O ► O 0 O co 00 o O 0 00 O 0 O O O N N N N N N N oD m O ri N r r m 00 co to n tD n to n to n w n V kD V\,D V W V �o V 1 � I b1 I a 1 a1 (� I I x C I O xx 00 x o x O xxx x x xx x x x x x x xx. x x x If1 1 000 O o 00 O O O 00000 O O o x 0 >1 I � I v � i W 1 O O m I o q1 N z I a I 1 0 z H U 1 H I O Lnw L— C— m m O M V O Ln H O HHHHH l0 N al 'J I OD L- L- r- d N N M 01 lD L— 0 0 0 0 0 w O H [� Ln H OD 00 - N l0 w 01 I 'l l N m M w Q\ 00 W 00 co 00 00 C— N M C— I O O 00 H N N N O 0 M M ko %D Ol N O 0 c0 c0 (0 00 co 00 0 CO co I H 0 0 O �10 %.0 l0 N O H H O 00000 O O M O I r-I o0 H O 0 0 0 0 0 O o H O I O H 1 H O O M M O H O O O O O O 00 H O O H H H H H M O O p z x I N M M N w M H r-i H N N N H N 61 H H ( a' M N N N N N M H M O �:) W 1 N v d V' W d d' d V' M d N N N M w m 1`'1 M M M m d m N M O W I N d H d v W 'IV dl w d d' t' O U I , N H Ln Ln H H H H H H H 00 H O w H H H H H H c-i CO H z I co L- L- N t' H r- N N N W d d H N d d m 0 L` co N N L` Ln M 1 Ol 0 0 O O O O O M O H O 0 OD 01 01 M h ID H H dl H r H l0 lO m I O 01 LD 0 0 0 0 0 O O 1 z I z I z z , I � H I M W x z I fc W W (Q Ln W Vl Ul \ J 01fc4 u W WWW W a H \ H 1$ z z H H H H H O W W a H' Ww a aaa a O >> 0 a1 1 w H H a a a a a x 1� rr, H I o mul a a a a a v P . U q H �D tz) tz) U1 C7 L7 z v 1 Ul Ul C]!1 � \ zz H U q l ( ( z U L7 L7 L7 0 z z W H W W W W W W O U I \\ H H z �v�z ',� z x z z z z z H Ur z IU as H HHH HHH H W x 00 O W W 00000 co H <FC464 < w Q x a a 9 O xxxxx aaaaa co I Ln �� x x xxx a w 000 w H x WwwWW to w Q w 00 �� w (n www w z w0 a x a aaaaa w O H z N HH o H 000 0 ° �°; w o1 wwwww x x 0 I H W H HHHHH q a Pq U 1 1H zz U Iz UUU z z z z ° H H 1 0 HHH CD o a s c,(n�, U U U U H ' x x H z co I x x H H H aaa HH ulw 0 H < x < W rxlw 0 1 q UU H H U aaa zz U H x H OU OOU a 17 E A m UlUlt:) x w 1x1xx O O DD H H H H H O W x aQ w H m z c a w a s � ° o H H H ww r m ��w xxx w x x 00000 \ x w I z zz 1-7 z 000 a 0O U 00000 H w �� V4 ww U�4 z x '� z zzzz U Q a ca H v FC 33 q A zzzz 1 a as 4 4 000 aaa >z., r H � X � HHHHH z z z z I I 4 n: �,� �',���"� � � � x i -x 100 H 1 00 4l 00 (y)H mNN -k Ln Lf) 41 00 -k 0m( -k 00 00 m0fM 0101 41 NN is �r- # NNNNODw -K 00 ac 00 .K W c6 O Z I . . . . . r- r . . 00 . . M W 0001 . . . . HH . . 00 (M Ln co NN MM MM 0000610 00 00 MM O �D I 0 0 1 Ln Ln Ln ;V O 1,0 M m L` r 0 00 4 cn m m . . Ln Ln L� Ln N N W �v c}1 Ln Ln LD ID IO IO M OD L- L- 0 0 H H O 1 d v z v � - r V)- V)- m M H H Ln W Ln 61 L0 10 N N L(1 Ln H N N c6 00 i? L?• i/1- LI- N 1 C- h Ln Cn H H M H H L} L} L} H H M L} L} i? S/] M m h m m 61 O> .U} i/} L} i? H H I d �M O O WI x. x U 1 W I H 1 C4 H W I M H I H M m H H M M M M M M M M M M M M m M m M h'1 M M M m (S 1 \ \\ H \ H \ H H H \ \\ H \ H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H W g l rn 0101% rn rn rn m rn m \ rn \\ rn rn \ rn \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ x I O o0 0 0 0OO o O 0 C O rn o rn 0 rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn 000O0 O O o 0 J U 1 0 W 1 0 O O 00 O O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O W x l 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 OOO O o 0o O o O OOOOO O O 0 0 x U I N N N N N 0 0 0 N N N 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 U i N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 i a H z I m 10p V (6 Ln cp w r W 06 rn O H U I I l0 n l0 n l0 n l0 n w n 00 w n c0 I'D n m l0 n 0) kD n 01 w n 0) w n 01 1 10 m 0) 61 01 z U 1 lD w * LD 4k w 4k w K w -k l0 it 1 10 # \D -k l0 * \D ar n w w n w n l0 n lD O x i lD v w v l0 v w \O v \D v \D v w v w v w v l0 v * l0 v w i l0 V lD k lD V l0 i D U U I lD V l0 � I � I rn 1 M 04 al x x xx x x x x xxxxxxxxxxx x x x xx xx w o 0 00 0 0 0 0 00000000000 0 0 0 00 00 LO !T I 0 1 wI o O OQ 1 awl o DI N zI a DDDDDDDDDD D z HHHHHHHHHHH d WI N zzzzzzzzzzz o0 H UI Ln WWWWWWWWWWW o0 oI O O 00 r l O W W W W W W W W W W W O Ln O M M ;> I co O cow r- dt 14 oo HHHHHHHHHHH m dt M �M NN Z I o M 0oD oo M co co 9 9999 Fl. K 6:4 0 co ao 0o 00 H I O 0 00 O O r - O E- IHHHHHELHHHE -L 0 ri 0 w NN i O O 00 O d 01 O U l to C O M M E O m U] co co U] O H O L— � N N I In O 0 0 O O O O 00000000000 O L— O N N 00 H I r- c0 LL1ri 01 H H c0 Hr-iHriHHHHHHH H M 01 NN d' VI 7. P I H M N N M d' M M N N N N N N N N N N N M dt M N N N N D W I N dt d' d' d' d' d' d' d+ d' d' d• dt 0 9 1 i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I i 1 I i 1 11 U '2 t N L� H H H H N C M r I M c0 c I r i rl t 1 rid I H M r I w Lfl c I r i U I r-I N d'd Ln M N N Lo Ln N N r- IM M N Ln In r-I to d' H NN NN a' I m d' d'dt r H lD -13 L — HHH OlM ri 1-1 L- �M r H M dt kD MM 1 O O O O O O O O 00000000000 O O O O O O O z H mm H z H z H H Z co ca U H HH 7 F U w z , W w \ H U] U1 U1 U] U1 CI1 U] U1 Ul U1 CA H \ CQ o I a w > wwwwwwwwwww 04 a C C zz 1x H I Gq H O � H H H H H H H H H H H O D D � W W H I 9 W a O W W aaaaaaaaaaa W 0 0404 HE-L 04 1 yi U a x v1 U a4 C14 a w a,04 a,,aL04 waa rn x zz H a a a a a a a a a a a co U H H H a c a D DDDDDDDDDDD a w x m cn ul ul rr� cn cn ul rrl vl cn Z l mcn W a s q i w m H0 Z 0 c 00 C7U00C9000 0 f tl U WW HH H z z z z z z z z z z z H z DD z A y., H W U1 U1 >L HHHHHHHHHHH U1 H W FZ+F1+ F4 I H H fx a Ln H H H H H H H H H H H H H n x x i z H xFC w 9 W H FCI�FC9t�r-CFCr- 949 W UI W Lx D4 04 04 t O a U14 f=+ H Gi a 0.i 1'40. C4 PS C4P4 0.4 0404 W 7 Z O OH DD I H H 04'W z z O H WWWWWWWWWWW O ra-�. �� x0 ° a w 00000000000 a H U 2 ww I a o m co 1 I WW I o vv i U U Z [y H H U H 0 a 04 I O H I N 04 W a - H O O m v1 M H U W ° A w z U P4 �a�a f H H H H H H H H H H H FC H H z' ca 00000000000 W 041 �i w W HH a aaaaaaaaaaa x w W Q$ LS z U WWWWWWWWWWW H A 0404 FCFC w �9 H AAAAAAAAAAA zz ' I � a a ' rHi1 U1 wwwwwwwwwww O W a 00 ww I_q vvUUVVUUVUU a m x 9 124 04 pOi P HHHHHHHHHHH - W 0 00 I H H H a 0 04 a Gi rZi C*i fit C*i r14 fu Gi Cr+ GN rsi Cl H H U U 00 I z z O O [x W O Ul Gi fi.t Gi fri G*i C*i fT+ fii f=t 04 04 a 04 a' g 4 p A 04 04 x x x£ z z z 00000000000 0 a a I -K -k is -K is 4 1 O 00 dt d• Md'l� 00 mm Ln U1 Ln H w r- lD O 00 H lD L- co 00 IDS 00 Ln d'm 00101 Ei I O 00 r- L— 000 00 Ln LO 00 00 M O m r- M M r- ril010 0400 Ln Ln 0 . . . . . . . . . Z , . . . . . . . . . . . D t O L11 Ln W t.0 Ln N L� c0 c0 co 0 01 0l 040 oD c0 M dt r - I W Ol H co LI1 M Ln Ln r I O1 Ol lfl l0 oo oo l0 w 1-1 L— O I M cO co M M In rn dt r- r- d dt co oo %D lD H +/]-tha/> d v} d' H Ln r-1 c0 O Ol Ol Ln Ln M M M M r- r ri c0 1 v} d' d' i? v} I-I v} N VT v)- lD w Ln U) v} v} t? v} v} i? v} H M Ll w w v} vT Ln Ln d? v? v? M V)- v} v} v} v} VT H ri I r-I ri L 3 Lo v} L? �- U t w. xI a vI w H [T] 1 M M M M m M M MMMMMMMMMM r- L M M M M M M H H H H H H r-I c-I ri H H ri W A I Ol 01 Ol Ol Ol Q> Ol Ol al 0) Ol M Ol a\ dl 01 al O1 Ol dl d> d> 1 O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \\ \ O O O O .Yi U I O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O C) 0 0 0 0 U W I O O 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O 00 O O O O 00000000000 O N N NN NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U O I LO r aD CA o H a z I Q O 0 N M d o 0 0 r�i H O H d> O O o o O O n r- n r- n r n L- n r n U x I n w n r n r- n r- n r n r n r n � .� iD * w i< <D i< <D i< w i< z U I * w * �.D iN \D * lD 1K lD is W * w * lD v 110 v tD v w v \o v w v D w l v lD v .o v I'D v %,o v kD v lD v w v to 0 x i U U t 00 4) rn ro I04 Ln a L w O 0 01 0 0, X 0 D N z a co 0 z H U H 0 H H z 0 D O CQ U x Up FC z z O H H C14 H U m W Q 05 0 Q W r' P4 W H U] H C7 W v, J w x U a H U z D O U x x x x x x xxxx x x xxxx x x x xxx x x O O O O O O 0000 O O 0000 O O 0 000 O O H z 0 x U W x U W H FC Q x U W x U O z x U W x U x O o0 Ol O O O H H N H w Ol O O O O O O N r- H r-I H H m Oi cN r-1 l0 O d' Ln r�-1 r-1 0 W O Ln r- W W 00 a0 d+ l0 0 r M d- r H c0 O a0 CD M N O co W W 0 H x N M Ln 01 M 0 0 ri H H N O 01 O O 0 l O 0 0 0 0 N H N M M Ln T O O 0 0 a0 0 O 0 O O O M O 0 0 0 0 L0 d' H r-1 1-1 H r-I N O W W d' d' O O O O O 00 M 0000 O O l0 l0 l0 w O H O 0 0 0 N N M H M M t- M M M M M Ln M H H H r-I H O Ol dr Ln Ln N r M N N N d' d' Ln Ln Ln Ln M d' M M M M N H M N N N N O d' w W d' M d' d+ d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d• W N M H H d' O H d Ln l0 v Ln M H H H H H Ln H H H H Ln M N d' d' N Ln ri l0 w l0 � N H M M M M r N N d' d' d' N H r d' d' M 00 M l0 w w w co M H H H H d' 0 r d' d' d' W 01 O O O o L O 1 10 w w to Ol O 0 0 0 0 O 01 O O o o Ol o z U) H U1 D z H zW U U C7 rC H 7 H a co u a FA H H H H ca a x z W m a z z H a H a U H a H H D H H H U] Ul co Ul CQ D U to FC U Ul U1 FC FC > H H H H D co Ul Ul Ul Vl w \ x w W to W CQ x x H zzzz a Q wwww a w ulul a z D L7 H WWWW \ W WWWW Cry U HHH W z Ul z 0 U' U x x2: E 0 H rz. C=., CL, CL, z H z z Q Q D O \ H z z FC W W W W z < H rx w W CL+ U a H H H >>>> H z 0000 H 0; �FCFC w FC Q Q H 0000 H 0 zzzz FC ca w u,xx Q> C4 !x a a a Ul CL' 04 04 04 z H H H H H a� w CL+ H U U O W FC w H H D w a4 a4 04 a4 H Ul aaaa W 0 z p0'PZ H H 04 CL D D Q Z� X X PL W H H H H W r.� O (DEW W O r� H O CO CO �C Q Q H H H H W Q Cx Cz Cc Cx O U W U W W U z X .�7 UUUU O O O a, zzzz CL. U U W H H H H D x w a Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul U Ul 0: 04 O H zzzz z FC 124 124 0: 04 W W U U U U D L7 0000 H H WWWW 0; 04 Ix zzz z z Ul Ul Ul U1 QQ D D W H H H H U z H FC 0 Ur LG P4 Ix LG Ul C0 W H �+ Q U H ails LS 118 z D N 0000 Fc FC QQQ Q a a a H 0 U H 04 U U U U w W a C4 04 C4 rQ H w 04 z H CQ Ul Ul Ul Ul H Q W W W W P4 04 x 000 0 D P: 3 H H H D W W W W z 04 0: a 04 H H U CL. CL, G4 Pa a FC U H 04 a 0000 H O n: Ul w FC 4 U HHHH a a 0000 O O W WWW w w Q a w a+ zzzz at H UUUU U U W Www w W a w x > w w w w w at al a, a ai a4 W xxxx U1 z Ul Ul � 4 HHHH H H ^4 :'4.4x x x z > W W CO H xxxx O 3 0000 O O FC FC FCC 4 FC FC W W H H O O UUUU U U x xxx x x C4 04 04 04 P: P4 Ul Ul co Ul to Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul U1 co co U1 co i< i< i< it i< i i i< OD 00 HH Hr-i 00 00 00 w001M0 00 00 00000 00 Ln Ln 00 100hM MM O O O .. a0 0 .. c0 co .. 0 0 .. O O .. 0 0 .. M O w r- r ..... 0 0 0 0 Ln Ln 0 LO Ln ...... O O 01 01 O O m -1 (n d �O LD O OO O10) co W OO OO Ln Ln d•00 M01 Ln .. wl0 .. OO OOl 01 Ol c0 .. l0 lfl .. ON .. Ln Ln .... 01 dr MLA .. OO . l0 HH - 4 - 1 - 4 - 4 L0 lO 'IV 1 NN 0d'm W M MM OO Cl) HNH01 L}t? OO HH O 01 d' d" Ln Ln M i!} i? L} i? H .-i N (N i? L2 H -4 t- Ln V l0 d' e-1 H r-i H V)-V)- H L? r-i 00 i? L} N L} L} M L? L} i? t? L} L} i? L} to to Ln � d' N N vi- vi- v� yr H irr M M M M M M MMMM M M M M M M M M M M M tM M M H ri H H H H H H H H H ri r-i H H H H H ri r-I H H H r-i \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ rn 01 m m rn rn rnrnrnrn rn rn rnrnrnrn m rn rn 010101 01 rn O O o O O o 0000 0 0 0000 O O 0 000 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ O 0 O O 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 O O 000 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 O 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 00o0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 000 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M d' Ln l0 r- c0 Q1 O r-I N M d• M l0 0 r-i H H H H 1-1 r-i H N N N N N N N N r- A � n r- n C- n � n L- A L- A r- n r- A r- n r- n t- A L- A L- A r A r- to i< t0 i< %.0 4� w * w i< I'D i< w * w * w i< w i< �10 i< w * w i< w * 110 i< �10 w v \o v k.0 v �o v k.D v w v �o v �.o v �10 v %D v io v ID v ID v k.0 v �0 v I'D H z 0 x U W x U W H FC Q x U W x U O z x U W x U 0) 1 � I � I a a � xx x xx x xx xx x x x x x to 2 00 O 00 O 00 00 O O O O O LO r�� 1 I o , w1 0 OWI CD 042, o p, N z a 1 z• H U, O o O H , d d' W d W d d d d W d d1 d d d' d N N M w 0 N O N O H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 1-1 HH R:2: H I I m t--1 O m p 1 mwWWWWWWWW WmWWWm 14 C4 N E-4H co rn'ZI HH W m Ln H r z l m m m m co m m W W m m m m m m W 30 I'D 0404 W 0) 0) O O W w m m o H I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w H U) w W O N l0 W It H d U) co H 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 m m H m m O H d H H H Ln co O M Im000000000000000 00 o Ho 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 [-� I r W W co W W W W W W W co m m m co HH H OM 0) HH HH m H H U) H Z p; 1 O M m M m m m m m M m m m m m m M m M H d M N N m N N N N M M (D W 1 N d' d W d 04 d d' V d' VI d 04 d' d' d d' W W d' d d' d d d d d d' d' d W O PQ I U2: 1 mHNHHd W 0 Nmd HH H U)U) N M W HH d H d H M u I H 0 co H N NU) N N N N N m Ln U) Ln HM in NN U) NN U)U) Ln V Ln M N ryZ 1 6)H HM mMmdld w OlOrrr r- r- r W co r d w rr r d r H H 10000000000000000 O O O MO) O 0 0 00 O O O O O z , m H x z mm m ww fe V UU U H P4 W U C7 U 2 , H H a \ mm H m m z H O, >> > a a WW >W W W H > H, p; P. p; W 0 H H 04 H H H x 1 H wwwWwwwwwwwwwww w w U O as wa a a m w a UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU mm m m x 0404 ma H a a H m H I H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H U a 04 a z 04 04 a a 0404 a ox m �:)z ax H x x w a U xaxrxrxarxxrxr�rxxrxrxxx FCrC rC w \ mm r4 ca rC m m a z mlwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww z z fxA w z W I H m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 00 0 w U o u o u 0 0 \ 0 H H E-1 E-1 z z Hz U` z z 0 H A l >1 >+ >4 >+ >H >4 >+ >+ >+ >> >+ >+ m m m CL. < w H H m H z H H z m 1 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H m m m z m H H H H H m 1 p',HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH W r_ r W - � w coo W FCFC w9 A FC FC H W 1 waa0a/-a1-044ataI- ahllll- a1-04Fl iT4 w W H w rxrx wx a x x z r14 1 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 00 O 0 m z W W O W H W W H O 1 9HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH P4 C4 aS FCW O as rxa7 a a P. p-' , gpAp :):D pp�Dpp�DA 04 04 a SA U 00 040 al o O 04 a I 0 U 10000000000000000 00 U 1 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U W H �aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 0404 H oo a 1 HHE- IHHHHHHHHHHHHE EaH 1�D �DDrD �D �D �D �D �D �D �D �D �D �D :D t:) �D �D W OO mm u O W CA U U U W U a fx 0 1 HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HH H >4>H a m U p a Cl .laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 0404 E-1 E-4 z 1 cQCQwmoncnmma�watwcQpncQm W w x HH 0404 HH w a m x x W 1 :D ,D D D :D �D �DtD�D �DaD �D W u HH L7 L7 H O W m 0 04 04 a a 04 04 04 a a a a a a a a a a s m H H H H H H A o WWwWWwWWwWWWWwWw WW W wW AA Iwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww ww w ww zz >4 z m w z 1 a 04041 a10104 a04a101 f 1444 a1 a1QIQ4 as a 121, 04 1x H 9 w O � 0 1 0 0 0 00 w as rr-,� a 1 x x p IxRCxxxxxxxxxx x x xx HH H z O O H I m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 1 i -k -k * -k k -k L C 1 Ord O)W Q1 d1 O)O O)M Ln lOMH 000 d d O)0M 00 MU)m OOO HH co co U)ll) 00 OO i 0w H d W to NMM HMa%W )0 d 000 O) O% 000 00 (D mm 000 Lo in rr m W Ln LO 00 1 I a co co lOHNO m0 mw r0 MOH V H Ol O) mOM 00 O'-0 )0 ID OI U) O)O) W m m W rr U) U) 0 1 w MdlrM mNrr Loon O)mmH0 NW H Mm (AW U) MM mm(V m0)a% d [1 00 00 X010 d d N O V} O \0 V)- N V)- M r O r co co r m m N V)- m H H H V) N m V? d d' d H H m m N N H H VI-V} L } 1 ll)H H HH NMN�O NmH d' d1 HH vi- V)- V} l0 N V} m U 1 V} Vr Vr V>- W 1 x1 cx U I w I H m W I m m m m m m m m M m m m m m m m M M m m m M M M m m M M M M H H I H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H (, (•r I \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ W A 1 OlO O1 a>041T a>041 O)a\O)O al Ol Ol 61 d>T Ol 0 01 0 0) 00 Ol O) 0 O) O p; l o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .'�., U 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O 00 00 O Or O O 00 U W 1 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 w x 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 '.1.' U I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U I 0 1 m o H N m d LO w r co m a z I co (Y) m m m m M m m m M H N U x r n r n r n r n r n r n r n r n r n r n r n r z U I w - � * - �O i� l0 f� l0 -k l0 -k w iv w -k w iv w -k l0 k O x 1 v w v w v w v v v v v m y io v v k.0 v U U1 0 H I N b� 1 (� I R D lxx xxx xxx x x xx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x 2100 000 000 O O 00 000000000000000000000000000 O 7 � 1 � I o a1 0 04 � o D1 o z I N I 1 00 Q 0 1 1 1 w T 1 "D lD Cn O �.O 1 W 100 ri 000 r-I ri H ri H H H ri H H H ri N N N N N N N O 0 1 1 1 O O O I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O H I H H o 0 0 0 0 0 k H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H o 0 I r- r- wOM NNN M H O N > I N N r r- N w c0 M d' D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D N Z 1 1 1 coco HHH w w NN t7UL7L7UC7UL7t7t7t7UUC7UUt70 >7Ut7t7C7t7C7 O H I r r- O O O U U U Ln O N N D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D m I NN OO 000 r-1 o mm r-CFCr.Cr.Cr.0 FCr - CFCr.C o I I riN OOO 100kO O O OO H H H ri r-1 H r1 H H H H H H H H H r-i HHHH Hi iriHH ri H 1 d w rid H hLnr r - I ri riH NNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNN NN NNNN NNN N Z a I N 0 N N N r i r I 11 N c r U t V t M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M D W 1 M N d' d' W N ri N N -1 w d' dI dt V' d' d' d' w-W IT O OQ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U I W M HriH NNN O N NN H Ndt H M dl H N H H H H H H H H H O NH,-iH H H zvH H U I M r-i -4 -A HriH [M M Ln Ln HwNNmm -1 MLn m N r- Nln r♦HN HLn N M �z I Mm MMM mmm O r- r- r- M H M M L- L� r L— H H H ri H VI MH HHH d'L- M M V' Ml— dA M 1 0 0 0 0 0 O O O m O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O t 1 w i U 1 a I Ki I x w U U H 1 a w m 0 1 ca w z w C z H I M I H W H 9 D EH 1 P aHa > a W I H H nt z w W F-I Cr] H 1 a4 H a ,.7 W a HH U I W W U1 U1 < w< CQ I a1 a1 > a r� W 1 0E < FC < w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w W w w ca 1 00 zzz wcQa, w zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz z I z z H W H H x ri) Mca 000000000000000000000000000 O H HXE-1 xzx a4 as xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x ut co < i2w < H D H rC FC < w al a, al al al ill al al ill a, a, a a a, a, a, a, a, a, n+ a, a a, al a1 P, a I2: 2: 04 Ha 4 0a Ln H EL E+ w W w w w w w w w w w w w w w W w w w w w w w w W w w w D ID WDW <UF4 0 z zz a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Iaa atotw wUw o w w 1 wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww w as 0W0 xFCx N a as HHHHHE- 1HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHE-LHHHH E- >>> 1 H H H HHH i < F4 4 U z www z as 0 I LL 04 C14 H W W Fi a o00 0 0 ww U QIcc www H m UU zxxxxx��������xxxx����� xxx x Z I zz UUU U C-8 as 2.x..xxxx2 2 2: 2: 2: 2: 2: 2: 2: x x x XX x 2: 2: 2 2 x 2 WIF-1H HHH D 99 000000000000000000000000000 0 9 I fn V)cQri) > >> a ca E-4 E-4 UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU U 1�� W W W W W W cc z w w F4 H H H H H H H H H H H H H E-H H HHHHHHHHHHH EA I a s xxx CQcQCQ z z as cQCQCQ CQCQCQMMMtoMCQcQCQCQMCQCQCQCQ UI 1214 P4 UUU 0 w WWWWwWWWWWWWWWWWWWWwwWwWWWW w I H H H U U U U x a a 3:R: 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3;3: 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 I a s W W W 3 3 3 94 194 aaa \\\ U x E CQ mU] CQCQCQU) CQ cam cam Coco cam CQMEQRICIICQCQCQTQUICQ CQ CCoc mmm ccaccoV 0 ) H E+ E-1 DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD D I I I i� K x i� - 1 0 0 0 0 01 0 61 m L— L— M 0 0 0 0 M w * w O rA 0 01 M M O 0 0 N N O O N co N N ri m ri ko N Ln LO 0 0 ri Ln H I CD *1 *1 0 ) W LO Ln wL- N 00 00 lO O Ln 0r- v W 010 H N O 00 H H ri H 0(D 0 N H 0.4 001 m 00 r- N D I wow L L- Nw mHr- m mm 00 0) NN ri ri d+0 Mco w kD N N O wO N O N w w O M L� m LL1 r-I ri C) N aD O 0 I H L} ri 'w L— Ln r- L- Tv M LO L- Ll 0 0 LO LO H O N I- ri M w LO N I- C— ri 0 01 w O r- H H H M m w ri M M m m M m I L)- V)- M Vlw V) -dt M m V' r- w to Ln Ln L)-V). ri m -i H H H N L1•L}i!?•f?i/?• H V)�H r-1 V) -V)V)w L}N i?>:/2 H i? �N i1. 0 i? O ri oD M x 1 H [? N dv i11• U I rir rn �n W 1 xl a U 1 W I H U1 w I M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M H H I H H H 11 'A H ri H H H H H H H H H ri H H H r-i H H rA ri H H ri H H H H ri H ri ri H H H H W g I m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 00 000 000 o O o0 000000CD 00CD 00000O0 0 000000o0O o U I o o 0 0 0 coo O O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CPO O O O o 0 0 O w 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W x 1 00 0 0 0 0 0 o O o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o x U 1 N (N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U O 1 4 z 1 0 r N M c}t U) w m H I d' d' V d' d' IT t' d� U ,4 I r- A h A C- A r- A h A r- A r- A h Zi U I O * to # w * w -K to * to * to * lD D W I \o v to v w v lD v w v w v to v w 0 x I U U I H H a) 1 U1 1 a a1 I I 1 � I Ln I m , O a �V I O 'D 1 Z N , I a OI w z I m 1 W I H H 1 O 1 I Z 1 H 1 H I Z o4 pW1 O M I U � i Upl �z1 Z1 0 1 H 1 H I a 1 H 1 py 1 U I m I w 1 Q I 04 O z W P H 0 x U w x p�, U W H m W H H Z7 rC W Q 0.i x U W w x x U U a z U x z U o x U U xxxx x x x xxxxxxxxxxxx xx x a1 as a aaa a 0000 0 0 0 000000000000 00 O H HH H HHH H 0000 0000 0000 O N N N N O NNNN 00 O O O 0 -I mmmm OD O O O O O HHHr-1 O N N N N M M M M M 1 1 1 1 1 I H N H d Ln Lh r H LO N H ri M r 00 0000 al Ln Ln Ln 111 LL1 In Ln L11 Ln LL1 L11 LL1 rrrrrrrrrrrr N N N N N N N N N N N N l0 LD w w l0 L9 w w kD w to lfl 00 m r O l0 l0 lD l0 l0 l0 lfl l0 lD lD l0 l0 H ld� 000000000000 00 m N N N N N N N N N N N N co OD m O O N N N N N N N N N N N N O H N N N N N N N N N N N N H O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H c0 O 0000W WO c000W W 00 N M M M M M M (M M M M M M M d d' d' d' d' d d d' d d d' d d d' I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H r1 d'HN0m1- IHHNd ri Ln N NNMMNHNMWOoM M r d MM w w M d HHH lD O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z H x H a x z a \ 0 z H H z H C4 a w H m U H x a a Q W U �a H H H H F4 W as F 00 X4 FXI L8 x m� z H H CL1 fs+ H H w w 00 mm ww 0 H f:49 00 ww U W U z w Q H w w O w x U rx x a m H x U O 3 a a w Q N N N m m m M M M 000 000 N O O N d Ln N N N d' d• d' I I I H Ln H N N d M w d O O O z H rC W UU H CQ � w az mxw ,q ri2l W H H xzQ 04 a H�z z az H H H H P E www ZRZ w w xxx M m M lD 0 O O O Ln M 1 r N 00 co W H H w w a O F-4 cM C4 z H w 0 m W ly O H E-1 O U z H a W z z w x * - ->< x In Ln Ooln mm OO Ln Ln NN LO 4 M m M wOH d Hd Ln LL1 In LL1 In HOH OO 0 L 0111 OO NN00r 111 Ln Lf1 Ln mm m m(M O ca rW mM m d•ri dl d 1 r H d d rr NlO W 0 OmO NN 0 00 o lD NN HH d d r r H to m O M N H H w r Ln MLL1 Ln HH d d• HHN OO IDO OlO NN mm LnLn cD Ln Ln NN r mm W m tr- NwHl0 r-I14 mm HH NLn OO i/}NNd %D I'D i/1• vi- vl-i? i? {? H L} N i? N t/1- H V31 H N d1 d z/1- d lD lD H ri M L} M Ln Ln i/f i/} L?- V)- V)- H I M M M[ M M M M I Hri HH H H H 0000 O O O 1 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 10000 o O o 1 0 0 0 0 O O 0 1 N N N N N N N 1 I m O H N i d L(1 Ln Ln r n r n r n r n I to * 1 10 4c l0 -K lD I l0 v l0 V l0 v lD V M M M M M M M M M M M M HHHHHHHHHHH. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ mmmmm 00000000000 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ 00000000000 000000000000 000000000000 N N N N N N N N N N N N M L(1 r lfl \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ m m m m mm m mmm 00 O O O O O O O O \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ O O O O 00 0 O O O 00 O O 00 O 000 0o 0 0 00 O 0o0 N N N N N N N N N N Ln l0 r co m Ln L(1 Ln Ln Ln Ln A 1` n r n r n r n r n r v lD v w v lD v lD v lD V w d1 ri \ m O 0 O 0 N 0 lfl A r n q� to ?� v w v m ri r r N O .D M O m N d' Ln M r H O ri Ln Ln lD Ln r 1 10 O N N 0 N N r M H H O L(1 Lh O O 00 N H r-I 1 LL1 O O M N N N M LO Ln d' d d d' d' M M d I I 1 r r I N I Ln I r r L11 N N M N N N N d'd• r m co co m 00 O m W c0 m 0 z H x H a x z a \ 0 z H H z H C4 a w H m U H x a a Q W U �a H H H H F4 W as F 00 X4 FXI L8 x m� z H H CL1 fs+ H H w w 00 mm ww 0 H f:49 00 ww U W U z w Q H w w O w x U rx x a m H x U O 3 a a w Q N N N m m m M M M 000 000 N O O N d Ln N N N d' d• d' I I I H Ln H N N d M w d O O O z H rC W UU H CQ � w az mxw ,q ri2l W H H xzQ 04 a H�z z az H H H H P E www ZRZ w w xxx M m M lD 0 O O O Ln M 1 r N 00 co W H H w w a O F-4 cM C4 z H w 0 m W ly O H E-1 O U z H a W z z w x * - ->< x In Ln Ooln mm OO Ln Ln NN LO 4 M m M wOH d Hd Ln LL1 In LL1 In HOH OO 0 L 0111 OO NN00r 111 Ln Lf1 Ln mm m m(M O ca rW mM m d•ri dl d 1 r H d d rr NlO W 0 OmO NN 0 00 o lD NN HH d d r r H to m O M N H H w r Ln MLL1 Ln HH d d• HHN OO IDO OlO NN mm LnLn cD Ln Ln NN r mm W m tr- NwHl0 r-I14 mm HH NLn OO i/}NNd %D I'D i/1• vi- vl-i? i? {? H L} N i? N t/1- H V31 H N d1 d z/1- d lD lD H ri M L} M Ln Ln i/f i/} L?- V)- V)- H I M M M[ M M M M I Hri HH H H H 0000 O O O 1 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 10000 o O o 1 0 0 0 0 O O 0 1 N N N N N N N 1 I m O H N i d L(1 Ln Ln r n r n r n r n I to * 1 10 4c l0 -K lD I l0 v l0 V l0 v lD V M M M M M M M M M M M M HHHHHHHHHHH. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ mmmmm 00000000000 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ 00000000000 000000000000 000000000000 N N N N N N N N N N N N M L(1 r lfl \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ m m m m mm m mmm 00 O O O O O O O O \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ O O O O 00 0 O O O 00 O O 00 O 000 0o 0 0 00 O 0o0 N N N N N N N N N N Ln l0 r co m Ln L(1 Ln Ln Ln Ln A 1` n r n r n r n r n r v lD v w v lD v lD v lD V w d1 ri \ m O 0 O 0 N 0 lfl A r n q� to ?� v w v m .D O W m W W co u z U W H FC U a w wwwwwwwwwwww E m a m UUUUUUUUUUUU z H H H H H H H H H H H H H H m a >>>>>>>>D>>> rC 64 0.4 1240404R'144Q'04IY4.P4P 04 � Q z z wwwwwwwwwwww W W W W W 0 O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m H z w O O Q 9 H ca > r> r -1 >4 y4 >4 >-i }/ < FC xxxx z 9 m HHHHEIHHHHHHE HH � ala as 0 W W HHHHHHHHHHHH fy 04 a wwww H fx w rlaaaaaaaaaaa W W H 444.1 m U O HHHHHHHHHHHH E E 'D r4F4WW W W tx HHHHHHHHHHHH 49 O+ HHHH Q rx a gD �D�DxgQt:)Q x w U z H zzzz H UUUUUUUUUUUU 0000 D4 zzzzzzzzzzzz m H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 9� <� U w HHHHHHHHHHHH ca P4 z O UUULJ x O zzzzzzzzzzzz 00 3 pppp wwwwwwwwwwww mm >i m m x 2� a H w wwwwwwwwwwww �x m 0000 -1 P4 H L L7 L L9 L7 L7 L7 L7 L7 C7 L7 L7 U L) U U W O H W V FC rC FC FC rC a G: a mmmm VD L7 z 3zz3 m W H WWWWWWWWWWWW W W H �D �:) O mmmm x <9 <99994����3 ppt:)p > > 3 333333333333 0 z H x H a x z a \ 0 z H H z H C4 a w H m U H x a a Q W U �a H H H H F4 W as F 00 X4 FXI L8 x m� z H H CL1 fs+ H H w w 00 mm ww 0 H f:49 00 ww U W U z w Q H w w O w x U rx x a m H x U O 3 a a w Q N N N m m m M M M 000 000 N O O N d Ln N N N d' d• d' I I I H Ln H N N d M w d O O O z H rC W UU H CQ � w az mxw ,q ri2l W H H xzQ 04 a H�z z az H H H H P E www ZRZ w w xxx M m M lD 0 O O O Ln M 1 r N 00 co W H H w w a O F-4 cM C4 z H w 0 m W ly O H E-1 O U z H a W z z w x * - ->< x In Ln Ooln mm OO Ln Ln NN LO 4 M m M wOH d Hd Ln LL1 In LL1 In HOH OO 0 L 0111 OO NN00r 111 Ln Lf1 Ln mm m m(M O ca rW mM m d•ri dl d 1 r H d d rr NlO W 0 OmO NN 0 00 o lD NN HH d d r r H to m O M N H H w r Ln MLL1 Ln HH d d• HHN OO IDO OlO NN mm LnLn cD Ln Ln NN r mm W m tr- NwHl0 r-I14 mm HH NLn OO i/}NNd %D I'D i/1• vi- vl-i? i? {? H L} N i? N t/1- H V31 H N d1 d z/1- d lD lD H ri M L} M Ln Ln i/f i/} L?- V)- V)- H I M M M[ M M M M I Hri HH H H H 0000 O O O 1 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 10000 o O o 1 0 0 0 0 O O 0 1 N N N N N N N 1 I m O H N i d L(1 Ln Ln r n r n r n r n I to * 1 10 4c l0 -K lD I l0 v l0 V l0 v lD V M M M M M M M M M M M M HHHHHHHHHHH. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ mmmmm 00000000000 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ 00000000000 000000000000 000000000000 N N N N N N N N N N N N M L(1 r lfl \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ m m m m mm m mmm 00 O O O O O O O O \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ O O O O 00 0 O O O 00 O O 00 O 000 0o 0 0 00 O 0o0 N N N N N N N N N N Ln l0 r co m Ln L(1 Ln Ln Ln Ln A 1` n r n r n r n r n r v lD v w v lD v lD v lD V w d1 ri \ m O 0 O 0 N 0 lfl A r n q� to ?� v w v N H s O (x .... W O�Q 0 04 o D O 2 N W 0 i W H U H H O z H H zx � W O CQ U x U D �z z O H H a H !1' U C4 Q x O z w a w Ey m H 0 W U w x U H U z D O U a aaa aaa a a' a, a a a a4 a a" al falaa 04 ai fll H H H H H H H H H" H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H O a x U W x U w E� Q x U W x U O z x U W x U d'Ln ID r co co m cr Ln 0000000000 m mm O\ mm m Wlo 0000000000 m M M r d' Lo M M M M co a% d' d' d d' d d• d' '1 N lD lD W d'Ln Ln lO I'D w Ln l0 N H H lD W W W W W t0 W lO lD r coo N N N O 00 m O r H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d' 000 Hr{H O 00 00 O d' NN 0000000000 co H H H O O O M O O Ln O co 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r co of 00 000 O a0 co H N r HH HHHHHHMHHH H HHH Ln Ln Ln H Mm N M H MM NNNNNNNNNN N N N N M M M N d' d' d' cr N d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' I N I I I N NN I I L rrr I N 1 1 'v (Y) 1 H 1 H 1 N I I H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 d'NMHHNHHr -Id' H H H H N N N H Ln Ln M H H Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln N N N N ri d' Ln Uk a\ O1m co co 00 0% rr l0 M Ol HH rr r md lfl m d'd' 0 00o co00w o 00 0 0 0 00 0000000000 W W U U H U] Ulco W Ln coCQ >> W W W w W W W w W mco fy HHHHHH HHH NHH 0404 wW aaaaaa aaa H H H U U m co 01 al a s a1 a1 Ei 04 a a, W w W HH 1- � a as aa, a aal a! H r�4 Gr4Cz, >> as DDDDDD rio P�0�0Y. McacaMcaC1FCCQmm to O Ln 000 wW zz Ol H co rX4ww co V) m oo ouccoo 000 r r rn a H H z z z z z z o z z z 00 Ln cr cif cil cif 0 y4 �-4 W mco HHHHHHzHHH Nrw o P H L9 vlm PE EPPEHHHHE -LEa 00 a% r- CI1 C!]to L HH (x FC; W w 4444<<Q<4 FCC w ri o o W W W co Fl 7 W H m Cz, r=, CL l4 a' a C4 04 0 0. C W riNr -i zzz r HH H Ul O oo W WwW W WHW W W M o O 0 H H H Ln H P Fc O m x x Lao QI Q, ai al 04 D 0! al al d' 0 0 0 w w w r D D a N a s O o 0 0 0 o m o o o r H H H U U Ln PPP r14 ww zz Cd zzz r-4 ww HH w 000 xxx as zz III � ��� cc v zz H aaa www ww H co PEaH 114 04P� 04 D4 O xx H xrxx DDD a a Zz� 0000000000 z 000 Wco >4 >4 w 00v0vU00vU w a a a FC rC rt c c > m W PQ W ��� 040404 ww a H Eacom HE-+E -L WW L7 H 4 c 00 ou g 1RqgRqRqRqR xxxxxxxxxx E - i 3 H Q QQ WWW W CQ Q < < toW w aaa EiE +H 4 E4 Ea W H Wrz, 0000000000 R; HHH 1:4 a Q X U] WUl VlC!1 V]UlVlCll Vl xxx E E4P 14 �Z rC 0 W \ u]m Ulu]vlvlv]vlvlulUlvl 00U tnCQ HH x Ey x as DDDDDDDDDD w as 4 H U as rxaaaxxaaxx 1 xxx a 04 04 c � 33 > +N���7H+ -q� >4 � 00 OOOO 0000 Ln Ln mw OI mm 00 44 d' LO Ln -1 OHHHH r Cl) w r w O 1010 Ln LO C> (D Hl00 Ln r- r- NLn d• d' OO Ln Ln OLn� 0(A ri MW VM0W 00M M NN 0\00 NO HO Lnr rr (M d HH 00 NN to 01 Ln N Ln IO O I;v N N Lf) m H d' Ln M M N Lo IO Ln M 1 .0 N H d' d' co Ln M N N 00 0 a0 (N r 0 H r O M M LO d' N Ln M Ol LO LO (N N H l0 V)- H i/? N ko ko r d' N u V). �D w ri H 0l d' d' H L? M i? t? L]- L? L)• i? r d' i/} . , V)} I I i? i? 4 L } L} L} r r H N l0 l0 H cr L} V)- Ln yr zir tp H H HH HriH H HH H ri H H HHHHHHHHHH \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ 01 al dl 01mm m mm a\ m m Ol Ol m m O10% Ol 0) m 0) m 0) 0 0OO 000 0 00 0 0 0 00 oOOOOOOOOO O o O 0 O o 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o► 0 O O o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O o 0 o O O o 0 o O 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O o 0 00 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H N m W Ln to r co m O to to to l0 w w W to r r n r n r n r n r n r n r n r n r n r n l0 * 1 10 * l0 -k l0 * to * to * l0 * to k to * l0 * l0 v l0 v to v to v l0 v l0 v to v l0 v l0 v to v H O a x U W x U w E� Q x U W x U O z x U W x U a� rn Ln 0) 0 0 0 0 N P4 w �r a x U W x U a H U z O U 41 .ct. l0 d' O Cl) LO O co N m N L_ l0 O O Ol d O L— O O 0 m l0 M N O M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l0 dl dl O dl l0 M d' l0 O� d' M N Lfl ci LO M O L— Ol m Ln (Y" m N lD G% 0) L- L? V/ - l0 c0 co N r- V)- l0 (n N M th H W 10 L1l O 1� li O O � m L)- Ln r H N c-4 N L} Ln V Q w v x w H H z r z H H w � w z n v H H O W L7 r 11 m a4 y , a w H a o 64 H W C4 < H 9 Q W < Z H 3 z 9 w rn H O r U H ° �a cn H w a v H m cn rx � H m w O O O O Ln O O rl H N N Ln H m d' L(1 co N d' r N co q q Q Q Q Q z Q z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z �) z z z�D r14 rTl rr� rTl w r�4 w w w r=. r:4 w w TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: City of Shakopee SUBJECT: Vacation of Portion of Research Boulevard Right -of -Way MEETING DATE: September 19, 2000 Introduction: As a part of the plat of ADC FIRST ADDITION right -of -way has been dedicated for a new street to be known as Broadband Boulevard. This renders Research Boulevard unnecessary. As a result the City Council agreed to initiate the vacation of this portion of right -of -way. Alternatives: 1. Approve Resolution No. 5414, a resolution of the City of Shakopee approving the vacation of a portion of Research Drive subject to an easement being retained over the entire area for drainage and utility purposes. 2. Deny the proposed vacation. 3. Table the decision to allow staff or the applicant time to provide additional information. 1 1 1 iTUMV xK03 13 'I 1 The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed vacation at its meeting of September 7, 2000, and recommended approval of the vacation. Action Requested: Approve Resolution No. 5414, a resolution of the City of Shakopee approving the vacation of a portion of Research Drive subject to an easement being retained over the entire area for drainage and utility purposes. R. Michael Leek Community Development Director gAcc\2000 \0919 \vacresearch.doc 1 1 ROW11RUN • RESOLUTTON OF CI OF 1 VACATING •' BOULEVARD WITHIN THE OF I' ADDITION, OF ; . 1 PEE, SCOTT COUNTY, WHEREAS, it has been made to appear to the Shakopee City Council that the right -of -way described below, serves no public use or interest; Research Boulevard as dedicated in VALLEYPARKFIRSTADDI770N, City of Shakopee , Scott County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the public hearing to consider the action to vacate was held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall in the City of Shakopee at 7:00 P.M. on the 19P day of September, 2000; and WHEREAS, two weeks published notice was given in the SHAKOPEE VALLEYNEWS and by posting such notice on the bulletin boards on the main floor of the Scott County Courthouse, at the U.S. Post Office, at the Shakopee Public Library, and in the Shakopee City Hall; and WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard on the matter were given an opportunity to be heard at the public hearing in the Council Chambers in the City of Shakopee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITT OF / ' 11 1 1. That it finds and determines that the vacation hereinafter described is in the public interest; and 2. That the right -of -way described above serves no further public purpose. 3. That the right -of -way as described above is hereby vacated subject to the following condition: a. That a drainage and utility easement be retained over the described right -of -way. 4. After the adoption of the Resolution, the City Clerk shall file certified copies hereof with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Scott County. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, Held the day of 1 2000. Jon P. Brekke, Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk PREPARED BY: City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 I, Judith S. Cox, City Clerk of the City of Shakopee, N Imnesota, do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 5414, presented to and adopted by the City Council of the City of Shakopee at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the 19' day of September, 2000, as shown by the minutes of the meeting in my possession. Dated this day of , 2000 Judith S. Cox, City Clerk M2 To: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator From: Mark McQuillan, Natural Resource Director Subj ect: Tree Preservation Ordinance Date: September 14, 2000 INTRODUCTION The City Council is asked to review and discuss the proposed Tree Preservation Ordinance. BACKGROUND In December of 1999, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to look at developing a stronger and more comprehensive Tree Preservation Ordinance for the City of Shakopee. In March of this year, I was assigned the responsibility to work with Planning Commission in the development of this ordinance. Here is a brief review of events in chronological order. • On May 18, 2000 the Planning Commission reviewed the initial draft of the proposed ordinance. The ordinance was modeled after the City of Eagan. The Planning Commission continued the Public Hearing of the draft ordinance to their June 22 meeting. They also recommended to the City Council to hire a consultant to work with staff in drafting the ordinance. • On June 6, 2000 the City Council approved the hiring the Kunde Company for consulting services. • On June 22, 2000 the Planning Commission continued the Public Hearing to July 20 to allow more time for staff to collect input from developers and the public. • On July 20, 2000 staff, again, requested the Planning Commission to continue the hearing to the next available meeting (August 17 - no PC meeting was held on August 6) so staff could meet with Mr. Steve Soltau of Shakopee Crossings to discuss his concerns with the draft ordinance and tour his property (on July 11). • On August 17, 2000 the Planning Commission reviewed the revised draft and continued the public hearing to a Special Meeting on August 29 to discuss only the tree ordinance. The meeting lasted four hours from 7:30 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. The Planning Commission also closed the public hearing and recommended the draft ordinance be forwarded to the City Council. The motion failed to win approval due to a lack of majority vote (3 -3). The PC directed staff to prepare another revised draft for their review for the Sept. 7 Planning Commission Meeting. • On September 7, 2000 the Planning Commission tabled the tree ordinance to September 12 special meeting. On September 12, 2000 the Planning Commission, on a 3 -3 vote, failed to recommend the approval of the draft ordinance to the City Council. Commissioner Mars, Willard and Houser voted in the affirmative and Commissioners Gillick, Joos and Romansky voted in the negative. Commissioner Meilleur was absent. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A is the draft ordinance presented to the Planning Commission with the requested changes. Exhibit D is the current tree preservation ordinance. ACTION REQUESTED The City Council is asked to discuss the proposed draft ordinance and provide further direction to staff. To City Council 9 -19 -00 �Fh b,f'y" FINDINGS AND PURPOSE STATEMENT: The City of Shakopee finds it is in the best interest of the community to protect, preserve, and enhance the natural environment of the community and to encourage a resourceful, and prudent approach to the development and alteration of wooded areas. In the interest of achieving these objectives, the City of Shakopee has established the comprehensive tree preservation regulations herein to promote the furtherance of the following: A. Protection and preservation of the environment and natural beauty of the city; B. Assurance of orderly development within wooded areas to minimize tree and habitat loss, C. Allows for the evaluation of specific sites as to the development's impact on trees and wooded areas, D. Establishment of minimal standards for tree preservation and the mitigation of environmental impacts resulting from tree removal; E. Provision of incentives for creative land use and environmentally compatible site design which preserves trees and minimizes tree removal and clear - cutting during development; and F. Enforcement of tree preservation standards to promote and protect the public health, safety and welfare of the community. ll _ W W MIND" A. The following terms shall be defined as stated: A. Applicant means any person or entity, which is required to submit and implement an approved tree preservation plan under this section. B. Builder means any person or entity to which a building permit is issued for the construction of a single- family residence. C. Caliper inch means the diameter of replacement trees measured at a height of one foot above the ground level. D. Construction area means any area in which movement of earth, alteration in topography, soil compaction, disruption of vegetation, change in soil chemistry, or any other change in the natural character of the land occurs as a result of the site preparation, grading, building construction or any other construction activity. E. Critical root zone (CRZ) means an imaginary circle surrounding the tree trunk with a radius distance of one foot per one inch of tree diameter, e.g., a 20 -inch diameter tree has a CRZ with a radius of 20 feet. F. Developer means any person or entity other than a builder, as defined herein, who undertakes to improve a parcel of land, by platting, grading, installing utilities, or constructing or improving any building thereon. G. Development means individual lot single - family and multi- residential, commercial and industrial developments occurring during single -phase and two -phase developments, as those terms are defined herein. K Diameter means the length of a straight line measured through the trunk of a tree at 54 inches above the ground. L Diameter inch means the diameter, in inches, of a tree measured at diameter breast height (4.5 feet from the uphill side of the existing ground level). J Drip line means the farthest distance away from the trunk that rain or dew will fall directly to the ground from the leaves or branches of the tree. K. Forester means a person holding a bachelor's degree in forestry from an accredited four -year college of forestry. L. Individual lot single-family residence development means the process where the construction of a new single- family residence occurs on a single lot, or the expansion of any existing single - family residence by ten percent or greater square feet. M. Landscape architect means a person licensed by the state as a landscape architect. N. Land Alteration means excavation, grading, clearing, filling or other earth change that may result in: a. The movement of more than three hundred fifty (350) cubic yards of earth where significant trees are present, or b. Any alteration of land of more than one foot from the natural contour of the ground on any contiguous four hundred in square feet of ground where significant trees are present, or c. Any cutting or killing of more than twenty (20) percent of the significant trees on any land within a period of five years. O. Forest Stand means a contiguous group of tress sufficiently uniform in species composition arrangement of age classes, and condition to be a distinguishable unit. P. Natural Resource Director means the designated City official responsible for the management of natural resources in the City of Shakopee. Q. Significant woodland means a grouping or cluster of coniferous trees over four feet in hqjgbj and/or deciduous trees between four inches and 12 inches in diameter with contiguous crown cover, occupyingLOa 1000 or more square feet of property zoned RR R -lA R -1B R -1C R -2 or PRD (b) 1500 or more square feet of property zoned R -3. B- 1 or BP or (c) 2000 square feet or more of property zoned for commercial or industrial use. R Single-phase development means the process where improvement of the entire site occurs in one continuing process. Single -phase development can include initial site grading; installation of utilities, construction of public streets; construction and grading of drainage -ways; filling of any areas; grading of the pad area; utility hookups; construction of buildings, parking lots, driveways, storage areas, recreation areas, private streets; and any other activity within the construction area. 2 S. Coniferous evergreen tree means a woody plant that is, at least, twelve feet or more in height and has foliage on the outermost portion of the branches year round. T. Deciduous tree means a woody plant which, at maturity, is at least 15 feet or more in height, having a defined crown, and which sheds leaves annually. U. Hardwood deciduous tree includes, but not limited to, ironwood, catalpa, oak, maple (hard), walnut, ash, hickory, birch, black cherry, hackberry, locust and basswood. V. Significant tree means a healthy tree measuring a minimum of six inches in diameter for hardwood deciduous trees, defined herein, or a minimum of 12 inches in diameter for softwood deciduous trees, as defined herein, or a minimum of 12 feet in height for coniferous /evergreen trees. W. Softwood deciduous trees are: weed, poplars, aspen bex °'a°r, T * - , silver maple and elm. X. Specimen tree means a healthy hardwood deciduous tree measuring equal to or greater than 30 inches diameter and/or a coniferous tree measuring 50 feet or greater in height. Y. Two-phase development means the process where improvement of the entire site occurs in at least two distinct phases. Generally the first phase includes initial site grading; installation of utilities; construction of public streets; construction, grading of drainage -ways; and filling of any areas. The second phase generally includes grading of specific pad areas; utility hookups; construction of buildings, parking lots, driveways, storage areas, recreation areas, private streets; and any other activity within the specific construction zone. � B. Concept Plan: Prior to the application for a preliminary plat, building permit, excavation permit, grading permit, or any other City approval which results in land alteration as defined under A N shall be considered unless the applicant for such approval has first obtained a tree preservation permit. The tree preservation permit shall include a concept plan or sketch illustrating the general site layout, including streets, ponding, and building sites. In considering tree preservation, the following concepts should include: 1. Identify forest stands and specimen trees (determined through required tree inventory). 2. Locate roads, building footprints, parking areas, storm -water basins and Utilities so as to minimize their impact on significant trees. 3. Preserve trees in groves or clusters recognizing that survivability is greater for groups of trees than for individuals. 4. Manipulate proposed grading and the limits of disturbance by changing the elevation/location of building pads, parking lot and streets, and consider the use of retaining walls to reduce the impact of trees. 5. Review all construction factors that influence tree survivability. 3 i : , ` $ w�a C. Tree Preservation Plan. 1. Scope of application A. The tree preservation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the city and implemented in accordance therewith in connection with any of the following: a. New development in any zoning district; b. New building construction in any zoning district; c. Expansion of any existing commercial, industrial or institutional building or impervious surface by ten percent or greater square feet, where an approved tree preservation plan is not on file with the city; d. Any project requiring a grading permit and e. Any land alteration as defined in SectionA N(Land Alterations) f Excludes existing single - family residences desiring to remodel or expand existing buildings or grounds. 2. Application Requirements - A. An application for a tree preservation permit shall be made in writing to the Natural Resources Director on a form provided by the City. The requirements are outline in Section C 3 & 4. B. The application for a tree preservation permit shall be required along with application for preliminary plat. Approval shall be given based upon the following: a. Approval by the City's designated agent or employee; b. Payment of the application fee; c. Provision of the security as required by Section C -9. d. Substantial likelihood the applicant will be able to comply with rules and regulations of this Chapter. C. On individual single- family lots with existing significant trees or woodlands as identified by the City, a Tree Preservation Plan, as described in Section C 3 & 4, herein, shall be submitted for review by City staff in conjunction with a building permit. 3. Submission Requirements A. A certificate of survey that accurately identifies the location and types of all existing trees and woodlands to be removed and those to be preserved on the lot or plat. The drawing shall illustrate where n protection devices will be placed and areas to be used for material and equipment storage. B . A Tree Inventory shall be prepared by a forester of landscape architect to identify tree species and woodlands. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to retain a forester or landscape architect to conduct an on site inventory and field assessment of the property for the tree preservation plan. C. The proposed grading plan shall be submitted to the city at least five (5) working days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved tree preservation plan. D_ All sites shall be staked, as depicted in the approved grading plan, and the required tree protection fencing shall be installed before grading is e.� a to commence. E. The city shall inspect the construction site prior to the beginning of the grading to ensure that protective fencing and other protective measures are in place. F. No encroachment, grading, trenching, filling, compaction, or change in soil chemistry shall occur within the fenced areas protecting the critical root zone of the trees to be saved. G. Applicants of new single - family residential building permits are required to prepare an individual lot tree preservation plan when significant tree, specimen trees, and /or significant woodlands exist on site. Tree preservation plans for individual lots will be required to have the plan prepared by a forester or landscape architect_ 4. Tree Preservation Plan Requirements. A. All applicants shall submit a tree preservation plan prepared in accordance with the provisions of this subdivision. The tree preservation plan shall include the following information: B. The name(s), telephone number(s), and address (es) of applicants, property owners, developers and /or builders; C. Delineation of the buildings, structures, or impervious surfaces situated thereon or contemplated to be built thereon; D. Delineation of all areas to be graded and limits of land disturbance; E. A tree inventory, by a forester or landscape architect, depicting the size, species, and location of all existing significant trees, specimen trees, and significant woodlands located within the area to be platted or within the parcel of record. These significant trees, specimen trees, and significant woodlands should be identified in both graphic and tabular form; F. Identification of all significant trees, specimen trees, and significant woodlands proposed to be removed within the construction area. These significant trees, specimen trees, and significant woodlands should be identified in both graphic and tabular form; G. Measures to protect significant trees, specimen trees, and significant woodlands; 5 H. Size, species, and location of all replacement trees proposed to be planted on the property in accordance with the tree replacement schedule; and Signature of the person(s) preparing the plan. 5 . Mitigation A. In any development that the tree /woodland allowable removal limits are exceeded, the applicant shall mitigate the tree loss by one of the following methods: Q e ith reforestation of (tree replacement) appropriate areas within the development area or affected parcel in accordance with the tree replacement schedule; (ii) tree replacement in accordance with the tree replacement schedule on other property owned by the applicant in the City; (iii) tree replacement in accordance with the tree replacement schedule on public property owned by the City; or iv payment to the City of the sum per diameter inch calculated from the total amount of diameter inches of the required replacement trees in accordance with the tree replacement schedule. B. The fee per diameter inch shall be set forth in the city fee schedule, and the payment thereon shall be deposited into an account designated specifically for tree mitigation. C. The form of mitigation to be provided by the applicant shall be determined by the city, after consultation with the applicant. The planting of trees for mitigation shall be in addition to other landscaping requirements of the city. D. Significant tree replacements will be calculated by replacing the largest diameter tree first, proceeding down to the smallest diameter significant tree. 6. Required Protective Measures A. The tree preservation plan shall identify and require the following measures to be utilized to protect significant trees, specimen trees, and significant woodlands: a. Installation of snow fencing or polyethylene laminate safety netting placed at the drip line or at the perimeter of the critical root zone (CRZ), whichever is greater, of significant trees, specimen trees, and significant woodlands to be preserved. No grade change, construction activity, or storage of materials shall occur within this fenced area. b. Identification of any oak trees requiring pruning between April 15 and July 1. Any oak trees so pruned shall be required to have any cut areas sealed with an appropriate nontoxic tree wound sealant immediately after damage occurs. If cutting or 0 pruning of oak trees is to take place between April fifteenth and July first, the applicant shall provide a disease prevention plan within the tree preservation plan. c. Prevention of change in soil chemistry due to concrete washout and leakage or spillage of toxic materials, such as fuels or paints. Washout areas are to be identified on plans and signage of areas provided on construction site. 7. Additional Protective Measures A. The City suggests the following tree protection measures for significant trees, specimen trees, and significant woodlands intended to be preserved according to the tree preservation plan. a. Installation of retaining walls or tree wells to preserve trees. b. Placement of utilities, where possible, in common trenches outside of the drip line of significant trees, or use of tunneled installation. c. Use of tree root aeration, fertilization, and /or irrigation systems. d. Transplanting of young trees to a protected area for later moving into permanent sites within the construction area. e. Therapeutic pruning. 8. Review Process — Conditions of Permit A. The review process for the tree preservation plan begins with a Concept Plan as outline in Section B. B. Approval of the tree preservation is contingent of meeting the requirements outline under Section C 2 & 3. C. During the construction phases, the City's designated representative may enter upon private premises at any reasonable time for the purposes of carrying out the duties assigned in this Chapter. No person shall unreasonably hinder, prevent or delay City's representative while engaged in the execution or enforcement of his /her duties prior, during or after project approval. 9. Performance Guarantee A. Any applicant of a new development shall provide the required performance prior to the approval or issuance of any construction and /or grading permits. The amount of the performance guarantee to be submitted, specific to the tree preservation fulfillments, shall be calculated as follows: a. For construction on previously platted vacant lots, the developer or builder shall provide a performance guarantee in escrow of $1000 per lot. If damages exceed $1000, the developer/builder can be assessed additional charges by multiplying the total diameter inches of significant trees and specimen trees to be preserved by the rate of payment of 7 $25.00 per diameter inch and the total square feet of significant woodlands to be preserved by the rate of $1.20 per square foot. b. The performance guarantee will be released upon verification by the city that the tree preservation plan was followed and all such requirements have been met_ No performance guarantee shall be released earlier than one year after the date of the project closure. 10. Removal of Diseased Trees Required A. Prior to any grading, all diseased, hazardous, and nuisance trees on the subject property shall be identified by the city forester, tree inspector or designated agent of the City of Shakopee in accordance with the tree disease control and prevention regulations of the City Code. Any and all diseased and nuisance trees so identified shall be removed from the property, at the time of grading, if so directed. 11. Compliance With Plan A. The applicant shall implement the tree preservation plan prior to and during any construction. The tree protection measures shall remain in place until all grading and construction activity is terminated, or until a request is made to and approved by a city forester or designated agent of the City. B. No significant trees, specimen trees, or significant woodlands shall be removed until a tree preservation plan is approved and except in accordance with the approved tree preservation plan as approved by the city. If a significant tree(s), specimen tree(s) or any significant woodland that was intended to be preserved is removed without permission of the city forester /agent or damaged so that it is in a state of decline within one year from date of project closure, a cash mitigation, calculated per diameter inch of the removed /destroyed tree or per total square foot of significant woodlands, in the amount set forth in the city fee schedule, shall be remitted to the city. C. The city shall have the right to inspect the development and /or building site in order to determine compliance with the approved tree preservation plan. The city shall determine whether compliance with the tree preservation plan has been met. D. Tree removal allowance. 1. Specimen tree, significant tree, and significant woodland removal shall be in accordance with the city- approved tree preservation plan and in no case shall the amount of removal exceed the following percentages: SINGLE LOT DEVELOPMENT 1. Single -unit residential, 20 percent. 2. Commercial, Industrial, Major Recreation, Public Projects, and multiunit residential, 38 35 percent. MULTI -LOT DEVELOPMENT 1. Single -phase development process. a. Single unit residential, 45 percent. b. Commercial Industrial. Major Recreation, Public Projects and multiunit residential, -58 60 percent. 2. Two -phase development. a. Initial site development, 25 percent. b. Individual lot development. aa. Single unit residential, 20 percent. bb. Commercial Industrial, Major Recreation Public Projects, or multiunit residential, 2-5 35 percent. E. Replacement and Location of Trees 1. Size of Tree Damaged or Destroyed - Number of Replacement Trees. Category A/Category B / Category C Coniferous, 12' to 24' high 1 2 4 Coniferous, 24' or higher 2 4 8 Hardwood deciduous, 6" to 20" diameter 1 2 4 Hardwood deciduous, 21" to 30" diameter 2 4 8 Specimen Tree (Hardwood Deciduous), greater than 3 0 " 3 6 12 . ...... . ..... UT. Mor 1 M-NOMM 4 Softwood deciduous, greater than 24 " 2 4 8 - - :, : E. Replacement and Location of Trees 1. Size of Tree Damaged or Destroyed - Number of Replacement Trees. Category A/Category B / Category C Coniferous, 12' to 24' high 1 2 4 Coniferous, 24' or higher 2 4 8 Hardwood deciduous, 6" to 20" diameter 1 2 4 Hardwood deciduous, 21" to 30" diameter 2 4 8 Specimen Tree (Hardwood Deciduous), greater than 3 0 " 3 6 12 Softwood deciduous, 12" to 24 " diameter 1 2 4 Softwood deciduous, greater than 24 " 2 4 8 2. Significant woodland replacement. Where replacement of a significant woodland is required, the applicant shall be responsible for furnishing and installing one category A replacement tree or two category B replacement trees or four category C replacement trees for every 125 square feet of significant woodland damaged or destroyed, or any increment thereof. Size of replacement trees. Catego1y A trees shall be no less than the following sizes: Deciduous trees, not less than 3.5 inches in diameter. Coniferous trees, not less than 10 feet in height. Category B trees shall be no less than the following sizes: Deciduous trees, not less than 2 1 /2 inches in diameter. Coniferous trees, not less than six feet in height. Category C trees shall be no less than the following sizes: Deciduous trees, not less than 1 /2 inches in diameter. Coniferous trees, not less than four feet in height. Species requirement. a. Where ten or more replacement trees are required, not more than 50 percent of the replacement trees shall be of the same species of tree without the approval of the city. 2. Warranty requirement. a. Any replacement tree which is not alive or healthy, as determined by the city, or which subsequently dies due to construction activity within one year after the date of project closure shall be removed by the applicant and replaced with a new healthy tree meeting the same minimum size requirements within eight months of removal. 3. Replacement and location. a. Trees subject to replacement pursuant to this section shall be in addition to landscape requirements by City Code. i. Replacement trees shall be planted in one or more of the following areas on land: Restoration areas including slopes, out -lots or common areas, buffer zones between different land uses and /or activities, project entrance areas, and public areas. 4. Replacement trees shall be of a species similar to the trees which are lost or removed and shall include those species referred by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Native Tree Species List M-Pi 10 §11.60 At least one (1) landscape island with a minimum width of nine (9) feet and a minimum area of 100 square feet shall be constructed for every 4,000 square feet of paved area in a parking facility. Landscape islands with an area of 200 square feet or more shall be treated as two (2) islands for purposes of this provision. Entrances to a parking facility and loading areas shall not be included in the calculation of paved area in a parking facility. (Ord. 487, July 10, 1997) 2. Landscape islands shall contain at least one overstory deciduous tree of a minimum two (2) inch diameter trunk at the time of planting. 3. Landscape islands shall be curbed and of sufficient size to allow the healthy growth of the chosen tree species. The island shall be at least nine ((9) feet wide and at least 100 square feet in area. 4. Landscaping provided in parking facilities may be used to meet the landscaping requirements. E. If healthy landscaping of acceptable species exists on a site prior to development, the Zoning Administrator may allow credit for such landscaping in meeting the requirements of this subdivision, if it is left in good condition. One (1) unit of mature existing landscaping may be credited as two (2) units of new landscaping. Each existing mature hardwood tree may be credited as three (3) units. F. All landscaping shall be properly maintained and any dead or diseased material shall be removed and replaced with material meeting the requirements of this section. The City shall require submission of a landscaping bond in an amount equal to 115% of the value of the landscaping to ensure compliance with this section during the first year after planting. Subd. 9. Tree and Woodland Preservation. The following standards shall apply to all residential development for which a building permit is issued after the effective date of this Chapter. A. Structures, driveways, and parking facilities shall be located in such a manner that the maximum number of trees shall be preserved. No tree exceeding sic (6) inches in diameter at a height of six (6) feet above ground shall be removed without permission from the City. A person seeking permission to remove any protected tree shall demonstrate that there are no feasible or prudent alternatives to the cutting of trees on the site and shall propose a reforestation plan. Reforestation and landscaping shall utilize a variety of tree species and shall not utilize any species presently under disease epidemic. Species planted shall be hardy under local conditions and compatible with the local landscape. E. All development activities, including grading and contouring, shall take place in such a manner that the root zone aeration stability of existing trees shall not be affected and shall provide existing trees with a watering area equal to a minimum of one -half the crown area. page revised in 1997 1324 .• C. Notwithstanding the above, the removal of diseased trees, or trees seriously damaged by storms or other acts of God, shall be permitted. A. Exterior lighting shall be designed and constructed to limit direct illumination and glare upon or into any other lot or street. Reflected glare or spill light shall not exceed five- tenths footcandle as measured on the property line when abutting any residential lot and one footcandle on any property line abutting a business or industrial lot. Street lights installed in public right -of -way and lights in City parks shall be excepted from these standards. B. Mitigative measures shall be employed to limit glare and spill light to protect neighboring lots and to maintain traffic safety on streets. These measures shall include lenses, shields, lowers, prismatic control devices, and limitations on the height and type of fixtures. The City also may limit the hours of operation of outdoor lighting if it is deemed necessary to reduce impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. C. No flickering or flashing lights shall be permitted except where required by the Federal Aviation Administration. D. Direct off -site views of the light source shall be blocked or screened except for globe or ornamental light fixtures, which may be approved when it can be demonstrated that the off -site impacts stemming from direct views of the light source are mitigated by the fixture design or location. E. The City may require submission of a light distribution plan if deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the intent of this Chapter. F. In any industry zone, light may spill from one (1) lot to any other lot provided that it does not extend beyond the boundaries of the industry zone. A. Noises emanating from any use shall be in compliance with City Code Section 10.60, and shall not exceed any standards set by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. S. Any use established or remodeled after the effective date of this Chapter shall be so operated as to prevent vibration discernable at any point beyond the lot line of the site on which such use is located. C. Ground vibration and noise caused by trains, aircraft operations, temporary construction or demolition, or vehicles other than those involved in a major commercial recreation use or on private property shall be exempt from these regulations. Subd. 12. Smoke and Particulate Matter. No use shall produce or emit smoke, dust, or particulate matter exceeding applicable regulations established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. page revised in 1997 1325 N, September 17,2004 Mr. Ion Brckke. Mayor City of Shakopee - Dear Mayor Brckkc, 1 am writing to strongly urge you to approve the Trec Ordinance being submitted for discussion at your ScpL 19'' council meeting I understand the planning commissions vote of 3/3 at their workshop last week is not a clear mandate. However, after listening to 3 '/2 hours of discussion at their meting several weeks ago, I believe they are very concerned and interested in having a tree ordinance. It may not be a perfect ordinance, but can certainly be tweaked when necessary. Its a pro-activc approach to a situation that Shakopee has long ignored. I'm sorry that Terry loos of the Planning Commission feels that saving trees in Shakopee is just a "Dean Lakc" issue. There are many citi»ens in this city, including myself, that feel very strongly about our environment and arc not willing to allow developers to have a free hand in deciding the fait of our cnviromnent Please cast vour vote for our environment and not for the developers who are here today and gone tommorrow. N Shakopee is going to retain arty quality of life, something must be dune Pm- Thank hank you for your consideration of this matter Sincerely, lark DuBois cc Councilors Deb Amundson Gary Morke Clete Link Bob Sweeney '000M ARNA September 12, 2000 Mr. Steven Soltau Shakopee Crossings 3601 Minnesota Drive, Suite 880 Bloomington, MN 55435 STS Consultants, Ltd. Solutions through Science & Engineering Re: Proposed Revisions to Tree Preservation Ordinance; STS Project 97905 -XA Dear Mr. Soltau: STS Consultants, Ltd. (STS) has completed review of the proposed tree preservation ordinance being considered by the Shakopee Planning Commission as you requested. The following comments are provided, along with recommended changes to the ordinance so that it better meets the stated purposes of tree preservation found within the proposed ordinance. The remainder of this letter will follow the order of the ordinance as currently drafted, so that the requested changes can be inserted in an efficient manner. Definitions Insert a definition for exempt trees. The exempt tree species shall include cottonwood o ulus deltoides , box elder Acer ne do , and willow (Salix species . Exempt trees also includes trees not found on the list of trees native to Minnesota, see attached. Dead or severely damaged, and unsafe trees should also be exempt from regulation. Also include a definition for exempt activities. Exempt activities should include the movement of more than three hundred fifty (350) cubic yards of earth for the purposes of environmental remediation Cleanup of a spill or leak of toxic or hazardous materials should not require adherence with these regulations, as it will prevent the timely remediation of contamination. Exempt activities should also include clearing for the purposes of developing or maintaining a survey line, and earth changes required for the maintenance of existing drainage facilities. Exempt activities should include tree removal for the purposes of harvest, either for wood products, pulp, or fuel. Coniferous evergreen tree definition should be changed to indicate conifers found on the list of trees native to Minnesota (see attached) that are at least 12 feet or more in height. The definitions for hardwood deciduous tree, softwood deciduous tree and Coniferous tree should specify the list of trees native to Minnesota (see attached). Significant woodland definition should include the following: Exemption from this definition can be granted if the woody vegetation is largely comprised of invasive, non -native sp ecies such as Buckthorn (Rhamus spp.) 10900 73rd Avenue North, Suite 150 . Maple Grove,- MN 55369 -5547 . (763) 315 -6300 . (763) 315 -1836 Fax Shakopee Crossings STS Project 97905 -XA September 12, 2000 Page 2 0 ; Significant tree definition should read as follows: Significant tree means a healthy tree measuring a minimum of 6 inches in diameter for hardwood deciduous trees native to Minnesota, defined herein, or a minimum of 12 inches in diameter for softwood deciduous trees native to Minnesota, as defined herein, or a minimum of 12 feet in height for coniferous trees native to Minnesota; as defined herein. The ordinance should only apply to the trees native to Minnesota. A copy of a Native Tree List provided by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is provided attached to this letter. Tree Preservation Plan In part 3 of the submission requirements, subpart 8, replace "a certificate of survey that accurately identifies ..." with "a drawing that illustrates ... ". Rationale: A certificate of survey is a specific level of illustration quality that in many cases can be cost prohibitive to provide. We do not believe that the additional level of tree preservation provided by a certificate of survey warrants the additional cost. A diagram prepared by a forester or landscape architect would be required to have sufficient detail and accuracy for inventory purposes. A certificate of survey will not add significant value to the drawing. In subpart g, the ordinance will require applicants for single family residential building permits to have a forester or landscape architect prepare individual tree preservation plans. This provision places undue emphasis on small lot developments, where the total magnitude of impacts are likely to be small. In addition, residential lot landscaping often results in replanting of considerable quantities of trees, making this provision superfluous. Mitigation In part 5, subpart A, the ordinance should be revised that the applicant shall mitigate the tree loss by " one or a combination of the following methods ". In addition, mitigation should allow for (part A, subpart iv) payment to the City or an established conservation organization acceptable to the City of the sum per diameter inch calculated from the total amount of diameter inches of the required replacement trees in accordance with the tree replacement schedule. Rationale_ Inclusion of this provision will allow funds for tree conservation to be paid either to the City, or to organizations such as the Sierra Club or Nature Conservancy that are more efficient at using funds for preservation of the environmental and natural beauty. If desired, the Shakopee Crossings STS Project 97905 -XA September 12, 2000 Page 3 City can mandate these organizations use the funds within Scott County or the Shakopee City Limits. Allowable Tree Removal Sche In D. Tree Removal Allowance, clarify the context of this allowance by rewording as follows: 1 Specimen tree, significant tree, and significant woodland remova shall be in acc ordance with the City approved tree preservation plan. Tree replacement is required for removal in excess of the following percentages: Rationale: As currently worded, the ordinance would suggest that tree removal over the "Allowance" must never occur. This requirement would impose such a severe economic and spatial impact on future development as to constitute a "taking without just compensation ". The result would be economic opportunity loss to the community as properties become derelict. Allowing the marginal removal percentages defined in Single Lot Development and Multi-Lot Development would allow some community growth to occur, albeit at a great cost. It is appropriate to have different thresholds of allowable tree removal for different land uses and lot development scenarios. The recent redraft of the ordinance allows up to 60% of land clearing for certain land uses which by nature require wholesale removal of trees for property development. If a developer wishes to "clear cut" their property for development, the requirement for a graphic representation (drawing) of trees inventoried should be waived. Total cutting and the full mitigation requirement is adequately covered by a numerical inventory in tabular form. Additional Protective Measures We are pleased to see the City is providing additional suggestions for preserving trees, including placement of utilities in common trenches or through use of tunneled installation. We recommend that the City include these protective measures in the Standard Operating Procedures of Shakopee Public Utility Commission and conduct the appropriate review of permits for utility installation by providers offering gas, electric, or communication utilities. The City should require tree protection Best Management Practices such as protective fencing etc. to be installed prior to utility work within the drip line and/or Critical Root Zone (CRZ) of significant trees, and significant woodlands. Failing to regulate these activities would raise concerns of fairness in regulation. Shakopee Crossings C 6 STS Project 97905 -XA September 12, 2000 Page 4 Tree Replacement Schedule We recommend implementing a cap on tree replacement based on the economic realities of "orderly development within wooded areas" to be more consistent with the findings and purpose statement found in the ordinance. Specifically, the economic burden associated with adherence to the City's tree preservation ordinance should not be allowed to exceed a set percentage of base land value. The calculated diameter inch replacement value for a property should be capped at 5% of the base (unimproved) land value for that property. In the case of low -value property that is densely wooded, it is possible for the economic burdens associated with tree preservation compliance to override the economic factors influencing site improvement. In cases such as this, the tree replacement fee would be 5% of the base land value. The number of diameter inches required for mitigation can be calculated by taking the 5% base land value number and dividing by the City- mandated replacement cost per diameter inch. Adding this provision to the ordinance will allow the orderly development within wooded areas, and promote and protect the welfare of the community economy. It is important to note that protective initiatives fail when economic support is lacking. Therefore, a balance should be sought between the economic realities of property use, and protection of specific environmental conditions. The City should allow tree replacement to occur on "banking" sites, if proposed in the Tree Preservation Plan submitted for a development. These sites can be located on City or County lands, lands set aside by a private parry for a Tree Replacement Bank, or on lands established for this purpose by recognized conservation organizations like the Nature Conservancy. The "pooling" of replacement trees planted on a banking site would allow for a larger woodland to be created. Woodland values are generally increased with greater area of coverage. The banking concept should allow for developers to receive positive incentives for meaningful tree preservation. The City should give tree replacement credit for the total diameter inches of significant trees, and total significant woodland area, set aside in tree preserves. The tree preserves would be established on property owned by the developer and a restrictive covenant filed for protecting the woodland. The City can allow developers planning to remove trees to establish preserves in the next two years. The diameter inch and/or area of significant woodland retained on these preserves could then be applied to future developments requiring tree replacement. For maximum effect, these preserves should be accepted by the City as Parkland Dedication lands so that continued woodland enjoyment can be retained by the community. Shakopee Crossings STS Project 97905 -XA September 12, 2000 Page 5 Other Incentives for Tree Preservation Positive incentives for preserving trees are required, so that the regulated public will seek ways to establish and protect woodlands. One positive incentive is property tax relief. Property taxes on lands affected by this ordinance should be adjusted down as compensation for the additional use restrictions imposed by the ordinance. Corollaries to this incentive exist in the form of the "Native Prairie Tax Exemption Program ", the "Wetland Tax Exemption Program ", the "Minnesota Agricultural Preserve Program (and its Metropolitan form)" and the "Green Acres Program". In each case, tax abatement may be entire, or take the form of a reduction to a lower agricultural -use tax rate. Allowing for tax relief on protected lands is consistent with the stated objectives of the ordinance, and would show good faith in administration of an ordinance that is fair and encourages meaningful preservation of natural beauty in the City of Shakopee. Closing Thank you for considering our recommended revisions to the proposed tree preservation ordinance. The level of input from the community and interested developers indicates the complexity of issues that emerge when attempting to develop regulations that are effective in preserving trees, fair to the regulated public, and workable from an administration standpoint. If you have further questions concerning the recommended revisions, please contact Steve Carlson of STS at 763/315 -6300. Respectfully, STS CONSULTANTS, LTD. Ste L en J. Carlson Project Scientist P obertDeGroot. PG PE Principal Engineer SJC /dn Encs. C605A001.DOC Minnesota's Native Trees Adapted from list provided by Mn DNR Forestry Division and Trees of Minnesota CONIFERS Species name Common Name Notes Abies balsamea Juniperus virginiana Larix laricina Picea glauca Picea mariana Pinus banksiana Pinus resinosa Pinus strobus Thuja occidentalis HARDWOODS Species name Acernegundo Acer nigrum Acer rubrum Acer saccharinum Acer saccharum Acer spicatum Betula alleghaniensis (B. lutea) Betula nigra Betula papyrifera Carpinus caroliniana Carya cordiformis Carya ovata Celts occidentalis Fraxinus americana Fraxinus nigra Fraxinus pennsylvanica Gleditsia tricanthos Gymnocladus dioicus Juglans cinerea Juglans nigra Morus rubra Ostrya virginiana Populus balsamifera Populus deltoides Populus grandidentata Populus tremuloides Prunus pennsylvanica Prunus serotina Balsam Fir Red Cedar Tamarack White Spruce Black (swamp) Spruce Jack (scrub) Pine Red (Norway) Pine White Pine White Cedar, Arborvitae Common Name Box Elder Black Maple Red Maple Silver (soft) Maple Sugar (rock, hard) Maple Mountain Maple Yellow Birch River Birch Paper Birch (white birch) Blue Beech, Hombeam Bittemut (swamp) Hickory Shagbark Hickory Hackberry White Ash Black (swamp) Ash Green (red) Ash Honeylocust Kentucky Coffeetree Butternut Walnut Mulberry Ironwood, Hop Hombeam Balsam Poplar, Balm -of- Gilead (Eastern) Cottonwood Bigtooth /Largetooth Aspen Quaking Aspen Pin Cherry Black Cherry Deciduous Notes See Note 1 below See Note 1 below Quercus alba White Oak Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak Quercus ellipsoidalis Northern Pin (jack) Oak Quercus macrocarpa Burr (scrub) Oak Quercus muehlenbergii Chinkapin (chestnut) Oak Quercus rubra (Northern) Red Oak Quercus velutina Black Oak Salix spp. Willows Sorbus americana Mountain ash Sorbus decora Showy (Northern) Mountain Ash Tilia americana Basswood Ulmus americana American Elm Ulmus fulva Slippery (Red) Elm Ulmus racemosa Rock Elm See Note 1 below Note 1: To be considered exempt from Shakopee's Tree Preservation Ordinance, tends to be short- lived, weak, "nuisance" tree. S'/4- I' Mem TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Notice of Availability and Distribution of a Revised Alternative Urban Area Wide Review (AUAR) Document for Shakopee Crossings E G A : September 19, 2000 Council is asked to consider approving distribution of a revised AUAR document for Shakopee Crossings for the 10 -day review. Council is not being asked to rule on the adequacy of the revised AUAR document at this time. Accompanying this report is a copy of the revised AUAR form, draft responses to the comments that were received, and a proposed mitigation plan. If the Council approves distribution, these will be packaged with the appendices and distributed to the reviewing agencies. If there no objection is filed during the review period, the neat action by the City Council would be to adopt the revised AUAR document. Action Requested: - Offer and pass a motion to authorize publication of notice in the "EQB Monitor" and distribution of the revised AUAR for Shakopee Crossings for final review and. R. Michael Leek Community Development Director AUARNoticeShakCross/W9U IV OISM 1.1 IFIII ' - i IVI Wfl ' E- 016 1 1f10 la City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (952) 445 -3650 Shakopee Crossings Alternative Urban Areawide Review (Revised AU (Recent modifications from the EQB to the requirements on this form pertinent to the AUAR process are in italics) I This guidance is based on the items of the standard EAW form (June 1995 version); the numbers listed below refer to the item numbers of that form. Except where stated otherwise, the information requested here is intended to augment (or clarify) the requested information on the EAW form. Therefore, the EAW form and the guidance booklet EAW Guidelines must be read along with this guidance. Except where the responses are identical, the information requested must be supplied for each of the major development scenarios being analyzed, and it is important to clearly explain the differences in impacts between the various scenarios. If this guidance indicates that an EAW item is not applicable to the AUAR, the item number and its title (the text in bold print on the EAW form) should be included with a notation that the EQB guidance indicates that no response is necessary in an AUAR (as opposed to just skipping reference to that item at all). One general rule that should be kept in mind throughout the preparation of the AUAR document is that whenever a certain impact may or may not occur, depending on the exact design of future developments, the AUAR should cover the possible impacts through a "worst case scenario" analysis or else prevent the impacts through the provisions of the mitigation plan. Failure to cover possible impacts by one of these means risks the invalidation of the environmental review exemption for specific development projects. Document format. If the RGU wishes to reorganize the AUAR content into a format other than that of the EAW form, it may do so, provided that a cross - reference index is supplied that informs the reader where the response(s) to each of the EAW items can be found (identifying the page(s) or specific section(s)). Revised Alternative n Areawide Review (Revised AUAIJ For Shakopee Crossings 1. Project Title. Shakopee Crossings 2. Project Proposer. Shakopee Crossings LP Contact: Steven Soltau Address: 3601 Minnesota Drive, Suite 880 Bloomington, MN 55435 Phone: 612 -921 -5806 Fax: 612 -445 -6718 3. Responsible Governmental Unit GU). City of Shakopee, Minnesota Contact: R Michael Leer Community Development Director Address: 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone: 952- 445 -3650 Fax: 952 -445 -6718 4. Reason for EAW Preparation (technically not applicable to AUAR) a 5. Project Location. Sections: 12 and 13, Township 115, Range 22 The project area is located in the southwest portion of the Minneapolis -St. Paul Metropolitan Area, within the eastern portion of the City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota. State Highway No. 169 and the Minnesota River are north of the property. The cities of Bloomington and Eden Prairie are north of the Minnesota River. East of the property is Stagecoach Road, which runs north - south, and the City of Savage. Immediately south of the property is proposed County Road No. 21 and undeveloped land. Further south is the City of Prior Lake and Mystic Lake Casino. West of the property is Southbridge 1" Addition (also known as East Dean Lake Planned Unit Development), and developed areas of the City of Shakopee. CSAH No. 18 and proposed County Road No. 21 bisect the property. A few existing homes and businesses are located between the property and Stagecoach Road. County: Scott City /I'wp.: City of Shakopee Maps: Copies of each of the following are attached as required: Figure 2: USGS 7.5 minute, 1:24:000 scale map indicating the project boundaries Figure 3: AUAR boundaries Figure 4, 5: Land use and zoning maps Figure 6: Cover types Additional maps are included throughout the document in order to display relevan information. 6. Description. For each major development scenario covered in the AUAR, a description should include at least the following: a. anticipated types and intensity (density) of residential and commercial/warehouse /light industrial development throughout the AUAR area; b. infrastructure planned to serve the development (roads, sewers, water, stormwater system, etc.). Roadways intended primarily to serve the adjoining land uses within an AUAR area are normally expected to be reviewed as part of an AUAR. More "arterial" type roadways that would cross an AUAR area are an optional inclusion in the AUAR analysis. If they are to be included, a more intensive level of review, generally including an analysis of alternative routes, is necessary; c. information about the anticipated staging of various developments, to the extent known, and of the infrastructure, and how the infrastructure staging will influence the development schedule. Note: The RGU must assure that the development described complies with the requirements of 4410.3610, subpart 3, and that it properly orders the AUAR and sets the description in that order as required by that section. a. Anticipated types and intensity of development The project proposer proposes the following types of development. Commercial The commercial land use category as proposed is divided into the following eight designations: Retail Retail Center Community Retail Service Retail Highway Commercial Commercial Services Neighborhood Commercial Hotel/Retail Theatre Home Improvement The Retail designation is reserved for parcels totaling 36.8 acres located primarily in the north central portion of the project along C.S.A.H. No. 18. The Retail Center designation is reserved for 25.8 acres in the northwest corner of the proposed project. The Community Retail designation is reserved for 12.9 acres on the north and south sides of Southbridge Parkway in the western half of the proposed project. The Service Retail designation is reserved for 7.0 acres at the intersection of Southbridge Parkway, C.S.A.H. No. 18, and future C.S.A.H. 21. The Highway Commercial designation is reserved for 24.6 acres on the eastern side of C.S.A.H. No. 18 in the center of the project. The Commercial Services designation is reserved for 17.1 acres on the east side of S.S.A.H. No. 19 in the eastern half of the project. The Neighborhood Retail designation is reserved for a 4.3 acre parcel located southwest of the intersection of Southbridge Parkway, S.S.A.H. No. 18, and future C.S.A.H. No. 21. The Hotel /Retail designation is reserved for 2.1 acres west of C.S.A.H. No. 18 in the northern portion of the project. The Theatre designation is reserved for 4.4 acres located in the center of the project, to the west of C.S.A.H. No. 18. The Home Improvement designation is reserved for 21.6 acres in the northeastern corner of the project. The residential land use category includes two designations: Single Family Residential and Multi Family Residential. Residential development is concentrated in the southern third of the project, south of the intersection of Southbridge Parkway, C.S.A.H. No. 18, and future C.S.A.H. No. 21, which is funded for the year 2004 in the County's current C IP. The Single Family Residential designation is reserved for 29.4 acres and the Multi - Family Residential designation is reserved for 27.6 acres. FOM The project proposer has identified two designations as falling in the public land use category; park and landfill. Four parcels totaling 22.5 acres, and generally located in southern half of the project are designated as Park. Additionally, 0.6 acres of land is designated as Landfill located outside Park areas. ll✓ The project includes two easement areas. A 4.7 acre Minnegasco easement runs parallel to and just south of the northern boundary of the project area. Northern States Power Company owns a 14.8 acre power line easement that runs through the northern third of the project from east to west. '= The proposed storm water ponding areas are shown on Figure 8. The total storm water ponding area is approximately 34.7 acres. Right -of -way for streets and roadways totals 23.9 acres. b. Infrastructure to serve the development Roadways, within anAUAR area, primarily intended to serve adjoining land uses are normally expected to be included in the AUAR; arterial roadways that cross the AUAR area are optional_ If they are to be included, a more intensive level of review including an analysis of alternative routes, is necessary. The proposed residential and commercial development would require the extension of existing sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer facilities. Construction of a lift station would be required to provide sanitary sewer service to the entire Shakopee Crossings project. Access to the site would be from existing C.S.A.H. No. 18 and Southbridge Parkway. Additional public streets will need to be constructed to provide access to the individual parcels. 5 C. Anticipated staging of various development and infrastructure Note: The RGU must assure that the development described herein complies with the requirements in 4410.3610, subpart 3. Development is expected to first occur west of C.S.A.H. No. 18 and north of Southbridge Parkway. Subsequent development may occur east and north of C.S.A.H. No. 18 or south of Southbridge parkway. The area south of C.S.A.H. No. 18 will be developed last. Utilities and streets would be extended as each area develops. Description of Project for EQB Monitor The Shakopee Crossings development proposal is for commercial and multi - family residential development on 315 acres of land that is currently zoned industrial in the City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota. The proposed development is located both east and west of the recently relocated C.S.A.H. 18, immediately south of S.T.H. 169 7. Project Magnitude Data The cumulative totals of the parameters called for should be given for each major development scenario. Number of Residential Units: Unattached: 62 -89 units Attached: 303 -308 units Commercial[Industrial/Institutional Building Area (gross floor space in total square feet): Indicate area of specific uses: Use Gross Floor Space Office: Manufacturing * ......................... 0 Retail: ............................................. 390,000 Other Industrial* .. ............................... 0 Warehouse......... ............................... 0 Institutional* ....... ............................... 0 Light Industrial .... ............................... 0 Agricultural ........ ............................... 0 Other Commercial (specify): .................. 980,000 Retail ....... ............................... 876,000 Commercial Retail ...................... 147,000 Home Improvement .................... 216,000 Highway Commercial .................. 148,000 Restaurant (2) ........................... 10,000 Building Height( s)* . .............................As governed by local ordinance *optional to include areas for these R A *optional to include areas for these 8. Permits and Approvals Required List all known local, state, and federal permits, approvals, and funding required A list of major approvals likely to be required by the anticipated types of development projects should be given. This list will help orient reviewers to the idea that the A UAR process is only one piece of the regulatory framework that will protect environmental resources. The list can also serve as a starting point for the development of the implementation aspects of the mitigation plan to be developed as part of the A UAR. • • 1 MNDNR MN Department of Health U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CA 1 1• Metropolitan Council City of Shakopee Ord • .. . 1. • . L . t . ,• Water Appropriation Permit Water Main Plan Review Clean Water Act Section 404 (Individual) Air Emission Facility Permits Indirect Source Permits (ISP) 401 Grading Permit Storm Sewer Permit Sanitary Sewer Permit Wastewater Permit NPDES Permit Drainage Permit Roadway Improvements (minor arterials) Roadway Access Permits Sanitary Sewer Connection Plan MUSA Expansion (approved) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezoning Preliminary and Final Plat Approval Conditional Use Permits (where required by City Code) Grading Permit Sewer Connection Permit Water Connection Permit Building Permits Wetland Alteration Permits Unless otherwise noted the status of the above permits is pending. " The Natural Heritage Database revealed 23 known element occurrences within several miles of the project area, but no element occurrences within the project boundaries. No species or communities were identified within the project area that would necessitate a takings permit from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 9. band Use (Item 9 is not needed for an A UAR, but can be covered by Items 20 and 28) Describe the current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands. Discuss the compatibility of the project with adjacent or nearby land uses; indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify any potential environmental hazard due to past land uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks. 10. Cover Types Cover Type Map depicting: ➢ Wetlands — identified by type (Circular 39) ➢ Watercourses — rivers, streams, creeks, ditches ➢ Lakes — identify protected water status and shoreland management classification ➢ Woodlands — identify native and old field ➢ Cropland ➢ Current development Overlay Map illustrating anticipated development in relation to the cover types. (This map should also depict any "protection areas ", existing or porposed, that will preserve sensitive cover types. Separate maps for each major development scenario should be generally be provided.) Figure 6 highlights a small portion of the site in the northwest quadrant that has been identified as a dry oak savannah dominated by white, bur, and red oaks with an assemblage of various prairie species in the herbaceous strata. Although this plant community could be considered significant in terms relative to the entire state, it has been too degraded by exotic species and disturbance to receive State protection as a significant natural community (i.e., it is not a pristine example of a dry oak savanna). The site has been extensively grazed throughout the recent past resulting in the loss of original dry prairie flora. Remaining herbaceous vegetation is an assemblage of dry prairie species; none of the observed species are rare or special concern species. Site inspections conducted by Svoboda Ecological Resources revealed substantial oak wilt in the area. Severe storms in 1998 toppled many trees, compounding damage to the site. Figure 6 also designates several areas as Low Grassland or Wet MMesic Forest, and these are low areas determined not to be wetland according to the 1997 TEP. Also, several areas are designated as Pond which were created in upland areas to regulate hydrology from on -site and off -site areas. Ponds will be incorporated into the final plat of the site. Pond areas may meet jurisdictional wetland criteria, however, these areas are exempt because they were created in upland areas for the purpose of containing and managing storm water runoff. 11. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources a. Describe fish and wildlife resources on or near the site and discuss how they would be affected by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. The description of wildlife and fish resources should be related to the habitat types depicted on the cover type maps (of item 10). Any differences in impacts between development scenarios should be highlighted in the discussion. The proposed project will impact wildlife in that it will alter existing habitat. It can be assumed that surrounding areas are already occupied by wildlife, and therefore, emigration to other habitats will not offset on -site losses. No plants or animals of special status are known to exist in the project area (see 1 Lb.). The applicant proposes commercial and residential development for approximately 93 percent of the project site, with 7 percent to be set aside as park land. Residential and commercial development favors wildlife that are habitat generalists, such as House Sparrows, American Robins, raccoons, and squirrels. Appended to this section are lists of herptiles, birds, and mammals that could occur throughout the seasons on or near the project area based upon literature. Birds. The project proposer conducted a census of breeding birds on June 2, June 16, and July 2, 1998 using a standardized behavior system recommended for North American birds (Laughlin et al. 1982). This is a conservative method to determine the breeding status of individual bird species; it is highly likely that all of these species are breeding, and this would have been corroborated with more intensive surveys. The subject property also provides stop -over habitat for migratory birds and wintering habitat to birds as well, but we did not conduct surveys during these time periods. The behavior code system utilized during the survey involved three hierarchical breeding categories: Possible, Probable, and Confirmed. Possible breeding included an observed male or female of a particular species in suitable nesting habitat or a singing male in suitable nesting habitat. Probable sightings included sever or more males in suitable habitat; pairs in suitable habitat; courtship, territoriality, or copulation; visiting a probable nesting site; or agitated behavior or anxiety calls from adults. Confirmed breeding included a nest with eggs; or, carrying fecal sac or food. Table 1 lists birds that might occur at the site based on breeding ranges as reported in the literature. Shokopee Crossings Draff AUAR April 1999 Table 1 Birds Observed Within the Shakopee Crossings Project Area Species Typical Habitat' Breeding House Wren woodland confirmed Chipping Sparrow open areas/woodland confirmed Field Sparrow shrubland confirmed Eastern Meadowlark grassland confirmed American Goldfinch shrubland confirmed Killdeer open areas/wetland probable Mourning Dove open areas/woodland probable Eastern Wood -pewee woodland probable Great Crested Flycatcher woodland probable Black - capped Chickadee open areas/woodland probable Sedge wren grassland probable American Robin open areas/woodland probable Brown Thrasher woodland probable Northern Cardinal open areas/woodland probable Clay- colored Sparrow shrubland probable Vesper Sparrow grassland probable Lark Sparrow grassland probable Grasshopper Sparrow grassland probable Song Sparrow shrubland probable Bobolink grassland probable Brown- headed Cowbird open areas /woodland probable Dickcissel grassland probable Ring- necked Pheasant grassland possible American Woodcock woodland/shrubland possible Yellow - billed Cuckoo woodland possible Eastern Phoebe woodland possible Eastern Kingbird grassland possible Barn Swallow open areas/residential possible Blue Jay open areas/woodland possible American Crow open areas/woodland possible White- breasted Nuthatch woodland possible Eastern Bluebird open areas/woodland possible Gray Catbird woodland possible Cedar Waxwing open areas/woodland possible Common Yellowthroat wetland possible 10 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 Indigo Bunting open areas /woodland Savannah Sparrow grassland possible possible a Open areas include residential areas, agricultural areas, and grassland with interspersed trees and shrubs; woodland includes young trees greater than nine feet in height; shrubland includes woody growth less than nine feet in height Reptiles and Amphibians. No reptiles were identified during our field visits. Appendix 2 lists herptile species that may occur at the site based on literature. Mammals. We only observed white - tailed deer, raccoon, and meadow voles during our field visits. Appendix 3 lists mammal species that might occur at the site based on literature. 11 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 Table 2 Plant Species Observed Within the Shakopee Crossings Project Area by Cover Type (Figure 6). Cover Types Scientific Name Common Name A B C D E F G H I J K L M Acer negundo box elder - - - - - - - - - X X - - Achillea millefolium yarrow - - X X - - - - - - - X - Agropyron repens quack grass - - - X X X - - - - - - - Ambrosia artemesiifolia little ragweed - X X X - - - - - - - X - Amorpha canescens leadplant - - - X X X - - - - - - - Arctium minus burdock - - X - X - X X - - - X X Arisaema triphyllum jack -in -the- pulpit - - - - - - - - - - X - - Artemesia ludoviciana sage - X - X X X - - - - - - - Asclepias incarnata swamp milkweed - - - - - - - X - - - - X Asclepias syriaca common milkweed - - - X X X - - X - - - - Bromus tectorum cheat grass - X X X X X - - - - X X - Bromus inermis smooth brome - X X X X X - - - - - X - Calamovilfa longifolia sand reed - X X X X X - - - - - - - Cannabis sativa marijuana - - - X X X - - X - - - - Capsella bursa pastoris shepherd's purse - X X X - - - - - - X X - Celtis occidentalis hackberry - - - - - - - - - X X - - Cenchrus longispinus sandbur - X - X - X - - - - - - - Commandra umbellate bastards toadflax - - - X X X - - - - - - - Cyperus schweinitzii Schweinitz' sedge - X - X X X - - - - - - - Dalea purpurea purple prairie clover - - - X X X - - - - - - - Dalea candidum white prairie clover - - - X X X - - - - - - - Dalea villosa villose prairie clover - - - X X X - - - - - - - Daturastramonium jimsonweed - - - X X X - - X - - - - 12 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 Scientific Name Common Name A B C D E F G H I J K L M Eleocharis erythropoda red- rooted spikerush X - - - - - - X - - - - X Euphorbia esula leafy spurge - X X X X X- - X- X X - Fragaria virginiana strawberry X- - X X X X X X X X X X Galium aparine common bedstraw - - - - - - - - X X X - - Geum triflorum prairie smoke - - - X X X - - - - - - - Iris versicolor iris - - - - - - - X - - - - - Koeleria cristata junegrass - X - X X X - - - - - - - Leonurus cardiaca motherwort - - - - X - - - - X X X - Lespedeza capitata round - headed bush clover - - - X X X - - - - - - - Lithospermum carolinense hoary puccoon - - - X X X - - - - - - - Lonicera tatarica tartarian honeysuckle - - - - - - X X X X X X - Lonicera morrowd Morrows' honeysuckle - - - - - - X X X - X X - Lychnis alba white campion - - - - - - - - X - X X - Maianthemum canadense Canada mayflower - - - - - - X - - - X - - Menispermum canadense moonseed - - - - -. - X - X - X - - Mimulus ringers monkey flower X - - - - - - X - X - - X Nepeta cataria catnip - - X - - - - - - - - X - Oenothera biennis evening primrose - X X X X X - - - - - - - Osmorhiza claytoni hairy sweet cicely - - - - X - X - - --x X X - Osmorhiza longistylis smooth sweet cicely - - - - X - X - - - X - - Oxalis dillennii sorrel - - - - X - X - - - X X - Panicum oligosanthes Scribner's panic grass - - - X X X - - - - - - - var. scribnerianum Parthenocissus Virginia creeper - - - - - - X - - - X X - quinquefolia Penstemon pallidus pale beardtongue - - - X X X - - - - - - - 13 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 Table 2. Continued. Cover Types Scientific Name Common Name A B C B E F G H I J K L M Phalaris arundinacea Plantago rugellii Poa compressa Poa pratensis Polygonum amphibium Polygonum pennsylvanicum Populus deltoides Prunus serotina Quercus macrocarpa Quercus rubra Quercus alba Rhamnus catharticus Rhus glabra Ribes cynosbati Rosa blanda Rubus allegheniensis Rumex acetosella Rumex crispus Salsola kali Sambucus canadensis Sanguinaria canadensis Silene antirhina Silphium integrifolium Smilacina racemosa reed canary grass X - - - - - - X - X - - X common plantain - - - - X - X - - X X X - Canada bluegrass - - X X - - - - - - - X - Kentucky bluegrass - - X X - - - - - - - X - water smartweed X - - - - - - X - - - - X Pennsylvania smartweed X - - - - - - X - X - - X eastern cottonwood wild black cherry bur oak red oak white oak buckthorn smooth sumac prickly wild gooseberry prairie rose red raspberry sour dock curly dock Russian thistle elderberry bloodroot sleepy catchfly rosinweed false Solomon's seal - - - - - - - - X X X - - - - - - - - X - - X X - - - - - - X - X - - - X X - - - - - X - X - - - X X - - - - - X - X - - - X X - - - - - X - X - X - X X - - - - X X-X - - X - - - - - - - - X - X - X - X X - - - - X X X - - - - - - - - - - - X - X - X - X - - X - - - - - - X - - - - X X - - - - - - X X X - - X - XX X X X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X X- - - - - - - - - - - - - X - - - - - - - - - - X - - - - - - - X X X - - - - - - - - - - - - - X - - -' X - - 14 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 Table 2. Continued. Cover Types Scientific Name Common Name A B C D E F G H I J K L M Smilax herbacea carrion flower - - - - - - X - - - X - - Solidago ulmifolia elm- leaved goldenrod - - - - - - X - - - x _ _ Taroxacum officinale common dandelion X- X X X X X- -- X X - Toxicodendron radicans poison ivy - - - - X - - - - - X - - Tradescantia ohiensis spiderwort - - - X X X - - - - - - - Ulmus americanus American elm - - - - - - - - - X X - - Urtica dioica stinging nettle - - - - - - - X - - - - X Verbascum thapsus mullein - X - X X X - - - - - X - Verbena stricta vervain - - - X X X - - - - - - - Verbena urticifolia white vervain - - - - - - - X - - - - X Vitis riparia riverbank grape - - - - - - - - - X X - - Xanthoxylem americanum prickly ash' - - - - - - - - X - X - - 15 1 Lb Are there any state - listed endangered, threatened, or special - concern species; rare plant communities; colonial waterbird nesting colonies; native prairie or other rare habitat; or other sensitive ecological resources on or near the site? If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the resources was conducted. Describe measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. For an A UAR, prior consultation with the DNR Natural Heritage program for information about reports of rare plant and animal species in the vicinity is required. Ifsuch consultation indicates the need, an on -site habitat survey for rare species in the appropriate portions of the AUAR is required. Areas of on -site surveys should be depicted on a map, as should any `protection zones" established as a result_ A Natural Heritage Database search revealed no element occurrences within the Shakopee Crossings project boundaries. However, within a radius of several miles, 23 known occurrences of 17 different "rare species or natural communities" (DNR letter dated 6/29/98) are documented in the database. Three element occurrences are possible for the site: gopher snake (Pituophis catenifer, special concern), plains pocket mouse (Perognathus flavescens, special concern), and rhombic - petaled evening primrose (Oenothera rhombipetala, special concern). Dry Oak Savanna and Dry Prairie occur on the subject property in a degraded condition that do not qualify for protection under State protocol. The site was extensively surveyed for rhombic - petaled evening primrose, which had been recorded for the section to the west of the project area, but no plants were observed. Natural Heritage staff also recorded plains pocket mouse and gopher snake for the section to the west. While the project area does provide suitable habitat for both species, but it appears unlikely that the project area would support viable populations of either animal. 'fable 3 Legend Describing Cover Types A Pond Shifting dunes (blowout) C Developed land (structures and earthmoving) D Non - native grassland/forbland E Degraded dry oak savannah F Dry sand prairie G Dry mesic forest H Low grassland (non - wetland according to a 1997 Technical Evaluation Panel review of subject property) I Shrubland J Wet Mesic Forest (non - wetland according to a 1997 Technical Evaluation Panel review of the subject property) K Mesic upland Forest L Heavily pastured dry oak forest M Type 2/3 wetland (Palustrine, persistent emergent, saturated or seasonally flooded) 10 Literature cited: Janssen, R. B. 1987. Birds in Minnesota: afield guide to the distribution of 400 species of birds in Minnesota. Univ. Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 352 pages. Oldfield, B. and Moriarty, J.J. 1994. Amphibians and reptiles native to Minnesota. Univ. Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 237 pages. Laughlin, S. B., D.P. Kibbe and P.F.J. Eagles. 1982. "Atlasing the distribution of breeding birds of North America." American Birds 36.6 -19. 17 12. Physical Impacts on Water Resources Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration (dredging, filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, diking, impoundment) of any surface water (lake, pond, wetland, stream, drainage ditch)? If yes, identify the water resource to be affected and describe: the alteration, including the construction process; volumes of dredged or fill material; area affected; length of stream diversion; water surface area affected; timing and extent of fluctuations in water surface elevations; spoils disposal sites; and proposed mitigation to minimiz impacts. The information required above should be supplied for any of the infrastructure associated with the AUAR development scenarios, and for any residential or commercial development expected to physically impact any water resources. Where it is uncertain water resources will be impacted depending on the exact design offuture developments, the AUAR should cover the possible impacts through a "worst case scenario " or else prevent impacts through the provision of the mitigation plan. No, the project will maintain natural drainage patterns and use existing drainage ditches in combination with proposed storm sewer and ponds to convey stormwater. All surface water runoff that is conveyed and collected will be treated utilizing NURP standards and discharges using rate control structures to ensure that proposed alterations do not impact surrounding water resources. The proposed plans will avoid impacts to wetlands in accordance with the Minnesota Wetland Conversation Act. At this time, no wetland impacts are planned. Any unavoidable impacts will be mitigated in accordance with all local, state, and federal laws. 13. Water Use a. Will the project involve the installation or abandonment or any wells? (For abandoned wells give the location and unique well number. For new wells, or other previously unpermitted wells, give the location and purpose of the well and the unique well number, if known) Yes, two wells were identified at a former farmstead south of the intersection of Southbridge Parkway and County Road 18. Neither unique well number is known. One well was used for farm operations and the other, and artesian well, provided water to the farmhouse. The wells will be capped in accordance with the provisions of the Minnesota Department of Health. With respect to b and c below, if the area requires new water supply wells, specific information about that appropriation and its potential impacts on groundwater levels should be given; if groundwater levels would be affected, any impacts resulting on other resources should be addressed. With respect to possible individual appropriations by future projects, a general assessment of the likely need for such should be included, and if there is potential for major appropriations or environmental issues resulting from individual appropriations, a more detailed assessment of those should be included along with a discussion of mitigation for potential problems. b. Will the project require an appropriation of ground or surface water (including dewatering)? If yes, indicate the source, quantity, duration, .purpose of the appropriation, and DNR water appropriation permit number of any existing appropriation. Discuss the impact of the appropriation on ground water levels. 18 Yes, dewatering will be required during some of the utility installation. This dewatering may result in the temporary lowering of the water table in adjacent wetlands. If the water table is lowered in these areas, the wetland vegetation may become dormant. It is assumed that the water table will return to normal when the dewatering is stopped and no permanent impact will be made on those wetlands. A DNR water appropriation permit will be acquired prior to the start of any dewatering. c. Will the project require connection to a public water supply? If yes, identigy the supply, the DNR water appropriation permit number of the supply, and the quantity to be used. Yes, extension of Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (SPUC) watermains from Southbridge First Addition through the project will be required, as well as completion of a matermain loop with the existing watermain on Stagecoach Road and T.H. 101 (See Figure 7). The project will use an estimated 340,430 GPD when fully developed. The City of Shakopee DNR water appropriation permit number is 80 -6205. The extension of MUSA to this area will necessitate the construction of an additional well and storage facility earlier than originally planned. 19 14. Water - related Land Use Management Districts Does any part of the project site involve a shoreland zoning district, a delineated 100 -year flood plain, or a state or federally designated wild and scenic river land use district? If yes, identify the district and discuss the compatibility of the project with the land use restrictions of the district. (Such districts should be delineated on appropriate maps and the land use restrictions applicable in those districts should be described. If any variances or deviations from these restrictions within the A UAR area are envisioned, this should be discussed.) No. 20 15. Water Surface Use Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body? If yes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts with other users or fish and wildlife resources. (This item need only be addressed if the AUAR would include or adjoin recreational water bodies) ION 21 16. Soils Approximate depth to: Ground water: minimum = 3.5 feet average = 9.5 feet Bedrock: minimum = 200 feet +/- average = 250 feet All groundwater data is for non - surface water areas and is based on boring logs. Bedrock information is based on the Metro Area Bedrock Topography Map (MGS). Describe the soils on the site, giving SCS classifications, if known. (SCS interpretations and soil boring logs need not be attached.) ZaB Zimmerman fine sand ZaC2 Zimmerman fine sand HdB Hubbard fine sand HdC Hubbard fine sand HdA Hubbard fine sand Ia Isanti fine sandy loam Ma Marsh PbA Peat PaA Peat and Muck 2 -6% slopes mod. Eroded 6 -12% slopes slight -mod. Erosion 2 -6% slopes 6 -12% slopes 0 -2% slopes 0 -2% slopes, deep 0 -2% slopes, shallow 22 17. Erosion and Sedimentation Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to be moved: (The number of acres to be graded and number of cubic yards of soil to be moved need not be given; instead, a general discussion of the likely earthmoving needs for development of the area should be given, with an emphasis on unusual or problem areas. In discussing mitigation measures, both the standard requirements of the local ordinances and any special measures that would be added for A UAR purposes should be included.) Acres = 283 Cubic Yards = unknown The existing site is generally level. The project proposer intends to mass grade nearly all the commercial and multi - family areas. The single family area would be graded as needed. The site is proposed to be developed in phases. When each phase is developed, grading, retention ponds, utility and street construction will be undertaken. Vegetation will be established immediately after grading by seeding, fertilizing, and mulching. Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map. There are no steep slopes on the site. There are slight to moderate erodible sands on the site. The sites where erodible sands are located will be watered during grading. Describe the erosion and sedimentation measures to be used during and after construction of the project. Silt fences, temporary siltation basins, and retention ponds will be installed during the initial phase of construction. After the grading has been completed, the site shall be seeded/fertilized and mulched. After vegetation has been established, the silt fences and temporary siltation basins shall be removed. Best Management Practices will be employed to reduce erosion and sedimentation until vegetation is established. 23 18. Water Quality — Surface Water Runoff For an AUAR the following additional guidance should be followed in addition to that in the "EAW guidelines ": ➢ It is expected that an AUAR will have a detailed analysis ofstormwater issues: ➢ A map of the proposed stormwater management system and of the water bodies that will receive stormwater should be provided: ➢ The description of the stormwater system should identigy on -site and "regional" detention ponding and also indicate whether the various ponds will be new water bodies or converted existing ponds or wetlands. Where on -site ponds will be used but have not yet been designed, the discussion should indicate the design standards that will be followed: ➢ If present in or adjoining the AUAR area, the following types of water bodies must be given special analyses: ➢ Lakes — within the Twin Cities metro area a nutrient budget analysis must be Prepared for any `priority lake" identified by the Metropolitan Council (See Appendix E of the "EA W Guidelines " (1990) or contact the Council staff. Outside of the Metro Area, lakes needing a nutrient budget analysis must be determined by consultation with the MPCA and DNR staffs: ➢ Trout streams f stormwater discharges will enter or affect a trout stream, an evaluation of the impacts on the chemical composition and temperature regime of the stream and the consequent impacts on the trout population (and other species of concern) must be included. a. Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project. Describe methods to be used to manage and/or treat runoff. The proposed commercial and residential development will increase the rate and volume of stormwater runoff from the site. In order to mitigate the impacts associated with this increase in runoff rates and volumes, storm water runoff will be directed into designated storm water retention ponds (See Figure 8). This runoff will then be released at a rate that is in full conformance with the City of Shakopee's Storm WaterManagement Plan. (See Appendix 5) Development will also result in slight degrading of the quality of storm water runoff. In order to mitigate the impacts of increased pollutant loading, storm water runoff will.be directed to treatment ponds that will be designed to meet Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) Standards. b. Identify the route(s) and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site. Estimate the impact of the runoff on the quality of the receiving waters. (If the runoff may affect a lake, consult "EAW Guidelines" about whether a nutrient budget analysis is needed.) Storm water will be conveyed through a system of storm sewer and retention ponds to their discharge points. Storm water on the west side of County Road No. 18 north of Southbridge Parkway will be conveyed north and discharge into existing storm water retention ponds constructed by the City of Shakopee and Minnesota Department of Transportation. 24 Storm water on the east and north side of County Road No. 18 will be conveyed to the north and east and discharge into a storm water retention pond built by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and into a drainage outlet built by the City of Shakopee on the east. Storm water on the south side of Southbridge Parkway north of future County Road No. 21 will then be conveyed to existing and proposed retention ponds to the west and then conveyed north across Southbridge Parkway then discharged into existing storm water retention ponds and outlets. Storm water from the area directly south of the intersection of County Road No. 18 and future County Road No. 18 and future County Road No. 21 will be conveyed to a retention pond along the south boundary of the site and discharged into a storm water retention pond built by Scott County. %I 19. Water Quality — Wastewater Observe the following points ofguidance in an AUAR: ➢ Only domestic wastewater would be coming from industrial uses that are excluded from review through an A UARprocess; ➢ Wastewater flows should be estimated by land use subareas of the AUAR area; the basis of flow estimates should be explained; ➢ The major sewer system features should be shown on a map and the expected flows should be Identified; ➢ If not explained under Item 6, the expected staging of the sewer system construction should be described; ➢ The relationship of the sewer system extension to the RGU's comprehensive sewer plan and (for metro area AUARs) to Metropolitan Council regional systems plans, including MUSA expansions, should be discussed. For non -Metro Area AUARs, the AUAR must discuss the capacity of the RGUs wastewater treatment system compared to the flows from the AUAR area; any necessary improvements should be described ➢ If on -site systems will serve part of the AUAR the gudidance in "EAW Guidelines" (pages 16 -17 should be followed. a. Describe sources, quantities, and composition (except for normal domestic sewage) of all sanitary and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. The completed project will generate an estimated 83,780 gpd of domestic wastewater from the residential development and an estimated 256,650 gpd of wastewater from the commercial development. The wastewater from the commercial development will consist of domestic wastewater and wastewater from restaurants, fast food businesses, service stations, car dealerships, and car washes. b. Describe any waste treatment methods to be used and give estimates of composition after treatment, or if the project involves on -site sewage systems, discuss the suitability of the site conditions for such systems. Identify receiving waters (including ground water) and estimate the impact of the discharge on the quality of the receiving waters. (If the discharge may affect a lake consult `EAW Guidelines" about whether a nutrient budget analysis is needed.) Wastewater from commercial activities will be pre - treated by the use of grease traps and/or sedimentation traps. Commercial activities may include, among others, restaurants, fast food businesses, service stations, car dealerships and car washes. Wastewater discharges will be required to meet city and MPCA requirements. C. If wastes will be discharged into a sewer system or pretreatment system, identify the system and discuss the ability of the system to accept the volume and composition of the wastes. Identify any improvements that will be necessary.. The wastewater flow from Shakopee Crossings is based on the following; Residential Area: Single Family 62U x 2.74 P/U x 100 GPD = 16,988 GPD Multi Family 27.6A x 11 U/A x 2.2 P/U x 100 GPD= 66,792 GPD 26 Commercial Area: Total Area 171.1A x 1,500 GPD /A = 256,650 GPD Total Wastewater Flow = 340,430 GPD The Shakopee Crossings project is entirely within the East Dean Lake trunk sanitary sewer service. The project will be served by the extension of sanitary sewer lines and the construction of a lift station (See Figure 9.) The wastewater will be conveyed by the existing East Dean Lake trunk sanitary sewer to the Prior Lake Interceptor and then treated by the Blue Lake Wastewater Treatment Plant. The East Dean lake Trunk Sanitary Sewer, Prior Lake Interceptor, and the Blue Lake Wastewater Treatment Plant have the capacity to provide service to this area. (See Appendix 6.) The proposed sanitary sewer extension to service the MUSA expansion area is in conformance with the City of Shakopee's Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan 27 20. Ground Water — Potential for Contamination a. Approximate depth to ground water: Minimum = 3.5 feet Average = 9.5 feet b. Describe any of the following hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site map; sinkholes; shallow limestone formations/karst conditions; soils with high infiltrations rates; abandoned or unused wells. Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards. There are no known hazards to groundwater or unusual soil or subgrade conditions. No soil on the site perolations rates that exceed six MPI. c. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present on the project site and identify measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating ground water. (A map should be included to show any groundwater hazards identified under "b ". Under "b" include any relevant information on soil contamination due to past land uses within the area, as mentioned under item 9.) All storm water detention ponds located adjacent to the former landfill sites will have one foot (1') clay liners installed. 28 21. Solid Wastes, Hazardous Wastes, Storage Tanks a. Describe the types, amounts, and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes to be generated, including animal manures, sludges and ashes.- Identify the method and location of disposal. For projects generating municipal solid waste indicate if there will be a source separation plan; list types(s) and how the project will be modified to allow recycling. (For "a ", generally only the estimated total quantity of municipal solid waste generated and information about any recycling or source separation programs of the RGU need be included.) This project will generate domestic solid waste and commercial solid waste. Commercial solid waste will be similar in type to domestic solid waste. The project proposer indicates that methods of recycling required under Shakopee City Code will be used. b. Indicate the number, location, size, and use of any above or below ground tanks to be used for Storage of petroleum products or other materials (except water). (For "b ", potential locations of storage tanks associated with commercial uses in the AUAR should be identified (e.g. gasoline tanks at service stations). The project proposer has no present plans to use either above- or below - ground tanks for the storage of petroleum products. If petroleum storage tanks are proposed to be used in the future, the number, type, size and location will be provided. All future petroleum storage tanks, and the installation thereof, they will meet the requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 29 Shokopee Crossings Draff AUAR April 1999 22. Traffic Parking spaces added = 10,434 Existing spaces (if project involves expansion) = 0 Estimated total Average Daily Traffic (ADT) generated Single Family Homes = 845 trips Multiple Unit Housing = 1,961 trips Park = 36 trips Retail/Specialty Retail = 63,232 trips TOTAL = 66,074 trips Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated (if known) and its timing: For each affected road indicate the ADT and the directional distribution of traffic with and without the project. Provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on the affected roads and describe any traffic improvements which will be necessary. For most AUAR reviews a relatively detailed traffic analysis will be needed especially if there is to be much commercial development in the AUAR area or if there are major congested roadways in the vicinity. The results of the traffic analysis must be used in the responses to item 23 and to the noise aspect of item 25. Instead of responding to the information called for in item 22, the following information should be provided• ➢ a description and map of the existing and proposed roadway system, including state, regional, and local roads to be affected include existing and proposed roadway capacities and existing and projected background (i.e., without the AUAR development) traffic volumes; ➢ trip generation data — trip generation rates and trip totals —for teach major development scenario broken down by land use zones and/or other relevant subdivisions of the area. The projected distributions onto the roadway system must be included,• ➢ analysis of impacts of the traffic generated by the AUAR area on the roadway system, including. comparison ofpeakperiodtotalflows to capacities and analysis of Levels of Service and delay times at criticalpoints (if any); ➢ a discussion of structural and non - structural improvements and traffic management measures that are proposed to, mitigate problems; Note. in the above analyses the geographical scope must extend outward as far as the traff `ic to be generated would have a significant effect on the roadway system and traffic measurements and projections should include peak days andpeak hours, or other appropriate measures related to identifying congestion problems, as well as ADTs. PM Peak Hour Weekday = 6,305 trips (3,096 Entering; 3,209 Exiting) (Year 2020) Significant roadway capacity has recently been added to the immediate area surrounding the development. TH 169 (Shakopee Bypass) and the associated We Shokopee Crossings Draff AUAR April 1999 Minnesota River Bridge crossing provides new and expanded access from the site to the north and west. In 1997 C.S.A.H. 18 was expanded to a four -lane cross section (with median) and grade - separated interchanges to State Highways 169 and 101. The primary access roadways serving the development are C.S.A.H. 18, TH 169, . and TH 101. Access from C.S.A.H 18 is proposed at two signalized intersections south of TH 169. The first is the existing "T" intersection of C.S.A.H 18 and Southbridge Parkway. The second is a new intersection approximately 1000' south of Southbridge which will connect site drive "C" and "D" to C.S.A.H_ 18. The intersection locations were determined as part of the negotiations involved with the C.S.A.H. 18 realignment through the property. Secondary access to the site will be will be via old CR 18 (Stagecoach Drive), which abuts the eastern boundary of the site. A site access point located across from 13' Avenue is planned to create a four - legged intersection. TH 169 (Shakopee Bypass) is a four -lane divided principal arterial with grade separated interchanges. No direct access from TH 169 is proposed. Table 4 Current and Proiected ADT (Weekday) Distribution T Location Year 2020. Year 2020 Year 2020 Projected ADT Site ADT Combined ADT C.S.A.H. 18 16,300 30,600 41,900 (North of Southbridge Parkway) C.R. 18 13,800 23,600 37,400 (South of Southbridge Parkway) 31 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 Note: ADT = Average Daily Traffic. ADT's developed under the assumption C.S.A.H. 21 i s not constructed by the year 2020. Figure 9 in the Traffic Analysis and Access Study for Indirect Source Permit, Summary Report (Appendix 9) presents the regional changes in ADT for the project. Mainline Capacity The capacity of C.S.A.H. 18 to accommodate the additional traffic was examined during the year 2006 PM weekday peak hour. Site related traffic is anticipated to add approximately 1,100 -1,300 vehicles per hour in the peak direction. With two lanes of traffic in each direction, and assuming CR 21 is not built, CR 18 is forecast to operate with a mainline capacity level of service B during the PM peak hour, indicating reasonably free flowing traffic outside the signalized intersections. Table 5 C.S.A.H. 18 Roadway Mainline Capacity (Peak Direction) Roadway Classification Year 2006 LOS Year 2006 LOS Southbound 'Southbound Peak )Flour Peak 11four Volume Volume With Without Project Project C.S.A.H. 18 Multi -Lane w/o 1,027 A 2,358 B (North of . Access Control Southbridge Parkway) C.S.A.H. 18 Multi -Lane w/o 807. -. A 1,920 B (South of Access Control Southbridge Parkway) Year 2006 without project includes East Dean's Lake residential development. Source: Mn/DOT Design Manual Table 2 -5.08A 32 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Seven signalized intersections are ultimately proposed as part of the AUAR development. Two signalized intersections are proposed to provide site access to C.S.A.H. 18. These are planned at Southbridge Parkway and Road "C "P'D ". Two signalized intersections are eventually proposed for Southbridge Parkway internal to the site (Road "A" and Road `B'). In addition, intersection delay would be monitored, with the recognition that background and site - generated traffic will eventually require signalization, at the following three intersections on C.S.A.H. 18 south of the site: Stagecoach Road/Preserve Trail; C.S.A.H. 16/20` Avenue; and C.S.A.H 16/34` Street). 33 5hokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 'Fable 6 Overall Signalized Intersection LOS Years 2003, 2006, 2020 Intersection Year 2003 Build Year 2006 Build Year 2020 Build MONKI Southbridge Parkway and Road " Southbridge B 0.59 Parkway and Road B 0.68 « C.S.A.H. 18 and B 0.77 Southbridge Parkway C.S.A.H. 18 and B 0.62 Road "C " / "D" C.S.A.H. 18 and B 0.51 Stagecoach Drive LOS V/C B 0.48 B 0.68 C 0.96 C 0.80 B 0.61 LOS V/C B 0.48 B 0.68 D 1.03 C 0.84 B 0.66 LOS = Level of Service, V/C = Volume to Capacity Ratio With the planned improvements, all intersections, except for the C.S.A.H. 18 at Southbridge Parkway, are anticipated to operate at LOS C or better in the year 2020. By the year 2020, background growth, combined with the- site generated traffic, will result in a LOS D at the C.S.A.H. 18 at Southbridge Parkway intersection, with the V/C ratio of 1.03 indicating the intersection is operating at capacity. The two C.S.A.H. 16 intersections proposed for signalization along C.S.A.H. 18 will continue to operate at an overall LOS B in the year 2020. Unsignalized Intersections The Road "C" at Stagecoach Drive intersection is a four -way intersection at 13' Avenue. The intersection is expected to operate at high levels of service (all movements above LOS C), with queue lengths averaging under two vehicles during the PM weekddy peak hour 34 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 under two -way stop control. With the recommended mitigation, each intersection located within or near the AUAR will operate at acceptable levels of service. Proposed Countv Road 21 When C.S.A.H. 21 is constructed, a new signal timing plan will be required for the C.S.A.H 18/21 four -way intersection that will be based on updated land use and traffic data. In addition to the reduction in storage capacity, C.S.A.H. 21 will significantly change the traffic volumes and patterns in the study area. With C.S.A.H. 21 unfunded, the assumption was made that it will not be open in the design year. Right -of -way around the C.S.A.H. 18 intersection has been set aside to accommodate an upgraded four - legged intersection. As part of the C.S.A.H. 21 environmental review, decisions on the roadway's final location, number of lanes, intersection design alternatives (at -grade or bridge), and phasing will be developed. Merging and Weaving Analysis The single TH 169 and TH 101 ramp lanes combine to form two southbound C.S.A.H.- 18 lanes. There is approximately 3,200 feet of distance between their connection, and the . . intersection with Southbridge Parkway. Within this distance, site. generated traffic will weave between the two lanes, depending on if they are destined for the east or west side of the development. In addition, traffic from the eastbound TH 169 ramp presently merges with C.S.A.H. 18. This analysis examines the year 2006 build scenario for roadway capacity. Approximately 655 eastbound TH 169 vehicles are predicted to merge with the 1,700 vehicles traveling southbound on the two lanes of C.S.A.H. 18 during the weekday PM peak hour. Using the present roadway design, the merge analysis shows C.S.A.H. 18 traffic would be s 35 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 slightly slowed (to 51 mph) as a result of the merging maneuver, and operate at an overall LOS C. This result indicates that sufficient capacity exists to accommodate the merging traffic without inducing delay. In addition, a weaving analysis was also performed on the segment of C.S.A.H. 18 between the TH 169 on -ramp, and the Southbridge Parkway deceleration lane. This analysis indicates a poor LOS (LOS E) for the southbound right travel lane as a result of through and right - turning traffic mixing in the same lane. This analysis assumes the worst -case scenario that traffic from westbound 101 and southbound TH 169 remains in their lane until they have passed the ramp from eastbound TH 169. However, there are approximately 1,000 feet of available weaving area prior to the eastbound TH 169 ramp that allows weaving to take place prior to the merge. This in turn would reduce the number of weaving conflicts downstream, and provide for a better lane balance and operation. Because parameters such as sight distance and driver familiarity play such an important role in merging and weaving analysis, no changes are recommended initially. However, if delays do occasionally develop, then consideration should be given to providing an auxiliary lane by restriping the southbound shoulder. For the year 2006 build analysis, providing an auxiliary lane between the eastbound TH 169 ramp and Southbridge Parkway results in a LOS B for non- weaving vehicles (54 mph speed), and LOS C for weaving vehicles (49 mph speed). 36 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 23. Vehicle - related air emissions Provide an estimate of the effect of the projects traffic generation on air quality, including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. (If the project involves 500 or more parking spaces, consult "EAW Guidelines" about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed.) The guidance provided in `EAW Guidelines" should also be followed for an AUAR Mitigation proposed to eliminate any potential problems maybe presented under item 22 and merely referenced here. The MPCA staff' should be consulted regarding possible ISP requirements for certain proposed developments, although the RGU may not want to assume responsibility for applying for an ISP for speck developments, it may be desirable to coordinate the A UAR and ISP analyses closely. With 10,434 parking spaces, Shakopee Crossings will require an Indirect Source Permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. An air quality analysis has been performed for critical intersections that carry access traffic to and from the project. Summary results of that analysis are presented here. A detailed discussion of methodology, assumptions, and results will be included in the Indirect Source Permit Application. Results of the air quality analysis for Carbon Monoxide (CO) are presented in Table 7 (1 -hour CO concentrations) and Table 8 (8 -hour CO concentrations). 37 Shokopee Crossings Draff AUAR April 1999 Fable 7 Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (1 -hour) at Critical Intersections Serving Shakopee Crossings (Maximum Concentrations by Intersection at Receptor Sites 100 Feet from Intersection) All Concentrations in Parts per Million (ppm) (zwi 1 -hour CO Concentrations (Including Background) 2003 2006 No Build Build Increase No Build Build Increase CSAH 18 /Southbridge 2.7 4.87 2.1 3.8 5.9 2.1 NW Site Dr B /Southbridge 2.3 3.1 0.8 2.9 3.1 0.2 NE /South Site Dr /Southbridge 2.5 3.2 0.7 4.9 3.8 -1.1 CSAH 18 /CSAH 89 2.5 2.8 0.3 2.9 2.9 0.0 CSAH 18 /CSAH 16 (N) 2.5 2.8 0.4 3.I 3.2 0.1 CSAJ 18 /CSAH 16 (S) 2.4 2.8 0.4 2.9 2.9 0.0 MPCA Standard 9.0 9.0 (zwi Shokopee Crossings Draft ALTAR April 1999 Table 8 Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (8 -hour) at Critical Intersections serving Shakopee Crossings (maximum concentrations by intersection at receptor sites 100 feet from intersection) All Concentrations in parts per million (ppm) The intersection of Southridge Parkway and CSAH 18 is expected to experience the highest 1 -hour and 8 -hour CO concentrations as well as the highest increase in CO concentrations from the No -Build to Build condition in both 2003 (Stage 1) and 2006 (Stage 2). Increases in CO concentrations are expected to be greatest when Stage 1 is completed and operational in the year 2003 and somewhat lower when Stage 2 is completed and operational in the year 2006. The reduction in CO concentration at the NE /South Site Drive at Southbridge Parkway intersection is due to significant improvements in intersection geometry for Stage 2 in 2006, including additional through and turning lanes. Relatively low concentrations and increases in concentrations are expected at intersections along CSAH 18 that do not carry as much site - related traffic. The highest predicted 1 -hour concentration (8.7 ppm) is expected to occur in the year 2006 39 8 -hour CO Concentrations (including background) 2003 2006 No Build Build Increase No Build Build Increase CSAH 18 /Southbridge 2.7 4.8 2.1 3.8 5.9 2.1 NW Site Dr B /Southbridge 2.3 3.1 0.8 2.9 3.1 0.2 NE /South Site Dr /Southbridge 2.5 3.2 0.7 4.9 3.8 -1.1 CSAH 18 /CSAH 89 2.5 2.8 0.3 2.9 2.9 0.0 CSAH 18 /SCSAH 16 (1) 2.5 2.8 0.4 3.1 3.2 0.1 CSAH 18 /CSAH 16 (S) 2.4 2.8 0.4 2.9 2.9 0.0 MICA STANDARD 9.0 9.0 The intersection of Southridge Parkway and CSAH 18 is expected to experience the highest 1 -hour and 8 -hour CO concentrations as well as the highest increase in CO concentrations from the No -Build to Build condition in both 2003 (Stage 1) and 2006 (Stage 2). Increases in CO concentrations are expected to be greatest when Stage 1 is completed and operational in the year 2003 and somewhat lower when Stage 2 is completed and operational in the year 2006. The reduction in CO concentration at the NE /South Site Drive at Southbridge Parkway intersection is due to significant improvements in intersection geometry for Stage 2 in 2006, including additional through and turning lanes. Relatively low concentrations and increases in concentrations are expected at intersections along CSAH 18 that do not carry as much site - related traffic. The highest predicted 1 -hour concentration (8.7 ppm) is expected to occur in the year 2006 39 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 and is well below the 30 ppm 1 -hour ambient air quality standard for Carbon Monoxide. The highest predicted 8 -hour concentration (5.9 ppm) is below the 9 ppm 8 -hour ambient air quality standard. Therefore, no adverse impacts on air quality are anticipated due to the proj ect. 40 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 25. Dust, odors, or noise Will the project generate dust, odors, or noise during construction and/or operation? If yes, describe the sources, characteristics, duration, and quantities or intensity, and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Also identify the locations of sensitive receptors in the vicinity and estimate the impacts on these receptors. Dust, odors, and construction noise need not be addressed in an AUAR, unless there is some unusual reason to do so. The RGU might want to discuss as part ofthe mitigation plan however, any dust control or construction noise ordinances in effect. If the area will include or adjoin major noise sources a noise analysis is needed to determine if any noise levels in excess ofstandards would occur, and if so, to identify appropriate mitigation measures. With respect to traffic generated noise, the noise analysis should be based on the traffic analysis of item 22. Yes, the dust, noise and odors generated by this project will be normal for development activities. Dust and noise will be generated by heavy equipment during the construction phase. The project site will be watered during construction to control dust. All dust and noise will be monitored by the City, and the contractors will be required to comply with all applicable City ordinances. The noise and dust disturbances will end upon completion of the project. There are no sensitive receptors on or near the project site. Based upon Minn. Stat. par. 116.07, subd.2a, Minnesota noise standards apply only to roadways within the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul. However, for compatibility planning and noise impact analysis, estimates of traffic noise levels along access roadways have been made.. Traffic noise levels have been estimated for the Build 2006 scenario which represents the worst case expected noise levels expected within one year after project completion. A noise analysis has been performed for roadways that will carry access traffic to and from the project. Summary results of the noise analysis are presented here. A detailed discussion of methodology, assumptions, and results will be included in the Indirect Source Permit Application. 41 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 Results of the noise analysis are in terms of distance of the L10 65 (daytime noise standard) and L 10 55 (nighttime noise standard) contours. PM Peak Hour traffic volumes have been used to estimate the daytime L10 levels and L10 65 contour distance. Based upon data from TH 101 and TH 169 as well as typical behavior along major arterials and collectors, the critical "nighttime" hour (6 -7 am) is assumed to be 60 percent of the PM Peak Hour traffic. Location of these contours from the roadway centerline along major roadway segments is shown in Table 9. Table 9 Traffic Noise L10 Contour Distances (in feet) from Major Roadway Segments Serving Shakopee Crossings Notes: (1) Along those segments with primarily commercial land use, the commercial noise standards will apply and no incompatibility because of noise level is anticipated. For segments with a large estimated L10 55 contour distance, no intervening shielding from terrain or other structures has been assumed. No exceedance of daytime L10 65 levels are expected at residential land uses along these routes. Where residential land uses are exposed to noise levels over the nighttime standards, appropriate construction can be used to comply with 42 Daytime L10 65 Nighttime Z10 55 Notes Roadway Segment Land Uses Southbridge - West of NW Site Dr Commercial/Residential 80 180 (1) Southbridge - CSAH 18 to NW Site Dr Commercial 135 365 (2) CSAH 18 - Southbridge to NW Site Dr Commercial 200 540 (2) CSAH 18 - Southbridge to NE Site Dr . Commerical/Residential 200 540 (1) CSAH 18 - South of CSAH 16 (S) Commercial/Residential 190 513 (1) CSAH 16 (1) - West of CSAH 18 Commercial/Residential 25 81 (3) CSAH 16 (S) - East of CSAH 18 Residential 501- _ - 126 (3) CSAH 89 - East of CSAH 18 Residential _ 40 108 (3) Notes: (1) Along those segments with primarily commercial land use, the commercial noise standards will apply and no incompatibility because of noise level is anticipated. For segments with a large estimated L10 55 contour distance, no intervening shielding from terrain or other structures has been assumed. No exceedance of daytime L10 65 levels are expected at residential land uses along these routes. Where residential land uses are exposed to noise levels over the nighttime standards, appropriate construction can be used to comply with 42 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR A 1999 exemptions to the rules that permit applicability of commercial land use standards. Unless residential density is greater than 10 per one -half mile and other reasonableness conditions are met, construction of highway sound barriers is not likely to be cost - effective. (2) Along these segments with commercial land use, the commercial noise standards will apply and no incompatibility because of noise level is anticipated. (3) Limited impact from the project is expected along these segments. Based upon the analysis of noise assoicated with traffic on roadways accessing the project, no significant adverse impacts are anticipated. 43 23. Vehicle - related Air Emissions 45 24. Stationary Source Air Emissions Will the project involve any stationary sources of air emissions (such as boilers or exhaust stacks)? If yes, describe the sources, quantities, and composition of the emissions; the proposed air pollution control devices; the quantities and composition of the emissions after treatment; and the effects on air quality. This item is not applicable to an AUAR. Any stationary air emission source large enough to merit environmental review requires individual review. No. 46 25. Dust, Odors, or Noise 47 26. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site? d. archeological, historical, or architectural resources? No. e. prime or unique farmlands? No. f. designated parks, recreation areas, or trails? Yes, a portion of the project area is within a neighborhood park service area identified in the City of Shakopee's draft Comprehensive Park and Trail Plan. It is expected there will be sidewalks and trails throughout the project area. g. scenic views and vistas? No. h. other unique resources? No. If any items are answered Yes, describe the resource and identify any impacts on the resource due to the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimiz or avoid adverse impacts. Archeological, historic, and architectural resources. For an A UAR, contact with the State Historic Preservation Office is required to determine whether there are areas of potential impacts to these resources. If any exist, an appropriate site survey of high probability areas is needed to address the issue in more detail. The mitigation plan must include mitigation for any impacts identified. During May of 1998, the 106 Group, Ltd. conducted an additional Phase I archeological reconnaissance survey of the Shakopee Crossings project area. A Phase I archeological survey of the originally proposed 550 -acre site was completed by the 106 Group, Ltd. during November 1997. This survey identified no sites within the project areas of potential effect. Since the 1997 survey was completed, an additional parcel has been incorporated into the development. The area of potential effect for the new parcel is conterminous with the limits of the present survey area. The survey area includes approximately 315 acres bordering the eastern limits of the originally proposed development, and encompasses a section of CSAH No. 18. This area is located in the E %2 - SE 1 /4 of Section 11, the W %2 - SW 1 /4 of Section 12, the NW — NW 1 /a of Section 13, and the NE — NE 1 /4 of Section 14. 50 The 1997 investigation was carried out for a consortium of property owners, including: Valley Green Business Park Limited Partnership, Shakopee Crossings LP, and the Minneapolis Foundation. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was prepared for the original 550 acres of development (i.e. East Dean Lake PUD /Southbridge), and was reviewed by the relevant regulatory agencies. The 1998 investigation was undertaken in connection with the preparation of this AUAR for the additional 315 acres of proposed development. The additional investigation consisted of a Phase 1 survey for the identification of archeological sites. Due to the proximity of the previously surveyed project area, no additional background research was undertaken, except for a review of 7.5 minute topographic coverage of the present survey area (USGS 1980). The archeological field survey included a visual reconnaissance of the project area. None of the survey area was assessed as having a high probability of containng previously unidentified archeological sites. The 106 Group Ltd. recommended that no further archeological investigation is warranted within the proposed project area. Prime or unique farmlands The extent of conversion of existing farmlands anticipated in the AUAR should be described_ If any farmland will be preserved by special protection programs, this should be discusser. Designated parks, recreation areas, or trails If the development of the AUAR will interfere or change the use of any existing such resource, this should be described in the AUAR. The RGU may also want to discuss under this item any proposed parks, recreation areas, or trails to be developed in conjunction with development of the A UAR area_ Scenic views and vistas 27. Any impacts on such resources present in the AUAR should be addressed. This would include both directphysical impacts and impacts on visual quality or integrity. `EAW Guidelines" contains a list ofpossible scenic resources (p. 20). 51 27. Will the Project Create Adverse Visual Impacts? (Examples include: glare from intense lights; lights visible in wilderness areas; and large visible plumes from cooling towers or exhaust stacks.) If any non - routine visual impacts would occur from the anticipated development covered by the MUSA review, this should be discussed here along with appropriate mitigation. 28. It is expected that the proposed commercial development will include substantial site lighting. The Shakopee City Code includes provisions that regulate light levels from such lighting at or past the project area boundaries. All site lighting will have to conform to these requirements. 52 28. Compatibility with Plans Is the project subject to an adopted local comprehensive land use plan or any other applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of a local, regional, state, or federal agency? Yes. If yes, identify the applicable plan(s), discuss the compatibility of the project with the provisions of the plan(s) and explain how any conflicts between the project and the plan(s) will be resolved. If no, explain. The AUAR must include a statement of certification from the RGU that its comprehensive plan complies with the requirements set out at 4410.610 subpart 1 The A UAR document should discuss the proposed A UAR area development in the context of the comprehensive plan. If this has not been done as part of the responses to items 6, 9, 19, 22, and others, it must be addressed here; a brief synopsis should be presented here if the material has been presented in detail under other items. Necessary amendments to comprehensive plan elements to allow for any of the development scenarios should be noted. If there are any management plans of any other local, state, or federal agencies applicable to the A UAR area, the document must discuss the compatibility of the plan with the various development scenarios studied, with emphasis on any incompatible elements. The proposed project is subject to the City of Shakopee's 1995 Comprehensive Plan, as that plan was amended in 1999 to extend Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) to about 222 acres of the project area. The project appears to be in general conformance with the current land use section, which states at page 36 that "anticipated growth in Shakopee and the surrounding suburban areas will necessitate the creation of a regional commercial area at the intersection of C.S.A.H. 18 and the Shakopee Bypass due to this area's unique locational attributes in this section of the Metropolitan Area." The City of Shakopee has submitted a revised comprehensive plan for the Metropolitan Council's consideration. The proposed project will require additional amendment(s) for the extension of MUSA to the other areas that make. up the proposed project. This amendment will also require the approval of the Metropolitan Council. The following proposed land uses will require rezoning: The commercial development east of C.S.A.H. 18; currently designated Medium Density Residential and Open Space; Multi- family housing shown south of the intersection of C.S.A.H.'s 18 and future 21; currently designated Single Family; ➢ Single Family housing west of C.S.A.H.'s 18 and future 21; currently designated Medium Density Residential; ➢ Neighborhood Commercial north of future C.S.A.H. 21; currently designated open space; and Community Retail and Service Retail; currently designated Medium Density Residential. 53 29. Impact on Infrastructure and Public Services 54 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 29. Impact on Infrastructure and Public Services Will new or expanded utilities, roads, other infrastructure, or public services be required to serve the project? If yes, describe the new or additional infrastructure /services needed. (Any infrastructure that is a "connected action" with respect to the project must be assessed in this EAW,• see "EAW Guidelines "for details.) This item should first of all summarize information on physical infrastructure presented under other items (such as 6, 18, 19, and 22). Other major infrastructure or public services not covered under other items should be discussed as well — this includes major social services such as schools, police, fire, etc. As noted above and in the "EAW Guidelines, " the RGU must be careful to include project- associated infrastructure as an explicit part of the AUAR review if it is to be exempt from project - speck review in the future_ Infrastructure The project will be developed in a phased approach over a six -year period, beginning in the year 2000 and ending in the year 2005. For the purpose of the Indirect Source Permit (ISP), the project is separated into two stages. Stage 1 encompasses the first three years of anticipated development between the years 2000 and 2002, and Stage 2 encompasses the last three years of development between the years 2003 to 2005. A summary of the assumed year of full occupancy for each ISP Stage is shown below. ISP Stage 1: Summer of year 2002 (ISPAnalysis year 2003) 700,000 sq. ft. of Retail 216,000 sq. ft. of Home Improvement Retail 147,000 sq. ft. of Commercial Retail 108,000 sq. ft. of Highway Retail 10,000 sq. ft. Restaurant (2) ISP Stage 2: Summer of the year 2005 (ISPAnalysis year 2006) 176,000 sq. ft. of Retail 40,000 sq. ft. of Highway Retail 55 Shokopee Crossings Draff AUAR April 1999 303 Multi - Family residential 89 Single - Family residential Ultimate Development (ISP Stage 1 and 2 — Year 2006) 876,000 sq. ft. of Retail 216,000 sq. ft. of Home Improvement Retail 147,000 sq. ft. of Commercial Retail 148,000 sq. ft. of Highway Retail 10,000 sq. ft. Restaurant (2) 303 Multi- Family residential 89 Single - Family residential The addition of ISP Phase 1 development traffic to year 2003 background traffic will require a combination of improvement encompassing intersection signalization, additional intersection turn -lanes, and the creation of a new support roadway network to service the planned development. The specific improvements recommended follow_ ISP Phase 1— Assumed Improvements (Fear 2003) New Roadways Construction of a new 1,100' internal access roadway (Road "A') through the northwestern quadrant connecting with Southbridge Parkway. ® Construction of a new 1,600' internal access roadway (Road `B'� through the northwestern quadrant connecting with Southbridge Parkway. ® Construction of a new 800' internal access roadway (Road `B ") through the southwestern quadrant connecting Southbridge Parkway with East Dean's Lake residential development- 0 Construction of a new 4,700' internal access roadway (Road " C'D through 091 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 the northeastern quadrant connecting C.S.A.H 18 and Stagecoach Drive at 13 Avenue. New or Upgraded Intersections • Reconstruction of the Southbridge Parkway and Road `B" intersection to provide two westbound left -turn lanes, a westbound right -tum lane, and one eastbound left -turn lane. • Reconstruction of the Southbridge Parkway and C.S.A.H 18 intersection to provide for two eastbound left -turn lanes, two northbound left -turn lanes, and an exclusive southbound right -turn lane. • The addition of a western leg to the 13` Avenue and Stagecoach Drive intersection from Road "C" containing one left, one through, and one right -turn lane. • Construction of a new intersection on C.S.A.H. 18 at Road "C" providing two southbound left-turn lanes and a single northbound right -turn lane on C.S.A.H. 18; and two westbound left -turn lanes and a single right -turn lane from Road "C ". Signalized Intersections • A new traffic signal at the intersection of Road `B" and Southbridge Parkway. • A new traffic signal at the intersection of C.S.A.H 18 and Southbridge Parkway. • A new traffic signal at the intersection of C.S.A.H 18 and Road "C ". • Monitoring the delay, with the recognition that background and site - generated traffic will eventually require signalization, at the following intersections: 1. C.S.A.H 18 and Preserve Trail 57 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR - April 1999 2. C.S.A.H 18 and C.S.A.H. 16 (Eagle Creek Boulevard/20' Avenue South) 3. C.S_A.H 18 and C.S.A.H. 16 (24" Avenue South) The addition of ISP Phase 2 traffic to year 2006 background and ISP Phase 1 traffic will require signal retiming and the creation of a new support roadway network to service the additional planned development. The anticipated improvements required follow. ISP Phase 2 — Assumed Improvements (Year 2006) New Roadways ® Construction of a new 3,000' internal access roadway (Road "D ") through the south quadrant connecting with C.S.A.H. 18 across from internal access Road "C ". ® Construction of a 1,300' extension to the internal access roadway (Road "A ") through the northwestern quadrant. New or Upgraded Intersections ® Reconstruction of the C.S.A.H 18 and internal access drive Road "C" intersection to provide for an eastbound approach (one eastbound left -tum lane, one through lane, and one right -turn lane); a single northbound left- turn lane; and an exclusive southbound right -turn lane. Signalized Intersections ® A new actuated traffic signal at the intersection of Road "A" and Southbridge Parkway. ® Monitoring the delay, with the recognition that signalization will likely be eventually required, based on background and site - generated traffic, at the s 58 Shokopee Crossings Draft AUAR April 1999 following intersections: 1. C.S.A.H 18 and Preserve Trail 2. C.S.A.H 18 and C.S.A.H. 16 (Eagle Creek Boulevard/20' Avenue South) 3. C.S.A.H 18 and C.S.A.H. 16 (24` Avenue South). 59 30. Related Developments; Cumulative Impacts This item does not require a response for an AUAR since the entire AUAR process deals with cumulative impacts from related developments within the AUAR area. .1 31. Other Potential Environmental Impacts If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts that were not addressed by items 1 to 28, identify them here, along with any proposed mitigation. Closed Landfill Sites: Because of the potential for the development and migration of harmful or bothersome quantities of landfill gas, the developer proposes a minimum setback of fifty feet from the capped landfill sites to all buildings in order to prevent any public nuisances and /or hazards. The proposed setback is similar to setbacks proposed for the adjacent East Dean Lake PUD (Southbridge) and required by the MPCA for the Highway 96 landfill site in White Bear Lake Township. The developer will continue to monitor the area, and if observations indicate evidence of decomposition of organic matter, such as stressed vegetation, odors, or settlement of the ground, then appropriate remedial action will be taken, including the installation of monitoring wells if needed to determine the extent of any problem with the capped dump site. A related issue is the compatibility of this landfill with a proposed park. This issue needs further; thorough examination. 61 32. Summary of Issues List any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is commenced. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts or issues, including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. The RGU may answer this question as asked by the form, or instead may choose to provide an Executive Summary to the document that basically covers the same information. Either way, the major emphasis should be on: potentially significant impacts, the differences in impacts between major development scenarios, and the proposed mitigation. Issues related to the safety of using a closed landfill as proposed park should be thoroughly examined. Mitigation Plan. The final A UAR document must include an explicit mitigation plan. At the RGU's option, a draft plan may be included in the draft AUAR document; of course, whether or not there is a separate item for a draft mitigation plan, the proposed mitigation must be addressed through the document. It must be understood that the mitigation plan in the final document takes on the nature of a commitment by the RGU to prevent potentially significant impacts from occurring from specific projects. It is more than just a list of ways to reduce impacts —it must include information about how the mitigation will be applied and assurance that it will. Otherwise, the AUAR may not be adequate and/or specific projects may lose their exemption from individual review. The RGU's final action on the AUAR must specifically adopt the mitigation plan; therefore, the plan has a `political" as well as a technical dimension. Response to comments on the draft A UAR document. The final AUAR document must include a section specifically responding to each timely and substantive comment on the draft that indicates the way in which the comment has been addressed. Similar comments may be combined for purposes of responding. In an AUAR document, no certifications as listed at the end of the EAW form are necessary. (The RGU is legally responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the document and for properly distributing it nonetheless.) M 41 2�� io N o 0 c CIO c . IT, r z Vi q A t L__ �' u I ��•�� z- " Hsu ' :� - x �� ,�F'. O ' � ,�� - Url ` S , � ��.'�-1•, `.n ..�� �fr�: tj ` � n "'� Z ro � � � _ . I . t�- �' �- -i' I ; J ' �---•� ) I j ' '.. _ ..rt #Z AN Ei o to �� <. �'I �- •: 7� f - �,11yI � l • ,!' t�. !t �1aL r, •.i A ' � �' I �� - �, 11 � -f'11 ��: .� !7! - -- -..,, - — .�I `; , � .` � V � `•.:\ _r. i . ��r� , r ��! � .. _ ' L t - y J— �. - .- � i � %�� I ., I � I -`� l.' h+ l !• � _ I � �i.' j .1 � I � � r I I,� 2 ___ 5 +..- .+ r - -_ .or • r ,���� _ _ ------ . - -. —;— - _tr... .— . - -�I/ / n.u.r. �a .t � _... - .� � :,II I I ~ "� � -� _ 'Ili .' I '. C — == {{ - =L` - -- � �_1� `{Id1 _- ^ I '� n -".�._ -_ J] ,..- . ` , __ ! _,. ( 7 {: `• ( 'Ir T ; t I- t �t:'LI1 - _ 07 J. ""3} - tl _1J- � f: I' 'r F �y •�; � � '•) ��. � � 'IL 11 }',I' ` '� - -- ` ` i,' I I t I ' , i t �_ (. ED - - ILA - ; �` J J . 4 1 11 l r �'� �� \•�� # � � it r '1 I'� — � , ' � � Cn ti IFO d en t ` t o r?-- -4L- v U1 I V J Il• 760 on-= 8 0 IT a,- 41 u 600' 1200' 1800 1 inch = 1,200 feet I SMGRE ID Lo, 0 . ............ NORTH NORTH Z12 - 0 100 200 400 FEET DAHLGREN, SHARDLOW, AND UBAN, INC. APRIL 26,1999 • M a l • Figure 5 EXISTING ZONING 0 NORTH U 0 100200 400 FEET DAHLGREN, SHARDLOW, AND UBAN, INC. APRIL 21, 1999 FUTURE DEVELOP 9 C •- N� 69 N � 0 BYP P.SS S KAKOPEE FROM YIEST B 001 0 IE 5 1. = Iumu PARF. PARK 't P 2.42 acres T P D -29 9 RETAIL acrea 2 RETAIL 2.1 3 1 5 area RETAIL IIOIEI'RETAIL 2.6 acrea 213 acrea 0.67 acrea RE F'11 ' � 5.19 acrea P 1.21 acre �'. • - _ PET =11 \ 3.7 ocroa - � 11^p Cr'D 410 • RETAII TI 8 - a �� :• \�` P 1.16 ucr. 0 0)) 10 \ �� - 1j le { Z \ MAIL 7.15 acre: I- �, \�•;. P 035 ocroa .Jill " :[AlEllltllT! r.Era1L < \ / III OU I/ S ip ' %�! 'A acrea - %J/ T� =oc j / -_- i I 13 1.IULIn E FAMILY 7.2 ocroa / 1 p,PF 3C) IIE1 IRON V-4) IIMf I r� 1 clue ?r: r 1.18 acrea F+ARp. _ 31 \ \' 11111 RPIE FAMILY PARK 6.8 acres t 7.15 vu -� OIfiE Al.IL'f 10 9. ecr 9 J2 3 II 1 � 11 I � 12 6 4 i � 5 13 i 1 -. 33 PARK 4.2 n•:r:a - 11IGIE 4 MLY 71 / 15 P19.9 1 ea 6 _ to . I ® 9 \ 1G 2 � ?.11 n � I S 1/'24 123 122 21 20 119 16 17\ to 14 /13 1 12 JAI11)"i - t, Ie1`.)9 LEGEND - - EXISTING 12" WATER A IP'I I, I"1;)( )Po' 16" TRUNK VJA TF RMAIN ° e I EXITING CAPPED LANDFILLS C WILLIAM R. ENGELHA.RDT ASSOCIATES, INC. l CONSULTING ENGINEERS r CHASKA, MINNFSO I A. 55318 C 0 J f...1 N0. 13 -_ - STATE -w AVENUE P 2.99 noes Panel 13Tt±_. 19 HIGIIY/AY COMMERC1A1 i18 nrrea P 102 acre: MAIAERCIAL SERVICES 8.87 acrea P 1.71 acres / r 24 : -, COMMERCIAL SEWN l 9.11 acre J `` P O 11 ewe 2'_l 1 �'nfJMfRl1A1 SERN! ES `)0 i ?R art •� HI ^ n7lAy r unENt l�l E rt ei l an.a P 1.04 -26 \ _� - � rrri111V KrlAl 9tPttr t C -' 1 ?7 r. -• Pun ., \\ IllI lIWA1 1't •r I1.IFRCIM 51tt 1 "• ?7 PARK / 8.2 acrea fiET \� 2.13 �' ' >> , 1 2 36 / 5 LIULIIPLE FAAIIL "f 18 `` �`�� / \ 13 4 6 .57 ma ca ti: �. \ \\ Ti 11301-1111, WRINGS L A14E /�J ----I RET� 4 61 acres - � /• --� 15 f I ' 22 RETAIL 1 --� I --I HOME 1.4 acres P 0.50 acrea' - � I--- -I 1-- -11- -I IMPROWNEEIT 22.0 acrea , I 16 -� F -i RETAIL 1.67 acre* P 0.53 ocroa ® � � A l -'I 17 RE TA4 2.69 acre: ' ®UtlOt 1' 0.71 nrr.- 12.88 acra a H117HY/A'i COMMERCIAL. 12.78 acre- P 1.12 acrea 1 19 HIGIIY/AY COMMERC1A1 i18 nrrea P 102 acre: MAIAERCIAL SERVICES 8.87 acrea P 1.71 acres / r 24 : -, COMMERCIAL SEWN l 9.11 acre J `` P O 11 ewe 2'_l 1 �'nfJMfRl1A1 SERN! ES `)0 i ?R art •� HI ^ n7lAy r unENt l�l E rt ei l an.a P 1.04 -26 \ _� - � rrri111V KrlAl 9tPttr t C -' 1 ?7 r. -• Pun ., \\ IllI lIWA1 1't •r I1.IFRCIM 51tt 1 "• ?7 PARK / 8.2 acrea fiET \� 2.13 �' ' >> , 1 2 36 / 5 LIULIIPLE FAAIIL "f 18 `` �`�� / \ 13 4 6 .57 ma ca ti: �. \ \\ Ti 11301-1111, WRINGS L A14E N• ���• b BYPASS SHAKOPEE FROM WEST BOUI'1D_ L1�NES PARK P 2.42 acres P 1.29 acroa _ PL'MmE FISF]tEli Y 4 i RETAIL 4.00 acrom 0.81 acres 2 \ t RETRY 2.1 acres t I t C ETAIL CENTE 3 5 1a:n5 cariic RErAI HO TEL/RETAIL 1 —� - - j 1.ti setae 211 acres acres RETAIL 5.49 acres P 1.'LI Oct.. STATE HWY. N too. 13 P 2.99 acres PaaO 14 �!' G— RETAIL 4.61 acres �Q 1 r /--- II --->t t- -I 1- -I 22 15 1 --1 I--•1 RETAIL 1 --{ 1---1 HOME ( i acres IMPRO`IEMEIIT P 0 50 acres 22 0 acres 16 RETAIL 1.67 acrma P te' RETAIL \ �\ 2.69 acres L_� -_ � I t-� • ° • \ S�� �� 7 P 0.71 acres _ • A — - \ 4 <" RETAIL 1 8 \ acroa HGHWAY COLOAERCIAL ®Utiot 12.89 acres �I 1=1 a PARR p' ` 13 76 acres P 1.12 acres 4 1 — ci 1 9 1 5L Y. 1 / RETAIL I HIEATRE m a \ w \ 7.7 acres 1 _ e 8 -22 �Q �\ 6\ \ a \\ P i It acres d COMMERCIAL 5ERVICES V _� ® \ I 0 J P ® N. aces 10 rcElAll,r, WCHWAt COMMERCIAL " y - -11 I� 11 (' 7.15 a.49 P 0.75 acres / W ' COt7 acre 24 RETAIL y ti" BL OCK 0 7.0 acres l \� ,' Ca / ummERCIAL SERNCES 91, n � `� r '/ \ \ \ / '11 acre: u P 0.44 octet Of / • COULITCIAL >u SP ACE. BOLING RINGS LANE SER�T r , TAIL. �� �j `. Q I 120 acroa � HICIIWA'i oc= d 7.0 acres �� WALit,1<r 1AL P I 064 scree �16 y P 1.04 acroa 13 / i >� / 1 26 MULTIPLE FAMILY / / // COLIMEHCIAL SERMCE5 I s y 7.2 acres If a r IF r % acroa `�`�LLL.. IIII 21 uU,.u6�:P u!JU T82 a 31', 35 " RerAIL MULTIPLE FAMILY "RI. 2.15 au" 6.6 acres 7 _ 7.15 coos - — - j l 1 - IIIGLL AA II.tI 1 -- - - 1 �\ •. \. 3 \ 'O l 10 9 u 2 1 1 36 11 �� 7 1 MUI IIPit IAI III.I' 12 6 ® 13 � '•� 15 - It, 9PZZYOtt U cc tc U 1 \ \ / 1 614 15 6 17 / 11 IJ 12 11 lu 9 G \ . \ Zia 1� 3 1ti \ 25 � X PARK 24 \ • 2u\ L] 2 21 ! -__ 4 : ,•:res \ 7 20 19 I8 17 16 l4 13 2 \\ 0 125 250 500 -- �• JANUARY, 1999 LEGEND EXISTIH(-, EAST DEAN LAI'F IIT.UNK SANITARY =,EWER y ,t, to I 1 I . • PROPOSED LATERAL SANH ARY SI= WI_".R PROPOSED LIFT STATION PROPOSED FORCEMAIN l EXISTING CAPPED LANDFILLS WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING FNGINEFRS CHA MIFIFIES01 A t)531 N 40'/14 ,Oo ® Y iv 6 Baum 200'/540' Q, ! ..Mpm mom woo CR- cr 0 7 H ty 1 OK CA ML ul 2020 BACKGROUND DAILYTRAFFIC /DEVELOPMENT DAILYTRAFFIC/TOTAL DAILY DUFFIC '- .: CITY OF SHAKOPEE 2020 DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES SHAKOPEE CROSSINGS c� I `SYO•v 1►000,�0 v0 PHASE 1 2000 PHASE IV 2003 PHASE II 2001 PHASE V 2004 PHASE III 2002 e ��OIISO PHASE III PHASE V j PHASE PHASE PHASE V PHASE IV PHASE III PHASE VI DEVELOPMENT PHASING PHASE 1 2000 PHASE IV 2003 PHASE II 2001 PHASE V 2004 PHASE III 2002 PHASE VI 2005 PHASE 11 NORTH L7---T 0 100200 400 FEET DAHLGREN, SHARDLOW, AND UBAN, INC. NOVEMBER 25,1998 gum ► ••_- Crossings • Detailed Responses This section contains copies of the comments received during the public comment period, together with specific responses. In order to facilitate this communication, the paragraphs in the original written comments have been identified with number, and in some circumstances, are followed by a CAPITAL letter. The letters do not relate to the lower case letters used to separate issues in the AUAR In some cases, the numbers do match the AUAR numbering system if the numbers were used by the original author. City of Shakopee, Minnesota Shakopee Crossings — Revised A UAR Response to Paragraph No. 2: The City concurs that any work having an impact on MNDOT right -of -way will require a MNDOT permit, and will direct developers to seek the appropriate permit(s). Response to Paragraph No. 3: The confusion occurred because the development statistics presented on page 6 in the AUAR are different from the development statistics presented in the traffic report in the Appendix. In follow - through with Elizabeth Blodgett of the Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban, Inc. firm, we have confirmed that the development statistics and trip calculations presented in the traffic report were correct. The confusion occurred because of an error in the table of development statistics presented on page 6 in the Draft AUAR. As provided by the DSU firm, the corrected table of development statistics is enclosed. Response to Paragraph No. 4: Work within Minnesota State Aid (VISA) routes will be reviewed by the City in accordance with State Aid rules and policies. Where projects within the study area may involve work within a County State Aid Highway (CSAH) route, the City will seek the input of the County to insure that State Aid rules and policies are followed. Response to Paragraph No. S: The City has, and will continue to work with, the project proposer to locate uses that are less impacted by highway noise adjacent to the adjacent and future highways. In addition, the City's plat review process will require that the project proposer conduct a noise analysis, and construct mitigation measures called for by the analysis. Page 2 -1 City of Shakopee, Minnesota Shakopee Crossings — Revised A UAR dJ/1i/ZUU1J iz:l'z bi2 51LVtN L) -)ULIAU I Aut 08/2z100 13:3a YAX 512 337-5U01 Dbu, INC. Shokopee CmSzings Draft AUAR AP61 1999 MEME The cumulative totals of the parameters called for should be given for each major development'scen Number of Residential Units: Unatuched: 62-89 units Attached: 303-308 units CommerciaUindustfiallinstitutionaI Building Area (gross floor space in total square feet). 8 Use Gross Floor Space Office: Manufacturing*: ........................ .............................. Rotail: ....................................................................... 876,000 Other Industrial*: -------------------------- ..........................0 Warehouse: ......................................................................... 0 Institutional* . ........... ........................ I ................................ Li,& hidustrial: ............................................................ z , I ...... 0 Ag;ricuJt=al ...... ................................................... ........... 0 Other Commercial (specify) total:.... ........................521,000 Commercial Retail ................ ........................ H ome Improvement ............ ...........................216, 000 Highway Commercial ................................... 148,000 Restaurant (2) ................................................. 10 Building Height(s)* ....................As governed by Ordinance o ptional to include areas for these 8 '! MRiNESOTA POLLUTTON CONTROL AGENCY COMMENTS Commenter: Barbara Conti, Planner Principal/Operations and Planning Section/Metro District Comment ate: June 14, 2000 Response to Paragraph 2, Items I and 2: Item 1 relates to the tables of CO concentrations being identical for both the 1 -hour and 8 -hour values. Attached is a copy of the text on vehicle emissions that David Braslau Associates, Inc. provided for the AUAR. This data includes both the 1 -hour and 8 -hour tables. Both of the tables in the draft AUAR contain only the values from the 8 -hour table. The 1 -hour values from the attached Table 23.1 should be used to replace the values in Table 7 on page 38 of the Draft AUAR. Item 2 relates to the parking supply and which portion of the supply is for commercial lands and which is for residential land uses. David Braslau Associates, Inc. reviewed parking requirements using the ITE Parking Generation Manual, the Shakopee zoning requirements, and a simplified application of the Shakopee zoning requirements. The ITE estimates are well below those required by the Shakopee zoning ordinance and therefore have not been considered further. A simple application of the Zoning code on gross square footage assumptions results in 9,106 parking stalls required for the commercial land uses and 784 for the residential. The total of 9,890 is less than the AUAR draft quantity, but the proponent prefers to reserve use of the higher figure of 10,434 for AUAR, traffic and Indirect Source Permit Application is preferred as a "worst case scenario ". It is believed that the 10,434 originates from traffic analysis which preceded this AUAR Response to Paragraph 2, Item 3: The City of Shakopee is under the impression that the project proposer has calculated the total number of required parking spaces based on the City's current parking requirements. A copy of the required parking ratios accompanies this response. Response to Paragraph 3, Traffic Analysis: The City of Shakopee concurs that the Stage 1 and Stage 2 roadway improvements will be necessary to accommodate traffic generation from the project area. The staging and construction of these improvements is largely under the control of Scott County. The City will work with Scott County, MNDOT, and the project proposer to implement those improvements in a timely fashion. Page 2 -2 City of Shakopee, Minnesota Shakopee Crossings — Revised A UAR U7! 111 GUUU 1L. 1G OlL-- OJL - -UOU7 JIGVGIY L JULIHU r'HUG G7 AUG 31 2000 17:15 FR D SRASLAU ASSOC 6123314572 TO 8320609 P.02/04 23. Vebicle- related allr emissions With 10,434 parting spaces, Shakopee Crossings will require an Indirect Source )Pminit from the Minnesota Pollution Coutrol Agency. An air quality analysis has been performed for critical intersections that carry access traffic to and from the project. Summary results of that analy9ls are presented here, A detailed discussion of methodology, assumptions, and results will be included in the 1b4irmt Srnuce Permit .A,p %Cation. Results of the air quality analysis for Carbon Monoxide (CO) are presented. in Table 23.1 (1 -hour CO eCmcenlratiions) and Table 23.2 (S -hour CO concentrations). Table 23.11 Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (1 -hour) at Critical Intersections serving Sh2kopee Crossings (maximum concentrations by intersection at receptor sites 100 feet from intersection) A.11 Concentrations in pmts pet million (ppm) Table 23.2 Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (8 -hour) at Critical Intersections serving Shakopee Crossings (Max concentratlons by intersection at receptor sites 100 feet from intersection) All Concentratioas in parts per million (ppm) I -,hour CO Cmcmtratio:is includin onnd (including and 2003 2006 2006 NO Bernd BUW1l Increase No Build Build Inerewo CEO lalsoathhrid e 4.1 7.1 3.0 5.7 8,7 3.0 NW SRE5 Df B/Souibbridge 3.5 4.7 1.2 4.4 4,7 0.3 NB /South Site Dc /Sout6brid a 3.8 4.8 LO 7.2 $.7 -1.5 CSAH 18 /CSAH 89 3.8 4.2 0.4 4.4 4.4 OA CSAH 181CSAH 16 3.9 4.3 0.5 4.6 4.8 02 CSAH 18 /C8A H 16 S 3.71 4.2 0.5 4.41 4,41 0.0 MPCA $TANP7ARD WCA STANDARD 1 30.0 9.0 30.0 1 9.0 Table 23.2 Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (8 -hour) at Critical Intersections serving Shakopee Crossings (Max concentratlons by intersection at receptor sites 100 feet from intersection) All Concentratioas in parts per million (ppm) M= intersection of Sauthbridge Parkway and CSAH 19 is expected to experieucc the highest 1- hour and 8- rioter CO o=centratio= as well as The highest increase in CO concentrations from the No -Build to Build condition in both W03 (Stage 1) and 2006 (Stage 2). Increases in CO W 9-h= CO Conceatratl ns (including and 2003 2006 No Baitd SWd Iocreuso No Build Ruildl Incrmse CSAH IRISog d c 27 4.8 211 3.8 59 21 NW Silo Dr Bjftthbridge 2.3 3.1 0.8 2.9 3.1 02 NEIS00th Site Dr /Southtxid a 2.5 3.2 0.7 g 3.8 -i.l CSAH 1 89 2.5 2.8 0.3 2.9 2.9 0.0 CSAH 18 /CSAH 16 2.5 2.8 0,4 3.l 3.2 0.1 CSAH A8 /G 16 S) 2. 2.8 .4 2.9 2.9 0.0 WCA STANDARD 9.0 1 9.0 M= intersection of Sauthbridge Parkway and CSAH 19 is expected to experieucc the highest 1- hour and 8- rioter CO o=centratio= as well as The highest increase in CO concentrations from the No -Build to Build condition in both W03 (Stage 1) and 2006 (Stage 2). Increases in CO W r , .w a� r RUG 31 2080 17:15 FR D BRRSLAU ASSOC t <qo �� tD 4? t i to tP f� d Q w C6 6 t0 (a w C'7 m M -79�IE, r t� dQ 4 Cif lf� � N N r t t 6123314572 TO 8320603 cn 'x m N C � O E F` c .m *mt TOTAL PAGE . 0d * "< '© Response to Paragraph 4, AirQuality Analysis — Traffic: Please refer to the response to Paragraph 2, Item 1 above and the material provided by David Braslau Associates, Inc. The proponent agrees with the notation in the second paragraph in this section. Response to Paragraph S: The City reiterates its response to Paragraph 3, Traffic Analysis. Response to Paragraph 6: The City concurs with the need to encourage alternatives to single - occupancy vehicles. The issue of providing trails and sidewalks will be addressed through the City's plat review process and design criteria. The City is an "alternative transit provider", and its services (including dial -a -ride and van pooling) will be available to residents and employees of the area. Response to Paragraphs 7 and 8: The AUAR has been revised to include the requirement of a National Pollutant Elimination System Permit. The City of Shakopee has entered into an agreement with the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District that requires rigorous control of discharge rates and volumes from development sites. Techniques to be used to achieve the target rates and volumes will include ponding, depressional storage and infiltration. Response to Paragraph 9, General: For several months, the City of Shakopee has been developing an -ordinance whose purposes would be 1) to encourage the preservation of significant stands of trees, 2) to require replacement where preservation is not possible. Action by the City Council on this ordinance proposal is expected soon. The City agrees that the employment of other techniques, such as building clustering, are desirable, and would work with the project proposer to facilitate such techniques. Page 2-4 City of Shakopee, Minnesota Shakopee Crossings — Revised A UAR 1 11 COMAMNTS Commenter: Bill Johnson for Thomas W. Balcom, Supervisor/Environmental Planning and Review Section Comment ate: June 14, 2000 Response to Paragraph No. 1: The City is in the process of reviewing a proposed ordinance whose purpose is to encourage woodland preservation, or require replacement or significant trees removed in excess of those permitted under the ordinance. The City has enlisted the services of a professional forester to assist in this effort. Once adopted, the proposed regulations would apply to the study area as it develops. Response to Paragraph No. 2: Preservation of Gopher Snake (Pituophis catenifer) habitat within the context of the project boundaries would not be prudent. The area is surrounded by a network of high volume, high speed roadways and also contains an internal roadway circulation system. Gopher snakes are terrestrial and travel throughout their habitat overland. They are vulnerable to highway mortality. An adult, killed on TH 169 in the vicinity of the project area, was reported to the MnDNR on October 18, 1997. Site management for gopher snakes would be difficult. The resulting fragmentation of the habitat from the proposed development is not the best habitat even if some open patches were preserved. The snakes would be vulnerable to mortality on internal and external roadways. They rely on existing animal burrows for shelter which likely would not exist in the post development condition. Their diet consists primarily of small rodents which would occur in limited supply due to the reduced habitat base. Although listed as a species of special concern in Minnesota, the species is widely distributed across the western United States and is a popular household pet for reptile fanciers. The Internet lists numerous sites describing the care and feeding of Gopher Snakes. Petutopia lists various recommended foods for gopher snakes. The Minnesota River Valley National Wildlife Refuge just north of TH 169 extends approximately 40 miles upstream from the junction of the Minnesota and Mississippi Rivers at Fort Snelling. The river valley provides a complex of habitats suitable for the gopher snake and its prey species. The Refuge provides for the permanent protection and management of habitats. The Minnesota River Valley and components of the Refuge lie just across TH 169 from the proposed project so that the region in general will not be devoid of suitable habitat. A successful nest site was reported to the NInDNR on July 28, 1997. The nest site was located within the Rice Lake Unit of the Minnesota River Valley National Wildlife Refuge. Page 2 -5 City of Shakopee, Minnesota Shakopee Crossings — Revised A UAR Less is known about the habits and habitat of the Plains Pocket Mouse (Perognathus f7avescens) although general information is available. It inhabits open areas with sparse vegetation and with sandy soil. Its diet consists mostly of small seeds. Breeding occurs between April and July; 2 litters per year are born with average litter size being 4 - 5 young. One reported observation was close to the AUAR study area; this area is currently under development for residential housing. Suitable habitat for this species does appear to exist on the AUAR site. Isolated populations may remain but fragmentation of the habitat will likely result in the eventual demise of the population even if suitable habitat pockets were preserved. The limited mobility of the species (home range of about 0.1 acre, 4,356 square feet) would severely limit population exchange and genetic variability. Habitat management for the species by the preservation or creation of habitat pockets would meet with limited, if any, success. Page 2-6 City of Shakopee, Minnesota Shakopee Crossings — Revised A UAR COMMENTS Commenter: Brian K. Sorenson, Transportation Engineer Comment Date: June 14, 2000 Response to Paragraph No. 1: The project proposer indicates that they do not, and the AUAR did not intend, that the referenced locations along CSAH 18 be the sole access points along this roadway for the development. During subsequent steps in the development process, consideration may be given to additional access locations. The City of Shakopee is the RGU for purposes of the Wetland Conservation Act. As the RGU, the City requires specific wetland delineation as a part of the subdivision process. Response to Paragraph No. 2: The revised AUAR has been corrected to reflect the anticipated timing of CSAH 21. Response to Paragraph No. 3: The AUAR did not intend that the referenced locations along CSAH 18 be the sole access points along this roadway for the development. During subsequent steps in the development process, consideration may be given to additional access locations. Page 2 -7 City of Shakopee, Minnesota Shakopee Crossings — Revised A UAR RESPONSES TO SCOTT COUNTY ENVI[RONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Commentor: Allen Frechette, Environmental Health Manager Comment Date: June 13, 2000 Response to Paragraph No. 1, 2, and 3: The City of Shakopee is the RGU for purposes of the Wetland Conservation Act. As the RGU, the City requires specific wetland delineation as a part of the subdivision process. The AUAR process is used where there is not a specific proposal for development that sets forth such things as building location, parking location, specific access points, etc. Without such a specific proposal, it is not possible to anticipate all potential wetland impacts. Instead the AUAR process requires that, in order to remain valid as an "EIS substitute ", the AUAR adequately address the level of development and level of impact from that development. If a future impact to wetlands is found to be significant enough to be outside the scope of the current AUAR, State rules permit the updating of the AUAR analysis. Response to Paragraphs 5 and 6. The City of Shakopee is aware of the County and State Geological information for this area, and has been, and will continue to be mindful of the County's recommendations regarding lined retention ponds. These recommendations are taken together with a concern that has been expressed by the County and the MNDNR in the past that water needs to be allowed to percolate as well. As a result the City is exploring the use of 2- cell retention ponds in this and other areas of the City. In addition, the City and Lower Minnesota River Watershed District have entered into an agreement governing the types of controls to be implemented in this area of the City. Response to Paragraph No. 7: It is believed that Scott County has previous approved a "no action letter" on the noted sites. Any further action on these sites can be handled as a part of the City's subdivision review process. Response to Paragraph 8: The response to Paragraphs 5 and 6 is reiterated. Response to Paragraph 9: The response to Paragraph No. 7 is reiterated. Response to Paragraph No. 10: Page 2 -8 City of Shakopee, Minnesota Shakopee Crossings — Revised A UAR Response to Paragraph No. 11: The comment does not clearly specify what geographic area is meant by "the Valley," but as the comment refers to industrially developed site, it would appear that it calls for analysis outside the project area under review. As a result, the review is outside the scope of the AUAR. The AUAR does include the analysis on emissions that was done for the project area. The City would be open to discussion a future study at the instance of the County and with the concurrence of the MPCA and possibly the Metropolitan Council. Response to Paragraph No. 12: - The larger questions of future water supply in Shakopee and northern Scott County are outside the scope of the AUAR. They are currently being addressed through multiple efforts including the Ground Water Work Group, communication with the MNDNR, and the City's development review processes. Page 2 -10 City of Shakopee, Minnesota Shakopee Crossings —RevisedAUAR SECTION 3: Mitigation Plan This Mitigation Plan is submitted as a part of the Alternate Urban Area -wide Review (AUAR) process to provide reviewers, regulators, and prospective tenants or purchasers of land with an understanding of the actions necessary to protect the environment and limit impacts by the proposed project. Many of the potential environmental impacts within the project boundary are associated with specific improvements, activities and operations of landowners and/or tenants who will choose to locate within Shakopee Crossings. The primary mechanism for mitigation of environmental impacts is the effective use of existing codes, rules, and regulations. The enforcement options available under these codes, rules, and regulations include: ■ Execution of a developer(s) agreement(s) that under the City of Shakopee's subdivision ordinance ■ Approval of a planned unit development (PUD), that includes specific requirements ■ Enforcement of the permitting requirements of all applicable local, state, and federal agencies ■ Require submission of performance bonds ■ Initiation of civil suits and/or restraining orders This mitigation plan is organized into three levels: 1. Goals — At this level the mitigation plan defines broad concepts or purposes to be achieved in the project area. 2. Strategies - This level identifies strategies that will be used to help achieve the goals. 3. Actions - This level lists key activities that can or will be employed to achieve the associated goal(s). Page 3 -1 GOAL 1: Fulfill the public's expectations for the character of the City of Shakopee as Expressed by the City's comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, etc. Strategies: 1. Implementation of City comprehensive plan policies and enforcement of City codes and policies. Actions: A. Execution of a development agreement(s) between the City of Shakopee and the owners and/or developers of the project area, which agreement would incorporate requirements of the City's codes and policies in place at the time of execution of the agreement. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee and the owner /developer(s) of the Shakopee Crossings project area. B. Execution of performance bonds, or other security, to provide surety to the City that all necessary requirements are met (e.g. criteria for public streets and utilities, landscaping or planting requirements). The amount(s) of security shall be as required by the development agreement(s). Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee, the owner /developer(s) of the Shakopee Crossings project area. C. Enforcement by all governing authorities of their respective rules, regulations, and terms of development agreements. Responsible Parties: All appropriate agencies (including, but not limited to, the City of Shakopee, Lower Minnesota River Watershed District, Minnesota Department of Transportation). D. Amendments to, or modification of, the relevant comprehensive plans, ordinances, and/or policies that would affect mitigation on the subject site must be subject to appropriate review and approval by the appropriate governing agencies and authorities. These reviews should include opportunities for the public to comment, including public hearings. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee, Scott County, various State and Federal agencies, and special districts. GOAL 2: Preserve groundwater quality and surface water quality of Dean's Lake. Protection Strategies: 1. Consider the establishment of a watershed district for the entire Blue Lake watershed as delineated in the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. Responsible Parties: All appropriate agencies. 2. Provide testing of the current water quality to define the background water quality. Page 3 -2 Action Required: A. Make all records and results related to water quality available to the City, Scott County, the B. DNR, and the watershed district, if created. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee, MNDNR, or the water district, if created. C. Conduct annual testing of water quality in the watershed to determine the extent of change in quality, if any. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee, MNDNR, or the water district, if created. D. Periodically, test both the on -site and the off -site runoff reaching the Lake to help identify the sources of any pollutants. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee, MNDNR, or the water district, if created. 2. Limit and control degradation of the water quality reaching Dean's Lake. Action Required: A. Enforcement of the City's Comprehensive Storm water Management Plan including adherence to the Best Management Practices (BMP's) for storm water. B. Continue the cooperative relationship of all public and private agencies within the Dean's Lake watershed (6,900 acres). 3. Increase public awareness of the effects of residential and agricultural fertilizers on water quality. Action Required: A. Develop and conduct periodic educational programs for residents. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee and all public agencies with water quality authority within the watershed. GOAL 3: Limit the impacts of traffic generated by activities within the project area. Protection Strategies: Identify high traffic activities to be conducted within the project area. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee, individual lot purchasers and building tenants. Action Required: Require the necessary information as a part of the initial development or building permit review process. In the event that traffic levels higher than those identified in the AUAR are expected, this would include a site traffic impact study that would encompass the access points on Co. Rd 18 and CSAH 16, and include the existing traffic on these roadways at the time of lot development. 2. Monitor changes in owner /tenant traffic activity level and implement necessary changes to the City's Page 3 -3 transportation system. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee, individual lot purchasers and building tenants. Action Required: Require the necessary information as a part of the building permit request process for remodeling and alterations. 3. Monitor traffic generation on the adjacent roadways generated by the development and/or modification of adjacent developments. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee, Scott County, Mn/DOT, Met Council and other interested agencies. 4. Continue to develop and complete the proposed improvements of collector and arterial roadways in the surrounding area. Action Required: A.Implement the construction /reconstruction / relocation of CSAH 16, CR 21, CR 83 and 17 Avenue. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee, Scott County, Mn/DOT, Met Council and other interested agencies. 5. Monitor and update the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, when necessary. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee GOAL 4: Limit the noise impacts of development and adjacent roadways on adjacent or nearby residential properties. Protection Strategies: 1. Separate the issues of noise generation from initial construction, noise generation from US 169 and noise generation from tenant activity. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee, Mn/DOT, individual lot purchasers and building tenants. 2. Rigorous enforcement of the City's ordinances regarding noise generation. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee, individual lot purchasers and building tenants. 3. Limit hours of construction activity and allowable construction noise. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee. 4. Encourage tree planting along street boulevards within the project site. Page 3-4 Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee and the developer. 5. Encourage landscaping and screening of individual building sites to reduce noise transmission. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee, individual lot purchasers and building tenants. GOAL 5: Limit the air quality impacts of traffic generated by the development and the activities of individual building owners or tenants. Protection Strategies: 1. Regulate air emissions through enforcement of State Air Quality Standards Action Required: A. Comply with the parameters for Indirect Source Permits (ISP). Responsible Parties: Minnesota Pollution Control Administration MPCA), City of Shakopee B. Minimize dust generation during construction activities. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee, Scott County, property owners) /developer(s), Shakopee Crossings, individual lot purchasers and building tenants. Z. Monitor changes in owner /tenant air emissions potential. Action Required: A. Require information on emissions potential as a part of the building permit request process for remodeling and alterations. Responsible Parties: City of Shakopee, MPCA and building tenants. Page 3 -5 i u a T: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R Michael Leer Community Development Director SUBJECT: Waiver of Subdivision Criteria MEETING DATE: September 19, 2000 01 David Siwek has requested waiver of the criteria for minor subdivisions that requires that the land to be subdivided be previously platted. The City received an application from Mr. Siwek for residential property located 850 Holmes Street. Initially the application was incomplete because a property survey did not accompany the application. When the survey was received, it came to light that the property was not previously platted. In order to proceed with the minor subdivision application would require a waiver of a portion of the ordinance as it relates to minor subdivisions. Such requests are infrequent, but have been granted by the Council in the past. Section 12.21 MINOR SUBDIVISIONS., Subd. 2. states that minor subdivisions are prohibited when: A Where the subdivision includes a change in existing streets, alleys, water, sanitary or storm sewer, or other public improvements. B. Where additional right -of -way needs to be dedicated, and the right -of -way has not been previously been deeded to the City. C. Where easements need to be changed for the subdivision, and the appropriate changes have not been made through vacation and/or deeding of easements to the City. D. Where new streets, utilities, or other public improvements will be needed other then to directly serve the lots created and to provide a direct connection to an existing and approved system. E. Where the proposed minor subdivision involves any unplatted property F. Where the proposed minor subdivision involves unusual elements, policy decisions, that the Planner determines require detailed review. This proposal would require a waiver of item E. Attached for the Council's information is a copy of the submitted survey. 1. Approve the request to waive subdivision criteria. 2. Do not approve the request to waive subdivision criteria. 3. Table the matter and request additional information from staff and/or the applicant. FITS F 1 t 1 Offer a motion consistent with the Council's preferred approach, and move its approval. R Michael Leek Community Development Director i:\commdev\cc\2000\cc09l9\waiversiwelcdoc FoR �LoG_K tiOB, SNAKOVE _ 19o.9co bng.,�x-E saaTN��as o� 41.00 NO271'µJEST �.uRUE1Z of o 25 �,O � 4 a J - N_ O �C? G a I n I i i ;K''2v4so - P• l 1UP) -73 I 211.54 N S9 ° 43`' 24 E —� C�EVs's �7 kl)D �D� nP _. _... s�tNGs ARE ASSltw1F��Q SUP,1F_�r : � Et13E��EU'C • oF `2FeoPD �F Aar 0 QEn1OTr.5 SET OP_ Fov.ap MD, PIPE MDi AEVJT5 That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 115, Range 23, Scott County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the intersection -f -the. Southerly extension. of the " Easterly line of Block 108, Sha -with the North line of - said - - Northeast Quarter; thence Southeasterly along the Westerly line of Holmes Street extended a distance of 113.40 feet; thence Westerly parallel with said North line a distance of 169.73 feet to the intersection with a line drawn Southerly parallel with the East line of said Northeast Quarter, from the Northwest corner of the East •half of said Northeast Quarter, thence Northerly parallel with said East line a distance of '109.3 feet more or less to the Northwest corner of said East half of the Northeast Quarter; thence Easterly along the North line of said..East half.of.the Northeast Quarter:a distance of 148:78 feet to the point of beginning; also That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 115, Range 23, Scott County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of the East half of the Northeast 1. Quarter of said Section 12; thence Southerly parallel with the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 109.33 feet more or less to the-Northerly line of Lot'l, Block 1, GEIS'S 1ST ADDITIONF, as monumented thence Westerly along said monumented line a distance of 41.8 feet more or less to the East line of the plat of JASPER AND SMITH ADDITION TO SHAKOPEE, as monumented; thence Northerly along said east line as monumented a distanc`r 110 feet more or less to the North line of said North2ast thence Easterly'alorig'the North line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 41 feet more or less to the point of beginning. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries Of She AoV¢ du- SC•Y'�bea proPot�i�� th S (',pTT County. Minnesota'as on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for said County. That I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under'the Laws of the State of• Minnesota. - Dated: !0' Allan R. Hastings D � Registration No. 17009 212 First Avenue East AUG 2 Goo AUG 2 D Suite No. C Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone 612 445 4027 _W ton OR zuRvey r uV 1 t" t� ?)9 41.0D IVOQT�y►FST NzuE2 4 12 g.o .s N .� a _ Z6.0 1 4�.� �► 1(c),73 2 ti 1.54 P�1 g9 ° 4 )'- 2-4,. E _ P10e.e M L \uF O�' .. -- •�15`S 15T' . tJL� eTo r.1 EIS` O�I�ID Q OU An o h_3D �a bEW -t Gs R.E SuR>JF�7 : rQ_ OF t?.FeoPp 1F P,att 0 Q)ewq SF_ OP_ FovrNO `RDkJ PIPE MO1.1uMrclJ That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 115, Range 23, Scott County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the intersection -of - -the- •Southerly extension• of the.-.-- • Easterly line of Block 108, Shakopee,-with the-North-line of-said- Northeast Quarter; thence Southeasterly along the Westerly line of Holmes Street extended a distance of 113.40 feet; thence Westerly parallel with said North line a distance of 169.73 feet to the intersection with a line drawn Southerly parallel with the East line of said Northeast Quarter, from the Northwest corner of the East half of said Northeast Quarter, thence Northerly parallel with said East line a distance of?109.3 feet more or less'to the Northwest corner of said East half of the Northeast Quarter; thence Easterly along the North line of said - -.East half�of.the Northeast Quarter, .'.a distance of 148:78 feet to the point of beginning; also That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 115, Range 23, Scott County, Minnesota described,as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of the East half of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 12; thence Southerly parallel with the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of.109.33 feet more or less to the-Northerly line of Lot Block 1, GEIS'S 1ST A.DDITIOI? as monumented thence Westerly along said monumented line a distance of 41.8 feet more or less to the East line of the plat of JASPER AND SMITH ADDITION TO SHAKOPEE, as monumented; thence Northerly along said east line as monumented'a distancg',df 110 feet more or less to the North line of said Northeast_ Quarter; thence Easterly'alorig North line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 41 feet more or less to the point of beginning. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries Of ��e U,7 °ve �QSGr �ro�Pr�`` �h b-V7 County, innesota'as on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for said County. That I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the Laws of the State of :.Minnesota. Dated: Allan R. Hastings VA 2 3 loon Minnesota Registration No. 17009 zit First Avenue East Aur j �000 Suite No. C J Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Phone 612 445 4027 /Z , F CITY OF SHAK ®PEE Memorandum TO: Mayor & City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Authorize Quotes for Sewer Televising DATE: September 19, 2000 The Public Works Department has received two quotes for the televising of 23,000 linear feet of main line sanitary sewer and 10,000 linear feet of River District trunk sewer cleaning and televising. M m Televising main line sanitary sewers is a vital function in the maintenance of sanitary sewers throughout our community. It is important to keep indexed inspection logs and videotapes of the conditions of our sanitary sewer infrastructure. By televising our sewer mains we will be able to utilize our maintenance dollars in the areas that are more critical in defects such as roots, sags, offset joints, protruding taps and cracked or missing pipe. The Public Works Department feels that a program of televising 30,000 L.F. of main line sanitary sewer each year will keep us informed of the changing conditions of our sanitary sewer infrastructure. This year's program includes 23,000 linear feet of sanitary sewer in possible future street reconstruction areas and the River District trunk sewer. The two quotes for televising 23,000 L.F. of main line sanitary sewers are as follows: 1. Infratech - $0.37 per foot or $8,510.00 2. Visu -Sewer Clean & Seal, Inc. - $0.34 per foot or $7,820.00. Staff is recommending authorizing the televising work to Visu -Sewer Clean & Seal, Inc. Also, staff did receive quotes for the cleaning and televising of the River District trunk sewer along the Minnesota River as follows: 1. Infratech - $2.35/L.F. for 10,000 L.F. or $23,500.00 or $175.00/Hr for cleaning and $165.00/Hr. for televising 2. Visu-S ewer Clean & Seal, Inc. - $165.00/Hr. for cleaning or televising Based on the quotes received, Visu -Sewer Clean & Seal, Inc. has the low quote and has done acceptable work for the 1999 sewer televising. Staff believes that televising the River District trunk sewer by the hour is the most fair way to pay for this work, due to the difficult access and unknown debris in cleaning this line. Also, with the low river level and Rahr Malting using their own sewage treatment plant, this is the opportune time to check the condition of the line. Staff would request authorization up to $20,00.00 to clean and televise the River District trunk sewer line. Information received from this effort will determine the best corrective work in maintaining and/or repairing this trunk sewer line. 1. Accept the low quote from Visu -Sewer Clean & Seal, Inc. for $0.34 per L.F. to televise 23,000 feet of main line sanitary sewer and $165.00/Hr. for cleaning or televising the River District trunk sewer. 2. Do not accept the low quote from Visu -Sewer Clean & Seal, Inc. 3. Authorize staff to expend up to $20,000.00 to clean and televise the River District trunk sewer line. 4. Table for additional information Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 and No. 3. The cost of televising mainline sanitary sewers would be from the Sanitary Sewer Enterprise Fund - Professional Services. Also, the information received will help determine future reconstruction project areas and corrective work to maintain sanitary sewer. Make a motion accepting the low quote received from Visu -Sewer Clean & Seal, Inc. to televise 23,000 L.F. of main line sanitary sewer at a cost of $0.34 L.F. and $165.00/Hr. for cleaning and televising River District trunk sewer, and a maximum expenditure amount not -to- exceed $27,820.00 without further authorization. AUU- of Bruce Loney Public Works Director BL /pmp TELEVISE ls, CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor & City Council Bruce Loney, Public Works Director /Acting City Administrator FROM: Joel Rutherford, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Valley Park 6"' Addition —Pond Construction DATE: September 19, 2000 '11 f On August 15, 2000, the City Council authorized staff to advertise for quotes for the excavation of a pond needed in the Valley Park 6' Addition. The project was advertised, and one quote was received. The proposed pond excavation is for Outlot A within the Valley Park 6' Addition. This outlot is owned by the City of Shakopee and was always intended to be used for a pond. Recently the City was informed of two contractors /developers who needed fill material for their sites. Staff believed this would be a good time to get the pond excavated, if the City could get the excavation work completed for a favorable price. The City advertised for quotes in the "Shakopee Valley News ", and prepared plans and specifications. In addition to the excavation work for the pond, other items were required including tree removal, placement of a clay liner at the bottom of the pond, and restoring the site with 6" of topsoil. In order to keep costs as low as possible, staff proposes to seed the site when completed, and to plant any trees necessary to comply with the Tree Preservation Ordinance, if one is adopted. On September 13, 2000, the City received one quote for $49,000 to do the work, from the Contractor for Valley Green Business Park. DISCUSSION: Although the quote of $49,000 is higher than expected, staff believes the quoted price is lower than if quoted or bid during a time when fill material was not needed in the area. Staff estimates the total amount of excavation is about 20,000 cubic yards. Because this material would need to be hauled off -site and disposed of, staff believes the cost would be about $3.00 or more, per cubic yard, for just the excavation work. The cost to bring in 6" of topsoil for the entire site (about 1,500 cubic yards) is estimated to be around $3.00 to $6.00 per cubic yard. If the project were quoted or bid at a time when fill material is not needed in the area, the estimated cost for the project would be $80,000 or more. If the Council authorizes awarding this project to Valley Green Business Park/Northwest Asphalt, the funds for this project would come from the Storm Drainage Fund. When the Storm Water Utility Fee was adopted, Valley Park 6' Addition, and the area adjacent to it, was one of the targeted areas that were to receive improvements from the fee collected (see attached). The estimated costs for all the storm sewer improvements to this area (as estimated in about 1985) were $450,000. Therefore, staff recommends that the Council accept the quote for $49,000 to construct the pond. Approve a motion for the appropriate City officials to award the project to Valley Green Business Park/Northwest Asphalt for the pond excavation in Valley Park 6 t " Addition, in the amount of $49,000.00. 2. Do not award the project. 3. Table this item for additional information Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. 1 1 M Approve a motion for the appropriate City officials to award the project to Valley Green Business Park/Northwest Asphalt for the pond excavation in Valley Park 6 Addition, in the amount of $49,000.00. /JT,,,ltherford Assistant City Engineer h .. i. I i r • l i • • •f ' • + • i H • i' •' • Ir • • • • • U) -i U) U - g Q W W Z W F-.. C\l LO J Q J J W V W CC CL ® z F- Z 0 U) F t W fr W co u) W J Q OC < o- aL Q —� W "=C cr- r • • • •f ' • + • H • i' •' • • • • • • i f 0 C\l LO •f I • t 0 co • 9 @ B CITY OF SAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor & City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Consider Ordering Feasibility Report for the Reconstruction of C.R. 83 and the Realignment of C.R. 16 in Conjunction with the Proposed Valley Green Corporate Center DATE: September 19, 2000 9 1 City staff and County staff have met to determine what the next course of action should be in regard to County road improvements associated with the Valley Green Corporate Center proposal. It has been determined that the next best course of action is to have a feasibility report prepared on the reconstruction of CSAH 83, from 12 Avenue to %2 mile south of existing CSAH 16 intersection; and for the reconstruction and realignment of CSAH 16, from 1400 feet west of CSAH 83 to 2200 feet east of CSAH 83. The purpose of this agenda item is for Council to consider whether to order a feasibility report at this time. Attached is Resolution No. 5415 for Council consideration and for ordering the preparation of a feasibility report. With the proposed Valley Green Corporate Center site, in order for this site to be developed, transportation improvements are needed for CSAH 83 and CSAH 16. With the recently completed AUAR document in the mitigation plan under Goal 7, the Valley Green Corporate Center site is to limit the impact of traffic generated by activities within the project area. Since the Valley Green Corporate Center site needs CSAH 83 and 16 improvements and there are limitations on the amount of traffic, Scott County believes that the next step in addressing many issues would be for a feasibility study. Attached to this memo is a letter from Brad Larson, Scott County Highway Engineer, outlining the issues that needs to be included in the feasibility study to address many of the issues that still remain in making the improvements to CSAH 83 and CSAH 16. The issues are as follows: • Specific transportation related issues raised in the AUAR especially by Mn/DOT • Ultimate realignment of CSAH 16 /17 Avenue • Jurisdictional issues related to CSAH 16 and 17 Avenue • Cost determination and cost participation agreements • Timing of infrastructure improvements to CSAH 83, CSAH 16 and 17 Avenue • Right -of -Way acquisition issues Included in these specific issues would also be determining the project costs and lane configurations for both CSAH 83 and 16 improvements. In the issue of ultimate alignment for CSAH 16 /17 Avenue, the alignment for CSAH 16 would be analyzed from C.R. 83 to McKenna Road. This alignment analysis is being done to determine what the final alignment would be for C.R. 16 in this area. The improvement study area for CSAH 83 is from 12 Avenue to % mile south of existing CSAH 16 intersection. This would include looking at a potential signal at 12 tt, Avenue and C.R. 83, as well as the closing of Secretariat Drive from a full movement intersection to a right- in/right -out only intersection. The improvement for CSAH 16 includes the realignment of existing CSAH 16 west of CSAH 83 and east of CSAH 83 in order to accommodate two access points into the Valley Green Corporate Center site, as well as realigning C.R. 16 with future 17 Avenue. The realignment of CSAH 16 with 17 Avenue was identified in the City's Transportation Plan. It has received prior approval from Scott County as an acceptable transportation route. In fact, one of the requirements from Scott County in the realignment of CSAH 16 is for 17 Avenue to be turned over to the County as a County road. With the feasibility report, the jurisdictional issues related to realigning CSAH 16 to 17 Avenue will be outlined in the report for Council consideration. Previously, the City did a County road improvement on CSAH 17 in which the City and County participated along with assessments in order to fund the improvement. The feasibility report will investigate funding options and procedures for the funding of this prof ect. Attached to this memorandum is a letter from Valley Green Business Park stating that they will fund the cost of the feasibility report in the event the project does not move forward. Also attached to this memo is an extension agreement from WSB & Associates, Inc. in an amount not -to- exceed $52,500.00 to prepare the feasibility report for CSAH 83 and CSAH 16 improvements. WSB & Associates have done the City's Transportation Plan and extensive transportation analysis and design of these facilities on a preliminary basis, thus they would be the best firm to be utilized for the County road improvements. These projects have a preliminary cost estimate of $4,000,000, thus the feasibility report preparation cost is approximately 1.3% of the project cost. This feasibility report will provide more accurate cost estimates for the improvement project and will outline the issues as necessary for the County and City staff, City Council and County Board to consider for possible future agreements in the funding and jurisdictional changes that may occur with this project. 1. Move to approve Resolution No. 5415, a resolution ordering the preparation of a feasibility report for CSAH 83, from 12 Avenue to %2 mile south of existing CSAH 16 intersection; and for CSAH 16, from 1400 feet west of CSAH 83 to 2200 feet east CSAH 83. 2. Do not approve Resolution No. 5415. 3. Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute an extension agreement with WSB & Associates, Inc. to provide consultant services on the preparation of a feasibility report for CSAH 83 and CSAH 16 improvements. 4. Table for additional information. Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 and No. 3, to order the preparation of a feasibility report as this is necessary to resolve the remaining issues associated with the transportation improvements in this area, and to provide a better cost for the City, County and property owners involved in these projects. 1. Offer Resolution No. 5415, A Resolution Ordering the Preparation of a Report for County State Aid Highway 83, from 12 Avenue to V2 Mile South of the Existing County State Aid Highway 16 Intersection; and County State Aid Highway 16, from 1400 Feet West of County State Aid Highway 83 to 2200 Feet East of County State Aid Highway 83 and move its adoption. 2. Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute an extension agreement with WSB & Associates, Inc. to provide consultant services on the preparation of a feasibility report on CSAH 83 & CSAH 16 improvements. P UUL ce Loney Public Works Director BL /pmp MEM5415 WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 83, from 12` Avenue to % mile south of existing CSAH 16 intersection; and CSAH 16 from 1400 feet west of CSAH 83 to 2200 feet east of CSAH 83 by sanitary sewer, waterain, storm sewer, street reconstruction, turn lanes, concrete median, concrete curb & gutter, traffic control signals, concrete sidewalk, bituminous trail and any appurtenant work and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the proposed improvement be referred to Bruce Loney, Public Works Director, for study and that he is instructed to report to the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made a proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvements as recommended. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of 1 2000. ATTEST: Mayor of the City of Shakopee City Clerk M1 BRADLEY J. LARSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/ COUNTY HIGHWAY ENGINEER September 8, 2000 Bruce Loney, P.E. Shakopee Public Works Director 129 Holmes Street S Shakopee, MN 55379 -1351 Subject: CSAII 83/16 Improvements Valley Green Corporate Center - AUAR Dear Bruce: Fax: (952) 496 -8365 A" F� S We have reviewed the final AUAR for the Valley Green Corporate Center including the Mitigation Plan and Goals. With the City of Shakopee's approval of this AUAR, we recommend that discussion begin with the City and property owner(s) to address the issues raised through this process. We believe that the development could proceed from a transportation perspective given the proposed improvements contained in the AUAR, previous traffic studies of CSAH's 83 and 16 and 17 Avenue and resolution of the following: • Specific transportation — related issues raised in the AUAR especially by Mn /DOT • Ultimate alignment of CSAH 16/17' Avenue • Jurisdictional issues related to existing CSAH 16 and 17' Avenue • Cost determination and cost participation agreements • Timing of infrastructure improvements to CSAH 83, CSAH 16, and 17' Avenue • Right -of -Way acquisition issues As you suggested, the next step in addressing these issues and others would be through a feasibility study initiated by the property owner /developer. Scott County Highway Department would be supportive of that approach. Please call us if you need additional information. Si cerely, Bradley J. Larson, P.E. Public Works Director /County Highway Engineer BJL /mmk E -mail: Art Bannerman, Dave Unmacht, Brian Sorenson C: Jon Albinson mk- w: \word\letter\nunk \brad\loney - csah 83 -16 improvements.doc An Equal Opportunity /Safety Aware Employer September 13, 2000 b:►I� � 1. Bruce Loney City of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Feasibility Study County Road 83 / 16 Reconstruction Dear Bruce: We understand there will be an item on the City Council September 19 agenda that requests Council to authorize feasibility study for the County Road 83/16 Reconstruction Project. There are a number of benefited property owners bordering this project, with Valley Green Business Park being the largest of those so benefited. The Council will probably be concerned with any possible financial loss to the General Fund for the cost of the feasibility study in the event the project does not move forward. With that in mind, Valley Green Business Park would be willing to cover the cost of the feasibility study should the project not move forward. In the event the project is constructed, we understand that the cost of the feasibility study will then be added to the project cost and assessed accordingly to all the benefited properties bordering the project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Respectfully, Ion R. Albinson Project Director CC' Brian Brennan — Allianz of Amgrica et�u ^y - rty -- R,sa� e�sn r i 5 PaLt to B .cam � UuB� a for f�as� ,. .. .. �, ,., .... September 19, 2000 LASE & ASSOCIATES INC. 8441 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 350 Minneapolis, MN 55426 tel: 763 - 541 -4800 fax: 763 - 541 -1700 Mr. Bruce Loney, P.E. Public Works Director /City Engineer City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 -1376 Re: Estimate of Cost to Provide Engineering Services CSAH 83 / CSAH 16 Reconstruction Feasibility Report WSB Proposal No. 080 -000 Dear Mr. Loney: 7635411700 P.02iO4 B.A. Mitlelsteadt, P.E. Bret A. Wcisr,, P.E. Parer R. Willenbring. P.E. Donald W. Sams. P.E. Ronald B. Bray, P.E. According to our Agreement for Professional Services with the City of Shakopee and Section I -C -2 (Major Projects), this extension agreement is written to provide you with an estimate of cost for engineering services for the above - referenced project. We are proposing to complete the work, as detailed on the attached scope of services (Exhibit A). The attached work plan describes the approach and tasks proposed to be completed by WSB. It should be noted that the work plan includes soil borings, design surveying and feasibility report- Payment of services would be completed based on the following schedule: The costs for all services will be on a cost - reimbursable basis with a not -to- exceed cost. It is proposed that all work under the contract would be considered complete after the public hearing and acceptance of the feasibility report by City Council. Minneapolis m St. C l o u d Infrastructure Engineers Planners p,•L,$" - h vpwdWA0P?SAk1080 -W109 /900 -bf xyd EQUAL OPPORTUNTIY EMPLOYER SEP -14 -2000 13 =55 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. Mr. Bruce Loney, P.E. Public Works Director /City Engineer City of Shakopee September 19, 2000 Page 2 7635411700 P.03iO4 We are available to begin the work plan as soon as authorized by the City, and we anticipate to complete the project according to the following schedule, assuming that we receive the notice to proceed on September 19, 2000. We would propose to complete the project according to a tentative schedule noted as follows: Order Feasibility Report ............. ............................... September 19, 2000 Accept Feasibility Report and Order Public Hearing ........................ November 7, 2000 I nformational Meeting ............... ............................... November 22, 2000 Public Hearing, Project Approval and Order Plans .......................... December b, 2000 This schedule assumes that no unforseen issues arise and the coordination and review by Scott County and Mn/DOT occurs with no delays. The City of Shakopee agrees to reimburse WSB & Associates for these services in accordance with Section IV of the Agreement for Professional Services. If this agreement meets with your approval, please sign below and return one copy to our office. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Bret A. Weiss, P.E. President c: Charles T. Rickart, WSB & Associates City Administrator City Cleric Mayor Date PcL "- PrapwaMROFOULW80 -001091900 -bGwpd SEP -14 -2000 13:55 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 7635411700 P.04/04 I o n ill 1 Feasibility Re City C � '• r rc of r a r 1 WSB Proposal r 080-000 W • Project Management This task includes planning and coordination of all work tasks, establishment and monitoring of budgets, and correspondence with the City of Shakopee on a periodic basis. The project manager will provide technical direction on all aspects ofthe project, review all work products, and prepare monthly progress reports. The project manager will serve a primary role in the many design considerations. • Data Collection Available data will be collected from the City, Scott County, Mn/DOT, private utility companies, and adjacent developers as necessary, to prepare the feasibility report. ® Surveys/Base Mapping Base mapping will be developed, using information available from the Scott County /City of Shakopee and the developers adjacent to the roadway. This information will be supplemented with field surveys for topographic features, elevation control, and specific utility location. Horizontal control will be tied into the Scott County Coordinate System. Vertical control will be tied into existing elevations established by the City of Shakopee /Scott County in the project vicinity. Field surveying will be completed to acquire additional critical design information not available on the topographic mapping and cross - sections on 50 -foot intervals throughout the areas anticipated to be disturbed and graded. ® Soils Report Soils information will be collected using a subconsultant and data from adjacent developers. Report Preparation This task will include preparation of the feasibility report including cost estimates and assessment roll. In addition, the feasibility report will address several issues, including: • Specific transportation- related issues raised in the AUAR (especially by Mn/DOT); ® Ultimate alignment of CSAH 16 and 17 Avenue; • Jurisdictional issues related to the existing CSAH 16 and 17 Avenue; ® Cost participation; Timing of the improvements for CSAH 83, CSAH 16 and 17 Avenue; • Might -of -way acquisition issues Also, as part of the feasibility report, an alternative alignment for CSAH 16 east of CSAH 83 will be developed which would provide fora potential frontage road for the residents along existing CSAH 16. Agency Coordination WSB will work with the city of Shakopee, Scott County and Mn/Dot to address issues identified in the AUAR and feasibility report. It is estimated that up to 4 meeting will be required to accomplish this task. Public Bearing / Informational Meeting WSB will attend the public hearing/informational meeting to address any concerns and answer any questions on the feasibility report. P-WA -Pmp APX0P0VLW6D -00 A -A.kPd TOTAL P.04 0 V J l ^ � J T 0 I_ � V V J n 0 M 0 I � VI 0 n � Y o y I . r- _d -O Ej pz z 31 CIO z o � z � ' 15 M a df - -- From e stbo und c ' int I: 2�1i Avenue I'D ,I I P h <+ ro I'D n 3 L CD - � r0J p i I 8 1 � II �\ �^/I V T > / y f 0 �a lei -1 1 -n in 5 C-10 Z C D M Z C '. M � � d X p Z D Z d TI t C 14 O D C Z p CD o � i I _ _'_ _ --- - - - -- -- -� - -- Avenue Future i ll' <� 'In ��- t0 0 '' � I`` P, -F FO mD o � CO ' �� 9 I £ � Per -7 z rr7 M 1 X D UZ E� MM M Z p M CJ C z r- _d -O Ej pz z 31 CIO z o � z � ' 15 M a df - -- From e stbo und c ' int I: 2�1i Avenue I'D ,I I P h <+ ro I'D n 3 L CD - � r0J p i I 8 1 � II �\ �^/I V T > / y f 0 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Police Department MPmnrnndu.m TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Dan Hughes, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Surplus Property DATE: September 14, 2000 .� �e Council is asked to declare certain items held by the Police Department as surplus property, under City Code 2.70 S3A, and disposed of or sold as junk. :• ' 1 This is a follow -up to the Police Department's memo to council dated August 31, 2000. The Police Department has identified additional surplus property, old evidence and found property. See attached list of property from CSO Erin Lundy. The registered owners of the property are unknown or do not wish to reclaim their property. Staff recommends Council declare these items held by the Police Department as surplus property for the purpose of proper disposal. If the Council concurs, it should, by motion, declare these items surplus property and authorize staff to appropriately dispose of these items. DH:pm Attachment (1) City of •• Memorandum I To: Mark McNeil, City Administrator From: Erin Lundy, CSO Date: September 15th, 2000 Re: Surplus Property /Disposal The Shakopee Police Department is currently storing old evidence and found property in the evidence room and garage loft. All items have been stored at the police department for more than a year, and the registered owners of the property are unknown or do not wish to reclaim their property. It is very likely that some of these items will sell in auction. I am requesting that the items listed below be declared surplus property, under City Code 2.70 s3A, and disposed of or sold as junk. ® JobBoss Tool Belt Maroon ® Minolta X -370 Camera w/blue case ® Black backpack • Green backpack • 5 various sized /colored tool boxes (metal) containing numerous tools ® Marlboro Adventure Team bag (red) ® Blue Coleman lunch cooler ® 2 wood baseball bats ® Sharp EX -1200 cash register ® Panasonic typewriter 0 Postage scale TO: Mayor & City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Tom Pitschneider, Fire Inspector SUBJECT: Permitting of High School Bonfire ATE: September 15, 2000 For several years the Shakopee High School has been doing a bonfire in conjunction with the Shakopee Football Homecoming celebration. a «IJT.ZI�i1►�11 Various community groups and citizens have helped to sponsor an annual bonfire on the Thursday night prior to the Shakopee football homecoming game. This bonfire has previously been held on city property southwest of the High School and public works has been responsible for clean up of trash and mitigation of the site. Due to the intense heat concentrated on the area soil replacement and reseeding are often necessary. In previous years a burning permit was required for this fire, however, with the passage of Ordinance 562 regulating open fires in November of 1999 a fire of this size is longer allowed. Ordinance 562 provides for recreational fires for ceremonial purposes but limits the total fuel area to three (3) feet or less in diameter and three (3) feet or less in height. This fire will be substantially larger than allowed. I believe when this ordinance was written that events such as this were overlooked and should have been included in the ordinance. I have spoken to Mr. Tun Murphy at the Shakopee High School. In our discussion I noted that a permit could be issued with City Council approval of an ordinance amendment, however, there would be restrictions added to provide for a safe event and provide responsibility for the clean up of trash and site mitigation due to the fact this fire will be occurring on City property. Council is being asked to approve the issuance of a burning permit for the homecoming bonfire on October 5, 2000 and to direct staff to prepare an amendment to Ordinance 562 approving such fires. This amended ordinance will be brought before Council on October 3, 2000 and published on October 5, 2000. 1 1 1 1. Approve the issuance of a burning permit for the Shakopee High School Football Homecoming Bonfire to be held on October 5, 2000. This permit will contain the following restrictions: a. The size of the burning pile shall be approved by the Shakopee Fire Inspector. b. No material shall be place at the site of the fire prior to the morning of October 5, 2000. c. No material other than full or damaged pallets may be burned. d. Fire Department Personnel and apparatus shall be at the scene during the fire. e. Shakopee Public Schools shall be responsible for the removal of all trash from the area after the event. f. Responsibility for costs associated with site mitigation shall be determined before the permit is issued. 2. Direct staff to prepare an ordinance allowing recreational fires with a total fuel area of greater than three (3) feet in diameter and/or greater than three (3) feet in height to be permitted upon the issuance of a special permit. C To: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator From: Mark McQuillan, Natural Resource Director Subject: Southbridge Parks Master Plan and Specifications for Soccer Fields Date: August 29, 2000 INTRODUCTION At a recent budget workshop, Council directed staff to develop a Parks Master Plan for the Southbridge area and entire park system. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) discussed this action at their August 28 meeting and concurred with Council's decision. However, the PRAB felt the Master Plan should be limited to the Southbridge area and not the entire city park system. BACKGROUND In 1997, the City Council adopted an entirely new park dedication ordinance that subsequently led to the development of a Parks Comprehensive Park Plan. The study created a long -range park plan to serve a population of 35,000 people. The major findings and recommendations of the plan basically stated: The existing park system (north of by -pass) has adequate park acreage and distribution. • Based on the Draft Land Use Plan, the population of Shakopee will ultimately grow to about 35,000 people or 21,00 — 22,000 new residents. • The majority of that growth will occur in the St. Francis area (12,300 people) and Dean Lake (7,400 people). • Approximately 310 acres of new developed parkland is needed to adequately serve the new population growth and commercial and industrial needs. • Thirty -seven (37) miles of new pedestrian/bike trail are needed. • Approximately 20 new neighborhood parks, 2 community parks and 2 community- school playfields and needed. The DRAB would prefer incorporating the existing Comprehensive Park Plan with the Parks Planning Guide developed by the Natural Resource Director. The guide is included with your packet. This would save the City money and also accomplish Council's objectives. PARK MASTER PLAN The Southbridge development is unique to Shakopee because of it location, design and natural environment. The lake, woodlands and wildlife are sensitive to the area and require careful planning. A master plan will create appropriate recreation uses for the area without damaging environmentally sensitive assets. The PRAB is recommending a master plan for the Southbridge area. DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOCCER FIELDS In addition to the Master Plan, staff would like to request that plans and specifications be prepared for the proposed soccer fields by Sun Path School. Staff anticipates all of the land for the soccer fields will be acquired by the end of next year (2001), if not sooner. Youth soccer in Shakopee is a rapidly growing program and we could use the additional fields by year 2003. Construction of fields would commence in year 2002. In order to meet those objectives, staff is recommending we proceed with the plans and specifications so we know how much dirt should be left on site. The developer for the Pheasant Run 6 th Addition has agreed to remove the excess dirt from the 10 acres for grade elevation in their development. ALTERNATIVES 1. Direct staff to prepare Request For Proposals for a Master Plan for Southbridge Parks and design specifications for soccer fields near Sun Path School. 2. Direct staff to prepare Request For Proposals for a Master Plan for Southbridge Parks. 3. Table for additional information from staff. 4. Do nothing. RECOMMENDATION The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommend Alternative #1 ACTION REQUESTED Direct staff to prepare and disseminate Request For Proposals for a Master Plan for Southbridge parks and prepare design specifications for soccer fields near Sun Path School. s Mark J. McQuill Director of Natural Resources N M I . ] "f' / 1 f 3 -22 Park Names, Facilities, Activities and Location of Each Park Page 3 Holmes Park 4 Hiawatha park 5 Stans Park 6 Meadows Park 7 Prairie Bend Park 8 Scenic Heights park 9 Timber Trail Park 10 Kilamey Park 11 Emerald Lane Park 12 P & V Addition Park 13 Riverview Park 14 George Muenchow Park 15 Tahpah Park 16 Lions Park 17 Huber Park 18 Veterans Memorial Park 19 O'Dowd Lake Park 20 Eaglewood Park 21 Deerview Acres Park 22 Future Parks 23 -29 Proposed Projects for Each Park Starting 2000 30 -58 1997 Comprehensive Park Plan 59 -60 Table of Facilities /Activities at Each Park 61 2001 Parks CIP — Not Complete 62 -64 Park Ordinances Ordinance 65 -75 Tree Preservation Ordinance - Draft City Park and Trail Maps — Not Complete HOLMES PARK (4 AVE. & SHUMWAY) 2 ACRES Holmes Park underwent redevelopment in 1999 after a 1997 storm wiped out all of its mature trees. Over two dozen new trees were transplanted which included an entirely new landscape plan. Trails were added with and access points from each corner of the park. Berms and shrubbery were added to give the park some topography and the old pavement under the shelter was ripped out and replaced. New playground equipment is also planned. The park has a half court basketball area and horseshoe pits. • Activities include group picnics, playground events, informal play and ice - skating in the winter. • Acquired by purchase. w. wl _ I 'Ii � � h X11 w. IIISH�ll K❑ LD n LLJ HIAWATHA (JOHN P. ER ERS IRC E ) P (7 & MARKET) 1.5 ACS Hiawatha Park is a small neighborhood park that is also under redevelopment. A new 1430 square foot shelter building is under construction. The building will be use during the winter as a warming house and during the summers for summer play activities and neighborhood meetings. The shelter will also accommodate small groups picnics. The existing playground equipment needs some updating and full court basketball surface gets plenty of use. Horseshoe pits are in the works. • Activities include winter ice skating, outdoor basketball, family picnicking, and playground activities. • Acquired through land dedication. rjth ; AVM AV � - C7 r te _--, � �11 III ail �,� �; z; �,► �, y" �j AVE j AV 10th E. � U 4 STANS PARK (1 TH & PULLER ST) 1.3 ACRES Stans Park is under reconstruction. This small park, named after Maurice Stans, is adjacent to the Sr. High School tennis courts. The existing tennis courts are being reconstructed and relocated fifty feet to the south of its existing location so it lines up even with HS courts. The old warming house was removed and the playground equipment will be rearranged. The primary activity in this park is tennis. The new open space on the north end of the park will include benches flower beds and small walkway. • Activities include organized tennis leagues and tournaments and children on playground equipment. • Acquired through land dedication. loth Li ci U 3 ~ O w CJ_) Q I Q NI CENTER Lj OnI s' U' T -�N ?AS Hvr N 'r= NNE S MEUKE w '� C I R. 2:- MENKE 3 AVE. � 2 MEADOWS PARK (SAGE LANE & LILAC COURT) 3 ACRES Meadows Park is a small neighborhood park with playground equipment, a half court for basketball and trail that connects Sage Lane and Primrose Lane. This is a popular park for families with young children who enjoy using the play equipment. Older kids use the half court basketball hoop. • Activities include informal play on play equipment, basketball, and open area for throwing a ball around. • Acquired through land dedication. o W > �J M-INT d � AR,KSPUR� `S T, LANE �z p. SAGE LAC CT. EE i l �I . ; � ! V1ERL T - _ M A D 0 WS 0 PRAIRIE BEND PARK (PARKWAY AVE. AND E S Y "E.) 5 ACRES Prairie Bend Park is a perfect blending of passive and active components in a park. A well laid out trail system enables park users to access all facilities and open spaces. Facilities are spread out on the five acres rather than cluster into one area of the park. The large playground area serves as the centerpiece for the park. The park also has a half court for basketball, horseshoes, sand volleyball area, backstop, and benches strategically placed along the trail system. This park is a model for future neighborhood parks. Activities include areas for playing informal basketball, baseball /softball, sand volleyball, horseshoes and bike riding, walking and running. Acquired through land dedication. A17 LJ PRAIRE BEND w N L-i 'L �� � U J REEN AY AVE. n C7 41� �a A1RK 1 - R I NE`�OED DR T Z z p - r M7 - _:v .! �� ��(ERIDIAN�'� S " E D- 1 4 1 1 H. �I�Q J1J. SCENIC HEIGHTS PARK (RUBY LANE CLESAC) 10 ACRES A large drainage ditch traverses through much of Scenic Heights Park. The ditch serves carries storm water to the river but also encompasses a City recreational trail that covers up to eight miles. On the south section of the park is a shelter building, hockey rink, pleasure skating rink, horseshoe pits, a full -size basketball court, sand volleyball area and playground equipment. • Activities include informal hockey, pleasure skating, horseshoes, basketball, sand volleyball and bike riding through park (drainageway trail). • Acquired through land dedication. 7°- r' I ^V` r W TR. L ® T P_- RA S CE_'VI C HEIGHTS PARK n. \\ HA L R'S PARK V) TR. L ® T P_- RA S CE_'VI C HEIGHTS PARK n. \\ HA L R'S PARK 22nd AVE. TIMBER TRAILS PARk ABBEY POINT m z I N% DRIVE STA �30KE -AVE nr I 12th AVE r)l SECRETARIAT DR, o 10 EMERALD LANE PARK (EMERALD LN & DIAMOND CT) .5 ACRE (Tot -Lot) Playground tot lot for children ages 6 -9. This mini park is the size of a residential lot and cannot be expanded. Has a jungle -gym unit with slides, swings and riders. • Activities include young children using play equipment. • Acquired through land dedication. w r J J AVE Y r � Iff a — i UJ VitRL!!NO 16 , FM A -q DR. J MI;RPHY 11LVE JR• w n CL C4 CR �F� S T,p ■ L]N Y) wI R. TOT -LOT PARS 11 P & V ADDITION PARK (MOUND STREET AND SPENCER) I ACRE Nothing more than an oversized lot that is undeveloped. It has a couple of mature Weeping Willow trees on the property that provide plenty of shade. The park has the potential for nice trail rest stop. The County Road 79 Trail borders the property. • Activities none. Undeveloped park. • Acquired through annexation — Jackson Township. W CLX 71 COM. CENT F F— � � a'�KSP III L J-1 7 LANE L i ��� w LANE , � � � ��� ��, ` �� ` � �� W � iiU (�� �% SHE_ :D �TN L 17 \J E U N 7 ED 7 Z� J U N SAND ST ' T. I�OUNID S ,aPPLEBLOS-1- A ADDIT-101 - 12 < C� > RIVER' IE PARK=- 1! 1 <� , - �ll � . 'I _III = == � �II 1 �.I� ,� .� 111 CL 13 GEORGE MUENCHOW FIELDS (10 TH AVE. FULLER STREET) 20 ACRES This park is located next to Shakopee Community Center and the Sr. High School football and track facility. It was dedicated in 1997 and named after George Muenchow the first Director of Parks and Recreation (1957- 1990). There are three fully fenced fields constructed on the "Wheel" concept with room to add two more fields. Trails meander through the park. The fields were designed for youth baseball and softball ages 8-12. Activities include organized youth baseball and softball during the summer and micro soccer during the fall. Acquired by purchase with community center site. I Oth AV I - ! L21 7 M FN I CI C Jiz F'r LL C� L r n; �� � :.� r r_ A E kL —, BLUES 4 V , ii 14 TAHPAH PARK (CR 15 & VIERLI G R.) 50 ACRES The parkland was acquired from the State in the early 1970s. The Shakopee Jaycees adopted the park as project that includes nine softball fields (2 fields lighted), a lighted youth football field, concessions stand, playground, and the Joe Schleper Baseball Stadium. Construction started in 1974 and continues to this day. Other organizations have also contributed to the development of Tahpah Park. They include the Adult Softball Programs, Youth Football Association, Youth Baseball and Softball Associations, Rotary Club, Adult Baseball Teams and the City of Shakopee. Many individuals spent many hours volunteering their services to create one of the finest athletic complexes on the Twin Cities. Plans are in the making to expand the parking lot and to create two new softball fields and one youth baseball field. • Activities include organized adult baseball, softball, youth football, soccer and sometimes touch football when there are enough teams. • Acquired by purchase from State. Ten acres on the west end was acquired through matching grant funds. 151 S! !g AVE! \ - ��r � ✓�� it Q > _''� i� v v'I 10th V) LION S PARK - 1 AVE. ' 00 ! n Z Z ir V III Lill 115th ST _ ZI W. 1 3th GG• D. I D. HH D, Y t ^Y• `CARVES' LN ?TAHPAH PARK 15 This 33.8 -acre park is a classic community park. It has two large picnic shelters to accommodate a 100 people each, horseshoe pits, a quarter acre playground with the newest equipment, a twelve hole disc golf course, four tennis courts, archery range, two hockey rinks, pleasure skating rink, 12 hole disc golf course, warming house, Community Youth Building for scouting groups, acres of open space, 1.5 acre pond, trees, trails and 1 acre sand bottom swimming pool with chlorinated water and is fully staffed. The park is located adjacent to Sweeney Elementary School that has two Little League ball fields and play equipment. Parking is a problem in this park. The existing parking lot and roadway into the park needs to be separated for safety and access. An entrance into the park is needed on the south side of the park. • Activities include outdoor swimming, picnics, horseshoes, tennis, winter ice- skating, summer in -line skating, sand volleyball and disc golf. • Acquired by purchase from State - 1979. \ W. 7th VE�F � III LJ \ > i, _..!_� ✓ Ili_ J r ul i \ '= �' / �, LIONS PAPK W. 11ti -= 30 MENKE 115th LL L I J 1 171 ,: c z < Oil D. D. TAHPAH PARK c HUBER PARK (129 Levee Dr. & Main Street- River) 4.1 acres Huber Park is undergoing a total makeover. The park has a boat landing to launch boats into the Minnesota River, State trail, restrooms and a rodeo arena, which is no longer in use. The new Huber Park Master Plan identifies moving the boat launch from the west end of the park to the east end, parking for 150 cars, outdoor theater, fishing pier, farmers market and other internal paths. • Activities include bike riding, walking and running on the Minnesota Valley Trail and boat launch for fishing. 1 S t UU� �Jrd A� s J 17 VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK (HWY 101 & VIKING STEEL RD) 110 ACRES Memorial Park, a 110 -acre park in the northeastern portion of Shakopee's urban area, lies on the Minnesota River and is accessible from MN Hwy 101. The Millpond Creek flows through the park and provides a special amenity to nature lovers. Picnicking is the major activity within the park, which attracts people from far and near. Facilities include picnic tables, two large picnic shelters, charcoal grills, rest room facilities, large playground area, one half mile of bituminous trails, fishing pier in the millpond and Native American Burial Mounds encompassed with native plants. Historically, Memorial Park was a village for the Dokatah Indians. Rev. Pond, a Christian Missionary, ministered to the Dokotah. He lived by the spring at the western edge of the park (south of Hwy 101). He made his living by operating the Grist Mill located next to the stream between the park and Murphy's landing. • Activities include picnics, outdoor band concerts, roadside rest area, bike riding, walking and running on the trails and children using the play equipment. • Acquired from State dedication. ' ^> �= --_ A NAUar+ �LIEMORIA ARK /MURPHY'S LANDING 17 W! W I =III PRAIRE BEND TARK I 4th AVE N w RE= AY AVE. N PINEWOOD DRI W TIMOTHY CT. w o / 7 4 T 'JAY AVE !� z ~ l l CAR / 2 j MER IDIAN ' J ALYSHE3A CT D % F qG P UAN WN AVE. �1< / i ti H v AVE_ ILA UER' S PARK E O "DO D LAKE PARK (CR 79 & LOONDRY COVE) 15 ACRES O "Dowd Lake Park is located on the northwest shore of O'Dowd Lake in Shakopee, Minnesota. This gorgeous property of mostly wooded terrain was acquired in small parcels from 1977 to 1980. The park is 15 acres in size of which 8 acres is peninsula. The peninsula is well situated for parking vehicles, family picnics, fishing, or launching a canoe or paddle craft. A shallow bay separates the north part of the park. However, a recreational trail connects the neighborhood to the north onto the peninsula. A tunnel under the road (CR79) connects the trail on the east side of the roadway to the west. In 1986, the United States Department of Interior transferred ownership of five small islands, which are in close proximity of the park, to the City of Shakopee. In essence, the islands are considered part of O'Dowd Lake Park. The five islands total about 6.4 acres and will be left in their natural state. The currently has a trail, observation area on the point of the peninsula, 84 foot T fishing pier, gravel road and parking. Plans also include the installation of two family size picnic shelters. Activities include fishing of the dock or shoreline and bike riding, walking and running on the trail. Acquired through purchase and State grants. 130th ST, W 22nd AVE. Tf- TRAILS P_ARk 91ABBE" DOINT � RHAV \l R I VE z - � 1 � i Q QpD DUCK TR. r 79 HE r ST CV�g��� KE DR. / r LON Dp /` ' 0'D 0 WD LAKE PARK <_ • 6169 This park is mostly wetland and boggy. Little, if any, room for development. • Activities none. • Acquired through land dedication. I 'RES PARK MULBERRY CIR. I II OR. II SYCAMORE T �J C r�J 1 , EAICLEfY00D PARK Of S ZN ,.a`•0��. 17 DEERVIEW ACRES P (NORTON DRIVE) 6 ACRES This park located next to a marshland and has very little access other than a 20 ft strip of easement. • Activities none. • Acquired through land dedication. P' ACRES PARK A-CLEWOOD PARK i r, _1 �- a N �1 H—d n, �J 21 MULBERRY ^�a I NCRTCN DR- i SYCAMCRE CIR. \\ 17 AVE. A-CLEWOOD PARK i r, _1 �- a N �1 H—d n, �J 21 a � • �; a .. �.. a � a 77 Definition: Sometimes referred to as "vest pocket parks" because they are generally half acre in size converted for specialized recreational use. Tot lots, mini arboretums are a few examples. Rice and Mears parks in downtown St. Paul are classic examples of mini parks. Emerald Lane Park in the auer's Addition in a local example. Minimum facilities: • Playground equipment in a designated area for tiny tots. • Open Space area for active playground ball related games. • Landscaping that includes trees, shrubbery, flowers and possibly a water fountain. Park Current Status FPro2osed ro"ects Costs Emerald Land Tot Meets None $0 Lot Requirements 10` & Spencer Undeveloped Trees, landscaping , trail $40,000 and benches 23 Definition: Neighborhood parks are designed primarily to serve children six to fourteen years of age. However, the trend to developing neighborhood parks is changing. Neighborhood parks were typically in the range of 2 to 5 acres. The standard today for developing communities recommend that neighborhood parks range from 5 to 10 acres_ The larger neighborhood park lends itself to more types of activities, passive and active. Minimum facilities: • Tennis courts, ball fields, hard court surface for basketball and shuffleboard • Winter ice - skating and warming house. • Playground equipment and skater parks. • Trails and landscaping. Park Current Status Proposed projects Costs Holmes Park Under Additional play $40,000 redevelopment equipment, Hiawatha Under New warming house, $78,000 Park/John P. redevelopment Additional play Wermerskirchen equipment $25,000 Park Stans Park Under New tennis courts and $250,000 redevelopment shelter Timber Trails Fully Developed None $0 Park Meadows Park Fully Developed None $0 Killarney Hills Non - developed Tennis court, playground $100,000 Park equipment and backstop. Scenic Heights Fully Developed Additional play $25,000 Park equipment 24 Prairie Send Park Fully Developed None $0 Southbridge East Park Undeveloped Needs Master Plan $ Southbridge West Park Undeveloped Needs Master Plan $ Eaglewood Park Undeveloped Open Space preserve. $0 Deerview Acres Undeveloped Open Space preserve $0 25 Community playfields can range anywhere from 30 to 60 acres. These parks have facilities for a variety of recreational activities for youth and adults. Athletic facilities generally dominate. Minimum facilities: • Large playing surfaces for sports like slow and fast -pitch softball, baseball, tennis, soccer and football. • Archery facilities, hockey rink, stadiums, trails, restrooms, concessions and large parking. Park Current Status Pro osed Ero ects Costs Riverview Ball Not fully Parking, bleachers. $30,000 field Park developed Tahpah Park Expanded park Expand parking, add $150,000 area. roadway from Vierling Drive, develop 3 ball $50,000 fields and add lights to field #4 Peasant Run Undeveloped Six soccer fields, parking $1,400,000 Soccer Complex lot, play equipment, trails next to Sun Path and restroom. (Includes School acquisition costs) Muenchow Fields Newly developed Irrigation for ball fields $25,000 and add a 4th field w/o fencing. $8,000 26 Definition: Community Parks are usually the largest of City Parks and they may range from 100 to 1,000 acres in size. In smaller communities, community parks will range from 30 to 100 acres. These parks may consist of woodlands, varying topography, ponds, marshes and lakes, picnic areas, athletic fields, trails, and special facilities like pools, marinas or golf courses. Minimum facilities: ® Facilities of all interest Park Current Status Proposed projects Costs Lions Park Under New shelters for $150,000 development southern end of park, trail bridge over drainage ditch, benches re -do some trails. Parking lot by pool $250,000 Memorial Park Fully developed None. $0 O'Dowd Lake Under Family picnic shelter and $10,000 Park development asphalt road and parking lot. $50,000 Huber Park Under Outdoor theater, new $700,000 redevelopment boat landing, parking for 150 cars, stabilization of riverbank and fishing pier. Southbridge Undeveloped Needs Master Plan $15,000 (MnDot) Park Development costs: $275,000 roadway, trails, play equipment, parking for 100 cars, restrooms and large picnic shelter. 27 Rju ® Special purpose facilities and resources provide a single or specific form of recreation. For example, community centers with an indoor leisure pool, fitness facility, ice rink, theater, etc. or nature center or history center. Park Current Status Proposed projects Costs Community Future Leisure pool, fitness $8 million Center consideration facilities, theater and 2nd sheet of ice.. Murphy's Under restoration Independently operated. $0 Landing Nature Center Future Building with $800,000 consideration classrooms, exhibits and programs — locate near diverse environment 28 C�' •fit �� • `! R' �s • School grounds are used for a variety of activities, particularly for school age children and they generally consist of playing fields for youth baseball, football, soccer and softball. Older school grounds had less open space with blacktop surfaces. Today, State guidelines recommend that elementary schools have a minimum of 15 acres, middle schools 30 acres and senior high schools 60 acres. Minimum outdoor requirements: • Ball fields with backstops, hard court surface for basketball and/or tennis • Elementary schools construct playground units with swings and jungle gyms. • Stadium for high school activities (track, football and soccer). • Parking lot. School Current Status Proposed p ects Costs Senior High Meets minimum 40 car parking lot and $75,000 requirements trail Junior High Meets minimum . None $0 requirements Sweeney School Meets minimum New playground $0 requirements equipment Pearson School Meets minimum Nature area $0 requirements Sun Path School ( Meets minimum requirements Central Community and Administration Meets minimum requirements Southbridge School Future site of school $0 $0 $0 29 City of ' ' s •; ' . Parks, Recreation, Trails and Open Space Why Should the City Plan for Parks and Recreation? Parks, open spaces, and trails are essential components to a community with a high quality of life. Parks and schools are consistently rated as the most important elements influencing choice of housing location. In promoting a quality environment, providing adequate recreational land area will become increasingly important as Shakopee develops beyond its urban core area. Costs for land south of Highway 169 are increasing rapidly as development interest increases. The challenge to provide the appropriate recreational facilities will also become more difficult with a greater number of people having diverse interests. The Parks, Open Space and Trails Plan is intended to guide the future development of recreational facilities in the City of Shakopee. One of the first steps in formulating a park and recreation system plan is to prepare an inventory of existing regional and local recreational systems in the City_ Building an understanding as to how these facilities were funded and constructed is also beneficial. Volume 1 addresses these two topics and provides some concluding remarks which will provide insights towards the preparation of the Goals, Objectives and Policies developed in Volume 2 and the Park, Recreation and Trail Physical Plan in Volume 3. Regional Parks, Open Space and Trails Plan Since the City of Shakopee is part of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, it is important to illustrate how the City fits into the regional parks and recreation system. Figure P -1 represents the Metropolitan Council's approved Regional Recreation Open Space System Plan which was approved in June, 1991. {Updated in 1998 — Obtain new version ?) Although the City of Shakopee does not have any regional parks or regional park reserves within its corporate limits, there is an extensive open space system along its north boundary or the Minnesota River. This open space system, owned and maintained by the As shown on Figure P -1, a regional trail is proposed on the Metropolitan Council's plan to connect the Minnesota River Valley with three regional parks located in Prior Lake, Savage and Credit River Township. A joint effort by the Cities of Shakopee and Prior Lake, the Mdewakanton Sioux Community, the Hennepin County Parks Board and Scott County is well underway to design and construct this regional trail. This regional trail is a high priority project by the agencies involved as demonstrated by the significant coordination effort required in the grant application process. Support from the Metropolitan Council on the construction of this regional trail is being pursued. This regional trail will also be an essential component to the City's recreation system. With regards to the impacts on the regional parks system, no regional parks will be used as a part of the City's park system since no regional parks exist or have been proposed within the City of Shakopee. The City is working to integrate the Minnesota Valley Trail and the Scott- Hennepin Regional Trail into the overall trail system. Existing and proposed land uses adjacent to the Minnesota River Valley open space area in the Land Use Plan element found in Volume 3. Shakopee Park System inventory The existing parks system in Shakopee is largely the result of cooperative efforts made by a variety of public, private and non -profit entities. In virtually all of the existing park and recreation facilities in the City, two or more agencies or organizations have funded, acquired, designed, constructed, or provided labor and materials. The location of existing parks in the City is shown on Figure P -Z. The City and Independent School District 720 (ISD 730) have promoted a joint neighborhood school and parks recreational activities program which involves extensive sharing of facilities, equipment and staff time. City parks and school playgrounds have generally been located on adjacent sites in the City to maximize this sharing, cooperative effort. Active involvement by local civic groups is another example of the cooperative community spirit in Shakopee. The Shakopee Jaycees, the Lions Club, Rotary Club, VFW and American Legion are groups which have consistently made contributions to the park system facilities over the years. M strategic A third group ac tively contributing to the parks system are the developers of su Eith p dedications or cash payments in lieu of land are a part of th su bdi v ision platting process. As new subdivision pLats in the City are approved, park sites can be dedicated, or park fees can be paid to the City for park and recreational purposes. In 1998, there were approximately 366 acres of City parkland in Shakopee and 134 acres of open space. This acreage has been distributed by park classification in Table P -1. ta Ta ble Shakopee Park System Acreage Inventory - 199? CLA SSMCATTON ACREAGE Historical Park Leased to Murphy's Landing .0 0 Mgn Space Deerview Eagiewood Southbridge Mini -Park Emerald Tot Lot P & V Addition Subtotal Neighborhood School Central Elementary Pearson Elementary Sun Path Elementary Sweeney Elementary Junior High School Senior High School Subtotal Neighborhood Park Hiawatha Holmes Horizon Heights Killarney Hills Meadows Pheasant Run Prairie Bend -Riven ie :v Scenic Heights Southbridge Stans Timber Trails Subtotal Community Plavfield George Muenchow Fields . -Lions ``�.Tahgah Subtotal 1 Community Park j Huber Memorial '\___®Dowd Subtotal 6.9 21.6 17.0 45.5 0.5 1.0 L5 1.0 2.0 18.0 2.0 12.0 50.0 85.0 1.5 2.0 12.1 3.4 3.0 10.0 5.1 :.9 11.0 3.0 1.3 1.3 56.6 30.0 33.8 40.0 103.8 4.1 110.0 15.0 119.1 PARKS 366 acres OPEN SPACE 134 acres M Tables P -3 and P-4 illustrate parkland acreages and park reserve fund contributions over the past several years. These tables show land dedications and cash payments made in lieu of land dedication for park system_ The dedications are a requirement of the subdivision process. Figure P -3: Park Dedications Since 1990 (Source: City of Shakopee Planning Dept.) 0 Figure P4 Park Dedication Funding • n 5 � a ' r • / s' a e. MI • •00 $ 60 , 00 0 • 4 .' 10M (Source: City of Shakopee Planning Dept Open Space System Inventory Whereas, most parks tend to provide for more active or organized activities such as baseball, volleyball, ice skating or tennis, open space areas tend to be more passive or natural in setting. As noted earlier in the discussion on the regional parks system, the major open space areas in Shakopee are located along the Minnesota River Valley. These open space areas have been acquired by state and federal agencies. An inventory of the public open space areas has been provided in Table P -1 and illustrated on Figure P- 2. On a local level, open space areas have been created primarily in environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, shorelands and fioodplains. Many of these areas have been created in the approval of planned unit developments for the benefit of the property owners within the specific project. The open space areas are generally not available to the public in terms of access but provide visual and spatial relief in the growing community. Fkl 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Regional Table P-2 p' ii Inventory C lassification Acrea—ae State James J. Wilke Area Minnesota Valley State Park State Refuge Area Trail System Inventory I Trails are the linking segments of a successful parks and recreation system. Trails should be designed to connect parks and open spaces in a community with residential neighborhoods. They should also link neighborhoods with schools, playgrounds and commercial areas in a community. Without these linking facilities, public investments into parks and open space areas tend to have a lower benefit due to the limited safe access by residents, especially children. The existing trails in the City are shown on Figure P -5. Portions of two major trails have been constructed at this time. The Minnesota Valley Trail, as discussed earlier, extends from Memorial Park to Chaska. The second trail is the City's Upper Valley Trail_ This trail has been constructed from CR 16 on the east and extends to CR15 on the west. This trail follows the Upper Valley Drainageway, which serves as the City's primary stormwater conveyance facility in the urban area. The trail receives heavy bike and pedestrian traffic. Minor trails have been constructed in some of the City parks. Table P- 3provides an inventory of the existing trail system. Table -3 Trail System Inventory Classification Distance State Trails Minnesota Valley Trail 4.4 miles Regional Trails 0.0 miles City Trails Upper Valley Trail .5 miles 0 Lions Park Trail 0.5 miles rm JEJ Park Trail ODowd Trail Existing Level of Service 0.3 miles. 0.2 miles 1.0 miles The City of Shakopee covers 28 square miles. Approximately g -acres is located in the metropolitan urban service area WSA). In 1998, most of the 17,000 residents live in the northwestern comer of the City or the urban core area. The area south of I3ighway 169 is growing rapidly with a mix of housing, commercial and institutional uses. ' As shown on Figure P -2, most of the existing City parks have been located within the urban core area. Figure P -2 also illustrates that neighborhood parks are generally well distributed across the urbanized portion of the City (north of 169). There are very few residential areas that are more than one - quarter mile from these park facilities. Residents of the urbanized area can easily walk or ride a bicycle from their home to more than one neighborhood or community park due to the City's park planning efforts in the past. In the rural areas of the City, fewer park facilities have been created due to lower population base and the larger service area. To date, ODowd Park has received some improvements while other rural City parks are undeveloped. The Shakopee Community Center provides a range of indoor recreation opportunities, The 79,000 square foot building, was built in 1996 and contains an indoor ice skating rink, two gymnasiums, running/walking track, locker rooms and multi- purpose/meeting rooms. There has been interest in expansion of the Community Center to add a second ice rink, an indoor swimming pool, and a fitness center. In 1998, Shakopee's existing park system had approximately one acre of neighborhood and community park land for every 50 residents. This includes active park land and accessible open space land, but does not include inaccessible open space lands, wetlands or flood plain lands. The existing active parks have been constructed at varying times over the last 30 years. While most of the parks are in good condition, there are major park features that need replacement or revitalization. For example, play equipment lasts approximately 15 years, some landscaping and park shelters need to be replaced, and new safety and access requirements call for changes in some park features_ Table P -5 lists the facilities which have been provided in the parks and open space areas in the City. The facilities listed in this table indicate a broad range of recreational activities available to the City's residents. In summary, Shakopee's existing park system generally meets existing local recreation needs through neighborhood park sites with a variety of facilities. The strong participation of civic groups, coupled with ISD 720, has enhanced the maximum recreational utilization of the public's inventory of recreational facilities. Some park features in existing parks need to be replaced or updated to meet current safety, access and recreational needs. Continuing the coordinated and cooperative efforts are vital to maximize the limited public funds for recreational facilities in the City. This Comprehensive Plan should be used as a general guide by all parties involved in acquiring the parkland and developing the park facilities. ' As the growth of the City transitions to the south side of the Shakopee Bypass (Highway 169) and the East Dean Lake area (as indicated in the Land Use Element) similar neighborhood and community park planning, acquisition and development efforts as used in the urban core area should be utilized. A park service district concept should guide the future levels of service for park facilities in Shakopee. Volume 3 — the Park, Recreation and Trail System Plan contains recommendations for park and trail acquisition and development. UA Shakopee, Parks, Trafls and Open Space i 1. Maintain a safe, healthy and attractive parks, recreation, trails and open space system that meets the recreation needs of the City. 1.1. Provide for fully developed parks, trails, facilities, and open space in sufficient quantities to meet the needs of Sakopee's growing population. a.. The City shall use the latest park standards developed by the National Recreation and Park Association and the Shakopee Park, Recreation and Trail Master Plan (Volume 3) to judge the adequacy of its park system and guide future actions_ b. The Park, Recreation, and Trail System Master Plan (Figures P -5 and P -b) shall act as a guide for long range land acquisition for parks and trails to serve the City's future needs. Acquisition shall proceed based on the development of residential and commercial- industrial lands, Iand availability. land suitability and availability of funding. C. Where possible, new neighborhood park sites shall be acquired through negotiated purchases in advance of development and in general, the acquisition costs shall be paid with fees received from residential, commercial, and industrial developers. I New community parks sites shall be acquired through negotiated purchases shall be funded through a combination of park development funds, general funds, general obligation bonds and grants as appropriate. e. Continue to enhance and expand the Shakopee Community Center to meet demonstrated community needs. £ The City will promote the continuation and extension of the Minnesota River Valley trail from Downtown Shakopee to Murphy's Landing and eventually to Fort Snelling. The City will promote the completion of h- Scott-Hennepi 1.2. Preserve and enhance the natural resources of the community. a. The City will create, through its zoning powers, a system of open space for the protection of river and creek floodplains as well as wetlands according to its Surface Water Management Plan. b. Recycling, environmentally sound maintenance procedures and other programs intended to protect natural resources shall be promoted. C. A detailed study to define significant natural resource areas throughout the City shall be maintained. d. A planting/reforestation program shall be maintained for all parks where trees and vegetation are lacking and it is feasible to add additional vegetation. 1.3. Review development proposals to ensure neighborhood streets, sidewalks and lot configurations are compatible with the park needs of the eventual residents. a. The City will ensure that access to parks is provided by sidewalks and/or trails. b. Parks should have access from at least one Local or Collector level street and that street frontage should be at least 300 feet in width- c. If parking is anticipated, the preferred access to the parking lot is from a Collector street. d. Pedestrian access corridors at least 16 feet in width should be acquired and constructed on park edges where there is no reasonably close public street access or where additional access and continuity is determined to be beneficial . e. Neighborhood parks should be spaced no more than one mile apart and the intended users should not have to cross major roads. f. Neighborhood parks should be no smaller than five acres, however, ornamental parks and tot -lots in areas of high- density housing may be smaller. g- Decisions to accept or acquire parcels for park purposes should be based h The trail system shall be developed and extended in a manner which minimizes conflicts between pedestrians and motor vehicles and in accordance with the Trail System Plan. 2. Ensure the cost-effectiveness of the park and recreation system while maintaining quality standards. 2.1. Promote recreational dual use of facilities where feasible. a. Parks should be located adjacent to schools if practical and otherwise advisable so as to share facilities and open space. b. Trail and park construction in conjunction with transportation, drainage, and wetland preservation projects, shall be promoted. C. Where possible and feasible joint school -city development and use of indoor recreation facilities shall be promoted. d. Existing mining operations shall be studied for possible recreational reclamation at the end of their useful mining life. e. Mines and other producers of large amounts of relatively clean wastewater shall be studied for possible public /private partnerships to accept their wastewater for recreational/environmental purposes. 99 b. Ongoing relationships with volunteer programs and civic and athletic/youth • _ r.r x•r r. be promoted •, encourage residents and community organizations to assist in park improvements, maintenance, and recreation programs. Ownership and management control of all facilities will be • • by • C. A dialogue and cooperative effort shall be undertaken between all members of the partnership to encourage the optimal usage of limited resources, joint development of facilities, and minimization of unnecessary duplication. d. Volunteerism shall be promoted through the development of various volunteer programs. 2.3 Use a variety of funding sources for acquisition, development and renovation of park and recreation facilities. a. Evaluate park dedication fee amounts and park acquisition/development costs on a regular basis to ensure fair and appropriate fees. b. Seek grant opportunities, bond referendum funding and other funding sources as appropriate to meet system -wide funding needs. C. Annually update the five -year capital improvement program for park, trail and recreation capital projects. 3. Maximize participation in City programs and encourage citizen involvement in the planning process. 3.1. Promote wide dissemination of information about programs and facilities to all citizens of Shakopee. a. The Parks and Recreation Department will advertise programs through the local media in a cost effective manner. b. Brochures will be produced quarterly in conjunction with Community Education. C. Park programs shall be featured in the City Newsletter. r The Parks and Recreation Department shall •• • the Shakopee School District to distribute i• • u.••n. • r and posters in the oo r . r r i r r. a A reasonable and ongoing effort shall be made toeliminate all physical barriers which deter special populations (elderly, disabled, etc.) from using existing and future parks and recreational facilities. Barrier -free design principles shall be implemented in accordance with federal and state guidelines. b. Comprehensive active and passive recreation opportunities shall be provided for all age groups, and equitably distributed throughout the City of Shakopee. C. The City shall allow the usage of its facilities to groups who make their programs accessible to all residents as long as they do not conflict with regular City programs. d. The City shall consider initiating programs for those not being served by special interest groups or the private sector. e. The trail system shall accommodate a wide range of activities, including walking, hiking, running, bicycle riding, cross country skiing, and, where designated, snowmobiling and horseback riding. 3.3. Establish an effective, ongoing ffi of communicating and interacting with residents about issues related to parrs and recreation facilities, programs, and future development. a. Special meetings between the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and residents are encouraged when special development projects or issues arise. b_ Residents shall periodically be given the opportunity to participate in the planning process (i.e., through needs assessment studies, neighborhood meetings, community outreach, etc.) to ensure that their needs are understood and acted upon. t 1 I1 i • 11, Syst Master Plan II I q if < In 1998, the City of Shakopee reviewed it's existing park and trail system and prepared a forecast for park needs based on continuation of the city's park district planning concept. The analysis was done to help guide future park acquisition and development decisions and to update the park dedication fee system to equitably meet local needs. The following is a summary recreation system needs and study findings followed by a more detailed plan for park, recreation and trail facilities. M ff'ark, Recreation, Trail System Major Findings With the urban core area nearing full development, the City has developed a land use staging strategy to guide future residential growth to areas south of the Bypass in an orderly fashion. The growth areas, illustrated in the Land Use Element are separated from the existing parks located in the urban core area by the Shakopee Bypass. Expecting future residents, especially children, to cross the Bypass for recreational needs is obviously not acceptable_ To facilitate the planning of new residential neighborhoods with the appropriate park facilities, a park service district concept has been established. This conceptual plan is intended to promote and foster stronger relationships between residential neighborhoods and City parks. The plan can also help focus the City's efforts in the allocation of its limited resources for recreational needs in a wise manner. The forecast population and employment growth anticipated within each district is used to determine the number, type and general location of neighborhood and community parks. Figure P-6 illustrates the Five Park Service Districts: 1. original Shakopee 2. St Francis a 3. Dean 4. 11ighlands, Township 5. 1 1 1 I 1 i1 11 n 1 Pl By the year 2020, 310 acres of additional parkland will be needed to serve the projected population. This acreage is based on the population projections fisted in the Population, and Employment section in Volume 1 _ The parkland projections are based on the city standard of a minimum of one acre of parkland per 75 people. Table P -5 illustrates the parkland needs for each Park Service District. Q O eV O tV e rw� N V � V L G Q r.. 6d C� Cr LM _ � O O W � C .�i N = 'Q 0 P. Q + z Z v O v � L � i v O rn o o � d N n � � e 'CS _y c3 CJ G� N r.. 72 r O O VI v Q /1 C O O O O O O O O O W a \ _ � O O W � in M A y U CS cn .j O C T G1 t� Q U 0 a U 49 �+ A R 9 O 3 � L C � W tl4 � R � ti � 3 o c a — 'cs _ U O U y N O Qn N � � U O U � � 0 3 0 � U H y _ 9 o y c y o o - T � U � � U O � T C y G U C 7 U Q y 67 T � C O C .�i = 0 P. Q + z z v O v in M A y U CS cn .j O C T G1 t� Q U 0 a U 49 �+ A R 9 O 3 � L C � W tl4 � R � ti � 3 o c a — 'cs _ U O U y N O Qn N � � U O U � � 0 3 0 � U H y _ 9 o y c y o o - T � U � � U O � T C y G U C 7 U Q y 67 T � C O 9'w'-m tl9 H N N Y A = ca a C2. Q `a a a Q s .i Q. is cc c c �. b- = to CL R Q R CL ca 'O Q O O L .0 0 'O a 0-0 a 0 'v 0 ea C. C p Q 'a O O d t t t r = L 0 t= + ' C L L Z d 0 0 O to O 0= O O v m 0 0 E L.0 L L L L O L L L O L L M L L L O O L L L L t ® Ql •= O .= of O L ED .= L O ' p �f D1 .0 i p V C = 'm C N d 'i = ® i c04 c1 R cc ci to m V Ri V ca O R O ® O 17 O 7 O r O r O to CN 6� ® r O r C4 r ' CV r r ' C4 N r r CV CV CAD zn d ea t0 qltr O 6n O CN LO r O CN O C4 LO eF' ilk r° N CV O: CL L v ti Q L U) -O to ca O_ i r v d •® O Z V LO c r cm O.. z. .ar Q . + tj C ca r CJ = O C d in a 5° ie+ G E° 9'w'-m m M Tim C �w� C' On zi s us L ca �. Q cc c � U Q � 06 cn fn Q1 C U ® t t Qn m v0_ cn N U O O m — a) C .� Y m C to to cc O 0.72 to O c n- O C c O U 0 u 0 U U C O U O cn Q (a L C13 L c 0 0 Q C �. [c C13 r G � System expansion, diversification and intergovernmental coordination will be key to the Year 2020 Shakopee Park and Open Space System. Expansion is needed to stay consistent with population, household and employment growth demands for services and programs. Diversification is needed to match a growing and shifting population base. Intergovernmental coordination is needed to maximize state, regional and county programmed facilities and systems. A major component of Year 2020 park expansion will be the acquisition and development of neighborhood parks and community parks south of Highway 169. The City standard is the provision of one acre of park land for every 75 residents. The goal is to provide a balance on neighborhood, city - school, community parks and open space. Each park type provides a different function and contains different facilities- Neighborhood Park - The goal is to provide a 5 -10 acre neighborhood park within one - quarter to one -half mile service radius of residential development. On average, a neighborhood park should be designed to serve approximately 1,000 -1500 persons. Conveniently located, the parks shall provide the typical neighborhood activities for youth such as playgrounds, ball fields and field play. A small parking lot, picnic tables or benches, and paths or walkways are also typical elements. Selective development such as tennis courts, sliding hills, ice skating and park shelters and other more specialized facilities, may also be appropriate at the neighborhood level. Citv- School Parks ,7 Joint development of city- school parks is a logical and efficient public policy. Schools need play grounds, play equipment, and athletic fields and recreation facilities, for recess, school programs, and organized sports. Much of that activity takes place during weekday school hours. The facilities can be generally shared with general public users during after - school and weekends hours. Recreation areas associated with schools vary depending upon the type of school. Elementary schools need a play ground, play areas, and youth athletic fields. Depending upon the location and facilities, elementary school parks make also serve as neighborhood parks. Nfiddle and high schools focus more on larger athletic fields, indoor recreation areas, a greater variety of field and court space spectator facilities. City- school parks vary in size depending upon the type of school, but are generally 20- 50 acre sites. Community Parks - Vil Community parks are larger recreation spaces that provide community-wide active or passive recreation spaces 1 and facilities. Passive parks • provide opportunities for picnics, walking, bicycHn& nature study, boating, fishin& cross country skiing, and other passive uses. Passive parks are frequently located to preserve and use a significant natural i as a river, lake, stream, or forest. Open Space — Public preservation of open space serves many needs. Open space can offer visual relief and variety for developed areas, preserve significant natural resources (wetlands, streams, forests, prairies, etc.) and act as areas for trails. 0 Figure P-6 illustrates the pattern of existing and proposed parks to the year 2020. This plan is consistent with the standards listed below: 1. A minimum of one acre of parkland per 75 population. 2. A minimum of 7.0 acres of neighborhood parkland per 1000 population. 3. A minimum of 5.0 acres of community parkland per 1000 population. 4. Neighborhood and/or community parks should be spaced no more than one half mile apart and/or users should not have to cross major arterial streets. Existing parks should be taken into account to adjust the size and location of new parks. 6.. Neighborhood parks should be no smaller than five acres. However, ornamental parks and tot -lots in areas of high- density housing may be smaller. 7. Parks should have access from at least on Local or Collector level street and that access should be at least 300 feet in width. 8. Where possible the preferred vehicular access to parks should from a Collector street. 9. Parks should be located adjacent to schools if practical and otherwise advisable so as to share facilities and open space. 10. To avoid users crossing private property, pedestrian access corridors at least 30 feet in width should be acquired and constructed on park edges where there is no public street access reasonably close and to provide trail connections to other parks and community facilities. 11. Access to parklands should be provided by sidewalks and/or trails. The Metropolitan Council requires that a description of existing or proposed programs a nd ordinances ir, - rr •' to protect e reg•r •. rks be provided r th Comprehensive Plan- Since there are no regional parks existing or proposed in the City� no specif pr ograms or ordinance will be r ■ -• Another requirement from the Metropolitan Council involves the preparation of land use regulations to protect potential park areas from development prior to park acquisition - The Parks and Open Space Plan indicates general locations and sizes for future park sites. General Requirements 1. Park land shall be continuous and undivided by roadways, railroad tracks or other impassible barriers. 2. Park land shall be free from any contaminants or excess debris. Developer shall provide proof of previous land use to avoid the dedication of polluted ground - 3. Land shall be relatively accessible by roadway or trail easement and shall be located in an area that is easily accessed by neighborhood residents or by car - 4. Trail land shall be of sufficient width and slope to accommodate a 10' wide trail and appropriate buffer areas- General guidelines include a minimum width of 16-30' and a slope less than 12 percent with an average slope not to exceed four percent. Neighborhood Park 1. Land shall be continuous area of 5 to 10 acres and shall have a length/width ratio of no more than 3/1. Land adjacent to a public street shall have a minimum 300' frontage. 2- Land shall be centrally located within a neighborhood and easily accessed by pedestrian or bike. 3- At least 60 percent of the total area of land shall have a slope of less than or equal to four percent and shall not be located within a water detention area, drainage way, or any other water body. 4. At least 60 percent of the total land area shall be of solid sub e, excluding areas composed primarily of peat or wetland soils. In addition, the same percent of land area shall be covered with no less than six inches of topsoil and shall be clear of forest vegetation. 1. Land shall be continuous area of 25 -50 acres and shall have a length/width ratio of no more than 3/1. 2. Land shall be located on a collector or arterial street and be easily accessed by pedestrian or bike. 3. At least 90 percent of the total land area shall have a slope of less than or equal to four percent and shall not contain a water detention area, drainage way, or any other water body. 4. At least 90 percent of the total land area shall be of solid subgrade, excluding areas composed primarily of peat or wetland soils. In addition, the same percent of land area shall be covered with no less than six inches of topsoil and shall be clear of forest vegetation. Passive Recreation Area 1. Land shall be continuous area of 25-40 acres. 2. Land shall be easily accessed by pedestrian or bike, and also provide adequate car access by roadway. 3. At least 10 percent of the total land area shall have a slope of less than or equal to four percent and shall not contain a water detention area, drainage way, or any other water body. 4. At least 10 percent of the total land area shall be of solid upland soils, excluding areas composed primarily of peat or wetland soils. 5. Any wetland or wet prairie area shall have a diversity of more than two dominant plant species. 6. Desirable characteristics include varied and rolling terrain, a mix of forest and open grasslands, and scenic features such as: lake shore, river or stream frontage, and unique environmental features. Park / School Recreation Area (Jointly selected by the School District and City.) 1. Land shall be continuous area of 15 to 40 acres and shall have a length/width ratio of no more than 4/1. 2. Land shall be located directly adjacent to a school site and shall be easily and safely accessed by pedestrian, bike or automobile. Park and Open Space Acquisition Plan The Park, Recreation and Trail Master Plan (Figure P -b) is a general guide to future park and trail acquisition. The City of Shakopee requires developers to give land and/or cash at the time of plat approval to create new parks or improve existing parks for public purposes. For undeveloped areas of the City, and elsewhere as appropriate, the City may study candidate park locations; consult with potentially affected landowners; refer to park location standards, the Land Use Plan, and the Street System Plan; hold public meetings; and then bond or otherwise allocate money to purchase the desired sites. Acquisition funds may be repaid through cash exaction's, the general fund, grants, or land trades from developers. The City reserves the right to evaluate all proposals for park dedication purposes. Indoor Recreation Facilities Minnesota's winter climate limits outdoor sports and recreation participation to winter sports for 45 months per year. Therefore, the demand for indoor recreation space (gymnasiums, swimming pools, etc.) is higher than communities in warmer climates. Shakopee's Community Center is the primary public indoor recreation facility. It provides an ice rink, gym courts, a walking/running track, and a multi- purpose room for public use. Shakopee residents and business's have expressed interest in adding a second ice rink, a swimming pool, a fitness center; teen facilities, a children's indoor play area and a senior center. Expansion of the Community Center should occur in a logical phased manner as dictated by recreation needs, public support and availability of funding. Schools are the other major supplier of public indoor recreation space. However, due to a high level of school group demand, school facilities have limited availability for general public use. As new school facilities are built, the potential for shared gym use/funding should be evaluated. Other communities have found that a city - school partnership can result in more or larger gymnasiums being built with schools and public use of those gyms are allowed during evening and weekend hours. W Trail Physical A large portion of the City of Shakopee had periodic flooding problems for several decades. With the construction of the Shakopee Bypass, stormwater management issues had to be addressed or flooding problems would have increased. A stormwater management plan was developed by the City to address these issues. A major drainage corridor with a series of retention facilities became the central landscape feature in the urbanizing Shakopee area. A trail was built by the City along the drainage corridor which linked several neighborhoods with schools and parks. As a result, the Upper Valley Drainageway and Trail project has become an essential multi- purpose public facility for the growing community. The combination of the limited use of County Roads for trails and the popularity of the Upper Valley Trail has caused the City to readdress its trail planning concepts. In past trail planning efforts, the Transportation Plan has been used as the base map. With the use of computer aided drafting, staff has been able to combine the Stormwater Plan with the Transportation Plan on an overlay approach. This approach has allowed the identification of potential corridors located away from the County road system which can still provide linear routes for the proposed trail system. Consistent with the Park Service District Plan, the Trails Action Plan prioritizes the construction of City trails which will link residential neighborhoods with parks and open space areas. Figure P -5 illustrates the pattern of existing and proposed trails for the year. 2020. This plan is consistent with the trail standards listed below: . Trails should be the primary pedestrian circulation system in the rural service area_ 2. City trails should be connected with State, Regional and adjoining community trails where possible. City trails should be continuous with other trail systems and/or sidewalks in the City. 4. Trails should connect recreation and amenity areas with areas of potentially higher pedestrian and bicycle traffic volumes. 5. Trails should provide access in the City where sidewalks are deficient. Trail Acquisition Plan 69 Figures Tables P --1 Park Inventory P -2 Regional Open Space Inventory P -3 Trail System Inventory P-4 Shakopee Park Acreage Needs - 2020 P -5 Park Needs by Recreation Service District ka O O N N �U w Y co CL ,5 O O w m • U AT Y C6 11 N _ N N _ _ Q Q Q 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 'C7 � � � 'O � Y Y Y a) -O co O_ O_ O_ O_ O_ O_ a) a ca p 0 cm Y L O O L O -C O L O L O _ a O. ca L C C O O O O O O O O O O O O M a) cu !A f!) ¢ O 0 d d O` Y ..c s 0 r 0 s s o v c c a) -C cm CCs c`o CT Ca co CM U) CT CO M (n CT r � a o E (D m � � � _c _c o tL o tl m U) O n n. O 'M d 2 2 v U z z z z z z x = v O O 0 z r O N N O N � O C'D 'cf LO � O N r N C i O e- ll) N O O Y Y co O L t ,C L CB 5 tC _! 'O = O co ca O A (SS L C6 > Cn co 3 O .a :2 C= p -= C c� C> N A Z� "O N 0 0 Cn N t6 Q .= L O O` '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s? "Q O Z N CU N L E L L c , 3 E _ w CD O U tU aD U 3 O O O CU O O N U C4 0 0 _ ° L O CO 0 0 U W- (/J (n(nW(nW -3� �J O D Q W == Y 4. r.� 9 q- O O N s ct i r LE r L m g a to CD r O ° o ° o 0 0 0 C o °o ° 00 N m ° CD CD m CD CD CD o ° o ° o ° o ° o o ° 0 e- N C-4 0 0 0 O O p 0 10000 O o to to ° ot ° n a M Q r• n o r r ° _ O 0 O O OO O00 cn 0 0 00 °� 0o0 C� C f` 0 0 O ° m o°n N CD ° 0 0 ° 0 ° o ° °o_ °o 0 0 0 0 0 o_ CM 0 0 0 O r-_ N N ® cr O Q N 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 CD O O r O O 0 O 0 O t0 0 O O® 0 O 0 t0 t` O t0 N O O_ to CV O 0 (N O 0 r` co in O O to N N to m ® ® 4) ® O 'O = V y, W 3 lL W W N (a W W W C W® C W 0 W C tD W m W W m 0® a O N O d® W to N ® m W m m W N t9 c m® ® W W C W C m W ® m W O c O 0 w�j! O =a'a'�a' d ia'aQ W a���OQ: 0 0 a' O w a'� = Y Y Y �= Y = YY CYYY �Y J X YY CYY U. Y to W to tQ IQ (a W O �- O w W O �Y to to 5 8 0 w m w m` t0 w m O O 0 � LL tp C7 C7 a a a r- ® C7 0 L C7 O a a a a c9 a S2 - a QQ - � 5L� 25 25 � 25 25 25 25 25 � 25 25 25 5 25 5 r5 5 � 5 25 5 25 25 5 25 gad 25 5 25 5 � 5 25 5a� Z5 50 � Z5 2S N °°g 0�� °�8�8g�°� W ®CM 0 v a E > t L CL ®® m co co -° C ( CL ® m o w m ® ® ® m® c o ® ®® E O a . S W ®� B CL C CL G W O a. O a. O i t W> W V® C 0 -C -. r- Z ® a a+ ® ® C a O® m an O O m= W U C a E yrM C C C E to E W O�JVmom.. _= J rr T to t4 O C a3 O CA C 0 vD C fA C O O \. "E C t'o C Y O O w. O (C = CA yy 7 m a' Z O J W ® co C p m m W to O to a — 4= C to a c a co rn ® Y —U _ ® ® c co x •- a O OY c ® W W ��(( W ® ' ca = W ®+-.�+ cu ® EY a Y ® .le wY co a U> ,t� Z ta rtirn o a c aU u 0C O Oa. Y3CY��6L O O_ > aaa �� a m c GO C > 4o yr do co i"a Y tII a as mYY W to in ® a 3 a C J= (�_ N �zY `a a .+S C i ® b U rr O Q O a W a - C d (Q a (a O to p a L W L C O E —"E ® 3 E 3 E a L -0 3 > ®y tD L <j E O C a.L W t6 ({4 y E .®. m 7 7 3 • o to O O m •� m 7 ti m O W L W W J W Y la MxaMUVZOD .� mC)ft5J aYt - U rNM-W tO tD tD m mr`m mNto -rtO W) (D Z O H fn [n f!1 fn fn fn to rn m v1 fn fn W rn to 07 r!J to fn to fn VJ to rn O1 rn rA r!S cow Y Y Y Y Y Y ]C Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y j a c - wa: mix ao-a a-aq-da aa-o-o-o-o-ama -o�a .aaO-aD_a-a- m g a to CD r O CONSENT T: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Successful Completion of Probationary Period for Office Service Worker, Patty Latzke E G A : September 19, 2000 I lely . , Ms. Latzke was appointed to fill the position of Office Service Worker effective February 21, 2000, and her probationary period expired August 21, 2000. Ms. Latzke has made a positive contribution to managing the workload of the inspection division, and has also assisted in providing coverage for the customer service representative. Ms. Latzke's performance during the probationary period has been satisfactory, and the Council is asked to appoint her to full-time regular employment in the position of Office Service Worker. 1YNK I recommend that the Council find that Patty Latzke has successfully completed the 6- month probationary period, and afford her regular, full -time employment as Office Service Worker. Y 1 ► 1� Y 1111 The Council is asked to offer and pass a motion declaring that Patty Latzke has successfully completed the 6 -month probationary period, and afford her regular, full-time employment as Office Service Worker. R. Michael Leek Community Development Director ��. ® t CITE' OF SITAR ®PEE Memoranduin T®: Mayor & City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Termination of Probationary Status for Jesse Friendshuh DATE: September 19, 2000 IL A CON.SINT Jesse Friendshuh started working for the City on March 22, 2000 at Step 1 of the 2000 Pay Plan as a Maintenance Worker in the Public Works Department. His six months probationary period has been completed satisfactorily and it is recommended that his probationary status be terminated. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Move to terminate Jesse Friendshuh's probationary status. 2. Extend his probationary status another six months. 3. Terminate his employment with the City. 1 0 Terminate Jesse Friendshuh's probationary status. I 1 Move to terminate Jesse Friendshuh's probationary status. ZAI U Bruce Loney Public Works Director BL /pmp HAEG ® E , I If CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor & City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Termination of Probationary Status for Jess Haeg DATE: September 19, 2000 lTZI111►11 c f?"I'll", ' 7 m nk 71 �' k e Jess Haeg started working for the City on April 3, 2000 at Step 1 of the 2000 Pay Plan as a Maintenance Worker in the Public Works Department. His six months probationary period has been completed satisfactorily and it is recommended that his probationary status be terminated. 1. Move to terminate Jess Haeg's probationary status. 2. Extend his probationary status another six months. 3. Terminate his employment with the City. ffiMX fl ffMj KL - 1M [o] ►a Terminate Jess Haeg's probationary status. Move to terminate Jess Haeg's probationary status. Bruce Loney Public Works Director BL /pmp HAEG CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum co f %; a. il T TO: Mayor & City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Hiring of Maintenance Worker DATE: September 19, 2000 Public Work's Maintenance Worker candidates have been reviewed from a previous interview list and Scott County's certification list to fill the position vacated by Duane Toenyan. At this time, I am recommending that the City Council authorize the hiring of Keith Raines to fill the position. In the 2000 Budget, there are eleven Public Works Maintenance Worker positions authorized by City Council. One position was created by the departure of Duane Toenyan who resigned September 3, 2000. Staff utilized the Scott County Personnel Department for the selection process and in determining an interview list. The interview panel consisted of the Public Works Director, Public Works Supervisor, Street Lead Person, Park Lead Person and the City Administrator. After reviewing the result of the interview, application and reference check, the recommendation is to hire Keith Raines. His anticipated starting date is September 25, 2000 and would be contingent upon his successful pre - employment physical and background check. Budget t Impact: The advertised salary range for the Public Works Maintenance Worker position was listed at $14.26 per hour. This position is a non - exempt position, which allows the employee over time pay, and the prospective candidates have agreed to Step 1 of the 2000 Pay Schedule for Public Works employees, as included in the labor agreement which is $14.26 per hour. Staff recommends the hiring of Keith Raines for the Public Works Maintenance Worker position. 1 Move to authorize the hiring of Keith Raines as Public Works Maintenance worker and to be hired at Step 1 ($14.26/Hr.) of the 2000 Public Works Union Pay Schedule, effective September 25, 2000, and subject to a successful pre- employment physical and background check. 4 e g e Loney Public Works Director BL /pmp HIRED Cc: Marilyn Remer, Payroll Benefits Coordinator 17K To Mem TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director SUBJ: Awarding Sale of 2000A Improvement Bonds DATE: September 15, 2000 Introduction Council action is needed to award the sale of improvement bonds for 2000. Background The attached resolution was prepared by bond counsel to award the sale of improvement bonds for 2000. This is a routine event. The bonds being sold will finance the McGuire Muelhenhardt, Sarazin - Valley View to St. Francis, Gorman, Vierling - CR 17 to Miller, CR 17 widening and Vierling - Fuller to Orchard Park West projects. The resolution needs to be adopted at the September 19th Council meeting to complete the bond sale. It is expected that Springsted will bring a completed resolution to the council meeting. Springsted will make the presentation to Council of the results of the sale. Action Offer Resolution No. 5416 A Resolution Awarding The Sale Of $2,560,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 2000A, Fixing Their Form and Specifications; Directing Their Execution And Delivery; and Providing For Their Payment, and move its adoption. Gregg xland Finance Director N: \cash \bonds \bondsale RESOLUTION NO. 5416 ' •: • 1 1 1 • • 1, 111• FIXINGTBEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS, DIRECTING TB1 1` EXECUTION AND DELIVERY, 1 PROVIDING •' TBEIR PAYMENT BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota (City) as follows: Section 1. Sale of Bonds 1.01. The proposal of (Purchaser) to purchase $2,560,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2000A (Bonds) of the City described in the Terms of Proposal thereof is hereby found and determined to be a reasonable offer and is hereby accepted, the proposal being to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ plus accrued interest to date of delivery, for Bonds bearing interest as follows: Year of Interest Maturity Rate Year of Interest Maturity Rate 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 True interest cost: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 1.02. The sum of $ being the amount proposed by the Purchaser in excess of $2,534,400 will be credited to the Debt Service Fund hereinafter created. The City Finance Director is directed to deposit the good faith check of the Purchaser, pending completion of the sale of the Bonds, and to return the good faith checks of the unsuccessful proposers forthwith. The Mayor and City Clerk are directed to execute a contract with the Purchaser on behalf of the City. 1.03. The City will forthwith issue and sell the Bonds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 (Act) in the total principal amount of $2,560,000, originally dated October 1, 2000, in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, numbered No. R-1, upward, bearing interest as above set forth, and maturing serially on February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: SJB- 185941v1 SH155 -94 Year Amount Year Amount 2002 $250,000 2007 $240,000 2003 325,000 2008 240,000 2004 285,000 2009 240,000 2005 270,000 2010 240,000 2006 245,000 2011 225,000 1.04. Optional Redemption The City may elect on February 1, 2008, and on any day thereafter to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2009. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such manner as the City will determine_ If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify DTC (as defined in Section 7 hereof) of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. Section 2. Registration and Payment 2.01. Registered Form The Bonds will be issued only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, is payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. 2.02. Dates Interest Payment Dates Each Bond will be dated as of the last interest payment date preceding the date of authentication to which interest on the Bond has been paid or made available for payment, unless (i) the date of authentication is an interest payment date to which interest has been paid or made available for payment, in which case the Bond will be dated as of the date of authentication, or (ii) the date of authentication is prior to the first interest payment date, in which case the Bond will be dated as of the date of original issue. The interest on the Bonds is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 2001, to the registered owners of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not that day is a business day. 2.03. Registration The City will appoint a bond registrar, transfer agent, authenticating agent and paying agent (Registrar). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto are as follows: (a) Register The Registrar must keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar provides for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds Upon surrender for transfer of a Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an SJB- 185941v1 SH155 -94 attorney duly authorized by the registered owner In writing, the Registrar will authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until that interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds When Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar will authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation Bonds surrendered upon transfer or exchange will be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer When a Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the Bond until the Registrar is satisfied that the endorsement on the Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar will incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name a Bond is registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of the Bond, whether the Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on the Bond and for all other purposes and payments so made to registered owner or upon the owner's order will be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Pees and Char The Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof for a transfer or exchange of Bonds, sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to the transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds If a Bond becomes mutilated or is destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar will deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of the mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that the Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it and as provided by law, in which both the City and the Registrar must be named as obligees. Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar will be cancelled by the Registrar and evidence of such cancellation must SJB- 185941v1 SH155 -94 be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it is not necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Redemption In the event any of the Bonds are called for redemption, notice thereof identifying the Bonds to be redeemed will be given by the Registrar by mailing a copy of the redemption notice by first class mail (postage prepaid) to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at the address shown on the registration books kept by the Registrar and by publishing the notice if required by law. Failure to give notice by publication or by mail to any registered owner, or any defect therein, will not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of Bonds. Bonds so called for redemption will cease to bear interest after the specified redemption date, provided that the funds for the redemption are on deposit with the place of payment at that time. 2.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar The City appoints U.S. Bank Trust National Association, St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Clerk are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with the Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, the resulting corporation is authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar upon 30 days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar must deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and must deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of this Council, the City Finance Director must transmit to the Registrar monies sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due. 2.05. Execution Authentication and Deli very The Bonds will be prepared under the direction of the City Clerk and executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Clerk, provided that those signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. If an officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature appears on the Bonds ceases to be such officer before the delivery of a Bond, that signature or facsimile will nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, a Bond will not be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on the Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on a Bond is conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Clerk will deliver the same to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser is not obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. SJB- 185941v1 SH155 -94 2.06. Temporary Bonds The City may elect to deliver in lieu of printed definitive Bonds one or more typewritten temporary Bonds in substantially the form set forth in Section 3 with such changes as may be necessary to reflect more than one maturity in a single temporary bond. Upon the execution and delivery of definitive Bonds the temporary Bonds will be exchanged therefor and cancelled. Section 3. Form of Bond 3.01. The Bonds will be printed or typewritten in substantially the following form: [Face of the Bond] 01 Me UNITED STATES OF 1 STATE OF II ! • COUNTY OF • CITY OF •, • • • : • 1 1.. • I : • 1 ' 1 111 Date of Rate Maturity Original Issue CUSIP October 1, 2000 Registered Owner: Cede & Co. The City of Shakopee, Minnesota, a duly organized and existing municipal corporation in Scott County, Minnesota (City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the Registered Owner specified above or registered assigns, the principal sum of $ on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the annual rate specified above, payable February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 2001, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by U.S. Bank Trust National Association, St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Paying Agent, Transfer Agent and Authenticating Agent, or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. SJB- 185941v1 SH155 -94 The City may elect on February 1, 2008, and on any day thereafter to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2009. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such manner as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify Depository Trust Company (DTC) of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. The City Council has designated the issue of Bonds of which this Bond forms a part as "qualified tax exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code) relating to disallowance of interest expense for financial institutions and within the $10 million limit allowed by the Code for the calendar year of issue. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $2,560,000 all of like original issue date and tenor, except as to number, maturity date, redemption privilege, and interest rate, all issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on September 19, 2000 (the Resolution), for the purpose of providing money to defray the expenses incurred and to be incurred in making local improvements, pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and the principal hereof and interest hereon are payable from special assessments against property specially benefited by local improvements and from ad valorem taxes for the City's share of the cost of the improvements, as set forth in the Resolution to which reference is made for a full statement of rights and powers thereby conferred. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably pledged for payment of this Bond and the City Council has obligated itself to levy additional ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City in the event of any deficiency in special assessments and taxes pledged, which additional taxes may be levied without limitation as to rate or amount. The Bonds of this series are issued only as fully registered Bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof of single maturities. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing, upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange_ The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar will be affected by any notice to the contrary. SJB- 185941v1 SH155 -94 IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required, and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness. This Bond is not valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon has been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile or manual signatures of the Mayor and City Clerk and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Dated: (Facsimile) (Facsimile) City Clerk Mayor SJB- 185941vl SH155 -94 511:1 a I • I • This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. • . • . • Authorized Representative The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, will be constructed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UNIF GIFT MIN ACT Custodian in common (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT -- as tenants under Uniform Gifts or by entireties Transfers to Minors JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and Act . . . . . . . . . . . . not as tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer the said Bond on the books kept for registration of the within Bond, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Notice: The assignor's signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. SJB- 185941v1 SH155 -94 Signature Guaranteed: NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a financial institution that is a member of the Securities Transfer Agent Medallion Program ( "STAMP "), the Stock Exchange Medallion Program ("SENT"), the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Medallion Signatures Program ( "MSP ") or other such "signature guarantee program" as may be determined by the Registrar in addition to, or in substitution for, STAMP, SENT or MSP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Bond Registrar will not effect transfer of this Bond unless the information concerning the assignee requested below is provided. Name and Address: (Include information for all joint owners if this Bond is held by joint account.) Please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee SJB- 185941vl SH155 -94 PROVISIONS AS TO REGISTRATION The ownership of the principal of and interest on the within Bond has been registered on the books of the Registrar in the name of the person last noted below. Date of Registration Registered Owner Signature of Officer of Regis trar 3.02. The City Clerk is directed to obtain a copy of the proposed approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, Minnesota, which is to be complete except as to dating thereof and to cause the opinion to be printed on or accompany each Bond. Section 4. Payment Securit - Pledges and Covenants 4.01. (a) The Bonds are payable from the Improvement Bonds, Series 2000A Debt Service Fund (Debt Service Fund) hereby created, and the proceeds of general taxes hereinafter levied (Taxes), and special assessments (Assessments) levied or to be levied for the improvements described in the resolution authorizing the sale of the Bonds (Improvements) financed by the Bonds are hereby pledged to the Debt Service Fund. If a payment of principal or interest on the Bonds becomes due when there is not sufficient money in the Debt Service Fund to pay the same, the City Finance Director is directed to pay such principal or interest from the general fund of the City, and the general fund will be reimbursed for the advances out of the proceeds of Assessments and Taxes when collected. There is appropriated to the Debt Service Fund (i) capitalized interest financed from Bond proceeds, if any, (ii) any amount over the minimum purchase price paid by the Purchaser, and (iii) the accrued interest paid by the Purchaser upon closing and delivery of the Bonds. (b) The proceeds of the Bonds, less the appropriations made in paragraph (a), together with any other funds appropriated for the Improvements and Assessments and Taxes collected during the construction of the Improvements will be deposited in a separate construction fund (which may contain separate accounts for each Improvement) to be used solely to defray expenses of the Improvements and the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds prior to the completion and payment of all costs of the Improvement. Any balance remaining in the construction fund after completion of the Improvements may be used to pay the cost in whole or in part of any other improvement instituted under the Act. When the Improvements are completed and the cost thereof paid, the construction account is to be closed and subsequent collections of Assessments and Taxes for the Improvements are to be deposited in the Debt Service Fund. Cede & Co. Federal ID #13- 2555119 SJB- 185941v1 SH155 -94 4.02. It is hereby determined that the Improvements will directly and indirectly benefit abutting property, and the City hereby covenants with the holders from time to time of the Bonds as follows: (a) The City has caused or will cause the Assessments for the Improvements to be promptly levied so that the first installment will be collectible not later than 2001 and will take all steps necessary to assure prompt collection, and the levy of the Assessments is hereby authorized. The City Council will cause to be taken with due diligence all further actions that are required for the construction of each Improvement financed wholly or partly from the proceeds of the Bonds, and will take all further actions necessary for the final and valid levy of the Assessments and the appropriation of any other funds needed to pay the Bonds and interest thereon when due. (b) In the event of any current or anticipated deficiency in Assessments and Taxes, the City Council will levy additional ad valorem taxes in the amount of the current or anticipated deficiency_ (c) The City will keep complete and accurate books and records showing: receipts and disbursements in connection with the Improvements, Assessments and Taxes levied therefor and other funds appropriated for their payment, collections thereof and disbursements therefrom, monies on hand and, the balance of unpaid Assessments. (d) The City will cause its books and records to be audited at least annually and will furnish copies of such audit reports to any interested person upon request. 4.03. It is determined that at least 20% of the cost of the Improvements will be specially assessed against benefited properties. For the purpose of paying the principal of and interest on the Bonds, there is levied a direct annual irrepealable ad valorem tax (Taxes) upon all of the taxable property in the City, which will be spread upon the tax rolls and collected with and as part of other general taxes of the City. The taxes will be credited to the Debt Service Fund above provided and will be in the years and amounts as follows (year stated being year of levy for collection the following year): Year Levy (See Attachment A) 4.04. It is hereby determined that the estimated collections of Assessments and the foregoing Taxes will produce at least five percent in excess of the amount needed to meet when due the principal and interest payments on the Bonds. The tax levy herein provided is irrepealable until all of the Bonds are paid, provided that at the time the City makes its annual tax levies the City Clerk may certify to the County Auditor of Scott County the amount available in the Debt Service Fund to pay principal and interest due during the ensuing year, and the County Auditor will thereupon reduce the levy collectible during such year by the amount so certified. SJB- 185941vl SH155 -94 4.05. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Scott County and to obtain the certificate required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.63_ Section 5. Authentication of Transcript 5.01. The officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to the attorneys approving the Bonds, certified copies of proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds and to the financial condition and affairs of the City, and such other certificates, affidavits and transcripts as may be required to show the facts within their knowledge or as shown by the books and records in their custody and under their control, relating to the validity and marketability of the Bonds, and such instruments, including any heretofore furnished, may be deemed representations of the City as to the facts stated therein. 5.02. The Mayor, City Clerk and Finance Director are authorized and directed to certify that they have examined the Official Statement prepared and circulated in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and that to the best of their knowledge and belief the Official Statement is a complete and accurate representation of the facts and representations made therein as of the date of the Official Statement. Section 6. Tax Covenant 6.01. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, in effect at the time of such actions, and that it will take or cause its officers, employees or agents to take, all affirmative action within its power that may be necessary to ensure that such interest will not become subject to taxation under the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations, as presently existing or as hereafter amended and made applicable to the Bonds. 6.02. (a) The City will comply with requirements necessary under the Code to establish and maintain the exclusion from gross income of the interest on the Bonds under Section 103 of the Code, including without limitation requirements relating to temporary periods for investments, limitations on amounts invested at a yield greater than the yield on the Bonds, and the rebate of excess investment earnings to the United States if the Bonds (together with other obligations reasonably expected to be issued in calendar year 2000) exceed the small- issuer exception amount of $5,000,000. (b) For purposes of qualifying for the small- issuer exception to the federal arbitrage rebate requirements, the City finds, determines and declares that the aggregate face amount of all tax - exempt bonds (other than private activity bonds) issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during the calendar year in which the Bonds are issued is not reasonably expected to exceed $5,000,000, within the meaning of Section 148(f)(4)(C) of the Code. SJB- 185941v1 SH155 -94 6.03. The City further covenants not to use the proceeds of the Bonds or to cause or permit them or any of them to be used, in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be "private activity bonds" within the meaning of Sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code. 6.04. In order to qualify the Bonds as "qualified tax- exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code, the City makes the following factual statements and representations: (a) the Bonds are not "private activity bonds" as defined in Section 141 of the , (b) the City hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax- exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; (c) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax- exempt obligations (other than any private activity bonds that are not qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) which will be issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during calendar year 2000 will not exceed $10,000,000; and (d) not more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the City during calendar year 2000 have been designated for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. 6.05. The City will use its best efforts to comply with any federal procedural requirements which may apply in order to effectuate the designations made by this section. Section 7. Book -Entry System: Limited Obligation of City 7.01. The Bonds will be initially issued in the form of a separate single typewritten or printed fully registered Bond for each of the maturities set forth in Section 1.03 hereof. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of each Bond will be registered in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, and its successors and assigns (DTC). Except as provided in this section, all of the outstanding Bonds will be registered in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. 7.02. With respect to Bonds registered in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, the City, the Bond Registrar and the Paying Agent will have no responsibility or obligation to any broker dealers, banks and other financial institutions from time to time for which DTC holds Bonds as securities depository (Participants) or to any other person on behalf of which a Participant holds an interest in the Bonds, including but not limited to any responsibility or obligation with respect to (i) the accuracy of the records of DTC, Cede & Co. or any Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any Participant or any other person (other than a registered owner of Bonds, as shown by the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar,) of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any Participant or any other person, other than a registered owner of Bonds, of any amount with SJB- 185941v1 SH155 -94 respect to principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The City, the Bond Registrar and the Paying Agent may treat and consider the person in whose name each Bond is registered in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar as the holder and absolute owner of such Bond for the purpose of payment of principal, premium and interest with respect to such Bond, for the purpose of registering transfers with respect to such Bonds, and for all other purposes. The Paying Agent will pay all principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or on the order of the respective registered owners, as shown in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar, and all such payments will be valid and effectual to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than a registered owner of Bonds, as shown in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar, will receive a certificated Bond evidencing the obligation of this resolution. Upon delivery by DTC to the City Administrator of a written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the words "Cede & Co.," will refer to such new nominee of DTC; and upon receipt of such a notice, the City Administrator will promptly deliver a copy of the same to the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent. 7.03. Representation Letter The City has heretofore executed and delivered to DTC a Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations (Representation Letter) which shall govern payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and notices with respect to the Bonds. Any Paying Agent or Bond Registrar subsequently appointed by the City with respect to the Bonds will agree to take all action necessary for all representations of the City in the Representation letter with respect to the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent, respectively, to be complied with at all times. 7.04. Transfers Outside Book -Entry S sy tem In the event the City, by resolution of the City Council, determines that it is in the best interests of the persons having beneficial interests in the Bonds that they be able to obtain Bond certificates, the City will notify DTC, whereupon DTC will notify the Participants, of the availability through DTC of Bond certificates. In such event the City will issue, transfer and exchange Bond certificates as requested by DTC and any other registered owners in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving notice to the City and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. In such event, if no successor securities depository is appointed, the City will issue and the Bond Registrar will authenticate Bond certificates in accordance with this resolution and the provisions hereof will apply to the transfer, exchange and method of payment thereof. 7.05. Payments to Cede & Co_ Notwithstanding any other provision of this Resolution to the contrary, so long as a Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, payments with respect to principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bond and notices with respect to the Bond will be made and given, respectively in the manner provided in DTC's Operational Arrangements, as set forth in the Representation Letter. SJB- 185941vl SH155 -94 Section 8. Continuing Disclosure 8.01. The City hereby covenants and agrees that it will comply with and carry out all of the provisions of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Resolution, failure of the City to comply with the Continuing Disclosure Certificate is not to be considered an event of default with respect to the Bonds; however, any Bondholder may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandate or specific performance by court order, to cause the City to comply with its obligations under this section. 8.02. "Continuing Disclosure Certificate" means that certain Continuing Disclosure Certificate executed by the Mayor and City Administrator and dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds, as originally executed and as it may be amended from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof. SJB- 185941vl SH155 -94 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. SJB- 185941v1 SH155 -94 ZDDco ZD--1 - 0 M C') �-+ << O CD N- O N 0 N 00 N 0 N w N W N (p N (D N W N CD N 00 O O N- CD CD = r + Cn -I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N r+ 3 Q C7 D r+ "'< ¢� C.0 cm c CO \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ Cn O r4 CD CD (D r+ O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N D Sv - 3 -i+ CD 23 CD r+ 00000 000000000000000 w r0 .. y -) -) 1_► _100 000000000000000 rl CD < CO D) O Cl) CDC 100(.0 C.00 wvv00 CncnA ?w wNN CD CD r+ r+ • • CA O OCD fv CD cD ;v CD c .. - 3 r+ r c S9 cr c o - 0 F' C7 Cn N r+ r+ rr `< 0_ N cn N N N N N N N N Cl) N Fr• CO W CD .. i r+ CA N A A A A A -I co N Cn CD O A O m O o 0 O (n 0 cn Cn O n < a - ,. .. F . w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -a r- (n r• rn o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (u o - :3 A A Ui Co) O O 0 O O O 0 o O O O r CD CO CD �rnrnc� CD Cn - s O c0 CD 1 W � w 0) A A A A A A A A A A N• r+ o\ o\° w ' Cl) CD SD CD CO __4 - I W Cn U1 A N w O Cn O Cn O 0 V, O Cn Cn Ul r+ O O 0 O O O O O O O CD NO O O D S9 Efl 0fa (M co v — — — - r%) W co W W AA Cn U101CD 03 cn -y -4- 4 W W (D(DCnOCA) Cl) co __4 F+ C.0 0 O U7 (P A A -� — v v W W W 07 CD O N N w W O Cb r+ CD -S N M (A A A A A CO 00 0 0 CZ) CO M (1 CD CO W W M 0 CD O O O m m m w w w w w W w N N v v m w v v O O -1 0 0 0 -J V ­4 -4 -4 -4 -4 -4 -4 -4 Cn CI Ol Ol ­ -4 (;1 Cn 0 0 cn coo Cn Cn (n cn CJI(n Cn Cn ul cn O O O 0 UI cn O O O O r+ W N N N N N N N w W W w W W CD W N) -4 W OW W A-1UtO(D A O Cn 1 — v v N N w Cb Cb W CD CD 1 O CO W CO -! - O Ut U7 A A — s v v CO W CO CO O CD N N W W O 00 N Cn O A A A co w O O w 00 V7 Ul CD 0 0) Cn m O 0 0o Co co co co co Co Cb CO 00 N N ­4 ­4 CO Oo -1 -1 0 0 O r+ o vvII V V V V V: - 4 ' - 4 �4 6' MOO w O U1Cilcna Ul Cn cn 0000 r S9 W N N N N N N co co w A A CO W CA �I m CD -+ A -I W 0 A O N A Cn O N (0 -4 s W 0 -• M N U7 W v (D Cn v A w D N W co CC �! — O j CD w m `< O 0 -4 -4 -4 � -4 U, cn v Cr O a c CD c 0 o cn cn cn cn o o cn o o :3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r+ r w CD W N N N N W Cl) co W A A O CO A -J co (D 1 N O) (D U7 N r+ Cn ­4 O co O j Oo v 0) W CA -1 CD O O co A A A A w w N A A Cn A O j v N O Cn O cn W Cl) -! (D A j w N A o \o D .69) N N Cn O N 0) s W A Cn W s A (D -I Cn - O O y w O j N co m N a CD A D y O W Cl) W -S A v M W C D O O H. " C/A a) CA -0 V W CD A (D U1 (T v v V Cn r+ W Cn W O < - 1 j 1 A O CD 1 N (D Cl) N A Cn r (n r O CD "O c CD C1 Cn CD - 0 2) 0 0 0 - 1 cn SI) Sw H CD F+• r+ r+ Z Q N CD CD W CD •• •• Cl) Cn .. i CD m - a O r+ -0 1 CD A cn (n Ut Cn A Ul A Cn O w D N O O H a Cn Cn -I cyl v v A '< n \ \ O CS ,. .. .. .. a r+ Cn j 0 CD N C, -+ 00 N W O 1 Cn w CD c C) O -` O - 3 -+ A 0 Cn (D A W O Cn A = w O\ \ A 0 v co co N N Ul 0 O r+ r •- N N - O 1 O O O O CD O O O N N N N N N N N N N - G r' N CD C O O O O O O 0 O O O CD CD O. O O O O O o O O O O O SD - 3 < CD co co v CA Cn A W N 0 •< C�'j �27.29 MILLION� IN ZEBT� VFGRAbEDRT0 A1� TRQM�A�Z Shakopee (City of) MN Municipality Minnesota Issue M�_ General obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 20001 l Sale Amount $2,560,000 Expected Sale Date 09119/00 Rating Description General Obligation (ULT) Moody's believes the city will maintain its sound financial position due to conservative budgeting and continued tax base growth. The General Fund balance is sufficient to meet both cash flow and contingency requirements. The city has had consistent operating surpluses the past 7 years, except for a planned r own in fiscal 1997 due to pay-as-you-go financing. The General Fund 09/18/2000 16:49 ET REF: H0002064.0000 FRAODYS T0:9524453856 Page 2 of 2 FY99 General Fund balance: $4.7 million (56% of General Fund revenues) ANALYSTS. John Craig, Analyst, Public Finance Group, Moody's Investors Service Dianne Golub, Senior Credit officer, Public Finance Group, Moody's Investors Service CONTACTS: Journalists: (212) 553-0376 Research Clients: 62129 553-1625 85 E. SEVENTH PLACE, SUITE 100 SAINT PAUL, MN 55101 -2887 651- 223 -3000 FAX: 651-223-3002 SPRNGSTE Public Finance Advisors $2,560,000 CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2000A AWARD: MILLER, JOHNSON & KUEHN, INC. BERNARD[ SECURITIES, INCORPORATED SALE: September 19, 2000 Moody °s Rating: Al Interest Net Interest True Interest Bidder Rates Price Cost Rate MILLER, JOHNSON & KUEHN, INC. 4.25% 2002 BERNARDI SECURITIES, INCORPORATED 4.35% 2003 4.45% 2004 4.50% 2005 4.55% 2006 4.60% 2007 4.70% 2008 4.75% 2009 4.90% 2010 4.95% 2011 $2,545,024.00 $688,996.00 4.7990% U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY INC. 4.30% 2002 4.40% 2003 4.45% 2004 4.50% 2005 -2006 4.60% 2007 4.65% 2008 4.70% 2009 4.75% 2010 4.85% 2011 $2,534,400.00 $691,947.50 4.8366% (Continued) SAINT PAUL, MN • MINNEAPOLIS, MN • MILWAUKEE, WI • OVERLAND PARK, KS • WASHINGTON, DC • DES MOINES, IA 15 s 1 s CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Gregg Voxland, Finance Director SUBJ: Quest Easement DATE: September 15, 2000 Introduction Quest (U.S.West) has requested an easement on city property utilized by SPUC on the corner of 10 and Spencer. Background Quest is requesting an easement for a 10 x 30 foot area in the NE corner of the well and pump house site (not in ROW). SPUC has given their OK. There would be telecommunications cabinets installed to increase and upgrade capacity. Should there be a fee for the easement? Staff has not received a review comment on the easement from the City Attorney as of the time this memo was written. Recommendation Approve the easement with the provision that the City can require Quest to vacate the premises at any time when the City needs the land. / Zl ,- -f- i n n 1 Revised memo incorporating any changes from the City Attorney is expected to be on the table for the meeting. Gregg Voxland Finance Director C: \gregg \memo \Quest1.doc F. �.l - a, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) ice o e 171recior Washington, DC 20530 September 11, 2000 Chief Dan Hughes Shakopee Police Department 476 Gorman Street Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: Grant for Shakopee Police Department NIN07004 Dear Chief Hughes: It is with great pleasure that I write to inform you that your Department will receive a COPS in Schools grant award for 2 new, additional full -time officers and 0 part-time officers at an estimated cost of $250,000.00. This is an estimated amount of federal funds to be awarded to your jurisdiction for a three year period. The grant award start date is September 1, 2000, which means that you can be reimbursed for salaries and benefits of additional officers hired after this date. Upon budget approval for the officer positions, you will receive a grant award that will provide your actual award amount for this announcement. To accept your grant, please sign the award document and return it to the COPS Office within 90 days. Failure to submit the signed award document in this 90 day period could result in COPS withdrawing you from the grant program and de- obligating your agency's funding from this grant program. We are pleased that your Department has elected to participate in the COPS in Schools grant program and look forward to working with you in a productive partnership to further your community policing efforts. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the COPS Office at 1- 800 -421 -6770. Your grant advisor will be happy to provide you with assistance. Sincerely, Thomas Frazier Director