HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.g. SPUC Contribution Funding Formula RESOLUTION #672
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CERTAIN PAYMENTS
FROM THE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 1 J
TO THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
WHEREAS, the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission has
historically contributed from its resources to the City of Shakopee
General. Fund, and
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee has considered the adoption of
a franchise fee to be imposed upon all energy providers within the
City, although its action thereon has not been completed, and
WHEREAS, the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission believes it
would be beneficial to the City and the Utilities Commission to
• establish a basis for the payment of an amount to the City which
would be equivalent to a franchise fee on its electric services
revenues, utilizing some of the factors under consideration by the
City, and
•
WHEREAS, the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission has
determined that this approach to the contribution to the City will
Permit the Commission to achieve an equitable balance between
support-of the City's General Frund and maintaining rates that are
fair to the Commission's customers and which will sustain. the
Commission's ability to provide reliable electric service at a
competitive price, and
WHEREAS, the Commission desires to confirm the basis of the
transfer to the City from water operations is unchanged by this
Resolution,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following contributions
from the electric and water utility operations shall be made by the
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission to the General Fund of the
City for the year 2002 and subsequent years, until such further
action as may be taken by the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission:
Payment on
Electric Gross Sales
Residential _ $$ SS
Commercial
Industrial SS
Customer Late Fees
Total Gross Electric Sales $$
Times 2.71% 0.0271
Payment to City
from Electric Operations SS
•
Payment on
Water Gross Margin
Water Sales SS
Total Gross Water Sales' SS
Less Cost of Energy for pumping: $$
Gross Water Margin $$
Times 23.77% 0.2377
Payment to City
from Water Operations $$
•
•
•
•
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that energy for street lighting and
the cost of Maintenance and operation of street lights will
continue to be donated to the.City of Shakopee consistent with the
past practices of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the payments due to the City
pursuant to the foregiong schedule and the determination of gross
sales shall be based on the corresponding figures contained in the
audited financial statements of the Shakopee Public Utilities
Commisiion for the year 2002 and thereafter. Until those figures
are available, monthly payments shall be made to the City
commencing in January 2002 and each month thereafter equal to one-
twelfth
(1/12) of the annual payment due, estimated on the basis
of the gross sales figures reflected in the audited financial
statements of Shakopee Public Utilities Commission for the year
2000, rounded down to the nearest $1,000. Upon the availabaility
of the audited financial statements for the year 2002, a
determination will be made if an over or under payment has been
• made for the year 2002 and that difference will be remitted to the
City of Shakopee or refunded to the Shakopee Public Utilities
Commission. This procedure shall be followed in subsequent years,
substituting the appropriate year under consideration.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following Resolutions of the
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission shall be repealed, effective
on the date of the adoption of this Resolution: Numbers 193, 272,
385 and 553 and, effective upon completion of the last payment due
in respect to year 2001, Number 409.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the payments and services
authorized to be provided hereunder are subordinate to the
obligation of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission to timely
pay principal and interest upon its outstanding bonds and is
further subject to reconsideratiion in the event of unforeseen
events which may adversely affect the utility operations or the
best interests of the utilities customers of Shakopee Public
•Utilities Commission.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all. things necessary to carry out
the terms and purposes of this Resolution are hereby authorized and
performed.
Passed in regular session of the Shakopee Public Utilities
Commission this 3rd day of December, 2001.
Commi) 1,144..
Predident: Joan Lynch
ATTEST:
4111111
Commissi 'n 8e ; to y: Jerry Fox
•
... :et ?iii y . A't "{�- 1•.- _.
• a"L'.... •
' •' ' ,t '� �.Y 'ti y+T �k mss. _ "' 1 � f
.r
•
- r
f �
. Y'�... �.�•RC -� . .r.. G..siM..� '.4 . Y,.". -! .}-_ .�i rl. �_F...x _ I �..1: t
1
• 3 5
•
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and City Council and Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
`i.
FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Franchise Fee Discussion
DATE: September 6, 2007
INTRODUCTION: •
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide general background information on
implementation of a franchise fee in Shakopee, and to determine whether there is
sufficient interest to pursue this further.
BACKGROUND:
•
In September, 2000, the City of Shakopee held a public information meeting regarding
the possible implementation of a franchise fee which would be applied to all utilities
operating within the City. At the meeting, several large users that are served by utilities
other than SPUC made their case for this being an added cost of doing business which
would reduce their competitiveness. •
The intent of the proposal was to be revenue neutral. In other words, if a franchise fee
were enacted, SPUC would reduce their rates so that there would be no net change on
SPUC users. SPUC was not able to make that commitment at the time. $875,000 was
the amount that the franchise fee would raise; it would have reduced SPUC's transfer to
$343,000 annually. However, it was noted during testimony at the 2000 meeting that 6
industries would have made up 50% ofthe difference (industries which had not been
directly contributing previously).
The City used Attorney Jim Strommen of Kennedy and. Graven to assist in that research.
I recently spoke with him to see if anything had changed in the industry over the past
seven years regarding this issue. He said that at the time of the 2000 discussion, it was a
very difficult time for implementation of franchise fees. While utilities are still not
currently in favor of franchise fees, they were significantly more opposed to them at that
time. This was in the era before Enron, and rolling power outages in California. The
assumption of utilities, and the public at large in 2000 was that there would be
"wheeling ", and a general ability to purchase power anywhere; a franchise fee would
raise overall rates. Obviously, the situation has changed since that time.
In addition, Mr. Strommen also noted that because of reductions in State aids and other
sources of funding, the public seems to be a bit more accepting of franchise fees as one of
the components ofthe funding of government.
•
Implementation:
Whatever is enacted for one utility will need to be enacted for all utility users — in j
Shakopee, that would include Xcel Energy, MVEC, and Centerpoint Energy, Shakopee
is unique in that it has four providers, twice as many as is usual. Because a franchise fee
•
needs to be negotiated with each utility, the process is more complex.
There are two ways of enacting a franchise fee:
1. Meter Fee: This is a fixed charge, typically $1 to $2 per residential customer,
and a higher flat fee for commercial/industrial users.
2. Percent of Gross Revenue: Typically 1 or 2%
Commercial and industrial users (and the utility companies) prefer the meter fee — its
more predictable, and generates less revenue than the percent of gross revenue. The
percent of gross revenue is more complicated due to demand charges.
Because these are a "pass- through" fee, the utilities typically will list these charges as a
separate line item showing a "City Franchise Fee ".
In 2000, there were only a few major industrial users that would have been impacted by
this, and according to testimony at the meeting, those "six" consumed as much energy as
the rest of SPUC's residential customers combined. That has changed somewhat with the
subsequent growth of the residential component of Shakopee. It should also be noted that
one of the companies with concerns in 2000 — Rahr Malting — might not be subject to
large parts of a franchise fee (if at all) within the next year to due their KODA energy
project. Other major users have rec; ntly had issues with bankruptcy. Another one was
not opposed in 2000, but requested advance notice to build the franchise fee into their
budget.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Following discussion, SPUC and City staff will ask for direction as to whether this is an
issue that is of interest and more research is desired, or whether no action contemplated at
this time.
Mark McNeill
City Administrator
MM:th
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
•
SUBJECT: Franchise Fee Cities
DATE: September 11, 2007
•
As follow up to the Monday night joint meeting with SPUC, I am providing an
attachment which show the Xcel cities that have an electric franchise fee.
As shown, about 2/3 of these have a flat fee enacted, the balance are based on a
percentage of use.
When Councilor Lehman asked whether this would be something that would be
applicable to SPUC customers, I responded in the negative — SPUC has already set their
fees to allow for the equivalent franchise fee from SPUC customers. However, in .
thinking further about that, depending on this is structured, the Council could add a
franchise fee for SPUC customers as well, should there be the desire to do that.
But as this would be applicable to all energy users, Centerpointe Energy (Minnegasco)
customers would also see this as a line item. Most of those customers are also SPUC
ratepayers as well.
Also, in order to "level the playing field" and to generate the sorts of dollars that would
be needed to fully off -set what SPUC's transfer had been in 2001, the City would
probably need to go with an increase which is based on percentage, rather than a flat fee.
In other words, a flat fee such as those shown on the attachment would likely not be an
issue for the large users, but it also wouldn't generate any where near what the percentage
has been.
As stated at the Monday night meeting, two of the remaining large customers have
recently gone through bankruptcy proceedings. This will not help their situation.
The issue of payment in lieu of taxes for the Blue Lake Peaking Plant would likely
impact the franchise fee discussion with Xcel.
For your information.
•
•
.
• '
Xcei Energy Sheet 1 of 6
Minnesota Electric Service- City Fees Updated 06/01/2007
•
FRANCHISE FEES
A franchise fee as designated will be included in the customers' monthly bills computed under the indicated customer classes effective in the }-
• following Minnesota communities:
•
- Indicates fee is not applied
(U) indicates unincorporated community
e otS i i rf y . 0 _ _•._ rn a ? Y o a O'a a >,
.a z . ro� m L .c o.v v , n:.� c ''
i nn . m asE a s-° �Ec -� cEE d c w {
�' ,m E o E - a , ' 3 a� o o . o o m x C
v ,,.x ' wz rn a t Paz �c o w t wn,
Afton $2.00 $2.00 $5.00 $5.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 0 1/2 0 05 : . 08/16/ 2024. I •
Baker (U) a $3.25 $3.25 - - • - - .
Brooklyn Center $1.48 $3.00 $20.00 $96.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 02/2004• ,;,12/08/2023
Coon Rapids b 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% - - - 0711992 01/13/2012;:,
Cottage Grove $125 $125 $625 $25.00 $2.50 $0.63 $6.25 01/2007- 1170412023;
Deephaven $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 '04/2002 • '4 311/2012
Dilworth $1.75 $4.00 $14.00 $91.00 - $4.00' $14.00 1%1999 X05/.10/201 a
2L2 1
Excelsior
$2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 82.50 82.50 $2.50i22005x 018/2Q1Z
Faribault ° $1.35 $1.60 $32.00 $280.00 - - - 01 6f:1108/20242T
Goodview $2.75 $3.00 $25.00 $110.00 $25.00 $2.50 $10.00 0 0
Grant $2.35 $2.00 $14.00 $75.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 02/
•
Hopkins $1.00 $2.00 $9.00 $63.00 - - - 41E0 1 -2/31/200 ;
Little Canada d $1.75 $400 $24.00 3.75% $15.00 $1.00 $7.00 1 0/ 2 003 2/3112 ; . . '
Mahtomedi $1.30 81.38 $14.40 $110.28 812.71 $0.63 814.84 0 1/2 ▪ 0051 1101/0 8 /2024
Maplewood $0.50 $1.00 $6.00 $45.00 $0.50 $0.50 $0.50 0112005c, '1 2/31/2009 s ?':•
3.0% i F
>100 kW at 3 _ ' I
' "A i. : t ma c.
5.0% 5.0% 5.0% primary or t
higher voltage � --
, • Minneapolis o <100 kW at <100 kW at 5.0% 5,0% 5.0% 01/2005 12/31/2014
effective secondary secondary 5
01/1994 voltage voltage >100 kW at '
secondary
voltage
f 3.
Minnetonka $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 - $2.00 $2.00 05/2005 08/09/2018
Monticello $1.95 85.50 $3100 $190.00 812.00 $12.00 $31.00 06/2007 05/31/2027=;
Mound
$2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 1112003 12/31/2008--
Mounds View 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 40% 4.0% • 4.0% 01%200 - 5. 12/31/2007 <.
$0.0023 $0.0023 $0.0016 $0.0009 $0.0023 $0.0023 $0.0016 l _
New Brighton 01/2003 Nl25 ?
per kWh per kWh per kWh per kWh per kWh per kWh per kWh c,
New Hope $1.50 $4.50 $9.00 $3600 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 0 1200 12!082011
Newport $0.50 81.00 $600 $50.00 $4.00 $1.00 $5.00 2pD7(f11812026
Oakdale p 7. � -,
$0.50 $1.00 $6.0 $50.00 $4.00 81 $5A0 l 2_ 004' P4D/27/2023
$0.0016 per kWh Customer peak demand less than 100 kW in calendar year �JO 3 Cifif �'
Owatonna 01/2003 •4,4101/2022„
$00014 per kWh Customer peak demand greater than 100 kW in calendar year - - <.
Prior Lake $1.50 $5.00 $10.00 850 - - - 07120 ` 0
Richfield $1.65 $5.10 $11.33 $73.65 - - - 0112006 103/12/2027:' j
•
•
•
.
.
.
•
Xcel Energy Sheet 2 of 6
Minnesota Electric Service-City Fees Updated 06/0112007
•
•
3 -�' - c am. o� - ro - - o tl .g. a - . a c . E R ci. m 5-' o •r m ar a • -' - = I ,r. . ,� w .._ '� ... x9 V ++ 'a' - �t]._0 _3 t, i w i"-
4 H m v, -t mE��`- -a- .�2''- - n $ U Ey gal-snit-R.0 Er m a -m _
-m
E o -
5 c,
rnz c .�n zr E a'nu m wo
Robbinsdale 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 06/2007• 07/01/2009,
Sartell' 82.50 52.50 52.50 52.50 52.50 82.50 52.50 0 X 31/2 00
3.0% Customers who purchase 550,000 or less in calendar year
Sauk Rapids 06/2003 06%15/2023:
p 1.5% That part which exceeds 550,000 in calendar year y <. ..
South St. Paul g 3.0% 10% 10% 3.0% - - - 07/2000 06/30/2015
St Cloud h 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% - - - 07/1987 06/3012007.;`
2%
purchase _ # s
<$100,000 in
calendar year `
St. Joseph $1.00 $1.75 510.00 58.00 51.00 $10.00 02%2004 1t9/2023 °: _
1.5% ' _
• that part s
>$100,000 in _ i. ., -
calendar year s §' ' "` - .
St. Louis Park 51.25 54.00 810.00 565.00 - 54.00 510.00 .011 2004! 02/15/20 r
St. Michael 52.50 $2.50 $2.50 510.00 510.00 52.50 , $10.00 't:02/200:474 2/0 0 8
St. Paul ' See fee schedule in Franchise Fee Notes. 41/21(2,64 0 t..,------
13 6 -
St. Paul Park 51.50 52.00 525.00 5335.00 510.00 $1.00 $5.00 08/2005 0511512025x,-
Stillwater $2.00 $2.50 $18.00 $125.00 54.00 $2.00 $18.00 w 1=• 06/30/2015'
Watertown 52.00 53.50 $15.00 $50.00 - 512.50 520.00 62 07 E 7102027x:
West St. Paul 1 526% 5.26% 5.26% 526% - - - i 6 6 6 - = '` �
White Bear Lake 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 05/. `' 05/01/20. 8
4.0% Customers who purchase 5100,000 or less in calendar year M ` `
Winona 06/20 X 1
1.5% That part which exceeds $100,000 in calendar year f a:=-
FRANCHISE FEE NOTES
a Baker: Represents a city fee collected to cover energy usage and maintenance on community street lighting.
'
• • ° Coon Rapids: The franchise fee excludes rate schedules for highway lighting, municipal street lighting, municipal water pumping, municipal fire
sirens, and municipal sewage disposal service.
Faribautt: The franchise fee excludes invoices to the city for street lighting and municipal pumping.
a Little Canada: The franchise fee shall not exceed $2,400 in any calendar year for the large commercial and industrial customer class.
• Minneapolis: The franchise fee for the residential customer class will change to 4.5% effective January 1, 2013.
' Sartetl: Effective with January of the respective years, the monthly franchise fee will be as follows: •
• 2007 and 2008 $2.50 • 2013 and 2014 $3.25 • 2019 and 2020 54.00
• 2009 and 2010 $2.75 • 2015 and 2016 53.50 • 2021 and 2022 $4.25
• 2011 and 2012 $3.00 • 2017 and 2018 53.75 • 2023 $4.50
g South St. Paul: The franchise fee excludes rate schedules for highway lighting, municipal street lighting, municipal water pumping, municipal
traffic signals, municipal fire sirens, and municipal sewage disposal service.
n St. Cloud: The franchise fee for residential heating customers will be 1.5% during the months of November - April. The franchise fee excludes
rate schedules for municipal street lighting, traffic signals, water pumping, and municipal sewage disposal service.
i
.
' i
1
Xcel Energy Sheet 3 of 6
Minnesota Electric Service - City Fees Updated 0610112007
{
' 1 St. Paul: The monthly franchise fee will be as stated below. The residential service franchise fee will be as stated except during the months of
November - April when there will be no fee. The fee shalt not exceed $620,000 during any calendar year from any large commercial and
, • industrial customer qualifying for service on the Competitive Market Rider. The schedules below show the meter, energy, and demand factor for
each year of the St. Paul franchise and for each of the customer classifications.
Cus tomer C _,_3 Meter Factor Monthly C per Acco
Start Date 1 -Nov 2006 1 -Nov -2008 1- Nov -2010 1- Nov -2012 1- Nov -2014
End Date 31 2408' 31- Oct -2010 , 31-Oct -2012 31-Oct -2014 31-Oct -2016
Residential (May- October) ` $2 63<E $2.70 $2.77 $2.84 $2.91
Small Commercial & Industrial • "��
$3.09 $3.22 $3.35 $3.48
Non- Demand � $2 96�: � , .
Firm Secondary$2 9 $$33:0099
3.09 $3.22 $3.35 $3:48
Firm Primary _ 96 $3.09 $122 $3.35 $3.48
Interruptible Secondary E .2, $3.09 $122 $3.35 $3.48 . .
Interruptible Primary $2 9 - $3.09 $3.22 $3.35 $3.48
Large Commercial & Industrial
Special 5' $5.11 $5.18 $5.25 $5.32
Firm Secondary r 5.0 $5.11 $5.18 $5.25 $5.32
Firm Primary t $ 04- $5.11 $5.18 $525 $5.32
Firm Trans. Transf. 5.104a` $5.11 $5.18 $5.25 $532
Interruptible Secondary x$50 $5.11 $118 $5.25 $5.32
Interruptible Primary 0X 34s = $5.11 $5.18 $525 $5.32
Interruptible TT -$5.04 $5.11 $5.18 $5.25 $5.32
Standby Service :.None None None None None
Public Street & Highway Lighting Ns=--- • `'. $6.81 86.88 $6.95 $7.02
Small Municipal Pumping
Non - Demand d $2:96 ": $3.09 $3.22 $3.35 $3.48
Demand Secondary s e w $ 2 9 6 4e $3.09 $3:22 $3.35 $3.48
Demand Primary , $2'96': $3.09 $3.22 $3.35 $3.48
Large Municipal Pumping
Demand Primary (Sec cust) $2 96 _ $3.09 $3.22 $3.35 $3.48
Fire and Civil Defense Siren Service 4 $2 96 $3.09 $3.22 $3.35 $3.48
Start Date 1- Nov -2016 1- Nov -2018 1 -Nov -2020 1- Nov -2022 1- Nov -2024
• End Date 31- Oct -2018 31- Oct -2020 31- Oct -2022 31 -Oct -2024 31- Aug -2026
Residential (May - October) $3.03 $3.15 $3.27 • $3.40 $3.54
Small Commercial & Industrial
Non - Demand $3.62 $3.76 $3.91 $4.07 $4.23
Firm Secondary $3.62 $3.76 $3.91 $4.07 $4.23
Firm Primary $3.62 $3.76 $3.91 $4.07 $4.23
interruptible Secondary $3.62 $3.76 $3.91 $4.07 $4.23
interruptible Primary $3.62 $3.76 $3.91 $4.07 $4.23
Large Commercial & Industrial
Special $5.53 $5.75 $5.98 $6.22 $6.47
Firm Secondary $5.53 $5.75 $5.98 $6.22 $6.47
Firm Primary $5.53 $5.75 $5.98 $6.22 $6.47
Firm Trans. Transf. $5.53 $5.75 $5.98 $6.22 $6.47
Interruptible Secondary $5.53 $5.75 $5.98 $6.22 $6.47
Interruptible Primary $5.53 $5.75 $5:98 $6.22 $6.47
Interruptible TT $5.53 .$5.75 $5.98 $6.22 $6.47
Standby Service None None None None None
Public Street & Highway Lighting $7.30 $7.59 $7.90 $8.21 $8.54
Small Municipal Pumping
• Non - Demand $3.62 $3.76 $3.91 $4.07 $4.23
Demand Secondary $3.62 $3.76 $3.91 $4.07 $4.23
Demand Primary $3.62 $3.76 $3.91 $4.07 $4.23
• Large Municipal Pumping
Demand Primary (Sec cust) $3.62 $3.76 $3.91 $4.07 $4.23
Fire and Civil Defense Siren Service $3.62 $3.76 $3.91 $4.07 $4.23
•
i
Xcei Energy Sheet 4 of 6
Minnesota Electric Service - City Fees Updated 06/01/2007
_ Customer Class 4 Energy Factor Monthly Charge per kWh
Start Date t ov 2006 . 1-Nov-2008 1-Nov-2010 1-Nov-2012 1-Nov-2014
End Date 4$1 Oct 2008 31- Oct -2010 31- Oct -2012 31-Oct -2014 31 -Oct -2016
Residential (May - October) $,9,0094 $0.0095 $0.0096 $0.0097 $0.0098
ll s
Small Commercial &lndustrial g. .
Non-Demand ,, ... ,- .$01004 - 0A_,1_ $0.0040 $0.0040 $0.0040 $0.0040
Firm Secondary 0018 - ,`. $0.0018 $0.0018 $0.0018 $0.0018
Firm Primary $0 0018V ` $0.0018 $0.0018 $0.0018 $0.0018
Interruptible Secondary s:$o 001Bri.,; $0.0018 $0.0018 $0.0018 $0,0018
Interruptible Primary $0 _ ; $0.0018 $0.0018 $0.0018 $0.0018
Large Commercial & Industrial
Special 0028 $0.0028 $0.0028 $0.0028 80.0028
Firm Secondary $ 0 0 00 St $0.0013 $0.0013 $0.0013 $0.0013
Firm Primary 0 3 $0.0013 $0.0013 $0.0013 $0.0013
Firm Trans. Transf. , 141 , 10$0: 1 0 . M.: $0.0013 80.0013 $0.0013 80.0013
Interruptible Secondary 0013 $0.0013 $0.0013 $0.0013 $0.0013
Interruptible Primary $0 09,, $0.0013 $0.0013 $0.0013 $0.0013
interruptible 71 $0 001.3 ' $0.0013 $0.0013 $0.0013 $0.0013
�0 ,
Standby Service None None None None None
Public Street & Highway Lighting -'5 $0,00 : . $0.0040 $0.0040 $0,0040 $0.0040
Small Municipal Pumping a
Non - Demand • . 0 0040 $0.0040 $0.0040 $0.0040 $0.0040
Demand Secondary PF $Q00 f $0.0018 $0.0018 $0.0018 $0.0018
Demand Primary ,$08Q $0.0018 $0.0018 $0.0018 $0.0018
Large Municipal Pumping
Demand Primary (Sec cust) $0 e01;$f, $0.0018 $0.0018 $0.0018 $0.0018 -
Fire and Civil Defense Siren Service ,,. 008 $0.0018 $0.0018 $0.0018 $0.0018
Start Date 1- Nov -2016 1- Nov -2018 1- Nov -2020 1 -Nov -2022 1 -Nov -2024
End Date 31- Oct -2018 31 -Oct -2020 _ 31- Oct -2022 _ 31 -Oct -2024 31- Aug -2026 '
Residential (May - October) $0.0102 $0.0106 $0,0110 $0.0115 $0.0119
Small Commercial & Industrial
Non - Demand • $0.0042 $0.0043 $0.0045 $0.0047 $0.0049
Firm Secondary $0.0019 $0.0019 $0.0020 $0.0021 $0.0022
Firm Primary $0.0019 $0.0019 $0.0020 $0.0021 $0.0022
Interruptible Secondary $0.0019 $0.0019 $0.0020 $0.0021 $0.0022
Interruptible Primary $0.0019 $0.0019 $0.0020 $0.0021 $0.0022
Large Commercial & Industrial
Special $0.0029 $0.0030 $0.0031 $0.0033 $0.0034
Firm Secondary $0.0014 $0.0014 $0.0015 $0.0015 $0.0016 !�
Firm Primary $0.0014 $0.0014 $0.0015 $0.0015 $0.0016
• Firm Trans. Transf. $0.0014 $0.0014 $0.0015 $0.0015 $0.0016
Interruptible Secondary $0.0014 $0.0014 $0.0015 $0.0015 $0.0016
Interruptible Primary $0.0014 $0.0014 $0.0015 $0.0015 $0.0016
• Interruptible TT $0.0014 $0.0014 $0.0015 $0.0015 $0.0016
Standby Service None None None None None
Public Street & Highway Lighting $0.0042 $0.0043 $0.0045 $0.0047 $0,0049
Small Municipal Pumping
Non - Demand 80.0042 $0.0043 $0.0045 $0.0047 $0.0049
Demand Secondary • $0.0019 $0.0019 $0.0020 $0.0021 $0.0022
Demand Primary $0.0019 $0.0019 $0.0020 $0.0021 $0.0022
Large Municipal Pumping
Demand Primary (Sec cust) $0.0019 $0.0019 $0.0020 $0.0021 $0.0022
Fire and Civil Defense Siren Service $0.0019 $0.0019 $0.0020 $0.0021 $0.0022
•
.
.
•
Xcel Energy Sheet 5 of 6
Minnesota Electric Service - City Fees Updated 06/01/2007
Customer Class � _ . Demand Facto�� nthly Charge per kW = -
Start Date 1146:0005 1- Nov - 2008 1 -Nov- 2010 1 -Nov -2012 1- Nov -2014
End Date ;:i31 D7 = 31- Oct -2010 31- Oct -2012 31- Oct -2014 31- Oct -2016
Residential (May - October) =a N • orte r None None None None
. , Small Commercial & Industrial :.
Non - Demand None _. None None None None
Firm Secondary -1 10 :; $1.10 $1.10 $1.10 $1.10
Firm Primary $1 06 ':, }: $1.06 $1.06 $1.06 $1.06
Interruptible Secondary $1 10 $1.10 $1,10 $1.10 $1.10
Interruptible Primary $1 06, $1.06 $1.06 $1.06 $1.06
Large Commercial & Industrial
Special None, ;, None • None None None
Firm Secondary 1r $1.10 $1.10 $1.10 $1.10 1.
• Firm Primary a '06 - $1.06 $1.06 $1.06 $1.06 •
Firm Trans. Transf.'CD _ _ $1.06 $1.06 $1.06 "$1.06
Interruptible Secondary $0 -81P. $0.81 $0.81 $0.81 $0.81
Interruptible Primary 071V $0.71 $0.71 $031 $0.71
Interruptible TT �0 51 $0.54 $0.57 $0.60 $0.63
Standby Service __= ,s,$0."30_��
_ $0 "33 $0.36 $0.39 $0.42
Public Street & Highway Lighting _`'° one_ None None None. None
Small Municipal Pumping t. =-
Non - Demand Non..
None None None None
Demand Secondary 1 10 $1.10 $1.10 $1.10 $1.10
Demand Primary ftl 06: $1.06 $1:06 $1.06 $1.06
Large Municipal Pumping ere '�:
Demand Primary (Sec cust) 1 0 $1.06 $1.06 $1.06 $1.06
Fire and Civil Defense Siren Service 106Y? $1.06 $1.06 $1.06 $1.06 .
Start Date 1-Nov-2016 1- Nov -2018 1- Nov -2020 " 1- Nov -2022 1- Nov -2024
End Date 31 -Oct -2018 31- Oct -2020 31- Oct -2022 31 -Oct -2024 31- Aug -2026
Residential (May - October) None None None None None
Small Commercial & Industrial
• Non - Demand None None None None None
Firm Secondary $1.14 $1.19 $1.24 $1.29 $1.34,
Firm Primary $1.10 $1.15 $1.19 $1.24 $1.29
Interruptible Secondary $1.14 $1.19 $1.24 $1.29 $1.34
Interruptible Primary $1.10 $1.15 $1.19 $1.24 $1.29
Large Commercial & Industrial
Special None None None None None
Firm Secondary $1.14 $1.19 $1.24 $1.29 $1.34
Firm Primary $1.10 $1.15 $1.19 $1.24 $1.29 ,
Firm Trans. Transf. $1.10 $1.15 $1.19 $1.24 $1.29
Interruptible Secondary $0.84 $0.88 $0.91 $0.95 $0.99
Interruptible Primary $0:74 $0.77 $0.80 $0.83 $0.86
Interruptible TT $0.66 $0.68 $0.71 $0.74 $0.77
Standby Service $0,44 $0.45 $0.47 $0.49 $0.51
Public Street & Highway Lighting None None None None None
Small Municipal Pumping `•.
Non- Demand None None None None None
Demand Secondary $1.14 $1.19 $1.24 $1.29 $1.34
Demand Primary $1.10 $1.15 $1.19 $1.24 $1.29
Large Municipal Pumping
Demand Primary (Sec cust) $1.10 $1.15 $1.19 $1.24 $1.29 ;
Fire and Civil Defense Siren Service $1.10 $1.15 $1.19 $1.24 $1.29
' West St. Paul: Represents a city fee derived from the sale of electricity within the city pursuant to city code Ordinance No. 702 approved on
December 29, 1966. The fee excludes rate schedules for municipal street fighting, water or sewage pumping, or other municipal services'.
.
•
1.
h
•
• i
Xce! Energy Sheet 6 of 6
Minnesota Electric Service — City Fees Updated 06/01/2007
' I
CITY SALES TAX
A city sales tax add-on to the state sales tax is applicable in general to customers subject to the state sales tax.
Community City Sales Tax Effective Date
Mankato 0.5% April 1, 1992
Minneapolis 0.5% February 1, 1987
Owatonna $0.005 April 1, 2007
Sartell 0.5% January 1, 2003 11
Sauk Rapids • 0.5% January 1, 2003
St. Augusta 0.5% January 1, 2003
St. Cloud 0.5% January 1, 2003 •
St. Joseph 0.5% January 1, 2006
St. Paul 0.5% September 1, 1993
Waite Park 0.5% January 1, 2006
. Hennepin County $0.0015 January 1, 2007
•
•
• I
•
• i
• I
S3
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
Payment in Lieu of Taxes and Free Service to City of Shakopee Cost History
TOTAL COSTS
PILOT,
PILOT PILOT Maintenance Free Service
Electric Water Free of Street & Maintenance
Year Transfer Transfer Service Lights of Street Lights
2000 727,102 366,736 47,597 (7,491) $ 1,133,944
2001 727,102 446,703 54,353 10,136 $ 1,238,294
2002 492,262 438,281 49,871 76,734 $ 1,057,148
2003 534,344 534,025 53,982 4,960 $ 1,127,311
2004 593,115 532,725 40,498 140,681 $ 1,307,019
2005 741,847 584,850 46,434 146,140 $ 1,519,272
2006 858,898 677,999 50,082 103,290 $ 1,690,269
2007 987,031 704,809 93,931 128,282 $ 1,914,053
2008 1,021,293 651,924 130,135 33,450 $ 1,836,802
2009 905,441 726,200 189,761 43,617 $ 1,865,019
2010 975,175 816,350 197,882 59,982 $ 2,049,389
2011 (Budget) 963,307 840,380 192,948 46,347 $ 2,042,982
Total 9,526,917 7,320,982 1,147,474 786,130 $ 18,781,503
M: \2011 \PILOT and Free Service Payment History 6/1/2011