HomeMy WebLinkAbout3. CSAH 101 Update and Input10/11 /2010
~~~;
'~:1r.
County Highway 101 (1St Avenue)
Fillmore Street to Marschall Road
Project Aesthetics
Light Poles, Bollards, Sidewalks & Boulevards
Presented to City Council by
Chris Chromy, P.E., P.T.O.E.
Bolton & Menk, Inc. _-
October 11, 2010 j',~'c~tt
SHAKOPEE
Aesthetic Treatments
^ Street Lighting
- Replacement of existing street lighting
- Pole style, height, and effectiveness
- Costs
- Location/Limits of Lighting
^ Decorative Sidewalks and Boulevards
- Project includes 5' sidewalk and 4.5' concrete boulevard along both
sides of CSAH 101
- Surface treatment and color options
- Costs
^ Bollards ==
-Separation of sidewalk from adjacent parking lots • /
- Locations, style and color options 11
-Costs
1
10/11/2010
Existing Street lighting
Downtown to Main Street Main Street to Marschall Road
~;
Street lighting
^ Replacement of existing street lighting system eligible for
Mn/DOT Turn Back reimbursement (Fillmore street to Dangerfield's)
- Estimated at approximately $390,000
- Average II{umination of 1.0 foot candles and Uniformity Ratio of 4.0
(average/minimum)
^ SPUC Contribution of approximately $25,000 to $30,000 for
energy efficient LED fixtures
^ Additional Cost for increased aesthetics
- 3 Style Options
- Option 1: Luminaire style consistent with Huber Park, 17' height
Option 2: Luminaire attached to 6' decorative arm, 27' height
- Option 3: Luminaire attached to 6' decorative arm, 30' height
All include: Fluted 8-sided stainless steel pole, decorative stainless ~f`
steel base, and banner arms ~ Pull
n ~
-~
,* E ,,.~,._; ~:~,
2
10/11 /2010
Street Lighting
Option 1: Luminaire style consistent with Huber Park, 17' Height
;,_~,
~,J~CO~ SHAKOPEE
• ~I~
/ ~~`
City of Shakopee Costs:
Total Street Lighting Costs: $545,000
Minus MnjDOT/SPUC Contribution: 420 000
Estimate City Cost: $125,000
(Approx. $95,000 more to extend to Huber Park)
...~
/~CO,~+ Sl ~AKOPE E
3
Street Lighting
Option 1: Luminaire style consistent with Huber Park, 17' Height
10/11/2010
Street Lighting
Option 2: Luminaire attached to 6' decorative arm, 27' height
.._.,
_. ~~ .
r.. ~~~ .:., _ ~ .
_._ _ ~
-,
i . __
ii
~~
-"
,__ i ,~CDtt SI IAKOPEE 11
Street lighting
Option 2: Luminaire attached to 6' decorative arm, 27' height
l i ~ ~ ~..~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.
City of Shakopee Costs:
Total Street Lighting Costs: $500,000
Minus Mn/DOT/SPUC Contribution: 420 000
Estimate City Cost: $ 80,000
(Approx. $82,000 more to extend to Huber Park)
~+..~..
-SCO~ S
4
10/11/2010
Street lighting
Option 3: Luminaire attached to 6' decorative arm, 30' Height
i ~,.
_s ;- ~ „>
~. ~~
.-" ~~ _-
_.
!'
~o
!' I.
J_>
''"` ~
,~
._ ~'~'CO~ SHAKOPEE d
Street Lighting
Option 3: Luminaire attached to 6' decorative arm, 30' Height
..,~~ ~„ ~. ~ o, fi -~ ~ -ns ~ -r L
_.. _ _.
~, ~, ~ ,
_. ~ . ~,~, ,~,, .o ._, ,~,,_ 9 e ~, ~, . A ,
:,
1 - -
.,,, ,.
~ ~,
e
City of Shakopee Costs:
Total Street Lighting Costs: $530,000
Minus Mn/DOT/SPUC Contribution: 415 000
Estimate City Cost: $115,000
(Approx. $85,000 more to extend to Huber Park) •
~ •
"~ "~ C~~ SI IAKOPEE
5
10/11/2010
Street Lighting Considerations
^ Effectiveness of Lighting Options for Roadway and Sidewalk
Lighting
- Option 1: Average Illumination of 1.2 and 3.9 Uniformity Ratio
- Option 2: Average Illumination of 1.2 and 3.9 Uniformity Ratio
- Option 3: Average Illumination of 1.1 and 1.4 Uniformity Ratio
^ City Costs (Above Mn/DOT Turn Back)
- Option 1 = $125,000
- Option 2 = $80,000
- Option 3 = $115,000
^ Extension to Huber Park/Downtown
- $82,000 to $95,000 (complete replacement)
- $60,000 to $75,000 (poles and fixtures onlvl nn
~ • /~\
~~ "^-~ ~~~ SI IAKOPEE
Decorative Sidewalks & Boulevards
^ Project to include 5' concrete sidewalk and 4.5'
concrete decorative boulevard
^ Mn/DOT Turn back eligible for standard concrete in
boulevard ($3.25 per SF, approx. $75,000)
^ Concrete boulevard recommended
- Aesthetics/Inability to grow turf
- Separation between pedestrians and vehicles
^ Choose one of each to create custom aesthetic look:
- Decorative boulevard pattern
- Color for boulevard concrete
,.~. •
~ ~~~~~ SHAKOPEE
6
10/11 /2010
Decorative Sidewalks & Boulevards
^ 3 Options for Decorative Boulevard Pattern
- Simple Squares (additional joints in concrete)
- One Stamp (Ashlar or Basketweave pattern)
- Two Stamp (Soldier Course and Running Bond pattern)
^ 3 Options for Boulevard Concrete Color
- Brick Red (match downtown and Huber Park playground)
- Brown
- Charcoal/Dark Gray
.,
1 CO~ SI IAKOPEE
7
10/11 /2010
Decorative Sidewalks & Boulevards
s" Sidewalk
Decorative BoulPVard Pattern s'-o• ~ a'-s•
Blud-
^ Option 1
- Standard Concrete Finish Regular concrete-- j'--a•
with Simple Squares j
- Brown Concrete ~ Sidewalk
4' 0"
- Cost: $4.00 per SF (approx.) Light Pole-------
~„ R1'0"
City Cost: $17,000
SHAKOPEE
....~.
SCOT
Bollard---
Colored concrete
(brown)
8
10/11/2010
Decorative Sidewalks & Boulevards
6" Sidewalk ~" Sidewalk
Decorative Boulevard Pattern ~ s-o• ~ a'-s°
~j"-~ B1vd.
^ Option 2
- Concrete with One-Stamp Regulaf concrete--;--s
Finish I
- Basketweave in Brick Red Sidewalk
i a•-o"
Li
h
P
l
- Ashlar in Charcoal g
t
o
e-------
- Cost: $5.00 per SF (approx.) '' ei•-o°
~I
City Cost: $40,000
~~~~- -'r`~ s
x
~ Bollard---------~
l ~
' J 4',
~~ „9
~5~ !
_
~
a
r
~ .:~-t
"`
-" g
"
h~
~,-<
w~ ~
~
"~ Basketweave ----~---------i
~-
~~'
~~- ~ ~
.-~ t.
` stampedcolofed
~'
,~.
~~..
` . `~w ` f „~ ~ (red) concrete ~
~
Y. ~
td F r
~
~ ~$x
L
..~~-
~,~ ~ .o I
Decorative Sidewalks & Boulevards
6" Sidewalk
Decorative Boulevard Pattern ~ s•-o° ~ as•
~~_,• Blvd.
^ Option 3
- Concrete with Two Stamp Regular concrete--=--i
Finish
- "Soldier Course" and Sidewalk
"Running Bond" Stamps in a~ o°
Light Pole-------
Charcoal R~•-o"
- Cost: $7.50 per SF (approx.) ~
More complex to construct '
City Cost: $97,000
~ rt~ Bollard---------,-~r
i
,~
.;
~ . ~ i ~ ~;
~ qty'
}
.
¢ '
' ~~
Soldlef COOfSe ---1-------- '
~
~
~
~ ~ and running bond ~ ~
~
~
'{ ~
s i
stamped colored
•
(charcoap concrete
Q ~ $J a •
k.'4~
..
Xu
9
10/11/2010
Decorative Boulevard
Considerations
^ Colored Concrete achieves separation between pedestrians
and vehicles
^ Option 1 presents lowest on-going maintenance
^ Some support voiced for charcoal color, opposition to red
^ City Costs (Above Mn/DOT Turn Back)
- Option 1 = $17,000
- Option 2 = $40,000
- Option 3 = $97,000
•
1~^+ " ~ ,,
/a~~~ St-IAKOPEE
Bollards
^ Proposed in areas where parking lots are adjacent to
sidewalks
^ 3 Style Options
- Option 1
- 8" embedded pipe filled with concrete, rounded cap
- Potential for any color or plastic sleeve
- Optional chain
- Option 2
- Aesthetic precast concrete
- Colors available include sand, gray, brown, and brick red
- Optional chain
- Option 3
- Aesthetic cast aluminum ~
- Style and color can be chosen to match light poles ~~ d
- Optional chain
1
10
10/11 /2010
Bollards
Proposed in areas where parking lots are adjacent to sidewalks
^ 3 Tier Criteria
- Tier 1 (approx. 20)
- At access closure locations where visual cue may confuse motorist
- Tier 2 (approx. 90)
- Tier 1 locations
- At locations with zero set-back parking lots and physical separation
between parking lot and sidewalk
- Tier 3 (approx. 180)
- Tier 1 & 2 locations
- At locations with non-conforming parking lot set-back (less than 1 ' d
minimal separation between parking lot and sidewalk •
~+ ~''~ '
/+.~ ~~~ SI-IAKOPEE 1
Bollards
Option 1
^ 8" steel pipe filled
with concrete
^ Cost =approx.
$500 each
(installed)
^ Low Maintenance
Tier 1 Total Cost: $10,000
Tier 2 Total Cost: $45,000
Tier 3 Total Cost: $90,000
..... • a,
f,~'CIO~ SIIAKOPEE t ~
11
10/11/2010
Bollards
Option 2
^ Aesthetic precast
concrete
^ Cost =approx. $600
each (installed)
^ Annual Maintenance
w-_-
,,
K .:
,;~a+*•,
Tier 1 Total Cost: $12,000
Tier 2 Total Cost: $54,000
Tier 3 Total Cost: $108,000
r,.'~cOtt SHAKOPEE ~
Bollards
Option 3
^ Aesthetic cast
aluminum
^ Cost =approx.
$1200 each
(installed)
~II i t
j 'BANNER
EYE BOLT
-06"
I I,`
I
",1
~15'~-~
Tier 1 Total Cost: $24,000
Tier 2 Total Cost: $108,000
Tier 3 Total Cost: $216,000
,.~ I ~ .
1~~,+~C>fl~ Sl~hKOPEE "
12
10/11/2010
Bollard Considerations
^ Tier 1 and 2 have pedestrian safety and aesthetic benefit
^ Tier 3 primarily aesthetic benefit
^ Some support for aesthetic value
^ City Cost yet to be determined
- Assume Tier 1 & 2 and use of Option 2 style for planning purposes
($54,000)
~~
•
-~ ~~ „
~,,~CO~ S>=IAKOPEE
Existing Condition: CSAH 101 West of Marschalf
-- ~#
.F:
~~. .. ,- ~" .rr~.d
13
10/11 /2010
14
10/11/2010
15
10/11 /2010
City Cost Considerations
^ $325,000 budgeted for "Other Improvements"
- Decorative Street Lighting (27' pole): $ 80,000
- DecorativeJColored Concrete Boulevard: $ 17,000
- Bollards: 54 000
$151, 000
A// COSt and OUtS%de agency COntr%bUtlons are pre/iminary and
subject to change
^ Other City Costs
- 25% of Traffic Signal Costs $75,000 to $90,000
- Lighting Replacement West of Fillmore St. $60,000 to $95,000
- Engineering and other costs pending
... •
-~ ~ .. ,~
~~' b G
~,~COtt S1-IAKOPEE
16