HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.F.2. Approval of Minutes: October 11 and October 19, 2010ADJ. REGULAR SESSION
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 11, 2010
Mayor Schmitt called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Council members Steve Clay,
Pamela Punt, Pat Heitzman and Matt Lehman (at 7:12 p.m.) present. Also present were Mark
McNeill, City Administrator; Judith S. Cox, City Clerk; Bruce Loney, City Engineer/Public
Works Director; and R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director.
Mayor Schmitt asked if there were any additions or deletions to the agenda. Mr. McNeill had no
additions or deletions.
Clay/Heitzman moved to approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried 4 -0.
Mitch Rasmussen, Scott County Engineer, presented Council with the CSAH 101 Update and
Input. Mr. Rasmussen discussed and provided a map of the proposed layout of County Highway
101 as specified in past meetings with City Council and residential and business owners along
the Highway 101 Corridor. The improvements between Fillmore Street and Marschall Road
include a five lane roadway within the current right of way and improvements at the intersection
at 101 and Marschall Road as well as sidewalks on both sides and street lighting. Mr.
Rasmussen said that final approval will be brought before City Council on October 19, 2010.
Cncl. Lehman arrived at 7:12 p.m.
Chris Chromy, Engineer from Bolton Menke, Inc., presented Council with the Highway 101
project Aesthetics.
Mr. Chromy discussed the street lighting for the corridor. He said that the plan is to replace the
existing street lighting system, which is eligible for Mn/DOT Turn Back reimbursement
estimated at $390,000, from Fillmore Street to Dangerfield's. Shakopee Public Utilities is
interested in contributing approximately $25,000 to $30,000 for an upgrade for energy efficient
LED fixtures. Mr. Chromy said there would be additional costs for aesthetics. He outlined three
options for Council consideration.
Option 1: luminaire style consistent with Huber Park, 17' height. — estimated City cost $125,000.
Option 2: luminaire attached to 6' decorative arm, 27' height — estimated City cost $80,000.
Option 3: luminaire attached to 6' decorative arm, 30' height — estimated City cost $115,000.
All include: Fluted 8 -sided stainless steel pole, decorative stainless steel base and banner arms.
Mr. Chromy discussed decorative sidewalks and boulevards. He said the project would include a
5' concrete sidewalk and a 4.5' concrete decorative boulevard. Eligible Mn/DOT Turn Back
funds are for standard concrete in boulevard (3.25 per SF, approximately $75,000). A concrete
boulevard is recommended to separate between pedestrians and vehicles. He outlined three
options for a decorative boulevard pattern and three options for boulevard concrete color.
Mr. Chromy then presented three options for decorative sidewalks and boulevards.
Official Proceedings of the
Shakopee City Council
October 11, 2010
Page -2-
Option 1: Boulevard Pattern - standard concrete finish with simple squares, brown concrete at a
cost of $4.00 per square foot — City Cost $17,000.
Option 2: Boulevard Pattern - concrete with one -stamp finish, basket weave in brick red or ashlar
in charcoal at a cost of $5.00 per SF — City Cost $40,000.
Option 3: Boulevard Pattern - concrete with two stamp finish, soldier course and running bond
stamps in charcoal at a cost of $7.50 per SF — City Cost $97,000.
Mr. Chromy then discussed bollards to be placed in proposed areas where parking lots are
adjacent to sidewalks. The three styles include 8" embedded pipe filled with concrete, aesthetic
precast concrete and aesthetic cast aluminum. He also explained the 3 Tier Criteria for locations.
Tier 1: (approximately 20) at access closure locations where visual cue may confuse motorist.
Tier 2: (approximately 90) Tier 1 locations plus locations with zero set - back parking lots and
physical separation between parking lot and sidewalk.
Tier 3: (approximately 180) Tier 1 & 2 locations plus locations with non - conforming parking lot
set -back (less than 15') and minimal separation between parking lot and sidewalk.
Mr. Chromy then explained the cost for each of the three tiers for each of the three styles.
Option 1: 8" embedded pipe filled with concrete, rounded cap, with any colored sleeve and
optional chain at a cost of $500 each. City costs - Tier 1 - $10,000; Tier 2 - $45,000 and Tier 3 —
$90,000.
Option 2: aesthetic precast concrete at a cost of $600 each and would require annual
maintenance. City costs — Tier 1 - $12,000; Tier 2 — $54,000; Tier 3 - $108,000.
Option 3: aesthetic cast aluminum at a cost of $1,200 each. City cost — Tier 1 - $24,000; Tier 2 —
$108,000; and Tier 3 - $216,000.
Mr. Chromy discussed City cost considerations. He said the City has $325,000 budgeted for
"other improvements" for this project. He outlined different cost scenarios for the lighting,
sidewalk/boulevards, and bollards.
After Council discussed the options, it was the consensus to proceed with option 2 lighting and
extend it to Huber Park; option 1 sidewalk/boulevard with brown concrete for the boulevard; and
option 2, Tier 2 bollard with brown as the color of the bollard.
Mr. Loney explained that a resolution will be brought back for council's consideration relating to
the preliminary design layout presented. Councilor Lehman stated that he had two concerns.
Councilor Heitzman stated that he would like to see the difference in the man hours plowing
around the bollards and plowing during the 2010/2011 snow season without the bollards.
Official Proceedings of the
Shakopee City Council
October 11, 2010
Page -3-
Clay/Punt moved to approve the preliminary design layout for County Highway 101 (1 S` Avenue)
from Fillmore Street to Marschall Road as presented tonight. Motion carried 3 -2 which Cncl.
Heitzman opposed and Cncl. Lehman abstaining.
Mr. Chromy said the Highway 101 schedule is that the plan approval* will take place in January
2011; with a bid letting in March of 2011; and construction May through October 2011. He also
explained and showed a diagram of a preliminary plan of traffic flow and detours planned during
construction.
Mr. Chromy updated the Council on the CSAH 69 rehabilitation. He said that in 2011 the plan is
to paint and maintain the railroad overpasses on CSAH 69 and in 2012 resurface CSAH 69 from
169 to 3rd Avenue with a realignment of 10``' Avenue to CSAH 69. Also, reconstruct CSAH 69
from 3 Avenue to Atwood Street.
Michael Leek, Community Development Director, presented Council with an update of the
Express Bus Service Expansion.
Mr. Leek said that in the past staff reviewed with Council the Transit Operations Plan. The plan
included information related to an additional bus funded through the Job Access Reverse
Commute (JARC) funds. In addition, staffs from the cities of Shakopee and Prior Lake have
been working with Southwest Transit (SWT) staff to implement a plan to have two of their buses
serve BlueXpress riders while providing replacement service at the Anderson Lakes Park and
Ride site. As the specifics for each are worked out, they will be brought to the City's TAC for
review and Council for final review.
Clay/Punt moved to adjourn to Tuesday, October 19, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. Motion carried 5 -0.
Meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m.
INea-
dith S. Cox
City Clerk
Kim Weckman
Recording Secretary
ADJ. REGULAR SESSION SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 19, 2010
Mayor Schmitt called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Council members Steve Clay, Matt
Lehman, Pamela Punt and Pat Heitzman present. Also present was Mark McNeill, City Administrator;
Kris Wilson, Assistant City Administrator; Bruce Loney, City Engineer/Public Works Director; R.
Michael Leek, Community Development Director; Gregg Voxland, Finance Director; Sarah Sonsalla,
City Attorney; and Judith S. Cox, City Clerk.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Schmitt asked if there were any additions or deletions to the agenda. Mr. McNeill asked to add
13.A.1. Sewer Extension on 2 °d Avenue and Shumway Street.
Clay/Punt moved to approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried 5 -0.
In the Mayor's Report Mayor Schmitt attended the Municipal Legislative Committee in Shoreview on
October 7 On October 8 he attended the SCALE meeting held at the Training Facility in Jordan.
On October 9 he attended the fire department retirement banquet. On October 14 he attended the
169 Corridor meeting. Heard reports on Minnesota Department of Transportation. He also attended
strategy meeting regarding the Transportation Policy memo that was drafted and sent to the
Metropolitan Council.
Mayor Schmitt asked if there were any additions or deletions to the Consent Agenda.
Cncl. Lehman asked to remove 5.A.3., County Road 101 Reconstruction Layout Approval — Res. No.
7055.
Lehman/Heitzman moved to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Mr. McNeill read the consent
agenda. Motion carried 5 -0.
Lehman/Heitzman moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute a Cooperative
Agreement with Scott County for the construction of a bituminous trail along the west side of CSAH
18. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda)
Lehman/Heitzman moved to accept the quote from Final Grade, Inc. in the amount of $42,298.50 for
the Upper Valley Drainageway Stabilization at Sarazin Street project. (Motion carried under the
Consent Agenda)
Lehman/Heitzman moved to accept, with regret the resignation of Travis Brown from his position as a
Community Service Officer with the Shakopee Police Department, effective October 27, 2010.
(Motion carried under the Consent Agenda)
Lehman/Heitzman moved to authorize the hiring of Thomas Sheveland as a probationary Community
Service Officer at Step E of Grade Level 2 of the City's 2010 Non -Union Pay Plan, subject to the
satisfactory completion of pre- employment medical and psychological examinations. (Motion carried
under the Consent Agenda)
Official Proceedings of the October 19, 2010
Shakopee City Council Page -2-
Lehman/Heitzman moved to approve the bills in the amount of $1,170,645.91 and electronic transfers
in the amount of $721,628.69 for a total of $1,892,274.60. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda)
Lehman/Heitzman moved to approve the City Council minutes of September 21, 2010 and October 5,
2010. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda)
Lehman/Heitzman offered Resolution No. 7051 A Resolution Adopting a Fund Balance Policy, and
moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda)
Lehman/Heitzman offered Resolution No. 7052, A Resolution Transferring the Board of Equalization
Duties to Scott County, and moved its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda)
Lehman/Heitzman moved to increase the fixed asset capitalization threshold from $5,000 to $10,000
due to inflation and the few items purchased that cost between those two amounts and to increase the
life from more than one year to more than two years. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda)
Lehman/Heitzman moved to reschedule the second regular City Council meeting in December to
Monday, December 20 at 7:00 p.m. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda)
Mayor Schmitt asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak on a topic that was not
on the agenda. No one responded.
Heitzman/Clay moved to open the public hearing on the proposed assessments for delinquent refuse
bills from Dick's /Lakeville Sanitation, Inc. Motion carried 5 -0.
Bruce Loney, Public Works Director /City Engineer, presented Council with Resolution No. 7054 that
would assess property owners on taxes payable 2011 for unpaid refuse and recycling services from the
City's designated garbage hauler, Dick's/Lakeville Sanitation, Inc.
Mr. Loney said that the memo stated there were approximately 250 delinquent accounts for a total
amount due of $66,500.00. Mr. Loney said that prior to the Council meeting several people paid their
bills which reduced the number of delinquent accounts to 180 for a total amount due of $49,000.00. In
addition $45.00 is added to each assessment for staff time. Mr. Loney said that Mr. Domack was
present from Dick's Sanitation to answer any questions.
Mayor Schmitt asked if there was anyone in the audience who wanted to speak at the public hearing.
Steve Link, 12756 Old Brickyard Road, presented Council with his concerns. Mr. Link said that he
owns rental property at 972 Atwood St. Approximately three weeks ago he received a letter from the
City saying that he owed $139.00 for an unpaid garbage bill which included the garbage bill and
assessed late fees.
Mr. Link said that one of his renters moved out of his property at 972 Atwood St. in June, 2009.
Unknown to Mr. Link, the renter had an unpaid garbage bill in the amount of $19.00. Because of the
laps in time of the renter not paying the over -due bill and the assessment fees, it didn't prompt the
shadow billing that Dick's Sanitation does with property owners until the bill exceeded $100.00. Mr.
Link expressed his concerns regarding the property owner's responsibility in paying the bill when the
account was in the renter's name. He said all other utilities are in the tenant's name and they are solely
Official Proceedings of the
Shakopee City Council
Heitzman/Clay moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5 -0.
October 19, 2010
Page -3-
responsible for any late bills and or fees they incur and doesn't understand why the garbage service is
held to a different standard. He also expressed his dissatisfaction with being forced by a City contract
to use the specified garbage service.
Mr. McNeill addressed Mr. Link's questions and concerns regarding the contract the City has with
Dick's /Lakeville Sanitation. It was suggested to Mr. Link that if a renter moves out of his rental units,
he should contact Dick's/Lakeville Sanitation to see if there are any unpaid bills incurred by the renter.
It was also suggested to Mr. Domack of Dick's /Lakeville Sanitation, that in the future if a name at a
residence changes at a rental property that they should begin shadow billing the property owner
immediately. Mr. Domack said that they would shadow bill the property owner immediately instead of
waiting quarterly and/or the bill to exceed $100.00.
Linda Johannes, 12756 Old Brickyard Rd., Shakopee, said she owns rental property at 969 Atwood St.,
and suggested that the shadow billing start immediately so property owners could deduct late bills
from the tenant's security deposit.
Punt/Clay offered Resolution No. 7054, A Resolution Adopting Assessments for Delinquent Refuse
Bills, and moved its adoption. Motion carried 5 -0.
Clay/Heitzman moved to open the public hearing on the Vacation of Easement in Westridge Lake
Estates 2nd Addition. Motion carried 5 -0.
Michael Leek, Community Development Director said that Darrel Gonyea has submitted an
application for vacation of an easement located at 1053 Peninsula Point Road & 1067 Vista Ridge
Lake. Mr. Leek provided Council with a map highlighting the existing easement. The applicant is
intending to realign the common property line thru a Minor Subdivision application and would provide
a new easement along the newly created property line, consistent with the City Engineering
Department's requirement. The Planning Commission recommended approval.
Darrel Gonyea, 1053 Peninsula Point Road, answered a few questions that Council members had
regarding the vacation of easement.
Mayor Schmitt asked if there was anyone in the audience that which to speak at the public hearing. No
one responded.
Lehman/Heitzman moved to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5 -0.
Lehman/Punt offered Resolution No. 7053, A Resolution Approving a Vacation of Easement within
Westridge Lake Estates 2 Addition at 1053 Peninsula point Road and 1067 Vista Ridge Lane, and
moved its adoption. Discussion followed.
Cncl. Clay expressed his concerns that people are not taking the time to properly survey their
properties before putting in encroaching on easements.
Mayor Schmitt asked for a vote on the motion. Motion carried 5 -0.
Official Proceedings of the
Shakopee City Council
Mayor Schmitt asked to discuss the item that was pulled from the Consent Agenda, County Road 101
Reconstruction Layout Approval.
Cncl. Lehman said he asked for this item to be removed from the Consent Agenda because he owns
property in the 101 corridor and can not vote on the item.
Clay/Heitzman offered Resolution No. 7055, a Resolution Approving C.R. 101 Fillmore Street to
Marschall Road Reconstruction Layout, and moved its adoption. Motion carried 4 -1 with Cncl.
Lehman abstaining.
Mayor Schmitt asked for Council liaison reports. Cncl. Heitzman said he attended the 169 Corridor
meeting. Cncl. Punt had no report. Cncl. Lehman said he spent time with the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (MPCA) discussing pollutants from the City storm drains into the Minnesota River.
Cncl. Clay attended the Shakopee Public Utility Commission meeting. Discussed was the work they
finished working on the shut off valve boxes to get ready for the winter snow plow season. SPUC also
did 30 random home water tests for lead and all came back negative for lead. They also hired Mr.
Schimmel as the new Water Superintendent.
Lehman/Punt moved to recess for the Economic Development Authority Meeting. Motion carried 5 -0.
Mayor Schmitt re- convened the meeting at 8:02 p.m.
October 19, 2010
Page -4-
Kris Wilson, Assistant City Administrator, presented Council with the 2011 Employee Medical and
Dental Insurance.
Ms. Wilson said the Council is being asked to consider two options for employee's 2011 health
insurance, a renewal option for 2011 dental insurance and to adopt the City's contribution rates for
2011.
Ms. Wilson said the City received a renewal offer from Delta Dental that provides the same coverage
that we currently have for 3.5% increase in monthly premiums.
Ms. Wilson said state law requires public sector employers to seek competitive bids on their employee
insurance benefits at least once very five years. Because it has been five years since seeking bids for
medical insurance, the City hired insurance broker, Financial Concepts, Inc. (FCI) to assist in the
process. Bids were sought from Medica, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Health Partners and Preferred One.
Only one was interested and submitted a bid and that was Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS).
BCBS offered the same two plans that the City currently has, however they are only willing to offer us
one provider network. With Medica the City currently has two provider networks, a larger and a
smaller network. If the City switches to BCBS, everyone would have access to the larger open- access
network only and the City would end up paying for the increase in cost.
BCBS offer reflects a 9.4% increase over current rates compared to an average of 11.1% if the City
stays with Medica, but because of the provider network issue described above, a move to BCBS would
result in the City and 46 employees who currently opt for the smaller network paying more than with
Medica, 40 wouldn't see a change and 41 would see a cost savings. The added cost to the City by
selecting the BCBS offer over Medica would be approximately $15,600 for 2011. This would,
Official Proceedings of the October 19, 2010
Shakopee City Council Page -5-
however, save a group of 40 employees a collective $26,400. The move to BCBS would also result in
some employees finding their current doctors to be out of network and their current prescription to be
non - formulary, resulting in a higher cost to the employee.
Ms. Wilson said that FCI then contacted Medica and was able to negotiate them down to an offer of a
12.8% increase to the Traditional Co -Pay plan and 10.6% increase on the high deductible plan for the
same benefit levels currently in place.
Additionally, Medica has provided the City with a rate cap of 13% for 2012, whereas BCBS is only
able to offer a 16% rate cap. As a result, staying with Medica is likely to cost the group less over the
course of two years than switching to BCBS.
Ms. Wilson said that an employee insurance committee was formed to study the options available to
the City and provide input on the final recommendations. The group as a whole had no clear
consensus as to a preference of Medica or BCBS.
Ms. Wilson discussed the City contribution levels for the employees. She said for many years the City
has paid 100 percent of the monthly premium for employees selecting single medical coverage, 88
percent for 2 -party coverage and 72.5 percent for family coverage. For dental insurance, the City has
traditionally paid 100 percent of the monthly premium for employees selecting single coverage and
contributed an equal dollar amount toward the cost of 2 -party and family coverage. Staff is
recommending that the Council approve the same level of contribution.
Ms. Wilson also said that staff is recommending that the City stay with Medica and Council approve
the same contribution level of $750 for single and $1,500 for 2- party/family for employee Health
Savings Accounts (HSA) for those employees selecting the high- deductible medical plan. Also enter
into contract with Delta Dental to continue the existing dental offerings at the quoted price.
Brad Bisek, 14087 Wilds Path NW, Prior Lake, who is also a City employee, spoke on behalf of other
City employees who favor the BCBS health insurance offer. Mr. Bisek said that, according to his
numbers, a majority of staff members would see a cost savings benefit by moving to BCBS but realizes
that approximately 46 staff members would see an increase from $3.00 to $6.00. Mr. Bisek presented
a spreadsheet with comparison numbers between BCBS and Medica.
Clay/Lehman offered Resolution No. 7056, A Resolution Adopting the City of Shakopee's
Contribution Levels for Employee Benefits for the Year 2011, and moved its adoption. Motion carried
5 -0.
Lehman/Heitzman moved to authorize appropriate officials to enter into contracts with Medica and
Delta Dental for the renewal of group insurance plans for 2011 at the quoted prices. Motion carried 5-
0.
Lehman/Heitzman moved for a seven minute recess. Motion carried 5 -0.
Mayor Schmitt re- convened the meeting at 9:30 p.m.
Mr. Loney presented Council with the Sewer Extension at 2 Avenue and Shumway St.
Official Proceedings of the October 19, 2010
Shakopee City Council Page -6-
Mr. Loney said that Council ordered a preliminary report for sewer and water on 2 Avenue from
Apgar St. to Shumway St. and water on Shumway St. from 2nd Avenue to 3 Avenue. The project was
authorized to determine cost of extending utilities to 211 Shumway versus replacement of the septic
system.
Mr. Loney discussed the pros and cons of moving forward with the project. Some of the pros are that
municipal services would be extended to the residents in the project area. The downside of the project
is that the cost to do the project is significant. The cost of a watermain is approximately $100,500
which SPUC said they would pay for half of the cost. The sewer and water costs are approximately
$157,480 for a total cost of $257,980. The assessment per lot would be approximately $52,000 per lot
which probably exceeds the value of what the lots are worth. Mr. Loney was looking for Council
direction if he should move forward with the study and benefit analysis or discontinue the study.
Lehman/Heitzman moved to direct staff to not move forward with the study for financial reasons and
to allow the property owner at 211 Shumway to proceed with putting in a septic system. Motion
carried 5 -0.
Gregg Voxland, Finance Director, presented Council with the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and
future Tax Levy Projections.
Mr. Voxland gave a review of the current status of the 2011 - 2015 CIP and the impact of the decision
not to assess for overlays.
Mr. Voxland said that the impact of the overlay decision is that the city pays for the share of the
project that would have been assessed. Plus, because at least 20% of the project is not assessed, bonds
cannot be sold to finance the project and spread the cost (tax levy) out over several years.
It was the intent on the current overlay schedule to transition the levy to a current operating levy
instead of a debt service levy over several years. The decision not to assess forced an immediate
change instead of transitioning a debt service levy over time. Staff has put together a budget that uses
the fund balance in the Capital Improvement Fund (CIF) to transition to the operating levy for
overlays.
Mr. Voxland reviewed the CIF and the projected debt service levy based on the CIP. The increasing
debt service levy for 2012 -2015 amounts to about a 2% annual increase in the total levy. If General
Fund expenditures are increased 3% annually, there would need to be an annual levy increase between
2% and 3% also. This may result in a total tax increase between 4% and 5% for the next few years.
Discussion followed.
Mr. Voxland said he would come back to Council with some alternative scenarios to the issue.
Lehman/Punt moved to recess for an executive session to discuss labor negotiations, at 10:10 p.m..
Motion carried 5 -0.
Mayor Schmitt re- convened the meeting at 10:30 p.m. No action was taken during the executive
session.
Official Proceedings of the
Shakopee City Council
October 19, 2010
Page -7-
Mr. McNeill summarized that the ratification of the 2010 Patrol Officers Union Contract consists of a
one -year labor agreement with a 1% general wage increase and a $25 uniform allowance increase.
Clay/Punt moved to authorize the appropriate officials to enter into a one -year labor agreement for
2010 with Law Enforcement Labor Services, on behalf of the City's patrol officers, to include a 1%
general wage increase and a $25 uniform allowance increase. Motion carried 5 -0.
Ms. Wilson presented Council with the Sergeants 2010 labor contract. She said the sergeants have
verbally agreed to a one year contract for 2010 to include a 1% general wage increase and a $25
uniform allowance increase, language changes to the injury on -duty article that have no monetary
value, an addition to the 20 year step to the longevity pay plan in exchange to do away with the
longevity plan for any new appointed or promoted sergeants, an adjustment to the post employment
health care savings plan that has no monetary value and a mid - way step to the vacation accrual cap so
that an employee between 11 -15 years of service may accrue up to 300 hours of vacation.
Lehman/Heitzman moved to authorize the appropriate officials to enter into a one -year labor
agreement for 2010 with Law Enforcement Labor Services on behalf of the City's police sergeants.
Motion carried 5 -0.
Mr. McNeill stated that the patrol officers and sergeants have settled on a 1% cost of living adjustment
for 2010. The non -union and public works group did not receive a cost of living adjustment. He asked
if Council would like to consider a one -time additional floating holiday to be taken before December
31, 2010 for those employees who received no adjustment for 2010.
Lehman/Clay moved to authorize staff to extend to the non -union employees and the Public Works
staff an additional floating holiday to be taken before December 31, 2010. Motion carried 5 -0.
Punt/Heitzman moved to adjourn to Tuesday, November 9, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. Motion carried 5 -0.
Meeting adjourned at 10:35 p.m.
Judith S. Cox
City Clerk
Kim Weckman
Recording Secretary